good afternoon everyone in our session today there are six cases on the calendar before the panel two of the six cases however are being submitted on the briefs i would just note those two cases for the record the first one is number zero six dash seven two zero four vs the department of veterans affairs and the second one is number zero six dash three three one seven most versus the department of the navy again those two cases are being submitted on the bricks the first case in which will he oral argument today is number zero six dash one zero nine one quick view system versus bellow interacted with a chance  planes containing the transitional race prize but we certainly you're certainly correct that it was jan the case of said that and held that in various settings but don't you really have to look at each particular patent and specification to determine whether that rule is going to apply in other words because one thing i don't think and correct me if you think i'm wrong i don't think that it's a rule of universal ironclad application well i believe the the convention doesn't use the internet so if you took this claim twenty six and you substituted the word internet her computer would decline make any sense that if it does you live to the internet in terms of just that other types of communication systems and interfacing systems in order to connect or interconnected different complements of the distributed computer system th invention is used with the internet that's not the case right the well the different functions of it's our contention that it's a good chance that the different step find support for that kind of an expansive construction in the written description clearly the written description provides the basis for the district court's conclusion that the claim computer or peter using the phrase interactive data entry computer system which i believe gives support for a broader understanding of the term computer eight q further in the description type of installation that still that doesn't talk about a network i mean even given your comment about the internet which i'm not sure is accurate but just accepting it as as valid nonetheless there is here i ply no discussion whatsoever in the written description that suggests any use of this invention in any context other nystrom versus tracks if you if you you want us to construe the claim broadly you've got to find some broader support for that in the intrinsic record and that's the that's the other reason why  excel which talks about requiring the process to be performed a computer with a data display screen plain twenty six also talks about the data display screen throughout flint that talks about a singular  eating definite article came afterwards which makes sense because it's what follows is what is open ended but that will comes before but even if that were the case in this case that general rule should apply because construction and then to the general rule of law comprising just help them and when you get to the specification i think it's clear that specification talks only about a single execute in this this invention and i think also important is that in describing one important data into the computer there's no discussion in that part of the specification about a communication going on between two computers so so that kind of doesn't speak of a process being performed in a in more than one network and in fact the two ninety four paths cited uses age of the term a computer only in the singular sense and expressly distinguishes a process in that case using a computer from a network of multiple computers  single computer and then when they want their invention to apply to a network they say network or at least they use multiple things in their phraseology and the other tabs are similarly actually they don't mention your computer don't discussable when they do distinguish between a centralized computer or multiple independent processors or computers in the world they never use the word computer to mean one more any of that prior art and so that the intrinsic