MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
of been filed the witness list had been filed and it was initially the pretrial conference was set for june the thirteenth at which time the court dismissed the for lack of prosecution for not having filed i was not the initial so we get to the operative dates june thirteenth over five which was a pretrial conference we did not have the joint pretrial order but all the other documents have been had been filed  what would be in your view the bases what leverage we say to that to the district court on this record well you know if you say to the district court that it didn't really look at the five criteria and thompson that there was not really a question of case management in that there was still sufficient time to have the another pretrial conference with the following the pretrial order that there was no real opportunity there was no other sanction that would be less harsh it could have been a monetary sanction i don't think that issue sanctions would have the appropriate because we had the record shows i might stab bears when it's for the art i was let's follow through that maybe the court should have given different reasons but the court gave the reason and the record supports the reason the cou having one in each subsequent time that there was a reminder you only have to live to just ignore a court order once that's when you end up in trouble understanding that yeah  court although it actually cited the five reasons it only considered the fact that there had been multiple continuances in that matter and based on that information the just report could infer dilatory conduct occurred and therefore lack across tuition was appropriate if you want to pinpoint the question you asked though he didn't go through the steps he didn't tell us one two three four here's what we're doing and here's why and that's the question whole however i do see that there is you know a narrow record here and as i mentioned when i first came up here if it would its athletes position obviously that th record before the court does not show abuse of discretion however if it would please this court to or if it is the feeling of this court to obtain a statement of reasons then i can understand that conclusion that defendants are also dilatory and that is not the case and they raise that in the reply as well look all rule sixteen point seven squarely places the responsibility for preparing the pretrial order on the plaintiff it is a manner in this case and on the other hand you didn't have a series of e mails going out saying listen we have to get those mortar up for drugs let's get it done preparing you know joint exhibit lists and other documents and you know based on that i think it's fair to conclude that defense defendants would have cooperated with the pretrial order as well y other times and this would be a windfall to the defenders there's absolutely no prejudice to it serves the public interest that this type of a case so you can make that argument if you want that's why i ask you if you had any revival you could make that i could be w
you right now you pick the one person that is the political science major advance a question you know your client correct you're correct so you're going to explain to me right i will i will find a way decision is based on that as well as the your asserted construction of dietary supplement right as for so all those limitations are in this claim as decided by the district court below whether i would agree they should be or not that's not the issue and that is correct nevertheless i think that these particular guidance in this particular guide into this subject in this context that we have for this is particularly problematic for several reasons first of course we know  ma'am so your answer to treasuring this question i think i understand would be even if it was discovered that it alland i couldn't have its tumors in cancer patients it would not be eligible for that right unless there is something more to it yes or no no no one disagrees with any of that it's all natural process all the inventors here discovered was if i said to give you more a downy it turns out that your body will not suffer homo station says it doesn't many is a new way of using an existing drug modern human and animal diet in particular useful supplements increase the function of fishes when consumed what part of that language do you think admits that the patents in suit employ only conventional activity that's why i read it to you you know hopefully you are right i don't want to deny that but it's always nice there if i took a look at j m one zero six three how call in the balco reference which was attached to the hofmann declaration which express lee says the addition of glycine increases that other kinds of insulin increases the effectiveness of amino acids and each person says including our nine so what we have here is at least a fact argument presented in evidence before the judge at this pleading stage that says this combination does more than each thing individually would placing as well so why doesn't that k q outside of front brothers you can't possibly tell me do you that front rather stands for the proposition that even when two things are put together and found to have a greater impact than either one could have individual either still ineligible pharmaceutical compound and therefore all pharmaceuticals are now ineligible if that's your argument you know you're never children are because when you put two things together in a class something different than when they would each close individual e has to be eligible i would generally agree
