initial period but sometimes they accept them contingent upon them by and then they make it retroactive so that may be what happened or are you saying that the turn in these documents the term responsible party indicate some representative capacity and there's two what about the term responsible party as simply the person that's going to be responsible for the for beale's to the  that would not allow the requirement of a personal guarantee but so yes i think you sound tempted to sign as a road as a representative as the responsible party if you agreement states that the terms and conditions agreed to ply posy you're responsible party met her and more as the license operator of the facility those are similar numbers and maybe this is most parties exactly the same in both cases the other side cited two or three arkansas supreme court cases that makes it sound like arkansas is you know the federal courts been ruling on this different state courts you're aware that you assert it makes it said the nine hundred thirty nine case in the hundred ninety four case the other side cited make it sound like arkansas st a nursing home context different than other topics it's not the same general contract law is that if there's an ambiguity it's construed against the drafter as to whether or not mr posey saw executed this agreement in his individual basti when some representative capacity is it is that good is that the determined to the issue if we determine that you signed as a responsible or individual through groups to assist the facility in providing for a residence here and there are two other definitions a responsible party that are contained in the ignition agreement but those don't agreement because he was admitted to the nursing home and receive care for approximately eleven years so it is important in terms of the third party beneficiary analysis as to whether the samsung an individual capacity or a representative mistress or intended sign that agreement will help us with the big issues especially with the audience where the federal courts are really one way right and they have for ten years as best i can tell in arkansas the state courts are basically which was another case the judge decided in favor of the nursing home in the third quarter beneficiary theory in the attrition context good goes back to my initial question what does it mean to enter into one of these contracts individually you said it means to signing the contract individually what do they what are we saying that they're bound to have a bond to the financial responsibility and my interest or not they dreamed of the first period of the admission depending on what they actually agreed to do there are different methodologies that are applied whether it's medicaid or medicare or a private place here i don't think that matt agreed to be financially responsible for the entire balance of his representative not as an individual at the very least it's ambiguous which would be construed against him are so important when mr ghauri said that the district court has this issue more or less good that you're i think that the road he claims that that means the arkansas supreme court would interpret normal contracts different than they're doing these nursing home got they wouldn't i mean there