MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
well today is sunday july twenty nin have to respond on that case would phyllis arguing is phyllis arguing that they never should have allowed the guardianship to be entered his order never should have allowed the guardianship to be told what happened was nancy bradburn johnson and jennifer barsky had a hearing during the time period that the court house was closed because it was snowing  that hearing that absolutely never should have been held and then a few days later the other guardian who had been nominated to be the appointed guardian did even withdrawn and then for some reason against morgan was in or does the guardian there's absolutely nothing in the record that was beforehand put in the record so that dance could be appointed nothing was in the record at all and then trial and he was never allowed to us object to the guardianship proceeding in the first place so it's very very nice that  attorney in that case now in the court of appeals has filed an appeal and is filed an objection to the guardianship so i'm really really glad i'm sitting out here i'm waiting to be able to go to the picnic it's very very nice sunny day is arguing that they should have allowed avis to be the guardian because that was with the husband wanted now that they were both denied access to court and this is trying to get justice for her husband robert
i ended up coming to mina man because i knew i wanted to work with my hands and i knew i wanted to come true come in the middle man made sense for me because it gave me the opportunity to learn more about marine biology and environmental science i chose to come to minimax because of the shops i knew i liked biotech and engineering and it was unsure which one i was able to choose and i love my choice ever since i chose me and because i wanted to do cosmetology i chose to come to minimum because i am hands on and chose minutemen because i saw the minutemen help you prepare for the future it's like every other school except we have one different class set of a study we have a trade for the whole day for one week every two weeks we get to learn and use later in life it really feels like you're stepping into the real world it feels like after you spend your weekend academics you step into a working world you get to choose the field you want to go and so it's it's interesting and every day is interesting and every hour of every day in shop which is interesting  recently worked with a organism called the pico lie which everybody has and our gut and we treated it with a very specific enzyme called pico enzyme which basically is a system of genetic modification where we caused these single celled organisms that we grow in our lab every week to become luminescent it was it was really cool we'll go to different streams and test the quality of the water and being able to learn stuff outside and doing it actually in the field as opposed to just hearing about it in the cost room i'm designing maple baseball bat that doesn't i'm sponsoring when the ball hits the weak spot is really cool because i mean something that could actually be put into effect today i love cars there's something about tightening a bolt that really motivates me to get the job done things that people can look at and use for purpose art i create art the one thing that i enjoy the most is when i'm all done and the client gets out of my chair and they have the biggest smile on their face that puts a smile on my face as they walk out the door knowing that i accomplished most of us do and they enjoyed what i'd done and they'll come  and anywhere what you want to see yourself do they will help you get to that point the kids in my shop are like my family when you spend four years of people you can get really close so i know like if i ever need anything they always be loyal to you and they will help you with whatever you need next year i plan to go to the university of new england and double major and environmental science and marine science i plan to apply to several colleges including u doesn't mean that we don't get the same education as other people we get just as much and more we get all of the academics that you will burn at a regular high school and the addition and the career major the to choose every day something
submission and then made another motion on friday to adjourn the argument this court denied that motion and he and specifically said he should either indicate that he would arrive now come to oral argument and notify me and he notified me friday afternoon that he would be coming in that he was happy to argue you notified the court as well we were expecting him best notwithstanding he is not here at the moment i am happy to answer any questions about the dark corners of the
