MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
so my boss it was a civilian and so on and only then you know the time i have to be and one military is and then every six months we have that fourteen months and it was you know it was a nice place to stay but except you can't go to too many places and the closest place it was thirty miles away and in while we have a chance to go down to you know postle on a weekend you know that so on you know but i don't know mexico and you're not going to new mexico back then is that why open space and had the real you like like janet computor rice election machines you know i don't think people realize that back to the interest rate you say that i was in finance at the time and i think that's why i was probably thirteen or fourteen percent of the right he was paying
advance notice about it upward variance but now that it is but that's not really that really doesn't apply anymore and it really doesn't carry over to the notion of whether or not a condition of special release pronouncement but just to others over the several others on the immigration law condition why isn't that covered by the standard ok i'm just trying to understand it on that i didn't ten day notice isn't that sort of an image a straight of detail once you once you have to notify somebody of something isn't the court conform in other words why wait why aren't you saying ok go back we man and let's clear up if your client wants the medication or if your client wants to go see a spare standard conditions are automatically imputed into the oral judgement if it's a standard condition and so it is if the judge had said it you must notify somebody when you change jobs do you then expectation of a particular sentence say you want to show up being prepared to argue for or against any sentence in the in the range but that's different in a circumstance where he has no opportunity to argue we haven't talked about the latter are you aware of any case ever in the united states where a defendant is revoked and jailed because they didn't comply with or in law your honor i'm not sure if i'm aware of the written judgment now it makes perfect sense that in the context of the sentencing hearing the judge didn't rattle off sort of the regular stages of the mental health treatment program including the prescription drug medication condition they just i'm fine with the battle help question is the additional requirement that one would be violate their supervised release if they didn't take prescribe medications etc that's a fairly significant addition to the notion of just taking mental health treatment is there on your own or the government's position is that a prescription medication is necessarily part of mental health treatment it's part and parcel is client is subject to all the standard conditions and you can show up and say your honor i've looked at their conditions and there's three we don't want to apply so aren't you ineffectively notice exactly the same way that if the judge said i'm applying all the standard conditions i think in theory maybe but that's not the way we're going back as a writer i mean certainly lots of comments and attorneys would know that and they would respond appropriately but lots of people wouldn't know that that what happened is that what happens under your rule where the judge says right time for sentencing on the boat it was standard conditions and now let me move on to the special conditions are you under any more notice that you've got to to both sides in this case for the arguments of briefing we will submit
with prejudice no as a train that's all seen anyone was sent to the adjuster on january twenty seventh two thousand and sixteen and i think what's interesting in this particular matter is the particular case is very very very much fact driven and i think it i think it's difficult to just be able to say whether it's one here for eighteen months or two years your hon no question that just because the ira gave the dialogue back and forth is not good enough i get that i resent my respected future but in this particular case in this particular circumstances i think it warranted the facts before this court and i
oh here's something that isn't nonsense we've got mike bender on the line mike is the owner of the i believe it's a sprint phone isn't it sprint yes it is you know where i would put my sprint store where cross never even indian burial ground once you get a minute in the meantime in the meantime i'll settle for your version of it i'd really like to get the dogs i have you i spoke with him about it ok so well then you can you can bring it yesterday or whatever it was watching us tell us a story let me set it up mike bender owns brutus the dog who allegedly has found what they believed and they're still there still not sure it's a human body are you sure it's a human body oh absolutely there's no doubt in my mind ok go up then to go ahead and tell us exactly what happened that you were sitting around on the porch swing with dylan and you let the dog out and what happened actually what had happened was you know the girls they step outside does smoke and they bring the dog outside with them and they've been excavating this area next  demolition in some buildings and he'd been trying to get down into the hole that they had dug for a couple of days ok what's the exact location i suppose that we've been teen fourteen indianapolis ok so you're are you almost indiana almost in whiting or we are in white or were robert stay on whiting ok wait a minute we're going to you and i are going to argue i guess are you in hammond or are you in why i'm in hammond physically physically in hammond but you feel like you grew up in some look