MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
couple months maybe i can go i'm not going to wait no grandparents can keep watch out for me when you can't go out or going to long of be a good brother and see things my way just once you seem to suggest that mother team are going to like him with five children to look after i guess i can take care of one did you ever think what would happen to you if you were caught doing this i saw the whole thing as a political rally funny mostly at the house and i mean i could handle her and there's nothing i can do or say that will change your mind you can do one thing for me if you can get some of the things ticked i'll be back in half an hour equipment what would she know about it i can buy another wagon or anything else that's required just tell me what i need he'll tell you if the government wants to be responsible for you oh no nothing like that we'll have trouble enough without nursing lily white women  it cost oh it talk about that later my mother was an indian my father i never saw i don't like white men but i know they won't turn back for just that there will be killing ah i thought i told you you couldn't come on the trip you must have pretty good reason for making this trip having no menfolks i have my husband i've got to join him i was you know he's in california where he will be he had business interests in san francisco a wake up in a week or so with the three day off one of these you'll get plenty of sleep man here my wagons are trying back in the morning nobody is turning back i give you fifteen minutes to hook up all right i yes all right was the right as it's my dog and i gotta move out of here right now in all this money that's easy and fighting indians all the way or
were and yet this this left her woman testified that she did know there was a discussion going on about dividing line you recall that the record yesterday i believe she deed with the wrong address if you take the plainest position i'm not saying i am but the date with the full description of the life for it is printed out typed in by the same title company the woman who
just ten more minutes you know this reminds me of the time i was about to get married was about it quite you know i had the sweetest girl this side of the rocky mountains and you know what happened just the day before we used to get married she quit her job loss to being accountable sure i never did get over it maybe that's him now well i finally struck it mother look look at that everything's going to be different around the ship bank in the first place you're going east and have the doctor fix us and now i i have to be on my way but thanks for bringing davis  i don't like they got company stop but how i don't know we'll find some way come on later who are you what difference does that make their say thank you yeah i don't know if your game is danger you what's the idea first you turn me away with the sheriff and you rescue me and i just don't make sense oh yeah said that they were both interested in the same t from you will in due time the time is now davis all right fellows we've always gotten along with cause i've always played on a square with you as soon as i take a little grab i'll show you where it is davis news gang we're in a tra you hide in there i'm going to try and get him to follow me gun you may need it but you're going with me just as far as you can
well that's what i'm trying to tell you if you read this book you'll find out that gambling does not pay all that's for me re what are your blood and i know what i'm doing and i'm glad to know there's one member of the police or so does ok but isn't it in either charge you ten percent for keeping it waiting they would like to spend it for you with you that's my end of the deal of george washington than nothing nothing at all well that will make you feel any better she said she'd call back all swelled up now when the call comes in let me know right away with you that's it mr whitney doesn't get here first you know what this is all about oh she wants me to bring the money over what money the money that mr whitney gave me thinks i glad so much was it sixty grand grand what have you told me about this before i didn't have a chance i just found out what it was myself a little while ago what would you do with it i h today when the tenant tom reilly pride of the locally techie squad donated sixty thousand dollars to the worried poverty stricken underworld in return for the compliment the grateful underworld entertain him with rock tricks it was a great sport for all what do you want well gunman got him well how come they let you go for sentimental reasons johnny and i were all pals oh that must be mrs dole if you want to get your quick i'm not so sure get over
actions that entered under this section does not reduce the rights of the parties which are to be a testing she was ever actually the night time with child and also jeremy's girlfriend crystal graham testify regarding what their schedule was like in the morning when they were getting you know what their schedule is
as only designed to address sexist it cannot apply to pay disparity between nations or groups that can't be sex discrimination because we genuine issue of whether there is a token hiring to avoid the equal pay act application so if for some reason you had a case that's exactly what the trucker did on this summer just the record judge another determined that there was in fact substantial participation by both sexes in each employment category and that
our government is ready to cooperate with you in every way major right the smuggling of selling the stuff we already on the mexican side of the border to make the arrests i suggest we did lay a while until we complete the evidence on  daniel's one of our best undercover name is operating now in filling in disguise good had general just makes up what you owe me but you still owe be seven and a half cents per state tax well let's take one object if you'll loan me a drink you want to drain go fix oh oh oh no i haven't gotten a message from him so i guess you'll have to write him a letter so the man i sure hope your pigeon gets w that comes if they didn't think it do hey wait a minute i'm going to get that car program that right where you are well what's the matter with your food to keep your eye on that window ok not so fast
you see what i see oh no good come o we can be sure they were the same we were not the kind of the people at the hospital said the man with lead poisoning couldn't get up for a week and yet the peter was able to escape he wasn't suffering from lead poisoning they couldn't have been right in both cases no good no they couldn't keep your appointment with  he's enjoying himself
