ok we'll get right into it i'm sorry they're there in a payment plan to catch up to pay monthly and the way it should go is that if they don't pay they should get a shot off notice i don't think that that's  consistently applied and that's a problem that frankly we need to take care of we have a lot of issues that that we need to deal with and delinquencies it's one of them i i completely agree with you had a year to pay for under three thousand they had six months we were actually reaching pretty close to the six month limit on some of them so we will just need to move in from the board to full force to shallow policy or which more you know i'm your i q or your hit the nail on the head is that if we don't want to enforce our payment policies including those who are delinquent then it is going to encourage or or it is going to look unfavorably on those who do pay on time and who pay to pay for what they need to send it's an unfair advantage and so that is it's it's not only agenda tonight because we have we have to do a full agenda but it's definitely something that i know i've been in contact move until those users pay and like i said we never actually shut anybody off because usually we've come up with some kind of the extension agreement or we've just got to the point we're going for more than they paid which is a difference between cash flow capital is what it is that's what gets caught is into the into the expenses is built is build a country ship capital reserve and if the end of the year there is not enough to fully fund that then we don't put all of it away that's what happen like telling a tax and we could use the delinquent tax collector to do the same thing we haven't really explored that mostly because it has never been a topic of conversation in a meeting frankly in march of two thousand and eleven when the clear well included absolute it is something you haven't done at the well house that caused you the system to have to hold water for a week and a half because that repair cost forty five thousand dollars and it came out of if we were not doing anything to keep the stream working it would make sense today to go and dig it up and put in a new water line just because the age of that now cost in excess of one hundred thousand dollars because the town is doing the parking you could decide it's not to replace that line now that would be the wrong decision because it needs to be replaced but i just want to check there is no requirement in the vote of the town took that the line that works with communities on funding water projects so i i did authorize loans for water systems as well as some of my colleagues and  this project came up as a possible project to find using state monies every year were we the state are given federal money to loan out water systems using low interest loans or potentially negative interest or forgiveness principal forgiveness grant money if you will so i ran some numbers on like this project would cost versus some of the goals that the project has for getting user rates within a certain thousand dollars a year of loan payment on the water tank you cancel them out you have a net increase of fifteen thousand dollars in the budget which at that point we could choose to increase the rates are we could choose to lower capital or we could choose to take some money out of capital to lower the rates we could choose to build the town for a portion of it because it would cover fire protection and there are so many ways to do it but that the bottom line is is that the tank project will fit into our existing project and i'm confident doors whether the town accept the decision of the water and sewer users to take on obligations because of the financial obligations have to be taken on to the vehicle of the town the water and gallons you would be charged one e e r you drink and then the per gallon use up to sixty two thousand when you get sixty two thousand and one you get to hear yours you suddenly pay twice as many units for that extra gallon as well as a per gallon cost it's easier when i look at it soon because when the water taskforce matt when the water task force met we were working with the best available data at that at that point which was the previous twelve months and and frankly that's that's that's how the tap that's how your tax bill works is that if you are house was valued at two hundred thousand dollars during the previous two thousand and twelve is that's what your two thousand and fourteen tax bill is based on it was the same concept now under our hopefully we'll get to it rate structure conversation i've updated with the past twelve months so it's more it's better data but it's still it's still from the last twelve months we can't just base it on one month one quarter because that could be a dry august and now you're paying on a dry august suno you're paying on an average of what you use during the year use your your rate your you count is based on the past twelve months not you are not your variable charge your variable charge still based on what is what your meter is read at for it yes it is so soon but you know i mean again to use like i could use an example of of mr face  he had a very high quarter in january because he had a leaky toilet and his water usage was up thirty percent from what it is normally if i based his ear you count just on that month he would be paying he follow that there is some ability to go to the wall to have a correction made if there's a proven problem it sounds like there's multiple cases and when you want individual by individual maybe there's some form that can get filled out that there was a known leak and that's what caused those problems today it could be something that's fixed immediately rather then our year later or two years later just a recommendation because it sounds like when there's a leak a major leak that's caused a problem and they want to essentially return all of it leaving enough allocation for two additional single family homes with three bedrooms on their  that to hold and keep allocations even when they weren't using them but are people who release allocations as the fars are proposing to do are they guaranteed that they can get him back if they've got something more no much water everybody needs that's not necessarily what they're using so he knows