record there's only two instances in which the concept of distributing in the united states is introduced both times by the government by downing who posed as the leader of wentworth by the sea in a castle hampshire and the second time was after the drugs were delivered to madrid and had been seized and just before  alone who was meeting with my gal and some other agents when they said we they were talking about the success of the shipment and they and the federal agent said and we've already distributed the drugs  t cocaine it was with me various places in europe in japan and canada and even in new hampshire at the last minute they added that so my position is that that statement by the madrid in two thousand and eleven the testimony is consistent that he changed the terms of the supply chain he changed the pricing and he changed the shipping and he changed the pricing from fifty fifty to twenty eighty and he changed the shipping to go direct to europe and if you look at its exhibits twenty eight and twenty nine which is the transcript of the march twent ocean and therefore they didn't want to go through the u s ports they are there was talk about they didn't want to go through the panama canal because there was security risks with that but they had that didn't have anything to do with their rejection of in fact the government found it superseding indictment an entire here after my client and he evidence of my client being involved in july of two thousand and twelve one month after the detroit shipment so that i submit that the native affirmatively denounce his involvement might by going to the government officials and under the circumstances here we have one of those things where practical whether or not it may not be practical but isn't that the states and the government introduced that element that there's no evidence that supports the conclusion that the conspirators wanted to use the event in baghdad the a has people to distribute their drugs to the united conspiracy was relying on any kind of distribution by the government by the a host group to support the we conclusion that it had agreed to distribute order to establish a forty one violation is just not supported by the evidence and clearly my client had no knowledge of that and the even though a conspirator can certainly be sound old with that just isn't what the conspiracy was that the conspiracy was a desire to form a long term distribution business between the charter organization and what i called the f b i organization assisting but  to operate off of that premise that i think in correct when we look at what the conspiracy really was just this year business is objective to have new shipments of drugs then i think the  i agent and he described to me this defendant role and he says the defendant's paraphrasing but he's a good guy but what's in quotes is he knows everything now that after the april two thousand and eleven meeting so when  distributorship so so it depends you know that's where the state of you comes in here that this issue was not at all raised timely in a district court and it was not raised to six months after the trial so we have to from the chopper organization so it is you know is it true that he no longer had a on the ground involvement after august two thousand living yes but there's also no one here is that he was out well either a forty six conspiracy to have had a jurisdictional nexus the fact that that occurred this leak can't be attributed to mr is to lie and simply because a coconspirator said in august of two