public's interest to bid two point two million dollars or five year contract out the city would like the interpretation to be any work or other public improvement to be any public work or the public improvement therefore we were dealing with three definitions here the first being that any work which we which it's there's no definition for good reason the plain meaning and work brought to see have occasion to work that is not performed on real property really does together as opposed to i think what you're trying to say is set them apart ending work could be now on not have a permanent nature or public improvement would be on the permanent nature wall if you take the city's definition if you take the city's interpretation that it will be any public work or other public improvement and limited this appalling improvement we would still have brain are certain if you if you look at the definition of public work the again be a public improvement this is a completely different case all the work being done is on public property and there's not any private component to the work being an issue here think that there and put them on sufficient notice that this is a large contract especially for a while chicago a two point two million dollar contract that spans five years and i think that it was the the taxpayers right policy because in those taxpayers they have no chance for notice if you just follow a contract and at the same time you don't hope that you hope for a contract in that the same time you're voting to dispense a competitive bid well there are wider realty to conduct its business but not the wideness because case law has for strict in their interpretation correct but it had the authority to matter into this contract and this is like it's does not require the city to say this is what i'm doing and there is other authority just the whole story or just the general authority own one is because for the city to have entered into this contract i would make sure i understand though you're also says any more or other public improvements shall be constructed street sweeping is not construction vehicle maintenance is not construction and this  are pretty much every single contract needs to be paul who did i think this is important because the state legislature it shows that the state legislature wanted to do that later jim they could and they did but they didn't do it in time if we decide that there's an ambiguity can we also look at other legislation such as prevailing wage and definitions contained area i think that the missile code would be the city residents including their client have no right to know how their money's being spent until after it's approved well if that isn't correct no contract with municipal i apologize for not remembering an actual name l l c in the amount of two point two million dollars will be considered defeated or does it just say improvements maintenance purpose pointed out previously seems to be you know decision to each other when they're not consistent with each other the statutory references you're making and the case law references that have gone before us w the work involved in the contract falls within the purview of division and any other decision would render multimillion dollar contracts like this one in this case on regulated third just because cases under division one center construction projects does not mean that the work in this case falls outside of division one just good one could infer that municipalities always regard this work as covered and therefore no litigation really ensues further but get  construction is not defined under division nine and lastly you only thing that needs to be in the agenda is that the country will be entered into a reasonable approach a reasonable person would assume that a two point two million dollar contract it's a resolution that says in any contract where we are doing maintenance on the city no matter what the man or we here might have read that by this resolution we are waving to two thirds earlier you know waiving the necessary building and two thirds of people will fall back sufficient notice if it happens back in and just see what happens in the year two thousand and ten with the contracts not entered into until two thousand and twelve well i think that would be like invoking the whole board forty which this court has held that in order to writers section and the fact that you have to do such a you have to pass an ordinance rendering that section in effect that as short of that