was the warren commission appointed by lyndon johnson supposed to get to the truth of the kennedy assassination or to make sure no one gets to the truth why were the findings of the commission sealed for seventy five years if the warren commission deliberately ignore vital evidence and witnesses were they merely trying to fit the evidence into a prearrange president john f kennedy assassinated by lee harvey oswald or was possible merely a patsy even today conspiracy theories abound and the only clear agreement seems to be th they also marked for the first shots took place and made a note that said this area hid behind a tree for any shot from depository as of this date made one thousand nine hundred sixty four so the surveyors clearly showed that sas nation could not have happened as the government claims with lee harvey oswald three shots from school book depository and yet when the warren commission published this version of the survey map they had deleted all of these references that suppression o worse than that we see here that the warren commission altered their numbers of the frame numbers from the zapruder film all this throws the whole survey into question this means that any computer analysis made from the  data presented by the warren commission is not correct which means it doesn't prove anything lieutenant jack revel was the intelligence officer for the dallas police and  according to his testimony he left the texas school book depository rode back to the dallas police station with a military intelligence agent a man from the office of naval intelligence and over on a private arriving at the police station he met with i agent james toastie who had been in charge of oswald's case no telling what he learned from both these men but what we do know is he then went and immediately made out this report which is a list of the employees of the texas school but the bottom the fourth army command out of centanni oh and he told that on the day the assassination he got word from dallas that they had arrested a suspect and his name was alex james had them and he said he went to the army military intelligence files and found a alex james had dell who cross reference to a harvey lee oswald of six o five elsbeth so this was a mistake that had been made in military so about an hour and a half after the twelve thirty p m shooting on friday november the twenty second they got a police got a call that this someone had sneaked into the texas theater in south dallas and they rushed out there with squad was taken into custody and taken to the dallas police station when he arrived at the police station he had two sets of and then of occasion on him one said he was lee harvey oswald the other said he was alex james had dale as we can see from the selective service card which apparently is some sort of phony document because the selective service cards at that time did not have photographs on them so this is something that would put together the police are saying well you know who are you robert kennedy saying we have a man in dallas it's lee harvey oswald he's an ex marine he defected to russia he's a mean spirited individual in the category of a nut so hoover already had the lone nut scenario worked out listen to ours after the shooting at a time when the downside thirty's weren't even certain of who they had in custody circumstances can't last circumstances are the circumstances and although this is circumstantial evidence i think it's clear that somebody in position of authority knew more about what was happening then the dallas authorities or the media or the public at that t when comes the idea of more than one oswald you really get into a morass and yet there is clear evidence that at the very least someone was impersonating lee harvey oswald leading up to the time of the assassination in this document dated june one nine hundred sixty this is three years before the assassination f b i director j edgar hoover was personally aware of lee harvey oswald and sent this memo to the security division of the state pictures are all of the oswald who returned to the united states one or two of them are his passport photographs and one his arrest photograph from new orleans and family at the lower right is his arrest photograph taken in the dallas  headquarters as we can see the bottom four pictures this this fall all pretty much looks alike but the down the top doesn't quite look right the warren commission published this photograph of oswald they said taken about the time of his attempted defection to russia as being c it's really an odd looking photograph because we see the light source coming from his right with heavy shadow on the left side of his face and yet look behind you moment wall his shadow goes to the right as if there was a live shot source from the left one shoulder seems broad the other shoulders very slow p c and there's a notch in his hairline the  brow and the side of his mouth on on his right side appears to be retouched are painted in and when you draw lan down through this picture it seems like it's a composite picture of two separate individuals lee oswald on the right and harvey oswald on the left this is a common practice among the intelligence operatives to combine photographs like this so that someone who's imperson someone can pass through customs and and surveillance and they look pretty close to the original person here again we see evidence that these photos have been faked of two different people we see the moscow photograph on the right and on the left we see the man's photograph and we see the same problem they seem to be of two separate people and yet when combined