it stay is more than one small country it is a big idea a new world order where diverse nations are drawn together in common  to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind with few exceptions the world now stands as one the world can therefore seize this opportunity to fulfill the l light and that's why i want to be here today about the new world taking shape around about the prospects for a new world order now within  so what's really going on here why on earth would israel do something like this the first thing to be aware of is that these recent moves against syria are actually indirect attacks on iran syria and iran are bound by mutual defense treaty and any large scale war that breaks up with either one can most likely draw  sixty five which affirmed that the united states could fully back israel militarily in financially should attack iran this is very serious considering that israel has openly indicated its desire to use military force against iran on numerous occasions and this aggression by israel comes right on the heels of accusations by the u turns out a u n investigation into the matter revealed that it was actually the nato backed rebels which used the syrian gas accomplice not the syrian government this is more than just an embarrassing mix up there's evidence that this event was set up to frame the syrian government and to create the pretext for u s military involvement what's shocking here is that in their attempt to frame the syrian government nato has actually facilitated the use of chemical weapons on a civilian population this is a war crime by any measure now of course after syria went public about the airstrikes israel was forced to put forth an official justification and they're no claiming that these attacks targeted a shipment of this was headed for hezbollah and lebanon however some analysts believe that the real motive was to rail syria's recent progress in their fight against foreign militants who've been entering the country from lebanon hezbollah which is the most powerful military force in lebanon has sided with president assa government in what they say is a war against foreign backed terrorists and on may first they indicated they may directly intervene in the conflict russia's also taking the side of the syrian government repeatedly calling for an end to extreme interference and morning the u s plans to increase material support to the rebels could have grave consequences among these consequences russia specifically indicated the risk of thermonuclear war china has issued similar warnings as in most of the major events that we're seeing unfolding right now the real motives have nothing to do with the justification official she's given by the government in the mainstream media this has nothing to do with protecting the syrian people this much should be clear by the simple fact that nader was backed this insurgency in spite of numerous atrocities and is covering for them now even when they use chemical weapons what this really comes down to is the fact that iran is sitting on the world's third largest oil reserves and it's not  central organization and in order to achieve this very plan and out numerous quotes for this so i've put a number on the screen because the most i don't trust us i don't trust that i don't trust the other references down there they references up there will be references in of a slide so it comes from different sources he said and this was by the way under splay in the british museum and could be seen there until it was taken away in the first world war to o ninety one this war broke out in one nine hundred forty the second world war that's also written long before they went to originate between great britain and germany to strengthen communism as as anti thesis to the joad christian culture and bring about design a state in israel did achieve this objective yes in fact after this war israel in its present so that eventually every nation would be willing to surrender its national sovereignty to a war to a world government the first war was to end the sorest regime in russia or the second to allow the soviet union to control europe a third world war was to be in the middle east between muslim and jews  he pulled up a piece of paper off his desk so i just got this memo from the sector defense's office that says we're going to attack and destroy the governments and seven countries in five years we're going to start with iraq and then we're going to move to syria lebanon libya somalia sudan and iran i seventy seven countries and vive yours i says in a classified memo he said yes sir i said well don't show it to me he was about t so because i want to talk about it the right to a preemptive nuclear strike against china is now part of u s law and we've learned that the korean north korean state t v has announced that the north korea's leader has signed off on a plane to put his rockets on standby for firing at u s targets both in the pacific and right here in the u s mainland the u s government is operating on the assumption that there are three  miles worth of tunnels crisscrossing china allegedly containing three thousand nuclear warheads but i want to go right to the serious story russia putting that on ships in syria and i think you have reports that they're being joined by china and others what is going on there but we've got most of america's ballistic submarine fleet operating in the pacific also more u s ships moving in that area the pentagon a little while promising to road mobile missile would have the capacity to reach the united states that's a different type of missile from the one that was tested back in december and because it's road mobile i think that it has raised concerns combined air land and sea involving russia black sea fleet aliments air assault division fastness troops and iran and syria and to be joined by china warships from china that also includes the very likely scenario where iran and china have already received permission to pass warships through the suez canal to my knowledge this is alarming for the whole region but especially israel they're also deploy major combat elements larry i'm told air assault division combined arms division the marines from the black sea fleet are on their way to syria right now this is boots on the ground they'll be perhaps four hundred aircraft involved in addition in syria you see there making it very clear there will be no military option for the united states there is no option for the u s at all this is a severe set back for the obama administration when and if this military exercise takes place i chemical weapons in his war torn country but the united states and western allies have war in the syrian government that assad will be quote held accountable if his forces use those weapons against the rebels fighting his government now this is also the story being told to the american