psych psychological reports and evaluations done but the appeal involves its relatively simple feel and has two parts the first is that the court used its discretion and denying  yes basically the the the argument is that this is this is evidence that wasn't in the mix when he pled guilty that's that was the second part of the argument which were with regard to the motion and now it's kind of the most controversial part on the part that the court zeroed in on and the court didn't expend any time i think the the second part of the argument was basically that during the course of the two evaluations it was logical evaluations of mr shaw involved both of the both the doctor high at the federal forensic psychologist that it brings to the to the table for the first time an assertion that he is has has a compliant kind of personality that he would admit to things just to please the officers who were there and not necessarily because he had actually done something and that coupled with evidence that his codefendant had the opportunity and the motive to to  use it or whether it was a product of a right psychological you you're exactly what the first part of this the whole evidence about just the laws he had known that from the beginning that that's how the case that was certainly in the discovery he knew what his connection the laws so there was no new evidence there as a judge reimer pointed out he knew been to jesse's house when his wife had had a fight but we can't even tell if that was in two thousand and five or two thousand and four and the reality is this case was charged as  can course of conduct beginning in two thousand and three and ending when they came that there were files on his computer for a lengthy period of time even before that summer several days separation and so any evidence regarding jesse laws was not  in fact in the sexual offender evaluation that he had after his his comment was that the evaluator asked him how did you get busted and the comment was the marshals caught one of my friends and he accidentally let it slip and they  hundred i thought i'd gotten rid of it but i ended up saving someone a cd without realizing what it was until there is absolutely no discussion in the sexual offender evaluation done in march completed in may that indicates the doctor thought his psychological can had anything to do with making this up and then if you look at the evaluation that was done by the bureau that actually started in june of two thousand and six he actually does court over there in june of were three different times in there when he details everything that is actually corroborated by what we found on his computer and what we found in terms of the rest of the investigation this is the classic buyer's remorse this is the classic i've pled guilty and e what is interesting about the change is that unlike most other changes the plea you have a long colloquy where the defense talks through his conduct in this change of plea that didn't have the defendant's admission of his conduct was simply i did download possessed child pornography it was a rogue recitation of the statute and the details came out as the court pulled them out of him and even as it was doing that