MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
have played high school college and pro football helping my team win the two thousand and six championship it was an amazing day but it can't compare to the joy i feel every day with my loving wife and three beautiful daughters my football career ended after i suffered my fifty caution did you know that over a million athletes suffered concussions each year that includes poison girls every age every type and level sport it isn't always clear that a player has had a concussion so parents athletes and coaches need to learn about concussion signs and symptoms the american academy of neurology recommends athletes to have a concussion be immediately removed from play and not return until assessed by a health care professional trained  just because kids play sports doesn't mean they need sports drinks sports drinks are loaded with sugar that kids don't need when they get out and play water in a healthy snack is all it takes to bounce back water has no added sugar added colors twenty two communities that appear on your screen now you likely belong to the mystic river watershed this vital resource is a natural living system that we all share since one thousand nine hundred seventy two the mystic river watersh association has successfully fought to protect and restore this treasure now i'm asking you to join that effort please go to mystic river dot org to become a member and to find out how you can help have you or a loved one had a head injury head injuries and concussions often cause vision disorders which can interfere with your recovery do you have double vision words seem to move on the page or do you struggle with motion sickness these are all signs that you may have a correctable vision problem you need to see an optometrist who provides an in office program of vision therapy for more information or to find a doctor near you visit c o v dot org
a reasonable and light of the evidence well it is but for by the nurses is such that they were selling paid end users most of them agricultural users ninety percent but other people to buy there are too many if you ones that they have the questions back on are the interpretation of the evidence obviously we do agree that's going to manifest weight and knowledge that par is a high standard but as to whether or not the current use falls within that they are selling one come up which they are bringing in on trucks loading and storing they taking it back out this is not all  and i say it's a commercial parking facility and i start story well that's what he did and that's the city there obviously said we didn't have it no no you were supposed to be doing a commercial parking facilities years you're craft before you build a big metal structure at a substantial cost for the purpose of this ng this commercial parking i might want to see what the market is for they have it in advance as
disclose that she was going to gain financially from the sales and she had a personal interest as much as an agent for the insurance carriers was just one example of breach if you look at once again  i'll be very honest with you but when they come to ask you about something different how is the sale of insurance related to legal services they wouldn't have come back number one  giving legal advice over twenty years i have an obligation to disclose to you every potential conflict and potential violation of the fiduciary duty even when i think i'm not really rendering legal services you came to me and closing that she didn't speak to purchase and insurance product they don't take the next step and say you know my purchasing insurance product and we have an attorney client relationship because she was advised me that i needed to do my wills that i needed are why can't we get to discovery fear so the actual issues can be identified because the compliance deficient on its face and if we would look past the attorney client relationship i'm happy to do that because directed him to so i think the you know the biggest problem this complaint have the first time the second time the third time we've read it and then again i was preparing for this appeal is that they are absolutely no also in addition there among the seven breaches i listed all right not just one but among the seven is by not telling him there are other process there you can choose from in that vein but you may or may not lose
so you want us to write that when you say allow plaintiff to proceed with alleged claim that that is in effect the same thing as a motion to reconsider that's what you want to store it if it say anywhere in your motion that the court made an error when it dismissed your case under two six one act and you have to dismiss simply complaint was that dismissed  don't the cases say that when the court dismisses a complaint the six point five it's the plaintiff's burden to persuade the trial judge to specify that dismissal stop without prejudice or that the plaintiff will be permitted to  whether that particular complaint in front of it was murder they have because i think the holding is still and it's still clear in geisler that if it's just a motion to a band you cannot equate it with an detainer act they specifically requested possession and of judgment that included our assessment something throughout or it said what it may have a further ground regarding i think the place to be dismissed because what he was asking to happen in the plate was basically
hearing there isn't a turning to represent a team isn't it incumbent upon the attorney to make some request there petition the court for time to answer these are these using the courts to spontaneous supposed period of time but at some point he's before the court himself and doesn't he have represent as an attorney representing himself he has notice of these and they are and we could also make a bunch of money there at the essence of the complaint which is illegal activity in the first place he's saying the flaw of the poor committed was the fact that he wasn't able to follow his creditors because he was problem doesn't make much sense complaint you have to assume that betty warner was a part of the conspiracy which he cannot make because obviously he would not have come in and show that for four years
