MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
out of the early days of our western frontier a comment like some of these stories are based on fact and there's no doubt were conceived in the minds of prospects too long alone and the hot and white consumed by first spaniard landed most of them are far more primitive than their brothers in other territories their culture was that of the stone age this story deals with the last days of one such  not mortal enemy to be killed on sight while the number was decreasing the number of their enemy was increasing the anglo or yankee had migrated west and was embarked upon the feverish search for  captured as a baby and the only reason she had been spared was the fact that their hero was the color of yellow gold to the superstitious minds of these primitive people this was a symbol she had been sent to them by the sun understand once in my life i want to be somebody i want to run and be the queen of the house and have all the people come to me for the city i want to make money the honey listen to hear me out just this once now we both want the money but i'm telling you again i just haven't got the wherewithal to buy a place like that before you marry go creek it's deep in indian territory now honey it's no picnic to get there but we can be rich real stinking rich and we won't have to sweat it out in that allows these alone for the next fifteen years as we gain the top of the fast i couldn't help but take a last look at the town there was a feeling of security down there right ahead of us the movie that will be of a different all she wanted to know was when i was coming o and i told her that i might be a long time before we saw the town again she looked up a moment then said this is it again i hope but it's got to be tomorrow night we'd only been a few days on the trail but it was long enough to overhang the party with the smell of trouble from the way taggert was watching the trail i figured he was expecting trouble any time and from watching condon and harden i had a feeling something was brewing there al so i didn't like their little secret powers i got to worrying that if it all exploded lunde nobody would ever get this eagle creek i think i'll go to sleep yeah it just came out of nowhere have you been up to nothing that concerns you and pounds then you're not leaving me out here to die i'm getting out with my gold i'm getting
i don't suppose the idea of thought at all now what am i supposed to do i have a couple doubt and it's awfully nice of you not to give me a ticket wouldn't do too much talk i won't confine myself to talk yet this the next time anything happens to our shipment you're going to wake up and find a half a dozen of those nice shiny trucks to yours ready for the scrap rates this is going to hit us pretty high on the farmer's mind only because our rates were lower what do you make of it i think by chicago attorneys pick me a very bright boy would you like to having the damned that's not necessary yet lever i think i'll go over and all from the proper inducements why don't you let me take care i'll handle it myself the names armstrong well i just came from your office i'm sorry i missed you so that i've been looking forward to having a talk with you you and i have to come to some sort of an understanding exactly dull that's what i had in mind when i had to appoint a relation as you or your job to me you know additional twenty thousand above your receivers feeds it's very tempting you certainly must want this road pretty badly well how about i said three months ago i don't is time you're just in time now that our rates are even armstrong out of that your time just what you expect to gain by this mainly a crack at the farmer's properties contract that you've been getting fat on i'm going to run you out of business armstrong you're not a legitimate trucking outfit you are racketeers now get out of making a bad mistake makes the majority come on man get out the record him so i checked off on myself and then he took every precaution that either you or i could have taken and tell him told me himself that he asked him to be careful the roadmaster will tell you that he of track from me as a parent listen man somebody's got to wreck this road a car load of tomatoes doesn't smash itself gasoline doesn't spray itself over a shipment a lot of wreck that killed those two men last night tied up this entire road and who gets the  we load take that back or prove it i can't prove anything yet glover but get this i'm putting on armed guards and the next time you or your men set foot on railroad property you'll regret pm to meet any competitive bit you whole railroad in a refrigerator car i don't follow you you will  um to this contract with an act of thanks for putting all these men back to work
to probably well but helpful now the whole world see and he said if i was to hide inside it would give him a son and stop him from drinking and drinking and well come on differences let me go protect time and again princess ravioli
