rights law call this meaningful order and as always i'll start by reading the agenda the other is one piece of business on our docket for tonight which is the request by a group called forty one all the same project that we did a preliminary hearing on a couple months ago this is a project to repurpose the existing garage in the sawmill as a seventeen thousand six hundred square foot grocery store at three sixty four vermont route fifteen in the village center zoning district and the other only other puff piece of public business that we have is to approve minutes of our previous meeting and we have the option to go to deliberative session after this but i think it's probably not going to be necessary will see how it goes just right there right at the outset i'll tell people that we got a communication from the applicant that they wish to continue once we once we had an open hearing and were immediately going to cantor team the notion of doing a lot of didn't continue and so that's why there's fewer people here than you might expect all right so that's the agenda let's say since we so i just want to make of the of the as usual official notifications that this meeting will run in consistent with these rules of procedure we have written rules and they're available to anyone who would like a copy of them at this time i want to officially request disclosure of any conflicts of interest for any ex parte communication with board members ok thank you i need to explain the interested persons rules but in this case i think that there no one here who they would who there's any question about so i think i will skip it for this for tonight for the first time in my career in this chair and i also normally remind people to sign on the attendance sheet but again that's moot judicial hearing which means that everyone who wants to participate has to be sworn in again i believe this is moot but just hereby swear that the evidence i give in the cause under consideration shall be the whole truth and nothing but the truth under the pains and penalties of perjury i didn't mean to do ok so the applicant has asked for a continu motion ok so we have a so is there any discussion on this well i have a couple of questions regarding the traffic study i mean can that read supposed to review and approve the street before we can grant approval yeah so you're in your deal you're talking about that so i know the street approval part of it is an interlocking thing that we that we can't if that didn't happen before in the woods before the close of it we would have to continue until it was right have that stuff now the course there could be could there karl probably questions that we're going to want to ask based on the traffic study korean and or the independent review and one of the where this isn't really a meeting procedural question but we do want to we do we need to decide who we might need testimony from when we continue to hearing so for example if we decide that we need testimony from the traffic person who did the test the technical review for us if we need to do any from them we can ask for them to be here or we can ask them in writing either way so we probably should talk about what those things are if you have to look at ok is there anything else that people want to bring up before lee before we can make a decision whether to continue  so what this procedurally we're going to do here is to continue which we we i brought this meeting to order this is the new business on it so we've we've begun consideration of this what a continuation does is we is this meeting stays officially open and we come back on that date and pick it up or we left off now of course because we're not you know we're not really making any progress on it today at the applicant request we're going to mostly just pick up fresh on that on that other date but nonetheless it's officially open because this is the date it was warned for so we're not going to reward what we're doing is we're taking the war and meaning stopping it and then starting it again  certain so that's that that's just a procedural difference in case anyone's wondering and we will send courtesy notices to the letters again puts down front porch more on the agenda will be posted so where can you give a name for the record i'm sorry after katherine so them they're very approved for publication as written often there are many as a minute at this time ok that's all the business that we have does anyone still we need to go to a deliberative session i don't think it's really appropriate at this point  don't really have anything to deliberate this piece of business on the of jericho market we've closed person night so we're not going to discuss it we're not to take any more testimony on this but that has to pick up now on the