completely changed his story from coming to the united states because he is christian and these being guyana because he is jay at the border interview he was asked why he left gonna and he answered that quote the muslim group chased me out of my house in the night unquote the blitter patrol officer never recorded the motives of that group it was only the i j a coast soon that the name muslim gro travel out because i was a muslim and i became a christian and that was why i left the country apart you reconcile that with the statement of the credible fear interview your honor again at the credible fear entering the united states and so i came here because i have friends and they told me america is good and it was christian but the officer never asked why did you flee and that why did you flee is the basis of an asylum claim and that question was never asked by the assam officer and so when it was asked by the other excuse me by the border patrol officer so when it was asked by the sound officer and the i j a the supplemental information cannot be counted against him threats after becoming a christian yes i went through it when i was young my space was sprayed with pepper i tend to disagree with you that that isn't a response as to my space was sprayed with pepper because i was christian if that's the way we go what is what is your other argument as to why that shouldn't be decisive so it's secure so that ability finding those so your your answer is that if you disagree with me on the christian and he said yes i was i was pepper sprayed in the eyes i had hot peppers in my eyes and he was asked is so he answered he was attacked after becoming christian but he never was asked whether it because of his christianity or whether he was ever persecuted on his religion when he was asked have you ever had to live just problems and by the asylum officer he said no so when there's a clarity and communication that was is inconsistency here for instance is it possible to be persecuted both because you're a christian and also because you're gay and if you've only one of those answers meaning because of my christianity an adverse credibility finding and i'd like to direct the court to to all seven which are the only four questions that the border patrol asked under the under the law they are suppose to ask why did you leave do you have any fear are you  and you have any questions yet they meet that initial threshold then they refer to are trained asylum officer who sits down with them to actually look into the have the merits of their some claim determine whether they should go forward or not ever upheld an adverse credibility on demeanor of bone even if you disagree with one of the points on the traditional path when the court upholds a demeanor finding there's something in the record supported and s actually noted on the record that the person literally jumped out of their chair and juan the record reported the pauses and hesitations was reported in the transcript and even in mainz when the transcript not point to that  sweating so are you saying that not enough that it should have been annotated as the common relaxed demeanor was shown during when sweating started well in s six credible fear interview for example of thirty two he says i thought her and his siblings put peppers in my eyes and they say that i don't worship they told me that i don't when and why they told me that i don't go to service and i am gay so doesn't that support that the petitioner was saying for example a spotter and his siblings put peppers in his eyes both because he was christian and because he was gay black came here he also made a statement i came to america because my friends told me it's a good place and also because i'm christian that's why i came that was other council but the question at two o three was where did you name in what country and he said i used that name in guyana because to travel out because i was muslim and i became a christian and that's why i left the country you know i don't read that as an ambiguous lee say that that was the only reason he left the country so that that can be used as a as a finding that he not credible ok but then he furthermore like i like i mentioned earlier he all of them what's your one and what is your purpose for coming to the united states that is because of the christian country my friend told me america is good that's why i came and then why did you leave your country the muslim group chased me out of the house in the night the less formal or better interview and the reason i suggest that is it seems to be the basis for the immigration judge finding that statement later that may seem to be supplementing interpreter he didn't have any question about what was happening during the interview he signed that the statement at the end he swore to the accuracy of the contents there can be i mean it's a reliable document on top of that from government  we're working on it just a panic hopefully it be just another minute or two ok all right and that's ok where the court said that it has the data to be a statement given during airport interviews as valuable impeachment sources because of the conditions under which they were taken however in that case the id heard evidence from the immigration officer who interviewed the alien at the airport about procedures used to ensure that the interview was accurately recorded and understood and we have those procedures here i think i mentioned earlier that the airport in her brother the border interview said i came here because i have friends here and they told me america is good and that is why i came and also because it is a christian country that is why i came so how is that intense system i was coming to america because it's good inconsistent with the petitioner also being concerned about being persecuted because he's gay as well as being their christian so how is that inconsistent with him later saying i was persecuted the middle of the night right i don't we don't we have a don't we have to work with the question is the question is what is your purpose for attempting to enter the united states i came here because i have friends here and they told me america is good how is  inconsistent with him later saying and i was persecuted in guyana because i was a as well as being christian has a duty to suspend it didn't compete because he later said that he was not at all farmed a persecuted on account of his religion during where d i guess i'm wondering where in the us transcript you think that he would have said that if it were true i mean he could have if they're referring to the border interview he could have for that   his being gay during his credible fear interview but at the bottom of one knock on to a to have you with your harm or threats by a family member who my father and his siblings put peppers in my eyes and they say i don't worship why they told me that i don't go service and i am so it's not true that he never said during his credible fear interview that he suffered no harm because he was gay and for that he chere however he doesn't mention that the problem is he never mentioned the fact that he's gay and that he has all the bases of the persecution claim now is that it's a p s g based on gay men from guyana putting words in his mouth that th from the muslim volunteer group who he described as an antique a group now there's no reason why he didn't he hasn't ever explained why he never mentioned any of that part of his claim at the border interview when he was asked to explain the discrepancy during the marriage hearing by the way why did you did you say that you were gay during the boardroom of the group that yes i told i told the officer he was asked that same question different ways would it surprise you to find out that that interview