MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
the clearest sentence that i think give us a good place to start this afternoon the issue in essence is whether a lot of is thicker than in other words government make it pretty clear that people will know how to deal with a situation where you have a vacuum then you have a biological father part of the reason why this is taken of course it has i think to be fair to patiently in the case itself is in my brief and basically that is maybe the strongest case for our position there the father ledger himself or the step seven eight filed  invitations out for language in the case that is that you that's nice and he has done so once you've seen it to that extent however he's not allowed to file a seventy so how do we get back to just one fuck well that's the important of the g m case that a for you know if you're a reasonably priced people you get it with them from his you kill people that yes the paternity of that father is at issue and for all these reasons i think i've got perfectly good notice on the have any dependents except this child my child with respect to whether to dash fourteen or one action is a freestanding action we believe that is yes and we believe that's why you need to he turned the more the merrier they all of this child nobody has a whole lot of money in this case all of them could easily support this child and she still wouldn't have his misunderstanding or his lack of information to say that the intervener then can and cannot under that section overturn the voluntary knowledge of the paternity and i just don't think has rods i don't think that he could establish his rights superior you can say you has rights and he yeah i notice that he he objects and he says that the existence of the respondent as a legal we were surprised that people think you but i know of no reason that they didn't file a notice of appeal i believe that's failed and beyond that the issue of the child support guidelines there's some implication interveners brief that the court was prejudiced and that that reflected itself in the child support and i think a close examination of the record does not support that the interven i've paid thirteen thousand dollars in insurance fees to my turn i've also paid more in an amount i don't remember i also know i know more and then amount i don't remember but i plan to pay those and then subsequently supported by the record supported by the testimony and was reasonable and should be  fees and things like that during that that gap from from fed your fourteenth of eleven until march twentieth twelve litigation it was filed in the few thousand that it was attached to our position in irving our paris petition and our she dashed one for one we're both attached to our position i think yes the rules are vention you have to show what
outskirts of a small city  interpretation i think is supported by the language of the statute but all you know by now i think it's also important to know th will come to you suggested some difference you know we should apply but isn't this a noble review
all the word standing is not mentioned because i think the trial judge indicated that as well and he doesn't it wasn't the position of the fans always that they were not challenging standing but the insufficiency of the response to that your honor is that we don't have to prove every step of the chain and that's why we give the present fish a case on the mortgage foreclosure law you just have to establish which we did we have a copy the no copy of the mortgage we allege the frankly but we didn't need to give the court the all record assignments they're all in the court in these offices they're all there they go from search fish they're all there and why they work produced previously that i have to assume that the other thing that i think is important is you know we're going back and forth about what's fair with just what's not on this order but i think it's also interesting that this case of a penny for quite some time and i've already been through why i put in my my understanding
won and as i'm sitting here listening to the arguments it could be also that this decision should be reversed because it is contrary to a law that perhaps you just issue and it seems that everyone has spoken about this every thirty minutes for twelve hours but that's all that he did and that's all that he ever knew based on the time of this test and what he also testified to various things that he thought that would be important in determining whether there's a c information which even calls on paucity of knowledge he still testified in his opinion that there might or could be a contribution factor from the work activities to his carpal tunnel syndrome  as the court is aware of barry resolving conflicts in the evidence stronger francis from the testimony and determine the credibility of witnesses and the way to be given their testimony of the matters within the province of the industrial complex clearly the arbitrator the commissioner juggling considered the testimony
this was ye kinds of stock purchase plans there are all kinds of ways they don't have to be original plans much saying wins one is you're not that's not even relevant to my current question or point so if the employers an could as well cover that situation as it does cover and rips a call to action that's what they claim it seems to mean that we're in a come on and make back home i think it's a problem any way i understand what i mean and i'm saying we should have been shareholders and they're even saying well we think we close our shareholders because the plan gave us entitled to this but the risk of preemption should not depend officially under the securities law you have to look at all the facts and under these facts they're saying there was an employee benefit plans a penalty or something under that plan i didn't get it and now here is what i understand to be the reasons why you didn't get it in there are internal machinations dissipated what are they going to manufacture a new shares and give them to these people they have to dilute all the other shareholders stock our public policy i'd like to touch on have very briefly in the public policy
interests we'll be continuing to move with your seriousness about the fact that you get something down the road that may not be all that helpful and you can never contested doesn't seem to matter much if you go to the side right here right now you're right  is premature to even address that issue perhaps there is a proceeding immigration where it would be equitable he also has other grounds so family unity there are here it wasn't the case and the fact is that you could also look at he would be he was supposed to be interviewed with her indicated that they were separated after that there was another interview he indicated ga we can't make that interview this time even though they're told each and every time you can't be interviewed unless you have your spouse's identification to prove it's hair this time they came for the interview they were turned away because she had no identification documents so take each of these facts individually and look at them they look at us that they can be explained away but when you look at the entire picture it's all indicative of fraud  thank you ok right thank you
