nor in judge levi's opinion that suggest a search warrant for the supporting affidavit is largely redacted and portions of it remain sealed to this day where the people testing the flooded city of that search warrant affidavit are then permitted or the people who made the search for an affidavit are then permitted to claim qualified immunity in this matter vast amounts of the affidavit in support of the first search warrant affidavit were remain sealed confidential informants were utilized in support of both search warrant af identities remain to this day unknown to plaintiffs and as this court has held and united states versus nielsen the affidavit must be read as a whole the totality of the circumstances of the search warrant affidavit case claim that there was a lack of diligence on the part of plaintiffs in securing the identity of the confidential informant in the march warrant affidavit but in fact the superior court judge in butte county refused to  identity you're limited in their right to test the fairness of the warrant application that is the nub of this case because we have not been afforded an opportunity to review the the the in totality of the warrant affidavits in order to assess of the circumstances to assess whether there is probable cause just leave i also wrote in his opinion that we did not separately contest the warrants but there were three different warrants that were under  examination in this case searching three different places one place of business into the personal residences of both of the plaintiffs and both of those were contested in th there was no connection to paul williams and criminal activity related to his home under any stretch of the imagination detective storen cites two solicitations for drug purchasers in the parking lot from two men two unidentified men do you know where i can buy some ecstasy they asked reports anecdotal evidence of physical contact or acts of prostitution as the county defines ip areas of the first and then the first to anecdotal evidence of a stolen car we believe it to the manager of the club but not to mr williams and when dealing with confidential informants there must be corroboration there must be first hand observation and there must be corroboration and it's on these bases that we have objected to and brought this appeal and i would like  three basic issues in the case one the waiver and vandeman of issues which has not been addressed and i thought john briefly second the issue of qualified immunity with respect to the search warrant third as a sub part of that the was that with respect to detective storm in relation to this search wolf and it is multiple search warrants for three separate two residences and a business but they were all addressed collectively at the district court level and have been addressed collectively t court so with that i would submit that the remainder of those appellee should be dismissed that leaves the issue of the validity of the search warrant in the context of qualified immunity the case last fairly well settled correct and i'm addressing it in the first instance because i actually believe this is an interesting issue that a person has denied that that windows and doors are closed but however is pled no contest to the actual prostitution on the very day in the very location rest certainly are ours and the determination of whether there was sufficient information material information in the search warrant to allow for probable cause it's several fold it involves as i would have liked it to have been in the brief and that is that with each step of the way detective storen made every effort to corroborate the information he received and i think that that is important and reading the affidavits from detective story he's  should find that a magistrate could not plainly have found there was no probable cause when you strike all that evidence i think i separate and lastly on the issue of due diligence it's clear there were insufficient what is required in order to ascertain whether there is in fact probable cause the took tallahassee of the circumstances and we just have seen you know that i would submit i thank you thank you