this is not a normal time we are we are facing a planetary emergency the relationship between humankind and planet earth has been radically altered in a very short period of time and what what would make us believe that we can go through these changes and not have an impact our impact on the planet has been dramatically changed who is capable of doing damage that we're not always fully aware that we're doing the pin the hottest years ever measured in the record i've been on since ninety nine twenty of the twenty one hottest years have been since in the last twenty five years the hottest year of all was two thousand and five the hottest year of all the u s was two thousand and six the hottest winter ever measured worldwide was this or the summer and then january and february of this year last month this is going on right now and it's continuing to increase the document from the national oceanic and atmospheric haven't been this cold this time of year in twenty years forecasters say and before that for some places it's back another one hundred years it felt more like christmas holiday weather than easter especially in the east where washington especially white the boys of summer through snow ball instead of baseballs in cleveland again today after friday's opening day game was snow that was unfortunately the weather is unfortunately unseasonably cold to the point of maybe forty to fifty degrees below normal temperature wise across portions of the let's say west central in north central texas the eastern two thirds of the country well below normal many things we thought we knew about the climate system just a few years ago are now proving to be highly uncertain or quite mistaken for whatever reason right now it becomes quite newsworthy to go out and tell people that we are about to have apocalyptic climate changes and the second you make a pronouncement it's going to go around the world and find examples to support your view but what have always been there would be no time in earth history you would not have been able to go around the world and find damaging tornadoes whenever they are not linked to the buildup of greenhouse gases when people say we don't believe in global warming i say no i believe in global warming i don't believe that human c o scientists on the globe warming issues in the humans are causing a catastrophic change the climate system well i am one scientists and there are many that simply think that is not true you know it is a political  government people and so on anyone who ever came close to them and none of them are i have to agree many of them disagree that since no scientist disagrees you shouldn't disagree either but that whenever a clear and simple increases of greenhouse gases were driving us toward the climate catastrophe however a few years ago i decided to look more closely at the science and it astonished me in fact there is no evidence of humans being the there is however overwhelming evidence of natural causes such as changes in the output of the sun this is completely reversed my views on the kyoto protocol actually many other leading climate researchers also have serious concerns about the science underlying the protocol so let's hear what you are not being called the book land again the major premise of the inconvenient truth is the carbon dioxide is the major greenhouse gas that drives the jim richer of the earth they can go back six hundred and fifty thousand years here's what the temperature has been on our or now one thing that kind of jumps out at you is well let me put it this way if my classmates from the sixth grade that talked about africa and south america were here he would say did they ever fit together most ridiculous thing i've ever heard but they did of course and the relationship is actually very complicated but there is one relationship that is far more powerful than all the others and it is this when there is more carbon dioxide the temperature gets warmer because it traps more heat from the sun inside the ice core data comes from ice drilled to a depth of nearly twelve thousand feet or two point two miles at the vos talk station in antarctica like mr gore the united nations uses this information to prove that earth c o two and temperature are highly correlated and they are right however a high correlation proves nothing to give an extreme example there is one hundred percent correlation that any human the breeze air will die but that does not prove that breathing air kills people far from it we would all die if we didn't breathe air but even the correlation used by mr gore in the united nations is misleading notice they kept the two graphs separate by doing so the human eye perceives that c o two causes temperature to rise however when the temperature graph is superimposed over the c o two graph it becomes apparent that c o two tends to follow temperature not proceeded strongly suggesting that the c o two does not cause the temperature to change but the temperature causes c o two to change this point was made extremely well by london england's channel four in the documentary they produced called the great global warming swindle but here we're looking at the ice core record from boston and in the red we see picture going up from the ice core record close to the very heart of the problem we have here they said it's a c o two increases in the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas then the temperature will go up but the ice core record shows exactly the opposite so the fundamental assumption the most fundamental assumption of the whole theory of acquirement change due to humans is shown to be wrong him it's produced a small fraction in the single digits percentage wise of the c o two that is produced in the atmosphere of the