well thank you very much and i want to thank the organizers for this really superb conference the two lectures this morning i would like to associate myself one hundred percent with the comments of the title of my lecture is the building what house gad can be hidden in plain sight at five twenty one pm on nine eleven building seven of the world trade center collapsed even though it had not been hit by a plane a fact that is important because of the widespread acceptance of the idea in spite of its scientific absolute a t that the twin towers collapse because of the impact of the airplanes and in the jet fuel fed fires the collapse of building seven thereby challenge the challenges the official account of the destruction of the world trade cent according to which it was accomplished by al qaeda hijackers even if you do except the scientifically impossible explanation given by the government this fact was most recently stressed in the title of a book review of my latest book a mysterious collapse of world trade center seven by medal of science winner lynn margulis in the title of her review to hit three down the biggest lie the reason why building seven poses such a problem to the official theory that this encounter entails that for the first time in the known universe a steel framed high rise building had been brought down by fire and science does not like unprecedented occurrences when dealing with physical phenomena new york times writer james glanz who himself has a ph d in physics wrote experts say no building like at a modern steel reinforced high rise had ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire glance then quoted a structural engineer as saying within the structural engineering community building seven is considered to be much more important than the twin towers because engineers had no answer to the question why did seven come down equally remarkable besides the mere fact that the building came down was the way it came down  virtual freefall making it appear to be an example of the type of controlled demolition known as implosion and which explosives and or incendiaries are used t the building's steel support columns in such a way as to cause the building to collapse in upon itself into its own footprint c b s anchor dan rather not one to let a remarkable fact go unremarked sad it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen on television who are a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down dan rather moreover was not the only reporter to make such a comment al jones reporter for a new york city news station said i turned in time to see what looked like a skyscraper implosion looked like it had been done by a demolition crew moreover where jones and rather being layman in these matters merely said that the collapse of building seven looked like a controlled demolition experts looking at the video could see that it was a controlled demolition in two thousand and six for example a dutch filmmaker asked danny yo winkle the owner of a controlled demolition company in holland to comment on a video of the collapse of building seven without telling him what it was you know winkle had never heard that a third building had come down that day after viewing the film you winkle sad they simply blew up columns and the rest caved in afterwards this is controlled demolition when asked if he was certain your winkle replied absolutely it's been imploded there's was a higher job a team of experts did this the sides the obvious now from the very appearance of the collapse that had been brought down by explosives there were testimonies about explosions in world trade center seven one of these was provided by michael house new york city's corporation counsel and very good friend of mayor rudy giuliani while on his way back to city hall has was stopped for an interview at eleven fifty seven that morning during that interview he said i was in the emergency management center on the twenty third floor of world trade center savin when all the power went out and another gentleman i walked down to the eighth floor he meant to sext where there was an explosion and we were trapped on the eighth floor they went back up with smoke thick smoke all around us for about an hour and a half but the new york fire department just came and got if out has thereby reported a midmorning explosion in building seven the other gentleman very jennings of the new york city housing authority reported the same thing during another man on the street interview reporting that he and mr hess had been walking down the stairs when they became trapped by a big explosion jennings in fact said that explosions continued going off in the building while they were waiting to be rescued also during the late afternoon reporter peter de marco of new york daily news said there was a rumble the building's top row of windows popped out in all the windows on the thirty eighth floor then thirty ninth floor then the thirty eighth floor pop pop pop was all you heard until the building sunk into a rising cloud of gray in addition to the visual and testimonial evidence there was clear physical evidence that building seven was brought down by explosives within a few months of nine eleven three professors from worster polytechnic institute had issued a report about a piece of steel from this building that was described a new york times story by james glanz and eric lipton as perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation part of the mystery was the fact that the steel had become extremely  indicating that the steel had melted away even though no fire in the building was believed to be hot enough to melt steel outright describing this mysterious piece of steel more fully an article entitled the deep mystery of melted steel in the worchester polytechnic institute worst or polytechnic institute magazine that steel which has a melting point twenty eight hundred degrees fahrenheit may weaken and bend but does not melt during an ordinary office fire yet a one inch column has been reduced to a half inch thickness its edges which are curled