MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
any questions about the evidence here that we're talking about the nine millimeter gun and the cocaine now the nine millimeter gun was not to go  even if the case had been if these charges had been severed correct no i don't i don't know how it would fall again on the issue of identity and that's one of the things that a court would look to yes going to court is i would defendant several days there sometime before this murder yes made the statement i forgotten the verb but anyway go are travel this is extremely good believe that is extremely probably of of identity and then but you had you going to let this state bring this in so they can make whatever but again i think it depends on how you look at the case there was no direct no testimony from anyone who said ice the person in the car it's the same person who's sitting in the car who is the same person who shot the victim same guy jumping out of the car running i don't know ten feet across the street and get hit by a car everybody has their eyes on him everyone knows it's the same god that is in the car is are hanging down so when they get in the ambulance the same guy how how could you not identifying him how could you not be identified without bringing in those weapons it without bringing in that cocaine think that the key consider the factors that are involved the time the closeness of time and place prove that he was the fact that this whole thing is inadmissible he said ok i think this is close enough that it should be  up you know when was a phone call made or anything like that i think that's the main distinction between us would you agree that there are parts of clarke's statements that were not based upon his personal the one of course i think is object on the basis of not part of the person and i think that's the part that we're beyond this person was the name of the person they hit him in the car and this reference to the b whole in effect you don't just pick up isolated incident or water isolated thing say ok this was wrong therefore he is in cause you have to look at the whole body of the work of the attorney in this case and i think if you take a look has a great question because yes why this is so confusing because we wrap it up in it the reason why it's confusing is because the defense is claiming i didn't do that i think
applying a higher rating under certain circumstances in fact one of the cases gas much higher it was was applied but it this case with the defendant hindered the order mr steele the defend within thirty days of the september seventh judgment the defendant filing motions and groups seeking to have the three comparable sales relied upon by the plaintiffs appraiser to be stricken for various reasons a hearing held on that motion the trial or rule or result on the that those were not appropriate comparable sales for the appraiser to redo and there for since the appraiser had no comparable sales to determine burly must be within the range of the others in the case by excluding mr right there prior to trial there was no chance for of the department to avoid a verdict of less than one point eight million dollars that was in the news the description thank you very much thank you you'll have the opportunity for me  argue that those factors that are to be considered by the poor are in the nature of setting interest applying sell off of what was already paid and the time to calculate this  interest is a necessary mandatory constitutional part of just compensation this property was a legally or years before the fact that
into this war even compatibility as well last we're not going to get away from them during this time period the ability to use their their land as it was this all start and i think that that gives the county is going to control this property they exercise that authority and made it all called political by the elected representatives of the county decided it's a danger to use this specific baffling the parking lot and the park right now i think that you can pretty well fish from that that confines of the range and it doesn't say that the firearms are free mishandled there it doesn't say even that the firearm be distorted or the didn't ever complete
this fifteen words an exception to the general  while it was definitely our position the judge fish correctly grain of the summary judgment motion order we also strongly urged that his order denying rangers motion to dismiss for structural imitation purpose was erroneous  commission approval of a contract and a commission of war which is the same thing the supreme court in our back in the seventy's had found yet it goes against i am well we're going to apply a ten year said it is either the resolve of surgery or off the male genius a blood infection we don't have evidence of either the one was resistant the other was not resistant we're talking about two separate things we don't even have a m action according to the case law is five years there's no question about that that family there swines best last however they try deuce for all evidence that's what they want to do there's another series of case was that if you in contraceptives are trying to introduce parole evidence now that takes an hour of the ten year written to a five year the supreme court in armstrong is we show says that you can pursue under one theory in this particular case they want to pursue with theory of being allowed to go outside the four corners of the contract and introduce or address how are they going outside of it if they're attempting to explain something inside their they're looking into language or meaning or awareness or what what the army's intended to do all of that is an explanation of the attempted explanation through oral at us with that they would like to introduce as to whether or not this is something that is just plain english training to the low back or not something that's understandable is plain english and you have to look elsewhere we would strongly english what relevance does that experience h is relevant