diagnosed with schizophrenia in his mid twenty's which is typically when schizophrenia is diagnosed in particularly in males when he was having most of the symptoms hearing the voices of god and the devil hallucinations and this was reported by his father to the psychiatrist he was prompted to go see a doctor with medication and a strong anti psychotic medications the overt symptoms the psychotic symptoms seem to have been alleviated for the most part with the exception of some paranoia however he was left with a lot of the negative symptoms the apathy the social withdrawal and this ended up being a battle for him  throughout the record of trying the psychotic medications becoming very lethargic and withdrawing going off the medications and having a psychotic symptoms including paranoia it appears  primary reason for rejecting the soul treating psychiatry just opinion and according to social security's regulations there were lots of reasons why this particular medical starts wasn't intitled to great weight if not controlling weight  yes he came up with three of the past relevant jobs that mr ford had performed in the past the first fire watch and what's involved in a fire watch is watching a welder and making sure that nothing around the welder catches fire it's and job and mr floyd he was almost obsessively intense and going back to work tried to do this job again and he fell asleep when he was fired he also tried to work as a fast food grill clerk which he had done in the past at mcdonald's he was he was fired from that job as well if he was unable to perform that job the reasons mental illness or the reasons a little bit different he was getting into arguments with his coworkers and supervisors and he was having a lot of problems with pace which is very significant limitation in this case because most of the types of jobs that we're looking at unskilled  which don't involve a lot of contact with others would involve some amount of production or pace work and he was unable to do that he tried twice he worked at kentucky fried chicken and he worked at mcdonald's and in both cases he was testified yes he testified that this is why he was fired he was fired because he couldn't keep up with the work and the administrative law judge at step four is required to consider the testimony of the claimant and he didn't he didn't consider it he didn't seem to consider that at all which is the third error that i was hoping to address the step for finding has requires a lot of very specific  findings you can't just say the administrative law judge judge can't just say the individual can go back and perform this work he has to make certain findings yes to determine whether it's substantial against the activity and in order for a job to be anything mr floyd was overstating of symptoms was pretending to be doing better than he was doing in fact which is a problem in this case and doctoring means the examining psychologist thought that this case should be developed a little bit room so that it could be determined and including interviews with parents or other people in mr flight's life to determine what is the exactly experiencing because he has a tendency to deny the hallucinations and the delusion treating psychiatrist and the consultative examiners opinion that it can't be said that there was substantial evidence to support the administrative law judges decision in this case rejected it was because of misunderstanding over negative symptomatology nowhere does the l g a say that that's his primary reason for rejecting dr landis opinion and fact it was one of several reasons he didn't list it first he didn't say it was the most important reason for rejecting dr lanza's any and in fact the first reasons he gave for rejecting that opinion or one that the ultimate disability opinion was inconsistent with after months of actual treatment notes during the relevant period which think that the misunderstanding was was that extensive to support that interpretation of the record he didn't find the plaintiff was maleng growing in fact he accepted some kind of schizophrenia impairment found a severe and adopted restrictive limitations from it he also adopted the opinion of the state agency review and psychologists who presumably do know what schizophrenia is and what negative sentiment here after their functional limitations so there's a medical symptoms and dr monza himself was uncertain about schizophrenia so when it was stated that there was that everyone was clear that mr floyd had schizophrenia that's not necessarily so dr land diagnosis changed over time at one point he said probable schizophrenia said possible schizophrenia in one report he indicated that he couldn't really solidify the diagnosis of schizophrenia so to follow the l g a for some skepticism or at least uncertainty about it  that dr lanza had had overstated the extent of kind of schizophrenia and i think he was simply trying to say that there's no indication that plaintiff was overstating his symptoms yes that's a good point and i want to address that issue because a central part of the i'll just rationale is that it is it is not the case here that planets mental impairment caused him to lose all of these jobs it may have caused him to lose some fired from k f c but from mcdonald's a fifty eight of the record plaintiff actually testified that he quit the job and he left not because of his mental impairment but because of what eating pork treatment and low  hundred nine where he worked for a couple days or a few days with kaiser aluminum as a part tender and he simply quit that job after a couple days because he said he didn't like it and then feel the work was for him and this is really the essence of what they l j was focusing on it's also incorporated in plaintiff's testimony of pages sixty five through seventy where plaintiff says that he could go back to work at least part time part time initially just because he would require some time to get used to work again felt he was drifting through life and simply had found a job that he enjoyed well that's understandable and that happens with a lot of young adults but it doesn't mean that his job sure search should be subsidized on the government's dime and another job a third job i haven't talked about is the dishwasher job that he had while at olive garden restaurant there is no evidence on the record at all that he was unable to perform that shop in fact he described it as simply running a disk washing machine  very simple type of employment and a related point that makes this case unique is that at step four you don't even have to find that a claimant has the capability to perform full time work part time work his schizophrenia by history but dr nyce didn't list any functional limitations he did mention what's called a global assessment a functioning swore a gap score but there is no requirement in the regulations that l j talk about such a score in fact in august two thousand commissioner in a comment in the federal register indicated that gas wars don't have any correlation to this very earth mental disorders another argument i want to point out because i didn't mention my brief was that plaintiff argues for the first time on appeal that to l j in order an opinion from his treatment cornett or mr kenny but again plaintiff didn't raise that argument to district court and it's raised here for the first time on appeal the problem with that in addition is that it's and opinion from an other source other source is qualified to give in essence latest money observations from such sources are valuable  thank you rick regarding the fast food job it is true that and that mr fly didn't say he was fired from his job at mcdonalds the most recent time he worked as a fast food clerk was that kentucky fried chicken feet was fired from that  anti psychotic medications when he wasn't taking higher doses of the anti psychotic medications he was having problems with violent outbursts and not getting along with those and slowed him down or that the medicines buttoned down made him sleepy and  regarding dr names or doctor and i'm still not sure how it's pronounced and the reason that he didn't identify more functional limitations was because he thought the record should be further developed and he did identify a very low level assessment a functioning score a gaff score a fifty which corresponds to serious impairments in the commissioner's now arguing that followed that doesn't really mean anything however the end ministry of law judge didn't make that argument he didn't give any reasons for rejecting this opinion and didn't acknowledge the development that was necessary and so for that reason it would be a post hoc rationalization on the part of the government to try to argue this now