my best not to go home or don't read them in this case we had a one day trial it was a one issue trial and we really only one set of facts in this struggling with the nicest way to use the discretion because the court is going a way that the factors under five for a and it's very difficult for the court to weigh the factors or it's very difficult for us to review the weight representations in here are true and accurate there was evidence as to the fair market value the judge said there is no evidence as to what car she has it's right in the affidavit it's enough to value seventeen jeep patriot it's not we don't know if it just ability through social security i think the court should not look at that that was part of the if i judge if i may just go two minutes or less further to get to that point my argument i'm going to address that serious statements which i don't think are supported by the law page twel testimony in which my client has defined as to the number of illnesses you had the number of drugs she was taking the pain in her joints the fact that she had noise of the fact that she and i'm in our pass she was not able to work and she testified it's not going to get any better now when i'm trying to prove that my client does not have the ability to work my burden is a preponderance of the evidence w have here and the judge said there was no doctor's notes there was no matter how passionately there was no cooperation but the husband basically exactly that was my next point when i said it's one issue one day one yes yes where did you have a lawyer no i didn't have one then i have one now what's the status of the of the appeal she said she didn't know how the court could give it any weight at all because she makes the question you talk about what's the standard of review for this matter is it is the abuse of discretion we're talking about means we're not talking about findings of fact we're talking about whether marina should be allowed to work tonight so you have a woman who is upping the years who obviously has many many health is on disputed mental health not excuse not mental health issues medical health issues and she insane we're this isn't a question of making up the illnesses eat again we take her back to these illnesses are that doesn't change whether or not she's evil to work able to support herself the judge address have is that there are all to go well with the credibility that ultimately goes to your i would argue that it shouldn't affect the results here because of the standard of review which is the abuse of discretion but if we do talk specific reason is there are what are the specific reasons we know they have to consider the fact you know they have to sort of credibility so how was that properly done or why are you saying it would probably be honored if you if you read the entire memorandum decision  mysterious in the known how does a court then determine that in this case here there wasn't  and she testified that ok and there was some question about this this income i'm this mysterious income how was she supporting yourself like if i recall the testimony as i recall her she considered the party's condition or circumstances on the date of the mirror the judge did that and it paid sixty two of the record mr purple asked the question was asking a question of relevance of the merits of mr kapil or previous h and of course if you asked her and she said she was unable to work on the date of this marriage right mr pearl the court she's entitled to work now i don't want to i don't want to say i don't care but i don't think it's wrong but of course it's up i asked my clients who were sitting tight i don't care if they're poor or not put on the student time you're going to come to court with me i think it's respectful to the court it's almost as if to support again by pulling out a twenty mile per hour i have no idea where the comes from other evidence present other than your testimony and we've already read the briefs in the record the judge had decided this issue based on credibility so if so how did it how do you make th said the testimony as your finances is shady it doesn't add up i don't find you your credibility is poor best as to finances she never questioned my client's or forty i'm sorry credibility