february twenty third sorry there were twenty second journalist who were when he was talking about this case with her father and he was giving her a lot of information about the fact that it come out in the newspapers that he already knew considered were out of the buildings they wouldn't know what happened the next day journey seven comes in and talks to the whole jury and the alternate saying that she was going to be on the jury now people are asking her how we how do you know that has i believe his he didn't testify but i know the issue about being shot was in the videotape and that was excluded and the one of the conditions was i thought that she said in her letter that jurors number five and seven reported to all of the jurist that the defendant had been previously around yes it was getting that information that the that the co the specificity of you know it's not speculation she gave specific she told she told the court that they said this they said she had been arrested and she has qualifying language which she talked about  for themselves and i think that's important on here and i would ask the question if they didn't get this information from the newspapers why are they why were they coming to this conclusion you know there was nothing submitted to him during the
following coverage is intended to be a mechanism for ascertainment of the truth here the plaintiff the not have an opportunity to ascertain the truth for the benefit of trial or of negotiations in another themselves is not enough st of all he's right but there are cases we cite and i can listen for you that state that when it's unclear exactly what is necessary to situation because then the family company from london i'm thinking well i'm not going to do anything because the stench is going to go on indefinitely so you're causing maybe the country to say ok i'm not going do any going on between the parties into two thousand and sixteen we have correspondents indicates that the negotiation completely broke down by the fall of two thousand and fifteen so wasn't th this just another point this is an underground system with involving a small and when there are widespread system failures in water around water's getting into this system that shouldn't be happening in the village for the parties on notice their white said bread system failures the villagers didn't know exactly the full nature and extent of the problems because they were very underground there was enough for investigation by the parties and the village
were toilet paper forms and the ten i was looking for patients were personal comfort was conducted off the employer's premises all the personal comfort cases seem to just say it's personal comfort has it qualitatively different number the general public using the bathroom
rate we contend that they should have been able to give him a successful percentage rate performs them twice and i guess i'm not entirely really clear what you're saying is is is your complaint that they used numbers that all o over i think a three year where they were to let special accoutrement plans and people working with him giving training it's not like he was in regular work or he came in one day and said you haven't been producing enough you're out of here i mean there was a constant cases there and you know we don't know what happened when he just lost track of the cases whether he was embarrassed that you know he wasn't there but he couldn't do the job and he just he just couldn't again they discredit that mr olsen is performing at a lower rate than what he is required to perform in the states sixty one percent specifically and they save as the basis for the b s that he is receiving or if he is it's not until they actually decide to remove mr olson where they indicate some level that mr austin was supposed to attain or to keep his job and there they say they indicate an eight percent  state fire any more for management to consider performance success to one of the o p s plan you must demonstrate consistent sustained improvement at an acceptable level although you had a few weeks with an appropriate eighty percent average you did
best interests of the children standard i mean if this when they chant she made some comments on the record like well i'm going to imply that relocation statute because  analysis that this relocation statute is a true and no it's not true relocation statute is the best interest of the child as one of the factors that the court  to them this tennessee school district one child at least bought that for her educational opportunities were better in addition to her extracurricular could cause the older child who wants to going on this is this petition understand that i'm not sure we can go as far as you want us to go that's why i'm asking what relief you want right now there's just an injunction in place that but the fact now that the children have lived in tennessee probably for how many months for more than six months at this writing on earth as the trial court or lose jurisdiction six i don't believe that it's appropriate at this juncture in the trial for percy this really is an injunction under which there is permissive there is a right to a permissive appeal ok my question to you is and i want to this is really a let's let's forgive the jurisdiction for a moment because i'm going to ask you something if somebody files a leading under the wrong issuing an injunction you have to have a complaint it has to say these are the four things that we see order has to be very specific none of that happened here and yet the judge  but there was no violation of this statute or see julie as she ran under a different section so she's trying to kind of she's trying to correct what she knows was a mistake originally which she has  go i mean these are just things that will come out later that you know we i'm not saying it's true or not true but there is evidence in the record that this just wasn't an overnight kind of mind i mean we actually are and also cuts both ways because there's also evidence in the record that he did not know that she was leaving and that's why i say it will be flushed out or really should certainly text messages from the father to the kids about you know her cut off or whatever so there's a lot yet to be determin even come close to the illinois injunctive relief act requirements and yet we get that we get to a motion to reconsider not even with the order but it's the motion to reconsider we're in our courts as well proceeding the natural for should be given the discretion and granted the ability to make that decision because after all she is in the seat down there and what's most important in this case are the children i had with her first me to think that we're talking about
