MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
says the focus is on one of the original charging instrument gives the defendant sufficient notice of the subsequent church to prepare for trial on their charge so if you're talking about impairment  and the williams rule is pronounced in a lot of those lines and the williams rule doesn't apply in this case the state has sought exception that was created in j s c would have to be in a large to know swallow the remaining methods of charlie sheen a misdemeanor which would be by complaint normally you know and with the rare exception there's a information's i don't have statistics but if the court were to suggest that to the five percent of misdemeanors charged by information i wouldn't disagree at least  charge after the defendant confessed to his jail cell mate clearly they didn't know they could charge that person with murder before their occurred if they had that scenario they didn't know that the defendant our record is unimpeachable the state needed but do they have to know at a certain microseconds of time for this case to stand a firm no because we can say they knew more dismissed the per se they don't have to prove her at all they just put the number in assuming that someone believes it to be valid accurate and legally appropriate they would be able to obtain a conviction in the trial effect following the law must find someone guilty if they stay on which the person was going away to morrow at the time of the parade in the vehicle but if that's why in a hypothetical sense it in the defense attorney can be ready for trial an apparent case even though there's a blood alcohol level where they may nothing ready for trial church i will be free or another lawyer will be free to argue that you can ignore that in the face of other evidence it is it might be a slight difference but the lawyers have won more important cases and more s added a new witness to their discovery that same day and they filed a motion in limine a asking for the court to apply the one point one eight conversion ratio so they knew they were different they were different case there are oftentimes those little vernix you need to be able to defend against though i don't believe it would be difficult for the court to find that the defense attorney could charge when they were given a speedy trial how will the one hundred sixty days to figure it out this is not a small office in a urban's rural setting this is a they were taken by result but in this case the officers police report stated the result at the hospital he the officer learned the result before he again just applying local construction to protect the defendant speedy trial rights i would suggest that one could argue the commencement of the prosecution would be the rainy day but that's just  actively involved in the prosecution there's no doubt in our case if you want to use just the real world and now this is the one moment that changes that is active involvement by a prosecutor as opposed to show in traffic court with a stack of tickets at the prosecutor's involved is fleeting and i think that's maybe the critical difference between the two types of charging documents as
things like that he can he can put up on it can be a bar for the early history if a bar is there in the in this court reverses the distribution of the eight hundred thousand dollars then i be totally relevant to this appeal but just to get an understanding of the case and by day's ten thirty seven you said judge eco says order said in any necessary fines to be filed for a while what the court today yes at that time i don't have the correct terminology but you did not have a liquidated claim that correct now answer is it does sarah any problem with standing when a creditor comes in with  of the family the children and mother to be under if we affirm the disposition in this case in this case is because i'm done it's closed if you couldn't go back into it i guess i don't know how you could go back into it well and then there is some kind of independent cause of action against  the stay was denied then they would post on the pay themselves is that if i tried i cannot figure out who was going to post a bond in that case i that's what
about so what would you have  immunity to intentional infliction of emotional distress  you know i'm thinking based on this record it's hard to know whether he weighed or balance properly because we don't really we have some general knowledge of some of the things in these pape
first bit to the peers there that their claim that they did not do so deliberately was was very disingenuous and there are some good reasons for wanting it their way one on the first to the first to the fact that they initially claimed th well i think we need to look at the way that these things have been analyzed in lopez and how far too because the right in sieberg is apparently truly was the police  i didn't do it on her test scripts negligence enough for us to conclude it was deliberate i don't know if we need to use the term gross negligence but i think that we should and should recognize that when people are so grossly negligent the people who actually prevent the outward statements how close they are in time the setting whether or not the setting is the same whether or not the same police officers are a follower of the completeness of the pre war o they have more instances well we don't really want him to know because he realizes he's in trouble he's close to thirty and she's a teenager and they're sleeping together that's what brings you know she's got a sexual offense possibly pending against him not so naive because he said before he was planning how to shift the blame to c e o because they figured she'd be treated less harshly here in this if he already knew that he was in trouble and he was going to be our police department to