previously b q this court has he actually looked at and considered fifty complaints that were five and from those fifty eight of them i believe was did not that there was not a single case where a witness was brought into the room to be used against a defendant there was one case where we said should turn over the case that i just described which i'm describing again so there isn't a pattern in the fifty complaints that we reviewed regarding false promises of leniency there  go now you're asking us to ignore that record which is documented in the previous decisions and say that was a mistake or something when the lawyer for mr house granted because you couldn't compile the appropriate record where those o p s records are but i do know that we have previously all of them and i don't think it's appropriate for you to ask us to compile a record how case where willie lloyd witnessed it occurred on october twenty seventh up the statement that he apparently gave was an act over twenty later the next day so how do we  instance if you put trying to explain to me and this is another thing i don't particularly think this is is a good notion but police officers  but when when police tell somebody you know tell us you murdered someone here we're going to let you go home i mean would that be kind of thing that how is it different from these other which disclose any promises of leniency so we sort of i mean you're asking us to go there again i'm sort of going back to the beginning but you're asking us to look at these complaints that we've already statement he testified at trial he put himself there he said that he had to go with which one which one of the guys whether they yet go and he knew that if he didn't he would be killed or or that she was delivering the information as she became more comfortable in her surroundings i mean isn't that really how it works they try to say as little as possible because every minute the whole kind of picture under which these people are operating where you say she's terribly incredible when in fact a jury could easily conclude that she's extremely credible because they're all operating under this dictatorship of these games where the guy at the top is directing everything down so all you say she's terribly incredible but actually it could be concluded that she's extremely credible because she actually pulled the trigger versus an accountable individual has anyone argued that in any of these cases i apologize if i am not i do not know of bad debt that has the two marias that argument right and not determine the credibility stage so we don't know whether or not there's an argument that we should really look at those thirty two now let's go to the a take it that were here before but are here now those five us absolutely i will quickly do not  from those eighteen that absolutely do not include how can we did find a pattern that kato and those other detectives were doing this and that or how do we find from the eighty we know he's not in that group my guess is that the defendant would hope that if there's evidence of misconduct by another detective which by the way because conviction would certainly have towards the second book but i as i said we we've already reviewed these but i don't know how we're supposed to use them again when they're not here now i think it's time you discussed the townson case mind set by the united states supreme court as to rock the ages of inappropriate for mandatory death with them are we we don't have to say that you don't have to but the united states supreme court richer than others and they'll be those that aren't as mature as as of so there's this contrast between each individual and there's no moral rule for this under our statute is there the there and you felt a little you're getting story the latest there is your cat you said there's no institutional problem at all with this but i mean i know that's really was the year before he was eighteen years old was two months the line has to be drawn somewhere else this is really the united states supreme court has said it comports with our constitutional requirements and it doesn't shock doesn't think that the courts should consider any factors when they impose the sentence and when the lord says if you will a trigger you have to get life if you participated with less than they have you still get you don't think set everything that you're saying in terms of you know he was there he helped get into the car he was armed with a firearm then they were taken away and then they were subsequently execute facts but the question here is what about the sentencing scheme that our constitution provides that there are to be factors consider by the court on either side and under this story scheme the fit that this kid was nineteen years old in two months doesn't mean a thing the fact that his mother died a few months speak for this incident doesn't mean that th e fact that actually his mother maybe it was his mother's mother that cared for him but the fact is that his main care giver died within the year as the record shows you never had a father in his life ever the record shows that he didn't complete high school and sell it take a child that he has all these other benefits that yes two parents that graduate from high school it goes  it's it's adequate options either to sentence him to death but work sufficient big factors to preclude death and then he goes on to consider what there weren't any consideration it was absolutely mandatory life get let's go let's go over his own statement as testimony a trial will be admitted to the assistant state attorney and the police officers as far as this actual culpability regarding the shooting that took well isn't it true though that the evidence shows that there were people that were in the cars with the hoods up and that there were others who were actually executing those young men because there are people that were really at the actual shooting they really doesn't help that at all there is restoration here on day six reading about accountability there's no consideration of each useless family history background education employment it's all wall and you're saying that that