social interaction between a group of people really good morning america go if the united states i would like to began with the franks issue and then turn to george barron's question about the drug quantity issue with respect to the franks issue if i could start by putting the issue in perspective  there were two reported on missions from the affidavit one was that there was an officer who through mercer trial had been inside the bar and had seen mickey hand something to the bartender in the bar before he went back outside to deal with with i'm sorry with mercer and the second one was that the informant in one of the two thousand and eleven transactions had  bottom line is that even if you put in the information that was learned as a result of the defendant's complaining there is absolutely overwhelming probable cause to search and i'm going to start with the recorded phone calls to wh the agent specifically said they were writing on his experience he interpreted that to be a cool reference to cocaine the school has very recently said that officers may rely on their experience in interpreting facts that might otherwise make no sense to the participated in a drug transaction with the fireman to the defendant's home on september twentieth he went inside the bed came out the defendant then went to rescue us which was a place where the officers knew drug transactions had taken place and that is a very clear reference to mercer avenue bill rested three days earlier with two lancers of cocaine and we know it's a nurse or because they discussed the fact that getting bond for chemical cr and nurses first name is craig but beyond that there's a september twenty seventh call in which jones and the defendant recorded defendant say he's about to go to the source to get done the whole thing that will be stored not f i will not give the answer that i would like to turn to the judge baronet's question we need to start of the courts of course familiar with the standard of review that applies to drug quantities and what is a common course of action there were amphetamine that was found in the defendant's space then tiny amounts of methamphetamine can boost the defendant stroke quantities significantly better to answer your question judge barry by itself that recording call by telling you that this is not a situation in which the sentencing judge rely only on a pre sentence report and the corroboration that was contained in that present report in this case there was the fact of a bench trial on the issue concern judged her way out but there are two competing factors here one is that it is in fact in the administration of justice and the interests of that it ministration to have defendants plead guilty when the evidence is overwhelming but in very strict compliance with all of the defendant's rights because the plea agreement provided for a plea to some charges that not others and there was as i say in effect a bench trial with respect to drug quantity the third point which i attributed on the basis of conduct that was over fifteen years old which is what the guidelines the cutoff point by the condo in that case was in two thousand and six there was one relevant conduct charge the fence in two thousand and eleven with the dead informant the defendant was convicted in two thousand and six and a third specifically found that there was a well established criminal venture in place in two thousand and thirteen but even if you go two thousand and six to two thousand