MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
that they were just trying to work this out they were trying to help and i don't see that as being an authorized they should just sell we have the security interest it's a very to me that this is the whole in due course argument is all about the searches and whether you were required to use the word right what you didn't present what i suggest perhaps upon the quote effective work insufficient name search that it not the bankruptcy judge placed weight of the fact that a search of j determination of a lack of commercial reasonable most based that determination whether it's a binding factor of losing the war on both the search and what what was done here in the face of considerable business problems that you had to know j t that there was searched it in fact the there is no question when you read the bankruptcy judges opinion his his only easily over whether a all the searches that came up afterwards that are in the records show j t p three inc on a on a on a lean that had been terminated so that let's assume  before we go back and answer my question the one i gave you initially didn't the bankruptcy court err in finding that while we all had no knowledge of the factor let me let let me ask you about the testimony with reference to the four officers all while who were authorized to receive and indeed did receive phone confirmations in substantial detail of one hundred and ninety nine transfers of over a million dollars correct that the bankruptcy  and the district court don't refer to the phone confirmation which are in my view and and those four officers mr ranson good testif that a factor was involved and the name of the actor was yeah and a factor deals o that that's assuming what what we're talking about is not a legal issue which was not forthcoming at least not in a way that was understandable to me of you you were not suggesting or that the bankruptcy court made any factual determination let's go back to the new jersey procedures that were not resent it the bankruptcy court wasn't under those procedures of the search appropriately the search that was the searches that were done appropriately designed under new jersey law i mean if if those procedures had been before the bankruptcy court would not the back of see judge have had  somehow they did the searches they didn't come up so now you're saying they should have done and you talk about subordinate groups yeah but they had to know there was a security hearing and then they didn't from the searches how what other steps application they didn't require anything on the application with reference to law and once they entered into the agreement they did the searches and nothing came up about law and now you're saying it should have been a lot more investigation then they would have found out and
money's not gone it's one thing to take twenty thousand dollars and put it on the red sea no and lose it in the court says you know we're going to take another twenty thousand off what you would have got because you blew this money but here she's still got the real estate but i don't believe that they did right and you believe that it was going through irreconcilable break let's talk about the ninety five to two thousand and one when the tax liability occurred what was the irreconcilable differences in the marriage that statement and i wish she also made the statement that they didn't live separate lives previously throughout and it is it's not the point of  early in the process of yes and as stated in the dark days that marriage was bringing damn over six years and here to raise over four years i mean i guess you could argue any merge ins up and divorce was breaking in those cases the spouse that didn't move out of the american president in the severson first district case fifty eight thousand dollars were considered to be reserved reasonable living things to support the jerry's insurance business at the end of the trial he was earning over one hundred thousand dollars a year for the insurance business at one time he stated there was a high value of one hundred thirty five reshaped greece in arguments council we will take the matter under
inspectors covered case took a bit what happens is there is a block of coverage that's available the claims in the block of coverage and so there are multiple years with multiple policies that are triggered it's often the case that the policy over doesn't need all liability of the defendants who are already ok what determines it in the extent that its contract language incorporated into their policy i mean what these policies are is instead of having a twenty page policy the access policy will just be one or two pages that allow the decoration page with the limits the cost of it those types of things and they're all just saying step back in the policy line if you will say we're going to use the same policy as the primary or the policy underneath the if they're just about about the the line or that you could get the idea that it could bring in the absolute assurance on the third party planning doesn't work and the reason why it doesn't work is because of the alignment requirement that the court has to go through if you don't have any other absent defendants in the case they're not bound by any decision of the dish to court if the exclusion is how to be invalid and then because of or other insurance causes and because of or missed out nation among other  that they were not diverse to turn up and they were diverse but not of course they had to be dismissed by the plaintiff that's what that's why this whole issue came about where all sixty conference and found out the granite state was on not the first to have to be dismissed  hopeful dollar more that makes a lot of sense that's not the case when you have access insured in the first compas decision this crew recognize that the station name and describe it is critical complicating factor being get access insurers and you on it was cited by the other side in support of this provision actually supports your position because what the judge better said in that decision is that there was a threshold liability issue oh well let me back up that was an initial lawsuit thirty six of the pending there is according to a mate at home you know they can pick and choose and they can go to any insurer but you can't spit over assurance which is what they're doing here because granite state which is dismissed defendant now
