chair forty eight hours in advance at seven o five we have we're going to do a board reorganization which we do at the after the election every year seven ten we have visitors from the piccadilly pub to discuss the liquor license that was continued f the just be a thirteen budget so before we begin you have the pledge of allegiance linda i also wanted to take the time and the opportunity to thank larry harrington larry was our chair for the previous year you just served three years i want to thank larry and his wife judy for serving as a good friend of mine and i've learned a lot from larry he's  very good at the financial side he was strong leadership and we went through a very difficult time for about a year six months or so in the casino and like i said to larry we're on different ends of the issue always had the most respect and his leadership throughout this it was a very difficult time and it was a very very well attended election and he came out on the losing side but i wanted to thank him for his time and also want to another friend of mine martha slattery martha slattery is one of the longest elected officials from the school committee she was willing to stick her neck out even though she was on the school committee to sit at the selectmen stable in the works full time and she has a full plate and she had the time to do this and it was a very difficult time to make your opinion known there was two conflicting sides there one back and forth and a lot of respect for martha in a family for doing that out of the eleven i also want to thank we had a tremendous turnout this year we had a little over six thousand people show up on the sixty percent of the voters i'm sure it can be argued for years to come if it was a good thing or a bad thing on the outcome but the fact that so many people came out and gave their time to support both sides i hope it doesn't fall short and stop there we have a town meeting next week tuesday  so if there's two hundred fifty three hundred people and we're scratching trying to find a quorum something's wrong so if you pretty if you thought enough to participate and you were that passionate please continue because a town sure could use the the effort in the ambition  i also wanted to give a thank you to the craft organization from the view from the beginning it was reported that if the town did not want to casino then they would respect that and earlier this morning after the election it was evident that the town did spoke did speak very loudly on the casino and they did follow their word mr craft craft organization and steve went in his organization made the announcement today that they respect the voters and they decided not to pursue the casino so that it'll put a quiet and a calm back to the town appreciate that and i thank him and also extend we do want to work with them as hard as we can to realize as much benefit on route one and it is any business that they want to bring in that's palatable with the town we work very hard so thank you to the craft organization and  lastly it's been a difficult year we have a new town manager that's a year and a half into it we've set up some pretty ambitious goal pretty ambitious goals and objectives we've changed a lot with put departments together and we've got a lot work to do some excited for jenny and the rain to join in on that effort over the next year and hopefully collaboratively work for some some nice success and some some future success in the town so thank you for that  so that's what i have to say we have some reorganization but i think i'd be remiss if i didn't ask anyone if they want to add something after these few months of campaigning what jim i just wanted to start off by thanking all of the voters in foxboro who came forward so appreciate you coming forward and participating on monday yesterday it seems so long ago and  wanted to thank all of you for making that effort to come out this was a very important vote to the town of foxborough and certainly i'm so appreciative of the support that i was risk that i received as a result of your votes i want to thank everyone who helped me get to this point my campaign team was invaluable the work they did was tremendous and i appreciate their work i look forward to working with everyone on the board collaboratively this year and we have plenty had of us i think you know coming up with new goals and objectives will be a good priority be to be working with kevin on and i look forward to that and again just wan all the voters who came out yesterday appreciate the outcome thank  you i also want to thank the people of foxboro who provided me with the opportunity to serve the town and i'm very happy to join the other members at the table to work on the issues facing this town member of the board that's lost an election his wife judy have done so much for this community and never be forgotten and i'm sure in some kind of a capacity in the future we'll see larry in active in some kind of role in this town again i've been with linda now for so many years on this board back after tree a reprieve you're like a sister to me i appreciate everything we've ever worked on together i want to keep going voted on an issue of a casino i think they took the thing this tell more lies clearly now is that they didn't want to be a hosting community for can see you know i don't think the proposal was of a part of it for the people that voted against it that's my opinion has not been easy for easy for any member of this board and it's definitely not been easy for me our families have taken a beating the community taken a beating but we had a lot of support and i hope this years we can all start to come back becoming educated on the issue and for the six thousand one hundred ninety six voters who came out in force to vote yesterday and we'd also like to thank mr kraft for listening to the residents of foxboro and for his generosity to the town we look forward a continued positive and productive relationship going forward in many ways we believe as a result of this issue the town is stronger than ever it was clear or it is clear the residents on both sides can agree that we all love foxborough we look forward to building a better future together in this town that we're proud to call or home thank you stephanie anybody else who want to share speak was damaging the craft group d and the people who supported it was why i voted as i did yesterday however i'd like to follow up on mark's comments and that forty percent of the people voted for