evidence showing that the police found an arsenal of weapons in the skins always house and in a car you couldn't an assault rifle but high capacity magazines six loaded semiautomatic handguns several additional that there is no conflict between statutory sections and the rules of evidence but that it just simply ignores the facial conflict that exists between these just these two provisions want to revise our opportunity for cross examination the other one does not both they never addressed the specific argument of clear picture they discussed the confrontation because that was one part part of the argument and the other question was whether america prosecution does constitute a domestic violence prosecution those are the two issues in clearly and richter here is a question of which is the appropriate statutory subsection that is she's never addressed neither those cases and never brought up so if this is a different issue than the issues that were decided in those cases answer yours your follow up question which is yes it can similarly in a bra greeting of ten point two eight that unable to be present because of health reasons this could apply to because the witnesses  morning voluntary manslaughter instruction so the question is not not simply to defend a couple of them in this matter but her degree of culpability and bringing in this evidence all this gun evidence and or all these evident these simply this is this is very relevant evidence in this case of course we're talking about a murder case where the victim  you all all of that things and these the fact that these guns existed in the as the offices confiscated them and pictures of them in the you know the weapons of themselves this is all relevant to suggested that there was there was enough evidence to begin with aside from these guns to amount to a conviction so what is what's the harm here if there was if the medical evidence and the defendant's incredible testimony altercation and and partly the medical evidence all establish that these injuries could not have been sustained from just the simple fall more specifically there are two separate areas of trauma to the brain and of course the credibility your story didn't make any sense in light of the medical testimony and of course above and beyond aside from the the physical weapons we still rated music's testimony you can still consider lots of it regardless of the weapons themselves she testified of a prior incidents where the defendant hits the victim in me in the arm and the music observe this and that the the the fine and who the victim is so hard is she lost her zero four or ten point four are more applicable of course the fine is argued neither of those apply when you apply facts to that but the but the people who are arguing a brief and i'm arguing right now that these are just governance that is in conflict with the rule contained in the only rules of evidence and quote i think i think there we have it there the committee tells us there's no conflict so i don't understand how ten points way can be preempted by a rule created by this committee when the committee and the committees telling us that there is no conflict and of course the committee didn't mention there was a conflict between other rules and statutes not relevant here were six or ninety one section five dash one fifty subsection one see get that and more into the reason why i don't think there would be a conflict even if we're going to ignore the committee's comments which i don't think of course we should do very i think ten points always a very specific statute i think   that's the reason moving on to the difference between ten points away and why that's still applicable despite the existence of and one for that's the reason and if we're getting into a discussion of whether of which the statute is more specific of health and than that so ted thank you very much so ten point two sir that point to a certainly qualifies under that part and the people we've just overall submit that because this is ten points away specifically deals with domestic violence prosecutions it was that we'll hear it and the people will point to again the cases of rigor from twenty twelve and clearly from this court twenty thirteen those cases dealt with