athletic association and and the national federation of high schools of ca she's there protocol essentially put in place ability for the coaches teachers etc athletic directors to be educated on what to look participation in their practice or competitions it did not require a diagnosis from anybody and the school itself simply that they recognize that the situation gave rise to a suspicion that this student athlete may have sustained a concussion and to take action from slightly different and six one zero five immunities states that while this the local public entity is immune from a failure to make a physical or mental examination or make an adequate physical or mental examination of responding to a call is to render medical care granted it's first responder medical care it's not the position of a doctor or a nurse however they have an obligation to examine a patient and determine whether urgency medical care is needed is not the same as the students or the coach else or the coaches with regard to the student athlete they've merely of are educated and put in a position where they are charged with the test of recognizing the coaches were charged with the task of recognizing cautions that were were armed with the education needed to make that assessment and to take something that may have been linked to you or me and be exit what the school was aware of the fact that they that she had a phone that was the allegation yeah and i don't think that it's disputed that kellie swanson fell out of practice and according to her own testimony right the coaches were present  it gives a coach with the ability to say hey this is a situation that this student may have sustained a head injury and he's to be checked out because of the seriousness of the head injury so you know that set off the policy shift that examination a that diagnosis to somebody comes qualified to makes that make that and puts the coaches in a position where they we have to recognize the potential or the suspicion that head injury was a stick and here the staff of the high stool itself is great in the sense that it doesn't require any specific set of symptoms for it to apply it simply requires that the coach or athletic trainer or teacher or whoever's in the position of being present  give the student athlete examined by an athletic trainer or get clearance by a medical physician that this statute applies in this case it's certainly instructive in two thousand and fourteen illinois legislature enacted laws requiring concussion education for coaches teachers getting officials until various requirements are met including evaluation by a student athlete by either a medical doctor or an athletic trainer this is strikingly similar to the protocol that was in place at home high school in two thousand ok and taken in a vacuum i would agree with you that that's not her indifference or conscious disregard however here it is not to soon after he was charged with the task of determining whether or not they were injured it's the coaches the teachers th feel that she had a concussion wallow concussions in and of themselves are hard to diagnose or even harder to diagnose as time passes so whether or not that a physician would have arrived at that same conclusion had she been seen the day over the day after i can't say but it also doesn't excuse the second and third sentence as were kelly's felon struck her head on the mat and no medical attention was sought because the school didn't contact their father trainer who wasn't in the building for that matter and didn't tell kelly or her parents to go get checked out by another physician they simply allowed her to return to practice and for the third of it wasn't until kevin remove herself from from the competition and sat on the bench with an ice pack on her head there's not a material question there is that absolutely not ron none of those coaches believe that she had a serious injury the allegations that they should have understood that she had a serious injury not that big you she had a serious injury i'm observing be beaten with confusion that this type of physical or mental condition exists wrong i mean that's just their experience in life that when these things that i mean look at the kid they observe them to determine whether or not there's a problem and they go from there and one hears her they didn't think that she was seriously injured she told them that she wasn't seriously injured that he expected his coaches to be familiar with the this material and to be educated on how to recognize when to recognize situations where student athletes may have been suffered a head injury or concussion he also stated that he expected central to those cases was whether the condition was waived or obvious and here the coaches were provided with the training required to take something that otherwise may have been latent to a lay person and make it obvious that this is a situation that this student athlete may have sustained a concussion they want us to diagnose they weren't asked to examine they were asked to be aware of the circumstances in which this injury occurred and if there is any suspicion at this student athlete sustain a concussion all of the should have been a suspicion that they needed to take the next best athlete examined by the athletic trainer a medical director i'm sorry medical doctor and that's even underscored even more by the fact that the record argue facts that i feel