MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
something for him right and the connection is much in very easily made by anyone that when it says bell receipt that that's what she did she made a payment for him for bail at the court said there is no  government that he was on bail for a criminal offense as it is time and knowledge what the word fail means and i think that but if we decide with what do during the time that he's accused of committing this very offense he is on bail for some other evidence and it's highly prejudicial i don't think for a minute any jury acquitted nor that even given the admittedly strong admonition given to the jury by the district court  stuff before you court this was as your on a pointed out there was no bail or c in this case that bail received has nothing to do with the defendant it is irrelevant to the issues in this case and more importantly than the actual instruction itself was the solicitation from the district the best we've ever come up with even to this point one before your eyes this morning is in the brief in the opening three from page twenty four there is a possibility that the jury may infer that there was some other crime committed by the possibility that they can infer that some other crimes committed that and it's reference to a bail or seat and a bogus state that is actually after the date of the trial it doesn't refer to the defendant it refers to this this other date it doesn't refer to a particular crime which i think in dixon and some of the other cases they talk about he's done case so it's sort of the from the history is taken out of the picture but also the mere facts of this case that are set out in the very fact that we're talking about someone driving the stolen vehicle theft we're talking about numerous other items in the back of the vehicle well it's the prejudice that could possibly be drawn based on the pellets brief of this exchange again it's it's maybe he committed some crime in the past maybe around that date of the arrest in this case well that's something that's already before the jury that's something that they could towards the no one flesh and we had to put on witnesses and put on evidence that works towards those reasonable inferences to be drawn by a jury and it had to do with you know finding the owner of the truck only the owner of the truck talking be the jack and things he would use to replace the a place the tire if you've got to fly things of that nature so they're actually factory if you can so that they're filled up and they cover goes over them so when you place something like it's going or anything else in that compartment the cover
this point we raised two issues on the petition to this court number one that the decision of the immigration judge was incorrect number two we challenge the procedure of the entry he never testified that he was a member of these groups for f i o s he said that he is just did his brother in law what is the basis for his claim that he would be targeted if it was this really helped the group but he wasn't a member exactly and he testified that he wasn't a member but the immigration judge said this letter contradict you told me you're a member but example a r fifty he testifies i was not a member of letter no i don't think anybody ever asked him about the letter they asked where did the letter come from and why was that in english but mr spar or m groups but your basis of your claim is that they that he wasn't a member but they thought he was a member so he fears persecution i want to govern that says government official says he's not a member that's seems to be inconsistent with we also there's also the doctor's letter that no one's talked about yet the doctor's letter said that he just involved rest and petitioner justified that he got injections and physical i don't understand that argument and can expect corroboration and there's no corroboration of the death of brother in law or brother there's no corroboration from his family when his family is still there and he could have gotten letters or declarations or evidence newspaper examination of how many hands this letter crossed through but again when he was asked why is it in english he says i don't know why my family's an advocate he didn't get the letter he didn't speak to the person who got the letter it came from a third party
an atari l that is you know accurate the record reflects that that application was completed by an attorney in her office at page three thirty six of the record with respect to the one thousand nine hundred six application the question was who helped you fill out that interestingly in his testimony before the immigration judge on page two ninety two ninety three he states that the police told him he was arrested but yet that didn't appear on his  but with respect to the final minute view he never told the asylum officer things about the bag being put over his head with the intoxicating substance he never talked about electrical wires being attached to his body that they caught police had attempted to rape her but that she made a lot of noise and i believe there were people working on her and they came to her rescue and stopped the rate from happening then in her hearing before the asylum or before the immigration court rather she sa she believes that she was right what happened why she became unconscious and when she woke she was in the hospital in peace to find her injuries she believes she had been raped but there was no evidence no record to support that the hospital didn't tell her fact that she didn't talk about the fact that she and her husband were in the hospital and so there was some discussion about it but most the testimony did center around the and i would also the citrus council points out the fact that there was some testimony with respect to the asylum officer and a question about whether his notes were correct and i would point out that the board  before the immigration judge was a few days after he was released from the hospital which would have been in january of one thousand nine hundred two i believe and so that's inconsistent it's also it in if you look at the asylum manchester there was no mention of the house burning down that was something that they raised in the gratian proceedings before the immigration judge they didn't raise this in front of the internal master and this was their opportunity to explain in front of the asylum o
