overlook some of the provisions of the immigration and nationality act more specifically the court heavily relied on section eleven or one eight hundred three assuming that the definition of naturalization signified a nationality after birth through school naturalization alone and equated national with naturalized alien naturalized citizen however there are all methods and types of naturalization in the irony including if you're going to resign or some time from about only have about two minutes of a deadly weapon in arrest so happens that he is not a national the united states is this court has now held in and it also happens that his crime just remains a crime of violence and that limits this court's jurisdiction not it's sort of falls into through sectional question is there anything about the statutory sections on service in the army or other armed services that would nationality actually come the other way they further support dia in particular it was fourteen thirty nine and fourteen forty provide relax some of the requirements for the naturalization process for people who are in the military now what that ship what that shows is that congress believes not the people how terry automatically come country on service etc but both of those presuming that the person is already not a national or has not already naturalized in some way and the person intends to do that in the future and simply relax of some of the arms but not all of exclusive in a sense therefore mr ray's arguments can't carry the day in this in this particular circumstance now going on to the next argument which is whether or not he is convicted of a crime of violence this is held in a variety of cases that a crime of violence requires something requires in essence intends to flight from a police officer in willful and wanton disregard for safety now in that case the court said well here's somebody who has to do something more than mere their negligence or have no intent to ask for some modicum of intent substantial risk an officer trying to execute the laws of california approaching this person this person showing a knife in an obvious statement that that person won't go easy that's the substantial r now because of that under either sixteen a or sixteen b this is a crime of violence as a result this alien is removable under section three three seven eight to see and what follows from that is that now that having put aside the question of nationality and having put aside the question of whether the person is removable there is not no nothing more for the court to really decide their arguments raised in the brief that the decided the case of cone korea where decided that no that is not a violation of due process it's simply that the government's going to have to rely on the immigration judge's decision to carry whatever arguments it intends to bring to court so there is no violation of due process in that instance and with that i see that i've hit the two minute mark if there are no further questions i'll s in this case the court confronts a person who believes that he's a national but not a citizen of the united states by virtue of a declaration of intent to apply for citizenship and service in the u s army however that does not change the