your reaction to th intended to be two to use because they are not two to use they are actually as said and in and this is can be proved by the historical relationship between the design of this one zionist and a jew and the designer of this one who was not i don't think a jew however he was very much a freemason and very much associated with the the tremendous influence the jury had at the end of nineteenth century and all of this stems from that because many people think that this limbic logo is coming from ancient greece because the of the count the concept of the olympics is ancient societies and it's particularly interesting and why i say that it's upstaging the lympics both this logo and that logo because it's not only iran that needs to take an interest and all the muslim all the muslim countries should actually boycott this this logo because of its race apprentices idea but so should the europeans because the thing i wish to try and point out is that iran and the best of the west which is hardly anything at all but the best of the west share the same ancient greek tradition we share the idea of scientific attitude with wisdom it's in the koran it's in you continued it when we went into our middle ages as it's called iran continued with the influence of the greek attitude the virtues of temperance scientific attitude of wisdom dud and this is what we wish the west would read again for itself it is lost due to this tremendous influence of zionism you know culture to actually  is being occupied by this kind of logo because the decidedly jewish and decided brown the wife of goodin brown the prime minister in waiting started her career involved all the ins so there is a very much bigger story here than meets the eye but thank goodness iran has drawn attention and i'm very pleased to see that the daily mail dubious as it is for giving us much of the truth nevertheless has followed up on the story and they will very much regret having done  so now this man just by the way was also the designer for this for the jewish museum in berlin i mean if you look at the the aerial here the aerial view is because as gordon brown said in the knesset he thought he was doing a great favor him smiling up to the knesset but actually he did the very opposite to what they like he said that the world jewry has the greatest outreach the greatest influence in the world thinking he was telling them what they wanted to hear but actually they like to do it by hidden hand so he was not actually and there and therefore he had certain demise in consequence of his exposing what they don't like i mean the concept of israel being the talmud that all books of the jews made manifest is not the way the jury likes to operate they like to operate underneath and not overtly as the mossad motto make war by way of deception i wanted to say actually where my expertise in the sense comes from because it confucius said signs and symbols rule the world not words and laws it's also from my point of view that i have acted in television commercials all of my life so i know the into an international competition came by this frenchman called corbett on in one thousand eight hundred nine as i say the end of the nineteenth century was a big ferment of power for jewish operatives very important because their first world zines congress by which they decided to conquer palestine is the blueprint as we know for it for what is taking place in the culling of the palestinians their genocide was actually very much a top freemason and a little bit later on he was the man who actually designed this logo which was not part of the greek classical tradition at all so here again we see este freemasonry jewish supremacist race idea from that logo in one thousand nine hundred in the beginning of the twentieth century to this logo in the twenty first century thousand and twelve so clearly that would be the two zero one two but two zero one two are for specific objects that all so they shouldn't be need for anything else but you can see quite clearly in the center there is a fifth object so on the face of it that doesn't make sense and none of this has been articulated in the mainstream media so ok so focal explain ok now interestingly enough there was a newspaper recently on the first of march this is an evening standard which is seen by very many millions of people in london and it makes it clear this is the evening standard russian publisher is jewish and the hitting is iran threatens to boycott two thousand and twelve games over quote racist so they insisted the four hundred thousand pound logo in other words a million dollars was the cost made up of supposedly four jagged figures but we say that five on there represents the year two thousand and twelve nothing else which is merely a symbolic number into a religious city the important thing is the rings what do they represent and going back to this one it's crucial to understand their five in number that gives it a cultic the satanic number which links to the pentagram ok so anyone who's involved in satanism or in witchcraft anything which is totally anathema to what you believe in your country of them of model ethical spiritual dimension it has a  any practices in satanism carried out with a pentagram and that links to the cardinal directions so we see this very clearly in these rings that saturn rings or satanic rings which also has a linkage t freemasonry ok as this connects to the new testament and also to the old testament because the structure of them is four plus one because in the old testament you have genesis  structure you have exactly the same here and here you have the green rain which represents no the red green which represents south the yellow ring which represents east and the blue ring represents west but the crucial ring is to do with what is the intention now the intention is it white witchcraft was in black witchcraft it's made very clear this is  of satanic witchcraft so the black ring is in the center and that links to the universality of the secular entity and one of the crucial aspects which i think your viewers would be interested to politics he controls law but crucially he didn't call he controls banking and the city of london the square mile ok and that is exactly the same in the united states washington and you have private entities in the united states which are run by those that control the central bank of the united states such as the council of foreign relations so it comes as no surprise that the president and the vice president invariably and of course the secretary of state invariably tend to be in the high teens because you have to be invited into it of the council for foreign relations and they determine foreign policy such as what's going to happen say in north africa or what's going to happen in iran and it's crucial to be aware of involvements called council for foreign relations another point needs to be borne in mind is never ever hear who see in the british media all in the united