and he he approached the vehicle on the passenger side requesting their information to get back to is his vehicle and began running their information after after a few minutes he then called uber him to come finished writing the warning for abraham that should have been stopped was over he should have handed him the warning picked it and said be on your way here and that was it he in order to extend the stop beyond that point he would have needed reasonable suspicion that they were engaged in criminal activity he did not have that based on the record in this case so that that timeline that he took to return the rental people were to the that's that's probably permissible because he said he had to return the item but the additional questioning for several minutes afterwards that certainly is not permissible regarding the stop  to that they answered the question from a holding manner and didn't give him exact answers and that they appeared nervous space that a variety of these things however did not amount to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity now the car stopping the right lane of traffic is usual but this is not indicative of criminal activity rather to show someone is tell he's positing trying to come up with words he apologise several times for not being comfortable with english and so some of that is likely from the language where there are some things that tri see their heart rate in their back or in the valley at night from a distance all of these and see described were at the very beginning of the stop and anybody would be nervous when a police officer pulls him over particularly nervous and as we got into in the briefs the mere fact that a person is nervous does not automatically mean there's criminal activity it could be a factor but they also seem to seem to equate the fact that these people were nervous with his believe that they're engaged in criminal activity and that we we don't necessarily have to give deference at the outset we can give different that he observed various things he perceive them to be nervous but that he brought one of them back to his wife are he separated that that would increase some of their says it was just a warning why are you making me sit in the police service that that had to be pretty troublesome especially someone who had never interact with  police officers that if this wasn't the you know if this was merely a warning why did you need to separate him from his cousin and call for backup and that it just trigger what he's got doing these things that i'm simply pointing out that the officer immediately looked at each one of these things and assumed criminality when that may not be the most reasonable explanation of each of these things when looking at these things it still must be a reasonable officers  reasonable police officer based on their observations depress reasonable suspicion at the time you extend stop if an officer assumes that every person pulls over is a criminal and and you know sort of everything takes everything that happens you couldn't understand them because the whole thing nature of the explanation made him feel to him sounded like he was making up the story on the spot and that him was another factor but when it was totality of circumstances provided in his mind reasonable suspicion bit once they realize that it's just going to be a warning and not a ticket no points on their license no council regarding trooper one he says observation that you bring him seemed nervous throughout the whole stop and be very very this the video simply doesn't work like that when he turns on the camera that shows the internal view of the brand sitting in the seat tobacco and talk about the different brands that they use and both put smokeless tobacco away it seems a pretty calm casual encounter oh they were sitting there and terms of something that shows what trooper