government and as the states over the years with the industrialization of manufacturing jobs etc i decided that it's a very important thing now to offer educational opportunities to adults you know increase  that wanted to pass a new law saying that no one between the ages of twenty one twenty two is eligible to participate in sort of publicly funded educational program then that would be a state law the specifics rhode island's special education program but that may involve keeping someone in a regular high school it may involve some other side of the program that's all going to be governed by piece of this case is not trying  go to any program offering adult education like in your example a homeless shelter and say ok to provide those same services that you're providing to everyone else but you also have to comply with you know very burdensome forms of  this state through the normal process he's considers to be appropriate for that particular disabled student and consider before they turn twenty one appropriate they would just be in that same placement just for an additional you know year or six months so for example if you have a student who was receiving special services special education services and school till the age of twenty one and their birthday this i think relates directly to my answer to church concert so it's not it's not that you would make this specific adult education programs available to disabled students rather it's the fact that rhode island government has chosen to expend public funds and public efforts to make adult education avail means that you also have to make some form of continuing education available to disable students or students with disabilities  have a high school the degree because i was in jail i was getting a ged or some other type of high school for three days twenty one twenty two they'll be plenty of opportunities for me to get help if i'm not disabled again i think we you know that that's a very good way to look at the case and certainly the way we look at the case i would just as the again we're not talking about title one we're not talking about just reasonable access to existing programs it's a different structure is that if the state has chosen to provide opportunities to non disabled adults to complete their education they do within the full context of the  in front of the card you see the court can do what it wants to do in that regard but it seems to me it would be helpful for the district courts in the circuit because as i understand it the contours of compensatory belief are a little uncertain in this particular circuit to least determine you know that the facts of this case and meet the requirements for an award compensatory relieve if the district court feels you know you really don't what i would say is as a rough approximation you know given the mechanics of the way the track nation works i think if you reasonable say it's about six months of additional special education on average would be does not exist here that's a nonprofit and institutional school and so forth that's not here additionally in a significant portion that we have discussed and that is mercury is it's our position that public education is subject to and meet certain states