MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
yeah glad to meet you mr scott  here most people don't stay right here in town mostly they have their own place around the lake somebody certainly ben here campbell was right when he said plenty was happening up here whoever that was outside came into this house to send she's not here now how do you account for that i don't know but i'm positive he's not upstairs anyway let's rus from
have you any more ideas on that subject oh no no not at all then you're already is and yeah what's with this yes hades but that i suppose i'll have to explain it to him i i'll stick around a while you know i've never seen a thing yes but there's not much to it i assure you now no i don't think you would like it now you kno chicken my favorite but isn't it rather unusual to i just explained to you or you explain that you go around with all the girls in brooklyn and then you don't marry any one of them you're going to give it with my daughter don't worry he's going away after the fiesta perhaps to be taken care of its what about johnny and his partner may be no no no i'll take care of them myself i remember i don't want anything to go wrong i got a chance to show that on the street tomorrow it's that old fool  i don't know if it's true what they say about about your record but even if i don't know how many wrinkles you have you one minute i make a wish do you wish that i'll always be but i guess when it comes to love all women are i'll be back in a few minutes even criminals and aiding them to escape johnny i know yes yes i do too what it's a lot like mr templeton got you by the big toe and your you may have me by the big toe but he's practically got you by the neck it's johnny very strong but it's the police were here looking for you and only police it's where they know you haven't done anything wrong have you all needed a little wrong i've done you can put in your laughter but they were asking for too many cont penny let me know johnny and you're saying and i saying we'll have the musicians i'm going to get my place
case fifteen dash three five six eight and my
case thirteen twenty four ninety eight stand up across versus brian jones at all argument not to exceed fifteen minutes per side mr flynn for that shooting there were the officer testifying that he was moving his shop and barrel around right before the shot it was a lot of smoke coming off of this flash bang grenade and we have something similar in here  i guess he's disoriented along with the other officers the trailing because of the flash and you know what i want to make it judge in toledo use to issue an opinion apparently any day or i guess it's past due and then as i say that the shooting seizure portion of the case that segment is going to trial in september and that
factual issue with respect to parties who are going to be taking custody have to be in court have to be the it just does come down to a question of how the
exercise that jurisdiction and finally for us it was based upon a finding of fact that both the state court action and the court action concern trust administration and i think that last part if i may
presented to these witnesses we know she murdered because the dogs hit on the carpet they they had those statements before the expert mom came out and used the dog's crap i'm not own biological evidence and the training that i'll see dr susan because i can't see your last name the training that dr susan talked about with these dogs is can be very different than what happened in so you there's always a possibility of confirmation bias can you have an opportunity for a reply although i do believe that it was a good argument that the evidence was not unduly prejudicial because of the overwhelming evidence testimonial evidence from the defendant's family his daughter mirabelle his sister nurses about the also learning on the by products of human decomposition my mind is it's nothing to do it's the same sense of the dogs it's their sense of smell it's the same process dogs can be trained tech drugs competition you know variety of will but it's all the same science it's the ability of dogs to detect the particular scent that they are trained to detect and then they're free to consider such literature deciding whether or not a scientific method use new novel or whether it's good general acceptance yes rather are we supposed to just do it all on our own who can the parties direct our attention to scientific literature that we might review so i presume there was no criteria in that case because we all know the dog scoots know better things or what i worry it's just not novel anymore like it would have been in one nine hundred fourteen months what's the difference i decided that there were two different routes and that might indicate more then one perpetrator and me down really wasn't that wasn't the dog's off that was the interpretation mind the ha
probation violation or federal big and then at that time looking for the people living room lives about this deal is there any evidence of appeal he's telling the truth at that he's just telling them what you know they want to hear that he doesn't come back later on is just  guilt he was just making that he never did dispute the course that the guns were handed out rather the number was correct there was no evidence that what he said about live and associate with to know travis was just the person who lived across the street and who needed some help on a probation violation now verdict and he says there is some case law assume that little is the correct verdict and you have to make that presumption in order to buy the defendant's argument that they correctly found him not guilty and and then  simply not the case first of all i think we need to consider whether these even are inconsistent birds degree that there was another man in the trailer that night a consistent verdict the gun came from somewhere and i