at eight forty six on the morning of september eleventh two thousand and one the world would forever be changed and america would forever be altered a wave of patriotism swept across our country and the drumbeat of war was heard from our nation's heartland to countries a half a world away with a war on terror declared a nation would find itself in an uphill battle that would eventually lead to the destruction of civil liberties and the establishment of a military driven to conflicts based upon political lies and fraudulent official reports we now begin our investigation into the events of september eleventh what were you told happened that day there are some very anguished ridden people in the world and they decided to attack two planes were hijacked by terrorists and they were cracked at the world trade center two pla was has advertised that these our staff had been hijacked that it was a big terrorist operation that we were attacked by a guy in muslim extremists and i'd kind of just believe the initial story was in a state of shock as reports came out through the news and some alternative news sources that i've been i have been a subscriber into there were some some things that the reported by credible people these accident of the hot images are suggestive of the possibility of a planes which i'm not convinced that that's the case however when i first saw the appendage on flight one seventy five this extra piece of equipment i was looking at the evan fairbanks footage which is kind of bluish and it's from the underneath it's off centered on the fuselage it's between the engines  has its own reflection and when it when i saw this i thought somebody had to photoshop this and you know i wanted to get other sources do to make sure that it wasn't just a product of photoshop it was in all the c footage when you when you took their videos and did freeze frames it was definitely a three dimensional piece of equipment it definitely has nothing to do with photoshop and it shouldn't be there any but i can see the other looking for more video evidence you know right to ground zero simon and i went down to new york city one day and buying all the pictures from street vendors we could find we found a picture which i believe is rob howard's photograph but it was a thirty five millimeter prints and i was tickled because you could clearly see that you know the appendage on the bottom this is not normal for an aircraft this is not normal for what we should be seeing on flight one seventy five all the recorded sources all the different photographic evidence that was produced by c n n and a b c they all show this pot and it's there you can see it with your own eyes and in my professional opinion that that there was commercial airliner now i'll tell you where i have seen attachments that that look like that on military aircraft so the question we have to answer now is it was that the commercial airliner that hit the world trade center or possibly was it an aircraft a little gray similar but was a military type airplane after compiling a lot of the the photographs and a lot of video regarding flight one seventy five and there are some c n n footage that shows the whole side of the plane lighting up and just as the aircraft is penetrating the world trade center there is this bright anomalous event it's like an orange flash you know off to the right of the fuselage b bottom of that aircraft was exposed so that there was a large fl just prior to impact with the building it was a large player so large that it lit up the side of the fuselage of that aircraft it wasn't just a small spark there's been some discussion not just exactly what produced  and and the other item the possible explanation would have been and cindy are very and i'm a guy i do believe that this is what the source of the flash was  that was associated with the pod that was attached well the pod could have been a number of things it could have been even a missile attached it could have been some kind of explosive attached but whatever it was it didn't belong there on a commercial flight this is a rocket pod we primarily use the shoot at two point seven five inch unguided rockets on the a ten the primary role that we use these rockets for is forward air control we shoot white phosphorus rockets that contain a phosphorus spotting charge a very brilliant white cloud of smoke comes up when the rocket hits american flight eleven which was the flight that hit the north tower the first tower that was hit and as far as we know it was recorded by just one source and that was the not a brothers who were producing a documentary video about new york firefighters and they happened to be in a position to catch american flight eleven as that overflew new york city and flew into the north tower of the the world trade center again a cars under the plane suggesting they might be some sort of military plane and flashes suggesting that they might be igniting large fireballs for a spectacular television effect personally i'm not convinced that that's true but i'm also far from you know i'm not convinced that we need to dismiss that i bought this i've looked at these these images and some of the party images i think are they don't look to me like just optical illusions like the people who develop this claim did the pod have anything to do with the flash i can't answer it but i can say this the pod if you will not find a for an external piece of equipment that lord you will not find on the belly or attached anywhere on the external port of a port one twenty one scheduled airliner in