he received his doctorate in physics from vanderbilt university in one thousand nine hundred seventy eight his ph d research was conducted the stanford university linear accelerator center and is post doctoral research at cornell university one he was principal investigator for experimental cold fusion for the u s department of energy division of advanced research projects from one thousand nine hundred one until one thousand nine hundred three professor jones research fusion in condensed matter physics and do do tyrian for the u s department of of energy and the electric power research institute since mid two thousand and five he has applied his scientific expertise to research on the concern on the destruction of the world trade cent skyscrapers he was a founding member of scholars for nine eleven truth and in late two thousand and six he was instrumental in the establishment of scholars for nine eleven truth and justice dedicated to nine eleven research utilizing the scientific method he is coeditor of the peer reviewed journal of nine eleven studies so i'm very honored and proud to present to you dr stephen jo thank you all it's a pleasure to be with you here in sacramento and as david mentioned our paper on active thermogenic material discovered in the world trade center dust has just been published earlier this month and jeanette mckinley explained how that dest was acquired at least one of the samples we report in this paper on four separate samples i provide a little introduction to this research that we've done on the world trade center dust we all saw these luminous clouds of dust that were produced as the buildings were destroyed so we've looked at and probe very carefully this team of scientists nine of us looking at the dust to determine what information and there's a great deal of information actually in the desk that tells us what happened that day that information about the presence of an explosive or pirate technic material that has been ignored in the official reports in fact to my dismay nist the national institute of standards and technology has in fact refused to look for explosive residue in the world trade center dust but we have not we have proceeded and i like this quote from mahatma gandhi he said when i despair which i want us to avoid so i bring this to your attention i remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won and it's a remarkable fact there have been tyrants and murderers and for a time they seem invincible but in the end they always fall think of it always i'm convinced that he's right about that and that provides a great deal of hope i would like to talk a little bit about the collapse of world trade center seven and the destruction of the towers before getting into our detailed analysis of the material found in the world trade center dust so here we have on the right lower right a photograph of the world trade center seven building it's obscured by desk we're looking across the world trade center seven plaza sin trysting this is in the afternoon and if you look to the just to the right of center of that tall building is world trade center seven and it collapsed about seven hours after the collapse of the towers you did not see there a raging inferno fire because  fires were rather limited from what could be seen external to the building certainly and they were random and yet the building did collapse straight down pretty much onto its footprint at about five twenty pm in the afternoon on nine eleven now the world trade center seven has a more distinct photograph now on the right had twenty four steel beam core columns and fifty seven perimeter columns it was solidly built as you might imagine and here we will get to see the collapse of world trade center seven on the left and the collapse of a building i believe that one is in austin norway a known controlled demolition on the right with explosives ok you can see how similar these appear from the videos that we have of the collapse of world trade center seven notice that it proceeds basically straight down and we'll talk about free fall during a period of time for world trade center seven in a minute it's noteworthy that the nine eleven commission and their report failed to even mention the collapse of world trade center seven hence we see how already the need for a new  investigation a thorough investigation that will not ignore the collapse of building seven i support jeanette mckinley and her in her support for the new york city ca n referendum and i have already contributed to that and i hope that you will do that as well as we seek this new investigation that's one avenue for an investigation with subpoena power which is very important in this quest for a fair and open investigation i'm also encouraged by president obama as he says there will be more transparency let's hope that that is the case as we investigate again the events of nine eleven nist last august came out with a preliminary report finally after considerable delay on the collapse of world trade center seven and they said quote failure of a floor beam and fire is a rare event and indeed there have been many building fires that have not resulted in even local failures of the florida system they also admitted that there had never been a complete collapse due to fire which is true so here's what they stated as their challenge the challenge was to determine if a fire duce induced floor system failure could occur in deputy c seven under an ordinary building contents fire now you see there splaying that they're looking for a fire induced explanation for collapse the plea it already seems to have the blinders on we keep encouraging and encouraging them to look for residues of explosives so how did they proceed well first of all they did not test any of the steel in world trade center seven to look for the effects that they could learn from actual hard physical evidence on the steel instead they proceeded with computer modeling with parameters these are adjustable inputs into the computer model so basically it's a black box and one of the  let me try to explain what what they're talking about here let me go to this no thermal conductivity was used i happened to have with me