and that radical muslims were suspected of being the terrorists believe it or not my first reaction was that it sounded all too plausible the charlie hebdo magazine had carried was so this sort of things were going on for a while so when i heard radical islam shoot up some eggs of cartoonist yasser it could happen and then well how many people were killed ok eleven people killed another eleven injured in the charlie hebdo offices and then in a related incident into the streets of paris and other big french cities seemingly spontaneously and they seem to be staging what looked like a protest but wait this was a kind of a strange protest march but again i let me stress that my first impression before i even looked at any information about this event was to feel bad that this is a terrible act of violence presumably by angry muslims targeting cartoonists who had been satirising muslims i haven't looked that closely at charlie hebdo i didn't know how bad their stuff and then so i actually kind of sided with the slain cartoonist and thought this is an embarrassment as a muslim i am totally embarrassed that these you know some crazy violent hotheads would kill satirists because that's what i thought probably happened and this was another mostly actually who reacted in the same way this is a berkeley muslim cartoonist who contributed to our book honestly because he already had his career practically destroyed by the a d l the anti defamation league for publishing pro palestine cartoons he doesn't he doesn't want to be named in this book so he's not but his cartoons are in it and this was his cartoon a tribute to the slain charlie hebdo cartoonist who he considered as his brothers and sisters i guess or brothers they think they were all guys and then after that first impressions suddenly all sorts of strange things started making me question this event and of course i should be the first one to question it right i've been working for the truth about nine eleven and j f k and things like that for years  they got even me with the emotional punch of the first reports well here is the march in paris more than a million people in paris total actually two million i think i think the total was four million plus all over france possibly five million there something wrong with this picture i've been of s demonstrations they mostly have scrawls and you know fluorescent dayglo color really has a different weird looking sign once in a while there's some sort of anal retentive power freak who prints up a bunch of identical signs i think that's happened at one demonstration in my lifetime maybe but millions of identical signs that's very strange isn't that what's going on here so this is this was one of the many pieces of information that came in in the aftermath of the shooting that quickly made me start to question what was going on a lot of people saw some of the same things i saw them going to talk about so i'm not the only person that came to these kinds of conclusions or ask these kinds of questions the ron paul institute got pilloried by the n conservative propagandists for publishing an article by paul craig roberts asking whether charlie had those shootings were a false flag they tried to torpedo rand paul's candidacy by associating him with ron paul whose followers are a bunch of troopers and roberts by the way updated his article which was published just a few days after the shooting and it's in the book we are not charlie have though many other high level people around the world question the charlie hebdo attacks and suggested they look like a false flag as well this was the turkish president carried a gun who essentially said that it was an inside job a false flag the mirror of ankara turkey as well said the same thing in russia top level russian media and think tanks were saying the same thing even an american politician got some headlines here at the u k independent by charging that it was a false quite interesting way the independent published this frame of the alleged terrorists outside the charlie hebdo offices with this story and we'll come to the interesting videotape of these terrorists in a moment ben who is the founder of the national front the biggest nationalist party in france the party that is poised to take power in the next french press an intellect as his daughter marine le pen is very likely to be the next president of france he spoke up immediately after charlie hebdo saying that it was an inside job by the work of western intelligence agencies and then less than a week later his house was burned and not quite burned down but damaged badly in a fire and he was beat up he showed up with bruises on his face after his house had been burned in a fire and the official story that went out that he didn't question was that well he was injured escaping from the fire could be but i kind of don't think so so why are all these people saying it looks like a false flag or something wrong with his event ok we had millions of people with identical signs who printed those millions of signs up with millions of dollars what's that about so people were asking all these questions and then the other reason that they were asking these questions one of them was that we had a really strange set of mixed messages coming out of the french government first we heard the french government was one hundred percent behind these marches through the streets with identical signs of millions of people for what for free speech the rip french republic prides itself on its day right their slo a day the first one is leave out a freedom so they said we're out there demonstrating for freedom freedom of speech freedom of expression the freedom that these cartoonists were trying to exercise when they were brutally shot down by the evil muslim terrorists that was the official message from the french government and the demonstrations that it helped sponsor but in the immediate aftermath of this charlie hebdo shooting or series of shootings if we count the supposedly related ones the french government in acted the biggest crackdown on political free speech in the history of modern france they arrested him very quickly more than fifty people and within a month or two over one hundred people were