MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
we are loggerhead great to be here today sorry for the late start so like people like southeast asia are going to be watching as you can tell we like to jump around the first two songs originals our last one was an old traditional we are loggerheads and from time to time we like to break out a waltz which we're going to do right now featuring todd seeger to my left thank you very much it's midnight on the water usually we get into tonight by like the middle of the second set we keep trying to quest it's a quest for the missing mythical perfect t my chance to get picky here test test i have no excuses they  and the we're going to stray into a very traditional song called ireland's green sure it was actually written within the last ten years i think this one is the lover's waltz so the newer song it's doesn't to be on the second cd when i get around to it we have a p s a coming up i think know that's why i really just wanted to thank you all for coming and supporting our local economy and helping build such a great community on the market as hopefully the words got now in our market our shift in the fall i forgot to say that our musicians this evening are sponsored by alice had blueberry farm they made a generous donation of six quarts of blueberries which we were able to sell to circus smirk and use that money to we're going nowhere in fact we're going to sing about you ain't going nowhere one lemon for fifty cents two lemons for a buck right up here on the stage of anybody's one we got out so far say a lemon sale going on here so please support that oh maybe they're actually out but anyway i did want to also say that we are still looking for more volunteers for that program it's a fabulous program it's a great opportunity for people from the community to get involved with school children you don't have to be a parent at the school you don't have to be a parent at all it's a very well designed curriculum you don't have any special knowledge you just have to share your enthusiasm and curiosity and passion about nature we have you will be trained in the curriculum in how to teach it and we'd like to get up  for volunteers per classroom so the first training is september eighteenth tuesday morning but then i would like to have for volunteers lined up per classroom so please if you enjoy being outside you enjoy learning about nature all right well thanks again so much for listening we're going to one more to take us out and help you wind down so called great north woods and of course with a name like loggerhead you need to do at least one song that has something to do with longing
to four years before trial and there was never any company in the history of the case in the testimony shows that it was similar gives his siblings of the wife and the son and the husband and making fifty thousand dollars a year and a husband is substantially less than the self employed she was given not in the form and which was the biggest asset of the marriage she was given her pension wife supported him in this endeavor to do this and it was something he continued to do during the marriage and during the divorce at some point they argue that he is underemployed aliya by this factor architecture but i'm unsure that this level of education is was that i thought he may have been doing some draft work because it seems that when he was employed in a traditional sense he could earn fifty  go to her changed mind she's changed her mind because she's looking at him differently still supporting him in this endeavor she wants to get something from him and she's no longer willing to invest in it but her change of heart doesn't mean it was a good faith effort to become self e purchased and at that time the property was placed in the names of the children and the parents there was no time between that and the donor testified that the reason the value of an asset at the time of distribution so even assuming it will blow the are fifteen thousand dollars he walks away with fifteen thousand dollars and zero debt let me walk away with a forty nine thousand dollar has zero responsibility for any of that with respect to child support there is no evidence whatsoever that after the record that there was not the availability of continued employment for m chilled nichols's extracurricular activities you're most to me though that the judge gave a lot of time to visitation he did and the judge was not concerned about the parenting and all so i'm confused here thank you any comments that things that are not correct they've read linking to literally do it every day it's not something the court pressed upon us because of the lack of temporary we do this every day we're we are in the trenches in we are workman like in
said that u offense in the context of manufacturing
would say that your response and i notice there are an opportunity to be heard on any of these issues especially after i tend to administrative hearing
pot and collections of activities and an adult siblings lecture topic and writing the reader narrative values their presentation will surely help us understand the intricate and delicate enter weaving of story and music sounded accomplishments sidney founded new england review and served as its editor from one nine hundred seventy seven to one nine hundred eighty nine as poet laureate of our mark he has responded to hundreds of requests to share his poetry throughout the state demonstrating his generosity is as essential to him as the vermont wilderness he so often writes about it is due to this generosity that he is here with us tonight to share and discuss his thoughts some poetry he's welcome  poetry with some that would say a poem does not rhyme reminds me of the history of order what would john milton who came to hate crime by the way calling it invention of o i have no sweeping take on what poetry need be and even if i did it would be very important what i'm really talking about and i have my own practice as a writer and my practice is my practice not