tech system with a look at ok for for drug use that any time that person was on a ship in the future that that was sufficient to search a cabin a particularly if there were two people who had information that may have been somewhat conviction or not the you couldn't cite to the court there why have a charge here or such and such year the court you want to know was there a conviction i mean what does an indictment mean right and is that does that mean anything for you know reasonable suspicion and he knows what you seeing and what he's been trained in and what he normally comes across in his searches because he is responsible for looking at all of the passengers who are going on this cruise and when he looks at this particular travel party you see is not one but  well it means that there was at least sufficient cause to indict and so in terms of developing reasonable suspicion again nothing nothing further than that i think you're representing that reflects a grand jury indictment that is the traditional in that that is correct is there's no reason to think here that the da indictment yes i should explain the tax records i didn't i apologize and realize the nature of the question the text records have a very limited amount of space for writing so they don't include lengthy descriptions of things such as an indictment on drug charges de indictment available to him what he has a built in are the tax records and what do you also has available to him in theory right like if i get if we're going to assume that he should have known about wit it the information the directions that he would have gotten from would would have led him to conclude that the information before him was sufficient to develop to have reasonable suspicion because when it looks at a couple things that are really relevant here and when this court accepted that knowing the itinerary of the ship and the ship in which it was going to the same drug transit trunk sort of country it was the same ship it was the same cruise so it looked the first factor it looked out was there was destinations which are relevant here so to the extent of search challenging reliance on is not a high standard that will prevent customs officers from detecting drug smuggling on our orders rather it sets a relatively low threshold that will continue to permit the kind of cabin searches customs officers currently conduct by reasonable suspicion to search and i think more directly to your honor's question we did it is self says that we have to allow customs officers to rely on tax records because we recognize that given the constraints of border inspections their hands would be tied if we that they needed to independently confirm or investigate tax records that's not a possibility that we did acknowledges that and says expressly as a result that customs officers should be allowed to rely on existing tax records but the second  specific a language of the tech centuries that no one is suggesting that that is a constitutional violation the particular words that were used again in the language of the tech centuries reflects the fact that they are entered under both time constraints as the individual here officer august going through the three thousand plus passenger manifest and they are meant to communicate specific things in terms of the results they seek some here miss b remains record is entered because thank you counsel thank border are presumed the reason there is a border exception to the war requirement so what we're really dealing with here are can they rely on these exceptions and there is no exception for the knocking down t and think about this one would there be a different role on the border for knocking out they've because like down the toilet they don't play by the way just remember how they go in there they go in there with the key they're working with the cruise ship company ok if they're not putting on any evidence to say that the evidence would be to slow shipping control the functions of the crucial one size of the day before we did in the third circuit and it was not yet clear