f so but is with respect to other you know which is really one of the main concerns and that's what all my stress is is that you know listen and also you know this is one reason why we can't just look silly at the language of the statute these are playing out in communities tha said no way of knowing but i think she might have been amenable to that right i mean if someone said judge as we read this he can't work at mcdonald's next to someone who's making he can't say how long to a gay member in the hallway of a school here if his biology lab partner is a gang member he's in violation and the judge there's at least a decent chance a judge would say oh well that's not why i did let me clarify the reason why that didn't happen this is why it didn't happen but you know c seventeen year old he's in special education program you know what some people might do in his situation might be different than what can tim i do think scanty is in changi exactly how this case proceeded legally yet it wasn't the one saying are and you're talking in terms of a hypothetical and when we're talking in terms of a hypothetical we can't use the same as applied analysis that the minor his raised in this present case so let me explain why because even in the library or even in the classroom it's the minors connections in relationship with gangs met gang members problematic still he's in fact having however has to have a relationship with a slap i've met and that  a deeply rooted member of a very dangerous game in chicago this juvenile court is well within its ability to do this might impose on probation not to have contact with that individual but that is the point i wanting to comply with parole for me it's really difficult to comply with this order no i think and order is very clear for this miner and he understands the exact kind of contact and the individuals that he is not supposed to be having basketball team members who are gang members that doesn't count did she give him the any prayer matters of exactly what whenever a relation being she was very clear and that he was not to have contact with gang members and i have to emphasize and you  session is that the only way that we could have had this probation or a modified is to rule that the entire statute is unconstitutional this entire statute is certainly not unconstitutional and there is no will because on appeal wit procedure in this case and was now asking this court to stay in the conditions of his probation based on these imaginary circumstances but it is true might make the conditions of his probation unconstitutional but this is not a  but i think context includes everything and every time you talk about conflict you start modifying words like relationships and deeply rooted which is not what the order says contact is i touched just this the justice here on the armored car after i say h unconstitutionality and here he had an obligation to raise these issues with him and including this constitutional challenge to raise it first in the trial court and to bring it to output attention and say this is unconstitutional as applied to my situation because of x that the counsel for the juvenile brought these things up but it's not as if she made this in the back and had no idea what she was doing exactly she had she was aware of the mayor's familial situation which as we see in the back of it whatsoever anyone in the mayor's family was a member of the gang nobody in him there's no evidence anyone his will that he has that anyone in the workplace was a member of a gang and the truth of the matter is this clear that the juvenile court could ask an infinite number of questions of this might but only individual who has the knowledge and who knows how this restriction might impact his own specific circumstance if the minor in south so i want to leave you with today is that this miner has the ability to return well but as everyone knows you know this court should decide the case on one constitutional grounds if it can there is a requirement that all probationary conditions and restrictions must be reasonable in this case is not reasonable is only because they're