dismissing his illinois wage payment and collection now i'm going to use i don't you see if it court found that those cases were all reversed by the ca amended in two thousand and one and one of those cases and for those he stands for your honor there's there's a lot of in all jurisdiction or in all cases you can get a double republic for the same claim and that is actually my point in regards to section fourteen which the that the trial work reference and relied upon his wagers he did not receive full payment and he didn't here have his day in court he believes that the amount that he received was insufficient further he believes he's owed interest and penalties and cost and attorney  ask whether or not it was it was double a double recovery production and that is exactly what section fourteen yes i believe the reading of that section fourteen says the employed not hate see ca which reads nothing here again shall be construed to prevent any employee for making the plane or prosecuting his or her own plane for wa saying no more all the language and all of the communications and all the filings from the department labor indicate that mr cross had every right to go anywhere in social work that he want to  appears to be what the legislature has created and the fact that someone has a choice and well that's my third point but the fact that someone has a choice to go to either civil court or go to the department of labor does not guarantee and that's what that section in the house of reps actually refers to section six but let me give you an example let's take a mythical national company called mall that has national highway hiring and national and those acts include section sets it can deal with other states to make sure that wage disputes across state lines don't create a barrier to recovery for an employee who's been wronged by his employer his or her employer such as this is a very powerful to joe i think that goes into the purpose of the amendments that came through in two thousand and seven and not two thousand and fourteen the if no matter what the parties decide to do in front of a court if the court has no jurisdiction we can't give the courts was diction by going to complain if that means that it wasn't but it could have been but that i was there for the court hearings i do what if the purpose of this statute is to smooth the way for people to get paid monies they're owed why would they create one system in the effort to to smooth the way and then i would like to start a rebuttal in regards to counsel's last point that the right for a filing of independent action by the employee  thousand and eleven amendments the additional language saying without bar to industry back that's new but the right to sue prior to that did exist  disagree with defense counsel on that and miller reiki and and and walters all refer to employee not the department of labor pursuing a claim and all those did predate the two thousand always had things that they could do but nothing that i have found in the the amendments the legislative history or in the language found within the act itself states that the apparent violations and a demand that the worker but a demand and it closes this decision does not preclude any party from seeking any remedy available in equity or law you may wish to consult dollars that was paid he believes that the department of labor gave a gratuitous payment for a payment which he actually heard so he would like a full hearing on all of the claims that he has and of course all of the claims that