assistant state attorney on behalf of the people of the state of illinois really presented it in one fish but if it actually comes in in another way then it's not necessarily impactful because the information is actually i guess that's what i'm trying to say and so i don't know that i'm not sure that the trial judge's mind you're being really wasn't aware you know this information it's  away regarding after the birth of their baby and that he wasn't sleeping he was he thought that the wasn't there information about the urine on the bed and he had to change the sheets immediately and everything and then there  for him for his crime spree and change his clothing because he could be identified that way that crack i mean that's your interpretation interpretation that the doctor didn't really testify to this was because of the increasing in their review of this person's mental health history were not aware of every single thing he did and said going back years that was right a lay on the rack i that were found over a year prior to the actual incident of when the defendant was alternately or i said what the relevant they why now at the time of the incident they want that day they were no we're sustained a month before the actual incident and the offenses that the defendant committed was so irrelevant they were made again not at the time anywhere near the time of the offense as they were a full month prior and they were statements that were not relevant to your prior she went into great great detail about all of the defendant's behavior the way he was seen yet didn't she testified that right after the baby was born the first days that she was and people were coming after him she didn't believe that it was coming after him but he knew that he had been a previous gang member and she testified that he wouldn't he would not let her take their son to the home and that she testified they went to the mother's house and then she testified about how he he couldn't sleep and he was a thing and then he was treated for anxiety and then he said and this was in the record in needed to see a psych and if he wasn't acting normally he thought he'd stamp so and then she said she tried to get him to get an appointment say i just couldn't because it got worse so testimony extensive testimony in great detail but we think that she observed and terms of the defendant's behavior his actions and went about his comments so it all came into evidence and full of a reason and the judge's findings drove him to the elf told him to go to his mother's house and big heat the next week he testified that he learned that it was in a gale and he and the defendant's mother actually signed a petition to have them involuntarily committed amenable to the defense is his expert yes he also read the testimony of his wife who had been observing his behavior over a period of time certainly possible but the right was allowed to testify extensively in great detail about all of that behavior and so she was able to get that all out and present the defendants defense and their gods as a lay person making those apps or visions to support in whatever capacity i had the defendant he failed to reveal all of the records of those two days at riverside in regards to the medication and one that is just money wasn't it he did not know about the medication it was that he believed six hundred pages of documents he came up with an alternate opinion based on that when he was a child and they were asking him very specific information details about at what point what time the defendant may or may not have been prescribed a particular medication and he did not have that information on the tip of his tongue at that time so the medication but his opinion was based on his reading of the entire walk good and all of the information he was given which was inclusive of the medications that the defendant was prescribed and for many from the equation at the time the t at least in regards to music and their testifying and that even if there was it certainly did not prejudice the defense because they were fairly early entitled and allowed to present a very detailed and extensive defense in regards to our mand