in light of the discussion and the prior cases i'd like to start with my goodness because i think it's it's a very easy issue given the description that was was just had judgments is correct this court does not take evidence of course and there is no evidence that this order is that its appeal is now because there was a sale in this case but the fact that there was a sale does not automatically  other words what do you mean without record in other words when the receiver brought this to the district court the receiver said i think in my business judgment this is a good deal this report says the receiver thinks it's in his business judgment it's a good deal i agree there have the evidence that we do have comes from the sale that came three months before same type of assets so for more than twice as much as what he and what helped him paid in this s so that this entire process has been about mr mr ganji crying foul and yet we still don't know why is this sell fair why is that property wise why is five hundred thousand dollars t right price what is the property worth what other what are those numbers worth why is it why is it worth that amount why is this a fair deal why who was approached to potentially buy this property who rejected it what were the reasons they gave to transfer that the receiver enter into an exclusive agreement with with respect to the marketing and sale resources rights held or determined to make part of the receivership the state that's in the a discretion by the district court in a private sale and i think the evidence before this court of the record shows that the receiver sought the judge's determination as to whether the sale was fair and reasonable under the circumstances  that help had been working for years to sell the i p s they had been successful in two occasions the receivership been going on for quite some time and the judge was interested in trying to wind it down and that was one of the reasons that the receiver decided maybe i should see if anybody's interested in this it was conversations with philco and oh by the way by real estate we do all these are the things we preach that everything so many allocate certain of the purchase price for certain of the assets and the reasons for doing that for example the two hundred seventy five thousand dollars that was reserved for her since he allocated from the ip address we had to do that because we had a settlement agreement with mr proof bruce which is the record which required us to pay him thirteen percent of whatever the spro sales price was for that particular block and it was a result of  that we were able to settle have it dismissed here something to the occasion of mr bruce to allocate a price that would seek objection from him and it is true we had sold the a block for a much more several months before that think six months before that which mr bruce also participated in because he was the recipient of the settlement with those two particular blocks so we had to allocate something for that and the receiver to turn in his business judgment two hundred seventy five there's no evidence before the court and there was no evidence that the pricing of the applications that were made by the receiver were anything other than his reasonable business judgment which he had seen throughout the course of the receivership that he had applied in numerous that the receiver sale was adequate because the circumstances thank you thank you for your honor respectfully there is no evidence of most of what mr liddy said in the record one final discussion of the negotiation won't find discussion of who made the offer you will find anywhere in the record there are no underlying facts in the