tonight for the agenda i just want to remind you that we're going to run this meaning in orderly manner consistent with the dear b s rules of procedure i will run just walk you through everything as we go along so you don't need them in front of you but if you want  for future reference you can always get a copy of the of the rules of procedure from jan when pointing at the entry chair because you'd be right that ok at this point i need to formally request disclosure of any conflicts of interest or any ex parte communication with board members anything me just explain the average person's rules i'm interested persons are those who bought under vermont law have the right to appeal an actor decision of those owning in the street or the d or the interested persons include the applicant s decision or act only those interested persons who have participated in a d or be proceeding may appeal a decision re entered in that proceeding in environmental court pursuant to state statute participation consists of offering to oral or written testimony evidence or statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding so if there were to be an appeal we don't make the determination of whether someone's an interested person that would be part of the appeal process but it is our responsibility to know who participated and so to help us in that and there is a sign up sheet is going around so if anyone is here to participate in any of the hearings tonight please make sure you sign that sheet ok one more piece of preliminary work because this is a quasi judicial hearing all those that intend to speak must be sworn in so i'm going to read the oath and if anyone wants to participate can be sworn in by just saying i do i hereby swear that the evidence i give in the cause under consideration shall be the whole truth and nothing but the truth under the pains and penalties of perjury thank you ok let's get started so the first is the glen ellyn martin conditional use you want to come on up or wilson will begin by having a presentation from the right is really going to give it a rest so presumably you have approval for conditional use for the apartments of the up stairs so if you if we did nothing if you made if you had not made this application you could have done that converted t dancers a restaurant where you're asking for is to change it to four for one bedroom apartments and not if we were to if we were to approve this then i don't know what his situation is if he decides to go back to can't just as it building office approved doesn't require a house to be built on i think it's ok that's an important thing over here so we'll figure that out ok i'm sorry leading us from the border for a go it's not the next step conditional glenda you said you have that letter from the to the school you know i just like to get that entered into the record all right thank you very much that's all we need and you'll be hearing from us within forty five days it is which you normally much quicker than that for us to for us to go through the process of developing a conditional decision so the next ok we're going so i guess i want to start off by asking what the status years of service here i know we're so we're being asked to approve a subdivision  and there i said there's it's not clear to the what's what's been surveyed and what is not in service to maybe you could explain that what's the physically course again until this is approved are one of my car not clear is the sequence of events here someone is going to have to place monuments to define the corners of the proposed office at some point that's me right there and does that done after the already install yeah ok good i understand that's good because it wasn't clear from the application what the status of them was and as you probably know we normally condition building permits and getting the state permits and was that's the whole lines up and down like dominoes from the state point of view we we we're all that the regs let us just defer that on a smaller law you're not allowed to defer you have to know what the status is you're because you're the idea is just so you know that the regs are trying to avoid creating one bill the lot so i guess the only concern there the only other concern i wanted to bring up was the one the gen brought about getting this we're getting this late but we're there for the reason that we care about this this plan is that there be one in place like i said or what the rules say that a lot less than a certain size there has to be there has to be a plan basically for the water supply so septic and water it or there has to be there or they have you have to apply for a waiver process to not do that essentially split off a lot which may or may not be build depending on the status it sounds like we don't need to do that process because you're in that you know in the process of applying we would just condition this down i'm getting out of the permit just like we always do with a new law and so that would be that would that would cover that and as i said before we there's no there's no reason why that needs to apply to all of the new lot the big one three because it's large enough that there's it's automatically waived that you're allowed to split in looking over the in the control of this over a guess so at this point i guess i'm going to go to public comment on this and then we'll come back to it again the rules are the same as i mentioned proposed and how many watts are there ok i can get that question answered for you either do it do you have other questions so just give me the questions we just try to not have to be there there be a back and forth tonight it's nice and small and it could be informal but let's just stick with the plan th our next question and it will sort of be answered by the access will be on my little money is it going to be a brand new road with a  based on what's available so if there is a new road going in there is that what the future holds more houses being built back there and so on it is a new road going directly across from a crowd which is where i live right on the corner so we would have another stop sign there coming out of that new road that is that's what so the first question what i'm sort of for we go for the back to answer this i have some other public comment that i want to put into the record  there's some other questions that we can get answered here so one of the questions was with respect to the water supply on the watts and we've already talked we've already covered that  there is a there is a question here that there is a jericho heights water system in this neighborhood and quote there's a question as to whether the houses to be added to this there is one proposed here would connect two to the jericho heights water system or not there's a question let's see third question is how does this construction here affect the brook versus two mile away is where is the electrical service there and where would it be fed from it is it going out there for effect a mile away or errors drive neighborhoods let's see another question about proposed is for size of houses or the single family homes or what  ok there's there's a question here about restrictions for about raising animals on these properties that's a question and let's see and and a and then there's a question about understanding which the waste water system areas and what the last well have production areas are and i think we've already covered that question but like just a moment i'm going to come just one bag i've been going through and getting this trouble coming into the record ok so we got those comments in and now we're going to try to go back and answer the questions that were asked so let's see let's let me let me go back to the the beginning so we what's proposed here is a three lot subdivision that's to say that there are three locks one of them is already developed there's a house existing a second one which is denoted as lot two is proposed to have a new house placed on it and the third lot gets one from the subdivision that's designated like three years not there is no building on the local proposed on this lot at this time at this time to the question about how many homes it's there's it's a three lots of it's one lot about it into three one of those is a new building i'm not sure so second question was this new access out that the rules are different for future development of these forces on the district versus that there was some question about whether for example there would be one of the other questions here was about clearing and again this this is  i think that answers those ok i think that was it was right and we always got was that we were that there were several questions in this list about the waste water systems and and and the protection areas and i think that they were said that they've given us a response an answer in the form of this new sceptical sign  which we didn't have before ok so there's no question in the public comment is about the waste regs whereas the other ninety point five certainly would be although again there are a lot of the minimum lot sizes are different in different zoning districts or under the present rate is there there's but there's still ninety acres to do that which is to review the minutes of the number of the meeting of the eleven flattered i looked at the minutes and i didn't see anything so i'm going to i'm going to move that we accept the minutes of the july eleventh twenty for teen meeting as written go to deliberative session to work on these