MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
going to commit any crime let alone the outright and the alternative i would ask that your honour's reverses convictions ramp for a new trial the prosecutors in this case committed misconduct during closing arguments by among other things misrepresenting transportation the car to get them to and from the crime scene and also the car that transport the gun ladies and gentlemen he also told the jury what about actor well criminals have to get away without getting away there'd be no crime  potentially an accessory after the fact however there's no evidence again fact he drove away knowing i would see committed armed robbery and in fact his house you want me with that he didn't know what happened until after they were already driving away have to show actual knowledge car moving his head from side to side and as she she walked around the garages and that time she saw all this super car was parked and there was no one inside the car  jury the prosecutor actually write directly from the jury instructions what the law was in proceeding to apply that to the facts of this case now business argument is of course that she did not apply here she the prosecutor not apply the fact
what is the difference between a car parked in the driveway you know arguably the burglary right there but say there is one of these will stand alone going where you put your lawnmower and there's a window in it and you look inside the window and you see the gun but you have to get a warrant them to go into that s because my understanding of the facts are the defendant was in the house yes and i think the daughter was in the house and the car was parked and it was empty so why wouldn't there be probable cause to believe the gun is in the house with
have some strips that we're looking at but we don't have anything you know for example brandywine wasn't on the list the really that was something that we did just because of the condition of it so we have brandywine among one of our  ninety two to the hamilton hill arts center which gets them up to the amount they requested give an additional eleven hundred dollars to better neighborhoods and to take that funding from the week i think services strong feelings about avoiding funds to the schenectady basketball club in the schenectady boxing program so what i'm suggesting is line forty eight we take a thousand dollars from the boys and girls club line fifty two we take two thousand from community police line fifty five we take a thousand from the schenectady youth bureau line fifty nine we take five thousand from the y m c a and that way then we can award forty five hundred less and less this is the only way we're going to be able to do some of this and i mentioned earlier we did not want to be the sole funding source for any organization there's got to be an expectation they're going to be seeking funds in additional areas and we also want to see concrete goals i think some of the applications the goals are kind of in terms of it's either we're going to do a program or we're going to meet with people and things like that but it's not specific about where you're going to help x number of people find looking to see if there is a volunteer among the rest of you don't have thought you know right this minute my understanding is there they supposedly meet monthly but they really don't you know maybe a couple of times a year and they have that to be able to cover a week working in this program with the library the i just wanted to put it on the desk there's general support for this really would be looking at needing four people every day i didn't put the hours down but i think when i did it last year it was like eleven to wander something like that as i said it would be at the library and it would be one week and within the timeframe of july twentieth to august fourteenth she also indicated that you know since there's only seven of us that we could maybe other city employees might be interested in participating in this as well so i just wanted to get a sense is there support for trying to do this and if so i will work on this and try to come up with one week and see who
or say to call the very down there by number twenty two the job getting it in
army so we really have a sixty thousand dollars a bill so the question i know is that same question or what in the course of this most recent information necessar
because we were told days ago that you were going to do this i'm  jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction of the court why and on what basis do you claim that the structured settlement protection act applied in this case in the face of the anti assignment and the insurance companies what was well a consideration used by settlement funding or any part of all state g e whether what was the consideration for us to allow the amendment to the contract  it is i'm sorry to interrupt is it true however that mr k gets paid for the representation through the proceeds that the individual eventually in order to get the one thirty bent that you have to have an anti assignment clause right so your client in looking at any document where there's a one thirty assignment would know there's an intern simon write it and doesn't
it's yourself my nobody else oh i'd love  don't know  i have a long talk with the man i'm deeply invested in their mission rubbed off but explain to the congregation
but i can send up a rocket nose will be on in a minute i thought you might want to do it oh come on come on where i'm a pancake  week one hundred a week with to me that record you people like me i don't want to to get what i know i feel like said but it has so many girls when you go to get ahead of it if you don't take the first when you see do
for nightfall we'll take one more chance on you lullaby but if you're not back by evening we're coming after you and you know what that means thanks for telling us jake only flesh we've got to get into a doctor dollars in cash which i want thanks to my account and i insist on having it and i insist on having it now in spite of him insulting question and
