MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
i almost got in my sensible side i was right but the time didn't tell the driver was a passing a car going forty was like passing eighteen cars parked bumper to bumper that's three hundred feet or more and that takes so we oughta make sure whether any cars coming through and doubly sure there's plenty of distance between we drivers insist on having enough power to climb steep hill we also demand quick grip of momentum is dangerous we drivers should always keep our cars under control good drivers tell us that in climbing hills we should always go into second gear when i was speed drops to twenty miles an hour and there aren't any laws to make us go my mouth and momentum may be a friend starting uphill but he'll push his right off the road if we go down to five easy use your engine as a brak this is our life's good or bad let us see ahead clearly we're driving our headlights means we cannot stop within the space this includes a distance spent while deciding to stop the law moving the foot to the brake pedal and pressing it down we must remember the cars driving at speeds that cannot stop us this is our taking chance in our cars we're trying to reduce friction all we can we use ball bearings and roller bearings we smooth and polished parts we put all into our cars all to overcome friction in starting a car stopping it or turning a corner we need road friction for our tires but when ice and snow come the normal condition of this direction is change if we are as careful behind the wheel in slippery weather as we are and feeling our way on foot we can easily when going along the highways we drivers should make it our business to watch the road signs know what they mean benefit from a very tough act on their advice if we got in the habit of disregarding they lose their meaning of the traffic this offering more confusing we can see those things up ahead that make a stop and start we can see what's going on in other people's minds every interest every alley every car should be under suspicion we can't let the other  mistake got us into trouble talking yourself funny you don't recognize yourself when you're desperate expert drivers tell us we must give ourselves a margin of safety or reserve space between our cars and the one
that the point but the question was
this is a story of a holiday and h elping make ready a celebration is part of the fun  friends invited to dinner  we remember the pilgrims had only rough table on which to serve the first thanksgiving feast yet it was shared with friendly indeed  good manners make people happy and a good table manners make eating together a happy time it just wouldn't be thanksgiving without turkey we know mother knows how to cook it and father knows how to it is fine to know how to set up and watch it being caught that the first thanksgiving dinner the indians didn't eat turkey with a fork but it is easy to learn to use one the right way to take small about f it is good to have learned to chew with lips close and no friend to take a drink  learning to use a knife the right way takes practice getting each time we do it becomes easier nice to talk with others we are glad to eat meat without spot holidays are fun it is fine to have learned so much and to have so much in our full to make holiday celebration
or whether we can that would be child i would definitely have a broader
one yesterday why don't you run the post office and run down to the post office it's only a mile away you see congress can do everything every thing except another post o in your face every state is printing its own money now you that's it but now i know what to put in my speech for the club and so gentlemen my topic is the powers of karma none of us ever had the days to criticize congress at every opportunity but how many ever stop to think about the broad powers of congress and how these powers affect every them the importance of congress can be seen when we no we note that the framers of the constitution devoted the very first article to that branch of our government our legislative powers here and granted shall be vested in the congress of the united states and making all the laws necessary for carrying out th these powers reach right into our homes into our very lives for instance we know that the food we eat is pure why because it is inspected under laws made through the power of congress to regulate interstate commerce this same power includes control of railroad fares and freight rates the commerce of the air the traffic of cross country traffic congress even limits the number of hours we worked in the minimum salaries were powers of the establishment operates under congressional authorization of course everybody knows that congress has the power to levy a tax and we're always ready to complain about tax taxes purpose and other luxury items not gasoline and other things that are not luxury but we're not so ready to appreciate what we get from congress and return a network of federal highways that span our nation the great reclamation and power development our magnificent national parks guards protection of our health promotion of foreign trade assistance given farmers through such things as crop insurance and scientific and remember gentleman those are only a few illustrations of how the powers of congress affect each one of the store your personal welfare as well as the welfare of your country depends upon your active  d electing to congress men and women of such
five all dislike of all was we have things we do everything the customer so that is then is the process when we started so icing the budget the books and putting them together we make the sauce in the morning everything is fresh and that's what i would miss what brings people back
what we have here a very times there's no requirement that they play the entire video from beginning to end during your deliberations assuming no one else is press back we're talking about i think especially the
