MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
at all in connection with any x rays taken on behalf of georgetown in terms of fundraising recruiting instead the record indicates that dr custer was engaged in these statements made the statement since the passage is a volunteer for the foundation which had no connection which any national university may have with the state of pennsylvania are inadequate to establish general per principal has the right to control the manner in magic of the work it's done by the alleged agent applying this test in this case the question is whether georgetown over here on the scene had the road to con occasionally or sporadically but with a measure of permanence and continuity this requirement means that effectively the corporation of one corporation is taking up residence in this state here or there will facts to reversed a lower court and finally personal jurisdiction does not exist over washington d c based georgetown thank you yourself now and we meet again that his conduct was motivated least in part by a purpose to further the objective of georgetown use required under the faculty handbook to engage in these kinds of because that's how he always identifies himself that's how george tom identifies him on the georgetown the official website he was such a common it guy or at georgetown it's this is not some guy off the street who's got a piece against my client this is going to meet head guys are in this field so that's why i care so much weight my client lost his job it's been a complete nightmare and for them to say we're all this is a some sort of problem detour by some guy we don't really know they know him he's the head of the section and the here understood there are but but at least at this stage i think that's a question of fact because they understood he that he was acting not only on behalf of georgetown but also he also to achieve some of the expected to belong to and participate in the affairs all the employment professional education associations in their respective fields you can't get any more important in this field than this this organization and academic activities this is they have targeted chicago as it is a base of operations to routinely come come in visit illinois champaign chicago the they encourage recruiting activity fundraising activities they specifically state on their website how important a club city club is condo they have an employee whose parents are full time address is is in illinois so this is  this guy falsified his credentials and i'm going to get you to withdraw your war which happens in a very public way it goes on your website it goes out t participant in the most important organizations in your field which is exactly what he was doing and his faculty reviews in as we pointed out in the faculty handbook his faculty reviews are depende dispute that like every national university or it requires service and
wait play in the mom friend of the patient after she was destroyed the most important date that we have it is chartist september first september first is the day care should have been checked he was supposed to see her on the eighteenth and didn't know he saw her for the first time on august twenty sixth we're talking now almost twenty six days twenty seven days after her initial  what's going on the patient can look fine clinically have a point was that what there was no no testimony of outward signs of problems by the doctor
that the high tech was on notice september thirteenth and you know the solution for consideration which is inappropriate in the sixty days because they're supposed to be no further proceedings in their district corps while they
attorney misled the split was a voluntary he chooses to make this challenge despite the fact that he risks being out walking for a time if he should have to go to trial and this petition with the actually make no sense if he had took those actions i was considering their real conviction should he go to trial would be another the only reason blue for step can be drawn from the fact that he filed his petition on to these circumstances is know should be able to proceed to trial that would be successful but we need to know is is an arguable that there is there was a constitutional error here at the first stage and then the second stage of the point of the counsel he if he doesn't allege prejudice however he's in a position like this guy that's where he could have gotten a lot more time if he got lost after a trial i think that  told him if you go to trial your sentence will be considerably higher his use clearly appears to be you did not tell me you did not add up the total for me of what my maximum sentence could it's the people disagree with defense counsel that you can just reasonably infer that from his speech and because there are plenty of defendants who are not going to have a that was not sufficient and even in the he's three times in his petition page thirteen of his petition in conjunction with counsel's false statements of being prosecuted on all of the charges put pressure on the defendant to except it didn't say that he felt his attorney h however if you move throughout the petition to defend uses the word prosecute he uses the word charge he uses the word convicted and uses the word sentence and he uses them appropriately throughout his petition so he does not use them interchange we all would like more information about what happened from him he still has not given more than a fair allegation i would have rejected this plea he also had a previous plea offer but he talks about an institution that was three four years so he knew coming in getting twenty seven years he was getting the last that the admission plea offer so there's just nothing in this petition even liberally constru that he didn't understand he would receive a much higher sentence from his attorney statements you go to trial and it's you're going to get a higher sentence he just he doesn't say the attorney told him i get one hundred twenty years he
