was required to prove that she knowingly failed to perform acts which she knew were reasonably should have known were necessary to maintain the health of an hour early person and in this case that was richard brown and that her failure to do to maintain his health and i guess that was the reaction of other people who knew she was a substitute caregiver she only cared for the browns twice before when when richard run son in law came home and found him on line and then when his daughter came home two hours later and good him her husband told her what happened she didn't take you know all the circumstances were saying she was he was he fell on the floor he was on the floor and she went checked out and she was sleeping she didn't think that it was necessary for to for his help that they get immediate emergency care i mean if you're looking at a refill what a reasonable person should think under these circumstances you don't you can by what people other than who knew him much better thought as walt what about the fact that one of the reasons that chris the son in law i believe said you know he's ok  your clients and will if you've been on the ground for a little while then she said she extended it for a little longer and eventually she said i think up to two hours never really never really identifying  actual hours sushi's changing her story isn't that some evidence of i'm concerned i did something wrong i mean this wasn't the right thing to do it may be a concern in hindsight because of what happened the next day the next day up and richard does show signs of being in physical pain and so yes he may be concerned as think it would be in hindsight thinking oh my gosh i made a mistake in judgment but th back to bad if he had known you know for him hours had passed hand knowing that and still saw mr brough in the same condition and mr brown just said i was just really tired and i want to go to bat i mean i don't wife who has severe all timers and by all accounts required more care call her way she finds that she's soiled herself she has to clean that up she says that takes some time all this is happening in the first period then with mr brown and he does and i think it's a reasonable understanding she understood this instruction to mean that she should wait for to chris because he would be home shortly and then he would help her and it as soon as he got home as soon as he got home she called him and he came over condition at the end of four and a half hours nobody at the end of the war i have powers nobody thought that it was necessary to get him on emergency care and it nothing leading up to that for a and i think in her mind she she thinks maybe i can still try to get him she continues she repeatedly tries to help and she gives some nourishment i mean i just said this is not criminal this is yet again and i think it is easy to say efforts to take care of him on the stair was nothing about her actions that shows anything now was towards him she she she did the best she could under the circumstances that were confronting her i mean the fact that she might never call me on position the entire four and a half hour period of time and in fact it wouldn't make sense because if he that was able to provide him with water and food he certainly would not have been in that position so there's simply no evidence of that to call on her saying that did not i have this is that he's a criminal knowledge this is not a case where she had a criminal intent this is a case of hindsight mistake in judgment it was an error in judgment that was being human and ammar to tend to the wife when she calmed down she said and when she testified on direct she said it took some time and the state wanted to clarify and asked was it less than an hour she said less than an hour so i mean it could be anywhere i assume and anywhere from thirty minutes for a forty five minutes was an hour to be fifty five minutes but you know it was during that first window of time of her continually trying to get him up and i'm writing him nourishment and