you what's the significance of nano thermite the point here is that with the discovery of a high tech active material in the words of dr fair it blows up you know when you heat it in that differential scanning calorimeter as you saw from the narrowness of the x of her it's very right at that radius high now we haven't measured everything we'd like to about it but those data we have when we compare with known nano thermite and it's very energetic and very rapid in their reaction the point is with the discovery of this high tech nano thermite we then feel that it's necessary to insist that nist look for these materials to stop pussyfooting around and refusing to look for explosives explosive residue xin the dust and secondly that we have an investigation in which we ask questions with subpoena power and find out who made this material and who placed it in the buildings and why no words we don't have to explain all the explosives that were there or exactly how they were placed what we need to find out now is who did it we have not just a smoking gun which is the gun after the bullets out but a loaded gun right it still goes off today coming up on eight years still goes up thank you isn't there more than an all star might the point is there's a lot of data points to the fact that the official story is highly suspect and has just overlooked so much data but you know there's a lot of data i think of minette as testimony which i think is very powerful about what happened the morning of died eleven in the bunker believe beneath the white house no air defenses that day and this is very strong evidence and when you put all that together i'm not saying just the nano thermite you know that's not the only thing we've got more and more and more it just keeps building and building we have plenty now we need this investigation that n y c can is seeking or something like it but i think that's a great initiative the point is that there's a great deal of information in addition to what i've discussed tonight what was silverstein's insurance scam six weeks prior to the nine eleven two thousand and one the owner slash leaseholder larry silverstein had insured these world trade center buildings against terrorist attacks after the terrorist attacks he said there was a sense or two planes we should get double the insurance money and he actually and he collected i mean he won that argument amazing but the point is again this more information i can't obviously discuss all these things and short time there's a great deal of data i just want to thank you for your fantastic work and i thank you i have read just mine of course  i have read your papers and for you if you read the latest one two or three times yes great it's excellent and the thing that i've been curious about for a long time i think with several of your found similar materials except they haven't bothered to explain them and i just wonder if you could say a few words about efforts made to discuss this with them or if they've made any effort at all to explain good question we know that it u s g s has samples of sea world trade center dust and i've written to them and asked them if they observed reg chips and they have not responded i asked this verbal e and on august twenty sixth two thousand and eight during the public what portion with mr discussion of world trade center seven i asked them if they'd look for these materials that they just kind of skipped over that they didn't even say whether they had world trade center samples or not as honest with r j levy i have spoken to one of the principal scientists by telephone long it was bright this bright orange color i thought it as wild look at that and i thought it course early on there might be pain but it turns out to have all these other characteristics anyway called r j lee and i ask it to check our data and see if it's there and so i said ok let's start an e mail and i emailed her i said ok you tell me how much it'll cost and we'll come up with the funds to have you tell us  what you found these reg rate chips she never responded that was the end of that it's like you know i don't want to lose my job i don't know what was the situation there but the data are there with taxpayers so far no go but we should be and we're trying we have foia we have some pretty good people in the community who are using foia to try to extract information from these nationally funded labs federally funded i have some questions of that a very simple one and so when was this most recent paper published it was published april third of this year earlier this month on  periodical was it published in it's published in the open chemical physics journal i see and was had you have any kind of peer review from that article first we had reviewers and one of the reviewers was extremely diligent tougher reviews and i mean i published over fifty papers in scientific journals this reviewer gave us i was half a dozen pages of comments and questions and very good review probably at this time you haven't had opportunity for many to publish any review of your work so there's not going to just a blurb or two now to begin with but nothing of in new hampshire and his work will is confirmatory confirms our principle results and it will be published and he wrote to me that he would like to do d s c studies also he hasn't done that has been able to get his hands on a d s c so that will be published soon it is confirmatory and by the way i think it's a valid point any objections that you hear like these crazy is really quite a ludicrous idea that this material could somehow formed just as a building collapses you know and then you mysteriously get these red gritty remember i did it we did look at the stardust resort collapse you know read great ships it was a controlled demolition and the key bank no chips but anyway the point is you get these crazy ideas well those cannot be published but they do care in the increased doubt and i find nine non scientists minds who don't understand people who read the paper but until it's published it should not be we know that one of the major reasons of