or or there's not the greatest amount of money involved in the case it's this is a big big really important case because while there's tens of thousands of homes that get sold in illinois every regular old windows as the record would show i guess smaller than these majestic ones here but the same concept constitute walls under the form the plaintiff's case was limited completely to their view that our clients had all sleepy stated that there were no material defects in floors or was number six or and as of course aware from our brief we're not here to challenge the governance we're here just to deal dictionary definition is weakens the case and say that's what we should do our of course interestingly right behind your honour's we have a wall you know we have a window we have a door that records walk through america as you walk through even with your robes are you did not think you were walking through a wall you think you were walking through a doorway when i walk out of the three i don't have superman version i'm not looking through a wall i'm looking through a window where there are three now the national problem in our view with the trial judge and again he's not and he's writing our thinking out a clean slate because there really was no illinois opinion on point and frankly we couldn't find any opinion from any jurisdiction and most states have the statutory forms that have been at over the last decade or so so we don't there's fraud it's the way or and there are really no duty on the sellers part this was anything legislature said we're not going with that anymore we want to protect homebuyers so they created  his ruling that the act is designed to eliminate the copyright and to rule but then he goes forward and still says that he sees the act as requiring broad requirements and should be broadly construed in a manner that's i guess the order the result may have been for your veins or you go back to the beginning and say that there should have been strict construction now we take a look at the form the form has twenty three separate questions  it hasn't in this case has to do with water coming over the garage door water moisture rotting out windows water coming through a parody of gore if you look at it's questions two through five on the form that's where we have  found at least something six or seven states at hale right in there or that have shot was i will refer to it that that's all part and after they list all of the facts and they also say well we forgot one anything else that's  immaterial to the transaction you never fill out the legislature obviously put it done that other legislators in other states knew how to do that in addition in other states we've cited they've specifically created forms that have language that says a seller has the slows in certain conditions and they're providing the following information and in our view you have to look at the whole statues legislative history and it looks like they want to do something more than they did but they just didn't get around to it then they forgot to put the twenty fourth question yeah so conditions now we get into you know what is a wall and we cited the dictionary definition and if you look in our brief it seems to wast that a wall is something of a more permanent solid structure issue of what a wall is again common sense dictionary definition and i know in the other side's brief they say well it really isn't just a wall it's something that has the purposes of wall or maybe all part of a wall that would all be a great argument if the legislature had said in its form something like a wall or something having the same purpose of a wall they didn't say that they said floors and walls and while i don't think we have any real duty to explain what the legislature may or may not and thinking i do want out there when you think about how a wall or a floor is way more permanent  it's structural it's supportive and any defect that will be a floor or a wall is going to be less observable to a place of coming through a home inspection or they're paid a home inspector statutory more easily prove fraud remedy and in that situation they said liberal construction in our act here they don't say that and you're right you actually wrote the opinion i cited in we're not really even making the are you know we we didn't import of course in the trial trying to say that this form is to be kind of taken with a grain of salt you get your own specter who doesn't find these things which is what we said  not a wall would consist of doors and windows you have to consider the function of a window you know obviously as council lunch in your door  ingress and egress through a window you can open up you get some light that comes through but a door or window lost the service of a very practical function and that is it tended to keep the elements out of your house rain exactly right they serve different functions but the basic function of a door and a window when they're closed is the key of whether type and that's one of the evils that the through a ceiling or whether it's through a basement i've yet actually we've had cases were involved walls i mean i'm sorry windows and doors so i kind of look at this and then ask yourself w to this day it still does every time it rains it is wet from that dry for all the way back to the back of the garage or standing water in their eyes every time it rains is that really a truthful answer to the legislature arm with respect to the inspection if we really is a roll of that what the inspection shows or doesn't show the seller of the property has a duty to disclose the facts that they're aware of and the you have to look at the statute in its entirety and looking at the language of it if you know looking at those the words wall on what subject visited druss what was the intent of the legislature in that an act in that  have a question based on items five and six when you come here i know five it seems that the legislature recognize the difference between electrical defect in a rough ceiling or a chimney as they added in  es or material in six it's material effects in the wall floors and that's not a clue the language with reference is there a possibility that defect they also have to disclose whether there's a leak when you compare it to the next number which is sex talking about walls and windows they have to disclose material defects but there's no reference to the do you think couldn't touch on the points that were made to i think i already alluded to it the argument about the same function the same effect it's not what the legislative distinction is point to i don't know how  world under any circumstances our garage door out of the attached garage begins or a wall that just seems to make no talent sense whatsoever i think another part of the problem what's running through this is that we have this form that sellers who are selling a house go out these forms i would assume even if they went to a lawyer a boy would tell him fill out the form and that's what they would say i don't how regular people are to look at a form and decide well it says walls or floors or we're supposed to the side that our garage door qualifies as a wall or a floor but justice mcdavid i think many are now i understand your question the from the i was up here before about the point that there's a disclosure duty on the part of the seller but there's an inspection right on the part of the buyer and in my view and i don't think that their arrogance i think actually your point that you're considering think actually helps us because i don't think the fact that they've given the right to not want to also have an inspection and temper the duty with th rights they act that means that we are creating a broader form where we are creating a twenty four questions of the form we i think i already mentioned we've all they are sworn against them then discuss this is not an all these are not all glass windows or all glass walls they're not walls of windows by any means and even on a penny odors of the pictures are in there in the record it's just a regular  us like if the legislature wanted to speak more broadly than just the word defects they know again how to do what they didn't do that in the sixth question you know in terms of leaks or in terms of something having the same function or a purpose or a