hi my name is our paul global mess and i'm an activist in the northwest with the political movement of the roof and last saturday i delivered a presentation and i'm going to go through some of the main points of that presentation of the american population right now is totally totally confused about the  we need to take on russia we need to take on china they're being told that things  and none of the democratic candidates and none of the republican counties are currently addressing fundamental of realities of the drift towards war with russia and china and the systemic collapse of the economy and the systemic potential blowout of the whole financial system which is based on speculation and there's there's no the discussion of how to deal with any clear discussion of this and americans are caught up with various different  being created in the media but no those which are supposed to polarize people into various different camps but but but there is no no there's nothing there that deals with the underlying reality of what the american people are actually going through and what they're actually beginning to go through or are are in the process of going through and so there's no clarity there's no strategic clarity in the population about what to do the world really is all about what's really happening and everything is hollow you know all these pop things are hollow and people most people are just turning off and and and saying you know i give up on that i'm going to pay attention to this or on you know maybe i'll get him emotionally connected just one of the candidates and maybe we'll do differ but it but there is no coherence for the american average person from for the vast majority of people in our society and so we are we're looking at a situation in which  that is incoherent to the average person united states and we live in a world up until the fall of the soviet union were things were very defined as it was it was to free world allegedly versus the car i'm curtain of the soviet system the communists the warsaw pact and these two blocs were gauged and oh i our competition for dominance on the on on the planet or for influence in the on the planet and that the area of conflict was primarily ended in the area of the poor nations what was called the third world or the south or the nonaligned movement these are all the nations of of latin america africa i doubt time most of asia and the middle east and this dismay at that the so called free world had to be concerned at least partly for a while for of the southern neighbors although they were exploiting their economically they nonetheless and because of it they went too far they would lose them to the communist block and that many people were going to moscow and beijing to get their education were coming back to their countries and and were involved in organizing for socialist revolution system by bringing the united states and the soviet union into collaboration for global development and it and that op those attempts  failed kennedy was assassinated and ronald reagan was assassinated though he recovered but his recovery was very slow and during that period the opposing view of a permanent confrontation around the bush soviet union is two visions for the future now we're talking pretty much twenty five years ago twenty twenty two twenty five years ago you had two different visions of the world one of those visions is  vision associated with the elites of europe and united states and this vision was on to a large degree  and the concept in this book which we really became the policy of the transatlantic system is that and i'll quote you from the book the french translation for the directions further on these differences make it possible to draw the ideological line which separation north from the new barbarians to their car and solve the new barbarians and they're using t and so they call for a system of walls between north and self which marks the beginning of a new type of world wide apartheid the idea of effort to keep the size of the world population within bounds will be supplanted by a hope that at least the masses of the south will be curbed people will set their hopes on catastrophes which can regulate so they are proposing a system of total lawlessness and chaos in the solve it because they no longer have to the population and leave though area sort of as a no man's land of of of warlords and an end warfare in illness and spam in starvation and what have and and so on to quote further our regime is marked for to set into total chaos when first a tourist stay away and then the journalists deliberately bombed two major humanitarian are hospitals of doctors without borders one in afghanistan and want to name and i think they're trying to communicate that prove that concept to  these are pesky doctors without borders organizations which are determined to be there for helping people today we are witnessing the extinction of entire cities and then he talks about france fun on and the hatred of this off towards the north as put forward in the finance book wretched of the earth and he speaks of the  are driven in millions by hunger from the countryside to the city he says the erection of a borderline accord on stability lemus which is a war which isolates the world of the north and the south from each other will have a calming effect in the face of catastrophes which are so obvious we brewing there and face the hostility which the south regards to north the impoverished s now so that's one vision of the world for the post soviet period another vision it came into being around the same time and this vision was articulated by the end of the and western europe gauging massive development of russia eastern europe and china and that and from there and the middle east and the rest of the world and not developing it should be based on building that connectivity of of of railways to integrate the economic space and this was t cornerstone says two thousand and twelve two thousand and thirteen of the president of china g d p and