facts on the record that judge fella who presided over this case was biased and legally should have recused herself under twenty eight u s c four for fifty five because she served in government counsel during the time that appellant case was before the southern district of new york she was chief of the appeals unit at the same time that my case was pending before in the southern district geology why do we need a judge that serves as a prosecutor at this time at the same time that appellant case is pending you know this a lot of the judges it's not the fact that she was a prosecutor before she was a properly exactly at that time to correlate the way half of the several trial judges are former prosecutors no i understand that that's not this issue is that i was there in the same time and also the allegations  similar that eventually the federal court picked up my case from the state court this case is relating to a civil matter regarding issues that happened in the state so that's my last point on that the next is that mr courtney has to judge in this case which was judge code will set a time for the defendants to respond to the complaint and they missed that time and once the time was missed i filed my motion for the entry of default and neither defendant attempted to raise waddy had good cause to before and the matter to default was mandatory and it was nondiscretionary under the cur in this in this court and that's the issue one that the next issue is motion to dismiss the court rarely addresses the sickly the facts that i raise except the court just glosses over them and just says this is conclusory which is a lot of court to do but the problem is the court never breaks down what the elements are that must be proved what must be there in the complaint so that it's no the court never addresses those issues and when i bring specifically different factual issues that challenges why it's not conclusory the court also is over and the defendants as well failed to address them  the state case it was for promotion of prostitution all state charges now the state charges were dismissed as a favorable terminations and i was granted  disposition in my favor which was posted on the docket with a court in the city now according to heck at that point if there's no further as things go and that's considered a favorite son nation under the heck doctrine however the court says because the federal charges were picked up and were relating to the state charges and because i was convicted in and federal court and not state court that because of that that should link card charges a different meaning that if i'm guilty of the federal charges that doesn't necessarily mean i'm guilty of the state and vice versa and also the charge is a completely different so the court to consider that the next issue is  absolute immunity the judge in a prosecutor's a not known for acts done related to investigator and that's a good story matters no are they for bribes which are letting legit in the complaint no are they for actual crimes being committed in this case promotion of prostitution and compelling prostitution and the last two issues is supplemental jurisdiction the court abuse of discretion and look and to applying that to the state law a claim that exists against certain defendant and leads to a man should have been granted had the court broke down which elements were missing and clearly some issues were not raised in my original complaint they were presented throughout the motion practice and the evidence was presented that could be added to the complaint to make it stronger with the court stated that because i was granted leave to amend in a separate although related case that i should not be