proper venue rockwell to complain so that ending there in your in your complaint rather in your appeal you refer only to the federal not california law more in your honor may have please the court and counsel on a case were filed this case in arbitration then urged the arbitration panel of three to hear its extra contractual fraud in the inducement an illusory contract claims urged the panel that had jurisdiction over those claims then tried those claims both its contract claims and its extra contractual claims of its fraud and its illusory contract claims churro final judgment and chance disappointed with the result that a achieved it now wants a nd bite at the apple in fact it says the panel invoked jurisdiction where it none only after qwest was disappointed that the panel ruled that the contract it is issue product support agreement was not a requirements it's too late as a matter of law what this panel was focused on during the opening argument it's too late because those claims have been tried to fin judgment already and then reduced to a judgment confirming the award under the language of the p s a that's it the contracted issue under the language the arbitration clause it issued that's it in addition when you turn to the merits of the case there is no manifest distrait there's no absolutely no proof of manifest disregard for the law nor is there any sort of monster right off the bat this is different than monster energy so right off the bat there was a disclosure by the share of the panel that his firm was disclosed was my firm was not my office but my firm was at verse two a company that united technology used to own way back in  learned he was opposite a partner of mine you know so there's this other panelists well i did we didn't just arbitrate he was also he's also a practicing lawyer former i favor of anyone they would work in favor of quaffs here and and as your honor points out there was no objection that was made by class just like there was no objection to n two of the f a a literally applies in this case you've got an iowa company you've got a challenge for your company they're shipping products back and arbitration clause is different than the wal mart arbitration clause they are the wal mart arbitration clause foreclosed any judicial review of the arbitrator's decision case very similar to this case exactly like this case including the language of the arbitration provision in that issue and the language of this arbitration provision here before this court maybe entered in any court ok so now you have a different from the wal mart decision and it puts it squarely within the may tech decision and it says that once you have again we don't even get to the merits in this case we don't get to the merits in this case race you do kata grounds we don't get to the merits on the case  limitations grounds we the court need not even reach the merits but if the court decided to reach the merits the standard of review is so dumb parental under the f the panel has there has to be a demonstration that the panel knew the law but then ignore the law and finally the panel has under the f a a very wide discretion to admit exclude evidence as it deems that and i'm happy to talk about the all of the issues but i  partial judgement in favor of rival collins on a requirements contract that's the rd time and then qwest filed yet a no other reconsideration motion on that same issue and every time all four times the panels that it was base unit in both the summary judgment motion and at the trial on evidence submitted by the parties including evidence from own witnesses including expert witnesses that there was no requirements for and secondly it is partial win lord in favor of rockwell collins it has sections of the final ward that are entitled there was no fraud in the inducement here again another title there was recontract here so it squarely looked at those issues considered them consider the evidence submitted at trial and then ruled in favor of rock as a witness at the trial in this case and that's just a misrepresentation of the record here in fact rockwell collins filed lawyer and witness something that is that we all know as practitioners something that we learn in law school but is also found in a b a rule three dollars in the iowa arbitration arch recently deferential to the arbitrators had to be manifest disregard the law each of the members of the panel has read your brief we know your contentions and