that's received from the purple computers and i'd like you to address that because i've read or seen that talks about analyzing the traffic it isn't just receiving the conclusion from the report computers it's receiving contain the raw data that was received by the distributed notes there but they do include summaries of the world data so that you can determine trends and things like that that's all it says we don't know what's what the nature of the fair point but the question is whether it has to be that what data or whether summaries of the raw data or within the plenty right that does get us back to the claim construction issue and not just on the question of what horace discloses i think it's significant it front question whether what sent from the distributed modules of the network whether they have to include raw data or simply whether the summaries would be sufficient and i don't want to repeat myself too much i've made my points about the claim language itself i would like to to the specification then with reliance by the board and again by i b m and traffic impacts their findings on to the data collection and processing center or other central processing system and so on in the board and i b m it went to that to say well look the specification discloses that the sensors ask findings and therefore that's within the scope think it's explaining what's going on with the sensors that are described in and seven and all all that's happening is that the data collected and otherwise received at the data collection processing center and so the sensors have sent the data to the data collection a processing center shown in figure five it's there's nothing in the claims to say that the censors can't make independent findings they're open and it claims  specification as a whole is consistent that what's happening it's never traffic itself before due to the data collection and processing center except for that column seven line forty five and i take it i guess my recollection tell me if i'm wrong that what you say about that conclude that the language you claim analyze the data cannot under any reasonable ordinary language understanding include indirect analysis of the data being given information data as i said before if because we are right about the claim construction for this term we should prevail in the i b m appeal because there's no dispute at least race and or even here in the spiel that the porch reference alice's of the data that's entering the network it simply says that the data collection and processing center analyzes the data and during the network so whether it does it directly or whether does it indirectly via not that level of compliance hooey a statement that gets forwarded it's much more information than that hundred four hours that they get information about craft patterns and things like that in other words there's a lot on they're called activity reports so it's reports i'm out the activity there now is this result anomaly reports this is all described by poor us as being within the reports and then sent up to the enterprise monitor right so it doesn't in porus go through the details of what would be exactly in the report but these are reports that are analyzing the activity from the t c p ip packets and so it's feelings like sure that the source where it came from and the destination where it went to so if if for instance if there was a virus being sent to a particular no really really in two separate types of limitations in the claimed twenty six it's both how the data is analyzed and they use the language in their briefing that it must be analyzed first hand or must be directly neither of those terms are in the claim language and then there's also separately from that the notion of what is being analyzed in there is where i would be argues in must be the raw data that's being analyzed the data packets or in their appeal briefing they start using the terminology the network traffic that must be analyzed both of these limitations that they're reading into claim twenty six aren't present in the claim language itself and so you get to the threshold issue of if claim point six does not require direct analysis of the data then regardless of whether it's data packets the t c p ip packets that's entering the network or whether it's reports under either case you have analysis of the data and that's what's  what i ve tries to argue because the plain claim language of claim twenty six doesn't support their interpretation they then turn to the specification and you heard the argument that the specification disclos s allegedly a specific embodiment that is unclean that is incorrect for two separate reasons one is that the claim language doesn't actually claim the alleged in body mind that president mentioned and so even this notion that there's separate environments and it's only claiming one embodiment that's just not supported by the other we also heard from my be an argument  that the prosecution history supports reading in these elements into the claims and i agree with commerces counsel earlier the record in this case doesn't support that the prosecution history demands that these elements be read in as an initial matter claim twenty six which is the claim and issue in this appeal isn't amended in that piece of file history and then the discussion about the row in reference doesn't actually support that there are things that it must analyze data directly or first hand that history and how it doesn't support reading in these elements to the address the notion that if you do decide to read into the claim twenty six these elements of the should be read and but that i ve has said that the the earlier claims but it's not the exact same language still if you look at the comments appendix ten sixty three there's no notion in those in that description there that what is being amended there intellectual ventures before the board they had a winning position and they haven't contested that in their brief here i think if we look at the final written decision it's significant that the board didn't for example make any findings about what's contained in the