MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
i love you know you love me for i don't know chair you're the only girl i've dated in two months we get along fine you do it on the do i think i have to think y day oh i've been in love several times before i got so i could recognize the symptoms several times and each time i thought i found my prince charming most people fall in love quite a few times in their lives well then how can you tell when you really where all the time to think about that let's say the of the trouble with you is you don't seem to understand what love is really about you young punks go to the movies a couple of times do a little necking and you think you're in love i've never seen anything like it i don't want to do it's i don't know bob that's right you don't know maybe you would understand better if i say i've got a nice idea how do you like a double date with gina made tomorrow night why sure bob that would question well suppose we look at these snapshots together snapshots have to do with love oh i was just thinking that they might help you to understand how your capacity for love grows and parents for their care and protection of course some people expect care and protection all their lives they never grow up but it is a kind of don't compare that with picture with my first one i know there was a time when i would look at anyone but my special friend i guess that was a stage of love and boys go through a similar stage when they stick together in gangs and ago you never knew how much i loved you i guess you never knew i existed in the well we all go through crashes like that on teachers on board stars or movies then after a while the know completely forgot remember how important themes of the time and it really was important as a part of learning how to love then i think i can tell puppy oh look there's a couple who met a camp last summer i certainly yes and that's another stage where the physical side of love dominate sometimes this is mistaken for mature women but there is a d to have that kind of love that's a good idea here and if you want sure you can always ask yourself are we really interested in the same do we learned to appreciate classic me i don't always feel at ease with you so unpredictable i guess i am too we don't really know each other and mom talks about being proud of each other i wonder if i could ever be as proud of jack as gen
don't mess with such security benefits why shouldn't banks as a policy matter b certainly if they're aware that they're receiving direct deposits of social security funds well aware of that when they receive statements are attached to our excerpts which were given a record and if if the court looks at those excerpts they will the court will see that this is not an account that is exclusively devoted to the which provided that both mr gorst team was restricted from withdrawing and world famous and other financial institutions were restricted from allowing withdrawals from various from all account to his name now i don't think we want the banks to be making independent judgments about the validity of a court order in fact this is a temporary restraining orders not to women are an injunction i things out and in what is potentially a contentious divorce proceeding or for that matter in a proceeding where the bank really has no access to the individual facts but the parties clearly have the ability to go back to the court you asked for modification terminations so so mr goldstein should have gone to the supreme court and said judge you just froze my social security money you can't do that i believe so but i guess the question i'm struggling with is whether they x do or should have any independent obligation if if they know that they're holding social security money and they're aware of five for a seven a whether if you knew there is a statute that said you can't obey legal process the legal process of attempted to take over the funds was invalid or you had a question about wh why why aren't you violating the law if the law says this money let's assume for the moment this is just a social security account clearly labeled you know that if there's a factual question about that i saying you can't give that money to the owner of the account you must keep it now the question is why does that violate the section that says that money is not subject to any legal process should have recognized this order as being invalid then the problem is i have issues where is it that imposes a specific duty on the bank to take some affirmative action isn't as though they are depriving mr gore scene of his money mr goldstein got its money he got his money with interest and he would have gotten it sooner perhaps if he had actually taken it up with the court that issued the order he was a party to that particular proceedings i think it's are directly want your honor a and i think yes to question but what we're talking about i still have a problem there though suppose you enter for the money in the stake or it's still sad all the money in fact that frequently happens it happened to me  economically feasible to do that in this case because we're talking about approximately two thousand dollars it would have cost many times that amount of money for the bank to actually enter into the proceedings in mr gore scenes divorce case in order to try and i don't think it's unclear i think it's pretty clear but try and unscramble the the whether or  all right well thank you both thank you meant to go skiing
