roadway infrastructure and it changes the agenda there or item a under new business krebs professional center exterior facade alteration has been pulled off the agenda of the owner does doesn't want to move potential buyer that wanted to put a professional office in there they wanted to come in and get plenty commissions opinion but the property is not even on public see any tears as they walk away making making three lots to pass recommending approval subject to the two conditions just to do my report which is what the county planning commission with the township it is become apparent that they need to go to board for a variance to encroach into the buffer from the rear that are in it or existing zoning ordinance requires july on the encroachment into the buffer with some tangled parking spaces in a retaining wall so that's the first variance recommendation that plane the commission needs to make to design a hearing for the second part of that is they to to they need to put a retaining wall in at the highest point it's eleven feet and we have to make plenty commissions required to make a recommendation to council on the retaining wall the buffer variance is needed in why the wa literally was almost going to send someone else to do this because i was embarrassed now i'm going to do three attorneys on this campus and my brother one any worse from you all drive me crazy but i can't do anything with circulation pattern around the site now so that's an entrance this is an exit they need to provide a drive through lane here for a drive through window and they've got plenty of stacking  that you know this that place gets busy enough to know can be stacking out in the hour ways in to accommodate the bypass laying around the drive through and the circulation patterns and these angles spaces were best so we looked at it possibly lessening the wall height but all that does we were looking at maybe tearing it all that does is push it further back the into the buffer so we wanted to leave adequate room here between the property line in the wall so that often plantings can be accommodated as well as we are recommending they were very very similar in size so this is a new building in part we wiped away that we're going to use as much of the existing structure as possible but that building is if it's challenged i've had my engineers in there and  what what i'm concerned about i didn't you never know the scope of that until we really get in there and start knocking down walls but i'll give you a similar situation that occurred to me in my call years township project or through fifty engineer to me and said this is not structurally sound so we ended up actually having to take down most of the structure but it was just it was a structural concern from the engineer which obviously we would  had to spare and if the structural engineer came in and said this is not good and being through that building it's had several renovations over the fifty years that it's been open it's messy you really can't  which the applicant is not see in them but the recall under equal retaining wall system should be noted on the be limited to the maximum by which he sees saying twelve but it's actually eleven point two six in he wants a fence which i have in my recommendation also he wants the how close are we allowed to great to the property line michael probably you want to just go through here sure just talked about changing one to a four foot black chain link fence incorporated in the wall buffer the  placement of additional parking entertain won't interfere our twenty five foot setback so that the reduction is from twenty five feet to ten feet and that they approve the construction of a retaining wall at the rear of the site that exceeds the six foot maximum height currently in ordinance in conjunction with those six comments in staffs letter july first two thousand fifteen with the changes noted that number one a four foot black chain link fence will be incorporated into the retaining wall design and that number two to retain more material and color scheme and complement the proposed exterior facade of the building which will be a part of the final site will prove also in accordance with the challenged engineers letter of july sixth and those four