citizens in the absence of a viable class quite eerie but actual injury as a requirement supreme court's decision in a reversed the state bar and second the circuit boards error in finding that common issues predominate o now on your from your hose outlets on your new homes you have to manage site right so the only way i think you can get your neighborhood is if you didn't have any side on your on you're ice maker so then you have to poison ice
law that we have received over these past two months is a testament to the quality of her life and her relationships as to the ways in which all of our lives were impacted by one of the great gifts that i received while i was able to watch harold and russ interact with all of your grandchildren i don't know about you but i find it to be of disappointments or prostration it completely loss over the other happened was for me thing marilyn interact with her grandchildren gave me time virally merrill's parenting was firmly rooted in the wisdom of dr spock the pediatrician not little things that i will have here to share with her the future i've been amazed to discover that i have also experienced an equal measure of thing for us for all of the last incident b s that she's given to me my well and hum yeah how
wouldn't i would say to korea that it would be i would have a tough time defending her fire with the motion to dismiss for the state of michigan because chrysler chander that does come over to michigan a would be harder for me to make that same argument with respect to the state of michigan none of those factors apply to the state of illinois on with respect to when the lower court did it really awareness that you're proud of mate who will end in the state of illinois that would only qualify opinion for jurisdiction if the court went with the more i interpretation of stream of commerce which thing they make decisions here so often the decision is this five or ten thousand times each or they know that at the end of their assuming there is a vehicle which has a sticker that th first off the plane and as a resident of the state of wisconsin on earlier i brought to the court product attention to illinois is not enough for illinois to exercise personal jurisdiction over them without an addition showing that defendants have purposely avail themselves of ill stream of commerce into an air purposely direction toward the form stage here no first purposeful contact between illinois and benjamin
is a trial that lasted three hours defense from the very beginning and the victim the alleged victim was given a rape kit and the state  and the defense attorney rightly asked questions about th fact and his objection was based on her giving medical opinion testimony and that objection was a state and what question that that common be disregarded and that the jury disregarded the last thing that this jury heard from the only medical person in the case was this bringing in the can say this it was rephrased and or it was rephrase it in your experience but yet it was still the same it was still her getting a medical career on the i guess repeated basis that's correct here is she stated this based on her really that's correct and so if she was she when she was testifying about her experience rather than just her separate files you'd normally just have one file and count one count true but with two separate files within that require a motion by the people arm bar by the defense to join together otherwise you'd have to and this witness has a right only that the alleged victim i did not tell her that she was hearsay testimony was allowed to be just the civically said that in order to make a ruling on whether or not this hearsay testimony as to what ch
notwithstanding any other provision of law if there's an automobile accident at a hospital is required to disclose those types of reports upon request by state police or local police so  that there's a lot of discussion in your brief about how this is really a police investigation and by statute the police officer is authorized to just go the hospital and say give me the report so how is your client prejudiced process but i believe this is a quote from the case said that the court said that if proper procedures had been followed however the state's attorney could still receive the documents from the grand jury thus defend it was not prejudiced by the process used to obtain his mental health records so there they said you know ok station misused the process but if they had come back to the grand jury he still got to see them so there's no prejudice so kind of the same thing here isn't it  they said that this is a strong misused grand jury process yet they said even if you use proper procedures and the documents would come back to the grand jury the state's attorney still would have gotten to see him so therefore no prejudice  this was really grand jury investigation it was really happening is the ranger who was directing these activities and investigating whether f drivers will be tested for blood alcohol problems because of the nature of treatment in the emergency room and that they're probably they just really being that salinger is the state's attorney did nothing with this this material that he was he didn't use it to for they're going to find a private investigation he didn't use it to get a search he didn't get it to do to get anything else he didn't use it further he did nothing with it but examined it and then presented to the grand jury so you know even under wilson you know and in the grand jury is going to release this in the court it's going to order it released to the states training on october fifteenth so you know in wilson as you pointed out the prosecutor may screen the material prior to its presentation to the jurors but he did can use this subpoena as a ruse to gain information and that's and that's exactly what  itself and some of the stuff was pretty inscrutable i mean their medical records and lab but but the the the salient point is outside of the viewing the material in in january fifteenth two thousand and eight issued indictment based on that and further testimony that flushed out how many drinks the defendant had in the twelve hours since he started drinking and nightmare here issue and let me ask a question about that because i haven't seen the record yet but in the initial proceeding wasn't the state trooper put on the stand in front of the grand jury yes even the very first time so i mean wasn't didn't
