this and even if that is an inconsistency even if that explanation were not acceptable explanation the next question would be whether that inconsistency goes to the heart of this  exactly where i was going also with my argument you're off the response the answer is it would but now number one she does draw the distinction she does make the clarification for the court exactly here we have a situation where that's the only explanation she's able to get out on the record we have a situation where the i j a basically shanghaied the questioning from the respondents on rather aggressively and almost guarantee a sky and of way well how can that make any sense she gets the sort of halfway house or incomplete answer as to what exactly is this distinction i'm drawing between classmates there's thirty three but there's no follow up question there's no i was looking for the question to be perfectly honest your honor i was looking for the question of why how are we to all you have is the explanation of i refer to my classmates and i also refer to acquaintances from other schools as classmates now given a greater opportunity to explain that given a greater level of sophistication on the part of the respondent given and i had to say that more probing questions from the respondents attorney here and that explanation may have carried the day however i think what we've got and again i'm going to refer back to gareth yes i think that we've got a has to do with what's a class and what's the what's an acquaintance and why she's using the term classmate differently in place one and differently in place to now as the judge i would like to define our terms i everything that has to do with development of the record falls back on the scare of the authority or had a predisposition already so that explains why the questioning isn't happening and the court in gary's vs didn't treat girls standing outside of her school and on various occasions but there's nothing to indicate that they were interested in going off and these meetings with their political i was dealing with i was dealing with a different i'm sorry i probably wasn't clear she says later on that she had a political opinion against it you said nothing happened to her she was just generic threat so i was responding to your statement that there was nothing in the record discarding saying specifically against her and asking you to react that testimony so yes ok and then she goes on to say i mean this is an ex page so they wanted to influence your political opinions and question did you have a political opinion when the only thing i have is not to be of their opinion that's true it's  judge was required so it's sort of pro forma questioning of his petitioner when she was able to satisfy the lack of credibility based on that explained it she did explain i mean if i'm talking about the people graduated me in the class of whatever year i could be talking about my own high school or everybody in the high schools the united states a year and she they didn't kidnap any of the ones who were at my school in fact when i stopped attending school all the ones who were there with me were still going there yeah that's in direct conflict with the claims that she saw her school year her classmates being taken away never to be seen again and then become that to the immigration judge and say well i'm