there are spaces there are areas into the roadway after we've been through there and then we push it back and they push it back and we push it back you know it's a it's a continuous battle until one of us when it's usually couple years ago we had a number not huge snowstorm and i've said over the years you don't need a twenty four twenty or thirty of snow storm to trigger the need for sure you get several small storms in a row any melting between and we get to a those it is a consideration too i understand that issues because i park on the street three hundred sixty five days a year where we have snow you don't have snow on the side get it on fortunately for me i live on a pretty wide street sure so with the resources that we have available to us the cost if you look at the budget what they're spending and the other agencies that have the show stars the cost of much higher than it is here for befor priority street areas i have other priorities true it's fine but it's one of the widest streets of bellevue along broadway to avoid the problem that people complain about is the narrow streets where they can't get through that's where the problems come in and based around creating a succession plan so that we don't find ourselves in a similar situation to what we found ourselves about a year or six months ago even when we had a key person leaving and no one fourteen the city would want to have exceeded it relates to expectations or gained operational efficiencies that together resulted in our expenditures being less than revenues by about two point seven so that we have to use o larger cash base and that we can do more pay as you go for our various capital growth so having said that where we are right now is two thousand and thirteen budget really presented us with a revenue expectation that was security typically together day and he didn't mention that when i asked him about where we were taking money from to support these increases how we felt now that we could have savings there when during the budget have respect for these individuals and they could very well mean managed to those will be levels it's certainly possible but i'd like to advance that there's no guarantee you know if you make changes between salary lines you know for sure that change is going to be there in that if you look at the steps you're committing the city to four percent increases for sure over time ten steps for for the managers and seven steps for the services that's certainly you and if you are considering this which certainly is your problem consider i would at least ask you to to potentially look at this later in the year and not at this point and it really really really feel very strongly about this  responsibilities in the reporting structure separately from the papers associated with each of those new jobs position so if we want to change the structure to reorganize from the structure governmental procedure process perspective i would feel that it's the mayor's organization to designate who he wants reporting to who will come of overall structure he would like to see within his organization and for the council then just say we will fund that or we will fund that you know we all have our own opinions and we're all  consider because if we're talking about people who are going to be taking on the responsibilities of that they're going to move on we as a city should be having people of today on whatever a skill set it is that they  this is a quagmire without a question but are we going to discuss all kate how do we all hate his reorganization was a part of that the that's a part i don't understand we hear old hate that he can be organized but i don't think there's this is position of possibly funding these positions but i don't know how we can compete when we have two different entities in the city we have unions here and we're huge is fair that these unions are treated differently because they are binding arbitration  so that being the case was wonderful they are getting ready to retire i don't think they're going to leave until they are ready to retire just because you can take advantage of them doesn't mean you should and who are you want to take advantage of an x after their leave who that is there a understands the operations understands the commitment the responsibility the amount of work that has to be done in order to achieve success those areas and we don't get a lot of complaints about the work that we have to perform that is a continuous operation we work seven days a week three four hours a day three or sixty five days a year and a lot of the ferrous who is going to put themselves in that position to be taken advantage of because we can't we've already had a lot of difficulties filling positions and now need management positions for the separated when they needed to be posted and we need to get occasions from individuals i don't think that's a good idea for the taxpayers of the city and i don't think it's a good idea for my family or herself so somebody should start thinking about who is going to be responsible to perform its w and how they should be compensated for and i spent over an hour with each and every one of you would describe to you some of the responsibility that some of these individuals have they're going to the forty percent increase is not in the usual he is a union know that you know and we just hate to see us get caught in the quagmire of our own discussion and then end up in a position you know having to hire somebody that it's more expensive then that across the state are we working on a kind of a strategy to say hey if we were to get x amount of dollars this is what we can do so that our request is heard right  as such a lot of this information would create a new field in your working on this but you're creating the fields and the information was updated today and some of that one of our people was  i think second favorite i