from the settlement to be negotiated by the client now by way of background prospect purchase and not request interest in the defendant's client's wrongful death but occasion to which it should be repaid out of the settlement or judgment in that action to the tune amount plus the compounded interest and so the four percent interest compounded monthly translates to what a year how much interest here i don't know off the top of my head that be exact percentage p a serious isn't it i wouldn't say so i would say that the parties i mean the contract agreed to that amount when they formulated the contract which they're free to deal under on contract rights so  that received from aspect there was no limitation on her use of that money right that is correct and we know her lawyers quote you have used either those proceeds to work up her utilize these i typically these types of funds are used for personal use as far as coming medical bills and living expenses and things of that nature during the pendency of a sale and this wasn't the first to counsel had arranged whether this pushes agreement with champix under minnesota law and prospect for passage to fail supplemental brief again this is just at the cafe consider it so that is that is the basis of saying that this was and this is a default judgment on the merits of the champion case here in illinois  salter is right housing is sued in minnesota you you send off with prospect funding all right but the two together  and there is no restriction in the agreement on how she can use that money she can use in any way she wants that's right and we don't know based on the record how she did use the f if she gave her those funds to your firm to be able to hire experts so she could hear from her wrongful death claim how is it fair that and prospect about who should get the money and your points are legitimate because she's a widow with four children and should she have to pay four hundred some percent to somebody who gave her thirty thousand dollars or twenty five thousand dollars so she could live while her lawsuit was pending those are all good arguments but you kind of acted is judge and jury and said i'm just going to give all this money to my client and nothing to talking about the letter of direction and they had not only humans in which to say this is what i'm going to do i'm going to honor this you're replicable better direction and i know understand that prospect is relying on my so you're undertaking to prospect manchester you could not you could say i have no intention of ever giving prospect any money i'll sign whatever you want but because there's no relationship between the minder and not getting any reconquering from my house from the staff we can survive and if i can't settle this case now i'm gonna be able to settle the case now and you say well gosh if we can just you can just for another year or two we can get you more money and she says i can't hold on for another year or two how is that not consideration when she says i'll take whatever they're offering right now because i she comes here to rule she's having a hard time i'm going to assume didn't get any of this money she's having a hard time making ends meet and so you say why i can set you up with somebody who can can do this and then as part of their arrangement you undertake to hold any funds that she gets and a resolution of any dispute between her and prospect and you you just disregard them and they have a hard time with th settlement involving minors just made the wrong decision approves the settlement the probate court appoints a guardian ad litem for the minors and when the settlement is approved by the law division the probably a court directs the on farms pending the outcome of that dispute i told her you could have a responsibility under an invalid agreement that's been that's been a part of the civil law for nearly a hundred years so you knew the agreement wasn't valid when and conditions in agreement and explain them to ms right house and we told you you must have told her because it's been a part of minnesota law for hundred years that you don't have the order of distribution this was a priority claim that should have been distributed prior to going to say house and her children now  authority authority to state that position and as justice nascent pointed out i only say a case not from illinois but also from minnesota and various other states around the country but i suspect spelt that only part