or i want to make the court aware that i am very dyslexic so sometimes that reads documents just bear with me for a minute so this this case sean or i think we're here today to right the wrongs perpetrated on me by my in my family by all c by the lower courts failure to abide by my constitutional rights the due process and and following what supposed to be the norm and impartial legal procedures in so an afghan causing huge harm to my state in my true creditors the two main illegal actions taken by the lower court were stripped or stripping away of my attorney at a critical moment in this procedure without proper notice coupled with the failure to afford us the time to prepare for this change by allowing the attorney filed his motion to withdraw on the th around five o'clock and the order was granted timely on the th by judge beasley they all knew that i was working out of state they had notice that i was working out in the state trying to restore power to to the state because i work for that energy and they knew that i was  working in an area where i had no no internet or service my attorneys are well well aware of it and so was the court solicitor thomas mr tom judge and the the record that i'm familiar the nd which is when the court actually entered the order granting the relief to allow the part the the council to withdraw and you were present the record reflects at that hearing and you didn't object to the that not part of the record yes your honor that is part of the record but if you look at the record i wasn't even allowed to speak until age eighteen of the transcript you know judge beazley railroaded me through this thing from the very beginning i had no idea that my counsel was resigning and i found out the day they're going to court that's not proper notice and if they were to put it in the mail on the th i would never received it because i was working out of town and they knew it they knew i was because i was not communicating with them they knew that i could communicate with what was before six in the morning before i started my shift where we had internet and at six at night and on saturdays and so i was i was and communicating back and forth with them in the record shows plenty e mails going back and forth with me in my attorneys and the reason that me in my attorneys had some dispute is because the your honor i want to answer your question respectfully right you are right there i didn't object but i'm not an attorney i did know that i had the right to object or not i've never represented myself in a court case i've always had an attorney in so i don't know the rules of the court and i have a disability and so i didn't know that i was supposed to object at that time you know i did was not given the opportunity to file a brief stating that you know the evidence why i didn't want my attorney to to resign and if you look it's the document that exhibit number two in my reply brief in the st motion you will see the e mails that that were sent to the attorney and the and my displeasure with my attorney was we had a sale agreement that was already done my the boat of say if you think you could have said virtually anything you didn't say anything and if you would have said anything that would have compelled an attorney to continue to work for you with that kind of  you're going to convince us that it wasn't appropriate to say you guys need to part ways there may be a question about your nd point which is can i get somebody else in yes that's that's correct but i thought i could resolve those issues with my attorney if i thought that they were resolved well i wasn't to the point where you know i wanted my attorney to resolve them i wanted him to file another motion with the courts to the sale go through they drafted the  law says that a tourney cannot remove them so if they came from the case of that sort of critical juncture and by him removing himself my o o c was no longer represented which only ever and then when i asked judge beasley if i could get it to we continue his which i didn't think was extreme to get counsel so that my l l c could be represented i was denied that you process rights for women to vote let me focus you just respect going on on what what we're really dealing with today discharge your assets membership interest in the l l c not ownership of the emerald but just your ownership of the of the you know the membership interest that's what was was was not whether the sale should have been conducted not whether the trustee should have been appointed in the other case not whether that case should have been converted none of that that issue runnable you are here on your own only representing yourself and your wife in your  insurance on the m and that was not about reason to convert me to chapter seven emerald was in a secure vault and it didn't require insurance the damage was your duty as a reason you're giving me a reason gave the other assets in in my estate control to the trustee in the trustee sold might be here claim for a zero dollars they sold my claim against my attorneys they took one hundred and fifty thousand dollars out of my trust account which i sued them because it wasn't authorized which forced me into the bankruptcy in the st place because there never was a loan there never was a loan to me they forced me into bankruptcy through because my attorneys were suspended in san jose and they can they colluded with trysts ynys attorneys to tell me that i was not liable for the settlement and and so that's how they got me into be better than me you're in chapter eleven and what the judge did was he converted you to chapter seven and put a truck at the end what you were you thought this was your position since you thought you had the ability irrespective of what happened to the entity to reorganize yourself under chapter eleven and successfully do something that you didn't get accomplished through that through the liquidation of your day the entry of a discharge that was a nothing to be hit or mold if you look at the docket number enough and i have that for you they sold it for zero dollars and