medical problems in the family whoever she will be listening to the arguments from work on the screen or website she will be call it none of the elements were in there and the entire intent and purpose of the school code was certain about it and when you when you read that opinion in order it's impossible years and on the regulations it was absolutely clear that the school over the ditch would have to undertake a major restructuring which is significant and costly there are only four options under the code now none of testify about how they're you know here they want to be transparent and they're concerned about the kids well there is an a couple of really relevant questions i think for this court the first one is if if when they five years except in the context of the what happened three or five years ago should happen now if you are completely under see your point up for purposes of clarification i was just trying to tell you what we actually happened at off there would be some discretion there with the school district and maybe start a charter school all bringing up rather than you know more or basically fire fire all implement various policies they bypass the whole thing so unfortunately mancini answer your question as a as a yes or no because there is some grit in my mouth but then the school district leeway or some discretion strew how it is going to resolve the problem absolutely absolutely and in the procedure was they asked her as on the issue of when we reconfigure the schools whether they're in the says because of reconfiguration and the other things that he  legislated by the state legislature to the extent that the federal government basically told the stage to do whatever it wanted relative to coming up with compliance such that the test if the federal government formulated would be passed by whatever subgroups of schools or whatever it would be taking the state of illinois done such that hopefully nobody would fail those sieges are mandated by the federal government in order to get federal monies the state exactly goes into seizures they didn't hear least with the specific procedures  the bridge should not have issued now i can easily accept the argument that when the federal government recently did something that you can argue that things are moved as a matter of law is on the issue of whether we did off in the school they did would be considered a restructuring of the school sufficient that we reset the state will be allowed to that point in time different way this exemption is it retroactive or is it in our future that by moving the children between schools results in a statistical analysis that suggests that everything is copacetic when in fact the same children apparently are getting the same education they got before except they're getting it in some instances at least half of them in a different los are the locus and so when you say that there's a problem there definitely is in the sense that if they're supposed to be some reasonable exercise  the police power in order to reasonably achieve a beneficial result it seems ironic but what you what the school district did really had no beneficial effect may be the extra hours and maybe firing staff might have had some effect but if these kids are still getting the same grades but there are statistically different because they are now in a different  there there was a tempest in the record to make these fools here and there was no attempt to use statistical mess  station two three point two five g but specifically provides quote waivers may not be requested from laws rules or regulations pertaining to from or from superintendent referred to in her testimony as a brochure and now he's saying that this is a force of law we don't know when they're written we don't know who they are written by there's no foundation they were introduced at trial and now he's sitting  that is the whole basis the whole cornerstone for the circumvention of the whole corrective action plan along with a vacation of the major restructuring that they were looking at and you know it's ironic that the school  that because the federal law has a sunset provision does the state duma illinois state code also have a sunset provision in it and that specifically although behind the three point three point two does but at the same time if you look at the waiver that they submitted to motionlessness he has peace as well we're going to monitor this need you can't it doesn't mean you can't do this it's it's it's up it's a situation yes that's  what happens to weeks ago two months from now two years from now has no bearing as to whether or not this defendant follow the law in two thousand and eleven twelve thirteen fourteen and the was correct that we had to do something and that out the corrective action player would be a maybe a tory military action under others reasoning however what goes into the without evidence by the time they hung them they realize that they weren't so sure that they were guilty based upon the evidence but they hung them anyway oh it's kind of i see an analogy between this and and the idea that  well hang in there will give the trial type remedy if it's kind of a novel approach that we actually were even better in most school districts we gave them relief faster sooner well then what they would have been in time to have we've gone through the rigmarole of a set where we have sat down and discussed these things and done all the other preliminary fertilizer short i'm not quite sure i agree with your concern about my concern some people have said that i was indecisive but i'm not really sure about me in any event i