rights the code and precedent with regards to both parties and i can probably reading the response from the state agree that october thirteenth two thousand officers so the issue supervisory and the procedure normally when after a person is found not guilty by reason of insanity it's covered by five cash to cash for some small fee on is that it covers the commitments and basically it says a good result but i don't want to harm that and this is the reason why i talk should have that because let's say if someone just had no prior crimes committed or harmed it was found individual and society from this potential dangerousness well the three year period is the period here but he's not going to be treated for three years right now  prison term and twenty years later you know then to second it and start at the end of that twenty years on and the statute seems to have an emphasis on that committee at the current mental state because the state has to prove that they're only mentally ill and section that section also says there has to be a current valuation within thirty days widow  section five the section is silent whether commitment should run concurrently or consecutive with minors so this is the issue whether there's two separate crimes on two separate days you know whether that sense should be currently or know it it should be considered i'm concurrently and not consecutively and also talks of the state's position in your city to take credit provided criminal defendants on before they're charged with a crime they get credit i mean but he's being held well you know that counsel keeps saying well that you know that you've created worse than if you were convicted of a crime well i think you riginal theme case talks about it's happens in orleans the criminal code and all that doesn't apply to the people who are committing you're not convicted you're not really punished you can petition to get out i think any time i'm sure my opponents more knowledgeable than i am about that she says it's every six months but the burden shift after the first time i mean it's the criminal code is written in there as far as good time but after committed period of committed means period of commit it doesn't mean period of they're committed to their receiving treatment i don't i don't know what happened to mr hughes prior to being committed as far as this chester and they have a they have a motion pending i still can't figure it out determine which is not in the record is that he kept getting violated i don't they would release him and he would just sit there and so he violated i guess their version is somehow he was being held on this aggravated battery but the maximum time of commitment to somebody who's been found guilty not guilty by reason of insanity is the period of time he could have been sentenced to if he'd been convicted of the offen right yes mind if he'd been convicted of the offense he would have gotten credit for the time he was held in custody but before you since i think that's true with all due respect i think you have to go i think in the original theme case it talks about i think they brought an equal protection argument some other arguments and you're treating me worse than you would guy that was because of crime in the court and my language is hate this is apples and oranges you know it's not the same with another argument serves well it was their alternative or you know i look at this stuff i call the luck when i call the prison i said none of this stuff makes any sense the parties were given two chances by the trial just to provide research and they couldn't do you can get out she says you can only file are six months i don't dispute that but you can get out you can say i'm restored to sanity i want out now i want an independent examination so it's not the same  because of this pending aggravated battery i don't i don't think that's true at all and i don't think it's  so even if even if judge cook for the sake of argument is correct i don't think the record supports the fact that supposedly this privacy the only reason he said healthy is because of this pending aggravated battery case i don't think that's true at all that's not treated worse than a person who's actually been found guilty what about his argument we don't know why he was held yossi before the date of october thirteenth they may know that this criminal charges pending but i don't understand why you know all the leaves the county say come get this guy and decide what you want to do with it and nobody