entrance and asked to come in and speak with her and ask her if she was abusing substances and she cooperated said she had a pill she didn't have permission to have and had been engaged in some on twenty there was shelter care a few days later i did i was not involved my case at that time miss were during agreed that these children could grow with their fathers rather than placed in foster care and she agreed that the oldest child could go to his daycare provider was a friend of ours and also the day care provider of the other children in order to stabilize the situation that time there was a shelter care hearing held in this  d she and i were both right for this hearing that normally would not have been i had filed a new tree in one of the four cases she still had a public defender on some of the cases normally the five or ten minutes before we arrived there she was coming to my office i thought she was straight to the courthouse and she caught the tail end of that hearing and they recognized her appearance there normally and you know then that would not have been a huge because there are ten or fifteen cases and they go all afternoon and they crash case until the whole group is there but that didn't happen that day as i really frankly don't expect all that's part of my sure people here i don't really expect much relief on that when your life your life and sometimes things happen cheater detriment but the adjudication process is where the real evidence is hard and in this case the report which is in the record of the investigator says trying to make with this is that the file this appeal because d c i fast proceedings are not to be substituted for custody hearings there protect children or even children from the hounds so if you're a disgruntled parent it is it is not it has to it has its rules tried great under the the mother was to get a service play and so that she could start working to correct the conditions that really didn't result in the children being removed from the home to say she was not a die hard drug addict or anything like that she she was really minimal early involvement for her and something she's entirely correct and are pretty much on her  nine months to correct the conditions that read that resulted in the children being removed from their care to go through the program of whatever due c f s wants them to do restore the home restore the family to the orders how they quickly created this you can't have it both ways you can't have guardianship to the state in guardianship to father in this kind of circumstances with the case with the case  but there's nothing in the record slim as it is there's not a thing on the record i do believe that this case should be remanded because of this inconsistent disposition order you can take guardianship  a parent and then retain guardianship if it's just improperly done but i think the bigger issue here is and i think on that ground we should be remanded but i think the bigger problem here resulted in the mother's arrest she was placed in custody in the frequent him in jail respond mother failed to address her and we've also says abuse issues leading to an environment injurious to the minors all of that is clear on the record there's absolutely no indications you are finished any services in this case in moving now to the next issue of placement of the children and  the client service plan or she would not be able to follow through with any of those services not as providers would be able to provide services but here it looks like she was provided with here's what you need to complete she started completing the drug treatment state previously filed the motion to compel production of the record on feel it is virtually impossible to determine if there was an error in this positional hearing that occurred in this case when the to get those documents how much longer will we cause a delay in this case so we decided to try to go on with the record we had because it didn't appear we were getting a response from the side so if they're judgement or in view of all circumstances exceeded the bounds of reason and ignored recognised principles of law so that substantial prejudice resulted here in this court should find the use of discretion with regard to agree with our some of those relevant portions of the record by being able to show these hearings were actually no and absent transcripts or other evidence to the contrary people have seen any of the questions are really questions would respectfully ask you to affirm in the state would at this time also withdraw the motion to compel thank you and she didn't do anything i can't she's done a lot of things because i  pleaded parenting classes all except for two classes and the history on that is well case went on with isaiah it was a full six or seven months and the parenting class scheduler told her that it would be three hundred dollars per session each week to do parenting class so i took this up with the judge as to the last case went on in the judge said if d c m press can make that available to me that no cost and the structure from the s