fight about i didn't get treated fairly in a divorce should my attorney did this sort of work i always take those sorts of claims with a great deal of skepticism and a great deal of salt because generally i think a if you look at everything on its face fifty six percent of heaven and lisa gets forty four percent this hundred twelve thousand seven hundred seventy six dollars differential and this is a case where i think clearly if you look at the tape here you set forth get seventy four point three percent lisa gets twenty five point seven percent but most importantly that's a differential three hundred eighty thousand four hundred ninety one dollars and there's just no basis in this record support s and that's what i did this and if you look at that you're going to come up with a differential care of getting five hundred fifty four thousand two hundred seven dollars and my fight getting three hundred forty five thousand six ninety eight and that is where the amount of reimbursed impute my fine that's all that reversed and she changed the two properties you come up with every saving five hundred fifty four thousand two hundred seven dollars there was five hundred thousand dollars paid but once again your honor it's in my view and i think it's it was some of your opinions should be a dollar for dollar situations people but money into homes all the time without any corresponding increase in value i think a value added approach where there's been testimony showing that put on the kitchen and in my opinion you kitchen resulted in the appreciation probably by fifty thousand dollars something along those reimbursement that's where you can scour this record and unless i missed something i don't believe i have there's no support so those are my concerns with respect to the initial distribution of price if you then we'll get some of the other issues here that we a what the standard of living in this and what realistically she's going to need to come close to that standard of living and sell i'm sure this was a case where the court said no they reversed the truck or this should be a problem a that's a work out here you have a very similar situation you have an attorney who makes over two hundred thousand dollars a year she has a horse and she she tried to get pregnant and then gave up her teaching position had made some good money back in the day fifty seven thousand dollars  and that's again not going to impact tremendously on mr macdermot civility provide his needs there's no minor children of these parties he has that got it right and he has consistently earned it so i think when you look at all these factors that you know and again i have all the respect in the world for truck court i don't know judge mitchell very well i don't think he does a whole lot of family life but the point of this is that this is a case where if just one that yells at you you look at the record there fifty thousand dollars here kevin and start practice on his own and was as a sole practitioner was building bad each in the end they came together prenup in a sense but she had control over he had control of his it now when it came time to that at some point in time family law is still a legal proceeding it requires evidence it requires the trial judge to waive evidence and make credibility terminations with regard  independence they entered into disparage by rieman lease during the period she chose to work kept her own money which during the marriage income so i'm going to pay for everything and i'm not requiring you circa money aside yes right it is consist only was there were any questions asked what did you do with all that money you earned when  you need somebody to maybe just help ya out of an idea whatever it is trial judge again heard the testimony with regard to this and he made a factual determination well about woman comes here says she's traumatized by her husband's reported affair and tells me she's too upset  and he said well if that's true she can't work the court look at the evidence and determine that her behavior in the things she was but interesting despite the testimony of militating years and all of her testimony about how horrible it was was because of thinking about her ex husband the testimony she managed were looking for just one eighty six was looking for teachers with her experience rape and if the salary this is a woman who had twenty years in the district i mean i think the judge was heavily pre marital proceeds from home but the judge said is these are this money came from the state quiet could explain away money she got during the marriage as a basis to power because we would never meet expectations we have to speculate as to what someone may have thought about what money was used as well is it appropriate for a trial court to without being trauma of separation and divorce brings on certain conditions and symptoms yes and the passage of time lessens those of the people who are able to return to their normal lives his wife think a reservation a review every two years without the benefit of knowing how to do and so forth we have someone make substantial money i don't think that's right i really don't i don't think that's consistent either you know there's a symbolic sions here i think it ra