stance but based on the underlying motion to reopen it was in effect the talk of the government by doing that and i called the government attorney and they said they were going to speak to their client and i have not basically and he would have another thirty days to get approved i am a thirty forgotten supervisor said look i have an appeal pending i need and i want thirty interviewers earliest convenience and he could have got it done they father i point five in the wrong place which was later returned because the district if you have to take to be a feel fine tonight probably one target and then even while your motion to remand is pending that will take you out a matter of shahr so that may be clogging up your case load so i don't i don't agree with that policy i could have seen as the artist the checker came out i could have said look change of case law this motion should have been granted under new pathos and be a routine the grantees motions and that's what i think should have happened i think with clearly ineffect time element but we're in the wrong posture from what other significance is in his case that we should be looking at how do you mean well you know the other cases you've got smuggling and everything and there's nothing in your face in your client's record that i can  margaret i had i understand all that i'm going into my spitting into no man's land here again because i was trying to help in this case it seems like there's only one thing driving this and that is because of circumstance of the ways claim was filed and timing and because we can't get folks out of the country when we see allegedly what about the times run and so on his site he's got the fact that he's not eligible but because of regulations in the law we're going to say  didn't do it right and you left the time around and because of our system that doesn't work too well you now become eligible but you can't get the elegy can't get there from here i think that's where i am i understand your concern that i have been the end of the fact that time running because of our system which people in different get every day to go into a different category and this folks this fellow did exactly that now i'm not i'm not saying it's right or wrong i just find myself in the man's land because if we apply it had an opportunity to apply for relief what he had to do he was still south of us all he had to do was comply with this order of voluntary departure as he promised he would make the united states interferes with and that you know there's immigration processing rules for reasons and it is you know it's overwhelming there's several aliens and they stand in the united states that are here illegally some are trying to enter the united states legally and we can't claim now to say i've been here five years he would bypass the normal process which might cut off or disrupt the people who are working the process correctly in quotas or whatever to get it and  person is attempting to enter the united states in a lawful manner or going back against the system doesn't work so unless you do the rules exactly right interference with the system is enough to say that we're going to have to adhere to the strict application of law have i really have a problem with what i was trying to see what the government had to say it seems as though the what's being driven here is the system doesn't work too well in handling these things and the time element keeps changing the picture because every day know fallen into one of those catch twenty two she says no verify the law because if it's the system has to work and what's your best case to how you can get through only if you want for the time passing for five years