is in charge of signing their complaint and leading her complaint is a did to be false it's admitted to be first that the date was wrong it's admitted to be fast and that she didn't go back to work there after although she and there's no reason why she couldn't get it right the first time there's absolutely no reason and with you rather says that's confusion she could be confused the first time or anybody can be confused when you swear it's something it's more when you're not  yet what you're saying is if i sign a contract to buy a house and i put down i want to buy for two hundred forty thousand dollars and later i said i made a mistake i really only want to offer you one hundred forty thousand dollars and the other side says  claiming assert the status as a last or are you can't demand his status after that matter is gone forward but a date is not equivalent to those two things i think could be easily mistaken because you know you said it was the sure he a few days later he complained that sun comes in and christen chairs around the restaurant to the bar and as plain says he's a teenager he acted a fool it has to be about i would feel the sexual harassment not somebody tell you about the sexual harassment and here at me let me ask you this less assume that everything you say about the hearsay it's true is and enough for us t yasuko his actions as communicating something about what may have happened earlier i think the hearing officer used his actions as an indication that something had happened earlier why is it that communicating that very same  position to be communicative it has to be deliberate of communicative what does that mean which means that it has to be intended to make a statement rather than just incidentally revealing the mental state of the person who's out of that issue the second point i would make occurred but she realized that she just wasn't comfortable at work and then the next morning she appeared to announce her resignation so while she did return to work on f i d i think it's clear that what she meant was that because of this incident she couldn't case already decided but what did the other case base its decision on and it becomes up a circle that really ends up showing no real authorization i thin d there are problems with the gentleman exercise of the commission their commissions freshens or you know when when when when the law says you know the the remedies listed here are non exclusive it generally refers to you know some sort of modification or some sort of creative remedy that might fit the facts that the case brings before it it would have been a simple matter for the of cook county to desire permissible and it would have been an easy thing to do and yet they didn't do it so it's not as if you know it was something that was totally beyond their it maybe was totally beyond what they were th punitive damages so let me get this right you're saying that the ordinance changes according to the employment law that is totally is progressing in common law in illinois so that in fact mistaken about they say it's an ordinary thing it was when i split when i signed the sworn document i make sure that everything in there is correct when i have my clients with an affidavit they can't with that's because you're a good lawyer but the