MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
this is a film about defeat german victory and german peril the russian people turn for leadership to their friends alexander time the russian people under the regime of assad were not only fighting german g perhaps russia itself can provide the answer there it is one third of the earth for reaching from east to west nearly halfway around the world southward from the north pole to the borders of india one ninety three million people modern civilization where the old russian crops but still compete with the modern limousine scientists or type of musicians of what they do or where they live they all have one thing in common right size the largest country in the world raw materials unlimited manpower one hundred ninety three million these are the three reasons why every co because we have seen germany spirit of aggression was handed down from generation to generation i'm now in hitler's germany the dream with world conquest of such a dream that can be only one answer elect security so with this objective in one thousand nine hundred thirty four the soviet union joined the league of nations again and again before the league its representatives urged binding agreements to support by collective act bargaining compromise but while some members of the league were pleading vainly for the use of collective force to stop aggression the world saw other members germany italy japan withdraw from the lead to and hitler wanted those from peers in the hands of german generals bug area doesn't have a russian front here but it did have face bases on the black sea bases for german submarines to prey on stepping by the spring of one hundred forty one the reactionary governments of hungary under the dictatorship of admiral forcing a rumania governed by a young thing michael was only a tool in the hands same german army came up against a country that did not submit despite the fact that hitler's army swept deeper and deeper into the soviet union and by october the fifteenth practically within the straddles of the again despite the fact that by december five hundred thousand square miles of russian territory an area equal to the entire middle western united states opponents of the invaders yes despite be driven deep into the enemy territory to hook up with another spearhead driven through the media in the form of them would be possible the germans planned in every campaign to seek a decisive each house room by room the russians knew their cities would be demolished but their objective was not to save city but to describe german a high price to pay for a copy of mine so the germans were forced out of their armored but people win wars and i'm afraid of june twenty second when the russian people first learned of the invasion of their country their grim faces told of their determination
different way to have that opportunity so we bought together and begin in the neighborhood father of the son and of the only spirit and then i have a new father we come before you this morning thanking appraising you for the love that you share with us day by day that we thank you for this police department that serves the county of maui we ask father that your blessings will be up on each and every one of our officers today we ask especially for your love and care to be there with the leadership of our police department with our chief  c s we ask father that each and every one of you with that if we will that you would bless each and every one of them keep them in your loving care whether we pray today that you would guide and direct the police commissioners today take on the concerns of this county continue to walk with him with your love and care to me as father for your protection for our police officers throughout our country we know that there are a lot of emotions that are going on in their communities we ask father for the outpouring of your spirit of bone each and every one of them that keep them safe as they do their work continue to keep them police officer that they may take good decisions for our community we will give you the honor of the praise and the glory i pray in jesus name  correspondence in the next i don't choose report thing spirits
thirty year medical student on a nd day in the operating room you have now some reason to be a little bit more concerned than you would ordinarily which was i think my question which is which is the question i have in this case you're that's true so isn't it ensures the province of the jury to determine whether the statement that was written was intentional or inadvertent no because the testimony was not that it was in the i don't know i don't know he's not he was given every opportunity to say you know for god's sake it was inadvertent he didn't do it i know that but that's my question that was my st question comes from when you came out is so you have it before we get there because that does in part relate when in trial wasn't it wasn't the emphasis though on the actual improper intubation as opposed to the the hospital so no no i don't think the hospital can be with certainly there was never any suggestion made in the face of the office who were responsible and again the person who's responsible for supervising  of the way she ate that she disregarded her illness and ate there was there was a cousin it's an ounce of there was testimony about you know she was sent home and you know she might have been normal for home you know what you sent home and she couldn't she is that she had you know she was giving those decision structures or obligations i mean she was sent home they didn't know that they didn't know they had a problem because dr soni didn't know what obviously yes i mean if it was a mistake or interpretation or be a communication discourse i mean that happens to be so but if somebody intentionally falsify so then yes so clearly saying if someone more i know and i just how can it be that a mistake when you were otherwise occupied outside of your job is not negligence are suffering for free my cheese didn't she still have pain that was not necessarily related to the surgical areas her throat her that's not where she had surgery but that was and make those prints i don't remember basically what it would comes down to is this dr best if you want to digress is now a doctor could not be independently liable for medical negligence professional negligence because he was not
