brought this is being brought to you by the general welfare process ok so in this episode i'm going to talk about something most people have heard of and it's very important at this time in history it's something that lyndon la rouche refers to ask placement now there's many different aspects of placement  the first aspect is the placement of the voice of the person in the mind it's such a way that it speaks to truth then there's a placement in the imagination of the participation in the chorus where in imagination the voice is seeking the voice of being instructed to  modulating with the other voices to to render a conception that the composer of a composition has created but this is not the notes this is this is the idea of the composition in the mind of the performers who are having to to work together and me being a community a kind of a dialogue a musical dialogue but it's not a dialogue it's a in this it's a speaking able to tune to sense where the other members of the chorus are and how you have to complete how you complete it now this concept of placement is very very important in in in the nature of a true dialogue between individuals the concept of placement is you put yourself in and in this position in the imagination of being truthful and there is a just dialogue going on around a concept is being developed and that concept is not completed by the individual but is completed in the process of the dialogue and when you have a conversation which has in which the conversion those in the conversation have placement they are not trying to one upmanship or they're not trying to show off they're not trying to be literal each other they're not trying to go stream of consciousness you know based on you know you say one word and then you have a whole story on that one word and then another no word and then you have an oh rather they're trying as a as a group to come to an idea that's being developed to phil phil fulfill that the concept that is not spoken is not said but it's there and those of you who've had don't kind of conversations know that there's a certain intensity there's a certain focus and there's a certain collaboration in reaching the concept that the other person is trying to even if you disagree with the other person you want them to be able to express the concept is best develop the concept ok and even though you may disagree with that concept and then and then you're hoping that the other person will help you develop your concept and then you can compare both concepts that that form of placing oneself in the imagination of truthfulness and imagination of the sincerity of wanting to understand not only what the other person is saying but to understand what you're trying to get at which otherwise is very hard to articulate so you have other people in the conversation with you to articulate a concept now that causes it to some degree has to be a concept that is necessary or has to be some degree  concept of that is at least important to the individual involved the development of that concept so that's that's a conversation now and that kind of conversation is the only kind of conversation you can actually have truthfulness you may not arrive at the truth but you have a sense of truthfulness and it's also the only kind of conversation where you have actual human or human quality to it and it and it mirrors the the quality of of a classical chorus and it mirrors  quality of of a real conversation and ok so the next level on this is that this kind of conversation is the essence of government in other words if you don't have people involved in that kind of conversation over the nation over what is best for the nation or what is the good what is the general welfare what is the commonwealth what is the necessarily for the nation or what is the best thing to do for the community or the nation what have you if you don't have that quality of conversation were people from different points of view and different orientations are working to try to figure it out and they're trying to develop their ideas on on this if you don't have that kind of a dialogue if you don't have the kind of concept you really don't have a government you really don't have a functioning government right it's not functioning well and if you don't have some of that going on in the congress if at least behind the scenes you don't have a functioning congress and most of all if you don't have that process going on centered around the presidency you don't have a functional presence and this people become very important now in the in the case of donald trump who is currently president and he's definitely not committed to the policies of his predecessors but how does he shape the policies of the future he cannot just issue dictate and say well we want to do this we want to do that it doesn't work telling there has to be a conversation and that conversation has to increasingly include larger areas of the society that conversation has to include democrats it has to include conservatives it has to include business people it has to include labor people it has to include all cries of different people that's on the domestic level and on the on an international policy level that conversation needs to include major world leaders which will where are we taking that the nation where are we taking the planet what is the relationship of my nation to the future of the planet i mean this is very important because  probably is not going to be able to make a positive policy unless that kind of discussion is going on internally in the united states and also extremely with other with other leaders and that is the basis of government it's not the that is the basis of government is this placement of oneself in the future of where things must go and i what basis do we know that those things are necessary or not necessary ok this is very very important now liniment roshan how delusion has spent most of their life from the standpoint of what is it that is necessary