MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
is the fact that the board failed to acknowledge the a j or fail to acknowledge or address the circumstantial evidence which was attendant to the film the fact that the search warrant the fact is that this this charge this search was was if you look at the search for very questionable and based not on s of judge found facts to be completely to the contrary what happened to start the criminal proceeding which is i think what you are is asking about was that one in late summer probably about ten or fift end to the indefinite suspension and there was here because the agency said as soon as the criminal proceedings are turning we're going to reassess and see where we are what happened in this case is that he had already retired before the criminal proceedings and so there was no there was no reason to come to that point that reassessment was never done because his retirements fex weighted in december of two thousand and five retroactive to december of two thousand and three in the criminal proceedings at the trial not terminate those charges mooted by the grand jury indictment are they removed by the grand jury indictment how much is the grand jury indictment pipe dream the charges mr thompson is making about activities before the indictment brief following the hearing proceedings below but this court's decision in sanders versus united states postal service eight zero one second thirteen twenty eight pages thirteen thirty one
not use the exact words legitimate business interest test isn't correct in all of these early cases and even up through ante what the supreme court did injuries to the public because the new urge him to promise or and whether the restrained him who is is greater than is necessary to protect the privacy so there's no there's nothing in any of those cases  but keep in mind it's not just crap when they sell only our systems you know it's a system that goes in three story building and it's part of it is the product the actual physical thing it's sort of like building a for a different job from a different customer a reliable opinion this is this is why we believe the trial for employment agreement and in correctly pointed out this to all the testimony in the november bench trial it was not made clear who these two parties actually agreed on were going to be the customers and so the trial was concerned about damages for any activities so the plaintiff presented no evidence of competition and as a result there were no actual damages your honour's directing your attention to impression after sundown this is a case of absolutely no evidence so we do not have to get to an analysis of the time territory restrictions and we do not have to get to analysis of the legitimate business interest test that relationship doesn't end just because of a particular job it's the same way that a piece informs a relationship with a doctor he wouldn't say well then the asian should be used because their patient visit relationship formed there and that's why those customers come back to reliable through the sales people because they've come to rely on them they've done business with them they've got a good product and service and so it doesn't building so these things need to go in on time they need to go in right they need to be done properly if someone gets a move forward for a project that gets banned service from the liable they're not going to come back on so yeah chris is certainly things that go into the building that are working relationship so that if you do have a stream of business from those customers so yet doesn't resent driven completely by price and it doesn't end just because the project is and those are the relationships th other instances there are so directly to a building on them so it depends on what the relationship is but again we're talking about everything defined by the nature of the business community and say you don't have to define
plan under the exchange now miss harman miss harman no i so that's what that's why up i respectfully oppose the second
motion directed against the judge so basically you're arguing and let me make sure i understand your argument no matter how i label it for with them the appropriate time period court has to consider there but we have the right to in essence say the court was wrong in its determining its lack of authority and still determined that it was right in the sense had the ability to determine whether or not it was a proper motion to reconsider or whether or not it followed sixty five b one and
perfected so at the time measure first took care of the case there was no understanding that sever that any of this had happened and in fact for the next year of litigation the partners believe that the  clients and certainly the words not the practice were not included in the release and there weren't any discussions of the testimony from all the parties involved was clear that there wasn't any discussions about malpractise that that release was  then mechanics think complaint was filed by pinnacle and i may twenty third of the two that's correct they believe or was representing kind construction second trick search on december nineteenth up to three and they didn't withdraw it is construction systems attorney in the case until august of zero three were yes so between the time that they knew that they eighth two for so between december of zero three and august of zero three were this really a client relationship with construction systems yes there was still the case of representing them and they'd and they didn't say oh wait there's a problem she just relied upon the work that was performed by federal labor i mean that's the purpose what that labor was the tape in this case this best represented construction systems prior to this case and on a the construction systems and there is nothing in the record that i have seen between the second trick search when fadal neighbor discovered cosmopolitans interest that was all black  case with any case if the have committed malpractise i wouldn't have prevailed and i would have recovered x amount of money if if it's a mechanic's l therefore th go all the entities he's dealing with and these alternative arguments just an attempt to salvage whatever construction systems he permits we i don't think so and to try to reason stand on it is
plaintiff dr michael kohler who was in court
to clean out i guess the right road coming through new towns will be opening up new settlers moment to buy land so i just thought i'd let you know that i'm dealing i think we all believe  quit i'd fight and go but if you figure on quickly i want to make sure you keep your mouth shut or don't worry i talk and no i don't think you will you know
