related to pitchers lower back and a permanent total disability response filed a appeal to the commission and the commission stripped the petitioner of the permit total disability and a working twenty five percent loss of us these expensive records defender and they're saying it had no time during this job search the intent to locate a reply or a place that was actually higher so what do you have to say to their elected officials i would say that two hundred  had a previous dispute workers compensation gives the commission it back in the year two thousand and three and he got some restrictions from se in two thousand the commission found it is testimony regarding being able to get better and three he worked for three years at forty ironwork before going to work for the response two thousand six commissions still finds his testimony not credible even though the only evidence in this case of ballet that i have seen about him getting better shows exactly what there was a permit restrictions knock him out of his trade and then he is permanently totally disabled because there's no reason with stable labor market for him the commission's decision  it stays that they decline to accept the vocational evidence and back because they question the petitioner job search the only evidence in this case it is from susan and byrd that says said he applied the same job more than once which is a natural thing to do when you're applying for jobs within your area you apply to one thousand and seventy nine jobs you're gonna get the same place more than once at some point those things are going to happen the commission drew these facts out in specific we win out this way to make inferences against the petition in this case despite the medical evidence despite the occasional evidence and their decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence those the commission drew or could have drawn based upon the evidence in the record not the least of which was that this was again the system and it's interesting that the commission used that be obvious individuation go out on this record for example when the sun goes to his own doctor explode was it his own doctor because the doctor was getting ready to release him to return to work and this is now my doctor this serious treatment that can be just in a sincere way he lost his credibility in front of the commission because of things he did because of things he did and you know to keep we keep having him you know  i mean look there's no question that even he received this award the first came off based upon his inability to go back to work as an ironworker and within a very short period of time nancy to clean what he does to you major on the first case worker and then turn around and say we're going to deny him a wage differential and we're going to deny it because it centers upon the alleged wash of trade and that he can warm the workers and their workers he's apparently made similar allegations  accident and there was a causal relationship between nor in a word two hundred fifty six weeks of t t t so he must have been injured according to them and then turn around and they say that the adopt the opinions evidence to leave did then he can't work in the same position he was in on the day he was injured whether he should have been working at it position is fairly irrelevant because you take your you can explain the commission were lying on january twentieth only nine f c e which says the guy can't work as a man worker he can only do medium demand work but he was working as an iron worker in the day he was injured or so excuse me so now the question becomes if he cannot work in the same capacity was working when he was injured were guards with or should have been working at t this commission were to trace mismanaged every corner they had in a good village they believed he was gaming the system there's no question they believe them and there's no question there's a basis for their belief but i have difficulty understanding what you just heard was essentially the same type of muddying the waters that has been happening this entire case ignoring medical ignoring vocational just talking about how this man has had previous legal issues in the past he had  one previous worker's compensation case that keeps coming up it's settled on a disputed basis based on restrictions on in the year two thousand he went back to school do you work in two thousand and three because his treating physician released him to fully work