what the plant is designed to hold and he knows what it's using and you know if it's could use so those are all those numbers are all different so what what what he can what the plant can have is up here what's been allocated is here but what's used is here just because we're not billing based on allocation doesn't mean you still have that benefit so we don't have that benefit so because you have reserved for the size of your restaurant x number of gallons per day per year whatever however you calculate it you still because they were paying for it right now they are taking on a quarterly basis for an allocation of water that they now say we're not going to use years going anyway you know the town certain the smaller percentage based on something else so we didn't work that in because they're they're paying a fixed charge now based on their year you potential fifty percent or something original we didn't have a specified site for the ritual that could have taken them in the supplemental p r that was approved back in january that since then investigations have been made into  some issues with that site that will take a little more study to make sure that that state is still the most economical way to go forward down for numerous reasons but as part of that we put together as a request of the of the task put together a and engineering agreement which would be in two phases one would be to get additional information on the  final design in that agreement which will be predicated on the whatever and happening from this but a month's worth of additional work is that plan there if we remove the tag you could sell the site for construction and we're going to we would still retain ownership at that point but why if we move across the street there's a site acquisition question we don't own it and in that could be cash and a combination of things in lieu of cash such as sewage work ups but in terms of the rate structure of the impact of that acquisition we don't know until we see what it would cost for construction the engineering and construction and the wild card is if you replace the sheer leach field or through for those who look down and this turned out to be easy to use that often number one most likely all the auction and number two probably the most economical for and frankly we're not we're not defeating the design of the tank today we're talking about the tank location and we need to front load that location with doing a little bit more preliminary work so we can ensure that that is the right place for it we're not talking about design that's already that's there's another map that's engineer i could talk for the next hour or so and we sense so if we were going to break the first piece to get us through that first piece how much money or whatever then i don't have a piece of paper to do that tonight but i could and that would be i'm not sure enough of the on the funding side increase we spend a lot of time figuring out how to get to that increase i think there's a lot of really good questions that have come forward in and they were trying to grapple with about how to implement the increase but it's not how much it's a how to get there and we talked about some last some talk possible rate adjusted as often as possible or to know what your rates going to be for some period tom you know so both of those are right so we need to we're trying to figure that out with your help you live in your house the town that your residence you have to file a homestead decoration to prove that you get the residential tax rate just do with the education taxes and there's an april fifteenth deadline to do that if you file it late the state has an active penalty three percent of your education education tax so a lot of towns are struggling with how to deal with this and i hear that some towns have waived the penalty and there's been some debate about that when even allowed to waive the penalty so this is sort of a late breaking issue and they're the reason for the penalty is because there's staff time and some office supply time carney have a lot of work to do to correct tax bills and issue refunds and make sure everything's straight she says that it's revenue for the town for that work which is exactly the reason why the legislature put the penalty here to compensate towns for that extra work and good care is sort of been finding some information out and might have some comments on  wall so the basic issue is if you could waive the penalty would you why would you want would you not and without all the turning over  h s one twenty two is separate that from their income tax and then after january first they could have gone on line and claim their homestead mediately to make sure that they are in happy residential rate rather than the nonresidential rate and every time we had a presentation to you all requested that they please problems that their declaration and that's because the listers office does a download of homestead declarations and we have to go through the list to double check to see how many properties were we have to able fifteen for us because we start as of april first verifying all of them the cars the losers cards and you all know that you are driving around to the building permits and things like that so when we put specific item is within fourteen days of receiving their tax bill where the penalty is on it and the state statute it's title thirty two new section fifty four can says that this kind of t is to be part of their tax bill press that was a question was brought up by the people who are asking for the behavior the idea of waiving the penalty is my understanding if we find that the slug what has the of for if they do have the legal authority under to waiters and you guys decide to waive it you're waving it for all if one person on the list that you decide you're not going to wear that if one person on the list would like to appeal or grieve this penalty they had to and it means full two or full time active military duty outside the outside the state serious illness or disability of the declarant serious is an illness disability or death of an immediate family member of the declarant so the specific things that we can wait for so i don't know that's why we question if it says that the select board shall issue a corrected tax bill that includes