MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
accused of certain serious crimes is to be presumed unfit for treatment under the juvenile court system at the time of the charge crimes a minor between the ages of fourteen and sixteen is presumed unfit for juvenile court court three while not the actual killer he acted with reckless indifference to human life and was a major participant in the murder in these cases before the presumption to allow one of the most serious consequences and if not the most serious consequences which is not a law that is being tried as an adult to pass without judicial determination on the issue that i mat i do believe however that there with the shelling of subjective reckless indifference to human life was not sufficiently made and i would point to california robberies together in the past and were and the defendant was aware of the co defendants predilection for violence and i think there are things that the a legal or factual determination by the state court in rejecting the stricklin argument and as i understood petitioner counsel to just argue that the confessions in this case do not establish that the defendant or the petitioner had a subjective awareness that death could occur in this robbery and i would vehemently disagree with that i think it's important to recognize that petitioner told the police that he assumed the victim had a knife because quote all mexicans carry knives and he also stated that had two kids tried to rob him he would have responded with deadly force so given that given his confession that he was the lookout given his confession that at one point he used his finger and told the victim great yourself which is in the vernacular you know you're getting robbed i don't think there can be any argument that the state court was objective leant reasonable here in finding that had petitioned her counsel made a motion the government can't establish a crime a face a case that the government would not have been able to establish that i'm thinking crime official case i think as long as the confessions are in evidence there can be no doubt that there was no strickland violation here unless the court has any other questions with respect to the miranda issue or the auditor in this issue which counsel the not addressed i have nothing more to respond to the strictly  convention that the prosecution could have easily met its plan to fish a case which is strictly probable cause substantial belief that a reasonable person would find him guilty under the second degree murder there's no further questions will submit thank you
honestly the district court's decision is wrong yes because the county has not and will not be able to argue permit right the county denied the permits your honor and their argument as well and it's a matter of law they couldn't do it and they just perverted the procedures so badly that they're here they've been fighting the issue they're fighting about whether they committed procedural violations or b they have power at all to do it if they win there if they if they lose and procedural goes back to them i assume so and you'll be doing all the consulting in the world if they want on their position then y has every reason not to agreed to that i assume so i understand that talking about your additional conditions how are they part or will they be part of this litigation the district courts can impose
dream of being an actor but when you're better than dreaming whatever your future may be
range he says that affords him no further rulings that your honor respectfully again is a mis understanding of the court's discretion the court's discretion but the guideline range is important committee and i don't think he should be given any further really given that he's already sentencing he's already serving a sentence below probation position because of the government to wall argument to the court in terms of eligibility there was nothing that would suggest from this single line at the end that this was a discretionary because that's what the government hopes to do it cited here it seems you're arguing at the heart you're arguing that this order and the case that the district court likely believed that it was bound by the guidelines guideline factors or the offense facts such as drug amounts the only thing that is recalculated at this point is you plug in that section to the extent that changes anything the statutory range or the guideline calculation  and the guideline advisory guidelines suggest a range higher than what is actually serving now because of the commutation and that is why the government's position is that the court should not go below that god line but our reading of how looking at advisory guidelines nothing else has changed the only things change for those that are modified by section two that's what the court did here did it profit that calculation all those steps were done properly and having guess you're saying it could go down two years but but that doesn't mean that the eight year term is in violation of the new that lease you're just saying i said grafton he had discretion to drop it two if you look at everything here that the court set and you compare it to what what the court said is that if it was truly making a discretionary denial there is really no basis to find that criminal history or whatever when the court referendum and let me ask you a very practical question if if you're saying that reading that i think context we should not read it the way mr cohen treating it alternative just discretionary ruling nor did the court say for the reasons the government i should exercise my discretion there is just no indication that the court but we and understood that it could they will affect all for this day and they will affect how rulings on these cases will affect a lot of other cases so we really appreciate the good work that you've done and helping us  make the best decision that we can we are in recess until tomorrow morning
