client the opportunity to actually comply with that regulation and get inside his client hard and pursue a grievance procedure i think you made three of them and neither then nor to this day correct the question he wanted his boss and the grave and the officials kept telling him well show us you've got ninety days i don't know where that comes from bottom right here you know where the money's come from i would appreciate your telling me but anyway they all seem to recognize that it was ninety  correction officer why why they're telling me i need to fill out this form getting within ninety days to officer merino is telling me that i had no chance of getting these votes fact they were gone i just they were destroyed long ago so by the time he's working his way up through this grievance process his understanding based upon what officer they came from a qualified publisher or retailer he hard no right to the books even though the subject matter was religious and i'm not moral i'm not into quibbling not to whether it was  well recognized place within his and i think he didn't accept this only i can see that he never filed anything saying these are from an authorized source his position is that to do that so it's to spend money and time writing these people getting them to provide whatever documentation regulation point one point six it stands and make me receive prepaid publications mail directly from the publisher slash retailer there's no mention in that regulation about from a religious organization on the other hand and i'm now an  religious organization now i couldn't find religious organization in britain regulations but it appears that the regulations that ministers such that if it comes from a religious organization they're ok that is my understanding and again from the record it's unclear as to how that interplay game works between the two or whether it's religious or authorized recognized publishers the impression that mr security had is that you know if he can establish that it is a religious institution exactly where they came from that's true that's not something that's been very central on this i feel there is evidence in the record that at some point mr is the greatest contender that routinely do come with that type of documentation and assume for purposes of this question that's why is he not qualified immunity on the ground he could not it was not was not unreasonable for him to think that maybe he was not interfering with the use of the first amendment right or  denying him that speech without a legitimate you know logical interest would violate both the first amendment and later on the religious land use and it's like personal stuff i think that much is clear where those and i don't think we can further inquiry of how much of that kind of quantitative basis he has to get it through and he can't just rolling in and i cor protected speech to a person without a legitimate interest which even the existence of this very regulation having a procedure protecting that that speech and those materials the allegation is marina entitled qualified immunity interpreted but the way that the and this is in the record also that when he wrote to his counselor correctional officer three pain pain wrote back to him and said we're not going to destroy it i spoke to officer marino in the mail room and it will not be explain to him it wasn't apparent on the envelope that this was it appeared to come from an individual needed to come and religious organization and you have until the disposition date in order to come up with documentation there was nothing in that package indicating that it came from a religious organization we do not know why don't we have that i thought this was what like like al gore it appears that way but that's inconsistent with what the enemy as when the enemy says that officer marina was talking to them about being a terrorist and this right after nine eleven everybody knows as to whether or not once they know once we can decide whether or not we thought really was from al gore well at that point we can decide whether they thought that it was protected activity which is i think leon less and less qualified immunity but that's a disputed fact and he made a point to her and when she wrote back to him she said it appears to be from an individual so that was her perception as well and if she could have believed that she was a she was an officer also i think