MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
you wouldn't worst this with respect to these employees was a private employer and i would also suggest that because of the public employee it's even more important that you keep this promise was that this because of the fact that we know that says to protect public employees because they are subject to the when the will often of politicians who say i don't like you know like this so we have a civil service pay roosevelt and in the late the nineteenth century the system in new york which is an i don't know why they did that other than the fact that they wanted to ensure that if the agreement was signed or mayor strong left office and they weren't off and the administrator and these g were still holding positions at the they wanted the police chase and the administrator to continue in office i believe there may have been some tough going to regard to have a smooth transition but a the purpose of the y that the mayor would execute our one extend our contract for another year under this agreement that was our plan so basically we're here today to design our courts and decide how far an outgoing administration see that they were entitled sovereigns on the original agreement it did not these a days in alleged deficit of wellington reached the original agreement they did ask not ask for relief under the original agreement the city  severance under that they would have to show that they were terminated without off base upon the first agreement first agreement provided for a term of know he did not sign the agreement and tell two hours before our new mayor because of a sickly he's asking for thirty seven thousand five hundred dollars an hour pay for two hours of work under employees if you want to there's me setting up a contract they never negotiated it with them the city just does this unilaterally come in saying we're going to change it if you work for a shorter period of time you're going to get a greater amount of severance and now the city is here her viewing there that this is all void and it's all because of things that were solely within the hour of the city to control because one of the legislators leaders might have had people could you imagine what would happen to the laws in illinois if we looked at every one of our our own springfield's and why is he doing this if we were
now here's an old favorite song by earl father hines rosetta rosetta
days to edit it finish it and submit it because i'd already prepaid for the film festival and they just let me know that it can't accept it yeah so i just got a little flyers and down the field is going to be in the
who wants to be a railroad engineer i'd rather be a racing driver with a car that can go places just a minute my boy why do you know what or not you are an engineer right now and engineer like you grandpa what do you mean you're as much of an engineer resign i am tom and you're running a train of your own every day you know right away is the open highway under city just like the railroads you have warning signs to help you make a save run your signals at the traffic lights which guy you are long every section in fact nearly every railroad safety signal is represented safety at high speed you certainly are to follow the example of the locomotive engineers these men drive hundreds of thousands of miles night and day summer and winter year in and year out making their great safety records and the last few years of power and speed of trains have increased tremendously but the engineers over so when shane sensible driving rules are followed these modern cars are a lot safer than the slower cars of yesterday now railroad engineers know that  even when he can't see anything coming he knows that disregard of a slow signal or an attempt to beat the red light is always dangerous so we always allow has plenty of room to stop  then when they get the signal to go the safe driver doesn't spurt ahead at the first glow of the light he waits until you're sure that their way is clear before he starts even though he is a little behind schedule he doesn't try to make up time in congested districts he knows that he is responsible for the most precious cargo in the world human life his passengers have placed their lives in his hands he never forgets this responsibility never take chances like keeps up almost only one thought safety after a long or unusually hard trip he takes his engine in for a service checkup this not only keeps it in good shape and lengthens its life but it helps to retain the safety that was built in when it was new sure all of things are important but what's that got to do with me every one of those things applies to you and your personal driving you have rules to follow just as an engineer does what he takes this train out for a run  away without being absolutely certain that i don't know what the train is approaching where the title of the tracks you never see engineers racing each other to the switch they observe the good issues of the road the engineer i never thought about it that way but you don't need to worry about my driving any more i'm going to run my car like a real engineer and you better be more careful w
consolidated lawyer two or way is not a requisite for this case to move forward gaslighting is a defense mechanism used by attorneys to manipulate and keep control over the court we are not pleading tolling under to  t the latest act actually a new york state mental hygiene law in new york on nine point four one policy enforced by the city of new york was conducted on august department of educational civil rights investigation the actual step special limitations would expire two years after the the department of education had concluded their their investigation which was  don she was a former former professor of mine now i'm being accused of failing failing this class and she she she awarded me with an essay she filed a work sex discrimination suit against the university situations around