the united states it just will happen all that does is tell me that airplane was not the airplane that the government said it was i have looked at the films of the plane hitting the south tower and i have seen the slow down version and it is obvious to me that on more than two or three of these films there is a flash of some sort that takes place just is these planes are bad to smack into the buildings i cannot tell you what that is but i can tell you what it's not it's not a box cutter indeed the flash couldn't have been the result of a box cutter so if the flash was the result of an incendiary device how does that fit into a terrorist hijacking scenario at all and if as colonel nelson has proposed there was extra equipment attached of the plane that hit the south tower how could that have been united airlines flight one seventy five or any other commercial airliner for that matter keep in mind that these planes disappeared for nearly a half an hour surely enough time to and take a similar type plane paint the tail numbers to resemble that of the commercial airliner flight by remote control out over the caribbean and by remote control blow it up after sending a tape recorded message saying help we're being attacked by cuban meg's this was in one thousand nine hundred sixty two and i think we had a very sophisticated more modern version of that plan happened on september the eleventh two thousand and my testimony was very upsetting for the commission for the simple reason that number one i talk about explosions in the building initial explosions before the plane hit the building i spoke about seeing one of the i investigation itself william rodriguez was a maintenance worker for the world trade center for twenty years and he's traveled the world telling a story about what happened to him on that horrible day his testimony is one of the most heart wrenching and emotional that you will ever hear it is his testimony that was deleted from the nine eleven commission report here's one of the reasons why a very strong and explosions saw hard  orders and at that moment i thought it was the mechanical room where they have all the palms on their generators for the building that maybe a generator just blew up in the basement not twenty years in the building you know something that comes from the bottom something his testimony of an explosion below him just seconds before the plane hit in the upper floors would obviously destroy the official story of a simple hijacking but the mainstream media has no interest in telling his story honestly he was interviewed on september eleventh of two thousand and six in new york city and listen carefully as to how w a b c t v edited his story to make it sound as though he was describing the sound of the plane and not a basement it was the first hijacked plane that hit the tower is it possible the w a b c and other network affiliates were working from a script on the morning of september eleventh two thousand and one let's take a look at some of the other video clips from other media outlets they could very well have set charges within the world trade center and of course it went down just like many of the buildings that we've seen on c n n or fox t v the busch stadium in st louis or are one of the famous of debris are falling on the street all when i began to look at the destruction of the world trade center and especially the twin towers it was astonishing to me how obvious the evidence was that the government account couldn't possibly be correct of course the government maintains that the buildings came down as a result of the impact of jet aircraft resulting jet fuel fires which weakened or melted the steel and lead to a pancake collapse that's indefensible on every count the buildings were designed to withstand the  largest commercial airliners which are a boeing seven zero seven is very similar in their size and mass and in fuel capacity to the seven sixty seven's that actually hit the building most of the fuel from these planes burned up in spectacular fireballs the fires that resulted were relatively modest the melting point of steel turns out to be two thousand eight hundred degrees fahrenheit the highest temperature you can acquire with a jet fuel based fire which is principally kerosene incidentally is a thousand degrees lower under ideal circumstances the billowing black clouds indicated these were oxygen starved or deprived fires that were burning much lower temperatures in fact the estimates on all sides are those fires were only running about five hundred degrees fahrenheit much too low obviously for the steel to have melted or even to have weakened since underwriter's laboratory and certify the steel up to two thousand agrees for three to four hours the fire in the south tower burned only around an hour in the north an hour and a half or so the fires were too low and too brief in duration to have caused the steel to even weaken if the steel had weakened there would have been a symmetrical sagging it would have been gradual and you wouldn't have had enough dynamic energy to cause a collapse in any case the whole theory of a pancake collapse is a physical impossibility of molten metal in the basements of all three buildings right and yet all scientists now and reasonably and i agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel so what is this molten metal it's a direct explain thanks these core columns were discovered after the collapse the angled cut occurs in exactly the manner that shaped charges slice through steel beams to control the way they through a