court you know the government my name is jerry hug me i represent kevin bad when this appeal mr bad was convicted after a jury trial the northern district of iowa four counts that were charged in the indictment and we've got the first issue deals with the claim that mr bad should have been able to cross examine more thoroughly the confidential informant the case by the gentleman by the name of mr clarke regarding a two thousand well and i maybe i was too quick to agree with you i think it's a little bit unclear as to whether it was the be or the a part is fires weather was a felony i would have cases  court because that the issue had kind of morphed from the original intent of counsel in trying to get into some prior convictions by the time that they had the conference outside of the jury and it was brought to the court's attention
me by some kind of id copy of an id ok i got the decision back which in the back he should have brought someone from payroll queen central booking bear in mind this is why the case was pending at the appeals council ok i stayed in the central booking for one whole day the attorney that represent me at were there on a day when just coincidently there investigator sure that he did that were in the booth operating on that that was downstate parking lot that was not  despite mr pryor's claims to the contrary the facts in this case are relatively straightforward substantial evidence in the record demonstrates clearly that while receiving so security disability benefits in two thousand and eight he worked and earn fifteen thousand nine hundred twenty two dollars and fifty four cents a lot he says it's a different lot but my assumption is that somebody who works for the sole security administration office of the inspector general when they go on a stakeout or a surveillance went to a parking lot that was in fact although it is used for the hospital it is in fact run by parking systems that's what parking system to us it's up contracts with different facilities to run and to be awfully ironic that it happened to be there that day and in an affidavit to the district court he said it was a parking systems facility and that it just so happen to be there admit it that he got his picture taken  that he met the investigator and that he was just covering for somebody going to lodge i mean it could be the facts in this case are very clear there i think there are six major ones five of them i think were before the administration and then the last one that is the point mr pryor himself submitted to the federal court that he did admit that he was at that parking lot when the investigator was there did not proceed against him for those years is that accurate i believe i cannot speak specifically to that all i know that in the record he submitted there was a two thousand and eight administrative law judge decision on his continuing disability the issue there was not per se was he working and none of his two thousand and eight employment records were given to social security as a standard medical assess that was a continuing  review yes and there was no specific finding about wages in two thousand and eight made that is the sole issue here did he work in two thousand  interestingly enough mr pryor put in himself and assisted our case this that there's substantial evidence that he did work in two thousand and eight well no the sufficient
question is if we assume that that there is substantial evidence to support both conclusions both readings well doesn't that mean that based on our review we have to defer to the board's conclusion i think that's probably correct i think is there any difference between your use of i think essential it's the same material in van etten very much concentrated on the left most trio of twice really but at least once a very clearly issued the other really good idea to go and try something like this and i know you i know you have an interpretive question about some words that build in conditions but but that one at least seems pretty easy to read as this is worth looking at i wonder if your argument is somewhat stronger on what would be the reasonable expectation of success quite usual for scientists it was before looking at say some general for looking we should research this for but here of those statements are actually quite clearly in the context actually that paragraph refers to  control group either so what it teaches is that for fully to be substantial evidence here that van etten does in fact render obvious representative kinds or if i'm in tears because the board and the examiner is reading of it that here is reasonable and it's a reasonable conclusion and and it's one that the the of the data here isn't that more isn't that evidence more appropriate for an examination of whether it would be obvious based on a modification of benetton rather than the  was specifically suggest further study of fully alive on and that's what the entire purpose of the study was it then also indicates that the studies had already been done in in vitro and so this was means adding are using it to tional like a vitamin or likes like pregnant women take folic acid supplements when they're pregnant i mean it does not mean that it's necessarily given with an additional phase and i later improvement when there is sarah tone and added to whatever the background is in the patient's body how does that tell you that you would see an improvement without such supplemental  and so you can study you can compare what the basal dilation will be in a control group as well as in a diabetic group and in a diabetic group it shows that over time the is not improved is not increased but with the administration a full weight it is improved and it is increased and so the application of serious hanun was simply used as a known control parameter
