Legal Document Type: Legal Motion: EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF PARENTING TIME, CONTEMPT, AND IMMEDIATE RELIEF

Case Information: Case 24SN-DR00104 | Status: Pending

Document Content:
I, Micheal Lawrence Salmon, as the Movant in the above-referenced case, formally submit this request for judicial review and immediate forwarding of this matter to the appellate court due to procedural irregularities and judicial obstruction that have severely impacted my ability to receive a fair and impartial hearing. In support of this request, I state the "following":
Unaddressed Critical Evidence
The only remaining evidence being used against me is an edited video that has yet to be ruled on by this Court. The refusal to make a determination on this evidence directly impacts the integrity of this case and my ability to properly defend myself.
Ignored Emergency Motion for Charges
I filed an Emergency Motion for Charges, and various Subpoenas requesting phone records to expose illegal conversations between Kelly Truelove, Jozef Hanratty, Josh Garrett, and Crycella Freitag. This motion remains ignored, despite its clear relevance in establishing collusion and perjury within these proceedings.
Judicial Obstruction and Procedural Violations
The Court has consistently ignored my motions while granting those of the opposing party, allowing unchecked perjury, and failing to rule on critical evidence that would dismantle the basis for the custody determination.
The custody order itself is founded on documented collusion, conspiracy, and perjury�facts which this Court has been presented with repeatedly but refuses to address.
Additionally, the Court�s persistent refusal to allow me to properly present my case, prepare my arguments, and engage in meaningful hearings constitutes a severe violation of due process.

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF PARENTING TIME, CONTEMPT, AND IMMEDIATE RELIEF
1. Background
1.1. This Court previously entered an order granting Movant specific parenting time, including scheduled in-person visits and video calls at designated times and locations.
1.2. Despite these explicit orders, Respondent has repeatedly and willfully violated the Court