MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
would have had an effect with the jury when they went back to deliberate and make a determination as to the credibility of the most testimony so you're saying the coup promoter her job as a club promoter would have affected the jur contact your interaction with the defendant correct which is why it is if you take hers testimony that she was taken in by mr key assy that she was naming innocent victims but if we were able to show that she even able to show that she was in fact scamming other individuals for her own personal gain and also we were not allowed to inquire any further as to where she did what kind of direct she may have know you're speculating that if we knew these other things it might have helped it might in fact the defendant yes  equate that with a higher degree of punishment the record is silent as to i didn't punish mid attached with a class x felony or the range of penalties for class  under the air and how do we know that intent and i think that's kind of the gist of counsel's argument that it's how do we know so what's the state's position the system vision would be that it's based upon the  was not acting honestly come to suggest that he had to use a fictitious name for a business because his wife might find telling kimberly's though that it was ok to use someone else's name because that person didn't really exist i think all those things to put city in which could be seen by the jury isn't isn't this a less serious crime and conspiracy to come in  in furtherance of the enterprise certainly well you know we were considering a class one two three four x and we were trying to really get the ax he didn't say that he didn't add the others so there wasn't any confusion that the jury would have been under all they would have heard additional mitigation outside of the letters that he had from his family members but there's no question that the trial judge was able to see those documents it's true yes the feeling members
evidence due to the foundation for the expert testimony about the many many nonetheless this court had to necessarily happen why the cow and standard to determine whether the defendant was found guilty  terminations particularly about the tape this court has already found that the very thing has recognized that the tape was clear enough to  know that's already been resolved the issue of credibility that's already been before the court and before the jury and it's already been resolved and would be given deference under common standards that's made the argument to the very very well you know cut that somewhere but the jury apparently rejected that because it was just not as far as  they all says so you know for those reasons you know you can't just rephrase in a post conviction just you can't just rephrase an issue that's already been decided on direct appeal in terms of in effect  even if you looked at the issues that the defendant raises on appeal now pertaining to reasonable doubt been contradicted by the record he he he says that browning was not a credible witness because browning's testimony was inconsistent with thomas's but it isn't to look at record browning testifies he's given twenty five dollars to make the there was only twenty five dollars so you know there's knowing there's no credibility problem there he also says that he was not credible because of the number of bodies controlled by t had a motive to make this controlled by in order to stay out of jail so the jury was well we're you know whatever the various motives groaning might have happened they were aware of you know a
should not require showing a prejudice pretrial and trial would be an appropriate time to address that issue to the specifically with that the court had to address that issue at that point but because a showing of project prejudice is not required it could make because you know all this in the middle so my question to you is we would be very easy for this court to say the record doesn't allow us to determine whether he was prejudiced and therefore he should bring this is a as he writes he stated your family got me and i guess i just have to bring everybody down now approximately later defendant returned to the papists the surveillance from for the crew to readdress these issues at that point however washington did say that the court should address these issues puts trial on it on its own and here with it being the motion to suppress certainly there was a
conduct just record her ten days of test rendered a fifty three page opinion and in that opinion he concluded that the claims were not offs those bad opinion was based on predicate fact findings that were well supported by the record in specification said based on what they did where you compare compounds that are the same except for one different for each and those so called seven series which are mentioned in the breeze every single subseries the look at the compound was more potent than the other  i just want to touch on one last thing which will lead to two things one is the teaching away argument the district corps said there was clear discouragement for making a
for some time and the supervisors were this and did not take action so that in that sense it doesn't matter whether it's a corrupt supervisor case because i think the large together the coworkers may have put it there but the supervisors were aware of it and times it was purposely laid out to embarrass her as opposed to the rocker which was sometimes open sometimes closed but there was a plethora of a few there and  day because there's traffic through there and the evidence even from mr waiter was that the train would take the property with them on the route times as well keep it with their grip so i think that that it was on a regular basis but i cannot state for certainty technologies published case speaks directly to the point being displayed in the workplace even if not directed to one individual specifically and again that's consistent with the totality of the circumstances test on the merits but we would ask that that be
