MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
not a moving security a chance to distribute the stuff which might be at any moment you speak german under me and my canadian got a chemical expect and the scenes are at the moment you could get into romania i'm afraid all i know about spying isn't picked up from one or important quite there's some nice things about you but damaging to the right if you did fall into the wrong hands who would not be a comm to say that this murder took place less than fifteen minutes ago why are you sure captain who will never be a kind of a military intelligence you know you're taking a big chance on me i'm taking a chance on what's behind your eyes look at me when you do the same with me that was why i was so easy with him i wanted to see if he'd mentioned to me again this morning but did he just as i was coming out of my roots he suggested this again in the house this  i like to hear from them tell me more of what you're doing to get rid of i want to hear i want to hear it from you got it's big inside detail walk through the bottom always and you will find that as quickly as possible very big one i'm here to wreck then you'll get slammed i'm working there now but i must have help chemicals at least make pocket bombs men they don't make them tonight now the shipping  i suppose you realize this is all
proceedings held outside the presence of the jury as a presence of the court reporter i mean it was very clear to see in this case that the trial court was picking a jury and it was set for trial that day there was no backing down from that  trial but if the state had asked under the statute cited by justice work at and the trial court had granted the continuance of that time it would have gone beyond the speedy trial case has been going on for a really long time but we're not going to continue this forever and it made a recommendation and the recommendation was here's we're going in this well we'll start with trial  trial without a lawyer in the absence of or by the state to proceed to trial and upset to where the state would hit to make a showing that the defendant was purposely trying purposely trying for trial which they may have been able to do given his these police officers were all members of the belgian game task force and happen to know where they likely might be now as to the issue of dismissing the charges just show the trial was the one who basically said i'll give you ten minutes bring your witnesses for move to dismiss your case the issue of dismissing the case is entirely illusory as everybody here is new in this case is more than five years old and the state of illinois in the statute of limitations know we're not sure that we can locate them in time and then there is the written motion for continue it's the to lose no discussion entertaining as to how much time to take there's no discussion about how this time was less than a speedy trial off i think it's reasonable for there to dismissal in this case only furthers the notion that these situations can be handled in a trial courts appropriately and that's why if anything this state should be allowed to bring this case back into the trial court to bring these if we do bring the
where a case like this one allows the jury to speculate as to the cause of injury here and this is this this idea of additional instruction has been recognized in illinois  last chance of survival in a medical malpractise case as i said before there's a good one for the cases that we cite introduces a concept into the proximate cause of analysis that didn't exist before and that is is it's very it is very complex but what about the fact that i can only has had opportunity since these cases to new instructions that reflect their theory of the case am basically bringing the instruction to the particular theory of the case why isn't there an abuse of discretion for the sure it says that it is a look at the last one but is sufficient of it concurs with some other cause acting at the same time which in combination with the causes the injury well the jury w it's more probable than not the baby was going to die then the natural probable sequence is that the doctor made the difference in the death of the baby because the natural probable result here
appears to be little question that he and the second sued the alcohol in the park the question is whether he considered alcohol before he dropped and initially one officer bush asked him do were you drinking in the park he initially said no car he didn't see the defendant we know that despite the fifteen minute period that he spent looking around for him was a period of time during which the defendant was already in the place arrives there's nobody in the car he's evidence of an action that he is preparing an action report when he sees the defendant stumbling towards the car he has defended two questions at that point he said is this your car and did you characterized by the defendant that he was simply lying in a tight driveway and couldn't turn around the witness mr earle testifying here squealing tires not only does he see the defendant coming to the driveway to higher speed he's driving on the sidewalk he comes up to is a four foot wide sidewalk and mr earle testifies that the driver side of the cadillac is brushing along the hedgerow completely on the sidewalk he then drives further down the sidewalk where  decide whether or not there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he was impaired when he was trying to where's the impaired driving where's the band trying to keep going back to sleep tires and i'm asking you to connect that to an impairment al that now lack of company there was a reference if you watch the video back at the police station the bush made some reference to his passenger he said we talk i don't remember where name was base that we talked to her but the state didn't call her to either robbery or to refute th after all started yelling to people to call the police assuming he heard can do that i think of a situation where we'd be two meters our head in an argument you know between their yards over something and it starts
