record first of the proposed resolution for approval second there is a letter dated june seventh from polygon the attorney representing the applicant to give us the considerations and then there's the application for the easy to transfer licenses within the county and this license here is coming from sharia law and transfer supposed to be transferred to this address at ninety four center church which did have a  i'm holly given on the attorney for the applicant i told mr so actually we're not sure at night yet the prior owner at that location either is not telling the light then i sold it to somebody else are put into safe keeping with a live report but it wasn't available for is up and running already and he's looking for this liquor license to enhance the business that he already has running so you know i know i've been here in the past i just you know he he really is looking to enhance you know this isn't going to be a bar it's more of a restaurant style place where this is going to enhance you know something someone can have a drink with their dinner in washington with a service you know is ok right now they're just doing dinner service but eventually will do lunch service cell i don't know if you have any questions about the liquor license transfer process i can answer though if you've any questions about the business might be more than happy to answer that as it is coming from charl and from planning and i think we should include that it was what it was about so that there's a context for the issue it was about the installation of the replacement fuel station and gas storage tank in public works obtained they provide some are alternatives in their report but the bottom line is they're saying that it would cost them significantly more to complete the project  they have completed the public works kharaj project and i think probably best to turn it over to them to explain the situation manacled the  buildings at that time a salesman came down and toward the buildings and came up with the appropriate quote at least what we thought was appropriate cloten submitted it and we were we were awarded all three of the buildings as was mentioned the public works building the place and parks building the fire station building anticipation coming down and doing the work down along with our job foreman came down to review the jobs and at that time it was determined that our sales person unfortunately did not include the entire board for her entire areas that needed to be insulated into the buildings the police and public other police and parks building the fire station building as was mentioned the public works building was built correctly we completed that work and today we understand that work was done in a satisfactory fashion result of that it was submitted to the township through those three buildings i was not appropriate specifically on the police and public works building we calculated seventy two hundred board foot in reality the board foot a seventeen thousand and three zero four o almost ten thousand short that equated to dollar and dollar perspective our bid was nine thousand seven thirty five in reality it should have been one hundred thousand three hundred for about ten thousand dollars difference the firestation it at a twenty two hundred board foot amount in reality the total board footage for the building is five thousand a to weigh the difference in the quotes four thousand eighty five was the quote that we submitted if accurately quoted based on the true board footage would be ten thousand for seventy seven significant dollars difference we understand we submitted the contract back to the township we don't dispute that we don't dispute that it was our air our sales person did not accurately estimate these two buildings and the result was significantly under bin and looking at the other two bids are three bidders on these projects and looking at the other two bids if you take the totality of the three buildings are new or revised that would be right in the middle of the other two more commensurate with what the actual mounted our number that we submitted is actually sixteen thousand dollars less than the next bit or significantly less to the point that we did not do this accurately there's no doubt our sales person bit it at this point we're asking counsel for one of two things either allow it to be rebid at our number that we provided or open the bid back up but in either case we're asking for relief from our original contract that document with the township we just can't do it for that amount it would result in such a significant financial hardship that we probably go out of business quite frankly we could not take the financial hit that it would take to do the job our chemical cost is the primary cost in our business the chemical that we actually spray on that creates the spray foam and the chemical costs about the same with all companies and that's reflected in fact that all three bid if we would have it accurately were really all in the same ballpark so for us to buy a chemical at the bid rate that we provided to the township would like i said result in significant loss i think that is to allow has or has the actual loss that we would incur and you can do the math as to how it came up so in any event i have two questions and i'd be happy to respond with this this said giving them a budget number that indicated it would be less than twenty five thousand that's right and we relied on the information that you provide that's right and i would submit all of us to defer your counselor turmoil it's appropriate not you can still make you can still get on the twenty five thousand if you consider each building separate project and i don't think that's being intentionally invasive of the twenty five thousand dollars figure i think that's legitimate if they're separate projects separate buildings each bid for the separate building still is under the twenty five thousand so if you're looking for is there anyone else here who would like to consider going into executive session i'm going to chairman like to ask that we do that i think that we have so considerations that ought to be discussed before we