the district court discussion in light of three separate shots each of which required aiming again and a separate part of the trigger and the use of expanding or right before this happened i do know that the person he shot had a pistol with his back well right kind of the reason for my question yes if he had additional one of more additional firearms to choose from and he chose the most destructive one that also might bear on the question that i'm asking i think we have to put ourselves in the position of a jury who was told by the prosecutor defying murder and they did not and they were presented with all these arguments  soldier number three didn't get any input from the other jurors so it's not not surprising that different jersey have different views at one point in time this isn't necessarily cutting he gets the outcome you desire but i am troubled by putting too much weight on one problem hopefully you can help us with it the error here is a pretty special we wouldn't be here if these aggravators had been presented to the jury both sides had had an opportunity to argue in the jury rendered a finding as to these factors correct correct so we're left in some respects to guess what they would have done and it's here because on the one hand they acquitted him of first degree murder which necessarily involves premeditation yet they didn't fully accept his imperfect self defense theory either in the record we have the prosecutor arguments made to the jury about how serious these things were helped countless they were cent center and the just and the judge's findings without jury help but the defense had no opportunity as your colleague points out to argue the other side of that coin but that's exactly  did so so she was certainly a responsible and she was criminally liable for the crime that occurred but that whether she can be whether the jury might or would have found any fact are particularly
shown with a certificate of fines so that issue really is turning to the second
tough job getting so tough as for you think what did you come from oh i've been around i know an easy way to get materials and make telephone you when what ar don't need an army just a little imagin well so far so good but your job is only half done you still haven't got a telephone haven't you got any imagination  that's movie stuff
two questions you would like us to address the first is does this court have jurisdiction to hear an appeal of the trial courts to a sponsor a order of remain and seconded the district court have the authority to issue the remain an order order and the site the answer to the second question is no the trial court did not have the authority to issue the reason and order that's a question here first i would like to to address the court's jurisdiction under the recently enacted class action to determine whether the trial court had the authority to do what he did there's a long line of cases in the ninth circuit for that proposition the most recent of which was the lively versus wild those moorcock which you get to sports that they could with all due respect your honor i believe we did comply with a judge to terrorise work he said that he wanted to plead facts that would show that we had that that our principal place of business was in atlanta georgia which it is un opportunity to address it when i said we started him in our motion for reconsideration to live with thirty cases where courts in this court of appeals had concluded that the home depot's principal place of business was atlanta georgia no one has ever contested our affidavit that the only sworn facts that are in the in the record say that are not only is our principal place of business but our corporate headquarters is there and by and by our pleadings but you only get to that act if you if you show that they don't factual showing that as i guess is the case with home depot that its business is separate out evenly over the country so there is a particular place where if this is business specific facts on the first you have to plead you have to make the showing that the just the allegation that there is diversity it is then up to the opposing party to come in and make some representation that to dispute it there was nothing in the complaint to dispute where a principal place of business was we make the allegation that our principal place of business is in atlanta georgia and then we submit sworn testimony to the fact that our principal place of business is it is in atlanta georgia we didn't have to go  i interpret judge of terrorist standing order was if there is the spirit about your principal place of business be on notice that because of the industrial tectonics case you will have to addressed first your principal your the center of your organization your choice but it's a d and c all of the above so in this case unfortunately i respect judge adair a very much an unfortunate think we have to agree with the appellant that this case does get sent back out
moderately limited in the ability to maintain attention perform activities within a schedule maintain regular attendance be punctual within customary time assist tolerance  ignore the opinions of the commissioners on doctors and the a l j must explain the weight given to  in layman's language that he can pose to the vocational expert so using the word often in a hypothetical question for example would be inappropriate because it's a term of art for the listings under nine some of her testimony and then her doctors with respect to the depression and therefore you didn't get in your view you didn't need to put that into the hypothetical well that l j did go through and just count in the hearing decision at great length for example the opinions of dr pryce who had agreed to intercede on behalf of the claimant and often had very moderate very mild findings a fan said due to her financial stress and her social str christlike the claimant microform in the national economy and alternative stuff i think i took a lot of different limitations and a lot of different hypothetical questions but at the end of the day i think i added it up it looked like there was one hundred  fifty thousand representative jobs nationally that wouldn't involve machinery that wouldn't involve hazards that would allow us to stand options that were fundamentally sedentary jobs if you believe you can move around as needed that being so says the judge must put in its opinion a description of what the physical requirements where and what the mental requirements were for the past relevant work it doesn't matter that what's in the record here there and everywhere the ruling which is
