commission report did deal briefly with the issue of insider trading so they have an answer to the allegations made that there was substantial insider trading before nine eleven insider trading is taking advantage of knowledge that you have privately it's not public information it's private information that you have about a source coming event and you and you gauge in some kind of trying to financial transaction which will enable you to profit from that source coming event that other people don't know about sometimes insider trading is called informed trading it's you see it both ways for about one month after nine eleven two thousand and one there was reports in mainstream financial press of huge profits being made on the nine eleven event by four knowledge of the events ok one of the key statements being made referred to using put options a put option is in the so called option markets ok you purchase you don't actually purchase a stock you don't sell a stock or anything like that you purchase an option to do something with a stock you purchase the option forests pacific period of time to be able to in the case of a put option to be able to put the stock far sale at a spec specified price in the next six weeks the option of selling these stocks let's say buy any time before october twentieth at the designated put price far example i'm putting this on a screen in the right inside it so happens that american stock and united had almost the same price just by accident before nine eleven namely around thirty dollars if you knew it was going to happen on september third fourth or whatever you could go to it to a financial firm and buy a option to sell united or american stock let's say thirty dollars any time until october twentieth and you know or you think you know that the stock is going to go down when it comes to let's say september sixteenth or eighteenth or whatever ok you can decide to to buy the stock if you don't already have it you buy american airlines in a same day same hour same second you sell it you're buying it if you're looking at the screen now you're buying it under twenty dollars and you had the option to sell it at thirty you made ten dollars buying put options cost you money itself of course right i mean it's not free in my car should dollar might cost you two dollars open interest tells you at the end of a day or in the middle a day or whatever of how many contracts there are out there for a specific strike a strike price for a specific expiration day the level of open interest changes from two from three factors first of all people buying options that's obvious that's what i've already described you buy a put option but you can also sell a put option i could buy a put option like it's you could say i want it you can pay me a price and i'll sell it to you that's a sale of a put option ok unfortunately the data most of us of the publicly available doesn't tell you the difference between by buying a put option and might and you are selling to put i mean it's not going to go the wrong way are you know whatever and i can decide on september seventh to exercise the option and that means that that open interest now will decline at the end of the day a quintile will econometric studies one of which was published five years ago two second of which was published just a few months ago and the third of which is not even submitted for publication but will be submitted very shortly these are done by economy traditions addressing the issue about whether there could be insider trading earned trading before nine eleven first of all you looks at the change in the open interest and i'm going to focus on american and united stocks looks at the change and open in to us on american the night it's stocks for a very short period september fifth to december tenth and he looks at it at the change in open interest which i've told you about far those four trading days fifth sixth seventh and tenth is looking at four trading days looking at the change in  interest for those days he compares that with a benchmark period of one hundred and twenty six trading days before that to see whether they are unusual for that stock he compares it to one thousand pieces of data on that on the five thousand largest corporations between january second  ninety to september fourth two thousand and one to get this frequency distribution i was referring to and therefore to be able to get this idea of where the quint shells are for the transactions that are occurring and put options for american and united airlines that result would only a have occurred on september tenth for american airlines one percent of the time there was ninety nine out of one hundred cases you would not have seen on september tenth what you actually did observe in september tenth he inferred from that that that was evidence of informed or insider trading on american airlines on september tenth he looks at spikes and put option trading on fourteen comp companies over a ten year period and after all of us assisting goal stuff this summer is tier they find that there are only thirty seven in all of those and all of that ten year period for fourteen stocks is only thirty seven events to be identified as possibly informed or insider trading whatever word you prefer to use only thirty seven they're not focusing on nine eleven but it is there is in the period of nine eleven if frequency that such a value occurred based upon and then they look at the t period prior history of that day they look back two years for that stock option over two years and see what was that particularly unusual or  not for example american and they cite american american on september tenth had occurred at that level or more only five prior times in