out so in order to support this expense which will not exceed seventy nine billion dollars i am proposing that we take someone even from lines in the two thousand and thirteen budget that at this point in time we know we have available budget and move them into the appropriate response to that we can pay for this problem since we went out and did the requests for quotes in december two thousand and thirteen  brew capital budget there are certain pieces of equipment for streets and waste replacements but meant for those to carry and if the city were to wait until the sale of two thousand and fourteen time so in order to be sure that the city receives this equipment in a timely manner i even greater than her earlier than the end of this year early next year what we're proposing is to temporarily appropriate some of our unrestricted fund balance we have here two thousand and twelve a three point six million dollars balance so we're saying we're going to earmark that so that we can do a purchase order and have money attached to it send  entry quote unquote pay back the unrestricted on balance that we're using to support the purchase orders because you can see they can't go out and give a purchase order to a vendor without having some cash behind it so that's really what this is intende it's recognizing that has adopted the capital budget that it intends to issue the bond it to sufficient notice but it is allowing us to move forward with this purchasing put it on the books get the vendors to get going to fill the order one to reach you know reach them say restructure in a back up and running again arm and i thought maybe we could just run through each of these in the scene if we again decide we want to reconstitute some of them we can get moving on that environmental conservation commission kind of think we can remove it  so i'm going to ask them to come up and walk us through their proposed process which everybody's on board with it fall to the third thing his selection criteria that they're going to be judged based on the and the look for an estimated cost most of the time these projects are not going through this process there needs to be a set of standards and rules because some things are subjective you know we see how the whole track could be something you might find it more or less attractive than the next reviewer and so the scores can be quite  because it's very subjective but where we have something like price or some belief that was a very opposite direction doesn't get at all you'd expect discourse to be more aligned with one another and so i make sure that the reviewers understand skater a teacher or rubric together that kind of says these are the guidelines that you know good is between here and here averages between here and  mean maybe someone's two was someone's three or someone's or someone but it's not this wide spectrum so i don't i don't think the processes broken is something i just think if you do a little bit more refinement so to make sure that everyone knows what we're doing because i experience it what is the foremost experience that that you're looking at there is a different those are different question right so therefore you going through you know people who fight it were valuing volunteers or you know to burden them with you know sixty hours worth of labor to go through something like that might be excessive so what i think we should was saying is that in and sold one for only get it drastically different score with another just i don't know how you would interpret that differently so explain specifically how you want the reader to score if all ten people are there for a block of a month and you get a better score than if people are overlapping and maybe not available for the whole day so so i think you need to be explanation of how to use those for many years and i think that would for the council you know this one i think we did well the sense that we're clearly having plenty of discussion on it before we would know but sometimes when we do have things that come up for us we hear it we get the pitch and then we vote out it was out of council and then we go back and do some more thinking overnight or a little bit we can make our minds to change and we sent it back to committee a chance a little of a bumpy road in terms of how hope flows through i think sometimes maybe we should make sure that higher than some of my colleagues do but again if we're consistent across the board we come up pretty much the same reaction you know that generally it's the same proposals that come up to the top so i think the key is that whoever is doing reviewing be numbers you know what i would do is if it was the lowest price it would have been ten in the approach of understanding of the project i would give them a zero right or a low score so pricing is about racing and understanding about the product ok it's a different category so