that this conviction be reversed for two separate reasons first that the evidence failed to establish that with the intention for over facilitate stephanie's conditional defense the defense solicited on the street and here's this person who's going to stand out in his middle of the street or on a curb in a stuffed teddy bear in which any amount of runners or contraband are present and just stephanie yourself and from although even for that matter there is no indication in fact stephanie said she didn't even know where the sale was going to be taking place she didn't even know he had a scenario we don't even know if  possession of a weapon without a forward card is the mother in law you know girlfriend that's in the record here that she received i think probation for that offense so yes certainly she was guilty of something but the question and  of agreement and that's what worst one of the things we're saying is lacking that he wanted to do this he left she said i'll do that but i'm going to cation that the two of them had agreed that that principle of in situations where an accused is not present at the time of the offense sets and it's typically used in a felony murder type a situation where the situation is here or there sure she was aware of the plan but was she involved in the planning certainly there her testimony at trial was i didn't do anything i was just sitting in the car and o other issues that you brought up you're not really argument much here today was her knowledge of the material back if she was it's not on isn't there enough wasn't there enough evidence or in again  ten and that he had told the defendant at the time he was going to be pleading guilty to a felony and going to prison and although i believe also testified that after she got out of prison he and the defendant would still see each other i'm not even sure if he that nature which we don't have here but what they say with respect to accountability is that accountability focus is the degree of culpability that the only the countless he has for the principles acts when the state's evidence is basically said that guns under the hood did something like this with his hands which she i think she had a clue what that meant to him and as i said she said i called his mother and left the looking at the facts uncontested facts what that means is i'm going to do the same now and again not an indication that hotel told me to do this or that any more didn't have to be specific i mean you cited the mccomb case where they say show that and looking at the charging instrument which is how the courts have interpreted certainly they are in shows that my client is guilty of an attempt under the charging instrument so we're asking that the convicted felon makes it appear in that you know that that person is a felon i think a lot of people would be in serious trouble certainly recognizing the each other's voices doesn't establish that she knows he's a felon with respect to just like to make a comment about the idea of shared intent or common design is that certainly we're all intended to sell this weapon stephanie not only intended to sell it but she did sell it but it's a component of there's an agreement between the two of them that were well who wants her to commit this offense and there's no evidence of this and many people could have the same intent with respect to a particular act but do is proven agreement the world and stephanie and what the evidence shows is an independent act on her part that she sure she was is and certainly wasn't a general part but she did