women actions that we just mentioned is surrounded by significant amount of evidence which is the part of the testimony during the positions e mails and the sequence of events and even the time frame and supports  letters and discipline before the arrival on the scene out of the man who mr lopez him she claims is the is the person who  is that is that your client was delivering and satisfactory performance before the arrival of the person whose whose right ups are deemed to have been motivated by by no reason why they should question her about documents showing poor performance before the arrival of the slope that's because that that's very helpful to your adversary so why should you read serry make an issue of it on your adver sary has to do is to say she had pro performance before mr lopez arrived and this is and it's separate question as to whether you can connect anything mr lopez did to race but you certainly can't connect anything that happened before the point i was trying to make were going prior incidents is that they wouldn't michael i did not have an opportunity to address them wash was employed because she didn't she was not aware of them except maybe one or two so a lot of things were actually submitted put in a file  grand tender became the highest position employee have responses immediately after he became the maid to the employee room of employees majority one of them a black and he specifically said that he wants to get rid of them and before whatever action was taken against her that would a just be a stray remark and b that would be time barred in some way that couldn't be evidence as to his motivation for whatever he did well  no admissible evidence of it when you move on to some of the other things that your adversary said for example he said that mr lopez  how many words terminated or removed with the traffic with regards to the complaints we disagree that these are not protected complaint she specifically and i quote complained about discrimination she specifically
let me ask a question if if the telecommunications people wanted to lay a cable down there right away in order to bring the internet for example to the country of the right position real estate in practically all real estate is by getting marketable title but your argument is we don't need to go to the last record title the one who had the right to possession of record the to have to be able to resolve those issues between the people that are playing the problem it doesn't make any difference whether it's personal property or real property the issue is the on why your clients who have no deed to whose deed specifically excludes it would then come onto this property that has a tank that has these signs you've just talked about that has a publication would go on to property that someone else is claiming is there and that their deeds specifically excludes i'm still having trouble wrapping my head around that just from
discretion standard doesn't do me any favors i do believe that is the standard we are here to work as it is a child support worker that we're dealing here mr leader stated that should be to know as he is arguing about whether or not wrongful death is but i couldn't find it i would ask you to tell me where did the fifteen thousand that number come from your honor honestly i'm not sure because it wasn't it wasn't really calculated out to seem like it was a well if we think it should be either higher or lower is sugar in this how are we supposed to know whether it should be higher or lower i don't know that there is enough of a calculation in there to decide it seems like the judge just picked a number of he thought was fair which i assume under  and income but a substantial change in circumstances does not necessarily have to be considered income change and i would like you to address that as as you were planning to while you are in  position conflict with the concept that one's ability to pay is not necessarily related to the concept of the income that one can have a different ability to pay based on something that is not by the whether the winning the lottery or whether it be worse compensation or i think a lot of those cases now the one outlier that we have here is what i addressed i have seen cases where this is happening strictly inheritance in the wor was a statutory wrongful death it's still a cost baksh and more damage than that is correct your honor i guess the only difference i can say is what i've stated to the poor is that i do see a little difference  so the damages under the wrongful death act include his lost wages but they include grief suffering loss of society  know of that asked that was determined by statutory descriptors and so how else would he get here if anything if you didn't determine a value based on these release did not or did did or did not contain allocations for various things the twenty percent you argue for is basically scared cory it's in the guidelines and is dependent on the income per se and since the proper house required and since the proceeds th he received were on the basis not of the personal wintery do you know of a business transaction or a sale of a commodity or anything but because of his status why would it not be more reasonable for the court to have taken the position to do that which is this was not income to you because it was derived from your status however it change of circumstance and i know the circumstance and it therefore affects your ability to pay and you're going to pay this amount of the proceeds you got because of your status book i just w him is to figure out a rationale for the actions either affirming or reversing and i'm on my questions really aimed at the type of rationale we should think about and pursue i think you need to look at the rogers me and so that's what some of you're saying that even if we did decide to follow the bill in the way of a case and say it was dying and he still does start to get that benefit because he was unable to show them the distinction
