MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
fifty fifty years old and she's been living in the united states for thirty years as united states that some children marry hasn't disabled well she came here in one nine hundred seventy four and explained detention until ninety four where she was caught with false documentation and then she was once more scraped and she was finally found in ten days later she was married it doesn't strike me that that she has been someone who's been out front with her that you're painting her we have a person who's been in the united states illegally for a long period of time and the question is whether or not the due process or equal protection clause allows a different type of proceeding against such a person is and that's we haven't is bringing up the blue fin versus the deportation that's the issue we have is i'm sorry you need to explain why someone comes into the country illegally they get matched united states citizen prior to april thirtieth two thousand and one the section two forty five respond just as well as to this question earlier and that is to present to this a petition to the district director knowing that she just married him right after she was placed in proceedings and exclusion proceedings the district director in his decision that is part of the experts district director turns around and interviews or recognizes she's been here for a very long period of time recognizes that relationship with that disabled man her husband now has been it's a bona fide relationship he turns around and approves of these petitions that approval we're still back where we were and congress did that they didn't do it because we told them to that was their idea but you know the basis of your argument is that it's a violation of the constitution to have separate proceedings which are exclusion and the importation we have given pretty much carte blanche to the congress on term making these determinations what's your best case that it's a violation of the that and the end of based on the constitution that's your position i think that in that situation here for the remedy you know we go to the medicine cabinet and pick up once at end of the stick you pick up the other and i'm just wondering if if you are really asserting to us that we as the panel should hold an constitutionally unconstitutional a distinction between exclusion and deportation i think today your honor we may have to take that leap of faith and we may have to do it because it's the right thing to do and it is wrong for us to continue to perpetuate an injustice is it again do it just because we think it's deportation proceedings were not allowed to apply for and recognizing this longstanding distinction between aliens and proceedings and aliens in deportation proceedings the court will see that on that basis here we have the complete opposite of the there's no there's no evidence whatsoever in the record i don't believe that information appears anywhere i do know that at the time of the hearing before the immigration judge the district director had not yet ruled on the application
america ok well you're on the and this is this the in indianapolis indiana and i thank you thank you thank you  thank you your honor may i please the court holly smith on behalf of the attorney general the agency acted well within its considerable discretion in denying petitioners request for a continuance where he failed to show that require due cause given that he was not the beneficiary of even a pending visa petition before the united states citizenship and immigration services was he represented at any time yes he was your honor he was represented represented throughout proceedings by the same attorney law firm first petition received to the notice of intent to deny from us c i s prepared their response along with petitioners wife and then proceeded into the removal proceedings that were initiated by the department of homeland security through upper titian as arguments he first makes a appoint of something that was referenced by your honour's his detention it's important here to focus on the timeline his detention did not keep him from filing in either  appeal which he had met and concedes before the agency that he chose not to do it also did not keep him from filing a second petition before he appeared before the immigration judge he was taken into detention at the time of his hearing on the first immediate relative visa petition in october two thousand and eleven he was detained following that interview and the notice of intent to deny was issued to his wife who was the petitioner for the  during that detention however approximately three weeks after that notice of intent to deny during the time that he still had to prepare his response to that notice he was released from detention and he was not in detention throughout any appeal period he would have had after the denial in september two thousand and twelve so that did not impact his ability through counsel to challenge initially and he didn't have a first petition the fact the dispositive fact upon which the agency relied in this case to deny petitioners continuance was that he did not have a pending these a petition the government is unaware of any case law from either the board of immigration appeals or this court that says is an abuse of discretion to deny a continuance request where there is no pending visa petition petition or made the comment in briefing that the filing of the second petition which approximately ten months had elapsed from the  hour the first until he appeared before an immigration judge he said that that filing was imminent however i cannot find any case law that says an imminent filing means that the visa petition is pending or that is an abuse of discretion to deny based on an allegation of any imminent filing the dispositive fact here is that there was no pending visa petition thus petitioner could not meet the threshold for adjustment of status he could not show  satisfy the focus of the inquiry as laid out and has me for a continuance that he would ultimately succeed in any manner on an adjustment application therefore the agency acted within its considerable discretion and properly deny his
