MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
things to know also about natalie grossman her story her career she had been also recording already a couple of albums the first one is on fourteen that was produced with her father who made also the engineering work and participate  brilliant cast of players and she wrote most of the music for dalam and there are many they say many reviews nowadays you go to google as you go to her website now the agreement that come you will find a lot of information about these beautiful artists who  america around the world because she had been touring a lot in the last two years and now she is here in the q a bridge
because in rights for all the people that were involved in that he's we're all sitting at the same table and they can't do a deal and then after one of the curtains i think it was standard insurance or something  something that wasn't that they didn't know in my case  fifty five which would be a net payment of twelve thousand if you take the credit for whatever reason the iris was given the hundred thirty five thousand no claim refund was over third thought well if they get a credit how much do they pay how much they give back that's a part of it couldn't figure out because it wasn't reported in the butt records so when i wrote the i r s and credit from them and they relationship that is not the same as in rice but i don't see that you sure relationship are right in that he's mr rice girl represented insurance company and his client knew exactly what was going on all the and he's just as was that there's no attorney client relationship i was there i represented you you know it was happening and he actually that it was in the i think they're going to use a third party beneficiary of whatever deals me first is that there is no argument that the claim being made in its entirety regardless of the crop of the child was action is a claim against attorneys there is no argument that is a claim against i was attorneys that arises out of an act or omission of those attorneys in the performance of professional services that thing work that was was done by mr wagner partner in the firms for a while on the estates of the the allegations of complying you're not even dealing with the representation there you're dealing with a post representation here it different point of any benefit to suggest that the error somehow continues until the refund would no longer be or any suggestion and in fact of record that the defendants assuming all the allegations about the creditor true i don't mean to suggest either way but assuming it's all true purpose of the motion as we must there's nothing in the record nothing of the allegations of the complaint that suggest that the fine is overdue that there was a credit to the client never knew that they had quote failed to do something or committed no crime just never a suggestion or allegation of intent in fact in the liability of a defendant after a certain passages or the time regardless of the knowledge of the potential plaintiff and cuts off the right of action whether it's a right of action or cause of action irrespective of injury potential plaintiffs knowledge of the cause of action or the right of action it don't pay attention even to the specific injury it's the acts of arising out of the representation that can create  who's up asian is it to communicate with plan c ter is when you go into an attorney's office for the state receive probate she basically most people put your but their hands in the hands of the attorney saying do what you gotta do orcutt through this case and to both fine gentlemen but i think i have a lot of patients to recover that money to the charities and i might add just that's not the record but there's a charities in the big little family had eight daughters
supply or for whom the witness is purchase now if you look at all the documents here beginning with the lease itself converso or is a debt of five as the seller of the equipment time well fourteen weeks they did nothing to to contradict that at any point in time now that's not to say that that interracial brochure four weeks or so but they did expect within a reasonable time the manufacturers that they'd have to in six weeks the sale of the brochures at fourteen but you know it was obvious that the or might be problems in delivery it was certainly forseeable for them to protect itself neck if this segues somewhat into my previous argument they certainly had opportunity to protect themselves from the situation they find th
because i think this on this process was going on for two or three or four years before you sought to judicial relief i would disagree with that  but at least there was some agreement that you were going to assist them such that if you saw what was going on and they were looking at your property did you say anything like you know maybe the permit you're talking about should be on your property  he makes sure he's going to be surprised by four million dollars or actually more than it was six or seven million dollars and they have to make six or seven million dollars that is oh guess what i'm not saying that's what happened in this case that's the essence of this case sent to the city of st charles or their agents to use a highway right of way that is part of random road and i think you know if you look at state as you did is unequivocal that it's clear the county in order for the city to use the county highway right away that they had to have the permission of the underlying party order and the only question that comes into my mind which relates to that assertion is what commission what right if any were any did the county retained in these premises if you look at the easement documents self it's clear it's that the contrast objected to anyone using his property this is five months before they actually used the property if legend is going to be applicable here then what the court would have to find no other corals ever found is a legend begins to wrong as
in montgomery county that too was he talking about this series of cases that say a motion to reconsider does not toll follow titian's relief to appeal or was he saying there's no such thing as a motion to reconsider in any case
else but matt would like to check that out and we also found out that we thought allen had a deadline of having to have everything on the twenty first and matt says no she can she's got two extra weeks for it to provide supporting documentation out that the training that we're members were exposed to really had an impact on people that went through it from the perspective of the average citizen who really don't understand what  to keep a tight record for three months hundred eighty days left of that time record see their days are computed by formula from them and then that is the way they involved with the hearing this a valve would be the first person to sign up to speak at the public hearing so they could explain in more detail what the public hearing is about and so on suggesting that we made money go back to that on you know i think we've done noticed that in some of the public hearings you know people get up and criticize about something that's totally unrelated to what could be you know what we've passed and so just wanted to throw that
