sort of like a college campus over there with a lot of tech and and also manufacturing components were just north of the fuel depot there's in silos so we're about twenty five hundred feet from the can form the proper this is a good thing because the weight of this operation is proposed to be operated they would phase in the mining only five acres or so would be actually excavated at a time meanwhile the remaining yury would be first farm and then leader would be a small way that would grow over time as the operations continued and reclamation plant was developed and met in consistent with the county's ordinance w they had seen in fact we also presented the testimony to very substantial customers of sand and gravel and if your area can testify that team only fifty percent or more very substantial financial outlay they have been able to make this property just break that is not what the property is it is clearly not  and i don't think that's the standard the question is it's mine of the factors that needs to be considered alongside the primary factors of consistency with its runway and he says and one final question for you you say that the dollars and years of litigation on this is so what more could they possibly done answer that question is simple two they could've chosen a different location one that's actually appropriate for this use that they could have also asked to retain experts who regularly perform full looking at briefly each of them all as witness says they presented robert archibald as an expert in mining valuations his opinion essentially is that the fair market value of the land for farming today is less than the cash flow it will produce over thirty years value lower for his purposes we can estimate the average annual cash flow of the property for farming because i'm a is managing partner standing next time i testified that the farm cash was two hundred to three hundred thousand dollars a year i'm birch as ms miers mentioned was presented as an expert civil engineer they largely relied on the fact that he prepared a spreadsheet of surrounding uses and zoning in nearby property drafted a second spreadsheet to go look at a half mile radius that showed that there were one hundred sixty seven residences and one hundred twenty four parcels ninety six of those are at one parcel because it's a mobile park that still shows that more than total would actually be semi truck loaned by about thirty percent i am allies accounts the current truck traffic is all to the south with the current industrial development is there proposing to move our expanded national used by two an additional pathway for that contamination the open body of water he also testified that numerous private wasn't just in the area but they could be protected from potential contamination by installing marching miles which is standard in the interest even this type of a mine but i his opinion from what it really was a problem with that is that the underlying data didn't change the number of private loans in the area didn't change from what he said there are numerous wells that could be protected to saying now they're  are agricultural uses on three out of four star along with residential there's as mr leavitt admitted that he's actually really particular about how his saying go watch finally both max time in the hood and it is that it would be pure speculation on their part to say whether this particular pit had a lot of stand versus very very briefly because i think it's interesting i think most of the facts that were  mechanic ten and look for issues in these experts reports and then that is that is the job that's fine that's what i one does when one does not have one's own expert testimony that contradicts taken as a whole bill is self factors support the issuance of the special used and clearly they do this is a question this is a very fundamental question about what one can do with one's this is under advisement and earning