reconsider it sure did not show any error of law or fact within the agency's decision or concluded that he did not demonstrate through sufficient record evidence eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal on account of their religious beliefs a constant characterization i would have when i'm listening to patricia ordinates he seems to have have a quarrel with the immigration judges consideration of the evidence rather than pointing to any error committed that would render that agenc to your question when you review the record i think well if you would indulge me i think that the immigration judge and the board considered all the evidence they cited to the documentary evidence to test with the petitioner the petitioners witness if  you watch the immigration judge throughout the hearing he's very you appear to be very engaged he was asking questions he had a full conversation with the witness elder yeah how about the different bibles and the different translations for why his church chose to use the recovery bible verses the king james bible and the witness said it was really because of the of the correct translation and that's why they chose it they talked about how now the new generation is using their phones to uses the bible but it really wasn't like we use this recovery bible because it is the only bible the shutters used so the judge really considered that information and even at the end the immigration judge the documents and talked about the claim that the church is a shouters church the church a trance and also the bible and he was asking counsel can you thread the needle for me i know that there are these documents and stuff even cited to rand and said in apparent suggestion that he would give more time if you need to get more information it looks like he was really trying to tie these together or have a council tie these together and in the end statement but i think the one dimensional statement without being able to question the sister about what exactly happened and what exactly the chinese government or the officers of wanted him to write in a letter so i see your point sir and i and i agree that it doesn't necessarily matter witness yasid they don't consider the shouters if china considers them shouters are kind of a lock i understand that what i think that i git was saying was afaik it seems like the evidence that was presented all pointed in one direction that i mean setting aside the shouter if you are carrying the recovery version of the bible you're presuming to be in a poll you know whether it's the shower or some other aspect in china and that there seemed to be evidence to support that view what was the evidence that would suggest that an individual could go to china hold the recovery version of the bible make it public and not be a subject to persecution we are on our own i don't think that there's necessarily evidence supporting that but what i do think i jus relied on was the fact that it didn't necessarily the record did not reflect that he had to have a recovery version and i think if you look at the current best friend like you the right i mean there's no to no it's not well your honor when he talks about why he bought the version for his sister in church is a gift shop he didn't say i bought this because this is the recovery version that the shouters jews or the my church is he said it was d it's it's the revised version the bible we use i think i'm honor i mean it's when it's government considers anybody who has this version of the bible or souter and they discriminate against shouters why does it make any difference what is subject to motivations were well i think it would be more of like when you go to the point about the immigration judge and the board finding that there's not enough evidence to show that you wouldn't go i guess does he have to have that bible when you talk to elder y when they had the discussion the immigration judge noted that it wasn't there's one christian bible there's many versions and that just happen to be one they use but it doesn't have to be the only version you use it's a christian china yeah that's a very problematic argument  translation but they're all the christian bible older yes that he just preferred to use that because he felt that was the most accurate and they had further discussion so it's not saying you know what you should give up your religion and be and  do something else it's saying it does i think the evidence kind of reflects that he doesn't like it doesn't necessarily care that he was seeking out the shadow religion alone he was a christian and that if that's the case then just could you return to china you didn't say you wouldn't attend the same church or sister attended which is a government sanctioned he didn't say that he'd have to go immigration judges determination that her situation is most aligned with two and that was a situation where someone was detained for three days based on their religion and that was not to be persecution will i think if there is evidence i'm sorry i'm just i really just i'm asking i just want to know whether there's just you know on this question if there were evidence let's say it was even stronger that th the chinese government sent him a letter and said if you return back you're going to be imprisoned for three days which would be the government's position be well who cares that's not enough of a harm to be considered fear