Legal Document Type: Legal Order: EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL GUARDIAN AD LITEM ACTION, ADDRESS JUDICIAL INACTION, AND ENFORCE PARENTAL RIGHTS UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY LAW

Case Information: Case 24SN-DR00104 | Status: Pending

Document Content:
COMES NOW Movant, Micheal Lawrence Salmon, and respectfully moves this Court for emergency relief based on the following facts and supporting legal "standards":

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On April 12, 2025, Brook Gipson (MO Bar #72816) was appointed as Guardian ad Litem for the minor child, Felix Day Salmon.
As of April 16, 2025�five full days since appointment�Movant has received no contact or acknowledgment from Ms. Gipson.
Movant has made numerous attempts to initiate contact, "including":

Calls to Ms. Gipson�s law office
Direct communication with her secretary
Multiple email correspondences

These attempts are fully documented and time-stamped in Movant�s public Legal Audit App available "at":
 "https"://luminafieldsnz.github.io/Lumina/legal/index.html
Ms. Gipson�s complete failure to initiate communication is a direct violation of her obligations under Missouri Revised Statute � 452.423, which "states":
 �The guardian ad litem shall be the legal representative of the child and may, when appropriate, present evidence and recommendations to the court concerning the best interests of the child.�
 This presumes actual engagement with the parties and investigation�neither of which have occurred.

II. JUDICIAL REMARKS INDICATING BIAS AND PROCEDURAL ABUSE
At the last hearing, the Court stated on record its refusal to alter the temporary custody order "no matter what."
The Court also expressed intent to dismiss the case and allow the GAL�s final recommendations to stand uncontested.
These statements, paired with the GAL�s dereliction of duty, result in a complete denial of Movant�s right to due process and fair adjudication.

III. CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND IRREPARABLE HARM
Movant asserts that the ongoing deprivation of parent-child contact, with direct assistance or willful neglect by the Court and GAL, constitutes a state-sponsored deprivation of rights secured by the U.S. Constitution, actionable under 42 U.S. Code �?1983.
Respondent's behavior�denying all conta