MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
knowing that he could be placing his client under suspicion because his client is the friend of the woman who is the i guess wife of the defendant so he's bringing forward  difficult situation and there's also a child somewhere involved no child of these parties but this is nicole is allegedly dropping off her child to visit with the defendant i mean there are reasons there he's he's creating he might be trying to make a deal but he's creating a real there global situation where he's not only giving his client may be ideal but he's also saying he looked he could have a problem if he's going out with this woman but do the shooting at the time four of them actually saw it the other two said yeah we saw the victim going out the door we saw the defendants standing here and then we heard shots for actually testif the bedroom you got other people talking about the disagreement between them and this is it you've got four people absolutely identifying the shooter in the victim seen it saw get this evidence is clearly harmless if you means that he's going to absolutely line i think is incorrect i mean there's a difference between stealing some evidence and lying and here we're constance said was this is what i was told by these people says for the search warrant for the complaint do we know at the time the police officer had any knowledge that the reason berber nichols was there to bring the child up the defendant do we is that information  came out of trial yes do we know that mr mahoney conveyed that information to the police officer you know aside from aside from once in the affidavit we don't know we only know what the police officer decided but in the a that's not the ultimate factor in it as they said the the fact that they were suspects might make it even more true that they were in direct the police to this information to clear themselves daughter since she had this information but didn't they know at the time that she had seen evidence of the robbery in her father's ring or some measure of jewelry and she c indication on how she came upon this information the family suing the father going to the police a few days after the often said my daughter says she knows these people and these are the people but there was apologise for that what could mr mahoney know done here although to me things better how about bringing the witnesses to the police for the police to talk to the person but calling the above is the problem here mr we suddenly have to have some hearsay speak filtered through every kid for their interests he's i mean you just inherently assuming that the lawyer it's filtering misinformation that he's taking something that was less than true filtering so that it is now true
in this case it did not come acceptable to the parent because the period as a common obligation to support my property however which is belongs to the wife either prior to the marriage or the other day when i began thinking by what i was going to say to you this morning in wargaming i was attempting to identify for myself a find it curious and interesting that the statement in page in reply brief is the best summary of plaintiff's claim because historically if you review this case you will realize that when plaintiff initially file the claim with regard to the mismanagement of files in two thousand and five microns was not even name do and as they said i think the only time that we get to that point is when we reviewed the reply and you're on it hasn't worked for her for a number of reasons and that is usually there indeed he looked at the probate file more closely the probate file demonstrates that there can be no attorney client relationship between my client and the minor the mother by alan a motion to dismiss by the law it has to be as is everyone knows a commitment of attorney client because of their of their pharmacist zealous advocacy and things of that nature those principles of law so it can't be was appointed the guardian why it is sure with defending the interest of the minor we believe the appointment of the guardian of my own best that individual with exclusive authority to proceed on behalf of the minor in the pending lawsuit
displaying be progressive in corrective in for just cause i even reference this terminations specifically and states that terminations will be preserved were strewn cases judgement regarding the collective bargaining agreement was taken out of the a school and so that the legislative preference verification could be as clear clearly established which every public sector me type municipality you were dealing with village to now seek out that a way to circumvent the agreement and entered into through it because what it seeking is the lesser standard which is merely ca rather than the standards that it entered into with the union which is the same instance we have here so my argument would be if they were going to file a grievance regarding the proceed one from the fire police commission it should have been far before then what would they have been grieving moving forward which is also referenced in the rockford piece i believe that he would have had that opportunity rather than do that he went forward with the hearing and purchase the decision was made a secondary argument if i may is the fact that you know the securitas route we've taken here today in the us and sometimes as if this would have been appeal but under  to say well you you've got to have not gone hollywood now i think what stops you from doing that is basically reviewing the rockford keys we've cited which is almost on all points here there's also discussion if you look at the rockford decision i believe there are some third make this argument between cause and just cause in trying to meet that some sort of a distinction here i think that's what prevents you from having remained a bad as they hadn't by the apple they had an opportunity to appeal those matters and they did and i think by basically seeing what the i mean you could look at it from a jaundiced eye here i guess as well if you could look at it from the standpoint say maybe they were looking at see what the police and fire commission did and then decided well now we're going to do made clear that before the hearing ever took place that they didn't and that is not the place for a grievance and that there is a contractual rights to it grievance for disciplinary matters would arguably violate the party's agreement if we were to play out arguments of a contractual nature like a grievance that would violate the contract which says that
