think there are two issues before the court in this case the first is whether or not the affidavit in support of the search warrant supported nexis search the premises two zero one west a street in granger washington and the second is if it did not whether the leon good faith exception applies there are also two standards of review and one of them i think is very yes what's wrong with the use of inference well nothing in particular your honor but as the court said in thomas united states versus thomas mere suspicion or speculation cannot be the basis for the creation x seems a fair inference that if somebody was using a phony name he was probably not the landlord so so i gather that you're at least comfortable with assuming that he was the renter and that he was using a phony name  much i don't really see why it matters whether he's moved in or not he doesn't have to be living there has to be using the space true and so usually when people read something they use it and he was fact and he did it in a phony name which suggests that there is some connection between his criminal activity and the space mice and that alone enough well that's what that's what the judgment cicle  even using the premises i personally have rented many a house that i haven't gotten into the first day that i was entitle to possession so that is simply an inference again that needs to be made that that he was the tenant that he had if not moved in with at least using the premises already but more importantly i think i think the inference that really is the crux of this matter is whether or not there is any next nexus that would show between the crime that he was apparently to go but was apparently committing in the in the car the evidence judicial he says detective johnson's affidavit of february sixth indicates mr gilbert was making false driver's licenses and creating fords checks there is nothing in the affidavit that suggests that officers the officer had no conclusion in his affidavit whatsoever and they can rely on the training and experience of lease officers this officer did not put down and that he had any kind of training and experience residence and that is that inference has been based upon the conclusions and the training and experience of police officers are circuit has never said anything about how the it can for the house in question and that mr gilbert had signed the rental agreement using a different name they gave it back it seems like with all of the and the other items in his possession it seems like reasonable inference it can be drawn and i guess even even if we have if we accept what you're saying how does this not satisfy the good faith basis that the law enforcement officers ha identities and rent apartments under false identities or are doing their work in their houses that would have solve the problem you suggest that you have a great fan i've always been slightly suspicious of that kind produce an well there is no evidence that he was actually producing anything in iran or again he was in possession of these things there's no news it's very possible that somebody else could have been producing them very possible that gilbert was stopped in a stolen car he gave a false identification to the b officer stockton he had multiple checks with different names than the account numbers and that's established by the first couple paragraphs of the affidavit so they're not their accounts being utilized in a fraudulent manner and then when mr gilbert is stopped some days later he has checks with different names in those initial complaints so they are altered checks is the court has at that address thank your honor and there's a logical reference or inference that can be made ronald reagan the false person using the false name is mr gilbert it is illogical that the landlord be using a false name to rent out the residence and it's of events where he had him in a stolen car him using  on the complainants are talking about the items that have been purchased t v s and things of that nature at these various stores so these items have to be center you have first of the crime you have the facilitating aspects of the crime the devices that make these checks and make these fake i added facts in there as to mr goldman sachs they've created the nexus of why it would be reasonable to find fruits of that crime evidence of that crime at the location that was subjected to search and we have two reasonable jurists to be had wow that there is a lot of information on the crime of the nature of the crime and