good to be here and thank you all for coming i'd like to extend my own personal thanks to to to manage and to the sponsors of this event because i know without their generous support we wouldn't be here this evening as fran mentioned my background is in basic molecular biology argues genetic engineering methods as a routine virtually daily method in my research of gene organization and control and development of human gene therapy applications and it's from that background that i view also the developments of genetic engineering the use of genetic engineering within an agricultural context so what i will do th thing i will look at the source is a mechanisms of the health risks that are associated from g m foods and also their associated pesticides focusing particularly  trust sunday a pediatrician at new york university school of medicine isn't that when you study anyway it's a matter he said that these results suggest that regulating under current destructive chemicals could produce substantial economic benefit but what about the health benefit that would be less than the cost of implementing safer alternatives and producing the economic benefits clearly we need for the research but there is a greater than ninety nine percent probability that these chemicals contribute to disease he's absolutely right the studies but there are some very good studies that show that really indicate that even at low doses of a second act as an in the current destructive chemical in in frog and chick embryos it can interfere with a to large amounts of round up because they're growing so much g m soy in that country these days and then in these tissue culture cell experiments life is safe for me has been shown very very clearly to mimic the effect of  augment the function of instruction resulting in hormone dependent human breast cancer cell grows so in other words not only some human breast cancers as some of you may be aware are dependent on growth on east region evidence to show that these actions can be even more toxic than the active ingredient in this case clot for sets itself up to a thousand one hundred to a thousand times more toxic and the regulator doesn't regulate for these when a farmer sprays the crop or when you use your round up or some others pesticide spraying your garden your spraying a mixture all these and humans and so what we are exposed to is not just going to say say and again they they showed again that the round up formulation as a whole was one hundred times more toxic than delightful sites alone in killing the cells and that the level of toxicity began  concentration that is permitted in australian drinking water not a good thing in terms of what's generally present in the human population you'll hear more from the following speaker from this but just to say that there are very few studies that have been conducted looking at our body burden of the life of say in different regions around the world but what generally we're finding is that north american levels are dismiss these levels they simply dismiss them why because well it's well below the safe regulatory safe limits therefore nothing to worry about these are studies of human subjects in germany if you look at the top there's so other levels detected today in humans which are below regulatory safe limits are they safe or not there's only one study that has been published which has actually address this and this is a study from professor alina's lab in france  which basically was an extension of the ninety day feeding study with the same g m o corn conducted by monsanto but what he incorporated in the study was the very first evaluation of round up a full formula not just going to say alone what i'm afraid there was not only was the g m o corn the g m o corn plus round up showing toxic effects but the lowest dose round up group also showed signs of liver and kidney toxicity escalation of these signs of disruption and there was a trend increase in memory tumor incidence in the females this is the days to you know it was a two year study the black line here shows the trend in increase memory chuma as in the control group not receiving this tiny dose of round up in their drinking water and the red line is what they chew marine students in the females receiving this fifty part petroleum gland for say on a daily basis in their drinking water this is a statistic be the straight in drinking water guideline of twenty eleven says is of no is can be permitted and when you look at what the daily dose was the ate the daily intake in these rats but still risk suffered these extreme illnesses the liver and kidney damage the picture a tree damage the homeowner limb balance and the increased trend in trim or incidence when you look at what these rats were actually consuming on a daily basis they were tens to hundreds of thousands of times lower than what the regulator has set for us as an acceptable daily intake as something safe to consume on a daily basis so how do i account for this i believe it's because clive to say these miniscule doses is acting as an end to current destructive chemical i don't know of another mechanism where this can come about but we're conducting more research to try and really now that for sure so is monsanto right to sql aim there is no evidence of underground destruction from god to say i would say that that is highly questionable is the regulator has is the regulator up to date with the science to say that we can consume this on a daily basis and it not be talks and say i would say that that is also highly questionable s conclusion in summary i would say that based on the current evidence alone say i safe dose for blood for so round up is actually on and that we should simply withdraw it from the market and in terms of g m owes in general because that for me this evening to i believe that the studies conducted to date show clear evidence of toxicity especially to liver and kidney function in controlled animal feeding studies including even on a short term basis what is causing we need to conduct we need to withdraw i would i would go as far as say that since it has not been possible you cannot play based on the inadequacy of the tests requested  so what i will do this evening i will look at the source is a mechanisms of the health risks there are associated from g m foods and also there are associated pesticides focusing particularly herbicides obviously we are and we do have a short period of time this evening if you wish to follow up any of the points that i'll be raising this evening in greater detail please go onto the internet to the earth open source website and husband have three children all of whom suffered some level a vaccine injury one has a point that's a very impertinent disability she is passionate about educating others about the dangers and in africa sees a vaccines and about the corruption behind she is an active member of a local organizations named families for early on to some treatment and she and her husband are co founders of these the davis mind institute here in sacramento ca and i thank you she and i five side by side against a b twenty one on the line just a few short years ago and here we are again fighting once more to protect parental rights and medical choice freedom here in california please welcome my dear friend and colleague laura hank today marks a sad day in the history of california today is a day where we have had to come from near and far to oppose medical tyranny and to fight for what is rightfully ours the right to decide what we allow into our bodies and the bodies of our children our right is under fierce attack by the very people we elected to protect our rights if the right to decide what goes into our bodies and those of our