the end of twenty fourteen on new year's eve a motion for summary judgment file by our opponents was the wrong on that day that it's in the record that we talked about starting deposition given the denial of the summary judgment on the thursday before presidents day in february they purport of the sent to us request for missions which didn't arrive until the day after president's day so they're saying the thursday before the monday is when they suck them out and we got them on tuesday which was the day after president's and that was the night when we claimed that that was an abuse of discretion in light of the circumstances that were present here number one is the fact that there is no more of the labor that actually on presidents day number two we showed the thursday before president's day as being with date and it was run through the postage meter but there was no i must mark from the post office now in the rules on the they're required to put in order to trigger a four day period they're required put it in the hands of either a post office or the post office box then they're in the same city as we are if you're real annoyed we didn't get it on on friday we didn't get it on sale today we didn't get it sunday or monday because those were days there was no delivery we didn't get it till tuesday and so not only did we ask for one day of grace which we we get it either friday or saturday so the net is you were asking the court to rule that it was an abuse of discretion in or the nose doesn't count and so you should go from the actual time of service rather than the judge matsch below so that he wasn't even wrong on the request to admit when he made his ruling after that was within minutes after he ruled both he wasn't going for a while the request to admit the one day late but that's what he said he said he wasn't relying on those on the request to admit when he entered summary judgment for them but the simple fact of the matter is that the s that train him and he's the only thing that's involved here is the actual arsenal or itself own you'll see on the same color rice photograph that there's three parcels one two and three that there's a building predominantly on personal three that juts just a little bit into person to you can be seen by this photograph a little bit because there is shade thrown off the building which sort of makes the building different documents that she had for some reason with respect to these premises and on the third page of the documents you know actually is that this is that you see for forty one of the and it shows that there are at least fifteen different tenants that occupy this building at the same time the also shown at the very end of that five would not have occurred anyway the people those from they rented from him you know this time they were running from the went to work after we got that affidavit where he said that the company went back to nine hundred twenty six we showed from secretary of state records that that wasn't true that there were at least three different companies involved over that parcel as a right of way so the state highway in its plan book and it makes total sense that the public would have been using because all along you can see the way that it's situated adjacent to harmon highway th easily be true and there was the sort of the highest and best use for this property is probably as a right of way which may be why it's still important to people to possibly be sold to the state of illinois  adversely possessed and not the open area where they said they mowed the grass which is adjacent to grass in the right of way even on this drawing that they should have gotten the whole room so those are  all you need is the intent to passion rights to or to the next individual as well as actual possession by that individual in this case it's clear that since two thousand and ten mr trump has been seen as the owner of parcels one through three and the possess possessed this is a parking lot for a building that has residential tenants business tenants and room construction of course members of the public are going to park in the parking lot because there with respect to the wrong even if you give the parking lot you can't give them the grassy area they say two cases for the proposition that morning when the grass along it generally is insufficient to establish adverse possession possession was permissive as in the other in this case the possession could not have been permissive because the actual title owners did not know that they held title correct and wrong by the statute the statute says says we need to do something if you need to do it on a meet and run holiday that gets extended to the next work day does not apply to a that says the effective day when when something comes in the fact that it doesn't push that to a halt to the next work day and will point to is that the statute says in the forms and this is on that sunday and they don't push it back because of course not open that day rebel this thread like to stress is that we're asking the court to affirm the trial court's finding of summary judgment in favor of my client mr wrong community construe he was being the owner of that property thank you very much  position that there was no adverse or hostile possession because people thought that that was right of way to the state highway and it was used accordingly you can have people  anybody else on behalf of trustees doing anything and so it's been our contention all along we facetiously at one time called it one big battle route but that's sort of the way that they treat of the thing without making the fine points about which corporation or expressed owned it or individual which tenant rebate acting through the right wood road construction the main tenant why would they be considered just because he owns the construction company your first five or six years well i've done this since one thousand a d and that's when we had to go to the public record of secretary of state and and through the recorders office and said it's not you this is not you know on a morning when we actually have corporations we actually hostile i think you're right it's sort of an impossibility thing like he doesn't think he's the owner he doesn't know that our clients are the owners of our clients don't know that they're the owner everybody thinks it's the state he treat