MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
period and the elements of fraudulent concealment would be the same whether it's thirteen to ohio thirteen to fifteen it's really a distinction without a difference away the plaintiff relied on other reports of sexual misconduct have been surfaced within the church hierarchy after he has that in which he was involved mr was news he makes the same allegations and fin all the injuries claimed by a player ultimately arose from the sexual abuse he suffered rather than from defendant's failure to properly apprised claim regarding the robertsons past and what they knew about  prevent a plane from discovering a plane and when you look at the record in this case there are no affirmative action representations by the guys that were calculated to  absolutely no contact within the limitations per rights in some extraordinary way or the player has mistakenly asserted his or her rights in the wrong or the last time you  this is good it's not harmful it's not and order to test the constitutionality we have to work this back was actively concealed from the defendant you have an attorney client relationship clearly he went to dr peterson dr peterson did his report and made his final but under playing the pool there is a presumption of injury and here is what but does that mean
the our family or the th
banks has the legitimate position and backs to be represented well the other person he has to make a decision which ones right which ones wrong and i think he does and then he represents whatever person  was because he says i need some time think about it until he said i can do this for you he's got an obligation there's really if somebody comes into my office space courier somebody comes basis of her getting reimbursed for her criminal charges would be the same as as it as you ride with the rest but it's not anymore that have given her by it but good any other public official other than the state's attorney in their capacity as that of a public official in the county given her that advice in other words you could have a county board chairman who is a lawyer you know who presumably could have given her the same advice but could not have given her that advice as county board so why wouldn't he the state as far as giving legal advice alice a public official i don't say that the facts of your question are yes prove the point persian rugs always leave a mistake in their work even though it's absolutely beautiful and yet that mistake they were mistaken there because of their belief that only god is perfect reviewing my free is why would he not have a conflict and i presumably your pike knew the conflict because he was in the one that was bringing the case to a trial somebody else was right and if she knew that you know why wouldn't she also
this idea that for the county jail factors but i'd like to specifically address the idea that he did not maintain a reasonable degree of interest in service possibility and once again he he was specifically on the to do based upon official restoration there there's quite a bit of jaycee and the target and she was eight weeks pregnant with b c and the father beat her raptor while she was holding the child drug her down the gravel driveway voted by the and he's not able to accomplish any of those goals all of that will play out no no the visitation the children was never part of when it was which was dealing with his mental health problems with years substance abuse problems with his anger problems with this domestic violence problems with his being able to parent their parenting classes those the six grams because the reasonable degree has really three grounds underneath that those are not limited by any time period so you can look at the whole of them are particularly indicative of this and that instead of making any effort to go back and and ameliorate he makes a good to go the opposite direction which is to continue to be a mother to it's his intent to continue to batter the mother and not to make it go hundred eighty degrees away from even beginning to comply with the service plan while he was out of jail and some classes but that was yet he wasn't he wasn't precluded from doing these things entirely because he was on probation from january fourteenth then he was arrested again pin point it was sort of a ballpark figures because it is really not a very good record about his periods of the christmas we do know that he was on probation between january fourteenth twenty ten and sometime in may and then we know that he was released again ed for procedural and subs to due process he just wasn't the same just simply did not allege grounds that he things should have been alleged so i find it a little strange trying to figure out didn't show any anything that would go with negating intent to abandon these two children and then we can look at the history of that he continues to violate border protection he continues to be to the mother there's also there's the total lack of any reasonable efforts to comply with the service plans that were in effect during this time period he makes no effort to contact the caseworkers although the record shows was repeatedly given their car and then told and urged to contact them the only time he doesn't contact them is when the mother is wanting to go to kentucky to persuade the court to lift the limited to the time when he might encourage her a bit i mean no i don't because he he had time with her he could have i mean i don't i mean you have to go that he could have made a phone call or he knew or he had access to this related to the way he treated the mother of their children i mean it wasn't because he had a burden or something of that nature wouldn't it make more sense if you would consider the nature of the conviction and the underlying
going to make love her like she always wanted me to going up resumes import i never thought you would make it oh but joe show is an angel find i to be mine from what i hear that
i suppose it's useless my asking you again to give up all this talk what do you mean this running around harrison back to london and back so so he'll understand from the first your position in the house you know you we that's right them well we've been associated together not for a good many yes there are times when we all lost a little sleep over one deal or another one much sleep or anything compared to building up a great it's dark for i've been trying for ages to get her to marry me and you know if you know what i don't know i could go out and fuck myself i'm crazy about her and she treats me like a sure how much she know expected to idle about it don't worry matters are being arranged to take care of that but you mean well i didn't mean to tell you until my return from washing  your going with me i booked a passage but you know the uni i love you he couldn't even understand it you to try to explain to them and besides really it's up to you to decide whether you're going or not darling remember no you can't be like twelve shop noon and when we get on the boat we'll have the first real happiness we've ever no would you tell me how many there will be for that why i don't know me round the world then bore you to live with your parents near at hand oh surely i've just found out how much i ever since you ask me that question why i can just see that little strip of the mediterranean in front of
the new places down there like  changed over how big is it going to be thirty two
