counsel during any of this but in my review of all of the transcripts in the record the state evidence contradicted itself throughout the course of these proceedings now just to kind of take it take a brief moment i think that's right yeah but in the ear and i want i want us i want the government to be able to say you know what we did everything that we should have done and you parents were the one that messed up and i think that when we when we start looking yeah i didn't see her we're we're going to see that there were some major inconsistency between what we the government should have been doing and what was actually done so what would offset the test i think there was some testimony on the record about the children were dropped off and then not seen for days and then one time even a week now said been contradicted by another mistake is that all of the service plans in this case were rated and satisfactory answers to theresa on signing consent and yet there was never any testimony as to when the case called the early years and that was with her shoulders and it was after that completion that the service plan then added a little blurb at the end that she needed to complete the reason not enter counseling at that point as it could probably would be used against her in any time criminal case as well as the fact that it's important to be forthright during counseling so the first two only go to intervention services and then in the course of those intervention services she was referred to treatment on march two thousand and now these were six positives and not all of those are for her man there was only one from out one was on june nineteenth two thousand and eight and get tested creating levels if the love that would be twenty or below and that would indicate back the person was trying to cluster system by drinking just you know unlimited gallons of water and then if they're high that would these private service agencies as well as providers that work with these people that are put it that we the government put into the system and i think that we need to start holding them to a higher standard here but he keeps talking about that parent because of drug abuse i think the router could reasonably conclude that if the respondents brother and son say that she's and didn't properly care for the children because she was using drugs that she could young children in the car to jeremiah in jail and two response grandchildren also it are again containing cocaine open cans of beer and precursors that even when they were living with one of their aunts mother would leave them alone the children alone for days and in time when they were six years of age or younger so you've got a really serious problem  eight prior to the that nine month period responded to twice refused to go into rehab for drugs she said it was on advice counsel but i don't see how it would incriminate her to go in rehabilitation provided she didn't talk about a specific target against then after the nine month period started she was referred to franklin williamson human services and was with that program for about six months during the nine month period she was terminated unsuccessfully complete that program until long after the end of the nine month period but there was testimony in which the drug was entitle to leave that during before during and after the end of the nine month period respond tested positive for alcohol or controlled substances repeated specifically they were positive test for methamphetamine opiates or alcohol on february twenty sixth two thousand and seven june nineteenth two thousand da world was manipulating the system by pushing our the legal drugs from her system before those tests and another fact which indicates that she was still abusing drugs before going after the description was supposedly for an operation which took place in september a month and a half before and was for five days and those i mean no physician is going to have someone take an opiate for month and a half and as for the allegation that the judge incorrectly found that the responding had not completed the makers of coke program this matter of fact the judge's written viney specifically stated that she had completed the initial positive tests for methamphetamine on november the eleventh of november twenty fifth that was the case those tests were for the hydrocodone and the o b and also i believe that it was stated where it is if there was a positive test for methamphetamine on june nineteenth two thousand and eight that's not correct that was the test for alcohol and i can follow him down down the rest of the list with regard to the visitations it was argued that she didn't comply with the station plans because she was making statements to the children specifically in the record the fact that surround them are that at one point when the children they were out of hearing distance of the case that was that was number two and then number three was that the kids had four wheelers they are and they all land rode the four wheelers and they were out of the distan