mooted by the actions and conduct of an immigration judge i believe that the judge has discretion did not find you lose credibility with any legitimate nexus to reason to do so when she had her interview on where credible fear was she didn't mention anything about a three month period of torture and persecution or the severity of it and it can't be said that it was just poor translation or a initial bypass because you gave all sorts of details about other kinds of mistreatment at her discretion about her father's death and prior informant was somewhat conflicting addition she just flat out misrepresented whether she had applied for asylum in greece and that that's what all of it i was kind of disturbing when i read her characterizations of these horrible things that were done thor and then i discovered that what it's about is yelling at her and pushing her i think she said she was tortured in wasn't there and wasn't present and didn't go to the hospital or didn't go to the police station or to the security office where he was taken and said well the ospital record says he died on arrival at the hospital and study guide of a heart ambulance and therefore you must not be to five months and he lost his business in the first three five months later that the gentleman went back into the scene security office where he was that he was called this family was called not her or her uncle if he's dead now the government of iraq was the most brutal and why she wrote the letter let me tell you something that i read in the transcript that would have made me think this woman is trying to i think at page he just starting at two eighty three three ever physically harmed by a sense of iraqi government and she says with a simple beating and then i find out from the subsequent questions what she means by simple beating pushing sla insults and then the question i am just talking physical harm no there's nothing so it's pushing and slapping that's it pulling me from a chair from my hands for instance gee whiz if that's what she's calling feeding it means i can accept any of her generalizations that describe what happened to her i always have to find out and then when she's saying she was i think of one point she said she was beaten her quarter in front of her parents and i find out page two eighty five line seven through twelve all she means is they held my hand they dragged me from the room they pushed me t car they took me with them well then that means i can't trust anything this woman says until i find out the exact physical details why yes she uses inflammatory generalizations for things that my  gosh the police and the most civilized countries in the world will greg a person or push them into their car and hold their hands when they do it whether it's in front of their family or not if you have a heated argument with your wife when you make an offensive evidence that judge was talking about isn't there record and the issue i don't understand it to have been disbelieved so there's a question about whether it was support persecution but that's not what she was rejected on and i meant that she was rejected on the ground she wasn't what we're supposed to focus on is whether a substantial basis in the whole record for the finding of lack of credibility if there is a substantial basis in the record as a whole that supports the finding of no credibility then became an independent country yes it's that's perfectly true but as far as i could read in her account she got a job at a five star hotel as a telephone operator and the government said would you please asked to be an agent when she refused for her own principles that's what she was placed in custody for two days i guess a larger problem that has never been to address by the court is the fact that for the convention against torture  who are you where are you then your family what did you do they have a whole record there's a common security office in every neighborhood in iraq there's a bad security office in every neighborhood in iraq they know who the people are we acquired four million documents going to be he's already agreed to have an islamic government here is objecting in our congress but he's already agreed to that and if that happens then there's going to be a wholesale slaughter they're terrified and they're moving out by the hundreds there's no place for  the truth let's just yelling the case that are you you must know enough about the immigration process no that's true thank you appreciate that but i would suggest that the judge really has won ninety one ninety nine dissociate myself for a mess while i occasionally notice who the judge is i don't what i j to say don't know any of them at nevertheless i just applied a whole lot of the facts and so the judges