you know best even funny to me i don't see anything funny about it that every one of these crimes committed exactly as outlined in the from here have given me something to think about i don't know how we did it but it seemed to us click through and your willing to lead us through this laboratory think over what you said to me markets if you want to go back on your word course there's nothing i can do about it if you don't clear out of here i'll make a speech before witnesses but you beg me to take back la the joke about when you show is this rather warm and if you make it necessary i can i don't know where he's going he was crazy couldn't that you think i'm going to have my wife working on a newspaper or anywhere else for that matter
regardless of whether with possession career and domestic battery forever and based upon the charge the illinois state police are saying you can't and that's why the based on the battery knows t
well you sit out there and relax we're going to european jewish music because the wedding music mostly and it's fun if you feel like dance and dance if you don't just sit and relax and enjoy whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa  our state representative dave rogers who has a couple of messages for her from the state you hello belmont i always wanted to do that i thought envision maybe more lights but it's great to be here i'm dave rogers i'm your state representative and we are here for a fantastic celebration because sometimes it's easy to take for granted in this wonderful community these kinds of events but they don't happen by magic they happen because people care people get involved and there's one person in particular who's brought this town phenomenal music and a great gathering place for so many years now and that's tommy and if i might tommy if you would  and bill big man this is also going to join us well thank you so i have with me to citation state senator will rounds were also wanted to be here he's at the state house now voting on the sales tax holiday so we'll give him a little dispensation i have a citation from the massachusetts house of representatives i'd like to read it and it says be here my known to all the massachusetts house of representatives offered sincere congratulations to tommy olsen in recognition of the twenty fifth season of the peace impart music festival with thanks for your hard work has become of the love summer institution they greatly enrich is the  annual belmont community summer man this is a band that's made up of current high school students recent high school graduates and also just adults in the community so it's really a pleasure to get up here and work with people who live in town  friends and family maybe from surrounding communities and make some really wonderful music together as a community we're going to start with wonderful spanish march
the sole cannot be reached within islam that is there is this very specific difference between the county and the real world other than the fact that they have different names but the county is a public entity the real root is not good but i money's being spent on the risk premiums there are now going into the marketplace there are sharing the risk of loss with for profit insurance companies here the companies making in decisions like any other entity to retain some of the risk and lay off the rest of the risk with commercial insurance that is the key the theory i'm firm i give you the two million is public money would be public money and the money spent on the secondary policy would also be public money why why would other entity any other organization that they will retain some of the risk which is what you're referring to for the first two million of the retain women and their share of the risk with the four  spent in this case would first have to come from the two million women yes before even jumped into this you know rather than the shared risk issue here so are we still talking about the same problems that we have  out and buy policies which may or may not apply like any other organization and a completely closed internalise pool self insurance is considered insurance if the insurer is partially insure the so bad applies to this situation the and and and pursue a c dollars soft insurance is the underlying insurance for a coming vehicle that was even if this court chooses to treat the issue which it can't it doesn't really help state farm at all and that's because for two basic reasons first as a factual matter the excess insurance policy simple and in this case the demand never exceeded seven hundred fifty thousand dollars it was ms you get skis original demand it's a demand that states are said to the county have by the way pay a seven hundred fifty thousand so we can settle this case allegations of scope of employment from the beginning of the underlying case through today and in fact when we look at the allegations contained in the pleadings alone which of course that's all we have at this point you can read those for profit private companies who are paid to take insurance risks now this public policy is dramatically illustrated in this case here you have a public officials like the states truly who were elected to absolutely agree reject that out of hand at that point the county and state farm then make their own separate business decisions and they enter separate and independent settle attachment point that makes their self insurance no different than the railroad self insurance in missouri pacific for example going to the second point state farm's policy is a true access policy
the questions or comments is the side of the city that there's yeah there's quite a bit of landscaping here there's provides shielding and it's the idea of where we sighted that is it's part of the open space we don't want people as a sarawakian to the neighborhood  any other questions but the ones there are set back a little bit maybe that will be  need to get everything to y
it is a good part british citizen why did you even make that statement if it didn't make that statement for the trial court to rely on it in some way and making it truly we reserve or first contractual discovery that is allowed in section six on question they did you know it and that's the reason they put the car out in there in case one of the other parties in this case in serbia were used to do that
control it wasn't just that he had not exercised control he had been instructed by the board by the business in this case have no involvement with the bulls i think you trial court without saying is say your first question to assumption of risk when you release cases there's really two basic things that start coming out one way is in those cases where there is no are cases and in the case it comes to my mind just the court case and i believe that's the case where the plane was flying train or she's on one of the horses that she's tired  just let it go don't worry about it that's what you're supposed to do i have instructed everybody and instructed him to leave the ball along with this play of showed up on the morning he was
or when you or oh and
