him that i was not going to work the reason was that it was such a beautiful day that i went to stay home i wanted to take a sick day off and i called my supervisor and he begged to me to go back into the company and i made it work but i made it late and there was a miracle by itself because if we if i made it there at eight o'clock i would have been dead automatically or i would have been trapped on the top of the building screaming in our room in pure of harvard because we didn't know what it was and the first thing that comes to my mind is that a generator just blew out all the basement on the mechanical rule i was on  one basement one when this huge explosion happened that pushes up or seen here an indication that something very powerful exploded below us and at that moment when i went to say it would have bought the impact and the explosion of the two separate explosions were recorded at a distance of about nine seconds from each other during a business meeting that was taking place in a building nearby one liberty plaza and when i said don't move because i was going to pick up the phone to call the emergency medical unit that was located on the other tower another explosion and that's when i said not everybody got to get out f have water going into the lift and they had were in capsulated and they were screaming that they were going to drown i was able with the help of another guy to open the door finally latter get these two people now save them take him outside the building and go back inside small explosions going off in new york is that any sky creeper three doors will not open on the story cases one will open but he won't open one will open so we have to go and open all those doors that did not open they told their equipment they called the jack they took their boots they drop themselves on the floor very shocking moment for me because they said oh my god i feel like i something on the news that i was ok when i went to pick up the phone she was like what are you doing there everybody in the world knew about us what was happening she said get out now and i say i can i'm helping these people they don't know the building but don't worry and i lie to her i said i'm going to get up to certain parts but i'm not going to get to the area where they have the fire when my actual intention was to go to windows of the world on the left side i see the marriott hotel almost gone bodies everywhere and i said god please help me and the only thing i see is a fire truck in front of the building and i just slid right over the fire truck and all this on th destruction that will that you know i don't expect anything else to be but that body was that a bomb i have no idea what he was but the people that i really wanted to help i know i never was able to save a single one of them i lost two hundred friends on nine eleven a lot of people call me a conspiracy theorist and it's funny because i was there i am an eye witness i have tried to tell their part of the story which actually coin side with mine i lost two hundred friends that do not have answers and i will continue until we get the answers studied physics at mit i did electrical engineering for about eight years had quite a bit of practical engineering experience when i first saw the collapses i was absolutely convinced that they were not spontaneous one of the first things that i did was to speak with one of my patients who is a retired army corps of engineers fellow who's done a lot of demolition and construction showed him some of the public sourced videos that are available of it and he immediately pointed out that there were squibs switch represent little smoke essentially coming out of the buildings initially which were clearly a sign of controlled demolition he had no opinions beyond that but he said without without doubt that it was a controlled demolition that sort of set me on the path of continuing to examine it and trying to gather as much evidence as i could and the question i pose what don't we know and why don't we know it is sort of addressing the fact that at this point we still do not really have a meaningful explanation for what happened to the buildings we have had several studies at this point which i will go into as to trying to determine a plausible scenario for the collapse as of this point none of them have  anything that i think could be reasonably called convincing and detailed account of why the collapses occurred and the question that's been addressed previously the enormous destruction of physical evidence  as chris was saying the site was it was scrubbed very thoroughly out of the entire mass of the buildings that were destroyed the national institutes of standards and technology who are now doing the ongoing investigation managed to save about two hundred two hundred forty pieces out of the entire building all of the rest of it was was basically recycled you know the obvious question is what does it mean that there was a controlled demolition at the simplest level it means that someone had a lot of access to the buildings over a long enough period of time to set this up it implies as many other things have tonight that the people who had effective control of the site had an interest in having it scrubbed and making sure that no information was available that if a forensic reconstruction couldn't be done even in much smaller catastrophes we typically will reconstruct things as as as completely as possible for example t w a flight eight hundred was constructed was required pieces were dragged off to the bottom of the sea a complete reconstruction was done to allow detailed analysis in this case the exact opposite was done the first report that was really issued on this was issued by fema in collaboration with the american society of civil engineers that was basically a volunteer team from a c e that had very limited access to the site a lot of the pieces that they were able to retrieve were retrieved by going to landfills and trying to find interesting pieces before they were disposed of the initial fema report basically acknowledge that the kerosene would have burned off very quickly what wasn't destroyed in the initial fireball would have been consumed fairly rapidly and would have only really served as a condition for the rest of the material and the second point being that the the fuel here