did happen after someone has a gun and now there is nobody yelling there was he said as he walked out but he still hears something slamming like cats i think with his  the circumstances with the op through with the entirety of the circumstances were at that sure i mean you look at the entire use of circumstances and i think one of the things you can look at is one of the officers actual testimony was the police officer to do an investigation which in my mind requires looking checking and what you know is he doesn't have to have probable cause apparently he has to have tell him that there's not a mercy corps he doesn't get the information from home until he's putting her arrest so there is a period of time where he doesn't know that there was no threat but there wasn't a threat the death scene we know that later we didn't know it at statement knowingly resisted or obstructed by a fast that boring evidence that the prosecution was trying to lessen the burden we disagree so while he did not address that as far as that  so now we have a dispassionate about a firearm in hands when the officers approach both officers who approached the arresting officer and then the second officer was coming from the west found direction they both heard brandon richardson yelling someone has a gun so now we have the dispatcher about someone in this home with a gun but we have somebody yelling running out of the house yelling that someone has a gun we don't know who has a gun but somebody in that area has a gun and only to prove that the police might be that good to invoke the emergency aid exception the police must have reasonable grounds to believe that there of the yelling coming from within the house and he testified that it was hostile and yelling so there was pounding there was hostile yelling and the timeline isn't clear as to when this subsided but when we don't know residence there was something funny in the scene i don't know that somebody would be running out of the house we need someone has a gun and it's all that's going on is somebody polishing a collection i mean i just don't see that happening this all men it's not all to a very strong argument that the officer reasonably believed that there was an emergency that needed to be taken care at this home in jones one of the officers or i didn't it was one officer it's not that there are people inside this house in this close domestic violence situation the officer would have a duty to continue to investigate here we believe that he not only had a right but we did go so far to say that he had to need to keep investigating and defense makes much of this investigation and then the officer talked about setting up a perimeter sending out a perimeter during an emergency situation is not inconsistent with having an emergency situation this is not home  to fields he didn't know what was going on at that point and once he was told to get back in the car he got back in harlem and you quit as far as the knowledge he didn't you know once his wife had been out of sight and what was going on oh we can see that she looked at the dispatch we don't know where that came from but there's a noise in the house there's hostile yelling and the fact that she was frantic when the officers arrived i think that cuts the other way i  and the knowledge and absent testimony from the defendant saying that she had knowledge or testimony saying that she didn't have knowledge which would be a credibility determination we have to infer the knowledge from circumstantial evidence and we have that here we have two officers who are well i don't know how close they were to the house but they were not as close as she was she was on the property and if they could hear somebody yelling never to government she should have known she didn't know that there was a reason that the officers were there there's hostile yelling in the house there's been there's pounding and there's somebody fleeing from the home yelling something about a gun and she frantically behaves in a way that doesn't allow the officers to engage or i'm sorry officer are not to engage in any type of conversation  when he has that we have to figure out what he was doing and why he is what he's releasing this for this work she has a place to litigate a violation if it occurs and that's in a court room isn't go through an infectious circumstance announced in her head she knows i can raise my right and that's what she was arrested for and what she did and why didn't she follow his orders because if she knows now she also knows that she needs to follow the orders  carr so the idea that she doesn't know that he's interfering or a right here she doesn't know it so she's interfere if she thinks she's right for the reason her right in the way like oh i see what you're saying comes out there's a bomb in the house or something i think dead puts an incredible duty on the person she's not been told why he's coming just know that there's an emergency and i mean i just don't see how the law can can your punishment for that