write it and do not today intend to get mired down in the details of this case in the court court's division and i hope the court appreciate that question days how could it be equitable in this case when i just laid out a summary of what the court did and it appears that the lower judge was trying to make an equitable division almost on the line here did the house which is was a big piece of have said and he split that up even have one party having to buy out the other he did the same thing with the i race for instance they didn't balance out he had one party fountain out randy johnson benson i think him you know the automobiles are automobiles with for the most part everything else he did try to balance at least make it equitable except when you get down to that lambert stock remember sub service consultant stock which you pretty much didn't do anything with and you just gave to one party plus another ten thousand randy  leave don't sell i would say one more normally not except if you did buy that business you know years ago and it was at a list of value so it was something that he was a provider right before they were married and then so i would say perhaps you know it's something that can't be bought and sold because that's retainer in this but you know for the people that are pounds it's basically here income over expenses in profit that has not been distributed to the shareholders i receivables in the company sometimes in the upper two hundred thousand s is always an issue here but you know it when he bought it very little goodwill was paid i don't know this is a goodwill case and nothing i mean to me that's kind of reinforces my point is this a good well they should have been considering the context of  review the maintenance here i don't think is that put in the review and you know the law better than i do you can't substitute manus for the property division but i was it was to me suggested in the lower court's order that maybe that's what he did maybe he made up for but i don't think there's a proper balance there thank you roger and i'd like to thank the court for moving this argument to last an argument this morning in st louis and it's a fun day for me we should court making it possible please the court from those receipts that's a cost of doing business in that sounds like a lot of money for a one man operation and last i knew standard to perry's i don't know whether they have a closely how corporation or how this is set up or if it's set up at all but they're paying their own health insurance premiums their car yes their auto mean it's expenses phone bills car payments etc i don't know whether those end up being corporate taxes actions or individual tax deductions or not tax deductions at all or whether they're declaring author income they need rate a business that has no fixed assets that can generate this many receipts in a year sounds like a valuable a valuable business a good gift but goodness that's provided them with a comfortable standard of living  cellphones being paid for through the company vehicles probably through the company his wife was listed as an employee of the company right i mean but the roles are needed years where they took one hundred thousand one hundred  thirty thousand plus in compensation correct was that i guess well one year one takes it one year the next is that so understand he just he does what he thinks is best and i hope that he's right and sign it april but god thinks things are going on that that that i do not understand you know as a business major clear over my head but but would still what it comes down to is there's just one business that's a man in the field paid what he owed so he's upside down on the truck if there's any more debts it's not obvious what they'd be he certainly didn't say under oath i swear there's no more debts but if you think about it if the business is awarded to him and he's hiding a debt who's shooting in the foot how well if that's something unto itself maybe he has contacts and reputation regular service to regular clients i couldn't do it and you couldn't i couldn't do that somebody that has some ability good there somebody who had some ability yeah but he probably be working somewhere else i mean that's how he got his ability and why did your client pay  of i don't want to change something but i do have something else i'd like to point out which is that he didn't exactly work off with his whole business of the judgment says that he said that that she had borrowed thirty thousand dollars from the business seven you just put up and you have to pay back time so it's not like you got everything she did all right i mean she got a lot of other things too and stuff i want to correct so by the time it got to judge there wasn't a whole lot to buck so there was business of which she had her hands in sixty seven thousand plus stuff and ended up thirty seven the judge that said that said that he misinterpreted something and then he reduce it down to ten thousand frankly when you look at the records i can figure out what the thirty thousand dollars loan with reduced down to ten thousand or loan was really all about so i to though yes yourselves or your corps or anyone in this room if you'd rather record has anybody knows the value of that company is even really a rough idea within thirty or forty thousand dollars and you know i