i do we know there that that is actually and to parody report or not because your honor if if you look at the report itself it classifies it actually has a section on eligibility for each of the rivers and the concern is that for instance on sycamore creek or the west fork of the black river these are wild rivers because of standing apparent habitat and native trout habitat and we're concerned that you know authorizing activities forcers is basically there what you're saying then consider me to take into account i'll take a look at which would be to ensure that the remarkable values identified in your are at least protected and tell congress to make a decision on what to do with them and put it down in the report that we took into account amend its forest plans now to include protective measures for these river segments and joining agency from approving a wide range of new projects including timber water resources mineral development and crane saying until those measures are river areas within the united states shall feel that he waited and planning reports with that information it carries out the first sentence and affording the consideration of the forming of the consideration is the three elements under its procedures that has adopted now these reports are information that the forest service now has it will be very beneficial to the forest service when it conducts its planning process and the next four at the next forced plan or vision  service to conduct these reports in the course of its planning process and three or four and to do them in a specific way these for example these reports they are very thorough and they will be a very good source of information but they're not  done when the forest service is typically done and they do not take into account all of the aspects that the forest service takes into account one example of that is the regional or national consideration for example we are talking about a potential recreational  wild and scenic river one thing that the forest service would consider is whether on a regional scale people would come from far away to use this river recreationally the primary the primary way that rivers are protected under the law and scenic rivers is where congress quest or doesn't request states that certain rivers will be studied under five congress has provided specific protections for such as are areas that are being studied seven plan dates for that differ according to the river the start it's very from two thousand and four through two thousand and nine let me see if i let me see if i understand your position and apparently you agree that  judicial intervention would in appropriately interfere with further administrative action and in this case it clearly would the forest service has a plan to conduct a systematic review furthermore in this case under the second  due to the fact that the center has brought this action in the absence of any specific proposal or project that would provide the requisite background in focus for court at this point in time the issue that is before the court is no just this is the substance challenge substantive challenge asking for a protective measures to be employed then it when they have not been and are not required to together they apply the same they do it in the storm way and it's also it's also relevant that the entire burden of this is not it does not fall on the forest service but now these were forest service and ninety three reports of forest