like a paper scroll have been thin to almost razor sharp miss gaping holes some larger than a silver dollar let light shine through a formally formerly solid steel fla the swiss cheese appearance shocked all of these fire wives professors who expected to see distortion and building been doing but not holes indeed the thinning in the holes suggested t steel had been vaporized explaining as early as november two thousand and one why fire could not account for this mysterious steel glance paraphrased one of these three professors as saying it appeared to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures another new york times story reported this isn't the same phenomenon was announced by professor haas in austin  all of the university of california at berkeley who had received a national science foundation grant to spend two weeks at ground zero studying the steel according to reporter kenneth chang's professor austin all's well speaking of the horrors of a horizontal i beam from world trade center sad and sad parts of the flat top of the eye once five eighths of an inch thick vaporized these reports clearly showed that something other than fire had caused effects because the fires in the building could not possibly have been hotter than eighteen hundred degrees fahrenheit while the boiling point of steel is roughly the same as that of iron which is over five thousand degrees fahrenheit but even if the steel had simply melted that by itself would have proved the point because the melting point of steel is only a little less than that of iron which is twenty eight hundred degrees fahrenheit whereas the fire to repeat could not even under the most ideal circumstances have been above eighteen hundred degrees fahrenheit therefore clear evidence against the official account of building seven according to which it was brought down by fire existed in plain sight in the form of memories and videos of its collapse testimonies about explosions and physical evidence reported even in new york times the reasonable inference to draw from this evidence namely that the official account is fault because explosives were used was reinforced by the first official report on world trade center seven which was issued in two thousand and two by fema the scientists who wrote the report for fema admitted that their best hypothesis as to why the building came down had only a low probability of occurrence which is science speak for we don't have a clue and addition to all these facts world trade center seven was a very big building being forty seven stories high although it was dwarfed by the hundred ten story twin towers it would in half of the states in our nation then the tallest building in the state for all of these reasons the collapse of this building should have become one of the best known facts about nine eleven but it did not as ugly poll in may two thousand and six found that forty three percent of the american people were still unaware that world trade center seven had collapsed and that same year as mentioned earlier daniel winkle of holland still did not know about it even though this was his field of expertise a dramatic example of the fact that this building collapse has not been prominent in the public consciousness was provided in a new york city courtroom in september two thousand and nine judge edward lainer was hearing arguments about a petition sponsored by new york city can to allow residents to vote on whether new york city should have its own investigation of the world trade center attacks after judge lane or observed that the nine eleven commission had already investigated nine eleven and had issued a report dennis mcmahon a lawyer for new york city can said the just report had left many unanswered questions one of the biggest questions he added is why did building seven come down at which point judge lean or sad building what man replied world trade center seven there were three buildings that came down when the judge continuing to illustrate his ignorance about this building ask if it was the one owned by the port authority that plant judge lane or it should be emphasized is not simply an ordinary american citizen besides being a judge who was presiding in new york city he was assigned to a case involving the nine eleven attacks in this city ignorance about this building was surprising and yet it was typical with his query building what he expressed ignorance manifested in two thousand and six by controlled demolition daniel winkle and almost half of the american people how can we account for this widespread ignorance in a new york times story in november two thousand and one james glanz wrote that the collapse of world trade center seven was a mystery that under normal circumstances would probably have captured the attention of the city and the world clearly these were not normal circumstances part of the abnormality was the fact that building seven while huge was overshadowed by the twin towers which were over twice as tall but this fact by itself would not account for the enormous ignorance because as people indicated at the time as glance pointed out there were reasons why the collapse of seven should have been an even bigger story than the collapse of the towers why was it not the answer seems to be that it was a deliberately suppressed story this conclusion is supported by the following facts first after nine eleven itself o television networks played videos of the twin towers being hit by the planes and then collapsing over and over and over but the collapse of building seven was seldom if ever shown again on mainstream television it's not that when the nine eleven commission report was issued in two thousand and four it did not even mention the collapse of this building third afternoon the national institute of standards for standards and technology took over from fema the task of explaining the destruction of the world trade center site world trade center it repeatedly did late its report on building five and over and over in two thousand and three nist said that this report would be issued along with its