MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
circumstance the legislature one inch look at all of the circumstances not just one everything is relevant in terms of what should be looked at if the child or she changed looking at the true circumstances and it's all these circumstances were not the reason for the change collected the reason for the change but they were the ones so for example you have the been looked at the income the financial situations all children or both parents well when you say look at them all together what do you mean i mean you have to look at each individually i mean how does the parenting time relate to the income of the recipient and the income of your will i mean if there's a change in the circumstances that make it in a little ball there would be a substantial change in circumstances that were good but if there's been no change in circumstances i mean the real sort of the agreement curtain  the extracurricular activities without any embarrassment even though he was in time he had been paying child support the same level without seeking any type of production since the p know that's not necessarily the case but look at what you're spending your money on let's look at your lifestyle let's look at what the child's needs are let's look at all these different things and determine whether or not it's i could close to say that your to a basis for finding a substantial change in circumstances so if this child was a newborn and then he's and then he waited this four years were five years in that then the judge said oh no you waited too long so the theoretically he could not change his child support until  be discussing the factors to consider in determining whether any parent who has retired has suffered a substantial change in circumstances or instead should be expected to reach into retirement hindsight i think tells us that a court has to look at all of these circumstances not just separately but take them off into account when the decision with respect to whether there is of substantial change in circumstances is being made you interpret this language differently after that that's what i'm seeing all i mean there's a lot of people out there who have never settlement agreements the new walking into effect and then they're going to have some substantial change in circumstance maybe a serious health problem if they actually are forced to leave their job it was all part of one line so the fact that he's arguing that i don't think that it should be all sit or that's not new that's always been there and just because the trial  children as i mentioned before the college expenses he paid out contribution the most of these extracurricular activities and medical expenses he did not see any sort of reimbursement and again didn't come back to try to get his each have the same the same buildings same obligation
find when you're ready we can please proceed with argument there's not a single case is you have to have a hearing if you did not work of a section is who's right yet there's not a single case that holds differently than that is that where they impose sanctions and don't give a reason we're having hearing the reverse or not there's not a single case i there is a distinction i think that should be applied
matter in two thousand
yes anyways on today's episode and the next night and the next one three count them we are showing the public domain superman cartoons and they were done in the forty thousand nine hundred forty one to about one thousand nine hundred three by the fletcher studios then owned by paramount and they're in color technicolor who are just they're just beautiful pieces of work and you know back in the forty's there weren't that many color movies but what you are about to see in this episode are three and the first one is the mad scientist and what's interesting about this one is that it has the origin story of superman and that's a little different than the more recent recreate sions of the origin story and there are some similarities if this is more attuned to the comic book in the second the billion dollar heist portrays lois lane in a very powerful role she is not the damned soul in distress although superman does save her at the end as was usual in those days she's nonetheless very powerful takes matters into her own hands and she's actually fighting off the thugs really neat power woman for that time one nine hundred forty two was it was was when that film was made and then the arctic monster the last one which was really kind of interesting because it sort of parallel the cover of a fro a frozen mammoth in the arctic and so there was some and oh this is like a job for superman  so
and he thought he was seizing was he right now who used them yes if he thinks that how can we all still think that this is not a serious medical emergency for which is to start calling the nurses on well what we know isn't that the whole point here is that it's the time that the lapses between when this out here man collapses and when the paramedics finally finally finally get that there were out there was an e mail to harper with respect to the ass from which contradicted gagne so all of those things of the totality of our debt testimony wouldn't that be enough to allow the jurors in in terms of his actions i think you have to focus on what's uncontested because just the shots that you pointed out rightly so that there is some dispute about the timing or some dispute about whether he knew or didn't know about medical care because he sat for the nurse he they performed c p r was it preventing other then why did it made a difference if they called nine one one earlier happens he didn't know that i mean there was their cases had to do with teachers but look at the context it's completely different in the bill in a case it's a slip and fall we're not talking about dealing with an existing health crisis and whether you dealt with it appropriately if you're talking about whether the school to be found  but i think it's absolutely the totality as as you've pointed out before because you can't separate the two it's not just the two minutes it's everything that led up to the two minutes the the facts that are undisputed here are the school had an awareness of the school had emailed that information to the teachers and the teachers were expected to be familiar with it and to act upon it according to joe we were the health care ordinator he would have been aware so either he was and neglected what he six minute estimate the betting very well be inflated because again under the emergency plan mrs give the exact location will win when she got the information she didn't know who was calling to see a didn't identify herself and believed it was a student she didn't know what the situation was
why did you bring just fine we need to make the next ship ho and it's for whatever it's worth i'm trying to quit yet when you just stay over there on your side and i'm going to stay on my own i be that way i guess we'll just sit here and  your so much in common and in until you walked into my
experience with my friend teams and if and now here with you can respond so welcome to the q and bridge before enjoying their first music selection today i will add to bring you a little bit sense of history broken the connection between q on the us that have been very important in the cultural exchange does the reason and the main reason why we are here with you in richmond today we're going to start just one person into a
