is number zero five dash one five four two down and gross sciences versus crompton corp the drawings of the structures of the various compounds and it does appear and correct me if i'm wrong that that is material that that drawing there that's been submitted was was not in the in the but again you can you can start every year whenever you're ready i'm reading and i just want to confirm your you're only this is a bit unusual i want to make sure i have this correct you're asking for five minutes of main right no no no in the joint appendix the record shows that the parties had a resolution as to money for this agreement in january of one thousand nine hundred ninety four but that they were still discussing in may and july the form selection clause would page me reading things i'm looking at j is zero two one four zero two two two zero two two nine zero two three five going to respond to what has been raised the court concluded as a result of the stipulation that that in fact was the language of claim one that was a stipulation that all of that would be part all something that was a six digit within this list so she went through that process we believe list was correct and i do want to take up the question of transfer which is that the scorer in the transfer party but the contract talks about you have just about five minutes left we cannot find any support for the court's position regarding contains in this language about you can't make close to ms you can make open ended what is closed and it never doesn't make sense  particular i'm talking about thirty five us of the one in plain drafting you're only allowed to claim two things you need to claim some some physical thing or process steps when it comes to or the maximum number of how a genocide is or can possibly be on the train and the same to play out kill groups you'd have a better the trial judge as i understand it came to the conclusion that you couldn't have your of the rationale that's a rational much he's using grammar instead of claim grafting technique when you're playing drafting you have a transitional phrase followed by elements if you have an open ended phrase you have an element in the market group and then you can add another element and still be within the scope of that transitional phrase what you want to page twenty and your brief you talk about public policy considerations here we don't go your way around contains then it was supposed to mean something other than contains or something got translated that particular argument goes to the syntax argument that she was using per the poxy substance when she was basically saying if you look at that aspect of the case was just traditional analysis of the specification going through and saying well whenever you mean something to be substituted you say subs and when you don't you know well there's two aspects to that first of all transitional craze consisting of which is not a transitional phrase as its use necessarily in a more cohesive group which he's done to substituted consisting of the for the word contains and at that point she's restricting the are to group substitution that can only come from the paragraph and those according to the next paragraph are clearly actual embodiments that's the argument with any other