go he was here before but he's not here now are you here  i'll call the case again  good morning your honour's may please the court my name is casey howard from the from a block lord i appeared today on behalf of all of the apple is appearing today except for the i r s that's us bank us trustee for the trust of two thousand  second at best he's merely trying to relate a gate decisions a fact that were made by the bankruptcy court and by the district court as well third to the extent that he seeks the reversal of any of the lower decisions they're all protected under the rocker feldman doctrine because to make any reversal of any the lower court's decisions would necessarily require an up in being of two important decisions by the state court the first of those is the judgment of foreclosure and sale and the second is a decision denying m vacate that judgment and also to vacate the settlement agreement that mr nasa and in court with advice of counsel like to talk to us very briefly about those two judgments because i think that's the crux really of all the appeals the court's dealing with in this matter with respect to the foreclosure judgment as was found in that court as was affirmed effectively by a judge to rein in the judge keris my client the trust the same one that appears before you today perhaps a different trustee but the same trust hold the wedding note and they had standing now the most important thing i'd like to turn your attention to is a settlement agreement that was executed by mr nath in court with advice of counsel and site on the record for that is and this is from the seven thousand nine hundred twenty one appeal it's in the it's in the supplemental appendix page forty seven to fifty five it's crucial document simply because that document identifies as mr knapp conceding that he owes his d to the subject trust that he would pay it and most importantly that if he didn't he would waive all defenses including that of standing he did not pay that he'd been moved to vacate both the foreclosure judgment and that settlement agreement that was denied in that he raised every single material fraud allegation that are in so many papers that he submitted to the score both the foreclosure judgment and the decision on that motion to vacate has already decided everything before your honor's today judges keris and drain both recognize that they mainly made their decisions based on the record feldman i think that still appropriate here today to the extent that they made any decisions with respect to findings of fact those those those were made without error and while most now certainly wants when he doesn't identify any errors in those findings of fact as as a final point i would raise that the remainder attacks that are in his papers as with the thousands of pages he submitted to six different courts at this point involve personal attacks on me my partners and my firm my client most recently in a sanctions motions to your honor he was seeking sanctions against the state court judge that granted the foreclosure judgment against him it's been seventeen years through six courts he's had five counsel or more representing him throughout this process as judge harris recognized and i would ask