hearing or an application feel free to talk i'd encourage you to say something if you want to become an interested party is that's the fight for my statute that will be necessary if you ever want to appeal any decisions  make if said that up the first hearing on the agenda is would lend l l c and kevin kennedy application twelve dash twenty nine for subdivision amendment associated with the greystone subdivision to adjust the probably a half dozen recorded surveys of gray stone in the land records and the current deeds for both of these refer to the two thousand and five also also shown on the so what this adjustment is is based on is what of the town of richmond would consider to be the boundaries based on the you know the tax maps the deeds in the record survey it's an adjustment from that boundar bound to read the whole line with you know you can see some some propose markers set along that boundary was was drafted between the two parties in order to to accommodate these drainage systems that they put in it meets the meets the setback requirements and everything is as it should be in doing that we kind of going full circle here because of our application really came in during the interim at the proposal the rights were coming through so we went through the whole process of getting our application ready for that and since that didn't pass we're we're back here so shown on the map that show the the old version and the new version and the expansion of those on lot eight it's simply a really accommodating it's a it's a and that none of the previous approvals said that the owners have to come back to the dear be all whenever there's a bounty bidder valerie just for greystone they've all come that chris has provided an additional drawing that shows the distance from the center line of gray stone to the front of the setback for the building  heard yeah ok the majority of this parcel was for which there's an existing house in old farm opposite the active fire complex we are trying to configure ops for and we know by elevation that that's not correct and that we could and will file for a better map of men to correct the elevation while they should in this area right here is about it's real and and this is more that the remaining land has wood is mostly flood plain but there is an additional ten thousand square feet of that of the for the plane so we wouldn't be creating a lot of second that had the same problem yes and no and the flood line doesn't that is a lawyer there it's by elevation and it does cross at this location but the wind in this area  doesn't take into account the rice i mean if from off the road right here the field is probably eight feet war and a flood plain doesn't rise into the field but produce something they basically say well we're right until you show us where rock and that's what the letter map amendment is for that we're confident that we could obtain just point out that there there isn't any additional line of blue line yes and that's those that line represents the version of the boundary that richmond has presented to fema as part of our peel the fema has not acted on it yet so as might said they could proceed with getting the letter met change under the current with the current math and be able to go ahead with this project they don't have to wait for the new the new human that to be approved gathering and i don't know what i'm gathering my property for and here it is ok ak so now you have a house right next door to me that's somewhat ok you're going to build a house becoming me so now all my privacy in house is going to go right down the tubes and i'm trying to sell so by my property you won't have to do any of  house because now i'm living next door to you know multiple houses where it was a single family dwelling house farm house the australian star so you know i see your isn't our intent to create something there that would be i think i want to be really careful with the front house because i want my mother's house to be well protected i want her of keeping that house but that's just the current thought and continuing to read maybe i'm reading it maybe it has no up stairs for five six years but i have took to a point i guess you could work both ways we could sell you are about you know the person like us by your i don't believe that we would do something as a matter of trees there even if they were up on the second floor which i know they can use the second floor they are working down to our backyard and for out there someday they're doing whatever we're doing i don't want some we'll we need to somehow be able to have a different family member in the house and although it says it's capable of supporting land development so i guess if it is a capable of it's not in a building a second country three i mean is there really even enough there to get you to ten thousand square feet looking at thousand square feet  yeah well you know i mean there's it you know to be fair to you i would i would venture that there is some risk borne and you take him out a lot as a standalone with a variance recognizing in some decisions somewhere that it's in a flood and then we prepare elevation certificate on the guy then you can go further and create a letter map amendment where you can actually convince fema that that the it's really not being utilized at all somebody would like to utilize it and we're brainstorming ways to do that  renovated both yeah it's pretty cool that it's there and that's what i do out in the news is two it's two cars and actually there isn't enough even if they have company to park behind them the building is a structure having the roof so if it has to be one building does the roof have to cover the whole building and then you cannot connect the being asked to do this project and you know i like my husband that's not happening  within a residential is so long as the number of units proposed for the anti or residential community does not exceed the number which could have been approved for the subdivision of the lot without a residential p d s this is that this is the scenario ran into with justin duplex is fine but the so the that with this this would have to to me this would have to come in as a residential for a multi family dwelling of three or more units for lots served by municipal water and sewer systems two thirds of an acre per land her dwelling unit shot there not more my my gut my inclination is telling me if you came to do this as a residential ph d you could do it or not have to connect them at all don't think she can have three dwelling units on that lot that's that's as i read through the the regs suggest to me that you can have three dwelling units on a lot that size and i density resident in h e r where in the case of the use of a law for a multifamily dwelling of three or more units vary so even if you connect them now it is a multifamily dwelling right of three or more unit dimensional limitations may be permitted subject to the conditions set forth in the section