years on march fourth the defendant was interviewed about the murders and released subsequently on july twenty first two thousand and six the defendant was charged with those  so the court's order below is manifestly erroneous as well as erroneous as a matter of law because the court failed to consider the entire circumstances surrounding the interview and did not dressed they gave him forty five minutes to do so so they're not rushing him gets its leisurely and kind so forty five minutes to get dressed the officers arrive in one car there  three officers one of them is going to have to sit in the back seat because it's so big that quite put some emphasis on the fact that there was an officer sitting in the back seat with the in the bed logically this should have meant nothing to a reasonable person because he had to write somewhere he couldn't they couldn't force three officers into the front seat of a squad car and then he would be sitting in the back but i think it would not work the reason and the other you know the circumstances the mother had no car and could not drive so the defendant had to be transported by the officer and that's what i mean there was no more caution and so a reasonable person in that position also would not have know that she gave permission for the officers to take her son for an interview and she also denied that she told him to shoot but when this court looks at the video recording of the viceroy interview you will see that the defendant himself agrees young mama told me about the murders and she told me to tell the truth and so is the mother and has no credibility on this issue and apparently the court  station he's put into an interview room and when this point looks at the video you can also see the officers go in and out it is an open door it's not locked so he isn't on locker room he's waiting for fifteen to twenty minutes and then and the the take shows him i mean it's a it's a d v d shows him you know wind down with this you know head on the desk and he's he's you know relaxed he's probably still sleepy from being opened up i don't know any way but they really weren't necessary because he wasn't in custody are they telling you don't have to talk to us so that's another that's another circumstance that that would make a person in the divinest position not think that they were in having but he's not he's not threatened he's he's treated very kindly they understand that he's a sixteen year old they understand that he has limited reading ability and they treat him very  express no no suspicion at the end they ask him to stay a little more and they say do you have a problem with that he says no so he he agrees to stay on it it was necessary i think well why don't the question what's assume for the sake of argument that hears them because tell us in detail what they did as far as the miranda rights are concerned my my understanding is now according to our supreme court of the people versus price which was recently cited proving away by our supreme court case called people versus later the now in this case the police went to their religious house actually t were the warnings which dr cooney you have reworked in effect were read to the defendant that they tried to make sure he understood and that if he didn't understand certain in places where she was shown to be not credible where she said i didn't tell my son to tell the truth and he on the on the video will say my mama told me to speak the  has his report you could see that the defendant was more perhaps intellectually stimulated in two thousand and five and he was in two thousand and eight but he seems to have a better life here in two thousand at the time of the unit and that's all areas of his performance i q in two thousand and five was sixty six his school scale in two thousand and five was sixty eight in two thousand and eight he had dropped performance to sixty four dropped two minor in some testing and then he did he and two thousand and five was done by the school he relied on that report i'm talking about the the rights that were one of the rights out there were they were they were geared