now he wanted it distributed half between his parents and half between the parents of his deceased wife as of today i believe his mother surely is the only person living out of those four people  estate that he gifted it to her and then takes it out of the estate this case started with the citation hearing and to touch on the issue of the stop will very quickly i don't think it's a very valid argument but  but there was a procedure i guess you could call that was happening between the time the maid of the checks read their house and she actually got proceeds from her son it's my understanding that she would came with cash the checks deposit them in his account and then would turn around and write her a check and it's my understanding would know would be for the same amount would be zero for a lesser amount sometimes than what the actual settlement check was full i think it's very poor to understand this case as well is the fact that june were clearly his name they had to be endorsed by him they were divorced by him all along from when he started giving her money and each individual check that he turned around wrote her that was a separate individual gift that's not a gift of a future possession is not enough there has to be more and i think that's what the facts of this case show it that case often that there is no legal requirement for indoors well i think i wouldn't necessarily disagree that it would just because there's no but that that that's it i mean there's that but there's got to be a little bit more you know to it like the immaculate there wasn't any evidence of any procedure like there is in this case where he would go there he would get the check he would do or said he would deposit it in his own account and after he married more closely my client he would deposit it in a joint account with her name on it so it's like they were both making a gift to shirley at that point in an individual gift distinguish the cases that were cited by the appellant mccormick in the court case there was a specific deed in that case where the deed was transferred to the person who is claiming here and will say that it was a joint account with a person that's where there was a deed a joint account and yet another deed and sold and were that person who was claiming the death was actually on the count or on the deed that's not the case here she wasn't enjoying around the checks everything had to be endors blank instrument go she could do whatever she want with it at that time but that's not what he did he had counted taken with any evidence that i'm sorry was there any evidence whether or not she had a checking account i don't know what gr other thing that i think that he's very pointed out is you know she says that the estate is to stop from trying to collect these checks well the evidence is that she didn't get any more checks beginning june of two thousand so the stuff i should have came back in june of two thousand and sixteen when she'll be when she stopped receiving checks so i don't think that that's a valid argument in this case i don't think a stop applies in this case because there isn't really very much that this is what was said that i don't know they had very good relationship with shirley so i think there's a little bit of a modesty there but regardless of i think the court has to look and first determine whether which standard to apply who has the  about the fact that the court did consider that she stopped receiving checks back in june of two thousand and sixteen and they claim that that was improper that was not improper that wasn't the only thing for syria if you look at the this is not assignable and it belongs to the state if he passes away before all the payments are made it goes to the estate that's undisputed that's what the trust document says simple contract will be plain ordinary meeting of the terms of the evidence outside the four corners of the contract that say this forms to the estate the checks were in the name of the estate the trust said for the checks when they can call it interest as it was to the estate if something happens to kim cool the other to try to collect them for the estate there was certainly a good faith and reasonable belief on behalf of the administrator at these checks the long to the estate they were named in the name of kenneth cole the loan and the trust act in the