MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
close to every member of the family we awaken to it is the morning we set our clocks back we dress according to the weather reports we listen to radio or news for entertainment it gives us informed every to world war two came cool to free countries to look to the united states for leadership and it became more vital for the american people to be informed of happenings all over the world radio responded to the challenge by increasing and with the election of light as an hour a new dimension was added to radio's record of public service president eisenhower was the first to believe his news conferences to be broadcast  radio became vital to america it is to this into the world of national news as it grew it became the very heartbeat of the community and today for hundreds of communities the local radio station is the only source of immediate in recent years the number of radio stations has more than double radio voice reaches everywhere throughout the land into almost every car into almost every room where people live and work when disaster strikes local radio stations stands ready to help recently radio reporters in mobile units risked their lives in dallas and kansas  they reported practically every twist and turn of the tornado they warned people out of its p operation downtown radio is on hand with it when the fire is under control a firsthand report from  its speed and flexibility radio has become an integral part of the community which means being active in your local radio station for instance works with the police to help locate missing persons to reunite in washington d c radio recently led a drive to clean up the potomac the cleveland ohio station in the city the plan to relieve little town traffic congestion in new haven connecticut a local station was responsible for getting a ra fortnight we've come to take for granted countless other services performed by radio like broadcasting traffic but what would be lost without reporters in helicopters get a bird's is scheduled for seven thirty tomorrow night on saturday the lions club hold it then you will picnic at seven mile run saturday night as a social of the first methodist church on elm saint and here's an item worth noting the annual fireman's prayer it begins tonight and runs through sunday it's being held in the empty lot just across from the old fire house fire chief wilkins announces a number of valuable prizes including a new car to holders of the lucky numbers sale through the day and every day your radio is ready to surf wherever you travel radio is doing its job it's  in the office in the that's the story of radios service service to the family to the community to the hong country radio has been a public it will continue its dedicated service throughout the years to
consent i mean obviously the government's not required to make any concession the context of a prosecution but if it wishes to not do so i think there's a real due process issue with kind of place and even near a negotiated resolution a guilty plea on the condition that's produced
we have three witnesses the question here is whether or not a pretrial lineup that occurred prior to trial and involve the police officer telling a witness who identified someone other than the petition when they were reviewing this petition and i agree with you i think there is some questions that need to be answered however i think there is a litany of recantation in the method it was provided it was in writing and there doesn't seem to be any connection between the individual the i think the chapman actually applies here we don't have a situation where the state court has made a ruling on the merits of the petition we have a situation where actually the district court itself  state court whether or not the merits of the claim that their lifeline was a violation of due process if they're if they're valid or not we don't have any discussion about that what we do have is the state court making a decision that the claim sh the court trial court allowed testimony regarding that initial first shoplifting eleven days earlier under evidence code eleven eleven zero one for the purposes of  jury hearing testimony from a witness for purposes of identity when they should not have been hearing and secondly we have a witness coming in testifying falsely about the identity  opportunity to hear the testimony of renee torrance versus adriana ella vera the jury should have had that opportunity to weigh the credibility of those witnesses to make a determination if they weren't given that opportunity petition the transcript from the report transcripts that the trial court in the spirit court rather said were missing from the initial petition that such the petition that was before the california supreme court was significantly different than the petition that was before we don't look to that well but the the facts before and the company supreme court mainly the supplemental read filed by the petitioner response to the last reasoned decision issued by the the analysis under chatman then it would perhaps in that situation be appropriate for this court to apply the chapman test to that but when one looks at the facts in this case in considering a harmless  analysis and keeping in mind that the district court did erroneous the in my opinion review the review do harms error analysis under the chapman standard the more stringent chaps to the conclusion that it was harmless error under that standard as well and the facts in this case quite simply are are extremely strong when it comes to the identification evidence are vala who is the store clerk and had known the defendant for two or three years had seen them at a pri
