Legal Document Type: Legal Evidence: Evidence of Intentional Interference with Parenting Time

Case Information: Case 24SN-DR00104 | Status: Granted

Document Content:
Comes now, Petitioner, Micheal Lawrence Salmon, and submits this Motion to Reaffirm the Court�s Access to All Case Evidence and Witness Testimony. This motion serves as a formal reiteration of previously provided access to all case materials, including text messages, video evidence, witness statements, and a chronological timeline of events, which have been made available to the Court at the following "link":
"nhttps"://luminafieldsnz.github.io/Lumina/legal/index.html

Despite multiple prior submissions and an in-person walkthrough of this platform during the last court hearing, the Court has continued to disregard the evidence provided. The Petitioner has attempted to comply with the Court�s directives regarding witness testimony; however, due to the Court�s refusal to transfer this case to the appropriate jurisdiction, Petitioner�s witnesses remain unable to travel the 8-hour distance required to testify in person.
This motion serves as a direct response to the Court�s failure to acknowledge four previous requests for a jurisdictional transfer and its ongoing dismissal of available digital evidence that eliminates the necessity of in-person witness travel.

To review the evidence, navigate to the Crycella tab on the provided web platform. Click on the Open Folder button, then open the Videos folder. Within these recordings, the Court will observe direct proof that Petitioner is not even permitted to sing a nursery rhyme to his child without Crycella�s emotional instability leading to an abrupt disconnection, demonstrating a pattern of bad-faith parenting and obstruction of court-ordered parenting time.
Additionally, despite the Court�s directive to discuss financial barriers to the Layne Project with Mr. Garrett, Petitioner�s attempts at communication have been ignored entirely. Furthermore, when Petitioner sought clarification from Crycella, she explicitly stated her refusal to consider any alternative supervised visitation centers, despite multiple good-faith p