weighing custody and i'll be giving his lecture explanation of the evidence at the pentagon on nine eleven this is in part answering the nine eleven consensus panel challenge that was issued in the summer of two thousand and seventeen and it's a very long lecture that will cover up a host of topics related to what happened at the pentagon on nine eleven p the copyright disclaimer here we believe that the material in this lecture constitutes fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section one of seven us copyright law and it is in the material in this presentation as it should be developed profit to those who have an interest interviewing the information for research and educational purposes as a lecture arises from the attempt to address controversy within the nine eleven truth community in december two thousand seven hundred to nine eleven consensus panel issue statement of constructive principles regarding evidence stating contributions seeking to solve contentious issues can only be made by assembling reliable evidence and by applying critical thinking and peer review according to the standard scientific process this is the strength of of science and the way it has progressed over centuries the consensus panels statement concludes with this challenge regarding the events of the pentagon because there is somewhat division of about what actually happened at the pentagon they say to end an argument it because we while maintaining differences of opinion until there's an explanation that does justice to all the various types of evidence in the opinion of the author in the peer reviewers this extensive overview provides requested explanation and does justice to the various types of evidence in this lecture just as the most controversial issue which is what mechanism caused the damage at the pentagon on nine eleven if you care enough to have an opinion about what happened at the pentagon you should care enough to know what the evidence is and what it shows but i don't in truth movement has adopted a call for implementation of the scientific method for investigating the crimes of nine collapses subsequent to structural trauma and fire speaks to the use of evidence and observations in the following video clips there is nothing wrong with developing speculative hypotheses as a starting point if the plethora of evidence supports i papa says that it may be deemed to be supported by science if contrary evidence is denied or ignored as we claimed in the nist in fim analysis then the result isn't science and may be considered a lie my name is slim marvelous i've been doing science every day since i was about sixteen using the thing that's most important outside that it's a way of knowing at the end of any kind of science activity people will agree that they have collected trying to establish it consider oh all of the elements evidence which may come from all kinds of places observations measurements and so on and insofar as people can be objective at all they will come to the same s many witnesses firemen and lots of people the slide the flowing molten metal iron or steel at extremely hot temperatures and john grows categor not deny their observations so is it because the observations don't fit his preconceived notions he not only ignored evidence he did not evidence that is exactly the opposite of science which considers all of the every evidence that can possibly be relevant and build a hypothesis based on the plethora of the total of evidence since clearly if you have to lie or deny or ignore evidence you are not doing science at all regarding the totality of the evidence of the pentagon this collection of evidence addresses the best amount of the pentagon evidence that is available its extensive and comprehensive well researching the pentagon issue over the last three years i found that passes questions focused on specific details in isolation tonight or ignore vast amounts of evidence they ignored or misrepresented the evidence they dismissed the evidence by stating it was planted regardless of the number of independent independent corroborating factors there are frequently character attacks not critiques of analysis on a recent kevin barrett show i was lauded by him by having laid out the approach that i was using and had and he said well this is what i wanted architects and engineers to do guarding the pentagon to actually look at the evidence and look at it in detail and that's kind of where premature conclusion and what a process is useful for developing and testing hypotheses ignoring or denial of evidence does not mean that that evidence doesn't exist that's basically what limits what was said when she described the work of science i'm standing on the shoulders of many others that have come before most of the early rigorous analysis that's been done has been replaced by established popular nine eleven videos many of those videos repeat for research on the pentagon and the ignore and interpret away for the audience that rigorous analysis much of this is faded into obscurity for example a section reviewing at the location of the wires fools that were photographed jim hofmann had described their initial location his observations were nowhere to be found in any of the later discussions and only the question remained where were those spools how did they get there but hoffman's analysis where they have started off was ignored this overview tries to put as much of that together in one lecture the debate about what happened at the pentagon isn't caught out for sixteen years it's been a combination of physical evidence analysis of witness witness statements analysis of the action of government personnel and institutions including the military a comprehensive primarily analysis of the damage done to the pentagon has been frequently prone to errors and misstatements new points about physical damage have been placed in a broad review of the data for example there was a tree in front of column sixteen that nobody in all the