MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
next thing i knew that morning i was in your yeah i carried you all the way to big band two years i didn't know where you don't live or die i think you'll find that's right i've got some two year old and i could take a look at all right here that's all that matters kember i'm going to hold that ranch no matter what it cost we eliminate the old man you marry they go and get the right that it  i don't think there's anybody home oh that's mighty strange well i've got the cattle anyway let's go they're gone and all in fact it's going to be a real pleasure i'm going to open this but it may mean a lot to both of do you know what that means it means you're my brother my own little brother the only one you'll ever get that's my little brother ben telling you well i was telling them what you said you didn't have
trial judge saying i'm denying batson step one because i already know the prosecution's reasons and on the other hand a trial court saying i'm denying a finding of bats and step one p case because i have been here observing jury selection and the same reasons that the prosecution said they were giving when they were trying to strike for cause are reasons that i have already observed myself that i can factor into my house take assessment of all the circumstances and i find that that reason along with everything else that i've observed don't rise to the level of a prima facia inference on those different one is the judge making factual determination and the other is the judge speculating about what the prosecutor's reasons might have been your honor i think that in either situation that w porn counsel it by judge supplied reasons wasn't the court there were firing to judge supplied reasons why the prosecution acted as it did and maybe that's in a separate i'm not so interrupt your point but just to make sure just to make sure i'm understanding your position correctly you think it is permissible for a trial judge at bats in step one to make a comparison of whether the prosecution is treating similarly situated in our members similar fashion you do think it's permissible for a trial judge to look at whether there might be four people who gave  during the introductory question maybe gave the same religious belief about being able to sit in judgment of others let's imagine four percent potential jurors gave that reasons profess that religio it would be permissible in your view correct for a trial judge to examine whether the prosecutor was trying to strike one but not all of those people and the race of the people that the prost trying to strike are not shake that that's know if the trial judge can consider the answers given by potential jurors during their questioning before strikes are exercised as a matter of comparing whether similarly situated potentially potential jurors are being treated so is there any reason a trial judge could not consider potential jurors answers in deciding whether an individual e an individual who was struck is even similarly situated to other potential tried in the mid ninety's or a different district attorneys administer and involving different prosecutors and to attempt to well st of defendant has not been able to rebut the presumption of correctness that attached to the lack of proof further he has not been able to establish the state court decision was and reason
woods don't worry i'm not afraid of words of the men who write them and for me and their stupid papers for five years and for five years i've taken what i wanted in this town and out keep on taking but elections are coming my plans for jerry morgan are arranged in a way that will keep us in the clear you heard of gallagher you mean the big shot that went over the wall in atlanta yes he they just to make a new connection to be a good  organization but he hasn't had a chance to accomplish anything in my mouth on me when i don't believe i know the oriental hotel its own filth just before you get to chinatown stay out of this you really get hurt know sometimes i think these games and honest  how much is this place five dollars change your mind the name of hamlet i live at the oriental hotel you better just relax until we figure this thing  i don't know is that this gentleman trying to make trouble well i i don't know i just happened to come in here by mistake don't make any more mistakes like this either of you but somebody has got pops into my room grabs a gun and starts playing cops and robbers maybe you can you'll find it very unhealthy to try to follow  hello and change my mind i do need your help but i can't talk of the phone when you meet me somewhere i parked my car in the corner from a tree and wait for you fine i'll be the glad to help define if you come along and tell us what it's all about i don't see how i can and i'm afraid i won't be able to help be trusted young lady i was telling you  about what your story you never made a mistake there isn't any story what's this all about i don't know what it's all about myself but i do know that she's connected with carney and somewhere another friend of hers with a briefcase full of money is being held by them just say that we're only trying to help you all i can see is that you're trying to reach carney kerry what a curious arrested it will be a lot better than what canio did some you have a chance to help me better not wait until it's too late but you want to know and we can write the place can we get the evidence to convict if they've taken gerry the carnies apart and i can get in there alone i might be able to trick carney into some sort of a trap that will give us all the evidence we need at least take a look the situation over and we'll know where we stand like to use your car from my oh surely don't worry about gerry we'll get him out all right i hope so yes you're on your way more than your transportation is all arranged what do you mean transportation the agreement was that i got over the money and walk out for good while you're right morgan you're going out of the gang for good but your  trying to see you again you fascinate me  you're ready to go to work yeah ok all right you're on your own do the job your own way and take enjoying the money goes with it i didn't think you were on the level the left hand plays
