MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
able to cross examine the victim is a separate issue i understand that that would be deprived of fair trial might not be allowed to cross examine her with respect to the credibility of her it always be the defendant will always have had the opportunity or is it depending on what the facts were in the old theory of the case versus the new theory of the kids as to whether or not there was meaningful cross examination in the first trial in comes with the defendant has an advantage as it to be saying that it will give the defendant has a good change of winning that somehow substitute for his confrontation clause rights the she did not have sexual contact when dating but she said according to the state i know sexual contact with anyone for two weeks prior to this attack similar evidence has no mayor on the confrontation clause is he or so the stage or in that world we could put on the state attorney to testify that she said that she had not had sex with the two if we're talking about the mantra trial certainly if we're talking about an extended it says that the first trial there was an error i'm not sure that the law of the case determines the back there's a confrontation issue
and when you
we're ready right now think the person prior to the date trial works had discretion regarding whether the defendant was going to receive time credit for time spent on connection with this case summary stays the trial word cheryl managed to give credit to the defendant more times than in home detention but now was this confined as a result of the condition of the spot that he can find a home my monitoring her home detention as a condition of the spot when even when your client wants to change the conditions to include relief for work to go to the sheriff stitches dozens talk about home detention it says home supervision a term you don't use that term griefs but that's what the term means in the general something new certainly we are that there are two methods of be placed on in order to be remanded to custody where is if he's not the sheriff's program the sheriff can immediately run the n t n to the confines of the jail so there is a difference there's a difference as to what the process is by which the violation is handled what difference does it make i hate to use the expression what difference does it mean to the t i think it's crazy to argue that the situation which is precisely what happened here does not qualify is he supervisory authority particularly under the provision or any other officer for which the judge would be an you can get you could be placed on home detention under the act depending upon the nature of the funds is twelve months to two categories of fences or ninety days ninety days call months and then at the discretion of the department rights and therefore they're not in custody were bought houses going did a person who's out on bond for excluded offense can be placed in detention under the so the general assembly at least for that's the only thing he argued that is cause in custody and now it's one hundred eighty degree change now he's arguing that he doesn't have to be in custody that the legislature all ruled beecham overrule ramos that smith is in all situations other than to psychiatric treatment for substance abuse treatment and which also takes out the word me and uses share there is no argument it's reasonable only give time credit when the defendant is in custody because the really your argument i guess appealed but it sounds like it's an equal protection argument because you can see that there are elements of the home intentional that are here for example be the the ability to arrest and charge somebody with skate or the face didn't have to go to court to get a war can run off and arrest somebody ok and then different than here because the probation department has to go to the core issues you want and somehow they should be a distinction as to whether a person is confined or nap under they at they are going to release him to a halfway house with a minute or two more in a person gets creditor and then after a period of time these are real life situations that exist statute and talked about the determination of custody in connection with psychiatric and substance abuse we have to assume they meant something by their change it wasn't meaningless and when you look at it they had time to fix the determination
it's not clear to me that it was that is to you that they were only going on the twelve point five six s statutory and and and and not reserving our reserving as you want to do that that they would have
assume that maybe because the effects that were outlined in the report of their expert which did not did not have any kind of specified amount of money coming he talks about future damage testified that he workmanship was not causing any immediate property damage that's that's what he said yes well it didn't take too long to get into the record to see that all the conditions of the contract were not for the first thing the cont insurance company to say this still isn't working well i wonder issued from the insurance company explaining that they were going to make an additional  insurance company you know that there were all these gro part the insurance claim is something different than this claim well all the insurance kept because about is getting released from any further claim belief so i mean they you know questions about the contractor but once again they didn't try to substitute in the visually came up with what the amount he should be it was only later t was going to cost to fix this was denied because they didn't have the numbers but i don't think the contractor at this stage in the way this testimony can tell you to say i've done everything
shop the house gift shop example might be the flags interacting with the system when he stands a in recess this weekend on c span to the first three days of the waco
