study conducted on the impact of genetically modified food shows that it damages organs it causes infertility it causes  it causes holes in the g i tract it causes multiple organ system failure the whole concept of genetically modified organisms destroying a monkey wrench in the life on this planet what if we could produce more yield in the same amount of lands squeeze more water from a single raindrop conserve natural resources caring for the environment monsanto's the company the told us the p c these were safe they told us that agent orange was safe they told us that he was safe and now they're in charge of telling us if they're old genetically modified foods are safe the reason why we have a hundred seventy million acres of genetically engineered kerryn and soybeans and c advantage salmon grows twice as fast as the regular salmon there has not been sufficient animal health testing human health testing or environmental impact testing of these new transgenic fish basically they've taken agriculture and built in a dust real model which doesn't fit nature so instead of changing their agricultural bottle to accommodate what is natural their changing nature to accommodate him dust robot if you have an organic corn crop that sits next to a genetically engineered corn field and it happens to tasseled the same time it happens to be downwind you're going to get your crop contaminated the rest of the food supply  and the pharmaceutical industry has no interest in having you well because they don't make any money if you're well and the pharmaceutical industry is the biotech industry some people think that g m o really means god move any scientists that looks into the to the research or the lack of research on the safety of genetically engineered food comes to the conclusion that these foods should not be on the market they need another decade or two of research monsanto's the company the told us that p c bees were safe they were convicted of actually poisoning people in their town next to the p c b factory and fired seven hundred million dollars they told us that agent orange was safe they told us the was safe and now they're in charge of telling us if their own genetically modified foods are safe because the f d a doesn't require a single safety study they leave in two months part it's all in their minds make money make money make money they're not actually making products to make health they're making money and so they tend to overlook but the health consequences i think that is a ridiculous sort of approach the problem unfortunately it's usually the other way around people in this sort of business are looking for opportunities to make money first party and then in this case maybe let somebody else worry about the health consequences maybe even the public and we have it upside down that is simply upside down why did the f d a abdicate their responsibility to protect us the white house had instructed the f d a to promote biotechnology under the first bush administration and so the f in reality the overwhelming consensus among the scientists at the f d a were not only that g m o is were different but that they were inherently dangerous that they might create allergies toxins new diseases a nutritional problem they had urge their superiors to require a long term study and when he saw drafts of the policy coming back to them they were angry and urged their political appointees to change course but michael taylor and the political appointees ignored the science ignored the scientists denied the existence of their concerns and set forth a policy that allowed g m o's to be put on the market in a way that that creates all of the press the dead did risk for human beings and the environment the f d a is composed of smart people but they're smart people with a conflict of interest they're smart people who make their decisions based on what will support their financial needs what their academic needs not what makes scientific sense what you can do with g m o's is basically engineer food in ways that make it most profitable from the company's perspective but from the company's perspective whatever negative aspects of that might exist are simply irrelevant and more than being irrelevant the company is motivated to try to suppress knowledge about those negative aspects the company is motivated to try to suppress government attempts to regulate in relation to those negative aspects of the company is motivated to try to infiltrate government and lobby government i mean when you look at  clinton administration bush senior bush junior and obama you look at various high ranking positions in the administrations of all of those presidents you find people who work for monsanto most people don't realize in has been around for about a century they've acquired a lot of resource and they are very clever and sophisticated they know how the game works they understand lobbying to understand bribery they ha the political structure that federal regulatory agencies in their favor to the point that it's almost physically impossible to pass any type of federal regulations or legislation because the people who make those choices have been in the revolving door months out of the year previously worked for them or their paid consultants with the governments now wherever they are are dependent on corporations who are these government who are these companies corporations telling people what to do what to eat what to feed their children we are people with the children of god we have constitution we have our charge for these new super food safety bills there's nothing in those bills that protect you it's there to protect the chinup against nearing industry and unfortunately if we don't stop this you won't see organic farmers t in the bills currently are so strict so so hard to trade that if