when the boys arrive the therapist introduces them to one another he does not however suggest project after a period of a climate is a term contact is made among the boys this is the beginning step in breaking down isolation the therapist attempts to make him feel at ease he introduces henry to the other boys but this makes henry even more uncomfortable sensing mirrors the flare up with leaves him and returns to helping one of the boys this is good for henry for each sees the therapist as a helpful positive person the boy who is running his bob the free atmosphere of the group encourages him to act out his hyperactivity and distractibility two of the main problems for which he was referred the therapist now withdraws completely from the activity letting the group take over henry withdraws into isolation aimlessly working and dry paint brush back and for but some forty five minutes henry remains rooted to the spot but gradually he steals more and longer glances with the other boys reflecting his awareness of their presence the technique of leaving materials exposed proves its effectiveness when henry picks up the table tennis ball and pavel henry divide his attention between watching the activities in the room and playing with  the heat from the floodlights was affecting robert and yelled bring on the women and demonstrates his brute force albert the feminine boy arrives late the therapist welcomes him alberta's cautions those seemingly not to fright henry is absent from the scene he has again withdrawn this time he has hidden themself in a large packing case which is out of range of the concealed cameras with the boys ignore the suggestion in this way they express their disobedience and also tell the therapist bed early sessions the therapist the stage for refreshment expected the boys will assume this responsibility later on of first to take seats at the table but at a distance away from their own after fifteen minutes inside the packing case henry now emerges tempted by the refreshment fearfully henry after a while the more resistive youngsters are won over by the food and by the therapist permissive  attitude when it's time to end the session the therapist does not tell the boys to leave instead he is put on his coat is a foreman who just most of the boys soon leave including henry had not spoken a single word during the entire two hours to bob and robert stay on dawdling possibly defying the therapist and again testing lets the boys take their time once more passing the test
paul that we believe raised the level of persecution as defined by the act several incidences that were alleged and generally was not rebutted by the by the government  the judge in this particular case need a ruling there was another issue regarding when your bar and she spoke a lot about the incident but in the record there was no indication that should have been considered and so that was our position and we believe that there was sufficient persecution as required under the act in order to show that there was past persecution and that we believe incidents with the maoists he also conceded that his wife and son were living with his mother in law in the exact same town just outside of katmandu since two thousand without any serious problems that was the immigration judges judges have to make a specific finding that the applicant either has or has not suffered past persecution and as you yourself have by believe conceded that wasn't specifically done under the circumstances don't we need to send  ok that's if that's the an assumption will make it in his favor that's been shifts the burden to the government to show that he can he can internally relocate correct that's correct and at that point time there is and the bird and then ship what we're getting it's not altogether clear from the record what you found in that sphere but i'm not sure that helps you if it's not clear from the record then what are we supposed to do we send it back for that reason if we assume that there was a finding of past persecution on the rebut that there was evidence in the record showing that well that presumption of that because i don't know the case but i don't how to how it can help us because if the burden rests on the government and there's no indication that the agency applied that burden the fact that there's record simply asked us to become the agency which is not our job we can only do with the firm or review what the agency's done and it appears that the agency hasn't applied and there's not no indication that the agency is either properly found the existence of instance that a particular issue if it were removed and i think everybody that around the time of the olympics and beijing are aware that things have changed a little bit in that entire area that's  and decision and i did say that it would be futile it recognize the regulatory framework but that would be futile to send it back because there was enough record evidence recognized by the immigration judge indicating that the individual could relocate or that the which specifically use language affirming certain portions of the i g's decision but the portions mentioned say nothing about the claim under the convention against torture and i confess that on these facts  to put these additional citations and we can make sure the council gets a copy of that too please thank you thank you very much
work i don't know how you do it well you read everything i put out when you feel better thanks for the show and there's something on the map ultimately a better t such a contrast to the way we're living down here no time for anything but  things are happening i wish i could talk about it tonight i had the same feelings i had the night i decided to go this is a young man's war well i've always considered myself a well preserved old man done joking about your job isn't that important yeah sure it's important but there are plenty of the fellows who can do it i guess you're right just what i want to hear so much i know how you feel honey because i feel the same way it was my training the i'm sure you'll understand that whatever i do for you in the baby is more important right now and anything else nor the value of these things can be measured in ordinary ways but must be paid for in dollars and cents