ironwork contractor that conner claim was there was an m s j granted on the counter claim and the plaintiff's complaint but more importantly what also happened in this jacks their carrier westfield ultimately said no we don't cover that ended up declaratory judgment case brought by westfield against my client f c appeal the first district affirmed that was that decision came down march eighth two thousand and eleven that to me was the triggering events at that point in time we found apply because you need three things in the final decision final decision we have that here you need identity of the parties you need identity of the cause of action in the d j we don't have identity of the cards we have westfield an insurance company suing f c l and asking the court to find that they don't which they ultimately did so it's westfield versus f c l in the deja in the counter claim it's f c l filing a counter claim for breach of contra yes yes we don't believe there is we don't believe suburban ed and steak and that and but and actually suburban got out of younger blank space and they simply could care less about westfield and breach of contract is a contract they're not the same causes of action they're apples and oranges that's briefly where we're at in this case so we now think the trial court when it by either of the prior judgments it's necessary of course for f c l to convince this court that neither of the prior judgments were pretty close of the amended  which was dismissed on the basis of richard unfortunately f c l has only addressed the declaratory judgment it has completely ignored and fails to provide any argument as to why l the court has to presume that a judgment of the circuit court is correct unless the a problem provides a reason to suppose otherwise f c l has provided no such reason under the of action on the other and now there's no question that there are different clamps and different legal theories asserted in the original account plan and the amended time plan as counsel points out the original and the breach patrick and yet they said that they couldn't have filed the for each contract claim insult the declaratory action was decided well if they're all related and separate causes of action why would they have to wait until the first one was decided until they filed the second i mean it's really impossible to reconcile those two tensions the fact that they have a common or that there was an obligation by j f k to provide additional insured coverage to aff c l now they're claiming the opposite and i don't mean to touch on the merits of the case but i'm simply mean to point out that case and i don't believe i've ever seen by the way i've been practicing for thirty years i don't ever i don't think i've ever seen a defendant on such a claim move to sever just mess on the basis that it's improper to grant a br contract crime in the same suit as as as the injury i've never seen such a motion because i think everybody understands they they do arise out of the same facts at crisis and they can be assert
waiting for the cold characters will compete for a championship make you feel like you were there
as it is a bucket on the day of the suspect there or it renders the suspension a novelty i understand that the defendants all situations the results wong they reinstated greedy state in this situation we had a hearing on the nineteen the judge immediately center the secretary of state on the twenty third they said yeah you're right we're
context of our standard of review and what your burden was probably where you re with that gerberding the drug court was to prove that the factors strongly favor transfer our standard of review is abuse of discretion
in the exhibits as to what happened in the us we wouldn't be here but if you look at the exhibits that were the respondents exhibits three well actually one three twelve twenty one thirty three lot of time on that or not it's not much time one argues still is that there is enough that this is not what and we have it's not like there were no exhibits and we're just talking about testimony mr gerber gave us is  it was there exhibit number one backed up by exhibit two which was the actual terms then on the contrary we put in these supplemental documents to show the financial press picture of on and calling one as a witness but we actually cross examined mr gerber and basically made the argument just me they asked him in essence he gerber had already said using the figures that were referenced in his own report that the net that what he had going down one hundred thousand one thousand and you know maybe shoot me for not there was someone come in and say the same thing that seemed pretty obvious to us that mr we were agreeing with gerber's analysis we didn't have to pay somebody else to come the un and say the same thing if we were using his methodology and the correct documents  if you look at his pages five and six that report he says i'm a drug comparison so those now where the only thing he says that seems to know anything the script of the why you agreed that the hundred thousand dollars appropriate was that he somehow concluded that the fix a assets were worth ninety eight thousand dollars he looked at our exhibit number one said but how do we go from here are saying everything's worth twenty thousand dollars sudden now it's worth one hundred thousand a year and a half later on makes sense to us you know that maybe isn't think the correct result is i don't have all the information i need so you guys go out see if you can agree on the information and then come back if you i would say no and maybe that's the way you may say i'm wrong on the wall but it seems to twenty years during the marriage the request for reimbursement was an alternative request of the court found against the system the issue of whether or not that property was a house or a home body contemplation a marriage and therefore should be considered a miracle and the court basically and basically didn't work and stayed home then the slight were she to free him she was not a bookkeeper no offense to jeff i don't mean to argue the statements she was not the bookkeeper she filled in a form provided by an accountant and a computer that estate taxes about four years back that's all the numbers we had at that point the all the numbers we had available to us that point to be honest it was much more focused on the first aspect which if i had a transcript i would have appealed which is the issue
