MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
sophistication is if if there is a high degree of legal sophistication substantial compliance defended the basis of the conditional discharge the coroner inquired the defendant of the charges that would be the basis of the revocation counsel's argument correct that if we allow that kind of thing to happen then there really would be no reason for this rule just use of force because everyone at some point even of the indictment stages warn the sentences system more than somebody else no i don't think we should allow any different standard but i think that we can allow or  did as you said trying to explain that you know this is this is really dangerous waters you're falling into here you don't have a lawyer in the dependences want to file a motion well when that motion didn't work out the defendant then asked for water back but the judge didn't your kind of blending two different concepts because i thought it was pretty clear that it has church in the title that it's reasonable to infer that it was a fact a place of worship but the question is rather whether or not
especially but but the claimed querrey means has predefined ways of reaching the joint that's right if i want to know the number of cars ford's bottom fairfax county have got to connect four counties year and the claimed method has a pre determined way of connecting those categories right whereas the microsystems method done the same thing but we've said over and over that's not the question we're going to take govern the question is whether it doesn't the same way whether there are insubstantial there are substantial and we all understand that there's thirty forty fifty different ways to do the same thing and you can slightly vary the program or you can vary it quite a substantial bit court here finds you very did a substantial bit if the variance was small perhaps you'd have a better argument and you are for her having heard all the evidence the court might well be skeptical and to close the presentation of evidence to a a difference in one particular use it's interesting that the very next sentence to the one that you read it to us acknowledges that that you presented evidence that they were in substantially different as a whole but dismissed that and that was basically the final fact that was i think he ignored your your point he thought he found that it was not  the kind of question that would be better off in the hands of the judge or the jury the spring court of feyerick all in one or jenkinson rather encourage the use of summary judgment even in the equivalence context recognizing rugby if i read correctly is more analyzing function and finding that they perform the same function rather than the structure which is of course what we've got to look at and this means claude if you compare th concededly these things do the same thing get to the same place we're trying to determine whether they're doing it in the same way whether there are substantial differences in this in the two source codes substantial that's really factual how substantial is substantial enough and isn't that a question that supposed to be made by someone other than a district judge taken a quick look at two declarations substantial or not well the fact is that we all know that if you can right source code to do exactly the same thing in an infinite number of ways and if we're going to say that you why there's no no absolutely no analysis of why and the case law and this and this court has has  the fact that we're still sitting here talking about what the software was or bill is not do seems for these people because it's not even clear even at this stage exactly how the software is constructed but the plastic of the district
by one of his neighbors if in fact he has exhausted his administrative review or i don't think there's any any excuse or any reason not to have done it  determination or terminations the head do with our use the property that would be subject to the zoning laws then under the same act that we're talking about we'd be in a real person is a neighbor is an aggrieved person who has  client's family from using their house that is the only relief corporation is not interpreted or forced it's ordinances appropriately debt is i think the classic case for ministry of review which is exactly what setbacks and things of that the height of the building and the f a a are all all that information was part of the art and was available and was  book in this court's jurisdiction but in substance it was a motion to the trial court to reconsider its earlier denial of the two six one one motion and chance or quietly as a result of what the substance of that motion really was i do not believe that would have allowed the landowners in that case irrespective of whether or not they participated in the underlying quest for variation the effort to leave within ninety days to file a judicial challenge to their event there some future proceeding before the municipal body you'll have an opportunity to make your voice or to do finally this proceeding with a ninety day with the grant by the bill we did not because we did not challenge the either of you have to go back to the village why would you just go to court and say your honor this is or is not in compliance with this agreement well this is what we will do if we have to judge but we comport with the plans why is a building inspector or the village have any better knowledge as to whether or not this was or wasn't built according to the place as opposed to whether it was or wasn't
