simplify issues in a complex case and thanks to my surgeons my health team and my amazing boys aged nine and thirteen who helped me to be here today for full disclosure this court hears the finest orators i apologize that's not me i had no lawyer assist in my briefing but based on past claims of theft i do want to retain all rights to my work product my image my voice my private health information and i assume all judiciary and clerks screenings for conflicts of interest have occurred but let's be clear after twenty one causes of action were dismissed on a rule twelve b six motion we have to be clear lackadaisical lawyers failed to file to appear in the southern district of new york or they filed with the facts so all filings are considered invalid and there stryper the cipher authority for defendants is in controversy that would infer that defendants are pro se pursuant to twenty eight u code sections sixteen fifty four no answer to my complaint on the twenty one causes of actions triggers a default judgment of which to have been entered and we're looking at the claims of ongoing discriminatory benefits system where i was under paid a time of hire and unpaid since july seventh because the person that perpetuated the terminations did not have authority to terminate me therefore swiss swiss reason trance financial strength is in jeopardy by legal scoundrels who turns us advocacy to any fiction from the division of human rights reply that had no valid answer to falsifying my work record suppressing proof and having for been communications with the a j administrative law judge there's no veracity to those proceedings because even the hearing was held out of time and they didn't waive the defect so when why are we here today on a rule twelve b six motion we're not supposed to be arguing fa because of court malfeasance in the southern district of new york there was a dereliction of duty as of the staff to review by fax as having ferocity and being truthful they didn't do that they adopted the division of human rights finding facts they took they stepped into the shoes of the defendants completely in contrary to what it true rule twelve b six motion is as a whistleblower i took on an executive role to protect the interests financial strength rating of swiss re i named solutions human resources rejected that i spent years in the trenches working from v p up to the global head of credit risk management in asset management surance business the largest and most profitable part of the company and the gangs of individuals that retaliate me with demotions job limitations all lead to the pretext for discrimination on my terminations so again to review what i'm asking for relief is to vacate the june twenty two thousand six hundred invalid judgment it wasn't signed even by the a new judge activate my turn causes of action and her default judgment and give the right to amend the complaint because i was denied that right in the southern district of new york i would be adding a naming john doe's and also looking at privacy violations i did enter into the docket a memo of law that outlined extensive privacy rights were by the circuit courts tend to look at disclosure over the rights of privacy that is upheld by the supreme court so it encourages you to look at joint appendix forty which is docket number eighty three because of the fact that denied sought to deny privilege defied my cease and desist order request i should say and they made an authorized hit parade disclosures in the scream court of new york and in the southern district of new york not an acted by someone with authority over me so i technically an unpaid employee for the past seven years i've suffered through yes i'm un paid because the person have authority i didn't even know this person didn't know anything about credit risk he relied on much on me shaka granted delegated work to me i was doing work for the executive committee i wasn't i was the worker bee and because many people left to take more money at other organizations the disparity but deal with it or they just missed it i wrote complaints i asked for salary review look at peers look at comps let me have a job transfer they start threatening my job they were taking way responsibilities because effectively they brought in people during hiring freeze they didn't give me the opportunity and i was more qualified c f a m b a to undergraduate degrees nearly twenty years of experience and they brought in people with no reinsurance experience i was the in house expert for reinsurance and that's why they relied on me so much and so these jobs came open while i was on maternity leave wasn't even considered wasn't offered i was at an e c minus two level executive committee minus two christian movement dollars worked with him directly but they brought in people disease diagnosis i did find the statistics they have to look at the e e o c twenty nine c f r section sixteen thirty two h one as well as j three point three the lower court said you have to be violence against women's act they kept argument there's no right of action individual right of action but that's not true it's only prohibited on torts limited to government agency awards granted to the attorney general and the office of the against women this is between private parties it's not prohibited against individuals and i have named individuals under forty two u s c chapter one thirty six sub chapter three section one four zero four three f it only thirty five every person has the right to manage their own cases and lawyers have the right by permission so i really am a strong advocate that in bringing these cases before the court there's there's