conducted this stuff from quitman violation which was christie not having a white above the license plate on her older model and what transpired at the scene of that traffic stop from the point at from this point of the stuff or one thing i would like the court to know and take into account of this appeal is that there was no body in this stop there was no on board they asked him you know office chrissy she testifies that they were back and forth over whether or not she could get out and take a look for his son so under that scenario the mom points behavior could be described as only conditionally refusing these cases i mean there are cases that the well the defendant do seem to be a hothead didn't seem like he was afraid he was he was on the get out the officer this is not the same twenty one year old female rivera this is or not is the heart of this and the jury was not even given the head element of his shoes instruction at the stage show that she wasn't justified or nor was the jury given the standard instruction on what saw the becomes understanding isn't and other cases by this quarter was the officer excessively forceful so did the jury want to decide when the officer was excessively forceful you know it heard her and the same and it's proven it really is only addressing the question of whether the defendant should have been convicted in spite of her searching that she was defending herself again that is not the argument i make this is not a reasonable doubt argument the standard for whether a jury instruction must be given doesn't look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the state the standard instruction here is the sign to make sure the jury gets to decide the disputed factual issues in the case account oh the defendant who testified it would appear i would put my stuff in the position of a bad person you are stuck supposedly for not having a working life most of us don't work at night every time you get in you look at it you know if you look at both parties testimony here the cop offered to release her on an i pod she refused to sign the company except that absent then you're going to come to the station to arrange a cash bond she still refused to sign it i said get out of the car she matters of extreme nuance but imagination your honor i believe i'm fairly stating it and i'm wrong on the defendant's brief in this regard and i have no complaint with his brief he set forth the facts fairly and honestly but when stirred then he says when he he repeatedly said it she stared forward and said nothing she does she says nothing to refute that he said she was under arrest open the door to move or grab her left wrist and her ponytail to get out of the car she said not to touch or in one for not resist including self defense to awful you to a lawful use of force by the officer true she said the cop got educated that's no evidence of excessive force true she said he cursed those are mere words there was never used more force than necessary to make the arrest and that is our position ergo the judge did not abuse his discretion in saying there is no self defense  his hands into the car on lock it open the door grabbed my left side my left side your left side where my arm grab your left arm then what happened i was scared so i did pull back and the person in the room she got enough neck grant then her pony