MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
pending against males when mills produced concrete contract in the newton letter in two thousand sit she was not granted leave to enter the glo now played it did not know did not have access to either the local ball or will contract in the middle letter which defines the extent of the placed so solemn prior to the time it was actually produced in discovery so your claim is that when she when she discovers the bridge has a question of fact yes it's not been yes where the interest to rise to the saying so is the privy she has a right to a force the contract and the statute of limitations of a written contract is ten years and this action is  without knowing the specific limits placed on the sony in a contract because the contract is the critical factor in the second to the causes of th and then you find out later that i took an extra hundred breached the contract actually i paid for hundred apples that i could but i also let's assume that this action took place if there was more than the contract fault for being are you saying that that action is incapable of being characterized wills as a breach of contract and also characterizes with conversion because the concepts are mutually exclusive and if so what is your that must be a conversion it cannot be a breach of contract we also know very shortly after the cuts occur she contacted mr harmon wanting to know how much they were but i didn't want her she also had a third party contact mr hart and say wow how view need to go check with your mother find out this is an issue between your mother well let me rephrase my question yet where she ever told of the substance of the contract the amount  that compensation to be a or where she ever told her how much was actually based upon the record his income or the support he answered was no she was not told he was told
so that there is no wiggle room or room for doubt with regard that you simply walk or there's a slight ramp so you don't even need to him but he will be permitted to explain that to attempt to rehabilitate him with regard to this this photograph  old she weighed over two hundred marilyn previously having the replacement she had been on an experimental drug she had diabetes she had a chronic wasting disease weakness in bringing them with at the time the expert about the picture just in general with the witnesses knowledge may be developed on cross examination to discredit or destroy witnesses but that is why it's very significant because the circumstances surrounding his offer peace in the very that go to his sincerity the strength of his opinion whatever i may understand it if the questioning is aren't you the guy in charge of this building couldn't you put up an real if you wanted to and you did a picture i understand that perfectly it or you know if you work at the sears tower in chicago and there's no handrail in there you know hundreds and hundreds of offices i mean how can that somehow weigh negatively for the existing circumstances that the anticipated highly favorable testimony would bar and you knew that at the time that the name was read if you're well i can tell you that he would  abandon that the logic is just not a political here at all the purpose of the structure is to counteract early rule with the all withholding of evidence and the promise to the jury instruction even say that the presumption depends on the
thirty seven fift
that but basically doctors or others pressure in the market that are reasonable fees what they normally charge is a reasonable rate and it would serve the purpose of this policy of getting the money to the house to hers if the
had begins i guess an exploration i would say of for more options you know more construction renovation consolidation options discreet work it is as we talked about a couple meetings go last meeting we just felt that we needed t community form form and i'm looking at monday february eighth i sort of come down on you right now and you don't have to say yes here but that that's the week before any grand plan if it's a consolidation plan on the table then it will be sort of communicate to them that we want to get get us to the table and get in the queue for some form of construction or i'm sure she's a wonderful we're driving now we're talking about giving our know but let the record that kind of late again so i propose that we start on pretty labor day like we did this past year and we did the same thing in two thousand and ten you know i went out wasn't as well received policy over labor day weekend so we could hit the ground running like i would like we would like and then still have kind of clear minds going into the weekend and then and then get rolling the week after so that that's one option and if we start learning and i know the patients are important but i think you i just will say two days in september are exponentially more valuable than two days and i know it's only two days it's significant such as my d this is just sports i want to be super clear there there is suspended twenty five percent of the season second offenses for their defenses the whole season so the only reason that that you know room yeah i think that there was a lot of questions among the committee about the social worker i would just actually like to commend all of the ministration for putting that forward i think that's this cutting edge i think what you're doing with the middle school on suicide prevention is what we exactly to be doing and i can tell you the stats are incredible one out of four p attrition visits are for mental health issues the fact that twenty percent of the kids that will graduate from this high school walk occurred depression i think one is just the beginning quite frankly i would commend you and as the dog is the father of two daughters every night i worry honestly much more about their mental health than about their physical health and i commend you for that and i hope you fight for that it's the beginning of the
