please the court my name is scott meyers and i'm pursuing a request to certify certain defendants the case began in green county after we left lower manhattan a few blocks from here we went up to the mountains and were largely mistreated the first case that was certified by the federal district court was against filing i filed against other members of law enforcement in green county and a counselor from the army mental health ranty district court judge baxter suggested that it was speculative on whether or not i would be able to reverse the indictments which were for contempt of court for violating an order of protection which was for writing letters to our children those now have been reversed and stayed by the third department and i'm simply back here with that progress that's been made i've been the one doing the legal work we've also looked at the possibility of including the public defender in green county mistress get to row in a collaborative or oh i do understand that the u s supreme court tries to isolate the public defenders so that they can remain independent of the government and that would make sense but there's a there's a lot here that showed me that he was not capable of the arguments that were needed know the terms and i'm sorry i'm to stand it's sometimes you know we have a lot of technicalities and it's difficult for a white person i understand why it might become a i just you know the your case continues to proceed in the district court right all your claims were not dismissed only some of them were dismissed ethically they just missed with prejudice almost everyone except the muscle you know the problem is that things continue to accumulate one of the issues i have is to be safe in that county and the one but the others now were dismissed mostly because we didn't know what the results would be of the indictments so now we know the results of the indictment so now does that mean ok we're back in federal district court and those are now people and i'm suggesting that because the issues are separate from a d w i arrest that was defeated at trial thoroughly that there might be something handled better on the other hand and the efficiency of the court and my own time we put them together and we say all right who do we look at in this who do include who is allowed to be included and i disagree with the decisions so far of dismissing certain litigants certain defendants and because the stuff keeps happening i can't protect my family until i start to get some sort of traction i don't mind going back into the federal court i mean in the district court so i'm here basically either to take them as two separate courses or suggested we started the paperwork on that but then we have these other defendants and now that we know that's not speculative that those are going to be reversed then maybe we actually need to did they obstruct justice did they prevent me from getting to access to the ports claim that was also brought several of these claims were dismissed with prejudice based on absolute immunity for the a t f a the district attorney and several of the probation officers that issued pre sent reports and with respect to those i think that those judgments are final i don't think that a reversal of a conviction is going to be able to change the course term and on whether these individuals were entitled to absolute immunity you think their final and we have jurisdiction so essentially the the appeal is position is that this there is no jurisdiction over the appeal and even notwithstanding that the lower courts decision was completely supported by the evidence other one claim that mr meyers does make he talks about the reversal of the conviction it pertained only to one claim it was an access to the courts claim it was against the green county sheriff as well as the superintendent of the jail the district court dismissed that claim under the hack rule mr meyers did ask that the district court stay the cause of action until there was a decision on whether his conviction was going to be reversed the court used a discretion and said it would not stay there is decision it would dismiss the cause of action eventually his conviction was reversed and i would say that even with a reversal of the conviction the northern district still acted within its discretion in staying and refusing to stay because of action and  idea of whether a case is foyle or not was most of the conversation this morning and whether i'm not a pro se or not probably isn't a matter of my particular expertise or education so here we have something practical not only did the jail block me from getting an attorney it blocked me from having a notary that meant that my possessions my child it was lost i could lost that case in the supreme court in green county can even sue the people that took my possessions were not safe in greene county i think rightly or wrongly because it's practical that i can't go back and reorganize these particular arguments miss picks made the conclusion that they don't have any substance but we've been abused ever since we arrived in greene county and i can't even move back to two hundred fill the judge had to recuse the district but the district assistant district attorney puka he and his father represent our matrimonial property should have been prosecuting to begin with there's a there's an in there public pilaster a materials that are extraordinary as the person doing the arguing the public defender had to sit next to me i don't mind but he wasn't going to do what needed to be done the public defender couldn't even bring me paper and pencil i mean it was really extreme i think we understand your position we're going to take i do believe there is i do believe there is jurisdiction in this court because i can't get back into the federal court on the other of the other defendants i just can't seem to do it  rest when the part of the case that still pending is concluded then you could appeal everything that's what it would mean the bifurcation motion seems final to me because that's a different matter because is as counsel just and the reason for the to maintain the statute of limitations for a filing in this particular situation and i don't mind if that particular case isn't certified i'm not words but that at least i have for a while which is fine but the other defendants if we buy for kate and i can process that as a separate item ok thank you very much very much as i said will take the matter in