the today is monday the twenty fourth of june july and i'm pablo mess with the political action committee and roof and we are being brought to you by general welfare present we are at a point right now where it's becoming outlived that any other idea of doing anything economically in the united states is not under the current system situation possible the infrastructure projects that trump has been talking about are not possible the everything is going to bail out the banks everything we have a infrastructure crisis in new york which is going to intensify after september and you have a blame game going on between the governor and the mayor over the off and there's aspects of that all over the country meanwhile the population is wondering when when when when is you know things going to kick in of you know when i can get a job or are  federal reserve chairman janet yellen says we're not going to have another crisis like two thousand server two thousand and eight that's that's that's federal reserve speak with saying yes we're poor about to have another crisis like two thousand and seven thousand because why would you want to say they're not going to have another another crisis if they weren't going to how another crisis they would say that they would say anything but is she saying we're skated we're not going to have it that means we're going to have it otherwise she would say and this is the situation with italy the italian banking system is no longer under its bankrupt and the amount of funds required to recapitalize the banking system is beyond the means of the time people to squeeze out of the italian people so a lot of people are taking it in the shorts there's a there's a kind of very complicated bailing going on and the experts are saying that the only way italy can deal with the crisis is to leave the euro go back to their own currency and implement glass steagall type measures of separating the dealing with the banks by my feet by reorganizing and finding out what the bad debt is and what the good stuff is and keep keeping that positive insured and so on and so forth but they can't do that under the european union they can't do that under the in the in the current situation so you have so you have decent you ations developing the population of the united states isn't falling for all the crap in the media about trump and about russia russia russia russia finally you know they're going to do want to help america right and so they have a number of things that they were promoting some of which were already in the in the trump playbook like a premise program and  tax tax credits for businesses to employ people in manufacturing and training them so for the song but they are nonetheless they they didn't go to where they had to go they didn't discuss glass steagall they didn't discuss how they were going to come up with the money for all of this but they're not going to have the money the money isn't there it's all going to bail out the banks so so what happened is that i believe was the first question or so i need a gallagher of our movement got lucia's for losses to going to have to be implemented and and and and there's a fundamental problem because these people don't understand why you have to implement a four loss to glass steagall being the first creating the i stand the nature of the physical economy the nature of the economies relationship to science to the development of the cognitive powers of the population the relationship of the optimism of development has on the population they don't have any  only dark and so on the understanding it understanding the deeper aspects of it so what i'm going to go through now is the deeper aspects of why all roads lead to the fo laws of linnen economic laws of the roof and and now first and foremost the the four laws represent a battle over the self identity of the human race of the people of our nation what is their saw fidelity are they slaves to wall street are of are they going to allow are or are they just are we a nation or are we just basically a link alluding to ground for the for the financial criminal financial system so it's a question of your identity or you want to or you are american or you're just a a peon on in the financial system where you're losing your wages you're losing you know you're losing ground you're losing your morale you know you're being addicted theological involved and the reason is philosophical and theological won't get into but it has to do with the discoveries of science and physical economics that  in the in the early fifty's now so so i'll start with the theological and philosophical issues so first i start with the theological and philosophical issues now up until the late seventies late seven hundred there was no such thing as science separated from philosophy or from theology it was believed regardless of your position on any of the areas or issues of being discussed that the  areas were not divorced if the universe has a creator and it is true there must be a coherent expression in the physical world that can be understood by human beings because human beings have that capacity in other words the creator did not create a chaotic on and on understandable universe why would we create why would you have a creator if you didn't do if you did if you just had chaos you know i mean it doesn't make any sense so so science which is not ask these theological questions well how would the creator have done it it is a science devoid of theology and unless you want to prove to science that there is no god essentially you're divorced from theology you're you you say well those questions have nothing to do with science well you can't experimentally demonstrate the creator created the universe ok but you have to ask yourself if there is a creator how would a creat have arranged it it's such a way that it that it's and it's based on a least action principle it's efficient and it's physics there's a physical cause ality in the system and like like an example of this w e did not fall on the physical center of the earth of the physical center of the sun it fell upon a point in imaginary point in space and kepler said that god would not set up a solar system who center is an imaginary point ok for him because how would all the bodies that are that are revolving around it imagine a point no where the imaginary point would be and so it's from the standpoint of saying got no the sun has to be the center of the solar system and the planets revolve around the sun and they're there they're revolving around the sun you have to discover the laws that govern those planets revolving around the sun and dots the beginning of one of the most profound breakthroughs in science but it did in the people from a rational standpoint and the same with einstein i thought was operating on the same basis he was in trying to imagine how god would how the speed of light would work he was imagin being traveling at the speed of light he was imagining what the world would look like if if the speed of light were not constant and he was imagining what the world would look like if the speed of light was constant he came to the conclusion that the speed of light had to be constant everywhere no matter what the velocity is that was going on the speed of light is always constant at will no matter what whether your planet is moving this way or moving that way or moving any which way in regard to any other had to be constant because the because light is the basis of communication and the order of events would be chaotic right if if if because he had a conception that the universe had to make sense and that the universe could not be arbitrary could not be passed to be a reasonable has to be based on reason and whether you believe in god or not the point that that's not the point the point is that that isn't just a coherence now so so now whether you believe that human beings were born similarly ok in philosophy especially the philosophy of how many human