yes we'd be looking at the other two are procedures by which it's usually determined being that you either as conducted a diligent unsuccessful job search or that due to his age experience training education addition there is no evidence that suggests that any of that job search is not credible the responded has not presented any evidence that suggests there were more jobs available in this area that could have or should have individual job search was just calling her former employer and saying hey can you hire me now call back in a couple quality of the jobs diligence associates the job search ask the taking in context o the petitioner had been offered assistance with professional rehabilitation and offered assistance with john search services i've responded then never material this woman by the name of stephanie powers contacted him  been selected to help you with this process to attempt to help you find alternate employment why don't you go ahead and give me some basic information and then she never contacted you truly e do nothing that is also correct but again i believe that the context of why there was that delay is important for the vast majority of that year and a half he was still receiving benefits from the corp they were aware that he could not work i don't cannot return to being an electrician you cannot handle weights that are involved cannot handle the physical demands it terms of zisha ning and maneuvering then that is the vast majority so here again we do acknowledge that he had a period of in this case all of that evidence was presented in dispute there was no indication that despite being his age he ought to be able to move into another line there was no actual evidence given that any of his skills were transferable all of those allegations have been made on support he also testified that because of the nature of the injury to his neck and his dominant left hand he has problems with chord engine he has problems with strength which he testified specifically directly interferes which is used people working as do the f c c as does the opinion of dr all right however the work that he is capable of doing does not translate into a regular and continuous  and again i believe that in this case where there's been no indication that by way of evidence that the job search was inhibited it did not represent all effort on his part with regard to his cheer grackle location with regard to the fact that for a large period of that time when he was unemployed he was expecting insistence from vocational rehabilitation that that never manifested making do with what he had access to there's no indication that he could have done any better than what  as they can see that there is no medical evidence to show a disability so in order to get that i have that we are stemming from whether he had a diligent but unsuccessful job search there is no dispute that he did do a job search but it was not diligent they would like us to be able to ignore the fact that diligent is a requirement in order to switch them and to say any job search is warranted in order to then make the employer have to show that there could have i believe that i see the issue differently than yourself your honor if you understand the concern that you're raising but i believe that in order to end it your conclusion that requires that we accept that it has to be presented by