of guns be relevant generally to he is interaction with this person and the freighter beyond the acts that were identified just or generally that he had access to guns and there is time where the victim of machining or murder a murder victim or someone who's been shot and there would be something relevancy you could say at some point in time this person had a gun but that's fired them what we know is that he said i inherited some from my father at some point against him we don't know when we don't know when they were when they were president but they did connect him in a sense to that what if what i fact is it's the same you're going to put in gun testimony or evidence or the physical going to doesn't matter you have to connect the gun to the crime it has to be done better than it was done here but speaking of painting the defendant not necessarily as a gun but i think it's pretty obvious that the defense pointed out every chance they could either directly or indirectly that the man was severely impaired by alcohol and someone like that what can they do with guns the eyes and they hear it in the interior vision as i said over and over again it was all played for the jury and they asked him about guns guns on their guns were for him to for pages and pages of the transcript aged twenty thirteen when the retired police officer went over there twice did he not say anything about the smell and did he say i looked around i saw him and he seen mentions interior doors being open he didn't see anything maybe he didn't recognize it as a door maybe he didn't but this is a kid is this proved beyond a reasonable doubt as proof beyond reasonable doubt when they say will run a bit and was told to stay out of the house that shows he didn't want anybody in this house in for him that he killed the stick that there is nothing like that here so we were talking about without any evidence overwhelming i submit to you that it was not and that's why the gun evidence and in related thousand and seven so many years earlier no wild witnesses and we don't really know what happened what we have here these two drunk people and the police got a call is that really for the stature nor her intent is that really enough to put that in considering how awful it terrible i guess was the evidence that it would have been skeletal remains in that january twenty third scene when he went in there because that's what i thought the police officer actually needed sometime yes there is d n a but the testing if you look at the record in the briefs the testing it was not complete on that door we don't know what else was up a store perhaps if the door of the area is tested all these things are evidence but it's on the low end of probative d n a evidence once they get past that d n a evidence they have defendant's statement to the police well you know i was away for a short time and i thought we had some problems and i thought she went back to missouri that's where she came from if somebody goes someplace that they used to be and i'm going to go back to the woman car we put jet ski see we take our purse we take her i things why didn't he tell her needed not to go in the house that's not proof beyond a reasonable doubt well then it's now and then we listen to the rest of what he tells the police that is before the jury that well she was dealing drugs and she was in all sorts of strange  and how he lives is different i submit than everybody in this room but what he was doing and how he behaved whether or not when you go to home depot and my things with a credit card were there would be a record of it that's just purchased a home improvement and the re were other things in the letter dated house mysteriously enough this record also shows that the neighbors who were around him saw him some of the people who actually knew him the retired police officer his behavior starts to change after he gets back from this trip night those days i think there should be a trial where we don't hear about guns we don't hear about alleged incidences abuse where the charges were dismissed and let's let the jury hear those things and then see if they believe that that