both in terms of the relationships between nations as well as the domestic policy of the united states but also what is necessary for the human race in terms of creating a future and that future cannot be the same static society but it has to be a developing society with increasing productive power per capita with increasing development of science and technology and with an increasing level of culture of the individual and also an increasing population does view is where things must go it's different from allowing the invisible hand of the monetary system to to to rule or to determine where things m it is different and the situation where we have lived system end of world war two where we have lived in fear of the soviet union we were now living in fear of russia and china were living in fear of terrorism we're living in fear of everything of immigrants but you can't you can't have that placement of the individual in that in that imaginary place where you're actually considering  policy if you're terror if you're fearful if you're if you're completely motivated by base instincts if you're just motivated by greed or or or or you  know ambition or career you will you are not placed because you're not placing yourself in that position of a conceptual responsibility for for the course or for the dialogue or for the nation or for the policies or for whatever you're not a you're not really functioning in a place in that sense and the issue placement is very important for if you are placed properly you have courage why do you have courage because you know you know that no matter what happens things have to go just right way why do things have to go this way because of they don't call it that way society is going to be destroyed there's going to be a disintegration of where who are you to even think that you did that that you have that that quality of knowledge of that quality will know you have a quality of placing yourself in that position in the imagination similar as in the course or a conversation where you're seeking the truth you're seeking what is the good you're seeking what is necessary ok now how many times have had the individuals watching this tried to develop a concept and somebody says get to the point or they say wait it out or they say you know or they they completely trust you down because they don't want to participate and that they don't want themselves to be placed in a placement where they can have that dialogue which we live in a society where people are more afraid of the put down and being being put down because they're there they're genuine and they're trying to develop a concept or an idea it's very hard to do and if you watch the media if you watch how they treat people in interviews if you watch the talk shows and a very it's very controlled and you you try to develop an idea of this outside of the box of what they're creating whether it's left or right conservative or liberal or whatever but then get shut down you get shut down they don't want they don't want that it's not just it it's not that they don't want you to say what you're going to say that's secondary estate don't want to have a   mental issue of placement and but you can have real truthful this dialogue without that prop without that being being done now there's another aspect to placement which is the issue of history where you place yourself in history well that means you have to have a context arch our youth are not getting a very good sense of history of world history or you or us history or or even even a wrong sense of history even a false sense of history not even getting that because if you have a false sense of history you can at least you have a framework to to reexamine the phosphorus of your sense of history that you realize oh i've been i've been all i see didn't really was this way no they don't carrying any sense of history so there's no context in which to put themselves in the imagination as part of history but put themselves in imagination as part of history but if you're if you are a political person and you you you you want to do good you have to put yourself in history where are we now what has gone wrong that has brought us to this point what do we have to do to change it and where do we have to go and who do we have to go with what nations we have to work with how many people out there are thinking like that the average person is the average person thinking like that is the average person putting themselves in that historical imagination and that historical place of representing history history is not something made by by just blind forces the british historians will try to tell you that that you know thing like that no history is made by people who put themselves in the position of looking to the future both in both in terms of the negative aspect of reducing the world's population down to one or two billion and imposing certain conditions but also people who haven't who have another different kind of placement histories made by by those people those people are making history because they're clear there's an intention there's an intention to create the direction the british monarchy and the european aristocracy and their allies and the forces of data ploy in the financial system they have an intention they have a long term intention of bringing the world's population down to one or two billion people reducing it to a pop up almost a pre industrial level qua industrial level and that is their intention and they are placing their activity in there placing themselves in the position of how to carry it out that is the long term perspective of it not necessarily that many people in the oligarchies or in the monarchy or in the who are actually doing that but they don't want to have the intention and right now their intention is if it's in deep question because obama is no longer there day that will bomb was there an extension of their intention and trump is not an extension of their intention and and  and and