regulation was also on bundles from the p s three so that only the p s customers who took that service pay that charge or france mischa charges move into the separate schedule the transmission rates get that some in cap two as opposed to count one that's where i think you think you are isn't it well i'll go there to go to that encounter to the problem is the parties didn't specify in the agreement if they were talking about the p f rates for the preference customers for the p s three for the exchange customers now late in the negotiations is negotiating to handle an answer yes it is he did not say anything about p f exchange customers or a p s exchange rate so bonneville actually confirmed the city interpretation  those two just as it was immaterial it didn't have any negative impact on the city's contract races they had other issues that they were discussing the party trying to make the contract work there was nothing to object to because there wasn't any overcharge so it's true that they did not object but the cities have a none when it's all this court has previously held in may of last year in the west that holdings in the united states case that even the acceptance of benefits in the millions of dollars hundreds of millions of dollars for development when there is a reservation of right does not waive the breach importance rights to contest the taxes as a result of the changes state law particularly and the proposition thirty four and how it was the change in state law occurring well into the contractor that triggered the need brace adjustment provision to do you want to say if you're a better time or is there anything else you want to tell us now i'll just wrap up by saying that for help on the all the all the petitioners really cared about was the p s number as it was written they didn't care if it added subtracted but that would suggest that there's no reason to bother with this ratio just let just let the v a make up a number of things the reason that the regime had any over time that the powers would become interested in potentially being able to to compare different aspects such as transmission from one potential supplier to another and so this this request and of the need from other people who are buying them that you who are subject to the p f a who actually are subject to a cost p p a to break these things out so that people can see what the different charges were it was not a dramatic thing that didn't have an effect on the what counsel said including both of those rigs the exchange in the preference benefited the cities at the detriment of b p s it made the city's rate actually lower including the exchange rate into the calculation and so there wer drafted the meaning of b p right the p f radio would have included all the bundle charges right you're the one who's had asking us to disregard what the contract meant and and to read now later the unbundled charges as being outside the contract so i think the contract required precisely all of the charges to be included in the p f a but that in the definition of all of when when the when you contract was drafted and indeed when it was implemented for several years it was always all of the rates transmission charges and all of these other things for bundled contract was drafted it was full load shaping load regulations transmission charges a dust judgments you didn't even see those in the brakes get in court and now what you want to do is say ah now later we can look at the rate schedule and lookee here we have a p f rate that does not have transmission charges in it we want to use this new rate schedule to interpret the contract that's later information that was not hundred ninety six rate schedule it very clearly sets up a great work for it now you have found that term used to mean something in the caught something different in the contract and you want to use that term and plug it into the old contract term but it's different term it's just a clear and unambiguous language in the contract and furthermore subsections thirty c of the contract says each party is going to be responsible for its own transmission costs in the contract so there really was