mark twain once said if you don't read the newspapers your uninformed if you do read them you're misinformed my hope for today is that the assembled press here will do their best to rectify that statement my name is richard gage a i a a member of the american institute of architects i'm a licensed architect for twenty two years i'm the founder of the nonprofit organization architects and engineers for nine eleven truth which came into being almost four years ago when i was first confronted by the piercing of the myth surrounding nine eleven in his book the ground truth why does john farmer the senior counsel for the nine eleven commission state that at some level of government at some point in time there was an agreement to not tell the truth about what happened that lack of truth is backed up by architects and engineers with quote after quote on our website such as from petition signer alfred lopez who states am a structural engineer with forty eight years of experience in all types of buildings i agree that fire did not cause the collapse of the high rise buildings the most realistic cause of the collapse is that the buildings were explosively demolished and from architect dennis holloway it was the discovery of molten steel in the debris that made me realize that something was really wrong about the mainstream media coverage of the towers and from architect jerry lewis mccarthy it's very hard to understand the complete lack of concrete rubble in the debris field even had the basements filled with concrete floor slabs debris there should have been a stack of flora limits at least nine or more stories above grade i haven't been able to reconcile the promoted theory of collapse with the way i know buildings to behave today i'm quite pleased to announce that now we have more than one thousand architects engineers signed on to the eighty nine eleven truth petition demanding of congress a new and truly independent unimpeachable investigation into the destruction of the three world trade center skyscrapers on nine eleven after careful examination of the official explanation of the destruction of these three buildings along with the eyewitnesses testimony and forensic data that was omitted from the official reports we along with others other professionals in the nine eleven truth movement have concluded that a new independent investigation into these catastrophic events is both necessary and essential to the preservation of our democracy even the f b i has weighed in citing that our work is quote backed by thorough research and analysis writes michael j heimbach assistant director of counterterrorism division so what's going on here that even the f b i can see but the mainstream media and our other government officials cannot or will not we will present a very brief outline of the explosive evidence compiled after which you'll have the opportunity to have your questions answered following this there will be an opportunity to interview our speakers more detailed information of course can be found in our d v d nine eleven blueprint for truth the architecture of destruction available on our website eighty nine eleven truth and provided to you in your press kits let's see what a typical controlled demolition looks like the way they do this is by placing explosive synchronistically time floor by floor through the building so that we bring the building down symmetrically vertically and almost freefall acceleration using the buildings weight to do much of the destruction so the result of a typical controlled demolition is a sudden onset of destruction at the base of the structure a straight down symmetrical collapse into it's own footprint because demolition wa remove the columns supports this results in a freefall acceleration almost straight down through what was the path of greatest resistance a total dismemberment of the steel structure has resulted where that's broken up and ready for loading and shipment a minimal damage to adjacent structures is always good sounds and flashes of explosions are heard and seen by witnesses we have enormous clouds of polarized concrete of course from the explosives we have squibs or explosive isolated jets occurring at different points in the building and of course we have chemical evidence in the debris pile evidence of cutter charges all of this is direct evidence of explosive destruction and guess what fire can't create any one of these let alone all ten if we have additional supporting documentation like government documentation quite helpful expert corroboration for knowledge and video documentation knowledge because that takes months to plan and execute a controlled demolition this is all proof beyond a reasonable doubt of controlled demolition do we have any of these characteristics in building seven most americans most all architects and engineers in fact know nothing about the third worst structural failure in modern history building seven a forty seven story skyscraper a football field away from the twin towers was not hit by an air lane and yet at five twenty in the afternoon it collapses in a manner in which we'll see we noticed that the north tower came down and some of the debris from it landed all the way over onto building seven but here it is standing through the morning in the afternoon and it comes down at five twenty let's see if there's any of the characteristics of explosive controlled demolition in buildings seven's destruction starting with do we have a sudden onset of destruction at the base of the structure in the d v d that you have you'll see plenty of witnesses that describe sounds of explosions do we have a straight down symmetrical collapse into the building's footprint let's listen to dan rather dan never repeated these words on mainstream media after that day in fact most of us hardly any of us have seen building seven coming