MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
exam and finally about flawed credibility analysis and internal illogic more generally and so the first argument is fairly simple t bargains opinion in record supports that there should have been psychological damage in the r f c and it was to even just to not not properly consider or explain  a please the court i'm here jeffery representing the commissioner of social security g discussed the fact that she would had a diagnosis of depression and you mentioned it several times in his decision however the evidence didn't show that depression was severe or that it caused any functional limitation simple general statement included in that checkpoint squirm and what's important to look at as far as that form is concerned is that dr john bardeen was asked whether or not muslims he would have a very specific mental functional limitation that would affect her ability to work and on a checkbox form he did not know any mental limitations so really the l j afforded dr von bargains opinion great weight and ultimately arrived twenty thirteen and twenty fourteen midterms he was demonstrating normal gait and stance she also had examinations showing false muscle strength and tone and in fact in two thousand and fifteen she attended  walking and coupled with the limitations of frequent balancing and stooping there's no inconsistency in those two limitations being put together i think it's really kind of an a misunderstanding the job numbers in this case that's directly contradicted by the evidence because the vocational expert testified to jobs that ms mc could perform and when you shift the description of those jobs you are going to require any and i just want to note that that was not no arguments regarding credibility were included in the briefing here and they are just credibility finding is supported by substantial evidence he discussed her conservative perspective treatment he  so if the court has no further questions for me i would submit that l g is the same as supported by substantial evidence and should be a fir depression a technical term in seventh circuit case law and more generally i would address some of the boilerplate regarding depression you know she deny depression in this nor in psych exam
give the i j a all of the deference that i need to if there's some standard of evidence underneath what the i j a determined why is not this one twenty two day trip to pakistan because the gesture that there's substantial evidence that this is the one day trip is just one trip twenty two days without any individual facts as to what actually will have happened if he lives there the rules and regulations which are attached to my brief clearly indicates you have to take the nancy for example would he have any chance of any future arrest as would occur in one nine hundred ninety seven when the government came back into power didn't his brother go back to pakistan yes he did and when his father died in one thousand nine hundred seven he didn't go back because he was afraid to go back and the government that persecuted him came into power are any other questions i could answer in my i believe that basically anything the judge is a something without any legal authority that a military dictatorship is a change for the better define is common sense not been away and i find that now we're looking at whether the past persecution is the sanction i guess that there will be for future persecution but in  all political activist speaks for itself the acts fits for itself and my client will be arrested if he goes back and tries to get involved in any political activity like they did were there any change circumstances presented all of these facts that  er has credibility and then one reads through the particular record and determines based on the credibility which generally when they have credibility the ability to prove past persecution is easy and reading through this there's a lot of stuff that may get to past persecution if one gets to past persecution then the threat of future persecution is automatic it comes with a because of the past persecution so then it's the government's job to come forward not the petitioners job it's the governor's it's the government's job to come forward with change circumstances ailing parent isn't going to deal with that so if i can't deal with that and all i've got is past persecution then i get a presumption of future purchase commission and then the government has to come forward and i can find the government coming forward with the country conditions that we have in this particular situation as to this particular individual we can talk about past country conditions from a long time ago or what happened then the p p p was in power
him that she confronted armando at work and that she said to him that she knew what he don't know that she knew that he had touched in these but breasts and this is a twelve year old child at that time one thing one consideration actually use was that in that case the mother approached the finding said hey sexually assaulted my daughter paraphrasing and she had three daughters with her and the defendant looked at the victim and said the victim's name and apparently he's courting that to me and implicit admission a whole and then again a rational jury could go believe term we're not saying that that it's not possible but a rational jury without the evidence of these statements also could have found that the state y accurate as time passes trial is almost two years after her interview with him you can lie in the interview with him the line is anywhere from one to two years after the initial  few quick things yeah light can be considered for consciousness of guilt but flanked is not only evidence of consciousness of guilt flight people even assume going to walk is flying too which i think is young lady was fourteen almost working years old and of course she would have been prepared by the state's attorney civil yeah you're going to expect a certain amount of consistency you want to
