honor there is absolutely nothing in the record from the from the inception of the dealing between p d x and the department of labor putin to date that would indicate any pretty to have been brought for fraud under fiction either  that the administrative proceedings required a criminal they involve the plaintiffs that made materially false statement knowingly in an affidavit in a formal criminal investigation disciplinary i because again as i mentioned the field audit counting in the one thousand per year are not initiated for the purpose of thanksgiving employer but rather to abide by the u s department of labor field audit program federal interest p r a federal question presented in both appellant creating a prevent state from acting regulations with regard to enter the copying if they knew and you raised these federal claims constitutional claims summary judgment along with the attendant factual evidence and the extent necessary factual fact finding hearing are necessary care about the particular type of preemption claim program that the commission how to structure their business in order to determine their profit margin than how they're going to run operations and then how they're going to provide the services to their client and and  everything else you like yeah i do have a question i'd like ok i'm really bothered by the delay in time before younger was even mentioned that the case was in sixteen at the you know at the beginning of the case before we pretty thousands of pages of discovery and two expert report that great caught and what when the when the state and the commissioner then filed a motion to the  expertise and in this case the commission absolutely has expertise on unemployment compensation laws that can get that get then get reviewed by new jersey help addition in that hour with the a all day pass on the fighting constitutional issues but that was of no moment because the appellate division could still review the constitutional issues raised but the upheld the administrative court can absolutely decide it is a fact and when constitutional issues are necessary in making that fact finding they're that you the state of new jersey permitted to carry decreasing in the federal court for three years discovery complete before it raised the issue of of  abstention that frankly bothers me a great deal because what is the reason particularly when other tension doctrines have been argued in the sided that the state of new jersey did not raise at that in which they simply cannot do i have decided here the appropriate forum is the state court proceeding here we have you know an overriding and vital interest in the state of new jersey protecting its workers i cannot overstate that  valid under the us constitution then until that is decided the state of new jersey has no quantity or unemployment compensation against p d x until that constitutional representations that he wasn't sure if he wanted to see any facts that attention we've made the affirmative representation that we don't intend to take it in fact deposition and should be called they have never indicated that they wanted to until we filed a motion for summary judgment in which they indicated that they thought that they were material dispute and that needed to be resolved before the public and the claimed could be considered  would be great sure let's get the parties please order a copy transcript of this proceeding and split it equally yeah thank you say i thank you and thank you