a would not consider her state license for post traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder as i'm going to civilities resulting from persecution on account of protected grounds hundred ninety eight at that time he was working for security which who is an immigration refugee their authority it's a government opposition in ethiopia she had worked there for eighteen years only june she was fired from her job because parents were both born in eritrea she was about the first person fired from their government job in and who have any adverse credibility finding that this is your testimony and we take  hospital the normal procedure was for the hospital to release the after the report the next day they would not take the body if you take over to see the police the police would not investigate either they told her to get away she came by three times and information to eritrea and she was taken to a police station for one day and then to a holding center which was holding women and children for deportation to eritrea now russia her child was there at that time suppose we agree with you that what you describe constitutes fast persecution contrary to what the immigration judge got what do we what do we do then tell us title to if you started off by saying you want submitted to death indicates that persecution is still going on in ethiopia on account of a person's one for our family members birth and for parents birth and eritrea and this was a started by the seven the country conditions have already been considered by the i j a and so therefore we don't he has he's got already done this so there's not any reason for that and if the court does not want to look at this thanklessness issue but look at just to eritrea she was put in with three hundred four hundred ladies and children and there were no bathroom facilities because of the same thing that happened no this is part i believe of this attack on the dignity of a person when the archive basket of their citizenship is what prop this is dollars emphasizes that says that making a person's fitness is a cruel and unusual punishment and she said the i j a said that  she had said that she was not treated poorly but she never said that she described it as a place that boggles the mind and she said that the deliberate separation of her from sound was something that she she could not believe immigration judge looked at the fact whether or not she was in fact was she could be considered eritrean he looked at her own expert testimony her testimony and the documents that she presented her own expert testimony they arrested her because she was eritrean the court found that she was not eritrean after looking at you know the substantial evidence presented in this case but even if you assume that she was eritrean for this argument you would have to also look at whether or not the jailing of her was persecution and persecution you know is an extreme concept it's a difficult thing to prove and you would look at the whole facts of what happened looking at the facts of what happened when she was jailed yes she was taken out of her house and through the list of factors that her expert said would identify one as eritrean additionally she did testify that her mother remained in ethiopia and time she died which was in late december two thousand mother as eritrea because her mother was able to remain in the country there's no testimony to indicate that the mother was harmed at any time when she was in that country well does that mean though that it does that mean this person has no claim and also was there any urge dreams living be i'm not saying that but i am saying that you know it is some indicator of ethnicity claim that she's making that the government view her as ethiopian rather than eritrea you know i have to say i find it to her are not bad enough not of the basis for discrimination isn't there perhaps that the correct reading of the immigration judge is finding him but even if you look at that even if she was  suffered some harm because she is eritrean he doesn't arrive at the conclusion based on the whole evidence on the record as a whole that this was persecution he does look at the channeling at the time that she was prosecuted and conclude from that that while she was jailed and was separated from her son while that was i guess he characterizes it as not treating her poorly one might argue with that but if you look at the case she wasn't physically harmed while he was his question if we were to conclude that she has shown persecution and the presumption then kicks in we don't need to go remand for a finding as to the likelihood of rather persecution we were in there for the extra exercise of discretion correct that i actually did look at that in this matter and concluded that it's unlikely that she would suffer persecution if in fact she were to be returned and the fact that he looked at were the country report which stated that they had been a thief firing eritrean between the two countries that deportations had stopped that she was she was not deported she was able to retain her ethiopian passport but that means that founded fear of future persecution even though he did not find path persecution and as i said relied on several factors and concluded from those factors that she did not that the country conditions had changed and that she was unlikely to suffer persecution any any woman who happens to be a mother convicted of a crime it stands to incarceration if somebody is a subject of persecution well that would be though the state performing a legitimate function here she was arrested without a was a parallel between what happened in ethiopia and what the nazis did in i think germany and that's why they say that the idea of citizen strips citizenship stripping is a very certainly is persecution but since that had not been addressed by the