you are small organic farmers you can't meet their requirements for safety as a result you want a business that a single human being on earth gets up and says boy i can't wait to go to the supermarket and buy a g m o food and why is that that is after thirty years and hundreds of billions of dollars of public and private investment they have a mill economy where the one thing in this food that actually helps the consumer no better taste no lower priced no point to trisha and nothing zip zero nada eighty five percent of all the genetically engineered crops in this country and around the world are designed so you can soak them with these chemical companies as the chemical seed back into spread and now with genitally engineered c c that originally was free in india because it belonged to the farmers always low cost was genetically modified while he realised he'd been contaminate because he used some of this herbicide to kill off weeds around utility poles on his property when he saw some of the seeds i did not die from the application of life a he knew it must be genetically modified or he didn't do anything to purge his property of back contaminated feed it would actually take three years of taking your crops out of use before you could completely purge them  they sued him for patent infringement and win all the way up to the canadian supreme court and all those they found that technically he did infringe their patent they awarded monsanto no damages both in canada and the united states hundreds  corporation like monsanto each year to buy their seed their ad because they're not allowed to use their own suit so as a victim you basically have to pay for your loss till your damages and so on so a promise become victims because they have done nothing wrong because they were contaminated by a neighbor by whatever means by paul and flow by seeds blown in the wind transportation and so on so it doesn't matter how it happens if you are contaminated it's over and it's over it's inevitable that someone who does not want to use their seed will become contaminated even the united states national or gannet program standards acknowledge this when they say you won't lose your getting certification contaminated up to a certain percentage is long as you take efforts to try to avoid that contamination monsanto has said that it's the responsibility of an organic farmer to use large portions of their own property to set up buffer zones to try to decrease the likelihood that they'll be contaminated by their neighbors that's quite perverse when it's their seed that's a new entrant into the neighborhood in the mid ninety's the u k government gave about three million bucks to a scientist to figure out how to test for the safety of that scientist was dr our pod cruise time the world's leading expert in his field he worked at the top nutritional research laboratory the u k one of the best of the world he had about twenty or thirty researchers working with him in three different institutes and his protocols that he was designing were supposed to be able to do into e u law as requirements for the safety assessments of any geos to be introduced  things growth for example how this young animals were growing what happened to their insides and what happened to their immune system and it became clear that the ate the g o p tail got sick they had potentially precancerous cell growth in their digestive tract smaller brains livers and testicles partial atrophy of the liver damage to mute system in ten days what was the cause of that th it was not the insecticide because the group in the insecticide did not have the problem it was understood that it was the process of genetic engineering itself and the unprotected side effects because this profound damage to every system of organ study team was disbanded they never implemented the protocols instead a campaign was launched to destroy his reputation in order to promote and protect the reputation of biotechnology we do have  santos scientists found bacteria growing in a chemical waste dump near their factory in the presence of around a herbicide roundup normally kills bacteria this bacteria was surviving they said great let's put it in the food supply so they took the gene from the bacterium that allowed it to survive the roundup and put it into soybean and now those roundup ready soybeans can be sprayed with roundup herbicide and they don't die just all the other plant biodiversity in the ground dy it does not allow the plants to access it also destroys the beneficial microorganisms in the soil which normally provide nutrients to the player it also promotes pathogenic organisms in the soil which then over rub the plan mash sugar beet pulp and soon alfalfa so a huge percentage of their food intake is roundup ready crop now remember roud up pulls the nutrients out of the crop it makes them unavailable so now we have millions of livestock eating nutrient deficient food and what do we eat we eat plants and we eat animals and take their milk so it turns out it's a perfect storm now not just for plant disease but for animal and human disease when forty four thousand secret f d m those were made public from a lawsuit about the subject of genetic engineering the director of the center for veterinary medicine made it absolutely contaminated with genetically modified corn genetically modified soybean genetically modified everything ninety five percent of all the genetic modifications are done in order to allow the plants to survive more chemicals being sprayed on them and to allow the animals to survive more drugs being put into them and of course what happens is that when their genes are changed our genes are changed by consuming them just as the super weeds and the super bugs are genetically altered by consuming them the bug eats the plant it's