MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
would require that the defendant use some force against the person and and then if in essence is force to be done with against someone to cause some sort of use more violence against a person on the state's focus is on what the defendant is doing instead the focus and the correct focus for rather self defense applies is whether it is what is being done to the refused medical treatment now the question then becomes is it reasonably message it does is it reasonable for him to need that that is unnecessary force to take to stop the bad in your hypothetical it seems perhaps if you had not refusing can set eric refuse to give his consent refused any treatment and then suddenly starts pulling wires off this would not seem to be reasonably necessary force to be using perhaps at that point the reasonable respon concern with respect to drown yes but is that what if this was really a medical emergency why was she going to let him go home if you just provided her phone number and that shows that there's not something in dire threat and there's no case it's a people's position that it was impractical to obtain consent given the defendant's condition which everyone testified were ever to be the case because of such a case the truth this exceptional if i recall correctly and i'm not saying that i did there was a case where there was consideration of if it is use of force in terms of the monetary damage caused by several different objects and the defendant's current break the windshield in other parts of the car the there was some testimony that one of the throws at least property and the reason was because at least one of the throws could have possibly been done in self defense and therefore the value of the damage because each stroke a different part of the consenting to treatment she said again he clenched his fists and began yelling this is not the picture of someone consenting to medical treatment and furthermore we had mr mcclellan's on her but the testimony that when he was whether what happened was the aggressor was in the defendant could be self defense all that came from the defendant's own testimony and so the defendant's own testimony here as as well as in  that the cases have held that for the emergency exception to apply expert testimony in for water but even setting that aside there was no testimony that there was an emergency or any specifics given what emergency this was
gerry's are you asking this court to hold that by the only injury limits may never be stacked or are you asking that just the civically state that this policy language is not susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation i can answer that by saying all three and resisting arrest me for the court to find as a matter of law and policy construction and tough telling the policy holding from that that there was no and stripped one from the nd to two cars and one policy so the ambiguity argument is really an alternative basis yes that we don't the statutory scheme to demonstrate that liability insurance attaches to the motor vehicle you heard that earlier as are you well you are under insured and uninsured motorist attaches to the individual what happened  the really all the test is whether or not
situation where the award is in fact at the worst for life the simplest explanation is often the best explanation the checks keep coming and the beneficiary doesn't endorsed them somebody else indoors and we don't know communication i personally don't know whether this was turned over to the the vast county state's attorney or i have had discussions with other lawyers in our office about ellison or agree and i know that there has been some issue about that the submission of the plan for death benefits from the state employee retirement system was tantamount to notifying c m s were with her in the services for the attorney representing them in the worker's compensation commission case thank you for
the proposed change actually recommended to the city not made the change of the past nevertheless the city council and the author of that matter when against that recommendation and approve the change from the residential bast the city's own comprehensive plan basically details of the framework where businesses are located along the main thoroughfares now with residential property behind this just nationally makes sense because for fabric and  and i leave the city would like to resume the problem to visit the city feels that it will be more beneficial to all over the entire area was rezoned the business of the city is very excited about the growth in the spirit and hope that will be a great asset for the entire community
the vision and distribution of the retirement plans the defined benefit plans of the parties from the second issue is the main solution if you look at the record take that into account what you just described that is that the value of the original money is greater than the value of the money put in later is just a numerical application of a formula argument but it was based on that it was use a pool for local cases that state the benchmark for returning the amount of maintenance is the recipients reasonable needs in life the standard of living a family during the marriage but this goes to the about of putting the car submitted a document showing that his child or it should be two hundred eighty dollars a week but that was earlier on in the litigation it was if you bring on
purposes and give the movie experience of course a commented on across the country in terms of the course of effect giving information i don't find information to plaintiffs in connection with on first of all the adult content
