an officer pulls up in the usually pull up right behind car and use their loudspeaker to tell them that he's black in the driveway or i will park and he should move along but that didn't occur they were in uniform that their car was in front of the other vehicle which meaning that it would have to go around it nor to pull off and that they were fully armed and the court there found it wasn't as he did down didn't what the what the officers observed answer their question as to what the vehicle was doing there didn't they observe someone exit the hotel they did give it to the car and bullets the bullets for a plane they were legally entitled as any officers approached and asked questions like we you you admit that the facts were that the individual entered the car before the officers arrived which means that the only way the officers could have seen what was inside the home was for the card to remain where was that which would suggest that there was something keeping the car there which may have been the two officers approaching now from either side of the car but i think they would   i have to question that you're saying that a reasonably innocent person would feel unrestrained to drive away as he sees two officers approaching his vehicle who obviously parked right in front of their vehicle for the very  as well which means that he had to suppress the observation of the full heat if the bullet was observed properly if the if the officers were able to observe the bullet and there would be no basis to suppress the bullet but he  concerned with why whatever again he was concerned with the connection between the bullet and possibly something else in the got in the field goal which suggests that his intentions were to determine whether or not that i'm serving the bullet lead the officers to question whether there was something true contraband within the vehicle why should the law require that the officers at that point determine whether or not the bull is in fact legally illegally in the car by the absence of an f y d car requiring the officers to ask for an f whitey car because if the individual had produced enough whitey cart your entire set that as well but i suspect that there isn't any other reason to have such a class by police i'm not aware of anybody that use such a right it's always connected is with contraband and therefore there is a there's a reasonable basis to connect the two but here even if there is so no reasonable person of those circumstances would believe that he was not for the way now this all occurred after observing all fac and a conclusion there to be drawn if they were waiting for somebody to exit the motel and they were waiting for this individual period this individual heavy opportunity to get into the back seat before the officers approached the record is explicitly clear in that rights of the individuals in the car that the officers at that point had to turn around and walk back to their vehicle to walk you know why why should they simply be allowed to continue walking towards the vehicle and complete the objective that out trying to get an end to some extent a point in time they were not they were not real they certainly didn't feel free to leave but to some extent that's the very essence of police citizen contact the police rely on the fact that something citizens are not going to feel free to leave but there's nothing wrong with the citizen feeling not free to leave so long as the police don't impose that feeling i'm done and i'm not sure what the police did here that that was conflicting findings but maybe less than clear findings in the first instance he finds that the bullets are not suppressed of all but the gun yes and then he on a motion to reconsider he says no the bullets are as well but we don't my specific answer to that is so what that it's not illegal here or you're not suggesting that the police at that point should simply observe a bullet and then not see anything the police commissioner let's say is not an obligation but let's say it's just a matter cooperation with the police he knows why the police you know what the police observed you can simply say hey i have enough white you care or first of all you have any have an opportunity to in the weapon in the vehicle and there are three men and the vehicle is that reasonable at that time riots you know if there's a dime anywhere that i asked those three people to get out at eight forty five at night avoid the inconvenience of being arrested by officers or at least carry stopped by officers to hear that notice that he has been employed a guard if it's that if it's not if we don't want to burden the them carte blanche to just do anything and if they're really concerned about their own safety he should approach the car off because they're saying he wasn't in jeopardy until they approached the car and observe what they observe and then they can use what they observed as a