MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
tax second tough on the defendant during the police off was told that at the end of his service short term in the department of corrections he could be committed is this is sexually violent person which would mean he claim when he says he would not acquit guilty if he knew that when he finished his farm and then initially he said i was not aware of that in a court says let's go through that and then with the court then it monstrous him recollection i think it understands what's going on he doesn't remember the part of the conversation and then it kind of reaffirms that he wants to plead despite the fact that he could be committed for the rest of his life for thirty one persons act requires release and acquirements for sex offender registration a lot of those things are done through regulatory means more than by stitched requirement in the regulatory means ministered through the department of corrections and through the prisoner release board both of those things have vailable administrative remedies and my understanding is that the wa the three years too late provision for mandatory supervised release is it mystery is that various things come into play as to whether there will actually be a legitimate out date three years or at some point past three years and that natural life and that these things are handled through administrative remedies i'm not entirely sure good enough literature defendant got an extremely lenient deal probably to protect his daughter from having to testify but in addition to the significantly lower sentence for the nature of th health have the defendant called to trial had been convicted he would have been in the same situation as two m s r but likely after a significantly longer sentence and even with the same sentence it would likely not have been concurren to the unrelated criminal conduct so i think that houston p d s teach that things and direct have to quell this is are now in the mix for council but he's teaches that what council has to prevent has to have a degree of certainty so that council can legitimately advice is quiet and was the best course of action in this situation it would be hard to have a better outcome than what the defendant received and although the defendant is proceeding through the post conviction hearing and he is more likely remedies this fire is  record this bear allegation could ever be enough there has to be even a stage one of a kind of medical claim
or so the state was happy with the bottom line the state was happy with the bottom line but now isn't happy with the particular issues that are with the issue this before  that the defense lawyer in his conversations with the prosecutor's office before trial or after trial if there's nothing in those conversations that show any glimmer that the prosecution is going to do anything but insist on  term then i don't think there's any need to discuss you know mere speculation on who are or wishful thinking on the part of the defense and there's nothing in the there's nothing on the record that shows the conversations like that that didn't occur and if conversations like the posture of a defendant that they know is going to trial and claim innocence and you know if it's the fact that they opposed to there it doesn't mean they would have been fine well but i think even if you look what the prosecutor
you know justice office position was well taken it was not raised rates for the first time of appeal so it does put you in a difficult defensive position but you do understand that notwithstanding whether we like it or net jurisdiction can be raised at any time so i think it's a pretty significant impediment to the stand in the record because of that record has to show that it was issued within twenty days of receiving your notice and you're candidly telling us we appreciate it there's nothing in the record that defines the date correct at the for the first time or you can't do that so if we send a package we have with three hundred cases involving the attorney general's office we come up here and we waste  such and such a case can be within thirty days the arbitrator's decision not twenty days of the commission's decision and that's going to be the end of it because in none of these pieces to do him any evidence that he did not perceive that within the statutory period of time
occurred five years after her husband's death although in the so that she knew her husband was dead and then the appointment of the executor or a view of the fact she did not modify the conditions set forth of the establishment of the truck under article in fact is republics by the fall of now you know why he chose to do that i don't know but then when the fact of the matter is that the documents that she signed to me it would have been more logical to have deleted articles  support the conclusion that she intended to provide him her will for the dissolution of the property or for husband through the system the court appoints to article two which provides for the disposition of the household and personal effects providing that
in a pinch of salt just going to make set up very simple you have a delicious there is no skin on that that is just the latest salmon f nice things slices out of it this point if you wanted to keep your carrots not spicy and just an ice pick ok you let this finish on for another eight minutes or so let it cool in the fridge they're going to taste bad the next day but you can eat on that way vinegar yes messier pickling is going to be done with white vinegar is if you're looking for something a little bit sweeter then you're going to find it going to like an apple cider vinegar rice wine vinegar or something with a little bit more sweetness to it but otherwise he basically you can substitute it if you wanted these to be a little bit sweeter you can substitute it with a sweeter ben again which would be like your apple cider something like that yeah yeah fine can do anything with it you pay much take any vegetable here spare yes comer's peppers take anything and take on the summer i recommend it all kinds of recipes on line and company it's a it's set up it's probably not hot in there that's going to that's where you're going to get yourself from yeah yeah yeah that's easy way to do it yeah yeah know i don't seven days yeah and then yes you have a catch you get your products like this right here so it's all care you're taking rinse it off in the sink and in padded dry and then you get the access of the only thing we do with that is that we're basically just poaching our red onions and red wine vinegar and it gives them a very bright almost like sweet with like take that red wine sour kind of flavor and we serve that with different dishes to get on sandwiches and  yeah yeah yeah that's a good trivia question yeah that's that's a good ad term that i really it's a pie ganti it's a french word thing yeah there's fermentation going on with it and it's it's a it holds for a long time and i've never actually made sauerkraut myself so i don't want to give any bad tips on that by somebody out here
