yes it's there's a there's a figure in significant way and that sailor matter had been forwarded to the law firm by bill murphy don't know what it was negligent i don't know if it was a line but it was wrong and the better image that your dad had an interest in the silent case and the shall not maybe not of it's a good day for it show me she'd one rd of any contingency fee received by the firm when the for each refers to something apart from a personal injury contingency fee agreement that is what you are referring to your honor a disadvantage because i knew bill so well i served with him for fifteen years on the i p i committee with michael reagan i he would not under any set of circumstances say gee is my end client that he we have no written agreement with your name and in so here for or your father's limited to quantum here which they put them out of here there was never a not relevant is it even though he didn't do a lot of work on it but they paint a picture of he did some little work he's entitled to less than twenty thousand dollars but we loved him so much and we're such good guys and they are not going to wade when they hear our age ninety one he was ninety one years old when he brought the station to murphy try to keep what he was ninety months had elapsed did they say your father had an interest in the case and its quantum arrow and here you go and here's here's some pace i do have a question did mr murphy have any frequent written or otherwise that we're aware of with this sound years of this silent silent sensory threat did he have an agreement with them that he was referring to or that he was entitle to anything as a result sure he couldn't reserve out to to me or anybody else without the permission of the solo this is a very one sided dr but i don't care because i really really  and that the need for be only two perspectives contingency fee  is it's not well written any way it's serious terminations if any one of the principals of the firm retires the agreement or done well it's not right it's not right if except in the case of under poor he he would be on the only boost he's collected within two months of him but why would he give up what could be a good size fee when nobody  said there is no contract still there for the better can't reflect the firm's interpretation of a contract that it didn't believe existed with the from obviously very why the letter believed that bill murphy still had an interest in the case and if you read you say that he doesn't have a contingency agreement he had a contingency agreement you're saying that eat that says there is no fix contingent the agreement because of the time but can't dispute that there was a contingency  appear on the judgment on the pleadings the ruling of the judge and the things we've been sitting here and we've been going back and forth with respect to forty and what does that mean i mean doesn't doesn't window it's all for eat because you're dead and we're not going to be able to settle this case and get the money and ship it out within two months because it just came into the office it makes no sense that's but we want to go the firm people make any of the agreement will then come up with this agreement and we want to find out the intent that's why we wanted it and we did request contrary to what you've been told today and in away the condition he placed on but i don't believe we need to deal with hearsay i'm requesting that this court i do what was done at the trial that this this was a motion to dismiss there was never you know what's the word george exactly yes and i must say you know well justice is blind over time courts such as this one have have been able to find a little peripheral vision to do what's right to do what's fair to do what's reasonable bill murphy bill murphy because the hospice defense here please see through it when they tell you that with grace and dignity they wanted bill to have his end of life