MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
each of you will have approximately fifteen minutes to present your i mean from that you may say about yet i think are to interrelate issues one is where was the status of those contracts after of the governor of first vetoed the original appropriation of would have paid for many of the services provided in the second is as any breach of contract claim against the government will be in federal court the federal courts and the supreme court have made it clear there is no really reach of contract claim against the government makes it it doesn't make it a constitutional violation  that it is against the policy to the payment of forms really have not been appropriated by the legislature or the general assembly has the exclusive power to make appropriations or public funds and no branch of government has th power so i want to say first just as a technical matter many people have said that the plaintiffs should be should be paid but no he has said it but it's only speeding but the amounts they claim are legally  scoundrels the contingency in those contracts is significant essentially the limits of the school to be obligations on those contracts and the the the relevance here is that the appropriations bill was is a key part of the continue services under a contract entering into the contract they can circumvent the appropriations for this which makes the general assembly which is the branch of government most accountable to the boarders the one who decides what payments are authorized and mitigated by the fact that people notice of the war which is they have no right to get paid unless the legislature appropriates funds for it and here are transferred specifically to put them on notice of that provision in real terms the provision in the constitution itself in it to the other parties but based upon the separation of powers of government in the constitutional structure of first state finance and authorizing our rights that's necessary to authorize funding but of course those parties i noticed that they are subject to appropriations and that's one of the difficulties of dealing with state government which is not like dealing with a private party and if you had a ship more to the dock that says you know really venders the captain is not  that is responsible for the rising payments to police or contractual services but it seems that has there ever been a pattern or situation in which even though these contingency contingency provisions were truly when the terms are changed as opposed to simply not being paid or are you going to appoint and if you if you do that's fine i do with queen not being able to get heat because of the lack of appropriations to changing the terms of the contract which actually say it was based on the ability to be appropriate of course yes this is an impediment i mean th
rifle it was a fire because if the fire balls then it was a gun that was maybe caught because it could not fire people and then it was a fire because this matter under advisement to sue the decision is due course
them and they'll have it available to do things i just wanted to tell you that you're not alone you're not beginning to get using this software it's been used throughout the country it was developed in the northeast it's
pages of all testimony from the complaining shakedown columns about everything ranging from the neighborhood he grew up in what his childhood was way what the crown was late in his area towards the end of his testimony talking about have been doing what he was doing there where we really hit some of the worst of this is when we look at the testimony  gets on the stand and she he has a couple of stories to tell in the first one is known that the jury already heard the story about mr hopkins and shakedown entirely and  what you might do in athens an issue where you were remand for a different sentencing more where you would remove an answer and that was imposed was for it wasn't doing that through that once but this court said was what we're talking about here is whether or not the jury was instructed on what are the in farmer was actually broken it was even a circumstance like this is to grant a new trial with a properly instructed jury is the problem here isn't whether you've got the right or wrong sentence the problem here is that the jury was not instructed on core of what happened or a few hearsay statements got in that relation and got men then you know we may be balancing a little bit more maybe we look at this and say well there was another there was a victim ideally so maybe it's maybe it's not prejudicial we're talking man in prison for eighty five years and under our current system of justice we believe that certain basic guarantees apply in the past to get certain things and one of those effect is as ins of counsel and no one can say that what happened in that
the interest in favor of disclosure prevail that he company that is interested in maintaining secrecy post trial mu contemplated and that would be very unusual but then what would be the purpose of putting this language in if you were not talking about non confidential information because the parkinsons talked about confidential information so there would be no need to even have this language if you work unless you're talking about non confidential information that all bit ready been released in the context of the trial and so are we to construe are two things then the truth could have been discovered by turning over the physical objects one with the whatever the then stroll information was used to produce them and the other would be whatever was record on the one hand and information it does become part of the judicial record this study is part of the judicial record and the spy case here in this court and also in cases in other parts of the country this study itself well lit i
