what are you saying that she's entitled to and what is he saying she's he says she's nice she's saying she's entitled to four fifty dollars per month he's saying she's a little eighty nine dollars her and what is that's what but that's what you're saying that's in your soul but let me ask you is that what you're saying that's what you're saying that you're entitled yes your client he title to the one half of the entire pension that he is receiving now pro rated she would get one him or we would we would begin with one half of that figure would be five hundred and then she would be entitled to half of that because it she's entitled to fifty percent of what he would for those fifteen years it's fifty percent of the formula that you use to determine the marital ratio right that's exactly what we're that's what that's what i said i want i want real figures  he do the math with what figures that issues well there was no credit report and there was a bystander's report there and that's why the case has to be with you have to understand the procedural history is very specified when it would be paid hourly it would be paid it seems that everything is there and it was rejected by if you take a look at the seventy page petition filed by my client that was entered pursuant to the judgment of dissolution you'll have the calculation as to what the pension amount she is entitled to under that original or it's ok and then the question follows that is what's the formula or what's the calculation that you follow to decide what that pension amount is it's in the quilt fro the next where the disputed but i did ask your earlier is there either a place that binds the pension fund to pay to your client a certain portion of the pension amount that you that the ex husband gets every month no right and so aren't you  why what's plan you know that's not what you're looking for so you don't care whether there's a quadro or not you're just looking for more money isn't that all case well because we're entitled to know pension fund to divide the pension pursuant to the child smith there's no dispute that the judgments as when it's as and it should be divided in a certain way but we need we need in order directing the pension fund to ensure that to divide the pension you never asked us for any quadro or anything like that thank you very much  fundamental question first comes to should there be an order from the court to the pension fund directing it without without getting into this you know the amount should there be an order directed to the pension fund  inappropriate way to resolve this case but what i am saying is that it is clear i mean i have i don't think i need to go through but i have sections up to the provisions of the judgement for this marriage of marital settlement agreement and the choir which i m hearing you know that we'd like you to focus on is the you really need a qualified domestic relations are here or you just need an order of course as to what your clients are think answer to your question writers you need what you need with a pension or bears i think that there's a quilt rubbish that my understanding of the record so otherwise and i think wrong or submit it is my point even though it's right for it but otherwise it would be up to the husband to give her whatever schirra she would i don't think i don't think that's a problem with what i agree it's not appropriate but the pension fund is under no obligation until it receives a proper order from the courts directing it took a certain amount and that what it was never entered and i  right she wasn't entitled to a change in the amount but that you are agreeing that there is the right for order to the court to direct the pension fine to give her