substantially weak and not supported by the evidence for instance there was the position i repeated the male position repeated time and again that he had been detained for six hours at a police station and in energy option police station he was bea decision the decision is completely silent as to the at the fact that some of the trial counsel the government counsel had the judge herself as often some of the gosh immigration judges to inquire of the government counsel excuse me trial attorney a would have several ok he's got this presumption but we've now got this country reports and they rebut that presumption therefore i'm going to deny the application but that's not the structure of the analysis here amounts of sufferings and persecution the coptic christian suffer in egypt yet the immigration judge chose to read the state department report which for political reasons is often skewed in favor of the republic of egypt since that is the an ally of the united states and immigration judge talked about churches being given building permits she talked about exams scheduled for schools for christian children not being scheduled on christmas and other christian holidays these were not before because the issue is none of the honour's and yet the judge took it upon herself to believe that no this was not religious the reason that he was not finding a job was not because of his faith but because of his age and addition the judge also placed great weight on the fact that the  factor that the immigration judge vision of the summit bird was that the immigration judge and her all decision of pages seventeen and eighteen used the words incredible bizarre and curious as to the event that occurred to petition o approved should be upheld by the court the emigration judge issued a very lengthy decision in this case and i think set out very well exactly the basis for her pride having found this petition to be incredible the fact that i think that the judge mentioned that this person had left in egypt as a coptic christian and she did the immigration judge did not intimate that coptic christians are never discriminated against each other she acknowledged this as a fact of life in this country however she did point out that he had lived there for almost half a century as a coptic christian he had gone away to saudi arabia yes it has at this time that it has  more intolerance toward christians but the fact that he's one of the way he was a christian when the last he came back he was a christian when he came back and he went back to his workplace and wanted to study jobs that the immigration judge found that this was this was incredible for him to say that i can't get my job back because i'm a christian when he was a christian his whole life when he left and when he came back and so the immigration judge who listens to numerous cases like this day in and day out found this to be very serious and she said and she to have good reason for it given that the facts are that this man she did not just eat the fact that he is a coptic christian and that there is discrimination in the country the judge did look also at the fact that the petitioner came to the united states and year after he had allegedly undergone persecution how do you explain his i recall reading the decision  behavior and she said that the petitioner had never made clear one he thought that these people would hang around his house for periods of time and be outstanding by car and what was it life i don't think she mentioned that fi think that she did mention that he did not seek any medical attention after this he said that he was merely bruised but  immigration judges express the credibility finding and certainly all of them a lot are aware that this court requires an expressed finding many times i have seen them an ad like to that they have a heading that says in their adverse credibility finding regarding credibility and so on i don't know that it's important that the judge say absolutely i expressed really on this record on this petition or to the incredible however in this particular case immigration judge made it clear that with regard to the claims of religion and religion based clane of the cylons she found the petitioner's argument is just to be lacking in credibility and very curious based on his coptic christian religion i agree with you i think that's what she did fine ye fun i think that's the immigration judge did make a finding regarding the credibility of the cloning she rejected all of his klein on the basis of craft lack of credibility regarding the religious alleged religious persecution and i think that she found that that even if you work radical the the