MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
hello belmont how are you tonight what a nice night we have good to see you all here again how many of you been here for from i've been before the job of going on sambal zero fifty nine million of you excellent well it's nice to be back again we got a beautiful night propagand back i brought sandy back she was here a couple of years ago sandberg roshan is singing with us we're going to play a song or two before we bring her up and tim mears on saxophone  that he does to prepare all the concerts that go on oh summer long here and wednesday nights and we're being sponsored by best care you can see their table over here to our right he's going see them get some information about them they're going to come up  later to talk to you let you know about what's going on but we're going to play some fun music for you tonight a little bit of jazz movement a swing and yeah let's get started being here with us every year are you enjoying to have a good time could we ask for a better night this is about as perfect as it gets for night time concert them goodness knows ten thirty that we're going to be there and we have one more song point i'm making so much for coming out thank you tommy olsen for having us every year keeping this going for twenty five
in this in this case this is never found the object if you want it he came here there was no prior discussion with anybody except with himself i was going to commit a burglary of this jewelry store and he couldn't find it if he came up and that was it there was no place for him to burgle he didn't know where he was going in this case here the first step is not getting there the first step and the chords that is if you just have the sense to talk and you never get in the car and go out to find the child you think you're communicating with and that's it that's the end and it's time i don't know the record doesn't tell us he doesn't show for if you believe that they knew he could not disagree that's true but it doesn't show affirmatively that it could not i don't know if a cur mr wilton one can sell guns between parties legally if both parties have no idea cards again it's the police now they were dealing with a woman who was it who probably again the record does not show whether or not she could legally have a national id card would be fair to say that based on what the police knew at the time the defendant conversation about the sale of a controlled substance if those it is inherently illegal to transfer cocaine under any circumstances i suppose unless you're a physician with a prescription and it is inherently illegal to have sex with a fifteen year old  because it's with a minor but you don't have to say specifically you know what type of sexual acts you're going to have with the minor before you do it it's a minor was even going to agree to pay for it you don't have to takes out a roll of bills and he says no what kind of comedy is something and the guy would have said i don't have the gun with me but it's over here in the trash bin on the other side of the mall of the of driving around aimless many he couldn't locate where he wanted to go he came out here he asked for directions i need to know where i coming he had the directions written down he told the police who he was there to me and why he was there to meet her and that makes it more of a substantial step than what happened in chester smith it's to the steelers review i don't think that i think it is there were three phone calls that day and even though avery may have an issue that i think is irrelevant rather she that she approached him versus him i mean he could have just said no no i can't do that and that would be the end of it illegal because he's a convicted felon he's not allowed to do that just like you're talking hypothetically with what you think is a fifteen year old having sex with a fifteen year old is inherently illegal and by the fact that he is a convicted felon do you have to be to meeting with a fifteen year old in order to have sex with her or yourself but you don't need to done so to speak separated from the home they have to entering a home that would apply in this case so he gets in a car and every five commits along the way has to be joined i don't know i would necessarily agree with that and so and
recall is that they do fill out some type of loan application to make sure their vehicle doesn't have certain modifications or something on it and just their name address and i believe that type of thing i don't think they go through a very formal z the way this contract is written a guy selling tickets one hundred yards away from this could potentially be resistant because he's taking part in this event that the way that the plaintiffs are in this they're going by the dictionary term to take power and could literally be anyone it could be a spectator technically the spectators taking part in it then they paid money they have a ticket they're watching without spectators there is no way that you know it's all put to first everything's paid probably think is it makes it that for all and that it could in capsule a vendor who strictly working because of that event that that i think they are taking part in and i think they are involved in a way in the event and this particular does these types of events post these types of things they don't pay their volunteers that hell do they think that they are now going to be on the hook if an accident happens and they get her i don't believe so and really once again if we go back to a participant and had his change or they had it in the contract i don't know i'm sort of like a pusher you know on the street guard race cars things to push truck now he's essential because if the cars don't start they can't have a risk right so i don't know what do they change but the push truck operator was not a participant back in illinois at some time and later i don't think he came with a change of policy you know that i have no idea because there are some cases on
