defendants so led to the stone blocks in an effort to comport to their personal view of what was beautiful what what was consistent with the topography and what was consistent with  well aspect of the work and the decision to clearly ministerial jesters our position is that the decision about whether to do erosion control or a stairway is specifically apply are all kinds of structures for building incentive structures and where do you find that definition and the building codes that it applies to quote all kinds of structures construction so you're saying construction in a forest is similar to construction and house certainly there's significant differences other areas where there is going to be some sort of construction that's supposed to make things safer than they might otherwise be of but don't necessarily conform to a staircase been considered willful and wanton to the county of the page require building permits for others truckers as well as this structure in wildlife areas or natural areas open relaxing enjoying the weather enjoying the scenery doesn't mean that they're not entitled to some basic sense of safety the the but didn't they work very hard to make this a safe stairway contact other than what you just told us in terms of i'm not being consistent with the du page county building code to suggest that they that their conduct was w more on and asking for some details counsel how does what they did other than in your view now being consistent with the building codes will well the building codes represent well what is common in the industry that you cannot hear sage here's the risers are even worse the treads are even so what they did then was after they put these sleds into the into the hill recognizing they had no intention of putting on the handrail they recognize that it was unsafe they had knowledge that it was unsafe so they did then undertake to put a hand rails they did show but what if there's something in the record that would point to the fact that they knew this was unsafe wasn't the testimony in the record just the opposite  that doesn't this have to be an integral part of a trail let's say on either side of it it's just you're saying that the focus is just accents and there's not required rings regarding the size of the trail what about the injury occurred here doesn't mean it's not see those the steers have been there for five or six years now the only time we've ever had a reported fall is machine it so the fact that one person killed doesn't make the sears one design construction alteration relocation removal or demolition of buildings and structures section one hundred point two one hundred twenty three scope these regulations show control to all matters concerning the construction alteration addition some of that and there was some evidence that there was a religion issues which would make here since roe possibly more dangerous interesting point to make a thought about which was the only two people at the top of the hill where the only ones that use this access the people at the bottom of the hill didn't use exodus they didn't climb up there they only climbed down from there that is not discretionary that they have the obligation to establish those components which is discretion and policy and if there's evidence of any type of standard rule regulation that removes it from the discretionary never so