MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
this case represents an issue that has never actually been dealt with by the court namely whether or not you can get a second bite at the apple as it were as characterized by the responde not discussed at all anything involving constitutional issues not as to how the case was handled by the immigration law and it didn't even go into the issue of hardship which is one of the issues that was raised here by the respond clearly allows for review in a hideous proceeding these types of issues and i would also mention that the court came down with a decision just very r i think that if we look at it in context of this new case that just came down from the circuit your honor i believe that even the issue of hardship is reviewable for two reasons one because the court pointed out that the issue of discretion was a separate issue the issue here was whether or not she had a four figure fury the issue of discretion had something to do with the fact that at that moment in time the board of immigration appeals had not yet decided ultimately did d be seeking any sort of temporary stay concerning a medical condition that's not something that is appropriate havey is action and in fact the the bureau show stays of of of a legal removal order and by section twelve fifty two g b and is it simply not the proper forum to consider an ongoing medical medical condition instead of the the bureau due process violation here fifty two they will submit her have an answer of hardship but beyond that there can be no prejudice because she does not meet the more basic requirement eligibility requirements for seven years continuously rule on this issue so therefore once there is a room by the district court judge it would be clear that that ruling is if you will by the court how did judge determined that ruling how the judge made a decision might be
the notice was not timely received if you if there is no evidence before us to fact up that legal theory why should we even give you an evidentiary hearing on that point  removal was the denial of the previous decision of the board which was denial the motion to reopen it was filed by the stationary because the petitioners apparently don't know when they received this denial motion to reopen four sixty nine and thirty eight sixty three saying if that's the case we're talking about here which was just decided last november in that case that was not only a motion reopen filed with a motion reissued but there was a sworn affidavit giving some semblance of facts to to this motion in our case all we have is the bald allegation of counsel that actually it makes no allegation of error on the board's part or anybody else's part it basically just administratively requests every issuance of a decision that had been formally issued so to say that rebut the presumption of regular delivery by the post office which we don't have here so if we even use salt and some of our reliance alter there is a presumption maybe not as strong as if it was by certified
therefore we can't conclusively say it was blood but this type of evidence was clearly enough for a jury to examine the credibility of the defendant the credibility of so witnesses and come to the conclusion that this is by these minor
what makes the battle this is what it takes to make a battle these are american supplies out of the factories foundries mines harvested from the soil pouring in from all sections all states from the e midwest and the west supplies equipment weapons made with one purpose and one purpose only the use of the factors take them away destroy them diminish them in number or quality fail to replace them in time first the soldier and then the nation faces defeat destruction death without no battle is possible you of the millions of workers men and women young and all high school kids and grandmothers democrats and republicans protestants catholics and jews white and call on you to make them know our land and sea based bombers blasted the outer island this was the first battle mission for many of these aircraft carriers but our latest tactic depended on the planet on their softening the blow this was the jig was obviously up on royce germans would have quit right away but japs are just they can't find wreckage and took potshots they dug into the ground like grass there's a matter of finding out where they were hiding and blowing them apart with bangalore's and grenade while marines were organizing a supply dumps here a draw in a more the seventh infantry were riding in for the kill fifty miles south price for your lane was a bigger island than royer no more more powerfully defense it was harder was the same kind of dirty business poking and burning and blasting him out dead or alive only it was coming out of ten thousand japs only two hundred sixty four surrendered when they did they came this jap made signs indicating that there were ten other imperial marines still living in that bill by we can blame them much for not believing what the loudspeaker was telling them that we treat them fairly under the rules of the geneva convention like i was not some of them believe that japan was going to take a piece in the white house you would hardly expect him to believe the truth when he voted or even when he saw it as we fixed up the woman the stalin and human beings were in terror that they receive the same fate they had given our boys at the time instead we gave them cigarettes cold and water saw the record shows who saw we just happen to be civilized that's the difference we told you to remember those hang on this is what it took to make a battle burned twisted broken equipment stuff made for battle and destroyed  you've got to be able to lose and lose it all make it all again keep on making it no matter what so that last that final gap pillboxes five feet of concrete it took sixteen inches of and this and realization of our dreams each of us must seek incessantly for ways and means by which the back of our service to our country maybe i'm at right now we can do so by flying fox let's make this particular victory a quick and
