MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
one people one of many people i'm sure our country is made up of many kinds of people and yes people from many different countries different religions different color skin even left handed people much about freedom and liberty maybe it's because we had so much they killed my way people all over the world that used to be a weight field might have been pretty good too if they rotated the crops once in a while and i thought these things are a couple of weight on a penny less what i'm fighting for our way yeah no way people all over the world raise wheat fighting for them they're fighting for us couldn't use them well i'm a farmer all of my family's farm i thought about them livestock burning their crops take some pretty bad make farmer  on a farm or fight for something bigger his crops whether he's fighting for something big i figured it must be their freedom they're fighting for their own our team so they're fighting for our freedom to maybe they burned their we wouldn't have to bring our and when the time came they didn't even have to tell us there's some stuff you don't get unless you're going places you don't get french money either it makes you feel like you really want to in god we trust in god all of us trusted in  a jewish boy from iowa a catholic from new jersey white man from chicago and a negro from south carolina this was one i made out of one nation  trusted in each other because we needed each other and when you looked around and saw the other guys you knew that nobody could like we were strong because we were free and equal that's what we were fighting that guy was right when you know america you know what you're fighting for home we let the nazis together and we're going to let the future together that's the thing you learn in the army that a bunch of guys can do anything if they work together that's the way democracy works
from my window when i'm seeing all the rest of the games i mean kathy robbins she's my best friend and i were waiting out there the stadium dressing room for neck and larry she made me think a little by something she said do you wonder oh yes he's quite a flash but did you notice who ran interference for him larry your other boyfriend remember he did course i should have known but they're both so what was the problem to decide which one i like the bit here i wish i says all you have to do is treat everyone else on the road like an unwanted relative or a mother and forget all you've ever learned about being polite to others and you'll make it that's the man says and i believe  by the time we got to my house i was when long and almost exhausted because the way mick drove was well pretty fried the dallas was thrilling to make want a good day for that evening to go dancing at the lake but i turned him down somehow i failed on easy bad writing with him at night you didn't take it very well he was angry as he went away know what was it that you wanted to talk to me about that's so important well look your honor what cappy told us about teen aside this afternoon yes i remember nick said it was pretty silly as i expected he would and that's what i kid can drive an automobile a so special about it
we hear from the government at this time and then you'll have some time to respond if you like thank you very much thanks for coming in today ms winston the united states versus contrasts is this the one where we only have the government counsel present would you waver something at me at once if your opponent comes in thank you very much  well we've got to the bottom of the calendar we got to the bottom of the calendar just to make sure he has an opportunity come in thank you very much will now proceed to the united states versus contrarious or counsel present on that please come forward
for purposes of when it's voluntary and knowing where due process concerns you just need to make sure they understand the consequences of their fleet which is the maximum possible sentence to think again we present this in the form of a rule it's likely mr garcia retail might have answered the question concerning the guidelines been explained to you in the negative which might have highlighted the situation concerning that the iranians nature of the petition and his misunderstanding concerning the government also says well there's no no requirement that this report make findings with respect to a motion withdraw guilty plea life or that's the court that the motion to withdraw plea is sandwiched between twelve the pretrial motion and i thirty  concern either the merits of the motion it really was almost an afterthought or something that we never felt had the government not not raise the issue that it was a district course i don't think it really gets that at all with the actual ruling that was made by the district court you know the whole purpose of findings is really to help  farm it was very differential it is and that and the court had good reasons in this case for denying that the emotion not pressured mr birch makes the argument that the court should have told him about what the practical guidelines potential was not just the maximum of the minimum but but a
hotel you have to help them there was testimony at the hearing from a coworker who was her husband at work at the that the hotel that she did that she had to interact with that had made another maze and she frequently was in conflict with him because of her personality disorder  deal with patrons for example if they need additional towels and they need help with the room they're in the room she's in the room with them it was a problem her concentration definitely to say that then dr williams said that she needed to work in a solitary work environment it wasn't dr williams ascendant it was dr brown the state agency physician said she needed to work in a solitary work environment that a hotel m that correlate to often well i think explain to me that you can also perform the task or not i detail or require concentration in excess of two hours at a time so those are the two pressure to get their work done in a timely way you think that might have any impact on her ability to concentrate and get it worked and in time when i don't believe so there was testimony during the hearing that she stated that when she was asked to pick up the pace that she was able to do so she didn't like to do it but she was able to do it and there were times when she was asked to help out other major we're behind and she did that as well testimony in that case that they can't work there's been an award of benefits now there's another series of cases where the judge found that but the court's account of it was a common and by some way or another but in that case the view wasn't asked that specific question in this case
appreciate your argument counsel i just i'm i'm struggling with the fact that given the numbers even if you send it back in then the district court we figure is all of this what i assume you would  level of enhanced anything above a forty three is a life sentence so i guess my question is even if this court were to do what you wanted where does your client benefit i mean do you think that the district court's going to question counseling folks the issues the government has or you can brief but it goes beyond whether the defendant can achieve anything it's a matter of whether you can even return of this record for different
