despite having passed for promotional exams for the rank of sergeant and never being promoted although i have never done anything that would warrant such never been arrested modified nor suspended so it's no legitimate reason for my career advancement being halted despite that in two thousand and eleven i was allowed to take the lieutenant exam but subsequently i was refused that right in two thousand and fifteen and also two thousand and seventeen for the stop in my career advancement my cases against the new york city patrolman and benevolent association when a long time member as i mentioned for the last two years i've been a member without fail in nonstop continuously  union and had made payments induced to doctor for my celery each and every pay period throughout my entire membership which has never been breached my choice for the membership into the union was for service to be provided a member of the service to be provided by the unions to be reasonable and fair i wasn't provided with any reasonable representation for my employment discrimination claims and also i wasn't provided any fair representation in regard to my employment discrimination claims is a fear that as a longtime member i have to pay out of pocket to other entities to receive representation for a service which i'm paying the union to represent me for  no is it fair that the union should deny me a right to do such i have a filed a complaint in regard to my employment discriminations i'm sorry what was that number again how many six six in total and the six complain and you know this is the claims in the gripes that i have the three points that i mentioned have been breach to breach the contract in par and whole is still a breach of contract and you know i have not received fair or reasonable representation from the union felony stealing department traffic summonses which is a misdemeanor as a result i receive department charges for his actions he admitted to internal affairs division that he broke into my locker after his incident it was instructed the actually every all members of the command were instructed by that delegate not the delegates of the command that they were not to be seen speaking to me and if they were seen speaking to me i would they would be effected from the union and i was referred to as a rat creating a hostile work environment which was one of my employment discrimination claims the union is directly responsible for creating such employment discrimination against me been asked repeatedly in the district court and now today to identify a contract provision that requires the union to provide counsel at the union's expense to prosecute an individual employment discrimination claim he has an identified one in this complaint he didn't identify one and this is district court and he cannot identify one today for the simple reason that none exist and he hasn't identified anyone who was provided counsel by the union to pursue an individual discrimination claim so absent a contractual provision that requires the union to provide counsel at the union's expense for individual employment discrimination claims there can be no breach of contract is there any just curious and i don't think it's in the record in this case but is there any mechanism within for helping to address the problems that officer stat has identified well officer staton did attach to his complaint and it is in our supplemental appendix a news article from a bulletin that says if you're having problems you can contact the union in the union will put you in touch holmes in regard to what the counsel is stating there continues violation doctrine applies and i do invoke it in regard to disguise in regard to this incident to happen in two thousand and eight i still suffer the ramifications to this da where is people who are employed even those who were not employed by the n y p d refuse to speak to me because i've been labeled as a rat and in fear of them being ejected from the union should they be seen consorting with me to still creates a hostile work environment as a direct result of this action the union rather hire this gentleman here as counsel in order to defend them against a union member instead of providing the service that i union member and fact entitled to and what he says is dissembling behavior further proof that discrimination exists i've gone to the union countless numbers of times they never directed me to any council whether i had to pay out of pocket or not the council i paid out of pocket for misrepresented me i had to find  my own council wanted nothing to do with me they said i have a union of a union member entitle to service which i have not received and i would like to say that the case was dismissed in the district court without first going to discovery the discovery would allowed a lot of information that would have provided further proof of my case and further stating what the council is alluding to which is not the true all ingredients were provided to present the prime of pressure case the union's treatment towards me is arbitrary and capricious where is kenneth boss he was represented criminally by the union for the killing of on a man not only do they represent him criminally which is understood that's the jew duty and you know of the un to do but they represented him and got to motion as well findings than the fact that in favor of pelee pellant an alternative of the court should remain the case for a fair and impartial trial before a prejudice jury and proper evidence and under current struction