have no or very limited access to arts sciences foreign languages or sport it is even less rigorous curriculum and most critically given no ability to interact during the school day but non disabled split in a segregated facility rather than being mainstreamed as is one of the priority mandates sophie so i would think if the complaint is that a child should be put in the regular classroom o overlap here and it would be a child by trial proceeding in which someone would be required to determine whether that child could make meaningful educational and non critical or gains in require exhaustion it simply means the hearing officer misapplied the idea in under the idea you might have grounds to set that aside because if one of the students goes can't they ask for a plan that puts them into one of the regular schools the springfield schools do have a number of students who are perhaps very similar under not everybody gets into the public schools as that group of students roughly two hundred my memory is there is three hundred and fifty and the public schools in a more integrated session but it's not because springfield has made no effort to comply with the very least restrictive environment requirements and it seems to had been determined on a case by forward with his idea appeal he may well have won and have been named stream but what does that tell us then about the next student who hasn't even exhausted much less the school guth tries to some and probably should have mainstream some of them it wouldn't be surprising if either is they'd perhaps had a strong argument for the difficulties of mainstreaming we don't know because you've presented put the way people systemic come on your complaint but in the end the amounts to the results of the compliance  id requirements for a determination has been made that they can go into the regular public schools with support service recess for some children with special support your claim is there's a group who should try to one hundred children who should be in that category and you claim you can proceed and  case and the student lost because they were finding that that student's disabilities were so intractable mainstreaming was not possible would that mean there were one hundred and ninety nine dollars students automatically lost we would have to look at the next student in the next student might have voted different complex behavioral issues that could be dealt with with certain services and that student would then win but reasonable accommodation but the on an individual to go back to trudge chaotic is a question to you certainly but i want you to come up with a case where e you saying deal seen my well have standing apart from the special needs context except they exist right because it's the disability law center so their purpose and insisting has to do essentially an argument that in an educational context there is a unstated exception or not intended by congress because the congressional history says that they don't intend for every kid to have to emotional disorders serious enough to require some type of ip approach you know those two hundred and up and special day schools but the there are five hundred and we are in non segregated how that sounds like that paints a picture of a spectrum not a binary cut off you know it's there some degree of behavioral problems they're able to accommodate in the school and then they get to a point and they go get it seems that pushes back against the notion that we would deal with the two hundred dollars as a single entity rather than each