the court room deputy has the time heater and she will let you know when the red light is on and she will also give you a two minute warning to let you know you have two minutes left with your argument so it five weeks to two released and asked for the release of the content from the generals the court held that because of the protective order and here we could mark make a sufficient showing in switzerland to ask for the release of material stored in an released the twenty million dollars could be ruled against her it could be more than twenty million dollars plus as the chorus of we are after the funds dismissed the case they were able to get a criminal proceeding or determinations things has to be a vehicle and we think the different standards for stipulated protective orders versus orders and or for that cause it seems in the order that perhaps the jacks here indicated that it was both st of all which one do you think it was and do you think it matters to the which were not fighting over weren't even marked then they hadn't been produced in discovery at this come since then the scope of the court's recent case in chiquita and therefore the burden of the funds to show why the documents should not be released and the own and they've been able to rely upon in this whole proceeding a low in here is again an invalid agape in saying they would the able to protect documents and the case law as the court knows that's not enough the court cited  of this private criminal complaint the five working with the swiss the materiality of the document when you have a forty five page private complaint which isn't it revealed to six months after the fact with ninety some exhibits dramatically were our client has to testify for her assets and we would for her liberty in five weeks and terms of change circumstances all reveal that the equities or whatever of berman was were not balanced properly and this corner sho privilege which means we took it seriously we returned everything we didn't keep anything therefore we could not make an adequate representation to the swiss tribunal to swiss counsel and they said that can't ask for them which we didn't make an adequate disclosure  didn't the district court judge assumed in this case and one of his other willems that the swiss are working hand in glove with the fonz and that's what this record reflects that the swiss asked for certain documents that your complementary they got him that other documents were turned over  to assist the swiss and we're in a different position we didn't have the ability in that protective order unless there was a request from the swiss to turn anything those now would we have to return and destroy positional popovich we've returned the documents the with this code is done it as a matter of practice in any number of occasions and the court got wrong both modify on the order among other things or to return the documents and i got the board want and what's the prejudice if we if you  looking for parity in a fair proceeding in switzerland we want to be able to defend ourselves we want to not have a twenty million dollar thirty million dollar or forty million dollars judgment and if and as a matter of basic fairness