parent to scram and that went to the genesis in order by the court to prohibit the unsupervised visitation because of that and then that court just simply because this case is probably before this court jurisdiction but having said that go ahead to be sure but i do think that i'm the face of  or not i don't know what affirmative obligation the party that you know responded would have to correct the board order would not necessarily serve our purposes but having said that i don't know that that would be impossible  the definition of insurers environment if you have a person who was found to be unfair and was ordered not to have any contact with a child unless it was supervised by the appropriate  jurors environment if you allow the children to be in the presence of someone who can to be dangerous or has other problems even though the child at the time is not  you physically but because of the potential i mean there are cases dealing with their own child to be in the presence of a known person used to it's domestic violence all the time on the mother and just being an even though child herself or himself was not battered by the by the person so there are all those cases right there but helping out here what happened to the father after this in anything in here about my prior being in our child that was harmful to the drug it was just the context of that context being sure that there was somebody responsible to supervise that in this in the case of the product or if you will that it should be a court then we have the two instances in springfield on may twenty eighth or something so with may twenty fifth within two weeks of the court order where she was going to have supervised visitation where the car is stopped for whatever reason and the father mother and the child and then we have the time when she told her later in may that she was seeing the child outside of the visitation and then we have the grandmother coming home to check on her great granddaughter and finding mother apparently was found this decision on it because she had at that time on addressed that will help and or domestic violence issues and he considered that at the time he was considering what effect you know by the rest of the order with the fact that she was having  visitation outside of the supervised visitation had on the environment of the child so that the judge did not say you have violated the order and therefore i am finding that the child environment is that like that in fact the judge would have all the evidence that came in  have all the rights and benefits and responsibilities to his child and you know if that i guess maybe that's why you know why this is something that should be the nature of  having her two one hour week visitations with the child supervised by a caseworker or somebody and we know that in a while and all of this is going on and there is no record that needs to be something else or you know we cannot do this you know this is a dangerous situation because because the porter sent a task to be to this injurious environment with our clergy for us with regard to the previous order you we know we don't have and so we don't have like the parameters that's the point everybody's asking about what are the there are cases like that but many times it's a contemptuous and that's what everybody's either or both avenues could have been pursued in this case the people felt that it that it created injuries environment for the child  you know it might have been a lot easier to not have that or protectionism that even if he was driving to get off or whatever they want to beat it doesn't necessarily mean that it was a bad thing  bed it may be a bad example of what to eat where to eat it but it's now it hardly proves neglect the mother's honesty about disclosing that she was having business with the business outside of the designated bottom line is that unless this is a new case we're looking at this case pressure we don't say doesn't get to go back and say all the evidence of the previous case we get to throw into this case that's what they're trying to do but things change at that petition was filed a long time