board immigration appeals orders for two basic reasons st we believe the political opinion analysis of the agency is missing any express finding on his political asylum claim and to the extent it makes one that he fears generalized violence that is manifestly contrary to the record the administrative record in this case which shows a very specific well founded fear backed up by the agency's own findings about the persecut did they analyze the full westernised americanised christian canyon opposed to al shabaab rather they analyze various components of it and indeed in one case a group involving kenyan we have and it has nothing to do with our so with regard knowing the record is the border where the respondents decided to explain why his fear is of generalized violence my crime his through out stated the very specific reason that he would be targeted not we submit that the particular social group in the their political opinion characteristics are targeted as a group that practice he belongs to the group and the group is targeted in his country group that's not the entirety of the group that he's asserting his has demonstrated american characteristics that is living here for now fourteen years three american children and his political beliefs and supported the kenyan policy with regard to returning someone returning from the america who is christian would be subject to persecution westernized or americanized christian kenyans and the  westernized americanised in this case some part of our definition of the social group but in this case the way we need that definition in that inclusion in the group is his fourteen years in the us is history american citizen children and other american reason it's a part of both claims the political opinion the social group is part of the social group case in the sense that that helps to define him in his group and so on coming in from for many years away with american children children and christian in fact one of agency and now to this court so you're basically making a kind of synergy argument there is enough on the record that under each of the categories of silent ground together with his personal history of period of time in the united states with children and if you consider them not distinctly but as part of the whole it raises a claim of fear that is not merely the sum of our apps of the of the distinct underlying categories is that basically you're right that is correct although i don't mean to say that we don't fully meet the definition of protection under the political opinion ground or the social programs but the fear that you reference yes it is it is the sum of its parts but he has in our view specifically developed the political opinion claim in the social group claim and more to the point is he has not really fully reviewed either one and again i don't want to repeat but on the on the political opinion claim christian returning from the america plus christian america one of westernized but it would be only a rejects your number two if they have it analyzed the entire social group presented their violating their very own president  reasoning would be located if there is really no risk to christians the mere fact that he's returning from america they're specifically saying that eighty two percent of the country is christians i don't know that's even true but they're they've only analyzed that part and they have not analyzed the full characteristics that make up our social group so if it's person returning who has these political opinions which he has demonstrated and then that just couldn't stand to your political opinion climb right which we believe political so he has not been active politically in the sense of being a member of a party or speaker he has stated his views he's been credited with having those if that's that is his presentation as a person with the american ties with the christian religion puts him in the category of people who could be viewed not necessarily but could be viewed as a opposed to al shabaab and the very type of people in universities in upscale malls in resort towns were targeted specifically for those reasons and so no he doesn't have a political resume his words that the ouster back terrorist group actually attacked everybody except except muslims there's no evidence in the record that shows that christians were highlighted or attacked any different than any other group of people pitching your argument to the christian summer and singled out notes could be christians are singled out to some degree but they're actually the christians that are being harmed essentially sort of winning when you look at their focus the focus again as much on christians per se it's almost as if christians cannot get out of the way through  are in the region and they do get targeted but it's not the they're not the only ones they are they are harming it's not just this things to them south like i said it's all the muslims and the non muslims can include the one is whether the agency said anything about it and you were beginning to answer sort of in those terms but there is a separate question of whether his briefing on it he'll has any particular risk as a individual christian because eighty percent of the population is actually christian and that's probably why a stronger argument might have been pattern practice however as the  occurred occurred two years apart and the remainder of that and all the other attack that appeared to be in a country condition reports are in the northeastern coastal area the central part of the region doesn't have the  experiences of these particular attacks the only place in central kenya that does experience any attack this east lake which they mentioned and that may already the record actually shows that he lives one hundred and fifty kilometers away from nairobi so his parents have fortunately not been subjected to these acts of terrorist harm because they are kind of remote from where the activity has taken place again and there isn't there hasn't been anything to record it shows that as a matter of fact if you route actually appears in the record in team places and the one place if i can to find it refers to workers rights and in another place in the country there's a condition evidence it appears as a they talk about a community organiser in our place and not what to completely widespread or are throughout kenya that an l s t can show some particular reason why he would be singled out under these isolated attack positions that he has any other schemes for generalized violent but as noted before the violence that has taken place in kenya is not specific any everybody is kind of subject into these particular reason religions are subject to harm  have discretion to do that but on this record the board appears to have decided to do the one plus one analysis that the court has decided and based on the this court that this court but the president here in the the persons who are defined within your group that said if you combine the they're articulate a particular social group claim that immigration judge actually cares and you combined his christianity would fall within the group because there's no description of what's considered westernized what's considered americanize i mean it could be your speech it could be your clothes it could be you know cultural norms but without knowing what those things are we not really know which for the harm they very specifically talk about places of worship not of any particular faith the characteristics that my client shares are specifically documented in the record and i think that goes to the social distinction component of the p s g analysis that he has asserted but i will still go back to the fact that i don't think we've ever seen a decision on the social group that has been asserted i think that's a legal failure that dollars of the record the embassy of the united states warns of attacks throughout kenya and on the geographical point i would just note that it's not a tax in just one place new crew is not far from nairobi that's in the testimony no