consciousness of guilt and as the supreme court of united states made perfectly clear in hickory versus united states in the lincoln discussion when the reason why people flee is they're fearful press strenuously that this is not a retrial this is not this court is not to try a fact we are not to rehash all the evidence for this court to make the determination of whether the people proved beyond a reasonable doubt the what we need to figure out right here the standard of review is whether or not any rational jerk would have found it rational jury could have found the defendant guilty given the evidence presented and the people submit that history was clearly irrational and then any rational jury could have convicted the defendant of forgery and that's based on it's a tally of the circumstances surrounding this document and its presentation and the defendant's full flight from  premises first we have the dubious production of this document that should've triggered something within the defendant's curiosity and that the people would submit man this defendant didn't even know he couldn't even give the detective any details of this lamar nixon person so this is a person who just produces this document lamar testified that this thing was did it was mailed to his sister the defendant testified suspicious circumstances and the defendant obviously thought this was fishy or also he wouldn't have gone to three different people that's just the start that's not a stand alone fact that that we're going with we've got to move forward here and with his i d and we're told rolls of how many questions there were the fact remains that the fended testified that it was the question of there if you have any more of these and then he had it was asked to sit down and that triggered his especially without his i d that if the question if you have any more of these was asked to an innocent person that i truly believe and obviously i think the jury truly believe that they would have got into a conversation with the employee asked what he was talking about the employee didn't say who's calling the police he didn't say this is a forgery this is a false document there were no questions there was no testimony that any of the questions had anything to do with pointed to his consciousness of guilt at that moment the jury saw that they saw this again and that he was more into his production because i believe that the evidence shows that this this was produced in a very questionable circumstances by very questionable individuals and that the fact that he flew eat flew from the premises with this you know based on this very late questioning  shows what his mental state was at the time that he presented the documents counsel is talking about flight alone whether flight alone is good enough to prove that is the the mind and i guess if you would submit that this is not fli that's not a standalone fact we have the production of this document the fact that he had to ask three people whether or not this document was was legit all shows that this  wasn't that this was a situation where there was a lot of questionable activity going on  real i don't think it's in somebody's got strong advice from anyone at this point because at that point when they went to the the stork markets in testified he still didn't know when they went to the store whether or not it was real so i don't think anything was solidified at that point at all and again you can point to defend his flight after all of this activity as evidence that he didn't believe it was real at that point otherwise why are you leaving in haste from this location and why are you going finding of guilt in this case they heard they saw the way this this doctor was produced they saw that that the defendant had to ask people whether or not it was real again why would you have to go out ask people if it was real if it wasn't presented in extremely questionable circumstances these all add up to the mental state that he had when he walked into this place and the fact that he left an age i think proves as i wrote in my brief that he was stumped by any kind of questions at this point because he knew when he walked in there that this thing was fake and that's why this very light very innocuous question enforced and believe i think if you walk in with a clean state of mind an innocent person at at the sign of this question i would have got into a conversation with the employee asked him what the heck he was talking about what he was ready to leave at the first sign of of any kind of struggle of any kind of this agreement here and that's why him fleeing so abruptly shows judge the credibility of witnesses weigh the evidence they found guilty and the people so strongly submit that this is this is not afforded a soul on reasonable or improbable or is our own satisfactory so as to leave doubt the jury support to the jury's finding that he didn't that those other locations the prover in the shop right they didn't catch it that there's probably something wrong with this document and that it was a legit document those are places where you  money orders them if it was legit they probably would ashit but because it wasn't to try to third temple i think that supports the juries the jurors finding your honor i would that the people would  inside and who try to do it we don't know we don't even know we don't know why they weren't it was we don't know if someone there said hey this isn't real we're not going after it we don't know if these didn't ca not question you're not told to sit down you're not asked to aid you have any more please so i think any person in a certain sense would know this isn't going i would normally go for something wrong here so he