petitioner testified that she was in a hurry or testified that she was worried about the road officer being mad at her or that she was trying to get to the female inmate she was supposed to pat started out yes so that would be a losing proposition for the plane what about the fact that if bad responsibility to clear iraq would object or is it our group for some reason to get would seem to indicate that that would be the case right in this case however even though there was testimony that the petitioner wore a belt that she was required to wear by her employer she was apparently carrying a scanner and she was wearing shoes whole gist of that issue of revolves around her requirement to make a wellness check every thirty minutes i believe the record says within this male pov she was assigned to the respondents mismatch will test her matching testified that the that they were that the petitioner was aware the fact that the wellness checks took precedence and that the making it over to the other area of the jail in order to do the pat down on the female inmate was not a was not a pipe and straight requirement it that was done as time permits at a she finished her wellness chase she testified as well that she was aware that that was the been she had been called to a three times by the officer in the detention center where she was going to pat down the female roommate showed her female inmate but she also testified that she was aware that was not a time sensitive issue getting over the pat down female inmate this is not road i think it's role but in that that if you look at the pathology of circumstances in this case i think that's relevant for a couple reasons number one there is no mention i mean we had  the accident was january twenty fifth two thousand and ten the one thousand be hearing was held on march sixteenth of two thousand and eleven so less thirteen months after the accident and nowhere between that they should fell in the facility and the one thousand be hearing the in this case virtually every other piece of evidence with regard to the accident doesn't support her version of events if she was actually rushing down the only to her misstep in fell i don't think there's anything other than the statements that she made at trial i don't think there's anything else in the record to sports from being perri or sports or being distracted other than her testimony at trial when the being actually actively examined and she seemed to move unrestricted unfettered i believe it was mr moran talked about how she was very restricted in her movements until the examination was over that she was able to get water and those came out normal the m r i said we're done the room eyes done prior to the accident from a previous injury and m r i is done after the accident and there was no change between those two m r i's so i would submit that if if surgery was necessary based on the fact that there is no positive diagnostics until a disk of graeme's eventually done there were no positive diagnostics and if she did need surgery she probably needed surgery prior to this and i don't think that the need for surgery was related to this particular fall challenging and it's fast paced what she said also was my client was one of the best and in the county at performing at it she said if it if it if they're planning correctly they can complete these wellness checks every thirty minutes she also said that most of the offers there is could not do the job within the thirty minutes and when you look physically at what it required it required that the officer drove up and down two flights of sixteen steps every half an hour they had to go to seven different male pide units and count up to sixty four detainee every every half hour physically then they would have to if the detainees made a request they want to paste they want to raise her they want some personal comfort item  preoccupied with the tasks you need to complete the makeup actually said this is during her testimony she's preoccupied with the task seems to complain complete with a male pattern baldness check she's stressed because she knows the road officer is becoming impatient she's  referring to time as being the guy who's talking about my client's credibility i want to point out that town is the respondent stacker but he never released my client to return to work after graphics and he always placed around restrictions in the respondent could not to eleven mr moore and kept my client on restriction so obviously he thought something was wrong she was not restrictions before she fell back to lammy i think it's an interesting thing to i think he actually supports kweisi because what lammy said was she opinion some thirteen months after yak that she was in a hurry or that she struck at her that something had something that caused her fall other than her just not paying attention to what she was doing as far as the the medical and the causal connection