not closed on eleven thirteen fifteen the only reason why the bar association decided not to pursue it in march of two thousand and sixteen is because they didn't get a copy of the transcript of this tape and i didn't have the money to have the tape transcribed the disc and so they kept returning it to so that i give it to a court reporter and have a transcribed and then if i submitted the transcript of the hearing then they would accept the transcript and the hearing as evidence in that case now i got a letter from mr ingram didn't get to me until yesterday that's my address and mr ingram is international and he is awaiting this petition for review now i think it's very very significant that mr young knew that the victim in his case the reason why mr ingram got convicted the victim in mr young's case did not own the coroner and that was very improper for mr young to pursue that case so mr ingram asked me to submit a statement the subpoenas so that mr ingram who was pro se couldn't get it done himself and it was just really confusing because mr ingram asked to have another attorney appointed and the judge would not allow it then i told mr young that he should dismiss the case because the charging statements or correct because she the victim doesn't own the car and you can't just charge somebody with stealing a car when the victim doesn't own it and so i was a court appointed prime detective in this case and i had never been paid i worked on it for a few months last year in september of last year mr douglas young who is the prosecutor i saw him out in the hallway threatening one of the witnesses he said well we'll get to you later he just kind of threatened him and i did a complaint with the bourse o c a sion about the fact that mr young knew when he charged this guy with stealing a car that his witness who was interviewed couldn't even remember who she bought it from she didn't even remember where she got the car and in fact when you run the plates on the chorus she doesn't even own it some other people in redmond o denied due process he's been denied equal protection under the under the law and i understood the constitutional rights to due process and i signed this and i mailed it off to everyone the court the prosecutors and i'm just curious concerned about the ferric that both mr kim who is in the prosecutor's office and mr young in the prosecutor office both of them knew that the church documents on this case were inaccurate and not accurate and they proceeded on this case and this poor gentleman got convicted of this crime and the problem is they're they didn't know who she bought the car from and their victim in fact doesn't own the car and then a short time after the trial she was in jail herself so she didn't want to come to court they had to go and get her to come to court she didn't come to court the first day she was supposed to be in court and she didn't know who she bought the car from because in fact she never did buy the car the registration  mr douglas kaye young the prosecutor's bar complaint number one five zero one eight four and it was dismissed because i didn't file the transcript of this very very important hearing the case i'm talking about is one five one zero five zero seven zero zero nine and the hearing was eleven thirteen fifteen and at that hearing it came up again that the victim didn't own the car and that there was a bar complaint pending on the subject and that mr young had responded to my board complaint at that hearing on eleven thirteen fifteen mr yo made a false statement to the court kandor to the tribunals he told the board the court that the boers was you know drop the complaint when in fact the board association had not dropped a complaint the complaint was pending at the hearing on eleven thirteen fifteen so i am hoping and this is an interesting case i hope you guys pay attention to this case and if you want to write to mr ingram m dance one he was beat up in jail and he's almost lost an eye and he's trying to recover and he's hoping that they allow this petition and he asked me to write it and to send it to susan carlson who is the clerk of the court so she can get it filed so just keeping you up to date on the ingram case and on the fact that the birth complaint against mr young has been dismissed and it was dismissed because i didn't file transcripts i have a copy of the hearing that was a very very significant hearing  thank you very much for watching public interest issue and we hope that the supreme court takes it and has it in their heart to allow mr ingram his day in court his p t of robert ingram is under this pressure court case number three nine three four seven six two i'm hoping that they accept it and then hoping that they give him his day in court so he can be appointed an attorney to look through this file because it's disturbing how many errors are in this file and how much legal representation this poor man didn't get and so it's a mystery room and