both entirely contemplate this kind of a project necessarily it wasn't drafted with this in mind what makes the first impression is that it's a merchant transmission route and this is the first such project in illinois  meet all the other requirements well it's like a work in progress of them i think the commission did indeed assume that in the course of exercising it again i think a good example of why we're all cured this case is certainly unusual bordering on unpleasant and the fact is i think that my client the commission will ultimately be charged with ensuring that if you were to ask me today which you are not i would suggest to complicated and substantial projects within a two year period but i think it again i am speculating and not speaking for the commission or any commission i would expect if the  financing issue and you agree there's a lot more than financing when you say are they making progress i would certainly agree with that so is your response hypothetically that case and this is a good example of another aspect of it's unusual but not certain of the order speaks to either of your questions other than that and again i can't stand here today and tell you what the commission will hypothetically do in if the issue is ever squarely and i don't know but it's it's obviously it's sufficient for the for the structure of that happy they'll have the money exercise  within these two years and so you know your operation of the statute your certificate is always so my client is focused that it will need to engage in more activities frankly th into the construction of the project but the customers of the transmission line will be either generally plants in iowa who want to move their power to illinois so it can be sold with customers or certificate we are really authorized to build the project that we presented to the commission and that includes a very specific route there is a detailed description so you know we don't have a forty under this certificate order you know transmission you know it's impossible you had people you know yes because the specific technology which is the the optimum technology for this particular use which is to move our five hundred miles just this entire project can't function physically unless we have the we build a converter station at the end of it at the point where we're going to deliberate into the into the existing  there two to serve customers in illinois customers in other states that's that's the that's that's the decision of the buyers of the power you know as to whether they are ultimately going to deliver  company demonstrating that you know it's it's done something this more frequently frankly has come up in my experience in telecom cases where and it's the competitive telecom providers that basically don't own actually was we had to get a certificate to be as a public utility before we could apply to actually bills can't be a public utility unless you're going to kill some so you know they said our filing should be withdrawn or dismissed until such time that we were willing to come back we would come back with an actual proposal pro if not explicitly is telling you that you don't have to be ready to start providing your service the day after you get shit or you have some period of time you have you have two years to exercise that for  but there's no automatic procedure in the statute or or anything misused sadness that says you need to look here utility at the end of two years and demonstrate refrain from doing something or demonstrate that it's meeting some standard for example it's a frequent he says he should inverter cases that the commission says you have  financing has been taking are now all and that's i mean this and see that i think the focus of the condition is in the commission that the the evidence me that's i think that was actually a brilliant regulatory solution so the issues raised about the ability to find and and from sherm's that will gee what if they started building it and they didn't finish it you know equity agreements from the various investors in mind there's follow that with the commission strudels parton's yes the staff will review it but any other party is also and would be entitled to follow our complaint with the commission deficiency the staff follows a report with commission asked the commission to initiate a formal she would best be gate whether the condition has been complied with were violated and there's many commission proceedings that start that way based on acquire the land and if and ask for it to may first and then present to the commission whether your project is needed at appropriate transmission and you think that something well it's just  in my experience the mean let me look at it this way what why why should you be before the commission arguing about getting any made on someone's property when the commission has even ruled that you have a project that meets t criteria under you know under our statute for being a big booty so you know i don't represent rock island in the aisle seats but it's my understanding they've spent a considerable amount of time with the commission trying to come up with