your first of all the debunkers forgot that most of the television shots were taken from a distance with long telephoto lenses and they don't carry the actual sound from the towers while in the video shot by amateurs the soundtrack is usually covered by the screams of those standing around the camera in any case it's not true that no explosions were recorded by video cameras in this shot for example a series of loud concussions can be heard just before the collapse begins on the left covered by smoke is the south tower moments before the collapse hearing in fact explosions near building seven recorded up to a few minutes before the building collapsed and finally there was also someone who saw an explosion up close to his very eyes it's ronte francesco the same person who had descended from the ninety first floor of the south tower all the way to the lobby where he was exit in the building he heard an explosion sp and dozens of dramatic testimonies which describe the story of september eleventh quite different from the one we have been told so far question given that after the initial explosion and the ensuing fires there wouldn't have been enough jet fuel left to pour down the elevator shaft in substantial quantities can you explain the at least three separate explosions reported by multiple witnesses at the time of the first impact in the north tower in particular can you explain the huge explosion reported by multiple witnesses in the basement of the north tower moments before the impact of the plane can you explain what caused that huge explosion that literally devastated the lobby of the north tower according to multiple witnesses about one hour after the impact of the plane before the collapse of tower two can you explain what caused the big explosion reported by mr jennings and mr hess on the eighth floor of building seven before either tower collapsed can you explain what caused the multiple explosions recorded by different camera crews including the b b c and c after the towers had collapsed before the collapse of building seven can you explain how more than one hundred witnesses most of the firefighters and policemen could have all been mistaken in reporting explosions at the twin towers in september eleven another element suggesting controlled demolitions are the so called squibs the possibly three were noticed on the sides of the towers and the collapses took place squibs occur in controlled demolitions when concrete is forced we expelled from the building by the explosions occurring inside the individual explosions that i know is twenty and thirty and forty stories below the collapsing structure those are we demolitions guys call squids that's another characteristic that seems to be evident but for the squibs in the twin towers the packers have a different explanation i don't like that it's like a occur in any case this is clearly not broken glass glass fragments from a window would not even be visible from such a distance these are high speed ejections of concrete and other solid degrees which can only be explained by a powerful explosion having occurred nearby question given that what we see is clearly not glass from a broken window a concrete and other debris can you explain what caused this whips observed thirty or forty floors below the level of collapse technically speaking squibs are just a particular case of explosions occurring below the level of collapse but powerful ejections of concrete and other material have been observed throughout the entire collapse of both towers footprint fema has documented a twelve hundred foot diameter debris area around each tower where major chunks of the buildings were found this means that parts of the structure rejected laterally at a distance twice as large as that with the tower itself war question given that the falling upper sections of the towers had no additional energy to destroy the healthy structure below where the energy to hurdle these large chunks of structure in such a distance from the towers come from what's the smoke it settled and the recovery work commenced more evidence pointing at controlled demolitions started to emerge one example of the supporting columns cut at a forty five degree angle that were noticed sticking out of the ground this kind of cut is and then this piece will be deflected and this this place to some of those cuts on the larger chunks of the structure called candlesticks were made by iron workers during the removal operations but cut columns were noticed on the very evening of september eleventh far before the removal operations had started you controlled demolitions stated i'll confess this is extremely curious from a technical point of view as this is a very similar result to the one obtained with cutting charges another kind of cut commonly used in controlled demolitions is the so called because that's no is visible on this chunk of structure from building seven the same chunk exhibits also a forty five degree angle diagonal cut on the cross beam with a letter v cut at the end of the other team can you suggest a good reason why and workers would need to perform v cuts and a forty five degree cut on this piece of structure just to remove it from the rubble another element suggesting the use of explosives is the complete disappearance of the how trusses the large steel structures that connected and down the towers from above the how trus covered an area of one acre in size and sat on the very top of each building there was nothing above it could crush them except for the antenna on the north tower which in fact was supported by how truss if a simple gravitational collapse had occurred one would expect to find  trusses sitting on top of the rubble partially deformed maybe but still recognizable instead of steel structures each one acre in size seemed to have vanished into thin air from the hundreds of pictures taken at ground support of the end