obviously sent out the survey and thank you thank you for those of you that already sent that back if you have not do so but if there are if there are thoughts of people would like to share publicly maybe just have a bit of discussion about the the things that you know worked well this year are things that we can improve and i'm entirely happy to focus by the way on the things that we can improve i think let's do that and then we'll talk about summer work we'll talk about the minutes and i think that's the core of our agenda ok so it's not on the floor up for any any comments you want to make about how we can actually serve time eating think that was for the better i don't think anything was sacrificed by having a more economical meeting schedule so i hope that will continue i have thinking about  i guess and again the issue of time i was thinking about the war committee report which you know when i first joined the war committee was a very minor activity and maybe have not much you either and it's since become something that i think is quite useful but also is an enormous undertaking and i think the most important thing we add or put in the report is first up the summary on the front the executive overview and then the narratives for the various departments to try to key in to what's most important or interesting  and that's all good but there's a lot the lot of the data presentation itself is quite time consuming to collect and then to produce in the report and it seems to me it's a bit inefficient right now because for the most part or maybe entirely the data is drawn from the budget book and we're really just repackaging information that's already in the budget book so and in some cases the tables in the budget book are pretty close to what we have in the work committee report i think the budget book might even have adopted some of the tables in the one media report but i think we should take it one step further and if the tables that we're including the report are truly useful then they should probably go in the budget book in the first place and then the warn big because right now the same information is basically being compiled twice just in slightly different formats so it may be working with the people with the budget book together if we could agree on a common set of tables and just have that on the budget book directly then we can either easily cut and paste into the work committee report or maybe that's the way to go that they'd be compiled in the normal course  for the budget book we could cut and paste into the work committee report as necessary and then we could just focus on the narrative and i think that would streamline the production of the war committee report a lot well let others come in and out  a mission your opinion i know that one things that david and his team does actually look over all of our numbers and you know make sure that they're there can they're matching with what's in the budget book and so that's actually extra work for the top administrators team so i think the point you're making potentially is actually helpful not only for us but also actually to talk to mr there's office so you don't know if you have any particular thoughts about that or any general suggestions that we don't have to resolve this today just to be clear but it's got it's useful to start surfacing issues  over the last couple years we've streamline some of the information in some cases that is man we've incorporated the way you display the information into what we present so frankly to get where you're saying  pictures allow it to be so much more seamless i noticed that in some of the departmental reports there's a column that does a percentage break out of budget on a percentage project but on a percentage basis of the whole in terms of the program breakouts what we do is we basically take the data that's generated from the budget report and  then summarize that into excel spreadsheets and then basically map it to the word document that the budget has so every year we do try to go back and take a look at see what they can see that we can incorporate that would allow it to be more of a seamless document so we'll do that again if we can incorporate some of those things up front so they can be more of a cut paste that's fine i guess the other option would be to assuming there are not a lot of changes in the budget basically and i think we may have done this this changes to get at what you're getting anyway so there's a few more things we can move towards doing going forward but it's an interesting thought and i don't think anybody really benefits from making either on our side or incorporate the comments from the meeting with the department heads which is not in the budget book especially the sections like you know the wish list what would you like to have getting answers to i see this number is change why and that often finds its way in there what's over five percent and five thousand dollars and y which is not it's in the numbers in the actual budget tables but you have to actually go in there and pull it out it's not in the narrative at the beginning in that format so there are things that we get from having the department had meetings that being  said i don't want to do the work and if they had do that have david give us numbers now we regurgitate the numbers and david jackson numbers then we fix the numbers it's kind of silly to do that i mean this year it happened a little bit because we were trying to find out whether we did the town meeting voted numbers the adjusted numbers or the actual budget numbers if we can get all that straight now to advance i'll save a lot of time it wasn't that anyone was wrong as we were using the different column in the budget table so i mean yeah i mean i think you're a volunteer committee and you know this stress on your time is is appreciated and i think we could do a better job just coordinating how the information is being presented so that you can more easily incorporated in your report that something we can certainly work on whether general thomas people seem to like the report you read it from what i heard that was a good thing i thought the public presentations were wonderful i really did i thought here patient inter meeting was excellent and your presentations to the corporate briefing audiences they answered a lot of questions that typically come up and you really before they were asked which was helpful i think for everyone so that it was it was very good with regard to the subcommittee work i don't