but they just didn't do what our wires do just how as a mere i was the elected official in lake county to apply for the wiretap and we can see why we don't want states attorneys regardless of how high up they are coming into and there is no exception there's no good faith except back in the statute itself it's the civically exams the good faith exceptions you generally the more requirements so obviously our legislature was concerned about i mean we think about what happened here this is hours of hundreds of hours of recorded phone conversations of citizens we're talking about everything from maybe birthday parties we really want to narrow this we want to make sure that we're not doing phishing x but its mission is in listening to people's phone calls and it's not necessary and this is not an emergency cases not one of those cases where you know if this was an issue right now in this moment they would have lost you know all evidence they had two months the issue two different wiretap authorizations neither dollars case and then this case but i think that you know judge strickland assuming the facts as they as he would would not licensed attorney makes representations that as in your own did not personally of this it was not just the expert witness was it wasn't there testimony from one of the cool spears th friends they can make a reasonable inference even if you think you know which you know let's be honest a lot of people who do drugs and use drugs and sell drugs are members of you know i get a street gang but that doesn't mean that my client's intense was in the gang and did with the gang so it's not just and you know i have when i got my reply brief that the legislature really wanted to make sure that we just didn't say oh you're in a gang we're going to escalate you or your punishment here we want to make sure that you're doing it to further the necessarily this case where if this court finds that the calculated criminal drug conspiracy and street gang you know that the punishment is relatively the same but you know there might be implications for other as far as this affecting anyone but michael i don't think so and again here these were you know i can't stress the importance of these there are twenty means essential confessions and i climb on the phone talking about this connecting in corroborat again but not with these white house you would agree that would not the state offer pretty compelling evidence that the defendant your client and all were involved in the conspiracy so yeah i don't make any any claim that th don't we use traditional concepts of accountability constructive possession that we use in every other type of couple case why is drug transactions a always this is a question why do we treat drug trafficking any had enough time to kind of hear a what was going on with this conspiracy and you know you know it's you understand the layers in and they did you know because they got the wiretap warrants and they were able to kind of figure out who and let me ask you this rules of professional conduct three point three candor toward the tribunals wasn't the state obligated to the schools the trial court to do what it was not signed by the state's attorney as well as simple strong motion doesn't the state have discovery materials tendered to them by the state the state has an obligation to correct the record if there's a misrepresentation correct where in time where you are asking residents representation that if documents are not fond of us but the state had an obligation to present the application did not this was when the judge was ruling and said yes he will they made their arguments and the court  we call that because i read it was school everybody who took of a procedure should be aware that for a while your tips in the state of illinois if you want the law school here have to be signed by the state's attorney or by stay til the eliot case was objected to it was a twenty six dollars team the state's attorney of lake county was doing whatever i don't know what was going on in the other one hundred and one counties in this state but this five years of the statutes pretty clear yet maybe true but if it was being accepted and wasn't being cham do we know that well you don't know when and he gets exactly right and you know how responsibility of any defense attorney to investigate the circumstances leading to her his or her client's arrest regardless of how guilty the defendant might be it's an ethical obligation of every defense attorney to investigate the circumstances surrounding the defendant's arrest and all you have to do is open your criminal code and read article want to we'd be i don't contest so what are you talking about then about prevailing professional norms the responsibility of every defense lawyer is to investigate the circumstances of his or her client's arrest and the facts and circumstances here of the state the weight of the evidence which you  don't personally well maybe the fact is that in all the other counties the state's attorney is complying with one would be or they just simply do not use what would be used in their particular defense attorney is not in the way it has been done in this court i know you have granted the motion to supplement which i still disagree with and i will disagree with the for another reason that that the there was explaining anything about those documents so there was no explanation as to why things were crossed out it's not a record or who crossed it challenging i you challeng integrity of the defense counsel the filed the motion for new trial of attaching what was given to the defense by the psni not attacking anybody's integrity i'm raising a question how did all the black outs who wrote all the notes all over was it the judge was it the person who submitted it what i'm say well i just went when you asked me before if i have a copy of  supplement with something that we have that has blackouts and with no accreditation to who do you know what when i said information the state right the state knows when i see the state where there might have been the exceptions appended to where you are at attorney licensed to practice law in the state of illinois yes state team you could pick up the phone and call the state's attorney himself and yes are these documents themselves part of the record on appeal i can pick up the phone and i often do call but i do get information but i can't submit it here because it's not part of the record on appeal that's just a conversation between myself you can continuously cite to the conversations record i do cite him and the defense was put if only what was given to them by the state in the motion for new trial correct and sorry like the not i'm sorry they supplement the record with what was given to them by the state i don't know that you times up thank