and ok and in this case mr grego were arguing that the administrative law judge did not properly address or explain probative evidence and opinions that contradicted his residual functional capacity findings this left unsupported residual functional capacity findings and just continue so administrative law judges can resolve conflicts but they must do it with public yeah i mean i mean that's interactions with the public but also all the opinions or evidence and the record shows that he has difficulty coworkers but the residual functional capacity doesn't include anything with supervisors any limitation the supervisors and that's not well explained and the  he didn't discuss so for example one of his v a treating doctor as dr bridges found that he had marketed lee elevated anxiety persistent distrust and humid his ability to feel pleasure social isolation and difficulty with other words and his persistent discomfort and anxiety make him prone to act out aggressively or appear to blow which for their inhibited his ability to form adaptive social relationships there's nothing about that that says well vocational expert when he testified he testified that if there were limitations with supervisors or being unable to accept criticism from supervisors then that may preclude alle days conclusions but also other evidence that he is interacting with others right he goes to the gym and was bowling and dozens of the things that are functional so i mean if your position that there isn't any evidence in the record that would allow somebody to conclude that he could have some interactions with coworkers and supervisors even if it's a limited one well i would say look i mean the fact that their group therapy and p t s therapy and things like that and he has difficulty coping mechanisms i guess so i mean there may be you know i haven't said he in the bowling but i don't know that that that shows that he can sustain a competitive position and he also has uncontrolled mood swings and what he was explaining to the judge and his testimony was that i can't control when i'm going to have an angry outburst  and so i would think that an angry outburst he's not going to distinguish well because i'm having a psychological episode right now i'm not going to have an outburst at my boss and and so i don't know capacity but she also found that she lacked coping skills he courted that partial weight and then whereas you know there's numerous other g f a's that are of forty five from his treating doctors that found he has clinically significant distress and impairment in social occupational and areas of functioning for at least six months which to me there's not you know i don't know how the l j was able to to to come up with that that it supported his are his are at sea the other thing is the most detailed  off a box that says he got the two performance from eleven to twenty percent of an eight hour workday and she says that it's very primitive because she's using the standard form that identifies a range and he would find it in total to greater weight if she'll aberrated him more i mean is that not an explanation for why he only a partial weight to that opinion but if you think that if you think that a true express their opinion in only a little way that was limited in its usefulness because it's the standard form with categories that explains to me at least why he's giving limited way to the opinion you know he he he he's concluding that everything she saying can can correspond to moderate limitations in the agency form and then he just you make these being i'm unable to to deal with others appropriately and that would include handling criticism from a supervisor she you know she she there's treatment of him and the record  so i read it as he just has a problem with the actual format because it's not it's not parsed out is mild moderate severe and and i would say hers is more detailed than the  agency forms that they use because mild isn't really defined but the signs that you know the surrounding evidence around the consult of examiner opinion show it was you know his tante had significant problems with social interactions with others again nobody distinguishes the the difference between supervisors for the public versus coworkers and the therapist even says that relaying self recorded symptoms and physical examination by regulation medical opinions are statements from acceptable medical sources that reflect judgments about the nature and severity of an errant what the claimant can still do and physical or mental restrictions converse lee this court has ruled on more than one occasion that clinical observations even those by treating sources are not medical opinions requiring greater scrutiny under the commissioner's rules on evaluating in your ability to maintain regular attendance and be punctual within customary tolerances during an eight hour workday i don't even know what that means and it appears that the counselor i'm not entirely sure any source if you know if a treating physician had limited him to you know let's say attention in congress that concentration would be precluded twenty percent of the day and that would be all but work important for the purposes of the substantial evidence review standard is whether the as it is in a sufficiently detailed to permit meaningful judicial review and we argue that the audit is one thank you very much that you know the sum of the factors can set or when you're a valuating opinions is evidence in support of the pen opinion consistency with the record as a whole now if you look at the understand directions and instructions so isn't that some evidence i know that maybe you object to the way the way the evidence but as long as there's something in the record that supports  record which we're arguing the record shows he's got more severe problems but the claimant testified to memory issues and expressing irritability when around a lot of people  is consistent with that right certainly the idea that he can follow instructions is consistent with the direction with the supervisor and i think your point that extended well i would say that i mean you know he this gentleman has you have flashbacks and that was noted by the trillo and you know i'm going by what his discover and anxiety it makes him prone to act out aggressively or appear irritable it inhibited his ability to form adaptive social relationships there's nothing that says you know he'll be able to click off his brain to function properly with the supervisors he's in you know the record before the consult of examiner shows he's persistently this draft and afterwards and he and this is a veteran who you know has multiple traumas  and his treating providers found you know he has complex and severe mood disorder with this ability and very rigid thinking i don't think he's going to be able to click off his rigid thinking for a supervisor  and so and that way it's not sufficiently explained how the judge came to the conclusions he d