tough standard of review to overcome what is your best argument for how the decision by the agency is manifestly contrary to law an abuse of discretion that's a pretty heavy standard of review for you to overcome especially given the fact that the agency in this case took in the time that aeration some inconsistency is in the petitioners testimony for example there was and consistency with regard to how he entered the united states as a manner of entry into the united states various other and consistencies and the agency took those factors and the consideration how can we say that based on those factors taken into was also ordered to be removed from the country so therefore this is an order of removal with a final order because the be dismissed his appeal and we also agree with the petitioner that there is a he had left the sri lanka and he had called home sometime in october th team to speak to his wife and she has said that the police came to the house looking for him and her so  opportunity to stay in mexico as a permanent resident for humanitarian reasons that is also a factor nice to want to point out this is not the firm resettlements are the let me just ask you a clarifying question about that did the agency consider his method of entry or was this factor solely based on the fact that mexico has offered him the opportunity to stay  is that he actually was offered permanent residence in mexico for humanitarian reasons and that brings us to the next factor which is his contacts in the united states because rather sometime he doesn't appear to really have any contact with that individual so there's no significant ties to the united states in an immigration court mr samatar simply stated that he came here because he thought this was the best country so that brings us to the issue of family unification that is an important factor however the beyond a center that they set in their decision while unification of family making that argument with regard to the credibility finding and family reunification so on discuss family reunification st as the you know that there is in the record that he does important consideration consider it but it didn't on overcome the other factors so we want to start that that means that they have properly considered it with regard to the address credibility determination i want to make two point  st of all the immigration judge made a very clear that he was concerned about this inconsistency regarding when the police went to the defamatory home so that clearly is part of the immigration judges address credibility determination in addition to the major inconsistency in his story about whether the police beat him he was also inconsistent about these out of the story as well and then that would  to include any country that will take him and i will i will say to the court the th circuit made in the is the case or zoo pronouncing it correctly that the government's position on that were accepted then the asylum seekers who met the higher standard of proof of persecution that is required for withholding of removal would be the very ones who receive less protection when they were denied asylum on that ground thank you council will take the matter under advisement and that completes our docket for this morning and the court will be in recess until nine o'clock tomorrow morning frank