it is fully participating and she will have the opportunity to hear both sides but to participate with questions although there is a slight delay so if you hear me pause and waiting for a question from and there are many layers wrote that to me in two thousand and twelve and thirteen he also said that any additional value that i'd like to give you zero or a million dollars in that it was my instead mr simpson by the court with the retainer which i'm actually very glad that he did because in that retainer agreement was the arbitration clause if this but you know this simpson i am a former district judge and as a district judge it was not my function to order the arbitration the arbitration agreement it's up to one of the parties having agreed that you will arbitrated still up to one of the parties to say i want to go to arbitration and the significance of the agreement to the district judge is and at the request of the parties for arbitration whether that will be granted or not but in my experience is a district judge it has never been the function of the district judge himself or herself to order the arbitration hearing you on that last question thank you for letting me know what i would thing was my understanding from reviewing the record was that mr simpson simply represented he would providing you a copy of the while mr simpson had written in his email that i had received an e mail copy from him according to that and go to school and try to file in rules that was not accurate what i had consented  that they receive electronic notices through the clerk of the work not from former counsel and what i'm just saying that even mr simpson did not say i am providing this to you for the  so no one actually requested arbitration is that correct that's correct your honor instead of mr simpson contacting valerie you know once he found out there was a three hundred fifty thousand dollars settlement did not contact me whe court in the district court ok and when was this motion relieved to file out of time presented to me if i can just check your honor it may have  brief and perhaps in a separate mature can you keep your voice a please i'm having trouble trouble hearing you on this valerie you indicated in response to some questions that you raise the issue of arbitration in filing cabinet the district court rule my question for you first is you knew in january that ensure that arbitration occurred why didn't you seek to request that that issue be taken from the court and he put in arbitration as soon as you knew that there was going to be a dispute about the well your honor i had been addressing it in the position to his motion and supporting a memorandum however it was stricken from the record which brings us to the point it was stricken from the record by someone other than  simpson and i thought the contract for corners of it would be followed and i didn't know that obvious obviously sounds of ok i just didn't like mr simpson takes  receives a parent the permission to file it through the court through an e mail but i have not received the reason for the motion was very difficult to i had not received the electronically filed reasons for the motion so i did not know that my clock was ticking on the deadline we we know so from the record that an e mail copy of the brief was by all we know from your opposition feel that you were aware of this contest but let me bring it to my next question in your opposition to the motion one of your reasons for off hosing it is you wanted to put in the public domain your to be inconsistent with someone who wants arbitrary because you want a public hearing on your issue confidential right they would learn that would learn that in my vision because mr simpson but your opposition in the arbitration the public would know about be yeah and that would not be by going to the court that would be by going to an arbitration board saying i want arbitration and then if the other side objected you go to the court and say well look we've got  going to settle the case or a low figure settlement and i was trying to make it possible for her side will never learn whether what happened with that settlement discussion or heard nothing more wrote an e mail to me stating that he signed three hundred twenty five thousand dollar rule sixty eight on his own volition he signed it that he said he signed and he wasn't going to be available the next day valerie you know myself had to go make a decision and settle the case without my attorney and i needed to know from him if forty thousand dollars was enough for him because he signed the three hundred twenty five thousand dollars settlement that to me that exhibit i referred to will show that so it wasn't that linda just came out of the blue trying to reduce her greenman i had to make a decision without my lawyer the same lawyer refused know mr simpson's dishonesty before this court he stood up here he said that the only reason why he offered the twenty two thousand six five amount was because linda lo reno was settling her case in two thousand thirteen for a hundred thousand dollars when in fact if you go back and check the e mail of records mr simpson wrote in here is what i sent you to well that is before linda vale one more comm