the reasons articulated by the town of cicero that the rationale and the facts and the reasoning of the town in explaining that determination was because they were not real and it doesn't stand it's not there to make this in it and this case and the procedural posture so i'd like to highlight the fact that a finding of no pretext is reviewed under the against the manifest weight of the evidence standard not th good testimony by so sack a saying that that was the reason for doing it is also supported by the trade orders themselves signed by the town's human resource director which will sever traits from you because of the seriousness of the allegations not because of your ages or anything we don't like these guys at use was the word he used and he thought this would be too much pushback so i'm not going to recommend them for reappointment so that's right it was just a different time the circumstances were different the federal  discussing with respect to the differences in rank and the differences in the severity of the allegations of misconduct there's of the two points that sat this is a fire marshall column apart from the tenets harvey read admissions he read it's use of making inappropriate comments decide it again this case did the effect finder the fact finder said i believe that the town's decisions in this case were not motivated by petitioners ages in any way and that finally should be upheld because this court was not deference
see or hear them you and i and camels agree with more people than any other cigarette woman marion just bluffing i know what a door you know women take to crime more easily than men you know closer to the jungle nonsense especially when the george martin george what are you talking about new findings that she's mentally challenged i don't think i'm nothing wrong isn't no nothing told nothing at all i just thought you looked a little nervous by a wider margin than the previous year camels are fifty n a ten percent ahead of the second place brand the biggest lead in cigarette history this popularity lead makes clear that  flavor khamoshi agree with more people than any other cigarette now there is a reason for such a vote of confidence the more carefully people selecting their ads and they do select them carefully the more surely animals when people know you can count on camels costly tobaccos are more pure pleasure i suggest you smoke camels for thirty days and see for yourself what the facts show mildness are flavor animals agree with more people than any other cigarette look what happened when we had a cook we didn't like if you manifestations few pieces of furniture floating around by themselves out she went by i joe joe do you know that's right very simple problem really all we have to do is convince the new that the house is well flooded as a matter of fact it is good thinking after dinner tonight i appear to stir things up a bit terrify the new owners in a dome and their money back capital may be why it's got to work presto i wonder how we did that so you took an ordinary water glass and he put it inside the hat right any point in some water and he took out the glass and it kept pouring i guess i must admit something wrong hi i'm very fond of you on both those ridiculous we've got to do something like what why don't last think of something this time come on let's find  when the really good working louisiana and was with kansas the united states army stationed hospital forge a new york and all hospitals operated to the united states forces in your top were brought to you every week by the makers of camel cigarettes
you have been relieved of your sir i fully support you in this last ditch effort but i must stress the importance of a strong military posture at this moment again i urge a stage one alert including the a r s activation general get out of my sight mr president i said get out of my sight gentlemen we will place a little complete secrecy on this situation on the contrary so we need to list the eight of scientists from all over the world out of the question but mr president top secret now what do you need what do you need  this may be the last sunset we will ever see if we only had a little more time a speech writers are so fond of having a say about history of those who can't remember the past can i wanted my name to be entered into the history books but i wanted it to be for something meaning full something lasting what could i have done maybe it would snow might give us a little more time how my own said the virus remains dormant and cold temperatures you are never my enemy your station no sir there is no sign of any illness here and there is issues there are no reported illnesses at any of the stations and we are in more or less regular contact how bad is it mr president ashby through to the other and army bases all of them sir all of them right away mr president do not leave your sanctuary you know allow those from the outside to enter under no conditions try to return  i offer you no solutions no hope other than that somehow you may prevail this time try to work it out together please please and may god bless you  mr president i form the request that you under this authority granted by congress and by the constitution of the united states of america meeting your responsibility to the fan this great land is general don't speak in the interest of national security i'm activated
the three use or are required to give us a standard of review on each issue to raise and quite frankly i'm tired of getting breaks that don't comply with the supreme court r only have three down actors giving opinions against the claimant all right in the standard is there some sufficient evidence they're going to support the commission's decision how do you just exclude the medical opinions on the theory that you don't need them you don't need the posture of this case is different from the posture of national right there where you were affirming the decision by the commission that the second accident was an intervening accident and discussed the facts that case you know for me the manifest weight decision or on a manifest weight basis of firming the decision here you're wanting to reverse positions and say that there is a test that testified in my opinion on that in the in my it is my opinion this coin could claim its current conditions result of his prior accidents on aug twenty ninth twenty one april befor zero three and not the result of a new incident on december the thirty of twenty ten and in the face of it you want us to look at the medical records and say these three doctors were wrong and it was against the inflames and it hurts me worse but then again the information goes down and i go back to my original describe them do i lose causation
