MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
in blue or at county south of main kato at prairie pride farms for five generations the hummer family have been raising berkshire hogs free range chickens and growing crops on their century old farm i'm jill jones with us p n and  this episode of market we're going to find out how they raise their award winning pork no other food available and that's what really makes a good helping in the grocery store you see cage bring free reign but that doesn't necessarily mean that they go outside what really makes a good healthy egg to raise we actually grind their own feed with the corn and so we know exactly what's in it you know no am on you know no animal by products so all we know is a good healthy feed that they're going to really thrive on with chickens you've got to have a dry clean pan you know but they're not overly crowded you know i met them in the main key you don't want to have things crowded so they don't have that stress right there you know over for em plenty  around on them and you know it you know the animals are kind of like people you know in a certain certain animals get along really well together and certain people get along well and then sometimes they don't get along so well so you need to have that separation kind of work together you know the system what's going on very well this is our compost pile and what we do and take them in your inside the chicken hall and we pile it up here and then we let a decomposing and makes wonderful dirt you know it's all after about three years and now we're able to use that put that back on the field again or we also give it to garner that are in sync claire so this is part of the but we always thought the consumer one flavor and we go see some of your other yeah let's go see some more pig so you showed us the breeding hogs and what's the status of the operation all this finishing barn and then we put them in small groups here and they have feed you know that we grow on our farm they have sunlight and water who all feel comfortable environment should we go  this is what we grow and in order to make our feed for our pigs let's go into my office of our products this way we know this is just such a busy time of year for all of you so we really want to say thank you and tell you we appreciate you letting us come out here to really witness the pat passion and dedication that you put into raising your hogs and chickens in the crop so thank you so much well you're welcome we really enjoy your life on here we really enjoy meeting the customers that the farmer's market in talking to people all over the united
flight yesterday be nice just to do this over time yeah i think so duke is going to be been arrested to see different segments of different murals being made yeah and this is the famished product that's how the sign looks after
this case the issue on appeal raised by mr mightiness as you well know is whether the trial court heard in failing to grant mr martinez his motion to had a hard decision to make does he take to fifteen to serve which is five years off the statutory mandatory minimum or does he go to trial and it's twenty or nothing i think hard call and he went back and forth vacillated i can't see any reason for his withdrawal of his change of plea except a change of mind on whether to gamble on that twenty or nothing is there some other cause of the qualifiers good cause that he was confused that he didn't he really was not a participant that he felt there wasn't an adequate objection in the p s i that he was only present as an interpreter he did make the allegation that his counsel had spent little time with him at one of his allegations is not in fact correct that his counsel had batch file any motions on his behalf i simply think that he felt he had not been fairly and there isn't a sufficient record to legitimize what his complaint was but the overall picture of ineffective assistance of counsel i know that's a conclusion but he base that on in his presentation to sentencing really i was not in fact i think at that third counsel at this point and first counsel on appeal that there was a a conflict of interest between the initial counsel that there would still be a possibility of filing a hades petition yes your honor in fact that's even in the plea agreement and quite frankly i wanted to go ahead and try to distinguish the high case  hyde case lead so far as to limit itself from what i understood to a tight plea and that was andrew a circumstance where the defendant in fact it missions that he had committed the crime contrary to mr martinez who says he was coerced and he was is he was only in our interpreter and that his defense counsel  that's the part that gave me a hard time actually his lawyer says but i think he's concerned and it's a change of mind as much as anything else and then the defendant himself says it's working as well pretty much me and my attorney because between eighty eight and ninety five there are a little clearer reasons excuse for mr martinez perspective as to what his concern
your argument as to why the government has to reintroduce the same documents that are already in the record without the jackson five well there were documents that were introduced four years ago during that time period of many document that they still have the burden to prove up the charges in that document under the regulation the charges are established by the national documents and there's absolutely nothing in the record the record just for the immigration let's settle that issue first before we go through i'm in the field i see well the record that was before the immigration judge our position has always been that current document is the order to show cause for conviction records are completely separate issues now so why you or your confusing while the conviction documents all the documents that are used to prove up the offense but the b i a also focused on the fact that this was a crime of violence you didn't respond to that at all in fact a crime of violence reasoning and ruling in an independently even if there were no firearm the decision of the cia which which to me at least is is very unclear because of this economy and the and the a and reference matter of blake as a general proposition with the immigration judge who that that the documents that were there were adequate and then we're just talking about what constitutes the b i a says in addition to the firearm offense this been substantiated it's also a crime of  violence and a crime of violence in and of itself makes your client eligible for the relief you see it if for a moment just first discussion purposes let's assume that the vi a set satisfy your standard for reasoning about is that you can look back half of a crime that was committed prior to the various congressional changes and the question is whether or not a crime of
there but the question is is the substantial evidence supporting me l j or the table to provide him with facts that probably did go back to the doctor says he didn't have any problem i mean walking there's also medical evidence of difficulty walking from doctor where time or even that was faster believe the l g a should have then asked the sixty four thousand dollar questions how long smith could walk at one time how long he could walk total in an eight hour day for why there's no requirement for contemporaneous medical evidence we're relying on the i contradicted medical evidence from march one thousand nine hundred three at that point in time he had moderate degenerative arthritis in his right knee and that would not  and there was a discussion that he had some troubles walking there were are no more medical evidence there's no medical records to to obtain the questions were asked by the l j asking him what is limitations or what his health problems were and there's no more development that could be down at this point
