or by accident in just regard if you know things for example the bank disregarded the fact that it was already in litigation with the owner of the  they put all this information inside and what they said is well we'll just we'll just substitute service somehow we're going to disregard everything we know we're going to supplant that with ignorance and we're going to try to substitute s and what the court did there is said while they may file this form with the secretary of state motion to not i come into the picture to reconsider i think that there was more than jurisdiction because it didn't have notice of suits the courtship shifted the burden of his losses that to the bank and the bank had to provide a power affidavit or something sworn to this said no we we did everything properly here's how we get it he never did that the judge didn't ask for he didn't provide it in the judge still found a fare from the bank and i think that's unfair it's a technical error but it's important in this case because he didn't one of the cornerstones of our system is notice of suits if this court allows that trial finding in order to stand it that's against them i think us and us was in titles a notice of suits i think they were entitled to process and be involved in the process the bank shouldn't be rewarded for imputed ignorance meaning disregarding everything he knew about where to find access to the corporation serving him at his house but just because we had him mr personally it was just easier to serve him for the corporation there we don't know what the registration office is for the corporation that's never been identified in the normal course of business  anybody has a registered agent isn't this is a person and so it turns out that we've learned that he was conducting business at a completely different address not just home but a business that he runs in to pitch company after the fact we don't know that that's where he's conducting his business that's a commercial property that he has that's where he knew his rental income coming in and out of there and so that's where he's conducting business not out of his house but not of the actors in the pitch count so i mean the part of the problem is this is just spread throughout the counties were and will are a new page of of service and it wasn't as if we're taking a deficiency judgment against them that that wasn't the ultimate goal in this case so the goal is to finish the foreclosure and you know proceed when we need more holding that service proper beer business corporation report so there you have it you got another attempt at was just look at one document and disregard everything that we know let's look at the mortgage look at the interest on the mortgage let's not looking at the invoice as we sent to mr genteel at this house and  you office let's not look at the research our receiver the banks receiver when to first office building when the city was commands they got to serve their own receiver which would have gotten notice to mr genteel this is a look at those things just look at the mortgage now let's just look at that one thing just disregard this do the robo ignorance thing where we just won't pay attention anything else but about the waiver of jurors who do waiver of jurisdiction it is a flawed argument and here's why there is nothing that was presented in the lower court by you was simply yes they did anything other than tast service now was the title of the motion a motion of wash no for the bank is to give them leverage and they'd be found if you put yourself in a dark room and this is how we think about this case is that how do we take this house and not give mr gentil notice and you actually planned it that way this is how you would do it but it but it fails to do inquire into inquiry analysis fails on its face and why does it fell on his face because they had all the information where to find him in the worst office was