has become in this case is where the petitioner sets a hearing and i will suggest roll the short notice hearing them to put the pressure on to respond g the judge tim p olson and biased that there may be a question of representation because it was a post appeal and that i may in fact not be representing i think it's the first time where any time there's a financial issue such as attorney fees that it should be filed with the petition itself if you're going to ask her to turn the speech down i think you should take the time to investigate it maybe trying  that basically provides for a trial thirty seven i think thirty eight day i think is that it's a mistake and what did he do i'm sorry what did your client do once you stop paying me in that condition for that terminates you was he lost one of his retirement fund payments and it became exhausted and as he testified in court the early retirement don was going to be exhausted by his calculations and i think it was like five months now actually i think the last six months but davit when it comes back household goods unknown i argued in the original page tried to do it here this lady has hundreds of christmas because of the way the whole thing unfolded i have felt that i was never on even ground as far as preparation going into it here this was push appleby understood certainly by september what was that issue and how it was going to be addressed  just that when you send a pleading after the thirty day period to mr appleby he just won't show up and you didn't and he didn't have to any other attorney that i  are blue if any importance in cases instead of taking care of what was most important and that is the the issue at hand in this case they had a very limited the discovery responses the day of the hearing i'm not sure he was even filed to them then i gave them to him and he had a right to engage in other discovery process use if you have a question about my client's thinking the fact that mr so was no longer required pay me in addition her financial circumstances were such that she had four hundred dollars in the bank and eight thousand dollars with a credit card debt yes she had purchased over the two years since the divorce a new home but she went from a fifty thousand some dollars home to a sixty five thousand dollars home we want to remember that mr soul is living in a hundred sixty income over living expenses of three hundred fifty dollars i also pointed out he spending two hundred fifty dollars a month for churches and charities not that that's an issue on the one hand  eleven thousand dollars because of a two thousand dollars turn in revenue service  the judge and unfortunately by the time we are trial the attorney fees had risen to just over seven thousand  income is more than twice my client's her income has not been changed yes or billion changes and so basically we're looking at a situation where thought you know you do a motion practice but then i went through a period of time no let's get to the to the matter i'm not a big litigator i don't do a lot of lifting but i do think that the basic statutory  why we have rules fellow originally david was the same in the original trial a year after the first that it was filed and in this case there were comments about well well we made mistakes here we made mistakes there again it comes back i