activities that are concerned in this case and both phrases are followed by the phrase in illinois which requires the act to me these whatever they are to have been conducted in illinois and  correct and over ten year period i think there were four cases where y had a an egypt with him and so this is it seems to me not the continuing activit were doing this for if they were not registered and one of the citizens was harmed in some way by their activities would they the citizens be able to sue them  believe in and what this court has do you have a response to councils argument regarding america there's precedent in this district for allowing a complaint through a back that is trial court to actually consider and the power of the second district did say that if they raise the earlier they would have an opportunity to consider the issue i firmly believe that they had your stand point that you have to have civil public of forty years doctors forty from this district we have an obligation to find or to follow that authority unless we decide that it was poorly reasoned were not work language of two seventeen that suggests that it that it should apply to allow someone to sit on a defective filing for six months after the session of the patients and three months before the station for nine soliciting charitable contributions from living trusts then it is in the corporation conducting some other kind of contract business arrangement in illinois i i don't know quite  know they were scrupulous about maintaining this distinction in words threw out the statute and that's another construction the do you have any case law specifically that holds that not for profit corporations should not have the opportunity that it's for for profit corporations to not for profit when there is a statute the legislature decided to make a statute that dress it's not for profit and they made it differently than the other one including none of these exceptions discretion here to determine make a determination in this case the statute speed's the record is there the courts are here to interpret that plain language and try to get the intent as best they can they don't have discretion for the consequences  in fact have jurisdiction of the original council talks about two fruit passes i'm not sure where they get two free passes if there was a mistake if there was a defect it was  if and i say even if the legislative intent of using transacting business in one case and conducting affairs the other case indicating in intent for a different standard as to whether or not
stipulation exhibits three four five six nine eleven twelve fifteen these e mails going back and the way to two thousand eight three think a scary of twenty thirteen sat test years in which the same thing happened testified in the right that this is on page three ninety four of the record when mr augustus left quote he was responsible for everything that mr death case had been responsible for that  mission by a principal at the company cannot be ignored just a second as you refer to the twenty thirteen emails again talking about to them as we have in the past and  no standard instruction so the trial court had before it a number of cases and did independent research this is all evident in the record around the parties to argue for thirty or thirty pages of transcripts on the issue that there was no evidence of a sheriff service they provide an alternative reason to a from the judgment on that basis minimum making clear that we as entitle to no more than the publication fee because they could not establish the one point two million for the scenario cancer presented today there's a bit of a difference between that case in this case though in a property tax dispute is the one seeking the tax need to establish compliance strict compliance language of this court in
for i see i'm behalf of the people satisfies an objective assessment of the facts of the case there's no reason to think a prosecution prosecutor would withdraw an offer on the court wouldn't accept because not only prosecutors and judges are from the earlier with the boundaries of acceptable plea bargains and drop some charges reduce the charges for dropped the factor that made it consecutive from there from that factual basis and some of the facts about how severe the injuries were if the state offered twelve years and agreed to it th
excellent ok here we go for a was good i thought is capturing and action as you can see corruption is placed in the media apartment you're me my sincere apologies i may be a little but i'm on call i'll do anything anything please don't hurt my mom please no ok hold on we need to redo the please now your pee came a know i'd like to order some c d s sure i'll hold do you bring their your production's just to spite me good for you what if i told you everything i ever tried to do is ruined but you had won by a ridiculous this is my chance to put channel seven on the map and i was cut off the finish line well it's kind of tough for me to you might anyway i don't know what the secret plan is so  making music on our audio board which coincidentally is a twenty four channel are you word and the subsidy for low budget music producers and so the media department return to a state of peace and harmony gets her patients plan was to no avail yes molly frick did steal the cameras but she said the day for sure the end i we only have ten minutes we don't have twenty minutes jokes and it's just under ten right so that's what you and check next let's take a while probably longer than just going and buying some man with bigger muscles let me he has and which makes him an keeper we had a blast at the gym and i think i gave him some competition and i wore him out i can't wait for another day with this song i have this one britney is way too fake compete with these natural muscles looks like you two really hit it up to four make any conclusions