legislative authority have an important role to play in this process so not only are the courts to be competent to reach these issues there's a special place set aside for the local courts and there we do have a supreme court and no more ninth circuit review of local court decision  this is really a question of local application and want to know where else is the place where it's interesting that's where people are concerned about this in a governmental dispute i doubt that many people are concerned about it outside of the confines of  would be an adequate opportunity to litigate the federal issues in the local courts and that's not just supposition at this point because we have seen the superior court and now the supreme court has passed on these very exact identical issues  view of the declaratory judgment act it was apparently just go through the cracks perhaps they thought that they'd covered it on the analysis for abstention under younger workers doctrines but they are totally different doctors and they're totally different because the standard of review is totally different the abuse of discretion standard is what applies when a declaratory judgment act issue comes up for the court it's a higher standard with respect to the extension darkrooms that's one reason also  abstaining from resolving this essentially local dispute you know federal declaratory judgment action the only way the only argument that we could conceive would be otherwise is that well this wasn't an injunction this was declaratory relief well that's not true this was an injunction action as well as one forty two it really it wasn't an action to enjoin the court proceedings it was however according to the latest a jurisprudence under your younger that's not necessary you don't have to have an action which directly enjoins the local court proceeding it's enough that it's a declaratory judgment action that has the same effect of enjoying them and what would have happened in this case is the federal court if it had proceeded in this case and i on the attorney general's favor would have issued an injunction in joining the very relief that was given by the superior court and subsequently affirmed by the supreme court clearly interfering with what's going on and so from a younger concerning the collateral issue of sealing the documents the parties were talking back and forth about well can the attorney general represent everybody but nobody can see where all these half of the same time have professional responsibility going on here so the courts look there's a lot of issues raised in this case that have to do with professional responsibility in conduct which is uniquely local matter for the wants cream horn the local courts that's one dimension of it the other is what we've seen and some of the more recent cases interpretive bird when they talk about where you have a scanning of intertwined statutes local and federal and i think that's what the court was getting at here is we have a situation where we have very clear local statutes that say the earth port authority shall have the right to have its own private council it says it in several places then we have a vague statute passed by congress which indicates that the attorney general  statutes that seem to be saying the same covering the same topic and the question is which one's rights they're intertwined you can't look at one apart from the other and that's what the court was looking at when it said zapatero there's a lot going on here and it's the local courts that are in the best position to deal with this and now we see the local courts have dealt with it is that the ceiling of this letter was only temporary for seventeen days and it was only provisional the attorney general was given the opportunity to submit a redacted version of the letter which the attorney general did if i be sustained by the court and for very compelling reasons in the case of the younger doctor and and in particular the declaratory judgment act this is a very clear case of the declaratory judgment act where the court and exercise of its sound discretion as the trial court said this is not the kind of case that should be heard and got a record and that's the language of the course used in his decision this is an intergovernmental power struggle dispute that involves uniquely local issues yes there is a federal statute involved but these are local issues local concerns and we've got a local supreme court now that can make these decisions here in light of our local statutes which the local courts have a particular familiarity with they deal with them all the time and they can be answering for the consequences when perhaps other cases come up with raising similar issues so for a host of reasons the district court did the right thing for the right reasons three of those reasons for any one of