MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
to provide some standards for waiting and the five thousand dollars must be reasonably connected to the cost of processing the things but charging you for police number of people that are going to be attending emergency thursdays those types of specific types of rules and health safety regulations that the applicant has to show compliance with and the permit application is only tr day where you could have less than twenty four consecutive twenty four hours and you would be able to engage in your activity without having to go through the permit process as the district court cases on i believe that  demonstrated i believe in standards and guidelines and i think that that statute is required or in case law requires the county to say that it's worth exactly you know we're going to charge ten cents per copy of the application per page and we're going to charge twenty five dollars f because i'm not sure exactly what goes into assessing the application i don't want to put forth exactly what it would be that the county would use as the basis for determining what its costs were in assessing the application and i'm not sure it could be that you know it of first amendment issue there isn't going to be a cause problem with that type it as scheme and that's the same here we have a content neutral time place and manner regulation and the fact that we can but we do have a danger with a ma application fees i would imagine in foresight to have that sort of i'm proud of discretion on the license or to say i like these people i'm going to rule on their application within twenty days and only charging three hundred dollars i don't like these people are go
him he was carrying a package for the first time he didn't have one and this is that should be very informative for one or the other or both of us i can't understand it holmes answer to this the man who punched me i'm positive but also the one who had a heart attack when the same of natural causes that is no mystery at all no anything wrong i think and psychology and the night watchman saw him leave at nine and you were spoke to him a few minutes before nine welcomes why don't you and dr watson go home and have a good night's rest from now on it's nothing but plain ordinary simple police
other party is that the yeah the sayings are basically saying she was a nuisance and acted in a way that basically took made this project more expensive and longer of any hears to complete the rebuilding of the whole i'm having a hard time finding finding why that doesn't fit into the exclusion bunder  physically intruding into that person's person long runs of what's happened vandalizing property so well that as i understood the argument it was that she simply entered at odd hours of the day and night and that somehow this was not contemplated by the order but again so that neither side gave us the of the term there  about it's about the umbrella policy but it actually links back to the homeowners policy there's someone was in the homeowners policy which i'm just trying to understand all direct you to your excerpts of records
detections because they are available because our international treaties that the united states has with impunity so this may be a simplistic view of this but in this that he didn't understand what was needed to be done and then you look at he comes back the facts are fairly clear as to the danger to him if he's removed again and so we have these asylum treaties to say that we have some obligation to take a look at reality in deciding these cases and you look at our statute why why should that first  describing differences between these things fully understand is why is that description relevant to how the former construe the word believe i just don't i don't see what the government's  difficulty with looking at it and saying that it's bigger was our argument as it is a big was on its face because of because of what it says they found that it was it was not necessarily on a pig it was on its face when he went is well can you explain to me what position this man currently as the petitioner he's here he can be sent back at the present time but he has no rights be removed to another country yes he can so or it anytime if this situation allegedly changes its own country give me sent back there that's correct or so for all practical purposes what you're saying is the statute because of the prior remove all means that even though the facts may say he's entitled to asylum he's in perpetual limbo that's position makes no sense we recognize that this person is apparently under real threat if we send him back but because of his regional removeable now he's back here again illegally i grant that but the facts seem to be clearly clear that sending him back will endanger his life pretty clearly and so he's here in limbo he can't work he can probably get any benefits of any kind they understand that but is that what congress actually meant to do or does the the inside statute mean something s this halfway thing where you get these protections but then you're confident congress would've intended for you to be that they then get a further protection i don't know what's the logic i'm not saying there can't be any but i'm just not hearing
refer to the testimony of this to puro and i note that in his declaration he likewise mentions great that that's not what he said what he said and way to record his testimony to there's a reason for that what we're trying to do with this is he's is to preserve the space between the particles so that samples can talk through there and how correct if the artist were pressed for collapse due to enjoy the benefits of this physical technique that's the crux of the issue now we have here is waters knowing that they can use their parts in the  they were continuing to sell their product only the only we did a draft was the definition of rich and when you look at what they did when you look at the opinion that was that
