because we don't even know about a potential claim for two years so our prejudices that we can get examination with two years they go through the issue of data disabled where they have to prove that it was disabled within two years of age of last exposure so it's sort of a two problem problem that we have and were not given notice but the petitioner decides when the application is filed and sometimes it's filed two years sometimes two and a half sometimes before the three sensually the same as soon as practicable here is his is what it is he says if you believe his testimony knew he was having significant breathing problems for many years and the first time we did notice of this is two years this case i'm not aware of any law or case that says that you have to file it within the data to get report from your examining doctor applies to know this about a quiet statue of limitations if you get a timely file for night or he should not return for purposes of we all agreed on that but in this case that's not why he stopped working if he if he stopped working because of previous problems with this mess never had any treatment for breaking problems that's why work has a whole lot of  it probably was a different from the commission but here we have identical facts and  say i just want to work with morrison because i don't want to leave my horses and i'm sorry yes that's news new and i'm not going down to kentucky why does a guy sign up on account what happens is when there's a layoff a couple hundred guys in a room they're getting all this information more basic does it make a difference what difference does that make i don't think it should be if you look a guy who is a coal miner and he's got a cough of some kind he decides in the given day functional parent everywhere you see the watch white spot in the in the actually where there's a far there is an affirmative function you're on also he says you can't go back also he said if you have a diagnose it anytime in your life you probably  well that's what that's what the company wants to say i don't think that's a lie don't think it should be the law don't think that's the way the commission looks at it it is a curse to me that should be looked at in the same way on all of the looks of the discovery number one you know just layman's knowledge of the i'm going to charge the breathy i could have a problem yeah i'm not going to go back to call mining i'm to get my exam then he gets it exam finds out he's got it i've got a claim you know what a flash of the mouth everything's in there that's  there yes to be noticed as soon as practical after the date of the serial number two if there is no notice as soon as practical then the burden shifts to the employer to prove blacklock everybody start to get short of breath as they get older but you have to tie all those things together a happy couple with an occupation disease and that has a standard to test the rigors of the commission analysis and they have to agree with you beatings for money and sex and battery by a seven foot psychopathic resident but i'm fine with all this case come down to is a series of simple manifest weight questions and when you look at him w that the problem with with the the notice argument and the filing the application within a month or two of the x rays there's so they know when they file the application we're going to blame this if you don't give any notice in the first place that's the white case and that's the same thing here they didn't give us anything goes this gentleman reading palms if you believe his testimony for many many hears they all know it could be related