MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
aware that metropolitan peer rules governing school years he had said global had the authority to take action on file ations own metropolitan troopers rules then he became a war sticker in conditions should have attracted attention and he also indicated that not only could you hear tony constable to remove the scooter from the floor if they refused you could have had it removed yourself says you're understand the record completely it's very clear they've admitted they had a duty to remove something if they've seen it and as you said just syphon they should have seen this that if there's ever going to be clear about testimony that they didn't see it was consistent with what he knows to be true and there was a mysterious disease or that hearing said there was no foundation for that testimony and if you look at the record i do not think there is any objection to the statute as they exist to place on that runway is not the province of the try a court you know but it certainly is not something that they should have a contribution judgments against benefits for the rest of his or right i remember that maybe he had two thirds of the average weekly wage in perm week plus future medical expenses whatever they might be there's no way of making that value of the trial fair to make that determination here or raises the prospect of of two respective different values being used then in a third party defendant situation i mean piracy when that determination a position in the litigation and that was similar at best has back to the question about the verdict forms already ability as any derivative of plaintiff's claim against the direct defendants that they are entitled to sue and the same arguments and was a read of the circumstances that my client and heat in his ruling did say that under the totality of circumstances he could not approve a good do is you have to say how you could start a new trial with g s at sixty five percent the plaintiff at thirty five percent there's nothing to allocate that's one hundred percent or more so the truth is that really is not considering the trial we don't really think there's any grounds for against each other if the
of property must be expressly stated in order to be given the facts and i submit that the restriction about putting a driveway roadway public street or case well essentially are not disputed have issues they both parties certainly have a different spin on the parties introduced to the evidence in this case the contracts to purchase the land in question parties also reduced in the evidence in this case the deeds which actually conveyed the property in question the significance of man is this  talk consistent with what is said by the individual member and in this case the motion to reset was made die for lack of the second and it was never reset and that's an issue that exists between the after after he'd already planted the subdivision gone to the earthquake county board then he closed on the transaction based upon he is use cannot be either a private or a gravel driveway it has to be a rude because it's had access to a three live center vision and access for their cars for their visitors get visitors and guests enter nexus for emergency purposes went ahead and started construction across like forty one even though he had no building permit and in fact a trial tonight did i even need a building permit even though it requested and the issue of gravel would be so forth between in the issue apparently that contention is no longer before this court from this from the plainest perspective from bales a subdivision homeowners association this is precisely the shoe that this court decided it sure w it's rare in my now seemingly longer and longer years of experience of the trial court that we can find a case that is almost and i think in this case on all fours to try a case too and that's state cases but i don't think those are relevant when you have a key selling point and a case to sign to the state of illinois and also supported by any additional case in the state of illinois from a district different district for the same purposes the defendant also case then the property is if his land line is landlocked is an issue between the defendant and the golf course in this country one that should be dealt with by them that's not the burden of the plaintiff in this case who question of the law of the building of the road across law forty one it is true that subsequent to that he continued work a lot where he was subsequently the court's order and we filed a petition that remains pending had the decision of this out police court again i need to answer really briefly only one or two the points raised by mr bone and then there is the issue as to whether or not we could still use ot be to get back to this  say that they have that we have constructed a roadway across our law be with our first requesting a building permit in violation of the regulations of beers leave home owners and then they say that we are in contempt because
going to tell me who he was going to meet at his destination how who was going to get in touch with those individuals and one of them was planning on returning home i would promise some of those questions might have been reasonable but the me for those reasons he was continuing to run through the computer program me his calls and do what the standard operating procedures are for a traffic stop during that time so there was no nothing to indicate that the to have the same result we had a case in this quarter where the bullies on the sit told people that they were free to go and they started walking down the highway and they arrested them for walking on the
