bankruptcy is an option for the unfortunate that are told that several times by my attorney and several other people bianca however is a liar and a perjure that would seem to be a pretty strong contention on my part but i will do my best to explain the grounds and the reasoning for that assumption of guilt as a reasonable person i believe that raul attorney ralph rayburn whose testimony appears in docket fifty five the transcript of trial of september twenty ninth two thousand and seventeen pages thirty two line twenty four to page sixty two line fifteen would not knowingly or unknowingly lie in any court proceeding and i've never met the man i heard him on the telephone during the trial testimony as in point thirteen in my informal brief to this distinguished panel mr raeburn asserts that quote typically the retainer agreement describes that i'm representing her on a personal injury claim and that's the extent of it i didn't have any discussion about bringing up property damage claim or what value to place on that claim mr raeburn continues well i handled two cases for her but i'm not are you asking did she think i was going to defend a small claims case that i didn't know had been filed against her i have no idea i'm not aware that the case had been filed against her and continuing he says quote again i'm not sure what the whole thing is that you're referring to but the scope of my representation was to resolve to personal injury claims and in the process of doing that we also had to try to negotiate and resolve liens and litigate lonel including personal injury liens in both cases but never anything to do with property damage quote i don't know where she would have come by that i don't know that that would be within my sense of her having a reasonable appreciation for me to get involved in that claim so no i don't see where she would have thought that i was involved with it unquote the court that went on to a lunch break and we came back proximately an hour later and at two thirty two thirty pm about three hours later my attorney misc i began direct examination of mish monk on page one thirty of document fifty five the trial testimony mr monk asserts that quote so upon my attorney's advice he said because he meaning me had filed the small claims case to just not deal with it at that point my attorney questions are so does this mean that if you had not gotten a judgment you were going to pay him and she says quote that is what that means further beginning on page one forty nine line fourteen of i had to appear in court for the judgment i asked him what i should do there and then i was served with the judgement i asked him what i what his advice was to do about that unquote question from misc who was your personal attorney answer from issue quote ralph rayburn when i first got served with the paperwork to appear he told me that it was a waste of my time to go down there i would miss work take time off to go down there it was a judgment it was money i owed he said not to go down there it was just going to issue a judgment quote and then the judgment did come he told me that at that point he didn't say his exact words were not in my understanding of what he said was that voided the contract and it was treated like every other judgment that i had a question from is scott so did you think you didn't have to pay it answer from miss strong that was what my understanding from the conversation was yes a question from a scot did your attorney tell you to do that answer i don't recall in those specific words i don't recall what the specific words were that he used but that's the ender standing that i got from the conversation question from is scott so you talked to him about not paying my client out of the settlement money is that correct response answer was yes further in exhibit four from docket fifty or document fifty page ten of nineteen line fourteen trust the iler asked have you transferred cash or assets worth more than one thousand dollars to friends or relatives since october first of last year on line seventeen missed monk answers no point twelve my informal clearly highlights this transaction as perjury under oath to trust the iler and in trial testimony document fifty five pages one thirty two lines nineteen to one thirty three line thirteen mish monk clearly admits to transfer of funds quote to her boyfriend savings account two thousand three hundred dollars now those two items are just highlight the fact that  story of the fabricated lie that mr raeburn lied in his testimony to judge her daughter's court and that she is by all means truthful in my other points that i had in my case i brought up several perjurious items that she submitted with her bankruptcy petition and those items i have found to be exactly that perjury in my estimation the schmuck should be sent to jail fined for each of those and would care less about my two thousand something dollars judgment that i got from the eugene small claims court also i have a thirty six thousand dollar bill from my attorney mistah and her her paralegal and i would almost be willing to forego if mr monk could be taught a lesson not to continuously a lie in the five twenty three cases and in the seven twenty seven case well i'll address the five twenty three as for us in the five twenty three cases it says that fraud hindering prosecution or hiding assets is exactly what i sued for it took me three times to get it right with an attorney's advice finally but i didn't get it right judge hersh or allowed us a seven twenty seven claim dangled it out there in front of us and we took it and then in the closing arguments he seemed to take it away i don't have a problem with the way the judge her sure decided th case i just have a problem with judge hersh or believing that mish mung could possibly be anything but a liar and a perjury and that is the extent of my case i would i would have asked this panel this distinguished panel that this appeal be decided in my favor first of all on the merits of the five twenty three five twenty three there was obvious fraud from time immemorial she strung me along for two years and said that she was still out of work when in fact she was working five weeks after this accident on nov thirteenth two thousand and thirteen so it could have been paid off a long time ago i considered in my mind that the two thousand three hundred dollars that she took out of her account after she got her four thousand seven hundred dollars settlement i considered that the two thousand three hundred dollars that she took out of her count and transferred to her boyfriend's account just might be the amount of money that she was going to pay me before i ever brought this case but that didn't happen and the twenty three hundred dollars never made it back to her account the following day after she made that withdraw all she went to the next quali casino in snow kwame washington spent three days there and the twenty three hundred dollars never came back i have no idea where it went she says it went to pay bills i doubt that she's lived the cash existence for the last two and a half years  scuse me the last four and a half years until she went to file her bankruptcy and when she did that as i pointed out in my an informal briefing when she did that she chided she told trustee iler that she had no changes to make on any of her bankruptcy schedules and then the day before that trustees meeting there were several accounts that were closed and new accounts that were open a savings and a checking account meaning of predators and i've asked that she be put in jail and i thank the panel for their time thank you very much for your presentation do you have any questions