the sensation and you've got me to thank for it i don't know why i should be done my job i would say you still mad about you i'm mad about you this is not a daydream for the public would never believe i planned all this all why was i ever born of this is no time for little if anything worse could happen i'd like to know what it is i'll take that check mine that about
ah last winter i had to jump out of a two story mess it what time is it  i'll take that check fiance the girl you're going to marry whether there must be some mistake
is i can see that but i'd rather be living a normal life with a real home not one that can be shifted around like a temp how can i live in a real home when i got to tell you happy about it yes of course i'm a fine husband for you now to the world come managed to wipe me out quite as completely as you expected to do it having you no no no yes i he's in love with you he always has been good that we were married to me drop me tonight deliberately take a lot of come here you can go in there now honey why didn't they tell me why didn't you told already about me i'm all right i can take up all of the best oh my darling them half my life trying to get under the of course not a lot of young to take care of yourself death because i couldn't call it no reason that he doesn't know who he married  i think if you went out to california first you might be able to convince the hell that i've been acting like a fool and i know you're high like you couldn't have said anything to make me any happier life is the most wonderful christmas present i've ever had an open top page under your trapeze act think of the audience sitting on the edges of their seats watching you fly over some of the wild animals that i came out of africa so many theories you can't mean wait a minute knockout it's great and we'll tell it to the wo
yeah yeah i'm i'm learning in new shoes like through the school system with having my daughter tested for a learning disability because she's not bad enough in school you know it's like pulling teeth and because everybody is so afraid of the kids feeling bad because they might lose right they want everything to be equal and and that's not life life is not for you know silly kids as they cannot grow up don't know how to handle the and i feel like
quarter in appropriately used the december two thousand to version of that car rather than the july many ninety one version  respect to those debts be the use of the long far is in fact reversal or subsection seen explain that there were incurred costs and therefore there are guarantees that flew from the breach the government intends to b it is clear also that the government intended to read into the far end that doesn't exist and that is that the costs incurred back to the cash financial contributions is the phrase used by the government agree to mr frederickson stands so in that situation for example let's say there was nothing and all the money that extended for research development later there would have been nothing to share the government would have five pay all property with an immaterial squire by u s government funding under this contract shall be wired soley for the purpose of the joint venture the government in taking the property and delivering it to some entity other than the joint venture breach that provision thank you
well actually he could probably get monday night and i'm just thinking about at this point a resolution just commending the folks and recognizing it and i don't know that we want to go this crowd make it the official song just yet but at least to get it
eighteen years of age or o
really you know or
section one short title
cases again the people cited those cases just for the proposition at the point that in both of those cases the ins from the prosecutors were obtained to state that an offer had been made and
the evidence could support the elements for class certification and for all to make unnecessary threshold determination that there were wage law does not require employers to get paid for time feinstein before and after the work day he granted pla them time when employees are performing no work it is now second whether there is evidence of any policy of cracking practice applicable to the class that required or permitted poor post shift work absent authorized on liability damages include those defenses with one rule no evidence beyond the undisputed lawful people policies and perhaps the location of the time clocks count more than a single class members claim the start of your shift employees who do pops in earlier were paying for this time to think could be subject to discipline fifteen minutes for working tell him if someone's going to punch you in and start working immediately and they punch him ten minutes early and the runs to the car if they come in ten minutes  schedule and the supervisors change the schedule to include overtime it basically is absurd justice reason i punched out at four fifteen was that i work until bored i got time and i only get paid for those ten minutes right or wrong is that the position that
this is invalid or valid in that case so here again yes if this
myself and prove that my lesson may be up all right that's going to get over that i have no gun i'm an arm what are you doing here and i'll tell you that i'm in trouble i'm in serious trouble i thought perhaps you would help me out a little bit and holding up stagecoaches again  then i've been doing a lot of wondering aloud two weeks i can't figure out why your own man cut off your spending money very day you broke the news to him a jew are going to marry again strikes me as being very are you sure you won't be needing it any more no ted i'll not be using it any more and it's yours for the asking i do for you i would like to have a little talk with you not here please fact is i have a confession i want to make to you a confession yet i mean that tim conway is not my son and picked up on the planes after an indian attack you might put them away but that's fair enough lot of money and you can go out and have a