two hundred ten billion metric tons of carbon emitted the atmosphere each year humans contribute only six point three billion tonnes are about three percent other sources like vegetation soils in the ocean dorf the amount produced by man the importance of carbon dioxide is diminished even further by the never mentioned fact that the overwhelming majority of all greenhouse gases is water vapor in clouds water vapor comprises approximately ninety seven percent of all greenhouse gases carbon dioxide comprises less than two percent and the balance is made up of methane coral floral carbons and niters oxide many proponents of man caused global warming claim that water vapor is highly variable across the earth and from season to season and therefore is an important additionally they claim that c o two has far greater potential as a greenhouse gas than a small amount would otherwise indicate well there is some truth in these claims water vapor remains the dominant greenhouse gas the effectiveness of potential greenhouse gases is highly variable due to a host of reasons at any one time water vapor accounts for thirty six to seventy percent of the total greenhouse gas affects if clouds are included it jumps to sixty six eighty six percent carbon dioxide comes in a distant third by counting for only nine to twenty seven percent and remember man's activities accounts for less than three percent of the total carbon dioxide so at a maximum man is responsible for less than one percent of all the potential greenhouse gases in the atmosphere we see the greenhouse power of water vapor every day temperatures in the desert can easily reach one hundred ten degrees fahrenheit during the day in the summer during the night desert temperatures can easily drop down to sixty five degrees a drop of forty five degrees the change is so large because of the very low water vapor in the desert converse only because the humid deep south has high levels of water vapor they time temperatures rarely go over one hundred degrees fahrenheit and drop to only eighty degrees at night a difference of only twenty degrees that represents a twenty five degree difference between the deserts and the human areas and day night temperatures all due to the amount of water vapor we also see the greenhouse effect of clouds on a regular basis the temperature ma to fifty degrees at night when it is clear but remains at sixty five degrees at night when it's cloudy a difference of fifteen degrees or more between clear and cloudy weather the greenhouse power of water vapor and clouds dwarfs that of carbon dioxide and remember only a tiny amount of the carbon dioxide greenhouse effect is caused by man fact if you want to categorize greenhouse gases to pair for i phrase a colleague of mine he says that greenhouse gas number one two three and four as water vapor with carbon dioxide would be a distant five c o two has an influence but it's certainly not significant enough for it to have for us to worry about more likely the warming is part of a natural past climate researchers have found that over much of the world between about fourteen hundred and in some places as latest one thousand nine hundred there was a period of colder than average temperature over the world called the little ice age and before that there was a period of unusual warmth the medieval optimal or warm period so warming and cooling are part of the norm the twentieth century is not all a balance compared to the past although man's research was never out of did the united nations and analysis of the results to see what happened when we wreak compile we compiled the data and got quite different answers and stead of having a extraordinarily high twentieth century we had a fifteenth century value that was just as high as the twentieth century so the hockey stick disappeared it's a computer programming error that deal says hockey sticks this piece of the  removed before science can develop a proper understanding of the climate history of the last millennium here is the study that appeared in the world's top science journal issues that weren't described in the paper mcintyre mckendrick noted that the graph using the corrected data could still be wrong because the methodology used in the m p h ninety eight was fundamentally incorrect they wrote in geophysical research letters that quote effect of a transformation is so strong that a hockey stick shape p c one curve is almost always generated from a tremulous red noise with the persistent properties of the north american tree ring network unquote in other words when mcintyre and mckitrick analyzed random da h ninety eight methodology out popped a hockey stick every time the mcintyre mckendrick report generated so much controversy that the us congress authorized the national academy of sciences to study and report on the issue the national academy sensing the support of the mcintyre mckendrick report by warning that the methodology used in m p h ninety eight should not be used for this type of research because it quote tends to bias the shape of the reconstructions unquote although the report also criticize other aspects of the m b a age ninety eight it did so on a very apologetic manner leading the media to proclaim that the national academy actually supported him b h ninety eight separate from the national academy the energy and commerce committee of the u s house representatives commissioned three prominent statisticians chaired by an eminent statistics professor edward wegman chairman of the us national academy of sciences committee on theoretical applied statistics to review both the mph ninety eight and the  eight to be somewhat obscure and incomplete and the criticisms of mcintyre mckendry to be valid and compelling unquote in spite of