some break in time some more us more supervised visitation you see the standard of best interests but applying with the standard on playing the  we should be supervised visitation basically this testimony his case was smoke and mirrors there is no reason why this is shit or genie should not have unsupervised visitation with your child that there has been any ongoing statements of this kind whatsoever no stands between the mother you know statements between the mother and daughter which would many ways to ingest there is then any kind of poison even with the should you know supervised visitation there were inappropriate comments made the judge referred to those inappropriate comments about you know i was out there is kevin doing this or deny her unsupervised visitation on the others there's a history in this case and then there's the child is your comments that make you feel bad that right there were anything which would justify you have the station supervise
from the specification which would suggest that you require two images however it does in each case use the word  allows your argument that the use of the word allows or the word allowing to those places is what gets you off the hook from those statements well those wrote it because they said they seem fairly strong in that  sample the first one says because the ins inertial navigation system provides fixed initial spatial position information the present invention allows the location of a point to be accurately determine from any two video and the others are along the same line and that seems to provide some fairly significant support for their position but i thought your brief you seem to focus on the word allows suggesting that this is just an option certainly should be recognised in this instance because it is the whole point of that kind of if you read that element showing out of that if you reach zero then out of the pile on the plane sixteen it might as well not be there at all the whole element serves no twenty six twenty one year span state with the presence of the location of an object is shown in at least two other recordings not group of eight or video images which were different times seem to agree that the district court didn't reach a rule of mootness and dismissed with prejudice and that in fact the decision should have been without prejudice under those circumstances so is a service on the merits and really haven't got to that point either way
states and that is what is commonly called cancellation of removal pursuant to section two forty a of the act to be eligible an alien has to establish four elements first that they have been living in the united states for more than ten years that they have qualifying united states citizen or resident alien relatives here with more of a character and that those qualifying relatives will hire more suffer a very high level of hardship if the alien is removed from the united states in this particular case this will last this was preacher emitted from applying for that important benefit defined as an assault that is not an assault one two or three there's no intent element there's no element to bodily harm the case wh  we have a rule in our court that we frequently impose that if an argument is not made in the opening brief it's waived not only was it not made it was referred to it all in the opening bri that had filed or i mean finest in that it but our rule doesn't make exceptions for new lawyers or patent lawyers or law firms or how what law school they went to we just have a rule because we can't just that immigration judge and that even though it wasn't addressed directly and often in breach of counsel she didn't directly address that issue by saying that she felt that the client was because when your honor i guess what i'm saying is that to us the courts question that even though counsel didn't directly address that issue she did address the issue by saying that it was her position that is that the titians position that she was eligible i don't believe in i don't i don't know the government is asserting that a modified approach would be applicable in this instance the only conviction court because the case for that exists i think it clearly supports that it is not a crime involving moral turpitude and therefore it is not a crime of violence and it's not a crime involving moral t that sentenced month occasion was critical not really sure eligibility for cancellation that's your eligibility for voluntary departure because the immigration judge found that it was an aggravated felony crime of violence which requires  one year or more and says that it was on the issue of on our departure the board simply said she's not barred from seeking cancellation they didn't certainly didn't say she's eligible absolutely f cancellation and there was just no consideration no discussion of the crime involving moral turpitude issue which they came back later on their in their second opinion and addressed as i think they have absolutely every right to consider to know about her sta
