Legal Document Type: Legal Motion: MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON JUDICIAL AND PROCEDURAL MISCONDUCT

Case Information: Case 24SN-DR00104 | Status: OverRuled

Document Content:
COMES NOW, Micheal Lawrence Salmon, Pro Se, and moves this Court to dismiss all pending matters in this case due to the pervasive judicial and procedural misconduct that has obstructed my right to due process and a fair hearing. The actions of the Court, the Clerk�s office, and opposing counsel have created an environment of bias and unfairness that renders further proceedings in this case unjust and unconstitutional.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Judicial "Misconduct":
The Court has consistently ignored or misrepresented my motions, evidence, and arguments, despite my compliance with all procedural rules and deadlines.
The Court has failed to address the Clerk�s misconduct, including the refusal to schedule my motions on designated Motion Days and the misrepresentation of hearing dates.
Clerk�s "Misconduct":
The Clerk�s office has repeatedly obstructed my access to the court "by":
Refusing to schedule my Emergency Motion on the proper Motion Day (March 14, 2025).
Misrepresenting the hearing date as April 7, 2025, which is not a valid Motion Day.
Failing to provide public records requested under the Missouri Sunshine Law.
Abusing Pro se Judge communications.
Obstructing the appeals process.
Opposing Counsel�s "Misconduct":
Mr. Josh Garrett, counsel for the opposing party, has engaged in bad-faith tactics, "including":
Ignoring my attempts to communicate and resolve issues related to financial barriers to custody.
Submitting edited video evidence and relying on false testimony to mislead the Court.
Facilitating perjury in the face of evidence, and conspiring to kidnap.
Coaching Crycella on emotional manipulation techniques
Systemic Bias and Unfair "Treatment":
The cumulative effect of these actions demonstrates a pattern of bias and unfair treatment that has deprived me of my right to due process and a fair hearing.
The Court�s refusal to address these issues has created an appearance of impropriety and undermined public confidence in the integrity of the judicial system.