let's hear about britney's well my day when extremely well she was very attractive i mean style kind of use little help but his looks made up for it he was charming and funny and very nice to take me to a nice restaurant and treat me to dinner which is a plus we had so much in common their taste in music movies and cars he also is about my age i feel we really made a connection and i'm positive that i'm going to win this there's definitely no way him in sas they could have possibly gone past is good as ours did and there is for sure no way he is going to stick some jo girl over me honestly say i want to date someone who could kick there but now that we've had those girls talk about their dates let's choose who our study is chosen the athletic stuff or the girly britney by the like that kind of style and i definitely feel like i'm going to win there here's michael michael now we're all dying to know which one of these girls have you chosen well tina it was tough  that never talked about past experiences much but i bet i can guess yours you're probably in the spike t v shows so just by the teacher maybe books i would say are different for you they dealt with subject matter that you'd use later in life your courage property the united states and other countries place bets on us to see you daryn they the courtesy of living that part out during the american government class
anywhere so that is why i raise that was one of the other issues that we think that there was in teaching a way and that and disregard it or it seems to me you're asking for a walk in the sort of complicated chemistry we're not experts six they're talking about iranian's is listed on page eighty nine so i'm not quite understanding how they can say this was a part of the decision and i disagree that the fact finding on page
or because dollars gone roy and battered us that's why and she must've had a very good reason answer no but invite any place unless you're in some kind of trouble we ain't seen one yet well we might and you can bet there's a lot going on around here that we don't sounds like trouble funk you're not a kid you come on we i heard them all right from the prove that we started the job and we're going to we've got to head straight back to texas and check on ken richard and corral in texas you said hello capt i hear on hello how are you going army protection doesn't permit you to wreck everything in sight that was disgraceful behavior unfortunately there is nothing the army command can do about it boys just returned from baghdad they're very well informed that only one thing to do maybe you're forgotten you're in a civilized country people vanish even in this country alibi  never mind i am we interrupt this program to bring you a new life from the word apartment washington d c pearl harbor if i had been bombed by the japanese plane no other news is
and then to mister gerber for for for a statement for five minutes
passages i want you to read exposed i could never serve them again it must be so and that leaves me no alternative but to resign all i see i'm not a preacher have these old mamma gary but you didn't thank god give you the last one you you or or you know last place the burglar better wait here i'll be right back
mocks one another at the g a o d eventually did the district court ruled that he would allow testimony and so far as it pertained to what they said in so far as  ninety one in contrast to holder says none of the three was asked about the reason for their supposedly hand tailored their t made point to the court two and you will not find what he says is there which is they were not asked about the motives for you now defense counsel argued that in some asian he argued that made the obvious he thought the others was sufficient for him to make that or so with none of the defendants with having that kind of it's happened having been asked about the reason for supposedly cooking up their testimony incentive could be inferred from the operating plea agreements the lawyer argued of course there's overwhelming evidence of guilt of this case this whole system is no direct evidence where you have packages being sent from branch is that it was related to the earlier trip this is strong circumstantial evidence a pattern going that money going from this same gulfport mississippi branch to the same to california in silver accounts know but i'm no big time king in terms of meth on the other hand there is what two hundred and fifty thousand kilograms of meth here so the government's theory he was
insist and that's why it is appropriate for the for the state to argue whether the necessity instruction needed to be given at all because if it didn't instruction needs to be given now as this court and people versus haynes and the supreme court and not people somewhere safe somewhere safe would be the first place to get off the road not seven miles down the road but they all said oh i had to get her medical attention or get it from hospital  believe that he was on the side of the road and one of the options was to give the car saying no you've got all these other options isn't that what the instruction talks about is wh
