you can proceed good morning and may please the court if i could ask the courts and buildings for just a moment i'd like to open with a few very brief remarks the federal appeal board should be reversed because it did not properly analyze the dividing step supporting rules and sliding time bridges in fact no such analysis is found of course decision had there been a proper analysis the board would have identified a meaningful limitation the dividing st patient scheduling that they provide meaningful i'm patient is distinct from judicial exception precedent and that they are not abstract therefore under house that one did you raise that how urgent the need is and so that these sliding time range that's defined in the dividing step that is a time range measured relative to the present so the present is always advancing therefore the highbridge is always advancing that time range is associated with a set of scheduling rules that is what we believe confines the claim to a practical application it's very specific not preemptive and therefore we believe not abstract and should also service to something more method it would be extraordinarily cumbersome and as a practical matter probably not realistic that person would have to keep lying or come rushing into the doctor's office and my bleeding profusely from enron and the others are right well so this is this sliding time region so to get abortion rules for st more to the possibility of having varying  rules apply to two different time slots you know if addition schedule so for instance if the dr has until time slots sixty days out he can be very selective and as that time slot moves and for the present s various parts of a complex procedure all arrived the same place same time and it's done by it i mean it can be used on a computer as a program but it's military units across the country and see to it that they all got to the ship at the same time for shipping over to kuwait city and the tanks came from one place and some right and it seems like a very complex logistical problem range that's my time range yeah all the divisions when i get there the same time you know ok and so as that time range advances we would have to have a portion of rules that allow for changes and  people doing it with a pencil and reach out to and the basic types of problems why they should reach out to that person and the average can be face to face so it at most coro disclose is a very gross  about person to face to face encounter they talk about telephone communication and in terms of the frequency they discussed for the higher levels they talk about multiple or frequent outr patients with face to face communication are telephonic communication is what the board with light on as effectively teaching assigning appointments it read then return to a shoe or the   correctly called this method is simply a generally directed to scheduling pace and patients based on scoring parameters this is nothing more than a method of organ organizing human activity in fact there is not even any computer limitations in the claim so the board probably saw this is simply something that could be done with pencil and paper or as you describe them in the military setting this type of thing that is just simply  fact that the claim includes certain abstract ideas like a method of organizing human activity that that should be fatal we disagree i think that alice is clear that you can have an abstract idea in the claims and still have