under the consumer fraud the court awarded judgment and ultimately an attorney fees of about thirty two thousand the judgment that was rendered for the repayment of the travel money plaintiffs in not following through on those things i would like to up or that question here i will but justice but yes i was characterized as disingenuous by the trial court there's testimony suggest that the amount of fees and the rest of the factors and we both agree on the factors for reasonable we just suggest that the court abused its discretion in  fifty nine and it was dropped to thirty two fails the other point that the defendant make is that the corner just went against the corporations when the travel plans were made was organized in nineteen ninety nine dissolve on february the a two thousand and eight the and then  new corporation in nevada which took over in march two thousand and nine the complaint was filed in this case the initial complaint and i fell for thirtieth two thousand and eight simply put the corporation kept the action against your individually when we suggest space and corporate law he is insulated from judgment and therefore it should be against the corporation as to attorney liable if it's a corporation isn't accurate that you have two of those possible factors that would apply in this case one being where the purchaser is merely a continuation of the seller and the illinois supreme court has held that without the ability to recover attorneys fees even in cases where the attorney's fees far outweigh far exceeds the amount of judgment that's the protections of the act would be  illusory and in fact that's why the act provides for such fees because a lot of times in these consumer private matters the amount of judgment or potential judgment is relatively low but it's where attorneys fees are going to exceed that it court has agreed that to hold otherwise what in fact discouraged injured parties and would be counterproductive to the very purpose of the had already paid and had been credited not because the defendant did anything but because fees are credited there count ed so what we were really protecting was about eleven thousand six hundred dollars not just the five thousand nine hundred  removal there were a couple of issues that were raised in the defendant's brief that he did not address here and i was actually clear whether or not he took issue with the contract interpretation itself or the cite mediation or arbitration thereby they waived that in our claim is that even though the contract doesn't specifically mention attorneys fees at the trial at the trial court or if it proceeds along that communication between the attorney the client it's going to discourage consumers in this case from seeking those fees if they know that it's there's the potential that they could be forced to have disclose confidential communication and that should be the choice that a that a party has to make either they see fees and disclose or they can you know waive their right c p s and not have to disclose its agreements and so we would argue that  prevented us from having to disclose certain agreements with our client was proper in this case with regard to the defendant's argument that mr  be should somehow not be held personally liable the the facts are a little bit different than than they were stated planet travel group why report rated nine hundred ninety nine and it continued to operate until it was involuntarily dissolved in february of two thousand and eight that prior to that in december of two thousand and seven i just as mr fear became aware of making them subject to liability to the plate for these amount those are two exceptions where individual liability will be assessed and in this case we believe certainly should be assessed and i certainly don't feel the defendants have shocked and facts which would show that the trial court in any way actually of was the five thousand nine hundred ninety four dollars and thirty two cents cites the defendant wanted to make sure that any check that they got to us was for the five thousand six hundred nineteen dollars of faith use that to try and reverse the visa credit so that if that was the only reason why at that point they refused to have to settle we were forced to proceed with the litigation and again even when we finally did get to trial i have which was about three years and to reconsider and in that in those motions included the amount that they admitted to only at trial so again just continuing still in this matter and the hearing of fees that was eventually had was had for another year after