support that in addition to the award that was granted by the jury now in this case your own and the only time to fully was solely with him in physical contact with m sanchez was during the process of utilizing the phones for the memory and the warnings and the evidence at the trial of point in time was mr c h s was expressing some difficulty in either understanding or had either side or mr sanchez who was here cuffed at the time and bit as a guided tour through the door that led to this other walk where the cells where one of the officers was knocked off at this point in time my client was following no evidence in this record that he was shoved into the toilet there was the there was allegations made by counsel but the plaintiff doesn't say at all that he was shoved into the toilet there is no evidence presented by any witness that he was sho he doesn't even mention being into the cell and i suggested it's based on that evidence that a jury of reasonable jury would have been able to find that my client was responsible for the head injury and the head injuries that was from which the image who happens to be there i guess maybe for some other booking procedure but he he does testify those are not the injury occurred where they were when the individual merit understanding of what's going on there's a confusion the next thing there happens is he's told that he can get counsel apparently he walks away from the front brake booking table where the telephone system do them you cannot force me you cannot force me to do what you want me to do it in addition to that as americans the two other troopers convert into the into the booking room protel takes the left side words intentionally bumped against a do or jam or he's not sure if he was simply bombed so he could not make he could not distinguish whether this was an intentional  were some type of events accidental act the important thing i think that goes to the heart of the conspiracy is there this is not part of the police narrative the police ignore this portion of the pla wall because he put this hammer so we know that something happened at the entrance of the norm in this sense that traders of extreme importance because there is a statement they give can be here as they g on and in the recordings are present so once they go into the room the most unusual thing happens you hear this is six seconds into entering the room were to her  sanchez starts saying big kill me he kill me i'm bleeding from the head or whatever else he says where they can say they were working for immediately let's make this look like a fall and so to that extent i think there's ample evidence of a conspiracy and there's ample evidence to support the remaining findings the expert testimony also w that at some point in time as this sound and there were some type of agreement and part of the agreement is to support this we dig us the erie that my client falls inside of the cell here's another important thing did all three for the next thing that happens after the city or all the fact there's about a nd twenty six seconds of silence where i suggested to the jury on a i needed to cooper folio cross around so you can get with just occur unless a court of there is any other questions on the conspiracy i like to move briefly to the other elements in this particular case the judge the jury was probably instructed on damages and medical records were presented medical expenses were presented to the jury the jury did not take except in all of the medical expenses of the plaintiffs there were about a one thousand three hundred dollars instead of giving him better entire figure they agreed to pay down eight thousand dollars there's nothing extraordinary about the verdict here in this case which added up to about seventy eight thousand dollars  the assault and battery standard there was enough evidence in this case the trooper fully exercise using reasonable force as he brought him particularly if we accept the profession intended to inflict emotional distress on my client and we also provided in volume three medical records from a greater lawrence hospital his primary care clinic where he indicated that he thought conspiracy or believe all of it because of requires more than just presence there has to be some type of tacit verbal agreement between the parties and i suggested it no point in time to seriously evidence of that that was presented at the trial and therefore that