an anomaly he's a public official and most people that are in these positions they do what their boss says they just keep in the done you choose what you want i mean that's kind of silly ok but  heavily conflict of interest here is something who controls your food and drugs the f d a this is two thousand and seven the f d a a report by f d a scientists of the a administrators who is mike one is michael taylor a lawyer from monsanto you know what i mean there's worse used to be hearing other people but they move along and it's called incestuous relationship the forever change but the scientists were fed up with it and they put out this report f d a science and mission at risk who try to look for this because they're trying to take this down quickly it's a blue thing with the test tubes and as summarized as you can go through the data and are summarize it for you the f d a as currently configured the administrators they do not know the science of genetics they can't afford are not willing to spend to get it and they do not believe in what's hard to believe in something you don't know so i kind of get it you don't believe you don't know if you can afford it ok and he says it's especially true in the section of food safety but it says one nice thing kind of on me now don't say particularly  that's the dragon vaccine guys ok now when i was with w h o in one nine hundred ninety two on work we tried to coordinate all the agencies from europe australia japan of the to get on the same sheet of music and we thought we kind of did a good job was nice to know we kind of did a good job and it's nice to know that what we thought and the principles we based it on hold true regardless of what these guys want to do very so thank goodness i was redeeming here or something new this is pediatric pediatricians concerned about childhood pesticides exposure the american academy of pediatrics they are asking here's the other website there's an alert in the last two thousand haven't there peter traditions should look very very carefully at the pesticides that the kids are exposed of kids are very sensitive and they're very alarmed because of the combination a b c news richard besser that medical guy he used to be head of c d c he's you have to sterilize the fields to grow the g m knows and that's why we got so many passive sites and then we had us this was two thousand and nine this is a fantastic study that round up the old ground up that we thought was safe actually is pretty safe alone but there's a carrier molecule with it it's called a surface like a detergent kind of breaks on the cell wall so the round that can penetrate well no surf actin but law me whole sarah leave me these guys out of france they actually trust the combination and there's a look in combination it's hard and in test tubes in cell cultures and he said this is what's leading to birth defects this is a very good article because monsanto responds and monsanto said hey you know that test tube stuff that is not real life ok that's not real life who is seeing real life argentina go on the internet argentina block monsanto's entrance because of birth defects and what does monsanto saying now about real life they were here they came to debate me five years ago in front of maui medical society dr goldstein the lead medical guy for months on talk and he said we can never i said have you tested these things for safety said no no thank god you agree and we can never do it and you can defects from the monsanto the jim rose he said maybe it was process sides kind of forgot that you guys do pesticides and them but he said there are so many count founding variables that the test that i can almost quote you have to take somebody lock them away for thirty years and freedom nothing but g m o foods in a controlled environment so check this up when they do the controlled environment the french that's not real life when we asked to do the realized study by labeling it on our that's not that's not control so neither is good enough for them because the next guy to talk we have a drug lipitor or for cholesterol and he says well i'm glad we test that in real life because grapefruit juice interferes with lipitor so we would never know that unless we t and canadians physicians ph d s but beyond that the common sense i mean the government's answers are empty too i'm just looking for some common sense and some answers these guys have a very strong position came out in two thousand and nine and they helped us more we're blocking jim collins their position is all physicians should tell all their patients we do not know the risk of g m foods i'm not seeing a heart grow it just like that little vial of white stuff i don't know what the  second these recommendations are pretty strong when you see something unusual quantitative or qualitative in your population you are to consider genetically modified foods now me i would consider pesticides to now that we know that person next they claim they want a moratorium on these products till an independent group proves they're safe and the ones already out there that we can't seem to call back label notice they don't say th ban we don't like the word ban because it sounds kind of emotional we like moratorium until you are whether trust me try to stick with moratorium if you told me we had a can a risky g m food but i think we're going to cure cancer wall the benefits might outweigh the risk and we move forward a bad hand sounds too subjective you know i think this hey you hate this we go with data when we win in court is based on that yes environmental impact statements you're not going to yachts environmental or health and this is a life form so the judge that they are great with you know until you can do this ok this is a two page thing is very easy to read the second page of full full full of animal studies it's really easy to remember all the toxicity of alan's face the twenty one origin system which has been shown to be affected yet i think that's the heart of all the rest no cancer in this group doesn't cancel out that these guy didn't get cancer from smoking really i mean that's kind of silly we just go through