ghassan described was diagnosed as severe several policy from birth resulting in a deformed left arm and left leg very low intellectual functioning and a sleep disorder resulting in daily fatigue in fact she lived with her parents until she was fifty years old before living moving out her own with parental systems for a body year until she was let go by wal mart and this case the l j committed reversible error by failing to get sitter crowds impairments in combination ignoring the combination of parents deciding to only three pages of evidence three pages to find a finding of a sedentary to avoid of finding a sedentary residual  he which would have resulted in a medical vocational and as of our th birthday they'll do never mentions that career was never able to work full time and was forced to take family leave from wal mart before being let go by the company in another air they always he also failed to follow the express requirements of so security ruling ninety six point eight p c by failing the crude to include the required initial function by function r c assessment of the seven strength functions sitting standing walking lifting carrying pushing pulling in the decision this court has addressed this ruling and found a jet ski at dale jr was not bound by the ruling however just contains legal  circuit court holding that conflicts with  ruling outside of what jet ski says which requires this ruling acquires an initial resume of functional capacity assessment the statement of the state of the functioning of the claimant as in this edition must be given function by function with all seven strength demands and that did not happen in this decision going through some of the cases cited in jesse they were distinguished in the brief already but m was a four circuit case it actually supported the requirement that national function by function assessment and probably discuss and explains the difference so in the requirements in the initial are residual functional capacity or r jesse which but this case confuses the initial assessment with a step five current recesses assessment so that cases it's just not reliable because they didn't even understand that the difference between the two sections ignores that in the mandatory language of the ruling finally the power which is a circuit case mr to represents the purpose of the ruling and fails to acknowledge the binding language of the ruling consequently the holding a jet ski is basically just patently wrong it's it is mandatory this says this decision was also palli not supported by substantial evidence because they are only considered three thousand one hundred and twenty three pieces of evidence crags function report the only republican piece of evidence that she actually personally completed but was the most heavily weighted there relied on piece of evidence and decision relied on again and again but that the problem was a mis krog who's obviously mentally deficient as well i didn't want to put her all her disability down on paper and so she basically said in that function report that she was pretty much doing great and and this is the clear outlier among the evidence  these on page two hundred and forty three to forty eight as the none of the other evidence shows that she's able to do all the things she said she could do by herself it's just think she went and didn't want to cast yourself in a bad light the only other two pages of evidence to develop a full and fair record and failure to defer philosophic ation is good cause to remand for the gathering of additional evidence this case is a very short record however inspection of the record is highlighted by a number of glaring  omissions that were evident to anybody who reviewed the decision including the lack of a department of education resources records which would have contained location and testing results and notes from credits job coaches we've been highly probative evidence treated her for a year in two thousand and sixteen in two thousand and fifteen for her cerebral palsy and seizures and the lack of evidence of her mental and physical limitations really demanded that the judge send her out for a st exams into the state agency or the a l j should a center offer something exams sad this is just to see what kind of function she really had as to the credibility assessment a summary analysis of the evidence was completed and no one sentence a single the record was incomplete it does make it harder on i there are so many glaring omissions if well i say it's glaring is it because if you read through the if you read through the record that there is l these medicals that i just talked about was listed line for line and that yet turn it into anything about it but that the judge certainly had a chance to look at it if you reviewed the record it was glaring that these things were missing and i think that you know this is a tough tough burden and most tailgaters don't have to have the burden but in this case there was just listed right out in front of them and i really think that it was important enough since we only have thirty two pages cited by the judge  by the plaintiff the function report followed by just the old not entirely consistent boilerplate language is not allowed in the circuit and it was actually no assent no assessment was ever actually attend finally in this case is just like browning said in my brief where that plane was unable to live alone without assistance so national job numbers became irrelevant and local job numbers and the find a lock area requests were required but not provided by law but job because of a customer service issue there also contemporaneous medical records showing that she was not fired for anything related to a medical impairment ezekial or mental this case as mr cox are pointed out does not have a lengthy record but that burden and the burden in with all claimants who are applying for disability insurance benefits is to provide all of the proof to f gale j with the evidence that the l j needs to make a decision and in this case as judge easterbrook points out her previous counsel at the hearing crew firm the completeness of the record and recently in a non  court in harrisburg ceasar just last month this court said that any o j is reasonable in proceeding on a record that previous counsel confirmed was complete that's exactly what happened here with regard to sending miss krog out for further examination on this record which again was not one week it was nonetheless enough for an a j to make a decision on disability because again the records which mostly cream gave her allegation that she had problems and the kind of work limitations that would exceed what was in the mail jase decision even the records post stating the march th teen operated date in this case again her primary care fifty six as for these other records that mr scar refers to her previous counsel again didn't point the o j to that the previous counsel requested relief from the appeals council which is the within the agency to review the l g s decision and even in that brief to the agency's appeals counsel the previous counsel didn't attach or provide this additional evidence and then the court below in this crowd and a a number of years over a dozen years and it was two thousand and fifteen when she left that work and then fell below that kind of earning threshold but again the l j had no evidence before him that the and he proceeded through the five step sequential evaluation process and in this case one layer in the omission from mr starr's presentation is the a l j finding at step four  expert and the question that her previous counsel half or the expert only related to whether the jobs that the vocational expert identified were unskilled and the expert confirmed that all three of the sample jobs for j's decision was supported by substantial evidence there is simply no factual error or legal error that has been shown for this court to send this case back to the agency for further proceedings the social security ruling issue has been decided in a published situation from this court and jesse without getting into the legality and the accuracy of sr circus decisions