MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
two as modified by twenty two forty forty eight to ninety ninety five conti conduct with sexual contact she found that it was a categorical match because of the language that she found compelling the language defining the characteristics of the victim which in the statute was either the victim was incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct or physically incapable of declining participation in dealing with here doesn't require a federal compared or it requires a state crime relating to aggravated sexual abuse sexual abuse or abuse or sexual conduct involving a minor the relating to language is very broad  know but i don't i'm here to try to convince the court that that is the best way to do and here's why because it's the cleanest approach it is a conservative approach it takes definitions that congress has come up with already rather than require any kind of a match to a federal crime if the federal statute does not explicitly state that but if the court looks at mooi louis i was the immigration case and in that case really that's really broad that that the language could be could be viewed as broad but i'm urging the court not to do that again because i was born did not do that this court has not done that this court federal statutes cover all drug activity ordered drug abuse and or all crimes related drug use and this one said the same thing with regard to federal sentencing laws not covering all sexual content so it's not going to grab everything like knowledge in its questions does contain those relating to language and our position is that that language does have a broadening of fact so not only do we not have to have a comparison of the chapter other in other statutes some of them and but no five of our brief one of them is eighteen u s c section thirty five fifty nine basically says you know with your prior state offense would have been a federal offense had there and jurisdictional element satisfy like interstate commerce or defense or on federal land then accounts so congress congress knows how to for the generic definition of burglary and variant definitions in crime the court looked in criminal law understanding of the elements of burglary asked them drug paraphernalia relates to drugs that are set forth in this federal statute most people would say yet seems to relate to that and the supreme court rejected that expansion of relating to  indicated earlier you know it's something quick courts sometimes use it expansively sometimes not just going back to my fundamental premise to believe the categorical approach requires a standard that provides notice it can be applied only it doesn't require judges
israel and he was very aware of all the cases cited by the appellant and he went to great lengths to distinguish the main one and they relied on which is the dog i believe  a decision like including the jurisdiction would not lie in this case was correct however since your owners have the option of looking at this case do noble i would like to make six very brief points for it to bring to your attention if i disagree with anything in the trial court's decision it's the issue of purposeful of ailment now there were two aspects  certainly not under the new set of our making contracts her well the contracts actually were orders that were sent to israel so i don't  began the original business arrangement is probably more than twenty years old and it always was it always stems from an order being sent to israel for diamonds produced in israel and sent back to california but i mean israel is a major diamond center and you know i can't assume it but i suppose they just met them at some time in the exchange probably in tel aviv but there's no evidence in the record that that that the w who which the palace rely on is incompetent he did not have personal knowledge of the facts that he basically testified to in his declaration he says that the president entirely clear and quote all mr lies or does it say after the fact after everything that's happened i looked at the records and this is what they said was just that's not happened in testimony he had no personal because he doesn't know we objected to that declaration as part of our moving papers third point the parties clearly intended to arbitrate this case and i would point to in the letter declaration that he heard from some unknown source that you can't get a fair hearing in israel not in the arbitration and not in the court system i don't believe that's a competent statement i don't think it's true but i also don't was would call to look at them and evaluate them themselves that's where all the experts are in the diamond field that's where the brokers are who sold the diamonds that were sold and that's where the banks are that  bought these notes so the only party that's in california is just one person basically and the company records everything else is over there  letter to the west coast island club and one to the israel diamond club bragging about the fact that he's a member and he was one of the founding members of the one in los angeles and the rules are that individuals are members but they represent whatever cunt company they through this we're dealing with some very elderly people in israel who basically would have a hard time coming here to try this case and all the witnesses and all the goods and everything already israel and finally i would just like to say that address the issue so i don't think that there's any jurisdiction over them whatsoever and just by the last reminder the courts have stated over and over that the barrier in cases of foreign companies is it's high
