very familiar with the briefs we read everything we're familiar with the record and so on and you i think you if you would keep that in mind didn't and stick to the issues we would appreciate it motion for sanctions that at the time was being enjoyed twenty seven two was just being brought against myself the supreme destroyer is the earth when there's a case pending and somebody is a party and i know you're you're contending that mr stewart is not exactly a pirate in the big gets known to fans to an order of court to say well i made my own determination at the hearing didn't pertain to me personally so i'm not going to show type written over the church mice and came out with any discrepancy i think it said bear with me i'm not positive on this but it's in the transcript it's a indirect criminal complaint and one july twenty of an objection the first thing that happened was i was threatened by qwest council but they were going to sue me the second thing that happened is that i appeared in court and on the way out again  further questions we would have of course provided that information notice was sent out to the class the notice in this case was extraordinary over ninety nine percent of the class members receive direct notice and you know  note also that we're not working on a blank slate here there is a an established market pedestal of selma's under the telephone consumer protection act that information was presented to judge kennedy  and this settlement is extremely favorable on the numbers you look at the number of class members you look at the the dollar value bearing again the attorneys fees is a separate issue that my client is interested only in see settlement and there were substantial defenses that my client had to both class certification and the merits of the case there were frankly serious issues that could have prevented this quest from recovering that's not typically run because typically the quick release and see what is the reaction of the class that's one of the factors that's one of the question factors is the court needs to look at the reaction of the class over the objections typically that gets him to that final approval which is exactly what happened here quick look at those factors made very detailed findings the standard of review period or other even if you were to look at it even though the objective himself has a that struck the document from the record meaning that that that he's he's not properly before the court today all the way to trade through appeal royalists before it was stricken because of the two thirty was only subsequent months later after november the restrictor sure that that's how any that's how that's how strong the story the rest of defendant answer can be stricken after you know after they went on some claims that totally possible to vance's an unsolicited phone call doesn't result in injuring in fact even though that was said there was a credit reporting case so now you come to cook county which i guess attorney what obligation do judge kennedy had at that point absent class members just had the obligation as a few do sherry to rise in class members to ensure that the settlement was fair and significantly worse relief than in this case so cases where people were getting less money i believe it is really is a four leaf for class members is driven by the number of class members who filed claim this rate so in this case if hundred dollars claim not sold to new yet but the fine plus million dollar that the plaintiffs class council is seeking directly detracts from the amount of weak when you look at the whole thing the question is under this case where he came to the court is a done deal i am just looking at the percentage is enough and whether that passes muster or the action class i know respectfully disagree with the idea that the circuit court looked at just the percentage judge kennedy left that that that everything in the law if something happens and so when you say that without knowing the man in those cases how many years whether there is a trial how many depositions how many motions  a class representative a class council you can't look at that because they're not they're not in it and we've got people who are really invested in a case like some of the cases that that have been that this court is not that and those cases say that people people who  stand for the proposition that you can't use that evidence as long with evidence of what happened in a given case to prove that someone acted with an improper motive and in this case we had numerous times tha worked with mr bandis that we were ready to present those exhibits are in the record they're not admitted into evidence because we were not able to present them but ultimately the reason that mr that was not sanctioned is because we were unable to prove comes which means he's in bush announced his practice of law which is the second part of our cross appeal you can represent somebody in a court of the state without authorization from the illinois supreme court and and mr mr bandis did in fact to the media to do that i miss a mediator you know you start out every mediation telling the parties that this is a trap potential process that i will meet with you separately and i'm as she told me to i will not disclose to me either side what is said between you and me and i mean mr sinister bendis told him to say that that's how it was presented it was presented as she has the offer mr ban this is making ok so it was i don't think it was a breach of a motion to have mr banta sanctioned they also sought to enforce what they believed was a settlement agreement that's they brought before the circuit court judge meyerson considered rude one thirty seven described it in our papers by judge miers and not by the adelson farm and certainly there was no clear notice to mr bandis that he was being charged by the adelson for him with a violation of the only attorney say you know what will go away if you just give us kind of your feet yes so class council for excel for a couple hundred thousand dollars mr manderson mr fein are happy the objection is withdrawn traction the fees are too high and it can still be filed for an improper purpose under rule one thirty seven it i'm feeling the objection you know if you'd be assuming this case now because i really believe the fees are too high or many and do believe that these are too high but the only thing i'm going to get out of it is a cut of the fees for me th all you need to do is read judge  how minus opinion in a related case and i'm talking about the one from february sixth twenty eighteen to no dead with regard to this case