this legislature created a statute that basically says hey we don't want child sex offenders going to certain kinds of places like daycare and afterschool programs that are essentially places for children or parents drop their kids off and hope that there's no wing of evidence taking place in this case the parties agree on all the facts and that being the case where you have read facts when you have really a question of what is the meaning of the provisions of the statute what is meant by the phrase there is no context here and the sex offender statutes everybody knows are just actions that exist in states all around the country these are statutes that have had some warning constitutional issues sitting in the background in some states the parts of the you ever the word facility doing to the book oh i don't know i didn't look up the definition of facility but i think if if we're saying that the bus which is transporting parents and children towards a field trip destination if that's not a facility and what the the ball factory as we're referring to in this case is considered facility that he's noticed that he can be on the boss but not talk that i made here necessarily is that the this field trip to this ball factory was directed towards children based on the evidence that the union home easter seals and jumpstart another is hopefully directed toward their children make a better home make it and we're in the if we're going to use that broad interpretation don't have the answer to that i know there's a list there's a catch all i described as a catch on this list of the daycare center before and after school programs things like that will list certainly similar to those  case in the bench who had been described whether or not this boss was a facility exclusively directed toward kids and i think that is a fact if i may be i'm a little confused as to whether or not that's legal issue of whether or not they actually have to decide whether the boss in this case was a facility i feel like that is a fact that had an aside by the trier of fact that's why i clued in the center view that i did in my a long case but in jury trial in which there was a bunch of evidence presented there were witnesses on each side and it every one of those pieces either in the paragraph that identifies a standard review or in the very next paragraph the court says and there was conflicting witness testimony in other thing i would see as the facility question is one question to be sure but in some ways i think we don't have to worry about the solution question if we focus on the exclusively directed toward part of the statute because the reality is that he was getting on a bus and was heading there and that bus was full of young kids who were part of a field trip from their city they were to school parking lot and a bunch of kids with you know the third graders were getting on this bus and going to the ball factory and he got on the house with a bunch of you know third graders indictment in this case is also effective because what we've been talking about your today is the ball factory and you can never come up with anything else we're talking about the events on that day put on by the jump start program but this indictment in this case was exclusively about easter seals facility identified in the indictment was quote unquote meanly easter seals and this i think is really the point when you get to the facility question they said the facility was easter seals we put out evidence you run the field th