if she were here she would tell you that she did an excellent job as a janitor for the church however we have a different version of her performance we have reverend injures two page letter the situation in which carol pickett worked as a janitor she described a protected tolerant work situation she says the church hired people who couldn't find were who couldn't get work elsewhere and they worked with her because they were interested in seeing her succeed reverend enter described two problems with my clients ability to work and in terms of mental work they didn't have any trouble with her but her physical proved formants the problem was she actually worked excessively a one hour job cleaning a floor after a girl scout gathering she took six hours clean the floor and they couldn't pay her hourly because she was asked about these things and she would become very anxious when supervised and didn't respond appropriately but even more than that she built up irrational resentments against the people in the church who used the building and the example of the girl scout situation i'm talking about transcript one sixty one one sixty two she talks about the girl scouts coming and my client was so upset afterwards that during this six hour procedure where she is cleaning the floor she calls the minister at least four times to complain about it well reverend at interest as she couldn't think that the minister's letter is very consistent with dr hadley's letter on page three thirty eight of the transcript if you see what  minister said in terms of the girl scout situation and see what dr hadley said it's very highly consistent so we not only have the treating psychologist identifying disabling limitations we treating evidence that went the other way try treating excuse me ok there was a doctor who did prescribe dr lector prescribe some psychological medication and he described her as improving in a did not get clear and convincing reasons for rejecting the treating psychologist and two that the l g a did not properly credit the way witness evidence unfortunately the agency doctors never saw doctor reference and jurors letter so we don't actually have an agency opinion that considered that sort of the earlier jury didn't properly credit what the l g a did not reject was the descriptions that the minister gave of the difficulties that this woman has working and we can translate those interest on real limitations the concept that she's so disabled that she's unable to work at least reasons are things are pretty well set out they seem to be clear and they seem to be supported by substantial others iran or most of the things that you mentioned really focus on the physical side and i agree with you she functional consequences than two or physical impairments nevertheless are not so severe that they cannot be adequately accommodated by the limitations of forth in her residual functional capacity and then he spends paragraphs going through watch them with supporting evidence was  reasons that are pretty clear i mean we're stuck with those your honor right i don't think you are and i think if you look at the snyder versus commissioner case which was very similar in terms of how the court looks at very articulate lay evidence that you could decide it differently and also i'd like to say that all of the a r g s conclusions flow from one assumption he assumed that she was performing competitive work when she worked for the well she said that there are other things her ability to respond appropriately to supervision her ability to sustain a work environment what reverend what the minister pointed out was that she built up so much resentment that for a period of time she couldn't work at the church because she couldn't bear to come in because she was so upset because people dirty the church it's not just matter of how she responded to a provision which was poor but that she also and the minister really are not contradicted by any significant evidence dr wagner just not contradict the doctor had we saw her for thirty two times there is really no mental contradiction here