MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
well i guess we've lost them yes that's what most of our current think some imagine we have a charm line most sheriffs are bird shot but there's a bullet somewhere with our name on it waiting for us well and you're going to forget all party and his pack what are you talking about that bullet i've stopped might a got to the game it worth it go to some new country start all over again and go straight this time around that the heart is i think we can get out through that end of the canyon course if i'm not good enough to associate with your daughter that's  that's pretty good country around here could be good if you're talkin to the wrong man blanco i'm lookin for a regular gal you'd be day don't worry just don't you do any talking and i w that i might have your back up with somebody else where i gotta hide john might be need five gone and made all preparations and i'm not going to disappoint my friends judy i don't need you you've said enough blanco oh yeah oh now you listen to me either you comment about me or i'm going to tell learning just who you really are don't you like it it isn't that we are so used to being on the move it's kind of hard to sit stay in one place very long i  before blanco starts talking forget it ok i appreciate your want to take a job of my hand but after all that's my job ok told you there i don't know but it sounded very much like the blanco kids the kid would do something like that just to get even with the boys  but i keep my eye on them just the same cookie told me you were did i told him to tell you that was the only way i could get you to leave well well i'm going to straight like you wanted me i got a regular job that blanco kid i saw him down town who did well here is where we have a showdown look well i don't take care of them horse this is our big chance cowboys of the landing range are out looking for the wolves here's where we make our clean up and get out of the country i didn't mean to come back cooking i'm afraid i've spoiled jim chances by coming into this territory i never suspected he was in these parts i was only trailing the blanco a mighty grateful to you for not turning me over to the her before i go there is one thing you must believe i didn't come here is a spy wrestler i only wanted a chance to begin over again what's the matter with you judy you better not do so strangely right you seem to have something on your mind with nothing all right let's go have breakfast good morning lanny take it easy i came after something in that state a rol
the old reactor in your it is absolutely vital that we act to bring a robust domestic supply of these critical medical isotopes on line as soon as possible in order to production act of two thousand and nine the bill will provide the department of energy new authority and resources to assist the private sector in establishing as rapidly as possible a robust medical isotopes production
both before and after our planned consolidation and in two thousand and fourteen and to support the justice system and citizens on mine each reporting system and these all functions have been done in and basically with the savings from mr morris retirement those on the spend salary that were already programmed into the budget we can support these changes and traditionally when you look at how these changes flowed into the upcoming budget year by positioning the city this way this staffing structure we're actually going to spend about forty thousand dollars less than the city decided to just just one of the question i know a lot of the few that was supporting clinton with which you foresee this disease into the evils you in the support south that that would be hired with these dollars
recently and so do we see that the way to determine whether the plane was dismissed versus allegations being dismissed would be to determine whether you asked for relief under a third certain he you remember these do not exist
number seventeen six two three eight william thomas jr versus john true work at all argument not to exceed ten minutes for appellant ten minutes properly and five minutes for each arguing and make mrs campbell remain perceived to be
i have no car
of the grand jury
bad for this project calls for a contributor to the intoxication each and every one of those complaints alleges that they do is they say cases that have nothing to do with claims pieces are insurance coverage cases they have nothing to do with this case each and every run of these underwriting cases yes that because of the cause you're trying to point to something that's really the same thing and you have something with different but that's an exception to the
the judge and on the police unfortunately i put a footnote in my brief regarding a case that was before the supreme court and use appeal and it was decided that was the warren county so water conservation just reverses walters which was those are both purely legal errors and those be applied to all the review similarly the court addressed whether or not there needed to be a delusions or components whether or not there needed to be a others are not as i'm sure and i'm wondering how you get to a judgment on the pleadings based on comparing taking this december fourth document as an answer looking at you evidence and diligence that anything he's brought up here why could it have been raised in response to the him by the way i suppose if the it was a proper thr opposite of one i will not exactly because then the other side said i think you're i think you're evil so pay right and that's dedicated he said no i'm not so i'm not good and they said ok here here's your was which she says in combination with that there is no provision for repayment schedule i mean there's no question that you know we're got a lot of small procedural issues here because we have a pro se point
and no no