this al gore prominently displays the hockey stick an inconvenient truth as does the two thousand and four arctic climate impact assessment making both highly suspect dr vincent gray a chemist and i p c c expert reviewer tears his concerns about why the discredited hockey stick continues to be used they might on what they were go medical road in one thousand nine hundred six recent research shows that eight thousand years ago temperatures are six to eight degrees higher in the arctic than today and that dramatic changes occurred in only a few decades nevertheless polar bears and other arctic wildlife obviously had that they didn't survive and so are also not threatened today about five thousand years ago the world was much warmer than it is today and warmer even then they're forecasting for the most extreme global warming forecasts a common misconception amongst the general public is that temperatures are rapidly increasing this is only with some of the surface data and a selected surface data in fact if much of the surface data that's collected is from around urban areas or areas which have had significant land use change and this data is contaminated on the other hand satellites provide comprehensive coverage of the earth twenty four seven for the last twenty years and so what they have demonstrated is that there has been an almost imperceptible rise in temperature over this time but is there really much difference between temperatures in cities and that of the rest of the world that did studies in what it paid twenty five years ago we were measuring the heat on of the city of winnipeg and we found as much as ten degrees celsius difference between portage and main which is supposedly the coldest part of what day and the airport eight  most of these of the world have hotter temperatures in the surrounding countryside that has nothing to do with carbon dioxide and everything to do with land use modern cities have concrete buildings with asphalt roofs that generate heat which creates artificial heat it elevates the temperature that doesn't really reflect its true climate we have below as they go up through the atmosphere twice each day for locations around the world and they are near perfect agreement with the satellite right what about the relatively warm year one nine eight was that global warming or a naturally occurring of it such as el nino in one thousand nine hundred seven ninety eight we had a major oil nino develop at low latitude and it was a tremendous amount of water vapor pumped up in the atmosphere and we had a one degree celsius spike around the world that was noted that time the disappeared within a few months ironically in spite of al gore's proclamations to the contrary there has been no statistical increase in the earth's temperature since one nine hundred ninety eight converse only even though the earth's temperature has leveled off c o two levels have continued to increase exactly the opposite of what should happen to c o two is the driving force that's not all we have repeatedly heard in one thousand nine hundred eight was the warmest year ever recorded hundred ninety s in two thousand is where the world was decades in recorded history in august of two thousand and seven the nasa data to support this claim was found to contain an error by stephen mcintyre the same scientists that discredited the hockey stick cur error was small and immediately corrected by nasa but the corrected temperatures diametrically change the rankings of the hottest years in the past one hundred twenty years the corrected data show that nine hundred thirty four not one nine hundred ninety eight was the hottest year while nine ninety eight was the second hottest year nine hundred twenty one became the third hottest year followed by two thousand and six and one nine hundred thirty three out of the five hottest years three occurred during the one nine hundred twenty s and thirty's and only two were found in the past ten years looking in other words the warmest temperatures over the past one hundred twenty years were no warmer than those between one thousand nine hundred nine hundred fifty three ironically the temperature between these two warm periods cooled leading the media to proclaim that we are entering a new ice age not even twenty five years ago that the great threat was global cooling go back to the seventy's and seventy six and people like ponting publishing books called the cooling and the scientific consensus then was that we a drastic decline in food production with serious political implications for just about every nation on earth second headline in the new york times reach climate change is in danger world out there here's another quote from time magazine as they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory media logical fluctuations are actually part of a global climate upheaval all this sounds very ominous that is until you realize that the three quotes i just read were from articles in one nine hundred seventy five editions of newsweek magazine in the new york times and at time magazine in one nine hundred seventy four they were referring to global warming they were warning of a coming i think so the same people who were hysterical back then are using the same the same words to describe what's happening today let me repeat all three of those quotes were published in the one nine hundred seventy s warning of a the mainstream media has subverted its role as an objective source of information and climate change into a role of an advocate we've seen examples of this overwhelmingly one sided reporting sixty minutes reporter scott thousand and six from the u k s labor leaning institute for public policy research also slammed the media presentation of climate science as you know