s determine history not events a lot of people look at history as a series of events no there's guiding intentions that are causing those events to occur or not occur and if you do not look at history from the standpoint of the intentions of those who are creating history then you are you can read every book on history in the world and wouldn't know anything so i'm going to start with the fifty year history of the intention of land in the room and this intention begin somewhere in the middle in one nine hundred sixty s when it comes from a conception in economics that lucia developed through it through breakthroughs in understanding economics as a science as a physical s descent tension starting in the sixty's middle sixty sixty five roughly sixty four sixty five sixty six is when lucian tended to begin to create a movement up to that point up to the time he was forty three years old forty four years old but it was never his intention to create a movement because he was always active around other networks around to to to to try to get ideas into other other other groups and other networks it never would have behoove them to create a movement except for what i'm going to say now now to quote an interview recently with joseph or colorado in the san francisco review of books makes the following comment all successful economies deep pan and suspect proceeding the depletion of what existed in the past by progress into urgently needed future replacements with better methods have a rate of attrition in their activity and unless that rate of attrition is superceded with an increase in the productive capability that society that economy must either slowly or more rapidly die that's a fundamental law now one could forestall that death by going into your neighbor and raping and pillaging your neighbor that might force stop that debt and you might for stolid by expanding that process to include  and other nations but you can never escape this inevitable law the law of attrition which can only be superceded mine increase in technology and the science and the knowledge and population and the skill levels of the population so on and so forth that's a fundamental law that is not an opinion that is not a point of view or you have your point of view oh how interesting know that is a law in any society that does not adhere to that law must either collapse or start losing their neighbors and that's the way it works that's history that's what governments history and his intention fifty years ago by forecasting disarray ality onto the policies that were emerging in that period center around the discussions in economics and then in science that were going on in the lead layers of that period he recognized that the direction y would be not to develop but to loot and plunder and that this would just would destroy humanity he he saw the economic thinking mainly at that time something called monitors would not allow for dealing with this problem attrition and worse and he saw that period the emergence he also saw emerging around the anti war movement and beginning in the middle sixty's he saw the seeds of the sex drug counterculture revolution  precipitate the crimes of individuals who later would lead the world to fascism assaults on industry and the working population because of the rejection of any lawful consequence to the effect on the world and posterity by their policies and actions so from doc time roughly fifty years ago lyndon la rouche has had a coherent intention to resist this and prepare an alternative i am part of that intention i emerged as part of that attention in the night early seventy's and have been part of that intention now for forty three years and says for roughly forty three years ago i have been every waking day in a it's not an emergency mobilization to keep the fight going for replacing the system was one that can deal with the question of attrition that can actually be survivable for not only the united states but the survival for the force for humanity as a whole now that is the economic aspect of the new paradigm of our of our movement and this the new paradigm which is emerging with china and russia and other nations and so however when i reflect on the past these conceptions like the one on the tradition and economics did not exist in one nine hundred sixty five or ninety sixty six or even later it did not exist in the west which was dominated by monitress economic theory nor the soul union or communist china in economics and culture neither one of them represented had a conception of this issue of attrition and the issues that you had to to have a solution to that by development and marxist ideology there is no way to resolve this question that is a fundamental flaw of marxism is he does not have a way to resolve the question of attrition through expanding reproduction using a marxist term and that is where all of the problems of the soviet union and and and and and to a lesser degree china before they changed were slow kate and there the attention now to the opposite intention it has existed and this trans atlantic empire which is as lavrov said i to munich security conference a few days last week he said it is this thing has reached this and it can't go any further and empires generally of all forms up try to avoid the consequences for themselves of the effects of having to  long as i said earlier they want to avoid the consequences of having to raise the quality of labor and intelligence and science and technology needed to overcome attrition they would rather not make that kind of effort because there by so raising the population to a higher level out of necessity they have to deal to not develop but loot and whether it's squeezing the population looting other nations cannibalizing past economic development not only expendable but you want to use them up in the process of looting so over time increasing improve postpone the inevitable reality that they cannot overcome attrition to empire and so in this context of the russia's intention governing the movement and radiating outwards there have there also coinciding with lucia's intention there is also intentions in other areas china the compa of the communist party that emerged after the cultural revolution with the chinese people is not fully appreciated by the people by people here they have a compact with the population that they have to deliver progress they have to deliver an improvement in the life of the people or else they will lose the ability to govern or exist that is the agreement that is implicit in in china democracy  you know the right of dissent public dissent all of that is secondary the communist party has to deliver economic development or else they cease to exist the chinese population will not accept their r so this is a very powerful incentive it in and in china too to overcome the question of attrition in russia the collapse of the soviet union and massive attrition  that collapse cost and the realization of turning it around in the context of a post communist form of secular traditional orthodox christian culture in other words they abandoned communism but dave now have rejected western financial capitalism they're going with a more