MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
probably getting them to win that road beo race say she should win that five thousand dollars not a chance i am writing for daughter you know go if you're tired then why don't you just lie down why that girl can sure do things without a burner female buffalo bill now you see what makes it worthwhile wait a minute that's the sure of let's see  on behalf of the road day or so she asian and its members to which we all belong i hand you this money for you to worry about you're the official treasurer anyway so after that fine you better give it to me so there's five thousand dollars carry helen that's a prize money you'd better count it oh i know it's all there it's practically mine anyway because you see i'm going to that right yeah durn took me you are gal we're all rooting for you helen thank you boy thank you fifteenth and k i promised myself that i was going to show my appreciation by trying to become a real west like you you know honey i didn't learn those things back east in school you can't learn to ride and shoot in the day it takes oh boy a home cooked meal always hungry well come on let's go on is that for now well i guess it's up to me to answer a few questions you tell me as much as you want know and now that i'm a fugitive it doesn't make things any simpler and when can we help you oh why couldn't you get mixed up in all this one of us worry about that well i would feel a lot braver about it i guess you can do the talking for both of us all right you want the two of them back but i still don't get it i know you've been playing around with the rich you're not very smart the oil you want something i get tough about winding up in a jam i want something but i play the game my own what i have a couple of spots now and we're doing all right what's on your mind now i don't put your two men out of trouble for nothing in the first place i didn't think was a good idea to let that rich girl bust things wide open and in the second place i figure
and the brought a little bit more space for boutros ism because you have all the possibilities even though more active uses his flute with a mouthpiece or wood so it sounds lighted traditional one but he uses many kinds of he decided to make his solo career he became one of the most important musicians on till nowadays and you can notice that with
on a cross reference yes i would just add to what you said if you if he gets the cross reference and he gets know as so cs and not what just but since still over the statutory  argument is that he was not foreseeable to him that violence could be used by other of his partners is that your best the argument is he did not have to do it but that isn't partners would use violence now he was new he was young he did not he was not involved in train ideas people in fact he stepped on their toes become each other territory and pips but i did find that the otherwise extensive language of this particular advancement makes it applicable to the defendant there is no there is no statement that he organized or led any use them for the organize and lead one participant thought there must be a participant now participant is defined in high doing as a person who is criminally
foundry in this case i think because there's clearly wasn't in one piece fabric with no with no see there's no you there's there's no way and there's really no
service is to follow and if they follow that process which i assume they did then it is simple it is reasonably possible that there are documents that are relevant to the issue of is under a duty to consider those records there is a specific statute on any regulation that obligates be a to keep all federal records on blast they are assured it efforts to get those records would be futile
directv places the system into operation because it impacts it's phone lines directly to the system that's an interesting point it's it's i would compare it to if someone if you call  friend and you have a conversation on whose criticism hating on the call is using the phone system both sides call both sides parties to the call using the phone system in the infringement by stopping using it all it has to do is disconnect the calls because the well west provided it was merely a scout it has no content it has no no agent lest they sell it possibly if they are in fact selling this apparatus i don't know there's no allegations of that but why are they using it the customer is the one making the phone call and initiating the system that nobody ever call not literally using the system because i'm saying that when they test for direct arrangement it's placing the system into operation as a whole and that's what it does and so it's not the customer hire judge moore to make computer chips to sell computer chips to use computer chips for me to write a skate for a belly because i can say she's the one who did it she's my don't think you can say that when the contradiction is independent contractors the only when you can bridge that gap is with an apparent authority argument which i'm not sure if you embrace or not will they they certainly already create those parts of the system directly he did not specifically instruct them to do
number twenty three
what i hope i'm going to give you a film of the new division fourteen doing like us and i'm only going to see if they allow the dog or a fish so i hope you'll get to so i plan on doing today is taking you get with me more and same thing with tomorrow because the days of big events tomorrow you are long term which is what we've practiced for for so when waiting for the team to come out for their spontaneous of leaving please be sure to check that you have all your belongings with you and that you remove any trash that might have a problem because you just saw it in the case of an unexpected alarm the fire exit is right there
