MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
to i think it is and i think this court under a plain error analysis should take up that issue because there is now playing authority in this circuit on that issue saying that a trial court must suppress  post warning confession obtained during a deliberate to step into a geisha and it least where that the mid interrogation miranda warning is thereby rendered ineffective i think in  government on what basis the judge concluded that he would have gone forward even the offer to another attorney i think that was pure speculation here on the part of the judge that not understand question correctly i believe that the judge you're just speculating on that account the only evidence that we have is the trial attorneys statements in the motion and before the court that he'd been totally unable to communicate with the defendant during i think the three occasions prior to trial when he attempted to the defendant just back stared blankly into space i resisted assisted all in the preparation of the defense refused apparently to consider any settlement offer at all obviously all the circumstances regarding the nature of the confession that the defendant testified to a trial was new to the attorney hearing it for the first time we just don't  motion first for the competency evaluation and then and that was at the calendar call about a week before trial and then on the day of trial there was the motion to withdraw yes  there was no war for by the drugs from this only i don't have the full record then theoretically you said to him do you want to go forward or if i give you another lawyer you think you could communicate better without a lawyer no you're correct your honor the defendant was never asked the sort of questions he was simply asked by the judge in essence you know do you understand what the proceedings are and you want to go forward the courts that issue concern me greatly as well and i believe it's intertwined with the request for a psychiatric examination of the two issues same to be come barring a combined problem with this particular defendant based upon the fact that the defendant was not communicating with his client defense counsel asked for a psychiatric exam and the government agreed within a matter of moments the defendant asked whether or not he could say the process of deciding whether he could have a reasonable representation i was entirely separate issue as far as i can see in which you can cite something missing it wasn't explored at all b you're absolutely correct they don't request was given very short shrift by the trial court due to the the timing of the request the request came on the first day of trial a change of lawyer but here it's more important memory and really it was absolutely no questioning of this going look at the problem is that you want to go forward or you're just having a problem with this lawyer and if i give you another the determine whether defense counsel says i'm making some progress will give me some extra time to talk to the defendant during a break yes but we have case file specifically saying that you don't look at the house talk that way you look at it in terms
as what they claim is direct to many different levels of generality given that why it doesn't resemble why is it not unreasonable demand  a particular formulation when it is clear that for example either we have something like a series of communications to shape contractual some contractual decision making and the contraction decision making of an extremely familiar sword in the face of the world of banking idea that's where they came from their intellectual property so i don't agree that it is there is a step that can be a mormon and i think the danger in removing that action from  step i mean you seem to be complaining that there's inconsistency in this case in articulating the first step but who cares if we can articulate a temp strike that is the first step that's all that's required when summary judgment  these third party guarantees instantaneously and an online that didn't exist either but we rejected it because it was doing an abstract idea programmed on a computer how do you distinguish that is not just  programming here that we have it is not just how the system it's how the system works and this is very you're not arguing that this is a a special new invented computer it's a newly program are the central transaction processing yes we are we know the processor for example is in that it is mind being not just the c p u we know that computer is a very robust and very unique piece of equipment that did not has an important topic that there may be that there is in fact a massive world of of networking and computers and improvements in that world in  the results are displayed are within one a one why is this not like that as mr bridges and i just tried to convey that there were previously computerized systems for banking they have some problems this has happened claims certain kinds of improvements in the computerized system for banking that now enable something that wasn't
