Legal Document Type: Legal Answer: RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS

Case Information: Case 24SN-DR00104 | Status: Pending

Document Content:
Comes now Movant, Micheal Lawrence Salmon, and states the following in response to Petitioner�s "objections":
Supervised visitation is unnecessary. The requirement was based on an unfair custody order that was issued on false premises. The underlying claims were dismissed without prejudice, and the order was imposed outside the proper jurisdiction.
Respondent�s objections are contradictory. Respondent claims none of the proposed providers offer supervision, yet admits at least two do but dismisses them due to distance. This contradicts the argument that no viable options exist and demonstrates obstruction rather than cooperation.
Respondent has continuously acted in bad faith to prevent my time with Felix. It has now been two months since I have been allowed to see my son, despite no valid legal justification for continued interference.
Wherefore, Respondent requests the Court immediately reinstate my parenting time and grant any further relief deemed just and proper.