homeland security did anything with the thought between spanish and english throughout the encounter with our client and she did speak spanish there was a desire to go in the house and then the region consent it was just  this point there are consented to consent to sign inside the home where they have already moved family members to the living space they've looked around the house to check to make sure that there were no weapons state has their burden but what i found really interesting about the spanish cert consent to search for where the state wants you to take judicial notice and to give you this good chance to document you look at the google translate and you're like whoa for the first seven minutes we're just breaking the ice or asking him panicked questions of booking questions but that's not exactly true because they've moved into things like how did you get into this country on what terms of documentation  background and then they immediately follow them up with oh and by the way let's talk about if you cooperate there can be leniency in the corridor or by judges below the judge it's the ultimate decision and then they can easily follow up if this was their your house but we need some knowledge i think there was a purposeful violation of our handle because we also know they when they questioned a female who was involved he investigation upon  the interchange between the defendant and the three officers on the seemed to need to be consistent with a consensual approach can we talk to that sort of thing it was incriminating statement it is clearly the perception of what the defendant would feel interrelation will and there were three homeland security officers their own also one of the reasons that this whole encounter began is they were looking to get these inside the house or inside the garage but they didn't have enough evidence for a search warrant so we have to keep that it was only after her contacts that gonzo packaging material did help to further the investigation and it wasn't a geisha and it was brought up in the sentencing and he was also told prior to miranda that leniency would be conveyed to the judge and the state's attorney's office by the three homeland security officers
what happened in this case there are two hundred ten disclosures if you look at the route to their team disclosures the landowner has no opinion of the value of the temporaries his opinions of value in this case are based on the existence of a permanent easement that doesn't exist it was amended all of the case without an objection that's november second two thousand and fourteen so the rumors opinions here first of all there's no opinion disclosed there's no opinion in a deposition of the value of temporary ease as first the second thing is that needed a trial when the landowner is called there's no attempt to make a showing of his qualifications in read the transcript here where the man really one testified about is the remainder damage and that brings us to this point the trump rule in this case in terms of the with respect to all remainder based on the evidence that was presented at trial so all these issues that are going to raise the landowners testimony the woman whose testimony in compass is his consideration the probing these that that doesn't exist it are really before the court because there was no appeal of the decision that were made or damage could not exist did not exist in this case as a result of the temporary has been that there's an issue with them in the i think the numbers are three hundred even more in the other three hundred eighty six cases tracks the result by re trial is because the offers that were made were fair in this particular case the evidence bears that out the evidence shows that at trial the fair market value in this temporary newsman rose seven hundred dollars the final offer four times that two thousand eight hundred fifty dollars even disclosed expert who they decided to it was four times the appraised value and there's no prejudice that's been shown with respect to the with respect to the color playing the trial court ruled that there could be no damage from a major based on this temporary easement it relied on the trump why decision that has never been contested or that issue is not contested here on appeal the interesting thing about this case is that counsel talks about whether the landowner can testify court had proper basis in fact an unlawful make the decisions that it made on this date and the presumption and what the court should presume is that what actually happened that day when the traverse was heard is on issues of public meeting public purpose publicly available information they chose not to include the discovery responses and the documents that are pretty true produced in connection with that evidence that was presented at the only commerce commission to pay him that comes that less than fifty cents a day for his property for two years less than fifty cents a day if he was not allow that to come up on the stand now