prior to years they find out that out of the thirty seven cases that they are able to identify thirty three out of thirty seven actually occurred before a real event which was  you realize you're dealing with something prior to an event so how would you know unless you have inside information that that event is going to happen ok thirty three out of thirty seven ca have to do with this subsequent event only four does not have to do with it they can identify it as a doing the subsequent event thirteen of the thirty three center around nine eleven the nine eleven commission report says it did a careful investigation of what i've just been talking about namely insider trading in put options on american airlines and on united airlines ok and it says for these two stocks before nine eleven we found no evidence of insider trading in spite of the fact that it seems to be suspicious that these papers are not contested to the best of my scientist ok and i'm making this statement about the government failing to follow scientific evidence but it's not it's not like you know physical evidence about the world trade centers and so it's it's a different kind of evidence is evidence of my a presentation today is eye witnesses and evidence of explosives at the pentagon the official story as represented in the nine eleven commission report is that it was a surprise pearl harbor like attack which was claimed to be a kamikaze plane attack on the west outer wall of the pentagon by arab muslim terrorists who it is alleged were in control of flight seventy seven a large commercial seven fifty seven airliner and the claim is at exactly nine thirty seven  forty six seconds it diagonally penetrated through three of five rings to the inside of the middle ring only causing a single exit hole on the inside of the middle c ring the west side of the pentagon  the official story claims that a flight seventy seven came in at a bleak angle and did not hit a building straight on became in it at an oblique angle and parts of the plane at least it is claimed went all the way through three hundred ten feet and according to donald rumsfeld he made the claim that the nose of the plane poked itself out of the inside of the middle or c ring the first claim is that it was a surprise per like harbor pearl harbor like attack but the pentagon i now know from interviewing eyewitnesses expected a terrorist attack on the building that morning but with explosives of some kind of bomb sniffing dog teams were at the pentagon metro stop at least as early as seven thirty a personally interviewed a fort monmouth t t y auditor named michael nielsen as well as the army the very famous army area survivor april gallop for two hours with under oath testimony on videotape and they both stated that there were bomb sniffing dog teams in the metro stop at approximately seven thirty that morning and then if they left the metro stop and and presumably they were still there so the pentagon expects spec did some kind of an attack apparently with explosives that the dog teams were sniffing for that moment we have pretty good interest pretty good idea from one of the nine eleven commission staff reports the team eight report which was the one that investigated the response or i would say non response of norad on the morning of nine eleven and anything connected with the pentagon and they did an interview many interviews but one of them and it's now released you can see this entire report on the web from the national archives released that captain on the morning of nine eleven was the acting head of the military command center quote had no awareness of american airlines seventy seven coming back to washington d c his first awareness of any problem was a call from rumsfeld's own three star aide that's a very high level officer who asked if he lied and felt the explosion in the building and asked lighting two to investigate it now here's another big hint the confirmed again by i still f b i director robert mueller in time magazine just this may ninth the f b i s i o c strategic operations center filled to capacity on nine eleven and remained that way through pan to bomb for pentagon twin towers and bombing now that's very fascinating because the official story of course in the nine eleven commission report and all the media that follows their lead is that bombs really weren't involved at the world trade centers or the pentagon there is in fact major damage and deaths in the innermost a and b rings of the pentagon in the west section for instance in the a ring i didn't again going back to the interview i did with  secretary of defense for special operations on nine eleven former top army green beret officer robert andrews he told me quote my aide and i had to walk over dead bodies on the inside of the a ring and then we have  just one other example stars and stripes reporter she said i was walking on the pentagon's innermost corridor across the courtyard when the incident happened i heard two loud booms one large one smaller and the shockwave through me against the wall major to the washington post that post article shortly after nine eleven the b ring between the fourth and fifth corridors was decimated now the b ring is just second in from the inner court yard it's a whole ring in from the ceiling and we've already seen there were dead bodies and damage in the airing as well just inside the courtyard the veering between fourth and fifth quarters was decimated the heat was so intense you couldn't go in marine major to the washington post the pentagon rescue team testimony on nine eleven quote when we got into the building we started to feel the heat right away and as we walked deeper down the hallways deeper meanings and i've confirmed