business with i know but deep down i mean real business and money that gives me an idea you know i've been thinking that i might be able to swing that deal a boy if you mean i mean that mr reynolds is a very good friend of mine and if he thought i was buying that ship for myself might make a difference sit down this stock this thing over are you sure you can do this for me well i don't guarantee anything  suppose i should deliver those blue prints to what would it be worth five thousand dollars at least not one penny less agreed and suppose i found myself in a position to deliver that ship to you first what would that be worth i don't know five thousand dollars agreed my friend so he did that he's a bad man to deal with just the mug just to know that he happens to be a very influential then around here and it might cost you a job in that case i'll come work for you here you were talking to the other day about when you behave come on come on give me a lift oh and by the way don't forget to bring that money i come right over right  somebody following u my friend you got this thing all wrong it's just a little slip boys got there and then we expect they got everything you wanted and here are those plans the meaning of the nothing and talk just a little misunderstanding oh here's your plane i think we'd better go down and take a look at that ship very good idea ah
this isn't a rapper robbery it's murder and all you can tell me that right along with you can't put it on me i didn't do it i didn't even have a gun that's what you say we know different don't you well we got the statement from that messenger saying that he saw him  arrangements for the getaway where they go you know what it's like to take that walk down the long corridor to the small door that leads to the finish in greater danger here than anywhere else there's a crowd here out to get you and well thought of nothing not your town situated on the border did only in towns along the border that one is out to find individuals who have articles offering for sale that may not be offered in other localities in what way wait outside thank you you someday i may be able to return a favor say mister do you think it wise to open a place of business here with the police after you and what do you know of my business oh it's all right with me but i happen to know th how to do what can i do for you i like to see you speak very good english i will to see i was born in china but educated in san francisco you are thinking perhaps of the dialect which was really funny to you by the  chinese who came to this country but most of that has gone out with education even in china but all of that has been changed since the chinese at the time the chinese  this is a very clear jim exceptional quality but would require additional cutting to make it marketable at the present time you are interested in trying why yes but why should you have a personal thing enshrined we chinese worship not only our ancestors but also on a and regret the passing of captain past i have also rejoice in it because it leaves me free to conduct my business i will give you two thousand dollars for those tomes but they work a great deal  to show great wisdom you raise a hundred thousand dollars the great amount of money it would require twenty four hours notice for me to have that amount in american currency my friend the beach at the border i by the way do you mind if i bring the young lady from whom you bought the other two diamond certainly not i should deem it an honor to meet the young lady again when it's a deal day after to morrow at sunrise  friend you occidentals you jump to conclusions very rapidly to rapidly sometimes you say it is it do you like that it is only a deal after i have thoroughly examined the gym or naturally naturally you'll
the issue in this case is very simple there is one factor in this case that supports the idea of this case being insane for county illinois and that is the fact that the doctor happens  medical treatment all in missouri all  access to sources of testimonial documentary and real al an the testimony of dr mark the records are in the hospital in st generally the the nurses the doctors the doctors and in jefferson county missouri where subsequent treatment occurred the records and doctors in st louis county missouri where the subject of treatment for all these every time we have one to do something here we would have to hold a miscellaneous certainly the interest of missouri is far superior because you do your talking about the interest not only of the medical treatment rendered in the surgery but rendered in missouri to missouri citizens we have a combination of the remember that the plaintiffs live in st louis county as well so while certainly you goods you could argue that there is no interest and there's an interest in every state to have doctors were conservative supreme court jurists that it is virtually impossible for a defendant to argue that it is inconvenient  income taxes i will her properly dislocated so that if there is a judgment over her policy of sure that property will be subject to the jurisdiction of the court we don't hear of it history we have it in the jurisdiction
all of that successfully completed the next four m that question