in article truly section follow the constitution specifically delegates to the legislature the right to determine their residence for constitutes team for two so in time this article was inactive this is the case in which the supreme court first have occasion to address in toto question the reversed by the supreme court the supreme court did issue the pulling case on the part of the bill in case of the determine whether something is mandatory or directory of work of the specific language it seems to have it set up almost a values quite in the statutory scheme can you direct us to the language in that section that would indicate the section is mandatory otherwise no one seems to say the d fall position is that its director your are out basically disagree with you on that because the poor case does not us in any sense voter registration oh there's no question about that there is a ask me general policy pronouncement it seems to indicate that if that's not in this protest as to my to the specificity of the requirement of your residence for registration there is no provision or a case with sadness that if you change your position is that the that correctly done the results of this should be extrapolated to the county like the franklin county yes some so this is a twelve county circuit in you rely on paul essentially as to the degree of specificity strictness whatever of the standard can you statutory authority or cases already that would indicate that tuthill has been refined somewhat as far as  the degree of specificity of the man or even nature of the pronouncements that it made i pull and does focus on a different factual situation but it has  is to be some leeway so almost the integrity of the process is
his are in the museum and
the whole of life's joke to guess when you've done if you're in proper i who trouble about education is comes expenses i don't use that one i keep it oh that's why i'm we've got to have a talk i talk to you in the morning because morning so here i see you are drunk by drunk i'm sorry but you didn't go to have gone off not that levey all that stuff you talk to and then walking out on me i mean it's more than flesh and blood can stand
hold perhaps it's the most simple case that you're going to be deciding this week as far is i mean concerned there is one and only one issue properly before this court this file for the second nineteen each that was filed with certain filed within thirty months of the commission decision on the first one to me and if you look at section nineteen age it says that thirty first twenty three she had diagnosed her with that same condition that piece of deputy lead is of the right shoulder and recommended manipulation of the shoulder under general anesthesia which the claimant decline this that you know how things that may condition what is different what is different in her existence a bit because that was primarily died as a there was no opinion evidence presented in this case the only evidence worth of the medical records but the medical records we would argue ourself ok so the medical records which actually record testifying that almost anything she does almost anything she does causes pain which is a material intensification or material change from the five who has to say the shoulder pain is thirty five percent of them in so whole compared to forty two point five percent of the man who makes that decision that is between thirty five and forty two wor there's certainly a set of factors that is used by the commission especially at this time this was prior to shoulder more than ninety degrees on friday and i get a pain a certain level on monday and my pains a little more on friday is there a difference between my eliminates the most difficult problem and it's tempting to dissipate the progression of the claimants disability we were very concerned with the fact that the commission at that time in that first nine hundred eighty three can only look to t don't matter what i try to do if i'm going to reach something i can feel the pain immediately in my right shoulder her testimony is completely consistent from two thousand and four to two thousand and eight two thousand and twelve teacher the testimony is always been the constant pain no matter what i do in the constant pain that there's no change relative to the pain relative to the movement in her shoulders the ninety degrees of the inability to a doctor so to be on ninety degrees about pain that existed in two thousand and three long before the first two thousand and four hearing that was the same fine as fine is have never changed and then in two thousand and three that was from two thousand and three and that's what they've noted in their decision of two thousand and four so there has been absolutely no change in her condition between two thousand and four two thousand and eight and two thousand and two therefore you believe are sufficient evidence to support the
must be used to reduce the limits and the key word is the limits why we're like this i don't know we'd all like it in that manner we normally think in that case they're in a situation like this where the premium is stated for each vehicle and the coverage is stated that they would have no problem finding and the liability limits them well dearest does it make how we are the language within the policy but the second part of that is there in their policy where they is language that says that person has the limits for uninsured motorist insurance and then parent that eclipses include under insured motorist protection or but then it goes on to say uninsured motorists insurance limits of insured vehicles that is not familiar with these kind of policies might and that's the whole point of this is that all stating it is prepare a contract that has problems believe page fourteen of the policy just in the number three it does say if the accident involves the use of an under insured motor vehicle the limits to this coverage will be that's a different set i mean where does it say that gets sent off
