MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
before we begin i'd like to ask everyone to turn off their cell phones or put it in silence mode i'll check into our district offices in hunted district office are you there a thank you without objections members i'd like to close public testimony with yours thank you members i'm going to start the agenda out of order starting with item number two and this is the cow one twenty five the litigation matters settlement authorization in the matters of the grievance arbitration between the state of hawaii organization of police officers on behalf of clinton go via and the county  police department show polk case m dash to fourteen zero zero nine the department of corporation counsel is requesting consideration of the proposed resolution to authorize settlement in this matter council has previously authorized settlement of this case by resolution fifteen dash one thirty eight and sixteen dash twelve we have a we have here today deputy corporation counsel want to lead to advise the committee on this matter misleading you may out the floor to present an open session thank you this is our third time here to discuss resolution of determination of  session to convey that offer to you and so i will be requesting executive session of members to need any further proof factual backgrounds why don't you give us a brief summary just to refresh everyone's and he was not convicted of it he was acquitted he had been terminated a result of the investigation by the department and it is now in grievance proceedings where mr gove is seeking reinstatement eyes no nos four excuse motion carries thank you members are moving on to the next item seconded by mr couch and you further discussion seeing none of those in favor say aye all those opposed say no five eyes no nos four excuse motion carries moving on the the chair chair thank you again with reservations thank you so noted any further discussion and see none all those in favor say aye although supposin no five eyes no nose for excuse motion carries thank you members moving on to the next item this is cow one twenty five litigation matters in the grievance arbitration between the state of hawaii organization police officers on behalf and clicked in good via eyes no excuse scuse me strike that five eyes no nos four excuse motion carries thank you members thank you very much for today's meeting i also like that the attorneys and also the administration
engineers are filling in part of this big from the mainland to the break water to make a wider b construction work out on the break water large brown steel pipes are laid along the top of the breakwater to carry the sand is to beat their wi on the base side of the break water the water is car so that the meme can free and air bob's neighbors are hunting grounds with freighters unloading at the docks cam see better from the top of the pile of lumber harbor engineers of long beach are extending the land for a new pier where ships will bring the building materials to the water from the wharf is a busy place coming with activity make plans for a house they are looking at is in its correct position will be exactly at the spot where caroline's cross in the center of the lamp that is how they can tell that the line of piles is straight later they place steel rods from the wooden piles to the large crane swinging buckets of sand from barges to fill in the space between the pile it will take a year to finish the i knew  burdick friend explains to him that rocks play an important part in our construction not only for the breakwaters and piers but also to protect a building banks along the edge of the harbor and so the work continues until a barge has a full load it is ready to leave for the break was borrowed at the end of the breakwater the construction work goes on on one side the water is wrong what a contrast to the bay side of the break water where the water is calm and smooth a large crane swings the rock from the bar point where they are building the brick wall a man on the breakwater by signals tells the crane operator where he wants the rock place many types of cranes are used on a large construction jobs man uses machinery to do as much of the heavy work as you can bob understands now the tremendous amount of work involved in building armor knows now why the bird their baby hardly knows enough to be afraid of visitors
think lucian that there is a sufficient likelihood that he would be persecuted where he would be returned to his native country of russia and whether that persecution would be on account of at least in part he stayed around for five years in the area being not at his parents house without apparent difficulty working all the while he got a passport and a student visa to come to the united russian government in his words was harassing him and his family on account of their political beliefs now that statement was not rebut it below and it was not addressed b also support a view that the evidence indicates if you're patient and i was or if i may first the treatment of mr caps off family is specifically his father his brother his father was a member think it's also worth bearing in mind your honor here if you're crossing through a translator who was unable to translate certain portions of the transcript with complete accuracy so i think that needs to be taken into account as well would you say we should look to the pointed out that during his testimony his father had an unspecified conflict with his appeal and i'm subsequent nervous breakdown he didn't show that anything that happened to his father was connected to a political opinion or that to the petitioner obviously he never said that any first it's a little bit unclear as to whether or not his father's in harm's father may have suffered as a result of his political opinion and it's very far removed  therefore it is clearly he hasn't established a pattern of persecution closely tied to himself so it would be a great leap for the courts say that anyone could have imputed a political opinion to him based on anything that happened to his fa economic opportunity it's not that i need to come here and work and send money back for my family etc well economic reasons also not support an asylum claim so one we had he wanted an education which is fine however he came to united states and didn't enroll in school persecution based on your stated ground if you were sent back to russia but the evidence i have is that he stated he came to the united states for an education but didn't enroll in school he said he came to united states to pursue economic advantages circuit the fact that he remains in country and was able to evade the authorities there before coming to the united states does not show that he was not subject to a sufficient likelihood of being persecuted
