MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
sit on their hands and then there's it seems like there is no decision i mean how do you how do you think the way to force their hand is to at least file a sixty day within sixty days w correct it's new if an employee did not know of it in other words if they thought they could strike and had no no information not in the larger sense of whether the policy itself exists but doesn't the employee have the right to know before they take an action that directly penalizes their benefits well then good that's not t asked me if i want to know if i go out on strike am i going to have a problem with getting paid or with getting health insurance where it's such an employee go to look not the internally within your coding people the same then the state provided asked me that information prior to the decision of the board it was certainly presented part of the exact reverse decision i don't know whether it was exchanged prior to that important to me prior to the final decision and asked me what had no documentation they could have reasonably relied upon that proved this was a preexisting policy is  executive directors and then the arguments really get to start part of the board's decision you know ok thank you so much for bearing with me and to one final point it is even
went out and i found this transcription and i thought we could play and tell the whole story remind everyone about it and i think that's a good mandate to go to work on this transcript so i know thing in the talent business you have been so long as i have my finger on it all the time i have my finger on the pulse of my life i remember one time when i was handling  tender you know ok washington george
here other cattle that provides the meat for your table producing these cattle involves nearly the whole economy of the united states just to give an idea it takes grain to feed the cattle it takes tractors to plow the fields that and steel and cement to build refineries and the railways to carry the steel and cement and the gas and the tractors and the grain and the cattle and the banks to finance everything all during these activities profits are being made big profits as big as armers and that is why the price of meat is so high the sales dollar argument hides all these profits profits must be figured on the basis of investment that's what profit means to our banker to an economist what businessman g e is a good example which shows why let's take nineteen thirty three and nineteen forty seven add a freshman year and a boom year in one hundred forty seven they made nearly six times as much here or their profits no question about it g e is making much more money now than in ninety thirty three now sales dollar argument gives g e ten percent profit at nineteen thirty three only seven percent in one hundred forty seven in nineteen thirty three d actually had a higher rate of profit maybe they ought to go back to the depression clearly as of now take profits again and compare them to investment as bankers do it's a different picture from for rated nineteen forty seven is twenty percent practically five times above nineteen thirty three this makes amps very high volume of profits are very high profit rates everybody's happy except the consumer beyond a reasonable degree of profiteering as shown by the amount of money made on each worker here is the total of g e profits before taxes here are westinghouse profits and here are general motors a grand total of seven hundred forty two million dollars these three corporations employ over half a million people a total of six hundred forty thousand workers for every worker therefore these companies make twenty dollars a week profit twenty dollars a week on every worker every week they average wage at this time was about fifty one dollars for every five dollars in wages the companies made two dollars in profits you would think these companies would be ashamed of themselves but big business has no shame for big business has no so it's all for profit big profit centers nothing for people's needs profits which they make through control direct controls and indirect controls but always real control over the whole economy of the united states we know the facts of this picture thanks to the investigations of the roosevelt administration eight big business groups control over thirty percent of all the assets of the united states because of their ability to manipulate inflation is enriching the monopoly and it is hurting the people it must be we the people have it must call  easy to say but hard to do reaction towers over our daily lives seemingly all powerful e f there is a mighty a power a power of far greater than well the power of people organized and united widespread organization built up through years of hard work a happy life for ourselves and our children a future we can
the convictions involved an individual an individual count with respect to whether or not they provide those individual services i think when we were arguing about the last hour our position was that while there were many instances of claims that were not correct state and there is evidence that provides a rational estimate maybe there are other rational estimates too but that's not our concern our question is whether this number the four million or so amounts to clear data you're looking at to get to that it's approximately five hundred eighty thousand extra dollars on research and seeing you're looking at twenty two thousand five hundred additional claims over the course of ninety six months and when you boil that down that comes out to about eighteen i mean i think that i mean they're not district court judges they're not we are i mean they came in and they they they were their descriptions were unchallenged by the government and in fact the government cross examination frankly sometimes tease out further important points including the important point your honor of time range so you were just trying to deduct for services that he actually performed that's correct and you know anything at all about the number of hours per game that  and correct and that was that was the testimony that the district court relied on there was also testimony from from the two physical therapists regarding the number of patients that they were  about about twenty patients per day it corresponds to the notion that you're treating a patient for about twenty minutes fifteen to twenty minutes each that are going to come up to about twenty you all right mr to let you finish up sentencing was four million eighty seven thousand so the allegation is not a ten million dollar payment it was a ten million dollars fine with respect to your honor's question about what do we know about a workday we got or we can look at the government surveillance and the government
