may twenty sixth we had quite a spectacle yesterday on t v meet the press with john brennan saying that the twenty they didn't find anything no there was no exhaustive investigation and the f b i ran a massive operation to shut down investigate so fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were from saudi arabia and so now you drugs he ran the special assassination operation for obama he met with him every tuesday this is the guy who was put it to the charge of the cia turning j sock which is eight which is in effect ape and executive branch killing machine independent he was also the cia station chief in saudi arabia he's perky he speaks perfect arabic and he this is war this is war and the people of new york city are going to sit back what happened is that the washington post then echoed an editorial calling him on money today but they wouldn't cover it they wouldn't cover his his his meet the press in the new york times because they know that the population of new york  s hands but now they've declared war on the people you amateurish declare war openly on the people who have for the last fifteen years been trying to get to the bottom of this including  graham the families of the victims of nine eleven oxo we now have an open war so i'm not going to go into the whole twenty pages thing because you can you can go to various websites you can go to the r website but what i want to get at right now is to go in and depth not detail of what this situation is all about what is the real issue here  k now we have come up to a point in war history where it is important for the average or even above average individual to discover what the issue is why do we have these wars going up isn't because it's human nature is it because we have nations and it is easy to get people to fight for their nation against an enemy nation our wars are always going to be is a part of human nature and my answer is shocking not it is not part of human not some time ago there are these are anthropologists and archaeologists who have a theory that the reason people gave up the coffers of pastor are communal neolithic life for cities but for protection because of wars and if you can get people into a city you can defend yourself from being a right and so it just became the dick cheney theory of the of the foundation of cities or the hobbes ian version of the foundation of cities and so war against all we need we need a city to protect us now so they had a problem proving this because they would dig down they would have to go down to the very bottom of of  of the ancient cities to find the beginning of the cities to see if there was anyone you never really could get to the bottom of it then one woman in southern peru india to have to come and desert came and so they were able to do a lot of the archaeological dig all the way down to the beginning and they were hoping to find conflict there was no evidence of warfare for the first fifteen hundred two thousand  no evidence of killing no evidence of art depicting warfare and dick cheney people were very cheney version of of archaeology very freaked out and they said well no this cities are not do not come about by this they also found something very interesting they found this this this area and the agriculture was from on very very dry you know soils water would come down from ours and they would use the area somewhat like in egypt this is shocking and then they discover massive amounts of evidence of fish in their diet or what was their diet world the main protein source was fish and then they covered up the cotton was being used to make fish nets for the fishermen on the cost and they were exchanging the fish for the cop for them to make fishnets so five thousand years ago you had people fishing on with boats with nets in the area of a ro where you two distain you have these huge schools of sardines in fact if there is a massive catch in a particular year it tends to drive today tessa drive the sawdust area which has all these pressures and fish for thousands and thousands and thousands of years and this was what so what was just turn the handle was for the first fifteen hundred two thousand years so what was it it was a center of trade for the whole region it was a center of people coming together to discuss to change views to different people from different parts for doing different things that's what a city years city it's not about war it's where human beings can get together and have a social process and discover things and trade and also have a center for religious activity and so for the song so so this idea that you have beings are predisposed from the very beginning to have well there's a there's a part of plato's republic in the big relative beginning where he's discussing the nature of a social situation and how the population is supported have a society they would need to go to war so why do societies need to go to war because they become degenerate in a certain sense in the sense that they have leaders who decide that it's and so once you start that process you need to have a military but that you support the military you have to go plunder your neighbors this is how one became wrong this is how babylon became babylon this is how persia became per its not necessarily how egypt became so what is it its empire and what's an empire and there pyre is a system which is not willing to be productive to sustain itself and to change that productive chain with others to sustain itself but is looking for exploitation to sustain itself and to sustain a class of people which includes dogs who would have to do that do the plundering now and what happens to an empire is its cancer that has to get ultimately has to die and also ultimately has to disintegrate it is not a long term viable system yeah wrong lasted a long time but the destruction that run on leash to out the world was quite incredible and then they would build it up as a losing operation and it was based on slavery and then later it was based upon something like serve serfdom so so now let's look at another part of the world where there has been a five thousand year continuous culture around the same time as egypt and peru but it's continuous it didn't die out the same people who were there five thousand years ago how it have to predecessor culture of the people who currently are there and it's not an accident that as they are the most populated country in populate people on the planet as far as as far as a culture i'm talking about the chinese the chinese what have who have largely though not always have largely maintain a confucian philosophical value system have never had a need to go out and conquer mine because they've always believed that that's all that's stupid you're spending a lot to ponder your neighbors when you can you can trade with your neighbors you can you can create wealth yes china