MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
i think we need to start with the fact that recently there was a one count indictment against my client charging him as a prohibited possessor because of that nineteen seventy five conviction for whatever reason placing a person in reasonable apprehension physically and in fact outside the criminal complaint charged him with intentionally or knowingly crossing physical injury not with any of the other direct correlation drawn in the arizona statutes the nature of the unicorn about judge version we have to go a little bit kind of circumstantial around to actually figure out what it means   zona you have to start out with thirteen dash twelve zero three with you basically defining simple assault if you will and then it becomes aggravated if these other circumstances should happen to occur and it panel in order to support a conviction under thirteen twelve zero three a one which is precisely the statute in question in this case even reckless conduct must cause actual physical injury for another person although the verbiage is different the intent of the drafting of the federal language which used physical force but actually to be more expansive then the term violence there was apparently a legislative compromise to kind of remedial purpose of the statute dealing with domestic violence to make it reaches broadly as possible and so when you're talking about physical force exposure to the elements you are not hitting the child but you're none the worse putting in a position where it's health is impaired which again if we track it that's the kind of common law battery   so basically our position is that's wrong fancher essentially already decided for the circuit that indeed arizona law does meet the requirement despite the apparent difference in terminology and  the correctness of the analysis is supported by the first circuit nason case which looking at the legislative history of the federal statute shows that it was intended to be interpreted broadly in order to reach the
had been a fundamental change  only people staying here are the maoists all of the youths have run away ignored forgotten selectively discarded that is not the way evidence should be selected your honor you cannot choose to look at the and we provided this letter and it was never ever acted upon nobody has even read it thank you your brief we basically said we should grant asylum or grant cat relief and i'm not sure we can do that under the facts of this case i'm saying basically there's no evidence to show that the government meant are the judge's decision is based on any facts to show a fundamental change in nepal and to be a decision does not mention the harm to his family the property of his being taken or to his  uncle's letter and chitwan stating they will kill you and break your legs there is no evidence to support a falling finding on any changed circumstances that's all i think it's a it's an erroneous decision to ask you to focus on that because it's that i'm not sure looking at this record what evidence there was to support the eventual conclusion that this individual could relocate to that specific location other than the fact that he once lived there what else is there that that supports that seems to me the evidence is that maoists are throughout nepal  there he had his uncle says there is danger there if he comes back so what's viewed in the light most favorable to the government what's the evidence that shows he could safely relocate to this location people who they clean this part of the country and then also have somebody who's lived there previously without incident but here i think you're saying all you have suggested he could safely relocate was the fact that he lived there is ok and it was in the record when it went up to the board the i j a said i'd consider all the evidence and you can safely relocate it didn't express we discussed this letter right kras and i have been met that well you see but my problem is i'm not it's clear the board didn't consider that letter the board's decision says the record contains no evidence that it would no longer be safe or reasonable for the respondent to once again if if we read the letter the same way if i redo it it said we judge press suggests the record does can contain evidence so we have a factual misstatement in the board's opinion i'm not sure how important the evidence is i'm not sure whether or not it would outweigh the other evidence but that's not our job that's the board's job isn't yes kerry has made it is it that's the way the court is going i'll just have to see this because the house all is is arguing the other issue is one why whether he can relocate anywhere and it is whether he can carry on with his political activities and his religion that's the key and that's what came out and i provided the court of appeals  is material changes widen the communist give them back his land it took away his land which is a severe under the b i president decisions formal persecution and never even compensated that he lives
after the our human it's been at least i don't know just going just did this with us before but after the argument we would love to meet you and we can only do that if we invite both you will find that things change rapidly and so i can see where the evidence might have been put on but how do you get to the three and poor but still i mean how do you make that leap right so the  how can it be reasonable assuming it's true let's just assume that that allegation is true how is it reasonable to not call the trial counsel if for no other reason to rebut this issue i can see where you could say well they didn't call it because they intended to withdraw that claim but we have no real evidence in the record i mean do you really think just generally the courts at this level should
but that does not need to be really read again at this point but it's our position that she wasn't speaking to the intent of the defendant when she talked about she didn't know what he meant when he s was referring to the video footage that was on the trooper stache mean that i believe when she did her credibility determination she found that i was in favor of what trooper owen testif watched the bullet but you can't see the bullet so i can only go by the circumstantial evidence and the surrounding circumstances that if his hands are facing are in the same position with the gun pointing at his face and he turns around in the experts who testified that there was one bullet that was recovered at the scene that matched the defendant's guy on the firearms expert that testified that he he did the test on the defendant's gun and the defendant's gun could not have accident accidently be discharged once the safety was off he testified that you have to put the safety off and then you have to have at least a ten pound trigger pull to be able to fire the gun so  also aggravated discharge of a firearm had a peace officer beyond a reasonable doubt it's the trial court duty to make credibility determinations and resolve any conflicts not only in the defendant's testimony but in everyone's found that the state proved all the elements of the fence this they had to prove that they did and have a criminal intent to cause the death of an individual and to a substantial step toward committing that act with the knowledge that he would kill an individual and the state prove demonstrates the contrary and as i just state just does not believe that the trial judge's statements about not knowing his intentions
