MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
started judy has brought with her a bottle of perfume that was our first real perfume and she was eager to show it to her friends and the girls were impressed oh there's the bell yet jack persisted in tormenting judy she felt jack was no longer trying to be funny as much as he was trying to hurt her feelings  till judi dreaded meeting jack at all until she hated to go to school where he could tease her her school work began to suffer she spent more time worrying about jack's next attack than about her studying feel like talking about it to let me know nora was miss brown the only one who was beginning to feel concerned over the problem appeasing as it affected judy and jack classmates who could see what was going on were beginning to take an active interest  finally one day the business all came to a head all right glad the owner has just told us what he considers to be the important effects of the industrial revolution the invention of the sewing machine and the invention of a c do the rest of you have any other ideas all right judy how about you what do you think w there we have the incidents leading up to the i'm happy situation in which judy and jack found themselves the point is what could have been done what should have been done before jack's disregard for the other fellow's feelings driving me crazy keeping congress thank you do you think bringing a problem out in the open peddling if you want to call it that would have been justified and the wisest thing for judy to do or do you believe that under ordinary circumstances the problem otoh worked itself out with a little more help on the pa judy's cool make y or there's another chorus duty might have tried retaliation getting even with jack are ever you go there will be teasers occasionally these people are amusing more often simply discourteous and annoying but teasers may do real damage if they ridicule others because they look or act differently or as and judy's case because they are victims of circumstances wherever you go there will be those who can't take it when someone is making every effort to hurt our feelings very few of us can take it even if you are never the teaser or never the one being to you you will meet this problem if you were one of their classmates
will that the government
when she died so entire life time was so what i can say is without a doubt we have made major strides in treatment of mental illness and addiction disorders yes we have a lot of work to do but believe me compared to early primes of the century we've rebuilt made a dramatic progress so parity for mental health and addiction treatment has really been a long journey with certainly many twists and turns we've come a long way but we have so much more that we need to do and we all know that minnesota has clearly been however a leader  in terms of ad advocacy from the political realm and service delivery and you know thanks to everyone here for certainly the passage of the well stocked dom hope parity and addiction equity act it's true with the milestone we clearly need that final rule but certainly what i can say is from a health plan anything that comes from washington with rules whether they be interim or final believe me the complexity of this is tremendous and it's always a difficult thing to implement but what i can say is that without a doubt my mind it has led to better care for people with mental health and substance abuse and i n and also on the medical side so as a parent acted from a help in perspective you have to examine all of what you're doing and i really do believe that it does lead to to better coverage better coverage ever and better care on the medical side so the next chapter in health care reform is implementation of the fordable care act and again this will provide substantially better coverage overall covering millions of more people than have been covered and so that is a major stride and will make a difference and obviously we have to make sure that you know from a paired perspective that you know we  cover equally so we've also made major progress in our system reforms here in minnesota and in particularly from the standpoint of integrating that medical care and mental health care that we need to continue to work on we need to certainly reduce fragmentation of care lack of coordination and people falling through the cracks we know that still happens and and that you know not to mention the work to reduce the is so many of the speakers have articulated so minnesota is better than most states but that's not good enough we need to continue on our journey the key will be to continue to talk with one another and i think that's really important so you know nothing to take away from a final rule that's important in terms of accountability but when it really gets down to it here in minnesota we have a history of collaboration history of providers health plans consumers advocates people politicians sitting down and talking and coming up with the right way to do things and improve what we're doing so in my estimation that's continues to be the real key is that kind of conversation that we need to have and then continue to work together to improve the care system so again we have that tradition here in minnesota i think we have the leadership we need to get it done