here a i brought along  suppose but there's reasons we'll get to later and if i started the heat this with a flame it would slowly that he would slowly conduct across the metal even though iron and steel are not very super conductors a very good conductors but they do conduct heat and the certainly not zero and i would feel that heat after a short time maybe i've done that with a pin or a needle as i've worked on slivers i've had to heat up a needle with flame and that heat transfers along the needle stainless steel for example to my fingers quite quickly in just a few seconds well what they did is they they turned off with thermal conductivity now nature won't let you do this even if you are a national federal laboratory under incidentally the department of commerce i should point out ok now secondly another premise that is an observation in their model even after turning off the heat transport and burning office materials near this critical column column seventy nine they said in their report it appeared likely the critical damage state was the failure of this column occurred between three and a half and four hours now burning office materials we're talking about chairs papers carpet desks so if you made a fire a bon fire does it last three and a half to four hours with and no actually from our experience and nist interesting lee had previously published data on the heat release during the burning of office materials this is in one of their earlier reports and you can see from the plot there is to the read is the f t s model the black is experimental data they don't line up exactly but the point is that  by two thousand seconds the fire is is way down compared to what you had at about six hundred seconds six hundred seconds is  the six is about ten minutes into the fire so you see that by the time you get to forty minutes towards the end of the plot then the heat is diminishing just as you would expect if you built a campfire or even a bonfire the fuel burns up rather rapidly and you don't have anyone in the building continuing to push office materials towards this critical column to keep this fire going for three and a half to four hours nevertheless that is what they somehow assumed that there would be this intense heat for that period of time again the critical damage state occurred between three and a half to four hours now you can't just let  the office material fires continue to burn when the experimental data shows that they he diminishes rapidly after about fifteen to thirty minutes and secondly you can't turn off the heat transport another is the heat being conducted away from the critical column because there are critical i mean conduct connecting members connecting to these columns so that the heat is transported away in the it he is not zero now in a current computer model you can do any crazy thing you want it but nature won't let you do this in some of us feel very strongly that this should allow us to actually have their model so that we can test it and put in reasonable realistic parameters predicting of course that if we do that the building will not fail clearly if you requires three and a half hours of heating with no thermal conductivity then when you put in some conductivity and reasonable values for the length of time for fires then you'll get much different results now in august again august twenty sixth of two thousand and eight physicist david chandler and i both challenge nist on their per preliminary report world trade center seven for example in the report they said that they used a constant speed estimate to deter it in estimating the time for the fall of the world trade center seven i pointed out this is not good physics they also ignored and observed period of center seven and fitting a straight line over this portion as you can see fits the data points very well for a period of about two and a quarter seconds the acceleration works out to about nine point eight  eight five meters per second squared the acceleration due to gravity is nine point eight one meter per second square this is almost precisely the acceleration due to gravity and we both david and i challenge nist this is a public meeting  that is over the internet it's kind of interesting we sent in questions to nist saying look your report your political report has some big flaws and oversights and apparent errors can you look into this and they did look into it and here's witness came up with if you can remember that a little bit that fit to the data nist which read data points circled the data points and again looking at the actual videos of the collapse of world trade center seven they did a fit which is the red line and indeed for a period of two point two five seconds just as observed by physicist david chandler nist checked and sure enough there is freefall nothing in the way for over two seconds in the fall of world trade center seven a let's read witness about this is their final report now not in the preliminary report but in their final report believe it was november of two thousand and eight last year and here's what they say quote the slope of  approximately constant between one point seven five and four point zero seconds that's a time period of two point two five seconds a good straight line fit to the points in this range allowed open circles in the figure we just saw allowed estimation of a constant downward acceleration during this time interval quoting nist this excel aeration was thirty two point two feet per second squared nine point eight one meters per second squared equivalent to the acceleration of gravity g exactly where within experimental errors the acceleration of gravity g and then they go on this pre fall drop continued for approximately eight stories or thirty two meters one hundred five feet so for over one hundred feet the building as you look at the roof in both cases would mean that there is nothing in the way and that can't happen because as the building collapses there is a lot of material in the way i'm paraphrasing that's basically what he said and we agreed with happened now from the data nist is constrain to admit that there was freefall drop for a time period of two and a quarter seconds is unsettling