attorney at that hearing part of the transcript he was kind of set up for that that is to say you're going to be one of these people if your parents came after partition or from india and were your parent did your parents come from india and he to why he changed his story one response you get well it doesn't matter that he changed the story on that because he could still be a member of this group even though his mother was mourning and it was clearly so he was even though his mother was shouldn't have been formed but rather every two months as an interval rather than under ration there's also testimony that he was supposed to do it for a much longer period of about eighteen months that's on line six of that same page as i read that testimony he's saying but i reported regularly every month to the police station between january ninety six and ninety eight mister i don't disagree with the court he did testify that  and his failures in that regard are in line with the state department's finding in the record at three fifteen that they have seen an increase in non mobile share pakistanis falsely asserting mohajer origins and this is  what the immigration judge concluded that this person was not truthful as to whether or not he was of the group he claim to be and it is central to the claim that he testified indeed his mother and father were both born in india and it is not a small matter because the immigration judge made clear from the very beginning of this case that it was important for matter of fact that his father was born there and he could have also been within that group the problem with this testimony is he testified exactly this way all i know is my parents they were born in india but they moved to pakistan and then later the only evidence that he submitted were the the records adama style and i would note that opposing counsel mention that the immigration judge didn't put much weight into these documents while there was no there  judge could only credit the documents so far as to where the parents were from what he knew was where the mother was not from because it said she was born in the country of pakistan he did not say where his father was from and therefore it could not be conclusive for his claim not the standing his his lack of harass me on that point indeed the other in consistencies that went to the heart of the claim include the fact that immigration judge said in explaining the problems in this area and petitioners counsel has alluded the fact that he said he was nervous and the judge said reasonably it does not seem to the court that one would remember an almost three year period as if it were only two months no matter how frightened one was and we submit that that is a reasonable assessment of of his testimony there are other right after telling them that this is that this is a problem that the judge then else are proving their parents came from is a very very important element your case why haven't you made an effort to get their birth certificates administrative record there are a lot of missing pages back when you triggered my saying that is the page that would have told me how all those letters came to be in the record and so on was not there all of a sudden i'm jumping and i'm hearing about these conclusion is that that's exactly right and i would submit that they haven't any other evidence is far from compelling the conclusion because he couldn't prove the critical and core facts and i don't think that the record at all and the immigration judg opinion is that all the self less to whether he could prove he was a moment here which was the fundamental fact of this case thank you very much thank