MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
council i'll tell most of you that the microphone in front of you is only for recording and if you would keep your voice up so everybody in the courtroom can hear and mr garfinkel how much time with you by keeping in mind that you're you're you're drawing the inferences in this bench trial in favor of your client and taking everything together his purchase a patient in the transaction the sound of voice certainly the court yesterday if not the most there was the fence in a lot of criminal cases to put it in a different context if two the defendants plan to murder somebody they don't let the third this altogether we knew the defendant was working with more than two people he knew that there was a common plan and he himself took an axe to further it and that's where we did independent knowledge of the conspiracy now we're looking at this do need to know any of that in order to participate in this conspiracy in fact it would make sense for them to hide that type of information from the person whose job is to give them a loan application to janette going to use good you might have to that the buyer had no intention of living in the property and yet he was getting an f h a loan that required it to be his primary residence and a lower interest rate and
the criminal behavior posed or constitutes a crime of violence and in this case our court said that part of the violence analogous to this is what is the for injury to the victim and sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy aside from you know battery and tearing and so on and all part of that analysis  to the circumstances surrounding the incapacitated sex right here at the district court consider the factual details of what the defendant did under thirty five fifty three eighty and ultimately fashioning an appropriate sentence without regard to what the guidelines would characterize that be sentence this individual on based upon his record of past crimes and criminal behavior as set forth in the details of the pre sentence report well i think that the district court's thinking in deciding whether or not this individual should be given maybe a little higher sentence than his word for a different kind of an assault that didn't involve such life threatening be holding i don't think the court's determination i mean there's a certain amount and i realize we're struggling with that in our jurisprudence because the certain amount of tension here between the supreme court ruling that tells us what the guidelines are no longer mandatory and arguments that we are hearing from you another good criminal defense lawyers that really wants to push us back into that mandatory system when it's to your client's advantage so i'm still trying to decide what it means under this
crime raskin that wasn't the case here they can't make an argument that there was a matching description loaned the car the pants money was taken one closing argument the stay are that  before he was actually arrested well off i would argue no one under that because they found the gun pursuant to the sort of what the ar within reaching distance of the vehicle to get a weapon or something when they agreed with the defense position that case because that's what they found was violated they also said to as you indicated one arrest is within the should mean it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the office of the arrest but in get i don't believe they ever got into the second issue so isn't can't distinguishable here he had turned out whether or not he could reach a weapon with a hope of a healthy quickness given states that people wait as well what do you make of his argument that the state's three legged leave sort of closing argument he was arrested because of a traffic stop i don't think that's true i think your argument was that they ha it's the impression i got when i started reading the breach was this is a case of transferred intent to the extent that the police officers thought they had a suspect who i think is n rounds but it wasn't mr rounds it happened to be this particular individual and just fortuitously they caught her that wasn't the specie they were looking for but  they were i think of the phrases they were loaded in crime or addressing whoever was going to come their way to investigate whether there was a robbery and regardless of whether it was a ruse or otherwise that least there was a good standard for stopping the vehicle and once they stop the vehicle they came to the sides of the vehicle inside so on plain view the evidence which they basis of their reasoning in the united states for work any kind of what's written in the first is the case i think if you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the thing one of you was mistaken about the record but the state says that they intended to told the car therefore pursuant to their policy they inventoried it where does that go or ride because another department comes in and says no we're going to take the car i mean i would venture to guess that their policy doesn't say you know everything's off or everything is undone when another department comes in to take our well so the question is then how could the municipality defend against the claim that either his firearm and the day he replaced with a b b gun or if they kept the b b gun he wanted to claim that it wasn't his because he had a firearm not b b gun so until they determine what the status of that item is how are they supposed to  has something that looks like a b b gun or a firearm or a nerf gun i mean how far do you determine what is reasonable to determine what something is the one who doesn't actually i problems with your argument is this normally when you inventory a car you in addition to inventory what the item is there is also a further distinguishing factor and that is whether it's
