educational programs hundreds of times it's just that he wasn't on payroll he's a contract it expert and consultant and he has test numerous times as an expert in special education or see the as he is a school to the to the basic questions and i'd like you to direct you to the transitional services question you prevailed before the hearing officer heard for the two thousand alot of two thousand and twelve year the erie officer concluded that that in this store but he did about once a week i think but it he has autism he has trauma he has sensory issues in being in a school you could have you could get transition services because the school was providing you some transition services even though they didn't do the assessments so it's i don't i don't think it's right as a matter of law to say that just because  roles i believe misstated the genesis of the supplemental here let me explain and this really there was a hard look at what we were going to be allowed to put on if anything in the district initially considered putting on additional testimony as we proceeded point and again this was through out i have to tell you that we had judge we had known who was actively engaged trying to get to resolution in this matter i don't think he did anything we're satisfied with the record as it exists we have no that that in one of our pleas your honor when the court the night and ask us to refile we evaluated the record and made a determination that the administrative record with all objections in all of our positions is satisfactory to go forward the court as i understand that statement counsel your statement is premised upon the court making a determination the roti is not going to be added as a party as a witness to the record correct or are that's our position at this indicated that we did not need supplementation with not need to go forward and missler rose t n c s his team rejected that they insisted that they be allowed to call  the district does not get to call any other witnesses in fairness judge hadn't rejected them and said we'll go forward i want us to disclose and i want to have a administrative record for purposes of a decision is the rules that are team rejected we came forward with as sort of hadn't called it a modified schedule they were in supplementation of the record not a trial note now at that point your honor we went into the tr at the district court level they adopted the previous testimony and always specs and then they were allowed to present testimony essentially that required it the two new expert witnesses that missed the roll call and all the assertions made by those two witnesses the court is encouraged by me to review the expert testimony of those two witnesses and compare them to the testimony and what position with regard to the other thing that they presented in a think this is important for the court understand they presented testimony and questions from the g s else ok can i  address is you're talking about an evaluation are you talking about because there were valuations alleged in this case that were claimed not to be done that we asked this theory by the expert witness one of the evaluations that was claimed not to have been done is for specific learning disability is that the evaluation you look at your honor i'm talking about the assessment in order to do in order to figure out what  c s as much as they possibly could they work extensively with him in the transportation system he worked in the schools or he participated in volunteer e activities in around was he was provided services from believe the name is alton and they were a separate independent contractor and the testimony in the record is that they provide bit about drafting which is one of the interests that is close in the record you find that the drafting class wasn't you high school which is a your high school to participate in a drafting class with a mean stream students miss cannon took him him being c s on two occasions to find in the record to everybody saying i don't want to go to be nice school i don't hear even if there's a drafting class i will not go over it so that drafting opportunity was yes your honor if in fact that's what i was just getting to what they did was they provided art classes whom through the crossroads program and worked extensively with him drafting in doing those things i think the record will show that indicated that he were daily on drafting and things of that sort is for c s was extremely interested in art they were hard on are they took him to artwork candidly i'm not sure c s was ever would have ever been able to handle the drafting classes and few high school but he chose not to and and you can see the extensive classes that he was given and then he had to compare that with the testimony he was giving mainstream classes he was being taught how to handle money t focus of his education wasn't calculus or trigonometry the focus was actual day to day learning or it was i think critical that oftentimes people forget in this matter is all of these transition plans were approved by the ivy p t a this was a unilateral statement by the school district of what process is  didn't do the right desk had been not decided that they did the right thing if you take a look at judge hands decision what he said is this the non i don't believe he did your honor he may have some instruction in the classroom are different things but be activities that the records beauty education records show that he not only received those community and other transition the relief that you've outlined to the district court i have to tell you from my from my perspective is breathtaking almost six hundred thousand dollars worth of evaluations and one on one that doesn't sound like a drafting class