i want to bring to your attention is the ale chase failure to evaluate the if side effects of mr williams medications properly the a l j upon a report by mr williams that he was not having any side effects from a batch of hypertension medications in two thousand  medications in two thousand and fourteen j ignored mr williams testimony that he was drowsy as a result of his mental health then there's there were the nonexistent records cited by the l j to discredit mr williams on the basis of his activities  even if we live leave aside the failure to cite the records properly of the citation of not existing records the simple meals problem here is his exertional difficulties right the record is uncontroverted that he gets winded because of his c o p d and other elements after ten feet of walking and if he can't exert himself even to that extent how can he do this degree of even light work and that was insufficiently considered it seems to me the side effects issue is in the case certainly but that a stronger issue is this exertion of difficulty exactly and the it all charity ignored with respect to the preparation of simple meals william used paper plate williams used paper plates and disposable utensils so when he would have to exert himself even less and his driving was limited to about two blocks now just because he could keep himself clean and throw lifting twenty pounds occasionally and being on his feet for six hours of face when did mr williams become homeless then once rather late in the game i think it was two thousand and thirteen or two thousand and fourteen but with the record will correct me if i'm wrong and where i think living at present i'm sure what he lives in shelters he calls my office every day every couple of months to see how things are going one more thing that was ignored by the a l j in the evaluation of mr williams as activities of daily living here stay at his store he mentioned that his daughter did the house cleaning so will use those at the time when he when he did have a house william so we've simply was not capable of like work the then between the last for a few by the state agency physicians and the they hear a fair amount of pheasants came in about williams's ass my high blood pressure neuropathy coronary artery disease and  related activities and that's just that they all chase should have consulted a doctor to see what the what the limitations caused by this new evidence would feel because not being your doctor as the could no reasonable trier of fact find differently well of course a reasonable trier of fact i could find differently who evaluated the activities of daily living correctly or and this case should go back any further questions doesn't look like thank you thank you eldest finding mr williams has an unlimited ability to walk ever be reconciled with this record even if the a l j might have graduated his allegation that it becomes we know good after walking ten yards how could anyone possibly characterize his ability to walk as a limit l yes you're out and they o j did find that mr williams was limited to light work which according to the ruling would include up to six hours of walking and standing per day although he did state within the hour of c that mr williams was otherwise unlimited and walking and standing and that's actually more restrictive than the only specific medical opinions in the record which are from the state agency doctors who both found that he could actually perform up to heavy or even very or even moderate but i don't think that any doctor or characterize his medical history as normal poor mainly normal i mean there's evidence his hypertension and his neuropathy his depression his anxiety they  capacity significantly from what those doctors said i think it's also significant that all of these impairments were present while before mr williams i'm seventy and this is a stop for a case meaning the l g found that he could do work that he did in the past which he did do with those impairments and the ale jase found based on the medical records that there really was an evidence of worsening over time and that really isn't contested in this case so mr williams did perform  those he called it a gym teacher it was classified by the vocational expert as a recreation aide and the landscaper job at the light level he performed both of those with his appearance prior to his onset date and that was one of the major themes of the elegies decision as to you know just bite these impairments he was able to work in the past i'm sore he's using inhalers twice a day he's taking medication for is blood pressure he's had a stroke he said that the medication causes this drowsiness for which he naps two or three times for twenty or sixty minutes can you imagine someone on a playground who is snapping correct that the l g statement was too specific specifically mentioned listener crowell when mr williams testify just generally that his blood pressure pills made him drowsy but the general point still stands that he never reported that drowsiness to his doctors from any of the blood pressure medications during the relevant time period and this court has found an l g can properly consider whether or not an l g has reported symptoms to his and i'm sorry side effects to his doctors and mr williams did not do that in this case  i wanted to go if there are no further questions on this point i wanted to go in to the activities of daily living that were raised earlier in this report presentation and you know in particular this is only one aspect of the of symptom analysis the l g did consider mr williams statements regarding his activities but did not a cli from a full time work and specifically said that they didn't support disabling limitations but didn't add never equated them with work and didn't over emphasize them with regard to your honor's point about the wounded with exertion you know mr williams testified that he could only walk ten yards which is a very significant limitation and the l g did specifically address that such a limitation and in fact there is no medical opinion in the record that specifically says that mr williams is more limited than light work there is dr krishna sami's opinion who's the cardiologist to just that he's learned with shortness of breath  what there are ten yards or something else it's just it's an exertion all difficulty right and the only two opinions are just not specific so they say with exertion they don't say with how much there's no specific truly that lack support any way you look at it again i think my interpretation of that was that she failed she was limiting him to no more than six hours but i do appreciate the point but again the only specific medical team with regard to his action a limitation was heavy to very heavy exertion and the l g a found that that wasn't warranted given the medical evidence but you know given a pulmonary function testing and the cardiac testing in the records the l eight hours straight and that kind of logic has been rejected by this court over and over again look at childress vs colt and at record and said the testimony or the i'm sorry his recorded activities didn't support his allegations that he could only walk ten yards and can only lead three to five pounds with his right arm and again that was only one aspect of this subjective symptom analysis and this case you know something else here the bit about with his smoking mr o'keefe he is a past smoker and even if he was still smoking that would not be a reason to discredit him without evidence of how the vote acts and of course that's the children's case but anyway  that's correct that the record the l j cited didn't he was technically correct when he said it indicated mr williams rejected smoking cessation information and had a fifty six year history of smoking but the bulk of the records if you drill down clearly show that he had quit smoking some years prior so that was a stay but given the other act reason the l g gave you know that wasn't something overly emphasize i think that would be hard counsel your after after the last review so that would have been in two thousand and thirteen or two thousand