so here's what it g m o is ok you take a gene let's say you want to create a cord plant engineered to produce its own pesticide to split over the stomach  insects and kill ok just pick one random which happens to be planted all over the country so you take genes from soil bacteria now some of the farmers and gardeners may not be too you can buy the gardening store you spray when there's an insect infestation of certain type of insects it will kill those insects it does not say also uses mouthwash it says  internally but the what happens with these biotech companies is they take the gene that produces the bt out of the bacteria and they make millions of copies and then put it into a gun and they shoot the got into a place of millions of corn cells and they clone  into a crops and those plants have a little spray bottle and every single cell so if you happen to be unfortunate inserted into any part of the planet you're dead now the insecticide is in our food and the plant is considered a registered pesticide now whether you insist the thing is it's a lot of things this whole thing about g m o it's a lot of things but it's not sex it's not sexual reproduction which is natural breeding which is what we've been doing when we've been seeing form for our crops and r and r and vironment for ever and about to get history claims that it's an extent the o's is just an extension of natural breeding and this is one of their myths it's completely false so the dmoz are swapping genes from one species into other species they've done some amazing if you can't make the stuff although they do they make it up it's like mad scientist let's see what we can do this and you can just makes it match all sorts of things basically you take your gene a gene produces a protein it's just the now the reason why we're eating g m o's is traced back to our food and drug administration which boldly claim that we don't see any difference and because they say we don't see any difference even saying we're not aware of any information showing that the foods are significantly different they said on the market with new words a p says so there is no approval of g m owes from the f d a they are not offering there's a voluntary consultation process at the end of the meeting with exercise have determined that there's no issue that needs to be evaluated by the f d a and this is you know they they just handed whatever junk science they want to give him and tobacco science which we have shown to be company these three months airto scientists refused to drink milk thereafter unless it was work at the f d a and he was testing he was requiring tested they don't test it we have to just look at companies do tests and he was describing the rigid research that monsanto and others were doing and how they would just eliminate sick so the f d a put out a an article in science magazine to defend their approval of our b g they've never done that before putting article in a science magazine and they said there's a daily dose of seven every two weeks and increased thirty four percent the hormone increasing thirty four percent that's six significant increase in my opinion for a hormone hormones are than normal under those conditions they destroyed ninety percent and that's what the f d a reported here's another one this is actually my favorite of the rig research there's all sorts of things we have them either we catch them absolutely random and they still get away with it because they're allowed that we are they can reach millions of people with lies so here's another one they put out a gene from soil organisms into corn to produce more lysine for pig feed and they apply for approval in australia and they said all the protein that's produced by this inserted gene it has a history of safe use in the food supply in the soil and we obviously a lot of soil i don't know about you but i just shout down figured if all that corn was months at those high lysine variety how much of that protein would need now how much soil would he have to consume in order to have the equivalent of  twenty two thousand pounds per second they're off by several trillion twenty two thousand pounds i mean i don't even want to end imagine with that but don't try to back it up  so they've got him you know crazy assumption wrong wrong detection methods anyway this is how we see the companies that we're deciding to determine if there are foods or say you know what monsanto had p c b's going in a factory test in alabama and they knew they were poisoning the town they put a fish into the river bed and they hired a consultant to do this within a minute the fish continuing to poison this town and they got convicted and maybe find seven hundred million dollars and i mean aspartame i mean people still eat aspartame one  a wanted to sue the company for fraud because evidently they threw out tumors from the rats before they did the autopsies and so the the lawyers who were the prosecutors there was a primary or secondary the primary one his job and joined the law firm of the aspartame company then the deputy prosecutor took over he first let the statute of limitations run out and then quit his job and got paid forty thousand dollars to work for the law firm of the opposing side and the f d a still wanted to ban it but the day reagan got in he said to the f d a commissioner you can no longer enact any laws or rules  was friends with regular and rumsfeld's friends became the commissioner of the f d a and he approved aspartame when he became the subject of eighty percent of all consumer complaints in a single year for a food additive and the f d a divided the complaints into ninety he was in charge of policy at the f d a he's the one that allows that sentence probably voted itself to be there is a big justification for saying no labeling new testing no nothing and it was a toxins new diseases and nutritional problems but the white house had instructed the f d a to promote about technology so they created a new position with separately from michael taylor and then tailor we came my dad a vice president and now he's the u s food safety  information for typically nort because it's going to leave voluntarily and they don't have to pass it if you know but this company wanted it to be looked at in detail and their rap feeding study and the rats refused to eat the tomato about whether i wanted to they my first book you know starting with the rats rejected but i will be coming out with a t shirt next month for that so it's