really was strictly office contents if you think of the modern office with copying machines computers and as has been previously mentioned of the smoke particularly from building to just before it collapsed was was very black looking  this is generally an indication of an inefficient fire in which there is not enough oxygen for the amount of fuel these types of fires typically burn very cool day they are not hot flames like blowtor the cores themselves basically a if you've seen diagrams of the building there is a large central rectangle in each of the towers that contained forty seven columns and these columns basically were  the primary structural support of the building they were given the role of supporting the the whole gravitational load of the building since they were so strong it would have been reasonable to think that they would have withstood at least to some extent the collapse but in fact as we see after the buildings collapsed there was basically only little stubs of these things standing up the floor to above the ground level the cores did not have much in them that would burn the cores basically were dedicated to things like elevator  utility shafts stairways so you have dry wall material you have a little bit of carpeting you don't really have any inflammable material in the core itself the core was specifically designed so it could not function as a chimney they did not want in the case of a fire for the fire to be able to travel through the elevators or for air to come in through the elevators so they were designed with with this architect aaron swirsky of lee who was referred to as a hermetically seal system there were fire shutters that were designed to close off the core in the event of an event like this and those as far as we know functioned properly which means that there was a very limited amount of oxygen available case where is the issue of what failed and how some of the initial suggestions and these showed up in the know the documentary which was a good example of what i like to call proof by a computer animation thomas gar who was a materials scientist but not a structural engineer who became a spokesman for these documentaries indicated that the floors had somehow failed that the trusses supporting the floors had failed this was the theory that was put forward actually in the initial fema report subsequently there have been basically complete contradictions of that jim hofmann has done quite a bit of research which is available on the web concerning the the problems with this idea that the floors would have simply fallen there was a study done by the wide linger associates the chief engineer there was mathis levy who is a very well known authority on building collapses he specifically disavowed the idea of  or collapsing of the floors and the most recent official report we have on this which is from the national institutes of standards and technology and i asked he rejected the idea that floor collapse was part of it and so as as a result we have basically no sequential model at this point what and i asked he has suggested is that there was some kind of simultaneous collapse of the cores but they have not attempted to give any kind  of modeling as to whether those cores could have in fact been destroyed by the fires in the way that they claim the building was designed to have a fully loaded seven seven crash into it that was the largest plane at the time i believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners speak us this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door this intense grid and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting it really does nothing to the screen addi i walked into the office and the first words that i heard was a plane's just running into the world trade center and my initial thought was well that's ok it's built to withstand a seven o seven it did not seem possible that they were designed to withstand the impact of a seven o seven could possibly collapse in such a short order of time from the time that they were hit they were designed i remember walking up to a window and a young man turned to me with tears coming down his face and he said well they fall down and i said no never has a steel structure building in the history of steel structure buildings ever fallen down for the reasons of fire the majority of the jet fuel was burnt up instantly in the big fireball an the fires that were left office for she's carpet things like that a lot of things in these kind of buildings have to be fire resistant by nature it's required by code so there really isn't a whole lot of fuel in there to begin with our own powers of observation you could tell by by scene these fires and see black smoke come out the windows that means that the fires were oxygen starved and it was incomplete  and so it was a road temperature fire i looked up in the manual the burning temperature of jet fuel and found that under the conditions that existed at the world trade center on nine eleven that jet fuel had been burning at about seven hundred fifty degrees fahrenheit i also notice that the official explanation of what happened there was that the heat from the fire supposedly softened the steel and thereby brought the buildings down if you have a flame at seven hundred fifty degrees you can hold that flame under a steel beam for ever and you'll never reach a high enough temperature to bend steel let alone melted it so immediately i knew at that point that the official explanation was dead wrong first of all let's go back to your basic tin still that was being dug out underground it was still so hot that molten metal dripped on the sides of a wall this is fused element of of steel not molten steel and concrete and all of these things all fused by the heat into one many witnesses firemen and lots of people described the slowing molten metal iron or steel at extreme the hot temperatures and john goes categorically denied there were reports of molten steel having been seen in the in the rubble pile of all three buildings and i knew that jet fuel which is essentially kerosene is not capable of melting steel nor iron kerosene or jet fuel burns at less than sixteen hundred degrees fahrenheit and molten steel needs at least twenty seven hundred degrees fahrenheit in order to melt in an office fire you cannot generate