mean it varies it is not at one level that it varies at the point where mr hall and was it under five as having some sort of problem were the initial drawing event was recognize court in this case this cited that there were no material facts at issue and plains as a whole and argue that there are numerous facts at issue here that relate much will facts that from a satellite image of the area where the witnesses to the event with most knowledge the jasons drew lines sees me what it points where they place so there is that in the record exact location of where the events occurred but to establish that it can be stellar had she should have been forewarned or should have known about the hazardous and through his report he establishes and in his the position he develops that there were three factors that affected the development of strong currents in that day and that in that particular area of the current so if we use the their opinion regarding that matter that would be one we have in the record is going to experts were surprised at the strength how does that help you because you're saying that the defendant should have known aware of th very strong whether or not the point nine a knot is imperatively dangerous or not compared to other values  and a we don't have that information but we do have plenty of this to more new evidence to the effect that the currents were strong and mr dorner purcell stated that they were really they had a lot of trouble trying dangerous condition you would think people would be coming out of the water saying something and then they'd be back with the weather notice from miles away and they would see what we do is evidence that they saw something or evidence that people told them judge denied your discovery so you just don't happen we don't we don't have that but we have the evidence that it was raised and the conditions according to the national weather service were less and the  were in reality your question please when you say we don't know whether we would have survived or not had they got to him sooner that's a way of saying that this case shouldn't go to the jury on whether he would have survived he got them sooner but if you had a theory that he never would have been in the water are that was in charge of taking care of attending to mr hall and his party stated that she normally would highlight the part of the document that could be interpreted as a rel that after she took the information regarding the fence the mask and a snorkel the numbers she wrote in that inventory part of the of the document she wrote george and he gave she gave it to him in order for him to sign no and she did not follow what she said was her normal procedure elysia that he signs on  the point is do not accept that he presented informed consent and that is one of the rick was its in law in puerto rico for a release away and one of the white that is that is that is provided by law it has to do so without it being contrary to public policy among all the requisites and public policy in puerto rico ten minutes from where your time oh please go to strictly go through to get the party relying on them to avoid liability the agreement exempting them from liability for negligence are not favored by the law that's public policy and the language has to be  conclusive unequivocal and the language in that in this alleged liability could not be more confusing at actually talks about negligence by other and snorkelers and as i stated earlier there is no evidence in the record that mr holland actually read the part of that compound document which has and medical history part it has a release part in very small letters and then the primary metres on less by the way if there was a question posed as to whether or not there was only record a diagram as to the incident there is not there was one point to the two the witnesses in measurements of the distance but yes there is a diagram in terms of the relative positions as indicating what happened where now so if it's three hundred meters what do you say to the proposition that the weather advisory should've released you know put a lifeguard  forecast a wide area all along the north of quarter puerto rico all the way to the virgin islands and he that is weather center well generally yes but in terms of the ocean conditions explaining yes because the balloting does not pretend to forecast the conditions in the follow me no problem we need the area and he explained why they're so vastly different north on the information that they have for gaining their particular area above and beyond what a forecast beat from from the west coast of puerto rico to the virgin islands on the northern exposed coast may say and  boat to be frank in terms of this particular bullet then the the answer to your question i don't know the weather bullet in here that one of the problems we have is to this day i still don't know where that weather bulletin came from two of the weather bullet being at the bottom it has a u r l w w w dot weather but love backslash san juan but if you access that u r l address you don't ever get to the bulletin and that was part of the part of the information at the actual perceptions of the dive masters who operate the boats because every morning before palm you know opens there are there's at least one run to take on the computer  to answer the question specifically as to whether that day that there's no evidence on the record there is no evidence on the record that as a matter of practice the problem you know island manager would assess based on the information available to him whether sites based on what's what's happening with the or what's relayed by the by the buckmaster and the ferry captains and in fact the the palomino either manager thinks that ferry on the way over so he will actually experience a when she sees holland for the st time because she felt like mother hen and she lifted her head above the water she looked at the group saw mr hall and he sees him calm treading water looking about i mean i'm not rushing not struggling just calm treading water and in fact she was asked hey it will be well she was asked were there any conditions in the ocean that prevented you from from from staying afloat that were in a ways breaking all over you a current when you wonder she said no without any conditions that lead you to believe you should turn back considering you had two minors with you know so not only did none of the other a smart people who rented snorkeling gear that they ever mentioned anything not even the people in dr hans a group reported trouble along the snorkeling i know my fam is up but if there are any further questions i'll be happy to take  looked like it was a problem in instead you're left with saying there's this weather advisory for a general area vote wash post and that it somehow was producing something that elicited no  on that date was absent and therefore the the substitute stephen moore alice was asked about about one word the parameters he followed in order to raise a flag or not he didn't know he did not know so there was a