discuss is on the to the trial court looked into the matter and concluded that there was no misconduct during trial court did not why did or he would or she would be dismissed for costs what we don't know is what was that true or is reason the nature and the reason questions that would detail or resolve what the issue was now i recognize secrecy of jury deliberation but and say is there any reason why you can not decide this case on the facts in on the law that i gave so the trial court decided that it did not want to intrude more into the jury deliberation process than it have to it brought out the jury and gave them and in essence an allen charge encouraging them to continue their deliberate pick up quickly on your honest questions about the juror investigation into each use that arrives here on peel it was clear from the government's briefing it's our view that judge wright was incredibly that there was some concern about a senior jerk refusing the moderate and that was the question and that was the issue raised about the quote concerning this particular juror deciding to read her book until the until a jury was dismissed  that issue did not raise any question of impermissible racial animus or affinity that would have obligated the court to inquire further in order to  concerned destruction of telephones here and the courts determination was that mr resign or he owes intense there was let me start by saying that with respect to the tenor of the telephones see how this and there may be other arguments i'm not sure that i see how that statement compass has all of the actual predicates or perjury she doesn't even mention the estimate itself reason that we've got in town still and the reason that the supreme court announced and done again this relatively rigid not absolutely rigid requirement that the district or go through a careful analysis before determining that a defendant is eligible for the dance sentence based on perjured testimony is because there's a valuable fundamental to testify in your own defen think you're telling me is that we can rely on what the judge said in connection with the rule twenty nine motion in resolving the motion in addition to what she said  offense characteristics that were known were reasonably should have been known by the defendant and then there's a cross referenced application no knowing of would be one dollar which also discusses relevant conduct to be evaluated in the in opinion the word is excluded from possible enhanced reserve decision
and there are some  suppose what i'm doing is asking to what extent if any of these findings by the yield j and what she concluded recommended should serve to inform the judgment of this court as it evalu it you can address that but before you do that i mentioned before the factors in your just talking about those of the justice time and the caregiver factors if it seems that the director applied those as if the children have been dropped off on the street unsupervised  well the first factor the presence or assess ability of the caregiver apparently you know obviously the children on the playground there were caregivers assessable to them and you know within their presence correct yeah ok and in the next factor how long it takes the caregiver to reach the child are we looking at once they have left or are we looking at when they're on the playground talking about how long it takes the caregiver to reach the child on the playground i mean do i have that's the factor i'm talking about  it's all another then another child ok that's what i'm getting at the application of the facts to the factors seems distorted in my opinion and when it comes to the director's decision just don't quite understand how they were applied to the factors
funded the states characterization of this and whether how it is managed on a day to day basis and all of this factors went to the board substantial independence about funding which i think is the most important this is a case about whether bush can be held accountable for discriminating against a young man with disabilities who needed accommodations to take the bar exam section five hundred and four does require accommodations for those individuals who need access and when congress wrote section four using broad language intentionally to quote all of the operations department agency in this case is the very fact intensive issue requiring a complete record here judge geary analyzed very carefully this issue fully developed a record and more appropriate way to confine your department or region have the authority to modify within major purposes of the budget and is considered a major purpose of the appellate i'm sorry operations historically not been part of the judicial branch and so they could restructure the state they always have to have flexibility to restructure the government so here we know time thank you
we accommodated out of respect situations to reschedule and in fact for veterans case scheduled this afternoon that was postponed last week also because it was a definite family that couldn't be rescheduled for today and we wanted to give you the chance to get out of here before you get i stay in thirteen twenty nine mr murphy invention from this and i'm back and it was earlier disclosed explain sort of to well just so that i can understand it or you then saying that in your view claims one two and five for the obvious more obvious than the five at will but that's the problem i'm having because the one in five cover the six that well i claim to this limited to the five that's correct so conceivably we could determine th compound no no not at all not at all simply stupid but it's a very conservative position it doesn't have to being within their educated went forward to the examiner and told the examiner we have unexpected results here are three measures then they talking about we're differences of degree not time you're not talking about captivity anymore and it's based on tape is only missions in it's more robust and that's what the issues are here and that's why it was so harmful to strike result so in effect it's requiring of the challenger to show absolute predictability to be able to see to look through a crystal ball and know only banks what's going to happen when in reality what additional chemists do is they look at lea hold on to the position that they that they see it they took to secure seven seven nine and seven seven seven now with respect to the har be invalid because the six f l has not been shown to be unexpectedly superior to the prior five methyl that's irrelevant to the validity of the species claim