if it's a if if if the phone allows an admission of the allegations that have been brought against your client them and one of the allegations in the  here with of in addition to that one when issue that we think is important is that the appellate in this case is allowing that if we can't follow that statute and have jurisdiction then i just don't see how all of the rest of the arguments that the defense that fell into her opponent in this case is making have to do with facts that were never established and are really in truth being argued outside the record that system but only after the certain way now i don't want to argue outside the record so i'm not going to but if we were to do that i'm confident that we wouldn't have problems however the point is that if if somebody wants to come before this court and say in the lower court sufficient allegations of standing were made because my general knowledge of your client prevents that and it doesn't require you to read your proofs it only says that you have to state what your status is and it and you know the mortgage and and that's exactly what we get the illinois legislature  once a motion to confirm a sale it's a file that the court is required to hear that that it is no longer allowed to decide based on statutory language if you know way in response to a motion to confirm sale the court must hear that motion and confirm or deny just on the for now there is a lot of leeway in that statu sale but the issue is not whether whether the judgment should be vacated whether to sail to perth and whether justice was otherwise done but i would say that this court is if there was a real problem with justice and with the integrity of the process even where we followed the law to the letters are pleading so then we would know that because it would mean that somebody else was claiming to own this no somebody else would be trying to collect but that isn't being alleged and i believe it's not being alleged because they really go a know i don't think the
there's three points that i would like to expound upon briefly today in support of the drug courts affirmation of this case while the allegation of agency in this case has not been properly but it is agency that's no different than saying there was a contract you have to plead the elements of an agreement or agency since you know and some point you can have a an agency rise as a matter of long however when you're t economic damages can be black or should somewhat struggled with the business of supplying information for others because of the the nature of the mormon exception which we mu the other thing that  i don't know how we wished it to the point that we have but the long sure of it is that in this case the plaintive lead that he went to the baby one of the pieces of the puzzle that she wanted was an inspection
dairy farmers in vermont they've been working on this for two years today the group migrant justice and the c e o of ben and jerry's signed an agreement to implement the milk with dignity program c e o jostein solheim promise to eventually so all the company's milk through milk with dignity farmers who sign up are paid to be a part of it and must comply with the program's code which involves pay scheduling and housing standards ben and jerry  and jerry's and dairy workers are coming together to ensure human rights for dairy farm workers and the company's supply chain this is what we're calling a new day in dairy we believe is that eighty percent sourced in vermont the the
the rule is to establish one of documents exist what they say and then if they don't stay what you like them to say you can file a motion to dismiss and you can say occasionally means that the if there is no countervailing evidence you sustain your bird but the counter hearing evidence has been presented is that based upon your own documentation the assignment wasn't affected  sufficient to establish a lack of standing particularly where the plaintiff had the original no so our position is there is no  transfer of custody or the transfer of the legal was signed in the true documentation the course is the transfer didn't occur it doesn't speak but it's saying that that they didn't have that right too for clothes said to you in respect to delivery the fact that they had the dough even though it may or may not have been properly yours and the affidavit of support they're of as opposed to an offer an acceptance
braids faster than nylon strings and there it's a different temper nylon strings actually compress themselves when they're all vibrating together so it's it's much easier to yeah yeah yeah well thank you so much for setting the mood with wire and we're going to go now and make some other art with for sure we are wired and we are going to make part with wire high you've got a wonderful thing there that is fun is the narrow and yes there's nothing like a slinky they're cool if you tried kind of get wired together i'm so glad you're here the wire is a real favorite material of mine i love to make art with fire all and i just thought i knew that you were both enthusiastic about joining part of the rules although we have war we've also got a little gun we certainly have some tape and we have some other rocks and stuff so you may want to play around the other things this is really had a whole series of photographs but they weren't named and she said there is some belief that once you name a piece of artwork you're giving it more push and you're you're saying you're limiting the person that holds it a miser so