years of discussing this has addressed i actually have found a few people that have referenced it one of which you'll see it was someone who thought it was planted so to speak a tree planted and another one who comment about a tree stump standing up out of the rubble pile in front of where the collapse was we're going to look at that bastion columns on the second floor and look at the damage to one of those columns in particular column eighteen we're going to spend some time talking about the bent in both columns of nine a and the window frame the steel window frame that is next to it that's all going to be coming up in this interview will focus mostly on the physical evidence it's necessary to understand the physical damage correctly before moving on to any other hypotheses someone is accounts associate with physical observations will be addressed at the end the viewer will have an understanding of the physical event of what happened at the pentagon on nine eleven this lecture is important because an incomplete understanding of the evidence the pentagon leads to iranian's conclusions the pentagon confusion is gaining acceptance of the truth about what happened on nine eleven too many people hear no plane at the pentagon and look at the evidence and conclude that the nine eleven truth movement is incompetent and misguided the story the pentagon on nine eleven is used to keep the memory alive on nine eleven we've seen for the last half dozen years that the nine eleven anniversary is are now senator around the pentagon the world trade center to start destruction raises too many uncomfortable questions and is rarely seen has long forgotten the nine eleven truth movement has no effective counter to these remembrances and the no plane at the pentagon that we've seen trumpeted in the last couple of years doesn't help our credibility at all with a lot with the larger community out there that we're trying to talk about the events of nine eleven to chapter one overview basics what we can agree on we can all agree to the following nothing should have hit the pentagon fighter jets should have been sent to intercept and in a come incoming plane not sent in the opposite direction of incoming flight seventy seven and sent out over the atlantic ocean honey honey you're going to fly a cessna was most certainly not a pilot pilot capable of maneuvers that were observed on that day we can all agree it in the following here serial numbers of the aircraft parts should have been released the car but barbara olson to her husband ted could not have happened as reported according to evidence presented in the massai trial evidence that should have been produced has been withheld in should be released for the national transportation safety board should have better access to the crash sites of nine eleven but were not the f b i should not have cleared a lot of debris without documenting the location of major pieces and making those records available to the public recovery workers inside described the f b i military photographers documenting damage that documentation has not been released and that's like sure we have no opinion about the authentic to city of the flight data recorder the f d r was were reported to have been found in two locations at different times serial numbers have never been released how was the aircraft controlled it's improbable that h hunter could have been the pilot or some other pilot appalling process needs to be considered we have no opinion about was the aircraft actually the thing known as a flight seventy seven were there passengers actually on board we do know that barbara olson's phone call to ted olson did not occur because of the evidence presented by the government in the  trial review a forensic analysis of victims is beyond the capabilities of the general public and outside the scope of the mechanism of destruction and i can't be addressing that the focus is on what happened at the pentagon this is a big enough task for this overview lecture i don't need to speculate on who did it there are many other qualified investigators who can piece this together however if the who did it is she was affected by what actually happened that a correct assessment of what happened must be the foundation to that investigation regardless of what happened at the pentagon the question of who was behind it is an important question that needs to be answered the nine eleven consensus panel has been developing consensus points with a large team of experts to take the limited data that's available and to determine what the best points are and over the best evidence the purpose of the nine eleven consensus panel is to provide the world with a clear statement based on expert independent opinion of some of the best evidence opposing the official narrative about nine eleven the stated purpose of the consensus panel effectively practically excludes analysis of the mechanism of destruction by a large plane at the inn at the pentagon because it is in alignment with the official narrative and doesn't oppose it so they won't address it however no points contradicting a large plane at the pentagon have spin adopted there are four points that have been agreed to by the national and consensus panel regarding the pentagon to address conflicts  has the attack of the pentagon by american seventy seven under control vacated could not have been prevented for the following reasons and they list them the best evidence discrepancy in both timelines and aircraft availability challenge the given reasons for the claim that the attack on impediment pentagon could not have been prevented that's their first point and i encourage you to go to the consensus panel to see the this and the rest of their points on the other issues the second one why the attack on the pentagon was up prevented the second official account efficient account was at the mill like kerry could not have been intercepted american seventy seven the nine eleven commission reported because it never received