much but when things are dropping over one hundred feet at freefall that is significant so this demonstrates this free fall drop that there was nothing in the way no beams no structure no concrete floors no significant mass no how do you get mass out of the way explosives is there any other way they didn't answer in a and a model of which you have the floor is still there because you didn't use explosives so the floors are intact as the upper structure hits the floors below the stationary floors it's slows the structures just like when you hit this does happen to as occasionally you hit something in the way of your car perhaps a smaller car it doesn't matter how small it is a slows you down some that's conservation of momentum in order for there to be freefall which means nothing slowing you down it means there is nothing significant in the way and they did not explain they don't answer how this could happen unfortunately now i thought they would after we caught them on their air they admitted they checked the data yes there is freefall it's amazing you'd think they would change their conclusions instead they simply assert without pro that this period of freefall for over one hundred feet followed by about one and a half seconds of impeded fall is consistent that's their word consistent with their results of global collapse as they discussed in chapter model do you think we're satisfied just to sit back and say oh well sure it's consistent whatever you say nist after all you're a federally funded laboratory we will believe whatever you tell we're not satisfied as scientists i'm embarrassed frankly is not from melting of steel in the towers because of the aluminum and silicon present in significant amounts in many of these and droplets the previously molten nature of these droplets is shown by the fact that they have formed into spheres when you blast water in the air it forms and disappears by surface tension liquid metals will do that as well and they form and disappears and then cool and you find all these figures just in very large quantities then in the world trade center dust now there are some close up photos of the red great chips can you see the in the right hand photo you see the red side and then the insert shows one of these red great chips turned on its side so you can see red on one side and this shiny black gray surface on the other very characteristic very interesting we find it in all the samples that we have examined so far the world trade center dust which is six samples by dr fair and myself four of these are reported on in this article we keep looking at more samples others have observed these are red great chips as well this photo was taken by mark the sill a scientist in new hampshire area clearly in this photo this photo micrograph by mark to sell the red and the gray layers very distinctive very and unusual in striking now this is the electron rechecked and rechecked the data that went into this paper most of the photo micrographs and x e d s well certainly i took a lot of the photo micrographs through the optical microscope he did most of the  electron microscope the s c m and b s c images that you'll find in the with this machine that you'll find in this published paper ok here's the paper as it appears now online it is an open journal we selected a journal that would allow us to publish a lot of data there is something like thirty three figures thirty i can't remember exactly thirty  three figures color twenty five pages that's a long paper and this journal was willing to work with us it took a long time very tedious peer review process  many pages of peer review on the initial submission followed by this paper this is a photo of neil's herit who became the first author a long story and great great fellow professor associate professor at university of copenhagen in denmark he's been speaking out in europe for instance denmark and paris i know he's spoken out on these results and on nine eleven in general course he's very skeptical of the official story of nine eleven and agrees with the conclusions of this paper which are the red material in these chips is explosive or pirate technique material and should not have been in the buildings that's his statement is this material should not be in a commercial office building certainly not in these quantities as we'll see some nine plus tons of this red material in the world trade center dust extrapolating and estimating but that's a lot of material from what we've observed i'll go through those numbers in a minute we see these chips  characteristics as we'll see in all four samples so we do a check a consistency check between the various collectors and we see the same signature in all four samples this is now a higher magnification this previous was an optical microscope see a higher magnification in an electron microscope we see the red layer here on top and the gray layer below at this magnification we can already please make note of it and first we look here at the gray layers which show oxygen and iron very clearly a small carbon p and question a rose i had this question early on compared to now a perhaps what we're seeing is rust in the gray side and the other is the red is just paint you know so we're going to check that  hypothesis we checked very clearly looking at the red layers however there is no zinc no manganese seen either the composition the nominal composition of a thirty six steel as used in the world trade cent chemical signature the principle elements are the same anyway no manganese and no zinc it's starting to not look like steel from the buildings because the lack of manganese and not like paint either not like primer paint as we'll see because the lack of zinc noticed the elements that are there carbon significant peak oxygen aluminum silicon and iron the one peak number three has a small amount of calcium potassium and so far but that could be some contamination dr fair was very careful to break these if you can imagine these small chips that he broke a piece and then looked at that fresh surface there's still there's so much calcium sulfate in the dust that you can still use often quite often see calcium and sulfur showing up just for that