handle situations like this and the public is clamoring for some way of stopping these kind of attempts by parents to just ignore the nothing indicating that this was their reporting there's got to be some basis for making them social host and we don't cite any facts that would make them social hopes but what about the allegations on paragraphs  reform negligently they said we're not allowing any kind of alcohol we're not we don't want anybody to ensure we're going to monitor inspect what's goes on here and they did and in fact not only tell the child that he was not to have any alcohol beverages no house they made sure that they were that they told their son that numerous to drink and drive that they were going to insure all of this by monitoring and inspecting to make sure that was the problem that was the case what they did was they opened up all the garage doors that opened up all the doors of the house they turn up all the way so they could see what was going on and they walked around the house mr household went into the basement and filled with alcohol bottles beer bottles he watched these people drinking he knew all of them were under the age of twenty one he knew that when these people were drinking they were going to be driving home was parked in his driveway he watched him drinking he had conversations with them he could tell he will be coming in the created and instead of doing something about it after indicating that he wasn't going to do something about it he did nothing and then that and it we believe that our complaint showed with those facts that he voluntarily undertook the duty to not have any of this kind of behavior conversations with about internet gambling and the like sports he said i do not want you drinking and driving you were not to leave the premises if you're doing drinking any on hold of governors almost blew blinders on knowing that they're drinking and knowing that people are coming in and out of the house watching people carrying boxes filled with liquor boxes filled with litter and beer into the house drinking  rooms inside and outside the house you know he knew what was going on he had conversations with various people including possibly my client but now with the supreme co and the later case of race i extended even voluntary undertaking a cause of action in a situation where there was a party in our hall and the use of a handgun the mother nettie said there's going to be no that's the argument the defense has but that's not what's going on here there is no attempt to circumvent anything and instead it's an application of the cause of action that was sent out by the supreme court in wan blouse they put her head under a pillow under these are the kind of things that they did in and it's setting up their voluntary undertaking in in the in our case no one more than that way more th they knew pouring is going on they they said they didn't want to happen they allowed it to happen they almost indorsed it by their presence there despite the fact that they indicated house this is the place where kids to go to have a free wheeling party drink do drugs whatever they want to do that was how this house was known and that's all set like the rights case not only said you know extent they don't extend it but they show that there are other costs of action that can take place besides it's the exact these kinds of facts and cause of action there has got to be a way to prevent parents from acting like this and the law firm is living and breathing it must expand to these kinds of situations so based on a limited amount just gave i think not however i believe those people will be criminally prosecuted a i believe they should be criminally prosecuted a i've got a couple of high school kids myself and i'm telling  they could've done so but it doesn't mean that by making it have some kind of a penalty on the criminal part of the kit aspect of the statute that bars any kind of civil a kind of a remedy and in fact being indicating that the legislature somehow intended to limit the remedies available under the literature and in fact the facts of this case are almost set out in a little controller social roles but not the responsible question here is is the voluntary undertaking theory of liability predicated about somebody being a social there there's an exception justice when it's where in the closet reaction is in condition of hot and alcohol related situation so i don't see it as necessarily an exception to the to the to the law office says there is no social host liability for alcohol related offenses i see that they have what happened while the rich had nothing to do and and they did not provide again this is such a  nineteen years old eighteen years old clearly the rationale in all of these decisions is you're old enough to vote you're old enough to be personally accountable for your own actions and you are not cases miller culture health case that you say indicates that while the defendant didn't actually serve or provide liquor they were still considered social hosts and therefore exempt from liability but if you read some of these cases clone slowly didn't think really each involved furnishing or providing alcohol in some way with the taking  in charles and other decisions may have said this is very or the law is the responsibility of the legislature and they have spoken time and time same here that died graduate from high school he was eighteen years old if he had been a definitive been the year before he would be covered under that statute and we wouldn't be even here this isn't a where this isn't smoke and mirrors we're talking about real people that need to be held responsible for their actions the defendants in this case knew there was a party going on they said that they want to make sure and monitor inspect and do everything possible based on the history that their son had with the with the parties and the criminal convictions that he had been involved in they were never going to let this happen again host and while each case opens it up to being something other than that they allow for an application on any voluntary undertaking situation the fact of the matter is that on under the under the surface this is here there is another dead boy in the same car he had a different judge judge moment heard the same exact motion for  other two six one file the complaint mirror each other however she found other judges i'm sure have throughout the state that there is a way the plaintiffs can fashion a complaint to reasonably standard cause of action on to the voluntary undertaking of the facts or meet that burden judge but the chips fall seem to think there is a difference in their position that is one being a passenger in the other being a driver bell mindcrime and without mr bell being served alcohol and without getting it wrong and without the voluntary undertaking that the hustles had a nap case there would be the inspecting it and knew how to go on council said that my client you know that he never mr russell never knew that my client was intoxicated mr hoffa was in the basement he was my client was drinking in the basement there that that evidence it's facts it and he knew that there were people drinking he knew there was a tremendous smell about all he talked to these people he could tell that they were intoxicated