clear defendants will be held to that choice to litigate on the merits that is the only evidence required by this court to find that their conduct was tactical and find waiver will cause the hope to sort out the cases that obviously there's a dividing line the past year here is not one where you could use the state of technical advantage because there is just thomas points out the judge raises the issue would you comment on whether you think that where does that and why was there an advantage here what was the advantage there are a bunch that i can speculate on i don't know exactly here in this case in this case i mean that they get the benefit of all the judgment on the pleading the time you certainly made your side well thank you very much we'll hear from the government situations courts should find waiver i think the key point judge thomas said the wrinkle in this case is that the court raised the issue of spontaneous and that's important for a couple different reasons first to admit to the one of the primary purposes of the waiver doctrine is to basically state judicial resources that there would be no say the beautiful resources here in the district court had to deal with this case again we're talking about  allegations of violations going back in two thousand and one in two thousand and five and therefore would submit to the court that there was no waiver here but that's not the other way in this case because the ways to judicial resources was the fact that the state litigated this set out the constitutionality of it i think it was in two thousand and ten when this court first held in holly that monetary damages are not available against prison officials in their individual in their official this goes back to  to try to address what is really valid under section five of the fourteenth amendment congress made clear in the statutory language that it didn't want to use that section five powers and kevin whole history of religious represent the state and that is the only job that they have and the routinely asserts armenian cases on behalf of the california department of corrections and it is somewhat incredible to think that they inadvertently didn't apply didn't assert this defense the record shows that their conduct over the course of four and a half years was to extensively litigate this on the merits they push their qualified and your arguments never once raising  work product and in the trying to client relationship and so i think that that is part of the reason why in this court johnson recognized that you were gee it's deemed tactical because it is a question of how you would prove that i mean the question we really
as well as mootness the initial challenge was at the stage the initial challenge was to a character and fitness committee recommendation that mr grant's d not be admitted so that claim is now because the character and fitness committee recommendation is no longer applicable five mont supreme court has ruled so the only challenge that was before the district court was to the committee recommendation which is now that we're seeking to clear a torrent injunctive relief so i'm not sure that's me but i think that's why i thought that  your primary argument now that the vermont supreme court has ruled was race i agree that residue to cut it would apply and that is an argument that we rely on the district court now with mr cranstoun saw to challenge the vermont supreme court ruling would be required by the full faith and credit clause to apply rescue to carter principles as a vermont state court would so so to the extent that the case is not moot and that he sought a declaration that the admissions process is unconstitutional if we were to also wanted to briefly address two statements in the reply brief that are inaccurate the first is that vermont amended its rules in two thousand and thirteen to remove a hearing option and did not replace it with anything equivalent that is based on what purports to be a quote from an old version of roll eight of the vermont rules for admission to the bar the quoted language does not appear in the two thousand and twelve version of relate where mr gunson indicates that it appears that's not because hearings unavailable they've been available at all relevant times in vermont they were just addressed and roll eleven parts from two thousand and twelve two thousand and sixteen the rules were sense reorganized and they're now addressed in rule seventeen but the point i wanted to clarify is that hearings have been available at all times and were not removed in two thousand and twelve the second point i wanted to briefly address is mr gunson suggests that the brooks albertson case a district court case we cite held that constitutional challenges to state bar rules are not subject to younger abstention that's also not accurate markson applied younger to abstain from considering challenges relating to ongoing state character and fitness proceedings the issue in burke's albertson was that the applicant had applied for leave to sit for the bar he was denied permission to sit on the basis of character and fitness concerns and he then brought a federal case in which he brought three categories of claims the first related to the character and fitness proceedings and they were subject to younger abstention and dismissed on that basis the other two related to an internship program and two testing requirements that were not at issue in the ongoing state proceedings because he was not allowed to sit for the test at all so younger applied in brooks along the exact same grounds that the district court correctly applied it below and we would ask that the court affirmed the judgment of the district
circumstances of the case which were not in dispute the appellant also raises or addresses issues of th amendment constitutional violations as well as a claim for unreasonable search and the entry into the home neither of which issues were claimed or addressed at the trial level in fact the complaint in this matter simply alleged violation of th amendment
