detail that report maybe is a violation up according to the human rights commission it's a violation because those answers prepare arrest records when making arrests and therefore it's the exact same thing as an arrest the human literally hanging out of the ceiling was a bag full of drugs containing a belief very for small bags individually packaged you know the kind you'd expect her to see for distribution and very nice anything whatsoever about whether listed in that report the only individual that was seen was the individual was noted in that record exiting the bar with one of those small bags of drugs matching what was found in the site some  brought the officers in there they already knew as they explain the report that meet with them to tell the rest everybody that no no that would certainly not be the circumstances but under these circumstances a reasonable person a reasonable ceiling and the idea that this area was unaware of drugs a plain view in their conclusion that if you just walk into a room and all of a sudden a police officer comes this is you know i don't know and i don't know the people in here but i see was charged with a immigration violation but that did not go anyway as she was she was there was a suicide anted this church based a lot about lack of probable cause completely indefensible on the back of presented to the circuit court when the circuit with her testimony was presented to the circuit court and the probable cause hearing the circuit court was informed that the drugs were not really found in the bar stashed away in some obscure corner the office literally criminal sense in context this is and this is an issue of first impression of this court what constitutes a fact of the rest and given for substance to that narrow definition first is the second clause of section two one of the three which makes clear that any other information indicating the conduct can be considered and information in a real rest report is undoubtedly such other information there is nothing of that stature or language that says information understanding in criminal law in general and every other context think of it particularly in particularly relevant and title seven racial discrimination cases is information sufficient that could give a reasonable person a belief in doing evaluating credibility when they don't get to the after retained counsel we have to hire a private investigator how does a really good do much more than review the information before them and to set the set these reports aside years old because nothing in the statute prohibits it and the statute is an exception to the general you as as the employment provisions of both state and federal law are exceptions to basic principles and b for i have nothing further on that on that point except to just to note that as this court's questions and have read this court with this seems to be looking at the substance of the arrest left that door open maybe some arrests were to be insufficient but that's a different question that's real confirms in her argument here that she intends this court to impose a per se rule and that's just unsupportable by the stature language and because of that era because of the era determining that the that a person should be imposed the circuit court should be reversed again this is a motion for summary judgment for all facts and conclusions from those facts are drawn in favor of the city and the city gets the benefit of the doubt when there's any sort of ambiguity and sort of doubt regarding those facts applying that standard here this courtship very minimum reverse or remand this matter for a new trial for a jury  when she was arrested the rest of court specifically says illegal activity on premises and cites the relevant commission of a chicago media school code it's called cooperation ordinance again that's that's a inside a reasonable person could certainly conclude that that bag approached any of the ceiling that really would observe someone in just if that was his drugs you speculate that that was his drugs even she would have seen and known about him taking responded i want everything that i requested and unable to say that the circuit court allowed and did not allow them to find some troubling points that we felt were most responsive to that point but we don't know we don't know if the circuit court allowed those tr hours or did they give a very general description and we that's why we believe that it's best for this court to remain and for just an explanation not a modification of the word but just for an explanation of what happened so we can