credible by the immigration judge but the corroborating evidence that was submitted was viewed to be to lack credibility and therefore this perceived lack of credibility resulted in an average credibility determination by the immigration judge and because of that the english judge denied the entire claim however the petitioners the minutes that an adverse credibility finding must be the statements that he provided in the his own personal statement was consistent however she had a problem with three particular documents one the marriage certificate to outs there's a whole lot of cases that talk about the fact that certain omissions clerical errors or even just the failure to have a box that lists the date of birth do not been a fair amount of fraud in terms of immigration documents duplicated or whatever but that nobody actually knows what they're supposed to look like certificate or notice a fine and in this case she basically says i have problems with the admissions of the resident identification number of the alien and his wife but that's not something that the alien or his so i don't believe that the i g can find fault with the alien because the document was prepared in that fashion in any event i like to continue with the  arguments that the government has made and the government has basically said that all right even though we have an i g that found the petitioners testimony to be credible however that can be wiped out entirely by what the state department country reports say well if you were adopted after zation then every single asylum seeker from china who has had problems with the family planning unit from the period one thousand nine hundred ninety ninety five could essentially have their son claims denied based upon one document that the state department presents and i don't believe that is something that is fundamentally fair and i believe that is doing versus ashcroft case that recently was credibility finding so the only that part of the decision is in front of this court substantially the roadmap here would be if this court decides it would affirm the immigration judge's decision incredibility that would be the end of the matter on the carried over to the other two documents which she talks about the notice of the fine document she makes it very clear that this is not on the printed form that i've usually seen any time you know before that that is inconsistent with the normal form that i have seen in other cases regarding the document this case is really pretty simple as to the marriage contract you found it was unreliable the marriage certificate of record one seventy three she found it was unreliable because as well it doesn't give an address and it's not on a preprinted form like the family planning well there's no evidence to suggest that somehow criminal fine documents in china are the same as family planning no biggest devilish government in city hall and some of these little towns but i think some of the things that the immigration judges consistently see in these documents are the names of the people some identifying addresses and most importantly these identity numbers that seem to always be there when you're going to find people in china these residency numbers because everybody in the village is registered everybody has a registration as you don't need to get to the issue of corroborative evidence however having already addressed it i think the the judge needs to support the average for the only finding with substantial evidence in this case there isn't any the state department country reports necessarily includes findings of documents that are produced from that particular island even though the pink hand falls within the region of