they probably did nine eleven was for the maximum especially the explosions of the two towers was the maximum psychological effect on the on the american population psyops so to speak making us all really afraid so this is the one question i wanted to ask is like would this ten second explosion of these two towers have been possible by any other means of explosives other than a nano thermite and the time factor in which this this new type of nanotechnology was invented was sometimes two thousand or so and then the brief history and was there is there a and the second was could any other explosive be involved a second question the answer is yes reemphasize that it could be that there are fact nano thermite matches as discussed in the paper that w used to set off more conventional explosives that's just one possibility again i the house we won't know really until you can speculate all you want until you find out the who what you get the who's done it who done it then you can ask them and find out how they did it it may take some enhanced interrogation techniques which i do not favor and sedately but you know maybe there is a  there could do that could have been used a long way authority knighted by super thermite now let me say though the ten said it we talked about free fall for building seven which nist admitted the ten seconds for the towers is it's really hard to get the exact number there because of all the dust so that's but that's not a real crucial issue the crucial issue is what is this red stuff doing in such quantities in the world trade center dust how does it get there do you remember these publications they empty at publication for example showed that the research went back about a decade and this was a conference discussing nano ther nano composite materials that conference was held april two thousand once again that's before nine eleven but the same report says that that goes back a decade earlier work on these nanomaterials that put you to about nine hundred ninety one plenty of time before two thousand and one that is nine eleven two thousand also the ability to make large quantities of nano  several years ago in oakland california a gasoline tanker truck collided with a support column exploded and caused the freeway overpass to collapse and some people in conversations suggest that you know as an example of how airplanes could have caused the buildings to collapse you have any comments on that now again wild hand waving which cannot be published in a peer a future let's look at this photo april thirtieth two thousand and seven oakland one section failed it did not explode it was a tanker as you say caught fire and burned intensely and as you look at the photo can you see that there is one section that's intact and then the next section has fallen and what happened was there was a failure such that  appears that the bolts actually broke because the best explanation i have seen in the analysis of this but this was a partial collapse the structure below did not fail this is unlike the towers this is what we would expect however from the towers had it just been fire that brought them there was causing the damage in other words with other fires like this when you get a piece of the structure that  intense fire that can happen bolts fit failing for example but you don't expect the whole power just to give up and certainly not in the way that we have observed with these enormous  clouds form to and then you know bone and beams hurled to six hundred feet horizontally so taken together we can expect a partial collapse so the oakland collapse actually supports  view that the official story is wrong because it is a partial collapse not a complete collapse whereas the towers and building seven were complete collapses again and this could not explain the complete total collapse of the towers you see the difference so this becomes a point in our favor when viewed properly i just hate it when there is this hand very well look at collapsible that explains the towers what if you looked at the data you know that this is a plane the red rate chips for example you know could be published because it's just not a complete argument when you are not as he's really scientifically and it's great but my muslims really didn't do this this is a sensitive point but i think a very good point and it's in the first paper that i wrote and it's one of those points that for which i got the most criticism i'll tell you frankly there was one professor at b y u said you've got to get that sentence out of your paper and the sentence was that this event has been blamed unfairly on muslims to that effect you can read it and i feel that's very strong and that it's just so unfair and they've been proud of the muslim people i know muslims i have friends you know they're good family loving people my friends they're great i think they're wonderful and to have this blame this horrendous event when in fact the official story is a lie is just totally i just have i don't have words for it it's like a crime against humanity is what it is like it is how do you ignite you know thermite these are there's a photo it's in a los alamos publication there's the reference down there applications include triggering explosives for demolition this is right out of the los alamos report the super thermite electric match is set off with electricity you see a lecture well it's perhaps for a radio signal a radio receiver you set that off and then you could use this to trigger other explosives like c four for demolition anyway the answer is that so that's another way there may be other ways as well and those could be investigated but this is one of the ways again by los alamos national lab to trigger this super thermite to reaction with an electric pulse thanks for the question i want to thank you again for coming to a little town of sacramento it really live is this not forensic evidence or a weapon to a murderer yeah it certainly is forensic evidence c s i style and i would like to we've most of seen c s i right and they get this scientific evidence and then hand in hand with that