is that christopher's personality following this incident and during the police interviews was entirely consistent with his personality at all other times we have testimony from a number of different state's witnesses in a number of different flight from a police officer can be perhaps probable cause or a reasonable suspicion so in any case where you have something like that long white that's arguably more relevant to this case then then then then what we have even if it is consistent with someone is personality and i would also respectfully suggest your honor that that the hypothetical that you post is is this is sort of unusual very few people have a personality trait that have to flee had long been the police every time you see police officers many people including the defendant mr on in this case have very bland low key but the shy personnel that isn't there a difference between you know very action including facial expression if i understand your honest question correctly people react to situations stressful situations from any situations and in very different ways if it's the state yes presenting this is evidence of mr voss feel that's the state's obligation to present evidence somehow that mr vance consistent personality and other times and the after these events is somehow evidence of  that the state can't argue that a person's demeanor when being interviewed by the police can be evidence circumstantial evidence that you were not asking for somehow aggressively or or angrily or so or and i still think that might have indicated that perhaps he was prone to something like this we have somebody who uses a bland low key kind of a mellow guy then they presented these d v d s and then they went after it in their in their bottle argument very systematically saying this is his personality is somehow and you give up his guilt and then we have to wrap this is we have the jurors who came out and told us in this media interviews that they consider mr wise personality so we have a situation here where all we've got is this guy's personality and all it is i can't i can't tell your honor to a mathematical certainty that the result would be different what i can argue and what i am trying to argue is that every defendant regardless of what their jars with as is highest crime it might be as a right to have their guilt or innocence determined on the elements of the crime and the stuff that that got it got thrown in there that was nothing more than in christopher's personality that was consistent throughout his entire life and consist where we have that here we've got the jurors telling us that he made a difference they told us they told us flat out now we're not arguing that the juror said that that was the only reason that we can see that it's not but the jurors came right out and they told us this was that's that's a that's a fair question and all i can do is retreat back to my main point is that the state thought this was important enough to hit it in all its opening statement present testimony on its show long long long d v d s and then next trial you're saying way beyond mr vons personality but to address the arguments the small of them the case law that says that it isn't totally proper for a jury or for evidence his reaction was inappropriate and that the circumstances of of finding out that his wife and children were dead and the felon can argue that this is just his personality based  he laughed you could argue that that was inappropriate and so you know what we have here is evidence  he's got a plan a low key nothing else personality that's all the video shows in terms of the of the defense demeanor it doesn't show anything other than that the second thing i'd like to talk about your grief from the personality throughout lose it all on the legal issue so if if your arguments grow then wouldn't you would you not be able to help with your instruction if they show this video that you're jurors you're not you cannot use the defendant's