far greater and on usenet events that are absolutely central to your client's claim of asylum you code you carry they don't in essence with tangential issues and minor discrepancies in time but three different dates on which he was arrested in china and those those dates are not are not close to one another ok that's point one in point two testified that when the chinese police arrested including they want to know so much that they actually physically you know beat him so we're not we're not talking about minor points you know on our or things that might just slipped your mind i can't but we don't we don't have to know what was in his mind right we don't have we have a record where we can compare the testimony with the written outward cation and we see at least with the two examples you know i just gave you we see pretty serious pretty material differences our individual should be given the benefit of the doubt are you saying that the immigration judge misapplied the law apply the wrong burden of proof i don't yet corroborative evidence st sent out a letter from his wife and i mean what happened to him in china and also not only that he had two letters from individuals married yet she was converted to the relation in south korea let me ask you a question about that ok what is the record show regarding whether she made the trip i know they weren't married your you've been clear on that point  ok what is the record show though about whether she made the trip with him to south korea did she go with him no i don't is i don't know what is that in the record and if so where is that in the record no i don't the changing of his narratives the dates for these very important events i think as i did noted and but now it's hard to tell what happened whatsoever because every step of the way there inconsistency is in contradiction so by the fact that  than any other questions for me
last case united states for sure sanders it please the court i'm peter henderson on behalf of calvin sanders we've got three meant that there was an error here and i'd ask the court to accept that agreement i think the only question is what the remedy  take a look at both the term of imprisonment and the term of supervised release and so when you have just one you have to worry about the other the other reason i think the fourth circuit addressed this exact issue where felony was so the last thing that i would note that i did not put in the brief is i think that a review of the recent sing transcript does show a little bit of of confusion in terms of what the proper role of this thompson remained was i know that this court has addressed that issue recently but what mr sanders was trying to tell the court in the court eventually came around to the idea was yes in fact you can reconsider all these things you can take into consideration what i've done since the original sentencing but there was a lot of confusion about that obviously a lot of these things that the thompson supervised release case was about was about giving notice which was given in this case but also orally imposing the conditions justifying the conditions and those were sort of alighted they were incorporated by reference but it really what there's a lot of deference t just curious how you got away with this you know that that's exactly my understanding is there and you presented these claims to the unemployment and without knowing they were funny corporations who you had on not too long ago where the who just a i'm intrigued by counsel's total that the court could amend the judgment under i guess rule thirty six i believe there is already for this court being able to do that kind of wish it had been proposed before it all came here and because it's very clear that he softening or mitigating the supervised release conditions did not affect judge that it was view of the appropriate term of you know prison  term there may be cases where there is an interplay or a possible interplay between the prison sentence and surprised at least term where it's appropriate even perhaps a third time to send it back but in this case the government's and that's that would be a waste of time so we would ask either that you remand the case with instructions to redetermine supervised release term or correct the judgment on the other sex i'm happy to answer any questions you have about do you think there of conclusion in my brief i say that this error went unnoticed by everyone actually probation department did not error in this case the three sentences three so my office share some of the blame the
i just want the court to know that mr weaver says there's some period of time he doesn't remember and then the trial judge or he he senses this week for maximum term for attempted murder himself acknowledged that he was almost certain evaluated and certainly and again we don't know alcohol steroids he's a whole taken up will post the things that we don't know what interaction has with his fear of the dark i know it sounds kids are afraid of the dark but it is natural phobia this mother's up of touched by the sentencing hearing that he had this problem as a child all the way up until an adult that he would freak out when he would wake up and like to be out screaming at the top of his lungs we don't know what investigation council veered or didn't do we don't know if and how he decided perhaps an investigation was unnecessary it can be reasonable judgement and effective assistance  regarding anything concerning the finance passports in pencil or that nothing shows what went on between the defendant and his attorney to leave the attorney not to seek a psychiatric examination and to leave the attorney not to further investigate the defendant's mental history if it needed further investigation we just don't know the record from the motion to withdraw to what he does show that i said four to five meetings with the defendant other times in court nothing there is led him to believe the defendant to be insane if he has to file nothing in the