he felt that the petitioner's condition actually was costly related to the tune two thousand and seven accident in his in his deposition when he testified for center i've i don't believe he did he was still actually requesting the essay stabilisation surgery and potentially giving him the neuro stimulators well to try to interrupt the pain signals to the brain so at the time that the injections but the records actually show that he had two to three weeks worth of relief following the injections and he had some really have to be as i raise i mean for two to three days until he had returned to physical therapy and that can be found at page's c fifty three c one sixty four i feel that that commission area when they determined they had it march thirtieth of two thousand and nine was a day when we had reached m r i because dr laith had the petitioner out for at that point and he had prescribed treatment and testing including a mil gram dynamic x rays lumbar spine and e m t of the lower extremities and he had also prescribe physical therapy twice a week for the petitioner at that point and and teach c one seventy five o page c one seventy five of the record our third argument is that t t should have been awarded from december seventeenth of two thousand and seven through the august thirteenth of two thousand and three which was the date of hearing the t t is to continue as long as the total incapacity lasts for section eight  give benefits as the employer refused to provide more than the restrictions even the respondents i am me in this case dr william e determined that mr baker and all were required lifting restrictions of thirty to fifty pounds which prevents them from returning to the pre injury work that he had as a laborer and he had to live between one hundred one hundred fifty pounds on a daily basis furthermore the responded to not make any offer to return to her right now to work within those restrictions after the march thirtieth two thousand i well we're not at the commission believed lammy i don't understand how you can rely on that since i pointed out a different places where dr lam used information was either incorrect or incomplete he didn't have this m r i films he requested he didn't have the c t scans he requested to make sure that the fusion was silent he incorrectly indicated that the petitioner wasn't taking any medications and didn't need surgery or interference stimulator because he wasn't clear but i don't think documented we had the m r i radiologist report and the film that he mentioned he didn't say it was critical to his opinions he said it would be useful and the reason he said it be useful was determined if the two thousand and eight fusion that the but that's something that certainly plays a role in the ridiculous complaints that the petitioner was experiencing he's also taking some ball which is used to people who treat depression doctor lage is treating physician said he too has concerns of pain be associated with the psychological issues and the stranger on the street that night medications i believe you would agree are what you would consider typical pain medication for someone that is allegedly experiencing it back pain that would be something more along the he was taking medication such as insulin to treat the diabetic condition instead he was taking something to treat the side effect or symptom of diabetes which is the neuro neuropathy in the extremities another issue to examinations of the petitioner which included all four of your medical records as well as examinations again on the petition to determine what complaints that he was experiencing and what are you that was about to ask you that because they asked opposing counsel about that in addition to relying on lammy the counsel of the commission seem to indicate that it found some parts of lucius testimony in his record supportive of blandly and or she agrees with that but what can you call for attention and one last issue about the video your honour's while there has been song dispute between the parties in regards to what the video depicts there has been no dispute on the record of the fact that regardless of what activities were completed there these issues in their determination must not be disturbed unless it's against the manifest weight of the evidence which is only the case if the opposite conclusion is clearly apparent from the record that the conclusion because you conclusion was clearly the proper result much which is a much more invasive test for the reason of checking at various levels of different sections to see if the bone is from all the way through and that's something you can find out in an x ray by itself so dr lamie did not have that c t scans that was taking norco as of october of two thousand and ten and the symbols on there are also prescribed for it can be prescribed for the particular pain because that's a nerve pain that the petitioner's suffering from as well know why but he did also testified he was eating he was taking metformin and it was which is an oral insulin now with regard to we also need to keep in mind that the petitioner has a fourth grade education from mexico fourth or fifth grade education from my scout doesn't read or write english reason right a little bit in spanish has always done heavy labor he's not the kind of guy that i could send to my office to sit down and do any kind of clerking or little bag left leg and left foot condition were direct result of the injury that he had sustained back in june of two thousand and seven and the treatment that he was recommending that as i train stabilization procedure was in order to cure relieve the effects of his june two thousand and seven work injury there is some indication that the petitioner may have had some psycho overlay and and looking back or some notes here may see that there was an indication in june of two thousand and i do think that that is kind of the the lynchpin of this entire case there's he's not doing anything that he says he can't do in that video he's getting into and out of a car he's picking up some very light how many decorations