those terms or changeable and that's generally when the courts have held that a the determining factor is when the right for determining whether there's there's probably yes yes but there's no cause of action here because describing the essence of the eight malicious prosecution i mean your view say that the injury is all related to the worst in fashion there's no doubt
and then letter counseled indicates that bias left his representation and gives a quote official notification that we are making an uninsured motorist claim and a claim for medical expenses communication whatsoever between the plaintiff's their attorney and state farm and still we see by state farm on or about september twenty seventh two thousand and seven some two and a half years later a deposition testimony or otherwise as to why you lose this delay in two and a half months and there's no indicated reliance are the fact that there was d n a treatment we just know there was a two and a half year delay that's all the record the  the n d you kahlo case the court the court recognizes the clause and said that it was in forcible and therefore look to see if the plaintiff had made a demand for arbitration within the records a two suggesting that he thought the valiantly case was in excess of one hundred thousand dollars and even said i think the best thing to do with this case is current trade and i own future send you the name of my arbitrator there after there was no communication he the came back after two years and demanded he said i hereby demand arbitration this is the name i arbitrator and in court look at it and said no you didn't make a demand for arbitration you presented a claim that you had to excuse filing the lawsuit within the statutory limitations period the fifth district also said well the purpose of the limitations period in the policy was no vacation in when they please for counsel the bottom line in this case it is the the and had everything they needed in order to process the point to some assured mode of scoring and the friends i actions recognize this as well i think the defendant nowhere in the policy does the explainer give a definition of what it means to commence the arbitration defendant's position is that you have to use the words demand arbitration plain as we believe that our we'll be able to get all the medical records and all the bills to sumit in the two year period i think it's the notification within the two year period which is essential and that's what the hail core design of as well because that's what the purpose of the the to the letter that we receive soon send us the bills and records after completion and we do so and then in response we will learn the nine coverage i don't necessarily think that's a fair and i notification and i think the hail case can also be distinguished from ours is in that case in the policy there was actually language not sta there's a parish case was also cited by defendants and i don't think that really comes into play here the parish case there is no communications and all prior to the limitations period ending which is you made the transition start talking about our attrition that they said we're going to we have to strictly to construe the provision of the policy even though you're talking about our treasury in the context of who presented lying and
that all people under our law that i think it's going to have clickable it's an expert in experience stevedore working iow the reasonable care which is different from all testimony of how an expert would have reacted and what are no matter what they were doing or how much care they were taking in terms of  required under the law or what you're saying is because it's dangerous to everybody it must necessarily be dangerous to an experienced long term and that doesn't necessarily follow i think that's
my sister in law you could end the pain brilliantly i have a whole afternoon   just a moment we'll see the second act of the seasoning suspend story well of course this is a month you know when we celebrate columbus day so i thought columbus circle dog show but ferdinand's old boat was giving isabella such a rough ride and ready to live the good so that our canine queen took command of the situation and said i'll call all of my resistor spark plug and believe me that's really important for a long time automotive engineers have not only advantages of a wider spark but if there are light ignition know how to make the wide gap practical from the minute you install a wide g resistor spark plugs in your car you can count on quicker starting at low temperatures in addition the wide gap will give you a smoother engine performance with cleaner gas mixtures at low speeds or when your car is idling naturally because you can use a leaner gas make is see your nearest our light dealer tomorrow and have them install a set of those light gap ata light resistor spark plugs in your car well now would you like to know how our canine queen isabella made out at the dog show after her smooth ride with those new this is rex marshall speaking for all the light and i just a moment i'll tell you about next week suspense story but first there's a parade of some of the more than four hundred automotive parts that are the light makes in the twenty eight lands on the coast i go there got a harness in the windshield wipers and of course
