MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
man guy i had now i was naive kid myself one that was different then i was younger myself that not ready to settle down now i have you back with what the wife and all my jerry good money going to you for money every time you get hold of a or tonight it's wednesday when i'm going to pull oh well if you've got a date with cliff that's a lot more important to forget  a crack at that well what say anything about it but jordan wants to blame me for something i never done i can tell about something he did do you guys on the same thing at that time he said was swiped it never was that tire burned up and he ditched it someplace that when he brought the rig back there were scorch marks under the trailer that's the truth jordan why wouldn't join reported fire because they never tested the tires that's why he was late getting into morgan's point that night oh what about that yard that's right the tire did i change one any more black marks against me so i ditched all because you didn't test your tires and i got to talking in the coffee shop and i was like i was in your hands no i have to charge of the price of the wheel and tire and maybe someone will stand me put me on probation give me another chance if i can work it i don't know cliff you're just like an irresponsible kid and i think you're serious about trying to make good around here and afraid we can't have got about it with the maxim where you're the only line can carry them for me you've got refrigerator trailers if we don't have a license to carry explosives or chemicals i'm sorry i am fred i come to can take the risk i pay five hundred dollars to have those chemicals  that's a lot of money but we can't do it i lose a big rush hard for my truck is ready to be too late there's no use talking about it i'm very sorry be split second timing we can't let it get about freezing point all right have it here at seven thirty shaft it won't be anybody around we can load of right away  here is up to the courts now all right jenny i had a
something in a position like one of those things come from we must be made  i guess you think i'm crazy  that's the most beautiful sight i've seen because i miss california
just it seems to me your arguments a little different here today or maybe more we find that it was in the briefing that you rely on these cases which were which were drug conspiracy cases the jury can believe also but i just wonder here there's no question that hit he had a lease with earl john who turned out to be his mother and he owed his mother twenty one hundred fifty dollars for every month that was covered by the indictment wouldn't be without looking at those terms can you construe the reimbursement he received a reimbursement for the debt that he was incurring
the issues which we brought before your iris is whether or not given the factors all field sobriety test no chemical test and all the consistencies in statement can do with this is testimonies whether or not there is enough evidence to ground on the road the people who would suggest that there were consistent testimony as to the intoxication and there were some inconsistent testimony as to intoxication such as balance you could have keeps bringing up that this is a mental state this is one piece of circumstantial evidence showing intoxication and therefore it would be like if i refused you could infer that i'm perhaps hiding something because i don't want anybody seeing the numbers of that result is not offering i had a mental stage as to driving or drinking before i was driving so otherwise the people stand on the brakes if they're any of the questions
the city may have the police functions of this program the way they are directed tracker they closed off the parade route so there's no question about it and they have people manning the parade route this happens the parades every railroad every time there's some of that if if if that it and that i think would be a police function as well so what we're talking about here fall fairly fall squarely within the dock this entire configuration was approved by the i c c and under back of those proceedings place count players council alexis is right in the complaint if you look at this map to change that in someone who just is it does not exist as a matter of law up but they obviously want to try to impose that duty on  magnitude of their duty consequences so on so if you know i just don't know how i'm going to look at their test and this is a legal task and say that the city has some kind of an obligation to prevent this accident accept for responsibility for anything relating to this particular accident they don't have to do that but they just did it is assumed that they'd have to do  action here on the closing of the east and west adjoining rose sixty three dollars being the only street that was left open traffic was able to go on th street a traffic stop unfortunately we were setting their condition what i've done is just real quickly gone through all their claims of the neighborhood and under four to under the police protection
because this is the first time i see them all together in one piece you really think you'll work it better after all the time we spent on a standby to test rocket the robot is finally completed ca them very accurately that flashing eye of his not only enables him to see where he's going but it automatically photograph and filed everything at sea and he's more powerful than any twenty humans put  together roger is ready to operate right now then by one jet remember roger packed a lot of power i don't anticipate any trouble but if anything should go wrong stay out of his way and that mean handling yes or ok ready just ready for standby roger roger do you hear me  receiving me all right they can do something ok roger raise your right arm right stand up and walk toward me but whatever happens that me handle it and don't antagonize you yes you ok stand by roger roger you are on your o as i told