strong difference of opinion i think clearly has shifted not actually started correct that's correct but she's making the argument to be she was you can't you perform the duties of the kindly being prepared being there which is a requirement hours on t v in the work day show begin at seven am and following am in court that's what it says so the collective bargaining agreement says for the time that the shift starts in the time that it ends for the collective bargaining agreement doesn't discus save life or property of another to constitute active duty so your question just a story since i don't think the legislature contemplate a situation where a firefighter should be off duty and be performing an active duty such that they would be entitled to a line of duty choice to keep her in uniform at the firehouse she made a choice to drive to work to park on a parking lot to ride for a minutes early in those choices that she made there's no rule or regulation in this record which skills and abilities essential portions in physical demands of a firefighter the things they have to do while on duty so when the tones go off and the person is on duty they have no choice but to respond they have to go and do these things they can't tell  now i can go look at the action i can take this case so chrisman i can take care of water and see if you fall in the parking lot before your shift starts or ask you some reasonable miss to get to work on time and therefore it's an active duty and i'll say this if the legislature wanted that kinds of issues yes this issue of the definition of an active duty began with a case in this court a white person is the city of aurora which was in the world police officer who slipped and fell and suffered a career end tickets and it was determined that the getting in and out of the police turn was not an active duty and this is what this court said about what the standard review for that fact pattern which is exactly this fact pattern  the i don't think your opinion is going to turn it on which to interview you know if this was if we did they know machine when but we can't today knows them so she loses i don't think that's what's going to the overarching question he makes the argument that he was not supervisors evaluating a dooney imposed her by the collective bargaining agreement and by the practice of the department and by the  his is used get into the premises at a reasonable time in order in order to accomplish the the established goal of the employer in a responsible in in tempering what's reasonable because she chose to not address it home and therefore could arrive at five to seven but she chose to leave her uniform at the firehouses that she comes presumably earlier to change and be ready there  but i don't think whether i don't think whether it's twenty minutes or five minutes to makes a material difference in the case and whether she changes at home he might make a material difference in future cases which is what counsel is saying and we do have to look at what's the impact of this supervisors and these are just coworkers these are people charged with the responsibility he is supervisor determine you are in compliance you're great you're here early all the time bethany says she must cease exploitation she's consistently here early for for work as amplified by her belly way should it says this is a good thing that you're here always early and ready for work that seems awfully soft with all due respect who is coming at the argument presented to the court this morning is that a bolingbrook firefighter who is injured on a jump call will not be covered because that firefighter should not yet undo the report he or she is reported to work early court clearly apply the stand you and the court only spent a page may and dealing with workers compensation i do want to address this issue by no means do i think this court should consider hudson cited eight or ten of those cases the suggestion that the that the how case as reverse the entire trend and holding i don't agree with you at all i think the court appropriately used these decisions as an aid in interpretation he didn't use it as a substitute for the expression language of the pension code and but of course this court isn't really reviewing the compelling and imposing a duty firefighter it's not an active duty there are many department many there are many down our state departments that don't have actual g s stand around waiting in lines or their i am on duty and half an hour early and the act is you know i presumably getting a fire truck to