MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
the call wasn't a car speeding or and under armor without a license so they get a call about a crime there on the way there instead of going  wondering is this  call went to the area found the defendant essentially and the situation we have another explanation for why they stopped the car would be a different situation they testified he stopped his car as it was it ma to i'm sorry rather turning to another instance where the trial for allowed irrelevant and highly prejudicial evidence to be considered there was no question at trial as to whether christopher was an applicant in the car or how officers originally identified despite the officers highly original identified him being not at issue the traffic allowed the prosecutor to elicit from three separate officers highly prejudicial  identifications three men shots the stem cell attention here was to prejudice christopher it's showing through skill that telling the jury that he looks different now than he did on that night the defendant is not as he relevance for these photos here as a scribe the way they presented this evidence shows the only goal was to prejudice christopher and it's a decision case where identification is not at issue you know typically these mossad cases that's how the original identification occurred we don't have that here we know christopher's in the car no one's debating that i would bet i would you react made it less prejudicial crasher honor and as you're asking justice price or just the state purposely chose to use these mug shots right after it had a listed shots where he does this this is how it felt on march fourth saying you is doing here it was trying to this impermissible other crimes evidence this is not the only time that the prosecutor violated a pretrial motion needs to come in six eight times if we need to tell the jury the context in which the officer staff this vehicle running a red light when they're responding to a call why is the jury need to hear it from every officer from the state's attorney in the opening in the closing if it's now offered to suggest to the jury that risk is the car from which the shots were fired as tragedy as far as the o once the jury understands their contacts why does the state need to repeat it with every witness and in closing argument if it's not offered for the truth to suggest to the jury you this is the vehicle from thousand and ten it doesn't indicate anything other than to the jury this is a picture of the person sitting in front of you that has been at trial all day today president and anything other offense and officer espinosa testimony is ambiguous at best on that topic whether this was specifically this both these two mug shots from when we took it right after he got arrested and we have a very
he actually found that there was a separation between the what what we consider to be the answer and the rest of the friend he found that separates he was able to find that separation to the rest of the frame and then construction of the district court because there are factors is that so you're saying you can still prevail at least at this stage the proceedings because the fact that she is even if we were to agree with the district court's claim construction for that is does have some it's not a process limitation but it's characterized in its ability to be inserted into the other structure  well i would go back to what the court accepted in the workplace which is anything that is or fifty something else so that the definition is describing how the manner in which the insert is actually put into something but it's describing a structural member questions related to whether or not there is an insert once the problem in the stand what the answer is but there are also factual questions related existence of the gaps and there there's no question that there is independen spring effect and low deflection all of that but that seems to me that the question that was presented to the district court and the question addressed in the district court's opinion related to the proper construction of the claim and understand that the claims are supposed to be very terse sure statements of in this case the structure of the mechanism the way it works why it works that's what specifications  for otherwise we could dispense who claims entirely as is done in some countries so i kind what's what i've described in the specification is new so i guess it's  is a toss up isn't it you have to have enough in the claims to distinguish the prior art why do you have to say this is how it works in the claim you don't have to your are but there has to be something in the fair to say that the difference is then ultimately not in addition to whatever issues there are concerning the definition is inserted whether there is a measurable gap or a perceivable gap or some panel and he said that look even if one except the plane construction of the district court which he challenges there nevertheless are genuine issues in the tiriel so as to preclude the grant of summary judgment here and whether you use one particular formulation of the time or not it doesn't matter we have there is no evidence here from which the reasonable theory concludes that there is an insert in the new  is to what it as to what it means when if you can fit the senior gauge into the space between the insert and whatever you call the outer part of the bat as to the inserts and then you find that you can take some of the inserts that you bought from and you can make carbon that just take the insert and build some carbon up around  that but either way it's the same piece i'm only telling you one thing and it's it's the same seed and it seems to me that's that's what mr levinson's argument entails in part anyway the fact that the word insert does have a characteristic that it's something either inserted or intended to be inserted but it describes a piece of structure that
