filing which is extremely brief does not contradict any of the defense of the defendant's tracks and supplements only very briefly but those are the facts the facts contained in was an idea about reasonable accommodations so one of the things that we pointed out in our brief was the fact that there was a general issue of material fact on several occasions person very last week gave evidence to show that there was a general issue granted a reasonable accommodation in respect to your spank your spunk no more requests going to respect to the request that was named by my client yes my carmina request the request according to case law were specific as residents the spring work like that there was considerable back and forth about that proposed accommodation your client at one point said but there was there there was never any point of the sprinkle accommodation  dation for just that the issues that we had in the depositions that we gave was that they actually did want to do something but they felt that the strength of iraq was being applied properly and we said but it did have to adjust and give the people what they needed for that situation in this situation where happens is that the they were supposed to look at it on a case by case basis they were supposed to analyze this at analyze the situation extent he is trying to allude to some sort of evidence that is not in the record simply you're there not to gild the lily on this right but i think it's entirely obvious that the record in front of this mr somerset was rather than have the court issue a decision i would agree to lower the occupancy to fifty dollars which brings him under that threshold six or more in the state's preferred statute afterwards the density solicitor followed up in order to have that in writing and of course ask for inspections in order to make sure that this was the case and it was at that time that plaintiff for lack of a better phrase hung up the phone that's where the conversation ended winter was not really to do that in her decision just casper said well if we're talking about where we left off on that accommodation for question conversation there especially for elements and she went through each of those elements  specifically as a sub circuit case has pointed out that in the server home context you can't as an owner of the home say that i'm not going to have the money to put in these fire sprinklers because it's go were some ongoing negotiations with the city but one of the things at the city could've city didn't on for our city to give alternatives to that we actually did was about things like call boxes we actually spoke to fire people and went through those things the the other thing that we talk about is the fact that this affects them as well because of the added cost the added cost to them and a lot of these people are low income and have a very low supply it asked the stress as to whether or not they're going to have a  has to show that the city is willing to work with the with the president with my clients respect and what we were able to show by the testimony of the city employees is that they did have agents of the city go on and  a situation is discriminatory because they basically are being told that they have to ask because they're not political family so the application of that for that reason alone shows that again the city is picking and choosing who they want and who they don't want as far as residents