immigration judge to conclude that your client was mistreated because of her political opinion is it plausible or rational help us understand whether your client recorded the effort to commit the wife of the powerful man mr commit to the psychiatric hospital who are it whether it's your client who reported that to the police and thereby triggered the actions of the police against her or whether it was mr commit who commit would not have targeted her and that is shown by the fact that every time that she encountered that ron or his wife and tried to help her immediately thereafter she was targeted in some way doesn't make a difference factors in in the sense that she wasn't an activist pertaining a political opinion she was simply a doctor who in her encounters with the patient tried to help that patient and as a result the patients husband would play with the police and they basically told her to drop the case and withdraw the complaint but there's no evidence that they did that on account of a political opinion certainly you know he has some power but at that point he was actually governor in fact a lot of political opinion is it your argument that the rape is sufficient evidence for that but this was a judgment call and because of the differential standard of review we have to wait for my argument is that sm in college or as a hospital administrator there's no evidence to show that he cared anything about other than her interactions with that run in fact there were years in between their interactions so she was not harmed you know every month or every day or every year she was only targeted when she encountered celeron so the fact that he became governor you know certainly gave him a little bit more power and even more reason to hide this marital abuse but it did not change political season a political opinion it's sort of been you know five or ten other women that were involved in and health care that he had gone to gas with that have  that there was an immutable group that had social distinction all the facets of particular social group as required under the law then perhaps the board of niger could have assessed that in the first instance but we do not have that here we have a private citizen who is involved in a personal matter and was retaliated against for getting herself involved in that matter and in fact her son statement even her son's testimony makes clear that torture the evidence shows that mrs could relocate to another part of ukraine or she failed to show that she could not relocate excuse me in fact she returned to ukraine in two thousand and four for several months back to her hometown and was not her armed based on the record she also presented no evidence in the country conditions report that there was a vast extent of his power and influence throughout the country conditions report what is the rel more on the lack of future persecution at least according to the eyes of the just hundred constrictor issue the country conditions are poor really focus more on the convention against torture analysis but it really provided no evidence at all in the stricken that was not even mentioned in that report and the evidence that her burden was not met in regards to the convention against torture certainly that i did recognize that sexual assault is a form of standard the greater than fifty percent standard required for proving that she would likely be tortured  in regards to the past persecution finding the board also did not care in that regard three incidents involved in the hospital in which she with special defended certain individuals or one individual who was apparently fired for maternity leave purposes that did not rise to the level of past persecution she was still able to find another job she was not severely harmed by that