qualified to do and they found the opinions of dr venter to be more persuasive than the opinions of dr wrote and they did not see it in their decision the reasons why they found the various opinions to be foremost among them is the representations which i believe were provided by police counsel to dr brody that she was performing seventy thousand repetitions per day and if you do the math on that i think  it our decision that's like two point four repetitions per second it's unbelievably fast and really a data ration which the which the commission thought so and this is the basis for dr robi is opinions frankly is turner if you look at dr turner's march fifteenth twenty eleven note and you'll look at then a year later it pro i'm sorry march off twenty third of twenty twelve  not know that the right hand symptoms of the left arm symptoms are new complaint his medical records state she continues to have begun both of her hands and left arm she did only focus on the main pain issue and they tend to ignore at least in the medical records about the other body parts that somebody may be complaining off with regards to the facebook polls and i would  is a gal she was working at i believe this a lot of that time before my client inquired used to called totally fit and she was not the owner and she was just a worker who would weren't there she would say yes lori smith professional would come there and hang out she never said she would run there so i don't know where exactly commission came up with the idea that she was working then we had under about a testimony both from petitioner and independent business saying she never work for you saying problems and her problems are being associated with the job that she was performing so i don't i don't believe that there is any inconsistency is and i think that is what the honorable tucker essentially noted that the commission cherry picked the fact that they ran too deep into finding that she was not credible then the arbitrator who heard her testimony who saw her testifying found her to be credi did indicate what she did did indicate the split up between her job as a cosmetologist as a nail technician he also reviewed two separate job description one that was authored by potential herself it was introduced  by the employer themselves and he said that he has reviewed the job descriptions he has an understanding of the job that she performed and there responded and and he believes that the job all the cosmetologist or a nail technician threshold of seventy thousand but how do we know that because he testified to it in different ways during his deposition as to why he believes that this lady's condition was related is that in general based on what other information that was noted by dr rody during his and next visit so he had an idea he had a lot more idea as to what she did what the breakdown was how many hours he writes what breaks then how many breaks she took the the not knowing thing about that so how are you going to rely on a repetitive pramod case where the whole point of the surgeon is to see whether the condition is related to the job duties and the surgeon did not know what she did and this sort of let me ask you point because we've been talking about and i believe your honor that commission is speculating and here's my commission is speculating because well that's a very sick man and i think he was part owner if you with the manager she was the owner's wife she was present during the time forget it by using a blow dryer i mean the commission has to use common sense once in a while and i think they did this time she gesturing you know sometimes it's creepy you get into the issues you know we i mean there's no some seventy thousand she did she actually did a number of repetitions and found her credibility because of that here i don't believe that that was the only issue they found her like and credibility and i think i believe i would disagree and i would disagree based on the fact that i don't believe that she changed i believe that i didn't ask during direct examination a lot of questions regarding her facebook pose in fact facebook post for interviews if i'm not mistaken during only cross examination so what she said all at all times was yes i would go hang out there i did occasionally pedicure or you know put a bar in care of things like that for people like me or you know some friend's daughter i did not accept any money i did accept donations in fact she was on unemployment the whole time she was not working so she was even though people are donating her because she was trying to essentially transform this salon into a sell on that she was trying to buy