say at the moment of the hearing about her country condition what did that at the moment i think hearing is that the government had a very poor human rights record that police abuse were rather grand that the government had taken some steps to investigate had made some charge against that in general the police acted with impunity it also stated that the police in the military are overwhelmingly from the opinion tea party and also stated that while the government attempted to recruit more of the indian ethnicity groups into the military and police that those efforts had failed what it said that the that the board used to support the decision saying that they could try any report shows merely that the government is attempting to control but it's not yet able to do so and that was also backed up by respondents testimony that when he attended political rall recruit indians into our party when he refuses to answer me again attack him and this all occurred while he was in control of the government until their actions coupled with the department of state report we  now that the government while it may be attempting it may be willing to try to control it is not yet able to control and this time and again we say that the department of state report basically backs up our position because  devil devil's island was i believe so ye or unwilling to control civilian p and c supporters in any any doubt but that he was beaten as he described there is no doubt that he was beaten or out of the court or the board did not doubt that it was by to resolve this racial tension that's been going on in the country forty or fifty years that's that sounds a little bit like a department of education report about the southern united states in one nine hundred fifty six saying that school districts are taking that they're trying and met that it's sporadically successful you're out of the the evidence on the record here that supports the government's conclusions actually petitioners own testimony fisher says he didn't go to the the government is taking steps to recruit more in the beginning instead of into the police force it's not in there it's not in the record whether or not that recruitment effort is successful we have a country report at the time of the hearing shows that it was an ongoing process but if correct but also it's an arrest he was found to be credible and he was he was both in the record here based on his credible testimony on page one forty two the administrative record petitioner describes an event where he was driving in a taxi cab and came across the road block that was set up by fiancee supporters where he was again by them had some money stolen from them but what he says in this testimony is that the police were there when the police were fighting with the p s c reporters the police were trying to break down this road block and the police cracked actively engaged and in breaking up this this event that was going on so to say that the government is unwilling or unable to control i mean i think there it shows that they are taking steps to to like i said reduce the tension between the two opposing political parties well was that before or after two thousand and one like fiji isn't i'm not familiar with the fiji as a country where east indians were brought in for labor and since you're so go and gradually increased in population where they became a majority and any one a couple of elections but the military and the police or are controlled and dominated by  that the government is not sitting back and allowing these things to happen on the government it's taking progressive steps and taking steps forward to quell this racial tension and that's what we're looking at here grant any form of relief we should remain with the board to reach that to address that issue yesterday that would be appropriate in this case and i'm not asking you can see that it should happen but if we wor supporters that it would be appropriate with this would be for this court every man for the board first to reach a conclusion that the acts that were described here constitute past persecution and then continue the analysis whether or not there's been a r issue here to whether he went to the police or that's correct he did there's nothing in the record in fact professors own testimony indicates that he did not attempt to go to the police and again he did not say that it was because he felt his life was in i i do not  and they're not they're not doing the government service or oh yeah but you know if you've got a if you've got a police department or the military that's ninety or ninety five percent one but by the by the british and new zealanders who work on the  on the issue of past persecution we feel that respondents testimony credible testimony has in fact shown that he did suffer past persecution and he was attacked every time he went to a rally he started was more liberal than both her father and his programming social norms and did not go to the police because she felt that since they were a male and be more muslim on the more strict for rioting that they would not offer yes but we feel that this case is very analogous to what happened and i say because we have a similar situation where the police are overwhelmingly of the opposite party both parties are going after each other in very propaganda stick wars this is also supported in the department of state which says that both of the parties in gauge mature colin propaganda attacked the field racial tensions he he felt and i think it was a genuine and objectively true feeling that if he goes to the you know the police who are here in sydney to complain that their party is preventing him from exercising his political rights with the p p p that they their government is unable to control after the elections in two thousand and one and the country pro car in rioting primarily by the opinion seanie because they were disappointed in having taken back the government case riots according to  courtenay with the immigration cordingley honor the first time that he went to that court the court was in fact postponed because the judge did not being afraid of its own personal safety during the rioting it was when he went to the court the second time and now he does say that the police were fighting the rioters and that is true but again this shows that while they may be trying to control they are currently unable to do so and were unable to do so at the time when my client