wide open knowingly voluntarily intelligent lay as required by the due process clause of the constitution since ruhleben was written by the supreme court the concept of what constitutes an offense or a charge has been greatly broaden not being a felony is not sufficient to be aggravated it depends on the nature of the offense our complaints in this case is that the magistrate judge who conducted the change of plea proceedings did not make has a right to to contest the aggravated nature of the found when he gets to the district judge in fact the magistrate judge then goes on to say that because you're pleading guilty by cleaving guilty or not having a trial you're giving up your right under rule eleven the and the expanded notion of what a charge is the magistrate judge had to explain the nature of the aggravated felony and it's significant and that just didn't happen here and that's that's why we believe that this case must be  course in the pre sentence report is this little two line that justice eight levels are added as the defendant was deported after being convicted of theft period and if you flip over to paragraph thirty it says no more about it in the description  was was no angel he was kind of a problem child but on the other hand it's not clear that he has an aggravated felony prior to his deportation either and for that reason we believe that the case must be reversed and i'd like to save a few minutes at the end for  a lawyer for any of the proceedings of course he had the right to a lawyer for sentencing i agree with the court that's correct that he had that right and i would suggest to the court that the magistrate judge did not say anything to the contrary government's brethen referred to in the excerpts of record the all of the mentioned you don't get counsel it's all in relation to at trial you are giving up your right to the rights you're giving up if you plead guilty you're not going to get a trial you're not going to get to cross examine witnesses and so all of these things go away at trial you don't get a trial you don't get a lawyer at trial you don't get any of these things whether it's retained counsel or appointed counsel at trial and then after that when there's a discussion i was that it's more that there was no contest or there was no dispute at sentencing that the offense qualified as a theft offense and was an aggravated felony therefore there was no evidence introduced into the  the government had filed a motion to expand the records which include a particular document this court denied that request therefore the records are not before this court so i would have to go outside the record to tell you where the documents come from
can't really do that
i'm out here because it's the first day of school where it all to vist elementary school and we always think about the parents the students the staff we always forget the bus drivers the bus drivers make our community safe they slow us down they make sure that our students get to and from class and without them there would be half a school so i decided let's do something nice for the bus drivers and show them that we care let them know that we're thinking about them and thanking them for the service they provide so they've got that he backs for the bus driver got bottled drivers i think it's really wonderful that people are recognizing the bus drivers who work so hard and sometimes are not or not appreciate or given those thank yous i know that the transportation thanks them but it's nice when our community is able to say thank
tolling but then say i think you still didn't make it in time because from the time that you roll eyes that there was a problem which was august twenty second you had thirty days representing  k thank you very much
but we were talking about the cost of jewelry you do quite a bit of custom yes yes well i do make a lot of custom made products now you know if the customer needs something we now even use customers know i could actually go on that site and i could design my own years used to where you can make your own ring pick and choose stone quality the size shape like a round square and that will just become on top of that ring you will see completing your ring right next to you and you'll see the price right next to it so and then you can send it to me as that inquiry and then i will make it very quality work and we would actually repair diamonds as well this is something that i would like to mention we would recut the diamond let's say you have all diamond all all that parents given sustain their old mine cut diamond we can recut that diamond make it brand new style modern bling cut increase the value for you and you can have just beautiful piece with today's market which will same time as we remove them some inclusions can be there that include increases the quality and that makes the stone work more and you just if you example let's say you have this little picture of them and it will tell you the certificate now i want to have up prices the prices of the prices were very comparable yes i mean we would beat anybody sort of price if i see some people trying to go in you know b but it's enhanced for good and there were comes out you know moves beautiful like really stuff like this before on that was genuine and cost still in the millions of dollars but now you can have it now people actually getting there is the middle class a little bit kind of that disappearing that of some people come asking lower prices like less than five thousand dollar yes it's well for the clocks i have a gentleman who does it i don't do that myself he's been doing that for over forty five years and i give it to him he comes to my shop and does
before we get started on ships using regular rocket fuel that's just an expanding with atomic power from the larry and that's might be pretty hard to control well i've got it all figured out stand back please look by setting the controls on this model rocket i thought you said it was going to slowly circle the room at least it did come back
or it is highly likely to have been and would not be there and he could have easily stepped on the contents of the plastic bag of those still out onto the ground which would have caused a toxic chemical spill spill a certified