been there for a couple of days and for whatever reason the holiday weekend soon he said it wasn't he never noticed it that way in telling the person fast so doesn't that take a lot of reasonable inference that something else fall who was watching you know what was happening in that specific gym class what was involved was the actual policy and issue that had been adopted by the school board that we should provide kids with more ways but not provide them out you have to be engaged using that implement you're using the tool in for instance the middle of a demonstration when the accident occurs that's just not a requirement the class the beach structure he's responsible in this case mr brock he's the lab rat he's responsible for overseeing the class who's responsible for overseeing the kids are the students he's responsible for the environment so how something in the walkway that he's in charge of this he's in charge of this environments and he's responsible for moving it out of the way that is there is a supervisory activity everything i would say and your if that was the teacher did a teacher who supervising a classroom sat in a lab say did or didn't do with respect to the teaching toward teaching aid in their classes in status at the time and place of who was injure trips no it was not the class class or starving he was coming in the boiler had been placed in the classroom it was so so so there's lots of equipment in this activity or the supervising supervising an activity or the use of public property so that's that's point it doesn't have to be a demonstration it can be something involving the actual physical property itself so that's that's clear for instance in the osteen the only supreme court case in epstein right the senate when you're dealing with that dealt with the construction activities whether or not there was a responsibility for this is this is probably the most one of the more compelling types of cases that you'll see on this you have you have to go around you have an issue you have an instructor you have you know some disputed that he's l they have forfeited the idea with respect to not having to prove notice that they didn't have the fluid they waived their argument they never they never brought up that argument to you not to judge cleaning they were required intriguing for several days before the fall ago and came back three days later it was still like that mr kronk is the lab rat you out on it is most familiar with the comings and goings within the last who is most familiar with the equipment in the lab and the fact that he says it's not
hi i'm david the brews and on this episode of the creative good we go political and you know creative commons is a great way to preserve histories of it people later on can access historical footage under a creative commons license today we go donald trump following the election the surprise election of donald trump streets ad marched so on today's show we're going to show you that and i have a son who marched and and on his cell phone he took footage as he was walking to the s tate capitol in sacramento so what you're going to see is that walk there and then once they arrived there my daughter got up on the capitol steps and  told the world what she thought of the election of donald trump so there's that so part of the screen you're about to see you'll see the march in sacramento to the state capital with students protesting you'll see marches that happened elsewhere in the united states i mean this happened in every major city so in the name of historical preservation i bring trump enjoy well if you could enjoy i don't know i mean took a great number of people this was horribly terrible but hey it needs to be part of history so anyway however you want to enjoy or not to enjoy you're in for a good ride i'm david the bruise on wednesday evening thousands of people with mexican heritage something i also heard in today's our rally is a chance contra i would without rapists and response to the dyson's of women who have come forward with allegations of sexual assault a today's rally was as strong
the jury returned a verdict against the city based on officer kennedy's efforts to stop the fleeing criminal this morning i was praying that the judgment in around that verdict should be reversed for chimerism it's run because the officers conduct eighth street and that i would submit that is not a service enough connection that's a legal causes in question because it is too disconnected from the accident from the decision that the freeing suspect nude as he drove through the red light on his own without the officers counter testimony to that as as you just mentioned that it would be relieved of jury duty that's in the transcript at fifteen eighty three but instead a few minutes later the court required the jury to return the next day and the next that require them to return to deliberations and
new long hey let me ask you something oh next it means i have a question for you lazy good for nothing son of a you know was still doesn't h what do you do so
the david the brits this is the creative good where we celebrate all things in the creative commons today we continue our series our ten part series on the woman's march which took place january twenty first two thousand and seventeen that what started out as something that was only going to be in washington may be five hundred five thousand women marching to stand up for human rights in the wake of president trumps and i get a ration well but turned out as a small event turned out to be a phenomenal world wife event involving millions of people not just women little babies kids my dad brothers sisters grandparents i think of all kinds of people muslims buddhists baptist catholics you name it they were there any thing is that god thinks it didn't matter everybody coming together even republicans democrats independents marching together for one solitary reason human rights yes today we're going not to a huge place like l a or washington or paris france or even some of the major towns in canada which we have a whole show coming up next in the next episode today we're going to fe santa fe new mexico and watch the march there and the camera rolls right with the march so it's as though you are there and you get to see the people in the signs you get to see their faces their heart felt reason for being there this is amazing this is me like you're in santa fe and he turned on your t v and this is what you would see this is great you're going to enjoy this ride if you poll human right and i know you are this is going to thrill yours soul as you watch people speaking their hearts and marching for what they truly believe yeah let's go
