Legal Document Type: Legal Motion: MOTION FOR EVIDENCE SUBMISSION, NOTICE OF JUDICIAL ERROR, AND FORMAL INCLUSION OF KELLY TRUELOVE, and JOZEF HANRATTY

Case Information: Case 24SN-DR00104 | Status: OverRuled

Document Content:
COMES NOW, Micheal Salmon, Petitioner, and submits the following evidence and motion to formally tie Kelly Truelove to the present case, document procedural manipulation, and highlight judicial oversight regarding perjury committed by Jozef Hanratty and Attorney Joshua Garrett. In support of this motion, Petitioner states as "follows": 1. Evidence "Submission": Notice to Pay or Quit from Kelly Truelove ● Petitioner received a "Notice to Pay or Quit for Non-Payment of Rent" from Kelly's legal counsel. ● This notice is the first form of communication received from her, despite Petitioner's multiple attempts to arrange payment, which have been systematically obstructed. ● The notice states that April will be the final month of tenancy but fails to specify the exact amount owed, demonstrating bad-faith intent rather than an attempt to resolve the matter. ● The notice also declares that legal action will begin on April 1st, aligning with Petitioner's preparation to file in Kansas, where proper jurisdiction exists. 2. Procedural Manipulation and Inclusion of Kelly Truelove ● Kelly Truelove has intentionally delayed communications and manipulated circumstances to gain an unfair advantage in litigation. ● Given that housing and financial stability are directly relevant to this custody case, her involvement is critical and should be officially acknowledged by the court. ● The court should note her role in strategically delaying payments and controlling financial leverage to influence ongoing legal proceedings unfairly.  3. Judicial Error & Perjury by Jozef Hanratty and Joshua Garrett ● Jozef Hanratty provided knowingly false testimony, which has been acknowledged as false by the court but was still used to justify an unfavorable temporary order. ● Attorney Joshua Garrett has facilitated this perjury and has misrepresented facts before the court. ● The judge’s failure to act on this perjury while continuing to enforce orders based on knowingly false testimony constitutes a cl