when named machine get shipped from germany get it to metal forming and metal forming sends it on to cape cod coppered who puts the question is it is who fills out the address that would say this is going to resit use it at all or who are to part it's going to cape cod copper and second locate it ad i intend to avail myself of the benefits of the jurisdiction by establishing a relationship whatever it ends up even though i don't know what state that's going to be just or i agree with that particularly would you consider the regular flow their answer is a sort of back door a way into the answer to the other question in massachusetts customers did in fact contact shack town and years old or thereabouts of the action occurred one would assume that in that interim period that something must have broken and something must have at the been replaced and yet you have made no allegation that  manufacturers selling forty five heavy duty industrial machines in massachusetts to the tune of one point five million dollars asking the end of the user to call them if there's any need for spare parts and then claiming that the constitution protects them from exclusive distributors the whole point of the stream of commerce doctoring and the fact that regular course of sales are sufficient to establish jurisdiction it's a you can't have a manufacturer is turning a blind eye to where their products are go mississippi was the fourth largest producer there was good reason to think they would have known they were selling to mississippi but in response to just stall when he asked how big a portion of this was massachusetts it's one percent that's true unlike that first circuit case where they court ended up saying they didn't know where one of the customers were we have a case in which there's if you don't know where cape cod it is there's nothing in the record that suggests that anything went to massachusetts and yet you still want to win so how on the press it can you win because on because under the castro under this court's ruling in clips or the regular slow growth products here is if it's not a direct solicitation of business directly to a massachusetts customer and what is it it's not that call me if you want to buy something from me but if someone takes their hand off in your machine please don't call me that's what the why is that matter though because the way it was just put to us as with it you are communicating to people in north america individual persons or purchase the product your troubleshooting manual says if it is not possible to correct the malfunction with the aid of the following tables provided  and secondly why would we and her from the sale of pirates in the absence of specific knowledge about where the inquiries w and i understand that district court didn't reach the other two grounds but if it was wrong on purpose and then we have to face an issue about whether we should simply address the ther manual for me had to think say have the machine and then they have the instructions you know whose mental form means decision to send the instructions that are wrong with the machine and that had nothing to do should examine me for being responsible for the first reports in new york just because i happened to choose a national newspaper it would be kind of crazy to think that i could only come at risk if i choose the local newspaper i got to do the local newspaper in all justice kennedy if it's going to be targeted you know all those things but i have one point you raise which i want to make sure i understand because i think it goes to how significant this case might be consciously choose to do national advertising i have consciously reached out to all those people in all those places when i consciously choose to include the instruction manual with the distributor i have made no conscious choice about where any of it should go any you're helped a little bit by the name of the end user being cape cod which most people understand in geographic terms but suppose it happened in that suppose it was just the metal