severe pervasive framework is analyzed in the circumstances through the lens a reasonable woman this like all questions of fact must be considered in the context of the times times have changed since the severe pervasive standard w there and hold her there for several seconds before moving on to a central long enough for over a half hour after her when this happened so that failure to respond with the only thing that they guaranteed they would do we will watch them is where this starts but this continues and that no one follows up with simmons and there's really no evidence mr misleading anyone followed up with mr schieffer either did not what happened here is that mr simmons were a sexual harassment on the st occasion and instead of actually doing something about it her manager sent her back to work with her harasser in which he was able to then escalate his behavior and it was know what ormal store management sitting down and recording they were telling him he stopped his behavior so i don't think even if you look back at a previous case law that says there has to be there's two pieces to you having to do need to have a remedial action what is the effectiveness and the other is also the future deterrents for this and other harassers and its star is assessing the effectiveness here  simmons where there's only been escalating nature and it's only gotten worse since she can that be it was not an effective response from hagan it is you impossible to based on the sample size of what we have here to really make any sort of justice whether this is behavior directed because she's a woman versus because she's a coworker  simmons found his behavior objection that happened within a day of when she made the complaint on to her sixteen and we know there was always his response is response was i didn't realize that i was doing anything objectionable i was trying to upset anyone and i will try to change my behavior and there's no evidence and it was affected there's no evidence that there was any further issue with his behavior is hardly a reasonable man time even for a response and certainly to talk to him within a day which the end it shows that they did it is certainly by any standard recently prompt response no evidence that she found is behavior objectionable or was concerned about it or or found it in any way problematic she just noted d yeah he does the same thing to me is an individualized inquiry has an well there's to do your work and in this case that's clearly not the st let's talk about whether severe we have here an individual who is merely looking at something or other than there's evidence of severity which are things like sexualized comments touching intimate body parts here we have the evidence shows that he judged her best reaching around her to get the temperature high but he doesn't touch description of her subjective reaction to it only goes to that portion of the element which is her subjective yashin to his behavior but there's simply no evidence that our objective  th which is the day that she made the complaint which suggests anything that happened before that didn't rise to the level of being severe enough for her to have problem with the rd issue that we have is again coached him on that conduct reminded him of the sexual harassment let him know that this could make d coworkers you know uncomfortable and there's no evidence that he never heard half an hour after she makes them play which again atrocious so she tells her parents or jennifer barker about it and then she makes another call to the to the corporate headquarters at that point mrs parks twice tries richard by telephone she's inadvertently dialing the wrong phone number unable to reach or she sends an email to the store and she says if i'm not able to reach or today someone needs to talk to her and get her statement st thing when she claassen tomorrow morning but she doesn't show up take advantage of the meal measures that it was already undertaking to she didn't show up for work when her statement was going to be taken and it's important to note here that she knew that they were going to talk to her when she came in on the t so she knew it ok they're taking steps to address your concerns and yet she failed to show up for work so the the so that her statement could be taken into small confined areas to not take a lunch at the same time as were another employee so all of those actions other than staring have still been unaddressed based at least on the record before the court begins response would have occurred on september th according to your ninety seven dollars if he did not actually follow its policy then to issue her a verbal warning it only waited until after missing his complaint over nearly over a