court agrees that every one of those documents contain a mature and even if this or concludes that the government should have turned over those documents earlier there is simply no basis on which to conclude that our failure to do so constituted of justice to the contrary the government the record shows here that the government worked tirelessly and try diligently to comply with all of its obligations we were reviewed and produce hundreds of thousands of pages things we overlooked to document here or we didn't appreciate potential relevance of the document there and just report's findings of materiality what is clear the false start  truck that we just that we never knew about and the other one one thousand and ten internal affairs report about an anonymous phone call complaining about desert tortoise ha and not about that record and how that record you know we're going through hundreds of thousands of documents trying to turn over every single thing that is essentially relevant and and frankly i don't think there's any way that we would anticipate that whether or inserted apparently they went on it on some sort of training mission while it were in the area but it is not true that there was no discussion about snipers elsewhere there was a there was a significant amount of information that we disclosed snipers and yet there are f b i documents and other documents in which they themselves use the word sniper and that would mean that those allegations you could not prove those yeah and i think this is and this is where has any issues here the slam dunk will be the testimony of larry would be only him whistleblower who came forward and revealed things that are unimaginable you know less on the head to people give that private individuals until they release any but there's one other fact which is very very important and not just with regard to snipers is among the information that was with help were r insurance policy of my client to have you rule and affirm because this is a matter that you should be able to see straight up now you have documentation i provided it and there is a report by larry on the record though was not admitted into evidence is absolutely no doubt and i'm dealing with what miss white said which was frankly untrue there is rowse of use here there is gross abuses one of the worst cases of abuse almost any case that comes up on appeal here and then gets reversed by this court or some kind of a trial or at that point the government will try to correct whatever mistakes that may have made and even mistakes the word appealable the government where the government will be good we could have done this was a camera with a live feed that witness was a st inclination that there was a lot he camera that information led the district court to say to the government that's it that's something that we that we would want more information i can you go back to government and find more information in governments and when camera was just not the way things work and the government had to be pushed by the court to say go back government go and find something or at least give me and i can report that there wasn't something there it was only then at the day and why they fell and close in isolated during the day and then at the additional documents about and being was in six hundred feet at night with rifles that night was being surve night that was all part of the information that was necessary for the our defense to show that this was not false messaging that when they provided this information on the internet it was accurate unease to react and the two thousand and twelve threat assessment was the government had the entire time was was health and the defense even though they specifically asked for it even though they did not get to the assessments from some other not incident from several years before so i do if you had said we want all threat assessments that were prepared after two thousand and five that the government clearly would have violated that but if you just you but if you just say we just want all the all the threat assessments i might be thinking about we have a president prepared for this time this day we'll give you all the ones who are prepared by the sheriff and the b l m of the f b i in connection with this incident not hearing and said we just learned yesterday for the st time that there were actually officers overlooking the residence on a nightly basis carrying rifles and that i mean i think that what happens is that we had provided that information they had acknowledged that information and we had it is true yes we had anticipated this defense or this theory that those officers or the surveillance camera could have been government is aftermath here or i'll sort there the question is whether this was this context and for that i think you actually have to look at what these documents were there is not a single one of these documents