MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
one decision said that the court regular inquired whether the party has succeeded in persuading that either the first or the second court was misled persuading few more years on their contract through summer of two thousand and two a position some of what they're shooting now five months later the valid briefing from the idaho public utilities commission saying that they only have the power supply t contract he says i will also analyze the seven year contract that has not been offered attach that name with the analysis according to him getting a seventh year on that was worth nine point five to eleven point six bush two thousand and one really means it terminates on january first two thousand and three that makes no sense if they want to try me on january first two thousand and three that's what they would have said it's typically says it runs through december thirty six years of the contract and makes a seven year contract and if you want to intricate it in that technical stance i hope you can follow me as my wife couldn't if you have to give notice of terminations after december thirty first two thousand and one you can't give it until january one two thousand and two ok you have to give it one year's notice he can't get one years north of course number three for two thousand and two which would be the next day it would renew so you can't one in the electrical service schedule number or hundred which set out what the contract provided for we see it from the december thirty first two thousand and one when we file our application with year it would truly understand the thirty first two thousand and one but we would have given forty years less one day by the first one they notice and that's all we have to do is give them at least one year's notice which we did on december eleventh two thousand we gave one year's notice raised the english language by saying that it's from an asian date well thirty one or one not only terminations did this in the agreement but it's in every single document there after the death has no meaning
persons from discrimination and abuse based on religion including instances of violence attacks on christians and church closures and it noted back in two thousand and nine that christian indonesians were determined to be members of  at least the new information that christians are still in disparate groups and they were mentioning that they haven't the petitioners didn't show how they were similarly situated to hold and that the recognize that there is always there usually going to be some sort of relationship between the original case and the new information the only question is for prime the face he's showing whether circumstances have changed materially change affidavit and doctor for max and everything we submitted they did for they did talk about the change with regard to christians but it was also pointed out that and this is something that dr winters that have come about over the years and particularly you know he mentioned with with the whole targeting of a whole and tell that really brought that was i thank you thank you very much  a different question are you aware of any christian and i know there's a lot of different christian sects very you aware of any christians that it doesn't believe in no i think that you know i i think that the issue is the way that the way that one goes about being a witness pastors in the ology and it doesn't seem consistent with my my understanding of how different christian sex i do seems to me like catholics would have a very you know whether they do or not i don't know but if i start like it's a matter of offer and whether they actually are out just government counsel again i think that things in general have gotten worse for christians as point out by the experts and they and the and and  someone who stands on a corner and and and gives and preachers it gets involved in it calls individual acts and this is what happened here and there's no indication that
internet found the separation agreement and in january or february of twenty sixteen he agreed to this separation agreement because he wanted to be arranged to stay together to be together and they started with misty arrangement he lose part time in the house she went to my house and when they were not in the house they each with their parents they started initially with a marriage counseling eventually turned into the worst counseling and worst counseling session we need for the first two thousand and sixteen home he has to move in with mom to the state he still lives with mom he can't afford to go out and maintain even the standard of living that they had during the marriage she has hands take in much less standard of living to maintain his bills trying to sit down to campaign with your children when you're not running sunday nights sunday nights this is wind down time have to end with the kids getting ready for school on monday morning so we asked the parenting skills will now be changed  interestingly enough on that no parenting plan has not been entered by the truckload you see some testimony in the transcript that the printers were to work together to get that pension plan completed submitters of the court and we have been unable to being borrowed so he should be held accountable for that bad at the same time she wants you to find that even though he's willing to now it's mean deposited into his joint account he's supposed to know the security back
with the best way to look at it is if we will be at the crux of this where spouses were stockholders and they would actually be reimbursed by the total marital contributions made on the triad road property and the amount seventy five thousand dollars so at one point in the judgment the court did state that any m two thousand dollars was cancelled out by the sixteen thousand dollars it is it's a little bit difficult to follow in just the judgment of the current clarifies personal contributions thirteen holding but the two that were cited joined and lundahl both involved and discussed that an expert is necessary to determine what would what words mean earnings or are there if any the burden would have been on mary to have that actual and not only did they not employ an expert they also again did not prove through the big records to demonstrate additional deposits into that account from other sources from the parties income which are good that deposit funds into that account from the business when they needed money for certain expenditures and there was money coming out of that  regularly there's no item is asian or accounting for the money that was bought out of the town and that's where even if that that make businesses posits were on their own which we don't believe that they were but even if they were they now been c you will not go thank you
