MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
begin with the champagne student patrol around one fifty eight am on may one two thousand and nine student patrol officer laid down a relating firsthand information personal observation it would be irresponsible for the police ignore such information these folks are more dangerous than someone with a gun and this is the testimony from officer park record page fifteen so there's nobody in within the crosswalk but then the police officer testified that if they hadn't stopped he would have hit them i thought that was  he's turning right well i don't i don't think the police officer determines whether it was a violation of law or the trial court makes their determination that would be a conclusion or apparently officers and of course it's again over review is for this court to determine that but the police officer talked there he had violated this statute i believe the lose because that's really all the state news well i think it would have to be reasonable on it and if there's nobody within a crosswalk when he's trying to  now like it just as pope said there was testimony by the police officer who not only was where the students forced to stop but also that they had began crossing into the cross walk before have a right to go first and here they clearly clearly the defendant want to go first and again this will settle the traffic stop supported by probable cause to believe that the defendant is violating traffic  as valid regardless of whether the officer for a purpose is discovered evidence of a crime and this analysis is properly conducted from the perspective of a reasonable officer at the moment in time and not in hindsight so saying that it even was as for the student patrol officer again this there was testimony that the police officer treated that way a citizen complain it would be at least as reliable if not more reliable than a person on the highway calling from their think the reason in this student patrol officer that content with you in the testimony is to show a reason for following the defendant in the first place as if you got a reliable tip from troll officer that somebody might be intoxicated and six or eight blocks that sounds like a lot but that's that's still less than less than a mile so when you think about it in terms of that it's not too far to follow someone especially
by the the time
policy choice now in a case where there is a interpersonal and real world of greater than fifteen thousand dollars that there's never have the state has a right to the many a barrel fifteen thousand dollars under the exemption and that's  not apply to that
all right all right kid to see everybody nice night tonight nice and it's not hot as you know what like it's been sometimes when i thin air this is so comfortable  i don't know what you're saying to me say i want to be and also the little kids there's a little kid's cademy daycare center to pella road flower and for the beautiful sun that we lost a few years ago i was next door neighbors with these people very sweet people and big he was a really good friend of mine anyway i'm going to do a song that i always on my cd and i remember when i first played it for nikki he was like yeah that's good cheryl but i like what he did at the end better so i'm going to try to improvise a little bit more on this song for you nikki right now funny story it's a funny so you know kids academy thank you so much and i guess i do have c d s for sale i have a mailing list please come sign up on it thanks thanks so much
time it took it would take for his mother to call him on a cell phone when they crossed past when they're both going to the bathroom now being a little technical myself i know some people might have trouble making a cell phone sessions well he just needed a little more tiring to come around should be able to open up something that the evidence also clearly shows is very difficult for anyone to do so this is being we don't know what standard i think the a group or in reticence in front of the groupies ages his mental capacity because there's no indication in this record that it can't repeat brown so what is now not coming prepared for the sessions and sessions as of june two thousand and eight which was the same month that the supervision dish was filed shows that this particular individual was capable of participating and that he was not given enough time and that the trial  was a told that he needed to attend group sessions well if you will he only had a few months to go so he was participating fully those one on one sessions there was no complaints about of participation at the would be domestic violence because many orders of protection saying you shall not have contact with others are much more specific you shall not be in the presence of did look there to find it in the town in terms of again were at this particular level understanding the letter please go forward with this john is taking medication for these disorders and you know he's already these are going to be again my recollection
there's a fair standard or there's a clear rule we will get x when the court review says we need to look at six me points to determine whether this was appropriate sanction  stuff i agree with your previous statement that you have to look at what both sides did or did or do not do you dispute that oversized representation that your client dissipate discovery orders in ten of twelve case management conferences an hour so it's not like everybody got a laugh but he was a minute late people waited they did and everybody left still not knowing why he didn't feel right and you know i think the record shows that you know really did try to make contact with there there were reasons for that the there was only you know