over plans for the weekend when my point is an object files to the earth not because newton passed the law but because the universe is made that way so stealing is wrong not because someone passed a law but because peace and happiness are impossible unless all individual possessions are secure we respect law lives because the law is in harmony with the univers itself but what about gambling houses that run wide open there against the law they exist when some people fail to respect the law and when you find gambling wide open you will find other things open crime corruption government robbery peaceful citizens lives in danger they don't know lack of respect for law that's what you would wri well so we're all a lot better off respecting the law because without respect for law the capillary without respect for our man can't get a story built now wait a minute hall table at home that's where his mother kept loose change he was eight years old is another was a busy woman she wouldn't miss a couple of pennies mother didn't miss the pennies so i began taking more money and it became a habit until that's what usually happens but not long after he was driving with his mother when the posted speed limit was thirty five mph she was doing fifty and she had punished him for breaking the law then suddenly it was made to slow down so the little boy learned from his mother that he must obey the law if there's someone around to enforce it by the time he did high school has lost all respect for the law so you see how disrespectful our can become a habit how the parents example may be followed by the child later he stole the wristwatch and publish order to his cronies other boys he was infecting with his own disrespect for long one of the same boys was with him a couple of years later when he made his biggest most dramatic show flaunting the law years it was his biggest show it was also his last done and i believe it will turn out alright he realizes that this trouble began with two pennies stolen from a collector the money wasn't important to them not to its parents real proof of the rightness of law that's why i decided to become a lawyer to help people understand the law to help promote respect for the kids would you like to help that they will practice respect for the law by knowing the law by obeying the law whether there's a policeman around or not by helping with law enforcement and by encouraging others to respect the law
saying it's ranchers can allocate to the association's recruitment the hiring of their workers under federal law are you saying they can do that now and would not get anyone locally no domestic workers willing to do it at that price so then they go abroad why would they do that when they can get plenty of workers the apparently isn't a problem at that state's minimum wage what what why why suggest that the reason they're doing this because of some conspiracy as opposed to just obvious economic concerns well so and in mexico and i'd like to get them i would have to pay them a premium price but then i can just do that for them for them i have to advertise domestically and if there's anyone in the united states is willing that the regulations somehow give us the community we're arguing that the regulations are contacts that the courts look at that make these allegations of fact less suspicious in addition the wage rate that's being set by the federal government the fact that there doesn't appear to be any reason to raise it is context that suggests that this is not a possible conspiracy it makes sense that if you can get sufficient workers and workers who satisfy your needs at a lower price you don't need to conspire to avoid raising the price so it does it's just as well independent action now if you want to talk about a couple of things apart relates specifically to the ranch first you can't be part of a conspiracy if you don't notice it's here there are no factual allegation that show that the independent rangers actually knew what other rangers were doing and the organization acting on behalf of the organization and performing his duties consistent with the organization's duties the only part of the allegation is that mr rich and as the director didn't enter into an agreement everybody was the minimum wage but if they knew that that was going to be regulations well it could also be that i think that it makes the commitment of their interests even more plausible and that for a few reasons first off you minimize the risk of being held to account for violating regulations if your friends are they looked out at what was happening in order to see what the minimum wage richard b with respect to that the concerted action requirement the agreement requirement a few things to took to point out backdrop for what was happening at that time between these telephone groups because when they'd broken up the monotony and they had their own territory sufficient at least under the first part of the discussion one test so my my one of my of friends on the other side said that that this case might be different if we don't lead that the rangers had gotten together talk to their neighbors
and then go to a separate source of images and conform those images to the it's just us now what was wrong with that is that you can now project standard definition video to an audience and have that simulate an experience a movie over from the first system maybe there's a way we can design a system where we're editing in digital video and there is an automatic transmission edges over some other system that instead of conforming video is actually informing david prior art said is that when you still prepare a preview version of lesser quality by using the information stored in the digital nonlinear editing equipment to generate a s known to supply the head a decision list in the form of a computer software to equipment which will assemble on the videotape from various sources that the body did it just reinforces the point that there is let me just  to the boards analysis you know where the general question of obviousness is whether a person of ordinary scale of the art whether the invention would be obvious to a person of ordinary scale in the art with the knowledge of  the reference so for example the one in this case the one limitation is not literally present in one particular reference is using is picture quality but what the prior art does teach is for me the visual images that have been transferred to standard definition video to a decision list as we as i just discussed for a preview screening so the toughest problems we face when we went out we did comprehensive searches and we found references that covered every element of the claim except for one little thing and it was common practice back mere design choice out of the whole comes consequence was a nice phrase had a nice ring to it but i often wondered whether that was legitimate or not well i have the board fortunately did prior independent development going out and seeing what was commercially available and implementing what is commercially available in an obvious manner that point number one