popolo gleams a colorful city by the golden gate san francisco originally settled by two franciscan monks and seventeen seventy six the end of american independence san francisco has grown from an indian mission village to one of the largest and most important cities in america in eighteen forty six when the united states to causation of california the total population of san francisco was four hundred thirty two years later the cry of gold was heard around the world and thousands rushed in seeking riches and adventure today the descendants of those  they can swallow the fish but the fish stories are too much for them of fishing or nets need to be dried up after the catch and sometimes mended so that the big ones won't get away when gone in the most interesting city in the union from the air we see the largest swimming pool in a row one thousand feet long with a capacity of six million gallons of in the little pool is reflected in an oriental rustic bridge always an attraction for children the dogs can cross it readily enough but it isn't so easy on me a ma themselves in the warm sunshine showing off to the world that beautiful sealskin coast ages ago they were land animals but for some unknown reason they took to the water beautiful palace of the legion of honor that situated in lincoln park overlooking the golden gate it contains many fine works of art among them a copy of rodin's statue the thank you it was built memorial to the sons of sam the lovely palace of fine arts and all that remains of the panama pacific exposition of one thousand nine hundred thirteen which celebrated the opening of the panama canal this building represented the finest in beautiful pleasure craft sailing the blue waters of the pacific runs one side of the golden gate is that the step of the president formally a spanish kaushal and now i government military reservation transplanted in america
determined that the indiana died dealing cocaine statute which has for either x or for means or elements depending upon the divisibility all four of those items were included under that hospice and in fact one situation like that like in the rd but if this statute is invisible and it's really hard for me to see how financing narcotics activity you know doesn't fit within the generic  the question i think and it will be it will be influenced by the court's analysis of what involvement is involving mean various forms of manufacturing distributing because this does seem to be one step removed from that this is not the correct manufacture or distribution of the evidence contacts whether that particular case involves financing where an individual was simply acting as a purchaser and it made an analogy to a grocery store customer financing the operation of the grocery store and indicated that there was no evidence of financial interest in that particular case without really delving into the nature of that financial interest at play so i think it is one step removed or it is potentially outside of the scope especially indiana supreme court would be that new information again should the answer be different now and so it is for that reason that we would request the court consider certification on that particular point and just last but not least with regard to mr williams know there's one additional point that in my minds important you might disagree with it it brusquely references count one of the information and so when you go to count one of the information as you well know you know you have a class b s much too late this case is on plain your view this could have been raised in the district court it could've been raised in the opening briefing was not done so there also hasn't been any outcry there hasn't been any anything as far as we know from indiana prosecutors entitled to presume that the statute that it led to what the statute reveals there's actually more on the record here than we normally would have because the defendant you know is entirely separate conviction is robert conviction and it just so happens that those were consolidated for police purposes otherwise he wouldn't
streams and waterfalls to an already colorful landscape canyon is an example of raindrop erosion in contrast with the more common process of wearing away by spring rain and snow queen victoria at bryce la yes get a warm welcome with a promise of good food and rent have a helpful how to or exercise cabin for the night have hot and cold running water electric light and them have their own accommodations ranging from the simple tent shelters to elaborate house cars but they all have a good time and they each have a title one thing nobody has to bring along towering formation rising two hundred feet above the canyon base follicle party as it spreads carefully down the trail also to feed big ones little ones old ones and young money follow the winding trails recently buil to open a new part of the canyon to visitors walking man's oldest form of locomotion is a popular spot here against the blue of the western sky a long series of pillars resemble the new york skyline and so the rangers yellow blue and delicate centuries this lonely stone sentinel has kept one nearby bars hammers is held aloft every state in the union is represented among the license plate at the park each summer california led last year with thirteen thousand four hundred sixty eight visiting cars carrying more than thirty eight thousand passengers countries from all over the world are represented nearly five thousand visitors