instruments for sure instruments i'd say a little bit of both and the internet t v well i'm i'm kind of hooked on one radio station so it's when that radio station introduces that artist primarily i also have a sixteen year old son so he helps me stay a little etc a lot of different ways friends computers and radio they just put a whole lot of new music that's right  yes i have yeah you know my my space i know i don't use my space why and i don't know i just don't have a my space so i never really go to that site but there's a lot of other sites that i listen to music
believe that you do and i believe that one hundred twenty pages of briefing sets forth all the relevant facts in the dispute of facts we simply highlight the fact that there is a dispute of material fact and that was the issue in the district court on summary judgment is the issue on there are a couple points that i think the court needs to keep in mind when in this case try to say these things diplomatically first there are a variety of claims from a  conclude on those two points ok
lara and i work for the rainforest alliance we are an international conservation nonprofit with local roots and vermont our mission is to conserve biodiversity and ensure sustainable livelihoods by transforming land use practices business practices and consumer behavior whether working locally or globally we believe the best way to keep for standing is by ensuring that it is profitable for businesses and communities to do so that means helping farmers and forest managers realize greater economic benefits by ensuring ecosystems within and around their operations are protected and that their workers are well trained and joy safe conditions proper sanitation health care and housing our richmond vermont office focuses on providing our agriculture forestry and carbon clients with third party auditing services based on the most globally respected sustainability standards on the local level we've worked with the university vermont's jericho research forest and we've certified the marsh billings rockefeller national historic park in woodstock vermont however our stuff is all over the world in africa asia pacific latin america south america it's easy to get involved you can become a member of the rainforest alliance our website or by purchasing one of our rainforest alliance certified products you can find your products at your local co op or market anything from chocolate coffee to tea these products have been certified to meet our rigorous social and environmental standards and are good for people and good for the planet to find out more check out our fall of the frog video you are a good person you spend time with your family you work out a gym you conserve water will shower you like nice clothes thank you to charity so you drive a prius but use your bike when you can you enjoy the occasional distraction at work and you're always in the car on mother's day always but there's a part of you that tells yourself that you're not so good that you could be doing more but the world seems and all you've been doing is yoga one day you see that the rain as it is being destroyed at a staggering rate of thirty two million acres a year that's the equivalent of one football field every seventy eight seconds you feel bad angry guilty you've been apathetic for too long you want to do something about it must  well this is what you're not going to do you're not going to quit your job leave your family get on the next flight to nicaragua take a bus to the edge of the jungle then hope it across rivers lakes and streams on a quest to the very heart of the rain forest taking to the heart of the rain killing off the endangered species that one served as your occupational distraction to finally make it back home only to find you've been replaced at work by a guy named t j and that things at home are not what they used to be you're not going to do any of these things but what you can do is follow  certified products ensures the future of our rainforests so that you don't have to do the things you shouldn't do anyway
an information as a youth to the charge of aggravated sexual abuse that was in april of two thousand and six in that may of two thousand and six seconds in hearing on the youth case he was incarcerated to official detention for a term of sixteen months five years which is a statutory maximum for a youth in this matter i guess the case that i believe the certainly telling in this matter is this circuit me under the proper statute i guess that would have to be determined using the purpose of the federal june of lincoln siac which is rehabilitation and the court in the december fourteenth ruling said that it was plain it was certainly playing sentence could have been different certainly your honor and i think that's because congress has made it clear the courts over and over again have made it clear that we treat us with a different hand in treatment also a it must be clear from the record if not explicit that the district court weighed all of the relevant factors and found that the disposition posed with the least restrictive ways to accomplish the goals of rehabilitation