middle of the artist now they have in the past twelve months prior to when they started dating in august which is the critical time because the judge found that set a found that that was she what she called the tipping point a tipping point she for three and a half months it was a new relationship to the extent that they had made what if your goal wasn't that turned out to be a commitment to one another in this quote months before august of two thousand and seventeen they had dated for two months out of the twelve miles they had started dating at the end of two thousand and fifteen they broke up after a couple months because of  stand whether you were together every night and maybe you were together every night the bottom line is well wasn't with her every night will would come by at two in the morning when he thinnish the shift instances he denies that he reacted in this way only to after we made our cross examination that's why i think the record did important because it shows what his initial statements are and it shows with really happened eventually does after the surgery for short time they he's helping her supposedly your mother or father or health care but the bottom line is she didn't want him over and then she gets add additional information about the relation that he's having so why he was called by little by the responding who filed the petition i don't know what background there is between them i don't know whether he just wasn't prepared whether he was just guessing whether that bottom line is when we get down to what the truth is versus what he said we see that this isn't a council type relationship they're not together every night they're having their and fifteen i'm sure they had a couple break ups the link of those it would depend on who who was more credible whether it was that they were up the whole summer or they were really kind of still together maybe going on dates with others but it was a two and a half year he store personal items there which is a significant factor the susan case that they did not have any evidence that they had any personal belongings on each of those once you had in this case there is ample evidence in a motorcycle that was there in fact to receive mail regarding   nd factor that they share a day to day existence the course also look at the nature of the activities incubation again they grocery shop together he did household chores he motor her yard she david asked a question regarding that in relation of their personal affairs and i will agree with mr pinto if there was no evidence that they had a joint checking account or that you know they changed the beneficiaries however that is not the deciding factor on area that was in related was finances driver's license and vehicle registration and the child's school right destruction but in all other aspects their lives were and are being open and that is the case in this case rd lies were intermingled that that was because he had children and that they were going to be living together maybe coming gave and that house well the car classifies that he was going to begin making financial contributions in the future and once again only on off nine months after the relationship end the house that is another factor that you should take into account when you're looking at whether or not their lives are interrelated they have a serious relationship this was not like the miller case this was much more than an other factors we've discussed we have that he's spending too much every night to gather that he's on exercising his parenting time in her house that he is having lunch with who got their dinners together that they ain't a count but if you look at in the modern age is that even in most marriages do people always share a bank account so it would be nice something more and that they were having lunches together grocery shopping together sharing household chores all of these factors show that maybe they weren't sharing a bank account but there is an implied you know you assistance there on he had stopped his cable at his house he bought the moving van to move her into the new house  albany street so there is evidence that they were sharing some financial financial systems to each other but in that is a nothing with the case on to support that factor that they had that and relationship new not they went to the wisconsin dolls they also travel to his parents with his children or his mom with his two children for to celebrate christmas one year they spent holidays with her family easter and a video that was taken after her surgery showing will the car going to the house and all of the street and his you know farm with his hands they go in the house minutes passed they come out he's changed he's changed his clothing he didn't carry other than book bags he didn't carry clothing in there he comes out no with his kids probably because this period of time had had it had ended but on it was well after the surgery the state she said that regarding how it was sent to julian and when she had it so you must place we will see how some of the she received it she became angry and she was telling him what to say because she knew that