fact that at the time of the injury it was not actually traveling to with jobsite i believe it is exactly which i don't know that that through the wire and i think under the case law if you're traveling employing you're in the course of your employment from the in this case and the commission took it all the way the commission the one on the say and if you read the decision said if we find this case compensable we don't see were any case would be compensable and didn't give any justification for that the and that's why i'm was not driving the car and the car was given to her husband to use and the husband drove the petitioner and other a choice to or from the job sites you can pay for that while he was doing that and i think that that makes no difference in the record transportation was provided by the employer wasn't the vehicle wasn't directly provided to the employee he what it was provided to coal oil he to drive the petitioner to and from the job and i think because of that the employer also provided the transportation is therefore also expanded the scope of the employment in the arise you know been in the course of a point so when the this had approximately four o'clock in the afternoon she left the house the car was on the driveway she it was snowing there was snow not ice on the ground the two sure husband both testified that she had to walk on the public side way the if this is a norm employee coming going to and from work is not taxable that's true if this is a normal employee commute to and from work isn't that correct but again i think we can see this whole case turns on one very simple issue is he traveling employee so if the case one defines importing a traveling employee is one who is required to travel away from the employer's premises to perform his or her job and since we agree that the claimant didn't have  employers from the sister fix work site he was required to travel to various locations throughout the area to do the business of the employer i was he not the traveling the place i think the key phrase there is at the premises and not yet left her personal property when the injury occurred she had not been exposed to the hazards of the street or automobile as she had yet to get in a car or leave her own driveway close quote you believe that that's  accurate that does that take her out of the traveling employee doctrine you heard earlier the questions and answers and regards to traveling employee status  being available from the time of the employee to leaves the house and before getting into the car do you think that that's inaccurate and do you think of a commission statement here takes her out of the of the to subject themselves to the hazards of the street in this case the facts are clear the bell in the driveway behind it she had yet to leave her property her home her house her property we had similar decisions were world oil user walking to the car in the parking whom leaving hold until they return what is leaving home walking don't you have to walk outside of your house go somewhere to leave your house one i think that's where you turn to the other cases where talks about the street hazards when you leave your home to me that means when you leave your property when you leave your house when you leave your driveway when you leave your property as all get out into the general public into the street the case the cases that are presented the traveling salesman is getting on a street car one had already left his promises he was returning to his job site to pick up a briefcase he was on the street he was in the general public the cases and i presented the cases and they seem so you have to be on the street  somebody walks down to the edge of the driveway and fall and break your leg even though everyone agrees you're about to drive to the business side or the side that they were saying to them maybe they don't there's no compensation until they're moving from me but i do know she said she said there's a difference i don't think so i think she's still on her property whether we're talking about the little sidewalk in front of her house leading to her driveway i don't think that's the difference because she still falls on her property whether the legal world and i think that's that is the distinction here is that if she has to go into the street which she doesn't troll then she has exposed herself to the street hazards and she's left her home but since she's in her driveway she has yet to expose her on the premises so it's just a steward points either peafowl a couple of feet later he'd be covered but because he had the misfortune of falling at the end of the driveway he can't be a traveling employee if yes what you're saying is she had fallen in the street but i think it once it was reasonable and persil for her r l cider house in the snow to get into the car supplied by the employer therefore that test is met and she's a travel warning and i ask you based on that