application for political style on and in particular its finding that his fears of future persecution by the moroccan government are too speculative to justify a grant of relief and middle east would be a decision in this case like any agency and in this in this case to be as decision fails to inspire any confidence that if you feel that responsibility it's conclusion for example that there is no apparent connection between moroccan police his visit to my client home in april two thousand and one had no connection with his previous participation in a political demonstration four months earlier gives no apparent consideration of fact to the two of his friends from his circuit it's presumed that actions like this have a political motivation and perspectively in the absence of any indication that they had that my clients have broken any laws or any other reason to have continued detention by the police if there is no evidence as to whether or not the three persons were arrested broke the law and are in custody because of the fact that the group of law that correct i was saying yes there is in the absence of any indication that they've broken any criminal statutes it's presume that the police's action particularly in conjunction with their oppression the problem we don't know whether or not those two persons broke the law or not why would we presume that the police were acting illegally and that they were acting for political motives because there is no indication of the contrary the participants in this worldwide day of demonstration had broken the laws and i can't say that i know anything about about the demonstration that took place in casa blanca and i don't know why from two people that the petitioner knew that were detained briefly by the police why we w then presume that the police had arrested them on one of the grounds on which one of the suspect grounds on which we vikram asylum and why we would we would say well because they addressed the truth of his friends at this at this demonstration  he must also be and must be in danger of being persecuted on on political grounds well first of all these friends were not detained temporarily they were in custody for two and a half years later on the day of his final hearing that's number one and number two is met we're asking you to look at the cumulative impact of all the evidence in the record not just that fact the board concludes for instance that there's no apparent indication of why the police came to talk to my client but in fact the record establishes when they came to his house in april two thousand and one their intention was to take him to the station that they had then indicators and implied in the neville an intent by saying they would follow other laws if he didn't comply let me just stop you it's not just you wait in where he wasn't living there be another herd's he never came back while he was there was in a situation where they posted somebody there to arrest him on the spot they simply advised his mother i think it was  to have him come to the station when she saw him next yes doesn't seem to me to be that much concern on the part of the police when i think it's said he must accompany them to the station which indicated their intention to take him well let me ask this there's no arbitrary detention that they keep people in detention up to one year on contrived criminal grounds that there are seven hundred people alone in the western sahara that have been in there in custody for for advocating independence that they utilized torture against detainees and that they held many incommunicado so the b a s reference this singular excerpt not even from their report from and that's the international and ignoring the wealth of other information which supports the contrary conclusion that they have a poor human rights record and particularly that they repress just an opinion oath to mentally my client only has to establish a more or less that is a sort of selective citation of the record and it's a really the whole idea of asylum is that he's a reasonable person standard i certainly see that there is a connection between  demonstration and they're coming back to look for him they're hostile attitude towards the demonstrators and generally the rest of his friends to back the use detention against again he and their hostile attitude towards his mother and containing search for him i think supports a probability that they that they learn from his friends his identity and are looking to arrest him at the very least it's got to be ten percent and that's all he has to show thank you others if there are more hou morning your honor may please the court i'm anthony kasem represent the attorney general in this case he should be what this court is very now and it's relatively straightforward whether the evidence compels the conclusion contrary to that reached by the immigration judge i believe it's on record other pieces of evidence in the record and the lack of certain evidence that shows that he has not shown that this conclusion reached is compelled to be reversed by this court but the fact that it hasn't been banned doesn't necessarily mean that it is organization or even aware that he was a member there's no i was present on that issue there's no evidence that the police were generally speaking out members of this group after the demonstration there's no evidence that we have to none because they did not affirm the credibility finding pursue to the president of the of the circuit who was he he was beaten at the day the demonstration with a wooden rod but did not receive any hospitalization did not seek any understand their pleadings is the arrest of two friends and the police visit for half months later but there's been no nexus i mean it has to be someone looking for hand you know have to be concerned some saw evidence presented that there is some link to hades participation in a group which he deems political and also religious goes back and forth and some fear of persecution now what i mean there must be some link between those two and you know i think there is otherwise otherwise any of these thousands or millions demonstrators there and the record says that the i think the choir should be the other way around has the has the petitioner presented any evidence that what the police were there for was part of what was in relation to his on the statutory grounds that demonstration and that they were looking for him later and that his friends are in prison still because of their participation in the demonstration that their membership in this organization i don't  been evidence for instance as we see in many cases that he was a leader of the organization that he have some general responsibilities that he participated in law was that you had to show that he had been singled out that they knew military had no responsibilities and no leadership position he made it that nothing distinguish him from any other member of the organization as far back at one twenty five he and in fact if the police don't even know he's a member of the organization  this was a nationwide demonstration with international human rights i would i think i would agree with you if all he said was that he was at the at the demonstration and that friends who were at the demonstration or were  singled out were arrested and detained in persecuted but and still there but i guess i don't see how you can make the argument that how that you can conclude that there is no inference warranted very briefly your honour's my client was twenty five years old when these events occurred never apparently had any problem with iraq i'm pleased any contact with them than erastus for months after friends get arrested well there's no they have a record clearance in terms of and its applications and he's never been arrested or anything of that direction for months after demonstration where two friends are arrested ten hours from is found they get around to coming to his house and there's no apparent connection or at least a plausible connection to that strongly disagree the standard is that it is well recognized in the circuit that that applicants aren't expected to be able to provide conclusive proof of motive it's some evidence evidence of the intent doesn't there well what the intent is the persistence of them finding him i also insist that they didn't just say they want to talk to him they said if he doesn't come we're going to be following other law saying this is a reasonable person a humanitarian form of relief we're not trying to prove something by proponents or beyond reason that we're trying to prove a possibility and suggest that this evidence doesn't support the possibility t