approach not going anything is like
references to the pla the court stated the words finding this word i'm most agreement trading activity has some relevance to the circumstances that surrounding the signing of these agreements in january two thousand and one and then goes on to say but at the court's focus is more next thing that that mr martin addresses repeatedly is this with wiring and that there will be some bit i think there is a bit of a confusion here between what would be a will contest standard
cases it seems he did there's just a general allegation of brevity made in fish there is nothing in those cases saying the state accurately pursuing their obligation to work towards the service of the state says well they respond doesn't cooperate with
court set the matter on january fifth two thousand and four and eric grind represented her and he could not be available on that day it gets to september and at that point the parties appear no transcript we don't really know what went on but there's no order in the order says  a final and i don't feel judgment any arguments that well the calculation really should have been thirty two thousand which actually been this amount and there were some periods in which i was living here and there i think a before a court so there you just have this by no judge is a little trickier because the two thousand and nine were doesn't actually just consist of the two thousand and four judgment and interest in the two thousand and four judgment there's one other thing for me to then work which is support by its own terms to being and beans while the child was living with suggests the child is no longer living there but i think the important part is that there's a just in two thousand and judgments included why necessarily imply and child was actually living powder or anything of that nature so i'd suggest that the entire amount that's sassed in the
had not been anywhere near a knowledgeable on it until i started researching this case and it's a difficult way it is it's difficult because what i see is a number of cases where people are the obviously the will of the circuit and to our offer in this district and throughout the state is they are it takes a request for a mechanics for a sworn statement to trigger the responsibility to g request was i want to see what you're charging me because this was a contract for construction costs plus a reasonable fee money to pay if necessary so contractors if somebody is asking for documents because they think the overcharge then has nothing to do with the sworn statement and i think if you have somebody is asking for something that's going to trigger a procedural requirement that he has a dire consequences if you don't fulfill it i think that there has to be out of a couple statement by the person i think if you  been some confusion what is interesting to me is if you will be asked to the first case that started all this year feel like three and if you read their case the next two cases really don't follow they are rules and violation because in  we want to make sure that even though we're denying the mechanics something which is and this is the two paragraphs at the end of the opinion we want to make sure the contractor gets paid he's entitled for his work somehow one say we play the game and people to do work don't get paid i think always the contractor gets paid the question is whether they have only and where they can after so i slowly if they're providing services here and i think it's foregone conclusion that the that except for this technicality he would have won this case and i believe that the court has to look them in the first wave of the evidence into the record and show that there was a performance or substantial situations where we're looking somewhat for pleading to trade rooms versus this is a case that went to trial this is a case where the court heard everything this is a g i mean we're not clear on that they can't raise it now so that the pokers when you look at the air the purpose of the act in no case is to say we're going to protect the builder
night native language my young you see he hasn't been out of this little village in over twenty years but he's well versed in languages and the classic educated chinese gentleman yes you know nothing of and this trip to america will broaden his education will pick him even more imminently to return and continue your missionary work among it's always been my ambition for him but to eat this mission to do that he must marry therefore a visit to america is necessary for him to find a market for his children oh yes but on the other hand i have another duty to my father in china it is his weeks that our family perpetuate his mission me and therefore i came to america simply to find a mother for my children but i would like to ask you a question yes she seems so out of place here you know  oh all right ye well of course i know it was just a show but we meant to do right by all you mean you nominated me because i was more likely to be defeated than anyone else this is politics you pull your son now we've got to be reasonable we helped  talking to the newspapers oh i'm talking to you why do you think with a chance to do some good in this town is i'm going to pick up my tail and run you better and you realize mr martin that this town is filthy i hardly know which way to turn next to a method of government so complicated i cannot understand but you do understand the difference between like this is always