so now to the unveiling of the two thousand and sixteen poster and the reason that you're all here so first i would like to recognize the five previous winners of the art room competition and please stand by my call your name and we will congratulate you in a moment that next you had an opportunity to view the wonderful art work of our top twenty talented artists and i would like to introduce them to you please stand as we call your name city color are a not so mellow yellow blue dance that charles sweet spring susan hurry to part with dixon spectacle patricia plan and now the winning piece for the two thousand and sixteen festival is from an artist who has led and who has a lifelong passion for painting and the thirst for true joy of life reflected in water colors are pretty like an oil painting the artist is self taught and has participated in multiple exhibits in the u s and abroad being a strong believer in the value of art in everyday life the winning piece expresses the overflowing joy we all twenty years ago i came here with my daughter was living broken completely a country oh so that union there was practically no hope for us they are just everything was and we lived in camden and in grand rapids i just had one suitcase every single neighbor where bring us everything we not only survived we are really living the american dream so it will be twenty years i worked twenty almost twenty years in adoption agency as a social worker as director of international adoption and just four years ago i quit my job to do full time as an artist seeing as our changes lives working with all friends and the russian orphanages and other countries orphanages i saw it took my family fifteen years to become citizens it was a long road of becoming a citizen of the united states exceptional country  active idea for the image crew and white house crew our host this evening in the commons at evergreen thank you again for letting us use this wonderful space as you leave this evening we have a gift for you as a token of our appreciation and we look forward to seeing you again in may as we celebrate the eighty seventh to have time where we invite the world to join the dance have a great
i don't  i don't think so you're saying
sorry about that i'm always the shortest person and last morning imus's united states attorney kathleen mahoney from the eastern district of new york the district court correctly dismissed this action burn under the freedom of information act as the court found defendants did not improperly withhold agency records responsive to mr macdonald's request the foyer request that mr macdonald submitted to the department of justice in may two thousand and fifteen was for the record documents from the office of the united states attorney eastern district of new york with information on the day he returned to work that assistant united states attorney john branch a lot of said he had on file and that he told and that mr told the united states court of appeals for the nd circuit in case number twelve for eleven for mr macdonald's request was referring to the oral argument before a panel of this court over one and a half years earlier on october three two thousand and thirteen in his unsuccessful employment discrimination action against the united states postal service however the a u s a had no recollection of stating during the argument that mr mcdonald had returned to work at the postal service or that he had a record in his file that showed that mr mcdonald had returned to work after his employment was terminated nor would the assistant u s attorney have made such a statement because mr macdonald's employment had been terminated and he had not returned to work at the postal service consequently it would not be any record in the file showing th mr mcdonald had returned to work after his employment was terminated in two thousand and eight even though it appeared that there would be no document responsive to mr macdonald's request in order to ensure that adequate search for potentially response or records was conducted the recording of the oral argument was reviewed the text of the entirety of the u s attorney's argument portion of that argument is on pages five to eight of defendant the recording confirm that the united states attorney did not state that mr mcdonald had returned to work rather he expressed we stated to mr macdonald did not return to work the recording also confirm that the assist united states attorney did not refer to any document or records showing that mr mcdonald had returned to work the department of justice and for mr macdonald the search for records responsive to his foyer request did not locate any response or record as the district court recognized mr mcdonald is mistaken in his claim about what the attorney said at the oral argument the court correctly concluded that the department of justice had fulfilled its obligations under the freedom of information act and summary judgment for the defendants unless the court has any question the government will submit the case thank you
and when the claim morning your honour's it please the court my name is john doerr and i'm hearing on behalf of the appellee let me all your honors i'll be very brief but i want to address one of the issues that mr employer raised during the argument and that is the tax they all accrued as of the date of mr employer's terminations he didn't file as complaint until post terminations he knew what the transaction was he was on notice to investigate those facts and more importantly judge mcnamee specifically concluded in action number one that mr employer knew the facts and the stated reason for not having those claims in the first complaint was completely and utterly bogus that was affirmed by this court on appeal denied and the trial court gave no reason for denying that motion to amend that is a very different case from our case for some reason judge hugh morgan action too said the judge mcnamee didn't give any reason of violations then mr employer moved to amend the complaint at that time after the summary judgment pleadings were before the court and it was with that motion to amend the judge mcnamee said no it's untimely i believe it will severely prejudice the other side  