it is more probable than not that mcintyre was in the course of his employment when all of this happens so you're saying if i can some of the wire that american tires on in the mixed purpose encounter no sir i'm not saying that i am i'm so i'm seeing it in the alternative i'm saying the evidence is that he was not avenues he could have explored that he did not we have no record of what actually transpired we know that he filed requests for hearings perhaps nineteen b s we don't have any record of what transpired the workers compensation act nothing in the workers compensation and nothing in the rules of the illinois industrial commission workers compensation commission and mill president from this course or the supreme court as a step was any kind of that just can't be considered by this court and i still think that's sad though i think that's something that the the commission or the legislature ought to look at i believe nineteen b one would be an avenue of objection to that redacted report once the report was admitted as evidence there was no motion to strike any of the questioning of the petitioner in cross examination there is no presentation of rebuttal evidence so all if there was any impropriety with regard to the submission of that guy committed was certainly waived by the petitioner in that document as was pointed out provides an alternative company related to that then we'd have an argument that the police report was somewhat equivocal and vigorous excuse me discrepancies in his testimony in the petitioners but the fundamental issue is that mr muhammad went in there but he really didn't hear what was going back and forth between the petitioner and anthony davis so as far as the actual content of the conversation is purely has nothing to do with the guy's work so you're not conceding that he went there or official business are you i'm certain that inference could be drawn i'm saying what we have here is even business so with them what else you got you got personal and as far as as calling any other witnesses who were going to call we would call anthony davis we have no relationship with anthony davis witness any of the other form podium for use of the respondent were there they would have no personal knowledge of what transpired and by the way the business sold out three four years before trial the commission's decision should be a for  one worker's compensation was being administered in the context of the administration bragging about how many claims were not being filed and so you know we petition just to walk over to the investor commission especially so i think the court i don't think there's anything out there counsel suggests the legislature sure that i think these supervising courts need to take a look at this just as they did in contrary this different issue but it's kind of the same problem  well first of all the davis at davis macintyre is testifying testifying under oath it's the only sworn testimony we have in this house  should they call he testified to all of this he testified to the culture at allegiance how the networking works that's why co leader is there he doesn't seem to understand what's going on with me from all the evidence is that  are well that in any event there is an oath in my view an overwhelming amount of very credible evidence that is not rebutted and not responded to and is handled by this responded in the same kind of way that