turbing the facts are very disturbing and other facts disturbing also on the fact that  but on page one thirteen of the joint appendix we say that it was finally tried council finally said look i'm here are going about a time limit you can't wait thirty one days this was wrong no good new diligence was followed bob police titled to get what i want those were so incriminating so prejudicial the regards of other information might have come in i believe there's a reasonable belief possible that a jury would not have found a reasonable doubt based on the other the other evidence that's why harmless or i think would be an improper stand as a worst case scenario i think we should be looking at a reversal here the government wants come back and try the case against kobe  he said jurisdiction was just one item i'm saying that isn't enough are my time is almost up of any question my that there are three items i would call the court's attention primarily the court ladies or force it said on page four thirty four that it was considering three specific exhibits these were phone conversations with the minor actually through the mother last their total six players they were found in the ol sealed joint appendix first six pages of it those are the three conversations on point you to please read those frankly or there's some ugly facts the truth of the matter is this woman this young lady was not scared of this man is for didn't feel threatened and he couldn't carry out anything anyway from jane he never threatened her it's  perfect example our gave me i represent someone once before said are you under subpoena this was a cd city case represent husband and wife wife punch like gonna he shows up for trial we of course hope she the common law exception and by the ruling for so i'm sorry it is wrong it's wrong to do that but i think just expressing a hope that you will not cooperate should not be i know the wa charge your correct that it is it is portable there is not a but there is also no rule that says that testimony i'm sorry sir no no there's no trust me there's no evidence that this was it didn't matter there's no testimony of bad faith there's testimony that they were attempting to try to set is that a requirement to show that he doesn't however that would show when we see when it's well that's one way or another way is the ages of sitting around drinking cokes and smoking cigarettes and not proven as expeditiously as they could that doesn't that doesn't appear in this record  top on honestly i can't give you an honest full answer of that as i would look at it so me as a cumulative basis if you take the information that was on the cellphone out of th me i hope you don't come testify against me case that's all i would suggest two years this just isn't that case this is a murder this as an intimidation the court relied on i believe it seconds second seventh this is an example of why i am adopting wrongdoing i think it's extremely important to realize that looking at one of the core tellus i'm looking at i'm looking at least three exit i'm not looking at this other speculation all these other wrongdoers i'm looking at three phone calls that cover two pages apiece and in those all that was said was i hope you're not cooperating and i hope the other minor isn't either i all of that evidence came in because of the wrongdoing exception so you got to look at both not just the start of one day and you know what it is not if it was on the cell phone it was also this  miner's testimony or information she gave to the police at the time all of that came in just because this man said i don't know i hope you don't don't testify against me and you know baby i hope you don't testify against me