the judge has to look forward but here we've got twenty twenty hindsight with person who participated fully in the trial why would that make any difference that instrument had a trial we've already had all this full participation point we made a mistake in our pleadings and i believe it was just about four years ago today when that complaint was sort of upon mr kendrick the defendant the mistake we made in  of charity to continue his missionary work abroad and specifically in that that was a religious decision that he made he referred to it at trial is an authentic call from god control where he was as to what i did so the world he did his mission did that was decided by the hierarchy rather than by him and so once he said i don't want to do chance raised so that when the court had to look at it when we sent it back and the judge had to look at it he had to look at all these factors and balance the factors not proud to do that but charts balanced the missionary work the same wore it except that it rather than someone else be able to determine he did that were he took that upon himself i'm not suggesting that was inappropriate but he did take it upon himself and does that change the equation you know should not change the question because before he was a missionary working abroad claiming state citizenship and  afterwards he was a missionary working abroad with the same material interests and the same authentic pull from god claiming citizenship and except when he was asked these questions and it seems federal courts except the united states citizens claim to want states citizenship this is not a fight over whether he was from the state of maine or from liability only all he wants is to claim one state or state and certainly in the cases that involve missionaries working abroad or missionary doctors or students working abroad that would be the case they would spend more time in there and it's very mission then in their home state but they still have  the change in in nine hundred eighty five of leaving the brothers the other concern that we have is that if the federal courts put all  religious entanglement issues because the court is now passing judgment upon or treating mr ballen for differently based upon a religious decision that he made not based upon any difference in the actual it balances differently but how can that be clearly erroneous given what the district court did well they can because the fifth district court accepted the concept that if it was a missionary working abroad truth it's it's it's not it's a relative in the sense that it did not change his genuine intent to continue to claim the citizenship which is that reaffirmed when he moves to cedar rapids
exercise a simple judgement no direct public service no kroner hectic environments brief superficial contact with coworkers sense and supervisors no ten of terror the only one in  and then what evidence supports the first two point you're not saying you think additional limit cases should have been included in the hypothetical you're saying that those that were put in there are not only linked with the medical evidence  it's it's not in my position right now to say what it should or shouldn't be because then i'd be playing doctor the of the record show in this particular case the judge's decision done an adequate or the judge in this particular piece did not do an adequate job assessing all of the limitations for seems to be a real bend on to maintaining the whole concept that somehow or on a regular basis per month the same thing can be said the very few cases of first few there are only for example three occupations in the dictionary of occupational titles that are like me sedentary an unskilled concentration persistently pace and just including more specific limitations in the hypothetical and there may not be completely new groups here but as there are there any specifics you can tell us about articulating specifically why because if we start getting into too much of well these are the limitations that should have applied then we are a member again i would feel like i'm playing it's you know with enough authority and conviction and enough support and that's the problem with these cases are there doing them in a quick hamstring fashion without really dealing with right unlike the state agency doctors dr king's thought or concentration problems were marked thought her social problems were mild and thought that she had significant job stress limitations and the ale  limitations to the r f c and i can detail them and have the r c here added limitations in addition to simple routine repetitive tasks no more than simple decision making more than occasional and minor changes in the work setting the exercise only simple judgment unable to work in crowded or hectic environments and then and then took account of the state agency doctor's opinions that she could not work more than briefly or superficially with the public coworkers or supervisors and that she was limited to the court members have to decide right when we look when you look at the four corners of the document what are the four corners of the document and the natural inference is that flow from them tell you about what the able to talk about the underlying decision and then must decide whether substantial evidence support recent materials can cross was numbers to determine the job numbers so that the job description that that is employed used the job description identified as identified and sort of described in the dictionary of occupation stress and there are times that she mentioned that she is going to have difficulty with concentration and persistence she gets distracted easily and again the narrator talks
u are innocent and have not done enough harm to anyone else but the fact that they have some money coming to them going to tell you about my son brad he's a brilliant young man he uses a communication device like stephen hawkins in fact he met stephen hawking but his entreaty his brain is can affects only the muscle tissue tongue is a large muscle so when you meet someone with cerebral palsy and they communicate with you they always have a heavy tongue sound and but they're just at their cognitive level is sky high and in many cases just take a look at take a look at stephen hawking the physicist he looks like he's severely retarded and can't use his muscles but he's out of town the guardianship of brad and isolated him so now he's not permitted to use his communication advise and anyway i just appreciate the facts that are interested congressman and i made trips to washington and i've contacted president obama i've written to him and each one of my congressman my governor has information on the predator guardian in my son's case being a sheriff's deputy and misusing his authority to intimidate everyone that tries to stop his abuse of my son i have been to the state attorney's office i've been to the florida department of law enforcement and i just it's it's been years that i'm i will i thought i was doing this all by myself until i went on you tube and discovered all of the other people in the state of florida in the united states that were suffering the same kind of abuses so you know i appreciate all the people that have to take an interest in my experiences recently within the last security person that got guardianship of my son and i spoke to his secretary and jay that they would do it was a federal office and they wouldn't let me into the into his area i told my story and showed my pitch it to his judicial assistant and she said well this needs to go back to the judicial complications committee it has to go through the channels and
