sander came from twenty three specifically rejecting her findings that he enters would have severe limitations and withstanding routine work and stress and adapting to changes  examination and her personal observation her valuations in both cases were ordered because of the lack of medical evidence in the record regarding mental limitations for mr peters findings were guarding those specific elements he indicated in his decision that history and the claimant's refusal to follow through with treatment recommendations l j never really did not analyze and i guess the question is on what basis the administrative law judge determining normal mental status examination as opposed to a medical expert who had the mental status examination and the observation to make this assessment the lack of specialized treatment black improvement history and the claimants refusal to follow through the record is clear in this case to some extent it's not real clear overall p not treat although i know that record page four hundred and five says august of two thousand and fourteen he had little or no insurance january th of two thousand and eighteen during the testimony he admitted that he had badger care in february of two thousand and sixteen he indicated that he was refusing medication because he had tried many of them and did not and they did not agree with him judge's interpretation of the record and based upon a lack of inquiry by the administrative law judge as to why he was not present and why he was not taking medication simply insufficient for this not differentiate between them he did not indicate any limitations or any parts that he did not agree with their opinions indicated a broad range yes all three of accordingly so even if the judge properly gave the weight to these three state agency doctors he didn't a calmer or address specific issues that were necessary pursu the broad opinions from the consulting examiner dr king in addition to the medical opinions the algae considered that mr peters was able to work at a higher skill level in the past when he ran an expedited company with the same on standing mental impairment and l j explained that even though mr peters was not engaged in any specialized mental health treatment like counseling or taking prescription medicine his mental status examination for a large normal mr peters has not severe difficulties when in january twenty four to she only said moderate and if you look in compare the two reports they're almost identical and in fact he's performed slightly better on the and measures of concentration in terms of the fact that he was able to spell the word world properly forwards and backwards so in this case a elders reasons for not adopting a nd opinion which as i supported and explain functional capacity form intent on the disability determination explanation and applied them he just didn't explain or provide any of the other limitations that different between the doctors provide any explanation for them did not provide any indication of why they were or were not adopted and just asylum the issue of substantial evidence is not one of whether it's good enough it requires some level of articulation to clearly evidence that the judge consider all sectors and rendered a sufficient decision in this case there is no explanation and the court has left should be left to wonder why in the specific limitations are excluded and moreover we have all three of these state agency opinions were based almost entirely on the record from dr king as there was only two in trees involving mental health during this period of time from mr peterson's treatment so most of these opinions are doing nothing more than relying on dr king's assessment yet the a ministry of law judge can pick and choose and decide that one set of limitations based on her experience and knowledge can be eliminated and to do so with her for reasons if the judge failed to properly articulate what we're talking about in these mental claims not that the mental illness in and of itself is disabling the issue is whether these specific mental problems in conjunction with his sins of all problems would result ultimately in the erosion of the occupation base for finding a disability these are nuances in many cases and are required and require some level of building a puzzle to show the picture of the