i don't know about anyone else but i'm having a lot of reception to the here i didn't hear your answer to my question when you said in this particular case the three districts and i lost your arc in your honor hear me and normally government will be able to designate that area or that level at which it is excuse me but there is a fire truck going by can you was the party that played a game truly got around to suing which was the district attorney's general now of course it is it presents a problem who are played to under these circumstances because the district litigation policy of the defendants in this case that indicates that it would result in an unfair consequence or missed inconsistency or unfair tactical advantage such if i could really go to the sort of the specifics of a person who is an employee of the state see let's go to cut to the chase that there is a lawsuit and this man is really an employee of shelby county or th a district attorney general does tennessee have laws that give him any rights st from that perspective that is are all d tennessee employees just out of luck because they can't have any protection from the state of tennessee and then alternatively because as an f l us a claim is it simply the tennessee has no obligation to any of its employees under arrest let let me be clear your honor under these circumstances and the record shows that mr ray was a criminal investigator are not subject to suit and to be frank mr wright is out of luck in terms of his damage claim that he is asserting under the error labor standards act there is no corollary state of affairs labor standards act which we are familiar  it is part of the circumstances that and correct me if i'm wrong that the tab that almost everybody in the task force is an employee elsewhere or are there is  criminal inspector for general eric she was he was an employee is now retired general work so yes he is or once a and employee of entity in essence a bill whether a benevolent police association which was not a governmental entity and so under those circumstances that is quite different from the  district attorney generals they were all state employees as were answer was mr wright while he was employed by the by the  in that circumstance the state had maintained a consistent across the board condition position and that there was no waiver litigation conduct  cilia said that in essence that the state of robot rhode island there should not be required to choose between its right to assert immunity from suit or searching african americans owning a terrorizing island or a law and according to state's position there is no remedy because they say you can't see passports because it's not an identity and you can see the district attorneys general because they have sovereign immunity even though they're not acting like prosecutors they're basically creating a law enforcement and it's important to know that this group is an ongoing body police officer i call it was a dog hand certainly a possibility that an entity that you know has a six story building in nashville and hundreds of employees in its own name might be treated differently than this task force but that would depend on facts i was also take the same position the task force is nothing more than the d a s acting so either way the d n a if it's not a separate entity it was the district attorney's action that removed the case the problem i see that i'm o