we set out in her three times extended quote from united states versus gilpin which i think defines three elements for determining whether second the place to be searched and then finally that the items to be seen by their relationship to the designated crime he specif substantive communications that of why are only communications to the victims pertinent to this crime i'm cr is the charges criminal record with a deadly weapon correct so the relationship of the defendant to the weapons certainly relevant and so  with d n a evidence of the crime of criminal recklessness that description in the warrant gives the executing officer unbridled discretion to look at every digital file in the cell phone what about pictures and videos i mean you just given the circumstances the police department in warsaw indiana had on its hands here when they can get a search warrant to go through the cell phone they have a shooting there is concerned about concerns about drug dealing aren't photos and video something that should be authorized to take a look at that from the affidavit for that for the search warrant that would really support that we haven't even impose these kind of requirements when it comes to searching a computer have we so a search warrant a warrant is issued to search a computer in a drug dealing case right we would authorize the d n a to look at a quick books file on that computer or some kind of other financial program to see whether it's accounting for drug transactions debts owed  don't require that kind of specificity in the computer contact narrow it down to financial transactions relating to that to the drug transactions or  those kind of things we did so whole point of the specificity is you don't get to search through it but target entire find and that's really it's it's  against maryland that if you're searching for say securities fraud that warrant consenting to search every scrap of paper in the company's office for evidence that their financial misrepresented it's hard to see how a warrant for securities fraud would be different from that and if that's a proper warrant in a securities fraud case why wasn't this a proper warrant in  criminal recklessness with a deadly weapon that that company or individual hands with because that the communications are either accurate or fraudulent so but yeah and you have to look at all of them to figure out and your honor is right the supreme court considered that challenge it said no this isn't a search for anything anywhere in the state informed it's a search for evidence of this particular crime it is dealt with that issue in other cases as we've referenced in our cannot search in this case it did that by link it to the crime ridden criminal records from one other point on but the mr bishop says that the warrant should or should have said individuals or they're just trying to figure out a crew shot why they shot and what's going on here and so they're looking for evidence of criminal recklessness on the phone this court has said you should take into account the circumstances surrounding the warrant and whether the officers gave as much information in the language in the warrant is talking about any evidence of suspect identity motive scheme or twenty and it appears that