confused in the factual situation if it took them more than a couple years beyond the fifty fifty month mission where the the oldest getting any so if the money was not paid as it was due then you get into the waiver provisions where your clients can voluntarily waive the monthly provision and agree to continue the contract correct unison that what typically happens in a contract case where you have to your client had to two options at the property  hypothetically that we agree with you and use we only disjunctive so i don't know what my colleagues thing but my point is even if that is true when you're correct because of the rent to own contract i think there's a difference between a lease and a rental contract because it was pertaining to rent to own contract ownership was an issue so it would be the same issues we have to bring as defendants we have to protect our equity interest we have i don't know that there was even an answer filed i believe that it was just we showed up in court and have a bench trial but that issue of payments made think you're right i mean you know i don't think they're even the most but the issues of payments made isn't true that the court in its state and its order at the end was it was almost like an afterthought oh and by the way we're going to issue since you returned the four is where in any of the leading was that issue ever even raised with this court jurisdiction to do that i believe it was raised by the an excess of five years and the amount and pay under the terms of the contract is less than eighty percent of all we did was less than eighty percent clearly but it was a more it was less than five years that it was originally to be not the d should issue and that since the action was brought in forcible entry detainer the trial what could only decide what was put before the court in a complaint about what the upon the loves is the subject matter of the complaint itself it's only part of the court's rationale the rationale of the trial court was that the bench trial was conducted evidence was presented and the defendant prove that they had paid in full and i don't believe that's an issue that at this level at the appellate court that means  the defendant pay the fifteen thousand and then tiredly and despite it was simply wrong about their mathematical calculation about in the complaint stating that twelve thousand four hundred  only notice that was given was three years later right before they found the complaint though my point is on the terms of the contract the contract could have there are all kinds of contract defenses that could have been claimed if you raised the issue of the was just to kick you out based on nonpayment so you're saying it was a contract for deed then just saying there was disagreement what then agreement is  record where it's really discussed the legal the back of the document being ownership vs a rent to own versus a contract or the i mean it seemed to me  to requested parent child relationship and the child support were made ended up in the trial court for wanting custody to the defendant despite there not the sellers the pointis were developers and builders and the purchasers were unhappy with the with the residences and wanted to bring an action after court this is important because the owner the purchaser is the equitable owner of the property fair game equity and the property and they also lost face with the loss of possession and loss of th