you just roger can operate in places where no human could possibly exist he's built to withstand great extremes and pressure and he isn't affected by intense heat or cold he doesn't require oxygen as we do nor will he be affected by cosmic rays or lack of gravity in other words just roger the robot is the ideal space explorer and if we can materialize into other planets he'll be able to move along the surface while it's photographic i and other recording instruments transmit information to us apart is over a hundred and sixty one million miles but when the senior centers are together on the same side of the phone they're only twenty four and a half billion miles apart only astronomically speaking to twenty four and a half billion miles isn't very far we've got to get him back in the laboratory before we come to the contact with people you know i think he'd be dangerous i don't know maybe not but on the other hand he's still in the experimental stage we don't know exactly what roger might do cr the contrast a federal prison in san francisco bay is on an island sometimes called a rock then i refocused i don't think even roger would want to be there fall entitles you to travel in a crowded spaceship to any planet in our solar system it also contains my official signature and photographs as well as regulations for space travel and procedure for rocket ship blast  follow the man the good luck in time and
under the policy where there is  you know wide stance this is part of the loading of the truck because they're trying to get the calves together now that would be covered with that's a tougher call because that's a loading question and i'm not sure i haven't really thought about that and i'm  and to the common person to understanding of the fast if you were delivering potted plants for example out of the truck and your charges that delivery person was to take them off the back of the truck and deliver them to the loading dock all right if you take  let me explain it as i was just trying to open talking about the the word unloading is defined in the policy if you look at that definition you will we will determine that in this case matter if the cow was finally delivered and if it was finally delivered ok the exclusion doesn't apply but if there was an interruption in the delivery then the exclusion doesn't apply either look at the specific definition of them loading it says handling property in this case handling pals while they are being moved from the trailer to the place of final delivery there's a temporal requirement in there that is not met by the facts in this case in this case this reporter was not injured while the house were being handled this reporter was not injured while these cows were being moved from the trailer to the place of final delivery rather mr porter was injured three to five minutes after these cows  policy in that case had an exclusion for liability arising out of loading around the loading the supreme court of washington described the reason they accepted review in that case two to two and a half feet between them the truth the hanley vs oakley case dealt with the identical issue that was the case where there was an ice cream truck positioned near the third base line at or arguable use of this for a lawyer in the involved in the accident the only arguable use of the trailer was unloading and we have in this only arguable use of the trailer in this case was unloading then we should be limited to determining this case on whether that exclusion applies or hack north pacific shouldn't be able to argue policy was just this covers liability arising out of the use of the vehicle didn't say anything about loading around  loading or it could mean results from loading the companies can't write a policy as they did an adequate excluding liability resulting from loading and unloading that wasn't done with this of this policy question of the judge just before you are about is that a question of fact it may be under certain circumstances in which case that's what you should do to reverse remand for a trial on the issue of what the ledger determined was this final delivered your honor decided that as a rule of law but that was the learning process forty minutes went by before that steere get a card only three to four and everybody's trying to get it to where it was meant to be finally delivered ten reasonable minds differ
boys and their mistake in this particular instance didn't introduce evidence of caller id and so therefore the state you argue was unable to establish  love that that information should be evidence do we know that corroborated that information in the take we know do we not that the police responded to this an address very quickly within minutes and  says that things can be authenticated through circumstantial evidence i'm sure that it has position and what it wanted could never be admissible because in a normal metropolitan area there's no reason to believe the nine one one caller's name the name of the person she was accusing is pretty good because it hired and that there were children in the house each of those things was verified through the testimony of the officers and the the tape would be admissible so we didn't actually get it and did it as a matter of the procedure in the trial if that ended prior just like immediately creature out because there was a significant amount  testified but again this decision was made before the rest of the evidence was presented and it was made outside the presence of the injury and it was made after a significant amount of motions practice then i don't think she talked about the sterling members of the community or protectors of the community or anything like that i think he basically said they're just doing their job and and that being the case it seems to me that while this higher court cas take back to your constituents that you know they were doing their job back i think says what needs to be set they were talking to people they came in to testify they were doing their job i think that's very true
