Task: Table-QA (source dataset: TableBench)

Task: 
You are given a table containing structured data and a natural language question referring to the table. Your goal is to analyze the table and provide an accurate and concise answer based on the given data.

Instructions:
1. Understand the Table: Examine the structure, headers, and data in the table. Identify relevant columns and rows related to the question.
2. Interpret the Question: Determine whether the question requires direct retrieval, aggregation, comparison, sorting, filtering, or inference.
3. Extract the Answer: Use logical reasoning and numerical operations (if necessary) to derive the correct response from the table.
4. Format the Answer: No explanation, return the answer in a structured JSON format: {"answer": <answer>}. If the question cannot be answered due to missing or ambiguous data, return a JSON response with {"answer": null}.

Table:
| Unnamed: 0       | 1994 general   | 1995 regional   |   1996 general |   1999 european | 2000 regional   |   2001 general |   2004 european | 2005 regional   |   2006 general |   2008 general |   2009 european | 2010 regional   |   2013 general |
|:-----------------|:---------------|:----------------|---------------:|----------------:|:----------------|---------------:|----------------:|:----------------|---------------:|---------------:|----------------:|:----------------|---------------:|
| piedmont         | with fi        | 3.0             |            4.4 |             3.3 | 4.5             |            3.5 |             5   | 4.6             |            6.2 |            5.2 |             6.1 | 3.9             |            1.2 |
| lombardy         | with fi        | 2.2             |            4.6 |             3.5 | 4.1             |            3.4 |             3.6 | 3.8             |            5.9 |            4.3 |             5   | 3.8             |            1.1 |
| veneto           | with fi        | 3.6             |            5.4 |             5.4 | 6.8             |            5   |             5   | 6.4             |            7.8 |            5.6 |             6.4 | 4.9             |            1.7 |
| emilia - romagna | with fi        | 4.8             |            4.8 |             2.7 | 3.7             |            3.4 |             2.8 | 3.9             |            5.8 |            4.3 |             4.7 | 3.8             |            1.1 |
| tuscany          | with fi        | 2.5             |            4.8 |             3.2 | 4.2             |            3.3 |             3.3 | 3.7             |            5.9 |            4.2 |             4.6 | 4.8             |            1.1 |
| lazio            | with fi        | 4.2             |            4.7 |             4.8 | 6.7             |            4.8 |             7.1 | 7.8             |            6.9 |            4.8 |             5.5 | 6.1             |            1.5 |
| campania         | with fi        | 9.7             |            8   |             6.8 | 8.5             |            7.5 |             7   | 6.7             |            6.8 |            6.5 |             8.7 | 9.4             |            3.6 |
| apulia           | with fi        | 5.6             |            7.6 |             6   | 6.2             |            6.8 |             8.1 | 7.8             |            7.8 |            7.9 |             9.1 | 6.5             |            2   |
| calabria         | with fi        | 9.0             |            9   |             9.4 | 13.3            |            9.5 |             9.6 | 10.4            |            7.7 |            8.2 |             9.3 | 9.4             |            4.1 |
| sicily           | with fi        | 19.0 (1996)     |            8.1 |             7.9 | 24.3 (2001)     |           14.4 |            14   | 18.7 (2006)     |           10   |            9.4 |            11.9 | 12.5 (2008)     |            2.8 |

Question:
What is the average value of the 2001 general election across all regions in Italy?


id: f19e3c32d88171eb59e66dc31967bf2d
qtype: NumericalReasoning
label: 6.16