what do you think of that drastic just another sourdough advice to smart and the elf oh yes not so much exactly two dollars and sixteen cents animal to go to a stranger yeah you come far far enough and if anyone should ask if i wasn't here and you didn't see what you find out that that's why i keep all these men are one hundred here there are certain people that would do anything to learn that secret slowly this morning the ben discovered a prowler the doctor you mean your brand well i left him back there working out a very naughty problem seems to be nice and comfortable then then you're not one of the well i don't know what you mean but i'm not what the trouble was trying to get down post well you help me you're always ready to help a lady in you haven't asked me why i was running away twice like overtaking me well i sort of figured you'd tell me i got around to it well i'll go i'll tell you all about it i'm that henry and i'm visiting i've got a good mind to let you have it right now you can't hurt anybody with that thing you forgot t you've got the word of the mounted police but it is i'm going to send one of the men down with a message the police tonight and i'll see that you don't get a chance to warn him we five back side i don't mind that now what are you doing on my property and what do you want when i would start looking around for a job and you know i don't know the prospects what kind of a job to expect to find around here i don't know particular in mind and this man taylor what do you know about him what taylor knows about me gives me a headache fifty feet on this line it was what what you want i'm getting ready to go to bed you see anybody coming here i saw somebody going but i see nobody come out you got a right through the heart don't see any bullet holes in the door do you and did you notice the bullet entered from the back well what about it nothing when he was facing this door when he yeah you gotta get away now first thing to do is the find some sort of a weapon
t the exclusion rules don't really define the the universe and that because the statute on its face says included prior to nine hundred seventy five and they were partially eliminated in seventy five in a limited period from the air in eighty five how can we overlook the significance of they had and still get to where he wants to request clarifying language on numerous issues we have limited success in getting your attention we need the world to be a difference here depending on how we might interpret for i don't know exactly how that happened here i believe that some combination of the area is becoming aware of there was some confusion different parents were taking different positions about whether or not they needed to withhold taxes from these payments iraqis their position is that the employer has to pay both parts of the tax their own in the employee no question and so if that's the position that the i compensation but it also has this effect exemptions from compensation and lost wages isn't a model not so if we're if we're looking at the statute as it exists at the first appreciate you letting us know that the supreme court maybe he's having this issue the court is going to take this case under advisement and the court is going to stand in recess for both five minutes
and there's at least what i think may be a significant somewhat of a significant difference between this chart and natural and that is that in the charts in fifty nine zero nine you show a
science not an absolute rule you may prevail because of this the speculation but they do have that one thing going for them but you are i would agree i would agree that that does appear to support their position generally i think it's not crystal it would only prevent resetting of both bad conditions existed whereas it's designed to prevent resetting of either one of the two cadets are just it wouldn't make sense to to design the price that had to happen both in the open and nothing in the permanent injunction would stop the patent terms so describing your client's product on say projections you disagree with that characterization but the made in favor of entering a permanent injunction if the arguments this way that happened was an error written presentation to the judge saying here judge of the reasons why we think a permanent juncture should be entered now this that i find that can just enter an injunction of the terms of this breath without addressing the four critical factors as i understand what is a fourth circuit law you're supposed to do that and i'll be candid with you i don't ok thank you thank
determination that these would be in violation supreme court rule two thirteen the standard view that this court is an abuse of discretion on the would ensure rulings and violations of the supreme court rule two offering opinion with testimony at trial the rule requires the parties timely supplement any of the opinions after the room disclosure or deposition in a general sense with teams through the earlier the better but he went on to say that deposition that he admitted he did not have the expertise to testify about  surgery that had to be done with less chance of avoiding damage to the pelvic or brand new baby and now we're talking about proximate cause ation and damages that he breezily has such an intense and this the treating physicians declined the offer gave him is in this regard unfair the more they know more than they do the declined to offer the opinions because they recognize a simple to complex addition to based on these questions
huge haircut mister chairman i thank you for the
that occurred in the state bill the two insurance companies or massachusetts woke up to this corey you say that the trial or abused its discretion you've got to get the all you've got to get those facts right and you know there's some other things in here that i can tell th this is nationwide they operate in this agreement covers over thirty eight states the map alone dictate that it is close to seventy five million dollars or
