one minded in preparing for this argument george c scott performance in the movie patton where he stands and the battlefield in north africa looking out at the american success and out in the answering briefing and i'll reply brief we'll go through the four or five examples that the government had provided to us in those solicitors opinions which clearly show why the coast community case comes to the right conclusion that there was a language is not there and then to a subsequently organized crime the original acceptance of the grant you can only be on behalf of the individuals which is why posting in community comes out the way it does and could never comes out the other way because river thirty years after the grant deed was accepted there the united states came along and formally designated the subsequently organized crime which the i e could do here but they have not yet done so and this is not one of those where  ignoring that accomplishes the designation it's the other way around as opposed to any community finds by ignoring it and you're only allowing the people acquiescing and my clients and their families living on the property for twenty five years government have the power to designate the tribe has the power whether it would or not would be subject to its own regulations and we have to go through the administrative process to see whether that determination would be may make the power position and i think we're very clear in all the briefing below and here that we're making no challenge to title title is held by the united states the question is something less than title essentially a nine ownership issue that has a bundle of morton is not changing who owns title the actual recorded title to the property united states is going to continue wanting it but you're changing the boundary lines within something that the united states owns here whether you're talking beneficial allotment violations under title twenty five section three forty five none of those cases could exist if the quiet title act exception for indian trust land were to come along and eliminate those claims you can't have a three forty five cases are clear one way or the other our position here is anything less than legal title that you're talking about here beneficial ownership as described in the generic terms designated beneficiary or a trust allotment is something less than a challenge the title work forward from essentially nine hundred eighty two and then when congress mandates that his book is going to become the federal handbook on how to handle these issues any acquisition under four sixty hundred eighty one and all of the administrative appeals over the membership in leadership issues it's no wonder that my clients are in a position of not wanting to change their individual ownership rights if you will give it to some government that  and they do not want any other form of development on that four and a half acres four point six acres and that's not an issue of trying to be bought out they want to live there and that's where they have their house there are alternatives to them they could live in town they could live elsewhere they choose to live where they receive this grantley because that's where their families have been for almost one hundred years and that is despite all of the money issues that might be there if some other development a casino or something else were to be caught on that property they are willing to forego that because the property means that much to them there have been no depositions taken in these cases but the government will be set if you worry i suppose as to what the result is what the factories would be doing with the property and why it means so much i can elaborate for the courts benefit but it's not part of the record record on this so there's a lot of cultural significance to the property is what i'm  see i'm just about done i do want to stay on the merits the language in the deed is not perfect it would have been better if the language and against it invention the tribe as it is organized but the language is ambiguous individual's only that's had how coast comes out and is completely consistent with this course this is an input river where there was required to be a subsequent formal designation to get it in the hands of the tribe that's missing here at the record page the record they were pages three twenty and twenty one and three thirty three thirty one the congress saw fit to extend the indefinite nature of the trust allotments after the one nine hundred thirty four not can grow and concepts in indian law we are seeking status as designated beneficiaries of a trust allotment we do not challenge the united states high the united states will continue to have title if we prevail here the court continues allotment versus anybody else under the sun does not affect title title status in united states at the same page the court in kansas concludes because the action does not speak to quiet title to the track the