you've got the criminal investigation right it's finding out who now when you find a smoking gun and lessers fingerprints for example you can't tell who but you can tell from the criminal investigation who by asking appropriate people and getting witnesses that's what we need now that's why we need the subpoena power that jeanette talked about in our investigation so yes this is definitely a crime scene and we do need there for a criminal investigation to accompany the scientific work that forensic science do you have any ideas as a scientist where this volume of this substance that explosive could be made potentially throughout the world and do you have any ideas about that i'm just very curious thank you so i guess as we begin our criminal investigations you first want to know who could have done it right who could've made multi ten quantities of nano thermite as i pointed article discussed the production of nano scale aluminum at indian head does anyone know where that is i'm not sure it's a name maryland thank you so that's one place to start certainly those people there would know those nine hundred ninety nine red that that began producing this nano scale material for this you know sort of large scale production i'm talking about now and  that would be a start i'm quite certain there be other places in the world that would have this i don't have all the answers as to who those are that's you know a very important best a geisha and there are people in the community the nine eleven community who are looking into that i wouldn't be surprised if russia his role china so these technologically advanced countries would have that but i don't know you have to find that out and then you start asking norman minetta insider whistle blower i think monette is one of our chief whistleblowers actually and should be commended here's what he said to the nine eleven commission and i need to emphasize this testimony of minetta was not put into the nine eleven commission report go figure you know what but it was recorded on video and so we have that and he has been asked about it since then and he insists this was indeed the plane coming toward the pentagon that was being tracked norman minetta was the secretary of transportation on nine eleven two thousand and one he went down to the  bunker underneath the white house where dick cheney was in charge and as secretary of transportation he was participating in events you remember president bush was in a elementary school in florida are reading about goats while this was going on this uprising in itself that the secret service didn't whisk him out of there you know it's a danger to the children to have this going on and he just sitting there but anyway that's another part of the story another puzzle piece but here we have in the underground bunker with cheney in charge a young man reporting to cheney as  norman that explains here we go during the time that the airplane was coming into the pentagon there was a young man who had come in and say to the vice president cheney the plane is fifty miles out  pausing at that distance there is plenty of time for air defenses their air their air force bases near washington d c it's probably the most tech tid airspace in the world we had routinely sent up planes to intercept you don't just go to shoot a commercial plane if it's off track but you do escort it and try to get it to land find out what's going on this is routine for the military they are well trained it happened over fifty times in the year prior to nine eleven nothing was done that day as you know no air defenses either for the towers or the pentagon so i hear the plane is fifty miles out he reports the vice president nothing is done plenty of time the plane is thirty miles out and when it got down to the plane is ten miles out last chance mr president vice president the young man also said to the vice president do the orders still stand here's a young man with a conscience and with some guts to challenge vice president cheney and just letting this happen but the vice president turned and whipped his neck around i can see him doing that and said of course the orders still stand have you heard anything to the contrary approximately two minutes later two hundred lives were snuffed out unnecessarily i consider that to be a peach how was the explosive applied well again this gets to the question of how there is a lot of information about access to the elevator shaft maintenance going on  the fact that one of the bush president marvin bush in charge of secure a colony in charge of security for the buildings during that period again exactly how the material was done we won't find out until you can speculate here blue in the face but you won't find out until we have an investigation which was you know power that determines who did it at that point we should have whistleblowers like secretary minetta who can tell us then how this red material was used what's it doing in the building and multi ton quantities just you see what i'm saying we need to find out who and not be dead and be distracted just because we don't know exactly how it was done how can we know that when you do a c s i investigation do you know all the details of how you know not until you find out who did it and why tell us about william rodriguez william rodriguez is a friend of mine and very good band again this is more evidence that should be brought up before the new york city commission  he was in his underground in the north tower is that right you know one of the towers north and he helped a lot of people get out of the stairwell was there there was some doors apparently there were locked and he had the key he has that key very clear evidence then of an explosion and furthermore willie indicates that when the explosion when he felt it and when he felt the plane hit i mean you know he's quite sure that the explosion took place before the plane hit the tower it's quite sure that so that's not you know hard physical evidence but the man's flesh hanging up his arm that is physical evidence of explosive force in the basement of the towers