other sentences on the basis of the record before this court i do not conclude the respondent has been the subject of press persecution were as a well founded fear of persecution on account of any of the in mexico and you look at the end of the security forces and how they behave towards people who brings human rights and it is first of all the human rights the only piece that's missing from actually having heard torture her say under the definition already is that she was not in the custody of the government when that happened governments and to the exercise and limits of governmental power and that's what we're really talking about what can the government do to you i can the government can the government torture you and the government arrest you arbitrarily other things wrong and the government case in colombia and prosecutor who was involved in a politically charged matter investigating an opposition political party she's dipping into the same kind of thing that's going on here where it's at least in part of  that she was not only was she bringing the suit but she was making a stink about it she was really pushing that something something was up with her you would think and all the other attorneys in towns what are you doing this is crazy you can't  question is well was there past persecution and then if we say well you're wrong on that then it's going to back again to see whether the guest persecution which creates a a well founded  case can be reviewed once and not go on for three years six years years nine i suppose it would need to be legislatively done i don't think there's anything that exists in the regulations right now that requires an immigration judge to determine know it's very easy to say accordingly h member of the conservative political party and he was charged to go against the liberal party now it was a clear case where it was one party going against the other party and that's the case with a court that it was all intertwined in crown of the court didn't actually describe you on account of issues they started to look to a square zero in terms of talking about the whistleblower case but the statement that they made was a silly question is whether the iranians actions were directed toward a governing institution or only against individuals who persecuted on account of political opinion and ethnicity that's not what we have here all that we have here is anonymous call saying drop the case the motivation is clear they want to be only to drop the case there's nothing more in the record in the  prove in order to prove that you've been persecuted on account of political opinion which is what the judge found did not happen and you have to first prove that you've been a victim of persecution and then that you hold a political opinion the person political opinion is know you got approved to show persecution on account of political opinion so if you following that case than i i actually did my own bifurcation when i argued the case because it was just easier to organize and i like that song out when i  and interesting point that i wanted to bring out too and there's some discussion i think in the in the silent prank that was put out by our government saying well consider whether people can relocate in