think it is very reasonable that the jury said they couldn't come from anywhere other than the defendant's  i think it's important that the the in and explaining it right inconsistent verdict it says of course cannot look for a rational explanation for jury leniency because leniency not operate in a rational manner so i'm assuming these are inconsistent verdict they're inconsistent verdict and and to assume that th days earlier that he would ask the person that lives in france to the mobile home park to keep an eye out for this car and they went outside and  from this trailer he certainly could not see inside the fence frame how do you know that they were in the kitchen and food was being there how would he know the occupants of the trailer simply knowing that they were eating knowing that i was trying to look up the name of the second man that took the gun and didn't find it right off the bat but  he was not promised anything for his past he was not offered he'll be was not offered any consideration he was not threatened by the police he even wanted to testify against the  even the fact the witness is a self confessed criminal and expects leniency does all by itself raise reasonable doubt we have to also consider the victim
living side by side also want to put out a plug for valley state which is coming up on august tenth that's out in huntington right on the main road music starts i think that  a whole day of great music starting off with the modern grass quintet of which i to which i belong this one's on the cd and into i think it's one of the best ones don't you
really the problem with the definition of construction because the definition of construction moves from construction to basically any enterprise that has anything to do with definition to it and a specific case addressing that but i don't think that you will my businesses should be subject to this is one of the issues that was originally the basis of the decision and  subpoena invalid because because there's no i wouldn't go to the complaint there is no time limitation in the complaint we were not given any information regarding the location any building to radically the definition of construction which applies to any one or subtracting from any building structure a highway roadway street bridge  standards for those who apply it does authorizing or even encouraging victory or discriminatory in person and again when counsel is talking about this i thought it was pretty clear the way she was describing the statute that it isn't clear and that there
were so severe that she never ever left alone mr campbell she had to be here all the time because of her problems more generally as an ex wife and the son testified that the ex wife was almost always spoken to lot of these things in six years but nevertheless these two girls have rose stories of social friday and apparently were going to do anything about it and that's the problem prostitution has a subtle way these girls are embarrassed
small occasion of an expert based upon an abuse of discretion but i would contend this for that nothing could be more of an abuse of discretion then disqualification of this expert on the ground district of texas took the very issue that was posted and made it the basis for this fall occasion dr trager he also made some allusions to there
are nothing more than traditional slip and fall claims and the circuit court granted summary judgment on two bases as just walker pointed out that we raised number one being constructive notice of a dangerous condition on the property and number two that of course whatever word there may have been assuming that play into the taking place his testimony is true that whatever rally was there accumulated naturally those are both questions absolutely a duty of becomes unreasonably slippery or dangerous now in order to invoke that exception plaintiff would have to provide some evidence number one that the material that was used the p v c material itself became very slippery and at guaranteed great field and the purpose of that study was to determine how slippery this particular route was where the incident occurred when let's and the results of that report showed that this particular s property owner what we used as a burst of that they could provide the proper products to the ultimate end user it was the seriousness responsibility in this case mr he heard was the salesman who was also the vice president if the vice president of bennett the roofing contractor the elite contractor who seek a products himself didn't even know about the existence of this product so there is no evidence on the what's called an unnecessarily dangerous condition in the take of case likes and nice and others that followed it f to be some kind of expert testimony to suggest whether protection of the roof surface and not for the protection of the workers or anyone who may be on that roof so in seekers installation manual even though it says a brockway must be installed in high traffic areas it includes reference to the cross  what the word in any way but we don't know that they didn't have all the facts and of course they had here but even you or your representative didn't necessarily know as opposed to a dictionary definition