reason because the  illuminates calcium and so on but the absence of zinc again shows that this is not the primer paint even frank greening admitted that if you know thank you  let's go back it is not there and others have said well maybe this is some how can you know as the buildings fall you just get a mix of i don't mix as and you get this wonderful red stuff sorry where is the manganese first of all and where is the other junk that we find in the dust which is ink and chromium and calcium and so on in abundance but you see those are not seen in abundance read at least part of this paper ok that's good but it's obviously not all so i encourage you to to read it it's not hard to find if you google for instance herit open chemical physics journal should pull right up for you read great chips is a good way to google for this so i soak to some chips in paint solvent working with dr fair we found this is one of the early tests we did the chip does not dissolve now paint which we also soaked in i mean i bought this solvent it's methyl ketone purchased at a hardware store it's a paint solvent so i put you know chips a pain in there and they dissolved certainly the pain got flimsy and then you see dissolving dissolution but these chips to not dissolve at all and there is no zinc and now this is not as just not paint instead what you see in these  photographs is that the red portions swelled the the gray black portion did not seem to be affected by the solvent at all the red portion swelled and can you see the in the right photo the poor aussie that's now evident in the chip the red material and perhaps you can notice that there is some red material which in with pores this is primarily silicon  dioxide silica with some iron oxide mixed in and then in the left hand side of this photo the right photo you see a silvery reach and we found that the aluminum aluminum separated out with under the action of this paint solve a very interested member there's a lot of carbon in here the carbon does seem to breakdown ok let's look at the data getting ahead of myself this is in the paper  after the m e case so we now see regions where we see aluminum separated from silicon and oxygen so if you look at the leftmost blot you see a region you see the silicon an oxygen very little bit of iron essentially no aluminum we this is not aluminum  at the middle plot you see a large peak of aluminum very little silicon again this is not aluminum silicate because the aluminum has now increased dramatically just has been pulled out of this matrix of stuff in the and so there must be at least some elemental aluminum which is one of the prime ingredients of thermite there is also iron oxide as shown in there right most plot oxygen and iron here the oxygen in each case was sufficient to completely oxidized the iron unlike the aluminum where the oxygen was insufficient to oxidize all of the elements see the difference so elemental aluminum had to be present some of it at least was element you know what you have little bits of aluminum little particles little particles aluminum you get an oxide layer that forms very rapidly it's called the passivation that occurs on the surface and actually protects the interior aluminum from being further oxidized sorry science it to me this is exciting you look at that you say well well there's a low minimum in there elemental aluminum it's not a luminal silicate because the silicon separate and there's iron oxide this is not just elemental liar we didn't find any evidence of that in the red material so now we go on to higher magnification fifty thousand power structure fair pushed it up in this he's the first to see this i'm just getting goosebumps here again i miss you you see these grains can you see the extreme right there the bright spots and you see them  more in the like the center of the s c m image as well but these are grains and they happen to be rich in iron in oxygen and the aluminum is found in these plates can you see right near the center below that set of grains there is a luminous and then around this there's this kind of wavy material this is an organic matrix richen carbon now this red material is most interesting to us because it has aluminum inside these plate like structures the plate like structures are quite uniform in thickness from what we can observe with the scanning electron microscope fifty nanometers wide plus the iron oxide appears in these ultra fine faceted grains approximately a hundred nanometers across and again very uniform again let me emphasize this is not from the building collapsing with sure there's a  iron and titanium and calcium and sulfur and zinc and copper in the building but that's not what you see here here you see uniform right grains this is engine neared material i just you know if you're a scientist you just can't say well randomly the building falls down and we're going to get a few of these things and we get nine tenths of the stuff so extrapolate so there's not building stuff randomly mixed together but what can it be ok now  we'll discuss the three medic reaction which involves aluminum elemental aluminum and iron oxide which are present in the red material when these are ignited so i show in this little demonstration experiment that i did hot coming out of this reaction it's extremely hot and you get molten iron you notice you start out with iron oxide but you end up with iron what happened and you start out with aluminum and end up with aluminum oxide can you see what's happening the aluminum grabs the oxygen from the iron oxide and you get the end products aluminum oxide much of which comes off in this plume it looks like smoke cept it's white it's quite bright and it's floats away fine white plume and the molten iron then form reduced iron we'll see but i want to just say now our thinking about it this red material when we ignite iron spheres many of these spheres are nearly pure iron not not enough oxygen in them to be iron oxide you see less than one to one even so we get molten because it was fears now iron that are formed from the red chips when we just heat them up to about four hundred thirty centigrade is will see they react and release a lot of energy and then we get