this casino ok and they really truly believe that this was in their best interest and they are hard and it's going to take a while to heal that hurt and so i asked the board  and members of the tent and the rest members the town to include myself to keep that in mind that these people are going to be hurting and suffering for a while and as some of these people are some of the most vulnerable citizens on the lower economic scale i hate to say it but it seems to be true so please keep that in mind and again if there's anything i can do to help this town or anything like that please feel free to ask thank you thank you mike there's no standard of behavior anywhere that we can find so i spoke with all of you say musical part about it either personally or the board when each one of us chairs four years later i think that we should address that so that we can avoid some of the friction that was clear the last six months at least also i would like to join my voice thinking larry and it's and for what he's done for the town  the thing that i liked about the kind it's night was the statement that was made regarding the crafter organization any business park i know we have there's a line that says friend and a line that says business partner all trust all of you that your interest is the benefit of the town if we cross the line between friendship and business allows us to assume that there is something cloudy behind a transaction i respect the need to be some private meetings between members of the board and business partners but we also expect to be transparency otherwise we are assume as reasonable people that something is not happening as critical when we see that things are not being done correctly or in the best interest of the town the same as we have criticized the other members of the board our support is not a guarantee that we're not going to be critical the owners l low voice ok who would like to start sure i'll start mr chairman just to update the board we were we were here back a few months ago discussing with you the status of the liquor license at the foxboro location and we explained to you that there was a tenant in place who had fallen on very hard times and left the premises on a very abrupt basis and left the owners with a large real estate tax bill water sewer bills and a host of other issues that we won't get into here but it did bring up the issue of what was the status of the license and where were we going to go from here i thought last meeting we discussed  owners coming up with a payment plan working with the town to come current on the the taxes on the water sewer and i can tell you today that the taxes are all up to date paid in the water sewer bill are up to all up to date paid and those are significant a to thirty thousand dollar range so payments have been made in the last forty five or fifty days so that part of the arrangement you know the owners of have kept their part on so we were last here you wanted to hear an update as to where we were so i what i would tell you is that they're actively working on bringing a new tenant in to that location or restaurant type of use or we're not at liberty to discuss the details but there is you know a fair amount of activity and a very very good situation we think evolving so we would hope to be back in front of you well before your in your renewal period at the end of the year with the transfer application so well before december thirty first well i've been assisting in the showings of the restaurant working with a working with it was a broker and i've had ten or twelve showings the last two or three weeks and they were very  update periodically as this moves forward so it's good to hear that you have some really solid prospects it's a tough time and so hopefully we'll see you well before december thirty first so i can have your business back you granted a six month extension which has approximately five more months to run on it my suggestion to the board would be no real reason to bring these gentlemen back sometime in the next five months presumably that there will be back here w a transfer petition and want one of their no i want to make off the boards tension there was not a legal requirement to bring the taxes up to date this is something that these gentlemen did in good faith with the town and it speaks extremely well of who they are from a corporate point of view and as a business partner with the town and i want to be sure that was brought to the board attention i think carol's very good things in the future you we have a couple more minutes before the next gender item you want to go to action items bottom six sentences down it states he said trader joe's not sell beer i think it's cold beer should be in there i thought this is not only  beer but does yes we have the information in a package but you want to give us an overview sure and i have a prepared statement that your example as outlined in our letter to the board we're asking for a waiver on foxboro by law fifteen a which creates a moratorium on street cuts within five years of we would like to convert our home at forty pleasant street from oil to gas heat pleasant street was paved in two thousand and eight and the moratorium expires in two thousand and thirteen when we considered purchasing our home in february of two thousand and eleven we believed that we had done our due diligence by there a fine with columbia gas that gas lines existed on both coasts plus and we were unaware that a moratorium on road paving existed our home is now eighty nine years old and basic maintenance issues have been neglected by previous owners we have been working diligently over the last year to restore it included in a long list of home maintenance items that have not been previously upgraded or repaired is an inefficient heating system the current boiler functions at only sixty percent efficiency i know our plan was to upgrade the heating system soon after we moved in when massif performed an energy assessment of our home in october of two thousand and eleven they determined that the carbon monoxide levels and the oil boiler flue were too high for them to insulate the exterior walls or increase the insulation in the attic these rules are in effect to prevent carbon monoxide poisoning from gases building up in the home we have completed repairs on the current boiler three times since moving in april of two thousand and eleven it is not possible for the current boiler to meet their specifications for carbon monoxide which prohibits us