MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
right it's you're saying it becomes at some point i mean if the legislature makes decisions about how to protect the public that's part of their police power and if they've made the decision that in this changing world our world has changed we have internet now we didn't used to in ninet these are visuals do not want to make sure they do not want to be found and so they're not going to just show their information sometimes we can get through a search maybe a telephone subscriber you know it we try to use whatever it is that we have exactly the same version change here a bill really said we don't need to reach the constitutional question because even if it passes punitive portions it is still consistent with the goal of the statute itself me very very with respect to the first issue just to dispel there is no such thing as just a section three violation the state is now attempting to basically try the defendant on appeal by saying well since it's a section three evacuation we can then you know if there's any evidence for any sense section in section three then the way you know you're guilty of the offense that's just not true that would be nice saying that under they you get the statute right any
specific motor vehicles including one with my seat and was operating it doesn't take any creative notice to look at that policy previous cases where we've had the issue of stacking the same kind of thing as a reason a i agree this is a different kind of reform but you know claims that just because of the premiums shown to have been line and this language is in the very least confusing and when you look at it i think it's reasonable to argue that this in assonance is no that which should be held against in your own home with regard to the other issues that are raised was if there is other similar insurance here is if there is power of political insurance also it thinking in this it will meal case kind of different illnesses but you're also in the general here also we have these changes in condition section which includes the other insurance language which to me anyway and it looks basically
did you hear me and hear me good you know what day this is today tuesday says tuesday what happened two years ago the day i want to two years ago and maybe say i help you sir yes i'd like something nice for a lady something special she's got the kind of shape the world should be and that's about right i'll take it differently do you have a card over there sir thank you u have another one all right but you know what this stuff does to me but i trust you sleep in the kitchen down below under the stove the reasonable it's after three i sleep up here best will terrier my child cried all night to find her please return reward hollywood nine six eight five the no no no i'm going to bring him to you myself then i can tell my wife it all ran away or something and get her another one and see it so that is it will be no question about a reward want a policeman say what is this a pearl where else would i be if not in my office where all cindy then what could i get you there six times i phone between two and five thirty are you and i look here stay right there i'll get back to whole i know what she knows change knows everything she's my mother in law yeah i've had a couple myself towers i don't get it p man murdered that yes question and you all are involved mother naturally murders somebody every day but you're supposed to be so it's after two so maybe you've been a little delayed why don't you just go back to bed now i'm going to be spoken to like fed by my own daughter in my own house wondering about i didn't want to wake up i didn't have a generation for others don't suppose i would've won the belt for sure yes i know thank you  i don't you say so he's got a cold darling darling  why shouldn't he in his own house
there are one hundred billion fixed stars air astronomical observatories actually irregular way that might have been sent from outer space opinion those electric waves in my opinion much different than the ones we are now getting they came from beyond our galaxy these impulses much nearer could these be humans do you suppose now living on this planet  covers it entirely not reasonable to us centered on the same also no air the conclusion no advantage vertebrates exist it's not so what is the meaning of the waves would you say well let's your mother would to provide as you must admit to but you see the reason we watch the stars of the night is that of course i know the reason you want to discover new stars is invented that you don't want to name a story after him and you come  can't you tell us your identity other people here we control the laws of nature here through our site you're quite superior because i looked in my telescope every single night you see i was searching for a planet like this i know in some way there should be you are right ours was truly an advanced society we got to the point where we could control the laws of nature by advanced electronics but then a mixed up computer you make the final check on the ship you know that strange hello my dear i just came from my son had a nice well never be able to get to it please wait what is it bit you know the rules are planted those that uses have to go it's the only solution cut it out it's not right to tease you know got a friend told children yes yes
