injustice in the circuit court in crawford county twice on the st being during the pendency of his number fourteen d fifty eight in which is found that my client was in fear under his thirty one d b the adoption and for failing to maintain a reasonable degree of interest concern or responsibility particularly after the visit time during christmas time two thousand and fifteen and his person period of time thereafter so there was contact by telephone and there were attempts to contact by physical presence as well which i'll get to is that the  earlier and then he went back to screen had more surgery in february two thousand and fifteen wearing his testimony he was not able to work or drive until one point in the transcript or brief several areas in which the kurds considered irrelevant evidence and facts or twisted them in my view to conform great minimize them in fact one of the one of the points we make that the kurds seem to be challenging the mere fact that my client was injured by saying that he didn't produce any medical records well that that was not the disputed issue in the case and nobody's talked about medical records during the trial that suddenly came up in his order and there are other factors   he got served with the adoption petition the court ignored that testimony and made a finding that the mathematical calculation it's just an example that if you figure and the circumstances in impediments that prevented him from doing better which there were many the courage to traditional nervous after the trial  other things like the fact that american oil company is the biggest employer in crawford county and to that i say run right judicial notice it was my understanding  always that that's something that should be brought out during the trial so that it can be discussed in tact cross examined or whatever the judge whether it comes up with these things up to the trials over there can't be proper biggest employer in crawford county so why that's a failed attack and the fact that my clan moved to texas for economic reasons because it could make thirty bucks an hour down there is testimony where he describes his own personal knowledge of the way that employees react and interact with marathoner up company proper accounting none of that was and this time then it was not really him the record in this case it's my understanding that some time during two thousand  sixteen there were already protection proceedings brought by mr and mrs horlock because the mother i think this is a her and her husband were involved with drug abuse of some kind so they proceedings to get the child home that's what happened why is she in fear because she didn't show up it was she was the salt in the adoption  intervention no it was after in the decrease there was the intervention and the order granting the hoax who could custody and then later on the adoption proceedings as i say it was met with double barreled that was good advocacy on the other side now i think it's important to recognize  needs in the record that he gets that phone call from the hopes and myself do what you can to get my son out of harm's way that folks do that did he tell you that he had that surgery and you where he did not i don't think he came up to tell him the better i think he said he was unable at this time to get there and he told the hopes to do what they had to do ok that's not unreasonable is ran her husband have in the court found some serious substance abuse issues and it would not be appropriate for the child to get there but the child it really is benedetto so why i don't understand why he didn't know where the child school year i don't think ever was fully developed enough fellow i guess what i'm trying to figure out is he does come up here has anybody indicated to him that the child is still living without year twenty six team in august i don't want to tell office mine are saying is he testified that he was receiving text messages from nancy on how the child was doing and that w have some interest there i would say that he is communicating with nancy at some point the airball your mother i don't know it wasn't he said he made contact with nancy but then but it  the mother two hundred times and the child was never there and that did raise suspicions in your mind and he had he said no and then at other points you talked about what good care hopes provided so if it was in the hopes of care he had no concerns because opposed to provide good care but at some point as a parent you have to step up the plate you can't what other people ration children or you take the risk of what happened here sitting back and waiting for the world to come to you you can't do it as a parent you can't sit back  sundays and mondays and then i think she exercised one record was out of the several that were supposed to occur and then in the hopes of frustration filed an it during the will be to go meet with mediator try to work this out right and what i'm asking is a march until the hoax were granted primary care of the minor to a court order getting primary care the child to the house but more and more importantly from my perspective in that court order it says he got no parenting time granted so i'm not going to blame me for that but somebody requested that at the time the folks got custody of this child when the father knew nothing that was going on from a legal attempted to make contact the day before clued in made of eighteen believe so there's no contact with the h call and speak with cynthia williams the mother and his testimony was that he called cynthia williams two hundred times and once or twice a week and the reason that he called was to check on the w trial that didn't stop after this order of november that he didn't know anything about you know did simple word games tell him about the order he testified you know all on one reasonable inference ranger or serves processes in texas with the petition for adoption which said in it that the pope's had custody he testified that was a surprise to him he virtually immediately retained counsel