interesting times in another bankruptcy case i recently had had to address the issue of the service member civil relief act and how it works in my crypt see in this case and that's completely outside the the due process of having a court action before the baxter judge hearing testimony deciding for the i'm sorry i was finding i believe there are and i understand the are you talking about the board a bar overseer so i believe there are and i understand that informally the board a bar overseers will not he continued to rent the property out he collected to read he was ordered by the probate court to account for the rents which he has never done he attempted to sell it he filed an action in the land court seeking to try title and when the land court found out about the probate court order they dismissed the case and sanctioned him for a frivolous filing suit his partner who was also his client mr attorney sure was appointed a successor administrator in april of two thousand and eighteen soon thereafter we filed a motion for relief from the automatic stay as did the commonwealth judge hoffman after a hearing after a brief granted it attorney cooper steen appeal to the u s district court and since my time is running out i want to focus on the rd prong of the test which is the prejudice the probate estate continues to offer prejudice as a result of attorney cooper actions the state remains open while the property has been sold and there was estate had to pay for the insurance and there is a continuing may just finish that sentence and there's a continuing increase of costs in the probate court every year that goes by until the final to be recouped upon the death of medicaid recipients who died with assets that money underscores the public policy of returning that money to the program so that the program can serve additional members of the poor who need need  case is somehow constitutionally infirm or that his constitutional rights have been violated mr christie is not the victim in this case his constitutional rights have not been violated carol tippett oh the person representative of the property in this case  lost her inheritance mr cooper steen from the beginning of this case has been engaging in wrongful conduct he is an officer of the court he is an attorney who is duty bound to obey the court's rules its orders and i supposed to be an example for the rest of the population and he has been none of those things gauged from the very beginning of this case an ex parte communications with miss tippett oh while she was represented by counsel duped her into signing over a deed for the never timely appeal at one point had fled the jurisdiction to florida we believe he has a house in florida another time they have gone to his house it was closed up looked at a looked abandoned they have gone to the door a few times and people in the house be applied in a civil context and although the u s supreme court case indeed and did indicate that it should be used sparingly and we agree with that we would suggest to the court that based on the egregious facts of this case this is a case  that was specifically intended for it to be applied and mr cooper scenes general position in this case is that if orders are issued by a court that are by no not appealed no stay has been granted and mr cooper did request to clearly that's the purpose behind the fugitive just intent on the doctrine to not allow that conduct and to not give people access to the relief of the court when they're denying that relief and they're denying others the ability to enforce duly issued value judgments of the court we would ask the court to uphold the dismissals in this case we think it's appropriate in this case there is a barge investigation pending and i honestly don't know why  nothing's happened with it five judges involved in the land court the bankruptcy court the bristol probate court the u s bankruptcy court have asked about why that is there are numerous violations of the rules oppression of conduct and it is