take new evidence on country conditions and the case was remanded to the judge for that purpose the judge said if i think good lines for the petitioner and the government could supplement the record with the new country conditions but before that deadline arrive when the judge refused to do that they should have sent the case back to the judge and said do this we told you to do follow our order and take evidence of country conditions now this is a single panel member of humans who was quite a surprise at the stade panel member would mandatory release of withholding of removal and protection of the un convention against torture you see the judge was saying i deny this person discretion and i find i'm because i find him not credible but those questions are not important when you're i think that's also very important to this case i've been doing how the in cases for twelve years in the senate and as a practical matter what happens is that when these cases return because of new potential conditions and there's an outstanding credibility problem that judges react the same way this judge reacted i found of not credible the first time therefore i'm not going to take any new evidence so we want a decision on credit on the credibility also and i think that we've adequately well convincingly demonstrated in our brief that none of the credibility grounds that the judge decision used are germane to the issue of whether he was persecuted or not they don't go to the heart of the matter these the judge did the first time when the case was remanded for new country conditions he said i didn't believe the person the first time and i didn't i did this question the first time for i'm not going to change my position and that's what will happen if we don't have a credibility determination by this court the judge time i mean the country conditions as we showed in our motion to reconsider the struggle ten to thirty thousand christians a threat at that time the new country report published a month a month ago to six hundred thousand christians have fled the country now that is very court just oh those new country conditions issued by the part of the state say that six hundred thousand christians have now fled and they did dedicate paragraph after paragraph to muslim terrorist persecution against christian removed anybody since the first gulf war and certainly after the second action in march two thousand and three they're not returning person the immigration court itself doesn't necessarily come across on heap or but in this case the issue of whether the translation we're looking at absolutely but one would look to see whether a problem in translation had been raised present this country conditions information instead he waited until the filing of his motion to reconsider therefore the issue of whether it was fair for the immigration judge to rely on the unchallenged underlying  thank you thank you there is one very important clarification that must be made i'm sorry the council has misstated the record at the transcript of page twenty nine at the remanded removal proceedings the judge says but i will  parties to submit what they believe is appropriate and change the country conditions and i'll ask that both parties do that by june twenty third please that date never changing because on march thirty first  person's identity he just had questions about the identity documents identity documents which the government had copies of and could have taken to forensics at any time to examine throughout the three hearings three individual hearings that