on someone who is a human who knows him well and the at the time his speech is improving but at the time he was barely able to talk and he was unable to communicate and he still is not able to communicate his my husband was unable to remove us me and the children from his insurance so i was on the policy and each time i give them a call they seem easier i kept explaining to them because there are a lot of policies to cover insurance and they will not speak to me until they know for sure where yemen i have to provide them some of the deals look my first day maybe because of the social security number at least you might get through this phone number of some other scenes that they can identify people so there was alone on the mortgage but here but you had to refinance here video for nance and the judge actually still believe that he was on the mortgage because she ruled she said that i will be  always says that he will enjoy time with respect to visitation there was extensive testimony with respect to matthew i'm going to stick to matthew because there's no there's no issue for suspect michael matthew has been diagnosed on the autism spectrum dirt the evidence the trouble the evidence of this that trial showed that prior to the separation it was mr goodwin you not miss ok that was primarily not soley responsible for taking him to speech therapy they spent he took him to whatever activities he could he could participate in prior to the separation after the separation the shock of the children both children state were in the physical custody primarily of the mother and she got her own speech therapist a speech therapist this is evidence it was the trial speech therapist came to the marital home and m have a bond with his child he doesn't have he doesn't know what to do with him the the evidence at trial showed otherwise he does have a bind the evidence at trial also wasn't the issue the issue was actually raised it was the environment not necessarily the bond but in terms of environment for this child raised both i thought but in terms of the environment with the child the evidence a trial showed and that mr we knew spends a lot of his time at his girlfriend's house terms of the visitation that was addressed specifically she found in there in a couple of places in the order she could find that visitation is appropriate overnight visitation is appropriate as long as the as long as matthew has his own to that did he have to get hired at that did not the child spend overnight visitation with the father who was a spouse scratches on the back or something like that was that as read during an overnight this kind of i don't know that that was during an overnight visitation i don't think there was overnight visitation because the father is sensitive to the fact that right now the child is  better off with his own bat which local was the testimony about if the child got agitated then the father would bring the child back home right if that was the testimony if and then overnight visitation if the child becomes if the child's shows or says or indicates that he would rather not be there to fight father is not going to keep him there it's a perspective you know if it happens if the older son is there and he you know notices that his brother feels like he wants to go he wants to go home the father the testimony was of the father isn't going to keep him there just because he's allowed to by pursuant to a court order that's a nobody's best interest  with respect to the other issues raised by the appeal there were reconsider why why was your client asking for clarification with the cost of college one of the motion we consider before the trial court i'm not sure iraq because it wasn't the only thing that happened at trial respect to the college fund as it was but it wasn't raised at trial the but how is it currently is under the control of the bell is it the college for yes and so if the court did that for them addressed that it then they second right yes with respect to the other issue that wasn't raised that trial at all was this issue of the wife needing access to the insurance after as if she were a policy over that wasn't raised to trial at all with respect to the pensions and the split of marital funds that clearly was raised the trial  it wasn't it wasn't expressly resolved none of the there were the court clearly show that it heard evidence and took notes at trial but in terms of the and section of the judgment it's not addressed expressly by which i understood it and i believe which means that we have what we asked for a issues and for frankly we won one issue that we brought up but at the motion to reconsider with with respect to extended visitation for spring break summer break that sort of thing which also wasn't  dressed and we took that to mean that you know our request for extended visitation was that i wasn't addressed that at the trial or our wasn't addressed during the motion we consider or you know one it wasn't resolved it was what was to me this makes you know to me reading this i would think the judge was just straight out wrong with the facts because she says if he's on the mortgage then the lady's got to sell the house with split and give him half of the proceeds if she changed to get him off rather whether he make it sound and give them half the proceeds even though i've given you the house which to me is they say the two paragraphs are completely in conflict with each other is your house you can do it as you not comply with it with getting him off the mortgage then but then he basically they would have an equal amount because the overall value  at that time was about one hundred one thousand dollars that's all going to remain with the wife the pension the might my client has the worse for the city of chicago has one retirement or fifty seven fate of the order my client has his pension was just ok but has her pension who's whatever has the house the equity and the debt and that's the effect of the order and that i believe is it's not an abuse of the trial court's discretion allowing that to to remain in place because of because of all of the other evidence that was a deuce the trial for suspects of the didn't they say different things i don't think so maybe in prior years of who you know who made what in two thousand and nine two thousand and ten i don't think anyone disagrees because there were check stubs i don't think anyone disagrees with and  anyone heard at the time of trial and what anyone paid at the time of trial there was a disagreement with respect to i mean i can address that with respect to this medical medical expenses that m something like if this true area with respect to the medical expenses that that's one of the places where she writes in this is appropriate something to that effect this is appropriate there mr cable mentioned the order that was  entered in june two thousand and ten which order there was a true up as a bad day my client was ordered to pay whatever expenses she raced up to that day from that day on there and the evidence at trial showed that the speech therapy was covered by my client's insurance all the medical expenses of this is all evidence at trial all of the medical expenses that after the june two thousand and ten day that miss mckayla requested that my client pay half of that trial there were only two categories of expenses that my client didn't want to pay for didn't feel it was appropriate that he should pay for one was  speech therapy which was covered by isn't sure it's where all he had to pay all the insured had to pay was twenty dollars copay this week a vote chose to use a speech therapist that wasn't in plan and ended up paying apparently fifty dollars per session my client felt that because it's covered they can find someone in the plan and pay twenty dollars for session so he would pay his half of that twenty dollar hear your clients come here to prove the treatment then she started paying twice at that when she was paying fifty and up to june two thousand and ten they she or her attorney he or she and or her attorney brought a motion for payment of medical expenses which covered up to june two thousand and ten and we were ordered to pay whatever the judge ordered us to pay and which we did  after that she continued to pay fifty dollars even though the speech therapy was by then and after that covered by the insurance she chose to pay fifty instead of finding someone for who she could only pay versus six hundred dollars if your client allegedly my client paid she there there was no there was no testimony at trial i mean the number came out i believe a trial four thousand but there was nothing at trial substantiating that number in terms of evidence there and the parties like i said like i said the parties the only not the only evidence at trial for spector these medical expenses were that the my client believe that once the speech therapy was over he should have to pay the co pay not end if she if she wants to fight and speech addressing the four thousand person the six fifteen whatever it is not being allowed to have overnight visitation my client is amenable and always was to voluntarily make a parental decision as to whether he believes matthew is ready just like mr cable can voice her opinion as to whether he's ready and if not already he will not take them or return my client doesn't want to be in a position where he has to come back to court and prove somehow that you know now as of two thousand and sixteen or something or two thousand and fifteen in august as of today he's ready for overnight visitation as opposed to a week ago when he was writing that my client doesn't want to be in that position extend the visitation during the holidays as well yes yes and that's still your client's position yes and again as as he said a trial if he doesn't intend to the overnight visitation with respect to every other week and this is just curious they had their book the overnight visitation with him i don't know i i don't think he has taken them over like still and probably anybody but i think you can if you know if you want you just have a couple of questioned herself in the judgement who was the provider of speech that even though i provided her with receipts with her speech therapist a variation report from the answer she still wasn't sure she believed that this was can't you know he doesn't understand where he is and he needs some time even to just be free when he's home environment just for him it's every change his heart he's dealing with so you know kind of look at this