yes this is it my hometown the place we as members of this community call home and from time to time leave it for elsewhere this is home sweet home to us they say every town has its main street well this is ours we built it with the civic pride and remain proud of its dignity and friendly and tolerable characters we feel safe and i'm very proud of our municipal government for all through this forest our town is kept in order and we are protected from unlawful and disrupting influences it's a mighty good feeling to know that they are always on the job to make our town good place in which to live the fathers and mothers in our home town or just plain nice living folks the kind you read about in storybooks you know main street folks who say hello nice morning even when it rains on mondays you see we really are the folks folks in other nations would like to change places with these civic minded familiar faces we all know in my hometown think our town has something to shout about  let's go call on some of our business firms and see what they're doing to help make our lives more pleasant let's see how they work to give us the best the markets have to offer their purposes to please you to fulfill your desires needs to keep you well dressed to keep your homes well furnished so that you may maintain your place in society they're always there to greet you with a friendly smile and give you the best possible service you have the assurance of their dependability because they are run of us in the permanence of our community i'm standing for the many achievements and the record of service to this community the business man made a life for him on the small retailer they are the folks that fulfill a very definite for the privilege of serving the consumer whether a substantial portion opt taxes which the city uses to provide the various services which all citizens enjoy to my chin to help sin number of families that make possible them a livelihood they help make your life easier your home life happier and your recreation more enjoyable by sending you better as a seven mind a status and you owe it to yourself thank your family and to this community to favor your home town much and money spent in town works for you as well as the community below while by home and derives the satisfaction that comes from doing things the right way our service clubs might well be called the backbone of our town for it's through them that our business and social activities are welded together they are noble and unselfish efforts are aimed at making ours a better town in which to live through these clubs many a good deed has been bestowed upon our fellow man we are proud of our excellent schools that provide for the education of our children proud of their part in preparing our youth to face the future our schools are properly organized with able staff educators to guide and help these future young men and young women tomorrow someone once said cleanliness is next to godliness well here godliness is a very definite part of our daily lives the characters may vary as to color or size but never in the fervor and sincere worship of their members
without any rejection and prior our examiner williams approved all of these claims while contemporaneously it was rejecting the claims for the same invention  within a month that it had made a mistake and it would be necessary for him to seek an interference result issue a priority of invention and that is th being supported by the original disclosure in cochran's grace that issue is very thoroughly discussed and we believe and submit to this court that the use of  is clearly supported by cochran's disclosure going back to his priority applications and case walk supports no there was a phrase was not exactly in the original application  the the objective the objective evidence is the recognition of this corrosion problem as early as the date of the route twenty that cochrane contended there was long need we are simply identifying there was a problem and the problem continued and continued then then the next and very important on one matter what would be the standard for examination would it be under the case law and precedent prior to k s r or would it be decided later this is an important distinction the court may be interested in about a
what you're asking us on collateral review to evaluate whether there was a foundational basis for the expert's opinion  any unprofessional error or prejudice fair from the reason the trial counsel and this is a very important distinction did not call an expert was not because he had the state misunderstanding of law as to mr canal oh he testified at the calling the expert under the first victim was because as he testified i felt after consulting with that expert extensively i had sufficient firepower and information from the experts total edge that is a clearly reasonable objective trial strategy and as for the prejudice pronk there could be no grounds or possible error there because this expert it was simply an impeachment cross examination strategy this was not a case where the expert had some new theory or some alternative facts for the defense would have presented all he did was exactly what trial counsel did which was to impeach or attempt to impeach the people's expert the fact of the people's expert then didn't say on the stand oh you're right i made mistakes that's not the standard because the supreme court has said a reasonable trial attorney could elect to decline to call an expert even if it would help defense along that was objective lee reasonable and here as this  last year we can speculate on what a jury would have thought about the expert and a very high deputy standards as long as reasonable jurors could disagree about their rightness or wrongness of the court's decision there's no grounds for a no issue