because it represents the right way drive usually with some success to where it would also exclude any number of my favorite writers perhaps most of them from the inner circle yet what would any of the poets i mentioned make of the following home in  i'm not privy into which i don't particularly find myself drawn to be in fact i wonder if the writer himself kind of been moved to write this i thought we can find nothing to vienna and as i recall maxi a seventy two then i'm doubtless white and becoming more so in a way that i don't even recognize but there's a younger people will so be it i'm old enough nothing here with a smart people like the title of my what i know of you with engines and heart lacking this reason and a mentality down in the road don't throw back when all should have been possible but wasn't wasn't oh how we suffer all want to live i say do what you're going to do and i'll tell about it
problems with the case from your perspective that there is no evidence in this record where the actual surveillance location much that's of these types and that i mean that's you the actual location being disposed hop in having the state argue that in the courtroom that the location should be privileged and the reason we're arguing for keeping it secret is because we don't want to harm the owner of the building or we can use this and not that we don't want to lose this location first her drug enforcement because he's a well what's wrong with that  it depends on who's asking the constitutional problems here with this case because you basically be hearing being presented outside and present and you don't have a public hearing at all because the judge basically came out and said i heard the location or i i'm i'm going to allow the privilege in this case without any hearing at all any any hearing at all from the defense attorney no that's i think mr perry and there's a transcri officer that there are public safety concerns involved here and also that given the details of the number of boxes present and the facts that were relayed i do not believe that the defendant is required to know this information in order to fully be able to represent mr mean isn't that what this must happen that isn't supposed to have it isn't it really supposed to also be that the judge i doubt where the location is and then perhaps you know he could indicate in a sealed transcript that if if i if i allow certain things in court then perhaps the whole purpose of keeping it privileged will be disclosed like the example you get with the building there's only one building in the area the rest is all vacant property so there's information that you're telling us about and there is never an opportunity for any argument by defense counsel as to why the location should be disclosed in this particular case because the jeff comes out and  can't determine the privilege should be exercised and that's it and there's no there's not been an opportunity for hearing by the fence attorney as to why they should be out the location just most of them i mean i this case based on the discovery that he has he should be given this location and the cases clearly say when the when the case hinges upon the officer's testimony or what you have basically it that it should not you're supposed to do is make that kind of basis show if that's your burden that the defense is supposed to be given an opportunity to rebut the reason for that privilege not being exercised in
notice and and therefore we directed the district court to is that different than trying to get the statement and for the truth that's content that there was in fact
really this was done voluntarily by the school district or at least it was done on its own volition off prior to the entry of any order or judgement from the draft it was it was done it was done of substantially the bail that you only get one of ten documents voluntarily or on their own volition and then the other nine have to be granted by or i mean if we accept your definition of what the bail means what is the lesser definition of posed in this case the others there are ramifications for someone who plays games and doesn't turn over documents so the spirit of the law is to make sure that the documents will eventually if they're not protected if they're not  was this this guy was turned over before anybody had to file a a public record this is designed to make it easier not harder and not more expensive before my time runs i want to change the term briefly reduce use of the penalties then there is no advantage on the part of the school district except to mitigate their characters by doing what they did which was to give you the the us supreme court then reverses the second aspect of this rule that the legislature is presumed to know the court's construction is what happens post by i am there  decision to not to continue to litigate clear points the phrase incentive structure when it comes to fees and i think that's interesting and he's made the argument today that well this is what the twenty amendment is really all about but with the really arguing this public policy they think should basically be automatically awarded if you prevailing me part of it but that's not what this the illinois legislature has sat and it's really unfair because this there aren't as pointed out on you don't need to adopt the cat credibility to decide the trial judges and no better position than this court to bring in the evidence and draw conclusions now the hardest of agree on the conclusions that can be drawn from those fa apparently are going to be entitled to so if we're talking about a million prohibitum we're talking about a violation that maybe doesn't require a full five thousand assessment maybe it's five hundred maybe it's a thousand but if it was knowingly  the school district defaulting has started with the definition of substantially prevailed first to work substantially to me to be the and then the district also characterizes their activity as volunteer which is contrary to what the trial court from the trial heard from them but there was i do need to use because it was pointed out to him in a question from from the court there is nothing in the statute i mean the school district usually well he agreed to reconsider their position we agreed to the plaintiff has argued that well there's nothing in the statute permitting reconsideration of the position you know this is really unfair to the district because it didn't even know about the pending request for you when the plaintiffs asked the district consider the exception well i think you have to