was relevant to show a pattern of abuse against his daughter then eventually call needed in the shaken or down they say he said that but you know that as stated in the opinion right but that that's not some kind of finding that the have thirty seven pages which university the other point the other point of the argument is that if you take away the shaken baby syndrome evidence in this case it was some force trauma was  died from you know a strike to the head and the defendant said well i think this child fell short flight of stairs for sure and the evidence at that time was this injury could have resulted from that short of a fall and this new evidence that's being sought to be admitted doesn't just deal with how shaken baby syndrome you know can look like blunt force trauma but in fact is saying that those same short flight of stairs or falls can kill the child and sometimes this is what we always start with shaken baby syndrome looks just like the short fall from the sta it for the purposes of the argument about the i guess for lack of a better trick the new evidence of the new body of evidence out there expert testimony or something out there the argument is that it wasn't placed into the post conviction to sion and when you're saying in there there's no obligation to do that and that the
the first that this is something which the debtor have a right to see that requires preservation i don't see anything particularly an equitable prior to
the legislature says well here's the new legislation but you've already entered into a contract you get it change it you get to change it going forward with a conflict with the customer that you made th
um em for
oh this is the oldest member of the band is right behind me right here over here anyway no he's not yours he's actually the young is he just the other day very cool sometimes because i can always tell my grandkids you're going to look like this you have
that they were told to not
to touch on the question of jurisdiction just to make sure that the courts comfortable i know there were some questions raised in the breeze and confusion perhaps there is no question i had in my mind as far as this court's jurisdiction it's it's proper under three or four facts so yeah it's my belief and i see no reason to believe otherwise that bella's could have compelled the production of those facts whether by testimony or affidavit and based on that and based on the fact that chris wallace also made it very clear that he had every intent to do everything he needed to to defend against this assertion of privilege the fact that even if even if we took the  from from the fact that mr mcdonald admitted to truthful facts i think in this court has further questions regarding the affidavit issue i think that the trial court's judgment on that point was spot on it would have made no sense at the time that that my are people with drew or prior to that to answer the initial complaint when the homeowners association had already filed a there's no reason to think that simply if the defendant has had swooped in and gotten this transfer in within that that three week train before the post amended point that they were to just abandon all these other claims that they s he was damaged by this these tenants because he was attempting to sell his property at the time and somehow this prevented him from selling his property or impaired again that's not that's not
will be on cable i know
with a lot of things going on no trial courts fine thank you very much
presented material primary issue that i think courts presented with here with regard to this double bass first patient and is whether or not this court or any other board would hold as a matter of law but the standard to do they have a duty to install eighty two but to base it right bag it is just you know this is like any other rule or regulation or voluntary associations guidelines is something that can be put into evidence of trier of fact to consider and there right well i think this i mean i do think you're overstating but what has to happen here was i think it assumes that first of all this rules the safety related rule injecting them behind now we do not see that there is an obligation to as a holder of a base for softball diamond to have to back first baseman figuration but assuming take care correct or wasn't kind of but if we keep talking about an informal leave i mean it's not the kind of thing where one side or who has the responsibility of going out first and set up a field this was all done
of course and
on december sixth so but we are going to see a couple of a couple of panthers seniors that have been more intricately involved with the scope to help in the panthers to their undefeated records even to get the start today crosses the fifteen are on their own seventeen substitutions sixty eight symbolic body comes
answer to that question never think that there's no excuse for not delving into this twenty five years ago twenty years ago ten years ago there's no reason to not
and another case in charges are filed later the entire atmosphere of later when this is speedy trial term in your opinion begin to run the prejudice that we would see i think would be like a witness who no longer remembers the facts because of the delay rate right there and there would be one more witness who can't be located or who dies or becomes unavailable that kind of thing whe order my memory serves it was a what i'm getting at is there are forms that have different findings or declarations or to present just twenty or whether a box was checked would indicate whether or
that we've already announced the case so you may proceed to the worker dead man's actor we have him to see so that you have these live complications and then she has the asia so let's presume that we don't know who the shooter we have no idea who the shooter was but we have the same scenario that without showing them to be able to hear you just have to show the it that the occurence didn't have any scans one way or the other in town are great and once you do that you believe few days later and the us supreme court's it was obvious that there was a deliberate intent to jump but there it was an accident and that the injury occurred and
decision and as i say you know a certain to put her requests especially her so there are options there and i think we have to consider the fact that his attorney should be given the option to consider what's best for his clients a little hard to say that that you're not dangerous to others where two weeks earlier you attack somebody so i think we do have to give some some leeway and say you  but his attorney chose not to use that you're saying that he agreed to this well he he agreed that there's a kind of a hobson's choice though he has a right to a jury trial and was he exercised that i think we have a situation here where everybody agreed to this no one would know any prejudice and as i say it may have worked to his advantage in this case he had i have to kind of go on let's go over to say well that sounds a little six minute sounds worse than forty day but but still i think i mean again going back to speedy trial medication he could get or something like that he has had others in contact with this man for over twenty years he has been committed to our prison that time so he's not going to know didn't a hundred eighty days from the date that the order was entered so he was not given any credit for that period of time where he was involuntarily committed waiting for the story trial so it's on like a criminal case for they get credit for time
