MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
the central testimony in all of those settlements was from the attorney general's office as our legal counsel they would appear before us and testify that in their professional legal judgment the settlements were justified under current law and that the liability and these bills are absolutely crucial to the well being of and the future of the entire state of new mexico as anyone from a western state knows water is the lifeblood of our communities whether you live in downtown albuquerque on a settle on an even older water rights lawsuit in fact the oldest active case in the federal court system this settlement will secure the rights of for  northern and would create a regional water system to deliver water to the pueblos and to the santa fe county water utility agreements represent many years of negotiations and many compromises from all sides and i would urge the committee to without objection the motion to reconsider the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table for their business any further comments suggestions for the good of the order not to meet our natural resources stand
robbery the victim was not connected to the robbery the person who was found shot was not connected to any robbery crime there was no robbery of the store was attempted robbery of the store with two people who were known to you said that i was not part of going to the gas station on a regular basis because i can't remember how far was from my house to walk to so i probably wouldn't have done it but assuming you did your information is correct and they hang out  in the event we see this person because i really hate the sky and i want to take him on does become a design have to relate to that particular day at that particular time but there has to be  issues some people said they had spoken in the in the store but that really doesn't seem to be an issue still why can't there be some inference that that time started the process that they had talked about because  in taken together in a very small inference that these people were working in concert they were working together but it has to be pieced together it's not just one instance it's not just that they are right here all at the same time victim in this car apart and inside is you know when you've not been standing next to the green right then near the victim and then he becomes at least one of the shooters because you can see as the as they're overwhelmed and that in fact that is a spontaneous act that may have put her maybe the defendant didn't know that these people are going to want guns but it doesn't matter because at that point he's part of this he's delivered the  one like we would we have that much the list sticks in casings around the parking lot but what if the common design was simply to protect the defended when he had his words and he came with those people and they had weapons he left with those or in this at the same time and they had weapons is that is is there a common desire to protect him enough to have been found guilty of this murder they're acting and he's not disavowing their actions in any way distancing themselves that they become his actions to that would not have permitted intrinsic there would been a point if it did if it just happened today just now then you'd be no reason one for the these men who shot the victim were there because the defendant intended to get the victim to understand the
require is we can't go to that point i'm trying to understand why the case at the threshold must then establish that there was proper service person hundred percent owned subsidiary manufacturing the product over russia and then being taining control product and putting it into the stream of conscious they do something different they grant non exclusive case is distinguished from for example beverly hills fan or burger where the foreign defendant or the defendant maintains a control over the infringed and they say that they are inhibited or prevented from proving infringement in the united states of the united states because they're being deprived jurisdiction of the doesn't recognize subpoenas for discovery and i say i don't know who the law is suppression of cyprus but we know that there is some countries which don't permit such discovery then want that so they just has no presence and has taken no two seventy one perpetrated act in the united states just like in that case where you had a license or in massachusetts granting a non exclusive personal service i'm looking for for him to see the delivering a copy of the summons of the complaint to the individual personally another distinguishing point in this case is that right you would say the right to modify the software so this this is not is it the russian it is just shipping goods into the united modify the software they roups what they do they do that they had with their rights they had under the secret they do in fact modify software for sale in the us you're going to rein in the software without the source code and modify it and have a working product good luck
it was wrongly decided because it did not apply to a case that was being discussed there were nine amendments in this case over a period of many years and this supreme court ultimately said and so didn't date in some ways also suggest that that could happen there with whatever kind of care they were giving and in fact i know that the issue in this case but isn't isn't something done b but they can prescribe medication and that's what m d s do yes and no necessary medication was described here as i can tell but they can begin the judgment or a night in treatment facilities which it obviously was based upon your own admission why would this why would the failure to allow this to be presented to the jury at any prejudicial effect on your point well for  my treatment is the same if you have aids or if you have that i don't need to know that i'm not treating that i am a blocking the system so god he i think would require a medical one because i think when the original complaint was filed the person wasn't deceased and therefore you knew that he didn't mister correct correct so if they filed the wrongful death s