that was a decision without prejudice at the time but once the judgment was entered in action number one that is a judgment on the merits and that subsumes includes all of the other rulings of the court including the motion of the denial of the motion to amend whether or not it was without prejudice at a time when that was appealed your honor in fact the last paragraph of the ninth circuit's memo opinion says that that was a point that judge matsch made it was very persuasive and they bought it it was untimely would unfairly prejudice parties and i believe if you look at the fifth circuit case in the else and it's virtually the identical set of facts and at the very end of that case the court said it would be  situation that would ring hollow if you were to consider in a second action claims that were denied by virtue of a motion to amend in the first action that went up on appeal yet that appeal was affirm or that decision  it would certainly ring hollow if that were the case in this case you
notified by the  testimony is in direct conflict with the country conditions evidence of record which provide that the chinese government stymied population growth by setting family planning rules and implementing them through higher testimony and if we were to go up hold or say we could not reject the hijackers finding that he was incredible
ladies and gentlemen you've heard the reports of enemy planes are approaching in less than three hours an h bomb might fall over like myself i think you're going to be very interested in this story that we're going to tell you and in this age of missiles and manmade moons it takes on added significance there are no actors in this story but there are a lot of people the people of the city of portland oregon and what happened to them or could happen to them on a day that we'll call this is the lack of when the mountains and the city between the snowcapped crater of mount hood and the pacific it's tall timber country and this is the city i just drag a port on the pacific coast and its people are friendly and rugged in the tradition of the oregon trail population about one hundred fifteen thousand one hundred or less about the size of your ocean and this is what happened or children late and coffee boiling with these problems nearly a crazy turn of the woman's page of the oregonian thus managing to avoid the front page of a chapter or contain nothing but scare headlines a time the time is eight like all communities religion is important to people like its church architecture are forward thinking of nine a special services being held at the b activities and the twice weekly meeting of the city council was much involved to the matter sewer maintenance was one of the problems up for discussion broadcast in most areas at six forty or forty on your regular radio receiver the idea to move out of the city too fast but with caution
interpreted the phrase exceptional and extremely unusual hardship than twice first nine hundred sixty two and again in one thousand nine hundred sixty congress seriously modify the immigration law yet each time they kept this phrase intact statute kind of flies in the face of actual of the prior statute history in itself the board noted that in one thousand fifty two the word unconscionable was used when determining whether or not someone has met his exceptional extremely unusual hardship standard the board said we don't have to find that it's unconscionable it's something less than that this was the words used in ninety two statutes carried over into something less than that and of course the agency's interpretation of that that term which can be overturned and moreover if congress was really upset at the way that the board is adjudicating these cases from two thousand and one like they made a point to clarify what they want to happening in these cases back when the ninety six act was pas was proffered did not violate due process and therefore the actual assessment of whether or not he violated or he met a discretionary standard talked about the scores without your stiction review if you think you're
beat the abdomen there is no special structures except the reproductive organs in the female the antennae are friends with short hair rising from the edge of the like mosquitoes can remain dormant sometimes for years until the conditions of warm and water are suitable for hatching floodwater mosquitoes living in regions having cold winters over winter and the  most other mosquitoes over winter in the adult stage such hibernating adults can be found in hollow trees and covered under houses porches frame way the lava passes through the third and into the fourth and last in style the larva has no legs or other organs of locomotion and moves by a series of jerks are wiggles and from species the body of the lovers these appendage bugs while already differentiated are not yet well enough developed to be visible at this point of growth a shining glittering appare legs are carefully extended to support the fully developed
defendant did not stipulate that his travel was voluntary however he stipulated to it a set of facts reflected in documents that were in evidence at the bench trial that judge i can rely on and finding that the government had minutes burden of proof including with respect to any requirement on the travel element because any scienter requirement relates to knowing failure letters after clarification so thank you for asking on page six foot no three of our brief this is a misstatement the government repeatedly made mr gandhi did not request this for a low that page addresses you have a g o p policy statement as well as the department of justice report that explain that transfer furloughs are initiated by the bureau of prisons they have prisoners fill out a piece of paper called a furlough application which is the piece of paper that an evidence here but it is initiated by the bureau of prisons s across state lines and then can be more easily lost to the registration stories and put the public risk because as the attorney general explained in the smart guidelines sort of generally presupposes that when an offender is in any form of custody there is a better system of locating and monitoring them because the custodial body keeps track of where they are and so as you explained in the smart guidelines sorters registration requirements were not meant to track individuals in custody which is the same reason why individuals are not required to update their registration bother in custody thank you much thank you thank you