arrested for arrested for tweeting a joke about the charlie hebdo attack a joke that did not sit well with the authorities and he wasn't the only one there were others including there was a teenager was arrested for doing a charlie hebdo parody so suddenly the french were rounding up people who were not toeing the line and not holding the just we surely i am charlie sign why was that you have to ask the question who gains from this one of the reasons that all of those people those famous people as well as ordinary people and internet sleuths like us were questioning this was if you simply ask who is going to gain from this event the answer was obviously not radical muslims quite on the contrary what this event did was that united he used numbers of people in the west with this magazine that during the past several years had been going way over the top printing obscene and just blasphemous but blatantly obscene attacks on islam taking basically doing pornographic attacks on islamic sacred symbol they threw in a little bit of anti christian pornography as well a tiny little bit just to spice it up that was mostly over the top of scene ultra offensive attacks on islam so no muslim in the world could possibly really you know who really knew what was going on hold a sign that says i am charlie that winning is this what they do they split the muslims of the world off from the non muslims especially from the west and made the west hate the most limbs with the impression that the muslims are crazed radical fanatics will run around killing you for making fun of their religion so who gains from that asking who gains from terrorism you know when you start looking at history leads us to some fairly interesting places europe has had a fair bit of terrorism over the past half century and the biggest and most spectacular wave of terrorism that hit europe since world war two was attributed to left wing fanatics people like the bioterror meinhof gang of germany or the red brigades of italy but in fact we now know and this is widely acknowledged even by mainstream historians that the biggest and most spectacular parts of that wave of terror essentially the whole thing was stage managed and perpetrated by nato what is nato it's of course the u s military occupying europe and what it really is so the us military high command actually ordered the bombing of the bologna a train station in was it nine hundred seventy nine one hundred eighty two i think it was as well as similar attacks that killed very large numbers of innocent european civilians and belgium shooters shot up shopping malls and killed people on the streets these were all people that were basically mercenaries that were taking their orders from kind of a parallel command wing of nato and the u s military ultimately they were operating under the authority of the american joint chiefs of staff are tightest military command why were they doing this well the american authorities were worried that europeans were going to vote into power socialists and other left wingers who would accommodate communists and they would leave europe out from under american occupation maybe we're still occupying europe germany is totally occupied nato is everywhere in europe and it's used to keep europe under control and keep it following the p imperial policy it's not really american policy that our masters of empire are not exactly flag waving americans but in any case so the purpose of this false flag terror implicating left is was to keep europe in slave to hard right wing leaders who would toe the line of the empire and this is been proven seven ways from sunday the european union the european parliament is actually investigated this and stamp that yes it happens so it's widely admitted to be true even among the mainstream institutions but people are not supposed to know about it here was a quote from vince sense of insecure talking about operation gladio how it worked you had to attack the civilians people women children far removed from any political gain this would allow authorities to bring in a state of emergency the state of emergency which gives the government special powers so it can keep people in line take their money and protect them against enemies foreign and domestic this is beloved of  many political operators especially today's neo conservatives they love the state of emergency they want political life to be nothing but one stop state of emergency uniting us against an evil external enemy ok back to paris so people are questioning this people who knows them history are questioning this like paul craig roberts the president of turkey and so on they're all questioning this again what another reason is that we're getting just blatant deception in the aftermath of this charlie have the operation we have millions of identical signs that somebody  up that cost a lot of money and they're all carrying it and orchestrated social media tweeting just reach only campaign that cost huge amounts of money to push out to the world and then we have this photo op where world leaders gathered in paris to lead the millions of people marching to support free speech to support the charlie had cartoonist's the only problem was these reports which you may have seen in the media showing the world leaders leading the march were photoshop these pictures the above picture which appears to show the world leaders leading a march of ordinary millions of ordinary people was produced by taking the world leaders with their small entourage off onto a very carefully cordoned off side area with lots of security around to make sure they didn't get anywhere near any ordinary people film the leaders marching here they are being filmed in the lower part and then photoshop to give us the upper image of the leaders leaving millions of people i mean a more dramatic example of the orwellian propaganda that dominates  mainstream media could hardly be imagined interestingly enough not everybody went to paris john kerry and president obama were apparently invited but they said no that's interesting maybe there was some kind of split in the ruling circles for whatever reason and kerry and obama as you all know have had some say bad blood with netanyahu over in israel the neo