hello my name is janet christensen o'brien i own seattle detective bureau and it's a private detective firm i'm licensed and i'm drawn to it and i want to talk that there have been sealed documents in the file one of the cases is dorothy gregor one of the cases of michael long here is the attorney who represented people in that case one of the cases is arthur hayes is case and michael lon you're represented one of the people in that case in the cases these attorneys are being given notice julie s appeal which she's never talked to her period and she died so how can a gregory miller represent somebody when they've never talked to them one of the rules of canon is you've got to communicate with your quiet not the client's daughter and michael on your sealed documents in these cases and now all of these attorneys are given notice that sealing these files sealing it without notice to different parties is improper and king county here's a letter from king county and it is notifying these attorneys all of his lawyers one of them michael long years another one of them that the cases are going to be investigated and may be unsealed i think it protects the public when documents are unsealed because it shows whistleblowers like me who have complaints about the attorney's actions in those cases an example is in the dorothy great case sally lan ham and michael long year the property of dorothy gregg was sold for a million three to a friend of the attorneys and it wasn't itemized in the guardianship and it wasn't itemized in the probate and don great only received one hundred thousand well what happened to the million three for the sale of the property and what happened to the log cabin house office housing in redmond what happened to all the other properties that was put in a charitable trust and when b d a b t o filed a tax return for that in it he they use the e i in number for a living trust that was established after stephen great died so what happens to these assets when they are not properly identified and that's the reason why sealing these files is so significant because it hides the truth from the public it is very significant to have these cases on sealed so that the public and people who are investigating maybe like the i r s or maybe like anybody can see what happened to these assets  in this case these attorneys are being put on notice the ceiling of documents was not done property properly under the g r twenty two rule king county department of judicial administration sent these people a letter lauren nelson is the party who sent this letter out to these people identifying that these cases were being looked into because they were not properly sealed these documents it says g r g r twenty two allows the use of cover heads up for sealing documents a family law and guardianship cases brought under the following statutes chapter eleven point eight chapter eleven point ninety two chapter twenty six zero nine chapter twenty six ten chapter twenty six twelve chapter twenty six eighteen and so forth c r twenty two and therefore the use of cover sheet for the purpose of sealing documents is not authorized and no other authority in these case files for sealing these documents so would it saying as my declarations to the court saying that the attorneys are misrepresenting their capacity and they are not accounting for the funds that are properly before the court and they are hiding assets my documents that were sealed my declaration that was sealed all the documents that were sealed are improperly sealed and the court should allow those documents to be unsealed so that the public is protected and whistleblowers are protected now i am very grateful that this woman and her name is lauren nelson adult protective supervisor probate supervisor adult probate supervisor is looking into this and they are auditing she's an audit probates are for advisor and she put a c c in the court files so that judges when they look at these cases they will know that there is something wrong with the sealing of these documents and that these documents are only sealed to protect the attorneys and not the ward and not the public i am very very grateful that in these cases these cases are being looked into because cases like this should not be sealed because these financial documents and these declarations from individuals are there to protect the public this case in particular was guardianship dear guardianship services of seattle this letter is to inform you that during the course of the review of the court file we found that one or more documents were filed and sealed in the advanced cases with a c r twenty that without proper authorization they are telling these individuals guardianship services of seattle they are saying to these attorneys michael long year that case that documents were sealed without proper authority there this is very very significant because there has been a cover up of rights by the ceiling of documents without due process of law i hope that people look into the dorothy craig case and i hope that people look and to the arthur hayes case because i think it's very very significant that michael long year was the guardian of the estate of arthur hayes and he also was a member of the l l c and the manager of the l l c and in the dorothy grady case michael long year and gregory miller and sally len ham filed documents without proper due process a notice to individuals  i was insulted in court by sally landingham and the jail saw that and nobody did anything sally land him access my bank deposit slips of my cash out tickets without a court order very very glad that king county is looking into the fact that these attorneys have been improperly sealing documents to hide records and they've been sealing documents under g r twenty two cover sheet without proper authorization so thank you for watching public interest issues and i hope that people look into this some of the case numbers is king county case number zero seven two four zero zero seven five five nine three king king county case number another case number is zero seven two oh seven seven zero seven five five nine three so this is the same case that these attorneys are they're looking into this because it was improperly sealed but all of these seem to have the same case number on them but i have personal knowledge that dorothy greg is case and arthur hayes case were also documents were sealed so we need to look into this as a public interest in a shoe thanks for watching public interest issues t v on seattle community media thank you