down it won't be played why we'll see let's take another look from west street smooth symmetrical straight down let's bring it back up and house walls one second before the rest of the building let's take a look side by side we have building seven on the left and a known controlled demolition on the right is there any similarity is there enough similarity to warrant a new investigation into the possible use of explosives why  nist not look at the most obvious hypothesis these are the fires that are said to have caused the destruction of this building eight to ten fairly small fairly scattered fires this one on the twelfth floor which is the cited as the initiation of collapse but we have a statement from nist in appendix l that says they have photos that show that fire went out in that area at least an hour hour and a half before the building collapse so that area was cooling already this is a huge problem for the official story how do we bring a building straight down into its own footprint we have to remove the columns supports twenty four of them in this case and all of them within a tenth of a second of each other any deviation in that pattern and the building will begin to tip the question is can a fire especially those fires that you saw be responsible for this level of precision big problem for the official story lets see how fast this building comes down in just six and a half seconds at freefall acceleration as fast as this piece of thermite is falling through the air is how fast this building comes down in the first one hundred feet freefall acceleration the building is accelerating getting faster and faster straight down through what was the path of greatest resistance how does that happen we have to remove all those columns and it appears that we have the total dismemberment of the steel structure a forty seven story skyscraper moment steel frame resisting columns beams welded robustly together collapse like clouds of concrete suspended in the air fueled by the expansion of these gases from the extreme lee hot temperatures associated not with those eight to ten small fires but with something else that we going to be looking at in a moment racing at thirty five miles an hour in every direction away from the building at this point i would like to invite dr david ray griffin up dr griffin will bring additional perspective this morning on the questionable science of nist author of the mysterious collapse of the world trade center seven why the official report about nine eleven is unscientific and false dr griffin is a professor  philosophy of religion and theology emeritus at claremont school of theology in claremont graduate university the author of thirty six books nine of which are on the subject of nine eleven his most complete statement about nine eleven the new pearl harbor revisit a publisher weekly's pick of the week in two thousand and eight his work on the nine eleven issue has prompted his nomination for the nobel peace prize dr david gregory a recently discovered paper on conspiracy theories b appointee cass sunstein has rightly been receiving a lot of negative attention but this paper also makes an important contribution pointing out that an idea cannot be rejected simply because it is a conspiracy theory because there are true as well as faults conspiracy theories we can decide between a true and a fault theory of course only by examining the evidence sunstein says that the government's nine eleven conspiracy theory according to which the nine eleven attacks resulted from a conspiracy between osama bin laden and one thousand members of his al qaeda organization is true while that of the nine eleven truth movement is felt but it provides no evidence for either claim the nine eleven truth movement however has presented an enormous amount of evidence to support its claims for example in  thousand and nine book the mysterious call outs world trade center seven i have shown that the report on this collapse put out by newest the national institute of standards and technology is unscientific and fault it is unscientific because it can make its major negative claim that the building was not brought down by explosives only by ignoring multiple testimonies about explosions going off in the building by ignoring a piece of steel from the building that looked like a piece of swiss cheese even though fire could not have gotten anywhere close to the temperature needed to melt steel by ignoring particles of metals in the dust that could have been produced only by extremely high temperatures and by ignoring the existence of nano thermite the nist report is also unscientific because it can make its major positive claim that the building was brought down by fire only by telling rather obvious lies for example that a huge fire was burning on the twelfth floor at five p m even though in it two thousand and four interim report nist had a photograph showing this fire to be completely burned out by four forty five and that the building collapse because it's girders were not connected to the floor studs even though that same two thousand and four report indicated that the girders were connected with sheer studs the nist study is unscientific finally because  affirms a miracle in the sense of a violation of basic principles of physics only months before news put out its final report its lead investigator sharm soon correctly stated that freefall would have been physically impossible in a fire produced collapse but after high school physics teacher david chandler demonstrated in a youtube presentation that the building came down in absolute freefall for over two sockets nist affirm this imperial fact while still maintaining its fire theory of the collapse it therefore affirmed what it had previously acknowledged to be impossible the government's theory about the collapse of world