we have a person that looks somewhat likely oswald at the bottom center we have two the photographs one when he was in the marines and one later in russia and when you match up the eyes nose and mouth to the proper proportions you found one of them a shorter in the other and this was confirmed by his medical records in the marines which showed oswald to be five eleven and yet at the autopsy showed him to be five nine even his own mother in one thousand nine hundred sixty seven asked to have the grav questioning marks and scars on the body and questioning the identity of the person in the grave when she was not the only one paul rudy who is the funeral home director who buried oswald told me that about a week after they buried  secret service representative showed up was asking him questions about scars marks on the body and one i'm finally commented that we don't know whom we have buried in that grave so there's considerable doubt over the coverup of this crime began almost immediately even before the show echoes the shots died away here we see the limousine and parking hospital the top has been placed back on the limousine you see a bucket of water there they were watching off the se s they destroyed this is evidence and should have been left alone the car then was sent on orders to lyndon johnson off to be rebuilt before there was any forensic study made of the car it would bullet proof glass was put in  it was painted black and is now display in dearborn michigan but ironically enough the new president lyndon johnson refused to ride in what i consider a smoking gun  is the testimony of an f b i fingerprint expert named james c cadigan someone altered this official statement in testimony and it's interesting to see why it also explains why so much of the evidence is in controversy in his testimony james cadigan was asked why a exhibit a twenty was not be silver to process for bringing out the fingerprints on various things and he replied i could only speculate and they said yes and he went on to say that there the all of the evidence was do that when you take it away from me but they sent it all to washington and according to kant again there was a huge number of hi rachel on f b i officials and security people poring over this evidence that whole weekend police chief curry said that they wanted the evidence up in washington laboratory and and captain fritz said i need some people to try to densify the gun to curry said to the warren commission he says far as i know we never received any of that evidence back is still in washington i guess j v rankin the chief counsel of the warren commission said yes the commission is still working with it so the government kept all the evidence begin with totally illegally totally against all the procedures at that time because there were no laws federal laws about assassinating the president on november the twenty six several days after the assassination there was a meeting him with the dows police dallas county sheriff's office and the f b i and it was announced that they had asked the f b i to come into the case and on this day this is when it became the official government evidence so what am i saying i'm saying that the f b i had all the evidence beginning the night of the assassination and for three full days before it became the official evidence they could have taken anything app they could have put any fabricated evidence and there was no oversight and no legal chain of it of evidence and custody this is because for the controversy that still rages over the all of the evidence was in the hands of the f b i with no public overside no chain of evidence is only one example of evidence that was skewed changed altered fabricated here we see on the right the commission exhibit two thousand and three of the warren commission which is the dallas police evidence sheet this is a sheet that listed all the evidence that they have the assassination and you notice at the era that they only that it shows three spent rounds were found ok three shots three spent rounds and at the bottom it's blank there except for the page number on the left a sheet as recovered in texas and it shows spent rounds found two they only had two rounds and at the bottom it says paraffin test made on oswald was positive on both hands negative on the face as soon as that is of all arrived at the police station they put paraffin on his hands and face to see if they could detect nitrates or gunpowder i have copies of that report and it states that there were no gunpowder on his hands or face and only traces of nitrates on his hands but none on his face this is pretty good evidence that he had not fired a rifle that day because if he had fired that bolt back he would have been hit with gases nitrates and gunpowder from that rifle and just less than two hours after the shooting he there was no trace of that on his cheeks but again we see  evidence sheet presented to the public to the warren commission instead of explaining this or explaining why and there was no gunpowder on his face or hands they simply delete that they hide the evidence away from me here we see what appears to be two identical f b i reports they're both have the same file number and dated the same day in sand by the same agent vincent drain one says that the wrapping paper found at the book depository matches the same paper that they said was used as a gun case to bring the rifle into the depository boswell since oswald worked at the depository and had access to the wrapping paper there this is incriminating evidence to show that i was well may have gotten the paper from the depositories place of work and