MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
williams along with craig spinelli our acting general manager so before we get started i want to give the first announcement which is the belmont drives electric dot org electric vehicle ride and drive event which is going to be done in  partnership with bethel temple center climate team to participate in the next easy information in test drive a vent on sunday october twenty ninth and twelve till three pm at the general middle school ninety five washington street at noon there's an information session owners with reviews available to check out and test drive you can email belmont drives electric add g mail dot com to pre register or just show up which i've done and they did let me drive your chance to experience and compared today's modern evey's and plug in hybrids at the same time to if you had anything about what other towns did with their life boards and how they whether they elected or appointed them and all that and he provided us with a chart of that which actually is as far as as task  to do and i would prefer to not i don't think the problem i guess i look at is sort of whether it's the numbers like going or anything it's sort of what's the problem you're trying to solve and does the solution actually solve the problem  there that many people you know i'm not really sure milieu with that i will say i mean this is turning things around a little bit the whole five seems like a very low number to me so steve and and roger cohen sure the energy committee to sort of come in also with greg about putting together some sort of ideas for how the light department could work towards the town's climate action plan goals plan i think there is more of to investigate and possibly to implement so i think that's an area we can go forward in the i do agree that we need to figure out how we're going to get to the climate action plan goals and certainly belmont were having a meeting on thursday with energy new england there are they people that help us put together or put together our energy per folio look for options in terms of what we can contract with in th yeah well we will see how much information we can gather i mean some of these contracts are confidential so i that's been an issue before but we will see how much would you know department but it's the transportation is you know transportation contributes to carbon emissions you know it gas and oil and petroleum use heating oil use contributes to it so there's a lot of things here and i think we need to look a little bit to the energy committee to try to get a little bit more of a handle on who who is responsible for what what are the what is the data that we have now because i don't believe that it's going to be belmont li
second one is off the mark as well good for  wes what it looks like we'll go back to the starting f she two steps back from the free throw line just off the mark the they will stay here for westwood see what kind of pl
on the street and do five hundred miles on the other side of the street their imagination and knowledge automatically  anything to say about this deal has gone through they could ask questions but they had no input as to whether or not to actually if they had anything to say that they could possibly stop  one could argue with that one through the trial judge's mind however the regional concept of cars cannot be decided by a specific on site drilling over a three inch diameter t station is great but we have to look to the evidence here so tell us why the trial court's ruling was against the manifest weight of the evidence that's really you know didn't burn in here who do not consider any of the statutory and perhaps there is a nightmare on how to calculate the setbacks we certainly argue safety first and that requires that person to live in this area and their health and welfare is paramount the container rings and the statues and regulations are fairly technical when it gets to that point however the basic result of the construction of the stage in the regulations is that there is a protocol of why should they have been given precedence over the evidence but the primary reason is that the evidence that we brought forward through our experts say specific evidence including the initial happened at trial was and i think we made this pretty plain on the record that mr paine on was underfunded helnwein so with the holmes group and trying to make a generalized characterization which was not well founded in science that the the
and i didn't pull over what are you talking about the reception committee awaiting me outside what did you do start a revolution over there something just minded my own business and then what's all the excitement about songs and i'll be mighty lucky if i get rid of the foolish thing well as it is a very valuable i wouldn't say so but i won't bre easily until i deliver it to him is there anything i can do for you you can come along with me on a night like  and i have been all the time and didn't know it where else can i go smile now you would rather i would cry please let's be serious i know you're going to think i'm crazy but then things really do happen like this something i mean to keep that fact off of my brain now what were you doing in this room that night i think i've already told you not haven't i well i'm not happy i'm not to believe it you are trying to make your get away because you did not take them into your confidence the impunity alive you have been watching every minute of the day and night don't you think i know why you are here you you can come along with me and i'll take it down to the joint and i'll let you think for yourself i will go with you this is the neighborhood that this guy's been hanging for the last three days i've been what's the matter you know what's the matter to tell me everything very excellent teacher madam pop
