education teacher at the high school for my new shoes an assistant boys track coach reporting to a different coach for eight years she was assistant calls cross country coach reporting to different turned west three years before know many of the parents of the kids would be bather death type of thing but it's more than that he said he threatened i'll have to quit he said i have to protect myself and protect the students from her trying to figure out exactly which statements are in front of them as well jeff ok so there's a story statements on the second page of the email yes clearly it seemed to be pretty clear you were alleging those yes and then you're also talking about something on the first page for being physically aggressive towards what happened the previous year when there was a bruise or there was a problem the previous year and it was resolved in some kind of an agreement or no contact agreement or really that's the answer but there was something isn't this just sort of a paragraph talking about what the the brief was in the november one which i guess was a grievance complaint there's a list of things that number it says physically assaulted me number two says physically assaulted me by grabbing my arm and trying to force me into a room at the end of the construed that particular i mean yes saying that her and i know you know we're up to six fifteen there are these allegations are true and the complaints room founded right but saying that somebody assaulted me for fifteen minutes doesn't is ok for students for a teacher to hang out with students while they are taking drugs and drinking there is no law against it and in fact you wouldn't be able to prevent it but i think it shows crow judgment to look into the circumstances of a especially when you're talking high school students circumstances here we have something in writing sitting right here we don't get the circumstances the queries to look at it the context of this and the context is this is a not for that contained the supposedly defamatory statements by attaching them to the complaint and when he when trudeau's not there was documents and you consider that entirely and in contacts i'm thinking putting all the words the natural meaning including the their parties to refuse to associate with the teacher when you read the whole thing in contacts because he's given a lot of contacts rolling around on a bed you know would tell him that in th think that it's actionable and he says it contacts but the story it is he says he's made it she's making it difficult for me to perform my job at a hundred percent that isn't very scary i think there's a lot of times that we can't perform our jobs at one hundred were protected the privilege was abused because the statements were false and defendant knew they were false and were not investigated prior to the state laws that we accepted as true even though anybody on this site is saying that we are sure it's not perfect it's very well may be perfect but at this stage how do we even know what the proper chain of command was how do i know it wasn't supposed to be the school superintendent they want all these claims out because we're sure this is privileged it seems like we have to have a stronger record that we have here i don't i don't see the i don't see how we can know is a matter of what the proper chain of command was and therefore that they did