a penalty in the amount equal to three percent of the education tax we have any indication whether we're required to do an all or nothing kind of approach i believe it is an all or nothing i believe it is an all or nothing if if you all choose to and that's why i asked why he didn't come because she much money would be rich it would be considered a refund now since august fifteenth tax bills were paid but the penalty was spread out across the four payments so that would be a refund on a quarter of the payment and it would be  future but homestead declarations by other towns to extent they knew they were supposed to file we've got we've like i asked had meetings and were broadcasting that they were supposed to find out and i need to disclose i do have a family member who is me so i recommend whatever the clerk's office needs to do in order to three properties and a total of three thousand four hundred eighteen dollars and seventy cents if you vote to do with this year let's say some parents are aware that just this year because now everybody has to claim that every single year wheel going so that tax bills to go out in a timely manner and not all of our deadlines with the grand listing washing things like that it is a tool used to say if you want the benefit of a homestead declaration do it by residential roads so they calculated based on the projected numbers that we're going to send them and all said and we've changed those numbers because these folks have declared they're homestead and they've gone from nonresidential to residential rates and now there's less money going into the education tax fund than what the town of richmond told them they're going to send because people were late filers so if you've got some towns that are repeatedly late filers and they keep leaving the penalties for other people this it might get involved in state and they it went up on the towns to collect the funds for themselves so i didn't do the research of the history i can do that this is a decision that you do not need to make tonight if you want us to research it further or you can just decide if you don't ask your recent research f just want to make a decision you can do that as well but it does not have to be made tonight because tax bills were already collected aug fifteenth if anybody is late now they're not just going to penalty for their homesteads other issues being late they're getting a penalty for being late and paying the property taxes september first right and what's really odd is if people have done extensions on their taxes they're not doing to october fifteenth and that's something the statute the statute is working out at the legislature next session  discussion i think i don't i don't think that we can do that we don't know if we can do that so i would rather get some more information instead of coming by back and saying oh i'm sorry we told you we're going to have it now or not so let's figure out directly from the tax a part of the state that would be great because if you do have the power the way that anyone chooses to we need to know what that means for the recalculation education tax break right so that would be more of it would be and this has to be broken out in several different ways because the there's four or five different funding sources for this project the first part of it is the water line which borne and that's where we come up with the sixty five thousand or whatever that number was that i put down in the air and then we have the fifty four hundred dollars which is part of the twelve is a separate know this bill form it's required that they all add up to the final number but that's not cast in stone that each and every item you could pick and choose and say i want to take i don't therefore it's automatically coming out  right but that would be a really easy way to save quite a big chunk of money that they're going there's also an island in the middle of the parking lot that kind of separates the entrance road that steeple street around other in the parking right now that's shown as a raised planter with curving around it and plantings and you could do that planter with just the pavement sloping to it and the roadway you know so it's the type of thing that is and while it seems like a reagan era this is really doing sitting with them maybe we're doing it because we have the opportunity to grant i feel like whatever we do here would come to me and it managed to warm water someway and from some other place i think that we should i think we should explore that might have been you'd be unlikely that if you rebid this next spring you would get a lower price i mean the the low to get it within one percent of each other that's really fifteen hundred dollars and over almost two hundred thousand and i know engineers is pretty motivated to they want to do this job right away because they've got another job the next day and under when they were hyper and that happened you know  when i talked to mike he did have some other items and i think you could come up with the savings you need but i just think it's important you realize it's not going to look exactly like the vision if curves are really important to you place but in the environment curving is something that focuses all the water to go to some different area if you don't have herds of that island that's an area that can now absorb water eight percent depending on if you were nonresidential rate was higher or lower than your homestead so we had a three percent because our nonresidential tax rate is higher than our homestead rate so that's what changed in the statute so number in two thousand and eleven you had fourteen property owners that were late in two thousand and twelve you had eight and in two thousand and thirteen you had twenty three so far is a summary of what the excuse me was approved last year with most of the two thousand and thirteen items taken out you can see some of the two thousand and fourteen items that that remain some of them may may happen some may not but this is an overview for the select board to understand what we could prove in prior years no this can be modified any way things can be taken out they can be pushed back for years they can be brought forward a few years you can add to this i'm going to circulate this to the department and ask them to provide