provide life insurance the fourth issue whether the trial court erred in not allocating places medical expenses between the parties in five whether the trial court erred in not ordering allen to take any part of my exhibit twenty six a extrapolated over the year as we took a pay stub from october of sixteen if you extrapolate that throughout the year her income was going to be a little over eighteen thousand dollars that year and looking at allen's and come he was employed with cameron his income with amarin taking out the proneness that he receives for not including the bonus if you extrapolate this and it was going to be one hundred and twenty  thousand dollars and then you would also have to add to this he had they had a poor blacks in jacksonville and he was getting income from that so adding that another proxy only forty five hundred his income for the year was going to be one hundred thirty three thousand dollars now that's a difference of one hundred fifteen thousand dollars so the disparity in income is large and when you look at the reason under this factor that the one of the reasons he's sad that this factor did jennifer's requests for maintenance was because at some point allen might retire and at some point her income might go up i don't believe these were appropriate conditions to look at they weren't brought up at the currently employed but seeking employment as i know that is not cracked my client was working part time but he was working presently sixteen hours a week now she was working as sixteen hours a week but she was also going back to school she wanted to do the bridge program of the questions the terms of place of this kind that is people's lives aren't static so when the court is called upon to evaluate i even had the exhibit showing how much it was going to cost to attend the program if she got into it so he did so and were you know like you know judge because at that time it was speculative and i thought it would be affected she was being speckle speculative i'm at that point she was working at memorial as an lpn and she wanted to go back they were working with her they knew that she was trying to go back to school to get her are in so they were actually working with her hours so that she could would be and i think it would be incumbent upon alan to buy it if that happened upon alan to file a motion to modify afterwards if she did get that program in that program and then can then come in later on and address it if the trial court didn't address that we didn't make a decision on that basis then that might you know abuse of discretion is based upon the understanding that you that even in alan's supreme he he didn't say that there should be any maintenance you should said that there should be a deviation of man's and that mean and should be a thousand dollars per month so even opposing counsel  shouldn't be allowed to file a motion in us as has substantial change of circumstances that he has retired until he's sixty five years old and there's an end in the fear that was yes yesterday there are cases and i don't have them with me today then cite that yes there are cases that say if you retire on a voluntarily basis early that does not necessarily mean that your main it's going to go down because you still permits i would have to go back and and like judge i at the time if you're saying that i don't recall what those i know at the time the statute was it was zero to five years point two five ten years this point four ok ten to would definitely down in the statute that if that determination is made here's what's going to happen right and the court should disregard that according to you and you very well may be right if the decision is made here's what i'm trying to give you a good reason to deviate would not be that the trial court considers the amount required to pay was in his judgment outrageous sure that the trial court judges do this they might look at what those maintenance calculations will be and they do it backwards and then they go back and they figure maybe that's not how the legislature wrote that act and that's not why the act was chad it was and again it was in the same line that i was just talking about before she was only working part time because that's all she could work because she was going to school she was doing tutoring issues taking care of the older child or the seventeen year old child so that's why she was only working part time on a p r and basis was because she was going to school and she she was still working i mean this is a jennifer isn't the person that's sitting at home waiting to get maintenance she was that she was working as much record judge you're going to find that my client was was working part time but she also said was going to school she was taking care of the seventeen year old she was  and it wasn't until after about time that she filed her divorce which was two thousand or being that she go to work for memorial medical center by her choice by her choice on a part time basis at that time she wasn't involved in a bridge program around aryan program the evidence was that and i specifically asked jennifer a line of questions about her example of where you work how many hours  yes and she said she applied for two but didn't get accepted through the one i asked her of the one she had applied for it within the health system outside of memorial and she said no but she was happy with the moral extrapolated she would make about twenty five thousand dollars a year so if you think about that if she goes for sixteen hours every other week and works eighty hours every week she that's almost a five times difference i think judge perry felt that she was be able to complete her training and education and get a better position not too distant future which would reduce her need for maintenance that's something which when that occurs reasonable expectation the future she might break a leg get an automobile accident something else could happen the job doesn't come through and you know that that's how life goes sometimes sure what's the purpose of going on getting my education with you know counsel i'm drawing maintenance and one of the one of the points that we haven't discussed this point and maybe i'm wrong but it looked to me like assets being given to the wife that was to offsetting the need for me i certainly don't know that he thought it was let's say one hundred percent offset if you will but he certainly thought as he should that it was a factor which supported this conclusion but those assets which of them were readily liquidated liquidated will well we certainly wouldn't want to sell well the reason i smiled is that i think we come from a different generation where i work full time in college i work full time school married that type thing and i think one of the things i put in my brief just one point in time was there is nothing in the record that would suggest that jennifer is a heap of maintaining a whole workload and going to school she talks about her health and you know certainly she's had some prime issues over the years but as she admitted to trial it doesn't prevent her full time so i would rather scheduled work for a full time and pursuing specifically but i will if i recall she was attending lincoln land in jacksonville maybe two days a week at that point and then she was doing some map tutoring on the side to about sixty hours a week understanding would be that it was essentially a program designed to bridge from the lpn program into an r n program without requiring to be a four year b s n that type d i would like to think that the trial court's decision is a little while for as one more foresight than that to make it strictly like a one happen could happen based upon again in this case jennifer strange i think if it did that's taken into account as i think judge perry did then i think it's less likely to result in one of the things in this is off topic slightly you're talking about modification and official occasion i was miss carne's argument for this court that allen should not be able to file generosity thing are very common right and alan and i specifically discussed that part of the argument i mean basically bottom line is that we fell that or should deny me  it was asked whether or not jennifer could be going to school and working i like to point out that if the time trial i mean this from from my briefs i've got the exact jennifer was working the sixteen hours every other week jennifer is also taking two classes at lincoln lee and community college microbiology and chemistry the classes and studying and receiving tutoring to test out of two math classes so and let me clarify she wasn't in the bridge program yet she in order to qualify for this bridge program she had to meet certain off occasions a c t and she had already have some classes are already under her belt so these are pretty rocks to get into the are in program she had not been accepted into that program so she would then be on the link atlanta jacksonville campus on mondays and wednesdays every monday and wednesday from eleven am to eight pm sometimes sometimes taking a break for lunch she then would try to attend tutoring or testing out of the math classes because she was trying to get into that program in the fall she didn't have time to take these math classes that she needed because that would set her back will be a new year so she is trying to test out of them in doing so she  hours each time you have those and those are but that was just with the tutor she also was studying at this time and although the test firing was that her medical conditions weren't preventing her from working and if you look at the totality of everything she's doing has she was also going to doctor's appointments and then her daughter had some medical problems to depression thanks so she's working part time she's taking two classes she's tutoring and she's taking trying to take care of her health conditions and during that time again she was at memorial one of the reasons she was only looking at a job to morial in jacksonville was because they were really working with her they were they were setting her hours so that she could still go to school and give her time off to go to these of the trial  done no there was no there is no evidence even the first time that i have even seen anything about him retiring other than and my argument that he should be able to retire early was the judge saying support the child support is the first you to that section the right there's a refers to that section because of a long line of cases that defines gross income out after child support when they drafted maintenance guidelines and the statute instead of reviewing all that case line we are they just referred it to the child support section so under my calculations yes i didn't clue gross income from all