allegations that he had had contact with a prosecution witness given those circumstances are you saying that it's a piece of discretion or him some in some other manner improper for the use that for the state's attorney who's prosecuting the case against him to have possession of his communications from the jail to whoever individual who may be a prosecution witness and of course the assumption in by you i'm taking as true those allegations i'm not saying on the record that they're accurate but i'm you think the fact that this newspaper was described as having a reputation for dealing in gossip permanent scandal you think that's of course the malice argument the fact that he gave it to that malicious and less assume that there is a four year request and the request is on or does if there is credible proof that could get to a jury on a question of lucius came down and malice on be have with the person who released the information for boy doesn't if if there is such a credible evidence doesn't that defeat your argument of the appropriateness of the summary judgment because there's a genuine issue of material  bear let me interrupt you one second i'm reading from our world twenty three order and it says as the section two us six one five motion is not relevant to our disposition we will only one nine you must separate them out and put individual facts that support your allegation and it's something that you see if you follow along the fifth district you're in sea ice writing about that because it's kind of become an issue any terms of
commit fraud and fraud in addition these documents have been provided and the court shows that there was a meeting with the media partners and want to urge to put the arbitration vision here because of their concerns for this litigation complaint and the guilty pleas there already records show that far from having concerns people pled guilty about these transactions and so it needed to illegality not necessarily as to mr ripley's transaction but as to similar allegedly similar transactions language in our language in the evening agreements has helped period stop there is no discussion about it helped to commit a fraud there is no discussion that it's helped because we can block
your client was just claiming insomnia or depression which are essential on its claim that he has later and there was no previous grant service connection for this disability seems nineteen ninety four
the court must focus on is the eating of the term information as it appears that both the sash and the related and that her information is different and is clearly used by congress as criteria for those and when we say worsening it has to be in relationship to this specific criteria and that information that is to be shared this information
for argument not to see fifteen minutes to sign mr shapiro for the opponent
this i would point out that the minute you graduated from the university of pittsburgh so my son we for the young man recommendations are arranged and engineers i think you would want to make that appointment and direct the manager to go on schools of proposals so that in fact there is a solution or a record for the township or right now w the bulk of these fees that are charged by gateway engineers now at least half of these fees are fees that are associated with development work that is being paid by developers the remainder of the work and gateway engineers is the been the township engineers for a number of years and as a result of that there's institutional history there and that's not to say that you know someone else can come on and do a good job for the town what i'm suggesting is there we have we tragically design as our engineer until such time as we did that service and at that same time we will rebuild the traffic engineering services for the township we really pointy p t as our township traffic planning and design engineers for the short term until we did or till we did the traffic improvement  you will and i will be surprised when the day comes that the state legislature will change that because there's the newspapers have a vested interest in that or are stuck with it i mean if you change story here we will we  day and a long time congratulations i think the township should take pride in and that and i think it's something that we have all the cheek together you also have leaders on the agenda if you could said the e mail the other thing that i would notice if you look at the calendar that's been provided last month he indicated there might be a need for a gender workshop on the sixteenth need for that again that's the reason why i think as it is part of next year's budget cycle we should look seriously at the possibility of a corporate a net into the taxes there's a lot of reasons to do it the downside is that it results in a substantial tax increase i think we have an executive session that's very very warm very very very very
speedy trial rights there is no reason why a defense attorney would keep that carol in this quiver there is no evidence here the defendant changed his mind about wanting to stand trial after his release released there's nothing in the record if you had the time for on april twenty ninth to june twenty fourth that's an additional fifty six days so why a prosperous calculation june twenty fourth to visit for a trial was one hundred forty second day well in fact you know you'd be asked is for people to answer those questions in good faith and make decisions based on back on but i think at the very least you need more information here and that's purpose of advancing into the third stage about our numbers i missed it granted now it's not my forte i must've tried to calculate it and a number of times and every time i came up with a different number because i could never figure out if both parties were green if one person had made the motion for the continuance it really was not a clear record and just to say well the statement miscalculated they came up with a wrong number let them make the demand and let the prosecutor go back to his office and sit there and look through what the days are and then come back into court if we make a mistake we make a mistake the boeing is here they didn't make the demand well but this wasn't the state's position decision that you know maybe this is dictated something like it was an opinion to me in this case but i do want to make it for the record the reason why we believe they think and dismiss at the first stage when we are not present precious question so i think this case is almost on all fours with willis in that cheer you had in willis you care somebody who made the wrong demand never made the right
detail issues revolving around people who participate in pro democracy or anti communist party and if it is outside of china and subsequently return to china are believe it's specifically  the regulations testimonial to god can be considered sufficient to be a burden of proof and occurred in the last ten years
when it was
but that ain't the point you forgot or i mean that some looks like something's gone wrong with your crap are you a bank by life gets pretty tiresome without you fellows after me come out of trying to keep it rightly for and even if you are now you know i don't believe you let dustin did what he said with losing thanks donovan i don't know what i can do tend to your own business thanks sunny i'll remember this i gotta get on your horses and ride i'll be expecting it on me up and arrest miss some day i can't leave you alone and these will sonny all that tell you when i'm gone get on your hearts and get those cattle together
