nine that was it i am not ready i haven't seen them we have to also see judge that their beliefs day he asked the court for i feel ours to be able to see the videos the court that to meet the record that i understood from your brief that the record does not show whether counsel attempted to look at the tapes himself ahead of time  council would would have told the court what efforts made to look at those tapes for purposes of that motion but for purposes of ineffective assistance your point is simply we god will see whether he tried to or not he never saw them really second day of trial what happened was the court had heard rumors from the marshal if any who wanted to maybe plead guilty so he approached and had the defendant express whether he wanted plead guilty or not and this element of defense he would have gone to trial on that aspect anyway hundred ninety four c and also he stated his second comment was that he believed the police officers had planted seen some of the drugs so therefore then again we would have to go to trial and we can see was not accepting any responsibility for this offense so based on that and as for the police aspect that i think is a wash because of his statements and the opportunity that he was given to try to plead guilty on the second day or thirty of trial now with respect to the continued journals or to look at the timing of it this defense counsel i found at five forty on a friday when the court is no longer there and monday was a holiday and tuesday because the reason why you can see that is because when you look at it he was providing actually even something better than the videos he had the actually search warrants from from the security you have to look at it in this aspect yes counsel the way he was doing was wrong and so was the court i believe i've never really seen i've seen a couple incidents before but not like this but my  or against his client is that clear so he gave a strong instruction even at the end at the final jury charge he did that and so in this case i i think it was it was enough for them to overcome this due process violation because he did inform the jury not to take it then he also gave instructions you have to look at the evidence not what i did if you look at it in order to convict this person so no i mean i think in this case the examination in the way he handled the matters in in dealing with witnesses and so i would say no i would think and plus i could see where to show the president what happened in this case he was going to plead guilty it looks like that's where motions the press he had the opportunity and there was no showing you know that the evidence would have been suppressed because it was lack of standing because he was only contesting one of the three search warrants and still today there is no evidence regarding whether that friend had standing or not so and they're not contesting this on appeal so in this case i think did did you did you find anything in the trial transcript that would suggest that the judge came frustrated or short tempered with the prosecution at any point i i know you're not that i know from reading the record from you know i do not see  court allowed him in the first morning after the second day of trial to come in with i t person to look at the videos he said sure haven't come in hell out of the court to be open for the defendant and defense counsel to review the videos before the