settle for three thousand dollars in other words you want to increase the ante from one thousand five hundred to three thousand dollars and what he said was i want to do this settlement drafting get me the documents immediately so i can get paid i mistake and what retirement benefits now but i don't really know the answer to that question here i mean he's no longer employed with my client i mean he doesn't work for why he does that  settlement i think what's most important and in my mind very compelling is that to administrative law judges have had an opportunity to hear testimony and both found that the three thousand dollars settlement was reasonable on the one i could always talk to my crime clients ok thank you thank you
the fact that it was a death investigation before it was a homicide investigation the police were using our eggs you know just to help them investigate how this woman that he had first
you know a mystique about the case and something was going on the next thing you know there's this idea that a freudian did something norm it will come from the fact that she was purchasing this property with her brother she had no one who are interested she ends up with more than ten events that happened here the long period of time that we're talking about but that occur i think that that whole case is even a horrible call than this one has because there was no knowledge that was passed like it was proven here regarding this problem th matters why because here the fact that he resigned his the trustees who took away the power that resignation trustee took him from the ability to transfer the property trust but yes you're right his mr massey was an issue and i think that's what speaks to the lack of good faith in what the court found after hearing from testimony from david and many people that we had so yes that is a clo
which is a premier attorney search firm at the time of the force and this is shriver gate represented that she had no income credit for the year two thousand and eleven year of their st she would not be receiving any further just any was a step short brown from the serial at the time of the judgment up to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars for that particular year as well as the fact that in the it taking it that left here as well as three dollars or so foreign to her she averaged two
under two six one one yes and we're we're going to review this to know so really doesn't matter what the trial judge determines here are you saying there's a question of fact on this record that his reckless conduct didn't in some way even if you say rather minute later that the act of leaving her all day in the basement and then actually not telling the countryside that he had done it and many like went to her house and didn't tell her mother about the effects of the one you think reheat and apparently whatever that there's itself it says that there's covered autos ok out and there's a description of the various autos that are covered and you in los you have didn't contribute to the injuries that's right so if we take this pace that all the insurance policy and we take the philadelphia policy which we know is insurance is there any question of fact what we file but that's challenge the status she said was self insurance so the trial judge basically said this was self insurance under you have to work in the other cases out of the second district that's what she said that that there was really not a hundred shares here and it was health insurance and result the money that he would  we get this all liability coverage to countryside for any claims of bodily injury death or property damage and raising directly out of the provision of transportation services provided with peace vehicles is described in this agreement within the scope of cas the self insured retention and up to the limit labeling limits of such excess insurance that pace a purchase but ok so that is what exactly were they provide they provide coverage for something like this wouldn't happen again he didn't install little sirens or whatever they actually put in the place that think the next day that countryside boy would be a back out to the siegel of cambridge that clearly said that but i don't think anybody would dispute was reckless so why don't you tell us why it doesn't matter that there were numerous allegations of negligence against was limited only to the stand that they were intended or expected from the standpoint of there was no reckless absolutely in the field of absolutely it's a contribution claim first of all it has to be to insurance companies and i don't think you can say paces away insurance company pay student provide an insurance policy and finally even if you treat it as an position you know that's what i mean your position is clear today you're not saying that there wasn't coverage for my under certain circumstances what you're saying is that the average did not  that much stronger because let go tastes ensure the same rest but this is space is self insurance it is public funds so i think there's a very different situation i think anytime you've got a situation where
six twenty two is intended to prove the rule of law cases getting filed without when you look at the facts when you look at the facts in this case the plaintiff always had u but the report exist the court may receive evidence with respect to whether the parties original delinquency was caused by mistake inadvertent returning to class it doesn't have to go any farther i mean this is not a word the court is saying wasn't good cause he's saying i'm not i'm saying that i don't think there's an objective reason as in that got lost in the mail or something he's saying i think it wasn't here because somebody forgot it just didn't happen i'm not saying and i'm saying that i don't think that's good cause to say that that's not an objective outside reason outside of your firm i'm fighting that something happened in your firm and i don't but he does that can be enough i mean i think vision point says you know if somebody in your office screwed up that can be enough judge judge panel never says there is good cause judge panel sense can you supporting record i don't think there is an objective reason why it wasn't fall and so i read that as saying i don't i mean objective reason establishing the cause but at a minimum he never says there is because he never makes a
