second dr kraus in the chiropractors records do reflect that there was a radiating right leg pain throughout the course of this treatment from june thirtieth to august fifteenth and the commission says that there is no record of any like pain i also are he chooses  he presented for other issues doesn't deserve the weight the commission gave it so back to the first thing a d d t is a result of a combination of factors so even if you decide that the alleged immobility is a factor here it's important to know that it's only a contributing factor said they couldn't find anything to support the leg injury except for when mr schmidt reported the injury immediately after the training exercise he did say he was having like pain it would seem that in terms of your bird before the commission you'd somebody things even dr biden or sad he's going to the chiropractor for treatment of this issue so i think what's happened is mr schmidt reported the leg injury he reported it to his chiropractor his chiropractor calls a great radiating leg pain so subsequent to that mr smith things he's just being treated for this leg pain along with his back injury so there is there there is a hole in the records beyond grading right leg pain but he was being treated by a chiropractor he'd been seen before so he can't it was all tied together pete did report the initial injury though to the leg person who thought these things were going to heal themselves he'd been training with the chiropractor hoping that the back was going to heal itself when he presented back to reason he had already driven out to colorado so he did have some issues with stiffness but this stiffness was also a result of overall to be a little more efficient and a little more detail than they are as we can see from dr carson's records for example because dr carson saw him so many were times there are some glaring holes in it and the records are very cookie cutter those records are missing a lot of information you would think that they would say you know patient was in the hospital for a d d t this is a leg injury i've been treating him for relieving leg pain this might be something i want to put in my records and if you read the records a lot of it look appears to be cut and factor five late and both on the commission noted that they didn't make note of the immobility and i believe because you know guilty really overall in the big scheme of things and it wasn't the major factor here the major factor was it was an is questioned about this factor five he said that that is our typically does it doesn't cause the class but it is a factor that may they don't test for that until somebody presents with a d t he can get question  chiropractor knows reheating right leg pain as we discussed there are a lot of things missing in his records and mr schmidt testified on the fifteenth the day before he presented to the e r that he did tell a chiropractor who's having pain and  the fact that he talked about it to sergeant jim bowden when he reported the injury than the fact that the chiropractor records all do show right radiating leg pain and then we go into he appear in the regency room with a t v t devoid of genitive evidence of an ongoing lulay problem this is not listing the argument about the ridiculous pain which has a source in the bone bar spine not it doesn't the history provided by the petitioner so it's more than just the medical record doesn't support injury as a result of the work related training exercise when in fact the commission directly found the office so that there was no lady injury as result of the training action size  i do not build it i agree with the proposition and i would respond that in my opinion it doesn't matter whether or not the commission thought he had an injury or that something self there were two separate histories up on august sixteenth he was immobile for two weeks he was a bed for two weeks because of diarrhea those are those who for the record soledad i don't know that we don't think it's a question about a hidden cost asian argument is destroyed by the first visit to the doctor on the thirtieth or it was already better from the last time so it is correct we did not concentrated upon what is your injury or not because  clock you know two days later pretty typical case of seven seven weeks later more work is required and in this case the war wasn't there it everybody seems to forget about i mean twenty three of twenty eleven that says it was evidence of prior strain to think as struck me as muscle i would disagree with counsel when he says radiating right leg pain we all know what that means because we don't know what that means we don't know what the chiropractor meant we put it down what we do know is he was complaining of pain in his right leg i would also like to point out that dr handheld did say you have to have a mobility and you do have to have to hydration but prior way before they said you have to have an injury then you have to have a mobility then you have to have the hydration is a combination of the factors and more than just is the injury to the gas struck me as muscle that occurred on the training exercise of june twenty ninth which  causes swelling of the it was when he was running the obstacle course during a training exercise with both regime that probably all contributed to it because he also had a foot pursuit later that same day when he was i'm duty and is soon as he got back from vacation get a second purpose of that he did given his history to all those treating physicians so they are probably just compounded the injury because dr can tell did say you can have a spot for a while before it becomes symptomatic which is what appears to be the case