which rejected the opinions of a vocational expert who assumed the work history of miscued way assume the functional limitations articulated by her treating physician substantial whether that is not the kind of error free decision making process that this court  he recognizes what you just say anybody reading back that he was answering it's evidence that the insurance company ought to take into account in making the decision and because of the denial of a standard of review that the district court exercised as this court found in the the first time this case came before the to consider the actual content administrative record administrative record included extensive medical records by the treating physician dr gets on a very comprehensive report by an outside orthopedic consultant  and mr leeds responses to this recent questions the judge looked at all of the seven and considered it all and simply said that in balancing the evidence and weighing the evidence he believed that the evidence the grinch will have in its or history record which supported a finding of disability not that there was no disability were more more persuasive paraphrased i wouldn't say they're complete i don't think we've ever accepted that they are but even if we assume that they are for the sake of this argument if we assume they are  it still is only the beginning of the inquiry what we have is a balancing going we have both credential at the administrative level and then judge lou during this litigation looking at all of the evidence looking at the reports in the medical records looking at mr lee's report looking at the job description balancing it and making a determination is this woman this able to under  and the court says his responses were briefed and i think oh sure they were agree that does mean too much but then he says too we don't really know what the trial is background or experience since i think was not part of it is the kind of the things that typically you would have done on if you and i lost the ability to engage one next question we have a real hard time reading it doesn't seem like a significant limitation and i have a real hard time reading now maybe you know i'm self employed so i can get an ergonomic station get elevated and put in the location that i that i can control you know or the u s judges because you control your own docket you can control doesn't have that luxury she works in the workstation that is designed by her employer or vice similarly situated employees because it's not given position for one period of time that that's why she can't work next posturing is critical to work can she work in anything record and tell you what other agencies found in terms of the disability but i can tell you that that in my experience i've been litigating disability cases both the wrist and social disability for twenty years neck posturing these kinds of limitations frequently result in findings that person is totally disabled that's my experience because of my personal opinion that's my informed opinion you haven't either neither of the doctor station right and that's just a she could do some kind of a some kind of a job without a total accommodation which you have to redesign the whole environment around yourself things that you might have to do in your in your position