this with many people who work in the pentagon deeper means deeper towards the center towards the courtyard away from the alleged impact point further towards the center it was just fire everywhere not so much smoke there but fire all around us you couldn't see the plane just debris where ever you looked now the searing is where the official story says the nose or some heavy part of the plane popped just barely popped through the inside of the middle or searing but there is good evidence that the that inner city ring famous exit hole was also made by some kind of explosives probably shaped charge explosives that were put on the wall this is one of many photographs that were originally from the department of defense that are available on the web mechanical engineer michael meyer has stated categorically i'll give you his exact quote in a minute that a round clean so called in quotes exit hole is like the one seen here at the inside of the c ring is the signature of a shaped charge explosive and definitely cannot be he said it was impossible from an impact from any kind of plane debris nose heavy piece otherwise myra's spent years in aerospace structural design and the design and use of shapes shaped charge impact on the outside of the outer wall of the west side and that that diagonally impacting plane and or parts of it after the first part of the penetration this is the official story penetrated through only three of the five rings if a plane or any object any impact or would come in it in a oblique angle which the official story says and goes diagonally through three rings that you're not going to have a perfectly round exit hole if it's the front of a fuselage or even around engine it would have to impact coming perpendicular to the wall the official story of course says that there is a single exit hole on the inside of the c ring caused by whatever well in fact this is a graphic taken from the washington post immediately after nine eleven from pentagon sources d o t sources itself and when you come up afterwards you can see the key if you can't see it there but there are three exit holes listed from the pentagon's own immediate sources to the washington post after nine eleven not just one this is an aerial photograph that the pentagon provided to all the media right after nine eleven you can see it on the web this is the so called official exit hole right here but there are two others that in turn perfectly match these three so called exit holes from the pentagon's own release data and here it says exit holes april gallup a very famous witness i have done a two hour underoath videotaped interview of april gallop in that under oath to our sworn statement to me she states she states and i'm summarizing of course there were huge explosions the second that she april gallup hit the on button on her computer in the evening she said i thought it was a bomb there were two explosions she walked out of the alleged entrance hole according to the official story and yet saw no plane no plane parts no seats no passenger no luggage no smell of jet fuel no jet fuel fire no burns on her body the only fire she saw were seen coming out of the computers in a large ring around her large army work area april gallup walked out of the alleged entrance hole according to the official story with only one shoe wonder foot and the floors were not hot she said in her souls as you see now are completely on burned april gallop risking resting on the pentagon line after walking out of the alleged impact hole with one bare foot and her soles completely under it lieutenant kevin schaefer the entire command center he's referring to the naval command center the entire naval command center which was in the west wedge first floor exploded in a gigantic orange fireball i felt myself being slammed to the deck by a massive in sunder a shockwave additional witnesses and evidence is evidence to inside explosives army fort monmouth auditor michael neilson i've mentioned him before hundreds raced down the hall past me and out the south side exit shouting it's a bomb bomb it's a bomb and multiple witnesses smelled core diet which is definitely not jet fuel doesn't smell anything like it inside explosives would explain why there was no advance siren or evacuation which was one of the complaints in april gallops lawsuit against rumsfeld cheney and myers the naval command center was almost certainly targeted the washington post said so immediately after nine eleven we know the part that was targeted it was the intelligence center in this upper corner which is this is taken from here that's that corner right there and that's that corner  intelligence cell outside terrorists would have target the pentagon roof obviously and easier to be to hit command areas for instance where rumsfeld and myers worked not the national command center or the naval command center not t plot which is another apparently targeted offices or even the sparsely populated entire west wedge where the official story says that a plane impacted almost ground level because that's precisely the one side of the five sides of the building the approaches to the building that had the most physical obstacles in the way a heel an antenna light poles cycling fans and large cable spools that are in advance the government lied about inside explosions do you think it is telling the truth about the one and most famous outside explosion in the five famous frames from the two videotapes of the security cameras in the parking lot of the pentagon that the video tapes were released in the massai trial you know august of two thousand and six probably not and in fact we know not and how do we know not it's the wrong date has anyone ever noticed that that