added some molesting each of these four kids who are hundreds of times and for his own circle gratification over the many years what is clear is that david henry has never denied  telling her that he should be kept away from younger children due to multiple credible accusations regarding the other children this kind of contact over the next eight years every person who had contact with the four these kids despite now on post evidence the motion to compel was granted plaintiff motion to reconsider was subsequently denied and the plaintiffs and myself took  needed need for the defendants to take these children's opposition versus the harm or church will harm to the witness or the party who is getting this information in this case before our kids in the psychological that issue is now off the table and they may not try to establish otherwise using other witnesses in any way whatsoever the only courts have stated that to allow and this happened on multiple occasions where someone said something during the well in the emissions law says that that that area is foreclosed once that mission is is gone so that would be our position that once he has admitted that all over the place for hear that i understand and if as i mentioned in my opening riff if there were a differently crafted motion to compel perhaps this would have gone differently but this was for like i said if there had been a differently crafted word or different crafted request we might be and different state right now for right now we have orders that allow depositions on all the issues in every detail in every way and i think those orders honestly i understand the realities of the issue for most indeed i don't disagree with the issue that i believe that twenty six so wanted a balancing test under truly one c allows for an exception to the rule case i think their ability to cross examine the mothers and all of these other people who have contact is more than enough whether things happen in the children's lives you can't go into that was done until ability we believe that it was an abuse of discretion these statutes recognize the seriousness of the harm to children sustain they recognize the seriousness of the harm that the children could sustain further if forced to interact with  however they can try to act on do what david henry has gone which made it quite clear and he has never denied that he did these in the context of the asian kids is quite important but by the same proceed and sitting on the record that he may consult a bill to address any issues that might arise during the deposition if that was necessary because a point is did not show it clear abuse of discretion in order to depositions we ask you give point of shows that she knew of the need to control david and she had the opportunity to control she certainly has every reason to conduct discovery to determine from the children whether or not many times the m anything and where that all stations took place who might have been present because some of the abuse allegedly took place in a tree house on the property this is an apartment complex some of it allegedly took place in statements at the same time many wrote out a statement says that the number of occurrences might have been two before times or two to five times and later and on our go where he was undergoing treatment he said there were more instances  those problems whether the social difficulties behavioral problems often disorders poor self esteem substance abuse anxiety depression and if they had any of these problems whether those problems  different schools in four different states in the last ten years obviously we're entitle to go into the head to determine if they're claiming that there are problems as a result of all station whether they are as a result you know what the back row and what their lives are and the requirements of the you know whether or not justice requires that the depositions be taken or bar this is in relation to the protective order that could have been that the only serves to say when you can prevent a deposition from two thousand places when the deposition would pose a direct threat to human life well that we can agree on one thing in this case we should be able to agree that we don't have that life threatening the record for the record shows that the trial judge was sensitive to the unusual circumstances and was ready to be coming ball if necessary this is court simply can't assume the defense counsel had improperly during the deposition and there are safeguards protective orders that could be sought if there was any possible impropriety that could   to defend and then a fivefold even again this is a policy that has one hundred thousand dollars per current with no limit and that was the day that was the beginning and as a attorney for the players in this case we had every issue including the ones before this court today and center on trying to only do david henry's admissions which i believe ignition want does not allow believe kathy henry was married to it i suppose it's a different issue but absolutely the feds have had the same counsel throughout this entire case they've had the same defense throughout this entire case and david in michigan law is quite clear he is not