the religious minorities in armenia still experience and the experience she had there in armenia as a result of authorities taken action against serve because of her belief and review the daughter's testimony where she ate the daughter also indicates that i j that she believed through her phone conversations with her mother whenever mother was in armenia and i think those occurred priced only once a month that her mom had related to the daughter persecution at the hands of the tories being badgered by the government none of which the petitioner like under oath she came the united states after your father died because she didn't have anyone to support her armenia and because she wanted to live better and live with you here is that true answer yes i want to cite or the judge just now ask you as far as what you had rather testified was that the only reason looking at one statement that the daughter is making obviously any parent who has a daughter or a son living in another country and if there are a widow in their home country with desire to move it be next to that child otherwise your honor there wouldn't be any reason why she would want to move the japan then and live there i would accept being let out what comes across from this record and indeed specifically  old and there's some it was explicit testimony from the daughter that she doesn't have memory that is the mother doesn't she forgets everything she's forgetting everything just a very dizziness and her blood pressure is very high and  six year old seventy six year old woman is presently suffering from among other things including severe hearing loss idiopathic mental regression what happened in the proceeding if anything to address the mental capacity of the petitioner if i recall correctly your honor at  dark meat your honor was attached to the motion to continue to continue the matter because the respondent wasn't feeling well enough i believe to appear in court for the next that's a physical disability what was it was that that's what makes me and that r j was quite concerned at the beginning we wanted to make sure least as the record reflects that you really did want to proceed and you went out and met with the family and came back and said you were going to submit just on the application that all of this testimony gets triggered by the petitioner being put on the stand and being examined first by the i j a and then by the government's counsel so i'm trying to understand you know some procedural competency hearing the testimony of the petitioner comes across on the transcript anyway is a very confused  woman i don't know what to make of it because i don't see anything on the record that's arguing to the judge that other than through perhaps the testimony of the daughter that there is a reason for her inability to corroborate what was in the application but if i recall after your honor i think at the very beginning of pursuing i think i j and i had a discussion over that matter and i met it since she came to this country from armenia and i'm not a medical doctor course but i don't believe there would have been a chance where her memory would improve i'm assuming that i mean it looks like it's going to i just trying to understand what the documents there are so i don't know what weight if one at all we should give in resolving credibility issues and support for the testimony what weight we should give to the answers of the  fifty year old who had perfect memory i wouldn't agree with you at all i mean i think her inability to corroborate or support we have many many cases where the testimony on the stand is totally inconsistent and often it's said well i don't know physician so give me a minute on her bottle if there's anything left to say taken seriously at that time but you can't help but think this whole process is way off the tracks i don't think she she i'm not sure she'd understand the sky is blue at the time she was testimony she clearly had no sense of what it you know it's clear i'm not faulting the i j a for the process the i j a i was quite concerned at the outset of the proceeding of lisa's reflected on the record and there was this recess given or this continuous short continuous given to go out in the hallway and figure out between counsel and the client and the family as to what they wanted to do another option of the exercise was apparently in recognition of the petitioner would not be fischer so she comes on the stand and then we have those totally garbled testimony wherein she does and the daughter does corroborate that there were instances  at least reported by the daughter of phone calls where her mother from armenia was saying that she had been hassled and beaten and the daughter saying you know the jehovah's witnesses have come to the house that she does have so if you look at the entirety of the record there is testimony that supports the application and what do we do with all that given the fact that it on the face of it it seems that this elderly woman is had been the i d f i would have wanted to clarify that because obviously in light of everything else that was being said she may have literally answered the question truthfully that was the reason she came as coun said why why else would the mother come to live with her in glendale and in a strange country if it wasn't to be with their families and i think you mean there for she didn't come for any other reason would have given up the i g the opportunity to make credibility determination or find that that the daughter was was not as inconsistent she seemed to be but i think the i j a was in a position based on this testimony  which which inevitably gets me to the question that that as a court we may not be able speak very well to but i can't help but wonder what in heaven's name are we doing here and she's got to be eighty two now indications that at least four years ago she she was only partially aware of what seemed to be going on that i'm not likely that's gotten any better i don't know i think it's the problem of homeland security that ultimately calls the shots but i'm not sure that that anybody's real comfortable with the image of tossing this woman back to armenia where there's nobody left anymore and so is there anything else that can be done about this had to have exactly the same question when i got the case a few months ago that can't be your favorite  it's a process by which the petitioner can quest through filling out a form known as i two forty six deferred action and it can be basically an executive decision not that execute a valid deportation unhappy at times we're all in an awkward situation these cases so please convey the appreciation of the court will whatever the decision is on the merits nonetheless of your initiative in that regard much appreciate it counsel do you have anything more