you i think we're getting a little bit of feedback on your maybe if you turn a was not a details that matter the crowd in fact what matters where it is that mr mcneill misstated what the medical evidence said which would have been pretty much the only evidence that robert the meat possible sexual abuse was actually investigated by mr mcneil himself and he concluded that jane doe was being asked leading questions which led her to make a letter to make vague statements that she made the only person she ever implicated to have those kinds of statements was her father saying that she was afraid of her dad and no one ever investigated him when she was questioned by counselor she said nobody asserting there was certainly nothing that was the only records that she made to mr matthews that he wasn't her body and they slept on a couch so there was nothing in the statements to teachers corroborated her statements that the child advocacy center  to the city so it was misleading to omit that critical fact and it turned out that the police chiefs were out the affidavits had a political vendetta against an opponent of him then a political race negligence this is not the but those two court was made on january th two thousand and twelve when the mayor's rd grade teacher called the department of health and human services child abuse hotline to report suspected sexual abuse the teacher reported that the minor had started pooping your after that both the department of health and human services and neal found that there was no reason to investigate further because there were no sexual aids behaviors present there are no disclosures of sexual abuse at that moment and so as matthew said no doubt in december record it because gene the two had moved away but the was not know if i earned but he was notified of that report due to his prior investigation at that lake he contacts the miners mother to talk about the disclosure here is what was not present that were his medical evidence and i think he missed to look at is is is representing this is just it's just wrong if you just wasn't accurate information that was provided to the judge and so on there's probable cause for the what so how do you address the sort of omission of factual information and the assertion that the information that was included even told but the minor ones but there were suspicions that the minor had been subjected to sexual abuse the pediatrician was not even in one so when she did her medical examination it was strictly it wouldn't exonerated matthews in any way because the report didn't look for signs of trauma related to sexual abuse because the pediatrician wasn't even told we're going to the affidavit itself  does make disclosures but a ten year old talking about something that happened when she was eight years old would not know unless it's not information that the ten year old should read or we have available it's disturbing  to argue my case with it and something that i actually couldn't or has already discussed is the results of the sexual assault nurse examination but those exams found and those signs of mental health problems so it would be it troubling indeed if we were to find that my heroes were not credible witnesses so their own sexual abuse because of mental health history let me ask you that is not in the record and apologize what did not make a knowingly false statement in the affidavit that is absolutely no evidence that although he testified that he could see how it would be misleading there was no evidence that he knew that it was misleading at the time it was it whatever the pediatrician was told he knew that this report said that that the findings of the rectum that she was had examined jane does rectum and found nothing of any sort or any other any slept on the couch there was not probable cause to believe that this was reliable statement and the medical examiner contradicted it thank you thank you this to look at thank you both counsel and you perceive it and you doing your best to