thousand for gambling in and i can promote concessions for the fixtures and things you need more than that about do in two hours i'll get you back in plenty of time we got a lot of catching up to do are you sticking together right now remember this is  you're sure because i am blind remind me to do something about him around election time so i'm afraid it'll be up to you i don't get you well think it over and you will i suggest you have a doctor take a look at that leg wearing the right clothes to go riding with that cap i wasn't quite sure what was the right thing state took a hand in straightening out this town frankly i liked your a one man attempt to clean up the tender line done me a lot of good well let how would you like to work as it's my special investigator parts to finish what i started that's about it where we began it's up to you why we both got the willies let's give this town the bows and have some fun when you stop thinking about mike he lives in a different world you wouldn't last in a week and we're both looking for the same thing we need action right now blood to sit around and mope getting fed up to another by i got a good piece of dough stashed away see the two of us can go down to florida and then when we come back this will all be over we can open again bigger and better than ever when you say i don't know what i don't think about  was my own life save every cent i had in the world how can i go back and tell my family so much but if they get ten thousand dollars i tell you mr mcglennon no respectable visitors say said miss it that's what this trying to do a clean up town i think you can tell me that might help your description of these men yes one of them has a little mustache is always well dressed and wears yellow gloves loved ye he introduced his partner as mr richards but this mr richardson looked like well he was a medium sized man about sixty dressed very fancy talk with a lot of fancy words to interest me very much what have you been up to now never you mind but there are some people who appreciate my value in a business w you're in love with a guy aren't you i said i go to florida i did not write or write don't get sore i got a couple of things to do what about my i don't know any way i can bother about that the boat sails in two hours
right like a fella see these x rays showed that fractures and contusion require a very delicate operation by a brain specialist dr on season i know of not one would be more qualified for let's get him that nothing could put me to sleep was drinking i always knew you are right guy except for your disposition
it's you may change your mind but i for the future is here can you still hear me it is unfortunate you have no longer able to speak i should be interested to hear you describe your symptoms you see you are the first man to know what i
section eight one gets in his eye on the decision as well as the order that was entered in this case and i am uncertain how the commission could rely upon  disability the first amendment the easiest argument is that the petitioner has been working as a pizza delivery person for some time the writer is undisputed in the fact that the undisputed in this case that he's been delivering pizzas for him for hours pizzeria for period of time it's not a matter of one or two hours he's you know six seven hours a day he's doing multiple days of the week he's cal disability which is any worse conversation case where there is an injury there is a permanent part of this ability something there is a permanent disability that is indicated in any cell in the workers compensation so going back to meal for there is no indication when she says that that every day working or seven hours right he said two or three days a week of the seventy eight hours a day up to people he goes in anywhere from one to three days a week and only makes deliveries when it's busy there is no evidence as to how many deliveries he makes how much money he was earning he centrally goes in and hangs out and it  they chose to use did to teach the doctor mayor ford gave her opinion regarding the permanent disability and it was the last name of treatments prior to the hearing in this case so the commission's decision
put that right away i'm do wait a minute ask comes down expect him to the precinct satisfy be just kids mischief might have led to something else then why don't you get my money because i'm a gambler all right my name doesn't have to pay attention given to it from a friend i know you don't approve of my records but don't turn down something that'll keep the kids off the streets can you take it for them you always were a good salesman but i'm afraid i can't do it just think of a punching bag boxing gloves couple showers and lockers like the kids of heels kitchen had those things very few of them i'd ever see the inside of a reformatory i guess you're speaking from the moment money i'm not speaking for the head i'm wrong about what goes on out there all right i asked you to move along move along i hope i'm wrong about a lot of things that are going through my mind about what metal plans explosions to attract attention and one spot where they operate in another doesn't mean anything to you i get it but mike don't jump to conclusions there's a and you believe this cross i believe you believe a friend guilty of murder on an anonymous note jerry jones suspected brewster was murdered who knew joe was going back that a check up
pointed out are sufficient distinguish this case from severe liars like you would it make any difference in this case if liability was an issue they awarded damages for the i could've done that think they didn't reduce the amount of the injuries related net pain and shoulder pain and there was testimony of medical testimony in that case that the link experience of pain in the shoulder was all the doctor said the heck is wrong with this guy is he trying to fake injuries and then i'll point out by the plaintiff's own attorney and it raises a very important point about this horse review of the issue presented discretionary and  really sure how the plaintiff's exhibit sixteen when it went into evidence did it have these marks on them so you're saying because it came out the jury room like this yes it
