think you're on your own if the court should remain in this case to determine the impact of recent cases defining redefining the ties for particular social group the term particular social group is quote unquote targeted because of us have alleged membership in a particular social group are rather as for charlie ish another way it's whatever social group they're saying he doesn't he hasn't demonstrated that he's been targeted because of it as opposed to because he's a police officer or because he's has or whatever as you know who was shooting him and so on so they seem to be saying whatever social group it was he has made out his case  with before the immigration judge that portion was really not fully explored meaning the judge rejected political the judge would reject that particular social group right off the bat and the judge never analyzed whether the former officer mr bunny had been a good life would be in danger for risk a future persecution and therefore another problem is that and no time that he was in honduras was he a former police officer right was almost only after he ran away laughter he quit and left he didn't quit he ran away right away ok so he was never a former police officer while he was in honduras right but what well that's i think that's pervasive across all the cases your honor no time i think that would be pervasive across all the cases that there is a member of either a police of the police force or of the military issue is because of the two failed attempts on his life within three months time he had no choice but to leave if he would have stayed any longer in honduras he perhaps may have never had the opportunity to be quote unquote former police officer is the basic problem a just doesn't know who was shooting at him so he really can't establish a reason the motive right that was one of the issues that the court below other while a good majority of the other officers had already been turned and and he was afraid that it was the other officers that were shooting at him he knew of other officers so he may have not been able to individual you identify who it was that was shooting at him but he knew that it was either the people who didn't want him the people who didn't want to be on the force anymore the people who he had stood up against so he knew it was one of them that was shooting at him without knowing the individual identity on the council's judge called if i could ask you this question who has the burden of proof on the issue of nexus there's to prove that when he shot that it's on my count of his code for membership that would fall on the petitioner your honor however when in this case petitioner was on the force for two years he didn't have any incidents then all of the sun one day when he's asked to look the other way and he says no i won't do that then he's then his there are two attempts on his life within three months i think he's showing the nexus it's because he stood up and he said no i won't look the other way and that's so now he's a former policeman house how does that tie to a nexus well you know i think the fact that he he stood up to them that's the nexus argument right there he is there any evidence of it but the evidence to be that they were trying to get him not to be a policeman but no they were trying to get him to either go along with some or to not be a police cell now he's not a policeman was this problem well we see it we see that there were two attempts on his life  good morning brant hogan so the government in this case the two i'm sorry after you wondering probably it's really important thank you in this case the review petition should be denied for the reasons that your honor has already identified first and foremost unfortunately in this case the petitioner can't show a nexus to the incidents that he experienced in honduras he can show that his status as a police officer was one central reason for the the two incidents where he was shot at first there's a temporal problem  was approached by x police officers on three occasions the first two times they said you're going to let this cargo through a checkpoint and on the last occasion they said if you don't stop being a police officer we're going to arm you know it's unclear how long after that the shooting occurred furthermore after he was shot on the first occasion the men that approached him asking him to leave the police force they never approached him again they never came up and said we did it this is your last there was no connection between these men and the incident and finally he couldn't identify who the shooters were he said himself most of the time join us testimony it might have been gang members it might have been organized crime it would have been ex police officers he simply doesn't know as for again you are and i think it's important to know that he's not claiming protection as a result of the status as an officer alone because he is not getting what protection of a result of persecutors believe that he you know that he is going to whistle blow for that he is a whistle