that would be an appropriate condition of the  hamlin and complied with each and every condition of order of probation during that twenty four month period with the service completing sex offender please the court now you know my name is john t v i'm here on behalf of the state defense counsel talk a lot about focusing on whether the original probation sensing order probation what the trial judge said he said completion and he was at this point he was comparing this case to the two sided cases in defense counsel's brief completion could've been made without the gold star success or cure and then he goes on to say but you don't diligently make efforts to complete the treatment is a reasonable expectation of the court's order notwithstanding its lack all the lack of order for expression and to that extent that wasn't made fully clear to the defendant the time of the order to that extent the defendant has a reasonable complaint but i think on balance it's been fairly well established that his conduct on probation in terms of a slow start is one that is the heart and soul of the violation and i apologize in my brief like you know how  really was the normal course since i don't know exactly what the normal course is but it's a twenty four months defendant was advised on june surely after the court accepted the terms of the plea agreement defendant was his probation officer that sex offender treatment could last two to three years so a reading of the record shows that i don't think anyone in this case i don't think defense counsel the state or the  trial judge or the probation officer had a reasonable expectation the defendant was actually going to complete all of his sex offender treatment in the twenty four month probation i don't think anybody had that expectation but so let me ask this question as you revocation hearing he's saying that even if he not even if he had not fully completed it you know got that sign of you completed this he's saying that it is well established this comic opera patient in terms of the slow start is one that is the heart and soul  years still carried over give and my understanding of the sex offender treatment and you know the evaluation the subsequent treatment from the record from the probation officers testimony was that there's no really you can't really say it's really it's going to be different from each ordered they basically said that it doesn't make any sense to order sex offender evaluation in treatment it doesn't make any sense to have to make back order if your goal isn't for completion so the trial judge clearly stated that our goal is obviously for him to complete treatment but the trial judge in this in this revocation said that it's not the day completed if you would have made suppose subsequent diligent efforts into reaching that goal of completion then i'm of the understanding based on what the trial judge said that his his probation would not been reading paid so i'm not saying that the ultimate goal i think it's the clear and reasonable goal of the probation office of the probation  was that the defendant complete why wouldn't the trial court just extend probation and not terminate probation and put him in the pokey four hundred eighty days i mean i think that said a great point i think that they have the ability to do that and i yeah i think the trial judge was i think he made those statements to kind of say i realize that it's a completed and that's why i'm not going to hold you to the standard of completion and i think that after i read what the trial judge said r and soul of this violation is a slow start and the trial judge i mean he he from my understanding of the trial judge said i think you would agree that if this defendant the day july two thousand and seven defendant met with his probation officer and she told him then the treatment took two three years and again all the parties knew this all party where where where the sex of either bad sex offender treatment could take two to three years some don't was under the understanding that the barring him starting from day one and every think on perfectly that he's actually going to complete this and that's why don't order you don't order sex offender treatment unless the ultimate goal is for that to be completed and so i believe that's what the trial judge's order was that's what the original order was that you are to undergo sex offender evaluation and treatment and naturally common sense tells us that the goal of that treatment would would be for it to be completed and that's why he focuses on the fact that  defendant waited so long to get the initial evaluation and so if we look at the totality of the two years the defendant was on probation he met with his probation officer early of july two thousand and seven she told him at that time in july that is going to take two  could take two to three years and she also invited him that he need to get in it to get this evaluation fairly quickly that's when defended moved to chicago for a job in peace and now he did receive he didn't go in to receive his a valuation until december tenth so right there we have six months after his probation officer said to complete this program which is our ball to complete it it's could take two to three years getting and getting that evaluation so the evaluation was received in december and he underwent the evaluation from december to january and then in april two thousand and eight he went to a place called kids hope to get the evaluation and april two thousand and eight kids hope release the recommendations i mean the delay was due to the defendant to pay a certain feeling that he needed to to get that psychotherapy and chrisman the probation officer informed defendant that the only place he could do that in bloomington which if this point he was back in bloom got to chicago and come back to bloomington the only place you could do that bloomington was twin cities defended at that was recommended by his probation officer and my kid so and then subsequent to that time and in the state is in agreement that subsequent to that time defendant has done a fairly commendable job of it going to counseling both at twin cities and at latino family services in chicago but what it what the trial court did is they took you know that the revocation hearing was held on june twenty ninth was exactly twenty four months give or take a few days after the original plea agreement was accepted by the court so in that two year period the court if i look at the totality of all this i do not believe that the defendant given the first twelve or thirteen months of his to i'm going to monitor you and i don't think you're making sufficient progress it's a moving vote like i can but you know that's a time that you have always already been sentenced to and i can order that you served i know in july two thousand and eight he was sentenced to serve