MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
the jury had no option here but to follow the defendant guilty in addition even with problems even if there was a possibility the jury might think oh this is discipline it's not it's not that reason she could not only against the prosecution oh it clearly she should have been excused from haro she was not she ended up on the jury proceed to funnel not fashion oh no having said that when you take a look at who has the burden of raising it i think that that in this case if we look at what happened here in  and all of the forwards and all will be the problems that are associated with that being familiar with how to defend oneself in a courtroom we can service and that has a place in anything in the trials and i think that is this is  that framework they had the testimony as to what he did they have the testimony of a mark left on the grid from space they have the testimony that the step brother is the one who called the cousin one of the incident to stop i what they have is they have enough evidence at least establish probable cause for most of the battery it's all part of the state's case to explain what all went on and and again everything is was was was no no ok and she said yes that's what i've been told well carol was told that by the prosecution she's not a legal expert he's almost presenting testimony the prosecutor written in bringing this out and i think that was completely
a person's conduct is proof of a person's character traits are generally not is useful as proof that that person acted in conformity with that i mean that's essentially what you were asking him to show that his past behavior was in conformity with his behavior that day and the allegation was in fact approved and we don't dispute that the states require to prove each and every element of the fences charge so the specificity would require the state to prove it perforated eardrums as opposed to any other some of the causes that he had seen for these are drugs which include trauma infection and always he didn't investigate all these other indicated all these other causes because he won't tell you when this occurred thank you very much like
as to the evidence to be presented through  mother for whatever reason she did not tell but i know you're looking at some of the cases you know i think almost always as far as proximity kind of factor the time factor in mean the there was no way for the most part person who is intended to be called her testimony or would have to draw a response from defense counsel i've got a list of eight people here are filing a motion a lemonade all laid in the trial judge said the dr the testimony was quote devastating i'm pulling back in time from that when a defense counsel gets the state's response to the discovery to how it's produced so if you had eight names which didn't seem overly cumbersome to me and you're reading reports and you see hair right is giving devastating testimony you would think out or at some point after the state's giving you the information the state would say we're going to introduce this testimony of similar back some of the court to rule on one of those two ways it gets before the court here i don't see anything that says the court or the state has to give you a special piece of paper that says this is our notice and that's what i hear you're saying this is i know this you don't
references to what those various uses are you can see the uses quite extensive  the biggest factor in and wished possession why would he your point to defend put a fence five acres short of his own property there was there was testimony number one on the
basis under the back bring in green receivables were basically sold by transportation to the bank at a discount and the bank inflated the forseeable moves from transportation to customers given by various agreements transportation logistics in the bank basically operating under transportations able to thousand three proposal in may  with interstate gamble and through that the bad continue to receive those three percent payments from two thousand three until the crop were ordered otherwise in two thousand and ten in transportation was to pay the greater of six thousand dollars a month or three percent of my or with just six receivables factored to interstate capital and to provide monthly financial suspect that was probably discussed or they would be asked to do that i don't know but that didn't happen that they did not happen right now but did meyer logistics or gilbert meyer but was their stake in this percent that is being paid to the bank for satisfaction transportations that right well it doesn't this all boil down to once the bank replevin the trucks then gilbert miner and meyer logistics they didn't have any stake in this at all so why would they keep paying the three percent if they didn't have to use the trucks you our position our position is that the bank would not have agreed in the first place who released its claim on those but once they committed in june of two thousand three to paying three percent at that point we believe that they were liable contractually continue to pay the three percent so it's  in the other consideration his the fact that the bank did not seek to exercise total control over all those receivables that now being generated by logistics i if the part of the real price there was nothing in the white in the written made twenty two agreement that made any condition the continued use of the trucks and there was no credible substantive logistics and in principle to pay that no matter what here they only get paid as long as they believe succeeding in business and selling the receivables to interstate gamble and s was not a party superceded logistics duty under his under his prior agreement with the bank whether it was the well actually it would have been june twenty seventh two thousand the reasons clearly same business location using the same with a person that ever is a trial demonstrated a significant unity of interest and ownership between transportation logistics not the standing the technical ownership of logistics  but what was proposed was the father comes in and says i'll form a new separate entity right birth and that unity will take over use of these trucks and service in these customers or whatever and and through a combination of agreements here money will get paid to the bank and the bank the green to this being taken over by a new separate entity right that her so so i mean the bank was on it to have their attorney sent a letter saying him stop take billing write and so so beyond that your your argument is that if they didn't quit using this factor then it was