one american tom looks like any other when you see it from an airplane window trees line the quiet residential streets and then usually on the highway running through to an industrial area where many town people work but in every but what happened to such a town if it were on the outer fringe of an attack directed at a nearby city we can answer that question in pockets least even though it hasn't happened yet is there is a civil defense test for made to discover the effects of atomic heat on american homes i'm going to show you how protective measures can help guard your home against the heat affects about our tomic explosions  for made on a miniature houses and various stages of inside and out these tents were also made on common fire hazards like dead grass old leaves discarded newspapers and then structures there are test here are two minute or frame houses identical structure both in good condition and well painted outside sturdily mounted cameras in front of the houses are to record the effect of the flash large windows purposely expose the then a house on the right of the earmarks of entirely housekeeping newspapers and magazines lying about an plotted table the house on the left identical to the other but trash has been thrown away tabletops are tied to homs one a firetrap even under ordinary conditions the other cleaned up and press with better safer housekeeping both running for the test bomb housekeeping has doomed this house to destruction in the other house with it's better safer housekeeping bradley extinguished afterward damage yes but the house will stand one house standing one house level both painted and cleaned up outside i houses except for inside conditions and housekeeping now third test three identical miniature frame houses each with varying exterior conditions the same distance from the point of explosion  the house on the right an eyesore but you've seen these same conditions in your own home town on painted wood and look at the paper leaves and crash in the yard in a moment you'll see the results of atomic heat flash on this house the house on the left typical of many homes across the nation heavily weathered dry w and run down condition watch the test now and see what happens under atomic heat did not catch fire close examination revealed only on slight charring of the painted outer circle yes the white house in the middle so by that atomic heat flash the civil defense test pro and how important upkeep is to our houses in towns now it's up to the people to take decisive action needs this help to those long delayed repair jobs now cream your shrubbery and tree we'd and plant flowers keep your block cleaned up due to cleanliness health and safety the four basic doctrines that protect our homes our city you've seen the test you know the story join up with your friends and neighbors for a better safer community
technological process underlying valuation of patient compliance with research protocols in clinical drug trials so we've got a body of law now this been developing over the past year an ad hoc human evaluation of collective patient data for each of these patents so forth in the case of the first category which is the first three passed along eighty nine compliance data historical protocol data and our definitions supplied that based upon that method the other characteristics and this is for example with regard to claim one o specified characteristics there's then the translation and other words that derivation into a decision for production and in fact in the nine seventy patents another so if you're looking at the one  then transform into a state where you can apply it to an individual patient and that's what this technology is about there's nothing in the record here your honor that this was a conventional in that case in that this is a were technological wishes sorts of animation of animation going on here whereas in this case we're talking about organizing teaming up human activity and there's a specific role computer technology this is in the context of computer applications and others involving just using a computer to do something which is otherwise let's say for lack of a better term like being how does wasn't on the path so i'm looking at just from the objective like it struck me that they it was pretty generic it struck me as as well as being pretty generic is a lot whereas if you had a plan it was a genius claim to the difference here is there was at least so make an algorithm that says if you miss two then let's apply that to the data that's going on in the current clinical trial and let's flag these individuals and either prompt them to make sure they respond exclude their data or do one of these things that all  all around organizing the human activity of the clinical trial as well as is different from regrow we have a technological animation that you're working on in a computer environment to animate a pads all two hundred twenty seven of them are involved in providing data analyzing data and then using that in some way or fashion for clinical trial complian think of so in summary the do you happen to know if this is the prior art involve instances in which there is electronic reporting of compliance i do not know the answer if there's electron i'm not sure it's relevant or survives you know all of the data even if it's not paper is put amenable process step two there's no one better of concept to transform the abstract idea that claims include no meaningful research is on the mental process of comparing data fair warning electric power and all i p are all completely irrelevant here all these cases for example is notably fair warning were mere implementations of an  specific than the micro case in terms of the specified will and the application that rule as an order combination to get the result i would also submit to the basket case unlike ours the individual elements were generic well no routine that's not the case here and if anything your honour's i would submit to the court that this