gratian this case deals with the interpretation and application of the telephone consumer protection act and we're here today asking that the court that this clear reverse the trial course entry of summary judgment between christie and b to b there was no such limitation that we don't know well we do know that you say bring him or her person right right she said that she contracted with christie told christie what she was doing christie told her to send six thousand faxes and start from point a to move west without limitation right  that no one knows where they came from some limits on somebody but some amount in the real world to do business and he goes outside the scope of the story and the people he's dealing with have no reason to doubt that he's actually representing me that's and they had a chance to cross examine i couldn't raise any doubts in her mind what they were told to do was somehow violating of their contractual obligations when they're just doing what the contracts
all thank you from you everything will be mommy had something to see i'm even more alone than you are what i needed someone to work well i need responsibility you know what i mean  will go through regardless of any obstruction it is my wish that we finance this deal one hundred percent molly how you can say that i have confidence in the project and in return for your things progressing well for not everything friday you can leave the windows open and i am glad to hear that nothing but well what would you want me to do
brief we are going to accept the question of the motion that response to the material that was objected to so i think if i decide to stand where we are then you absolutely these are examples you don't have to do these either just as you don't have to provide access to say here is this phrase i will give you some examples of the way of what would satisfy this element of the claim and the examples given claim dependency issues where there was a mistake and we depend solely was written in such a way that the financial services companies were also required to be internet access providers dependent on a claim ninety five the company offering financial services to customers provides access to the internet for customers however added to the specification discloses internet access providers telephone companies and cable television companies as examples of companies providing customers with access to the internet in other words your spec doesn't say that these financial services companies can provide access to the internet and so this dependency is wrong and i'm going to interpret it as such now this is this court previously it in the way his case for example which we cite as it has a lot of evidence of this is obviously contemporaneous of what the examiner actually relied on the rules scheme of a sale of patents to show that there could be any disclaimer in the particular patent issue because if you look at the way the terms were used across the family it was we should interpret this much space to be the fleet the same as saying communications communications are very common example might be boosting the website doesn't have to be necessary to that work and claim one might be broader you're discussing the specification could you talk about i know the district court didn't focus on the prosecution history but could you talk particularly about the question of the prosecution history what the district court did here thank you very much mr
me these thing know nothing much and if your hands been acting up lately to me any rumors of all the activity of cause not what you're trying to do is get sylvia and not ruin us but the something going on and i can't put my finger on it say that's funny i never did anything like that before you suppose it could be the drum they've got me there and they could be but it's not for any o b o reasons and i'll guarantee you that come on sylvia before ramsey make you think that there which is out there on a hill of the house and bring me one of the little pigs that yes rome is rules so be careful and don't forget graham that i know everything you've been doing i know all about is dealing with building it because you wouldn't want her the police to find out about that which you know and i don't understand how you found out about it either but when i find out who to make are so scared to leave this out in the never come back and when she's gone i can assume my rightful place again and if the police find out about it what then they won't stand for that sort of thing you know that outtake yeah that you do your part of keep the if you love me why do you have i don't know maybe a good p this is where isabel told me she'd meet you are even though we did have different mother he never forgave me for staying here he hated me please isabel and this is sad but all this is you know but how can i help these you on let me it can all be settled in a friend of them but isabel i don't know i have no claim on oh yes you have a claim on him as long as he loved you and as long as you stay he will continue to love you well what can i do i haven't given him any encouragement you can go back to new york where to lead downloading the love you love him that much i love him so much that it hurts i don't have them ever since i was a little girl but he would never look at me while you are around now you come back and spawn all my plans i was
