judge had i mean he was on video before him the judge can ask any question he wants had he well it wasn't my i wasn't representing him but his lawyer was present but the judge can choose either to take us money ask any questions or no so frankly i just had one two days ago where the judge actually asked certain questions of my client and this case of the not happen and  remember the standard is very low we just ask in the judge has to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility which is what are likely than not that grant of the actual application will be granted it's essential to note too that the asylum officer found legal to be credible immigration judge did not disturb that so whatever legal is true based on the precedence in this court and because there's nothing to dispute that he was not telling the truth or it was not credible so we all know what torture is i just want to go through some of the policeman beat him up stomping on his face with the goods and having the size of his bar and also in that city organized criminals tried to run him over and later beat his head and stomach with rifles beat him up anyway on the hand and the interesting point biljana is that when he ran away from this man the police was right there he tried to get their help they just ignored him this is why gal at two years old fell from very high and fell on his hat his girlfriend the mother of his children justified in one of the letter she wrote that he really his memory is very limited you could ask him to bring two things you bring just one to you so in that says i am in my view his testimony that he doesn't know and some of the answers really don't drive for the with the fact pretty extraordinary record there's some people who are still billions i'll say and look like they're members of the drug cartel but in terms of running it in the least in three different communities it's a pretty well established track record but he had a will that should he had had his problems because of his tattoos he said i think so but but then he was asked did anybody ever say anything about your tattoos and he said no so i think that whatever it is whether it's the tattoos and the one hundred x two so one would generalized evidence of violence in crime in mexico and he may have found himself in the wrong place at the wrong time several times and that that doesn't very have any bearing on whether or not it'll argument on your honor and i understand that she regards it as inquisitive and i'm not sure in mexico if this will be a coincidence or not and i'm not sure that it really bears on whether or not he homelessness and he didn't feel it wasn't as though he testified this is the situation i'm going to be and this is why i'm scared of courtroom the future instead when you say it's weird over there it's like a jungle and that if that discussion of that your present counsel's presentation so under the reg and the reasonable fear determination before the i j a he has to show a reasonable possibility of a future tortur have to parse through them incident by incident rather than trying to lump them together as all of these things together necessarily establish either past torture or the likelihood of future torture and the i j a made determinations that certain things just weren't police robbed him and then so i mean these are as that the i j a said these were random things that happen that don't would not necessarily need you to believe that in the future he's going to be mistaken for a robber or he's going to be falsely accused young something  call the police officer beat me take him to jail they tell him this is not a place for him threaten him to go away and then as judge person mentioned there's another incident where a random person comes in for no apparent reason except he happens to have a one hundred  pulled the trigger he calls to police to try to get help and they nor me so my problem is we have this series of episodes which you know very well counsel and i i'm sorry to take you through them but they are in three different locations why would we think anything different is going to ha and so my question is if you go straight to that point why would we assume that anything is going to change in the future what's your best answer to that question i think was yesterday that judges that i'm sure the law allows you to assume the same thing can talk about in conference but the problem is we're just mixing all of these different events together as one big event and they were it was big in says he was going to react because they thought he was a robber so does that mean in the future he's going to be tortured because he's going to be mistaken as somebody who's committed a crime he says he didn't when he was beaten because his friend falsely accused me of touching his girlfriend and not having to not proposal is the only thing that happen so there's a there's a pattern of the police doing this and i think different locations what makes us feel better is going to and the th location is going to be any different and remember when the actor is the police we don't care about it can be