we have to read look the entire document as a document ok absolutely and that's it that's what it evident to evidence the intent of the parties absolutely that's your whole argument is it absolutely because we have so many this is really together when you have just a clear indication of how it's to be used and if it's going to be used but if it's used for different purposes that river that is that is very compelling these things will really add up and the jozy and the will this be for this matter  they're saying well by the way if you don't do this we'll come in because we want our own and we're going to take back ownership and then they also have you got to live with the homestudy issue right and also exemption makes sense because is the magnolia case and there you know we have a different situation we have them see them being warrant so it's you know warrantied statutory form description and then it says for to be used as a road purpose and are exactly right on that so that cardinal rule in illinois is to ascertain the intention of the parties were to look at the four corners of the deed right that's where we are and so we have to look at the four corners of the deed and in these deeds we have we have that other factor showing is exactly why they're doing extremely important because that's the context of the deed so we have it so that's what about the point how you say the real estate to where they're pointing true in your view they're actually pointing to the tracks that are on the ground that's right it's a mistake to be this without reading the whole entire description right and so in the description after it says all interests in the public describe reality to wit call and then separate paragraph the right of way for our purposes over an across what a strip of land fifty feet in width being twenty feet by feet and i said cent following what we're talking about is the next paragraph which begins with the word as i point out your opposing counsel but this grant is upon the express conditions and those conditions according to your opposing counsel are not m gave you and as a factual matter the rabbit appears to have had past your chains going to and from for some time but they stopped in the early one nine hundred and so at some point they say they stopped complying with this language but it's very important to look at the reversionary interest which  brought up on by the court because there there's an automatic reversion sometimes and then there's a permissive version here we have a permissive one where they actually have to come back in and we assert themselves if they already own the property would they w you know right to be entered into on because it would have already owned it and we see that easements we see sometimes possibilities of revert but it states shall offer or there's some sort of automatic operation that's not what we have here because this is  something i'm going out the window i'm not going to prescribe do you want to know it all it's our right away running over fifty feet of my property right you know that that's exactly right is important distinction is ours here as well because it's already there they're referring to it as right away and that's a distinction in the station wasn't suggesting that there was an existing no something needed to build and maintain it you're right and they needed to have passed the trains going to and from the city chicago are trying to go as i don't simply know already also that we're running over drones