i would like in all of this is the job of a professional cemetery still miles down the road
am nor will it as long as i am privilege to be in this chair
and with that will move onto  speed up that process
reviewing the motion for summary judgment you know it's important to look at the statement of material facts and issues followed by the kristofferson which assists for her mindset at the time and a constant reassurance  to the summary judgment motion and ruling of the court that the court ruled on the basis of there being a bright line that the statute of limitations begins to run at the time that she met the party is relying on discovery she had to come forth with some real evidence that there was a factual dispute as to whether she suffered a wrongfully cause injury when she knew  comes i just have to say that i do agree that people don't pay their debts i pay taxes i don't necessarily agree with where it goes but money's going on and i don't see that this relevant in any  when he is saying to her she said he screamed at her during the hearings and she felt that she was no longer being represented by i think we've gone past just yes run from her in action for her sluggishness about looking into what was really going on if she thought something was really going up and she all the evidence that she thought something was
look here you got to come with me for you holding hands all right in this we're married yes i understand  hard choice for you to make send me back and your back ma'am why should i you will be the last one i if you have why that's an take it out for you with his pliers he's got a handy with things like that used to be a blacksmith oh no well then i'm afraid i thought it was funny wasn't scared before i here there are lots of french people in indiana yes we are all friends with us and i know you had a tough time and i hope it's all behind you when you get out to california i hope so and mad at me i'm not mad now well then don't be scared anymore we're moving to the post on the cover of night you'll be all right i'm all right now and that will not be afraid  about it stuck in fine shape we can travel all right if you want to but i'd rather wait a couple of days the ground still pretty funny ordinarily i would but i got to get these how brazen independents out here for the they ever find out the soldiers is gone they want to band together and one big war party better leave while we are still scattered how do you know so much about it i was out there in the indian country about two months ago with an they want to know if they can buy our fire engines and make yesterday he only had eleven francs and he's been walking to doing things for calls you don't have to do that you want you to come over there and fix something gone wrong with our out how i'm going to fit into the picture you've got in your mind working right you even have a tablecloth and i'm not going around my neck like a baby i always been free and i don't know if i'd like a woman to tell me this here and that  got me so i can't even look at it with up the one the grabber in my arms that's why i'm running away from it so that i can beat it reformed you we need a talking about us you better go back we can't do no more you boy and she can't touch another place we went wrong she's all right and you're asking me to go but it's not the best thing for you but what are you going to do narang never mind about us that's funny you asking me to turn you down after the way you cared for me when i was with them to go on it wouldn't be the same anyhow i'd be awful lonesome right bakkies thinking about them and you but you will be free i've been thinking that over i'd rather eat with a napkin around my neck for the rest of my life when you marry me yes or no we must
it's like you i don't care i'm going to learn other things besides way i don't really get ahead of course you need to have everybody wear the hat to school all she's going to high school on the blackboard work it out and then sign your name t ime's up sign your names in the back you s what i haven't done without you i suppose you know that was the tax money force or the tax collectors don't get broken hearts when they have to wait a minute  not at all he's worth you know that creams in the cooler you can do it the morning i can i'm going to come out didn't you get enough today now i could find and your best  i want to talk to you mean he's a mighty nice girl that i couldn't they were really worth much more thank you for the college f she's kind of fussy about her but what's the problem now know i thought i thought you changed are you going to change i'm not going to  i think you can do without that might as well kno that's too bad why not let me things to people sometimes i think we'd better go well known  honestly don't you love me a little bit
place upside down all of that you don't even know if she's around and i i promise you all right soon i don't honey you have to have your own ring and a lot of it well there were two to one against  somebody is and we're going to put a stop to it them out of business this country was made for men they can stand on their own feet if you want to survive you have to fight there can't be a sentimentalist and you can't play lord and master you forget it took a little man as well as the big one to make this country what it is like this i wouldn't mind being in their boots were you could be your push folks off the land where they have the droid the by leo i sent them packing i told bryce he wasn't trampling on me rogers got a lot of nerve a texas longhorn is good enough for your outfit we decided that improving our stock might encourage our neighbors to do likewise eating ranchers should set an example how is the cattle industry in texas going to grow it will be growing before you were born and  our company proposes to build a line from