we're going to quote here again this is what they said these are people who are believers in the other side of this about man to quote the unreality of hollywood films now these are the believers we're talking about senator inhofe is correct the media has not served the american people well on the global warming issue as we have already seen there are serious discrepancies in the man caused global warming theory yet it's not all the media's fault they are repeatedly told by the united nations intergovernmental panel for climate change the i p c c that man is causing global warming the i p c c announced its summary for policymakers during  press conference in paris in february two thousand and seven announcing that the science had advanced so much that they can now say that man caused global warming is a ninety percent certainty and says people have to understand that the entire global climate change hysteria is driven by computer models it is not driven by reality reality is not warming up like both models said what there is not a computer in the world with the capacity to handle the data but more important to handle all of the calculations of interaction and complexities of the climate we frequently hear that the incidence and severity of extreme weather such th hurricanes blizzards droughts and floods are increasing and that global warming is the cause the argument is that we're going to have an increase of drought and it's another part of the scare tactics of well more severe weather more droughts  on when you look at the long term record what you see is that droughts are cyclical they do alternate and but you also see there are far more worst droughts in the past we've had in the in the modern record history shows that storm frequency and intensity is greatest in colder periods the extreme weather of the little ice age provides a good example the storms were much more dramatic the storms were wiped out villages and hundreds of thousands of people at a time in storms not seen since the famous river in england would freeze over every year and there'd be ice parties crop failures meant starvation and plagues were common all in all it was a very difficult time to live man caused global warming proponents also claim that because the north pole is melting polar bears are threatened with extinction however numerous studies have shown that all but one of the many polar bear populations are stable or increasing polar bears have managed to survive just fine through many other periods in the past ten thousand years in which it was much warmer than even the most pessimistic global warming predictions today what about the antarctic and greenland water melting cause massive shoreline flooding it's considered relatively more stable however than another big body of ice that's roughly the same size greenland would also raise sea level almost twenty feet if it will if greenland broke up and melt or if half of greenland and half of west antarctica broke up and melted this is what would happen to the sea level in f this is what would happen to san francisco bay a lot of people live in these areas even the highly political united nations ip p c states in their two thousand and seven summary for  policymakers at the most that will happen by the twenty first century is fifty nine centimeters or twenty three inches the only possible reason al gore would use such a blatant distortion of truth would be to create a sense of raw fear in the videos viewers tragically the inconvenient truth has been repeatedly shown to thousands of naive elementary and high school students who have little to no basis to judge the merits of what they're watching not only is al gore's assessment extremely exaggerated but there is compelling evidence that many parts of antarctica are getting colder and the center of greenland ice cap is actually growing not melting the evidence for greenland is quite dramatic on july fifteenth one thousand nine hundred two two b seventeen  p thirty eight lightnings flying from the united states to england were forced to make an emergency landing on greenland southern icecap the crew was rescued but the planes were left on the ice in one thousand nine hundred eighty pad apps and richard taylor led a team to find these missing planes they expected to find them within forty feet of the surface they did not after several years of failure the planes were finally filed in one thousand nine hundred two one mile from the landing site and two hundred sixty eight feet below the ice surface the team used hot water to  tunnel down to one of the planes to extract it dubbed the glacier girl the plane was restored and is now flying again the planes did not see to a depth of two hundred sixty eight feet north of the glacier pushed him down to that depth if that were the case the planes would have been ripped apart rather two hundred sixty eight feet of ice accumulated on them from one thousand nine hundred one to one nine hundred ninety two although the results are complex other research shows that much of greenland's interior ice cap is growing in only its edges or melting  balance there is only a slight decline for the entire continent al gore ignores all this and concentrates instead on the melting that is occurring on the edges of greenland ten years later this is what happened and here is the melting from two thousand  should we be alarmed about this melting eight hundred years ago earth was considerably warmer than it is today the vikings settled in southern greenland and prospered in an agrarian culture that period is known as the medieval optimal or medieval warm period and the vikings grew crops where much of the melting is occurring today by fourteen hundreds when the temperature was about what it is today the