hello hello is this union pacific and i want to make a reservation only you can continental fly or leaving tonight a channel like that holden's flagstaff is the nearest station well that'll be all right the name is natalie brant yes yes that's right thank you i would you mind telling me what this is all about you meet anybody on the road today know your three days oh man always said shoot first not question that it's what brings you that that shiloh was deserted and i was just poking around looking for gold right i guess it's time to go for the  i never bluff  this man what are you doing here i going to answer that all in one breath came to me is the name of that means anything to you i suppose your daughter and i might have guessed there was only one man in the west with nerve enough to do what you've done have the slightest idea what you're talking about you made so many mistakes it's one of the team in heaven but on your neck long ago maybe they're not as clever as you are maybe that's the reason i haven't been able to put a finger on the all the years i've been operating any other reasons you'd like have if we get together on a deal you'll find out how it's done a few in the next day or so there's a big shipment of currency going to new york and the plane will pass close by here you call your boys and it that's true don't you think we can finish a five business pretty quick now there's a plane coming over this afternoon i dare using your radium rate of drop until there were women and children on the first plane that crashed told me there were only the pilots but they had parachutes why the young ladies had a little too much excitement she ought to rest now you go through with our program get that thing working and everything will be all right i don't have another just one to make now you're talking sense you come with me the plane coming over waiting for you to take a look at this it's really quite interesting
to be sworn in a
driving wait a minute i'll take a look at  to is the kind of justice we get the only time the courts get virtuous is when a fellow like jim mitchell goes off on a spree and wings in india in the spirit of fun and they give him five years for that  no money there looks like she's her goal gap is the place for a girl like her to be stranded in some girls can take care of them she's the kind that needs to be taken care of duran over at the jail wants to have a little talk with you that's why i thought you might kind of adopt it that's not my idea of being a mother and i would be reasonable i didn't mean to adopt legally just going to be putting up all the money come to me and our i'll take care of him north gate he has to guard their fix to their horses waiting on the other side of  yeah i know she's cut out of the find a piece of cloth and the rest of it that's what you mean isn't it i guess that about sums it all up hi dan what is it what do you want me to do i want you to get the sheriff and bring him here now ben three years what are you going to do and i don't get where it looks like i'm going to have to let you in on a little secret it wasn't because they were so aggravated about him you can go see they had every reason to believe that he knew a lot about the stagecoach robbers for the last three or four years but they couldn't prove it on so they'd figured they'd arrest him for the shooting and get him to talk anyway i can't think of a better one we'll try it out you better get going then tempted liable to get a notion to marry a brand scum and we've got to i go jingles doggone funny to me i'm going to take a look the feeling that we're getting ready for a bump it cleared up a lot of things that were puzzling i always thought it was funny he confessed so easy and let him send them off to prison and it was fishy to have been in that closet when stella shoved in with tom you've got to eliminate him complete and permanent it here hold the horses i'll go back and get it what's the meaning of all the it means that i'm going to rig up a wedding for you but not for logic seems like a practical joke doesn't it with a real laugh on me
we can assume we should assume that general those hills were was appropriate but that doesn't address the specific question of the course and that is whether or not that order was the star whether it was total or general  decision to take the action and what he was thinking about under holding not only did supreme court literally address the holding it says how to implement the holding and what it said it him or you know boy security which so he is focusing attention on this contractor and then it was this is not soccer and because there's not that disconnect how can we keep the rangers out of our jobs how about fans there was an ongoing problem that was being worked out at the time of nine eleven the court decided to deny under circumstances i believe under two to six decision the
where men and women could indeed be be be om placed
tree crashing down deliberately set to kill you you run into a to be like one of the family
section four controls this more specific than section three it seems to me that you have a problem with section four because as you mention it deals with loathing and what it's saying is that whoever  seventy two or in the early seventies it stretches from the eastern part of the property and winterbottom road and went to the eastern bloc you've got you've got some evidence we right that said the fans existed which we no space coolies intended only get the litigation to show the difference between the merits of the survey and the possible serve once you agree on the more so have you taken that out of contention gone the other way chair in the eastern part of the station they go the
