MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
so earlier we had the opportunity to view the wonderful art work of the top twenty talented artists and i'd like to introduce them to you please stand and we're going to hold a applause for this one is going to take a while so please stand as i read your name cindy buyer i'm sorry cindy bender majestic beauty betsy berman martin and fifty shades of may purple passion kimberly hagar uplifting thank you all for sharing your tale and thanks pieces truly our remarkable question and now the winning piece for the two thousand and fourteen festival this year's winner is a self taught artist whose works have been featured in numerous west michigan juried exhibitions and received several awards this artist has been featured on fox seventeen and in the grand rapids press her style was often impressionistic and abstract sometimes motivated by quirky compositions always rich with colors and textures that catch the the winning pieces a balancing act a once contemporary and timeless abstract and concrete dramatically dark and beautifully light it was chosen not only for its old dutch masters feel but for the way it represents  legs stately strong dignified the artist sees them as brave and representative of the human spirit in the words she's chosen to title her peace well congratulations karen i hope that this evening you have had a chance to meet someone new to network with others learn a bit more about the festival and twenty wonderful entries  third bank new north center the image group and our host this evening the commons at evergreen this evening also included in that packet is a membership form remember the first if you don't sign up tonight with him i get free parking at bloomberg fireworks so don't forget that on your way out and the white house group is also giving you a stylus to touch to vote for your favorite for the viewers choice award and you can read that on your way out the door our full brochure of events will be published the first week of march and we think our partnership with group two or media who is helping us with the layout and design of that publication and holland for their partnership in printing the wonderful piece that will be our spring brochure we look forward to seeing you again in may as we celebrate the eighty fifth to look time festival and have a great evening and drive safely home thanks
so the basis of my skill set is in physics and mathematics but over the course of my research i've discovered i need other skills i need to learn how to build and machine materials i need to design instruments as well as
east japan is a colorful land of conquest it still has many beautiful garden graced by lovely ladies dressed in the ancient style more than two hundred thousand tried to stop the islands of japan largest is the great buddha of kamakura about thirty miles from tokyo symbolic of the burst and dignity of the japanese people it is more than seven hundred years old made a bronze the border is forty two feet high weighs two hundred thousand pounds visitors may climb steps inside and out of the i along with the old they all see the new japan a nation of ninety seven million people with supermarkets the latest western style fashion fast moving traffic of all guy japan also is the land of the rising sun sometimes this is yokohama harbor at nine in the morning when the yokohama is revealed as one of the world's busiest  hama also is the headquarters for beatrice foods metal gold dairy operations in the far ea strung out south of equipment such as the marginalise are in the foreground and the processing bats behind them are comparable to that found in leading plants in the united states butterfat  filled with milk they are sent to the mess hall is for use in cooking these six gallon dispenser units are sent to post exchange mess hall and ships are service men going to have as much milk as they want milk also was packaged in quartus have gotten containers for sale at post exchanges one of the most popular items is ice cream bars to many flower display a nation that dates back twenty five hundred years japan is indeed a  and the youngsters marching in formation all the school in westernized such as this gourmet serviette these products and many more originate from this roll of stainless steel only the fighters nonmagnetic stainless steel with the highest corrosion resistance as you this twenty one hundred pound roll is worth a thousand dollars here blanks are stamped out by a one hundred ton press at the rate of fifteen hundred brower the next step is drawing or for me these rectangular steam table pans you see most restaurants are being fought this is the on another machine meanwhile hundreds of other products are in various stages of production here cocktail jiggers are being farmed on a full turn machine faster than you can make a this machine taps salt and pepper shakers at the rate of four thousand per hour coffee every time three and one half minutes each bloomfield carton serviettes is made to the highest standards this press forms the show them the shelves are welded to  the upright thirty six wells per car now for the final polish to bring out the natural beauty of stainless steel because stainless steel is so expensive wasted this piece of scrap is turned to disprove this one crown blank is cut out for this team table cost sixty one thousand dollars inspectors check each piece then white but with a special detergent that kills all bacteria every product of bloomfield must meet the rigid standards of the national sanitation foundation the us public health laws and the us medical corps whether it appears on silex restaurant equipment home field food service products hospital where products or