like he had you know like like a little chicken bones or some rocks in his mouth or something so i girlfriend kim and i removed some of it from his mouth and it looked like chicken bones he just started oh wait a minute didn't didn't it wasn't a dead giveaway well w bad case of diarrhea so it wasn't in the right occur curry powder all over the all over the doghouse right it wasn't an indian was it a mexican no no because you use you spit it out so i'm thinking it might have been maybe from this neighborhood maybe it maybe things of that nature and i says well are you guys sure i suppose if this is a deer or something it's got a funny looking skull looks kind of human so while the police officer came out and he looked into the position where i told the skull was that he definitely radioed back to the police setting on top and there was a small maybe like a birth stone and there like it looked like a blue or a bluish black like me a little you'll think this might appointed if it was a good one i think you're trying to get my girlfriend a ring and all get out of the fruits of the pawn shop composition right and there although there was still some kind of fleshy material the hand you know but it could have been because it was wrapped in plastic you guys should've waited til holloway and for this thing really oh yeah well they definitely need to go over to the greyhound station wherever it is a nab somebody that's higher volume and all the usual suspects and i think i think it was maybe that martin fahy guy the bum that lived under the bridge i think he probably killed this person
defendant to see an opportunity to say anything he wanted to say and was willing to listen to anything there that he wanted to say i think at that point the court with her first statement after th make sure that there is no error and that the defendant is actually happy with cancel and has no compliance yet at that point in time he gives the air before the hearing one more chance it gives basically in the same spot in the same position as he was on sixty just because of the very very big interchange between the different in the work has to do with
seat there's somebody else back there with the gun so it's not is the question is not whether there's another passenger in the car it's whether there's another passenger in the car the where it's right where they can get it is there a reason that we should interpret this statute differently
in this case were sufficient to create an issue of fact year old and ninety year old and they don't appear to have any problems you know wait two years for a trial and then punish them because they didn't take an evidence deposition that your argument we this federal court that would be that that deposition would automatically be in evidence that position right procured i mean we're one of the few states left in the country that still have discovery  ok so you use the word judicial wrong we should limit the amount of testimony which takes the court's involvement to those issues that cannot be refuted under the dead man's act then why not let his evidence your emissions come in what about the rule that says on discovery depositions taken under this rule may only be used for admissions made by a party now talking about whether the parties alive or can't use the deposition it doesn't appear that she'd ever consider it the admissions of this deposition whether you want to say that they're conclusive as to summary judgment or whether the
ford has been in illinois since nineteen twenty the the trial court indicated nineteen twenty two years they actually gave you a couple years but it's been him since nineteen twenty of no one of those four room don't have a transnational aspect we don't have the parent subsidiary question we've got to be focused question of general jurisdiction the concept of whether ford concerning registration in a given state are you saying you don't have homes here but looking at the specific wording of any specific registration statute one can become sound and it depends
the if the issue is a question of where the is individuals or employees are in that correct correct yes where should the department of the question isn't there ever ever news for example i that in this case the reason that it went to the deal why my client the as a purely for an appeal the deal i because that's what he was told to do and then after the hearing was said we became involved if if if we alternately get to the question of employee versus independent patrick then we would have the standard i think madcap traversal standards for it's not whether they're over the road truckers it's we don't have fifty employees we have six so it's a question of patrick whether the contract is behaving appropriately understand it to classify the employees by classification clerical truck or whatever and apply the n c c i premium correct yes ok when they did all they have to came in under the patrick which they were allowed to do do would be not to see whether they had the appropriate number of employees from their perspective and see whether they were applying the appropriate road truckers you always three hundred thousand dollars the issue was nat whether the premiums were correct or the classification was correct it was these are our employees period correct i agree with cat express and the hearing officer consistently consistently used those two terms or operator in travel interchangeably but as she expressed very clearly shows that those are not interchangeable terms yeah the standard for review was a her feel it's not meant to be are waiting organization here the national council of compensation insurance through its appeal board hazard in any case and he decided let's get right to the point before sixty two for sixty two says the department will review a dispute with respect to the application of the grading system that's not the issue here is i s
