standing of the highest courts of the district of columbia and virginia i have knowledge of her credentials and i am satisfied that she possesses the necessary qualifications thank you for your emotion and i would like to had the congratulations and welcome my colleagues on the court we hope to see you here with regularity at social functions when your client grieved at least a piece of the case then that bars any jurisdiction in the board and it struck me that the arbitrator would have had authority  that point which is you believe because can't be shown simply on the basis of the conviction yes because the record according to the mirror that the employer here cause would exist for a ten supports the board's determination that mr pitman failed to demonstrate that the bureau of prisons had moved him from his position as a correctional officer because of his military service and maybe to use airplanes a claim that must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the military military service article ninety two specifications stated that mr pitman is derelict in the performance of his duties by failing to safeguard the physical health welfare and treatment of iraqi prisoners article number one twenty eight which is the second  this off and he was not serving in his position in any capacity at metropolitan detention center when he was in the military doing his military duty he was clearly off duty he was charged with off duty misconduct because the conduct that you gauged in iraq was a function of his duties in the metropolitan detention center therefore it's all duty for his position as a correctional officer that's what they need my after the misconduct on their reference to off duty is not a reference to off duty as an prisoners was not part of the duty that the united states government where i was a taxpayer charged with the war in iraq that was something that he did that was not part of his activities is it in the military is sentient activities if it had been sanctioned then why did the military court of justice conviction for this behavior chapter forty three and here that's exactly what happened he was removed for cause as the more correctly found he had committed criminal acts while he was sort of in the military and this would be considered off to be his conduct the also the people are talking about the military are serving honorably for our conference and that they're not engaged in criminal activity to get convicted for such activities while they are servants for our country and that was honorably discharged and that they come back to work and for some reason they have no relationship to anything they're far right as i read this nature of the pension explanation if you had if you had the work in new york the circumstances of the incident would have been considered by the deciding nothing on duty officer in the metropolitan prison got a misdemeanor conviction ten dollar fine for a lawyer was the only trained person hindsight anorak which was required to supervise soldiers in this context so had never been trained for what they were doing well that's what i said he didn't properly supervised they were not trained they with most extreme that would be why i mean to do it i'm not doing it for fun i mean i'm doing it because our job is to try to figure out what congress really man as i have a hard time myself believing the congressman pedophiles got to come back and work in schools for a