shows this is going to be part one of our october and october is national bowl eighty bullying month it's a month where everybody takes time to pledge and stomp out bullying so i have the best article with that which i think is perfect ideal for october some just going to share covering the highlights with you but because the article the title of the article in this one is out of the american library magazine is called how libraries help kids stand up to bullying and that we actually have a part in it so i like that thought because now they're talking about bullying you can't get away from it which is very sad their bullying and facebook their bullying and text messages and i always you know my my personal opinion about the bullying is that it's especially through facebook and social media it's like it's kind of cowardly i don't like it you know i just don't like it at all and i'm very very very much so against bullying we've even with talk about we've done our own in but they were saying with the libraries in particular the school libraries and there will be a piece for the public library of how we can help stamp that out and they're saying that in the school libraries the librarian or one specific teacher can take it upon themselves to be like the advocate against bullying where the students feel comfortable going to and expressing their five years in their causes exactly where you feel you want them to be able to feel comfortable dragging to you and so they they talk about that of having somebody and handling it immediately of course but this is what there's a couple of highlights here that kind of surprised me and actually saddened me because this is can be such a sad subject that according to statistics one in seven students in k through twelve and fifteen in approaching an adult that they felt roundtable with to help for the public libraries they give us sort of the same kind of guidelines you know if they come up in and i want to talk to us about it as you know as a professional or some other hand that we take that seriously as well and that what we can do is take a public stand right against bullying and as you recall two years two years ago and they even have their video that they've made against that and we had an officer come and read the pledge th
have you pronounce your name  held there was no evidence on the record to find the issues raised in the court of appeals was actively disclaimed and so they were playing air and that's what we i would submit what happened in this case i would say is particularly
sixteen and if you turn over to the figure one your honor which is on board what's referred to in this figure is twenty and sixteen on the other side are mounted on the article or service right  under that understanding isn't there some part of the device which judged referred to as parts twenty and sixteen there are some small part that overlaps there that one that you're referring to there's there are some if you if you look at the same thing you're looking at for your wine you still see that part of twenty and part of sixteen are or are in that articular surface even if you cut it off or you propose that that doesn't mean that it's not and extend that then i will put it in front of you your honor is there any evidence anywhere to show that church and the answer is no there is only do we have this contact sort of on the sides but there's the possibility of disclosure moroni that you would have contact you know kind of in the top as well because you do have this  ication any a definition of that given and if we look at the years if we look at eighty seven figure sixteen i mean all we have is and i think that's important
reach testimony occurred or different periods of time is the judge's discretion to make the final decision on two sure shammai conflicting testimony confidence finding potion a yes or no that's not exactly what happened so what happened with two reports were prepared for a competency hearing at which the district court was required to make a finding whether or not and things have progressed from there though the meantime the spiels yes so this trial is going forward it is i don't believe that it started yet but yes now judge trial i don't believe that has any relevance to his ability to now stand trial i suppose in the future to find there was at some point a finding that he was incompetent i suppose that could have some sort of collateral a fact impact on this criminal case from your position then my question is are we being asked to enter some other type of relief by form of declaratory judgment or some form being asked to be clearer the gentleman was competent all know i believe what he is asking for is and for the for the order of the district court the intermediate order of the district court to no longer be in his record i suppose there might be some hole lateral congress under the record of that yet that at some point somebody found him incompetent drunk and he doesn't want that i don't know exactly what collateral consequences it could have i suppose there could be some i don't believe that there are any with relation t he pled guilty and that circumstance the court held that it still had jurisdiction over date over the issue even though in that case the criminal case was complete and based on that fact bipolar and goes back and goes back to a status with competent but he doesn't want to be found incompetent he's already ordered counsel to just to follow that to happen what w had to counsel during that period during these four months and they both thought that he should be evaluated for incompetence so that no lawyer during these proceedings i can certainly understand why they would they want to do that but i seem to meet that would be under some other civil proceedings and with that part of the not with the consequences
independent film festival
is on point and disc a should be decided based upon the case because they are practically identical first of all i'd like to talk a bit about criminal pleadings they are pled in the  they used the word and you would think they couldn't use the word are because they didn't then it would not be placed on proper notice as to what he's actually accused of so that's just a method of pleading in addition in california i suppose all in mr go in your case the information was different because the information actually declared that he had taken a vehicle without the owner's consent and then moved into the part factual ambiguities are cleared up at the end of a trial by that a legal permanent resident is deportable based upon clear and convincing evidence so i agree with you that matters does not alter the outcome of mr niger case well if we agree mathis has not changed the legal landscape and that duenas alvarez is governing precedent and that determination is that this is a