supreme court for writing this letter on october twenty third i had a case before the supreme court on october twenty third to argue mr miller and sally land g engaged in extrinsic fraud upon the court and they had no legal capacity to appear i am very grateful that on october twenty third the court of appeals after getting the letter from the supreme court the court of appeals decided to hear my motion to modify that was filed with a court i filed a motion to modify on october twentieth and on october twenty second and mr miller who was the opposing attorney had intel nov ninth to file an explanation for his own ethical conduct and i am very grateful that the court of appeals and the supreme court both wanted mr miller to respond mr miller had until november ninth today's november tenth mr miller had until november ninth to put in a response to my motions my  motions were to respond to counsel's failure transform the court of appeals of change in status and respondents counsel authority and lack of standing and my other motion before the court was appellate objection to respond as coun comply with ethics are e p three point three which is candor to the tribunal and a request for c r eleven sanctions against mr miller and sally land him respond as counsel for improper threats this case has gone on for a few years and the reason why it was so significant is because dorothy was defrauded out of her whole life by these attorneys who did not represent anybody in this case i think that person is entitle to have representation by the attorney they choose endure think reagan never chose these attorneys to represent her and as of november ninth two thousand and nine mr miller had the chance to submit his explanation to the court and he has failed to do so so at this point in the history of this case the court now has to make a determination but i just saying that i am very grateful to everybody all the judges and all the court clerks for making it possible for me to get my ding court because i am very grateful that mr miller has to explain his behavior so thank you very much this is janet christensen o'brien thanking the court for allowing me the chance to require mr miller to respond because this document shows mr miller was notified that he has until november monday night to respond i've always been ordering a motion to disqualify the law firms because they do not represent any of the parties in this case so stay tuned in the future to whatever the court's ruling is thank you very much for watching public interest issues on scan  removed her five lawyers her medical doctors and her accountant so she couldn't file corporate tax returns for her charitable trust and her living trust and i don't want them to have been able to do that so let's make sure that she doesn't die  ability in the guardianship has already been terminated by the court in the court superior court it was terminated in january two thousand and nine and so the court doesn't have any jurisdiction to make her a guardian because she's already been terminated and she's already given up the bond so in essence what he's saying on the last page of his document is that yes he agrees with me has no authority but if you want to the court to tell him to get  and i've never been in rooms we there are twenty to thirty and the guy process server called me up he came over here he served me when i got the other document from mr miller and he mr justin phillips who a very nice man signed this little thing showing that he'd serve me so that i'd have proof that he'd serve me on the tenth you know the funny thing about this little subpoena is that i'm served november tenth two thousand and nine it says that i'm supposed to produce all the information that shows that sally lay him his engaged in tax fraud and she wants my correspondence from with the u s government and the department of  fictitious yeah yeah number of a living trust and they said it was a yeah never for a charitable trust which it was not but i think it's pretty unusual that sally lamb is asking me for all my correspondence that i have sent to the iris and to any u s government agency you know i like it on the next page where she specifically asking for calm for use of all correspondence that i've sent to the mercer island police to the f b i to the attorney general in any other agency and all the course once they've sent me back now wouldn't that be tampering with a whistleblower i'm a whistleblower i'm a c i a confidential informant i've charitable trust and the living trusts even though the attorney general wants to know who the trustee is but i'm sorry i have no clue who the trustee is but they failed to file tax returns and they failed to file amended tax returns for the tax returns for the charitable trust that they've already filed so this is kind of interesting she sent me that on the attempt to intimidate and threaten me in mr miller's document came to me on the tenth she i guess didn't expect me to get it because she sent it to the wrong address custodian of records a naturist that i had never been at well we're planning to attend this december tenth deposition i think it's very amazing that she's engaged in tampering with a witness and i would really like somebody from the u s attorney's office to assist me because i don't understand how this woman can get copies of my correspondence with the f b i and the i r s and now she can get the correspondence they've sent back to me to be it seems like she can't get in ongoing investigation record herself if she asked the i r s or the f b i so how can she get those documents from me so th much i'm just keeping you informed that i did get served notice of these things but as it shows our mr miller's assertive think it of service mr miller did not send notice of this document to all the p sorry i don't have the last page of that document let me see oh yeah i forgot to tell you that sally gave me ten dollars for this here's your little jack this response he's trying to strike my document my assets and stephen greatest assets when the liquidated dorthy great his house with all the assets in it because dan clearly lived his mother's house before he went into the hospital and died oh mr miller didn't send notice to all the parties he just  notice to me and sally but he really didn't ever mail the noticed me