change second transfer was again improper today i want to talk about the lack of evidence at the hearing on the department of juvenile justice the lack of evidence on the department of corrections the lack of evidence you can plead lack of going on you will be ok keep your head of the us is strong i love you all thank you for supporting me my prayers go out to the victim like i said i'm sorry we all make mistakes and learn my lesson there are judge kevin ryan is who was the was published decision people be more this word interpreted that to require evidence on the department of juvenile justice as well as in the comparable services in the adult apartment of corrections so the judge could actually that were be able in the department of juvenile justice and your was no mention at all of any comparable services in the department of corrections this names of the judge was unable to really consider  that the judge is supposed to consider the miners history of services and his willingness to participate meaningfully in those services now the only evidence at this transfer hearing on this factor was shame's two thousand and the only reason this information is known is because of an addendum attached to the adult pre sentence investigation report and from that report we know that shane when he was at the warning took high school education classes and he was on his way to graduating from high school x except that he had to come back to peoria for the second transfer hearing and we also know from that a den down that he was receiving services for mental health determination as to shane's willingness to participate meaningfully in the services this was the most recent and the best evidence of that factor and it just was not here and had this evidence then presented it also would have directly of which is the ability for the juvenile justice system to rehabilitate shane and the adequacy of services offered in those facilities but we have an entire two year period that was not presented at all which affected several different transfer factors so the judge there was not sufficient evidence prison on any of those things besides the facts and there was insufficient evidence regarding these two factors there was also the judge's outside an independent investigation when considering a stash we transfer factor he found a report about the department of juvenile justice when he was considering the as a reasonable likelihood that cha subject to the new was of evidence we don't know if this report was reliable now if he decides this improper consideration when the judge was considering the advantages of treatment in the juvenile justice system a factor i a to vote you lose the ability to serve on a jury not to mention the serious prison time that accompanies many of these convictions but the law treats children differently because children are known to be impetuous taking not appreciating the consequences of their actions and that's where the juvenile transfer statute is suit and suit detail because unless there is sufficient evidence presented on each and every one of these factors and unless the judge makes a proper considerations based on evidence that is admitted a child cannot be made to face the same consequences as an adult and that is in the good probation officer in the form of his mother investment and should be supported by state and corrections the specific treatment the specific the silesian programs and that is was not presented here mr braun did not testify to any of these programs instead of that he was actually not familiar but he assumed that years of the time he spent he wanting the judge did not have sufficient evidence to consider that factor that is perhaps the best evidence the machine which could have considered neutronium whether or not that factor was important and shameless