been thinking about a lot of things tonight i was thinking about how much a guy can learn in four years i'm not the same guy that left home four years ago i feel like a big guy i he doesn't even know what he got up  but i don't really know any of  has run out of a country is now you know the other day a guy asked me what i was fighting for and i want to live right now face a good look at the spending you mean those words not just the words tell him to find out what they mean what they really mean so they're not just words anymore you know i don't know what the hell you're talking about
your daily newspaper well this is the many or most of us read a paper every day sometimes the comics we want can't miss the doings of our friends in the cartoon that again it's a sports page  we all keep track of our favorite team or possibly the us they give us tips on where to do our shopping yes it's here in the paper we read it every day yes few of us know how it fact they looked for her everywhere and the search went on for hours but the news men still have work to do first to develop a thank you joe does it here in the dark room of the star and they look good to him so he hurries them through and take them into the news that land this is the advertising department where they handle the advertising that helps so much to pay for the paper i've just got the last of the ads laid out for the printers and while he's working it over let's get acquainted with the wire editor he handles all the news pouring in from outside the city this news comes in on a wire to the teletype  a wire editor has all this news and is new to it and he decided not to run in the paper about how charlie's story coming along well the copy editor is writing the headline all right now headline story go he okayed them and sent them off with one of the others to the composing room over in the engraving plant the engravers of already company the picture of susie and the boy scout underwear negative when he checked in here through his magnifying glass it looks like th he has a negative amount on a piece of glass and now he puts it over a metal plate this plate is covered with a chemical the homeworks goes under a powerful  when it comes out the tone and lines of the picture are etched on of the plate and it's ready to print down here in a l but the first thing they do is to take a proof of the story on this
was the argument actually made before the district court with that the methodology or the weight of the field had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and and then in the opening brief to kill be argued that even if it doesn't have to be proven beyond reasonable doubt in the wake of poker the methodology still has to be reasonable and the the problem with using the testimony of mr walker in this case is exactly what coun stated to the court given its earlier it was very ambiguous because this have the money came out in this in pieces through cross examination and that kind of thing if you take exactly what mr locker said and you country had analyzed bought the pills one from the east coast the other one from san francisco one had over two hundred milligrams of oxy all the other one had about one hundred thirty five i believe it was conservative and so forth and it just seems to me that the court very reasonable very conservative given what it had to deal with under the circumstances in the amount o sentencing hearing and really tried to pen this issue whether he could provide more specific testimony about what they actually did in this case that would be possible that really wasn't that much of a focus
and argues that it is improper for improper to conclude the knowledge of particular facts about the hierarchy or or history of that party is a prerequisite for asylum based on membership in that group in fact well because he was not directly involved in the arrangement involved in the procuring his and arranging his departure from india he simply put paid in agents to to obtain a travel document for him and then to secure it by security there was something there that he was given name who who asked him to perform party activities such as he mentioned that he didn't want him was hearing at night but never mentioned that there was anybody who was the leader of the party locally or in a
many of your pals left you that day if you happen to catch one of the wrong banks they got a pretty nice repair  the boys receive holy communion as this is one of the happier cow patches that we worked in over than england and look who's dancing so i used to dance but it's there we couldn't get girls and right here you see jack pepper was into the courtesy of a draft board that night as always when you know a real deli is coming up you're a little restless out of the dispersal you hear them winding up those
