now he was viciously attacked virtually by everybody that's a proponent of genetic engineering even some of the regulatory agencies said this was bad science he did not anticipate this to be a cancer study if he would have anticipated that he would have had forty or fifty rats in each group the fact that the rats the validate all the tumors they did was not his plan but it showed up but he got ridiculed as a result of he had twenty rats in each treatment now he's been vindicated in a major way because the french government is ordered to reap repeat of this study and they're going to raise the numbers of the animals up to level two where it meets all the studies toxicology and cancer but he fed these rats for their lifetime which is basically twenty four months the longest so called safety study of the industry to prove genetically engineered crops are safe has been three months or ninety days and his study the tumors that developed showed up at four to seven months on the rats the belt and the fastest that was the ones that were the genetically engineered food only eleven percent of the diet was genetically engineered food by the way and the ones that were consuming the guy from say all of these rats developed tumors before their life ended the endor street attacked him because he used the wrong rat it was the spray dolly rat it is the perfect  rat to use in this type of study for tumor development although he wasn't looking for it because they developed tumors at the same rate that we do at twenty three months the control rats were starting to develop tumors the biggest hypocrisy of the criticism is the fact that the industry used the sprague dolly rat in their ninety day study to prove the safety of  engineered crops as i said it will be repeated here's a picture of some of the the mammary tumors that those rats saw we're going to jump over the pond and go to germany for a little bit dr monica kruger is an excellent veterinary pathologist at the leap sick university she has done lots of good research pinpointing problems directly state in the feed supply and the damage in the do just to track germany has a cool overcast climate so they have a persistent problem with clostridium botch a lot of in the soil so that's always been an being male that they imported from the us killed three beneficial organisms in the room of the cow those three organisms are the controls for the clustering botulinum when you wipe out the controls the vast majority of the babies in that scenario that succumb to sids test positive for the botulism for the cluster and botch a lot of the organism they do not have genetically engineered crops in germany they're used lifeless it is a burned out prior to planning and they used to sit as a pre harvest jessica they did a random sampling of professional people in germany for they had volunteers from all for that none of them had anything to do with production agriculture or handling life and say in any way shape or form they had him come in and give a urine sample one hundred percent of them were during your and eating out higher is allowed to be in the drinking water supply dr kruger also documented a tenth of a part per million of life of say residue in the feed stuff for chickens wipes out three beneficial organisms bill second january of two thousand and ten it was to draw out the secretary's attention to a problem that we were seeing in livestock it was the identification of a new to science suspect organism that is causing spontaneous abortions in livestock beef and dairy cattle hogs sheep chickens goats pigs and horses were genetically engineered feed stuff that have been a sprayed with life of say are fed to the animal some of the higher incidence of these spontaneous abortions are as much as thirty to fifty percent in the female animals that are supposed to be helping the farmers make a living as a result of that letter and some political pressure by david murphy he was able to arrange a meeting with u s d a which we attended in july of two thousand and eleven dietrich an excellent researcher myself dr huber and of course dave murphy we had an hour and a half with u s d a we knew going into this meeting they were going to say where's your independent peer reviewed published research to document the validity of this organism you claim to be causing these problems in the letter dr huber appealed for assistance to help us get to the bottom of this problem because we didn't have the financial means or the equipment to get to the bottom of this this whole problem has been researched by one individual who shall remain completely anonymous first dr macneill talk spoke he explained to the people at u s d a that the farming customers that he advises one hundred sixty five thousand acres in conventional farming six thousand acres in organic h conventional farming cup customers that were the early adapters of life a sick technology and stuck with it and subsequently had to use more and more and more and more each year saw their corn fields in two thousand and ten at seventy five to one hundred bushels per acre when their neighbors were getting two hundred twenty it was due to the build up of the guy from say the soil and the subsequent nutrition and biological damage that it caused in the poor performance and yield instead of seventy bushel soybeans they were getting twenty to thirty then bob strike showed pictures and documentation from the airplanes and all of the disease in all of the fields that has become common place and then every once in a while there's a greenfield that's not g m  but it was my turn i asked a question i said please show me the long term independent peer reviewed published studies you have on file to document the safety of any of the genetically engineered crops agency has approved that received no response from all three of the u s d a department heads that were present norther want to system i then went on to quote scientific studies i izzy's study out of canada that documented that