d but i would remind you that your statement of good cause was then you have to be specific and give specific reasons for good cause we were about to not be in your motion because it defendant was served with notice there could be no suspension that the secretary of state would be able to institute or impulse or confirm correct yes that's correct so how is that any precedent for what right i'll hear your client received a warning to motorists and then received the notice she quite knew that his license was going to be suspended you quite knew that was going to be suspended for six days and he knew they had to day i don't know how long it's going to be i mean what is that violation due process of because i don't know how long well it would be six or twelve months and i've got to stop with the ninety days to stop it from happening i do think that's something that can be considered if you also think that this is this should be the court's interpretation as a death for the general assembly to decide whether or not based on policy that there should be an additional but that this should be required by law as opposed to just the disc notice that he might be suspended and he was able to find with the titian to rescind the statutory summary suspension he was able by all that we do not because i mean we with us or his filing of the petition to resend is not statement of facts this issue came up in the motion to reconsider this issue was in front of the trial court and as much as we we it what officer norton the arresting officer was questioned about the manner in which these for the court was filled out he was questioned about who later provided the information he was unable to say way to provide the view from this was information that was provided to us so you're saying this was raised in front of the specifically ruled on by the trial court that i believe the quote was it is not a consideration for this court who filled out the form report it was a question of officer norton who provided the information and when when the information was provided on the me ask you this why can't the police officer the test information and sworn report that he may know to fill both but he personally has knowledge and he was witness to the events or circumstances described ok so if he has presumably the information that was in his testimony this in this one report was provided to another officer who put the citizen report that the secretary of state could process this storm report without without the place or the refusal to admit but i mean that i don't know what you but you would need presented to this court is clear that officer norton signed this one report and swore to it and then after their fact after he said that that information was added specifically the place of birth refusal you would you agree that the secretary of state would need to know in order to issue this under place a shift of certain information here for the secretary of state to issue assist the ballots as the secretary of state would and again that the two places that are missing may or may not have important that why is that situation different than what we have here i mean the boxes checked the one before it goes the secretary of state and the secretary of state is issuing a suspension based upon that box  is part of the same stack of documents it's being filled out simultaneously as the sworn report then of the police really have to be careful in how they utilize it isn't it correct and then it is fully and completely  when and if to mr bryant is the state it was in when he affixed his signature to the law enforcement sworn and that is at that time when he swore to that information it was missing critical information that the secretary of state would have needed now duration of the box was not checked listing the duration or the reason for his minimum of twelve months yes there was no there were no boxes just when the secretary of state intervention receiving everything as far as the secretary of state  the partial form to provide the motorists with notice and that finishing this one report that has to go to the secretary of state as you're completing your shift or you're dealing whether with other subjects you're  to you if you're familiar with what goes on in police departments you're handling one case maybe the next case and your as a service here's the notice you get locked up until you post bond and you go on finish your business for the night but as it turns out when you fill up the former foreman or the borders doesn't have all that information he just has what's necessary in order to of be on notice to file his petition ye so i think the but you're saying there was should require a full and complete form of the notice yes that is best one thing we would like the court to consider which i would also say came again before the court on july twentieth and a hearing for petitioners motion to reconsider that's not mention of any other time in the agreed statement offense i believe that the issue was raised at the hearing it may not have been