city that it's not government speech just hypothetically red planet and kill the standard government speech three criteria ok is a is a secular organization and what i'm what i'm getting at this would be in my mind a different case if the a was if there was a flag if the city had allowed flags to be from that were and sponsoring say the jewish faith or the muslim for the th or any dog or a religious affiliation i'm not talking about religious symbols that are incidental inconsistent with what was going on in any other form of low but because commission really made a subjective determination that it was quote inappropriate ok to go back to my three things history however armored i don't see why that makes the flag pole which you can see from many places in the city when you down to see what's happening how says two hundred feet something like that i don't see why having an a band determines the nature of the flagpole itself you chose to make it one policy and part of the policy i was a fan says you know it's a public forum on city hall plaza and you don't have a different policy a lives and then he scored a whole series of arguments about how the flags you have permitted to fly have some religious in nature e and so before he started talking about i ask you about there's one other ingenious and troop rotation that that that the flood will has some special significance if we if we interim for that spatial to mean that that's describing best regardless of how this case comes out or what interpretive steps we may find a certainly i really wish you would convey to the principals and in the city that properly documented what the city believes its wishes to be its criteria one of the flagpole would be in the best interests of the citizens of boston and certainly to the best interests that the commissioner katz to make that choice at that why does concede i stand with city policy but you are not arguing that by flying the flag of the bunker hill made the decision to fly the flag of portugal that it became the policy of these city of boston to express its support for the portuguese community and city by flying the flag the city is somehow saying we approve of and we and i don't want to use that word indoor term that we are as a city conveying a message of support for the portuguese community here by flying that flag you're surrounded in ok what about the bunker hill your policy says nothing about religious symbolism bad in your practice has been to allow secular  that may or may not contain the makeshift symbolism that seems to be irrelevant to you it's merely whether it's in a private secular organization is that right the city made a decision that to fly a flag primarily endorsing a particular a legend eighty three feet on a flagpole owned by the city by the front to city hall could expose the city to a constitutional violation of the establishment clause and then we saw to avoid such a violation by not approving the raising of that flag and we raised a bad flag and decided that we wanted to raise the question quite high  but i have no sense of whether these examples are in fact examples of the present administration's choices that the former and the indication of sort of how problematic this is in the absence of many statements by the city i don't write it's really a balance here which is where the