i have understood your argument to be on that doesn't the claim you were making that the claim you were making was not a direct attack on me to school i am but i did and i tack on the to see whether it is going to behave in conformance with the ultimate school call so to offset my concerns that that's inherent in your have initially which is charged with congress to bring an end to the fiscal disorder and puerto rico to as stim a revenue use to who was going to if larry eighty did not exist the commonwealth would have a great deal more money because of the discouraging effect contrary to the rule in most states out will employment for initial employees and this court has had any number of laws eighty cases are added so the legislature it despite this recommendation including a recommendation if you will from the governor chooses not to repeal  in the fiscal plan repeal of law eighty you are majorly own choices about that so i'm having a little trouble seeing how this while late the intention of concession is irrational and if it's irrational than falls into a different category and the point cannot adopt  congress did not authorize the boree to make recommendations which it hoped the legislature would follow and reasons first count one fails because the board did not force the legislature to enact labor reforms second count to sales because  i would suggest is that what actually happened here is that the board wins through the process of attempting to doing good deeds with the goal under section two along and that process broke down over the course of may and june which will lead to the board and lame june doing what it said it would have to do in the event that the contingency occurred which is the group would not take place but one last chance one last chance your honor and and so one that was not taken up your position that the board did what it was authorized to do to approve a fiscal plan and budget precisely on erm specifically on the budget because the budget is what the plaintiffs are complaining about and the budget is the only thing that the plaintiffs have standing to complain about because under section two will want to commit the legislature is not part of the development process for the fiscal plan they are expressly part of and given and will then the development of the budget but to bring this to june twenty ninth and your question specifically on that date when the legislature and the governor of failed to submit a compliant budget on june thirtieth and the determination of the oversight board an intern period for puerto rico as a result of that what happened is the legislature has asked and asked the district court to essentially route place the board's budget determinations ok thank you school plan and they the legislature is not part of the development process for the school plans and those challenges go to the board certification determinations on what is compliant with view generated by reform was not considered as part of the june fiscal plan the board concluded clearly that it needed to achieve the government needed to achieve additional savings  areas around budgeting and school needs that are really within the board's expertise and to number two it would have the effect of bargaining down of the plane and then drain the board from being able to achieve the goals and group violence that congress had set for it i'll make another point factually which is important with respect to this issue of punitive behavior by the board which lacks any foundation on the record the the federal courts actually started in the courts of puerto rico and one wonders about their capacity to handle those claims on and whether in some ways it's going to reduce the ability of the federal system to be responsive to have aware for weeks that the main fiscal plan was going to be revised if the condition on which the plan was originally said was not killed and that was the repeal of the law indeed council  of course we have not only this specific since this particular case in front of us but in writing an opinion one always has to worry out the facts on