counsel raised the same argument that case they utilize the class action concept to pursue its case which attack  the question then simply becomes is that program legal or illegal under the tort nearly yeah and that analysis does not bring a little powers into play which would justify taking a collect taxes and perform its essential functions one of those functions which is the important issue of educating the children in our public schools so there's a lot at stake here the question  case law that talks about representative loss and how we would act ministry that in the courts and there is there we would be for with having to fight tooth  over issues like are the taxpayers who come before the court are they adequate representatives of everybody within the quincy school districts taxing district are these  appropriate to me to have a court adjudicate across the board as it applies to everybody within the taxing district and i would submit to the court i don't think it's too farfetched to say that this has extremely broad possibly chaotic and disruptive implications for the ability of the quincy school district to perform its essential function because what happens is as the tax objectors have done here in town truth they are seeking not only to represent everybody within the district but also to enjoin the county treasurer from collecting refund taxes that are long gone and it just doesn't make sense on these facts in the course of actually this is nothing new i mean as we we pointed out in our reefs and i county to bring a representative suit in equity to obtain a refund and to enjoying the collection of taxes and what the court arise out of such a scenario and they say to permit tax objections under the circumstances to be tried by injunction would hopelessly disrupt the orderly administration of the tax collecting machinery thereby embarrassing and arranging the operations of the government and causing serious detriment to the of we would submit to the court that that is exactly what would happen it or if the and it may just be that the tightening of the issue in the two cases that have come down over the course of some but clearly these were not the arguments that were stated i believe raef but we think that the issue really still is whether there is an adequate remedy of law in the case can be cited solely on that basis without leaching all of these others all of these other side issues which we try to chase down in what we would ask the court to do is to follow the president stablished by the third district in finding that i present tax code does present an adequate remedy of law for these taxpayers we don't need to resolve these issues of property tax code that's what it's there for and there is no consequently it's not that the state legislature in the property tax court has sided to regulate rather it is the complete removal of a remedy wall the court gets equitable jurisdiction and that's why we ordered those cases and that's actually what the millennium joint venture it's once again literally with regard to an authorized the actually what you end up doing is a factual inquired with regard to those expenditures and how they work underneath the player and then to the extent they have things that fall within the plan if the plan falls within the