security camera video says september twelfth is also the wrong time now it is important to know that that is one of the five famous leaks frames those were leaked in early two thousand and two and a mousavi trial didn't release the videos of which these five famous frames were taken in one of the two videos that were close to each other in the in the parking lot until the mousavi trial and in two thousand and six ok so what we do know is that the wrong date is on the leaks slides which we do know that these five slides or these five frames came from one of those two security camera video tapes in the parking lot they were released four years later in the massai trial but when they were released in the mousavi trial there is no date the eighty five videos that were confiscated by the f b i there was an f and the analysis came back from the f b i itself that there were only two of the eighty five that in any way could be interpreted as showing an impact on the building and those are the two and we show and we know that they do not prove anything they have the wrong time stamp the wrong date stamp and they do not show  i represent fifteen hundred fifty architects and engineers now calling for a new investigation of the destruction of these towers why because the evidence shows and as i believe you'll see today that these all three skyscrapers were destroyed by an explosive controlled demolition how do we know that because we are using the scientific method to figure out what happened that day so we're going to apply the scientific method we formulate a question how did the towers come down we do some background research this gives us a means of developing a hypothesis our best guess as to what happened based on that research and those observations we take our best guess i think fire or jet plane impacts brought the towers down maybe controlled demolition brought them down we don't rule out anything until the evidence itself rules it out we test that hypothesis with experiments and we analyze the results and draw conclusions now i the hypothesis is corroborated we report the results in an open transparent manner and this is one of the chief failings of the the national institute for standards of standards and technology now here is some some mid rise buildings that have collapsed due to earthquakes in this case we have the building falling over to the path of least resistance it's a chaotic process note that you can see at the bottom on the ground what was a building it's recognizable as a building the structural steel components of not dismembered from each other the concrete is not poll of arised to powder this is really important because when we look at the three high rises on nine eleven we see something quite different let's take a look at controlled demolitions where explosions can be harnessed quite efficiently and we have hundreds of examples from all across the country from which to make our comparison because this is how we use we use explosives to demolish high rises so this is what a a high rise looks like while it's being demolished with explosives controlled demolition can be engineered in many different ways normally the purpose is to bring a structure down while avoiding damage to adjacent structures and to do so quite efficiently economically to typically a tall building like these are demolished by placing thousands of cutter charges throughout the columns and beams in the building and then detonating him in a very precise order progressing outward and upward synchronistically times floor by floor destroying the inner columns allows the weight of the building to pull the exteriors inward and destroy the building from the bottom up allows the weight of the building to be harnessed to do some of the destruction so the result is an implosion like you see here producing a vertical symmetrical collapse at nearly freefall acceleration into a consolidated rubble pile that's broken up and ready for loading in shipment now this is a feat that only a handful of companies in the united states can accomplish and fire by the way never has so what are the typical features we have a sudden onset of destruction usually at the base of the building we have a straight down symmetrical collapse often into the building's own footprint because demolition waves remove the columns supports in a synchronicity we have a free fall speed sometimes through the path of what was the greatest resistance the thousands of tons of structural steel in the way and we have a total dismemberment of the steel structure broken up ready for loading and shipment there's minimal damage to adjacent structures and there is sounds of explosions heard by witnesses there is flashes of light seen by witnesses enormous clouds of polarized concrete and pyro plastic smoke squibs sometimes or isolated explosive rejections that are seen in various parts of the building that are obviously explosions and of course there is chemical evidence left behind and the residue of cutter charges if you have these things any of these features you know you had an explosive demolition if you had all of  them you are really really really sure there is no question this is direct evidence of explosive destruction and guess what fire cannot create any one of them let alone all ten of them the third worst structural failure in modern history that most every architect and engineer in the united states and around the world know nothing about which is in and of itself a huge curiosity at least and more to the point what can m b m what can and what amounts to a cover up censorship by the media who knew and reported that day that this building was destroyed in fact it was destroyed at five twenty in the afternoon after the twin