i understand where the issue comes up and they keep asking claim construction questions and why don't you just continue to object continue you don't need to answer that question and remain available at point i substituted order who had who ability to answer these questions so that i would not ask a record created by a lay witness who did not understand the legal niceties  expected right and then i substituted a afterward we went back to ask all the questions again i objected we'll see a future hall but at least i protected my brand so that we have a record we was your witness being honest about really legal questions or questions which which sort of verges on on infringement i want to tell me whether the opening as infringement questions they're referring to the device in question the accused device and i could earn an extra claim construction or simply of course the fee that's the problem and that that there's always an objecting was that you were afraid that the district court would rule against you right and say that the question to a proper but if that happened then that said by definition would show that you were wrong in objecting and i for sure you're wrong in walking out right so assuming you are right assuming that you felt that your position was right and it was reasonable and it was one that that ultimately the district court would agree with and you had no prejudice and that situation it's a strike me there's an element of self help here now though if you want to protect against the risk that the district court would say that these questions are proper but that's the very risk it seems to me that inherent in continuing deposition when the district proper i want to present witnesses with legal capabilities answer that and she agreed with that now i take it there was no there was no effort at the time of the deposition to reach that court and get it  depositions other than to the extent necessary directing with chambers and l have to make these two experts available on either july twenty fifth or twenty six that's not an order that's not  their i mean he has an argument he thinks he was doing the right thing a you can call him dogood in his determination with hard to find bad faith is if you are the man think you can certainly find with the district court was that mr chambers walked out of that deposition not because the questions were improper but because his witness was giving the wrong answers and it goes back to this opening just loop until we have a witness stand up and show there was all over the place now so in other words in order for us to read bad faith we have to also accept your argument that their witness was giving the wrong answers and that's why they pulled him down no your honor you have to  deciding what's fact and law and some circumstances and they think this is a problem these are the questions that district court judges deal with all the time and and they didn't really take them but that's what th deposition goes on to conduct that has to be substantially justified is not the objection that he was mending it's not the final legal point of whether this one over to claim construction or whether it was one reason that the conduct he has to show