it for generations and generations way before you would be were ever born right may it please the court counsel your honour's good afternoon or good morning my name is michael writes as i indicated i represent the defend seventeen which that basically created the right to refile within one year which would have been a th two thousand and eighteen i submit to the court that there's basically four dates that are important for the world that talks about the reinstating or refile in a case the bottom line is i know everyone files a voluntary dismissal longer to ten o nine but it's actually thirteen dollars to one dollar th that actually saves the case and gives the plaintiffs another year to refile so will the cases that i was looking at i haven't found anything that comes anywhere close to what happened here what ended up happening here was there was something that was final within that year and that was on i've submitted this word that that is not commensurate and a new action number one there was no fee paid for number two there was no summons issue five between eighteen that came  statute tells you what it is you have to be a genius to figure that out your honor i agree with you and we filed the motion to dismiss in the circuit court because we believe that the resolve action was actually on october th two thousand and eighteen which was five months wanted to entertain a supreme girl rule three away a motion we would do that we did that it was granted she indicated that there was a question of law she indicated that there was a substantial grounds for difference of opinion and obviously records the case you know and i want everybody to know they had another member of this panel you see he's just as lampkin she is guilty today but she will listen to this case so you have to speak up loud so she could hear that and some other t but none of those things were done here i mean we can't like the circuit judge would try to give you no break here and there you know we were three judges who decide the case we have the design of the law and the and their positions and we will have an opinion or according to you very shortly the
by the witness by mr wolfe or that they were probative they're not they don't purport to be verbatim statements you on the statements were made during the course of the interview you are correct that he was johnson during the trial but there was nothing to indicate mr ball as a doctor that document and in fact he said after he reviewed it on the stand that it did not refresh his recollection about that conversation statements that he couldn't remember making that and at that point scott johnson could have been called back to testify about whether mr wolf had made some of those statements and that could have been used to impeach mr wolf and i right that is correct that is correct your honor
the specification which appears in the four eleven column on round lines fifteen to twenty which addresses specifically what g d likes to call relative rules and what the court found there that goes to whether a course that  specifications one district court construe the claims in respect yesterday were not subject to dispute in the court wrote in various places a claims cover automatically censoring if you look read the specification it repeats consistently that the price axis of described there is that and we know from the speed of the words that it means it can move through automatically center and that's not an intention and if you look specifically at the portion of the specification which talks about what they like to call relative movement which is called non lines or through twenty five what the specification says is that inside markets move off  manually now in the specification in the four levels and is different in part from the specification in the zero five five big difference well in parker now inconsistent contradictory confusing but there's nothing new york life i've patent that says that the terms static itself mean something different from that same term is used in that spirit one thirty two or the related three do not make complete sense and in this case what you have is a t t claims and actions that are static abstain time be a reference to a being able to move automatically but if you read the specification there is nothing that puts the public
types of biological evidence some semen that was left in a condom that the victim identified as having been used by mr osborne person she said with mr oliver into harris ground on her clothing judge relied on those circuits which were inconsistent with things like the fifth circuit and the last wilkinson has answered that question once and for all by the u s supreme court if there was any debate about that it is now there isn't a younger versus terrorist problem here i know that in the twenty eighth a letter we got yesterday there was a citation to it gilbertson case but the issue younger requires that there some manner of interference with the state court proceeding gilbertson case dealt with guilt and this is all right tell the case in which are disappointed litigants in a state administrative proceeding sued the board members the court said well there should be an obstruction to see whether or not he could win on his claim that the board members unfairly consider certain evidence this is a case in which the proceeding if there is any is the refusal court on remand from the state court of appeals the state court of appeals incidentally found in its opinion remanding that there was no federal right through testing this d n a that it was or if there was one it was a state right and they service why don't you do it well there's a number of reasons for it but we're not here to argue the merits of that today well when i ask you the question you asked the question and i can give you the answer but i believe that those various we're not here and i
