shows he knows about this case right well the record i shall and he's done a very well developed record and it's what makes it so unfortunate correct but what the record does show is that after his daughter was attacked and he felt in in great fear of what would happen to her and of course the the reality is that the government there isn't sufficient support now in the record which the judge doesn't acknowledge for example there is his refugee card in the rations card as well we can surmise you know from the set up is that if you're in the camp you can obtain some amount of food but if you needed to leave the camp as he says his family he had to put them in in hiding they would not have any form of any sort or anything to eat unless he was able to provide them and he's not able to go outside of the camp and obtain employment and support them so he comes to this country and he applies for asylum i think that gave then be extreme lack of access to letter from the stranded pakistani organization letter to the editor asking for help from the government because they're being severely attacked by you know goes from the outside and so i think that in those conditions  secondly you have a lot of documents that he submitted in support of his case that the judge doesn't even mark into the record it doesn't say they're admitted or not admitted and he goes off on the issue of whether or not there's enough corroborating there's no corroborating evidence and he doesn't make a negative credibility funny person they are it's a little bit of a hodgepodge of decision making starts from here and there but you have substantial documents in the record identify him as bihari you know talking about the dire circumstances under which he lives in the refugee camp discussing the death of his father and there's absolutely you know all of knowledge made of those documents by the immigration  whatsoever of the documents submitted by the a difficult situation in which mr hussein rends what the court or lived excuse me what the court must decide is whether he has demonstrated that the record compels reversal of the immigration judge's decision as i have a respondent respectfully submit that in addition and persecution must be on account of one of the protected grounds and in this case its respondents position that mr hussein did not demonstrate that he was harmed in the past on account of either his bihari ethnicity or his sunni means shiite muslim religion i think responded respectfully submit that substantial evidence supports the immigration judges decide both on the finding regarding past persecution and on the finding regarding persecution in the future mr hussein's claim is basically premised on attempts by i'm known individuals to extort money from him and one situation in two thousand his daughter there was an incident where his daughter was on him because of the protective ground in addition to trying to absorb money yes your honor that's possible but in this case the perpetrators never indicated any basis for believing that they're targeting him was on account of his ethnicity indeed mr hussein reversed them in his testimony as a people who attempted to extort money from him or at the terrorists only and in light of that respondents admit that there is no evidence that mr hussein was harmed on account of one of the protected grounds namely his ethnicity or   if we look at mr hussein's brief to the board at pages five to ten of the record was never raised and mr hussein was required to do that in order for the court to consider it so religion with respect to the issue of exhaustion he responded on appeal did raise the question of the documents that were not considered by the immigration judge in the decision so in just argued will be submitted for the season and we will now hear argument in newman versus the city o