job as you can see behind me the building seven is clearly visible right behind the reporter it wasn't until five twenty eastern time that it came down buildings four five and six maintained heavy damage from falling debris from the towers and yet they remained standing in madrid spain this building burned for nearly twenty four hours a raging inferno and it didn't fall building seven received minimal damage and suffered only a minor fire and yet it collapsed the collapse of a concrete and steel structure due to a fire had never happened before september eleventh so how did the b b c know ahead of time that it was to come down unless the cover story that had been prepared for public consumption had been released in this case a little too early i don't think there's any disagreement in the nine eleven research community that one of the strongest arguments that challenges the official story is the issue of controlled demolitions there are multiple video angles there are photographs there is witness testimony explaining that there were bombs and explosions going off in and around the trade center there is scientific data all supporting the charge that these buildings were brought down by demolition charges well if that's the case we have to ask the question what role did the planes play there are those out there that get very upset when we talk about pods or flashes or substituted planes well if these planes were indeed hijacked that would mean that the hijackers would either have to be a in collusion with those that had placed the charges in the north tower the south tower and in building seven one of the most secure buildings in new york city if not the most secure building well if it couldn't have been collusion with the only other option is coincidence the hijackers just to fly the planes into buildings that were scheduled to be demolished just minutes later well if it can't be collusion and it can't be coincidence then how could it have been terrorists all of a sudden the concept of flashes and pods and substituted planes becomes more plausible and it doesn't conflict with the idea of controlled demolitions but in fact supports the contention that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions the countless reports of bombs and explosions going off in and around the world trade center were completely ignored by the nine eleven commission and downplayed by the mainstream media william rodriguez his testimony before the nine eleven commission was completely deleted or shall i say censored why is there such an effort to suppress information and evidence that might challenge the official story why do government officials and the media consistently try to ridicule or discredit those that would be in the best position to shed light on these irrefutable facts let's take a look now at what happened at the pentagon and see if the same methodology has come to play no at a speed and at a point in the structure that was able to cause massive fire and explosion and take out that large swatch of the pentagon that we all saw on the news right plane a very big jet was flying and unusual pattern near the white house or the park very slowly it made one circle and then we have not seen it  the official story of flight seventy seven tells us that this plane waltzed all over the eastern united states and turned around over ohio at thirty thousand feet came back and hit the pentagon and by nine thirty seven in the morning this was after eight forty six the world trade center had been hit virtually almost an hour after the world trade center had been hit and an hour and a half after the first multiple signs of multiple hijackings we're told this plane just waltzed into the most protected airspace in the world a the most protected building the biggest military headquarters on the planet this is already highly improbable mine and my professional opinion based on my years of experience my study of airline accidents and incidents it's my opinion that a boeing seven fifty seven did not hit the pentagon there would be an abundance of wreckage and that the official sources have not been able to produce the evidence of any wreckage large tell sections indestructible landing here indestructible engines wing seat's anything of the sort indicates to me that a seventy seven did not hit the pentagon in relation to the pentagon it's quite obvious that no but when the seven fifty seven hit the building there are multiple lines of reasoning that support that conclusion including for example the complete lack of massive debris of the kinds of character that would be expected from a hundred ton airliner with a hundred twenty five foot wingspan in a tail that stands forty four feet above the ground the hit point was tail not even the engines were recovered indicating that no boeing seven fifty seven hit the building you've got a hole that's no more than ten foot high and about maybe fifteen to twenty feet wide that we're expected to believe a multi turned seven fifty seven jetliner with the wing span of one hundred twenty five feet the tail had the forty four feet that's four stories folks somehow managed to squeeze one little mini hole in the ground floor of the pentagon before the other wall collapsed which for about forty five minutes after initial impact there was only off one hole about fourteen to sixteen feet and supposedly the seven fifty seven completely penetrated th sticking to the windows going to are completely intact both adjacent where the wing should have penetrated and knocked the windows out and also directly above the hole or the elevated tail section would have penetrated you know the one is are completely intact  i measure pieces of soviet equipment from photographs was my job i look at the hole in the pentagon and i look at the size of an