other attorneys i've spoken with in it is unusual for an employer to step up like this and actually sort of made it a statement in this sort of security hearing you know whether it's fear of litigation whatever they're not usually willing to step forward really backed up not only what the plaintiffs like the appellant had testified to in the hearing but also what is laid out in the medical opinions particularly doctors beam and atman unusable given his allegations on the face of it however if you look at his testimony you feel that he didn't just go in and study as a normal person which he couldn't even notes when fast because he would get so distracted we might make him one mistake in his notes and he would get distracted and missed everything there after so what he had to do was to record his notes your honor and then he spent an average of seven hours every night it does and yet when he went to keep trying use his degree i believe it was his paralegal degree he couldn't do it he simply couldn't apply what he had learn not a reason to remain to the witness to reject the testimony and i would argue that just generally speaking are generally implying that something is inconsistent again is not meeting the legal standard which is you must provide a reasoning germane to these conflicting evidence the l g gave several reasons based on all the evidence to find and mr troops complains of disability based both on back pain and mental impairments were not entirely correct credible and he set out several reasons for that there is no question that mr truly does have and has been diagnosed with some conditions low back pain and some mental impairments that do cause some limitations but the l j determined that his complaints w and there's nothing to say that you can't be taking pain medication or that you're not having some level of pain the question is was he having the level of pain to the point where he could essentially do nothing or that he was restricted to ten terry activit also noted that when the claimant wasn't paying attention or didn't think he was being watched his his complaints of pain were completely inconsistent with the manner in which he moved doctor  zero seven and one ten and basically she was not finding that he's as limited as he says he is he's able to move around freely someone with the amount of pain that he has wouldn't be able to sit up stand up and move from different positions within the examining room as he did at the time when the medical records at the time she was given treatment at the time obviously at the ale jay's hearing he made it very clear that he felt that there was an issue with drug seeking behavior and he talked about college degree whether he was in nine months time but he got a paralegal degree that was two years so i mean on one hand we've got obviously he's conning manipulating his way and he's manipulating something so why should we there are several places where she indicates in her in her observations of him he is able to move freely about and he but his testimony is that he just cannot even do minimal things that he can't sit for very long he can't stand for very long and it's just inconsistent with her observations of him over the period of time and you can have a level of pain but whether or not to the point of disabling pain that's what the elderly had to decide more before his onset but the theme of conning in manipulating his way through seems to permeate and i cannot tell you how to resolve that it's a question that the a l j really thank you first of all as i was sitting here i realized having of course found college myself a typical college student takes like maybe two three classes in a day which equates to to three maybe four hours of sitting in class and yet it took him seven hours every night to transcribe his notes once again that is actually consistent with his concentration and attentional difficulties in  adult education type bachelor's degree i think it was george fox anyway and third even though he was able to sit down in transcriber's notes best weeks to his drive and his motivation to try and actually accomplish clerk when he had originally hired on to be a paralegal it's not like oh well i believe he did leave but she had missed significant time from the job due to his back pain and she was having and that was a very sympathetic employee and i think it speaks to the you know the good nature that employer but i think you know the employer is also sorry i completely forgot where i was going with that writing and i think that's very strong evidence your honor just because it does come from the actual work environment and instead of speculation about what might happen