continuing relationship with the children the court may not grant a veto to the bound cunt custodial parent whatever they oppose the move the facts in this case your honour's  clearly show that this move was in the best interests of racial ship the family income was going to be increased by thirty eight percent she was going back to her hometown where she had grown up were her relatives were life of these four children and about it by taking this job they were this family was going to receive four times more money than that then the father was painted child support and that brings me to this point the factors of the college judge looked at this case against a move forward largely issues that were totally within the core control father he chose to be employed merely as a crew member i have the testimony outlined in the brief he was asked under cos if he had if he could use a car any time he wanted to it's a yes so we believe that the court failed to recognize that and then considered a reasonable visitation period during the summer time to lay the visitation period during the summer back to offset the adjustment that has to be made when a patrol are asked to leave the state always age corporation makes a good living i don't know i simply have suggested that perhaps working as a secretary full time as a secretary it would be difficult for her to take on a mother a husband with a new job and two children and i think that's wh judge benson saying it was a way of looking at all these factors deciding putting that happen is evidence of this one evidence of that one you folks are simply woefully unprepared to make the swoop you haven't convinced you that this is in the best interests of the minor children and then you do have a relationship between mr jackson's children she's a very very very close one i will feel being in this case for the past couple years that that's something that a summer but the problem is although he is free to use that car and weekends to go pick up the child he is not really use that car for summer trips so want so for other that we can because it's her car so him suggesting to this court that he would have free reign of the automobile i think is is is wrong because then his odds as left without a car so you know it's just simply apparent that mr close here one final comment here are your justices they were not very comfortable man in terms of wealth what i mean is the children are in schools they enjoy the mother why ask the mother wicked as a whole does not sustain the arguments made but by counsel the totality of the record shows that this was her home town this is where the father and the mother had actually access when i will be able the father he at the testimony was very clear that he had used that automobile of the science to take the children to chicago in taking the children in that car to st louis in taking the children in that car to on a holiday to six flags in missouri so he he's merely being asked to go a little bit further half the halfway point between newcastle and clinton illinois the when i was growing up when i displeased my mother my dad used to say to me you were mother says because if mom's happy the family's happy and i think that that's what this case comes down to the mother by making them put the rachel in a making it a higher standard of proof prove that it's in the best interests of the children that and that's what the party decision says you cannot do that and that's what i believe judge fence and did in this case he granted the for the non custodial father veto that was legal there and it should be