modify the parenting time for the minor child she was seeking a more traditional s which was the subject of some debate and i do you know what i was very clear that it was only seeking modification based upon the best interest of the child nowhere at any time the simple standard was best interests of the child and i think when you look at this case you have to start back with the evidence in two thousand and five this is when just of two thousand and seven the minor child starting telling this box stop in fact according to miss pasco it was on at least well different occasions and wouldn't be diane boss dollar testify at the trial she recommended that the visitation schedule be changed again the court is not bound by one person the court is bound by the entirety of the evidence but  october twenty second two thousand and eight and mr luko had an opportunity that neither the trial who or anyone else had mr up to go actually had an opportunity to repeatedly meet with the parents and the with the child in fact he testified that he interviewed a minor child in four different occasions interviewed parents interviewed the fourth grade teacher the principal and he also had the opportunity meeting with this minor child she told him this is the g a o which is by the court that she wanted to change his station she gave her reasons that's friends reasons say not wanting to spend as much with her father as with her mother and how his father questions the little girl about his love for him because she wants to spend more time with her mother than with her father and the result of this is that difficult and confusing to this little girl and it was difficult for bonding with her parents perch and hooper for take you live difficult in allowing his girl to participate in extra curricular activities at the school she went to which was two point five miles from lone sas you know who are also heard the testimony of the parties and both parties have nothing but good things to say about their relationship with the daughter and that's expected in these custody visitation trials but the court also had an opportunity to conduct in camera interview and i think this was a perfect opportunity for the poor to hear what this girl had to say and i would remind the the child even jaded mother didn't talk to her about going to the judge in fact it was a surprise to her that she was even there but she did cave to the horse to the judge again the ruling i am with this ruler and i and i and i and i for really really thought this was completely out of left field it was group fleetly contrary to the evidence that i heard at this trial the court made some interesting comments the first day protests she put this person down and said step down now that probably wasn't the best choice of words to use in this document that's filed with the school and is not going to be seen by anyone except for people at the another issue mr griffin never raised this issue of mr mrs griffin taking actions not likely to encourage very life in ship in fact the only evidence that i saw was this issue of mr griffin based on that evidence they did because there wasn't any other evidence to the contrary except for both parties saying that we love our daughter and want to have visitation was that action without conscientious judgement to me that means did you really think about it we're just going to shoot from the hip and i just looks like to me they didn't really give a damn much thought didn't go through this and look at the evidence in view of all the and it's continuing to hear it in two thousand for six years this is occurring every three year period a petition is filed by mrs which you've got to read the petition the petition is fraught with all at the beginning of this case when i think the parties were kind of going to they just separate so it her testimony if you look here it is to me inconclusive and certainly the one that he has the opportunity you jerk and yes i was the one that wanted the child to talk to the judge because i feel that all the evidence had to come in before the judge made that decision she didn't there to hear from the  was not being followed by this is in fact filed that she was making efforts to interfere with this relationship in this particular petition in the child's wishes were basically the best suggests that the child didn't made a schedule or ritually around mr griffin his work schedule and the minor child was small but her back does not become what's in the best interest of the allowed to or not being able to feel you know i'm not certain maybe she just maybe one of the reason she didn't like your risk because it was so difficult for her to travel and when you participate in something like that and then you have to travel back to best house with  you don't want to put on he said she said those are tactical decisions you make i don't think it should be held against someone for not putting out instead was an original petition o