report on the twin towers the drafter which was to appear in september two thousand and four however even though nist report on the twin towers did not actually appear in till two thousand and five the promised report on building seven was not included nist said it would appear in two thousand and six but when august of two thousand and six came nist said it is anticipated that a draft report on world trade center seven will be released by early two thousand and seven but it was not released in two thousand and seven whether early or late nist instead projected that it would release draft reports on july eighth two thousand and eight followed by final reports in august of that year and stead the draft report did not appear until august and the final report not until november of two thousand and eight when the bush cheney administration was about to leave office moreover in two thousand and eight when this was accused of having deliberately delayed this report it live saying that it had worked on this report only since two thousand and five and hence for only three years the same amount of time it had worked on the report of the twin towers however nist had filed progress reports on world trade center seven in december two thousand and two and may two thousand and three in june two thousand and four it published an interim report and in april two thousand and five it released another preliminary report then after seizing work on this building evidently while finishing up their report on the twin towers in two thousand and five nist then sa investigation of world trade center seven resumed in truth therefore nist had worked on its report on building seven for almost six years not nearly three so there is good reason to suspect that it had been deliberately delayed and in any case when the draft for public comment did finally appear in august two thousand and eight it was announced at a press conference with much  nist lead investigator investigator for the world trade center said our take home message today is that the reason for the collapse of world trade center seven is no longer a mystery or trade center seven collapsed because the fire is fueled by office furnishings it did not collapse from explosives the mainstream media for the most part simply repeated sunders claims for example an associated press story entitled report fire not bombs leveled world trade center seven building began by saying federal investigators said thursday they have solved the mystery of september eleventh they collapse of world trade center seven building seven source of long running gun spirity theories then after reinforcing this message by quoting that the reason for the collapse of world trade center seven is no longer a mystery this story concluded by quoting sunders claim that the science behind this finding is incredibly conclusive so that the public should really recognized that science is really behind what we have said however reporters could have easily discovered that this was not so they could have seen in fact that nist world trade center seven report committed scientific fraud in the technical sense as defined by the national science foundation one type of fraud is false of the caisson which includes omitting data nist while claiming it found no evidence of a controlled demolition event simply amid an amount of evidence that explosions had brought world trade center seven down besides failing to mention the testimonial evidence discussed earlier nist report on this building omitted various types of physical evidence take for example the piece of swiss cheese steel reported by the three professors this was included as an appendix to the two thousand and two fema report and after describing this piece of steel the professor said a detailed study into this mechanism the mechanism of this phenomenon is needed when this took over from fema the responsibility of explaining the destruction of the world trade center nist director promised that its report would address all major recommendations contained in the fema report however when nist report on building seven appeared in two thousand and eight it did not even mention this mysterious piece of swiss cheese steel indeed nist even claimed that no ste from building seven was identified another example deutsche bank which had a building close to the world trade center that had been contaminated with dust hired the r j lee group a scientific research organization to prove to its insurance company that the dust contaminating its building was not ordinary building dust as the insurance company was claiming but had resulted from the destruction of the world trade center the reports issued by the r j lee company prove that the dust was indeed world trade center dust because it had its unique chemical signature part of the signature was theory c iron particles and this meant the r j lee lee group said that iron had melted during the world trade center event producing spiritual metallic particles the r j league group also found that temperatures had been reached at which lead would have undergone vaporisation meaning over three thousand degrees fahrenheit hence the r j leave reports which were issued in two thousand and three and four provided additional evidence that temperatures had been reached that significantly exceeded those that could have been produced by fire these reports which were made known in an article published in january two thousand and eight by a group of scientists led by physicists even jones or simply ignored by nest another study was carried out by scientists at the u s geological survey which is a government agency that sides all full finding iron particles these scientists found that something had melted molybdenum which has an extremely high melting point almost five thousand degrees fahrenheit although these scientists failed to mention this discovery in the published version of their report the stephen jones group having obtained their data through  pointed out that that these u s geological survey scientists had devoted considerable study to this particle of malignant