the the oh oh a
it's now become their obligation follow through where he left off my friends
and the with you are you oh yeah
so perhaps that you
we're going to call people versus brandon jobson the same jury that had the reluctance of service and you're also in the he was in he was uncomfortable sitting in judgment on someone else is the point you're making that that they may be the two that they didn't challenge several white may have also had records and we don't know that and then they chose the state chose to overlook that i mean that's a state's attorney told the jury that islands are for me to spend and johnson is presumed innocent and has been through this whole trial well until now because that is over he has been proven guilty a argue inferences from the facts and so what we are submitting then following the objection was never repeated again that he was not presumed i thought you simply argued well he's been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt after the objection burden of removing the plug and and again we offered the same distinguishment that that while the right the repetition perhaps a place during a small amount of time it was significant enough given  of reasons for not only being be on the jury he said he had problems sitting in judgment of any human being he did not like the idea of going to anybody he felt that the worst thing he could do this hurts someone and they are not guilty there to observe this and in my brief i discussed the deference should be given to the crown court who could observe these who could observe the prosecutors and that's really the most important thing here is what judge the next day and we can't overlook the fact that he was accepted by the prosecution and the prosecution certainly had no way of knowing that when charges or convictions and left this blank then they would be answering truthfully but if they did have prior criminal charges or fictions then they could not leave this blank and say nothing and be truthful and that's the distinction here the only person that the only potential juror that morgan would be similarly situated situated with would be someone who had a prior criminal charge who failed to respond affirmative this is an entirely unsupported or something like that but even when that exact hypothetical was presented to both experts they said you couldn't get this constellation of injuries from treated the baby operated on and then said and i'm quoting him when he says in the constellation kristen's injuries i have never seen a simple fall produce this level of injury he gave no more jurors in the case of morgan downie perhaps there would have been something different but they're just not on the record as that is what we're left with among the seven rivera factors as who is like who is black who is strong and was similarly situated your honour's or third submission with regards to sufficient evidence of knowing time it does not matter what the defense counsel theory was at trial the issue here is whether or not the state offered proof that there was knowing
and don't try anything funny i'd hate to think i get it wrong we w that to give the horses a breather that's i mean the us has been limping for the last half hour you those men are coming in here like it was payday over here it me that kept the still before i use the departure have  everything the coyotes whoa whoa
than thank you to the briscoe bantling in their business associates at the end of the show the person at the table who has their birthday closest to bank some are going to date change will help assuage the printing and is our photographer of the day and i want to recognize one very special person who couldn't be here with us today and who hands thank you ashley and everyone enjoyed  have another member of the  there's also a member of the belmont  she
wasting our time got involved me i know nothing whatever about the matter that detective and the fact of the diamond do you imagine anyone will find it in my possession it would be so careless with you take my advice my young friend go back to geneva on the contrary for him and i shall accompany you to london with a police escort if it can be arranged there gentlemen if you're down that i guys but union is my right and i don't want to know yet what i've done professor my colleagues and i will tell you fifty thousand pounds for the exclusive control of the opera a bad bargain gentlemen after a few weeks my i don't see why he should call me get the equipment out of this box that you're going to keep your appointment with us we'll be there but we'll be there before nine o'clock and when professor goodman laboratory destroyed the body of mr roberts we'll have professor goodman some out of the way place in me we've got to do something can you remember anything about the third man who came out of the house aftermath along with a hit on the head of it dark but i  want to sit down doctor and it all began the doctor i want to man obviously impersonating you came to my flat this morning with a letter you recognize this it's just like in seal that this letter was done in my room last night and you didn't report it to the police not the police would only have made matters worse by publicizing what doesn't want to keep quiet now you please comply with consequences will be unpleasant
