support over fifty grand wide special conditions including cover topics such as human trafficking the use of force bias and policing training requirements information reporting requirements functions as may be invested where you get the verb for the including part that's not limited by what comes after exercise you see what i'm saying i understand your question but i think the way we're reading including  agee pursuant to this chapter or by delegation and then including so where do you get the verb other than that exercise such other powers as may be vested pursuant to this chapter or by delegation exercising is the verb right that would mean that would make it so but i don't think that refers to including placing special conditions on the ground skipping what comes before you need it for when the phrase including you want it to be isn't isn't your reading that you're you're you're replying with to two of my two colleagues questions rendered less plausible by the fact that on your reading  the the authority that you argued for would be applied not only with respect to discretionary grants but with respect to one of the grounds and in the case of one node ranch the criteria the grass as a subset of grants secondly we're not contending absolutely not contending that we have authority to deviate from the formula for awarding but the amount of funds here and rd if i can point to that was the th circuit's decision and more than a decade ago j p practice and probably practiced by other underground making agencies as well a condition that applies to an individual grant t is referred to a specific condition not a special condition or an additional apply to all apply to all grounds is referred to as a specific condition or an additional requirement we take a look at the office of justice programs graham documents in this case the conditions that are applied not just the three challenge conditions in this case but th thirty five in the post training and conference attending requirements just within the conditions of the rd circuit i thought went through as the various conditions traced them to a particular statute authorizing the department of justice to impose their condition do you have any attendance those conditions that refer to body armor requirements that go beyond the statute i think it's very common for conditions to take to take a general concept from a statute and to then be expanded to put more precise requirements  function and that would completely disrupt the formula that the koreans well i don't think you can put a condition on that that changes the funding formula that prescribed by this by statute and there are there are certain things that congress prescribe and one codified that requirement and made it a federal statute so it wasn't just a special condition of the burn jag program not just a special condition the office of justice programs but it's a but it's a it was it was actually made a a feedback loop here and i think there will be strong pull back from congress because states and localities care about their  now if i can and happy to address other questions about section one o one or two a six but an otherwise i'll turn to a couple over a couple of points so apart from section one a one or two a six which we contend is an independent basis or for the especial compliance with not limited without more so simply referring to our of the world apply to the us not enough i think that the way the district court in truth of the statute would be saying a plague of the laws that apply to federal grant management or that apply to federal grant administration so