MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
was able to get into the organization into the to the upper echelons of the organization and find out who those people were that they could not learn where the drugs were stored where we are for additional stash album which as far as i know were never surveill there's no evidence of disease surveillance on the other stash houses there's no evidence that there was ever he surveillance with respect to following the guest brothers or the other the other gentleman from the from the heart an address to wherever the drugs were held to have done something else when they've given us reasons for why they felt that that's all surveillance was limited and for why because of the nature of the family and or linking it w i'm just talking about basic law enforcement techniques which were not employed based upon the vast amount of information they had prior to asking for this first larger council if you're finished on that point  this exact total punishment question was raised to help me on something that you know i think we're on the same row here on the right ok so i want to go back to our stand because that's obviously a key case in your argument transaction archdale right forget all the cases you're just trying to read the guidelines and you're trying to look at the stats from x from which you just say well in the story i can't go you know the government can't come in and say g play in that particular case ok unequivocal he said this is what we understand total punishment to be i think you should not discount that part of the explanation by the way i i was wondering then about your discussion  that they're basically saying within that range that was ok for the judge to give him the sentence correctly yes and that discussion and a definitive statement the relationship between the so you take the maximum on one count and then you stack upwards to reach somewhere within the guidelines range shows them to sentence the defendant on exactly what they said then that's what they did in jet ski minority they talked about a possible apprentice and buckland and then looped back to archdale and said well we have one hundred forty five months and he serves six so that's gets him to one hundred fifty one and that's in his guideline range and therefore they make a comment at the end we couldn't published well thank you very much counsel your time has expired court because you have a large deal and you relied on quite reasonably but then we also have jet ski and that whole line of cases where what should we do so far as the bars concerned if you clarify the issue for i think the proper for the morning and we will judge hall i have our conference immediately following our german thank
below the ground and they're part of that first for elevation but then there's also the fork and then whatever else needed to be built up to meet that elevation how to comply if one were to look at it in a vacuum i would agree with that but there's a very easy remedy for that to revisit the office before you extend substantial resources and you know permit that contains the same thing rather than excusing yourself from that requirement and right in this regard doesn't make that directive but the concession isn't what defeats that i think you have to consider the case as a whole and in doing so much of your efforts would be wasted if you had to if you could ordinances which has its own specific procedures even for the
issue number two deals with the statements of evidence five prosecutor in closing argument is this statement were incomplete state and the prosecutor says he didn't flow because he knows he's guilty how is it different from our own consciousness of guilt is because i'm not sure i stand tall but there is a case that says that that you can shift the burden and i'm saying i say if you say that  know she's guilty i refute those cases that say they are the ones where the prosecutor gets up there any and here she argues the defendant could have taken a breath test and given you the evidence that you need to plead him but he this case does not involve complex facts not it had really only one contested issue which was whether the defendant was under the influence and or to witness something each side and the testimony was not linking so which is correct he did request graham which is also true but they're important part is his main pick complaint here is the fact that the jury is getting to decide and that is based on so it's not a situation where the defendant objected to the this particular issue whether the trial court abdicated its decision making role of the jury it's actually even more than just  on this particular ground and in allowing this to go to the jury without action so so for both of those reasons defense would not be entitled to any relief from the appeal by raising this new theory on appeal for the first time in effect one that is actually different says alternative explanations for the various incriminating facts in the record the circumstantial evidence of his appearance those may not be accepted the less they are the only reasonable inferences from the record so when he claims anger for to the police officers does everything they ask and he gets arrested anyway so i mean i think you could argue that that would be reason he might behave the way he did once he said well that's the idea is traffic stop talks about two hours and two hours and adding those together when i arrive at ten am or ten pm and so there's no situation where although he wants to be an awesome say well it was eight thirty or maybe nine it's  respect shifting the burden there is nothing like the statements in the jackson case where the closing argument referred to the defendant's opportunity to hers to prove his own innocence well that is what c
