Legal Document Type: Legal Motion: MOTION TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE OF EVICTION DISMISSAL AS PROOF OF CONSPIRACY AND LACK OF LEGAL BASIS

Case Information: Case 24SN-DR00104 | Status: Granted

Document Content:
NOW COMES Movant, Micheal Salmon, pro se, and respectfully submits into evidence the official court dismissal of the eviction action filed against him by Kelly Truelove, which directly undermines the opposing party�s claims regarding his living situation and exposes a pattern of conspiracy and bad faith litigation. In support of this motion, Movant states as "follows":
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The basis for Counter-Respondent�s claims against Movant has been the false assertion that Movant�s living situation was unstable, a claim purportedly supported by an eviction proceeding initiated by Kelly Truelove.
On 03/21/2025, the eviction case filed by Kelly Truelove was officially dismissed.
This dismissal, occurring without an adjudication on the merits, demonstrates that the eviction claim itself was either legally unfounded or strategically abandoned, undermining any assertion that Movant�s residence was unstable or unsuitable for parenting time.
EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION AND BAD FAITH
Counter-Respondent, through her attorney Josh Garrett, has relied on the purported eviction to bolster her case against Movant, despite lacking any valid legal foundation.
Attorney Josh Garrett has admitted to direct communication with Kelly Truelove regarding Movant�s residence, indicating a coordinated effort to fabricate instability in order to justify denying Movant custody rights.
The involvement of multiple parties in propagating this false narrative constitutes a deliberate conspiracy to prejudice Movant�s case through fraudulent claims and misuse of legal procedures.
This Court has a duty to recognize and act upon evidence of bad faith litigation tactics, particularly where such actions have materially impacted Movant�s parental rights and due process protections.
LEGAL ARGUMENT
The submission of evidence demonstrating fraud upon the court and coordinated deception is both relevant and necessary for the just resolution of this case.
Courts have an inherent authority to sanction parties wh