prior agreements between the parties there is no language in the settlement agreement which allows for an environmental obligation to arise out of those be related to or connected to a prior obligation those ten words are in all of the prior agreements between the parties it is not within the terms of the settlement agreement this broader coverage language was divested in settlement agreements so that is heinlein or the drop dead heat would have meaning for the part looking at two point four negative thinking that it's really very broadly worded as you're suggesting there is has to be given a much more narrow interpretation because it does say no which there is no provision for in the settlement agreement unlike the other agreements but what if you have to be notified of in your view in my opinion for the had to have been notified it would have to have been put on notice that there was it doesn't say anything about a client that talks about an obligation under a statute or regulation anything all you have to know is if you have a duty to clean that up or that you started you know this requirement for exacting had to come from the certain and certain point in time i submit to the court that hypothetically speaking if the language contained within the four corners of the march settlement agreement allows for any person to give no director and that never happened that never happened settlement agreement with both parties stipulated there i would like to reserve the five minutes remaining of my time  other places and consequently the settlement agreements contemplated that not only will an environmental obligation mean what sitting here on our site but it means taking that to go somewhere from our side so the question is did the object notification under any service so if that's the case what's the purpose of two for two point four at all it seems to me by the why don't they just stipulate they have notice so what's the purpose of saying they need more of a sort of you have to find out the vertical and lot of the sense of their determination and do something about it well there again that's my my part if you look at that map for example and i don't have in mind which one you're referring to but if i look at the  the map that we've been talking about it doesn't show in the six block area every personal property being affected by the  this potentially a factor then you need to go out and find out if you have an obligation to find out which are affected so they aren't yet on notice that a specific person was there may be on notice that there's control board and mentions a possible source of contamination the icehouse is not specifically notified and i'm sorry it is not specifically identified as an affected parcel or as a parcel which b n has to take any remedial intention here is that there would be no requirement and no need to have a notification if any type of environmental obligation whether potential or as a look at any time was going to be the liability at the  you're saying that it had to be as i understand your reading of this although the potentiality had been communicated to the actuality there was no settlement agreement between the parties contains much narrower and narrower notice climates arising out of related to or international as is not contained within that document where it is contained within the prior agreements of the parties in order for th