the rate of pay that he was he was that before she said a rate of from nine to eleven dollars an hour however after working also with this flame there was no there were no successful  his hand locked up several times and he was afraid and he was rushing that's if you look at he's fifty one of the actual testimony from the arbitration hearing and also difficulties and you know he was says he was afraid and he was he was pressured i think that comes you know the fact that ok he didn't finish in such a quick time period if you look i think he testified that at one point  unemployable his injury was limited to his wife and was a laceration injury to thumb that required repair of a tendon injury or other body parts were injured at the time of the accident and there's no evidence that he had any limitations to any other of his body parts there's no medical evidence stating he's currently told the disabled in this case medical experts dr tung the treating physician dr who responded to examining physician both agreed that he performance criteria on the functional past vibration test and the therapist who performed the task noted that the profile was consistent with symptom magnification he refused to perform some of the activities of the t exam he felt that he could work at a higher level than like to be based on the results of the functional pacify way ssion and also based on his clinical examination when he examined the petitioner he noted that he had dirt under his fingernails and also had a lack of atrophy in his left hand job efforts are as efforts at finding work were inconsistent and he failed on occasion to contact the minimum number of employers per the placement plan and also he was job search record revealed that he was trying to find employment that was beyond his vocational abilities in addition they had a job interview mind up for a security position and that had to be canceled because of the a he did feel throughout the course of his vocational attempts with mr lee that he was employed by june blaine the second vocational expert that was hired by the respondent in this case tried to retrain she thought that was the mode to take rather than try and find more of these other jobs she testified that the work as a pop qualified elevator specter would be within his restrictions i she's a vocational expert so i would i assert that she would have a greater knowledge than the petitioner as to what the job powerful nations would be for that position she thought that was a good idea to use his prior experience in the elevator industry and put him in that position she set up the classes for him he attended the classes the instructor commented and it's in the record that he was constantly out of the room on his cell phone during the classes  the instructor was worried that he was not focusing on the task at hand and what was what was being pop to him he also didn't not only did not fully participate in the training but he also well i don't know that there's pacific notation that exactly to that effect but i don't think the focus lives for it would've tried to put him in that position if there was not a reasonably stable job market she thought that he would have been misplayed then after he failed the test she went further and tried to take a different tack try to get him additional computer skills that would make him more marketable as an employee in the job market and  he initially completed the first part of course but then didn't complete the second private part of the course and his reason for not completing the second part of course was because he didn't want to drive ten minutes farther to complete the course because it was ten minutes farther away from where he live he never after that happened they see spoke ational expert or they see spoke asian activities because of his lack of cooperation there had been a pattern throughout the case of his lack of cooperation and they felt that it was just going to continue and though there was no benefit to can you continue to try and they did continue to provide maintenance benefits while you did his job search on its own but they didn't feel that any further benefit was going to be had by continuing to try to retrain w the information that she was provided she made a decision that it was not going to be p well i think that the testimony was put on that he could find work it was obviously last and what he was making i think they have been complying with the wage differential ward i would say they weren't pleased like well think that i'm not going to agree or disagree with your act your honor i think they did have decided that at that point it was a lost cause there's also know