what is the use of discretion use of discretion you see fit only to take into proper consideration the facts and the wall relating to the particular time that it's argued that in addition to what might be considered reasonable and he said he spoke with each one of them he reviewed the medical records or be reviewed what they did provided information did so with your clients and that was and how did you get that information home through the testimony and through the discovery of the initial internet site statements had been contained in certain motions which prior three representing mr gambari had in his possession so to say well we didn't know anything isn't true they had knowledge of we had or could have easily determined that we will for three years down the road so but then if you go to the statement of mr zolli did any these people all these people say that he had repressed memory they alleged it which constitutes in my opinion that they have investigated this and people have said just how can it be true if in fact these other individuals are saying i outside the normal schedule limitations the only exception to there is where you can refresh my memory how convenient ok then how convenient he's is th saying that you have to the recollection of children and that is that the memory maybe falls but the relation of that memory may not be a lie it may not be false as far as the relate or is concerned insofar as the relate or it is concerned that's what they remember and believe that this happened but that doesn't necessarily mean it did and so when you start talking about veracity who is arrested you talking about the people who claim that known a long time or i don't know about the ones that were dismissed earlier but when you continue the litigation and you in your asserting that there is repressed memory with respect to these plaintiffs and then they come in the but if if you like mr sort of mayor has said that three of the plaintiffs now say i never said i have repressed memory would that be free just no and but she also testified that she was confused about what that meant she reached out to the attorneys to find out what what ignace they explained to her what this meant and after being bitten in a sling to her she was satisfied that the yes i was abducted by aliens sad enough that but i believe it because i mean i believe it happened and i convince my attorney that i believe it happened is that enough and what's the difference between that and what happened here inconsistent with the allegations that you were pressed to memories or that you do not appreciate the relationship between they were in bed the abuse causing injuries but the attorney did more than just rely upon its client fellow respect just there are any issues that maybe some of the plaintiffs or one of the plaintiffs sought treatment after the complaint was filed they came into question i case has been dismissed from terribly dismissed did it come as a result of the failure to produce all the medical records or the problem with the social media when this is the heart of the issue is what was disclosed between attorney and client that was a big part of the heart of the issue was was it recently objectively a break but how do you know that how do you would value weight that if you don't know what a couple of i was serious questions before it's what what the client says is that reasonably objective or objective to be reasonable but if you if you can't tell me what it was they sat how do we ever judge that fairly to both sides i know that's a loaded question and if any of you know what to the client is one of the oldest most protected privileges right period but what about it and it's to judge whether you're the attorney made these with a reasonable basis or not how do i know that i had only evaluate that if i don't know what your client told you because you know that you know the information else the client telling that's that's what may or may not color whether or not your allegation was objectively reason but there's nothing yet and again be the alleged discovery and then if there had been a trial and there was to be a viable defense that it was  i become involved in a fire to go back and review everything that has been done with respect to view towards the rules of professional responsibility i don't know yet but i do understand th