records and be able to meet with the doctors and other things that she would not have been able to do without the guardianship and there were various skirmishes back and forth that the case went to trial in front of to have guardianship which is henry mr ryan on behalf of his client dan mchenry filed this appeal and i'm going to briefly respond to his arguments that he made in his brief as to sure made the point at the very beginning before any testimony or witnesses from testimony was taken he wanted to make sure that all counsel were on the same page as to the standard that it was going to apply and we all agreed it including the judge that that statute said what it said that the selection of the guardianship and its question there was no dispute over whether chase needed a guardian chase young man on the autism spectrum it was very clear to everybody and the proper physicians reports were submitted documenting that he did have a discretion would be found only where the truck where its ruling is arbitrary fanciful on reasonable or whether the judge acted without the employment of conscientious judgement and in determining whether there's an abuse of discretion this court and that substitute its judgment and say this is what we think should happen or work and it even determine whether the trials courts discretion was actually size wise so if even person would have decided the case as judge sure yes now you have the advantage of reading the transcript of the judge's room when he took an hour and forty minutes to summarize the testimony that he consider to be important he says he stated at the very beginning that he was guided by the law he stated that he was a very obsessive judge in the sense of wanting to review all the evidence which he had done came when he started the summation he said he had lots of evidence in this case to predicated decision on because after all there were three days of testimony with eleven  submissions showed that he strongly considered each piece of evidence each witness he did not discuss each piece of with each witness or each piece of evidence but he certainly considered them and  mation he spoke about the pieces that he thought more were so what did come out in the testimony it came out that we had a mother who had been involved in choose this life since that little boy was diagnosed with autism with being on the autism spectrum at approximately the ages she at one point when he was that age believe that he was having seizures the behavior trisha knew who that idea she took it upon herself to find a doctor in lake county illinois that dealt with kids on the autism spectrum that had epilepsy disorders she on her own initiative took him up there had that yes chase was having seizures put him on medication and by two thousand he was c seizure free she fought with the school district in peoria to have a one on one aide in the school itself to be with chase she learned and became trained in a method of the applied behavior analysis which which starts with the very basics for sure and with autism disorders such as how to sit in the chair so because if you if that child and that set in a chair quietly he or she is not going to be able to benefit at school she was the one who learn about that method and who trained not only the one on one of the aides that she had coming into her home of coming into the school she treated teachers and jaysus educational process in that method she worked with so that they would both be hitting the same kind of disciplinary measures with them and the same kind of praise that he would get she had chased evaluated by national experts she actually formed a group of parents of course who are in peoria he was working in a supportive living facility for elderly and disabled persons basically working in the dining area and this was competitive employment it was not any kind of supported a high school students he showed no interest in his autism disorder he they had vacations and visitation and things like that and i'm not in any way saying that and  love chase but and terms when you contrast that with all of the almost superhuman things that worry me henry did were chase of which even the program sessions except for one when chase was little he did start attending those by conference call when she's was in high school but and this testimony and that of his expert witness at the trial were all when he was asked about what kind of plan was to you hamper chase well his response was i've assembled a team of experts and as soon as we get chased to florida and hand in the valuated we can put in place mchenry was living that plan from the day that that child was diagnosed she was looking for every possible educational advantage for him in high school she was looking for every very well disagree and think that he should have been chosen as the guardian you cannot say that that was an arbitrary decision by john sure where that no reasonable person would read that would have come to the same  a few words about his other argument he mr mchenry through his attorney has accused judge sure being biased against him now under the laws put forth by the and when i he has the burden of proving judicial bias his reason for alleging bias is because after the trial was all over and judge sure was actually retiring and did retire there was an article in  disclose this to us and therein lies mr ryan's claim prejudice by us that he did not disclose this well i will point out that mr bryan misspoke in his brief where where he took that article and said this shows that judge sure had a disabled daughter who died at home and those words at home were never listed in the f died without stating any names you know who told him this or anything like that and for mr ryan didn't know about this i didn't know about this just sure i read did not submit disclose th obligated to say i am divorced and i have three children and my ex husband and i went through a contested custody case no one is a judge who sits in traffic court obliged to say well hey i got three traffic tickets in the last year you know does that show by us i don't think so there's all sorts of personal situations and i quoted from a case people versus tide not because it has any precedential that you have because it said so much more eloquently than i could about the person so that the things that go into forming any human be and certainly judges are human beings and that all of the things in their life have impacted on them one way or the other and that you cannot say that just because this person had this experience in their life prejudice and that you know i won't believe that anymore to say i can't remember the exact quote but i just thought it was such an eloquent statement saying that judge just you know the most that judges can be expected to do is to recognize that they may be biased and she put that aside in divide that divide decide the case that is before them as best they can and if they don't think they can be objective and they're obligated to recuse themselves ok so i know i'm willing to answer any questions you might have