he pled guilty of the trial court level to robbery and during the course of those pleading during the course of his plea in the state court the prosecutor stated that they had d n a evidence that w link him to a cap that was found to mr mr williams through the state court proceedings never brought this issue up he did not know of some documents he found subsequently for the court who dismissed his case for lack of reliability that that's a perfect answer for the the district court to say how did you find these documents or did you get them because in essence you have to ask yourself why would the police you stated there's a paradox and how somebody can stand up in open court and say they plead guilty and now the sudden years later they want to sing or not guilty well i asked the same question just in person how does a prosecutor get up and open court substantial criminal work and every day people take plea agreements strike and i will say every day but i could say weakly people take a plea agreement when they're not guilty based upon the length of time we're going to get an example somebody is looking at five to twenty five years they've been in jail for two years because they can't make i get a mug in my previous life i get the prosecutor greta five years i can tell that person you'll be out in nine months i understand your own thing you don't you're not guilty but if we go to trial you're not going to see your family for twenty five years so i can promise you you're going to be out in nine months case but the issue is still the same they were told that in that case that there are some destruction of documents and he later found out after he saw such a state appeals that those documents weren't destroyed what  cases how he got those documents is a question for the district court of because he is more than random if you look at the bracy case there he just made journal allegations that the that the judge was taking bribes at the time my case was being conducted and therefore there's a chance he was taking bribes during my case in there is no evidence mr williams goes up above that he produces third party documents that stated that perhaps his basis of plea was based upon faulty information and you also have as my first analogy was given for a reason he received the minimum sentence here i understand that we say hey you don't plead guilty if you're not guilty but sometimes i'm a prosecutor says i got d it would think it would be i would have to think that on this issue was a little more confusing than it should have been my director tension of pages nineteen and twenty of my brief or i discuss williams we taylor and mark me all those set out the twenty two fifty four you requirements to doesn't make a difference that in this case or is an allegation that the prosecutor from going to affirmatively stated their worst such documents and they were do you to use then saying there's a lack of due diligence in not seeking that report to prove the prosecutor lying i see what you're saying i don't think that mr williams has shown that that there was the first coat is there and that's what's be clear let's what mr williams is complaining about his position he alleges there was the police and lied to him about the codice in a letter that was shown to him during his interrogation and that without that codice said there was no factual basis to support his pleading guilty to setting aside the other the other subsequent always claimed in the district court he never changed that claim he's always maintained the happensis had so this this codice head that he claims was was a lie actually is not necessary to link williams to the crime scene because he already admits that the piece of clothing that was in the crime scene is his clothing so there there's no there's no showing i mean setting aside the diligence there's no showing of the second he was represented by counsel with up to and during his guilty plea he demonstrated that he understood the charges against him the nature of the charge against him and he understood all the rights that he was waiving by pleading guilty to the record of his guilty plea clear on all that so he hasn't shown that it was the knowing or voluntary he was attacking the factual basis for the guilty plea which i mean during the plea the prosecutor stayed what the facts were and williams agreed that all yes yes but yes even even setting aside that bit of evidence everything else i mean everything else remains the same and if we take into account the later d n a testing which is what fishing the rest of you ledge that he didn't discover these documents in time to file a timely but he's provided no credible evidence of the date that he located these documents he made no attempts to tell the district or how he found for the facts and bill you're suggesting the failure to the raise it was an inadvertent because the state and actually address the timing this issue and had directed the district court away from it but here there was no discussion of