we believe that fifteen fifteen zero five and fifteen zero eight are controlling in this case and we believe that it is primarily because those sections provide for the authority to include finances expenses and cross in a final version of their incurred during the foreclosure process prior to the sale we believe that is actually the controlling authority in this case subsection see them that specifically talks about core closure judgment if there's a deficiency although the word deficiency doesn't appear in here what happens liability under our because if a surplus is one dollar more but it doesn't cover all the monies that you claim that are still owed because you claim that you're entitled to so you're saying that if this expense of rows between the judgment and the sale then your logic is correct but it would apply to any expense that wasn't taxes were not to sit or be part of the deficiency somehow you're not entitle to it which means that if the you paid taxes afterwards or after the judge was after it your position that it's still too late because it was a debt that was it or prior to the da under your position would it be safe to say that they're not entitled to the back payment for the expenses except for the amount of penalties and interest that arose between the date of the judgment and the date of the sale if they does this ability to get the this excess come from when this went to sheriff's sale and when they moved to confirm the church  is we've got a fairly clear statutory language that allows for the inclusion of advancers taxes fees and costs up to the date of sale we we believe that  that was erroneous for the court to believe that they did not have authority vergers the action to modify the judge in order to include those advances expenses in costs in a final judgment  don't those talk about pursuant to the judgment of foreclosure statute though it seems to me that when you start using the statement fire sale then a day or two before or after the judgment or closure which you told us and everything else is something that's prior to this sale is that isn't that the essence of your argument anything prior to this sale is something by which you're entitle to recover it as a matter of time at their core the judgment under your argument would be valid this wouldn't be unconscionable if the first delinquent payment was ten thousand and thirteen dollars and national us for a new in the motion for summary judgment on to for any type of compensation for the payment of taxes prior to the confirmation of the sale of the payment of the texas
there goes the other way no basket travelling before the shot  by barbara being brought up by paul tended to be here on saturday night in belmont right barbara's got the ball to the right  even the referee wasn't sure what would happen then a nice passer bria goal able to say that nice recovery fighting for the ball down there on the floor unfortunately does not come up with it belmont four minutes left in the period look like lexington's undecided if they really want to press as you said first game of the season john the coaches are still trying to figure out who their starters are and who the backups are twelve to to hear about three and a half  we got traveling on lexington ball's going to go the other way sixteen the fool forty five seconds left in the game victorious arcade bringing it up drive into the net hundred fifty three eighty ninety one is when he puts the peach baskets up on the board you are just a child then john first back boys are made of wire did you know that this peach baskets and wire ba berlin that they admitted basketball is an official olympic event substitution lies about making coming in for  like that bob went out on belmont there nice played by katie maggot alley going to three on one breakaway the basket about three minutes and twelve seconds twenty to twenty two belmont leads lexington the line for two to really work it out on both ends of the floor twenty four call it a good it really did look good for lexington early on but in the end they certainly made a game of it the coach has to be impressed with the way his girls came back and they got to take something out of this game and turn it
all department of corrections there's a provision for one of the wardens to give a copy of that in the prisoner so the prisoners would be aware rightness not on the rationale that the district court gave a based on some other consideration or facts that we can see from the record honor i'd like to start by addressing your question judge school about whether the court would have jurisdiction to require the states to disclose the information at a certain time if it ruled that the claims were not right and we think that if the claimed were determined by this court to be right at the time it would be difficult to see how the court could issue an order requiring the state to disclose the drugs that a specific  time however if that were the court's inclination the court could note in the decision the concerned and in explaining the rationale could know that perhaps this information should be provided at the appropriate time and we've seen federal district courts obviously grant days of the execution so that the living lethal injection litigation can proceed and i would just like to address a couple of the point s made by the state the st point is that while the state says that our claims are all moot because they've provided all of the information requested and as i emphasized in  my statement earlier they still have not provided the name of the drug and there is no other state in the country that we're aware of that st south carolina where a state does not reveal prior to the issuance of a death
