right to use government force without officer status as a police officer was not relevant to the issues before the jury at the time of the incident the officer was not acting in this capacity as a police officer status the officer was not  understand by way of instruction what if any responsibility or what his position was here or what he could do here in my fact not be the purpose of the instruction why i think that's actually what not the police sector officer acted rash and whether or not the causation chain was there they may still follow it up right the problem here is with that particular jury instruction allowing the jury to consider the status of off of point to considering the first see the building of this ongoing event their instruction is not a superseding impact on their instruction it's an instruction which was properly given because there was evidence to support i come on to me when i see the crime happening in front of me and then talked about how he reacted and whining he reacted in the way he did and all this relevant to show that he was a unlock the door he then call somebody unlock the back door and you see in the lower left quadrant another employee going to lock up and door and looked around at the defendant was on the floor so he didn't know who he said i never knew what happened to the defendant's gun until i went to the grand jury and he said i thrust him to see if he was still learning he wasn't armed and then he said call nine so they objected the defense object to love to that instruction but it wasn't raised as an issue on appeal so they forfeited anything having to do with an objection to that instruction well you know now to my question if you cast out one right the shooting was done the shooting was over when you started to give orders correct and according to you maybe it wasn't over yet but the shooting was over there were no there was no war pops going on but but there were two fellas three felons outside one was michael sago who apparently it was clear that he had he wasn't going anywhere he had either died or was so he was about to die but the two fleeing felons and he said i don't know if i hit anybody he didn't know if they were armed he did nothing and got in a vehicle or going somewhere else and so the event was not over until those people were apprehended he was afraid said i'm afraid they won't again weapons or more people here you know i mean look at the video it's a number of times and i try to write down the sequence of how fiesta this happened so when you first seen them on video to the time they entered the door six seconds  four seconds you see the shooting of the first two minutes thing started to flee fourteen seconds thirty four seconds then you see the two guys exit at thirty seven seconds when they get in there thirty one seconds and then you see him turning around and they see the victim going out it's a forty two seconds and then you see him walk in the front door fifty one seconds all of this took place in forty five seconds you know that he said i never knew when the gun was i just a were people is running me they were running he said i never saw anybody leaving the restaurant even when you look at the video you see can't you see they're scrambling for the door but that's not what he thought he was going because he turned around from being senate to be something totally unrelated to the entire incident they come into place and a pizza oven explodes and burns somebody and they die or they die from their wounds or the hot water heater explodes in the skull somebody is there a line of cases that illinois doesn't subscribe to that now is a police officer getting involved in a shooting like this and if there's a finding of justification it would not be a felony murder they gave to instructions that had absolutely nothing to do with the underlying charge and it was they were completely unrelated to the case all together i can't remember