to the issue as to whether or not there is a genuine issue of material fact if there is no journeyman issue a material fact based upon the the evidence intrusive when we think there is a there's a very proper position assumption i wasn't there so i can't tell you with a straight face finally exactly what it is but that's certainly my interpretation for that substantial amount of money and there are any other languages that could have been in current threats are so if someone were to read it and say well it's not ambiguous it would seem that all staph infections would be included because it's treatment to the lower back clear that makes it a statement of fact not how conclusion is that your position i mean isn't it isn't it just you reading a phrase if this is going to trial troll people would  been testimony as to what was in the bills what was in the records and that testimony would have been whether or not there were any unpaid bills for treatment to where treatment to the low back can just six days notice as a mitchell you better get in there in good file he had six months and he still did nothing and the supreme court patients are clear you never responsibility as an attorney especially in your area of
so it's just a minute matter of timing when  r b nor by the court both of whom read the documents differently from the way slick thought they were written and tended that's water under the bridge is not much we can do about it we decided not to feel case however we would like to consider fixing it so it doesn't happen again now the supply the planning commission is in the process of read considering all the zoning for the commercial product commercials on and we don't want to be there in fact an appearance to be interfering with that process but we'd like to have until such time as the planning commission comes up with a new set of rules we'd like to have our existing zoning rules or existing policy actually implemented and to be sufficiently unambiguous so that they are being  court won't make these mistakes again mistakes in our view i mean mistaken interpretation of what we intended so the question is since the select board is permitted to pass interim zoning regulations that have a certain life and have a certain protocol for passage we'd like to consider passing something that does not change the existing that so we've asked claudine to tell us how we go about that in greater detail we know that we are allowed to do it but there is a problem there's a process there are allowed processes and not a lo suitable which certainly includes retail and the like we want them in the village center and we don't want them sprawled across the countryside and we've got that power so it's pretty clear it's the policy of the state it's the policy of  county is the policy of this town and it didn't happen so we want to fix that and i want to emphasize again this is not a change in policy it's darning for massive massive tax if we can get away with it but there are a few simple things the smallest things that we can get away with to do the job like that's a background so we're delighted that over this is her first chance a force generating more of those things and she described if we call a halt stop now for six months or eight and something is  some development this prevented during that time in the new world it can come back so one is really one bad things are reversible and the other bad things are not reversible and that's always seems to hear a bad thing that's reversible six months from you know basic logic and rhetoric like the school says that's a no brainer change six words and do it as a musician to our current roster and then see what that's what that definition looks like what the second
look a little hop in there or force right there on top of the on ramsey at getting the ball up on the actual way as he did that time for a hoop and bring this belmont ahead fifteen fourteen he now has a chance at a three point play and he makes it  he didn't think so but the trailing a good part of the period but came on and a lot of part of the period early own going down annoying and kept on in the game and as the game progressed the press began to take its toll on burlington and don't mind the twenty five nineteen as we enter the second period down on us next opponent is wakefield at wakefield high school on friday night and  games left over the last game of the season against cathedral high schools and on the game on all the rest day games on the remainder of the season middlesex legal coach was not happy that they allowed burlington burlington allowed ferdinand to get behind them and score an easy who so if you don't want to call the boys team to wakefield you can come to town on high school also if you're interested in helping produce these games you can contact the belmont media huge thirty two twenty three we have six twenty two six twenty six to go in the second period then on scrambling craft seems to bother all the teams that they've played so far including the red devils tonight and that's not to say they aren't going to give up some easy baskets when they throw the ball over the top of the  and it's the seventeen files so belmont goes to the line for a one on one burlington has the ball under their defensive basket and here's an attempt to put it in play and it was good back to falling down in the corner back and as a follow on the looked like the possibility you filed number thirteen newman will get t gets a shot and yeah it was a possibility here of some time remaining on the clock because the clock the shot clock went off produce these games on that on one media center please contact jeremy measure at the belmont media center you can do that by calling their faces showing up for a visit and talking to pat ha second ashot the belmont leads forty seven thirty five at the end of the first half against burlington welcome back to the second half of the game basketball game at one a field house here in belmo for the touchdown  sixty seven forty two seventy one forty two it's not to say at this online keeps me in the ball down under the meyers ball is pushed out of bounds by the red devils belmont ball eighty one sixty four thirty three point six seconds to go in the game be playing friday night against wakefield
