when i was really wanted to focus on if in fact there is an application for adjustment haven't and we're trying to advance that but we've been unsuccessful in getting them to adjudicate the application because he is then under final order to remove all so the application has been submitted to the department of homeland security and we have been checking on the status of it but this answers we get at the people at the window which is as far as we get in these cases with respect to view to cation th interrupted i thought what you were going to say was that the adjudication of the saddest adjustment petition was tied up with parole yes john so if we were to under the parole aspect   he would have been eligible do it just status because he left the united states and returned with permission been you're not been your entry is a raid and then your alien has been paroled regardless of whether it's determined that the degree of difficulty in that this was a basically a single incident war related in the main perhaps partially religion but then the evidence indicates that muslims who were in his traveling pack were slapped around also only not quite as badly as he was but they just wanted them out of that sector and that was an incident they are not limited to only half of the route and the offer and they operate with the past the support of the lebanese government so i don't think either we're dealing with a situation that was a single incident  and then is in part of a civil that was part of who just crossing over that we don't have to worry about it after that because as blood power has expanded since that time where the evidence indicates  allows us for proper adjudication because the situations are so fluid when we try to analyze you know what is really tell me you know movies figure out or speculate what is the real fear persecution here approach these cases where there's been that long past years time and said the passage of time is not assenting alone is not enough to diminish the fear of persecution and again because  my name is going to ferrier and i'll be representing the attorney general in this matter thank you as was recognized earlier at the government's position and in fact at this one time incident while it may have been traumatic for a at that time conditions were still up in the air that if he did it explained if he didn't fear he could avoid that fear essentially by just avoiding those checkpoints so i think that the answer to your question is it could cut either way the fact that he went back and was there for eighteen nineteen days didn't experience any problems but that was because as he claims he didn't ever have to go through any of those checkpoints but it could cut in favor of the government and the fact that he didn't experience any problems when he went back but you know the alternative is i guess that he did he leave them but i think it does show  circumstances in the petitioner it does show that they don't have much fear at that at this point and the petitioners only returned with his father also seems to indicate that as well or at least supports the immigration judges determin was not you know not ever entitled to a just man of status as that is something that is granted within the discretion of the agency and that is outside of this particular record in the asylum i would i would submit that that actually is not it's really not quite relevant to the court's consideration in the sense that the immigration judge did go online and consider the merits it almost seemed as though it was sort of an country conditions it should be sent back so that the agency can consider in the first instance to change the country conditions and the effect of also internal relocation is that was something that the immigration judge spoke by didn't actually make a much the rationale there well it seems to me as though it's the i believe that it is the immigration judge well it goes both ways i think that is the if the country conditions haven't been presented and were conditions as well and we can determine that it doesn't need to be reminded but then there are other cases which says which say that the immigration judge and the board have looked at these conventions and so that made the wrong findings that we're going to read and so that they can really look at them