because that paragraph provides the simplest way resolving this deal if you have the record in front of you please turn to page one forty five of the joint appendix the first sentence or paragraph sure the relationship of the one in arbitration clauses to the other possible dispute record speed resolution mechanisms in here so the first sentence and paragraph c says that the certificate of insurance follows form two or that is incorporates all the terms and conditions of the property insurance policy that then takesh different yeah so that means that at this point reading the first sentence this certificate in fisher's certificate consists of both a certificate itself and the underlying property policy there's a problem however because the in for sure certificate now has four dispute provisions in it as part of it one from the property policy which says the disputes are to be litigated in the us court that section forty nine of the underlying property policy which you can find in joint appendix a page sixty three other dispute resolution provisions that incorporates what's in the certificate already which is paragraph using the new york was paragraph c c which is of the stage will cause the calls for litigation exclusively for its interest because i'm trying to show the relationship between the first sense and the second so let me move to second the question that the first why are all these what's the what's the result with all these dispute resolution patients are supposed to be part of is to figure out the second sentence answers that question by providing notwithstanding the provisions  that the certificate is subject to is governed by the london arbitration clauses and that's clauses with an ass plural it's not referring to something unitary it's referring to multiple clauses and i think there's no dispute here that the term london arbitration clauses refers to the text of endorsement number two the title of sorry not the title but the text so the second sentence tells the reader that you isn't what you just read part of the same form that contains which is not one of the causes of the regional attempt it's made hardest to get if you see the top of each of those pages of indorsement number to both pages say a certificate of faculty understand how would you rea with out the endorsement with the london under treatment clauses phrase be used to refer i don't know what of reference your honor i think that would be a troublesome interpretive point that's not presented in this case ok but in fact it i think arbitration on a paragraph c is to create a general rule that sets up the standard rule that london would be the place of arbitration which is quite reasonable for at least a couple of reasons first of all london is a place where there's a deep pool is agreed and and i'm trying to explain the contract sets of a general rule in which london arbitration applies say why not just i think well first of all i can only speculate because the record doesn't show how this was put together but if i had to speculate i would say that the draft so the the reader of this agreement and one would be expected any careful reinsurer to go through this agreement from start to finish would start with paragraph c at least in terms of the highlights for the thinking you did that it didn't need to cross it out because both paragraphs see and the fact that indorsements control over body text meant that it was unnecessary such that may please the court william adams for him for sure the district court correctly ruled that the general arbitration provisions in paragraph you govern the parties reinsurance in the parties reinsurance agreement govern the parties dispute here let me  petition to go back to their graph c and explain why that doesn't change the result here my friends on the other side didn't ignore the field text of the first sentence of paragraph c paragraph see the he says except as otherwise agreed then the liability liability falls form to the master to the master policy except as otherwise agrees brings in all of the certificate and brings in the endorsements because they've agreed to that to the base the first a person it's means everything but the fact that the reinsurance trumps before the the base policy and therefore you get to section the second sentence it's simply saying  only to the extent there's a conflict in endorsement number two doesn't address arbitrator fall vacations and therefore there's no language in there that could displace language in you for yours too according to it doesn't incorporate the title and that is status my argument it refers only to the london arbitration clauses it doesn't say indorsement number two it doesn't say the london arbitration clause says there's several other various paragraphs other titles and there is progress of this certificate so again that uses the word certificate which turns out to be key here the certificate inclu ncludes the endorsements so that automatically includes the paragraphs of the first minutes so you see in fisher's argument that you can't apply the titles cause the endorsement title fails that's exactly what the parents had to call in the title sponsor dresses the parents that are going the titles was brings in and the titles of endorsements to the time to the controlling to the to the scope of  it's whatever it is it's it's clearly within the scope of the title story and you know the case law in the circus or a strong titles it's there they're always in force that is to say titles even when they include that might appear to be instruction on instruction or direction so for example to solvers a city court case which is mentioned in front of six seems to have an instruction that the provision is pluggable only in the