manifested the credible evidence that was admitted at this time of the trial support service of the commission's decision we find at the conclusion that mr lance condition as of the date of hearing that it was clearly a the take a look at the videotape actually and look at that in conjunction with you know if you're going to i don't know if you have the opportunity to review the surveillance video or not but actually the surveillance video i think you take a life time line a look at the time general and ibuprofen as she continues to treat dr kim actually performed an injection into her knee on july first of two thousand and nine he noted that the injection actually made her knee feel a little better when he saw her any positive adult science when he saw her in december of two thousand and nine and when she goes to see dr oak and he specifically notes that she had no positive waddell science when he saw her in january of two thousand and ten so he did but he did that just as she did say that he thought that she was just perhaps magnifying her symptoms but he didn't say that she did not have symptoms and when she goes back to see dr sushi in two thousand and ten dr seuss at that time actually found that he thought that she had and she probably should go back and have some additional diagnostic studies done he didn't attribute that necessarily to her work and sure that she had an april two thousand and nine but he also did indicate that she wasn't important here because all of her treatment is about subjective pain complaints and i appreciate counsel talk about her low back in her ridiculous but the but they did to me m g which was normal and honestly when she got to dr oaken the only thing she was really diagnosed with was chronic pain and if you read the decision the commission simply didn't believe her she was asked on cross examination specifically about her abilities  to garden to been and to we need to care for her grandchildren she denied all of that she said she was in well over pain she couldn't do any of those function showing that she's bending that she's guarding that she's weaving that she's carrying her child your grandchild and that the the arbitrator and then the commission took specific note of that they just said in their decision she her pain is really really out of proportion with any of the objective testing that to see if she said the same thing said it's symptomatic and if occasion her pain is there's nothing objective we can't finding there's nothing wrong with her basically and dr oking does carry a different opinion i mean that there's no question about it but his entire opinion is based upon her subjective complaints regarding her pain and the x i think she actually when she went and saw a doctor gave a very specific history saying that she was  she was unable to do any housecleaning act or outdoor activities shopping gardening exercising a you know he she spoke she specifically told all of that to architecture ok and then obviously says the same thing at trial and in that surveillance video so something very different and that's really what the arbitrator in the commission saw and i will tell you they didn't make a specific credibility finding but it was clear from their decision they didn't believe or i mean they just said her subjective with regard to the with regard to the testimony as to whether she was able to bend over and do the gardening and various things like that they were asking her that question in two thousand and eleven and what her testimony with the records actually reflect was that later videotape that was i think day four of the surveillance that they had and interesting lee four days eight hours a day they come up with twenty six minutes worth of video of this lady and but when they do do the video it's march