citizenship or some other type of permanent resettlement it did not the only evidence on the record of position or status in italy is a note in a d h s s report the petitioner had some kind of italian travel document and the titian was testimony that she had temporary status indefinitely renewable ready legals immigration status including a smiley refugee or similar status why why doesn't a refugee status that you can renew every two years fit within that definition the court has this court regulation requires an offer of permanent resident residence and there the court clarified the folding in child vienna i n s that had previously held that the length of undisturbed stay only without other evidence to the contrary can allow a resumption of firm a settlement but in alley the petitioner testified that he only had temporary status and the government had no evidence such as petitioners case here and the court there for found that the presumption affirm or settlement did not supply or apply and found that there was not substantial evidence to support a finding a st settlement that court the alley court also expressed the adopted the very specific language in terms of the government for that one says specifically offer doesn't have to be guaranteed but just at least have to be an offer some sort of permanent status citizenship or otherwise evidence and she says two years and it may or may not be indefinitely renewal but we don't know and she may not know but then we just move her a bottle profession case doesn't mean the government wins and then we've got  what troubles me actually which is to say the i j and the b i didn't pay any attention to the evidence about the boyfriend who is according to her testimony  d she raised the issue of even testing her asylum and also she mentioned that she had suffered at the hands of people and governments and again there was sufficient more than sufficiently raise that from the board which then should have considered that evidence she presented but if it was she was she she was at the time of the hearing yes and was she pro se in front of the that alone is sufficient when the grounds of a would be clear to the board of why that was denied well listen we've taken you cleared close to the under your time which you're from the government and we will then give you a chance to respond that difficulty was early donna and i interrupt for just a minute it was on published i don't pay any attention to it ok i am it is really hard to find a great line of laws just sort of curiosity why is it hard to get those records i mean that the italian government obviously has records of who they rented refugee status to or the seems like the sort of thing that you trust would be able to contact its cover party agency  think i don't quite aside from her particular documents are fairly easy matter to figure out what italian law you knows in terms of categories of people renewal in the non renewal immuno that would just be on the books in the to go with you for purposes my question what do we do with her testimony about the boyfriend who threatens her life who is at least close enough to the police that when they talk he's a friend and they go away we don't have any mention of that even though she's testified to it in front of the i j a and we have now been fact not only no mention of and i'm just reading from the  not did not address it because this was not in taliban the restrictions on her residency she never went to the police or herself and her as we've been with the problem she never went by herself she left to another town  where the person calls the reasons almost all the police cars the boyfriend goes outside talk to the police give them some money and they go away that's plenty of evidence that the authorities are unwilling or unable i mean just to see those cases all the time this looks like one alone now i'm not in a position to rule on it because we haven't heard anything from the b i a but it sure looks like one of those ca mentioned they considered forest her whether or not she was firmly resolved and they found that she had not done it and presented any evidence that she had not been which is reversible who represent her if you were to be remanded yes we would i would be interested in continuing my representation of that issue or any further question from the match ok before review are extremely helpful to the court we are very grateful for this and you've done a lovely job and i compliment you on the work that you've done and thank you now i'll say everything to the governor of the same thing except the same form of thank you because the governor you're