Task: Table-QA (source dataset: FinQA)

Task: 
You are given a table containing structured data and a natural language question referring to the table. Your goal is to analyze the table and provide an accurate and concise answer based on the given data.

Instructions:
1. Understand the Table: Examine the structure, headers, and data in the table. Identify relevant columns and rows related to the question.
2. Interpret the Question: Determine whether the question requires direct retrieval, aggregation, comparison, sorting, filtering, or inference.
3. Extract the Answer: Use logical reasoning and numerical operations (if necessary) to derive the correct response from the table.
4. Format the Answer: No explanation, return the answer in a structured JSON format: {"answer": <answer>}. If the question cannot be answered due to missing or ambiguous data, return a JSON response with {"answer": null}.

Table:
| Unnamed: 0                            | amount ( in millions )   |
|:--------------------------------------|:-------------------------|
| 2010 net revenue                      | $ 5051                   |
| mark-to-market tax settlement sharing | -196 ( 196 )             |
| purchased power capacity              | -21 ( 21 )               |
| net wholesale revenue                 | -14 ( 14 )               |
| volume/weather                        | 13                       |
| ano decommissioning trust             | 24                       |
| retail electric price                 | 49                       |
| other                                 | -2 ( 2 )                 |
| 2011 net revenue                      | $ 4904                   |

Question:
what is the percentage change in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?


pre_text: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .
post_text: the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .
see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases .
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors .
weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers .
industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 .
entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions .
increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments .
the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .
the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 .
these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .
label: -0.0291
qa: answer: -2.9%
ann_table_rows: 1
9
steps: op: minus1-1
arg1: 4904
arg2: 5051
res: -147
op: divide1-2
arg1: #0
arg2: 5051
res: -2.9%
program: subtract(4904, 5051), divide(#0, 5051)
gold_inds: table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5051 ;
table_9: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 4904 ;
exe_ans: -0.0291
tfidftopn: text_0: entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
program_re: divide(subtract(4904, 5051), 5051)
model_input: table_1
the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 5051 ;
table_4
the net wholesale revenue of amount ( in millions ) is -14 ( 14 ) ;
table_9
the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 4904 ;