considered older brother suffer harm by congress party members so it is very feasible that the family was keeping records of the harm their children suffered  the opening breathe for air quotes to the pigeons in the record which really shows the the immigration judge inserted the argument and the questioning of the petitioner by for his records yesterday the future he needed the medicine including that was his explanation for why he is not iesus father to get the listener but the letter didn't didn't letter for their record and gave an example when his mother passed away they have paid identification documents for her in the same vein they wish to collect documentation that should furnish and don't necessarily  the nature of the medicine that was provided sure i was just maybe i was just maybe i just i just wanted correct my my recollection of it not the raf i thought the medicines the nature of the medicines was were members of those parties therefore to answer the question no would be truthful that  being never said that he was beaten by the police yes but if he we have to look at what he was police beat him as well as he did when he was on direct when he testified on direct and the nd opportunity that he had to tell the asylum officer that he was beat by the police was when he was asked are you afraid of anyone else who works for the government of your country including the police and then have there was not but all members of the place he said besides the congress party is there is there and when have you ever been harmed by members of the congress party who  say three opportunities i don't know to me you have to look at what questions were around and without being precise on those issues i have a difficult time saying that someone  reading of the evidence the nd chance according to one when questioned about the format of the credible fear interview notes you shine or are these sort of standard questions that are of laid out what they're going to do and then they ask the questions and then they just forget again the answer to that kind of what's going on here yes but the asylum officers are not  or thirty four where he said he went to the police and then the day after with a friend to kill you if you came back and then he asked another question do you think the police officer would have told you so it's it's a procession like it's yet again if we look at the evidence and the whole i as well back that specific question not arguments just that quest said he was getting his task port to reason is about the passport as why he thought at st he said we all got one we were all making passports and then the threat later that he was regarding that we're going why he got the passport that he got it in preparation for leaving the country because he felt that his life was in danger and that the administrators brecker want to five thousand two hundred and fifty three so he gave two very different reasons forward quote because everyone's getting them they can also get passports within the subset of the other reason because there's fear so i don't see those as being well the agency found this to be an inconsistency he said at one point we all thought it and then another he said i got it because i wanted to leave the country because i feared for my life those are two different things to say coun know rest is average credibility to make on that but in this case the agency came up with three just french specific cogent reasons and going back to the hospital letter not to beat a dead horse he initially said his father bought it for him then he said well we got it for our record because we just want to have records like this but then he also said when the immigration judge pressed him on it he said well like i said he needed it for his and if he ever went to the doctor again and when the immigration judge pointed out this is a say what you like what medicine he received he's just he couldn't come up with another answer he said that's the reason we got and your honors it was i'm sorry is there not a question of anything further after in isolation and reject them one by one instead we have to look at the totality of the circumstances and if you look at the totality of the circumstances and this case the record does not compel the conclusion that  infer what how a medical record in india is supposed to look like and what kind of medicine a doctor is supposed to articulate in a medical letter that might be used in the future by another she get the passport because you were harmed when he never testified and as i mentioned earlier refuted that allegation ok ok thank you for your