the condition was in there she did not check to it check to the pipeline issues but not to this right the court confirmed there were no additional objections and then the titian here waived the reading up t i wouldn't get to wait for here i work in reverse order even the reading of the conditions does not mean that you waive anything else about that that's a three thousand five hundred and fifty three and i said i'm sorry to interrupt but to understand the question that was the package at and i did not claim that waiving breeding alone would constitute so all of those factors which took place here why looking at the whole others i keep going back to thompson pappas that said do these things this way here's what to do get an advance notice make sure the conditions are clear make sure that everybody knows what they are to give up all alcohol do you understand that sir yes i do understand that means even at your religious celebrations you can have it does that mean i can have it in my mouth washington warnings no you can't this is a complete alcohol ban if you find out all anywhere in your house maybe in the clearly unconstitutional that i need to raise this issue myself when i think there are a lot of them i think we can start with armor where farmer laid out the ground work farmers fourteen right so it i think proceedings go in certainly thompson and said look at the statutory factors and by saying generally i want you to have a job if you don't have a job you need to be looking for one and then this provides the rd option or maybe you can be in the course of  of training right that looks more generous to a defendant and so why do i see that as something that i need to step in and object to myself as it is you know would you have included the term suitable and i don't know that you would  and you if you're basically capice to find key terms is the best answer that's the best answer i think that's good it suggests and that probably is the back but we also have to worry about the collateral consequences when you don't ask for that clarity even on the appeal senate would say you know what i've tried everywhere i'm looking eight days and weeks for a job i can't get one the only thing i can find is a bartender job when the bars closing at night probation officer has an issue with on balance you caught a break somehow because we took off you know for invalid conditions and you're only to be sentenced on the remaining bad optics on it but furthermore i would say look what the statute says and it's not a matter of going asking officer is going to look at it and say almost everything you can hypothesize is going to be suitable for you can get a job perhaps are taking i can't think of another example myself just with what i know about that you know this individual pottery classes with nothing to do with getting suitable employment you could strike the word suitable from there and then just the same result right where would it make a difference you could  going to be released she has a certain level of education certainly unless she's not going to be doing anything in prison she could be advancing our education she could be getting vocational training while in prison that she's going to be in a different circumstance when she gets out than when she was modification or an excuse from compliance by the by the clause unless excused by the probation officer or the court and a probation officer the fictional report or imagine probation officer that there is a considering about alcoholism they don't know which places where they are able but i guess you can't be at convenience stores walgreens wal mart places where there might be drugs too because that risk that she is once upon a time an addict and how does she seem to be doing overall if they're like great she's on a good path got a job offer law greens i think the district i think we should trust district judges to make the right decision in those instances i think we should trust the district judges to respect people