child the reason being the mother had been arrested for drug dealing and welcome also filed was a family the family case in which time to hearing and grant contends that the court's scissored to award her custody was against the manifest weight of the  and also an abuse of discretion of the trial court there were or there were differences in testimony as to whether and when grant started visitation with the child he waited until did they confirm that he was the father of the child and according to grant he began visitation with the child after two months of that the germination convicted of a drug dealing that she had married a person who were still on probation for drug dealing and that it was the best interests of the child that he r he was in over the road long distance truck driver and on occasion he had taken the sonne along with another person in his truck and  driving lasted no more than twelve hours but the child was in the truck they were changed diapers or the child was grant's contention that the child wished to go with him and he did take them  it's some long distance trips they visit historical stuff sites there's no contention that the mother was abusive there's no contention that the father was abusive simply since the child had been was grant for i e or that he should have kept custody there is authority although generally out second best in judging their credibility and the court should refuse itself without someone fresh take a look at the credibility of both parties from that issue oh so we represent the individual with whom she later obtained two of the three children from when she called me she'd been thrown in jail mr hoskins mr grant to take the child away i managed to establish visitation or miss hoskins so that we may be continued the bond that was there the challenge is now two and a half years old and it's houses have raised the child from birth a i stayed with the case then tire year and then when miss hoskins and she was on you car started in lincoln county so the visitations could occur so at her mother father live in peace and so the family would go and visit miss hoskins in jail so that the bond forcibly from the family's home east to take you back to mr grant's home course i went down there and under the supreme court rule nine hundred series one judge one family or one child the proud judge rial judge down there communicate with judge funk up in logan county to make sure that you know everybody knew that we were on the right page the case came back to logan county for further further further handling and it was at their point after judge funk made some very significant the solutions case that mr grant filed this motion so the you know the immediate take on that was well you've gotten some adverse decisions here and now you want to change judges and this is right the fall in moshi watch and then we went before judge order judge order i think given a very very fair hearing and he denied the motion to substitute judge fung that's where we stand today i think having bene participant as has mr costello but i think i might have been just a little bit more involved in some aspects of it specifically madison county but having gone through the series of circumstances that's why i call be the responsible parent the custodial parent and i will notice mr costello i do recall that i think some people are questioning my memory i do recall being in the trial in the corps when judge funk brought it up again so and that's where we are today i think that obviously the judge judge fox trial court decision is correct simply because he could see everything that was going on and allow him to measure the brassy of the individuals  and their personalities i don't see were judge from in any way shape or form broad in any prior prejudices that he may have had because at the be honest with you your honour's if he had prejudices against  give adequate opportunity to argue side a case but i was too weak i think the issues were properly vetted i think the manifest weight of the evidence stands in favor of leaving this young man with his family's two of siblings  mrs hoskins has they are older they were taken away from her by he's here yes and given through her father however the father i believe the evidence show deliver them a six to eight months later to the emergency room at the hospital in lincoln and walked away obviously it's of of went back but they were taken away by