climate had become so called of the vikings had to abandon many of their settlements if the same vikings were here today they g it certainly wasn't human produce c o two the answer may be in the sun it has been known for centuries if there is a relationship between the number of sunspots and the earth's temperature the more sunspots the warmer the earth's temperature it is recently been determined that the more sunspots there are the more energy the sunny minutes however the encrease energy is not sufficient to account for the warming of the earth that discovery encouraged the theory that the sun could not c warming and that carbon dioxide must be the driving force while direct changes in solar energy output may not be sufficient to cause the warming there seems to be other factors at work it has been known for some time that there is a high correlation between the length of the solar cycle and the earth's temperature and emerging theory seems to fit all the data and offers a far better explanation for the current warming than greenhouse gases it has been no says the twentieth century that there appears to be a correlation between cosmic radiation and low elevation cloudiness the more cosmic radiation the more cloud formation several dany scientists led by hendricks have the mark confirmed that relation in the early one nine hundred ninety s and found the correlation to be highly significant they then developed a working hypothesis when the sun go supernova it emits a burst of cosmic radiation as that radiation reaches the earth thousands of years later it interacts with atmospheric atoms and freeze electrons which then act to bring water vapor molecules together which when it condenses out into water droplets in the lower atmosphere which creates clouds low elevation clouds are highly reflective and reflect the sun's energy back out in the space the more clouds the more sun is reflected and the less solar energy actually gets to the earth to warm it and the earth temperature drops as long as the cosmic rays are bombarding the earth in higher amounts there will be greater cloud formation greater solar reflectance and cooler global temperatures however as the sun becomes more active with solar flares and other activity plasma made up of charged particles of mainly electrons and protons called solar winds stream out from the sun while this has many effects on the earth it keeps more of the cosmic radiation from reaching the earth and other planets thereby reducing cloud formation with fewer low altitude clouds more of the sun's energy reaches the earth's surface where causes heating and a warming earth the effect is huge in just five years it can cause a two percent decrease in clouds which in turn equates to an increase in surface warming equivalent to about eighty five percent of what is claimed for all carbon dioxide warming since the industrial revolution in addition mars and other planets in the solar system also appear to be experiencing global warming just like earth although the theory is in hot debate within the scientific community this evidence supports the solar cause global warming theory and further weakens the carbon dioxide greenhouse gas theory elevated levels of carbon dioxide may not be as harmful as al gore and other man caused global warming proponents would have us believe in fact there is strong evidence that elevated carbon dioxide may be very beneficial something that we are never told and c o two is been part of the planetary atmosphere since the first day this earth evolved and the plants and virtually everything we see evolved in a period of time when the c o two level is very much higher than it is today c o two is something that plants a lot of they take of c o two they use it they give out oxygen we take the oxygen and give out c o two so it's hardly a pollutant at all it's quite a naturally occurring gas that appears in our atmosphere and is very important to sustaining life on this earth in terms of the broad geological perspective the carbon dioxide concentration of the atmosphere right now is low almost all the plants that we live with and depend upon for food evolved in an atmosphere when the c o two was higher in the atmosphere much higher than it is today and higher than we could possibly get it even if we rob well as matter of fact i would times when life flourished on earth the time when c o two levels were something like ten times current level was when the dinosaurs were running around if carbon dioxide levels were two more times what they are today were you don't go and look at how carbon is distributed today provides an easy answer the atmosphere today holds less than eight hundred billion metric tons of carbon so oil in vegetation over two thousand fossil fuels four thousand oceans nearly forty thousand however the greatest city for carbon is inside of metairie rocks like limestone which has an estimated eighty trillion metric tons of carbon that has been taken out of the atmosphere that is one hundred times the amount that is currently in the atmosphere so scientists believe that nine thousand or so years ago agriculture spread out all over the world we saw people domesticate plants in southeast asia asia and south america and europe and north america all about the same time and it also corresponded when the carbon dioxide levels had increased from about two hundred parts per my and about two hundred fifty parts per million they gave agricultural plants a competitive advantage over wheat it may be that carbon dioxide is a reason we do masticate plants when we've looked at the literature on experiments that have been done with increasing levels of carbon dioxide what we basically find is that most plants respond the same way more carbon dioxide gives