everything isn't isn't working out which he's he's he's developing a relationship with china leader saying he's about to develop a relationship with putin and if  playing have discussions with trump which are which have this quality of placement where they're actually talking about what is the best thing to do for the united states for russia for china that's that's what that's a different place that's a different kind of placement right and so you have you have donald trump coming out with shocking you know the media shocking the establishment by saying that under certain circumstances he would be honored to meet with calling him a friend of dictators but that's not the point the point is is that this came about as a result of his dialogue with pain so he's actually working which dishing pain that's part of what what's happening is that he's working w pain and whether they will resolve that situation get north korea to agree to abandon its nuclear program and stop its missile tests and exchange for the necessary support an economic development that they require remains to be seen i can guarantee you that every effort is going to be made by the british and their friends in the united states the clinton crowd the obama crowd directed the but but but if you have how many intention of the good you have an intention of the what the better future would be you want to not have to live under the terror of north korea for being fearful of it being put in a box and being  fearful and and and so forth where you where you will give all to made him so north korea which only makes it worse and that's why it's intended to do because it's the manipulation of the north korean situation which is allows for the disruption of the one bell one roll out of the one of the development of north that the north eastern part of eurasia so so if trump is well meaning and he's in a discussion he's in a dialogue with with with  probably will make a lot of mistakes but it's very important that the leadership of russia and china give him slack it's very important they try to engage him in in a dialogues as well in a discussion where people where the placement is over the question of what is best for the human race what is best for your nation so it's in that context that you can look at figures like lincoln r john f kennedy martin luther king you can look at figures in history they were placed they had a sense of placement they were not pessimistic to optimism why do they have to optimism when everything around them was garbage while they had to optimism because they had a placement they had a sense of where things had to go no matter how but how bad it looked for them going in that direction it didn't matter because they had a sense of placement that's where it has to go and you don't compromise with that never compromise down on where things had to go and  when he was in prison and his wife and his wife helga was very much involved in europe they put together the the plan after communism collapsed to develop all of eurasia and that plan was understood that the future of humanity dependent upon building the bridges economic bridges to unify all of eurasia and develop all of eurasia and then down from that development you would have not only peace but he would also have a future but you also have a dramatic improvement of the life of all of the people of asia and africa and the middle east and europe that was understood that was what was presented and it only it was only in two thousand and thirteen four years ago that the president of china decided to go with that policy with that program and now it's taking off and the entire world is starting to order you to that but that's what i fusion energy foundation i got time we knew that ultimately the world had would have to develop fusion power to be able to have the means to travel in space and have the abundant energy beyond fossil fuel that would allow for human civilization to flourish and prosper and in one thousand eighty seven the federal government shut down the fusion energy foundation which had a magazine called fusion which had a circulation in the hundreds of thousands and it was a very very political issue to shut down our government shut it down because under the under the bush administration bush under the the reagan administration which had been taken over by the bush crowd the latter part they take they  shut the thing now so that's what i mean by placement we did it was understood that that's where we had to go and it was understood that we had to organize support for that and the fusion energy program was and that really got  funding got cut dramatically there was a bill that was put in the congress and seventy nine but it is in the past but it but it does shut the whole thing got shut down it was never really went with the level of funding and commitment that is would be would be required because you're talking about a huge huge program i mean you're talking about something that we're transforming managing on the most profound level but that's what i mean by placement placing yourself in the future saying where most humanity go where's the best possible direction that humanity must go now if you human beings can do and new species coming in and we see more energy efficient species like mammals versus reptiles versus amphibians and more developed species of fish replacing earliest or lesser dev species was is the universe also based on a sense of where something somewhere to go and can be human species if so can the human species can human individuals can human individuals who are poor leaders harmonize themselves to that to their concept of where the universe must go this but but are but the british empire does is completely based on disrupting the ability of of our  that it's not based on in the media backs that up it's not based on where we must go and we've got to have to start having discussion within hours so the story about where the nation must go and i think you know and then