simply straight up bring a cat appeal it has to be part of an appeal from a denial of cancellation of removal the case is st fort versus ashcroft of the first circuit and there's a hundred nine of cocaine trafficking that's correct he was a sense that eight years he served about six and if we were to agree with your position and a year from now he engaged in cocaine trafficking again with the united states remov he could continue to engage in cocaine trafficking and be convicted and served his time and under your theory of the law never be returned to cuba because of  country to find another state haven or another country where he would be permitted i suppose the u s government could do that but as far as cuba goes no i don't believe he could be returned to cuba at all but the furthermore such a slight i mean it's it's not petitioner a statutorily an eligible for asylum and statutorily ineligible for withholding of removal because of the drug trafficking conviction that it was both an aggravated felony and a particularly serious crime but then with it's a very high standard yes to me yes to show a clear probability which is means more likely than not that he would be tortured and not just persecuted in cuba that he that board an immigration judge focused on the fact that he had showed only very minimal political involvement since he left cuba and certainly in the last so you know since his conviction he done very little so there and there was no evidence i q a was torturing people in his sort of don't know other other any other country maybe north korea which would have as much information regarding how much shorter there is for anybody and i stood who's ever been present and clearly our belief is that even immigration judge did fight so i mean based on his testimony and based on the overwhelming evidence we think that's i mean it was clearly that he would be tortured for eternity thank you thank you both for your argument
you may perceive organization which is what we do here for the new laws to look at whether the property itself is primarily used for chapel purposes and that's when the court got into looking as to who was actually using the hall of the bar holton things like that so because we don't have properties here
to the next case this morning a statement like that the court has to look to make sure that it's certain the district court would come to the same ruling which requires some level of detail more than sort of a cursory statement the extent to what we have from the dish of course sort of a general discussion of his  mistrial should've been granted a low standard reasonable possibility i would suggest there's at least seven sources for why that possibility is in fact reasonable first being as i mentioned district already concluded that that type of information could c about an officer witness being a very honorable man an upright officer some do not purposely try to deceive anyone potential juror claiming the defendant previously held a gun to his head the defendant tried to pass a fraudulent prescription at the prospective jurors workplace and these are the reason this court so deferential and district courts to district on these matters is because they're the ones on the ground they can hear the scheme and they can see its effect upon the potential jurors they're able to gauge whether this type of statement is going to have any impact whatsoever before this fraud came to light and it wasn't even the victim way down if i did it was her accountant i don't know how long this would have gone had a third party not come in and identified it to the victim because the victim just didn't have the capacity on supervised release in the previous case you know i can't give you a month frame i apologize your honor but i can tell you she was still paying restitution by the time she committed this offense was there a motion to exclude that previous conviction how was  the regular guideline range so why is this even an issue i agree with your honor it's not an issue in the district court made clear time and again that this wasn't an issue he went out of this way to say to your honor's point exactly this is within either guideline frame it's what i would have given regard last even if the court did clearly err in finding that she was financially illiterate which it didn't answer you know it's allowed to consider these things as thirty five fifty three a factor the court statement is pretty unequivocal that it was going to get the same sense regardless parsing case which i know just came to you authored i would point out a few differences in that case first of all the reference wasn't to the defendant having pointed a gun to the head it was a reference to a separate we tried codefendant the district court also indicated in that case that the profession before computers were prolific one other few other indicators things that i like to respond to first the victim dr kahn did identify that she was not receiving the normal amount of money she was used to receiving within months it did not solely take a separate individual accounting to find it she did then hire someone to help her assess what was happening but she did notice that on her own and in terms of just me questions about fifteen months being within either gu
he didn't review records and if you look at the amended petition that was filed by both conviction counsel you will see many of the claims overlapping now just because it is not a carbon copy of it that doesn't mean he's somehow be negligent in fact the way that defendant argues he maintained frivolous claims from the pros a petition that certainly implies that he was at least reading the procedure to sion so the record this show that postcondition
