no evidence that she wouldn't be persecuted if she went back to india in fact for the record is almost completely silent on the issue well what about the phone call of the father she's from what about the telephone call that she had with her father i mean there's  she asked she asked her father about what was going on back home but seems more of a personal phone call in fact there's nothing said that she would suffer persecution or that the police were still looking for well that's one way to interpret it but is it another way to interpret what's going on back there and the father doesn't say they're still looking for you couldn't think reasonable finder of fact conclude that you know they're not looking for any more grant that you could interpret as another way but don't we have to find that nobody could interpret it otherwise  that the police never came back to her home to harass her family and enquire into whereabouts that bribe does not suggest however that the police would not be interested in her if she were to return and yes if there is nothing that if they found her they were not persecuted it only says that after because they knew that she wasn't there they had been paid money and yet this was her hearing with two years after the last time her last name was two years after the last time the police come to her home there is no evidence that the police  so before this court she is not entitled to other forms of relief because as the immigration judge terms she does not have a well founded fear of future persecution because the records of courts that's germination this court must affirm her lies that arise because nothing compels reversal i think this case comes down to two factors and considering those two factors i think it's important to remember that the police's initial interest in this car was not because of an allege the two points i'm going to get to and those points are that the evidence that social stop coming to our parent's home stop looking for coward her father paid them stop coming in the country conditions evidence that  himself so the immigration judge was correct in our cars application because she does not have a wealth and if your future persecution how i'll grant that her testimony varied as to when the last time the police came to her parents home i page one fifty eight of the records she police came through three times after she left for the united states but then on the very next page of page one fifty nine she clarified and said well actually they didn't come after i came the united states and in fact she she said page one t one sixty the police stopped coming after father paid them now it's interesting to note that i know this morning that fisher talks about him as a bribe at page one fifteen out of the record she said that it's not a bribe and not exactly familiar with indian i do know that what she said was it's not a bribe it's probably not and i understand your point there's something odd about these cases though and so requiring somebody to show that they're still looking for the person who's fled the country now pardon i don't believe that's what the testimony was at page one sixty seven of the records he said that the police that she was in whole sharper like the city correctly when her father made the payment and she said they didn't come after that well she spent at least five more months in the country right now could have found her and they certainly knew where her parents were so they didn't we and now i don't like you living out in the open she was on the lam i believe i believe that's the case your honor all that means is that they didn't find her well when they couldn't find her before they took her father into custody and he told he told them where she was literally knew how to find her and after he paid them not to look for her anymore not to come to their his house anymore they stopped not just an ordinary dissident who is working for a separatist state she's a witness to a crime in the country conditions don't speak to that her situation is unusual i think i can speak to that and i think i can explain where i think the immigration judge is going in a few years and that's why i said that we have to remember that the reason the police were initially interested in mistrial was because she was a witness to to a today there are the rich the country conditions might explain why the police would not feel the need to put the pressure on mr karr anymore if the militancy related reviews are and then the law and order situation but i don't see anything in the country conditions report that says that i'm sorry i don't see anything in the country conditions report that says that as a result of the easing of conditions in punjab they're no longer the cops are longer that's all it is that used to be in solving unsolved homicide your r k two thirty nine the record the commission's report says that the militancy related abuses are in and that's the abuses by the police related to their investigation of militancy so that explains why the police would not be going i interpret that to mean they're no longer cracking down on people testimony wasn't that they started to imply that she was in league wins with the militants and so if they are infusing a political opinion to her and yet the militancy related abuses have have come to an end then one would have to conclude that that their interest in her would would certainly come to an end especially when we have the testimony that her father has paid the police to stop coming to look for her and in fact we know that they have stopped going to look for and that's the point that i don't understand and they there's no evidence of the police are even aware that she left the country there's no evidence that they stopped looking for work because she left the country the only evidence we have is they stopped looking for because they were paid and because we can we can see why they would also no longer be interested in her because