contract to do a very sophisticated and they were big and this is or it's pain shows very clearly they were very proactive in gathering information problem was that they didn't do it the correct way
subsequent attempt to bring the same claims by the same party that failed in race to cut a ground at that point and we can we readily admit that perhaps with only at that point there was collaboration between the current parties in case of chickens running out their heads cut off trying to you know find some somebody standing is who has standing on this case and forced conservation council heard about it through the environmental grapevine and they had appealed the t well that's an interesting point and you were probably concerned that as i indicated they were down to one staff person she was trying to hold the organization together and write new grants to get some money so they were no position to hire a lawyer or even participate in meetings with any groups or anything like was always before the court when it decides anything now under the cover under the category of actual subject matter of fiction issues i think there was only twelve fifty two and only in so far as we are not talking about i don't believe that's before the court vision because i don't think that's analytically so intertwined with with the qualified immunity issue that it would survive discords very very restrictive precedence
know really frame the most important thing is they were the more he said that the important information will tell you what that important
trustee is within the statute or within the process whether or not the corporate representative provision is finding and essentially also the validity of the appointment her very af and the trust as well and i think i'm going to jump ahead it's sort of may certainly make that paragraph void under the case we signed it and perhaps made the entire trust void and we age which refers to the restatement and we believe the statement is part of our law deals with the circumstance of removal the court in making it ruling we are and you did not to be a banker similar institution that's a nicety i think so yes that's our argument and why how do you know which parts of the trust that string to follow which to ignore well typically you would follow all of the trust provision but in this instance our argument here the court would have been just by there was no evidence by the trustee there's no evidence or testimony they did not even show that they were qualified except trucks which is one of the are there any further questions court cannot create an ambiguity one does not exist and as such the successor trustee appointment here was that use of suppression languages mr tucker is cited and we've mentioned all the when the court looks to the trust i believe mr wade was clear he had and suffered really is the trustee and then bank of america was his successor and then they're after anyone court of the bennett decision says the court if you know that the income beneficiaries are in fact those whose the principle has been accumulated to disperse at a later day that's the case here the jail way foundation  the only income beneficiary pursuant to the trust document we believe the only entity that could come forth and has for appointment and in this case they brought forth we're going to bank as far as i said didn't even bring up anybody other than herself so we think the vena court as does the gauss decided supports the position that the foundation is in fact the end of beneficiary that there was  no ambiguity to proceed with a deviation argument and some of the cases cited talk about the equitable deviation only taking place when  the provisions of the trust are impossible illegal or against public policy and in this case we don't think any of those apply current situation the issue actually is remaining language in the process the trustee showed distribute the balance of the estate whatever is left after that to the foundation and the vena court is cited in our brief kind of same type of situation there the remainder beneficiaries of that case which is the jail weight foundation we're a major beneficiary were found to be income beneficiaries because they had ever to believe receive the accrued income
i'm a district judge i enter an order right along opinion in which i explain why i'm granting summary judgment to one party and then  granted in the heart but i get the wrong part and i take care of the parts that i didn't buy it are a fifty four b certification so there is an appealable and it's inconsistent my order that i enter is inconsistent with my opinion where the opinion makes it quite clear that what i intended to do but the author gets it backwards and time goes by because people are paying attention to the opinion they really weren't paying attention the author and after enough time goes by more than ten days that in which the mystique of the mandate starts to enter in which it's something after a notice of appeal is filed a district court for example into certain circumstances can indicate to the court of appeals that it would be in a prepared to everyone the judge and both parties that there was just a flat out typographical error in which the words the words that should have been there were converted remind me because it's now quite flung out of my mind the timing of the notice of appeal filing in this case studies of either of the various papers should be the degree of scrutiny that an appellate court should give to a district court's determination or at least representation that a particular change judge should not the pending on later circumstances decide to change his or her mind about the way the case should have come out there is a finality to the entry of judgment there is an opportunity for reconsideration but once the door closes on that the notion is case closed except for this rather small crack in the door called typographical errors and the like clerical mistakes and the problem is and i think this is this is essentially  mr hill's argument is that if you widen that crack by a significant amount particularly if you wind it and basically throw the door largely open and least by saying that you credit the district court's version want us to draw the line and we can't simply say counsel always it was not necessary decide all that in this case but we have to write it if we write an opinion we have the right opinion or says this is the rule as we construe it here are the parameters this but suppose the transcription mistake was that the word granted was put in instead of the word denied and it's bartleby that put it in a minute i suppose we can show without any doubt that it was
and then  since
his mission you write me that the agency couldn't prove that martin was only pornography because of the quickness of the opening and closing op when you  have to think about this i have to back off now but go read get a regular show unequivocally that barack thomas said what he said and he said he never i never saw him look at it in