court of appeal to this panel should there were reverse the denial of the encounter i see what the question is i would prefer to look at the question slightly differently because and the case was amended particularly pointed out that i was publishing the final rules that were opposed in you have for damages and you have no stake whatsoever in the top us case so please tell us about something that's relevant to this or i'm the reason why i was interested  if i just said you have no interest in patents tell us about this case well this is a first amendment case in which the patent office has prohibited  took you remove yourself from the agent's roles in one thousand nine hundred five but that your honor is very very much in dispute now about now we're getting to the matter before us finally ok but but the point is you removed yourself  practice before the pattern but your question was slightly different the question that i have is why they didn't change my name instead of taking the position that that was a removal of me from the ball i think there's no reason why i or i was under as you may know when you said well now we come to two thousand and five they tell you if you're to be  readmitted you must take the bar and you agree with that you take the required no sir i don't i mean why did you take the test three cars because of c e i am required in new york state to show that i am after winning five gold medals just because i simply didn't get a passing grade going on the exam doesn't mean that i'm not qualified or competent or in any other way my injunction is against error or requiring me to take the thing i am not required by any rule or any statute to take the stand i can take it voluntarily wonderful i did just bar because you are a little i understand that they think you a letter that thing we're going to treat your application as a request could be taken right off the world and if you disagree with that interpretation yes there will be hell worth in that you never respond not even close i excuse me but i don't think that's even close i wrote them and told them that my name was changed and they wrote back to me saying that we're going to hold the whole matter in the banks they didn't ask me for any information it was not in our i thought requesting need it tell them why they should take now cornell d m judge hornish write to the commissioner and say is that you have incorrectly issued an order under a name he's abandoned but he is ceasing his practice before the patent office until you and after all or amend the correct order i presume he's but i'm trying to figure out if you made the correct statement just to write back to him and say we're not going to investigate you any further but we're removing you from the rolls yes your honor it's the agenc write to let us know with thirty days because parker we're going to do is also defer continuing to investigate allegations against the office did not hear back from six months later his name scrying yes it is real and there's no didn't claim in this case it's difficult to completely understand what exactly he has alleged a number of his motions that i'm not money damages for a constitutional violation under the authority of the bivins kid your honor i don't believe that it is there he has raised money damages in other motions but as far as the complaint is because i don't believe the current that is in the three jurisdictions where there were investigations and possibly suspension to believe mr cornish earth is in his papers to our quick that he was reinstated and all three of those peers victims would if your understanding of his that is with respect to being reinstated or not being reinstated in new york maryland and the district of columbia i don't i don't know or otherwise show that he was current in his knowledge of p p o patent practice you were completely correct or he was sent a letter and did would provide any documentation under the second alternative  meeting that's correct and he also attended certain seely's and did some other things but there wasn't sufficient evidence fear to show that he actually attended those he was offered the opportunity to supplement that sort he was but he never did it that's correct he decided to take the exam and he took the exam in a number of occasions but was unsuccessful in those types and i think further that the pap office has actually not stated the case correctly and i have been in good standing in all the courts you mentioned including th score and they have cleared by the letter mention that is to say you wrote to us and tell this you changed your name we can consider removing it from the record perfectly satisfactory thing to do so i don't have to resign or i have to worry about being dissed b me to practice there i'm in good standing everywhere including the patent office but i didn't pay extending a patent office they have never said that they have it will not allow me to express my first amendment right in my purse a case to quail myself an attorney in good standing in new york d c and maryland so the injunction is to pr first amendment religious case because i changed my name after the heart surgery and minds hearts stopped for one hour and the only explanation i can find for my had given me it's much much more than i deserve and my name was told i told the patent office i changed it and it was for religious reasons it wasn't as though pointed out that i was resigning to avoid the embarrassment of disbarment i don't care whether they get smarmy as a matter of fact i had repeatedly asked for a hearing i'm asking for one now and i have never gotten it for thirteen this is really an administrative problem that they are having this is not a legal problem and that's up to them to figure out which name they never said which name was removed removed i still don't know which name was