gallagher my client lost on the accident causation claim it meant burden on those issues that are found then the claimant did not meet his burden on the issue a permanent part of this ability case gets reviewed up in front of the commission and they unanimously affirmed the decision of arbitrary gallagher specifically on a permanent part of this ability issue even the employee representative agreed but the substantial deference that is given to the commission's finding and permanent parts of this ability so we take issue with the commission's finding first of all it's order on its face his not c he was back working full duty i know bamber fifteen to twenty ten not only full duty but there was a lot of testimony on the issue of accident causation about what his job consisted the in the record  the claimant testifies at length about how repetitive his job is how and hence his job is physical labor issues and tools he's open to these proper training or so there's evidence that this is the this is a demanding job and at the time of trial he'd been working in that capacity for over a year i think was a year and four months so he had ample time to test his hands and he was able to work that job in a full duty capacity and then you know reading the brief when i asked you know how are you doing you know you've been working in this fumigator position the same position before the surgeries how are you doing now his testimony months after a surgery for the last time in november twenty second of two thousand and ten document dal indicated he still had a little bit numb this in some of his fingers maybe some sensitivity to the scar tissue but he was he was recovering well enough he was back working noted maybe some sensitivity to the scar tissue and then he noted that this was resolving nicely on its own and to continue to massage it and then when this case proceeded arbitration in april two thousand cohen on what was going on this man's hands we've got to remember that he had bilateral are on the release so he's got scars he's got scar tissue he's got a way of this this this he have scar start to issue and you've got some miss sizing that's going to be taken care of you've got teller pain the doctor b i am he referred to that isn't in no where in the in the record was not there any evidence in thing in the decision about what the doctors were sane what they know when they saw what they were talking about what he was going through and what he would continue to have and he continues to have a deep scar he physical exam the recommendations what they found all doctors his five are completely different than the arbitrator's because our didn't have a i'm not one nothing about what the doctors found in their examination just the systems of scars to have an award and he did well not necessarily because you've got something entirely different on your hand you've got you've got scar tissue that doctors and their reports  automatically means not by scars but the but the doctor's doctors knows that said pill or pain and the scars leading to the pillar paint the pillar of pain is led to and there was nothing in the record that's why the circuit judge in my opinion changed the course of the decision by saying they did not consider they the arbitrator in the commission did not consider the or i don't think it's important based upon the fact that the doctors are referring to the pain that he was having during their last their examinations during the last examination of the treating physician and also the  the i mean it was six months after serving five think i think you have to take it it's the whole the whole record in this case and the whole record is additions testimony plus the medical findings of the doctors not just my doctor  him once a few months after surgery for the last time claimants complaints continued to improve by the time you saw dr cohen in fact dr cohen documents a complete resolution of the carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms and then dr cohen notes that the scar sensitivity continues to improve by the time we get to arbitration a year later he in princes  just like dr cohen expected you know this will completely resolve it's an urban dream and it did begin based on the manifest weight of the evidence i think there's more than sufficient evidence to support the unanimous commission's