the to p g county holding cell he said and this is believable certainly he couldn't sleep while he's in a holding cell with ten other people he's then put however in his own smaller cell and he said i want to sleep so answer to from the defendant would have been preferable of course it would have been preferable but the defendant never said i didn't understand these rights i'm confused she said later but she knew me he had counsel he had been appointed counsel in the morning he had asked for he's he the leader said i think that this is an incredible statement given the fact that as i said at the beginning he had already concocted a plot with seo to the flight the charges or any kind of guilt from him to know you probably have a problem with the first confession ok isn't it time to be careful and eight o'clock in the morning and then we have somebody coming in at two o'clock in the afternoon saying do you want do you have an attorney if you can afford one want to be appointed for you and your response is that for now also putting his signature on it saying i understand i have those rights he's telling you get and i waited that's their insurance policy that here but with the peaceful incenses know he was actively involved and so when he makes these v a defendant and this defendant make a vague kind of questioning inquiry about those rockets that's not an indication and again i agree and i believe that see her once you get past
at this baseball field she sat and was watching her son play on field and i know her there were always warming up for the next game they were warming the young boy i think he's eleven twelve times through it all and there's question whether the recipient of that ball whether the ball ask him to love or not but no matter of wall
that if you are going doing there is nothing requiring you to do it i just want to know whether or not you want to afford property owners that we foreclose against the opportunity might increase our chances of carrying the house in winter which  lot because it's going to take one table work and a fair amount of steps on my farm in order to accomplish this and you could say in ten percent of the taxes  know maybe we are being i mean i just think i know the pain but every and but i do think when you're looking at bed net and we're getting twelve inquiries you only one bit i think it's worth a couple of phone calls to find out what whether the timetable is to get whatever the case may be i just think yes you have a comparable product that would function just as well and potentially lower often in the in the day you know you're looking for you know we're looking for small amounts of money and so if you do find another vehicle it's ten thousand dollars cheaper i think it's all of those and make recommendations on i on i like the nominations but it's too bad there there are  i think we should allow a small campfire have to say that the age of our housing stock and the close proximity of our homes and the amount of five terrible terrible years we've had lately and what with what is what how do you measure small right you know wish for if she were here well and that's my you know my other thing too is that city county green and regarding riverside park a question about damage it's all you know is there anything in the fantastic i was looking at quickly that would bring the cost to the city so i
and then and i just have to keep trying day by day i learn more about what it is that i have to do to be able to survive so that i can do what is what i believe i was putting your  who were filled with hatred toward someone playing music with street and you get the extremes to get people to love you you know and you also get people who hate you do this for a living you know who are no better than i am you know all they simply been doing long enough that they've learned the tricks of the trade they've learned when to come out here when not to come here and somewhere along the way i remember one person was telling me they were thinking about killing themselves until they heard me on more than one occasion so i was the by young women who said that they were so happy that there was someone like me in this world and that they had not seen anyone like me what do you think people  artistic musical sexual taste anything the world is going to put you down that's the way of it so i'm not
fuel tax funds on that contract for that is exactly what the circuit courts injunctive or it the court made clear that it was ordering the department to approve the quincy contract otherwise the secretary of the department of transportation decision is a matter that's the danger right now in the circuit court why or why can't these issues be done there i mean why should this court do anything other than say moot there still litigation there could be another bidders who have their feet occupation status removed from them coming into court to try to get a court order saying state you have to let them perform this contract is very high and the results  is that state money then is spent on contracts where there's been a some determination that it's not in the public interest to permit this contract for going to this particular it in forcing the suspension bring subsequently brought to rule the show cause and after the second rule to show cause the court said that secretary of department of transportation finally did the prior to court workers by sending out the letters that it did that are in the record and that's from c tool five to ordinance how the taxes will be used when the ordinance is passed it goes to i doubt i doubt approves the spending of the money at that stage then i  secondly on esta sovereign immunity from page just six forty eight at the high illinois site it says play does not attempting to enforce the present claim against the state but rather seeks to had for thirty four