thank you for my first number i'm going to sing sweetlips dedicated to the tony page love the walking are you listening ladies o no you can look three times california today last time when i signed that contract with you i thought i'd be the happiest guy on their levee of money a chance to sing clients perfect i didn't know i'd have to give up all my own plans a little phony live twenty four hours a day i didn't know i'd become public  to see that's the thanks i get for making a national hero out of a truck driver all i wanted a chance to be a normal human being like anyone else and if you think you can cheat me out of it you're crazy devil does he have to know for next month but i'm ready for that right now i'd like to tackle america's boyfriend but he might fall in love with you that he will marry some of the girl in a moment of weakness are you going to do all you're going to help in this deposit i want you to arrange a casual meeting with tony pa miscellaneous here and there is it worked still anyway you're the first girl ever walked out on me let me go oh how about a nice cup of coffee a sandwich and you and me how we could let me alone i wouldn't go quit acting like a prima donna you're going to throw yourself in front of a nice juicy stay right day i've been looking for you everywhere there was a mistake about the price yeah sure you won first prize the judges got the names mixed up when they want to look for you are gone on the level mister you can ask my girlfriend have loved every one of them darling you're a lifesaver just when i was beginning to think that life wasn't where the plug nickel in walked you and that's a man i thought was the most conceited born in the whole world he turned out to be you were going places we too  were not going let the rest of the world born in our party so you've got a job on your hands and there's no room for me in the life of american boys let's forget about him and i'm so crazy i want you folks to be the first to hear the good news tonight after the broadcast i'm going to marry the sweetest girl in the whole world i'm dedicating my first number to her to  no newest bullet this evening was doing delaney and was kidnapped by two armed men who sees her in front of the madison hole fluster into a car and drove off any person having information as to the whereabouts of mr ladywell please communicate with  when that guy comes off the floor join him
because she was incarcerated or if it was because she had disappeared or something like to him nevertheless parents are not normally deprived of guardianship if they are present and providing care and provide appropriate care for their is winning and he and he does not think he can continue care the harm the child is going to be i do know that he will be deprived of a potential caregiver who is when he could show evidence that the mother was incarcerated or that the mother had a criminal history and that it wouldn't be providing we don't have any evidence in the record that he ever revised the order or offered a product provide support for this
the first case called well but after lou in the truck for hines didn't pay the money theo and then only come up on appeal on the issue of the attorney's fees awarded him for the of the case right there
when you look at figure seven can you really tell me where little is little line that comes from the from nineteen from the over and touches the side of the sill collector but that little line that sense does this still bucket it seemed to me as his position independently of the sound cover it and that is a point that  accomplished before the cover is put in place then then the cover it seems to me plays no role whether it's characterized disallowing or holding or anything else the positioning or it could be a space in which you drop something and walk at the same speed and that's your position and that's the position of the district what i was asking is what your strongest support from the plain language  of the of the word the where the bucket sitting on the pipe on the left there now move up the upper to extend the nineteen extension if it's touching it's touching because of little lines that are drawn over from the top of the right in the housing there sort of midway down the side seem to be a budding against the the top of the upward extension nineteen if you can't push the tapered bucket down anymore because it is a budding the top of that extension nineteen yes even if the build to fifty six were eliminated or  destroyed that the bucket couldn't go any lower class is already running into the top of the extensions nineteen and there is the physical c this than then they exist but it seems to me that and i was i was not looking at the i was looking at the the right side of figure seven which is the only side that shows a bucket correctly or so and it seems to me both sides of the bucket are are touching the top of extensions nineteen and if it's not shown be it just seems to me to  be the only conclusion you can grok much like you would have a tapered dixie cup that fit into a plastic holder the side of midway down the sides of the car there is contact with the holder and you can't push that cup down anymore because it hits the whole of it seems to me that's exactly what's going on here and get a tapered bucket that fits inside this upper extension nineteen and it gets to a certain point
happened some of those scales on those dinosaurs became federal money yes and saying every other on a modern bird is a fancy reptilian scale that who is that because this is really we all know what rachel carson was saying about how we need to stop using so much so many chemicals pesticides in the mom and if she was alive today she would be concerned about all these different causes of mortality words included including global
