MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
could and i believe that in this case the information that was raised in the second grit was not readily available to lionel palmer that he went through two separate murder trials the second one was after his read was filed in the placer county homicide which is what's before you now all sorts of come to light to mr thome or so when he files his successor for second rip about this it appears that under the authorities that are cited here he should have been allowed to proceed the  facts underlying the conviction are such that as things developed shown in the second read all sorts of mistakes were made in the handling of the case by the district thanks trial was unfair remember this was a self defense issue he didn't dispute shooting john madden's the key questions were who had the gun whether meadows was violent toward other people and therefore logically against all murder to support his claim form or got him self in trouble not only by being with john meadows and killing john meadows but also by burning the body the evidence that the state brought and the first trial that this person was somehow burned alive is the kind of thing that would make any juries hair stand on  that wasn't true they brought in a gun when everything was finished and you know accounting what happened was it turned out that the police were used pressuring an individual he brought on the wrong gun they said no no that's not what we want what we need is this type of gun and lo and behold he brings that type of gun a few days later and suggested that situation of finding evidence of deliberately none of that was before the court now that was before the jury all that is why we believe that the second richard had been fully heard on the merits and that the petition should have been granted  that there were several things from the cumulative effect of all of them undercut the prosecution case significantly and i think that this is just now i factual determination by you based on
who initially valuated him and as a result he was committed to a church two year sentence commitment rather than the task of our state hospital that commitment term expired on november nineteenth two thousand and four twenty one cover part of third twenty one came out last month the court in that case confirmed that for the extension of a commitment period for someone who is being held under the sexually violent predators act the state evaluation that's even one year old is considered stale and the state cannot look back and rely on the evaluations that were conducted at the initial phase of the confinement so if this quote if mr prevail in his section one thousand nine hundred three claimed and
hi i just thought you might want to go to that party oh i do i do we've got some work to do we've got to get you ready all but i wasn't invited to the party i probably thought i'd rather play basketball or go fishing or where you've been don't blame you no one likes to sit and wait for a party just don't party can't really get going until everyone around us so whenever you go to a party cindy always be on time and when the clock says it's time to go home or she's only kidding you don't tease him make fun of others not even your very best friends they might not understand why they thought you were serious their feelings  be considerate of others so have fun together clean and neat and to be on time and will be considered as others too will join in the game and to obey the rules and make fun for everybody not son of anybody or be too noisy or too rough and  your always have friends because parties are fun when everyone is considerate of other good bye now don't go  by so early this morning to tell you about it oh yes oh thank you thank you so much
satisfied until a bottom to forty nine gold rush when they found they couldn't get rich and the other way they were discovered gold pile of gold the last that everybody was busy digging and digging when there was no bone left they found it was stuck with west every crowd carried around here and presto every road carries a crowd just about when you think you got the hang of it your run of the lombard street which not only goes down around and around
court with the opportunity to clarify event transferred to trigger the presumption of aggregate aggravation under section eleven fifty three to this day there really isn't any clear guidance  records pertaining to the manifestations of disability prior to during and subsequent to serve exactly so that that iran that where they say i'm on the basis of all the evidence of record that includes more than just the evidence that the better my put in that there was an event in service that related to the disability i believe that the more reasonably process rather than treating the presumption self well you're going to get the only get there were you get the presumption as a basis of the concession that the disability them and trial when they were trying to rebut the presumption those are the facts all the only thing they can only way they can present rebut the presumption or to show that there was this natural progression of the at this period of time during your i apologize or i'm getting to the point that we relied on joyce was that there is a way of evidence that can occur now does there have to be a written finding a mat there is a two step process under the law that exists at the time for the presumption of activation to attach is that first there has to be a finding that there was a big increase in the disability and what the what the for the veterans who were found was yes is too high for the veteran to prove that the increase of disability that they don't get the benefit like what is the benefit of the presumption the benefit is that they don't have to show once they just once the veteran establishes that there was a disability a permanent this increase in their disability for whatever reason they don't