three men on the job completed right gets to the soldier on time if number one man is on the job but number two man is that then number  number one front assembling the rifle isn't possible soldiers kept waiting too long that's why our workers consider themselves part of a team and they're on the job every day making weapons but american these are the children of america the real wealth of the nation as more and more women go into our factories the problem of caring for these children is studied by local communities as well as state and federal officials  these cases are not typical children left in parked cars when motion picture th a normal home is the only place but the normal child juvenile delinquency existed before the war children left of themselves to roam to the streets become a community problem very throughout the country therefore it is a local community which can best blend with the care of its children abiding entertaining and helpful occupations for the after school hours it's part of this plan boys and girls are taken off the street for children under school age many communities have found the answer in all day care these can be provided by nurseries conveniently located where mothers on their way to factories can leave their children and pick them up on their way home as part of the softening up of germany the british bomber command launched a thousand plane raid on the north on the night of june twenty sixth nineteen forty two but several days preceding the raid an increasing number o as the spring night closes and the men pile out of the ready room and into the buses that will take them to the field as far as is humanly possible the men and the machines have been prepared for any eventuality  from eight to ten tons of bombs are carried in the bombays of each plane experiences prove that this year wakes up a thousand planes over a target no matter how heavily defended can saturate those defenses and that the taking off at the same time from dozens of widely dispersed fields all over england they must arrive over the objective
levels so i think first the state court first leftist conclusions are simply not supported by the records and to that extent the state courts findings from findings of fact rather reasonable i think if there was in the record there's nothing that indicates the lawyer made a tactical decision i think this is also where it's clearly contrary you could not say that there was a tactical decision where there's nothing to show that there was a reasonable investigation but stric this case the petition is untimely under the federal statute limitations of this court and its original opinion on the first appeal found that the opinion was untimely then in light of the our choose case reconsider that opinion and found that because of the nine hundred ninety seven state clarke collateral challenge there was statutory tolling the supreme court now has reversed this court's decision on that particular issue and under pa what's different from your point of view here from the normal course where we take an issue like equitable tolling the district court didn't address it and we send it back and district court looks at it first matter that the intervening decision by the u s supreme court in pace circumvents or is an exception to the law of the case and that's why a lot of the case has not bar consideration of the timeliness of the petition that puts  filed a petition at that time raising the claim in federal court he chose not to do so he chose to wait and file to untimely petitions in state court file a third time or actually is forced on timely petition in state court and then come to questions regarding that substantive claim of ineffective assistance of counsel but we would argue that the petition itself has untimely and therefore no relief is available
really don't have to use all your time
all things weren't what bill had hoped for in more ways than one brother was still in china what a deal what goes on here bill was wondering to he believed in the war as a great struggle against the enemies of the common people but he was finding out now that not all his enemies were on the axis side strange facts about the war were coming out fight on the king's side against the people diversion of aid army units to meet the political crisis in greece disrupted our plans the germans had time to reset and strengthen their forces american lives were sacrificed to pay for a great government the people didn't want seems quite normal to congress roosevelt old enemies are again making government policy they are the friends of big business the men who believe in the atomic diplomacy the president himself shared the platform on the american university with winston churchill when he called for an anglo american alliance against russia is this what millions of men died for bill walked on the picket line the morning of january fifteenth he was fighting for the decent standard of living that roosevelt had pledged in the economic bill of rights the right to a job to food and clothing to fair prices to protection against monopolies the right to a decent home medical care a good education the right to economic security bill fought for this new bill of rights that's part of my d c i all the struggle against the economic massachusetts where the mayor suttle letter to g i have talked personally with many of the workers i have listened to their argument and i must say that their demands be reasonable and just under all present day this was something new for a ged adequate buying power is necessary to sustain the business life of the community to enable property owners to pay taxes to enable the city to conduct its municipal government on the basis of sovereignty and servi that use that radio record and sound from the you tube it's the companies at their own game the people could not be divided the union could not be isolated it's like name of all in on it leads to violence as in the case will follow in philadelphia on march fourth and i'm one of concentration