and not the offense in that attorney nation must be made with the understanding and recognition that juvenile offenders are inherently more likely to change that adults have committed the same offense that's exactly why people versus  are supreme court rejected a narrow reading of miller and instead held that juvenile defendants may not be sentenced to life without parole unless the judge has first considered miller factors and as this court recently recognized in people versus molly miller are relevant here first prospects for rehabilitation the record in this case provides that the probation officer believed he recommended that mr les be given counselling for anger management that is affirmative  total background who was involved with the peer pressure and related to games all of these things and it shows that he's not the cold blooded you know monster that he was argued to be by the state an be without proper findings there about proper consideration of you i listen to think that the next doctor is involvement in the homicide that took over everything in this case and it's understandable because in  we also know a confidential informant told police that lesbian his friends were out looking to steal a car when they happened upon mishaps open garage door and then they happened to find her open door and things took a terrible turn that does not evidence a considered plan from the mind of a monster it evidence is stupidity perhaps in your problems all of these things that we've seen in likely from the probation officer speaking with the state not for mr laws these knowledge so all of this together will also be have found that when mr levy was ten he moved from chicago to joliet and he went back to chicago for a year at the age of the opportunity for release will be accorded to those who demonstrate the truth of miller's central intuition that children who commit even heinous crimes are capable of seems the circuit court in this case should agreement leave for mr levy to file am not mistaken i believe this court has a number of occasions all the climb to drugs whether or not the petition adequately set forth causing prejudice age and the determination of irreparable corruption i don't know maybe you need to take this case to the u s supreme court and ask oh we can deal with this what they say that oh no i understand his best efforts he was not able to work out what the supreme court was going to require and so it has to go back so that he can or she can make a decision based on the factors that th mind because it comes up again at the sentencing hearing i want you to read the full sentencing hearing because you want to point out the very beginning of the year when defense counsel objected to the high volume of victim impact letters this is a terrible offense but then i think you are everything that was considered that council discussed is only considered through this lens of what was occurring at the time that this was all aggravation it's just that things have changed and now we know that it has to be considered as mitigation we also know that there is out into the peer pressure when there is a gang activity that's like automatic peer pressure and i know that that's something that's difficult for a lot of us who don't live in not world