standing in front of his girlfriend's house when he heard some shots fired he didn't see that he didn't know where they came from and he didn't think they were in his own direction there was no testimony and that he had to duck out of the way or seek cover for anything  and there was evidence that there are three shelf pieces spot in the street and most importantly one fire bullet and get this bullet was found in the street various wasn't a street q standing on his porch at the time what the market was in reading there was direct evidence that the defendant done on the fly well i guess there's a difference between something that's planned and something that's been proposed to so perhaps once they got to the area and they saw someone you know just driven away that suggests they were from a rival gang that that sent need to really weigh the evidence for a you know reject one sided story and go for the other i think at this point we are relying on you know the issue of intent and identity so that's where we're at this point and the other thing that i wanted to the driver said i saw his arm and his hand out the window of the new head of the shooting out the window in back of him does the victim need to be aware i need to be shot at and i don't i don't think so what if you shoot somebody in the ba that was saying to him i don't remember the name is one where the defendant aimed at the bar and there was someone standing behind inside the high end of the door and this is well that doesn't count because how is he to know that and he should retrieve the guy when apparently can seriously ever either got a mess and an argos i don't know with the exchange of occurred i don't think he means the phone conversation he exchange of the the gun from the defendant to sirius regardless when they got to to the police they don't see how they get the police don't see how you know defense in this case you seem to thirty year sentence but it wasn't really a thirty year sentence he received a ten year sentence with a twenty year mandatory because he discharged the weapon and he never contest the fact that he discharged the sentences did they get the defendant in this case get a ten year sentence for an attempt first degree murder an article bargained down to a four year sentence that's not such a great discrepancy when you different cases and we don't know what happened in that other case do you find it remarkable that this victim indicated that he's on the front steps in his house in your hair you know we will hear anything in the front of the house saying is that where most of these cases say is he'll be ending or you didn't know how to shoot the gun cooler or who knows what but i think all the circumstances taken together with the testimony and he described it as a fired bullet it wasn't a bullet casing the shell or anything the expert called it a fired bullet and while he was able to identify the shell he sees as having been fired from the gun he wasn't able to s weapon in this case so soon he got and in fact he ended up getting four years we do know that he ended up getting four years on that and with time served she was already don that sentence when he was testifying at the yard was trash and in this case the sentence