MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
paragraph fourteen of the agree paragraph fourteen is the paragraph that provides that if the property is not developed within five years of the annexation that the city has the right city months where if you could be disconnected properly up until that point it is your any time or any event prior to that day it would extinguish you right to disconnect the property probability that particular paragraph nine and fourteen came into play which limited further in the city actually encounter edition is intended to take the action the city review various proposals for the development of the property you see accepting because there isn't anything in agreement anywhere that says that if the expenditures that were made which were substantially over fifty thousand the testimony was that it was the majority of the cost for creating the final playoff subdivision and i want to point out you know this is not a building permit case twenty houses were going to be built out there but there is not we were not interested in building permits we were going for it to get a piece of paper to take the reporter's office to the the improvements the roads had other public improvements not the homes i believe there was four hundred forty thousand dollars so we believe that  the figure there it should be compared with who for which we don't believe that this the most appropriate figure that still a substantial amount was wh
thousand people that a fundamental rate is infringed with respect to him as a lot he hasn't done so from the circuit course and the supreme court says that there's a reason for that because you can't address it with mathematical certainty it can't be done if i used too much as two years to
all right thanks for tuning into bluebirds denver television denver's own blues jazz funk and soul television program featuring the best local music we gets into an accident people from around the world to but we like to focus on local music first and foremost and today we've got some welcoming james i want to thank everybody for tuning into blue roots denver timbers on blues jazz funk and soul a television show featuring denver's best local music we do some touring acts and people from around the world but like to focus on denver no we moved my family moved here ten years ago from new orleans on ok eleven years and i grew up an hour outside of new orleans oh wow yeah trying to get some high ground i see i love new orleans i would live there if i could breathe humidity it's too strong for me it's really awesome down there a lot of great music of course which inspired music and i share what were some maybe early music experiences where there are people in your family that saying are played music and what where maybe some early experiences for you it that inspired you to be a singer musician well actually my parents were in a band together when i was a kid and i remember them having their their band come over a practice and i remember sitting in trying to play the drums never was able to play those but yeah a lot of fun grew up singing and playing with them my mom still sings gospel regularly and my father plays in a bluegrass band and we played actually bluegrass together for a while have played all different kinds of music over the years and in college played in a band with him and some old time country and then moved down to new orleans and got serious love for jazz and blues down there and  then i wonder you know i'd ask you it's kind of generic that i'd ask you the same kind of question you know how did you come to music as a younger person oh my parents could be a banjo or guitar lessons and i picked the guitar good players all yeah really sounding great well you know i don't want to talk too much but i wanted to stop and talk to guys a little bit so i'm going to let you play out the rest of the show and i'll be talking to you soon thank you so much and thank you so much we're going to take you to a little bit more deep south some of the delta blues i absolutely love having grown up in mississippi we're going to do a little  right so as i said a little while ago moved here from new orleans ten years ago so this song and have any of you've ever been to new orleans before either this song is for you all of you who  the old day much anybody who's ever been homeless i'm going to ask my friend bill plante you really are here to do one called bourbon street parade  nancy we're going to do a little one from taj mahal called cake walk into town for any of you have ever felt really blue and then you felt better and you felt like you could just walk into town this is
that even in her performance evaluation where she had a ninety eight it seemed that they were critical of her management style said true there comments seem to get louder and stronger after she made this complaint she gave me back to pat my wife that was saying you know management skills are bad somebody said that we had to have a meeting people were threatening to quit circumstantial evidence supporting a genuine issue of material fact and and carry it you have to concede that despite the fact that there may have been a statement or two that she heard management style  judge used the wrong timing for the reporting you seem to indicate that her reporting to the hotline that protected it activity was merely one factual finding made by the court would you agree that prior to this separation agreement that under the law she was making calls to the kinds of the burden of proof in your brief talks about it's her burden to prove that the that there was no causal connection really at this stage are we into have motivation which is obviously a very nebulous issue that has to be proven i mean you we look at the circumstances and join them together to see whether in our motivation has been proven so i think it's fair for you to say that she just kept saying in a deposition as michael leave because that's all it would be when you're trying to tie in with motivation i don't think so thank you very much f
examined her extensively on about the day we did and did you cross examine her about the statement she'd given to the investigating officer we did not cross them pretty extensively on the statement itself so she did she was this is the problem i'm having i don't i don't understand exactly what your issue is is your issue that the record reflects testimony about only three assaults but honestly is that the point and again one last thing on the  the trouble is incorrect based on the standards then they can reverse we just think that the evidence is he could not because it still insists that as i stated earlier she has specifically asked for th impossible for that that's true you know
