all directly related to whether or not the search of a closed container located in an inside pocket of her purse exceeded the scope of her consent the district court's factual findings holding that the government present a clear and positive reversed in consideration of the complete factual record that was placed before the district court should leave this court convinced that the expressed object of the search was limited to stolen artwork and that miss white door to room two ninety three was opened along with him was detective brian black of the great falls city police department and sergeant dan calm and narcotics officer with the cascade county sheriff's office the factual fin capable of sitting in small places the report that he also completed on that day goes on to explain the small bronzes and he specifically identifies them he states in his report it should be noted that some of the stolen artwork is very just and i'll get to that after i filed my brief after this was ready for hearing officer eric found man who testified in federal court in front of judge had that he didn't actually say stolen artwork what he said was and the difficulty there is that this is on like i said because cases where you're trying to impeach an officer with a report this this crazy stolen artwork was actually in an affidavit that he testified to under oath falls montana and the focus of the investigation was on stolen art large bronzes large statues and by the time that they came to identify miss white born as a suspect there is nothing in the office or balance sworn affidavit testimony or his report that would identify a stolen piece of property that would fit into the mini m and m containers that were located in the inside pocket of miss white from his purse and i would refer the page seventy five on that page are pictures of the many m and m containers these containers are very small that the only thing that you could argue in this case which the government jewelry was included as part of that stolen property now of course officer bauman testified at the motion to suppress hearing that there was start stone jewelry as well and that that could have fit into the  respect to other property that structure honor and the when the when we're talking about other property the the facts of this case indicate that there was a telescope in room two ninety three which is the first room that the officers entered and that telescope was picked up they looked at it and saw a larger telescope one that wouldn't fit any methamphetamine or drugs within it and given the unique facts of this case and is there any indication that this was or the consent included i give you consent to look for drugs absolutely not in fact the district court found and detective brian black messenger thing obvious different from telling us what she's allowed on them so much i agree and but in the united states we can in this court recognize that's an individual's objection or lack of objection to a search may indicate whether or not meet we can see and hear you can use the house or just hear us i can see you you are now bright let me tell you what's going on so that you can see my eyes i will be when i look down it's because that's how i can see you is on the screen that happened is they told her that they were there investigating stolen property regarding a related case and gave her name sherry frazier and this has meaning because that was a highly publicized case in the papers it w wide i would be getting on but the figurines are probably about a half inch wide are there any pictures of those or any specific reference for those in the record just simply the description stern property in iraq and that we have you know sherry frazier are you familiar with that investigation we have heard that you were trading in drugs for storing property and we would like to talk to telescope and it's not a big telescope that you look at the i it's one of the best way i can describe it is the one that would pull out and how it would put out to his i and that box was opened in front of her and she did not ask any claim such as i didn't give you permission to look into that box so in terms of judging right she knew her and in particular in this case the issue the size she had no really expression of i didn't give you permission to look into that container are or anything of that nature so we have the description given by our sister bauman and the testimony also by black's testimony was stolen property so that's what we have to know what she objectively believed was the scope of the search in this case it's the government if someone is doing something that i don't object to overtly because of anything the officer does that i do not object to really does that mean i consent of the officer doing no your honor but the issue in this case description of figurines of mine of them two inches tall and half an inch across words that come from that's not in the record your honor that's just the investigation and what was going from the investigation gleaned by home some things go by two things if there are specific mentions of small things feel free to supplement your argument by a letter brief to the court and if you do such and if you do do that or the other searches feel free to respond thank you your honor not i'm not requiring you but i'm giving you the option thank you honor thank you steak knives and he said they were not your honor so we don't know what kind of knives they were we don't know and my time is up i want to thank you thank you very much think things both sides are very helpful arguments in the case united