genes change the animal eats the the plant its genes change we eat the animal or the plant our genes change our babies genes change and that change is permanent they do not want you to know which products you are buying in the grocery store might contain genetically engineering gradients they say that but that label would confuse consumers they say there's no difference between genetically modified foods and well that's absurd that's what the word modified means in genetically modified it is modified it is different and it is in many ways a threat to the health of the people of our nation and people around the world genetic engineering is a process where scientists take genes from one species and force it into the d n a of other species even though there's been very little study of the health dangers there's been sufficient evidence of harm to cause the american academy of environmental medicine to say all doctors should be prescribed on g m o diets to everyone they say that the animal feeding studies link g m o's to reproductive problems mewed system problems accelerated ageing organ damage gastrointestinal distress dysfunctional regulation of cholesterol and insulin to name a few if you take the gene of it cow that helps it to produce milk that produces a whole moon called the bovine growth hormone and if you take that home and you start injecting into the cow the idea here is then the cow will produce more milk the companies like monsanto and lynley who invented the this  bovine growth hormone the senior scientists there testified before the senate that monsanto had offered a bribe of one to two billion dollars to approve r v g h without further study they say documents were stolen from a locked file cabinet in the government's office that they were big pressure to approve the drug which they thought was of questionable safety we have as rigged research hijacked regulatory agencies where many people at the agency at the f d a there was approving this bovine growth horrible where do any research on that possibly could be shown negative results of genetically engineered crops are harassed they are denied the universities that depend on  and kidneys when genetically modified soybean were fed to road we've seen changes in the testicles testicles changing from pig to blue changes in the sperm cells changes in the uterus and ovaries in the d n a functioning of the embryo offspring in two thousand and one a small california biotech company called epis site patented a product patented a gene which causes both men and women who eat it sterile if women eat the epicycle gene when they have intercourse their bodies produce antibodies to the sperm that has been deposited and they become infertile through the destruction of the sperm now dupont and monsanto formed a joint venture purchased the episodic firm and quote even your grandchildren sure you do we've seen smaller babies a death rate that's five times that compared to control sterile babies even babies with hair growing in their mouth and this has been done by government scientists as well as independent scientists who are the top of their field paying close attention to what you're about to see these rats are being fed with transgenic com during their entire life cycle the tumors they suffer from  enormous the study that revealed the effect of the g m o is on the health of these rats has just been completed it lasted for two years we spent over a year trying to obtain transatlantic on because no g m o manufacturers were willing to provide them seventeen millimeters ninety four percent of them take effect in the mammary glands which would have quite a breast cancer in a woman we are faced with renal tumors for the male some males also suffer from memory tumors one could have thought that the main cause of death was coming from the pesticide added to the corn but what the study highlighted and this for the first time ever is the fact that the trans genesis itself could have killed the rats what this means is that just by interfering with the gen order to modify it we are faced with repercussions that no one could have anticipated this is enough to make us reconsider all the scientific precepts that led to the creation of g m we realize that g m owes without any roundup residue  where they allow add a balls to graze on the cut plants after harvest in india for years and years there was no problem when they introduced this bt toxin producing thousands of sheep buffalo died go interviewed the people myself seen pictures of their dead animals these animals were successfully grazing on bt cotton plants for years in one case thirteen buffalo grazed on bt cotton plants for a single day and within three days they were all dead unfortunately there is not sufficient follow up one small non governmental organization pleaded with the government in india please do some research on these animals the government refused they pleaded with universities offering to pay for the research themselves they refuse so this small and geo did their own research they put three sheep in one field with bt cotton bowl guard one three with bull guard two and three with agency or university so we have a situation where the evidence is there but it's not being paid attention to because it's being drowned out by the big box and the baltic industry with their tobacco type science and their distortion of denial of the facts unfortunately months and bobby in power and their financial weight they are able to use corrupted corporate science something that i call cigarette science to get these these products slipped into our food stream the only human feeding study ever published on geo wounds showed that the gene that was inserted into the soybean transferred into the d n a of the bacteria living inside our intestines and could to new to