allow for a much better prospect of rehabilitation essentially what i think the outcome of this transfer hearing was was the state was throwing up its hands with this it's designed specifically mean to try to rehabilitate and then uplift you know these miners to be coming functional members of society because they are going to be adults in society no later than when they reach twenty one years old so you know the whole point of the argument that this transfer was really cutting you know your honor in fact that vessel thing that i actually wrote down the quote from the here in the prosecuting attorney got to that factor in his rundown of it's been following the entree into the criminal courts there were two references want to age you just mentioned justice right between the transfer here and the motion to vacate which was later presented years if convicted as an adult and then the quote is more if the state would seek to enhance this that said supplemental record painting three and then at the later here in which  made a point of saying there is this why class x sentencing range of six to thirty years while people versus clarke covers this i think i understand clark was a double homicide case where the ramifications were much more extreme the minor was going to face if convicted a mandatory natural life without possibility of parole and on the other hand if left in the juvenile court system incarceration they could not pass his twenty first birthday the applicable to this case there was an extreme because he didn't know he didn't know either and i mean there was no mention of oh that the fact that this was a fifteen plus six minimum for this much is forty five years order and there was an argument about constructive amendment and apparently defense counsel of the transfer hearing in my case was buying into that theory too because she pointed out this could be more than six to enhance so it would appear that maybe even local counsel in peoria was operating under an impression that hey we have brought those shisha in power is here if we want we can make this sex but but then again at the sentencing hearing the same prosecutor is saying our hands are tied so to me this seems like a bit of a blindside like you know don't worry justice is going to be six to thirty six three john who would have been happy with six but look you know the of the penalty in the juvenile system or the adult system you know but it's judicial better that to the extent that there wasn't any specific factor that it could be discretion in particular by not addressing all the factors especially the mandatory sentencing consequence you certainly have the power thank you undergo i think overall six fifteen to just go ahead and say this is reversed and we've made a determination our son that this should have not been transferred and he should be kept in the juvenile system that w trying to not ask for more than i think we're the law really would support i think if you can the instructor direct the court to consider the factors that it obviously did not consider and make a new decision and then if it doesn't that's taken care of by remaining before the new transfer hearing because we've gone back earlier to a point that in the indictment existed at that point that the indictments i with a gun so we knew the facts of the case even if the charging instrument was in appropriately charged there was a clerical error who knows the judge knew exactly what the scenario was in this particular case he knew with his that it was juvenile file to refer to in this particular case so i don't think the judge was acting out of ignorance of any of the proceedings below and likewise i don't think the juvenile judge was ignor noted the judge said that the defendant had been given probation and the services of probation use that specific term and in the record the defendant of his providing the fuel does not provide that particular file in the domestic battery powered as time he would continue to work to get out of there and keep his word straight of these are really headed patterns of years of working toward that in the course he's a day for day credit and all the other goodies and that sort of rehabilitation  sentence all right the court court stated that there are no any awareness that his condition would result in a life sentence there's been no consideration of how does the defendant make these or society would benefit from personal peace of course if you really get that deficit that would be similar to the court but this is not that case factors were considered jewish considered for with all factors he went through the list of every single factor