panic attack that mr kern suffered in the king county jail in january twenty ten the rest of the case the fact that mr khan believes that he's suffering from post traumatic stress disorder is dispositive in this case the overwhelming evidence shows that he did mr curry was not well at the time he was panicked in the chill when he thought it made was going to attack him he was suffering from depression anxiety the symptoms go back a long time at least twenty five maybe even before then can we know what most of us would consider a nonevent when i in me begin to scratch his fouling the finger printing incident do it was related to this preexisting condition but did any of the doctors a pine with reasonable degree of medical certainty that the panic attack actually worsen the condition soon he was suffering from depression anxiety and he reacted in an extreme way to a prisoner scratching his head i don't know justice you know something to make the point that this case seems to be about the difference between subtle that it may be injury versus the s on and there were restrictions that were put on his i'm on his duties and the police department would not accept that so they sent the police department sent mr kern to his own to their own doctor and that doctor said that preexisting condition and that's why he had reacted so strongly in the jail to what was really a nonevent for somebody who was healthy i don't i don't recall a case similar to this where the problem of problem was related to difficulties there may or may not have been brought about by a something that took place during a procedure or an incident that would game be somewhat more of a risk some of the cases the talk about the police officer the fellow out of his chair in the office of the station remember that yes i do yes go to the point is that there are cases that say that yes there are police officers who are injured but it's not in the line of duty because we wish to be for she does not his hand and never recovered to the point that he could do police work and the court in that case said it's the crux of the capacity that should be noted in determining whether an officer is given a line of you barber out of yourself barry to me officer was involved in what was you know someone to whom it was really a minor traffic accident in the same thing and he had a preexisting condition and the squad car i don't think the i don't think the motorists who if you read the facts don't think she's the mortars who hit the squad car was traveling at a high rate of speed but for some reason this triggered injuries  in the officer it's caused by or related to a preexisting condition and the officer was not able to return to d of you know a healthy person he overreacted he was just over stimulated and that is more now by the record in the easy to get as a as a real threat stick statement that his wife insisted that he stay home he couldn't he couldn't function he i think he called up work on three times and then  doctor who thought that he was that he recovered out to the point that he could return to duty but dr a ball ski can show up both said that he was not ready to or he was not well enough to go back to police work where this mental disability manifested itself i believe it was in january fifth twenty ten when when he panicked in the jail  and was not able to return to duty well i'm looking for much earlier in time what i'm suggesting is that the panic attack came about current was not well enough to return to duty and that he suffered from an id in the fact that mr kerr could not return to his job after experiencing a panic attack in the jail shows that his conferred pension in order to get a line of duty disability pension to point to a specific identifiable police duty that cost of that condition generalized anxiety cause observing the violent nature of things the police officers are exposed to is insufficient and there's a lot of public cases both in this district as well as your sister and brother districts across the state that hold the same thing in this case not only is there a psychiatric disabilities are treated differently than traditional physical injuries one to the cases cited by counsel rose of the bar holder physical injuries as well as there was evidence in the record to prove that they symptomatic is reasonable based on the record for the compassion board to conclude is not the fingerprinting instead it is a mis perception of threat which is not the police work in fact is something that commonly officer it's due to the fact that i have a mental condition that has nothing to do with my police judy's moreover the language other than the record makes it very clear based upon the expert evidence that was presented that the case however you are under supreme court as well as your own press and by the media trust weight standard as such in light of the arguments that i've made in our brief i won't belabor the new further i ask if you have any questions otherwise i function and have any of the efficiencies from by which the purpose of their creation is made is for them to be affirmed that their trusted to make judgments based upon how to interpret differing evidence and in this and he overreacted in the jail that is called an extreme panic attack he was never able to return to duty well to the stage between those two cases is the manifestation of the injury for the police officer with it he was brought on by his duty and the testimony was that this panic attack could have been brought out by anything almost anything was not necessarily to the related record well after some substance of the medical testimony of the expert