when i checked the record bernie did not plead guilty or any gonzalez did not plead guilty to a truck conspiracy he only played guilty to the first count which was a civil rights conspiracy no one as far as i can tell from the but by the government's theory anybody who happened to have a phone call that day with any of these should have been convicted as well well i just wanted to correct what you know i mean wasn't and i don't know that i don't know which phone calls in particular i'm your honor frank to according to the evidence misato had no knowledge that there was going to be any on lawful transfer of drugs from ag and teach to the target deal she didn't have that knowledge she believed at all times that aquino gave the confidential informant the drugs and if believes that's what he says he believes in no time did he have any information to contradict that i know that in response to my brief the government says well you know  quote bernie gonzales his testimony when you were arrested mr aquino on that day was it your belief that the forty five these were provided i mistook you know to have all the confidential informant correct and you had no other encouraged bernie to lie about when the cocaine was attacked but she didn't have any knowledge which was required that the cocaine came from anyone else other than he know but he doesn't say he doesn't tie that he doesn't say specifically i got i have fifty grams he gets in the car and he tells everybody it came from and he you know if you believe him that him from tito then yes but it's stay with geoffrey second did he say when it came from them in relationship to the phone conversation with plaza telling him to buy fifty he'll know your on that's had this charade twice in february and in july i had the surveyed where i pretended that i got him from you know and i never told any police officer i had gotten from you know i don't know there's just nothing there to show that have knowledge there's also nothing there to show that she voluntarily unknowingly agreed to such conspiracy but the government points to in response to that is well she encouraged bernie to lie this is true and this was sufficient to make out a violation of the due process rights because she said you know even though we know it didn't come from him at his house or from his person we know it came from him so you know let's just take the short cut unlawful but let's just take the short cut but that doesn't make out that she agrees to a conspiracy to have drugs transferred from law enforcement to the target dealers and i think that if you when you look at all the evidence that was there there's just nothing there to show you her knowledge more that she voluntarily agreed to it i think any other questions if you carlos aquino and roberto gonzalez and in this case the norma centers had knowledge of the conspiracy we see that knowledge from the conversation that was had in the patrol car that and therefore the drugs were not directly obtained from kino during the conversation back at the police station after aquino was arrested burning inside your burning gonzalez i informed her that you know he asks what would we do with the distribution case but she doesn't actually it conspiracy doesn't require an over x and she didn't actually have to have possession of the drugs prior to the field bill she had to agree to join  conspiracy whose purpose was distribution of drug use yes what evidence is there that she going to conspiracy whose purpose was distribution for well i would submit that she joined the conspiracy late all activities of the conspiracy prior to her involvement of the conspiracy which includes the actions of providing the confidential informant with drugs plant on a keno and  drugs i'm sorry say that again they do we get the drugs they suppose all they did was claim they bought it from the guy and they didn't ok all right and she told the other officer to lie and she lied that's not a conspiracy to distribute drugs at the time of the final sale he arrives at the same time as as his other coconspirators he was an adjacent table to the table where the other main cast coke and negotiators were negotiating the final details of the deal and he mistrustful pointed out that in the government's briefing there is a statement that oh i guess it's bernie agent consolidate that was unambiguous lee demonstrated that he did not believe that aquino was the source of the drugs but she also pointed out that in the other case that we just heard argument in the government was taking the position that bernie along with lots of other people thought that aquino was the source of the drugs so i'm trying to review previously i don't have a recent recollection of details of the brief but i would say that at the time of the interview in the transcript i know the government consolidates what's the evidence that he unambiguously demonstrated that he didn't believe that aquino was the source of the drugs that that's really my question ok s if there's nothing for the rest of my brief thank you