i'll try again jerry size for a pen and petition of benjamin bratt they please the court mr president strongest argument in this case is the uncertified issue in which he simply says that the district court erred in do you agree with that my position with members is that it's simply not a political to this case but for two reasons the most important reason the legal reason is that the holding is based on plan of the forward five four to concluded that the claim here nothing's usted where is it have been sufficiently exhausted they should have been allowed to go out and get a hearing on the merits and that was in error of substantial law my position is that that qualifies in effect a government created impediment under twenty eight u s c section twenty two forty four b one b and if you buy that argument that was a government created impediment that was never removed and because it was never removed discussion ever began  imperfect self defense in that they fail to inform the jury of an additional factual predicate to the crime of murder in those cases a predicate as crucial for the crime murder as the elements listed in those murder instructions that the jury find the on the reasonable doubt the the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt the absence of the heat of passion and provocation when the issue is properly instructed in a homicide case then he gets into the sixth amendment and he says instructional error which would lead to the people yes but did he could have been sufficiently so that he should not have been thrown out of district court yes
impression perhaps it was that the not problem my impression of that last week noted in the position coming into the day was that if we get to that issue because the board didn't speak to it we should remand under ventura which  spouse relationship here which is exactly what i thought you were telling us not to address that and you go back to the board under for the government you mean yes and because it wasn't covered it passes if the shoe was on the other foot you know they had they had an issue they thought was dispositive in their favor he he dealt i guess you could say you know more of conclusions by saying words like puzzle confused as a faulty etc now on page twenty eight twenty nine of our estimation would be when he refused or was unable to answer where in the world did this claim of being wanted for check napping and robbery ever come from and he the judge going through the transcript and then there are other things that will be reflected in the transcript and all one of the problems than the current plan always has with the meter you ations is demeanor includes a lot of nonverbal certain transfer now what is the obligation of an certain way or the kind of things that human beings thanks that you can tell by looking at somebody what is the i g supposed to do to make a record about the basis for him to make a better record he should have gone which actually killing  y or articulate you should have linked it out in some matter so that you would know and dog that's what's missing for the most part that every trial judge looks for in hearing a witness and the one think that the judge did articulate was that this abortion certificate and the
very clearly you know every rule is a remedy it's something we don't like extending to new situations here a bunch of examples of new situations we haven't extended it to and with  argument that we're making is that gang and morsi that there has been the assumption that these two should be applied to revocation supervisor release but the question i was asked and this was to extend more to the probation well is there are other relevant differences the courts in that case are there weren't relevant differences our argument is that if you look at aga revocation of supervised release is just you know changing the original sentence for the underlying crime if we're going to have an exclusionary rule that sentencing and not it supervised release that would be a little nighty so maybe are you going to argue that it needs to be the they want to run with on supervised release some of which are imposed at the time the original sentence but over and over we see that down people can come back to the court they can modify the conditions maybe have some of the trial with a clear punishment of the classes and so i think that those are things that make it a lot different than what the court was considering getting in those walls and mor
zoning board of appeals in the house important feels for the city of holland we are here to respond to applications for variances and or special exceptions this board must try to interpret each application as it relates to the ordinance the board this board is not empowered to nor take any action that could be considered reason if you'd like to speak to one or more of the applications we ask that you come to the microphone state your name and address typically hear from the applicant first then anyone supporting the application then we hear from anybody opposing it typically we do the public hearing with each application then deliberate and decide on each on that application before moving to the next step of should we welcome you to stay for the deliberations but there will be no more opportunity for public comment if you elect not to stay for the deliberation in decision you can call the city clerk's office after eight thirty tomorrow morning to learn the result i believe  can you describe the application yeah the houses sat three point four feet from the property line and they want to add a bathroom and main floor laundry because  family member is in a wheelchair and the existing bathroom on the main floor is not accessible so without going too many feet towards the rear elevation i just drew it to the side that it was existing in that's the main purpose of what i need to do with all expend you know without too much cost is obvious if i go out further and not quite as wide if i follow the five foot setback and it go further back in order to get the handicapped bathroom in there edition is in a side yard i believe it's a corner of the planet is along within it is along the existing building setback that encroaches on a side the side yard it'll conform with the use to the zoning code with our two uses it's not adding an additional user to the premises it's in character with the neighborhood there won't be any detriment to adjoining property or to the neighborhood and the applicant stated that it will comply with all moving on to approval of minute approve the august twenty third support all those in favor say aye all those in opposition t
