step up and i know there are several left police in this case i know i assume that you have worked out how you are going to split your time if you're going to split your time let us know when he will call the  right well thank you i think you can safely assume we're familiar with your briefs and you can begin anytime you wish process that it makes the order voidable but not quite and the reason that the trial court spent so little time and the justices have read the judge's opinion from the bench it's all of a page not that you can't give an opinion  suggesting that this because of the nature of the way the trial judge got to the fourteen zero one ruling that we really have a de noble review here yes your honor if this if this wasn't weighing some facts if this was having an evidentiary hearing where you actually are you sure you want that well your honor from this perspective doesn't it give us the opportunity to revisit the fraud issue your honor if if indeed or believe that that's something appropriate then the court will take that over sure except if you talk about eight months if you look at the floor space for example and that was a case where the party did not get notice that that was going to be an arbitration hearing and they only waited too long after they became aware of it to bring the petition and this  with a handwritten or although this particular one includes them down at the bottom off in the corner you really got to squint pretty hard to see that they're included in that when you get what you spend his argument all along point five million dollars loss this is not some sort of an attempt to all the sudden grab some monies here that otherwise you know would be a profit or some sort of a windfall that harris bank and the world would sleep with and one of their arguments is that that's our opinion that we lost out on the ability to deal with that in this why again the whole concept of we were trying something to move it sideways without somebody noticing when somebody stepped to the forefront commonwealth electrical and super  absolutely acknowledged and put them in and accepted them out of all of this process to suggest i think what his arguments is that here are in favor of granting the fourteen  none of those were determined whatsoever as far as we can tell from the judge's opinion even considered because he found as if threshold matter that because of the failure to serve the one notice of motion in motion on the attorney of mortgage foreclosure laws tempting to be final it wants finale this is titled for real property which is a it's something that is true well he understood the part that he could there was no way he was going to be able to hold the holding open the purchaser line but he a matter of fact offer if you read the final paragraph and i can read it but i don't and don't want to read the transcript for your honor it says that he says and i'm going to require a bond because he figured that he needed to replace the property that it been sold with some sort of way some sort of it was in legal air because of the boy versus avoidable and despite the fact that maybe we would end up that with the hearing of two fourteen zero one appropriately that's what we need to do here because then we can flesh out and see what the trial court's reasoning was and diligence y was always missing the cue that harris was seeking to deprive the whole town of its claim to the property and do you really believe that it was just just one of these really mammoth cases involving  lots of litigants lots of paperwork and you're suggesting that harris deliberately set out to carve out a situation where you would be deprived of a valid it may be a technicality but it's a very important one it and i don't think that you can suggest to think that you know that that possibility always exists that by the time you finish a case that the you know the money won't be there longer available with that with the building having already been sold i think the judge quinn believed that something was massively wrong here but there was a a high degree of likelihood that during term would be able to prosecute and recover stated as as our supreme court has stated that the mechanics we need a hack is an act that must be really construed to provide they please the court writers jim dash for property trusts your honour's center points position in this litigation or interest as litigation is very very limited and specific it is the undisputed third party bona fide purchaser of this property you're only here to make sure you don't get pulled back into the orbit right exactly your honor i don't think anybody wants you back at work and i would be very pleased   or reversed but we just don't want to get pulled in you know accidentally or because of some collateral argument that might result in that mean whatever the result whatever the fact of the center points from an entitled may accomplished i think gentleman that's probably the first result i've responded by saying well your honor if that's what you're going to order then i will respect it i saw it offer up a hand on the end the point you're making is that it's well there are it intil they have an absolute award of