the as ed mentioned the site is in the low density conservation residential overlay district and this is the parcel of land right here thirty point four acres existing conditions delineation which found multiple wetlands on the site seven streams we designed the plan to have one impact to a  heads down towards the western side so you can see we've got a pretty significant elevation change from east to west i think we've covered that property is thirty point four acres as i said we're proposing a would have sixty units option eg in the conservation residential overlay dish requirement states that we have to have twenty five percent of our gross sites set aside as permanent open space we're providing eleven point zero eight acres gross area and i put in parent is not point three five and we were at nine point zero two in the preliminary plan so much the third of an acre and that area is calculated from the gross for their streams and in conjunction with that crossing front yard setbacks are twenty feet side yards setbacks seven and a half foot minimum and corner lots are at fifteen feet rear yard setback is twenty feet coverage is thirty percent in our minimum lot with the fifty foot as designed we have a minimum lot with the fifty eight feet to accommodate the the smaller of the two housing types planned for the development stream crossings located on the eastern side of the side the high side the second stream crossing is where the stream comes down toward the western portion of the site and it's at this location there's also an existing stream along thompson bill road and that is going to be a culvert replacement so we'll have a stream crossing here and then the final stream crossing will be at this location at the connection of manner there are two storm water facilities both surface pawns located at the low side of the site which is the western side of the site one storm water facility is located here and the other here we're proposing to minimize the impact to the existing slopes between the high side of the development the low side of the element we also have areas that open  parcels on the on the record plan that's that's been submitted to the township i spoke about the open space measurements the surface pons mention and then on the low side here and then on the opposite side of the gas easement and the cross walks are located in those specific spaces based on the fact that we do not have a sidewalk on one side of the road at the stream crossing so we're using those cross cross walks to get pedestrians from one side of the street across the crossing and then back to the other side of the street  we're also using low speed curves and intersections stop conditions as part of our traffic calming plan be tween the estimated sale price would be between three hundred fifty thousand and five hundred thousand these are six of the building elevations i think in your recommendation planning commission and his description exteriors and we've got one more slide which is the the larger units i'd say two types are two sides units we have a approximately forty foot with unit and then an approximately  or this location sort of got one here one here at the gas line easement and then we've got two additional at the high side of the development one here and then one here  they've requested that we had a water sidewalk for for boss pick up and then there's also an open space parcel in this location that we've designed with a pull off for the cluster box that is being required by th a reason why there's no sidewalk in those here due to the natural resources that are there we've got streams and wetlands we are serpentina this road through wetlands and streams that are existing in this location and it was just a request at the very onset of the project from c e c to the township to allow us to to provide on one side of the road and we did get positive feedback that we be able to do that found that we were to go to d p with those impacts was going to look on favorable and we were able to do a preliminary hydraulic and hydrologic analysis on the streams to determine the actual flood way or the floodplain for those streams and it varies from location to location i think we had twenty six cross sections that we did throughout the site but at that location where the stream comes into the property from from beacon manor our flood plain was less than ten feet so that's than five feet on either side of the  stream bed and we did work with the township to develop multiple concepts that are graded on both sides of the road had a retaining wall on both sides of the road and  you know considering the permit requirements the the most appropriate way to was to go ahead and grade on one side and then install the retaining wall in the other very helpful firstly we have we've we have all of that as part of our permit application to d p we have cross sections that had every crossing that is in line with the stream and perpendicular to the between ninety and one hundred feet watersheds as well they're less than one hundred acre watersheds to all of the streams the stream elevation for the stream and we should consider the fact that the streams incised almost seven feet in that location so the wall itself is you know it's last time this came up concern of the residence was the number of vehicles coming through remember right it was shut down three two and so we understand that this is probably inevitable that we're going to get this right away built in that connection between the juniper plant in our homes the concern still is the number the number of traffic in the amount of cars going to get i think was eight hundred vehicles per day we were at the council meeting as the estimate for the number of vehicles right now we have not and it has been good about trying to preserve what we have in regards to the environment not a capsule the tires still concerned about the number of vehicles brought up at the council meeting about right away that was originally there that is doesn't exist but it does and if you could look at lost since nobody owns this right away could it be obtained by the township and if it was i ask that question you had if that township had not had this management mishap thirty five years ago would be using that was available in other what if what would happen then to this traffic flow through these neighborhoods in the vast majority of those eight hundred cars would go if it's available in from the people i've talked to kind of nation possibly nobody owns it even if there was good will rice that needed to be addressed that's a possibility of resurrecting this right away that was designed thirty five years ago to do just what we're trying to do as what he said it needed a ten car to go that way our concerns are significantly less because instead of us getting them better to take this tr away here that could be utilized in the wetlands can be preserved because you've seen this one right you guys are all looking down the proposed with the wall and as i see this and read this but i did find this versus carly from  two five eight nine hundred seventy eight i'll just get to the conclusion that mere nonuse of a right away by its holder no matter how long can be continued including twenty one years cannot manifest an intention to abandon the right because there is no legal obligation upon the right away owner to use it in order to keep his title to it we don't own the right way but there is precedence and there were several citations here that even if you did use it just because you didn't and didn't abandon it doesn't mean you can't get it in that that right away that had had been not accepted by the township has reverted to the adjacent property owners but mr carroll is correct that the town's you could if you wanted condemned that property but i got it and and i just can't imagine again council taking action with the residential property using its powers of eminent domain to is that what you write when it just won't happen and to pack them further additionally to go to the manor or to go to marvel if it was possible additionally we have an impact of any weapons on the site except for  opinion limited domain does exist the fact that they never got the property because certainly the jayson homeowners can go and say it's twenty one years i want to own this property they've never done  so nobody could touch it get it from imminent domain and when i see easily paul i don't mean easily in the sense that you know it's not an easy process i mean that if they've decided just is because it can be done everyone's a winner with this because instead of two connections there's three connection and the real it you will be happy to say forty five second stree existing right away if we agree on giving up some more property for the right away with the wall plan you look at it would affect us the most because we're the two property owners going to buy property first thing i got to say i certainly wouldn't encourage really be able to see what was going through there and if you looked at the situation right now where the road is resisting road it's partially on our property and it's completely on our neighbor's property so it's not in the initial right of way and the right of way to forty foot right away takes in just about the entire street so we understand that would be probably very difficult to get that ermey to cover that entire stream there so we're willing we talk with the with the is like to see is just being able to work out the details to make the pills facilitate that making that happen everybody's been very reasonable with regard to these discussions and i think the fact of the matter is and this is one of the as we discussed with the property owners when you look at where the what is the existing roadway in the existing right away in people's properties one of the things that's going to i'm going to have to happen is that we're going to record  overseeing player to be able to straights it not only impacts our ability to deliver services to that neighborhood it impacts our ability to timely provide services elsewhere when we were here a month ago we went through i think some pretty thorough detail in the site plan multiple questions from the planning commission and we heard one clear item that needed to be addressed and that was  walkable option was going to be too steep if we could not great on their property so as we understand st benedict's is willing to work with us to permit that rating to occur so that we can have a relatively flat sidewalk that can be  walked over so we have received the comments from both gateway and the township there is nothing in there that's a red flag to us we believe those are technical comments that we can address back to the township other than the fifteenth