burden the location expert testified that appellant past work and generally performed required frequent handling and a dictionary of occupational titles describes his job was retail store managers requiring frequent handling fact that he testified that all skilled jobs require frequent handling however the ael jay found the appellant was limited to only i teach until simple gripping movement limitations to lightworkers that he has no transferable skills according to vito's the money and he was fifty five years old on august one two thousand  limitations imposed by the l j that there is no transferable skill and we have the claimant being fifty five at the alleged onset date and we have it we have a rule directing it there's no other work  claimant mainly described mental limitations rather than he had problems for example in answer to the question please explain how your condition keeps you from working he wrote i can't make myself a social person working with people i try and stay off the sales floor as much as possible i get extremely agitated when someone you can't do it right and in this case under under is entirely allowed to look at past work as actually performed and look at the forms that are better in the record and it'll describe how the past work was actually performed and then the allegation allowed to make that finding that that's correct however not permitted to make a vocational vocational finding about how a job is generally performed there are only two ways the the l j can get that that evidence obviously the how the work is generally performed not how this claimant perform that you need to have somebody who's going to know how strongly you don't want to be you know a rocket scientist know what a manager or chemist or does for me what you need extra testimony for on that and i can see where you need a vocational expert to testify that he's not able to find other work in the economy but everybody knows what a camera store manager does well the internet you see in the record the n c a a didn't think that there would be  a j makes makes a finding where he says ok i find that one can one can open a box without doing any grouping action commissioner and i think they're stuck thank you thank you very much thanks to both counsel the case just argued is submitted
why did you kill the bastard cash cause what are you talking about you killed a highly respected diplomat tell me why he was a communist how do you know because he's russian stop messing around let's do this right that's what give us the information we need yeah what are you talking about
well kelsey make proceed good morning your honour's i'm george mother she had plaintiff in this action i would like to reserve three minutes you may do so there's going to rules thirty three and thirty four argue with you that there is no subject matter jurisdiction you would quarrel with that right know subject matter jurisdiction subject matter jurisdiction lapsed because the trial panels jurisdiction last april third one thousand two thousand and two ok they lost their subject matter jurisdiction in failing to conduct a trial within the sixty day period of the  over the arizona defendants no no no no jurisdiction if the arizona court did not have jurisdiction over the person or the subject matter many courts many courts use the i would like to point out the pennzoil versus texaco case the opinion of justice marshall and they're used in  overbroad standing to bring an action outstanding to bring a case on behalf of somebody in arizona that is looking for a lawyer that's their business not yours while i believe overbroad standing alone allows that i briefed heavily of first amendment free speech and  restraint it's specifically in violation of the piper versus new hampshire and they say that if if you have an attorney that resides or offices within the state of arizona he names listed here so whoever you are counsel please tell us how you intend to use your ten minutes thank you your honor my name is leslie and hacky i represent the state bar defendant lauren brown in this matter to my right fairly confident on our pretty fair and what were the arguments made in our brief with the exception that you may have specific direct questions that might apply to each of us separately and to have you addressed to each have ruled fifty four and under fifty four i cannot challenge fundamentally you can't raise the constitutional issue of lack of service or or jurisdiction of the court that says that no doctrine preclusion rocker fellman younger or any of those are applicable if a state has a rule that precludes the raising of constitutional issues as moreover the court is considered incompetent by reason of bias if they have such a rule about local  if you are not allowed by the state court to raise constitutional issues in that proceeding then the court is incompetent by reason rule fifty four i prevents me from raising constitutional issues with regard to start this process and with regard to your
