the ages of thirteen and seventeen regardless of whether the person and under the age of seventeen confronted the activity so because most records of ours girlfriend was under seventeen their consensual sexual relationship is considered question mr karr in a friendly manner but again that's the crux of the argument in this case is that their friendliness and their personal relationship with mr kolchak are added to and his girlfriend were peers he was older than her absolutely but they were peers they were both high school students they had banged in a romantic relationship and then handstands as teenagers often do they were these i would argue that it's a traditionally consensual act and that she she wanted to have facts she chose to engage and that's it i agree that it's not  technically is to buy i got this all of this was brought about by the girlfriend's parents they were the ones who informed the police and  if if the male is under the age of seventeen because the statute doesn't read it protects all females or eight it's all it can like as such activities are persons under the age of thirteen and seventeen so people who have murdered someone and not necessarily feel like they did something wrong but in this case again this isn't an act which is inherently bad he was a teenager a high school teenager who had sex with his girlfriend and then he's talking to these man whom he know outside of their roles as police police officers who downplayed the importance and the seriousness of what was happening when he officers doing interrogating and doing the misleading have a host person on a personal relationship with the person that they're interrogating and the illinois supreme court has said that this isn't an additional factor you considered and police was a friend of the the defendant being interrogated and spoke with him briefly but didn't really participate in the interrogation and so that luis from court did find that the confession in that case was voluntary would signal heart because they had this personal relationship and so think they were coming to get some sort of statement about his relationship and again well enough that might signal to him that something that he might be in trouble again in this case years would have been allayed by the fact that he was being questioned by men who you trust that you downplayed the seriousness of what was going on and so i got all of these factors create a circumstance where th yes he was he asked he has a popular he has to register as a sex offender for ten years or not might but he has to register a minimum for ten years as your honour's know sometimes it's i mean the burdens that are placed on people who have to register are immense and that it does expose him to further criminal what does that raise in your mind if you just want to take and have a friendly conversation with the it's just if you're not doing something in the line of police work well that's sort of contrary to a lot of arguments made by the prosecutor are situations where in a lot of times a lot of times ghar situations where facts are presented and police really do just want to find out what's going on but don't necessarily have this person as a target and they want to find out what how can you separate down that they are necessarily investigating him for one of them or she and this is in this particular case the defendant really not been arrested at this point they were just bring him down because they had an allegation as well as the fact that because the one of the officers coached baseball that all factors that all interest ensue but when we look at when we look at his decision is protected by the thetan based on her age regardless that is sad that is not something that i don't think the police have to take and i don't think they have to think and say hey by the way you know there's this thing called statutory rape i don't think they have to take and tell him that in order for him before the other side question for him to make up his mind if question is at the time he decided to speak to police did he do that the the statements in this case for voluntary and my response that is they absolutely should play into whether or not this was volunteered because the it's part of the circumstances the task for determining whether or not could have told him from the beginning because they have this this this personal relationship that this isn't this is serious we've got we got a call from the girl's parents you might be in some trouble here in the position of profs and you officer testified that they were friends again that all all of this needs to be taken on with please into what happened here