children is wrongfully taken from us what meaningful rights do we have how did we arrive at this place in time where the two seven seven become police will be required to forcibly take our children against our will to the force of vaccination with scores of vaccines by doctors and nurses who have sworn to first do no harm and who are ethically and legally rick hired to obtain prior voluntary and informed consent for any and all medical procedures including vaccination how how has it come to this i will tell you how it begins with lies lies the fact beings are miraculously safe and effective for all unlike any other drug or medical procedure which is especially unbelievable as there are well over one hundred of them why the vaccines are sole responsible for eradicating certain diseases why that vaccines have been properly tested both individually and in the combinations in which there is ministered by the pharmaceutical companies don't have corrupt influence over government regulators why that vaccine research is without fraud lies that fraudulent vaccine research is true that toxic back to an ingredient are safe lies denying cover up of the call the link between vaccines and the endless list of conditions now crippling the health development and well being of our effects injuries and deaths are tracked why that our nation has a program in place that takes care of the vaccine injured why even though no doctor and no company is liable for the truth why the pharmaceutical companies behave ethically when it comes to that scene despite multimillion and multibillion dollar lawsuit one against them for fraud and deception year in and year out why that vaccine injury is rare let's have a show and one more time if you have at least one vaccine in your child that does not look rare to me  that vaccines don't harm and don't kill lies the vaccines never cause autism and also don't cause seizure disorders learning and behavioral disorders als not life threatening food allergies ticks cancer type one diabetes juvenile rheumatoid arthritis paralysis and more that lengthy list reminds me of the sa being the leading cause of coincidences in the world was lies and more lies that is how we have arrived at this day today where our legislators think they have the right to disregard and unto the constitution the right to ignore that which our country was founded upon religious freedom specifically the freedom to think believe and practice in our own way the right to defy international codes of ethics such as the nuremberg code which prohibits force medical treatments and procedures of any kind including vaccination our legislators also seem to think they have the right to violate sacred god given parental rights and the right to insist that millions of parents all sub it to a one size fits all prescription makes them scores of prescriptions which have a long undeniable history of harming disabling and killing we must ask these legislators what constitutional powers have been bestowed upon you to mandate that i must inject my child with known narrow toxins known carcinogens ingredients proven to disrupt and destroy both the nervous and immune system ingredients that will destroy my child's good and gastrointestinal tract ingredients that you senators and assembly members wouldn't allow in your morning cup of coffee but that we must inject into our children one of legal or moral authority gives you the right to mandate that i must allow risky medical procedures for my child numerous times over the course of eighteen years procedures that have the very real potential to cause great harm great injury permanent disability and you don't have the right and you don't have the authority to order parents to play medical russian roulette with their children i would like to address the recurrent mention that all must be vaccinated to protect the immunocompromised the elephant in the room that refuses to be acknowledged is how and why do we have so many children and young adults today who are classified as immuno compromised could it be that the very fact being they received possibly beginning in utero and subsequently on the day of birth and at regular intervals thereafter when their blood brain barrier is were wide open and their immune systems are undeveloped and unable to handle the barrage of toxins and viruses contained in vaccines could it be that they are immunocompromised due to the vaccines they receive and our legislators propose to mandate that other children be forced back to david until everyone is beyond repair for their more for the children for seriously immunocompromised going out in public is a danger to them and their parents must decide if they need to be kept at home until reentry into social settings is possible that's the natan all children in the state of california will not protect them there always be diseases circulating to which they will be exposed including the common so there will always be those prism vaccines don't work there will always be those whose temporary partial and artificial vaccine induced immunity how wayne and is no longer present there will always be those who just received live virus vaccine who are actually contagious shutting and spreading the very diseases against which they were vaccinated there will always be a risk for those who are immuno compromised there was always the risk for everyone that does not mean that others should be forced to endure risk to supposedly protect them furthermore that is not the government's decision to make risk benefit kolker decisions must be made for children by their parents who know them best who know their present health status who know the child's family history and who know there are many many ways to protect maintain and enhance their child's health risk free ways without risk laden back scenes it is the responsibility of all parents of immunocompromised children to take the needed measures to protect their children it is not the responsibility of other children most especially if it could mean chronic illness permanent disability and for those children it is no one's right to put themselves in the position of valuing one child's life over another i am the mother of a severely vaccine and your child who is now twenty one years old he is a boy in a man's body fully dependent on others he did not complete high school or go to college  not capable of earning a living or living independently he will never get married never have children as a matter of fact my son ryan will never even go out on a first date he was wrong as ever liv a typical independent life because he was poisoned and disabled by vaccines beginning in one thousand nine hundred four continuing through nine hundred ninety eight there was no informed consent no knowledge  of his loss of skill and development of strange behaviors after every single vaccine there was no if you receive a minimum of two hundred thirty seven point five my programs  toxic mercury and neuro talk to aluminum formaldehyde anti freeze and animal cells and viruses and allergy causing food protein and known carcinogens no government agent has followed up on his vaccine injuries so the same thing happened to other children he is one of the on acknowledged uncounted  compensated ignored discounted and publicly denied victims who make up the ever increasing epidemic of vaccine injured persons there is no there is indeed an urgent public health crisis sweeping the country and it is not measles mumps or chicken pox it is vaccine injury vaccine injury is the public health crisis facing us today thank you all for coming here today to help the vaccine madness this medical fascism this oppressive tyranny this present evil risk there must be choice parental choice thank you