general south and should be approved this written motion was never actually closed by the government nevertheless the court ultimately deny the motion without and you from your session in writing turning the courtroom by the officers was might have an asian help mind you this is the same officer who in a first report on the transaction used a particular description of him which precludes considered to be people on the track ten minutes specifically more closely you mr patron went back with suffering from a really bad i didn't factions during the course of the strike so i think that this jury has room to doubt and reason to doubt him and question the credibility and the took very substantial steps to minimize the risk of precious also i know that the prosecuting attorney properly downplays the existence of this felony conviction conviction only mentioning it twice mentioning the fact of the fifths judge also repeated that instruction to make them wear instructions at three different points in the trial including at the time the stipulation was actually read to the jury but the critical factor here i think
actually found and this is the peterson was credible and he said that in his decision he said i found her to be a credible witness but he said i thought that she was testifying in the present tense in other words he thought she was testifying about the symptoms that she had generated joint disease in her knees but again found that she could stand and walk sixty hours a day so even if you if you find that deals he acted properly in finding that she had a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis prior to or date explained why he in the fact disregarded both her and her husband's testimony that's kind of a different issue i think that's right i think you're right that he didn't adequately explain that he's botched as if the administrative la on this record saying that there was disability before the onset date then where does that leave leave you only me and if you find that this is peterson's testimony doesn't support disability then i think you should remain on for further proceedings that's why i'm saying if if if if i thought that the jury didn't adequately explain why i disregarded her husband's testimony but if i also think adequately explain why he disregarded peterson and her husband's testimony and we remain and on that basis what then do you do on  you have a medical condition that could cause a certain disabling condition and you have testimonies that you have that you are in fact functionally just single but not medical testimony so those two too but the medical evidence at the time prior to a date last ensured just did not show that she had significant limitations of any kind of humans with them and in that she had symptoms that she felt kind of a veil in front of her overturn the final decision in this case now is as far as the credibility goes we argued that it's not only the present tense explanation that the plaintiff gave it was the other
expected it to come true they only made it possible by taking on the challenge here branching high in these mountains where the terrain makes everything ten times as hard today hank back to the winter just that it was a long rugged winter when the snow fell on the mountain tops in what seemed like a never ending job beautiful but a bad omen comes bring what took months to fall will melt and flow down the slope and into the valleys in a much shorter time satellite launched by nasa and operated by the national weather service take photographs to keep an eye on the developing situation the pictures now show another rain storm forming in the mountains   in the distance the storms and word of its arrival echoing through the valley live close to nature learn to read it's on a tiny screen idly big enough to notice but it should be dry it stays dry all year round to hang the message is clear the flood has started imprinted in hanks memory thousands of dedicated people doing so much working against the thought of how many might die at the water's could not be held back but in their efforts they in recent years scientists have been hard at work on new ways to use the incredible versatility of satellites helping to predict blogs and planning how to prevent a satellite photo manipulat knowing whether this and other conditions will lead to the dangerous floods is a vital interest to scientists instruments installed at key locations can measure the amount of moisture in the soil and they can measure the amount of rain flowing again satellites can provide the answer fortunately for the people in the area satellites were able to provide information that pinpointed the exact times and places where the flood would be most dangerous civil preparedness officials were then able to send out the life saving message to had been snatched up by the river gone wild all right after working so long for the safety of the community now suddenly his own life was in p
client told him that she could only guess what happened with those people since he did not know for sure she heard rumors about the so called room too and she didn't actually know what happened at th villagers in south vietnam correct that's correct yes and and to the extent they were in fact be it conks sympathizers or member of the viet cong insurgent armed forces their job was to kill americans wasn't me all right yes yes let's talk about cat for a moment the question is whether it's more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to vietnam what's the current  experian in vietnam for individuals returning who not only participated in opposing the viet cong in the north it means arming but also participated in the family had remained without incident and it was an individual as determination as opposed to a general determination that's correct yes she did not make a determination that conditions had improved generally for people
there's not invalidate motions in order to do away with plea bargains that were created it's not always the friend it's intention of creating a plea agreement that is impenetrable there will not be a movie we overturned by some collateral attack a later time in the furniture at least try to strike the best possible deal you can in order to fulfill that deal and then be able to try to seek as much relief from as you possibly can afterwards unfortunately that's the reality of life  abel files a motion under twenty eight us reception twenty two fifty five attacking his sentence or whatever he will of course he's correct about the validity of his conviction then of course she has a little bit of a different which you can't do before hand but if you do we've been asking you to do one of the words they're asking you to violate rule level the federal rules cedar and start reforming agreements by restructuring them to try to give everybody what you think is a person could have been convicted of the horrors that they suggest might occur simply don't occur but let's also look at this quote for the realistic standpoint we have cases where people are charged with crimes and get dismissed all the time it happens in the context of violations of search and seizure rights where even though all of the search crews evidence which clearly indicates arguing that they can't put her back you know let's say nothing had happened you know at least it was a plea for a certain amount of time or whatever and then it came out that that's not a crime can't you know you can't really turn people back to their prior status from that does it does change it does change where they sit in the community i mean there are terms for that i'm sure that you're aware of yes your
