two nine two all these cases are consolidated for oral argument for hairs on motion granted statement or argument in both of these cases it's my understanding that we have more than one council at least the one where one of the parties got to come to divide their town and keep track of that council for i would not go that far there are because i think it's still goes back to my argument earlier of the factual scenario if a temporary guardian you just go and interim order that would be enough to  kouzmanoff is an eighty three year old widow she's not previously determined to be disabled she's not previously been a we do need guardian for her she has two adult children carole easterly who lives in illinois and her son michael three twenty fifteen where she is appalling on her daughter at which time she asked her son michael and his wife linda to move her to texas in orbit she can live with that and in march twenty fifteen that's what they mom moves with their assistants to a residential care facility in san augustine county texas and she moved her son's two accounts to bank accounts they were in texas as well this is who smile was not kidnapped she was not held against her will in texas she wanted to live there she meant to live there and she has good reason to see to reside with her leave the residential care assistance while she lived in other things during this case miss is who smiles additional big brother seems even from the distance where she live in texas left her with the believe she would not approve bail irrespective of the strength  stated it's believed that this is who smile was not even the person who motivated the actions in texas we believe that progressive done that and the joining me repeated references to the lack of cooperation by from the texas court from the judge there and he stated that he didn't need to consider the motion because he had no basis to determine how texas came to its conclusion now the cooperation with or in the other state or how or another state w function and her capabilities we have filed a motion for directed finding and the company memorandum was fully set for than there was an insufficient evaluation performed by the doctor simply the court disregard that the record shows that there were many references to this motion for directed binding the judge indicating i'm going to get to it i'm going to get to it and then he starts he finishes up with the capacity or her functional abilities to get around her disability be a physical or otherwise she can be completely physically disabled and in a wheelchair and in fact she is not completely physically disabled monies that were taken by mr forget prior to the time that his mother was taken to texas and i want to just address a couple things that mr mccarthy said in his argument he said to you that mrs  she was deposited and a nursing home than texas and at that point she believed it was her job because of the long history of taking care of her mother to file for guardianship and to file for to freeze those m she can't remember if she took her medication she can remember if she made herself so ill there is evidence in this record business laid him on make reasonable decisions about the care of her person and communicate them in illinois at least take a first look at the issues raised in the motion progress by what about the issue of waiver well it would have to be demonstrated that she knowingly waive the shooting only want to draw the attention to the fact that that's one page screen to this use to determine if somebody has on a particular thing some cognitive decline only three of issues that we could see the balance of the supply because apparently doctors best work that some other way but on of the three responses that my client made one of the three the doctor your stand in recess and take up the last two cases of the morning