fourteen year old counsel let me tell you what's on my mind in this case so you can educate me if i'm mistaken my thought was you're relying on a horribly that says  evidence that somebody is a pedophile isn't probable cause to search everything in his house for dirty pictures of children but in this case what you have is something a little different it's evidence that a person was looking at images of that naked children on his computer life rather than transmitted and i'm thinking that that is what is distinguishable and would be evidence that he likes to look at those kind of pictures on his computer so he probably has some there one of my misunderstanding well credence to the fourteen year old of course we don't know if the fourteen year old was how much of the facts he knew from his cousin previously that may have allowed him to  location is not supported by the statement from the fourteen year old basic logic one o one when they talk in terms of conclusions or must be something in the primacy that follows to the conclusion in this is a little different it's sam just because the man looks at the boy taking a shower in the bathroom doesn't mean that the man would have child pornography on the computer and i'm  thinking he just didn't look at images honest computer of the naked boy well though he had a child pornography on his computer at that moment why not think you'd have more well the  a camera in the bathroom to prevent burglaries per security purposes that's security in a bathroom i mean it's not where you keep your guns and cameras well but it's an easy access to people either bathroom windows open purchase certainly go through bathroom window entrances and obviously we the building from the end but what about what about the evidence that the boy walked in there and there's a picture of himself on the computer screen n screen what's interesting about that is the absence or the location of the defendant at the time there's no indication that the bennett was in the room if you will the friend there's no indication that the friend it was even in the house at the time and it's also consistent with security purposes what about this hearsay which i guess can be considered in a search warrant affidavit that when his cousin stayed there with his friend the cousin looked at the television and saw a live shot of his friend getting out of the shower yes i have it works to me like an image on the computer of a naked security act on it i've been thinking about a tense he said they think the idea of somebody coming in through the second story didn't cameras for security yes so the lack of the my view the lack of a logical connection between the conclusion and the premises is actually i think what the weber case is talking about policeman says oh i know all about pedophiles well i'm actually you're all right i respect that because i agree with you as nothing to this but i think that's what struck me is the policeman is just saying common sense people like to look at  people who are sexually aroused by children and who are male are going to want to sexually arousing pictures of children yet seem like common sense and in this particular case just see i thought there was probable cause before i got to the policeman's claim of expertise i thought there was probable cause because he told the boy only use the up series bathroom every one of the five times he did the man said i want to check my email he told them to be sure to use the squeegie and then when the boy says he used to squeegee the man says i know you did and when the boy goes into the computer room he sees a little window with a live shot of the bathroom on the computer screen and the boy discovers a motion detector in the path room and the cousin told him that when he had been there he could see a wife out of the bathroom on a television ad i know you're saying the television is different but gosh you can get a gadget to run your computer picture onto the t v screen it's not very hard well the statement of facts to me clearly  fourteen year old male gave a description of having used the bathroom and having seen the images of the bathroom on the computer can't tell so i've been racking my brains trying to think of some security interest in the bathroom and i after this he has motion detectors that have camera that's how i read it too but what that meant to me was oh the man also uses closed circuit security cameras for it would fit in with security reason but i think another way to view it is that even juvenile