i would hope that we could to dissipate the first of all any implication that any but it was disingenuous there are obviously disagreements on issues i know that the gentle lady the chair of the committee and mashallah kept spoken i think that's a good thing i want to say to mr shadegg i certainly did not believe he was anything but stating his opinion and i think that's certainly appropriate to do i want to make that very very clear that we do not done and do not nor did the chair of the chair lady intend to put anybody's motivation in question we should not do that hopefully we will all try not to do friday there was concern that perhaps people hadn't seen it for sufficient time although this bill in substance has in fact been passed the house before with your leadership  at the request of mr boehner i happen to agree with mr boehner that the that the date of twenty zero nine which was in the bill and i know most boarded i talked to mr boyd about it she agreed with the change as well the change was made because it was mr boehner is feeling and i think the minorities feeling that the bill ought to go into effect immediately the reason the date was put in is twenty nine because that's what the senate bill does under the constitutional provision of the twenty seventh amendment where compensation of a member to may not be changed during the course of their term so it was made fact of at the next term but my observation and i think mr boehner is i don't know what he's on the floor where the saying that  if that question be raised let's let a defendant who is convicted of failing short of his duties and responsibilities or hers to their constituents and to this institution let them raise that i agreed with that so that change was made mutually there was an additional subordination of perjury which we think is appropriate but i want to say to members on both sides believe in this institution i believe in the members believe the members need to have careful and thoughtful consideration this bill is straightforward and as i say for all intents and purposes has been passed i think where i tell them tell everybody i think we're going to roll the vote on this bill because we don't want to tell you to miss it there are eleven members on each side absent because of planes that have not flown on schedule because of weather so that and it's an equal number on each side so we're going to going to wa but i hope when this bill comes to a vote that all of us vote for notwithstanding our different it is on process which ought to be better we're going to strive to make it better i want you to know that i feel strongly when i said i feel your pain i do i don't i don't think it's just i don't think it's disingenuous pain i think you're here accurate on that so mr speaker i would hope that that we could conclude the debate on this i think we're all going to agree on this i see my friend mr boehner coming to the to the podium but i would hope that we can move this bill and give to the american public the understanding that we believe this is a very serious matter and we're going to address it and we're going to address it soon introduced on his way to the floor i and my staff believe that that it was not in the best interest of the house to change this bill in the hour before it was to come to the floor and i appreciate my colleague from maryland majority leaders working what i asked to put the date back to where it was with the introduced bill but having said that i talked last week on the floor about my concern about how the house was proceeding i understand the six row six and the need to to move the six row six agenda right out of the gate but as i said on the floor last week i would hope that we would get back to regular order now we're not on build number six or a bill number seven or for that matter bill number eight i think around the number nine and as i reiterated on the floor last week  we took the majority in one nine hundred ninety five many of my colleagues on our side of the aisle with we have to treat the other side of the aisle the way they treated us i stood my ground for months and months and months s my colleagues that know we should treat the minority the vent minority the way we have to be treated and i think the real concern here is that what we've seen today on the floor of this bill is exactly the point we've been trying to make about going back to regular order that committee process in this house does work and i think the gentleman from maryland clearly understands that because members on both sides of the aisle can pinpoint flaws and colleague from maryland the majority leader to just treat us the way you've been asked to be treated my colleagues on this side of the aisle to want to participate we want to work in with the majority in the best interest of the american  people and we can do that together but the only way to do that is to go through regular water and i think the gentleman from maryland understands and i thank him for his time i thank the gentleman for his comments and as we had a good discussion on this particular bill last week but i understand the gentleman's position i don't think it's an unreasonable position i think our perception is that this is a bill that's passed it is a deep interest to the american public and we want to make this i know that the fact that it's on suspension means that it's not up until that moment we understand that that makes caused some consternation and others will think that that's a procedure under which this kind bill probably should be considered not a bad but i appreciate the gentleman said you and i yield back the balance of my time gemma from michigan is recognized mr speaker i've asked the other speakers air and i just want to add a personal note i served on the county commission some years ago and became the chair of the county commission not in order the house is not in order members please take their conversations outside of the chamber john of michigan is recognize the fact that i serve the chair of a county commission and there i learned the importance of proper order and doing things and regular order i served as president pro tem of the state senate and that even reinforced that more strongly always proceed properly carefully and in order and i think part of the difficulty we've had here today is that the members of the curtain minority sat here for two weeks grinding their teeth while they watched things come to the floor without having gone to committee without prior debate and discussion and this was a crowning insult to bring something to the floor under suspension and to make not just one change we've heard discussion of the date but to change changes in the bill between the time it was agreed to and the time it reached the floor we cannot have that as a minority we will not tolerate that we deserve a proper order we deserve respect and i assume the majority will from this time henceforth give us that respect and follow proper order proper ahead and so i do not intend for him to take that personally and i'm sorry for that mr speaker and all of my colleagues who are listening and have listened to this debate today please take note the democratic leadership this institution plans to clean up the criminal and ethical murawski it inherited this bill is a downpayment on the new ethical climate control system we are building their american people deserve to know that criminal and an ethical behavior by any of our colleagues will be punished and that the penalties for violating the sacred trust which has been bestowed upon us by our voters and the states we represent will be subsidized and serious and not window dressing we have more to do after this bill passes so we can continue this discussion during the next installment of ethics will proceed thank you but i urge my colleagues to take this leap with me today and what they very distinguished gentlewoman from kansas who introduced the bill to began this journey more open and honest government and toward a more ethical direction in this one hundred tenth congress the american people deserve it and it is up to us you and i to deliver it and i yield back whatever holocaust the question is will the whole suspend the rules and agree to the resolution those in favor will vote those opposed to vote no members will record their votes by electronic device