MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
killing nasty stuff in the whole of the book right like zebra mussels and other nuisance b c s who are transporting it along with water we don't want to release those into different water and let them take over  you can hopefully kill all the lackey's species but i mean just as a general proposition would what's on obvious about combining two things that perform the function that they are already well known for an invention you know what we're both we both are going to kill you we have the object of killing you that's what is the advantage why this is can you get a patent on the fact that we decided to do it together well he said and by the way i don't actually  tap me to my saying that brooks doesn't that necessarily or many times cause hypoxia at the same time because her hyper kept tapping at you're increasing the carbon dioxide which i would think would necessarily decrease the amount of oxygen species and then maybe both have different levels of effect of miss with different kinds of species so why wouldn't you got a bunch of water you know why not like i just don't understand why they're both doing exactly what they're supposed to do so why wouldn't you just use them under substantial evidence for a fact finding it made about something the reference actually says because your expert says he thinks the referent says it in a mistaken way that is the quintessential sort of fact finding bodies job and i'm an  of that how it's used in this reference and what it teaches want to scale the are is a fact finding in the board made express and specific fact findings about that reference well i don't see your calling into question and you seem like a smart guy maybe i would believe you if i got to decide that doing it but when judge lynn pointed inclined to none of those elements are certainly there i know there are a lot of claims that issue are those elements present in one of the other claims that are on appeal to us such that maybe there is a basis for coming out different ways on different claims not significantly say ok got it that's all i just want to make it look it's hard to keep all these things straight but i think i have a nice little charger that does it so i'm trying to follow so you believe they cite one for that and you don't think
might say that this person let's say you functionally limited and disabled but then you have to look at everything else as a brief inclusionary is his opinion supported by for objective studies clinical findings if they are there and you give the treating doctor's opinion as great a weight and in this case the strange thing is true you look at the other factors the concept of exam or look at the records the other volume of treatment records that were available at that time and using those factors then you determine who however in this case substantial evidence supports the l g s finding that claim it retains the ability to perform medium work generally more weight is given to the report of an examining physician and to not examine exemption and even if doctor
family you know what how many people like the classics not mean the real standards i'm talking about going way way way back to  on saturday  we want to thank rex for being here and x factor you guys sound great thanks for coming i know it was a long drive we got a lot of love for the blues and for everybody here you want to introduce the band ladies and gentlemen would you
maybe next year if they have opportunity for us to come to this country as we would love to come again
and i think it's clear in our grace but i'd like to see it again because i think this is where judges mature and drop the bar in the back in case there are two shields i play here the first shields or just justice misapprehension of fact that's not the case here for two reasons number one and i want to make it very clear because i don't think it's clear in my brief and i apologize for that fact appellants counsel in the state court of appeal cited for overseas roberts counsel also cited two or overseas ohio excuse me versus roberts in the petition for reviews the california supreme court so that issue was well known to the courts as to whether or not this was a contrary to that high court's decisions all screening those two points together number one the court both the california court of appeal feels decision which is the issue to me from the district court standpoint was aware of the roberts issue because  something and i'm certainly not asking for you to concede that the first constitutionally are either proffer an error because it really is retroactive or constitutionally or even without proffered assuming that what's the to the events occurring to him and as the court is obviously aware of what i heard is on cross examination the prosecutor asked the detective in addition to the other people that you've interviewed house where the abduction occurred the petitioner also told the jury yes i was that the friend's house or the relative's house later on down the road were other the middle ations occurred or at least the man
therefore i'm going to move on to the argument relating to two pain or which was filed in the federal
