please call the next day he gave an inconsistent history of the onset of back problems he was able to work full duty without restrictions any problems didn't say anything about any problems with three and a half months after the accident he did night back noted in his decision that titian or testified that he had never had a prior back pain when he was initially asked steve mentioned that he had had back pain from the the soiled incident the day before when he was asked the first time on one cross about  he hurt his back the day before the alleged attacks and it worked it's the subject of this case when he picked up a forty pound bag of soil at home now that doesn't enter into this at want all of the inconsistent medical history he's given to every different doctor i said think the only real inconsistency in his records is that july visit in which that's mentioned that he's got a year of back pain and mention that he's got a month of back pain and then i mean that record itself is inconsistent i don't know what was actually reported that time it's given to to give me history all through his report of his back pain is always going to he's had increasing back for instance this this incident he doesn't report any history of any back from to call in he does not talk about the injury and there were twenty four two thousand that you can see the commission look at this he doesn't give a consistent history to anybody well i think his history  standard of review in this case which is not really addressed by counsel in fact it appears as though he's asking you can review the facts of the case and find differently from the commission all i can see is that before the application for justin the claim was filed he was telling all of his doctors that he had had his back pain for a year for a month but this thing has been going on for a really long time and after he found the application for just en claim he starts telling his doctors oh all of you know this is all changed to soon as my accident occurred doctor story and it was not privy to any of the prior medical records and in fact i don't think that dr cole was either his reports to these  doctors their opinions of causation are based and he uses his report his his history and he's been found to be not credible by the commission and so therefore it would follow that if he's not credible ridiculous symptoms however it was the separate he had never treated for three months after the accident further on the day and the day after the accident he did not complain of any particular pain he testified that the back pain he experience after the alleged accident was different than his prior episodes but the medical records from c g h hospital the day after the accident says show that he that he stated that his back pain was as bad as it was several months ago as it is now for he stated in this group insurance forms that he had no back problems and testified that he said so at the time because he didn't think his condition was severe enough but three days later he went to the emergency room for his back and now he's asking for surgery i think that's pretty se stated his back pain was not new and he had chronic pain for a year so all of these things support the commission's decision the petitioner is not credible and it follows and i would argue that dr soriano and dr cose opinions would also be not credible since their opinions are solely based on the petitioners reports to them we have a forty pound bag of soil he reported on the day of accident that is back pain is not new he works for doing the job without accommodation or complaint for nearly four months he didn't undergo any treatment for his back except for that as a taurus in hospital and that visit to mars and hospital in july he indicated that he had injured his back for a week for a month for a year to say where the claimant proves causation was unrebutted expert medical testimony which sufficiently supports a finding of causal connection or reviewing court may set aside the commission's decision finding no causation and he quotes the phillips case but i did a little bit of research