i'm trying to figure out if you've gotten any great principle and i haven't heard anything yet so the narrowing principle is that that you have to demonstrate discrimination against interstate commerce which is th say we don't like how much for having to pay for our our power bill every month and we operate interstate commerce you know it has to while that i think that question is whether that somebody who operated interstate commerce and otherwise had no above what our clients would require in an equally in an experimental industry that that had never gotten beyond the experimental stage for technology they weren't even considered for evolving into and that demonstrate that that confirmed the comment that that w anything any particular customer is charged actual rate of service based on demonstrably a criteria of how much it costs to serve them here they're going beyond that by adding the thirty two percent surcharge that has no authority of the utilities and transportation commission and your remedies are got the commission itself doesn't work here because we have no vote in grant county and then in the washington  write in the differences the only difference is that if they if the massachusetts company had a factory in new hampshire that operated interstate commer operating in grant county every cryptocurrency mine are operating in grant county is subject to read schedule seventeen without regard for where they're incorporated without regard for where they are operating that is whether they're operating it in in terms of their minds out of state or internationally or only in grant county they all pay the same rate and this is not new hampshire our that is not what has happened here what is happening here is in the in two thousand and seventeen grant county was with the rural public utility district that produces demand for power from the cryptocurrency industry and as a result of that they needed to respond in a way that would allow them to continue to provide power to all of it situation but right now they're there they're stuck they need your power and you can charge him any rate you walk and it doesn't appear to be a neutral a neutral right you've got all the cryptocurrency cars are equal but the cryptocurrency there aren't equal to any other demands placed on a grant county puny by the currency industry however when when when the beauty stepped back and looked at this they concluded that if you obstacle that in the future there could be other evolving and that would prevent the same kinds of challenges to the to the district that the group he did so what they did was they created a set of neutral criteria to be applied in assessed against any industry that might fit that category and then they do that on an annual basis there's an annual review process so the cryptocurrency entities now are contemplating coming into grant county are on notice that this is the rate now they will pay they are also on notice that every year they the rate will be reviewed to ensure that they haven't in fact evolved beyond being in an evolving industry the kind of rigs those ated with the currency presently and other entities will be subject to the same kind of review and if they be run tyria they will then if the not the currency evolving industry is not unique in that regard to other large consumers of power in grant county in other rate classes also pay a considerable if you will what we call cross margin or subsidy or social benefit or so this is not something new and it's certainly been the discretion the broad discretion the indian allowed under washington r blotchy and so this was this was a this was a factor that was taken in to account by by the commission and in their legislative capacity you know they concluded that it was a real of factor that they needed to guard against and you're right your honor that the rate includes a number of factors some are what we would call related to distributions some are related to transmit and the related simply to the ability to generate power  so so i think at the end of the day get on the board commerce clause press and you know if you look at the command of the supreme court you know the question is is what grant county did driven by can you know that the car the door covered was driven any any other entity that might not be in the future is subject to a schedule seventeen or are being treated the same and to the extent that there is that this idea that well is because you come into a in this case a county if you disagree you're operating there you're bunch spinning there you're doing your business there and then because you feel that you're being treated poorly because you're paying too much your link to city you argue there's a violation of the door commerce clause because we just so happen to be operating out there in the realm of interstate commerce but that is not the door with our door with commerce  claim that the end of the end of the day disco or that is the district court look at whether there was a peaceful visually discriminatory raid here it did not i one because it is not specific utility rate or certainly a lower utility rates lower electricity rate which is not the law it's not the law under the federal due process utility rate and even if they were able to or if the way a protected a constitutionally protected interest of that there are two components to a subsidy process challenge it they also have to show only way it would would be if washington state had not appointed a commission rather authority to enforce the terms of subject to the federal power act or there was some dispute among states when   the judge to look at purpose and in fact to see whether this is an ingenious mechanism to discriminating against interstate commerce not just to look at whether it's you know it's discriminatory on its face nd i think i wish i had come up with see on the question of mobility it may be that crypto currency generally is noble but that's not the case for the customers of the petitioners in this case they've invested about fourteen million dollars in real estate and electrical equipment in