things about this case that are right and we can see there's things about it that are wrong and so i'm sorry i thought i heard somebody trying to ask me a question there's not everybody that works at the prison systems in eagle scout who have sworn an oath to duty in loyalty and honor and some level we want punk and ollie's were in our prisons because they're more equipped to get the job done and in this case that's exactly what happened with the actions of m ling and laurean there are use of miss kate who is a law abiding taxpaying citizen is different and it should be she should be treated different and how correctional officers are allowed to  and i want it so if that answers your question so yeah why didn't exactly leave it in those terms it was kind of a narrower focus i wanted just to make sure that you are in fact your contention is cherrypicking because the other parts of the conversation were i'm going to do something about this this isn't right and that's what kind of differentiates ms kates from all the other people that this happens to and i'm going to share the court or was that not sufficient to run this strip search now we're getting into this contract eerie miss chait's applied for her mission to enter the prison to visit the prison because that's an application much like applying for a driver's license in doing so she surrendered somehow her amendment rights inside it but in exchange under contract theory she's entitled to compel the government  original we originally and the district court relied not evilly to us at least reasonable suspicion her but the point is it's an undisputed fact that warrant was not executed enough the fact that and when you have it in his back right and so the whole everybody knows that prisoners don't have a right yes to fish does your th amendment claim then depend on the nevada regulations that are if nevada's regulations 're free of course to decline and then you can just leave and and as i understand your pov the argument here is that she was never given the option of leaving they just essentially put hands on her or to another room and strip search mean it doesn't say about you know on or in or anything like that yes the warrant is that i will concede or is very general but again i think that you know when you read it in the context of the affidavit in the back and also  did it certainly seems like you know belt and suspenders if you got if you got a warrant sitting in your back pocket i mean that just things like like easy insurance now the one thing that occurs to me is if you don't have to use the warrant it doesn't it doesn't have to  alert her to the possibility that somebody somebody has contacted them she's not going to be able to figure out who the about the c i s but you know she makes she may go and figure out that somebody has been talking to the police and tipped them off about her and that's to the police then it but if they don't so just lecture you understand the chain of authority and how it all works and in this situation if senior officials say nothing about an incident like this then the lower a very interesting lead that there is no case on this bizarre in many cases out there not very many people that go to the prison visit family members have access to just the teenage cases a little different she's a taxpaying it citizen this happened to her she's outraged and that's how she ended up in our lab and so that's why there is no law but there needs to be because otherwise this is going to continue it has it has a