this and there's only one this is the final thing i told you i would ask is are we gambling with our future eating g m foods and the answer is clearly no because remember what gambling is you know the odds of losing and so i choose to gamble in the g m o foods you have no idea what  the negative side are so i think gambling is like jumping in a hole and you actually don't have dippers then contamination of a life or if you and i were to gamble and you said ok forget it i'll tell you the odds of whatever organic get contaminated you lose and you never intended to gamble and the final thing and gambling is when this is gone on long enough you keep losing i keep paying you sick kick ass kicking can we please quit well you can't it's a life fo ok so on these three things alone that you don't know the other losing you seem to contaminate the guy wasn't gambling and once you decide we've had enough we cannot stop because a life form that is happening there's a term for that and it's either negligent or reckless i can't remember is one of the there are three i put it out there negligent or reckless now if you do not think we have contamination it's all over the internet and you look at here's a cook study bear l l zero one long grain rice which is never approved for consumption well they planted it from whatever ninety three to ninety nine or something and then they pulled it off the market and five or six years later you know they were going to more rice again it was contaminated and so they looked hard to distinguish contaminated i thought we pulled it out the fields they'd spent a billion dollars looking and they could not find it was it in the lab was it in the field was it in the like hurricane katrina when you see the hurricane you don't even know what it is and you cannot declare after god number one and they said ok ok let's just move forward next year we're going to plan we've got seed they look in their seed was contaminated and by the way when they declare act of god for bear el al six o two it's kind of you know being kind of facetious but that's how it goes now that's going to end the star here's all the things we won we won mostly in the in the in the court we've won in the study i was working with bruce and joe and i'm such a and i guess we're going to try for the moratorium but it won't be through council people it'll be a referendum that it's really the way you should go if it's so worrisome that you going to put a and our position how it has been any combination of chemical drugs or person side is considered a new drug or combination to proven otherwise now i just ask them the e p a do you agree strong just no answer some of the citizen says he's talking to you and he says each of the compound has been tested separately now that wasn't a question a combination has been used that has to be proven other compounds when tested separately we use one thousand fold below the threshold that some of the compounds and then i've presented studies where the synergism is three thousand to seven thousand fold me occupation they agree one hundred percent compounds of drugs new products are proven otherwise the american academy of environmental medicine they would tell you not to plan while you compound in the drugs don't forget the g m o's maybe there's a g m o we do things in paris we don't try to second guess what we think it's going to be and that's called deterministic or risk assessment and i just want to zoom ahead why it's so if it why are we moving ahead with conflict of interests conflict of interest conflict of interest financial conflict of interests now i'll read this for you there was a bare conflict of interests with drugs and vaccines the pharmaceutical guys were really presenting have to data we had to recall many things and so all the people this is back in two thousand and five i think there's a great theory all the regulators have conflict of interests all the testifiers of conflict of interest every time we call a meeting together we bring into stakeholders when we regulated drugs and vaccines for the world health organization that was a stupid thing to say hey i got all the regulators those guys got the conflict not the regulators  got all the stakeholders that's the drug companies why would you have a drug company voting on the value of the drug so we exclude the financial stakeholders but not in america not in our government we like stakeholders the only valid stakeholders are consumers but the n i m h opes the and i each try to weed out all the conflict of interests and they said it's so infiltrated into our regulatory agencies we're going to defy define it for you first before we tell you how do we move it must cover financial interests gifts gratuities favors nepotism and other such areas such as political participation and bribery what is political participation doing between is charming they said about me tonight just ignore that they do not like comments like all those politicians they always correct you on the spot you didn't mean that you mean some politicians there certainly are good ones so i think try again and again sometimes i slip and i thought as lawyers now that you don't mean that there are some good lawyers and they said that number one do not be cynical when you go out there don't be cynical don't say you monsanto there are good guys in monsanto they are being suppressed by their head of the real good guys quit because they can't stand it anymore and you see i'm coming through so don't be cynical ok and try to the g m of labeling him put in son and i was horrified to see ross baker shut it down and it was simply wrong what was done my question is was their input into the activity from the organization that you work for was that i asked for was that welcomes and what was the input yes we've been going to the state senate for the last five or six years you never hear about it because we never seem to move out of our state gosh that state guy was so good but now we got new guys and so will be promising i really did forget to go over the list of all the counterarguments monsanto says so i try to sneak one in with each question what will they