were issued the first circuit in u s versus bird found that again using the term common sense would indicate that persons or sexually or sit in children a likely also be inclined or predisposed to order or receive child law was desirable because evidence suggests that pedophiles use child pornography has to do with other children into sexuality citing one attorney general's commission on pornography final report six forty nine nineteen eighty six that is but one of the reports and   footnote one of lists i will read aside from the question of its use for probable cause peer subject based on your argument based on your theory every time that someone is accused or charged or arrested for child molestation  that was settled or established and i think you are arguing the good faith exception that it is a good for them and i'm at the point of the connection you're saying there is a connection and my my question is if that's so if we were to rule here that you are right there is a connection between these two things that means that every police officer in the virgin islands will be able to go to house and search for child circuit held moreover through the x extent that hudson and four also suggest that evidence of a defendant's tendency to sexually abuse or spoiled children is irrelevant to the probable cause analysis re and also did refer to frist certain case u s versus byrd common sense would indicate that a person who essentially interested in children is likely to also be appeals in agreement is unreasonable and that the good faith reliance does agree here i'm not arguing whether one side is right or wrong i'm already saying there is a disagreement among there has been no allegation of recklessness no allegation of made of a material fact no  and the police conduct in this case was not reckless grossly negligent and there was police and again analysis is whether or not the exclusionary rule here would deter deliberate are courts that have held that such a nexus is intuitive it would be really harsh to hold the officer to be able to question the judge it's not the fault of the police officer police officer had the right in this case to rely on if i think that there is a as a police officer there is a strong nexus between dealing in drugs and having guns  does that mean that when i am searching for drugs i can also do your theory start searching for guns maybe open drawers and searching pockets and so forth once again with all due respect to the court those are not the fact molestation or enticement and possession of child pornography that's what the court said and the court upheld i believe a search warrant in that case because of the relationship and i would have to disagree you disagree with this decision i can understand  disagree but but it's a decision that's there but and that is by a court of appeals and how can you say that the officers in this case were reckless when there is this and say however there was a good faith exception in this case because there was no suggestion that doesn't that mean that we have decided this case is ok but here after all decision in the third circuit the police officer acted in good faith reliance on the judge's issuance of the warrant a warrant bears the burden of proving by the preponderance of the evidence that the affidavit contained deliberate or reckless false information or material omission general and that believed that providing that in addition to the testimony children sense i believe