better put her time back on the board that report for astronaut and presented to the classification committee within days within days of mr bush having successfully resolved some of his more serious in my grievances including the lack of proper clothing underwear process violation in the investigation the evidence was sufficient and the prisoner acted appropriately and classifying this person as a gang member and it would be appropriate if that were a proper procedure to put him in administrative segregation now if the end result segregating nicknamed them here is a proper penalisable purpose does it matter that your client's first that he was properly validated on proper evidence and with all of his procedural protections if we assume that that is the ultimate finding of this court that his due process rights were not validated nevertheless because the motivation for initiating the gang can or can't do in the future regarding validation that's a bombshell in the for his benefit as it is for everybody else is that they make sure that they keep these gang members away from each other as fast as they can and they kill each other when they get close to each other but you know so you're other prisoners and the person says by golly you don't like jailhouse lawyers we're going to investigate you so the investigation by gonna be turned off the fact that he's a gang member and they stick him in administrative segregation now let's suppose that the investigation was retaliatory and it was undertaken the in violation of his first amendment rights to speak out ok does the fact that the and seen a logical increase those that advance if you start from the proposition that the entire purpose of the first meeting was to punish somebody not really deal with whether he was a gang member or nah i mean let's just thomson and i are the person people we get together and say we don't like that person or that s o b is piling all these complaints i got a great idea let's throw money up a gang validation persuading find somebody who says he's a gang member and then we'll put the s o b in solitary and let's see how many complaints he can file from there right and then we do that what possible legitimate peanut logical purpose is there and that there is no legit in it is that and that's exactly what he has pleaded here let me read this to you washington state  also to me this is washington being one of the person people the higher quote the higher ups want you validated to make an example out of you to discourage similar complaints and protests then washington stated the bosses don't care for organized complaining washington further stated to me your family planning a complaint to the warden wasn't think good idea either this is exactly the sort of thing that pisses off the higher ups washington and stated the warden called me this morning asking me about your validation washington and frowned and shook his head slowly back and forth as if i was compounding my errors i asked washington what evidence was being used against me he refused to say except to state it was already in your file when it was sent up to the office isn't if you believe this he's saying they even they told me we're going to abuse this validation process to punish you for exercising your rights defendant can see that plaintiff has ranged tribal is just now we're going to claim now it does same evidence and so he's he's made out a prime official case it seems to me that they're abusing the validation process to shut him up and lock you men in solitary and that's why maybe it should acceptable and the other one merely indicate that it's not all trumped that i mean if you believe this is you must you have to take this evidence at face value because the wording called said lock this guy up we want to shock if you carry that your point some little ticky tacky official initiate an investigation for an improper motive regardless of the evidence discovered the person would never be allowed to validate a prison gang member and that cannot be the case if there is evidence you should write the opinion that way one way or the other taking us to bear versus  if at any time you want to take a break