clearly there was enough evidence here material to the issue and that it was discovered after trial and could not have been discovered with due diligence before reason given before now as to god like bush i'm sure he's very of the mixture was female d n a and that's why she went ahead and did those by s t r switching which tests only the male fraction and so there's nothing at three eleven east down the street on the day that the vendor was back was arrested for possession of the weapon and the fact that he may have had a weapon some months after that was also a thirty eight that's not relevant to anything either it in there why s t r testing that she did that has a smaller database but she testified this was recognized by the scientific community and this statistics developed into this determine whether any rational jury on this evidence could convict him with in this case using that standard the defendant was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt  bent over he says he demonstrates important how he was been slightly older and was manipulating something on the ground he couldn't see what it was but he knew he was manipulating something on the ground so when there is that the fact that the defendant is he seeing me doing something on the ground and in that period that where he was doing the making the manipulation they find the gun in the back the trickery and the handle which said that the defendant could not be excluded from him having touched the gun which is some indication of
you're a public employee is liable for failure to establish a police department or otherwise provide police protection or service he have police protection services provided for failure to provide adequate police protection or service failure to prevent the commission of crimes county or to detect or solve a crime or failure to identify or after him criminal have the luxury of just doing anything you want there are limits to that in those moments put you on the same level as an individual would be and so my question you know when you talk about a highly skilled canine elements but then you've got an affirmative defense we don't have a stand to preserve as their dogs get immunity we do have a statute that says if you oppose providing a police question of fact for the trial right to the jury or right but i could also vision other applications other than search and rescue and you mentioned the horses i know that horses in dogs are used for crowd control in lots of situations and that would be another very significant impact if we help them and bringing and getting results and how is the injury occurred because you still have to  performing things not ownership people own a car but these are talking about services so it doesn't really matter whether it's being done by the harbor of tours as long as it's within the umbrella  control we've clearly said there's no back or emission necessary on the part of the owner for life realty to attack so then the question becomes what's a service is an actor the mission on the part of the trouble having trouble because you are stuck on a ship which is the on the control right but in a leading situation
the following report to the royal geological society by the undersigned alexander sexton is a true and faithful account of events that befell the society's expedition in manchuria as the leader of the expedition i must accept responsibility for its ending in disaster but i will leave to the judgment of the hon members the decision as to where  it is but i demand an explanation that is no place me what do you have in that nothing that would interest i think that in the fifteenth century king henry betrayed us to the russians i hope that you and your husband except by the farm she's really afraid fortunately he was interrupted yes  i don't want to panic the passengers what is it i'm sorry i can't of course i beg your pardon was somebody else that could have solved many of the little science if the theory of evolution is confirmed if the science of biology is revolutionized if the very origin of man is determined i have heard t can you tell me how he died that woman was killed the engineer you know the chess player you told me that she was an international spy yes i know or you do well with that theory about this i'm only a policeman as i don't have much education but i make it simple supposing that creature one you kill it was capable of taking idea directly from other people's brains and transferring to its own you mean it sucked other people's brains absorb through the eyes that was our first clue the ice going white then a piece today so your brains all of your education would have gone into its brain it would have been as is you nonsense there's a scientific explanation  see i don't know he's you get back that i a there's nothing in your head of any use the train will be here in exactly fourteen minutes forty minutes b s yeah that's what it says here even though i still believe in god i don't like to read a full up no your  i would have to act little father was one of my teachers he was like a father to me but why would a man like you of years of good something some form of intelligence came to the earth from another planet the atmosphere the earth was new to it different but it learned how to survive oh by entering into the no in someone on this train you're a very good detective you have discovered everything except always now the host and that's our next thought this might come in handy but you must have seen something i told you i was asleep he knew about the when we did the test the lights were on the high temperatures what happens to countess i'm an american and i'm not accustomed to being bullied by foreigners batman he's the one who wouldn't let us get off the train he's  i'm a police inspector everybody's under arrest including you who are the killers who but troublemakers he was trying to protect you well she's mad the even in front of the compan why do you come from another i came with others like myself i was left behind an accident i survived and protozoans fish vertebrates beast if your planet  part of me
