are parties and that cocaine is an illegal substance in vietnam the contents of the com convention shows that cocaine is a schedule one drug the nd document is the two thousand eight hundred country records for human rights practices for two thousand  written by the u s state department bureau of democracy human rights and labor calling attention to page two thousand two hundred people who ran away from a drug rehabilitation center in two thousand and eighteen because of forced labor requiring long hours and no pay as well as being the is not independent from the vietnam can communist party evident in its criminal prosecution the page ten the issue in this case is whether or relief by the immigration judge an african for asylum or with withholding once established that it's a complete it's a group composed of members with a common immutable characteristic so what i'm sorry counsel particular social group of people who are known to abuse or be addicted to drugs whether prescribed or not and whether rehabilitated or not are likened to an alcoholic a well established to alcoholics anonymous once an alcoholic always an alcoholic in general once someone is known to be a drug user that title will follow them through their life in vietnam the result is much harsher yes mr wynn was arrested for possession of cocaine ten years ago there's no and under the agreement that the us has with vietnam my client is deported to vietnam the us government is required to give the conviction records of my my question and you're talking about cocaine so anybody who has no time to use cocaine automatically is entitle to release the country at issue is vietnam any by getting a cocaine conviction my client at the time he was placed in removal proceedings did not know that he was going to be moved to vietnam and that his record was  with respect to what constitutes abuse of the average person we view a user as someone known to be addicted to were abused drugs whether it be in the present on the past this group of people have particular r t m gives rise to at least a ten percent chance of mr well being persecuted a once a client once my client was deemed to have a drug conviction by the vietnamese government he would be too she being placed in  rehabilitation simply by providing information or the country has human rights violations due process violations him he wanted to withdraw his application however the government declined to withdraw his application he even purchased a ticket to leave but the government basically stated in addition to his religious practice that when he learned that they were the government was the u s government would provide his records he wanted to withdraw the application and leave the united states under the radar so that the vietnamese government wouldn't have his records which was cause him to have a reasonable belief that he fears the possibility of being placed in a rehabilitation chap vs not naam is a communist country the courts  are controlled by the communist government and there's no true due process for him or judicial review even though they said that they wanted to institute a judicial review they have or they haven't done the one about the way in which is was but two thousand and eighteen state department country reports know that even up until two thousand and eighteen people were being placed in these convention prohibits return of the name to a country where he will be tortured allowing them through any opportunity to have reading is required i thank you counsel mr ominous whenever you're ready book actor istic this is because what is a drug too many different people very various to many different people it could be caffeine is dumb it could be only cocaine and heroin and others any ability as a drug user is also subject to different reputations someone who has it is drugs since two thousand and three such as petitioner might not be considered a drug user by many other people because they haven't used drugs in decades placed into one of the drug rehabilitation facilit as a government points out in the scope of standard of review the court reviews for substantial evidence the necessary factual determinations underlying the legal questions of what constitutes a particular social group and whether the particular social group is immutable particular and socially it was the us government who would be directly responsible for placing him in the group vietnamese agreement that the us must turn over wins a criminal record before returning him to vietnam which we really view him as a drug user we rely on the immigration judges exercise of discretion in granting asylum and that she considered all the facts including the students criminal