so some general development themes that came over the exercise yesterday on your some of the we create working people participated in the process us some statements that would help formulate a vision for the community we took those in and work them on how much commonality there was in those statements and the number of wanted almost more convenient services and i think a lot of from the groups that i work with convenience services generally we have neighborhood commercial conveniences so all that  little bit about the eleventh scenarios themselves we spent a good part of this warning studying all the maps and looking at areas of commonality in areas where there were differences and i think the new green areas here indicate here is where there's general consensus on what ought to happen to one degree or another whether it's  now if we're going to have smaller wound residential maybe some mixed use nodes or commercial little's it would make sense to make them an uncontrolled on the village development that township would be preserved as golf courses forever based on our experience and that's hard to do because a lot of golf courses are struggling financially and over  overlooking the water and so on and the same with the pop up downs and cross routes here you suppose i think we're great examples where people say we know there's something there now and in the future see about that on a number of its desired street improvements this is an example where we have to do a lot more study to look at how
instructions under a deeply you got a couple of very high hurdles to clear you have to demonstrate to us that the factual here isn't reasonable and we give special deference to a trial judge's view of jurors and indicate why was that on reasonable i mean i read that  so i understand what the court is think but i'm not going under the unreasonable determination clauses that i agree that's a pretty tough struggle what's of contrary to it is contrary to thought it was a misdemeanor the evidence was passed lanner the evidence really was whether we could see the straps in the window in the reflection and i wanted it but i'm reflection now that i'm treating this seriously as i had not is marshal standing along it doesn't get you there so then it's like what additional plus factors here takes it beyond simply that and first of all plus factor it does because there was a way out i mean the the correct thing to do is we have a hopelessly muddled situation here where the court screwed up the court injected the year you got out you got a conscientious jerk reacting is certainly submit that this case under the a t v a petition hasn't made the burden that this is unreasonable determination of facts certainly is a reasonable germination based on everything that the truck would set forth in the record here all had questions about that in the reflection that was the bottom line we watched the whole film up to the very end and we just couldn't tell then we got to the point where we we do see a reflection maybe that is of it was she's got either the case either goes or it doesn't go because now it's oh it's eleven to one you know so she's got to go back in there and she's saying i will follow the law that's the factual finding so how could he send her back  i sorry i was in a trial i can't tell you or i i mean somehow i guess the other way ok thank you very much younger says nothing is now submitted for decision that's the last face an argument calendar this today and for the week we are now on a journey thank you very much
which provides an extension of the period of limitations outside of the steps trade limitations as presented forth into fourteen point three of the illinois civil procedure code flo with regards to examining section two seventeen first of all we have to start by examining the purpose of the statute and examining that we have to look at the flames more clearly meaning of the statute if the statute was put forth the legislature put forth for reasons to ignore to seventeen in this manner is to put forth a statute that has no purpose before the much sleep chair therefore the legislature would have put forth a statute that was absurd and had case and looking at legislative intent and the purpose of legislative history we would just be moving forward they're nuts in that case the statute of two seventeen would be rendered useless the legislature statutes to be consistent in harmonious therefore two seventeen should be read in accordance with two fourteen point three as they're part of the same general structure of the illinois procedure code which differs from another case  versus taylor machine works matter and therefore should be given priority over to fourteen point three seats the legislature needs later looked at it and amended it and furthermore and the judicial system has further overturned that matter and again amended it since if the issues of that would be pertaining to discovery for instance if we have a never ending matter where someone's never notified the case and you know it goes on for years and years and years there's numerous discover issues that will rise people who just paperwork people change their minds things  kirkland and johnson in one thousand nine hundred eighty and the case has not been not prosecuted properly in this matter but however it has gone forward and unfortunately mr kirtland while he has joined the military and that has stated this matter repeatedly it's not a matter of my client not serving the parties as in other cases where there are certain sure of service under one of the three d it's not a matter of the not participating in this process it's more or less a matter of saying ok you should get your day in court  the parties would be a little too dusts even aware of it matter originally and then after that they're given a period of one year of this case was not refiled on the last day of that one year period but merely a within a matter of months following specifically put in that section however two seventeen still applies to two fourteen point three the legislature should not have to one minute into each and every statute to make it to seventeen apply therefore the mere language of two seventeen specifically history to someone she was put forth for a reason we have to give it some sort of purpose if it applies to the medical malpractise route just to apply here with regards to the medical malpractise actually specifically if you look at the lehman case
specify a claim fail to explain exactly how or why she was prejudiced failure to attach supporting documentation and the court also noted how the post a petition was not very well developed in terms of explanation claims and this is what he didn't do time and time again by just standing on this petition turner is directly on point and under turner this court cannot speculate as to what the trial court would have done had counsel
before you get to the nd issue with the st issue is about senior state department country conditions record metzner ok what what is the requirement that the be alway report that that come from right the level of common tippity has to be in doing to change concrete conditions analysis what i'm used to seeing and maybe it's not inevitable is that is that orientation class gender whatever be protected characteristic it is now it seems to me you are taking this a step further and you are saying that change materially change country conditions can include changes that affect the organizations that morning as part of the a mission to be helpful to someone in the petitioner's position which she have been granted relief if she had been out when she filed her petition initially it doesn't create problems for l t c individuals individually personally doesn't materially change conditions and then the court said you know looking at all these you know all these incidences as the work but it violence it acts and other problems based ileum who controls when she decides to come out there so it's so it isn't and it's unusual to let the germination it's like there's rest on the timing of
