he had taken the position that there was so deferential standard because their position is that this is a next question affecting all the cloak takes the position that it's too noble of you because this is simply a question of was an interpretation of few things however we do think at least it's called a chip on their interpretation of the station and we simply want to point out that this obviously from our perspective our client's perspective sudden change so obviously as you can see there's so which specific parcels within that graph the open space exemption to be and i'm going to refer your honor to the last three digits because the profits and numbers are the same it's zero zero three zero zero six  particular residential purpose on authority in this particular case then especially where you've got in the small dorm i don't believe so i will say that in the pleadings will alone i feel there was a passing reference that's litmus test if you will off for example in this is true on any pleasure non plussed public or private golf or she typically have a pretty large shelter areas either you know within the eighteen holes or some place you do for shelter from rain or lightning or whatever are we them to say that that wall is not functionally necessary to have people up and down the fairways or playing golf where would you draw the line yes my the back nine by one at what point does it begin to be a curse operation how large a banquet hall is part of a clubhouse for the function functionality of a coffee force how large can you whatever is the korean litmus test it says it is open space was not open spaces it's primarily used for residential development the general assembly is free to change things and they have for example  primarily property that is used primarily for residential purposes but that exclusion does not mean that all property not used for primarily for residential purposes is included it's only to make it clear they don't conserve landscape areas and moving on both how do you how do you operate a golf course without some of these things you do in the golf course without these that you do need those things but the legislature landscape areas such as private or public golf course they talk of it they say example of a golf course so what is a golf course you have a golf course with of parking left you have a golf course decision the board here somewhat arbitrary i mean i hear it's for golf course or it's not a golf course does it do we have three tiers of land there which is the night turn eighteen holes or twenty symbols whatever you have and the it some buffer far out of bounds and center or whatever so if that's really not sort of the golf course should that not be taxed at a higher rate and wasn't more somewhat arbitrary in what it decided to tax at a higher rate and the you're asking us to apply the or conserving the landscape derrius now just throwing that out you were saying in this golf course in scotland i mean why what's the criteria when does it concern and when does it not and that's what i'm looking for you to applied some criteria in determining that the maintenance building doesn't count but the clubhouse does count the tennis courts counts the pool count what was the criteria that was applied to make that determination