pictures of mr porn only one occasion when he went to a bar for his ten year anniversary ten year graduation reception one time and they took photographs of him outside she refused to give him a the schedules of the child she told the doctor that he smoked in front of the child discussing it with him she refused to change the child's name until the last minute she sat him up with pictures at trial she submitted photographs of purity clothes she had told mr boring or had used my clothes give them to me dirty because i'm not working you out watch them and she took pictures of them the child seemed to be progressing or not as developed as someone my child should be at her age so mr boim didn't take or had the spice people come to his house when he had visitation the spice people afterwards she refused to allow him the recommendation of that program was further follow up for this child and she refused that and your honors i would submit is that in a child's best interest for a mother to refuse further evaluation of a child who experts independent experts have found she was developmentally progressing just as quickly as a child of her age there were oh miles was the answer there are miles testified to that i work in fake air she was a director montessori she had done evaluations of children and there was no evidence of that chris moves in and keeps her first seventeen days without talking to chris at all and then moves in with her parents the only any other case i can see that courts should look to who has been the primary custody but this child was only twenty one months old the primary custody it was not determined by remit or by court order and the only reason it remained was because of as arnold was not still its heyday every relationship between mr form where you're looking to which parent is going to raise this child for the next six and a half years to be an honest person to be living with her parents she's attending school we don't know for what we don't know for how long other than she indicated several years she's attending school that stability is that she had been fired from it no fewer than three jobs after her maternity leave she was fired from her job she took another job and she quit that job now at a time of hearing she was staying  didn't do so well your honor no we didn't because he was the one that was supporting the family at that time he was paying all the bills working six seven days a week nine ten hours a day so no he had but he has had taken it they are after again he was burdened with all of degree he's never declared bankruptcy but when you look through stability i believe in a way the evidence demonstrates that mr horn was certainly the more the more stable when you look to which party was looking out for the best interest of the time i mean again when you have the expert that says this trial this is a crime need to do something you don't do anything i think that should cause horn wanted to do that just so it was closer to this problem but if mr gore had explained that this testimony right now the physician is of a pediatrician is forty five minutes away from this out of home in the other direction from bloomington she lives in many of the doctors in peoria so what the child is in this is care he's got almost an hour to get your e and he was just simply asking so did the pediatrician is proceeding started with  and now they move back into her mother's home she has her mother there who works at state farm but work schedule is juggle so with the school since she was born hello two thousand and nine this coming sunday addison will be three years and one month old work arnold has been added since primary caretaker since day one there was that three month period of time when working at a soon to reside chris form when he admitted that she was the primary caretaker during that time this isn't a case where the courts looking at the facts in and serving him at the minor child was living with one parent while they were decision made was well while the trial court you giving the child to the parent who has said on the record that he would rather have a not a babysitter daycare provider take care of addison rather than have  about the allegations of the court ignoring brooke arnold's violent tendencies this wasn't a case about brooke arnold's violent tendencies and i and the question would be if the trial were fail to take she drove it into the truck that the father was driving ok there struck one and it was an abuse of discretion to place custody but what else did she do well she she was holding one of the children she picked up and was just the opposite of that right testified that chris just wasn't listening to what she was saying with regard to addison she was trying to communicate how this dialogue back and forth and it just wasn't see off all of this evidence with with testimony from each side and what it what it was down to on each of those elements is there's just not that large element that you look at to say you know this was just an abuse of discretion model there's been discussion about a prior employment way back to before as well six so to be so that shall not borne not having training on this heart lung monitor and i'm not meaning to misrepresent the record i don't believe there was testimony about that there may be an exhibit that demonstrates that she was on that forty five years of experience not only in daycare experience but evaluating children who have speech issues and she provided testimony that from her experience and observations with addison she did have find that in her testimony she observed mr born with anderson and they always had a loving caring responsible interaction with the child there were numerous witnesses that testified that mr moore took care of the child on his own whenever he had an opportunity to have visitation with the child his parents mother testified other neighbor testified other witnesses testified that he took care of the child when edison is in his care with regard to yes mr horn did file a petition for custody the day after the incident took pros and cons a checklist based on them considering abortion she didn't produce that those things i parenting from her behaviors and the evidence that was presented with the court clearly she was not cooperative and the evidence presented in the court suggested that