either wrong insurance or just plain  and frankly i don't think there isn't any other state that requires an insurance company to communicate its card which position i want to be insured but to any claimants out there as well as a general matter case secondly refers to maximum liability limits it doesn't say applicable liability limits and in this policy the maximum white building limits were a million and a and two million general aggregate and that's what was disclosed problems for defense counsel in the position of having to make representations about the insurance the insurance companies covers position and essentially advocate for that coverage position in the context of the interest and the typical conflicts of interest in a way is where you've got alternative theories of liability one which is carburetor and one which isn't the chrysler cases where there's one count for intentional conduct and one count for negligent conduct and the theory is that defense counsel being controlled by the insurance company has the ability to steer the case either in or out of coverage by defending where vigorously he a question of two theories a liability this is just a matter of if the facts show bad week case that the occurrence involves a small tractor and there were car would accept the sub contractor negligence the issue here is and that's really frankly been misrepresented as to what number one is presented at trial that there were two fires funds position is with then and therefore this case was moved in such a sure period of time in advance of the accident they kick when shouldn't be charged with negligence so it's not a case of just because  frankly the issue there's a lot it's a confusing argument to be honest with you because this claim it would mean that the issue was decided and yet also appears to be stating or conceding that the issue
understand i like to just make a comment that essentially this is a debt collection action this complaint is fashioned as a debt collection action i understand that there was some comment we as to whether it could be bootstrap complaint does not state any direct risk of violations committed by any of the parties she corrected pointed out that the parties before the court today were not be parties to the initial all allegations specifically were all take ego conduct took place we found a company that was the focus in business for fifty years we have a very generic allegation of all not implicate federal jurisdiction that is the scram golden peacock and we rely on those
answer if you're saying that you still don't have a basis for the allegation and since it's necessary only for a medical monitoring claim
i was sent to the philadelphia naval station for training as a followed her for in a play cameron played mike i think they sent me there because i had a a blueprint and i was supposed to set up all the barracks was that we were going to by the way we went we went to mountain air force base by train and on the way we started chicago and i went to minsk east but we were no mountain air force base and then we were given leave and and in september flew out to san francisco and board or liberty ship and the air force but i went to japan went to japan in japan and our brought us to go to post sun were redlined they canceled us from going from japan to korea probably because the in the business of my call of psychological warfare we made the negatives for the plates with the camera and then we burn the camera on on some web printing  what happened there was it was it was assigned to the fire department on the on the flight line and all the firemen states and it did survive so then no i know roy i was on the on the base the same time i was but we never met because he was in the fire on the flight line braids was concrete but it was still with bullet holes while i couldn't go off the base with any any any rifles or anything but they did allow it but i got done then and there and then it was good to get out of the jungle and just go up and get the breeze but what did you do when you came home what type of work did you go into well  and we had a large building with no no no windows in it and that was before they put everything on the ground i worked they are told september of  and fifty five i had a bone up for the entrance exam and i went back to high school in colorado springs i didn't realize until i saw that thing admissions by by interview i don't know but interview was the main thing that i got to go to be safe so i got to go to grad school larry interviewed came out to sudbury where i was at the time and they had a picket line and we had to go through the picket line they didn't like us working on at the time it was for side y before i was given the downsize we submitted a proposal to navy for for the final engineering support and my signature at the raytheon controller suggested my name as a consultant to go down there and figure out the financial business first because there was talk took waste around the around the plant and believe it or not we had an insurance you're finding out too much when i was when i was considered were considered overage when when the  keep the germans from coming down through the tunnel into northern italy there's a story about that the swiss they designed t design the tunnel the attendants built it and the germans used it so he was up there and he got frostbite and he couldn't they couldn't he was that he was actually he was assigned all the relatives in italy said you got to come over here because if you don't come you'll never be left they'll never left you leave your back and let you come back and and attlee yeah so he went back he
negotiated with an agreed sentence of nine years and the other was partially negotiated with a twelve year cap the public defender advised mr cox to accept the cap because he's nineteen years was too much at an end by and to a reasonable probability that but for counsel's deficient performance the result of the proceeding would have been different little did note that a logical different outcome in some scenarios would be a showing that a defendant would have  prejudice applies only in cases where i defend it complains that the deficient performance let him to accept a plea offer as opposed to go to trial so ultimately and hell establish a starting point  analysis along those lines it makes no sense to require a defendant to demonstrate he would have gone to trial when the the defendant was never considering going to trial in the well of course person has to file that mechanism just like they would have to file a motion to reconsider sentence that counsel advised him to do and we're not saying that was not mis advice that was deficient advice so we met the first part of strickland but he didn't meet the second part of prejudice because he did have the opportunity then through is later filed motions that were timely to which runs the plea and once those were denied he could  the following removed from his direct appeal at the hearing is not his motion withdraws guilty plea defendant despite that he would have gone to trial if ransey had not told him he could appeal his sentence this court involved as quoting the other supreme court worse than lack of you know proper diet at all he was he did not knowingly or voluntarily enter this plate he entered something that didn't set at that time u