know whether this is even necessary raised but i think it's a good idea to really be sure that i'm not to undercut david's work with his staff but that the work committee should always be aware of trying to elicit from department heads where they think they see potential efficiencies or changes in their departments that might either make their work need fewer resources or plain need more resources to make the service better i think the work committee is helpful to the process generally when we get that kind of measurement filter through with the rest of what we present to tell meeting so i just think if  there were a way of incorporating into our the document that we use to collect information something that consciously elicits that that would be a good thing when as i say as a relates to public presentations  i've had some a couple conversations now with mike widmer and with alan cushman about recreating or reinvigorating the notion of town meeting member training so one things that i'm going to do is put together some materials to do that in september or october some sometime in the fall before we actually meet again as to how many members and go through the budget goes your you know answer basic questions like what is chapter seventy eight for example and and and do all that and give give people an opportunity to ask detailed questions and you know we can have the folks come to the tent they want and be able to chime in and what i do is make that available not only for a new town many members but for any time any member of the feels like they could use a refresher and i've gotten a bunch of feedback from different county members that they would find that helpful so we'll do that in the fall and then i think the intention and this is by the way something that was allison i know i've done in the past so i was sort of remiss in not having done it over the last couple years and so i will do that again in the fall and i think we'll try to reinstitute doing that essentially in april so that when i knew how many members are elected will do a training that will happen in between april and the main town meeting and out of the kind of a hopefully a consistent practice that people can build off of so that just you know that i am intending to do that just sort of them them to that i think that the dashboard document that we got from lexington is excellent and also helped him meeting members in that way so you want to talk about that as a part of it as part of the sort of summer and into the fall work so i'm going to push that off and i appreciate that and i think that's a safe thing thought and it's well worth a serious consideration i know that the boers like me and try to do that i think i've not done that so far in part because it's a little bit hard to judge sometimes and i try to do it more on the fly so that you know when folks come in for example i try to make sure that there is an ample opportunity to kind of hear what they have to say and and i think that you know a particular issue for us i try to put the ones of first that are the most important ones so you know if we put in a real ample weight against that so it's a bit of a judgment call  that i'm trying to do on the fly but i hear what you're saying especially if you're trying to you know come in from the outside and listen to the part that you care about knowing when that's approximately i see how that's valuable so let me let me fuck a bit on the way you and i can talk about the way that works well or poorly for you  ok why don't you know more thank you with all it's just that one other point i thought was really good at the league of women voters meetings where you sort of summarize it and went through the individual department heads or anyone from the work he was available to answer questions that said i'm going to presentation to presentation seem to small to flow very smoothly i thought everyone's questions got answered and it was done within the two hour limit that we were all hoping for but i thought that was very effective as well thank you i mean one of the things that has been brought up in the past and bob has bro the past and others too is that and it's actually something to be done more as a war in committee in the past as we've spent more time during the spring and actually going through the details of you know an individual departments so like you know like having general government for example essentially do a presentation on what's going on a job or government or in the past it actually has to be that members from the staff would actually comment and present to the work committee we have done that over the last several years wouldn't do it across the board because a lot of these departments of particular and general government aren't that interesting but if there were some big issue that were cut that was coming up or for instance we do get it from the education subcommittee because the superintendent comes and does an entire power point missed something we're coming up in public safety that was interesting we might want to do it in public safety is a big number but it often doesn't have humongous changes to it so that's a part of the reasons why we haven't maybe done it is that there haven't been some wholesale reason or wholesale issue to deal with but because that would certainly add to the number of meetings as well to keep in mind but i mean there's no we've always brought a department head in when we felt that there was something that department to discuss we've had diane from h r come when there were things to talk about in that scenario  temp department heads have a little air time that they have the tell meeting members and others see the presentations from department heads because i think they are by and large quite impressive and it's good for people to know directly from them what i mean we present our summary of what they've said to us but sometimes the details are valuable to spread and i think actually as a tell meeting member i value the times when i heard from peter kass and you know or when clancy or you know the chief whatever about what was going on and i think that those those times that we used to hear them more when the work committee did those joint presentations in january for a town meeting members with the board of selectmen in the school committee so maybe there's a forum like that which would be better as a choice but i do think that that is a valuable thing to have the department heads have a chance to speak directly to a broader audience is about