trade center seven has therefore been disproved as thoroughly as any theory could be this is one of the reasons why one thousand li architects and engineers are calling for a new investigation and let me add that this is a big week for nine eleven truth does this week six major stories have appeared in the danish press based on interviews with professor niels herit of the university of copenhagen chemistry department who was the lead author of the paper on nano thermite stephen jones group had initiated and this story is getting major coverage in a european country none in the united states far secondly i symposium has just appeared in a major american social science journal called the american behavioral sciences it is now online this symposium is about what they call scads state crimes against democracy they beg the book begins by saying the symposium began by saying the silence of due diligence regarding the official account of the nine eleven incidents continued being ignored by scholars of policy and public administration this symposium also takes aim at the use of the term conspiracy theories to silence all criticisms about  crimes originating from people in high places and finally i'll talk more about it this afternoon at the luncheon but it talks about the incredible silence of the academy in response to what happened to professor steven jones of brigham university who was forced out of his position simply because he wrote a scientific paper that disagreed with the government's interpretation of the world trade center collapses normally this would cause an enormous ral within the academy they said aside from a peep from the a p there was virtual silence thank you very much where there pools of molten iron and or and or steel in the debris of the twin towers and building seven this section applies to both here we see pouring out of the south tower just minutes before it collapse molten metal by any standard the official story tells us that this must be molten lumen him from the melted airplane but multan aluminum looks like molten aluminum and silvery does not glow bright orange and yellow in daylight conditions must be molten iron or molten steel who says this as of twenty one days after the attack fires were still burning and molten steel was still running this is attributed to leslie robertson the structural engineer of the world trade center himself and his associate richard garlock who says the debris past the columns was red hot molten running saw pools of literally molten steel says the lead contractor the president of the company hydrocarbon burns only at about twelve maybe fourteen hundred degrees under ideal fuel air mixture ratios molten steel molten iron doesn't begin to even be produced until over twenty seven hundred degrees more than twice that temperature what could possibly account for these extreme hot temperatures we'll be looking at thermite a likely suspect which produces hot molten iron at twenty at forty five hundred degrees fahrenheit and you'll see what thermite is exactly it's used to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter do we have evidence though of thermite in the molten metal let's see what thermite is first thermite and incendiary used by the military their might is a compound of iron oxide in aluminum which when ignited sustains an extreme heat reaction creating molten iron in just two might can reach temperatures over forty five hundred degrees fahrenheit quite enough to liquify steel we know that open air fires cannot burn hot enough to melt steel but metal had melted at the base of the towers appendix c of the female report describes sulphur residues on the world trade center steel the new york times called this the deepest mystery of all well this is very interesting it turns out that there is chemical analysis done performed on this previously molten metal this junk for instance a piece of which was sent to dr stephen jones who we'll be hearing from shortly and he finds that this is predominantly iron so he rules out aluminum from the jet plane and it has abundant manganese so he rules out structural steel as a major component so it's not melted steel where does iron come from iron is a part of structural steel but it is but this is not that it came from some other source and it has manganese and flooring in abundance this is quite peculiar because meghan he says from the potassium laid throughout lower manhattan ninety thousand tons of concrete pulver rise to a fine powder laid in a blanket four to twelve inches thick here's some here it was sent to dr jones for separate samples in all of the dust samples not only the teams of scientists find these but r j lead an environmental consultant and u s g s find billions of these spheres well how did they get the and they're iron interestingly enough so they're previously molten well if there were thousands of cut or thermite cutter charges placed throughout the columns and beams under explosive conditions it would disperse that thermite not dissimilar from  spray out of a bottle where it's liquid as atomized it forms itself into a sphere by surface tension then it falls and cools and lands with all of the dust this is the only rational explanation for the billions of these sp s finds the spheres there iron r j lead finds them there iron they're about the width of a human hair very tiny spheres so dr jones concludes that given the trace metals mixed in here it's a significant evidence find any of that in the dust well we'd be looking for powders of aluminum iron oxide copper oxide and other materials and guess what he found it i'd like to introduce you to one of the chief scientists on the international team who continues his investigation into the world trade center dust dr steven jones emeritus professor of physics dr jones has published over fifty peer reviewed scientific