expenses crush should be the only remedy would be to reverse them based on what they decided and send back and tell them to do it again when the finding that easy traveling employee ended his injury rose on the course  his case ok let me get a think is that going to be your winning argument but is it your position and obviously this is maybe undecided the issue is that if he's a traveling employee and he's injured while in the course of
have a prepared statement to take five minutes that all options would be lost on terminations february second ninety ninety six after mr brokaw started work on unilaterally prepared a schedule that stated that mr brokaw would not only would not get any stock for over two years after least two areas of corporations because those refer to qualifying stock which has certain requirements but there are are also another area issuer transactions when your issuing something and so qualcomm is only giving you the law dealing with qualifying stock and not with the issuing stock which is what we're talking about it's very specific in that citation what qualcomm should be starting to work the court should be looking at is california brokaw did a great job for four and a half years and was laid off july say the seventh two thousand he's invested auctions were worth about four hundred thousand dollars those options have to be satisfied that is the corporation have his identify them and regarding california jury instruction twenty four twenty three this is the instruction for breach of implied contract of good faith and fair dealing and it specifically states that both parties to an employment relationship have a duty not to do anything t three hundred ninety of engineers under fifty seven years old therefore an engineer in a global star unit had a ten times greater chance of being laid off before the age of fifty seven a math expert declared that laying off thirteen of the seventeen workers over fifty depositions and those were not even given to the court except later on for another motion on the second only in the second deposition this case should be reviewed by using mr brokaw's complaints and decorations as truthful  to conform to the evidence mr brokaw's numerous time declaration declarations conform to the facts in the lights and support all of the causes of action regarding qualcomm's restrictive documents please turn in our one forty six lie so if you could submitted more than one thousand pages of an excerpt of record and that alone indicates that there are substantial factual disputes especially involving the intent of the parties that should be settled by the trier of fact therefore all the causes of action should be restored and i'd like to case is in many ways not remarkable the issues were raised below they were briefed below the record before your honor it is thick and wide and deep and i believe even a cursory review of the main
claimants treating doctor this is a case where the claimant apply for benefits after his insurance status fired and there were no opinions by any of the treating doctors of the time regarding  his ability to work because that wasn't an issue in the case he was seeking treatment only and there was no discussion of what his limitations were the only examining doctor to give an opinion regarding his ability claim and dr lyons certainly did that he had his colleague's records to review and case law in this circuit supports the fact that even a doctor who is giving an opinion well i think you need to needed to acknowledge that he had seen that report number one and number two dr line gave some reasons that the other revealing doctor didn't even mention articulated by the agency they were not articulated by the l j and the magistrate judge actually made his own determination of the record which we would submit was not appropriate and it would have to go back to the agency it should go back to the of my client was searching for an explanation for his problems and there was never any complete resolution even though the migraines continued throughout the entire period a four year gap but there was never a gap in treatment he didn't have cardiac treatment all the way through there was a two two and a half year period where he didn't but during that time he was treated steadily s job as a tank truck driver and unless they could show transferable skills he would have to be found disabled so all that the evidence shows is that for a couple of hours argument from the government is really necessary and then i would ask respectfully that you recess this to another time or even later today when somebody would have an op can you read the brief i couldn't find the brief that would be unfair to my colleague over here
