arguments that helen just made here is this on here how these two different contracts and different aspects of the development were conducted on one contract and what this proposal was a completely separate contract that's not games proposal we know that in january ninety ninety one who will formally decides hey we're going to do fabricate a directional influence or to demonstrate to honeywell in may nine hundred ninety to eight to two nothing and then there's one three two two two three those three documents outline and illustrate what is going into d d s number eight number nine and number ten and it's the claimed invention and mccartney in one of these documents is sending this drawing and it says fabricating all three of these identically because we're going to demonstrate them to bomb then mccartney testifies that his deposition that a directional then we get the change proposal and get it to be first to these three devices but it also says that everything's included that had gone before and also the first two things like d d number nine which is says we're going to have to deliver all by august twentieth which would be similar to either do you number six or do you number nine do you number nine is identical to the reduction to practice we don't know or from exhibit six six nine one that boeing in fact tested do you number ten again do you number ten is identical to d q number nine so if you look at what happened before adding ames proposal they said we're going to build this directional diffuser here's what it looks like so your honor all the facts that the district court found that this was not a tough question he said that the overwhelming evidence shows that it was a two lens array that was offered in the games proposal now the triple wins but one thing is clear in on the body is that the two lands are ray was the one that worked at best i don't think it matters at work to pass it medicals off but in fact it did work the best it was the one that they built the only one it they built the  there's another argument that on his major route the one he will grieve is it could not have been an offer because well what was alternately the final design had not yet been determined but frankly it doesn't make sense because normally when you're trying to offer something for someone to incorporate into their design the design of course is not final because they haven't decided whether they're going to put into it but if the design is not i think that could be interpreted to clear everything come before and certainly what came before wasn't too lends a read which was reduced to practice and tested and demonstrated by someone who will improvements in general but it does refer to when you look at what they're you know where to specifics are provided it does refer throughout to do you number eight number nine and number ten so your honor if you look at what it is you know if you look at the entire timeline of what honeywell is a top tempting to accomplish it all points to one thing and that is we're going to put together is to lacerate works best back perhaps the one claims ray was still in the in the mix because he couldn't perform what honey what boeing was asking for the two legs read was certainly will for for sale and that is the in the cockpit to view with the displays it requires a wide powers onto a viewer and that is reflected in the honeywell technical proposal repeated just because i'm trying to save power and actually use the invention of the patent i'm going to steal some of the white for the vertical view again i only need a plus and minus forty five degree viewing angle in the defining what was being or for sale they did the on sale is the technical proposal and the price were for a document which was issued in june that's the water for sale this is what with him walking back to reginald to fuser discussion is a loaded discussion it carries with it everything that came before which the founders testified to before we had a talks about the design baseline for something called the critical of this our interview and what it says is the baseline is defined by the software ordering system for wireless documents and design specifications and drawings  no offer any actual device that met claims free until well after the party i think that plays directly into the ports policy concerns this was not going well are we in the