papers in established journals including scientific american and nature his ph d research was conducted next stanford linear accelerator  action thank you richard these are photographs through a microscope of these amazing red great chips that we found in the world trade center dust we all saw that desk th in the dust there are large numbers of these chips that looked like this red material early on i thought that this might be paint chip so we'll talk about that in a moment we looked and analyzed very carefully for independently collected samples that chain of custody is very well established as described in our paper in addition to what is in our peer reviewed paper the chain of custody question we also have videotapes of the persons collecting this testifying how they collected it where they collected it when they collected it and how it came to the scientists on our team not just to me but to other scientists as well these chips are seen in all four of these samples and you see the pictures here from our paper we did a consistency check of course and  analyzed the elements present it's are actually a fairly simple structure in this red material but a very important structure is you look at the chemical signature which involves iron and oxygen as well as aluminum and carbon and noticed there well i don't know if there's no zinc in evidence that becomes important in a moment about this question and perhaps there is a pro explanation for these chips or perhaps it is just paint and in particular primer paint which was applied to the world trade center steel which has a red orange color similar to the color that we see here so we finally found a sample of the primer paint now as most of you know over ninety nine percent of the steel in the world trade center buildings was quickly shipped to asia and melted it was recycled this evidence from a crime scene was destroyed over the objection of many scientists and engineers and never s some of the steel has been preserved in memorials this particular room oriel it's at clarkson university in new york state the fellow that put the monument together for the university was kind enough to go to the monument and extract some of the paint off the surface so this is actual primer paint then from the world trade center and what we have is the analysis of the paint on the bottom plot and for comparison the analysis the chemical the elemental signature for the red chip material on the topline you can see that they are distinctly different the paint shows a very strong signal of zinc there is no zinc in the red chip material there are other differences that you can see the enormous in the paint for example now when we look at the red material this anomalous now we can call that anomalous because it doesn't behave like paint  certainly very distinct from the primer paint actually used in the world trade center so now we use scanning electron microscope to get this remarkable image that appears in our paper showing  faceted grains of iron oxide and aluminum in the plates if you look towards the center of this picture you can see both plates and these faceted grains and the  material it looks gray actually on this image from the electron microscope is an organic and you know i have people to say well maybe the buildings collapsed and then somehow you just form this nano thermite material well it turns out to be quite a bit more complicated than that because of the very ultra fine this is fifty thousand power we can finally see the plate like structures containing aluminum and the faceted grains that are also very tiny about one hundred nanometers across this is nano scale it's just hard to comprehend how difficult it is to reach that scale and notice the uniformity if you can see then in the  faceted iron oxide grains anyway then you've got the organic mix and my my reaction as soon as someone says well maybe the buildings just fell and you know you've got iron oxide which is rust i agree and aluminum in the buildings and they come together and form and to get it to react rapidly as as it does in this plot which is described in more detail in our paper the blue curve shows the reaction of the red material from the world trade center we did this with from all four samples of the blue this is one of the samples notice that it goes to high peak there in watts program the red peak is from known nano thermite this is from a paper published by lawrence livermore national laboratory this is a two thousand and one paper meaning that they had worked on this of course for years prior to this both of these curves show a very high energy lee release in short times and in fact the red material from the world trade center seven years later when we did the test reacts more rapidly than known nano  it's a very remarkable stuff in the words of my colleague dr fair it blows up and this is from the world trade center dust still blows up following the tests these ignition tests and the d s e we looked at the residue and we have served numerous iron rich spheres which richard talked about and so prevalent in the dust now these fears were not present in the red material prior to ignition but following ignition they are present this means it doesn't just suggest it means that there was there were very high temperatures present and furthermore we find iron oxide before hand all show you did on that in a moment and we find elemental iron that is not enough oxygen to produce iron oxide after ignition that means the iron is reduced in kemah chemical terms which means there was a thermite reaction i know of no other way to reduce the iron and produce these figures from this material as we have observed and published in a peer reviewed paper this is our paper herit is the first author and he's doing a wonderful job of spreading the information about the science this is a peer reviewed