record nothing in the record indicates an exam would have found the defendant legally insane nothing in the record indicates that as a result of a mental disease or defect i'm just stating the standard here as i said easily construed speaking figuratively or even break being a violent drunk argument you turned it to an insanity defense the other part of the record we have from the hearing on the motion to withdraw the guilty plea the defendant said and that's true but again we again that can't be determined here because the lawyer says he met with him for five times most others and nothing in what he said led him to believe and insanity defense should be presented we've got the defendant statements from the record that have been iterated reiterated here but we don't know everything that went on between the defendant and his lawyer we don't know what else we have here is in essence the fear of the dark coupled with you know history a criminal history of violence several domestic batteries and violence and five brazen in his statement to the cops he somebody not somebody insane just because the add in the factor of if the phobia fear of the dark think he was insane basically he understood what i was saying to participate in his defense but that's not the standard that's whether he's the pretrial question here is whether he was the same at the time of the offense whether he had the state of mind
no one got to where they were without walls along the way because no matter how good your idea how much work you're willing to put into it there are always going to you the only one holding you back is yourself in any brick walls it comes your way you just asked to ask yourself are you willing to get past the wall or are you going to let it stop you because these brick walls they exist for one  brick wall after brick wall it all comes down to how you are willing to see your idea and your endeavor through to the end but in reality it's all you have a choice every single day with what you're going to do with your one who you're going to spend it with where you're going to spend your money but if you just go out and do with your passion out what you believe you're going to be amazed how far it's com
stonybrook scary child contains probably the largest collection of america's horse drawn vehicles american carriage manufacturing began about seventeen forty but there weren't many places to go when roads result that you did better by horse philadelphia was the early detroit of the carriage business and as highways and geography improved it appeared that ours was to be a nation on wheel another springs supporter the concord coaches three thousand of which helped link a growing nation the ninety's saw carriage making a sixty seven million dollar industry but its days were numbered and horse and buggy day boards and quaintly costume drivers of those ancient chariot carefully preserved by old car lovers make a strange sight on the highway there was another day when the same cars then brand new were strange sights too all but a few of the early model cars are forgotten today twenty five hundred names once flew proudly out was a popular use of motoring over around and often under the grease smoke a mechanical it seems funny now but it was and then each car was learning from its predecessor a new era was speeding ahead with the swiftness of the automobile yet there were many rough spots tires were the automobile which at first had been only for the wealthy was being priced within the reach of most american family there still were mechanical addicts but they always care to stay which half century later these early then two jaw toes recall an age of bustle bowler hats and high buttons you they were the trailblazers in the transportation revolution that changed the course of our nation and brought a new way
highway most of them don't but we must get down to the sputters the guys are country lies mostly along the course of the firehole river that's a hot name yellowstone as this is a great place to live up there if you have some ham you can have some one ham and eggs if you have the eggs and this water is hot and i mean step in and try it all you have to do is hold a dig in there for less than three minutes and she comes as hard boiled as a marine sergeant no one car geysers how come listen my children and you'll he that guys are isn't of ok no air opting water it is a periodically erupting spring the water runs in the from melting snow or rain and when it gets down the vent hole and meets the terrific heat of the motion lava down below gradually what with the pressure from below forcing the water rapidly back up through the narrow passage she gets all hepped up and bursts into steam which counties the water on top up with it s simple then according to the size of the opening in the earth it takes so many minutes or hours to get up steam again this is called emerald pool beautiful  and now we approach the real spotter no politician can compare with the big fellow over yonder is old faithful lodge the most extensive looking building in the world nearest point to the old faithful geys the world's greatest there's another big one called the giant s and there used to be a student bigger guys are there some c r but she quit cold in eighteen ninety and never gave a gasp since pluto the janitor down yellowstone lake you simply can't avoid this lake it has one hundred miles of shoreline inside the park the largest high level lake in america seven thousand seven hundred thirty feet elevation home of the famous cut throat trouble if you catch them they're so humiliated that well anyway