MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
applies in this case  this is a quiet street a quiet neighborhood that's a different thing from driving in the middle of the day in business district or something you might think at night yes now at two o'clock in the morning yes i appreciate what you're saying there in those cases though all those trees and the choice of the well founded evidently there was reckless homicide and first degree murder were appropriate morning and december twenty first it is it's extremely unlikely that a judge would be available at that time to tell me you're saying you couldn't find anyone or judges in cook county between twelve ten or twenty five and that was a search of somebodies apartment we're talking about the search of somebody's body here so i think you know that even higher burden should apply to the state just relented and provided for and just necessarily bears on the level of the intent to kill like this because the driver of the car cannot control the impact of the car collision in the same way as a person beating somebody or stabbing somebody can control the number of his or force the blows so the civilian with the impact in this case didn't necessarily bear on the level of intent in the way it has perhaps in some other cases the state also pointed to the fact that there was the there was you very much jim i would like to compliment the attorneys on their briefs through the net effect of this argument has taken fifty five minutes is evidence of how
aged ten of whom the parties were divorced after a while there was a there was a korean ship actually set up before the divorce state of april lost the guardianship the remedy you were looking are but they're there to be no other suggestion to the trial judge what she would do well i might be mistaken but i thought that there was i can't speak for the judge but there's nothing other than a very cursory objection to the removal she course also has there was no motion to remove children did you do was there an argument about removing the children at any point in time or was just that involved in the whole process
such a fashion i also don't know even if it was paper or how the endorsement process would be any different you would still need to change coverage from one vehicle to another and under the city right now and so that's why it needed to be an impact industry rise industry wide impact on the public at large given the fact that if there's a portion of cabs out there let's say  percent maybe it's twenty percent i'm not sure but if it's twenty percent that's what five cabs are striving iran without insurance coverage there is no way around that i mean isn't there way that contracts with insurance to make certain that same city regulations that apply some the city is aware of this coverage issue in the industry has not taken any steps to have the city address this lack of coverage  the policies have not been changed it's all at this issue i believe has been addressed by other brokers came in taxicabs it's just never gain any traction with the legislature and city of chicago council where whomever might be the particular vehicle may perhaps be seeing this right now that will cause them to but that's that's how i rather think that what would be cause regardless of how this case comes out i can't believe that there isn't some notice to the industry that this is an issue now squarely before the court i would like to think that you know rather than the front ring or attempting to modify the parameters of this coverage that there would be some opportunity for the industry to really press it becomes detrimental to rely on them to fire we make an appearance down defining the case then working the case out where we could have had the opportunity to hire counsel to move the case along we could take this deposition or try to take  most on is really the most important and that is the industry effect of this of this case and the industry practices in the city regulations i think that this happens with this case on me will certainly have an impact best the lines in which i would ask the justices to look at this case that it's something that needs to be done about the city policy which we believe him streams of the cab companies in puts them in a position where they have no choice but to follow those regulations or be told they can operate on the streets in there they're very much for being right now to even operate in the face of rubber much less these things these regulations that are potentially died i deny if it is it to basle think that for him to suggest that we have offered no evidence of how the contract and how the contract is don
especially when you're talking about a cash business because they had to have such a history of business before of how they probably process the cash and these are you close or are typically  debated but it wasn't necessary because then a trial finally she says yeah that's right i cashed it so it didn't need to go in there still because she admitted so this sets the table for a lot of things first of all now and i mean it is true i mean it is a record that you know the house is foreclosed on that real property was foreclosed on the business was foreclosed on all of which she had control of i can argue that so clearly were thinking at this point in time ok we're having problems meeting our obligations this is going to file a motion to modify because she could no longer make the payments because she wasn't getting money from mr brown mr brown is ask are we because presented was that she collected all the ranch from the rental property she collected whatever came into shippers and cheap paid maybe none of the payments and they were both for posed on you don't think that make to a threshold of her explaining two of them they had you know seventy seventy nine thousand dollars a year in income and i don't think it's unreasonable especially because the work we see maybe contemplated in the price of gas would be going away to try to keep the children in the same environment where they have so i
