intrigue i was a complete a work day or work week without exhibiting behavioral extremes we were performing at a at a at and pace our persistence excuse me and this wasn't addressed at all we don't know in this case whether the l j is a limitation to just simple repetitive work which involves how quickly a person can earn a job right that's an s p p to judge the job which means it can be learned in less than thirty days it's not a specific limitation of concentration if a person can persistence and pace you start analyzing each of those words well we're hearing now it's put that all into one job and you can't do assembly line stuff because of the pressure and then there are certain other things but the the vocational expert based on the limitations outlined in the hypothetical said i'm going to look at individual jobs that are goal oriented and that testimony in conjunction with the a addresses moderate difficulties with concentration persistence or pace what about wasn't in the second or third question that judge brinn was referring to the hypothetical it was presented wasn't one of those question about being off be an individual that has limitations to a degree that they would have to be off task for twenty percent of the work day right it's one thing to say he can perform simple tasks ok but then perhaps but then isn't there a question about can the individual perform those tasks over the course of a work day and so here when they be you know that question you know no given the given that you know the state agency doctor said the state agency doctors narrative porson says this individual which seems moderate limitations and concentration persistence or pace could pay attention for sufficient periods to complete t and that is the reassurance we have that we don't need additional in this case if he's doing the simple repetitive tasks and the workplace changes are minimal he will be able to persist throughout the day and doesn't need th extra off task time the a l j act about and a hypothetical but that doesn't mean that it had to be included in the r f c well i guess if you're looking at the task that what we're talking about elected to do something that it can do only it's going to be at a slower pace it's probably going to have to be less complicated and you could sell the beginning and the end and  grip strength was only four out of five but it definitely that he was able to easily get on and off the examination table he had full muscle strength and his shoulders and he had no sensory deficits the l g a discussed all of that and there was no create the logical bridge that was done here and there is no error can you help me with one thing this is this is i just want to better understand this you you make an argument in your brief on page thirty nine where you're discussing the party case and one of the things you're pointing out is that unlike in barga here the narrative portion of this mental r f c form was was filled out as opposed to just a box being checked or something i know your point is not a mechanical point your point is not a process point i trust it's not right you know ok can you explain the significance or how would you encourage us to think about the way this form and spelled out for not filled out in the context of the issue that's presented because when i read it i say hold on with the first is make a box chapter not shakhtar i don't understand what points being made here absolutely so if we just in the case of bargain we just had we don't have any narrative we don't have any way to say here's an individual that has these limitations what does that look like when he gets into the job market and let's just be narrative assessment  records the check box is eight and objective you just check it there's no nuance there's no explanation so when you get down to the narrative we understand better ok if mr winstead is limited to simple unskilled takes a unskilled work if you'd limited in that way and his social interactions are limited then he can persis without special consideration fleshes out there's only so much you can get from a check box but if you have a narrative you can better understand how this individual's mental impairments will impact his ability to get and sustain to get a job and to do a performant job and then the question has to become doesn't it did that and how did the l j deal with the substance your mental that's not in dispute and changing that determination at step two but in terms of the overall record what we see more times than not his mental status examinations he has a depressed mildly depressed mood or normal but he's able to be pleasant he makes eye contact he has logical thought processes and to the extent that he has anxiety and stomach panic attacks and we know that at the administrative hearing he didn't mention panic attacks at all and the whole the record shows that he would be able to do this and that the bulk of his the bulk of his anxiety would be problematic with other people which is incident that was actually described by the l j as a good day that he was having where he couldn't deal with community resources he had to have the help of his therapist to do that if you can't make a phone call without getting upset and angry with the people you're calling