reopen alleges ineffective assistance of counsel under a law saga and the precedent decisions of this court we must show prejudiced the prejudice comes again and that there is a case directly recalled having come across a case that dealt with this moral turpitude issue when in fact the case had been issued a few months earlier by counsel did not recall an immigration judge did not appear to be aware of it at that point the immigration statute if you plug those terms even into a google search not even necessarily a legal search engine you would come across the bell transfer rado case which again directly held th attorney's actions constituted ineffective assistance of counsel that he failed to file a brief or to have provided factual legal reasons underlying the appeal  that the appeal notice had said what the issue was on the field so your your position is by saying that the lawyer didn't  before she filed a motion to reopen the case would have been cited and had we not cited it i don't think you could consider it here but i think she did what she was able to do as a pro se appellants well actually i don't think i mean i don't know how the other members of the panel feel but i don't think a party has to cite a particular case for us to consider it we can always consider them to class the administrative remedy you just have to make the contention you know like i was denied this or that right i'd certainly go along with that reasoning of the court and i believe that you're right i'm saying that i can't imagine spiling the motion to reopen without citing to that case myself  because he did not provide legal reasons factual legal reasons he said underlining the appeal should have at least looked at whether or not this crime involve moral turpitude within the ninth circuit they were aware that that was the original issue and they got it wrong the first time and then when she brought it up that her attorney had failed to provide legal reasons underpinning his appeal they feel to look at it again they have two shots at this and move their time again that they even make a minimal effort to determine whether under the law of this  it's hard to resist but even that your client had a strong case what is that of an abuse of discretion if the board doesn't do your client's legal research for the board doesn't have to advocate for her but they are and administrators are here they're judge didn't he didn't make any kind of discretionary type of i think that's bad therefore you don't have moral character determination if he found specifically vacuum vision involves moral turpitude therefore i believe he said i want my hands are tied i am bound to find that you did not possess good moral character under section one hundred one f of the act and so he found her statutorily and able to establish good moral character not not kind of a touchy feely you're me why i'm wrong and that's my feeling is that of a pro se petitioner goes to the board and says my lawyer didn't file a brief that we expect the board to understand what the issue is
c seven ninety one and we have reached the issue in arms each night in fairness i provide you with a shipyard instruction defining who is a federal employee as you know it says there that of a civilian employee and cars i mean employers who are tenant activities inside the shipyard to openly and notoriously discriminate against the handicapped because they cannot get to their work now we've got where handicapped people have rights and yet the navy absolutely totally completely without question controls that and that's discriminatory and if this decision is up held by the court that will cause further discrimination it's really kept in place i don't conceive for a very short period of time to provide computer data entry services that the future of sound evil shipyard the issue in this case then is whether or not mr love has should be considered  correctly decided that he should not when you apply the standards set forth by the supreme court and by this court in determining whether an employee employer relationship exists when somebody  directly hired by a particular company or by the federal government when you apply those standards it is clear that the navy had no control over mr lopez or the work that he perform and in this case that yes it might it be nice if the navy had been able to provide him a parking spot but what we are here today is to decide whether or not they asked lee had to do with the responsibility to do so under the that parking regulations promulgated by the shipyard does not confer employees status on mr lopez there is no authority or honor and i know of no authority for that the parking regulation merely sets out how parking spaces will be allocated at the shipyard and as the court may know sell very precious commodity on the shipyard most people don't get a parking spot there in fact now after nine eleven no one can park on the crevices of the shipyard but these that's just merely a regulation stating how the parking spaces will be allocated who may or may not be entitled to a parking space it certainly does not confer employee will discriminate and not hire a person who's got a disability that could be easily accommodated i don't know what deal with that is that like i do with that by was employed it was approximately two months perhaps if he had been there longer they would have been able to work out a solution for him i mean it wasn't anything that was really drastic because he immediately went through the whole process claiming to be federal employee he didn't try to find an accommodation from his own company it's possible that it and you know i can't really argue the point because i don't know all of the circumstances that might possibly  eight possibly could have given him a job on a day shift he didn't have a problem evidently on the day shift there may have been accommodations that they might have been able to come up for i don't think we can say that because four hard to get him a disability parking place and they they rejected it twice they indicated there was no transportation at the time they hired him they couldn't do the in this case
