was in connection with that research misconduct investigation there is no question about that the plaintiffs the doctors do not make any allegations with respect to whether or not there was misconduct we do not half years later since the allegation temp been made the allegations were made in january of two thousand and thirteen the preliminary inquiry was supposed to take sixty days the investigation has a but these in their bylaws they are to them to be sure the regulations are simply the basis that they added protections to them is that the guy was became part of our contract with the institution and so that take as long as he wants it then goes out all right or i can take it as long as it once and then goes to the a l j can take as long as it went all the time i play at the seventy six years old it is a very real possibility that he would be dead back but it doesn't take away the losses that they've suffered in the intervening three four or five years the loss of jobs the loss of speaking opportunities the loss of consulting opportunities the loss of the ability to continue with their work in this country but violations and then they may not be violations i mean that's what the court to decide but that my clients have a right to have their allegations heard by a court not shudder to decide and think about it we're the institution level we're suing the institutions the district court right the institution who's being sued because simply delay it for three to six years and right our right to have any recourse you need in federal court or wrote if i suppose harvard and now we're going to take three and a half years because you're kind of old if you drive about three and a half years none of our competitors will be able to hire you because we put a crowded movie or ahead and the by the contract there's absolutely no recourse for any of harvard's doctors should harvard to do what's being alleged here well again taking an assumption that within that contract there were deadlines these type of  the investigation has been growing on since the thirteenth it's a multi tiered process so we went through inquiry and that took about screwy or two investigation where we are now the question of evidence as i understand it is complete and the it's the institution's decision as to what it finishes there is an extension to the law i recently grated extension of the investigation process to remember first the status right now and there been steady process throughout his of the collection of evidence has been has completed and the payroll which is a panel of experts their professors their doctors they obviously have other things that they do is draft spending serious time on this really important issue and the already has has in consultation with the institution has granted that additional time because they recognize just how important this investigation is there has granted at least five extensions so far one of which was three months after the fact in other words the time period it had ended without the institution seeking subject of research misconduct allegations and that they were going after all of their work once there was a good wait my clients were shut down in this country thank you