is the post foreclosure agreement section two point one prohibits one hospital from taking any action to contest cause the state of or otherwise the latest basing your claim that somehow no in bed now controlling hillcrest can no longer take advantage of a legally prescribed reduction period we believe that at a minimum getting to where you get which is that somehow these parties in an operating agreement have made it impossible for themselves to change their operating arrangement with yours which are pretty is that they somehow bound themselves in a way that made it think so i think these were taken together the amani you had the e u sorry you quite obviously like your client have the right to to negotiate and be specific and how could you tell me how i'm going to conclusions i wish to understand i think i understand the letter of credit every person if you're using the operating tell me how the operating agreement conditions we believe that the entire essence of closure a great read at least half of it had to do with a post acquisition series of behaviors what would happen  watch a story where were mr frank and it he said there was a crummy six ruling judge wilson made some statements about the complaint they were rulings about what the  not she was interpreted to document and she said certain things about what that document meant so what changed in the document between the time she said something about what it meant a judgment not a book that it and said something different look to some of the strategic evidence the circumstances within which the contract was entered into from the first and foremost look to the contract language itself ok when we do that when we look at the contract labor itself for example we look sale that's what they're saying this language means so what is it about that language which is so clear that when looking at that would say what could possibly mean but that responded that stop us from taking this all the way through change of control that is we get them property because in the i don't i don't read the figure can go away which the bet to expand to go as far as to play the claims number one a process we want we want the process of foreclosure we want the process of the sheriff's sale but we do care about the end result how how is that clear from this language because you say and it's clear that that's not in here so it must be that they don't to question we understand the motivation i think they understand the motivations of the one last one of these they were they saw a way out of their problem and they were able to resolve it with in bed and that was good for the hospital and so what was good for the hospital at that point was to sum up within med and transfer control pill quest in bed and read in bed do what it wanted to do to regain the property that's all perfectly right to call that the hostilities who me they say they have a different view of the facts they say they made it clear to you that they didn't want the property and one might understand that assertion so you knew that there was a soaking being discussed whereby the interests hillcrest would be soiled in bed and there was no objection both of the people that testified for liberty bell testified that in no uncertain terms they said they wanted to own the property and  which was a weekly described if your testimony of my clients that they would somehow get paid off i was never there at no point in that conversation is there any evidence that my clients knew were understood which we've quoted on page nine of our reply mr cruz he said and we told him very strongly that we would not be very happy with that and every member said something along the lines that well you're between a rock a hard place because redemption period if in that it can get the financing they can get it how is that consistent with coming in here saying there's no way that could wrongfully happen he turned that said his name is mr michael viscount mr viscount