enough heat steel and yet we have evidence of molten iron in the microspheres in the rubble pile and the metal pouring out of the side of the tower that i saw pouring out of the south tower is indicative of molten i overflights had detected to do with infrared cameras fourteen hundred degree fahrenheit hot spots on the surface of ground zero and that being there for a week supported at one point i think they were about twenty eight hundred degrees one of the most significant things to to my thinking that indicates that this could not have been the sort of lapse that we are told it was is the presence of the dust clouds and as you've seen in the pictures and i'm sure all of this is who've seen probably more than we would like there were very very large clouds of very thick dust that envelop the area that crossed the river that made it almost all the way to new jersey from the pictures that i've seen this type of flow is something that we are familiar with in physics it occurs in only two situations that we know of  naturally one is in the can occur options where a large amount of material is suddenly exploded into the air and basically forms small particles the other situation is something called her ability currents these occur along the edges of the continental shelves where mud or sediment will slump become suspended in water and the common thread is that you have large amounts of a dense material that is suspended very quickly in a fluid thereby creating another denser fluid which is in effect the dust cloud and that fluid can achieve considerable velocities the problem with creating this sort of slurry of fine particles is that there really is no mechanism that has been proposed we have concrete floors with carpeting or flooring over them we have furniture we have floors basically that are coming together in a collapse but the concrete is basically protected under these layers early in the collapse in the very first moments we see these thick clouds being ejected at very high speed they're clearly dense because they flow downward and become part of this large overall pirate plastic flow we're basically being told is that the concrete sort of jumped up into mid air exploded itself and then was ejected as the floors came together not a very plausible mechanism but i have yet to hear of anything else as to explain it from quite a few people on the scene we've been told that the powder that represented most of the concrete that the amount of intact macroscopic chunks of concrete on the scene were were negligible that basically everything was reduced to powder and incidentally we also know that other things besides concrete were reduced to powder you know the contents of computers exotic metals from computer chips these sorts of things were were also identified in the dust and in very small particles is generally on the order of less than one hundred microns in diameter so we have a real issue of mechanism as far as what in the in the process of this collapse could cause so many things to be pulverized so finally you have two hundred ten story office buildings you don't find a desk you don't find a chair you don't find a telephone  computer the biggest piece of a telephone i found was half of the keypad and it was about this big the building collapsed to dust the spread of debris and the water draining us around each tower what we see is an outward explosion of material beyond the primer is a huge footprint and this is not expected and it's not can grow it with the reports of our government buildings the exception of the materials out of the building the manner in which it fell the speed at which it fell exhibit all the signs of demolitions and the completeness of destruction down to their individual elements when the south tower was destroyed it first it looked like it was going to land in the street or take a building up next to it and then all of the sudden it disappears in this huge cloud of smoke when you look at where the towers used to stand there is surprisingly so little rubble where did all the rubble it's a very good question peter and i have asked some people who've been doing some of the rescue and recovery work this morning if you look behind  you can see the very remains the skeletal remains of the world trade center and one volunteer robert carlin skee explain to me the reason there's so little rubble is that all of it simply fell down into the ground and was as an architect i would expect to see larger portions of the building floors the decking the steel decking the concrete topping much larger remnants what the structural components of this building was after all there was one hundred ten floors in each building and each floor plane was over an acre in si right just a couple of other anomalies as we know there are reports of explosions there were reports of underground explosions in both of the towers at the time of the impact from a building engineer by the name of philip murali their interviews with him on the web from the brother are still nine eleven we see that the lobby of the north tower was extensively damaged with with looks like high explosive blast damage and this was immediately after the plane collision and i think a on in the first building and escaped through the lobby where they report they believe there was a bomb in the lobby we ran down the steps to the lobby there was no lobby everything was gone up and even the turnstile was burnt it was sticking out and they just told us to run as we were coming out we passed the lobby he was in the lobby so i believe the bomb hit the lobby fairs and a couple seconds in the first plane hit the first the first explosion and there was a second explosion in the same building there were two explosions ok federal agencies that were down they do believe that there was some sort of explosive device somewhere else besides the planes hitting there was a nother explosion that took place in one of the towers here so obviously he forty to his theory he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building that the f b i most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with explosives underneath the buildings which also exploded at the same time and brought both of them down you know that's the first time we're hearing that so two planes and explosives that were in the building is that