airplane there was supposed to hit the pentagon and i said the plane does not fit in that hole so what did hit the pentagon what did where is what's going on a boeing seven fifty seven has a wingspan of nearly one hundred twenty five feet a length of one hundred fifty five feet and a height of forty four and a half feet as was reported if the plane was flying over five hundred mph common sense would dictate there would be some indication any indication of an impact of the tail section in the upper floors in addition the heaviest and most massive parts of an aircraft of this type would be the engines if there were to be any holes at all they would be located where the engines would have impacted the pentagon e in january of two thousand and four released its pentagon building performance report and along with that a video computer analysis of what happened when the mysterious flight eleven supposedly slammed into the pentagon let's take a look at the report what significant information was overlooked in this video from the american society of civil engineers well first of all the eighteen and a half inch steel reinforced concrete wall was omitted secondly you'll note that when the tail section enters the pentagon it remains intact how is this possible that the tail section over forty four feet in height could have remained intact as it entered the pentagon and left no entry point as a seen in this photograph thirdly and most significant of all is that this plane has no engines in this computer graphic model despite these omissions the a s e claimed that the plane took out fifty support columns in this photograph do you see support columns that have been destroyed at the world trade center towers we were told that the fuel fires burning from the planes were so hot that they melted steel and collapse the buildings in a pancake fashion high up in both towers the raging fires were not generating three to five times the heat of  nuclear power plant if this were true for the world trade center towers wouldn't the same heat have been generated at the pentagon when we look at the photographs on page three thirteen of the nine one one commission report what we see is that to the north side the left side of the impact area that the walls on all fours are totally intact the inner office walls are intact we see no fire damage as evidenced by the books not burning the computer intact the other things on the office intact so when we go back and see the official pentagon performance report it is sad that the aircraft sliced in taken all the while structures all the support beams well the last ruptures are there the support beams are intact so there again the official report is contradicted by the photographic and video evidence other than the sixteen foot hole in the earring of the pentagon one of the most damning pieces of evidence to suggest an official cover up is an examination of the official flight path of american airlines flight seventy seven the flight data recorder information recovered in the pentagon wreckage shows the precise speed altitude and heading of the aircraft that we were told was flight seventy seven if we examine the direction that flight seventy seven took on its approach to the pentagon will note that the flight path is slightly different from that of the official report this may seem insignificant first but how do we account for the light poles that were knocked down even though they were not directly in the path of flight seventy seven secondly if we take a look at the altitude of the aircraft we'll know that mere moments before flight seventy seven was to have impacted with light pole number one and li pole number two it was still two hundred and thirty five feet in the air how is it possible that flight seventy seven could have knocked over these light poles while it was at such a high altitude thirdly if we take a look at light poles three and four will note that they are outside of the flight path of flight seventy seven as well how did these light poles come down following the flight path of the n t s b as model of the flight data for american airlines flight seventy seven we can see the flight path highlighted in red note that the plane passes over a light pole that should have been knocked to the ground but remained standing after the event would explain this anomaly is it possible that the plane that impacted with the pentagon was smaller than a commercial boeing seven fifty seven after reviewing the photographs and the video footage taken at the pentagon before the collapse of the outer to ring the experts that we've discussed this with scientists researchers physicists airline pilots and military experts all agree that the damage seen is absolutely inconsistent with a seven fifty seven having struck the pentagon it is more consistent however with a smaller jet aircraft hitting the pentagon possibly a small jet or a u s navy an  vehicle or maybe a global hawk missile in this photograph that was taken at the pentagon we clearly see some sort of an engine rotor but the question is is this a rotor from a seven fifty seven a rolls royce engine well according to john w brown the spokesperson for rolls royce engines in indianapolis he states it's not apart from any rolls royce engine that he's familiar with it's clear that there's been a concerted effort to cover up information to distract and to deceive the american people and indeed the people of the world as to what happened at the pentagon on september eleventh with this in mind is it not possible that those behind this conspiracy could have removed evidence that would have challenge the official story and is it not inconceivable that evidence could have been planted to support the official story i know from my experience that it would have been highly improbable that