what it is they do because it's it's very i you know it costs a lot of money but it's it's very important work so so i think it's probably worth having us reflect a little mean that's a that's a sort of a big decision if you take a path that's different from what adam said which is that you know have people come in when they were kind of important issues and do it in a bit of a surgical way but if you instead say all right we're going to literally have every every department had come in and the police chief going to talk o is going to talk and jay markets are talking blah blah blah blah and you get on the west that's a very significant amount of time they're going to they're going to do preparation it's a big deal so i think if we were to if we were to go down that path i mean we would have to believe and i think david you would have to you're welcome to comment if you like you know one of you but maybe some of you think a little bit about and see if there is if any aspect of that is worth incorporating or whether we put the way we did it this year is perfectly fine so if you want to say well i would say i think it does consume a lot more preparation time when you ask a department head to come before the warrant committee and speak publicly on camera it does consume preparation time and you know more then more than i think you would or we would that then by all means you know i mean we can say to we're blue in the face you know the public works department has lost twenty seven employees and nine hundred eighty and things are different and so on but unless someone gets up and actually says what the effect of that you know what is it that the public works department has to do every year i think that that is valuable information and i'm not saying it has to happen every year from every department or whatever but i do think it would be too bad to lose that entirely because i do think it's valuable and it does educate people right and i do think you know to me extent that they fall under the executive problem i think that's something that we would need to coordinate and that we could work on together to become you talking about them coming before the work or you know coming be here i'm actually talking before before a town meeting and or there weren't many briefings but but i think coming here on the camera is a small step i don't know i mean you know it's not clear to me that just coming to us i think we are all relatively in the know with regard to what the departments do and so if there are you know as adam said if there's a particular issue that we need to know about her discuss or make some decision about or something then that is reasonable but but just in terms of the public education aspect the bigger meetings are what i have in mind yet i would also add they do all come before the board of selectmen yes on campus i know that's true ok so there might be a little bit of overlap but we definitely want to avoid redundancy money and i don't feel that we're very much connected with them we have occasional joint meetings but actually but it's i never i feel that we're it's quite separate tracks and i'm wondering if there might be a way to have at least more frequent contact or more substantive contact between the work committee and capital budget i think you may have been gone when emory was here are you here with emory came for and we voted at all except the budget because i was here a bit ok but in that in that format it's the capital budget committee is basically cannot lead it is deliberations and we're kind of we're sort of ratifying what they did so that you're saying maybe more of an interim kind of check in that may make some sense yes jenny many thoughts about that the capital budget you know is presented in the book just like the the war committee budget so the work committee  the capitol budget quests you know it the way the process works is very much like this one so that you know you get all the requests over desires questions if you have them they get sent to the department heads and then the capital budget committee meets with each department head to go over the requests and get the answers to the questions and ask new ones at that point then once all the information is gathered then capital budget committee starts paring it down starts doing straw polls and trying to figure out what we think are the priorities for the year and how those fit together so i'm not sure at what point it would be helpful to the work committee to have input into that process or to to hear about what is going on presentation in a town meeting really informative and i thought to myself well i want to work to me and a lot of what and a lot of questions about a lot of what you know like how much is already committed and how far out it goes and you know all the stuff that she presented that was really interesting to me that's part of it is just having some sort of not so much each project and heinie on the projects that you're already looking at i don't really think we need to double team on that but i think in terms of just understanding  overall budget and how it well even just having a discussion at the beginning of the process about you know what the capital budget is for that year where came from how much of it is already encumbered by debt for the right reason or another and just sort of a document and maybe a little discussion about what's going on and then sort of indication of what the scope of the requests is because they're always get if you have already turning your survey thank you very much if you have not please share it in terms of discussion of summer work and then kind of like i think we've in the past we talked about kind of sort of deep dive kind of projects paul mentioned as well just because greg has such expertise there and a great knows the stuff so well that if you maybe ought to do it with a fair amount of independence but i'll just give folks a warning that i may be reaching out to some some folks it for a little bit of help on that one particular that a month ago or so with me or more and you know there's a lot of work that actually goes into generating that certainly the first time around there's a lot of work that has to be done to kind of like establish that and updating it is not as not as painful but certainly to do it that would be a big project that we would either spend time over the summer sometime over the summer or potentially just you know in the fall when we have not as much kind of immediate business there to really dedicated