MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
when you're ready would you please begin your argument possession interest make sure the bad time distinguishes this case from b or b then the next element is actual possession the defendant arguments are based on implication the defendant of the wooded area the next element of the visibly notorious exclusive the defendant as witnesses testified that the defendant nor anyone else was ever witnessed exercising any level of continuous possession of the i thought the defendant claimed that his family actually maintain repaired or through the old failed flora and tree line and erected this red share and that was part of their continues the years under color of ti north of the fence on the property in the silver room knowing that exert control over the remnants of the old fence line without committing substantial work to the property of which all the neighbors testified they were well aware of the grown up area as did the  supervisor of assessments testified that the map that was used was incorrect and outdated and that a newer map existed the map was discredit the trial court level it was proven that the numbers on the map were incorrect that's in the record page eighty four also did not present heads that the old fence friends extended in a straight line extended beyond the bridge in fact there is testimony that the defendant's father put up a fence running  opponent council said that his parents may have established ownership by adverse possession that this your client did not because it didn't that he did not do the same types of activities how do you respond  page one thirty three in the record in the transcript tells us that continuous use had been broken for twenty years i turn your attention to the transcript of question i think you testif that this sixteen foot squad has been nothing but trees and had a fence roles for at least twenty years the answer oh more than twenty years a few lines down
grade i'm to have plenty of things they don't teach in school they say about a snake oh nothing things like meg not being your daughter or even related why don't they have me i guess i'd rather whisper got up and find out the truth and the next time i hear anybody gossiping about it i'll say so i've met in the only adopted girl in the world i remember hearing him talk about it a long time ago but i've never had a man to assume you haven't been just wanting me to put out of those words since i was little you know anything why don't you two go ahead and get married while you're still young enough to enjoy talking to your mother that way are you given enough your life to make you go down to town and tell don you're ready any time  late today i had to go home first came here through act at work here that would be the quickest day time or frank i got this way a graduation i was going to give it to you and to lambert because it's a great day and because i want you to be happy rocks i told him to get off and what did he say he said i'll bet you calling me a liar i don't make something out of nothing all i said was i'll bet you bet what i'll bet he said he'd earth we're gonna live off in a film day before we're finished relieve our kids a good farm i want to clear out of these hills when i get married some twenty cents now i don't want station wagons limousine great boy when you dream you really dream good well i was working for sure a lot of guys are working on getting to the moon in iraq i think that's worth working for but i like the ground around here and i just assume keep my feet on it how much money do you say doing it none yeah not even seven hundred fifty dollars seven hundred fifty cent why not saying i was just thanking i think i did i think that's why i ran i don't know are you kidding you can put around a pretty born a storm as much as you like but when you decide on a man you come to me you'll get everything you checks in the orchard shed we can head out the back road they want h
testimony which is in the record is that she was actually injured before or pushing against the wall and it was an attempt to alleviate pain caused by her injury while i was focused mainly on whether  would have been able to easily grab on my client has also taken the position that very commonly used at this facility and other facilities are around for safety bars are actually installed on the of reasonably carefully practicing their profession should install those grab bars on that the mug in fact the record in this case is that other residents of this facility actually took it upon years prior might not be procured at that time frames of a decade but this is not new technology and the record in this case shows the interest in the new didn't know that the scheduling order which otherwise would have required experts at any given time in this case had been vacated so there actually was no expert at all this  owner of the facility require that it will provide complete architectural services including code research code compliance and coordination with reviewing the seas to get the licensing for the home i that statute requires that the design line with the americans with disabilities act really delays and the design parameters of who are there in as well as the is the point here and anyone else for that if when you took her deposition you remember said she was twenty years old that you member any of that how long she worked there what her background was anything she had no prior experience suspect what do you mean go back and check it or was aware that at times of the simpson heard or you used the word suspected number of times what exactly he met certainly the point is did you go back and look at the graph are after this accident she said no she was asked how do you know that there was no non slip finish that there was any problem with the thing as you will but whether it was too sore to somebody falls in a grocery store and can't figure out later why they fell it's because of the water or whatever course they're the ones that fell in this instance it's somebody up there's no way it is an expression is a she could ever know that there is no because it cannot be said that there is only one source of the th have an alternative time to not equal legal duty here we were given the design specifications that were in line with the american disabilities act and all the previous the federal regulations that i find it you
by his prior statements that he was not available for the purposes of you know touched down where where i don't remember i don't remember so it may just list that was enough again nothing detail not at all i haven't but some issues into a testimony or at the very least or it didn't happen here is the state didn't even bother to ask them why did you make an hearing that he had nothing to cross examine a child on the child didn't give any testimony regarding the events didn't give any said i don't remember which is affecting the freezing up especially i don't remember i don't remember but what we don't have is do you remember  statement sit down and that's the end of it it's effective trial strategy and just look at said many cases are won because the victim one of the child victim has no recollection of the event doesn't testify to anything but did something that's what makes the difference between this trial being available and not available yes what difference would that have made to cross examination is the testimony is the one fifteen ten statement not what she says a courtroom and you have to put a company with this in the chair so the defendant can drop this hearsay