continue in criminal activity run boot camps not that i'm aware
poll specifically record will contain the same coverage limits that they have on their proposals in addition to that he provided copies of the park policies mister who's actually extra because mr rowley having been their insurance broker for ten years had copies of all these when the fire occurred over second two thousand and one they found out as they examine the policies that they had sufficient less coverage than they had requested and drastically less we're here because the trial court granted summary judgment where there was outstanding or outstanding issues of fact remaining for the trial for four or determination that is a question of fact that's longstanding in the law and that question of fact is tested in light of the relationship with the broker your longstanding relations coverage where things were policies provided one point five or five million in coverage for each building component limits of over three million dollars plus million dollars for business personal property they received one point five four for five or one building five hundred forty five thousand for another building which were not combined limits and by the way combining this can be confusing to insurance interest questions are this is the issue of whether a fiduciary relationship exists and whether the president may rely upon his agent to carry out its requests that's what we have here that's very very simple now we acknowledge that there may be question of contributory negligence involved as to whether they had a right to rely on their broker but the basic black letter law is that the insurance principle to be insured who have read the policies if it has it for the sure relationship with the independent broker here well it just happened involves merely the misappropriation of money but they act specifically says that it still applies the standard of ordinary care in the analysis of whether  it if there's any question about it before this decision this decision wraps up the issue and things get to that question something
afterwards they raised the penalty to fifteen years which you can't do but here was sort of the shifting thing first he she hoped first to file then she knew she couldn't get it then there was some intervening decision she thought maybe she could get it then there was changed her position she she was stuck with whatever they were going to do unlike that situation where someone might say well if i had known that now i'd have filed earlier we're right and we get  perceived that she was even seeking that avenue when she didn't file work until after it was no longer available well i would say that her expectation at the time i activity is was there if the person involved had known what was going to be done they would have altered that court to harm them whereas here once you filed a claim prison but i wouldn't of held up the bank had i known that i would be sent to jail for fifteen years there's nothing in that sense that she could have done know what i gather when you said what she did all she did was try to pursue present evidence ordinary routine rules for true activity should be changed we should not apply our we have not made that specific allegation because we believe that this is factual so they are here fi june of ninety seven and also landed with abort while the green case and subsequent cases were in fact and those cases entitle her to a to suppose she had not have not had that belief what would she have done differently and the only thing that she would have done differently i take it is she wouldn't have submitted this evidence because it wouldn't be r she clearly needs all three of the requirements for retroactivity here and again there are many cases where this year there are many cases that do say that if you're just an advocate out there and you don't position would mean that that is that the veterans court essentially exercise discretion in deciding whether or not in her case in her particular case at least the retroactivity w
or treat the defendant and noble more the only purpose of the search on the defendant's purse was to complete a routine police report at page twenty a higher expectation of privacy in the mountains of her purse the state offered no evidence that officer pierce served out there for this was done other than to obtain information so that a routine police report could be done officer fears most is highly important in this case the state crime would mean it's a number of reasons why the search should be justified one prong of their doctrine after doing the emergency systems that police officers often provide for example in the case of an accident where the police officer was motivated to find information in a driver's license such as whether the person was diabetic or having medical condition there is a recognized exception for them for us but if the police officer candidly admits under oath that is not my purpose in vehicle in order to let the driver know you have gas companies and is on your car and trying to help you out that's fine but that isn't the case here conceptually what we're dealing with is a police officer trying reasonable means of