china seem to advantage completely possibly the most important unexplained phenomena ground zero are the extremely high temperatures registered under the rubble for many weeks after the collapses  september sixteenth nasa shot these thermal graphic images of ground zero indicating unusually high temperatures at the base of the three collapsed buildings despite the heavy rains of september fourteenth the hot spots registered peak temperatures of more than thirteen hundred degrees under the rubble ten days later the fires kept  the consequences of such extreme temperatures were quite visible on the steel that was being extracted from  that my god they are charlie veterans was a supervisor of removal operations a ground zero from p b s is america rebuilds page we read richard's crew picked up forty to sixty foot long pieces of steel impaled in the pile where the bottom twenty feet would be clothing red hot that your said trucks loaded with steel were passed by and you could feel the back of your neck burning standing twenty feet away in an article called a dangerous work site the u s department of labor wrote underground fires burn to temperatures of two thousand degrees fahrenheit this was confirmed by mary giuliani there were fires of two thousand degrees fahrenheit over the ground the journal of the american society of safety engineers wrote thermal measurements taken by helicopter he did a show to underground temperatures ranging from four hundred to more than twenty eight hundred degrees fahrenheit eight weeks later and the fires still have not subsided rubble as november turned into december ice was noticed in the mornings about the ground but the degree underneath was still smoldering good the weird thing was it was very cold when we were up there i believe it was it was and no wonder but the ground was a frozen ground kind of like both underneath your feet which was kind of strange to me it took until december nineteenth more than three months after the collapses for the last underground fire to be extinguished the debunkers have suggested different possibilities for this unexplained phenomen of these however seems to be a valid answer in regards to the gasoline the american society of safety engineers wrote three underground floors had been used as a parking garage for the total capacity of two thousand cars the cars were eventually located and removed some had exploded and were completely burned out while others were in pristine drivable condition the gasoline in a car he the explodes or remains inside the tank it does not leak out and go looking for fires to be fueled in regards to the generator tank the society of safety engineers wrote seventy two thousand gallons of diesel fuel were stored in a tank on basement level seven attempt was eventually located and inspected although slightly damaged no leaks were found the fuel was removed another proof of extremely high temperatures reached a turn the collapses are the twisted and mangled steel beams found at ground zero architects engineers people who work with steel welders have just never seen the level of destruction and the level of deprivation of this material in our lives year we are so i can't i don't know the answer it's true mr gross did this at the steel yards where the remnants of the towers had been collected but he must have been in a big hurry as he didn't even notice the high degree of defamation of massive steel beams sitting only a few feet away in any case there are several highly credible witnesses reported the presence of molten steel at ground zero which carlock a structural engineer working in ground zero said going below it was smoky and really hot here world trade center six over my head the debris past the columns was red hot molten running the supervisor from the national environmental health association blond burger stated feeling the heat seeing the molten steel the layers upon layers of ash like lava it reminded me  who provided the rescue workers with global positioning equipment stated sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage the end of the b would be dripping molten steel peter tully of tully construction said that he saw fools of literally molten steel at the world engineering at the berkeley university examine the remains of the twin towers he said i saw nothing of girders that world trade center if you remember the salvador dali paintings were the clocks that are kind of melted it's kind of like that that could only happen if you get steel yellow hot d again ignoring all these testimonies does not mean to have the presence of molten steel below the rubble it just means turning a blind eye to what the actual situation around zero was after the collapse of the twin towers and there's more concrete normally doesn't melt in regular fires in fact one of the reasons it's used in civil construction is its resilience to high temperatures yet molten concrete was found ground zero preserved at the new york police museum this artifact caption reads bunkers have argued that this cannot be molten concrete as the higher melting point of concrete would have also melted the steel from the gun but the molten concrete could have already been cooling off by the time it encountered the gutters in which case it would not have melted them instantly here for example is flowing from a volcano which is in the process of cooling off after having reached the melting point as one can see the lava surrounds the base of the trees not necessarily incinerating them at once in a hangar near kennedy airport so it's another artifact attesting to the extreme temperatures reached during the collapses this formation is really four separate stories of the world trade center compressed compacted incinerate exposed to temperatures as hot as the inner earth the other given that no major source of combustible seems to have been available underground can offer a comprehensive