representation of the facts of the case but i stand by them i believe there's substantial evidence in the record that shows that there was a traditional marriage and it was in the one nine hundred eighty let me ask you this  how they are organized and that's how the cadre get permission to come in and force the one child policies through the department of the government which are ubiquitous i mean just all right and so this is a township organisation to go report the next day she's under aged and not traditionally married and i mean and not that her father no license to marry so  decided in november of two thousand and four i didn't cite and neither did the government in this particular instance but i believe that the dean case would allow this kind of  treatment to be considered a forced abortion and in this particular case the judge says well i have had people who've run away in this instance why didn't you run away well in the last case you didn't run away and she did run away and they weren't given any protection and in this case they don't run away and the judge says if you did runaway nigger we could have given you some more protection so i believe a dink a soft a lot of those problems it's normal longer a subjective  situation where each individual immigration judge can decide what is forced and what is not and so also i believe that the judge brought into cricket in the decision discuss the credibility and titian of his found credible but he doesn't say why that there is no real analysis that immigration judge as to why this is my client was not credible  and the other part of the claim is the labor case this particular chinese man and then in one for nine years before he was letter he had in his wallet which was a ten year old letter from his friend who says don't come back because you're going to be mistreated the judge said he would give it no weight but then in his decision he discussed it for a paragraph so i was and i had to make a choice whether to include in the grief or not to include in the brief i included an in brief because i believe the judge did give it weight even though the judge said he didn't give it away  killer day by her employer that she would have to have a because she was underage and they complied they went the next day she had the abortion and there was nothing to demonstrate that it was forced upon her except opposition and made no effort to avoid it so people who like the government policy who go along with it have no complaint no case to stand on well in the sense that she was working for an employer  whether they had any connection to the chinese government it's not clear on the record there's nothing to suggest that they were a governmental body why would an employer be worried about this too many kids in the child care facility i don't know but apparently their policy was but since she was younger than the marriage age of twenty four they instructed her trip to have an abortion isn't it curious that it's the same policy that that the government has i mean it seemed to me that the company was simply the agent of the government that's not clear on the record i mean any employer can impose any requirement on the employee whether it be whether it be drug testing to track out and out of state ninety six people that returned to china to work find one was fine four thousand dollars one five thousand dollars and here the immigration service found that there was no evidence  being one of the one hundred people that file that complaint which didn't do these two people have any other children at the time of the sort of forced abortion now i believe that was the first pregnancy and then she didn't have another child within a year