mr perkins of the greater of the madness of attempted murder the issue here really as i kind of summarized about is whether his subsequent prosecution he really in the people were suspicious on the greater sense of our violence but i did find it a bit of a guilty on the last aggravated battery a mistrial had been declare the problem with that is based upon the record of the case based upon the testimony by the defendant and the cell as well as the numerous witnesses who were shot the records show that shot back this all happened in a matter of is that courts have used to take a look at or in determining whether multiple elements are more charges on the same set of facts some of those factors as i had indicated in the brief include whether there was an
the next is this morning he's all of the state of illinois versus christian  for future conduct in the places last you know the time and his social isolation but they still in effect there's no opinion on what would occur if he was taken out of school or set it right to be honest the second one secretary that was some discussion if i remember correctly that he would probably become more social i squinted and maybe revert back to that but you know that a good been addressed through for you know what i have i guess i'm more experienced with this where you know the graduate you know have to report every day they don't take in the haitian state can file a petition all the way you know it's very you know  think you know big issue is here in the state would like the street view my car you know manifest weight of evidence but the state didn't present any clear evidence about control conduct about future
have nothing to do with the post conviction context and what here you are saying here we're talking about the process fair process for the scientists to get an adequate judgment from the judge about whether or not input from the state or relied on the state's motion on the record shows in fact th he's found it very very actions and all that and given the state an opportunity to come in sharp in the issues and indeed defendants here were required he gave his best evidence of what he thought he joining significance here to the fact i believe the defendant filed a response to the state's objection is that correct that is fair does that have any effect on the analysis no no your honor
oh no we haven't thirteen thirteen year not counting the holds and paul going up don't tell me i didn't see it move that time turning the adjusting screws until the images are superimposed you get an automatic reading in yards on the scale without any mathematical figuring you're going to whether you can even get anyone to look at it they got plans for a soldier i don't know that salutes pretty phony i get by well you had better if you're caught impersonating a soldier twenty years it's worth the risk and we got that rangefinder well i talked to the hillbilly not talk to cooper up to washington whether we win will depend a lot on the type of country we operate in but what do you base your theory the army has twice as many tanks as we head yes but we offset that with words it's not me you're exhausted my patience i've done everything possible to make a soldier out of you but you'll never make it i'm a comin down here and you're sending me home y i came up in the car and get that pack still write but i'd be doing it for the general nobody can get up to a wearing khaki breeches or to me
what kind of evidence that can be that can
was something above the minimum so long as that minimum is not a life term here that if she could have given a lot you know hundred years but so long is that like trying to seventy six years she does not have the discretion to go below that mandatory minimum life discretion to exceed the minimum but just it's the minimum that is unconstitutional here the judge has no discretion to consider those mitigating factors of his youth that that his family background those factors that are cited in no or that a certain t reckon got her there she stayed on the record that the fact that he was the shooter and he left the scene those are the two factors she cited but she never discussed his youth or his family background or any of the other factors of a note or required that the circuit cour but still the court still has to take into account his use that the current the circumstances the offense in your describing as an execution however he was here there's evidence and record that shows that he was he was on he was under the pressure or under the not saying that the court cannot take that into account but the court must be able to take into account his you his background on the circumstances defense and be able to impose a sentence that is not a life sentence he or she has no miller's alabama that only applies to juveniles that does not partake in europe and one thousand year old in that instance would maybe we be arguing that the sentence is excessive you know based on the circumstances that eighteen or nineteen year old offender but here we have a juvenile we have a minor  seventy six your son it's a mandatory life term the president so and the trial judge followed the legislature here the defendant to see interested in bench trial he was found guilty of the charged offenses the charged offenses carry mandatory minimums he was also charged with being of the person who personally discharged the weapon that resulted in death and great bodily harm and they was found guilty of that and then the statute requires that mandatory and on and finally because there was great bodily harm involved there was a crime and that the terms be served only consecutively and it was a convergence of the statutes that ended up in the sentence that he has that does not make the statutes unconstitutional the reason this wasn't brought up low was because of course nobody below considered him to be a juvenile he was seventeen years old until january twenty fourth team he was considered to be an adult and treated as an adult the trial judge followed the law to them that the sentence is not unconstitutional if our supreme court has been dealing with this issue in the context in which it more often comes up which would be a person under the age of seventeen discharge and this from court as recently again in october after this case was reached in the context of a  fourteen years of up and then a life sentence without possibility of parole was available sentence and available sentence to the circuit court based on the use of the firearm for the first degree murder offense she did not get and that sentence she gave in fourteen years but the minimum