paper in an established scientific journal i want to emphasize that this paper has not yet been challenged in the literature the peer reviewed literature in the protocol of science the established protocol we have published our findings it took months to get this through pe say but it has been published and as david griffin pointed out it's seeing a great deal of attention in europe we're hoping beginning with this conference will get some attention in the media in the united states thank you now all of this evidence together points toward explosive destruction now interestingly enough fire can't account for any one of these ten key characteristics let alone all ten of them not only that we have fema documenting in the appendix c of their b pat report in may of two thousand and two the melting of steel again fires can't melt steel turning a solid girder into swiss cheese like this piece here interestingly enough this is only one of two pieces of steel that were saved from the forty thousand tons of steel in world trade center seven it was all the rest of it was removed illegally the destruction of evidence before the report came out saying hey we don't know how this building came down our best hypothesis fire has only a low probability of occurrence let's look at the steel and see what happened but it was all shipped to china by that time expert corroboration well here's one of many a danny joint top european controlled demolitions expert twenty seven years he says it starts from below they've simply blown away the columns it's a controlled demolition a team of experts did this it's professional work without a doubt and we have four knowledge of the destruction plenty and you'll see it in your d v d but here's a sneak preview listen to these mysterious construction workers coming down the buildings about to blow up how do they know that these eight to ten small fires are about to blow up the building what's going on here all of this direct evidence along with the data from the femur reports of whistleblowers which you'll hear about in the d v d the expert corroboration for knowledge of destruction this is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of explosive controlled demolition i'm going to show you now the problems associated with the twin towers because as clear as that evidence is for world trade center building seven the twin towers have even a far greater clarity in the evidence associated beginning with is there a sudden onset of destruction not at the base but at the point of jet plane impacts after all let's realize now we're looking at deceptive controlled demolitions we want to blame the collapse of this building on the fires and the planes were going to start these explosions in this case at the point of jet plane impacts where upon we hear and we will hear several examples dozens and dozens and dozens in the d v d of sounds and flashes of explosions h and seen by witnesses like these one hundred of them recorded in october after nine eleven but we didn't know about this until august of two thousand and five why the city was holding this information finally the new york court state of appeals required them to turn it over to the new york times what are these guys saying one hundred of the over one hundred actually shook my bones shortly before the first tower came down i remember feeling the ground shaking heard a terrible noise and then debris just started flying everywhere somewhere around the middle of the world trade center there was this orange and red flash coming out initially just one flash and then a cup popping all the way around the building the building it started to explode well let's see what they might be talking about as we see a known control demolition on the left and the north tower on the right is there any similarity in the upper part of the north tower to a known controlled dome demolition enough to warrant an investigation into the possible use of explosives perhaps that's when i saw the building coming down pop up up i heard that frigging noise saw a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors ten and fifteen you actually heard the pops in you heard the pops of the building each popping sound initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would go around the building and all four sides let's look at the south tower see if there's any similarity to a known controlled demolition occurring on the left where the initial demolition sequence is occurring in the middle of the building they don't always have to start at the bottom i saw a flash flash flash then it looked like the building came down but the terrorist planted explosives somewhere in the building that's how loud it was a crackling explosive let's listen to these gentlemen at this time i would like to introduce to you a very special gentleman and friend of mine a firefighter paramedic of twenty two years and founder of firefighters for nine eleven truth claiming no one hundred sixteen firefighters on the petition mr eric lawyer thank you very much and like richard said my name is eric lawyer and i founded the firefighters and i live in truth after i watch richard and one of his presentations and i realized that something more had to be done and i just want to thank richard for everything he's doing here and the firefighters trying to live in truth strongly support richard gage and all the architects and engineers that have the courage to sign that petition and i know from personal experience there's about five times as many out there that believe what we believe but don't have the courage to sign it so i'm hoping today is that people will find the courage after listening to this presentation and seeing everybody here and seeing that we are behind it we also demand an investigation that follows the national standards and has contempt and subpoena powers