not just rats it's actually from i want to support it's all over north america i wrote about the edible scenarios and the eyewitness reports in one page before each chapter of scenes of deception and there's a story about squirrels they refused to eat the g m corn it was nailed to a tree in iowa with the cold winter days and they were eating the not g m o fire and then someone else did the same experiment in illinois and found similar results in his neighbor wanted to try weeks now in the u k it's very pro g m government they want to prove they want to convince a skeptical public their g m ones were sick so they actually gave three million bucks who's time world's leading researcher in his field to figure out how to test for the safety of human and he was supposed to come up with a protocol to put into the e u law so that any product to be approved would have to go through his testing protocol so he took potatoes engineered to produce an insecticide and he took that g m potato along with a complete balanced diet and fed it to a group of friends and he fed another group of rats now jim potatoes exactly the same type of potatoes that a third group of rats known to potatoes plus the spike to their diet with the of the pediatrician one's a family practitioner and they were both convinced that the digestive tract of north america is certainly of their clients is becoming damaged they see this unprecedented rise even in very little care where humans are not digesting allergic reactions and they pointed to this particular study as one of the problems that may be causing this because it wasn't the particular sect deciding cause the problem it was somehow the process of genetic engineering the same process they created the saw in the corner the products on the market the created this potato which is not on the mark there's some other things that may be causing this problem in human beings and of the maid and i'll go over that we'll have some time to talk about that i want to describe five categories of things that could go wrong and before i do i just realized actually describe the fate of done by police time let's go back and take a look at him he's a friend of mine things didn't go so well for he discovered the problems with the rats was invited to speak on television got permission from his director described that he didn't think g m o should be fed to human beings could be like the guinea pigs because he knew absolutely the terrible research was being done completely he knew that if his potatoes had been tested by monsanto or bear on these other g m crop companies they were passed on to the market because they didn't look for potential programs to sell growth they had way the organs they look at the immune system he said reading their research was a turning point in his life because he couldn't believe how poor absolutely dangerous that research was researcher in this field the only one the one who was doing the safety studies on g m o's saying g m o's words in his director took over all of the media actually without even telling our part he just forwarded all the calls and all the facts as to his own office so he could tell how brilliant the research was and how much he was thinking of if he instilled a lot of money to a lot of repeat research now this director was being groomed by the u k prime minister to be in charge of the new food standards agency that was to be happening soon and he was shocked tuesday afternoon between three and five to receive two calls from the k prime minister's office we don't know exactly who was on the other line we don't know exactly what was said but the next day the director fired our park police i after thirty five years young lie after lie to protect the reputation of g m a after seven months as gag order was lifted by order of parliament he got the data back  picture is in the lancet as this one time journal and he when he was able to go public and amazing thing happened seven hundred articles were written within a month people all over europe started buzzing about g m and people were concerned about g m this was at ninety nine now this was completely unexpected but it was devastating to the fortunes of the gov't again destry because at the end of april about ten weeks from the gag order being lifted unilever publicly committed to stop using the medians its european brands and by the end of the week so with almost everyone else this was in sh contrast to the bout to get mysteries projections which were revealed in january one thousand nine hundred ninety conference in san francisco where they projected a ninety five percent takeover of all commercial seeds in the world by two thousand and four they were planning to replace virtually everything we do with genetically modified foods because of our pod post and the gag order being lifted that's w the real they're trying i want to go through five categories of things that can go wrong the first category we've already been told about it's the process now we know that massive collateral that two to four percent of the d n a is different mutations hundreds or thousands of mutations up or down the d n a up to five percent of the naturally functioning genes can change their levels of expression spewing out maybe allergens or toxins or carcinogens or anti nutrients or something healthy you don't know it's a genetic roulette and as i gave this book out to political leaders around the world it was about twenty five countries and i realized at that time i knew for sure i had his book two cabinet ministers others they didn't have time to read it they would so i needed to write something for the leaders but by this time we were also completely confident they were winning every debate against the scientists who were saying that humans were safe because we had all the data showing that they were either lying or based basing their arguments on tested assumptions so for them i had to write like a textbook or detailed information so i had to do was like how do i write for the politician and the students of the scientist or the stand so i decided to write a book for both of them where the pages are two page spreads the left side is a summary for the attention deficit politician on the right side or the you know reference tags for anyone so you could just flip through and just read the left side just regular size and there's a way to use this if you want to be an which is about the health dangers in terms of these five of the categories i discuss