during a presentation then after the presentation and the questions you typically turn it over and ask for public comment first in support of the application that opposition to the application of course that doesn't mean comments have to follow those two categories can just be law that are ok with that we'll turn to the first matter which is case number fifteen forty three it's a request by janet kelly for a special permit under sections three point three designing by law to is number is number fifteen yes forty four permit is under section three point two for a similar use similar to retail sales and services to special permits under section one point five altering non conforming structure one of the sites at back twenty minimum allowed one point eight feet existing at proposed the seconds for building heights twenty eight feet maximum allowed thirty two point five just in proposed and the fourth being a special permit under section one five to offer an option for me parking twenty one spaces required twelve spaces existing eighteen i do not think this case should be heard this evening i didn't have time to analyze this case and i did not have time to analyze the probably associate memorandum concerning the parking in the crypt generation that there's a lot there probably enough people either be interested in the area  i'm proposing is the outlook and makes presentation the stephanie board member was to say i think you should submit this following thing to so that we can consider the next time we could make such those requests we would not go further we would not not hear from the public because you know we would not like to have it so we get two weekends to look at  ok and so what we're going to do you want one obviously more information next time and we will hear you know the board members will have questions i'm sure based upon what we've heard today and what we thought we'll be seeing in the near future and then we'll be looking for public  cases but you know i feel like we say we saw one for two or three percent the other they're going to keep going that is a good thing not that i want to make a big point about all this storm water i have issues with those well i think all these little things do add next day and file a motion for reconsideration of decisions that have not been filed ah so he added so i don't see it as being an hour not only has he filed a motion reconsideration he's arguing an appeal and as far as i'm concerned we're setting a precedent by opening up motions for reconsideration based on no information at all or with more hours application based on no pressing evidence that i see that gives him  regarding the board meeting process and there's a couple of aspects to this and i want to start off by discussing the process itself and i was going to just reach drop by discussing the goals i and members of the public and i want to give everybody a chance to comment on to allow them to be heard both respected members of the public and of the specter the advocate it's my view that if people believe they've had an opportunity to be heard they're more likely to accept a decision when rendered if it goes against the and i hope that everybody gets feels they are a chance to pursue the points that you're working to make the points they think are important to ask applicants to all the points they think are important and so they feel like everybody's had a chance to express their views and try to convince record because people do go on and on and on but i don't think for the most part we haven't needed that for a long time but now you're getting more and more controversial things are coming to town and that helps i think what we have that become part of the submission because oftentimes or not we get a portion of it if there's a lot of construction project going on and we were grouped in the new portion of it we often don't see the rest of the plant that bothers me