one thing i'd like to get perfectly clear if i can possibly and i wish there is someone here from this to would listen to this thermite i agree is an incendiary ordinary thermite which means powders of aluminum and iron mixed together and they burn as incendiary so you see this molten material this is ordinary thermite here in the photo and you see the molten iron coming out of that's an incendiary it melts things but the ultra fine grain form is an explosive it reacts very fast the smaller the grains the faster the reaction that's been demonstrated in published papers and we see for example this is from a lawrence livermore national lab anybody here from livermore i welcome you i'd like to discuss this with you in fact we have been in contact with dr tillotson saw the dr fair has been in contact with him haven't learned too much yet but were but there they published papers as we will see is a incendiary or be explosive be ok very good now actually you can tailor nano thermite which is interesting so that you can make it react faster or slower louder and it's just has all these variations you can tailor it but it can be explosive is what i'm trying to say here as you see from the photo from lawrence livermore national lab  interestingly they asked livermore if they could show this photo a photo from a published paper and livermore declined would not allow them to show nano thermite exploding but it does see very important here's what i was looking for this wonderful map this is in the paper so you can study it a little bit of homework on your free time it's again just so exciting dr fair took his maps in that look at that you know so what are we looking at here upper left is an image through the electron microscope you see the bright grains how do you know they're iron and oxygen well you look at the blue picture that's for effie and other words were scanning over looking for iron looking for blue the purple is aluminum the green is oxygen the light blue in the lower left corner is silicon and the red is carbon so you see where the where these things lie and what we see is that we have iron oxide and aluminum although here you can't tell real clearly where there it's aluminum oxide or not because there's so much silicon as this stuff is constructed and engineer it wasn't until we did the m e case separation that we found the aluminum pulled apart from the silicon oxide and that we're able to nail the presence of metallic aluminum again you can look in the paper there's another as see a map there but again we have this all intimate mixing of iron oxide and a very tiny grains of this oxidizer it goes about back about ten years before nine eleven two thousand and one certainly long after the buildings were constructed i get that question could not have been put into the buildings when they were constructed because it had not been developed at that time it's a new high tech technology and here are some of the uses livermore reported two thousand and four they go on into by introducing a fuel metals such as aluminum into the metal oxide silicon oxide matrix energetic materials based on thermite reactions can be fabricated i am not making this u this these national labs explaining this wonderful explosive material organic additives hence the carbon observed can cause the generation of gas upon ignition of the materials therefore resulting in a composite material that can perform pressure volume work boom right explosive work method and they describe a method of making nano structured energetic materials specifically monoliths and thin films of the hybrid inorganic slash organic energetic nano composite hence we expect to see car has organic and inorganic how does it compare with known nano thermite when ignited let's heated up like they do at the national laboratories and find out so we use their conditions ten degrees centigrade per minute in air and you heat it up and in their case the nano thermites they made it they know what it is that's the red curve goes off it just about five hundred center great in the case of this and the the peak there is actually quite narrow compared to regular thermite it's also at a lower temperature i'll show you that in a minute you know this is the way we can this is a mckinley sample jeanette and look at that very narrow and goes off at about four hundred thirty seven very little lower in temperature the finer the material in general the lower the temperature at which it ignites the narrower the peak the more explosive you see the faster the energy release the world trade center redgrave chip ignites at a lower temperature than ordinary thermite and it's narrower this called an x so therm than even known nano thermite from just down the road here lawrence livermore at the energetic material center at lawrence livermore national laboratory published in this proceedings on the left you have ordinary thermite on the right you have nano thermite if i can help you read this scale the ordinary thermite goes off at about nine hundred centigrade and their nano thermite goes off at it's below six hundred like about five fifty in this case center grade again the finer the material the lower the temperature so that distinguishes again nano th ordinary notice how much broader the ordinary thermite peak is compared with nano thermite this is like no paint you've ever seen before let's review quickly  the red material will not dissolve in any case this is after fifty five hours there's this hard chunk left i've got a photo of it down at the bottom it's highly morris high and silicon this skeletal silicon oxide matrix i remains after a long soaking whereas ordinary paint dissolves resistivity differs it's attracted by a magnet the red material it has carbon silicon oxygen iron and elemental aluminum but no zinc on a clean surface no magnesium no manganese to speak of no titanium no chromium so i'd like to see a paint that has that coarse might be a fairly explosive paint you see as we're finding out the iron oxide is in quite uniform grains that are approximately one hundred nanometers across and faceted the aluminum is found in plate like structures again i'd like to see a pain like that but don't bring it to close to