correct that is the working theory at this point they were having coffee in the world trade center when the first plane struck and all the sudden found alive i don't know where  boom there are so many videos of witnesses from that day that report explosions there's radio transmissions from the afghan why we have the transcripts that were recorded you know back in two thousand and one of all these firefighters and first responders reporting explosions at this testimony s cause the presumption that there was a good chance explosive residue would be found and justified testing for it rather than the opposite it doesn't look like a collapse it's like a huge mushroom in billowing kind of an event that whole thing looks nothing like the building falling down it's a building being blown up that's what it was it shows yet they refuse to consider the possibility that explosives or some other form of even though a controlled demolition seems the only valid explanation for the collapses the debunkers have brought different arguments against this possibility the first argument is that it would have been impossible to place the explosives under everyone's eyes it would take an army of workers it would take months so this idea that you know some crew dressed in black and sneak in the night and wire a building like that to be demolished is just it's absurd eleven a major renovation of the elevator system in both towers was undertaken from the march two thousand and one issue of elevator world we read elevator hundred took what was perhaps one of the largest most sophisticated elevator modernization programs in industries history at new york city's prestigious world trade center no one is suggesting that this company had anything to do with the possible planting of explosives but such an extensive renovation process would have certainly provided the cover for a special team to access the internal structure of the buildings had any given time as explained by richard human chief electrical engineer for the twin towers the elevator shaft a direct access to the core columns a very familiar with the interior structure secondly the movement of heavy equipment on floors that were supposedly empty was noticed in the weeks leading up to nine eleven scott forbes worked for a financial institution on the ninety seventh floor of the south tower that might have been at least four to six weeks was supposed to be there as a matter of fact not even the elevators stop there you have to have a special access key to open the door on the thirty fourth floor thirdly after the nine hundred ninety three attack bomb sniffing dogs have been adopted in the security system of the twin towers but on thursday september the sixth bomb sniffing dogs were abruptly removed according to a security guard with no apparent reason and lastly there was an unprecedented power down in the south tower on the very weekend before nine eleven for the first time in thirty years all the security systems in the building had become useless at the same time people could come and go as they pleased even in protected areas without being seen nor recorded by surveillance cameras the previous weekend been a power down because of the power down there was a complete breakdown of security that we can we had guided tours coming into the security areas by mistake and nobody thinking it up because there was no intrusion alarms or or anything else scott forbes was also present during the power down there was a power down in the south tower on the weekend of the eighth and ninth of september noticed but with the proper cover story it could have been done under everyone's eyes in full daylight without anybody even questioning what was going on and as far as the initial impacts this recent study made an interesting point about the world trade center to the film analysis showed that it also waited for about four minutes after it was struck by the airplane and the oscillation rate was identical to what would be expected for the intact tower trade center towers and most modern buildings are heavily redundant in the sense that the load bearing can be shifted to other members if some of them fail and we saw that happen in this case stresses do redistribute but absent further weakening of the structural members that distribution is is limited it happens the structure e stabilizes and unless there is significant hurt or damage it doesn't progress to a total collapse for the cow the towers to collapse the way we saw them collapse basically implies that the columns simply collapsed into themselves they telescope straight down  keeps a lot of its structural integrity even even when he did until you begin to approach the melting point you don't really see a catastrophic loss of strength and this is what we're talking about we're talking about basically vertical box columns collapsing into themselves which implies a complete loss and the capital strength the top section pushing on the bottom section it's going to meet equal forces as it goes both sections are going to be demolished at the same rate so by the time you've crushed up fifteen stories below the top fifteen stories are also going to be crushed and so there's nothing left now to crush the rest of the building something of this kind is what we should have seen when the top section of the towers collapsed on to the lower one the upper and lower sections should have mutually destroyed each other until all the energy is dissipated and the system comes to a rest alternatively as shown in this experiment with two towers made of snow the top section could have fallen off to the side after the initial collapse what could not have happened is this little tiny chunk of the building can't possibly fall and crush the entire structure below it this is such a simple fundamental concept that architects and engineers were astonished in seeing it totally ignored by nist this is high school physics and our whole society is being led to believe that these fundamental laws of physics hard science don't apply anymore but even if we assume that the top section of the tower had enough potential energy to destroy the rest of the structure below it could not have done so at the speed it did which was near free fall speed assuming that the top section on the left contains enough potential energy to destroy the rest of the