before the court revealed that there were problems from the very first day and the times that the put the appellants took the r v out for use they had problems in total are you had twenty warranty on during the first two trips of advising the authorized dealer of the problems that they were having within the five days and it wasn't until after those two times that they reached out to r on continue to be aware of the problems and were on notice through multiple calls and then two separate letters one by mr matthews before he retained counsel and one testimony before the court was the opinions of mr bailey and not no evidence before the court of any opposing opinions of any other experts  case i think but even if we take out the two first two repairs i think we've presented enough evidence to go to a jury on the issue of whether a reasonable number of repair attempts or a reasonable kenworth of indianapolis and both anderson say that they don't get around an unlimited amount of time to repaired the facts and we have expert testimony saying that some of the items were not repaired within a we're going to give you a good well warranty for another year and it says to be administered under the same guidelines as the monitor are the l l c warranty a couple questions about that but my first question is was that is it your position that this goodwill warranty that was given in may of two thousand and fifteen was an extension of the limited warranty that was already in place that they had granted it's my understanding that in both instances the rev rep said we're extending your warranty but then in each instance they wrote a letter saying it's not an extension of the warranty it's just goodwill under the term so i may have twenty six mr matthews refilled the water tank and then a couple well about two months later he noticed the countenance were like pulling up parts and he took a level and noticed the floor was leaning up but it wasn't and i think the reason for that is because this r v weighs more than the than the pound limitation in the lemon law weighs more than ten thousand pounds so the lemon law doesn't apply but is it fair for us  as a legal matter considering the facts here what is a reasonable opportunity to repair how many times is reasonable the lemon law put status for is that is that an appropriate consideration just as an informative reference or is it not i don't think that it is i think that first of all under indiana law under the holding in anderson i think that opportunity to cure j i think it's also important to note that it was also emphasized that the wait for two months was too long the matthews alone had to wait for two months to even get that are be in the shop they were discussing the repairs in march rather didn't even get it in until they picked it up on may first and it was then for fifty six days after that additionally in anderson i believe that  the facts in this case and reach a conclusion on what they think is reasonable also we are the only party that had expert testimony i mean issue and that was unopposed at least at the summary judgment so the issue i believe it becomes an issue of we don't even necessarily need to get to whether or not it's a design defect because that issue was not presented for a pair during the warranty period if it had then are you made and do i really like to stress the point that in this case it comes down to an issue of three specific defects that are at issue and those issues are b b b player the t v and the air conditioner nothing else states that everything is repaired and we don't hear from him again establishes that he did have some issues with the r v but he never once presented the r v for repair fault like immediately following that he called the local dealership that he had purchased the r v from and having your shoes mr matthews apparently matthews testimony so once he notified grant that there was no local dealership they were willing to work with him and they were willing to say all right since there is no dealership within your area why don't you go ahead and bring it to me for a dealership of your choice going to be he simply provided the right while bringing it into the dealership of my choice on there is a question about winterizing if you fill the tanks and money in virginia and you notice the issues with the water tank in july so don't think that that was a result of the water tank freezing additionally i think it's really important we didn't get to