abilene to rid of it and we are obtaining rights of way so far everyone along the route has given us permission but we must have yours to complete the final link sorry mr mccabe but for my part no railroad is going through our property where all you can think of yourself all the time bryan this will benefit the whole community make room for the great cattle sent out maybe and it will also bring in a tidal wave of sadness for you i know it  you can never be placed at dowling think it all decent people holding where you've been all this time me right then thought about that what can you do about th pulling your more then my son died keeping him off this place and as long as i live they gonna stay off if i have to turn texas upside down pull this house apart brick by brick and what do you care what your property you got your check i go on before they show up it's all rights i'll go it's for fifteen years i've been sticking my neck out beside yours it's through damn i guess this is the end of our empire but i've got a notion you're starting to build something and
yes i suppose i should like you need a friend tell me what's wrong is my husband ronnie  i don't care how long it takes know that's all i really am fine but i have to go you don't know what it's like to meet someone in a pub and you tell him you're falling clock and i look at you like and nothing now we have a slight problem i love we might have to rely o when you came here for me like everything we always dream
sure i mean it otherwise is just a preponderance of the evidence that the trial court would determine is if this is a child of five but under the paternity act there is created a presumption that must be overcome by clear and convincing evidence
but that is your greatest talent  time the harbor the power plant is completely demolished we're going to set up an emergency the army's technology is helpless before this creature one of our weapons appears strong enough to kill him general emergency po general you must find a way to rescue our children yes please try everything i know how you must be doing your best at the present time there's no way we can get them safely returned there's one of two choices we must make have you taken all mankind is concerned in this decision we've put the problem up to the united nations and they've called an emergency meeting whatever they decide that's what we'll do onerous at any minute  wait a minute you both
out of the blue when there was no discussion about mental illness or anything at all oh information about mental illness in this case i will say to you that the information on mental illness was not inserted by the prosecutor it was insisted on for good reason we're worried about our did the defendant kill her daughter she did we're not even worried about how did it happen because they didn't put her say he's mentally ill she her behavior was reckless not intentional and that's what he was focusing on ashley and the jury to return a verdict  that's the only time it's given the committee for the political moves following a case that said it was there to not get it when the jury asked for it then you know put what the defendant's mental state was and were certainly a defendant has a right to have the jury instructed on their theory of defense it's nowhere to refuse an instruction on that kept them from both you know the real issue
se services were in fact in that time frame living paycheck to paycheck and on their credit cards in nineteen ninety four or ma and he comes on and tries to corroborate the fact that he received these check and he was going to deliver it to jim but then finally when his own counsel question am on the  that this in fact totally unbelievable evidence in view of the real truth of the matter which we proved through plaintiff's exhibit sixteen and sixty three and what's also interesting from the record is nowhere in the where does it show up but there was never a check for three hundred dollars written down you caught the services don't have a payment in ninety five we don't have a payment in ninety six and we are in two thousand because none of those checks were actually cash believes that the u c c tells us that payment is made once that check had been honored  check was never positive let alone was it on or so we have no payments in this case and therefore that provision of two of the six that says that these gentlemen patients can be extended and ten years from the date of the payment is was for and that that that was judge for finding is that there was inadequate proof for the  created and judge for in his ruling on the request for reconsideration set forth the criteria he said there's insufficient evidence there and therefore the plaintiff has failed to saw i'm not sure what parole evidence was kept out i think in this case basically boils down to the plaintiff's helen believing that there are versions right and that how can somebody disagree with their version well we have judges judges rule is to decide after hearing all the administration all the credibility what makes sense and what doesn't make sense and that doesn't mean that we have an area here on appeal simply means  sometimes it's not so good in this case we argue that it's an at will because it predates the more current version of true of six it's clear that when it's the statute was created that there was a requirement that thousand and six is lost it was not file until december eighteenth of two thousand and six is time are under the most generous version which would be to acknowledge that checks tendered were actual pains i don't think that's the evidence in this case that he did not have a specific discussion on that point within the service but instead he understood because there were alleged financial problems that it may not be in the best interest of mine to cash those chaps however i don't believe there