is not the issue here the questions of fact are not an issue here today whether it was a mile and a half are under a mile and the issue here today is the fact that our  the statute reads and i'm going to paraphrase it yes or no five i'll see it five twenty nine three and let me just paraphrase it it's a pretty long statute but the near the end of the first good i mean that's not never sister and this case ok also let me say that i have twenty one to twenty seven pounds and willful want misconduct by way of in this case i believe so
turkey which concluded with security the baker hamilton commission it that image hamper us in the what's necessary to create the kind of movie that we need to create in order for america to be safe and i think that has had a lot to do with this attitude of defeat have a significant impact on the conflict in iraq which i think right now is being driven largely by internal dynamics so i'm not opposed to talking with them i'm very skeptical of the outcome of such negotiations based on what i
yes he did he's trying to make time with me what is that about  maybe i can borrow some don't you do it child keep you was broke as he is opportunity my dear is concerned with the future not the past look if it's come back when you are worrying about i happen to own oil leases in texas that are worth  know texas daddy the oil leases are a family joke plenty of leases but not one drop of oil dance but i guess that  e was expecting a young man more attractive she's the fourth in two weeks daddy i get really dopey since it was raining and i got wet so i got the flu and it's the beauty she got for my daughter genius inherited from a you better get busy with your contribution my wife the last nine months i've given you now i'm going to have time what do you this christmas night it is five years since the end of world war two veterans everywhere pray that peace will come with the new year was my serial fifteen thousand bu i know the second is if you didn't know me i'm your wife sickness and in health and dry clothes or you know how you are with coal you better go home and change we can't go home they keep it to dangle she better off in a you realize what time it is i was interviewing a woman she was a rich beautiful exciting she was interested in  no excuses necessary good luck to your child all but trying to help in the morning my dear that worked out fine because i should be getting it by then that night i don't worry about him at the wilsons he's invited everywhere the thing about that's how he makes his living i mean he gets paid her being a guest he still has the silverware  my daughter and charles wills my son in law a let me know how he makes it because it's sunday already what happened on friday and saturday church on friday what happens at church on friday maybe i'm going it's too late to grow up or you the rest is no way to get out of here i like it i liked it fine darling do you ever think of  i should think you had enough of  that i wrote you take one drink every afternoon but no more and i take that drink deliberately just so the idea of taking a drink won't get too big we had to say sometimes i forget and don't take the break but well i wonder the dingo see how it looked i want to a few other places to places where helen love mary and i just can't keep on talking i'm all tied up in knot guilty of that too and being guilty of course he must be punished what would hurt most take away what he loves most let him go
jobs and he they were there wasn't going to be enough then he goes to somebody else and says oh i know somebody who could help you he goes to that person but he needs more than just mr wait i think his name was so he brings to  that there was a duty in that circumstance to do a background check on these individuals and i don't think that this is even in cases like sure where you have to the contractor who comes in and job i can't see any particular fitness of this person for the three day job i can't foresee any harm that this person can do during jack but i can reason before she that after this job is over whether it's one circumstances if we create an opinion if we go to the outline we have to do something that will help the litigants happier employers out there how could we crack such a way under these circumstances  no rule but marshall nothing about background checks or anything like that all he knew was that his partner knew he had brothers who were police officers in chicago and once in a while one percent of the time that  they actually hired somebody martians coming they would say take a look at this guy they never got an answer of her own background or anything like that the only answer they got was you can hire this guy we're going to hear this guy which is a they're to the day laborers would you know you're kind of asking about just don't see how i just don't see how the law can be that you have to do that and then you wouldn't work anyway you'd