later oh yeah in two thousand and two that occurred was his wife accidentally got pregnant so reasonable fact finder could conclude that petitioner that the immigration official i'm sorry the family planning officials visited two to three times per week for two years but even if that weren't the case for any length of time his testimony was inconsistent because on the one hand he tries to portray that the family planning officials came to his house two to three times per week in order to require his wife to get and i would be inserted yet apparently the officials gave up which  is in violation of the family planning policy to have an i u d inserted on the testimony is inconsistent with the country reports the state that most people who live in rural areas where seventy percent of the population liv he didn't go into hiding because the house was relatively isolated and there was no one around them but then he testified that there's nowhere to hide in china anyway so an image will stay home and then he stated that although that apparently that the house where the petitioner and his wife only after the villagers informed her if they had been visiting two to three times for her week up until the time she was pregnant they would have known that i think they were facing two or three times a week ahead to the time she was pregnant i mean that's p nothing that's what he said but he also stated that his friend at home made a copy of his when i asked for it and that he didn't have the entire passport because he was in a hurry to leave but he only had one page one copy of one page passport and
not to an individual who are business there is nothing about this brick and mortar building that makes it into a brick than anything else now there are cases in and there it is i did there is a reason there is a secular reason to treat these places differently places of worship provide a whole lot more than just money and goods and services were disasters i recall going to get blood after nine eleven at church and so the legislature had a second secular and doesn't create a continuing relationship between the church and the state there is no continuing relationship and as i said
back conditions were related to an accident date of november nineteenth two thousand and eight initially the application was filed with an application with an accident date of may twenty first two thousand and eight which was the last date and if you petitioner actually worked for errors petitioner went to the doctor the next day and on may twenty second dr higgins need to look at when and counsel in his brief also argues that all the doctors except for doctor we've found causal connection between the back neck and her share and her in a more condition well they found it but i think the evidence that they had in making that decision was flawed because if you look at the histories given to almost every one of those doctors all of us doctors they all are basing that decision on the premise that b cervical and low back complaints were from may of two thousand and eight the last date she worked all the initial histories talk about  the complaints going back to may of two thousand and eight the last date she worked for us the reality is that those complaints don't appear at all until arguably october of two thousand eight with dr simon when he had death point talks about talks about having a chronic headache and migraine sensation in the form in the front of her head and that the petitioner is her f m the way one is out on november eighteenth of two thousand and eight on november nineteenth of two thousand and eight five twenty two while working as a casino dealer again that's not true there is nothing in any of the medical records between may and october of two thousand and eight that even remotely talks about you to not penalize my client work for poorly written and i would ask you to take a look at the medical closely and again although all the doctors do and i'll try to regroup since my point was brief and to get to you i've never had a situation like this but the grief so it's it's kind of new to me too difficult to actually respond to a brief that just says here's a few facts  lighted reverse of the case and then i've got to file a brief that lays out everything which we tried to do with the appropriate cases and go from there her testimony actually was or problems with the neck and back again in two thousand and seven even before winter while she was working at harrods this is the lady she started working there when she was twenty two years old she was a very young thirty six at the time of this hearing and she had a fourteen or fifteen year old boy and because it's not an issue i won't go into all the repetitive upper extremity  basis for fourteen fifteen years if you will what happened in this case then is may twenty first she wakes up at two am with vertigo and headaches and she goes to brief phone call from physical therapy once to know if that problem related and that means three of course related to the vertical and headaches and the general practitioner says no and my client testified that he told her he couldn't relate the headaches immediately goes to the human resources and worker's comp people because she's running out of time in place being terminated and saying look it's work related you shouldn't terminate me and the
charging document they charged as a burglary with an attempt to commit a theft one of the actual the charging document originally the immigration judge asked the immigration and naturalization service this was before they changed to the department of homeland security theft that's what he pled guilty to as you mentioned that's what the plea agreement also provided so why is why doesn't that suffice because i believe that he would if there is a section under california penal code for people that are convicted of attempts and that they should actually what because you're taking control of the property with the intent to deprive the owner whether permanently or temporarily and he never had any control of the property that's not enter the vehicle with the intent to steal it a point in time the burglary is in fact completed correct correct ok and he entered the vehicle with the intent to steal right yes ok tell me as time questions that the doors  i have a question for you that this is really an attempt this is a completed crime right because of the elements of the crime that he was convicted of was that he enter a likely a call with an intent to steal a crime is