one counsel before we get started may i just remind you in particular my counsel for appellant that our clocks just start from the total time allotted that is ten minutes or twenty minutes and run straight down contention that the photograph of the petitioner at his father's funeral is inconsistent with his testimony that he received certain injuries during his arrest in one nine hundred ninety first the immigration that verse credibility i j they categorize the adverse credibility findings by saying these are really important these are sort of important these are not important list he was wearing the caster mask he removed it at the time of this fall is going to be cost of the event was going to be photographed and he didn't want to have the memory of his father's last moment to show him wearing this device that i believe the i j a indicated was the the main reason for the adverse credibility finding the inconsistency between his testimony  the letter because it's written in english which i believe it's a not a valid basis and so the part that medical documents written in english and i believe there are other records in the other documents in the r from in the in english the printed portion of the letter as opposed to the written portion in english is also in english finally the titian or testified that he received a letter shortly before the hearing which i would infer that indicates that he requested the letter to be used in the proceedings in the united states and therefore it's obvious why it would be written in english alaska faces high i believe was the main basis for the  j in the case of several other bases for the adverse credibility finding but we would submit there are very minor matters in consistency one i found to be the court my name is renee rock and i represent that responded attorney general john ashcroft there are two key issues in this case the first is whether the immigration judge and first credibility finding is the court by its natural evidence in the record and the second is whether mr saying that his burden of proof would you expect to well founded fear of future persecution but i ask just an informative informational question and if you know the answer that's fine if you don't that's fine but question is so was your cousin brother harm a get was he released by the police and the answer is no the poor guy had never held a rifle in his hand but he was killed in a fast encounter of white people could that possibly be an accurate translation of what was said i think and mr things testimony can be construed someone would say wait a minute the question you're not responding to the question or i don't understand your answer and you not i simply don't see that here's one at one o seven right after the time your cousin brother carmack it was arrested in killed by the police how many times do you think he helped set up for functions answer used to work on december twenty five when i daily got together in the memory of the son of the guru i used to do when i worked there how could that possibly be an accurate translation and there's no indication in here where the judge saying i don't understand your answer or are you sure you translated that correctly well i think the fact that the judge later decided that his testimony was incredible in that he w of manner but there's no indication in the sections i've read to you where the judge said wait a minute either the translation is wrong or you petitioner are not answering the questions sometimes did small work around the house clearly those two statements are of some and on some i will contradictory either he wasn't so much pain that he could not move his head at all or he was able to engage in light work of some sort correct in the i j a didn't do that doesn't our case law require the immigration judge to do that there there are numerous instances where the immigration judge states clearly that she thought much let's just take one she said his testimony was inconsistent because in the photograph taken at the funeral he didn't have this face mask on and later in his testimony he said he gave an explanation that he didn't want to appear and slightly and he took it off now that explanation may be valid it may be invalid but i couldn't find anywhere in the record where the i addressed the explanation she  parents at the funeral in the photograph without the mask is inconsistent with the description of the injuries there's not much nowhere does the judge address the explanation and doesn't that violate  many of which seems that i do not believe you i think you are disingenuous i think you're playing games well i think you're being dishonest and and totality all of these combined using his testimony about oh i guess not i was going to give you another shot but i guess you don't want to take it as all right ok thank you very thank you counsel the matter just argued will very well be submitted