the cry one a p bt toxin which it is st told us this is supposed to per breakdown in the jest of tract was found to be present in ninety three percent of the pregnant women's blood blood that they tested and eighty percent of these women passed as toxin onto their babies then i quoted the gallagher study which was commissioned by the supreme court in india dr gallagher we're supposed to look at the safety of b bridgeable what they were wanting to introduce into india the first thing that dr gallagher did was document the fact that the o e c d sound guidelines of sound science research and safety testing have never been applied to safety testing on genetically engineered crops and that the fourteen twenty one thirty or ninety day studies have all showed varying levels of concern in blood work and other issues from the research and meeting ran fifteen twenty minutes long the head person from u s d a said i had to the i have to go i have another meeting i'm late i was positioned around the table in a fashion that i politely backed away from the table stood up between the door and that head person and i repeated my question would you please show me the long term independent peer reviewed studies you have on file to document the safety of any of the genetically engineered crops your agency has approved the response was that's not my job and that was a crude true statement on that person's part i politely stepped out of the way and that person left the person whose job it was was in the meeting and that person came up to me and said i would like to address your question we have an easy i guess for every genetically engineered crops that's been approved i'm going to explain it for your benefit any i asked means environmental impact study today if i were a company developing a genetically engineered crops i would do my own environmental impact study i would bring the paperwork to you at u s d a they would take that paperwork and then they'll say to the public now you have thirty sixty ninety one hundred twenty days whatever the case may be to enter comments on this we have an s o i forgot the last part after they take the comments they ignore all of them and they approve the plan we have an eight i asked for every genetically engineered crop that's been approved i said yes sir i'm familiar with that process i says i participate in it regularly i said i testified at the field hearing you had lincoln nebraska on roundup ready alfalfa and roundup ready sugar beets i said i was the only person that testified against the deregulation i was the only person that had peer reviewed published scientific studies to back up my testimony that documented the harm of life with say to the sugar beet and to the environment and the organisms in the soil i submitted additional comments through your online process i said sir the fact of the matter is science has absolutely no place in your approval process i know that's not your fault because that dates back to when the first bush was in the white house and we had a man at the head of the f d a by the name of michael taylor mr taylor oversaw two terms being a stablished relative to genetically engineered crops substantially equivalent and generally recognized as safe there was zero science behind either one of those terms being established and mr taylor is today the foods are in the current administration and has held a number of regulatory agency positions between now and then but his most notorious career copple schmidt is that of being a lawyer for months after i said sir we have a classic example of the fox guarding the henhouse i know that's not your fault i know you can't fix it but thank you for at least addressing my question i stuck out my hand he shook my hand he nodded his head got a little smile on his face and walked out the door picture dust combine which is combine ing genetically engineered life and state sprayed corn in iowa and picking up a lot of dust a gentleman i know in northwest iowa noticed a lot of dust in his brother's liberty link or more soul than his own just not g m o corn he lost a lot of dust in his father's roundup ready corn so one morning he cleans off a spot on the combine they combine in the liberty link corn he goes back that night he gets a dust sample new puts at the bag and he marks did the same thing with the glyphosate core then he noticed a lot of dust in his hog when they sent back the results they said warning anyone working in an environment where there's dust at levels above a thousand see if used program should have a protective breathing device sign for protecting yourself the liberty link corn seven million two hundred thousand total count of that seven million as aspergillus species two hundred thousand is penicillin the round is potentially one of the more dangerous molds to deal with this is there's nothing scientific about this  noticed a few things people have respiratory issues as a result of breathing this dust depending on the year it could be almost epidemic one year we had perfect growing conditions for maximum production of the micro talks in the soil the the bad organisms that are going to call caused the mold of michael jackson production to be in overdrive at the college where my wife works just about how many percentage of the people ended up with pneumonia with the respiratory issue not scientific this is an interactive slide i need you to participate with me do you recognize any of the names in the center of the circle have you ever seen a commercial in a magazine or on t v that says if you cannot afford your medication costs contact us we have a program what do you represent with that couldn't go on group of companies pharmaceutical did you know all they were the sole parent holding company of months out of one point in time and now they are still connected established the fact that all the companies in the center of the circle are in the pharmaceutical and chemical business we will start with chemical i want you to give me one word that