communications he in this case defendant and you agreed the state agreed to this response to the motion that communication was was a communications were utterances or expressions intended to convey the message correct yes they also agree that the message was intended to be confidential correct there was private communications i actually don't have all of the court because we don't have the evidence in front of it which is exactly why you and i call that in thirty plus years that our agencies ever made this time for when you're struck with the trial even though it was a motion in the man and that was until he found the consent form all he had one is a police report which would not be sufficient i don't think that was the best suggestion but reports on child abuse the only supreme court said the apartment children family services even though it's conducting an investigation of the same of abuse that's a predicate for the criminal charge of the ship us is not an arm of the stated purposes again i apologize if i'm going slightly beyond trying to avoid learning as much as i can just for that purpose but but i think he made it clear that it wasn't just one individual that they  a new phone or deleted text my responses in the marital privilege does not lead to what she may have done with the phone after it relates to what the communication was a tie of the which is a pension dac the consent form was turned over discover and at that point in time the soonest we gat we turned it over i apologize both to the court to counsel and i exception without developing a few more facts i can say all i want to hear today and i'm ninety nine point nine nine percent sure that the more and ten nothing to do with the later password correct her back a password her cell phone number her phone physically and signed a consent form saying anything relevant to the it does the geisha can be retrieved the she have to know what was the motion eliminate was addressed to the information that was recovered from joe's home correct correct and let me ask you this you said this i actually i think it was mr smith who argued a motion to consider but the knowledge that the conversation and talking generally about obama certain things i don't think she ever value and yet your argument is it can't be a careless waiver there's no such thing as a  the question is does this core have enough and the answer is no i think all parks could have done differently if not better and maybe both  what was on the phone at the time of the communications were made and let me correct the record her correct counsel the fact that all this is years later i was in years later the time she consented it was within a experts say at the time of the communication at the time the marriage was in place here's what happened here's you would have had the exact mirror image so we can use joe's phone at least come
appendix page forty five the paragraph beginning the word with the word finally it's about two thirds of the way down from read appendix forty five the last sentence and this is a reference to the power  reasonably sure separable to of two but nine interpretation that people know what's going on i mean i suppose that in a connection with the second go through on a pair for the first who wasn't great before against you is the arbitrator would not consider any alternative type of discipline the agency had available in the regulations governing regulations an arms race knows it is that brown says if she was entitled to some assistance from the supervisor in helping her to understand precisely what it was she was supposed to accomplish in each of these three points in the second  foregone conclusion that she is going to be removed and there's nothing you can say in response to a proposed notice of removal or whatever that will change our mind and the notice of removal i guess doesn't come out into what  selected i wouldn't if that's correct wouldn't that be a factor in deciding whether it be appropriate to cast about for a position when she had nothing to security during the during that time and that could be a factor
else i think that's where you started your brief but you comment on that whether the court has the discretion to extend that period i started a different place than the defendants did certainly you know and i think there was an order entered on february sixth two thousand and nine by the circuit court granting a motion to reconsider the grant of the late filing of the rejection yes ok i don't know that you don't think that failing to appeal that february sixth harder limits our jurisdiction absolutely not for instance the are three hundred one we did not consider
so that benefited ron go back and read the records citation to the board we made that directed the examination the examination was directed to eat on to a medical causation that's not that the fracture is more haul those from surface activity or fracture it is much as the time frame here is something in the order of twenty five or thirty
allow the jury to continue deliberating right sure will certainly they can't ever be the basis for error for the work and if the attorneys want the court to do something in a court it's especially goes along with it ever be considered it later committed and somebody comes home very strange at all that they would be hit not necessarily i mean this young man was dragged as i said from a place where he was in the bathroom read bound and dragged down the stairs or on his but apparently into first one room in the basement which would indicate or guess would support the argument that he was just being what that means other than they weren't unanimous decisions so all three of them we don't even know which one didn't have a problem with just the best for each is also for him or us so would have been more than one form letter certainly