some circumstances there might be an adverse employment action if upon submitting an application a it was made apparent to the applicant that because of his race this previous meeting with simply systematically marching through a section of the application and confirming cashiers answers i have to say that they they record reflected what seemed to me that's fairly harsh and covered field matters a direct directed applicants to disclose all contact with the police even if the matter was sealed and again kushner was applying to be a police officer so he could have had enough good judgment to understand that for this particular application he
different explanation using all the same facts but repackaged into a different explanation the problem is that this statute requires you first get a contract in officers decision on your  issues as well as out of scope requests or technical personnel such as alteration of the gunners cage handles addition of rubber mats  the air force by their actions waived any issues relating to delivery delays ultimately on five march twenty ten they haven't waived all rights in the livery delays formally accepting the contract officers problem and the contracting officer response all of it is true it focused on the waiver issue but nevertheless we need we broadly say that the contracting officer really consideration that simulation technology did that should justify that even though the government in their eyes of wave consideration they still did some consideration that consideration is extra work and extra time i mean the whole record it's all of the way and we're going to waive and they ended up taking possession of the vehicle and he had the whole the whole record is about you know you didn't tell me this and then and i didn't get in the cab and there's a delay so it seems to me that an argument can be made that that that we're dealing with the same operative facts it's my question to you is that if we find that we are dealing with the inclusion of the paragraph on a twenty two out of scope changes approximately fifteen thousand dollars of additional cost simulation technology now my post counts in this case that there's no other way you can read while the other way to read that is they had  saying that the operative facts in a waiver claim are a question of whether the parties came to a meeting of minds on this  on giving certain delays for whatever reasons they chose to agree to basically the performance  for whatever reason
the morning that they pay for the united states the premise of the defendant's argument is a premise that this court has rejected many many times which is that the burden is on the government to exclude every possible in this in every inference that could
that this was an this business this was suggestive but it was justified because it was necessary he didn't know we knew how long this woman was going to live it was necessary to get an  same time mr prime but the question i have really is what supreme court case we look to because it seems that there inconclusive on the circumstance that you're presenting  the dark skinned hispanic males the description was given to the police there was another hispanic male that was detained at the same time but they were not shown together they were shown individually but they were but they did see both of them and the witness was precisely the same time but the whole incident is contemporaneous well it is very close in time but once you've identified the event in this case it was unlikely he was going to identify a second person so i'm suggesting that once a person doesn't have to make a specific ruling that this is the rule but when we read all these cases together life's overall in simmons what we see is a preference for something more than a single person show and i think that is sufficient i think the supreme court that's probably why the are not supposed to rewrite the supreme court rules because if we were to write such a rule i think we've been headstrong and a whole lot of other constitutional problems with was always a problem when the supreme court says we review th you know even if there was a problem that the evidence is pretty strong and well then we would have to get into the second question in the west was this admission of unreliable without more does not violate due process and that's what happened here there was a show up it's understood that curbside lineups are suggested in one sense but also necessary important and fact in this case the police did
cool like jimmy stewart in mr smith goes to washington they just want to create a place for kids to get off the city streets in the summer we all want places where our kids and our families can swim in the summertime they are sa than a cool like jimmy stewart in mr smith goes to washington they just want to create a place for kids to get off the city streets in the summer we all want places where our kids and our families can swim in the summertime they are saying it's cool it's about resources for our neighborhoods it's about things for us and families to do in the summer over five hundred people can public hearings to determine cool from city manager micrograms pla audience to me totally clear that we oppose the idea that they should build five make a pulls and spray parks which was the stupid idea that had been on the table twenty months earlier before we'd all been speaking out the one that voted against  we were standing there in their face obviously saying that this is not just what we want but this is what everybody who spoke wants on november third the pool's took another law when the