joking i'd like to address three areas and i'd like to start with the topic you were just discussing the topic of drones in your response to senator paul yesterday you suggested there may well be circumstances in which it is permissible to use drones to target a u s citizen on u s soil i'd like to explore those sort of those circumstances in particular you pointed to two you pointed to pearl harbor and nine eleven both of which were extreme military attacks on the homeland i want to ask a more specific question if an individual is sitting quietly at a cafe in the united states in your legal judgment does the constitution allow a u s citizen on u s soil to be killed by a drone for sitting in a cafe and having a cup of coffee if that individual is not posing an imminent and immediate threat of death or bodily harm does the constitution allow a drone to kill that individual on the basis of what you said i don't think you can arrest them purpose the person is suspected to be a terrorist you have abundant evidence he's a terrorist he's involved in terrorist plots but at the moment look at us he's not pointing a visit at the pentagon he is sitting in a cafe overseas the united states government uses drones to take out individuals when they're walking down a path when they're sitting in a cafe if they're if the if that we typically deal with a situation like that it would be respect at general holder but my question wasn't about appropriateness or or prosecutorial discretion it was a simple legal question does the constitution allow a u citizen on u s soil who doesn't pose an imminent threat to be killed by the u s government i do not believe again you have to look at all of the facts but on the facts that you've given me this is a hypothetical i would not think that in th situation the use of a drone or lethal force would be appropriate because we have to hold it i have to tell you i find it remarkable that in that hypothetical which is deliberately very simple you are unable to give a simple one word one syllable answer no i think it is unequivocal that if the u s government were to use it around to take the life of a u s citizen on u s soil and that individual did not pose an imminent threat propriety my question is about whether something is constitutional or not as attorney general you are the chief legal officer of the united states do you have a legal judgment on whether it would be constitutional to kill a s citizen on u s soil in those circumstances a person who is not in here as you describe this in the public hypotheticals but as the part of the way in which you have described if this person sitting at the cafe not doing anything imminently the use of lethal force would not be appropriate would not be something i wanted it remarkable that you still will not give an opinion on the constitutionality let me move on to the next topic because we trace let me go round and round let me be clear translate my appropriate to no i thought i was saying no right no but then i am glad after after much gymnastics i am very glad to hear that it is the opinion of the department of justice that it would be unconstitutional to kill a u s citizen on u s soil if that individual did not pose an imminent threat that statement has not been easily forthcoming i wish you had given that statement in response to senator paul's letter asking you it and i will point out that this week i will be introducing legislation in the senate to make clear that the u government cannot kill a u s citizen on u s soil absent an imminent threat and i hope based on that representation of the department will support that legislation well that's totally consistent with the letter that i sent to senator paul i talked about nine eleven and pearl harbor both of the instances where i said it might possibly be considered but the other than that we would look at we would use our normal law enforcement authorities in order to resolve the situation is along those lines and then use the little time and anyway we meet in the broadview library every month and we try to come up strategies what a good oh i'm sorry or drop it drop here we go this is just we do this and we have to make whistleblowers that are in you know jail right now or their lives become absolute hell thus is my life they wake me over the coals they've made me so broke they break my cars they break my computers they break my phone and they also break appliances and i gave a little piece of paper to our friend on here that the other day as looking in the paper and lo and behold look what you could buy you can have on your cell phone the ability to turn on and off your of it you know we're going to believe it turn on off your lights and i suggest don't get it i'm telling you what every time i have thanksgiving for the last two years and christmas is with my children my oven seem to break perfect timing and now it's absolutely broken so we can have bacon the of it anymore and that was two years of this happening and here you go you're starting to see you're now available to preset your oven from your phone on your way home on their freeway so again i'm not being paid for this i'm not a paid spokesman i don't represent anything but myself what i speak about our group is a branch from the national human rights group called freedom from covert harassment surveillance i've been using electronic surveillance as a defense for three years f and they're trying to show me as nuts and all i want to say is look at the news i've actually read you're probably not going to see any more much more snow and because they're going to want to get that offer oak way so good luck  america right good luck to us and there's there's lots of sites you can look up let me just throw those quickly at you you can look up big brother is watching us dot com you can look synthetic  you can look up i got apps dot com a video who is isaiah lamb is excellent another video is control factor a nother you tube would be to look up visit the man much worth watching all those videos are worth watching or one more thing there's also a bio ethics committee that you can look up and you'll see the human experimentation and you'll see people from doctors to mares that will be on there talking about the same pain the same torture the same house break ins the car vandalism the clients is the minds and view what you're seeing and that's what i experience but you can imagine what they have on t v is twenty thirty years ago technology so yeah it won't be up to date information  them in a state where they cannot function and it's  small scale terrorist attacks around the world and laser guided bombs and we have a laser target marker it's basically an i r strobe that we can point at a target so someone on night vision goggles and other aircraft or a pilot on night that are goggles can see that target so we have a lot of different options which is a look at the a g m one fourteen on fire a missile that's about one hundred pound missile so it's not very heavy but it's good enough if we see a truck or a treaty a high value target that we need to prosecute immediately that we would be able to information so i know again exactly where the aircraft is in space and that's based on an ion as and in the aircraft which is a navigation system and then g p s so we just g p s satellites as well that allow us to navigate you have  hellfire will hit where his crosshairs on a typical day