you know i looked up and there is the capitol building looking like a palace on the hill and the big front door opens and the president of the united states marches down the avenue with the bamberg photo and a band section honey produced to contact check that up and tell it to the books
good full look at a load those two packs of packing down to me yeah it's a very very good the st one i would be surprised just lost the ball contact but went backwards and recovered by a lincoln sudbury stay with the ball keep the ball good recognition to see that we consider it was slow to react to get back one hundred to run through and find the hole that's all like to see one of them play all right so belmont set up not too quick on the whistle and a half minutes going ni a little calm there i think that was the advantage that he was playing from for ok  i didn't see anything wrong with that last play there are not so when the referee sees a small fringe move that could be a well taken down the three back into contact well tried to cross when  seven just came in the side of the rock on that one and that finds touch just inside the twenty two i'd say this ball's probably coming out t belmont early tries to put them ahead and staying consistent consistently fighting through the defensive wall and breaking through tackle so they were attacking a bit more of that during those phases there than they had been before structure look right let's hope they can just keep doing that while they gained it so hard past receive just a little low in front i like the idea to kick the ball out of the i do this is own but she should set herself up with a little more time a little more space  inside center good running from the inside center  forty seven little more footwork when i go out of the contact and they just sort of crunching right into the place of don't really want to be looking for the gaps and you wanted that bowl in one hand and perhaps using you twenty three outside center and again fighting forward keeping those like move a great drive in the middle of the field looks like the ball is going to come clean out here and this pick just a little high that's how it will look like he was a little high has his arm out for the advantage gabby watches a lot of rugby herself that'll do it you know fifty to twenty one the professionals play and see what they can do is just gives you ideas you know give you some things to try your game so if it comes off the foot or off your leg it's play on soft your hand now she's taken down ability of winding through tackles fall into hands i don't know what she's doing with it it's arbitron everything at this in the last five minutes
good evening ladies and gentlemen and belmont basketball fans are gathered at the winter field house for the opening of the season by the belmont girls team have not yet to win a ballgame this season so this should be an interesting game belmont i was at the stoneham game and they were trailing by five or seven points in the third period but person to put belmont on the school board makes the first one is knocked out of bounds number eleven it is the sixth team and it was good who puts it up and she'll show up on sept twenty two thirteen with three eleven to go can make it over the time line second stewart keeping the ball high in the year on the rebound seventeen is being replaced by number twenty four  which makes the first one and brings your team within twelve belmont leads twenty eight sixteen with forty five seconds to go makes the second woods's replaced she has one left twenty eight seconds belmont can control the ball for the remainder of the half makes it  and the hole but it goes out of bounds belmont's ball with twelve seconds to go we're back when our field house for the second half of the belmont versus the only ten wildcats girls acidy basketball needs twenty eight to nineteen as we go into the second half of the game then have thirty seconds go from three point man rebound to i thirty five twenty six bel that does not get a shot off but they get by twelve forty two thirty with eight minutes to go in the final period which will be starting in a few moments belmont is coached for a number three ok ladies and gentlemen we're back after our technical difficulties with the battery sixty to go in the fourth period belmont leads forty three thirty two dollars in a separate by belmont it may have gone for a period of time and been able to  to substitutions or wilmington a lane violations of the basket does not count down one still leading by nine forty three thirty five twenty five to go in the fourth period replace the steward any color three point makes the first one so she gets to try the second back in the game christina woods replaces number eleven for  them sara stewart to help once pretty much held to a ten point lead throughout the second half christopher already meigs her first one but spellman up by eleven one fifty five to go in the fourth period two shots because you are in the bonus situation now also a double bonus so we'll get two shots