even a seasoned american test pilot a military test pilot could have flown one eighty category aircraft like the seven fifty seven into the first floor of the pentagon because of a thing called ground effect the official trajectory has this plane just skimming the ground at about five hundred miles an hour as it impacts with the building on the ground floor that turns out to be aerodynamically impossible even a small plane such as assassin at full throttle with it accumulate a packet of compressed gas which is there beneath the fuselage that would make it impossible for it to get closer than fifteen feet to the ground discussions where they are not evil engineers have convinced me that for a boeing seven fifty seven at five hundred miles an hour it could not get closer than sixty feet to the ground if the plane had been taking the official trajectory its engines would have been making massive damage to the to  wake turbulence would have been racking it the lawn would have been a mess instead the lawn is perfectly smooth green and smooth which turns out to be ironically a smoking gun at the pentagon ground effect and the pristine condition of the lawn in front of the pentagon aren't the only problems with the official story the airline pilots that we talked with also have a very serious problem as to whether or not terrorists that were trained on small aircraft were even capable of maneuvering a large commercial airliner at such a high speed and making these very precise maneuvers i flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in nine eleven the flight number one seventy five in flight ninety three the seven fifty seven that allegedly went on to shanksville and flight one seventy five is the aircraft that's alleged to have hit the south tower i don't believe it's possible for like i said for a terrorist so called terrorist to train out of one seventy two of them jump in the cockpit of a seven fifty seven seven sixty seven glass cockpit and vertical navigate the aircraft lateral navigate the out of the sky i couldn't do it and i'm absolutely positive they couldn't do it what's unusual about the five frames of the pentagon released is they don't show a plane streaking across the pentagon lawn they just show a white favre trail the the date in the time on the pentagon frames is wrong you know it one of the most secure buildings in the world and at the bottom of these five frames they have the word playing it's like subliminal you know the word is there but the plane isn't the pentagon is the nerve center of the u s military when it comes to u s security all roads lead to the pentagon surveillance would obviously be the first step in maintaining safety and security take a look at your local wal mart and count the closed circuit video cameras surveiling the parking lot video cameras can be seen everywhere in our society are we to believe that the world's most secure building was only capable of capturing the event on video from two cameras at one location i took over the flight themselves and down the playing field i want to get quickly to chris connect he is a photographer with the pittsburgh affiliate a fox affiliate he was back there just a couple of minutes ago and chris i've seen the pictures it looks like there's nothing there except for a hole in the ground basically that's right the only thing you could see from where we were was a big algae in the earth and some broken trees we could see some people walking walking around in the area but from where we could see there wasn't much left of any large pieces of debris at all now there was nothing nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed or smoke fire nothing it was absolutely quiet it was actually very quiet nothing going on down there no smoke no fire just a couple of people walking around and looked like part of the n t s b crew walking around looking at the pieces how big would you say that hole was from my estimates i would guess it was probably about twenty to fifteen feet in shanksville one of the things that's really remarkable is the associated press said that all the wreckage that was recovered from the whole scene could fit in the back of a single pickup truck in a few plastic bags no there's just no way a big plane like that just completely disintegrates or root you know reduces itself down to practically nothing the debris here is spread over a three to four mile radius which has now been completely sealed off and is being treated according the f b i as a crime scene that's really all you see is a large crater in the ground and just a tiny tiny bits of debris there is going to be fun reports that the investigators out there and there are hundreds of them that i said tonight have found nothing larger than a phone but there are lots of oddities about flight ninety three is a colonel nelson has observed to me it looked to him as though a bulldozer had been taken a ditch and been dogs and been filled with trash and blown up i had residents of the area call me to say that they told the f b i they heard an explosion in the air before they heard any impact with the ground but the f b i refused to write it down i have anyone i have a former inspector general for the air force responsible for the conduct of air crash investigations tell me that if the plane had crashed as advertised the debris should have been scattered over an area approximately one city block in size in fact just distributed over eight square miles which is a scenario consistent with the plane having been shot down in the air but not one that crashed well i would definitely say after having looked at some of the video face that i would have to remove myself from the quote lever category and i i can't say that i would be a dyed in the wall skeptic but there's enough information presented to