record i don't just never stated that she was threatened only over the phone but on cross exam at the ministry of record page one seventy one petitioner was questioned about this issue he says he clearly stated there's been no physical harm but they did threaten her mentally on the telephone and so on the fact that petitions what was threatened on the phone isn't mutually exclusive of the fact that she was also threatened in person what about the number of hours she worked for the y m c a that was a pretty because the assessment to refer is inconsistent with the determination regarding the circumstances under which the notes are found to be in permissibly you in this case summary of what was what took place in the asylum interview and that is actually more reliable than some handwritten notes that contain grammatical or not inadmissible they're not invincible but you must ascertain of the reliability of that stores before you can to the camps once a month but in addition to that he would also hire a doctor on his own and he would go out and offer medical services to those who couldn't couldn't pay for it one of the auspices of the y c y m c a if the credibility finding wasn't supported by if the adverse credibility wasn't supported by substantial evidence if you step outside his membership in the y m c a qualify as a membership in a social group would there be i mean would  there be a backup way that your client would not qualify for asylum well here with the petitioners also arguing that he has been persecuted on account of an imputed political position connection with the police they have links to the police which is which is supported by state department documents that he that they are linked to the government and the ruling government in his state in another part of india so the two or two groups the police in india and they should send persecute him on based on the erroneous belief that he was persecuting are converting hindus to christianity but you wouldn't say the y m c a wouldn't be a social group i would argue that it is but who are implicated in converting hindus and the b j p is is a dominant party in in their area states in india including the state and from where the petitioner is from as well as bordering states so you don't think there's any support for the fact that he could safely requote located elsewhere i don't and i particularly emphasize the fiar g s analysis here is not individual i see merely just made this passing statement that that he could relocate and his his his internal relocation argument is based on his perception that the the petitioner would have to go back to india and disassociate himself from the y m c a and disassociate himself from christian and christianity there's any christian groups related to christians there's that's not the immigration judge reasonably relied on inconsistency is regarding the petitioner's level of involvement with the wind he said and this application that he got to camp once a month he said this testimony that he worked hours week per month however before the asylum officer he said he only worked once a month at the y m c a medical camp and that's a material inconsistency in the immigration judge is his primitive to draw a neg a reasonable negative inference from that he's not required to support his new contentions is that it enhanced contentions before the immigration judge regarding his level of involvement with the y m c a regarding the nature of his injuries and regarding whether his wife has continued to be even if it were to go to the adverse credibility finding it's still presume that the immigration judge didn't find that the events that the events described above the level of mass persecution because he goes on to analyze it under the well founded fear fists and then kicked with boots before they threaten that they would burn him and his family alive and then the police detain him for six days during which time he was beaten with sticks while they're strapped and threatened with death if that's not persecution i'm not sure what it is what is persecution any conceivable definition of persecution in this circuit by by declaring that he she was a y m c a member and that she wasn't converting hindus to christianity when one petitioner did that he was in his his harm in india was significantly increased he was he was persecuted