MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
something at all period no matter what it is you can't even accept a christmas card and so i guess i have to say if you accept a christmas card it doesn't seem worse when you say really egregious or something like that  where do you think that really that just happened because my understanding is that i need to go speak to the supervisor of the lieutenant in charge my understanding is he didn't tell lies because of anything about the gift it was when he went to the supervisor that he told her about t well because if it was probably the best place for mr holder to be the agency could keep an eye on him he did not have any contact with the maids the paralegal is no longer coming t no foul miss laredo only had kind of this inmate he's got a line so we can leave this guy place there really isn't any more risk there's nothing to be concerned about he doesn't have direct contact with the inmates well if all of that is true then why contact with inmates and so in that position is visiting a school after the agency could keep an eye on him and minimize his contact with inmates and so they're like i said there was no guarantee that he would be just another position for the rest of his career and it's unclear when the warden side that he had that he made the decision that you know we cannot have this guy in a corrections officer yet must not have been made when they gave them accommodation right because you know between the time when this happened and and and the time is finally removed he actually received a commendation from his supervisors right so must be the word and didn't decide highly regarded employee for a very long time and it seems like he's got one wonders obviously europe believe that was a very serious one mission can you describe why i integrity has been compromised and you may do it again unless we take care of the situation the warden made that determination him twenty nine years of experience that wouldn't and he's seen this before seen this type of situation before in his considered judgment mr colbert had been compromised and cannot be trusted to perform his job as a corrections officer
here it is the greatest advance in television since color television itself the ultimate in performance and convenience seven function remote master crafted of the finest woods but the outstanding feature of this great new color set the one big feature that sets it apart is an amazing new wireless wizard electronic remote control so perfected you can operate every control all seven functions and each function is completely variable tent color brightness tuning channel selection on off you can tune either with the remote unit from your easy cab or use the push button panel in the cabinet here hidden is the push button panel it operates exactly in the same way as the wireless remote unit these rock of laws control all of the necessary owning functions to use the seven function wireless wizard remote control turned on the power for the remote amplify i set from then on the set is off work of on remote push button tuning this red button lights up and signals that the remote amplifier air is on and ready for  take the remote unit from its handy storage space and you're set for hours of fuel up pleasure and joy your favorite programs black and white a color turn the set on select your channel see all colors show in living color once you've adjusted fine tuning for each channel you never need to fine tuning again either at the set or on the remote unit but if you want touch and you're going to just fine tuning to suit your taste at any time if you omit tune on this or any other control just push the companion buttons or a very direct in of the control in the same way press this rock a bob to adjust the color barrier though all the way from black and white to maximum color intensity all the left lets you enjoy the picture you want the way you want to see it right at your fingertips i just brightness li like all the controls on this remote unit the volume is fully variable select any volume you want for the telephone ring or guests arrive and you want to lower the sound  conversation turn the volume down to your taste boss surround yourself with room feeling  the pre selected local channels while this front window channel indicator lets you know what a glance what channel your viewing even from across the room this botto remote control amplifier is still on ready for you to return to any later program you wish to see to turn off his separate remote amplifier press this button on the push button panel when light is extinguished you know both amplifies on turned off yes here is the ultimate in television a supreme achievement in television engineering  set that puts aussie a vector is ahead in dependable performance on kid a convenience luxury a styling a set where the pride of ownership is truly
hello everyone my name is michael marx i live here in richmond and i am a candidate for a seat on the unified school board representing richmond in the upcoming election in november it's unusual of course for us to have an election involving school issues in november but this year we have one and it's very important there are two items on the ballot the first item on the ballot is the question of whether we will unify governance among all our schools within the amount mansfield union area at this point we now have eight different school boards governing all of our schools and taxes within mt mansfield despite the fact that for fifty years we've had a single board which has been primarily responsible for governing mt mansfield and all students in grades five through twelve for over a year now i've been part of an effort to study analyze and present a proposal to unify that governance and as part of that proposal we are electing a new school board on november fourth if the article passes we will take office and we will govern a unified school system if the article