their suggestions but i want to select four to take a look at it first to determine if you want to give us any ground rules if you want  say we think something's coming up too quickly we want to revisit something in particular what if i asked department heads to come in and talk about these what do you want want them to address so my my big concern and i think i've talked about this before with capital budget per capital plan versus our budget is is well i don't expect us to do what's called full cost pricing meaning build in every year for the cost to replace that asset when it comes to i feel like we're not doing a good enough job of putting away money for the inevitable replacement of these assets for using our short term borrowing which some would argue that that is gas to where bonding and paying interest over the life of the asset i like from from the perspective of managing assets and this is i i would i would like to see us save a little bit more to reduce the borrowing costs in the long run but that's my personal perspective on dealing with asset management and i last year i put together a table to show like i'm i'm uncomfortable with always doing that as opposed to paying for it with partial cash or all cash especially for some of these smaller ticket items you want to pay for you want to pay for an asset in the shortest amount though you want to pay for a long lived asset in the shortest amount of time possible and you don't want to be ponding or taking out a debt for a lot of the short lived assets as well like a pickup truck we should be taking out debt for a pop pickup say we should be doing it but i think we need to demonstrate should be doing and you know we have capitol building too is that certain costs and we have interest that we can earn savings you know it at some projected rate we could actually this is something that can be cost to save as well and and that the body doesn't come from nowhere right right i mean taking out a five year note on a roof great use of short term financing because the last thirty years taking out a five year no on a truck is going to lose most of its value in three or four years that's probably not the best because you're still paying on it after the asset is fully depreciated  taking out a twenty year bond on a road to read to you that's a good use of my money because your down that road is going to last it might need some patching but it's going to last so you know putting things in the budget like i just glanced over here the water fountain six thousand dollars for the library like actually a line in the budget we pay for it with cash as opposed to and i think that's probably what they're proposing rant is to put it online and for fifteenth cash right and i don't know that that high sign here and what whether or not they're determining that this is going to be that work it's going to be an x rated so this is just telling you the plan yeah yeah and so when you look at the plan and you say like this the tractor with snowblowers forty thousand dollars and it's on an eight year cycle so are we planning to spend forty thousand and one year every eight years and if so great effect but if we're going to try to spread it out over ten years or five years for that that might sorry am i getting ahead of my snow though so i just want to jump in on your point here which is these things change from time to time and i'll tell you know we've been doing things i'll tell you how they change and a lot of times we decide if we can fit more in if we go to bora and with the big highway trucks there or an eight year cycle we typically take a five year no doubt because that i think it was ten years the load or a load of excavator both five years ago so there is a lot of debt there where it comes to police vehicles we've paid twenty six thousand dollars a year for a police vehicle for probably eight years and that's not enough down at the police vehicle because we need a light or radio video recorder the cost of the cars are now it's twenty six thousand dollars so we're going to have to think about that the reason we have thirty one thousand dollars in the budget now is because the only way to ripley's replace the fifty a bowl was to lease one and again that comes down to we didn't want to have a new truck in a four year old truck and they go go on we we try to do cash with those last year we we essentially went in to a deficit on our highway fund to buy the formants pickup agreed to additional reserves on top of that will be politically difficult to do not say that it's not the best thing to do because we could get off of a debt cycle although we continue with the funding pain whether it goes to the bank or  goes in our bank you know it's that's a matter for the word so it is tough to follow the plans sometimes and you're coming to a budget and you'll say you know we can't we can't afford forty thousand dollars can we afford t spreading the payment sounds specially for a good long term stuff but it's not an easy choice that that's that's everything else being equal which is absolutely not which i think is what what ass this point is but but if you believe that that the future is totally predictable and that and that you can manage all of your financial risks under that's there you would borrow instead of say account we are in the interest or penalty situation with t v bank where based on our monthly transactions we have to maintain a minimum balance and if we maintain that minimum balance we don't get charged penalty although we have to have a substantially higher balance order to earn interest so some of our other funds are very low transaction i don't know the answer to that tom and i did talk about that that we were doing and he said he was going to purchase it i don't know if he's made that purchase project the big sticking point was we could never agree whether to refurbish and we have the existing windows or replace them entirely the town center department committee hasn't got a couple of years we they make huge sheets of what's called neutral density charles it's simply a plastic film that you can on roll it knocks down by it's just gray neutral it doesn't change color it just makes it darker i have some lines in my camera when things are too yes ok and we have town center energy upgrades it's a thirty five