notice that american seventy seven was hijacked the best evidence according to the according to them is that the truth of the nine eleventh's commission's second account may be questions on the following grounds which they go into the third point the claim regarding holly hunter as a flight seventy seven pilot the officials at the pentagon would be attacked according to official count critical to the success of diana levin attacks was a surprise they are going to surprise which was emphasized by the white house and pentagon officials the best evidence is that the following in the end they list that there the following evidence suggests that an attack on the pentagon was not at all unexpected before moving on i'm going to go through some orientation there's a lot of places that we'll be talking about over time and i'll go through the first of all this is a map showing the location of pentagon we have washington d c at the top the national mall white house and the capit we have the pentagon that's highlighted in this in the center we have reagan national to the south and east we have the rosalyn area we'll be hearing about the  which is north of the pentagon will have arlington national cemetery which is adjacent to the pentagon and there is of course we have twenty seven which goes along side the pentagon and then we have annex we have the sheraton hotel we have columbia pike and then we have a double the doubletree hotel and we'll see a camera shot from from there later on in the lecture along the front of the pentagon wall we have we can see the security cameras are located at the far left hand side there's a huge report control tower that is kind of in the center of heliport fire truck that's been that it will be seen backed up have a gouge in it we have the diesel generator trailer and up top right hand corner of highlighted of the tree in front of column sixteen this is a tree that disappeared from all discussions nobody ever talked about it but it actually is a huge piece of new insight as to the fact is had to be a large momentum only event there are no construction trailers presented in this particular illustration there and that's because michael pollan notes that there that they had been removed the weekend before and he says i was in the trailer the concern we called the outside area here the laydown area it's the heliport area and out there we have all of our construction trailers were in the process right prior to september eleventh the clearing out this area we moved all the trailers actually in the tents we had some of the trailers that were just leaving because they were getting ready to turn them back over to the billing one have been hardened and they have been herded with blast resistant windows you can see in the diagram in the middle we have wedge one highlighted on the right hand side it went to the left hand side the damage that was done started in which one in continue diagonally into words to something else that needs to be highlighted here is this little drawing this came from  i think was a new york times staff or somebody and they highlight what that wall is made out of and this is created a lot of confusion i was subjected to a lot of that confusion for a very long time in which they describe the walls as being  eight inches brick six inches that white stone in ten inches of concrete in the floor was five and a half inches of concrete this detail is an error and will be going through that the wall was much less significant than what you show than what shown here and that's going to be something which after additionally there's confusion about the number of walls that the impacting plane would have had to travel from the entrance area on the left which is the earring to the eight dr which is the side of the searing exit hole on the first two floors there is no intervening walls the rings that are iconic about the pentagon are only the top three floors and as shown here so for the first and second floor all that is in the way that structural between the entrance hole that as shown on the left and the exit hole on the right are the columns many of which are destroyed as the plane go travels through the building some of the misinformation that's out there is people say that there is huge steel reinforced concrete that the plane has to go into and out of an into and out of an into and out of before making the final exit hole in fact there shows column row a which juts out from the column row a which you can see is a different a different level this the damage was done to the row a which is very close to row a and it's just the place where the pentagon wall kind of juts out for several hundred feet and was pentagon debates how superimposed on the aerial photograph it can be seen that only the nose of the boeing enters the building only the nose of the plane into the building he says the fuselage and the wings remain outside the plane stopped short without its wings striking the facade no trace of impact is visible outside of the nose of the boeing so we should see the wings in the fuselage outside actually on the lawn that's what he says this is the drawing it shows he shows that the plane you know like a one brothers cartoon come to a screeching halt and only knocked the small sixteen foot hole that he says is the only damage that was vis i want to go to more later analysis called the missing wings just so that we can in fact go through some of the mislabeling that has been really problematic for much of the pentagon discussion the missing wings web page says that there be no way for the wings to enter the building without taking out any other support columns in their pants structural integrity of the wings as well as the lack of any holes on either side of the main initial entrance  hole to preclude the wings from breaking into eight foot fragments which then pass into the building individually and they assume that they should have gone over that with those gone through the windows and left no damage in