used it to bring in the rifle however the other document says that the paper does not match the paper bag that they said containing the rifle so now which one of these documents is correct did they say the exact opposite thing when the f b i was questioned about this back in the one nine hundred eighty s a spokesman said well the one that says the paper did not match is a phony document which leads me to wonder how many other phony documents are in f b i files again another clear example of she kane read taking place over the evidence in the kennedy  assassination here we have the evidence is presented in the national archives today and we find that now there are three empty shell cases dallas police and one of the police fishel carried a third car to duran in his pocket for a few days didn't think to turn in his evidence and it suddenly turned up days later when after they had decided that scenario call for three shots you notice that three of the cartridges here two empties and one live round have a dent on the shoulder of the cartridge this digit serial number which meant it was not commercially available in the united states so the question remains is what intelligence service issued him a small minox camera commonly known as a spy camera  the lower left hand corner you notice a photograph of the back of general walker's house who the government says oswald took a shot at in the spring of one nine hundred sixty three and you'll notice that there was a car parked there and although you cannot read it it's very small you can see that there was no hold or destruction to this photograph yet when the warren commission published this photograph somebody had punched a hole in the license plate crime probably the strongest piece of evidence that convicted oz wall in the minds of the public was the fact that on monday night after the friday assassination henry wade the disinterring of dallas mentioned in the news media says how have i said we found his fingerprints on the rifle well fingerprints on the rifle that you know pretty well sensed it in the public's mind but let's take a close look at this serious piece of evidence again all of the evidence including the rifle was taken from dallas the night of the assassination and sent to washington and to the f b i the next day under this die a comment signed by j edgar hoover himself it clearly states no latent prints of value were developed on those walls revolver the cartridge cases the unfired cartridge the clip of the rifle or the inner parts of the rifle tone other words saturday following the friday assassination there were no fingerprints of little on that rifle on sunday the rifle was shipped back to dallas on monday morning it was taken by two f b i agents to the miller funeral home in fort worth where they were preparing as well for burial according to the funeral home director paul groody who has publicly stated and that evening in ri wade says a mentioned we've got his fingerprints on the line again serious question about so called hard evidence even when it came to the official result the government investigation was also skewing the evidence shading the testimony and according to this memorandum from attorney albert jenner to the chief counsel  rankin he says are depositions an examination of records and other data disclose that there are details in mystery lies memorandum which will require material alteration and in some instances omission so there is made ing here that they're changing altering things in that they're leaving out facts and data about oswald's background so much for a competent in depth investigation so with so much evidence missing altered changed no telling what nevertheless the warren commission concluded that one shot struck kennedy in the back of the neck passthrough did not striking the bone went on to strike official version and actually remains the official version although the house committee in one thousand nine hundred concluded that there was at least one shot from the grassy knoll but it probably missed so you can see the confusion now over what's happened and this confusion can all be laid at the feet of federal officials kennedy was never shot in the neck how can i say that well here is the official autopsy report which clearly states a se physician here on the autopsy face sheet on the left we see the bullet mark in the back to the right of the backbone below the shoulder blades but you notice the bottom left hand portion of this diagram is blank book and then all of the lab and argued that this is just a sketch and it's not to scale and it's not in proper proportion and actually the moon was much higher up on the neck and yet  on to the right you see the original document and it was marked verified by his personal physician dr george burkley again more cover up of important and critical information two things they cannot alter or the bullet holes in his jacket and a bullet hole in a shirt which are now still available in the national archives and they locate them when exactly where the autopsy said their dressing vertebra below the shoulder blades to the right of the back bone and i was argued that well he was waving in the shirt and his coat jacket rode up and therefore the bullet hole was actually much higher than it shows on the jacket but the same bullet holes on the shirt and your shirt don't rise  matter how much you want to raise so these are all specious arguments trying to explain why there was a bullet hole in the neck and not in the back but to simply go back to some of the testimony of people who were there we found that the autopsy doctor dr humes said a bullet hole located below