appeal the there's two issues in the case the out of the main issue is that the will fall blindness instruction that was given by the court to the jury was improper to be given in this particular case and then the secondary issue was insufficient so you have you haven't in regards to the st issue the latest case to discuss that will or at least the latest case that was discussed by  drill with another individual person by the name of camerino for choosing your drills with that person from vegas to des moines hours before a courier are contradictory statements the bottom line is he said that he didn't know i client and the person the order the drugs from to morrow and i didn't know my client the only person that knew my client was this your guy who was in the car with my client was never called and testified by the government so what my client you work to know from the government's presentation of facts came down to  the presentation of that happens to a witness that the government did not call that person is the one who asked my client open a bank account where the money went into that's the person that asked my client that's the person that moved the drugs from one car to another car and that's the person that was a fault in hiring the courier this for teats so that person who was the bridge between what my client do or didn't know is significant about that is because as the government indicated there bridgie from shortly after the body was deposited to my client's account he took it out of purchased the vehicle and purchased insurance for the vehicle and the other money was used for road trip expenses which would be consistent with somebody saying hey i don't have a license can you drive me from vegas to hawaii and i'll pay you for your entire winter in trouble for that there's no indication the only person that would be able to establish that my client knew that that was drug proceeds or anything you legal would be carmina himself and he even testified he wasn't called by the government testifying the other significant thing of the four cases that are drug related one of those cases the coconspirators are talking about using drugs in front of the defendant in another case somebody spade three thousand dollars a month to store clothing at their house their drug courier that by by the person that procured the drugs as this is my partner this is somebody that i'm teaching the ropes to so there's there's direct facts you know all of those cases that the person knew or should have know that they were involved in a drug conspiracy that doesn't comply none of those facts are present in this particular case it would be what this is just give it to the f s is to go and purpose with a trip there's no facts stating the purpose other than at the time that gallup was arrested or detained arrested when he attempted to leave town before the dru he has a during those two minutes so my goodness if the here if you look at the i was fed case the fed talks about the time and the environment justice kennedy i think at the end of his opinion only mentions those two that could be wrong but he certainly mentions the time and the environment messages were about getting together and making the trip there was nothing specific to try horrific drug cohen during those text messages between those two guys and as far as the jailhouse phone call that my client new to this girlfriend of the time he indicated that the case was about class that they the cops found some class and indicated to her that she didn't have anything with them and he wasn't at fault it ends she didn't make any or there's a number of things that look problematic i get that vibe that falls more in the category of mere presence than it does into willful we doing something that we're through the technical issues of getting things started today and we've been having virtual arguments still for several months and this is the most glitches thus seen in one particular