rehab the building for the simple purposes of flipping it the people before you or the people you going to be dealing with during this party rise during the construction rise and add to this building this project i'll complete describe and what is approved will probably set the stage for what may possibly happen in the future simply stated everybody in this room as well as my clients need to get this process correct and this product correct be included as part of the project area under specific conditions i might like we need to make considerable time as to that building and we believe that what is being presented it is considerable improvements to the building there were a badly by the community go up community opportunities group as part of the left wing station trial now this is not a westwood station bright color there are a number of statements that contained in that independent report that are applicable across the board shown here the other building is the house is located here and that's pretty much the existing condition we'll be actually supplementing with the additional linsky as peter mentioned
pay for the damage right now cause i'm broke but if you let me wash dishes or something like that wash dishes you've broken every good enough like many talk about washing them and from whom do you expect to collect this well come on let's get this over with well i guess i had better get started to think this a shade here i said private i got a proposition i think might be might be interesting to you stephan in the back room but i still think i was a fool to let you talk me into this thing of all of weak minded ideas and all just  all right boys you stopping right down the road always want your passengers come on come on out of there much different  did my restaurant genius i hope not how do you suppose he's getting along he'll be all right don't worry you don't think anything could happen to him do  right
they was a little painful
start getting beyond my control you see but there's been a lot of mysterious robbery right here in my county and that's again why i don't want more annoyed folks who beginning to talk about did die or where i have committed no crime anywhere in the past year yet i am reputed to continuously hold up and rob many people these believe me most in fear i am no longer a bad man killed that man to get the wife i'll bring it back carry my father inside and don't think i'm afraid to shoot i wish you would believe that i had nothing to do with killing your father we're sure there's a killer loose in this country we're not accusing you we're just that if you ain't mind this is better than finding a killer you killed my father and i warn you while leaving the door i've been thinking over what happened that night and i can understand how you feel i have no reason for harming you you can't can everything why did you come back ruth you were wrong about the murder if you go and you took away from that stranger it was a forty five and fully loaded gun that killed your father was thirty i thought i'd never have to admit it but i'm sorry but you sure took a lot of convincing i got a good job as foreman waiting for me but i kind of like this
good evening it is six zero four our own august seventeenth two thousand and fifteen we are here for the richmond water and sewer commission meeting start with welcome to members of the public as well as members of the commission  ministration are there any comment from the public here this evening confident those drains that were put in just in case won't see a lot of water that's a nice thing all the material has been brought up side they've got a temporary access road built up with a temporary storm wall down near the road and they've started laying the based on anyth actually relocate that building from where it is now up to the old which is up by the fifty thousand reservoir a couple good reasons for doing that one is a line of sight you've got a clear line of sight from that building which houses tank access isn't as good at that side but this is a building that you're going to frequent you're not going there every day so that's not as great an issue there's a power pole right next to where that the building is proposed to be in the change order so it's a quick drops are just around the building it's an increase in contract price of about six thousand seven hundred fifty dollars not a huge price and i think they were generous on giving of easy to explain just because we're going for once you know there is a little bit longer water service because we're running a three quarter inch water line to that building in whichever location so it's about ninety more feet of water service we do have to cross out you with it with a ditch  try to get the respond back could you remind us we were if i recall somewhere about halfway towards our target right he had said in july he had fifty percent on says we need one hundred so concern that we haven't really had direct communication so i'm thinking jeff it's probably hoops us to call mr brown this week and to remind him if he's  other to his representatives but it would have been nice to have some sort of meeting with him and i know he lives in florida but maybe a phone meeting with him about it and he got you know what his concerns  chemicals that looks good thirty two hundred dollars and they come right when we put a purchase order against it covers so nothing striking i guess you know get more interesting for the into the year  yeah i'm looking at the water news or receipts which as of august fourteenth work twenty four point five percent or five today and sewer those twenty two point seven eighth was twenty six point four this is not bad considering there's still another six weeks left before water bills are  pool so when do you think we'll be ready with last year