have to give you notice about the time the contract requires and it changed from one contract to be you have to retire and continue to be retired or you can come out of retirement go back to work for another school district and least with regard to the two thousand and seven well i guess their contract was modified they'd participated in the ramifications of the two thousand and seven collective bargaining agreement before they were tire never asserted it before until this litigation came off and for all this time it's conditioned by law they can ignore and they did so by continuing to cover these people given the fact that's really a reason to deny comes from the teacher retirement system early retirement option you have to be less than sixty years old between fifty five and sixty you have to have fewer than thirty five years of service in the teacher retirement system and then you can qualify for this in the early the current option is something the graphs on top of what you would have gotten from the state to make it appear as though you were sixteen years old when you start drawing your annuity that's the purpose of this early retirement plan of the collective bargaining agreement graphs on top of the earth retirement option for those people that have not yet reached the age of sixty five and seem to have anything else that i would want to sen congress of how do you address
yes i'm david the bruce this is the creative good where we celebrate everything in the creative commons in this we are continuing our ten part series on the woman's march january twenty one two thousand and seventeen and in this particular one we're taking a look at what happened in san diego in each episode we take a look at a different region or we take a look at a different part like for example we had one just on the music of the of the woman's march in another when we had the speeches of some of the major speakers that spoke in the previous one we interviewed people on the street in all kinds of towns well today we're going to take a look at just one particular town and the camera is just going to roll continually as you observe the march in san diego san diego california now they had huge marches in california had a huge one in l a they had a huge one in sacramento and in various other towns but in san diego this is really interesting and what we're going to do the camera is going to run and it's as though you were like a spectator watching this whole thing happen even more than that and so you are a marcher yourself you're going to see the people in the signs this is really good and to do this knowing that there are people in germany and england and france and all over the united states and in canada even in mexico marching you're part of an amazing phenomenal worldwide and that even though you but i don't know
that hit the twenty two least fifty six places directly across the street from the twenty five didn't you dress pretty much just based on so as a practical manner what is the village to authority to complete story told improvements and recapture portion of those costs from property across the street that benefit from those public improvements and  agreement is in fact an agreement it's between a developer and municipality and the case was clear that if they if a developer oversized public improvements or extends public improvements they can recapture the costs pursuant to a lien that they repor against the benefit or property in this case the village stepped into the shoes of the defaulted people developer and decided to do so this certain public improvements itself to benefit the property where the developer it defaulted required benefited property upon subdivision to pay the recapture costs pursuant to a lien that was actually they didn't have a lien there they just had an ordinance that said that if it properties up on sunday vision have to pay recapture costs when the village has installed the public damage to his property if that is claim is a claim for damage to property so in that case the courts are clear that the initial to property case is governed by the fight your catch all statute of limitations all the fees under protest as a condition to them file would be lost because they were challenging the fee as applied and in this case if he's making a general constitutional argument that this or whether or not this is right thank you very much
eight there are three photographs there that show bad rate area and i don't know if there are other pictures but there are things all over that there are there looks like there's an animal in a cage after the surgery was over and chief was discovered very shortly after that he was alive but he was described by more than one observer as in dire found that there was a specific intent not necessarily to kill because it doesn't seek to kill this to to separate death or serious injury now to the answer to your question but more completely by saying what evidence was there let's go back to the very point that you brought out the conditions of that counter that are in states that er was sterile you have to say she completely cleaned that off and made sterile environment and then and then you have to overlook the fact that there's th looks to be like a bloody pizza cutter but all the stuff that is on that island where she did that karen have to say that she cleaned it all did the surgery and put all that condition before but it wasn't until his daughter had these terrible symptoms that require you to go to this emergency clinic in missouri twice in two weeks leading up to the to be a surgery is in ordinary cases where we charge murder with intent to kill or great bodily harm we can look at the circumstances around the intent factor
wrote a one paragraph opinion and ask him to think again and if you came up with the same sentence you'd have to explain it and then we have something to review why is this one paragraph w as much as the squire is not bound by an erroneous concession to the extent that was around yes we felt it was a comment upon us to raise this additional argument on appeal that we became aware of while researching this issue in the course of the greeting we say you better provide some explanation to do that and the higher you go the greater the theory and the more you have to explain it our decision  circumstances he might want to think again before he imposed exactly the same sentence understanding that the st says you was floored by the edge by the scarecrow violation and that he might well be able to here was markets and this court's decision and united states versus rodriguez in two thousand and ten at this court noted that people district courts are awareness of a potential expressed act of concerns and it's awareness of the difference in the guidelines range a young boy over the course of months if not longer and he rather brazenly and repeated the axis child pornography on his united states postal service computer those factors take this piece out of the mind run of cases that are captured cost i think the sentencing transcript makes clear every reopening of this case is a reopening of that for the victims and to cry obviously the defendant's constitutional rights to take priority over those concerns i too want to sort of in the district court's mind when to impose this drastic sentence and i don't know importantly that in the latter scenario in mind sarah montero this court of knowledge even in the context of stating that the burden of explanation grows with the  i just like to respond extremely briefly firstly the government's argument as to the extent to which this was pointed out to the judge to roe as why it should be harmless seems to be backwards to me it's the government has to be asking for erode a standard of