important decision in your life it turned out to be and it turned out to be the worst decision that you could ever make because what's what is the evidence that this trial without the american dollars who has a civil trial going on and you to outside the confession mike is nothing to corroborate it but the difficulty is there isn't the difficulty that we aren't the jury and we aren't the trial judge and we're just not in the lo i could be distinguishing but i think in this particular case and in a rational jury looking at that evidence could have said wait a minute mark he didn't do so anybody mario called him right right so if we the wording conspire of course ok bringing or attempting to bring to the united states for the purpose of a commercial advantage of those people knowing that said persons were aliens so you can make a distinction   organizer reader in terms of ask was as operation in florida right is there any evidence on the record that he looked to his leadership organization beast to be the alien smuggling i don't think so i in the record i have one mr reeves well there's two two problems here one is with magistrate judge lawrence away understand apparently when mr fast was came in he speaks spanish and he speaks english and you fill out a you fill out a form it's a one page form reach told judge carol that i asked him if you had any property in arizona so you don't know the practices and i do this all the time you sit down with your client you get called over you've got this one she florida anywhere from six to seven hundred thousand or more just to the hilt and i understand that may be going but that's another issue so i would say it's not obstructing justice breyer the second one is just testimony is different than the agents who said that he made this confession and i know the court has the power to make those decisions i think in this particular case the court did and one of the things that i see happening all the time in the trials that i do now and there is let's say it's a friend that goes to trial and the defendant wins now he just said and he testified he just said a lot of things different than the agent that i've just cross examined nothing happens to the age think i know where you're gap between that was consumer and and actually being part of his own organization in the sense that he used this organization on almost a quarterly basis to bring in again forty aliens to his place of business to work just  noted in the record with regard to the eighty aliens that were working during the course of that at the time you know there are restaurants that i buy food at a lot and i think i would be really amazing to hear that i was a leader organizer that restaurant it would just shock me i go in and i buy there this guy goes and mine is aliens from these people and i can understand that he might be a bad man but how did he become a leader of the smuggling organization any more than i would say become a leader of mcdonald's and  think i would offer the court is just the only thing that i would offer the court of bridging that gap between a user consumer and someone who uses this organization and almost becomes part of his own organization and supplying him on a regular basis with these aliens and again almost on a quarterly basis find his own admission of bringing these aliens in and i would submit that each of these aliens in a sense becomes a participant in the organization because they are involved in this that leak illegality  provision provides that the participant can both be indicted or unindicted coconspirator these people are in a sense working for that when they know they're there illegally they actually enjoying this overall organization be part of the defending the working here illegally in the united states wasn't revenues even from the government that this this coyote organization this particular organization is a smuggling operation it is you know it's not just it's just not a few little guys a close enough to say i'm going to sing your words almost becomes part of the organization is that enough that you have to be the organization those are those are your words right well i think it's part of the criminal activity and that was a secondary question  progeny i think the truck will have the opportunity to listen to the defendant testify during the course of trial and his testimony was in direct contradiction to what the government agency had provided or in the course of their testimony and the as opposed to what the defendant was offering and i would submit that that certainly would be material as you know you know it probably is material i mean if you put me on in the trial you see that price he looks pretty material to me the difficulty next case on the