early on very early on how were the demolitions control probably radio controlled in other words we showed you the super  thermite matches which can be set off to explode and turn explode other explosives with with an electric signal this could be from a radio receiver you send a certain frequency to that you set off the explosive in that way so the radio signal could be sent from anywhere i mean there are so many buildings in new york city that would qualify and it also could have been done from a plane or a healer copter i mean there  program into your computer ok i want this sequence i want the explosions to start near near where the plane went in for the tower and then you know time later ok we've got time to program we just want the explosions to start near where the plane went in again so it looks like that caused all this you know destruction no temper but you know shuff exploding but again with a radio controlled set of signals going out and that in turn controlled by a computer it could have been done anywhere and requiring just you know one two three people finally two to initiate that explosion sequence to bring the buildings down will you notice the towers were not a conventional demolition this was not bottom up it was top down we have seen other examples richard gage shows now examples of top down demolitions i think the nine eleven truth community has made it very clear that the consensus is this was not a conventional demolition and nano thermite is not a conventional explosive but it is certainly as we saw in the crypt board quite capable of being used as a shaped charge and useful for demolition as these reports out of the national labs  that tonight as we are starting i notice that this clip here which is the fall of the collapse of building seven world trade center seven as you notice it dips in the middle fall straight down and very an inferno for about twenty four hours it did not collapse and indeed there has been no example at least and then before nine eleven two thousand and one where a fire has caused a building to collapse completely so this is a but that is in fact the official explanation of the collapse of building seven that it was due to fire now this is a controlled demolition with explosives different views this is in norway slow as i recall and shows again the straight down rapid collapse using explosives so it's not n say let's get that straight that this looks like it could be a controlled demolition due to explosives i hope you would agree that it least there is some comparison here that looks fairly similar to in the collapse of world trade center seven and this which of course is done by explosives the outline is on your notes as well and see how we're doing i'll start with physics i'm quite comfortable with talking about the physics i've studied it discussed it with many scientists and engineers in the last several months i find it quite fascinating that will then talk about the highly toxic dust and so on so you can see where we are i maintain that we are engaged in gauged in a struggle for liberty and truth right now and  on the afternoon of nine eleven now it's important to realize that building seven here we're looking now after that both towers have collapsed looking from the plaza area over to building seven building seven was never hit by a plane in fact engineers were baffled over the collapse of this building and myself i didn't see it on the day of september eleventh when i first saw it though i thought this is very strange i mean that that building should collapse straight down and rapidly it just did not look like what i'd expect from a lot of entropy which is things topple over that's what happens when you have uncontrolled collapses this is what you expect from earthquakes in fact these buildings were toppled by earthquakes they fall over they topple over they don't fall straight down it's looking impossible to me as i do this calculation that the official theory could be corrected it violates the laws of physics in this case conservation of momentum now the nine eleven commission report they said that they would give the fullest possible account of the events surrounding nine eleven but they didn't even mention the collapse of building seven i can almost rest my case my not going to mean this is really excessive it's very suspicious and of course not good science to neglect data that's just so in your face here is so important now we're going to shift over to the towers as you can see if you while the towers are being constructed you see the central core columns forty seven steel core columns look at the size of these columns huge interconnected he points out that when we burn fire burn wood and in this case it would be office materials and jet fuel too with the jet fuel burned off very rapidly anyway when we burn ok organic materials we don't expect the determined remember this is a government lab determined that there was no evidence that any of the samples had reached temperatures above six hundred not hot enough he said when the plane hit so we design for that it's like punching a hole through a screen door doesn't really hurt much ok so i read the nist report what they do is they they do a computer simulation if you can't get actual models to fail go to the computer we're putting out these puzzle pieces you know the molten metal at the bottom of the both towers and building seven and rusty and when you look at this life the collapse of building seven straight down the rapid collapse of building seven the fact that the fires were not hot enough you know we're trying to put these pieces together and figured out here's another one of these puzzle pieces in building in building seven was the c 's uncovered undercover new york station and also offices of the department of finance and f b i and now this is a high security building it's not like you can have hijackers running in there it's cordoned off on nine eleven and start planning explosives that day now bin ladin was blamed this is interesting i think so here's some pictures another one of these you know sesame street