order the written order from the trial court there is a rule there's a series of rulings in there that basis for the order and then the order you can also see from the record that there was an offer off the record discussion and argument before the court which was but there would have been really no purpose for me to sit there there was nothing did you make an offer of proof since you did not you didn't then and there is no basis given by the trial court either off the record or on the record prejudice again if there's no law for proof there's nothing cited to us that shows how you were prejudiced by not being able to bring out certain evidence of what that evidence was isn't that a problem while the real prejudice is starkly he pleads guilty and the the lawyers and judge winter i think has been very sensitive to this case in the sense that she did not want to force the minor to have to go to trial and participate in pretrial preparation or trial testimony judgment against a certain check it is order so i think by the order written by the trial court it's clear that he did not properly consider his responsibilities under g eight and the interveners rights were not protected in any meaningful way ca no question i was aware and we made that argument that same morning you know fifteen minutes before the trial started so i don't think it's a question you know where i think that the trailer made a mistake major mistake in not knowing to participate and then being able to make a fair distribution there was no pressure staying on by allowing the interview to prejudice i mean to participate this is a very egregious matter where you've got a child who is you know  horribly sexually assaulted and is very very damage whatever money may be available whether it be you know in the city would be more than what was going to given to him in this particular order would be to her benefit for her therapy and counseling i don't have a good answer for that quite honestly i mean we can only go with what the record is that we have if i made an error and i'm making a profit i guess i could've done by said reports saying there was no basis given but i thought that it was pretty clear by the judge's order and by indeed the record there that he made it clear that he just wasn't going to let me participate period the essence of dogs are you leave this house it's usually worth a hundred thousand dollars is is i to participate in the trial she denied that we have no evidence and say had no evidence contrary to that the sexual assault was discovered by a family member going into a computer very innocently looking for something amongst all of the other factors weigh these factors and i think probably weigh them in different ways depending on how the evidence comes but there is no statutory or or court of forty that i'm aware of that would give an intervener a higher place summary judgment correct yes there's a he used boilerplate language saying that i consider everything presented in front of me but that is the actual order does not appear to even cite or include it in our or so i can tell you that the trial court said like i'm going to consider that there are some informal formulas they use that there's no question she would be entitled to you know a substantial amount of the maryland state but again i think it was it wasn't it wasn't fairly distributed the evidence that was presented at trial and perhaps is easy to say it was a snapshot of then but all trials all this illusion proceedings are a snapshot of the circumstances they as they exist then previous tribut