those i don't want to correct you on the record but i'm going to go back and look at the record itself because i think when the marriage was dissolved in two thousand and one there were agreement that marital settlement agreement payment and some other things made i know some are too minor you know some of the kids are minor some might have been to an adult child but they were  and let me just shift she her pick your brain a little bit i think that the difficulty in this case is the settlement agreement or a thousand dollars a month directly to her for child support but there was no discussion or agreement about how the extracurricular expenses were to be split in the in the settlement agreement i think there was a gentlemen's agreement that outside of child support they would split the extracurricular activities that february two thousand and thirteen that child support application support application was reduced to one fifty eight per month but again no clarification of how they would decide that who pays the extra curricular activities so if to correct me if i'm wrong the discrepancy here is we know he wrote checks in the amount of sixty nine thousand three hundred eighteen dollars and sixty seven cents directly to starts with one three three nine zero five and then the difference of opinion is what he paid directly to or what amount that you paid directly to her represents  middle reject the evidence of interest and he's saying there's no foundation so it's an abuse of discretion ok so there was so you know judgment based on the evidence that about interest so and so it sounds like to mean just as a brain then you are talking about apples and oranges just talking about interest based on late payments and you're talking about interest on the day to judgment there was no judgment in this case until two thousand and fifteen that i think is that correct are we talking about different calculations of interest you said it was judgement in just one percent just as the brain is talking about the then i'm concerned well opposing counsel said that they're worth categorization of these checks into categories that you know were proper for you know good credit for an opposite  an exhibit that was attached to an objection that is in the record she's been really careful about not discussing the other documents i think i want to defend here he's trying this record is difficult  think it's the order of withholding or sick or reducing the child support to deny in fifty eight and requiring the withholding or order to be enforced to you so that's just for the record next we don't i i could not find and i do not believe the supplemental briefs submitted to the trial court the memorandums that could include some of this documentation there not in the record would you have any objection to supplementing the record if te findings of fact and we accept this twenty thousand dollar amount would you be satisfied if we may ended that for at the trial court to calculate a ridge and make findings as to how that amount arose in other words we can't really do a do over because the judge is retired so could we put the burden on the trial court to calculate interest based on that