be lowered it currently is thirty five and since the road has been shut for us for almost two years i was hoping that we could before we open it lower the speed limit as it once was to twenty five and possibly at the intersection o valley broke and would make it a four way stop that intersection has a lot of accidents and as time has been living there for a while cars are going faster and faster especially more trucks change a lot in the i think it's been ten years that it was twenty five it's been ten years that it's the speed limit to thirty five and there's now i think seven thousand homes on ballard and i think some more to come but it just seems that it's harder and harder to cross the street and there's many accidents there so i was hoping for a four way stop i know many of the neighbors that i've talked to have commented as well and over the past six and a half years i've mentioned that i just haven't done the right follow the right pathways or talked to the right person to allow right and so my thinking was before we opened it maybe we could lower the speed limit again to twenty five and put in a four way stop a and at the bottom of that they broke hoping that possibly they could recreate the turn or the curve because the vehicle scrape as you go so if you're coming along valley broken you want to make our right hand turn it's very difficult to do that and when you slow vehicles because you're slowing to try to make a right hand turn into what is where we left so i've talked to several of the businesses in the area there's a refractory plant on the edge and they say that it's just very difficult most of my neighbors that i communicate with say that it's easier to pull out of the street at night because you can see the lights and i know there's been numerous accidents not so much since the rent's been closed but i noticed when we had to go through different neighborhoods there was a lot in the media about people speeding and complaining and those are people that go through my neighborhood once the road opens up so it's just my hope that you know if you could tell me  there's a state road so we would have to make a request that they consider lowering the speed limit twenty five thirty that is the state they move in strange and mysterious request pound to conduct studies to determine whether they would be willing to change the speed limit my only comment is if you good change speed limits should be the entire life not just rort of the road so the good evening my name is don riser and i live up one fourteen wyndham record thank you very much for giving me the opportunity speech he this evening and his regarding off first energy as proposed tree removal plan i know the board or the council's fully aware this a looking at some of the responses you've given us in your emails i guess my real concern is they're telling you one thing and they're telling us something different they ha told us that they are going to clear cut and spray herbicides on any tree that has a potential to grow greater than ten ford this is read corliss of how low it is from a topography standpoint in the bas ah but provided it's within their hundred foot easement that's the course of action they're going to take and it doesn't appear that they've done or of told you folks the same thing when you take a look at peters would park and you look at towers three four five and six in the park those towers are not much different than our towers which are eight nine in windham year and not much different than tower nine and ten which are not trained circle and on s far they're working from a fifty four year old easement back then that property was all formally and all of the residents clearly understand their rights and support that we need to make sure that we understand their mate it's issues but their approach is extremely aggressive what they're trying to do is they're they're not using the easement there they're abusing it is really what they're going to do you need to make a site visit at the location because you have several trees on township property that are down in the retention basin which is a storm water runoff they've indicated to us that they are going to cut those trees spray them and not remove that's going to give the base and water flow issues depending upon the herbicides that water flows flow goes down through the beep out area absolutely makes no sense we're not looking for a fight really with the first energy we want to reach an understanding that addresses their nee but also protects our properties and doesn't scar the area but it you know for with first energy depending upon who you talk to you get a little bit of a different story each time as to what they're going to do all we want to do is make sure that you know we protect that area and protect our property rights we look at this as a property or property rights issue peters took a very aggressive no leadership approach on act thirteen and we ask that you consider to re evaluate this in their plan so that we don't go down that same route and again we fully understand what what they need to do but each time they talk to us they talk about trees that have the potential to hit law ins the quite frankly there are there are there are several that we understand that the majority of which that fall under to underneath the wire line but within the border line will never row into generations to ever impact the we did have a meeting we requested a meeting with first energy and they had so all of their staff here that is responsible for hundred or so foot of right away and that they want to remain consistent throughout their thousands of miles of these high tension winds they went into these tension lines can sag as much as twenty feet mr quest i understand that i read your e mail i'm very appreciative of that ok but when you take a look at the facts under ferk and i triple e their standards and what they're telling you is not