fifty thousand students we have a high incidence of a lot of disabilities and we don't have a critical mass so that we're creating our own programs but we still have to provide for students who present certain send students and we do have students here in other clubs and they consent a lot so you don't have to be a member of a certain collaborative to access one of their programs i think la  the assistant superintendent so overseas you know with the english language director lindsay gra trying to do outreach and ferret out students who might be having difficulties before they actually become students so i don't know early age and that leads into kind of the second definition of it that we have a lot of the i serv that might be attention challenges to them so we work of that they flag us we'll begin the process of trying to screen and evaluate sometimes we do a full blown evaluation
and when the
it's a very peculiar
mentioned earlier too in regards to the billing it's important to note that it is the that mr burchill testified that he never separate out the building that mr jennings never asked him to separate the building it was all one bill he never built thousand dollars in attorney's fees for everything and it should be set up by three hundred eighty five thousand dollars but what would drop his daughter melissa got for compensatory damages in the case in north carolina that's extremely
congress wanted this is your vision it's a penny i mean the state legislature wanted to make it a blanket provision that with respect to certain being sued these schools are just like political school is doing here which washington versus seattle school district says yes seattle school district can sue the state of washington who are depriving students of minority students have an equal federal or violation claim by a political subdivision against the government entity which creates really just the right to sue but the right that says a charter school soup and be sued but only to the extent a political subdivision can be sued and my question is why should i not decide as a matter of statutory interpretation that the state legislature wanted charter schools ability to bring legal action as well as to be defended and legal action because no one has a right to attend a particular school actually that's not true with respect to trying to school the very purpose of a charter school is offer the opportunity to attend but it's a lottery system so you
her at their proceeding but they didn't but they didn't but they did not so therefore correct this is my understanding offer proof that the expert first let's put the kids are so that the forces is out of the gate if you will at that point then the expert kind of best counsel suggests go south on her do you
and here the review was the chorus and that's what the u s industry asked for a review at and that's what was initiated an administrative review of course i'm sure they're going to say to us we didn't use one of those three alternatives we just however and if you look at the hynix decision both at the port of international trade and this poor there was no discussion of different classes of sale it was a question for a single respondent in a single review could they use and plus sa are you the only one singled out for this inconsistency well this particular review covered only four instead of the do they do this by the papers as well so they've only cited one example of a situation where they actually throughout the preceding even even if the circumstances are particular aspects of the proceeding might justify one calculation for one a different calculation for another is that is that how you're reading that regulation should be using a single measure because it is much easier for the responded and for the commerce department to go in and verify the data and check it against the response as their inaccuracy here is did they fail to take all relevant relevant sales into account questioning you on zeroing as a policy in the first place well first of all you want fairness right so you want to consider the whole marketplace you want to consider the sales that are fully fair treated us even though it's now we transfer had requested that we manage to have them be pacified so that everything would look a little bit cleaner but effectively there's really no difference practically speaking because at the end of the day you still should be treated as  methodology is mandated by the statute on the first comp check or before it even reaches the question on the second prong chevron or whether it is reasonable i would have thought you would argue that the question isn't even before us because of our prior preceden well the question of whether zero is required by the statute must be considered by the supporters this court her decisions were absolutely correct in so far as the status quo that would consider any decisions in the in those dispute settlement panels consider challenges to the department's uses zero this principle has not been and cannot be disputed clearly it would have been pointless for congress to provide a different comparison method to be used depending on the treaty obligations i take it your position that congress could not by rule change it would have to be done by congress therefore or would you say that the treaty overrides the statute no absolutely not you are in fact the provisions of the you are of the cause congress had specified that the methodology used and if you're not used then you get the same result regardless of the methodology that is used by by columns that simply cannot be
she she could live in her home she still the queen of my castle sincere smile and you qualify thank you we will be back
o six b says that they knows of appeal filed before entry of the final order on a timely filed post judgment motion vote shall have no effect postpone and they say they say that's enough but do you see the very next
