two concerns the issue of the denial of a motion to continue and the third issue on appeal is the board's restructuring or redoing of a legal standard to encounter in the relief of cancellation removal to add the requirement that a petitioner must prove that medical help is not available in mexico now turning to the first issue met all the requirements for a grant of saw which is special agricultural worker except for one problem and that is that the application was nine months too late was it not  was missing from that medical exam now he was not given any instructions as to where to actually send a medical exam what to do with the medical exam he did actually have another medical exam taken with the h i b results missing that all he was told was that he needs to get a new medical exam nothing else and we're going to add a little bit of context you know we're doing with this with the saw our program these are field workers these cases not complicated we are in the real world we all have as attorneys we have clients many times my clients will move many times my clients their phone numbers are disconnected it then becomes incumbent on the attorney to actually look through the file and look through alternative ways of contacting people at the time of the interview and then later you know rectify that situation then they are their application is a provable which is exactly the situation that should have occurred in this case the regulation i refer to deals with this  second argument regarding the motion to continue the the administrative record is missing a key point part of this case and the immigration judge must have turned off the tape recorder what was the purpose of asking for  because dr birch did not make himself available despite having the fact that the client had paid him and you know he had he been paid for his testimony he was set up for a certain time just it's for some reason do he was not available at that time this was just a money would have gone to extraordinary circumstances yes yes but didn't the proceeding find that your client could not meet the continuous residence record one of the the review ability of the denial of the hardship determination yes i do this is an interesting question that that that perhaps those of us who do cancellation mover cases and i've been doing them f the the question comes down to does the responder stupid titian or have to prove that medical care is not available in mexico and the answer is no because if that was the case then you would simply never be able to win a cancellation of removal case the question is the standard is not whether it's available in mexico it's whether it's available in mexico through those particular aliens and i don't see how the b i can make a blanket sent out to the papago court address and then the thirty days later or i think just two months later the notice of decision was sent to the same matters as well it was sent to the last known address of petitioner the regulation does not require anything specifically the regulations provide that the service give written notice and in other contexts the regulations in another star contacts regulations require that comes back and deliberate will just it's ok for them to continue to sin notices to an address that they know doesn't work that's well you they are not they're not the post office they don't know specifically why they're certified service view it claims that this was his post office box yes but we do not know what is the address lies i think it's also notable that in his two thousand application for cancellation of a before the immigration judge and never lists the post nine months later yeah a response came in yesterday but nine months after the appeal should have been filed he apparently went to the immigration office to reapply for employment authorization which is what he had at that point he did not have temporary status and he was told that he could not get more employment authorization because his application had been denied at  it's unfortunate that took the services far howard during no none of the spears or any record ever since that petition or made any attempt to contact the service so the petitioners nine months one school's out services fourteen years any rights that he would have fifty years anything other than prejudice your honor because he was a lodger remain in the country he was not removed during the pendency of his application so absolutely no obligation whatsoever on the part of the government move with any kind of speed unfortunately