finally the testing here has a potential to produce materially relevant evidence
investigations in court mar
purchase delinquent debt from the original creditors this is chase and c day those types of credit card companies and then goes and tries to coll midland refused to answer in any way put you on notice that they were seeking information about more than one playing defense more than m do not know i do not think it did put us on it is that information for the reason i asked is you all filed a motion for protective order yet and it said in a motion for a protective order that you didn't want to release information about anybody else except mr hooker so i was just wondering why you would make that argument rather asking you to prove somebody something about somebody else ok the basis of that clearly visible i notice you talk about the bold headings is is that your position on appeal here that this is one of the reasons you should be in forces because everybody can see it read it know about it yes it is  class or serve as a class representative or a member of a class so are you asking this court to just carve out the class allegations and let you proceed under the full language of the arbitration agreement benefits services or products in connection with the accounts including credit banks merchants court was trying to quit requiring us to because you know i'm i'm curious how you can take that position because you filed first and then the defendant filed two motions to well to provide that information so you didn't file a motion to compel the perpetration until like eighteen months or more after you first filed the complaint and sinker county right after you guys chose the poor we filed in march you comply with arbitration x the to a valid contract but that contractual defenses apply that and so my question to you is the impatiently got a waiver clause that perpetually enjoins your client from from all certain actions but as a practical matter places the plaintiff in the situation in a position where they can never waive their right to  hundred twenty five or twenty seven i don't remember which and maybe the courts were hostile but we've come a long way since then i mean i think they were using muskets back then so you know but let me ask you a question about  just before we recess to have you are either of you aware of the case out of the first district that was recently decided on the issue of waiver in arbitration agreements have you
have shows on the back of the building with no way to get a good view of the one that it's all thrown off i'm anyway so they say don't be silly brother to school district requests for time extension for construction of a two story building with a ten thousand square foot footprint which we've never seen anything is to renovate our ira allen building for a preschool center for various different reasons we changed directions and we started my first term and we designed the concept of having a south in preschool avenue or these two north and south and preschool sites that pre k committee is their goal is to make a recommendation to our board by april so this is the reason why i'm asking for this extension because this t project isn't necessarily dead in the water in the we're still in the process of moving forward to make up a firm decision or we're going to go with this is a three month extension realistic correct but my understanding is we have the option for two extensions and you need to show progress so we're showing progress at least at this stage if we get to april and show more progress than than that would be the need to add that extra time approval from this board their building was a little bit larger than the thirty thousand square foot limit that they were allowed and we kind of had to go through some fortunes about all right well will separate this office space oh yes i have a couple more for you but that didn't include just what you're you have everything that anyone here tonight except for the density calculation
the trial were as far as i understood it was simply disagreeing with that case and i believe they were referred specifically
don't know that in thirty years of practicing in this area of law that i completely grasp this concept but that's what we're here today and if it didn't when i was reading over the briefs and convincing but that testimony is contradicted and inconsistent with the contemporaneous down the evidence all medical records and business records as well as with this testimony that's consistent specific incident occurring at work i'm february eleventh two thousand and eleven while he's operating a hand check and when you look at what someone supplied in this record and there's some big record there's a lot of evidence in this record one supports that the because when we filed our notice of appeal the circuit court's order to this court and we went to the clerk of the circuit court and cook county they said we don't have a record and then they went back and they're proud and they see that the commission never found the record identical research the same same judge to enter the decision confirming the commission's decision on march thirteenth of two girls and fourteen counters in order on july the fifteenth two thousand and fourteen ordering that appear on the record be prepared and filed with the clerk it was the same judge i was directed by the clerk of the court who handles the appeals to go back to that charge and hand him calculation because there were there were seven there were two documents and one of them was the respondents exhibit number two in the record and it's the typically indicated in that evidence that the there was an error that we wanted the court to address and anticipating that the argument would be from