so i just go over this point again when we save up all the food we can once we're out we traveled by night eyed and rested in the day that's right unless you get hold of civilian clothes then you can travel by day posing as shape for the intelligence services talking to an authorized person as good a chance of escape for others i bet you make sure you pass what's the matter aren't you hungry i'm saving up for a rainy day yeah you don't have long to wait around here that's what i figure all around the city it's too dangerous ok and whatever you do don't accept a lift from anybody the only people with vehicles in this country are on official business we're number i guess that's all curve down here come on which way we head south east that's this way it's the general direction of this highway all we can't use the highway itself we have to use the back roads and fields seems to me the rivers are first objective yeah and then we head for the mountains right you got a memorized yeah i stand with my eyes closed what are you doing guys are pretty touchy about and might show military information we would want to be shot is fired would we well now that you mention it i remind me that's not go looking for trouble but don't take any chances we don't have to take caution that's our motto we only got one job ahead of us not to get out of this country there is just across that open to the border and freedom but even with freedom in sight anything can happen come as a prisoner of war a soldier is still a member of the army fighting to the united states forces will make every effort to free him or it is the duty of every soldier who has been captured to use the presenters most effective weapon escape obey the orders of the senior military american president coming or noncommission refused to give more than name rank service number and date of birth rates used to give parole refused to cooperate for propaganda broadcast signing a petition or other purposes inimical to the interests of the united states or of assistance to the enemy program live and act during his captivity so that there will be no doubt but that he held to his mission of fighting the enemy before and after capture by planning and executing reasonable attempts to escape the soldier may reach freedom even if his first attempts failed they are never useless a well planned escape or attempted escape requires the enemy to utilize additional troops both in guarding prisoners of war and in searching for those who have escaped escape can save you from years
residence or employment outside of the state of illinois at least ten days before establishing their residence or employment he shall report so we have to roll carefully at the arena sections three and six here gives you you know
likewise that requires that there be a reasonable expectation that the scene completing party be subject to the seeing action again in this case since he's only since my point is only raising sufficien case in progress conduct resulting in restraint or medication in this case i think he was medicated or emergency basis for the innocence that happened and the staff was afraid that his range would escalate and explode people and tries to impose his ideas resulting in danger to himself because others retaliate and in particular since december and at the hearing there was evidence that since december twenty  he had been making greeting threatening remarks to one particular person hovering over him in his personal space until he became so educated that he hit the response i also argued that with his invasion of their purse and personal space and threatening remarks and the extent of that threat is demonstrated by his their retaliation in hitting him so don't be deceived and i don't think this is merely a
so whether it's an inverse claim in state court or it's a takings in federal court there still could be claims preclusion and after the court denied the right to just can't be a taking claim or an in first class record you know normally these reviews are highly differential it isn't that this court would come to a different decision but this court would find that there's no evidence basically for why the counsel do what they think and what the record that we have here of all the code violations the criminal problems there i mean there was overwhelming evidence for the city to say no you know you shouldn't be in business if your office if you want to was compliance you know live that's basically unless you have any questions deferential and so law and given the fact that the district court had the entire record of the proceedings before the city council in the planning department is on before it does the district court has to sit in the novo review and resolve all the factual determination or can it simply say council heard all this evidence yes it was a split decision three to two but i'm satisfied that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the presumably that requires an analysis of california law and the ordinances of the city of anaheim and then decide on the basis of the record before it was or your client was in fact recorded the process that was by local law once it resolve those issues and that some point within the next few weeks then we will use you a written decision which says what we have decided and explains why we have decided it that
