afghanistan who moved to germany in one nine hundred seventy nine she received asylum there and she later became a naturalized german citizen she and her family then suffered a series of various  and witnessed the repetition of similar types of events among the immigrant community in germany both in their specific region and received reports  judge relied on portions of that documentation that appeared to overlook certain other documentation that supported the petitioners contention that such activity was happening throughout the entire gender because we as a race ethnicity and membership in a public particular social group the group of foreign appearing individuals who live in germany as a native of afghanistan her skin tone her hair her appearance is different than that of the sort of place all foreigners are in germany it does not apply to all foreigners however it does apply to all foreign groups from certain countries people who appear to be foreign there were reports of incidents that occurred against chirps against afghans against people from africa others who had typically darker skin right under our laws to have that case considered the immigration judge did consider the facts of this case and by reaching this second lovel she by implication said yes these events did rise to the level of persecution should this court disagree with request that it be remanded so that the judge could make a specific finding on this the board of petitioner and the testimony and the evidence showed that her family had suffered incidents in the past they suffered too as a dancer husband was attacked twice in one nine hundred ninety well these  united states at other times and returned to germany it was only when there was a cumulative fact there were several incidents that occurred to her family there were several reports there were several things that occurred all with then approximately six to nine months period of time that she and her family felt unsafe they felt that they had no place to turn in germany they had bro establish that that that there was countrywide persecution and even if it was a requirement we believe that the evidence submitted clearly showed that these events occurred throughout germany our country why there is there's no indication that that the incidents are located or to a regional place of course means machinery leave fifteen miles from the border of beat germany so  to determine the eligibility are you saying anything more than that i'm just saying that if the court finds that the illness in the records compels a different conclusion then it would have to remand because there's nothing else  kind of a case and even though the german government at the higher level at least wishes to control all of this and local police which really were adverse to foreigners and they've obviously been trying to retrain them but it's still new partially successful and then skinheads and the neo nazis seem to be rising  according to the state department reports and amnesty international there are police groups that seem unwilling to follow the law there are police reports that indicate a dislike of foreigners  community where our she would have and this community the petition are clearly believes that they are unwilling to assist her i think that she of course had not spoken with every single police officer in her local district i would not be surprised if there were some who were simply unable i would also like to point out that the petitioner credibly testified that she believed that the number of