allegiance to a definition of a word in this case the word is on reservation this question because of the the government has terminated the contract for convenience and  why doesn't that render this up for the reasons that we briefed before there is a collateral damage question which is still before this court which is that the action the s b a is actions in this instance resulted in that in the removal of veterans contract b c g from the v i p database that was the first instance why were here in the first place that's why it's not moot the second reason is and well isn't it premature to determine what that new standards are going to be until it's actually applied in the context of a new qualification of a new were challenging the award is because there's nothing we can't reinstate the contract i mean if we reinstated a contract it would be to your adversary we get you know kick them out reopen schools taishan we can't do any of that kind of relief you preserve any of this where did you make it into these arguments and your response to the government's motion to dismiss as moot we already know this is the first time i'm hearing that you're damaged because you had attorneys fees when did you make a request for world sperling based on this work which standard and that that issue has not been that issue has not been interviewed and we're going to read with you on that i think it seems like the government agrees because they've changed the standard what's the actual release that results from that conclusion well i don't know if it would i don't believe that would fall within the purview of this court but if there's if our arguments are correct and that the reason for the record standard being wrong was constitutional then i think that opens the door for lots of other types claims doesn't have freestanding it may have ended but the contracts been cancelled and you have not stated in any clear way what kind of monetary relief or otherwise injunctive relief and the typical that protest and response to the cancellation of the contract contract for v a buildings that there was a large increase in a specified as found in the buildings in the change was large enough to make a modification out of scope of the original contract at the time that she first the germination convenience contract with issued approximately sixteen percent of the contract had been completed and that was primarily site work and the agency's plan going forward is to resell licit this as part of a combined whether they would have a sufficient number of better known small businesses at the time and again if the the v a and for me the s b a as regulations at thirteen c f r one twenty five point thirty would permit veterans contracting group to go back before the s b a and explain why it should be eligible to be a service disabled veteran own small business and that would be decided under the new standards based on the regulations that were effective as of october first when your honor in terms of i don't know if the court has any other questions the in terms of that a bit prep and proposal costs  complaint which is unfortunately not part of the appendix never asked for a bit prep and proposal costs it said award b c g attorney fees and expenses so bad prep and proposal costs have never been a part of this again to the extent attorney's fees would not that i'm not that i have off the top of my head your honor again we would we would submit that if there is no jurisdiction then the court cannot address that question again there's just simply no there's no competitive injury to be remedied by the court that keeps us from being moved it can't in our view of the world simply go back and so what is going to rule change we can go back in the salmon and sort of ourselves as in the studio as female and if it's not able to do that it wasn't it's on able to compete or asking us to issue a declaratory judgment to that's the way to correct its database no it's not it's the air officers determination was that not just i don't i frankly have no idea what you're talking about are you saying