softer wood between answering the controversy of wood versus aluminum in some cases the mosquito as proved less vulnerable to gunfire than metal machines the wings are formed of large sheets of supple wood light strong and easily result is a high speed reconnaissance bomber acted for the first time the mosquito was wheeled in the hangar for a trial run this new weapon is being built for the havilland company as a result of a bottleneck in life metal material its engines are being made one motor got it can stand like a fighter maintaining perfect balance on the on the tip of new guinea island is an important harbor for the united nations if it had fallen into japanese hands our position that fought more as they would have been endangered and the whole campaign to drive across new guinea and kept it going and going up w tank fire these important links in the supply chain tanker trucks are shot up thirty seven millimeter field guns were discarded by the japs in their flight they will now be turned against the to a direct hit their gas masks are typically stuck to the flimsy material here is one of the typically brought short bayonet this soldier has put on one of the very practical two toed rubber part small six the tops are opening in many communities here anything from a radio to a baby's rattle is accepted heart is that i've been doing a lot of thinking what i'm trying to figure out is why so many of us are taking things for granted and not doing all we can to help win the war maybe it's because we keep hearing and talking about the war lasting for years that sort of thinking might keep anyone from perry it could be that this long stuff was why we lost almost half a million minutes for production time last month absences and that's anyway and i'm fed up with all this talk about a five or ten year war there's no sense that we can win this war we've got to if we don't your boys will be killed like euro this means that your pipes that's no fun to work tonight here it's not easy to put ten percent of your pay in a war about none of those go for gas and food right these are nothing compared to losing someone you
legal issues stay consent in new jersey didn't you hire the right of privacy in the legal detention of a u s citizen not connected to terrorism using the un acknowledge the existence of state secrets privilege and the important legal principles at stake and the  can i can argue a conspiracy the object purpose motive essential nature direct evidence of an expressive tacit agreement elements of intent knowledge and concealment ok i think i got all
check conspiracy was going on at the time he met mr darwin mr hot on august the first two thousand and two there's no evidence  directions as to how to get there and the driver of the car was the defendant so it's certainly possible that the jury could infer from learned that mr girl was speaking to the drive who showed up in the car driving with the checks and that's important to note that the defendant knew that these checks were in the white envelopes and he said that in the statement any star that point along that truck two of those checks went from the white envelopes into this brochure a brochure from a gas station that arguably could have been in the glove box or some other place in the car and then on the first past the  check so he watched that handoff and then they went off a distance and waited and another called him in and that was the passing ok bring the rest of the checks so they drive back around and this time defendant himself hands over that same white envelope you start earlier that has the tracks now when asked about what his knowledge was he was asked did you know that there were twenty counterfeit checks in that envelope and the defendant's response the ones that said he didn't think there was anything illegal going on what his response was up to this day i don't believe that he has that many charts within those two envelopes he's not saying i didn't know there are any checks in there he say well i do know that all twenty checks written  argue that with any amount be it ten thousand be it one hundred be it one million the test year was for entrapment is whether or not they have a propensity now we know that then and dove set up this deal had done the two transactions previously so in terms of a classical entrapment defense i think clearly there was evidence that there was a propensity to commit this crime and a willingness to do it that had been advanced before and when that first transaction was set up for the next day for the four hundred thousand  i'm not going to be alone than to have other people with me and the few people he had with him for the defendant and mr hart and they set up the deal so that each of them would minimize their risk and the way they do that is by having one guy show up first without th yes once everything is checked out in the clear then he called up his accomplices and says ok let's bring the jets and because these three were acting in concert this is how they set the  could always argue well it could have been done a different way but the fact or it wasn't in a different way it was done this way and in this case there was a significant amount of evidence to incorporate mr feynman starting on his i have a terrible call that i'm working through  we have not just the fact that he showed up and was observed delivering the regs of the crime we also have that meeting before hand and at that meeting he sees a jag he touches the check he knows there in the white envelopes he even knows that something illegal is going on and he says by his own testimony that his friend didn't have that kind of money and he knew that it wasn't going to now does not rise to the
