to august first let me just briefly explain why we are continuing it we are continuing it because there are a number of issues to be resolved it became clear could not relating to the traffic study we provided there was a request for a waiver on the sun and because this case has come to also looking at a traffic study which assumes either a family sound restaurant or a dunkin donuts those were to be become the retail and the parking being provided two pieces of evidence would somehow create an expectation of a parking waiver down the road that's one of the issues there are a number of others the town council has been unavailable but we will get these result these questions resolved and shared with the applicant before august first assuming i have a motion to continue the hearing on three forty four loser i was originally heading to say and august first looks like quite a full agenda but geoffrey willett has just informed me it's somewhat impact on the current landscape was to get a better sense based on the documents that had been provided so we could really get a sense of what kind of screening we would see based on what  current plan the proposed driveway and parking spaces and to killer so that we could have commerce and hopefully a productive conversations evening about what we would like to see and revise landscape plan things for so i think a sense of what track pattern looks like when we talk about pick up and drop off and we're all these things how we have three points on campus so the red lines are the traffic updates pulling through campus around the still december i mean below substantially tied to the weather in the early to mid spring and project at the end of next summer all of which is predicated on september start this year the low fifty's and there is adequate parking in some ranger county that number of workers commute workers commuting to the site at the same time some other highlights of parking so it works on the parking flow of traffic through campus here in our intent is to minimize our in and out of the campus from the town street and to minimise our interaction with the dome of these go up and drop off operation so over the disk of the seven hundred fifty foot distance of the driveway we're currently proposing to remove sixty six trees however thirty four of those are either dead dying meaning or normally names so  plan we did after landing along the entire buffer as part of that previously so one of the things that we were asked to look at in our meeting on monday with the working group was other opportunities to make some adjustments side of the driveway with the opportunity of potentially saving some additional just trees one thing to note is that this is a really dense heavily wooded area that exists today question of pain your respect to residents and families who came on board and made that place what it is that day and for those who long to mourn with respectfully to the planning board the concerns raised in this case shared interest to ensure that the town continues to offer outstanding educational opportunities to our children don't want has excellent public schools and also fear you very well the building landscaping and location of the dumpster some neighbors have complained that the school has been unwilling to engage in dialogue or make compromise this could not be further from the truth compromises have been made virtually dialogue with the cemetery which in the run special consideration of funeral services has been offered among other things these compromises have been made by the school in response to she raised by a reason why more meetings and by think it's important for us  improved they're going to be weakened or even more to the point they will need to be removed understood but also knowing the the the visual the static will be significantly disturb certainly that their decision histories despite the fact that they're invasive that would help in terms of my consideration in terms of looking at whether or not  concern i think we all understand the importance of fire access to this new site on the other hand i find no positive benefit from the seventeen spaces that are posed on the roadway itself and i think in fact those faces will become places where a car people are getting in and out of cars all day maybe in even into the evening and i think given the total number of parking spaces on the day school side i don't think these seventeen spaces are critical and i would much prefer proving a plan that did not have any aspect i think we have a long long way to go on the landscape what we have now essentially is a row of trees on one side of the road and a row of trees on the other side of the road and i think if you go today to the cemetery you cannot see a thing from the matter if you walk down to the stone wall you can't see anything it's totally grown and i understand that will change but i think that there needs to be a significant investment in landscaping in order to justify a drastic change that will be brought about by putting in this emergency access so i think that it would be possible to prove that the emergency access road but not excel what we've seen so far of the road on comments that have been stated tonight i do think that we need to be in a position to offer very concrete suggestions so that when  w our next hearing on this matter we are looking at your final if not final plans i guess i guess from my point of view i think that's t and i personally have made her up with him tonight but plans that they have out there i do believe that the buffer on each side of the property line should then i'd like to see a ten foot buffer on the property line of those seven terry probably live side which i do think will allow for staggered planting the opportunity to how more robust screen to the proposed between the proposed driveway and the cemetery ok to be able to come back with a plan that reflects the sensing understand not approval of the board but i don't want to get a position when they come back next time we have had coming from people who from the from residents that they would like to see the road tried as an emergency access only and change that only if  turns out to be a serious problem i think that's it's highly unlikely if we start out saying that's an access road and it's a one way loop and one once that happens some of the residents of the area said you feel like that's an unnecessary and more dangerous approach than the current situation and i think we've heard from both sides and i don't know if you know we've actually tried i have personally have not tried to look at the numbers and say if you have x come x parents driving in the morning and driving out of the afternoon is that better and safer than the current situation well we are we are going to have construction crews using those from now till next it is while you're away so i think it's really important for us to figure out you know is it that you got a plan on monday morning and look at it before you put out the town or whether you're able to look at it later at a town i think we need to get the upper end of the option three of us on august first or four of us was the get closer to the certificate of occupancy the draft that we had here was you know no work should be permitted on sunday you know sunday thinking about the ongoing communication and i know that there is talk about some sort of a communication plan with the cemetery commission so presumably there will be people who would plan potenti first that's a really important thing and to encourage ongoing dialogue and communications i think i can say on that one i do appreciate that at this point in time you are willing to