percent purchased money with the bank loan point seven million dollars on a company with negative cash flow it's a harder twenty days ago i wanted to go is there any evidence either way on that i mean i mean that but that pretty common occurrence a bust in that happens on furniture and automobiles and whatever this happens to be an ongoing business cooperation what's the difference in going in the pan and i think that is questionable in and of itself it also was there any evidence was there evidence that fred was running the business into the ground for the purpose of making it look bad  arguments and let me ask another question about this evaluation of gaffe and i want to turn the question around that i asked mr blood i mean this is a situation where the traffic court basically rejected both experts opinions basically said neither one of these do me any good and it does kind of look like you just picked a number in between without a lot of explanation and it's one thing if if one side says coffee tables with ten dollars other side says it's worth fifty the judge says thirty five  because maybe we all think you have a little knowledge about what a coffee table is worth if this was a very complex evaluation of a corporation so where is the basis for the judge's determination of the value of own fortunately judge roberts did not set that or specifically in the portion of the evaluation what he did say and not to be contrary to your arm but you did not reject each opinion its own apples to oranges comparison to determine a reasonable value to place on gaff you know i mean it's it's their status to go both ways of the judge and i'd like to see the judge didn't think much of either expert's opinion i would that's my point that you don't need to get into the net painful assets in these pacific and more complicated but value if there was an historical earnings then the more approach would have been a  and i would ask it this way what judge roberts did was he placed a value on gas unaccounted for yes burden is on him to account for where i mean it and we have this issue of him paying a hundred and sixty thousand dollars for a house for his now ex wife it first question is
assets so again the first issue presented is this question of that option and if james actually signed the option what is the price he is required to pay the trust agreement the point that lebanon is in the making here today is the the the option that's in the trust is essentially offer from the trust outstanding to james which he can either accept or not but when he accepted that offer binding contract was formed between him and the trucks and we ask that they do you know this court recognize that and hold james to his agreement to buy the of the map in this regard it's important to recognize that at the time it james exercised this option the only possible means available to set the price there was no federal tax return and everybody of the record shows understood that there was never going to be a tax return because the value of the whole of the state was roughly three million dollars and you didn't have to file federal return ere was a general argument that hey this was just a continuation of these negotiations with linda trying to reach an agreement on some price you know so we could resolve this but it  doesn't have any sense if he's trying to work out an agreement with linda why does he accept an offer by the trust he was going out of the land with only a trust not met and that's where the connection was be shared duties as trustee to make sure that the terms of the trust are here too so my question is was he making that decision to use the federal state tax return which is going to be lower than the three appraisal hire you because we know right the first choice that listed is the option of the values in the federal state tax return if the political morality that you believe that the words if political means that if there is a federal state actually true that is the thing that is the price of the option and the reader need not move on to the other alternatives i think that's what the circuit court found i think that's a very reasonable commonsense interpretation of the second option is the he made the decision to initially go down the route of the three appraisal routes as they couldn't reach an agreement on the price and then he changed and made a decision to file federal state tax return which he had the trustee the the decision to make then that he would use that as the value for the purpose of the option the federal estate tax valuation was that he did eventually or as it's that he intends on using the value of this appraisal to determine the purchase price i think the fair reading of this notice is that he's saying i'm pretty sure it's going to the federal state tax return that's go decision in this case that twenty three to attach treatment was really not an option it was not practical you know right now my file is a sixty five years old you know the election would require him make clear that the only person that good example the outstanding offer from the trough is a jim individual it could have been a trustee does not give him absolute power to do whatever he wanted to slowly then hit him so he could make past elections like in this case when his main it's it's it's impro logically it's clear what happened here
like a job for superman or you mean to say that if the iceberg permitted to fall there's a possibility the monster might still be alive bang you know provides us with the most was a new angle on my bros once the story get over to the museum and see what's going this looks like a job for superman and and friend and you're wonderful you're pretty wonderful yourself oh how did you get here t they meant that rightfully belongs to my people possibly but just what do you expect us to do about you have a newspaper published the truth of the island vacated immediately it's fantastic why that's ridiculous i've never heard anything so absurd you know from the look in his eyes i don't most believe he was an artist no he's just a harmless  you wouldn't want to miss this story i'm sure it's like a job for superman for three hundred years this mighty bonking to lay dormant a new and more beautiful city sprang up at its base but now after centuries of an activity a slight tremors are being felt at the bureau  scientists watch for the czech delicate instruments to determine the seriousness of this renewed activity i want you to send me some real stories now here are your steamship tickets and here are your press passes you'll need these down there goodbye good luck and for pete's sake see if you two can work together por and it's really a great story in this country i know who six months they thought i was one of them this very case contains a list of their names together with their diabolical plan to destruction they will stop at nothing to recover these
and at the end of the day the damage to the heat so we have a whole series of people who have different understood and places and then the question of whether those places the statistics made any difference to them in terms of so you could see that people read understood that a lot of people did not see on so the question what is needed you can say to them if they had known that it was different  the law is very clear that is regarding class certification rest within the sound discretion of the trial and the standard of review in this court in these people testified that they were actually paid eight balls based upon the number of students they were able to roll in the medical system everything you're talking about took place before the first day of class and whether you're successful or not is not depend on whether they completed the class and got a job or didn't completed and didn't get a job so i ask you posing council if somebody is is subject to these violations but still takes the course bill graduates still gets a job are they a member of your class or are in the are entitled to have their tuition refund they are a member of the class and they were victims of this of the scare tory violation or whatever it is and how no class so many students and they were able to fight were required to specifically go over this and deviate from there are strict procedures written documents protocol that apply to each every class member universally in this case so we would
