the idea of us coming up with a ballot of some sort you know and putting it to the voters to say hey look this is make sense no money spent nothing so you know just very often just a handshake agreement or something in writing or mind and how we deal with something like this is coming to a monetary creation to go to the voters with because you can go with the idea to the voters in the course and say well how are you and i am not prepared specially this evening to come up with you know what what we think is a good value for the property so that's where i feel like i can't speak correctly at this time about that but the concept being at least we didn't go to the voters maybe we get back go to the voters you might offer to have it appraised and then you could take that to the voters  maybe share the appraisal of him agree on a price and take it to the voters just put that in your room and give him a thousand dollars or give me a thousand dollars to hold it and if you don't know don't end up buying it if that's ok with mr cohen you could return the thousand dollars out a be able to take a tax deduction he's in his retirement years this sort isn't as valuable to him as if you have been working but he can still spread out over a few years and get something out of it so the tunker acquire it that district boundaries we've just come down to the property line and you can see that there are there are some mismatches along the property line the property lines instead that reduces some concerns that were raised in that also we think it's more consistent with the rest of her proposal the rest of the boundary changes that we are proposing are yes the concerns were raised mainly about septic and density potential for subdivision those were the main concerns now i have to say that the changes that the planning commission planning commission are imposing do not include changes to the protections of the natural features in this area so setbacks and buffers or streams will not be changed will buffers and setbacks for weapons the same restrictions that are applying now for flood way at flood plains will remain and septic is completely the jurisdiction of the state so even without this district the potential for development in this area is rather limited due to natural features student the natural septic issues that would occur we also heard concerns about the high water table and those are things that are going to be farther out in that five acre district water sources say they were concerned about contamination of the water source increased development and subdivision potential of their own i think those were the main concern too strict requirements for the soil and water conservation district with removing that does not remove the elevation restriction there are contours that show that quite a bit of that area would still be in that limitation where you cannot build above fifteen hundred feet elevation and problem neighbor and put it's actually quite steep up there so the developing potential again would be limited space down the natural topography river and then of course along the other side it's bringing those districts down to the line the property boundary which are you know on the other circle the route here so bringing the property  district line down to the property line with the range so that essentially again range would be the limit of the sort of water conservation district up to this split parcel here which is currently a would that would be the limit of change this what we completely be in the water conservation district anything beyond this parcel north and east would not change these parcels that are split would be in the water conservation district rather and they did not identify through their studies or reviews of studies any wildlife corridor that would be affected by the proposed change as you can see there are weapons in the vicinity there are flood plains in the vicinity removing these pockets would not affect those at all and most of these parcels if not all of them are already developed with houses so the concerns raised in this area were again for development particularly areas of the existing here one is the gold area which is basically a following park street and route team that would include most of the non conforming parcels which is a large why we're proposing this to go down to a quarter acre many in our analysis many of these lots were less than half an acre and non conforming as preexisting lots and then surrounding that in the purple area would be carving up again a little bit out of the one acre district and a little bit out of the rural residential district following the us sort of settlement pattern in the in this area what we're doing is looking at how it developed and proposing that the purple areas be a wanted her district were again taking some of the parcels that are either half and half or all in the rural residential or three acre district capturing as many of the non conforming  as we can recognizing that there are some that are larger than the large enough to be conforming parcels but just by nature of the parcel boundaries to make a more defined  district they are just incidental so again the purple is a proposed one acre district and the cold is a proposed quarter acre district i will note that on the other side of park street in jericho there is owning is also a quarter acre following property hot property lines for district boundaries and part of the reason for doing that is to be able to replicate it on the ground most people have an idea of where the property boundary is but you know just having some kind of general cut in you know on a map you can't really identify it on the ground this village center district the way it currently is drawn was based on the original margin strip service area which is no longer valid as a district area so it's for ease of identifying where you walk in and they're also only proposing to have i think it was for identifying properties that would  scheduling didn't didn't really happen the way we planned so i think they're taking a little bit more anger because the schedule is not pushed to the first meeting being where you can meet with the planning commission so there's still more work to be done on this i will tell you that the total federal funds cost is approximately one hundred thousand dollars more than what was identified in one thousand of the two thousand option they actually recommended and encouraged obtaining other grants to supplement that there are the other options that c c r p c recommended would be the buy head program for the state and also the sidewalk program through so part of the day will also include anything scheduled which is not included here so i'm waiting on those figures but this was their estimate for total project now total cost for local fun and did it completely ourselves i like a looser material i think they're concerned with that material is that i don't believe you can use federal funds for something like that but they did mention that you could put like a small strip along it along tunnel reportedly ready i'm supposed to get that i was actually supposed to have already had unfortunately but they were supposed to get it to me before the january second planning commission me the difference between those two federal funds i don't have an explanation this is all i have right now but there are some additional federal requirements that could increase the cost going to rather than if we were to do it ourselves three yeah there's also the other consideration of the other violations that are taking place due to the prior piece that he signed in two thousand well the attorney i copied everybody no e mail from me from the attorney you know that was an option so and then mike my question is do we want to proceed that way i don't see avoiding everything we're doing just not listening has to go to the next step that would be my take on it but i think we need to revisit it one more time with brad here so we