MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
lengthy portions of the transcript as well as journalists intentions to documents plaintiff's fails to show how any of that evidence make support contrary finding by this court contrary to plaintiff's generalized assertions the trial were carefully weighing the testimony and the documentary evidence here and found that plaintiff had not been its burden of proof either because the testimony of the government's witnesses was more credible or contract was credible as compared to the testimony of mr oh it was awful his testimony was generalized about the shrinkage i'm sure trial court found that there was no credible evidence that the government did not to the plaintiff just your job to cover that's not exactly what the concert an officer found comforting officer found that there was an underground in quantity but that the plaintiffs had to bring in documentation to prove that there was
extraordinary for in a large city like london a lost child is a common occurrence but many are far seeing by their arms him self with a bag of chocolates in addition to his nightstick no one suspected that this was the beginning especially the more delicate ones i see well there's this fellow returned treasuries he's name who's been courting margaret here fly on if i ever saw one i could tell by the shape of his ears and the fact that he belonged to the top top field and colorful club there was nothing wrong with his ears they would beautiful most of nevertheless he gave her the impression that he was going to see me last night and ask for her hand in marriage instead the scoundrel sent me some fantastic note about being detained and never appeared at all i want you to find out what happened to him what did mr travers say in his note that he would be detained because he had run into a little girl who was lost and was taking her home and they have you made an inquiry as it is yes father of course i don't think it's a sin to go to a man's here not long after moving in with fellow combs i had come to the conclusion that his mind was as organized as his housekeeping was not he was without a doubt the most perfect reasoning observing the scene i had ever encountered and just watching him think the come here said no i tried to put myself into his brain now and deduce what had happened to the missing mr trevor did it occur oh thank you what what others well is come to my attention during the past two weeks seven men have disappeared totally evaporated from the face of london they had no reason to you must tell us if he was here last night he's missing we're trying to find him it's no use so you'll have to do without my help this is a gentleman's club what has that got to do with it he may not want to be found if you know what i mean  think of it she does have one about seven years old she recently came to live with her whereas mrs enid live i have a
i want you to assist me in a rather unusual experiment experiment we're driving experiment i want you to stand by while i drink this oh and you'll need your stethoscope later we were married she was very i reached for it and that's when i remember haven't given you very much to go on mr ho there was no time for points needs that would have to be abandoned a mistake now would mean disaster that is precisely my reason for reading this the actual page of the newspaper and i notice that only one player the same time i missed the prior suddenly departed from mrs jervis logic as i hope you like shakespeare  drama even more important in the performance on your stage in fact you can help us to save the man's life i can you can insurance policy ridiculous and it might have worked but for one thing phyllis fell in love with edward right i don't know what your talking about i don't know any funny story bright then perhaps mr pryor you are familiar with rarely as lines
to conference with agreement of the state and he could stay degrees and then there's never any mention on the record that the court ever said or ever recommended a sense of eight to twelve years i don't the attorneys for the fun or the state can reject the recommendation and then the family cannot run for substitution of judge so where does it say that this is the rule it's in the an appropriate sentence may be the defendant or the prosecutor's redo except to reject the judge's recommendation if there was a fool to conference and there's going to be an open sentencing hearing in washington wouldn't tourney not put that on the said eight to twelve we would have tried the case w the judge has indicated recommended that you're going to get a sentence of the twelve they asked for a couple of continuance to six weeks later the one week before the play the judge says this is a continued for two conference defender reasonably believe that he would be sentenced to twelve but there is also some conversation now at the sentencing hearing where there is a discussion about some additional information because the view these are very serious charges with fury serious consequence of my client as he asked me to give him more time to think about the rosen taishan so he's talking about court very serious consequences and this is mr hoffman and city needs more which is why things come in this situation where a defense counsel or or different with think that they would get anything less seems to lead them to credible either considering that how horrible after four to constance's are no different than their ammunition that's for any sort of fleet even when they come in on first appearance these are the penalties that are possible there is no change to the other rules to my knowledge that say ok if you've made a recommendation you also have to say it may be now these are that there are this is a minimum this is the next number i'm sort of looking at twelve to fifteen or eight to twelve pardon me but i want to set the scene here there's nothing that says that correct occur but if there is some issue that it is going to be significantly less than the death range doesn't it make sense that can obviously a person he's not comfortable languages spanish or some dialect and spanish from mexico we did you say judge jury and said are you going to give you between eight and twelve
recognized firm it was at that point that i received a client with the handling the commission i have come here to offer you deals with a method of extreme secrecy i have come to something to talk with myself with both your professional and your personal qualifications personal qualifications  i know you to be inefficient hydraulic engineer but also that you are a bachelor and often and th was quite late eleven thirty but he insisted that the less conspicuous i freely admit that the money kept me from exercising a more natural curiosity at such bizarre proceedings one point s night it was naive of me to assume that everyone but myself was asleep but i did no one knew better than myself what that's meant almost the last lucid recollection i have i remember carrying it outside of plunging ahead into the darkness and you have no memory of going through the woods was not the next thing i remember you want dr
the no steroid use
