only applies to cases when there is a very serious accident and i don't think we have that in either of these cases although it's very important the personally injury in each of these cases i think there was some poor police work i think they just saw that there was an ambulance there and so with the pay going to a medical facility handled without any further investigation they just rolled it  separate determination and distorted extremities and severely bleeding will wounds aren't there are three three distinct reasons you could require this test to be taken yes i don't think there is any like you where i think that you wouldn't have to have the distorted extremities or leading woman says if it was necessary that you be taken harry from the scene you could have a less serious injury that  hospital but i know that the officers did not shift the medical personnel to see one of you to stay on the injuries or is it proper for that policeman to realize the fact that medical personnel took him from the scene is know i don't think it has to be done you know the media it doesn't have to be right on the scene again in each of these cases the officers went to the hospital for further investigation or criminal cases but they didn't do any further investigation trying to determine what the extent of the injuries in these cases and again i i get back to the point that i think they're just looking and saying that someone is and the guy's pinned in the vehicle and can't get out so they take him to the hospital to rule out internal injuries your head or concussion and turns out he's got nothing he has now is the fact that he's got nothing when he gets reasonable is a case by case determination but generally if you have medical personnel at the scene deciding that an individual should be carried by ambulance to a higher than our resident it is reasonable for a police officer then to determine to believe th find it a personal injury and they did you know the legislature must have intended that weathering accident resulted in a personal injury sufficient to warrant testing to be based upon what a reasonable police officer under the circumstances would have  they have limited medical knowledge they're wired to make a decision quickly in light of the fact that you know what alcohol levels are fleeting and  the say we should get on a stretcher go because if i don't lose my job that's about what they say isn't that i'm required to take you on here with the ambulance but there's not that i know there's no evidence and that what usually happens no physical condition of the car as well that the condition of the individual really stated that he did not appear that he would be able to walk away from there how could he tell he could walk with it because  you know what i think just is trapped like they used the word required because they wanted to add something to they couldn't just said removed from the scene in an ambulance taken they don't have to say required so they must have meant something extra or some that meant mean something and then we have to be sure it was met in this case now you're telling us that peers are telling us that any time they're removed from the scene which is the women in the word require well i would say that it is with a reasonable would be a determination made and he bases in that generally when you do have an individual that is getting removed from the scene of the accident my on the ambulance personnel at their discretion they do have a need to be remove the outlines of the room so we're going to defer to the ambulance driver decision to remove the when and that's the whole basis of the police officers decision what the