for them and you learn count yet looks like it's time to say goodbye for a while this is our last broadcast until we get together again next a very nice being with you the boys and i want to thank you for inviting us into your home and speaking of home that's just where we're going t it's an amazing things are so fantastic i can hardly believe it here it is get the pitchfork assoon as possible and i want no superficial report here to investigate this big phenomena federally we've got to find out just what makes these it couldn't be cut it could be but  thing i know i think i'm a measly sort of like to stay in that mu be what do you think i don't know i'm going to wild idea you perhaps think i'm crazy that's about this much could it be possible gentlemen this is astounding according to the analysis this much contains a potent element which is highly made to order i don't know who for but i got the ha you know the most wonderful looking man i've ever met you only think that because his true i know you love  something's gotta be done exactly like i sa whole life is wrapped up in pete i see a family man yes well like with the cash is going to be very happy you know pigs  wait a minute wait a minute i contributed something of th this ladies and gentlemen brings to a close the first broadcast from pitchfork spring with a wonderful bit of news for you we've just received word that the state legislature has voted a magnificent appropriation to make pitchforks springs the great news of america l y sending off and begging you good night during the broadcast i received a telegram from the slow packing company they want to sponsor a program you think i'm a measly polecat
surrounding the debt is there an obligation under the statute for an individual like your client to ask for verification of the fossett the statute doesn't say that the statute requires a verification have your position isn't that there's an excess charge here as i understand it your position simply is that as of five eighteen in two thousand and ten this specific amount you until we verified but that is there any language whatsoever in the statute it would suggest that this is a requirement that these be it essentially exhaustion requirement is one character question here is whether the consumer believes it's a collection activity but whether it is in fact that collection activity the purpose of the validation procedure is to benefit the consumer it's  in other words the title fees and everything else that we believed they wanted as december twentieth but jordan ruder rated his rule but the only thing that was going to be an issue was going to be attorney involvement
you know whe t mean
camera west and also you are the poor abused its discretion in denying him or interview requests because we had different testimony and different evidence produced at trial as to what the intentions were regarding with the child didn't do it was awfully different than the evidence produced a trial regarding you know what was the nature of the body in the father's child we had different testimony pull him the respondent thought richard that you know what he wants to continue to have a relationship with his father also there's a bonding is that been done by the defendants that's for that shows that you know might not be the greatest bond between the child and the father when failed to conduct and here murder i do basically saying that whenever you have a child at that age to have assessed play a right are the court always abuses its discretion when it denies it not not necessarily interest to carry on the wrong those things and the things that were outlined for responding father to do such things as the stand they abstain from drugs and alcohol get a stable living environment along the way and come in legibly and consumed alcohol i clicked on a visitation yes he got out of the evidence presented and i think you know he was clearly wrong there but i think the overall theme he had done the things necessary to create a stable environment so that are so obviously in the best interests of the minor child for him to continue to have a relationship with his father for those reasons your honor we feel that you know by you know terminating the relationship with the biological father probably also shutting his relationship in line with this other still so for those reasons you're on the circuit cour
justifying the state says well you know that person was trained to look for poking train to see if there was me at least in my adult somebody was something that person may have been framed i posit at some point she that's not sufficient to get to the point he heard of the matter of whether it all has prompted or manipulated that child into making these allegations against this girl furthermore in this case that child interview was not reported the was a year between the incident report if you look at the case it was actually involved in and out of the father and the child reported the incident one month after leaving the home so the issue is that there could have been some issues the s know the motive to distort this motive to come up with something that isn't true i'm not saying the child herself has a motive i'm thinking of possibly others in the child's household ha motive we have to definitely read between the lines to grasp that there was a pushed and some argument about how you know the question whether the child knew what i was in was which one can read that maybe someone in the household  one final point i do have no case law saying that six months per se makes for a timeframe that would render it hearsay testimony in real life i do have people versus the verse which is stated in the in the