difference in one person's life focus on eyes that hypertension diabetes and obesity work are out everybody is doing it in the medical field because the patients at the center but in the world or how the patient  you want to you want to be able to offer example top of the free clinic is a place of hope not just for our patients but for those who come again how our patients we tried so hard to be that sure in the store i would love to have three times in five days say so that we can get more doctors to come in and help us to try to do some of the alternative medicine pen so they can't get their medicine or now we're faced with they can't get a doctor so they're in our clinic until the final doctor sometimes will say two or three months that to be able to help humanity it is very touching even though i don't understand what you're saying i appreciate you guys being in your area of expertise and enjoying what you do very well mostly which is unfortunate because i really think on there making it difficult for people to have access and that's not what we're all we all have the same goal which is to get people appropriate care from the best and most appropriately trained
craft when the terrorizing sux there there probably would have been relief granted in other words where the petition or the pleading is there any indication that a motion to flores came to this conclusion because they felt that this is a major thing that a person is losing a direct appeal and it is such a major because you don't because that's not what happened what the court did was whether it was determined to did not turn or even look at whether or not their petition had been verified w it doesn't it doesn't tell us jurisdiction to continue on and
and nothing but the t
and effectiveness the commission
effectiveness the commission
and ten when we first got together for beethoven and mozart and some people were here for that and here for that first performance as since then we've been doing this and it goes with the next phase of the program
supreme court explained and burns that department of corrections professionals in general are on scene to iron mike and with the department because of their overarching national and you share your responsibilities to their patients so that was true as a general
are definitely an explanation is another captain and i'll be right back with everything right up there everything is left if that's what you mean but the window in the library wasn't that somebody in the house or
it's limits to the i'm sure their points are lifebelt here claim against his all state policy his position was well you might damage succeed you know the point or the limits i should be able to access these uninsured motorist limits of the allstate policy that's not a violation of insurance co and all state policy was but the exclusion wasn't forcible because you perceive the middle no amount of coverage in the uk and the reason why it was in forcible must again public policy behind this the supreme court said we have repeatedly stated that the purpose of the uninsured motorists and you just provide cover for which would compensate you for at least the same extent he would have been if he had been injured in injured by all and all that happened was after the trial court found there was a cover at the insured was entitled to uninsured motorist coverage we forwarded the amount of the undisputed power of this twenty thousand dollars so this is not a situation where the insurance company did not pay anything and even though he even on the wrist card oh it's not a situation where the insurance company refused to pay anything they want to have the senate check for the undisputed amount clause to this situation accident december twenty eighth when you hope to involve easiness andersen pursuant to the provision and limitations of its policy of insurance so i mean there is no finding exact exactly what how much cover was o
forty three twenty nine the school five fifty one left to go in the third the way they go about things
judge giving the ten year sentence because of the seven days or because of his fifteen prior felony conviction i salute lead did he if it was appropriate for the former take into account the man brighter and i understand you know that if this was a man who had no prior record and he got ten years in the circumstance that's one argument that when the defendant has fifteen prior felony convictions and that's something that the court can take into
park and i learned a very unfortunate lesson when i was about nineteen never crashed car and so i did not the fact of the matter is that reno is in her mid fifty's she  for stage breast cancer she has two eight year old twin boys she had never had any criminal conviction other than this one and she's sitting in cars well right now waiting for the decision of this court will that did not want to have represent her at the trial this is something that happens often in the trial for the last time this happened when i was involved was over in the eastern district  because the time of judgement is near that she had better make a decision now about who she really wants to have represent her and because the time  exercises no discretion her poems are clear that she was the one that was in charge of her calendar this was the date that will set for trial and this is the day that we're going to trial no ifs ands or buts about it and that shows an absolute lack of discretion drugs this was the third trial set in i believe the  two counsel and the sentence and frankly i am somewhat interested in the sentence because even though it's ten million dollars i have never seen a sentence even close to seventy five years for a white collar other sentences that have been handed down to other defendants for for similar crimes or greater crime and i would consider a greater crime crimes of violence repeat offenders  lose sight of the fact that she is a human being that deserves respect and deserves to be treated fairly and this tapping of sentences she never accepted responsibility for her actions the district court went through those factors and others at length for the sentencing transcript of them as on page two thousand twenty two twenty three as your honour's concerned that this is a set since april for the convenience of the government the parties the defendant the time with with respect to one more point regarding the sense i'm sorry that i jump ahead and jump back i would like to just address treating the defendant was a human being and that's really what we're talking about because you're pictures all over the map on this issue and and and i think what we have to do is look at our common sense of experience and how sentences are given in the federal district and sentences are given like this in the federal district court just doesn't happen
