is a member who would reduce this resolution you have in the opening remarks here just wanted to say that you know this my pleasure to introduce this legislation on behalf of the newness is  do not know mr newness very well but i am an old and dear friend of his mother and her family and so they felt comfortable in coming to ask me and i looked into the consultants  and i felt comfortable in moving it forward so let's hope this is something we can do i think it would be very beneficial thank you before you do that i would like to disclose all possible current interest chuck nonis and i are second cousins and you know because of the close proximity of the family i would like to make sure that there is no chance of any conflict of interest issue being brought up at a later date so i want to disclose that to leave it to you in the members to decide if i should recuse myself or not whichever way you decide mr chair i have starting the reason why the resolution was requested is that the developers in a new ms families are trying to finalize the subdivision action that would allow them to do the final transfer of the land between the newness family and the whole new a car resort and that's still any reason that this resolution was being requested during this subdivision action and there was about between ten to twelve feet and places and because of that it reduced the area that was usable by the newness family the problem is that when you have the utility easement they're not allowed to put any kind of structures easement and it becomes almost to the in their eyes not usable lamb and they wanted to make sure that in a land exchange they had this equal amount of land in order to effect bills one is to change the community plan from park to business and the other one is to change the zoning from p k general park district to be to community business district here with a whole new a car resort located here and what it is is the newness property originally was where portions of the north beach park was developed and the reason why that was done in around two thousand and five two thousand and eight between that time is that when one or came in for this special management area permit one of the conditions was to construct a north beach park and at that time the mali planning commission wanted one contiguous north beach park this is shows the pics application before they did a two thousand eight community plan change and zoning out placation the pink color is where the newness property was originally with the green is where one originally owned the property through the land exchange after two thousand and eight after the community plan amendment and changes only was effected the new owners property portion of the property that was to be exchanged was community plan and zoned business while the remaining portion was for the contiguous north beach park was community planned and zoned b k park this is how the subdivision was eventually going to be effectuated and what happened is that this is the easement in two thousand and eight it was at that  time assumed that it was going to be a five foot wide easement but as they went through the whole subdivision process the utilities needed to have more space easement was changed between ten to twelve feet in portions and in order to do something about it what it is is that they needed to x create another six foot wide portion of the property four in order to give to the land they complete the land exchange with the newness family and all of this is required as part of the land exchange and eventually the owners of the whole new york i resort intend to transfer the property the north beach park cracked name of the trust and then we drafted it subsequent to that we did ask the applicant for trust documents to verify the trust name and i take it the documents however i'm not satisfied with what i received i'm not comfortable stating that that is the correct trust me so what i propose that we do is just a man that second we're asked to take where it says on the third line so basically i would like to revise the result to take out the trust names and just to refer to the newness is trust generally i don't believe that this change will affect the substance of the resolution  would be bothering them or not i wish they were here to confirm with them i mean i understand what you've said and it's on the record however if their attorney or someone else on their side say no no no shouldn't be done that way then i have that concern but i don't want to hold it up eith this time between now and first reading should that come up become a challenge of that become issue that needs to be corrected mr chow hope at that point we could correct it so i'll go along with all right now because the notices are not here to speak for themselves is as to what the trust name has been and the documents that we have submitted so far to the cooperation council is the documents according to mr nunez that he has but counsel has suggested you know maybe mr newness and contact his attorney who did the trust documents and get a more definitive answer as to what is the actual trust name and we are willing to work with mr newness to get that information to the c the counsel so i'm satisfied mr thank you and i think between our first reading hopefully that could be resolved in that way it's clean when it's brought forward because i think again this is been a long overdue it's initially was supposed to be five feet away now extended out to ten right and so the difference is the family obviously wants to get their fair share of equal swapping of the land so to speak so that additional say hello or something in that section so that adds the five to the front fire road and that right and we are worried guys that it had to be done this way because the original ordinance in two thousand and eight which adopted both the community plan amendment and the change in zoning was done by meets and survey so in order to make that changed of six week change they needed to do another meets and bounds description as well as do the change in zoning the community plan amendment in order for the subdivision to be completed ok and i mean the park is existing already and utilize the right of part of the existing park will now be  fence stuff or something to make it the private property of the new nose family they don't have any at this point the new owners family does not have any plans to develop the lot they're just interested in getting the the land exchange completed  the park has been in existence from around two thousand and eight and this is already two thousand and sixteen and they've been going through the subdivision process all this time and as the process because it takes so long to get the subdivision finally approved the utilities from five feet increase during that process and originally when the two thousand and eight community planned change in zoning was done it was assumed at that time in their to excuse muskoka ok thank you sorry you went off on that tangent but thank you for your comments and then this is just of rest so to be sent to the commissions the planning commissions i'm sure this is just a read what we're trying to move recommendation recommendation