electrolux holdings against the united states two ninety three you had capital gains it could be offset the entire amount so at that point you would not have any five here only related back to ninety four on you know there are no if you don't have that statue imitation from ninety five would still be the same ninety six ninety seven ninety eight is the accounting calculation of the end now that and the taken against any capital gains in the nine hundred ninety five year then that amount the exact amount is in the tribute a bill in part at least to the carry back if the overpayment means the concept of the fact that they had an overpayment year so why why would the amount of over payment made ninety five than be attributable to the carry back to region not just the capital  entire area there's a lot of logic to your position the question i have the wrestle with whether the stack you unlike most of the internal revenue code tended to incorporate that
sole reason that the opponents essentially came up with a new theory of unconscionable of the for the st time during their initial appeal that's the challenge they mount today on remand the district court was given the opportunity to address caution in rego that a large company with many many employees slash independent contractors can safely include a mandatory arbitration provision a mandatory payment of that contract term there is nothing yet to be complained of the party has been relieved of that which he or she thought was an unconscionable terms but i'm worried about all the people who don't have to wherewithal to challenge and think they are bound even though it's been deemed unconscious little by the negro courts by it well your honor as i suppose that they could they could to seek to chat bring the same challenge in the arbitration proceeding itself and  back ok as we all know that often occurs that the example that your honor has provided a fee shifting provision it is not uncommon at all that a party in arbitration will challenge  objects to what he or she believes is an unfair imposition those potential fees would still have the opportunity for that to be resolved in arbitration as it should be ok thank you possibility that a party might seek to enforce a provision bar in pursuit of certain federal sketched reclined situation that the ribbon court distinguished from the one before it which is identical to our circumstances it makes also the possibility of continued consideration of the terms and ultimately a decision to sever it if there's a conclusion that it's unconscionable in either event in this case the decision of the district court should be affirmed because while i strenuously would argue that the the issue was mooted and there is no need to address the unconscio challenge if you were to address it the preacher imitation should be made that it is not an unconscionable term and even were it an unconscionable term the decision should be made to sever it i'll speak  by saying that there are rare and exceptional circumstances where party is relieved of the obligation to sit to show procedural unconscious villainy we don't think that there is such rare and exceptional circumstances here but even if we look at the
procedural history here when you're born and moved for the voluntary dismissal you will pose with a number of arguments and one of them and i think it was basically just two pages and agree was a reference to your claims for relief under section two eighty five and the need for discovery and briefing on that issue and i didn't see in the record below anything other that than after the briefing on the voluntary dismissal motion there was the opinion of the court which is the basis for this appeal so you never really had the briefing on th issue and you were able to show or the court found below that actually they didn't review the file they just filed suit would you contend that you were title to attorney sees them ok let's say that we re mandated and the discovery shows that they did review the file before they filed suit and you pointed to a number of red flags that you think where enough to require further investigation do you need that act trying to develop those red flags more or more red flags or define more or do we have the record that we need right now to make a decision as to whether the failure to further investigate based on the red flags would support in a war distinction to then it had to be supposedly i guess overnight they don't say this is the declaration overnight it to seattle so we're up to what we know i just love this quote they put their video on august go off what time did they have to do it in the investigation for they bought this discover there are two issues raised by all who on his appeal and on both of those we have a fundamental difference of opinion about the standard of review is this core the first issue concerns which is god in this case so you're saying that rule eleven in that context gives you the ability to rely on a presumption when you buy and  levon for importing legal analysis into the exceptional case area i mean i have to say when you ask actually for attorney's fees in response to the appeal because of your claim that there reference to ruhleben was inappropriate because nowhere in the just seems like quite a stretch for you to suggest that they can't even by analogy talk about ruhleben cases that would amount to something that is so frivolous in this context that you want to get attorney's fees if i may or i have no problem with them your title and re the validity of your title to take discovery in this area that they took that discovery later in the discovery period as opposed to first saying the discovery period doesn't say that additional curative condition of granting additional discovery as as a condition of this missile that wasn't requested below it wasn't in their opening brief and suggested it's too late to submit that for the first time in your file we also know  investigation that there was no reasonable effort by the here but based on the other facts before the court they found that there was no exceptional case and there would be no reason to gather anything more i thank you you now