good morning my name's robert tell us i'm the system from the eastern district of washington and you acknowledge the only issue before the court this morning is whether or not a simple statement a voluntary statement by mr quinn's to the effect that he said she said she came here i didn't argument and i did in my brief the facts are not really an issue in this case the police received a report of a rape from the top which hospital they responded to that officer perrault from copy was at the hospital it was officer present private police they talked with the victim they responded to the location of the victim identified for them together with the sergeant kenny hopper was also the tribal police that went to the door the entire conversation to pierson course of situation and effected the arrest of the defendant in the home and that's where i disagree and counsel have obviously argued this entire case from the standpoint of pain when he wasn't if you weren't keep law enforcement of police from violating our constitutional rights and so what's the constitutional right what the defense would argue we have as i understand you have a constitutional right not to be arrested in your home but that's not what pain to us or ready for any the cases from this district go to someone's home without a warrant to arrest them and they didn't say that they said you can't enter the home the fact the arrest has some more means if you will believe yet he lives in a very small camping or travel freighter on the server some three thousand what let's say he lived in a three bedroom rambler shame reservation a modest i guess i don't quite understand i right not to open his door he had the right not to make any comment still you're conceding the still have an expectation of privacy which is not what you argued in your proof that that's where i shouldn't have an expectation of privacy in this home is the first time i and that is the same as waiving your right to privacy now you seem to be arguing now a different theory that he had no more right to cry and it just i don't quite understand what it is that  kinswoman real philosophical here but yes i think we should i think we should i think we should encourage critical thinking on the part of the citizens of this country and they should understand their rights we should teach this then left the home under that sort of belief that it is a reasonable belief that when you're told by always you're under arrest i don't think we should be encouraging people to say well i don't think you have authority certainly the common person doesn't know that most opening the door when one of one of the doors open we talk about losing the right of privacy between things that could be seen and therefore might be searched and persons that might be seen and therefore to be seized i don't think there is a difference between warrant they could probably even have a stakeout to watch this person's movements but just because something can be seen doesn't mean it can be seized those are very frightening and any of that you would have to have a right to be in the ho to be there and he only left under force of law the obligation that any person would feel to comply with a police order and certainly i think judge to stream of pointed out it would be bad public policy to encourage people to resist an arrest in that situation certainly there in my part of the country that leads to violence a lot of times when a person feels like they have to arm themselves or what have you not to comply would please request you're familiar with th to a public space and we're not going to draw fine lines of exactly where he was standing on the threshold and so it was more of an ease about location whereas mr quinn's clearly did not come to the doorway and there's no need to worry about is this an inch