even if you did not reply saying no we want the automatic stay period it is saying even if all of that is true not the situation of financial need the money was limited said to the parties this is around thanksgiving i believe that we need to get this done quickly debtors council said we will be prepared to close immediately this is all in our briefs  there after the bankruptcy court asked the parties to submit proposed orders with respect to the sale in the debtor's proposed order the waiver of the period was was set forth there was also in the original proposed order back in september which was filed in the original sale motion then both parties were provided an opportunity to submit their proposed orders mission did not include any request for a period of time the following  event was filed on december fifteenth because the parties hadn't dissipated or rather quick sale order and two weeks later that still had not been won so on december fifteenth the debtors filed a notice with the court saying if we don't have sale ordered by december eighteenth we're going to need to come back and revisit the cash collateral issue in the lending issue which would then also affect the sale price and perhaps other events then the sale order is entered on december eighteenth at which point the parties were prepared to close and at that point it already been in the preparations for closing for over three weeks at that point so the suggestion that a sophisticated bankruptcy attorney was not aware that a closing would be be ready to go at that point it's just nonsense and i also would point to you that at the reply to our motion to dismiss that was filed in this court which is which is pending i believe they being quoted as saying from colliers which talks about the six thousand and four h weaver and at the bottom of that it says unless the party you know the waiver can't be done unless there are waivers subject to a party coming to them and informing the court that they were going to seek a stay interestingly enough when the  the record with respect to an undisclosed secret deal because there was none the parties did not have any deal the bidding that was done at the sale process was done in accordance with mission structure you can look at the brief the briefs that were filed here adopted the mission structure which left the inventory behind that happened on the fly at the auction there was no secret deal about how the inventory was going to be dealt with at a later date now the examiner an independent examiner in the court in the case filed a report saying i support that the winner of the auctions probably going to buy it to sit around cost and that's what actually occurred they did buy it at cost the sale order was approved by the same exact judge that found that we were good fit purchasers and that order was never appealed by mission who examiner as well found that we were a good faith purchaser i don't think it would have impacted and i think it's quite a stretch to suggest which of these people to change the pinion based upon that especially since he approved the sale and mission was granted an opportunity to object in fact i believe the debtor even offered mission the inventory they wanted to purchase it may decline occurred from from there until now we're talking twenty one months after a business having been run i mean i don't know that they're there to be much other than the fact that twenty one months have passed and they're asking for this court independent third party will suit liabilities part of a transaction there's the absolute bankruptcy justification for doing so on someone's personal going concern would like to preserve the value that going to try to make sure they get the benefit of the bargain  is just pours cash into the estate first and then sale the bankruptcy estate is left with a bunch of obligations and some cash and that will then be parsed out based on the priority you buys off the ones that they want to favor and essentially produces no cash then you get a different result the pay out and that alters the first scenario as i understand it that's someone had to treat critters that have no obligation to continue to perform going forward to see thing with assumption of rejection of contracts a buyer can pick and choose the contracts it wants the tape there's a reason for it so your example if this were a factory and is not a situation where there is no cash left in the state and there were it is completely we will have to get through the parent process and will have to meet up and at that time we had but the debtor demonstrated a good was a good faith legitimate reasonable business justification for wanting to have a sale just some consolation acknowledged that the transaction being presented to him was and was