of business which is selling my conductor parts and making them and they have subsidiary in singapore that they've been using for years to sell their all right and that's the end of it does that mean it's not an open ended conspiracy of course if the government just happened to cut it off by there you know what to do is i'm sure but that's an open ended some friends that are back in the case who were not involved in the arbitration what role if any does that play in the billet to satisfy the continuity requirement but i don't understand were named in the original complaint ok so you have something of a culprit here which we have some people where there's been no judicial decision respecting their actions whether there's something ongoing on their part i'm asking you whether there's anything that you can tell us about the defendants who were not part of the singapore arbitration that might play some role in possible just because they were good because they accomplished their goal within a month when most people would take several years to do this does that make any sense i mean isn't this exactly the kind of people that congress wanted to get
are you know in the united states for so long according the proper that he was in time that that his producer was in contact with the horror of a troll and he thought he had authority to do this i think that given the circumstances the jury could think that mr slidell had a reasonable belief under the circumstances that he was acting with public authority i don't think it's an objective standard like a fourth amendment objective standard for a fifth amendment you know objects can i think it's it's more it's tied to the defendant's state of mind and that's exactly what the public authority the fence is all right on i would only state with regard to the issue of the public authority defense that the court should bear in mind that the investigation of fox news was doing in this case because of muslim aliens in a stash he was asked did you just let people off over the checkpoint he didn't do that he let them walk over the checkpoint and then find that he was transporting a means at all so there's really no basis at all from which a reasonable jury could find that this defendant was acting on behalf of the border patrol or thought he was authorized to transport transporting crossed into the united states called him and he went down to pick them up so such a goal we have is him still the sitting back same crime that he committed a few hours later to a different person who medically but well i think it necessary i think we would have convicted him without it i think to prove maybe there was there was abundant evidence but nevertheless it does show that he knew they were aliens this was part of a crime you had to get people across the border before  them and another another crossing another load of drugs for instance if this is different better better for us i think it wasn't the actual address coming across but it was the same kind of thing as another load of drugs within a few hours of this load of drugs it was
you and stay in shallow water into you know how to clean avoid running and horseplay around learn and practice life saving and rescue reading never go swimming or boating when you're tired don't swim way overheated or right after eating never dive into water in there to know beforehand how deep the water is because obstacles mean lie hidden below the surface never swim or about in an area where there's no one around to help you and never go boating without a life jacket on we really do yeah we were good no boys you just made a mistake one i don't think you'll ever make again yeah when you get out of doors who feel free but we're never free of the dangers around us we've always got to stay alert there was a hiker here last week for example so he came prepared he had on good hiking shoes he carried a snake bite kit and a canteen of water he had a jacket in his pack in case he got cold and emergency snack and even a map of the area but he made a mistake he broke the first rule of safe hiking never hike alone whenever you hike tell a responsible person where you're going he decided to do a little climbing like so many other hikers who were injured he went beyond his limit he called for help since he was alone no one could hear him you won't be in danger from cars you won't be endangered pedestrian helmets and pads are required so everyone can have fun without the risk of serious injury b mostly good that time by this much cardio now jerry just forgot that sometimes the only way to avoid danger is to stay away from the places where dangerous and abandoned car might look like fun but jagged edges broken glass and other hidden dangers can spell trouble what other places would we stay away from  dirty oh they can live like on peach street that's right being alert and you staying away from those places every chance parks and playgrounds and places where you can have fun safely you see terry here you can have fun and not have to worry about traffic my problem is i keep forgetting important things like being alert and we forget carrie it takes practice to keep aware and alert and there are lots of new dangers that we have to look out for to you that's why schools have safety clubs like the danger dodge and then maybe i should join my own stilling winky cherry you're going to be all right danger dodgers i salute you