the shoulders two inches the right of the midline of the backbone we also see from secret service agents shoulder so they all located them with and as at the same location it out top see in the back so please understand kennedy was never shot through the neck and that of course destroys the single bullet theory and the single bullet theory does not hold up then the lone assassin theory does not hold up so in this diagram if we take the actual point of the back wound thirds rising vertebra and connect it to the throat wound at the adam's apple in front we've got an upward trajectory which makes no sense because supposedly the assassin was sixty feet in the air shooting downward perhaps this is a new conspiracy theory hidden assassin in the trunk of the car but i don't think so but it just shows the disarray of the evidence in this case in the fact that none of this is ever adequately present into the pub from that kennedy was shot through the neck and not the back it came from general our forward are only an elected president he was appointed vice president by nixon and then when spiro agnew resigned commission ordered the authors of the warren commission report to change the wording from kennedy was shot in the back to candy was shot to the neg this allowed him to argue that kaka mamie single bullet theory the foundation of the single bullet theory is this slug right here commission exhibit three ninety nine they said this was a slug found on a stretcher parkland hospital although they never could nail down whose stretcher it was they try to say it was governor connally stretcher and yet there's evidence to indicate that's not true the hospital technician there all tomlinson said i'm not going to say it came from that stretcher in fact he said quite the opposite it seems actually it was planted there and who could have planted this leg and parkland hospital well jack ruby was seen at parkland hospital about one o'clock that afternoon of the shooting so his and going into the hospital carrying television equipment so it's entirely possible that jack ruby played a role in all of this even before he shot oz well in this news clipping we see that john connally's doctor clearly stated that he was not struck by the same bullet that hit president kennedy but the real proof came in this x ray of governor connally's wrist and as you can see there's more bright bits of metal that stayed in connally's wrist than are missing from the bullet that the government says calls the  that's how ridiculous some of the so called evidence is so what we have here then is the theory that one shot coming from sixty feet near struck kennedy in the back thirds rising berber didn't hit a bone but somehow coursed upwards through his body x did out his throat somehow twisted around in mid air came back down struck connally near the right armpit shattered his fifth rib came out the front of his chest  shattered his right wrist and linda up in his left leg as impossible didn't happen but you're expected to believe it happened and they've got experts who will tell you how many angels dance on the head of i mean how many shots could actually do this this is a transcription of the warren commission meeting for january the twenty seventh one thousand nine hundred sixty four they were just beginning their investigation and yet even at this early date they knew that this single bullet theory did not work here we see their own chief counsel jamie rankin as he ruminates and says well it seems quite apparent n paper where the bullet entered in the back that the bullet entered below the shoulder blade to the right of the bag bone which is below the place where the picture shows the bullet came out the mcmahon the shirt in front and that bullet according to our top see didn't strike me bone at all that particular building go through so how it could turn and he suddenly realizes he's saying how could turn him in there and go strike connally ne realize it doesn't work so he stopped and that's the end of that they knew better but still they sixty four was a young attorney for the warren commission and came up with this single bullet theory and here he is demonstrating how the bullet went to kennedy's neck and struck connally in front and it seems fairly reasonable until you actually look closely you'll see in the red circle marked with chalk on the back of this fella and you'll see that he has to hold a straight age about six inches above the shoulder to make it  connally it just didn't work didn't work then that doesn't work now but nevertheless they say well that's what happened further evidence of manipulation and obfuscation of the evidence comes  in the medical evidence here we see testimony from all the medical people in dallas all said kennedy suffered a gaping wound in the right rear portion of his head this would indicate a shot from the front and blowing out the right rear portion of his head at the time of the house select committee on assassinations they showed us a drawing reportedly of the autopsy photographs and we see that the back of his head seems to be perfectly intact but we do see a small what appears to be a hold up there and they said this was the entrance wound coming from the rear of his head and yet a few years later when the autopsy photographs themselves became publicly available we found that there is no hole back there only what appears perhaps to be a little splotches of dried blood and there's even hairs growing through it so again there was last in the seat with the medical evidence again the drawings that the house committee showed us shows this bullet hole now it's no not in the neck and it's