good morning we have one case this morning we had a bunch of other cases and they all got pushed back to february twenty first the case of the hands numbers fifteen dash thirty eight seventy three the year of the attorney general to request a softball documents mentioning referring to nelson mandela there the district court properly denied a motion to dismiss because it said the review is a straightforward one there's no guess the regulations not to the point that it didn't tell the criminal division why he wanted i think he wants any document for  was what was difficult about your honor the agency did not even get its i understand it the agency criminal division did not even get to evaluating whether it was unduly burdensome or whether a name could be searched suggestions of information that it specifically asked he identified which division he thought would have it and then they also provided a address that he could contact and a phone number that he could contact should be any discussions to follow up the executive office of the u s attorneys your honor and i know it's not one of the two agencies that the course focused on today also responded to mr beers request and said please tell us which u s attorney's office you want us to look at that's other than reasonable position to take mr b or didn't comply with it there are shapiro doesn't speak to this issue but is the court is aware that from the district court briefs are there's a number of cases out there that says it is a failure to exhaust enough information it really doesn't make sense you are not i appreciate the course that this is i'm on that issue the need best i can do is the request is received and reviewed by different people in different agencies different the information which led to the second heart declaration which is the explanation as to why the f b i down below the f b i motion to dismiss six separate my understanding is that prior to the the second heart declaration s attorney's office depending on the nature of the case it might be handled by the department of justice in the united u s attorney's office for the middle district your honor that responsibility falls to make thank you very well sometimes if i could doesn't have any of the questions right now a couple points i did want to make with respect to the request for additional information he goes to a computer you can find all kinds of stuff with regard to mr simpson and it's right there yes so you with think that it would be just a click the fun stuff with regard christmas and we're not taking a position that is impossible to do that the agency the criminal division thought it was within compliance of their regulations to ask him to provide additional information which any number of reports have dismissed cases for failure to exhaust when somebody doesn't respond and in most of those cases the individual has included eight a name they were looking for or what type crime he might have been charged with investigated for or they were also looking for work part of the country it would have taken place in any other the case cite additional information also with respect to wh in any file so that is not necessarily limited to just him i mean it could have been you know any record of any other source you know anyone else who had been under investigation or cases were open your fiction to determine resolution of the dispute it certainly could have done that and i'm not sure what exactly the district court did here with respect to that because mr beer filed in opposition actions went to mr baier those documents have the redaction coupled with a hearty declaration that has i apologize my