the principal question in this particular matter is whether or not the defendant had a duty of the court ruled in found that based upon the fact that the plaintiff had equal knowledge as he described it of the potential the extent of the duty and i think part of what what the ruling was in this particular case is you have a duty to warn individuals coming upon your premises of known hazards hazards that you know about that they may not know about and the court here rule in different locations because she had been at the home and over asians over the previous year she had been dating with a found it at the time and she had been in the home but whether or not she's aware of the dog dropping bones versus whether or not these bones constitute a hazard is where i think factually the case changes here in this particular case i believe that the testimony was is that the defendant indicated when he occasions in here and we have no evidence whatsoever of the plaintiff that ever encountered these bones as a hazard other than just picking them up and putting them away as she was cleaning the house the court also found that as a result of this knowledge of the plane of the fact that she had been there before that she had just as much she had equal footing she knew about this particular hazard once a duty is a stamp lish the other arguments in the case turned upon whether or not this was an open obvious hazard and whether any of the exceptions there their own would kick in and that what i would respectfully submit as those whether or not the distraction exception is a but of all in this particular matter were deliberate or found for that matter something that should be left for a jury to decide instances pick up the bones and not appreciate the risk but fortunately under the premises liability act we have an objective standard is not really really what she appreciated but  perpendicular she is eating everything she described to the dog comes through she's eating the dog is in front of her with her head head here in her testimony to the plan of testing one that dog s will she would have seen the bomb my crime who is who here has no idea that the phone is there now keep in mind during the course of the evening while the watching will orgy they had gone back and forth to make the spaghetti so the bo where the mother the daughter is at her parents home studying and her mother is guarding him there's mile on the steps leading into the home she tells  her gardening in this open an obvious she slips on the mike and she raises the distractions here in the distraction was that she lost vocals she just simply lost focus because she was she was so worried about studies and finals
y all right you rushed before the board but we think not only was the board wrong but we had by direct the board ordered the agency to reinstate the employee with the appropriate that painted for it so that discussing earlier i think with respect to maybe your options here or close but if it turns out to be the law not only has two cases in which the court declares the person the prevailing party but also the court does something that results ultimately in the party prevailing albeit before the board if that turns out to be what we were in this case i was just saying that the consequence of that is that no one can ever get peace for work in the court in such a case always thing thing aside whether you've got a problem in this particular case but are you saying that you just have to send to petitions somebody who knew the outcome of this case if it turns out to be against you would file at the same time with both authority that nonetheless we would not have authority to grant peach who are gone before us do you think that's so and  exact same outcome the exact same interest of justice question under the exact same case yet the court could come out different but each is a different statute it strikes me that the in terms of efficiency of trying to decide the very question i was referring to which is whether the take a number of hours hard that the billing rate was appropriate and with respect to the work on appeal it's has to be something else it puts it in the in the end of the interest of justice in this particular case or some other circumstances or other dressed and to thank you  that the court claims it's not appropriate authority because it hadn't directed at the direction of the just my personal ideas not that's not who decides it would that's just the party that decided that you were entitled to be put back in your better to everyone involved it would increase judicial efficiency even streamline the whole process if the court did identify a bright line test for these kinds of situations and i think that test could be consistent with the
would have any comment about my daughter's marriage to your son but you remember this your his mother not  paul interest and that gives us fifty one percent of the business in other words cathy we can fairly and now can i ask what you intend to do with it it's quite simple we intend to ma will wait a minute young lady i know it well we might be more room to put out don't worry we'll get along but do you think there's any chance of ever getting away from this place we can all ask you can record smells good day what do you celebrate i guess you didn't know about this but we forgot to tell y this work oh i'll have to rebuild it
don't want to be right if you want to go through life without speaking to your but do you think there's any chance of ever getting away from this we can all now have you can  record smells good hey what do you celebrate
