our next case for argument is united states against  on march seventeenth two thousand and fifteen a holder police officer which is in lake county indiana was on i sixty five in jasper county about thirty five miles away from the city he was part of a task force examination he admitted that he had run the plate before he approached the vehicle he knew the car was stolen he knew who owned the car his wallet and the officer said i saw all kinds of card sticking every which way it was walt from there he has permission to search the vehicle allegedly both the driver and passenger suppression motion really made factual finding might my points only it is that this wasn't a normal traffic stop this officer was far away from his home city he was out looking for crime everything he did after he issued the ticket was an attempt to prolong the stop until he could find some reasonable suspicion the possibility that the cards were false but i don't believe that arises to a the possibility is not a reasonable suspicion and you're absolutely right your honor once the suppression hearing was lost we were doomed to fail at trial no question about it but something the hammond division of the u s district court entails lake and port counties which between those two counties has an overall percentage of one thousand percent black population so i should have had approximately nine african americans in my entire  lead case where where does that figure come from approximate twenty percent or forty eight that's not the way statistics work you assume say an urn with eight hundred white balls and two hundred black balls and then you draw it random and you get a probability distribution of outcomes if you conducted that analysis i have not the probability distribution will assign a probability to getting zero black anywhere up to forty eight black but you don't in fact a statistician would tell you that the one thing that almost certainly won't happen is just to divide one number by another and you get that it's the same as the rule that if you flip a coin one hundred times you will not get fifty heads and fifty tails it just won't happen almost never i don't disagree with that at all i would think he would get  tails once or twice that of a hundred feet lead cases as both library from the government's brief going out is durham versus missouri and there they were able to produce to cystic so that showed that females were excluded far more than males over the course of the year because they were able to get those records the the circuit has just rang a challenge under the terms of the jury selection and service act  you know what i'm saying well then right we've we have said i think quite frequently that if the jury selection and service plan is proper and not contested the fact that a particular panel comes off with a disproportion by race or sex or religion or you name it just doesn't matter and that of course is what the district court said here and that's why i asked the question have you brought the challenge that the plan is defective or slanted or biased or anything like that well as i mentioned the there is an impossibility of doing that because there's no answer torie provision for exactly how that's to be done it's twenty eight u s c eight hundred sixty seven it tells you how it's to be done it's not impossible the clerk keeps no records as to race then the clerk is in violation of the statute now if you want to bring a challenge saying the clerk is violating the statute by not keeping records that might be a good challenge but you've already told me you haven't brought a statutory challenge to the way the plan is implemented proper for people to stop people for those kinds of violations rodriguez itself said that during such a stop you can ask questions about driver's license registration information that is what was asked here and while mr  good mr barry fumbled around and tried to find that information and it's just repeat the officer was perfectly free to ask as many questions as he wanted related or unrelated to the stop did so did not extend the stop at that point robin a ok so at any rate there's plenty of reasonable suspicion here there's plenty of consent here and there's plenty of traffic violations so there's no valid suppression claim on the jury selection issue or do it's done i mean he look at a broader range of of documents and to the extent that you know defense attorneys or others a commuter concern about that the court has done so to the extent that somebody wants to raise a claim or an attack on the jury will they can do so but mr defense defense counsel in his own brief on page ten says it is undisputed the instant been here was randomly selected from voter list pursuant to an authorized plan that ends the claim i have nothing further we were asked the truth from thank you very much counsel anything further mr bond well mr bruff we appreciate your willingness to accept the point that