divisible statute and we remain firm on that point that alvarez survives and that the underpinnings that that accessories after the fact are a separate liability offense with distinct elements that must be proven from any of the principal acts all of which are included under the statute therefore the agency adjudicators properly moved on to the modified categorical approach in this case it was permissible and in conducting that in looking and examining the documents they reached the correct conclusion that the documents on ambiguously show that the charging documents sufficiently narrowed the charge to the generic tension but we definitely have distinguishing circumstances in this case from our a good pino most notably arriaga ping despite the four documents that they mentioned they highlighted the fact that abs recitation of the factual basis for his plea the court there could not tell if he pled guilty to just the statute or to the specific charge in that case because in that just the statute and not the specific vic narrowed generic offense because there was no recitation of a factual plea in this case we have the police call a gui with explicit stipulation to the arrest report and the pre hearing transcript and those lay out the elements of the generic offense that he took the car he drove the car know no facts or elements about accessory after the fact which requires the completed crime and obstructionist type of activity so in this case on this record we have absolutely a distinguishing and very strong set of documents leaving no ambiguity that he was convicted of conviction is different it is different we have we have the stipulation to the facts in this case if the court does the court have any other questions about the sufficiency of the documents or about it sounds like counsel concedes that mathis has not changed the landscape in that divisibility stands as a governing process and the score if the court doesn't have any further questions for me i don't believe we do ok then i will cede my time thank you drove or took but the closest thing to when he pled no contest
going forward to the first issue mr lopez contends he's a member of a particular social group consisting of individuals whom others perceive as wealthy wealthy business owners or alternatively a particular social group consisting of former members of that group failed to comply with  doe says differently i think that case is incorrect or distinguishable well here is not the primary characteristic of the group and it's not the only part characteristic of the group it's coupled with with business ownership and but for the business ownership there would be no perception of wealth for this particular individual the second group is also partners or in support of it and get t v this court concluded that groups of individual constitute a particular social group that has experience here would be having failed a also erred when it conferred by mr lopez and not established that the salvadoran government is unable to control imus thirty this i believe is legal or the agency here is ignoring or failing to consider evidence the i g never addressed the presents no explanation why it's insufficient and it doesn't square its conclusion with the i g is finding a reputation for violence alternatively i think it's worth considering if if opinion in a dommy where he discusses possible reasons for this including the lack of statutory guidance the intent expressed in a conference committee report and supreme court cases discussing that dispositive ground i would like under back as much as bad a court need not address the unable or unwilling but the point that in addressing that just the mere fact that el salvador ga there was nothing there there was there would not be a reversal on rehearing and such is the case where there is no evidence in the record that the gang targeted former business members and as far as unable or unwilling evidence of record shows that bill salvador government is very active in combating the gangs and the government cited a sentence in the vi's decision which it mentioned that there is no evidence presenting that the gang members would be concerned with any character other than well i think following that in the enlightening as to expanded a business and agricultural business i believe involving livestock feed and once he did that he was contacted by a mistake gene and threatened and extort i think the next is there is very clea
even though they had the bros decision before the founder in decision in this case as they acknowledge in their brief but even if they didn't waive the issue the pros i p r did not construe claims fifteen or sixteen needed to patent instead they were trying to use the restatements that elements or that the prior could be combined in making future e statements that are supported by the record that in explaining why the different elements can be combined on and i think they're quired under the a p a under schott decision and in conjunction with black and decker that they're required to explain why the prior it should be combined what elements are missing in say for example i told that conceals that supplies on and they didn't do that in this case they said  that their prior offenses are in the same field you don't dispute that but just because part references are in the same field doesn't mean that it's obvious to combine and the did not mean it's explanations for why the prior it should be combined they if it's infringed when you do that i don't see how you can adopt a different construction or obviousness if there are enough to it and i do think i think the that it seems to be a distinction and i have an obstacle detection for the whole travel path the only mongar if you're monitoring for it if we're talking about the absolute section of thing arm getting caught in a window if you monitor for half the width of the arm you're going to detect the arm even though the arm would be in this part of the travel us pro create lee the prior art teachers monitoring an obstacle detection and along most of the travel path that sufficient because the claim only requires it along at least part of the travel not resolve also bars three litigation in the courts claim constructions but rules apply the rule agency rule flies to claim its claims that were refused or cancelled that's not what happened here was ruled invalid if your honour's after that he travels claims invalid a certificate of cancellation is issued that has not happened in this particular case but the claims were finally decision not to appeal from the process of yours so that scenario is not present here i agree would meet need to be considered if that
