specifically portions of the deposition pages in the exhibits and the index of the debates in other words he had specific pages with highlighted statements corresponding with each motion and affidavit and so on and indexed  claims and in a complaint judge seems to be confused as to whether or not any violations existed i believe that's the reference page for paragraph five he seems to be confused as to whether violations existed or not  judge fails to acknowledge that the litigation at a duty cation was solely based on the facts of the claims that violations did exist on the property which judge did not find and did not exist estate property they would not necessarily be visual  picked up and i'm talking to you like you're like you don't know what i'm talking about here you have it reserved any rebuttal in the red light is on when you finish your thought and then we'll hear from well i think the  think probably the whole thing probably if i have to guess and i have to speak for him is because of the time element and we didn't know how this was for spross works ok i think the whole thing basically is is he a separate entity doing his own separate irrelevant to pursue something which is no violations that's not what he's there for he's suing for damages to himself based on the violation based on the damages that were caused to another case that t based on violations that don't exist were to go to a court of superior court where they already found that there's no violations existed it's futile it's been done it's remedial it's irrelevant pointless ok good morning judges of the court of appeal's my name is catherine rule and i represent the defendant appellee ronald chill leckie in this matter mr chalak is the zoning and force an officer for the town of franklin connecticut the state this case stems from ceas desist orders issued by the defendant ronald selectee to the owner of the property new england rebuilder as the property at issue is two plots on pond road in franklin connecticut the cease and desist orders were issued non compliance including outdoor storage of abandoned vehicles as well as someone living on a trailer on the site a serious series of letters were sent to new england rebuilder is the last being on may twentieth two thousand and eight this letter also set forth that new england rebuilder is could appeal and attach an appeal form to the on the property notably all of this back and forth occurred between mr chalak in the owner of the property which is new claims could not stand the first being standing plaintiff does not have standing to pursue his claims except for his fourth amendment claim as a lessee i cannot force the rights of the owner of the property who is new england rebuild or as there's no evidence that new england rebuild was and unable to gate this case on its own news there is no evidence that they authorized the plaintiff to bring this case on their behalf the other jurisdictional basis upon which the district court dismissed claims of the defendant excuse me of the plaintiff was rightness and these had to do with the takings claims the equal protection claim and the due process claim point there was no final decision issued by the speedy trial which only applies to criminal cases eighth amendment protection against excessive bail and fines which were not at issue in this case ninth amendment tenth amendment claims which does not protect specific perhaps personal rights he also filed a claim one of the ex post facto clause which the district court properly found is not governed civil cases he also said he also alleged claims under federal criminal statutes which fail if they do not provide a private right of action he also alleged a freestanding nine hundred eighty three claim which the district court properly found could not be alleged as a freestanding claim  to expand the record to include that lease we're all very familiar with and we understand your argument that the lease provides you with standing it will consider that argument we have to look at the law in apply the rules that we understand about standing but we understand your argument including  you presented your argument very well thank you thank you both and thank your son for for coming today and assisting your father take the matter under submission and that