same representative representatives were kept in office for you know just by all kinds of disrespect and not getting listened to we are we are still here and we are never going to stop now and so we have democracy it w nineteen years however long it takes us and then the majority of our city council votes the other way and that is not a state of democracy their message is clear city hall is not a legitimate representative of the people been deceptive about the pool's issue and they do not represent voices of the inner city or the immigrants in the u i believe it was true where our city council and our city administration were blacks the many ethnicities and immigrant groups that we reflect and is not majority white men all the time was i believe in that i believe it i don't even know what store we go to hearings and we are never again disrespected as we were in september i believe
to give as much light as possible saving lives making work easier that's our job and speaking of safety reminds me of something else about our old friend the sixty watt house about safety is built right into  burns out and so stopped the art before it had a chance to break the mold it's just another example of the kind of thinking constantly used to make more and better lamps at lower cost whether they're for a minor wearing a mile underground well there's year's lives better living to lots of people because it makes their work this is especially important going through inadequate lighting must be replaced we want plenty of good light for the relied now the students will do better we're learning more and enjoy doing it when it comes to studying as if there is nothing like throwing a little light on the subject we brought more enjoyment  they'll be of the same uniform high quality why does it make so much is kept until it finally burns out in this way we know exactly how the lamps will perform we can be sure they will give light at its best with the lowest possible cost for the use to which they a another building how does the world famous lighting institute of miller park which has become a school for the lighting industry it has been a conference center since nineteen twenty three p t how the results of research in manufacturing getting a decoration here in the institute men and women from all over the world study how modern lighting can help to make their operations easier and more profitable on average thirty thousand of them come to the is almost no limit to the jobs light does for a tiny lamps are the indicators in the nervous system of our civilization and in our daily work giant lamps are the signals guiding our far in the hands of law in order could not exist without light energy of uniformity an organization medical aid in the purpose of making a product that contributes to his ear more productive and more pleasant li
that remind us to stay off the grass after a gas attack places them like what gas in the fumes that it gives off may be lurking on clean and covered by grass or rubber a four days or even weeks after it has dropped their minimize the harmful effects of water gas if the like with spiders on the your skin or clothing or if you have been exposed to gas vapor remove all outer clothing outside the house including two there's a void spreading the gas inside remember liquid gas spread by contact like poison ivy leave the contaminated boating outside to be decontaminated later few minutes after exposure in order to be able to use this quickly make the solution in advance by mixing a tablespoon full of baking soda in a quart of water keep this handy and tightly caught then properly lay the bottle now to actually irrigate your eyes fill an enema bag with a prepared baking soda solicits have someone to help you irrigate each guy with a steady stream for at least two minutes alternate back and forth from one eye to the other so that injury from the gas  then get into a scholar as quickly as possible this remove the bleeding solution after it has utilized the gas used plenty of soap and wash thoroughly or by doing so you are taking an added precaution in the event you may have missed some exposed area and they go to wash your hair if you haven't provided first aid but serials in advance don't waste time looking forward to the next best thing was immediately after removing your quote let water run into your eyes to help remove any traces of gas with maybe a minute in a case like this you must lie down immediately relax don't exert yourself even if you'll be long right don't take a ten lie down because it does it may aggravate your condition if you've gotten gas in the oarlock tell your warden to notify the emergency now let's go back to those close the all clear has sounded in the water has notified us that it's safe to come out don't touch the globe you might get liquid gas on yourself a brain man from the united states citizens that then score will take them away to the real purpose of the enemy and using war gas is to spread fear and panic it's to destroy him around and to cripple our war production the enemy hope that we will become scared and panicked that the weapons our soldiers are waiting for will  blankets to cover windows shattered by high explosive bombs go up above the first floor don't go down into the basement unless you have a gas brew filter that's stay indoors until your air warden tells you with take the lead if you come in contact with gas outdoors leave all the clothing outside the building time of your life if you are using the reply first aid as quickly as possible quickly remove any liquid gas by blotting be careful not to spread the like w
country what you're not you end up sleeping with her seeks spin two years