as a third party complaining and then subsequently as a standalone complaint that was consolidated with a suit in which i ran insurance company sued your transportation for an unpaid coverage is improper and was there is an actual reason for parents male that you know if he's not if he's not there is no duty to go around and file anticipatory suits saying that i did not receive the proper liberty mutual is there any company that writes insurance policy that excludes independent contractors in the trucking industry would contend that the person is not an independent contractor good steady and good name of the company and the drug and their uniform and all these things and they always try to tie it up so they usually refuse to premiums the payment agency had nothing to do with the audit number one and number two the recalculation of those premiums
right on the concept running through a number of these cases in in that area probation revocation everything excuse me i'm revocation that to make sure there's just not permanent eternal vigilance squiggle or someone's actions what what's your what's your response to in that case the u s supreme court specifically addressed the issue about whether or not under the federal statute proved by clear and convincing evidence is sufficient and said we're not going to decide that but i think it's an open i think based on the standard applicable to mental health proceedings generally in fact the court in's and out's based its ruling on the standard applicable and civil mental health of the citizens generally and it's worth looking at heard here we can't look to the criminal law for what the standard is in recovery proceedings after all because there's no such thing i'd also point out that on initial commitment and basis is on proof beyond a to reasonable doubt in the past and we're hoping now much more about about treatment which is the distinction that the u s supreme court made in not adding to just one of the mental health cases cited by stage of proceedings but this one it doesn't say what about these particular distinctions that he drives makes a different look wired by the constitution at recovery proceedings point out that in both the hundreds and graeme construed the kansas sexually violent predator act and that that actually applied to both people who had been convicted and people who had not been convicted of the i
examination that nothing happened on july nineteenth two thousand and seven would offer mr jackson's condition for his course or requiring him to have given replacements that he would not have otherwise  and doctors script would ensure that mel that typically surgical intervention doesn't happen before the patient becomes aware of the condition but both of them disagreed and again
to me services where a senior services company here in belmont hit it right on the line or street behind a chocolate dream which is a really dangerous place to work because if you're having a tough day you tend to be a lot of dark chocolate way tomorrow night there's a bit of a concert here with a joke but it's a rainy day back up from earlier in the season so if you've got nothing to do to borrow the weather supposed to be good to get cut out for that one and if you've got nothing to do on saturday night and  well we want to thank you so much for coming out with us tonight we're going to do one more song for you before it gets too dark here we want to thank you very much always best here check out over here and over here thank you for sponsoring us tonight being here with us we think o
certification is for felony in this case even then into his mental illness i would suggest it really on the record it's hard not to have some doubt about the defendant's mental fitness in this case and even assuming none of the procedural requirements that are required of certain procedural requirements involved in filling out a successful first stage post in your surviving first stage postcondition petition in the legislature and then the supreme court has never certification
two thousand and eight it's important to look at the fact that
d would we at that point are you asking a son the egg battery to reinstate that police to later separate from the nine one one appeal of saying that it makes no sense to label someone who the defendant dated fifteen years ago as a family or house number but let me ask you this question with respect to constitutionality forget about that the most are battery stared for a second if the legislature created a new class two felony called aggravated battery of a former dating impertinent same elements as aggravated battery but a more serious pound b because the victim is someone with whom the defendant once feared a dating s don't we see situations though we're dating per nurse her risk for abuse while the relationship is intact certainly but doesn't it often increase when the relationship bones grow up there is a period too close to the term nation relationship where there is an increase in violence however shown in the briefest of studies that we've provided this court it's kind of like a downhill slope further in time to get away from the determination relationship
regards to the average weekly wage our starting point obviously it's as section ten where overtime is excluded from the average weekly wage calculation since overtime is not defined this court has refined over time and that's defined as compensation for any hours beyond those that the claimant regularly works and extra pay above normal hourly wage and so this that leave you that leaves us here with a matter of proof because he not only had the conflicting testimonial evidence from the parties there was no independent witness it was you know part of this was you had documentar situations where you know because labor laws require you to pay overtime in certain situations i think the court has has carved out certain exceptions so that if something technically fits into overtime it could becomes is there evidence in the record that some of the over time he worries because he requested it i think was the first morning was he didn't object to or people over time and that he was required