if you now please stand and raise your right hand every dime unquote
ability to have a tissue review for such she would be given an opportunity to further her due process rights in this context my concern is that she never even got to step one she never even got to the aspect of the need to present any of these in least some right to be able to have some warning prior to her being able to sign these papers and we move look at this it's not black and white it is gray completely gray we're taking a situation and we have to look at it almost but in any case the court distress that there is also the ability for the individual to review with regards to what evidence can be used to put together their charges and in the present case before your honor's my client did not have the ability  to do any of that not only it was all the until she was able to get her family to contact an attorney at which point i was interning she contacted i was able to go over to deportation and i was able to talk with one of the officers to be able to find out what's me think it was the same day probably revenue that i was able to actually comes talk to her but that was my initial response i was not able to see her for national security purposes and wrong question with national security purposes you're trying to  bail out of the boat ok and on top of it all if they're not going to respond to a letter that i said within the stache to a framework to be able to respond to the i eighty five one stated there were issues with regard to the evidence that they were relying upon with regard to the issu
ceremony resolution for telling an american heritage m recall some of them had a committee that actually screen b applications before they went through the whole process doesn't i kind of make sense as well because i don't want another committee but to able to bring these stores on this and control what we have seen them popping up all over to the neighborhoods on neighborhoods that are complaining that they're having these stores back up again in the neighborhoods that we know the problem with the stores but we want to put some policies in place some maybe require that they install cameras that is monitored by the police department and then also like garbage receipt garbage are piling up in from these stores make them
welcome to the belmont tree lighting ceremony i'm in man i'm with my kin my producer and we are putting on a great show all of the businesses are offering things to people we have seen a clause come in we have a tree lane six about to start so follow us a sell houses they also help the community out guys we really really appreciate thank you so much for are you going to sing to belmont the foundation for better education so it'll be my last one to one of those history in the foundation oh cold enough out here towns around where it's my favorite  can i ask you guys what you want for christmas don't know no idea if you like  yeah that's great what about you guys have you decided what you want for christmas and eat meat oh no i want a bone like a the big one or the little one and you  last year any time or you want to make the world a better place mine in one of the most awesome towns out there we've got great people great community you all come together on a night like tonight merry christmas
yes excited she's a little nervous to have a what you want to take away from that running doesn't always have to be about winning it can be just about having fun just to also to support the group brandon graham foundation which shows amazing things in town for athletics is there anything you want to take away from the thing i enjoy most about this is the community i always see a few people i know here like ball and good chance to run into for yeah we're all going to have big meals so you get out you do your run you go home and have your big lunch or brunch or whatever it's a great event any last comments about this fair good luck good luck did i'll probably be pulling in using my name is joan subaru i am emily so why did you run the race today because i believe you know it's a great cause to have the scholarships available and to remember the young man who lost his life i didn't know brennan personally but we went to high school at the same time so i feel like it's important to come out and support the community and his family and keep his memory alive so what do you think about the race today also if i was going to challenge for what's your skill but we've been doing this race almost every years you know pretty much and they like to run we like to run so we get out there and you guys have fun ye first time actually running it but i've walked it for years and i decided to actually give it a try and run it it was fun it's a good cause and it's been like julie says but it's tradition i need to be with my family and this is the hot but it was good for my first run i'm actually kind of happy about home i was old but it was not as fast as i could have gone so maybe i felt a little better i finished it  great to have any other comments about this not just that it's just a wonderful wonderful day father's day and you know for brendan grant foundation and just everyone getting together community it's really nice really good i'm just happy and off that everybody comes out as we have as much of a turnout as we do every single year it never ceases to amaze me and it's like a search for a great cause i'm very happy that we could come together as a community
