here shows where it was originally recorded and the green shows where it was built and it was built that way to avoid cutting down trees so we kind of sneaked his public township both face that was set aside as part of the hidden valley manor plant the reason for this reconfiguration of luck for a seven is that the shed  include all the private improvements on the private line the plan before you tonight reconfigures the lot for zero seven by adding point zero four acres of land from the open space that will include all the private improve its improvements in make those improvements compliant with ours owning a lot in terms of setbacks as part of that this point zero four acres here off of lot for us seven will be added to the open spaces equal swap of private land and public open space this plan simply reconfigures lot for  reconfiguration with an additional condition added to my to emily's number was june fifth and that is that we are going to require a new deed be recorded for this reconfigured live with some languages including the deed that this current owner in any future owner of this lot will be responsible for maintaining this portion of the township of space that was one of the biggest contentions that we've heard from the opposition is that they're concerned that this portion of open space will become a nuisance and that it will be maintained i think the stewards have agreed to it it'll be language included in the d so that future owners know that they're responsible for maintaining that portion of the open space so it does not become a nuisance to them in addition to that the stewards now that they need to move their fence and move the fire pit out of the locusts they've agreed to all of those conditions therefore stats recommending approval subject is to conditions listed in the report plus an additional condition that physically remove the country for bit restorer they have to do this in its natural state that is correct and that is a condition of our recommendations the other condition would be a maintenance agreement it you know well the two that i've been made aware of is that there may be by law questions and there may be nuisance questions relative to the maintenance of this open space and i think that with the a members to i j complaint with the township and have their enforcement issue addressed correct correct we received a letter from the township dated june fourth which i believe falsely represents the township's position on this matter if you have a copy of it but it is a letter june fourth the property owners were sent out to leave six hundred feet on either side of the property  her asking for the land transfer and if you look at paragraph her time story the second sentence which is of the third line the purpose is to accommodate the pool and its setbacks i think that misrepresentation of this land transfer is to just do settle improvement violations i don't have a problem with my neighbor still i don't have an issue with that  for the patio which surrounds the pool the shed and the fence for which there was no permit issued for their fence my property like i said borders three fourteen's of the ridge road on the three sixteen so we share a common border where they are planning on taking that land and converting it to come into place as i just stated i do not have a problem with the full my problem is why should i be adversely impacted by are impacted by the resolutions to fix somebody else's mistakes the township is trying to accommodate someone who is in violation of township rules which affects my property which i purchased nine years ago and before that little piece was taken out it was a wide open lot my lot in a neighboring lot this didn't i feel is diminished is inversely effect my property value i've talked to several m members of the township and requested that they consider selling the encroached upon land to the stewards or to three fourteen bucks for a drug this would resolve the homeowners dispute the township's  construction began and was completed before the township had it with time to review it and at that point it was too late but was and it's also my understanding that at the time this permit was filed the township didn't inspector came out yes the pools in the backyard but there's no reference there it's it's rather hard for him to tell if it is the pool on the property tons of homeowners property or has it improved upon township property there was nothing for him to reference therefore i type believe the township has some responsibility and you know why why that we're at the point that we are today all the items encroaching on township property were completed after the full however they're all dependent on where the pool is located for when it first the shed one and obviously to accommodate the pull the were omissions therefore because the board consider sale selling this in protest property to the stores whether you decide to sell the land where do land transfer you are making a concession where the other so why not sell the land and leave my property alone if and only if the township is going to make a concession select a resolution that only effects the immediate parties enough  asking you resolve the issue in a way which does not detrimentally financially impacts my property it's not my problem these were not my heirs and the remedy should in no way impact my property the the area where the fire pit is here yes the the whole religion going to be swapped for the approach to foreign land ok i just want to clarify that because i'm having trouble making the connection to offer two things one it's going to be outside their reach design to fence what's really going to make that homeowner come outside and cut their property number one number two if they don't i end up in a dispute am i supposed down turn that my neighbor into the township saying hey he's not cutting the grass in this little piece of property that has been deeded to you know the next to this house is actually on the market so the next homeowner that comes in here it may be in their date because i think we deal with the issues before us is presented in that's the way and swung itself to make sure that there conforms with the township codes in those related manners  is samuel hayes three or four buffalo ridge road i'm actually the president of homeowners association i was not going to speak tonight at all i'm just here is an observer the only reason i'm getting up to speak is  in something that you would mention that it is the planning commission's duty are within their scope within your scope to decide what is allowable within the zoning permits  zoning laws of of the township and then to make a recommendation you can't recommend that they sell the land but for example you could recommend that it is still within the ordinances to sell them  if council chose to do that is that correct that's i know that's not the proposal the reason i'm the reason i'm saying that is because and i'm having this issue too i may end up being in front of you on my own  case but the parcel d which is actually the open space parcel to the rear of the property there is is the parcel we're talking about in in the township final plant that was filed it says that the open space in our subdivision has to have forty has to equal forty percent and actually it was forty three percent so if there were the recommendation that this could be sold to the homeowners to settle this dispute without affecting the border of either neighbors this would and i understand you can't recommend selling in the land but you can recommend it selling in the land would still be within the minimum amount of open decide if one of the options is perhaps to settle this remedy by scientists on the land that would be with still within the measurements so you wouldn't be recommending anything that would go against the township ordinance and that's the only reason ok understood i'm a double header ye now i would entertain a motion through or recommendation to prove the consolidation subject to the two conditions