performing other work and that such work exists in the national ok so there's three main issues st has to do with lack of substantial evidence of concentration persistence and pa problems communicating that he has there is evidence that in this corporate in particular that he is having to be asked yes no questions and summarize back there's issues the school record suggests every ten minutes is have to be checked into and monitored or coached the dad in the cousin work with him on the night shift and between the two of them they're checking in with him four to six times in having lunch with him there's also  simply shuts down and doesn't per person a store maintain pace without intervention of and he's also got sleepiness issues of probably from a variety of reasons from that medication side effects of back to school records say he needs to rest as needed when those side effects affect him but also there is the issue of his morbid obesity and so so much to progressive discipline all problems you know in terms of failing to respond appropriately to whether it's the coworkers or the work environment or otherwise as well as obviously ability to rest as now when we do that the nd issue in terms of the over at this is of daily activities this is a situation where the big picture is and they focus that the world could be burning down around them they don't even know and other people are just sort of fiddling around and you die you start your round again and start to drive and they're really not paying that much attention to it so most of what you said i'd agree with me in the notion that interview what the burden is but what he's got is is a modest part time job with accommodations and i think that for policy reasons that needs to be counted or in  terms of the substantial evidence question in terms of like the concrete evidence that this is something that is hopeful talk about moral argument as doesn't necessarily come up in briefing per se but it is the most objective thing the l j seems to point to would be the nine examiners  in terms of lack of an empirical basis for those of eat numbers and yeah it sounds it sounds ok maybe but the problem is that if you go and this is this is a footnote three hundred it could and that's an issue for debate your honor however this case does not even reach that question because the ves testimony is logically and internally inconsistent by claiming she says that she subtracts he says that he subtracts out the skill skilled jobs and the different exertional jobs and then gets to this i think it's five hundred and forty thousand some dishwasher yes your honor good morning my name's leon montenegro appearance for the defendant happily the commissioner of social security i'd like to add on to a little bit to the discussion of mr trudeau's work activities or i guess effectively supervising his side of work that i would say is more the father's choice to do so and the records from the therapist and the nurse practitioner both gave him mental health treatment both showed that mr byrne had problems with fat with his family relationships i believe his father was just scribe his father said that if someone was spoiled and it looks like that there are some problematic interactions with the family but the actual medical opinion evidence didn't extend to say the claimant needed constant supervision of the sort nor did the treatment notes at the time doctors love cohen larson the state agency psychologists who gave very specific opinions as to mr gross functional limitations said nothing about the need for constant supervision ale j pretty much adopted the opinions of doctors love cohen larson as to mental functional limitations and during the relevant period when clinton was being treated by nurse practitioner lockring i think it is and therapist m weigel they described him as being well they didn't say that he needed constant supervision they did describe him as much like a normal twenty year old going through difficulty of work and learning how to handle people it page five hundred and seventy one his work at the restaurant although not discussed by dale j didn't mention any need for constant supervision although there was little discussion of his work at the big  practitioner walkmans notes was that it was a very strenuous job and it was very tired during for him and that's one of the reasons i imagine they'll change did not find him capable of doing that job was because it would require lifting up to one hundred dollars pounds i think out and then he was having problems because of that so if he was having problems with his job at the bakery as part time job at the bakery it was because of the strain not because of any mental problems that required him to have a lot of supervision or that's impacted his ability to do unskilled work because of problems the concentration persistence or pace i think on this point your honor the medical evidence that is the top the opinions of doctors love cohen larson and including his treatment notes from nurse practitioner miss laughlin and his therapist mr weigel they all line up especially when you look at the work activity that it was actually doing and you look at it looking at all of that together there doesn't seem to be any support for ongoing mental limitations especially regarding concentration persists or pace and unskilled work or need for supervision  case going before the relevant period it's undisputed dept when he was younger that he had serious problems related to i don't know how they called it at the time asperger's syndrome were some form of autism or i think they called it a  described as having asperger's syndrome impulse control problems that get more moody but even then he was working part time at the age of seventeen that's nurse lockridge notes and as time progressed into the relevant period as i said he was working part time throughout the relevant period and his own therapist mr weigel described him as for the quote normal as a normal twenty year old having normal problems adjusting to work so it wasn't as it wasn't as bad as it was in the past although it did affect his ability to work and that's reflected in detail dates findings there were problems with concentration persistence your case was limited to still could do the jobs that the vocational expert identified now i should get to the daily activities i think it's pretty clear the daily activities that the l g focused on in a couple  paragraphs in his decision were the work activity he was doing and those spoke very pointedly towards claimants ability to work because well even though it was part time work he wasn't impeded by any kind of mental functioning limitations again it was more the physical problems and as i'm nearing the end of my time i should address the vocational expert testimony i just want to point out there that the job done if i'd buy the book a chanel expert our chain secure a job and exist in some kind of numbers and the vocational expert explained where he got his numbers from he is an expert his resume isn't the record from pages recent united three hundred and sixty two his methodology is there is expert undisputed and the job that he has done a fine are consistent with the l g s findings as a functional limitations and they're not that far off from the job to claim to be doing on a part time basis anyway although i'll point out again that the job at the bakery was an extremely strenuous job and his complaints were all about the strain again there were no months mental function limitation support of the record to show otherwise and the l g s findings were supported by substantial evidence in the form of both the medical morbid obesity wasn't mentioned in the decision nor was the fact that he was limited to less than eight hours working in seventeen hours and these things well you know underscore you know no thank you all right thank you very much