here promoting what appears to be two different causes but they're really connected one cause i'm leading a movement to rid the state of washington of all criminal drug cartels that's what the second over here is we're addressing a group climate abrupt climate change our most gigantic existential threat ever and it's coming to roost right now how are the two connected this poster here summarizes the story right now we're on a highway to hell that's not the way i want it it's just the way that it is and we urgently need to find an off ramp from the highway to hell towards a path toward a whole world now there's a lot of possible offramps the one that i'm proposing centers around organized crime first eliminating the humpty dumpty of criminal drug cartels which we can get rid of a soon as we repealed prohibition which we can do with the stroke of a and expand our mandate from there to get rid of all forms of organized crime you know the traditional mafias of the world sicilian mafia russian mafia etc with the political capital we gain from getting rid of traditional forms of organized crime we cash in and we expand the mandate even further to include organized crimes against mother earth herself anyway this message all the way to the u s mexican border i'm kicking off a national tour this summer and so we're going to be searing aiding the country of mexico from the border with church the construction industry the transportation industry the banking industry all of that put together constitutes one massive organized crime against mother earth mother earth is dying in the midst of the sixth mass extinction we're losing about two hundred species per day and that number is going to increase the rate we're going these crimes against mother earth in a similar way to how we're going to treat criminal drug cartels we need to eradicate them it's as simple as that we cannot afford more organized crimes either against our people are against mother earth we must eradicate all forms are united right now criminal drug cartels happen to be the quickest and easiest low hanging fruit of organized crime to we take out the criminal drug cartels we will have mor organized crimes against mother earth that's the big life and death question so cute address that we need a massively higher form of intelligence than anything terrestrial we've seen on earth today in all of our history we need radical collective intelligence collective intelligence that gets to the roots of our problems and finally solve on register we are building a platform for collective intelligence you
seven ok and very very complete service i know my wife has bought dishes from you my brothers of bought jewelry from you you would get a great facility and  but we were talking about the cost of jewelry you do quite a bit of custom yes yes well i do make a lot of custom made products now you know if the customer needs something we now even use customer that site and i could design my own years each to where you can make your own ring pick and choose stone quality the size shape like a round square and that will just become on top of th ring you will see completing your ring right next to you and you'll see the price right next to it so and then you can send it to me as that inquiry and and i will make it very interesting exact diamond make it brand new style modern berlin cut increase the value for you and you can have just beautiful piece with today's market which will increase the value that you know how much of the store what i lose in the pr berlin fit and that will increase the value of the stone and the same time as we remove them some inclusions can be there would cut that diamond let's say one color would cut that diamond it can become vs quality one point nine or one point eight the price beautiful like really stuff like this before only was genuine and cost millions and millions of dollars but now you can have it for much less price you know and look million yes it's all for the clocks i have a gentleman who does it i don't do that myself he's been doing that for over forty five years and i give it to him he comes to my shop and does it
invasion i realize that but i did my best your best is not good enough i'm going to fly down to earth at once and take charge of operations myself i will welcome you i have parity you need in the meantime have your man go after and any other key personnel they can reach we must delay the completion of any ray guns on earth until my invasion features ready yet your excellent and invasion why do you want to invade the earth because the atmosphere on the moon has become so thin and dry it is impossible for us to raise food except in pressurized greenhouses and none of us can move outside without helmets so we're planning a mass migration rio you will find that conquering the earth isn't so simple and it will be because of our atomic weapons on the moon we have an element very considerate of you to give me all this information is there some reward for your long journey but unfortunately i cannot permit you to return to maybe i have something to say about that he may be able to take care of i
party on the police against the petitioner while he lived in india and after he had already departed as we counted to him by his mother and by the head of the village with the following sort of dividing line in the case individuals came to his farm and threatened him he was not there the next day the police came to arrest him again luckily he was not there based on the information  from his family after he had left he understood that while he was still in india the purpose of his arrest was because of his political activities and his membership in a social group which constituted his father and if you look at  police for the petitioner to appear and then later as told by his mother police allegations that he now cohorts with militants abroad because he's in the united states i think that again the party should be able to address that issue what are what is the situation today in two thousand and nine as the court hearing wasn't two thousand and four or five even if the conditions have improved answer first i did know that means first it was my father then when they beat my father i became more active what activities did you have with the party after father's being two thousand and one after that i went to a party me is that the only activity you had and long story short after four or five questions basically yes there is he simply went to meetings act and his his own testimony is that his father was the one who was more active he did he did engage in some activities in  i believe it was the police the second time there is there's a problem throughout the record your honor basically there's a confusion between police and b j p party members and it's not clear you know on the one hand men come without persecution well not necessarily your honor first because because it's so special point and it's more his father seems to be the one who's more he's more interested that's the that's the question is whether the record compels that conclusion i understand your honour's concern it is that it's a relatively brief decision for some of these immigration case that she could have gone on and discussed perhaps in more update that site four thirty five after two sixteen discussing some of those change conditions there have since been more change conditions you know how that affects this cour indias and use a big country has problems are local so i think i think you can consider those in the context perhaps of whether remained would be futile not necessarily you know looking at th to the issue of the change country conditions it's the government's burden to show that conditions have changed as the record stands right now there is nothing compelling here to show that conditions have changed and i'm sure her had categorized him also as tillman anti national for whatever reasons they targeted his father first it's really not in the record why but they did we got to take his testimony as truthful because he
fair thing here be to just send this back and tell the l j you forgot to give any reasons for not accepting the testimony of morris if you intend