good evening everyone and welcome to our two thousand and fifteen west woodwinds annual concert we're so pleased to be here tonight it was so great to see such a big audience to see evening if you and those of you who've been following us we try to stay outdoors as much as we can last year we were stuck in the cafeteria it was just so pleased that we're open again and i think outside of the auditorium this space is probably has the best  terrific in this place from being an outdoor venue it's just great we have a very program for you we're going to start with something that's called our america so medley of patriotic songs i usually make some comments in between my wife tells me to keep it short and i'll try to keep it short too because we are one week later than we normally do a week normally give a concert the first monday and we've been watching the sun the sun goes down around seven thirty so we got to get this thing won over americans in the english were fighting against the french and we had no uniforms but the english of course had those beautiful uniforms with the press buttons and the happening and saw they were making fun of the us because we didn't have that during those years and so the seven hundred sixty s it back in england it was a fashion for men to wear these big wigs that they called macaroni weeks because of some kind of curls on and they would put a feather in them some research and i do remember a little bit about american soldiers being captured by the japanese they were prisoners of war and they were forced to do work to build a bridge they could transport fighting forces and bridges built we blew it up everyone laughed it was a happy and much of the rest of the thank you thank you ben thank you take five you're going to he'll hear mike's play the solo on that take five was dave brubeck song and paul desmond was the famous saxophone player back in the piece is something that it's a step away from what you normally would hear from a concert band we're going to play a little funk brick house by the commodores coming to us i don't remember much about them you know we're all west lights here i mean we're going to have to interpret something of this to stretch for us to get to this point ok but anyways we have to get into that and going to get down with this all right something unique something different and it's still something that we can enjoy today good
yeah well how do you like that i like that ruined by well you didn't do that one any good buddy boy i want to shut up and mind your own business oh yeah separate two way to  no matter what your guy you'll have to admit that you good right but that's where it belongs you know where it belongs yeah i know where it belongs get out of you want some ice cream oh boy his moment to irritate you and you get out of the boat boy if you're out here how could you be in right all right hello not that way through lack of brains have no mechanical aptitude whatsoever i don't understand seller i never had an uncle that it's stuck can't to do anything
evidence to say that the jury was necessarily wrong i mean there were he had two names at one point three dates of birth of several areas of residen determination here and at least three of the claims that he made were after he admitted that he had come here illegally and then subsequently submitted claim that there were persecution of sikhs in india and it's tough to make that claim now in light of the country reports of another report that was put in the record a whole sort of fact that the approach of the prime minister is  security i mean fifty six questions some of them are but if you take a look for example on the topics two fourteen which is take one thirty of the transcript says mr singh no why did you receive a letter thousand and eight so it's early answer yes so it's only dated less than a week ago do you remember it so you can just see the sarcasm dripping off the page and that's just two of the questions we said with regard to i don't think that she  at the temple so there was a complete development as a result of the questions asked here it's really hard to say that this particular o j although taking an active role but it doesn't mean that we grant a petition for review good has to be beyond that it was i said before to missing that there's a reason here and how
there may be col did i suppose it is possible that there could be but the point is that this device here is a slightly recessed area that's not close to the
previous year so based on response mother's testimony it can be shown that the the respondent mother had not had any additional problems or major problems birth in the period so  objected to the c f s retaining guardianship she was ok with that she simply wanted the custody of the daughter and said the alternative well can i at least have unsupervised visitation if the father since this is o basis for finding her on able to care for her child i mean she actually stated for an education for a petition at work she agreed that she refer recall receiving a phone call nov twenty second this is one of her daughters from a very scary and that's why the minor involved in this case saying that she couldn't get her mom to wake up and get her so ricky went over to the house so our mom  so this was really close to the time of the trial court made its ruling they testified the incidents into sure reported that this august visit response arrived at her house and as soon as she got out of the door of her car she knew something was wrong she could barely
but more i bet you my life i never before seen people eat so much when i saw to my horse all right i know what they're saying i still reckon you're the boss boys have to tell about it  you talking about you know very well we have no further use for you on this ranch go back to wayland he'll give you a job here and it will be a job that you wish i didn't have we don't want any more bloodshed i know you want some children don't want your problem and we have to fight for our rights the way we still have lost we can't touch weight and that way we'll never find out if we don't try you want to fight you've got one and we've just begun and i think we're going to like it i'm afraid the men want to open warfare but we can't we don't want any more bloodshed any more deaths come in me one more chance a day or two days to find a solution that doesn't mean shooting and killing you mean if you expect to do this for a day or two ships there's nothing to lose and i'm sure she'll get on some plan and i'm too tired  what do you think about the fact maybe you're getting under mr whirling skin and maybe you will soon find out what's really on his mind so we can start taking it out on  hills to pay for the refund you can't be sure in this case again i
