dollars range they were not would have to be ended up being the highest in the whole bed to avoid the slow tedious process as the banks attorney e mailed everyone and told them how their client submitted bids by the next day to her office this was really designed to get everyone's highest and best offer james torrance my client submitted a specific been a forty one thousand one hundred dollars a substantial sum higher than the original discussions where parties were talking about what they would offer it was designed to be their highest and best offer william went did not bid a specific amount his bid was three thousand five hundred dollars over the next highest offer submitted by the bidding deadline after the bidding deadline  says it has to be fear an act would have all was well supported my argument is i think they're never commercially reasonable for all the reasons i stated that the webster case and other cases have sat because basically it makes one person do all the work is to figure out how much it's worth and the other person just says i'll bet a dollar more a little bit more this was more than a dollar certainly but it was just a little bit more based on the size of the bid it wasn't even quite ten percent our other argument is that it is not fair and accurate at all which is actually the provide the bill say on all the documents to show that they were in the meeting better because no reported sale even to this day isn't filed with the court and those documents are provided upon receiving them jane torrance filed a motion from to the court to is asking this court to find that william once did three thousand five hundred dollars over the next highest bid was really no bit at all and that the court should declare james torrance having two hundred dollars the highest the civic bit of forty one thousand one hundred size already knows what my client's highest and best bid there's no way to unredeemed that now my clients are going to have decide whether they want to offer someone substantially more at some kind of open auction but mr went now knows what my clients probably willing to come up with maybe only a little more and he can be prepared not to come up with what he thinks is worth and say hey i'm going to start bidding at fifty thousand dollars thank you if there's no other questions i would just like reserve my time for a vote on the other things panel this offer from the tree museum for about ten thousand dollars they fielded an offer from office on that for about that amount and eventually counsel for the bank said in order to streamline this process and avoid a lengthy process given your past are we depend on the cultural context your honor and that's where these cases cited by on respondent both wives of the french and the three additional cases provide context that is very important distinguish and that is one these were those options permitted the government to reject any bed and it was decided on nappies and here there is no instruction there was no follow there is no legislative act that was not followed and so there is no foundation for respond sad is that figuring out the highest amounts number scrushy every issue was a matter of numbers and if you look at what your verses french it said you can't count an x over bid as part of numbers you have to count the forty one thousand one hundred in my situation as the highest bid that is how you calculate the numbers there is no discretion here for the governor to say what the highest number is the supreme court said the highest number is the highest specific bit if we  that to the bank here the bank has the same problem if the bank has the discretion if it has this duty that is for half his size to get the highest number the highest actual bid webster vs french says there's no discretion in that it's the high specific was using and how they treated those beds so this was not just for the statutory issue this bank's discretion actually goes against web jurisich front but i think it's more than that i think that you have to think about the fact that sold why should we have to have the auctioneer sell a priceless piece of jewelry when some ask her auction house lloyd's of london could sell it for much more money when you have those types of situations there was that or the legislature thought if we could do it in a different way but then they said it has to be very happy with a bill it didn't say commercially reasonable it's a fear an equitable it is unfair inequitable for the banks to just decide who's going to be the to never tell them and for the hot video who didn't win to only find out when they were presented with a bill of sale from who claims to be the highest bidder there were many times by james torrance to find out who was the highest bidder