empowered to the state of illinois department of insurance while she was working for the department of insurance she asked her supervisor tommy collier about getting a parking space and she's instructed by mr collier to one day on her way to work she parked in her assigned parking space and she got out of the car sure for you some items from her car she closed the door and due to ice on the ground she slipped  parking lot in that part and they would also have r p c in that building what i'm getting at is whether or not the space where your client fell was the space subject to simply subject to this list parking space the fact remains that this parking space where she parked was and assigned a parking space where members of the general public were not allowed to park so there was zero risk that a member of general of the general public would sit on this this parking space because members of the general public were not allowed to be at this parking space they're not allowed to be in the spot and never the general public cannot go up and send asking for a parking lot for locking space you said something just then and that it was actually the beast or who maintained the parking lot so it was on the carrier put rented the building from the city of harvey in the city of harvey maintain the parking fine and in that case the court still found maintained the parking lot it doesn't matter the employer the county the still more sponsor for that case just like in the present case the employer is still responsible regardless of whether they leased the building and whether the same thing we found of the jointer case that dealt with someone parked in a public parking lot so there was the exact same risk to members of the general public and the plaintiffs in that case  testimony that though she ducks and you'll get the part that's not quite what he said if you look at what he said first of all he said i don't know when she approached him but she approached him on the first date i don't know anything about her situation you can either go see go see him which i no connection between her being you know i'm the lease there's no connection between her being and why and i hurt her incidents as an employee of state in my and she has to go outside on her own to dubstep see is there evidence  non state employees going to sue them and getting spots in this particular lot a stir of these acts of kindness on non state employees who is there any evidence of that she is no other than just spaces address that the cook county case that council has pointed out it has attempted to make some type of a correlation i went through briefly in my brief some of the very distinguished factors in that case in this case obviously it's not relevant i guess or the cause of the accident itself is not relevant i think how she got there and why she's there the control of of the of the walk in the premises in general as far as her getting to that specific so and there's a state lot you seem to be saying is well you know if you got to walk ten blocks that's up to you or you've been using a lot if you follow a lot so big deal because you had a choice you could walk ten blocks you could possibly tomorrow that seem we appealed to the circuit court and then the state asked to be dismissed from the surface leaving based on that based on the workers compensation and you know unfortunately the law's the law that's what i would have liked to argue against if there and you know i don't think this month has brought any of his explain how that distinction makes a difference like how does that change the risk involved and still a greater risk to the plaintiffs than there is to members of the general  said so i know their argument doesn't make sense on that account and you know i just like to point out i know you brought up like she could park somewhere else and you know that's true in all these cases that you know