have to show a connection to their service it is then incumbent upon the secretary to show where yes there is a are veterans who experienced a flare ups symptomatic episode episodes immediately following combat or being a prisoner of war it will be presumed other and they will get the presumption back they shot at that point current claim that he is raising now that before the board of the veterans court the argument was that the level of evidence was undebatable with regards to increase in service area increase in disability and here the nature of the argument has we do believe those are those are different argument statute of the title required a specific finding and his analysis was that the specific finding to meet that standard there had these something in writing and they didn't do that in this case so therefore they didn't apply the presumption correctly and as far as the argument to the veterans court it's absolutely clear we made two arguments we made a factual argument and we made a legal argument about  and if you look at our brief of the veteran support it's only a record to thirty two to thirty seven to forty three to forty six clearly make a legal argument that  there's nothing further away the rest of my time ok thank you for
standing on your head and seeing the world upside down in this
service and shooting him and so what it showed after math was that family was shot in the back three times and then on the ground five more times the police department jason anderson  had had maintained their round and saying that the reason why they initially stopped in pursuit family was because they said that he had a gun anderson said that he was shooting family because his life was a evidence on it no kind of trace evidence there is no blood no fiber no fingerprints no smudges on the gun the gun also wasn't turned into evidence until seventy two hours after he after he died and moreover the gun that was found next to his body was stolen in two thousand and four and the previous owner testified that it had been recovered by the police and had been held in police custody up until then which highly strongly indicates that the gun with planted that that this was the cover up generation of the grandsons of the secret army the sacrifice to save the backs of soldiers and shooting teenagers in the back would never achieve a medal of bravery and most thought he know that they took the city of minneapolis to court many times and the law asked every single time but continue pursuing different ways of different ways of finding a path to justice for their son and so it went all the way to the supreme court and the supreme court made a decision not to hear the case  one day this these instances what will not be happening anymore when you when a situation like this doesn't get justice you know there's a sense of you know how can we succeed in  society that is stacked against the asian american and so or just someone of color or to someone that lives our young person i was a minneapolis area and whether it's you know  through the court system eventually or whether it's through people and community members individuals feeling empowered and saying you know we've had enough and and and demanding for some some real change in terms of the way conspiracy stand with me because the next tragedy could be in your family so we suffocate from this case skeptical the breed and only justice will give us the accident to be treated like human beings in the memory of injustice
twenty dash one hundred and ninety two for nneka technologies persist united states and we've got only the government arguing this morning on the side of the appellant to petition our please proceed by issuing an injunction to put in force the court did not rely on it or even really address it yeah i'm not clear i have the same question that judge laurie had this is judge proust and i'm not quite clear on what you're telling us i mean this is the government debriefing letter wouldn't you at least agree that this language isn't perfectly clear and create some lack of clarity at least in terms of the statutory deadlines i mean the government presumably has authority to stop using that but isn't it as much as it did in this case does it not create some ambiguity i think that there was a certain amount of consternation one when the letter  surfaced and i think there were people talking about how to write it more clearly however and i think that has happened oh ever in the same paragraph there's an express reference to the class deviation the contractor in this case how can the contractor already essentially gotten all that he would have gotten under that kind of equitable public reading because he did get the stay and the like i guess what i'm getting at is your appeal here is to get us to interpret the language of the statute as a matter of law on the language and not on specific factual context right participate and that raised in the brief i think the matter was done to the president well i guess what i'm getting at be because you know obviously they didn't participate because they didn't have any reason to participate and support a congress has indicated a great interest in the area and has taken great pains to be very precise in what the rules should be what the deadline should be and the agency was able to do various workarounds but nonetheless in this case and in many cases the application of that to german stay as very serious and significant consequences and  congress put in place very strict that the deadlines and has given very careful attention to exactly what the rules should be in this case  porter can i just clarify one thing if they had asked for or if they had had supplemental questions within two days after the fairly easy to construe and i don't think that the plain meaning is difficult to discern and certainly the department of defense in drafting a class deviation which lies
