which in part reversed the decision of the illinois workers compensation commission the commission had decided that mr long your field proved that he was permanently totally disabled that he had failed to prove they was entitled to before the commission on february thirteenth one thousand nine hundred five ted for the context as to why we were here for the first time before you nineteen years later we've had at least three arbitrators for in the case it's been argued that the commission level at least three times been to the circuit court at least two times and frankly my client's on its fourth name since this case  dealing with a right right but case with chronic pain and depression and it's decision of december twenty second two thousand and eight the commission ordered us to provide vocational rehabilitation mr lunger the initial assessment was done in period two thousand and nine and the vote has thing was done in march march twentieth two thousand and nine and they invoke specialist concluded that mr he was scheduled on numerous occasions for meetings which he didn't keep he told the vocational experts that he can't work because his doctor says he can't work and then they demanded here to restrictions by other doctors and he said the purpose perform these positions and he's expected to get paid twelve hours from now no worse your evidence to be going to get paid more other than his testimony about this good government job that he could get if t wage what i stipulated to at the start of the trial was that if he was currently employed in the same capacity as a set of person might it be earning one thousand dollars and twenty cents per white desk a stipulation i made it so if you take  considered speculation and my line of questioning was rejected by the arbitrator so the speculation will always be speculation here but you know even going beyond then looking at his claim for permanent the total to this ability he's failed to prove that there was never calamitous of a permanent and total disability there's a difference of opinion among the doctors as to whether he's capable of working including some of his treating doctors you can't say he made a diligent non successful job search he may know which camp to do a job search didn't even apply for a single job the commission's decision commission it improperly considered the galleon many cases only applied one part of it then he said well if that's not the proper standard then i'd say it is the decision against the manifest weight of the evidence he found that it was against manifest the doesn't participate and i don't think he should be rewarded for his conduct we would respectfully suggest that the decision of the circuit court of birth and the decision of the commission represents the position that we have in this case that we have right on a wage differential and unless there's other questions i can move on to  and he was also diagnosed by to respond in its own medical expert with a underlying psychiatric disorder which i think played an important role in this particular case  but in looking at the evidence it's my focus is primarily on a statement that mr bowser the vocational rehabilitation counsellor made in this case when she initially sat down with the petitioner to evaluate him for purposes of determining whether or not he was a eligible candidate for vocational rehabilitation and she mentioned dead in looking at his work experience that there were no transferable skills that could be drawn from his work for the respond into him prior to that would carry over into a study in terry type work category which was the physical limitation that had been placed upon him by support the decision and particle i think when you look at the evidence that did support the decision and this is it my focus is very specific and something that ms bose did has concluded in this case he said to terry job and she she identifies what those jobs are based upon his skill set now that's where that this is the focus of my argument is her understanding of his skill set it's payable are accounts receivable or payroll or were all jobs that seem to be suited to his experience because he held a position as a treasurer for the cane county democratic party back in the mid ninety's and when i asked her specifically well what were the skills that he developed in that position because i understood him mr longer testified regarding what his response bill before in that balanced a checkbook he'd never balanced a checkbook in his own mind he had no no skills in that regard what you have she said he was suitable to do pay payroll clerk accounts receivable received she indicated that it would be bookkeeping and in fact when i asked her about the skills that she thought that he possessed from the treasury position she indicated bookkeeping skills like bookkeeping  just do nothing rich or make brokers do anything but write checks they don't do bookkeeping i don't know the answer to that question it was not something that was it was mentioned by julie bose what she indicated is that back particular skill bookkeeping would make him suitable to work as a payroll clerk to work as an accounts receivable clerk if it is her understanding that that i'm focused on terms of indicating that there is no support for her opinion in that record and what miss bowes indicated that she identified for him that the bookkeeping was a component of we were supposed to give deference to to the commissions determination because they're supposed to be experts in these fields do you think a person who is supposed to be an expert in the field here is engaged in some quantum leap when  call service representative my understanding of that would be that this person is receiving calls from customers for companies addressing concerns ok taking down that information in real time and both justify what we're looking at you ability to retain information in real time and then use it but in a in a critical manner when a person is working as a call service representative this is a it and julie bowser also indicated that this is a gentleman who would not be able to perform well in situations that involved him to a bank where he did not do well on time to ask a call service representative is exactly that submit to support that when you have a customer on the phone it's either desiring information right away or hot about some issue because there aren't happy with service or a product that a person has to have working against the commission finding he could be a payroll clerk or another where is exactly the same argument that defeats what you just argued to has a macaw service represent it's a it does move the case into a different category from a tele disability and then the question becomes are there jobs that are available and my whole premise in this appeal is that the information that julie bo used to develop her opinion that there were jobs available was based on information and an understanding that that was wrong and because that information is wrong it's my