whatever it was you know a picture and this individual had a ratio so you're saying that you can only speak if you are exactly matching up with the description
more often than not it is the woman who holds the family purse train to stretch the family paycheck is the struggle eternal always the difficult go making our money reach out to cover more of our needed or wanted and luxuries meeting the unexpected happenings that any family has always to expect and for further use of what we already have for making do so nothing will be wasted or doing without the paycheck and molded in the ways of the rest making a fine art of doing so with the family helps provide us with the daily necessities and perhaps some of our delightful american privileges  is based on savings by reducing the family needs as well as by spending for she spend to save and saves to spend if the purchases have been good ones they can serve new owners as time goes on and we'll laugh and laugh and laugh and la those who sell and all who manufacture what is so know that american women often have the deciding voice in what ever we come to buy they offer he romance the adventure of killing from who gathered from the four corners of america and indeed from all the world all well lighted for selection the place where she can reach them arranged for time saving as well as money saving selections even though she may shop only once a week behind the scenes and by our supplier and suppliers of supplies men and women who know how much the many pennies they save in handling what she buys or she buys may mean to her in individual purchase always the cheapest than those whose idea of saving is to spend gasoline driving around the block looking for a parking meter with bre time left on those qualities that provide for better appearance for promise to give us lasting satisfaction we see to it that whatever we buy it's functional and her fortune the courtship means keen competition each producer trying to time with choice offerings calculated to please her and please her family a little better than with the attractions of anyone else competition presses the retail dealer to into practicing thrifty way get lead him into dealing intended for penny make all the difference in what is american industry to save production costs carries on the continual search for ways of keeping costs down the whole prices down so our products can be priced to stand out in our competitive american market
welcome to the world of tomorrow climb aboard you are about to take a journey out of this world into the world of the future forget the world around you forget the people around you are entering futurama alone with your own thought if you ever wondered where we will find clothing and shelter  or other not still resources here to meet the needs of the world tomorrow what about that great unexplored consonance of the bottom of our earth larger than the united states and europe combined with enough food to feed the earth's population seven times over there are rich or the mineral carried by submarine trains to process stations on the coast there is the water itself to be drained from the sea and made precious rain to turn desert land into fertile land there will even be new areas for living and working a whole new dimension of life where people of the great promise once barriers to man progress the mountains will soon be traversed by multiple highways that will soar over canyons and cut through towering walls that will carry live stream of minerals and other natural resources to the thriving industries of tomorrow i ways to will open up the great expanses of desert land one day to be made fertile again by water is pumped from  of the modern home exhibit you visited earlier today the wonderful new concept you saw in the kitchen where i couldn't believe isn't that certainly understandable it's hard to believe there actually is an oven that can cook a roast in minutes by electronics then bake you potatoes in less time than it takes to carve the ro and remember that new idea for the family that enjoys casual live in a refrigerated cart ready for wheeling into a game room or out on the patio perfect for keeping food and drinks cool or informal like being on the mediterranean good hea in so much frozen food look of how much this dishwasher ho happened again and now i'm in the
more tons of freight more miles than all other forms of transportation put together how much taxes do the railroad pay in a year one billion two hundred fifty million dollars how much does it cost to all a ton of freedom i don't buy railroads average is less than the my head can stop me then maybe ten times in the studio audience and he says anybody in the audience got a question though asked what happened to th paying for and maintained by the railroads don't forget sense and with every mile a line you got a cash investment about hundred ten thousand dollars don't forget that maybe that's the story this t v program o saying right at this moment when you are thinking about it the railroads are moving the endless variety of raw materials which big industries of the nation will refine convert fabricate process and manufacture
