i'm going to focus on my lead argument and i'm going to arm walking through three different themes related to that argument and the argument concerns i will walk you through how effectively what's happened is that independent medical finding has been made all right so first a little background to dive into this objective findings point lifting no more than twenty pounds at a time is part of regular work activities with frequent lifting carrying of ten pounds so the what's what's problematic about that narrow argument seems to be that ok well the definition of minimal impairments how does that translates to actual functional impairments in terms of how much  explain for us what is meant by lack of insight and how it affects a person's ability to work now mr rahman indicated that he'd like to focus primarily on the physical examination of dr who so i'm happy to discuss that first if you like significantly doctor on a mostly as you pointed out made to find the only two objective findings those two findings were the reduced motion range of motion in the knees and in the monarch spine those are minimal findings to be sure as you noted and with regard to the lumbar spine miscarriage and even complain of pain there now so the physical examination here is that at no point did anyone ever identify any medically determinable physical impairment other than the visual acuity problem you have to have a medically determinable impairment in order to find that symptoms such as pain affected the ability to do work that was not present here as i said other than with regard to her visual a for that reason dr on a seemingly random conclusion that miss callum was limited to light work really doesn't make sense as we noted even dr on a movie himself noted that there were minimal objective findings on examination so it simply doesn't make sense to say that she was limited to light work this is particularly true with regard to the fact that during the period at issue miss kellan was in fact to do a medium work she had an assembly job a temporary one that ended because the job ran out not because she couldn't continue to perform it she was in fact doing medium level work that puts dr on and lucy's opinion and even less you know less regard but it certainly did indicate that her abilities were greater than she said they were with regard to the visual acuity testified that she could in fact see well enough to drive even with her visual problem and that she could spot a box on the floor and read a newspaper and that was before she was able to get her eye glass prescription renewed so gail jay has sufficiently accommodated the fact that she has somewhat reduced ritual  j did cite substantial evidence both with regards to the physical impairments and the mental impairments the l j considered that the drug invader which ms callum had been taking for quite a while did stabilize her mental impairment it was working well without any side effects and her doctors were even able to reduce that dosage while during the period to go to fact there are psychotherapy notes that the ail j cited too and after the initial took that into account he felt she found it a severe impairment and she acknowledged that there was some reduction as a result of that which limited her limited miss callen to simple unskilled work so those  medium or even in the absence of any minute medically determinable physical impairment and that was deference to her statement that she was unable to afford a primary care doctor during the relevant period so he gave her the benefit of the doubt i'm sorry she gave her the benefit of the doubt with regards to the physical and with regard to the mental based on dr miller findings that miscount would have low frustration toler that would affect her social interactions they l j that also incorporated a limitation to only as occasional contact with the general public so there really is no error here with regard to anything that the ail j did on these two medical reports the a l j took all of the minimal findings and observed what limitations those doctors found waive those limitations in light of the rest of the evidence and of record and