temporary relief requesting temporary may then eight months later i may third two thousand and thirteen the court reserved the issue of maintenance and order dated june sixth of two thousand and thirteen the parties divorce property had been divided and allocated between the parties the parties appeared before the trial court in reference to the reserved maintenance and at that time as this corner is aware the trial court order or years of maintenance from august ten that's designed to be allocated to found appropriate during the pendency of the case to someone doesn't have control like sure that he had the pin out of his non marital think that seventy three thousand dollars comes out of his not hear him say and that's not what temporary is designed to do so the tissue in this case believe that she needed some help that her x has been made more money than she did she wasn't able to meet her needs she needed some assistance for that she needed to present happy for the poor you can't do it that's too long and that makes sense because it is meant to be remedial short term assistance i also note in this case ever downplay even if there had been a temporary relief we don't know that temporary relief  them or we don't know secondly we do know that neither party made a claim that disappears in this case evidently the marital state was preserved properly before it was distributed between the parties and so don't notice any significant change in savings accounts listed nor do i notice any change in the credit card it's out of the fifty dollars a month throughout the entire period of time was there an effort by trial coun on those two things that she said she had used her savings and that she should incur credit card debt you're cracked but the record does not reflect that in the documents present we didn't see credit card statement show expenses where in response to qantas stansell deficit and the argument at trial is that he was paying substantially more debt which was a good thing the petitioner benefited from that because that preserved the assets that were to be distributed high as ninety two thousand dollars and one year boeing was in the seventy's and my client was always likely on a western university a clerical position making around thirty thousand dollars so when the petition was filed here for his wasn't backlit busted mr van for one represented himself early on in the case and he and i with my client in fact met at the liquor county courthouse on occasion to try to resolve the went through the process of discovery and trying to come to a reasonable resolution of the case what happened was mr van hold on is reflected by the court in his capacity as a police officer was terminated or improperly writing parking tickets and the judge he who wrote the pinion  deals with that rather extensively and basically finds an issue of the imputed income and page ten of his opinion he goes into great detail as to why he believes that mr van jones having back he had a good solid well paying job that he had no control over the ability to maintain and to continue to make the kind of money he was making before and because of his own  decision i think you're somebody actually the last page of it reference some yes and from the record seems like there are some policy or something with the police department about writing tickets that he disagreed with yes that's something to do with the tickets that were supposed to be written if there was a vehicle or accidental somebody was supposed to get a ticket that's true honestly areikat i can tell you i was not part of that it would seem that from the record by the time this thing went through the final hearing in reality she was making from this by the end of sixteen she was made more than he was and again there  thought your honor says and what we only know stan here is a reason maintenance was never presented as an issue of this case was pending was because he lost his jockey had minimal income we did know where this was all going we were hoping that he would imputed income is to be a factor in this case and the respondants own behavior in losing his job is a real issue as time goes by i think you're right to raise the point and i really can't answer that so all i'm saying is that at the time it appeared the most sensible reasonable way to handle this case was to unusual case i don't know the damn thing but like this in the history of i didn't cite any i didn't find a case in order to counsel it's unusual but it is what it is and whether you know we're playing the best hand we can here so my position is  about her needs other than a statement that she said she exhausted savings and credit card debt there's no evidence