and except in an instance where he made a trip t
know is that it was undisputed is that manson had back pain for over twenty years when he worked for the city of waukegan on october twenty seventh two thousand and five minutes and was on duty working and he stepped in a  attention in the city doesn't dispute that this is an injury we just state that this is a minor injury and what is also interesting is after me when he took after eleven days when he went to the medical doctor he didn't go his regular doctor which is interesting since in the past twenty years he has p t s d gone to libertyville medical group after any type of back but this time he went to vista hollow where he was diagnosed  that when the circuit court looked at it just based it on dr levin and i understand that most of the commission's decision was based on dr mark levin opinion but there was also a numerous amount of consider a minor injury tell us because there's nothing connecting and the thing is specially when everyone sees that even dr shah states that there was something that occurred probably between there was a flaw in the underlying opinion that there are the heck out of it which is why i brought in maria rose to testify before the records it's why i asked questions i asked at the deposition to expos militant melanomas had two major surgeries he has elevated cholesterol so hypertension issues he he gets to the doctor once or twice a year no treatment for back into the one nine hundred ninety eight to october two thousand and five transcript there is no mention of this nine hundred eighty eight film when he was going back and forth from the office to find this film our interpretation of this was he was talking about the two thousand five now this deposition was taken almost two years after he wrote this a medical report so he yarning put in his reports then he looked at the two thousand and five and then his next medical report he stated that he reviewed the two thousand and five in two thousand and seven i don't understand why he would benefit from after just being handed the medical report from the both that turning saying i've never seen this before and that you know pages later testify me i've seen all the films even though he hasn't ever written it and his records we all know that these doctors basically go from what is written on her medical records when they're testifying to to recall the recollection and that in
if they did do you find the young lady case interesting already learned to expect such amazing things in the home and i'm afraid that completes my knowledge of the first  if we go along now i can do the home things as we go few minutes before the representatives of the law  i've been doing a little detective work on my own
that was off my back like a d surely you're not afraid of wait a minute i have an idea that might turn this malice to a melody sing faithful and wherever together as one song now in your sorrow and despair perhaps you will listen to your songs as they might be so
you imagine that would do you think about again you got me i do years i think there's a connection i'm convinced a crime in our cities and corporate like any big business and you know so much about it why don't you write a book just what i'm going to do i ever get i'm not giving out any  you expect me to give up my social obligations when you guys keep me up all night looking the stiff i don't your mind well i like it do me a little favor jim i like it all company me a little trip to atlantic city it's a personal matter that's important to me taxi ride this morning and his closest friends are wondering what the fear is going to be eating in a bank thanks to the i heard something about the sea how would you like an exclusive on how the story's going to end i would i like to worth and every report must be a big shot if they want to pay that much right and it's my guess or the biggest that will do the paying mom maybe the top man of crime incorporated to know the identity of this nice spot operator and those just what do you a deal for a living mr killick i'm a life insurance agent seven canal street in case you're ever in that neighborhood do any of you gentlemen of the jury want to continue the questioning i don't morning get a fresh start  handle a story sure i'd like his way back with plenty of dynamite the secretary were murdered on their way here and the evidence stolen dixon was murdered because someone in the department was a traitor to the cause of justice but what else can i think the public is up in arms and rightfully so we've got to put an end to this crime wave are resign the public indignation dies down i think you could have all the marble games removed from school neighborhoods and operate making it a cup of while that goes for policy games and baseball pulls as well killer i can't testify as to how often can i took a bat that's what you mean you know what i mean you probably know i'm running up to get a regular cut from his racket i statements a lie i don't have to defend my relations with kelly but riley this grand jury would like to know just right again they gave you information because i did him a favor but that they were mr right it's something personal so it doesn't concern the grand jury you don't understand jim i want you to join our secret committee for driving the rabbit out of town was on the committee just a few of the men we can trust for only french westover an well for one and only up to the farm national brokers and cooperate on the sixth form of the arcade building which tony model finds it necessary to visit now and then another has pretty close to home a shared well some air force have been what these are some of our best men actually requires a good man to go crooked and get away with it that i'm afraid it will be necessary to eliminate the secret committee you don't realize what you're proposing i for one can subscribe to such drastic measures your suggestion is insane perhaps you two gentlemen prefer
