thank you thank you good morning your honor your honor my name is cheryl dukes and i'm here on behalf of my deceased husband ralph who passed away as the result of the complications due to exasperate complications due to him working as a motor vehicle  operator for health and hospitals corporation and the more department where he transported body remains to be a burial site for about two years and so he passed away in two thousand and seven for about nine eleven yes nine eleven and on mike's press this and and the record i expressed this before all of the courts the lower courts district courts and  so i presented in two thousand and eight to nicer through their process that i wanted to file for a line of duty accidental death benefits because  it was a recognized and i was denied so i went through after a long drawn out process some went through the legal procedures to have my husband's voice heard and have my like ok that's the district that's where i should be to come and find out based on the fact that i'm pro se and i don't know a little the legal ramifications who lords rules and regulations i'm not expert that one the case should have gone to the s d n y southern district of new york and to that because i use new york address there was a problem with that when i actually lived in pennsylvania have a mailing address new york i have between new york and pennsylvania i have both residents  appealed you peeled from this eastern district the servant as it did you i mean you you brought something to the did you file something in the southern district yeah i had to because i was heard in the eastern district the time you were heard in the southern district yipes had my mom i was taking care of my mom first i was taking care my husband who passed away in new york and i took care of my mom who passed by all in new york city because the way that my house is situated and the services that are we see a better and easier in new york the place that they have their residence in new york was my business i used to do here and i'll go soon but then you moved once  fifth two thousand and fourteen and i the case was dismissed i think may march twenty something two thousand and sixteen which case the s d n i'm trying to figure out whether you were in the same circumstance in terms where you live when you were in the eastern district as you were when you were in the southern district or whether it changed between the time you were in the eastern thousand and fifty fifty and the eastern district eastern district rolled up be february february two thousand and fifteen before you diversity and that was also decided in two thousand and fourteen right and then in may of two thousand and fifteen right mildly it is sunday as d n y also rule saying so a spontaneous you know on her own accord that she it's kind of tricky because e d and mark claims that they did not have jurisdiction and subject matter stewart's jurisdiction and actually they would in normal circumstances because of the fact that  i was living in two different states but my domicile was pennsylvania i understand that you have to understand what we're trying to put your is whether your circumstances changed between the the eastern district proceedings and the southern district proceedings where the your circumstances changed so that even if the eastern district was correct in in in dismissing your case perhaps the southern the air and track transportation safety security and we understand that