thousand dollar annual improvement budget although i don't have any current energy operated and we've done a the riverbank stabilization project which kathleen mike why is it been pushing this is has to do with the volunteer screen where sections of the bank from from the bridge may be three hundred feet down started to erode in the suggested fix to this very large stone aimes to stabilize the riverbank from flooding and this is thirty five thousand dollars dollar cost to it we we do put money into a reserve fund for that i don't have the balance off the top of my head but that's something that's  on the police want to replace all the video cameras and the police recruiters there are starting to fail and there are several thousand dollars each so we have fifty thousand dollars in there and i believe the chief will be looking for cash i think he got he was able to get a used camera from the state police for that  probably two years to build an army right it's hard to it's hard to go i mean your your vehicles wear out so quickly it's hard to go well it's not impossible to go five years but you get all right that was actually passed into that when it wasn't the one that was scheduled to be eliminated but they shifted their vehicle schedules so they had to keep one an extra year which is the one the chief was driving one socially just got it so we said we've we've replaced the crash one with the normal cycle of the of the name cruiser and we took a five year old car made it go six years he put probably you know fifteen hundred dollars into with that here try to keep it running pretty beat kerry they have some roof repairs basement ceiling really it's for them it's almost all building improvements they do have some technology upgrades that they do it for your cycle to replace computers and that sort of thing but really it's mostly improvements and repairs to the building that file and this year  correct that's done yes so actually well you know they're they're not paying that this year two thousand and fourteen is it's a limited record so two thousand and fifteen they're going to want to they're not doing all these things which are the stairs  another that would be probably a three hundred fifty thousand dollars a year goal but for the last one they had some proposals to use reserve funding trade in value and some other forms to lower them out that was borrowed actually borrowed i think two hundred fifty thousand for that and then that short term no will be paid off in two thousand and fifteen so the the payments essentially wouldn't overlap you the breathing apparatus i'll check on the update of that brush truck has not to be replaced for quite a few years and we talk about the highway dump truck fleet cycle and the next we have a dump truck to be purchased in two thousand and fifteen bridge street bridge we've not been funding that fund there's no suggestion other than i've put in five thousand dollars here there's we already have a bridge in culver reserve but we have nothing specific to reach with bridge i have a needs more to maintain but i think putting some money into a reserve specifically for that one mostly because we didn't pay for it you know it's i think it's a good idea and you can see the paving and gravel plans and then the recreation were taken care of the roofs for the two buildings down there we don't really have any playground fun we don't have talk to you about these items later in the year and recombined the lots into one line which he then went for the development review board for two lots of vision which he's partially could what he's completed the sub vision these partially completed is development plans for that area and at the time there was some discussion as to the method that he went that he used to recombine the wants he wrote a letter to our zoning officer saying that it was his desire officer didn't have the ability to recognize that that seemed to me that a properly made decision of the development review board could be reversed essentially at the at the request of the property owner in our slip in our zoning officer couldn't take any action to to do that or if you wanted to vacate decision you had to go back for the d r p to have  break the administrative subdivision has its own set of rules and those are local rules it's not anything really grounded in state law but there's nothing in our regulations there are a lot line adjustments but there's nothing permitting you to on your own combined wants so i saw a march various legal opinion and at the time he agreed that designing officer didn't have the ability to overrule that solution of the d r v he and i went back and forth for quite some time about his second part of his opinion which was there there didn't seem sell any lots he maintained complete ownership there hadn't been any improvements made and i told mark that there just wasn't good enough he needed to really dig into this issue tell me that it's ok for gary presser to do that or anybody to do that we're not picking on gary so mark perry has now issued his opinion and you have an august fifth letter where he outlines that opinion which says that essentially want to just explained if you have a subdivision and you own it and you've not sold in the lot if not made any improvements to any one of the watts you've really done nothing other than statutorily you're required to file the pl a certain period of time if you no longer want that subdivision you can write the town and say i'm going to bake eight to something and record it in the land records in the town does not need to take any action to affirm that basically you've dismissed the subdivision you've got one line now if you sold a lot or you built a building in a building on the low that was land records it's done in this in this case and it's not unusual for this to happen in other places and that's that so at the time i had said there was no way that this could have happened i was wrong and we have a legal opinion stating that how could it and this is attorney client memo although i've talked with mark and he understands that this is addressed as a public issue   the contractor is g w teacher oh they are going to expand the park and ride into phases so they're especially going to have half of it shut down each time richford residents need to find