even water can't get through th just in the right place to burn all this gasoline and here comes that great big
language that referred to the obtaining of a permit which had been in the statute and then struck language specifically or c section six nine two six and the case of a state program the statute prior to this nine hundred eighty four amendment had originally regulated the permit in prague process for both federal and state permitting programs was a let me ask you is this an argument that was presented previously to our court in the form of another panel no it is not just an argument it has something to do other than with the limited rematch and with that federal law with supplanted what what is it that was supplanted the thing that was supplanted were the federal regulations and they were supplanted by state regulations did not charge as an essential element of the crime a violation of state regulation is challenging the conviction yes we can't do anything about that can we because the language of the statute under which this defendant was prosecuted did not have an expression in the language of the statute that federal jurisdiction was unmistakably clear have we don't have or even the ashcroft has the challenge to the conviction that's correct is the conviction still before us isn't the conviction affirmed on gone we don't have any authority to deal with the conviction well you're asking the questions is this the proper motion this should be for the i don't want to make the argument i mean we can do anything about the argument trying to make potentially i hate to use proceeding but i'm not trying to tell you what to do it just seems to me that all we can speak to was what has not already been resolved and that seems to be limited to the the limit agreement on the on the restitution so maybe if you have some arguments to that maybe you should dress those arguments we have
sixty five into sixty six where the district judge did go through the evidence against your client pretty specifically talking about basically three factors the fact that he just tribute distributed israel hernandez and they get the they get the reduction in role and then you have everybody in between and raphael hernandez is hard to find and here is one of the in between people and it's clear that this judge having presided over the entire case and having heard israel testify was intimately aware of what israel's role was in this particular situation and can compare to what raphael his brother our defendant his role was and so it's clear that the judge gave us a lot of thought and i was in a position to give it a lot and we find that in fact the fact that you have raphael attempting to set up
william barker is seventy three years old his wife is dead he has no other family now his money is gone today he must find shelter in a charitable institution but this morning before he goes anywhere mr barker has an appointment he cannot miss like the many who can't afford the care they need mr barker depends on the clinic supported by the united front six hundred people every day from every part of the community six hundred strangers part of a big family it's when you need help and you find out what kind of family you have like blood from the red cross a stranger's blood to service strangers new that's the test of a community the way it takes care of its own mr barker's appointment is at the tumor clinic in the barnard free skin and cancer hospital that use a beta trying to help him an atomic instrument to fight the cancer under his skin  the great enemies of age are disease and loneliness today mr bikers club has its meeting a you really shouldn't take the time but maybe just a minute wouldn't hurt the golden age club and kingdom house needs just once a week but these few hours are important it's a good feeling to belong to just sit and watch and know you are among friends and once in a while take a look at the younger generation kingdom house dana nursery is one of ten be supported by the united fund so much to learn when you're young so much to remember when you're old but today is moving day it's hard for an old man to learn that he can't trust his own ears it must be harder when you're young at the st joseph institute for the deaf children learn to hear with their eyes only there's a friend he wants to see first at the rehabilitation center in the jewish hospital mr barker planned to tell his friend about where he had to move but it doesn't seem so important his friend is busy too it isn't easy for an old man to keep trying but there isn't any other way it's no use putting it off mr barker it's time to go william barker is seventy three years old his wife is dead he has no other family but today he has found a new home through the united fund this community takes care of
person mentioned this group on our regarding the housing and he asked what forms of housing other than single family people who want to see senior housing was the most prominent or
ideas are pretty rough right now zombies have taken over the world but are pretty civilized yeah i think you've still got a ways to go on it but it's definitely a good start he you want to read my screenplay from the internet but it's about people just randomly dropping dead i wish i could so here you want to check out my screenplay yeah sure it takes place in a world where every glass is half empty  where people talk backwards it's pretty good so really cool concept yeah an alternate universe for ten years older