he moved to another village where he became a leader of the shiite religion in that village he was arrested in one thousand idea during this period of time is parents home was burned down in his members of the majority sunni religion and soldiers of israel going back to my earlier statement this is an unusual case because it's unusually well documented many times these cases are presented and there's no supporting documentation in this instance supporting documentation show that he was in fact registered as a shia muslim that he wasn't fact leader  that mr hussein had been arrested and detained for about four or five months and had been badly treated by the police and that in the arrest warrant had been issued in one thousand nine hundred seven which is the year that he left and this testimony was crime read by his sister in the darkness as she was then living in the united states as a permanent resident alien she was in the process of getting a divorce and the average witness against mr hussein was for strange husband for which she had obtained a restraining order and right after she obtained there were he wrote immigration and said that he would be an average witness against mr hussein at the end of this testimony the judge never made specifically any credibility findings what he stated was that having heard the testimony he the ones that the court should focus on of those and go to the heart of the asylum claim here whether or not he applied previously for asylum in canada prior to applying for asylum in the united states it would be our position that and in this case not only the judge not specifically making average credibility fine he didn't do that and totally ignores all of the substantial documentation that's present in this case it's our position that applying the standard of whether or not the average credibility finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record that in this record it is not supported it's not even close to being supported and they have but for the adverse  credibility finding that there was substantial evidence presented in the form documentation and to witnesses of religious persecution based on him being a member of a minority muslim group and in pakistan which  i would say it's not directly contradictory but as we move forward through the rhetoric taken as a whole it supports the basis it is substantial it leaves a substantial record evidence supporting the immigration judge determination that this petitioner lacked credibility so as i as i move onto the record the petitioner call he called his brother in law and said i wish to come united states to find work at that time he did not mention a basis of religion or persecution on that so that is directly contradictory to the the reasons why she came and application he checked political of ten not religious religion was not checked as a basis of persecution but between at some point in time he decided maybe my best bet is religion so now we get so finally the guy as the government noted in the street she was asked multiple questions about his knowledge of the shia religion and the immigration judge found that it was this goes not only to his credibility but to the heart of his claim at this point that he was persecuted based on his religion finally the state department profile under my eyes to issues explanations of the sh religion that the because the pakistani government in the country report states that it's quick to respond to religious violence and at that the shia members of the lies because i wasn't really a religious person that goes directly to the heart of his plan and i would ask and state that the petitioner has