MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
and done these commissioner for twenty five years and both of us were scratching our heads we've never seen anything like this go we follow decision because it was very clear the lessons was very clear on what to do and we did it so that brings us here were there to me dangerous because they had nothing to do with two point one days four and seventeen those words are reasons the mayor reports the reasons to the war for the germination and the they by a majority so i wasn't sure where the court was going with those types of terms and then when they use the analysis of section thirty five then they would offer this you can't in less it was a dispute about this it was clearly a court decision it's clear from our petition for consideration it's clear to me today that the specific sections apply if you'd like an explanation i can go through that because i think i have a clear view if you think for some reason commission this is strictly a political firing a political firing irrespective of the police commission the law that i called the statutes of section seventeen said section four there predated nine hundred seventy issues is whether he was eligible to retire at the time let's just assume for a bit that he was ok i know you disagree with that let's assume for a minute that he was eligible to retire under the statute what he was for or in again i don't disagree with this but he was removed you know after his fifty fifth birthday does he get a hearing before the board of the seventh of the a hearing before the commission other section seventeen of those circumstances if he was room charges there supported by the typical rank and file standards he's he's on the police force that's that's where i read his opinion as far as my nightgown i heard him getting into the issue of eligibility the way we're focusing on it today
projects that we put taxes off for a while would that be something the poor encourage development in your mind i can't speak so much tax issues really we're looking and see you don't always go up but sometimes you do sometimes we do just be because of the nature of the work and it's hard and i can't really speak to say what you know i think anything having to do with taxes whether it's here i'm not talking about  to mean the research i've done on this it's the courage development it's encouraged improvements to neighborhoods throughout the country where it's been tried pittsburgh being the leading example on so i'm just curious as to your experience what it w and you know i'd struggle when i look through these reports because i also see that we're certainly doing the legwork to get the word out there outcome and how do we look at what other municipalities do because when i look at the landscape of cities employees to me it doesn't actually asking of our city year and that is where we can make a dent actually and in the hiring in the city and hear me loud and clear and definitely see that we're putting effort in we're getting out there but do college is helpful what advertising helps and more which is getting out there putting it on the buses putting it in the radio doing our video presentation to make sure that everyone  is a great job here's what i do mean here's how i will do it and i think we'll see an incremental success there are a couple of minorities that were hired and female that were hired subsequently to that and i think this year get here next year we will be better success because this will be the third of last time that those young adults have heard the end of the the message that the city police's is sharing with everyone and so the decision for me to say for me to say i can say with all of this employee of the work twelve hours on this site yes it did but how many hours the december you were together for this company based on
directly relate to what happened in january twenty ninth two thousand and nine three years later the department proceeded to a teacher and that testimony they had elicited not only to cross examine her about it but to bring in extrinsic evidence of these other purported collateral bad get custody but as far as the actual basis that we don't have a transcript of those proceedings or anything here that directly states what the trial court's decision basis was but i think it's a it's a rational was the subject of an indicated finding by the department of children and family services that she had neglected that the various child whose custody was before the court but again we do not have evidence of what actually was introduced by  are considered injuries environment but by these press terms relegations sixty is not limited to those so maybe some more guidance but it still has the same vagueness concern as it ever did and the number of proceedings an fell within the statutory language they could probably get those individual nations as part of a different location but they haven't done so right now they're part of this environment injurious allegation and that's not from this hours or the rest  person s also indicated there should be no right to question the facts of that case and assume we have to do we have a juvenile court after determination in this case sure and i ask counsel do we have any can't and then they took it out i guess the difference here it's not that you're doing something they can't do they have done it for several years and for some reason you know i don't do how does it relate to the property here of the child in this case well but i think i think just you know not only not only that i think that you're just concerned with the child's age for a history about the mother's alcoholism and the investigator said that she took that into them was january twenty ninth two thousand i'm worried but yet somehow in the course of the hearing lots of other testimony i have found other police distance to the house and that being unfounded and were police officers initially you know it's the department's responsibility to prove that it was found a protest that hearing well she's walking in the door thinking they're going to talk about january twenty ninth two thousand nothing but all the sudden they're talking about something in other evidence from other pavey or some problems with the police or that kind of thing i think i think that the she should have expected that that would come into the hearing and she was represented by coun to two that were actually introduced were unfounded so why would she think that those are going to come off well off first of all you know where they were found and she doesn't know where they were unfounded no one i think we now know because the that was just something i had to do was a follow up i didn't consider there is no opportunity to cross examine i'm the only evidence against her this type of proceeding is improper
he saw the defendant's truck crossed over the bridge and when asked your emotions suppressed is that the base on the side of him crossing at bridge is that why you initiated a traffic stop or as that question was yes and he is and celebration however he developed those facts after he initiated the traffic stop and the traffic stopped and whether or not the stop was valid asked to be absent time that the stop the weight limit was forty six thousand pounds he observes the truck and his tractor trailer combination he had much experience as a truck and forced an officer so with his experience and his observations of the tractor trailer combination alone as he saw that he knew before even measuring the truck based on the tractor trailer combination that it was over fifty five feet in length he never saw that it was close to letting her father to over he never testified to that scales money individually put wheels up on the scales there was no printer there was no certified weights and what was admitted into evidence was the actual pleading or the complaint filed by the officer to initiate a traffic case i think there's a distinction a fully exhausted and i have no complaints about that i just think that you know based on the deputies testimony here that there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop and the fact