trial and that must include not only the state probably of it evidence but also that evidence that was admitted in here and all of that evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the state in determining whether any out of that testimony the only proper conclusion and the one that judge jury rationally reached was that the victim's burn injuries were from the forcible murder the question at that point w explanation that defendant was not aware of the injuries at the time they occurred yet he took no steps at all to obtain medical treatment for injuries that would ultimately result in in patient care for the victim for more than a month in we were required to consider improperly admitted evidence along with the other of course so why did the appellate court believe more identification evidence needed their statement indicates that they believe that the the one i d d although improperly admitted was not enough i just i mean every difficult scene out that's looking at it in the testimony regarding the statement was that what he said nurse i'm going to tell you something my dad was the one for hot water on my buttocks while i was in the tub she didn't ask for you know details regarding siz that those are three pieces of evidence just looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the state but that is insufficient what more was required well your honor says i the best the critical thing here is that is that that there was consider the child your statement as essentially consisting of a couple of different assertions the key efficient here was that the six year old identified that other as the person in the room with him at that time who would burn you would fully concede that his
playing against the prosecutor and in that context it clearly differentiated between the absolute either while federal claims and the common law to offer him a public official immunity possibilities if we look at the common law as something that is not static and that can be adapted to different changing circumstances in society there is a possibility for gore to say well case i'm just going to the courts consideration i believe that the malice that the wind of the land now specifically is going to be enough to solve the floodgates problem it's not a common occurrence to charge or even if it's clear that the state's attorney is operating with malice he's a mean prosecution yes you're over so so so let's just i mean we can take it oh he's taking extreme sonority let's say the state's  calls a press conference and he says this man is my enemy he's been my enemy since i was in grade school far as i know he hasn't done anything but i'm going to charge you with murder and making defend so was charged with the car as a result of malicious motives or whatever you say there's no exception for that yes and i i would i would point the board to the wholesome decision in one hundred seventy decided to is probably rather aware but because of the fee shifting stature section ninety three gives a lot of the civil rights claims are filed in federal court there aren't that many cases that we've
issue of material fact in each of the
maybe it was in this case if it ever goes to trial but the question is what does it come yes what is it more likely is for and wouldn't that be more of the consideration that you know up front in this particular us not to use it for drugs so does that indicate that there has to be more in the complaint or more in the indictment or more in the statutory authority what does that mean w detail to decriminalize which isn't the purpose was to decriminalize possession of syringes by simply adding one more exception making this over g possession less than twenty simply another of suction certainly frustrates the purpose of decriminalization but the the state of the motion to reconsider in this case amended the  you know that beyond a reasonable doubt intended for the illegal use of cannabis and controlled substance so when we look to the nature of the option to whether that option was intended to be used as true or familiar well  sale or possession which would be the issue here are clearly beyond a reasonable doubt intended for the illegal in the law for the use of cannabis were controlled substance to this and all reasonable
but she's probably doing her job right you know we just don't know between parking her car and getting to the bus whether she's really an employee which is why i don't know what's so clear say time to go get her own car the split shifts i mean how would you characterize what let me i mean it doesn't work for the employer for hours and then she has time and then she goes back to work i mean what's w during those two hours she herself said she did not consider solve on duty ill normal trillium ploy is a truck driver he's over the road he's going from springfield to st louis missouri did they have their rule usually applies to the former who's got the plumbing trucked in all over the goodies in the truck parked in his house in the drives of the st job in the morning is not the guy
biological father of the child may have done harm to the child we needed needed in head and longer developing anything relating to those that we have complied with three for one
