specifically makes finding that you know that he can well express doubts that he doesn't understand things that and how do we get past that we want to look i think it was there we weren't there and they i had an mention the inconsistency is that judge fisher mentioned earlier regarding the rubble coming to his parents house you have to completely inconsistent this money's about that including which rubble in one testimony on pages of ministry of record t nineteen to two twenty one he testified that he's clearly in the parlor room of his house with a spotter his father shot by revolutionary united front rebels that he jumps out the window and flees after the shooting but on page three fifty three three fifty six and also three sixty six he testifies that he fled out the window as soon as he saw the rebels coming that he didn't actually see the rebels talking to his father and on page three fifty eight he says he's not even sure that his father was shot by revolutionary united front rebels  completely undercut the credibility on the claim of his parents political opinion nationality as far as his credibility on whether he was persecuted on account of his former homosexuality there were two other major inconsistency that went to the heart of this claim that the immigration judge noted first he stated that he had been believing the i g noted that his testimony at the hearing he stated he was bleeding from his forehead and had a scar from the incident that's on the record page one fifty nine and one sixty two but the petitioner never mention a speeding or his current application for asylum or during his credible fear interview second position initially testified during as he hearing that he was almost beat to death with wooden sticks and some page seventy three and one fifty nine of the record but that he did not have to seek any treatment for his yeah i j later he was asking him to clarify number of point asked him how it's possible that he didn't need medical treatment after almost of these on the record your honor for instance the petitioner peter lee testified was afraid of being robbed of his father's diamonds which is why he didn't get a hotel room when he arrived in the ivory coast or pay for a taxi to help escape sierra leon he also testified that he managed to secure passage to mexico by filling out his diamonds in front of a complete stranger on the works and the ivory coast and other instances one petitioner testified before the immigration judge that the man named johnson whom he a secure passage from consistently as he told me officials of the united states mexico border that he had lost his identification card and he also testified as identification card had in fact been stolen by a man wielding a screwdriver in a chinese restaurant in tijuana in some of the petitioners hold a rather incredible tale of stowing away on an unknown ship with an unknown destination passage secured by diamonds that he managed to smuggle from sierra leone all the way to mexico where he was robbed by man wielding a screwdriver and then attempted to cross into the united states by saying he merely lost his identification papers without any corroborating documents or any corroborating testimony the petitioner story taken cumulatively is simply too incredible and inconsistent to warrant reversing the immigration judge's decision and he noted that in his opinion multiple times