we would argue that lengthy and there's the residence only applies if there is an indication the writer director circumstantial evidence of an offer of permanent residence and there is clearly no official sanction in this case and russia of any actually rapidly go through each one i just stated that it appears that the individual was repeating word for word the declaration that is pure speculation and conjecture on their i just part if he is repeating word for word the declaration perhaps it's because it is being devoted to god it was not that they accused them of being a fake christian the government accused them of being a fake basically the sect was viewed as a face type of christianity in armenia and with regard to he walk off the base just simply walk off the base this is again pure speculation that african testified on page seventy four of the ministry of record that some parts of the base did not have security or a strong security how he went to school and open the persecuted again in two thousand and two thousand and one so that does not necessarily undercut the fear of returning to the country and as well as boys have done overseas gonzales in two thousand and five this court held that if you returned to the country simply to gather enough income to flee the country which in this case you'd expect that united out of money and russian which is why you went to armenia and stayed in hiding to ultimately be able to leave the country the passport given to him by the government is not a sufficient hospital record whether it's february twentieth or the first week of february the individual clearly mystery called when exactly in february it was that the incident occurred the hospital records would clearly not state or at least again this is  it could be perhaps because essentially if the hospital stated that the individual was hospitalized as a result of being at the hands of the government in armenia the government is intertwined they would be act risk themselves honor as i addressed earlier and basically with regard to how he walked off the base we can only speculate as to what the conditions are in our he asked the security on a military base we know how it is in the united states we do not know how it is over there and of the armenian government and yes let me ask you this is the sister who was after hearing many hundreds of not testify the same sister who according to his testimony was raped yes your honor and was she in this country at the time of his hearing with a grant of asylum i believe so yes she was and what are we to make of the fact that at the beginning of the hearing the lawyer his lawyer represents the she will testify but at the end of the hearing his lawyer says you know she's changed her mind and she's not going to testify you are generally against any court's concern generally the law is that if there is any other indications of a lack of credibility the court can draw an adverse answer inference and take the record into consideration with with that in mind however in this case we would argue that basically there are no significant inconsistency  he did not even need to present corroborating evidence so we would ask the court not to make that negative interest because they are here here's my problem with it i'm not quite sure as a matter of law what i'm supposed to do it but her presence at the beginning something written in english the method in which he respond like the method in which he responded to the judge i'm sorry i'm hearing you the method in which the mr antonio responded to the judge as i see it gave the judge  rescued the judge didn't believe that that made any sense whatsoever why return if your father is still being arrested secondly he was able to cross the border from armenia to georgia and return from russia to armenia and then leave armenia so at least three and perhaps adding two more if he returns a year on from russia to get a new passport as many as five times a deserving the armenian army was able to cross the border it didn't his sister is present he's in the house military police show up to conscription for the armenian army and he either skates off the balcony or he was able to get rid of them and then when the doubts were raised by the judge and  was he was attacked or beaten or whatever because he was a desert or because he didn't follow orders and events he didn't want to wash clothes and clean up after officers it was essentially the reason why he deserted and then fled to russia know country that provides for mandatory military service and that's not a sufficient grounds finally i'd like to conclude i think right that the green or at least offering that the credibility terminations is clearly supported by substantial evidence in this in this record and a reasonable firefighter would not become healthy to conclude otherwise if the court however determines that credibility credibility termination protester which is temporary residence he was not even given that with regard to the conscientious objection that the government just raised in its oral arguments there could be mixed motives and also an even treatment of detainees in armenia the country records in the