i spent twelve thousand dollars on my pillow briefs too to take that case on in i would have won that case because the other council never showed the other party never showed up i would want on a diesel so when that another party doesn't show up to a hearing to a trial you win on a d for them to take my counsel away they harmed me in all my other assets i had a claim against farmers insurance for twenty five million dollars and the judge in that case was defense counsel for farmers insurance and sixteen i believe and i actually have the docket numbers i wrote down but i just got a little bit frustrated with this with this theory and i have the halls for you so if you read that cased they sold that the be home for zero and i don't know that i need all of my time because i think that the focus really is on the reasons that were in front of judge easily at the near the end of the hearing on august  d included the insurance issue which was originally raised by the united states trustee but then an amazing trivial but the failure to deliver the key to the alternative to the sarasota ball so that a creditor with a very large claim could utilize the discovery tools in the bankruptcy or to inspect the thomas i get the whole situation that was going on with the energy and the inability of the court of the united states trust the creditors to feel like they were getting the information they needed with regard to the joined in by beach at that hearing to instead not appoint a chapter eleven trustee but convert the case to chapter seven i didn't see anything in the rack and they gave any notice to m thomas that there was some pending potential appointment in his case individually or that there was a trustee being considered under chapter seven before the judge made it this is i believe you're or their theory that you know there was a due process notice an opportunity to defend against the the decision the judge was about to make was present here in this case well that is correct but i believe the core and its experience and i put this in my my brief really had good reason to do what he did because you know the lack of insurance by a so probably not an issue even the lack of delivering that he has something that secure in of all may not be the issue but you have a situation where there's no disclosure of the purchase price no disclosure of diana died under the true purchaser no due diligence by mr thomas to find out whether or not this was a real legitimate buyer  with two hundred million dollars to quote a transaction the judge basically said mr thomas i think you're being scammed i've got a one hundred percent but that affects the decision with regard to what you're going to do with the emerald who's going to control this position how does any of the facts suggest that his case to the individual chapter eleven he and his wife are involved in that that case should be converted based upon those particular facts or those particular issues how do those two fall together i think from a from a bankruptcy you know practitioners perspective this is the general reason why we're all in this business is because the court is trying to protect the rights of creditors and the beach papers that were filed basically said we don't based upon everything that has happened today we don't have any confidence that mr thomas is acting in the best interest of us as the creditors because of the equation of the information related to this purchase agreement and merely the statement he sa well i can't disclose any of this because my family would be in danger but don't you stop all of that when you appoint a chapter eleven trustee or chapter seven trust the in the entity case because then that entity that particular  us but in the meantime we have a final order that you know we've been there all along the trustees properly acted in connection with that order the multiple actions that have been taking in all of although i can't speak for creditors based upon my knowledge of the history of the case there would be an immediate motion to convert the case back to chapter seven  has to be effective the reversal of the conversion order on the other orders that were entered by the bankruptcy court while the chapter seven for the last five years or six years has proceed think well obviously that's the unintended consequences of this kind of fact that are in but frankly have never had that question and i know that it's either section three hundred and forty nine or fifty i can't remember which that talks about whether or not orders remain in effect after certain events have happened and the court can fashion order to allow things to remain in effect and not sort of can tell you that the emerald in question was sold after notice in a hearing in front of judge crater in the in the  action that he's talking about i will go back and look at the schedules but the cause of action against his attorney that was in the co i'm sorry i don't remember i hope i could find it but i don't want to take the court time to do that i mean i don't know how we unwind this charge but you know whether that's even possible with the you can go in for a check back in for chapter eleven now having him already your question to me is what prejudice did mr thomas suffer as a result of the conversion correct to from eleven to seven what it did in your view and in your view and his in case what happened in his case that that was prejudicial  i'm sorry i didn't hear the question he was allowed to keep his income as a result of the conversion he wasn't required to submit to the payment of yes that's correct because you know i can't remember which amendment to the first place and changed the ruling on that but if you're both petition income is subject to consideration in your chapter eleven plan confirmation process which he or she believes support the conversion quick thing your honor please there was no hearing scheduled on the docket for the conversion from chapter seven which takes away my constitutional rights it wasn't scheduled until twenty days later and i didn't get to put in a reply brief that takes