once he did that he was had to be found disabled liner periods of burden of proof would shift to the agency to show medical improvement and medical improved sufficient for him week yes or where in the record is the evidence supporting that proposition because frankly we have looked for it i couldn't find it can you point me to something the record that supports th hour day so his statements that that's what you're lying on yes ok no medical evidence supporting the notion that he can't work a full day or work with exactly and his statements is likely that there is the agency being forced to adopt the rules his subjective complaints that he needed to rest during the day do not need objective i am not aware and i don't i'm not sure and i and that's exactly my point the ancient sea has to show that he can work once he has set it in two states psychologists say that he can work full time with minimal interruptions i'm sorry and so i didn't both of the state psychologists say that he could work full time with minimal interruptions only i mean isn't that the contrary evidence actually off fifteen twenty seven where it talks about the weight of opinion it says you have to consider the support and you have to consider the consistency with the record and if they there is no support then those particular and let's remember if they're not supported i have no  judge church's question always go back to just the initial question what's the evidence that he wasn't able to war besides his testimony  and then you can circle back to why the state's evidence was not capable of belief or was not credible or not support records the rehabilitation records he reverted my voice actually care if he reverted to requiring supervision in his daily activities he could cook but he couldn't cut corners and he could pay bills but he couldn't pay bills on a cent more than ten months after his strength it's documented in the service records he could not repeat a ten weren't sentence accurate like please look in the fridge and hand me the caption i couldn't do it he could read paragraphs or simple sports article that port with a ruler but he could not read charts gra or is it related to the part where he has to nap during the day or is this another reason why he can't work this is additional well it is there any other evidence any indirect evidence i think you referred to about sort of his  putting to one side mental limitations but sort of his physical capacity to work without interruption because he needs to nap needing to nap  common and expect that his subjective complaints could be reasonably expected to derive from those particular particular impairments related to his stroke so the judge has already said yes this is perfectly reasonable this could be happening at that point the case law and this circuit is that he does not require additional objector haven't it's there has to be something because it's the chance obligation she knew she had every reason to believe that evident that opinion had been given those directions had been given only twelve months and he's got that and it doesn't matter because in this case actually all of the cases under the record first of all the regulations that receive i can give you and then there's evidence from the other physicians and health care providers that's contradictory so at that point what your position is too i mean i thought or you were going was that you were going to say that that that evidence is a matter of law could not overcome your car testimony that's true full doctors and therapists treating mr perry reported that he was recovering extremely well his neurologist consistently reported that he was doing remarkably well and that he had recovered extending well just three weeks after his stroke mr perry's physical therapist as required under the social security act and that he could perform work in the national economy jump to the ill gee did find that there were moderate difficulties with concentration persistence and pace can you tell me how the for familiar with the term so is there somewhere in the regulations i can look to find out what that means and hopefully well i think i think she just meant that he isn't limited to he has to be limited to a job where he doesn't have to work on a on a constant measurement so even if it even if you only have to do one or two tasks within an hour it's not the number of task for hour that is that's determinative of your success on the job ok i get it from my perspective i'm just sort of i'm troubled by this because i did not know that's what it meant and nothing in the opinion explained to me that that's what it meant or why this would address his limitations and i can't find a definition of this in any kind of official document so what am i supposed to do given that state of affairs  i think i think it just has to be the general meaning of non production oriented i don't think that has a general meaning i actually literally thought it meant you're not producing things you're not working on an assembly line but you think it has sort of a c i could look it up in the dictionary and i would get that that means not fast beast so i think i think it is it is and it's not that you're not producing things on a on a constant basis whether that be on an assembly line or not but it could be that like you have to if you have to sort mail and you have to get there were certain number of letters by the end of your shift would that be production oriented work or non production oriented work you're not making anything honestly i don't  as i read the union i understood the non production oriented work setting to be that you don't have to you don't have to produce a certain number of things within a certain period of time you might have to stored a certain number of letters within a certain amount of time limitations of this climate and so that's that's the other issue in this case is how the specifically consider the mental limitations of the climate in this case which is another point that mass you know highlighted  fically noted that she was limiting him to unskilled work which the regulations define as as simple as simple as opposed to difficult tasks and this again is directly in line with what the st limited are you saying that the fact that he didn't order the magic words directly to his specific mental limitations and say what the diagnoses work but accounted for the description of what he could or could not do that that's enough and specifically referenced speech therapists notes regarding his ability to follow instructions and as a result of that limited him to unskilled work which is which is some work so in that but so then we're back i think to this non production work setting doing a lot of important work because of the concern is not about you know the number of instructions that can be involved in how skilled the labor is but the persistence and the peace me that that seems like a really important distinction from sizemore because in sizemore if i'm remembering right they said it has to be the r f c was limited to non skilled on the same non production work setting and low stress like that was added in there so that when the occasional expert got the hypothetical the expert could consider whether a job like samael sorting although it was unskilled and perhaps not production oriented you know might still come at such a fast piece that it would be stressful but here nothing put the vocational expert on notice that this had to be a low stress not incredibly  limitations and concentration persistence and pace that he was able to work a whole forty hour work day and he was able to maintain concentration crew two hours at a time and that he could perform work with all my and frequent b instructions those are obviously not covered by unskilled work and non production saturdays you would you think that means non production oriented works that i have absolutely no idea when they contradict evidence that is in the record but the record itself the objective record the statements are they are the state agency opinions cannot on their own overcome the evidence that logic because i've never laid eyes on him and also because four hours of light house work week  not mr perry who certainly couldn't afford it for getting the required neuropsychological testing and me and an opinion he couldn't afford an opinion doesn't have any money he has no one of the most important things here is that he couldn't do anything on his a c he was not independent in driving he was not independent in cooking and  consistent basis being able to carry on an occasional conversation to show he could do any of those in addition neuropsychological testing such as the house then right and in fact it gives that example in the regulation she didn't have it she had to go get it she didn't do it and that can be cured