when you talk about it being no adequate remedy it seems to me which are actually saying is you could not maintain successfully a cost of action against hundred percent of your damages from the one you can sue that to me would be a law that would provide an adequate when he even though it provided you with no ability to sue one of the parties why is this different or this is the american court would ever upset the regulatory scheme japan to see so i put in place by saying that notwithstanding that long trip and you can sue one of the contractors if for seven reason that you could not be served and you could not adequately serve people in japan now might be a different matter but you can get america correct it wouldn't apply here the japanese is on this case they haven't expressed it the rye would it conceivably be what you are advocating it would be well i don't know over the fact that our experts tell us that need comprehensive remedial scheme and happened in their home countries that unquestionably provide remedies for the types of injuries that they allege but nonetheless restrict them from filing claims of recovering damages from specific not apply outside to suit quite outside japan so there are about a half a dozen reasons why those arguments don't make sense on st of all but really the evidentiary problems with those submissions that we noted just on their face the argument doesn't make sense as to ride to pay and would not run the channeling brought to reply in courts outside of japan that would create an incentive for everybody in japan who has a clean pretty clear advantage to could recover st in japan and then they could turn to chords outside of japan to seek additional recovery from other parties the whole purpose of doing media stealing contemplated by compensation act is to do and in essence to civilian nuclear power industry by ensuring access to insurance funds and to protet participants in that industry in the lisa potentially calamitous damages that bush purposes would be completely brief it's incredibly uncommon and one of the few points that they made is that it was incredibly important to the government of japan to try out all things related to the would be binding in the sense that they went to japan and file a lawsuit based on these claims in japan and g e you were to take a different position in that litigation that we've taken and here these are the service jurisdiction if there is a statute of limitations that would apply the alternative for that wouldn't apply in the us and there are a few cases that require this conditions of dismissal that the defendant agreed not to r own live in the us the statute of limitations might be fifteen years why would that to print a jury and to crime down convenience i'm still having some suit and there are centrally trying to have the federal work here in boston in this police the summer decisions of the japanese government about how to resolve these incredibly complex types of nuclear damage cla we recognize that when you have the possibility of a cleaning somewhere covering the alternative form that is sufficient as long as the congress the same types of injuries that you've brought in the united states and this circuit directly on point that was a case where it was a each an accident and the foreign plaintiff from pakistan had entered settlements with pakistani airlines for about three thousand dollars for iraq and that koreans and as a result of that settlement under call the front of the complaint in this court of twelve the statue of limitations i don't know that is in the night to a declaration but that is my understanding from discussions with the japanese lawyers sued in the courts of saudi arabia and pakistan the issue of blood money payments to eight hundred and twenty one of the claimants was a concern raised by the parents the plaintiffs in the case there was no you would just suit papers and do nothing for it which is exactly what we have here i suppose the japanese government said just applied to us we'll pay you one hundred percent of your losses plus a twenty percent kicker to cover other stuff plus personal injury but you can't sue anybody else well your hon