listen to the sound of the sun and the stars sound picked up from outer space by radio telescope for some the mystery of the great unknown is being explored unendingly by american engineers hoping to find practical application for improvements in all of our lives and way with freedom of american future but what makes an engineer a mathematical mind college degree player for tinkering curiosity each progressive achievement is the work of inspired individuals with the constructed capacity to join the efforts of all for the meeting that comes from human challenge to give all of us what we need and want and produce for people at a price each person accepting these challenges of human desire and the engineers who knows what is wanted leaves the way for the men who know how to build it to accommodate our constantly increasing popula the american engineer is a leader who has proved printed the skylines of modern progress to the highest standard of living in the history of the world city structured of metal every american the city's speeds ahead with the blessing of invention of mass production and construction made possible by the ingenuity of american engineer the resources of the nation and the requirements of its people are a challenge to every engineer metallurgical mechanical electrical chemical civil mining and all the other engineers working together to build the industry of the united states of america modern mining engineer comes up with the raw materials of civilization metals or nonmetallic petroleum natural gas sand or cold salt or d the chemical engineer is himself a catalytic agent changing the very composition of matter to make more and more conveniences and luxuries in the continuing creation of the scientific world out of natural
not just today in this hearing but as we go forward to continue the dialogue with the irs and all interested parties to make sure we do much better in protecting the american taxpayers protecting our citizens against this type of fraudulent conduct  unanimous consent to recognize a member of our appropriations committee including one who serves on the committee with oversight over funding regarding the internal revenue service a gentleman who has had a good number of constituents florida has been one of the most affected areas really in the country when it comes to irs identity theft issue what you don't know i am sure is that i years ago was also a victim of identity theft now i was one of the lucky ones and it wasn't the irs issue that we are dealing with but i can tell you what a nightmare it is to deal with if it does happen to you it is bad enough going through this traumatic event of having your identity stolen but then to find out that even a federal agency cannot protect you against identity theft frankly is just beyond disheartening the fact that so many people who this happens to is frankly intolerable unacceptable and i think we can all agree that the irs has been slow frankly very slow to respond not only to the individual identity theft issue but also just overall  how if you use your credit card and you go to a gas station that you don't go to a lot or you travel or you use it twice in a gas station like i have done when i will fill up my tank and then i will fill up my wife's tank on one credit card you will get a call from the credit card company a red flag goes up and this happens kind of regularly and obviously we don't expect the irs to be perfect but clearly there must be a better detailed plan to prevent further fraud issues from taking place and also a plan as t is a big problem nationally and as bad as identity theft is when it happens with the irs and when people who work hard pay their taxes play by the rules and all of a sudden their refund checks go to some crook it makes a horrible crime
i remember an uncle of mine whom i love very much live by the sea and i open spent all day on the beach with him just walking along like the smoke cigars and each time he took one out he asked me the same question do you like music yes i'd say years later that memory made me start smoking robert byrd this is the robert burns canada and especially wonderful cigar with a rich uncomfortable taste because the tobacco is our nature filtered for mildness better taste no artificial quick curing for robert burns every leaf is slow cured in clean air why don't you smoke the robert burns cigars they come in five different shapes from two for a quarter to twenty five cents
statute by pointing a firearm is extraneous and is not an element of this statute this court need consider the court the supreme court in madison united states defined elements as what is required by the prosecution to prove or conviction so that it was possible for the conduct of leaving to qualify as a conviction under the indiana pointing a firearm statute review of the fact that these cases indicate that it is not necessarily true  going to inter hurt both parties agree that it's a debatable statute and what ellis was convicted of was making a threat against someone who's a law enforcement officer that's felony and not a violent felony so using not a violent felony under the arc or criminal act yes the elements under pointing a firearm statute in indiana do not require the phrase force they don't require the state to prove for dangerous weapon toward another and the court did conclude that both of the prongs satisfied of the use of physical force under the sentencing guidelines definition by comparing the pointing to a missouri which stated that  somebody is pointing a gun convictions and without examining the particularized conduct of the defendant specifically in that example demonstrating the use of a gun to someone else which is not permitted under the categorical approach it's impossible to determine whether or not
