MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
this at the time of the trial they were ages five three two girls there's no issuers the wife was great because the husband is a civil engineer and was working for the state the issue is whether or not judge nor do it abuse his discretion in the apportionment of the park minus twelve thousand dollars there was debt as compared to the s s the husband came out with a cost of nine thousand dollars for a mercedes automobile but judge then awarded the wife ten thousand dollars the payable installments in order to equalize the distribution why are we here were claiming that the two properties that the judge balanced out with mortgages and with and with were was incorrect according to the wife's own testimony which is at page mortgage so why isn't he showing what you know if you subtract forty six one from seventy five you got around thirty thousand so i think i think his figures  dollars cost to repair that bill they were paid forty seven thousand dollars the wife said she used that money to rehabilitate repair the fire damage  all records was all her testimony that i used that money forty seven thousand west five there's forty two thousand i'm a college that was the insurance and the wife as to acquisition of assets and or dissipate since she spent twenty three thousand on her own credit cards the husband at this is she comes out with everything and maybe that exploded a little higher and he comes out with a mercedes which she has to pay or the worst  marital property of the house in the division we're not saying his people have a lot of we're not saying that he should should get all equity in the property but what he wants the rental properties he's found them and he was rebel rehabilitation then when she took up the mor such a small amount it's the issue of i guess fundamental fairness he came out with nothing he made contributions including money to see that in there we believe things there that i did but had no documentation support at all these people that helped him and worked with him and he paid them money where did this money come from that he paid these people there is no record indicate that he ever in any money he's talking nine thousand that he has to pay ten he doesn't take into account then misess he invites came out short in the fact that she has twenty one thousand dollars in debt and and has an obligation from him
offer for sale because it wouldn't upgrade the contract if it meant except if if the offer had been made the day before the critical day when as i understand it the the the particular thought they were producing items in april you have no that's not correct your honor the only evidence in the record is april twenty second ninety nine and six letter from mr potter to electr it was supposed to perform this function and there was an offer to to to to sell it at that time it really doesn't make any difference does it whether the buyer knew what it was that was being offered as long as the offer was clear enough as to what it was that was being offered that i have to describe the claim limitations in the offer itself right i don't believe that's correct and earlier and the reason is is that i believe elect why does it matter that the recipient of the offer know something if the author is clear enough as to what he covers libya has got the two components is the composer the author and then it discusses the component that the only thing that we need to and the main issue here is is whether this was an offer a commercial offer perceval of what they're saying what they're saying is that this product was still in development in february that couldn't imagine an offer for sale because the  it's not sufficient was their testimony here and what was meant by the offer letter was the particular product that was all the mostly the subject of the past yes mr potter so testified was ready propounding we're dealing with the question of whether the offer was a commercial offer for sale or could be accepted and that would seem to depend on the state of development of the proc whether at that time that he was offering it had been sufficiently where is the i just looked at the testimony on those pages but i don't see on those pages that the testimony that the products that he was offering to sell had been developed to the point where it satisfied the claim patients how do i know is on page one hundred eighty three of this testimony i take it in with reference to the product mentioned in the letter is and he's asked about the product that he was promising to no but that that testimony links up it seems to me or perhaps it doesn't but if not tell me why the model c with the with the products mentioned in the letter the testimony was a trial which i'm going to dispute virus if i understand you correctly would send it to delta eldred not come out until after at the request of other folks who wanted the dr phil in the kitchen but there was already disclosed in the model
land of lincoln supposed to know about your lying how far do you have to go in determining who may or may not be quote influence well that would go to the breach of duty if you your honor and hypothetical but not the beneficiaries who would have taken my test and see in this case that they stay in the same position as persons who t you're saying that no court has to turn and think any proceeding whether or not this gentleman was competent at the time he executed as well as for oh i mean there describing has to be in parts and has to describe the basis for your six one five and the basis for your six one night so at least from my perspective it's very  know in this order what was the basis for judge kelly's dismissal i can't tell and if you can't tell me i'm happy to listen to that but i think six one five and respectfully disagree filing of the will contest and selma so the question i have is what about mr canada's argument that the filing of the will contest set aside that december