we'll be ready when you  this condition now parts the question is does he she in that portion of the population of know mitt romney or is she in the other fifty percent that was what i understood the special master to be trying to decide in this case ninety eight percent of the total population did not have positive results on the very objective test that the special master insisted so that obviously some portion of that the few percent had to not have objective prayer from the it's a form of peripheral neuropathy so when you say autonomic neuropathy without peripheral involvement you're not saying autonomic neuropathy that is not a type of peripheral neuropathy the classic i was trying to sort through through the testimony there there are a court of the study about thirty percent of the past patients have autonomic neuropathy and then and also because by just a few other as i understand  especially mr in the case analyzed all the record evidence the medical testimony and the testing that was done in this case and use close to a finding of fact that is whether or not the petitioners alleged logical sequence of cause and piece of evidence in isolation really would be a disservice to the special master if he didn't just consider that piece of evidence he considered not only the test results were for normal but also the simple apology that the petitioner did not exhibit which the true that ninety eight percent or whatever percentage the claimant petitioners counsel asserts had no significant signs of objective testing yet the results of that study still concluded and this is undisputed that upwards  that caused several of which were discounted in her and her circle and if there is a burden here and the question is if you get over fifty percent or not right in the special mr this case look at not only that article but also the testing under the treating physician and the conclusions of the treating physicians of those test results dr freeman particular a treating physician who is not only a treating physician he's demonstrated the record to be one of the percent of the people that have this condition it's caused by that actually let's just assume you have a fifty fifty percent of your claim that has the condition at and she comes in and she that she doesn't have any of the conditions altered that are alternative and any of the alternative causes for the complaint condition that would make up she's either in the fifty percent for sure but but she's in the fifty percent because she's not in the forty five percent and that these are with a fifty versus five percentage the evidence is so overwhelming that a finder of fact to do that and this is not the facts of this case so what going back what are the indications we have numerous opportunities to objective the test dysfunction in the nervous system in the testimony in this case it is highly unlikely that you would receive these normal test despite the the in the opening article th could it could be consistent with it if not now there were there were i was going to ask this is getting really specific and and there may be an explanation for this i noticed that  thirty nine that doesn't look like it was included in that list that was one of the wanted which the test was terminated because she felt that it was exaggerated  thing is that to look at the environmental possibilities with respect to cars so why not considering the temple relations temporal relationship as part of the overall  credibility determinations unless there's a wholly unbelievable or or or are irrational based on the record are subject to an arbitrary and capricious standard of review in the court of federal claims on review concluded that the special master evaluation was not arbitrary and capricious whether or not a fact finder good evaluated this record and come up with a conclusion pomeranz is not the question the question is whether this special master on this of telling the record before him stated that if one were to assume that there was an auto immune mediated illness that it would take up eight days or so to manifest that is not say the same that we have read her dysautonomia had its onset within that period of time