there is an interplay with seventy two right because it doesn't appear that the legislature would need to use that language because of seventy two we've specifically specifically held that section seven section seven to it since we've specifically held that seven to insurers as we see already agreed upon that governmental entities must not be permitted to abort their disclosure of occasion by contract in or delegating the recognize that heightened state of your directly relates there has to be solved actual connection in that document and the performance of the government function otherwise every document that got worked for has and i think looks at the document section six specifically this is about anything other than it memorializes a settlement that's it and i think that you know when we're talking about where again a statute that is a document by document again we've we already talked about how the government function as a provision of medical care to him made in the document in question is the settlement of a claim that works for negligently perform that governmental function i was that what person said the quote from persons is does not reach all records in possession of a permit contract or that relate to the government of function rather the records reached or only those that relate to performance of  reason you know and that reason could be caused that if it could be a number right but the judicial notice part is that there if there is a medical claim at least the claim was negligence here right and in this case did you get a redacted copy of the settlement really and what if any additional information would warrant i mean what would the justification for the disclosure  liability no finding it negligence what does that tell us about the quality of somebody has some pretty good evidence that it isn't so you are green that the amount of the money is evidence of negligent health care and that's what you're looking for here even though the document doesn't talk about isn't  the governmental function can you speak it just a question that at the same time the legislature specifically spoke on whether or not subtle meant agreements are  open and discoverable under florida at the same time they're in very specific language and limited that just to the public body and then at the same time a separate statute relating to be a suggestion that that was not the legislative in time they were talking about disclosure of so many agreements did not but that language into this other statute by private and they did what impression we draw from that i don't think because i think so are are we explore your strap laden from that then that governmental function of medical care to inmates is influenced by the amount of cost i mean you had the settlement amount into that and indicate that the cost for that care is now enhanced by the fact that taxpayers are paying for this element i mean i'm just trying to see how the cost  are there any other beneficial public policy interests ration here also other than c bring this document itself stand alone given what i  discussing zero there was a discussion of hearts specifically represent a black raised in the spirit of discussion in the society in our brief that asked this very concept of taxpayers and whatsoever in case listen history any policy argument that's made to the legislature now was action specifically consider the cost the taxpayer was consider