but will allow me to obtain then i slowly and attain more records as this case has been going on going however is simply not enough to prove to the court how long i haven't suffered from this disease if seek out treatment but unfortunately there is no treatment for this disease except impression garments which i can't wear and legalization simple tests like getting out of bed bathing dressing and eating are a constant struggle standing walking sitting or look straight at me now the day goes by that i'm not in class of pain even when my legs are elevated in bed i spent more than half my life laying in bed in a forty five degree have a family to take care of me and seeking first quarter of you the medical evidence to its capacity and make a ruling of disabled this is these are stripped me where i stripped away my pride and with dignity and the judge said i was for reaching i was not gratifies in my own this the court has desperately held on to my words that i worked at my family's forced i did not work there i tried to help occasionally couldn't take the pain and suffering anymore and had stripping that was just so just in one thousand and eight that's not say whether or not it would make my pain easier after the operation was when i turned to alcohol to try to ease my pain i came to came to unbearable i stopped drinking and had a letter from my primary care physician stating that my disease is not from alcohol it's hereditary or stand with twenty pounds working full time job looking at the pictures i am sure i can kneel and crawl that's i can't do if looking at my legs and his speeches doesn't bring to my mind the words like severe intense exasperated i the court my name is robert schumacher i'm an assistant united states attorney with the eastern district of new york and i'm here today on behalf of the acting commissioner of social security here the district court found that the administrative law judge decision on plaintiff's case which found that mr armstrong was not entitled to disability insurance benefits applied the correct legal standards and was based on substantial evidence working tell us about these photographs which mr armstrong referred to which appear in the appendix pages thirty two thirty two thirty three and through your honor we have and i am aware of the photographs we understand that  mr armstrong has had significant medical issues throughout his life however the issue in this case is whether or not he was is able to prove disability or was able to prove disability for a in a very finite period of time in one thousand and eight april tenth ninety eight through december thirty first one thousand nine hundred eighty i don't believe that those photographs relate to the administrative record which include all the medical evidence there and so i don't believe that those he understand in this case there was constantly submissions supplements from and i guess i would i would try to get back to the issue that i would raise because photographs may not be in i believe the claimant can answer when that when those pictures were taken but they were not part of the transcript of the administrative record that which was before the because we received supplemental documents and we submitted them to the court we want to be very forthcoming and we want the court to review all the supplemental evidence who's we which cordie talking about was this my first question of extremely simple was were these photographs before judge that's not complicated what kind of a hearing if any the judge fewer steen have probably not there was no hearing your honor was on submission had been wrecked and therefore the material on submission did not include the show to include your honor ok again a transcript of medical records spanning these please want to bring in a wheelbarrow well i just want to i just want to you know we are simply as a question for god's sake we are sympathetic to the medical records whether that proves the disability that's the review with the district court level we don't believe in it and we don't we think that the administrative law judge is finding if not just answer please if we believe that these photographs if they are and when they could speak to the period that is relevant we understand that's a short period but we don't know whether they can vet period because we don't know when they were taken i think if we believe that that is so do we have before o t if we wish to send back and say t judge if they were not before you for years find out when v's photographs were taken and see if they tell you something about it understand that if it were not your honor certainly has the authority to send a case back and make the direction to the court however i would point to what was reviewed in the transcript and that's the clinical findings and i'm saying these are photographs the clinical findings and medical records from the appropriate period of bedridden with his doctors they don't say that he was under any kind of severe disabling limitations and under the regulations he has to show that he had a twelve month duration of disabling limitations and he did not do so and on that basis we believe that the courts the district court's judgment should be formed thank you you thank