MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
plea which hamp listen the phrase the chinese only ineffectiveness the state responded by an interruption to disqualify defense counsel on the basis of the conflict of interest that motion created the prosecutors assistance and have asserted that we're going to err you know made the more aware that this would require getting into that information and then the court did not act on them a court denied the motion to disqualify yet stepping into a credible training we don't have to we have we don't have to you know there's a first step where the judge has to consider whether there is  and that's my point is there wasn't any of that until your office brought it up and so once your office brought it to the forefront should there have been here and that's the question and  of the possibility of a conflict of interests so that if we if it is just dispense that if we get to that point that's when the issue it becomes right as to whether or not there is a
i understand and perceive to be especially in conjunction with all of the other things that were struck about what was the overriding concern in handing out this sentence and so what i'm suggesting to this believe based on what he went to the prison which is a nineteen year old with a half of the south our education in the person indeed he has become today it makes no sense it could come from but here's another problem we face this type of reset and think based upon what happened several years ago in town in some cases where a jury verdicts were based upon the factors at that time if and if i take your heart you meant literally here you're saying maybe we should you know we should look at him as a can we just substitute the word or is there some other way that description is introduced into the situation where the discretions introduces obviously by the fact that the united states court said yes you can do mandatory but there is no reason that the way to say they are not going to make this a natural in my case anymore because i've got places to go i think the exude that he would have had if you had to say what i have to go between twenty and sixty with i think he may and no we were seeking the name and you knew it was for something to do with your gun affair that we didn't get it right then snap you know this shouldn't be a problem we should be here to tell you explicitly what we're doing and how we're going to try and do it it's good
i think it was so there really isn't anything about it to be made of that and in any event it's not expression for someone they didn't they are claiming that dialogue was taken that's an idea that a bomb can a failed effort to take and their weapons from russia to the united states that in his words i think that's probably a little extreme because i don't think every incident is dictated by certainly the kind of incidents that you're going to have they can be strong and different ways to tell a different story and here is the stories are quite different what's protected is at least i can say three levels you have the story level we're talking about the pattern of the characters the character relationships and the central sequence of events and the character and connection
day the question of the corners that it doesn't restrict speech because of the take it or parties but rather because the particular issues there how is this different why why don't we just apply white because scuse me i'm not sure i got my answer ok i think the analysis between parties and issues and white seems to be the same as the analysis between parties and issues in the case before us and i'm just asking why is why doesn't white something i think we're going to have a number of questions about at least i do i should only speak for myself about standing and rightness but i'd like to  predict all right so it's not you're burning to show willing speaker and how is it done here letter but i didn't find anything in the record the commission acted didn't authorize the letter and then she says well there's probably a problem because you might have to recuse yourself later yeah and who else  because of the advice of the commissioner something it may or may not may not be this particular judge thought that letter was advice from the commission and we're trying to find out if this particular judge has standing on the standing question on this particular judge who said based on  vice from judicial conduct commission in my state
following up on the morning that she was aware i was out there so she's talking to him to determine you know should we take this guy in on this minor with this warrant all our basically and she talks to him doesn't take it down because again this think there's any question as to whether he could be arrested for this  without focusing on a murder charge the statute made out of life but this case i think you're right the focus was on the murder investigation under the case law on the liability involuntary this are separate  asked specifically to look at her words likely because they're wondering how did the state actually michel i think it would be disingenuous to find it the statement was not considered by the jury words she was not trying to get in the sort of formal statement she had had dubious statements by the victor with a grim edge against the defendant she didn't check the computers she found the prior domestic battery purpose of the section is to prevent the police getting on to take statements in the corners of the atmosphere of the station on this was not that sort of situation the victim's car which is on the i believe the driver's seat and the threshold of the car is a match and they have it's within a sextillion percentage point and then he says in regards to the defen lived where anywhere near market he i didn't know he did not live near the location where the abandoned it and he also somehow left in the victim's car when there is testimony that he did not know the victim and provides no even reasonable or robbery confessions and the first of those armed robbers were allowed to show that this confession falls in this instance wouldn't it be more reliable if you could say one of those
the cartoons that he either animated or directed are now considered classic and today on today's show we are going to show you four of them and boy i got to tell you these are really be these are really good  a little bit about bob crap and he was born let me get the date right man nineteen thirteen he died and nineteen eighty four good long life he started to animate right right out of school he just went to work right away to hollywood actually he know about mary melodies and that's where he got to start and he then oh and i must say that many of those cartoons that he did for what is now warner brothers are now considered american classics classics i mean if you if you're into animation you know bob clampett you just know his name right in there with tex avery and chuck jones and all the others in one nine h turned from doing animation to doing i really like them and i wish i could find them they would still be good today he toured college campuses towards the end of his life and lectured on the history of animation he just a real lover of animation so oh well at least up here if i don't have to learn about fight the winner of many blue ribbon is trained to perform in every game first let's see you do a tr here is a group of cute little piggies playing in the but are they up to they seem fascinated by that oh well here's a proud mother hen carefully the edge of the woods field mice make their home here we see one of the most common time say he seems to be a bit more tell me a little fellow what seems to be troubling you i don't know  tell me is it true that the cat takes good care of you and keeps you nice and warm well that's truly your friendship now before we leave you is there anything that you would like to say to your friends in the audience