supreme court's earlier observations in metropolitan versus massachusetts and other decisions that was that regulate claims that just in practices are central i don't like the business of insurance which is the old based on the statutory language based on the supreme court's decision early decision in franchise tax board as well as the most recent rash decision that simply isn't true i'm explaining why it would be implied preemption under the civil law enforcement provision and he said this he said the conflict arises when the state remedy would significantly significantly expand the scope of ultimate action passed and welfare benefit plans i gather purpose was to protect the beneficiaries of interest and benefits under those plans what the supreme court has said is that there would be no need for the savings clause to take insurance laws out explained that we really never have applied those as a fundamental or essential part of the past they are mere guidepost for checking points and again the court cited title quite finally in the last and most importantly the l paragraph of the opinion in unseating this new two part test the court cited most prominently it's kind of like the first prong of the new killer miller test is whether the street was specifically directed at the insurance industry argument he trashed companies of the century thinking back itself onto employers to argue that they can't be held liable for unfair and deceptive trade practices in fact the argument goes like th let me give you an analogy because i think it shows the separate harm that might count as laws are designed to stop somebody comes into my house and steal something from me and after a year or all i get through a court proceeding and i prove that they took my property and then they say if i just give your property back feel let's call it square is that what's going to happen the like how does that encourage him ploy or so i offer a group plan in fact what you have now in this country are two different sets of standards for insurance companies that i go by my plan they have to comply with laws that prevent them from being dishonest but if my employer provides it for me they can engage in such tactics and i say finally get caught which they did in this case they say everything is made good if you just get the money back
is a really good actionable misrepresentation fraud deception here in the common sense of the word i mean i i did you know i don't know four seconds a seem like a lot but a lot of these other cases you can understand it how the an act or why the actor of cases that are filed every one of them must be investigated in some way whether through this cover or anything else see if if the misrepresentation as here i think judge  consumers believe that every lawsuit is is valid or has been research could be that these just hitting consumer thinks that there are a lot of frivolous lawsuits around there and they're being sued  communicates the thought that an attorney has reviewed the case and determined that legal action is appropriate and haven't we established a standard not i don't think it's a meaningful involuntary but it is a standard as to wh so for the sake of making sure that lawyers have meaningful empowerment we have lawsuits brought i guess lawyers based on the suspicion the perhaps they didn't have meaningful involvement but was there any
that the last of the capital number three supply room is cleaned out good frequency sounds sounds so high we can't even hear it that is anything about over twenty thousand cycles that's right but this machine is capable of producing a hundred of the seventy five kilometer if i go wow that's that's about one hundred seventy five gunpowder oh you mean  calibrations over a thousand years ago crime and i did know that the chinese are responsible for a lot of things people don't know about for instance they do know that the ancient chinese invented paper and actually printed books on it now and that they developed water cocks to tell time and were the first to use paper money kali how do you know all these cat most unusual practice but most valuable to census taker and to police who may want to know  good day will soon and thank you for your courteous reception h strange to me i'm afraid the explanation would be even more strange wi fi there isn't time you've got to get away from here at once and warm cup of coffee about a plot against his life to go right his life is in danger and i still have some distance to travel good work at banks castle but you know mark a policy of the value of a book of is almost more than is why was it that important it turned out to be most important that especially when read by men like magellan
he's going to do now just beat up his reactions a little before the next t you're already going too fast for me captain yes so our job is to and they vary quite a bit yes but the great pyramid one on the right there was an area of over twelve acres and it's almost fifty stories high fifty stories high that's right solid mass of stone blocks weighing hundreds of tons of peat how could be delivering like that without machinery and tools manpower for nearly thirty years practically the entire population of egypt was forced to drive those huge stones into place and fit them together but who forced a line a king or pharaoh so that his body would have a proper resting place after he died that pyramid was to be his t  three thousand years after they've been sealed up tight nothing was found but an empty coffin and yet there was no openings through which anything could have been taken out what happened everything that was inside no one no maybe we can will take ten tons of blasting powder to get inside of this thing oh i think i can go on here somewhere secret entrance fifteen million blocks in this thing and you're going to look for a secret entrance i don't know roger we're going to find out if a mummy of key ops was ever actually brought in here but i don't watch it roger ah know that's why the pyramid was empty three thousand years later yeah but what i can't understand is what lifted that block and carried it out of the king's tree kept those pre
