nothing pardon our different from the grading of and i'm not sure what factors go into grading i don't think taste is one of  eggs better or worse based on based on i think it would be subject to the same cause attack the department argues that that substantially similar i think there's a very minor difference but the big difference here for our purposes is that the federal standards are discretionary atmosphere we have a mandatory system which imposes great costs  particularly our producers for the benefit of big producer really and so it has it's a different type of bird it may be rational under the federal system for some producers to choose to undergo great things but just because reason for imposing the law is a different inquiry about whether there's a rational reason for distinguishing between two similar things but we've also brought in additional equal protection argument that it's not rational to distinguish between time they produce and you're back now at a greater maker could hire someone on staff and pay them a wage that way you could have somebody on contract and pay them for each batch they crave so it sort of depends on your but also if they're going to comply with slots they either have to change their entire distribution system so as to find a way to and then you can go below that and and obviously this is a small operation and you do it through it's costly but we get back to the rational basis legislature passes something it's presumably rational t some i mean it's a little to the extent that the let's say a lot of the neatest little or every business starts out very small and you know starbucks was once a small business it's not it's certainly not land o'lakes it's may impose a quality standard above just a baseline safety standard for products and that's the head case that was a ban on certain products and all laws that regulates the production of certain products  or any sort of labeling law like nutrition labeling law they increase the cost of production and therefore make it harder harder at least some marginal sense for consumers to reach products but that doesn't mean the law lacks a rational basis and the reason dominant market preferences so modern hearing is based on objective characteristics of the putter that's readily discernible by competent creators so we have the flavor characteristics the body characteristics the salt and the color s mention that uniformity in a product is a legitimate thing that government can look for and mandate disclosure of the buttercream law has you know forty characteristics yet it has to be uniform and body and color now we can't you know for me if i describe defects in the  the rational basis test is to show that reasonable legislature could have concluded that the law would further a government interest not that evidence actually exists in a courtroom to show that that relationship between that challenge the district court has a fact finding that the ban would not actually limit graffiti which it was chicago's a certain interest and this court set it to say a partial quote exists indeed that one may be imagined is required her no your honor i don't think it's a legitimate concern there was a dispute on what exactly they were told at the beginning of these proceedings there was reference to a phone call and which the price of the phone call may have misunderstood what the question was so wisconsin law does not require you to be in wisconsin to be a part or greater they will license anyone in the state in need though they will even license anyone in the world if you apply pay the seventy five dollars fee and pass licensing exam in wisconsin you do have to take the exam in wisconsin that's because the wisconsin department employees have to administer the exam but that sort of discrimination if you could be called that geography is not based on lines so someone in when grading so my friends or have said that there is some discrepancy and it's true there is minor discrepancies those discrepancies are usually worked out in the usually based on whether or not a particular characteristic is present to us like degree or a definite that was a policy they have not done anything to formally change it and europe therefore entitled to a declaration that the past policy was unconstitutional whether the remedy is to strike down the whole thing or just to declare t can't go around staffing projects good or bad