MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
and would like to introduce jane park president of the west coast chamber  fifteen local speakers folks we all know they don't like all of us experience some type of failure throughout their career and so it's going to be an opportunity to learn from then to understand failure is a part of success and so we hope you'll join  they volunteer their time and efforts to really develop make us stronger they turn our ideas into action that we couldn't do our work without we certainly know they share our contagious positive energy throughout the community and we really appreciate all the hours they spent on that helping our there we go since nine hundred seventeen chemical big has been creating community chemistry community strength security and safety have characterized dozens are found in well we are growing one thing means the same our commitment to creating community chemistry through our hometown banking approach this approach centers on the deep relationships we have built with our customers in communities over the past century these relationships define us and we are extremely proud of the work we have done alongside our customers and community partners to help improve the quality of life in the communities we serve our formula for creating exceptional customer experience and community equipment commitment is me his stronger than ever creating community chemistry and it reinforces our longstanding commitment to taking care of customers and will serve as the foundation of our future growth myself and our employees are grateful to have the support of our customers giving us the ability to prosper in the holland zealand area as a team we can do great things for the chemical bank employees that are in the audience please stand if anyone has a question please seek me or one of our employees out after the meeting all of us in this room as businesspeople need to continue to create community chemistry working together is what has made the holland zealand area strong and now that i would like to introduce our guest speaker this morning dr paul eisley he is the associate dean of the sikh mn college of business at grand valley state university dr s and physics and economics from the university of west concent madison is research in teaching interests include firm country level innovation environmental economics and regional forecasting to tell you this twenty seventeen will be that your consumer again last year it started to be this year will be even more may i want to remind you some purpose of quitting others if you have a shop right now the good news is we came to the end of the year if i replace that blue line on this one we see it point up so we see this number being right now and we should go positive here in december because as much as i just houses and we don't have enough that's not all that smart and some market people can take advantage right here what about if we look at other places we get risky to doesn't me but i can say that we continue to see that the c e o believe that employment growth is going to slow so we're seeing the act but at the same time you're seeing a slight uptick on sales so we're
to have like a bio ware of it with a great artist for about thirty minutes i would need maybe fifteen richmond to listen speak about the whole career of richmond of rick davis and i would like to begin by something really very special that you have been dedicated your life for a long to the most famous jazz musicians and in the world so we did a presentation for the band together just for that to play my music and you know do a concert for the for the show i was lucky i was chosen you know you have to go of the but i've been off you know i've been on sabbatical the last year and then i was on sick leave for a while so now i'm going back in september i'm going to get it going again and get the mambo combo mumbling and matching
are you're going to know who they are by the end of this amazing short from nineteen thirty two now it is so many people just love and adore this film and fortunately for us it has leaked into the public domain you're go enjoy the next twenty eight minutes that's how long this thing it you're going to enjoy every minute of it and it's going to be more of a joy for you if you don't know laurel and hardy because you are going to be fans by the end of this film wow music box that's the house up there right on top of the stoop well i guess we'll have to take it back why there's nobody home where there's a will there's a way we'll take the piano through the window carry it down the stairs and place it in the living room you'll find a letter nag at the back and
wanted some way to ensure that there was if there were a situation where something had happened to the biological parents that the children would remain with the parents  agreement was that the captain would be treated like a parent in all respects and if you can't just dr
dateline belmont is a program which spotlights some of the people places organizations and activities which make belmont unique in case you need to be reminded here's a look at winter in belmont the days grow shorter the wind blows the temperature drops get out the boats and mittens it's winter the snow plows begin clearing the street even the cannon and world war one gun on the town hall lawn looks softer with a snowy cover beaverbrook takes on a different personality after a heavy snow there's more snow in the forecast sometimes the snow changes to freezing rain dangerous but beautiful three more months until spring
i think your honor there are plenty of examples of the executive branch laying out what it thinks you know alice as it is that applies to a question like this and i would submit that the reason why there aren't cases involving private foreign entities acting as agent united states conducted a military operation in some other country and someone didn't like how the u s conducted the military operation and so the company that sold the missiles or the bullets to the united states and sought to get around the united states is needed in that way so i think the fact that example but on the other hand i think it's equally telling or you could point out so you could say it's equally notable that there isn't a single example on the other side of the question there's not a single example of any court ever or even for that matter the executive it seems like i'm at the going one explanation for why that has happened might be that nobody has tried it as everybody knows or assume that when you're talking about sovereign immunity you're kind of not a private actor  or is that just a different analysis for purposes of sovereign immunity within the united states or ins are really beauty so we shouldn't look to any of those cases as we try to develop this area of the law but i think judge nelson you should apply in this case so i would not suggest that the court could be guided by the protection accorded to u s contractors but instead should look to what this court said indo did quoting the supreme court foreign sovereigns as clients would it make a difference if they were working you know with private companies but also had you know some foreign sovereigns as as their clients but the fact that you know they are just solely focused apparently on working for foreign sovereigns does that give them a greater clear you to foreign sovereign immunity or in your opinion it just doesn't matter shareholder and in that context it doesn't serve as an agent of anybody it's a corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of israel it is not claiming immunity that belongs to israel it then of law to the current state in the form of a judgment finding the current state indo in the court went beyond that but i think the ways that it went beyond it are significant and differentiate this case from dog and there are the plaintiff's complaint had their own description of their own alleged injury the injuries they claim are from the use of the software they don't claim any injuries i don't know how they couldn't logically don't claim any injuries are from conduct that can be easily be on the other our government relies on companies as well to provide things like technology and there could be a case where our government uses technologies somewhat like the technology here i don't know if our government uses
