house there she kept a low slung around louisville slugger in her carriage that wasn't there and they think that that's what hit him because to force it was hit this guy in the head was very extreme i don't think that i know i know i don't know behavior should have been watched more closely i'm saying if they were all cut off and they were all trained in this the facts are in dispute about how much they were treating somewhere between your business tonight you're out of here so they believe mr holder hasn't been up hasn't been drinking a lot in the bar he hasn't been out you know outstanding in terms of contacts he hasn't been o wages yes we really don't know much about it but now they're thrown out and they go out into the parking lot is it just it's reasonable to believe that after being thrown out they would be angry and they could wait in the problem they know they had a problem want security somewhere in the facility the security you need to to convert your circumstance to call your superiors you would need security everyplace on th communication or interaction between the plaintiff and mr perry occurred in this breezeway only view from anyone and mr hanna's conduct before that none of it indicated that a fight was imminent or going to leave her in mr hand if there was bar watch what they were sure in the fall when they perceive that somebody has been served too much they cut them off they warn them when they observe their conduct to be here perhaps out of line and they told me to do this again or you keep this up you're going to be kicked out that's traffic yes like it cheers me up now quite happy evidently not but the hannah group was not part of the regular clientele was it they were no extra security even to the kind of the bar i don't think the record is any worse certainly not worse than davis versus all the ins or davis versus amelia where there seemed to be in davis there was four fights and ninety days  there was five holes of police in six months including a big brawl that happened just a month before the accident we have nothing of the sort the record of it contains you know responses the police made to the way some tap over the period of years there's testimony to the facts it gets and if yes it is good most of the law which i believe it is we don't approach it and beyond that it goes to be the underlying general nature of of it in this area which is unless you have a specific reason to know that a fight is imminent or going to be occurring or that a particular person is problematic there's no duty to it that it doesn't exist the reasonable for c believe the likelihood of the harm just isn't there the as davis iraqis all hands who was the perpetrator he had he was intoxicated he gave the bartender the middle finger he threw his wallet at the bartender he became louder than notches at the pool table served using profane language all  those things all those facts were at issue in davis and the court said even if it goes fast absent something else there is no duty and so to your honor's question more to answer that more directly assuming that mr hannah knock it off and then it was monitored i think the court can rest assured that the trial court made the correct decision here and that is not one for the jury to decide based on hindsight it's a question of one for the court to decide whether the conduct of the facts  go with it but you don't have to if you think it was rotting decided i think it's really decided they had to go to trial so i don't know if there had been a summary judgment but it is different and will smith with it went to trial the facts were all the