history what the record was what the court considered it in the sense that was most you don't just look at an isolated town right in their native unless the reliance was so insignificant that the nothing to a greater seconds i don't know how you can find it out o aggravation and very often we get three some of the say well they didn't say this or they didn't talk about this therefore the sentence should be reduced because the court didn't consider this factor the factor in the response from us all he says and i can remember of up and down the plot for years and years you've been caught ever kind of break even sent the boot camp you've been in since is reduced to felonies to misdemeanors you've been given low sentence is nothing has worked you come in here in the
green the trial the judge judge who was the trial of fact and i think that's very important ira the size that at least i think that's very important to work through to remember when deciding this case so in that particular case the judge was falling within his rights fully within his constitutional authority to determine whether the five those actions were reasonable and whether they were reasonable within the parental discipline defense but when there's a jury trial reasonable and if they did for some reason then i think that's great but if they can't get their it that's the jury's call but if that if it happened i believe what he's saying there is if they found it to be reasonable there is no rational person in my view they could say that that's part of parental discipline if that happened the jury finds that he's been proved beyond to be under reasonable doubt again i think it would be irrational conclusion and it didn't really make any difference evidence of what evidence of other sorts of punishment that he had not worked hear the passage that i read to history monday although there is one sentence that says that if my view you could not see that that's part of parental discipline what he uses to judge  several times reasonable force is part of a reasonable discipline of the child he uses then again to the conclusion reasonable discipline of the child reasonable force it sounds like the judge each other crimes in evidence related to the mother of this child how how does that relate to actions toward the child there  physical contact for mr hoskins relate to his physical contact with the minor part of the domestic battery statutes knowingly this happened within a year this happened against brett's miche schmidt's who was the mother of the child  it does he is anger toward mother then translate toward anger toward the child if they have the issue it would translate to that this was something this was propensity that this this had happened before  right or wrong he's saying that i was attempting to could troll this child who is hard to control i might is a jury member i might go find it reasonable but why wasn't the jury entitle to i mean i don't know that if you took somebody that you have to pass out but anyway i mean there is evidence that good grief for a short period of time when the act itself i would say i would also say there is no evidence that this was because he was not entitled to therefore he couldn't do that that's the real reason that it's one of the reasons i would say that's the only reason so a f can beat up his sister i think this is sister or no case of his  jury was entitle to decide and here he's asking this court i think in a sense to to make a person a rule regarding the fashion in this particular case on the air and say that because of the facts in this
first place he didn't have enough time to prepare and had to frequently ask questions and take breaks to talk with stand counsel this forcing him to give a trial under the circumstances without proper consideration of discontinuous request of matter but there was that to be expected this is the date of trial also the court knew the history of the defendant the time was first set on january twenty fourth and it wasn't till january twenty first three days before that on the final pretrial form wasn't paying enough attention but the attorney represented that he had met with his client six to eight times the record supports that and that he was totally up to date on things and was prepared to try this case  counsel so he knew for those six weeks that he might not be getting in this might not be successful then he comes in with no backup plan and knowing that the trial is trying to his in way and when he said five days to present the motion so big no specters i think yes there were a number of witnesses there was no scientific evidence and it is this for the most part right there because they also had to face a similar you know a crime perpetrated by the defendant they were there to provide for really was a denial of this right that he had that resulted in prejudice and that's what we're looking for if there is some type of due process violation there's absolutely no statement of any type of still and that's the basis upon which we say again our facts contradict their legal theory that is that in this case there is no magic words the court did not have to and this seems to be a defense argument that the court had to say that it was making a determination that it was necessary to protect the public from further criminal conduct by a defendant and then elaborate  because the judge talked about how the defendant perpetrated a kind way and how the circumstances were likely to recur those were his words and that in fact this defendant had a long significant criminal history those are all the facts which go to the basis and the the that was part of what this court decided on direct appeal and like i say even if you know giving the defended all of those things since the procedural defaults in which we believe
