you please the court i am can gauge on behalf of eighteen to be your honour's the facts of this case compel the result reached by the district court and i believe compel affirms by this court the plaintiff concedes that she read the offer it made clear to her and therefore we must assume that if she did not want to arbitrate future claims with her employer there was one simple thing for her to do and that was she chose not to thousands of people chose to opt out it was a very simple process and so there's only one reasonable factual conclusion to draw and that is that she made a conscious decision recognize they are not binding on this court but we have a number of trial court decisions where trial courts in the commonwealth how many while courts the district court the federal court has applied puerto rico law under very similar circumstances just like this in that the employer told its employees it's your choice it's your choice you don't have to agree with us if you do not want to agree you must stop out and in all of those instances but court look to the court the decisions of several other circuits applying state law to decide what's an offset what sufficient consideration known to puerto rico law and that people's actions can constitute acceptance of a contract and we are not talking about a situation here ours where these are arms is an arm's length transactions between the parties even in her complaint your honour's she points to policies that the company violated so clearly there is an ongoing relationship in the year prior to the point this was rolled out and offered t directly the evidence shows that over twenty other company policies were communicated to employees in this way this is not two people passing on the street and the plaintiff don't want to participate opt out she admitted we did not opt out from that the court properly drew conclusion that she agreed to this and we believe that there is not clear error in that decision because the facts support it we believe that this court has looked to other courts of appeals in other jurisdictions not civil law jurisdictions again in soho this court looked to a number of other court of appeals decisions applying others states laws to decide whether continued employment was sufficient consideration and found that it was to decide whether mutuality of obligation was sufficient consideration and if so for this court found that it was it looked to those other jurisdictions we are not here asking this or to i doubt an unusual rule we're not asking this court to adopt brief and as the not just a court said the ninth circuit said again it is applying it is applying california law and not the law of the commonwealth of puerto rico but the court there s the import of silence in the face of easy path of opting out this is a quote was as a parent as if he signed his consent to factual conclusion and that is what we believe the district  thousands of people opted out because she didn't opt out we didn't go into the record put into the record what was required but it was literally required your honour's a couple of pieces of information the person's name in the employee id thousands of people opted out and many did not and many many courts have enforced this agreement because of the factual conclusion that if someone read this clearly and unequivocally explained to them that this is a policy this is a program that the company has going forward to resolve disputes between employer and the employees and it is a mutual obligation and therefore after that deadline expires certainly understood that any peculiar rules for employment situations relating to arbitration or employment disputes those if they are applied to a contract that is governed by the are are preempted according to the supreme court's long list of cases finding f a a preemption for rules that this favor arbitration so yes there are many states that have adopted those but those was in fact the state of york has recently adopted one relating to sexual harassment claims it carves out it does not apply to those that are governed by the f a a and this one is government get there thank you  will take a brief let's say five minute recess before we move to the next case