nine eleven was the greatest loss of life and property damage in u s fire history this should have been the most protected preserved over tested and thorough investigation of a crime scene in world history sadly it was not what was it well we know from their own admission the majority of the evidence was destroyed i like richard said twenty two years of experience i've seen a lot of crime scenes i've never seen anything like this in my life i was ice was out of the sight i saw trucks leaving faster than you know anywhere i've ever seen but i accepted it at the time and for years i accepted it because it was a recovery and rescue operation and that's normal to have something like that going again we never see anything like it but that was expected what i didn't know for years what was going on behind the scenes was that evidence was being destroyed when it was shipped off by their own admission tower seven investigation this investigation into our seven had no physical evidence how do you investigate a crime when you've destroyed all the evidence it doesn't make sense they also admit that they refused to test the explosives or to test for explosives or or residue of thermite now this is what i'm going to go into here just real quickly is there are national standards for an investigation that's what all of us are asking for an investigation that follows national standards and holds people accountable this man right here just so you can see it is what we call than the kind of the fire investigation want to one this is the most basic fire investigation manual there this is for the two thousand want to dish and this is what should have been referred to at least it doesn't have to be followed exactly but it should have been used as a guideline for the investigation i'm just going to cover a few of the things that are in here  violated and the initial investigators that did not protect the scene violated the most basic of the guidelines and i'm going to cover five of them here one is the n f p a nine point three point six it covers spoil ation of evidence what specifically what it reads is once evidence has been removed from the scene it should be maintained and not destroyed or altered until the investigation is complete the steel was melted down prior to the investigation and we know that from their own admission one thousand point two point four exotic excel aren't if the if you're on the scene you find melted steel concrete you should consider the use of exotic accelerants and they specifically say in the manual thermite mixtures produce exceedingly hot fires that can account for melted steel and concrete that also says they leave residues that will can be tested for visually and chemically identifiable and again they did not test for it and just put in perspective on a routine house fire if we suspect even the slightest use of an accelerant we're going to test for it when there's no fatalities when there's very little property damage so did not do it on this there is absolutely no excuse i can't drive that point home i'm not eighteen point fifteen is analyze fuel source all available for use fuel sources should be considered in eliminated until one fuel can be identified as meeting all the physical damage criteria for example if you find create if you find pulverized concrete which we all know there was in all three buildings or is pulverized concrete the only fuels that can create seeded explosions should be considered so they shouldn't be considering fires they shouldn't be doing that it doesn't account for pulverized concrete they should only be considering exotic acts and explosives nineteen point four point eight point two point six extremism the terrorist may include fire is but one of a variety of weapons along with explosives used in furthering his or her goal we know they used them in ninety three why would we not test for him now there was reports that day multiple reports which will get into our second so they could have put them in the basement how do we know that unless we test for it i mean even if it is the terrorists that they claim they are we need to test this fourteen point three preservation of the fire scene and physical evidence we find the following the cause of a fire or explosion is not known until the night near the end of the investigation the entire fire scene should be considered physical evidence and should be protected and preserve it's just over and over there are so many you can go to our website the firefighters truth we have many more of these actual chapters that cover what they should have done that they did not do so now by their own admission in all three building collapses nist refused to test for it to physically test dr steven jones did for explosives this is this is just unbelievable in here their excuses and i quote it is unlikely that one hundred pounds of thermite or more could have been carried in the world trade center seven and placed around columns without being detected either prior to september eleventh or during that day so again i've been on a lot of fire scenes and i've seen a lot of investigations and why would we not test because something's hard to do that's the exact reason you need to investigate if that was hard to do we need to find out how they did and number two missed excuse in addition no blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of the video recordings during the collapse of world trade center seven or reported by witnesses that's one of the excuses why they didn't test well apparently they didn't reach operate teen eighteen is the general definition of explosions although an explosion is almost always accompanied by the production of a loud noise the noise itself is not and big bold letters an essential element in the definition of an explosion the generation and violent escape of gases of the primary