why don't you have crazy take a look at him i think i will have the answer to a gun turning to stone i give up you'll have to leave the church three o'clock yes but i i thought you knew he disappeared when he left home early this morning and hadn't been seen since his wife was very worried and i thought you reported his absence to you the first i've heard of it are you is   fact i'd be glad to test it for you i'd rather take it with me very well you see there was a bank robbery today some strange chemical was employed everyone in the bank was transfixed frozen to the spot startled you see i work so close to the sign i have every reason to good the creation of such gas and i didn't say it was a gas what else could it be i don't know but it was a gas to you what happened to me i was standing right over there and all of a sudden i know i'm not going to tell you i'm on that what happened to you ok i was bit  you know i could be wrong mr tracy but i think that man passed me at the bank door i think he was coming out as i was going in you have to recall what time it was mr ball yes i do i looked up at the clock as i came in it was exactly ten minutes to three  and obviously this man wearing a bandit's clothes is not the band this is a drawing of the actual man would you say you think this man before mr paul i'm almost certain that's the face of the man who passed me at the back door thank you anyone else see i'm all right that's all one thing more please don't any of you discuss this case with the newspapers it's very important in fact i'd rather you didn't discuss it with anyone for a day or two and thank you again experiments or use the bird i suppose you have a gay that are sold to a gang a bank robbery what are you talking about the police are analyzing what i write that's too good for the formula  requested that i don't leave town your friend tracy tracy well i think i put that formula in the hands of time i placed it in the back myself you couldn't i had to i tell you this tracy how did you get here it was easy illegal to illegal what is my breaking into your place and searching your things without a warrant i should think so why did you do it why did you tell me i wouldn't find water in that bottle if you didn't hear a biochemist why try to pretend you didn't know what was in that bottle you forget mr tracy you taste whatever was in it not i i was so sure it wasn't water that i because i can see no reason why dr atomic would make such a substitution neither can i fact i don't think he did but obviously he had to he and i are the only two people who have a key to that plot someone else why should i try to find the kind of person who goes around healing bank robbers and murders frankly no i think you got in over your head and now you don't see any way out but lying i'm not i think you got to tell them the truth you can't do that not your dearest it's risky but perhaps we'd better leave town tonight but i thought you said you could perhaps i can find a way but you must meet me at once and talk this out that case i'll do it myself a good idea i think went wrong what good tim would never leave
you oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh me and
lie they weren't we were arguing there was substantial compliance here based on everything in this record this records really kind of one of a kind because it's clear that he knew he had his right to an attorney it's clear he should done but it didn't matter in this case if i can just go to my grief point and i swear he judges it will be very long usually lack of full compliance before a one results remand for a new trial  not here there was in essence noncompliance through here but it was a zero harm the defendant repeatedly said he want to go pro se the purpose of rule for a one a the authorities in my grief is that years no in his exact sentence and this is the fact of most in this case not just the sentence possibilities which the rule would have you know of he again chose to go pro se he also knew that by the obviously of the charges right
witnesses that have credibility with the i think the credibility is a very important part of every trial and it does not and should not be allowed to be used to let me just ask i mean the defense strategy on cross examination was to show that jones was biased and therefore she said it or least make that argument and some of this other information it was brought up with also so b story that there was no reason the probability of acquittal in this evidence had not been introduced at the second trial after all it wasn't introduced at the first trial and the defendant wasn't what the jury did not have the tools of first crowd that he needed in order to into her home to watch him around her grandchildren that she wanted to keep an eye on him if he was going to be around her grandchildren and that's an important distinction to make here and of course this evidence was intended to rebut the false impression planted on cross examination that she and allowed him to move in her into her home to rekindle a romantic relationship and this was part of the defense's strategy to show that shows love for them and then and this is from introducing the rest of the story on the same night and same is true for that for john's testimony about his old ways on cross examination she testified that after he moved back into her apartment he went but that's not unusual because after all he was living there dearth joan was living there so the idea that she could very easily