free sorry i'll get to another ton going on this another call the world and if you want to take your things off in that beautiful i've got all th and if this girl really does exist isn't it rather a strange that we've seen nothing on her i don't think th that it helps you to get a job as an actress that's all right but i like a bit of all them quite a lot i can take care of myself seem to be better with one hand than i'm with you infinitely better no offense general no offense my poor flat break tell me about that well i don't want to post by the way i'm afraid i must ask you to sit over here like a kiss you for that i have
of the new trying to get together we particular now that we are
nevertheless in their product instructions what they tell people when they're looking for signal within the cells they said kept the cells where the examiner at the time was distinguishing prior art methods of selection you'd be trying only losers versus blocking there was never any issue about what you clocked with it so it's a completely different aspect of the invention
testified the three ninety eight was appropriate they either said two fifty or you said possibly three hundred so was it was a prejudicial error not to bring that doctor in as far as the standard because he talked about how he'd recertified because he wanted to be and you know so his qualifications or whatever but my question is i mean does the record reflect whether he was required to recertify due to that something happened during surgery and she was contraindicated for surgery for whatever was it necessary for the plaintiff to prove the elevated blood pressure that could never be construed as this as we said in our reading it's just like say i wouldn't be here today if i hadn't been or there was a general statement not anything burden of proof required before we do that let's look at what the jury heard period of a few hours to a reasonable degree of medical certainty elevated drug blood sugar was not contributory to the momentary problem that's what
to my ears i'm sorry that was walker and there's another to yeah let's see walker will get to happening in the number three are all it's a catholic is playing the number fourteen wakefield and it took sperry not too far from where we are tonight number six tix very plays number eleven rolls the winner of this game and that was t three to fifty three to play first quarter could quite get it out of bounds it goes to that's a lot of game to play tonight a thing that happened we saw that in the boys game few days ago back at the winter field house basketball anything can change right down to share looking for hel a lot of pressure by dominic back to three quarters of as a ball of play here still anything can happen yeah we're about ready to start the second quarter to walker walker under pressure sixteen eighteen i'm not sure that's correct but right out of school sports of sixteen eighteen belmont top by two up and marblehead up with four seventeen to play in the h something bad i don't know why they're doing it here but they're playing music at every time about it's not something they do back at up on or anywhere else i've been so bad music at that but you probably hear it in the background underneath their own basket it gets a chance at a three point play she gets one it just styles back out to right jenny call order with our weak level but when she goes up or to travel violation belmont marblehead ball four minutes to play in this court twenty one twenty seven by si goes up no good she misses the first three twenty two forty six point hair covering up the numbers and really bad music playing in the auditorium at the gym here sometimes i get caught up in i can't quite see what's going on here but i do my best again joined up here  twenty five thirty one you i will take possession violation twenty five thirty four with thirty seconds to play the third quarter marblehead ball twenty five seconds revisit that boy's side but let's take a look at it anyway tonight current with our games tonight is the salem chelsea game number one seller number sixteen chelsea over at salem as well tonight right now also twenty one jen call brings it up for forty seven twenty five thirty three thirty seven got twenty five thirty eight they're up twelve thirteen  just giorgio we'll get to
in the reason for this is that courts are overwhelmed the circuit courts are overwhelmed with the volume of cases they're personally fifty four residential million residential mortgages in this country and the estimates are significance and around the country justices such as yourselves are dressing issues about how we're going to deal with this situation which of them you may say we can never this is the most extraordinary of remedies that the civil court where taking away so are the school their lawyer and we're going to do to the communities and what the result is going to be and they were given and i think that this is where the agreements caption came in as if they were given an additional sixty days behind the statutory production period
that are hostile stated i'm writing this letter stating that i don't want mike burke to do anything further regarding my case i wrote him a letter letting him know i know the same but so he says i don't want to have more to do with t house child was decided in two thousand and seven the defendant is sentenced in two thousand and presumably the board knew about how child and knew that the fifteen year add on at the end in clear unconstitutional now legislature had gone back and fix the logical problem with the on by a month statute and people were it was it was somewhat murky i i agree and in the state street now agree that it would have been improper but at that point in time i don't think he was arguing being in that city but he didn't acknowledge there was a dispute at this time or by the court of this potential problem or it was just i only slightly familiar it would it might have some effect on our house time but it's not going to affect this particular case because the law by this time was that the fifteen year i don't was unconstitutional given the victim's direction at that point he decides to walk back in and he needs a companion tell him what happened the companion didn't used to follow the boys he goes back to the police or to the house the police arrive and