say these promoters these mutations they're natural they use a promoter cauliflower music virus when you eat cauliflower there's a mosaic virus what's your problem it's natural  water is natural in the wrong amount in the wrong presentation to kill you salt is not your oxygen is not true in a newborn in a blind you this is not a question of natural it's a question of timing and quantity yes the question was the past chemicals that we have used in sugar cane and pineapple percolate into the water supply now that's why some of our water supplies are closed close off right that's why sometimes the e p a says no each of those combinations that we used to use are there but there are below the limits to but you should also say they're in combination you have to prove safety in combination and really guys when you think about it what does combination mean because the industry will say there's a lot we didn't spray em together we sprayed one in the morning one in the afternoon so if you spread together this combination if they environment and overlap this combination if they don't persist in the environment but persistent you clearance from the body that's combination and finally if they clear the body believe some kind of damage like to your liver then the other one comes along and the damages your other part of the liver that's combination the damages overlap this combination you've got they've got a long way to go to prove the stuff is safe and you know the economy what do the economies are like you going to bust the bank is expensive impossible to do well guys we have alternatives we could not use them in just plant organic stuff this is not this is not the cure to cancer by the way when they come to you for informed consent will you let by you that you could eat maybe and what are the benefits feed the world all right just say it then to feed the world you put me at risk i can choose not to i can choose not to and if that's one person says or an inside it the answer is no lifeform ok the question was when i talked to the homeland security guy who said model cropping is good for us to give that yeah we aren't the kind of collateral damage but eighty percent of the rest of the nation their food supply has jamal's the next issue people will tell you it's contaminated all our rice and corn and soy it's hopeless it's contaminated there's only maybe five or six types of mutations that's like i dumped five or six drugs in your water supply odd as it is at least you didn't have a double fifteen or seventy they tell us ahead of time so we can not be there i can only tell you about the co i the outbreak in the elementary school three or four times on co i where they spray next to the g m company  the way they spray they plan to spray and they're supposed to tell them we plan to spray they could but they don't they don't even have to disclose but some days when they said well we're going to break today the winds are bad and they don't spray sometimes they start to spray in the winds are bad you can we just kind of finish up that's when the kids got sick and the kids kind of had classic symptoms of some of the pesticides they were parades spraying the next question was suppose you spray and the rains come  the wind condition was correct to spray but it rained and flooded it into the ocean i don't know if you know about this but coal why a massive die off at the river mouth that of the waimea river mouth surrounded by those fields by fifty thousand dead sea urchins the e p a uses the sea urchin as one of the markers for environmental toxicity ok so everyone said hey look it up and what was the e p a s response stonewall again i mean i don't know how to interpret stonewalling but you are correct except the winds change so frequently here it's kind of like team burning the smoke they started off and then the winds change like wow it's already left oh ok the question is i think that means personally how would you protect yourself me i'm kind of  hob i don't pay attention that much only because my wife pays attention show sort out my diet so i took a chill go through it if she didn't go through it i would have to do it ok the brazilians focus exactly on organic it's not even a it's not even a question of labeling they know what's contaminated focus we're not going to label the bad crops you know canola corn try to avoid those and which is very good because our food sovereignty at least the starch as we are supposed to grow our own star chips right when the chips stop coming i'm not going to say where's my bell pepper i'm going to say where's my we my rice and my corn but look at the hawaiian where the native thing carlow sweet potato bread fruit and cooking banana planting that's on her mind but everyone likes cooking banana those are high fiber starches those are actually really good for you kind of easy to grow and if you grow them sweet potato that thing grows like a we need and some people say won't i grow so much i can't eat or i'll bet you can contract like the big island with the hotels and they will offer to the tourists local food believe me the guy didn't fly two thousand miles to eat the stuff we flew under the car go talk with them and the chef can make anything local to reffing ok so we should try to move to food sovereignty but mean that number one number two if you say in the history of life are bets you some gene crossed into your gene because of the virus yeah i admit that i share stuff with the spirit but my ancestors paid a price if that crossing was not useful it died out and over the billions of years i'm left with useful stuff you are trying to russian and force it on us and all the horrible things which my ancestors paid during the millennium is going to appear on us quickly and like i said why are you doing this ostensibly it's to feed the world but i think it's well proven we can feed the world just by redistribution diversification et you're right i never actually thought was the fruit contaminated but for sure it was in the leaf they feed the leaf to the cattle so they don't waste it to help the clore is concentrated in the mouth of cattle like the class of chemical