take notice of the smart airplane luggage that the air passengers are using yes hello burton luggage especially travel tested by t w a for air passengers metal alloys make for a lightweight and camera you're not seeing the color screen test out esther made through the lens of the studio camera esther changed into a ceremonial garb now make her first bid for fame in hollywood good the girls next visit the mission of san antonio davis love milton sixteen twenty one just one year after the mean flower landed on our eastern shores here in the face brought them by kannada when sixteen twenty to other charmingly dressed girls wait in the lobby this is a stunning burgundy leaf evening dress with a white background of crown tested ray on the gray silver fox jacket is one casually here is a brilliant plaid dinner dress with a tight fitting jacket from our armchair a seat in the sky we see arizona's famous valley of the sun phoenix tumble back mountain is outlined on the horizon well below our peers camelback in where the girls will soon be sun laz fashion make way for comfort in western clothes there you'll find the friendliest people on earth it must be the desert  during the cocktail hour of margaret appears in a sophisticated sharon one blue dress with white yoke and rugged with peta daisies and edged with perky white pick a appropriate for the cocktail hour is the double breasted palm beach jacket and grey  are the adjectives to describe the magnificent grand canyon flying on west over the colorado river a huge slab of dazzling white concrete between two narrow canyon walls becomes b greatest engineering achievement of man lake mead extends way back one hundred miles behind the dam more americans visit this three thousand square mile border dam area near las vegas nevada than any other national park in the united winding highways curl and twist their way on the canyon sides here is provided inspiration and pride for all americans to share cathedral rock is a chalk cliffs that stands alone and isolated beauty filled with commerce argosies of magic sails highlights of the purple twilight dropping down with costly
which operate connected to the government there's a lot of questions as to what type of connection there is but there is proof on the record that there is some sort of so once she makes this expression her friend who that he wants her to become a member of the gang become his girlfriend and she says i don't like the gangs in fact i don't like the fact that they can operate with impunity and they don't have anybody when they kill somebody or they hurt somebody they're not charged with anything and that was and her duck operation which is but here's the administrative record at page two hundred forty she says i was scared depressed and had no life and beyond the threats from the gang members attacks up questions were escalating and here's the part that i'm curious about and my father was looking for me and upon my eighteenth birthday he planned the circumstances connected with the help of other local leaders recognizing that i was in danger  the father did make a statement that he was one of her his daughter to undergo you don't refer to it as your brief ok very reason why this is left out of your brain is just oversight  i mean the other side says this is speculation and here we have a statement from her my father was looking for me upon my eighteenth birthday he planned to circumcise me with the help of a local leaders and that's pretty much corroborated if you believe her testimony by what happened to the other two sisters right i'm just curious why this didn't show up and your whole life in school  that the court considers the evidence in the case and determines whether it compels the conclusion contrary to the board of immigration appeals we see her as a credible person across the board with respect to all of all the evidence that and she lived with her sister at the time where her parents had sent her to live it's our parents were very aware that that's where she was she was in fact eighteen for approximately she turned eighteen in november and then she came to the united states in it and she's opposed to it and when you be a little more sneaky than to come right out and say i'm going to do it tomorrow that part of your argument i didn't think too well well that part of my argument is based upon the ors here she doesn't provide any sort of indication that it was on account of detected ground in fact really she says to you didn't know in fact why he was after her  account of him so she only repeatedly said in all of her testimony it never says that he made any other statements with regard to the reasons for the persecution other than the fact that he wanted to be friends or love i'm sorry you would if you did find that there were well founded fear it would still need to be reminded under of interest for the possibility that there may be that the government may rebut that well founded fear because immigration judge and the board it has to go back are decisions not made this decision was made and if we decide it's wrong and it's a discretionary question well it certainly is a discretionary mean