d what this case this case involves privilege determinations and whether or not the record supports or there's substantial evidence to support a determination and it reiterate saying ok let's assume we find there wasn't an adequate credibility terminations and we decide that we have to accept her testimony as credible e response and the reason i don't mean to be argumentative or not answer the question i will move on to the other issues in the case regarding the imputed political opinion but i think here the issue of credibility is so ti found and the legal issues in this case and let me just provide examples and i think that will shed light on what that argument the for example the government will argue that and tied up in legal determination  whether or not this pain these children are still in guatemala or whether they were harmed and doesn't that show that you know she's able to return to the country or why or why are they still there and she's here  and in the credibility finding made by the f b i a person i j did not touch upon credibility issues relating to where her children are except to pages and satisfied in this case and the record shows that mr love has worked for the government that's something that the b i and i j don't address and that he was an air traffic controller they wanted him to help him well there's nothing to show that the negroes were they were concerned with his position as an air traffic control in fact he says that in his statement that they wanted him because he was american in this affidavit they they want him as an air traffic controller the fact that he worked for the government was a run for them similarly petition politics were iraq because they were just trying to recruit this guy mr wilkens so that's politics were really in consequential for the government then they were just concerned with her undercut by a crucial factor her two sons remained in guatemala and that's clear from the record in fact she specifically says yes i left my two sons back in guatemala now the group was allegedly threatened to kill both her and her her children her two sons however she abandoned her children and fled the contrie or left the country because she said that it would be too risky or too dangerous for them to travel with her now when we're talking about her children nine hundred ninety five her sons were twenty and sixteen which is more dangerous for her to for thirty eight year old woman to leave the country for the united states accompanied by her two practically adult sons or for the horror to leave them behind in guatemala where they've been specifically threatened according to testimony by grows with death and petition alleges that grows are everywhere so that not only undercuts her professed fear but it also puts against her allegation that the threat posed to her body grows was real she says it's more dangerous for them to go through the united states with her than to remain in the country where there are allegedly threatened by girls with that his statement which is that page one twenty one of the administrative record that he too was constantly threatened with death by quotation threatened with death by the guerrillas or he didn't slay you remain in his job for three more years until he retired and we got to keep in mind that he was the specific target of the gross but he never west managed to stay there and apparently has remained untrouble mistreating her too she says that life was hard and three she mentions the growth however governments notes that she's going to run a plea emphasizing the third factor the growers because that's your line that will entitle her submitted and left and that's one of the problems with this record is that they didn't get the process that was doing her secondly and neutrality is recognized as part of the in computer political opinion  not only would she not ask not only would she not help the girl as she would not even ask her boyfriend to help them they could impute of political opinion that he works for the government she's pro government you know there doesn't need to be a note saying i'm