requesting that you reverse the commissioner's decision in this case and find that mr ferris equals medical listing twelve point zero four based on the opinion of its treating psychiatry dr bruce which is supported by evaluations qualified to offer an opinion regarding whether mr harris's physical and psychological term is in combination equal to lifting i think there's a difference between expertise and qualifications and making that her pain complaints there is evidence in the record that supports mr farris complaints that he has back pain so there's no question that he does have limitations due to that intent and acting and that dr bruce is opinion is supported in the record was markedly limited and that he was unable to work and there is not even any mention of those opinions in the administrative law judges decisions and she provided no reasons for rejecting those two opinions administrative law judge provided some reasons for rejecting her opinion those reasons as we argue are not just we're not specific and legitimate if you can't resolve the case at step three based on the determination of d his back his personality disorder and his depression dr official who examined mr farris clearly stated in his opinion that mr farris could only perform six hour two thousand it showed that kind of condition was improving the drug effects or was controlling his depression jupiter said that he was doing fairly well it's just kind of a contrast when you look at her actual progress notes versus her subsequent disability and the progress in those don't really tend to support that disability and that's the first thing in addition he noted the contrary medical opinions including ones and doctor bloomgarden that i just talked about and the evidence that i noticed daily activities were more varied than someone who claims he was clearly homebound and unable to form any planets needed to start taking responsibility for his attitudes and actions that's page three fifty nine and finds himself during his testimony page fifty seven so this far as his future plans one after his plan to become a travel agent failed he gave up and didn't care so there are different ways to interpret the medical evidence or the evidence overall certainly a rational way to do it is to see that this was a young man whose motivation was somewhat lacking that some of the government and in fact the seventy two light work actually found a good century job with minimal contact with coworkers or supervisors and that's pretty severe limitation for someone that age and given the those various comments from various sources it was at least a rational interpretation of the least with respect to the data entry operator the answer is yes again there's conflicting evidence there at some points he said early on the work at that job a month or two but he told other doctors that he was there several months i don't think there's really any simply to relocate from utah to washington because he liked his job opportunities better over there and in addition that data entry job was he's an officer with the i r s right before tax season and he was aware of that so that's another reason why he left so i think there is enough evidence in the record to indicate that he was able to do that  also noted the comments from de lay witness that i just mentioned that he played hours video games and actually went camping with are those are sufficient reasons to find climate not entirely credible again this is a case really of mixed  which is in the findings portion of her decision she determined that mr farris needed to sit or stand at will which means that suit pain he might have to change his position during throughout the workday and that's consistent with his testimony  in addition to people being supported by substantial evidence the administrative law judges decision has to be free of legal error and that's really the issue in looking at the determinations from dr nine's and dr brown feels he has to terminations is not supported by legal