which one of these is not like the other ok yeah and this five and i put one more in here so let's sing out which is you look at these but you've seen bin laden through the years i mean we've all seen him i'm sure which one of these just does not look choli your bin ladin seeing out the number letter ok good president bush became aware of these doubts and suspicions and mostly in the muslim world and he said it is preposterous for anybody to think that this tape was doctored best just a feeble excuse to provide weak support for an incredibly evil man well my own conclusion is that this is not bin ladin these are the puzzle pieces there are many more some of which are in our papers and  finally i'd like to point out the united states constitution provides for defense not wars of aggression there are three branches of government not one or two the  legislative branch is charged with declaring war not the president and the oversight investigations also are the responsibility of congress and i hope they will get doing it thank you  my name is richard gage a i a i've been a practicing architect for twenty years and i'm a member of the american institute of architects let's take a look at world trade center seven no it was forty seven stories tall what would have been the tallest building in thirty three of our states it was not hit by an airplane let's take a look at the evidence of world trade center seven and see how it stacks up against the typical the let's take a look and this side by side comparison with the known controlled demolition on the right did the building fall into it's own footprint pretty much so do we have demolition waves and how do these remove the columns support world here's a floor plan of building seven now to bring a building smoothly symmetrical into its own footprint without falling over what we have to do is remove the core columns because what we want to do is bring the outside of the building in on itself now this involves a high degree  precision that fire is not capable of do we have a freefall speed of collapse through the path of greatest resistance you can see second by second the building gaining downward momentum you can plot the drop distance on a graph of time and it fits the freefall curve almost perfectly what does this mean that the columns had to have been removed and removed virtually simultaneously on each floor synchronistically time so the building had no resistance virtually on the way down do we have a total dismemberment of the steel structure we had a forty seven story skyscraper compressed to four stories do we have sounds of explosions though how about kevin  from the polarized concrete watch the concrete in trained in the air racing down every street in each direction at thirty five miles an hour do we have pools of here is building seven at a and b and here is the north tower and the south tower these hot spots are thirteen hundred forty to thirty nine hundred seventy degrees these are the temperatures of the hottest office fires there was no fire on the surface of ground zero after the collapses what are we measuring here where measuring the molten metal that was seen by these first responders let's listen to john gross lead lying i'm going to leave it up to you to make your own conclusions about chemical evidence though what produced all this molten metal and what is thermite anyway thermite and incendiary used by the military thermite is a compound of iron oxide in aluminum which when ignited sustains an extreme heat reaction creating molten iron in just two seconds there might can reach temperatures over forty five hundred degrees fahrenheit quite enough to liquify steel dr stephen jones performed chemical analysis on the previously molten metal dr jones received no less than four separate of world trade center dust some of it from jeanette mckinley's apartment across the street where the windows blew in and filled her apartment with dust another sample was found like ten minutes later on the brooklyn bridge well he takes this and he puts a magnet over it and he finds that there are small particles that come up to the magnet some of them are angular some of them are round they look like this if you had thousands of cutter charges going off in the columns and beams throughout the building and they were there under this incredible pressure what you'd see is something like this tens of thousands or millions of tiny droplets what's the shape of those droplets when a liquid is dispersed like this its surface tension forms itself into almost a perfect sphere with there possibly be any a nickname did thermite pieces in the world trade center dust indeedy finds it it also comes up to the magnet from his dust samples many ships this one a sixteenth of an inch long red on one side gray on the other the red side is composed of tiny iron oxide particles and aluminum the lawrence livermore lab came out with papers only a year or two ago about this stuff the particles being so small allow for almost instantaneous ignition between the two chemicals aluminum in the iron oxide producing very explosive results he continues to study and finds additional chips that are partially ignited with silicon on one three day final propane the results coupled with the visual evidence he says at the scene such as the flowing hot liquid metal providing compelling evidence that thermite reaction compounds were deliberately place in both world trade center towers and building seven these results are documented in a peer reviewed journal let's listen to what feynman did conclude because it is interesting evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel including rapid oxidation sulfa de sion and subsequent enter granular melting very interesting remember office fires don't melt steel what melted the steel capable of turning a solid steel girder endace with cheese like this former wide flange column from the structural steel in building seven now they document this very carefully in their appendix c i believe we've shown that building seven matches all of the features of controlled demolition in the classic