church if there's any specific questions where the evidence to trust my co counsel will take care of that with their clients on the surface here due to the numerous terrorism counts charges of which the defendants were acquitted in the hours of recordings made by the undercover a legal container how is the ad not incredibly strong evidence of his and can be tedious to be now just to builds the device it's the intent  fifty dollars the cases that you cite on that issue in paul charges of attempted arson and so when it when someone is charged with attempted arson you have to prove the substantial step you have to catch him pouring convictions be reversed if you understand now for the questions plan to make any plans to do anything to throw people at that at that time and finally as much as the  good morning ron is again my name is amanda a woman i represent badly i'd like to focus my time this morning on the improper introduction of other crimes evidence and then briefly address a few points regarding reasonable doubt that specifically relate to mr suspicion that this crime actually happened because again there's absolutely nothing besides me and then you got to look at to the context in which the statement was made or this group had been drinking and very rightly doing drugs for a great deal of that in your view the state he has to come forward when that person against whom the statement is made has admitted to participating in criminal conduct of the state he has to either prove that they were mere suspicion is if the state came in with a statement from somebody else saying i think right battery was involved in a fire bomb at the county sheriff's office  that would be mere suspicion but when the perpetrator himself says this is what i did seems like more than mere suspicion respectfully your honor i disagree i think we have a situation here where we've got point in time previously we have no idea when he claims to have done this and that there's no player from a bad county sheriff's office there's no photographs there's no witness says there's absolutely nothing and under thing bill that is insufficient to county sheriff's station so he doesn't doesn't his statement about what he did in the past combined with his instruction to the other defendants about how to make  ties more than mere suspicion now it is there for one thing this acid bomb statement took place at least twenty minutes before they even got the bottles off the top of the refrigerator it took place about an hour with a threat to the undercover officer offered to purchase gas for the group to build these things and it was approximately an hour and a half before the construction actually began so he cannot conflate all these statements and all of these actions that occurred and pretend that they occurred that there was an admission to throwing in the acid yes doesn't rise above the level of mere suspicion but when you combine it with the evidence in the case that he's instructing the others how to make officer this is not coming from him he was not volunteer ing this out of the blue bear this was an undercover officer who was specifically requesting instructions on how to create these simple i says and better yes responding but again better we did not go with them better we didn't get the battles with them he did not go with them to get the gas and i strongly disagree with the state's attorney's suggestion that he was on the porch the entire china even the officers admitted that he was at least in an out on the porch and in the house and they bears this out because he is suddenly billions of minutes at one point he's silent on the recording for at least three minutes if there's another question on the recording where he said there's absolutely no way for mr better way for a stretch of thirteen minutes and this is even when they're pouring the if it does not meet up to the standards established by the state it has a duty to overturn these convictions anything for the thank you thank you thi say huntington's disease which is a terrible disease has all these effects is evaluated by exactly the professionals that he requests they all come back with similar reports interest me one thing about june struction one day and i come in because the next remember that's the danger many decisions have been made by the sandman and we can't be confident that they were made with him actually knowing what was going on a hearing as a half a day to make sure that this extremely complicated trial the shooter so that every single thing that was possibly happening these young men were on trial for their life i mean the terrorism property which is personal property over one hundred fifty dollars and to be strict about the state's offer on that that one fact that that one police officer spent six hundred dollars on his personal best that he saw to so that obviously the defendant requires more requires more facts and that's simply not present in fact these defendants called this science experiment to build them a bit and then they put them aside and went upon their evening and there's no indication of these defendants here was his physical ability to sit through the trial at the time of trial and at the time of the offense he was found to be unfit to stand trial insane at the time of the offense mentally and physically surprising about that