and her holding is that it's irrelevant so long as it instructed the view of drivers on the roadway if somebody approaching the intersection on wood street cannot see on coming traffic on your roof and vice versa so it's not so much that it's  traffic and by virtue of your inability to see that one coming traffic it represents in a reasonably dangerous condition for you it cannot be said that the roads are safe simply because that tree happens to roam from private property if  cost saving measure to protect the government against a certain actions why does that not apply here also why does it not apply here in policy or that theory because there is no one unity for the village to trial or in this case however there is a very meaningful distinction there is generally new duty for an innocent palings to reach outside of their own property to remove these instructions to force the discipline code it's irrelevant because they violated their own mormons according to the supreme court yes that stick to but nonetheless they've said and we think that that provides powerful guidance in the event a case like this were to come to a court purposes of the am were to protect the public energies in public employees from law tort liability resulting from operational gone in to ensure the public funds were not dissipated by private damage awards those are the which is what mr or just cited to the core who fall squarely squarely within these two sections you know what if if in fact the allegation twenty four accidents in five years is accurate at this particular intersection even though we don't know the nature of the accident doesn't benson will have some knowledge at this point that maybe there's a problem at this location will be the one i raise case were they talked about the similar allegations against the telephone company where there were numerous accidents involving people slamming into telephone homes that were immediately adjacent  discretionary act or not but you really can't tell from reading the dicta what what part of the tour media they were considering not only that is the fact that guess it would be redundant and become irrelevant if it's our if i was if it's our difference our condition it's in if it's on our property and it's violent evolving ordinance then there  pelly does not owe any particular individual the duty of care in the us like four or five certain preconditions are met so i'm not familiar with the case that you just discussed to comply to have so that homeowners wouldn't plant trees or install fences that would be within the triangle known this particular case it existed on private property and the they need to go in and they need to exercise their political right to vote so many in the office to get them to exercise and force the law so that your position that will come one has nothing to do with this particular period the are completely correct but what if he didn't follow just is blocking he did a vision but it's never leaves the property of the owner if there is still be a visual extension the legislature has already determined that effects the safety for motorists so that's why there
you know it's easier for us to take the that there's no kind of limit for seeking supplemental really that was one basis we had and we and we've always had for for having waited you only two situations where one has to bring such a chorus within thirty days correct so this but there were cases that were cited arguing that we had a break within thirty days on that basis and my point is that doesn't apply because it wasn't a sanctions issue it also was not based on a contractual clause and we were having a contract construed  another thing why is this particularly on point there was a malicious prosecution case and they basically said up until you've satisfied the grounds for malicious prosecution one of which is prevailing in the prior litigation one cannot seek  two there were six defenses outlined by the supreme court in heights and one of them was if it if it's not right that the court would not have subject matter jurisdiction one can bring up later the other is where you have a statutory scheme like the declaratory judgment that it specifically the state has a very serious interest in understanding what it's like though these are and i think the statute indicates that in that language that says in this case that the state needs to know whether it's on the hook for attorney's fees or not we would have appealed perhaps if we had kno yes i didn't want to repeat the circuit court's very lengthy discussion about race to the cot i agree with it but it seemed to me that it went on and on and so i simply approached the court's attention what i thought was the most important parts of that argument the case there that i think is best for me is down jupiter which is cited in both the circuit court's decision in my brief and i believe my opponents have cited as well and was a case where the feel were the give to the plaintiff plaintiff appeal word i would just note that section consists fifty five c says in any case it does not say in this case that's been something that the department has been urging that's not the language of the section as far as the impact of rodriguez won we've been trying to figure out how rodriguez ones would affect this particular petition for fees and we've put forth the two possible arguments one is that you can't use the enabling statute to invalidate a rule where they conflict that's clearly contrary to supreme court precedent when they conflict there it's invalid as a matter of law the other is an argument th that and i point that out i may have an attorney obviously i'm a practicing physician i used to be a department prosecutor you can't hear the department having power to do anything without the you can look at the supreme court decision in x and the other twenty supreme court decisions that have said it as well as many first district decisions and other districts all of the agencies powers come from