cation or a fundamental right at stake but the beard in griffin line say that heightened scrutiny applies when more severe punishment is triggered by inability to pay a criminal fine or this special concern with the intersection between provision for certain driving for certain purposes and in analyzing the things i think you need to replow into your analysis not keep saying that there is constitutional problem with those peanuts bandits were one size fits all payment plan that does not take into account individuals ability of pay and each of our planes just have alleged that they could not afford a payment at the level at which they were and the lot of us does that answer your question are well what but don't they have the people who have these drivers licenses can't they have both of the interests it's important to focus in on what that classification is in order to evaluate whether that relationship and satisfies the heightened form of scrutiny if there is a guarantee of consideration of ability to pay and so i clean and strong opinions even though you might say oh i can't even pretend well i suppose that would have to be evaluated on a case by case ability to pay was necessary under the constitution even though there would be no guarantee in any single individual case of an affordable pima but then we have in the records as we have  if so is the real problem just that people aren't told what to do was at the problem no your honor the problem is that different courts are handling best in different wholly discretionary ways and so some of them are choosing right there right your honor some of the courts are rd installment payment plans to some of the plaintiffs and told them there was no other option even if when they told the court they were not able to pay th other hand the state has a strong interest in not encouraging this fall off and in deterring these particular people from driving and safely home is it overall just a fit problem if it's predictable and individualized and so on and partly is supposed to reasons seems to me that the skin is not very well adjusted to or even that at all it's just she was trying to be accomplished if you think was trying to
that's i think everyone probably agrees with that the central question here is whether the state prove that he violated the sex offender registration act by first career he was required to register under the act and probably more significantly whether or you've failed to register at another unspecified address what to what in terms of your your position what makes him required what requirements are necessary for him to heard that defendant was required to register as a sex offender through people's exhibit one and i apologize if there was two people's exhibit points but i'm referring to the trial exhibit one which was the form that the defendant filled out with the officer which went over  the requirements of registration and  it's an admission that he had previously been convicted of the sex offense of aggravated kimo sexual abuse based on that form not that he is in meaning to the current charge which is a separate church and i'm just saying that sense to have the state share bush where residence be was they provided there is testimony that he was going to iowa and staying with the defendants and you could infer from a very few going to iowa and also holding that job down the aisle that in all likelihood he was staying at some fixed interest you know you're close enough to his normal here was simply that he was staying with this girlfriend he has a good knowledge that he did file some sort of work but again we don't know what kind of work if it's something like some for day labor work it may be in different locations within that
hi david the bruce this is the creative good where we celebrate everything in the creative commons today we are continuing our series on the woman march on washington which despite its title happened over the world yes and in our last episode we took a look at some of the places around the world and gave you a glimpse at that worldwide event well we have ten episodes and in each episode we take a different aspect of what happened and today we're going to focus entirely on paris paris france what happened in paris you're going to see the people you're going to see the signs that they carry you're going to hear the chants and songs this is going to be great today we're taking you to paris and oh well i think both leave a hole that's something that had really more to do with the u s the u s president that demonstrations that marches would break out all over the world people are concerned and they really want to stand up for human rights i think that's the way you could characterize the in just a couple words human rights what this whole thing was all about so
issue alone conduct which causes damage to students damage the fact they wish to the school itself that could not have been correct if warnings had been given by the teacher
don't we have a myriad of cases that provide what the procedure isn't follow that the proper remedy is a tax objection to see if it's only your procedural issue that's disagree because i think that the i think we have to do two provisions together to understand what this is it's the same thing that there is a process by which so the democratic party nominates somebody  you can win six churches ok he gets his fifty bucks back off of this particular property so what it's on his tax bill next year and next year and next year nothing ever happens so the question really the present time and in recent years to the burden of property taxes and of course if the general population goes through the property tax a