record is eight thirty one atlanta second three thirty three thirty five at three forty nine to three fifty and the ruling of the delaware supreme court affirming yes that's the lore american legacy foundation of you lorillard tobacco companies a story court right delaware chancery court you have that decision eight thirty one atlantic second three thirty five at three forty nine to three fifty had the language  is that the that the contract that you had was both expressing implied well it deals with express in one place and then has a separate section dealing with implied but it's the language that i quoted and there's an extended discussion of it but the key part of the language and i'm happy to go back through for more is non signatories may implicitly adopt a contract contract through their conduct rather than through their words they're making it stinks in there between adopting it through conduct is imply adopting it through words as express and then they go on to have a discussion of that and say this is precisely what has happened here as the foundation has no in the accepted benefits under the m s a conferred by the both essentially they found it was both they decided they didn't have to decide between the two and that was affirmed by the delaware supreme court and when national union argues that the fact that lorillard abandon the allegations  its amended complaint of an implied contract number one i read you the language saying they still said it was implicit in an implied contract but number two where they dropped the language an implied contract they inserted a reference to this decision of the delaware chancery court in other words what they were saying is instead of saying it's express or saying that it's implied we're simply going to refer in our allegations to the decision of the delaware chancery court that's why they dropped it but the point is even if they had to stop raise you want to ship you know even if they haven't the point is not only did they allege it consistently in all of the complaints including the delaware amended complaint but it's a ruling in the case that was affirmed on appeal that would of issues that we have to get through it would be helpful to have a transcript of these proceedings so i would ask for a transcript the parties to share the cost please speak to the cart before you leave to arrange for a transcript of the proceedings i thank
attend in chambers conference between his attorney the court and the prosecutor where substantive issues were discussed about his three peaches transcript prior to his response on the amount of the restitution so it's not wrong temporal gap between and him being at you know him being sworn in told or you talk truth and then him answering yes yes yes  sentencing phase of that i'm pretty sure he was thinking i'm going to get up forty to ninety thousand dollars a loss amount or forty to ninety thousand dollars of restitution when he came back he trusted his attorney to make those arguments when they weren't way if he's not a lawyer if he wasn't the case the legal system this is a first of all with the law and the court made no attempt to actually describe to mr johnson what took place in the back of the courtroom without his presence and we believe that that wasn't acting as mr johnson's agent during that discussion this is common place for prisons investigations as a whole what objections to raise the courts when it when the issues restitution is clearly within that core claims that a client and deputized his attorney to decide for him and even beyond that if that isn't true the court then soon after came on the record judge brinn as you noted ask mr johnson  problem the hearing and seeing hearing on the record what occurred on the record cured any potential problem for that reason mr johnson can't overcome his appeal waiver certainly felt right rose the level of some minimal civilized procedure much less you can't show an
but take a look at the family album the man behind the legend they walked side by side reviewing the past planning a future together country country school house is banished and the energy of the children is no longer awaited and walk miles to get
the people of the town that long wondered about simon road for thirty years a man lives alone in a house with a bed a chair with the music in the faded symbols of the time when he was young for thirty years every day every moment outside his work for a living in the light and in the darkness simon road labored to express the dream as the towers became a part of the landscape the neighbor is living under their shadow were sometimes doubtful sometimes tolerant  that he wanted to do could be done with the simplest of tools and with his
there is a road that lies under northern skies toward the land of the midnight sun crosses the crest of the great northwest and it's known as the el can run lighting time i met wrong northern climb alone against all nature's might the cuts made by chevy might medium heavy roared into the wilderness night  this is a c one twenty four the largest transport plane in the air force it's no picnic flying a payload over country like this one i saw moves in over those mountains and you're heading for trouble  a ground control approach the eyes of the air force guiding planes to safety in bad weather situations every precaution is taken including an emergency standby generator is really where a whole another air force mission accomplished no sweat thanks to g c s once the c one twenty four is safely down the ground crew rolls out the great tractors towed trucks forklifts vital power can waste away because this battery comes bone dry only when fluid is added there's a duck o dried charge battery come to life ready for a fast start dependable garments anywhere under all conditions
