so i am bound by the four corners rule don't we have to just confine our inquiry here to the language of the contract well i believe just the contract does outline the scope of work contrary well if i can go on in space see two sixty six of the writer he was asked what his understanding of zero tolerance meant and he said system sensors was zero tolerance you know when they came into work that law i wanted you could see every parking spot i mean you can see everything was black even it so you know you hit them a little bit extra with a little bit extra salt but but his understanding of zero tolerance big clearly did not put anything in the contract is an addendum that specifically says this is the understanding of the then client property manager and the whoever was in testified in his deposition that he was there continuously throughout the storm that day yet we have evidence from the pager court with a measure of the snow and ice that had not been stopped snowing got a morning at the fifty two  an extended period of time where they didn't return and the snow and ice continue to accumulate through the fifteen hour period of time i believe that to occur but yet you're also saying there was no snow after eight fifty two there's no snow falling to finish the job well their cars are this business is is a period of twenty four hours of the business in so they're going to have cars there's nothing in the agreement then i could find it's and they had to remove all the inches correct correct everyone who testified stated this was a how the blizzard like storm that just was continually sleeping and icing throughout the day and your clients obligation under the contract was after two inches have fallen they needed to would somehow indicate this to reasonable people had different ideas about whether there were facts and therefore we should accept if there was the we were reaching real dispute and i did not again i think system sensors she testified as follows regarding the zero tolerance and he indicates that he told them that ice is not acceptable i have to have it clear around the clock and mr mo testified that their understanding of the contract was that he would be continuously throughout the storm i think the multiple e mails and multiple telephone calls from sam signal rather indicate that they did not remove  snow or ice continuously throughout the storm let's take justice for can't see example and some time after him for purposes of this scenario she will assume that they were there at some point during the day ok that they came they cleaned out with the cool idea they left and somebody back their car out didn't clean the max unshielded depending on which way the car is going didn't clean snowdrop there accounts there's more to six other faults that they can there's requests throughout the day i don't think this is a situation where it was an isolated incident where you know perhaps this was one small area of snow or ice on a the client's property manager unless otherwise agreed upon in writing and attached to this contract look at death sets where i would are concerned that's where i would argue that you have to look at the intent of the client's property  sometimes we have the records from du page county this is not one of them if there's a contract you want to look at it should be with your grief in your appendix of your grief so just keep that in mind for the next time around because we do invite you back when you really need to come from your