does not pass then then none of the new school board members will take office i've worked hard on this because i believe it is a great opportunity for us in richmond and throughout our communities to work together on a common community that is dedicated to meeting the needs of both students and taxpayers we face enormous challenges in education today our taxpayers are very stressed by property taxes at the same time while we have good schools we need to do better and we need to meet the needs of all of our students we need to be in a position as a community to be both as cost effective as possible and as innovative as possible to meet those needs of both students and taxpayers and that's the reason we have presented a proposal to merge governance for the school for the school systems and in a way it's very simple for fifty years we've had a mansfield model and that map meals filled model has been very successful all of our neighboring communities have united together and i think on balance we've done a good job of meeting students needs and also meeting taxpayers expectations but unfortunately we can't do that for all our students because our governance model now has us pulling eight different school boards six of them for elementary schools mansfield and then to try to tie it all together to chip in the supervisory union so i'm running for this board in the hopes that we as a community can approve article one can move forward with a new governance structure and then we can work on tackling our problems as a community together as opposed to a fragmented entity now if you want more information about this i would encourage you to come to any of our public forums that we're running through out the district up to the sunday before election we also have a wealth of information on the chin and the supervisor union website and i hope all voters will become as informed as possible and i welcome your input and i hope that we can work together to try and make both our schools better and relieve the burden on our taxpayers
who am i well i am shot my name is sean ruttledge and you know this is a video pretty much like my life so one thing you really need to know about me is that i have a lot of pets i have about seven cats and two dogs now and some people believe that sort of combination is not good having cats and dogs and with each other but it's actually pretty cool because all the animals together have their own collective influence in the home they have they have their very own unique personalities and characteristics that add more color to the palate of my home and i really appreciate that because without them if you just be so poor he'd be so great and i wouldn't like to come much with them you know i look forward to seeing my family when i come home that is me and like i said this i'm shot my name is sean ratliff i'm seventeen years old and in the twelfth grade i go to face to face academy for my education and hope to be graduating twenty  fifteen this is my d v d collection i have a lot of d v d s now i've seen most of them there's probably a few i haven't seen but i did you know i don't have the time to watch all of the people that want this is my park or class and what park or is is learning how to travel through your environment the most fast and effective way possible and i really like park or a lot i mean if it's really fun and you feel free doing it it is just it's just a great thing to do this is my park or instructor cameron and he is a really good park or instructor and he's also really good at it and i've been doing this class for all the about eight months maybe nine months or so this is my gym partner's last part are grey and we work out at arlington rec center workout i work out actually for about five to four days and he works out about three days a week in the week and we usually work out together on thursday friday or saturday i really enjoy exercise because exercise is it builds more confidence and you feel more able to do things as that of having anxiety over challenges that calm and that's always something you can use  what if you always need that in life but another thing that i really like about exercise is just how intense it is it's the intensity there's something about waking up sore in the morning that you just feel like you've accomplished something like you work hard and that's just a great feeling for me probably only for me i don't know about everybody else but it's something i look forward to be clean and well this is  and i hope you learned a lot about me
wage more bitter and effective warfare and in the some infested waters of the atlantic sealing the u boats must be battle to the death to stop production must go through or upon the battle of the atlantic the men of the coast guard do their job and do it well yeah the stars have a job to do too perhaps our jobs are not for the moment so exciting as sending a depth charge over a cutter side or seeing a telltale oral flick rise from a plastic cup but they are vital learn to take orders under carry them on your prior new day give you confidence you learn to manage with others and to work with them and you learn to do we are the best is a proud tradition of the coast a man can go to see you take over his job with the same rating same place same privileges and the same responsibilit these are the jobs which must be done by spot movement of ships and men and trusted to paper is also entrusted to you there are many jobs the coast guard need you for here to spot takes over and one more pharmacist may can go to see at coast guard headquarters in washington as men go to battle fires take increasingly important time radio technicians are being trained to maintain the coast guard contact between ship and shore if you want to hear history in the making you couldn't pick