settle fifty thousand square feet and there's no evidence of that anywhere in the record the board never ever worked or never  all the let's look at the context in which this radio was made the school superintendent sits down with the appraiser and he says we want to determine what we can sell here they go through a process of looking at there's an existing building on the property and the appraiser tested by this process he says to the superintendent well you need to have an adequate land building ratio in order to have an adequate ratio you need to their resolution in fixing the minimum sale price the only thing in the first resolution that has any reference to a legal dispute is that in the exhibit the exhibit done after that makes imbalances if it can paint a specific reference to square footage but surmise is that the board actually has some understanding of what this public notice today and the public notice also contains three just errors in the description selling the land that was in the block one that was a record yes and so the question is did the school district believe that back parcel consisted of fifty thousand square feet which it is indicated of course by the school superintendent testimony and which is indicated of course by the fact that they used a minimum selling price based on the parcel envisioned by the real estate appraiser consisting of fifty thousand square feet appropriate here that the only way that the court could have reformed and did reform the contract was to extend it out that was the only possible way to do that yet was was he spending that nest like a x x number of steel not withstanding a survey that has a defined meet and balance description that differs from the description offered in evidence of the best doctors was never meeting of the mind in themselves and the school and in that case for suspicion that
law this is a fine if you may see not clean status as a bona fide purchaser a second mortgage when they took it there was no other men on the property and if you look at the cases the council cites that as major distinguish the difference between all the cases that the the council pretty amazing sights in our situation because  but there is certainly nothing preventing you also from going up to eighty or for paying off that prior to two thousand dollars interest
i say this because the statute that we use this case says that the court only consider of modification to be those bast that arrives after the implementation of the joint says that they can submit a report of they want to or they testify also if they want to bill have to do either one that the law that whole reverse states that if the best interest of the trial that has to stay have to make a connection between the best interest of the child and and the and the in the best interest of the child for a parent to tell the child who is seven years old to tell the ga all things that he may not want to tell him again and the mother was never given the opportunity by the g a o to review what she had supposedly told the seven or eight year old why no all you have to do is ask a question jails on the stand did your mother say to you tell the g a o l that you want to stay with me and i believe that in the transcript there is this question just whether she ever before the war that that the g a o that is what the motor pool the trial because that was not it was the steam engine evidence from the g a o nothing before the support the final using the record and she didn't at any time appreciate she was using the wrong name that's correct so the case that you cited may have been the an oversight or because the group that's probably as good a g a o report of i've ever seen but here's my concern there's nothing in this record that gives the trial court's position about what has been a substantial change in circumstances used the phrase substantial change in circumstance is the correct standard that two we could rely upon if that was the way this case was supposed to go because otherwise sure we're i believe she has made an actor better to subvert their relationship and their every possible opportunity i believe in this case that the g a o report was biased and prejudiced if you look at the without telling anybody exactly what she's doing the party has no opportunity to cross examine the party has to guess as to what the rationale behind the g a o report therefore have to put on independent evidence or every factual basis that supports the g a o report yes your honor if the g a o discovers these things in her investigation and she's free to the home and talking to the children or the child with the trip but not any underlying facts that maybe there's a right or position your honor is that the courts only consider admissible evidence to determine only reverse it but now remember just reverse it based on the fact that there was no evidence presented in this case it was very convincing that the mind of haitian needed to be done to serve the best interests of the
the condition she had was probably employment related she disclosed when she read the article the commission found that they had off she was on notice that it was  employment related on their day the supreme court and durian turns around and says the question of manifestation date is a question of fact for the commission to decide and in this particular case this woman testified they had she told god or thirty as a result of constant diagnosis she believed that her condition was related to or employment there's no evidence to probably carpal tunnel syndrome it was never diagnosed prior to their pay was it tough you must move in you're suggesting that because she carries files around in a medical office she's on notice the number one she has carpal tunnel and number two it's important relat you want to argue that she knew about it that she had carpal tunnel always paired into twenty you know what good's your argument yes and you see it's kind of like off running with the homes in hiding with a fox at the her diagnosis probable carpal tunnel that's the very first september twenty or not no doctor who saw her prior to their date diagnosed her with carpal tunnel  was diagnosed with a problem carpal tunnel syndrome the commission i found that she even though she was diagnosed with probable carpal tunnel on september eighth two thousand and nine she was diagnosed with a definite carpal tunnel you as to what a motivation was for asking the question she was never asked that question your honor i know but you just but then seeing that he was making the argument that she was in fear of her chat he interpreted it as having the average that she had carpal tunnel i'm asking you what is your opinion of those statements in general
reason is true the assessed value on the property was one hundred three thousand five thirty so what was done prior to two thousand and nine was you look at the improvements the building on it and assessed valuation was given to that tribute to those improvements and you have the property record cards in the record as well showing what was attributed before it even after the super fans were at it believe that the biggest in the current record part of the record s what the track record did in this case which i believe is entirely proper is he had the opportunity to view the credibility of building these witnesses to take into account their their on the boat bucket truck or spent a lot of time look like analyzing the facts in connection with the boat dock another boat docks and the like kind whether this smoke that was like kind you're not in a camel saying fish that we should be and piece of discretion standard of review on the boat dock because he made a factual finding and i recall him in your if you disagree with that you want to expand on that