to finding credibility if there's a if it obvious a conclusion is clearly apparent yes that is true and but he had had any of those fastens understood they have all the records all records are in front of he hadn't had any of those facts and since two thousand and seven and he had worked for years after the as every labor without a single day  it's when he went in that night and this argument doesn't deter my clients credibility it should all straight his credibility he said i'm having muscle spasms i need to go to the doctor i don't know what's wrong notice no this is not an issue it's never been an issue about an issue before the court today how does that hurt my client's credit when he waits until after a scam to tell his employer by the way it's two weeks so you can't even file an accident because you're not an employee the first and this is why opposite results clearly apparent the very first narrative note in this case is the record of page sixty nine which is the first time this gentleman saw orthopedic surgeon dr matthew cor and dr bernard was asked directly by me just as often whether he believed that on march twenty first two thousand and eleven while the petitioner was doing his work whether started to experience back pain and dark bernardi agreed with an opposite result is clearly apparent justice for another reason dr bernard was employed in orthopedic surgeon dr bernardi has never done a disk replacement in his life and that was the issue before the commission justice the issue before the commission was after accident is  specific to a pending l four five disc replacement at the hand of dr matthew cor and the evidence produced by the spotted in this case was produced by a neurosurgeon who's never done this procedure an opposite result that that conclusion is therefore readily apparent position in this case that the arbitrator the commission and the circuit court for all correct and there are terminations in this case and that he is mr curry's phrase the links that support the decision are more than strong enough to do kelly and the petitioner make a big deal about the importance of this nurses know whether or not keep the petitioner told the nurse that his injury was work related or not what he didn't say was i was looking the back of the in class i was doing anything related to my work he didn't say that that's not recorded in their petition or didn't testify he said he said i was looking a back up being liars but he acknowledges you never told him the more he was looking to be  him home because he's in pain but i don't point this anywhere on the record say you told the nurse you know i was left in this bag of being points the accident just happened he doesn't know what he was doing then he goes to d scheiner work ten days after the accident complains of one bottle lasting two weeks to ration or course they can put it on march twenty first everybody knows that's when the pain started but what it doesn't help aka sharon work is or what what was it based on the fact that nothing supports nothing in that the medical records or testimony supports the petitioners claim that he was lifting a bag of the implants and that's accident occurred and that's what his testimony was he said in response to a question by mr caraway well i don't think that it could have aggravated a preexisting condition because i don't think  says my clients credibility is brought into question because of the nurses know a ritual that happened when he went that day march twenty first two thousand eleven the petitioner told every one of his doctors testified in open court that he had have a prior problem that he had been diagnosed as having scoliosis and that he had what he told the nurse was he was having back spasms you're on so you're correct he didn't tell the nurse at the last activity he was doing before he reported this accident to his supervisor dr what difference does it make i