MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
know we just use it to get around look just like a detective leaving town no she isn't you're going to keep that a go you're too late the admiral i mean miss madison and says america i am henry sorry and i intend to see that she does just as soon as my detectives deliver henry model tomorrow look i don't like this whole thing with the i don't want any part of a plot that might hurt that little kid selves count me out and i have no alternative but to put you to work work work that you say work i have a spot in my organization where i could wedge in a combat crew if necessary but the constitution states clearly that need to do the same all you have to do to remain unemployed is to keep this young lady with you for twenty four hours cycling to the g i bill of rights that you know have according to my watch you have seventeen minutes and thirty seconds to take this young lady off the bus are going to work all right this way cost me a fortune now she's rich and i i need money desperately urgent they don't expand my business hey you know what you want to do you want to remarry have the all money very clever money that was my plan she's my only liquid assets oh you mean have twenty five detectives working twenty four hours a day trying to track them down without a single clue how you've got to hold another day you know she's a menace she keeps on putting ideas about work in the minds of my men have kids a labor agitator no dice come on that's the only reason you've been nice to the k k didn't want to go back to work engaged to henry well it's just was we're all in this together way yes whatever it is good or bad we multiply by four don't wage well ok come on speak up i've got a job on that one where is it this time china burma india lot of things you don't understand and if you want to make speeches you better go go find somebody who is interested go find henry think  you know you see i leave this room in the next few months first one of the class to gradua inside him keeps blaming himself for the crash you know any guilt complex i don't know what you'd call it well jimmy knows i'll never be able to go back to coming up the driveway now time alright alright calm down i know i know you've been waiting for this moment for a long time
smoke so that won't move until i talk to him as your old chief says we have to negotiate we have to accept all their conditions don't forget robert i don't want any other victims were the ones me my sister's not very good at lying she never was that's like you i'm keeping bargain i just came by to bring you this you left it because i just can't go on without seeing you the fault isn't mine my god i just can't get you out of my head listen alan let's try to find a compromise we'll talk off the phone all the time but don't you go back where sure we that side of blood body that double homicide two years committed just that emma my opinion there's no doubt about it is obviously the same gang of nut cases we've been after all this time but there's one important difference a picture exists of one of their it's going to take blood and not just anyone you know there just are the people who don't ever have to work for it who have it all take care of the girl h you have me to protect this girl i did it doesn't matter how i did place give me the creeps you know and get outta here when you get these ideas from you invent them all by yourself what this guy i think you have a picture of a face you put he's got your newspaper don't know you don't have anything you may never come out of his hole you h we have something he wants the big he dying to bite now it's time all right ask you just get yourself killed myself for the rest of my life twenty five years younger but if you were twenty five years younger you would even have a robert was just a kid that was good one morning two drunks robbed and killed the old man you had for seven lousy dollars is not a bad guy his battle against crime goes back a long way i don't like the sound of your son  one sure sure i'm listening it's just that i never did talk about it when i was a kid i always heard actually well have a good trip i like to see you taking a few days vacation you have so many that you never took that you could retire right now you have been wanting to go back there for a long time maybe that
you know he your so this is our last song parting glass and we want to pick up kelly king for having us today all the vendors putting on a great market we hope you continue to prosper and have a great summer thanks again for having a front
convention it is clear that the drafters of the convention intended this to be restricted to grants that can stances so in trying to understand the level of evidence you're quiet here we need to start from the position that this was not intended to correct that is correct but it was unreasonable for the  about it an immigration judge they questioned him about that and says how what are the steps you had to take to wire three thousand dollars which in your country is a huge sum of money to your brother and  how can you forget about something that's a lot of percent of the income in your country you have you have to take this certain steps to do this is this is something that people do every day eighty only a bit you would after you're confronted with  and we and it seems as if there is a desire to have a standard playfield change differently so that it favors national security national security obviously does extremely important but if you want our position if you are
