government workers at all and in the fair labor standards act you only get minimum wage you don't get vacation you don't get sick time which was of the vast majority of my owed monies and i would point out your honour's they still have not paid  today they did pay they have been paying for what they have been paying me workers compensation i do have a substantiated case to the did the injury caused by actually both defendants the new york under one ninety to challenge the constitutionality of it i did in my papers there was no response by the judge or and of course the attorney general has not been served in that case i did file the case let me i'm sorry you are trying to  challenge the constitutionality exactly of what a labor law one nine hundred says a government agencies are not employers basically labor law the if any private citizen was was basically robbed by their employer they could get up to triple damages for all their wages owed including sick in vacation but government employees for reasons that's never been explained to me are not covered under the law i believe it violates the fourteenth amendment of equal protection and you know i think it's on his face so i did attempt to include it in this case as in amend as an amendment and if your honour's would allow it i am hoping of course that you reverse  have not answered the case and you know if this case does not reach the level of a minimal inference of discrimination retaliation they legalized assault defamation wage theft defamation of the point of personally but the issues really was the attorneys at new york city transit authority who've done this apparently they deem themselves management and they seem to feel that they have control over the top whistleblower or maybe to serve as a lesson they believe that they can get away with literally assaulting somebody while they're operating trains with full of passengers and then to defer to openly defame somebody even though it's course done anonymously i still don't know who was the exact person who did it  and then to do complete wage theft his own are quoted cases where in this happens in any business where a check is missing or you know some of the mages aren't paid it's certainly not discrimination it's not disability when i was hired i have a copy of the of the you had to give me a certificate when i operate underground in it it's pitch dark and i would wear clear lenses or at night if there was no no street lights or anything it's also pitch dark even outside while you're operating trains and i would operate with flip ups so when i say if i was going you know from underground to to outside in the light in order so i could  see in fact this was one of the reasons why i took the job as a train operator i thought i'd try to turn my i disability into you know make lemonade out of a lemon and you know for thirteen years they had no problem with my disability and then they discovered it all of a sudden when  because of this supreme court case and other protected activity they just decided i could no longer be an employee and just by any means necessary they assaulted me and then of course defame me and then do and doing the wage that post well the new york post obviously assisted them only did what they did and they were i believe misled completely by new york city transit authority but it was you know they did it somewhat gleefully they i spoke to the post reporter and the post reporter never confirmed any any of the lies that she that that went under her byline and you know they obviously they never allowed me to do to correct it they still haven't corrected it to today and of course all over the internet it was defamation per se i proved it that the level of proof required to show to substantiate a claim of stress which was only based on that is substantial in new york state and have to basically prove wrongdoing that the stress is