that's telling the truth about just living situations about contact with his girlfriend's children about what exactly was going on and when he was arrested at his girlfriend's house who has children she didn't know he was a the probation officer asking him does she know and him saying yes that proves that he had not answered the probation officers questions truthfully so when the district court referred to that rastan saying still standing by lation seventeen and then wrote on the judgment this is a violation seventeen i think that makes the record pretty clear of course violations i'm saying was based on a condition that was not imposed on me and so that is about this that the biggest question is how does this affect mr spight the substantial right there are a number of other violations as a twenty four month sentence and what i look to in the transcript is i see that the judge certainly was worried about the other violations the other violations were almost uniformly failure to register sex offenders but there was some mitigating living with  no unsupervised contact with minors that's right a one thousand other one violation but there was some mitigating information about that and what the district court i think clearly was expressing his frustration at the revocation know absolutely and you know it's what we see this court has a long tradition of when the original sentencing one count goes away on appeal and so the court will remain a free sentencing and a lot of times you get the same sentence all right the count went away but we still did that and i can take that into account but especially in the supervised release context we ought to let the district judge make that because the appropriate sentence for a violation of you're exactly right that there are other factors that the court considers in arriving at a sentence but one of them was you lied to the probation officer they were not relevant to history and characteristics oh absolutely it is but you a contrast in there you know if the district judge here explains twenty four months is an appropriate sentence because you're a dangerous sex offender i don't like that you had contact with minors and your failure to register just makes you a danger the commu and i suppose you know violation seventeen was a little bit of a shift in allegations you know this really was the th paragraph below the allegation and then we added does the girlfriend know that he's a registered sex offender to  including five violations failure to register failure to comply with condition one by ration of not prior leaving the law and one violation of not having unsupervised contact with minors none of those
colossal number of more than two hundred and fiftie this group in washington represents the best into operation father drives and the whole family i've just  whether it's an airplane engine or a v eight there's always work to be done and i cool drink it's the spot on a hot day for us the big day was here we were ready for the flat out run to see if we really had it or we checked with champaign to make sure we had the right heat range the parkers were all added to making their last minute adjust a word with one of the toughest competitors just joe the sidewinder crew from long beach california and then we were ready to take her down to the line they had to check the gas to make sure we were in on rocket mighty good on the trip back to the you never want to count your chickens or however the saying go is the day of illuminations we heard those expensive noises when we fired  fortunately the cam was ok the eliminations were starting in time was working against  hundred fifteen i national championship drag races seen the detroit drag way detroit michigan we have competition coming from as far south as the panama canal zone and as far north as the canadian area from the east coast to the west coast it looks like everybody in detroit was in the stands loss twin chevy taking a good lead over our fun screen monster getting off to a good start they're wrong up to the halfway mark their neck and neck wally parks presented the eliminators healthy in the sports car class to jack or is the junior of miami florida one in his lincoln powered devotee george montgomery of dayton ohio receiving his jovi for winning as the little nelson drag master was considered in the judge's opinion the safest constructed car of the meet they also won the trophy for the lowest eighty lowly parks that can to the crew of the green monster to share owners with are to our fans for and here comes the singer miller car being pushed back to the winner's circle the car that won the me and so another nationals draws to a close records of been set and broken ideas have been exchanged and those e s will return to garages and workshops to create new machines that will go a little faster and get from here to there in a little less time for this is the story of ingenuity in act
i must say that's the most intelligent things you said twenty five year high monster he got to have breakfast here are you going over to the blood bank for a goose your beautiful voice you in town your father speak correctly and what comes out from the abdomen you i just came from the radio station i know ms does it we we've changed our mind we don't what is via the radio radio i brought you this script for your radio program knows radio program that means you that your uncle good the first to drop the name of montague the first well what about you those escapades in paris london budapest that exhibit under the name of gaylord don't turn him away i'll call you a dog who knows it may be  hundred dollars radio i should have to leave the room that day and i may become violent when i see face to face the beast who has corrupted my boy come dead awaken the d follows immediately
over twenty three years has two u s born children one has a daughter with a congenital heart defect and cannot get any treatment for her and pakistan the judge immigration judge should have taken testimony we don't even know how or what occurred he just cut it off based on his understanding of the law at that time