savings you are going to see the pace in park they end tomorrow so we have already seen the bottlers which is very close to my heart their middle school band my sons attended the butler school but somebody gave me the wrong information these guys are middles are eight so i wanted to give you a preview of this year we have twelve concerts this being the first twelve state evening concerts some of which you'll recognize some which you won't reminiscence are coming back joshua tree is coming back to love dogs with cheryl arena who is a local  e john boy in ensemble will be here the four guys in tuxes and then we have some that you might not recognize the brass connection which is a classical band and in tribute to the fiftieth anniversary of the beatles forever fab will be here so we have you can check this all out on p p m apple dot org which will give you the schedule and also update you on rain dates i wanted to ask for your help for a couple things next year will be our twenty fifth anniversary so i'm open to any and all ideas to make this a very special in a verse three for us secondly as you know you can be you can be a donor a patron or benefactor as an individual and your name gets listed on the website companies sponsor many of these but we have some additional expenses so we appreciate your he am looking for a popsicle stand families about twenty years ago we started allowing little kids to run a popsicle stand that basically means mom and dad have to run a popsicle stand but it's a an opportunity to have a lemonade stand without having to buy it to make the lemonade children receive something for their their time i if we have revenues of twenty five dollars the children get twenty dollars if we have revenues over twenty five dollars the kids get to split twenty five dollars so there's a little financial incentive and the final thing that i could really use is some help with a trigger twitter feed so that we can get the information out to you a s a p if we're going to have a rainy day sometimes we run into very late scheduling of rain dates and we have no rain so because we know nobody wants to sit inside so come back for the next twelve and the next eleven concerts one of which will be the belmont community day and under the leadership of our two acid durian that's a thursday art it was the performing in fine arts director thursday july thirty first and the four key concerts which start every friday july eleventh through i believe august first so i hope to see you well thanks for coming tonight and now pam is going to introduce the remaining b hi before we introduce our next man i just want to give a big round of applause to our sound company who has made tonight possible and thank you very very  much and for our next band moment announce in a few seconds also won our facebook contest so big round of applause to the hitchhiker's made out of band members andrew jeffrey george and cameron
isn't that you're reading in lines twenty eight anywhere from twenty through thirty six sure why isn't that a disclosure that his invention or his discovery extends to exactly what you do manufactured as a step yes which is not a sheet right a stand by definition has this accordion like whole configuration i think i would read it he drafted this and  directionality was caused by the chemical bonds interfering with the firemen judge word correctly disclaimed construction a forty eight to make it clear that the structure chemical bonds and
protection and what i'm suggesting is if in that order this court did not say it has to be a two year then isn't it then left up to the truck course description so that in your argument are also i mean our motion you knew there was going to be a hearing and you had an opportunity at the hearing to be heard did you ask to present evidence i mean you know whenever discussion came around about six months or all this kind of stuff did you say wait a minute we want to put on some evidence you know we shouldn't tell you you weren't allowed to put all the evidence when you put it that way and i wasn't on the panel before but i can read the decision just like in the rest of us people the lot agrees in the room here there's nothing in that order that sets out what the terms of the stalking no contact order to be it just says int
to and comparing the system to what's available to you right
hold her out as your gun played you go to my dad about this i'll kill you i want that money but o'mara or i am right and you're dead right take it easy kid i'll be late why is henry going to town so much lately i'll go see what's wrong with  good may have killed him all right but i know we do with bad blood between bob and so i've got a hunch that bob and henry both know considerable about th you think the kid might have done it i don't know we've got to get him out of here pretty bad