twelfth order then agree that the filing of the will contest proceeding temporarily sets aside the order but does not settlement without any further finding of legal capacity in the settlement documents correct yes ok so and then you fast forward to the filing of the legal malpractise suit on june twenty sixth twenty strictly a settlement so you're saying that because there was a settlement of some kind that we should automatically assume that the issue of legal capacity was decided because this case because he was unique in its banks and this court decision would be narrow it would be only with respect to this kind of special situation could there ever meet and they say that you know they talk about it  the play or they're in the additional documents that were attached to the motion to dismiss and were perfectly happy for the work to look at all of those documents is a part of this motion because the factual not really disputed what's
a constructive trust and the pill was the statute and said that the planes are guesses so whoever the people are they keep time records so that they are able to accurately identify the amount of time that they're spending on this and the claims that are in dispute here how do you do that with respect to the other things other than their time such as you know whatever it takes to keep a building functioning if you're in the building some places like there is you know like the in power how do you do the allocation that can seem like there's a lot of expenses all the california insurance here the font in the liquidation of lumbermen's workers compensation the general history you don't dispute the fact that if you submit
may be doing you graphs to help the community so it's just an idea a big thing for us we're looking at modifying the plan just a little bit i'm not going to go into it right now especially in light of a third of these are sure that it's safe for the participants and safe for the officers of the world is public is going out of their way in now to say hello and to show their appreciation to the police officers people are dropping food off of the station and just if you can see it you can see you can sense and you can feel the support from the community who graduating with the eighty for a lot of other there's three other personnel who are either of this disc last or the past last in the second who for whatever reason illness or injury missed training portions of training that could not only be made up at that time so we have to insert a when when this current in the fourth class gets to that portion of the tr
says the title is action subject to noble review due process so sequentially it seems that the general assembly at least by putting it stitched limitations in such and twenty five at least contemplated decision the decision that's at issue here is the trial court in the trial court didn't really give any analysis as to why you believe section twenty five could cause of action it just simply said to the city societies i disagree most of the night that was is the entire motion to dismiss and eleven thirteen twenty five was not it issued what was it issued was a standard of review correct correct and our poor justice shots because it was the offer said indeed it is not a standard  than constitutional questions are you equally for municipalities not for the circuit court would you agree with them i would agree with the general office net that is up to mr powell but why should the circuit court be reviewing the fifteen twenty five create this ninety day isn't this a does this create something new something different indeed something that should be looked back and what's the purpose of putting it in the statutory authority if it doesn't
walked away from the scene of the battery hearing something in his hands and it became clear that those were the banks say when the program later on in the getaway the answer to that question here is that they did evidence system various elements for example the smith case where a threat was made to the employee store employee and then the employee took the money and left it outside in a phone booth and then returned back again and later the defendant came and picked up the money and i got was that that was not robbery under the statute because it was not a taking under from the person of the presence of the actually how the taking of the money itself you're saying that's not robbery taking the the money that the the a robbery was the punch taking the money is not robbery is it  you think you reply it was based on the circumstances that the victim was targeted right at the bank that he was at that time during the bank back and then with respect to around the person within the car at the time here with an additional prior act where he had done a very
allege after his initial advances were rebuffed he started to complain about her work but i didn't see any of that in the you know i know all that i'm talking about something much more specific which is two three places in  complaining about her work but i didn't see anything in the factual submissions and this is a summary judgment that we're talking about that supported so you're now limiting it to that the which he said to her has a way of explaining why she had to come in i just want to make sure that the two things you just mentioned i'm not saying they're relevant i just wanna make sure that's what you're now referring to when you say she that he criticized her work yes  sounds like some kind of quid pro quo maybe not the kind of quid pro quo that would support the claim but it's on its face it is a quid pro quo with those latin words mean anything and then and then she's told the second time that she must come in on the sunday why isn't that implicit if you don't come in you are going to be punished in your but but they do according to the i mean neatly by getting her in there on a sunday according to the allegations he was able to rape her because he had her alone with no one