cast some real doubt on the story as it's been presented and now with a lot of questions coming into my mind related to that the pentagon along with building then all i've ever seen like most of the general public is a blurry image proportionally to be a plane taken by a security camera hitting the side of the building but so blurry that you can't really see what's going on so yes i would say based on the that i just saw yes i would have some real serious doubts and questions about the pentagon story others a lot of information has been manipulated in that and that we haven't been shown is as  on may seventeenth of two thousand and six the pentagon announced that one p m that day they would release new footage that they claimed would clearly show flight seventy seven hitting the pentagon in anticipation of the release of this new footage here of phillips on c interview jamie mcintyre who is the c n n senior pentagon correspondent during this interview here phillips asked jamie mcintyre what his thoughts were on some of the ideas that something other than flight seventy seven had hit the pentagon having been there on september eleventh having seen the plane wreckage and photographed it myself personally i can tell you that that's nonsense i had a camera with me i took pictures of some of the wreckage some of the parts of the fuselage of part of the cockpit until they told us we had to move back away from the scene after hearing jamie mcintyre's statements with kara phillips in this interview we couldn't help but realize that they were inconsistent with his original live report at the pentagon on september eleventh let's take a look and listen carefully to what he said on that day from my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the pentagon the only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in and as i said the only pieces  left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand there are no large tail section sections fuselage nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the pentagon after realizing the blatant contradiction of jamie mcintyre's statements on september eleventh and the statements that he had made on kira phillips's interview we decided to put out a news release on may eighteenth in this news release we quoted jamie mcintyre statement on september eleventh and the statement made on cura phillips as news broadcast as a result i received a phone call from c n n headline news i was invited to be a guest on the glenn beck program which is aired daily on that channel they had asked me to come on the program to discuss some of the controversies and conspiracy theories about what had happened at the pentagon on september eleventh now realizing that despite the fact that they were very friendly and professional on the telephone this was not going to be a very friendly interview let's take a look at this interview and you decide whether this is journalism or propaganda sure they're fun they help us keep that dream alive that someday we really will walk on the moon and that next christmas your stocking could be stuffed with an auv this comeback album actually some art so ever since nine eleven a bunch of serious otherwise known as people with active imaginations no common sense and a lot of  time on their hands have insisted that explosives inside the world trade center brought the towers down that all the victims in the first plane really didn't die because there were no passengers and no plane ever hit pentagon as yourself this question does this sound like an introduction for an investigative piece of journalism with an honest desire to get to the truth or does this sound more like an ad hominum hit piece with a design to discredit and ridicule the messenger rather than address the issues and the evidence presented there's a documentary you can't get off of or you can get off of a website but for some reason they are not letting a bided blockbuster and now available is a director's cut that insist all of it is a hoax on kleist you produced it tell me sir how is this not a plane right there can we freeze that and sh that box how is that not a plane that's either a that's a big wide object of some sort that's either that's right it's either a plane or a naked michael moore headed for the buffet glenn beck you're absolutely right and you've just proven my point this photograph does show something it's either a plane or a naked michael moore heading for the buffet table but it could also be an a three sky warrior jet or a global hawk missile the fact is this photograph shows something but it proves nothing and yet jamie mcintyre on c n n yesterday stated that he had photographed pieces of the cockpit and the fuselage and jamie mcintyre also stated on september eleventh that upon his close inspection there were no pieces of recognizable wreckage from any type of a large aircraft he stated that there was no fuselage there were no wings no engines nothing that you could recognize as a large aircraft or what's in area fifty one is it aliens or office supplies the desperate attempt to somehow link me to aliens and elvis comeback album to nosed osama and area fifty one is nothing more than another example of how ridiculous and condescension are utilized in a last ditch effort to somehow draw attention away from evidence and information that is damning to the conventional wisdom of the official story now many of the listeners may have bought into this ploy but to those with the ability to recognize it it was nothing more than an assault on the evidence and information and an insult to the families who lost loved ones on september eleventh jamie mcintyre appeared on anderson cooper's three sixty program in what appeared to be a damage control interview obviously cockpit now let's listen to jamie mcintyre's