do it with a turban in other words forget about your religion and conform to the rest of society now the mother had every every every reason to fear for the life of her son at the very least and that would  tell a mother to remove her son's turban and cut his hair that i think is enough to instill fear in any mother persecution on account of her seek faith in brazil because substantial evidence in the record supports immigration judges denial of relief and it's not hell a contrary decision we asked the court to deny the petition for a view chanda failed to satisfy her burden of proof to show that she is a refugee she claims to suffer past persecution have a well founded fear of future persecution by the federal police in brazil on account of her face i'd like to address the central issue in this case which is whether the harassment suffered by mr shand in brazil while unfortunate whether or not it rises to the level of persecution required to establish her eligibility for brazil went to the federal police office they refused to accept his photos because he was wearing a turban and there was a federal police directive that requires individuals to have a beer had in their photos she in the her husband were upset by by having to buy him being required to remove his turban and which she didn't and they talked to a news reporter who published an article in the paper that later on about the incident she then testified that in one nine hundred eighty eight a few years later she again went back to the federal police office again seeking and identity card her husband and her were initially admitted to the building on her husband left the building for a drink of water and when he returned close to the closing time of the building he was denied re entry and a scene ensued with him and the police officers at the she described simply do not rise to the level of persecution do not make her eligible for asylum with respect to the question on the disappearance of the husband there is absolutely no evidence in the record to support  her belief that her husband was abducted by the by the police in fact the evidence is to the contrary frankly because the two police officers who saw her for years after her husband disappeared asked whether she w for years afterwards police officers would remember that there was an individual who didn't take his turban off that really suggest that they thought he was alive if they knew that much generally in the country you might have some reason to fear that they were going to be asked you but your honor certainly one might have a fear at the question is whether that's a reasonable t local police officers and the country reports indicate that they're they do sort of administrative type things like running this identity card program the country reports now indicate that they're feared i th she been talking about she talked about in her in her asylum application are of a different art or different office i mean they're they're probably going to allegorize to be talking about our local police versus federal law enforcement agents these these individuals were concerned with her only because of the identity card issue there's no indication that these are local police officers who might engage in in ro and when you look at the objective the objective part of the when you look at the fact that the police in brazil there is widespread corruption there's evidence that