explanation for the temperatures up to twenty eight hundred degrees reported to ground zero for the long lasting fires underground where the  the almost complete pulverization of all the contents of the trunk hours beginning with the concrete floors had a simple gravitational collapse occurred one would expect a fight one hundred ten floors pretty much stacked up on each other like it happens in regular collapses in the case of the twin towers instead practically all the concrete from one hundred ten floors of the buildings was literally pulverized of computers desks chairs telephones printers and other office furnishings floor work over floor over floor all enclosed building this was one of the trading rooms of the world trade center and the floor simply collapsed on each other all these things would have later  merged from the rubble definitely crushed and torn but still recognisable almost none of that there wasn't much that you could say you could describe everything everything was  furniture the computers in the file cabinets the only things missing after the collapse of the twin towers were also filled with people inexplicably almost half of the victims bodies seem to have disappeared into thin air building collapses the victim practically no one arrived according to the chief medical examiner two thousand seven hundred forty nine victims died in the twin towers but fewer than three hundred whole bodies were recovered nearly twenty thousand pieces of bodies were found in the ruins more than six  enough to fit in five inch test tubes two hundred different pieces were matched to a single person one thousand six hundred thirty victims were eventually identified eight hundred of which by d n a alone this means that for eight hundred victims there were no body parts large enough to recognize the remaining one thousand one hundred nineteen victims were never identified this means that for more than forty percent of the victims not even a fragment large enough to  eleven hundred victims completely unaccounted for in other words no pieces large enough to gain any d n a from vaporized cannon fire and a gravitational collapse account for this massive  this not by the new york fire department shows the locations around the towers where human remains were found yellow circles are body parts from civilians that triangles are from firefighters the very just inside which some of the body parts were found remains inexplicable with a back after the impact of american eleven some debris exited the opposite side of the tower in a southerly direction but the view of the joint bank was blocked by the south tower at the time of impact and there was no direct line between the exit hole in the north tower and the roof of the georgia bank for the more i see in this map the body parts found on the roof belong not only to civilians but also to firefighters who were clearly not present in the north tower at the time of impact question can you explain how a simple gravitational collapse where the bodies remain trapped between pancaking floors could produce more than twenty thousand body parts out of two thousand seven hundred victims well more than eleven hundred bodies left no fragments large enough to extract a d n a sample can you explain how a simple gravitational collapse could have produced the bone fragments and body parts from civilians and firefighters that were recovered from the roof of the church of a building at this point we can summarize the evidence for a gravitational collapse and compare it with the one for controlled demolitions if it's an explanation for the initial collapse or sagging trusses theory is fundamentally flawed for at least three reasons there is no evidence that the fireproofing was widely dislodged from the steel trusses no evidence for temperatures high enough to seriously weaken the steel and no valid explanation on how the trusses could have pulled and broken the external structure on their own at the same time the initial collapse is fully compatible with a controlled demolition the official explanation for the total collapse of the twin towers does not exist nor was a scientific calculation ever attempted by nist as they have repeatedly acknowledged at the same time the full collapse of the buildings is fully compatible with a controlled demolition the vertical acceleration of the upper sections to near free fall speed makes it impossible to explain th collapses by gravitation only without violating at least two fundamental laws of physics at the same time the near freefall exhilaration by the collapsing towers is fully compatible with a controlled demolition the amount of witnesses who reported powerful explosions and the ensuing devastation in the twin towers is overwhelming such explosions cannot be explained by jet fuel alone while they are fully compatible with a controlled demolition squibs observed thirty and forty floors below the level of collapse cannot be explained by the air pressure in a gravitational collapse at the same are the typical signature of controlled demolitions or that i cannot cuts and he cuts observed on the columns of ground zero can be explained by the removal operations at the same time these kind of cuts are another typical signature of controlled demolition large area of debris around the towers with the lateral ejection elements wing several tons cannot be explained by a gravitational collapse at the same time these objections are fully compatible with the use of powerful explosives a long lasting fires the extreme temperatures under the rubble the incandescent beams extracted during the cleanup the high degree of defamation a massive steel beams the modern steel and morton concrete observed and found a ground zero cannot be explained by jet fuel alone regular office fires highly effective destructive devices capable of developing extremely high temperatures must have been used as part