understand the way your motion was filed it was a motion to add these claims for consideration and then the judge below concluded you know these claims are really not meaningfully different than the actual claim that necessarily invalidates the claims although it was necessary based on the view that those claims are no better under section one or is that a fair way to understand when the firm and secure would mean for functioning in their conventional managed by the information to use or which is we think not accurate with respect to last year's client for example there's no evidence that the combination of component didn't affect the invention in deciding that these claims were directed to basic human activities on generic hardware and therefore help while the ballot just curious what if we didn't have that statement that i read out of the specification a few minutes ago don't we wouldn't know we wouldn't have any confidence that it that it's a conventional configuration of all those generic components are known components fair enough it certainly helps
the grownups have things to talk about but andy and jane have their plans all of that the first thing to do is to show their city cut loose some new things around the farm and because it is a dairy farm the first thing they show  well that's pretty much what it is betty as a matter of fact colors are a lot like people now this feed is a special mixture of grown brains with the extra vitamins and minerals the cause must eat to stay healthy course they eat  need all different kinds of good food plenty of good clean water and a clean comfortable place to live that way they go to be strong and healthy but i've got to get over there and help your brother bill with the milking you know and the i think maybe that he and george would like to see the h i can't do it that's ok george you can do it now but the bigger and stronger you get and the more you practice the more things you can do you'll be able to do it by the end of the summer georgian very soon discovered that on a farm everybody has work to do right now this new cap doesn't need any help it's just two days old but it knows where its dinner is but later on it will water they need to make good fresh milk there was plenty for everybody to do that he helped jane take care of the baby lamb and they all learned about big don't have good table manners but they enjoy their dinner a mixture of milk and brown greens later they will eat corn and other kinds of baby chicks two are started out on a special mixture of ground up grain milk and other feet this is betty's and james favorite chore the baby chicks are so soft and cuddly  gains kitten love to drink when the dinner bell rings no one has to call the girls twice they run to the house and wash up quickly so they won't be like living on a farm makes you hungry and aunt helen is certainly a good look at all wonderful things to eat it takes all kinds of good food to build up muscles and let us grow bigger and stronger is the way the summer when play work and rest the children help with the chores while bill helped in the cornfield and the in george kept the vegetable garden clear of wheat it was fun to especially riding the horses whenever they were hungry in the middle of the afternoon there were snacks under the shady trees in the big yard and twice a week letters from home in the big mailbox beside the highway as the summer passed everything seemed to grow the corn was lehi on george when he came now it's taller than he is and he's calf is bigger and eating like a grown c they had good nourishing food to grow and plenty of sleep but summer is over and george and betty are waiting for their parents to take them back to the city it's time for good bye now but the children will have a lot to tell their friends a
moore is bound by the arbitration clause in this case between dynamics now known as to final mile and sell when based on the principles of a stop all and third party beneficiary even though he neither signed nor knew about the clause apparently therefore the district court's decision should be reversed and this matter should be compelled to our tradition mr cheney's arguments from starting the national labor relations act public policy theories there's the stoppel theory which is that the person knowingly increases the benefits of the perceived benefits and that if they are an intended third party beneficiary of the agreement and here both aspects are present so mr y dini alleges in paragraph twenty of his complaint joint employment relationship between himself and three in the complaint he makes it very clear that even though he believes dynamics hired him he actually worked through sell when he had he acknowledges that he had an agreement with sell when that sell when his the one who paid him that the deductions that are an issue here were made instead i don't think that the sentence requires that the claims actually be made as an agent i don't think that's the intent but it says that the claims have to be made as an agent it's that claims mister dynamics agree enter into a contract with sell and sell when under the agreement have the ability to either hire people directly his employees are some contract sell when it's position i don't know someone is not a party disagree with that we are human is that the that wang even though it didn't actually happen a vince is the party's intent that all sub contractors are in or employees common within the skull  complaint and it was just trying to supply a possibility that dynamics might argue no he wasn't an employee of us he was an appointee of solomon birth that's that's the only reason that it was in the complaint i think that's clear from the complaint as a whole absolutely if he had entered into a contract and if you into a contract with that it would depend on what the terms of contracts are of course if there were an arbitration provision in there then it