this time of year mcnabb versus is whether mr mcnabb exhausted his administrative remedies against officer miller the answer is no mr mcnabb did not file a grievance with the inmate grievance clerk during the prescribed time frame now i wan address one of the attachments to appellants reply brief for the first time in this litigation mr mcnabb tendered a grievance form that he claims to have filed six months after the incident took another paper again attached to his reply brief it peach can it appears that it was just rejected by the clerk because it was six months after the incident whereas the time limit in the grievance rules was twenty one days unless you applied for an extension and if you apply for an extension you could get up to forty five days after the grievance now there is no record even in the attachments to the reply brief that mr  mcnabb applied for an extension on and what i want to say about that document is is that first it wasn't submitted in opposition to summary judgment second it wasn't referenced in mr mcnabb's objections the magistrate's reporting recommendation and third it wasn't in his opening brief and on appeal so i think it can be disregarded but if the court chooses to review and credit that document the grievance w properly rejected as on time it was filed well beyond the twenty one day limit the alleged strip search occurred on march thirty first the grievances dated almost six months later in september under the supreme court's decision in woodford fifty five forty eight u s eighty one the p l r a requires proper exhaustion which includes compliance with the administrative deadlines it's mr mcnabb did not pursue the grievance process properly by filing his grievance on a timely basis and for that reason the judgment below should be affirmed in favor of officer miller unless the court has any questions for me that's the point i felt it was necessary to address thank you will reserve cases taken on three mission that's the last case on calendar please i
public health nursing is a little bit of everything i'm a quarter a salesman a diplomat for clinics are all specialized one afternoon for instance we only see expectant mothers but each one is a different problem because each one is a different person they feel their special tools and always seem amazed when i discover they have something in common with the other women but that's natural after all we all think of our health problems as personal problems was last month and what his father wants him to be with you grows up his mother and i are old friends that's the way it ought to be but it wasn't always that way when i first came to the clinic i used to get in the way people behave after all we were trying to help them you think they do their share they were all just cases to me in those days t b s with numbers and histories i had been trying to respect facts and facts were things that could be understo or seen a long spot for instance it's there on the x ray plate a change in what you can calculated by simple subtraction i was proud of my facts in those days i used to see the of a nurses the old timers like mrs jensen fussing with the patients i would hear her talking to them about their feelings so curving them to complain seemed to me i felt that period because i didn't waste time and energy getting involved with patients as i put it i thought of nurses like mrs jensen as old fashioned small talk seemed so on scientific the side there was no time for chit chat with the pressure of the case loads we were carrying just getting through the day was a miracle then one day i came up against the situation that my science couldn't cope with i had gone out with the other girls that morning headed for the schools and factories and home where we did our field work this day though was a tough one for me and by the afternoon i was tired and cross besides my last visit was a long ride up to curry ville one of our suburbs for the style patient to come see the doctor delivering a personal invitation or live t just trip through the outskirts and past the mining section the patient with the miners wives and i had plenty of time to do well for the situation i was going at the suggestion of ms roberts my supervisor but i can't say i thought it was a good idea this patient was pregnant and had been referred to our clinic three months before by her dr no i had to go all the way on to her home because she had broken her appointment again and again even though she was in perfect health as far as i could make out well by the time i got there i had decided to be as pleasant and polite as possible after all calls the call good afternoon at the theatres i missed the health center i sent you a card because i couldn't contact you by telephone yes i know i got your car this morning well aren't you going to ask me t peters i'm used to husbands we get along fine
that one in one environment and taking a young green officer walking alongside them and slowly giving them more information part of it especially early on the training officer will do a lot of the work with  probation serving and then as the process continues that pendulum starts to swing where the probation officer is doing more and more of that while the training officer is now observing and making sure that the  comes along with it here's what i observed and here's what you need to do better you know or here's what you did really well odd you know working through those things to bring out attributes that we want to see in these young officers to be
to justice counsel said that i drew a distinction between the agency and the congress when i was trying to distinguish the underlying product from nandrolone but that's not the distinction which was bad faith because it violated clear statutory duty or was deceptive for some other reason i was trying to articulate the point that whether it's the agencies or congress