from insulating our home until we were place the boiler converting to gas will allow us to use a heating method that is more efficient less expensive and causes less pollution than oil by the time we get the permits quotes and financing in place to start the conversion we believe we will only be asking for a preview of a few months before the moratorium expires in and thirteen the gas man on pleasant street is located directly across the end of our driveway so the proposed street cut is only at the with of the street if a request is denied we will be forced to replace the current oil burner and oil tank with an identical system until the moratorium expires and then convert to gas in the future replacing the heating system twice wastes time money and the energy and resources used for constructing an oil burner and tank and plumbing the new system into our home in our attempts to solve this problem while respecting the town's moratorium we were a quest to dick a quote to convert to geothermal heat however our home is not a candidate for this heating method as geothermal heat cannot raise water temperature to a high enough level for us radiators although the winter of two thousand and eleven to two thousand and twelve was one of the warmest on record we struggle to heat our home to fifty five degrees fahrenheit due to the failing boiler and lack of insulation in the walls this puts our home at risk for  in addition to being terribly uncomfortable we hope you'll agree with us that converting to gas is the responsible choice and cannot wait one winter longer until the moratorium expires conversion will allow us to heat our home with a cleaning with a cleaner burning fuel wall so that we do not continue to waste the heat that the boiler produces thank you so we'll open up to the board but i just generally when we have moratoriums obviously we're responsible for the road to the longevity so when it's got full depth constructionism oratory means no one cuts into it so you don't have patches you know months later and on the other side if it sounds like a hardship that you want to go into the road before the moratoriums up stuff before going to the board there was some in the package that said we were going to get a report yes mr herman was the board every director was unable to get his inspection report done soon enough to get into your packages last week but he has done that and on line nine conditions which are fairly standard he has no objection to the request so long as it's agreeable to the applicant to the board under the following conditions first before any street opening is attempted columbia gas most attempt to use the old existing gas service as a sleeve for insertion of the new gas service plus a limited in the need for digging should it not be possible to use the old services of sleeve columbia gas most attempt to employ the trench those whole hawg to eliminate the need shall have an inspector on site during the work three before the excavation begins both edges of the proposed pavement opening must be sock cut through the full depth of the pavement have some make a clean break in payment for the  the trench opening must be sufficient to prevent the base material underlying the pavement structure from collapsing of sloughing off into the trench while the trenches open five all backfilling of the trench after insulation must be compacted and six inch lifts until the greatest one foot adjacent pavement after rolling eight and he sort of one of the trench area following completion of the work shall be repaired using infrared pavement maintenance to the satisfaction of the town of foxborough for a period of one year following your exploration and nine all costs associated with the above shall be and remain the responsibility of the owner and those are his recommendations and as i say it was a fairly standard industry practice when opening a new page prematurely questions from the board and no i guess i'd just like a copy of that i know it's come up before the folks on oak street but i think that it wasn't as close to the moratorium dave bylaw and it sounds like a lot of that is the reiteration we have previously asked them if they could use the existing pipe based on their records at this time they believe the pipe is too old if that the condition of it isn't satisfactory or the over it's a very simple process i have propane in my house all it is a thirty five dollar conversion piece for your gas so that you have an option here it's not like you're shut off roger because i am in the trays we do this all the time is i want to hundred percent global fill out that once the trenches escalated all the material that's in there i would want removed from the site gas pipes not even two feet down the ground is not a great expense your truck all  sign it works period we've had discussion with prior for numbers and prior d p w directives so the option is i agree with roger surprise the company wild who your plumber would tell you is it a situation where the gas company gives you the furnace if you change your now here i will but i just think i don't see a person your own some in reputable plumber from the that you can convert to propane for a while it does sound familiar we started this process a year ago and i got sidetracked by calling the never one point i was under the impression that propane was much more expensive but i haven't done much research into that so it's it's not that much more and i know for a fact but the thing is when you say from yes they're not going to be doing the work and i remember the trenches down the street a couple years ago from the sun quite some quadratics from the gas company was like a railroad track going down that road and guess you get pulled in by your wheel and how long do we have to take to get them back i think we had to have our state rep call our state senator call to get him to fix the road so it's not that i don't have any faith and i don't have faith in this sub contractor that they hired because they don't even go to the job so i would respect requests you have an option to go to propane for that moratorium and then you can move forward from there it's only a one year deal you signed with a reputable company in the area for one year they bring the tank they put it you might decide you want to keep his lot other alternatives to it and it's to me it's all safe but i would i would respect we deny your requests and with that option if you didn't have an option i would probably can see to you but there is an