our cases seem to hold of that the mere transfer from one prison to another does not qualify as a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of the  they are challenging the legality or the duration of their confinement and particularly in situations like this a challenge or just a disciplinary proceeding is only proper if the petitioner has lost good time credits him i challenge is no right place for him and that that makes your argument a little less persuasive than if there's no interest there were never your honor prisoners who are challenging display mary proceedings or specific types of discipline do you have significant remedies within the bureau of prisons process they can file an administrative remedy challenging the disciplinary proceeding they can then appeal the fi on that and if they're not pleased with the appellate process within the bureau they can then ask for further investigation by the office of the inspector general here at the specific claims that mr fear you know is alleging regarding his disciplinary proceeding and the incident complaint that he knew what a bit in this case was and that he explicitly decided to not fire on because who would you respond to opposing counsel on the bostic case yes your honor that hideous would be proper if it affected the duration of the individual's confinement and here that is simply not the case moreover as petitioners counsel mentioned there may be hay vs jurisdiction where a case involves a quantum change in status now as the court engram vs bro in defined a quantum change that is the difference between essential freedom or being on parole and solitary confinement here mr fear was only transferred from a low security prison to a medium security prison that is simply not a quantum change in his status moreover your counsels or did mention that on occasion apparently he was put in solitary do you agree with that o your honor i would like to address that point and in fact while we don't necessarily have the record verifying that that was true even if that was true even if this court takes it as true that mr fear was put in solitary confinement at victor bay he in fact chose to file a separate haiti as action regarding his treatment at victor bill including his time in solitary confinement your honor at this hideous petition is soley regarding the actions of the guards at m c i ashland your honor that case was dismissed and mr fieri don't chose to not appeal it however there is a rd case and that rd case was mr fear read out challenging his classification as a medium of custody score christer that case was in fact any difference to the law here well in cases where a petitioner such as this one is simply challenging his custody score security classification then we would agree that  well if your honor there may be situations where certain constitutional crimes fall outside the scope of the st step act however that is not the case here as mr period i was simply challenging his disciplinary proceeding at kentucky and his change from a low security prisoner to a medium security prisoner which as mentioned is actually being challenged in a subsequent appeal not before this patio yes your honor that's correct however that case was briefed on the merits and substantial information was provided to show that mr fear you know was properly classified not based or you know that there's there's just you know bad people in the president and they're doing this to and make them they're running yet in a way that is violating people's rights you know that are are you saying that could never be reached that it think you know it's not really saddest factory thought that there would be nothing if something like that it just gives well your honor in cases like that where there has been widespread inappropriate actions by guards or by the bureau inmates have been able to file class actions which a large direct constitutional violations however this is not a case without the appropriate warden of victor hill which is in california but the complaint seems to be directed toward activities at ashland and you heard counsel's argument about ashleigh what's your response oh your honor its  yes your honor it's up about the well it's about the behavior of certain individuals that f b i ashland that is correct and ok thank you means that as a result of the transfer it was placed into our security more restricted prison