if the court the side in that particular case their parties can not make joint decisions because of their inability to have a constructive relationship in that neither be jointly or one of the any decision making responsibilities the statutes then guide us then to another another place which talks about you know a parent who is not awarded significant parity responsibilities all should be awarded reasonable parenting time ok as you talk about statue the way to these statues have been constructed that the court does need to make a finding as to why based on the preponderance of evidence we're going to restrict this curious decision making responsibilities otherwise you have to go to as well to the parenting time statute which basically says that there's a presumption that both parents are fit and if both parents are fit the court cannot and shall not least place any restriction on parenting to the time as defined by section six and so you off lower arguing that there was a restriction placed and that doesn't speak very well for your client ability to work with the mother in this case to make joint decisions do you agree with that i would agree that the the weight of the guardian evidence report would read that way however i think there that there was supposed to be some type of restriction but you don't see in her report the necessary findings or the necessary information that would show that this child has been in some way endangered by mr grimm either by his you know emotional physical you even one of these parents raise i would say a very serious concern in terms of the healthy the welfare of this minor child the thing which you see underlying this report is that you do have a very healthy child a healthy child who was raised for at least a rd of her life by her father at home he was a stay at home dad for the st year she seems to be very very well adjusted which then begs the question to them why didn't the guardian ad litem make recommendations in terms of restriction what is it that is so objectionable about m child standard i would agree that the court could based on all of those other factors make a determination as to what did and what is in the best interest of the child but this restriction was called in here so that we don't have situations where just parents are stri of you know rights to their children rights to the decisions for their children rights to be involved in the way that the statute suggests that they're supposed to be involved which is to maximize the relationship with you the parent child the presumption that the parents are fit so when you pull all of those rights those things therefore this court should make the following presumptions under the landmark followers st so bryant supreme court case this court to suit the evidence was sufficient and it supported the judgment in every way in particular those court should assume that the judgment is sufficient that the evidence is sufficient to support the judgment on point that what the th court decided was in the best interests of this dollars ten cents worth that standard does not say that the court must find serious and dangerous to reduce parenting time or parental responsibility it does say that if it that if the court does follow substantial impingement then it can reduce parenting time decision making responsibility the best interest of the child is in play  so for all we know and again should be presumed to go to trial court may be fine use the trial that are just in the statu of course we have no trial transcript we don't and then the part of the party gets a period of time to respond if they don't respond are they do respond with a different report and their understanding are amendments and you can agree upon those then you go to the below has no ability to make the other party cooperate with respect to my father's record all you can do is and i do recall your time about that you were asking us to make them cooperate with you that's not  mean these parties couldn't agree to anything because the worker grito bystanders report either so your only recourse was to actually ask the circuit court for a hearing to decide that issue not to get the parties to agree here cooperate but just decide the issue and that's how you get a certified report before us otherwise we are really left in the dark and we had to rely almost