discussed is the say they write an opinion and they say ok we're not going to reopen because they're only a change of personal circumstances fear of this organization because of personal circumstance but there is no change in the country and make nor the evidence from that was submitted for whatever awaited should have from this doctor wrote jack says things that changed and there's a strike our policy in prison and you know work in prison policy things have changed he basically says and things are worse and as a result there's more likelihood that it should be put in prison when she goes back and there's more likelihood she'd be there i so that's what he says in the v a writes their short opinion is if he had said anything at all about china so if we conclude that maybe the government has an answer to that but if we conclude that what i just basically what happened then don't we just have to send it back to the v a and say you did not address the evidence of change country conditions it's your responsibility to address whether they dress the seven to make a decision in the first instance if it's material and if it's a material change and then we review that and this and we jump ahead of that and last year a decision following up on that considered that we considered this so technically we've now i'm going to time you we did everything we were supposed to do so we get it back in the same manner and we just have a list of items that they documents kind of went by the wayside i'm afraid then she read filed a motion to reopen with pain the fee and that document came later so when you look at the record things are out of order and what they usually are so  i think we've we've heard enough unless you have something there ok we appreciate it dan appearing before us today and we thank counsel on both
judicial rule judicial center you know what we're dealing with here entered below is a memorandum and these are quote generally brief and i would only slight one additional case this came down after our main grief was filed down with my guts out of the district court for the eastern district of new york that was decided on february sixth twenty two one nice to five giving them sixty days we should've picked up the telephone and said fellas we've got troubles instead they waited for the sixty days to expire and then they then they allowed us to declare the file and then and then they said us we've got problems here and i said well let's see your books and records why they didn't provide their books and records within that sixty day period and maybe we would have said hey we're not going anywhere do this and now they're back here saying you can't do that under arrest we don't have any authority to cite but you can actually picked you didn't you didn't sell your soul you gave it away tell us why you don't have a forty one the tax code is full of they said they gave they gave the trustees lexapro with the here and then the and then they say there's no flexibility once you make that decision or like commercial lenders and everybody else in the to zero but it's not ticking but then they kept on defaulting so you had multiple clocks ticking this one stick in for a lot that quarterly payment and then we got another clock ticking and then we got another clock ticking on another clock tick and we have multiple clocks ticking but not the big one for the six year limitation based on rebel cation because i base it on acceleration because that clock got reset to zero by the agreement of the parties they can accelerate if they think it's a good decision they can even do a partial acceleration i've never seen one of those but if you do a partial acceleration that's a lot of flexibility if they're not for the questions  ability to be flexible however in this case the trustee made the decision to accelerate they made the decision to make the election after thirteen ninety nine at that point they are under notice that the claim for the entire amount of withdrawal i believe has accrued and it's up this is the first complaint when they realized that if they played at the same way they applied in the past and it's basically barred by the statute of limitations that's why they changed it the trustee changed its view and in twenty eighteen for the first time only sought the missing instalment noticed pleading you're allowed to supplement your facts long as they're consistent with the complaint in response to a motion to dismiss and that's what happened here and if you look at those materials which the plaintiff was allowed to submit in response to a motion  and i think we're entitled to approve their act but to your honest question as to the amount about standard that i believe that attached to our response to the motion to dismiss filed in the district court t
i remember that beginning typing class and if it were yesterday i was lucky enough to have it for sale as my teacher he taught us much more than typing he was teaching me to get along in the business world in typing with only a part of  please before we go on to the next exercise i'd like to make one of my little speeches this is your first course in preparing for an office job you're starting a new career it can be fun our it can be hard it all depends on the way you look at things your attitude for instance you'll be working in an office well don't forget the golden rule works there just as it does anywhere else treat others as you want to be treated here's how it applies to an offer first of course know your job enjoy it but also enjoy the people that you're working with be considerate of them and be considerate of your employer remember those simple rules of office etiquette and you'll get along in the business world now then let's do skill building practice a margin begin typing when ready it was until i got my first job and i really began to understand some of the i plan to get there early that first day i wore my good suit because it was plain and neat and seemed right for an office it looked like it would be hard to fall apart but the part about enjoying the people you're working with my mistakes gracefully instead of arguing about them or offering i learned when i wasn't sure instead of making a wild guess and i learned not to read criticism or to brood over it time became even more important when i became mr secretary his work included public relations as well as personnel so i had plenty to do i had more contact with people outside the company and i learned the importance of