properties and we don't know the value of the hawaiian heart itself a one million dollars is a conservative number so there existed in the phone five years after the divorce even though terry was allocated fifty eight the court refused to consider the standard of living established in the marriage even though that is the that talked about the employment opportunities available to emergency room physician who's would like to leave the emergency room and taken out of it because of stress and so thousand and fourteen he had filed it on his motion at that point in time and he did not pay it going forward is a question from fifteen forward that a petition for rule which was also denied is not subject to the appeal because the court felt that there had  he was no longer a point he was making earth zero dollars at that point time and the bulk of his estate was in retirement assets and he had a pending the decision before the court but the contempt allegations or that petition for was not subs portion of the appeal so the issue is when judge garcia rules the rules retroactive to the end of december twenty four te explained to the court that he was suffering from stress that he had suffered from physician burnout he had brought to his own expert which is not outlined in any of the council's brief and it's on he had an expert come in and  did eight not practice cases and that it caused him great significant stress over the course of his practice the thing that was very significant in terms of what he did prior to the terminations which was a voluntary germination which is difficult to overcome because there had to be a finding of good faith and at that time he had testified very clearly and in detail as to for mistakes he had made magical mistakes which endangered individuals between july and november t sadowsky also indicated and testified that it would be of my lesion of his hippocratic oath if he continued to work in the mistakes that he had meet specifically those mistakes in two thousand and fourteen is all the other symptoms that he had been
mine agencies and the proposition that sovereign injury would be insufficient basis to bring suit i understand you can be arguing you have proprietary injuries on your own suppose that we instead are focusing understand and appreciate so perhaps you could go back under when the fault is it that says a completely unrelated injury that has nothing to do with the statute and issue where the injury from violation of the statute nation could not moleskin standing proprietary ginger but there has to be traceability that you cannot trace to two likely to be traced to the statute upon which you're writing for stamping you can't trace that at two to ninety two sauber interest injury in light of pick one zero which requires you to show that there's an intent requirement and your facts are worse than yes to answer your question we can intervene for two groups and what the judge did rule on constitutional grounds he tale that order oracle three of the constitution rejected the supreme court said he had several hundred years of history he can stand on also said that standing is not america pleading requirement you have to support it as you would support repurpose when there isn't a finding i sat here while you're talking because implied it's on page ten states that brooks brothers presented evidence to that but there's no finding that i can find the lower court so if you look at back and having a constitution is supplied with reference to the history all this country has operated third all my bills the council says you have to have an injury for article three that's government a penalty that imbues from violation of law in my mind doesn't fit the proprietary interest case all so you tell me your best cases and why quickly in two seconds during green under the false claims act remember
in least on the three entry directions one on the top of the page the one right right one in the direction where the walkway goes toward the building and then the other one so that if you came upon that you would always see a one way side it's very to the right it it really is the same situation that we have now is this you have  detention on his truck in size which you see in front of you there's attention on the long just about road which is on the bottom of the page that takes up very much steve from inch we were able to shrink that by half so reduce that impact additions that you can place within that  were thirty percent open space in this proposal that open space  so right now what it is doing is being at just about road and it is wrapping along the right side of the development and then going back along a stream that is on the rear in the rear we are going to be protecting that stream and limiting location of the development it's at the intersection of our to propose roads that's roughly the size of one of the lot so around nine thousand to ten thousand square feet we have not come up with programming for that open space yet we're still bat around ideas what that w in terms of storm water as i said on the screen you can see how we shrunk the size of that storm water management facility there's going to be a berm along just about road in front of that detention facility so that it will scre views to that is solely were also batting around ideas about how we can improve the aesthetic of that we have not come up with any formal ideas or anything more ready to present at this time but know that we are trying to come up ways that we could improve that is that i and that was one of the goals of that small park at the intersection was to try and play something central on that point directly across from the park you'll see a green strip there is well that's going to be another particularly liking it either so we need to look at that a little bit more detached detached units where if you go to the next from ok so i did i did mention that there are ways to subdivisions that tandem this misapplication so right now just about development controls the are some that have the setback and there are some that don't so we want to be able to place those a certain distance off the sidewalk so that we can get parking spaces in front of the units as well so my concern with those said back lines when we're