series of bins cut at the same angle will tend to make the building shift over and walk building seven i'm not familiar with what it looks like or where this that's where the command center was  i don't know that much about structural issues on my building other than that there were an intense fire occurred there as a result of debris and such coming from the towers and that that's why that building came down decision to pull and then we watched the building one of the keys to what happened on nine eleven is what caused building seven of the world trade center to collapse many of you are going to go building seven was that that was a forty seven story steel and glass office building that just totally collapsed down into its own foundation about five twenty on the afternoon of nine eleven it was not hit by or planes didn't have any devastating fires in it it just collapsed down after the building owner larry silverstein said well until the fire department to pull it and they pulled it and we stood there watched the building come down and they made that decision to pull and that we watched the building collapse well industry slang pulling it means controlled demolition of building seven was brought down by controlled demolition then why is it so preposterous to assume then what happened at the trade center towers were brought down by controlled demolition what we know for sure is that these buildings were pre wired for demolition and that the plane hits were simply created as a distraction in the way a magician distracts you by showing you one thing while you know pulling something out of a hat while you're not looking in the same way they conditioned us to think that the demolitions were actually collapses caused by plane hits and fires were made that we now know that they were not building seven which is obviously a controlled demolition the collapse of this forty seven story building in seven seconds  for no reason at all a couple of small fires or no you have a couple of little knowsley here next on the side of the towers that's a ridiculous story that anybody can see through and then when you hear that the over insured landlord of six weeks mr larry silverstein basically confessed to holding at or taking it down in a controlled demolition i'm national television no less i mean you really see that the whole thing is obviously an inside job so i think building seven is the sort of the first thing that we need to wait you know in the face of everybody who has figured this out ye steve september eleventh there was worldwide live television coverage and the coverage continued throughout the day the interesting thing is that at ten p m london time which is five p m eastern standard time they reported that the solomon brothers building building seven had collapsed the only problem is building seven didn't collapse until five twenty p m new york time now more on the latest building collapse in new york you might have heard a few moments ago i was talking about the salomon brothers building collapsing and indeed it has a paradise only a few hundred yards away from where the world trade center towers were and it seems that this was not a result of a new attack it was because the building maintained heavy damage from falling debris from the towers and yet they remained standing in madrid spain this building burned for nearly twenty four hours a raging inferno and it didn't fall building seven received minimal damage and suffered only a minor fire and yet the collapse of a concrete and steel structure due to a fire has never happened before september eleventh so how did the b b c know ahead of time that it was to come down unless the cover story that had been prepared for public consumption had been released in this case a little too early i don't think that there's any disagreement in the nine eleven research community that one of the strongest arguments that challenges the official story is the issue of controlled demolitions there are multiple video angles there are photographs there's witness testimony explaining that there were bombs and explosions going off in and around the trade center there is scientific data all supporting the charge that these buildings were brought down by demolition charges well if that's the case we have to ask the question what role did the planes play there are those out there that get very upset when we talk about pods or flashes or substituted planes well if these planes were indeed hijacked that would mean that the hijackers would either have to be a in collusion with those that had placed the charges in the north tower the south tower and in building seven one of the most secure buildings in new york city if not the most secure building well if it couldn't have been collusion with the only other option is coincidence the hijackers just happened to fly the planes into buildings that were scheduled to be demolished just minutes later well if it can't be collusion and it can't be coincidence then how could it have been terrorists all of a sudden the concept of flashes and pods and substituted planes becomes more plausible and it doesn't conflict with the idea of controlled demolitions but in fact supports the contention that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions the callous reports of bombs and explosions going off in and around the world trade center were completely ignored by the nine eleven commission and downplayed by the mainstream media william rodriguez his testimony before the nine eleven commission was completely deleted or shall i say censored why is there