MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
it is the mortgage or who did the wrong not the property that did work at the square the two year claim period with the ten year contract extension nomination i believe that in this spring court recently she doesn't in rule that it is they claim it's against the person through the proper but that means that if the bank prevails on the mortgage and there isn't a rear it's that they can't use limitations and if there is no underlying now there's no longer anything to foreclose on because you have now no longer have secured interest because what's owed on the note is nothing and if there's nothing on the now in the bank then title to foreclosure action is time  prevailed on your foreclosure action and there was no arrearages do agree that he wouldn't be able to dance that's the essence of the estate because the two years had already passed that is correct in this instance we've got yes and somebody was making payments but that was never brought up in the trial or i believe so i'm correct in that
understanding and very rarely do force that was that's my understanding of the matter and then there was a claim for maintaining a chronic nuisance the home forever because if the judgment for sixty seven thousand west now off the years interest are so over seventy thousand dollars is a hell she will lose her home because the only ability that she would have not been heated paragraphs one and two at the same time that she behaved paragraphs three and six the penalty is just as high the the ability of the plaintiff to prove the case the hardship on the mind of to actually have to prove it on the merits is the same which is not high now after the trial court vacated paragraphs three and six damages after having been summoned and then not appearing on two three four five maybe six or seven  responded may twenty ninth and it being june twenty sixth now some of these were just you know letters to the court some of them were requests to have an attorney but now just these are the ga judge in this discretion agrees with her and says you know this is a big deal but you have to leave your own are here and he permitted her to descend on that count that was the and the court again after hearing mrs long in the testified after hearing the fact that this house had no mortgage that she state produced no evidence in support of the default judgment this is simply not true the trial court's order says and i am going after due consideration of the evidence that it is considering the evidence presented by the state now why didn't the record well off the state didn't she to ask for a court order the defendant continued her pattern of ignoring this case if she had been she couldn't ask for a court reporter but she just continued to somehow sit this entire proceeding she could have been there suggest that this fifty five year old grandmother should have a chance to be heard in america she has no criminal record of a she also testified she was not aware of any criminal activity and she was working at night each during the entire
good morning minnesota would you call the cases from illinois make that point clear the second point your honor is a balance of interest rate and the bank protectionism in the same it is an exact same situation when you're using the power of the police power they're strong with protecting the restaurant that  hundreds of dollars in here for this monitoring of the city's never once used for scripts how can this get this cannot be constitutional this can't be under article one section six this can't be seen as a reasonable search this morning are explaining that the circuit court properly graded judgement for the city on plate just constitutional challenges as for the due process challenge of the two hundred foot were we submit that as rationally related to several regiment governmental objective and as for the g p s requirement it is not a search and it was not an unreasonable search so it does not run afoul of the ordinary constitutions and reasonable searches clause beginning with the two hundred foot  thousands of stops in the loop and hundreds more around chicago the food shelves parking near our restaurant entrance entrances and can affect the appearance of the restaurant can't be congestion close to the entrance there can be unfairness in the competition that results when a truck is allowed to temporarily park so close to a restaurant and safe enough business when the truck decide have remotely comparable overhead on their rental property taxes and the restaurant unfairness in that kind of competition you don't hear it here ok read any of the community it's not just about the gas station owners you know the community has an interest in having those services that are going to be more permanently rotated there our brief and in the event these are there congestion sources there's no reason to believe they routinely draw crowds at the same time as through trucks or that they involve anything like sidewalk cafes that take up part of the it's not an unconstitutional search to require business to keep records so that if the need arises the government can access it the proper licensing administration christmases in the california papers case  speaks volumes to that the fact that this isn't about congestion well if it became a problem there were to many your lives and so you can have more than two trips next week joe you know it's  services for the services deals with fewer trips but that's it's a completely separate case from this one supposedly distinguishable as you heard it's about the medical district the small that has ambulances and hospitals and the concern