morning before i left the house i took the other half of this nap my cabbage difference in the cabbage a lot of people use the green and red python around it's actually a pretty small mass of cabbage but i think the other trying to do it that is if you want to do it it's just a compass right for swearing kind of like a porn star and the reason you do that is just to get some n p started earlier and i don't think it does that much for the case but it probably makes a good slowly tiny and you know when you're putting green onions you never want to read too many at a time because you're going to have a hard  you didn't notice or cabbage but with the green onions i'm not bothering to wash them ahead of time because we are sticking them in water with cabbage i felt this morning i didn't bother washing it had time because i was going to be rinsing is kind of made similar but this is actually much more simple much more simple than that which is the thing getting it's kind of it is a category as well as it's pretty much anything  some in the back so this is  corner of the kitchen i've actually stuck it outside on a hot summer's day to say yeah some people do it just for fun now but it was just i think because the nat know we have some coworkers and i think they're just making a little googly eyes because we love our coworkers a lot of the stuff we are making at the cafeteria it's not so familiar from a lot of students but some of them are
i would indicate why you're walking up that justice jorgensen regrets that she cannot be here today of course you know our arguments are recorded so she will listen to the oral argument to before we run her decision  matter and then counsel i would indicate that we have received a motion for leave to file an appendix to your brief and is there an objection to the court allowing the motion proofs to be reopened the court actually did make a ruling and said that this would not change the result so the trial court actually looked at it and indicated that it because as i understood this woman he did not find any calculation on calculated risk by michael he did not find anything purposeful in f you sympathize with the fact that technology is challenging for certain people by made the comment that it was available all of the time that these proceedings were  my client never received the form himself because one when the original memo was sent to him due to technical difficulties he and he had to and he had to pick them so that so if he couldn't open it you're contending even a document he couldn't open constituted an offer that he accepted by device because he's not an i t professional like mr ker he he he he was he read it and he believes if this is how it works you are considered counsel in employment form we don't know what that is how does anybody know what that is and employment for him could be very well an application well loved and application is could be understood as employment for  before he participated and was told don't worry it is just merely paperwork you can completed  received the form he could not access each talk to the you see anywhere in the paper or somebody tells you there's a job opening you know you go to the place your contact them are now in asia you know one of those some home you need dot com and you make an application with your with whether or not they want to make in a way of the college so it was the college that had power to accept an offer not mr preston so he says in his complaint that the march th email was the offer and his participation man that thought in his head that if you have an application well somebody get it mean if you apply someplace doesn't mean you're going to get it unless the college pay money or the table but there's nothing in the record except mr newton's statements in the role playing memo and his statements to my client on the day in question now the there's a question that he had the authority to hire people as as set forth in this year and as set forth in his  my client was just not showing up my client responded to emails participated as an independent contractor two times as he was requested to enter and he and  after he heard about my client's interest in being a ballplayer where i don't know i don't recall that fact but my client attempted to set forth in his he was always trying to find everything he could regarding this case on his communication device it wasn't just yesterday the motion to dismiss was granted it's just that
torture and to remain in this case back to the b s a for consideration under the correct legal standards and with instructions to properly consider if a substantial evidence submitted by  is provided by question did not independently establish that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured by the games if he returned tell salvatore quote based on his christian faith and there's nothing wrong with me i commenting on what the evidence is why do you suppose they changed a legal standard they don't say  course i had my bike but when traveling to boston i took the train so questions attempting to clarify his answer about the train and in addition the i j a did not allow him to show it was sure he was that was after he was
time hearing his rule hearing there was no raise and counsel should have made the arguments or would have known to make the argument reasonably that she met a seven  to meet both of them correct yes and she didn't correct what we're arguing that she did meet the seven year requirements and i have here that go through the process of being able to analyze whether she was eligible for discretionary relief but as a matter of fact she wasn't eligible he was wrong about for seven years and he may well have been wrong our evidence was very limited because the kind that had passed away adjusted her status so that would make it ninety one now that you said ninety three and your b five year requirement which i don't believe that you emphasized in your papers now we didn't discuss that because the agency that in the scots that can i interrupt him but on the same really now precisely what the basis of that was because i didn't session in the five years it would have been obviously inappropriate concession them finding that they would have not found in favor of addition or are under the discretion they specifically state on there that they were looking at