specific comments to very prominent people in the romance literature industry about randy jackson and about any of them there and jackson you know she says st of all that they were more than all i mean the jury could maybe conclude that it's not but i will say for summary judgment purposes here when you have the question being why is randy alexander supporting jackson young alexander is married secondly you know defamation birthday is for that's one of the classic cases for defamation perceval when a statement goes to the inappropriate quote unquote sexual conduct which is shortly would include you know not being faithful to one's here's what i thought your strongest argument was well i think that there are opposing counsel has a strong argument as to but also here given the unique business model that we are and i had we were talking about a cover model on a romance book i mean who would want to buy a book with a creditor you great one and the day before is probably the most important piece of evidence here the day before gracie wilson made her post she was on  cover model from the group was was because of allegations of abuse and blackmail is not going to be permitted and then on may rd the statement stated that j y is banned from any very helpful to me that it's not all one thing and i thank you for clarifying that i think the question had to do with ms wilson and you started by saying that you thought that she had committed defamation as it was a conspiracy  nondisclosure agreement with ashley march who was a worker for our romantic times and they were working with her and towards d to the representations and i have a hard time finding that and so i need your help with that and i don't get assumptions from what you're suggesting is mostly because people have lots of bad motives but they don't do anything about it so posted content on base and in fact showed catherine box specific what she was going now they communicated with each other with text in email that would clearly tell us what they were talking made by my client regarding what defamation there would be and really all of these causes actually kind of stem from from a couple of statements that they put in their chronology that we weren't able to get those clearly of them were blackmailing people within the national community what about those two things well i guess st of all none of those things were were stated by either of my clients what my client the only thing they could possibly be attribute  find is that the administrator for the arts you website it said that he had been banned because they had received complaints regarding his actions and blackmail and so any minute before you go caff please because this for me this is why seems to me and so in that context right after him being called predator right after this allegation of blackmail which after all sounds pretty defamation per se like to me then there's an immediate response that he's banned so in context that at least all flights are well your honor i suppose it's not all slight we would argue certainly is because we are responding my client is in albany customer service arena i was sending her text about whether she shaved her private parts so i think that's the reference that they had regarding inappropriate they asked about or she stated that he'd asked her about it and that he was threatening to ruin her reputation give your client testify that her e mail was there's only she said it's the one guy in china who would know what happened her email or something like that wasn't about him is don't misunderstand america i don't believe you mis understand the record but the context of the question was what's the status questions the answer was i had set down my company i don't have any of the computers anymore and i think the comment regarding the person in china was more of a she believed that this was maybe in the clouds but she didn't know where those were so it was not it in the context of we want to get emails from between you and she was the context of what's going on business all right so getting back to your point that your client was her she didn't write down that the names of those individuals they just add with gracie when when they came up and and so she didn't write down the names she was just kind of taking in the information  you're not allowing somebody to come back i suppose somebody could take a negative assumption from the house but i don't believe that it arises to defamation they received complaints she was merely person to make allegations those present to the effect that the plaintiffs were engaged in black now about those comments that were made to that professional community and i think that's the that's again one of the issues that we've had throughout this there are been allegations that certain people will earn certain things i believe that ms alexander wrote in a notebook and that she was told certain things by certain  out xander is a notebook fairly self serving saying that different people are told her different things but even in the case the statements that i don't remember what it is specifically that she said  i'm sorry i'm confusing two things you're talking about blackmail or you're talking about an illicit affair i'm talking about blackmail i'm not talking about an illicit affair ok i believe the what they were concluded in the in the order that there was no statements that court for this session stand