option suggestion too much short of the moratorium but if you if you if we approve this the moratoriums a couple months later i think if you waited a couple months and then they did the trench compact with global fill which is much more expensive and it's not going to settle or you wait two months you address the issue of saying precedence but you end up with settlement because of the actually roger do you want to come to the table  suggestion you respect the moratorium if you wait two months to get a better product a good point i'm confused where the two months is coming the moratorium is five years right long as a mentor moratorium and going on already since two thousand and eight so we have to wait going to be inundated with this in the future too and this because my concern also is we were starting a road program and we're getting funds now to do more and more roads so there is a concern that if there's a  advertise it in the in the paper twice almost like a public airing and i mean that's what we supposed to do i don't know if he actually did that and then it would alert people and you know the thing is when you live in town that's fine you know it's common you a precedence and this boy's ok we a lot of them you know we go we say no the next people and you know what they say what you said yes to them we're taking a good one and we're going to win open up the street so it's a very difficult position well it will happen there's no doubt about it the five year moratorium isn't the life expectancy of that pavement that should go at least ten years probably more so when we cut it we're introducing the failure of the history we're talking a multi hundred thousand dollars investment of the taxpayer so i'm really grateful that mark brought this up because i don't think we were aware of this alternative the hope i think would be that we'd make it with the boring device so that we don't have to cut the street at all as we really vibe is the bylaw but we don't want to cut that street for a decade if we get away with it because it will fail prematurely so that palatable going in that direction with the  time when we take a look at where the ide column is on all the war articles in the budget and with the borders on all the one article in the budget and if there are already differences we try to reconcile them happy to say that there is one singular difference of opinion on one article otherwise you are in one hundred percent so good a city on budget and warrant and my compliments to randy and his staff to all the department heads t advisory committee and to the board because this is a massive volume of work that the public never gets to see but it goes on to the entire one of it's literally hundreds of hours of work by a lot of people and it doesn't just happen by coincidence that we get to this point that's for sure so that's great news for one difference of opinion but i don't remember of the one i call number of the war nautical that would provide two ton employees who are deployed the difference between their town pay and their military pay you voted unanimously in favor to recommend the ad com split i believe it was six to five steve to recommend against so that is the singular difference between you right now i have reached out to the chair into the vice chair and got the vice chairman first to because i am a member of the national guard and am subject to the point of conflict at all with respect to recommending one way or the other and so i can't speak on a time meeting and i can't really speak on it in terms of making a recommendation but i am asking the chairman of the i would call to call the chairman of this board and randy will stand in my stead to see if there's any opportunity to reconcile that difference it would either be didn't see that i was at the er but we couldn't hear anything yeah i mean we talked probably four maybe four hours total this over two meetings and it was a lot of a lot of conversation and i think most certainly the majority believes that wouldn't would like to see these people made whole when they're deployed but there was there was it there were differences but there are some people who did not believe that so they were at least you know several members who just thought government shouldn't be involved in this but when you say made whole is that the pay that they're missing because yes yes they get some stipend from the government but no they tell me they get their salary when they're deployed and then you know turns out that i think the actual guard who are go on active duty they get housing allowance every day they do better than active military personnel ok so i think that gap is fairly small ok you know so it is but the statute specifically notes base pay to base pay so and it does allow certain factors to be put in there  that it's limited in terms of how it defines it so some of the benefits that military folks get when they're in the war zone don't add into the dog because frankly for the middle well war  something to the board it's going to help you out a lot because i'm a national guard and i'm i'm subject to this but i'm having paperwork prepared by town council which i'm going to sign to give to the board for swearing any benefit under this were to pass and the reason i'm doing out is because i don't want me to be an issue we have two employees who who are very young gentleman who will most assuredly deploy probably in the next year or two and will need this assistance i don't want the fact that i'm an old old national guardsman to get in the way of this so i'm simply going to remove them by having something prepared to say as if that's just not an issue and i'll sign it voluntarily forswear it that way that will not be an impediment for those young men who i think i think most people would like to take care of and it would remove that was an issue because i know it was an issue and i know it was discussed and very legitimately salt because on like these two young gentleman the difference between mine a civilian salary which because i'm a highly compensated executive in the civilian world and i'm a very low paid just on principle don't believe that this is something that our government should be involved in and then there's a number of people who believe who believe that there should be a way to make sure that you know these people are hurt when they're deployed but perhaps not you know not by adopting the state law but by adopting something that's foxborough specific whether that's possible or not you know