plan is going to recur and in considering that we need to look at that way to development which we've explained in the supplemental memorandum which i hope filed just last week which i hope accorded that an opportunity of oregon voters in february and in less than the income tax surcharge that those same voters turned down just a month ago if that income tax again which the court felt was clearly a fundamental may not agree with this but i thought there was some eight circuit precedent that would say that the judicial power history of stand through the end of the case some through the time i mean that issues while there it always better getting worse and worse and worse in the same budgetary tensional rising early and then again i think two things one is i think it's highly unlikely that it would example to how much it cost to run a civil jury system versus how much it costs i think it was the space shuttle thing something in the space program there's a there's a really noted sense of a suspicion whereas here i don't understand violation of the fdic commitment here is clear what they're banking on it back it only went on for four months you can't do anything about him he can't they do another four months violation and again
he's alleging now were the result of misrepresentations they were made to him like a fence a council and i think the other thing going out this is this this was a young man in a very serious legal situation  he was convicted because as there were two witnesses two of his actually close friends testified to his activity whether or not you may have  some discussion or song around them relating to a girl not only other witnesses testified to that and further to the extent that there conversation all about this now we've that have clearly on the record the fact that the fence counsels that i gave my assessment in my and he's pointing to his subjective interpretation that she's somehow didn't understand something does not rise to a level of misrepresentation there was no who misrepresentation  it was so across the board i'm not actually sure i guess you could that was one of the many it was really more of a community misrepresented and i think the allegation was that he was meant to believe that i don't believe the hour said that  indeed the attorney said at some point you can't testify that would be a related you know slogans so there was no question that there was some gang interaction here and it is not a circumstance where despite the concern that you know the courts the fact that he may or may not have known a codefendant well again it doesn't matter that's not anything we need to demonstrate we don't demonstrate that there is a plan ahead of time the evidence clearly criminal conviction period and the statute the juvenile statute is completely separate from if what you say is correct why is hideous corpus still could be collected even though they weren't allowed to be collected and they were allowed to be collected and nicole's did if if you what's the point of having behaviors in there and is supposedly based upon answering earlier question if you're asking me do i believe that all statutes or all cases are logical  things can be fleshed out and we can use an evidence on the second what the nature of the conversation between mr deputies attorney was so we don't we don't know and again with respect to counsel that's why this needs previous is slightly off kilter in the state perhaps nothing is clearly as it should have been the number of different situations and he may have been entirely we don't know who the we haven't had the evidentiary hearing and he may have been intimidated by counsel he may have believed counsel for reasons that we just don't
and after hearing the evidence judge me keeney resolve all evidentiary issues in favor of the plaintiff better and all credibility issues in favor of the plane that and granted the war of money damages under the first two counts record and no issue if that time had been raised as to whether or not the type of
by david the bruce with steal this show where we show you all the best in the public domain films films that may have started out in the originally copyrighted as you're going to see today but have slipped for one reason or another into the public domain making them ok for anybody to use today we are going part two of betty boop done by the fletcher studio t are amazing cartoons with with a character that has withstood the test of time as i mentioned in our last episode she's a product of the twenty's coming out of the flapper era which she was and then in the thirty's when censorship began on the screen she had to give up her flapper ways losing her guard her and her short skirt and some of her sassy ways and become more well thanks but anyway we are going to show you some of those great betty boop
feel for the core is do no claims period of class action case involves one cause of bashan violation of the illinois biometrics information some actual harm rosenbach was are you before the supreme court recently and the decision should be forthcoming in the next several months in this particular underbid the same their court at this point will have no way of knowing whether to file powell the second district's decision rosenbaum or the first it's just decisions occur really not it's not just  confidentiality act so what we have here is a very very weighty subject matter if you want to know just how weighty that subject matter is all those pieces of law jurisdiction to consider the claims of actual harm the issue was not even before the court expressed the disclaim jurisdiction over that issue that issues squarely in this case and will be presented people please feel free to file your motion for reconsideration so my feeling is that the record demonstrated that the judge was no mystery certain about the review at least in the civil law and  work i would believe understands is the so there's there's continuing issues with that a push through brokers well aware we had a hearing on back very recently in the situation he entered a provisional decision and they're supposed to provide more mean in their motion to reconsider what they found in july twelfth they also did not bring that issue up they didn't bring up the fact that it was noticed for the next day mcdonald's responded to the motion to reconsider and raise the fact that they had not filed a written response and then at the hearing we began talking about when indeed technically the motion had been up but there was no at no point prior to the motion to reconsider
