part of the focus of the judge sure in randolph county there were fourteen contradictions between what mr anderson testified to and what his medical records state but moving even farther back in anderson's ability to work after such a severe accident he said no i don't think he would have been able to in this case mr anderson did he continue to ship to testify that he came in early attentions or promote living to seven the accident was at three he worked four more hours so you have that initial problem with this that this whole case he then goes in for treatment at the emergency room and when he gets to emergency room they take an x ray he tells them he's never had any prior trouble with this need but amazingly there isn't the x ray that they are able to compare the new x ray to which there is absolutely no difference between the two films the one was taken in march of two thousand and five and the there was no bruising there was no swelling there was no evidence of any injury when mr anderson presents to dr courts three days later no bruising he goes in and tells dr for car it was really swollen before it was swollen eyes at the hospital the hospital records say there was no swelling and then even dr course looks at the knee and says there's no swelling there's no acute injury evident here and basically we're known regard to this accident is different from what he testified to then you get into the problem with document moments testimony dr mcmillan didn't see him after the accident dr mcmillan was not treating for the accident dr mcclelland specifically testified i'm the doctor stated that he came in and said that he hit his knee on a towbar and that's what they all said when they they had no reason to dispute it but what you find is that he also says i've never had any problems with my knee which amazingly have to go all the back to two thousand and one with them you know taking a film a year earlier comparing it to the new film and finding nothing different so where you where you  is if all of these doctors are relying on what mr anderson is telling them that mystery understand is not telling them the absolute accuracy of all the statements then the house of cards is not going to keep standing up knee replacement there should be some evidence that you actually hit your knee on something and in this case there was no swelling no bruising expertise or the same and there's no question that you know when your bone on bone which is besides him going in and saying hey this happened but there is and that was the whole problem with that and then you end up with all the contradiction there no physical manifestation not at all however again that was disputing messages that there was top of that you have all the contradictions that come in with what mr anderson testified as opposed to what was in his medical records he's testifying that he worked hard and it's a he gave it all the physical therapy no he didn't they said his efforts were minimal and he basically got this charge because he wasn't doing what they asked him if he'd come in and say oh my niece won't look at his name wasn't swollen and this goes on through the course of history and if you look if you go back to this is all riding on the fact that mr anderson supposedly hit his knee so hard that he was in pain that was ten i have a ten but can work the rest of the ship show up for medical treatment but no evidence of any injury three days later there's no proof i mean i'll give you their might on been a function and may not even know they have arthritis and then there's an accident and then the triggers an exacerbation of the conditions was only evidence and terry mcmillan on the point oh that's that's that's factual evidence there's no question about that but the and the record reveals that mr mr anderson was an asymptomatic i mean he was getting treatment personally albeit it wasn't two days before the accident i mean i it's not that subtle but if you look at the records from when he went in in march of two thousand and five he's complaining of the exact same thing he's complaining about except there's no tomo this time it's the inside of his name and the reason it her was because he was when he'd stand up from sitting his knee  commission's decision what would your response no response to the question is there is evidence in the record to support the decision however the manifest weight of the evidence standard medical treatment albeit he said i hit my knee on a comb over there was no evidence to indicate an actual and in fact the evidence was to the contrary because the film of this taken over a year before his  not telling the truth from fourteen gave credit when you do well i would start with taking a look at each individual instance of the alleged natural coming and see how it plays out in the context of everything else