context of the contempt which we have raised illness appeal i direct your attention to didn't drop any comment that she had made and she was going to give a default judgment for  typewritten transcript that was presented it was something that ironically was brought to the attention of judge by counsel for appleby and the judge concurred that we should have that and judge in my opinion had gone out of her way each time there was a motion where there was our motion or council of motion to rate me for something that may or may not have been  related to that and cases which i found and i hope i did cite them where it can be contempt but without the word contempt there is one case that i found that was in a different section on a different proposition that was before the court and i believe it was a marital situation in which it was quite disparaged between the two positions and the court found in that in his view  yours that this was in fact contempt but not having used the word it was contempt but in this case there was a request for sanctions correct yes and that's what the court indicated the  there are instances through the service corps where they just found out i'm going to hold you in contempt that's my say well maybe not but i'm going to say that you have sanctions imposed and they used the term or you would have you know our view to the situation was such that the circumstances that we were engaging in in presenting our view or in resisting they have of the opportunity to me or my client or something they were doing or not doing to the judges satisfaction to leap to where the court did that our view was far beyond what should have happened because you look through the transcripts of the two i think it's remember or woman woman number five there's nothing there that would jump up to you to say this is terrible i'm go or findings or what was going on there was a situation where we had filed a motion pardon me how actual had filed a motion to dismiss based upon aggressive pleadings that we had filed it was dismissed with and that we would have the section about one point six and that we had the benefit of one point six that it shouldn't be stressed well given that i filed another motion similar to that but raising those issues or cases that relate to one point six a professional responsibility that in some respects is saying here judge i'm giving you a chance to look at this you didn't look at this when you reach your decision officially and this needs to have some l the judge indicated that you know you don't fit into this and i'm going to dismiss your pleading well with my exasperated ssion and i guess hers i came back with one point serves and tried to show it isn't just you know one circumstances it isn't just one doesn't occur attorney client relationship there are other restrictions or cases that the judge in that order has every right to restrict not producing that information he cuz it's confidential it's confidential well we were compelled to give it and will be restricted and so my or the judge responded turns out because of the relationship of the parties involved in this the put you should read did that do anything other than stand aside because of the relationship of the families or whatever it not and more i don't know what more i can see the case that one case is for sixty four seizure and second eight seventy three in which it indicate to you about the difference oh the two attorney client privilege and the one about who should really ship another one that was later so i don't think it was  video landed and when you order it is relying on a lamb a lamb lamb and i couldn't get the door open it's not a lamb lamb lamb under these circumstances because there are exceptions for oh i'm going to be home contempt so he did in fact hear that but again it shouldn't have been under way and i think the fact that lamb was limited to the attorney client privilege and to the exception which is as i indicated the relationship and the fact that it's just there in so far is again i could spend it goes back to what i said earlier about similar back some more patients someone she in that case his or her contempt but in fact it was because we by the sanction having to pay it's interesting thing and this is on page three of our brief court we had a motion for substitution of judge and in looking at what you had she took at physically crummy i'm not going to deal with this so i figure another day and we're going to go over this no it was done it was denied that's probably the first or second time i've had something like that were right i was unable to communicate no matter how woefully poor my argument would have been to at least say this isn't something you should do please let me i view this i didn't get these are types of things we have to deal with and it's got to be his new contemptuous i don't know how it could be anything else we came down to some of the other things where anything and i time my present time has appeared my motion for substitution of judge was to bring it back to a level playing field and when you have read that how about  the beginning kind of explain what my understanding of the facts is here today and what i think the record accurately reflects we thought we first we had a discovery  case i filed a motion for a pardon me a subpoena of the attorneys five i received a motion to quash i said the case which i was going to realign th to rule out in my opinion in my favor mr murray last time to submit a petition additional case law but then he said you have it there by the end of the day we can have it both by judge makes a ruling in my favor the very next day after the judge's ruling so to speak to submit additional heysel if i please we were set for a period we're already hearing on november fifteenth and the judge said to mr o'connor and ask him you know well we're going to raise the privilege issue is there anything in the fall that that's privileged is there any work product in that file i wasn't given anything that i did not already have the judge on the simpler thirty first set this is needless reading you raised an issue four five times for my court for no reason appeal today is the sanctions issue or the sanction the order of december thirty first of two thousand and twelve mr mirandize attempting to piggyback other issues on that without explaining how this court even if there is a contempt finding which there's is trying to piggyback the other of these other issues on without explaining how we can do but he followed the motion for sanctions he did follow response to one of the claims we filed against the state but he did not file for the recovery citation he has this motion for sanctions for my client being a layperson doesn't understand what these are  don't have a reason to go you know for the one thirty seven sanctioned i don't think that if the court order is the boy and i will i will concede that the courts orders the board and i think i explained that every why it was difficult  to write this order mr morale was not happy about it he was being somewhat orating to me and i think we went through two or three vet before we could agree on the language that with x e n u order that i wrote yes i will admit that's my poor bolivia that due to the order being the board of the specificity is required by supreme court rule one thirty seven i don't think the court can say well the sanctions were warranted or un warranted i think it has to go court that i do not have any authority cited in my proof i thought that was just procedure we need more facts before we can make our determination however if you look at my brief there is case law that says the room the role should s spurious but my chances here are very i think on the motion to dismiss your chances aren't all that great as far as a six more night giving you completely taken care of but you make your run better as an attorney you get my client has spent an inordinate amount of time and has incurred these not only for the repetitive feeding of opposing counsel but for the prosecution of the few and i don't ask for sanctions but i can see i've never been involved in another situation in my short career were sanctions folk at the trial court level and i believe that i'm sorry i took it more as an answer to our claim as opposed to any sort of motion and the judge said to me if you want to reach trial it as an answer so insofar as replying in memory of the law and transcripts and i have a situation for all the work i've done since this point till now and has any good it's not only one i'm not going to stop this from stand and so i become a person that just kind of moves around the house and then you run i think the transcripts that we've given you and the propositions that we have many definitions of contempt