like you know the facts of this case are not that complicated i highly encourage you all to read the transcript i was there for that right said to judge powers these days give me a hearing on this issue of whether or but what i was trying to argue was is that there was a kind of comparative moment by the trucker that he was either speeding or that he was nationally didn't care i heard a lot of experts to go out process the scene and pull his truck apart  uninsured coverage as being a factor in his in his calculus and he basically said as a better a law even though i know nothing i'm not going to allow you to i'm not going to allow you to make contract aren arguments i struggle history first of all when there's a three million dollar policy and there's a that seventeen year old ok when you take an offer you take twenty five to six to fifteen i don't think that's a substantial increase it's certainly a double the original so you know i mean there's i mean the reality of this is there's a market value out there and you know i've spent fifteen years of places where i spent twelve years as a prosecutor a county state's attorney so i've had some experience and been you know you know the high line from the practice a lot out there actively doing what i do and my clients and helping people and i just felt that two hundred dollars was not adequate compensation thousand five hundred forty dollars representing fifty two point seven hours of two hundred dollars an hour on the most important point off the bat and mr simpson just indicated he referred to this as a matter of law and so that's really the question here today players take positions this is actually meet within the discretion of the trial court in the standard is an abuse of discretion and in his grief in here today he calls it as a matter of law i'm entitled to this evidentiary hearing but in his briefs in here today he's produced absolutely these because they're in the best position to not only understand the work that goes into that type of case this being a wrongful death case but the work that went into that particular case and he himself was in the best position because he actually witnessed the work that was performed by the dis course they can't speak for the judge having presided over the case from the outset and of course similar cases like that watching the attorneys perform the work seeing what was done he determined that this case did not qualify as an exception to that general rule that  subpoena for different people to testify regarding the work that not only he performs on this case but the work that the success of law attorney jason whiteside performed as well as subpoenaing the defense attorney on this case in the insurance company discretion to be able to move away he indicated i'm not going to sit here and write line by line on a note paper and add all the work that you want to test i did on this case i want you to submit to me your time sheets and indicate what you're claiming that you did on this getting the case resolved the settlement having problems at the end of the day this is about the clients and what the clients want clearly there was something that happened in mr sensis law firm they produced an unhappy and ultimately resulted in the case settling with the allowing courage to use their own experiences in determining what is a properly attorney a proper training just hours in a kid that in his experience fitting in will county a lot of attorneys are worth less than two hundred dollars an hour he specifically noted in making his fin five hundred forty dollars to the case it was obviously informed decision based upon his experience from go county based on the time sheets and other information that you learned from mr sense in that and it's even litigation that this was a informed decision and it was not an attorney situations where we are limited in this issue you know your have later long after the the litigation the underlying case is wrapped up in the course in the best position to determine having witnessed firsthand what the attorneys are done with the case and tails and what work goes into the case and for that reason their decision should not be overturned absent abuse of discretion for those reasons concerning the cannot be said there was an abuse of discretion including the fact that logically impossible to say we're going to make a comparison about how much work was done we're not pulling those sites have the new formation i have no moral case that bars that type of discovery in this situation frankly i was  on motivated to try to get money from the truck driver and they knew that there was a three million dollar policy but i think they're having financial problems that trying to second guess the decision i mean i think i really can see that i might take