not in the back it's kind of on the shoulder and it is not consistent at all with the bullet hole in the jacket so it's nothing but lies and deceit most telling of all is this story which got very little play in the mass media here we see general custer who was the x ray technician who took the x rays at kennedy at the autopsy also at the same news conference was floyd riebeek the photographer who took the autopsy photographs and both examine today say that the x rays and the photographs be shown to the public and being kept in national archives are not the ones they so we have again manipulation obfuscation of the evidence at the federal level here we see what purports to who took the original x rays said that there was no damage to his face no part of his skull was missing these are fake x rays so we've got fake x rays and fake photographs now resting in the government archives does this explain why there is so much controversy over the kennedy assassination but there was not very much controversy in one thousand nine hundred sixty four particularly after this february the twenty first edition of life magazine which everybody in the country  and we've got a backyard photograph of lee harvey oswald holding a communist newspaper and a rival pistol on his belt and the headline says lee oswald with the weapons he used to kill president kennedy officer  now this was published months before the warren commission came out from behind closed doors and concluded that oswald was probably the lone assassin and this is this is convicting someone even before they get a fair hearing but it certainly seem made of the idea that i was well was the killer in the minds of the american public but was the backyard photographs legitimate right there in the warren report captain  tells that as well i was shown a picture of him holding a rifle and wearing a pistol and he says this picture been large by a crime lab i'm a fixture found in the garage of ms paine's house he meaning  well said the picture was not is that the face was his face but that this picture was made by someone superimposing his face the other part of the picture was not him at all and he had never seen the picture before a phony picture a composite picture could this be true well we take the two known examples of the backyard photograph and we turn them into a color transparency one red and  and these are supposedly two separate photographs made with a hand held camera nothing should match and yet when you blow them up to the same proportion lay one on top of the other you can see that oswald's face is an exact match on both photographs this isn't a possibility unless exactly as he said it's a composite photograph with one picture of his face pasted over someone else's body is there even more evidence of this yes here we see on either side the backyard photograph which is essentially the same picture of oz walls face only done to different slightly different angle and someone  retouch the mouth flatly but you can see that there is a line running from one corner of his neck to the other corner of his neck and we see a broad flat chin and yet in the center we have oswald's police mug shot which shows oswald had little pointy cliff chan more evidence that this was a fabricated photograph intended to implicate oz wall but did the federal authorities at that time realize that this photograph that was something funny going on here and i submit to you yes they did in here is was extreme right is a third backyard photograph that turned up fifteen years after the assassination in the hands of a dallas policeman's widow and she said  her husband the policeman said hang on to this it will be worth something someday and we see that this pose is holding a rifle in the left hand holding the paper up in the right hand and yet the warren commission exhibit three seventy's tardy seven shows a fellow officer posing in the pose of the third photograph the one that was never accounted for and never explain and never seen for fifteen years this is suppression of evidence again a criminal offense i make mention of these stills from the zapruder film for a couple reasons number one on frame two fifty seven we can see what the back of canoes head should look like with normal shadowing and then on frame three seventeen we find what eleven hollywood experts have said was a painted on black spot on the back of his head this is to cover up the massive exit wound on the rear of his head indicating a shot from the right front this is tampering with the evidence and with the basic evidence with the zapruder film which has been called probably the best piece of evidence in the case the lower center we have a blow up of three fourteen frames three fourteen which clearly shows the driver greer turning to look back over his right shoulder but his hand remains on the stern wheel what some people have said is a kennedy simply didn't happen although there is some question as to the activities of the secret service because it was seen they were very slow to react having stayed up drinking the night before at the cellar club in fort worth  but as can be seen playing the he did turn and look back and kennedy at the time of the fatal head shot the brake lights come on the car slowed down can he was shot in the head and then the car accelerated forward here we see a polaroid snapshot made by a bystander mary morman right about the time of the fatal head shot in the upper right hand corner we can see abraham zapruder and his receptionist marilyn sitzman making that his famous film and then we can see kennedy slumped in the car with jackie kind of being over him but in the