belmont that had full liquor and we invited them back because about two months ago i happened to swing by and i noticed they were open for lunch and i stopped in with a guest i had from italy actually in my wife and we had a phenomenal lunch in fact my talian guest had the panini classic of which he said was as good as anything he's ever eat in the middle east so that's quite a compliment because i know this guy is a very
money so beautiful i really don't know pay we'll have a two car garage
mister there was evidence of his intoxication at the time of the crime his counsel requested instructions be given and the instructions were not given because the judge felt that mr abdullah himself just did or did not personally provide evidence of his if there is evidence in four point two one if there is evidence of intoxication then the instruction should one be near enough if in other words if the only evidence here was that it got down to a cafe and had a beer with that be enough to get the instruction i would say perhaps not but i think that's my concern let me explain is that i don't see that there's a lot more here he said he and there was no evidence regarding the medical effect other than the person who testified from the criminology lab who indicated that it was possible that four hours earlier he was intoxicated he didn't dismiss that out of hand and while i know that the evidence is not strong in favor of intoxication i think that once the instruction was request language in cases like people versus car where the california supreme court said that merely showing that the defendant consume alcohol prior to commission of the crime without showing the fact of the alcohol in him is not sufficient to warrant an instruction or want to diminish capacity what do we do with my with like that i believe and i may be wrong but my recollection of people versus karr was that it had to do with this to a spontaneous so there was some evidence maybe that went along the lines as this case but but the attorney did not make a request and then it was brought to the
fresh cut flowers and soup sure it's a good spring same dish a bowl of the latest taste the most delicious chicken noodle you ever had and you make it out of an envelope that comes in a box like that lipton chicken noodle soup there are three and reloads in it that's the thing of the whole business  everything is on the board those are all the brains that look to make it help out some of the chicken noodle soup for spring you cook it in ten minutes makes four to six servings each depending on whether you really love super smart a little bit all you want all you want it's just a little cup a little bow and you start the meal it's good for you inside it's plenty of it's there and it's delicious really delicious because you make it yourself like you do all the other lipton soups lipton chicken noodle onion soup green teas soup these vegetable soup what's  vegetable so that's green tea so probably they're all good and the reason is the good is that what you buy here are ingredients it's not a canned so that you just add water the you cook things these are ingredients it takes eight to ten minutes depending on the kind of so you cook it yourself the tone made and therefore it has that place and it has the flavor of the kind of soup that ordinarily if you would have make it the old fashioned way would take hours of simmering on a hot stove all day you do it in ten minutes sure i know when you go in the grocery store there are all those and it is so easy to pick up you have to go way on down till you find the lipton envelopes but do it one time remember to do it once and try it i think you'll stick with it's you'll find that the difference is worth the little extra effort right fifty to sixty years ago people were introduced to peanut butter for the first time they looked it over carefully practically nothing in common with the old style product
town and get my car already
children and remember that every child is the makings of an emergency so we have just an ordinary day ordinary traffic any number of these drivers are potential killers here's one of them he doesn't look like he isn't driving recklessly he's just an ordinary driver driving with ordinary care on ordinary tires when suddenly ahead of him there's a child killed or injured every three minutes more than four hundred a day one out of every three school age children who die in traffic accidents is why ordinary tires are not  not long ago we came through a shattering world war and yet dreadful as that was in peaceful america we kill or injure nearly as many every year on the highway as the total number of americans killed in both world war don't trust your luck insist on tires you can trust everybody knows us most are well scared but they don't like to move tires anymore all tires have knobs good designs one kind or another but sometimes kids are better than others you're right surface general squeegee tire wipes a claim drive truck and mark this stops quicker than tires with any other tread to see the difference here is an ordinary tire with a conventional nonskid tr been squeezed together till it's practically a smooth those old time smooth time now let's apply the brake on this general super squeegee say that it's the recollection that wipes a clean dry a crack for a quick straight stop what you want to know how these tires compare an actual service that's what we're about to show you will skip the slower speed stops and get right down to the top one on a wet and slippery street at sixty miles an hour tires double your ha there are other important things in addition the stop ability you get when you put on a set of general super squeegee very tender buildings you get enough more rain on cords per square inch in a general to equal to extra ply extra ply that tangible protection ordinary tires a build with a safety factor of seven our last gen super squeegees are built with a safety factor of twelve point eight general eighty two percent greater safety factor that means eighty two percent greater protection nearly twice as strong as ordinary tires against the jars and bumps you're