for social security disability benefits he's been denied and we are sure on and field to this court i'm going to focus on the issue of the need  a l j has to present a complete i thought thirty call to the vocational expert in this case the a l j presented a hypothetical disorder in a personality that's correct he made it clear for and he made this clear finding out what do you understand that the record shows that those mental mental conditions and it was done at behavioral sciences it's specifically delineated and i'm looking at the excerpts of record on page one seventy eight one sevent and or inappropriate their behavior is likely to be unpredictable and inappropriate these individuals are likely to be suspicious and distrustful of others they avoid significant emotional relationships they are likely to be resentful of any demands made upon them by others is that mean however as a matter of law if he hadn't was suffering from multiple personality disorder and anxiety disorder that as a matter of law under all circumstances he would be considered disabled now and in the first place he wasn't suffering he was suffering a personality disorder not a multiple personality disorder personality disorders which personality disorder there are a number of them there often means that they have no remorse they have no capacity to feel for others if that's the case why in this case would mean if he has indeed that disorder why would that tendencies are criminals why in this case would it make a difference it makes a difference in this case because as is reflected by the behavioral science service is described in the record it would indicate otherwise that he is not doesn't have criminal tendencies he's not a person without remorse without compassion you can see that we don't like to get ourselves in a place where we make the decision that everybody who has an antisocial personality disorder is disabled and i would agree with your own in that regard however mr coleman doesn't suffer from just an anti social personality indicated on the hamilton depression from depression scale as they report it's significant that fifty at least fifty percent as they report of individuals who have that much depression would have difficulty working this is a combination of things of the problem is that he did the think problem is that he didn't address these limitations at all either after hearing or in his decision he didn't address them and then distinguish them and say i don't agree with he didn't address them at all and he needs to address them he needs to consider all of the limitations and either find that they aren't valid give the reasons why or find that they are and accept them he didn't ask him for an award of benefits posit your honor is that i have given a complete hypothetical again not in the best format the best format being to add a limitation if you go along and find out where the jobs possibilities  the heart of this case is credibility that's really about what the claimant says he can do and what the record shows he actually has been doing so it's kind of testified at the hearing that he could only sit for approximately five to fifteen minutes and only indicates that he cannot suffer anxiety disorder to the extent that it was dizzy only or did not suffer what is really not what personality disorders that indicates that he and seeing where she has not has been to the doctor and has not claimed anxiety or has not gone to the doctor for a personality disorder rather sort routine items for  that she spoke to his doctor numerous times about his activities that he was doing and why and to get out and wanting to be social and these were there all noted in the medical record and not