well wait a minute she but that as i understand it they did then there she had another so she got another counsel and in august first two thousand there was a second motion to reopen is that the b i even recognized the problem here we agree with the immigration judge the statute of limitations for filing the motion to reopen was told until december ninety eight after that date respondent should have recognized that she was the victim and was under no obligation to fire her motion to of difficulties this particular position you're faced with a council or a representative of some sort we part company you know however in the situation of how long that's holding period ran and when the clock started running and we know from  misunderstanding between herself and counsel resulted in her not appearing for her initial immigration hearing that resulted in her being removed an abstention there was a motion to file reopening the motion the real the motion was denied because the tipped someone pat to the fact that will she was never filed the clearly says the fee was never filed and she she probably should have consulted somebody at that point if we wait until april and we think if we stop if you start to fill in period then stop and then you get the filed sometime in late one nine hundred ninety nine even if we wait till the lopez occasion in july of one nine hundred ninety nine and we start the period running then we still run into early two thousand and this motion isn't filed until august of two thousand the time with the clock starts again you're still many many months late without any explanation but your answer to that well i think that i mean it wasn't just for lack of due diligence on the petitions pipe that good morning may please the court i'm
if anyone ever stopped to figure out just how many stations there are in the sea well there are more than of ever been caught anyway remember this for starters we and our neighbors on the other four faced a twenty billion pounds a year one and a half billion of steel and rawhide to do the dirty work like this on you just a harbinger open i have a bar they know your habit of spinning and falling a line when you're hooked you're no good for to gives a fisherman a run for his money the only thing you're good for is shark skin and welcome aboard the lugger well the expedition is underway again daily wondering just what the next hour will bring forth is what gives by still life you know the sitting on the spring piece of the village dock and dangling and i'm the worm on the end of a line with a  they eat their weight in face each day they're too greedy spoils fishing for the boat say there's an idea that must be good for catching one of those terrors of the deep for real sport you know there must always be that element of he's a destroyer
right of action to assume for a violation of the regulation elsewhere in the same in the neighborhood congress did in fact say if that the f c c should prescribe a regulation and if
men who are on their way to keep their dating history impetuously their delegates from boston to report first hand in massachusetts answer to the skeptics secret organization patriots we call them underground today meetings were stormy and exciting some of the colonists felt they weren't being so badly treated by standards of the old country but over here the people were beginning to breathe exhilarating air of freedom it was a new idea in the world and they like the signing of the declaration of independence making all man's free it is that when the rest of the party rolled into philadelphia and schroeder and a friendly stranger are missing and they used to have a problem of their own growing more acute by the moment ok i'll stick around dog so it is with confused emotions but mary returns to new york to her pleasant career girl routine and to waldo philadelphia to philadelphia this book to come here because there's a message here we both need but who are you anyway come to think of it i don't even know your name most a hundred years ago when he came to gettysburg did you hear that that was a message we both need a stage and not a died in vain they wonder sometimes those are gay that last full measure of devotion that the people who inherited this country are worth the sacrifice his name like the words of president harding when he dedicated the spot the name of him whose body lies who took flight with his imperishable soul we know only that his death marks sim with the everlasting glory of an american who died
they're looking for answers and the people in the home maybe are interested in your concerns as much as your fellow students would be this situation offers a possibility of looking at these problems with other students and with faculty members over we have to stab people here but this place is run by do they make the major decisions they formulate the policy this gives them a meaningful experience in life it's not some structured programs we have live drama here every saturday and sunday evening with an eight thirty curtain we do many current plays from musicals to current dramas to free tragedy we also on friday nights teenagers and about a year ago they heads of the schools in the area got together and decided that it would be a good thing if there was a facility for these kids where they could gather and and have some fun so they went to the chest and hill community association that was very sympathetic to this idea and the community association about a year ago oh maybe that right from the year ago about june pointed mr mel ehrlich who is our presently our director to see if he could get together with some kids and find out what they want to do so we got a group of about twenty kids together and they met all summer and they discussed what they wanted and decided that what they needed was a an areas where they could meet as a i'm doing is the first no that we have a good many details about to be gone into and a lot of problem solved budoy think we're pretty well on the way to having them all solved now provide a place for teenage employment center and i think it's very good for the kids because it's it's it's it's gives them a place where they can go and use their energies constructively instead of milling around with no particular purpose
related injury according to them and off he he there was no trauma there was no twisting there was no in the mechanics of injuries important to a doctor when he went in duties the general public isn't operating a standout for quit every day this is different than walking down the street or walking through the hallway of the office this is climbing line tench platform