of anxiety disorder which was his condition bill doing this for which you see the line of duty disability resulted from three specific work related incidences and this these were training exercises that occurred within the u s we go which was when he was first brought on full time capacity during a training exercise he did not manifest the symptoms to the degree he did later on in his career but he did have one of the only to return to work because the inability to return to work was that he would have these symptoms that would manifest from the condition when he was put in the training exercises dr wayne stated his report that the plaintiff was that disabled from performing his duties as a firefighter as he found no evidence of a current psychiatric diagnosis or disability rather he applying it was far more plausible that this is related to plaintiff's morbid obesity causing these symptoms to manifest themselves and they couldn't be sure whether they did lose the training exercises whatever was going on the training exercise in confined space were being disorientated whatever it was that is certainly what was causing the using the treaty exercises actually caused his condition to become worse manifest weight there is no issue of law to be resolved in this particular matter our understanding there was inserted in this case a question of due process the addendum pinions in this manner are generated by reason of the protesting the fact that the event us were acts of duty they were acts of duty as to the training exercises we are protesting the fact of what the board phone is adam those events he only became symptomatic think that they are know that the course reviewed the medical evidence in this case but i'm very comfortable that that's where the stage even the applicants are only treating the clinical psychologist could not even determine whether he was fit to come back to work she could make that determination fact every one of them basically says he when he came he was back to baseline after he was removed from the about so there's no question that any kind of a similar type of event whether it was were not working would have created the same situation and we go back with a history back the disability so after things have started returning the baseline the if you understand it he returned to is a problem there was an increase in the severity of the symptoms i can only state that the rules do not demonstrate that according to the physicians i think this is a medical question and i can i can illustrate with the medical leave i don't believe that there that probably just don't have the physical or mental capacity to do those jobs does that necessarily equate to a disability that was the question i was asked and i believe that they address that question however the board determined that this gentleman is in fact disabled from performing the job as a firefighter but causation as required by the statute is a different deal one plays disability the other thing is did the events in question cause or exacerbate the situation very closely th chemicals could have been ingested or inhaled if there was no evidence no evidence to that extent i would also say that i believe from the medicals as far as the mental disability request  you know but i don't wish me dead in this particular case it was for the question of the line of duty in this particular case there was no evidence that was developed in this case that would indicate that it was anything other than the pre inability to do the work because of the condition it's not really a cause of the condition so the firefighters have to demonstrate that the world cos is an anxiety disorder that's not the same we have to demonstrate is it cos it's disability and the disabilit more stressful than real life fires or were they already there with this particular virus the stress levels were higher then they would be when it was