that simple you know it's an education information yes addresses and so forth and so when we proceeded to the residence really located your client in the basement they ate the law officers apprehended ira officers arrived at scene at around four forty in the morning and my gramma was in the back yard of the campbell i will be campbell as we actually don't know where willie campbell was down that was not introduced at trial we do know that one of the officers who was part of the investigation at the home in this case whatsoever of the only evidence introduced at trial was a bloodhound tracking testimony that would be a particularly unique case but we're saying is that this that the evidence of the state introduced was not was not overwhelmingly not overwhelmingly show that eric tyler committed th evidence it's our position that that evidence certainly wasn't a smoking gun in this case in fact the gloves that were found in a room that was adjacent to the room in which barrett was found those gloves did not match the very detailed description that was provided by the victims in this case the victim said they were wearing gloves that were black with a the victims a dent of either gloves or trials as those that they saw one of the offenders where in the cash they found a lot of four hundred seventy seven dollars inside of the house in that same room the rejoicing to where it was found but only two hundred ninety five dollars was taken during the robbery so the fact that four hundred seventy seven dollars was found doesn't necessarily tie that pass to the cash it from the robbery they found a generic black hoodie on the same where eric was was arrested but the jury received information tender during their deliberations showing how critical identification was in this case that they had narrowed in on that as a as an issue of particular import they asked what garrett was wearing at the time of his arrest they also asked about the condition of eric's clothing and the jury knew that willy campbell had been convicted of this offense and that will be campbell's clothing at the time of the us was particularly money they also had this very detailed description and the jury honed in on the fact that the description that they had  here's what we don't have to prove we don't have to prove that a robbery occurred that's not in dispute you know that two individuals have already been convicted of this crime are tyler and billy campbell and both aren't even convicted of this crime your sole responsibility is to determine the  identity of the third robber who is the third robber and they want straight into the blood contract evidence is the very first piece of evidence that they discussed in their closing argument and maybe he did we come back to it is evidence and then i find eric as one of the three individuals next room beside the bed were different it was found and that of course counts with a two hundred ninety five dollars she was going to exact match but he may have had some extra cash in some other place we don't know but it was in the same the nominations as the money that was taken the gas station closer stuff behind the camera and if it could not be excluded from the d n a profile it was on the gloves it was weak but he was not excluding the people know that the money the holding in the phone could not have been placed in the room by the other two robbers because i read it already been caught he was not near the house after the crime and campbell was found hiding in the alley behind the house he campbell was covered with mud but there was no evidence that much was found inside the house so it's likely the camp will never win the house of course not and leave his cellphone in the house do again if i am self if he did go into the house it just makes no sense mrs just a good house testified on the night of the crime she a friend of hers and her son's dead and i was just above asked to borrow or drive either defendant or ira to the other person the location she couldn't remember which person devon to talk about and she refused to let him use the car but she later learned that he'd taken the car despite her refusal  discovery of the defendant in her basement was a shock and this just in she stated that the defendant did not have any business at her house that night and he hadn't been in their house for months it was not a routine visit or the house she also said that she did not keep money in the c so this evidence is clear evidence that overwhelmingly was the defendant is one of the robbers and any reasonable jury would have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on the seven s now defendant course asserts that because the prosecution of her testimony th had responsibility to do determine what the facts work and that any argument be biking also that was not based on the evidence or any reasonable inference from the evidence was to be disregarded so we interrogation that the investigators the detectives tipped off willie campbell and let him know that they had found there tyler possession of his phone and so from that point forward we now have willie campbell fingering our tyler who he now knows the police couldn't eliminate or kyler is not that helpful when it couldn't eliminated believe seventy percent of the white population sixty percent of the hispanic population knows the numbers that we're talking about and in this case in people the shorts found that that in d n a profile which failed to eliminate twenty percent of the population was insufficiently probative to be introduced at trial of speaking to the point that willie campbell couldn't have left his cell phone in the house after the incident two hours transpired from the time  campbell within you know over an hour has passed now feels that it's safe to leave leave the home seize the officers hide in it that when he gets money it's perfectly possible that willie campbell left that phone at the home either before or after this incident occurred evidence but what the state wanted to show here is we have next of the two we now can say that tyler's presence at the crime scene has been accounted for because we know that the bloodhound track distance from the scene of the crime to