unconstitutional for violating the constitutional prohibition against special legislation the act takes peace officers ploy by a school district in a police department in school districts in the state into two groups the first group is those who have police departments five peace officers on the date of the act and then the other ones that do not have peace officers  be without question school districts differently than the tree community colleges school districts meet coppered charter schools other educational employers differently their school districts differently than all these other educational w schools but again why why is that by those that are qualified to the school districts in that community college what's the rational basis for that or or charter schools the other reason is because there is a conflict between there could be a possible conflict between police officers pull the in school district offices if they have apparently the right right i don't quite understand it recently but it still doesn't explain why you would give you would do that for our for  school district and when the catholics still be there for a community college for which isn't the same community a co operative school district or a charter school so that even even if we if you read it out of the act which i don't think you can decide them on the basis of the trial court the legal arguments when you're talking however here special legislation a claim of there being no rational basis is this arguments counsel i think i think i think it could be because for example one of the arguments they made again i think they're wrong a legal basis but even on the factual basis and i'd love to have expert testimony on that is interested interests are traditionally tend to have tense does walk into existing working conditions it's very hard to change a working distance ref interest arbitration without giving something that the mayor of chicago right now was possibly having to strike with respect to change the working the working day i can guarantee you if i have testified he would say he would not want interest arbitration because interest arbitration is a good chance of losing unless he gives a lot more money to get the but interest arbitration haris just sort of position themselves to the point where they finally get in the best position for interest recreation and then have an arbitrator by we say on the issues on the big issues which way to which way they go i have they can take back his life they hate say that but that doesn't make it make it stop that's why you know we're here yes they have to come up with a rational reason for doing it and yes it's out you works in certain cases because because they're there for things on the other hand there's an issue of control here one of the reasons for doing it is these are our  if i'm drafting the legislation to accommodate interests that work to change this i'm wondering why you would want to put it this clause that might open up an argument to a terror searcher where frankly seems to  same way they did if universities no nobody else and the fact that you don't have to work you don't have to worry about what they did and that's the easy way to do it they could have done it but they didn't so the best of it i believe it was a purpose to applied only  a rational reason to distinguish peoria from rockford from champagne from campbell from granite city there is a rational reason that if they come up with it with a pot conflict issue when applyin danville just as much as  are such that they would they would fall within the public they were at because we have our issues but because this comes from their origin comes from the truant officer act so there's an issue a legal issue of whether peace officers or if they are peace officers under the federal statute are there peace officers or special police for example the police said care airports are special police and they are next they don't have the same rights legislation issue of course when determining whether or not a piece of legislation is constitutional there's always a strong presumption constitutionality lives yeah and reverse the trial court's dismissal of the complaint and some this matter back to the trial court to resolve the factual dispute that you just now acknowledge exists because because when in one thousand nine hundred four when both the educational like relations  basis for making this determination would be how what would the circuit court because whether or not employees are peace officers that's only going to be that's always turman when the when a petition is filed and it looks at what the board's test is forget determination so you know whether or not you know and that's always going to be that's always the case that every case is its own if there are or if there is another oh only a district that would fall under this differences in classification if that's what you want to describe it are not necessarily constitutional the questions that this reports test is does this discriminate in favor of some group i guess some is opposed to some other group that similarly situated and if it does then it's resolution mechanism so you've got to defer to resolution impact isn't dependent on the state's terminations that there are certain employees who it is not in the best interest the health and safety of the public to allow them to strike and those are you know peace officers firefighters security sometimes there's essential services that mean you know depending on the situation so the state the state's policy if you were to test a state's policy yeah it's oh so you know the state has decided that this is the best way to protect labor to this labor harmony and be this if this only applies to furia that if that's a function of death being the only unique situation the legislature is that prohibitive addressing a unique situation first of all if it runs or if it be stowed a special benefit or privilege which they can't make they're showing because all it's doing is substituting one dispute resolution procedure for another which the state has decided because if you take right to strike from a group of employees to maintain the balance of the economic balance in the goshi actions between the employer and the employees there have to be some other resolutions if the employees your legislature if the legislature has made a determination yet there's a certain group of employees that are akin to that are peace officers who peace officers or do not have the right to strike concerns yeah and so if there is such a group out there and they don't even have to be right the legislature does not have to be right yeah it's you know in its belief that this is a situation that needs to still other similar situation and even if it does then if you don't that's ok as long as there's a rational reason and here there's no special benefit what is the rational reason i'm not sure  that there was supposed to be a joke i guess it's not a joke here this is not a joke ok quite frankly i think i understand the technical strict construction that district is basing its apparent argument on until a few days ago i thought they were arguing about the legislators legislation purpose but they don't even get to that question unless you read in existence on the effect they are floyd by should be treated the same that's why i stated that that's mistake it's only prospect on the state board which is what they did the prior to times it would have been much simpler if they just used the same terminology again but they used this third time of the night or the journal something awful for which is what they said to her times in the same station they just didn't use the same magic words for a better term but not before and not before how would that have changed things i don't know that issue could be resolved i think the definition you have given very their argument that the supplies thought as of the effective date or whatever it would only apply to them all even if you and i think this goes back to your first question so we come all the way around even if that's true something for that so it would use you would have an equal protection argument which i probably should apply but i guess what other things so i'm asking you to