entire ten minutes of my argument because this is a relatively limited argument very limited point of the law in this case turns on one thing which is  cults should be able to understand remember and carry out simple instructions at the time of the alleged onset mr felt was fifty nine years of age the judge limited him to  that would be listed as unskilled suited to the vocational experts testimony at the hearing and would preclude the past work the judge ruled that the felt if we do that how do we account for the fact that apparently mr feldstein the relevant time period was delivering sermons and writing a book i'm just going by and i whether you whether we should imply from dr cowen's record that he was limited to only simple instructions writing a book is something that can be done in brief increment it can be done examination that he had a problem with tyrannous and d overall problems with depression in general he reported that in general  sustain full time competitive employment beyond simple routine and repetitive and that's the issue it wasn't the dr col one at any time said he could at least perform simple routine and repetitive that wasn't the status examination he is supposed to by the regulations be given weight that's the statement he made and that's the difference it and even if it's not enough to limit him to unskilled work it is a factor that the l j had to a cult for in the r f c because even non civilian terminals have to be addressed in the residual functional capacity assessment it could have been enough to help desk he was was saying he has functioning the question is things such as stress levels his mood in general  everything that's in here that talks about what he does and doesn't do a stuff that can be done in short bursts but yet when he talks to him in detail  case that would turn on the mental impairment if he did not have the schisms the limitations there would be no case it is simply an issue of what limitations he has and whether those limitations would limit his ability to perform the two jobs that the vocational acts are experts cited and the l g a phone that he could perform saw and that his alleged depression immediately began with sort of a discussion a full discussion of the contents of dr cound report including his mental status examination noting that dr you record the beginning of that does say that mr felt should be able to understand remember and carry out simple instructions and then immediately after that it is followed in the same paragraph by a series of statements each of which indicates no limitation no limitation in the ability to work with others no limitation in attention and concentration no limitation work pace no limitation in the ability to respond to changes in the work the did not explicitly say the words i read these two statements concern but it is obvious from the context that that's what the elder it was doing moreover didn't stop there alleged concentration problems produced and the limitation noted that he said at the hearing sort of for the st time ever in the record because if you look at this record there is nothing in the record about concentration problems there's allegation of the hearing and that's pretty much it no it's his allegation but notes that he never told his doctors that his medications were causing concentration problems and that the records just didn't seem to support it he had about two years of therapy with mr miller following his release from prison and miss you know the l j did not cite that against mr felt's in any way except to note that the record did not support concentration problems right if you look and i encourage the court to look at that mr miller's notes because for mostly handwritten treatment notes they're relatively legible documents they don't document sort of the sort of that he was still doing computer work noted that part of the reason he wasn't able to work was that he couldn't get work if the cult he finding work because of his status as a felon now can she didn't you know there's a i think it's page nine hundred and eight of the record it's included three times in the record there's a treatment no thought i mr miller the therapist indicates that mr felt had been up for a job and had not gotten it because they had run a background check and that had presented so because the record is bereft of evidence that suggests concentration limitations and because we can tell from a commonsens that she read the disputed language harmoniously with the language that indicated no attention and concentration problems and because dr lefevre agreed and ultimately the district court agreed now that may not you know that's not the sort of end all be all of the analysis but everyone who has looked at this stuff far has agreed that the ale jay could reasonably have read the seven true to mean that no  indicate a level of limitation because they kind of are a collection of different kinds of concerns including the financial concern the dr cowen noted that mr felt's had so the fact that it's close enough to the wind the fact that  dooley in your brief identified some new regulations that took effect while this case has been pending concerning mental health issues do the new regulations actually matter here and i don't think they do except i wanted to bring them to the court's attention because dr lefevre opined under the old regulations and the ail j analyze the new regulations when determining to be criteria th  the the notion that the had to do something to dispel the possibility or address the possibility that the impairments in combination would give rise to a mental limitation it's not clear what the injury had to do more than already said the impairment was non severe she considered whether the evidence supported any concentration imitation included but it's not because the record overwhelmingly say that finding the one should be security says that mental impairment scores in relation to work are understanding remembering and carrying out simple or detailed instructions that's the issue and in this particular case we have one doctor who says that there is an impairment and to say that he didn't indicate that is contrary to the fact of what he found as far as global susman of what's the clearest indication that he found an impairment because of the the gas score itself that's the issue that's i mean the fact that he made a j after fifty eight dollars indicates that he believed that there was some level then come in and then indicated what th what if he intended to not find that why would he go then to the next steps of saying all the rest of those categories were not severe he could have easily said that there was no impairment or any