when we arrive at this eleven o'clock in the morning saturday we are we expected to only be tackling a brief argument on the motion to dismiss and we believe back in his statement was that cooper is to be including the words since no allegations have arisen over the past several months therefore there must not be any remaining issues it's interesting to know that during the test soon enough with two individuals that the respondent was allowed to produce the testimony of the mother come most of the time and i believe we were made clear that this is a last longstanding conflict between the parties involved and over the course of time if the ride if there is a partial hearings were held however if the the standing argument level the first step in the process is the burden of the petitioners to prove by a prepon the evidence that the biological parents are unable to care for their ability to day basis in support of that group subsection  a case that type of information that can be allowed in that standings hearing arguments specifically allowing for the introduction of
also i want to fully equipped with atomic weapons guided missiles and a food supply for thirty days including plenty of striver reply and ice cream arco you want to  destruction of the new outer space platform and i would like it completed before my return from venus in the meantime micro your mrs me with my experiments in time and space  yet i discovered i have royal blood in my veins is that any different than the ordinary car and certainly i'm related to came all i sent away from my genealogy everything besides i've always known i was a lost prince or something you sound a little lost all right i'm sorry captain but i'm afraid i have to give up all this sort of three then but i can make a cycle reactor the danes cannot attack us in these bugs in marshes besides as yet they know not even where we are but i fear the time will come my load when they will discover us by then we must to phone the means to drive them back when they  would that we have the time to find the mea thin we can no longer hope to defend us and thank heaven for the swamplands to hide us from our enemies until we can regain the strength to fight them strength may be long coming many of our people have given up hope they have lost the desire to resist and their hopelessness is spreading the king doesn't see himself they say he does not care what becomes of us that  blow but who can blame them over and over the crops of the the churches pillaged and destroyed their homes leveled to the ground and they themselves robbed and persecuted who can blame them for losing faith in a king who was supposed to save them may have could be best if i left the shores may have been time the danes and sections would come to live together in peace peace that would make slaves of all sexes better to fight now and die in battle than such a peace know the time will surely come when we shall be strong again until then we can both wait wait but even now waiting could be cut short but the danish evens find out they know that while you live you are still a threat and they seek revenge for past to feed every gain on the shore six you are like for the one who destroys you would be with reward if this secret place would be posted about the camp i have no fear of surprise g ok jet take me back devastated country a country overrun by savage pirates and rapidly sinking into the depths of barbarians from there he built a nation offered not only drove out the thing jeopardy stablished just law built schools and churches translated books and then he wouldn't waste time even devised a clock by dividing a candle into equal space man must of been working day and and
material facts are withheld that are not rights as affordable as well how does that n and when you say there is no if it's not them to continue to deal with each other openly and honestly i don't think the fact that the people have attorneys assisting them so in any rate diminish their their duty is to continue to deal with each other i honestly and there's a strongly disagree with
within a rabbit there's nowhere still basis for doing so and for no reason at minimum this should be returned to the trial court for additional post convention proceedings here defendant was only sixteen years old and may have had maybe not been able to see the foreseeable consequences of participating in the first of the film but we didn't know one of his accomplices didn't tell him before they went into the house a murder probably going to happen different mr participated in this defendant specifically knew in this case whether he was developmentally challenged or not he specifically knew the record before
involuntary manslaughter and first degree murder these comments really were something insidious for the jury his ability to make a fair decision and the state recognizes that it's improper for prosecutors to appeal to the victim's rights or the defendant knew the guy was capable of functioning he had a problem is that both of these types of errors encourage conviction based on sympathy the first imploring the jury that you have to get a first degree murder conviction specifically to to right argument for the state present a big picture i cannot get into the mind of why this prosecutor chose to handle her case the which did you agree with the original statements opposing counsel that the state from december of two thousand and one of the home is that relevant to this shooting very mild relevant certainly but and that and quite honestly given the fact that the jury terrible tragedy this was an intentional murder that had been coming for years and i think that's prejudicial and that isn't back to her there and i also think you know the things that came up during closing argument those are some of the last
