same history to this surgeon dr yuck who who opined that his condition of ill being was connected to his job there's obviously some credibility issues that are involved here but what is your reaction to the allegation that it no time in june july or august to go for the complete accident report several months apparently went by and nothing was reported how does it appear in well under the law he's  which also involve the nose his shoe the ad has to be interpreted literally in terms of nose and that particular case they employ didn't give the employer knows until forty nine days after he stopped working for the someone has a reasonable knowledge that there is a relationship between this condition building and something that happened at work so i mean if you're going to cite  poor her because the man's working and sneeze all day that knee pain was coming from more therefore it was put on sufficient notice of the accident but once again i reiterate though this is not an issue in this case the the only observational thing missing from a commission determination right right that in effect the arbitrator determination of credibility should not be disturbed they can't touch but really all we have here is basically the determination by the commission of i'm not mistaken the liver acid video if you will of the claimant is question because the claimant does not give the least notice of connectivity between a condition and a work right correct but that no that he is but one of the break it down simply the evidence indicates that the medical providers work history the claimant did not report it work related accident with any of his medical providers until september twenty eighth two thousand and eight several months that the claimant or anyone who goes to a physician is forthcoming with all the information that will help them be cured or treated and we operate under  lol i think they're making the fight him based upon what's recorded and now that he never even made to begin with they're using they know completed by the chiropractor not by how he got injured and dr feeler is the one who wrote a note saying he's off work to to replay the injury and he continued to follow up dr feedly afterwards after dr ron and the doctor for me severe could be equally drawn the other way i would say no they can't do it all in that fashion and these points are well supported by the evidence this process to be was familiar with worker's comp and have wire leads in those quire claims when he saw his positions he gave the history of who work with the fire he was exhibited a safety video and told by his employer to report all accidental injuries on the job immediately and fill up an accident report none of which he complaining to his chiropractor of pain radiating from his neck down to the shoulder and the chiropractor have already made a recommendation that he undergo an l r i study on july twenty second and again on calls into his family doctor dr fielding for prescriptions july twenty second august twenty second again no mention of any work out of so september fifteenth he does tell the employer i'm having pain in my neck and i'm going to go see a doctor can i leave work implores that's fine valid what's significant when he goes to the doctor field around september seventeenth castle indicates that mr hosty told about an accident and all these doctors neglected to report it barbara but he did give a history and when he said he had symptoms since july which is it consistent with at august x and inconsistent with  september twenty fourth september twenty first excuse me in the history recording again is forty one year old male with three month history of neck and left upper extremity any again there's no mention of any where the claimant needed a note from the group carrier worker was checked condition but he mentions the history to doctor he often lawfully performed the surgery on february tenth of zero five the history there is even scrutiny but in this case even if you were to apply to tional scrutiny based upon the findings of fact of the evidence in all these inconsistent histories i believe that what overcome any level of scrutiny that you apply and that the