produce that protein so if it happens to be an allergen and you are allergic to it you may be continuously triggered over and over again by the production of that allergen from with inside your own intestines when we look at the quality of the nutrients in our soil we see that that has become actually a victim of industrial agriculture which destroys the microorganisms in the soil and then a few nutrients as if that were enough to provide a healthy diet it turns out that the current industrial agricultural model was based plus military products after world war two they had extra bomb making material that worked as fertilizer so they created the synthetic fertilizer industry they had excess nerve gas that they could use as insecticides so they created insecticidal industry and by steering the farmers in the land grant universities and all the population towards these high input corporate driven agricultural models we actually stripped away some of the health plant when you use it to put a gene into a plant no longer have the same type of plant and you have change to make up monsanto is the only company i know of that doesn't want you to know you're buying something that has their technology inside cell phones computers automobiles everything else we purchase clothing is branded because everyone wants to know they want consumers to know that their product is inside whatever you're purchasing but monsanto wants that to be a secret if you go in purchase any of their bags of seed and you look at the back there's a big huge box with a big stop sign and when i first saw this i thought that meant stop this seed is dangerous don't swallow it wash your hands after you've touched it and all those health warnings are lower down the bag in smaller if you look in the box where the stop sign is actually says stop these seeds are protected by the following patents you these seeds must be in compliance with the license agreement you may not save the seeds for replanting baba baba but so they object to labeling of food that consumers buy but they have no problem with labeling their own product with all of their patent numbers so there are some things that they want the public to know and other things that they don't traditionally the proponents of genetic engineering have stated that there is relatively no risk century no difference between genetically engineer plants and products and conventionally raised products well new studies dispute this quite widely there was a study done last year in the journal reproductive toxicology that showed that over ninety three percent of genetically engineered toxins were found in the blood of pregnant women and eight percent of the fetuses so this whole problem toxin is being transferred into the population genetically modified soybeans has as much as seven times the amount of an old allergen compared to g m with the two are cooked with court there's a g that's normally shut off in court but it's switched accidentally a blood sample is cord and that gene produces a known allergy there's also more herbicides used these genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops like round up ready soil and the excessive herbicides might promote allergic type reaction peer reviewed studies show that there is an association between heavy g m o consumption and serious health problems including asthma and food allergies there's also a damage to the peg reus and the production of enzymes that are used for digestion in mice that are fed g m soy if we take longer to digest proteins and that lea eating genetically modified soy might cause us to be reactive to well wide variety of foods not just to g m so the real risk here the real concerns of these threats to the food supply are validated and there is the g e crop so the predominant crops and it contaminated the rest of the food supply then the genie is out of the bottle and it may be physically impossible to turn a situation around there's been no long term research on the concept or consequences of what this genetic modification does not just to us but to the environment and right now from all the research that showing up and says this has a very negative and profound effect on destroying the environment in which we live so therefore i find it senseless that the government would support and condone genetically modified foods without even having the basic research to understand the liabilities involved in creating these monster organisms and putting them into our world the conversation in europe and in countries in south america and in asia is much more sophisticated in terms of his understanding of science the importance of independent peer reviewed science that isn't contaminated or corrupted by corporate influence here in the united states you know the birthplace the bedrock of the free market system and democracy we're having our rights corrupted by corporate influence the major impact that monsanto has their ability to get their products approved with minimal scientific oversight and minimal review of these products for human health testing is really an abomination the entire scientific foundation underneath genetically modified organisms is false because organisms are not genetically determined and when we understand that recognise that the only way to create crops that will benefit humanity is to understand nature herself and learn to live in harmony with it and this is a completely different approach than humans have had for the last couple hundred years where we always thought oh humans job was to control and dominate nature in that process we are now leading the world into the six mass extinction of life on this planet five times in the history of this planet life essentially got wiped out and started all over again the five previous mass extinctions are attributed to things