concerns first of all around us i think you for the opportunity for us to be able to come to you and explain my behavior in my words that were written to file a motion for the hearing court however if you took on this responsibility don't you think it was your responsibility then to review other pleadings similar to these to consult an appellate attorney and have what the appropriate content court executed its responsibilities it might be one thing when you're trying to use we're arguing in open court on motions in front of me and unfortunately sometimes the attorneys attack one another but it's pretty rare that  but as i see it i think one time i had class with the judge and it was ready very quickly on the floor assuring us that this would never happen again it would never happen again i absolutely assure you and that was going to be one of my final points is that when i look back as i stated first and foremost i'm deeply regret i have offended this court secondly i deeply regret that i feel like i failed my client and i will never fire anything like this i will never even draft anything like th week and preparing for into bigger emotionally charged divorce trials and at the trial even in this tease my emotions and get the best of me and this is a very emotionally charged case i i was never an honest i the other side was an honest for raising their voice and that that's not typically my character which is why i reflect on this there's no excuse and it's completely out of character for me and that it will never happen again i'm very disappointed in him you know  you say you have not use this language you were presented yourself this way before trial judges and that has probably a lot to do with they're sitting right in front of you well we're sitting right in front of you to see and that is something you have to remember and if you ever happen to see the supreme court they're sitting right there too and this is something that you have to be keenly aware of the other thing i think that is important is in reading the disposition is obvious if you read from your language what you want to read the biggest problem seems to have with us is we said that we had a limited cracker we didn't same didn't have it in the record but we had a limited record because during the course of your  you talked about the gavel being gangrel case continuously you questioned george tender shot about the money that he gave to you rachel and you talked about these things that happened  whether it was in texas or here and we have no knowledge of that other than you are representations if you want those issues considered properly their record should have been in front of us may i ask the question well let me just finish this martin and maybe i'll cover you also only provided this transcript from the actual last hearings and not the motions to reconsider there were filed and you were three of them i think two by  and one by opposing counsel and things are sitting at order or in the orders one of them prepared by you talking about a hearing and we have nothing from those hearings to go forward as we did certainly some cases we can decide on the record but it is just is enough is pointed out in the scarlet c case these cases have to be dealt with differently they generous and we need everything physically possible to make the correct decision and so when we said we had a limited record we listen to correct her we didn't say we didn't have any and that's where i think you were we're both sort of capsized you said we didn't have we obviously didn't have the record we were ignorant of the record we simply ignored our responsibility ignored what what i'm confused about is the two binders of exhibits that had to have made it contained the garden airliners report which and contained separately the report from the texas case where everything was was laid out and all of the facts and all of the how the cases were intermeshed was all explained throughout the guardian ad litem for court and the attachments so i think part of my confusion on  happening and we don't yes there is a reduction in her visitation time that may be stipulated to and be stipulated to the change of custody apparently or through to the change of custody but we don't know why and that was probably in the record somewhere that may have helped and the point i'm trying to make if you cannot cherry pick those things that might be favorable to your client and not take things that might be favorable to the other side if you want to appeal you have the burden of going forward in giving us a complete record if you didn't act but that doesn't mean you didn't give us any record and that's seems to be how you read our disposition so it  s you need to pay attention to our language and we certainly paid attention to yours and so you do seem to have great compassion for your clients have compassion for your time and cannot in the legal process you want to talk to him outside if you want to tell him what degree more you are that's fine but you're not a great lawyer you're not a compassionate lawyer and as you indicated you may do a disservice to your client by attacking the people that you want to time your side innocent and you i don't know if that's what happened with judge greer heard his decision i have no way to talk to him has submitted only transcripts from the final hearing dates this case was alive two years before that final hearing and whether there were transcripts of those other hearings that you could have secured or bystanders reports for those other hearings where the judge her of the things that he or she in this case judge hear her could consider in his final disposition we didn't have any idea in several situations where an order was prepared your name is at the bottom and now the order saying you prepared it and it talks about eight hearing yes i don't know what happened to the hearing it may have been very critical to you very critical to rachel and events described in the record that's what i'm talking about oh i think you randy is we didn't have a record that sam i i definitely misread that statement i thought you were indicating that i had provided transcripts from ocean i guess it doesn't matter where the cochlear really i was wrong in my impression and as you stated my boat capsized at that point we try to use language that will be helpful to both council and parties and i think