consequences of cancellation of her sister grant of asylum when the person is granted asylum they wait one year and then they file for adjustment of status they file a forty five was so terrible and the slightest suspicion gave rise to torture which is in fact what happened the slightest suspicious activity and this was not very egregious activity it wasn't like he was leading a demonstration or protesting in any kind of public forum he knew the score in uganda he knew that if he was too vocal he would really probably get killed so he kept things rather muted only they had this charitable meeting in the restaurant to help people who are in trouble you know help them with their rent medical whatever came up so that's why it isn't exactly a political opinion that he demonstrated rather  continued the family tradition not in terms of government participation but in terms of his participation in a charitable organization you know he refrained from that he definitely i expressing his political opinion to this day he refrains from expressing his political opinion he only expresses his terror he's fear of the government in uganda he doesn't actually say this one is right that's one that one is wrong or what he actually thinks in terms of the political strategy which should happen in his country or any kind of path he just wanted to get away because he was afraid mainly because of what happened to his father and the two instances of torture which indicated not specifically we do believe we do renew our request again for reading and today we believe that it's improper in light of the court's decision and i'll cry as which the board didn't have the benefit of  do not believe so because the court if it remains i have ever heard of it can we imagine just a portion of a case and keeping another portion but it wouldn't necessarily if it goes back to the board the board then would be able to reopen for all purposes and in fact we've also asked for early man so that the the board could reconsider its findings with regard to asylum status making more considering i don't remember that it's in saying that specifically what i mean is that when it is affirmed it said we find that the i j a correctly concluded that it is inadequate to meet his testimony in adequate to me or persons that the government were controlling or would act we asked to torture i guess there was no finding that it was going to be on behalf of the government that there would be torture so on that basis then that alone could be enough to show that there's no cat protection so the on account of necessarily finding that wouldn't that wouldn't be would have wasn't wasn't necessarily dressed that doesn't necessarily need to be in th immigration judge it was quite clearly stated that petitioners didn't have a political opinion and that he was that he in fact was not politically active that any opinion that may have been imputed or any assertion i think is that the prohibition was against millions outside in the square when ever so this was a meeting in have friends and acquaintances in the restaurant so it could hardly be considered to be well he did say that it was open to all and that they spread the word through it was through word of mouth that the meetings meeting times and and the place were  him they were trying to get him to state that he was involved in politics and they were right and he does say that they were asking him about that that is true doesn't seem to be any other real reason for them torturing him unless they were concerned for his possibly being involved in the anti government activity well that that is part that's possible conclusion however it's not clear from the record that that is in fact what they were doing but rather arresting him that may have been their reasoning for it so so again we were just again renew our requests for being the end of this case both both was regard to the repeat brain issue and that has persecution was better now in fact country reports indicate that torture is still going on in uganda and that civilians are regularly tortured in prisons and by the vicious and uganda and during the course of the hearing the respondent was asked do you have any kind of fear of returning and he said yes he said that the policies have never changed and in fact most most seventy is still in power and the police chief is still in power so the very same people who  who caused his father's great harm and his eventual death and cause bodily and great psychological harm to mr veteran are still in power and therefore it can definitely be inferred that he would suffer a future persecution and  during the course of the interrogation as to his political opinion which definitely brings him into the cat for marina but i think in this case it would be better to grant a