us more biomass so if we look at a forest a range land a marsh a well and or negra cultural field what's really happening with more c o two is that you have more plant material increase yield is experienced in all food crops when the carbon dioxide is increased research shows that a doubling of carbon dioxide increases food production dramatically for instance a doubling of carbon dioxide will increase cereal crops by twenty thousand nearly fifty percent legumes like peas and beans by forty four percent roots and tubers by forty percent and vegetables by thirty three percent as if that's not enough carbon dioxide also helps these crops overcome harsh growing conditions such as drought and pollution the amount of water that is used by plants to produce the same amount of growth actually decreases with increased c o two so a higher water use efficiency means we're using c o two more efficiently in terms of the water requirements for the crowd this will change some of the ecosystems it may allow some plants to grow in areas that now would be considered marginal for the growth of those plans so we have more biomass production plants in a little bit different area and we may actually be able to farm some of the areas that would now be considered rather than dangerous pollutant carbon dioxide could be called a miracle gas that actually like a free fertilizer to help alleviate famine in regions of the world that have frequent drowse and famines all without causing harm to the environment or people research has shown that increases of c o two concentration of two three four five times would not have a detrimental effect upon the earth's bi up to about fifteen hundred parts per million that's has no negative effect on human health to get negative effects on human health you have to go much higher that's higher than five and ten thousand parts per million at least slim and none however the evidence that it's doing a good thing by lengthening the growing season and making plants grow better it's somewhere between a large and overwhelming the sinuses told you the other side of the global warming issue when you put it in a public forum where both sides of the story are told many people who once believed in man caused global warming suddenly become skeptics there's a reason for this this happened only last week there is a debate that balance it's and let me make sure we understand when i talk about skeptics i'm talking about scientists who believe that the science is not settled when i talk about alarmist i'm saying they're the ones who think that it is settled ok when the debate is balance skeptics when the alarmists in new york last week and major debate took place to maximum to examine whether this is the go whether global warming is a crisis prior to the debate the hand wringers the alarm guys in the audience outnumbered those who didn't think it was a crisis by two to one after the debate it completely reversed the results of our debate after our debaters did their best to sway you you went from thirty percent for the motion that global warming is not a crisis from thirty percent to forty six percent motion went from fifty seven percent to forty two percent so in terms of opinion change those in favor of the motion have carried the day congratulate you but what they can't have is a situation where people just can't get a paper out of the literature without having done any kind of analysis of it or verification of it and say on this basis we're going to start spending billions of dollars that's just a recipe for disaster so why do so many scientists adamantly defend the theory of man caused global warming when the evidence is so weak you early one nine hundred ninety s i led a multimillion dollar research effort on the effects of global warming on the nation's ecosystems and what your fine is about that time is that the government would begin to fund tremendously global warming research is about two billion dollars a year then it's up to four billion dollars a year now there is a whole qadri of scientists out there that are on what's called soft money if they do not show a global warming connection they will not get their next grant it has been shown time and time again when a scientist basically said i cannot speak this any longer it's just not happening they no longer get grants from the federal government and they're out of a job those scientists that are skeptical about man caused global warming are repeatedly accused of being funded by big oil industry yet the opposite is true if industry funding corrupt someone's message however however i suggest the alarmists have an awful lot of explaining to do they receive an awful lot more an industry an industry late related funding every year but let's just make the record the public record is quite clear we do not receive lots of money from big oil and for some reason that seems to be the claim that the alarmists want to shift the debate onto even though they know the truth there too many of these companies actually play hardball politics to get congress to spend more money on global warming research and to pass economically damaging legislation but why the cost of global warming is huge we had a hearing mr vice president before this committee where we had many of the companies who in were embracing the idea that manmade gases are causing climate change only to find out that without exception each one of the five companies that was here testifying had to stand they stood to gain not only ends but a couple  cases billions of dollars if we should put reductions on cap and trade policy or reductions on c o two the question then becomes why why does al gore use for can only be described as madison avenue fear mongering to try to convince you that the world