is no physical evidence against the defendant it's important for the defense to be able to present this type of expert testimony it's also important the court room in the old it where certain factors apply now interest fact apply in the case in a bar for example a situation where the witness is in fact the victim of a crime as opposed to just an officer of or on the street by case the removal witness is under that in this particular case when you look at the fatality of the circumstances the trial judge exercise discretion didn't want to take the stuff to trial the defendant had the alibi witnesses on that t we have in this case is we have
two are being committed today on the greed namely appeal number zero five deaths thirty to sixty nine men or as versus office of personnel management and appeal number zero five thirty three thirty one solar versus apartment  understand the heart of your case could be see that the letters in this case rather than being categorized as typical of what can fairly be called these and desist letter actually are more in the nature of maybe it was badly written maybe it maybe it could have said more or said it more strongly but that doesn't seem to be the point it seems like they did think in is between an offer of they will as was the case in three d system versus  create a binding contract then it is in the category of promotional sale of documents not in the player isn't that the key distinction in the case law i don't believe that you're on because you can have to change without having an offer of a really be judging that opposing counsel has conceded that his client was acting in bad faith when transmitting the letter that hardly seems to be the case if that was his position he wouldn't be defending the district identified the licensed product not only describing the product but also attacking these promotional materials or descriptive bat who doesn't manufacture the product where that person said he's in the thing because i think you're infringing and by the way buy a license from us so you can buy the product without question in the forum then those letters can be read as a poem of solicitation some containing promotional materials descriptions of the product in question and i mean like prices quantities of ailill and delivery com grains and so forth then where is the line is it your position that only if it's an acceptable offer under contract law to the promotional material tip the is a conditional reference depending on what the value of the patmore would be yeah that makes it a big step i would think a labor being offered to sell the product or the elicitation for the drug chain
that was only after they they they stopped the vehicle looked inside and found somebody had been shot they call the vehicle after the seizure not before it's the police officer gave his reason for the stop judge greenway as being correct but there's there's nothing that prohibits somebody from laying down in the backseat of a car there's nothing to suggest that there's anything wrong with that there's no indication that he was coming from an area where the gunshots were even fired and  if you just look at it from those two facts but if you considered a fact that the officers knew that that roadway had no exit have said wow since this vehicle is not silver i have to let it go all there so there's a it was unclear to me from the record is one how many buildings there were to start with mr henson is said twice that there were three buildings i thought that the three buildings that were being referred to were all buildings on the thomas property
as actually said that doesn't matter the reason people don't repeat the law is because they presume it is there in the time necessary for peace in the contract and soon have the situation where we have and i think it about the commencement of his p t o pay or arena in one nine hundred ninety eight with this company community care network which is not hard to see he admitted in his deposition he was never guaranteed a minimum number of patients were an increase in revenues and he accepted my finest painting of a medical bill even though my client paid him on a sixty two dollars bill fourteen dollars less than the bill and did not challenge th provider say it is section six one of that agreement congress you represented that it was the legal of the life of the software and the license there was an arbitration clause in that contract injury appeared to be something that was work related to do a bit of due diligence and then using this electronic bridge again this is the woman who will sees how this was actually done in reality not in in fact you did they use they filed this motion and stated this to the following one contest perhaps that they presented to the chords or their motion and those facts included as i say in writing group the following which is that employers contracts they produce witnesses there are hundreds of pages testimony in the eight years that this case pending before the surge before there has been no evidence presented that challenges the lawsuits that were brought on the scene theory it's our position that the way case brought clarity to an issue that was was open the time and for consistency sake and for all the other cases that are ending  clearly not inflated worker's comp it clearly did not promise dr dean is any any guarantee channeling or direction patients in both our case any way both cases were initially either company required to direct or channel patients to these doctors they were they were in both agreements they were encouraged to encourage players to seek providers in the contract with the first house and had a contract with the presence or company and again apparently there was first help and i don't think purchased the assets or what sort of corporate structure