fiction that was a damn and in that case the court noted that the practical value of the ability to remove materials to make that made the dam was useless because they have to be placed upon properties based upon an easement and your company will close towers and then for some reason the public utility one rope to refuse to pay oh would it be your position that you would second tier subcontractors would have no leverage the issue is there was a chain contracting between g s she was the developer there the owners knowingly permitted to enter into that contract by virtue these are agreed that creates the first great thank you so much any time on three months notice however has the obligation to also remove the entire piece of machinery from the property within one hundred eighty days of the terminations down to four feet below grade level and in the four feet has to be covered the soil so that it can be used as even after the term addition of the lease agreement the electrical system stays in the walls the floor who stays with the building and of all the support for the crane stays with that build as well it improves the value of the property for the feet even after the if you describe it as wonderful but it wasn't wonderful to the boss the only thing the bosses received was the monetary benefit if it had been completed was seventy five hundred dollars per year they did not put their
but that was the reason why i believe believe that the meeting place was because he went to the fire station and i think we're here to listen to the evidence and error in taking that evidence and using it for that purpose because it wasn't
tried to adopt as far as i can tell what might be ascribed as a normal common sense practical interpretation of what these terms really were intended to do that's what it  if you look at column three lines they mean through twenty three you've got to be it's pretty clear indications from its fans a structure and the location of that structure right
the medical records foundation which are and there was no other option to their methods they should have been allowed to be sure the jury we should have been allowed to cross examine the expert with those  that that is completely wrong number one i recall they never claimed it was substantially the same procedure done so she found  and as an expert witness he was required to do that he never disclosed appropriate opinions about from the truth as it were to ms it relates to the causation issue just not in there you can look at the disclosure sister but for all your patients in the state of war who the law requires that there be a procedure that is documented and dissed and discussed with the patient in written form and the patient s
baby syndrome from the the instrument as i understand the make correct me if i'm wrong he he was charged with aggravated battery of a child alleging he  evidence of brain damage this is damaged to the gray matter as opposed to a broken bone which is a skull so i'm still having a tough time understanding why we're all into this shaken baby syndrome stuff is that he tripped over the back seats seat and that baby christian hit his head on the coffee table it was a hypothetical that fence counsel used a reason that i represented the case the girl article to this court is because it basically says why i believe to be the case is that there is a very small  baby syndrome and that shortfall can cause that they're a very small group and to say that this is the case and this is what we need to remember source for example the american pediatric article that we are opening greve an unbiased source insisting that anyone who treats children basically percentage of the men whole community to the to post conviction vision or through it to a jury and that is what i believe to be the case which is that there is only a very she's a law professor the other articles cited by the finnish one has a zero author of who are all one of them is a doctor but basically we're we're talking about lawyers telling us about this and i don't think you can say because really this is what it comes down to the defense not saying just that he should have gotten an of the doctors in this case revealed that he had carefully read their reports that he had done a lot of research on not just the why thing of shaken baby you don't have to have an expert if you can accomplish the same thing through cross examination and it is and it is sometimes better to try said i'm looking at the order that was entered october twenty second and all the court deals with the issue of the failure to ask very lesser included instruction was trial strategy  establish the weaknesses of the state's case rather than hiring an expert and again i go back to the fact that the defendant didn't just lie police he lie these two mother he
outside third party discovery and get the names and addresses of everybody who completed the transaction at the body shop for this period of time it's the standard practice in the industry considering the three standing in federal courts we decided that there was significant risk in that would be better to refile this call to action and the settlement to the state were based on that's required here due process is is simply over on reasonable standard under all facts or circumstances as to whether the notice provided class members of the opportunity to be heard down and we have  over twenty thousand claims from non t v program members that were submitted in response to the notice as well as the twenty nine opt outs and five generations updated just in a notice provided there that the case of been dismissed in new york and refile with the same so that had been for the final approval hearing the same so present is when my transactions over this period of may months were these receipts were being printed in that fashion so there are three point six million numbers of the  the first thing i want to say is there is a difference between this case and between verses radio share and the difference is that in the business radio shack the company is teetering money age bankruptcy in this case i