that's given the order that was produced by the court asking the parties to address three specific cases i would start with those cases in order it's a wise choice i think your honor with and it is such a card security you're holding out you're holding up something is that part of the record it is not part of the record is that what was introduced in trial no that is not that's that's part of the problem i have with this case number one we don't have a good copy of what was given to the jury in the record in a week well i think mr ray he did provide that and it's a lousy copy to put it in the vernacular i can't even read part of it was it translated when i went to the jury it was translated on the stand it was translated and the things you point that i want to make between this a poet is the card that went to the jury isn't that card at all it's an advertisement for terrell kinds of business i can be this is exactly this is an advertisement and there's a little teeny picture up in the left hand corner it says spiritual counselor and then it gives a name i call me to get rid of failures break the chains xerox copies really can't read or see anything i don't know why people simply don't get was things that we can read and see especially when it's the center of the case i agree with you and i g s your honor and i think that was a problem wash and why didn't you put a clean white back tell your office give us things we can see and read and i will and part of the problem was that the piece of evidence it was government step in that was introduced at trial was not much better than the brief which i think is one of the most important parts of this argument was that without notice without qualifications on the stand as an expert paul came and said that does not even when it's an advertisement for a spiritual counselor he was referring specifically to governments number seven which was the reference to a spiritual counselor was he asked you to ever see variety of his two small very representation before on an ad for a terror card reader i don't think he was asked the exact question that the court has put to me now whether he'd seen you know this exact terra card the good luck charm hopefully to get through the border unfortunately government's number seven doesn't mention the name he smell very day anywhere on it it doesn't mention marijuana it doesn't mention smuggling in fact it mentions all the things that just try pointed out cures for impotence and everything else under the sun you got a bad love life come see me and we'll try to help you through our mystical magical powers nothing about any illegal activity felt we've had all kinds of cases that say if you're carrying a gun it means something if you have lots of money it means something those are all indicia of the crime charged circumstantial course but nonetheless with all those are certainly  well if i'm charged with murdering jews and i've got a nazi flag in my pocket was that me it means that you're probably predisposed to at least dislike jewish people but unlike that kind of a relative had no idea that mr louis did with you in coming combined with a secretive compartment in the suitcases that the agents later found the heroin in service was there why wasn't it harmless error given all the other drugs the drugs were in the fender of the car in a secret compartment a car that was not registered to him that you're not belong to him turned out that the registration that he obtained for the marquis from his friend our  new phone was fraudulent there was no evidence introduced that mr surviving taste knew that that registration for the car was fraudulent the only evidence was that he said he was coming to work that day that that's exactly what the agent testified to well this is an act this is an advertisement give you know what it sounds it's for general court yes absolutely of the balco you can you read it if you had a translator for you i could but i don't think i have because honestly i don't think it i mean anybody can carry it's not like a gun it's not even like large quantities of money you know i don't have most people carry large quantities of money anymore they have credit cards and so on and so you can you understanding the evidence introduced about the role of malverde in mexico in this case whatever other than the officer's testimony that drug smugglers sometimes carry early images i do not believe it was engaged in criminal activity because that would go to the weight of the evidence and not its admissibility you are going to get an affirmative defense to the notion that if you carry any kind of a symbol which is founded on drug smugglers you have to then you've made that into an affirmative defense that i'm not one of those persons who have it for the other purposes perhaps your honor but in this case it isn't that exactly what drug profiling is about in the only because you put on no evidence at all other than the conclusion of the opposite or that he from time to time that officers from time to time find that that image on drug you're making an affirmative defense out of something which is a profile i don't that is there was no evidence in this record that he personally anything about his personality in which on that point in issue not just objecting to the evidence itself that is expert authority about why that would be any more evidence of drug knowledge of drugs than a st christopher medal would be which would be found on numerous people and that's a good point and they have to go there's nothing that you put in by way of foundation wasn't there objection to his ability to testify as an expert on this out that he was twenty four years old still living with his grandmother and brother in a house in mexicali with no four and he only had two years of education they also brought up the fact that he had no social security card and that's why he had to and not a criminal case but the underlying facts deal with a very serious problem that seems to verify from the testimony of that case that persons are driving some vehicles without knowledge of the presence or conceal drug you know that other set of circumstances that therefore the knowing of its presence becomes critical particularly when he's not the owner of the vehicle and in terms of a in someone's back pocket has pretty much one meaning or images and or stories on a person's personal digital assistant of child pornography is also fairly unequivocal as to what that means maybe he's a researcher maybe he's a researcher in this case as you know he's working for n b c it's possible and perhaps he's an attorney i've been researching a case just such just like curtain but the point is and i think your honor properly pointed out that this was not a man who was looking to have relations with a forty two year old woman posing says look this is an unusual situation that's covered in beltran rios and beltran rio's eight seventy two fed second or whatever it was we said that this kind of evidence is admissible once the defendant puts an issue on the table just didn't exactly what was going on in his mind is perfectly appropriate