this perspective is called the one belt one road and around that perspective and adjacent to that perspective you have a similar perspective emerging in russia something which is called the eurasian union and that similar perspective is is that also feeding into the creation of a year ago last july of the brics nations around which a new development banks are being set up outside of wall street in the city of london and we're financed these connectivity and the development of the starve and die and the other is where the vast majority of the human race undergoes a true dramatic transition out of poverty into an educated middle class existence and the chinese are ten to have the world our party as a whole through this process of rapid development first the effort structure and denby the materials and then bringing in their science and technology to a pen to have world poverty for the most part within within fifteen years from now already the chinese are have brought up six hundred million people out of poverty that's almost twice the entire population of the united states that's a different vision of the world and the question now is so from that standpoint the entire neo now to z and climate change different contending systems which are now coming to a head you see the refugee problem in europe you see the countries calling for walls to be set up to keep the refugees up to refugees which are in other girl wars which break the country parcel took like what happened to libya which was actually a developing country it was destroyed what happened to iraq was that they were destroyed the idea is not just to destroy these nations all these things so that there's a permanent disintegration disease famine mass starvation mass death and that is and the leader and he is the leader of this perspective while the actual policies are developed in places like great britain on the marquee of great britain and also in central europe under the of europe obama has been the president tasked to implement if necessary go into nuclear war with the brics nations with russia and china but americans have no conception of this they have no conception that that dame's it that these are that this is the juncture of these two different orientation there are no conception that that china and russia are and india are coming together for development there are no conception of this there no concession that united states could be a partner nobs because the chinese approach to this is not based on our lives or blocks american people are totally divorced from that reality from knowing that all they know from the media is that putin is a bad guy and he's trying to bring back the soviet union or the china is an evil empire of communism that wants to dominate the world that's all they know meanwhile wall street is in deep trouble the city of london financial system is in deep trouble and  and yet the american people do not have an idea of how that all works and they say there's a lot of people out there that are in favor of doing the right thing which is implementing glass steagall but  if the necessity of lasting will in the context of getting the united states to wipe out wall street save the internal potential of the united states to be part of a goal  development process so we are we are in a very very strange situation where the rest of the world is becoming hopeful about a future a living name poverty through the economic development by the year thirty three and up the american population which every day because more pessimistic more moros more dark more internal internally you know i guess you could see introver t and and then the electoral deal actions you have the rise in all of this of religious fundamentalism you see the center in the campaign of then carson right there for morality there for returning america to its virtues and who is the enemy russia and china that's a contradiction the chinese are not the enemy that the chinese people right now are very optimistic about the future of humanity if you go to china and you talk to the average chinese person they're very optimistic about the future of mankind you talk to the american there is  sorrow where is where is the united states going and all of those are we going to n development of the world is going to threaten us and threaten the planet this doubt what we environmentalists wan will surely destroy the planet with a nuclear war no doubt this is confusion this mass confusion in the populace mass confusion in united states these are the policies kerry would have supported these are  policies f d r actually articulated for mankind we were ahead of the rest of the world on all this way back so united states and its population has lost their moral orientation they've lost a future orientation and there are only concerned about his money and the star and what about the people that have nothing what about all  people who are who are who are being who are going home most now who are being driven out of their you know into decline of the real economy what about them will they all come out they go over to the category of barbarian such as we were talking about they're now the barbarians while in the barbarians because the system of economics that we have determines who has well based on financial speculation not economic development that's why it's a zero sum game and the losers are the barbarians and the winners are the rich people and you have what's his name very sad he's going to rectify that but yet he's saying we should prevent russia china from development and yet he's saying we should stop we should we should stop development because of climate change because of we need to stop carbon emissions we can't go nuclear so he's promoting policies which are anti development at the same time he's talking about taking it back america from the rich does a contradiction is the political system of the united states is so contradicted internally that we have no real presidential race so where is the solution go and that's the question i'm going to leave you