Task: Table-QA (source dataset: TableBench)

Task: 
You are given a table containing structured data and a natural language question referring to the table. Your goal is to analyze the table and provide an accurate and concise answer based on the given data.

Instructions:
1. Understand the Table: Examine the structure, headers, and data in the table. Identify relevant columns and rows related to the question.
2. Interpret the Question: Determine whether the question requires direct retrieval, aggregation, comparison, sorting, filtering, or inference.
3. Extract the Answer: Use logical reasoning and numerical operations (if necessary) to derive the correct response from the table.
4. Format the Answer: No explanation, return the answer in a structured JSON format: {"answer": <answer>}. If the question cannot be answered due to missing or ambiguous data, return a JSON response with {"answer": null}.

Table:
|   election | leader            |   of seats won |   of national votes | % of national vote   |   of prefectural votes | % of prefectural vote   |
|-----------:|:------------------|---------------:|--------------------:|:---------------------|-----------------------:|:------------------------|
|       1956 | ichirō hatoyama   |             61 |            11356874 | 39.7%                |               14353960 | 48.4%                   |
|       1959 | nobusuke kishi    |             71 |            12120598 | 41.2%                |               15667022 | 52.0%                   |
|       1962 | hayato ikeda      |             69 |            16581637 | 46.4%                |               17112986 | 47.1%                   |
|       1965 | eisaku satō       |             71 |            17583490 | 47.2%                |               16651284 | 44.2%                   |
|       1968 | eisaku satō       |             69 |            20120089 | 46.7%                |               19405546 | 44.9%                   |
|       1971 | eisaku satō       |             62 |            17759395 | 44.5%                |               17727263 | 44.0%                   |
|       1974 | kakuei tanaka     |             62 |            23332773 | 44.3%                |               21132372 | 39.5%                   |
|       1977 | takeo fukuda      |             63 |            18160061 | 35.8%                |               20440157 | 39.5%                   |
|       1980 | masayoshi ōhira   |             69 |            23778190 | 43.3%                |               24533083 | 42.5%                   |
|       1983 | yasuhiro nakasone |             68 |            16441437 | 35.3%                |               19975034 | 43.2%                   |
|       1986 | yasuhiro nakasone |             72 |            22132573 | 38.58%               |               26111258 | 45.07%                  |
|       1989 | sōsuke uno        |             36 |            17466406 | 30.70%               |               15343455 | 27.32%                  |
|       1992 | kiichi miyazawa   |             68 |            20528293 | 45.23%               |               14961199 | 33.29%                  |
|       1995 | yōhei kōno        |             46 |            10557547 | 25.40%               |               11096972 | 27.29%                  |
|       1998 | keizō obuchi      |             44 |            17033851 | 30.45%               |               14128719 | 25.17%                  |
|       2001 | junichiro koizumi |             64 |            22299825 | 41.04%               |               21114727 | 38.57%                  |
|       2004 | junichiro koizumi |             49 |            16797686 | 30.03%               |               19687954 | 35.08%                  |
|       2007 | shinzō abe        |             37 |            16544696 | 28.1%                |               18606193 | 31.35%                  |
|       2010 | sadakazu tanigaki |             51 |            14071671 | 24.07%               |               19496083 | 33.38%                  |
|       2013 | shinzō abe        |             65 |            18460404 | 34.7%                |               22681192 | 42.7%                   |

Question:
If the number of national votes in 1965 was increased by 10%, how many national votes would there be?


id: 1c1d37530bd2c11ec40404ff6b0089ec
qtype: NumericalReasoning
label: 19341839