the investigation in this case there was no such finding that that's the finding was i find that there are many false statements and i can't disregard those statements there's nothing essentially to distinguish this case from the u s being managed in that case to the district court judge down that i do believe that she knowingly lied on the stand simple finding of a lie is not enough to make adequate findings to increase for obstruction of justice when dealing with both statements to either law enforcement or to a court but i think this court should go and reach the big decision and that is that there are insufficient evidence based on his record to enhanced for obstruction of justice when you have statements to law enforcement at the time of the arrest there has to be an actual impediment to the investigation here there is absolutely no in this court actually commented that this type of lie actually helped out in the investigation because they were able to confirm that the person that the defendant was sane as was in jail so in fact the lies helped the investigation they when they went and interviewed a person and she she did not knowing where this child was well it took them two extra days to find the child the investigation was hampered in some way another time and the thought lied about his criminal history car but again it just it lacks the that the fact then discovering the lies helped the prosecution rather than hindered it there's no different way this prosecution would have four times a week but let me and i'm someone that's an issue isn't there a difference between forcing the government to do more work because a from confusion mistake or faulty memory she does acknowledge that but in this case there were so many false statements and really specific statements that the defendant made that were outright lies even to the point where and i  an implication of the extent and significance of her lies even to the point where her mother in law i e adele or being out and out it was forced i'm going to testify that she wasn't telling the truth i think and i find there's the word find if we're going to insist on stop you there because it seems to me the hallmark of the particular closing argument once the law and so a lot of the investigation helped the connection the fact that she told lies was used by the prosecution in a significant measure to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty so it actually her lies actually assisted you in convicting a writer seems to me i mean whatever your life is i think that's kind of like a slippery slope because that would mean any time that it ran there's a rattle in the door a member the left rear door that was peculiar in that she should have found have had she brought the check and that the other strong sense of air freshener from the back up that began and i think that is strong independent evidence of her guilt separate apart from border crossing case that we see so often i would submit that one of the reasons is because of the fact that she lied at primary then she posed to rest actually admitted a number of those lies and then still proceeded to lie and lie again so we perhaps where we might only have had she come clean like should be mentioned earlier we would not have had a significant investigation as a result of that but she then turned took it upon herself to lie mislead us yet again and say no i actually wasn't in mexico for three hours i was visiting my ex husband raimundo well i don't think i don't think you know sort of really he's been in jail and you had to go find that out do you really think the officers believed her i mean i you know i don't know i mean that's kind of the inference is i didn't i mean it was impeded anyway probation department clue there was no obstruction the government never filed objections to that probation report and it was only in its infancy memorandum filed the few days before sentencing that they even brought up the if structure of justice lasted several weeks the record doesn't support that first of all as to the regarding the ex husband in this thing provided the date of birth that could have been done that was discovered through  once or twice he ran the text reports that day that they had the rest of the found find out about the car and he found out about the husband by simply running a record checks with the name and date of birth given by this thing