the facts of this case there are three issues up the vision of property which involved the house the doctor every part of the  ah there are two children born in the marriage one had severe problems when i was born up to about five or six that child was name this child and also the baby's costs custody was not an issue the petition of the respondent agreed custody to she's a good m alone that the husband is going to have to retire about position now to earn one hundred the money she makes because of the efforts from contributions of the respondent she was born in romania her that she was earning per month just before she came over twenty dollars a month us dollars she married that ever heart she came to this country now she was licensed in romania and was a general practice and she came to this country and had to go through a series of tests to be to be licensed in her showing there were to go getting test forms helping her pass the english exam she successfully passed everything then she wanted she was having trouble getting into a residence he suggested that she look for the name across the country and a resident any residency for a romanian doc she did find one or he found it in ohio and they contacted the romanian doctor and he suggested to her whether she said this to him or not that she felt she was being discriminated against because she was romanian so she went on this this was a fellowship it was sort of an added a certificate to help her get a resident so she spent i believe three votes for four months in ohio that she's not a tremendous mother that she's wonderful caretaker for these children especially all the others possible but taking all of the we only rely and i think it's a good reliance on the contributions to her and the future earning capacity that she's going to have  she was in this country and that was brought to the attention of the trial version no proof could be attained as to that but maybe one petition was filed st louis she told him that i no longer want to be merry you all right no longer need we we the family have decided we long no longer need you now that was the oldest who's now of seven was actually born prior to my client started her position that she was in missouri for which was a paid position and she did support herself and that isn't a record and she supported the child there were some discrepancy in the testimony regarding how often time everhart would come and see her in st louis my client's testimony was it was maybe weakly her parents did come to care for luke who was an infant at that time  and in terms there was arguments that my client had sent two hundred dollars a month to her parents which she had done over a fairly significant period of the marriage all the testimony was that that had been that it had all ceased of time contributions to marriage like everything arabs the both parties contributed to the marriage and i certainly don't have a heart to throw monica to certain things and so forth monica and her testimony certainly tonight the number of hours he indicated that he assisted her in studying for exams and really by the time she came to the country that's what it was all about was studying to pass for english proficiency exam because she was that's up to now her first language and up testing these clinical tests thirty five and forty thousand dollars a year for and with respect to these residency she provided insurance for the entire family both for john ever herself and his children she didn't have children at that time in addition before she started her residency and while she was studying for these exams she worked for memorial medical center as a c n n a certified nurse assistant she works in a very tough job that we don't normally think  lady who came over here and it was not a case where she was just taking care of she contributed contributed substantially to this marriage one of the things that talk council didn't address is that don everhard in  applications that you filled out to the bank i believe one of them was in two thousand and nine valued his the building that his medical practice was in which he got rent for but the business paid rent to him or that i was close to two thousand dollars a month was paid in rent to him for that that with respect to on that building it was worth three hundred seventy five thousand dollars he said that his equipment was worth eighty thousand he said it very substantial accounts receivable he said that the business itself was worth seventy thousand dollars in twenty ten there were deposits into his bank accounts of in excess of one hundred forty three thousand dollars so in terms of don everhard saying that he's poor that he doesn't have income it was very hard to get a grasp on that during the course of the case because we have him saying in a bank application that his income is one thing we have thank you have shown the other thing we have a very financial affidavits that decreasing mortgage warning were oh i don't know i don't know i do know that he's getting fifteen hundred dollars a month in social security benefits in addition to whatever money council is talking we have a child here that my client has full custody of two kids one seven one almost five this five year old is extremely disabled he is he's nonverbal he's a four year old who non verbal cannot drink out of a cup he has conditions visually you see him has a big head it's a condition called dyspraxia he has strong business he's he's  very substantial commitments from my client in terms of time that she works say she works part time and she works at mcfarlane's because that job gives her the flexibility to tend to the needs of this child and so yes everhard is sixty five years old we have a baby up a four year old who is severely disabled and my client is basically the lifeline who should who she is is take care of this little be in the in home care so that my client can work is about two thousand dollars a month that other little boy who by the way has had cancer he's had serious problems also but he's doing well now he goes to a monastery school that's eight hundred dollars a month so when you do the analysis of my client's cash flow there are three different therapists tend to this little boy lot of that is out of pocket special foods because of the necessary necessity of trying to to balance ok we do have a sixty five year old dad but we also have a fifteen year marriage we have an established practice he's had it correct practice forever we have a mom with custody of two little boys who has a long way to go and i think what the judge was trying to balance that i'm not going to order child support but i'm certainly not going to order her to pay me and it's when virtually every time she makes is needed to support this expensive household and not expensive because they go on vacations  he applied for social security for himself and therefore the children got social security and under the social security rules social security monies are paid to the stoical parent and the judge me very clear that he wanted the social security was the amount of time that was expended it was openly declared in court not by mr castello but by another attorney working for kind of her heart that there was an attempt to deport my client that they were they were actively trying to get her deported from the united states there when they said oh she was for absolutely here she's been a citizen since two thousand and one this case was delayed trial was delayed because they said that they were going to go get documentation  the fact that she's here illegally and that they want these children to stay here and they wanted her to court and the judge did and that's what he was referencing the last part of his of his decision was that look i'm not going to order her to pay somewhere to my client so there were there were there was a lot i believe that when into the court ruling in the manner in which it ruled in this case if there are any questions i am