will focus on the commission's decision with respect to accident and causation is feed against man this way to the this appeal stems from a three one decision by the commission i emphasize th conclusively established if we if we want to look at what she testified to she was asked on direct and it's on page one thirty three one thirty four the record  but she was asked about her job theories for comcast and on direct exam to take us through a typical call and this is what she indicates well the first thing i have to do is bring your account up sometimes it pops up and on magically sometimes doesn't and i have to end through the information she's referring to the program that comcast simple not at that time that would recognize your phone number and automatically populate the screen with the customer information she continues on and says i have to try and figure out why he's having this problem was it a non pay i have to switch to different screens to find out what's going on i have to read the history find out from each previous call you're supposed to make notes when you're done and so then sometimes i have to read those notes and figure out what's going on if you requires a technician to come to the house and if you go to another screen and through can we service center according to claimant is a result expansion result of the increased call by in the amount of data entry required that's not a dispute either is that i don't well with regards to the amount of data choir whether that one mother what she was doing when they expanded the service center whether that increased repetitive duties i believe it's a question of whether she was even performing repe believe there was a monocle pinion from responding that indicated that what i'm getting at here is that with these changes that took place back comcast dr green has fin she had no idea about these changes and i know you don't have any idea about the changes nor do we heard the record have any indication of what these changes are in terms of increase decrease or stay the same or quarter i would i would argue that there is no definitive evidence that the change is i think it's exactly what commissioner white's getting at there is no evidence whether asked about what his understanding of the job theories were at the time he saw in two thousand and five and this is when she was within sight communications greeting says quote customer service representative for insight and work for that company for twenty years eight hours a day forty hours week words had set processes orders which consists of processing connex and this nice upgrades and also on later accounts her activities require through most of the day and late account work required keyboarding and word processing and other activities when he's asked to testify about what is under city of his job her job duties were in two thousand and nine he says i th i'm not trying to fault dr greene in this case but he was a tree physician before i would argue that his descriptions that he's relying on from the history of his patient are exactly the same versus repetitive trauma cases or is it repetitive from so if a person has carpal tunnel syndrome because they operate a keyboard at work as surgeries performed to relieve the carpal tunnel and becomes a symptomatic and then goes back to working on a keyboard again and the carpal tunnel flares up you saying that there's some significance of the fact that the use of the keyboards the same after the surger it was before the keyboards changed between is or so what well i mean the fact of the matter is it's the repetitive use of the keyboard because of the carpal tunnel and in this particular the grain says that she used the keyboard a majority of the time when she reported that she did and he interpreted the ad to mean more than half of the time she said work and he turns around and says his his causation and his is based on the fact that she was asymptomatic before october of twenty zero nine he's well aware that he is the surgery performed twenty five so why can't it be art repetitive trauma is an aggravation of a preexisting condition which won't that i believe dr green's opinion in this case is somewhat flawed in that for him to conclude that this is a repetitive ordinary graffiti should do a repetitive trauma when when he's in my opinion repetitive and he would mean not yet and then she said when when there was a change in ownership she did more not less that's was the point of justice absence question if she did the same there would have  he was dealing with he treated her before he treated her after he was even aware of the increased volume on so he had all the facts available to him and he rendered an opinion on that the job and as you pointed out after it became comcast those duties were what causes dr to go wade in and said that he thought so i think that when you have two opposing doctors that say a and b it is not your job to judge those things i think it's it's the commission's job they found that armature hollande put a lot of weight on the brake and he put a lot of weight on the keyboard and the commission look at that and they said we understand that but we put more weight on the that i'm not sure your honor that there's any evidence in there that that wasn't the same program it i think one thing that we're off on is yes com costs comcast for insight her job change me insight is a time or time but we only know that it went from a small rural area to a multi state area where she testified that there was never ever not people waiting in the line to talk to her breaks or otherwise i think that there's more than touching on that last aspect that whether or not the keystrokes were reduced we know that there was a change with the programs and it's not just the on magic population the brak when i'm specifically getting at is if the commission jumped to the conclusion to find causation in that they assumed that the duties were repetitive for comcast without ever relying on having any of it it's to establish definitively that you're dealing with a repetitive trauma case and i think if we if we would keep readings as to moni it's it's clear that what green's relying o believe there was an intake form that she completed which she in a cage she felt she had a repetitive trauma and i would argue that she's not qualified to even guess not a question i asked you is there anything in the record opinion is not based in your view upon the activities that she was engaged in at the time she claims she was having this injury now a yes or no that's exactly what i'm trying to get