statutory authority to problem the rule of three thirty and intuition just association orders affecting sales agent did the poor and also have jurisdiction to consider the remainder emphasized that the state's attorney was now in that case asking for a review of any commission order and it is now trying to circumvent the requirements of the a complaint parties to seek relief and that recognizing the exhaustion of the situation allows the agency to utilize its expertise and to make the fact fi and when it dissociation order is sent what's the actual trigger or what was the trigger in this case was it just the fact that they found out that mr gra a charge and that they had a file i mean those were those were two issues that you know excel is out there receiving services from family amusements mr grant is the sole shareholder video gaming there would have been more with riverboat gambling and riverboat gambling involves a much more limited number of sites and locations so you don't really they were determined well the poor who stole those not license but the word decided well at least we should require the licensees to provide some information about their sales agents and if there's some serious problem relating to character integrity and so forth then we should be able to order economic disassociati is another reason i think to require exhaustive it is on this is a matter in which the agencies expertise would be relevant the agency of course has expertise in matters that are related to gaming and one of the is would be matters that might affect public confidence even arrest in a matter of like this is something middle east has the potential to have an impact on public confidence in gaming and so i think the best way to look at this case is to kind of create again to work for arguments because i think there are jurisdictional issues that we can talk about which with each of them and i think that if you indicated in talking to pounce council there might be some having to exhaust impose a tax and by its own rules he couldn't do the course of no you can't do that in the same here you are trying to impose a rule the new order did no one can abide by i mean here's the problem  not know that family inducements in exile had contracts separate and apart from gaming and yet it appears they did not they should have an opportunity to criminal case  i don't know how that will end up but that's the status on the council about that and should be gaining board make a determination as to whether or not you your argument that these contracts are unrelated that's just a statement we don't know that we don't have a record of fully the gold record the truck court didn't have a fully developed reference to how the relationship that led to these other conflicts was developed i mean there are all kinds of public policy issues that might be go through the app process if you have gone through their process and you can state eating records the reason good reason to now for this court to consider we consider if you have a trial or if you have some action and you do agree in motion to reconsider so that the trial fourteen correct a problem and what you've read directly to us we probably say you didn't give him a chance to correct it and we'll send it back anyway three thirty a day would be geared more poorly requiring a light sensi at all times to be able to economically disassociate from persons with significant control if need be