reducing that money and so if you say you know what i want to hear from you all as the light of that money when you depend against which we've done the ma looks like well rather than fight the liens i said ok i'll just take them i'll just pursue this against and a calm and i'm i'm rather than wait until after this was all done to
regard to the i p l the evidence in this case was that the defendant was but he had to say there was a great deal either asked why was he in the neighborhood a neighborhood that he didn't leave and he was he was at the curb at the end to the wrong house trying to get the drag that he was talking and the date the court will stand recessed
did not indicate in order that your client was only to report for a period of ten years and then after which is name was to be removed from the registry was never right that's correct yes if the trial court actually indicated in an order that your client's name was to be removed from the registry then you would have more not the maintenance of the name or the elimination of your client's name from the registry so i guess the is to simply trying to determine according to sorrell whether or not there's a continuing duty to report is is you guys are supposed to interpret this to be what i want to meet so i can get really and i'm just kind of wondering i don't think that's what mandamus otherwise it would be sexual a sex offender completed that period of time what happens after that is there to be in removal of the individual's name from the registry have there been and that's an affirmative act by his faith what about the root of the simply the continued existence of the individual's name on the registry we're talking about the act of sponge money so is there a rule on the lines of what something that's that's my question to you is that done for those individuals that have been identified accurately as sex offenders they have reported through the period of you would disagree with the statute d requires i espied to maintain the database and maintain the database who's removing names from th register for two years and ten years expired in that person's name was not removed from the database and a mandamus was filed like in this case would we be
cars they would get out their clubs start holding them and hitting them someone would run some would run away others would scream i saw all of that in just one of the one stores and i watched everything through the store after having witnessed this he was not i have not argued that your honor because if it was i mean he's an adult he did suffer that in the past from his family but i don't know that that would be well would ordinarily be assigned to protect citizens or country yet he could certainly not turn to them for protection based upon his knowledge that the of what they did to persons like him and the fact that   should be protecting him extorted money from him and he has seen that they will go to further expense and inflict harm upon gays he'd certainly have substantially more than one in  which which which i'll get to now he was picked on and hit by his fellow students and i think that's really not more than you expect any students to do when you're at the hands of mean spirited students and i think if you would mr cornell statement that his teachers did not help him for about that well i don't think that the board specifically addressed the issue so i think it is in this case so i think they did that you would if you didn't agree with the press persecution determination but again the past persecution determination is well supported by the record you don't have persecution respect you being to believe that he would be harmed and you say that all that he experienced from the police up to that point and extortion but based on what he had seen happening to other people who are in the same situation as him yeah yeah
later and with that gap in medical treatment records there be no nothing a doctor could do by granting an opinion i mean it would not be helpful to substantiate your  you come within that duty to us this is a requirement that is necessary but if necessary get a medical opinion if necessary to substantiate the claim if a medical opinion is necessary to substantiate the claim they want to provide you agree with that though and that as a general proposition are these the classic facts where medical opinion would be necessary because without a doctor telling  they can connect this to this how else could you do it there is evidence of sickle cell anemia for a long time there is a gap then there's evidence of subsequent symptomology there is because of the money of the claim herself without a guard there how could the claimant ever under the circumstances supply shipment without a medical opinion ever well we're all right i think it's important to point out that this case as opposed to the disability upon which a discretionary decision to order or not order a medical exam and debate the right i don't believe that i don't believe that is the basis for another word in the medical examination test is whether there is a reasonable possibility
identify yourselves before you start and with respect to the day calendar i'll let the lawyers know when they have a minute left of their time darvill versus bar nineteen under these circumstances we think there are at least two extraordinary and unique factors that demonstrate why this court should grant mr garbos emergency motion to be released from the tension and light of court if it does to suit you to keep the people do we know why he got the pardon there any indication in the record of the governor's reasoning or what in the in the record i guess or in the public record yes your honor different on the other on the other hand as the immigration judge noted there were repeated arrests i mean there there were dispositions i guess in part because of his age but there are there are there were repeated robberies all in order to adjust status he also statutorily eligible for voluntary departure at minimum and the part in it changes the discretionary calculation for all of his forms of the levy and it's because of the strong to where i started in other words this motion to reopen would would likely court or would likely occur after she had been while he was and can be after he'd been been sent to in this case should deny his request because he has failed to demonstrate both that his attention right this is national claim and that extraordinary circumstances exist that limits the grants of what about could you address the pardon i mean why does agreeing to stay the briefing and so if the government's willing to stay the briefing of the petition why wouldn't the government agree to remove all until on to could be decided shouldn't why shouldn't he be in why shouldn't he be in the country while they're doing that rather than than in gambia without any means necessary means of returning what may well this is going on why shouldn't he be within the united states motion is pending it hasn't been as unity to it yet and so if this court were to deny a grant a stay then i said plan accordingly but in intel then the fact that a motion to reopen pending not give and  then it would be appropriate for us to grant the stay if we if everything you just said we disagreed with in terms of the merits of the petition then it would on i mean i think that's the point you're trying to make was that is that the fact that he might have been pardoned doesn't necessarily guarantee and that he's pointed at the adjustment that and that he seeks through by doing the reopening required is significantly lower in terms of the balancing of the equities instead of there being an extreme hardship bar that needs to be met that for me becomes a positive actually in his favor so the court would not only be looking at the fact  would those would all become an actor to play against any concerns regarding his criminal record and they would account for the pardon in terms of this case this case has an advance order that the government consented to and that makes it where you work that out if you don't work it out back here you know you're on it i think that would be something to know that there are other processes involved when ice and petitioners disagree about conditions