to work will be hours that were is a collective bargaining agreement a collective bargaining agreement that sets the conditions of his employment and in that collective bargaining agreement you cannot buy him anything saying that he's required to work overtime now  condition i want to address and the things that the commission said about the collective bargaining agreement and one thing i would like to point out is that on the collective bargain getting agreement as a contract you are not required i do not believe to follow what the co mandatory i'm also with regards to the collective bargaining agreement on income bites that in the overtime section that he has been doing we guarantee eight hours so that means commission said this that that part of the bargain and grim word said the union reserves the right to file a grievance against any employer who insists consistently insist that employees work more than ten hours in one day in one day so that's a quote from the bargaining agreement the commission said that that meant the employer could require the employee to work more than eight hours but could not require him to work more than ten hours  you can't determine exactly which days the employee work which there were two weeks that were not full weeks that you count all of the weeks that they worked and if we gave you the cases where they all regular time onwards five hundred and seventy one point eighty three hours that believe and he divided it by eight to determine how many days he'd work and handbook where it says that that employees may be asked and pointed out that the employer could have stated all hours beyond their voluntary and that they would construe this against
the officers termed a hand to hand exchange of they couldn't see anything that was exchanged and then reenter their cars and be sunday afternoon the officers train that which taught the officers that this this conduct was consistent with  who's the officer now for our david detailed description of what a typical narcotics transaction at it corner looked like and was able to describe what he saw th is was not a stakeout it absolutely is it absolutely  suspicion it's not probable cause standard simply has to be something that's more than a mere hunch and we have here is two officers as was previously stated really out of control when they were suspicious activity there's a pontiac that was already pulled into the gas station  his back that passenger as he was pulling away with our lights on and when he didn't stop one of the officers the driver actually had to get out of the car and yelling hey stop and there's several of you mention that's suspicious if you don't stop when someone is trying to you see things that officer left on testify that as part of his training in the drug unit it was extremely consistent with a hand to hand transactions it's actually it's referred to as a hand to hand transaction entire conduct is something that is very similar to reason to suspect criminal activity other than the imam what these top priority what they saw they had no reason to suspect that there was any criminal activity if my director was not hiring mary there was no information from an transaction taken the words out of the transcript that's enough you don't need a high crime area you don't need specialized for stakeout that you're looking for this defendant or in this area you don't need any  cars and don't say anything next it but i mean my point is that's all you got and you're telling us that when you see a transaction like that short duration where something is is exchanged  i'll give you the additional factor that the police couldn't tell that it was something else couldn't tell it was keyes couldn't tell it was you know six pack of beer mr you're telling us that that's enough i think that combined with the yell stop he stopped and then that shows that he wasn't trying to escape it and there is no reason for the office to believe he was trying to escape so in whether or whether it was because he didn't see it whether it
for and the court also informed the respondent well you know if you wait cancel your been held to the same standards and the court also explained to the respond that this is the way it will happen you will have a chance to ask questions after after in the testimony and you will be permitted to make a statement or testify on your own and so that the then respond understood what the proceeding was going to be like in th t there the way that he represented himself also shows that he understood the nature of seeking out there was a lot of what we would see as a rational statements that when on but harm other people in the in getting anything in the said that he wanted to put it would be back in his own custody so he he knew what the point in that proceeding was he knew what he had written to show that he's not a danger to himself or others and he knew they had a burden to somehow show that he could take care of themselves are so i mean despite all of the other irrational things that conscious of what's going on proceedings so i mean if the heat the court is simply trying to well there's very simple in his presentation in contrast to is really your inabilities to control without body that is outside just the three questions that he asked before and when he said i may have to reconsider you know just you know he's trying to draw a line straight you know looking at it that if the record as a whole in the court's language as a whole it appears the court made a finding that he had cassidy but reserve the right to reconsider that if you know this particular respond knowledge of the consequences of the hearing if you think there has to be a showing of prejudice and no i don't think so because this is a waiver you know and also you know the thing would say wow i would be committed
because this was you know jury is entitled to be instructed on a lesser included offense when there is evidence at trial that would support a conviction on that offense and there just was not a