is not here today she regrets very much that she could not be here she certainly will listen to the world argument and participate in the decision making process of the spee didn't the trial judge find that all of the activity in and out of these three and we go checking account and these non other non marital accounts actually transmute did yes ok the non marital property into marital property can point to where it appears in the record it doesn't appear to be in the record counsel so it's not in the record we can't review them sure all right i don't know your time is up the buzzer went off but you will automobile for example which she agreed was to be his and the two college shot accounts they were to have each manage one of them so great question but those three issues i believe the purpose balances i'm not here to dispute that however i do not have a disagreement that there were these investors trust was an account that was gifted to mr johnson as to the court's ruling which was he got the balance on the deed of the marriage and he did not want to go ahead and rule on the motion to quash because of the attorney client privilege during the course of the trial he didn't get to that period did he before he made his ruling and of the trial he did not rule on the and he didn't hold any others with regard to the attorneys even after he denied admission of the exhibit in the offer of proof yes
given the boot with some more public domain goodness right here on steal this show where everything you can take and use it's in the public domain anybody can have it hold it use it and i'm really excited about today's footage this comes from nineteen twenty nine it's a newsreel entitled today and yesterday and it compares preheat world war one with post world war one hundred twenty nine about a fifteen year begat there and a lot of other things trains and cars and city streets and kings and queens it's just great just a fabulous ride and what is also very interesting about this is the film was made just prior to the crash in one nine hundred twenty nine and so you the music and the feel of the senate are if you get that real uplifting it's like kind of like a feeling of we have arrived and nobody suspects what is going to happen just shortly after this film was released really interesting but it's also it really talks up for nineteen twenty years which is really one of my favorite eras  matter of fact i really enjoyed this footage because i'm doing a series which i'm really jazzed about pardon the pun jazz age jazz to think phil follies and so i want to use some of this footage in  that it's what i like about public domain if you're if you're creating some new new thing or your own documentary you can use this without having to worry about licensing or copyright claims or anything else well anyway it really
because you find a man with the back of his head shattered my gun lying by his side is no reason to assume he's been shot thank you you also assumed that the bullet is large and over stein's cranium because it hadn't emerged through the front now any student of elementary i had exactly when last week for the first time and the last time i see i believe it was is having to have a large sums of money to men in key positions for the information they may have had in their possession i believe that was his habit mr holmes thank you a lot better when your wife is on her way here i wonder if i might look at the premises of the crime but of course of course doesn't belong to god are you serious holmes of course she has objections i have no  yes it was like mr rudd i'd like you to think very hard a great deal depends on what you're going to say not as far as you can remember that was the position of
that's very interesting thank you very much tommy that i run a lot of cash that you coming watson and it was until the rain cleared in the gas lamps came on and he started to discuss the case admitted owning the tomahawk well i don't know it keep saying the same thing every time you watch alaska once again is this your understand what i'm trying to a holmes this is possible when it gets to the point where i have to learn black four  that he saw mr by subject tonight in the car door outside room number thirteen the room where the bodies and sees percent he also suggested perhaps we might
them and getting a verdict he didn't say he wasn't trying to get them to come out either way you mean guilty or not guilty and now but i don't think that's the here i think the issue impartial judge problem but here we're talking about he did not give the typical iowan instruction the typical allen instruction has a cautionary language but now i think issue and there's nothing more to be said regarding the cruel and unusual punishment for non capital cases i think however of going  he handed her because she can't pestering him and he thought she was an addict addict he thought she was an addict we don't know exactly what he thought well we know what she just said to him and we know he went and got concrete and told to her you know it's  that we can or ignore the fact that this particular the only reason that we have to believe that he said that is the police officer who the trial court found has serious credibility problems and had misrepresented under oath you know at that now what is going on in me is covert drug transactions in order to prevent themselves from being accused of having an lord and it ended perhaps somebody here there was  concrete from him to buy gas money or whatever it is i mean that's just it wouldn't happen i think that it's still i mean even s even if he started as a means to like you know get some cheap gas money or something like that this thing that you know when it was not neutrality of the instruction turns to avoid any potential coercive impact and here he didn't use a cautionary language he didn't give as good