has disintegrated and gone in different ways but they they have are they really only only society we know of where they have a continuous culture for five thousand years and today that culture is reemerging empire as much as they're going to be labeled an empire they're not an empire so so what's the has to involve some kind of repression to force people into a pool pondering condition where they are not allowed to have the benefits of their production but that production is down yan from them ok to use for wars or use to make an elite powerful by the way this was hit was their intention in the third reich it was it was a revival of run where the german people for the area and race would take all the other people and kill them off in slave labor camps so that because it was their right to do so because hitler did not want industrial society he wanted a communal  so the issue of supporting one society through development and expanding one's production ok but that only leads to more population therefore it is better to have the world at war to keep population down that's th whole point so if you produce you expand population and then you reach a certain limit and then you've got to have a war that's the perspective now the problem for the modern period is that there is an absolute limit to the development that was possible with human and animal physical labor the boundary condition for development was the fact it ultimately you can only do so much with animal labor and human physical labor and it was live it was a one began to try to coming out of the renaissance in europe to try to find a way to break opportunity among those fuel there were those who had an opportunity to get an education and to public be thinking about things and reflecting on things and they could not help but reflect upon the fact that they were privileged to see the fact that the rest of the population did not have those opportunities because they had to they had to maintain themselves in the field for you know they had to maintain a kind of be a beast of burden type existence so if you're a human being and you care this is a profound tragedy a tragedy beyond belief how do you change there how do you change and the people who are poor in those in the renaissance so we have to create science and technology which can do the work of human labor and steam became steam power with  before alignments but lives could never get the fall backing for this from the government from a monarchy to get this implement because it's not just about steam power it's about designing the steam engine it's about finding the source of coal to bird to create the steam you know it's about it's about finding a manufacturing capability developing a seven to seven hundred sixty seventy five that's eighteen years he actually had the influence on the in england amalia leitz and among it for his representing the colonies what have you he actually organized it awards pipes and he put together the project that actually led to the creation of the steam engine our nation's founder benjamin franklin launched the industrial revolution in great britain the greatest industrial revolution the greatest revolution of all mankind why because by beginning to replace human labor with machine with machines that could do the mechanical labor of human beings you began to create the potential to develop the our culture to develop the productive powers of the society to the point where you could bring people into a condition where they could have the leisure to develop that is the issue right now that is the issue china intends to put the entire world through that process at this time with others who wish to do it is to create a full industrialization of the planet that's what they're that's what their whole population that has been toiling and toiling and toiling the land they've done a very good job at that but now they want to take their entire population and go into a full industrial revolution so the issue is the industrial revolution is a for industrial race the ending of economic slavery it's the ending of slavery are we in our nation we have a legacy of slavery and the british franklin and then the english really stay just wanted to take control of what the british had and that was what the revolution was all about that's a lie franklin saw the colonies as the leverage for bringing the industrial emerged are powerful with private armies and they raped india and there were plenty they were in the process of raping going to rape the colonies and the possibility that franklin song of having a future industrial revolutions from the colonies did not materialise with us so at that point he went for independence he didn't go for independence because he wanted to be independent from the british he went for independence because he was a scientist and he had organized all the scientific academies scientific associations all over europe and he initiated the industrial revolution why he initiated us through it because he understood that without that kind of revolution you could not elevate the population to a higher level of culture or education or freedom or fart that's the issue today and what happened in the united states as a slave system was never dealt with a compromise cultural world to develop the power of agriculture he didn't want that and today we still worship thomas jefferson right an agrarian populist right of display system and that led to the civil war because because the north was developing the industrial transformation the south was not it was against it and eventually isaf was losing power and they went for  empty and that didn't get resolved unfortunately because we had the british come in with ray science convincing a lot of americans that they did their industrial powers based on their under white race and then bertrand russell came in and attacked science and then we had the counterculture revolution and sixty and we kennedy was killed and we don't we obama just shut down the space program what was the story here and we have environmentalist run from the monarchy created by the monarchy what do they say promises back no industrialization is the problem industrialization is what's causing the imbalance industrialization is what's causing the extra carbon we have to shut it down why because they want to keep the population in slavery that's why and the chinese won't do it so what's this twenty eight pages about it's about the fact that the a good chunk of humanity and the sec that point and the russians have to intervene and that's what john brennan represents that's what obama represents that's what the bush family represent they represent promoting fostering protecting the terrorism which americans to see that everything they thought about nine eleven would be tire history since nine eleven has been there since their conception of it has been wro