i'm curious as to what the story to be allows that obviously a section twelve medical examination is authorized is there anything in the it that you can point to that would also right you know whether it's a demand of the employees income tax records or anything in the commission is all or nothing even with this statute either says you get it or you don't get it and even if there was probable cause if this that you said you can't get it you still wouldn't be entitled to that score so yours is you have the right we can see that there is nothing more that an effort to harass or in some fashion ed to section eight f a specious ability by respondents to chase these petitioners until they get tired of hearing the response somebody is making money here so if we follow the benjamins as one hip hop artist to say we put it in a song we find the way we might get lucky we might have a commissioner that says yeah you know you know think but let's let's let's take the easy way out this commissioner didn't do that the i think on the record because the record here has already been established that this was a fishing expedition to get his tax returns there is even an agreement that he was probably totally disabled what is missing is the fact that the prior hearings before this alleged petition to modify benefits has already been in is a record judicial notice taken away vs electric it was decided two and a half years ago so for this omission i apologize and you can ok the supreme court in the king case said we're not going to restrict the respondents use of section twelve under eight out to be we're not going to strike that i'm not sure why this court ban would you're saying this is in your view no different than a survey on its first seeder yes what i'm saying more more than that is that you can you surveillance you can use section o'clock and that can start something you're not unlimited there's no limitations under eight out and it's clear from we can case that the supreme court under section twelve in regards that doesn't didn't impose any restrictions on
society has to be there
appeal to answer any questions on the second issue with his question mission i would like to focus on the first issue regarding the admission of the season statements identifying lester toppy as the shooter in this case you even a look at the most recent u s supreme court decision on this the she can be bright they just say in just one of the factors they look at because it could tend to show if it's not formal that means it might be a response to an ongoing urgency but that doesn't necessarily dictate either way whether states testimony if somebody says oh x with the so and so shocked me is that the psalms doesn't sound like that's mean no but we  crawford even at the top of this definition of testimony before this idea of whether statements testimony or not really made it into people's consciousness so we don't you know based on this  counsel was in any way deficient for failing to raise this issue where there is no question that at the time that the case came out at the time that the appellate counsel was the defendant is charging him with having to have supplement in his brief based on proper coming out after the brief was written the only case that was out there was proffered and the only mention in crawford which we all know proffer did not did not define testimonial only fact that was different in that case was that that i decided made his statement in response to police questioning not to a person and certainly here we have just at the same exact statement in the same circumstances pain and had difficulty talking in breathing that he would not have had the primary purpose to establish vocals past events potentially relevant to a criminal prosecution he had quote any purpose at all beyond reflexive responses to question i mean certainly that is our like t t but one that case is not over rule but even as they say in the concurring opinion they outline it doesn't support your position because it says a police officer right o our somebody that's not a police officer may under certain circumstances not cross the line to make a testimonial it depends on the purpose of why the person was there i believe that foley your honor up just purpose to assist the police addressing it i'm going to see so there is no evidence kerry that the statements from eight police officers so we don't really know what the primary purpose is how do we get there mr buckley based upon the the crawford if you know the reason we're struggling with all of us now is that crawford as many supreme court decisions do gives you the outline of something without really defining and the question is in the absence of the definition of testimony we know what clearly is rougher tells us what clearly is we don't know what isn't and we don't know what ma which would mean that the attorney was not finished because he looked at that said it doesn't help me it gives me a definition of testimonial contest i don't think any attorney can
she never specifies exactly when anything happened or why and there's just very little evidence how many things happen she says he touched me which i don't intend to reiterate to you now but i would just like to touch on it he noted that our united states supreme court has complained the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse of children and government object business the performance of this duty its just leave regarded as one of the most important of governmental functions and this prosecutor definitely approached this case counsel based on the
on a bomber from the united want to thank you for being here today
to have anything to do to killing you john preston with my nice of you to do this grass rock invention sally i did it for you many we're not worth it we're just no good you're not to blame for the rest of them you leave your everything it's fine to me were kind of looking for your family merely yeah to hang on for a killer and they never done well we got some pretty good evidence you tell me who gave you the evidence and i'll peter now aren't you a lot of things can happen in five years tell me what's happened i've written almost a week to get back to you well a few months ago a new outfit came in and took over the old john preston ranch and then they fenced up all the water holders and we couldn't get any water for our cattle the few that survived breeders told owner poison what's the matter with the writers well the boys have all been scared off and some of even been killed well that's well rebel looks like it's dark and i have to do a little investigating i figured you'd be coming over here for a little talk pretty soon your father was going to come over looking for you and then there'll be a score of  to live sally just a minute saying let me have your gun and so you didn't really send for me or girl no i didn't know where to find you but i wanted you to come there and you want me to stay yes always
you plead to the crime you know you're not going to get a trial so when all the rights are gone through your right to a jury trial you know you're not getting it from when you're changing your mind about whether you want to jury versus a judge it's a more complicated that's the process and one happened here is when a reduction for having responsibility because after all he did waive history could be an issue here particularly since we just argued that to you on the withdrawal we agree that could be an issue here given his language and his potential depression that was never mentioned there was the image right it has an obvious probably a of a inquiry of the defendant it would have come out and the defense lawyer as well as the judge might not be the other thing i wanted to i think that the briefing on the on the issue
reasonable person do their running that you're involved with this issue of marlon's was tells you it's all fine don't worry about it said the other person then get a second opinion about that lee kind of legal activity when does that again concern you admit to become and didn't get the case towards the concept that they should have