credibility finding and also not meeting the burden of showing that there was a possibility of future  the average credibility finding is not supported by substantial evidence on the record and i'd like the court to consider the immigration judge's decision very specifically with respect to what it used to be five tenets of the religion and certain terms with respect to jehovah's witnesses and secondly the immigration judge relied on several omissions which she found w central and relevant and with the heart of the claim that this interview those admissions out were not significant so they didn't go to the heart of the crime and they were in fact mentioned in her initial declaration the immigration judge did recognize that  petitioner made fact want to go forward slowly consistently chronologically and that the immigration judge would prefer somebody to go directly to the point and therefore bypass a lot of testimony that may be needed in order to case where there were three different declarations that were inconsistent internally this is not a case where the petitioner was hired in a lie and then recanted this is not a case where there is some type of documentary evidence that shows in fact fearful but perhaps that fear hasn't risen to the level where she is to the point where an asylum application in a third country or another country is an option for her it's possible that she would go improper now i'm not saying it's improper but i think the ultimate finding of the never spread ability finding because somebody did go back to their country or travels their whole times it's not support is not proper i think that's improper because you have to look at what happened if there was battery psychological torture and then after that event in one thousand nine hundred nine notwithstanding the fact that she had traveled back and forth from russia after that event that is finally the point her breaking point and again i believe that everybody has a breaking point where they finally say ok i've had enough this is enough this is when i have to i have to make this decision whether to to remain or whether to go and at this point in april one thousand nine hundred nine after th good afternoon your honour's john cunningham from the problem just disappearing on behalf of the attorney general i think as a matter of clarity it might be helpful if i point out the distinction of the immigration judge made and his decision with that she submitted a letter from an elder of the homes where this congregation here in los angeles that she had started attending services there in the spring of two thousand she submitted a photograph of her being baptized in march of two thousand and one and she also submitted a medical directive she signed also in march of two thousand and one indicating that she would decline blood transfusions in accordance with the jokes with trade and immigration judge said yes i am prepared to believe that this person has become a member jehovah's witness face since she has been here to question love the one he had trouble as three i'm sorry she had trouble was whether the petitioner had been a member of the jehovah's witness faith while she lived in russia which of course  according to the jehovah's witness faith the soul dies along with the body and the time of death and the great thing judged how does this fit with your theory that well you know the immigration judge grants that trips to the u s she came here to los angeles because she had relatives here and why she returned to russia and immigration judge simply did not believe that someone who happens to object into the harm this petitioner clean to have been subjected to would have done that county has pointed out accurately that after the last trip to the united states before she came here finally there was an incident where if you claimed that she had been abducted and beaten by persons who are pushing for her being a jehovah's witness and that incident took place in april of one nine hundred ninety nine an immigration judge was troubled because in her declaration the petitioner mention an abduction but then at the hearing added certain horrific details that were not in the declaration she said that she was forced to put on a military uniform now this is significant because jehovah witnesses the immigration judge point this out are forbidden by their faith mcbain national service laws that's why we have so many asylum cases involving witnesses they tend to get in trouble in countries around the world because they will not accept national service laws or military service so putting a military uniform on a jehovah's witness would be a highly offensive act she then claimed that while she had that uniform a new concept that's even still new today and we believe that it's unfair to place upon people coming from russia whether they're jewish or muslim or jehovah's witness or any other faith that they should somehow be as knowledgeable as we would want them to be  ritual and then many many years later his student went and he didn't know the prayer but he knew the ritual and years and years later his student went and he just knew her to be and that's myself and maybe that's enough and