desired operating range for the appliances the gas appliances inside the home when he was in the process of inspecting and replacing single state regulators with safer to stage regulators before was the fact that they should have known that the copper tubing to which they connect to the tank was unsupported or inadequately braced in violation of the code and if i can just refer per and they had to connect it to the copper underneath the trailer where it was not adequately priest that's the defect it's not just a matter of whether they had notice of a leak it's whether they have notice place inside the leak was inside because of the strain on the tool be it came from underneath the trailer when brown turned the valve to shut off the gas that was going to the range inside so so i guess it's going to go up to the furnace and it ignites two days later we're not exactly sure why he did it it could be from a lower fan it could be from a timer it's but it clearly ignited after there was efficient to insist that he couldn't know he couldn't possibly know what you know what this the choice was a ninety four but you just put it together they never reply and they know they connected up to a c its fifteen year service life a jury could find that would he should have known that the stock standard piping also needed to be changed went into the leak check of the system if not cause of the explosion with the piping wouldn't be that gas suppliers are assumed to are reasonable to believe that haiti is safe for the gas that is coming into the house or mobile home when he would have had no reason to explosion did would he ever inspect the piping so i apologize i am so really hard of hearing so i'm going to say what i'm sorry i'm sorry prior to the explosion  never inspected it at all when he had a contract to supply propane to the tag outside the mobile home and it did that and the last time into it that was in september no problem arms they go on their merry way their contract does not require them to inspect anything not even the tank to the extent they did that they did that just your argument seems to be that your pronouncements and conclusions and then when we take a supposition he had to back out and he you know had to admit that he has no way to get out if the regulator failed heard it failed because the regulator doesn't exist because it doesn't really mean it's unsafe because i'm testing him regulators that are forty and fifty years old that function perfectly fine so age does not equate i say the fact is it's not if you don't know well it allowed gas to come into the mobile home ok i'm pretty sure that's what the point of the tank and regular is to let gas into the house all right that doesn't mean that the regulator cause explosion the unfortunate situation is that we have an explosion and nobody knows why there was a leak by the furnace now mr brown when he left town to go to florida the other thing i just wanted to point out was about the warnings so that's another thing that mr time retractor time he said that we should have all of these propane tanks that we are warnings have all of those go should have known about them be honest and warn them of all sorts of other things that the law doesn't require one to you or any other propane supplier to provide a laundry list of about we don't know she's passed away at the daughter said she doubted that she grabbed mornings so ill and i was as unless we unless somebody prevents somebody from reading a warning th fair question for the jury what they should have done and whether whether they were negligent in failing to did he say where you had to be in order to see what was clearly visible  he was done was clearly qualified is an expert in his opinions were based on his review of the testimony and photographs he had the photographs of this shown us there isn't any physical evidence i did not hear counsel say one