fifty two de klerk will report the title of the will
adventure i never knew what to expect i seldom expected what i found i had decided to spend a quiet evening at home and i was determined not to become involved in any new scheme that ohm's would invent i noticed you didn't ask who you took pains to point out that only you would benefit by your brother's death if you knew you made a threat it wouldn't be so concerned with your own innocence you're right i don't know who's yourself from us too long gentlemen that appears to be a preoccupation with more than one member of your family as a you know in my brother too and the reason for your being here not i said the same thing and you agree with me you do think it's a lot of how does one fight a myth or is your opinion as to how should i take this matter serious obviously taking it serious thing by defying it by coming down here to prove that it doesn't exist in if i get during dinner you want and i just want to see how easy it was the plan says things on someone else well really homes for old you know i  and quite a time getting back  you're going to report it to the police less than useless i'm afraid no court in this world would ever convict on the evidence we have well assuming you're right and my new to me turning assumption that nothing we can do yes it is we can at least remove the assumption that with me getting into the  the rest lies completely in your hands ago or listen i went riding across the more they started racing i was broke away from it and you could stop him to go high fence and film and alice became blind but you can't do that to the best of your life it was an the facts and we know the facts  something to be done i don't think so what's a young lady used to with an ancient legend and a murderous walks free when it should go to blue she said no cold in the world would ever convict h
anybody who deals in the real estate transaction which the statute says should be covered under this act isn't that true and i think that's accurate but i think here the defense i'm hearing in a real estate transaction and you transfer of d you're assuming you know that the definition of a real estate transaction is a change of a and and that may not be what every list the transaction is under the used where is it in the complaint in addition to suggest a better decision just based on the term mortgage broker and her decision to deny the motion to dismiss was based on the term mortgage broker and that bathroom in itself has never been used in  holes i think i think in in in the looking at that question even if it's a question that was certified by the court i think beat the that's or should be near a definitive no because the defendants try to spin it into real estate transaction and
between august of two thousand and sixty the only order that was filed franklin county after that was in december two thousand and ten and in december of two thousand and ten the  brief that i'm not going to belabor going into at this point but in conjunction with bad looking to december two thousand and ten or think that's the key to all this the december two thousand and ten order was not drafted by the same i don't know what he did with respect to deduct to get off calculate his gross receipts from his tax return but we don't care and don't care because we're using something better than the gross receipts from the tax return for using the actual bank deposit which was when he started becoming self employed as an attorney so with respect to how well the issue of rhetoric today there's another issue that i want to dress because the other  sounds case for six and a half years before she moved to franklin county to st clair county because of that we're asking that no retract to be be attributed regardless of what the dollar amount is that is calculated for for current child were discovery problems associated with it and i do want to just briefly ultimately the father provided every document that they've requested in the way of discovery and yes he did have some trouble coffee certain documents   with regard to the petition the equity in this case is that of the tissue should not be allowed while petition the modified in the hopes that eventually and get the documentation to find out what's going on there's not a different workers in several requests going on at this time he stated the sometimes the and didn't do it then and with regard to that you're having trouble figuring out what your income is look at the previous order you look at the previous order here we have based on the needs of the child because he refused the previous judge in the previous county discovery the judge got set up discovery granted he didn't comply as quickly as he should have the respect of discovery he was ordered in january of two thousand and fourteen to provide materials and he didn't provide them until i came into the case in