would be you come in for your briefing you get your briefing from intelligence figure out what your mission's going to be and then you go inside the pictures things you never dreamed watching the forces and you can see them and you can see details and you can break out people and you can tell a humvee from a regular truck so you know it's are our guys and you definitely get the sense that you are sort of a guardian angel you're like an eye in the sky for that you're sort of their third eye if you will and that's a really good feeling because i really i think most of us really respect what they do on the ground and the ability to you directly support them as we consider a privilege the military is high demand of the president has paved the cameras that they can put on it is the rockets and that's the main thing that people are buying it for but you'll never hear an israeli official admit that pilots remoteness to the field make a killing too easy hear i'd like to address three areas and i'd like to start with the topic you were just discussing the topic of drones in your response to senator paul yesterday you suggested there may well be circumstances in which it is permissible to use drones to target a u s citizen on u s soil i realise that i've hit on something one of the letters written in my defense stated that inside the book and documented forty five current communist goals from one nine hundred fifty eight and as i slowly read through the list seen how specific their agenda had been to subvert us on the inside i could it accomplished almost every single one of them and nobody seemed to be guarding sing for at least the last fifteen years i've been working actively behind the scenes in the shadows trying to move up people and our culture in a direction that was designed to destroy someone needed to find out the truth of what had happened to our country especially when most of them have national budgets backing their appetites for weapons one of the drone operators who didn't want to show his face on camera introduced us to one of the drones manufactured by the time of day first of all  look ma no pilot after the operator on the tarmac gets the drone in the air flying duties are handed off to a sort of portable control room so those containers where they actually a pilot drone from i'm going to have a look carried out by drones are ten times more deadly to civilians and strikes by man the the strangest thing about the guys in the control room is that they don't even have to be there it's only israeli laws that require drones to have spotters to mend it put men in case of a malfunction otherwise the drones can pretty much operate independent my drone it dawned on me that the drones would soon be able to select in gage targets autonomy in fact the technology is already here we've only to make the decision to take humans out of the loop and turn our remote sufferings of your projected years why don't you did you learn nothing right and mormons a pisses me off because they've got more scripture than anybody else which means essentially that for them to ignore scripture that means they have to ignore more scripture than anybody else and what's really fucking it just really blows my mind is that there are scriptures the book of mormon is written so plainly it's written so that you can't make mistakes you can't misunderstand some stuff especially in doctrine and covenants doctrine and covenants doctrine covenants rules and agreements that's what it means and these guys do their best to ignore it so i'm like well if you're going to ignore your own scripture no wonder you don't have a billion mormons on the planet this is so large so you i don't know where it ends but hopefully this will get on air with voice to accompany it because we know the government controls my phone they they drop my downloads at night nine percent on the internet we know that what's your name debra weber has gone nuts the federal witness to nine eleven to stand in my house for three three months she finally went nuts and she's going to just lose it over you know all the directed energy weapons being used on her it's scary make this up if there's any lawyers out there watching this get ahold of me if there's any movie producers want to want to real movie doubt blow your mind of what this government could do to a person that destroy them google me if you want to see all the crap that sure like court is put on me google me i want to i want to have a real cop investigate i want to have a detective who's going to watch my death happen that say i'm not going to die and go mentally ill what a thing to hear you're going to be bump into walls my biggest fear because i went to a western state scary place you know what the what the prosecutor shoreline said i am a danger ike my community and i should be on medication well you know what if you lady you are part of the problem and you are probably part of the illuminati and you are going to pay in the end for your problems not by me by the ones who  that was a brazen admission out there really from you know from eric holder from the department of justice and this is in response to a letter from kentucky senator rand paul asking specifically can you kill an american citizen on u s soil and so what they said is that yes the administration believes it does have that power under an extraordinary circumstance but they did add that they had no intention of doing so how do you michael that's what's to make us feel better it's like i say don't worry we can do it but we promise if you know we get attacked by aliens you know we need the drones to protect us so as some american citizen aliens that are out there but that's a problem with you know when you use language like that to when you say an extraordinary circumstance what does that necessarily entail let me just show you a tweet sabrina from adam serwer who originally was reporting on this site or mother jones he said people have very polarized reactions to quote extraordinary circumstances i don't they find it common sense slash comforting or or wailing and well that's the thing you know so much of  thing the phrase ology that they've used to outline you know the legality of their drone program it's very questionable and it's open to so much interpretation that's what makes it so difficult to sort of draw a line and terms of what here you know on american soil there again using very uncertain language around what would make it legal for them to you know to target a drone strike on u s soil and kind of like we were saying it's such a hypothetical situation and it is sort of a move on their part to make people feel better and try to spark less opposition or outcry over that kind of thinking because you know extraordinary circumstances and invoking nine eleven invoking pearl harbor what they're doing is they're interesting right if could day use this if they find some terrorist driving along the highway they're going to blow somebody up here that's the question because if after some sort of catastrophic event yeah it's going to be all gloves situation off and anything goes but the question is that would have seemed completely crazy we weren't even talking about years ago and now we just move on from one hypothetical and the next the becomes more and more extreme can we kill an american citizen right you know without any due process now is it can we kill when on american soil it's