thank you your honor i would like to reserve ten minutes or rebuttal and i plan to focus on the analysis of the goil fifth amendment issue and submit on the briefest video argument about the court would be of key importance and i think that if i prevail on convincing you that the court did make it there it would be very difficult for the government to show that was not just show that that was hard entrapment argument we're talking about and the court consider it the failure of my client to tell about these things in the earlier points in time  way of then peachey his credibility we have the crime of arrest at which time and my client didn't say anything about either of these two things and the government has it established that entrapment argument was raised after the first sentence he and prior counsel at that time argued the facts of the sentencing and craftsman but he challenged it as a argument for a since the entrapment argument wasn't brought up at the first sentence but wasn't brought out at the time of arrest this must be deemed to be a focus on the defendant's fail so much as i think it's called a licensing argument where at the time of the first sentencing and at the time actually as we're just getting ready to go to trial the defendant claimed i was told that by the confidential source that he's working for the police i have to live adult to the police in the first the liver now i'm working for them and if i cooperate with them i'll get off the hook that was the argument that he made getting ready for a first trial the government covered that issue with defense counsel the defendant decided to plead guilty guilty in front of judge tanner and judge tanner asked who specifically in that guilty plea did anybody make you do this and he said not under oath so i think that was all that issue at that point in time for judge sanders purposes i can't frankly remember and that's the idea that the confidential source said i've got you on this first deal on that if you don't make another transaction cooperate with us you're going to be that by my cooperate in the police would end up great arresting the girl and then i'd be off the hook and i was really surprised that they arrested me and took me away like that now on the issue again of the silence i that would be at  from post traumatic stress disorder and i think what they're really doing there is explaining again to the judge late and this is why it took him so long that we in the south he's so deathly afraid of presently gail he was too afraid to bring it up earlier and then the defendant himself during the hearing this is the one who really perhaps if i had talk to you right when i was arrested i would have been able to give you better information but i never got that chance that's what really opened the door to this whole topic at the sentencing hearing that a friend of hers had out i believed it was true so i contested that with him at l this guy i don't believe his defense i think he operates at a much higher level intellectually than his i two would reflect and i think that's one of the issues we raised was ok perhaps he is retarded perhaps he has a low i q but that isn't the detail what he's thinking and why he's doing what he's doing so i think at that point you can realize that look the time like has something to do with it but only in the sense that i don't believe the defendant's excuse about why it took him so long to bring this  constitute invitation or a waiver of the point that there's a fifth amendment right to remain silent and that it's improper for a quirky to adverse inferences from silence there's no dispute between