one perfect little chilly but perfect for working through a group man of common interest stories community service work and supporting each other make good on our commitment we say we're going to do something in our lives that we have a lot of men around us that are there to hold us accountable to to doing those things so we do we mean on a regular basis usually but every other two weeks it is interesting because this group is just an average mix so some of them are fixed very experienced contractors carpenters but we have dentists lawyers we have a lawyer on site today messed up but just so we have folks that are skilled and folks that are just committed to doing work but the tightness this largely because again if we say we're going to show up for this particular project serve the community specifically on the schoolhouse to find out should we sell it should we rescue it and overwhelmingly over eighty percent nearly four hundred survey respons preserve and save the building so here we are this is step one to demonstrate to the community that we've begun in earnest and we will continue the next steps ar
undermining actions of the police are so long that i think that as an element that that is totally missing from the confessional and basically
least at some point there might be a due process
no actual interchange with the children that he had taught her so over thirty years and i know she was very very troubling fact she served on the record after some soul where he could have gone below she could have absolutely and i think there were many factors that would it would have been reasonable for her to consider and and in fact go go area we try to keep up on the cases these seem to be the four cases that everyone's looking at now we're looking for guidance and just given the severity and the effect that this sentence will have on th man's life we're asking the court to at least wait until these decisions are made let us brief number by letter prefer how are you think is appropriate i don't think there's a downside to it other than o that's always a factor but  well we'll talk about it we should i thank you very much we'll talk about it and  and you know you can parse the language of course that's what lawyers do but you know essentially he's in a very small apartment with three law enforcement people one has to look at  sentence the record in this case unlike perhaps some other cases that are pending before the court not only has a written order with factual findings extensive factual findings on a motion to suppress but also as the  transcript of the sensing hearing indicates the judge made a very thoughtful decision and described in detail how she came to that decision and really on this record  i questioned them with a polygraph they concluded he was telling the truth when he says that he never you never touched the child and even if that is true that the fact is that the district court did not did not use any allegation or any intimation that he had committed any kind of sexual contact when she determined to sentence her sentence was based on the child pornography image that defendant talk or not talk that he printed off of the internet that he also had on his computer the fact that he was part of an industry supporting this kind of abuse and he paid to get these images and clearly given the twenty two binders and his time on the computer he had spent a lot of time with  his credit card being identified still in light of the record your honor is the government would submit that the district court not only created adequate record for this court to evaluate its decisions but also that the decisions should be upheld a that might give some light to some of the legal issues i don't think in this particular case that those legal issues are critical to the court's decision the court laid out its reasons and went over the thirty those facts and we submit that not only did the court wheels facts but that those facts support the court
are your rules of conduct of the state of florida those rules of the state of florida incorporated by reference by the local local thank you thank you very much
of the distinctions is that in that case colin conceded that there was nothing if the riemann have a good issue and we have the examples of so we think that the decision that the third criteria from the record but it up it seems to make a point because it makes the point that these two motions are separate disabilities because they limit the veterans in separate ways if you're able to extend your arm to the side abduction for deliberating under diagnostic code fifty two or one in fact the regulations civically allow that particular situation it's clear that objection can receive multiple ratings for one injury i think after bond speaks to that it's also and two ratings under fifty two we think it would be consistent to allow two ratings under fifty to one if you're limited in one direction if you're limited in two directions because that would compensate the veteran for a more severe disability wings decisions is designed to address a situation where the veteran is actually challenging the decision to remove a case that actually would be  enough medical evidence to give you anything on the second rung so therefore why would anybody have a reach that again when it comes up here because we had it so isn't that in fact moving the issue well remit and it was really minute to consider whether the criteria for forty percent were applicable so the nature of that remained is that the court would have to they already had twenty they would have to consider the criteria under forty the therefore this issue would move but do you disagree with the suggestion that judgment had that there's a difference between being for lack of evidence and sort of legal b i don't agree i believe that this is a courtroom we won't begin to question that the court should just now you know there's at least four other cases that are dealing with this exact question and they need to appeal also so i like the point about it what cases would we ask the williams hurdle if it were if we u not an issue the issue is whether we can have multiple this is deliberating under diagnostic a fifty two or one so the fact that we have the one vote the rating under fifty nineteen does not make our case closer to the  situation also the secretary referred to section four point one four and four point one three to where in which case the regulations say