so they didn't just over look at look at it they had suppressed this information nist however failed to mention this discovery even though it was by another federal agency still another example a report by stephen jones and several other scientists including university of copenhagen chemists niels herit showed that the world trade center dust contained it on reacted nano thermite unlike ordinary  is an incendiary nano thermite is a high explosive this report by harriet jones and their colleagues did not appear until two thousand and nine so missed in two thousand and eight could not have mentioned it however given the standard guidelines for investigating fires they definitely should have checked the dust for evidence of thermite and as various forms including including was no evidence of that when she asked the obvious follow up question how can you know there's no evidence if you don't look for it first he replied if you're looking for something that isn't fair you're wasting your time and the taxpayers money but sides omitting evidence when i gave that made that statement in that cambridge the other night lynn margulis of the audience and see piped up this is the first time they've ever shown any concern about wasting the taxpayers money evidence partly by simply refusing to look for it nist also committed a type of scientific fraud called fabrication which means simply making up results for example and offering its explanation as to how fire caused building seven to collapse it is said that the culprit was thermal expansion which means simply that the fire heated up the steel in it expanded expanding steel beams on the thirteenth floor nist claims caused a steel girder connecting columns forty four forty four and seventy nine to break loose having lost its support column seventy nine failed starting a chain reaction that lead all eighty one other columns to fail now you're in the question of whether that's even remotely possible let's just focus on the issue why did that girder fail and this answer was in world trade center seven have shear studs however this interim report on world trade center seven which was issued back in two thousand and four before it had developed this girder failure theory had said that serious studs were used to anchor most of the beam so angered hers including the particular girder and question another example of fabrication although in its two thousand and four interim report nist had said that by four forty five pm that day the fire on floor twelve was burned out it claimed in its two thousand and eight report that at fifteen minutes later five o'clock just fifteen twenty one minutes before the building collapse this fire was still going strong both of these examples of fabrication and incidentally were discovered by chris burns who is here today chris where you stand up you deserve applause for that besides omitting and fabricating evidence nist affirmed a miracle meaning a violation of a basic law of physics this issue was treated in a cartoon many of you have seen the professor is up on the board in writing formula x times why was this and this and that one of the lines simply says then americal happens and this is funny because that's one thing you absolutely cannot do in a scientific report as a firm americal and yet this is what nist does explain members of the nine eleven truth movement had from very early on having seen the video saying that buildings coming down in freefall or at least very close to it but missed constantly the nine deaths in its draft report of august two thousand and eight nist said that the time it took the upper floors meaning the only ones you could see on the video to come down was approximately forty percent longer than the computed freefall time and was consistent with physical principles as this statement implies any assertion that the building did come down in freefall would not be consistent with physical principles meaning the laws of physics explaining why not sean cinder himself said a freefall time would be the fall time of an object that had no structural component below it the time it took for those seventeen floors to disappear was roughly forty percent longer than freefall and that is not at all unusual because there was structural resistance that was provided all that steel and concrete and you had a sequence of structural failures remember seventy nine and causes all those other columns to fall you had a sequence of structural failures that had to take place everything was not instantaneous and saying this under was of course presupposing nist rejection of controlled demolition which could have produced a freefall collapse by causing all eighty two columns to fail simultaneously in favor of nist fire theory which of course necessitated a theory of progressive collapse in response high school physics teacher david chandler challenge sunders denial of freefall pointing out that sunders forty percent claim contradicted a publicly visible easily measurable quantity chandler then placed a video on the internet showing that by measuring this publicly visible quantity anyone knowing elementary physics dig dig anyone knowing elementary physics could see that for about two and a half seconds the acceleration of the building is indistinguishable from freefall amazingly in this final report which came out in november two thousand and eight it admitted freefall dividing the building's descent into three stages nist described the second phase as a freefall descent over approximately eight stories at gravitational acceleration for approximately two point two five seconds so they just quibble about a quarter of a second so after presenting over six hundred pages of descriptions photographs testimonies gra analyses explanations and mathematical formula nist says in a fact then americal happens why this would be a miracle it was explained by chandler who i also think is here today the one guy in the world i believe who made nist change something between the first report and the second  one david chandler said freefall can only be achieved if there is zero