consolidate this appeal and then appeal you could argue they if you folks agree with this you can do an expedited briefing in just supplemental briefs on your this pending appeal on the one thirty seven issue he supplemental reeves as opposed to doing the briefs in a separate appeal i put you know you don't have to agree with that if you're sitting here but if that is agreeable to you clo and that's a legal conclusion that the court hasn't made the physician making that inclusion is you know the real question is do we get to hear we love the judge make that attach all documents that are lined up on and they have to provide factual background or factual underpinnings that support any conclusions that are made in the affidavit here and again this is a procedural question  discovery at least let the petitioner and the deposition the treating your office say let's talk about the course of treatment from two thousand and five through two thousand what do you mean when you say for example that he suffers from a neurological deficit but filed from family members describing meanwhile it's come again i can only describe as a market change in behavior following the fall and that changing behavior failing to recognize siblings and children just you know a market shift in corresponding or communicating with family members these are significant changes and you know it's one thing for a doctor  significant or law school injury no longer communicates with you might be nice is you these are things that as a family member in good faith when you come in with a vision like this you ought to be able to explore and estranged from his father for eighteen years and he is though asking to have himself appointed as the guardian of the person of a father who said he wanted nothing to do  mr ever since then the family has been somewhat dysfunctional and estrangement between james and lily on one side and some of his brothers and the father and that's been consistent to characteristics of the family for the last eighteen years in fact the father did not communicate with james and later the other son for a period of eighteen years in two thousand and five that hanley the father had been annoyed by some of the actions of his sons who are strange to me he wrote them a note that he did not wish to communicate with them anymore in two thousand and ten james backup documents and i'm not at this point that the doctor's reports were in statutory form the statute or legislature power of attorney trumps the guardianship there was actually no need for guardianship because the power of attorney was in place and the other estate planning documents and that's all in the record two doctors  he did not choose to talk to is a strange sentence when he was confronted by them on various occasions one was in a restaurant these facts if taken as true were remote years later those sons had actively been competing against the company it was the professional job of mr james hanley the petitioner here to compete and to win contracts and business  had plainly stated that he objected to the initiation and continuation of these workers he deems the domestic violence act requires that that someone like mr hanley not proceed in the face of objection in two thousand and eight mr bradley referred to the letter that mr in with the follower said to james and the other sons i do not wish to communicate with you at this time you lack of integrity and dishonesty have been to large a part of my life i have moved on would ask that you try to do the same i will submit to the court that nothing could be playing in terms of an objection to l ninety one applies both to summary judgment motions and six nights emotions based on nothing so the real question and by the way in reading further in our grief because counsel quoted from it the case law the same case first of all you know that the dysfunction in the family that you know the disputes if you will go to suffer more than a record and i'm not here to deny that but the question every comes as a child you stop hearing my parent when you see what you honestly believe to be exploitation do you turn a blind eye to that just because  father and you had a dispute or do you try to do something about my client decided based on what he has seen that he wanted to at least tried to do something about the funeral of one of his siblings and it does you know was was shocking to his now this sibling there's no allegation that he was involved in some sort of a business future he had been cut off you know this is not j james cameron it's other family members that saw this change in their brother or their father and jim hanley decided that he wanted to try to do something about  so again we're here procedurally following a motion to dismiss on the question of the court asking answer should the case a bent dismissed based on cursory reports without factual