so when i mean i i don't mean to short circuited this question on the timeline so when he came back after a day off or whatever it was and found that it was being operated with full full four crash and then what happens after they act he was called into the office of the supervisor her name is really fletcher i don't recall her position at the time or she was one of the higher ups in the at the livia and she told him that no i mean this call and i here and he had nothing to do with what northern trust was up to these these illegal or unethical activities that were really specify and certain anyway he had other to do with those at all and so the and so did anybody complain about it because i think i think what that other guy is doing is wrong and the bank will get tired of that for it but then they're nothing to do with that person's duties at all with regard to what he's supposed to do for northern trust whereas this case is because mr cowards his job before he in fact they didn't tell that the specter was coming when it's something that normally do they kept him out of the loop and so he would he have no capacity to do anything for so he didn't refuse to do anything after that conversation with miss watch while he refused to to fire them if you're gay but they have to consult with their with their higher ups in their thirties first how did the inspectors get there was it really scheduled visit or was an inspector summoned to come and look at the activity that question  making it run the correct way steelers are to be both manufactured maintained to operate and these are mandatory things in the purpose of these inventory regulations is to make sure that these things are operating safely best that that is the policy behind the that makes it dangerous environment for a cold to operate then in that case they have to operate in a different way and there are specific standards that say that you can't be operated under if you would cause a directed to be done now the defendant wants to say that well that's not really a public policy because there are no legislative fines and something but there's no case that says that you have to have a separate bill through clearing findings section any laws that executive director told me to do it this way and he said put aside what the executive director told you you need to follow my directions at that point in time he could have call his supervisor the superintendent john carlson and said why are you moving in this direction you could call the executive director and said why are we moving in this direction instead when he decided it wasn't he was the ultimate decider for the partitions policies and operations and that he could countermand override that manner the executive director is the person who is charged with making the final decisions about the park district's operations and you also see it wasn't quite that way wasn't it didn't they attempt to fix it but the wrong parts came and this is maintained he initially said well i think we should just get some whiners carlson said let's get a whole new deal so they took it seriously new order a whole new deal before they began operating near full capacity they did go out and inspect it again to make sure that generous seventeen okie dokie first reported this many days before and it was being complied with and they did order parts but the wrong parts came and so they just decided to go ahead anyway until requirement of a clearly mandated public policy is essential in the supreme court said general notions about public safety and public health care are not sufficient all statutes so where other