alternative places to park to carpool the village is very crowded we'd love to have the business but having commuter parking all day long does detract from other customers i've been told that a car or ski area might be offering space to park for carpooling there might be some other areas were sort of struggling come up with good high capacity areas and people might park for carpooling purposes how much the catholic church we could reach out to the something like that you know they're going to move up so they're going to fill in where people have been parking on the grass they're not going to do really any much more than they're going to excavate part of embankment for the interstate to provide for a circle where the bus can turn around more effectively beyond that they're going to be widening ruutu and there's going to be a center turn lane in that area and there traffic lights be attached to poles with arms instead of being suspended from waters so i was going to use a pretty substantial project so than two hundred fifty spaces when they're down contract and an estimated fifteen thousand five hundred twenty nine dollars and six cents on labor which i'm going to call labor in equipment because we haven't finally done those numbers we have our hours in but as far as what is going to go on the day which claims to be determined wednesday morning when we get the information how to calculate that from the state they have different rates that they pay for different equipment but once i think what we have the bridges it's so the repair all the way through there is it wouldn't be considered part of that damage the damage that happened that the bridge would have been a result of that when you think yes they did discover this this came about recently with out of so comments i was told about last week's development of the board meeting where there were some issues with an application for property across the street which is in the floodplain and a lot of work was done post i agreeing to the building that went beyond repairing flood damage it was really a full renovation structure but i think the zoning office was a little hesitant to issue a notice a violation when that started because they were hopeful that they could talk to the owners in the coming to an application and we switched zoning officers twice and in the interim kathleen didn't have time to go after anybody so in this case in particular there was centrally eighteen months of work before they came in to do yard b and the d r v is left in a tough position to try to answer some of the questions that  should have been addressed by the zoning officer earlier and that's not the only case or a number of other cases the death mob case is another issue where she said to nurses violations for you know illegal partment she basically said she was at the do it anymore i've heard from the health officer somebody else is living there in the select board wanted us to manage it and staff level to say you been investigated dressed and there's a big backlog i want to try to solve that and i talked to david sunshine this morning about this issue and there are number of other issues and i'm going to push the zoning officer for moving faster on the investigation of complaints and issuing notes was a violation we've taken some heat in the past for for doing that you know notably with green sea systems where there were two violations one of or or or the insult of having to go to the d r p so i'm telling you to prepare yourselves because i think we need to get a handle on these things or else people will continue to engage in illegal development activity or unpermitted business who says we'll get complaints from businesses that do get permits and go through the process and people's actually go and do what they do and beg for forgiveness later and that leaves us completely out of control and essentially forced to rubber stamp what they do or else will appear that we're you know unfairly penalizing them for something that we didn't seem to essentially having it on permitted use such as a commercial business in a residential zone you can be fined you know so much per day for continued violation and you know again the idea with these fines as to not find people for a hundred days but to get them in front of the bell their view board to comply and so orally with floodplain regulations we've got penalties and therefore violate  for going ahead with work without getting a conditional use for you could get people people don't like that but that's the way a regulation three and as long as we have those regulations that call for certain levels of approval by the town we have to enforce them or else they'll be meaningless will be mocked and whatever means time to think that we spent a lot of time energy and money on consultants to develop regulations but when it comes to enforcement we're paying somebody or i have time job to one try to learn these ation i don't think twenty hours is enough people don't want to hear that we have to grow the zoning office but our regulations are pretty complicated and if we continue to get the level of complaints and we do about violators that something's got to be done in whatever we can do to help make it right we have a zoning doctor if you don't like it then go to the planning commission and ask for getting the planning commission to work to change it but you know right but i think if she was we have to look at like you said you know we're looking at someone who doesn't have the money we have to enforce cost the board when you get into trouble it is your perception that you're not alone that the dear be is making some decisions you know making decisions for some or you know by the book and others that are not candid that everything's going to be by the book so that's i think another know and you and i sat down with both kathleen just to find out because i wanted to know more about the process because it seems to me that it's not just the length of time it takes so many you know knowing that we have concerns about the decisions and how they're being made in waivers that are being made maybe having an explanation on how they're coming to those decisions because it does cause me concern that you've got us people who are not being treated equally if you're not alone in my thoughts someone's being