insurance certainly in terms of interpretation of the statute should be given but i always tell my kids you know that different should always be given first the truth and then to any precedence  progressive self paying system what first and c s r s wanted to do from the very beginning is they wanted to encourage productivity they didn't want people to simply get disability annuities and then simply sit back and enjoy  and there's this there's a concern through distinction let me just try to explain why and during that forty five month period there's the initial nine month period of entitlement where the social security disability insurance we sippin received both social work you're not losing you're not to ignore them off that when he was getting benefits in those first nine months it was the onset for perhaps and there's no disagreement about that first time and now we go to the second thirty six months with social security is essentially saying is you don't get your social security and or your disability insurance and because you continue to engage in substantial gains like to know in any month however they are taking what the person is making receiving actually receiving and asons offsetting what the person should be using or could be receiving as intitled to social security  actually receiving ads because we're going to turn use the term that social security uses of jury up in title even though you're not actually receiving it and we're going to offset your radical non receding social security is doing which opium is not the social security is taking the actual we see in the private sector jobs and essentially offsetting that and saying we're not giving you social security disability insurance because you make one o p m is taking that same argument and saying well you know you're not actually receiving it we're still going on interestingly enough and i kno the theoretical structure and i'm not conceding the essence of what the term entitlement means one instantly saying is that on its face social security certainly use that for possible policy consideration could drive that distinction made i mean right i mean you're eligible if you're if you're not me when we say that you're entitled or not he's not receiving the nightmare because every month they might have to go off and on and off and on but that's the system if i would agree but i'm just saying in fact medical real terms i'm not sure whether or not how do home what percentage of the population would actually you're going to put into it so that if you apply for social security you can put new a little effort in because all that is required under the bird statute is a receipt showing that you fi you don't have to put much effort into it when social security asks for further information printed you don't have to supply the old and the young you'll get a denial letter and you can then submit that you know that are two zero zero pm and will say you've satisfied spiraling a federal employee is going to say to themselves well i can't do my particular federal job can i do something else if i can do something else then in all likelihood i really don't want to because i i am not conceding the term in title and there is a period of silence but it is interesting for instance in the appendix essay three that social security it and that is in order to be entitled you're receiving something if you're not receiving something then you're not really in final two you must be in a period of entitlement or whatever else you're not receiving into you're not entitle to