incorrect standard of review the government argues that mr burris petition with this court must be dismissed because all this case is about is the board's discretionary balancing of the equities and the ultimate determination as to whether mr murray is deserving of a mischaracterize or mis comprehend the issues or to ignore binding precedent and employ a completely in a pluggable standard of review but that's precisely what it did  reviewing the ultimate balancing of the equities about whether somebody should be granted or denied discretionary relief it doesn't bar this court from reviewing questions of pure law it doesn't bar this court from reviewing questions of involving the due didn't even look at this record it didn't understand the judge's decision didn't look at the administrative record that is a due process discretion we agree that the use of this similar language can be misleading however such language is attributable to in our culture rafting rather to a limited review of the record on the part of the board we additionally point out that sometimes the only question raised an appeal to the board is whether the immigration judge quote abused its discretion in this situation our conclusion on the issue might simply represent response  more over the court used to take it in context and in this case the petitioners entire brief and appeal to the board was characterized as one in which the immigration judge abused his discretion in denying it to twelve h waiver and in his appeal to the board he said on three different occasions that the issue presented to the board was well the immigration judge abused his discretion that appears on page twenty two saying it was in eligible for adjustment of status to petitioner appears not to be inadmissible because of this drunk driving history that said page forty one he says although he may be eligible for the relief sought the ultimate denial or granted for lif is a matter of discretion anything else  well you ask yourself ponder that question on your way back to washington
rather answers to his counsel's questions regarding a prior arrest or convictions i believe that i won sixty he said i quote unquote i said it because if you're an embarrassment close quote and also quote fear that's not false testimony in order to have seen an immigration benefit i believe the court was clear that he knew that subject of intense and i would concur with your honor that's on the record is just not clear in that regard when you're confronted with a crime there i mean certainly there's a certain amount of embarrassment and fear if you're confronted with an under oath in court proceeding possibly your honor but i would submit in this case that the the context window and the i j a had was ready to determine that he had lied under oath but now she did not specifically cite to a loved one so opinion immigration benefit but i believe the parties concur that that family and to third parties or some other adverse effect that is what was not specifically inquired into your honor the record is not fully explored in that sense it's a fact issue in the record was not fully fully so i believe whatever the reason why he was afraid or embarrassed was a fully explored on the record perhaps that's where and where does that leave us perhaps a remained to fully explore that issue  getting back to what your honor had asked about why he made those statements i believe that he had given that answer without an opportunity to think through in other words if  in fact i think the record is not clear as to why she denied or gore found that he lacked good moral character she states simply that he lied under oath and that's all she said and secondarily that he had committed a conviction and and i think as we argued in our brief it's important to know that because he provided this testimony during his immigration hearing it's reasonable difficulties and they said that the that he did not a little unusual discussed in the last case the government would have the obligation to show well he lied and here's the evidence to show that he lied and then you have the burden of rebuttal on that and the ultimate burden of proof on showing else the most complete detail about where she had resided during that ten year period we would submit that the record is sufficient to show that she was able to articulate generally where she lived in terms of cities and and with whom she lived and she may not have had exact recall of street addresses during that ten year period but that's reasonable to it's reasonable to presume that given the the lengthy
agent i think the word agent is used anonymously over here with a smuggler i may be mistaken but that was my understanding the real question over here is the indian government would allow him to go the never prosecuted him as computer political opinion if i may agree with you that the average credibility finding is flawed then what happens we send it back to the i j a with directions to reconsider the  the next shot at it to reconsider in light of you know accepting the testimony is true to get to the judge that it has to first through the the eyes i believe that is the correct decision yes thank you thank you i'd like to keep the remainder for sure what was the name of the city statement that way but that coupled with the fact that he seemed to manage to firstly firstly so they came to his house and he encountered them that was in his written statement in this testimony he stated that he escaped every time the police immigration judge looked at his testimony about that situation and found it implausible that they were going to arrest him that the whole problem quite happily quite began with that with a question about truth content versus the meter is that if we don't have any findings as to demeanor
based in contesting governmental action method by by the disparity between the resources and the expertise of the government and individual the arizona supreme court what can be allowed under federal bankruptcy law so i think ninth circuit that we could have laid in wait for them to file an action if the court however if they filed a claim and they were told not to follow to quite they did it one purpose and one purpose only and
