does and that's why collins says let's narrow it because we're looking at the independent a robbery of something and if it's the robbery of another person and it's just run of the mill robbery then we're not talking about  participants were nikhil legal drug business in las vegas as buyers sellers and users of controlled substance herrera purchase drugs and gave them  thirteen zero five when she asked her to come to montana after he got heat for got his workman's comp money and here and there and direct effects such as would be in the columns case where the robbery took place in one state and the government made the argument while the victim couldn't use his car many cases the eleventh circuit for example even think it's carson only for the individual traveled from chicago the florida rob the elderly widows for  credible that there was credible evidence at all of what was going on it was right pereira invited himself from montana to go hiking in hunting and whatever and ended up getting killed up there there was no indication that he was lured up there small level sort of you know just beyond possession kind of saying that was what his a cello said about their relationship but not about the relationship of this trip moment money i think i understand your point on that let me forth across state lines using the victim's credit card for various purposes evidence in the record and i think when you look at it all i don't think under what colleagues are trying to say lopez told the court to do it that is narrow federal jurisdiction i don't think we can look at what happened before or and he got in a little part of one a very little part of one without any specifics to show why he was being credible you can just see if they'd like this where life really had a huge burden of explaining why he went along with  coverup he needed to be able to say specific reasons he didn't need to say there is a dangerous guy this is your we needed to understand there is dangerous god because of x y and z and not only do i know it but other people will tell y thank you very much will give you five minutes for rebuttal why don't you set the court for the government twenty five minutes rice cousin is a friend of mine and i know his wife and his kids and i just really want to get away from this i didn't kill the guy i just wanted to be away from this whole thing i didn't want to get involved in anything further i just wanted to forget everything his don't know that he was hampered from as it's implemented in other circuits you can use direct contest when you don't have any direct growth and you need to ferret out the connections of individual interstate commerce which are your best case including correct from from the transaction there there were business appears in exactly one place mcgrath contacted various business men and women in the pocatello area there's no i find no discussion test because we've got the guy stealing the wallet out of the prosecutor's pocket taking the cash and he's on the way to the a t m machine and he gets arrested it's a state crime he gets to the a t m machine and withdraws they the money it's a federal crime that's the kind of stuff that collins was trying to say we're not looking at what happens between individuals that's why we're looking what happens between businesses and commercial dangerous that's why you can be looking at what happens to the a