individual places we think it's a dangerous one for invites in cases such as the additional conflict in confrontation as opposed to early resolution of disputes consistent with the purposes of  places properties they could not be developed anywhere near its intensity or scale if it were but for the fact that we're understating local law and outside the boundaries relief and what you have to demonstrate is a real concrete reason to believe that there's going to be a problem there's a danger the illustrations offered up well you would notify one it was this surge but it turns out the search was done by the sheriff who i'm questionably he said i think there were numerous and recent as i went through i frankly didn't count that many and this isn't a challenge to the jurisdiction of some an effort to prosecute based on one of the stops this is something that says in the future there's no jurisdiction that's a much different question so can't assume i don't think that the county would act but for this reservation question well the county where the county would have to ask we put it that way in the end for example the  county can act to oversee or if you tell me privately and if they do there's really going to be standing or if private citizens can act instead of the county the private citizens can take that action all we have here is a much more theoretical broad perspective determination without those concrete individualized particularized episodes that standing seems to as a matter of law requires well i would think it was a little differently you county oversight and that's the problem this development is going in without any county permits without any county oversight and there's no ability for planters to be able to challenge that except in this forum which is why they're here  port as an indian reservation and i want to quote the court the treaty of port eliot signed january twentieth two hundred fifty five created the port madison indian reservation and the half of i think that also as a matter of subject matter jurisdiction that there is no private right of action to diminish a reservation and the apartment has not shown any cases  regulatory program within the confines of the reservation some of the programs that the grant money set been used for can be identified in the record i hate as one sixty three to sixty four i may include a comprehensive water resources do they want the court to tell the tribal police to start making traffic stops and speeders drunk drivers if it turns out that those folks are portman members or if they are not indian charging and so the answer to that question is the traffic police have a right to stop a portland members and any other nine indians on the public roads the reservation the other thing that they would like and they have asked the court is to but that perpetrator may be an indian in which case the tribal police does have jurisdiction and should be there along with the tribal or it along with the sheriffs and that's why they're there and finally they're asking for this court to diminish indian reservation and there just isn't any i that action that allows for that so if they want to resolve the issue they need to come to terms with the fact that they live on an indian reservation and it is very complex as feet and they just have to deal with the reality of that it is not a situation where we can sit down and say all right we want to answer your nine one one calls because there are other nine indians who live on the reservation that definitely want t police to be there soon as possible thank you thank you are part of the reservation and therefore indian country and therefore we can make the traffic stops we can answer the nine one one calls and we can part of element any way we please so long as we on the progress it was really w requiring at a later stage of you get that far to prove up on the merits of there is a cause of action in your someplace and i can understand why she's not in a position to give ground on that returning to the standing issue there is that concrete and if we need more we're for the more it's just more confrontation because my clients will see a way out here but when you talking about harm is talking about a continuum for harm and we're talking about injury and the and the action is being challenged and we just want that opportunity relative yes twelve the threat of injury and for my class the fact that there has been injury they have been stopped when they believe they should not have been and this is one of the big problems for that that our clients are having especially with the housing project is that it's i feel on land and i don't buy the try several government gave money for that and the the construction is proceeding without any county oversight because the position taken by the federal government in funding that project and the position taken by the tribal officials as you have no jurisdiction