look at this case until yesterday on the way out here and when i reviewed the hearing transcript and in the immigration judges decisions what occurred to me is that i think the immigration judges intend to make an at risk credibility finding is clear but the problem arises with the what in my view were the opinions that he formulated to to sustain that he used words like interestingly petitioner has failed to explain or the court  is quite puzzled or that a finding was troubling or that he found it odd i don't think that those kind of subjective opinions really lend themselves to substantial evidence review and so in additionally because the immigration judge did not reach the other asylum or we are withholding eligibility issues the questions of past persecution are well founded fear i would propose that the case  be remaindered under ventura for the i j a to make expressed credibility findings and address other asylum l ability issues well you never expressed credibility findings and address other asylum eligibility issues other asylum eligibility issues perhaps it would be helpful to you since we prepared for the case of judge silverman and i just mentioned to you a couple things that are on our mind i hope you're not going to tell me that you're going to find  government i think we didn't know what we're going to do i had a couple things that bothered me that one was on the picture showing one nine hundred ninety eight when it was when she says it's two thousand and one i didn't think that was that anything that the i g could hang his hat on because so many people have v c r s that flash twelve o'clock and they never do set up their cameras so that the automatic date feature works add they just don't do it so they buy the camera and it reflects the days the manufacturer defaults to i agree and there are a couple other things that bothered me one g was bothered he thought it was an inconsistency that her father she says her father introduced her to falling gong and he was following gong and then he wasn't anymore i wasn't practicing anymore and i didn't think that was an inconsistency i can see how a lot of people could withdraw from their religious practice when the government imposed the harsh sanctions that it does and a third thing that bothered me was  j thought it was inconsistent that in our own town she practices following going in the secrecy of her living room or her apartment but then she says she participates in this big demonstration and tiananmen square and  some regional capital i didn't think that was inconsistent at all if i lived in derby bill north carolina in one nine hundred sixty one i would participate in the march on washington but i wouldn't be too conspicuous about my demonstrating little birdie bill if i may i gree with your iris comment about the photograph unfortunately the immigration judge neglected to mention the fact that the petitioners witness basically corroborated that the photograph was taken on the day that she claimed that it was taken i remember that yes the the other two findings i think those go to what i was saying before that the immigration judge didn't really make a finding that could be reviewed he expressed an opinion that it's puzzling that somebody would do one thing and then do another thing i would have preferred a finding that it's not plausible or that he doesn't believe it or or something like as i say i wish i had been able to review this matter before i left home i could have made a motion to every man but yesterday it was yesterday was my day as you and i know long airplane trips have some advantages they do judge away  an express credibility finding and to address other asylum issues