would support your position that once you set up a trust it doesn't mean anything is wrong here a signature on some bank account you have some kind of case anywhere in america to say that no orders that did that contain free will for a late so really this contempt head of just collapses back on the the underlying entry of summary judgment and whether that was proper or that because even if you find them to be proper that request was that objected to it in fact a circuit court that's exactly what the circuit court did so are you going to be happy and if we just decide the question of the century judgment you want to side the question ok those are what you decide if you're a trustee the money's not yours you count was titled in the name of this trust the trust name was created by lay weisberg first the grand tour she was the trustee of this trust and she was also the sole beneficiary in the terms of this trust and by the way the perfectly honest with you appeared on that bank account you know a lot of people you know think trust me different play like fact is it was there the fact is it was on the account statement at harrah's spank what we got from harris bank is an affidavit which was part of the record from one of their bank allowed him to withdraw the money regardless of that back when you're a trustee you can't you have fiduciary obligations to the beneficiary of the trust and to say that you can as a trustee take the money out of a trust account and put it into your his testimony was all over the place he was saying anything that it would that would stick when when you look at the transcript of his deposition at one point he said was my money another point it was a loan at another point he said it was it was rent  i think he said that some of it was this money and some of it was breath he was what he said he was saying so many different things it was not me that's the way the words came up english language no i understand that i joined the bank  something he did not do the the trial court also found after hearing all sorts of editor reviewing the entire record that there was no genuine issue of material lier we again i don't have an answer to that question we we believe that the wrong was perpetrated by the trip by mr weiss for taking the money that's in a trust account and putting it into his own joint account with his bank the bank was our actions against suzanne and william weisberg or actually i i think at one point the bank may have been a party but they were now they were i'm sorry the bank was not a part of  the the fact that there's no action against the base they can't explain why they did or didn't do it but i would suggest to you that it's evidence or indicative of the fact that they wrecked days williams right to access the account otherwise they would have sued to bake in the fact that they're the signature part o said he took out his own money staffers and that is where this case rises and falls right there if you if you step that proposition which we can take you must observe your judgment and what he did was legitimate if you want to say nor was it your b
mention mention presence of the father at all during the tra
secret data pictures of charges they gave his life to the betterment of mankind kill just to be killing dangerous boys nothing bothers some people not even flying saucers boys from the city not get caught in the whirlwind of progress feed soda pop to the once a menace to travelers missile bases that i'm of there hunting ground but the killers not on the plateau shoot first ask questions later shoot first ask questions later a man runs somebody sho man and destroy
well this is really exciting to be here and barbara's been such a supporter of of all of us that do this strange art for the first of all i want to thank her and the library i'm going to chat a little bit some background of myself and all of us and f here in the midwest at this point in in one's life i find myself thinking a lot about make teachers when i play and i had some wonderful wonderful teachers all wonderful gentleman some of them were he tunnels gypsy some w and i've studied with a number of people my brother tony and i spend several months studying with a nino riccardo one of the real legends of flamenco and he always as was the custom greet us at the door and his bathrobe and teach that way and then to make things worse he had a window open and it was over a very busy street in madrid and saw you could hear of the diesel buses going by and we couldn't hear or listen but then the make things worse we didn't realise what he was teaching us he was very good friends he's passed away and we bonded because both our fathers were not doing well at that time and he actually invented one of the flamenco techniques that are used today so in the two solos that i'm going to play the first one is called room dania is a language when you learn the language of flamenco you can get on to that you can improvise you can get to the point where it's always so fresh because it's happening on the moment every combination of dancers would sing it and guitars will be totally different depending on how the styles of everybody works and so that's why it's always so fresh and it's all diverse because there's so many within the form so many different styles so once you learn the language of flamenco it is an incredible art form and that's that's i think what projects is when you get to that point that you learn the language of flamenco not just learn like a form here and there when you play that you know that's that's very limiting but once you get to the point where you can actually just flow in the form you know it's just a wonderful experience so it looks a little bit bizarre on paper sometimes but it is written down but traditionally it's part something that's passed down from son you know from your grandchildren you pass it on to your children you know it's something in the family that gets passed down
no more so go on the road do you remember when he was still crazy about that you know that he couldn't be straight how you're going to marry another man the day that's what it means i don't know what you're talking about oh is that the bathroom ye down in the lobby you fool you block now get this you do i'm giving you a break yes five minutes to back going to hand me any more argument yes we're staying right here please get out or right i'm going just one more question man's room yet how long did you study i don't know w him every single thing yeah let's hear your side of the story my wife it may she spent the night in the room with a man who kept her and i reserve the right or admissions constitute all the app
are you going to say anything or do we have to guess what you think i would say plenty when i get started joe joe i don't give it a thought
i'm i would i'd like to ask a