me of a time to actually doing that and i think that would really require probably everybody to kind of help out and some i project but it's one of those things where and i read it very quickly so you know i can't say that i studied that in any real sense but that there was an enormous amount of very detailed information with half a dozen or ten gra a page and i just wasn't sure what the takeaway was for my quick survey so where we about compiling a huge amount of information without the purpose being thought out same time out of absolutely those might say the same thing i saw examiner when i first joined the war committee info curtis chaired we did the first the stab we decided to beef up the war committee report you remember it was this big monstrous document and had tons i remember saying they're calculating how many miles of road every year we did and how much per mile it cost and doing these big tables and we were talking we were going through every little thing and every little department you know how much does every time they call a town meeting what's it cost but you know and it was it was this big breakdown of a lot of information that just seemed and not the useful other than the fact that it was cool to have i mean if it was a tremendous amount of work and then that work committee report got pared down and because at the time like general government now was combined into administrative and financial but we did separate ports for every little department with every little breakdown of every little thing that every little department does and i still have it like one hundred something pages and it was huge but i don't think anyone read it and b i don't think it really i don't think it didn't a thing because i think we are much more punchy and there's much more punch of much more impact with doing it now in the format we do it than we did then with this monster's amount of information that it was cool but i agree with roy why i mean what if there was a guess if if the town if the selectmen or the town administrator said you know we would really like you to do this research so we could use it for this  might change my mind if there was some purpose behind it i'm not afraid to do work but if there's no purpose and just work for the sense of coming up with cool figures i don't care to do that actually well go on the other side a little bit i have to  what one is that any with any dashboard document like that you can start slowly you can build it over the years because it doesn't have to you know you have to get to forty six pages right away don't have to do all of what lexington did immediately school departments often have  this that are available on the websites and they are valuable and they're partly valuable i think because of the sort of trending summaries that you get on those pages so there was an analysis i can member of the categories but you know doing well moderate and not doing well was sort of the the idea but that was paired with the graphs which gave you a very quick indication about the sort of where where the problem areas it reminded me of all of the discussions that jim williams has raised with us lately about how we can look at where the risks are what the future looks like what we should be looking at if we could get a reasonably sized to dashboard like that i think it might be actually very bad and i think it takes a lot of thought because the things can get unwieldy i mean i think forty six pages was too many it was too long too big too much in it but what would be the valuable indicators how would you know what would you like to look at every year if you could and what could be maintained with relative ease over time because once it's established maintaining it actually you know you don't have to reinvent it every year and it's it can be a very useful public document as well as just a planning document i think so well i will say i mean i thought was interesting but at the same time i'm also on a sort of a data nerd myself and i and i'm definitely sympathetic to the notion that you know you can always run more analysis you can show more numbers you can crunch more stuff but the question is is it actually useful is that it is it actually informing choices is it actually helpful to someone who's making a decision if you're just creating stuff for the sake of creating it and not actually informing decision making that you know i suspect none of us have a lot of time for that and those reading it are going to talk about either so i'm sympathetic to that thought other comments framework in which to evaluate it and then secondly i think the looking at some of the comparable towns and where we stand also can be helpful but i agree that it doesn't need to be this long even to have this much information i just find it very easy to grasp i like the fact that they kind of look at things marginal favorable depending on if there's a lot of change going on in belmont right now in terms of its you know and the school apartment and roland and other things that can you either we have either kind of look at the school department or we look at it but we don't really look at the overall picture and i know when i first came on the work with a lot of  that so i'm not sure whether they produced the entire thing or whether a finance committee take their point but the other question i would just have is how does this relate to the financial task force how does it relate to the finishing task force which stay together for another year but i don't think it's planning to stay together as an ongoing maybe david has more information on that but it doesn't feel like there's this is more of a financial picture in a different company like yes i think it's good timing though because the financial taskforce data that was accumulated may be a good basis for establishing some of this trend data right i mean instead of losing it if you couldn't capsulated in something like this kind of document then you wouldn't lose that you'd be able to update it and it would be seems to me that  if it was if it was possible to make a list of one of the ten things of quantitative nature that i really like to know about the town of goma that i don't already know think keep it manageable and focused to some administratively feasible and then you know some limited experiment here might be worthwhile i'm just wary of the open ended kind of diffuse project ok well look i think that it's useful to talk about at least some we can i mean pick it up a bit in the fall i'm not hearing