this meeting up the rules committee is ninety minutes like to
graduates of the class of two thousand sex parents and grandparents friends and relatives faculty members of the school committee and other special guests i'm pleased to present a school committee awarded routes to any achievement and exceptional person i take issue with not so much with the substance of his great but with his implicit in one is the message that you don't like the way society works you should disengage go live in the woods and read if you're intent on producing inspiring philosophy for posterity by all means use the roe strategy but it's worth noting that end segregation and i'm equal protection of the laws for people of color now not everyone is martin luther king but nearly everyone at some point is dissatisfied with the world after the attend harvard university in the fall the recipient of this award is roberts wait their dedication to their students and their dedication to their craft this is truly and thi the
yeah yeah i would like to take a moment to recognize mr landers and dr monroe both of the above and beyond the numerous extra hours making us the group that we are today they are both extremely talented and very patient and although they are losing boy and this is the quintessential first ranger arrangement of this piece so danny boy is a really lovely song about a mother waiting her son off to send him off to battle not knowing hoping that he is going to return but not your son plays violin and he's he's a pretty good violin player but he wants to play saxophone in band and you think you could give him some lessons and so is it sure and he showed them that within two lessons he just to go play the saxophone because i've been playing the violin since director most days and he is a really great sport about it and i'm very very very happy to give the most improved member award to mr toby  is the most valuable member award in this is actually voted by students in there you can imagine in the group was twenty three seniors who have all been together do you get a lot of votes for obama different people and that was certainly the case this year and this so there were a high number of those for many people this is the student who was far and away the leader and i can't agree more students mourning her most valuable they don't even know that the most valuable thing she did was here tonight we have done something rather historical this year in homs we have always in past years done little nickel and dime projects families and organizations that came together to wire these these important instruments and really have two more weeks left the campaign if you haven't had a chance to join us in this campaign i would encourage
from our my client is that prior to closing on the property he had the pin numbers of the persons that he intended to purchase he went to the assessor's office and you look at it man that showed him where those pin numbers were including this strip of land he testified that it was his own stand in his intention that when you close on the property he would be buying the strip and it makes sense because it's a twenty foot strip that gives him access to the northern portion of the rest of the property that it was gone so it was in he said the town and it was his intention that he would put a road in there eventually to get to the northern portion of the other properties that he was buying this was before the closing he said not only from the individual but also from the trustee that technically own land for this is a specific deed that gave him legal legally described correctly the legal description in the deed that he got it closed so there's no question that he has color and an end in the other item in good faith in a zone occupied land that's all it is for seven years of payment taxes the the record clearly shows that taxes on personal number of foot strip so that's the taxes that were assessed on this twenty one there's no question on this twenty foot strip that's the taxes that were being assessed on that person let me ask you this is what authority if you assertion place that you can acquire by good first possession but again title or the color of title stepping into the shoes of somebody else would previously asserting the rights of the property i don't have it he says the s interest in the property respect i have a very long term friend call him i don't think you can create a deed outside of chain title to invest yourself with color code sure seems like the county thought the title the something for the arsenal in question the taxes were paid because the pin number included in with the hocks other property yes
are just just to make a distinction here between some of our prior cases there's no claim that your client didn't see the arbitration agreement or that it was in small branch grinning like that in fact the record  don't let me just ask a question or make sure i understand what the record will reflect on this wasn't your client also given a choice he didn't have to be explicit scrammed correct he could have also did so in other s governed by virginia law with places tremendous importan which unfortunately about a week or two ago only supreme court reversed so it's probably not good at the ready for you anymore but multiple cases on arbitration clauses out of our court another say standard review
distinction well that's true that's why we cited united states versus castillo your honor on page eight hundred and fifteen of the united states versus very specifically will lead you out to west for the purpose of furthering count one and that is exactly what the indictment alleges and that's the jury instruction rigor coming in and testifying the defendant carried a gun when he went to drug deals d they testified that the defendant used the gun for protection by comparison take a look  for anything except collecting a drug not the furthering the possession with intent to distribute the fifteen point five six pry am's of methamphetamine seized from the b four allegation if we say that the only thing you need to convert the defendant who has a gun in any pickup truck  hey he carried a gun he admitted to us when we took the gun he had it for protection in this case they asked him and he said he was having problems with animals attacking is chickens or were going spawn animals and he had this done everybody sad as it was for one purpose on that day and that set that does not make it part of the conspiracy and it doesn't make it in conspiracy it basically d is irrelevant to the conspiracy seven except for the fact that it membership in my opinion i'd suggest without a question and the fact that none of these individuals ever take him meaning ritter because then clint would never say there is no indication that on any other time at any place but mr believable i'm sang but accepting it for what it is and the testimony that came