i felt the same way as you when i rented a vacancy for what i thought i'm a dealer in second hand merchandise and i believe in giving value for value received me struck me as odd but somebody was prepared to give four pounds a now suppose you tell me the story as it happened right from the beginning from the beginning yes of course well let it all started two months ago when that preacher came out i was  red enough i've never seen any of it at the end of eight weeks i've finished the a's and begun that the fall this mr ross rewarded me every saturday with old golden sovereigns yesterday morning however i got a staggering duty to inform you that office number four was rented temporarily to william marcus an accountant i never heard of duncan ross nor the rent the league in all my life and i'm certain that never existed i got the home address of william morris but when i what i will never understand is how you suddenly knew there would be a bank robbery if you remember visited the second ten shop spalling was in the cellar i didn't pay much attention to it at the time but later on i noticed the while he didn't like the way you treated him last night too now and then of course he complains that
you've always dreamed of doing by your own medical practice two thousand i'm overwhelmed i suppose that finishes the wilcoxon well not quite on to your cousin charles added most unusual  having made many enemies in my life and suspecting that any one of them may be tempted to bring my three days to an abrupt end i hereby direct no matter how i doubt that shown our combs be engaged to investigate the circumstances of my death live your meals like getting progressively more edible if you can't do better i suggest you find your own home and run it i've tried to do better to elizabeth i like children i flavor strong enough to conceal the taste of arsenic something like grapes for example if you want to know who poisoned the grapes i can tell you that to the person who bought the grapes in a london fruit shop on the days  replacing arsenic candles with harmless ones of course you couldn't be aware of that but you watch that kind of yes in a state like the one that kills a child
you want to talk a little bit about what's going on here ok so we have our four teams we're doing a little mystery basket cooking here sorry i'm not going to interview you said ok the teams are working together and they're going to be judged on creativity and teamwork edibility of their food and then how well they clean up on how well they're cooperating not just with their team but with other teams finishing within our time limits so marcia marcia marcia can tell me about what's going on here well it seems the competition is really getting our you know the groups are getting ready they're getting their ingredients all together you know i think it's going to be it's going to be a good  competition you know really into like a who's hurley believe me you know it's hard to say in these sorts of situations because you know you know everyone's just sort of working out like mega fast speed so it's really oh my goodness what are they making they are i believe it is
the first time we knew it so that was not a risk to the possibility of whether you can try a consumer fraud case and in the small claims court it was necessary that were listed as one of my issues all those things are required in small claims court to do discovery but he could have done when he did nothing until the morning we got to the court room and asked to know what the cause of the action and he was denied because i think to go gregor reflects that he asked he was asked for money to get his tools back which he didn't have in my head and my client was o perceive this way he has been since july of last year with out his truck and with his money being with out his truck means he cannot work with his usual occupation i think the weighted mandate to use the act to eradicate all forms of deception and unfair business practices and true way and really whatever relief is appropriate i do not believe it is appropriate to groups we write to with jury trial but it is not allowed in a consumer fraud case a line for determining what cases can be tried in small claims court the supreme court has not chosen to make any food or don't many asians about what kind of cases can be tried  green and small claims court except to say contractor to work or tax cases and tax cases by the way are statutory after those financial terms were put in there we don't need them my client testified in his witnesses concurred that when he left that ron he thought his paying for he had enough money in his bank account better if he had known his truck was not paid for he could have gone and got the extra thousand dollars
do anything about it usually when you talk about credibility you talk about weight and there's there's somebody on the other side and here we have nobody and it's only by the testimony that she was the only one driving so what  analogy from criminal law i mean we know the insertion cases consent there's a lot of cases that say you know when you didn't really have a belief to make a voluntary decision if the police overrid