that's what the record shows disposing of the good people with the victim's body that refuted his claim of self defense because she was bludgeoned while she was lying prone on the surveillance tape of the twenty seven which is the morning of the twenty seventh which is people's exhibit twenty five as far as i know he was not shown the exhibit  he does identify the shoes that he had on on the morning of the murder and he says those are the ones that you have in the car but just a visual comparison shows that he's just not  basically the same clothing on the twenty six so i mean those are reasons why he doesn't show any prejudice from the admission of these if you're not i can't remember that was there evidence  surveillance shows that he goes around comes around eight thirty eight pm on the twenty six and what did he say and he i don't know that either time gooden said he had gone there on the evening of the twent court should consider and the the important thing is that the videotape should be shown to be accurate and reliable it was shown to be accurate and reliable in that the defend his clothing and his and here is the like tennis shoes in the same clothing that he wears the next morning when he shows up so no jury can i just buy him if he has someone thinking about  do you believe that merely the fact that those videotapes were minute to minute all the other evidence required reverse right we cannot find your
point sit on my bare butt monitor was the boiling point was this work fine for the first time on appeal but those statements were all and that's exactly the situation that we have t history thing in the record that tells us whether or not the defendant understood the issues you just talked about or didn't understand it as a result of not having these reports of his feel so exposure to prison time the defendant is also going to preserve his theory of the actions or peel now the defendant wants to say and the appeal will issues we believe that he has waited all those issues because he
because i didn't you know he was a group salesman but hang it all homes at least fifty people registered tell that night what made you begin to hampton chaffed because my dear fellow in elementary geographical knowledge of london would tell you that the even numbers  i don't know
shallow end was for the four and a half feet the deep end was six to six and a half feet there was no rope or any other device separating the shallow end from the deep end nor was there anything that test could such as a letter which might indicating that i assume a parent should be watching children in the pool because of this danger of drowning but it did not indicate that the danger of drowning was due to this getting deep into tasting was very adults left and the children as children wanted to have more sway and during this one more swam jacqueline slipped into the deep end of the pool be requires that if you're going to assert insufficient information as your response that's you know if you're going to go for a read would be normally an admission to the to the allegation by specifically deny it you have t all how do we read that we reach these arguments because the as as a race they did in my reply brief the movement as the initial burden obvious the condition of the trial judge indicates that bed he reviewed the exhibits and the pleadings in the case and he reached a conclusion what i'm saying to this court is look at those pleadings look at those depositions and you'll see that that an adult present you can use the pill now ten times question stastny was no i told her that her dad had to be present and so did i think mr protein to testify to that but that is just an issue of fact this is  affidavit had been provided in this case and the reason for that is in reviewing this case and in looking at a cappy of the answer in this case i noticed that there was no affidavit attached to it that's that's absolutely  and i don't believe that there was any of th
machine audio if we're going to hear what's happening ye very god god i hope you got there in time today william tell is still a symbol of the first love of liberty form entitles you to travel in the credit of space ships so any planet in our solar system it also contains my official like my turn photograph as well as regulations for space travel and procedure for a rocket ship blast  good luck in time and space
performance was deficient specifically led force on whether the record shows that he was in custody at the time he made statements the legal standard for custody is whether a reasonable person in that situation would feel free to terminate the encounter the people was meant that that there is a legitimate argument as to why he chose not to file who would that argument be narrow focus on the the interrogation factor of the this analysis as justice schmidt mentioned earlier going about in count one his ruling on count one he says he believed the officers testimony that the defendant was instructed possession of the cocaine because the judge believed the officers testimony that the defendant the just from the judge's statements because the greater charge that's correct and it wasn't that the statement of the judge yes that's one of the state is the just and the other stay when the judge made at that time was which was he you believe that the fun it was
