away and start process all over again or you generally like except run through machines at a time an important piece of information in regards to all this it is in regards to the height of the area in which she was placing part of the petitioner we have to perform this task that's or above shoulder let me correct myself above shoulder level at least three hundred times a day an argument here today is that two fifty to three hundred if you actually read if you read is testimony your honor he states that as far as the number three hundred i was using the number because i was a history gaev so now i have a problem if you're doing it two hundred fifty times a day let's give you a ballpark figure at least several hundred times a day what i would say first in terms of dr fletcher dr pleasure in his opinion if you look at the hypothetical that was proposed to him that hypothetical that was the basis of his opinion included a job description that job description said that he regularly to twenty five pounds on a day and occasionally lift a hundred pounds that's what he bases his causation and you know and obviously from the testimony that's in the trial he didn't do that all the hearts way that he picked up weight anywhere from two to seven and look at all the evidence this guy didn't do the petition did not do this job three times four hundred times every day there were days that he did his job a hundred times but pick up apart and put it in there one hundred times there were days that he did it four hundred fifty times and there's the top point and bottom point the top point yes that is above the shoulder the bottom point is below the shoulder there's nothing in the evidence that actually supports looking at dr weiss opinion and changes in the shoulder and then he's diagnosed by two physicians with right shoulder an incentive oh so if this isn't somebody who has a history has problems before he was working he's doing all these things whether it's  you like the v a versus three hundred and all of a sudden he's got these medical problems he didn't have before best that any supportive evidence of the claimants claims and his testimony my opinion your honor  only you could if you have to do is point out the inconsistency here and there but you're not telling us anything that says it's against the manifest weight of the act there's no sufficient evidence to support the commission's i believe that there's height so in that sense when we're looking at dr rice's testimony about lifting it or lifting his arm up to the low shoulder height three hundred times the evidence supports that that is actually occurring on the average daily basis  is correct that he had to lift you know ten pounds or whatever it was overhead three hundred times a day then i think that was either a positive or aggravating factor if you was not looking at and or if lifting significantly oh no there is x rays in the records that indicate there is no evidence of a significant degenerative condition he had no prior issues with the shoulder  burden to show that the commission was clearly wrong that the minutes weight of the evidence is against the commission's decision so for those reasons i would ask that you