doubt second when facebook evidence was probably authenticated and last whether the phone records have sufficient foundation as well as whether testimony regarding the victim's cell phone number was hearsay on the first issue there are meeting problems with the state's evidence however interested in the interest of time i'd like to just highlight the worst of the worst in terms of the contradictions that are present in the state's evidence and that begins genesis burrell who's the state's other major witness testifies that wesley is eating dinner with her at the time of the shooting on the other hand wesley testifies that he is across the street from the shooting when it occurs however as well first of all she no one else in the house sees this person in white she never tells this statement to the police officers obviously it's contradicted by genesis's testimony and it's also not corroborate his testimony even if he was standing across the street from the house again he couldn't have seen what he claimed to have seen based on the darkness and how the buildings were weighed our at that time and this shows he's wrong about the caliber of the gun he's wrong about the victim falling down next to a gas meter ysis not a reliable witness  the house right after the shooting says it's pitch dark out and anyway it he wesley testifies that this shooter jumped over a fence in the backyard which as photographs taken by the defense investigator in the daylight show you could have seen this program cross the street so his testimony is just is besides being contradicted is is just unbelievable and genesis his testimony is fight that happens a few days before obviously to get happens in the front yard of a house she's she's familiar with this neighborhood she's living in this neighborhood she could have heard about her back but no matter it did no matter what her motivation wa the park saying someone your statements to a fourteen year old girl doesn't put him at the murder scene it doesn't put him in possession of the caliber of gun that was used in this murder and  defendant walking next to her and she makes these phone calls from the park but there is no reason that any of these things were necessary there's no evidence that jackson was holed up in his house afraid to come outside and there's no evidence nothing that genesis is doing to help why would you want to come out of the house because there's some random fourteen year old girl walking by i mean and the fact is when she's walking my soul is so is the defendant with a comb over  was supervising her so that certainly is a plausible reason she didn't want to tell anybody i think that reasoning becomes a little stressed once the you find out that person is trying to same park where she left an armed man who wanted to kill someone who she just blatantly lied to and she just comes back to the same location where she left it i get it and none of it makes any sense and it's also contradicted by by the prior statements in fact a state in its belief and at least by my count points out fourteen times where genesis was contradicted enter trial testimony the state calls the testimony and it's brief quote confusing and contradictory this is the state talking about its main witness at trial so even in the light most favorable to the state this is not a reliable narrator this is you just cannot trust her testimony when so many guilty and on top of all this we have the evidence that jackson was dealing drugs from this house obviously drug dealing is a hazardous profession i'm sure this court has seen countless cases where people get shot or killed over selling the screen shot to go to the jury the judge is just the gatekeeper we had testimony by the defense by the detective up and say what will have to jury figured out the judge has a role gatekeeper to prevent evidence that is not reliable from going to the jury now in this case context is important this is social media evidence that presents unique challenges they're not presented by more traditional types of evidence obviously there's no handwriting this post is not in a specific location it there's no back and forth communication between people is in an email or text message and then you have the general and immediate posting things on the internet so in and it's for this reason that the supreme court of mississippi in the smith case so in that there first of all file names and the picture tell us next to nothing yes there was testimony that mr quinn's name nickname was walking that testimony comes only from genesis the only reason that  beyond that there is no accuracy checks on facebook we know that someone can create a fake profile with a fake picture because that is exactly what the police officer did in this case there's no other evidence about the same  by really anyone anywhere in the world so essentially i'm at it i should go take a step back so took the picture and the profile names are not enough and net that is what it is hello again in the smith many states have it buried many states witnesses knew about this murder if they knew where the victim was found dead and it is that's exactly the same situation we have again dismiss invader in those cases the courts hel this unless we take into account the circumstances of everything that happened and discussed a lot of it in your first argument but again i guess the question is why  evidence to say to get it before the jury and here that's just that there's not that it does really two questions who wrote this post and what does it mean and it's sort of the state has sort of already have the people the state of illinois i would first like the court to direct the court back to our brief to the standard review and i'm not going to go over it i know girl and my door is greatly reduce the victim's girlfriend because both of them had been present the day before with this all to keep should have taken place and another reason to say what to say that wasn't just some alter cation was affected both of them testified that they saw the defendant get it all to patient with the knife and both of them to the defendant threaten the victim that he was going to kill him on genesis also  a police officer search he searched by using the name of renter not a not uncommon name but probably not in the top ten common names that are given to them and tying in with the fact that lucky guy's nickname was also in there and we know that there was his nickname the girls testified to that so only thing they knew this man about the defendant there was a picture police officer said the picture was sufficient for him it was a few people and and here it is yes then why didn't people who wanted to frame the defendant because they were men him there's no evidence of that anywhere there's no there's no testimony i mean the only people who were at that house sure we have the next door neighbors who suspect he was drunk heard the nosey next door neighbors but there's no proof that anybody could have been the owner of those drugs that were found at the place in the doesn't know that his computer or whatever it is texting her on was linked to his wife's i pad who was reading these messages so again how how the court is going to look at what it takes to these telephone calls were going on at decoratively time the sufficient to back up that the computer generated records were ok if you're saying it's an insufficient foundation that you can't relate it back to then and then it can't be related back to to the defendant and in that this was information before the jury they could they were there looking at it only so it's not being emitted through the truth of the matter of service because it never does kind of the truth of the matter is certain what happens is the killer shows what the police officer did in his investigation he took those phone numbers and he went to find deficiencies are magnified a billion fold when we don't have yet to address instead of tying it to one specific house it's anyone in the world and doesn't book as you point out the name the name doesn't mean him in person so she e mailed a friend and said we're going to meet at this location and she went to the allegation and there was the defendant that's corroboration nothing like that in this case that down and deals in is a complete higher level of