is going to end unless we ratify the kyoto protocol and impose international solutions to stop man caused global warming what possible reason could there be congressman don young of alaska writes of insight writer for time magazine where his writings reveal his eagerness to get rid of patriotism american sovereignty and independence in the july twentieth one thousand nine hundred two time top it wrote an article entitled the birth of the global nation enthusiastically predicted that in the next century nationhood as we know it will be obsolete all states will recognize a single global authority in fact will tell the national sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all of brag about how our national sovereignty and independence have already been diminished by the international monetary fund and the general agreement on tariffs and trade forget agreements he boasted that the internal affairs of a nation are no longer off limits to world governments for his article talbott received an award from the world federalist association a group committed to world governments and a congratulatory letter from bill clinton later president clinton appointed if you know what is actually happening that the the developing nations china and russia and so forth are not bound by that treaty they can continue expand their industry continue to pollute as all who are forever and in fact china is basically go overtake the emissions of carbon dioxide by the united states within two years and so no effect on those particular nations they can continue just to increase only developed nations are required to decrease we have the issue of having to buy carbon credits from those third world nations so it's a massive income redistribution plan to provide money for these third world nations and it will not help global warming whatsoever even the united nations admits this the roots of global governance goes well back over one hundred years in one thousand nine hundred sixty six one of the foremost an unimpeachable american historians of the twentieth century carol quickly published a book entitled tragedy and hope a history of the world in our time he spent twenty years researching this agenda and found that it was a quiet effort to create world government with a small condrey of people controlling that government because he agreed with the goals of the cavils efforts quigley was given access to all the records for a period of two years on page three hundred twenty four of his thirteen hundred page magnus opus are these troubling words the powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole this system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at infrequent private meetings and conferences these private groups meetings and conferences still exist today under a cloud of innuendo and conspiracy they include what is known as the round table which is the core of the council on foreign relations in the united states the club of rome the trilateral commission the builder bergs and many others purpose then i mean presumably it's a kind of it's a good get together of powerful people they don't often get a chance to meet away from the glare of the press one can understand why they might want to have a private yeah and that said you got something to do with it they see themselves as wise of the politicians the globalists involved in creating world control have historically called their efforts the new world order since the early part of the twentieth century president george h bush used to publicly during the first gulf war out of these troubled time a new world order hannum or now we can see a new world coming into view a world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order the name new world order race on many red flags that was dropped almost as soon as president bush uttered them during the first gulf war the commission on global governance was immediately formed with the full blessing of the united nations its report was released in one thousand nine hundred four and published its our global neighborhood in  the report provides a flexible set of justifications and implementation goals needed to implement global governance the report acknowledges that the environment is key to forming global governance in states that considerable strides have been made in creating  international environmental governance to achieve global sustainable development through the management of cross border environmental disputes and protection of the global commons man caused global warming fits perfectly with an international environmental governance the report recommends quote a carbon tax would no doubt be a valuable step forward towards a radically different system one that taxes resource use rather than employment through payroll taxes and savings this would recognize the need to discourage excessive consumption and would stimulate employment as part of a strategy of sustainable development unquote that is exactly what al gore and other alarmists are saying today somehow they claim more taxes are going to help our economy and yes i know that  is considered just wildly unrealistic now but you know our pattern of financing our social programs and health and welfare programs on the backs of employees employment has outlived  in this in this context i really believe that that would help our economy help our competitiveness and i think would put incentives in place to do the right thing regardless of al gore's assurances making everything more expensive because of a carbon larger burden relative to their income than the wealthier households would unquote engage in such a plan would be disastrous to the american people this is exactly what historian carol quickly meant when he stated that quote in this group of