that's real that's really the problem and the governor can do many things but the governor him for appropriate money by himself and that is part of the problem in this case in the government the governor has fifty unilaterally decide to spend it's not procreate so that is a problem in connection with these two years passed liability but also was intending to use the lawsuit to go faster future litigation and by the plaintiff's own admission that's what they're doing here they're using the better hurry judgment acting as
the correct to do that says no longer operating the well from my recollection of it if it's an basically for the public for the best for the public to do so i want them to stop operating with even if they
perhaps a little bit better job of moving the ball wide but let's wait and see what happens in this next little piece of play coming up from just at the back now we're going to get a pretty good look at the scrum to me yes let's see of which of the front runners a look a little bit lower and more stable in the offload yeah she should've made the move a little bit sooner maybe she's doing a great job but it's always a hard thing to decision and might when you're making that sort of a run you know what you want to be doing probably listen to the player at saudi who might be saying now now now at the exact time you need to be getting that ball and you have to have fight and that person or mike to pass at that's on you know easy to say yeah so i imagine they're going to get the ball in the hands of the detained she's been really good run of the ball and she's probably going to be looking to have one of these smiles behind her coming off think she might come back around to watch sighed again maybe last one i feel like she's so same same thing same situation she's pushing them back teen year so i think to me that your skill and offload under pressure has been pretty incredible actually you think of the complacency they've had really has been you know keeping the ball life working well for them hopefully that will come unstuck for them once they get tired of that style of play is a tough skill so she's up now she's walking off final as following this game ye and i think that's probably those opportunities there for them to be poaching netball at some point so that's we've got twenty eight minutes left no school since half time but still seem to have plenty guess and been a lot of substitutions  unfortunate looks like so it was no good the kick was no good that just went i think it went to the right wide right  wow lucky great phases wow what a period of playing really well done a hard working team i don't know as much about fitness but when you see the players of driving slower to the breakdown it tells you something about as you go into what is left you know because previously in this in high school rules the scrum is not allowed to move one way or the other more than a me space in front of them and actually draw and fix the defender that if in the can just drift across the field and we just sort of move laterally when that happens so we're really looking for one or two players was to fix a defender and create a  leg i don't see what happened  i'm sure there's a lot of water bottle concussions each year in sports her down he's determined she's driving on hot he's the teen again picking go does not quit that girl she just keeps driving here comes out the is the division one boy's state final between b c high and st john's while some tough decisions to make with regards the players of the day they know the m v p i'm not sure what we do and in miami now we don't do we i thought georgia had a it's been real see you next on jeremy
ht does not actually use provision which the court implicitly legislated into the statute it talks of products it doesn't talk of compounds were elements and then says that those products by as what the on the active ingredient in the character you're doing with the government doesn't seem to be arguing that because it's used as a colorant instead of is a vitamin it should be classified with colorants instead of vitamins you neither of you seems to think that that's just positive it doesn't look as if that impressed the court of international trade you're talking about others use of the fact the parent where somehow converted and used as a pharmaceutical we wouldn't have this problem it does seem as if what underlay customers decision was the ultimate use of the pharmaceutical appendix doesn't require anything to be used as a pharmaceutical said i fact it says something to the officer that says by whatever name it's known such as the character and the only active ingredient being very beta carotene why isn't that by any name known in the pharmaceutical  of well i'm trying to figure out why use why do you care this is just another name for beta carotene as it is listed in the with the c a s