not he it was determined that the persecution he had said there was no persecution so we just did you have to the other two points and if we were to say well the record appears to indicate that there was persecution but compel the finding of past persecution and this court should find its must in regards to the the issue of internal relocation although the government has speeded that the court can look to the case in the quietest case cited by the government in the reset twelve the fourteen and eighteen to twenty all stand for the proposition if they have any viability after the regulations that will probably be needed in one nine hundred ninety if they have any viability though maybe it seems that there's something a little bit less going on because that i just i think there is some comment that he doesn't know too much about the party that he's allegedly was the p r t here i guess the p r g he didn't know that much about it but still i mean having four close family members killed that are members of this party and the end since he is assumed credible and that there's there's testimony to the effect that that there's a relationship of the opposition party being responsible for these killings the third you know you don't have to be an attempted murder on yourself if it's everyone around you and that's going on you're out of the government would submit that there's a difference between sort of accepting his subjective assessment of the situation which will grant is credible and actually drawing the inference that he doesn't know why these these acts happen that we didn't cite which is that two fifty four after a fifty nine involved credible accusations by a mother and daughter of rape they said it was on the account of political opinions this court said that while it agreed that the with you but it becomes more difficult with everyone that gets killed you know that's when you have one rape and one assumption about that with four people and it gets more difficult i agree or i think that there's record evidence did b i a decision does not say that if this court were going to have to sort of go beyond i go to the i j a decision and look at the nexus question i think that i would direct you to those portions the record also when when it depends if this if this court finds that this was towards past persecution but we would say that the past persecution is more a bit of an individualized assessment and that you would look at when on site did they really do that i guess that's the whole thing if you assume that for family members for account he says that that was by the p r i and he said the p r game that he had south was beaten and i think he said it had to hide out or you know there were things along those lines well if  is that it was a family squabble and this is what really happened you would be in a better position but they don't say that green growth and again and it goes to the question of whether or not we consider the violence against the family as  they did discuss relocation but that it's not really developed and i think it's i guess i think after the tour this court would probably be reluctant to find in our favor on this but i do think it's developed here you have indications that his mother and sisters have been able to relocate safely is would fall in that category you also have the circumstances that of the two thousand election when mr fox was elected in the p r eyes no longer no longer in power so i think those things together would thank you for the questions thank you over a fourteen year period or fifteen year period we've got four relatives being killed or close relatives being killed got physical visible harm happening to leave teacher we've got i'm going to threats over ongoing specific threats over a long period of time we've got