what they allege happened to them prior april two thousand and seventeen previously taken out home under the st investigation completely a new set of put them in counseling for what they thought was some sexual irregularities the boys touching themselves particularly brandon for ease and so they  abusive touching back a year earlier in june of two thousand and seventeen ha but mr radcliffe testified we did a thorough investigation there was no prior evidence of a hotline no prior evidence of any alleged sexual abuse concerning mother or father from the for his children and so on this so he had nothing except what the children  provided him in august of two thousand and eight teen he visited the children back meyer school and the children he said he showed up or talked to them about good and bad touches and they said that from their parents and therefore he referred it to the two for a c a c interview of kids suck it st was sent to the green county sheriff's office for investigation and they and bathroom i mean this was a how small house lived in by two goals and six children for the children being older than the two for his shoulder and here the case was set for ten o'clock in the morning we we argued the motions until about one thousand one hundred and thirty the state had a number of other things going on we didn't get to any evidence until  trial the case was that a closer courtroom but but my practice certainly is has been a try to estimate how long it's going to take for the state to try the case that determine whether the father he did not ever seeing any evidence of physical abuse or sexual abuse or seeing or hearing children say anything and then my clients will testified i had no other witnesses there so other staff and had a lot of contact with the family and with these children that could have been presented to a jury but the testimony that was submitted at trial well and simply were not allowed to do essentially grant that motion by hearing the motions st so that there was no waivers so i i'm not dissatisfied with that i'm just dissatisfied with the fact that you know i practiced forty two years and i've never i never practice in bonn county but i've never been in a situation where the who are better those who counsel expected to begin try a case of that omissions to continue out the hearing itself however in his motion to continue as you can find in the record did not stay under what basis are part of the statute that he was requesting a continuance under so i believe based on what however i never saw where the court ruled on that fire as they continued with ash hearing before that i believe is when the state actually  certain questions of these witnesses about the two boys brain and jonathan have altered siblings there's four of them have trying to ask questions about abuse allegations that may or may not have happened putting to them every single time  only as it related to what also was connected to bring in john so because the two girls made allegations bringing in john and were also included in that because they were siblings of others who were being sexually abused and however all of those allegations were down and that's why the green county case in general was dismissed and then they did the fine county case but it only pertain to jonathan and brandon the other siblings were not talked about more than the extent of what i just spoke about when explaining why they were mentioned in the st place was because since they were essentially abused for allegedly because they were siblings with the two younger boys that is why for whole parties have to be either appear in court or have received so it's not just not just my client who was one of the respondents so i certainly disagree as to the start of interest of k ole that was cited by a state in that case it's been seven or eight months and there'd been three prior continuances so it was just a completely