when the policy was the liver to the crops and they did night sue for the breach and so september of twenty fifteen which was more than two years which was the like the statue and that otherwise be the link there should limitations is that in determining you go on and on and on until those you know something occurs the parties have an extended the statute of limitations indefinitely somebody can buy a policy you can be inadequate or or whatever somebody can enter into a contract it could be defective he can just stand mute and way forever till the unfortunate event happens before he sues and that is just just a a has a duty to know what's in his contract or to and to look at his contract but look at this policy and see with that i mean i know it's inconvenient to look at term surance damage in their prior travel with policy provided coverage for personal injury i mean person's personal injury property damage and coverage for by the injury personal injury and personal injury and property damage by winfrey personally or through property damage he american family did not provide coverage for personal injury personal injury is defined as damages liability for defamation and invasion of privacy and that's what the american in the america there's an index of the whole policy and it says right here  obligation to reading the policy because they it's just it made to cool cause an action rule of cause of action triggered by when the injury occurs the and the damage is superb damages of her being the denial of coverage with this which this case happened three years after the policy was issued it could have happened now are or aren't you know up to date or not they can do it forever and and it just depends on you know when they're damaged is there anything is there anything specific about the legislative provision in thirteen days to fourteen point four that would lead us to conclude whether or not the discovery rules should apply or shouldn't apply but you know i don't i
staring at the ceiling for five minutes wondering whether sleeping is my favorite thing in the whole world and suddenly i am a no this isn't right i am taking a shower bath in the morning i like to freeze part and take a really cold shower at the same time you get a rain is the most great drink you know how some people know everything about my mom always says that before i put my shoes on and when i do for my shoes on and look at my physics book in the sad weather i will bring it to school  i like to get a score early that way i can hold the door for a few minutes i don't know why but people always get confused when i hold the door for them they always hesitate reason then i get to school early so that i sit by the heater he is great and apparently no one but me thinks to sit here in the morning my locker is on the opposite side of the world it's always people blocking the hallway i try not to get angry and y sometimes i wonder if there's domestic violence happening right in front of my  in then i retire to my quiet place this has been one of the worst days ever and it really hasn't started thinking about sitting here all day but i guess one good thing did happen to is during the credits actually i'm a reporter you must of the new before so quick to judge someone in this room fell for that before totally different situation i'm going to look at these files
city those could be considered collateral problems for him isn't that right in the in twenty years if there's a prior drug trafficking or a drug related offense that has become final and would disappear prior who would have been the same time when
energy testimony was there at the this gun would not deposit residue on the hands of the shooter because the just begun this drug is residue towards the target so that completely
presumably there were also a lot more applicants because you combined the two hospitals inwards and they were open to competition from the other hospital and so on you don't know whether that difference at all between that and what the employer did as far as its impact on the toby employees unless he spent three way but there are from time to time fewer internal equity among the employees of south cause he testified that there had been complaints and he testified that he had prior experience of another employer where this problem arose that was completely uncontroverted evidence there was no evidence brought in to in any way challenge that the only thing that was asked of them was tell you name the person who complained and because he was looking back over a period of twelve years was an answer was no i can't identify a specific person so we
kind of observation bleeding looks like it's controlled cut doesn't seem to need stitches he's talking to people and he seems ok why is he not entitled to convey that information how could he be to liberally indifferent if he is deferring to her which seems like something that's not contested in the record so i think of it it's a different the problem is the kind of deference we're supposedly getting but what she says is not i predicated entirely on your statement that he quote looked ok how much did you talk to her you can't blindly defer if a layperson should know that you take the wrong medicine and become violently ill that's a dangerous situation in a lay person and for him that and the walk somebody has somebody with you know broken leg you know maybe maybe i would recognise they have a broken leg but i'm not sure that i would have any idea about concussion and sort of i'm a little disturbed by the lack of evidence in the record to show whether think we're talking about whether or not target a matter of thinking now it will come to the later request and he does request quite a few times and i'm not worried about the st time because he didn't talk about who he had contacted or anything so i'm certainly not concerned about that but motion proper motions for counsel the rd was in june of that europe which was two weeks after the scheduling order was put in place for two and a half weeks after the defendants answered so that rd motion was quite early in the case  hospital for that the doctors the hospital apparently did not think that was an issue so i think this is you know there are some cases where it is muddy and it's difficult to suss out what's going on but this case i think you know getting back to the council question really isn't one of them it's done usually