price which was what the company was purchased in two thousand and three he did he said trapped in a building that was sold he then subtracted the outstanding debt with the person basically testified with regard to the declining industry laying off twenty five percent of the workforce the decline in sales approximate forty percent in used those numbers the the issue has two other shareholders that hear the merger really interest and they want to make sure they give their distributions they could care less whether that mr white situation they want to make sure that they did in this unusual she would get paid if she commonsense could realize why this town i'm on the case law has fairly consistently indicated that that is not a good idea terms of former spouses remaining as coal business owners the policy of the quickly able to understand the concept of the core through our we're not looking to profit beyond what your group had a word here there may be a final solution i think the reason getting is it is a piece of paper which is a this in order to or that says he has to pay it but now to a particular schedule or elsewhere sick or to take a look at the record in terms of the past two years of income mr coffee disputed that there was a impropriety that there was no flaw for he basically the difference between the two calculation to assess the way that mr mcneil undertook this task was he determined with the historical  the future capital expenditure should be because it includes to appreciation on assets the company no longer homes which was primarily the building so that's askew figure what we're really looking to do here is to determine where the future capital expenditure sense in the real world and he and he was abusing to himself in just a situation where he said well they bought this business for fifteen million two hundred thousand dollars two thousand and three is more whether the the actual era for a trial judge not to consider a similar transaction with regard to the business center safety issue which was a few years earlier and there's nothing improper under evaluation law for a trial  fifteen point two million dollar value for he applied reduce the debt and applied his discounts similar to what mr coffey did at the pit kind of shows that the judge might not have stood mr mcmahon is testimony when in million dollars what i meant is that the western cases sure of the court can come up with events in the range of what the experts but they said that within the manifests manifest weight of the evidence
or treat the defendant and number or the only purpose of the search of the defendant's birth was to complete a routine police report at page twenty that a routine police report could be done officer fears most is already important in this case the state crime limits a number of reasons why the search should be justified one prong of their doctrine after doing the emergency systems that police officers often provide for example in the case of an accident where the police officer was motivated to find information in a driver's license such as whether the person was diabetic or having medical condition there is a recognized exception for man for us but if the police officer can't leave this under all that's not my purpose now there is a provision of the water having to do with the administrative duties of the police officers and carrying out a service to obtain a driver's license and in this particular case there was screened and it's a small rural community in southeastern illinois but it easily located her and her mother knew this police officer from contacts with them at the bank so these are not strangers he unilaterally to wait until she left the scene and then they serve her and starts looking through it and it is not for her benefit but for this to complete a police report and i would suggest to side pocket or something it was within the hour within the purse he was looking for the wallet to gain access to the wires and which he would be there but he didn't get the life that without necessarily got a big out of my commanding officer for making the first hour the area where it was subject to the elements but when he took the next step and went into to an area that has a higher expectation of privacy and it's not for the not right when he did go to the hospital she was on the lower hospital she was only in the low hospital a very short period of time which was transferred to  when you looked in the car or were you in flight then five or when you were able to identify who was in the car and sir i recognized her when i was talking to he left no doubt this was not a following and hanson it it's not inappropriate to do that as the general proposition but i'm going to raise the more specific issue for this war and that is to say let us look at the purpose of the officer as other boards another