like comets or asteroids hitting the earth and destroying the environment we are now deep into the six mass extinction of life on this planet we're losing species of organism faster than even in the previous five mass extinctions but the source of the problem is much closer to home than a comet or an asteroid scientists recognize that it's human behavior that is undermining the web of life rather than trying to control nature our mission is actually how to learn to live in harmony with nature the f d a which treats the american people as flames knows that if people knew the truth about how healing their foods can be and how dangerous the processed foods really are with all their chemical contaminants and their genetic modification if people knew the truth they would demand food freedom they would demand access to healing herbal therapies and healing dietary supplements they would demand that the f d a back down from its intimidation campaigns that have been left leveled against producers of dietary supplements and herbal remedies and raw dairy products and so on people would demand that they knew and that is why they are kept ignorant under this campaign of dissent from ation currently being waged by the f garous in my opposition of the strategy for the large corporations use to use their influence for their benefit and as a result of that my position  frequently criticised by their own local networks a skeptic network and they're also their ability because they are so politically connected to use the federal regulatory agency to come after me personally to file claims against statements against my company and also to criticize me such that it can be viewed in most of the traditional media to skew the information the truth always saying they twist the table looks like we're that the bad guys when actually nothing could be further from the truth we're just seeking to do to help people understand what with the true reality here is give them the tools to make that distinction and make give them the right to know in the early two thousand montana the biotech industry vilified a scientist for his linking of bt corn to a decrease in monarch then the application of high doses of the of these we can destroy the weeds upon which other organisms normally would be consuming so the insect population is reduced and then there isn't the insect population upon which the bode's are also consuming so there could be a knock on effect on the body of a city within the fields where hopi saw tolerant crops are being grown and indeed large scale field trials sponsored by the u k government several years ago now did indeed find that in fields that were growing herbicide tolerant sugar beet and canola that the by diversity in the field was markedly reduced there is a lot of information now on b colony collapse and it's now length to certain of the chemicals that are sold by certain of the major companies so there's a lot of concern and now about that bees dying because now we lose a  chemicals more toxic chemicals than we ever ever had before and that's why we have a many of our beneficial and sex are being killed by the new types of chemicals  american people are beginning to become more aware and wake up to the fact that their government has been corrupted by corporations and the food that they're feeding themselves as possibly serious human algebras in the european union where labeling is required  there's almost no generically engineered food on store shelves in restaurants because almost none of it planted today more than fifty countries around the world allow labeling of genetically engineered food has received over a million comments from citizens demanding labeling of g m o as ninety percent of americans agree so why no labeling i give you one reason the influence and the corruption of the political process by monsanto if you have an organic corn crop that sits next to a genetically engineered corn field and it happens to tasseled the same time that it happens to be downwind you're going to get your crop contaminated in fact even the seed stocks are your become a chemo farmer whether you like it or not an expert of air pollution calculated how far corn pollen could travel in twenty four hours which is the maximum time they could remain viable to cross pollinate it could travel under certain weather conditions over five hundred miles they want the public to sit down and not think about what happened before this piece of meat got on my plate what happened before this glass of milk sat on the table we have an ethical responsibility i believe not just to other humans and to the future generations we have an ethical responsibility to all living creatures we have increasing numbers of retarded and autistic and genetically damaged people among us we have increasing numbers of lethal allergies and potentially lethal allergies that coincide with the introduction of genetically modified food we have increasing amounts of want to noon problems we have increasing amounts of pretty much everything pharmaceutical industry has no interest and having you well because they don't make any money if you're well and the pharmaceutical industry is the biotech industry and it is the ag of chemical industry thousands of doctors are now prescribing diets to every patient in fact the american academy of environmental medicine urges all doctors to do so they evaluated the animal feeding studies and said that there's a causal relationship between g m feed and disorders and they urged the government to put we're giving vaccines in children we're giving all these other drugs bad food prices side homeowners everything getting into the systems in animals and people this is going to plug countries back when we're talking about people whose lives are either terminated through preventable diseases