due process he this barred him after he was admitted in violation of the local rules he disbarred him claiming that because he had a prior felony conviction he was rescinded an order which he had originally admitted him to practice and a petition under the local rules where mr curtin provided his certificate of good standing from the eastern district in the state of new york and explained in his petition under local rule eighty three point one the circumstances of the prior felony conviction which judge skull and presided over in two thousand and ten but hearing what difference would it have made but if you had a hearing he would have explained the circumstances of the prior felony conviction which is the subject matter of the coroner notice petition saying that their conviction should be vacated to achieve justice because that conviction should have never have it should have what was happening because of their conviction he had continued to know because he pled it was a plea bargain and when he pled the reason why he played that was because he wanted to continue to be in the business of insurance or at least get his license to practice law so he could represent the church company in litigation which he did and what happened was the department of financial services in new york state decided that by being the lawyer for the insurance company he was engaging in the business of insurance the problem goes back to that hearing back then when he was temperate when he was suspended from the practice of law a so if you're convicted of ten thousand three hundred and thirty one b you're in a state of limbo you're not able to get a waiver so ok he could live with that he served his sentence he had a five year probationary sentence paid a fine of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars and he came in gauging the business of insurance but he got his wall license back so he was able to practice law the regular state regulatory agency said well you can't represent the sky and he wanted so he then applies to get admitted into the northern district again and he's admitted while he's admitted then there's a motion brought to disqualify him from representing the risk insurance company in the without a hearing or an opportunity to be heard that he had violated a federal criminal statute and he punished him that's one of the core lobos comes in he's being punished again in violation of double jeopardy because multiple punishments for the same offense that he had already been punished for what he when he pled guilty to that one thousand and thirty three violation as a result of their he's then told well you  know you're violating the criminal statute there's no u s attorney bringing any charges there's no indictment there's no trial there's no jury decision it's a judge deciding you violated a federal crim ruling him because of the continuing disability where you can't practice law he still being punished for the same crime he already served his sentence and which i submit is double jeopardy because it's multiple punishments for the same of fense and then a week later after the after judge people's decides he violated a federal criminal statute which by the way they should have sought the civil penalty under one th statute well if you file it a criminal state you have your tourney general have the u s attorney bring an indictment and let's have a trial and the issue there was never any trial or any fine in effect as to whether or not he was engaged in the business of insurance and that's fundamentally unfair  fundamentally unfair for them to for judge scullin to then come back a week later and sue a spontaneous say well we made a mistake we should never admitted you in the st place because you have a prior felony conviction so we're going to strike you from the membership of the