beings know what they know you have you always have had to  split whether you believe that human beings were born with a blank slate and through the senses you acquire knowledge or whether you believe that human beings have preexisting concepts that are th apply to experience generally in both cases you have a sense that reason the power of human beings to understand the world and act on the world exists now between these two but he is the most important philosopher not only at the end of the seventeen hundreds but he she he he shaped the future of philosophy from then on emanuel congress developed a philosophical typically depend on experience and they cannot exist without the influence of experience and the senses depend on this concept the searches cannot be knock you cannot order you cannot  then he did in his critique of pure reason is assert from that standpoint that the mind can only know what it knows based on preexisting concepts activated by what but by sense experience and that and that thus the world is that people know and they don't and there's the world that if there's anything outside of that they can't know if it's not a preexisting concept in your mind and if it's not experience categories we have ten categories then you have no way of knowing and he called up that which you can know phenomena and he called reality which is you can which you can't know newman and thus the real world cannot really be and what distaso is you have these things that you can't really know what can't you know you can know god exists right that's not part of that structure so that's something you believe right but you can't know the cot exists there's no way for you to know that god exists because you're trapped in it and this in this sense in the senses so basically through through him religion and theology or especially god is off the hook because it is no longer subject to science right you can't know but on the other hand science is no longer accountable to philosophy and theology either so you can so you're left with just an experimental observational science but you can't make metaphysical or philosophical statements about the universe as a critique of the observational science because that's not scientific so you ended up having to humanities being totally divorced from the natural sciences so you have a natural sciences and you have humanities there's no relationship to to to discoveries made in classical music for instance by by beethoven brahms with signs there's no there's no connection there and later discrete to the extremes of the current post modernist current which includes the likes of  earlier fascism of the twentieth century and the curve fascism of the more post modernist we are dealing with today and so why am i bringing this up because until the roof came along this continent originated strain of philosophy has dominated modern thought and divorced the philosophical world scientists and contour is that the universe is organized by principles that are knowable and that discoveries like the ones kepler and i stay made when applied to economics and culture change the nature of the universe change the nature of man's activity change the nature of of the economy changes the nature of the earth therefore mankind can know what can cause the  through discoveries and when those discoveries apply in the physical world change the physical world then you are discovering how the world really is outside your categories and your experience and you demonstrate that you know it by the change in the physical world by the increase in the relative potential population density on the planet which is a change in the physical relationship from man to the world that's how you know you know that's how but you didn't know that that the did not dos scientific that scientific knowledge did not come from your cat from your senses or from the categories you brought to your senses it came through the imagination and and hype the ability to hypothesize what you cannot know and then make discover therefore mike mccurry can know reality as it really is but not all of reality as it really is but the part of reality that you need to know to further economically develop to further develop your mastery of of the univers e so this is the key aspect of what human beings really are this is what what it means to be in the theological sense created any into the creator because the creator who created the universe and man is a creator who is at discovering the way the universe was created and is using that those discoveries to expand continue the creation want most of all to justify their arbitrary power they want to escape being accountable to any lawfulness and most of all they want to assert that humans have no basis for knowing truth or reason now in traditional religions and cultures that are based upon a monotheistic orientation like judaism islam and christianity or a full sophocles tradition son and in china confucianis m you have these conceptions and however when the when the british east india company was taking over the british empire of creating the british empire they commissioned a historian by the name given to do an exhaustive study of the rise and fall of rome and empire in his conclusion was that what brought round down was that it was being challenged by christianity and was being challenged by the by the concept of man in god's image by the concept of a unitary creator and humans can reason and this is the basis for morality and the romans didn't like that and and his thesis is that that's what brought down the roman empire so if you want to build a modern empire you have to be able to to to destroy or prevent christianity from doing that to two it now showing judaism in and profusion of you have similar concepts but this is not to say that traditional societies based in part on these four four examples do not have issues of corruption and fixed order and  conception has taken a profound beating in the last two years because they because this conception of what is being human because of the divorce between from science was  mainly you mainly you're right you're right your ideas of theology religion and philosophy were reduced to belief so this is one of the reasons you have so many charismatic and times religious because it's about my belief it's about my relationship to jesus  my personal beliefs it just and they are true because i say they're true because i say that i believe but that's not so that's not science right that's not science but but science is not about that you know so so that's why you have this disconnect between science and religion but lucia's concept of physical economics as proof of that of man being created in the image of the creator as being expressed in scientific and technological progress has begun to spark a revival within formally traditional cultures and religions not a fear of progress as normally would be a fear of science a fear of progress but beginning to embrace progress not as an evil but as the essence of the affirmation of man's true nature and i guess you see this in trying to where we have an idea of trying civilization a renaissance based on reason now taking place in china confucianism is coming back but with the scientific and technological component as the basis we see it in russia where the russian orthodox church hasn't braced scientific and technological progress with orthodox characteristics as a sacred and glorious gift of god to humanity when i say all roads lead to for laws as the final product practical expression of man's true nature at the level of society economy this is what i'm talking about and you implement to form laws and you transform the identity of the population because you're demonstrating that humanity can can alter the future can alter can can can alter and change in the nature of the solar system and the galaxy later on and so forth so that's the battle we are in and i don't have time to go into all of the particulars a sho