resistance to the motion in other words the upper portion of building seven could have come down in freefall only if something had suddenly removed all the steel and concrete in the lower part which would have otherwise provided some resistance if everything had not been removed and the upper floors had come down and free while freefall anyway even if only for a quarter of a socket that would have been a miracle meaning a violation of basic laws of physics that was what sunder himself had explained the previous august saying that a free falling object would be one that has no structural components below it to offer resistance but then in november while still defending the fire theory of the collapse nist agreed that as an empirical fact free fall happened for a period of two and a quarter sockets nist admitted the descent of world trade center seven with characterized by gravitational acceleration freefall knowing that it had thereby a firmed a miracle nist no longer claim that its analysis was consistent with the laws of physics in its august draft in which it said that the collapse occurred forty percent slower than freefall nist had repeatedly said that its analysis was consistent with physical principles readers encountered this phrase time and time again but in the final draft every instance of this phrase had been removed in the final report therefore almost explicitly admitted that its report on world trade center seven by admitting freefall while continuing to deny that explosives were used is not consistent with the laws of  physics this thereby implicitly admitted that explosives were used to bring down building seven and without implicit admission nist implicitly admitted that the same about the twin towers the collapses of which manifested many of the same telltale signs of controlled demolition including plus some additional ones such as the horizontal objection of steel beams outward some five hundred six hundred feet and with this implicit admission that explosives were used nist undermined the al qaeda theory of nine eleven why for one thing the straight down nature of the collapse of the twin towers and building seven means that the buildings were subjected to that type of controlled demolition known as implosion which in the words of a controlled demolition website is by far the trickiest type of explosive project which only a handful of companies in the world possess and experience to perform al qaeda terrorists would not have had the expertise sakit the only reason to go to the trouble of bringing the building straight down is to avoid damaging nearby buildings had the world trade center buildings toppled over sideways they would have caused massive destruction in lower manhattan killing many tens of thousands of people does anyone believe that if even alkie if al qaeda operatives had had the expertise to bring the building straight down they would have had the courtesy a third problem is that foreign terrorists could not have obtained access to the buildings for the all the hours it would have taken to plant explosives only insiders domestic terrorists could have done this this admission that building seven came down in freefall for over two seconds should therefore have been front page news the same is true moreover of the various other things i've reported news fabrications nist omission and distortion of testimonial evidence nist omission of physical evidence such as the swiss cheese steel and the particle showing diot iron and  had been melted and the later discovery of nano thermite particles in the world trade center doused especially given the fact that the collapse of world trade center seven had been declared a mystery from the outset the world should have been waiting with bated breath for every new clue as to why this forty seven story building had come down upon hearing building seven mentioned nobody in the world with access to c n n should replied building what how do we explain the fact that five and even nine years after nine eleven the mysterious collapse of this building was still a matter of widespread ignorance the very fact that it had collapsed to begin answering this question let us turn to james glances statement that the collapse of world trade center seven was a mystery that under normal circumstances would have captured the attention of the city and the world as i stated before the abner malady seems to have been such that the fact of this building's collapse and specifically the videos of this collapse were deliberately suppressed what was this abnormality a symposium in the february two thousand and ten issue of american behavioral scientist one of our leading social science journals argues that social scientists need to develop a scientific approach to stunning and increasingly important type of criminality state crimes against democracy abbreviated scads understood as concerted actions by government insiders intended to manipulate democratic processes and undermine popular sovereignty having the potential to subvert political institutions and entire governments scads are high crimes that attack democracy itself distinguishing big between scabs that have been officially proven such as the water break watergate break ins and cover up the secret wars in laos and cambodia the legal arms to illegal arms sales and covert operations in iraq and iran contra and the effort to discredit joseph wilson by revealing his wife's status as an intelligence agent and suspected scads of distinguishing those from suspected scads for which there is good evidence the symposium authors include in the latter category the fabricated and robert kennedy the election breakdowns in two thousand and four two thousand and two thousand and four the numerous defense failures of september eleventh two thousand and one and the misrepresentation of intelligence to justify the invasion and occupation of iraq moreover besides regarding the nine eleven attacks as one of the suspected scad for which there is good evidence this impose him treats  in fact as its primary example the abstract for the introductory