and one other question before we get to the statutory interpretation part of the relief that you request is that we declare the election for white what authority have you given us and what argument have you made to in your brief with philosophical conflict it was the one between the two regulations supreme court said no there's nothing wrong with having two bodies tell someone what they can or cannot do because they have to again keep going back to this condition precedent to even get to the point where they can even ask for the tax to run the ambulance service and yours situation it sounds like there are conflicting ordinances  throughout the district they were there certainly in a position to be able to make that decision it does not say that the statute or in the injust regulations but certainly they would be in a position to notify someone and i statutory language and now the st line of section twenty two dollars it does say board of trustees and i'm not reading all of that is authorized under the terms and conditions here and after set out believe  of public policy and so doesn't that inform how we are to read a twelve dollars and three dollars and if that's the case how do we account for what you just talked on how is that three alone just a term and condition and isn't three part of the st line of pain which means it's policy and r should be in the intent to an adequate and i'm reading from three and continuing emergency ambulance services do not exist fire protection district should be and again same into should be should be again that policy as opposed to a requirement is it not so if it's just policy how can it be a precondition and i guess i can i can only imagine that maybe with the question of i mean no disrespect by that at all but if that those are the terms and conditions then what those offers under the terms and conditions here never set out just there wouldn't be any conditions i don't believe they would just say whatever they want to trustees of the district desires it shall certify and then you know they go on to be more specific so why wouldn't that be possible it doesn't say in the st line under all the terms and conditions here and after set out i guess one could infer that logically would be the ones that would apply and  but i've never represented a fire protection district myself but i've had conversations of the three while it might it's an observation it's not a recommendation it would seem that there are some issues with this line so what would happen is you're going to have this go through fire district three would be carved out and you're going to have all this fire standing they go all the way to the wisconsin were well so you would have a possibly but we don't we've got i haven't seen any regulations or limiting language other than the original word this for all more of your time so you'll have a chance to make for an opportunity see my clients have been running ambulance services for fighting period of time the more ambulance services that are available can certainly not printer saying you know they're they're coming into our car or our territory we there are already in the territory so what are they what is the the additional injury that they're revenue to subsidize what you've been doing for something that's exactly right what about the part about women team other ambulance services being our public agencies are n has submitted its levy on the basis of period it covers and now that's going to be covered additionally by district three that would that could impact their ability to l ok as much money in taxes oh no way i honestly i don't think so if the voters don't want to pay double taxes here bill and services they will vote down the referendum somebody is is going to get double taxed as opposed to tires area i got the impression it was for her that there are areas where there is double coverage there there are some areas where there are double disagree about about a certain situation but it's the majority of the voters here so the majority of the voters feel like they would be better served by having to try districts that are serving their territory then they will vote for that taxiing there's a keeper in taxiing and there's district three taxing because if you're already providing services there must be something on the books already how does that not provide an interest to two like you know as a pilot he is trying to do the same work and the fact that one is doing the work and one is not doing the work does not harm the other one  you're right maybe maybe that taxation will be a little bit different if there's a manic station down the road but they can double tax in the end he certainly areas so the do you agree with you do you agree and that this case is moot a good idea and so how can we overturn an election that has been completed with the result certified i don't believe you you don't believe there are some public interest here with respect to the stand you need for interpretation for public officials in the future has he said globally there's a there's a general  brings that out how do you want to point out how and why you think it's a church clear yeah i don't i don't believe there's any ambiguity i think it was written and i can own it doesn't even inform this decision so you're saying indeed when ever the board of trustees desires to levy a tax it can do it it does not have to be informed at least by three that is whether adequate in continuing emergency ambulance services do not exist doesn't have to be with reference to anything the sick or there's no no no i don't agree with that if it is it is a big undertaking for a small fire protection district like this to operate any of dillon's emergency ambulance services so certainly they consider they the district considers what is going on in their district response times geographic issues on a population growth there's a number of things that are that they are going to consider and if they feel that the population and once they make that decision they can act on it now or that decision it doesn't need to be proven there's no process in the staff to prove that there's going to administrative process there's no criteria for geographic times response times or anything along those those lines but of course the district itself is going to take that into consideration how well this doesn't then aren't you really talking about the referendum is it's an authorised to levy a new tax wouldn't he have some concern me shit you're already doing it but what's the purpose of a new tax wouldn't they want that's what we we have here now the new tax is to expand this ambulance service on so there's been a and so there's been some determination by the district some need that they have identified and that is why they are seeking this new tax but they've not made it public statements in support of this referendum that there is in adequate service i don't know i believe that i believe it was very well publicized that when i reviewed the statute also popped into my mind relative to ok how do you limit the services because there doesn't seem to be much in here relative to what they're supposed