whether they're actors if you're in front of a bunch of bored twelfth graders who want to sort of speak up to get their attention i will do that whether there was substantial evidence to support the i j c quote adverse credibility finding  why isn't why isn't not mentioning the first time about the shop being burnt out in the week where the applicant failed to mention the first time about his wife being well your honor we would submit that the attack itself was the main events that occurred to petitioner and that prompted her to sue to seek asylum in the united states the shop incident happened after the sexual assisted her for free and that the declaration compiled with the help of the preparer was in fact a summary rather than an exact details recitation of that is and i burned out but she didn't tell the officer why i believe on cross examination she said that the interpreter quote advised her to keep the answers short and succinct yes or no and that's how it was addressed on cross examination this piece of vince occurred during or immediately after the two thousand crew yes it did i believe the sexual attack occurred approximately five days after the coup in two thousand the series of questions that judge kleinfeld asked about the differences between the application and the asylum officer interview and testimony before the i j a you in summary form told us that she had explanations for both can you tell us whether the i j a addressed those explanation so minor and they were central to the heart of the claim and the heart of the claim would be the sexual attack on kitchener approximate five days after the coup was corroborated evidence required in such a situation  it was not required because her testimony was sufficiently detailed consistent and possible to support a claim for asylum if corroborative evidence was required by by way of argument we submit that that cooperate of evidence was not reasonably available to petitioner at the time i cite to the court to examples of petitioner stated that after the attack the sexual tack she sought medical help she obtained a receipt from the doctor but in the course of events after the the attack in this place or lost it wasn't available to her she tried to the family to obtain medical records from the doctor but apparently doctor had relocated to australia and  those records were not available she made a good faith effort to try to obtain that this matter of the business license all business documents that petitioner had with her partner were apparently lost when the shop was burned that anyone asked her about whether she made such an attempt and if she did not make such an attempt a reason why so we would submit that the evidence is not clear on the record as to that particular raw tickler matter corroborative evidence that was kind of unimpressed with that i mean i think i hardly ever get anything in writing from my doctor unless he gives me a prescription and it just doesn't seem like it ordinarily had something in writing it left the doctor's office you wouldn't have a document that proved you were great specially in a place like fiji where the police are the problem and the thing that really impressed me on this case is not mentioning that a shop was burned out at the first either in or application or in our interview he gave explanations for why she didn't mention it could you discuss why those explanations do not require a reversal of the finding of lack of credibility yes your honor concerning why she didn't write down the store being burned down she stated that again as if this counsel pointed out that there was to ask you about these six changes were made prior submitting it and when the immigration judge specifically reviewed the application with the petitioner he said ok last time you change this to me changes i went through certain things and changed it for more time so there were ten a couple of questions about that the way you think it's time application is written it has chosen to focus on what she calls my order which is the right by a police officer that is what she has chosen to describe  background to this right so i guess i didn't even really few it as left out i viewed it as having been swept into the sort of background information people's houses were set on fire all this stuff happened and my family but now i'm going to tell you about when the policeman liked me why is spending persistent it's actually it's interesting you bring that up because i look at it a different way if you tell me the preamble a lot of things happened in fiji houses were burned and states in the preamble to all this saying this is this is the background information that happened here specifically i'm telling you some background information that happened throughout fiji that happens to a lot of fiji and now i want to tell you what happened to me explicitly to me and what happened  the same background stuff prior to the ordeal prior to the writing and i guess i just don't see how that even though it doesn't give the same detail i don't understand why that isn't completely consistent with what evidence your honor you stated that looking at the corroborative evidence you don't think that she should have submitted the medical documentation in fact i think you'll see that the immigration judge discount the medical stuff saying i understand that the individual the doctor that you want to go see  has moved to australia i'm not too worried about that what i am worried about is that you were in business for two years with an individual you could've called her gotten an affidavit from or gotten some business documents showing that you had a business or two you stated to me that you actually had a good business license so there's got to be some record of that somewhere why didn't you get it so i think that the immigration judge kind of discounted the medical documents and focused more on the crowd of evidence with the  specifically addressed by the i j a i noticed in her application she mentions that she was looted she just she doesn't just talk about the weight she says i was hours humiliated other incidents pale in comparison relatively speaking and it would be understandable for her to minimize if you will other events that happened to her and concentrate on what what happened to her that da about five days after after the after the coup in two thousand just one other matter if i may your honor the i gave refer to testimony quote in the extremes and she cited a couple of examples that district testified that there was no system of land dispute resolution with respect to the lease on the shop and that native fijians took everything that they wanted to and that there