six months your honor i believe that's a red herring to me looking at a conviction that happened for a murder that took place for ten or fifteen years before the threats that were made against mr mendoza the record indicates that mr mendoza lot of political interference here one thing that wasn't really addressed by the agency is that mr mendoza as a member of a minority political party the labor party and essentially the jurisdiction of his  you know that said the fact remains that when he was there he did experience a death threat and that the the agency here on to found out that constituted past persecution when you receive that death right but the two thousand and fourteen and two thousand and fifteen versus attorney general all of which were cases where the court the ultimate conclusion that the evidence compelled the contrary result but still looked at the evidence that was before and said well there was a lot here that was missed by the agency and we believe the testimony that was presented on behalf of the petitioner and then goes that were goes ahead and specifically in their decision says even though i do not refer to even what is not referred to by taking into account the entire record and evidence admitted i think this government did not successfully prosecute any of the twenty nine cases that take this one person h r w had investigated that was in the police thirteen record i could go on and on and on i mean it looks like and throughout these throughout these particular country reports it was there's indication that the government is attempting to do something although not doing it well and not able to do it well but they are attempting to do something with regard to combating the criminal strifes that is perpetuated i guess throughout hundred or so and i think what's even most important is in this particular case we don't have simply a stack of country reports information and that is all in the record we have actual facts with regard to this specific illian with regard to what has occurred to him and his family in honduras and there is evidence that not only the evidence was provided by petitioner and that was found to be a finding of fact by the immigration judge is that of justice that we are satisfied with the prosecution that's not to see that here just leave it is utterly unable and willing to protect this particular petitioner from this persecution that the government is not able to control and if anything in prosecuted convicted these are these are part of examples and i think that's one of the main reasons that agency doesn't delve into the significant amount of information in the country are poor but compared to the punishment that one would is is assassinated due to his political opinion receiving two years or six months or whatever you got up to you know even longer than two years if we want to talk about it is enough for our perception of justice but that's really not  judge does nothing but it turns out that the judge is related in some way to parties that would be at a federal to lead those it doesn't look pretty it does not your honor and i understand your hon concern with regard to that but what i would do is is that i have to take this square i think back to what the standard is in this particular case there's the record evidence here compel a contrary conclusion we can sit here and argue over what the facts and what the record facts to a threat on mendoza's life especially when the person making the threat a previously comatose astronomer and specifically here with regard to the withholding withholding of removal the concept of willful blindness goes to with regard to with regard to these particular pieces that the government here is clearly unable to control things because they don't even convict if the person billy billy investigate the pursuit of the group across the country i mean the much either way it doesn't look good i understand and i think this is a situation again where people were sort of parsing with the facts of the record facts of what they are but it goes to these particular record  conviction the prosecution the arrest of this petitioners aliens in honduras this petition has relatives in honduras with regard to the political issues and those anderson and i understand the concern and i think that if you even look at the facts with regard to the most recent death threats that this particular petitioner faced in honduras although we can see that he went to th evidence of a relationship there's no question and then he are going would be is this particular judge one of you corrupt judges in honduras that that the petitioner went and went ahead and went to conduct the investigation and is the deference that it does say it's exert excessive influence it doesn't say one hundred percent of the judiciary is corrupt and i would also add that no you know there is no situation which there is no corruption anywhere and if it was a simple fact that we were just looking at country reports and having indication of what this country reports say with regard to his political opinion we might have a better argument but i think what factoring in what we see holland breweries do to protect  would add a release after the fact with regard to his family with these are well that was convictions that these are monumental steps for the honduran government to take and for us to sit here now and say that this even though we're not happy with