years the net why isn't that a gross that the discretion of the secretary of a because the way the rules for applied and the way the statute was written if i awaited the for all applicable work again applicable is not defined and what i got to this day ended what it's called a section pay certification and that sort of occasion goes way constitutional due process violation because the rights of due process means i must know what i to expect they just can't willy nilly  officer i doctored the findings of the hearing office and most important is the court two weeks ago today i believe oh hell arguments  handling contracts to the liking of those lights well again please pay on a car this is such a narrow issue as to what took place how many contractors are going to be doing some street work or whatever this case what are the staff should say about what they're supposed to do it or they're supposed to do it i don't believe the statute says anything but i had get i'd like to point the court to the case of illinois health care associate vs not walters and it's a good example
invisibility of the fourth statement which was taken twenty four hours later and september seventeenth that's at issue in this case with your client in the trial court contest where there was a boy voluntary waiver of miranda before the second state before the second starts questioning him again not necessarily where jones left off but now he's coming to question for a starting over but because he just gets into the park until it is but then there's also s defendant if you still understood his miranda rights and then on cross examination he says he advised defendant verbal eat of his rights from the day before give me your take on this what's your position on that i think in conjunction with the evidence based on if you're doing to tell the circumstances evaluation based on that and the other evidence if you think it's sufficient and then adding in course the fact that the marine it they are it can be made rather that even though they were close in time you know time wasn't the only factor that there was a change in personnel from jones to taylor that there was a different focus of the interview course of miranda warnings given by detective taylor and that he was actually confronted the specifics of what they said during that second interview so all those things should have  spontaneous declarations were probably needed it seems that the whole argument comes about whether or not they have the opportunity to reflect on her statements and the only testimony that i recall on the record that i believed in the subjectively though effective she's trying the fact that she's shaking effect that she's trembling are those all objective factors you could point to to show an absence of premeditation where she's sitting down thinking through
after the others were reversed so we could generally assume that he had completed that sentence at some point prior to eat you can assume male bass with case yes you
any of these isolated facts and dispose of them and say that that's a legal question versus a jury seems to me there's a series of factual disputes that may enter into whether or not he was keeping a proper lookout and whether or not he would as soon proceed did intersection acting as a reasonable person who's driving a trailer with a significant blow and talking on a
employer but two different shoes curators there was an order of reimbursement from one carrier to the other that was the commission's authority was being disputed on that issue  filed a brief in this matter and i thought we are here today i was sure of it just to discuss the need for a swedish to counsel i believe is objecting because he never had a chance brief the matter thinking that we had a settlement which now appears to have fallen through and i have been trying to get in touch with the powers in my company to see if we still head if they revise accident and his claim was that he that was when he first became aware of the second accident this is the only evidence that links the petitioner's injury to the october ac were early march i'm not sure of the setting and then after that there was no further treatment told us incident in october right through well doesn't that provide some independent evidence that he didn't have any problems with his with his hip as well but that's february two thousand and four accident is against the matters where the evidence again i point out that and analyze its question i know you understand this that no one is challenging the fact that
and in some cases even final design has been has come from essentially federal highway dollars or other state dollars and so again the it is thing is if we come on to the clark street very green it allows people to use the existing work street bridge to access and then they can directly use the room in either direction and where they're going they're heading west or east are getting goes under idea what that costing would be right but given that you know it does just throwing out a ballpark does that make the seemingly low cost alternatives really and i decide that i want to go to the library getting over there on foot is an absolute nightmare i try to walk over i go underneath that tunnel i walk part way towards waverly whether there's a crossing there or not i'm you know you know where most of the cars are coming from but it's really not safe trying to stick anything outside there there i think is a recipe there isn't one and i don't have as much trouble but i know we're not going to get on top approval to get a bigger cross on there and now why do you think the sidewalk under the bridge sounds really problematic with big give these numbers the conversation we want and it is does this seem to make sense with what you think about the different alternatives you feel like the ones that would be beneficial to the green line and one lot of people might just look at it and go i just want to go there i'm not going it if you did so if you could sort of review given the ones that will last and highlighting the connectivity and some of that like there are people only on the north side or only on the south shore and you since both sides of the station right now are an equal i know it probably sounds crazy but maybe want to consider two options in the center of town and that would eat you have two options if you could connect the north