in and the testimony the good not coming and from witnesses who were involved and particularly having writter who was the individual there is nothing to support a claim the bad gun was involved in anything relating to anything except and i'm except in this is a fat get the title to the trailer because read or goes there late at night the feeders cabs which he hasn't see firsts property yet have to look at this in the context sixty three cited by the government for the purposes of the argument save advanced and quote a person's possession of a firearm further is a drug distribution conspiracy crime when he uses it to fight another person into paying a debt or a previous drug transaction they took she talks about the items taken from the car one of the things she doesn't talk about being seized from the car and in the photographs that were introduced was accepted so i can't tell you off the top of my h where they are but one of the op a service whether it was a rare individual who starts with a j the title was in the car the title was present in that car she talks says that close in robinson the two cases the best support or argument but close case clearly says m possession of drugs and a firearm at the same time is insufficient to support a conviction but distinguishing factor from the argument i'm making and a close decision it was  up the firearm absent such the sale and exclusive expert testimony in regard to the gun being used for protection and i believe but i couldn't as they deserve it all stay well
actually two authorize the search of the interior of those presents he the search warrant the defendant sold jane doe poking immediately after leaving the residence and within seventy two hours of the issuance of the search warrant the defendant was still engaged in the delivery of cocaine about a category of criminal and it was sufficient to create a nexus in this case we have specific information about this defendant but he kept drugs at his residence on six occasions in the in the six months and then he sold drugs  immediately after leaving his residence i would argue that that's stronger evidence of a nexus than was present and found to be acceptable and people feel better but now in discussing the down allegation of a recent not if you use people vs speed as the authority that you rely on isn't there a case distinguishable there in the affidavit did contain language that the police had been in touch with the informant within this three days prior so that there was some time context there here we don't have any time context in this case the affiant was presently personally present in front of the issue magistrate the contact between the two of them wasn't three days ago it was commute difficult question but in this case there's significant other evidence as well including the sale within seventy two hours in the six other sightings of the defendant with cocaine package for sale or so to leon only applies to officers who police officers later in the leon case that one side line twenty three the court sets forth the so called exceptions to the exception these are the situations reasonable  would an officer manifest objective good faith in relying on a warrant based on an affidavit so lacking in the teacher probable cause as to render official belief in its ngs existence entirely on the reasonable that's the third prong of the good faith the magistrate should have been to turn into a if you don't want in the absence of a sufficient showing probable cause if the defendant's undock or the formulation only on his adopted the there are also larger issues of disagreement between the parties with respect to the standard of review but before i get to that i do want to address one other thing the defendant in this argument indicated that the scriptures there are in the the presence of the john doe personally means that for the reliability is not required but to the extent that it was in this case there are a number of control buys five felony convictions in the from this confidential  as well as a long history of working with these officers reasonable officer in a reasonable officer could believe that probable cause to search existed given the long history of sales from that residence an indication this is an ongoing course of conduct i would ask the court to find
is it is the corporation but the admin not wasn't present and brought forth or ahead schedule deliveries in the one time he had a police officer with them that were trying to he's bragging to the police officer the other guy when they're trying to deliver something or get in the work in the weight of the evidence pointing north the consistent testimony of four witnesses and points to the emission of certain language in letters references things that he beast should have happened that did not in letters from an attorney who was not called to against the way he read the judgment thing and look at all the circumstances i find that it was entered into under duress and without consideration what was the consideration in this document it's unclear t testimony that here did change actually did ever follow through and loan money here and if that is the thing here how come the action is brought by here which we're developing here within the bank and the action on a guarantee i mean we don't know the parties are here is likely the literal would be the bank and then the engineering team and the person who received the money i guess it was my clues crewman charges and when they were done but i mean you're thinking about a normal again he is a financial contractor i mean you're trying to guarantee that in your present land so you think that the actual consideration is prudence prior to getting the guarantee that the baby required just it makes no sense so under the circumstances i'm asking this court to farm that there was no
the issue here the contempt order that said issue is specific to the non payment countries nonpayment of the legal costs contemplated by the february two thousand and thirteen established what do they do if that so what was the contemptuous conda that the court found in regards to those orders the insurer presented us with every man for payment would just take that last argument in regards to a three or four a finding necessary in order for the forty orders to be capable of resulting in subjecting a party to a contempt on and on and i don't believe that the enforceability language contained in freo for a applies in this situation where we're talking about whether or not the that susceptible only one reasonable interpretation country has a reasonable interpretation that would be will require compliance here and there is this is a least a two step process that you have to  review the fees and made a determination of recent so there's another step that is out there it's reasonable to believe that with respect to the actual or another arrow that we have is that if you  or did she just make this statement then her for twenty first order humphrey nutro is responsible for costs of cooperate with regard to this case only without having benefit of any numbers so subsequent to the entry of that order i mean could you have sent a letter saying five hundred thousand a million and the failure to pay would have subjected the country to conduct well i think we all have to assume state and i don't want to belabor this but an order compelling a party to give a deposition you're saying that that order has to have a three up or a finding before it could subject the party from temper failing to know