and in the process of getting out of his trial he claims he goes into a three point stance which is required by the railroad in other words you have to have two hands out he just can't pull stepping off of a truck and encompassing opinion did not look at ignore the federal law cited to the federal law recognize that lesson burden of proof that exist in an f t l of a case and it very si on a rock crossing is injury that's the only issue she stated it's simply and that's all that there's no other issue here there's no claim of a hole in the ground there's no claim of the a procedure is were bad there was no there's no testimony here today at effect though mister when the whole issue came up in his deposition where he initially said well you know why the question what happened he says well i said was well it had to be because my foot didn't come down for that he never said that so that's not part of the evidence of a perception like that is not part of the evidence and then the question is it well did you see after and you know you seeing right there around where he stepped out and for  than an absence of this right we don't have you know what we don't know negligence we don't know causation we've got a person that simply says step counting enjoy himself and that's not part of right but look i think it's important to point out that the point it is internally inconsistent with what he said but who are buying our argument is that there is no effect on the other side ruling to that you know that there's no expert testimony here that says in order to have this kind of a tendon injury after all they are twisting your foot or leg that's something see you this is your read that he had this very injury that he had couldn't peaceably my stepping down i think things like that you happen to people all the time you have a weak tenderness been building up over years and years and years and you step made so i was talking about some additional statements of mr i read is for all his treating physicians it's all in our brief of course but depositions were taken seemed to ever express that well an injury couldn't happen that way because i think they think an injury certainly can't happen that way so poles that are out there in the yard all over the place but he never said he stepped in one and sold the court held that that speculation just like the speculation here that i must have stopped all right because my foot didn't come down flat it just doesn't just doesn't cut it so in the end yes if you read the facts showing that an injury occurred and was the result  negligence of the railroad yes if there is any evidence here none no evidence exists that says the bottom line no evidence exists no one ever get eyes on this right so no risk in that judgement here for thank you so
nowhere sold thank you all is well who s pose now the eyes have it the vote now comes on the always out tried our dear friends in the senate this is on reporting the bill as amend any member wish to change his or her vote
we are applying facts to whether or not a firefighter police officer entitle to this building pension that is a question of fact as such and then if a manifest weight the evidence standard applies i didn't manifest weight evidence standard contributed to his disability in addition the pension were also weighed testimony of firefighter drugs in which he testified that he crawled on his hands and knees over one thousand dollars times as a firefighter for the city of  question we maintain that the other pension boy did not care or abuse its discretion with respect to denying the city intervention in fact when reading the record in its entirety i think you'll find that the city in some sense rubber and i think that's directly on point with the sticky case in which the court commented hey the city had the opportunity to make an offer prove they didn't do that and who therefore they were or they city cannot say what we would have done differently if we were given the right process there and they were given every opportunity to say this is what we're going to cross examine on and that they should work fully accepted that it's a city submitted and considered
and my history with the companies i started out as a dishwasher and back in one nine hundred ninety five that direction it's been open since eighty nine and basically i've been working from a dishwasher moved from it and we'd be very very successful recently we open another location on the body year and a half ago and basically for me i want to give the same opportunity to that i had to become a part owner to some of luckily we you know we found this great location used to be a burger king and hopefully now we can provide really good food and i really did i just was fearful for not only the locals but the print attorney says well yeah basically you know the proposed really is just stuff form that we can protect the outside area and keep a little barrier between you know the activities that are actually going on if you guys know last time and specially that part of years just to protect and make sure people understand it that's part of their rationale and not enable for people just to step right over it will sit on the curb and doing things like that so hopefully you guys approve or  tition and if you have any questions or any comments we're here to answer anything and yeah we can wait to be part of the community help black hand out come even better at town especially that side of from coming in and then they'll just have our understanding that that's a private property so good things not at the moment
but the fellow colleagues to be working at the fish market for many many years so with that progression we decided that we needed to take one more step forward and we decided to open  you know we found this great location to use to be a burger king and hopefully now we can provide really good food and have really good i tunes fear for not only the locals but the fraternity says well yeah basically you know the if you have any questions or any comments we're here answer anything and yeah we can't wait to be part of the community come help black i don't come even better town especially that side of  not going to have to keep people from coming in and then they'll just how about understanding that that's a private property so it's not at the moment company do that for us but i know the landlord and that's probably going come back for a second face on that project but i don't know exactly what the
