think that the court focused and that set the court to say the evidence shows like very convincing evidence that in the stall the guns at least at the time with the intent of fighting it out with law enforcement if you were part of his statement was i'm going to go ramble the fact of the case a pretty specific after mr jefferson wakes up from his method induced stupor he takes the guns puts them in his car he takes other items from the first range and then drives to a second ranch where he knows the ranch and take you're not going to argue he's going to go rescue prisoners from vietnam i'm not going to be  from the front to the car to the back seat of the to the trunk of the car and at the same time he's call that another friend a mutual friend of mr hackers and mr thompson's to come get him indicating he's leaving the car at that ranch with the guns wolf district of montana i'd like to make a threshold legal point about this guideline and how it's changed and then i'll go to the record on on go rambo first of all this particular guideline was amended effect of two thousand and six and under the and then that the burglary alone is enough and would clearly qualify we can't use the two thousand and six guidelines because this court held last fall of the united states for stevens amended the circuits were it was three three and the night circuit never weighed in on whether burglary would be enough standing alone the commission cited with the three services that there was so challenge existing circuit law but you could have said and i suppose the circuit law does precluded that's why we're not arguing then you would really clearly not a circuit lot does preclude so to make it all turn on the verb was this is not fair to infer from any perhaps like least i thought the district could have done so is that whatever may have been his present became paranoid law enforcement were after him and of course the coke way anyone would heat an additional two to three grams of methamphetamine so then he goes into this house and the question is why is he taking the firearms and all i'm trying to say your hon perhaps that's why it took them took the firearms there's no evidence that says he took them because you want to sell them and make money let me also it was clearly come of this to firearms i'm like television sets are easy to carry because they have great value they can be s to law enforcement a couple days later he says jamieson told me he was going to shoot it out with law enforcement yeah but he  and whether that is how he interpreted go ramble but it's pretty significant that the guy who's standing there talking to mr hacker do you remember him specifically saying that and serino i don't remember him saying i don't remember i don't believe no i don't believe so from my statement here i just don't read them i don't believe you said that from my statement here i just don't remember him  then you think you would win strongly on that basis i do ok and but what happens when you add the rambo statement which indicates that he said at some point when he had the guns because he was clearly referring to the guns i think that he was going around i don't know what rambo would have notwithstanding the notion that if we're really being literal to the movie the fact is that it was in lot of possibilities of him fact some time between the time he took the guns of time that he made the statement those one point in time when he's saying i've got these guns with me and if they corner me i'm going to turn around and take as many of guns and they say you know come up with your hand you know sort of a hug situation or a cool hand luke situation i've come up with you hands up and you say i've got doesn't really make a lot of sense if i take if i burglarized house because i plan to shoot it out with the police and then i and i have i have that ongoing present intent there's no doubt about it but i happen to be picked up at the shopping market while i'm going to buy provisions and what i'm about to take off into the hills you're saying that that wouldn't be a crime because the police didn't know at the guideline does not require the actual commission of another felony you know i do agree it doesn't require the commission but you have to have for a felony to exist there and there are going to tie loss folders there are certain elements to each crime and he has