good time forget all about well think about the money i don't think we have much contact with him but what would we do with all the money what's the matter with bring i'm sorry to see you folks in this mess and i would like to help you in any way that i can thanks for your offer but i'm afraid the amount dad owns would be impossible for you to  you smile when your happy i surely d and you can't help it you keep out of this so i'm going to take you along to all right i'm not calling a bluff now you've got to tell me where you have the money and tell me qui do of course gentlemen it looks like my son is guilty all right every indication points that way i would drop the charges against him if i could get my money back as well trying to your own money yes can get to the sherry that's the man we're looking for how did you do it we met and i fired i cornered him on top of that cliff we battled all over the place pretty soon he slip
these the presumption
but it just shows were just furthers the the
to the same issues that led to the determination jack and here burke here that registration is a separate back for which the board of a trademark office is given authority and that regardless of what type of earlier law well that's that's that's a hypothetical issue before the court in the district court judge it was infringement likelihood of confusion and really all th
patients and inconsistent with the understanding skilled artist in both of the decisions the board construe checks to include a smooth surface which is contrary to the specification in the method i mean everything has a texture doesn't it i mean it can be very i mean a piece of glass has a texture or b it's very smooth whereas a piece of sandpaper has a different texture it's rough present some kind of a texture in other words some kind of a non smooth surface as yes you are as construed but as the claims were considered by the this reading that reading texture as as th that's certainly presents what i guess anyone would think of as textured surface the one of nine sixty nine sixty four yes your yes that's correct that's an if that's that's the outside of the hearing but the reason the reason for the appeal is to first to ask first for proper claim construction and then applying the or not to look at the or say well we could co that term throughout the specification what you have to say about the claim construction well the board did exactly what mr miller suggests that they did not do that is they did construe claims with guard of the application in its entirety looking into the application found a place dictionary definition find the word in part for purposes of process claim which is simply imparting a texture to a hearing instrument show that term unlike structure is no were defined in the specification so the word properly looks to a dictionary to define better term and found definitions said to give or to grammar or give rise to a contact association or influence check definition system with the phillips case against the specification found that definition was consistent with all the usages in the specification and then look to the prior say by the examiner and found that first were certainly applies because that would be a reference imparted texture by means of the very laser centric reference that i claim discuss the specification of the applicant and then second look to those two other references to those two and found that although the text sure there may have been applied to different part of the construing term but at the end we need some reference to decide what the scope of that term is we can't simply look at every place they used it usually in discussing it preferred a body count and say now we know what  no suggestion that in limited to the particular path it's disclosed by the apple says this texture can be imparted in any number of ways not even specified so i think go under those circumstances it's appropriate to look at the general case saves me you're a yes you are definition of imparting is modifying the surface of the hearing instrument so yes or how does it make much difference to the dictionary definition because we're not adding anything there's no there's no teaching in th procedure first properly construe the claims so we understand where the boundaries and then as need be we would amend the claims to amend the claims choir to get the construction we want the risk
university have come in and said because she got paid too much and we are part of the state university retirement system that is our wellies can benefit from it even should have typically would were involved in you to show a course i would use the proceedings the people who are before the proceeding to give notice to the other parties or the other people who could be parties she started getting workman's compensation benefits in december of two thousand and two ok and then after that she would have received a letter from servers saying we're going to give you disability benefits this is in november of two thousand and three you were going to make them retroactive to august of two thousand and three and accompanying that was the notice that you know these benefits which don't have anything to do with retirement yet retired will be reduced by an amount equivalent to workers compensation she's getting workman's comp before she gets anything from the state university retirement system the state university retirement system tells her by six months later when she starts getting those benefits they write their fingers and say you know this is going to be this could be better change your point about him showing up here it's later years later twenty show that she was notified she was told at a time when she could not believe that she was getting retirement because she hadn't yet put into retirement papers that she was gaining workman's compensation benefits and then began receiving service benefits and in fact when she knew or should have known that they told you you're not so i don't see how mr suit now argue that miss johnson thought she was applying for retirement benefits she was clearly applying for disability benefit service those benefits were granted as justice trigger points out that just neck this well he separate entities but there is a practical connection so why doesn't the university say because the university has to know if she's received following the point that mr johnson reached me excellent medical improvement according to the work stops so we are talking about permanent benefits at that point going on and it when the mission for seventy five weeks which
