defendant police officers misleading magistrates in arrest warrants the defendant's facts and their arrest warrant were derived from one witness and the defendants knew she was fatally unreliable control interview in november of two thousand and eleven at the child advocacy center that the purpose was a control that provided control generic scene for the witness to be interviewed she was a mentally disabled adult at the defendant detective raymond was the only representative from the police department is a joint issue of fact on how that is the interview and it does have defendant raymond affairs deposition th he was told to arrest and to call on as a result of that interview prosecutor blanchard who the defendants perceived as their boss as a prosecutor and disputes that in a deposition and testified that he told defendant raymond he needed to obtain c l's complete records and he disputes that he told the defendants to arrest andrew cohen after that the next major concert of that investigation was an interview that detective raymond performed in december of two thousand and eleven he did that outside the control of the process he did that without contacting the prosecutor blanchard and he did so to inquire gun at the initial control interview the defendant's claim that cd did mention it and it appears in the detective raymond's narrative proport and run deposition prosecutor blanchard in the rocking him county attorney's office testified assault evaluation that was performed by the c l they knew that had happened but they didn't obtain that were they could have looked for other extrinsic ways to proof the case it's important to protect people but it's also important to protect the fourth amendment right and so time they got by it but there were very obvious critical steps that they were supposed to take even at the direction of prosecutor plan check and they didn't do those things and instead a month after they control that interview i got it appears on the record her and you say this stories are inherently inconsistent and we don't read the record downplay all right thank you  arranging of serving the child advocacy center interview the steps included attempting to interview members of the cohen household which they refused to deal with steps also included executing the search warrant for the small back on that was office called a meeting with the police department at that meeting our deputy county attorney tom reed who was prosecutor plain turd's supervisor instructed the fremont police department to arrest plain t her inability to properly describe it was this sexual evaluation  and that's an explanation for why they did not directly ask or for it because they understood it would only be turned over to his agency on the county attorney's office as the agent of the attorney general in mary alice which is still good law holds that the sheriff and local police have a duty to act according to the county attorney's notion of law enforcement the undisputed  show that on december sixteenth two thousand and eleven the final decision to arrest cullen was made by the rockingham county attorney's office not chief because the county attorney's office is the final authority on call ins ar children into statement adults are easy targets for sexual abusers because they are not typical witnesses qualified immunity it exists to protect our officers like sergeant raymond and chief sharon from being sued for money damages when they acted assault evaluation was and it was a rape case that was intended to protect a member of society and that given the concerns of prosecutor pleasure to communicate it to the defendants they had an obligation to