twelve of the minutes under the issue of the l p r the second paragraph down i think my statement should say mrs merrill said she does not think the problem is that apartment is accessing the data incorrectly that would be the only change i have made if you prove this amended second from the last meeting but i'm going to pass on that i'd like to talk to you later on a warm basis but i would like to bring to your attention some concerns that many people have about this coming year we have an election scheduled for november and that election is going to have a big effect upon the economy and they say in this country whether you vote for a republican or you choose to retain the current  white house home or white house attendant is up to you but regardless of which way you vote we're going to have some tenuous times in the economy next year i just simply like you to consider or do some study research into what this means the selection before you get into the budget process i think it's very important to consider all the president who spoke about the issue was concerned that the building that was being acquired and added to the property could theoretically be used to house that kind of what meant if in fact he decided to do that field the effectiveness of the trust has not been as great as it was in the past and and in fact the trust is currently in the process of changing their model to go into a self insured model to address some of the concerns raised by our of the doubt one of the things that we wanted to do w over towards them given the fees and on the other concerns and that would be far as i suspected that might be a consideration for building as we have done with a number of these type of projects what we'd like to be able to do is to hire an engineer to do the design and take it to a point where we can get a the estimate for the our recommendation that a contract be issued to tower engineering tower and you're you've done work with us before they were the they were the engineers on the recreation center and we had a good experience with them the other thing with inside their proposal there is an architectural component that there's any and they've chosen to partner with russia on her starting which is the architect we use for the library the police station as well as the entrance to this building and again our experience with with that firm was a was a positive one all three firms have projects that is sitting out there is the replacement of the emergency generator in this building and when it became obvious that the that the firms that responding to this request for proposals all had the capability of also doing that type of design work we thought it might be prudent to in fact incorporate that into this work and part of the reason is  can be more complicated than you might think because when it's moving they'll be a new transfer switch in addition to the hat the existing cable marx's were were not designed to accommodate this so i think you're looking at a fair amount of work dollars actually thirteen thousand dollars or so much or i know this is for design work in what what one of the possibilities here is these systems can be designed to work in conjunction with the well worth what he will whoever the engineer is is responsible for looking at three different alternatives in terms of how you design the system so i'm going to go in and look at different ways to accomplish the same thing and figure out which is the most cost effective the reason why i make the comment that i do is one of the things i got from you know our sense from our engineering in from eccles it is that they were more willing to look at a variety of alternatives and paragraph you talk about the budget for the project and you talk about it being to seventy nine with twenty five thousand for design now you might work where my mass and the disconnect because twenty five thousand  and mean every one of these is twice or three times and the problem is we threw that number him in or it was a wild guess and what what the cost of this would be in the in the reality is that that number of words were too over and that it's going to cost more to design the system than they are not hard to to construct the system and they asked well i'm glad you brought that up because i was a little confused about the absence of any reference only intention is that when we talked about other alternatives mechanical contracting companies can do design their own engineering which normally is a better suited approach to an existing building and we've gone into the whole engineering side and now we're going to end up with a mechanical engineer again so i am i'm a little i'm not i'm shocked by the numbers now and the fact that we're going to be paying on top of that and it's go once you get in the building and start ripping things out i think that's somewhere where a mechanic going contractor might be able to handle something differently but emotions been made so consolidation subdivision also ask for the swap but i'm one of the conditions that was originally on it at the time of the planning commission approval because it was penned occupancy for highway occupancy permit needed for the site plan would be a condition of the approval of this i'm asking that that condition be removed because that condition is also sitting on the site plant the site plan has been approved as you know by your planning commission and so that condition of h o p e is more appropriately a site plan an issue that is a subdivision issue the reason it's important to us is that the forest lawn people are interested in closing right away the highway occupancy permit is probably another six eight weeks away before it's all proved and so our construction for the site itself is totally on hold until we have that h o p e but this would allow the land to be consolidated in the properties to be swapped so removing that that condition of the approval be removed that how long would it take t mean the radius is so that's why we needed it on the other when we moved it ten feet away from where currently is because there's an inlet out there in the street so we've had initial conversations with them it's going to go smoothly but it isn't going to go time can i just clarify this is primarily so that you can transfer the property yet you will still be on hold for any construction agent p absolutely count three theoretically this is to just conclude the deal to the president and the other officer was you know their day they feel that the metal spikes are important for them and you know that there's three different sizes of spikes on the three eights there's a many meetings either and they are there same night second monday as the council meetings i'm not sure that a change on the basis of attending one meeting is something that i would necessarily want to champion and i believe that based on what i read in the minute someone i've understood is they who power over long they talk about things things move forward i think they're very deliberate about what they consider and as representatives i think they do a good job and they try to be very conscientious about their fiduciary responsibility so i would i'm surprised on the basis of attending one meeting that god i mean i don't i don't think we want to jump into th percent reduction congratulations could i ask when we figured in taking over the bar and did you project any costs for staff involvement no we didn't but we do have engineering fees from