came to the park recently in a single day some of the have their own special ideas of how to utilize this newest most convenient way of modern travel one and to see as a visitor is determined not to miss a single thing so he takes his ride in the open with nothing to interfere with a view of mountain and scenery twenty eight miles of modern auto roads make it easy to see the canyon from end to end in this blessed country the other side of the mountain always back and and great buses join the parade of automobiles and trailers to new and changing scene employees in the camp lodge are chosen from nearby university and must be able to entertain as well as serve each evening a musical automatic program is presented to large visitors a cordial invitation to come again and  the family with a modern car a thousand miles is no obstacle and even those who have only a week or two a peter find it possible to enjoy these great national parks why not make them the scene of your vacation adventure be sure you have a modern dependable automobile then go wherever you choose with safety comfort and economy
first and foremost that petitioner was entourage she never got a fair chance to tell her story from the very beginning the immigration judge asked her confusing and leading questions and when he received an answer that he thought contradicted another statement she important because he asked her a series of questions very very quickly in which you know for example there was one particular question where he said and you were arrested at your home and she said yes she had never said she was arrested at her there is an issue either in the sense that it does not go to the heart of petitioners claim for asylum which is a must you know it can't be some peripheral issue for example the issue we're guarding the citizenship of the man who founded her political party he was an armenian businessman and he was living in europe on armenia with where the petitioner lived and he had a business there she didn't know that he was a russian citizen and that issue does not go to the heart of her her claim for a opportunity to correct it she immediately said no no no there were women she said she was at a women's prison and you know i think the exact the quote is something of something along the lines of the immigration d said three men beat you approximately three men beat you is that what i heard you say and she says yes to yes yes that is at least one hundred eighteen of the administrative record previously however what she had said was whoever could they were beating me she said say she never said men then immigration judge comes back and says and you said three men and i think under under the pressure of the case and i think in particular with the quality of interpretation she was receiving she said yes yes yes having only heard the beaten part and then he said wait i thought you said i thought you said women and immediately she said yes yes yes women they were women she does she made others are not isn't that enough that is enough but i do not think that this particular ground is supportable when viewed in light of the record as a whole and specially if you if you look at the record as a whole the the answers are nonsensical there are so many that variety well i think your honor the fact that she didn't bring her husband's letter is only relevant if the other issues upon which the i j a based adverse credibility determination are supported by substantial evidence and as  isn't the one ground enough which one ground your honor the fact that you didn't bring the most important documents in the matter well as far as to her not having brought that document she is only required to bring corroborative evidence if the other basis of the i j a is adverse credibility determination are supported by substantial evidence as i would argue that they are not right but we what we're talking about is what it shows about her credibility that right well i don't think you can make a credibility determination based on her failure to bring the letter especially since she fled armenia and haste and she brought what she thought would be necessary specifically government documents she didn't
device he is paranoid and i think maybe rightfully so of the government so he goes back again to court and ask what is a destructive device for example with respect to mr stoller i would argue that that while he does have both of those conditions he is still competent and he handles his  know he did plead guilty and and you know part of the criminal justice system is mr stoller you don't have to plead guilty we've got nine counts against you you're found guilty you're going to go to jail for forty five years you plead guilty you will well just now you want count not going and what he was told at the time was you wouldn't even have to go to jail  as it turned out he was sentenced and and he didn't have to go to jail not any rational person gets a choice of going to jail for forty five years and spending whatever money they have in order to try to stay and he just wanted clarification which was the basis for filing the appeal but in addition to that he wants his original conviction overturned opine on what the consequences for him might be should he pick up with b b gun or a pellet gun going forward it was purely speculative it's purely hypothetical and that is exactly what the case for controversy requirement article three prohibits district courts are not of power to just render legal opinions and questions that are merely speculative or hypothetical and that's exactly what he did here moreover with regard to the host of other issues