globalist we're persons whose lives have been a disaster to our way of life unquote how does this work when he was vice president al gore called it reinventing government through the creation of public private partnerships you have heard this phrase many times on the news but you know what it really means there are literally thousands of these public private partnerships in the united states and around the world the problem with public private partnerships is that they shift decision making from the electorate and elected officials to an unaccountable partnership of non governmental organizations government bureaucracies and multinational corporations at the international national and local levels since none of these entities are elected and government bureaucracies are only marginally accountable to the electorate the partnerships are free to impose their will on people not unlike the feudal system just as historian carol quickly said in his book tragedy and hope all of this is driven by the deliberately fabricated need for what is called sustainable development which include things like smart growth and environmental protection the latter includes the kyoto protocol to extensively reduce global warming but in fact allows control of our economy by international bureaucracies that will impose carbon taxes and cap and trade schemes exactly as a commission on global governance and al gore propose the partnerships form a neo fascist relationship between government and corporations which creates monopolies effectively eliminating most competition from small businesses that do not have the ability to meet that your conan regulations once this process is fully in place there is no longer free market enterprise but total economic control again this is exactly what carroll quigley said would happen in tragedy and hope it is what is meant by global governance and the new world order lou n provides an excellent snapshot of how this is being done today and as terrible consequences on the middle class tonight a proposal for an expanded so called free trade zone from alaska to the tip of south america it's a plan for the business celine's the political elites that will cost more american jobs cost american sovereignty but it would fulfill the president's father's vision will talk to reports it's not a new idea president bush talked about it back in one nine hundred ninety one it is that big idea a new world order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause i now former united states trade master robert is talking about it again with renewed vigor this time a new world order with business at the helm of trade and economic policy advocated what he calls the association of american free trade agreements that separate non government entity which get done when he was a u s trade representative and this is a business agenda it's an agenda that goes hand in hand with the united states mexico and canada working quietly and behind the scenes to promote a common market with common deregulation for the benefit of multinational corporations it's an agenda that so far has resulted in an increase in u s corporate profits at forty five percent while wages of american workers have risen only three percent in the last five years and that is one of the reasons why it costs a little more in fact al gore uses seventeen times more electricity than the average american the average american uses eleven thousand two hundred fifty six kilowatts annually while the gores use an almost unbelievable one hundred ninety one thousand kilowatts yet al gore casually justifies this because you is green energy that only the rich can afford that kind of hypocrisy is not confined to the gore actor john travolta also claims that we should all sacrifice in order that we reduce carbon dioxide emissions yet he owns five airplanes that he can use to jet or on the world park within walking distance of his home in florida listen to what the author of state of fear and major leaders in climate who clearly have no intention of changing their lifestyle reducing their consumption or getting off private jets themselves if they're not willing to do it why should anybody  o global institution it seems to me you really approach your sell out in a betrayal of the founding fathers idea from the camaro what you have seen in this video is only a small part of the evidence that the current warming of the earth is natural we hope this evidence has helped you understand both sides of this critical issue we hope you ask yourself why the global warming alarmists try to convince you that the ice core data shows that carbon dioxide levels have controlled the earth's temperature in the past when most of the time temperature proceeded the carbon dioxide levels are why the troposphere is not warming according to what the carbon dioxide warming theory states that we must then ask yourself why there is not a good correlation between carbon dioxide levels in the temperature when there is very good correlation between solar a cosmic radiation levels and temperature finally ask yourself why you were never told that much higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide could provide a huge benefit to people in the earth's environment on the other hand there is strong evidence lead is using global warming as one of the many tools to impose global governance in the united states and around the world if successful this agenda promises to bring wealth and power to a global elite and transnational corporations at a terrible expense to the average person just like you we ask that you think hard on the choices that this nation will be making in the near future and then contact your senator and congressman to let them know what you believe is the right thing to do