which were not prevent through the toxic to cation of their bodies by toxic food total population of the world is about seven billion now they're saying by two thousand and fifty the publication will grow to approximately nine billion and these companies and the government all over the world are saying the amount of food in the world will have to be increased to twice the amount bowed to can destry is promising to feed the world with crop of hi because corrupt people people in power or people have their share now since g m o is reduced there has been a dramatic increase in infertility in the united states but there's significant evidence both in laboratory animal feeding studies as well as livestock experience to point a finger at round or pretty crops as a potential cause the newest information it was just published a week ago shows that concerned about our bills and they need to focus on a bigger price tag and that's our health care costs and we're not just talking about the cost of medications here how about the cost of missed work and lost productivity when parents have to rush their child to the emergency room or to a doctor's office and for the children how about that and summer camp we're talking about the emotional and societal cost played out over and over again hundreds of thousands and millions the the true story about what corporations are doing and in our society about the various harm and dangers that they present you can't rely in mainstream media you have to go deeper and you have to go further that's going to be a very important piece in us moving forward the fact that we do have those sources of investigation that are not beholden to corporation for corporate media and that we do have a even stealing through the food we eat through the television and programming in the news media received that information alone conscious to what you might call the no see above information that negative information about the world is causing us to become sick the food we eat exacerbates that same problem we are living in a situation where we must take back our own power they can surround the congress they can surround the congressional offices back in their district they can surround the month santo's in the city groups and that's what they got to realize that that's the first stage because people showing up in mass and together with that with agendas and with good work and signs in music scares the hell out of these politicians and their corporate tonight let's use the power of government to support what we want which is to know have choices stand up that you should have the right to human right to grow the food and crops that you want americans have a right to know if their food is genetically engineered it's time for labeling it's time for people to know how their food is being produced it is completely pro capitalist to have sings label that's where you know what you're getting and the consumer and the consumer over and over and over again they want to know they want to know they want the choice of producers a freak out because the choice is not going to be for them we have to start now and not let more contamination big hips and more danger to human health and the environment to the massive use of chemicals so by stopping a g m o's and eradicating g m o as you'd also then stop less chemical use and more danger to the environment and all of us are very concerned about human health and the environment what's going to get your children through this and your grandchildren generation what are we handing off to them what are we passing down to them if the earth is us and it's our greatest legacy what are they inheriting and if you care about what you put in your body you'll create as much of your own food supply as you can while you still can save seed grow heirloom foods without any chemicals and there's dozens if not hundreds of a method in ways that we can go about correcting this and  preventing this but we have to start making those changes now it's very important to be an organic farm for the future of our children and our grandchildren and our and even ourselves in the food that we don't give up your rights are human rights to this if what's important to you is what goes into your body and what your health is now and will be then you have to become activated but to do that we have to recognize there's a new science and that new science completely poles the foundation out under the conventional science of genetics and g m o those that science is false and destructive and the wake up call is knowledge knowledge is power lack of knowledge lack of power and what this world is suffering from now as a lack of knowledge because we do have knowledge we have knowledge that says how we can thrive live to a ripe old age of over one hundred very easily and enjoy the experience of being on this beautiful planet and most native american culture there their beliefs or their concepts were based on will this last for seven generations whereas we're asking what can get me through this year economically one year twelve months that's one of our greatest problems right now is to leap over that barrier that mentality will addition has happened it's here but the effects have to be diverse group in a good way when people learn about each other people learn about each other's religions to tolerate each other's spirituality it's time we cut down the buy and then now let's have that discussion again about chemical agriculture versus gaelic or traditionally our culture the overwhelming majority of the public want us to produce food and to raise animals in the natural healthy humane way in a way that doesn't destroy the environment public health and the climate and we're going to get to that point but it's going to require as i often put it the food fight of our lives