arbitrator and a commission decided this was an employment relationship  provide transportation services including labor services to our life and return it one would receive the allies interstate operating represented he had the intent that he wanted to be an independent contractor his tax returns from a very clear that you miss operating he has the claim in the surgery that he brings against both parties as well as his own trucking records where you're from you putting down your occupation i'm self employed those things in my view make it very clear that isn't fat especially on just sat around after he returned i think from was that i've done i again you have to look at those other issues because we are this is the problem we get into with this trucking situation we have the federal government with the concern about safety i want to roadway and they have set up these driving record those things are critical under the federal regulations i mean they just have to do that so you've got to be checked out to make sure they can put him in a vehicle whether he's being leased or or however that situation may be  the regulations although only provided by by having at federal forty eight allows him to drive that doesn't necessarily mean that for all purposes and i believe even robertson talked about the fact that they have got to comply with federal like regulations the fact if you have to turn your vehicle over the city over does not necessarily make you an employee from purpose those things are there for other valid reasons not dealing with an front of us we have an agreement we're going to take your tractor and your your labor you're going to provide insurance for that so it gets hurt if you would say his employer or your employer relationship fair  step sheet as easily as like that issue was raised but in all three levels of review the arbitrator commission court looked at the case law that was a provided by ally also there's no evidence in the record that he ever carried another vote for anybody while he was working the arbitrator's commissioners the circuit court looked at the facts examinations which is all does off the campus finest and quite frankly if you look at the records you ward would support a troll permanent decision and clearly supports a fifty percent man as a whole twelve years later we're arguing an issue that was first raised arguably in the circuit court of council want to see it commission that's fine based upon a document that was not on his taken and event great exploration exploration of circumstances of mr russell's on again off again relationship with a one moving storage what is relevant to this court course of you is what bottom line is he didn't have to accept those just back you have to do that this whole thing with his lease agreement that lease agreement was filed into the contract needs a contract came to me is striking that there's some big surprise here you know there was a supremely handled that was an issue you know the whole thing blast there just quickly the difference between this case where early is that heats of those cases trucking companies have signed an agreement with their workers about you know a panic contract or like the status we don't have an for this position