repetition of claims twenty six does not require that the data be obtained solely from the data found in the product catalogs but the building the repetition stuff was playing twenty six plainly requires that the requisition be built using the the method had to be performed by computer and my misunderstandings do you read our opinion differently that every element of the claims is required to be performed by a computer i read the language of the claim subside as well as catalogs to search you search the catalog for matching and then and then you build a repetition using the results of the search as well as their associated sources from the vendor product catalog and then you process that requisition to generate one or more of her how to how am i to understand that these claims in every element requires a computer to do it let me let me give you an example claim twenty six determining whether a selected matching item is available in inventory couldn't that be done by the user sitting in front of the computer when he looks at the results of the computers it's out then he he or she makes the determination of whether the things he's looking for is in inventory so that would be the user doing the determining step is now completely consistent with that call clearly within the time element that the user is using computer generated results to make the determination the correct but nothing computer is and is not doing the determining step the computer would not be determining anything the user would be determining based on what the computer show i'm just trying to understand  ether every single element of this claim in fact is only capable of being performed by a computer because the claim language itself doesn't make me feel like that gotta be the case i write every element of selecting the product catalogs to search is that a computer function that is performed using a computer for example making a selection through a user interface is described a capability of searching a database containing data including product vendor identification and other product information relating to mailable from at least two hundred catalogs and then the capability of creating a purchase order from a catalog without the intervening step ability or acquisition the border justified interpretation by holding that this order i processing that right position to generate purchase orders so effectively the board read out the requirement of the two separate stuff there the board next relied upon the disclosure of pages one twenty claims that the purchase order was interpreted to be representation and effectively interpreted the claim such that to two separate steps of building were activision and generating a supposedly associated with that item in the item database is not brought forward to create the repetition and fact the manual indicates that the vendor is not even required at the repetition stage i'm turning to the gateway manual the board the nationally relied upon the disclosure of page for data seventeen relating to repetitions for stopping them but these repetitions to satisfy the claim acquirement they're not created using magic item data found in searches of selected and or product catalogs these items are already in stock there is no vendor product catalog that serves the board next turn to the disclosure  the vendor and tree may be left blank in fact the purchase order section of the gateway manual confirms that the vendor need not be entering until the purchase order to creationists stage and then is done manually by the improper for several reasons first the screen displays do not like her appearance either manual depending rejections are based on the manual eleven seconds the screen displays are neither patterns or print publications we considering them well the short answer is we don't the court doesn't have to consider them it was really just a piling on the the manuals and the words of the manuals have every element in the in computer implemented i don't think it's a computer i don't think it has to be read so narrowly that it's computer implemented what the board and what the examiner said was your your your plane so they knew how to write a claim to an electronic sourcing system and didn't think the data data were database can be read as not be something contain anything that a computer i think it can i think it's  computerized systems and every time i think about understand her argument her argument is that every single element of the claim requires a computer implementation and i might be wrong but i think some of the argument folly and that's consistent with the claims are claims are not limited to the everything coming from the catalog itself but also i'd like to point out that several instances in their specifications where they talk about columns fourteen and they say to come from the date come from the catalog and have carried on the way through and through to the purchase order and there are other examples abroad example is that a three to six years starting at lin starting at line twenty nine through sorry one and this is an example where the pie in the requisition is changed from the product that came over from the catalog and there is another example of manual pricing that we mentioned in our grief that fit a three three t sitting at a computer but a human is interacting with the steps it's not accurate to say in their specifications the data comes from the catalog from the data can never be changed thank you very much thank you claim require data that they be built using data relating to selective matching items and their associated sources this data come from the data in the first claim element different items and different sources this disclosure actually relates to the conversion data elements of the claims there was a reference to page eighty three twenty six columns five lines thirty this is actually illustrate our point that i see data from the catalogue search results is electronically transmitted from the search program to the right position and purchasing system to build the requisition