background behind the picket fence behind the concrete wall we see this figure of a man and this is not has not been doctored has not been photoshop has not been tampered with this is strictly a blow up of the image in the background and a similar polaroid camera has been tested and it is founded they do have sharp enough detail in focus to get a picture like this and what we see is this blow up which is clearly shows a man you can see is to as his hairline his right in his left ear you can see wh flash in front of his face either smoke or flash from your gun and his arms are in the classic raffle holding position and he's wearing a dark shirt with a similar simile circular patch on the left shoulder and a bright object on his chest which by computer analysis is shown to be muddled here on the right is the blow up of the figure that is going to be known as the bad man next to that we can see a dallas police uniform with  the circular patch on the left arm of the badge on the right chest and then we at the extreme left you can see a artist's representation of what you're seeing here the badge man photographed so now we i tried to tell you that we have a photograph of a man firing from behind the fence on the grassy knoll we have the majority witnesses in that area saying a shot came from behind the fence on the grass you know we got a picture of smoke drifting out from behind the fence on the grass knoll and we got acoustical studies pinpointing the behind the fence on the grassy knoll as a source for the at least one shot then if i try to tell you there was nobody there you would think i was an absolute fool and yet this is a kidney assassination and there are still people who seriously argue there was nobody but and the pig advance on the grassy kno so what we see is that there has been a tremendous cover up at the level of the federal government of the united states and it says cover up this suppression of evidence destruction of evidence fabrication of evidence witnesses these are all crimes in connection with a capital murder and all were committed the level of federal government this is what transforms what at that time was nothing but another texas homicide to a national co a ta now why would they want to get rid of the chief executive because john f kennedy was shaking up the status quo let's go back and and look at some of the things that he was doing to begin with he forced the steel manufacturers to roll back their price increases that they promised they were not going to do and they did anyway and he went on television and said this is not right and the public got with him and they forced the steel manufacturers rolled back their prices his brother attorney general robert kennedy was prosecuting organized crime as never before since in fact on the morning of these fascination he met with his organized crime task force and then about noontime of course his brother was killed in the task force never met again president kennedy also was trying to put a stop to the cia in the military make inroads on cuba after  bay of pigs invasion they continued to push for another invasion of cuba in fact in the spring of one thousand nine hundred sixty two the joint chiefs of staff approved a plan call operation northwoods and this horrendous plan call for assassinating american citizens and some of our cities setting off bombs in major american cities hijacking planes and ships and blaming it all on castro so they could stir up support for another invasion of cuba they probably the ranking officials of the cia the military they did not realize that there had been seeker agreements made at the time of the cuban missile crisis  kennedy and khrushchev worked out a day over to shift agreed to withdraw the offensive missiles from cuba in exchange we agreed to withdraw our offense missiles from turkey and pledge that we would not invade o support a military invasion of cuba which we have not but a lot of the lower echelon people were not aware of these agreements and so they were still pushing for vision of cuba kennedy and khrushchev for also reaching agreements on above ban on above ground nuclear testing they put in the hotline to moscow they were actually working to try to in the cold war which did not set well with the military bases in either country kennedy may have also sealed his fate when he talked about doing away with the all pull depletion allowance which was a the bedrock of texas all money got all the oil and gas people man a mafia is mad at him the military is mad at him and then in the summer of one thousand nine hundred sixty three he ordered four point two billion dollars of interest free money issued through the treasury department not the interest bearing federal reserve system thus becoming the second president in american history to try to issue money that was free of interest from the international bankers the first president being abraham lincoln who printed his own greenbacks to finance the war between the states and i for one do not feel like that it was issue or coincidence that both of those presidents were shot in the head in public this is a five dollar bills series one thousand nine hundred sixty three new notices says united states note and has red ink on it this was part of the money that kennedy issued that was interest free because it was issued to the treasury department not the federal reserve system one thing that definitely changed with the death of john f kennedy was our involvement in vietnam here we see national security action memorandum number two six three issue don't october the eleventh one thousand nine hundred sixty three just about a week after