argument by making an admission and that admission is though i have filed many appeals previous to this one and since this one this was my st case that was ever and so i'm saying that because as i have made i've made some were mistakes in the process refiling the appeal and throughout the whole process and so that's what his edits of a colorful history of this case some say there's no writing around sorry that is the colorful history can and can we ask you a special question certainly we're in the record for the circuit court enter an order reinstating its decision of june that there is no judgment of the circuit court and the record there that reaffirms its decision it's affirming of the worker's compensation decision  candidly which case we have no jurisdiction here or you know well i can appreciate that and that's also the crux of our argument which is counsel looked at the order the circuit court signed the order and the order doesn't fact have reaffirmed the decision but i can accept that the court is presenting now that does not says if that order to is deficient then this court obviously would not have jurisdiction but i could stand to be corrected on that point maybe opposing counsel has another argument perspective on the order  from that draft edition were i wrote it and opposing counsel is reviewed it before it was submitted to the court so i wrote it is in my handwriting but all three of us i would say we collaborated on the language i drafted it they reviewed it we submitted it but if if we were all mistaken then this court would not have jurisdiction but we haven't heard any other attorneys yet so we'll see what they have a very very resting your argument at this point brief we noted that the decision should have said that the court has been sitting its own earlier judgement affirming the commission's decision we thought that it was that it if the court c meant to establish just dixon well i mean we we we entered an order telling him if they were able to prove that it was served in time that he was to reinstate his decision confirming the commission there is no order reinstating his decision confirming the commission  no it was it was sufficiently clear so easy that he didn't follow our mandate in didn't reinstate his decision confirming the commission we're back to the question we asked your opponent where's or jurisdiction well we thought he did do that but just made a clerical error in the in in the form of the order let's not clerical error it says what it says this isn't a your honor i mean at it seems like i missed a lot and know what what occurred before but based on the context of the interchange that i have been part of it appears that maybe the appellate court doesn't have appeal should be dismissed and then the commission's decision should stand i think if there is an argument to be made that there was if any a clerical error here i respectfully disagree with your honor regarding that because it was in the judicial commission that was added it were it wasn't something that the judge in the circuit court judge mcginley had to simply just invent it was part of of the original functional reinstating the commission's decision if they need to be that and that would be what we would ask for let's get something straight so that we don't wind up doing this again if we find no in as soon as it reinstates its original order confirming the decision it's from that point that the notice of appeal time runs not from any nonsense of non proton or any of the rest of it it's from the time he enters the final order so the we don't have you coming back here arguing silliness that there was no jurisdiction to hear an appeal if a final order is enter original order we vacated it and we told him that if he found that he had jurisdiction to reinstate his order and once he reinstate at some point in time the appeal time will come pence running had to be the date of the final order we vacat