which abstention by federal courts as it is appropriate for those circumstances are carefully defined and the main the exception and not the rule now applying those three fronts to this particular case i think the most important thing is looking at the california from its class we are seeking redress for the plaintiffs in forty nine other states have this i'd like to look at the timeline of this case and see what has happened in this case romo's files on feb various other states are under the federal passage of time has been detrimental not only to the point of class but as to mr holmes were presented as well she has passed away and i believe that in this particular case the equities are such that this court should not refrain from exercising jurisdiction affect any ruling in the state for keep in mind state court is never to this day decided that it will exercise jurisdiction over a nationwide class that motion that was has been pending for eighteen months is now pending even even longer and fast times actually making it difficult for plaintiffs to pursue a client some will pass away some will not be able to be located and it is a detriment to the plaintiffs not to be allowed to pursue this in the federal court this violated the laws of kentucky how is that reasonably likely the california supreme court judge it's to refine that kind of nationwide class action it's our position that labor ready operation agreement so how do we know that her claims can be adequately litigated and your action but all in is i'm certainly a member of one of the fugitives classes in the california state court action whether or not she can be a personal representative obscene class which means you have to choose to be a member of that class as you well know well let's let's do the flip side and you know why she's hurt if she's not in your class right why are you hurt by if the if the isn't that if the district court reaches an adverse decision let's say with respect to the class of branch managers that has for clues of a fact over the much broader class in the state court action so so so the state court cannot enforce its weight in our laws with respect to the members of this often class and the district court so in other words if you use the national analogy the state court action is this test and a consolidated district court action count motivations and i think motivation the motivation was before judge her just when he made the ruling to consolidate these actions and in his view he had to paint if you have just this before him and he concluded that it would have been appropriate for these cases to be heard at  i have difficulty seeing and you know obviously if i were in your position i would rather control my own life acacia as well and if they do decide some issues that may somehow affect lives and a geisha i'd rather have that i'd rather have the chance to you know i have enough confidence in myself i'd rather take that shot and let someone else take it back is that that if that's really going on here that seems like it's a problem i think patrols litigation is now what's going on here i think that  overtime that will be if you will have that if you will have to deal with that issue with lucian in some way shape or form when you go back to the state court action and the branch managers whether they be california and the branch managers or tennessee branch population so those numbers that are that are involved in both actions and by the very nature of the keep this to court action assuming it was certified will be a much broader class so there is a possibility you will have people that are participating in both fashions and in the trenches perspective on what is absolutely afraid that if you go ahead i mean it's just about who gets more money is the thing about is just about who gets the opportunity to litigate the issues first or and control the classes i mean what's this about where where  class and i don't particularly like that part of this case but if we look at the doctrines that the trial court relied upon when it made its ruling the main the main policy goals behind younger in there's there's potentially candy which would mean what's the federal court to do that would ruin the state courts ability to make decisions and i think the state court here it's only true  state interest is in applying it's labor laws to california employees and all the other employees in the other states playground offices and other states should be allowed to