any case majority of the windows on the ground floor not to mention all floors above them remained unbroken after the crash so let's see what kind of analysis and labeling this is a picture from duty and long spa shows superimposes a plane in front of the pentagon it's an elevation view show and they say it's an elevation view showing wings and engineer in relation to the building structural layout so they show the columns they show the windows they show the sixteen foot opening notice the labeling other than as i've had to call out on the right hand side where they label second floor level and the ground floor level so clearly labeled with a ground where the ground is right so here's what we kind of zoom in on it just so we're clear on what it is they've said ground level and second level possibly they just forgot to clarify so let's go take a look at this in a little more detail we have the second floor level which were clearly identified but it's really the top of what i would call the second floor level another is the third floor slab is where they've got this marked the number well they have the top but the ground floor level which is really the second floor slab based on where the opening is that is that was highlighted there's still an entire floor below this before you get down to the the ground or the landscape  now we're going to take a look at some of the other things they say about the center here at the very top it says an outline of a seven fifty seven deaths two hundred airframes and we're going to zoom into the square area there it shows there's an outline of the opening made by the seven fifty seven that's kind of the red jacket thing that's the outline of the opening made by this something that that's the only opening there is in a says don't here says the seven fifty frame indicated here at actual size relative to the building ok so so far actually technically things are all kind of right except they've kind of got up i think i will agree on the wrong floor the on line this would have been correct if they had said outline of the opening made but it's up to seven on the second floor by the upper part of the seven fifty seven fuselage but most of the fuselage wings and engines impacted the ground floor below ground floor not shown that would have made what they said said here at least technically correct otherwise by missing the stuff that's in red they've indicated that the plane actually hit them on the second floor and the third floor instead of the first floor and the second they do acknowledge that there's a fifty foot opening on the first floor it's really ninety feet because the opening doesn't end that hanging remnant of column fifteen which we'll talk about later they count it as a fifty foot opening on the first floor but then they know that information when they present the image and assert their conclusions my question is how can researches mislabel atmosphere that represent something as fundamental as which floor they're talking about are they confused and think the sixteen foot hole drawn with all the detail is on the ground floor or do they think the plane hit on the second and third floor which that's not what anyone ever said so it's really kind of baffling but we have a lot more things to be baffled about and we'll go through some of those in the next couple of next bunch of loose change this change has been estimated to been viewed by over fifty million viewers it's has been very influential it was most  eleven issues very well the world trade center twin towers building seven however the pentagon is poorly researched and poorly explained in loose change a final cut they say the pentagon's outer wall has a hole approximately twenty feet in diameter on the first and second floors and visible damage of ninety feet across the first floor if you take a look at the photo what you'll see is the first floor has missing columns the missing facade but that has all been dismissed as visible damage there's a lot more that the pentagon's outlaw had a whole approximately twenty feet in diameter on the first and second floor and visible damage so this promise bob focuses on the hole on the second floor loose change downplays the ninety foot continuous opening in the first floor facade the photo of of the destroyed first floor wall with fires seen burning deep inside is interpreted by the narrator for the documentaries viewers us expect that the narrator has looked at the issue closely and he dismisses one hundred feet of missing facade ninety feet of missing columns as visible damage ninety feet across the first floor seems like his interpret in this for the viewers is not not accurate as we'll see later in plain site one of the first videos i saw and was influenced by him trying to figure out what happened on nine eleven and in the pentagon oklahoma city bombing and of them your federal building the only thing it overlooks for the nine eleven point of view was anthrax attacks as they are a significant piece of the follow up to the nine eleven event placed misrepresents the amount of damage to the facade he says in fact there is very little evidence of a big hole big enough to accommodate a seven fifty seven that hole that we do see is approximately fourteen to sixteen across clearly to see that the area in question had not yet last in fact there is very little evidence of a hole big enough to accommodate a seven fifty seven the hole that we do  the problem is that this ignores the destruction of the hundred feet of facade on the first floor and ignores ninety feet of missing and separate columns behind the facade that isn't there anymore then he says in clip number two what could have caused this type of damage what could have caused a fourteen to sixteen hole in pierce three rings of the pentagon keep in mind that each ring of the pentagon has an outer and inner wall as we saw earlier this isn't true only on the floors three four and five are there outer wall inner and outer walls the first two floors