there's no there is no traditional the traditional definition of a conviction or a judgment is not complete until the sentences are correct that is true except that under the vehicle code when you look at the criminal someplace you drive through boone county you're not going to go to your home in cook county drive oh i bet you're right they're going to skip out on bail but that's the reason why they made this a conviction instead of just about forfeiture in subsequent funds it is treated as a as a conviction for sentencing purposes in court administrator purposes by the secretary of state for the same reasons that you just noted people skip off the avoid the consequences and they is whether this is a conviction or not i don't think best of all analysis of what the real crux of the case is what we're trying to decide here is whether this pond forfeiture under the vehicle co harvey they specifically said it he said for purposes of enhancing the sentence it was sufficient it was in a conviction in serious this court twice more  more than that with the there were two defendants there said that under the statutes it was the functional equivalent of a conviction now under traditional not by pleading guilty that's what many said but what i'm saying is that when you plead guilty you have to for the appellate court to look at the issue you have to follow six o four d n for which you have to wait in a post trial post a regard to the merits your honor we would agree with some of the questions that this court has brought up saying it's absolutely absurd to suggest that someone can purposefully a void going to avoid coming the legislature that we want people we want to heighten the sentences for those who are repeat offenders and in this case although i don't believe that his offenses were elevat because of criers i think here the offenses were elevated because he was driving over going to wait in driving under the influence wall not having why distance but that's not the point we were doing he was analyzing the statute in the purpose of  conviction is not the judgment it's just a conviction for purposes of sentencing enhanced with the purposes of the administrative duties of the secretary of state and if there is no judgment until what's what's there is the conviction but the judge it's not complete until the sentences imposed it seems to be a logical argument that flies into what you're suggesting but also comple theoretically yes that could be just issue an arrest warrant in trying to get him the problem with the vehicle cases is that you like i said before you get these transients people who go through counties and the resources of the county come into play are they going to travel all the way to cook county or to someplace down south to bring somebody back to boone county for prosecution and there could be one of the other reasons why everybody forfeitures are treated is a conviction it saves the county money
despite the story that that he  the specific line the agreement was that she would be paid two hundred fifty thousand dollars from the proceeds of the second the second thing well as ed mentioned there was one contract for sale they  that proceeds shall who died in a specified in the real estate contract a real estate commission of six percent and only the mortgage on the route sixty six driving range billing and the like and the balance of the lo four so in the face of the stipulation that these two parties with advice counsel signed off on less than a week of work closing it was very clear that steve was to perceive that those that did receive that it closing and i think it was an
group of concerned citizens united states  range approach if you want young men we want to help you see the american humane and how much are they willing to pay you want money goods always seem to think that people want money there are other things such as painting but to get the hell out of here balance of power on the entire african caught why didn't you tell me this before it still would have sucked it up to you and me any time that's enough to tell you michael because you are a freelancer freelancers have a nasty habit  i don't we don't know that he's right for all we know you've already shop run to the highest bidder that didn't have that fat bring him back and say that's a suicide i like the old man like a million dollars better than i'd like to be able to sleep nights worrying about some terrorist group shooting airliners out of the sky with a laser i'm telling you i want brought a plane to washington  right what do you just see who fell out of but free w he is a great fo who are you who are you working for dare you to do that again you were about to tell me who you work for could you make that five hours case good morning you came to rescue me the neat i'd love to shake hands i've been studying you enjoying the last few days and it would you better do better than your boys in the desert my daughter down there time is just one of the many thing you haven't been formally introduced oh no we've met but we're only now getting to know
basketball game what a final game in the m r i division one tournament it will be the belmont the riders playing the woman tennis starting for the a question being asked by the belmont coach as to whether they get another thirty seconds she may think the list i'm melissa hart may when they are given don't think they get a fresh thirty seconds as my mom was never in possession of the ball they get four seconds or seconds to get a shot that wasn't even close have probably gone to the low scoring game probably favors week over the weekend actually i believe they played on saturday shots by belmont belmont has one more fall before they get into the penalty situation i did not see the travel but that doesn't mean she didn't right for the hoop and it's no good rebound by my follow i thought you had one earlier but just not and over if they win this game and endo averages sixty one dollars points a game so all one's gonna need to pick up their off ends i think they're just waiting too long before they shoot for some reason they don't know if that's friends didn't like some of that said it was on twenty one but then one doesn't have a twenty one on the floor and on is replaced by m attempts to steal it doesn't ride to the hoop back outside or simply from the ball away too many times that i is up the ball once again the crowd is relatively quiet because this has not been a well played game not an exciting game by any means to get ahead the bird couldn't get control and we had a vowel on bird golf it will be here for reaching in and they will be shooting one on one so the boys play tomorrow night here against lost or and it could be that the girls will play wins the can i hear again and  next game which i believe will be wednesday night against and over here in belmo