me when it's dry please further tests that characterize these red great chips and therefore characterize the world trade center dust as you know we can tell them we've got world trade center dust because it has these striking unusual red great chips in it the red layer ignites at about four hundred thirty centigrade the d s e trace is near zero and it produces iron  i want to point out as we observe that these are uniform grains intimately mixed nanoscale and narrow exothermic this is an engine neared material this does not happen just from a building collapsing i should add we actually looked at dust from ordinary controlled demolition so you have this collapse of buildings caused by explosives but ordinary explosives like c four we looked at the dust in some detail daniel farnsworth and i for red great chips this was the demolition then the stardust resort in las vegas no red grape chips at all and we plowed through a lot of material same way with the key bank in salt lake city these are discussed in the paper these are controls and no red great chips in the controls ok just in the world trade center dust that we've seen ok oh boy you can read some of this the paper i'll let you do that but this is from an april two thousand and one conference in san diego and they say in the middle here by two thousand and one when this conference was held in april at this point in time all of the military services and some deal we and academic laboratories and certainly overseas laboratories as well have active r and d programs at exploiting the unique properties of dental materials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives these  results were published in mt at the quarterly department of defense publication i understand and as we look at this that's what i was just quoting from this meeting held in april two thousand and one i look this is from the article talking about the uses of this advanced energetic material this nano thermite for example at the top you see kinetic energy munitions in the middle you see thermobaric applications for a nano thermite and at the bottom you see a very interesting application a shaped charge this explosive material can be formed into a shaped charge just like c four and can have through steel not melt through right you see the difference right ordinary therm incendiary nano thermite can be formed into an explosive shaped charge now it's not easy to make this stuff this is again from the report making the  high tech explosives this was done at a naval facility and suddenly again this material could well have been outsourced i'm not saying it was necessarily done even in this country that's a very interesting question where this stuff was made and who made it and who ordered it made and who put it into the building and those are the crucial issues this shows what is required to put these materials together very high tech process to intimately mixed culture find aluminum with alter find iron again out of this and teac report how much material was in the dust i want to go through this argument quickly we report in the paper the first paragraph is a quote from the paper fifteen small chips having a mass of one point seven four milligrams extracted from one point six sample of dust from which readily identifiable glass and con fragments had been removed by hand the fraction then i've read great chips is approximately one tenth of one percent by weight in the separated dust in separate dust is about three times that a rough estimate the amount of dust from the w t c destruction is estimated i refer to see work by gregory europe ninety thousand tons he sent me an email actually about that that brings us to about twenty seven tons of the red great chips in the dest again this is just based on what we observed in the sample there's a lot of material if you just look at the red material alone it's about one third the mass of the reg rate chips which works out to about nine tons of active thurmont material a very rough estimate and as i must emphasize our conclusion is that we have found a very energetic highly engineered explosive  pyrotechnic material in the world trade center dust in abundance the questions now are who made this stuff and why has nist refused to even look for world trade center explosive residue is also u s g s i've asked them they have to replied will they do so now now i want to foresee the questions i don't know exactly how this material was used i've given some h but i don't know it could be as we explain the paper that just the thin material survived in the thicker layers of this red material were actually used in the building the point is there's a lot of it and it should not be there in commercial building occupied by humans details of exactly how they used this to destroy can we learn once we find out who made the stuff in multi ton quantities subpoena power is needed again once you find an accelerant in this these photos thermite was found in the residues of this fire proves that there was arson there was intentional destruction that's what we have in this case we have these identified now materials in the world trade center deaths the u s government oversaw i think it's fair to say someone certainly allowed the destruction of ninety nine plus percent of the world trade center steel that evidence was destroyed we want to prevent this from happening to the world trade center dust though my concluding slash the international nine eleven truth movement and community is strong and growing we can support the new york city can see and referendum i like that new york city can do it  there could be other places like an international group of scientists to investigate the world trade center dust for example we can point people to published papers their  it requires of us courage i believe and love and truth to take action with civility and let me just say in closing just in case please get your food storage thank you like the scientific evidence obtained from crime scenes every day the scientific evidence that stephen jones team has recently uncovered is admissible in a fact finding commission or a court of law it is scientific proof of the specific weapon used to kill three thousand people