protection under the convention against torture specifically as relates to his ability to safely relocate in his home country of mexico i would just note that when they were gratian judge initially took on this matter and he was reviewing the case he said this is was close quote the board of immigration appeals when they took on this case they apply the clearly erroneous standard to the factual findings of the immigration judge in regards to whether mr was already could safely relocate to his home country how however even though the board indicated that was the review they were due we don't believe they correctly applied that review in this particular case this specifically cited cited matter a b and they said that the board me only find clear error when the findings of fact are logical possible without support an inference is that may be drawn from the facts in the record however looking at specific events in this case again we don't think that correctly or by that standard the st key event was the shooting at the border if you wanna this was there's a critic in two thousand and twelve so this was the last time that mister was already came back from on the ground one of their members actually stomped on his head and then they they indicated they were actually going to cut off his hand and it was at that point that mister has already told this group that he would work for them so eventually they let him go and that's when he pled to the united states however the immigration judge gave absolutely no weight to this event when he decided on the issue of relocation however we have to look at the fact  right you are not yet my understanding of just looking at the big picture and looking at the fact that he has to prove it's more likely than not that he would be tortured returned to her all along yes overall i think that is one factor if that goes back to that main issue more likely the more likely than not standard you know that the position i think can only say well what happens to him   in the state of mexico again this goes back to the in the region that this group would target him or his family he had just promised them he was going to work for them but instead he fled to the united states and similar to the was already so when i wrote the brief i actually cited the case of hale beholder so in that case the th circuit court of appeals did indicate that in situations where an applicant relocate in their home country because they're not physically harmed that doesn't necessarily mean it's safe to live in that particular area and we believe that's a very very similar situation as the as in the case here with mister was already  can't contain he documentation about the disappearance of misrule is already signed in mexico however on the day of the hearing the judge i think not not on purpose but i think he just had not had a chance to review that documentation again these were ninety pages of documents it wasn't like a short small exhibit but the judge still decided this matter on a steam day and again i would emphasize that the judge himself indicated that this case was close so capable of those type of violent actions so if we don't have to just rely on his leave there's also circumstantial evidence just logical inferences can be drawn that this group or after him  record i think when the when the petitioner was asked about that he gave his best understanding i mean it was impossible for him to know exactly how spread out that group is but what we're asking the court to look at is you know look at the case  glee see all the different locations mister lizard was armed i believe his neighbor also wrote a letter again this was just his opinion but the late neighbor wrote a letter indicating that he believed that this was a unit with the goal of cartel again that w evidence that he was being called by the minute if it doesn't there's no evidence of that in the record that he didn't present evidence of that in the record so well rather well for her whether it was