limitations so i wonder latches we're talking about a situation where the court is going to park way short of statute of limitations based on both a combination of delay and some inequity something equity in the case and that's really the focal point of the analysis is whether there is in equity in the supreme court has laid out a few art tast in the pile case goes back a long ways and when you look at the test like the new great factors for you but basically what the test is looking at is  partners can and one of the things that you're really looking for is what what is the source of the problem where the problems come from is that attributable to some of these kind of in the course of these events why are we here to create the situation and so the they can be transferred without anybody knowing outside protocols and so what happens next ok that's a little bit further i don't want to call it consumes or deception but it's going to throw you off a sec ok don't use the word concealing but this keeping all this on the lowdown and making sure that everything looks white nothing's really change nothing that would arouse suspicion or make anybody wonder what's happening with the f contractors they just know the woman more senior are going to go ahead and sell the property to their brother will jr that's all that nobody's ever seen in the country you know and the families contend with that parents have already benefiting him why would you suspect that your bro then pay for the car why would you have any suspicion once why would you even know of the property records to go look and see if there's been any deep the property for all intents and purposes it appears as if the transaction was completed and as i went through all the things that will jr did terms of the things lead setting up the trust h or that no that that's true it does not necessarily mean that we don't know i agree we don't know but we really don't know for sure is that he took a step that harm that was questionable and it's questionable that's on that property and then he has to end up turning over all the bushels of corn and the profits to the bank he said well wait a minute you know latches latches and the court said no because the last was here you you were dealing in this you should have been on notice i don't know how they got we don't have the answer but it's true the second the small price was sixty thousand dollars it was a seventeen thousand dollars mortgage that the parents took out to buy the new plan will be where they move to no way to know if they were payments made after that or not and you think we don't know where they came from all i can tell you is that that document was produced in response to the build particulars we filed with the outs of the case when they released the defen all of that she wrote letters to robert and to john de parks and she told them specifically that she and her husband will sit here we're going to sell the farm we'll do it here and then she told the price and she said i'm going to  created transfer you this way he being in undercover those are the kinds of equities where the court says no you don't apply latches here because you have done everything possible to keep people from becoming suspicious that's those are the cases i possession he can wind of the contract here said that will junior could stay on the property and pay for it until ten years after more than well she died a year actually the march of the year following her death she to him and he had been operating right that they have no way you know with the terms were they were just told in a letter from their mother we are planning to take care of the world junior now he's going to get a deal on the property and you know that's how we take care of him out of his inheritance