and he's seeking review of the board of immigration appeals affirmation of the immigration judges denial now it's crucial for me to point out to the court that the immigration judge who wrote the decision in this case was not the same judge who heard the case and conducted the hearing noted on page ninety one in the record that judge after judge york and retired he was replaced it's crucial in this case because the presentation of mr new pains passport which was given to the government attorney in court should not have been challenged page two hundred and twenty two that though there were other stamps in the past they were relevant to her questioning and she didn't have time to copy the additional page that marks on the case said to the government attorney your only problem with credibility is the whoa whoa issue regarding returning to the country of persecution and the government of terry said correct a mentions that in there and so there was no evidence and the and late governments attorney seem satisfied with the best bartlett judge never respected him do you have the evidence in the passport that you went to questioning that the government's attorney had done was was why didn't you mention in your direct testimony that you had gone to iran and asked him about it and he noted that he had going to kish island in iran and she copied those pages and put them in the record there never was an issue about whether he had gone to the buy in this questionnaire that only  fairly confused about that because in the transcript when he goes when he st goes through where he got various documents he said as to one document which sounds like this does the but i don't know said most of those documents were at the house and sent by his sister and he was in the context of the hearing he may have been confused by the questioning if we whether he had the document before the sister got it afterwards is kind of trivial in the scope of all the documentation that he got and as we noted in the in the brief nobody question whether he was in you now and what i read you're saying that the order is completely bogus it's been entered because the facts that were originally argued are nowhere near what the orders that  not it's not accurate and the reason it's not accurate is because the judge who was group doing it record of proceedings was imperent the proceedings look at what went on there to separate two separate people at it and they don't match so what should we do you know about that i believe that this case should be but she did like i don't see anything else on his passport in the records can i see it his opposing counsel said sure she gets the password and she goes and makes she looks at it and she goes and gets additional copie and then he goes on and then says where did you travel using a passport and then he says qatar nepal qatar and then later on behalf of the famous human resources the company that he worked there for source for that new jobs and we did not find any new jobs that is why i went back to nepal he doesn't say i no longer passport and the documents because the when the judge asked for a pay for forty six year only problem with credibility is low trial attorney said correct now regarding the cat issue that aspect it only reviews the country conditions and i know another thing that i did want to point out is that there is evidence of the ma joining the government i don't see how that makes the threat to mr new pain any less the mallets actually have more power probably after the agreement than they did before so mr new pain remains in great danger and of course the totality of circumstances on the credibility issue including all the documents in this very well documented case lead to