impairment before age twenty two according to the agency and precedent deficits and adaptive functioning are not a matter of common sense but are a medical matter under the two thousand and two adaptive functioning in two thousand and seven agency examining psychologist dr henry diagnosed mild mental retardation for the purpose of the d s m which by definition carries with it of common opinion these deficits in adaptive functioning on exists in two thousand and fourteen agency examining psychologist dr hankie diagnosed mild intellectual disability which of course itself also carries necessarily an did not recognize that medical experts a medical expert dr brooks testified that mr johnson quote would probably qualify under twelve o five number four end turn the turn the inquiry here in the one about whether the petitioner here your client can just cope with the challenges of daily life i don't think nobody should be right to such novis a cursory decision alluding generally to the rote reading of the listings without a look at the actual evidence showing what he can do functionality is what matters in the disability determination what the claimant can actually do in this case we have functional capacity and then questionable creational expert and said if someone has this functional capacity is there work that this person can do and the occasional expert said yes there is work that's the standard for disability what we're what we're what it were examples of work you could do the examples of work work dishwasher i believe it was a housekeeping skills and housekeeping type job appellant disagrees and how the l g should avoid the evidence but the court should not accept the invitation to reweigh that it's and find it make a finding contrary to the l j and contrary to the district court that's not the standard said that those are that what we use to determine whether or not a claim that has deficits in a doctor function we can see here that when the when the regulations do not permit affirmative the commissioner then starts attacking the regulation as being too lenient the the fact that the agency perspective we can eliminate that should not authorize this court encourages court to reach an incorrect result in this case mr johnson overwhelming evidence shows that he met listening to all five say on this record thank you
no i'm sorry that you know that will be able to play with you boys till later this afternoon he's doing some work for me right hi i hope i never see another carly i didn't realize what i was wishing i'm sorry for everything i said can't we call the whole thing off is there anything i can do please let me take back my wish o if it wasn't for the amount of playing in the club sample combined with the spring of the rubber inside the ball that drive would have gone anywhere and all you see all spring action depends on elasticities the ability of material to return to its original form after it's one point to another and that's exactly what the spring is supposed to do transmit shock from one point to another all came up let's get on with the game you don't realize the number of springs that work for us every day why there's a of the problem of people like you guys is that just because more springs are usually hidden you some of them think of the important part they play in the regular operation and enjoyment of our cars produces just take the springs i mentioned a while ago tires the cushion springs under special springs on the car all combined to give us a ride that can't be to
disqualification order that did not leave you at liberty to continue to represent yourself or your company in china or anybody else and try to collect that judgment and that's what all of these actions are their efforts to collect a judgment when you've been disqualified from any litigation in that respect well your honor if that if i cannot get review of the issue by the sport then how can i ever challenge the validity of  you wait to the final judgment in the case in which the order was and you bring an appeal from that that is kept you can't violent the order in the meantime and that's what you've done and so right now all we have before us is whether my judgement and i used information that was a matter of public record i have a right to come into this court and protect my property  if you have any further questions i'll be glad to answer apparently not thank you thank you
oh right right in front of the well i am the bottleneck and this is the first run for the view i c c freaky five and we're really excited about it there's one hundred twelve racers there was probably thirty little kids a runner of the age of eight that ran in the half mile race we just moved here a couple months ago and i was carrying a chainsaw about about ten pounds but the worst part is i had my arm cut off and tucked into the my pants like that so that was even harder than carrying soft gave me a real appreciation for what are there and women of the armed forces  every day in the desert carrying all their equipment on in nine vermonters all rely on food stamps or some kind of help every month to get through and that number is unfortunately increas
the next case on our calendar is theodore black's jr versus some two individuals and parole officers thank you as to when the search may be conducted so i believe the effect of it is the same as the the statute in sense of the california well obviously it's not identical and we do have standard call of the parole officers today so get some standard it looks like it's pretty easy to meet my fears and standard welp that there's been no decision by this court or by the discourse in the circuit that resolves this question of whether that standard has been overruled by sampson so therefore at the very least that fans here are a target of qualified immunity i think you're right on that if we haven't done it yet if it's still in question say you're representing the police officers correct same reason i mean a director on behalf of the city defendants for the same reasons that the attorney for the pro officers are taking lated the officers are entitled to qualified immunity there's no clearly established in a parole search doesn't render the call procedures on lawful the police officers are there to provide in case something goes wrong basically and there's no reason that they would have believed this was unlawful in any way and so they're entitled to