gathering information to get the license or information from the license i'll ask to be explored for example the colorado supreme court said the officer could have asked the nurse dr oz the admissions screened and it's a small rural community in southeastern illinois but it easily located her and her mother knew this police officer from contacts with them at the bank so these are not strangers he pocket or something it was within our power within the purse he was looking for the wallet to gain access to the lines which he thought would be there but he didn't get the life that without the fairly got a big out of a testified he was looking for the wallet we use and usually a wall of something large sitting in the center of the purse and why did he you know did he explain why he decided to go to the compartments first or did he find that outside pocket ran the fan or not but i mean generally most women's purses the outside pockets are smaller areas in the interior the large areas where what you would think co she listened intelligently engaged in conversation she spent as i recall ten or fifteen minutes at the scene with the officer he never asked to see her purse never made the man for her license never did anything that the statute requires him
will and was not voluntary and i'm trying to determine how the court made that factual finding there was no trial there was no testimony there's been a lot of facts thrown back and forth which deal with the whether or your memorandums when you're sitting there was an agreement between that was presented to the court that those would be admitted into evidence and there was proper foundation for those read was that it in the contract and this is not only in september of two thousand and twelve she gave the corporation back to the kids because they can't engage in these activities you can select another there were no place to back there were discussions about it the justices will see the contract and the reasons in the minutes for her terminations is under section seven which are hundred really seven eat because there's no teeth but she was terminated for the cause not intentionally quit did not intentionally do anything to lose her job this is her company still today she owns three percent of the still today she didn't want to see it destroyed because it was her
this is the story of michael blake former paratrooper one of the many eggs g i s were found themselves drawn back to those places they had known during the war seeking the old drill of excitement but never finding it but blanks was a your life liberation of the south of france it was before the w some day you can come back for it after the war is it started again one fine august morning in paris the years have been tough for michael blake everything had gone wrong so michael came back for somewhere in the south of france he knew of a glove which was worth a fortune but someone had been waiting for michael blake's return college and it looks like we spent the night together on the phone don't you see chris another big bad luck this proves it you're not to blame because the price is destroyed by the war all right my comeback if you weren't ready to say thing i where the french are gonna be one of their spies convenient arrangement less beside the point you're broke that's why you're going to france to cash in on the blood so it's still here bring him to the village more than fifty nothing would you like to is it is it possible give the bread yes mamma said you won't catch code you can change in the kitchen i want to make a deal i only want t
although the courts in most cases remi you're on a plane would just like to reiterate again that the case the guilt over the
your life liberation of the south of france that was the end of the beginning they took to the words and the story stopped dead for several years it started again one fine august morning in paris the years have been tough for michael blake everything had gone wrong so michael came back for somewhere in the south of france he knew of a glove which was worth a for but someone had been waiting for michael blake's return thank you look over your shoulder and some of the little men to gracious stayed out tonight instead of disposing of the deceit it might have been possible you seem to be a reasonably intelligent person if you'd kill this man i believe you would have destroyed his drawing it was a day i mean  that was the end of the morse you can see the go track over there it starts from the village going to the precipice and it's a very dangerous cost on the face of the cliff it will see the track clearly as it reaches the valley and big bags across rough country to a point directly below  i don't you see chris another big bad luck this proves it you're not to blame because the price is destroyed by the war all right my comeback if you weren't ready to say things i is a little bit shy yes you see we just got married to day to way out before we get in any deeper
have in its possession within the one hundred twenty days in the listed in my brief the first is the defense witness at the first two trials was persuaded to recant your testimony after the one hundred twenty days had expired and there were two additional of the psychological expert testimony i think you would have to concede that there are at the very least some substantial work of a number of nuances in the issue presented in this time from the issue that's presented to suggest that there is an obligation upon the district attorney's office for the attorney general to complete counsel i mean i will be very very interested stick to don't well this goes to the district courts conclusion that it was there has not been exhaustion there could not be exhaustion of the fifth amendment issues the admission of the psychologist testimony because  centerpiece of their appeal date is the absolute set up piece of their appeal went to trial in june he was able to file a few of it is preserving a number of issues for appeal that he would have been waived if you had gone to trial march he was able to apply for entertain funds to hire an expert to bring that
