morning and i will point on some of the issues that were raised by justice for him on when he made his decision and his order and opinion justice from on real lives very heavily on the information provided by that in the trial d court is required to consider the evidence in light that is most fair go to the nonmoving party but that was not granted in this case just just judge from mine also noted that the discussion i will show that that information was submitted but it was excluded when i started working for the office of mental health in two thousand and ten i started with over ten years investigative evaluations i was assigned to cover the most facilities and i was forced then assigned to assist my peers who were having problems with a case since i was also a guest investigator for more other state agencies that two thousand and fifteen based on her critique of that case i responded to her by saying that the format that i used was that which i was trained by her predecessor i then requested for her to have been meeting with the team t let us know how she would like the case investigation done that meeting was not held until about february two thousand and sixteen however as a result of my have responded to her she notified m this case the judge will judge them or noted that decision was made by the agency because of my poor performance my ongoing poor job performance and that i had not shown any temp race was a factor in how cases were being handled particularly i was working in the case with a latino who's who for whom i was told that the case should not be investigated however go i has what they call the ten step process or investigation simply said to me elaine did not like the fact that i was communicating directly with her and go forward i must go through merrill so in fact i accept that time what was the reason why did this it was made and i was not given an answer complaints that they were consistent and they were consistent across both prior and after play just protected activity but that they were made by at least four different officials across the real difference agencies and it office of mental health and it was in fact play just on willingness or lack of improvement of performance during that performance evaluation period that ultimately led to her terminations which is the only actionable adverse action for her retaliation claims and i think without belaboring all of the points that we made and set forth in the braves it just forced pointing out the lapses here were not minor they were not formatting error as in they were not do with her protected activity or that the reasons that the agency provided for her termination after they gave her ample performance and feedback and the ability to correct those deficienc and that was after i filed my complaint and in fact the human rights in command of circulation indicated that the agency started complain about my performance after i filed my discrimination complaint and the fat and the case that m a decision and has that was the reason why no actually could have been taken complainants gave me the incorrect information for the respondents i was not able to have taken any action on the case that this prove it otherwise because no instructed me not to er the deputy commissioner about how to handle complaints she responded by saying she and west alaska well come up with a plan that was in january and that plan was the th warmest p r p i wish i was placed in february it was i was going excellent until i complained away can i interrupt i think judge romano focused on june two thousand and fifteen verbal counseling from noon yes right returns and then in october two thousand fifteen representation by it was a lousy about your performance issues that began the process of getting you into a p r i see you disagree with that yes you my email or my email communication with my peers right to meit's nomination i was never told that any agency had complained about my work in fact i was sent to more agency any of my peers but if agencies were complained about my performance wh