or i don't think it was that two people were there but that there was an attorney present in the station and that according to the assistant state's attorney the sachem came  client all right well the question i think the cops here are some kind of scheme i think the question becomes number one did the police here believe him all right did they do they really kind of you know prevent him from this legal counsel did they prevent him from accessing counsel and so i think that's the kind of thing that we i don't think that every case is just something you just say well this is the you know the formula and it was i learned i mean i think your standard will questions that are tied up to every single case that's all i'm just see suggestion what if the assistant state's attorney had already been there for some time which looks like he was and did he talk to the stupid fool and then the individual read to give his statement out  is a room in interrogation and told that there's somebody here that says they are there your lawyer they want to talk to you is there really any kind of truth axis there yes is it wouldn't it be different if if those lawyers got to see him and said you know we're here to represent you you don't have to say anything and this is something actually i believe that  that oh this is an accountability case and he he immediately sort of takes himself out or he thinks he thinks he's seeking self and relieved when the judge concluded that as providing information about the identity of those lawyers and we have the handy identify tipping ruby where on but to give it to just as hosts point and i think that's exactly what happened in this case that you know there was
and i do think it would be a situation where the container controls the amount of drug delivered the patient controls the amount of trunk delivered if it's an option distance service i think that would be a container that controls the amount of the drug delivered
noticed and the participants and didn't have notice and therefore the public entity would have had an obligation to worn down here into the facts of this case if the current district should have known that the sophistication you're dealing with a twenty two year old playing a game versus the park district in this requirement that it be novel in terms of the maintenance of the product secondly different level of sophistication which would sustain your cause of action as opposed to with a different level of sophistication however this fact or circumstances such into it anybody can see the rough and sure walk into it and we're dealing here with somebody who has been invited permitted the courage to play this kid and it's this case that the park district had taken some measures to keep the game out within the playing field within the lines by including a rule that in order to receive the ball players have to have one foot in bounds and therefore doesn't that show because there were some cases a number which looked at the definition and said ok now you have a course of action that is not on missions i could not get to a course of action you have to have to a conscious decision to do something is no reason for why would there be the opportunity to move to dismiss it the plaintiff in a reason said don't move to six fifteen wait until summary judgment or trial because i didn't choose for discovery first with regard to the supervision went to six nineteen that the jury instruction was modified to reflect the jordanian definition no they read almost word for word together but you won't find the word reckless of net either so actually the argument is through reversal but when it comes to making all the case law for many many years ago the hockey and i start talking about sports we're by contact especially rough on contact is not the goal of the key but is rather incidental to my two i would have a more difficult time explaining through nine because otherwise we have the problem
is to do with the child well their ability to cooperate doesn't mean they cooperate with each other cooperate were guarding the best interests of the child corroded cooperation by definition must be with regard to each other because they have certain decisions to be made on  by virtue of the fact that he would be bounced back and forth the way he was those are the factors that i think the court has to address in determining whether or not after a joint custody i think the court tried to try to get to the right spot she says the court shall not consider the inability of the parents to cooperate effectively in consistency in matters that do not directly affect the joint parenting of the child if we go into records there's instance at the o'fallon police
there's no question
that in this case the appeal basically is based on a letter opinion letter written by a section construction the section sides they did not produce the river march thirty one branches agreement to the arbitrator or two opposing counsel and we didn't find out if they were trying to make this argument that this was really just evidence of course that in addition if you found this or that page
provided by report there was no live medical testimony in the record this court is able to read medical reports he has a pension but the players contrary to the statement contained in the city of department you should apply for disability he then wrote a slip that he shouldn't be here a fire season he did not state you re what the cost of the hearing loss was the strongest opinion is borne exhibit three which be interesting things when you when you read dr nielsen records to see the three opinions of the doctors picked by war no possible motorcycle this particular instance and dr neil said it would be too dangerous because the heat could cause the here a big to melt and if the battery failed when he was in the middle of a fire he would present the noise levels produced by the various witness that was used but he himself had a back injury correctable i surgery he did he chose not to corrected he was i might be for a year and that was granted disability benefits and he testified that was the rule last movie is available for twelve months there is no question that she testified that this is her first time job description i do believe submitted to the city council for approval and the written job description was changed the fire suppression would no longer be part of the job so my  deliberate we have to find a written decision that explains how don't reach your conclusion so we accept winning and how how do you reach the conclusion is not only important under the passion code it's