criteria of an explosion so that alone says they should have tested for it but then we also they they've missed as lied and we can prove it it was seen as the new investigation happens to you going to the evidence is out there for you to see right now we have one hundred first responders who reported explosions we have the radio transmissions from f t and why members that are still recorded today that reported explosions we have audio recordings we have video recordings i have personally talked to witnesses that heard them so there is nothing short of saying bay lied and we need when they need to be held accountable and besides that the well that and like i said there is no excuse for not testing for explosives and so at the very least at the very best even if you want to believe the official story this was the most incompetent investigation of all time and i've talked to a lot of investigators that were there and i asked them the specific question why did they refuse to test they weren't the ones who refused but missed it and they said all we can say you know all they can answer is incompetence or they tell me to shut up they cannot give me any definite any reason that follows national standards so but the reality after you know all the research everybody here in these incredible people were in the room with today have done there the reality is it was a criminal investigation to cover up the crime so i'd like just to finish just to finish up i like to read a quote this is from a retired decorated afghan war lieutenant you want to know the fire service he is a stud he worked on a lot of company twenty six rescue company three rescue company one in his career any one of those those are amazing companies here's his comment trade tower seven by itself is the smoking gun not hit by an aircraft with only a few relatively small fires that came down in the classic crimp an implosion something only very precise demolitions can accomplish what it takes days if not weeks to prepare the nine eleven commission didn't even mention it and fema actually stated they didn't know why it collapsed and left at that brothers i know what implications i know that the above implications are hard almost unthinkable but the official explanation is utter nonsense and three hundred forty three of our murder brothers are crying out for justice mr eric a lawyer firefighters for nine eleven truth look at the volcanic eruption in the tongan sea with symmetry upward outward arching streamers pyro plastic like clouds of dust compare these known explosions on the right to the developments of the collapse of the north tower is there any similarity is there enough similarity to warrant a new investigation into the possible use of explosives look at the north tower as it develops its descent we see two explosions up at the top immediately and then we see the telescoping of the north tower does the destruction of the upper fifteen stories before there is any crushing of the lower story lower block by that upper block look again and belts of explosions like the firemen described wrapping all the way around the building in tremendous display of pyro plastic like dust a look again as we stop and start on the north tower like the firemen said belts of explosions symmetry even lines asymmetry from fires and asymmetry from jet plane impacts do not produce symmetry like engineered destruction take a look from below the canopy of destruction we have a series of very violent explosions as we'll zoom in here underneath not to mention the lateral distribution of debris take a look now violent explosions here here here isolated a junction of pulverized the building materials look down here racing down the corner of the building as fast almost as the debris falling alongside this is almost freefall acceleration it turns out to be two thirds of freefall acceleration this is anything but a gravitational collapse mechanism do we have a straight down symmetrical progression outside the footprint fema shows us a twelve hundred foot diameter of debris almost equally displaced outside the footprint of the building well beyond the boundaries of ground zero here's building seven a nice neat implosion classic controlled demolition here's the very explosive event known as the destruction of the twin towers take a look at these polls arised building materials which we're told by nist are puff being produced by this pile driver well first of all there is no pile driver it's destroyed itself in the first four seconds these are not puffs of air they're polled for eyes building materials you ject it at one hundred sixty to two hundred feet per second these  explosive speeds and they're twenty forty and even sixty stories down below and they are extremely precise at the midpoint between the corners of the buildings do we have a near freefall pace through the path of greatest resistance indeed it turns out to be two thirds of freefall there is no jolt this building does not stop while it's crushing thousands of tons of steel underneath it starts immediately suddenly smoothly and without interruption straight down this indicates that there is no resistance or extremely little resistance from the structure below do we have a total dismemberment of the steel structure well watch as the south tower is destroying itself and disappearing into this cloud what we would expect is this tilting mass to fall in some mangled heap down at the bottom of the ground and yet it disappears into this dust cloud it twenty two degrees it's off center of the building below how can it crush the building below at any rate when it is falling off and continuing its angular momentum theoretically we have a symmetrical damage from the airplanes  symmetrical damage from the fires and asymmetrical loading from the building above watch what's happening below complete symmetrical