else there well i mean that's the we're dealing here with she's testified that she was raped and we have to explain that for purposes of this appeal yes you also i was but bothered by you you at the age of twenty seven of your brief you say that her deposition testimony quote confirms that no quid pro quo theory of recovery was intended but you then  is that she testified that he never expressed sleep explicitly said he was going to fire or to vote that's different from that's that's not a concession there wasn't an i understand that's one possible way of feeling but why couldn't a reasonable church say no he was saying to her you must come in to finish his work because even though he was not her normal work hours and and and the result would be that the two of them would be alone and that would give him the opportunity to rape her and the only reason she came in the second time after he had raped her according to her allegation was because she recently feared that he was saying in effect you're going to be fired if you don't do this she had to come in to finish her work because he was doing monday and so forth feud that was a in effect a thread to take had verse employment action then she succumbs to that in the sense of coming in that think gives her pet him the opportunity to commit the rape that that would have to be put in fire stude your position that that would have to be your argument
we've discussed schreiber is all about auto immune deficiencies it's not directed to postmenopausal osteoporosis and all it shows it's useful in humans but optimization because regardless of what initial expectations was the finding was that people skilled in the are routinely optimized for the lowest dose that will get the full facts and nothing about the initial expectation if you know the formulations to show that you disclosed to the the group comprised of the greed well the first of all the intention to discover
delegated six thousand five hundred like he indicated that the best use was agriculture agricultural in his appraisal and that it would be a saleable at fifteen thousand dollars an acre  takes a little bit longer to sell but it's sell and this property that's going to be developed because of where it is doesn't mean it has to be developed more moral not just property is wild with the idea that it's going to necessarily be that the people didn't take a vacation for twenty years because even though this was this was a property that had been that he had prior to various it had for a decade or so prior to marriage the life right after the marriage and two years later they started working on this and they were going this for twenty years and if you read all the things that she did with this property and she did in the four hundred dollars was a guarantee the only thing you need here thanks both of you for your arguments will take the matter
curse and throughout this period he's represented by counsel he never notifies say hey i've changed my mind i i'm going to offer my testimony now he's represented by counsel throughout  held in contempt for refusing to answer your real question if he was never called to testify i mean you know part of part of the agreement is i'm going to give you the minimum if you agree to test right now you may never testified that you're going to do this with him but you're arguing that if he's called to testify and says i' until they won't testify so it's different in this circumstance and that's where i would say i disagree that ours is not important because powers has to do with punishment for the past there whether it's the attorneys or this is this is an issue which is our common walking time power provides an appropriate revealed tool to discourage witnesses who continue contemptuous refuse to comply with the water coolers essential to prevent the breakdown of proceedings so told what penalties he faces and putting him be put into the crucible of the trial on the witness stand and given the opportunity to make that decision do you have a case i mean i'm just asking is your case that how is it finding that there was no provocation consistent reality in the facts of the case was going case well that there was no if there was no evidence again and that's what i was going to next and dive when they said that there was evidence that other witnesses had been for it and we don't really did gave him the right to decide whether or not he would testify would be against public policy one of the i think as you said before so i guess we have to look at what the agreement was i just presumed that it was valid like in here the agreement knew when they cut a deal with someone to testify otherwise
i think the first question to answer is that this is the same person whose record is seventy three and the two point and i think this is the answer to that question is yes at the end of the day  is it if it if we don't know because i would even want to sign if it doesn't have some value why would it be included within the settlement or he wanted five million dollars plus the game contribution
good evening ladies and gentlemen welcome to a winter field house and belmont massachusetts for tonight's basketball game the home opener for the belmont maracas who went to this game three you know they have so far this year be in melrose stone m and boston english and they are taking on an inexperienced according to coach male or of wilmington and inexperience momentum wildcats  number three was three rebounds ramsey stops us it's a back up the bottles bottle s three twenty nine to go in the first per the bottles bottles with a three the first one i think it was too quiet in here didn't quite get the right spot on the back board three point attempt the ball bounces up and hit some don't again and that holds the brings the back board up out of play when they built houses are being sports have less than a minute to go in the first period delmon up twenty one nine ten has five team falls and belmont has four