friends i want them johnson superintendent of schools of the city of new york the film you're about to see close the story of how the schools and community in one school districts are working together to build brotherhood their intervention station program involves children and adults of different racial and cultural backgrounds this partnerships of all races creeds and colors has made an entire school community a happier place in which to work and among you can give some of the reasons why people left their native land to come to the united states of america it's many came because they wanted to be free to worship as  came because they wanted to get away from the tyranny and cruelty of pigs it's my people are free now they are proud to be americans but the negroes were brought it is hard to run the city or a nation into unit dates when its people come from so many different backgrounds every nation has a town customs habits drafts am a member of the community committee of school district twelve thirteen and fourteen our community committee is dedicated to the ideal that all men are brothers peoples of more than fifty nationalities of every race color creed live in our area ratio and national background to understanding among the adults we hope to reduce prejudice and hostilit we principals know that most schools in new york city are representative of a cross section of its population for the year to visitation program however we must play in two pairs schools warehousing and other factors have tended to separate people on the basis of race or nation of origin we must help these children and parents to build friendships with people in other communities program began with to school the next year for schools participated the following year ten now fourteen schools are in for visiting in every case parents met to discuss the project i believe everyone is all right but what about the social implications of all this mixing children together why should i make my child believe that he's going to be accepted when i know that when he grows up he's going to be a i might if work there is a feeling by letting him live with it so now and help him later not to be hurt too much and benefits were of you some children suffered mild anxiety lens and they had never known a child of another race do  girls from harlem were like me she asked her mother rollitt had never visited outside his own area when he heard that he was to make children in a guy find your pen pals with blig
before he w low when the defendant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea the only thing he raised was that his attorney coerced into pleading guilty so the rule eleven violations must be reviewed by this court under the plane air standard live on case we don't believe that the fence has need that showing on the record is very clear with respect to the fact that the court did have a factual basis for the fleet that the court implies the defendant of the elements of the offense the judge read the charge which was a very simple straightforward charge of the contained the intentional knowing requirement the court then asked me to explain the elements which i did in accordance with the ninth circuit on model jury instructions and she asked the defendant specifically do you understand this charge and and the question that the judge cited yes he did she explained it to him i then went through a very lengthy explanation of what we felt the evidence would show in this case and the defendant specifically said that there was nothing he disagreed with there and then when the court turned to him and asked him to explain he sent on more than one occasion that he was going to get the drugs help break and so on he said that on one to three occasions and ironically in the motion to withdraw guilty plea when he took the stand he also repeated that basically that was what he was going to do so there's absolutely nothing in this record that shows that the basic fairness of these proceedings which is what they would have to show on had been violated in this case and if the court has any other questions on any other issues i'd be happy to address your benign thank you thank you
i'm a real estate broker and also work more manager when the economy went down so i thought oh reinventing my wretched me my qualification so i have no time to go to school so i thought of attending an online class my intention was to understand a lot so  need to attend because i got the information that washington d c allows student who finished their online degree then i attended snow was university online and then the interviewers were informed that the university or college is in california i graduated in twenty that they clearly attended all here in the united states and i was fourteen years in the united states when i attended toral in generally twenty one twenty eleven daniel derby and susan thompson is scheduled interview i told both interviewers about my educational qualification and that they clearly indicated that no which school has an office in california the phone and address were provided to the interviewers and gleaned from the document faxed to them derby and thomas and personally handed me since i've had a matter pending before the second circuit and i thank the pound in this court for the opportunity to again be appear before it turning to the merits of the district court's memorandum and an order was well articulated and soundly reason and it's supplemented by our brief demonstrating that there is no basis to appellants arguments for this for these reasons the district court's decision should be affirmed and if there are no questions that rest on my thank you you'll get something mr salvatore and you'll get something from us in writing thank you
governor president of the united states stop this year when i won the right to work in factories it is still very much a man's world women are finally working outside the home are fast becoming an ever increasing part of our labor  thousand for it was running for re election against judge walton the progress of new york roosevelt had compiled an impressive record during his first administration had broken the big business it was responsible for legislation controlling railroad a speech to the nation he repeated the issues of the day and outlined the progressive legislation for which he would buy roosevelt was a man of great determination and got a few of his letters doubted he would accomplish what he set out to do here we see the west point cadets then then as now the best trained military group in the entire world after the parade there was a reception at which the roughriders were present to be greeted personally by the president and  in another four years under the guidance of t r probably the most enduring monument to his memory the rules about them and arrows on it was the first president to take steps to conserve our natural resources he set aside vast mineral and for preserve the acquired government water rights and otherwise pride to protect our land against wasted and exploitation that's great them will ever keep its memory fresh in the minds and hearts of our people