destruction like the firemen described bands of explosions pop pop pop all the way down the building at two thirds of freefall speed and an equal distribution of debris where the steel frame skeleton is almost completely broken up how about the laterally junction of steel nine t perimeter wall units most of them ejected fifty to seventy miles an hour outside of the perimeter walls landing up to six hundred feet away this requires an enormous amount of energy how about the floors we one hundred ten floors in each of these twin towers each and acre in size four and five inch thick concrete laid over twenty two gauge metal decking how many of these floors do we find at the bottom of this gravitational collapse not one the debris shows only core columns perimeter columns aluminum cladding where do the pancakes go in this pancaking collapse we're looking for pancakes like these and a traditional pancake and collapse do we have enormous clouds of pirate plastic concrete well where did the concrete go all we see in the remains is dust and steel direct evidence of explosive destruction again a fire can't create any one of the characteristics and how about that nist report we were told that this is the answer to the for two thousand and five if there's to how the twin towers collapsed but the entire twenty million dollar three year effort by nist stops at the initiation of collapse i am not kidding you there are objective it doesn't actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached why not structural engineers do this for a living calculate the ability of the structure below to resist any impacting mass from above had they gone any farther in their analysis they would have had have account accounted for all of the evidence for explosive controlled demolition that begins at that point they had to stop there they had no choice what do they call this the final report on the collapse of the world trade center twin towers there is no analysis on the collapse whatsoever it is a complete potemkin village designed to explain something that it doesn't even begin to do and they acknowledge that in our request for a correction they acknowledge we are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse of this building they have one half page which speculates that at that after the initiation of collapse what we have is global collapse in suing well the video showed that the centrally came down at freefall acceleration they acknowledged the two interesting prompting their own chief science division judge james quinn tear down to look at real alternatives that might have been the cause of the collapse of the twin towers we have expert corroboration plenty here's william rice who states as many of our thirty structural engineers with architects and engineers for nine eleven truth state the prevailing theory would have us believe that each of the twin towers inexplicably collapsed upon itself crushing all two hundred eighty seven massive columns on each floor while maintaining a near free fall acceleration as if one hundred thousand or more tons of supporting structural steel framework underneath didn't exist i would submit that even create one of these let alone all ten um along with additional testimony which you'll see in the d v d whistleblowers expert corroboration for knowledge also with the twin towers this is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of destruction by explosive controlled demolition so we have some very serious problems with nist in fact let's summarize our chief concerns about the  reports nist lied about the severity of fire severity and duration in all three skyscrapers nist lied about the evidence of molten iron and steel in the rubble nist refused to test for explosives when explosive demolition was the most fema would not follow the n f p a guidelines for fire an explosion investigation looking for explosives in the residue missed will not release the computer model in input data claiming that its release would jeopardize public safety appendix c documentation and photos of melted steel beams mists animated computer model bears no resemblance to the actual collapse as seen in the videos of world trade center seven in the twin towers nist claims that the upper block above the point of jet plane impacts of each of the twin towers crushed the lower block but video analysis reveals clearly that the upper block disintegrated in waves of explosions prior to any crushing of the lower block nist technical analysis into the twin towers collapse stops at initiation of collapse nist acknowledges in its response to our request for correction that there unevil to provide a full explanation or any explanation really nist tests the steel assemblies of the twin towers in a two hour two thousand degree fire test and they sagged only four inches but missed tossed out this experimental data claiming a forty two inch say mists own metal a graphic paint analysis indicates fire temperatures of only up to six hundred degrees fahrenheit and yet they claim temperatures of over eighteen hundred degrees fahrenheit in short this official technical explanation is fraudulent and inconsistent with the basic laws of physics by contrast the hypothesis of controlled demolition is consistent with all of the available forensic evidence since the official fema and nist reports provide insufficient contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the towers destruction and since we have already filed complaints in two thousand and nine to the office of the inspector general who oversees the department of commerce who oversees mist and we've received no redress we are now calling upon the attorney general eric holder the united states to impanel a federal grand jury investigation of the individuals responsible at nist including lead investigator sunder and co project leader john gross