he's under the influence of drugs standing on the corner didn't make of the accident any more likely to happen and in this case you have the guy's back towards the truck and nobody thought that he was going to continue rolling backward and in fact striking the truck and mr williams saw goes so far so jump out of the way to avoid being hit by the truck all of which says that the drugs really didn't have anything to do with it now and you know i have to say that if the drugs went to perhaps his his his his ability to earn a living in the long term or his his this is a life expectancy i mean that could be one thing but that's not what was offered and wasn't i relationships between lindsay and seen as shall miss carmichael shirt when she goes to carmichael there's nothing that says that that scene goes there carmichael but you're trying to connect all three even although there's a connection between lindsay  this concept in work or let's say he was a what's the term borrowed employer loaned employee let's say he was alone deployed to carmichael and and to the extent that he was alone deployed to carmichael there is no relationship between doing something let me ask you regarding that when when they say a member of the public is a member of the public anyone other than an employee of the trucking company so that an employee can be a member of the  were these were where were the were people just like there is no nothing stated there and there's no indication the record has been presented that the paternity act which is very specific in terms of what you need to what needs to be complied with and think of it the plaintiff is doing going to work her out there was some argument regarding preemption and the question is do we have to reach that i don't know that you do but i think the supreme court already  instruction proposed that those those matters that dealt with that license for instance went to credibility training skill knowledge and things of that age the i believe it was the defendant's instructions they were actually given with respect to the political standard care none of this was ever argued next context that was simply not a period of time yes to the question of preventi expert testimony from history activists about measures that could have been taken that would have avoided disaster it was never given to connection with the destruction or was never used in any instruction and again it was there was a great deal of testimony presented by the plaintiff as to mr taylor's functioning throughout the course of that day appropriately and without any problems there was a letter to dr riyadh and it's on the top i guess what they're arguing is that they were somehow prejudiced by not being able to use the word heroin instead of morphine i frankly don't know what the impact that would have been or how that's error and also raise the issue that think you have three witnesses stand and no she is not the administrator but she's the mother of all the kids that they represent and she said well no one told me i had to bring it she's over there office and she said she says i am that very well may have had evidence as well because of this issue finally with regard to the preemption issue