we know that is not clear in this case once again the court went over the thirty five fifty three a factors the court then said pursuant to the sentencing reform act there was no mention explicit of the general joulwan can see act as exactly occurred in this rehabilitation of those you know i can't speak to that your honor the court said hopefully that he does receive that he is incarcerated he is incarcerated in the bureau of prisons and the reason why is because he committed a crime and when he was over the age of eighteen he has been sentenced to be a prison so i don't think that he's getting any type of appropriate rehabilitation i don't think incarceration this individual is appropriate your honor is lori stuck from the district as montana the government has to be candid here we have united states versus juvenile that was decided in december of two thousand and six it couldn't be more on point it's exactly the same judge using argument that i can make here is under plain error you do have to look at the substantial rights of this juvenile and and judge people in this case i understood what he was facing a juvenile who was completely in a circle going nowhere but down but violent crime and he has a long history of other crimes very violent history and really the problem is there's no stability for him at this point outside of the environment that the judge placed him in his abysmal performance on pretrial release when they tried to release him to his family shows the court that but to say that the judge explicitly said rehabilitation is my guiding force and that is what i'm going to use he did
now there is any such thing as a downward departure is an interesting question i don't i think the distinguished counsel and i were talking about this before that when the united states supreme court in gauged and exercise portions of the sentencing guidelines it forgot about some other unintended consequences and i think there's a proper case to argue perhaps than a reasonable sense of an unlawful one and one that you can a feel but since in this case the primary issue is that the judge was a structure that we now know is illegal it should go back for that limited remain on the court can determine whether or not it's reasonable and maybe the school under will come back with arguments about whether or not she can appeal that but i don't think the judge thinks he needs or she needs to do nothing what's the situation can you then come back to us because if the judge doesn't do anything or the other issues that you  no foreclose they may well be they may well be i think the i guess what i'm saying is from a policy viewpoint i think the case that should come up about whether or not downward departures are available or not is the case  it seems to me anyway shouldn't prejudge the government's going to argue that a good morning or others may please the court counsel i really have nothing to add i mean we are very mindful of the court
support this case was the decision in yesterday's decision of the supreme court of murphy versus n c a a underscores the issue that is present here in this case and the happened with this case but what was underscoring here and justice alito of reference the marijuana in several instances and what we're underscoring here is the question does a determination your honor i know that you were on on that panel that made the ruling the what i understood the court to say is that they didn't have subject matter jurisdiction to isn't and then there's this case this is going into far this is going into the statutory construction issue and there are we do have individuals that are present in this case to investigate unlawful drug trafficking and then have the ability to share that information with law enforcement that presuppose to show difficulty so we're what's the constitutional problem with allowing the i r s to make a determination that you're not an idle action bequests because under section two eighty the fil criminal statutes and those inherently suspect criminal activity which is clearly the case here this is this is the purported trafficking of marijuana class one controlled substance potentially is that was not necessary we would we would agree that under governor versus united states there as a potential but what we're talking about here we're not talking about a fifth amendment privilege against a criminal case we're talking about the statutory construction of this law and i'd like to make that very clear what we're looking at here so this is looking forward at what and this is going to the i arrest as powerful and that's that's where we're going before there's a game sixty dollars for constitutional purposes that is the insult for constitutional purposes that forty dollars out of the cost is not a deduction that is allowed by legislati
welcome this is the instructional video for clamp the record it is an easy dance for anyone to learn have fun and join the dance when you first arrive you are going to find a partner and you're going to face each other just like these girls are doing and the first movement is with your hands and you are going to go together clap bright clap last clap together clap then you are going to make a windmill with your arm syrian to do right arm left arm right arm left arm let's do all of that together together clap right clap left clap together clap right arm left arm right arm left arm and you're going to repeat that two times then the next section is with your feet you're going to move to your right syrian go and then you repeated again with your hands and then your feet here we go together clap and i clap the left clap together clap right our left arm right arm left on you're
them and look at that point no longer apparently going to challenge  issues in a way that they haven't done before i would also want to point out to the court in our prefer we talked a little bit about not only  and i don't believe that the camp would have made much of a differen