and that opportunity was presented here it was not presented because the minor child in direct testimony in direct testimony did not offer any accusatory direct testimony and as defense counsel you're not required to inject all of these holdings by this court and the first district and this and the fourth district so with respect to any witness testifies in any criminal trial if the witness does not directly or use the word to not sure that this would be prohibited by the rules of evidence from cross examining the witness as to the prior accusation that was made out of court merely because the witness was never if th was admitted and the only accusations that were made were the out of court accusations not repeated in court by the witness from the witnesses in this contemporaneous to the cross examination so  them so it really gets down to what was he taking at the time in the fact that he was admitted pedophile and he was making to congress i mean get your penis is it seems overwhelming what his intent was to do with a sexual nature so for those reasons if this court has no further question cross examine the witness but when you looked at the opportunity for cross examination it looked at what the witness had actually testified to and said at the vet's counsel could have a question with his base of what was offered after trial during direct testimony
do so or to be oh
we are here today to celebrate for ears of hard work and dedication from our students of high school where you are it is called this morning i know you all have worked hard i consider them truly proud to be your principal and would congratulations this year we received notification that six students from don't want to have been chosen as national merit scholar finalist these students distinguished themselves to be included with fifteen thousand finalist nationwide  private chapter at belmont high school this year we would like to recognize two members who have served the chapter with the following students who see the n the second ward is very very special person in the hearts of all the map department this award is given to the seniors who has contributed the mobs to the school community as it leads to the  initiated world history project with senior citizens and this year's recipient of the intergenerational in recognition of singular merit and not standing contributions to the success of the school work is for program and for displaying an unusual degree of loyalty and cooperation that is the aim of the school instrumental program the national school workers from award parents about music students scholarships awarded to graduating seniors for their outstanding contributions to the music program this year's recipients are and you can please come to the stage when your name is or offer band grant  this year spot like awards for theatre arts are presented to students to demonstrate a high level of achievement in acting and in technical theater production we have similar life like awards to be presented that we do we really in the first is the office of the memorial award it's given to a tennis player who best example flies the qualities of leadership ability and sportsmanship this year's recipient this year's recipient is chris music and it's awarded to the i mean newspaper thank you has won numerous awards in both above and wrestling and has shown ball role in leadership in sports doing his four years here at school it exposed his academic and athletic responsibilities very seriously to the attention of building a better life for themselves and for the family well they are here only they're going to speak english and built themselves up from being for foreigners to running a prosperous family business they were created resourceful and upgraded from a place of
says a duty to defend is based upon the allegations of the the complaint and whether or not the coverage provisions of the policy in relationship to the made policy as the issue is duty to defend right and the law in this state says that you look to the complaint and the factual allegations the plane and that you agree though that if i mean the nature company is put in a tough spot if you don't undertake a duty to defend then you're wrong the laws stops you from making claims or defenses you could have made you come in and done that that's true for your career so if this court finds that you didn't have a duty to defend then you're not going to be able to raise those defenses that you could have phrased i mean that's a really tough spot for an d as you for a potential coverage yes absolutely you think we can make that finding a fact when the court has not made that that court's order says the february five twenty sixteen order granting summary judgment on count one of plaintiffs complaint was final as to the issues of coverage and the stuff all from raising any policy well such a chance why not take the safety net deck action or defend under reservation rights i mean is that just a business decision we really didn't feel that we needed to your  was made in the program claims period that's at least one issue that you look at what's your response we would look at the complaint and see when we leave i know but
both the n t and her hearing from from that discretionary on her does the record show whether or not the university asked her why no it was permitted would that make any difference or just tell it it's absolute immunity so whether it was false or does it make any difference to the court right questions wasn't was what was it here it seems to be the case falls into the of those so you're saying it's not slander because it's an opinion in those cases that you believe that's the reason they decided the way that's that's how because i don't read those cases to say that the public
employee who is maintaining a certain degree of consistency with the system that will be used words like vested or not and they determine he gets these disability retirement i'll take each of those and turn the issues on appeal don't concern whether the court really determine the issue of whether there is an express had out for long secondly the doctrine of revestive so even if the court were to agree with us or to agree with with mary lynn and find that there was no jurisdiction based upon passage of time but back there w to allow for changes in the order not the underlying just but changes in the order to allow the relief agreed by the parties in the stage in the in the final judgment but not to modify  but i will say that i think that often the first drafts of those are pretty boilerplate but depending upon the community to which they are submitted i think their attorneys in our office that depending upon the energy to which the  submitted for approval they have their own specific provision they like to see entered and so they can often take a break in different forms but and there's no dispute that for example i believe the court's correct that this is analogous to a wider situation and obligations on them and their agreement at the time one point i'd like to address from some councils argument is that somehow mr kaminski couldn't have known that he was going to say well perhaps that's true but rights and so he certainly knew that part of his retirement benefits under the first regulations of his disability retirement and so he's charged with the with the obligation to to include those in in this in this agreement that he knows that he's not disable her certainly in order that's going to have a lifetime impact he should be charged with the allegations or lose the potential for a later disability because it's part of his retirement benefits o first so i don't think you had to be disabled at the time for him to be charged with the with the obligation to include them in the agreement there's a legitimate dispute between these parties as to whether or not this benefit is disability or retirement benefit or not a tenth of the parties that are within the marital settlement agreement i believe he's entitled to get a resolut
