biggest hurdles are there was not one not two but three there were really job descriptions it was carrying levels of formality i understand but three job descriptions in this record one of which drafted herself the latest one also the two thousand and seven one that was in place also the original one that had been adopted and they all indicate quite substantial already over budgeting i don't know if you've ever drawn up a budget but there's a lot of wiggle room and budgets you know where you're going to put things in you because there's a certain momentum once or so it's hard for me to look record judge didn't quite understand what you were arguing on the equal protection point and even though i can conceive of hypotheticals where or if you were dividing the world up into democrats and republicans you know the harold washington library couldn't say we issued library cards only to democrats and you know the grant park people couldn't say only the republicans in the city get to go enjoy grant park never be an irrational we fail rational but in this case even if we thought that there was a test higher than rational basis the very same considerations that lead to the override branch exception indicate that if you are a politically elected  seems to often it have authenticated the two thousand and seven job description and then there's a series of questions that are asked of her going through that job description you know is this correct is this accurate  patronage cases both at the supreme court level and in the circuit but the court has recognized you know that you you know if you're the governor of illinois you're entitled to have your primary and be of your which job description controls and it's completely irrelevant here in this position is under the current and the finance committee in particular correct reports to the finance committee and of the county board and the finance committee at the relevant time that's clearly a political appointment a political position because whoever occupies that  because if you look at her testimony and her authority to the budget planning is quite limited you just put a number together but that's not which yet even herself mean i can't find anything in this record protection claim is not just limited to her exercise of first term memory right you know her and i was giving you the benefit of the doubt on that but i was also saying that if l ron brand means anything it means there is party for a high level political position and that we can fix the district judges error and save that debate for some cases where it really matters but for these high level people hard for me to see is there is a great area that this is not sat president in this political affiliation in the first amendment and the court protection clause cases right but even giving you the benefit of the doubt of that hundred eighty five job description was unreliable and that job description frankly runs through you know the very the very things that would be protected in a in a i'm was hired and the former chairman who hired her mcmahon also admitted that that was the job scription that was used when she was hired and we think that controls and then it's reinforced and the details are expanded in her own the on political party lines based on this particular classifications for this purpose and there i think you'd actually almost have to overrule eldad and ranty to say that the answer is no yes and in fact  county personnel policies that it doesn't it doesn't change the job description so you would agree not to take it that if she had been a clerical person working for the county and had run as she did unsuccessfully for office as a democrat she couldn't have been fired for that certainly certainly it's you know that if the county becomes personal policy that is just a general anti discrimination role or even