o o i know yesterday you can do anything you wanted to nobody could tell you what to do excuse me for interrupting boys and girls but maybe you would like to find out just place you're right anywhere you go wherever there are people you'll find rules but maybe there is a way we could go to a place without rules by using our imagination and here we are the first people to ever be on this island because well let's say this island is surrounded by man eating sharks ok there are no rules here you can do anything you wish be no game there are no rules about taking or wasting thing there isn't any here a doctor would only make rules like keep your arm bandage done till it gets well sorry no rules no doctors so or other safety rules what's the difference between not going in the water where sharks might bite you and not running out in the street where cars might hit you  well there are no parents here to make rules like you must be home for dinner by six so i guess it's up to you sunday have a nice meal with your friends with no rules you have nobody to say you have to wash up or be courteous or use good manners in fact i don't believe we've heard anyone say done about it to get there if we're going to have any fine we better make some moves well how do we sure do a rainy there what kinds of rules do you need well if that makes things fair but everybody and safety rules all right since we only pretended we were here all we have to do is pretend and we're back where we started now we have rules again do you think you can be happy about rules why then it will probably make
norma i told her she's not to invite you to this house ever again and she's not to go to your house i told her to judge but i guess she's too embarrassed i don't think she realizes that not telling us far cruel you normally you came into this house under false pretenses you pretended to be something and you aren't that's not honest and it's not nice and i don't want to be friends with someone norma i like you very much but you're behaving very badly now and you're far too intelligent not to know what you're doing or stand your reasons you and your family were the only two people who ever saw my diary before are my teacher mr carter and mr clarke the principal but i thought that i should read some of it to you because some things have happened to me and the best way to tell them is the way i had them put down for myself if anyone had ever told me that these things could happen to me really i wouldn't have believed them so i don't know if you'll believe me but i think this is important to think about because you don't get rid of things just by not thinking about them you have to do something about them the main thing is that young people like myself are growing up very fast and pretty soon we'll be grown up and this will be our world and it'll be what we make it and whatever we will be is whatever shape were made into by our parents and so we have to worry about the world and our parents have to worry about us and well i don't know maybe when you hear what's written in my diary maybe you'll think it's fine and that's the way things ought to be but i i think it's not fine oh i asked for a body and really i'm not that important but i just have to hope that i'm right and it whatever happens nobody really thought about it and how you have to make up your own mind other people are going to think you can't let other people think just personal thing i told her i wasn't jewish she must have heard me but i don't see how she could have because she just went right on with her ideas as if i'd never said a word and when i left she told me that it was very difficult for her i really think she expects me to feel sorry for her i can't figure anything else i'm so confused this is so much more than i can figure out ashamed i don't mean to be defiant or anything but i would like everybody to know that i'm going to keep on wearing my  everybody which is a lot of people in their own way everybody doesn't change but one by one people do some change more into what they were and some are ashamed to be there where they were and their pride is hurt if i hurt anyone's pride i didn't do it out of means i'm sure of that and if i p for more understanding i didn't do it either because i'm a friend of the jews it's not i'm just not an enemy of anybody
turned out that you didn't get enough signatures somebody else did or twenty with past all of the relief your side apparently is already part of the the order to the city of scottsdale i can't find anything that you have asked us to do that pertains to the current situation you do speak of the past but not to the current situation isn't that a classic lewdness issue here that just done it's over and as a  complaint but is now said you can go back and restructure the complaint bring in new information presumably bring in the chilling effect of past activity  that's all in the future right what can we do what can we do to help you i mean you ever the have complained about occurred in the past or as a part of the state action the judge just said the district judges that you can amend your complaint you get something new is my point colleague pointed out you can certainly do that right on the basis that my colleagues and i can ask you anything we're going to give you two minutes to talk
counsel when he invoked it by telling him that he had