civil law for negligence cases proximate cause to say what is required that is the actions of a person have to be the proximate cause of the injury it is result oriented it doesn't really matter what his or her caused a song that's an invasion of a person or property of an owner right that's what it's called as well the title of a car sold but the element doesn't require that using force against any person it just happens to be that the title they'd give it would tend before the trial court time of sense was there any evidence introduced that contradicted anything we've been talking about up to this point and the evidence presented there the defendant at sentencing force would be involved in this case because you have some of the record under the current statute in people versus stewart the supreme court court colorado's case the defendant must be driving a vehicle recklessly in that reckless conduct must be the proximate case it only requires that the proximate cause of the injury and i think that term proximate cause is used many times over especially in the civil arena and it's been brought over to make it easier to get convictions of people who cause injury even when they
after surgery to repair the shoulder completely broke the chain of causation between the original work injury and his current condition to look at this surgery that was nothing only healed he was involved in subsequent motor vehicle accidents which then caused of the fusion nats deal which resulted in the need for additional surgery  relates to the shoulder issue because you are treated sherman there is no causation however the record clearly shows the petitioner also had an elbow condition that was operated on may of two
case i'd like to start out by just giving an overview i think three important areas that need to be focused on with respect to this appeal one is history of the agricultural credit possible under the act to ensure that they would stay on the farm that's the purpose i believe and i think it set forth well in the course of credit and the second area  down three hundred fifty four thousand was accepted in writing by the virus and was approved by the state office w i don't believe it requires approval beyond the state office and i think the testimony on the record establishes that because that very question was asked by the hearing officer at the hearing officers hearing and he asked what is required to authorize the
he doesn't seem much different from others in his blog and yet it may well be that never in his life has he had the love and the care that most people would give to a pet for people and never typical every person is different with inner motivation to his own often not even known  it's not that the dishes are dirty and the house is messy it's something much deeper perhaps the emptiness of a home that is lacking in love and affection  whatever it may be jeff turner has become an outsider made so by complex circumstances which he himself can't fully control or understand outside just turner is much like any boy on the block these are city boys but there's not only a city problem no role to get involved in vandalism necessarily deeply disturbed but forever the natural want of human feeling has been turned to resentment by constant lack of  understanding there's danger which lead to the destruction of property this is more than a simple matter of keeping the hands busy many people are nervous and fidgety but they seem to be able to control their actions so they're not destructive in these brave feelings of resentment or too great to be controlled completely even when they themselves are not fully aware of their feelings although they have no plans at the moment these boys are hidden for serious trouble before the evening is over to these bullies be persuaded to take part in some community activity in order to help them get rid of boredom active boys clubs with strong leadership and community support might win their interest and keep them of the street the community has a responsibility here but so have the boys themselves they have to be able to meet the club halfway a club doesn't mean much if you won't join as schools too in the after hours activities as well as in the classroom can do much in the fight against vandalism the sympathetic interest of teachers and counselors can do wonders  a better understanding of right and wrong might do these boys away from the direction they are heading but the key to the problem is in the family it is here that moral values are first implanted to be nurtured until they put down roots family friends community institutions all play their role in the complex process through which every personality develops into its own individual for these boys through many unhappy and painful experiences have come to feel resentful toward everyone  even so small a thing is an unlocked window may trigger an act of vandalism stuff it's not planned nothing to be gained or achieve destruction has boiled up out of hidden resentments strikes blindly against everything   living being you have surely as though you had denied them i know that there are other factors too the school the church and the community all share in this important problem but the basic fact remains that you three boys are yourselves responsible for your acts perhaps doctors are social workers and others on our staff can help you overcome the fear and hate which  brought before this court help you learn how to live a happy and normal life nevertheless i have no choice but to sen
the charge the government and i disagree as to the appropriate standard of review to be applied in this case but in fact i think whichever standard you do apply the result would be the same actually look at the facts i mean what it sort of looks like is that they could prove that and more but you know people that have spent time in criminal court that it's not uncommon for people even when they culture he would be giving up his rights require the government to prove all counts of count twenty one which was the firearms charge hadn't lawyer right but it was so you know it's hard i'm struggling and that's i think there's a difference between the motivation in buying firearms in the first place and then what you do with it later on but that would be the government's position if the court has no further questions for the government