such an effort to suppress information and evidence that might challenge the official story why do government officials and the media consistently t ridicule or discredit those that would be in the best position to shed light on these irrefutable facts let's take a look now at what happened at the pentagon and see if the same methodology has come to play now i big jet was flying an unusual pattern near the white house over iraq he had parked very slowly it made one circle and then we have not seen it since the official story of flight seventy seven tells us that this plane waltzed all over the eastern united states and turned around over ohio at thirty thousand feet came back and hit the pentagon it bind thirty seven in the morning this was after eight forty six the world trade center had been hit virtually almost an hour after the world trade center had been hit and an hour and a half after the first multiple signs of multiple hijackings we're told this plane just waltzed into the most protected airspace in the world a nd hit the world's most protected building the biggest military headquarters on the planet this is already highly improbable timeline and my professional opinion based on my years of experience in my study of airline accidents and incidents it's my opinion that a boeing seven fifty seven did not hit the pentagon there would be an abundance of wreckage and that the official sources have not been able to produce the evidence of any wreckage large tough sections indestructible landing here indestructible engines wing seats anything of the sort indicates to me that a seventy seven did not hit the pentagon in relation to the pentagon it's quite obvious that no boeing seven fifty seven hit the building there are multiple lines of reasoning that support that conclusion including for example the complete lack of massive debris of the kinds of character that would be expected from a hundred ton airliner with a hundred twenty five foot wingspan in a tail it stands for you or feet above the ground they hit point was only about ten feet high and sixteen or seventeen feet wide on the ground floor you find on broken windows and damage fans a couple automobiles what you don't find is massive piles of aluminum debris you don't find the wings you don't find the seats the bodies  tail not even the engines were recovered indicating that no boeing seven fifty seven hit the building you've got a hole that's no more than ten foot high and about maybe fifteen to twenty feet wide that we're expected to believe a multi turned seven fifty seven jetliner with a wing span of one hundred twenty five feet the tail had the forty four feet that's four stories folks somehow managed to squeeze through this one little mini hole in the ground floor of the pentagon before the other wall collapsed which is about forty five minutes after initial impact there was only off one hole about fourteen to sixteen feet and supposedly the seven fifty seven completely penetrated the  sticking to the windows the windows are completely intact both adjacent where the wing should have penetrated and like the windows out and also directly above the hole where the elevated tail section would have penetrate and you know the ones are completely intact so i measured pieces of soviet equipment from photographs was my job i look at the hole in the pentagon and i look at the size of a there a plane that was supposed to have hit the pentagon and i said the plane does not fit in that hole so what did hit the pentagon what did where is what's going on a boeing seven fifty seven has a wingspan of nearly one hundred twenty five feet a length of one hundred fifty five feet and a height of forty four and a half feet as was reported if the plane was flying over five hundred mph common sense would dictate there would be some indication any indication of an impact of the tail section in the upper floors in addition the heaviest and most massive parts of an aircraft of this type would be the engines if there were to be any holes at all they would be located where the engines would have impacted the pentagon e in january of two thousand and four released its pentagon building performance report and along with that a video computer analysis of what happened when the mysterious flight eleven supposedly slammed into the pentagon let's take a look at the report what significant information was overlooked in this video from the american society of civil engineers well first of all the eighteen and a half inch steel reinforced concrete wall was omitted secondly you'll note that when the tail section enters the pentagon it remains intact how is this possible that the tail section over forty four feet in height could have remained intact as it entered the pentagon and left no entry point as a seen in this photograph thirdly and most significant of all is that this plane has no engines in this computer graphic model despite these omissions the s c e claimed that the plane took out fifty support columns in this photograph do you see support columns that have been destroyed at the world trade center towers we were told that the fuel fires burning from the planes were so hot that they melted steel and collapse the buildings in a pancake fashion high up in both towers the raging fires were no generating three to five times the heat of  nuclear power plant and if this were true for the world trade center towers wouldn't the same heat have been generated at the pentagon when we look at the photographs on page three thirteen of the nine one one commission report what we see