we have the state the state who contends the sentence is not excessive in the state who says the sentence is within the statutory limits in the state sites summers but summers is the distinguished of all from our case unlike summer the defendant here had a lack of wear a very limited criminal history the defendant played guilty to the offense he cooperated with the stories he spared his victim from testifying in trial not to mention the significant mitigation  limits it just isn't enough it disregards the unique aspects present and indecency in each case each set of facts just like a fingerprint a snowflake they all bear similarities to one another but no two are exactly the states that she's forgiven the defendant for his actions and that is why we're here asking this honorable court to refer first the defendant sentence in order reduction that sentence will this case is unique somewhat unique even though you see it all the time as a trial court judge which you catch actions going on in two different counties and what role did the sentence in champaign county play in terms of your position that this you indicate in your brief that you realize of course that the trial court doesn't necessarily have to go through and specifically address and the written order orally each statutory mitigating are aggravating yet it failed the state that non statutory bakker's specifically some of those mitigating factors like the defendant's rehabilitative potential the fact that he retrained from the type of conduct that brought rice to this it's the fact that he was to a low to taken into consideration when the judge talked about the defendant basically being a good person who's done a bad thing and i think it's well the judge may not have specifically said he had a horrible childhood can we not for compared to sentencing but to simply show that this is an extended term eligible type sent so the century maximum was sixty years and he only got fifteen after the reduction and because that very wide in the fact that he said system has a very it's kind of pretty close to the minimum of that by range not anywhere in this extended term territory the aggravation here does exceed the medication so it's not a situation where this could be considered she's too much for the seriousness of the crime it seems with the defendant saying that this violates the spirit and purpose the law but money major thing the defendant relies on is the forgiveness by by s b and that's not controlling it's just simply one factor the trial court has to consider another factor the child or can and should consider is turrets whether or not the victim of this offense forgives the defendant in this particular case these are still very very serious crimes it's reflected by this very high sad story maximum plastic's felony and the need to deter for these types of sentences to deter others whether or not those victims are going to forgive so that's why these things cannot be refused to be on the basis of the argument that well the victim forgave him and doesn't want to see him in prison that doesn't victim's young age is something can and should be considered also the frequency these events happen sometimes a nightly or a couple times per week and that extends even after the move to the point two thousand and nine so that's seven years  children similar second situations and others from adopting young children even from other countries as a way of i've providing access to young children for sex abuse so that's why there are many extensive aggravating factors and a fifteen year sentence cannot be in violation of stirps the law the fact that the defendant has been sentenced to thirty years consecutive in another jurisdiction that's something with truth in sentencing and eighty five percent another saying truth sensing limitation good conduct credit something the trial court was aware of it does seem this would make a practical effect of life term because forty five years at eighty five percent for forty seven year old tenants not likely to live that but this is a very serious crime this was a very long term course of offenses against one of the most won't vulnerable victims and that's just simply that would