review this and the file a history of this matter and review mr sharing reply brief and his approach first of all we started in our in our argument from the fact that they did not ask basically they were asking for yes there are some cases with that but there was not specifically put play there there is cases to that yes ma'am if far as the coming before the court what we came before the court on is actually the second time that mr circumstances that were not anticipated throughout this matter when you look at mr harper if and then when you look at mr sharon brief on the behalf of mr haider you find that he qu the medical history of her boss she had been raped on a temporary basis from eleven dollars an hour to thirteen dollars an hour and that was all a temporary basis by the time we got into court her boss had returned  fact the the hours were either being cut or in the process of being cut and the money had gone back in any event at that point she was working part time to record big trips out she was making at one point eleven dollars an hour and then with the bomb making thirteen dollars an hour well the reality of it is is that these people meaning the haters and the marital state and they were married for thirteen years worth fact living a very home they lived in a very comfortable with the circumstances really wanted far very little that since she became employed against the government and it was it was for mrs hater it was like trying to get away from  baby because he telling her you do this or you don't do that and when she tried to do it she'd get slapped by the court a list of the final his eyes i put the final and the last big m so the bottom line is if you go to community college she got a degree now the argument was and good luck promising to chastise the fact you're not working in your area while that's all while if you say that but as is pointed out in all our believe she not testified to birth or to the evidence but before the court because his testimony i think became incredible and should have been any credence placed on his testimony at all he was making even if you follow his testimony  dollars here and if you follow the true facts as we put forth in our brief and supported by the record at that point in late july of the year then we've tried this in online when you if you look at that he had made somewhat approximately seventy thousand dollars depending on what figure you will plug in so far seven months of the year with five more months to go he had made seventy thousand dollars he not only so we have one wonders making twenty thousand we have a man that is making really have access i think you in the area by one hundred thirty or forty are higher we don't know because it was the end of the year and the discrepancy there was so important because she had with that she'd have agreed it was something more that she could just do than just say i do it because it's a hobby at home when i'm not changing until a diver to not take them to the basketball game or whatever the those very very quickly as far as she deployed while i've been through there that's number one number two she completed her education goals anticipate number three days such a bad way she's applied to enforce a blessing hospital that's true disneyland that was all proved by my husband there was never any question about that it was a alive experience for the children at absolutely no cost to anybody it if it was some cause it was incidental important to point out is that as you put it into that i don't think and i think the law is quite clear i don't think it's necessary for us as a as a person receiving maintenance to deplete all of our this situation as pointed out she had to sell a form of marital home she could maintain it valid points out that asset was sixty forty i can't argue that if they were but there was no quiddity there you cannot if you put put down to bare assets it was much less than that it was probably sixty forty the other consequences as a penalty consequence she can't do it without depleting secondly i think it's important to note that she was given a house that was in need of repair all supported by the record when it was in need of repairs she had no money at all to repair the house so she's and this is i put the very first casualty to where she is almost spending in fact what do i do what do i do so she downside she downsized and she tried to maintain she cannot keep the lifestyle that she had during the married quite candidly because she didn't just no money she's working as best she can in the circumstances that once you find yourself and she has no money the contrary she is also paying i think that's important she's paying child support to a mr haider she's paying child support order and all of that is not a deduction or is a is a not a portable income to mr haider which is six hundred baht which is subject to our year and the mean time when he was paying her maid as obviously that is not only deductible  explain i don't know that that the judge ever got that but as i put my brave he was he was quick to jump on that and said absolutely nothing about the statements of kelly hater if far as  did affect the income within needs done within me his shop within the scum within this it's of just electronic but he did say that based upon the dollars sense that certainly the economy in my view and has affected everybody no matter what it is what you're making the same amount of money or whether you're making less money you still have to be effective because the price of bread and a price of milk has gone up dollars a year support the one for the future but with that we believe and i believe that based upon the facts that any of the evidence presented that my client should be in fact entitled to not both we never did as well at least one of the children for an income tax and i think not to give it to her is an abuse of discretion we have a situation again at a time when she is paying somebody two hundred dollars because i don't think that mr haider ever presented it cost me x number of dollars to support these two jobs and without that we have no way of knowing other than our recollection of what it cost was held the court judge drummond in his decision on november the second two thousand and six sixty eight seventy cents and in his opinion he stated that the amount of sufficient for the mother to maintain a male home should she decide to do so late the maiden's is sufficient for the mother to earn a college degree should she choose to do so what happened in two thousand and nine is this and that was filed on june sixteenth two thousand and nine we had our first hearing in this case on october the twenty third two thousand and nine did not complete the hearing and then  not supported by the record at the end of the year we were able to submit all of mr hiders income that he received for two thousand and nine and resubmit it in the are there exhibits in the record of his income and the amount of his the amount that his income has had to fight at the initial hearing of the case he had a between two thousand and one and two thousand  he had an average income of one hundred seventy two thousand dollars in two thousand and six and two thousand through two thousand and nine he had an average income of eight hundred thirty one thousand dollars in the actual year two thousand and nine his income had even record support that in fact we have one hundred forty thousand dollars that is not the case and i in his income back in two thousand and nine would be just a little over one hundred thousand dollars i think the evidence was he was going to be receiving five you also got to seven there's twelve hundred dollars paid two thousand and eight that was sixty eight hundred dollars in two thousand and nine there was seventy two hundred dollars just drummond terminated maintenance as of january the first two thousand and ten he also terminated her obligation to pay child support up until june the first of two thousand and ten so for this year if she continues to pay three hundred twenty four dollars a month she would be contributing one thousand nine hundred fair repairs it made and i would be for the court also to the exhibit that was introduced at the initial hearing this case where there was appraisals of this residence and each one of the report group appraisals did not indicate that time that the parties were married and that was to act as a travel agent i differ with mr heck and i don't know if it makes any difference if she looked at two or three places it's my recollection that she may have looked at three places only said a senate written application to do two places so she also did well in school and she graduated in may of two thousand in nine and again judge drummond was of the opinion was was filed the court could have made it detracted back to that day elected not to made it retroactive back were to june or january the first the end of december of two thousand one hundred january the first two thousand and ten as to when the it would be retroactive to so he did not go back in and again say this is enough time basically for her to find to do a job in the area of graphic design graphic good also the child support was also terminated during that period of time from january first until june first so she did not have any obligation to pay any child support i believe it's also important  house she'll like to spend two hundred fifty five thousand dollars for a new house but that she had that nice and put one hundred seventy two thousand down as a down payment on that house so she receives sixty percent of evidence that there were twenty graphic arts jobs available no i mean she was asked specifically where she looked and you know she was not asked if you looked at a certain place of full time work but it was wife we've heard about the brand new home contrary again to what mr sharon said that's all supported by the record she can't support she can't support the home we hear and we heard again about all this money he put  all those taxable all will require a substantial deduction of take so when you say sixty forty so be it good faith effort i don't know what else you can do it is supported by a record it is supporting my belief that