just or had to leave but i do want to say for the record that you know the arguments were are available on the internet and so i want to assure you that justice moore has indicated that he will listen to the arguments despite the fact that he was called away so having said that i was preceded  w people were referring to the have two on the left side which is goes up higher behind his ear if memory serves and that and picture that two can be seen in people's exhibit one to one which is in the record it was the last site that was at issue in this case on that issue there were questions about whether or not whatever this was in the record work rather than whether or not this two thousand eight booking photograph was in the record of the record or on the motion for new trial the truck or got into this but what if he said two thousand a booking
standard operating procedures had nothing to do with him as a person and with him looking for meaning any kind of profile he simply did not have his identification card or any other kind of photo id so he goes over he sends them over to secondary he wanted to leave before any one thing began before any time before anything mr al haj told him i want to leave and he didn't let him leave occurring because obviously they tried to get through with no idea they didn't then they didn't want to do their secondary so no idea is a little different than any of the other things that it's not because of the t leave and i don't have to ask anybody mr alcott i asked tell me he had no intention of boarding the plane even if i eat my own hypothetical my own example i walk in and my flight la court told us what is the reasonable search at an airport it has to be no more extensive or intrusive than necessary in light of the current technology to detect presence of weapons or explosives it must be confined in good faith for that purpose and passengers must must be able to avoid searched by electing not to fly and for the next thirteen years the question as to when a person could elect not to fly was not answered and it even when there was nothing affirmatively looking suspicious once you have placed your luggage on that x ray screening you cannot withdraw and that the screeners can screen that that piece of luggage in a secondary search and i think that's where the link is in this case i would submit that in a bright line has to be drawn somewhere and i think in time
turn the power on the barn is located on the right side of the camera now opened it will find there just little screen is located on top of the camera right here after pressing the mode button we would see the following symbols on the screen camera plain edited and manage media this is like humpage we can move around using the location controls and the menu button to select and audio level meters however before start recording make sure that you do the following check here and if you have to you would want to have enough of them if you want to show outside under a bright sunny day you provides additional memory space for your digital camera you should always from other card before you use it for the first time and what you can for myra on your p c it's preferable that you for mother card a new camera so that it is fully compatible with your be deleted and cannot be recovered for this reason we suggest that you save a backup of your as a card on your computer before hand to make sure all these adjustments have been made things flow small and everything is set up correctly make  the option now select the clip you want to view and touch it twice when making a shot it is very important to keep the focus on what we want  by moving the our remote which are located right here so far it seems as we are ready to start shooting but wait what is a film the committee or t v show without a good audio we should not forget about subject you want you seen some control located on the right hand side of the camera right here when you want to record a close up image of an animal or a subject  they keep their focus saying this bottom is located right here sometimes we might encounter issues concerning image quality and brightness we can correct this in two ways one is by adjusting iris control located to what seems in neck of the camera right here however if you are still unsure about the brightness of your image you can always ask for help and more easily use as a restrikes you can do th coming into the camera lens so if you want to shoot outside under a bright sunny day you will probably want to have to enter filter on you have the option to set the empty field or at levels either one two or three these depends on how bright the place where you are shooting s you can adjust the quality of your image by adjusting the gain white balance and share speed you can do this manually  ask them as being in concert with the big stuff compulsive very well certified individuals who will be more than happy to help you in any problem you have
an idea and the way we like to test and see what happens with actually i wrote you for your careers and the first area i'll start with the biggest are these black circles and those are just identifying areas for
lot one as it stands as well as from the neighbor across the street where the tappan will be located written permission to have already been granted for that we are working with the survey to finalize the meets and downs and the goal is that those will be executed and recorded before council will vote on that on the twenty seventh in addition to that we are securing the planning modules the required authorities and we expect those to be completed and submitted to the township by august twentieth as well as every other comment that it's prepared in the townships memorandum  signature block for the peters creek sanatorium forty for them to sign off on the final plan as well all of the conditions that the planning commission office has provided we will be able to to meet