but also studying the process itself and how it works
they're over talking to the score right now the tap was one initially by reading and then they realized that it was an error they gave the ball to belmont which created this confusion so on the next to change you will be writing to use the ball down co when the ball goes out of bounds on the the basket that you currently observing it almost rolls all don't watch advantages that they have three or four players that are capable of setting the basket on fire with their three point shooting among them would be  as you may observe over behind discovery's table is a big sign that says welcome coach lions coach paul lyons who was the varsity basketball coach at belmont twenty five years and  on i think he bumped into the shooter is probably the strongest rebound around that's a very good soccer player i'm on is ranked number one and they are the only team for the middlesex league in the top twenty a little bit of time to get gathered to put up the shot while the defense to close on her first person lawns a guy me and the third team fall on reading rockets came on and puts up the first one and good second one up and no good when mellie and the other players that are wearing number twenty turns and i quite facing me i can't pick up the numbers all the time and i don't know their personalities well enough like i do  field house we have a good crowd on hand tonight attracted by this ceremony i'm sure is an influence and getting more players here is here i would say reading has maybe a few more all hands at tonight's game will soon be into the playoff season and the belmont media center will be looking forward to playing the playoff games to you typically were not allowed by the m i a to test them  live but we'll get them on the to was soon as we can so a little less than a half of a period to go down the line to has a twenty one day the  geo and we have a time out all my takes time out there up thirty five twenty two a little less than a half of the period third period life he did team appears to be in fall trouble body and and there are three fellows on reading so far already won twenty five reached in and got it i'm rather than the ball trying to create a tie up my body working around the outside pushed by number three no question that reading is pushing the belmont players but getting away with it so we have one thirty six to go and eleven point lead for belmont following this game there will be a ceremony naming this mass major are mas main basketball court a field house the coach lions caught he and his family are here this evening to be a part of the ceremony three daughters two sons and a beautiful wife more  are always bounce around and grab and twenty one pushes and the ball is picked up by go got her hand on her all in number three pushing and we have a foul on look on you comes back into the game and got home one in the circle and don't want to give up the ball ellis era we have a fifty one thirty nine game with fifty one seconds to go
hey did you just more minute walter that's just what i want to find out just anybody with me say wait a minute i think this was a trick to get us out  could have done it our posters don't believe it why but what about these men these private detectives they almost speak for themselves do you think if stevens life had actually been threatened he would have called in three more on such as these for protection i was going to get two hundred for two thousand dollars and at the same time let him get
case as it were pointed out of next to a case imposing liability in the household situation can result in limitless there is no principle or logical way t and the lack of relationship between the pla there are other companies who also were negligent or conspired they coffee and that's not the purpose for which the evidence was offered wouldn't say these other companies were part of a conspiracy they weren't we say our public was like strong evidence of respectfully we think if you look at the evidence in this case earth to the evidence the supreme court said it was sufficient for me for a defendant it's the same evidence in the sense that there was evidence of the relationships was evidence of association we're just turning whether to recognize or do you do have to look at the ramifications you don't look at just this particular case if you look at the ramifications from a common law perspective of whether this is it it should be recognized realizing the courts have to appl
where do you think the actual malice w johnson o
the criteria was the fear all trains crossing at a crossing and if you have a double threat cross and so in other words of strangers coming from the north and one coming from the south the train from the north multiple states we have states and some states having different types of warning devices and some states have a different warning device we need uniformity and been basically this is a highway to install  in this case yes regardless of what mr steed recommends the commission is required to enter the order before and that is the regulatory scheme that is what spelled all