whatever he would have done with no delay was there anything we could have done earlier to save this petition and the answer is no and that's why you know we look at this the way it's it's time well what is what
it's ok and the let me let me keep going here the rest of the home invasion the armed robberies the police officers certainly did testify that ok well tell me where that how they're ok so you're saying here i can't say but in this case there's no way that the defense can meet their burden of establishing material prejudice based upon because they were two very isolated comments that were never revisited throughout the trial the third properly arrested within minutes after the sick or outside the back of the apartment after being seen three seconds earlier leaving the area with the victim's property in his pocket as well as a m sort of america statements as to what's going on in the midst of this very chaotic experience and decide how did how to address them how much weight is he given to them i think it is in best ways of protecting the defendant and allowing the jury to consider how that they have the freedom to overwhelming that when you say it was an improper you know in your own ad that it was everyone knows that it is it is what it is you can call i have a dog it's a cat you see it's not a question of
course of course there's got to be a direction and control from the employer but in this case there is no direction or control from the employer because the client was not required to participate in this offsite and she's not being paid wages becomes a further injury they've already sustained their working tree this is a situation where the claimant is not under the direction of control of the employer he hasn't sustained work injury because he's not one o'clock at the commission's decision and you look at the first three paragraphs or the first quarter of the way for the first page and the first three paragraphs of the following page the commission sets out exactly the
founders council my first question about this is even if this falls within the rare exception i think the supreme court used the word rare and and  rare exception and they gave us a hypothetical case the overtime parking offense but they don't seem to have plug that hole with much besides the overtime parking and even that state court is wrong it's not enough for us to say that marriage judgement the state quarters is wrong we have to say it was not only wrong but i'm reasonable and i'm wondering how we get there your honor in addition to the light of this person's priors and when i apply that to this case maybe and maybe not and failure to register as a sex offender isn't that big a deal i don't know if accounts is a bigger or  question is is it i can see it in a sort of a functional way or i can see an abstraction conceptual way is this crime and enough to let down the crime and i'm driving that it would get one going the answer in this particular cancer on there is no one else involved other than the defendant or somebody else to register where they feel to reregister when they move the one they have u argument could you tell me what does the state have to prove to convict somebody of that failing to register as a sex offender well particularly focus on any mental illness to think about that very isolated exceedingly rare circumstance of gross disproportionality having said that i'd like the term more specifically if your question and that i think has to do with the way in which this offense is character defendant came to the attention of the authorities that is to say you was released i believe in one nine hundred ninety four so far as i can tell from the record he has no offense is independent of this failure to register a we had an interview conducted by an officer several years ago in which he apparently stated listen i don't know i don't know what my mom i live here with robinson why are we seeing this case just about me i'd like to understand something of the circumstances of this particular record and i would highly understand if you don't know the answer to this between you can be some sense as to how this prosecution fits into a pattern by the state as to how frequently they prosecute people for failure to register you know he was convicted of stealing three golf clubs after previously having been convicted of at least two violent or serious felonies but you're not giving that answer well i must be wrong i want my missing excuse me i'm sorry your honor but my impression is that i
i know how you feel to me but the law must take it's course because while i had him captured under the wolf calls and saw the indians were bad then who is the wolf man well i was in the indians camp i heard them talking about something that indian george wanted them to do anything george come to think of  he has been acting suspicious lately just the same i'm taking him to jail but i'm worried her a lieutenant scott that a pack of rules you have no evidence against me you forget the tenants got stung stakes and named you was a murder
fifty nine was an aggravated felony as a burglary offense with an accompanying sentence of one year throughout his administrative proceedings mr hoyer who was operating procedure maintains that his burglary conviction was not an aggravated felony because the statute under which he was convicted the california burglary statute lacks an essential element of the generic definition of burglaries crime let me ask you a question about that remaining in language what does that mean if i'm awful entry has to be unlawful i mean of the original entry has to be unlawful what's the point of having the words remaining in that add to the equation you think about that question will not be surplusage i don't think so i mean perhaps you're entering in order to a lo know you were the original entry was unlawful right you don't get to the modified categorical approach in this case because the statute of conviction is missing essential element of the crime so then your position is that california burglary station under new circumstances someone's private dwelling with explicit permission but hopefully entering circuit city it wouldn't make any difference he had no uncertain to make an issue of it but well your honor that while that may be the case that is not the is that that it should not have a very in and whether or not this is what he admitted to and neither should the fact that if you look at other facts in the record such as the time of day that he was in the store you're looking at these are the facts and the whole point is that this court said it will not look at the underlying facts it will not look at the fact that he was at circuit city in the middle of the day we're looking at the charging documents and  on any element this is simply clarifying the whole reason why the burglary statute is over god is because it needs to be clarified it's not adding on an element it's clarifying the element that's not creating the element we're importing it from someplace  mechanics of entering or does it define the lawfulness of the entry it seems to me that if your intent if you had some criminal intent that automatically makes your entry unlawful th