sylvester special reports mr silver streak there are no next item would be audience comments this is the time of the where we permit any member from the audience to get up and speak to a non agenda item for up to five minutes is there anyone in the audience that would like to speak with a with respect to a non agenda item the thing done will move on will move to off that top pick two hundred finished business first item would be the resignation of david vogel from the planning commission to these people just ask if there's an interesting art that sounds like a game plan well we'll see if there's any interest and then i guess we'll decide whether or not we need to interview considering that we've pretty much nay seven zero mr sylvester e next item in a new business would be a request by james t murty in to swap a portion of open space in a lot to ten in the open space for wood in space behind my house from our perspective the land that you want to acquire is land that's already flat in grass beside your driveway and the delay and you want to give the township is over the hill in basically an unmixed unaccessible area the better to be obviously the trees property value but also the ability to expand your i would i understand that i guess i'm just i'm glad to be more than happy to sell it to you personally i don't know that the point it was talked about at that time of having to get the fifty nine watts in the vision i think we had to get eighty percent of them to agree to site off on it but now you're saying you can do it through publication well i understand mr johnson's comments and i believe that the public wouldn't be hurt by giving up that piece of property i just don't know that the public would benefit in any way from gaining the upper part so that's my thought of was a sale that has not gone through yet we did swap in trade in that same subdivision with another property to solve a pool locat the price through them our am would basically be three hundred thousand six seventy five which is within our budget and slightly less than what we're currently paying if we were to go with  commitment how much is that's not the issue but i would be very strongly supportive of smith but it's in my reasons for supporting him or that i have had the opportunity over the edge two years to work a lot with smith i have seen him defender townships i've seen him defend the so it's only was i've seen him defend comprehensive planning in both the commonwealth court as well as the supreme court yeah i thought all four do so and a nice job in each one i thought maybe a different set of qualifications perspective and what have you so i guess i'd have no me i would probably choose stroustrup you can i with a with an opportunity to try to negotiate their fee to something similar to the others but i could i could live without smith but as a it might be something to look at hearing do you want questions now about some of the numbers sure ok the public works number for vehicle maintenance minor equipment but she's me not that when they expenditures at the bottom you have two thousand and thirteen fifty four thousand five hundred with an adjustment of fifty thousand in the revised budget to me it would be don point in time i don't think we're in church i'd be interested in more for in the final hours to take that out it's somewhat unfortunate that when he made example cation people don't recognize that situation but at this particular point in time  decisions which affect peter hughes including been alluded to directors and staff of youth serving agencies probation officers guidance counselors and ministers i think those terms modify the thing that comes first i mean there could be a minister who works for one of these social service agencies that makes decisions affecting you but just in general minister i don't think to would so i don't think there's i mean that's why i read it