to an immediate sale nd that the three year period for seven remake property could be extended by three years making the sale of the hotel in two thousand and seventeen possible and that five miles w it's just run through extension so the initial nick grace period is three years which started in two thousand and eleven and with it and the year end two thousand and fourteen and then another three year extension would take to year end two thousand and seventeen twenty four million dollars and at the time the hotel had an appraised value of one hundred and ten million dollars there is now the actions of the various participants were governed by a participation agreement and appearing in service agreements they will go too deeply into th talks about making this not present value analysis for the decision to sell real property does not have that ring bridge and it however every other time that the contract talks about drilling that present value which i think is pretty clear in iraq as you look at the entire agreement in construing the contents of that agreement that every other time that the not present value is mentioned and that calculation is mentioned that literally is the consistency when different analysts are doing these calculus since and if you look at the current service agreement the occasions when the change is required to do an analysis as to whether or not it's going to make a certain had done this analysis in two thousand and eleven in two thousand and twelve when they were contractually were required to do that they would have made the determination that there was financially secure to a sale possibility which makes the pot the sill of the hotel in two thousand and seventeen a pos a possibility that could have happened and still risk regard to the actual damages suffered by five mile sector damages from the s at the bottom of the market whether that sale happen in two thousand and thirteen or two thousand and seventeen or somewhere in between and this all the witnesses here universally agreed that the hotel had not stood the test at the time that it was s the six million dollar property improvement plan i drilled for you there is they actually went back and was reading through their proof again this morning and it's a little confusing because in a couple of places they do say that it was not properly accounted failure but i don't think that  flagship and i think that that you know by the circuit court i'm very rance reversal i think you also have to look at the cash accumulation which really wasn't a droste by the circuit court this decision if you look at the evidence that was put on by dollars but fifty nine million dollars was actually distributed to the non participants and that additional money comes from what we're calling this cash on hand so there really can't be a dispute and think there's been a lot of argument about is that direct which would result in additional recovery to a claim and whether or not that was in two thousand and fourteen or two thousand and seventeen that a religious tension was a possibility it could have happened if there was enough evidence to show that it could have happened in this particular case but even if it didn't there would have been damages in two thousand and fourteen let me ask you what was your burden of proof or trying to prove damages as far as that number of patterns for convincing  there to be damages and greenspan's two thousand and thirteen number is a double that number and the council saying it was even room stand testified that there will be sufficient money for m five dollars now to recover damages in two thousand and fourteen that's that's not