number and why by any name known it doesn't therefore fit in the is the duty free status is not challenge and it seems to me that the argument is you are presenting that support to the tissues if it doesn't depend on the use then it's duty free whatever the does describe the product which prevails under the general rules  does not fall under thirty two or four point nine two hundred thirty five you started out by quoting to a slim take in that case of course we were talking about marigold meal that had been processed to such a point that it was no longer marigold meal and that was the whole point it was no longer what it had been before it was processed this is exactly the opposite it is still beta carotene for the product that provides an r and color things that are eaten because it's an idealist or doesn't necessarily ident fact if it did identify the product it would be generic and no longer be a trademark i
mystery in the house  mr bishop of new york mr bishop of new york votes no mr  mr hare mr hare votes no ms clark mr courtney mr courtney votes no  no mr polis mr polis votes no both i mr wilson mr wilson both i mrs mcmorris rodgers mrs mcmorris rodgers both i mr price mr price votes i mr bishop of utah mr guthrie mr got three votes i mr cassidy mr mclean talk mr mclean talk boats i mr hunter mr hunter votes i mr row mr row boats i mr thompson mr thompson votes i perk a call and there's those who failed to respond the first round mr pain mr bishop of utah mr cassidy critical announce a vote mr chairman eighteen members vote aye and twenty six members vote now and the member has not agreed to the next vote will come on member number two that was postponed the bigger price amendment exempting employer health plans from the mccarthy votes no mr tierney mr tierney votes no mr percentage mr percentage votes no mr wu mr revotes no mr holt mr holt votes no mrs davis those who failed to respond mr payen mr paine votes no miss clark mr chairman eighteen members vote aye twenty eight members vote now and the members not agreed to the next vote will come on member number three the fudge titus amendment for the small business help and the clerk will call the rol mr andrews votes no mr scott mr hare votes no miss clarke mr courtney mr courtney votes no michelle porter mr price votes i mr bishop of utah mr guthrie mr got three votes i mr cassidy mr cassidy passes mr mcclintock mr mcclintock votes no mr hunter mr hunter votes no mr oh mr rowboats no mr thompson mr thompson votes mr scott mr scott votes by mr tierney mr blue mr blue passes mr polis votes mr taco
been possible water under the bridge but you have modified that section in such a way that to preserve the right to step out of contract depending on what the title search  some way it can't be personal collateral so i believe that language probably originates as some sort of way of saying that we intend to coexist
to the people who were there were consulting with and so so many times and i don't believe is supported by the record so in conclusion
understand what what group of under represented persons were being protected they had to search in vain for the perfect purpose of a lawsuit while in p q in guerrero and they didn't have to search in van to realize that even though that the obtain attorney's fees we even need insight on page nine of our brief the corporate representative of the state said testified as follows question and in response to your awareness of this lawsuit do you intend to implement any additional policies answer yes ma'am we're going back and we're looking at all of our policies regarding death of funders and we've already started implementing new policies and new training to assist in doing better communication with those done at their own corporate representative and at the end of trial the district judge even acknowledged that this was going to make them think twice about discriminating against deaf probationers and deaf persons general in the future that's in the record of the last so even the district court recognizes the public purpose and the protected class under represented individuals that are being protected in this case and what they did is th all and and he kind of assumed from the settlement discussions that that was exhaust the agenda objective of the lawsuit but if you look at the whole lawsuit as a whole you look at our prayer for relief or asking for all the significant training changes in video phone stuff that they implemented during the trial and after the trial and and then you look at we move from one area injunction and all of our discovery responses are saying whatever the jury words and damages that's what we're seeking district court disregarded quite a bit of circuit the supreme court precedent even the majority opinion and for our  because of a lack of effective communication that's a few you know right that's being violent and deaf people every day who don't get those access to those services similarly face punishments like that because they're not understanding what's going on so this is a discrimination i mean so this is the this is the significant issue and this is this isn't a you unusual case as per far because it follows the legacy of cases that conferred of benefits of a peer group of under the state to say that he wasn't actually looking for injunctive relief or a public benefit and i think that's completely wrong and the court just overlooked all the objective factors of everything else that