us department of labor's wage in our division on october tenth of two thousand and twelve that which in our division actually claimed never existed so if i made a timely complaint to the u s department of labor's which in our division three years out three years after the us government accountability office conducted an undercover audit of it that confirmed that it was improperly recording complaints was not conducting invest invest a geisha ins the complaints i made to the u s department of labor on a professional day when in fact it's not when there's nothing in that contract that's where a fraud also judge some of my are when she was assigned to the second circuit with regards to  she june fifteenth two thousand and one she stated to show that extraordinary circumstances prevented him from filing his petition on time petitioner must demonstrate a causal relationship between the extraordinary circumstances on which the claim  filing so essentially if i'm not paid what i'm owed that's going to have collateral collateral consequences is going to severely impact my ability to pay my rent so between it two thousand and thirteen and two thousand and fifteen thousand sixteen i was engaged in substantial litigation for landlords due to the hardships of paying my rent due to implement matters i had a twelve month contract with credit suisse to work into in two thousand twelve when i was fired i had nine months left on that contract  when i was fired i experienced a shortfall of earnings of seventy percent meaning from the time i was fired the next set of jobs i had that was a sunny sunny percent drop off in earnings so obviously that's going to of impact does a detrimental impact on my ability to pay my bills also after this case was dismissed by a judge show field related litigation at the state court of the civil court she issued a decision  eighth two thousand sixteen where she stated the court does not have the power under the civil court act to grant such as compelling defendant to pay the cost of arbitration if that is what plaintive seeks he must pursue it in a court with equitable powers such as this one and the lower district court so if i was specifically directed by the state court that if i sought to have the arbitration clause modified such that i would actually it would actually be possible for me to engage in arbitra feels reasoning to not allow supplemental jurisdiction to occur was because the state court and already made a determination i had to proceed with arbitration status do you have any pending appeal court no only because i don't have the finances to pursue them i'm standing in front of you six years after this which have occurred judgments against me because of the landlord litigation so essentially it's not possible for me to pursue those remedies also in the while i was with the judge show field i the suggestion was the credit suisse had initiated that firing so the problem is in my contract it said that n t t was required to communities notice in the event a fire was to occur that never happened there emails after emails confirming i was engaged in protected because i wasn't being paid on time because credit suisse was controlling how i worked the number of hours that was worked so essentially i was a misclassified misclassified independent contractor of joint employers and data and credit suisse unfortunately i've been only been given five minutes to argue today so i'm constrained because of that your adversary now and if we have some additional questions after we've heard from him we may give you another minute  pills pending in the state court that's not entirely true i did file a notice of appeal of a state court decision granting us sanctions for the filing of a fourth frivolous motion for reconsideration of rehearing in state court  that appeal is as as i say noticed but has not been perfected what about the anything pending in the trial court or are those proceedings over those proceedings aside from that unpro so sorry for the oversight yes i do have an appeal pending but like i stated there was never any determination made what it was possible for me to engage in arbitration with the entity in the first place at the outset of the state court proceeding their motion to compel arbitration w actually dismissed denied i should say by judge peter moulton i think that was on july third of two thousand and thirteen so only after it was first tonight did judge schecter granted without conducting a detect an assessment as to whether it was actually financially the city of new york government agencies because it's coming out my wallet to fund the same company that's been committing which against me so right now i'm a legal guardian for my mom i have extraordinary circumstances i'm legally evicted from my apartment in october of two thousand fifteen my mom had a stroke i had to pursue legal guardianship so essentially i visit my mom every week and to look after needs there isn't this isn't just a cut and dry case like i said if you if the roles were reversed if you weren't paid for their services that you're performing if i worked at credit suisse of four to three different periods twice in japan i came back to new york and t said you can work for credit suisse again on the condition that we're going to give you the opportunity to do so as an independent contractor with full control over how you do your work over the hours that you work every aspect of it instead the let that slide credit suisse controlled every aspect of how i worked for it and let