is continuous keep he says keep in mind that each wing of the pentagon has an inner and outer an inner wall each wall is approximately eighteen inches thick of steel reinforced concrete that means that each ring consisted of thirty six inches or three feet of steel reinforced concrete for a total of approximately nine feet of steel reinforced concrete so again the first two floors are the large open street structures where there are no intervening walls walls are present on the third fourth and fifth floors there is no steel reinforced concrete present except in the original nine hundred forty one air columns the distance between the engines is forty two feet with about half of the width of the opening on the first floor again here is our cross section of the pentagon in the blue area which is the first floor which is where the ninety percent ninety or more percent of the damage was done on the first floor due to the impact we see that is a continuous except the columns that are shown there in the  are in outer rings is only relevant so the areas in floors three four and five and then he says and yet when you look at the left side of the pentagon you'll know that there is very little damage if any smoke damage or heat damage at all on the third floor is very plain to see a file cabinet with a computer monitor neither of them are damaged on the second floor you'll see it wouldn't desk it hasn't burnt and on the first floor a very curious site and you know wo stool with a book on it that's laying open the pages aren't even sins no he says it's the for part and yet when you look at the left side of the pentagon you'll know that there is very little if any smoke damage or damage at all on the third floor it's very plain to see a file cabinet with a computer monitor neither of them are damaged on the second or you can see it wouldn't death it hasn't burned and on the first four a very curious size indeed a wooden problems here the floors are mislabeled and you can see that if you go back and look at the video you'll see that he's showing an aerial view in which you can see actually all five floors floor levels floors three four and five wrongly identified as floors one two and three and how could he have made this mistake and why would he say that no significant fires reported in floors three four and five above the impact area fire damage in the area shown would kind of be an expected collapse along the expansion exposed the un burned upper floors now suck to about the film zero in zero an investigation into nine eleven the narrator says according to the official story american airlines boeing seven fifty seven disappeared inside this hole can you see it five meters i major general albert stubblebine the third someone says i look at the hole in the pentagon i look at the size of an airplane that was a post that hit the pentagon the plane does not fit in that hole why didn't they show with the sixteen foot hole instead they chose to ignore the first thirty minutes of the attack at the pentagon and to present what could be interpreted as deliberately misleading information one of my experiences in the army was being in charge of the army's imagery interpretation for scientific and technical intelligence during the cold war i measure pieces of soviet equipment from photographs was my job i look at the hole in the pentagon and i look at the the plane does not fit in the hole he says but there are no videos or lectures that are but i have been able to find where stubblebine describes in any detail what it is he sees how he explains away the hundred feet of destroyed facade and the ninety feet of severed or missing columns you see basing his inclusion on the sixteen foot hole claimed that earlier videos made claiming that those were the only openings is that where he got the idea that buck plain didn't fit in that hole let's go take a look at  this is a popular video that confuses a secret exit hole with the impact site beginning it at a point in that you video he says a photo was taken at the time so a small round punch out hole cleanly cut into the reinforced concrete this wall actually is two layers of bricks and will be going through that layer when they come to the reinforced concrete what is striking about the images is that it looks like very little damage considering a fall passenger airliners crashed here so the problem is with this it says a full passenger airline is crashed here while showing the sea ring exit hole heroically claims that the sea or being a wall is steel reinforced concrete but it's really a thin brick wall including says it looks like a missile punched hole placement of the audio and video suggests the searing exit hole is in fact the entrance hole that would be talking about the your erroneous pentagon outreach  this is a card that i remember getting at one time so those ration shows a small round hole on what appears to be the ground floor the plane enters the wings kind of fold up go through and then disappears inside leaving just a small round hole this is not very helpful in trying to figure out what actually happened to the pentagon on nine eleven because it obliterates all the discussion all the evidence there is for the hundred foot opening on the first floor the new pearl harbor pro harbor has a broken airframe assertion in the following section you know see that there's a composite image that is misleading the narration says in fact with one hundred ton airliner hitting a reinforced concrete building like the pentagon one would have expected to find a situation similar to this in the video note the brief display of the phrase composite image in small letters and also note that he's going to say a hundred tonne airliner hitting a reinforced concrete building in fact with a one hundred ton airliner hitting a reinforced concrete building like the pentagon one would expect to find a situation similar to this problem is that the illustration so hypothesize plane that crashed and split into two pieces the