listings four point zero zero because obesity the extra weight someone carries around is going to most impact someone with a bad back or a bad leg some or the bad heart some bad lungs because the reality is individual who's five foot four and one hundred ten pounds with a severe impairment chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or in severe parent of a crack is going to be more impacted carrying around one hundred extra pounds and between the lines or not so between the lines i find the claimant subjective complaints to be only part i don't complain about pain complaints with the i don't think the decision is in the circuit allows to read between the lines i think the l gainful activity the commissioner says his ability to do forty hours a week five days a week what about her daily activities says that she does them forty hours of work five days a week or in equivalents if she washes the dishes for twenty minutes or ten minutes or even a half an hour and sits down and rest because she's partying just because she cooks or cleans for ten minutes or twenty minutes at a time doesn't equate to the fact that she can go perform work activity you have two competing rationales the fact that the elderly can yes properly limited her functioning mirrors there is no treatment now nor any diagnosis that was addressed to her limitations in any sense were caused by her obes in the caribbean decision that he didn't use the word this ingenuous but only said it's strange to him when i mean when when l j except some of the descriptions of a claimant especially the fact that she can do housework some housework says she is not credible how how can you say she credibly described what she can do but then did it credibly describe how limited what she can do it it doesn't make sense either you know she's credible or she's not i mean she did the judge believe her he did in the family that's my position and my argument now the l j obviously can choose to or not to but what i really want to focus on just the brick amount of time is that obesity wasn't properly consider if you read the the ruling correctly  think it's perfectly proper to do a credibility analysis that analyzes both her testimony and other evidence in the record to come up with an assessment of the reliability of the claim that's subjective complaints in this that hearing that her physicians had never referred her for physical therapy for chiropractic certainly not for surgery not even for home exercises the a l j can look through the medical evidence and see that her own treating physicians don't believe that she needs more complete than most in that there's three years of of being seen frequently monthly or sometimes weekly so that's her position certainly were aware of her condition and never days to make an individualized assessment of the claims of the city based on evidence in the records looking at this records looking at the medical evidence it's clear that none of claimants treating physicians felt that her obesity created any type of limitation for her  the a l j nonetheless made the finding the common sense finding that obesity would have some impact on someone who complains of lower back pain but i think that fails rightly so in looking at the whole record found that it  certainly was not disabling i think in particular the fact that she weighed up to two hundred twenty seven pounds while she was at full time working person certainly discredits her claim that now at two fifteen or to forty she's unable to work her her never said that she experienced disabling succeeded because of her obesity they never found that she had disabling fatigue from any impairment so i think the l j correctly discredited her complaints of disabling stevens unsubstantiated in the record and also found her testimony not credible with regard to her activities of daily living  share is not required to show that l j can point out an inconsistency between what a claimant says she was able to do and what she is in fact doing l g is not trying to point out that the claim is a claim that he found not not credible