live report again on september eleventh from my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the pentagon the only site  actual site of the building that's crashed in and as i said the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand there are no large tail section wing sections fuselage nothing like that anywhere around it appears that the only person taking jamie mcintyre's statements out of context is jamie mcintyre and i think we need to make explicit with clear who she is embracing there are only two websites that deal with nine eleven that she has linked to on her own blog one of them is called the name and the other one is the scholars for nine eleven building and if you really want to have an honest discussion and debate there barbara walters i dare to put on the editors of popular mechanics to set the people straight about what exactly how much popular mechanics magazine published this article in their march two thousand and five edition it was untitled d bunking the myths of nine eleven and in regard to what they reported at the pentagon they stated when american airlines flight seventy seven hit the pentagon's exterior wall it created a hole approximately seventy five feet wide according to the american society of civil engineers pentagon building performance report the exterior facade collapsed about twenty minutes after impact but a s c e based its measurements of the original hole on the number of first floor support columns that were destroyed or damaged oh let's back up the article states when american airlines flight seventy seven hit the pentagon eat it created a hole approximately seventy five feet wide but according to the photographs and the video footage taken before the collapse of the outer ring it's clear to see that the hole certainly was not seventy five feet wide it was the collapse itself the created the seventy five foot wide hole according to the photographs and video footage that was shot before the collapse of the outer ring and yet the popular mechanics magazine doesn't mention the collapses occurring until twenty minutes after impact so how can it be both ways either flight seventy seven hit the pentagon and created a seventy five foot wide hole or it didn't the photographs and video footage clearly show that there was no seventy five foot wide hole and that the collapse itself created the hole that they're referring to this type of reporting is disingenuous and misleading to say the least and at this point in time james meigs the editor of popular mechanics magazine has refused to debate or discuss this issue one of the most controversial and divisive issues in regard to the quest for truth about what happened on september eleventh is the issue as to whether or not there was any extra equipment attached to the belly of the plane that was reported to have been flight one seventy five the popular mechanics magazine of march two thousand and five quoted their expert ronald greeley he was the director of the space photography laboratory at arizona state university and is an expert at analyzing images to determine the shape and features of geological formations based on shadow and light effects grilli dismissed the notion that there was a photo that revealed a pod in fact according to popular mechanics magazine the photo reveals only the bowings right fairing a pronounced bulge that contains the landing gear grilli concluded that sunlight glistening off the fairing gave it an exaggerated look however on the art bell show ben chertoff who is the science researcher for pop happens from from from the video and it has turned into this question how could the pod have been created by sunlight according to ronald grilli and shadow according to ben chart off at the same the most valuable commodity to a newsman is his credibility and i don't take lightly investigating what happened on nine eleven because it could end up being one of the biggest crimes ever perpetrated in american history we've seen several examples of how the media has massaged manipulated and created stories to mislead the american people and the people of the world the b b c reporting twenty five minutes before it happened that building seven had collapsed  despite the fact that never in history had a steel structure collapsed as a result of a fire and yet they reported it before it happened how did they know we seen jamie mcintyre reverse his own testimony that he gave  september eleventh claiming that those reporting had taken his words out of context we've seen glenn beck utilizing propaganda techniques in an attempt to discredit and ridicule and the gate real information we've seen a v in new york city interviewing william rodriguez on september eleventh of two thousand and six where they took his testimony where he described the explosion below him and made it sound as though he was describing the explosion of the plane hitting above ever since september eleventh talk show hosts on radio and television have discussed these events some supportive and some challenging the official story there are those however that utilize what some call thug journalism a technique of talking over ridiculing discrediting and insulting the gast in an attempt to make them look silly let's take a look at an example of journalism at work in this example bill o'reilly on the o'reilly factor was interviewing professor james who challenges the official story we timed this interview and in this six minute and twenty second television piece mr o'reilly talked for five minutes and one second where the guest professor fetzer only spoke for one minute and seventeen seconds the concept of host versus guest seems to have escaped mr o'reilly in real journalism a high most will ask a question and the guest is allowed to respond at that point the host can engage