plane did hit the reinforced concrete building in fact it's the illustration shows that it crashed on the lawn far away from the pentagon then came to rest at least a hundred feet in front of the pentagon wall without hitting it even though he narrated to the audience in asserted that it hit the wall windows to the left of the opening but the whole segment to the left of the opening doesn't seem to have been hit by a wing traveling at five hundred miles an hour and the windows wooden frames are still in place and the glass seems to have been broken from the ensuing explosion not from the impact  the lines down covering the facade has fallen off for the bricks underneath the pier practically untouched problems with this are that first of all if the wing had zero structural integrity the wing tips might have continued forward and done so independently but the structure of the wing and connections to the engine airframe would have caused the lower  tip of the wing to be slowed and ultimately as well so later pivot around column nine a the lights are facing is attached to the wall not particularly securely i guess and he also columbine a is bowed inward at the north end of the of the opening column nine a the one behind it you can see is behind it and between the two is a window frame problem had a simulation shown the right wing about three feet lower and as will be shown later the wings for would have impacted at the intersection of the second floor slab and column e eighteen the winner in the engine would have impacted the first floor not the second floor shown in the new pearl harbor video the wing would have aligned with the second floor bashed in columns which we'll talk about and only the lightest twenty to thirty feet of the right wing tip would have impacted the windows between columns eighteen and twenty this is where if you lowered the wing in the image by about three feet here this is where it would have impacted and you can see that the columns are clearly bashed in as a column  columns eighteen to the left you will talk about column eighteen later because it is not just bashed in in that area it's also leaning to the right there's another picture of column nineteen that's been bashed in here's another image i've highlighted a couple of things here in the starting at the top of the text boxes vicinity of the second floor slab is highlighted there column eighteen is leaning inward and southward for a plane that was going northward we'll talk about why it is leaning southward col nineteen is bashed in about eighteen inches above the second floor slab and then about thirty six inches above the second floor slab column twenty you see the limestone has been damaged in this area column eighteen has been pushed about eighteen inches to the point at the intersection of column eighteen in the second floor slab around which the impacting right wing would have begun to rotate jamie mcintyre's quote is t frequently taken out of context it's in the back of their coat which many people have heard would have said it might have appeared that way but from my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the pentagon the is the actual side of the building that is crashed in as i said the only pieces left you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hands there are no large tail sections wing sections of fuselage anywhere around it which would indicate the plane crashed into the side of the pentagon and cause the side to collapse the stuff in a white is typically omitted when this is talked  about as his introduction introductory question which is important to understanding what he says in the introductory question judy says aaron one of our correspondents actually i think was bob franken was talking with an eyewitness who said that it appeared that a boeing seven seven american jet american airlines jet landed short of the pentagon can you give me any better idea how much the plane actually impacted the pentagon the building so that's what jamie pentagon can you give us any better idea of how much of the plane actually impacted the building you know it if it might appear that way but from my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crash anywhere near the pentagon the only anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the pentagon and then caused the size it collapse now even though if you look at the pictures of the pentagon you see that the course of all collapse that didn't happen immediately he wants them until a t about forty five minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed and seeing this happen is a persistent claim that much of the evidence about the pentagon is been photoshop for shopping is the persistent claim it is asserted by comparing different photographs and the differences are given ominous interpretations even though they may be from different perspectives in a different times but overwhelming cross verification exists photos are taken from many manage points taken by multiple independent photographers they were taken at different times during the pentagon event and eventually they would find their way into the pentagon research there are ways to determine photo accuracy many photos are available of the same object or event from different perspectives all you have to do is look many times or videos that are available to provide independent method to verify the offense authenticity of the photographs typically the quality isn't nearly as good as the photos but it does provide another way of looking at the the photograph and seeing whether it is consistent archives or broadcast specials are available from multiple sources th will actually even timestamp the events the real research should be done before making accusations about photoshop now here's an example of a photo shopped image that communicates the false information not only did were there no witnesses that report of the plane being eaten by a monster is an obvious fabrication if there is even a false confession