as i read through the briefs to wonder ok if she could have gotten past the moral character question what would have happened obviously the i j a was fairly sympathetic and that question didn't go up because of the live problem what's the hardship i understand as a hardship with respect to one of the children who were born prematurely and has asthma and reading an immunity problems are there any other any other hardships besides that that is the hardship it was a under developed lung that was testified regarding your style and that was in september of two thousand and three and then there was a short continuance to september thirtieth and it at that time and she she had she had exaggerated claim that yes she was beaten that joy if you lied about well you know i mean she had been beaten by federal judicial police in mexico but she cheat she admitted that she lied about the circumstances she said she changed the context and she's she said that it's not true that they came to the but it had been caught in this situation in which mr god had told her that you have to exaggerate your claim this certainly doesn't absolve for of all guilty and she's she's the in adult but friend appearance of the asylum officer or is he a gorilla going to cook her goose when he shows up or or is the evidence that the asylum officer has already on the record i mean i'm trying to i'm trying to figure out a way where you know it really doesn't make any difference whether you shows up for not but i'm having trouble getting there officer had shown up it would it would still you know she still wouldn't be absolved of having fabricated an incident on her side and that's ok this may be on the record and i just don't know yet and you can tell me i'm not sure how much difference this might make the ultimate disposition was she one of those unfortunates that was counseled by her attorney in this case mr gotta to come forward to a sort of put yourself in the process in the expectation that alyson i can get you  couldn't because that she would never come to the attention of the immigration service i mean sheet he put her intentionally put her in proceedings he took her to two found office because the only way that she can apply for cancellation of removal is before an immigration judge and you that no if she had been discovered she would have been put in removal proceedings and required to go before a judge and if she's deployed for cancellation of removal as you know basis you know no child well but by the time she got to the individual hearing though she did have intentionally put into asylum proceedings but misguided actually on page one seventy six of the record that he she testified she he never told her to file an athlete sheet she concedes he never told her to file an and she even testified that she didn't appear for the asylum officer hearing and of before the asylum officer and so she was lying throughout it was only when she was pushed against the wall you know she understood she was applying for ten years not for asylum and that that was the you know what brought her to the before the court i think she recanted the when she did come out on  september thirtieth she was very straight forward and recanted and told her her real situation and i think under those circumstances and the and also in light of the history of this case of of