requesting a ten year time extension according to all the approval letter and the conditions on the approval which is stated in your packet condition number two will need to be fulfilled within a certain period of time and because of that the expiration is coming up the applicant at the request for an extension one so however so the market community federal credit union put in their rating permit in twenty eleven which is in your exhibit that is reference with that rating permit and so all that time started clicking as of august twenty and so if you recondition not great tool it states that the contraction of the project shall be completed however time extension shall be requested a later than any of these prior to completion that may so this is why it's in front of the commission today i do have mr lies less aware here and i actually do have the consult we had so just to reference exhibit one was the original approval letter exhibit two was the amended condition for twenty third meeting amend it conditions  construction of the project shall be completed within fifteen years of the end of its initiation failure to copy construction of this project will require i finish questions of their project to teen annual s a m e permit a time extension shall be know is it is ok we're just one question you're taking out a hundred square feet of concrete darr some kind of grass landscaping going back into place to  so if you have any questions regarding what type of application this is he's here to answer any of your questions but we do requests to waive its repeal it's a basic one of those candles that they want that the owner mr johnson wants to remodel in say in the interior watchings a kitchen and flooring and that's about it second which would be our regularly scheduled meeting but because of the conference we are asking that you cancel to me so that meeting we may have a meeting on august eleventh right now we're doing a lot with whatever you can come in for permit under certain folks why souls then you have to show that you've been paying your taxes that you gave your homeowners e dollars versus the six hundred fifty which is the regular fee so we are starting just amnesty period and we are getting applications for short term rental homes for people who
previously seen another position involving mental health wish why wouldn't it be wrong and the issue of images that the the defense would say well they're claiming these emotional outbursts are the result of the traumatic in truth it was a result of the j d s why wouldn't he be entitled to it least explore whether there was a preexisting condition it whether it was the damages were acquired through contributed by the most recent events because the supreme court has consistently had that the relevance of that is not an issue that you're right that unless and until the defendant be entitle to at least explore the possibility that normal norwood has nothing to do with this claim it's   emotional trauma or whatever treatment to the point mistress as her case is different and i think that has real to do with the facts presented in the case before the court today apprentice and her family will not be testifying that they're seeking damages for metronet psychological injury or any treatment that she may have had or needs in the future for any of them that's not what this case is about it's about and it mean it's about injury i understand your question completely good then it's not edition that's that's were red so unless you get through your discovery it in the experts says is a result of this meningitis she suffered a it's without prejudice to raise it again if you can demonstrate that it is in fact an element of their damages or not you know i wanted to see me it just seems to me that it gets it's a great question presented way too early because mr carroll saying we're not going to yes for you and i understand your position oh i've heard that before cell i see your point you know let me keep trying to convince  in other words they say it's too soon let's see how things develop under the fundamental fairness doctrine let's wait and see and trust me i'm going to make good on my concession at oral argument i i don't think we can use this in a serious exception where she's going to school and it's not a disclosure of testimony that we're going to bring into this courtroom it's simply a relation whether it be testimony regarding damages that this transfers a result of this certainly it will and it will be limited to  it's frustrating people recognize that they can no longer do things that they used to be able to do and i think that that's a balancing act that this court needs to address in more importantly it's a recognize that the court found
correctly i am sure you do more of this than i do is that those new guidelines one to fifteen are now being used to determine in title and as opposed to part of a comma in other words whether you're you have two other cases pending in the fifth district or one other and it's pretty much the same issue yes ok do you have did you give us the name of that in your library  it doesn't use the factors to determine how much maintenance someone should receive if the length of time as it did a statute now it is if you don't satisfy those factors you don't even qualify to get to the so previously was one step process is now a three step process and your honor my client came before judge german in october of two thousand and fourteen for a trial in this case and we presented  case and we are you this case she did so in the expectation that she was proceeding under the two thousand and fourteen statute because that was the law at the time i guess it's a fact that there was a delay in actually issued a ruling in this case until after the end of two thousand and fourteen should not affect the actual outcome in this case my client had reasonable expectations when she came to court we are you know our case and present was around twenty five hundred dollars before but i may be correct about that and it was reduced to just over two thousand dollars two thousand dollars but that was that was in missouri a settlement agreement that the parties had breached and so that's where the whole unconscionable of the argument prior to the actual trial in this case we had actually pretrial that issuing an argument on that issue before we ever even got to do because we were seeking obviously enforcement of that agreement that was reached over in the surgery in this case here in illinois and ultimately the court determined that because there was no  it was a set amount and it was a set amount forever so the court found an unconscionable for there to be no way for mr cole to come back and modify that and so pursuant to illinois law he did not believe that he could or stand so but it nothing but a procedure if they were nothing but procedure then going to affect the old to make our come of this case they obviously are substantive obviously have created a lot of new changes and they got that for better or worse but i see i would suggest to this court today prior to two thousand and fifteen i rarely met with clients who we even had a discussion in great detail about whether or believe that my clients absolutely that expectation that her face was going to be deciding who the two thousand and fourteen step to i think that the two thousand and fourteen statute was undoubtedly in effect at the
mister wilson for the purpose of questioning wi