mr reid also provided information suggesting he wanted to make  what they should have been doing but it wasn't altogether good they had it right but then agent what came in and confused everything into word was correct betty jo was still the beneficiary and he kept is that a fair which they did so right out but by the time they sorted out they had two different claimants up way to take them to court now you can say if they hadn't had the two conflicting claims they  the investigation and failed to grow the conclusion it should have from its own investigation and extra contractual obligations on guard and read in order to do what the contract should have been under the terms contract anyway there's a response but it's quite possible that that island feeling out for god wanted to want to make it look like a name change because she thought were wrong but that would guarantee court they are says that it would be a put the in a situation such as a tour action where there are multiple claimants and there's a limited pool and insurance proceeds and insurance company could not somehow well they had them in their possession and as a result of that the court held that there could be a stamp liability on the part of that into the damage that change form was requested and that form was never returned and we also know from other discovery in the case that mr swain eat minutes in a text message to his wrist when they were trying to work out whether they could reach some sort of compromise they may text back and forth and mr we need it minutes in the text messages that she knew that she was not the beneficiary and that they had been trying to change it so even if you believe that there was something wrong with what was requested or not requested back in to in two thousand
position where there are students around and trying to avoid the student on the stairs or person on the stairs as the general public has to do and failed to do still is not connected to  that they would always be running up the stairs or going up the stairs at two fifteen when they're on the first floor so i'm curious about you know that how this might translate into another work setting let's say that you have a police department where you have an officer going downstairs and you have another police officer escorting a jail inmate up stairs in the jail and make pushes the  the officer down the stairs that you would put this into a neutral risk analysis that the four officer that was put down the stairs was traversing the spheres and therefore even over your wrist and the general public how can that be situation i would say that given the fact that they are police officers and that you know the altercation the possibility of an altercation between someone who's been arrested and a police officer exists that's a different situation did associated with a speech therapist so we would have to examine any of the subjective terms of the inmate the in pushing the police officer to determine whether or not it's a neutral risk no because that was a specific incident so what will the increase risk is i think one of the four is saying the fact that these students are around so that being around it is the increase risk if i'm asians she also in the morning and through to the girl she was required to stand outside and watch the children as they went into and out of the building and she testified she was preparing to go down the stairs for afternoon duty i mean predictable place every day and whatever number of children she had that she worked with she testified that it was her responsibility to go down the stairway as in this was this was in  superficial pilate anybody walking around downtown or the general public could be bumped into by somebody ok but they're not dealing with a bunch of rambunctious children running around all day long that every day not on the breadline correct these are is that are shared by the general public you know whether it's a group of students whether it's disabled people whether it's you know people work harder here and whether it's people who are blind there are all kinds of people that we encounter
case one of the victims and it was about it were cops this was backed up then i believe testimony by virtue of the phone calls he said he made sure gave civic timescape civic places what is important is this and this leads me into really when i leave the crux of this map and what makes this a good case for this court to decide is this is not as reasonable doubt this case is not that kind of case i think that the court can reasonably that there was reasonable doubt underlying we're all are all trying to figure out and said well we're going to reverse the conviction or reverse back not do that sentencing here is the basic fact that he had a problem he answers i in this property and so be the do well in place of an up who makes it even more interesting would be this case i think very dreamy is the fact that then justice but they did accept that joke and asked the appropriate way to deal with his staff with second main paragraph last sentence he asked the question to himself i get asked did he have a criminal intent other than violation of in our action when he entered or did he develop a criminal intent after  ok what your position is there so there's two main issues one is the apology to enter in the second is the intent then to connector you're focusing on on the lack of was this used to be his good friend now he's now he's with my girl although he denied that they were romantic is with my you with my girl so he went in there and now re which the defendant has discussed in this court deals with an entirely different situation factual situation and legal situation factually the defendant and read obviously if this were juries have been tried to a jury and jury would back and liberation we would not at all what was actually discuss we think this is a bloody and ugly thing we're just going to find gold we don't care going to get we're going to skip it we're going to skip the whole issue already we don't we can't mean we can't make up our mind what it's going to do then obviously the co is going to be extra special brief on this thing the read case is not that interesting which i think the the supreme court had every opportunity to decide this case on