of a controlled demolition the almost complete polarization of the contents of both towers from the concrete floors to the office furnishings to the actual papers ation of victims bodies and  explained by a simple gravitational collapse at the same time these results are fully compatible with the presence of powerful explosives such as those used in controlled demolitions and that's a comprehensive scientifically sound explanation for all the phenomena observed is presented the only conclusion available is that the twin towers were brought down by some form of controlled demolition after they published a report on the twin towers nist moved on to tackle the collapse of building seven but they faced was no easy task contrary to the twin towers building seven had not been hit by an airplane it was only partially damaged by the collapse of the north tower and it suffered fires that were anything but devastating nothing could have suggested it was going to collapse on the other hand it looked like the perfect controlled demolition it featured the sudden onset of the collapse of the rapid exhilaration towards the ground the symmetrical descent  it even appeared to have started to collapse from the bottom as most controlled demolitions do professionals in the field of controlled demolitions such as dutchman then you wake up seem to have no doubt on what had happened city two thousand and one no tall building had ever collapsed primarily due to fire but that's exactly what investigators believe happened to the forty seven story world trade center building seven on september eleventh water instead of seven collapsed because of fires we really have hind of progressive collapse if you have discovered here in the five years progressive collapse according to nist the collapse was triggered by the failure of one specific column number seventy nine located in the northeastern section of the building organization these kinds of statements should have sent shock waves through the architectural world what they're telling us is that our existing building codes to which thousands of skyscrapers are currently designed and there is a serious problem if mists findings were true hundreds of skyscrapers from all over the world would suddenly be in danger of collapse due to fire this should have called for the immediate suspension of all highrise constructions widespread verifications and all existing skyscrapers and a serious revision of fire codes and safety regulations for the new ones to be built none of that has happened steel skyscrapers have continued to be built just as usual the ones that caught fire even when fully engulfed in flames have continued to remain standing and one of the basic tenets of scientific point of view even though this was an unprecedented event in history we are being asked by nist to take their word for the soundness of their conclusions is based on sound science and it is consistent with all the observations we have but this is what happened before right refused to make their data public structural engineers rail against nist because they refused to show the visualization it's a black box you cannot download any of this data this means that also for the accuracy of their computer model we have to take  real event while the animation shows a pronounced inward bending of the top of the structure the video footage shows the entire top section of the building maintaining its shape all the way through the visible part of the collapse this can be verified by different angles if this is what nist calls matching quite well one can imagine what the reliability of their entire report can be a similar problem is presented by the computer model nist has used to simulate the progression of the fires in the building this computer model was developed by nist and  has been allowed to verify it again we are being asked by nist to trust them on its validity or use a valid validated you know program developed at nist for studying the growth in spite of fires to calculate temperatures throughout the building on the right in the slide for example you see a detail fire simulation showing temperature of fires as the crew is bright one for twelve the graphic shows the temperatures in floor twelve lising after one p m and peaking around four p m on the northeastern side of the building but  the same picture nist has published in their report which was taken between three forty nine and three fifty four p m shows that the fires have already died off across the entire eastern section of the twelfth floor a similar picture taken between three fifty three and four o two p m confirms that the fires on the eastern side of the twelfth floor had already died off nist itself has stated in the same page that there is no indication of fires burning on the east side of the twelfth floor at this time in other words the accuracy of mr computer model doesn't even need to be verified as it's disproven by the very pictures and statements nist has published in their own report in order to justify the first and only collapse in the history of a steel skyscraper due to fire but the bankers have maintained that building seven was weaker than the average ste in fact it was the opposite after it was completed there the soviets didn't have the building reinforced beyond its requirements in order to accommodate the needs of its main text solomon brothers from this one nine hundred eighty nine new york times article we read salomon brothers intends to spend nearly two years and more than two hundred million dollars cutting out floors adding elevators reinforcing steel girders upgrading power supplies and making other improvements in its million square feet of space we built in an upper done see to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building structural integrity said there is silverstein president of the company more than three hundred seventy five tons of steel