tower and assuming we dropped both upper sections of the same time which one would hit the ground first it would be the second of course as it finds no obstacles in its path the section on the right foot quickly accelerate to freefall speed and maintain it all the way to the ground the section on the left instead needs to use some of its energy to destroy the structure below so it could never achieve freefall speed in the case of the twin towers however both upper sections fell with an acceleration close to freefall speed as if the path had been practically free from obstacles it took each tower between ten and twelve seconds to collapse to the ground while in absolute freefall time would have been nine point two seconds in other words both upper sections of the towers found enough energy to destroy eighty thousand tons of healthy structure below while the accelerator to near free fall speed this is as we have said absolutely impossible by gravity alone the law of momentum conservation won't allow the building cannot do freefall with huge structural steel structural system in place to support it the one towers couldn't could not have come straight down through the resistance of eighty thousand tons of structural ste big of a practically free fall the just would not happen if in fact it actually hit and made an impact was effectively crushing anything pushing hard on this core structure below  the core structure is going to push back equally hard and that's what's going to cause the top section of the building slowdown as energy is drained away from the system to deformed those members it would slow down the descending mass and cores descend at less than freefall speed there is only one way for those buildings to have collapsed at the speed they did the buildings fall at a speed which can only occur if the structure has been removed structure below since the falling section didn't have any extra energy to do so the fact that it's coming down at freefall so all of the energy is being used to just make it go straight down which means it's coming down through itself and not breaking up the building as it goes something else has to be clearing the way the near freefall speed of about ten seconds has been confirmed by different official sources the nine eleven commission wrote that the south tower collapsed in ten seconds mr sunder from nist has confirmed similar timings measurements have indicated that tower one collapsed in about eleven seconds and tower to collapse in about nine seconds mr sunder has also acknowledged t the towers came down practically at freefall speed as a result the entire top of the building came down pretty much in freefall the same admission is present in the official report since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance the building section above came down essentially in free fall at this point we can pose the following question given that the building section above came down essentially in free fall given that for freefall to occur no supporting structure must be present and given that the falling sections didn't have any extra energy to destroy the structure below can you suggest anything different from some kind of controlled demolition for the removal of the supporting structure which was necessary for near freefall speed to be achieved these terrorists kill not merely to end lives but to disrupt and end a way of life with every atrocity they hope that america grows fear for retreating from the world and forsaking our friends they stand against us because we stand in their way we're not deceived by their pretenses to piety we have seen their kind they're the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the twentieth century by sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions by abandoning every value except the will to power they follow in the path of fascism did you know a third tower fell on nine eleven at approximately five twenty p m on september eleventh two thousand and one world trade center building seven collapsed and six point five seconds due to normal office fires according to the government  seven collapsed at freefall for over one hundred feet this admission brings with it some serious implications that have yet to be addressed if this sounds a bit odd to you you're not alone polls show that thirty percent of u s citizens still have questions about the official nine eleven hypothesis rethink nine eleven is a rapidly growing coalition of more than fifty organizations from around the world including well respected organizations of scientists technical experts peace activists religious persons veterans and surviving family members of nine eleven victims all of these groups are coming together in an unprecedented global outreach campaign in a collective commitment to raise worldwide awareness and support for a transparent and independent investigation into the destruction of all three world trade center skyscrapers on nine eleven a comprehensive investigation is needed to address  scientific facts and evidence which simply cannot be ignored here's rethink nine eleventh's ad that will be seen around the world throughout the month of september you'll see rethink nine eleven on subways billboards and sides of buses on bumper stickers t shirts lawn signs and freeway overpasses on library bulletin boards on store fronts and all over facebook twitter and you tube rethink nine eleven is ready to facilitate renewed and growing interest in this highly relevant issue by drawing attention to that lesser known third tower a forty seven story skyscraper which was not hit by an airplane but collapsed completely from top to bottom on nine eleven world trade center building seven has been a starting point for many and will be the initial focal point of rethink nine eleventh's campaign to be followed by a dish and all significant facts and points of evidence regarding the total destruction of all three world trade center skyscrapers on nine eleven the campaign will empower people worldwide in together we can at last bring widespread public attention to this vital issue it's simple go to rethink nine eleven dot org right now and donate your city campaign with everyone you know and together let's change the course of history remembering nine eleven is not enough rethink nine eleven or the evidence might surprise you