be bring rock from st thomas into puerto rico how the will there will be distributed and how the participants will  find any communication between mr martinez and three with the oh look call defendants in this case there was no evidence that  and what he could be drawing for that instance is that it was the very moment that he realized that he was dealing with narcotics because prior to that he didn't it didn't make any what's the significance in your view of the of the report that there would be a way ultimate showing up with two people and then he's in that way at all to me wouldn't that be some evidence for the jury to conclude that well what  person because there was evidence the agent specifically asked who was the other person called a friend and could not give him a name names could not identify who the person nee information as to his identity as to what he was supposed to do and he became familiar to this person at the moment when the when they arrived to the no your honor i just said who's going to be driving who's going to i think drive the package i have do you know anything about the practice is of this conspiracy as to what kind of people they choose to be couriers the only they choose people who know the full extent of the conspiracy or do they choose people that don't have any idea what they're doing yes your honor in contrast to some other conspiracies in other cases the best evidence here is what they did with the undercover agent who was actually hired to bring the drugs by boat from st thomas to puerto rico and they did in disguise these packages they didn't try to hire someone to move something else they were very open with the undercover agent but this is cocaine there were conversations when he received the packages and st thomas he looked at them found that some of the packages were wrapped a little differently and how to actually some conversations with kelly that he was worried some of it was heroin and that he wasn't charging the appropriate price so the evidence of the way this conspiracy worked is that when they brought someone in to transport the drugs that person was well aware of what was going on  statement was so not at the very last moment and he said he was recruited by somebody named charlie and the jury heard testimony that charlie is a nickname for carlos when you see this that just repeats the beginning in the case right he statement is that he was recruited not for drugs but just for the run there to pick up something correct well his testimony was that he knew it was something illegal but not drugs that's his story know i'm sorry my my what i'm trying to explain is that there's an additional link that was testified at trial that he was a coup someone named charlie who was actually part of the drug trafficking organization that was a carlos in the gray car with pedro whip kelly it's one  between the defendant and the drug trafficking organization in addition the person that he was with remember the testimony was that there would be two people coming in the white nissan to pick up the drugs in his statement he referred to that other person as his good friend ramon copeland it wasn't a stranger it wasn't someone that he just met for the purpose of picking up these drugs he had that connection as well that relationship existed in addition there's no  evidence of surprise or what his reaction was anything other than home acceptance when he actually saw the drugs touched the drugs the agent testified that he seemed to test the consistency of the bricks consistent with checking to be sure that they were what they appeared to be and in fact the agent said quote he seemed like he knew what he was when he was asked about martinez or any of the jury was entitled to credit scuse me to credit that testimony we respectfully submit to score that in this case the government failed to meet his burden of proof and therefore there was no everything