the claimants which had been the argument at the commission a lot of feeling that the circuit court level that they should have been  he doesn't state he doesn't state and he knew when this occurred much less any particular date he had a different time he stated that there was no conversation with the claimant at their time which is what the difficult it's a difficult standards are high it's a high for i i guess my house would be how it's manifest when it's a balancing on one side you know we have this this testimony about this very specific incident and on the other side we have a see twenty six of the reports betty does say that he does have this conversation with mr cortez worry said that yes he did feel poppy is back after he grabbed his back i did this plenty of evidence to yes she does say there were ten shouldn't there should not be not be included and then she goes on to explain how she arrived at her calculations she acknowledged that there was some discrepancy between
matters the point is they could be from someone they had no relationship with to put an end to their bank account and then they moved it over to someone else who is a new customer of theirs who they have a new relationship with rely upon a cry joint commission in order to establish their case and as this court is well aware judge connect i know that you have been involved in many cases involving  relationship whatsoever it's conceded that my haid was not a customer she was in a banking customer she was in no way shape or form connected to had been chalons there was no relationship that would give me the there is one with friends as he knows the traveller's case he said they're talking about fraud in this travellers case if you look at that case they were talking about the fraud the wrongdoer they're not talking about now this is a fraud with listening to the argument today it reminded me because there are certain characterizations that are not supported by the record they are d time detail but my in my motion they draw and there may be no ability to track them down and you can imagine that would do it in the stream of commerce to for them to not only track them down but that is this your granted a summary judgment because in the absence of an element of fraud claim and left it at that
but but as far as the public policy that would be the only way it could have been determined credibility she'd have to be saying i believe the defendant when he says he didn't cross the law right and book clearly if you read the definition of improper lane usage there has been nothing provided by the state to show in any manner that someone was put in jeopardy because it does provide the vehicle should not be moved from feel so so if it says if it's as clear as you say this was about credibility isn't it just as clear in that statement that she was reading the statute that required some kind of safe movement certainly understand
if he ever appear in court to follow a motion to dismiss or raise the issue that they're proceeding against the wrong person he had no reason to your honor he was a registered as now he did the after judgment against the barbary on the corporation there's also a judgment against ron where it was possible to go after one run a civil war and then kind of in the middle of the situation turn around and try to force it also against my client ron because you know on the application for the that i mean is it was there any evidence presented at all in the prove up or anything as to who made the application either all that's one third in the record at all or ok received service because in his affidavit he clearly state that this corporation high are in research is my father's corporation i have nothing to do with it i have nothing to do with the credit card accounts those are my father's i am the registered agent corporate that it was properly served it was partly served on a registered agent there was no way for her client to know that he was obese or individually when he received the complaint from the american ex that it was intended against the corporation there was no evidence there it would be against him since he in his own knowledge understood that he had nothing to do with american express account we'll have the record we'll go through and he's the only person who had this information that he claims he had and he did not do anything to resolve the situation but the person we have we have a corporation i
ineffective assistance correct and no appeal from that that so we're not going to collaterally attack on direct appeal i hate b s corpus finding that was never peed on ineffectiveness it was never direct appeal we will not because there is no record and we'll wait for hay vs where haiti is has already been tried and you've lost and there's a ruling that there was no ineffectiveness the way to remedy that is an appeal from that hey vs decision not to seek to always happens because we know there is a hate to follow where the record will be developed here the hay vs preceded and there was at least one court that had addressed the hey b s and then no
and you're splitting your time right for all purposes pro or is responsible for outside supervision which is such an argument what purpose is there by doing is the very first cause of the here wait to the first cause if it's not supposed to be limiting subsets that is if it applies the pro up a supposed to be a paid off in the bailouts or something like that what does this record before the show and what should we i should review well i suppose the more specific this case would be it seems to me a different response than queries from plato he said gee i don't know especially if i don't i don't know what's going on spots more appropriately did this is it within the scope of my services for you i don't know where this deficiency comes trouble why it's present
employees screening pilot