going back to the state court didn't the prosecutor file a statement setting forth that a mandatory minimum of five years would be s but the horse right now just following it chronologically could could not the mr jamieson have appeared at sentencing and said wait a minute i didn't know i had a five year mandatory minimum i'd like to was entered could the court have told jamison what the military minimum was going to be to sixteen months which is the bottom of the range that he was exposed to on the basis of this truly anyway and this is like a harmless error type of argument where what is the prejudice what is a manifest injustice if he was sentenced to the bottom of the guidelines that he was exposed to anyway why why should they know that this specifically facing mandatory minimum of a certain number of years why should they know that that just i think you're contradicting yourself i thought you said that it is important for a defendant pleading guilty to know the length of a mandatory minimum sentence that he or she faces isn't that actually one of the most important considerations in deciding whether to plead guilty or not sentence or since i've come here i can't remember ever seeing a case where defendant got the maximum sentence in a situation where does that have to apply the same there are cases under a forty one we have to violate as in those situations with his discretion i don't remember  probation we really have more control over the individual and help me into going this is i say all that again to suggest the maximum here in the guidelines don't really mean much if that mandatory minimum was in me that would drive anything in this context when the in the church said forty eight with mandatory that the judge had the wherewithal to be in response if the intelligence in that in that four to eight range you must serve somewhere between couldn't let me put this another way could the judge have said you when i impose sentence under our guidelines in statute which you will have to serve somewhere between three to five years minimum mandatory sentence below five years and minimum the the front end of the sentence has to be at least five years so when the judge says the sentence will be up to the court that's a little bit misleading because they spent this as a court they said the judge is a minimum what five years or more but even that was misleading because the defendant they were i've been thinking i gave up forty eight because i think i can get this or to give me a minimum of three years or three years or something and even less than two years and the judge is now selling the
rights against other parcels that they did home their release would release the recapture rights is to those persons because if you don't own the underlying money you conclusion the conclusion that the three capture rights are an interest in real estate but in order to meet the principles of statutory interpretation are as we all know first we look at the language of the statute itself only if that language is big deal with do we look elsewhere and then ascertain legislatures intent but you don't claim that that language is ambiguous to you i didn't classifies those rights as a charge against the problem so contrary where you believe there is evidence of a legislative intent that these are interest in real estate they are excuse me i just want to charge meaning my caetano bar of payment i mean if you don't use the highway you know you don't pay the toll so no charge i would think is used in is a choice whether one else there in my hand or not to me doesn't determine whether or not it's an interest or a charge of instead of real estate certainly one can develop it or not but if you develop it you have so those those owners must pay the charge now in this case that was f r s and f g a mr those two parcels they had to charge against those two parcels it was an interest that they own in those two parcels it would rain with those two parcels and as far as acknowledged repeatedly when they filed memoranda of their transactions regarding those rights the goes beyond that really if you look at it i mean it gives the authority to the municipality to charge its fees to the owners it's not just a collection statute i'm broke in i mean least looking at the plain language which again is where we have to start to discern the evening after this because this is where it all i mean this so what hampers later on is simply a matter of how over those rights are satisfied it doesn't determine whether or not those rights are only interested in real estate it's a question of how one saves finds wor it if i understand the question if it's not entirely relevant because here is the beginning improvements were paid for by a third party by related to this litigation  that settlement agreement that was signed on august twenty fifth the night three days later in october on august twenty eighth of night had eighteen twenty five eighteen twenty eight charges in the bank c e o science the six settlement agreement the council referred to between f r f f and goodly venture there was referenced there were witnesses first of all to a number of personal property rights as we pointed out in the brief there were closing foreclosure which refers to the we didn't burn into that agreement and both parties relied on the trial court upon their provision claiming that if they were to prevail they would be entitled you can release on with respect to a commercial security agreement in a financing statement is what was killed and in the security agreement itself you can only release what you have and those were personal property interests