correct ok you don't have that for the fast majority of the trees that they plan to come in and clear cut at all honestly folks you need to just come take a walk you take a look at your property ok and the trees in you really need to be as supportive as you can because this has an impact on us on stonehenge and down on long view as you go through the entire township i'm married so thank you  access road too but first i didn't think there was a opportunity for them to get there fairly they found an access road they said they would go in and and remove those trees ok again the skipper was thank you very much we told honor also the audience would like to speak on a not agenda item yes t v peter glasser one forty three on view drive i walked the trail around peter's lake frequently and i've noticed a recurring problem over the course of at least the past year which is sections of the trio anywhere from fifty feet long to one hundred feet long have been spotted with significance amounts of course nor from obviously groups of writers owners and i have two questions for in st guarded the first is because i've never seen it and your first is how many of you sitting up here i have ever seen not just in peter's anywhere in this country visit and they're absolutely amazed honest and astonished at the amount or the potential destruction of the going to be doing to our neighborhood alone in through in the mirror and again in stonehenge and the other areas affected i would just like to so have you seen where they've marked the trees i have in the amount of destruction with the spring of the herbicides which they have not called for in the easement we've all has seen the one nine hundred sixty documents that they presented to us that granted the hundred foot hall meeting i've sent e mails to each and every one of you to come to our town hall meeting and not only support us but share with us the information the first energy sharing with you because they they're all telling us something different you're leveling the seminars one thing the rise or something else in there's no a very consistent plan of how the information is disseminated to the residents and the process of which person you speak to along the way so again we came away from holder which she's an area manager right re of them have come out they came out and addressed us as somewhat of a group of homeowners association members and individuals there is no clear and concise plan for them because they design thing different peter's what park that they're doing to simmons farm that they're doing to my personal property that they're doing to other people's personal properties and nobody's consistent with exactly what they're doing they feel say that they've said that they wouldn't need any more and that are you right depending on what the situation is they they may have to dress it differently but when they spoke with us they indicated that they tried to take the property owner's concerns into consideration and as mr burke was said we're pretty i thought clear to us that they were town hall meeting which they of course have declined to come because they want to deal with people on an individual basis but when you put neighbors in a community that talk and how come they're doing something different for this property this park being this property and although i understand and i get the easement affects each property differently they're willing to clear cut and remove my stumps and take the trees but they're not willing to do it on the next property or they're not going to spray or science here or simmons farm and nothing against simmons farm but they're not touching their trees and their trees are worse than ours they're not dealing with individual property owners on a one on one basis because the trees they want to remove completely from my home my hillsides going to fall down they big they don't want to hear it i don't care they said that's your responsibility and that's your problem is right to use not right to abuse not the right to take my personal property and not have any consideration or working relationship i get what they've got to do they've got to maintain their lines my personal property there's no towers and the lines are forty to fifty feet above any tree that i have i'll trim them i've made every compromise that i can personally think of as long as rests excuse me as most of our neighbors have but they're not willing to come in and compromise with us so that's why we need implore you guys for help as step one so i would like can somebody come out and take a psych that one of you take the time and just come out and take a look and come back in and relate  everybody else exactly what they're going to be doing i don't think there's any problem with coming down i don't think there's any issue that i can do that i've sent everybody emails and have gotten not one reply back i got a reply back from mr burke was today and i understand people are busy vacation they get on that i communicated to us that certain trees they will not allow within their right of way as certain trees they will so that is how it was communicated the fact there was wasn't there there were some people that had other thing they explained to us is that if i remember correctly they do this on a five year were correct what their explanation i heard was that they need to address issues now because he and other five years potentially things that they  feet or under it there is a common sense aspect to this as as individuals as human beings as people that live and work in this neighborhood well i understand if you're coming back in five years how will we let it go come back in five years and then if it's got to go then it's got to go but in the next five years i mean every talks about green space and all of these things but yet you kind of come in and just take it all with for no reason other than you can so i just ask email you mean we can set a