two thousand and fourteen but section three in only imposes a duty too weak to report on a weekly basis on the person who last a fixed residence therefore in order for the state in so doing this state will have all of the information it needs to demonstrate that the pending did not stay in any one place for five or more days as defined by section to section two states that if it's residence if any place where defendants the put to a for five or more days in a county in this case the only piece of evidence to in this case the state never demonstrated or never entered due student to any evidence suggesting that mr scott did not meet the temple definition for   he agreed to do so under the belief that he was under that duty however his belief was what is his believe manifested only because from his point of view he tried that being homeless that any person who lacks a fixed residence must report weekly in person with the chief of police in the municipality in which he or she is located and the statute goes on to provide a means by which the state can meet that burden  introduce the documentation of all the locations where mr when mr spiral stayed in the past seven days and even prior to before those seven days and by then the state would have if spanish that he did not  sending a first note and we quested that the court clarified i didn't require to demonstrate that this state that the defendant failed to register knowingly or he failed to register knowingly late in that particular jurisdiction will document each weekly registration to include all the locations where the person is steve during the last seven days and also according to the statute a fixed residence means any and all places that a sex offender resides for aggregate admission to being homeless on august eleventh by virtue of people's exhibit number one the registration form that defendant completed although the defendant is making much of the defense counsel is making much of the fact that according to the forms he registered fixed residence this is racing form over substance including the legal definition in the documents which just would be asking too much of a homeless man or woman any rate the jury could have registered as homeless for the last two years and never listed any place where he stayed so i think a fair inference from all the evidence in the record and overwhelming stablish that sandwiches say he did not have six residen acquiescence and people are also maintaining because they are not essential elements that there was no air presumptively proper and as for the the trial court's response to the jury questions while they were deliberating deliberating defendant also agreed to the responses given and  discretion in its in its response its response was to merely consider the instructions that the the jury had already been given the jury had been fully instructed as to the elements of the offense the parties agree that these instructions were sufficient determine the jury was not manifest continued and the question the jury posts reflected no confusing the confusion on the differing reporting requirements of differing groups as nothing had been discussed at trial other than defend its particular reporting requirement so adding the word weakly to the existing instructions would have probably even vented defend his detriment were it whatever emphasize the timing of defendant's late reporting and also based on the questions that was asked the trial court had no duty to instruct on the statutory definition of fixed residence instruction the instruction suggested by defendant would not even remotely answer the question posed by the jury which state could meet that duty the statute clearly states that the reporting agency to agency of jurisdiction will document all the will cations where the defendant or d are offender would have stayed within the past seven days providing the state with the information to address the state's contention that the defendant's exhibit one hundred twenty five houses demonstrated that he did not see in any one place in five that is simply august august sixth and so on and by day we the jury would have been in a position to determine whether it be right and whether any of these location he provided on any of these days he