unintentional so mr like you can i can i ask you whether in your view we need to focus maybe exclusively on the time leading up to when she gives him the gun from the glove box which is  actual finding that to defer to or can or should we place any weight on her actions after the shooting where she goes back to the house and cleans up the car and does other things it wasn't clear from your prefer it seemed that you were arguing there isn't sufficient evidence for the court to make that factual determination and therefore there is insufficient evidence of intent but if there is sufficient evidence for that  st aspect namely sufficient evidence to show that she did reach into the glove compartment and passed the gun to martinez before he shot him is that sufficient to infer intent from or  obviously they had they had this whole story that they just happened to be driving down th street going to the shopping mall when they saw media was isaac maybe it was christopher and decided go now or just stop by in a chaotic situation or whether they thought they were being shot at by real guns those were all in shoes that were placed for the child's age as an opportunity to weigh the conflicting evidence and determine that  it's didn't matter that just us could i ask you under the illinois statute the intent standard includes knowledge that the acts create a strong probability of death or great bodily harm right and so is it the state's position that the simple act of complying with the request give me this gun from the glove box is enough to permit the  effects too but i do think there's certainly nothing irrational bold rational about inferring that in that circumstance what else could sergio have intended with  gun other than to turn around and shoot christopher at the at the brother's generally shot up in the air to scare them i suppose he could go you know also a petition or told the police that that she and sergio had this long running feud with the rivera brothers you know she had been harassed for a year with text messages and social media messages and she even told the police that she moved out of her and to chicago in order to escape from her very mother so there was that there was the spirit that we know about and then as as judgment as you pointed out there's also this conduct after the fact that suggests you know she drove the car away she she cleared her car off to hide the fact that they had an out found an alibi by going out shopping with a friend and then she initially common design i mean i think that's right you could have a design to go rob people or something but maybe not a good design to kill them right but i think if you well if you if you look at illinois law and i can ther crime so that the trial court didn't make didn't state the wrong standard the appellate court then didn't even have to get into the common design role because it helped that it was a reasonable  house in the st place and they were taunting that rivera's the testimony was that the statements that he was in josh when it was that they were had their hands out of the window sort of beckoning them along and remember there are various are on foot or shoot in the air so i think it was certainly a reasonable inference at the very least that even even if you accept that and sure didn't know about the gun in advance and