amendment they outlaw gay marriage that also out last civil union well i think you're going to get the benefits in order to get the benefits  you know it's for procreation now still you know what people do i could care less that's what i would be a lot of but i'd be used marriage between a man and a man and a woman in a while and i work somewhere and you get insurance i should get insurance too that kind of stuff right i mean that we have a right right exactly and a marriage procreate our well here's what it says jim let me read it only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in indiana a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized i think that's the second part that the businesses are worried about because they say they want to recruit a gay c e o or a gay technical design or to some sort of firm right and they they want to bring their somebody they married in california or some other dude with them and all right well fine bring them along we'll get you know he's you guys are you guys are unioned will give you i will give you his that person benefits too and be treated like germination or all right thanks a lot appreciate that he has some good points only a mere i'm reading this again only a marriage between one man and one woman should be valid or recognized legal status similar to that sell not be recognized sell not be valid or recognized so i guess what card saying in the times is something i think a lot of business of been saying for some time opponents passionately detailed for the committee a bevy of economic legal and personal reasons why indiana should not put the marriage amendment in the state's constitution so that's indiana university eli lil well you're talking about i think the one of the bigger parts would be does your partner if you're able to partake and any of the benefits that you get out of your woman or a woman or baby how to provide health insurance for the other one's partner you know that's a good question i don't know the answer to that but i would think so if they got if they got a civil union or just a i'm a religious organization and i got the government telling me i have to give jim and bill healthcare benefits and against my religious beliefs to do that well let's look at this which one is a bigger violator of rights telling to do they can't get married or telling a business that if to do just to get married you have to treat them like everybody else every other married couple welted violates somebody is religious well know now the government can tell you i don't know well you know i mean let me ask you let's put it in this way all right if we want to have the government tell us the least amount of things to do is it is it it i mean which one of those is telling us more what to do our right to do is want to get married or to do want to have a civil union they want to draw up a contract there be troth in their own minds to for life but they only have a civil union and if they're not like married in the church or anything and they have that and they want to do that we say you can't do it or is a government being more intrusive by saying you have a business these two folks are married you have to treat them in a civil in a legal manner the way that you would treat two people who are married to government just by natures and she was going to be intrusive you know what ok but i don't i don't know i think i think it's more i'll go ahead well  i don't really care personally if two guys want to get married or i don't recall i would not call it marriage they want to ever civil union ever civil union i don't hear our bonds with our own mike and quite honestly but seems like we're spending a whole lot of time worrying about you know killing frank and mary and susie like so many things can be accomplished you can go to a lawyer and have all of the stuff drawn up and it's you know it's good  but you know i understand that part of it too you could go to a lawyer i don't know if you can go to a lawyer and have somebody get your social security i don't think that's i don't know if that's i mean when you're dealing with the government  social security issues an entirely thing you can write up a contract isn't going to matter if you're not a civil union as far as i understand it but you know if you really think about it what is it saying to the rest of the world though about indiana oh what's going on it's going to open up a whole other can of worms i think i think we can we've got now is big enough i don't know whether we necessarily need to open up another one of the king of indiana for a day and say you know what you can have a civil union i don't know if you can pick and choose on that one because if you do have a civil union then if it's against my religious beliefs who the hell is going to tell me that i have to do something i that's well if somebody is going to help out a second so somebody that civil rights thing i can't say i don't know but i'm not paying for a bill can work here but in your names frank isn't getting any other benefits on him and that's fine that's what you're saying well yeah i mean what are they going to s company out of business because bill can't get health care well i think you know in a federal way i mean federal civil rights would say you are not treating that person the same as the next person i mean it's legal civil right union is legal in indiana care who you sleep with mike in business i really don't care but don't tell me that i have to like it or don't tell me that so progress or you know i'm a cave man because i don't believe you know two guys get married no it's i believe i know i understand i would never discriminate against anybody but by the same token maybe scaling back the right rick scars you know being a hater you know no i just disagree i just disagree you know that to me i just want to tell the mayor excellent job on snow removal driving down you might have a need today excellent roads are perfectly clear great job there politician i'm praying to god they don't ever go to that single guy run in the system because i was nominate bill paper in a minute maybe that's the stefano for him but i tell you what that guy made more sense for half an hour than any of the democrats you have on any given week