is the success that he is today the party's tax return also indicated that they're so well for the last three years with twenty eleven being the last one twenty eleven they made a hundred eighty nine to compare the individuals to compare derelict to cheryl darryl is a successful armor talented guy there he has a pilot's license half her life and although he's not making any money that and although mr salinger also earned in the lower sis in years just there is no evidence that he had one point two million dollars  other circumstances involving spouses grossly disparate earning capacity the goal financial independence is not always achievable and here i just don't see the bangle of financial independence even for those dives is very very very very tight and i really feel that the judge has discretion and and i don't know wow i did it but i feel he did because in response to your request for maintenance your opponent suggest there be no maintenance or lower amount of work i believe they suggested  doing eight thousand that and my last my last point is that for whatever reason darryl didn't turn in a financial affidavit there was a lot of discovery in this case but there was not  yeah two thousand and nine hundred eleven roughly two thousand and ten one hundred eleven two thousand and eleven was hundred eighty nine and i argue in the brief why that's a substantial ever ration dealing with seventy expenses for the following year a part of this year the first argument raised by the public in this case is the issue that there was an unfair distribution of property in fact of the marital property in this case  what a party received substantial nightmare lasts i think that's the case here the fact is that because somebody gets better not marital assets the statute doesn't say well then you have to keep a life a last says he has assumed that up to paint her two hundred twenty five thousand dollars in cash was assuming that that for the for assume a bit more each of the eighty eight someone who's come from i'm not talking about a lavish lifestyle or anything like that but somebody who's come from a family that is built itself up and has been able to enjoy the benefits of labor  a lot of it from your client something some of his ex wife twenty thousand from cash three and right and i thought six thousand dollars for me right and meet another three four five thousand here and investment income maybe even though thanks that might go toward retirement though of course the sale of the farm in the future trying to criticize that but in the year of the separation she spent her year looking for a house a new house a lake or a pot in the tub there is no evidence whatsoever experience and she had no education other than a high school education as i understand it i'm trying to court women the maintenance to four years on the theory that she could
coverage under this the and was not in this particular policy you will see that or ours are insured that declarations appear in my separate and provision of the policy that would further lemme the exposure or it would do away with exposure of all that is going to turn your attention to the other these cases are decided on a case a basis i make that point in my brain and i want to take the time to destroy it for ever and it should be destroyed phase coverage for our own one hundred thousand there is a second declaration a list another car with the limit is listed separately of one hundred available under this section under insured no risk or under more
members to the doctor appointments and running errands and basically taking care of them there was no good to see to do and the testimony of the doctor saying that there was no point there was no doctor ladder or there was no appointment card and that there was no sufficient corroboration is not testimony that simply says she wasn't here when the lunch service took place but rather they have to testify to be sufficient preparation that she was somewhere else she was in in the end she was and that was the extent of her diligence to go and buy these posts and that the their risk of losing their home she didn't make a second follow his it to the home she didn't make a phone call to the home she had white pages dot com information she didn't go to a neighbor's house to see who lived at the property none of these extra efforts were made t full possession of those throughout their time period and further corroborated by his testimony
the subject today and i would declare the meeting adjourn
i wait a minute i don't change my mind sound like ice cream an remember ah i think you dropped this last night then when told that belonged to my ad i'm so glad i was able to find you don't you something i've got to tell you what is it it's about last night there's i took the liberty of having some breakfast sent to your group i hope you didn't might not at all and i expect a tre try to pull any was black magic on me come down migrating isn't going to get us anywhere i'm going to find that doc are you crazy do anything now to make him suspicious no telling what it might do take it easy until we find out what he's up to maybe you're right but there's one thing i can do and i'm go do it right now i said take it easy all i'm going to do is try and find that generated we heard humming lately and that's an idea the old man's got a radio hidden away someplace we could sure use it let's go back to let me enlist like you said we do want to make anybody suspicious and want to let snoop around  might look so hot ok i'll go back to the house and try to get barbara away from doc long enough to find out what you were trying to tell us think you can handle alone such as right up my alley while man used to be a service you must make him talk t ghost yes she went right through there y you know about this you devil give me a gun i have no guns don't lie to me believe you or anybody else in this matter house i suppose next you in your culture will be after me next don't pretend that you don't know what happened to jaffa mac take a look for yourself that's what you got for trying to warn us whoever did it can't be far away you mean game be too far away jeff flock eyes if you look i am responsible for nothing  i decided to try this shooter who do business oh you mean those those rights of transmigration he talked about yes that's why you see he tried to transfer the admiral's information to my brain he was completely mad on the one thing that i wouldn't want to be twice
and mr bush talking probably tell you more because he was the attorney of record for my client now mrs bentley in the be getting back in two thousand and nine at that to make a long story shorter though the matter was tried contested and on october one of two thousand and ten judge souffle entered a final order that pretty much defeat up the property and money and here that to the bank in march of eleven so that's the kiss of death i think even if you assume you can have an attorney when the worst case you have to still comply with the leave statute which says register what you're arguing that it's no sense and i just i don't understand why the lawyer and part of both sides of my mouth here but but the point is i wish it would apply because i've been in the situation i've been in mr bush on issues w so question you know ok ok so even assuming this is a technical violation of the statute how does it affect your clients or it's well in effect my wife because she  may please the court the first issue which the appellate raises is whether or not attorneys liens apply and of course actions  away in addition to all those cases or cases from a district other than the the reasoning from these prior workpieces that say we're not going to allow attorneys liens in divorce cases that no longer applied because now by statute the courts we're going to press issues between did not actually find a case stating that they could be done in divorce cases that the secondary authority on the matter is far less works published in scholarly articles seem to believe that they did now apply