itself for the impediments requires me to slowly but surely that the court know what with it an expectation but i'm going to say it i don't know why i am going to say it maybe just there are putin for me because i want to see families in the situation i come from a big family i could go running on to talk about relationships and in sync by saying i the decision finally came  major fine for the six cases have different parties in it you know i remember a little bit about evidence how do you have a situation will take judicial notice of matters where in fact the parties there's corey heard a lot of testimony in this case you've served the witnesses he was able to weigh the evidence he made factual findings that there was a new influence exerted on this  napoli leaves out what for a fax this court this will was done after she had a horrible stroke even after all the family strife that went on in the this we're going to go to intensive therapy at the time she went to keep reminding me taylor case who did the initial meet v this is before she goes to the intensive treatment in chicago about a month later when she has to chicago this speech therapist whose deposition is in the case that she could understand maybe three to four there really was no cognition about what the testator did and i don't know i had my stroke is so bad i don't know what i don't know and the most telling thing is bess undisputed in the record is the deposition of the person who was in charge of the case and that's what they told me when they came in and if you look at paul's testimony  cross comes back by mr taylor brings her back this is before we go to chicago where they say she can understand three words at a time he for my kids testified well i set with her for two hours and we went through the entire thrust and she seemed to understand him what was going on even though she was difficult in the money and said i don't have a real recollection of our meeting but if the court looks at it if there's a person who is taken to a specific you know high tech sophisticated rehab program when they said she can't if you look there's a lot of examples well i think that has to do with the undue influence in that she is more susceptible and i think both testified she is for susceptible to influence because she doesn't understand and i that is part of our also people is that clearly we don't think she had capacity i think judge cory erred in that respect in that eat every healthcare professional d minutes after that even though the doctor has recommend after the stroke and again there were things that were done that kept her away from patty in here because it gets you know all  really take her out of the hospital every two weeks and take her home the roomie in this should be that the courts go back to evidence isn't contradicted lou ignore the doctors we're not taking her back we're not going to give her medication and then they take her to an attorney to get a twenty page trust and that's actually stup read and try to understand and at that point in time she can understand three or four words at a time so i'm asking the court to affirm the finding of undue influence if judge corey heard the witnesses he has the evidence but i don't believe that he thief the appropriate remedy you have to strike that whole that is if the instrument is faulty for whatever reason a new influence you can't have any effect from from that instrument it's just going to be gone you go back to the prior instrument so what he should have done was say look there's undue influence i have to toss this trust that was done after the stroke and i have to return to the prior incident which splits four ways d because he was unduly influence on top of that i think it's clear from the record if you read judy vols testimony in who's the therapist who goes after the  me this woman because of the stroke would understand very little and there is no way it would work reads false testimony if you can't understand three words at a time and you can't repeat three words at a time but somehow you can understand i've got this whole plan for my probate and how i want my estate be given out when the and again ball says i couldn't even value with her because she couldn't understand questions so i would pose to the court there is no way that she could understand this is my property this is my to distribute my property and i am going to prepare a test material so as to marry instruments so i i think the court should affirm judge gori saying that it was undue influence also find became a part and there was all the family dynamic that i don't think that added or did practically anything i mean just for you just said look this is a family dispute big proportions  mr rock's position especially in so far as the will is concerned when the article one of the well my family she means all her children and then she says i hereby acknowledge the existence of my between this between these family members i don't read that order or that that made any difference in his evaluation of the piece he's just saying look this is this is one of the warring families of all time you know i've been through this here's here's what i saw that all of these people have had numerous issues over the  you know go with what is in the record i don't i don't i think if you look at the order i took it to mean he just looked at this is confirmation that this is a family that doesn't get along well and will and i don't if you look at it i don't think he really draws anything more from that i don't want you to ok i just want to address the kevin sullivan testimony very quickly lives fifteen months after the stroke i don't think the time period is particularly relevant yes she got better but the point is she does if you look at the timing she knows this complicated trust and then document done before we go to intensive treatment where also says you know she she really doesn't understand more than three or four words and i think that is the critical factor here why why on earth would you say let's go get a trust that is twenty pages long it stupefies lawyer trying to read it and understand it and then only then  these people and there was a lot of contradictory testimony and i think the court needs to say his finding of fact that there was undue influence has to be given some deference i do instrument i think for the tortious interference there could be attorneys fees and possibly other damages that you would not have under the just street we're going to we're going to take the difficult to say with her level of understanding ok maybe she didn't i'm in fact if you look at the testimony she she's really not hype isn't a lot of things so i i think