accompanied by a finding that there is quote no just reason for delay only an appeal period close quote however they apparently has confused requirements of the annoyed supreme court room three o four with the requirements of supreme court rule three zero seven moreover a second attempt at a second bite of the same apple in the practice of the wall should be examined under the statues must represent the particular room modification client in a bankruptcy law for its composition and the statute clearly doesn't say that interestingly the plaintive has never denied all know what they're talking about and that i don't know obviously that's that's a dispute but within the context of the facts of this case they're human it is the people whose what your clients were  for purposes of this his or her interaction with a particular set of customers in a it was a situation not the practice in mind that context i think that's what they were saying here that i don't think they denied that your clients are attorneys no i didn't see anything like that in the record what they were saying is they may be attorneys but they want that but that's not what they were doing in the context of these of these five well first of all you have to look at the statute and  attorneys normally do which is by the small which is i represent clients which is true correct i retain their for the representation of the client which is consistent with the practice of law my clients at all times they were subject to the rules of professional responsibility which reminds me of that in this case this week after an think in wrapping up yes yes runner and so the line is runners my clients have not violated any of the rules of professional conduct if if they had the matter and certainly me the deceit has the authority to look into florida allegations and that's exactly what they did here and so  without the root position of disciplinary actions that that states that my clients have not violated any rules and certainly they're not subject to the  what about that well out of the vessel be fine but there would still be vain our the question of the proper interpretation of the mortgage rescue florida and that has not yet been interpreted by a higher really a permanent injunction because the relief that you're seeking would have the effect of application to all attorneys in their own hands for it and that would be what the ruled that they would now live by and that is a term and by its very nature it permanent injunction what about what's your response to own argument on that one yes rather than the you know the circuit cour the pendency of the litigation and contrary to the plain test decision that you have to look at the request that the appealed by defendants is subject to review under rule three no seventy one the appellate court grants to the circuit court's order and whether the actions of the circuit court constituted the court's order
letters let's stop on that issue under our rules once the ninth circuit has jurisdiction does the district court have any authority in this circumstance whether it wanted to or not i'm sorry shouldn't apply and the normal rule is once you're on appeal the district court loses jurisdiction that let me ask you a different issue which doesn't go to the motion for reconsideration or the arizona savings that you did and that is whether if you take the two year period prior to the filing in january two thousand and two it seems to me that there is ongoing conduct alleged that would have occurred within that period i don't know whether it gets him anything or not but why alleges then is a new complaint that he is still experiencing extreme amount of pain due to years of not having proper fitting boots defendants have failed or utterly failed or refused to address this  seems to me now it says i've got the boots but the problem is now that i have to boot still i still have a problem and i have pain from my current problem and they're not addressing this problem that i'm just reading it on its face why wouldn't that be with the end to your statute and is doing that when you dismiss the case completely are supposed to at least see if something could be planned they didn't do that here but he appears to have something on the face of his complaint or you could parse out these allegations by date it is unclear to me maybe you can answer why his current complaint of its extreme pain is that that he was still on have you been that he had some pain however it does not appear anywhere in the complaint because it right after that on the next page of his complain of this time frame we have to be able to give somebody an opportunity to a man so the question is whether his continuing complaint about pain even though he has new blood falls within the two years that's correct your honor and i don't believe there's any indication
operating from a sacred mountain headquarters on the planet earth captain video rallies men of goodwill and lanes them against the forces of evil everywhere as the rockets from planet to planet let us follow the champion of justice t well renters i'm not so sure well knows what he's doing but here is an old friend of ours who really knows what he's doing the man with the star on his chest of the newest members in the post family of serials now rangers as the zero hour for bombarding turn ship full speed ahead for things on the fence so far as putting those manmade satellites are concerned but there's nothing nothing nothing much we can do about it rangers at least not till we hear from commissioner carey solon and time what do you say we go and beam in cast a video of western  living for a little longer and we can manage that explosion comes and we hope to ravage everything around for millions of space miles including us and we can't be sure of that range we don't know exactly what is going to happen but we do know that we got too clos intense heat will melt us to nothing but  right to an education american children are very fortunate in this respect because this condition is by the world wide in some countries there is no public school system other countries the school system is in effect so you can be proud and bernie it's considered a basic right in the united states having a complete and well set up educational system has a responsibility to their your schools and only as good as you make