thank you and good morning my name is george to read some very on behalf of the petitioner about wonder car this is a petition for review of the board of immigration appeals his decision which affirmed without opinion the immigration judges decision which is therefore the final agency determination this case we review the immigration judge's decision for substantial evidence the sole and threshold issue in this case is credibility  to an adverse credibility finding must be supported by specific encroaching reasons and cannot be based on mere speculation conjecture conjecture or unfounded assumptions in the present case the first issue i like to bring forward to the court is d on direct that the police falsely accused her brother of militant activity and of committing several crimes she stated unequivocally that her  not a militant and despite that fact the immigration judge in his in his decision on page forty five states it's fish turn to testify that that her brother may or may not have been a militant however she also clarified her testimony again on page one thirty six on cross and the ministry of record thing where the government's attorney asked her if she had previously indian police and what time of the day she was arrested granted the immigration judge did not rely on these issues for his adverse credibility finding quite the show the immigration judge is tendency to mischaracterize a position as testimony transport and valid passport she did not travel on its user and password that was given to her by her agent to travel on to canada and then to the united states i believe and then when she came to the united states she requested believe the indian consulate here in america for her valid passport which she had lost apparently in india so that to verify her identity for that purpose so i don't the judge does say that the fact that  traveled on this on a different passports come the united states i think you refer to it as as having an aura fabrication but when when and in these types of cases when applied to the immigration service coming across the border and she y states she relied on on his on his advice and his ability to help her out of india and and moreover when the immigration judge questions the way she entered the united states because she wouldn't tell them where it was well they were pursuing him because of his political views and then they they persecuted her because they felt that she had knowledge of his whereabouts and they also associated her with his political views because for four inch four inch long stick two inch thick and she also had requested medical documents concerning her brother who did go to a medical doctor and there was a hospital only a mile and a half four and disappeared never to be heard from again in january of ninety five yet no spell wonder how are introduced into evidence medical report concerning her brother from hundred ninety seven even though she testified that the that neither she nor her family had ever heard from him again and of course the part of all to have medical records from someone that you have no idea where they are india is that true he was treated as far as she knows in one thousand nine hundred ninety four where in india my question was you said there would be no way without contacting the brother that she could just see the medical that her brother had been arrested the last time in december of ninety ninety four and the reason for his arrest was involvement in the assassination of the punjab chief minister  that he may have then a militant that is i mean there was some question as to whether he was a militant or wasn't cheap he didn't say definitely she had sa so i'm not sure that that immigration judge can be pinned to a mischaracterization of here where her testimony was all over the place in terms of exactly what her brother was involved in and why he was arrested six times by the police immigration judge said that she had testified that it's listed in her declaration that they told the police that she was running out of the house when the police came to look for him but she testified and through consistently on direct and cross examination that he just appeared from the hospital on january twenty ninth ninety five this is not inconsistent with her declaration as you can see on page five twenty of the imagery of record the third paragraph states the reason and states the last time they heard of him was when he left the hospital and then in the next paragraph it says that they told the police that he was running out of the house when when they when he thought he was going to be arrested and tortured so it's clearly in this in this situation what the reality is and was it the same treating doctor same treating hospital so they just go back always been treated before or was it some other hospital and if some other hospital how did they i mean of all the hospitals in india how do they not ask that one i mean there's a there's a puzzle in there for me  if you don't know where the brother is how do you find out records for a period of medical treatment for the brother i mean what what how do they know what to ask i don't know your honor i don't i don't recollect where from what hospital the document to come from what we do know from the records that she testified over and over and over again that she doesn't know where her brother is and she wasn't aware that her father now if her father simply didn't tell it that's that's calls for speculation now that record she sent back or i m ashcroft just the beginning