the who friend i want him johnson superintendent of schools of the city of new york the film you're about to see tells the story of how the schools and community in one school districts are working together to build brotherhood it's their intervention taishan program involves children and adults of different racial and cultural backgrounds this partnerships of all races creeds and colors has made an entire school community a happier place in which to work and s because they wanted to get away from the caring and of king my people are free now they are proud to be american but the my father's wanting what he wanted to give me and my brother a good education it is hard to run the city or a nation into unit dates when its people come from so many different backgrounds every night and as its sound comes from habit grants am a member of the community committee of school district twelve thirteen and fourteen our community committee is dedicated to the ideal that all men are brothers peoples of more than fifty nationalities of every race color creed live in our area there was a job but the citizens and teachers to work on together to cut down the right show social and economic barriers but divide  school board members social worker and librarian clergymen of many denominations hundred fifty two the council a president of parents association cooperated enthusiastic i lay in the proposed program ratio and national background to understanding among the we hope to reduce prejudice and hostilit we principals know that most schools in new york city are representative of a cross section of its population for the year to visitation program however we most plan to pair schools warehousing and other factors have tended to separate people on the basis of race or nation of origin we must help these children and parents to build friendships with people in other communities program began with to school the next year for schools participated the following year ten now fourteen schools are into visitor it's in every case parents met to discuss the project i believe everyone is all right but what about the social implications of all this maxing children together why should i make my child believe that he is going to be accepted when i know that when he grows up he's going to be a i might it were very appealing by letting him live with it so now and help him later not to be hurt too much girls from harlem were like me she asked her mother had never visited children outside his own area when he heard that he was to make children in a to become pen pals the buddies corresponded and exchanged prompted bra
or the language of controlled substance a counterfeit substance or a simulated substance applies to all of those that's one element controlled substance kind of a substance or simulated substance is  course read their offenses which is that it can be a controlled substance or fit and as long as as you know twelve jurors say one of those that's the one element that they need i think i've reserved two minutes yes may please the court counsel money and and recall ominous just a u s attorney in the southern district of iowa and i represent the united states in this appeal there is no question that the defendant had prior convictions for one delivery of methamphetamine and two possession of that but but respond to opposing counsel argument for which i didn't fully follow but i want to i want to see what the response is on it in looking at ford i think it's important to look at the specific subsections of the i will code  the and if we do that that demonstrates why these are elements and means the delivery of methamphetamine in this case of the delivery of methamphetamine involving more than five it relied upon frigidly in the district court had to do with the definition of felony drug offender under title twenty one but when we got the same case back in round two and  brown two i believe was at back under the career under guideline the fact that it was a simulated controlled substance did not make it that make a difference must the panel have whether it's controlled or counterfeit or simulate it it doesn't matter it does not change how it's punished it doesn't change the elements that the state needs to prove it doesn't these are just various factual means of getting to that one place which is we need something involving a controlled substance whether it's simulated actual or counterfeit so i guess that would be my argument why that portion of the statute is not devise a bill unless there are any questions
very clear she wanted to impose the same standards imposed before and she got her mathematics make stop and in later proceedings she made it very clear that she intended the that at the very beginning of the hearing but then there are that's followed by a whole discussion where the defense raises well judged when you think about all the time you spent in the halfway house with that have changed your difference and that was an issue that was a race in the papers they brought that up for the first time of the hearing sentence in this case the court does have to remain back there is an error in the in the supervised release it should be one year rather than three years and we all we all agree to that let's you have any further questions i nothing further now i would they had seven days to correct this the government could have come a little while thirty five and said hey judge they could have even stood up that day and said judge what you just said doesn't make sense would you please clarify what you're saying the government didn't object nobody said i don't think they nobody thought it was a big us and nobody saw any reason to do anything further that's about it
the judge in the tourney both intentionally and the league criminally decided to leave my legal documents off the dock you see any reasonable thinking person not only of these defendants goji but this has been a complete conspiracy against me it is well documented that it to all ninety m f chief terry vol illegally discriminated against me by not hiring the at the meeting i had with him stating that foreman jewellers said east sally stated to me kennesaw that we did not hire you because you think you have malcolm x around here yes everyone loves your work but not your opinions mr vote is stated to me i can assure you it is what it is i mean and he was ok with the discrimination the history of the v a employee brought up on charges which transferred the next day at the his next day at away from his union and without an investigation so like everything else in this every word out of her mouth was alive she stated on the witness stand as she had no knowledge of any e o activity of mind before many a decision to remove me from service at that if you refuse to settle by signing last  receive in his decision in this case is so disturbing an inhumane on every legal leve thank you thank you thank you abused a cancer patient was supported by substantial evidence including shaw's own testimony the board also reasonably held that the v a s mission of providing quality health care to veterans is disrupted when staff verbally abuse patients and the board acted within its discretion when it mitigated shaw's punishment from terminations to a thirty day suspension just title seven claims also fail even when they are assumed true shaw's factual allegations do not plausibly suggest th disciplined him because of his religion or because of his prior ego activity instead the obvious explanation here is that the v a disciplined shaw for his profane outburst for these reasons unless the court has further questions  the government will rest on its papers thank you thank you both for your arguments the court will reserve decision