towers came down this is a forty seven story skyscraper that is a football field in length away from the north tower of course it was not hit by an airplane so we don't have the propaganda baggage that that we have with the twin towers because we all know how they came down is there a sudden onset of destruction at the base of the structure let's listen to dan rather narrate this as we take what may be our first look at world trade center seven's collapse now here we're going to show you a videotape of the collapse itself  cannot is there a straight down symmetrical collapse of this building into its own footprint let's look from west street i'm not quite convinced yet though let's look at side by side comparison here on the left is world trade center seven on the right is a known controlled demolition is there any similarity is there another similarity to warrant an investigation into the possible use of explosives particularly given that every high rise that has come down has come down with explosives and that no high rise has ever come down due to fires this is n'est ce computer model compare it to reality what do you see up point out about six things that i see first of all it stops two seconds into the overall collapse why well as you can see it begins to tip over had they gone they can't even get their own computer models to reflect the straight down symmetrical collapse of an engineered patterned set of explosives and you can see massive bolding an indentation at the bottom which is not reflected at all in the perimeter steel frame skeleton of the of the building what else do you see we have a massive set of failures of connections of structural steel framing that amounts to a rate of about four hundred per second failing beginning here and look almost instantly all the way up the building structural engineers will tell you that an isolated failure in a structural steel system cannot cause an instantaneous set of failures throughout vertically throughout the building and then nist claims well then that travels a lot of really but they don't even show us that but forget that just the fact that we have massive failures in the structural system throughout the height of this building and the first if the few seconds before the overall collapse what you expect to be seeing that reflected all the way up to the top and and breaking massive numbers of windows on the side how many windows do you see breaking here a couple they should all be tearing apart massively warping if we don't take out all twenty four core columns and all of the fifty or so perimeter columns at once virtually simultaneously what's going to happen that building is going to fall to the path of least resistance asymmetrically it'll fall over look at the geometry of the buildings collapse it's coming down faster and faster each second there is more speed indicating gravity is in full control here it's falling as fast as a bowling ball dropping off the side of the building do we have enormous clouds of pyro clastic like smoke and dust look at this incredible level of expanding gaseous clouds racing thirty five miles an hour in every direction away from the destruction of building seven few small office fires that you saw fueling that cauliflower like expansion of of that cloud mid rise high rise office buildings do not collapse due to fire and there's forty thousand tons of steel in world trade center building seven that steel fire proved or not will draw that heat away from its source and distribute it out through that incredible heat sink let's take a look in beijing where we had a massive fire fully engulfing a forty four story skyscraper and surely this one is going to collapse that it known before on the left after on the right the building is still standing and yet these small upis fires brought this building down after burning about four hours fema came out in two thousand and two with their report assisted by the american society of civil engineers before the nist report came out what did they say the specifics of the fires in world trade center seven and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time wait you spent six hundred thousand dollars on this report and you don't know how the building came down our best hypothesis fire plus random damage has only a low probability of occurrence wait a minute what do you do when your best hypothesis has a low probability of occurrence maybe we should come up with a new hypothesis that has a higher probability of occurrence no  they say further research investigation and analysis are needed to resolve this issue unfortunately though for those hoping to resolve the issue all of the steel except for two pieces which you're going to hear about tomorrow was sent to china for recycling before the report came came out saying hey we don't know how the building to him maybe we should look at the steel and what is jonathan barnett who did join the fema team say about  typical investigation when you have a structural failure you carefully go through the debris field looking at each item photographing every beam as it collapsed and every  column where it is in the ground and you pick them up very carefully and you look at each element we were unable to do that in the case of tower seven after we look at building seven and gain the respect of people who didn't know about it much less it's controlled demolition they're much more open to looking at the evidence with the world trade center twin towers which is actually even more clearly a controlled  demolition be at a very different one than we've seen let's start with a structure an amazing structure unique for its time an innovative structure that won awards from the american society of civil engineers