undisputed real life problems of the american people where there is presumed ongoing concrete direct and or consequential harm to same for which i have already provided sufficient initial remedies awaiting this disposal of self interest should be interpreted in light of this with it being obvious that compulsory division were substandard resolution has not been waived and unlike united states female juvenile my objections  case and in simple terms the court should say now you mentioned it will give the people there when as to a more proactive and preemptive united states supreme court that part of the ball has evidently already made it into the end zone as indicated by a novel recent proactive and preemptive announcement by the united states supreme court the only thing left to amend is actually greetings to the post judgment were post announcement for the fine tuning of the totally universe we uncontested substandard remedies to further equal protection due process and civil peace create conditions earnings and deterrence and limitations on ramage to get the job done this thankfully spark a district court and develop superfluid sleep during the present case with the integrity of the other branches being torn to shreds going aground was perceived as an pietschmann and a groundless election context for example the judicial branch has the opportunity to restore some integrity to the federal government and government in general in this case and others ok i take it your position is that you now have to show that you personally suffered such an injury and usually in federal court you but i take it that that's not your position maybe it will i think i'm sorry for correct me if i'm not on it's it's actually either or in other words what i'm saying is that people that are injured can bring selfish actions and you know a personal stake essentially selfish but in this case it's all about selflessness it's not about me it's about getting the people served where the branches of  blue what i'm saying is that people need a safety valve this is when as we see through the failures of the branches and also where through the document you'll see really explain how the branches have failed to serve the interests of the people in so many other circumstances where the street evolves also serves another purpose it serves the purpose of one filling in the boards that the other branches have been building and it a nd amendment right to peacefully exercise in the federal courts and because we gave you this we're going to lausanne it with now what we could would consider to be reasonably sufficient gun control laws which don't exist and and hopefully that would be in the form of names in wide uniform gun control was with no independent state grounds this was enable our society to become imminent harm it's there somewhere whether it's direct concrete injury or whether it's consequential injury because as we d know this stuff spills all over society and  what happened at the capitol is is is quite disappointing this recent events that i foresee as i was saw on many things that are in the paper we're going back almost a decade and i believe i've covered all the pieces even previous to this or logging appreciate everybody's time as you probably already know don't forget that the focus of this case should be interested in the american