i called her when we children played together my brother had all but by always the leader all the others did what he told them to do they must have had an instinct that is well let's ponder them there's father wanted it all to become a government official as he was but my brother could not make up his mind it wasn't the type to sit all the time and therefore as a government official it would not be allowed home dog came her sister grateful i can assure you that he was definitely a very normal man in lebanon and love to be in the presence of ben i'm guilty i know all about the relationship between him and abel braun on nine hundred thirty one right up to the end and i also know about many other love affairs that has been gossip about her name of being the parents of a child but it seems on this baby is probably the daughter of one of her girlfriend berlin the players the oil fields railroad yards and rocket launching pads never has war visited such in order right up to his death life is threatened by his call my friends she is or loaded a few days later the oven took place which i thought was going to happen as that moment
come back later on but you know tell me the less i know i just want to get my hands and i've got your pri i keep a file on all the guys that are wanted by the police you know kind of a personal rogues gallery so then i read about the lincoln trust robbery and being a trained observer with a photographic eye i spotted bending hiding behind a beard so then i staged a phony schiller sightsee and i  put that gun to my back i thought sure i was a corner never again see if you really mean bad i do you can stay on probation and report back to your station yes thanks a lot so why are you getting mixed up in all this no i don't know because your name's monaghan or something i guess please you should push reporters in the face for the live look at the hotel on the paper why did mr porter call you to wait big come out answer me to pick up a trump steve i ain't done nothing where you are keep on ticking on me you got me so mixed up i don't know what i'm doing i don't want to be don't if you don't tell me the truth  that right slogan i don't think so but we can check on it relax you're bound to be is the response the teacher wants to use really after he thinks he did the murder with a name like mine and then so then she must have had some good reason but i didn't do it you know we know that but you'll have to admit you've got a lot of explaining to of lost is hidden right away that's why i came to see mr poole he always liked him i thought maybe he could help me find him and straighten things out what happened when you were reporters wrote this report about me then but before i had a chance to talk to him there was a knock at the door so i pushed me into the bedroom and shut the connecting door did you see who came into the room no no but i listened as the door there were two men i think i could hear the voices but i couldn't hear what they said even when i began arguing all day i good day what did it of the boys that sound like anyone you know no they just went on arguing and then and then i heard a groan and something sound and not after that the door slammed lock could one of these fellows been your brother you know i'd know his voice you know something about him  registered at the royal but but he's under the name of elliot room for fifteen are you sure well he looks enough like you to be a brother and he's got a blue shield or a case with jam on it why should he go to the same hotel as mr porter and not use his own name and remember that steve's waiting for us come along now down and sit down we'll have  dean told me to deliver thing arnold and i don't want to backtrack know me and found out that i missed something when i get told everything it was doing except a clean check ok i'll take care of that miss i don't know steve i guess he knows more about hotels and i do there looks like we all thought of the same thing what you do did i thought that was a pretty good idea then you sure wish jefferson was never had rules right now go on saying another ten minutes you'll be through and i'll be on my way with a bond good old yet you're not fooling me for a minute for you when you was miss hotel now don't get the monkey
they've got those bags you're going to take us right through the lobby and then we're going to take you out into the country for a nice little sightseeing tour get  so why are you getting mixed up in all this more i don't know because your name's monaghan or something i guess please twelve m p looks like somebody left no hurry because i'm a hasty i got an idea i checked her and i know what she looks like maybe i can help you find it ok but if you double cross me this time there's a nice little grey suit in you shouldn't push reporters in the face for that live look at the hotel on the paper i'll get to a nice cup of tea i don't want to i want buddy buddy yeah sure this is a strange place to be looking for me this time of day not at the hotel oh but i can't do anything mrs o'brien if you don't stop stalking around but i will see that he stops it steve and if you don't some one of these days one of those cheap crooks of the children but when you hear from them you'll send them back to the hotel i'll be waiting for  you're bound to be is the response the she wants to use really after she thinks she did the murder with a name like mine and then so then she must have had some good reason but i didn't do it you know we know that but you'll have to admit you've got a lot of explaining to what happened when you were reporters wrote this report about me but before i had a chance to talk to him there was a knock at the door so i pushed me into the bedroom and shut the connecting door did you see who came into the room no and then i heard a groan and something sound and not after that the door slammed lock could one of these fellas been your brother you know i'd know his voice you know something about him  registered at the royal but but he's under the name of elliot room for fifteen years are you sure well he looks enough like you to be a brother and he's got a blue shield direct case with jim on it why should he go to the same hotel as mr porter and not use his own name assistant told me to tell everything i know and i don't want to backtrack know me and found out that i missed something when i get told everything it was doing except a claim to ok i'll take care of  method i don't know steve i guess he knows more of our hotels and i do but please don't say it or anything but there's a dead guy going back there that means you got forty minutes out of it that's so good you thought you were pretty smart when you sent jefferson and that down the up on the roof right the caption on the boys yeah yeah i did that i thought that was a pretty good idea didn't you sure wish jefferson was on that roof right now