and won praise from nist itself in its report this building had forty seven massive core columns at the base almost solid steel fifty two inches by twenty two inches thinning to two inches at the mid mid high and to the  the structure up at the top as little as three and seven inch thick with those steel members so when you see the building coming down in the videos realize what we're talking about here there is more the facade of this building with these fourteen inch square tube columns every three feet nine inches that marching across this building then there is windows that collapse had to come down through this steel or did it did the steel have to be removed to make way and cause for the collapse this is the north tower developing its collapse on the lower left you can see the full plume of the upward outward arching streamers the the pirate plastic like clouds and a geometry of fireworks compare that to known explosions is there any similarity here's the north tower we're told this upper block drove the rest of the building down the planes hit here there is no movement down from here and till about now once again this upper block is destroying itself in what can only be described as a miniature controlled demolition if you will of the top fifteen stories there's nothing left to drive the rest of the building down at any speed let's let's look at the structure of the upper portion is the lightest the lower portion is the heaviest let's let's compare if you if you look at newton's third law of motion there's an equal and opposite reaction against a lighter object striking a heavier object hey it's the same if you drop the lighter object on to the heavier object equal and opposite to destructive force which one will give up the ghost first obviously we're drawing a comparison here and mr chandler w discuss this more with you tomorrow but take a stop start look now stop the bands of explosions wrapping all the way around the building like the first responders describe that upper portion is destroyed first let's take a look from below a lot of violent activity with squibs isolated explosive ejections occurring underneath in a moment we'll talk about the lateral ejection of this material but take a close look now at the corner where you see developing a series of explosions rapidly advancing down the corner of the building much faster than the rest of these explosions almost as fast as the free falling objects and you'll see tomorrow how fast this building is coming down how could somebody get into this building or some group of people well if one had access to the core to the elevator shafts in the building they would have access to the core columns and names that occur in the building and it would be relatively discreet but if you had an elevator modernization going on which we did the nine months prior to nine eleven the largest one in the world in fact that might have some sort of undercover operation so this is this is a source of investigation a celebrator had this contract they had eighty five employees in the building at the time of the first plane impact and they fled and these are experts that usually help the first responders rescue the victims that we have isolated ejections occurring in the building well how about here here here what are these and this tells us that these are puffs of air being produced by that giant piston well we already saw that shine piston was destroyed any air pressure would be released upward most likely also these are occurring up to sixty stories down below this destruction let's look at the south tower it's hit thirty stories down it does begin to tip over a little bit but then it's completely destroyed and almost disintegrated in this cloud it doesn't end up in some mass on the ground below so we have asymmetrical damage from the airplanes in the fires and asymmetrical loading from this portion of the building which is continuing  theoretically falling twenty two degrees off the building and yet watch what happens below complete symmetrical destruction all the way down to the ground just like the first responders describe a pop pop pop bands of explosions the truth about nine eleven appears to be much darker than we have possibly imagined we have seen that explosives were used to destroy these three skyscrapers and of course it takes months of advance planning and engineering to place such explosives who had the means the opportunity the motive to engage in this crime who benefited these are the classic questions that crime investigators and journalists should be asking but are not and that's the purpose of the toronto hearings this week who had access to these highly secure buildings who had access to these extremely sophisticated explosives that you're going to learn about tomorrow from dr neil heron the architects and engineers for nine eleven truth don't speculate about these issues we don't have conspiracy theories in fact the laws of physics are incapable of caring about conspiracy theories the evidence we've seen tonight is just a small fraction of the vast body of information that the nine eleven truth movement has put together for you the questions raised are numerous and ominous that have yet to be answered and it's the hope of the fifteen hundred architects engineers that i represent that these hearings prove quite successful toward getting all of us a new investigation thank you so what i'd like to address in my presentation the broad consequences of nine eleven with regard to u s military doctrine but more broadly the pretext and justification which the allies surrounding nine eleven have given t waging a war of conquest under the band of what we call the war on terrorism all the global war on terrorism