one last chance to sell my gas  true friend go just all on the watchtower by what a great job thank you way the stars look very different and there's nothing i can
black letter law now you may disagree with me and if you do that's not please don't that it is up to the arbitrator to determine whether the contract as a whole is a forcible arbitrator or at least one of the arguments you made is that the army traitor is supposed to decide whether this particular arbitration clause is going to apply to this vehicle go ahead then if the parties bargain to allow the arbitrator to decide the issue does that bargain have to be between the parties now the words didn't have to be between santander and sergio because you're changing the law now you're not  arbitrator will decide in the first instance whether a dispute is arguable now the chords at least as i read the are divided this into two sections one is the contract and one is the arbitration and the courts are not a vestige of america already and the f a a because there are certain defenses that can be raised and those defenses and i think under who's going to decide whether to have met additional evidence to explain the ambiguity arbitration clause is ambiguous in how it's written who determines whether a clause that arbitration places place of arbitration class action costs other important something rather
cation he said well because that the only altercation we had that night so we have these two witnesses who are both putting two and two together in their mind but in fact not based on a first hand identification herself to be under the influence at the time mr walker described something users of the shooter you described as a above what she said refers to an afro in the clo day this is in contradiction of those who miss davis who is the the woman who was shot she gave republicans directions actually when she went to the hospital she said that she was on also by mr walker where these you know these folks are going about their business on this evening have had no enemies that they would harm and so the only possible explanation in their minds is that it must then off a patient from random violence is certainly a possibility and for that reason their recollections quickly conform to the altercation those experience earlier in the evening is that that was our the truth of the matter asserted that not only that he said but that that was actually the case that the person driving towards you then raise a light skinned arm out the window and fired five or six shot well really key only critical issue is the idea of identification of the shooter mr lester you said he's quite sure of it as it's had sony is not completely aligned with the other witnesses and so a manager employee of a bar or club about five blocks away which was a similar name of arrogance the the testimony from mr moore and him outside of their sousing out of their view within several minutes of this occurrence and it seems to be of no help whatsoever so helen's condition contention is that there is no sound tactical reason for the testimony it wasn't alibi testimony if anything it raises more questions than answers and even though they may have a favorable regard for this and then are willing to testify on his behalf it's certainly not the sort of thing that one would offer as an alibi stated that's the guy we kicked out of the club for the words this i don't teach an occurred before the shooting started next consider that when law school was released from the hospital three days later immediately went to the police view walker saw only an arm and lewis stuff down and i didn't see even that  in her purse when luck said hey that's the guy they love and that's what prompted her to look up just in time only to see a light skinned man and at that point the shooting started at last pushed her down evident to support feed and an alibi defense and you can look in the defense's closing argument and see how defense counsel used that to testimony to argue that the defendant i cannot possibly have had enough time to recollection to the facts that would point to the person had no patience with earlier in the evening and one of the other facts that i think lend support to that position is that with t davis is standing right next to him and she sees a dark
situation here
