very great she married a man who was at that point in time working and while she was residing here at this point in time and my client really we are was residing in downtown chicago bridgeport here again the south side proximate uyghurs factors are obviously the factors which the trial court relied upon and tempted at least to apply this case there's three major factors at the trial or if you can consideration there's only three major factors that we br walsh for there to skate expenses were his actual expenses were within the state of alabama there's no expense is demonstrated no shortfalls spence's demonstrated by ms walters while she was residing with her mother here in frankfurt w nearly as much as ms walsh would have the court believe because actually she's only working in increases at least she didn't have and cross examination approximately one hour per day during the school year that she would be with a child as opposed to well just because he's going to go to work he can actually put the child daycare aide they're requiring is when you see you say that you should we should be grander removal so that we don't have employee day here but by the way during your periods of visitation you should go ahead and put the child in daycare or have family members care for the child and the family members is also a crucial part of this case as judge did find it to be a very closely knit family my client as well as very strong relationships m during her testimony that the child had at least as exemplary a relationship with her as her maternal grandmother and that she would see her maternal grandfather things twice per month on the flip side  times carol herself and only been there one time for four days easter weekend of two thousand and ten is well she never been to the schools when she tried home the schools down alabama the only people she was able to alabama because she was going to be everything that she has here in the amount of things that she had here especially consideration of visitation reduction in my prior head on judge graham's words he went from seventy one approximately twenty seven hundred hours it would cost for one ten day trip to go down to alabama but the core never addressed whether or not we're putting a child on a plane by am by herself whether his will should be traveling or if both parties would be required to use a trailer the only everything that she has here but work for us in her new situation where her new stepfather says yes it's usual that four times for five years that i'll be living in five different or four different states no cap possibly even a child's best the child factor or factors led to the conclusion it was in the best interest of the trial court found that the life of the mother and the child would be enhanced if if quality of life the mother's with regard to the mother's quality of life no with regard to the child's life yes because the mom would be able to be more involved in the child's life by the child not being  agreed that it was better for carly to be with the parents rather than in daycare in addition all in this most testified that by being a stay at home mom she would have more of an opportunity to volunteer at the child's school and to participate in field trips and whatever else they needed parents to  financial situation was but she was still working when she was here in illinois with regard to the issue of enhancement another factor in the record while i agree with counsel that the information on the schools was simply downwind from the internet one thing that miss most testified to was that the low key element your school was experiencing cutbacks in several areas including gym classes are classes next curricular activities and that based on her research her in school was not experiencing those car and that is also a factor that the court to consider and finding that the child's life would be court articulated in his findings that yes dad had a close relationship with the child and you know her size his visitation alternating weekends which amounts to about a day in order much less than one day and a half and yes he the parties cooperated and he was able to us or his visitation be there at ten or eleven but he never exercised me visitation he had six weeks of vacation time from a poignant and the only reason why in addition there was a time during the summer even if he didn't think that carly was ready to go for overnight what he could have taken her for a day or for several afternoons several different weeks in the summer he chose not to do that you're  weekend for fourth of july so based on the time that he actually did exercise by my calculations it's about thirty seven and a half days compared to  forty nine days of vacation time which coincides with the seven weeks that he has off the park should he choose to take it that he is given more time in addition the court considered whether or not he relationship a close relationship of course being in the best interests of the child dad has been given and seven weeks of vacation it shouldn't choose to take off from work if he wishes he can take six having to pay for daycare and also there's a surplus in his income that if you want if he needs to if you want to hire someone to be with carly while he's at work i'm awfully tough to work as it works overnight he has the choice to do that and based on how much time he shares with his family especially if you choose the i don't think it's an army snowball if it's in the reasonable expectation although it's up to him in addition based on the savings from not having to pay for daycare in the entire cost of the child coming to illinois hell have the savings of three thousand two hundred sixteen dollars a year he estimated that a trip to moreover in addition to the forty nine days it is contemplated by the court based on the evidence before it that mom would be returning to illinois for a long weekend in for alternate holidays so again it is incorporated in the corner and it was articulate that particular nick the trial court that he expected the mom would be returning to illinois with carly and that dad would have additional this attention on their minds on trips back with respect to the issue of potential harm based on the change in the visitation schedule there is minimal evidence on on this issue while mr weir testified that he would be crushed and his family testified that they would be devastated the only testimony with regard to harm to carlie much from this involved she was asked the question didn't she think it would be detrimental to the father child relationship that movie was allowed and she said no  believed the age that they were being necessary adjustments but know that it would not be detrimental what council will reset it this is evidence that carly don't want to go i actually was offered her state of mind the way that is presenting it is hearsay and all she said was that she would miss everything everyone that she knows is here this is not a case where the child has improved on her friends that she's going to miss and while i have no miss to minimize the relationship with the extended family the extended relationship the relationship with the extended family well michelle your testified it testified that she started seeing charlie on a regular basis and alternating weekends in november of two thousand and nine of them are two thousand and nine two so why of two thousand and ten is a very short period of time so even there there was this strong relationship that was built relationship where she spends time with people and based on how either perspective i believe that it was that the court was entitle to consider that she could maintain close contact with her to me that because she's no winner floyd there will be no need for before or after school kids daycare she would have more time to spend with the children not in school which in my opinion would also his general quality of life of the child very with all respect  care provider it seems needed can't ignore the realities i think is exactly right see my reply brief ignores the realities of the twenty first century life that people have these days or more often than perhaps they did twenty thirty years ago maybe even ten years ago prior to the rule titian being filed moreover this was as testimony was i gave mr weir the schedule for the school for the twenty ninth we can school year