the so i think that's the first point with these improvements of view it's on so doing exactly what they were supposed to do which is they are reducing the to family three family obviously this is currently primarily a two family neighborhood  the other or the third my third observation and i'm not suggesting that this should be part of the discussion tonight or the process for this for merrill wrote to you because it is only site plan look at where these houses would rank with respect to other single families and among their of the thirty nine single family houses in the neighborhood seventy seven a would be number thirty six which means it's among the largest and i believe thirty seventy eight would be thirty first again among the largest and not the haven't made that distinction in till now i'm not suggesting that it be part of our discussion tonight but i think it is something big going forward to keep you in the smaller neighborhoods where we're not looking at it and it's something we'll want as a board we should consider whether we want to incorporate would suggest is having just another state that looks exactly like this but if it's a one family compares it only with one families and if it's a two family comparison only with the troops families again and i think this is very much in the spirit of the advice we got from town council which is we're going to look at all these things and they will inform our judgment to varying degrees so that if there are any questions ha next twenty five percent top twenty five percent only makes sense if the numbers are spread out when all of the whip when you only have one number everything else three bedrooms for everything has either two or three bedrooms  well it's just not very helpful and that's why we don't think these are tools we only use them when they get the job done some of those streets the streets came tends to look for them at the paving of the grass strip between the street and the sidewalk does not benefit the  elsewhere on the street to the best of my recollection he liked it like everyone else on the board had been on the street not counting the twenty years before that and looked at it but it's not you know that i think it would i think it would be foolish on our part not to listen to him to the inspector of buildings on something like this and you know we turn to the fire i would like to see if there is a trade because it is expensive there is a trade and you know my question say it would be ok you're not going to put in an extra six thousand dollars into a budget cut landscape is this the b possible use does this is the greatest enhanced meant you could buy for the neighborhood within the landscape portfolio of six thousand dollars because it is just because it is expensive and maybe the answer is years the forest service have done these studies all over the united states and street trees in front of a house at three or four or five percent to the value of each individual house it's on the order of seven to fifteen thousand dollars one hundred years ago and more now and the with the granite curb if you have a better than even chance of the street trees will mature about certain issues so the issues are the issues that i've heard at the moment are the current definition of the two getting us so which is the way that i have spoken out is what is the current definition this is what  around the single family lot size and fifty foot of lot frontage and what is printed here is actually the e mail response that i have from town council and it's actually quite different but what i had been made to believe the past twenty five any committee reports anybody would like to discuss property can be increased in value but the challenge is to measure the decrease in value of the number of the surrounding houses which is much harder for economists to deal with they can deal with the simple increase their property by property but that's why i think that it's appropriate for the found to be the root as a as a community issue rather than simply an economic issue it doesn't change the