in divorce cases the second issue is service and whether or not the service was satisfactory essentially what the statute states is that  jacqueline bentley two hundred thousand dollars by way of zation so he was as the case is referred to as he was the judge me there and the notice requirement says the case is all state and it was required is for bank and there was no complaint regarding anybody as to the method of service everyone was aware and essentially what the case law says is the service requirement is not to provide some type of technical defense by which he quietly defeated claim it is to protect someone not actually having knowledge of everyone actually getting knowledge then the service requirements are satisfied the third and final again i disagree with mr vili and there to my knowledge this family never discharge me she never had a conversation with me by which she told me she i was being discharged i never received anything right from her  stating that she was discharging me in fact i had conversations with her after she purportedly told my secretary or my receptionist that she was unhappy after i received a letter from be happy all the personal property had not yet been exchanged i finally did file a motion to withdraw due to the fact that i had not been paid i did not put in my motion that i had been terminated or fired because  to my knowledge i did not think of any idea that motion was ultimately granted by judge to a based upon the fact that i have not been paid and although the notice is to
vast difference between i made routine and somebody in life in the past week you probably know that now we start out in ten think training programs that won't be easy but i know that you all respond realizing that we're all together fighting a common  volume fallout target practice i came to the army to fight not to go to school to say this here took me years of hard work daryn and i'm proud to live up to all i represent now go get you're going to report back here and then go set up scott guy i'm a good condition i can shoot a gun  you think this is the right spot for the proving ground what's your excuse now the hole but still and the rest of them got to fix matches introduce me to tonight  be pretty moon you know you could be nice if you have tried but i'm nice you just don't appreciate me that's a crime doesn't make any difference to you that you're the most unpopular man in camp all i care about is how i stand with you you all right mcallister once more hold on to the peace this time and do it like you mean it make believe your worst enemy trying to get somebody i hate to think of somebody i hate come on now tried again oh that's great back that's wonderful who you think you know you and that you clean a start your mind if i try that no not at all go right ahead try to think of somebody you can h i told you what you get if you came over here did learn to respect the judgment of your officers in this case your superior officers feel that until you're properly trained your place is here but not at the front you know i think if you practice the thinking of the men alongside of you do i make myself clear message thank
it does come up here there's no doubt i told the regular in my opinion against the charges and it will settle i'm in court we decided to file a waiver a trial by jury against the charges which city which means the reverse is true the state came to court look at the file they saw a file and leaving the scene as well it wasn't a shock to he has to be just a little bit more if we buy bit more qualified to say under the influence of drugs and alcohol and it's not just you under the influence of alcohol you can consume and it's not that you're just under the influence of drugs a lot so for me every time i come to court they're going to give me a new chart which i should have been prepared for from their argument just because of the nature of the first charges which would to me is dramatically on air now the second and that's not fair to me on the day of trial there's one thing for certain i do not have control over the state's case i never hand they have control over their case and that's exactly what i said to judge  compose rejoinder rule doesn't apply to these traffic citations but i would say that the principles apply if somebody is trying to deviate or not be trying to circumvent a more serious charge of a felony because like i said in jackson the crow case jackson kaiser who would listen before the supreme court of illinois to indicate that rather than for the power cord because right now the the spectrum of possibilities but the biggest thing here is justice met is that to me it's just prejudice against myself my client myself to come here on the day of trial and say we knew about it from day one we took no action from day one and were hiding a pine a rule that was intended to keep a person from being charged with a more serious and yet we can go back to from trying to pare from a five in a name to the way i do and i do a lot of dui prowse and i just i do i'm going to get ready to go right on the officer you i believe that is a more of a technical experience or requirement or the witness giving testimony yes but it doesn't change the fact that there was the you can still
oh is it is it up to this court is it is easy as seen up to this court to just decide whether or not the appellate majority or the dissent got it right with respect to th issue and what i mean by this is it seems the occult majority they say they've left a quote from dime or that basically says that corporations affiliation within the state must be so continuous and systematic as to render it essentially at  whenever a corporation engaged in substantial continuous and systematic course of business in a state they can't both be right right i mean there diametrically opposed is that this court's job to just look at that and decide whether
filling in uh for me when we get back
you advocate that the rule is that even after both sides appear before the judge affirm under oath that this is their grain and everything's done except preparing in written form what has already been  as far as the agreement either party can walk away from the agreement embody or even bother to put it on the record if you make an agreement the court house you know quite why even bother then why would you just go back to your office prepared the written form and then have the body show good question in the myriad of factors that come up
that there would not be something that you brought up beatrice the point at the end of your brief on the seventy five percent eighty five percent or so of the sentence remains the same but we are the department of corrections to impose seventy five percent will be big court actually o
get the scott for you must get away yeah yeah we see what we can do situation i know your husband better than you do i think you would know  i'll make a princess out of you
grandfather testifying child spend middle three or four days every single week leading up to the bed of the mother in his home living there he had his own room he had everything set out there for i believe under the circumstances  you did i missed it it could be in there now in this case peterson doesn't make reference to a standard you dial actually refers to this manifest weight of the evidence but there's numerous cases and he's standing