it and then there was there was a problem whatever the problem was that you didn't show up on a different day that the court thought that he should have been there and then is give your explanation now what i think the board should do is say this is not a criminal proceeding first if if they want to bring in other proceedings in direct removal and i think that's a different case i think those are that's not unusual and let's say let's say the judge wore on and gave you the opportunity to explain why you weren't there to the week before whatever the last  you showed up there what he thought was going to happen and you said what you were going to have to show cause why you didn't hear the last hearing so presumably you knew the nature of the of the complaint your charge your allegation against you that that would we would have to we would have to actually go charging document and give it to you but by doing the right to have an attorney and present witnesses who are alive you know i had an excuse
how long between that three years and that for a life yes serves yes so the president has no discretion ordering the right or you just say three to naturalize and but then the department corrections actually does have some
are our position is that they never
cases like in dixon other cases in every even seen some of the dissenting opinions recently they're saying let's look at the least let's not just hold this is a bright line test and i think in this lease there are there would be three provisions that would excuse me in that paragraph four of them appear provision there are both sides of the coin and i think that they're somewhat contradictory because it is what it is with one part of that provision obviously as with so i consider issue of the think a policy provision behind it i think there was a perspective behind to protect a lot of these residential tenants there's probably some uninsured perspective all of this plays into the fact that all of these cases that even th language of the sleaze to make a decision as well you know it's not just the distinction between the the residential commercial which i think is a very good question and as  building's owner would could procure fire insurance and that tended to less or would not do anything to increase the look at this this lady's it's pretty clear that the intent was we were not irresponsible intended would not be responsible for fire loss i don't think you can have any other interpretation and paragraph four so i think that's that's pretty clear and that's and  over again it does their district in the outer owners recent case also found same sound in the second district decisions that you do achieve the status of a culture and there's no distinction made between commercial and residential and i think it is in the premises the answer would be i don't know but i assume your your question is do they have liability insurance for the for fire damage and i think that that was the answer that you got which was yes it was
terribly funny if eric pierce does something else but read the news and that's what he's going to do so i think this will be a fun and if it isn't funny well then it's just going to be chaotic but kennedy is actually great in about oh fifty or sixty years time and he's left television and you know i reside in and i'll bend on that you can imagine that this is an old man time and i just about is i and it was very handsome an what we might have a whole lot more of us but it's a pity it was such a great film up against this and i think someone might have missed the only part of the fun we've been having tonight i think has been one of the funniest shows i've ever they didn't really because it's it's i made everybody's doing something  normally do and it's fun as least it's funny to hear i hope it's coming out that way of time i've got a dish of ice cream and i can see that i can say it's a certain brand of ice cream in the big question is to put the claim in ice cream you've got to have twenty seven on your on your ticket to participate in february
opportunity to fire the possibility of a violation as this court helped you don't think there an inference of bias into the alleged facts you know he has a sexual relationship with his girlfriend when he's in jail now he's serving speculation
premiums based on the risk that they're willing to accept in this case mr i happen to have you liability limits meaning if she were involved in an accident and harm someone out the maximum amount that person would be able to recover and her polic here is ignoring the introductory language and the other insurance policy where not ignore the introductory language in any other insurance policy in fact we're asking the court to read this entire policy as opposed to picking and shale the excess over any collectible insurance providing such coverage on a primary basis for twenty to twenty seasons in the state of missouri this issue has been raised kind of time again there's nothing magical about the state of missouri it could be any other state could be any other jurisdiction if it was illinois that handed down the dollars it was not so she did not need under insured motorists coverage because she was involved in an accident with an under insured motor and so here unlike the life that keith is including ones by this court where there were reasons why
able to prove that to anybody he he didn't find the project he said there's no project right so i understand that there's a diagram and it made him look like that from various angles but it's kind of hard to thing i didn't hear you referenced in your time of this is the flag which was part of his and he looked at it and he said the right point has no projection there's only a receptive and you're saying that's but the problem the problem is that you every time you're trying to make a point here you do so by walking away from what the patent says this the patent clearly says that these projections twenty eight with respect that the