mr stein e found credible would clearly qualify for sound based on three instances of confrontation with the authorities in india and torture now the immigration judge finds him not credible primarily because documentation that mr signy submitted which came this in this case mr signing in terms of his own testimony doesn't contradict himself most of the country directions if they are contradictions come from other documentation he was referring to the police looking for mr signy at that time and one were unable to find him so there's another disturbing issue that the immigration judge doesn't account for in terms of that are that are there  points in the application there's there is proper documentation moreover the i one forty is likely to be approved because the rains and that's not correct you do there was a lot of law and arguments that was raised there but to make a determination that there's that there's froid without having a hearing on fraud seems to be dates that he attended college which she found material because his entire claim was based on his membership in the all india speech student federation which he claimed he joined and was active in during his college years and in fact immigration judge even specifically said that although he cleared up the date that he believed he entered that he never changes if he left and it was just inconsistent with his other testimony regarding the activities with the a very reasoned decision by the immigration judge chinos on numerous occasions where he was given the opportunity and he did he were offered explanations that were now reasonable or he could not offer an explanation judge also found that suppose the three arrests he not only doesn't let he said that now we're talking about july twenty third one thousand nine hundred seven when he filed this complaint he says in the past two or three years which covers the entire period of time during which the issue of the driver's license of the judge specific leaks that it brings into question this man's very identity what was missing from print page was missing there was no the license should have had signature across the picture suggesting that the picture has been replaced because there was no signature across it and that was one of the instances in which mr sandy was given the opportunity to explain the problem and he could not explain it he had no rational explanation for that i could go on i mean the evidence supporting this judge's credibility terminations simply overwhelming they all went to the question of whether this man belonged to the and i asked us that which was the entire basis eligible for relief the board will reopen this is a case or a man came in with an application and first of all his motion simply said i moved to reopen here documents gave no reason and just submitted the documents that documents  riddled with errors anybody trying to adjudicate this these actions on their face would be unable to do so has a number was wrong it claimed that his his underlying immigrant i if i forty five which was the adjustment application claim that the immigrant visa petition had been granted and had not been granted it claimed he was given asylum he had not been given asylum and i disagree with my colleague he claims that that that the court found thrawn in this case what the government you belong to any if you belong to any type of group or organization anywhere in the world he says no despite the fact that his asylum application was based on his membership in a political a student political organization the question is on a motion to reopen did the board abuse its discretion in that did they act in an arbitrary irrational manner that was contrary to the law this gentleman put in front of the board and application  the agency could not have adjudicated on its face for multiple reasons that the government pointed out the board certainly did not abuse of discretion when it's night his motion to reopen on that basis he then moved to reconsider circuit i'm sorry one of i'm sorry one of four where he knows the ninth circuit pending ninth circuit protection so it would be impossible for mr signed if mr representing his status and and that's if he had put in there that his ninth circuit petition was pending at that time  last case this morning is zero three one seven zero nine five