basically agreed with all it's difficult to say or because the first district gave no reasoning for their ruling judge wheaton did explain that she felt there was one patient calculation commonly two methods of interest calculation come out with a new interest charges that are exactly identical to the interest charges that would be computed using her interest rate there's only one of the three commonly three generally accepted methods of interest calculation in commercial transactions but read we're getting hit is the exact day interest rate or so they similar to that is that the similar or the same to the actual number of days as recently in january nineteenth two thousand and eleven in the first district court a ruling was also found that based upon this almost this exact language that this language which makes reference only to the number three sixty in no way can you know it's the three sixty five or sixty  one year whether it's three sixty five or three sixty five or three sixty three sixty it comes out to one from here three sixty five to sixty yes five or six days on to leave th bangor with over twenty years experience and we asked them what do they think that language means and they said that they think that language is either in big humans or in the movies three sixty three six your question five where we consulted with afterwards after the initial ruling in motion to dismiss who found this language to more appropriately three sixty three sixty we brought them to this court's attention but universally understood mean that it means one over the wall means three sixty or three sixty five or three sixty five but it can't mean the three sixty five for the sixteen of them he says  es thank you to sixty five or sixty five word call three sixty three sixty these were different theories as to how this language could be interpreted but earth which is never changed has been that this language and you cannot set my view to see two things well number one you have to say that this interest calculation language is unambiguous even though it never mentions the word three sixty five
and we filed affect our motion before a judge walther was filed away twenty six the same day that the defense filed their motion in the trial so it was kind of a tie that our position was of the judge obviously or doesn't provide any ability to reconsider their basic holding was the pardons agreed upon finality is there anything in this particular record that indicates that judge walters decision was final did he say this is my final decision did you know that he does he  decision is made the participant considers that final decision doesn't have to be from it we don't need to use latin why couldn't it be simple this murder actually is pretty simple by for the fact it doesn't it uses some really br  applied in the rationale of which you made relative to the arbitrator's decision because you wish to make this thing final and not give the arbitrator the opportunity the trial being brought in this case ok no i think that there is some strong evidence that the motion is to you recognize only in its freeman stances part of it is just if you have someone who is also a hypocrite and wants to take it as far as he can there isn't anything and there isn't any argument on the face of the earth is going to stop and even three seventy he's got the power to decide whether to make a motion to amend because there goes through the deal if you will he has to decide everything that is necessary to his award and they want to include liability and if the occasion arises the it becomes final bit point and then if we're going to talk about other proceedings to try to get a relief from the award this is very very limited it's either by virtue of the agreement and there's nothing here that ok when we've been done ever but you know you know you don't go if there's nothing in the act and i think the fact that there's nothing in the act that even recognize this is type of motion day because something made cool right here we didn't the court said i don't have a case anymore and then the herbage used in the death march agreement drafted by the defense all the issues that's it and
good morning ladies and gentlemen the veterans affairs disability assistance a memorial subcommittee and the subcommittee on health joint hearing health care since they are not service connected without service connection they are not eligible for other b s such as vocational real rehabilitation and employment services or housing problems don't get better they get wor they are indeed veterans and the same benefits services and burial rights as their brothers in arms the future of the military will be more reliant on the selfless service and the sacrifices of this nation daughters mothers and sister in treated we must not focus not only those who are seeking treatment but also on those who are not well women have become one of the fastest growing population studies indicate that many women veterans are simply not availing themselves thank you thank you  thank you mr williamson
production behind the scenes wescott he does a phenomenal job also agnew the executive director of the west thanks to great for bringing the kind of cover all of these games spent a lot of fun and you know thankfully we continue so we're here it's always absolute so now now you go on friday night face boxborough if probably pembroke absolutely so what you know about foxboro but we've seen him a few times including tonight we've already seen him a bunch of times and it really gritty team the hard work coach first year he's trying to build a program the same way that we're trying to build a little bit of a preview for everybody next year we're going to run a christmas time and just the boys in foxboro is going to be one of the teams that we invited to be in there now we're going to fin stuff in the offseason obviously but those are some of the things that we talked about in the coach's real good guy and he's trying to still play like the right way so they're going to be tough i mean it's no easy game out every game to challenge coach midway through the third quarter you called timeout you right i mean we just talked about like but like not letting those things be the reason why we don't do we're supposed to go back to the ball why let's not make those mistakes the ones that we worked on still hot that we don't do those things the game's not going to leave himself in dealing have really try to work towards the end of practice i said to the guys in the pre game talk about like most teams at this time most coaches are saying well we are what we are and the funny thing was yesterday a you have to be able to finish games out ok but in the meantime of different things happening you have to make adjustments to ok you always have to and so if you're not willing to do that and we practice some every day we throw different ways every day we try to an attacking and then he just went strong to the hoop i mean they were physical we were physical and that was a physical game they reached a lot and you know it's one of those things i think the referee you know is not going to call the whistle either way unless it's like super