and some people said that it would be easier for me to invite the judges down to lake front and save my make it over to michigan state by swimming my burden would be easier than the one i have for me today but i don't agree basically what it comes down to thirdly when did petitioner have to stop working when the trigger condition actually come to the point where she could no longer continue to work in this case the arbitrator chose to decide to agree with petitioners statements the commission did not change anything about their peers decision and the circuit court stated and not in the order that if they had the preponderance of the evidence they have a lot of things they would like to do with this however manifest way to such a high standard that they don't feel that they had an  treatment because petitioners own testimony says that she'd attempted to seek treatment several times private at several years but she couldn't she had no insurance did a hard time finding a doctor right but then she says that her braces were prescribed by a doctor and she herself states that she'd been wearing braces at least person seeks treatment versus is informed of the fact that this condition is work related examples that say that yes there are all these things that she knew she had some problems and she was trying to self treat why does that change the manifestation well that's the  thing did she self treat she herself states that seven years ago she wanted group insurance because she knew she had carpal tunnel then we go back to the fact that she says a doctor prescribed her a brace that was also seven years ago then during trial she testifies that in fact sheet wanted to file a work what have you a number of other issues that the right yes we do move on to the next one petitioner then said that notice was provided appropriately because she provided her employer notice by saying that i went to the v a hospital they diagnosed with carpal tunnel and they company said the first time that she knew that there was a worker's compensation place was july three two thousand and nine when she received the application that was filed prior to that if an employer is aware that an issue or is there that the employee has some sort of medical issue white the case of white clearly states that you still have to actually say that it's work related now this is where petitioners testimony comes in again to confuse the issue because apparently she said that two years prior to a manifestation this accident on march seventeenth two thousand items as good did i like that i told my employer about it and then i get the requisite opinion that says part and parcel of my job to these over the past twelve years results of the carpal tunnel i'm done why would i what about the the bonuses the tipped with your position on the tips is an interesting situation the tips were calculated by the arbitrator as the highest amount possible my client advised that for the entire portion of the average weekly wage for every single week she half and petitioner produced wage stubs from two thousand and nine that would actually assist in further determining what would be the appropriate average weekly wage but those were not allowed in evidence by the  already at that point her condition was the point where she couldn't do any activities of daily living you can't even aggravated any more that point pursuing these that's an additional issue regarding puzzle relation