asked i begins by asserting the ellipses of due diligence riddling the official account of the nine eleven incidents continue being ignored by scholars of policy and public administration the symposiums final acis essay criticizing the majority of the academic world for its blith dismissal of more than one law of thermodynamics that is violated by the official theory of the world trade center collapses also criticizes the academy for its failure to protest when professor steven jones found himself forced out of a tenured position for merely reminding the world that physical laws about which there is no dissent whatsoever contradict the official theory of the world trade center towers collapse now if nine eleven was a scad then we would understand the full extent to which the destruction of the world trade center occurred under abnormal circumstances and we would thereby be in position to understand why the collapse of building  under normal circumstances would probably have captured the attention of the city and the world did not do so it was not allowed to become well known for reasons mentioned earlier unlike the twin towers it was not hit by a plane because of this there was no jet fuel to spread big fires to many floors and its collapse unlike that of each of the twin towers looked exactly like a classic implosion and which the collapse begins from the bottom and the building folds in upon itself ending up in a tidy pile in its own footprint the fact that building seven was brought down by explosives with therefore much more obvious this greater obviousness is illustrated not only by daniel winkle responses but also by many engineers and scientists who joined the nine eleven truth movement only after seeing a video of this building's collapse for example daniel h engineer in paris wrote in the years after the nine eleven events i thought that all i read in professional reviews and french newspapers was true the first time i understand that it was impossible was when i saw a film about the collapse of world trade center seven civil engineer chester gearhart of kansas city wrote i have watched the construction of many large buildings and also personally witnessed five controlled demolitions in kansas city when i saw the towers fall on nine eleven i knew something was wrong and my first instinct was that it was impossible when i saw a building seven fall i knew it was controlled demolition this video was even deci university of copenhagen chemist niels herit who later became the first author of the nano thermite paper when asked how he became involved with these issues he replied it all started when i saw the collapse of building seven the third skyscraper collapse of an hours after the twin towers and there were only two airplanes when you see a forty seven story building one hundred eighty six meters tall collapsed in six and a half seconds and you are a scientist you think a lot i had to watch it again and again i hit the button ten times my jaw dropped lower and lower firstly i had never heard of that building before and there was no visible reason why it should collapse in such a way straight down in six and a half seconds i have had no rest since that day given these reactions it is obvious why if nine eleven was a state crime against democracy the fact of building seven is collapse and especially the video of this collapse had to be suppressed as much as possible having made this point i need to respond to an obvious objection is those who were responsible for bringing down building seven were going to need to suppress the video of its collapse why did they wait until late in the day when the air was clean and cameras would be focused on this building to bring it down so that we have these perfectly clear videos from many angles of the building coming down in freefall why did the not bring it down in the morning shortly after one of the towers had collapsed when the air was filled with dust so photos and videos were impossible for example they could have brought it down at ten forty five which would have been about seventeen minutes after the collapse of the north tower and the air was still so dense with dust and smoke that all the cameraman had to run away and according to nist did not start returning until eleven o'clock why didn't they bring it down then well as i've reported in an appendix to the mysterious collapse of world trade center seven it looks like that's what they meant to do i won't give the evidence here but it appears that building seven was one researcher put it a dud the explosion started going off and at some point they quit and the building as he put it defiantly stood there as a result agents had to be sent into the building this is speculative that's why it's in the appendix so that the cover story could be that fires had brought the building down this hypothesis would explain why although the fires in building seven allegedly were started at ten twenty eight when the north tower collapsed and sent flaming debris all that distance  fires did not start to become visible until afternoon nist itself and it's that in any case had the demolition system work intended this building's collapse would still have been a big mystery but there would have been no video showing that it had come straight down and for over two sockets an absolute free fall and you would have never heard of david chandler i am to size this likelihood the destruction of world trade center seven was a botched operation because if true it provides the clearest possible illustration of the theme of this lecture namely that scads can be hidden in plain sight there are literally dozens of contradictions in the official account of nine eleven that show it to have been an inside job but the clearest proof of this is provided by the video of this enormous building coming straight down in absolute freefall and yet even though this proof has existed in plain sight for all these years the fact that nine eleven was an inside job and hence a state crime against democracy has remained a hidden fact at least in the sense that it is not