you know an enormous groundswell of enthusiasm for generating you know a forty six page similar document i think it may make some really important or illuminating and we might pick up and do some work on those so when we think about that a little bit we can talk yet in the fall about if there are you know five or ten k p eyes that we might want to choose and then maybe you know create the beginning of this and  i am one who does think you know who tends to think more information is better more is better but if i were to prioritize this report with all that we have on our list i would hate to see you know the type of time and energy that went into the financial task force report you know be allocated again to produce another report in a different form it's a lot of work to say well maybe the good of the town staff or the town administrator can do it and with all the priorities we have i'm not sure that would be the best allocation of town resources we do have the financial task force report and i think it is our intent to work off that and updated you know and not just shelf it a lot of work went into that a lot of good suggestions you know we did begin with some forecasting of future data and one of the things we talked about and which i will certainly support is building upon that report by updating the information each year and then forecasting based on real information as as we go forward as we go forward in time certainly if this is a project the warrant committee wants to take on i mean i mean that's your decision i personally would prefer to see the warr committee looking at looking at and analyzing some very large long term trends that are going to have tremendous impact on this talent like for example what you're going to do with the pension liability maybe working with the selectmen on all peb and you know i think in the fall i'm going to be coming and i'm going to ask you to start looking you know with the board selectmen and the school committee on the potential impacts of the uplands project and pushing village because you know we've got building permits for want and this summer you may see building permits issued on the other and you know if you if you want you know if you want my direction i would rather see your focus on that because we need to start planning for now if we need another elementary school you know clean need another fire substation because it takes  that we were in a sort of make this become a this project but just to be fully here and show it to the sense that we identified five or ten things that we might do we would do it right so i have personally just speaking for myself i have a very high bar for asking david's office to do anything new so there are enough stuff to do so if something is you know we think it's critical for the town and that's it that's one thing or that or this or the only repository of information leaks of run free to watch that may very well require some focused effort look at any else we want to say about about this stuff broadly yes i mean this is that we sort of went directly into directly into the dashboard but i'm just curious about about me and especially with with sammy here how we see the different focus or different breakdown of work in terms of in terms of looking at the open stuff that would come out of whatever so we're of course have been now asked by town meeting to have to produce a report by a date certain on pensions what it was passed and it was passed  here i will speak to that specifically but if you want to comment on what you guys are approaching the open question here well yeah well i mean what what we are doing if we haven't done already it will happen any time we are going to advertise on our website that we're formulating this committee and we're going to encourage people to submit applications and resumes those who are interested in serving i as an individual now not speaking for the board as an individual i would certainly welcome coordination with the large committee and i would encourage one member of the warrant committee to also serve on our opeth committee because i think it's helpful you know i think it's helpful to have a person report to warrant committee whose understand and intimate with the process that the board of selectmen pointed committee has gone through i think the objective is that our  committee our report would also be available around off top or fifteenth at least that's what we are going to try our best to do and you know presumably you know recommendations and decision the course of the coming months about how to do that i mean if you and then we'll talk about having a member for more committee which may very well be great but we'll talk about what that going to was like any other comments before we move on as i think that actually has to be a joint the actuarial tables just to be really clear i mean i think that will look at the various options on the pension side that that greg sees in his knowledge of you know because he knows about this stuff as much as anybody and and it whether it does make sense for us to figure out how to coordinate potentially through membership like having great on the subcommittee or committee and potentially other ways so i will we'll continue to talk about that ok so i'd like to move to the minutes there are  so the people who were absent for that one word to renew the ten year license with comcast cable license you know i would like to you know thank publicly and really recognize  jonathan green and mark carthy because it was a twenty month negotiation session you know they've really worked hard on this and they were able to get some very good concessions from the cable companies for for example one concession they were able to get was comcast will pay the town five percent of its course and you will revenue annually it was four and a half percent in the previous contract so that's a significant improvement in addition to that comcast you know that the five percent from gross revenues goes to operation of belmont  media center in addition to that comcast will be giving forty five thousand dollars a year for equipment and capital upgrades so we do have a ten year agreement that commenced a of october third two thousand and fourteen our cable television advisory committee worked very hard to achieve good results and of course the other important aspect of this is this sets the stage for our permits foundations are in a lot of the underground infrastructure most of it's and so they are full steam ahead right now in