may please of course counsel counsel i'm great davis hand with me today and with me on the bridge is my law partner every j clarke and i have the privilege of representing western illinois university whether or not university complied with the july th two thousand and seventeen award of arbitrary or frederick victor was an issue exclusively within the primary jurisdiction of the  whether the educational employer has complied with the terms of an arbitration award that decision is contrary to the statute and the supreme court's holdings cop to know or for that reason of the other reasons  court has read the briefs in this four way familiar with the arguments in this case i see no reason to rehash those arguments before you and while i would be pleased to answer any questions you here are really have nothing to add to the on what is already  as my comments at the opening of the nd hearing where we were basically taken kicking and screaming into that room saying you don't have the authority to do this this is for the labor board to decide how  whether parties fail to comply with a binding arbitration award gives the board the same function that's carried out by the circuit courts with respect to words issued under the companion statute for public labor relations act which adopts uniform arbitration act and also  federal courts with respect to private sector labor arbitrations there is an abundance of president which is cited in the board's decision also in the boards and the units briefs from pennsylvania on which the statute  counter and and federal courts and in illinois a commercial arbitration decision finding that arbitrators have the authority to retain jurisdiction to resolve disputes over the romany's they have ordered as part of their authority to resolve the issue as modified by the provisions of this agreement arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the rules and procedures of the american arbitration association and the labor arbitration rules of the america patrician association adopted in the contract   opinion so to that extent seems to me the arbitrator always retains jurisdiction to correct or to clarify what your search but this is saying well that's you know the the arbitration requires compliance with that's just because you say so this is no part of this contract that seems to include it's a very standard language as in other cases where  issue here lies between the duties of the roles of the arbitrator versus the duties and roles of the board and i think that when we use the word compliance to refer so that's going to the compliance of the university for the original arbitration award not a supplement arbitration award it's true the board followed the arbitrator's fighting's a fact and didn't consider matters beyond the arbitrator's finding and record before the arbitrator are properly disregarding evidence presented during the administrative hearing here i think it's important to note that during the administrative hearing the board level administrative hearing on whether the university complied with the st the original arbitration or whether it violated the act failing to do so is that the university attempted to present testimony of a witness who have refused to produce during the supplemental continues because only the arbitrator and not the leader board can determine whether or what the remedy is for a contract violation if there is no compliance with a remedy that the arbitrator order that the contract violation that then has to be remedied by arbitrate or something the leader board can't tell parties bargain for are matters to decided to be decided by the arbitrator relative to the contract violation and it's for the arbitrator to make an award so fully settle the dispute the labor board cannot determine what the revenue should be if there is no compliance compliance with the arbitrator's st with the arbitrator university not complying with the remedies ordered in the st arbitration award