the guest in a conversation and a debate of the issues this was certainly not the case in this interview with professor fetzer you're like the guys who think that the space aliens kidnapped elvis or something like that that's the that's where you are you're nuts we're professor fetzer at every opportunity in an attempt to take away any credibility that professor fetzer may have had this is not journalism but it has however become standard operating procedure on many talk shows those that do have evidence and information to challenge the official story are very rarely allowed to present that information there has to date been no open and honest discussion and presentation of evidence and information that challenges the official story it seems that the only ammunition that these talk show hosts have is to insult and ridicule the messengers because they desperately want to avoid the evidence and the message itself in this video documentary we've heard from experts and seen video footage and photographs that challenge whether or not the planes that hit the north and south towers were actually commercial aircraft we've seen video footage and photographs and again heard from experts that challenge what happened at the pentagon on september eleventh we've seen video footage and reporters accounts of what happened in shanksville pennsylvania and regard to flight ninety three the fact that there was no recognizable wreckage and a crater only fifteen feet across we've also examined video and photographs of the collapse of the buildings in new york city we've seen how the mainstream media has twisted distorted and fabricated information we've seen how they've attacked ridiculed demonized and discredited anyone who dared challenge the official story of september eleventh with all this information that challenges the official story we have to ask the question is there any evidence that supports the official story on september twenty third of two thousand and one congolese or rice held a news conference and she stated we have definitive proof and evidence that links osama bin laden and the taliban to the attacks on september eleventh and we will release this information in due time at the date of this production we're still waiting to see that evidence in october of two thousand and one this video was released and shown to the people of america and the world and we were all told that this was osama bin laden accepting responsibility for the attacks on september eleventh but let's compare the osama in this video to a photograph of the known osama when you compare the two you'll notice that the osama in the video has a shorter nose he also appears to be a little chubby or as the osama in the video waves his hand look carefully you'll see he's wearing a ring and a wristwatch jewelry is forbidden by people of the islamic faith you'll also notice that when he signs on this pad he's signing with his right hand we know that the real osama was left handed so we have to ask this question where did this video come from and why was it fabricated to mislead the people of america and the world if you visit the f b i dot gov website you'll find the ten most wanted list and on that list of course is osama bin laden you can pull up his wanted poster and on that poster is a list of charges that he's wanted for the curious thing is that nowhere in the list of charges is any mention of september eleventh the muckraker report contacted rex tomb a spokesperson for the f b i and asked why was there no mention of the attacks on september eleventh on osama's wanted poster mr to his response was we have no hard evidence linking osama bin laden with the attacks on september eleventh conda lisa rice and stated that they would release their information in due time ladies and gentlemen when you charge someone with conspiracy to murder three thousand people and you have no evidence to back up that charge of conspiracy that makes the charge a conspiracy theory that means that the entire war on terror is based upon fraud we've been told over and over again that this is a war on terror but is this a war on terror or a war for profit we know that there are hundreds of government contractors in iraq right now with countless contracts let's take a look at one of these government contracts a no bid contract that was awarded to halliburton the houston chronicle reported that eighty two thousand gallons of liquid propane fuel were to be transported to baghdad but they weren't going to be transported from the united states to baghdad they were going to be transported from kuwait to baghdad a distance of approximately three hundred miles i contacted a liquid propane company and asked how many trucks it would take to transport eighty two thousand gallons of fuel i was told about ten trucks i asked how much would you charge to transport those ten trucks approximately three hundred miles i was told approximately one dollar per mile per truck for a total of approximately three thousand dollars i asked if this was a government contract how much would the charge be and i was told that it would be two or three times that amount so let's say it would be ten thousand dollars the question is how much was halliburton awarded to transport this fuel the answer twenty seven point five million dollars how many of your tax dollars went to pay halliburton to transport this fuel wouldn't it have been cheaper to have ten privates drive those trucks that distance the question is how much money is coming out of the united states taxpayers dollars to pay for this war and is being funneled into the pockets of companies like halliburton is this a war for profit you decide after reviewing the video and photographic evidence the number one question that people ask is well if the plane didn't hit the pentagon where