immigration judge as misinformation or advised that he did not have a strong asylum claim and that he did provide country conditions evidence because if you claim about the treatment of indigenous people in guatemala how do you how do you address the prevent him from presenting his testimony if the judge the i j a did say to them at some point tell me what persecution you were mistreatment you suffered because you're half indigenous  all that he said was well i have i'm short my stature is short so a lot trying to figure out how it was prevented from testifying about about his claims that he was persecuted because he was mistreatment you you suffered because you were half indigenous the judge was clearly aware of the parentage stuff because you mentioned earlier the mothers the mothers heritage and the fathers and mr mr  said something about being sure the judge asked a different question which is all right now what persecution have you had because you're indigenous and then he then went into the gang trued so i'm trying to figure out why he was prevented from testimony and then also he's talking about how the people are indigenous how they you know they spend his brother away because of his family he also says things like people in my own race they bother  interview the that was never developed in the rafters so there are there can be more than one reason the protecting ground has to be the central reason and that was developed c here in this testimony in part because of the limited as half indigenous on his father's side and have non indigenous on his mother's side we know that because she immediately clarified it on the record after the mistranslation mr lopez identified on appeal to the court and we know that because she said it correctly her decision at the end of the hearing and there is really no question on this record that the immigration judge did question mr lopez in a way that would have allowed him to testify they say he had been targeted i did in his people because of the non indigenous side of his heritage she asked him do you believe anyone has ever physically harmed you because of racism or because you're a half indigenous mr lopez argues that that question wasn't sufficient because you had a physically harmed you because of racism or because you have indigenous but even if the court doesn't agree with the government on either of those two points there was no prejudice in this case because mr lopez was given a fair opportunity to tell the immigration judge that the gay members who targeted him had a motive against him is not indigenous heritage that was the argument he said on appeal to the court he hadn't gotten to tell the immigration judge about but for example when the game want to target you in your friends and then she followed the again were there any other reasons is mr lopez believe that he didn't targeted by indigenous gang members because of his non indigenous  the mistranslations charge our case our case law seems to say that if there is a mistranslation if there's a reasonable possibility that it could have affected the outcome but have to show you don't have to show prejudice with precision at most and at least this record is somewhat confusing in terms of mr lopez's answers why don't why don't we just send it back to make sure that just the idea gets it right well you are for a couple of reasons st of all while mr lopez and his group to this court discusses other issues in the record for example he says that at about harmless by forging out the record as a whole and therefore arguing that this particular take it in the context of the record as a whole may have prejudiced it i'm not sure what's wrong with incidents in the transcript those are purportedly other errors the fact that the teleconferencing system filled for one page for example doesn't explain how mistranslation here is that a or or could have changed the let me let me ask a question about something specific the judge said in her finding she said the respondent did not indicate that the gangs targeted him targeted him because there was a digitas race but instead it indicated that they gang members themselves were mostly indigenous so it seems to me that she understood his claim as being based on in his indigenous race as opposed to his half indigenous race in her decision she may have asked questions along the way that targeted him because of how he dressed because they wanted to recruit him because his soccer team had won trophies because of his spanish language skills that was the cleaning maids the immigration judge that was the claim the immigration judge adjudicated and  challenges the merits of the decision that the immigration judge actually rendered on the record before now you're right that the immigration judge in her oral decision to do a few places says indigenous instead of non indigenous but that can't show