they are dr three nurses having you like during your time with dale and then he came here you had a chip on his shoulder and ever since he's been waiting for somebody to step up and knock it off well he still waiting making days are over oh combination  i'm all right i'm sure oh we got to help that leading we'll think about it already i'm sorry it won't work out that way jack died a few minutes ago you never recovered consciousness you never come back it's your wrong daley's coming back for we pounded necessary to suppress the news of jackpots that evening papers are carrying a story to the effect that he confessed in clear i understand there's nothing you've started to help what you don't seem to understand is that your personal opinions on mine are useless in the face of the evidence against him he didn't have anything to do with that prison break we can prove that no law can goober those fingerprints on a combination lock what they see on hands and tie every man who could testify so much has happened to both of us came here has been a lot easier if we hadn't seen each other in the hundreds of them i have to tell you how i felt about something i'll never forgive myself
regardless of what the phrase all for me you stated during the wee hearing in this case it was not but regardless of whether it is who are not suitably so defendants with guilty for reasons other than the question of guilt or really he could have simply made his findings in the record and not direct me to put it in writing and if even you could have done as well again i didn't want to to offer any that's true your honor but then he didn't specify exactly what it is they should have put in order and i did not want to engage the judge in these pacific question about what he wanted i presented him with the record the biggest contradiction in the records the day that is of course defendants plead guilty which i argued extensively for the trial court and here is the basis excuse me as an admission of his guilt the defendant pleaded guilty the court system treats that as defense burke according to the statute and i believe the case law to then present evidence to the trial judge that he lacks culpable negligence in other words that it wasn't his fault that this isn't timely and so i don't think it's my burden to show that i'm going to get this
judge and then it came back to her so there was i think an appellate review and then it came back correct quick the first time she was before the score he was before this court why didn't he record indicate that mission to the sure it is worthless because they cannot cure the lack of fish to face confrontation we accept you would recognize another case on it's clear the right to face to face confrontation under the constitution and ongoing in the federal government glue fuming is a distinct methodology that is the combination that is and should have been review and fry hearing in order to hear this combination was a methodology for th facts what happened below and i read a second fax and i read the first issue and i thought to myself the medical problem here looks like this particular defendant made some disrespectful destructive comments the trial judge this appears to bend  in the presence of the jury what is your response to van does it make it a little bit different because it wasn't a situation where he was in front of the jury when this happened he seems to be saying should he have had the chance to see his behavior for war over and over and over and over again during the very seasons where he was removed and it was only at the west door that he was moved in this particular instance given more than twice that if you're not if you don't stop one hundred forty trillion one hundred forty trillion seven billion people on the earth twenty thousand earth is over forty trillion so one out of the population of twenty thousand earth is the ratio here
of deposition that was presented at trial and we know that instructions that are given to the jury is about inference and they do they are just coming from those injuries and in this case it is you can see from the actual issue of the direction that was submitted to the jury caused him to have filed that lawsuit so so your position would be the first time he goes to the doctor but when you buy this back and says my work is what's causing this that triggers the running the space issue and that was the decision that you discussed perhaps the first time what the statute of limitations should be not through a traumatic one time injury before you lose your occupation or seize such as this
as well and it was the other standing when he told me that was the case he was he was given to understand differently in august ninety five days was requests for information
and in fact in the district court ordered them to get it done by the end of this year i think you have to look at the th circuit's purposes in the context of what it means for the fishery the court said  what jurisdiction this court has to step in well you know the process along the way doesn't look like it's going to reach the right result we'll hear from the government and they can explain to us whether it will or whether a w but even if it were designed to do that tellers i only agency action i don't understand how we have jurisdiction to do that i mean that would be really unusual if the court were allowed to get in and dictate well and you if you're right if you're right then we will slap them down but we're not going to do it to this vital agency x is not how it works that's that's not there that's not the no interim there's no interim f m p if you will d or no interim plan out how to proceed no they just let this do what it will be free and that's unfortunate and c which are all federal waters those are waters between three in two hundred and ninety shake there several management rather than state management at both federal and state law make conservation paramount prioritize subsistence fishing that is i need alaskans and both promote and balance the different uses within the issue commercial fishing is one of the uses in the national interest but so too is the economic and recreational benefit local communities and this includes guidance for what we call personal use fisheries which means the runs are low commercial fishermen aren't the only ones impacted by regulatory restrictions there's also restrictions and fisheries there's also restrictions on personal use issues now i mention these things because plaintiffs are giving court a very skewed picture of the purpose of the man's net and the purpose of state law in a very limited view of the public interest when asking for the extraordinary remedy to really know regarding the legal issues you're precisely right there's no jurisdiction to not be entitled to an injunction anyway nor would court management of the fishery be appropriate minging cook inlet is complicated there are multiple runs each i type of salmon in cook inlet it's often impossible impossible excuse me for commercial fisherman to discriminate between certain types of sand that means that when you give plaintiffs and more opportunity to catch one sack of fish that maybe could it be ok with more interception that necessarily gives plaintiffs the opportunity to catch you shouldn't be constrained by political boundaries when you do your m p full of fish and that's exactly were asking for here you have m p s so music covered the entire fishery to fish where they go what's the point of conservation management measures if they end when fish get in site three miles what's the point of famishing anyone kathlyn it for maximum sustained yield if all of that can be undone once the fish inside state waters question is once a final agency action is brought would you challenge it under the madison act or under the a p a or under balls under both your honor and is there any difference in the rules that can be challenged