simply continue to  you can't get over the telephone but the lady was merely expressing her gratitude for i would like to explain bank right away i'm coming down there with a couple of friends of mine now mr wheeler i'm just going to call your bluff well since you're so confident perhaps you'd like to have a newspaper men present bring them along they can publish a story that was quite your dirty rules  very personal nature i bet it does say some why didn't you tell me it's certainly roses monkey give me that and it was to me and i this is going too far just a moment mr why are you afraid to open this i cannot corruption and any crime gone punts in this city if any of your guilty don't know who is guilty of these crimes i confess you not care to confess you'll be executed i fail to accomplish anything with your american methods say when you make up your mind is made up misspent i want to what the boys do
mostly marijuana about seventy in those individuals never even mention this are misusing their prescription medication and that would be your only your way but also another class the patch that you've heard about this is the streets illicit drugs that come from labs in mexico and another place however many of these others are prescription they're  drug use disorder of any kind of a thousand you still are three and four have witness someone having you know that's important because there's an intervention they're going to talk about this as well so we're seeing particularly in terms of being people fifty years old or fifty years old or who are overdosing from prescription medications the problem here in pennsylvania something that came out of  is that people with all the use disorders or all other sudden use orders they do want to change i know we've labeled them in this country is being lazy manipulating we have all these really nasty labels of them but  ensure we solve the problem we didn't realize who created with the run that's actually how our whole heart and all the other drugs come to be an addiction it doesn't actually start out that way it solves the problem so  l drugs solve problems short term that's why we never get addicted to things like broccoli the broccoli didn't solve the problem it doesn't taste good going on like this is to real don't care about our health even until it gets in the way of what we want in life when we start doing things it's because our health slows down and we can see that those parents are employees or for me i can no longer  and then lastly the new year's resolution we all have them and most of us that new year's resolutions be in about twenty four hours but it is valuable and you know all of us we were motivated to do that where we were and again this is why we recommend medication and also psycho social treatment a doctor rule or invention that they need collimation but absent based treatment a low doesn't seem to help with  presentation for some reason we lower our tolerance to opiates faster than any other drug and within about five days our level tower for opioids has dropped significantly the which drug affects children i mean i'm a pregnant woman is it alcohol or thinks i'm worse or is it the
that provides that the blood sample should be collected using proper medical  reaching its conclusion stated in a courtroom to the reasoning in morals recording the reasoning morris leads to the conclusion that the trial court's ruling allowing the the state so that the police knew that the hits that they were ordering contained alcohols obs and promulgated revision to its rule that said that gave out a notice the disaffected in the dui shall be alcohol free now if we're trying to shed some light on what's proper medical technique according to the illinois state police proper medical technique is to
place the property in deep water the whole occurrence can only take place when the system now functions and there's water range creating property damage in probably for sure with the courts as well this real estate agent there's is probably the most the cases most on point and  corporation then it would have been used exclusively for corporate business and although she testifies internet position that she had the other two vehicles for personal use and she testifies that he saw horses and everything else were in a truck this
currently on the chamber's board of directors and serve as chairman of this else along small business and also as a chairman of the labor relations committee on health reform as you know small businesses have a hard time finding affordable health same insurance policy might cost twice as much in one state as in the next but small businesses generally cannot purchase policies across state lines even worse small business streamlined way of pulling together  just quantity of care to improve care coordination and to explore bundling payments reduce hospital and more we support robust implementation of health information technology and increase affordable the exchange will be a powerful tool for connecting individuals and small businesses with insurance and helping them to find the best policy but it should be up to the employer whether or not to should be refundable flexible and applied to a large swath of small business not just the smallest micro business there are steps in the wrong direction as well referred to a shared responsibility twenty two percent even worse we've been informed this morning that the rates are set to increase by another nine percent in august of this year how can health insurance  insured individuals and families the plan proposed by senator baucus as an example implementing a national insurance exchange including a public option would be a good way to make this happen however the public option we need real