the next matter on our calendar is jamelle williams versus new york hospital medical center  mr williams you go first proceed with the case and while here for the pill it's new york hospital blatantly and they tried to cover blatantly tried to cover up the means by which they use that first treatment on me  during a job interview which i had scheduled on the day which was scheduled for me now during the course of all that is here my civil rights was violated and obvious manner in which th point in points but that there was no sign in sheets that me going to the interview was a was just me only at the at interview from eight thirty in the morning to two dirty i was the only one present super supposedly being colleagues there was a room full of like ten other people to be interviewed at the hospital but yet they blatantly covered covered their tracks by dismissing each and every one of them and leaving me in the room and then a call on the couple police into to search me and harass me they had reception is there at the job interview  of the second out of the interview she was talking about up the phone was missing i wasn't even an area she blatantly pointed to me that i was only african american in the room and i speaking with conviction at this moment i sensed a mad it was a real high tension s from from the whole staff saying that stance but saying that i was the only person in the hospital for a job interview they called police on me and then the lady who supposedly misplaced her phone or lost her phone measures to differentiate me from everybody else as an individual they set me apart from a body as the hospital had the security guards harassed me the security guards called me out of my name the security guards was disrespecting me to hospital t she never even displayed in there even identify me as still in the phone it was an assumption of hers at the hospital and she was working for the hospital she was in a play at the top finishing up her interview finishing up her part she was going to be a doctor or carry and i represent defendant appellee york presbyterian queens formerly known as the new york hospital medical center of queens i'm sure your honour's this case has nothing to do with the conduct of the hospital given the no your honor it was the as it was the new york who is the new police department if anybody talk to police it's not clear in the complaint quite frankly your honor but even assuming the police did that they did yes your honor you can't put all of that that they were guiltless in this situation well even if that's true your honor there is no facts in the amended complaint or anywhere in the record that remotely suggests that this had anything to do whatsoever with the palace race or color and that's the central question here what i'm trying to understand more precisely what the facts are here and i think where where i am right now is that somebody complained about the loss of the phone and assumed that was it was the plan and then from that information that was reported to the hospital staff the hospital staff then called the police so the false assumption as if the plane if the complaint is to be read that way was on the part of the individual  the hospital was responding to her complaint that the plaintiff had taken the phone or belief that the play of the taking the phone is that is that is that accurate that's correct and then they called the police and the police it seems  the hospital was somehow involved with the harassment or the questioning none of those are in the amended complaint iran or those appear for the first time on the brief on appeal that he the appellate put together mr williams is pro se so we're going to give him some leeway in the quality of his pleadings that's fair your honor that being said that doesn't excuse him from leaving certain facts out of the amended complaint and again even if this court were to consider those facts as part of the amended compl t as i mentioned before none of them reflect race based animus on behalf of anybody at the hospital there were no there's no allegation that there were comments made because of the appellant's race or color there is no there are no facts to suggest that there was any animist or impropriety because of the appellant's race you know the again the appellant claims that there was a cover up but this is a cover up for what your honor there's no facts to support what this coverup  evidence in the record i seem to remember there's some evidence in the record that the person people who did qualify for the job that the thing you see in terms of their race yes you're all i'm glad you raised that judge walker so the there are there is evidence to suggest that that demonstrates that the two individuals that were hired for the position for which the appellant was applying for are african american males just like the appellant there was that that would have been in the complaint i'm just curious to know cedric how that came up short that was actually in the decision issued by the new york state if it is the decision issued by the new york state division of human rights which was in fact attached to the something bad happened to him and number three that something bad happened to him because he has protected class as this court and many other courts in the circuit have repeatedly held that is insufficient at the pleading stage to sustain a title seven by the defendant's misrepresentation of of bad people represent a hospital who is totally races and i'm not here to raise we anybody i'm here for justice and i'm here for people i was harassed by the hospital security and staff prior to the police coming in ok big question everybody in the waiting room but showed specific attention to me now i speak with conviction not upset i was the only african american in the whole building from eight thirty to two thirty in the afternoon i left my car there got three tickets and there's videotapes in is a proof of this if you give me the opportunity to present my case with project i'm prejudice today to get it clear that my kids should not be dismissed my case is very relevant to the cause at hand because i'm here to to not raise bynum here to to help bring the conversation to bring  of four for matters of discrimination as a whole it's not just about me it's about the unfair treatment in bias of people who come collectively to get work and have the power to diminish anyone's