and my history with the company so i started there is a dishwasher and back teen one nine hundred ninety five direction it's been open since eighty nine and basically i've been working from a dishwasher moved from it and we'd be very very successful recently we open another location on the body year and a half ago and basically for me i want to give the same opportunity to that i had to become a part owner to some of luckily we you know we found this great location used to be a burger king and hopefully now we can provide really good food and i really did i just was fearful for not only the locals but the print attorney says well yeah basically you know the proposed really is just stuff form that we can protect the outside area and keep a little barrier between you know the activities that are actually going on if you guys know last time and specially that part of town there is a lot of activity and you know we've been working on this project for about a year and it's being you know several times where we come in there's people sleeping party on the ground and then tition and if you have any questions or any comments we're here to answer anything and yeah we can wait to be part of the community help black hina become even better at town especially that side of from coming in and then they will just have an understanding that that's a private property so good oh not at the moment
you as a matter of fact people versus
you you can take
but i do know it's not unusual term but it had a hash of significance because it was recorded and they didn't know it was going to be recorded and surely they and the real estate broker had a duty to disclose that fact because in fact we'll never the primary responsibility rested with the source of that real estate who were well aware of that letter and should have disclosed it before the contract was signed and i think it absolute disgrace that they would keep something like that a secret and suit and it was one of those things where i wanted you more house within the flight paths of the airplanes and now you're claiming it's a nuisance and there are there are certain aspects of public improvements like roads sewers and so on that i'm not sure are in the material unless they encroach upon the property was this a situation where when the enlarged to the road from two to four late by that it's not too late you say it's too late and it is too late to avoid any consequences but it's not too late to just next the deal i mean they could have just said hey we're not buying it if that's the case the time the seller signed the contract they do they could not deliver did a closer to my recollection is this abstract principle of law that says sat upon the execution and i thought you meant that you basically were waving those things which supposedly you knew about so the point is that if you knew about it and appreciate is that there's an exception that you felt shouldn't have been in the title court then how can you claim that after accepting the deed you now can go back and say you breached it because there is this exception which supposedly how how can it be concealed if paragraph sixteen you know rapes that there shall be no exceptions and this is an exception which you claim is a breach it almost seems like  contradiction close his or her eyes to available information and that actually if you did in the documents we've opened the door to all kinds of different disputes where the sellers would have to always disclose their voters from where they're going to was their duty under the law real estate brokers have a duty to disclose information of which they have actual knowledge that is material facts which have actually and ten because there are many different there are several elements of fraud one of which is reasonable reliance that's a separate element for that you do your intent reasonable reliance its own element so regardless of and this document appeared on the public record right but moving right different what if putting in the parkway next door affects the value of the home well that then we're back again you're saying that the possibility of the work was disclosed whether or not my clients knew about
am david the brutes and to dig a we are celebrating the amazing career of chuck jones this is steal the show where everything is in the public domain i gotta tell you check jones man one of my favorite breed you remember wiley coyote the road runner remember that that was basically his doing that he had a unique form of art that for me it's what i think when i see a cartoon by chuck jones i know it's him i can just tell by the face and some of you who you know who may not have ever seen a road runner cartoon i can't imagine that there's anybody watching that the way i haven't but how about the grinch that stole christmas porky pig but he also worked for m g m on the on the tom tom and jerry show that was a cat in the mouth and some of those tom and jerry cartoons were so inventive so clever ago and he just died in two thousand and two we are sorely going to miss this amazing talent hopefully there's a lot more talent just as good as chuck jones out there i'm sure there are if you have any talent or if you need inspiration enjoy the next three cartoons by chuck jones and i just hope that will inspire you to bring out your very best even if you just doodle ok enjoy these masterpieces by chuck jones i'm dave in the brits one well this is it getting me breakfast i live here i hope and it is oh how do you grading and don't forget the gravy i stopped e got plans oh and here's your reward my good dog
