general to leary and islam and then you have two hundred two over allegations i'll talk about later but focusing on the first resources you have a natural source a federal informant or separate surveillance we don't know what the heroin was for and we don't know what the relationship of that woman was to larry there were there was no statement in the complaint that links this date information of those resources is useless because you don't know if it's still or not and i think the appropriate ways to look at this at this complaint is release excise that information from those resources and what you're left with with knowledge of how long you have to demonstrate present problem was look at this complaint see this elite affected because when you look at the allegations of criminal activity there's no days you don't know when it occurred and reasonably well trained officer would know on this day it's not really  you look at what's the first off national informant stated seahawks relating to officer lane and his knowledge in between those who complains when you look at the second complaint he ha made with regard to the first issue about the sufficiency of the search warrant it really didn't get argued in the trial court it was one of those things where we're going to get back to it we're going to back to it and they never got  i'm certainly not suggesting that wasn't preserved it was preserved but we're missing the benefit of arguments in the world order when you when counsel talks about  looking at is the way that it's written not how someone could rewrite also suggesting that selling drugs from home is as counsel suggest is not  sufficient but if you should find that it is not i think there really is a good  really do exist with reproach and the remedy here if you should find that the that the complaint for search warrant is insufficient in most cases that would be in real good assumption but it still is an assumption it's not an assumption for it for you to many satisfaction for me to make that assumption for anyone to make and show it gets back down and the local prosecutors decide if they either doesn't have standing to argue about we have tried all testimony under our belt in one of these cases and it may well be that this case could still be made without difference in the search and i don't think it's for th decision should be made here i think your decision is what your search warrant was issued and i hope you find that it was but if you find that it wasn't i think that the issue of whether the case can go forward or not goes back to the people who try to put the continuing there were there saying constantly and continuing this and that and back and forth between the two i don't see any information made this they see the surveillance sees it individuals going back and forth and that drugs are being sold from both apartments but i don't see any apartment go to the next combat and that there's anything other than the fact that individuals are out of this apartment and they are brothers you know that there are people going back and forth came back from larry's with the drugs that were you know purchased in the control of i mean i don't see anything that has a line other than these you know we have this ongoing information but the closest that there's and even up i'm going nature that that's discussed where there is to control purchases and that's in the in the first complaint that's in the but there's only one date that links that i mean it could have been one nine hundred eighty five that was the first one and then within seventy two hours or the second one i don't know the fabric i mean that's what i guess th confusing about that to me are concerns that concerns me about there being enough information about that it going back and forth i think there have to be something that the happened in a little bit and i'm going can't be ten years ago we met again today and i don't think there's anything when you read this complaint and i'm i'm looking at the complaint in this case not customers are milling around back and forth you also suggested well why didn't they do a controlled by i'm not sure but that's something you can do at the drop of a hat looking at least in this first issue here is whether what they did how you know we did it we could all run it it's not the issue is whether can be better be issues whether it's official and if it's and if there is any reason to believe that it's not whether it falls within the and we don't have that here we have the kind of questions that you raise as a defense attorney or you're pro quo poking at something and it's good it's good question reasoning but