for the north pole sap is reading your letter now the children are amazed here they are sitting and then listening intently attending explains that every year just before thanksgiving he starts to marry you and tide by visiting towns and cities whole over with all the big new shopping centers opening everywhere that it has to use his new rocks to get around but he still uses his reindeer on christmas eve they can get him just anywhere and he's so proud of them in this little story they make the ribbon turn out the rain and make your home so bright and cheery it fills the air with christmas spirit oh yes baby brother is quite a helper to every dog must have a head and also have a body these busy elves on spinning always turn out the long thin body the others paint their saucy faces and put them all together tour of sandals happyland would not be quite complete without a visit to his big toy warehouse not far from the street there's gift tours for everyone it's really a big everywhere and said i needed them to you line them up you turn them on those funny little boys the monkey drums and drums and drums they never get tired are old mother bear she and enjoy these pretty dolls and dick shows no deli all children like to make some noise instead of music to a piano or drum will give them hours of fun the older children like to build and here's a boat to prove it trains of all kinds coming in going starting and stopping logging trains parade trains preen line all the time to choose the bed daddy would enjoy this to look at that circus parade
she must know how to make her home comfortable and invite she must know the worth of labor saving device and how best to conserve her time and energy she must know clothes how to buy and how to make them he m she must make social contact i'm sorry for the paint on the front porch is still awa
proper consideration present this present situation  yes yes
something i'm reading about black oak windshields broken by thrown rocks on cryin ave near i eighty let's take that one out you want to check that one this is a region underground come out where we're streaming world wide by the way  that oh anybody there mr right now no one ever thinks he's been a funny man you want to take the rest of the day after that what you're pushing for you could say you could say goodbye to your chat mates and head on over manifesto you got to go out and kill as many americans as you can i didn't i read i don't think small towns but pick high profile targets i didn't really do a lot of americans at once i didn't read that i only want to i don't even want to speculate on what he might be talking about what a great religion they represent and i'm just i don't know what i'm playing the religion it's just the guy that it's not it's not the relief of no it's not the belief of all muslims to  kill americans let me ask you something the guy that was going to do the play and the other one how do you know i'm not i'm not from india i was there and the guy that was going to do the one jetliner the other day jumped up and screamed our path and was running from the c sack a very small portion of that's like calling all christians baptist well you know that this is just a sect part of cricket that's what this is just the part of of the qur'an doesn't sanctify beheadings and stuff of your enemy i don't think so who is your enemy tell me who your enemy is i don't have an they just pick one if they don't have  i understand that but if i got off a plane in saudi arabia i think someone's going to take a chainsaw and wipe off my head i think before i get to know i said don't think that i don't think the muslim religion preaches islam preaches saying you said the religion is is being used there they use it as their holy war they want the united states out of the middle east that's one issue they also want the palestinians to return to jerusalem the promise land or what have you though they call it the holy land once right out of the middle east and we give the palestinians extremists all right ok i don't i disagree with you i don't know i don't even have a clue i don't even have a clue what you're talking about to be honest with you i really don't you lost me there man there was a delta airlines out west  could do all that but but she's not but she's not she's not picking her but she is not a sinner she is not a muslim she's something else she's the oracle of  indiana state police and lake county sheriff's department responded to the area at three forty six whoa whoa you at three forty six can you prove where you were yeah from multiple reports of windshields being damaged by  i'm so glad is that happened to me while officers were at the scene two more drivers that the top police would just have been damaged by rocks that's right by black oak now look who responds to this ranger according to exactly we will in ninety eight he was like thirteen and i was working there as a as a ranger and he was the kind of kid the old no he was thirteen i was old of course to a thirteen year old but that's so cool
every wind carried the smell of damp earth and the red bark of trees drenched by soft spring rain now came the moment we waited for so long when the water strikes these player gates they disintegrate there into their original structure and the cover begins all over again so all that's what your plants are up against i told them bad soil structure find out the hard way then the big moment then went to see that were to become such beautiful flowers meanwhile in spite of our nosy neighbors jim was having a wonderful time taking plants out of pots and putting them into the ground he had never done anything like this before and he was amazed to find out how good he was at it the weeks went by never had there been such a perfect spring flowers by the million blooming everywhere except in our own garden even our most promising plan to turn brown and likely still we did have one prized bloom a lovely lovely brave little value that we've grown from see when the storm finally stopped we went out to see what the damage was the rain it torn deep gashes in our soil the storm didn't seem to have bothered mrs harrington at all she without thinking plo imagine my consternation when i found out they were for me i knew she meant well but i didn't want her flowers i wanted my  how did they do it well why not however we went to get the advice we should have taken in the first pla when they got all through i said well folks don't get discouraged it takes a lot of things to make a garden grow and one of the most important is the physical structure of the soil itself is something you ought to try and you chemical time conditions are called i'm made by monsanto to really do a job and i'm miserable soil of yours i wish we'd had it ten years ago when we first started our gun it is saved us a lot of time and a lot of
