colleagues representing appellee in their papers call barry a vehicle security system and very is both of these things but to say that a vehicle network of distributes components is a wireless security device as that term is used in the eight hundred and ninety five patent would be that's correct about i believe the specification discusses wireless security device in that way did it would be beyond the broadest reasonable interpretation in light of how that term is discussed in the specification ok so the broadest possible interpretation of while the security device mention this in our briefing if we were considering what a wireless security device is in the abstract but that's not the right inquiry if we consider the broadest reasonable interpretation in light of the wireless security device comprising and then it lists all the hardware that has to be in there the processor reckless transceiver the memory computer program and i see you know an alley guess language in the specification it sounds for example in the summary brief summary of the disclosure why isn't that definitional of what are wireless security device is it something that has all of these component part i think looking at it that way your honor you are still outside of the broadest reasonable interpretation in light of the purpose of the invention and that takes me a little bit more to perhaps if we were your main argument is that the construction inconsistent with the it so moving on i wanted to just one little offshoot of this argument relates to claim seven specifically where the board found that light which didn't disclose the vibration motor vehicle steering wheel fifty one and there's no people see for steering wheel in these drawings and that's the only place that like talks about adding a vibration motor so we don't see how light can be used to show recently expectation truly distinguishes between play and send and under that very clearly only plays a pre recorded emergency message play is communicating a message an audible form such as voice and you can see this in appendix the way to think of this is that with playing nothing is left with the recipient like if someone plays your piece of music you don't leave the performance of that piece of music when something is sent in contrast such as a text message the person on the other end of the telephone call in this case can view that data and appellee agrees that this is what the eight hundred and ninety five pattern says sending is also you can find that o on page fifty one way to look at this would be when you send something to someone is left with what they have been sent it's with them so with these two things in mind very only discloses that the vehicle network is playing an emergency message after the dot is voice synthesised it's auto bleep played by the vehicle network and the recipient is not left with anything there's nothing that is sent to the twenty and in this part of barry a says it is your information received from the data processor sixteen is converted into audible speech signals and then is either communicated through a speaker thirty two or proc means seaver thirty eight for communication to say or telephone fifty transceiver across pico next forty six this language about how it's that's not being left with the recipient so it's a little bit like you know sort of a different analogy but if i hand you something versus if i mail you something you're both the whatever the whatever the item is it's getting to you but it's not the same way at all and so here  recipients so i view that as play and you work directly at the formal part of the sentence i would absolutely see as play can i ask one final question which is simply that this is a question  data and audio data can be sent over a bluetooth connection and that's precisely what's being disclosed here you have analog sound signals that represent audio and then they're processed at this transceiver so they turned to data and communicated over the w the claims don't limit the term and that in the abstract the term device is not limited in this way so the argument is entirely based on the written description of the room description doesn't matter states that a reply to any sort vary but that's just one way the vibrating element could be accomplished it could also be at the board found a replacement of the notification future area which is already part of the system as it seems it's arguments mostly based on the would just like to address one point which is this concept that was was raised in an earlier question and also echoed by apple which is that this idea that various disclosure of  bluetooth communication must mean sending and if we look at this from the perspective of the ninety five patent it discusses that playing can happen over bluetooth as well so the use of bluetooth really does seven through columns thirteen line five and if that is true as we submit that it is then i would amend my answer earlier that it's a question of fact because i believe it would then be a question of law because it goes to the meaning