you know well oh oh oh
orbit you know with strength after all this time and money and work the latest satellite is finally ready to go there in a terminal position our standards are locked  r ready to assume control any time after third stage burn out beef you're acting rather small you look like a man who's just inherited a major portion of the world you might not be so far wrong in a way of speaking this is ricky acknowledge it's just can't be happening exactly what's going on here don't mess around with it i don't i don't think i want to know premise yes i don't understand what's going on around here i don't know no radio even the wire service hanging in mid air hosting a control device is this correct key how did you know the car stopped running could have been a broken axle are anything could it it just stopped running like every car did today like everything mechanical did  what's going on it's all a mystery you know something you're not telling it relax you have time to time for explanations moment that what you're saying is true that a creature calls on tara has come from being and it shuts down the world's power and is putting the world's population under its dominance if that is true why aren't you fighting it because this period and this is working with me after all i was the first contact and i've contacted him stupidity and example about arrogance and prince restrain man's progress i should know i've been victimized by it myself and i'm tired is going to end yes quickly hardly realize it's been i can talk to you i was supposed to kill you where you're trying to destroy and found that
grade between westwood and bellingham and you know i'm expecting school ten three minutes remaining the second quarter draw all this time would this would be an excellent opportunity to
one of the reasons why i
be one of th
selling radio mr smith fortune has smiled upon you the day you were about to become the proud owner of this beautiful automobile well i'll be doggone could have sworn i locked it two weeks ago when i left here what well yeah but you could buy a lot of trout for the money they pay you to si become rich and you see that all right and after you find that care you come back to philadelphia owe me something here this is the
last night one hundred dollars when i'll be doggone could have sworn i locked it two weeks ago when i left here what all right and after you find out here you come back to philadelphia
came to see you post a very nice you know i'm a you're still very attractive you age more cheerfully than i i'm getting frightened worried about my locks the cigarettes he it except that you know perfectly well your father thinks you have a date with some good do you think that's wrong and by all means telling the truth  he asks you how you know he's a bad man you callee telling the to know from personal experience on chump why you insist on misunderstanding me i'm older than you i made a operator get me murray hill for four or five nine eight police so call look down i change my mind about dinner let's not go to a restaurant i think i like your original invitation never that i have been in your apartment five course i can post haste all right i'll meet you at your apartment at eight o'clock because i  all right if you called all you have to do is one thing of anything to leave my father's house police yes i understand to see if we got the facts straight the body was lying on the floor in front of the fireplace and skull was bashed in the was a giant that was a good five burning in the fireplace no signs all right fine and i'll get on this right away and don't worry i know but somebody has to do the dirty work as part of a job all right i'll be back soon now baby stop worrying about me come and sit down here i notice he said he was going away for a while you mustn't let anything come between you and the realization of that career i'm very fond of i want you to know that what happens to you which is the deepest concern to me thank you chance all right everybody grateful same as a fall unconscious any way yes good nice good night gabriel invents a technique and you use it to kill his wife have you thought for the danger he will be when he finds out excuse me that i'm that i was in charge of the house here is my responsibility things weren't going as  with a relative and that would be bad taste to carry on a family c i have a pretty good idea this to laurie i want a combination of that s well i had to look fine i changed it just before i left to make even surprise you to know that i have positive proof that you ought to be killed what positive proof to have a man by the name of gabriel be notified and gabriel will start talking us your proposition life is sweetness go even to a blind man if you let us go i'll try and persuade mr lorry to turn over the balance of the formula to you  you we must have positive proof that you will let us go on  she didn't know where i watched as i tried to tell her that but but you know she can be very stubborn we tried to sell to let you walk to the station it was all right i think i'd better go look for this is we finished but i'm kind of weren't there is all right we need you all right stand watch outside yes i they have nothing to do with this that i take a good look at your wife and she