and dispose on for about three years and finally be defended in an effort to comply with production requests and looking for the workers to find the except times no longer have any import and to suggest that all the all the cases that have considered whether children are in kate users of the sidewalks say they are as long as they're under because of the past fine change in our society and the changed circumstances that existed at the time that we're going with it so there's an expiration date an ordinance of some sort of there has to be there thank you your honor if it please this court council my name is karen turtle and today i represent the village of case very small village of fewer than three hundred resident is not arguing to you today that anything that was filed by the plaintiff in response to our motion for summary judgment was misconstrued by the trial court the plaintiff is not was says that people under the age of twelve are permitted intended users and people over the age of twelve marked that assertion is talking about case all addressing that serious stand shoots and what those born into this in the city of chicago said or number why just like in champaign urbana nobody can ride a bike in the business district no person twelve or older shall ride a bicycle on any sidewalk in any district unless the sidewalk is officially designated as a bicycle half and in that liquor case you had an adult bicyclist who was trying to get to the designated bicycle and the court said it doesn't matter what they were trying to do the ordinance prohibited what they were trying to do so you may know what i can but you still can't fall within what you have to follow and in order to avoid the toward immunity act which is you have to be both an intended and permitted use or so those cases are really that's those cases are broke state construed to ordinances dealing with bicycles and came up with the conclusion that under those circumstances under those ordinances that village was doing in acting that warrant was controlling the use of the property and if you would reach a conclusion that says college doesn't apply to children then no municipal government will ever be able to control any use of property we just say kids can pretty much do anything they want you know they can use  i mean we do have you know they don't know the desires or with the mystery but but that doesn't the fact that you can or you cannot and i don't know this because it didn't come up in time for me to do any research on it so the fact that you may or may not be able to enforce this work since against the child doesn't make any use by the child and intent of the village ordinance it's clear  referenced earlier  which they said don't write your bios you seem to be arguing that the village need to pass a new word if i know every time a new sight more oh no i'm not suggesting at all i'm just i'm just pointing out that there are a number of historical facts have a phone that's not connected by a wire to a major telephone company you know we all carry around cellphones illegally but that doesn't mean the legislature went through and look for old crazy organises and get away with it i think  mayor is a person in the sidewalk this little child writing up and down it and yet there is no there's no complaint there's no suggestion the mayor said stop you know it's it's one of those cases where history has