did it go if the plane that hit the south tower was in flight one seventy five then where did it go where those people are we can't answer that question and we were attempting to do so we would be engaging in conspiracy theory however consider the following scenario let's say that you have to put a loved one on a bus bound from new york to boston you put them on a greyhound bus and off it goes a couple  hours later there's a news report that claims that the greyhound bus bound from new york to boston skidded out of control crashed and exploded a couple weeks later someone who happened to be sightseeing with a camcorder shows up with a videotape of the event and upon examining that video footage we see that this bus says trailways on the side question where does a greyhound bus go well if your loved one was on that greyhound bus you'd want to know wouldn't you the next question is should we ridicule and demonize anyone who dares ask where's the greyhound bus should we likewise ridicule and demonize the person who took the video should we negate and ignore the video footage of the trailways bus simply because we don't know where the greyhound bus went well that's exactly where we are in regard to the video footage that you've seen we may never find out what happened to flight seventy seven or flight one seventy five but the video and photographic evidence screams that we need a new investigation i would like to have everybody merican get serious about being a citizen of the united states of america instead of just being in the habit and start thinking on their own because nine eleven is the single most important event to happen to the united states and since pearl harbor for those people who question nine eleven who maybe supported the work that the nine eleven truth community people have produced for them to lift their voices high this is supposed to be the land of the free and the home of the brave to speak brave how to get involved with your voice we can't let this stand we cannot move forward we have to leave a legacy because to shed our rights our bill of rights everything for our children even if we don't get to enjoy it in their own life we have to fight for there is some suspicion that what hit the trade centers may have been military planes might not have even been the flights we would tell forces right uses up the horrific idea that well then what happened to the poor  passengers it's one thing if they were killed as collateral damage in some sort of attack and it would be a totally different thing if they were landed somewhere offloaded and then just cold blooded the problem is we don't have the answers to all of this because there's never been a truthful investigation i would like to see another investigation and i don't know if i could go with another official investigation i think we've come far enough all the people who have  gotten volved when the nine eleven truth movement they may not be able to come up with a defended of story of what happened but i think we've got enough evidence to demolish the official story and if that's the case we need to game why are we in the middle east why did they use nine eleven as a pretext a false cause and a lie to get us involved in middle east we need we need answers to these kinds of questions the nine eleven commission report it's the biggest insult slap in the face of the american people that has ever been offered anywhere by anyone this you know david griffin called it a five hundred seventy one page lie he said there isn't the word of truth in it and he's absolutely right because truth depends on context and the entire context that's created in that book is myth and more myth that is sacred story designed to influence people's social behavior and their idea of themselves in the world but it has nothing to do with with fact you know myth can be are false if we're going to continue to call ourselves a free and democratic society there there must be answers there must be accountability somebody has to be held accountable for what actually happened on nine eleven ladies and gentlemen justice must be served the investigation into the attacks on september eleventh must be reopened and the evidence presented in an open and unbiased world televised trial so that those  these crimes be brought to justice and let the punishment fit the crime so what else can we do well the answer can be seen in our founding documents the declaration of independence states but when a long train of abuses and us pations pursuing invariably the same object even says a design to reduce them under absolute despotism it is their right it is their duty to throw off such government and to provide new guards for their future security but let's be clear no one wants to overthrow the government or abolish the constitution it was abraham lincoln who said we seek not to overthrow the constitution but we seek to overthrow those who would pervert the constitution we call on all those in uniform that took an oath to support and to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic to do just that we call on all those in law enforcement to protect and serve the people not those who pass laws that destroy our way of life and criminalize the very activities that make us a free society our unborn children will either curse our complacency or they will applaud our activism the world is watching what we do and what we don't do the choice is yours either we resign ourselves and our posterity to a world controlled by those that would murder deceive and in slave us or we rediscover our heritage reaffirm our patriotism and muster the courage to do what we know we must do if we don't we never again will be able to call ourselves the land of the free and the home of the brave we can do it we must do it and we will do it i'm dave