way that it was done by the district court was cute first find that the cases were related and then to apply to departures yes my understanding is that that all of the the defendants initially serving their sentences and have been released and at least one of them has been deported as i understand it so have all of them now been deported i can't i can't answer  as i read those guidelines she's going to be able to get within about two levels of worship i wanted to go and so as a practical matter she could do pretty much the same thing you know me and you know a few levels well they could come back you use the court of them but they can't they could be a parole in of the country horrible and of the country well i mean anything is possible the cases that we cited to the court indicate that yeah there's did we are simply going on a lot of experience in a lot of cases that are not only have been tried in our district that are going to come before this court and that the the fact of the matter is that the if not have been suffering from and if you don't need to come up with some fictional idea that these are poor people from a poor country and that they somehow got suckered into taking four thousand pounds of poking out of a boat in the open ocean law is not valid at least in the context of appeals that are not on the conviction itself spencer was in a few of the parole revocation in that case and it's now quite clearly that many strains three year period supervised release if they come back again and they are arrested for doing that again or if they simply reenter illegally after being reported that's exactly i think they could be given is satisfied by general assertions or inferences in the course of their activities response will be prosecuted for violating valid criminal laws we assume the respondents will conduct their activities within the law and so wh were looking at this on a very famous corpus i would agree with you that we don't have jurisdiction because they're gone but it seems to me that whether they are still subject to punishment as part of the original  violate the law in order to be subject to the punishments releases all about it is a tool designed to deter them from engaging in further conduct but if they do then they are going to their they would have been in here yelling that they'd completed their their sentence and why are we doing that true enough we did the pork i'm at it once again they can weave they can be brought back into the united states either via actually i'm a letter and that's  theft in the grand scheme of things these were the yes these relieved people who are minimally involved i think we don't just agree with that in fact we agree they are minimally involved but that doesn't mean that their behavior within their responsibility w different it was that if they were just part of a grand scheme of things and there and their behavior was part and parcel it was necessary for the completion of the of the events now with regard to the a it so if you're going to charge people with a conspiracy to possess or possession you've got to show that they somehow can't can at least constructive possession and that would be extremely difficult and a case of that nature