provide verification for their disclosures and what's really important is they also filed a motion to compel our arbitration i think what was going interesting in that motion was that the in the evidence very record at twenty five point  can remember women could own property the deed and the deed was my community property and i don't know how a short sale transaction to be taking place when i as owner is not a party for the contract then we have lockhart who claimed that privilege did produce ducking the claim of privilege and then we have world savings bank who refused to produce documents whether or not they were privileged others during the whole time the district court was ruling on the four orders for dismissal orders was deprived of the opportunity have the just short sale try transaction to actually see it and the fundamental dockings that required for me to respond to those motions to dismiss and then as to the then at the summary judgment level violation well these real estate transactions are taking place with respect to my property were taking place after i had filed bankruptcy and at the point of filing bankruptcy in february of one thousand nine hundred seventy any tr as well as in the district as well as in the bankruptcy court misrepresent the value of the property in proceeded on with this transaction if there wasn't a bankruptcy  stand in effect and the fundamental error of that at the trial level was that i asked in my motion and lemony number six for the jury have an instruction as to what was required under the bankruptcy  in other words in march of ninety ninety seven world savings bank james garcia had no business in my home because there was a bankruptcy stay in effect if they thought they had approval of at the pretrial conference which is in the record three one three equally every motion that was filed with respect to  filed as well as the opposition to the motion eliminate as well as the arguments that were presented at the pretrial conference i also think that at that point where there was an inquiry at the trial proceeding asking for the two to inquire into matters relating to the conviction and the court denied the request i think that those only only opportunities for counsel can address that matter and if the district court is not going to allow you to present that matter or one final question on page eighty one of your brief you want sanctions because you're pro se i don't understand you're an attorney admitted to practice  i'm acting i'm an attorney but i am also acting on my own behalf and in this matter and i think that well with respect to the rule eleven sanctions i think that there are the court didn't did second circuit second circuit thank you the eleventh circuit has recently addressed the issue and is decided that has made a distinction between the fact of if someone is an attorney and acting in pro se whether or not the attorney is claiming that they've lost income us to defer to the court in terms of whether there are any specific questions or issues that the court would like to have addressed and go from there or simply saying to the minister for each of us to make a presentation  to collect and that is an issue that kind of came through the briefs as i read them but i couldn't put my finger on it i'm not aware of that i mean i'm here on behalf of citi mortgage but that's not a claim that was made against him and i know you're well prepared for this argument any evidence of that yes your honor i think that as a matter of law short sell transaction can be can treated as a form of debt collection in this circumstance real estate brokers just like attorneys are not when the the amount of the mortgage is less that the value of the property is less than the amount of the mortgage but the payoff of the loan requires that certainly holders will be paid off as night at least the circuit held that the actual physical and the act of certain ways of handling the telegram situation the western union resulted in a