course the cook county board is approximately forty miles from the accident scene as opposed to fourteen miles between the accident scene and the king county morgue and nothing that would ever lose a port city from actually allowing  that's cracked and the circuit court here however did not evaluate that factor correctly because the circuit court here side it's not necessary to have a jury deal that's not the standard it's whether or not it's possible the board also we sat out in our brief the circuit court did not consider the allegations with respect to nash and this conduct the son his sight lines from the law clay and also geography with respect to the signage william sheaffer testified that some signs on the left lane could not be placed because there wasn't enough room on the shoulder or the bridge those things are still there and those would be kind to worsen geography of the accident scene that could be very important for a jury to see that's up to the trial judge here the circuit judge said absolutely this is not necessary that was an abuse of discretion it's possible that a trial judge for all these reasons may watch the jury to see this and why is it in use of discretion just simply because he said motion and he should have looked at the possibility not what he would have deemed to be in the subsidy were he the trial judge that the second most important factor in the four of nine convenience analysis on the public interest side of course is the location of the accident and you know our supreme court has made very clear that no county has a greater interest in any litigation than that where the accident occurred that  versus illinois power company it is cited are free but certainly that's not the only reason as we discussed in our brief there are other problems with the circuit courts analysis this circuit courts reliance on the location of airports in david's of various people saying it would or would not be convenient for them to toss to fi and cook or king county those are not sufficient affidavits they simply having the name and the statement it would be convenient for me to go to cook county and  and all the it seems that there are questions about like that standard means it still is the standard that is for it yes look yes yes yes we do understand that information from both sides extensive motion sick sense of qana motions replies by other surveys fifteen page single spaced a decision in which the judge tried to examine all of the relevant factors and the telling and the ver this is not simply an auto accident like inhaler or just or it's a very complex matter that involves how this roadway in cook county was set up all the testimony was that the decisions were made in cook county that that the thought have a connection to cook county because you can get an interest in safety at its airport well here cook county has an interest of safety all the way from o'hare out to wherever it is county line is that brings this case within this  of none of these counties is greater than that of the county where the accident occurred so i think clearly that makes plain that the site of the accident is a critically important question with respect to code so much of the complexity of the matter and that that is an important factor and it implicates one of the other public interest factors in the ties which is the imposition of imposing jury duty  taxpayers and residents of the county with very little connection to the accident in this case we have the six passenger plaintiffs twenty four defendants including mr nash fact discovery has been ongoing during the pendency of all one hundred depositions have been taken and there was their testimony or some suggestion though that the construction had to do with certain things that were decided in county there plaintiff's argument is that there was there were some but again it as i was saying there are we still have twenty to thirty more fact depositions to go the absolute testimony in this case is going to be very long and very complex the expert discovery excuse me this ship the trial this case could easily take six to eight weeks mine convenience analysis always has come back to this accident and this accident happened in king county and involves only wisconsin residents so yes that maybe that's a factor the court should look at is it a controlling or just as if factor absolutely not we have to look at this accident and here there were no cook county residents involved whatsoever and my final point just scored in the cases that we have  and the convenience and the business activities are at pages twenty nine through thirty of our of our period and that would be sus named and bruce for the chairman so all right thank you thank