available for his regular use and we just don't know from the record how often he did it we only know of one well two occasions when he used it we know that he used it occasionally when he was doing odd jobs for the family businesses we don't know how often that happens the testimony is unclear on point  record both of them do identify specific automobiles that's what makes them all if you're not a policy it identifies a particular car or maybe maybe more than one car every word available broadens the exclusion so i submit that these facts show that it was available for his regular years the ones i mention the fact that he was authorized to use it if nobody else was using it he just had to ask permission for no they say that while the fact that he had said ask permission i'm essentially negates any notion that it was available for his available for that person's regular years would be absurd i would be absurd but that's on this case obviously this is not any personal in any car this was james blacks car that sean's dad lived with and the car still regularly available in say the answer i believe it was just this week dave posed the question is there any evidence that he ever asked for permission to use the yukon and was told no i didn't see any such
how you just can't get here from  so we should talk to them prepared for whatever the next disaster and we have a lot of great volunteers and i think the reason we did so well with irene is the people that we relied upon to do their jobs did their jobs if you're going to do this is the first meeting you really need to be a good date time at least once in the next three weeks three weeks is as far as i want to go es yeah
and  and this is kind of the some asian of the of the demographic study and that is that this is your current situation here and these there that seems to make sense and clearly no matter what you decide to do it will be ready this year or next year or so and pick something that's like two or more years out in regards to this desi where folks are going to have a conversation with john and i in the near future to try to pin that number down more specifically it is really never going to have anything lined up on this specific number alternative a massive plan the scaffolding of the weirdest describe the status quo is to say it's asset protection that means you're preserving your assets as a building but you're not improving anything in regards to did you know that if you do something now twenty years later he's still got something that's pretty soon that is that you're probably not going to spend two years because of the way it's written on over time and proposing any additions but they're certainly understand that there are still issues in the building and there's certain percentage of extra space reconfiguration that that would have to do with the existing footprint so that that's the added cost that  and then you have everything in between to essentially solve it in the middle school and for the most part most of the districts issues probably for twenty or more years probably enough for sale tax rates are relatively stable and increasing so the likelihood of getting immigration for a few people looking for cheap real estate
like he then what you put back in your belt that goes down with a chest that's we starts all clear no favors some of us don't get back it'll be that much easier for them is done question me on again would join a rip you from  rest in peace time to be out next time be away well well well what have we  that i'm keeping you from your dinner you have valid doing it see the captain employed me to make in s we're too far out for me to swim back if i can give service to you said the captain send you here yes why he wants to know who or what you are saying who do they think i am twelve apostles why the twelve apostles on the other hand on the other hand what since a man doesn't exactly grow rich in the king's pay crooked row so you have your price how much an equal and if you do share mr king's informa what guarantee is that you want still turn evidence in the crown if i go in with you i mean equally guilty and if we are caught we hang together but i can keep you from being about this who knows we might be useful to each other when they in one way or another to forgotten something wearing so i  for well you might better belong with those powers you for a few days ago all i really know is they do not include jill get out you are you doing on this my father was killed i'm accused of piracy a few people believe what plane the king did that's why i want to see him turn power three years ago that's why i'm sure i knew that someday i'd come upon the truth might this be perhaps a man that asked too many questions this is yours come back for me yes or he did into running away with him and catching him red handed in defensively long i was forced to this patch and the rest in peace tell me captain about the then how do you explain this
suppose i'm jealous of the which no one to stop  i i didn't suggest today do you mean you know mr and mrs jones please please help me help what can i do for that process so just he's just yelling stuff and they get the number just is just as sacred to them as yours is it's all right we look after your kids yes yes
for quite some time we had two paces going on one in jersey county that is jersey hospital another one in madison county after it been transferred to see their jersey hospital is part of the story there where that is where the how they support your honour's this one said anything that changes the argument and the result should happen in this case based on what i said earlier again immunity for the issues not right which is not right that there is no absolute rule against holding municipal corporations responsible for medical negligence the michigan avenue national bank cases we cit and so this idea is automatic that upon going to jersey county the case will be dismissed against jersey hospital doesn't hold up under the law and pronounce fires green for when it comes to the question the record and what's in involved when you have medical providers involved you have to take that into account but again that's all outside of the situation we are here where you have a man or even there where jersey hospitals in this case they were  and it doesn't matter who the attorney one of us for whatever reason it was filed against or the hospital the reason being important for the story that's where the shop birth was treated that's when she was fearful for fifteen months and that's where a number of
it's so nice to see you are you here this afternoon and we're so excited to play for you what you're going to see this afternoon is our school chamber orchestra it's about twenty students are full orchestra the high schools not sixty five so this is that their care up and we're really saying that they are you were really playing a mix of music that we've been working on throughout the year this school year and so you're going to see that our musicians sometimes in between pieces are going to switch seats because throughout the year way or and this was one of our favorites from last weekend