we had that discussion that may not even be possible authority as a state  law and then you know then there were it was six to five and then the other five people and i should say if i was one of the five people so we should try to be neutral here so i'm i'm conflicted away also because i mean our board voted with majority against  but i happen to doubt it very the other five people i think were just we just felt that it was the right thing to do that's what we were yet we are being we have a meeting scheduled for right before a town meeting so if i guess that john wanted to have this brought up that would do it but i think you're meeting at the same time right the world will be posting a meeting for you at six o'clock and i have a further report to you on warran was passed and nearly in two thousand and four it was pounds for a period of time back in the first gulf war right and then it's on saturday and then it was passed again i believe it was in two thousand and two two thousand and three it's sunset and i believe two thousand and seven the rate it was extended to two thousand and fourteen now this law terminates in two thousand and fourteen so even if the tone were adopted it would only affect soldiers deploying prior to that date in two thousand and fourteen unless the legislature extended it again ok so what was a bad major concerns with no voters i mean i find this to be to myself a pretty much   and this is just something to me almost gets personal because i just don't believe in not supporting our troops in any way a condition at all right so a moral day coming it's something that i think this town needs to do and remember so maybe that you know the new information that mr pecos say that it wouldn't take advantage of this fight you know maybe john would then want to have a meeting and just  him i didn't decide to do and i just told you until just today and that was after learning that there was some concern that if i deployed that there would be a large financial exposure of the town and frankly i just don't however he wants to do it but it would that be allowed and he'd have to check to see if it would be allowed under the states that you yeah i suppose he does yeah yeah yeah you know and if you know i would i think it was brought in which apparently negotiated into the collective bargaining agreement with i think the firefighters and that was a new wrinkle on me i've no i never heard of that before unfortunately in brockton that's been a very significant bone of contention because employees of the school department the d p w the police department cetera don't have that benefit so it has been very controversial in brockton i certainly would not recommend a tear attention it's not a good way to do it because it you know you have to negotiate it with every single bargaining unit it's a very cumbersome way to go about business plus as a practical matter there is a very significant potential that one or more of these individuals may deploy prior to the opportunity to negotiate into a contract that would have to be not it's not a no but generally with the commonwealth provides a statute and what's called an acceptance statute meaning the state says here's a program we'll allow you to do but this is how we want you to do it and it's a yes or no you accept it or you don't generally when they do that they want to laurie to tell you your own program and the reason is because they say this is if you're going to do this this is how we want you to do it and they don't let you do it over here in the legislative history on this lots of towns and cities were doing something without benefit of legislation allowing them to they were frankly just paying their soldiers anyway and that wasn't legal but by the same token no one wanted to tell those towns not to do it i mean this is in the early days right after nine eleven no one was going to say the town shouldn't do that for the soldiers it that's what they wanted to do for the state did it and came along with the sort of package cookie cutter and said we're going to do it here it is so i think the prospects of getting our own local buy are pretty pretty dim but probably wouldn't do it plus remember they sunset this law specifically so that they say during this war this period of time you can do it for this group of soldiers by law wouldn't have a time period it would expire so again i think the prospects of getting it approved a very very dim any other questions from the i have had conversations already with jay perilous the biggest thing that i had the conversations over this when we first heard about this i had never even knew that this existed and my original thought employee would be better under this law which would segregate against his brother if they will both is discriminatory and shouldn't exist as written  like what kevin has described is absolutely true as far as the state as providing a statute adopt as a local option and we should either adopt this or not i highly recommend that we do adopt this  this is in the interest of veterans this is low cost to the town brockton has done has been a controversial issue within that community and unlike this two thousand and three contract it's probably there and that's discriminatory because you've got some employees in the same town that you know could deploy and get compensated and others not of similar  salaries that's discriminatory now as far as you know the state has provided this this statute which can benefit state employees county employees and also municipal employees that point i don't find this discriminatory at all this is something needs to go up to vote in front of tell meeting and you know i do believe that this is in the best interest of the community and this is also something that  we had discussed previously at the calm that is one of those fringe benefits that is offered as and can be seen as an enticement to attracting qualified individuals the folks that do look at fire department police department also teaching positions are coming from the military this is when they look at a town this may be the thing that looks attractive in one town and dissuades them from another town i think we should be that town that is that is taking care of our troops not putting their homes and families at risk should they be deployed to take a twenty or thirty thousand locally here but it would have to go up to the state house and into legislation cambridge did such a thing and it took a long time to get it in what they decided ridge was that