here this one is an obvious fabrication now let's go talk about something a little more serious than jack white is one of the people who's done a lot of research looking at different photos and coming up with ominous interpretations and this case here we see two pictures of the fire fighting that's going on and the top photo there is a smooth new rail with the man standing in front of it but at the bottom in the bottom photo a rail with three ben places with a car is in front of it it's rusted and battered rail that's not seen the top photo only in the bottom photo he says in my opinion the backgrounds of these photos are genuine but the foreground have been added using computer technology to make them look different so let's go take a look at these particular post from a couple different  dolly photograph taken from a different perspective and now you can clearly see that there are two to that and if you are taking a picture from washington boulevard you would then most likely if you camera was lower obscure the back rail and it would look like a rusty rail in fro here's another one in which he's talking about moving props it says here the tree being on the fire truck which is kind of in the dark area there but it's highlighted in the photograph below you can see the trees  fire truck is the boy leaves and is standing tall but in the top photo it seems lying on the ground between the car and the building and i have to congratulate him on finding the tree is the only time i've ever heard any pentagon researcher talk about the tree that used to be in front of column sixteen but he misinterprets where it is because he just didn't know and he says i believe that the top photo is not shot on nine eleven but on a later day using different or move props  five all discuss the tree in front of column sixteen and show where it came from how it got there and but it tells you this is an aerial shot showing the trees in front of the facade when the impact area was you can see that the tree in front of column sixteen on the right in front of or behind the trailers and there are two trees in front of about column one that are near the fire truck weeks it can see in this picture here there's a severed tree stump and columns in front of column sixteen and you can see just how shattered it is we'll see it was the other pictures of it well the first thing i'd say to somebody who was endeavoring to join the military you know how my kids might make that choice some day i have to be willing to accept that possibility and i probably say the same thing to to them that i  d to a young man today and that would be i understand where your desire is to help your country and to protect against what you see as a threat to your way of life but unfortunately the truth is far from what you're being told and unless you're willing to look a little deeper and see what's really at play here specifically the agenda of never ending war always propping up a straw man a bogeyman to justify never ending policies of war if you're not able to see that if you're not quite able to grasp that concept then really there's not much i can say to you you're going to want to join in fight the good fight and so on and so forth i understand that you know i'm that person i've been there and i'm not saying i'm better than you smarter than you or anything like that however if anyone takes an honest look at nine eleven and specifically building seven they will realize they're being lied to and the entire system is set up to continue lying to them that tells you a lot about not only how much our government feels about us but also about what our government's really genda is and what they're really endorsing which is a never ending state of war these people are psychopaths they don't have compassion and empathy like a healthy human being does they don't care about you or me they don't care about the military they call us heroes to their media and when they don't care a shit about us at all and they certainly don't give a shit about the iraqi people or the iranian people or any people for that matter so if you want to understand the way the world functions you need to look at it from the perspective of a psychopath who is drunk on his own power now if you can get into that place and start to look at the way the world functions you're going to find that it all makes perfect sense keep in mind these people also have spent their trillions and trillions of dollars and pounds on building things such as underground compounds which i don't know if you got an invitation but i don't and these people are so nuts that they are willing in my opinion to set off a third world war look at the policies with regards to antagonizing russia what the hell are we doing we're picking a fight with a nation is russia seriously a threat to europe or the west that's just ridiculous of course or not why would you do such a thing would a sane healthy human being carry out a policy like that no no but if you're a psychopath who sees that the only way that you can maintain your position of power is to divide people then you see war is a good thing for you war is great so everything you can do to get people to fight a war against each other and keep fighting each other is good for you now if you're saying that doesn't make sense so you need to get out of your sane perspective get into the mind of a psychopath drunk on his own power and see the world that way and all of these things will make perfect sense if you have a fighting spirit if you're a warrior and you want to do if if you want to fight and fight the right cause fight the just cause fight a cause that will serve all humanity not some bogus agenda manipulated by the powers that be to get you to go fight wars for a bunch of chickenhawk cowards who will never go off and do the killing that they're ordering you to commit and they certainly won't have their children going there anyway they're a bunch of cowards i don't know why you'd give your life for these cowards