thousand and seven mr brown she was convicted of distributing approximately one half gram grant of maryland which resulted in the death of an individual who has several handlers down the chain from the original sale and decided in the six question i'm asking you all other matters why isn't the law of the case the end of this the supreme court has started that one court of appeals should not disagree different standard and developed the defense under a different standard so now looking at the facts of that case as developed by defense counsel in light of one standard we believe it's a circuit miss understands that there are arguments that would have been made that were only relevant if the correct standard had applied and because the correct standard was not applied if defense counsel had been making those arguments the government could very properly have said those are all straw man arguments we don't need to show but for cause they said i want you to shelve this contributory weight and into that into the body of the unit and essentially that was in essence a murder weapon and because that their party took that action and we would argue if we were able to present this case a get a new under the correct standard that that one question for you if you aren't you argue in your brief that twenty two forty four b by its terms precludes the request for relief under twenty two fifty five how can that be the case gates are addressed again then you can get your case reevaluated under the twenty to forty one which of which will often be a different circuit because it's first district of incarceration rather than the district of conviction we understand that we have challenges on getting through all the pre
the change or excuse me that that nature of the case does not allow her to snog get rid of the conviction for purposes of a fifty one for instance this court has said th dismissed also there have been cases involving experiments and that's the same similar sort of situation defendant serves their sentence shows good behavior for how long the statute for their state requires this different situation however count gornja has said there that this is no longer a felony conviction in fact it is a misdemeanor conviction so what has happened as a result is that a misdemeanor the current state and i think in the here this particular issue is not been started by this court but a couple of issues couple of other circuits have and recently the third circuit went along with the ninth circuit and the d a s holding the night at the d a s holding with the ninth circuit holding and i know that it's a little bit odd that we're here saying the ninth circuit were and were in the ninth circuit for this undermined case in the ninth circuit has decided against it i think the ninth circuit their reasoning is in that it doesn't really deal with in the supreme court's cases or johnson or in the footnote i believe it was in me neal i think it was in that case basically the court there has not the supreme court also hasn't reached this issue but has given an indication yet that state court retroactively makes this type of change that you follow the state could consider the effect of that saying yes you're correct and i should clarify that but i think it's clear that this is something that is contemplated that i mean that they're saying is by that i mean there is a different 's certainly applicable based not on anything the individual does but into this entire group of people because the state of california has determined that that conduct is not qualified for felons first time so it's a misdemeanor across the board it's just a different situation and proposition forty seven indicated that it was for all purposes and this would be one purpose also we have i want to briefly touch on  district level but not at the time but i didn't bring the protection and the federalism but i think when you look at the situation where we're talking about the fact that this applies to a particular group of people not based upon
of the points i want to stress and i've made all the points i wish to make completely in the briefs are first that there were two different prosecutions here second that the malicious prosecution claims should be analyzed under both the fourth and fourteenth amendments because as to one of them there was a seizure and as to the other which is to be analyzed on the fourteenth amendment there was no palliation alleged and third that the burden of proof properly should be on the fence with respect to the warrantless arrest because there was no warrant i have nothing to add to that and if there are any questions i'll reserve all my time no my counsel to speak a little out of place scuse me i would like to submit that all of the points that were just raised by counsel are addressed in my brief and those points essentially can be distilled down to one issue overriding everything in this case which is probable cause and i believe the record is pretty clear that our officers declarations along with the supplemental information provided in the other declarations and the supplemental evidence even presented by the plaintiff himself summary judgment proceedings of support the finding of probable cause there's a moment in this case that i think really is the easiest moment to analyze and that is the moment when the officers arrived at the appellant's house anthony hart was his own volition if we look at the record the record is clear that the officers asked him to come outside of his house i know that in the proceedings below heart argued in his or at least  attorney argued that he had been coerced out of his house however there is just simply no evidence whatsoever to support that claim so looking at the summary judgment record which is what we have here there's simply no evidence to show anything  d he was asked to come out of his house so looking at that we just need to look at just of lee what facts of the officers established and i believe that between the declarations and again the supplementary evidence there's really grow the dark on that one either we understand and if appropriate also made a response when i read the case last i think it's an issue of fact