seriously affected the fairness and integrity of  he said he said it on redirect and he said not only was barnes on the phone and that barnes kind of done it because the robber was not did not show itself and there was no evidence of the robber using a cell phone at the time but no business drawing i think the concern is that the jury does give in court to recognize this juries can give case agents f b i agents they have sort of an aura of reliability certainly when talking about things like that didn't exclude or include anybody whereas what i did you're still not making clear to me anyway why one account that is that barnes was on the phone has greater have credibility wait because it was it was a late opinion that should not have been admitted it was error in the sense that it was the way opinion it should not have been amended it was not the that's true that that still doesn't answer the this in the circumstances of this case where you have two african american men of similar high living side by side it was an extremely close case sort of geographically physically and en confronted with the allegation that they rushed to judgment they ruled out the wrong guy were they not entitled to exploring raw i really ruled out for this wasn't and i know the government pointed to the indicated resulted in defense trial counsel's use of they meaning the prosecution had blinders on right yes wasn't that the frequent refrain from the beginning right from the closing argument it was but a so with that having been the theme of the difference the prosecution was required coming out of the m evidence it should be putting before the jury evidence that the jury should have to evaluate because it's based on speculation it also feels that second prong it wasn't helpful speculation barnes was on the phone is not helpful especially when coming refuting your defense theory which you have taken from the start they have blinders on if they don't explain within that context why they went with fulton as opposed  explaining right or wrong but explaining why he decided in terms of physical form this is the guy and this is because they didn't have sufficient relevant familiarity with either your parents and i think you can see it in the difference between the testimony of the witnesses whereas a witness a skill like a better word that the witnesses who knew felt and testified his head was smaller he was more you was somewhat unusual so so it's a stop to see both both people they certainly got to see paul and then they got to see barnes as well but jerry didn't we and the video the video in the surveillance footage was perfectly clear this was not the kind of case where the  person had to read through many people in the in the photographs or grainy footage it was quite clear officer gomez's testimony i do think i think it's clear beard into expert testimony where he's talking about the height of the counters and the mouth and then the government didn't go back to that summation because that really wasn't the point of the sesamoid let me let me take you to another issue that your adversary did not address during her presentation and i think what we were doing while the prosecutor was doing the summation he had eight of the animation playing on the picture and he showed where the circles are overlapping and the undisputed i'm contradicting testimony from three witnesses including a defense witness was that location was had lost a significant amount of weight by the time of trial and that was testimony that was on the record and there's evidence that finton was attempting to look less muscular and so that's why it's just about rebuttal whether instead look this is why he might look less muscular than he did back back then so this was submission argument again very quickly that government argued that that testimony about this southwest portion was not contradicted the problem with the summation with the way the government portrayed it is the counter to that that despite the specificity of testimony from dr forward in that regard but it was still a fear for unscrew the prosecutor to ask the jury to draw