time that would be great if anybody else could come out and again i personally invited every one of you to our meeting on the seventeenth so if you could come and share what frank's energy shared with you ask to the rest of us and the other residents that are coming that would be great can i get anybody to commit to coming on the seventeenth saplings two feet tall they're taking because they're fifty foot easement runs through the middle of my driveway which never told about when i purchased my property never told about the hundred foot easement power hannah never told me benjamin marcus homes never told me took their bed never told me it could go on forever that's great so they're going to take my two foot saplings because they have the potential to no way for them to access this how are they going to get it out i have they don't worry that our don't know the herbicides that they say they're not going to spray that they've told our entire neighborhood or the seven families that this you know the facts that they're going to spray i would like to see the prescription of the stuff that they're going to spray how it effects my children my animals my neighbors the wildlife that lives in the white lands down there sure how it affects everything could they give you an eye they give you anything for that i know they did not they  plummet and it's going to be it's work i'm in the process of trying to sell my house what are the chances first energy's going to come through they're going to kill everything in the neighborhood and my property that is going to go down i'm never going to be able to what it looks like from sitting back here in the e mails that we get well you know we have the same thing on our property too when sorry you should have known that when you purchased your house and it should have been in your deed while it wasn't in our deed well that was  because i lived the homeowners association it was never in any of our deeds ever get the information you need get out so i you know it's never in anybody's deed had i known that it was there was a fifty foot easement that ran through the middle of my give would be great i mean they're they're coming through and they're going to ruin peter's township and they're going to make it look like west hanover township ok thank you they were also the authors would like to speak on this section of peters's not seward we went to last meeting council did approve the planning molecules which will allow both these laws to have online drip irrigation sewage systems everything's in order planning commission did review this plan at thirteen twelfth meeting in recommended council approved it subject to the six conditions listed in my memo to mr sylvester dated july  surveying dated revised six sixteen fourteen this is a consolidation of two properties matt peters c two joining province in the corner of hidden access then handled once the properties are combined if they were strict did to how much access well that depends on the next step which will come in with a site plan to develop it with  done once and that was relative to billboard and basically what we do is we will identify areas of our ordinance that are potentially invalid in this case because can you bring in the language of you know proposal next meeting or whatever you can we also have some type of a time table this you know agreed upon that you know for reviewing ordinance if we chose to do that right and that and that's going to be for the manager in order to decide what that's going to look like you also if we get to the point where we're coming up on the six months we have a general idea of what the board wants to do we also can take shelter under any further discussion i did have just a few clarifying questions there was a discussion about word consciousness page count and i wondered how you expected that might affect the price because this thirty nine isn't a final number according to what i look where you were you you wouldn't do that no you wouldn't do you would have them do it to be consistent what we have the ability to do is you for some reason we decided we did not want to continue to use the codification for you know we will get  five zero four spondon says mr sylvester yes first thing on one correspondence you notice there is a notification from the american arbitration believe mr smith would like to request a brief executive session and then we would come back in services to this to make any potential motions on this matter agreed long  states because they're required to be under state law but we asked them to give us a price both with and without trade in there and the end of the low b is john deere they're giving us the biggest amount on the trade in their trade and it's forty six thousand compared to thirty five and thirty three with the other two companies i think because they have a buyer for that vehicle and position is there will go after the resident to either raised himself or charge him do they have they're not going to pay for it and i know that the resident is very adamant that we go in there and get this raised immediately that may provide some ambiguity that would rule in their favor i don't necessarily agree with them maybe the positions of the hearing board conclude the hearing is tomorrow night and i just want to plan to go out to the funding completed in two thousand and nineteen will leave when i when i raise it to the words we need to do something start something now as far as looking at ways to accomplish the traffic between seventy items for next meeting agenda from what i want to point out that we are doing that work on me you know when they put that patching there there's a division there this big it wasn't there one last thing just a piece of information in august the committee meeting will be hosted by peter's on the twenty first so if you would add that to the calendar and then whatever if you need help planning mr sylvester