they didn't just want to make up the difference between base salary and you know in base pay they wanted to compensate the full amount so they want to do something over and above what the statute was allowing i'm not suggesting we do this but i'm saying if you do something when his brother as such when i gave the example can not get that benefit understood i am asked to pay thank you so i think what we have is that we have a warrant article that we had not we didn't have all the information you shared it with us you may have not had the information he shared it with you i'm comfortable with my original vote i haven't heard anything else is going to sway me in this can come up on just about any  on in the event that perhaps it might make a difference that they might consider convening a meeting really monday night for the purposes of considering it and if that doesn't that would be wonderful if you could you make sure that your agreement is compatible with and they may settle they may not but they might not one fifty either collective bargaining statute requires if they settle prior to the town meeting that i reported to the board and at the board in good faith represent and support the contract at the town meeting for funding it is not buying the i've gone but it does bind us we the five of you and i are required to support  it now i know this was last minute i can't control that i always admonished the unions you know let's try to get this done a month or more prior to town meeting but it doesn't always work that way and sometimes when you get close is when the unions finally move and say ok we're going to do a deal now because we don't have to wait a year to the next town meeting to get any money out of that contract and that's just the way it like the binding works so i want to alert you to the possibility that one or two of those might settle and i'll be reporting to the this board monday night randi will go up the whole report to the ad com and then you know you know our our policy we had set a date your exactly what it was about two weeks before a town meeting that we would not entertain any agreements that came in after that date because we just don't have the time you know we'd like short and a week or two asking lots of questions such as the post twenty six twenty six in the foxboro legion post ninety three for memorial day celebration on may twenty eighth two thousand and twelve so what we saw more of the second  more discussion of those in favor and police chief o'leary acceptance of a six thousand six hundred dollars traffic enforcement grant to enhance traffic safety efforts in it and i read it this is from the planning board permission to hang banners from the fence around the common plane about a master plan consultants will be pretty will be presentation on town wide economic development issues on may twenty fourth thursday and to begin to remove the public safety building as we did for the master plan kick off open house in march we would like permission to hang the master plan banners it was hung in march with a smaller banner with information fourth meeting these banners will be hung in the same locations as in march adjacent to the community information boards at both ends of the common the benefit will be removed probably after the event occurs and i think that the playing board been working very hard on the master plan and also if you haven't picked up your annual how to report two thousand and twelve one of the nicest covers you'll ever see in this was by weber so i think there's plenty for everybody there i go i hope we give them up all this year and just want to draw the boys attention on the action items there were two settlements of lawsuits on very favorable terms and we've been able to achieve a lot of hard work just when the board to be aware of those and a third bullets he's actually been working on that but we had done it so recently i think we did it last winter that they declined they didn't want to do it again this soon but he's been kind of working on trying to convince them to do it as they  like we did before we actually save money on our insurance if we do it every year and we have seen what about the some of the labor bills you know there was something  time to bring up now at a new board yeah i've got to get in sync with kevin on how to put things on the agenda but at some of the things i would like on the air we're in the middle we started it with larry i think larry submitted his your performance review the rest of us i don't know if you sent it to larry yet but if you have not i didn't and it's like yes send it to me i'll combine them and i will put larry's innit jenny you haven't worked on the board to have a review of kevin meeting with whatever it takes to fill out the critique rate it score it give it to me out combine it same thing we did last year live an open meeting because there is issues and opportunities that were brought up at the end of the last session that we don't  forgotten other items i want to have national grid on here they've been working the tiles been working there's a five year plan with david brody walk me through yes i want the people to understand what's been happening since a power outages and intice a patient of the next winter and what shape or and i don't want to get forgotten and there's a whole bunch of other stuff there to get an agenda you board members wouldn't mind is ok with a chair if you would jot down or shoot me an email with any agenda topics that you want because we don't want anything to fall through the cracks and we've we've got quite a list of things and jim and i will you know we'll have to sit down and go through it and start making you know you'll have to start making some decisions about what you want to put on when because we' so larry put together the i think was larry that started it work very hard to get the goals and objectives set up so if you don't have a copy email it to you yeah yeah so there's forty odd goals and objectives kevin i supposed to be doing a monthly report where he updates the town puts it on the website and ice and then at the end of the year we have valuate it and we could keep it so before you have a meeting with kevin you should have that list and go over those to see i was doing anyways before so we need all this is actually good timing because some time it's not going to happen in may because your next meeting is overwhelm but probably june we have to do the new goals and objectives for the new year that's what i'm saying