weeks of trial time and a full complement of apolo briefs and after looking at all the bad and got a quote from mark twain came to mind that was if i had more time i would have written last time with that in mind i will try to keep my comments to trust and subtle now what is the difference between these two lines of cases the difference is in the whole case there was a specific expert testimony indicating that the framework oh what information the jury decided that doctors were not able with the information that they had when they were able to finally make a diagnosis i did not support a finding of medical malpractise now the and bilateral numbness of the legs so i would submit that unless that information was available to the physical therapists or the nurses prior to twenty eight there is no way that the jury verdict in favor plaintiffs against the hospital can can stand it must be reversed and judge issued for corrina now  information the experts for the plaintiff said that the nurses and the physical therapist should have communicated there are two theories one that they should've duplicated the material that they wrote down in their reports in oral format sh spoken directly to the physicians however dr mouth said i had all the information i need to make this diagnosis i don't blame anything that the nurses did i don't blame anything the physical therapist did i had enough information i did my own examinations and i followed the standard of care and that diagnosis wasn't billable until twenty  directions every day and there wasn't and nothing was reported as to the existence of any sensory problems additionally story i don't kno conduct of hospital nurses affected his decision making ability second the court says a plaintiff will always be free to present expert testimony as to what a reasonably qualified physician would do with the undisclosed information and whether the failure to disclose the information was a proximate cause of the pain just injury in her to discredit a doctor's assertion the nurses omission did not affect his decision making question does that testimony appear in this case no testimony of the family starts with the twenty third twenty fourth twenty fifth twenty six twenty seven and even to the twenty eight and this is what the record will show that there was pain to such an extent it was holding on to his radios in his bed there was we assume the lower extremities evidenced by falling down two or three different occasions he was crying with pain he was dropping step further dr long uses nurses since he's testimony to produce an opinion that the nurses piling she's of the standard care is approximate cause  been exercising due care they would have done two things if they had acted reasonably they would have done as a digital exam which would have indicated that there was an abnormal illogical first of all consider the testimony of the family by the way one contradicted not her nurse testifying not one person in the lead courtroom in said that the what did malik actually say i have to admit that the record is replete with testimony from dr miller and i admit it was inconsistent contradictory depending on who the question neurological compromise are not expected to be diagnosed or treated by others especially this this is this is dr mary sameness it would be helpful if these neurological complications are no the testimony of his questioning by his home his own lawyer his own lawyer asked that question which for whatever reason that when relevant to her these i don't know confirm what the family's observations were in their concerns as to what they saw keep this in mind but keep in mind that this is in the pockets of the doctor who has who has written reasonable those that needed jury has to accept that testimony in the face of what they've heard from the parents or from the from the family that was undisputed with wouldn't  parents were a doctor says i had all the information i needed that reason the hospital is off the hook i can't believe that and the reason i say that is each is each one of those cases are fa to the hospital he called ten o'clock at night to find out what was going on there was a very cruel active approach between the doctor and the nurses and you to testify that our expert was was contrary so the way we have here is all of these things are facts if i might suggest to the court decided by the jury in favor of here today the man will be taken under