district court made the determination there was no reasonable suspicion of the equipment violation and that doesn't seem to be challenge on appeal so the question boils down to whether there was reasonable suspicion based on the april sixteenth conversation between green and williams and the problem here is that there was a mistake of law as to the interpretation of that four page transcript and what i suggest to the court is what that transcript really sets or several points what they took out of it this is pages two fifty nine to two sixty two of the excerpts exhibit p it's an evil sixteen conversation stop the declaration details a lot of things other than the april sixteenth that deals potentially with this transportation issue and my question is this if we if we leave out the transportation piece it would appear that there is plenty of cause to believe that in the house that ultimately was good stop or knocking it stop the warrants accepting that premise if you take out the dope from the traffic stop then yes i would front and center there was a lot of this other stuff wasn't mentioned in the affidavit presented to the judge estes he said we just pulled over this guy and we found methamphetamine in the truck and we want it's his house we to warrant to search that house so if you take out the traffic stop and the methamphetamine found in his truck there's not much left when you look at that warrant is that when you store it was not necessarily a drug their records unequivocally establishes that he had been selling small amounts in american performance cycle no see the record does not say that's incorrect because they're going on  point williams to his employee died that protect my investment keep this away from the premises and all the ammo had been for god to make that eight ounce small sales of his house precursor chemicals to green in the morning three green had the connection to this cook who was cooking up the methamphetamine that they would provide more precursor chemicals precursor chemicals to the cook in the morning statement about williams are what was going to happen tomorrow is williams was going to provide brilliancy worms for the precursor chemicals he provided to the cracker policies things more the finished product i'm going to give you some more precursor chemicals you can get now and after the from the other connection out in riverside it's i'm arguing more of a plain reading of it so i have to show when you when you look to reasonable suspicion you look to all of the officers involved in the criminal investigation all the information known to law enforcement officers involved in the investigation is not communicated to the officer who actually makes the stop the council this case unlike we don't have any pattern or practice the surveillance really revealed nothing in this case as opposed to the surveillance in certain and their telephone calls unless you rely cars didn't mean anything either they're completely innocent explanations for all of that and progress so long as it was left was the officer's testimony and promise that when he heard the bag fall on the floor in the garage he said that's not must have been marijuana i suppose is something else of course that was ridiculous in the court found so in this case there is extensive wiretap conversations that have been intercepted and a lot of information is known particularly about the defendant's activities and  also knew that dod had some activity perhaps at american performs the location where he was heading on the day of the stop and then there are the events that happened right before the stop which i think it may not be the most may not have methamphetamine from the methamphetamine explosion so they say some of it really is then says no that's not bad not bad but we'll have the rest we'll have some we're ready for him to go tomorrow and green says good deal they're investigation of the nine there was the existence of this grand practical organisation and that stop would have held valid under the collective knowledge stocker in united states versus rodrigues was just the second circuit case is another case in which the police where you are they were that these were definitely interested in having the office of trying to develop in the kind of probable cause to pull them over for several reasons first of all preserve the integrity of the wiretap which would have been compromised had they had to rely reason why they have the final stop of course is because they believe that he was carrying contraband of the time they didn't like the case decided by the facts only smuggling cases and of course but the police could stop anybody they believe this woman in a crime we less than probable cause and more than a hard and here at the government not only new as a result of the wiretaps that the defendant was engaged in the distribution of methamphetamine with this codefendant williams where he was heading that day but they also knew based upon the circumstances that occurred between the fourteenth in the morning of the stop that they believe the defendant had manufactured methamphetamine on the night prior to him being stopped and williams was expecting some math and thought i mean that morning and that's defendant go into the house where he was i thought they were going to there was there was going to be the manufacturing activity on the night of sixteen and they followed the senate from there to go into this place where they believe he's going to deliver methamphetamine to williams based upon make united states versus local solo which we've cited in our brief that's a case where it was the mistake of law by the officer who made the the stop the c h p officer i believe in that case that's where he thought that's the sort of state  interpretation and it's exactly what happened in this case the defendant had nothing but i mean on him because the officers correctly interpreted what was going on in these phone calls namely that god was a part of the organization that just got lucky and eight other the this is the key call we're talking about two thirds of the way down the page is the statement by williams that we're focusing on here is what is the problem excuse me bob williams  that suffered the explosion occurred that he read about it he's talking about he came up he came up with the eight that the you know he started with twelve and then without a break you know we'll have more for him tomorrow we'll have more ready for him to go to merle williams was the guy obvious the guy that had the source of the precursor chemicals green was the guy that had the connection to the cook the cook supper the explosion