traditional orthodox christian culture based on the the idea of  uing the nation from disability and developing the nation developing the productive powers of the nation and india there's a parallel as well in the united states trust campaign promises were of this type promises they made in this campaign the promises he made in his campaign to make america great again to bring industry back to create productive activity in the country and he he has to deliver because he won the election on that he didn't win the election because the russians helped him win the election the russians in the help win the elections he won the elections because he promised he made a promise to the people just you elect me and this is what i'm going to do and tonight he gave his state of the union where he's saying he intends to deliver he cannot deliver if he doesn't deliver if he doesn't deliver some tangible promises that he made during his campaign he will not exist either it's not a game and if trump is playing a game he's going to be gone very soon because this is not a game you either do it or you don't and because you have to do it you have to deal with the mess that's been created and how's he going to deal with the mess this being created is the question and alternately not going to be able to deal with it unless you adopt a policy of overcoming attrition either through working with china working with other nations or dramatically changing to be orientation in nature of the u s economy he can't do it any other way sustained and increasing the development of manufacturers and industry of the more advanced technology and going for breakthrough of fusion and and and and and and space program which already there's an indication that he might be moving in that direction cultural or psychological warfare against the population an example of that it may seem benign but it's not going to go to school children come home and you know these are these are these are junior high school kids maybe even grade school kids i don't know you don't do that to children you don't put those kind of questions before them and expect that oh you have a choice you don't do that to a child you know and you have massive drug addiction massive drug trafficking the and you have george soros involved and you have you have financial operations being run against nations you have color revolutions like what happened in ukraine and what was attempted in syria and libya and many other places you have wars religious wars being promoted you have u governance and conflict resolution apparatus to foment ethnic strife in every country where there's a large ethnic divisions like china and india and indonesia and malaysia and and you know you name it and most of mostly not true now if things are going to get your food on the table none of us things are going to overcome the rate of attrition of the of the of the economy none of those things are going to provide jobs for people so that they can actually support a family none of these things deliver to the people of the united states anything so why are these issues so important while these issues the most those people identifying with those narratives do they care about what happens to the coal miners and west virginia do they care about what happens to the workers in that lost their jobs do they care they don't even not they don't even have a it's not that they don't care stay down even know that that reality exists nations that don't know that that reality exists of overcoming the tradition will not survive and cannot survive because they are violating the fundamental laws of economics and society had loose and were loose of the financial times washington bureau saying that trump is on reformable and he has to be removed within the next few months or else the system is finished what system are they talking about the  transatlantic system that's what you're talking about so trump is in the way why because he doesn't he doesn't have the underlying orientation that he oligarchies hats he may have other problems he may be a disaster in the making but he doesn't have that underlying orientation so he has to go he cannot be allowed to be president if the system is going to survive if that system is going to survive well that system is not going to survive the financial issue is very key what's going on is that if the plug on the financial system were to be pulled today and the banking collapse occurred on a global scale which it could happen any he adopting the four loss now because he doesn't see a political the political potential to do so probably but if you put a person like that in a crisis you put the nation in a crisis the presidency kicks it this is not george bush or obama this is trump what's he going to do can they trust that he won't in a crisis say ok we're going to do this and ram through grass table and ram through a credit system and reorganize the banks  and and crush forever wall street in the city of london what guarantee do you have they won't do that in a crisis so therefore you better not pull the plug on the system but eventually the system got to the financial it's there and we want to make sure that every state legislator every congressman everybody every for every policy person knows this is an option and this is necessary so tonight donald trump did it stated the union and this is going to freak a lot of people out because he didn't fumble he didn't sound like an idiot and he was quite poetic at the end in terms of the future and the most important thing he probably said was that you know i'm not the president of the world i'm just the president of united states and i'm not here to tell the rest of the world what to do you know i'm here to work with the rest of the world in mutual areas of interest so they can benefit us and them so this is big this is this is huge and we're looking at probably an escalation of an all out assault on trump because he did he did he did quite well he did consolidate support from within the republicans and other layers he did consolidate his position with this tonight i do believe so there but that doesn't mean these people give up it's it's it's an all out war and so so so that projects that our mobil is centered around the most important thing besides glass steagall and before a loss is to to get the full story of what happened in ukraine in the hands of the population in the hands of all of the policy people and the congress and that's what we've been doing we just put out a dossier on the ukraine situation which is being circling me on thursday we had a day of action last thursday on it and so we're going to be mobilizing on that to break the news in the environment on what's going on in in ukraine because that situation is still unfolding it's getting much worse for the radical elements in ukraine have dems have destroyed to be economic economic connections exist between the donnish republics and tomorrow morning essentially the donna's republic will will become fully independent from not just  in temporarily but permanently so this is a very dangerous situation ukraine situation and most people don't realize that that how it came to be and if they did they would be more open to s