i was trying to say but now i'm not for rising has conceded to my nine hundred hours of service for nine hundred seventy nine which one of the argument because they told me i didn't have enough time i was one hundred i was short of my pension and left for rice or the year you left your telephone when you go into another job or where you retiring what prompted you to leave because that's the whole issue is whether you're one hundred hour short that y just curious what prompted you to leave no i was terminated in seventy nine you would terminate yes but i already had already you know i'm already vested so i thought so now forty two years later they're telling me that i'm not administrative review process there was some question as she mentioned she started working in one thousand nine hundred sixty seven but she wasn't age twenty two and when a result was an out and it included a provision that allows plans to disregard service prior to reaching age twenty two she rejoined new york telephone in october of two thousand one thousand nine hundred seventy and if you just use that date to compute whether only had about six weeks of service in one nine hundred seventy nine according to verizon records during the claims review process she mentioned that she had had some service in earlier points in one nine hundred seventy so the claims review committee gave her the benefit of the doubt on out and basically said we'll give you the year of service for nine hundred seventy although arguably she didn't have the not so really in terms of the issue that they addressed in the administrative review and the judge woods addressed it is the question whether she had a thousand hours in that last year of employment seventy nine in one thousand nine hundred seventy nine and  she made some different statements along the way about when her terminations date in her amended complaint she alleged that she was terminated feb thirteenth one thousand nine hundred seventy nine which is consistent with records during the course of the summary judgment briefing she had some affidavits saying that she thought she worked through the end of april in and  verizon and judge woods again gave her the benefit of the doubt on that issue and she still comes up one hundred hours short even using not date which is inconsistent with verizon's records but at least for purposes of summary judgment judge woods gave her the benefit of the doubt so unfortunately yes we're talking about one hundred hours and verizon certainly took no pleasure in finding that she came up short but of course the plan administrator is have a fiduciary obligation to administer the terms of the plan as written and there was really no matter how you counted the hours of the years of service she suggested she wanted to use hours that were quote extra from prior years but the plan language incorporates a definition of year of service that in includes calendar year of service so and that's consistent with rats right out of the language of recess as it was think there might be an argument that you would if you were paid for accrued vacation or unused sick you would count them not sure well we don't we don't have the records of that but her social security that was her argument based on her social security earnings why couldn't you look at social security your needs to find then out well they did and if you divide the total social security earnings which include the severance pay which would not be included i think  total was about forty six hundred dollars for nine hundred seventy nine and verizon and judge woods divided that by her closing weekly rate of pay and she still comes up only with twenty hours  verizon's calculation was eighteen weeks of service multiplied by forty five hours per week which is what the plan gives you for a week of service and she still comes up short by one hundred hours so unfortunately giving her the benefit in judge woods did this in the committee did this the benefit of every doubt she still comes up one hundred hours short unfortunately for a ten year vested pension laetoli kept telling judge woods that i didn't work in one nine hundred seventy nine i only worked seven weeks but that wasn't true and i told them it wasn't true and then i had to go to social security and pay one hundred thirty six fifty for my records to prove that i made almost five thousand  so if i made five thousand dollars no way i work seven weeks what he said was then gave you the benefit of the doubt extended the period from february to april and you still should know i can't be i couldn't i'm thinking that i already have a thousand