air astronomical observatory's can we irregular way that might have been sent from outer space opinion those electric waves in my opinion much different than the ones we are now getting they came from beyond our galaxy these impulses much nearer could these be humans do you suppose now living on this planet it's too mars right there there are no rivers at all it added and no venus has a temperature several hundred degree centigrade we come now to jupiter frozen covers it entirely not reducible to us cent turn the same also no air the conclusion no advantage vertebrates exist it's not so what is the meaning of the waves would you say your mother would to provide for you must admit to but you see the reason we watch the stars of the night is that of course i know the reason you want to discover new stars isn't it that you don't want to name a star after him and this can you tell me which receives and can you tell us a star we are on we called him and the star is exactly like the earth and has the same atmosphere our star is situated we control the laws of nature here through our site you're quite superior because i looked in my telescope every single night you see i was searching for a planet like this i know in some way there should be you are right ours was truly an advanced society we got to the point with control of the laws of nature by advanced electronics but then a mixed up computer we attempted to send out some signals thinking someone would hear there was no answer you see those with a way to put it by a doctor she got to see those who were still alive got on a this is the not it's just about the control and you read here until we can repair the shi regime you make a final check on the ship and let your mind imagine what it looks  you know that strange gobble their brains from their brains all the knowledge that has been handed down is stored now in their complicated brains and so if we eat their brains that knowledge will help us to adapt we can accomplish could they have even the pretty worried about it but i certainly give tom a good licking all right that is when he finally gets back and so very sorry it's not your  well never be able to get to it please wait what it's a last resort but i don't get it out it's not right to tease you know governor as a friend told children yes yes right it's all right my glasses keep slipping when i get excited
that's enough to pay off policy but you have no right to collect on the policy that you actually purchased and if you had an
that she was at a sedentary level while the arbitrator took it to be the end all be all with or with their limitations the s c specifically stated were conditioning to get her back to her old job so she i mean three years later dr carlson  yes she can return to her job full duty this woman had a year and a half a year gap between two thousand so in two thousand and eleven a treaty for that me and the if you choose treaty for leading up to the time of trial was quite insufficiency and that's it and they are sure found that they reduced her wages i believe to eight or nine dollars an hour from fifteen and it was clear to the commission the arbitrary at the time of the trial they raise these back up to fifteen dollars an hour in a clear attempt to avoid a wage differential so you can look at some of the say aha it will be there were going to earning the same twenty three dollars an hour she gets then you get the way to approach one hundred pay when she still employed there you just say keep working until we fire you then this way for us was going to kick in i mean that's what she was making at the time of the trial it was a bona fide job and kept her the there for this would have already been through oral arguments at that point and this is over a year later it is well at the point that he wants to reopen the proofs again i mean it's a very slippery slope a lot to do and come back and say well we didn't get this i want to come back and try to get  increase in this case that that's not the case and you have four years or four years of employment with with no issues with this employee in terms of physical or of reprimands the grievances any of them for years of these wages and through
years prior to the money your oil from it's not any prior to the to the bottom  what do you consider the standard of review in this case he agree that it's a manifest way to the evidence or do you think it's a different standard
or this is a case brought under the whistle blowing traction it presents on appeal a very narrow issue relating to the subject of jurisdiction first let me say that i  the administrative judge in his initial decision should be given some deference under these spatial stater cites the fulton case i would respectfully disagree with that assessment because it's important to understand
oh was from kentucky the compiler and publisher and composer of many songs in the book called the kentucky harmony and this particular song was also contemporarily contemporaneous well contemporarily i guess we were to be found in the charlie there's a lot of different traveling singing camps in summer and usually two or three of them overseas into the summer and some of the countries there we've gone to a lot of bulgaria south africa georgia and so we're going to do quite a number of course in songs in this program we'll stick with and secular starting with a movement from the traditional mass it used to be that a new town or village and course a good of any size would have its own particular version of singing  mass every sunday in church and would be sung by a confraternity of singers four or five singers who would learn of this music passed down from generation to generation or so this is  the oh oh oh oh oh whoa whoa oh um
one of the panel members today rather than three and we have some unforeseen circumstances however the other two justices have been assigned the case and they have read briefs in they will
