doctor they found more persuasive but they found that he had a psychological condition of building where they said good he feel to prove that it is related to the accident of march two thousand big and the reason that he failed to do so because nowhere in the history is given to leave it we need mental health professionals who examined him or treated him or combination thereof that he opposition on this was very important to him because he's functionally illiterate and it was probably the only place where he was successful in life then literally in december of  rd all the others they didn't do that in this case the scene or i think they found that his psychological condition was related to the loss of his job and not to the actual accident  he's concerned he had problems with his ministration this teaching loaded cetera that teacher did not have a physical injury but become mission said what caused mr  do offer him a job so if you have a person with undisputed restrictions no work that they can provide for him this this mansion affable cation permanently and totally disabled and for then i signed into the hunter case were shop where the supreme court said that until prescribe rehab program was completed he could not be determin and that was a situation just as this one where the petitioner has immediately reached maximum medical improvement but easy to me of a vocational assessment the respondent in that case raised the same argument you can't have the p d because he's reached his condition has stabilized him and the court said they're ready and you last night second paragraph from the end  permanently and totally disabled and he said among those factors in his decision was the psychological condition so we look at the psychological condition if it's related then is it certainly relevant but the petitioners asking the court to reverse the findings you have a traitor in the commission the circuit court which found that there was no psychological causal connection between the second logical nearly three thousand pages in the record many many doctors offered opinions and testimony the fact is when there is conflicting opinions whether it's between lay witnesses or experts is a duty and function of the commission  developed psychological problems which some factors found in the original waxing what's the real problem here is that we have in the record and whichever trainer acknowledged different histories different sources of alleged psychological problems given to different doctors by the petitioner it's a commission's judge resolve those conflicts some of the doctor said that the second logical problems were not related it would not even existing and he had conflicting diagnoses some said he had behavioral problems which went only back to his days in school where he was placed in a special place rooms the resolution of the conflicts between the medical experts why and how did he report he's problems came about and we have different reasons and the way to the reasons i submit was probably determined by the commission including his complaints that the problem started not because of the injury to his back but because of personal reasons such as his alleged humiliation bears made when he was asked to read something from his coworkers they had allegedly triggered a panic attack and other psychological problems his findings well there's far more than just any evidence there's a huge number of a huge weight of credible evidence that supports their findings even the doctors that supposedly are supposed to help petition or offer opinions that he found his job was taken by another worker he said that his depression single episode was related to job loss he did not say his depression is related to his back accident he is a condition a personal condition quite quite successfully and he filled out a very complicated form we got in his job duties that the gentleman graduated from high school in the top one third of his class it defies common sense and logic for him to claim that he certainly not related to his back injury and even a factor so straightforward that this was a separate personal alleged humiliation has nothing to do with his back injury and he never sociedad then it was question but it's up to the commission it's their duty to resolve any conflicts in the record in the evidence in the medical testimony and they did that and like i said even petitioners own doctors offer opinions they could found to be against the petitioner dr howard embarrassment by people finding out what he could not read that led to his psychiatric condition x factor howard's testimony not that he had a back injury on his symptoms became severe and became very interesting embarrassed and that's when his symptoms began courting too mr crazy like we have to petition himself giving various histories their priest reasons when and why he was starting to suffer psychological problems and if they conflict and they do it's up to the commission to resolve this conflicting opinions but he's telling at least some of his own doctors that the source of his psychological problems school did not tell you why this man lost the job he lost his job because of his back injury he lost his badge on the job because of his back injury he watched it tara job because he didn't sight of the fact that the commission never said that we believe thinking hard over all of the others is they said he had psychological problems they said he you're off work you're not getting benefits you're going through this marital issues then surface until much later and i think it's quite understandable that that you would have those after a period of depression