they aren't in that situation anymore and they are really more just looking at the record there has to be a division of property worth if the evidence fifty came literally there is no money to pay one party or the other to the outside ruling might be if you are saying that this transfer or this granting of shares did not follow the corporate structure because our corporate structure all right well and i will say that starting a business is in terms of family the employee he is consistent with the testimony that he been in charge of what we have parents in your being in divorce cases all the time to choose there and they're not necessarily made a necessary part correct and the fact that they're not unnecessary or not made a necessary part is also somewhat telling i think in this case because there's nothing that prevented mr lewis so from making any money in a search party but they did chose not to otherwise participate until they were called to testify in so i think the stadium the problem with the language important to know you're on any case but all truly asking this court to make alternate findings that have no bases i mean it's old or it's a hundred seventy nine now filing tony have might have had the shares of stock in her name you have to look at the intent of the parties throughout the entire marriage with respect to the ownership of a new system where there is a plausible argument started out those who sent somebody thought that i could find a serial does that mean that we should then consider her testimony even though that testimony is even inconsistent with some of the doctor i think the most telling tax and the relationship between chile and york i understand the goal is to do mutual independence of the parties but they're not risk they're not tired at the hip here julie is the lamb work almost has to do with payment and in fact if you really wanted to she could valuation reports and i think it's important to note specifically with respect to the readers and how much information they were given to do their valuation in this think it's important to note that it took a long time and many discovery motions mr cool to get the necessary documents he needed in order to complete his study which she reported and in fact the only time that he was able to speak with north regarding business was during your time with him in deposition when if you look at the flip two million dollars he took into consideration all of that with that with respect to and also with discount however in his testimony he indicated hey i have some concerns about these notes receivable you know someone's in payment see another one die the fact that the court needs to look at it is to discretion of the trial court but the court was in the best position to determine the values of the property how they should be distributed distributed between the parties which would cause the least amount of panama city to s acted arbitrarily exceeded the bounds of reason or ignored the principles of lots of it substantially justice was incurred and that is not the case in this matter norm if we're talking about what to do with the assets if the real situation here well we're trying to make sure that these