the meeting the defendant's statements post miranda in the third main issue is whether the defendant's sentence means case was appropriate as to the first issue to defend his position the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant actually caused the death of his wife there was only one witness that testified for the state of the state in this case a doctor bad moment test he's not fo that the coroner found that there was no evidence of trauma related injuries but there was no evidence of strangulation or constriction of the seasons airways no significant injuries to the scene in this neck face or torso the his beliefs so we believe that there was not sufficient evidence to support causation now this leads into what happened with the deceased body in this case and we addressed this you know prior motion causation was a major from the time the defendant was released at the time it was cremated were causation with that issue i find it to be you know this wasn't a straightforward case so what happened we were never given the condition or if michigan confirmed that with any of the testing that had been done either by her or by the coroner's office did she she did after her testing she'll time that she leave the scene die of natural tested for those things it just said it was consistent with correct correct now so it will do that the issue of causation we have this very short term around the body and spews cremated and maybe if she had a continue questioning him he was never given an opportunity to consult with an attorney he after he made his request he was punished he was handcuffed he was told that he was in custody and then he was taken of empty promises that she's on the way we're going to go and pick her off and this went on and on and on because they know if that was his motive who brought to him that that would probably afford the investigation which the city have to do this constitutional rights to because he didn't feel you know but if i ask him you won't talk to me i think that even at this juncture because it was such a short period of time he didn't understand truly what having you trying to talk to were even meant so without giving him the opportunity to do that the question is by officer theorizing about the manner and cause of death which she sees not trained should not an expert to do that and the defendant's contribution to that and the dispute that wow the police said they were going to get different here than any other instances is that the wives have seen reports showed pressure on her back which could have been either from the palm of the hand or from it neat and it was sound enough to again cheaper for being able to breathe for a little to three minutes which clearly is now what happened before and even as that night the x the incidents of the evening the jurors were given the instruction the defense is for and they found it in court correctly and the fact that he was guilty of involuntary manslaughter in discussing sentencing the trial court very specifically said that he respected the jury's verdict on probably the defendant's mother there and we have testimony from two sisters why nobody is contacted and the bodies just set to a funeral home the records and if you think no one has contacted the record indicates and even the defendant nor his mother were contacted the record is tied with as to whether the victim's family was contacted will ari's so maybe they were contacted but by he said that he talked to a police officer to make the decision that the body was no longer needed so we have to sort of make the implication that he didn't talk to anybody want the body and she's got a couple sisters why would they want again i just might interment i was reading that in this is perhaps naive was that the entire discussion get the motion of the hearing in a motion to dismiss was that neither the defendant nor his mother were contacted and my after the body was cremated i do not know what point i believe discovery was tendered every point that they were given in court i do not know what was tendered at the point that they made the initial discovery