that that seems to be directly to the point is that this is the defendant's best and he states in reference to the question of additional salaries he says not that i can recall except with the priest i went over there one night taken some merchandise and kind  was obviously you don't write something go for twenty five years or twenty years or whatever or you guys only work in seven days unless that was what you thought you were entering into he couldn't vote for a sale that didn't but you can't just or could not assume that since the information of his salary increase was contained in the partnership tax returns and the financial statements  work that's what that's what the agreement states is gone he's going to do all the database for someone to just my fire there was nothing my client did not do on the contract and there's nothing in the read where mr gross error asked my client to make some major decision in a partnership it just didn't happen and there's nothing in rather that sole if you know if we just follow the contract itself he should've exercised those provisions that he had an
anyway it doesn't matter what our policy is if we have all we're protected even if that also is a result of an abuse of our discretion the legislature wanted this to never happen so it must be because we felt horrible about what
and the physician the defendant physician said i disagree with both so so so he was testifying for himself but as an expert yes but i'm standing for th most i don't know how to raise that with any other really instructions give the jury written instructions during the instructions conference about to the effect of the wealth of either party has nothing to do with this case or anything like that plane actually did buy a three hundred thousand dollar boat in other words the question is was a really good faith basis for whether or not the facts work when the question was asked wall is the record reflect either way all of this is s on well if you don't go on then say if you have all these injuries how do you get in the mode how to get it out in the water and so forth and so on but i mean the way the question the series of questions leading up to that the through the money part
as associates look into a different one fifty had to discussions i believe oral discussions in your area and at the end of the second discussion the basic format of their arrangement had been agreed to the entire litigation parties at section seventeen which is labeled early termination and i point that out to you because the trial court fixated on the label of section seventeen and making is ruling on asked look to whether any cause of action could be stated so if i improperly or did not allege additional aspects in the complaint you may be right i don't think that limits this court at this point in time and whether the liquidated damages are should difficult answer to your honor because my client filed a verified complaint amended complaint and that it we did come up between us and she does not remember the specific language to dr levy that would have used in and she knew what you saw i'm not suggesting otherwise she has a ph d she knew what she saw and she talks to her husband and frankly they both decided we don't have any choice we are here you're working he's working by the way also  district one fifty's attorneys that my client has never seen until after she begins work and it's an unequal bargaining position at the liquidated damages to begin with which is itself illegal just one glad you brought that up consideration is that she now has to work under a liquidated damage clause which allows for to be terminated with a thirty day notice provision so she can be terminated after one month of employment that is a difference performance factor and what she understood why she would be your area in july of two thousand and ten ah as i understand it there are only two elements we must now show the court promise new due consideration here all happened at the same time with respect to of course there were there can't be there can't be an oral contract or our contract with the me indicates that i'm frame itself makes any difference so the fact that one of the occurrences in this case happened in july and one of the occurrences happened september is certainly going to be sufficient to create the same legal theory that is the happening at list at this point with my i am no longer lives here and it's been very difficult for her to undertake the associate superintendent position again although she will have that choice reasonable fee channel back technically would was appealed
i want to take care of a guy just a little too smart take off the  so i'm still listening just because i got to jam over a gambling debt doesn't make me a bank robber i watch a lot about the truck if i knew the answer to that i wouldn't be here now for an answer or one of the other truck vendors here or the insurance company is willing to give you a break in those we are same questions same answers you can save your breath it's my job joe after all we've got to make good the  back go along with him some questions i want to as we didn't have nothing against you we didn't even know you just feel that way lucky me who else was in on it i don't know that either but we all form a format about their only pray three in the  years one month and a day since i got my walking papers how would i like to find oil in my backyard i don't know but i might be able to deliver it going to you wouldn't fool enough friend might be anything and again it could be just what you're looking for i've been watching a couple of strange characters tripped in here one of the reward this will bring him down which should be pretty twenty five percent of what the insurance companies stand to lose and that's over a quarter of a million actual run of money and you're the cuff agent was played company my pleasure not bad at all  i get the commissioner to reopen your case by skins just bring in the suck save up to play cards time giving me some good advice thanks or and nice girl but in case you're thinking of mothering me forget it i'm no straight talk you can take up an i like my neck without a collar  mind your own business miss don't worry i won't  out of bounds he said that before why isn't that enough and i tell you not this time all right he's an ex con i want to hit you over the head with what else to know about him isn't side if i'm wrong i'll apologize trick didn't come off the way we plan my company will underwrite him any time
um you know