document he described the document as a document that advice people as to how to to evade taxes the document we exist we introduced first of all there is no indication that was the same document mr houston motor for him to at all in fact i think the well the document we introduced specifically advised people that they needed to pay their taxes that they could not use these products to debate taxes let's look at the the actual language all right ok in said they had a paragraph to talk about peak careful what you do and don't say don't drive nice flashy cars don't tell don't tell people you don't pay taxes informants are working everywhere that's it your joint pain it's sixteen seventeen and sixteen now you started out saying you wanted to talk about the brady material since things we've been talking about these from under your best evidence rule argument right in front of your brady argument to somehow oh no that's part of my best  would it be harmless if we determined that in indeed the defense ended up choosing to put the best evidence in itself to documents i believe we filed an additional three hundred eighty eight documents those were all documents that had been in the possession of the assistant u s attorney those were documents that went directly to the intent of our client some of the documents mentioned we don't know whether he said it we haven't come across any other brady material or we we don't have the record exactly what that conversation was right we have mr gore's testimony during the hearing if you would what's your very best example of something from i think there what two hundred fifty occupants that are coming in this category of information that you allege during the hearing before the district court judge exhibit number forty nine i don't have the record site right here but i can get that to the court but it talks about we had a long conversation with scott peterson over the weekend to say his distressed and disappointed in that no one has contacted him about june first really is an understatement he skims seriously considering resigning as trustee he perceives that trusting services is not going  is that he is expected to simply rubber stamp documents without concern for the content and in fact without having this information he fears that c w t c it's doing exactly what they're being accused logically inconsistent that you might have a trustee that was either a person of such good faith or such a group of such ignorance that they did not want to or think they were playing the role of a trustee dupe and also question fact true brit lacked least that some people believed it was true in other words what we're dealing with is not the reality of the fact but what the intent was what the knowledge was what the belief was the other thing that says or it is there any indication that testified significantly about trustees and what he understood they were doing i don't know that there's any reference to this particular trustee i would also note that this document was actually faxed from from one rebut to chris you spent the government's star witness the sales mr mr reebok had testified that this was all a sham and that everybody knew it was a sham this would have directly and peach the government's star always difficult after the fact i believe to say what evidence would have made a difference what evidence would that made a difference the significance of this evidence in my opinion you know as first of all when we had this it was in writing it was in the else and it w this to be a tax fraud but these written documents show is that not everybody understood it to be a tax fraud some people understood it to be a legitimate thing what does it have to do with your client the assumed assumed that there were a trustee out there who  your client in any meaningful sense what's the argument for why that's that would make the tree go all i see because the reduction testified that the trustees were not actually trustees and were not actually doing the show and i asked me to give me my best run but there's there's a significant number of them but all these documents show is that they were trustees that they were complaining that they thought that this was a legitimate thing our we did not believe that there were any trustees that believe that they were you know people who were doing the government said they were doing based on the discovery