people that syria's stockpile of chemical weapons is dangerous and could be deadly sound familiar well if it does it that could be because you heard similar talk a decade ago in the lead up to war with iraq your country is grave the danger to our country is growing the iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons weapons of mass destruction weapons of mass destruction weapons of mass of the us every statement i make today is backed up by sources solid sources these are not assertions we're giving you are fraction conclusions based on solid intelligence well not questioning the and that solid intelligence is regarded today as one of the biggest media fails in history and yet there's a possibility we're seeing something similar with syria that this alleged movement of chemical weapons could mean the west can and should get involved this was made abundantly clear today as the latest news came out regarding the turmoil in the region it appears the syrian government is preparing its biological and chemical weapons they riklis and gave syria a warning this morning about the use of chemical weapons the possible use of chemical weapons by the syrian regime the syrian government is losing its grip on damascus and that may be part of the reason why they are preparing their chemical weapons at the gat however is clear if history serves as an indicator we might be seeing some military action sooner rather than later iran's a very large location and let's remember one of the key factors here for everyone no matter who you are they are the third largest producer of oil on the planet so if anything happens to that supply all resources all prices go up so anybody who's considering military action i don't think fully understands the secondary and tertiary effects of a military action and how danger all of it spreading much further now beyond syria's borders well if you look at the planning if you were if you were in the pentagon right now or any of the top think tanks in the u s or even a year ago the plan is build the plan is regional destabilization ok the the u s embassy has drawn up plans as far back as early this year and it's already organizing plans as far back as april to evacuate twenty thousand american citizens from lebanon and embassy staff an ngo workers ok this is this is this is really happening ok you haven't read about it but it's a long good story from beirut that is outputting now what does that mean that means they're already planning for the destabilization of lebanon washington so is this good news for lebanon no it's not ok patrick just briefly then what is the end goal for all of this regional destabilization what's the main aim here just briefly from your point of view the door is open for an attack on iran and that is the precursor to world war three as we know it is not something anybody really wants to see but it seems to me the talk out of washington and london is that they're looking in that direction so we should all be very concerned about this grim prediction and very interesting perspective thank you very much ind tolerate the commercially vital route being shut down in any shape or form we know that washington's deployed minesweepers know the naval vessels wars rarely come as a surprise to those in power almost without exception the period leading up to a physical conflict is marked by economic warfare and strategic maneuvering in public school we are top the side of history because public schools are run by the state the state has a vested interest in having a population that accepts official explanations without question right now  groundwork is being laid for a war between the united states and a block of resistant nations among these nations or china right north korea syria and iran this lead that was passed unnoticed by most of the population for two reasons one the mainstream media and the u s government intentionally obscure th political context of the events unfolding right now and to this stage in the conflict is comprised of an array of proxy wars which will have secondary consequences it can only be interested if one has a firm grasp on the strategic importance of the regions in question unfortunately we live in a time when much of the public  incapable be even finding countries like iran or syria on a map the reason the nations wishing to instigate a war make use of proxy wars and other forms of provocation rather than attacking directly largely psychological when a government wants to take its people to war they need the public to be caught by surprise when the situation escalates is the shop of an unexpected attack creates the climate needed for an outright war and this is only possible when the lead up to the crisis passes and attacked in these past months we've seen an escalation in the tensions between the united states north korea largely driven by s led sanctions in a series of military exercises conducted by the u s and south korean military drills which have been labeled full eagle simulated u s nuclear strikes and rehearsed hoarded attacks in the north this in itself was an escalation but the tensions were further heightened by the signing of a new mutual defense treaty between the united states and south korea that significantly lower the threshold required for the u s to militarily and gauge north korea north korea poses no real threat to the u s but if john yang to be lured into a fight china will be directly affected this is no trifling matter considering that china has a mutual defense agreement with north korea and has in the nuclear weapons to make north america uninhabitable this particular crisis with korea is one of many provocative measures that the u s has taken against china in recent years others include plans which will release in the india a two thousand and thirteen to target chinese military tunnels with nuclear weapons and a general policy of military and circle in southeast asia why would the us pick a fight with china why would anyone in their right mind provoke a nuclear power like this the answer to that question is the same answer you'll find when you look into the real causes of the wars in the middle east  these were militarily weak nations with no nuclear weapons not china is moving to attack the dollar and this is a game changer china of course is not announcing its attack as such its moves have been quiet and subtle but the indications are clear the most recent move came this past month when china  australia announced that they were going to be moving up the dollar for their bilateral trade in two thousand and ten china and russia made the same agreement followed by china and japan in two thousand and eleven and china and iran have worked out an arrangement that allows them to bypass the dollar entirely by exchanging chinese consumer goods for the top it all off the brics nations which include brazil russia india china and south