there was a medical exam penetration occurred early on in the really months little bit more than three months of sexual assault and abuse and he says that we tried this early on because of her we didn't do it so to say that this medical report which poses we happened in september and supposedly says that there's no evidence of any damage to dana's in september when this happened in june  time frame between the incidents alleged to have occurred versus when they were disclosed so i think that's pretty much deals with any allegation about said he didn't remember and i think they're hugely different it's especially important when you go on to what the defendant possibly out of the hearing  happened in two thousand and eight and certainly he has a very good reason to to remember every little thing happened in this case for the public defenders say six years afterwards that i not hear this case
that's not the same thing about his home somehow one of the things to question him will create a revolution in criminal investigation yes i'm i did you know i was watching because you've just come back from afghanistan how do you do how you do how did you examined the rooms a two hundred twenty one b big street that afternoon and promptly moved in on the following day i had at this point known sherlock holmes for over twenty four hours but the man's fantastic powers of perception coupled with the almost unpredictable magical mystery i decision was based on observation a logical deduction man had a large anchor tattooed on the back of his head this was visible from our window i admit i didn't notice at the time but since you details but i don't believe in the long before with the advent of there's no motive i found this girl with a knife and i have my brother lying dead on the floor i found peace on the flow i tried to help by stabbing him in the event of his death i imagine did i'm afraid young lady i have to ask you to accompany me to headquarters
beyond a reasonable doubt i think that we would need to have more evidence and that there are a bunch more  she did cooperate that aspect of the agent's testimony but th
so with respect to the question about whether or not counsel under which what the true strategy was and how this work that the experts that mr delaney had secured might testify or might have a kind of that he was not and might have counter and i was taking these drugs is it that simple that is not a difficult our threshold and if we're to say that every time someone says oh well i shouldn't you should investigat involuntary intoxication because i was taking all these antidepressants or other signature meds or who knows what medication might be under in in any circumstance it will not mean everybody would just if you could just physicians going to write that because then every like oh i need to warn you about x y z so to find that in a hospital record or a patient's record seems very unlikely i don't again i if we were  warned then we would happen obligation to look into that further but where the defendant affidavit is conspicuously absent and something simple that he has awareness why i absolutely without them after david are we left with i guess the inference that at times he was taking it at times he wasn't yes because the record is as i say that there are from you know i going back as far as and i went i have a number of examples but going back as far as on november of two thousand  you these reports now maybe they're not it's clear as would be sufficient at a stage three hearing but the issue here is whether or not it's a just so so any number of people are are in favor of the physician shouldn't there at least be now a geisha and that i was taking the medication as opposed to records say sporadic who were trying to encourage him to take it i believe
have no wish for the company about this yet they are not of the still comfortable chairs and the latest reading material for their convenience a club was started which for that its members from taking any notice of each other if  a member talked it was a black mark against him and three such marks rendered him liable to expulsion shelagh holmes was neither shy nor sour but he joined us and then his club because he found the atmosphere thing this your problem where you see someone from france came to see me on business as it turned out he speaks only french of course cut even read the label on a bottle of wine but to put it he's leaving to morrow pardon i prefer the shades drawn on this to do that but the good of you that's exactly the purpose forgive me but i have no intention of for meeting you to see the place to which we are being it is somewhat of a liberty i admit they make it up to you and they get out make never telling me is doing side and just on the other giggling with each question again and again as i asked him in different ways whether he would give in and signed a document again and again or i got the same reply  the shooting yes i thought you went to bed hours ago i couldn't sleep at all i can think of nothing but paul now michel even there's nothing to worry about but he should have been here two days ago he doesn't like politics do something like that something that happened to me and not since i wager anything that he was delayed somewhere on business then he would have written to me if i don't hear from him by tomorrow i would go i'll take you back upstairs a business but it would not be due out interest if you spoke to anybody about it therefore i am paying you a fee such as you have never thought to seep in your life it will be more the next time you come and from what i've heard i believe these may have come in handy  even the weather seemed to be against us and as we found our cabin started on our way it began to rain according to them just calculations we had a considerable way to go and we had to go fast if we would be in time down to the streets in the rain or a handicap that's true there's no point in lying but you couldn't tell him where we are and even the famous mr holmes could never do stat thief you can take me to jail i only tried to get what was coming to make i'll see that you do