coming after one i think they're coming after child which is a little different but the average layperson see something coming at you and i was just trying to gauge what that's caden and stuff going out in front of you left right i around him to be less than credible when he describes the incidence of crossing the line having to take a bit of action because the guy barreling down and that's a want to encourage the series to do we don't want to punish them this guy was driving recklessly speedy rest
to put in you know various affidavits and maybe didn't understand what an affidavit was but all that he's put in so far is that he heard that there was somebody coming out everywhere somebody told him and then he went to because it would you then be looking at the state department reports and things like that which appeared to be this is a major outfit and is there significant persecution of assad members hydrating we saw members even in the immigration judge said  the immigration judges statements made him go to whether he was subjected among other things to an appropriate level of threat to qualify for  will help me with the facts there are two incidents that he now claims show a basis for his field of persecution the first one was this rally at which the police shot at people and this and he didn't get shot and the second was when there was this meeting and they burn down the bus a mob or things  are not the place that you should have offered this you should have offered this thing we don't take evidence as we know and he shouldn't put it at the same level and so my question is the fact that the honor with all due respect and let me explain why i'm not sure on that your honor exactly captures what the b o i a said i think what they said is not that tape and we're not the people to give this information to the same view of being a poet responsibility with respect to the immigration judge and it was proceeding on the understanding that there was a basis for concluding when one of the member of  right there is much more to this case than the soft membership and once you get by death by the government respectfully submit that there are substantial evidence in this record again as understood by him in twelve fifty two
i don't know if you haven't noticed a lot of these local bands play cover music they don't want to cover music i want to reach anality so often i get very frustrated just trying to find groups that can just be original you know and not just do cover versions you know karaoke and carers and well maybe a lot of people who care i don't so  goodness me so i thought it would be fun to do a show of if i'm going to do three or four of these where it's sort of retro i'm going to go back in time and look for the rogues from times past and i do mean great rogues so today we've got a great show and stout old man this is classic stuff from the past these are the kind of people that people like to imitate even to this day but these are all the we've got the winner sisters it's everything musical form that you could possibly think of but together now these films are in the public domain which is the reason why i can do it and there was a company way back in the late thirt and forty's and they would put out what they call sounded so when you went into a bar it would be this video player film player and you put a quarter in and you could watch what you're incarnations of the same thing this was a regional and most people you know they could go out and you know go to new york or chicago or st louis to see fats waller so this was the way that they got to see him and then over time because the machines when you know i mean lost interest in television showed up this is pre television these films slip into the public domain which gives me ray pleasure to bring them to you and by the way this show in its entirety i dedicate to the public domain so you can pass on this amazing goodness of all these great performers from the past so here we go i'm d road you're in for a good ride here we go oh don't know  to be a beautiful home and look at the position of your legs
injury caused by militias prosecution must occur during the policy period not that the tour must be completed during the policy period and that that is going to be the stumbling block i think for everyone particular case we head toward that even one of the courts says hi and to try to be specific in answering your questions you can't be a prerequisite because malicious prosecution is made up of five golems there's not a prerequisite that's going to bishop priest that's basically sending the ships that says his city prosecutors are going to hold people in jail until his insurance coverage and it can't it also is going to assume and race and to keep it even during discuss this if an insurance company is approached by a sitting and says no we don't have insurance right now we're going to get some insurance you're going to get our number of questions if you answer better but then redo mr going back to pointing out what i think everybody would agree is that you have a very unusual torture that's what the seventh circuit said cornerback to them he said normally the torch is done when you get to the injury this is the only case where the injury is general liability section that says that the personal injury offense of malicious prosecution must be committed while this agreement is in effect so it isn't that instructed me why do you think the language is different well do you think it is we should reach the same result regardless of whether the policy says that the injury must happen during the policy period or that the offense misspeak committed during the policy period between the injury and the liability the tour and the completed tour and which prosecution in this case provides the vehicle for them to recover for the injury but it is the injury that the policies provide coverage for so it's prosecution but the one force one liability section provides coverage for damages caused by the wrongful is there a difference between saying the offensive malicious prosecution and the wrongful act of malicious prosecution for ya think there's a meaningful difference between requiring the offense or the lawful i think either
the case may be this is continuing to produce a way every time they do that it's a pilot you know that pretty green and that allows us to either you can say is a continuing ensure the supreme court