this is a social security disability case in which the ok we're just ability benefits is now seven years old i would like to suggest that the court should consider the potential here to improve the performance of district courts by your action here both parties argue that the just the courts remain and in this case was improperly reached the parties are you know on different grounds of course but i would suggest that if the district court would have addressed issues in a clear and incisive rulings on all the issues that were raised in court and including the remedy that this case might not be here at all taking up your time the reason i suggested is because two of the essential cases in there in the history of considering whether to remain and or to find a person disabled talk about the possibility of improving the performance of administrative law judges by not me manning and awarding disability inclusion in those cases they both quoted or talked about this situation where an administrative law just reaches the conclusion first then justifies by making findings that justify the conclusion that's already been reached here to get to the district court did the same thing reach the conclusion that they wanted to re and then found that conclusion justified by insisting that resolution of almost all the issues depended on more information necessary in regards to a doctor i think that the court should unburden itself of these types of appeals in such matters way tending to improve the performance of the oldies and district courts by insisting that the issues be addressed and not referred to what i think is a kind of nonexistent social security disability case decided by this court and all three of them impact quite directly on this case so i would just like to mention each one of those three of those were cited in additional stations to the court although it's certainly possible although i don't think that the net circuit has ever ordered a finding of disability where the district court and i don't think that's happened yet i think the trend is in the opposite direction by the way and maybe there's an opportunity to look at that here if the court did apply the rule invent and say that a doctor or was a treat or treating physician even though he was a team leader and as a psychiatrist and his opinion should be you provide this chemo brother health care worker that told a patient many more times and i thought a little i think you know an unusual situation i can't remember what was unusual but that the court did know that the treating physician in that case maybe should be given even more weight than usual because he he didn't even see a clean it regularly or often or very much at all he supervised all the information about that patient was there for much greater familiarity and know l case that was also recently decided here this this case is very close to the situation this is the most recent consideration of whether a district court we men should be looked at and they decided that of discretion is the proper standard for review of the remedy issue and made a list of various issues that were to be decided in that case including if the person is disabled the timing and duration the disability so i think under that case very few cases if any ever would be changed to disability because the district court used its discretion and i think recently first asked whether the administrative law judge improperly rejected evidence second whether there are no outstanding issues remaining and third whether it's clear that the administration would be required to find the claimant the steeple if the rejected evidence for credit so in this case the district court tone under the first step that he'll she may have improperly rejected this court awarding benefits for reasons he expressed but short of that are there any other issues from his brief that could be inappropriate under that standard disposition here that involves looking at the issues because you're just positioned the abuse of discretion looking at the remedy involves looking first at the issues that would cause that remedy so i not even i am asking