affordability of real choices now a central question is should the reform include a public trial insurance option i say yes let the small business owner decide what works for us to keep what we have if because i guess walking into the room i thought i was going to hear sort of a uniform response but even more now than i did when i walked in quite frankly but that's what this debate thank you madam chairman and thank you all so much for coming here today this is such an important topic and having been a small business owner i can remember i remember the struggles of trying to find a health care plan i got up to fifty  resides with the individual not could still reside with the employer but right now we really don't have incentives to the individual to purchase their own insurance and maybe if any of you like to comment on that please i think it's a grand we looked into it
also he has to show because of principle here control over here which is you know here we control he has to be with regard to the thing i was involved in the accident and has control over the trial in here was no such control in this case detailed evidence in this case whether in agencies it is is a question fact from the jury in question the court is already the recognition of that particular fact here we have three murders we also have a special the rule of law here which is the facts always have to be considered in all the circumstances would be way to go there particularly applies to this case and this was not just in would your ship in case here in the evidence is abund and it is regarded as being simply be a legal fiction for the purposes not the piece of substantive declaration that once you have one less see who is responsible because the c e o for all sudden nobody else can be making sure that there is that the right amount potatoes were were put in the truck not too many not too little so it's ultimately getting back to the driver and i think that's where these documents could could reference the driver because the driver is going to do the job but the day people can shift around you you're not making those painters your agent you're giving the instructions to your term tractor is to what he's got again or she's got to get his painters to do because that's those are the
numbers but those of those clinics another part of their focus will be learning collaborative because we also believe that there are places that have a really what the this is most my my opinion on it though is that most of those areas are places that where they don't have a methadone clinic where they don't have a few say you know broken this and this is working well it shows to me in addition treatment we don't have that sort of long term models and that is what we would mean so what is so once a trial out of trial there is a lot of opportunity right now there are a lot of things that at least as of today that the better about are putting money on the table for us to
without authority and second under the limit of authority dufferin any overly and it might have had from the perceived invitation from the victim to come back  taking her phone in her body and she said something to the fact she knew he would bring them back the phone and then he came back a second time  where she was asleep when she woke up and he was standing over her and she said he'd write exactly that ok now in the first instance was there any testimony about whether or not when he  property and love and then when exactly and then it hit so she was asked did you consider calling police and she testified well i thought about it but i couldn't because i didn't have my phone and then that i let you know i'm troubled by the fact that the authority in this case was given by defendants alleged domestic abuse whose residence was the subject of a no contact order entered because of defen you and my question really is to what extent can we trust that any invitation extended by a victim or her abuser when they had abuse or shows up on her doorstep in flagrant violation of a court order is in fact voluntary it's voluntary consent i'm just not sure that the power do i think the power dynamics really are so uncertain in such cases that like to know how we can trust lividity of any authority so called authority of it was and should this or be wary of setting a precedent stating that permission under such circumstances insulate  with the dynamic that i'm talking about i mean even if we're to believe that she can stand trumps the order order can we take a look at the dynamic of the situation and say that's no concern at all hold this well down to whether the the property owner rental person whoever it is whether their consent can trump the court's direction it comes down to whether the resident consent given then there's a court order right so there is no authority if there was no consent your position would be that there was concern it and if there was you would never get to the order because there was no have to come and she had contact with them later to contact them later when he she woke up and he was standing over began you know i was talking about when he was in jail she talked to him on the phone he sent money she said she still loved consent doesn't override the order there's there's no factors no undermining the court already that was for getting back to justice thomas issues if that's the case if if a couple married couple both on the property had a court order the woman got a court order to keep him off the property you're saying that he still can go  or every every battery case then we will end up with it's a domestic violence case that couples are living together and there's property rights involved and every case they can go on anyway so what's the point of the court order if if he