only for cases in which they become aware of the status title nine problems when in a context that they control they deliberately fail to address the situation and the plan they have control over him back when it's a known harassment occurred western your honor is a university have control over the harasser and in the context of the harassment quite honestly thought about the situation where the where the university no longer has control over the harasser at time of the incident but i think that over the situation in which the bomb exploded this then no harassment in those kind of cases happened after the time that they were requested to act university responsible for being deliberately indifferent to all the harassed you can take out the were known that the point is they're talking about the harassment that the university was deliberately indifferent hypothetical and that is that the university is on notice because of what happened to student a and to miss de groot of mr bradford's behavior and his risk to other other students and let's change the facts of this case so that in my head hypothetical case at the time where ms brown is being assaulted she's in another dorm on campus does she have a honor because you can say yes or no or you can say i don't want to say but i'm asking you does she have a cause of action not whether she has a stronger another question then follows from that we are told in the record that had the football coach or the football team people been alerted to mr bradford conduct they would have terminated his ability assaults on student day and on the root we have undisputed evidence from the football before that had we known as he would not have been off campus but that goes to the actual knowledge argument you're out of your honor because the coaches didn't know about bradford's alleged misconduct well of course and the reason they didn't know is that the other people in the university who did know it didn't tell him and i haven't and i was summoned for the moment that the other end of in the other officials the university who didn't know violated their duty i'm just assuming that and you can contest that if you like for the moment i'm assuming that then that they had an obligation to report that to the football team had the her they gave or the information about the resources that were available to her but still they refused to proceed with a code of conduct violation or complaint so there wasn't  they could have told him you're not allowed to live off campus housing anymore if they have the ability to control whether he could be an off campus housing and why is it appropriate to view the off campus housing  could have told him to come back on campus but that control over that student does not transform that control into context into the control over the context of the harassment there there is a step temper conk one for the chill of the harasser and one over control over the harassment so just because the culture is could have done something had they known that doesn't mean that that the context control over the context which i gather is not quite the same maybe as control over the place so what was the point of have to show to establish that kind of control she has to establish that the university could control  the university or the school had actual knowledge of actual knowledge is a separate element in addition to the substantial control element bronx of interest left brown's interpretation will conflate the actual knowledge requirement s can you elaborate a little bit on that i'm not sure i fully understood where you do assume there have to be connection between the harassment and the school's operations because in on the degree of control that over the harasser and over the environment or the operations or the activities that the harassing actually occurs it standard of that level of generality i'm not sure that harassment so and davis is and that is a nice tidy easy case i mean we just have just episode after episode after episode in which those young man is tormenting this young girl sexually i mean this is the the real that was back to the finish to contact me if they don't have great can troll over what happens in the house as there is not on campus but they do have direct control over the student in many ways the ones run including the ability to tell him you can't make sense that your schools will be all buyable for the actions of somebody a person who they didn't have authority to control but what why is it important that the reliability only when the school has control over the context so why is that an what specifically laid out by my davis when it's laid out the contours for us appear on here harass killed my client and was arrested and sent to jail