little too many to have my dear promoted you know i bet you think nothing now
baker would you think of senator dan coats interesting i like to hear him call the radio station a little more often you know it's think of all the stuff that decades got to worry about his job every day i mean between the looking at it from a little more macro perspective i mean there's a lot of instability across the world and you know with with things going on in china where do they stand on all of this stuff because based on watching the news going back to the ukraine when a bunch of troops go into another country and set up shop isn't it kind of an invasion whether or not they shoot their gun or not i mean it tends to be a show of force if i'm not mistaken but you know hey i'm just a guy from the region with the how do i know you you know i mean he's right i guess you don't think of that you don't think about right well i think karl from has phil called up and said remember how world war one started with the arts duke of ferdinand getting killed and nobody  knew next thing you know we got a world war and he's like this is what i feel what it feels like right now and and that we have to you know try to make sure that that doesn't happen but the end the question is to make sure that that doesn't happen is the best way of doing about doing it a just putting up a huge blockade on russia and going after them very sternly and telling them how it's going to be or just let it play out a little bit and use diplomacy in other words to be aggressive or do you sit back a little bit you know what i mean and see what they're really going to do and that's a tough decisions and tony decision you know you look at it from the standpoint of you know the republicans in the democrats at the in the inside the beltway anything that has to do with domestic policy they can't stand each other i mean they're just fighting each other just for the sake of fighting each other then you start looking at it on a global perspective how are those people now after punching each other in the nose every day and domestic stuff sometimes if just bring it to the region i mean if you've got a you know a bunch of guys that are physically i'm in a scene utilize that to get their way are you going to be able to go up there and tell them some diplomacy or are they going to just lot mark two hundred ninety four five eleven hundred what's your name tom what's up i want to talk about this parking situation and munster yes go ahead i want i want to grow older and i'm a little shops of new shops there wasn't any
allow him to withdraw his guilty plea here and as i cited in the davis case the standard here is whether he presents any fair and reasonable reason for allowing him to withdraw his guilty plea and that this should be liberally construed by the district court in the davis case well here he didn't misunderstand anything that is directly related to his criminal case which was true in davis or the actual sentence to be imposed for very address that because your honor i actually respectfully disagree with that analysis brought up by the government if that it's actually about collateral consequences that it's really about a misunderstanding of the term of the sentence which is a supervised release  here is not claiming that anything negative that's going to happen in his immigration status as a result of his guilty plea in the cases cited by the government here in their brief a deal with this saying that if i enter a guilty plea then i'm going to be deported and that would be collateral consequences was the deportation here the there isn't anything different that immigration was going to do to mr profound as a result of his guilty plea it's about his mis apprehending supervised release doesn't have anything to do with his being in custody right now you're correct about that in as i understand it from my client's point of view and you know we've gone over sort of where we are procedurally in all of this with him and he persists in wanting to say that based and it was he said it i mean it's his position was fresh his understanding about what supervised release was was it was that it's something different it was an inducement is a reason why he entered into the guilty plea in the first place and i situation and we say that that's a legitimate reason because he wasn't advised i mean you're saying well there's he's misunderstanding correct if he's misunderstanding what the term supervised release here is that he is awaiting to be deported to gambia his he the deportation order is in place and gambia will not accept him because of whatever happens between our two countries so he's done that position which actually was referred to in the affidavit by the immigration attorney which is where supervised release usually comes into effect in an immigration thing that's correct that's correct and with one addition there's there is a civil case in the ninth circuit twenty two forty one it is pending but in terms of the deportation part you're correct your know he is still detained and when i checked this morning totally the individual that i spoke with said they are waiting to travel documents to gambia so i cannot confirm one way or the other whether or not he could be deported wednesday probably knows but we're not going to ask but in any event if i could just make a couple of very quick points with respect to my argument here it is a collateral matter and quite frankly on i'm a bit perplexed by how he comes to this