and letting the judge value weigh the credibility of the that witness himself now that does raise some issues in terms of the fairness but those seem to have been resolved long before this constitute probable cause even if we assume that john no is truthful now i did cite to an article by a professor the merits of confidential informants and there are various ways that the john doe but provide best substantiation for the material he the police officer who was also named before the issuing judge so the the truthfulness of there is not sufficient evidence to constitute practical purposes swallow up the exclusionary rule and the good faith rule would have which would not be left with anything other than the out of the loaf of terminal receding support our position is very straightforward your honor and all the critters in my remarks there was clear probable cause here if you want me to go through the facts briefly i will be terribly redundant with my  highlight the fine was that this is the dress twice within the last thirty days including within the last seventy two hours he saw bags of powder he knew to be cocaine he said on or about the defendant he also had seen a powder cocaine on it's theoretically possible but what he saw him distributing was something other than cocaine we're talking probable cause here i mean i'm arguing that you can not prove beyond reasonable doubt we're just talking probable cause for the a fine he under all the times maybe approximately twenty or fifteen to twenty or even fifteen to twenty five gives us an idea that is there are a lot but now we have maybe one i i strongly and people to see me your one of my colleagues out when i was dealing with the search warrants and i say if you want to do it yourself would you like to come to court and defend your work then rather than leave that to me and yes time i think i think better procedure i'm i'm i'm assuming that it's only an assumption on my part but it was not pr
us that on your arm anybody know that spy has lost its dignity and glamour today they get ordinary common themes gangsters i wish there was something i could do about it and if you boys might say i'll give you the lowdown plans have been stolen and  look every plane made two but i don't know where they could  course not and i won't bother you if we look at ship over again on the contrary i very much appreciate your interest in my enterprise which one of you is danny grant i am what seems to be the problem downie b o t a as little calling on him at seven in the morning to put on
with that for just a little what's this going to come in handy let's go hey i'm out of there you must be a new member of the ga me one thing i'll do all the talking to you too who down here right ahead i'll wait in there
i really happy to welcome all of you tonight the bicentennial committee has been working on a series of concerts in celebration of the two hundredth birthday of the bicentennial of the brown church this is our second concert the hip replacements the one that we're really looking forward to i think it's going to be a lot of fun and i want to thank you for coming out tonight it's a cold night and just say a couple of words about the preservation trust sponsorship we are an organization that is historic preservation nonprofit organization and the very first project done by paul broun our executive director was the rehabilitation of the round church for that reason sponsoring this concert means an awful lot to us as an organization paul broun was not able to be here tonight but he did ask me to please send us warm regards he always thinks of richmond as such a very special place because of the people the round church so just want to thank you again tonight spanned the hip replacements is going to be a very special treat to look forward to having a little time for some great music some of you may remember  was here for a number of pierce and richmond the band comes from bristol stark's pearl and east middlebury and have a very unique style of music that we're going to enjoy each month between now and the grand celebration bicentennial which is in august we're going to have concerts like this i am fight you to come back and join us in this year long celebration with that let me introduce the hip replacement such a pleasure to be in this hall this renovated form i remember it was a basketball court in the acoustics were so unbearable that you couldn't hardly carry on a conversation with someone next to you and here it is to get invited to our household where there is a musician's who are going into schools working which and with the youngest children doing music shoes and more their preschool children have an incredible sense of i just want i just want to remind ourselves as group two hundred celebration for a building that we all know needs a little work now and then it's when people come out and celebrate the community and on in the community spaces they have that you
employee katz was a part of the time of the injury was working for peoria district one fifty the employee was injured metal scaffolding collapsed on the employee this case was i would quit in front of arbitrator mathis on march twenty first of two thousand and twelve at the commission should have relied on the evidence however if you look at the commission decision commissions say it's petitioner employee was at the point of maximum medical improvement as of may thirty first of two thousand and thirteen the only doctor that actually specified that this condition and those were related to the treatment i related to the sentence of the employee had after he was involved in a wreck related accident doctor giving his medical records clearly noted to the employee prior to this accident had no prior are there are two doctors the i'm a doctor dr downer and research dr hauser never said that either the employee should not be restricted or if he would have been restricted that would be related to his rejected this condition so i believe there was and just to clarify are in red as compensation permanent impairment is different than restrictions though anderson does say that that he has no impairment he did say that you can go back to work full duty nobody jobs but he couldn't find one and for that reason he under section eight he is entitled to maintain its benefits that teaching about the interstate scaffolding case we do think that is a logical extension and the reason we think it's a logical d benefits if you look at it if you read a specific lee commission states that well he even though from march thirty first it says and i live in the employer had our the employee had respected duty but the because the employer never accommodated in that respect a duty he would still be entitled to t v benefits up to the date that he wished and i my so even if you find you know if you extend commission law to care that budgeted school district who has to keep the rooms clean have to keep positions filled and sometimes these people come back and they're put back on the list it happens at this gentleman you know there are sometimes union issues that wasn't brought out in this case but  distractions the employer has to do their mama did them all are the employer has to well you know find a vocational concerts evolve them so they can go ahead and find another job in this case if