no reasonable person could have reached the decision rendered by the board of immigration appeals based upon the evidence in the record the errors of the b i a are profoundly disturbing and in our opinion compelled this court to reverse that decision to grant asylum from ethiopia with the from distinguishing harassment from persecution and secondly it's told the lions from one fragment of a us department of state report ignoring not only the rest of the report and the context but the other evidence in the record the other mistakes are characterizations of the testimony which have no basis in fact these specific issues it's a disturbing mechanical blindness to the human context of what understandably that this young man to flee ethnic well number one as a matter of law they incorrectly stated that he had to demonstrate both persecution from ethiopia and they were a trio eritrea was properly considered as a discretionary issue with respect  constitutes a form of acute persecution i would bring your attention to the decision an aha marie which talks about a very similar situation involving palestinians who threw weight in the aftermath of a much more acute ethnic cleansing and this court took into consideration that there had been a horrific ethnic cleansing that has occurred and that less acute forms of persecution were c primarily economic and they are recognised that there's actually been a new constitutional government in power here we have one thousand two hundred ethnic arijit chains and he feels in verity enough many still in jail we have no change in government whatsoever we have the nationality issue and we saw it and evidence from the state department report they relied on indicating that ethiopians very serene ethnicity can float and if they leave they can't come back persecution shia militia flee and i would also take note of the fact that this event had just all the focus on the one fragment the state department report there is not one state and that state department report aside from distinguishing state sponsored from private forms of economic persecution there was another focus and that was on the correct up of the appropriate evidence that the court is supposed to look at with the u decisions the other documents that they rested on if you look at the decision by the b r c a there is no reference whatsoever to any of the other evidence submitted which not only showed that the  continue but that other forms of problems were occurring that the nationality issue was not resolved in essentially that there was a ceasefire and that one aspect clearly did improve but not the overall situation and use that it's a proposition which has no basis so in other words the b r c a blindly mechanically took one piece of a state department report without looking at the context of the report itself which show that wasn't supported by the other part of the same report and in no way looked at and any of the other evidence which i we have cited are great which showed the problems continued and philosophically and from public from public policy point of view and i  assume that was taken in consideration in the homily after it an extreme form of ethnic cleansing that occurred human nature and understanding human societies there's a common sense understanding that the situation isn't going to magically improve in the problems are going to rise and that there's going to be additional deference to victims of that nick cleansing because of age and parents understanding that ethnic cleansing necessarily means deep seated forms of john lee from the department of justice here i'm a half of the respondents attorney general the board's determination that the petitioner fail to establish a well founded fear of future persecution in ethiopia is supported by substantial record evidence which this court must defer to the b add a decision should be continued abuses of human rights but then the situation had started to improve after the theft action of hostilities agreement was signed that the petitioner here have to still have the burden of proof of stablish meaning that he has some kind of tie or connection to these types of of abuse that are going on challenge he does not challenge the force the station that he did not suffer past persecution he struck he says that he's trying to establish that he has a reasonable are well founded fear of public future persecution now he and he testified that he was told that his sister was arrested because of her mixed ethnicity and that he had gone into hiding and left the country out of caution however outbreak of the war news that things got worse but he gave no specific examples of how things how life got worse for him in ethiopia and just said that he came home one day his sister was missing and he was told that and to a lesser degree made these arguments before the immigration judge and before the board and actually presented no evidence of any kind of direct economic  read that the state department report it's basically reporting on these twelve hundred people who had been and who were in and in in term and camps were people who had been arrested or detained while the war was going still going on and at the end of the year in dismember of two thousand and when the state department report this covers the conditions up to the end of the year it would be surprising if in that short period of time from when there actually was have been that the cessation of hostilities agreement that that you would actually see an immediate change show that he had to have a well founded fear of deportation in either your tree or ethiopia the country that he was he was ordered deported to was with ethiopia and and the reason that the discussion  actually doesn't have it  ethiopia the reason that that evidence was introduced concerning either trio was because of petitioners find that he the reason the whole reason that he feared going back