weather how many of you are going to be excited to see us of letterman this fall i don't like him please write him and tell him that because he won't return  thank you thank you very much ah i'd like to make a dedication to our fiftieth state of hawaii right now there's a lot going on over there you don't hear about it too much in the news but hawaii is to see trying to secede from the united states and there's a whole big movement with  sure we'd like to thank our sponsor monsanto who paid us to record his song lovely people we like to write songs about things that are important to us we found a way to to cut back on our expensive meals and this is a song that not you my brother my uncle it was never made clear i am your own call my uncle you was made in china what a surprise don't mess with the tips now youngster and you're acting like a three year old war which is usually fought for money or something it's a racket as we all know let's think about peaceful things and not warring things right out and bringing all peoples of the world together if you have or if you and i can get along the whole world should be able to exact live that live and love  the other very much for managers counting our tip jar
kind of in the same boat you know that any harm at all he's not suffering anymore whatsoever by the existence of this legislation the only thing he can do is frankly he's getting enough good work at this point and i know that's kind of a strange argument for me to be making and i recognize a record that would point to that i think this is the probably the size it's it's it's it's you know sort of like if you're going to exercise ordinary experiences
we have the opportunity as a court to ask questions of the attorneys in the pardons have one final opportunity to persuade us on the merits of their particular position after the arguments are concluded we will take are the parties ready t have billy aside for just a second to looking at the other rounds of the salable where there's this type of sentencing there if the state came in a case like this it's actually defending the sentence must be fifteen years longer i don't think the problem remedy would be just to raise  it's purely a question jurisdiction meaning that when is what some point has to be reconciled with the constitution because the constitution is where jurisdiction comes from for that reason even though we are acting as courts revisit it's our holdings what we're really asking  still matters then isn't the only part of our constitution article two section or if it's the trial court exercise and powers that probably belong to another part of the government here the legislature stockholm not attend parties all that matters is what he was convicted of and what the statute says what the parties and indeed the trial courts knowledge what everyone wanted doesn't matter all that matters is the condition and the statu required by statute so what's the reason for that secondly and that is this an opportunity for a defense counsel could understand that this could be avoided sevens and still negotiated that thereby giving the other the get out of jail free card later on some i think the way we work is that exception would allow the courts to respect legislatures authority to subtleties for harm without unnecessarily you know deviating from what the legislature wish i guess the same thing i think it's in the east and then it will do mean after things they can get away with that is the rule is you can raise this claim it's authorized but no the other party's going to have an opportunity to show and not even very much prejudice just here's a witness we factual basis in the indictment then if they truly could give the promise that if any bargain for want to talk again a little bit is this came up on the fence argument about what remedies are available if if this court toilet so this isn't a question of the state versus defendants this isn't a question of creating state friendly rules going forward this is just about doing the right reconciling this court's cases on  a clear rule going forward for all of illinois courts to apply the lower courts in this court and so although there will be cases that arise in the wake of this court changing is wrong voidness it's important that the court will that can easily be five other words well now we get these cases right on for so again for that reason because it's offending sentence was merely avoidable and not wait for the
so they have three positions were killed king had done all three and then what were they saying emissions yes so he's a senior development manager they make managers up into their positions create three management levels equal or king of health field one hundred yes all three senior development managers and then and then he's left with then they bring up a thirty two year old been then moran for another project and say ok
that there are still some facts that are really also with capital letters in the manual it says keep in mind that your primary objective is your safety and the safety of others don't ever put anything i have to say and the manual
possession is breached is mere possession of the database a crime
evidence for fifty feet because there are exhibit which are intended to be not only the original complaint but the amended complaint repeats them everything is up in clear we were intending to do this to go to the moore talk about the effect on the bees and on the flowers and more to the point the east coast status of wine but here's the thing this proposal was made in august of two thousand eight hundred seventy five y self didn't go off for over two months now a palace of complaint that the commission violated to one point seven zero by not holding additional hearings on the effect of this change not meet the states tory standards of needed engineering feasibility the least cost economics and the least they would have been the allegation to point out to the commission some evidence some kind of
i beg your pardon and my being completely ignored or does that deal from the wind to fascinate you in the language of the underworld you can dish it out but you can't take it can't take pride neglect i don't be ridiculous hard if i hadn't made up my mind to marry a girl who was accustomed to every luxury now are you proud to live well i've made up my mind and i'm frightfully broad headed lo i'm sorry i'd much rather have it for a friend  do just to prove that they're wrong i'm going to clear myself of this what are you doing th friends of mine to acquire but in that country