ok our fourth case for this morning is read against melvin messy so the complaint i'm looking at it seems to say an officer mark a load of with his closed fist keys in fists start to hit my hand on the charcoal door so you portray now and so i take another part of the scenario that you think you know reading the complaint the light favorable to mr reed that this charcoal door is relatively small and that officer ballade is not under any case at this juncture and even if it doesn't if there was a need for force you would look at the hudson versus mcmillan author actors laid out in that case in and in others and you he would look to the need for force the amount of the force whether there were any attempts to  deescalate the situation verbally before the force was applied in the nature of the injury and all those factors cut strongly in favor of mr reid as well as the obvious facts such as the curses and the racial epithets which will obviously be relevant evidence
there's anything like this ever happen in your home in your family when it does what is the usual reaction suppose for instance you were in mary's place what do you think she should do next you just seen one way to meet in everyday situation was it the best way or should marry do this when our father says i marry and i'm afraid the answer has to be that was method number three here's number four watch what mary does this time sorry mary ok and your opinion did mary do right in scene one scene to scene three scene four if so or if not  now are you ready for the next family see here we go watch carefully everything that happens as marion bill and george and their parents finish su brothers bill george's are an entirely different one why next suppose we look at another very familiar family situation this one always takes place late at night young bill is been downtown spending the evening with friends he was supposed to get home around eleven but as you can see it's going on one is almost two hours took on there in a car it wasn't exactly a car it was more like a wagon you have here you're telling the truth you know the price i'm telling the truth teller this family is nobody will believe me that's one way to meet a problem here's another way to learn your bell it's not a a business i'm not a kidney more i'm old enough to take care of myself i live and beginning now that just what i'm going to do now i'd like to see you or anyone else try to now look at possibility number three was my fault tonight and i illustration you've seen several possible ways of meeting typical problems that affect every family group including your own remember what these problems are there are three of them and we'll review them for you briefly in your opinion what should happen when an invitation is received by telephone or otherwise what is a good course of action when it's time to do the family house work what procedure do you recommend when someone comes home late questions like these the kind of have any family suppose we hear what you have to say about them ok you're absolutely right george most family problems can be solved through franken friendly discussion which points the way to  happy family life
i'm talking to you knowing i've flown in all the way from new york to offer your husband a hundred fifty thousand dollars mrs hall you r the west coast in a few months ago and they made me vice president in charge of operations for the whole network and sent me east to new york in radio radio aren't you quaint no tv's live baby now and it's but i know you don't expect me to give it to you out of sentiment course and i'd like to give you one hundred sixty thousand but i know you don't expect me to be guided by sentimental considerations i always say there's no place in business for  plays that's something we need a master sommelier someone to tell the audience about each play its history aesthetics significance and maybe between acts had a little so were doing and then we'll no no no i buy finished i was a play as a matter of fact and if you should change your mind and decide to present or see it is of the words with plays you'd be interested in this one bank you know we have a do present such a series i still have some of the masterpieces i compose when i was taking literature and demagogy anyone could turn in such a flaws when he finished i said i felt it would have been much much better if i had died and shakespeare had written about me to many many good things about yes i know the margins of state and so on but see what about the plane well of course you realize it needs work you but isn't out on at one thirty pm on december twenty sixth the pride of millions barrel of slips beer brewed in nineteen fifty rolled out of the brewery this is an all time record you don't help set this record you in the millions of people the prefer  beer that makes millions agree it has to be find to be this one i think i'm really very anxious to know not only because it's my first play but because i don't mind telling you i'm very anxious to have a produce i i might have worked under two years more i suppose but i can no longer well you know how it is and are straight and give a little take a little and eventually you may be able to make a deal understand same as any other deal horses real estate television rights the book all games give a little take a little understand no i say that when you're trying to make a deal you'll give a little take a little whether it's watches television rights the football games thirty nine week drama series as i understand producer someone with prestige in the field of dramatic art someone to appear on each program and sort of introduced play and tell the audience something about it it's a very important and highly paid job i can't think of anyone to fit the bill here in my left hand and the fountain pen in my right hand and we have a witness who wouldn't be so bad on television herself call that an offer if you like this is all thank you i'm down now thank you my darling although