desire to create a record the desire to avoid a conflict of interest this don't really exist it was obvious the trial council has a wide range of responsibilities a lot of the work that council does a trials of the record counsel knew about this witness interviewed her and made a choice not to call her because for hit the reasons he student was how would the defendant's earlier state in the record that she's determined that if the attorney interviews the potential witness and makes a decision that's a call that witness which indeed happened in this case but that is trial strategy without the counsel said that we need an inquiry of counsel in critical hearings absolutely not rex court said many times that a critical motion can be denied just based on the base of the motions self what is never said you have to bring coun arguments just morning and your excuse
meeting of the skies you know what our plans are going to be to go through twenty four parks that we have here in the city we were tasked with you know going through doing needs assessment we are told what we have to work with which stuff that we dated is ok to utilize that we do have a lease and swings up there and again the city the change that we're talking about covering some of those swing changes minor stuff is that we're in the ready or is there something more that you guys are mile trail connecting central park with built our reputation ranks within the five five received funding of one point three seven six million dollars of which eighty percent is federally reimbursed this is the master agreement million the bulls ten percent they had nineteen percent now the issue then for the run up was that as a d v d it actually gets into the specifications of what their classification was the majority of them far as the minority goals go for a federal project exceeded ninety nine percent and ten percent almost one hundred percent exceeded because the system doesn't differentiate the i would say race or the race putting together a big package and when they put their bid back together they submitted a bid with a ten million dollar bill which one point nine four was their subcontractors which they had somebody or the big sort of come in after the fact and say you know we don't agree with  that would change the price structure and i would think that would look like a collusion of some kind  meeting to identify some of these businesses around here so i'm thinking you know is this where you feel this curing cancer or someone if you know there's a particular business that deals with a particular kind of work it's a minority business maybe we can just working with the right now or how we spend the charging station and how we can go forward charging station is something that as i looked around to be able progress we would like to see more of them in the city we have some wiring already in place underground and your old car we might putting some in other places as the market changes so we want to make sure that whatever charging station that we choose is uniform throughout the city it's not local different times for fusion that is will take the findings once again just to clarify this is a this is not for the evil it is for the premium so how this will work is a base sitting here because somewhere around gas just for somewhere around seventeen thousand dollars something for us to review a couple weeks ten twenty six third avenue where there was a fire and three additional properties and praise street so using money for demolition we can match a grant application to basically create new entrants into the market open it up  everything everything talking about is contiguous to her with the exception of ten twenty third avenue which pops up a granite against seven twenty frame street with that property if w joint fourteen for approximately seven weeks at ten dollars an hour this does not increase the budget we actually have more dollars budgeted in personal service for this effort but because of the delay with the
objections at any point in time it was also only said in october and i had my client while he was in custody and away he found this case a divorce which take place take place well by trial is just something that something of that nature nobody knew that was the case that would necessarily be the case i mean things happened during trial the continuance requested by the defendant very considerable potential or the judge suddenly stopping to be a judge in the middle of the trial and the state's attorney suddenly stopping to be a state's attorney the i mean of course continuance is discretionary but whether bush was an expert everyone agreed that he was an expert on crime scene investigation but whether he had expertise in other fields so when the judge still defense counsel that something was relevant that was entirely appropriate because it was an issue in which the judge had to decide and the judge and had to determine what was relevant in the specific things the judge said wasn't relevant was that the elder bush had once read a book by an expert refuse to do so the and yet he had a testimonial bush did not just that he read a book one time and did one case that was specific that he had done over five hundred murder and other investigations for the only state police over twenty plus year career of analyzing