that appropriate premiums that encourages exist commensurate with the risk that the least employees to repay and the reason why i say think that's more that it's clearly to them the more important focus and clear focus of th lower than what they should be if they're paying great cemented with an office worker when their employees are in factories with molding machines with under guard multiple moving legs as as was the case here that another mr bruce essentially lost his moon mr mason essentially lost his hand this machine would be absolutely no different between never threw the first place and have a registration been revoked from from direct sure that it's a love playing field and to make sure that this isn't happening here because all the be there is a risk that that if if one you know if the employment leasing company act cars out of temporary out arrangement as aides have a business that's not subject to the registration morning by the evidence doesn't show that that one way or the other whether westpac falls into that i think it's important to point out that this important to note though that when you are providing teeth to stack you you have to find some support for where that he is in this particular case position even references exclusive  think is inappropriate and you know as we all know when the workers compensation structure was put in place there was essentially absolute liability for the boiler and no fault system and exchange and it's expressly said and it's clear i mean i think all his flaws in it that the point is what was the intent of the parties and kind of partners cannot be made more clear by that by that initial statement of what this whole thing was about
and it's it's our position that the trial for in granting summary judgment denying the insurance coverage to the a pollution in do so in the trial or fail to consider the totality of the allegations in the pleading and also specifically considered to be cool traditional environmental pollution and with those two errors then granted summary judgment to peak in the nine insurance coverage to yeah well looking at the underlying complaint which the trial for his has to do in the conference that quite determined whether there's a duty to defend her insurance coverage an allegation that there was this far into the environment is significant because it leads to the question of what is the environment the ultimate question of whether there's insurance coverage on her of pollution exclusion terms asked with terms go traditional environmental pollution only exist basically case law it only exists where there is a dispersion outside of the building into the air or water or s insurance industry is given the opportunity to disclaim any obligation despite the fact that they knew the former son was in this business they agreed to provide insurance they took premium but solution is basically allow the exclusion to become the rule and no longer an exclusion because in any situation where there's an even an internal small amount of release the was not considered pollution by the state therefore could it be considered pollution by the insurer well this is my only opportunity to address this court and i will tell the score and i'm sure for sure from that case it is it's  outside exposure outside of the promise and that leads to the grief were bottle of the notion that because they were in two different spaces in the same building somehow it becomes outside
touchdown of last runway it brought the total of airlift flights to the city to one hundred thousand to express their profound gratitude representatives of the people of berlin are present to present gifts to the crew of number thirty seven the honor i don't know how how much roger ten years old representing the children of berlin will make history then taken to copilot lieutenant alfred freiburg or st petersburg florida we were part of the twenty third how do you like your job oh it's a wonderful opportunity and i'm grateful for you you really learn your job on this operation to give you the feeling of when they said they don't live in the city and the kids had it so i'm a lot of other people in this town but he didn't want to talk about it i made her tell him i know you just have to drag it out of these poor people i feel so sorry for him every sunday at four o'clock and come here intermittently open starting at fourteen hundred hours it is important to land every time we can put your lives are more important you will make your g c approach and when you are let down to your minimum if you do not have sufficient ah
arrives in the german capital for an emergency meeting as does the french military commander general kayani later america's general lucius the clay speaking for the western allies announces their decision we have a right to be in berlin and we  as if you when i was getting married and now know how much roger ten years old representing the children of berlin will make his present case into copilot lieutenant alfred freiburg of st petersburg florida laugh maybe some very lucky my plane catches on fire you know they might give me a couple hours i'm lucky like that they get it in half i haven't got a phone but i coming in to see a friend of mine and the kind of that's a very good thing for unemployment  axis look the next time you're in the russian sector do me a favor which is a get me a copy of an anti russian book written by a russian living in russia printed in russian and still here by the russian government so let me give you a month's salary you get the  not have sufficient visibility pull up and come back actually conditions to take off position here are not good proceed cautiously or is your time back in twenty second four engine on fire will make an emergency landing on the ways to seven left into the was standby
rule that issue again we're talking  that the trial court essentially overstepped their bounds by ensuring that order however once entered it require both parties to comply argued that the order was not authorized by the station i agree with that taking an affirmative step to constantly approach that individual or to to interact with it if you whether it's in the you were the you're driving down the street or getting your mail i i would i would argue your or your difficult to find difficult to convince them or for the judge to convince them of something and when you do nothing you have no choice but to proceed because you just don't you don't have any choice but to proceed so surrounding circumstances that were brought their best no i don't think that the testimony of the of the respondent rebutted anything the these these people have to come out of their home occasionally they have to get in their cars they have to go off they did that