has to move the country by itself where does it mean that it has to be at the end of the line of other for moving the guy to try to move the guy it doesn't say well it was for moving with god which suggests i mean if we just agree with you that member coming tempests no risk components if you think that member is just one saying that the word remember as used in this claim really ought to be understood as being equivalent to the word means without the baggage of one twelve six  this effect right well i'm saying is that would fall outside the scope of number can you give me an example of something that if you had a sort of elaborate sequence of we're importantly here with respect to this limitation least we are sort of in that position of trying to decide where it's the limit of member and we're at the beginning of nikken ism that's not a member so unless you're prepared to say and i think you've just said for retaining the guiding their charge position issue yes to deal with now let's assume for a moment with me i know you don't agree with this but let's assume that we interpret that to include two functions the release function the retaining function now what's your argument as to why the district court was wrong in her analysis of the non equivalence of structure for purposes of that he's plus function cla five of the read brief this is a bright ten that comes up in the middle of the green crank arm that's what i understand you to be saying is the is the equivalent structure their flexibility is essential because doesn't act like it like the thing with the ball you could push with and you are really well that you could push with all your might you never get that little tab up so the flex a good it seems to me has to be has to mean this kind of motion but it that's different from this kind of flexibility it seems to me which would be self defeating were if you had a very weak piece of plastic here that would simply been appointing a pressure time to address this seven ninety eight well i think why don't you give us a minute or two on the seven nine eight simply because it's a major part of the case we don't mean a lot of questions will go with allow the other side some extra time  disclosures to a sealed chamber of each which is is covered in both points nine and play me team we're seeking modification the principle argument is without loss or damage limitation this contain in all three limitations in question the starting point for the without loss report damage is it is it is in it is in it and so what definition dictionary definitions end in detach from the bottle under the course definition that is bad is not that's not attached because there's there's damage that cause since you're really just an example let me give you a counterexample take them apart if i would you call that those two components of the tire gauge detachable that you could break the gauge and detach the one point from the other well i'm assuming they're not designed to come off they're not the typical design from far as i know universal is they're not designed to come apart but you can take part if you're willing to put up with the consequences that you will the three would with the threads that are both on the prices well they're pointed to is seventy four and fifty six i guess of the two sets of threads  that whether something operates in substantially the same way and names out seems a very highly factual inquiry and in the summary judgment context it seems a little outside of the stem and stray should may have never done it that way but it nonetheless does have the effect of retaining the guide in the charge position as long as it's in place and then when it's taken another place releases it so why device that it still could possibly be infringing use but i have never come across any decision in this court that something that could potentially be dangerous should be considered as a infringement you simply because it's the only it's not working in unison whether it's multipart or not it's not working in unison it's a mechanism in practitioners even baron's own expert dr hit understood it was a mechanism he called