that comes from the frame proper of the camera and then places stack frame into memory the concept of image resolution and quality relates only to the mode where the  user is doing the selecting when the selecting is done by the processor as is made clear as an alternative right from the abstract of the invention there's a software rypien boxer's a green one forty one fifty district court essentially struck the sentences of the alternate mode of using the processor to be the trigger for the selectively capturing south and so i would start with in the came into play and claim twenty two and so the first point that i'm addressing is the what we believe is an improper construction of claim wind which does not have an issue with images display correct and i believe that's actually where the district court went wrong your honor and and let me explain the regardless of the mode selected language refers not to the selectively capturing but it can't be because this is talking about until resolved images displayed the evening step occurs before there's a resolve image well in the game the result then that can appear as a result of the aiming but clearly i believe that sentence refers to any and the point i would i would like to address for the court of the look at the preceding sentence it draws the distinction right there if we may use or import a pressing a hockey again where where does the specifications say that that's your that's a lawyer argument as to what figure to show so where does the specification tell us that in the automatic mode that if it gets a blurred image and software of attempts to read that image it fails it goes to the capture image file and two seconds there is going to be another frame and that will simply continue honor i think that the flow diagram itself informs one of ordinary skill in this field as to what what is necessary to accomplish that doesn't set a figure to doesn't say anything about a blurred image or an hundred image right think it's very i think it's very apparent from the diagram that if it doesn't the code in your again that automatic timer mode you are going to continue to select those frames from the bo until you get one of the coding southwark and recognized and if you think about the practical application of this there could be many different forms of the decoding software in terms of what resolution it would require and so there has to be some way of even even of a user were to make the end point based upon its perceived quality of the image some way of dealing with an image that it apparatus for the target of interest and then the second thing you back here is until the result image is displayed in the monitor and then element two of claim one or step two crime one is continually displaying a real time image and it's not until you get the you can say well you still have to decide when when that time or spots because the specifications satisfy the neck and there was no dispute about this in the disk recorder what's critical is that you take a picture when there's a details about how it works because there are no but the lot so what the art art expert submitted that liberation with a reference to a technical article that did a review of eighteen different commercially available so we have various dictionary definitions at eighty five billion one which is the definition of just plain capturing and then six fifty six through six fifty nine and there are different dictionary definitions of capture card in video capture device the definition of a video capture card is an expansion board that converts analog video signals to digital for so if it doesn't do that it's not only the vice in the pattern that's associated with the function of capturing case closed and we believe case closed on that one would have thought you would say that if that is the function that under caps that's not something that's known by a general purpose computer that requires special programs we do so that is well in fact it cannot be it cannot be done by general purpose computer because look at i'd like to start with the capture of staff in the course reading of analog to digital into the into claim one analog to digital conversion appears only once in the patent beginning at the bottom of column for it relates to the continuously displaying stock not the selectively capturing stuff and the specification makes that very clear if if we go to  line sixty four the image of the target is then converted into analog electrical signals which are transmitted to the frame grabber having circuitry to perform the analog to digital conversion to providing a rate of pixels as defined by default parameters which is displayed as a continuous video signal for one twenty and if we go to figure two we can very clearly see that everything having to do with selective capture and loading into ram and decoding takes place after the analog to digital step is complete or in other words the frame is taken off of the continuous and states amazon's proposed construction for capturing quote converting the live analog video signal into a single digital frame is not the selected capturing in the claim imitation amazon is pointing to the wrong for a shop that has been our position all the way through it remains our position to date and it is the position that is consistent with the description and claim twenty two is a means plus function claim what do you conten is the corresponding structure there for the so they selected the image capture sure i would point to course first of all i believe this does fall in the exception of carriage because there is our structure for the capture me to state is the microprocessor and in our view executing the instruction from the eye there any user import or an automatic input as shown in figure one back and performs the analog to digital conversion again that is nowhere in the patent and the they make the assertion that it's a video capture card that does that maybe a video capture card that you buy off the shelf doesn't or doesn't do it but that's not how the patent describes the operation and  of based upon a condition and placing it into ram i think that gives the claim the correct hope it doesn't limit the claim to a user it accommodates for user or automatic input and it doesn't but the analog to digital in to claim one with respect to the processing means which was addressed before the court can look to the top of column for we disclose it general purpose microprocessor cats were that were the district court or the scuse me this panel reversed the district court's interpretation of seven claims very much parallel type of language in the claim general process and sent back to the district court for as you noted your honor further delineation of what processing means man the district court then properly interpreted that to be a general purpose computer now i'd like to also just briefly address the summary judgment after after the district court interpreted claim one is requiring user involvement in selecting the frame to be captured i then resolve the factual issues against age eighty eight if in finding that user involvement based upon looking at a displayed image was not sufficient to meet the claim language we believe there are three infringement look at look at the contentions that they cite in their brief this is this is the user action that rely on the user selectively captures the barcode by putting it within the measurement region of the camera and adjusting the image so that the barcode is