situation is arises when that intervene that interesting decision changes the claims in defense of the parties so that the prior judgments no longer has a controlling effect on future litigation party and it also talks about whether or not there's an ongoing legal disputes because the cases have declining to apply a change this change law section in cases such as personal injuries and because most cases you documents the two thousand one foreclosure case was dismissed on a twelve six motion which really only looked at the two arguments that the defendants are making in that case y frankly like the federal judges you know i'm getting this off my dog because your clients attorney just amended the other side and then said i don't have anything to say i mean this is bizarre now all new complete well it wasn't it was that it was a new argument was a new defense and i think a lot of councils were struggling with how to address this issue because of west point a lot of kerry and no trust a lot of new york correct and the reason why we didn't just passports when you did all thing is because we still be in the same boat the federal court dismissed with prejudice as to this plaintiff my client not with respect to any other party that here i think i think the choice of our federal court i think had to do more with what was going on at the time in the at this body of law going up on a while but the state courts work indeed with these types of foreclosure
exceptions the first exception is whether the statute of which suit is brought authorizes punitive damages it's our position to nursing home care of section three days six  it to bring claims and the reason why was there in the home side of the daily basis alone with their family and the legislative history of the schedule which is probably one of the very few where the legislative kids through section three day six zero three zero the nursing home care act which authorizes a resident to maintain a option under this a nursing home care for any other type of relief would have spent much more than one sentence in analyzing it in the dutch case which i cited in my brief and it is almost essentially a leap from a legal estate standpoint the court was called to to determine whether under the consumer fraud times due to our example the resident dies immediately after giving the wrong medication with respect to the legislature again the three
votes votes coming up thank you bacon a member of congress from long island new york resume within ten minutes after the last
green years of unrest that followed the civil war a powerful secret organization called the legion of the blackout sprang up in the western united states its members were to be found everywhere defying the law using the law for their own purposes working toward the ultimate goal of revolt in the on wednesday morning a lone ranger it followed only in the will waiting for larry to ride down the trail from the east johnny objected to the masked man plan i don't like it it's too late you know he comes larry you'll be all right for the st stage but what happens when you change horses a
here it's an ingredient between the two parties and directors of the association and then they have the duty and the power to determine whether the conduct of any member is detrimental to the welfare of the association and to fix the pending for such misconduct or any violation
us say anything about what they're talking about here the first page when you look at it it says under sure it was two men or fifty thousand dollars second page when you look at it says under church more coverage no cover referenced in my theory the supreme court talks about looking at these from an aspect of an ordinary person and i think that when we practice in syria so heavily th medical name doesn't have any of it because there's no carole if you look at the actual policy language there is no language regarding any of those and that is attached to the any other questions like thank you re
feed it has to be a rational relationship it has to pass that test is this is this rationally related to what it is intended to do it is a fee and i know the council those might argue with that i basically be to write a receipt but in essence it is five hundred three hundred five hundred dollars to write for the work of the city to write a receipt give it to the individual who owns the car to take it down to the tax can't call it a tax but it is a tax it is a penalty you get a t y and you have to pay the city five hundred dollars to get a receipt to get your car out of town but the penalties don't come from the city they come from when the city money for the see and again i don't know whether there could be more gold in there because we weren't allowed to do discovery in this case it was dismissed before we even know whether it was rationally related i submit to you that is not and  imagination how it can be rationally related because if you're not allowed to litigate this issue and prove whether or not it's rationally related to to what it's supposed to be doing there's never a case that you could x none of them were kids which is the distinction that we are trying to make here then you can charge a fee that isn't rationally relate determine whether this was a good public policy the determine whether it was unconstitutional with the fire department that's with taxpayers money goes for it doesn't go for them to sit there day just because well to start when you're it is an accident for instance using the example of the white house when someone path here which is in a facial challenge on this three hundred dollars for city if it was going over five hundred would be a means of how these can man be reasonable now there are circumstances because we have the fines we have the penalties all of the it was a double jeopardy argument as well as including penalty and i noted that they argued that it shouldn't matter what it's called but the penalty is that is that the penalty is in the criminal case that was in the criminal case