a bunch of reminders to all sorts of different avenues and we're closing down the survey on november thirtieth so that we can start to tabulate the results and analyze them we have a number of articles that are going in the paper the first article was last week i believe it was about the community engagements we have written another we've been working with the school committee on another article around overcrowding and that's going to go in the paper under tom's name which talks a little bit about the overcrowding aspects of the high school we also are moving forward with our video we have and dan has has done a great job of scheduling a bunch of faculty members and teachers to be interviewed on wednesday by lucas trey guess and hannah fisher so without any further comment thank you so much you good evening everyone  nice to be here i'd like to recognize tom grimm over bergen's who will helping us with the project and you met david and rick so tonight our agenda is to look at the building matrix site buildings and strategies for the buildings user diagrams for the site and building as well as the evaluation major it's going so everyone has seen  upgrades the infrastructure upgrades there is no education or capacity compliance we also are looking at revenue in addition that's major and minor renovations for the project as well as all the construction and all new construction we are not allowed to reuse any aspect of this existing building and this is this is it for me for you what we did tonight is simplify the matrix so you can take a breath and understand it with a little less complexity you can see in the first how long is renovation only and that's just the building itself and the modifications we would make to the building and we are going to park that option so you understand what it would cost to upgrade point one and say the end c two point three and two point four and really point one which is all new and you might ask where did the few other options go that we are not moving forward and we will talk about that because it has the greatest impact on the site so we figured if we can solve that problem relative to the field and access and educational organization that in fact we can solve the problem of the other building we are going consideration the integration and the the design of the field with the buildings so i think you'll see some site planning that looks a little different and we hope you'll see it's a lot more organized so with that we'll jump into this is just for the purposes of showing you renovation it is really for the purposes of scale and to understand how this building works within the context of the site so this is the reservation only and we're not making game in the renovation edition of the reputation edition option is option two point one and this option you saw before the major renovation minor addition terms of meetings courtyards and using this kind of bring the mass scale down but those are the one thing that it really does as an idea is really makes a significant street along the southern edge and the thought is that if you remember last time we talked about the cloud functions which all share program functions versus the actual neighborhoods which are the classrooms again most of these strategies so conceptually that all cloud functions are on the ground for a bit of the ones that's a great great comment because what we're doing now so we're trying to keep a lot of flexibility in where you enter or exit the building at this stage currently as we speak our traffic consultant is modeling different scenarios because we don't want to wait for that we know there's a lot of questions about different streets and how the site figuration isn't accessible in those streets so we didn't want to wait for the modeling so currently has we speak the modeling the different ideas we presented so we can therefore come to the pollution about what is the best and most reasonable solution for the traffic configuration so in most of these options you'll see you'll see k of the site along the rail so that that actually creates more flexibility on the site so you'll have a you know an option on the east and west as well as school to connect across the back there's also from  months if not years of feasibility analysis that needs to go into that so clearly aligned with whatever we're doing so we're collaborating this cutscene this out like oh this is where the paths going to be it's understanding whether this is the path and doesn't work for the community does it work with what we're doing as well so that that there's a year or two he said fill it in design subsequent to this sort of neutral recommendation that makes sense and that's kind of how we date would be twenty twenty two point one three there's so much that needs to take place between now and shovel in the ground feasibility study in funding state funding analysis working be the concept for all the options i hope you can see how nicely the field start working with the building the fields of it's really very organized they're creating a nice rhythm and pattern site with the train tracks which are noisy and active parking which is also not very pleasant to look at quite active and it sort of layering the site as we move t the site become more green and that opens up to the park so it's a system that we think is really nice because we don't want what we call them off with this project we want to come to the building and see green ultimately come up with these different concepts for or the project house it's a private project and just a little backstory we've been in the office spending a lot of time researching our understanding of history about why the architectural history understanding the pla the current field house is about thirty thousand square feet the pool is about seventy four hundred square feet plus the water and the locker room is another that's could be done with yeah so it's about thirty nine thousand square feet of existing of those three components however you will be allowed you'll get a field house that maybe will be somewhere between we need to go shoot with the embassy a between eighteen and twenty thousand square chairs and the competition for gigs that are in that space which is no replacement pool now so everybody understands that and everybody understands that when they're ready for the brand new construction we're not allowed to have more about the choice to put the parking on the north side if i understand the motivation but in some cases it looks like aspects of the parking could be almost a quarter mile or more from a certain entrances to the building is that considered acceptable or skeet we want to say that we we look at this this this could be a revelation in addition project it might not be as your would like the purity of this without the appendage good sightlines in terms of how always in classrooms and spaces are organized so you can have walk sight lines to make sure that folks are where they should be and having compact places where teachers can actually get together quicker and more often to yeah i'm concerned we started the meeting bill were you going through a very tight schedule to reach a decision point from which you're going to be no return as and too far away we sit here tonight and i see these opportunity to present an alternative site strategies deal strategies building strategy placement on the site and that's what the g d p is as we get into the p s are we develop that further that's the point of closer we should have more of it to break into the landscape and really tonight it's hard because we're doing a lot of presenting but we're trying to give you an update of where we are so we can get feedback on where we should so  i i think that what what we might take away from this is what is the extent of renovation addition where is the building located how are the fields laid out what is the impact parking what might the impact to circulation and how might the organization be impacted by these options that's the extent to which that's where we are and where we want feedback matrix and we've heard those two together so we didn't really lose two point two but we've found that two point one was was a better way to look for approach that that that piece of the project two point five was the option where we separated the field house from the major part of the building into a show dog away over to the east side of the site and for those reasons of separating the deal out of the tightne circulation pushing it all over to the side we didn't move that forward if anybody wants to resurrect that for members of the committee and share with direct us to do so the real point into consideration we looked at what the fourteen we looked at educational program we try to say the rule is it was relatively equal to the other thing we're trying to make some grand decision making of the project thirteen that that it's really challenging because you can really just lose and say hey i like the way that was and what they sort of held back and whether it was a perfect process sure but they tried to be as objective as possible in a way to did and let is that was the one two point five which was the one that separated the field house and three point two which was the one that built to the west side of