evidence concerning the use the biggest fixed now i think twenty seven years old or thereabouts did make it did connect two fundamental factors that i think are important fairness and reliability and there's nothing in the law nothing  look to developing scientific analysis with respect to i would suggest occasions now why i say that as a preamble is the following with respect to the two memory if somebody has to make that determination it sounds like to me that you're asking us to accept the expert when i think that's the role of the trial judge to make that initial cut that it's that it is the role of the trial judge to make th in position number for a number six one individual that was short here again based on the science that was before the court none of those individuals are going to be selected because they do not conform to burble  this is the government's exhibit with respect to photograph fifty three graphic number three in the photo spread joy brown stated that well she didn't think that necessarily that photograph was excluded because here's what articulated description and the reason why they made that determination is part of their manual was if this very verbal memory aspect that i'm describing was an individual articulated description that's what they're going to fall back on that caved agreed that it was a given because there was only a single photograph in mr beck situation we have the same basic situation there's only a single photograph the photograph the booking form you have to require that meets the changed his testimony in front of the jury in court and a member there was there was a motion hearing made before there was a trial first trial no mention of this in the first trial it's only the second trial in july so for many to draw  stand considering their interaction with an individual just in the general society people are not taking notes there you're talking about somebody that they knew that was the guards in which the court had constrained the presentation of
funding but i'm confident that to have been implemented there on both civil penalties i believe it's up to fifty thousand dollars but i may have my number wrong as well as criminal sanctions that have been adopted pursuant to the situation pollution a violation over riding public policy of the national safety on policy and economic well being united states such as any other issues i think
a lot of families families and kids come in and get an ice cream today it's definitely a family environment you know very family oriented plenty of people everybody just have a good time a little bit about the ticket distribution i mean it's been pretty crazy
your answers are your prayer your prayers into the forever imagining life as living are the dark is the light waiting to return we have the right to remain human visualizing our own sanctity reaching out into eternity got us a love angels of the light here we stand united in fright fallen we sense compassion and light forever light please don't leave us tonight my answer is your answer we simply are together let us pray only for peace love and harmony appreciation and compassion  truth be known beyond feeling thoughts no longer a drop water as pure  truth spoken out loud what do we have to lose to review ourselves to be blasted blessid creatures i dream of things unseen i dream of the beauty unbroken out in the distance the universe must still be holding on for i am no longer strong i dream of life without the rest destruction no longer our best i dream of goodness restored to splendor to infinity i surrender fragments of greatness isolated mirage is the dormant so lies the infinite of infinite loss of infinite sorrow of the infinite tomorrows fragments of one of once was the survivors of countless wars on the edge of the final a business or is it learning finally that all is bliss don't you miss the way people used to kiss before the flood before the fire before all the goddamn how we miss the simple spear of life the broken shattered fragments once and for all time always crying together enough is rising together enough is love is simply love we have all seen enough sacred standing up to the flames walking past doubt and blame walking up to the flame as all eyes burn the heart is the same walking through the ring of fire red and blue all i hold onto you walking through the flames our dream will not die our world will survive this chaos of the pass this too shall pass i hold on to you walking through the flames the heart is the same the heart is a flame burning night and day this too shall pass life is not insane the heart burns eternal walking through the flames i hold on to you we hold on to each other we are the flame in one another walking through the flames the wind blows arrows pierce the flesh the heart flows the wind blows the mystery rhymes the test of time out of the mind the heart flows centuries come and go foolishness already past the heart owns the night and the tomorrows the heart flows mad who loose a nation's as the mind finds out only in the heart survives time and jesus come together come together the ages calm come together this is the shelter this is the shelter away from the storm within the circle all tribes coming together away from the storm all tribes coming together this is the age these are the times coming together all tribes coming together away from the storm peace a mother truth be known beyond feeling thought no longer a drought water as pure as truth spoken out loud what do we have to lose to reveal ourselves to be placid placid creatures of god