business all his life small family business depending upon the time of year it goes from two or three employees to no more than ten during the spring and summer when his  to what i'm sure your homeowners have heard a comprehensive journal liability policy i have one for my business one of the unique things about a comprehensive general liability policy is it normally has fourteen to twenty according to the florist mutual insurance company with martin has provided what the statute requires and the statute your honor i think is the key to this case because if you look at all the cases license and then if i could answer your own question mr mr felt that he was insured for anything that happened that went wrong as long as he was following or his employment was falling  be developed i think some of the most important questions that need to be answered can be answered from the insurance agent from the application to the insurers and also testimony from the director of the department of commercial applicator is part of his application his or her application would i post a bond and probably go to an insurance company to get the bomb or file a certificate of my realty insurance with the yes but in this instance we have an individual an easier posting a bond that he will personally be financially responsible for or buy liability insurance and that certificate of liability insurance has to be inspected by the department of agriculture and then whether or not he meets that department's requirements and the statute requirements he or she is issued commercial applicators wise so in other words customers whole and basically what the statute suggests is that any damage or any personal injury that is caused by the application of these pesticides nges the overall picture i think that the insurance company and the insured are bound by the statute and they cannot pilot the terms of the statute so when i say strict liability i say any damage either to an individual or to property up to the limitations are what the statute provides as far as my financial limitations are concerned so if you think that this exclusion and the reasonable belief exclusions because he didn't specifically say you have to cover everything even though the memories of those insurance rules it's designed to protect the public just like these are  an individual personal injury or to their property he decided to purchase the insurance co liability insurance and to limit his risk so if herbicide which we believe is now covered by the statute and the right and the driver actually takes the pollutant exceptions out of the policy and if you follow that raster haiti if you if you get if you put it into the factional circumstance of a small town in a small county where he has a certain number of customers who  for the mining good of his business if he damages those customers his business and i understand that but i guess we can't apply a lot differently in small town families here in chicago or can
herself to inconvenience and expense in order to drive her thirteen hours from georgia to chicago just to be a mandatory arbitration person she rather than have time to do that for this unexpected snowstorm in late march counsel did present evidence that we had a ninety six submission as well as a direct examination of the defendant in her case in chief as well as the presentation of opening and closing arguments any conclusion that we ask in this matter is
so we might be able to offer that we have by prejudice on that but then we have the motion to reconsider and there's no findings or any indication whatever of which standard he applied there and those are the questions that we have up on appeal because you know they're my theory i guess that's my question you don't think that this filing even if it was six months later was a good cause in the interim had you kate had the case been dismissed ective record is the same as in with a totally different report from from now or somebody lies just in the same field yeah so they allowed them this was not immediate it was many months later some six months later in cook's where they allowed a new the emotion to an emotional man was filed pretty promptly but he didn't rule on it until jane and then the motion to reconsider came within thirty days of the court's ruling i mean this is just kind of the way the case progressed i mean it sounds like said i applied the prejudice standard but there's a legitimate question about which standard applied isn't and if it was good cause i would find there's no good cause or whatever and therefore this issue you know has this here but that's why i say we're kind of an abstract exercise because we don't know he may have applied we did cause standard and so whatever we do here how does it materially advance the litigation and if i can or who had a transcript of the arguments or when you i mean we don't know from this ruling what standard he applied like i had asked mr smith about the prejudice issue and the reason i ask is because the third question that certified here talks about the prejudice issue i'm wondering how these questions known so what i'm curious about is what is the hesitation here as far as these three questions and judge blighter certifying down what we what was going
statutory play which about what has to be a person can always go challenge that for example i deem signed under duress it appears to be fine it's on record but person can challenge that and say i was under duress a forged deed a person can challenge that they can challenge the actual knowledge it is this the actual signature of the person to be intend to convey the property so there are instances in massachusetts where someone such as the trustee here can go and attack the actual acknowledgement and that's how it's being done here point it seems to have all of force what the significance in your view of this document that we're distributing then is at and so that is what you seem to be saying is given all this other stuff that's out there this document couldn't possibly be a problem  there for ten for the second part yes the certificate as it's accepted the form of it is or rather than on the registered side and to do otherwise would change the titles or search on that side of the brain history of deeds of registered side thank you thank you