africa have just announced in march that they're going to launch a new global development bank which will compete with the i m f and the world bank furthermore china has been buying up massive quantities of gold and taking steps to internationalize the want leading to speculation that they may be planning to transition to the gold standard these moves have massive implications china's chipping away at the dollar piece by piece in the mainstream media isn't talking about the politicians aren't talking about it and the reason is simple that the public would understand the petrodollar they would understand that there is no war on terrorism there's only a war for control of the world's financial system all this talk we're seeing right now the red lines cross in syria is part of the same game it's a proxy war to provoke syria's closest ally iran i frankly think cars initiations really tough and it's very hard for me to see how the united states president can get us to war with iraq which leads me to conclude that if in fact conference is not coming that the traditional way of america america gets to war is what would be best for us interests some people might think that mr roosevelt wanted to get us into war two was to mention you may recall we had to wait for pearl harbor some people might think mr wilson wanted to get us into a war one may recall he had to wait for the lusitania episode some people might think that mr johnson want to send troops to vietnam you may recall he had to wait for the gulf of tonkin episode that we didn't go to war with said would cause attack so if in fact the iranians aren't going to compromise it would be best if somebody else started the war but one can combine other means of pressure with actions i mentioned that explosion on aug seventeenth we could step up the pressure i mean look people iranian submarines periodically go down someday one of them might not come up who would know why we can do a variety of things if we wish t decrease the pressure i'm not advocating that but i'm just suggesting that it's this is not a either or proposition and you know it's just sanctions has to be asked to succeed or other things we are in the game of using covert means against the iranians weak we could get nastier political activist the national officer at the stop the war coalition who's in london to get his thoughts about what we're seeing unfolding in front of our eyes here i there and sanctions are often used by the west but how effective are they really are they're often criticized or no what do you th s and the e u is really trying to achieve here well i think we have to understand this is a strategic foreign policy problem that the united states has had since the failure of the war in iraq the war in iraq was meant to give them a stable pro western pro business base for operations in the middle east what they ended up doing is making iran a greater regional power than it was before and so they've got to deal with this problem and this is what the sanctions are about but the sanctions as we know in the past as we know over the case of iraq indeed were the precursor to war they were a way of preparing public opinion for military conflict and therefore they are doubly dangerous in this case they're economically dangerous in the short term but as your news china would be very glad to buy iran's all shipments if the e u refuses to so i guess by pushing for sanctions like this isn't the u s providing an extra energy source for the great global power that say there's washington's economic nemesis well this is going to be the difficulty with any military conflicts in this region in years to come you see you can look on the iraq war you can look on the afghanistan war as wars conducted by a superpower against a very small countries but the growing differentiation in the world economy the growing military might of of china the recovery of russia itself is going to lead to a situation where his not simply a conflict involving smaller powers in which the big powers want to get their way but it's going to break up any kind of international community as it's sometimes called and in which the major powers will be dragged into the conflicts as well and that's a quality early more serious situation than the ones that we've had even in the past ten years on those were serious enough  kick in here that just as we're on the brink of discovering that we haven't reached the pit of this recession but there's a lot of will to be as i think nearly every economic commentator says at the beginning of the year a very profoundly difficult year for the  eurozone in which we may see the break up of the euro in which we're certainly going to see further austerity measures pushed through by the governments in europe and in other places you would think that this wasn't exactly the moment to risk further instability in the world economy so why no progress on is the is the point i made at the beginning of this interview you see there isn't this isn't just about nuclear weapons if it were about nuclear weapons in the middle east then the united states would have a bone to pick with israel which is the only power in the middle east would actually and we begin with breaking news as more than twenty embassies and consulates are closing around the world right now and here at home increased security measures are now in place a b c news has learned this morning that the intercepted communications that led to the alert indicate terrorists are planning an attack that is going to be big and quote strategically significant yesterday the white house held then hours long meeting high level with the country's top national security officials to discuss their response to the threat and we just learned what went on at that meeting so let's go straight to john karl who is at the white house and john it sounds like the national security community is released  by this no doubt about that more of the high level meetings here at the white house over the weekend or a sign of just how seriously the u s is taking this threat in fact officials tell us they believe that there are al qaeda operatives already in place for this attack in yemen and possibly in other countries as well the cause for concern are those intercepted communications from the leadership of the al qaeda affiliate in yemen one u s official telling us quote the part that is alarming is the confidence they showed walk communicating and the air of certainty about their plans the official tells us they even talked about their media plans for after the attacks take place and one of the things that is especially concerning about the  techniques to evade western security measures specifically officials are concerned about terrorist carrying surgically implanted bombs as one u s official told us quote these are guys who have developed the techniques to defeat our detection methods john