cons and the core close friends with they work with the netanyahu network that whole network hardline zionist network who are widely suspected of being behind some of these outrageous have had problems with obama to the point that andrew had learned the editor of the atlanta jewish times newspaper leading newspaper with various biggest jewish ruling circles to some extent and kerry and obama apparently were not that happy about the charlie hebdo thing they didn't fly over they stayed away from the march so who showed up well we saw netanyahu in the front ranks of the world leaders and boy he looked like some people s mafia don showing up at the funeral of his victims kind of to really you know pound his chest so he would he was he showed his way to the front line of this march which he was not invited he was the he unalike obama and kerry he was specifically  disinvited by french president francois all along said stay away bibi we don't want you you just slaughtered thousands of people in gaza this summer we don't want you here but bibi was not one to be turned away so he came to france with his waving is million french jews were in grave danger if they remained in france and they should immediately flee to israel that would solve israel's demographic problem or at least go a long way toward solving it the question of who gave then i would point in  part to those israeli leaders who are very concerned about their demographic crisis in which jews have already become a minority of the people living in historic palestine and interestingly enough if we go back before this quote if france criticizes israel this is where in relation to the gaza massacres if france criticizes israel instead of the terrorists this plague of terrorism will come to your country so he threatened france that if france continued to side with the palestinians in gaza this wave of terrorism will come to france that was less than half a year before the charlie hebdo wave of terrorism came to france and he warned that palestinian statehood recognition by france would be quote unquote a grave mistake well then what happened to the french in december one month before the charlie hebdo event voted to recognize a palestinian state exactly what netanyahu had threatened them not to do one month later boom charlie hebdo happens people are being killed in paris and bibi netanyahu is stopping to the front of the line and then going telling all the half a million french jews to flee france this looks pretty bad not just to people like me who sided with the palestinians in this particular dispute but to a lot of people who don't including barry chom a she contributed to this book we are naturally had to bury is a right wing strongly  jewish israeli investigative reporter but he's not an idiot and he's not a conscious liar and so he's in this book saying it looks like bibi netanyahu was behind the charlie hebdo terrorist event that's a heck of a thing for is one of israel's leading investigative journalists who's a strong right wing procyon is to say and it's one of the most amazing pieces of writing in this book but it probably wasn't just the israeli side in in the book actually point away from that and say no the israeli angle here might just be partly a distraction because the real action might be with his nato empire the larger empire of which israel is just a part in webster tarpley is one of these people as you'll see if you read his essay in the book webster tarpley is one of our greatest alternative historians and he notes that president old on the france had been cozying up to putin of russia and trying to negotiate an end of the same sions that were being slapped on russia by who else the neo cons are favorite warmongers there every day want war with iran they want to smash up the middle east for israel but they also would love to go to war with russia and maybe china i don't the end they never heard of a war possibility that they didn't like so poland wasn't really getting with that program a lot was resisting and he was about to torpedo this whole sanctions regime on russia and so according to tarpley is a reading of the charlie hebdo massacre this was designed to send a message to the french ruling circles and especially to alone he had also not been marching in lockstep with libya policy the libya situation is a tragedy let's not get into the details that basically are our empire has trashed destroyed and demolished libya murdering its present g and turning it into a complete failed state run by gangs militias organized crime elements and so on and so on had been fighting other elements of the empire on libya too as well as on  russia and he also supported the anti dexterous series of party in greece which was really getting out of line with nato so he was bucking nato on several fronts and suddenly boom this charlie hebdo thing happens france turns becomes much more disciplined france's rap tibet brought back into the war on terror and marching in lockstep with nato tarpley thinks that was actually the number one reason for charlie hebdo not not netanyahu in the israeli angle and then the law and was rewarded because just like bush on nine eleven who went from like fifteen percent twenty percent some very ridiculously low popularity rating to ninety percent went from like the lowest to the highest in terms of popularity rating overnight due to nine eleven like was president along benefited politically from the charlie hebdo attack so as he has to toe the line and stop behaving independently he also is rewarded by having his popularity shoot back up ok let's look at some of the actual forensic evidence or direct evidence that this was a false flag the stuff that so many of these people were pointing to the from the turkish politicians to the russian intelligentsia to paul craig roberts the former assistant secretary of the treasury one of the hundred most influential people in the world according to who's who he's in the book saying it's a false light why well here's a piece of evidence going to show you some footage of the charlie had two shootings which has been restricted or taken down from a number of websites as you'll see it contains no blood gore or graphic violence it does however point