action which the police officer's testimony at trial indicates was calculated to get people in the group scattered and they came in to see what actions if any the group would take mr when it comes on the police radar when he's following harper lee knows it's not on the record for it's not a question before the court whether the police would have had reasonable cause to stop and question mr harper is a known gang member we don't know if he was on parole he was accused of anything or anything like that  going to say pope well there's no objective evidence of any attempted hand in hand drug transactions or criminal activity or drinking or anything of that nature it's it is on record that we have this is an innocent  i believe the record reflects that on the first drive by one individual went through the gate and then was tearing back from behind the wall at the officers and second time while i was just the first person went through the very same gate behave suspiciously the second first and last through the gate was a young gang member the third person through the gates mr when as soon as to where he was going i think the totality of the facts would indicate a high degree of suspicion because of the others who preceded him and what they were doing so as to why you went through the gate began to walk away from the officer and as the gate closed he began to run as he fled from officer harris that was officer harrison testimony that was the finding of judge rothstein in her original ruling on the motion to suppress that he fled from the officer so given her her her finding in her order given the testimony of the officer i don't think there's any doubt that for purposes of the constitutional inquiry mr quince led the officers in high crim well you know i know there are there is other there are there is other we of of opinion that's really doesn't matter how quickly an individual flees there is discussion about headlong asked to stop by the police officer he in fact began to run and i prefer the testimony is that he looked back several times at the uniformed police officer as he then exited attempted to exit through that gate which two other individuals had previously the inquiry from from a constitutional standpoint as outlined warlock is pretty clear we do have a high crime area i think it's significant on your prior question your honor that there were a number of individuals present i think that fact indicate i'm i'm i'm simply getting at the earlier question which is and i think fairly to me now it is it more or less suspicious that one person even m  i would suggest that that the record is fears for all of references to facts which are almost directly on point with wardlaw including fact that the arriving officers were in full uniform that the emergency lights were activated on the police a marketable vehicle that a warning was shouted out by individuals present in the in the parking light in terms very clear of those individuals as the officers testified and that it was it was clear the that's the struggle kurth and prior to the time that the evidence was seized which of which was the subject of the suppression motion that any reasonable opportunity to further investigate mr quinn was present from a constitutional standpoint i think that it's it's very clear with this appeal i think it's rather clear that the court takes all of the evidence that is available in the record to determine whether the when there is nothing right