depending claims seven in nineteen these claims deal with controlling that the speed of performance of the microprocessor and they do so with some specific claim a mutation and those are namely the retrieval of the clock control that are dependent upon the operational mode then once you have that you compare that with a temperature measure what the board part where is the error and what avoid the error is that the board's consideration in their decision they have but a single sentence and that single sentence makes reference to one so basically they used a key to it as disclosing the use of temperature to determine the clocks so there is really no consideration of what i was cited a minute ago about retrieval of a clock control data based upon a model well to the extent they made any analysis they reach some sort of conclusion that there was  didn't go to the next level which they claimed requires that you have to retrieve clock control that it depended upon the motor and then you could make the comparison using that retreat with t the reference itself akita what it teaches is that they compare a temperature measurements with a pre determined set threshold and that's illustrated in the reference and because it has a set temperature it it's it can be depended upon luck it's fixed and the point of these so from then analysis it's our opinion that there is no the reason the basis or explanation by the agency it's an adequate and requires reversal attaining this temperature measurement from the temperature sensor that is internal to a microprocessor and then we also resize that that same temperature measurement is made available extra noise to the microprocessor so that we can make these comparisons like the one we just forget about including for the comparison has to do with fan control inside the chip get the actual temperature measurement and then we make that available outside that show none of the references to the primary reference the office if you cio director relies on his pippin and in that reference it does have an internal temperature sensor that's an internal temperature sensor but peepin process is that temperature measured inside so that it can generate what's called the interrupt signal and then it uses this interrupt signal inside to interrupt processing operations so you'll you'll note that the interrupt signal is sent to what they refer to a pro unit seven zero five in a micro program seven thirty so conventionally at an interrupt is to alter the processing going on so that's what it's doing  the officer is trying to distort pippin so that if you believe them that this interrupt signal is lost so if you put your measurement and the board agreed with the examiner statement that it's not quite clear if they actually called it a temperature measurement but they said they considered it as a temperature measurement because it suggested that the signal was indicative of a temperature the interrupt signal is just a digital zero or one there's there's no measurement ability with that so as i mentioned previously it still indicates whether the temperature has a certain threshold it indicates that it's some point in time the temperature sensor had a temperature that was in an elevated i think they use one hundred degrees or something in their example right at some point it trip and the signal went but that's it the signal that it went is what we're talking that's the only thing that's really all of outside so it's outside you know they've got a signal but you don't know  what these temperatures go up two hundred hundred fifty in less than a second if you go from one who knows that you don't really know what the temperature is outside and beyond that outside you just have to little signal it triggered how are you going to compare that to a clock control data or fan control data you can't the only reason there is looking to find another temperature measurement is because the reference doesn't really teach it and the interrupt signal is champ used to make the comparison and for example the temperature measurement we're using extraordinarily and with respect to claim for is to compare with mode dependent and control data they also don't have this  and it's not clear how they're combining these two references or what the motivation is to do so but in any case a reference is not an internal temperature sensor i the court i only have two points to make and the program the fact that pins temperature sensor is programmable that in itself defines the fact that it is measuring  temperature at a specific threshold and so there is no doubt that the sensor of of pippin is making a temperature measurement within the processor and that temperature measured the fact that temperature thomas hasn't provided any reason to doubt why temperature measurement should be understood in any other way the only other argument that mr thomas raise that i would like to address is that there are strict claims seventy nine teens specifically t control hakan troll data and that argument from the bourse perspective is the same argument with regards to that fan control data which is simply met by these various pre determined preprogrammed temperature thresholds that are part of the sensor and once one of the that temperature threshold is reached that is your fan control data that is your clock control  data which is then used depending on the mood of the system to decide how to control the fan or how to control the clock speed it's a simple as that there's nothing here that distinguishes mr thomas from science from  i didn't reference with respect to claim was not the linchpin argument in our brief is casually mentioned but it is actually more  presented in the director's brief i want to touch on the motivation to combine the board and examine  the a key to reference would motivate breaking down a partner and pulling one part and putting on the outside so that they have the needed temperature measurement outside  so they speculated that oh ok i pull off that compared are circuit which just is implemented by a handful of transistors i pull that out and put it outside  and that will save money so in the event that i have to replace the microprocessor  know it's hard to conceive how that one skilled in your would be motivated to break apart something you say five transistors to somehow save on a replacement cost about trying to get the better product they're not trying to figure out how much it costs that something happens after an innovation and trying to make it