there is no connection i'm hearing to the amendment of that application so i within the rules of the commission i was allowed to amend it we did it some months are hearing i reiterate what i'm hearing and it was it was discussed no objection we moved for with the hearing with the accident being on this case october thirtieth two thousand and nine if i can address the argument kind but problems while working as a police officer and you can see as the history goes on he knew it was something to do with work but couldn't quite important what was going on his arms were elbows were bothering him while he was working the under drang it makes sense he's not a person knows he will t is the date that he was sent to the special stock to garz if you look at the intake form of dr garst in the case were charged off you need i'm sorry is filling up the form and it says i have problems with work and yes i believe it's related to work he feels that out i picked that date because in his mind according to duran he felt he had to work with a condition in according to rand he felt this is a condition that needed work the pieta care it's the first time you need or care if he even testified at trial it's reasons real person know that they have the addition and maybe it would work where they need the help that's the date if you look at the intake form october thirtieth two thousand and nine is the date he said i need help i'm going orthopedic surgeon i need this taken care of if you look at the this swap is a confined space it has a computer it has a resting point for the arm for the officers to use a computer it also has a hard surface and this job analysis talks about these officers in the car sixty eight hours a day and they get a new computer system officer needham identifies it's not a typist so he is working on the computer resting his arm rotating over the computer and typing in reports and also residents on the windowsill  that's what's causing the problem dr hawkers interesting he's the only doctor in this case that says i don't believe in expensive pressure doesn't exist but that's funny because the company doctor dr moody says yeah that does exist he t he said other police departments took him to squad cars sad men there he worked there he said it's a combined space it's not your normal car what about the nurse that they hired during her cross examination look how she testified she acknowledges very reluctantly i asked a lot of
contract before now not separate contract they have to have a joint contract just like this case one of them is discharged in the first week the other one goes on for years and performs the rest of the contract under the theory of this case that charge read the decision is doing that i read the decision is saying that because there was a fifty fifty split in the only gets fifty percent regardless and he realized dept is to say that the he doesn't get any held correct does is because there is a fifty fifty split one person is going on is just like the death cases and therefore the remaining person only gets half but each each year still in part of the fifty percent of bit of a sort of a red herring here with respect to the strictly legal component of the analysis that for the fee to be added assume for a moment that that the result of a fifty percent share would be inequitable but nonetheless had there if i understand your argument it is predicated on the agreement between ross and pharaoh the express or at least found to be express understanding that each would have fifty percent share that at that moment that that agreement was so was executed that ross lost his right to any more than a one half share of the one third regardless of what happened downstream ross so as far as you're concerned you owe one third to the joint venture but the question really comes to this are you entitle to take advantage of the fact and thereby reduce your exposure told me is that what you should have paid carol was just quantum arrow and that and that and that and that and that ra should be limited to half the contingency in under those circumstances if the pharaoh had been properly paid under under the rosenberg case under this theory you've agreed to the rosenbergs it's limited ferro to quantum merit recovery you would have to pay less then to tell them out of the contingency you'd only have to pay one half a contingen
event that in this case the happily dr laura who is a veterinarian who lives on one portion of his property about three and a half months of the year reputed to turner's access the actual trial he did not use the where the prior owner of my client's property had gone in and out a guest book and so they are a doctor or argue that we should still continue to have only have access through the front yard of the neighborhoods and who had to share property and was no real property and had simply refused it in fact if the court would look at the transcript mrs turner said that she and her children went there and that people treated her in such a manner that she became concerned for herself kill the safety and let the other two possibilities that access were approximately a half a mile away one ball going through  a neighbor's front yard half a mile away was just three hundred feet we've got here and another one was over thirteen hundred feet away and had to go through mom wetlands to get there so the issue really becomes whether or not the court erred not finding one or two or one and two i know i don't care which way the health court rules on this for a living but this was it was obvious that this was the road it was depressed it was between two fence lines and it was lower and could clearly be seen that it was a road now if you're asking me whether or not there ever been rock and down there was no testimony could even also look at the last you can see words obvious that it came directly off of the original goose neck it just makes logical sense so if the court also take a look at the logical hole in council argument about someone just saying they're giving property to the county and therefore it's rather county asked to maintain is that in that the court would want to take a look at dr  testament because i really i didn't understand why we had gone through this amount of cost and litigation years litigation over forty five feet by three hundred feet that we were asking for fifteen