part of the public conversation how has this hiding  achieved peter dale scott discussing the erosion of the constitution and laws of the open or public state by the american deep state suggest that this erosion has been in civi in part through a series of important indeed the events in post world war two american history events aspects of which will be ignored or suppressed in the mainstream media indeed scott ad mainstream us media having come become so implicated in past protective lies that they as well as the government have now a demonstrated interest in preventing the truth of any of these events from coming out this means that the current threat to constitutional rights does not derive from the deep state alone the problem is a global dominance mines that prevails not only inside the washington beltway but also in the mainstream media one which has come to accept recent inroads to constitutional liberties and stigmatizes or at least responds with silence to those who are alarmed by them acceptance of this mindset notion of decorum has increasingly become a condition for participating in mainstream public life referring thereby to events such as the j f k assassination hoax and nine eleven scott by deep events means the same types of events called scads by the authors of the symposium in american behavioral scientist indeed one of these authors explicitly cites scott's writings trading his deep state events as examples of scads and quoting his statements about the complicity of the mainstream media in covering up the truth of these events these authors also make the same point themselves remarking that the us government account of nine eleven is parroted by the mainstream media and commenting upon the profound profound disavowal of still burning molten questions originating at nine eleven ground zero gone begging by the american media besides parroting the government's account of nine eleven and stigmatizing those who provide alternative accounts with a discrediting label conspiracy theorist how has america's mainstream media kept the truth about world trade center seven hidden from the majority of the american people and the world through various means first by never replaying the statement by dan rather and other reporters about how the collapse of world trade center seven looked exactly like a controlled demolition second i seldom if ever replaying the video of this building's collapse third i never mentioning crittur credible critiques of the official account for example my book the mysterious collapse of world trade center seven subtitled why the final official report about nine eleven is unscientific and faults which has been endorsed by pred stage of scientists and engineers has never been reviewed in the mainstream media or even mentioned even though my previous nine eleven book the new pearl harbor revisited was a publisher's weekly pick of the week in november two thousand and eight fourth by never mentioning except for one story in the washington times that evidently slipped through the existence of an organization called architects and engineers for nine eleven truth which now has twelve hundred licensed members calling for a new investigation i e a real investigation of world trade center seven as well as the twin towers fifth by never reporting scientific evidence contradicting the official account of the building of this this building such as the reported discovery of nano thermite and the dust sixt by overlooking the fact that nist report on world trade center seven omitted an enormous amount of evidence showing that explosives must have been used for example after calling that piece of swiss cheese steel recovered from building seven the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation the new york times did not issue a peep when nist two thousand and eight report did not mention this mysterious piece of steel and even denied that any steel from this building had been recovered not a peep seventh by reporting nist august press conference announcing the draft for public comment and which sender announced with great votto that the mystery of world trade center seven had been solved and that science is really behind what we have said but then not reporting on the final report and the fact that nist in it almost explicitly admitted that science does not stand behind its theory of this buildings collapse through these and related means that american deep state and its controlled media have hidden the truth about the collapse of building seven even though it has existed in plain sight for all these years they have even to a great extent hidden the fact of the collapse itself so that in two thousand and six over forty percent of american people still did not know that it had occurred and in two thousand and nine a judge in new york city upon hearing its name could reply building what oliver this lecture as a case study in the power of the deep state and its controlled media to hide things that exist in plain sight because if they can hide the straight down freefall collapse of the forty seven story building captured on video in broad daylight they can hide anything i say this however not to instill despair but to point to the seriousness of the problem we face and also to pave the way for making a proposal in the spirit of peter dale scott's important essay nine eleven deep state violence and the  hope of internet politics recognizing the high correlation between those who are aware of the collapse of building seven and those who believe a new that is a real investigation is needed i propose that we initiate and this was suggested by the new york city can lawyers a building what campaign and i in particular propose that we initiate it with all hopefully all the nine eleven groups in america and around the world participating that we initiated this september with the goal of making as many people on the planet as possible aware of the collapse of world trade center seven by the tenth anniversary of nine eleven  us ensure that this building is never again known as building plot thank you very much