right there with the blue dog i'm not sure whether i did or not they were certainly deposed with respect to the prior art no no i didn't because we didn't know the documents at the
feat for sure this is a test for processing i told everybody involved in the inverse reveals a five thousand dollar expense for registering happy feet to the court clerk at the birth center certified
to the starter that's case number four one one zero one four seven and that is consolidated with four one one zero one four eight  real estate purchase contract between the plaintiff mr clarke and if mr steiner and if there was such a contract what the appropriate remedy would be the circuit court found there to be won a contract between clark have been an oral contract between mr clarke and mr shiner despite the fact that there was no writing and that the only evidence of such a contract was the word of mr clarke himself the record will show that you nothing for two three months meaning he didn't advise the individual i paid taxes he didn't bring a deed to mr snyder and say hey i paid the taxes like we talked about made improvements on the property or it up or something of that nature did you know he went to the property the neighbor extent of any improvements of something that would have been factually disputed because the way we have stipulated we proceed there was really no evidence as of yet as actions of kirkman and steiner where they actually go to the courthouse together where they actually go to the clerk's office to pay the taxes where they actually have the discussion about who's going to do the deed and tender and it's our position that that is not a forceful contract it's in violation of the statute of frauds and there is no writing which would memorialize the brief nothing which provides a description of the property in terms of  bremer because it's violet if the statute crofts and once you make that finding then that's the case or other factor which we would ask the court to review is the still the ruling the trial court simply said land is presumed unique and i found no authority in the state of illinois which entitles to a party of a presumption now there is a general concept that land is case and i don't believe that the record would support a find this because it simply is a lie and with that finding then the court would say what legal remedy would mr clarke and that's where we get the be remanded for terminations of legal damn legal risk i did not mean you can gather this from the letter when a court to foreclose on the plaintiff or presented subsequent evidence if the court found the in forceful contract so i think one of two things would happen as a result of this current appeal your article your first of our rights and dismissed the case or if your honor to find there to be enforceable contract and you will have the rebuttal thank you in regards to the issue of  think that that's the case
i wish i had an opportunity offer this opinion and the court also took notice object romanies ruling the court does not did not credit the defendant's testimony and did not present the maoris and did not credit scrapped and the state is not arguing that it was correct not to inform the trial counsel or own the judge that's that's not the issue here and you know the defendant was a very you know pleasant one pretty fellow and up until this morning the state was going to say there really wouldn't have been a reason to make him wear a stand belt other than the so the issue is how it was you know cancel he also could not ask the court to do something about the sundown issue because he was ignorant of the court on its own had no reason to take any any that the defendant did not testify merely because of the stand none of those issues were were proof so there was no there was no proof of th constitutional right to love and that's why the court was correct in finding that there were in denying the standard issue although the court did use the term way and weighed in the sense cross examination and was told to be quiet and he would manage so it didn't seem like there was any if any it doesn't seem the jury noticed it because it was small and it was under his shirt in and he mentions nothing about the stand if it had been it had been a problem he knew it here and he mentions nothing about the court was correct in not crediting the defendant's self serving testimony at the upper denture hearing when everything else all of his other actions during the trial that were preserved and all this other statements during trial that were recorded there's nothing about being inhibited personally by  nothing he made no complaint so apparently he was not truly bob the complaint come well three four months later he had three to four months between the trial and the sentencing hearing to talk to his counsel about it he also did not raise any thing about that in this in this motion for a new trial he was had three to four months to talk counsel about it and did not complain and when at the sentencing hearing at the motion you know when he was arguing as his reasons for wanting a continuance you have wide latitude to address the judge and he  constitutional right and he failed to meet that burden in the field do it with credible evidence and the court was correct to deny this after an eviden
one of the other things that mr curtis is that he did not receive adequate training and i went into a great deal of detail in a group of one on one part of there that i think is very important like to point out there was a review board its first review board he did pass so they allowed a second car to go through trick and it was the second trading fail that they decided that you can see that he didn't cheat it about metal air traffic controller that it was in and out of our program that he failed it and that they even consider trying to find a job again and came to the conclusion that the skill said it was lacking
