valid must be order well in order for anybody to be bound by the terms of the agreement and to see what's in the recorded record of what this option means it would be necessary to have all purchase the property who want to know whether that option is a clone title and here's the big thing here is that the the attorney who drafted it mr becker also stated this testimony as long as they were valid with he as long as they were current with their lease payments they could exercise the option the fact of the matter is that option was never exercised prior to them not paying any and i quote lease payments an twenty years and didn't make graft so there you are correct your honor and i'm sorry if i misstated that but the action itself that was brought up to the executors when john doe and that's clean they own the farm they didn't bring the lease they if you want to review three three documents together i suppose you could you could i think this is the job really well but the issue is that none of the parties thought and even the drafting attorney who recorded the option didn't think it was important to include this in the record now mr gordon ness and the should be able to benefit from their errors in drafting to read into a term that is is on is ambiguous and that's why we construction being paid a thousand dollars a month in suddenly we have an option contract to purchase the property under the terms that are there for some price he still contend that there's an issue as to whether or not the term is up for the length of time is there but they continued to just pay him a thousand a month when they had before all of this started with an agreement to continue to do that for twenty years to lease the property for twenty years of that closed right now we have a lease for a thousand a month and if there were no option if the option is never exercised there is no credit obviously isn't valid on mine and the thing is i still contend that we have an issue because is it really a buying the farm i believe that the testimony shows the dog only around so that she was mistaken and then didn't understand even though she also testified that her lawyers played what they needed to do to exercise the option and they basis for making these payments who is more in line with compensation for the father her father or her father in law working for the company that it was for pain in our lease or payment of an option to purchase respect when you're on her answer was  agreement there's no evidence that those thousand other things were being made to organise or in those ten years leading up to the executions that came in the months preceding the execution a handful of them once they started paying him a thousand out and then they reach the agreement that real issues and they don't the presumption is in favor of the prevailing party my clients prevail at trial we have written closing arguments and it's a court that you have the opportunity to review and rely upon making with the lease with the option for christ all the relevant terms we my clients perform consistent with that relating to the breach of contract claim the this court would have to find the judge plans really was against the manifest w determination in favor of john done  discovered that makes no sense it's very important for the school to be aware that the lease was not disclosed until after the litigation many many months after payments were ceased to be made they never said we want to set your lease payments they didn't know that there was any kind of a lease for the store it was why didn't they give in the execution of some kind of these while this litigation was committed well i don't know why that would have happened but i do kno