been as accommodating as you as you've been the district court was also very reasonable with you you need to address their needs yes i mean it is how you  class can be developed under equal protection as i understand it you need not only to have but also you need the fundamental right and i believe in this case we have both the fundamental right and the boss defined pop as equal protection now the reason i'm here i in this case cite i thought about it for months even i think years but there seems to be no question that under the constitution is simply gone a bridge too far there absolutely and without question beyond all known case they are  don't really remember for sure but i point out that recent evidence shows that under poverty black spanish people seem to be generally summarily included law seem to keep changing in a car accident case you break the r s ten thousand dollars is a finite amount but here in the case all the numbers are changing the law is changing the facts are changing for example  here employees that were exempt does not mean that in state individuals were in any way favored oh here you can be in state or out staters it's quite possible to know here employ lives for example  not only the right to travel it's got other got right in there for example it's got the right associate when the bomb goes to o'hare or use the bathroom to go look at the museum out there and visit with the asian girls coming in from china his right to associate in all kinds of cases one of them says you have the right to associate the last look the guy said he wanted to go to i think it was harvard something like that and they said yeah no difference and he says no i want to go there taste for pretty much everything in there is builders you know if you go right through it real quick remember it correctly it's not interesting i think by the cases it is there's no federal right to taste which is an off point case it does not involve a fundamental right that involves government fundamental rights on a pendulum right there over here the government rights are over here well we're over here and there are cases over there that just interstate interstate all kinds of
hundred dollars plus perhaps additional hundred dollars it's taken without due process because under the terms of blakemore's ordinance you're slanted to certain defenses you can only race three or four dispenses you cannot know i don't remember to that would say automated red light program in a fact or something like that correct usually that case at the at the intersections our record doesn't reveal there wasn't any discussion on our record about about that here but i do believe that is the don't agree with your point entirely it is the most important claim in the suit it's what keeps the suit here in federal court it's what gets them their attorneys fees if they win and yet we saw nothing about it in the briefs it is the most important point here
is this a joke who died i got it when i call it operation no work so we have to plan that the plainly operational work it's time to execute it let's do it made of four basic steps in order to succeed the question is will we
simply in an effort to learn whether any pre filing investigation and been done and add to the the first sort that information from the storage signs and getting no answer from him  proceedings so i just referred to prior to the declarations filed in response to a motion for summary judgment but all the activities that send in the red bull that they are good and that they wanted  acquired because it appeared that orange did testify that the control room was what they said it was but they left out part of the transcript so they were wrong  would like to address three issues this morning all three are factual issues factual issues are the only issues that have been raised by the pallies on appeal under the abuse of discretion standard or factual issues are reviewed for clear are the investigation had been done and it will let in motion would not have been necessitated certain other motions in limine a for example were conducted as a result of the false testimony  factual matter that because mr orange dean had said that no investigation had been done or at least that he knew of none that these were all proceedings that were caused by that perhaps if mr orange dean had explicitly permits that type of  determining that this is an objective not a subjective review this conduct did relate directly to proceedings that were relevant to the case this was all part of citric his efforts to understand the basis for why th abridgement was and orange being had identified only himself as person having relevant knowledge regarding that so citrix naturally at his deposition saw that information from him we were rebuffed with a false answer and as a result we were forced to spend time and money and effort on an additional proceedings to discover the basis for this  an additional proceedings once it was revealed that the testimony was false into the false testimony itself regarding a rule eleven motion which was premised on the fact that the testimony was in fact true which later turned out to be false the fact that citrus had so these for for certain categories of activities that they conducted in the magistrates found that only two of those were actually within the modified proceedings as well as part of a third of the cattle are certain motions in l to reduce particular line items because counsel failed to identify any specific line items that were not relevant to the sanction conduct must the court has any other questions on to  definition for the controller was correct in fact it turns out that as i mentioned earlier that this was a dominant  said there was no true filings investigation he didn't say that he never said that he said he didn't  because he didn't know what was going