states media it's off limits while the thing is i mean is the same many people of made comments they th ink it's on the lever ball anybody could be paid a million dollars for coming up with something like that and at the time all the main news papers made comments back in two thousand and seven four years ago the fact that a child could have come up without and is not very difficult if you do some research to see what the newspapers had to say about it those who are scathing but having said that that does not explain the agenda which is why that logo had to be the chosen logo because it has all the components necessary to make a very very subtle  cultic point morning colleagues this way congress is considering two pieces of legislation relating to iran the first undermines a diplomatic solution with iran and lowers the bar for war the second authorizes a war of choice against iran and begins military preparations for it with respect to h red five sixty eight which eliminates the most viable alternative to war the house is expected to vote on this i would urge members to read the resolution because section six rejects any u s policy that would rely on efforts to contain nuclear weapons capable around section seven urges the president to reaffirm the unacceptability of an iran with nuclear weapons capability and opposition to any policy that would rely on containment as an option in response to iranian enrichment now this language represents a significant shift in u s policy and would guarantee that talks with iran currently scheduled for may twenty third would fail current u s policy is that iran cannot acquire nuclear weapons instead five sixty eight draws the red line for military action at iran achieving a nuclear weapons capability capability a nebulous and undefined term that would include a civilian nuclear program ind it's likely that a negotiated deal to prevent a nuclear armed iran and to prevent war would provide for a rainy an enrichment for peaceful purposes under the framework of the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons treaty with strict safeguards and inspections this language in this bill makes such a negotiated settlement impossible at the same time language lowers the threshold for attacking iran countries with nuclear weapons capability could include many other countries like japan or brazil it is an unrealistic threshold former secretary of state colin powell has stated that this resolution quote this is in a an associate of colon polyps stated that this resolution quote reads like the same sheet of music that got us into the iraq war unquote now house resolution forty three ten the national defense authorization act authorizes war with against iran and preparing the military for it i want to point out how this happens well h read five sixty eight undermines our diplomatic efforts and lowers the bar for war h r forty three ten the n d a begins military preparations for war members ought to read this section twelve twenty one makes military action against iran a us policy section twelve twenty two directs our armed forces to prepare for war if you read the sections you'll see that what i'm saying is true now  the the under subsection a it says that iran may soon attain a nuclear weapons capability a development that would threaten the united states interest to stabilize the region encourage nuclear proliferation and further empower  iran and on and on but the international atomic energy agency as well as the u s and israeli intelligence have all agreed that iran does not currently have a nuclear bomb is not building a nuclear weapon and does not have any plans to do so both u s and israeli officials also agree that a strike on iran would only do lay their nuclear program and actually encourage them to pursue a nuclear weapons sustained diplomatic engagement with iran is the only way to ensure transparency and to prevent a nuclear armed iran rejecting or thwarting any inspections beige deal we are currently seeking with iran even when it analysts are expressed expressing guarded optimism that a new near term deal is  that all makes preemptive military action against iran more likely now could i ask how much i have been looking gentleman is one minute remaining ok i just want to cite some provisions further this is right from the bill in order to prevent iran from developing nuclear weapons which they are not doing the nuclear the united states in cooperation with his allies much utilize all elements of national power including diplomacy robust economic sanctions and credible get this visible preparations for a military option under section twelve twenty two where they talk about u s military preparedness it talks of pre positioning sufficient supplies of aircraft munitions fuel and other materials for both air and sea based missions under subsection b it talks about maintaining sufficient sufficient naval assets in the region get this to launch a sustained see an air campaign against a range of iranian nuclear and military targets now come on we're getting ready for war against iran why i mean we ought to have a broad debate about this other than just burying this section of a bill and the national defense authorization act we have plenty of evidence there's no reason to go to war against iran we made the mistake in iraq let's not make another one over the ran and set off world war three does anybody else have this problem of channel comments disappearing on that channel page is the latest example i was trying to reply to this comment and as you can see my reply just disappear is so i had a break it up and this is the way i actually had to post it one line if that the other and this is an important point iran has given specific examples like the former soviet union when they explained they are not talking about attacking anyone see the link in the video description where i quote medina chod where he's using the soviet union example of a vanishing vanishing meaning it's not attacked it's a change of the political system he's referring to a medina judge tried to explain in detail how he is talking about political change and he talked about the solution being voting for the region change but c b s edited his call for democracy out of the interview so i've been over this in my other video i showed how even if you want to interpret what he said as a threat let's say for argument's sake it's a threat you don't feel manipulated by the media when they withhold these other statements isn't this newsworthy where he's talking about democracy and peaceful options right if you want to believe the other thing was true then this is a story because it contradicts that and several a rainy and officials have repeatedly made clear that they had not threatening to attack israel so they misrepresent the initial statement and then they withhold things that contradict that misrepresentation you're being manipulated you're being manipulated into another war which could unleash horrors that could spiral