workers to protect them roughly a third of the country's but force is freelance workers and largely those individuals do not have contracts and there's an issue with them getting collecting payment or being paid altogether  estimates that sixty to seventy percent of those individuals don't get paid just the highlights of the bill that we're working with mr felt he coped for to get it complete  basically having a contract between a hiring party and a freelance worker with twelve hundred dollars or more must be in writing with the name and mailing address of both the hiring party and the prelims worker compensation must be paid to the premiums for care either on or before the date not later and thirty days after completion of services hiring parties are prohibited threatening or discriminating against freelance worker if action has been taken and basically that the highlights of the law itself just to get some protection to those workers in our economy and schenectady it's roughly eight hundred to two thousand workers in schenectady alone it's one of the growing pieces of our economy in two thousand and sixteen i believe it grew at three percent so it's one of the fastest growing pieces of our economy the top three or four pieces of our economy so protection of these individuals i think is important and it's going to be a growing part of our economy has been moving for the emphasis will be somewhat such a big piece of our local economy particularly schenectady so that's where the most impact will be and there's also talk by the creative economy association for lack of better associated with this so secretely answers unions who are very involved and very much backing this kind of legislation we could get through them as well as the creative economy or a group that's that's local and so it's relatively easy to get this word o because the reality is it's probably not going to be over overly burdensome given our discussion of these individuals are not covered under traditional labor laws and that's the importance of it you know looking up to the new york city  people why are we going this route we're not new york city that's for sure city council people take on a fifty thousand dollars a year there so we could start there maybe then they don't handle it themselves it moves on to another kind of law enforcement so that they don't feel like they have to handle it with kid gloves is that the purpose in right stations now you know being a think that that is something that specifically to this case that an outside empathy should have been called them so i guess my question is is that going to be not in the future no matter what a print back you get if somebody like the mayor has a good pull over by the police and  recommendations that again made for this particular case from disappointing forward i got i know you can't answer that because you're bringing that to the powers to be that's the question but i get asked the most you know if there's something like this happens again i will
fee it would have to everyone would have to be in agreement to there at the time absolutely or so in other words if you have something vision that's on a lake in the dam breaks and there's forty five houses and forty four all deficiency as a matter of law it means that a jury never
that page to find an instant use of the word days it's not proceeded by this case but sure enough i found it i'm the one that is responsible for openings and wor i could go through the legality of the situation but really i think a good starting point with starting point here is to just pick up at the end of them in our case where this court said the matter is not so clear that it should have been ruled upon initially by the court without consideration by the arbitrator and that's really no matter what what terms you use to describe a standard that's really what the standard  and it's been an issue of litigation for a long time it's really very straightforward very simple what is daisy should should the trial court if you got involved in that situation from our point of view it wasn't so clear that should and even donaldson were decided happily urges that this is a case where there is no question that the parties intended that the timeliness issue would be an issue that would be taken up before a time limitation whether the letters were sent by the housing authorities contracting officer and whether john coates austin it's remedies prior to invoking arbitration and then only then could the court so provided we just judicial no way of reading day that brings the notice of intent to arbitrate within in that case held that the notice requirements of the collective bargain agreement did not constitute conditions proceeding but you know it issue in one thousand you were some pretty hefty issues similar to what requirements representative of the lawyer to whom the grievance should have been submitted and significant in this is huge whether the union followed the agreed upon steps of the grievance outline the the outer reaches of the court's willingness to say we'll stay away from interpretive contracts to decide whether the benefit of the bargain clearly a decision the nature of conditions proceeding the court also retains jurisdiction or has a fiction to determine in the first instance substan
