that's the rule baseball unlike baseball we have the right of appeal on to appeal the decision by the court and the in this case that the template is put over in this case we believe shows that the court call a ball strike and that it was the stake in it was in the state based upon two things or evaluation the patient and they rely on the scene of the call every time so that they get an accurate assessment so that other people other doctors working here can see whether the diagnosis is a problem based upon standard sim is he did assess it with what's called scoring on him and he i did gather some information but from that point you as a template you couldn't put anything over to say this is why you decided sure if that time she wanted to continue to get through i just don't know but when she did pursued it she did find that he would put through information this the sunni can process whatever it was that was unsubstantiated uncorroborated by the husband but when it came time to think that she had told him that well corroborated he didn't deem him to be reasonable was significant is it was incidence of physical abuse or domestic violence mrs wells has a wide range of possible conduct or statute that ranges from harassment by definition all with physical violence she told him there was physical ones she showed him pictures she told him about he wasn't getting up like he was asleep and rubbing his eyes he just got caught right up and started talking when they saw the wife she was clearly upset her face was red shift in crime the husband had been obviously freaking  concluded or of said in some point that it wasn't relevant bills of testified however that domestic violence it he said he would never recommend custody for someone who was  their persons part that correct that's correct that is and that's why when we see we say the ball misses the stripes and he was he relied upon the testimony of the doctor closer in in and it's if your client testified to these things and prajna yes they could yes and he but he still made this binding after hearing her testimony and hearing the testimony of the other witnesses he he yes he did he made that it fine because it's like if there's no problem to follow the rules to follow it's just a gut reaction from someone who doesn't follow professional procedure it's like taking a if part of his team you can't tell what the rest of it is like if he hasn't been it been nine or ten months since he'd even seen anyone talk to anyone investigating anything or scream or rules require us to get these things done eighteen months well this is ten months and in the youngest child's last one fifth of her life prove domestic violence than did on the husband when he said he she smoke pot he could explain why probably she was needed for her not for him in this example after example quite frankly i think she did  litigant she didn't go as far as she could if she addressed all these but she did a fairly decent job of bringing on some of the information the second part the second strike in obviously we're sitting at the judge  is really considered to be something that is very strongly taking that time and there was testimony also that the mother had been the primary caretaker during the years that the husband had found within one's divorce a final four schools through him and he stepped up his game but historically the mother the primary peer when the mother went back to the place where they all were all the families of the time nobody's up here except the day when she went back and this is or was  nothing scientific about there's nothing professional about it he just felt that way so that now if that's the case and children travel from madison county to peoria or you know on the testimony of this expert without a problem so the two things that we think were straight out of this all know the crowd saw that if you put something on it were the fact that he relied upon him in determining what's proper custodial parent the second that he gave is a schedule every other week and if the mother properly done custody was going to be in kentucky the father should have every other week in three hours is it too far to travel  for children to be with a parent in fact sometimes the trip is worth it because you get trapped car time with the kids where you can actually enjoy council doesn't address the reason why i came up with this so well you know but it was not and i think given his testimony he had been involved in two hundred fifty or three hundred fifty cases goes toward the fact that he mention that both parties that have done quite a bit of what what he called sniping made when you when you have a lot of the other but a common in divorce cases these judges have to sit and sit through that and they're there all right go with not who is necessarily the worst person but in this custody would be in the best interests of the children to resign another hearing which some point each party had he had plenty of things to base and the fact that he ruled this he did was not clearly i'm just not subject to being over having not been crowding out so i don't know exactly what the destiny was on that but that was part of the race and they did not want then i w