all win together i think i mean i know this is we're is it best when you say new building is it is your feet here because you know going up the back of the building there's more of a way in there than actually toward the front of the building right well but you have to be the same requirements or you have to be at least thirty feet off n y and then you've got a little bit of flexibility because you have to be twenty feet from the rest of the property lines but it's going to be the natural limitations that are on that property so that's why you see it's already in the cleared area it's probably not to be an property permanently or are they going to be gone in a certain time for  doing you know all of the basically i and of the anywhere that the trucks can go i need to know how big that area  temporary structures or uses are ones that are going to be discontinued and removed after a year max and then there's there's an allowance for one a one time extension for a temporary structure of up to a town there's nothing that says within the scope of this job so in we only within the scope of this job there's nothing in there that says helps move office furniture or takes down a janitor ganz just general maintenance or reason but is have open communication between the employer and the selected one of where if somebody where he said you know i want to do you i want you to construct a bridge that he turns and says this you know i i really don't know that i can i might be able to do this this and that you just have i mean that's just common sense  years and then you can turn around and say well gee i can't do that so i have to get this person to help me and i have to get the person to help me i have to go to my boss and talk about you know how do you do that is completely different than what it is but anyhow  communicating cooperate with the select board as appropriate in all the areas and specifically and work with the select board to provide i mean the savings and work with the select board and you to work with the  probably should be read and understand that's fine you know and or know when to ask for assistance in performing tasks it's kind of like begin at the heart when you should already you should already know to ask your  said well before celebrity asked me to find out this information and i got that same response and to me if a vendor want to talk to your finance officer or your treasurer that's not good you know that's just not good because you because it really everything that's over a certain amount has to be approved by the full select board so it has to be it has to be some piece of paper they get that has three signatures i think just you know you may be able to go back to another way later but i think with that before that when somebody took a truck over there from like a thousand dollars in repairs that the selector was very shocked upset about it remember this in the last year or so so i mean i think there has to be even if it is a truck that not i also don't want to fix something so that you know tomorrow that truck broke down and i'm not around but you know i think you know i think i think they just have to know that you just can't go back either you know whoever like you think becomes own form and they're at least one date or one member of the three member select part has to sign something even if it's an e mail to approve that thing so that and then they have to attach that to be in place so  over the years they've just pretty of all done whatever my feeling that leases are just pretty well had free reign you do not have a car and they didn't have to check maybe i mean maybe that's all good and well and good but that's the habit that it's somebody who knows machines because if they you know i disagree with me if they call me make a very good question i would probably disappear forever stan thing because i say oh god i don't want to hold up the guys and i don't know if it really needs it but might have been part of what they would charge us plus you know i mean i don't know here there's a local company who for a long time i think just you know pretty well our representation like you know we don't have any fraud here you know we're doing everything according to the law and all sorts of five pages of things and it's pretty standard and they're all kind of around the same principles generally accepted in the united states and what that's referring to is there there is a new gadsby forty five which came out in two thousand and eight which says we have to put the liability on our balance sheet  and unfunded post employment retirement benefits so in our case we do have retirement health benefits for employees so we're supposed to do is you know hire an actuary and they will determine how much that will cost over the life of those people who are in the life of current employees even and looked at as a liability and you know then you have to have that actually work study done every three years and you know we didn't do it this year you know we've this is our first gas these days and we have all the gas we compliance except that one and primarily by the time we got around to realizing that you really needed to get that in there it was  and then health insurance so right now we have john and we do have the retiree health insurance program but it might not it might be on boy with the new health care law i'm not sure because it what it really tells us is that we will offer a medicare carve out insurance to the employees and the policies may not even have a medicare card anymore so and then the other thing that's our policy that's led by made that policy if it is something that's a if we if the only person we have on retiree benefits next year is joan i would say not to have an actuary and get just have a sentence that says it's in compliance except for putting that number in there and that would be a reduction of about twenty thousand dollars from what we ended this last fiscal year and that's primarily because the highways and you use about fifty thousand more cash you know quite similar they're not going to have enough surface so that when i started we had like almost a seven hundred thousand dollars surplus so in two years we're down to five hundred thousand and you know we shouldn't current status of things and decide what we want to recommend for possibly applying for the grounds for and you know come up with a list of possible items and then present it to you guys to decide which is if you  break the tie in the yeah i don't know if you had a chance to look over the budget if there's anything you want to change modify i was thinking of maybe putting some money in for an actuary have two hundred and eighty thousand dollars in reserves that offset a twenty six percent yes yes yes that brings that down but again as i said i didn't put in what you wanted to put more into reserves but i can't even do that the capital went up so much it doesn't even have a percent but the capital went from a budget of three forty three t if it if it make qualify for grant do we want to go ahead and just purchase it now do we need it now or is it something that you prefer i want to put on their list of things to apply for  don't know how that works out in the money range i just thought i'd mention that there's a possibility but i don't know if that's something you want to go ahead and purchase now it's a curve it's in need our if it's something that you want to check into this or not if you don't buy it then you can go get the great what you got to get you have to get your letter of approval on the grant before you go and actually purchase i'm you can possibly move that letter of approval if you are  you fix the stairs and all that stuff you have to make sure all those things are taken care of itself but you know in my mind i mean you can definitely try and see if you can get that but in my mind you know safety is really safety not moving things  know hopefully maybe we can get the money in before we send the money