can't be probation person gotta go prison or that there's a thousand dollar minimum on or something like that that's just got to be there's no authority to give it any other way and the state has not taken issue with any of the old that this was a
schedule i really appreciate it it's wonderful to have the opportunity to appear before you today and to discuss our recent work in latin america we have conducted extensive paling in latin america over the years government and the overall importance of the united states as a regional player the net result of this environment can last influence in the western hemisphere for the united states and the potential for other in the seven countries that we did this is a regional sample we found that those approximately just under a third six about twenty eight percent are conservative in previous years when the numbers were not much higher we had more conservatives but then of course to adequately reflect what is taking place in latin america there has been an overall anyway and the reason i asked the question i know some of my colleagues have expressed concerns thirty eight percent i defined in the center and that about me today about twenty seven or twenty eight percent conservative so i think we've got a broad representation here and i should note that if you  not isn't it fascinating we have immigrants entering our country legally then every other country of the world combined and a great number of those come from latin america really have asked the question have you been to the united states would you like to come to the united states never a relative living in the united states when we compare any one of the people in every country in that sa you know there's a different kind it's almost like a diplomatic isolationism really huge proportion of intimidation to go in place that rely on other people that we don't want to talk to the country a country b stupid if you accept the idea that you don't have to have troops there we don't have to be a protectionist you know traditionally american has been region trading and talking with people without being protectionist and saying we're going to shut you but i don't have to tell you the divisions in this country the divisions exist in every country but those decisions are not an item or even spat like we have here is widespread opposition to american in power and
on let's get out of here
proceeding we're going to review the definition in person but first i want to ask for the board is there any conflict of interest or else part maintenance of a fifty fifty know the poles are shown there on the plane there is there's only one hole that will come into play there so as long as long as we  that's the reason for you staying
she ation that can the board of manage use issue insurance to itself you're already i think that's a very good question and the answer is the answer isn't a condo association cannot word issue is that if we're using terms of art here in the insurance industry a and sure is the one who would issue a policy of insurance and then that kind of transitions to our our third question with  is to obtain adequate and appropriate amounts of insurance there's no mention of insurance producer within the entire act and then here we're here today to say that if there was if there was married and properly understood meaning with respect to the word deliver the general usage of that is to bring your hand over or leave for another person that's it that's a standard definition from the webster dictionary  insurance producer would correct judge any insurance producer could be one of the individuals who procure the policy of insurance however in this context the word deliver if we look at the rest of the act is merely anticipate that it would be applied to leave insurance industry and i think that's something that the florida court and its analysis appreciated is that there is already have really regulated insurance industry in florida as well as in illinois and the condo association to a cheap to obtain duties border duty for the board to obtain insurance and the duty for the insurance producers to deliver a policy so if it's required to get the insurance the board is is the entity that must actually obtain the insurance  essentially provides minimum standards that must be met if you're going to ensure vehicles similar to the time of ira required a minimum standards of what you're going to need to produce if you're going to issue a policy to come to me associations it doesn't include dollar amount and that's essentially all of this proposed statute that's exactly what the court in citizens of florida did it didn't simply look directly at those words when it looked at that in the context of the entire statute and in florida and it noted that an insurance producer under this section twelve of the condominium proper react when this there is no mention of the word insurance producer throughout the word deliver it is a word that i know we've talked a lot about today