can look at this evidence and whether the judge improperly denied your old twenty nine that's a review right  subject here when we call it an a k forty seven with a forty eight round clip not if that's a rifle it's an assault rifle it's not a deer hunting rifle this is a real bad shot and so we're using an assault rifle a forty loaded forty eight round that i don't know to be honest was not surprised i don't quite think the question is is there anything in the record because some of these cases it's a little apartment in os x seven hundred square feet and the question and i guess do we know from the record ever anything about is one thing here that distinguishes it from i think most of the other cases that we've looked at in this circuit and even other circuits and that's the expert testimony on what kind of firearms are kind of weapons of choice from drug dealers which include weapons of significant part firepower and semi automatic weapons what about some other business dealings for example by the question then gets turned around to the to the burden that is given this evidence could any reasonable juror make that conclusion and not every reasonable jury but any reasonable service so it seems to me what you just said is well there's other explanations which is true but doesn't that in and of itself say that this is not an  of the important questions here which is what is war yana doing in this house all the evidence the undisputed evidence in the record show that it was a stash house of fees for his drug operations he lived in california with his family he made periodic trips back and forth between california and vancouver and vancouver was where he built his met and he dealt with a lot of math he admitted that in the eighteen months even dealing messed with a street value of at least one point two million dollars pass through that happens at the time he's arrested he's got two pounds of meth in the house with a street value about fifty thousand dollars the only other person living with him in that house is his coconspirator who lives in another room down the hall he's got his packaging equipment in there he's got his drug ledger is in there even the furniture in the house he admitted that he got it in trade for drugs so if the defense here is that a jerk could have found that he has been done for some legitimate purpose for what what is there what is the legitimate purposes only reason for being in washington is to deal drugs everything about that house is connected to his drug deal interest does he even have to protect in washington i think given the nature of the house of ball combine that with the type of weapon we're talking about i think that right there is enough for a rational jerk to find  nexus between the guy and his drug dealing but there was more than that there's another guy in the house there is a loaded nine millimeter that's in the living room along with the paint tray and a small amount of methamphetamine and when you look at the argue that to support the rifle i'd have a little harder problem with that i think i think what spears sorties were saying that the jury can consider the second gun when trying to justify either the first gun as far as a connection with drugs i don't think it's totally irrelevant because if you've got a loaded pistol in the living room of stash house that's pretty good evidence that that one was being used to further of a drug crime maybe not by hand by somebody else and that then may set  renter of the house and the lead person conspiracy knew that that gun was there and that that gun was a valuable to him if he needed to get to it so whether he owned it or not he had access i think the evidence well actually this is not the same as  drug package even from an r in a different room across the hall this circuit has made it clear that there's no absolutely rule that the drugs in the gun be in the same room i think another important thing here is to put this evidence in the context of case i think we have a lot more here but i think most we suggest that the possession plus the expert testimony a lonely be enough to get it to the jury here we go far beyond that the expert testimony here really gives important context to the facts that the jury talked about the expert talked about drug dealers commonly possessing weapons to possess their drugs and drug to protect their drugs and drug proceeds the dea agent also testified about strategic placement he talked about how they often have guns in their bedrooms and he talked about the kind of guns the drug dealers like to have and he said they like to have these high caliber high capacity magazines high firepower weapons all those facts link all tho mostly is a very similar case we're talking about a stash house the guns are not found in the same room with the drugs some of the guns are loaded all these factors that you see that are very similar to the situation we have here i think when you look at the evidence in the totality given the nature of boreanaz business in washington the kind of weapon we're talking about where it is the expert testimony there was enough evidence there for this issue to go to the jury and for a rational jury to find the