distributed learning server comprising and then it has a bunch of software elements so all i don't understand how that makes it some sort of special piece of machinery this seems to me no different than the old fashioned allopath argument which by the way i was the big fan of but nonetheless have lost which is that new software makes a new computer each time you run it that seems to be what you're trying to say you're you have a new server because you're running different software on it that means we're going to call it a distributed learning server but it's not actually like a unique piece of hardware correct it is true we do know it's a standard server that's correct just running this particular software that a server in almost all the owners the claim could be the same except that instead of the environment of learning and shopping where there is actual you know someone slaying or modeling the clothes or what have you and it's interactive that way how is that any different i mean it's not a technological advantage in the sense that the servers change or it's different it's improving the technology in the way that people are the speed in which images are being santa or something like that to tie computers together you do so under the control of a server and there is code that says do this and do that and what so the seems to me that all these claim is is trying to say is that well here here's my idea let's provide distributed learning using a computer system that's it and there is nothing you know and fish like in terms of well our distributor does this in this because it scenically design and distributed server work our code does something unique there's nothing unique here in fact this special occasion makes it perfectly clear that this whole system is made up of conventional well understood ordinary pieces of computer equipment so that leaves you in a bit of a predicament spending all your spending all your time trying to show us how your case is like bad as com d d r and fish i understand why those are the only ones that have come out really that are in favor of and there are differences between your case and each one of those who may not be willing to admit to it but there are so the question is how does your taste survive the term herschel how does your case survive the there's a pretty small money a precedent that we have patent lays out in great detail here all of the different analogues that prior art existed that all allowed for distributed learning unlike in mass comp there was no no new computer version to do what baz comp did here there are lots of other ways to do this and there articulated in the background section of your patent it's just you found a way that's a bit more efficient and a bit more successful at doing so not that i don't think that should be patent eligible but under the body of law that i'm stuck living with and you know what there used to be an abacus and then there was a calculator and now that math can be done on a computer much more efficiently it's still not patched knowledgeable after alex and that's kind of like exactly what you have here you have the you're demonstrating the evolution  human beings did exactly what you're doing now less efficiently than you've created a mechanism to do doesn't mean i don't think it's an invention it just means that under the body of law i don't see how you fall outside of the umbrella of everything that's been swept it under that alice the abstract idea classroom and saying we are better you are different because we are putting on as that's all this is an undercurrent this better and different right it works better you don't need by special software everybody's got it is better and different