sure concentration for he's concerned about whether she is going to be driving herself home he has any number of concerns about how she is functioning and her use of that medication extends for a period  well beyond one year and they never engage in any analysis of the impact of that medication going back that far and opposition at that was not a harmless  he found that the crime went down his examination was limited to a combination of sitting standing wanting to know more than four hours a day the l j when he disregarded that opinion gave no indication that her daily activities are inconsistent with the findings of the state agency examining physician threw them into her two a combined capacity to sit stand walk began which is a fairly new theory of defense's case based on the fact that she was not represented on page eight of our brief when we summarized in the findings of testimony we go through the a l j continue with the hearing as certain claimants do and the non adversarial hearing occasional can and will not have represented and in this case on page one hundred and forty one of the administrative record is the actual brit waiver of right to legal representation that an assignment signed after the hearing the l j kept the record open and after the hearing there were additional medical records that ms simons submitted for the  in his exams her musculoskeletal functioning and again the doctor wrong did not render any kind of key and indicating that miss simon had additional limitations opposing counsel goes back to to the r f c paragraph for page five of nine of the l j's order right in the middle of it as an exception to the performance of life work the l j says the claimant could perform live on that that's a that and i saw the reference at the bottom of thirty one as well but that's a your point is that that's a limitation on functional capacity occasional postural activities  is a term of art here you get into the record and you see that it's actually a limitation on what you can do the reason i'm asking is i was trying to figure out in response to mr satterfield argument that the r f c is deficient whether that language occasional postural activities incorporates sufficient limitations to address what seem to be pretty clear back you know such as balancing and stooping and kneeling with regard to the back impairments and that evidence there is more recent evidence as i discussed with regard to her  complicated examining physician dr andrew corpore in two thousand and fifteen when he examined the simons found that she could still lift up to twenty pounds and not place any additional kind of lifting and carrying limitations on the spine and the regulations define light work as the ability to lift up to twenty pounds and being set on page six with a decision that he was going to give that portion of the complicated examining physicians opinion some weight but as i said it's very notable that none of mr klein and own doctors rendered a disabling opinion or even any opinion that would have added additional limitations evidence to this are they finding there's even now before this court no showing of additional mental or physical limitations based on the evidence at the heart of this case is whether twelve all the way to be evidence with seed after the hearing and from that evidence be able jay assessed a light r p with additional physical and mental limitations and based on those at step five the findings despite all mental and physical problems could still perform a significant number of jobs only sit stand walk for a couple of four hours you can confuse ability to left and make that all inclusive that ok we're going to put blinders on in terms of the remaining remaining limitations that to run ourselves exclusively to objectify news although he made a number of findings that there were significant limitations in terms of her ability to squat her ability to the motion of her spine the case again i also think again that the if she has ongoing use of xanax at that level and it's in it's found to be where it is it is impairs her to the extent that they stated the doctor dr all kinds of arms that maybe she should be hospitalized to be taken off the medication that requires a o j to look at why she on this medication what kind of functional imitation switchy have given that she's had a for thirteen straight months that these matters are adequately addressed i think that there is a significant likelihood that there is harm by the hales not considering somebody being on the types of medications that she is on both for mental six milligrams as an x day late and for her pain including paying in court stimulator that in itself is causing her pain these are these are matters that need to be addressed and then i guess just again very quickly finally is that you did have the algeria's clear failure to give a full description of her actives a day a living there very consistent with her medications and with the treatment regimen that she was under thank you very much thank you this is on the case is taken under vis