he fell off the bench in the book in the area and so perhaps maybe you know this this is one of maybe the best reason that i can think of immediately why we should have these hearings in places like grand junction as little children and action when the court will be in recess but there will be a luncheon for those that were invited at the university center at twelve forty five and we're going to reconvene at two thirty in the meeting of the hall and take question and answers and i know students are
any did the recent case of the comp purses united states have on the viability of shoulder trevino let me ask graf you could turn the volume down a little bit we're getting a little bit of in the needs of the offense and again our position is that none of the language in twenty always raises to the level of bio based on the our that would be our same position because even if you whether the elements of the statute that do match here can be proven by reference to documents such as plea agreements indictments whatever it may be you agree with that yes and in this case if you look at this is it as a divisible statute and argue why no let's say it's doesn't categorically match why wouldn't this be a cia empty when you use a visible analysis here but when you use somebody else's social security number we're all familiar with what's happening in terms of hacking and fraud and all those kinds of things you're you expose that person to misuse of the social security number right yes sir and can that lead to additional for the aft at a bank accounts and the like it could potentially yes ok it would if having a social security number were a requirement to have a job would you not deprive someone else of a job who had a social security number no sir i don't believe how if somebody uses a and one does not and the one who gets the job is the one who's using somebody else's social security number in that example a person who had this on the social security number would be deprived of the job right well if the court my name is john connor and i'm here today on behalf of the united states attorney general in this case the board properly found that petitioners conviction for taking at the identity of another under a r s section thirteen three different intense for which a person may knowingly use another person's identity and it is any other lawful purpose to cause loss to a person or entity or took pain or continue employment and there is no indication under arizona law that the jury can disagree on the colleague's question you heard what i ask opposing counsel about the impact of the comp united states versus the common what impact if any should that have on this case in light of the fact that the board which of course  since this case was handed down do we have to send this back to the b i a to perform that analysis are can we do that ourselves since it's fairly obvious to the readers of the visible spectrum i believe this court can do was not controlling because although that case involves similar conduct and aliens use of a social security card to obtain employment the board recently found that the court's holding in that case was limited to the exemption from prosecution granted by former forty two u
well now pete is the kind of a guy that made the automobile people think  all of us are the other fellow and when we all realize that we are the other fellow to everybody else we long keep out of trouble by letting him know what we're going to do next this is the correct way to signal the other fellow that you are going to stop this is the way to signal that you're going to pull over or make a turn to the right this is the signal when you're going to turn to the left this is the way to say you are going up for an intersection this is the way to signal a fellow behind that it is safe to pass use these hand signals always show the other fellow what you're going to do next give him  the handbrake it'll save on the foot brakes as make the other fellow safe and satisfactory companion on our streets and byway
when one human being take the life of another either intentionally or through any usable carelessness in such crimes as murder or manslaughter while driving under the influence of liquor or dope the homicide squad undertakes the solution of the crime from the city should notify police still in fact the home sale of one hundred forty eight hundred forty an occupied homes where police were notified in advance not one was pregnant police women always interview girls or women who have been molested by a sex pervert the services of police women are very helpful after occasions of this nature and their careful investigations help in locating and arresting the offender don't by cooperate ambling happy go lucky citizens otherwise well respected for the card fact against and in games of chance sacrifice a large percentage of their money which then goes to line the pockets of gangsters and to finance their rack offensive magazines and prosecute the distributors of sensational publication the fourth detective division handles juvenile delinquency and several police women and counselors assist in this important resulted in convictions of the defen
we all know this man but let's call him mr any man he's been sitting at this desk for yos india the salary is not much but it's been a steady peaceful job the deal and he wants to be in it but what can he do at home he's a bit of a handy man what can he do the  you mean you retaliate well in my spare time the way they're allowed to smoke here whenever they lie the first thing he learned is how to use the the next thing he lounged is to set up a job in the light and do a bit of  those that and after three months of intensive training he's almost as quick on the practical side