is that to the north side the left side of the impact area that the walls all floors are totally intact the inner office walls are intact we see no fire damage as evidenced by the books not burning the computer intact the other things in the office intact so when we go back and see the official pentagon performance report it is sad that the aircraft sliced in taken all the while structures all the support beams well the wall structures are there the support beams are intact so there again the official report is contradicted by the photographic and video evidence other than the sixteen foot hole in the ear ring of the pentagon one of the most damning pieces of evidence to suggest an official cover up is an examination of the official flight path of american airlines flight seventy seven the flight data recorder information recovered in the pentagon wreckage shows the precise speed altitude and heading of the aircraft that we were told was flight seventy seven if we examine the direction that flight seventy seven took on its approach to the pentagon will note that the flight path is slightly different from that of the official report this may seem insignificant at first but how do we account for the light poles that were knocked down even though they were not directly in the path of flight seventy seven secondly if we take a look at the altitude of the aircraft we'll know that mere moments before flight seventy seven was to have impacted with light pole number one and light pole number two it was still two hundred and thirty five feet in the air how is it possible that flight seventy seven could have knocked over these light poles while it was at such a high altitude thirdly if we take a look at light poles three and four will note that they are outside of the flight path of flight seventy seven as well how did these light poles come down following the flight path of the n t s b as model of the flight data for american airlines flight seventy seven we can see the flight path highlighted in red note that the plane passes over a light pole that should have been knocked to the ground but remained standing after the event what would explain this anomaly is it possible that the plane that impacted with the pentagon was smaller than a commercial boeing seven fifty seven after reviewing the photographs and the video footage taken at the pentagon before the collapse of the outer to ring the experts that we've discussed this with scientists researchers physicists airline pilots and military experts all agree that the damage seen is absolutely inconsistent with a seven fifty seven having struck the pentagon it is more consistent however with a smaller jet aircraft hitting the pentagon possibly a small jet or a u s navy an unmanned aerial vehicle or maybe a global hawk missile in this photograph that was taken at the pentagon we clearly see some sort of an engine rotor but the question is is this a rotor from a seven fifty seven a rolls royce engine well according to john w brown the spokesperson for rolls royce engines in indianapolis he states it's not apart from any rolls royce engine that he's familiar with  it's clear that there's been a concerted effort to cover up information to distract and to deceive the american people and indeed the people of the world as to what happened at the pentagon on september eleventh with this in mind is it not possible that those behind this conspiracy could have removed evidence that would have challenge the official story and is it not inconceivable that evidence could have been planted to support the official story i know from my experience that it would have been highly improbable that even a seasoned american test pilot a military test pilot could have flown one eighty category aircraft like the seven fifty seven into the first floor of the pentagon because of a thing called ground effect efficient trajectory has this plane just skimming the ground at about five hundred miles an hour as it impacts with the building on the ground floor that turns out to be aerodynamically impossible even a small plane such as assassin at full throttle with it accumulate a packet of compressed gas which is there beneath the fuselage that would make it impossible for it to get closer than fifteen feet to the ground discussions with aeronautical engineers have convinced me that for a boeing seven fifty seven at five hundred miles an hour it could not get closer than sixty feet to the ground if the plane had been taking the official trajectory its engines would have been making massive damage to the to  wake turbulence would have been racking it the lawn would have been a mess instead the lawn is perfectly smooth green and smooth which turns out to be ironically a smoking gun at the pentagon ground effect and the pristine condition of lawn in front of the pentagon aren't the only problems with the official story the airline pilots that we talked with also have a very serious problem as to whether or not terrorists that were trained on small aircraft were even capable of maneuvering a large commercial airliner at such a high speed and making these very precise maneuvers i flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in nine eleven the flight number one seventy five in flight ninety three the seven fifty seven that allegedly went on to shanksville and flight one seventy five is the aircraft that's alleged to have hit the south tower i don't believe it's possible for a like i said for a terrorist a so called terrorist to train at a one seventy two then jump in the cockpit of a seven fifty