confidence in them throughout the whole proceedings in this transaction and the legal proceedings to date as well and how they acted in bad faith st of all i'd like to focus on the dishonest way in which they behaved primarily and that was around the time of completion the the documents on sales i found that they never increased prices they actually gave discounts ranging from one point five percent to twenty three seven percent on three bedroom apartments in the building secondly they claimed in an email this is  related sales agent to around sales office that most of the three bedroom apartments were sell this was totally untrue they actually had only sold two of the three bedroom apartments eight or eighty percent remained unsolved they  seventeen because the apartment just wasn't ready in terms of the elevators public spaces gym parking storage etc related never established they were ready willing and able to close they never disclosed the liens they had on the apartment i was told that i fell to show show the money was that close they did erroneous lease a default notice in november but apologized after assuring that and then continue to negotiate an issue additional contracts which i didn't sign and actually had didn't have on those misrepresentations because there is a time lag in terms of that information coming out specifically also the arc the details about the mortgage you're on it was on a site called fact mr roach has also made a twelve day mission so there were competing twelve emotions both parties agreed that the court had all the information it needed to decide the merits of this case and judge sweet correctly decided that the parties had an airtight agreement that left no room for the defendant mr roach to to get his deposit back after he failed timely to close on his purchase of a ten million dollars apartment with storage and parking mr rogers lawyer could not documents available to mr roach before sure they were and were th highline did not suppress any evidence we responded to discovery as discovery was going forward there was no motion to compel that we had failed to comply with he was represented by counsel information about the mortgage that twenty time habits published in two to two thousand and seventeen well you know that is the problem is here for us with respect to both of your arguments i think just speaking for myself if you're saying these things and we're a court of appeals i don't know how we can say gee that's a good point or gee that isn't a good point without having found the  and twenty if mr roach had new information that he wanted to provide the district court he was free to do that was represented by counsel until april st of two thousand and twenty and there was never a hint that there was anything missing from the record because actually there wasn't so on the record that we have to sweet was absolutely correct this was eight hundred and eighty eight airtight agreement mr roach had conceded that he did not rely on any prior statement by anybody oral or written i have and you know i don't take it you personally but i just want to address you know that sort of aspersions cast on me i feel like i have to respond to point out the absolutely false statements that mr roach is making the parking rider does not provide a refund if there is not a closing the parking rider refers back to the primary agreement and says that if there is a default then the liquidated damages and all the default provisions of the agreement apply even with regard to the parking right or he complains that he was up sold and that they switched deposits but if the court looks  was a check for unit thirty three dollars this apartment twenty anti life didn't switch his deposit on him and again you know as the court pointed out mr roach famed that he had some sort of weakness and some unequal darkening power he was represented the entire time there is no basis for him to try to at this point to get out of the agreement and again i really am here t stick you know there's no need for you this isn't about you and her this is about a legal issue and your brief limits what you argue that you characterize yourself as a novice who put down two represent yourself you do so at your peril because up this is a lot of money and you're representing yourself new york is still with lawyers well i hat yana sorry i approach seven and lawyers and they will  and the last thing i would say is that we've heard today that these documents were available they simply were not they were available to related filings with the attorney general the way that apartments were closing in the discounts they were closing out they get updated i things one note jets are my quick answer my questions are did i make an application to the dist slummy finished did you make an application of the district court that there been newly discovered evidence that reflected that either that you had a valid defense and that because you're just unable to find it that the judgment should be vacated and that new evidence should be received by the court i didn't know i can even make an application very well because ok i understand what you're representing yourself yes discovery discovery was awarded and then summarily a judgment was were made without the benefit of discovery miss rice found me saying that she disclosed the financing i said checked with kail discovery who did the disclosure and they did not disclose the mortgages in discovery if you look at the transcript of the hearing with judge three or he talks about other any complications in terms of liens on this apartment anything i should know she changes the subject she dodges the issue how could she not know and how to relate that nazi friend that's telling and i carry with you it's a huge amount of money this was a family home for my husband tonight long in new york it's a lot of money i worked very hard for it that's what you do i still work very hard he this this was a lot of money but in terms of discovery it did not disclose the details they showed and i feel very bad that we could have avoided all of this issue just stepped up to the plate or