to respond as to whether mr anderson waived the issue for a violation of the costa rican treaty by charging him with money wondering when that those charge impossible to get documents through the embassy from the coast read in court on prior to filing my opening brief i tried to get hold of the court i called united states embassy in washington to get the phone number deny states embassy in costa rica i was put on hold for a very very long time and when someone finally came on the phone she says that the person who could answer that wasn't there or that i should call back and so i did several days later then the person i these issues for the government and now we line solely on your specialty argument no your honor it meant that i believe that the argument i made in my opening three i read my response  did you just think about calling the united states attorney's office and so do you have a copy by chance of the decision i have i don't believe i did that but that really it was the right hand of or not doesn't help me on the waiver issue that i have to come up here for a motion to allow the judge to unseal it but i also knew that required me to wade through volume of his motions and i came up with perhaps two cases the two incidences where i can say he didn't wait a bit and those are docket number entries one one two and one three zero which are styled complaints about the indictment jurisdiction but saying not a motion inside within those documents mr anderson complains about the eighty five charges that violate the treaty so if we're going to construe these prosaic planers pleadings literally like this court is required to do we have to prosecution or indictment other than challenges to subject matter jurisdiction or waived by fair to waive them prior to trial now the district court could determine whether to relieve a person from that waiver is ever that's messy and has at least eleven hundred docket entries it's not a pretty case there's no is no way around it it's not a pretty case but underachieved as i said it's been waived procedurally you  page three of documents one twelve and one thirty it's one sentence where he just objects generally to those to those additional counts he doesn't at all mention the doctrine of dual criminality he doesn't mention the rule of specialty sentence but the likelihood that he given that he imposed sentences imposed sentences of at least fifteen years on other defendants including defendants she then missions brother wayne it would seem unlikely that the court is likely to  aug eleventh two thousand and four and at that time judge toler our age that november first two thousand and four as the spies in motion deadline if we look at the
difficult case for everyone involved and one that should be kept in the back of your minds when you hear about the evidence in this case and trying to put yourself in the face of the jurors who are hearing evidence that they're used to hearing every day and hearing  problem it's hard for me to get around that ability argument that's right to remind you about the emotional nature of this and how the jurors are considering an expert witness as well as a pariah of the community and could they partner that you lived with for more than two years isn't a story real fast and that makes up the numbers in both the set you know and the stable the only thing that can change those numbers is he can become sixty years old in which case he will be reduced by one he's not slow off he thinks it's pretty smart he really didn't like it when people don't think it's smart but he's very awkward his testimony you know most of the jurors saw that it's not something you can  because there was testimony that he had these mental disorders which is not contested that affects his bullish in all capacity which means he even if he wants to avoid a fine he may not be able to and there's also testimony that he had a history of substance abuse so if he's out in the community of his drinking alcohol he may not be able to employ the strategies that he's one of the media even if the jury believes him dead that he has learned these things
floating down the welcome other others depending on plastics to get in there safely as parachute is made of nylon plastic as for plastics in peace air they are in our home augmenting our comfort serving our nee this truer than in the field of plastics for a better understanding of how this modern industry average then let us turn back the pages of history to eighteen sixty nine when grant was either a natural product development tasks was used at that time to make then your dollars and the anarchy but it was going to costly the growing demand the slaughter of whole herds of elephants in the long haul from the congo to the states all these that the resulting mixture go a semi liquid substance called a rest could be molded into prominence shaped by heat and pressure your balls live rules on frames for glass but it had one serious defect it can burn the product of this putting together or censuses is then heated the waste products are driven off and the result is a resin which can be molded by heat and pressure to any shape after it becomes a powdered resin fillers  in which all of the properties of the basic modern telephone for example is a phenolic plastic material and therefore will not run readily perhaps the chemist desires an impact resistant resin to be used in industry where tough durable materials are required same elements but in different arrangement and the reaction results in a new molecule which looks like this now this single molecule monomer is like one and with them a small he kept play a game plastics came into their own little mongrel beyond the rhine marshallese people for war germany well aware of difficulties in obtaining raw materials auditor scientists to develop substitute ersatz materials that were  england desperate for the weapons of war turned to ask for help lend lease was the answer conscription unheard of in our country and time of peace was ordered by congress in the to a total of six hundred fifty million by nine hundred forty three a gargantuan increase of two thousand six hundred percent which exceeded that of any other comparable industry and eighty five percent of its production was devoted to warm weather was in the seventeen of every twenty pounds the must exist would alter the war's what can be made with plastics things as varied as buttons and baton cosmetic containers and cockpit housing parachutes and refrigerators radios and razors contain plastic