share do you believe that this case should be remanded for a trial on the issue of whether there was absolute immunity do you believe that it's a question of information verifying the facts the lead to the criminal prosecution but first of all it's important to look at his self and you'll find there is no such allegation in the complaint nowhere effectively sign beside it it's his responsibility and he was certainly aware he signed it he was doing that he was taking full responsibility for it that's the entire purpose of his signature on the information the fact that he was convinced or absolutely which i thought was unusual because if you have a police investigation going on the police come in is that we need more information the police get a subpoena or warned and then it's usually goes back to the police not department and had it been in this case just hypothetically had the return been to the police department what's the next step they would have taken perhaps contract contacting mr trac indicated that it's a matter qualified immunity it's not probable cause but whether there's a reasonable suspicion it's a little different do you agree or disagree with th believe that this can be decided as a matter of law based solely on the allegations of the complaint your amended third thirteen and the third to so you do believe that the issue can as a matter of fairly well if the well sure there's a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and here we go we actually been telling the police that that money was stolen from i believe that there is sufficient evidence for probabl knowing you used the word reasonable basis that's why i started out by asking there's two different standards here on the qualified immunity is the reasonable basis for probable
what course of the federal government is saying is no matter what leaders out there what sort of prior position that you have you see the governance of the we're going to trump that and unlike other property rights that have multiple sticks in the bond with you will b article well it has difficulty placing itself in a categorical category because what what the government is doing here
five first part of the bible one instruction that is the presumption that it would have helped her an arm's length that i'm not sure how the court got around that i'm unclear about two i want to or second major point is there is because at that point he's no longer destroy the file one is a statement it's evidence to restate it's not actually a punishment but it's a  tough down houses we're asking them before so we could see if there was anything else we didn't answer already  that you can have a spark without getting to the conductor we need that the problem with that one of the fundamental problems with defendants position is they not
decision to abandon any claim that there was an forcible technology agreement with mr before he decided instead to proceed only on one of the two patents the six or five we think that means that exhaustion issue has to be addressed in this matter of fact wouldn't one seed planted produce a plant that would give them this sixty eight hundred seeds why why why then wouldn't there be some logic to the to the bit excessive when you've already enjoying any repetitive future sales or other replanting of the sea well first of all that there will be compliance with the judge and i can see in other words if you have one bag of scenes you can ultimately have all of mississippi using your seat and so sure you can say that bag of seeds is worth  a lot of money but if you are for a closed from doing anything that goes beyond the scope of the technology agreement with the seeds then we're just weird how do you get to a very large number of lawyers not just well first of all let me point out this jury your having let me ask you a question with which i would you know the answer but i don't know help me out give me the chronology of events with respect to the infringing activity that's before the the reasonable royalty setting that we will simply setting the injunction aside for a moment and saying that we will calculate the reasonable royalty as if the party engaged in th hypothetical negotiation is going to comply with all the restrictions which that party has no intention to comply with numbers if i go down to comp usa to buy a version of microsoft windows for two hundred dollars presumably the royalties
there is a question about what was going on with this particular day there's no way they can avoid liability for his falling off the wall was there you know i mean the word was he was cautious he walked carefully al his depth perception was all for lack of better word aggravated i thought that was because of the snow that's correct yeah why doesn't that  i know your common experience is life about selling and buying gold but the idea it's got to be a particular one morning that this is going to be certainly strikes me is contrary to my experience  somehow it's got to be that morning or forget it just strikes me as inconsistent with common experiences of life well but you may think that that's what this record shows you he was forced to do it this like i was like i was
that one of the lots i thought was designated as a public access at one point one point it was indicated by that that particular lights on by my client but at one point it was dedicated for indicated  colwell who took all the evidence union context so there wasn't an issue even as to whether or not your head be in continuous use since the one thousand twenty's consistent with what the original idea  he said i had been told that the right service where you have all this room during wars and things like that i had been told that the public beach was lost in the entire body of water and therefore i treat it like that that's just not the ownership there is not real ownership that ownership of the body of water is insured ownership but the other thing is the fact is that since the one nine hundred seventy s there hasn't been any public use properties going around for it so there's one incident that i recall from the brief the record that mr dwyer asked someone to get out of the water or to stop using it in such a way the fair swore that the use was uncontested we also know all the options lost because they couldn't show the uncontested use for forty to fifty years in this case we know that the use of this has been contested whether by a commission or otherwise we also know from the one of the verses pierce case in which is prior to the opinion beecham the property owner can withdraw his permission with respect to the use of his property at any to be a long term and contestant have some say it has not been but i asked mr kirkland what were the what were the incidents where there was objection to the use indeed mention the no trespassing signs in two thousand