hundred would be maintenance sixteen thousand five hundred would be child support it's clear from his testimony in that the parts of a two day hearing that that number was forty five percent and that that's what he believed he  was that he would continuously as long as he had five children he would be paying forty five percent of his net month playing in some combination of maintenance and child support at that time on a video entered into the agreement  made every payment every cent that was owed coming came down to on a monthly basis in spain thirteen hundred seventy five dollars and chiles or thirty two hundred eight hours of maintenance a month or forty six hundred dollars a month to about looking to get a fifty five thousand dollars a year court ordered obligation for maintenance in child support and he may or may not have a job he's contacted by an arizona company and describes it as a sister company and the president of that company makes it clear to him this is not respond not rebutted by any testimony whatsoever the case that he didn't position he's been offered in arizona and interstate hydraulics is virtually the seven and till the very hearing in may of two thousand and ten the question is did he intentionally willfully and consummation slate refused to pay forty seven thousand dollars he had paid a substantial amount of his maintenance he couldn't pay all that fit to trial for the even twenty five percent reduction on the motion to reduce which is also part of our case judge judges gave into five  keeper he's saying i don't believe are you still believe his client does he have the power to do that i suspect and does have the power to do that if i do i think it factors into whether even uses discretion there is no other evidence to offset  to anything yet in his career and there is not any evidence in the record ridge as to what his obligations were on that day there is no testimony in the record as to what he did with the eleven he's paying thirty five hundred dollars a month anyway the judge in his made and in is child support obligation this is not a deadbeat dad case i bet plenty of those would all have one of those this is not one of those cases he's paying thirty five hundred dollars a month to child support means he has terrific allegations he has new marriage out in arizona he had katie as a stepson who's a handicap that's all part of the record evidence and the in that case and thank you he estimated or over estimated was his ink it would continue to be just as mr white did and their case it didn't turn out that way nobody has a crystal ball bu here in this case has to do with choices that were made and choices that were made by peter many of those choices were made unilaterally including his leaving his job  r and that is his own testimony he gave some testimony american army forecasts were the geneseo area none of that was supported by anything other than his own testimony and i think it is important to two years after he left his job that petition was never her and until last year and i think that perhaps his choice not to purchase an airline ticket  the well i think that's true and i'm not arguing that he was intentionally i don't think that's the standard i think part of it is good to say it you know in the traditional sense but i think good faith also passed a component of am i making decisions in the best interest of those six people who are depending on me and i don't think he did in that regard and again i go back to judge daniels finding in that regard i also want to point out to something that just heard talked about an out mr and if i had asked to you all to look at the wills case and i think the wills case is an important case but there is a difference between the wills case and what's going on here again will that what you're saying but i think again we are at one level away from  don't know any case that says that i don't think it is the law and i believe that if there is ever a case for the end billeted day other then some person who is completely bankrupt and doesn't have a dime this is it the other end of the spectrum this guy has no ability to pay he's paying a huge percentage of his net not letting him for four years the error is fifty region that is what he says and but i believe your honor that you can analyze this case fairly and do justice to these parts and determine the price of justice tangles decision if you say that peter man isn't content to go or because our one day out of fifteen hundred days he asked for eleven thousand dollars and he concluded on that day under the strict financial stress that he's under for this four year period to do something else obviously paid bills that record is replete with all his financial records this task should be in bankruptcy and instead is struggling with these it like the