storage area and the entrance to i think it's better not laying around if baka dock i thank you very much they're still there and they still represent what i consider to be a significant danger to the public and i'm just wondering it's been about three years since i brought that out and two meetings ago i discussed it briefly with you again following that meeting i wrote a letter to mr sylvestris asking him to provide me with details about how that particular situation meaning the two trees or the trees power were handl correspondence on this as it is been a number of years ago i know that i have contacted the risin and the p s c on this matter and then he goes on to state that i will be getting a letter out shortly and will copy you on have we made any progress on that issue mr sylvester now ok i would like to know if we could set a deadline to get this problem solved we're going to set a deadline that's not you three but i would think that really the property owner is where we should be going first i know that if i had an open sore in my backyard or an open well in my backyard mr would be writing me a letter asking me to do something about it very quickly or else face the wrath of the township and under the circumstances i believe that's the same situation here this is a very real danger i'm not imagining  and i feel that we have an obligation to do something to secure that property so that we can safely traverse the area without the thoughts of perhaps being crushed by a tree or a log or whatever the case may be so let me ask this is there a prohibition on asking the property owner to do something about his trees now have we tried to contact that property owner and a very good it's disgraceful that these utilities get away with it absolutely every day and absolutely i mean you know if it were our children that were involved in an accident or for that matter without the children just you and i driving mine and one of those carrying will to address council or not agenda item on this is the former sears building one and the area where the storm so there will be tied into it in the rear of the building here and eventually connects out to penn dot stores or if you forty five rockingham when we purchased the sears building some years ago it was known to us that they had a problem with the gas tank said to gas tanks in the property and they brought in the company from new jersey they did this for a period of six years and it's come down to the point where they have isolated the the toxins now in one spot which is on the corner of the deck of the building with the northeast corner but the next area from six feet down to eleven feet is full pockets and they were then put this ground out to dry they can't transport the dirt without having water come out of it and they would take the dirt off of the site after the water is drained front then dots agreeable to to this state highway to agree to do this  we're now ready for them to begin again and so are they with the spring or summer coming on the ground water then that they would ask of aid from the six to eleven foot area but drain down through this storm sewer area back into the area that is the soil that is not contaminated along with other slag and and stone and it would finish out as a clean or just about clean area depending if it's not quite clean they would apply chemicals for the next few years and clean the last bit up but they expect to have it cleaned by this theory if they don't do it by the ask a vision method it will take probably another exposure mr johnson we were talking about trying to establish a precedence because this is a new role from penn dot do you have any idea what ten dollars ten ten as for example we don't have a dog in the hunt we this this policy or panned out is now saying anytime there's a new storm sure connections with other storms or that they're going to want the township to be the applicant and one of the concerns we have a lot is now this one is of because of temporary have that discharge into history and that may be one of the reasons why they are there they've changed their policy in trying to transfer that on to the municipality so you're implying that they are trying to put liability on township rather than holding on when it came down to the point where d p said this is the way to do it with you go ahead and start the application and the work the bond fell away when i asked him to fund it with cash rather than go back to a bond holder a bond agent decision now but once we finish the center church intersection i'm wondering whether or not it might be wise for the township to consider putting some sort of a a stationary location where people can put signage at the lower part of center church where they stick them in the ground all the time something to consider for future and perhaps we can ask mr sylvester to look into what something like that might cost it'll be months i'm sure but it might be another avenue to prevent some of the stuck in the ground signs every time we turn around  drive where the house is what they want to do is resume this back portion and then have a driveway come in right off of here going to use that i would be like right about here so they would make this commercial back here the house would you point out the house for that property is about how it is right here alex they are not the other  it was all duplexes now they're going with the singles and most of which they're going to be close together and we would want to keep sprinklers there's a couple of units they'd like to move further away on each and they're asking for permission to not have to sprinkle those units and the only way to to address that would be to many a conditional use decision so they're asking for a hearing for that purpose they say no then we will need to look at proceedings of putting in a pump station at that site and tying it into this line that will be constructed so it'll be a lot less of  week they're very close to an agreement i guess they had a few things that needed to be updated because some of the numbers changed from clear to me in a simple but they're moving forward with that and  children so they're moving forward with that as mr silvestri said d p s wanting to look at the five thirty seven and i haven't spoken with anyone there so i'm not sure where they are with that and the encouraged to get serious about negotiating with clarion they insisted that they only became aware of this most recent version five to be corrected drastic preens now nine months old that week i do want to commend union township on the record for finally getting educated about what's going on down there i spent weeks reviewing the five thirty seven with chester engineers their visible engineer and we dissected it carefully and it doesn't hold water it's a completely thought kim and pretends to make an argument they're trying to be fiscally responsible in constructing a new treatment plant however the simple technical facts of their five thirty seven actually demonstrate the opposite that it's fiscally irresponsible to do that whenever a life well i'm not so sure we or i think we are so ok so basically i want to make a plea to this council to interact with your representatives at the peter's creaks or authority and get this cleared agreement signed is the only get with the result of the union resolutions there are no other options on the table by state statute then your solicitor could confirm this there is no boss of it you're building a new treatment facility miles around told i'm going to cut you off first of all i take exception to the fact that this council has not been senatorial district we are on the absolute tag the end of senator brewster's district which goes from from here to monroeville out of them on valley we will not recommend t p k was because at that and conversation at that time he still had not determined who would be doing the grading work which is the major portion of the project some talking with w decision that was made to go with the other company in those three thousand dollar difference is the right decision still stand by their recommendations i would make just one comment i'm not sure if anybody else provided but to give you an idea of the scale of this their project was very similar to ours in that the total cost of the project was north of eight hundred fifty thousand only sixty five thousand that represents the first abortion done by and the air force band will be performing it's of it's a free concert and open seating so come really interesting landmarks the band director mr barney was an air force