parts make a decision and the whole time he intended to bring these issues to another court when there was the right discussion boards are part and so i would ask courts to strike that not allowed to benefit from that movement if you at the outset that there is a special type presumption against release pursuant to thirty what forty two dollars ether e c for this charge but going to the factors themselves st the nature of the fence is unquestionably serious the parties dispute the extent of the damage to city hall but setting fire to a building specially an urban environment at a particularly chaotic site in buffalo and i can recall watching this live on television was certainly dangerous  act and the as a district court found mr wrenn for an alleged conduct was deliberate there's no indication the district court found that he was intoxicated or in any other way influenced by so called outside parties nd the weight of the evidence here is significant as we outlined in our papers both below and on appeal here mr redford captured on my television setting fire to city hall allegedly he confessed to the crime in a videotaped interview  with law enforcement and there are indications of consciousness of guilt where he discussed with a friend possibly changing his appearance getting a tattoo to disguise himself and of course his hair color had changed in between the time of the event and when he was arrested and he lied to law enforcement during that interview even where he admitted to the conduct he still told you minimized the extent of his criminal history and i go to the rd factor here the district court had very little need to speculate as to whether mr redford would comply with conditions of release because of his recent criminal history specifically for misdemeanor convictions a felony conviction a revocation of probation in the recent  past three bench warrants and at the time of the bail hearing at least three active orders of protection so the district court decision to find at that weight against pretrial release was well within its  run for also admitted as part of his characteristics that he had untreated mental health conditions that he declined treatment and medication that he had past and present substance abuse and that according to professional services at showing him allegedly participating in the looting of a seven hundred and eleven earlier in that evening and i just want to briefly address mr wrenn for its argument about colon one thousand being a compelling reason for crucial release i don't believe that that argument was made before the district court but any of it he's offered no medical reason why he might be more vulnerable than any other inmate in custody he's offered no information about the situation at his facility and of course it will face a risk of know judge my client did not start this fire there was an individual who was saying setting things on fire in the area the government has a good angle to find this individual or individuals the only person that the government found on that evening with regard to any of the violence that took place or any of the services placed in buffalo well as downtown area on the evening was my client because of this alleged mess that apparently the government goes though he's the only one that has  on probation in early cataract discount was about an hour outside my client violated probation because he did not have the financial means to make it back and forth to report to c issues with him being monitored because he was being monitored and although it's an in the same federal jurisdiction it's outside of your county they're not you don't have the means to really comply with the court order working fourteen years old client has asked so it's kind of disingenuous for the government saying we never brought up any health reasons why my client would be predisposed to some sort of risk because of coping nineteen that was let's replay it in the record that he does