you would use to describe a chemical that kills a weed or an insect and you are describing this chemical to a five year old child what one word might you use ok for use in poison to raise crops what do we raise crops for cereal and grain what does the bulk of the grain get fed to in using this poison on the crops if there were to be a residual effect do you think it would be positive or negative if there is a negative effect that might affect a greenfield degree into the livestock to livestock don't feel good who might you call for help when the veturi comes out where might what might he suggest you give your livestock to help them feel better if you want your livestock to grow faster and you could have a lower cost of production what might you give them to grow faster why do we raise livestock for who eats the if there's a resume jewel adverse effect from this poison that's used in crops that might affect the grain that could affect the livestock is there a chance that you can check to me if the people eat the meat and they don't feel good where do they go after you go to the doctor were might he send you with the piece of paper with his autograph on it does that preset a positive cash flow for the companies in the center of the circle i would like to reiterate all of the scientists that i am privileged to work with in varying degrees have the same belief and thought process relative to genetic engineering the potential is good if and when the technology is refined perfected and implemented as they purported to be we want to improve specifically in yield we want to perm prove specifically nutrition content increased environmental tell just such as dust increased mold and mica talks in levels increased need for antibiotics increased increases in a mutant system challenges inflammation and disease as well as increases in respiratory problems are told by the proponents of jew most that we need this to feed the growing population with the current state and status of where things are at what do you think do you want to feed this to your family your children your grandchildren what can you do a friend of mine in irvine california sent me this picture this sign was posted on the school yard where her children play warning pesticide treated area the number one goal life a state produce chemical in the world how many people have ever used that a ready to use handy little squirt bottle you pick up at one of these fast box stores and you go out you spray a weed in the crack of the sidewalk and weed dies i have a suggestion first i would ask you think about what happens to the residue that doesn't hit the plant that's on the smith when it rains like it is today where is that residue goal and then it alternative my mother always  a teapot on the stole she would fill that up with water full and turn the burner on high alert or sit there until she wessel then she'd pick that thing up and she'd go outside and she would pour that boiling hot water on all them weeds in the crack in the sidewalk she'd go back in the house and set the teapot on the store if she needed to should fill it again but then she'd go out and she'd pulling weeds out just like this they came out real easy after that boiling water hit them it's has some effect on it but amazingly it doesn't run down and affect anything after it's done if you would like to further educate yourself on this subject i strongly recommend this book i very good broad stroke picture of the whole topic of genetic engineering seeds of destruction by william  well documented book i only found one slight little thing that i would take issue with the rest of it seem to be right on the money here's another book that i would suggest you read it specially if you are going to become a mother or a grandparent it's entitle our stolen future i have purchased many copies of this book used on line for a penny and paid three ninety nine for the shipping now they may have a run on this if anybody follows this suggestion after my recommending this and every tour we've done in washington in the last two weeks but it's worth the money it's not a difficult book to read scientifically it talks about the end of can disrupting capabilities of synthetic chemicals d d t is a big and that's what we focused on to this point in time in the research the first research with parts per trillion levels of life of say was published out of thailand this year and they documented the fact that guy for say residues in parts per trillion was feeding the tumors to cause breast cancer at an excellent rick i put out a lot of heavy information so i got to give you something to leave with a smile on your face and hope a friend of ours in illinois sent these pictures he put conventional ears of corn in a sack and nowhere house and right genetically engineer corning put on the tree and he took this picture nine months later what do the mice and the squirrels know that the scientists don't know a positive alternative in two thousand and twelve we had the worst drought in the midwest since nine hundred ninety eight a man i know and a brassica to get sent me this picture this is a non g m old biologically produced farm with soybeans growing in it here's the fenceline this is a genetically engineered life a state farm to farm they missed the second passage life a state that's why this first rose green here for a little ways i don't know the deal there now i'm going to take you to iowa this is a gravel road that separates this field from this field you can see the yellow and the brown here that is a genetically and they do not use genetically engineered crops if i want to cross the fence this field imagine we go over here across the fence there's a field of triple stacked corn that was eight but i don't know that for a fact so i know twelve i know twenty seven maybe twenty eight this field saddled with the crop insurance at one hundred and nine bushels per acre in harvest and all for gra so they tell us without this technology we can't feed the world