requiring twelve miles of welding will be installed to reinforce floors  there was one skyscraper in the world that should have never collapsed due to fire it was building seven well mr has been unable to come up with a valid explanation for a collapse due to fire there are at least three good reasons why such a collapse could not have happened in any case one is the widespread criminology of the event as we have said before the collapse of a steel structure due to fire is considered an absolute impossibility in the architectural world the steel structure of frame buildings high rise buildings simply fire we've never had a steel framed skyscraper collapse in the united states or internationally nor rise to a structure has ever been destroyed by fire in the history of construction consequently if building seven was truly brought down by fire it would down by four p m c n n had already picked up the rumor and was spreading it around the world we are getting information now that one of the other buildings building seven in the world trade center complex is on fire and it's either collapse or yes collapsing at five o'clock the c correspondent who was obviously unfamiliar with the landscape didn't recognize this has fueled ludicrous can spears he theories which accuse the mainstream media of having been informed in advance of what was going to happen on september eleventh in truth this incident only con that the information on the impending collapse had been circulating long enough in downtown manhattan to have already reached the b b c even before it happened at about the same time when c n n recorded the explosions near building seven they also captured the police clearing the area and announcing the collapse cross representative he got this into reverse read what's going on what's going on and all the time he had his hearing over the radio while he was getting the job done the ninety's was like the last three seconds he takes his hand off and you know three to one and he had this  have known about it so many hours in advance if the police clearing the area expected a structural failure due to fire why would they use such an expression as the building is about to blow up can you explain how an unprecedented totally unexpected collapse due to fire could be predicted with absolute precision by an actual countdown the second reason that makes the official explanation by and symmetrically which it pretty much does i believe all of those columns have to be removed within a ten second of each other question can you explain how the almost simultaneous removal of all the columns which was necessary for building seven to collapse in the way it did can be caused by fire alone the last and possibly most conclusive piece of evidence against the official explanation is great for after the initial failure of the penthouse on the eastern side of the building the entire structure came crashing down to the ground in a little more than six seconds back when architects and engineers presented nest with these calculations they forced them to correct their preliminary report and acknowledge the freefall of the building for the first eight stories of the collapse from this final report we read a more detailed analysis of the descent of the north face found three stages the first was a slow descent with acceleration less than that of gravity that corresponded to the buckling of the exterior columns at the lower floors the second stage was a freefall descent over approximately eight stories at gravitational acceleration for approximately two point five seconds two point twenty five seconds is more than one third of the global collapse once nist had admitted the freefall from one third of the collapse the outcome of the debate was sealed building seve alone would indicate that the official story doesn't hold water question can you explain how freefall which requires the almost simultaneous removal of the supporting structure can be achieved without a controlled demolition this very question was posed ok the truth this is an area that i am not very from here and if you would drop me a note and then sure that we talk on c span i'd be glad to get you a more complete answer but i it is unfortunate that senator mccain could not answer as he is the person who the foreword to the popular mechanics book debunking nine eleven myths in the forward mccain stated any explanation for nine eleven must start and end with the facts the evidence must be gathered and analyzed then only then can conclusions be drawn but now that the evidence has been gathered and conclusions can be drawn he claims ignorance on the whole matter this brings us to the last question which is not only for the debunkers but for anyone who cares about freedom democracy and an honest government if you were aware of solid evidence disproving here version and suggesting involvement of some go to elements of the governments in the terrorist attacks would be more unpatriotic and anti american to ask for a new investigation or to turn a blind eye to it and pretend such evidence doesn't exist given that the people's trust in institutions is a paramount importance for a nation's well being would that trust be better served by denying the evidence of a conspiracy by bringing those suspected to accountability in a court of law we leave the last word to the first responders who have been dying by the dozens after having inhaled the poisonous air from ground zero in the total silence of the media i want to tell you to the people we call heroes propagandists professional waters and trolls who cannot by any stretch of imagination be considered a journalist strike another nail into the coffin of another rescue worker i don't think we're crazy conspiracies only evidence the courts will hear we who are still dying from nine eleven who went to the towers and into that pile now live with those buildings in our lives and i just