unconstitutional because they don't give a person right to it jury finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the aggravators are present in the second majority opinion by justice prior to those but they're not mandatory so at the end of the two opinions what i get is that if they were there would be a constitutional violation but they're not so there isn't and the reason they're not is that they're really just guidelines and the judge asked them to correction so at the end of the two opinions what we should do is give it back to the judge and say now they have discretion and it's not mandatory if you want to change your sentence  agreement that we want the case to go back down to judge brown so that she can make a determination on me or transfer the trial that comes up all the time in my jurisdiction and i understand that can be a very serious issue in terms of fairness in some cases in this case i don't remember mask putting in any evidence that he's got a bunch of important fact witnesses didn't pendleton but they can't make it to portland or anything like on security concerns and other matters such as that see my concern is if it doesn't matter putting witnesses on much the security concerns look really significant there it's just not a secure courtroom and it looks like kind of a potentially dicey ca very sympathetic judge to turn your three judge panel i have never talked to my colleagues about it but this keep them there can say so and unfortunately we are bound by this court's precedent in that regard as well  court did not call the guidelines before the guidelines analysis and indicated that the defendant would receive a sense of two years basically without reference to the guidelines and  behavior what is sufficient to convey to the community that this is serious to my judgment twenty four months that is another thirty three months simply is not necessary it's not necessary to jail for him for thirty three months to accomplish the purpose of the statu to me that's a statement that the guidelines don't matter they are advisory to the court at that time and she she she picked a spot where she wanted the defendant to be twenty four months but seems like a long shot this is far as the case is we're concerned they were mandatory a third time just at the point as we believe the the method achieved the method used to achieve that twenty four months sans was an illegal departure as as you were indicating because  comments that she wanted to achieve a sense of twenty four months and got there very briefly since i am going came down i ran a search on that case and came up with over one hundred separate opinions as of june and not a single one of those opinions resulted in finding by this court sentenced should not be reminded and so i don't know if there are any opinions of that sort but i do not believe that we can assume from the record as it stands for this court now the judge brown would have imposed the same
man who lived off the forests are dead their graves are on the crest of the hill but the land remains and the sons of the sons of the men who cleared it still plant the cotton from the same old  need for the sausage and the grease for the gravy often there isn't enough to eat never the right things to eat the green vegetables and milk  years of hunger babies being born without a chance of strong bodies babies are good people proud people and in the spring there is much in the winter there is snow in this room the children learn to read to write and to figure they use the same books that all the other children in the state use the same books as the children use in mining towns in mill towns and great industrial centers some of them are good books but they talk about another kind of war the books do not tell of how to rotate crops and what makes balanced farming i do not name the way lessons can be applied to the mountain people the children learn to call the words and what makes seventeen this is not enough the mountain people live close to the earth in the sky and all the call of every wild bird and where the best herbs grow they know the name of every tree
in finding the person that's covered by the founding element so there's a disconnect between what the defendant does which is the the act of remaining and entering and doing so voluntarily and what the ins does which is actually to locate the person consideration that has become relevant to whether or not that element occurred has been an aggressive is not a case where the defendant was deprived of an elemental instruction and in fact the opinion that all the elements were instructed in that case the only issue was to live on the line of cases that talks about how we can go to the statutory language to decide what the what needs to be in the indictment so it relied i think on a case a line of cases that are specific to the grand jury indictment area the defendant was found sixty six miles north of the international border hunted northbound greyhound when asked for identification at the checkpoint boards of checkpoint he like the officers said well i'm a lawful permanent resident with my documents are not there but in my luggage which my luggage one of them there was never any indication any arguments regarding whether or not he voluntarily entered the united states what this case