some of the concerns the government has agreed to a former sentencing in this case which will allow mr potter to or reassert these issues that he asserted prior to turn of the district court i have discussed the possibility of a higher sentence with mr he's thirty seven years old he's working in a job that doesn't require a ged i'm also aware of a state case that came to this court and unfortunately i don't have the citation i can provide that but the factual scenarios the inmate was given a cd containing his resume that he had prepared while in person through a class in prison he was given the cd upon his release when a probation officer came to his house because he was involved child pornography there was a limit on computers and peripheral computer equipment he was allowed to think that on appeal from these cases we want to raise issues such as the issues raised aside from the supervised release for one we didn't know at the time necessarily the governor was going to agree to a full resentencing and that we didn't and less the court has disagreements but that they would like to address with me i will reserve the rest of my time about all this christianson i was a little surprised to see on the one hand you arguing a failure to determine whether supervised release is necessary and also arguing that mr plata had received treatment for medical and mental health issues while in prison prior to the instant offense but had never received adequate care for his conditions after his reentry into society he requested a shorter sentence in the instant offense to allow him to receive treatment and participate in programs when released that would make him less likely to re offend that's that sounds like cases and given mr plodders record would it be reasonable and disagreed remey and for the district judge to respond by saying to mr plata in essence if if supervised release is such a big problem for this violent career offender who has got what twenty six criminal history points i believe at this time about twice what you need to max out under the guidelines if this is such a problem i need to protect the public from him so i'm just going to go to the top of the guideline range i think that certainly can be a concern and of the district court particularly in this case but must be balanced with the fact that he's never received that supervised release treatment by continuing treatment rm the explanation of the consideration that the government gave or excuse me that the sentencing court gave in determining a one hundred fifty one month sentence of imprisonment determined to work in the sentence of imprisonment your honor this  repeatedly said that in just a court need not take off every single argument presented in mitigation but instead that if a reasonable person who is familiar with the facts of the case would adequately understand why a court reached a sentence that it did for the district court need not belabor the point and in this case there was an adequate record both in content and the context of the sentencing hearing for the one hundred fifty one month sentence that was imposed as to any supervised release conditions that are being challenged here again the government has agreed there should be a full remand for a sentencing on those conditions and the district court can address each condition in turn at that time if there are no further question