you know see how this works out all right sit dare to trouble down and start case he often waits until the victim is not looking and then makes his move scaring them and causing them to scream followed by this this ghost must be stopped and that's where our two ghost hunters come in frons peterson has been hunting ghosts for thirty seven years i will my name is i have been hunting goals for over thirty five years so i'll just yeah i have captured in excess of sea hundred ghosts including the most famous bunchy of boston his counterpart is his nephew landers that doesn't know anything about ghosts well i don't i don't know anything about ghosts i just kind of follow my uncle around because he's kind of weird these two will team up and an attempt to capture the stairway goes there will get a number of traps that appeal to the ghost the first trap dressing as a female goes well the first attempt to get the ghost in really worked  interest in wanting to be captured they have finally done it you no longer need to worry about a great guy you know what he's going to be the party he is so yeah i heard it's another rumor that the hallway goes on and maybe scare people there but this former song oh yeah you know the first sighting
not you know
take we're going to take it we're trying today show since you like not cool at all we're going to try to make you cooler problem and maybe help you out with a little giddy up here and maybe you know i said yes and we had some people make some videos ok so i mean you can branch off other moves from this one ok yeah you can do almost anything that's like the start that's your base of the whole i'm almost my nurse you know and i mean if you're doing this doing guys mountain top secret all these things will probably take i mean like i said slow process it might be ten years before you get a date ten years yeah really could be ten years but you know whether i can wait yeah so i mean that's  finally be for ten years i hope so i hope so too and i want to see eighty five years old and alone well in ten years i'd only be twenty so i know i'm just saying that i mean maybe after ten years i just go to twenty years and thirty
on the money you're not quite sure where the money actually the money there's a disputed with regard to the conversion you're not sure where that money went broke a moment someplace but then later on that came from his personal some personal and that which may or may not have some of the other funds you have no idea nobody has any idea of that and then the second amount would be with the allegation about attorney's  but at that point they would send notice to tell you something you already kn proposition that o priority over every other
monday for the remaining piece of improvements that need to be done today to complete the hidden plan with the developers up on money it was confiscated and we had ten bids they were bottom up and were competitive the top obviously were kind of not possible bids but the low bidder was random contracting we've never worked with them so i did a little homework there a local company incorporated about twenty years ago i got very good references on their work we did submit a big bond and i do believe they're qualified to do the work i would recommend that we feel we were the bid to them for thirty nine thousand and fifty dollars up contracting their discussion but i do have a question if the eighty three hundred dollars if the money left in that top line is available would there be a discussion with  homeowners association about what they would prefer that money be used for as opposed to the sidewalk is there a potential that that could be directed towards the gating they say issue with the land i'm not sure what you but i was just thinking if they're going to be faced with this issue with their b m but that be a better use of it i know the sidewalks definitely an improvement but i given that it was land and it was the commonly and i didn't know it that qualified for the public as far as spending the extra money in the townships going to have to pay that say three hundred dollars can the scope of the work be reduced said it meets the number that we have left in the  underlying zoning that's in place on these properties will stay in place the conservation residential mixed residential districts are potential development options overlaid over the underlying zoning so you know there are several properties of large undeveloped properties that peter's that are targeted based on the campaign for these two districts there are lots of developers  potential development sitting in weeding for these ordinances to be in place to be advertised for public hearing and we're hopeful that some time here in september we will have been in a
of this day let us pray for your father this time of joyous celebration there are issues that need to be handled and taken care of some can be done very easily  into our evaluation of the chief and i like to thank the chief in the staff for the past years of being able to work with them closely and you know we agreed to disagree but there was a lot more agreements and disagreements and i officers attend specialized training to be able to speak and present awareness presentation and conduct preparedness exercises for our community specific to active shooter and terrorist types of incidences now these programs are being run by personnel that was involved and already assigned to various different sections in the in the department therefore you know having to do it on a part time basis because they're already had their own armory duties now these programs dealt with two  issues in our community that needed to be managed on a full time basis and it was the vision of the chief to be able to create in the core unit to be able to provide these services including the taking of proactive approach in addressing these important have the presentation exercise with d presentation it's a forty five minute presentation which we take the department of homeland security with their red tape and concept we educate these individuals that at the beginning we have three scenarios and it tends to kind of just to practice their procedures and their policies as well as the department of homeland security have a right so they can go in and they can react in these situations hence the creation of the corps you and so you may ask what this army corps is critical all reach and response through education so we didn't name the unit after the acronym but rather be named the unit after the word corps now corps for all of us assurance of that kind of stuff so it's still in the works i can't really comment much about it
injury he decided that his story was not telling the decided that his credibility was shot it's to be it's it's not it's not it's not illegal it's not compelling
with reference to five zero one point one does not mean that it applies in the present case it only means that a driver who think involved in the first one to motor vehicle accident and has been deemed to have given consent to chemical testing under section five or one point you know cafeteria worker and hospital we have to draw a line and i think that was the tenet of saying these pacific people may do so because they have at least a minimal training so you can respect the privacy and respect leaves you know the person
wasn't sure if i was going to find would appeal but the court take issue before the court on that day your honor was classification do you agree that it is staying with his point and i find failing to give proper notice then intention to appeal and getting an no order back council has to ask for council they waive back to state court and as a practical matter even though the district court did not write a decision on this it's still in the docket it's publicly available that the district were held that all of these