questions where cushing square they have submitted one of the conditions in their purchase and sale agreement for them to acquire the parking lot is to provide us with information to satisfy us that they have the financing and the financial where with all to construct the entire project because we don't want to sell them the parking lot without having the entire project proceed so they have submitted that information to us and the board of selectmen is going through the process of reviewing that information we are having a meeting this friday this friday it looks like friday  afternoon which would be an executive session meeting to actually review the financial information with our consultant powers and sullivan accountants c p a s and our attorney  f necessary so that's proceeding you know once the selectmen are satisfied that the financing and the financials work then the next step would be closing on the sale of the parking lot you know there are other details to work out you know for example our agreement does provide that they have to didas fifty parking spaces the parking spaces we are losing in the parking lot we are getting back in the underground parking of the projects but these are other details that will be worked out but i as i sit here right now i see a closing occurring in july on the parking lot possibly and i see some some conditions it is a for a lot subdivision and there is a conservation commission approval to develop three of the four mods the fourth lot is the one closest to wetland area  and that needs its own order of conditions so the developer is in the process of preparing an application for that lot they were meeting with but it is anticipated that they will be meeting with the conservation commission for their oficial hearing june twenty third i think it's god's will for does that sound right first of twenty first the third ok third week of june and depending on how that goes center is on track we did sign the construction pontiac at the work is proceeding great and you want to give an update on the pool i know you mentioned earlier you know the pool we're looking to open the pool august tenth which would be a monday we're behind schedule obviously because the winter really socked us badly but i just open it on a monday to have the staff have a little shakedown during the work week before it gets hammered on the first weekend it's open and the idea is to have some sort of a party maybe that weekend having cutting something like that even though it'll been open a few days we don't want to schedule the party too soon and then end up it gets delayed opening and then we have to cancel it so but it's coming along we picked colors we were picking colors of umbrellas them types of benches and chairs it's getting down to that matter which is almost getting exciting you've seen them they're out there constantly now wrapping this up and luckily we had the you know if we talked about the health department the state issue we said we couldn't have that island in the middle of the little pool and we couldn't have the slide and we had them come in and we talked with them we got the slide but we lost the island which i think if we had to get half a loaf we got the better half of the loaf the savings on that doing the island in the middle actually is pretty good and we're between that and some extra fund raising money we've got we've been able to add things like the chairs and tables and umbrellas and things that we had not had in the budget so we're actually getting the ability to do a lot more with the with this and have a little eating area and a vending machine area and things that were not in lockers and things that were not in the original bid and i presume are selling full permits at this point already right up or permits are sold i believe if you buy them before the end of th hundred two hundred so doing the right so there's going to be some program to discount them because i think everyone understands it was a bad winter but the it's going to it's going to be interesting the buildings are going to end up with the colors basically of the presentation that we gave sort of like a khaki green with like a cream trim there's some sample colors on there actually there's a gray on there now which is primer don't panic and then on top of that we've been painting some sample colors to look at them and they didn't come out right so those are not the colors we're going to use we thought it was green and it looked to yellow of detail but it's all that's all coming together mean we're start picking out though the the drawer where the cash goes and all the little details and all the wiring is maddening the level of detail we met to like ten thirty at night last time but so there's going to be an increase to some of the after school programs that tony that finance trying to get a very good analysis is how much space each of the buildings is being used by these programs we want to make this is consistent some time and the superintendents and finance director met with the representatives from each of these programs they talked about it before and i think that seems to be going will be two year contracts put in place and similarly with the poor things too and held in that is an organization that and they spent about six hundred hours in the pool so we're going to raise the price to fifty dollars an hour for the first year up to seventy for the second year and there are some concern a couple people came last night worrying about how that might affect their in rome and if they have to raise their fees so we are going to speak with them again october to see how that might change but that's forward and then there's going to be a small increase to the breakfast and lunch prices by just a quarter but the new food service director wants to get a revolving kind of place so that he can begin to update some of the very old equipment in a lot of the kitchens in the schools and there are little things like he's bringing bread in from indies and there's sort of a local farm sourcing so i think he's got some great ideas that even that little tiny bit of a different school help and the last thing is the kindergarten fee as you might know the governor's budget had taken away the full day kindergarten fee the house put it back the senate took it away and there is no resolution yet so what we did was to vote to raise the fee to thirty five hundred dollars right now it's twenty nine hundred with the idea that if there was some of this reinstated at some point there would