people i've talked to said they don't really know exactly what the target is even if it even if it's an embassy or consulate what do you know about that that that is exactly what they've closed those embassies and consulates more of the because they are strategically significant it would fit disk but there is no guarantee that this would be an embassy or a consulate as a u s official told us we do not know whether they mean an embassy an air base an aircraft or trains now we saw last year  h the attack on the consulate in benghazi the diplomatic outposts all right possible target but mark that there is no guarantee this time around that the target list is confined software for low level fight or flight reactions that don't require much reflection like getting a nation to go to war for example here gets the job done the state of affairs has never been lost on politicians dictators and strategist they understand that the public like a flock of sheep is often easier to crowd a given direction by having a missing dog nip at their heels and by trying to sell them on visions of wonderful green grass waiting for them on the other side of a hill especially when there is no green grass on the other side of course it wouldn't do to have the rules themselves play the role of the dog if they didn't they would be the ones that ended up fear and distrust this works for a while but it's not stable rulers like shepherds need others to play that role any bogeymen terrifying in a maze lurking in the shadows right next door in a distant land so the rulers can play the role of the valiant protector the mommy and daddy as you never outgrow don't worry you don't think your mommy and daddy the state will take care of this all you have to do is obey and such fandoms aren't readily available they're manufactured or blown out of proportion like a man turned into a science fiction monster by zooming in with a magnifying glass the specter of islamic terrorism the combination of these two manufactured and exaggerated manufactured oh please you know trying to tell me that the united states created our kind are you actually yes i am saying that this is a historical fact it's not even up for debate we also have a history of kind of moving in and out of pakistan i mean let's remember here the people we are fighting today we funded twenty years ago we funded armed and trained al qaeda in afghanistan the same way that we're currently funding arming and training al qaeda in syria right now for the same reasons some of bin laden was literally on the cia's payroll we even know his code name tim ozment documents are declassified this isn't rocket science people this information is easily available to the public if you're willing to do a little of your own research let's look at another maybe the u s funded and armed saddam hussein to assist in his invasion of iran we gave a missile technology chemical weapons precursors and biological weapons the same weapons they used against the kurds the us government knew full well what he was doing and yet he said nothing that is until they need an excuse to invade twenty years later that's what it was convenient to build up his book commands that puff up the american population with a strange mixture of fear and bravado fear because there was a big bad man who posed an imminent threat to the american bravado because mommy and daddy were going to take care of the problem with big guns and smart bombs don't you worry we'll take out that evil saddam just sit tight wave your flags and don't ask too many questions don't mind the civilians dying by the truckload don't about death and destruction let's sacrifice our freedoms to protect ourselves against these savages who hate us for our freedoms yeah that's the ticket i'm proud to be an american and because these data no i'm for you course the charade has been going on long before america's war of terror previous bogeymen was communism that red menace that was spreading across the globe like cancer our only hope was a drop democracy freedom and napalm all over the world when a good excuse to open up a can of democracy on someone s navy's own historical website knowledge is this now is a story of facts on even a point of controversy or debate at this point but if you told the truth back then you would be considered an unhinged wing that a conspiracy theorist that was thirty nine years ago now fifty eight thousand americans that were killed in the hundreds of thousands of vietnamese that were killed no matter now do they i mean who cares this is history water under the bridge what does it matter that the u s government put together detailed plans to blow up one of their own passenger jets over cuba a plan explicitly crafted to lay the blame on castro and to build public support of an invasion so called operation northwoods again it's declassified the us government doesn't deny it look it up you can find the full document easily online but really what we've been talking about this clearly this kind of thing only happened in the early days of the cia how the government has grown out of this government can be trusted right so why does this matter why are we still talking about this because it still works problem reaction solution those in power create a problem stimulate public outrage and channel it towards a solution that suits their purposes whether that be new laws to give them more power or war of aggression that they could sell if they told the truth on july twenty seventh just before friday prayers iran supremely under ayatollah ali hum in a summoned top iranian military chiefs for what he called their last war council that compiles exclusive sources disclose that he told the gathering we will be at war within weeks each of the participants was tapped to report on the readiness of his branch or sector for shouldering its contingency missions retaliation was high on the agenda but the fence was higher starting with the biggest  history for the protection of its nuclear program rocks are being gathered from afar piled on nuclear installations covered with many tons of pour concrete and finally plated with steel the strength and thickness of this armor plating are designed to hold up against u s an israeli aerial and missile bombardment they would start by announcing enhanced uranium enrichment up to sixty percent and that is close to weapons grade ballistic missiles would be loosed against israel saudi arabia and american middle east and gulf a put before his war council a timeline of weeks for the coming conflict september or october we have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order a world where the rule of law not the law of the jungle governs the conduct of nations when we are successful and we w real chance at this new world order and order in which a credible united nations peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the un's founders