a crass the risk of recidivism posed by sex offenders is frightening and high that's the language that the supreme court of united states employ so my question for had to do with oral sex offenders it was a registration case we're not talking about well sex all right and i understand that and that's why i said this is language yes but it is a language that provides a backdrop this is when the a requirement for approval can be granted this term and by the pennsylvania supreme court interpretation of patrolling statute however in addition i do not believe that the me minimal page for a dash six of the policy the four categories are sex offenders arsonists people who have significant mental health disability and people who have significant physical health disability and what we department has determined through his experience as that these four groups are individuals who have difficulty finding a place to live when they are released from prison i understand that any inmate including people who are sex offenders if they find a place to live while we are still in prison like their parole if they find a place to live performed we get out this policy doesn't even apply in addition if you look at the first page of the policy you will notice that there are three groups of sex offenders or reaction one group of sex offenders that doesn't even follow his policy at all individuals who have been committed of a sexual offense but based on certain based on the testing seem to have a greater likelihood and it's those who in addition haven't found a place to live outside a community correction center to who's come  and the pearling order in many instances is going to say parole to an approved home plan or to a community corrections center if you get paroled to a community corrections center the idea is while you're ok now i understand that then then it that word is in their hands it doesn't mean they get to walk right out of the jail ok what it means for those who don't have a home clear let's be clear we're only going to talk now about those who happens is the department has discovered this these four groups that i named at the beginning are people when they go into a community correction center have difficulty finding a home because they're sex offenders they're arsonists they have very serious and mental health issues or very serious physical health issues and usually when we're talking that this is a call how we're actually talking point there are a limited number of beds these are hard to place offenders are individuals who when you put them in a setting for the most part are either not able to with these people the turnaround time we'd be two or three years that doesn't change the math about what exactly it is it doesn't allow us to pour all other individuals who are not hard to place that don't have a home place it doesn't change  individuals in other words the rest of them are continuing to move through the system there's always going to be some to try to give them every opportunity we can the reality is unfortunately we've found that people who acts out with no home plan back the hard reality they are not people who can't find a home plan and when you're dealing specifically with a sex offender subcategory part of that is the parole board restrictions on where they can live is another way i'm not sure that the facts statistically are in dispute i don't i don't doubt that the plaintiffs could find some individuals we don't know do know for actually going to vote so how do we know if the factual but i think response would be it's also counterproductive if there's somebody who doesn't even get to go to see something because there are some state so they maxed out in prison other they were more likely to find a home plant because they worked hard to pla