be equivalent to say there was a form of dysfunction in that communication protocol you all realize there were some dead space that could be used to prove the communication protocol and that's what the patent is direct which is not abstract i will bow to your formulation i want you to disagree with me if if if if you think there's something off about what i said and there's a better because this uses means language the williamson presumption that there means less function is that doesn't that mean that the specific structure in the us back is actually part and there is no claim construction issue in the case that not raised quite construction is a basis for not looking at one on one so i think it is fair as the district court found that the claims really are just to this general event of concept well acknowledgement that maybe this is worth a diverting to because there's something lurking here we met we only referred to their brief would say which said these claims made include such things as  i think our point was they haven't really made a structural argument and told us what that correspondence structure is i actually think there is a problem if you go down that path because as to what is the invented concept there really isn't any structure that describes what you have is the existing structure and then you have what the claim it's adding to each inquiry message and additional data feel that's it and that's what the plan describes as the general intent of concept they recognized that you could allow parked devices to communicate by keeping this open channel utilizing in particular a data field that was already present that seems like a very specific solution not a sort of result oriented claiming approach but rather a specific solution or problem and there is no doubt that they have alleged in the supports that this illusion dramatically reduced the lag time or wait time in these systems between when you move the mouse and when you actually have a reaction on the computer drone i think  and that is not there's nothing to it so they did recognize something they basically said hey let's make some one of these fields all of a basically just labeling what that data is in the is not the same as saying this is what the corresponding structure is in the specification and the claims are limited to that they have not done and as i said and that was document under ninety one of the district court th apply to any limitation so by saying these claims include that we don't really have a problem with that because they could certainly cover it but that's not the same thing as saying they're limited to the particular structure and then pointing to that structure and specifications and one of the problems is all the structure is conventional bluetooth that's all that's described you have the data saying use the communication protocols that and i think the district court was correct when she said that's what this is the actually holding polling data in one of these fields now that was described as a general intent of concept in the  there really isn't anything more to it and that's why it comes down to being an abstract idea and i just ask about that yeah therefore it's let's assume for a minute that in that inquiry message there's now going to be placed in a particular kind of new data field yes one that includes polling data you know a certain amount of claim construction has to be done whether formal or otherwise to understand what is going on but even that why is that not a technical improvement in how this little communication network works  i believe it's because it's claimed it went to high level and so that it's merely the abstract idea of adding polling data there is no there's nothing additional it doesn't say what the data is what the rules are for how it works by an order of magnitude well just because you recognize in your play that just to be clear it's only polling during that inquiry message period so it works perfectly fine the rest of the time it's only in that ten point two four it could be i mean all you have so therefore it's not an event and because it only improves response time sometime well your honor that's are the problem with an abstract idea is it's not fleshed out when you just say add some polling data to about part stations and so i think that's where the focus is and when you look at it it really adds nothing to what was already there in bluetooth other than recognizing that some of this data could be