employees were not licensed they have what was called a permanent employee registration number that is not a license that does not make them a private detective and that even they were appointed to private detective agency was appointed section two to all five  personal service should not apply in this case because the trial for has to not just look at the return service has to consider entirely in the record before him and net includes the motion that was filed asking for the appointment court or for the defendant to be concerned about the fact that they do this was their responsibility it wasn't that it wasn't that hard for the temp agency to be licensed point the purpose of the sections to ensure that the process is served by somebody who is whol somebody who's licensed somebody who is on that we can in the faith and trust in that the service problem and its regulated work yes well well i've been regulated to the purpose is to make sure that the people who do the are contradicted i hear counsel saying well you know whether there was an emergency the reason she was permitted this question affect certainly that would sound like something that would go back for the jury here and it's of those interests are implicated here nothing bad is going on in from the record throughout the time of the foreclosure setting there's nothing to show me anything that would even two completely opposite positions in the trough or in term to take advantage of that five
point the house was going to be so so it doesn't seem to me that the court took into account his month is increasing monthly income once the house will be so he actually ref assuming she buys something that and she's going to immediately have to eat into support to do anything she's going to have to buy health insurance i mean even to afford to pay for a numbers we actually look at the numbers and split them up in and look what he got there says she got my calculation shows the husband got eight thousand dollars to the better
problems let's imagine that the risk from a particular pesticide is incidence of cancer in ten in a million people this is by very very close to how many that is why we always have to go back and look at the epidemiology da educating i have to tell you that can you hear me sorry pay attention to the precautionary principle which tells us that when there is risk seek an alternative because it was what i was going to open my heart to talk with that seemed serendipitous to me so i'm going to talk to you about alternative is to using toxic things in containers which might make us sick and instead think this oil and plant some plants and we're going to start talking that is trash which can turn into compost which is a cornerstone of my methods to this garden and yard waste and kitchen waste including a shelf except for cats and meat allowed to age and decompose into wonderful fry and the light brown substance that can be used for growing plants and what it is further there is the result of microorganisms working on material they eat up those other things i just took it out and the next things are because of worms so all those creatures were this pile of trash that we have we just just to leave it there sitting and dig out from the bottom we don't want to get real dry and we want to test some sign that it doesn't have to have a whole lot  whitley's when it's finished or almost finished it can be used when it's almost finished because it can continue to degrade effie's start to use a particular human living particularly if you're laying it on a garden or have and it is then used as an alternative to chemical fertilizer because chemical fertilizer and this isn't something that draws other insects and then those insects emit pheromones remember paul rodgers diagram all those insects coming in a great way through the year this one little diseased lamb so also handouts then you denounce in the rap have all the ways of dealing with insects and disease on plants and i'm not going to speak of it all because i could never in the microorganisms in the soil that are helping it to be healthy so it's better not to use or besides plus herbicides and access from home and getting to where waterways these successfully used by a lot of people it's not successful after you use it for three years the directions given you i think that it has to be they have to be i think you have to take very good care of them want to procure them from this is why i have not had experience with them but i do know that it's effective and they it's good for getting anything from the sun to help the roots live you could also with rubber gloves and maybe newspapers that you put between you and the poison ivy this is the way i do it even if you can't really do these seizures there are increasing numbers of landscape means professionals who have been treated in the northeastern my son asked me that this afternoon just th they common sense by using
the very diverse that amazing grin right here i don't see white cookie like jewish or anyhow shanghai story on me i invented it down is the medicine you're nothing i'm not very hungry he does not like my cooking or it is not that he does not like me you think i am not your friend because i wanted to hand you that away but some day you'll thank me for saving you please one two three please don't bounce back to three front two three very good excellent told you that was that they're not going to
members of our panel bradley mays directly the director of compensation and pensions service of the veterans benefits and u s department of veterans affairs accompanied by dr patricia hay chief consultant it's post traumatic stress disorder claim we do have a mechanism to differentiate from other types of we have what's called an end product modifier and in our system we can we can segregate out will have to take for the record i don't have information on that but again i can give you a breakdown of male and female veterans that have been granted