defendant but about the actions of a prosecutor prosecutors are representatives of both people to state it including criminal defendants as agents of the state prosecutors are sworn to uphold the law in the playfair and in this case the and painted herself as the lawyer for the deceiving trial she just period finance expert witness am she appealed to the emotions of jurors focusing him to return a verdict based on past and not on the law trooper dishonesty you know that we can fight prosecutors in this country and the prosecutors represent not just victims but the stock we know that prosecutors may not place the authority in their office behind the you're a jetting to do a lot of different things i can't remember the case but it was to the effect that if you've watched several specific objections you praise other handler objections you can't look at these things as well this thing happened when there was an objection to this thing happening there wasn't this thing was sustained and this thing was overruled even the state i think would concede maybe not that you have to look at these things in the context of the entire on that there was a good deal of your brief they're relying on i think three unpublished cases which is in violation of the supreme court rules i don't think goods in dead you can't look at whether there's a pattern and practice of misconduct on the part of the prosecutor if you don't look at the previous behavior of a prosecutor and i don't do that without si about the presumption of innocence so respectfully there's not a conflict because as you point out these are not public cases and they're not present but what has happened is that two things have been said that are polar opposites of each other about the very same cases initially that was granted later the defendant filed a motion to reconsider at that point in time this court took some motion with the case in the hou dilemma he's in there there does seem to be a similarity here and i will then play the issues are addressed absolutely killer prosecutor i agree so what does one do well attorney jennifer much and yes she did try to make a similar closing argument in town syndrom springer and pincus but here's the thing all three of these issue that it's riddle strader pincus and thompson all support the argument that if she's making the same argument and if this quote keeps saying defendant such that it is impossible to say whether or not a verdict of guilty resulted from those comments that's people versus neves or people versus wheeler that's focusing just on  year and so and i think that's the thing is when you have the emergency room doctor who looked at this child when you have the police officer who took his body into his arms when you nandor doing the autopsy of this child when you have dr kay studying this child's brain and then you have dr young come in and say well i got my information from the only person there was the it was improper but it did not rise to the level of reversible error riddle speaker said a prosecutor mistake or opinion and that witness is lying if the statement is based on the evidence and they cited people versus  cited in the state's brief here in thomson this court said that might just statement that it was ridiculous for the defense say he believed that he was in imminent danger language that says look something this a one off something that happens one time maybe somebody got angry and somebody made a mistake that may not rise to reversible error but prosecutors in danger otherwise problem convictions disinclined to go down that road look you you're good you didn't put it in the opening brief we're not going to consider whether this is playing here or the last thing i would say about it is this is much worse than any of those cases  the prosecutor putting in all the different parts that were in these previous cases and some extra stuff so i think that even if it were true that what happened in those cases either w not here or was not reversible error i think this is far worse and you know i think if i came up here in begin my rebuttal of the way then th