even though he's saying on this that he mailed the notice to me i got this from the courthouse angst usually mails it to me and sally but that's not adequate service because he's got a survey all the necessary parties under our e p eighteen point five even his current response doesn't serve all the necessary parties fill in three spots to him argues that he didn't serve all the necessary parties and all of his documents in two thousand and seven but they've never been notified by the opposing counsel and as my last page shows the necessary parties would have been mr miller sally ham michael long year  donna johnston had dorothy gregg has will and estate documents the originals and chief e mailed me in january and i emailed her back that you know give them to tony gre she's never emailed me since then so i don't know if she ever did give them to tony gregg but the will of dorothy gregg who was in the position of donna justin who was dorothy great guys lawyer so there's a lot of confusion in this case by mr miller because he forgets that he's got to comply with our e p a eighteen point five are e p a eighteen point five specifically says that you have to give notice to all the parties well as mr miller's document shows he did not give notice to all the parties so even his response that was served on me on november tenth not november so it doesn't comply with the court's request that he get it in on the night mr miller's certificate of service doesn't comply with the court rules either so thank you very much for listening and see what the court does now  have can request documents from me that the f b i and the i r s and other agencies would not give to her because they never give talking points about an ongoing fraud partners in care removed or think greg is money during a tax levy and they never given it back he put it into an account at u s bank and they've never accounted for that money and so he lay ham and grigor can all those people have never counted for the charitable trust a living trust and again curly's estate or stephen great as a state they've just commingle dole that money and it's just kind of disappeared i'd like somebody to make an accounting for all the money terminated or guardianship authority there to the court during the time where the mr miller was it or in the court record giving his change of address and he didn't comply with our e p eighteen point five with that either he didn't give notice to everybody of this change of address when he was filing that i was filing this notice that dank early died a kindred kindred hospital but before he died he was living with his mother and that all his assets were in the house and they were illegally converted where are his assets have his kids been notified know his kids have never been notified that they should make a claim for the estate brian currently has one of the kids he's never been notified and i think that these kids should have their inheritance their entitle to their inheritance i said in this letter no accounting has been made for the charitable trust as it is the living trust assets that are in  possession or if they're not in her possession why doesn't she get them from her gorelick right doesn't she make the deal make an accounting why doesn't she make partners in care make an accounting you know who is she hiding asses for does she really work for thank you very much we've given sally my address in she says this document to six a one first avenue well there's no such number in there's no such address those she's known for years i'm at six hundred first avenue so you know it's just kind of ridiculous so the deposition is going to be held see there's no such person no such address the pro or processor read to give me a call i told him i'm over here come over and serve me so anyway the deposition is going to be at december tenth at ten pm at sally's office should think that's kind of peculiar she's she threatened me she's harassed me she physically assaulted me on october eleventh two thousand and seven in the court room she's what file forged documents with the court and she's basically lied to the supreme court about her capacity because she didn't represent anybody at the oral hearing in the supreme court and now she's trying to tamper with witnesses again  by having a deposition where i produce all the letters that the f b i is sent me and i've sent to the f b i all the letters that the iris osip me and that i've sent to the i r s i mean what is the world coming to when a court on october eleventh two thousand and seven and she filed to forge documents in superior court and she misrepresented her capacity in the supreme court as a whistleblower i can't understand how she could be entitled to my correspondence pat at this fax number is the woman i deal with at the i r s and she's always told me that she referred all my faxes to the fraud division of the iris i think it is tampering with a witness me for me to disclose my correspondence with sally land him in my protected from leasing my confidential correspondence to sally that's what i wrote to fred over the i or f b i and this is what i wote to pa her she can be entitled to my correspondence i think that is tampering with a witness so i said the two letters to both of these people so they can give in to whoever they have to give them to because i cannot believe that as a witness and as a witness whistleblower i have to give my correspondence to and from the f b i and the iris to sally a lawyer when my correspondence to the f b i in the iris is about sally engaged in tax fraud so those are my two little letters so i thought i'd let you see them and i'm just waiting for the deposition which is on december tenth when she's basically tampering with a witness again but sally wants to have all my correspondence and their correspondence to me from the mercer island police but this woman katie knight who appeared in court now she's saying she she just was there for her you know standing up and she's saying that  the way she heard about me is by my shoe in them and that they don't have any file and then i filed a tort claim against him and that's the only reason she knows about me well i'm sorry little woman why were you in court then you know were you trying to threaten and intimidate me to so anyway yes  i'm trying to figure out how to record