did you can then telling you that the illinois state police had called him and she said i don't recall him saying that  then told me he had called the illinois state police and they told him to call homicide detectives that's what she said to the police and in the grand jury the question  did he tell you that the illinois state police called him what's in concern when she says no i don't recall him saying that what's inconsistent there  state needs to impeach a witness with an inconsistent statement that was witnessed by the state's attorney a police detective and a defense attorney or i should say a defense attorney an conversation with the police and with the assistance there's a tourney on september ninth i'm sorry on september twelfth two thousand and seven and it would be reasonable to believe that if he were called to testify the situation where it was concerning and i think even though good childcare was sad and the people didn't the edge of emotion that there was a specific instance of unethical conduct if we don't look at the entire record what we do have here again is two attorneys who are sharing information about each other again this isn't about whether or not the rules were all attorneys to talk shop sharing information from different sides of the case well not on the same side they're sharing information from different sides of the case but it  inconsistency in her testimony on this critical conversation wouldn't it have been apparent that you're mean it certainly could have  investigation and i'd say it's hard to predict what we're tracking about a motion that was filed a month before a trial after the trial date had already d with different people from different sides of this case early on but they didn't know sr had talked to junior and two separate occasions about what this witness said until he actually hearing on the if we look at the other evidence that was before the court regarding the office it is significant for example that even though i'm not in sr says that he has a different office i mean where does he go attorneys so far as to blame for that sam sr was working on behalf of the state i think would be unreasonable so he's representing it to a witness in a case in which the state
hart feel that there will be more for it and as you see we're moving pretty him over time as well as at a great pay and there is no net effect to the budget one way or the other just moving them into one area from the in the following year assuming that your services keeps this individual the way it is there should be no change i there's no change in inherent in what we've got going to go for it but i'm not sure specifically they'd be doing it in different parts of pools interest in kind of taking leadership with that we received from miriam did you see some suggestions of possibly slight changes to the the composition of this board i know also teco had expressed an interest in serving on the board you know with his legal background so i just thought this would be a good time to just kind of have some general discussions about it and he went well actually i don't know what the original legislation these different conversations regarding you know why the numbers may have been changed one of the things that we have to keep in mind that for four years we didn't have any improvement in our freedom of action and the number of minorities that disabled person and women that were i also just an announcement reminder here that we will have alice hospital joining us at our sunday meeting again focusing on the economic year i think we're ready to move forward with the city council appointment when he was due cocksure i believe that we would make the appointment effective march third correct so he can wrap up a couple of the other things that he's you know still involved with mostly were folks focusing on i want tips at intersections to my they're going to move into the stockade neighborhood so people should just start paying attention to the signs the no parking sign is on because we're going to have a lot of places in think before we're done so and i also just want to commend our folks for the work they do i mean i know not every street is wonderful at this point just consider buying snow but i'm sure these folks have been working lots of hours to get a state where we left and we sent it off when it went to the state they left office on so we made an agreement with our consultant to pay them one point four million dollars however when the state came back with their supplemental  four thousand dollars farnum we're talking about this earlier today and i mean is it possible that on the snap crew or whoever if they see it could just take a picture of it and then bring it back and then somebody from the city could then good it is the folks who are actually doing this now we're going to see this happening rather than you know confront a person or do anything just simply take a picture of what they observe and at the appropriate address and i agree that it's not up to mo they have staff on actually writing violations that concerns me too however on the flip side of that mr ols infected and we have had these our community that recognize what's going on and so and i think it's really important to protect the people that work for the city and make sure we can find it no
us a chance to get a little you know some fun once in a while it's i'm going over deep down they'll probably try to stop me from doing that pretty goo wanted the best part of the evening's about to begin people there and everything seemed very been i don't believe people should be undermining our national helps the latest official statistics prove that one out of every tents are afflicted with a social disease unless this is checked through education
us a chance to get a little innocent fun once in a while it's i'm going to deep down they'll probably try to stop me from doing that's pretty goo for the best part of the evening and about to begin that that's that's under the happened i don't believe people should be oh the innocent fun