at dealing with the overzealous course discovered and i asked who signed the property and at first i got right and then fact that when you read sections and all together it makes clear that what you're dealing with is you don't get those things are involved you're not going to pose liability somebody has acted outside their authority cited the uniform act of handing uniform act provisions were there they work the legislature chose not to cite it included the reference was there in two thousand and four or not and i want you know an honest answer and i i just advise everyone that when you step up and argue a case here you're speaking as an officer who works here basically under oath i understand your position you placed it into the brief and i am not challenging in our questioning i just i just really want to know whether this man's name was there or was it because if it at what point it was changed i'm not sure i'm clear as to whether or not that was changed but the other fact that is important to remember also is that they have points it was put on notice when they received the property or for that mr yale was a member manager of the referring to  still a question of whether or not you can even use that option against the elysees which has been addressed in several cases as well but first district second district and they've done it in limited circumstances but that doesn't even apply to this case here a member or managers of an l l c can take personal liability for the debts and obligations of the corporation removed some of the elements of the allegations or elements in there you know as far as are to ego and so forth allowing that any can impose liability it's yours to observe regardless of the comments with regards to the uniform limitations for the consumer product they knew they have known since two thousand and seven that they were injured and since two thousand and six they've had a property report that listed and attested to by mr dale as a magic l c of the fact that the information of the the first one goes to the purported affidavit that is part of the property for the property report that was given to my clients at least it's on the representations to meet is found go through that document you won't find allen this is signature at least i have well they say it's at our scene fourteen hundred and fourteen that's my point is fraud occurred in two thousand and six two thousand and seven it was when they were constructing my my people's unit and we had no idea that's allowed you have one it's hard and two are you not going as far as independent liability i mean the simple fact is rid of liability is not the same
dismissed without prejudice i would take the position counts five and six were then dismissed with prejudice at the time mr bond backs motion to dismiss was for him to with prejudice and more were even assuming outstanding issues that remain with the petition for attorney's fees and a file by mr bombing that issue even if you look at the report of proceedings i think it's fairly clear you know that that was the intent of the trial cour entitle someone to return to the fees decides that they're entitled to it courtesies but then doesn't assessed up and we're supposed to determine whether or not he abused his discretion or it's against manifest where the evidence when we don't even know what the statements would be meaningless if the purchaser was left without a remedy when previously undisclosed financial conditions would deal with substantial additional financial burden on the owners of the condominium units  there's a letter from defendant bombeck saying you know we don't want to comply with two point one in this situation because we don't want it for whatever reasons the head there's a letter saying what if are demanding may have been made section fourteen of the counter put a time limit on the buyer provided by a bar they know that it's important to know that the buyer is the offer of this conflict the buyer provides this contract to the seller with the purchase price and says we're offering they have five days to make the demand that's correct to the trial court say i'm striking a complaint for failure to stay because of the action because you didn't allege that you made a demand within five days action as well the if there is no post remedy right there is no remedy period so what you're arguing seems to be somewhat extraneous is there is some place in the record where we can examine specifically what this court for what the trial court said relative to the five day argument of the traffic court did saying they condemn the  they court also that these documents are requested in a timely manner if you request those documents on time and the others and you don't get all the documents are you not happy with the information you get which is also  taking the branch can be called for technical and letters go back and forth by the attorneys you know if they say something so maybe didn't follow up on something but how they specifically waive the right of disclosure i think is too full the  demand don't you think that if you are not going to waive this issue your client you said i'm sorry the five day time period is gone and therefore under this act i don't have to provide you with anything what your client didn't do that your client presented you with some of the documents with a letter that's part of the pleadings that says we're not going to comply with you will help you get with the documents we have we have who doesn't believe that
to the motion that these are so intertwined that it would be difficult to decide this in a substantive way or a definitive way and not have it  how do you know that if we don't hammer record on this current proceedings we are she green to the three or four and we have a record of the other were she denied it but the mere fact that she granted this time are you speculating that she gave  or don't those two counts also if not some of the people who are now are on the case we'd have to somehow get him back in or i have been testifying passively which is not or so far removed from the school of employment then it's obvious that the act or the employee was acting for himself and not for the employer
you know the person receives the petition within twenty four hours upon  would be completely just for legally free from the department of human services there is some testimony that he was getting better that he's going to be transferred chester to another he wasn't the only if he took his medication yeah in he was never directly asked this issue he was asked if i should be committed but never asked whether set the initial hearing upon the filing of the titian within five days the court itself it was set before the day after the filing a petition on the day that it was and that the hearing w the request for jury trial so it fell within the balance of fifteen days so there was definitely strict compliance with any continuance request whether it was a continuance that was necessary fact that court could not schedule one sooner it nonetheless dealt within that fifteen day structure even if you don't see this as a delay occasioned by the response  so there has been to this point strict compliance there was no objection to the date because the court chose to send the jury in on the very morning a jury trial which was actually occurred on order that in a timely fashion he has a right to ask for continuances and he was given continuances to locate these witnesses  that he's sitting there with our without a resolution on the petition not a hearing on this never happened sooner and can't show any prejudice because he wasn't just in we were house during that time he was medication so obviously what doctor i case a test of my cure is that he cannot provide for his basic physical need with this regular application or ingestion of this medication and that if he does take this medication in the structured environment then he will not be able to garden so serious harm because he will harm himself that that testimony supported this ground even though the secure verbatim was did he suffer any prejudice because
korea on the united states and involved over the southern and the northern part of the united states meaning that the two missile defense bases of the united states at fort greely in van and are correctly aligned to eliminate  this globe they are very poorly aligned especially in the in the pentagon whenever we see a missile launch everybody gets a little nervous because as you know with less than a