i was also candy for united states congress all these different elections were held in this past year because of the staggering of the different election and petitioning times it was possible to actually run for all three different offices in the same year so that's that's why this case comes  before the court with all these different elections involving the same same music and he different positions on ballots now the new york state board of elections is the most corrupt york state and york city water elections the most thoroughly corrupt organization in the history of the world i think every newspaper new york times daily news new york post always railing about corruption in the board of elections and we can see in this case from the evidence i presented in this case that people got on the ballot who did not fulfill the requirements to be on the ballot and were put on the b anyway by the board of elections and people who worked very hard and circulated petitions has been a lot of money i personally spent more than fifty thousand dollars of my own personal money to run these candidates and including myself for election all that money was because it was all off the ballot and this is going on for years and years this is not a new process this has been a year long process one of the people convicted by the way obtain a ten thousand dollars bribe named dan halloran who personally know this man he he said well his defense was well it has always been done this way and that was perfectly correct it has in fact always been dunces way deprived have been paid all along to put people on the ballot to get people appointed to the board of elections i am asking this court and i think it's the duty of this court to rule this whole thing is invalid all of us just can't un constitutional these people the whole board of election should be disbanded and thrown out because unless that happens even if we replace these particular judges and even if replace these particular commissions or civil action they'll be new people coming in and the same same corrupt system and the reason why the sister many reasons system is unconstitutional is because the chairman of the bronx republican party gets to appoint one commissioner the chairman of bronx bronx republican party has not elected a candidate for any position not even dogcatcher since herman but you know in the one nine hundred seventy s it's been fifty years since the bronx got anybody elected and yet they get to appoint one commissioner their chairman just a point one commissioner republic democratic party chairman also gets to point one commissioner so each of the five boroughs republican democrat you get two point one commissioner but what about the  republican or a democrat a non party members can not participate in any way in the election process so the whole the whole system is wrong and i submit that the entire thing is unconstitutional now when the question level asked me is what about the state courts where you can't expect the state court judges to rule that their own election is illegal that they complain that they can't is committed fraud in order to get them elected judges don't actually there are judges now and they're not going to go back and say that they got they even before a hearing had been held in the board of elections if you play that tape and i believe that the this court should play the video tapes there on you tube and you could see what was going on there you see stanley fish line who is the representative the attorney who always represents the bronx county board of election he stands up and he says it's impossible to be killed twice but i want to make sure that we're going to try to kill this list of candidates a second time to make sure to solicit candidates doesn't get on the ballot now the reason why i said it was because he knew because he's an expert election law and by the way i'd like knows better than anybody else that what is being done is wrong across the board because he has already wrote a book about it so so so this is what i'm saying that you cannot you cannot expect state court judges to rule that the election process is have any republicans or bronx except for five percent of voters and it's just ridiculous that the chairman of the bronx republican party is allowed to elect a commissioner and by the way this one man is actually serving time in prison as far as you know for pain a ten thousand dollars bribe and heller and and by the way isn't it amazing that the former controller of new york state in new york state controlled they always have easy had to serve time in prison and then john lewis who was a new york city controller these are people thirty years i wrote an article about over ten years ago saying and showing exactly how sheldon silver was committing fraud and all these things the things he was eventually convicted for our wrote about an article about ten years ago so it was known that this was going on for a long time funny it had to be at the federal prosecutor had to come in and get convictions of all these different different new york state officials i don't think any state that i know of in the united states has had more people convicted of some sort of misconduct as far as being elected that claim as is precluded certainly by collateral estoppel with a twenty fifteen state court judgment and then also the district court correctly dismissed the claim for failure to state a claim  sloan does not challenge the signature of prominent soften this court has noted that that that signature requirements are constitutional and he also doesn't present evidence that he had the five hundred requisite signatures with regard to this claim that  there was another petition filed by non parties that was invalid that that claim is not properly before the court mr sloan did not raise an objection to that claim at the time and it certainly moot because the election has long since occurred without an objection being raised certainly by mr sloan and then with regard to the challenge to the city the composition of the city board mr sloan black standing to bring that claim his argument is that it harms minor party and independent voters but he is an unrolled democrat and hasn't alleged that he belongs to a minor party or is an independent and the alternative even if he had standing the claim is near a list because the president least forty fifty years since republicans everyone anything the democrats always win so who ever said we have somebody like stanley flying always represents the county commission committee and he not self everybody else so these elections are never actually held because there's only one knocked my slate which i was on by the way i did not circulate these petitions myself i was just asked to add my name to a list of of ten candidates for digital delegate i only got involved in this when i found that they were targeting me and they knocked it off because my name was include list of people that's how somebody because you board elections i'm not the flavor of the month for the board of elections let's be frank about it so so they saw my name there and so i decided not to hose laid off including me so basically we have a situation where one party rule in the bronx anybody that the democrats nominate for judge automatically gets elected they don't even have but they did not have an election there was no election in november for this position because only republicans and democrats had many candidates and therefore there was no but no opposition so the election was never held and all these judges took office for ten year terms without ever having to contest election and i'm i'm saying that all these judges were elected by fraudulent means by forged petitions by by by forgery in many cases and then previously by the way i was a republican and then i shifted to libertarian and i shifted to democrats up in all three parties during this period of time so i have standing from all three different points you republican democrat libertarian and these different elections that all were all were held in the same past year so so so i constitutional legal or proper or anything like that so i'm saying that you this panel here is a panel that has a duty to do something about this because if you don't do it now who will and when it will never happen these processes process will continue on