think it's even with the maybe even a piece of westwood on the northern side by o c ana as a result of that intersection where there's a residential property is  one of the things that i think the attorney general may not have said it directly but one of the things that i think it was sort of from well the opinion was the how and why the public ability of a by law disregard anything i might be saying but if i just understood the byelaw proposed revision that you are considering tonight was prepared today i think that's problematic under chapter forty section five in order to amend the bylaws townhouse to do a couple things but one of the things it has to do is advertise this hearing for two consecutive weeks in advance and a newspaper and that advertisement is supposed to how well informed people who may want to come and make a case for or against where they can inspect the pileup i don't believe that happened in this case and i'm concerned that there was a rush here because of the expediency of timing a town meeting and the circumstances of when the attorney general issued her decision  think this board may be on perilous ground if it considers an advertisement that did not reference where or by a lot could be inspected because that by law didn't even exist two weeks ago and informed and concerned people stakeholders would not be given an adequate opportunity to come and make their case to the board so i think that's a significant procedural problem you obviously have your own counsel to take your own counsel's advice but i really caution the board what i think is a problem the second thing i want the board to just consider first of all the freetown by law we know something about it because we were involved in the attorney general's decision as well the overlay district was part of an overlay district that imposed special permits on various uses and what the attorney general says in her opinion is that the special permit for access was coextensive with a special permit for uses in other words you could create a permit that relates to the underlying discretionary permit and the reason for that is because for over almost a century since automobiles were in the norm massachusetts has recognized that there is a common law right when a landowner owns property that abuts a public way to access that you can regulate what i can do on my land call it commercial call it residential once you create a zoning district you can't deny some people in that district the right to access the street by creating a separate discretionary permit you can reasonably regulate that access we know it is on the street how wide it is dimensions but you can't open it lee deny it and i don't see in this language a recognition of that if you look at the existing curb cut by a law that is in the town's ordinances it says expressly that it can't be on reason withheld or denied i don't see any of that language and i think that you're  to run into more trouble if you go down the path of an aggressive frankly rushed through by a law that has been you'll consider because it was just good it's a tricky question because you know a complicated project like this takes a year to get perky and if someone could get through that process during the moratorium that might do a couple things that might inform what you want to do with your file you know you changes to the aisle that would guide that future application so i think we've been talking about that project for several years now and we're continuing to discuss it and you could continue to convert for the board to discuss it and formally be could not apply for as  residential special permit if town meeting it's based on a by law that is used in weston that's been successful there the board noted that miss considering approving him but still had some questions as to whether that was the probably way to go whether something closer to what we have now with the appropriate or whether something completely different  todays style law that requires you to just go through the standard special permit process and then the change and never ends up being something completely different the board would not be able to review it under the new buy not they'd still be reviewing under the old by law which they've already thrown away how many how many senior units are we going to create and how much of an impact is it going to have on the community i don't think it's going to have much of an impact and i think it's very unfair there you are imposing proposing to impose a mor was not in favor of that they do want to continue to see new residential development but they want to find a way that allows for us to encourage the residential development that is appropriate to the existing neighborhoods and beneficial to  so busy with some other stuff and sort of you know we were working on it so recently called let's get this going again and unfortunately the  that we also heard from the first meeting from some concerns from from the neighborhood of one of the so called no name road which is this road right here in the last  keep accessing the property speaking of some of the other reasons we'll just touch base real quick there i think there's at least three water easements to work for water lines echoed through the property to the other one is for the building itself and the access to it entries kind of line up nicely this is kind of these this one's kind of accuracy and then forced us to get one so we come around the corner and we get to this one and this this current path here is more designed suggesting that that the standard first for for rainfall might be conservative these days given the changes that are occurring in the climate that kind of thing so would be interesting to see what the differences in the ability to store and and manage that water is when using a higher level right well and when we were planning this whole glacier every area years ago there was we were all with the f m you already and all that were really trying to get the whole property  redevelopment at once and one of the reasons for doing that was the storm water question because each property owner comes out and or i can do this and i can do this and then we get them all done and back here you know we're near what needed to be done so we certainly don't want to impose anything on anybody who it is who isn't causing the problem but on the early end we certainly don't want to miss an opportunity to contribute to correcting a longstanding problem in this area so i don't know exactly what needs work what the possibilities are here better but again i don't think we want to miss an opportunity if something to be done in conjunction with this redevelopment help correct that problem as much  saw the dealerships on the side and the garage doors are open what i'm looking for i guess is in force somehow that that stray guy that comes down with the dumpster at three o'clock in anywhere right and you know why why wouldn't being a doctor or