the d m brothers were killed and the vietnam struggle was beginning to reach a turning point in this document says the president approved the military recommendations contained in the report of mcnamara and maxwell taylor who had gone to report on the situation vietnam and they reported that they thought we had a handle on the situation in that we might be able to withdraw all troops disengage as from vietnam no vietnam war with the attendant raping of our budget the conflict between the generations the fifty eight thousand asked the people who are main the families that were tone department that were to happen if kennedy had lived but there were people who wanted that war just three days after his assassination and then president lyndon johnson issued this national security action memorandum number two seven three and although it starts off saying the objectives of the united states with respect to the withdrawal of u s military personnel remain as stated in the white house statement of october the second says it's going to everything's going to stay the same here under item six we find programs a military and economic assistance should be maintained at such levels that there magnitude an effect in this in the eyes of the vietnam government do not fall below the levels sustained by the united states at the time of the d m government well this is a convoluted way of saying we're not going to drop the financial of the military aid to south vietnam so in other words th these pull out orders the thousand men that kennedy said he was going to withdraw did not withdraw the document goes on to state the plausibility of denial that they could deny what was really going on damage to north vietnam we're going to start bombing the north we're going to widen the war and even spread to button drawn up plans against layoffs ok it's really fascinating but the most fascinating thing  ars here in this document which was taken from the l b j music library in austin texas this is the draft of johnson's national security action action memorandum to seven three which blocked kennedy's pullout order and set us on a course for full time involvement in vietnam and what you notice is that this draft was written on november the twenty first one thousand nine hundred sixty three the day before kennedy went to dallas and was assassinated somebody knew the day before that he wasn't going to be there to implement his pullout orders in vietnam and instead we were going to be launching a full bore effort for final piece of evidence has to do with president kennedy's personal secretary evelyn lincoln she was at his elbow almost day and night if there was anyone who knew what his real thoughts were what was really going on within the government it was probably evelyn lincoln and yet i doubt any of us have ever seen an interview with evelyn lincoln why not when she has that was she not talking one you know here's a letter my opinion were lyndon b johnson j edgar hoover the mafia the cia and the cubans in florida very good guess evelyn she knew what was happening and it's time the american public knew john j mccloy was former c e o of national city bank which is now citi corp and during the one nine hundred thirty s percent it over a lot of loans to the nazis in germany at the end of the war he was made high commissioner of germany and shipped a lot of and repentant nazis over to this country where his protege allen dulles was head of the cia and whitewash their nazi backgrounds and then john j mccloy ended up sitting on the warren commission to determine what happened t president kennedy while serving on that commission he stated it was a paramount importance to show the world that america is not a banana republic where government can be changed by conspiracy and that was their objective is to try to scotch any talk of conspiracy and that's been going on to this very day and there are still those in the status quo establishment who do not want to mention the coup in sixty three but unfortunately my fellow americans america is just another banana republic because in november of one hundred sixty three our nation and our future was altered by a murderous conspiracy accomplished at the highest levels of the federal government in the united states and that's all you need to know about the  see their evidence for a conspiracy at the highest levels of the federal gun of the united states is quite compelling if not overwhelming in fact if you want to name two people who could be considered guilty it would be lyndon johnson and his next door neighbor nobody j edgar hoover head of the f b i x and i say that cannot prove that they ordered the assassination no but what i can prove beyond any reasonable shadow of a doubt is if these two men took steps to confuse confound and block any legitimate investigation into kennedy's death under our legal system that makes them assess or ease after the fact and there have been people executed for  murder who the facts of the case show did not pull the trigger were not the killers but they were there they had knowledge of the crime and they didn't report it they didn't turn in the true culprits and therefore they were assessed sarees after the fact and are considered under our legal system as guilty as the person who pulls the trigger and under that criteria lyndon johnson j edgar hoover are guilty but they didn't act alone there was a whole raft of americans who  had no direct connection to the assassination but the end result the elimination of john f kennedy and his policies to curtail the power of the banks and the corporations and the military industrial complex and to try to bring