statutory definition of public body incorporates the interpretation concludes the interpretation you're arguing to score but it is the really part where the institutions  any work supported by public funds center they specifically the plans are you specifically there that we have not used any public funds at all on the specific construction project that issues there but the court said no you're still you are otherwise supported by public funds other than this construction project and therefore fit expanding the general assembly's expanding coverage of the act to projects which previously were not covered by the act that would be projects which were constructed by entities that other than other than the construction project addition would have been considered a private and i want to go back to the question earlier because i'm not sure i understand the ship  idea that the concept of law really is true that there should we should not overwork perms of words we should not  said i'm still looking for a reason from you why the phrase by any public body is there to distinguish it from what for all circumstances your honor and such as no line actually has when i hear you say i don't understand how that works you have to give me give me an project for any public funds in any way and the record was clear on that however the hospital otherwise was supported by public funds and other operations in such a circumstance the hospital again institutions or to part with public funds becoming a public body if you don't have first sense then that in that situation the hospital would that i think the construction project by that hospital would not be covered under the act because it was not a billion itself of any public financing for purposes of that construction project specifically as public works covered by the act if however you if you take the the opposing reading that the act does not extend coverage here to that to the kinds of projects which are financed by the simulated then the proper and it may overlap with why the state's interpretation is improper that's not my goal the the statute is was continues to be clear it says over and over again that the prevailing wage act applies to jobs that are constructed and they are public works constructed by a public body that's obviously paraphrasing i'm not going to read the statute to you but section three of the statute which is the provision that imposes the liability for prevailing wages in relevant part not less than the general prevailing rate shall be paid to labor employed by or on behalf of a public body engaged in the construction of a public work oh a public body and a public work that's the definition of public body is specific in the statute there is a reason for that public work also uses public body in its definition in some circumstances ok in this case the only reason the public work  are now automatically public works i concede that i agree with that the trial court found that they all agree that what the difference is is if you have a good one with finance authority financing just to be very simplistic in essence you go to i f a and they are a group you paid them hundreds of thousands of dollars to put the state of illinois stamp on these bonds have to be certain types of bonds so there's a tax exempt box you pay the money to do that in there after the sticker case why did they do that so we're going to argue about whether or not projects funded well i'm sorry i did financed through the i f a the public works we will no longer argue that that piece of the prevailing wage because there are two pieces there is the public works the public body piece that he says is off the table so we will no longer argue about whether or not and i have a finance project is a public work it is so your point your argument is that if it's a it's a public work but the prevailing wage or does not apply to a public work absolutely absolutely i'm saying this is a public work because  not think that i absolutely do not think that was the legislative intent because as has been noted by justice turner and my co counsel are counsel for a codefendant or another party i guess from her defense if they wanted to do that they should have  could have done when they were addressing the industrial binds and having an i f a to to address the sick issue they could have fixed that to the extent they wanted to fix that and make the prevailing way way to act applied to this type of project they could have said agrees so the court found this isn't a public work and it's not by a public body because there is no public work and that was not a public body in that case so the legislature said you know what i'm assuming i'm not a legislator i wasn't there but you know what what i'm thinking here is if we're going to put this through the illinois financing authority we need to take that is a public work off the table because we're work or not it's a public works because of its finances so the states that the legislature says this will now be a public works so now go back and apply this this statute the prevailing what i'm saying is there are public works that can be done with not by a public body like the mckinley foundation project ok that's the difference that's the ke buy and sell bonds that financed this project at a a tax free basis so there is no there is no tax penalty they don't pay taxes on any money they make for us repaying our genesis so the interest you interest will pay a lower interest because people are going to buy those bonds before the buy when they have to pay income tax it's like a comparable to a tax free yeah yeah exactly  style as relating to its russian project that wasn't changed by the amendments and i hate the word public body was there before it's there after and it's still there i would suggest that the change that was made by the addition of your numerate statutes in the second sentence doesn't change the fact that there always has been a dual requirement for statutory coverage of look work for a public there would still be a definition of public body and there would then be a statute in all of the sections the preferred to both public works and public body as to requirements that are necessary for coverage the fact that they didn't remove the public body in the first census of into a strong soon house this is going to be an expansion of the prevailing wage and into areas where it has not your part to be paid correct i believe the legislative history establishes what what the legislature intended to do was expand the definition of public works they believe that at least in some circumstances that expansion would accomplish additional  when the legislature went to work in one nine hundred eighty nine contain a fix works construction projects constructed for public use by a public bought back or public use of a public a public works question in terms of the coverage i believe that is what legislative history establishes but the legislative history does not establish and doesn't indicate in any way that what the legislature thought they were doing was but i think but when you put the two definitions side by side the only way to answer your question here is will be is there public funding in whole or in part and public support in whole or in part  by is as important an issue in this case as any other this is conduit financing and the financing means that no state money goes to the private entity so as to the i bonds here they were sold to the market they were purchased by individual investors the state put no money but that's true in every project that's financed by a bike and yet there are projects financed by i f a bond that meet the definition of the state you require the payment or prevailing wage or even under your interpretation that that i think there are different kinds of bond programs the particular program here is a not for profit by program but the i f a sponsors and i would say that the the kidney foundation and all of this is it we're going to come up with a decision based on just this one kid can you give me eight so mary you know my hypothetical i someone else state well i think the the i think the i f a not for the not for profit on program just a place to think about questions and there will be not for profits that do receive government money and there will be not for profit such as the family foundation  so it's going to be a for profit who receives no government funds it needs to be a private entity and i'm suggesting that the not for profit sector is an excellent example of a private sector enterprise that could receive public funds or not depending on the nature of the organization and the nature of the government commitments  a project public works even though no money comes from the state and on the public works side of the equation absolutely right or wrong so that there always has been the second side of the equation and that is is there a public buy in the