credibility issue i think that's interesting yesterday you gave us a business on that isn't there a case law that suggests that a general on responsiveness of phonic on credibility no substantial evidence to sustain the decision on general responsiveness no your honor because if you look at the record as a whole he was not generally responsive he was maybe a little  regards to the dates that he was arrested and only knew the year he was very ill with the part that was in my question i can understand that you may want to argue about whether he was generally unresponsive or not but for me to determine whether someone is generally on responsive or not which is the decision of the i j a i have to find that there is no substantial evidence in the record to suggest that correct so in general then the i j a said he couldn't remember the months of the persecution now but did remember him purrs that publication he had no other problems with demonstrations other than one even though he was the head of the organization for several of those demonstrations and he had no answer for the fact this was the only one this was his first was the first arrest for a demonstration in other words wasn't arrest for demonstrating or was soon rest for hiding militants in a rice paddy or keeping weapons from the militants no medical records to confirm that skull was fractured however his wife still lived in india and he wouldn't admit to arrest in the united states only when i asked why his own counsel and other words the i j a said thought all of these things understand and i think that if he and i don't hear it takes the testimony as a whole again you cannot ignore the fact that he is completely educated leader of a militant movement where the record shows that only high profile people are now targeted would you focus on this medical record because this council says there's no evidence that he could get the records i mean his wife  hospital where he was taken by the police and we understand that there is this indestructible and in the record however mr singh has been in the united states and certainly could have gone to a hospital here for an x ray which would have certainly shown that he know he had a questionable claim and that he should have had some corroborating evidence to support that claim however even without that aspect of the i james denial of the petitioner was adversely credible for various other reasons including his repeated perjurious denial of his arrest in the united states and that was a repeated denial it was not just one time or nationally it was over and over that he denied having been arrested having any recollection having having been arrested allegedly tortured you know held for eight days these are great events and someone's like having your skull fractured being kept in the hospital these are great events in someone's life mr singh was unable to recall even the respond or he made separate statements you know he he was not able to to recall his story with any kind of accuracy you know i think it's unfair for the i j a to target him with i'm responsiveness when he doesn't know why he wasn't arrested on some other occasions that's knowledge that's only within the purview of the government itself they maybe didn't have enough people maybe they didn't intend to rash but then time because of political situations none of this is anything that mr strange should know anything about so now responsible must answer those questions seems to me very speculative your honor respectfully the immigration judge is the best that is in the best position to make credibility determinations position and they weren't limited to questions about his why he was not arrested on other occasions however it is noteworthy that mr singh was not arrested despite having been the leader of several throughout so it's very feasible that at the time the application was prepared ten years prior to the hearing those events were more fresh in his mind ten years later he doesn't remember them as well i think that makes perfect sense we also don't know whether he some evidence that some sort of injury was made to his to his