committed therefore the clerk by denying the motion to suppress further as this was an element of the bands the authorized entry into the home  that anyone in the home needed immediate assistance further there was no gunshot heard it was the house was empty when the gunshot happened and i believe the i believe brittany may have seen evidence of a gunshot hole in the wall and there was pictures of that presented at trial but there was nobody present to hear the gunshot or and or it's not illegal to argue with your wife or husband or wife and there were and it's not it was a continuous occurred they were going in and out of the house there was a period of several hours  argument in the morning and that itself is not a crime there's no probable cause to establish a crime where the gunshot which happened hours at least six hours before that the police came into the house to do an investigation of this domestic dispute that was alleged then investigation should happen have the door to the home that's in people the job the same kind of situation have been the police officer saw a husband and wife arguing on the front porch and i believe it's closed off the case so it was actually part of the home he entered the area house and the same is true here though even more so there is no immediate there's no reason for the police to enter the house to begin where they should've went to the front door knocked and found and the police could have gone to court on a warrant to enter the home but again that would likely be denied because there was no  point it's one thing if say for instance you have probable cause that there's some drug activity going on at home there's a report of a ongoing domestic dispute and possible gun shots fired in the house during the day under a totality of circumstances wouldn't that give the police officer probable cause to investigate to go in and make sure someone is to based on what the officers knew and what they knew is that the gunshot happened several hours ago and that there was no one in the house they were aware of that but they also not knowing that there may still be a gun in the house during a domestic violence situation there i mean a large percentage of americans own guns and and a large number of domestic disputes will have shouldn't like in job at that point they should have went to the entrance of the home conducted their investigation from there the statements about them needed to take the statement they could have done that the door that doesn't need to be done inside the court i'm just cover for the people and just respond to defendant's arguments he's really getting on there was no probable cause and probable cause have to look at what law enforcement thought what and if they acted reasonably when they entered the home to investigate and they were investigating the potential crime of domestic battery and that's what they believe that they were facing  came back between four and four hundred and thirty that's what that's priest that's what she believed and then he was still there and he picked up where he left off with the arguing and at that point she was concerned for her friend's safety because she didn't want it to escalate so she would call the officers receiving the dispatch notification that there was an issue of possible domestic left it's a rule area so i took him up like fifteen to twenty minutes to get there when they i don't think anyone is going to contend that a person with a valid point guard has a right to have a gun in their possession in their home that's not the issue the issue is in domestic situations it's far more likely for  if he has access to a gun there's a there's a risk that the victim could be shot there's a risk that the officers could be shot upon entering the house so to argue that it's ok that he has a gun and kind doesn't hit the mark and that he can't have a gun but the officers are approaching thinking that he could use them and that's what they're worried about so the officers get there they know that there had been arguing that the arguing had been earlier in the day but then picked up when he got home indicating that he was still angry or upset they knew that things had been thrown around thinking that there was a possibility that there was a gun in the house because there had been a gun in house earlier in the day  main rush doors open at the carpenters and then the house door between the garage and house the wooden one that you couldn't see through it was open but there was a screen door storm door that they could see through they couldn't see anyone in the house  just because they didn't enter just because there was a fire and they entered because they were worried that britney was being injured so they're not required to know if it would be useless to know basically and they saw in the house that there was no determine if there had been a battery something or going to be a battery i guess they were and i guess you could say they were investigating an attempted this domestic battery that could be something where they were entering  the officers knew that there had been hired to a stick at the house they were told by discussion there had been a prior domestic it was never charged i was not a prosecutor i don't know why it was in charge there could be many reasons possibly because bernie didn't want to cooperate as the victim of the domestic regardless of that they were there was a part of mystic knowing that believing that it was a heated partner here that was later on that was after she had grant back to the bedroom and was hiding in the bedroom with the defendant and then she came out and they were attempting to get a hold of her so that was separate initially making the house she it was different that both parties were there in front of the officer and at that point that when both parties said no we're good we the opposition alike in the court found that here the officers didn't get to talk to both parties they couldn't talk to both parties because at the point th tried to talk to britney and she ran back into the bedroom they had a situation that made it more dangerous for the officers because now they have the victims a legit dictum back in the bedroom with the defendant behind a closed door the went so fast that i don't believe any of them testified to whether or not they saw the disarray prior to once they got the defendant and britney basically in custody at that point they did you research