did but the question is whether or not beat is related to a b and c and whether or not it's a b k are related to construction this is one of the music it's not a question of whether it is sure isn't because the which is cook and the language of boston cook the language is a procedure for caring and boss eight the language is general discussion a class around it materials in their production in both of those
october i do not get it through view until last week so i have cases good sites that would say it is discretionary for the trial judge involves they the physical crime a crime of violence if you will where as your other two were a matter of trust or inability consent so that one would probably be the one that would should survive  answer going back to the initial argument one regarding the comments by the thinking you're fudging a little bit don't you think he did say that the father was upset but he also went on to talk about the fact that he thought that the prosecutor was the andriy and that she would not have that person who would have said anything not only was he saying apparently straightforward that because i believe in the prosecutor i it's additional reason to find this probable but it also raises i that the specter that is respect for this prosecutor may have permeated other parts of the trial so you know to me it's it to make it seem as if the defendant that fathers testimony was in trial really depended upon the credibility of the prosecutor we don't believe that's the case  the situation where the witness is fighting information that was important to the case in the judge's m
you know  looking at a one seventy five in the court's order and it says that e some some nefarious additional reason that she had to to prosecute have her prosecuted and the court cites law and then not when when talking about the probable cause that's the first racial question i believe this record breaker and establishes that the second thing here is that there is a question of the wall which the court determines as to whether or not probable cause exists based on those facts and you indicated in response to questions by counsel that debbie wassermann was given the opportunity to send a complaint and based on her signature on their complaint that was a packet making the arrest correct however independent of they have certain complaint you is all of the facts put together with her signature correct question so you have essentially corroborating information to support the decision to offer her the opportunity to second place answer absolutely
thought whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa really
seems the words of the world wrong is that they never consider technical feasibility or economic reasonableness which they are required by the statute to do they are required to consider those factors when they adopt a rule and section twenty the section on adjusted standards incorporating section twenty seven which is the section of the act hearing with the adoption of rules and so section twenty week also requires the board to consider technical feasibility in economic reasonableness when  what your point source but we're also and so you're saying that to get that adjusted standard as a point source you have requirements that were put up on record that had to be partners we think that those are are pretty standard things that the board does all the time are well within the board's power but this asset condition is something that you have let's explain that offset in ordinary times what it basically what they basically what they condition about employee compensation they think is far beyond their power in establishing thank you opsec condition i'm somewhat and only you know i realize that that's it's a very unique condition and the rationale for imposing knight condition basin forty five percent of what i am just hard wrought ok how do you do that how do i know whether i got by forty five hundred acres or or and that would be one possibility of gaining well i mean would it be unreasonable to say that it is feasible at the outset because they're asking emerald to measure what the government has seen the already but now ate a program that's designed to do this at least make some effort and one thing that was going on was so basically you can hire a fiction writer make a report well to get a coke or roasted chicken and your picture on the on the company magazine don't intend to discuss it further but those are set forth in the brief and we think that that's another condition that should be reversed i think dress several of the things that were raised during mr schmitz argument he sa compensation is not consistent with the heir the axis nothing about the board having authority to do that a condition it doesn't seem to condition but as to the conditions for renewal just in standards is not without any discussion about further south that could they impose this and this i mean they're talking about conditions trying to reduce the overall negative oxygen ratio in the base i think the answer is possibly the thing i would point out is that in this record there is no discussion of the dissolved oxygen problem in the illinois river in fact the illinois river is
and those reservations made clear that the student is included is it has been included from ninety ninety six already dead then the per capita strew the cost for educating students in both schools operated by the spring district in the charter school will be school districts are different and there's a very it were supposed to give deference to tuesday interpretation as opposed to the