is just accused of a couple of burglaries and somebody calls a career criminal there there was evidence of a commonality between the twenty or twenty different counts some of them repeat there over fifteen separate things taken many of them of the same victims but there are a least a half a dozen victims one in recount that has but you're right there's a series of crimes that are taking place in rural community quantities and you know expensive items are taken and they're finding a lawyer he does but there is the one that brought it up and started talking about professional criminals and all the rest of like honest and used he brought it up in the context of trying to get the officer who's who's trying to be nice he's being an expert in identifying these that make a difference and then after says yeah when i see things like this i think of people who are kind of professional criminals what is that so then that's the test mycenae ask them another question and then the officer does it again and says well you know i see this kind of thing i want i think of because of my experience as i think of these career professional criminals because they they do the sort of issues which deal right but mr evers as a lawyer never thought of how i move to strike that because investigating crimes like this where there's a series and then the people who are involved will deliberately change shoes in order to throw off the forensics there was no testimony that he knows that about mr amber and so there's no connect factual connection and years and the judge then wait a minute we're going to run into problems in the defense specifically objective and so what if we discussed pleading guilty to the misdemeanor identification so we avoid this prejudicial display of all these you know indirectly bringing in argument the very first part portion he deliberately says career criminal but only look don't look at what he did rather than why he did it but i think you i mean he didn't he didn't get to do what he wanted to do but he he did the best he could with the evidence that was in the cage and if it was part of the story well i don't there was no there was no factual evidence that mr amber says is a point it's a very narrow it's a very specific quote i realize that but there is no evidence presented that mr amber prosecutor reference is founded on testimony regarding the type of criminal pattern rather than utilizes the imprint of defendants prior criminal record what is wrong with that either as a matter of fact or law an abstract point of testimony i think there's something wrong with and i think that's why the defense didn't object to it now this is the state court decision right but i think her parading of the detectives evidence and then the prosecutor planned out i think that would have been permissible in france it's ok to say these crimes were committed by a professional thief but you can't say the guest guess who committed them i think there is a difference is fixed pair of tennis shoes bolt cutters and all these other paraphernalia charge with zillion counts right in there other people that use that apartment who live in their apartment that's with a book or so there was circumstantial evidence that pointed to other people and that's what the defense case was about is that this evidence points to lots of other people and it's not just me and so he's presenting a reasonable doubt defense he chose and this is part of the problem the president gets have to argue his case meaning the defense case you know he doesn't know as there was no problem with the prosecutor i don't think there was anything aside from man has prior convictions about his value that's the issue if i record established that you'd be right because you're not allowed to bring in that kind of stuff but here the record establishes to the contrary ms all kinds of evidence in the case of career criminal could not be someone who was never arrested or convicted before he could have been just lucky and committed oh i think three hundred burglaries and pray finally gets caught and the prosecutor said these burglaries  word and whenever anybody in law enforcement says career criminal your ordinary citizen thinks three strikes and you're out this is a really bad person and that's that's why he's here what about that i'm aware of any factual basis for that a