seven seven sixty seven glass cockpit and vertical navigate the aircraft lateral navigate the out of the sky i couldn't do it and i'm just absolutely positive they couldn't do it what's unusual about the five frames that the pentagon released is they don't show a plane streaking across the pentagon lawn they just show a white paper trail the the date in the time on the pentagon frames is wrong you know it one of the most secure buildings in the world and at the bottom of these five frames they have the word playing it's like subliminal you know the word is there but the plane isn't the pentagon is the nerve center of the u s military when it comes to u s security all roads lead to the pentagon surveillance would obviously be the first step in maintaining safety and security take a look at your local wal mart and count the closed circuit video cameras surveiling the parking lot video cameras can be seen everywhere in our society are we to believe that the world's most secure building was only capable of capturing the event on video from two cameras at one location except for a hole in the ground basically that's right the only thing you could see from where we were was a big algae in the earth and some broken trees we could see some people working walking around in the area but from where we could see it i was on my any large pieces of debris at all there was nothing nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed or smoke fire nothing it was absolutely quiet it was actually very quiet nothing going on down there no smoke no fire just a couple of people walking around they looked like part of the n t s b crew walking around looking at the pieces how big would you say that hole was from iraq with i would guess it was roughly about twenty to fifteen feet in shanksville one of the things that's really remarkable is the associated press said that all the records that was recovered from the whole scene in the back of a single pickup truck and a few plastic bags you know there's just no way a big plane like that just completely disintegrates or you know reduces itself down to the debris here is spread over a three to four mile radius which has now been completely sealed off and is being treated as part of the f b i as a crime scene that's really all you see is a large crater in the ground and just a tiny tiny bits of debris there's been at least one report that the investigators out there and there are hundreds of them as i said tonight have found nothing larger than a phone bo observed to me it looked to him as though a boulder and been taken a ditch and when dogs had been filled with trash and blown up i had residents of the area call me to say that they told the f b i they heard an explosion in the arab before they heard any impact with the ground but the i refused to write it down i have other residents in the area right me and explained to me they were taken to a search area far larger than the officially designated crash zone to look for body parts and aircraft debris but told by the deputy sheriffs taking them that they would deny it if they mention this to anyone i have a former inspector general for the air force responsible for the conduct of a crash investigations tell me that if the plane had crashed as advertised the debris should have been scattered over an area approximately one city block in size in fact just distributed over eight square miles which is a scenario consistent with the plane having been shot down in the air but not one that crashed quote believer category and i i can't say that i would be a dyed in the wall skeptic but there's enough for information presented to cast some real down on the story as it's been presented with a lot of questions coming into my mind related to that the pentagon along with building seven at the trade center those two things are there are the biggest question marks in those in those holes on our although i never realized that  on may seventeenth of two thousand and six the pentagon announced that one p m that day they would release new footage that they claimed would clearly show flight seventy seven hitting the pentagon in anticipation of the release of this new footage here of phillips on n interview jamie mcintyre who is the c n n senior pentagon correspondent during this interview here phillips asked jamie mcintyre what his thoughts were on some of the ideas that something other than flight seventy seven had hit the pentagon having been there on september eleventh having seen the plane wreckage and photographed it myself personally i can tell you that that's nonsense i had a camera with me i took pictures of some of the wreckage some of the parts of the fuselage of part of the cockpit until they told us we had to move back away from the scene after hearing jamie mcintyre's statements with kara phillips in this interview we couldn't help but realize that they were inconsistent with his original live report at the pentagon on september eleventh let's take a look and listen carefully to what he said on that day from my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the pentagon the only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in and as i said the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand there are no large tail section wing sections fuselage nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the pentagon after realizing the blatant contradiction of jamie mcintyre's statements on september eleventh and the statements that he had made on kara phillips's interview we decided to put out a news release on may eighteen