a police shot of the peaceful picketing and parading of you the members an injunction had been granted against picketing the company thought it had won a major step towards breaking the strike locals in philadelphia and can organize a protest parade excuse that the police lost their head they certainly lost them in an organized manner this is the result of having irresponsible officials in the city hall the state capital and in washington when violence failed the companies gave them big business was stopped the strikes were won on the contracts for safe  with this congress reelected we'll have a company country with company housing company story company and company discrimination we'll have unemployment that  war abroad there is only one answer vote and vote right canvassing registering voting the stained organized effort of every local in its prosperity and even peace of depend upon it but behind the ballot is a person a woman a man bill turner went to town to say the it was little help
election you have any preference of candidate or thoughts about policy or anything like that i like bernie sanders i personally i'm honestly terrified i think this country is falling apart so i guess we'll see what happens it's looking would you completely rule out don't yes i'm very concerned about the likelihood of some distance from winning and i think his lack of experience and his details on what few programs he mentions are a big problem we don't want him to get into office and then discover what his plans that i am i think she has a lot of experience and that she is very level headed and i think th a much better alternative than donald trump i was unable to vote for hillary in two thousand and eight and i have regretted it ever since the she was my first choice i'm very pro choice and i'm glad that she is  equally pro choice following it pretty closely you know little salute to all the candidates and while i think the democratic candidates are definitely more sympathetic to minorities and certainly say a lot of things that is making it a lot more difficult for them to hire people stay where they are in fact some of them leave the country to move or seize because it's cheaper to run a business there than us obviously not what our country's founded the land of opportunity pivoting to another kind of social issue going on as you know right now in the united states with the orlando shooting with other mass shootings there's a big call for gun control what are your thoughts on gun control and i think  sing a temporary ban on muslim immigrants from countries that have been known to harbor certain terrorists what do you think of this proposed ban i think it's terrible i think that skating all muslims with the same very broad i think the pressure was very wrong terrorism do you think that if a muslim immigrant trying to enter the country has a family member or close relative that is connected with isis that person should be banned from entering the country even if they're not connected with terrorism themselves o that they voted to leave and they want another vote because they regret it that that isn't a well informed populace a lot of people have been comparing the exit of great britain from the e u to people supporting trump in the united states and it's less about policy issues and more about kind of go against the status quo going against political systems do you think that that is part of the appeal of trump in the united states almost assuredly yes definitely it could have been smarter to new set as a leverage to achieve some of the things they want to do something frankly speaking i have a country and it was her dream to leave here and to be useful there and she said that because of this situation now she says she feel has she feel that she is not useful here anymore and
you have a case then you should really find helpful persecuted in his home country this is a higher standard than for with for them for asylum this court has furthermore held that a non citizens ability to remain in a country of removal for many years after experiencing harm undermines his ability to show a clear probability of future persecution that is exactly what happened here the petitioner testified that he was stabbed in one thousand nine hundred and ninety five he then remained in mexico for seven years without experiencing any additional harm under this course case law this undermines his ability to establish a clear probability of future persecution  to the extent that the petitioner argues that he that remained is necessary because the immigration judge spoke and made a straight of notice of the fact that the knights templar very hysteric he fails to show that he was prejudiced by the immigration judge decision to do so because the poor board did not rely on this fact in affirming the immigration judges clear probability of determination did not best because his notice to appear did not include the location of the address of the immigration court however this court determined in aguilar and that that this does not they've asked an immigration court of jurisdiction looking for a nexis looking at the nexus of his proposed social group of former police officers and as agency found when we're looking at next as the critical question underlies back horizon is motive there's no evidence in the record that the assaulters were motivated by the fact he was a police officer and critically the connection is even more attenuated for his former police officer status which would be relevant for his future persecution claim critically under the substantial evidence standard if the petitioners burden to show evidence that the record compels the reversal of the agency's notifiable here there's there's no evidence to compel that finding based he would be charged in the future because he is a former police officer the only evidence we have is that when he was attacked this alters specifically communicated that they were doing so because of his refusal to work for th