about the point so i have to say that the the two sides of that issue are either that noticing was entirely inadequate so we weren't able to articulate any meaningful arguments but that's the fault of the judge what's cameron asked me if we had i hope i understood the question i think i believe the question to be whether we have failed to make arguments sufficiently below so that they too will be addressed by this  create your own movement by taking money and disposing of it so this is all of this is more fully well they were this is a good time to let the other side respond and then you can really use the remainder of the time if amendments to it and the fact this was noticed in reno is that came up for hearing several times we were so concerned about the misuse of these funds somehow or the fact that they might be elected to a purpose other than the completion of this project and we wanted to make certain that the lawyers for the trustee and the other professionals for the trustee who were doing those things necessary to complete this construction would be paid the monies were in fact a positive into an account which we retained a security if that money is not used to pay those expenses it comes back to my client so in effect this is not these are not plans that are essentially available for whomever might want to glom onto them their funds that was specifically allocated by virtue of prizes by virtue of the orders and by groups with the financing documents to be used for the purposes of building out the project and part of that is not just really hammers and nails because you're dealing with a city you're dealing with planning authorities you're dealing with a lot of the other legal requirements to get the assets sold such as you that hoddle units are going to be sold you have a bunch of issues that have to be addressed and the those interests have to be represented by  lawyers and sales agents and other people who are being employed by the trustee for that purpose so that's the reason that this is move your honor because i don't know how you can go back if in fact you take the assumption that under  section sixty forty this financing any tire package is not subject to attack at this point because there was no stay in the portion of the package which is in fact that money that's sitting in that account which we have a security interest and  these complicated long transactions particularly as it gets to the point where this one got to where there have been estimates given and estimates given and blown and we're continuing to run up against the wire where we're it was we're simply not going to complete the project which includes the cost expenses of the trustee who's now they're managing the project and his counsel and the few people who are working for him there's a hell of an image of him all he who is essentially the real stated visor these are the people who i believe going back to january fourth of this time period and then the in the designation of what was going to the money is going to be used for the decoration of mr hill so that we need a hundred some thousand dollars for all these expenses that for approximately a year prior to the order and the issue if he was surprised by the proposed financing order it was not becomes the terms were not made clear it was not becomes the because the terms were not submitted in a timely manner to propose to creditors and other interested part is that in fact the project is completed as quickly as possible the units or so as quickly as possible so that we can stop the a cool of interest which is driving the interstate further and further up think we we understand your position with respect to those issues is there anything with respect to the movement of argument that would be would affect the trustee differently than america no i don't think there's anything good faith and under and half which this court should find and frankly should make a lot of the circuit has to the satisfaction of a burden that there's at least some reasonable measure of evidence of good faith and this case