the global war on terrorism was launched late at night by the war cabinet which was formed and off to do in of nine eleven and a decision was taken to declare war on afghanistan as a state sponsor of the nine eleven attacks in other words a sovereign country somewhere in central asia on the grounds that  responsible for a military attack on the united states of america and what is more important is that the following morning without any evidence nobody knew who had done it at you know on on the on the same day but the following morning eastern european time in brussels the atlantico alliance m and invoked article five of the treaty of washington which essentially states that an attack on one of its members constitutes an attack on all of its members under the concept of collective defense but now immediately we see unfolding this notion of preemptive war that that this was an act of defense and as a result nato nato did actually declare war on the twelfth it waited until barely three two or three days before based on some  state department document which was composed and never verified and then they said yes we rubber stamp the decision that we took tentatively on september the twelfth but needless to say  this tragic event of nine eleven was used as a pretext and justification to wage war on the impoverished country in central asia they were diplomatic exchanges between afghanistan and the united states people say the taliban but this was the government of afghanistan whether we like them or not and they said they said to they george w bush said we don't negotiate with terrorists that was his response so that that avenue was not taken and anybody who has a minimal understanding of military planning will  that you don't plan a large scale theater war in a matter of four weeks this conference took several months to prepare and i imagine anybody who is has looked at that military documents knows that it takes several months sometimes years to prepare a wall of that size so that the war on afghanistan was in the pipeline well before nine eleven and his mobilization of public opinion and i don't think even the sectors in canada i think everybody joined the band wagon virtually everybody even trade unions progressive organizations and a few dissenting voices i community was yeah we we supported him but he went against us ok you can read that i'm quoting literally from press reports from intelligence reports it's when an intelligence asset goes against his sponsor now we were the sponsors of al qaeda it was for good calls it was to fight the communists in the soviet afghan war and we sent in the mos hobby missions into afghanistan to train these people the understanding of the intelligence community is he turned against us in the wake of the cold war jihad the i can tell you that the blowback is a fabrication bin laden's whereabouts have always been known why the costs is cia intelligence assets and has always been an intelligence assets between them nine eleven has unleashed a roadmap of war and destruction at the most serious the crossroads of the most serious crisis in modern history i think an understatement and the war on terrorism is part of that process because it gives a justification to wage war on humanitarian grounds so that  you waged the war not against countries but against what they called non state entities which came again into the into the jogen all this has put me to the consciousness of millions of people it's created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation which was then coupled with the coded alert the color coded alerts  homeland security and so on and it it it it was a pretext to wage a war without borders which in essence is a war of conquest and it was also a pretext to implemented far if if the war on terrorism is no longer accepted and doesn't have its legitimacy the whole construct military doctrine collapses like a deck of cards and that's why nine eleven truth is so important what happened on september eleventh from the standpoint of somebody who was in washington d c probably the thing that struck me the most was after september eleventh there was slick brochures magazines with photographs that appeared on the new stains immediately after september eleventh and i asked myself how did they get those pictures kind of like all of those red black and green flags that showed up overnight in libya we also as members of congress were given talking points and you all have seeing my interviews that i've done talking about these talking points the talking points basically said that the united states was here because we're free but now i think i have given you a little bit of my background and what i understood clearly was that we a and so therefore that talking point was created for another population the reason that i didn't believe the talking points and the severe orchestration that took place and sort of induction into group think that five hundred thirty five members of congress were supposed to  into was because one i understood as an african american what it means to be targeted by the united states government through the documentation provided to all of the people of the world now because it's on the internet and the cointelpro papers the counter intelligence program i also was very well aware of what the united states government would do to communities of color because there was no such thing as crack cocaine until the united states decided that they wanted to impact policy in latin america and they needed to finance it operation northwoods i called in james bamford to explain to me operation northwoods and there in my government's own writing is a most diabolical play eerily similar to what happened on september eleventh