no one can dispute that the ground group with your hundred help you well the the board construed the clan and the wearing clothes to to require that the ceiling and the movement had to happen at the same time rather than the case that before we were we got to look at the language of the poor us and it's hard to read it that way you or i when i was a bit of the again you're looking at when you're looking at various constructions and  i would think the the normal way of reading is the very most reasonable way even giving it the broadest interpretation is that the there we are in limitation takes place  problem that i heard in the in the discussion with counsel representing the metrics is the word step what is that all and what goal birchers understand and this is also with page twelve to thirteen of its opening breath is that the terms step in its claims one two three one entries are it must be understood in the broadest reasonable construction to embrace the entire addition steps that's one twenty to twenty one and activation step to activate selective regions of the substrate nine twenty two activation coupling steps are repeated lines twenty four to twenty six until the final d protection step and it goes on mon the additions step twenty eight threw out the goldberg specification as far as the terms st exactly what the board understood it to make you put on monomer and you attach the chemistry step or the activation step there are lots and lots of steps to building withdraw but that's not the way the application is ripped and it doesn't solve the same problem that we saw in fifteen nineteen which is broadening w doesn't get rid of the embalming this according to the goldberg argument was too narrowly construed by definition the boards understanding of what claims one and three men must be subsumed within this broader plan and that's not disclosed the poor and specifically asked counsel for gold in oral argument required but normally you would say ok these claims should be interpreted to have different meaning and the only difference are the two things that were pointed out one the sealed during the reaction or when performing a reaction that's just the way it's built you you asked the question about how you come up with so many adventures this is tough stuff and again there is a need i think to understand what is going on with this invention and why is this all important this movable seal relationship well it turns  out if you read the basque pappy you know this it turns out that deposits of indian water did interfere with the reaction and so what bass did was to set that's what the inventions as a whole is all about that's what goldberg does not describe because their case is not about that at all i'm happy to answer your questions but never have to belabor your time i would only surface and the chemical addition of the next base so we're not talking about every single step of the process covered by this this claim is that this doesn't fall to some that describes that but then you would want to say well what isn't described is that pretty relative movement happens when the reaction chamber is sealed and therefore because that was the plane construction the written description it was found to be