tighten we pay medical bills containing petitioner's exhibit number five which is contained in the record on pages four hundred sixty through four hundred ninety three what the commission will only ignored in issuing this decision hundred seventy eight this one document is why the commission's decision goes against the manifest weight of the evidence so under section eight point two d one of the act all payments for the bill shelley  bills and the plain language of the act uses the particular word adjudicate which can only lead us to infer that the elements required for payments and medical bills are the same elements for the list by which the commission would consider the medical records and bills that are necessary to adjudicate the claims we were asking for other codes or different off or much more specific tax forms it with documentation which to us means paper documents which were not include so the and i hope that answers your question your honor what we have here is we have a request for payment the bills we have within five days which is well within thirty days required by the act we have a notice to to show that we do not have all  questions we have yes medical records are wired to educate americans the need even need to be included when building a timer and actually point to the point to di i'm sorry i get tripped up sometimes referring to that particular set it's the petitioners burd proof of whether or not medical treatment is causally related to or in the alleged working injury and they didn't get that letter was sent there was a dispute as to whether or not that was in fact the case because of some missing  numbers or something because of some missing documents the records themselves the records which would have shown in the history that the petitioner had provided physical examinations and diagnostics that were those were what was missing it wasn't necessarily col or you before the forms it was specifically documentation which would have causally related the bills and the treatment that was sought to the alleged work injury so interested very quickly benefits the burden is on him or spot or the ploys are to provide a reasonable defense for miles benefits are not paid he gave us what he believes was a reasonable excuse there was missing documentation so presented with medical bills for payment and they have an issue there it's requests further information from the provider not from the employee there is no evidence nor was there ever any evidence presented that the employer it is not reasonable to assume they do not have the necessary documentation just from the specific fields service and he points to this issue of whether or not there are enough data court must overturn the decision of the commission we we tend to refer to one thousand al penalties as what is to say quote unquote late payment but the gas states it is a it is actually worse than that it's not just a late payment there needs to be in before and after with the same set of bills it was only when the employee sent them in this particular batch and all of a sudden there was a problem so what can you eliminate why this is the case it will be the bills were the bills were not were of tain the records were received from that with this particular batch there were no records along with these pills that pesky absolute crux of this argument is that these particular bills and this particular letter was sent in september twenty first team did