been low especially as i've a very long saga in the california courts and now the district court her story is set forth in the papers it has been well publicized but essentially what it boils down to admissions about judge trammell that were in the papers that he had filed before where he said i didn't have sex with her i did have sex with her i was forced to have sex with her by that five my fear of the mafia all these various things that i mean i've said this in papers in the stake work but it was very powerful when when our president or former president bill clinton said i did not have sex with that woman in the later later they can he had to go back on that statement and still to this day he lives in disgrace of that is that statement the judge trammell has said  that the evidence about the prior acts with the women should get into their evidence code for fifteen federal evidence code for fifteen whereas in the state court it's discretionary it's management prior sex acts and the evidence code for fifteen get it in federal court whereas they don't but the county certainly could not control him because they had no power over him  they found that he was not an employee and the test for determining whether he was an employee was whether they had the power to direct to provide control his activities and they found the county did not but it doesn't go down the way that you could you employer you have to have among other things ability to control but you could have ability to control without being employed i think that if you are a sub contractor brought in to manage the work force for employer they had to find that he was not under the control of the county but my point above and beyond all of that is that this issue has already been decided in the state courts and a question yes if if you go to the last page of exhibit exhibit one i believe it's page thirty one on the beginning of that first whole paragraph as in workers compensation lot a key issue in determining employers vicarious liability for a public simply public employees contact it's control the state had exclusive control over trammell no authority for the alternative claim that it was a joint service where we are going plaintiff argue that he county supervisors and control judge trammell yes i do believe that in that i worked in the state court system for a lot of years how are you going to pull that rabbit out of the house i don't think the rabbits in there to start with because of the facts of this particular case where in this i think i think at some point what what what we have to say as a society is that if the judge is out there doing anything he feels like and everybody in the whole course just knows it and they're controlled by the county and their date they have the county people that they can go timeframe where they controlled money they controlled various things it was different and all the stuff was presented below but it's not as significant now however at that we had the rules were different and they had at least the ability to have  control duel supervision and because of the money going from the county that's one of the determinative is something employees or somebody controlling is somebody supervising and whether or not it's done whether or not someone has fired a judge on the county level doesn't mean that it shouldn't happen and that's the kind of lawsuit that's the kind of proof that i think that would have to be revised says judge drama you're fired that's absolutely like like the proverbial tree in town in the fall makes no sense on just family you know i would i would hope that that if i knew about that i would run on him but that's that's that's neither here nor there that's what that is my point about where where do we draw like who do we find responsible and i believe that the county had enough supervisory power supervisory knowledge otherwise we will never have any public entity liable for any judge because they're you know this branch of government why do you want your shot to get the state i'm sorry there was a shot of the state last but you had your opportunity that that is not all this there's never an opportunity to hold any in any government office lockable but that's that's what i'm that's that is where i'm going with that was to point out if it's the only hope one entity