want to make a couple of comments with regard to this record in this case mr leahy was a long term employee for d h l which was preceded in his work career by a company called peer borne express on the day question in stops and the number of times he had to drive get out of the truck get back in the truck it's also stated in the release and it's mentioned in the footnote that there was a prior decision before this body relating to injury in two thousand and four which involved his ba to him pain discomfort weird feeling whatever it might be ultimately he just determines that he has to seek medical treatment he has to wait for support when he sees dr citric approximately nine or ten days after and he continues to work and continues to work in faith if i but i'm not mistaken the record shows the one to continue to work until we reach a certain level to get his full attention the millions who will be in this big there's no doubt they sit in the injury issue the pathology mystere the condition worsened so when the cone gives an opinion that the could leave his current condition of the knees or lose the result of normal degenerative process and yet he specifically then acknowledges he wasn't aware of opinion you should put but the thing that troubles me the most is that our to the employer have to buy his left knee in his right pain when he only complained initially to this big well we know first of all that's not true but second of all the real reason the workers compensation insurance exists in this  needs when he's undergoing physical therapy for feel that dr said it it's a question of fact as to whether this event did occur course or contributed to his need for medical treatment is opposed to it merely be a natural and he was a new boss and he felt a twinge and something popped in his right knee and then he later rescinded that statement on cross examination when it was pointed out to him that he made no reference of any type of in september two thousand
passing getting at the start of the second quarter very good play there carolina but opens up the play and there's a lot of contact there but no call westwood keeps it in play and that yeah i could pass by wanting good defense by westwood a minute third quarter there is no change in the thought about it kicks it out and have a foul on the floor so halfway through the third quarter west nice pass inside she knocked it off her leg that was great would and they're running with
that young man saved my life if it weren't for him right around he is indeed one of those of whom the house will always be proud will be your duty to one cover the leaders of this plot and place them in custody it may be advisable to wear civilian clothes these confidential orders and dana your credential and  impress those from the old well what do you mean that we'd better speak about that later but i'll be glad to introduce you to some influential people when we reach they feel that i don't think you  them i tell you the time is right it was fabulous i'm independent republic separated from the state by indians whose friendship we will be doubly safe against in remains but the threat of the telegraph whose destination we are trying to learn we must not allow it to arrive just as we must not allow other teams or supplement to remain  enemy has direct communication with washington our plans are ruined the telegraph line must be destroyed by nothing yet we must wait until it comes within striking distance the plan will succeed gentlemen you may go remember i'm sending you out into the field as missionaries to win others to our call be cautious bring people who might not be in sympathy with us even barely six i suppose so far in getting rid of our enemies through but too many killings might arouse suspicion we cannot afford to happen till we're more strongly  shall personally see to it that you have a place to stay until you have determined where you would like to invest in the property very nice of you not at all many happy family here already i think you would be interested in what we're trying to and that's the yankee spy we'll be with him friends and neighbors the time has come when we must form a free and independent country of our all that calmly is ready to tackle the world with its feet we are at peace with the surrounding indian cry then human human gives and gave in reconstructing the unfortunate follow up or they can stop us before they can even become aware of what we are trying to do we will be safe in an empire that is true why did they attack the wagon train and kill your friends and same purpose hoping to find a happier lantz where we can live in peace and security but we can never do so all while our traitor and murderers among us like this man it's neighbors are you going to believe even helping you come over to see if i've been wanting to think you tell me are you very a yankee fan i'm afraid i'll have to think guilty to what i'm trying to do in your sympathy with my country your country our country and i'm only trying to drive out these conspirators but force us into another war even more i recognized this man  i thank you for your cooperation back we're not going back we're going to town to town yet a minister just arrived on the stage today
can even if there were the inclusion that he was living there that's not dispositive because of the situation as fond of our friends jacket and it's just simply not a result infer that even someone who's living with someone is going to know everything that's hidden inside pockets of their jack and your owners have any question that before you know anything about  saw the call an officer sayings and stop the vehicle if it was a passenger and i believe i'm not mistaken i believe it was the thing is that i think it was problematic well if you're going to take a hike ok is under control someone else at the time as well so i think that what we have here is we have defended having sufficient connections of your problem sufficient to control of the room that basically you  that's about all i can say about it because i mean that i have no idea what was going on  i mean we did and the reason i'm asking now i'm not trying to be unfair and all reason i'm asking is that there are serious cases where the supreme court yes declare that you know that they've always had a role that this is the hallway and there's a doorway a door that goes into this room from the hallway and it's sort of it's almost like two rooms it's limited to different sections and this was really there's not much about the briefs so it's not really you have to watch me much so the first section of it there's certain nuns and women's clothing around there and that's where most of the shoes work and some of them are hanging out and then to get the second room you pull back the curtain and you go through the little doorway out bank and when you open the curtain then there's a cloak and there's