that loud noise you thought might be an explosion was actually the band i don't know if you can pick up the music in the background he certainly ought to be able to pick up the drums after tonight's game belmont go on a christmas break starting wednesday and the next game i believe is next tuesday which makes the first one check with producer jeremy measure to see whether this microphone actually picks up the band in the background for forty one to go in the second period on the rebounding attempt twenty seven eighteen three thirty eight to go in the second period i was at the game the other night and when belmont had a similar experience of being way ahead of the all that game was much closer in the first half than this one the good news for d i is that a lot of players are getting some early season experience which throws the strength of the team a girls team will see you in a short period of time for the second half for the boys game well we're ready to go for  the second half of the teams will be coming out sharply belmont leads in this game fifty six twenty five for the half time playing very young and inexperienced only stone  doesn't matter because this team game seventy five thirty three team falls on belmont in june try one seconds left in the game
now don't take along your own hands again jim leave that to me oh hickory we wouldn't do that for the world that don't fit into our plans at all not all well we'll have to do something about that you know then they must have gotten away well i got to go back to the bank
visible later on but i think the important thing here is this this is an issue for the jury this this jury saw the pictures they listened to the they listened to the police officer testify they listened to this house testified they think he is such a sense of credibility from these witnesses or lack thereof chan the fact that she did this work now i don't know how wrong but she she did miss work she did say that after a couple days the pain subsided her next statement was like something about keeping your leg would like to reiterate yes the jury listened to all the evidence here but they asked for help in defining great bodily harm things you had confusion about whether this was suppression and while differences over to the fact finder
know i don't know what it's just possible mr wilkins that go in there isn't the right man for the job you know his record going to storm has the full confidence of the club sponsors kept on he is completely regenerated i don't understand that very easily i mean his innocence established you got his father to come down here to go to bat for you i hope he succeeds with them in i'm sure that they will and i want to thank you for your cooperation kept on keeping young guys out of the reform school is a hobby of mine b probably will that seems to amuse you hardly somebody that i know that more again unless i'm very much mistaken they will see to it that you never have a chance to testify against them they have too much at stake yes i know that threatening we stoop when  good evening why is the house dark won't you come in feel just like so white she gives you an apple don't e you cannot escape what's the matter of you seen a ghost i told you they trail me i'm not safe i haven't seen any strangers i did that window only five minutes ago your imagination how could the best part of  not here with the boys their guardian he's appeared a murderer i remembered he's a member the more you get those boys are just a cover up i'm not a member of any gang you're upset it's just a what do you want you have such nice soft white skin nora had right skin like that until it became yellowed and shriveled city pretty all night ye the judge or did you yes i thought i heard a noise in the up stairs hall i would understand he was all right he was dead a lot like that when i left him earlier in the evening but i found it open this minute stop the dramatics you know where she is all right go on and i'll keep an eye on you in the living room until morning danny you know what i think you know what i think i didn't watch it  didn't kill him but i'm glad he's dead this is going to be a long hard job and i can do it better without such a large audience you kids want to help going to if you can find a cook to cook that's right he still  why did you come i didn't camping i like to cook less and we're going to stay here until you talk i didn't do it you did it because he saw you kill pocket didn't you talk you've got to get hold of yourself not me or did this and we'll have the murder
you got his father to come down and go to bat for you i hope he succeeds with them in the others i'm sure that he will and i want to thank you for your cooperation kept on keeping on baes of the reform school is a hobby of mine yes yes i go there's no boat sailing for today judge to date today that's too late giles that's right judge two whole days in that time most anything can happen probably will that seems to amuse you hardly subway line know that my gang and i'm very much mistaken they will see to it that you never have a chance to testify against them they have too much at stake yes i know that's what we're used to when  you cannot escape oh there you are i wondered where what's the matter if you seen a ghost i told you they trail me i'm not safe i haven't seen any strangers i did that window only five minutes ago your imagination how could way is out of the way a slow embezzling of a point you might never be found on read me out of the way you can get hold of her and her money perhaps you know something about these death threats don't be ridiculous don't go pretty lady don't go yes what do you want you have such nice soft white nor i had white skin like that until it became yellow didn't shriveled tookie pretty on remember i warned you leave this house tonight all night ye this minute stop the dramatics you know where she is all right go on but i'll keep an eye on you in the living room until morning