bought property and built a house and had nine children lemon tree all of trees it's about all they had there this is the ship the america that they came over in nineteen nineteen this is where they came from the camp from a small village grassy area and it was great for them my grandfather was able to get a job working at the mclean hospital he was a caretaker for all of grounds these pictures are for my grandmother the side of the family this is the brother the two of them all he lived here before my grandfather and grandmother came they used to write letters back and forth telling how beautiful it was here these people started right off there the reasons why my grandfather and grandmother came to america my grandfather the house built a nineteen twenty two farm around nineteen twenty five through nineteen forty seven seven of the children were on their own and then there were not a total of nine kids living in that house
the exhaust pipe the exhaust pipe being just about red hot heats up the chemicals and makes the smoke you see from the ground the tanks in the cockpit have to carry about four hundred pounds of smoke  and we have to write long sentences we used to explain not team we have three planes working together out there off mighty close timing on that one but when you get around under it it begins to make sense to make it a little bit easier they have the words already written out upside down on the instrument board but they've also got to keep their the planes have to be strong yet capable of a cruising speed of over a hundred and twenty miles an hour
people important people did and what everyone else access media is a way to me to actually change the world it's a way to communicate to people and share valuable information media  produce and presented a shy but i also did radio training the young women of color in melbourne and i was trying to demonstrate that the voice of the young people particularly young women of color are just as legitimate as voices of all white men right or older white women so what goes on here is ground zero and is gonna come to other places like low income communities crews of color around the country by people and i thought have like two different perspectives that are good to bring together because then you have a wider view of life what the world is really about they should be balanced based on what people know and how people want to learn it is very it is extremely true that no one stopped him out what age you are i think a lot about a n c really excited to be here i was hoping to meet some interesting people from different parts of the country or different parts of the world and have the opportunity to have some conversations that i don't get out of my everyday life but i was hoping to get some skills that i could i was hoping to learn more than i already know which i did one of the things that stands out to me about the and it is that i feel like it and see conference one of the few faces that come to a close as possible to really living out like the mission that it talks about meet people that come from different states without really you know it's  and wonderfully challenging us learning environment like no
remand as the first simplest of the three issues the second issue is whether those a loss to the victim exceeding ten thousand dollars and the third issue necessary is whether b c three fifty eight to the crime of fraud or the c s the first issue i think that remand is inappropriate because the record is complete also the board has had already two opportunities to review the record to find unequivocal evidence of a victim and of a loss to the victim of greater than ten thousand dollars because we had a recent case the reason the dollar you familiar with that yes or no i read that is  i believe that's on point and it's very helpful because the court stated in that the record on remand was and would not be added to the record was complete and in fact that's what i argued in mind response to the government's motion to remand last june i said no new evidence has been submitted that would bolster the board's decision and there's ample evidence in the existing administrative record to show that the board's finding  is unsupportable and i should emphasize that there's nothing to add to the record in this case mr hock's conviction record is more complete than it was in reserve the dollar in that case court had only the charging document and the abstract of judgment in mr hock's case we have the indictment to plead reman the sentencing minutes and the transcripts from both the plea and the don't we let the government respond you still have all your time but at this point i think the issue is when joined should should be unless you want to add anything further well i think we might be able to resolve this case on the issue of whether believe that and that case that there is actually a cancellation so that if proceedings actually became terminated and so this is just a continuation we want to take this back to the board because we feel that there was a legal deficiency in their holding and they should have the right to clarify to ten thousand dollars resulting from the two point five million dollars in profit and they also failed identify the actual people that were ok but isn't isn't isn't that the governments  situation we have here this came up twice the board first reviewed the case on appeal from november to december two thousand and four i raised this very issue and the board had a second opportunity to review their findings when we filed a motion to reopen our reconsider that the previous decision which merely recognize that mr hauck was not convicted of money laundering but went on to find that his conviction for a three fifty eight too was a crime of fraud or c thank you counsel thank you just argued will be submitted for decision