right how much how much they pardon me how to you don't deserve it  and she just what you said about me right from the whole company i'm sorry i i didn't mean i lost my that's what you've been doing for the past three  is a little something i think that's did when i first discovered this shall we say then i was angry then i must confess i was curious about me  but really i had no intention of telling his wife anything three martinis that same one manhattan three martini with my work comes with you it's different what i'm going to am that's just it he's not a story do you know who he really is no i never saw him the bottom line on this is no joke i'll say it's no joke you'll get ten years for this ten year i'm sorry old girl but from here on it's every man for himself shall i tell him why you gave it to me
the court also concluded that the legislature did not have a rational basis to afford a jury trial only to have been shot in violent offenders youngers the circuit court was wrong respondent is a first time  offenders differently by providing them with the statutory right to a jury trial is this court recognized in rate and a at the heart of every equal protection claim is that the patient that the computer classes uyghurs there is another clear indifference the recent they don't receive the same sentence they are treated differently because they are different every step of the suspender convicted of murder is always going to get a more onerous to criminal proceedings that the state must be given the same right to approve appeal suppression orders that it has in criminal cases is it inconsistent for the state to now argue that the proceedings are not so similar the juveniles and this court has recognized that other due process a jury trial is not mandated or compile and as a keeper in vision with regards to a jury trial it is up to the legislature who is in the best because if the disproportionate amount of series of paths is committed by a relatively small number of juvenile offenders so the legislature removed the biju and violent offenders from the general provisions of the act and subjected them to a different and more adult like sentencing structure because they have demonstrated unwillingness to rehabilitate their work they pose especially then danger to the public minors the legislature in this case quote in all respects alike so how is the first tell me how the first time jule offender adjudicated delinquent first degree murder under the juvenile court act is in all respects a like a don't provide for jury trial but they are getting day to day so in the best case scenario let's take the thirteen year old who was charged with first degree murder and she may be allowed to be paroled in five years not convicted of murder he has to serve the full term because he doesn't have a possibility of parole and by statute he's not given the opportunity to earn good time credit and he doesn't have africa rel because there is no possibility of emplacing extra care release which is synonymous with parole so that's ak that is not a distinction at all also the jury trial right has never been a debate on whether a certain sentence has been discretionary or mandatory the focus of a of a jury trial right has always said what is the if it's it's  but the potential of a serious of serious punishment and your honors it did not commit mr be considered serious punishment might respond it was a score to believe in virtually every juvenile education would be subject to a jury trial in court and this court in the cheney oath course has found that a jury trial right is not compelled under due process and juvenile prosecutions because they are different there are not criminal prosecutions in  convictions goners nothing has changed since c v nor has our understanding of a judge jury trial changed since c b so based on this one construction there is no constitutional
that he has a very beautiful colors back in the jungle as like a game to my own life and many interesting stories about him not all good it what it is but it's something you might as well enjoy th i don't know what to do but i must pay
what's your name be prepared beep beep beep beep beep to see one day and that i would say without knowing anything about it of course that mr malley is also a very able officer right because to pay our last respect until tonight then we'll let him have it i'm fed up with this we want to come to terms with it
changing defense counsel now just in the last couple of weeks now the change in counsel for the state just retired and so i have not had the opportunity to re that would have practically guaranteed that he'd be granted really and i can't tell you how much i disagree with that statement there the repetitive claim in this case is a promise that he would get probation and if you look at the fence testimony at the hearing here nothing in the record to support this claim that there was a reader off where it will be but if there was and it was made to his first attorney and that's what he said he says arguing you have to believe everything i say you have to believe that my second attorney promised me probation you have to believe that i was offered three year pl and yes just in conclusion mr ross was apparently from the rare surprise that his attorney will receive the issues that were so important i would argue that we know that because it was just a theory to after the hearing on the