i mean when you had you didn't have state farm should've ignored its contractual obligations to his insurer ignored the insurance regulations which really higher payment within thirty days disputed there there are basically of it is true this is not in the chapter seventy seven seven seventy of the code but again there is no requirement
yeah yeah ah
forty two belgrave square lucas is expecting a good evening i was a journey i enjoyed it i needed a rest i hope you don't think it are calling in on you like this i'm used to australians they do that sort of thing standing on form that's what i came to see or back to australia i want to go there myself i'm a bit tired of this country  know i don't want it up there downstairs i'm sorry if i appear to be poking my nose into your private things or apologize made by david walker it's almost identical i can get to that dr rankin you'll be my system now for several weeks you should learn by now that i won't be put off with substitutes i've always used policy or used it quite recently must be obtainable first i took some washings from the coach of people who just started with a common co filter the washing days i'm infected them with common culture and so far they've all been real the next stage the human body to test the vaccine on volunteers first to infect them with code from the infect it go on what are you going to say to me trying to think  do you mind if i ask a leading question when do i have to answer it now go ahead and exactly what are you private secretary private assistant private girlfriend or has recently been found for that this is a variety of things which were attacked to the heart the cardiac plague the most deadly of all german scientists were experimenting and planning to mass produc tiny droplets to catch it but i can't believe that anyone could be  look at this this is an aerosol bomb if the end of this were broken off in a crowded place eighty percent of the people within one hundred yards would be infected and most would die it wouldn't see the germs smell them or taste them but about three is to looking after a man that's the only job for a lovely woman a small hot water you i never allow anything that happens in private to affect my professional work my relationship with you here will not be influenced by what happened last night i expect the same from you i'm i asked mike about a drug called policy forester claims he used it all during the war i find it only made in germany in that case where did he get it i was in germany him self immunized the road the time has come when we must make the same test on the human body yet i know if successful it means that our country after immunization of the people will be safe to if i could lend my own body for this last this i would tracy i try to wonder stan too and heaven knows i have a piece of joe but it just doesn't make sense are you all right good then why can't i see you did but alright it makes no difference now please yes the police said not for some time
and and it's amazing after all these years but you spent a good part of the first day school visiting every school in almost every classroom and it's fascinating to watch that by nine o'clock or nine thirty in the bir bit actually goes to the middle school or you behave school level is there anything you do with them do that continue that day or are there any kind of counseling for students regarding the drugs and alcohol or substance abuse as they go through those metal grades where they're from an operating budget steer clear from a capital standpoint including really very quick things like that and over the course of the years we've had many building projects as we've progressed along we've to be available when the project actually started opening in the spring continues to grow over time and we began our whole undertaking what to do with that fire department the facilities like putting together the person is suitable for one under the rag if somebody has already gone through this process in other districts rather than having them go through the process again and have that report directly to us we can contact the other school and say could you send us your suitability to try this it is not a report so under the law school districts are not allowed to share the actual report the law we were required to retroactively go back to anyone who was hired after the one hundred thirteen so i didn't lose the last year we've done that we are required to do this for anyone you know who's hired during anyone who works here no matter when they were hired thirty years ago everyone will have to go through this process of apollo twenty six again the state doesn't have the capacity at the moment to do that and so they're having
then you can do something i submit to you but that is not and with the jurisdiction system works the court always has power to force its worst and you know in the proper resolution of this by jurisdiction to consider the underlying motion for sanctions and our position is that a circuit court did not have jurisdiction to consider that motion and i think the chronology of the violence in this case are critical on the issue of jurisdiction so this case began as a rule to twenty or titian it was filed in january of two thousand and four the rule to twenty  subject matter jurisdiction in the plaintiff refers to the essence of the court in the essence of the court being the ability to enforce its orders and there's truth to that but there's also the truth of the matter that but the section the part another distinction between them expectations leaders are asking for sanctions it really goes to the merits of the case because the section they're asking you to impose is under the guise of disclosed the unusual way about mr ages deposition is that players joseph proceed by way of a deposition meaning they were going to pos questions to mr page that were represented to gather the information they felt they needed to proceed with their product liability in the course of mr page is that position as the question