simply a a bank is is very important are arguments of the trustee of that frost was us back but there it was simply the nominal trustee only for the purpose of forming a trust and the trust was formed under the laws of the state of new york this was a two thousand and seven mortgage backed securities mortgage backed security and the that the defeat of the trust itself was september first of two thousand and seven and the trust closed by its own terms on october tenth of two thousand and seven and under the laws of the state in new york the trust laws and also the laws  notice that we intend to accelerate the death which means that you call the debt due at the same time and we're going to send you a letter they have those and nine in a ballpark way like six components of that letter but if we simply the letter has to list all of those components and if it doesn't have all of those components then it doesn't come off with the notice so you can't just give a notice it says this is a lot of intent or photos or a notice  law if if there is a sworn affidavit it's guile and there is no counter affidavit to refute that then the facts contained in the affidavit must be construed to be true so it was never disputed that my client never reason that i bring this up is that we go  september of two thousand knowing and the trust goes to his earlier in october of two thousand and seven so even this purported assignment was defective because it wasn't done more good was not property of the says that it a conveyance into a trust that doesn't comply is brewing but they said then it stands since this trust has a trustee as every trust has to do then if the trustee did filed in the trial work however what is before this court today is the denial of a two fourteen on one condition of a case that was filed three months after order approving sale was entered in foreclosure and approximately one month after six rejected an argument that the failure to meet improve standing deprive the core of subject matter jurisdiction and thus rendered the foreclosure judgment void so given that and revisited the people events and matter and addressed some of the confusion that was created by the supreme court decision in that case and clarified that vincent refers represents only a specific  know one titian's wherein purely legal issues are presented to a claim challenging a final judgment were sworn in as for the reasons previously discussed we're not dealing with their point judgement here so under more correct and i'd like to respond to that because the only rationale that the trucker gave for denying the fourteen zero one motion is his erroneous interpretation of the statute they can can't file for two no one motion under the statute if it's called less them less than thirty days the judgment is a thirteen no one motion after that it's a fourteen no one motion and you have up to two years after the final judgment to follow fourteen no one motion for the purpose of brief by the plaintiff if they wanted to court to take judicial notice of recorded documents and for the purposes of this fifty no known motion that document was never it's not in the record it was never it that  heard the argument you are the plaintiff could never presented their argument at the trial and had never provided to the board this exhibit yet doesn't come into play till after the case had was already been proven we've never seen a document before