rolls at that time so that by the next closure by january one twenty eleven he would have already been on the books so to speak but it says this test with it and that's what i'm later found that he had made a mistake another was a mobile home because of how those manufactured homes are built to look just like a stick built house he could have corrected those mistakes it doesn't matter how you thought it was going to be assessed as real estate because of having them assessed mobile home produced or whatever before that but you're saying that if he had know that it was in that it was never attacked in two thousand pounds so i guess it seems to me that part of your argument is kind of helping it when you're saying that if he had known then perhaps the assessors know modify and change the assessment or he didn't and i believe what we're suggesting is that he didn't have that right difference in cost here are not sure exactly what the difference with that then there's several hundred dollars i mean are we talking about a substantial i don't think it would have been a substantial remainder of the year after he turns in his assessment which is the issue i think that was before the board of the department of revenue illustration where that that's what they talked about th itself seems to indicate that if they could in that thirty days even if they had been taxed previously they had an extra chance to get the privilege to actually get together in the early february to really go well that's when using effective date was january so they have thirty days of get in the job i guess i'm with you until the language up to the period so you have an extra thirty days which we know there's a criminal penalty associated with the file so isn't it just as likely that this thirty days is a saving grace for the avoidance of criminal penalty that i don't see i don't see the jump that you're like the standard goes on to say you can hear not a mobile all you get all these things in here is what you have to do but it clearly says toward the end of that paragraph failure to record shall not prevent the home from being tax as real property so i don't understand the argument you're making that they had this extra thirty days to bring it down that's my answer and in any event in a way it's not even relevant to the german situation  five hundred dollars let's say that their tax bill for twenty eleven because they were before the closure of the books was five hundred dollars and now because of the way the county does their books i we close the books the end of june and merely because the closure of the books we can't assess you we can't attach it so now you can't give in to this problem with the donor but we
for a disability pension was seven hundred ninety one ninety three but in february twenty one i've been the amount that they were held as a set off was sixteen eighty seven ninety six you know why those two numbers are different maybe yes maybe it's when you figure out the want sixty eight and half weeks from the starting date comes to make twenty ten think what they're looking  february two thousand and seven through february two thousand and five that yes that was that incorrect yes but because look at the stats and the benefits award for working at getting that award so it's not her fault in that sense that she had to wait five years to get paid finally during which time she received other benefits the statute specifically that if you if you're getting disability for an injury or whatever happens to you and you later receive an award for worker's comp for that same injury offsetting against a return it's all right i think just the statements hit the nail on the head in this case the argument that if the plaintiff mates i usually leads to an absurd result it would have the plaintiff receiving a double recovery of service benefits and worker's comp compensation benefits for the same injuries during the same period of time the plaintiff does not dispute the fact that she received serious disability benefits and worker's comp disability benefits for the duction shall be me the quinta any benefits that can be paid to any employee under any state or federal workers compensation or occupational diseases yes for any period of time for which disability circumstances are relevant to our resolution but no was i'm curious what your assessment was with regard to the situation to subscribe that well your honor i don't know the reasons why it that it's going to be paid six months later apparently that's been going on for many many years and i've served can't do anything about that but but but again the real question is disabled she applies for disability and she starts to collect it simultaneously she's trying to go through the process supporters she gets enough years during that process where she could actually retire and she hasn't gotten her can i ask you one more time because i'm not sure i'm clear on this in the claims panel decision where they say service disability benefits and worker's comp benefits overlapped for the same period of time february twenty fourth two thousand and seven through he you know i know that the phrase close enough for government work ought to really be a joke it all kept the standard operating procedure and i'm wondering what you know what's going to happen with this operation and  you know people want to be able to rely upon what they hear what they get from service it's supposed to be professional organization here and i guess we're getting a little bit pincer to the next case but we have the same thing going so going back to that