cain yes all right you're just doing telephone then yes that's fine go ahead have you have total ten minutes you want to say two minutes for a bottle yes ok so you have all right that the clock is being adjusted you can be sure you don't have two minutes for  app palate if after they rejected his application purchase a co op apartment it obviously would only be after the fact justification for the violation of the fa the exhibits and the only issue was racial discrimination what evidence is yet to show that race was a factor or you just point me to something in the record whether it is testimony or a document or something of an evidentiary nature and not just a conclusion to show that race was a motivating factor the issue bar and the whole issue was the only reason it was turned down was because of race in the in the evidence we show that and never they never in new york never approved a person of latino all black or asian or the majority of new yorkers and they could not have had the information the alternative defense that existed because it didn't yet you're saying that that the evidence of discrimination is that the the record shows that no applicant of latino asian or black  background was ever approved is that is that what you're saying that's one of the things yes what else is there  acquire that information until after they rejected  there's no evidence that they ever received the at the end from ation because what we have been able to prove by all of the records is that their attorney never provided them with anything they regarded this and that the only reason was that he was of latin american my client was never convicted of anything that's not the point the point is that the th circuit found that he had indicated dishonest behavior and trustworthy behavior but it store it we have the fact that all of the board members testified that they never saw or anything of this matter at all took place one day their attorney was on the board it never appeared in the records it never appears in any document watch so ever and the only fact that a board would do an internet search of applicants meanwhile branches what what evidence is there in the record to show that this was pretext or that it was an anti mexican bias hypothesis on which this case is founded which is that the only reason it's a job went in was rejected by the sheriff lensman in america there was ample evidence that board agreed with that recommendation and that was the basis for the germination that he should be rejected the issue of his being mexican american was never discussed and there was no evidence cain argues that the record shows that no person of color no minority passion was ever approved as that is that in the record well that is certainly their contention but it's a hollow law there's a good there's a different light or standard under the city law now and some of my understanding and i'm sure you'll correct me if i'm wrong is that necessary the necessary showing is that acquired that history is all in there the new york city law puts the onus not on not only the hotel which had a minimal amount of insurance for a building that's war between one and two billion dollars which everyone except the facts of the matter or clear that's why all of the board members rejected that there was ever a meeting the never had a asian american or any of the people or the talking about the only black  member was wrong diana ross something like thirty five years ago and she's been out of that place for i don't know thirty years ago or so the fact of the matter is they the chinese man that he is discussing is under indictment for everything from murder to every other crime you can imagine the indian from ancestors and there has never ever been anyone else that has been checked in any way shape or form m