to major hole in the official story now if we zoom in and slow it down you'll see that the officer isn't actually hit by a bullet there is a blast that hits the sidewalk just in front of him but he is clearly not hit in the head as corporate media is claiming watch it again notice that the head isn't rocked by the blast as it would be if he was actually hit noticed the plume of dust about a foot in front of him as a shot it's ground this is an a k forty seven a hit to the head would splatter blood and brains all over the sidewalk anyone who claims that this footage shows someone being hit in the head by a seven point six two by thirty nine millimeter round either has no experience with guns or is lying this is a big bullet that has massive damage and makes a bloody mess this officer was not killed by gunshot to the head my first thought here was ok they missed just one problem every single mainstream media outlet is claiming that he was finished off with a shot to the head and that's blatantly false so then you have to ask what else are they lying about so we have a little problem here this apparent shooting up it looks like what happens here is that the guy dressed up as the terrorist in the black ski mask goes by kind of aims at the head and then swivels the bear a little further so it's not aiming at the head when  actually fires the shot and the shot then kicks up a little dust bunny on the sidewalk and a k forty seven bullet a live round would spray enter and crater the concrete of the sidewalk it wouldn't pick up a little dust bunny so what this indicates is that he was shooting blanks playgrounds or cotton or paper wads and the cotton or paper wad exits from the muzzle not at the head of the sensible victim but rather maybe a metre or so in front of him and kicks up a little dust so they're shooting blanks and they're kind enough to not shoot the blank actually at the head of the extensible victim which would be very painful though not life threatening it's very odd if there's a fake shooting in front of the charlie hebdo offices and kind of makes you wonder what happened in those offices additionally it's very odd that the media censored this video the part that you just saw was never shown on the mainstream media why not well as you heard they censored it because what they said was it was too bloody they said this is too gory and bloody and we can't show you this part of the problem actually the real problem is the opposite it wasn't gory and bloody enough it didn't show an actual shooting this left a lot of people scratching their heads and ballistics experts i've talked to all agree with the interpretation expressed in that video you saw ok how about the a sensible perpetrators let's let's go over that what supposedly happened these two guys according to the most recent official story the coati brothers entered the charlie h offices were able to talk their way past what little security there was because since interestingly the level of security of the charlie hebdo office was massively downgraded week before so they got through there went in shot a lead killed eleven people wounded eleven  fled as you saw them supposedly fleeing so who are these guys who did this now the witnesses who saw this that these guys look really slick like special operations people who are just click click click going through you know they look like amateurs who are they well the brothers were a pair of hapless lowlives very very well known to all the big intelligence agencies not just french intelligence but u s probably israeli and certainly british intelligence because they believe the british mainstream media has reported that these guys were totally covered by british intelligence they one of them actually both of them were busted for child pornography years before and that was made to go away now if something like that happens these are muslims they're low life muslims living in the banya ghetto france hang around with all the you know low life characters and  hardcore political people and all that you know that that mill you that's their world and so if they're busted for child pornography and then that's made to disappear and they go their merry way that kind of suggests to me at least knowing what i know about how muslim communities have been treated by the the establishment the powers that be there are there are there are agents there are you know they've been made into assets their intelligence assets and their record shows that they were certainly intelligence assets they did things that normal people couldn't do they travel to israel and went from israel into jordan syria and i forget if they went further to yemen supposedly i think they supposedly went to yemen this is impossible you can't get into jordan and syria if you've gone to israel if it's a stamp on your passport they won't let you in like if i went to israel i would never get into a middle eastern country again unless of course you're working for the israelis if you're working for the israelis they will you know oh would you mind being a say in them or a unpaid asset of our intelligence services or better yet would you mind being a paid asset of our intelligence services sure would just be kind enough to not stamp your passport and you'll be getting some help doing what we'd like you did on the line so that must have happened with these guys and another odd thing about these guys besides the fact that they were just kind of lowlifes not exactly people you would think would be special ops level killers say the least is that rather than being in captured interrogated and that's what you want if these were like real serious islamic state or al qaeda terrorists who are working with a very capable foreign you know international terror network perpetrating huge outrages killing lots of people who knows what they're go next well are you going to just hunted down and kill them or are going to capture them and interrogate them i kind of just like with bin ladin this whole story that they supposedly just hunted down bin laden just to kill him if he was a real terrorist mastermind that would make no sense at all they would do they would sacrifice anything to get him alive and interrogate him if that were the case