petition was june rd two thousand and nineteen and order says that it's for reasons stated on the record we actually don't have those as part of our record here but the notice of appeal was filed june t many aspects or at least several aspects of this proceeding and subsequent appeal that are so dysfunctional for want of a better term  there were other reasons that weren't discussed previously as to why he is making the ruling that he made and that would suggest that in order to appeal that decision he would you have to establish that of the reasons that he gave for doing so that are in addition an essentially in a time line going forward outside date because there was some happiness in the previous hearing that mr burke contributed to some expenses for the emancipation child and so considering that he thought it was fair but he had also in that it continues is rickly matter of the bridge description based on the stand as the links the other issues that have come up in this case yes i thought i knew i wasn't available that i had another documents you have to present the problem is this it been set for eight weeks almost and by the time it didn't go to the hearing at least you weren't there you would receive this door just two weeks before makes sense that maybe you would attach there to show why he waited instead of bringing this motion right after you said it you didn't know you had a hearing i honestly don't know if i attach or not and it may have been you need to speak up  in the business and see he was seventeen and he's continued his own business all the way up until this day he has never had unemployment or any lapse of work drive no luck so i don't understand what this again this is stating or what is fred well then the more particular question is once you turn around her and he graduated from high school st and then he turned eighteen so eighteen he then changed it because of the new law the shared income law because if he did if he did it the other way or he had changed it modified it would actually hurt him because he was making more a change of it just one child he took off but that should have been done previously but he didn't do it because it would have affected him that makes any sense and it's hard to explain the numbers when did you finally get all the one more time we please don't you know what court today we can get continue it and i was like are you sure and he said yes it's fine so i said ok this is it exciting want to keep continuing continuing with this you know it's been five months and i get in child support they're giving me a one thousand i want to see his checking account records for his business because you don't know what someone's writing off in their business or how much they're making on their greed i did ask to speak to the traits i didn't know what my you know law was with being able to  statute to reduce right and that's why i was in service have been done in the past and i did see a lawyer i saw on a man in new york for all i could not afford a lawyer he told me that the case was pretty much how i thought it we came in to see the seven and nothing and then in september th the judge said to blind you have to have these documents it sits right on there says you must bring me give her your documents with that with i think four weeks or something before the court date so i never received those documents actually until december something after our original court date of november trial i never even received those documents up at that point so i wouldn't have been able to even at that trial he would have been able to say what he had to or you know i'm saying where i could have them in the check done so if i could just say yes so why shouldn't child support have been set at eight hundred and emancipated a number of years prior to that right you're right about that but he had taken all the way to me to show me his income that was the problem i need it was income so yours be prior to that if he was making  hundred thousand he should've been paying twenty percent on that one hundred thousand so up until two thousand and seventeen that's when it he wanted to get changed that's what he's saying you know say this we're trying to make it soon is that rule came out that's forth paying for car insurances i would bring the food to her door and he didn't have a license so for me to drive back and forth and be a part of all that it was only one hundred and fifty dollars more a month comparable to the twenty percent he was saying if he stated that my daughter was over eighteen he never had anything to say about that part of it i think that if he was worried about it then he would have said to the court you know i need to get a romance here how do i do this it wasn't till two thousand and seventeen he was in for it in early september for riches and then he actually found a lawyer in there and that's why in two thousand and eighteen he came into to court because he had told me in december he had a court you know i was he was taking me to court to change it all because it was shared in  so then my daughter was at school and i took out all the loans i signed for them because he wouldn't file the faster form so those loans are all in my name and that's another problem because now i'm stuck with the loans which is she graduated couldn't get an apartment because a credit was bad so they took out a loan of seven thousand dollars dollars to fix her credit because when she was in school she made some mistakes in them so she couldn't get an apartment couldn't since she didn't get money for the dorm so she dragged every back and forth to school two hours later two hours back and so at one point i was paying for hotels for her that was figured in the seven thousand dollars i took out because we couldn't have her going every day that go forth to school it was too hard for her to i did not ask for those expenses for that i asked for for part of her money for college which i was denied and i was also asked for my son just the younger day that we saw her for some of his stuff that was like school fees and judo they paid for for two years and he denied that but she did have medical they voted as he was supposed to train medical insurance on both of them and he was over of this year it ended he stopped he didn't tell me and so i asked him about taking my son to the doctor sort of question and he said no and i was like why and then don't came out that that was the problem here t insurance so now i'm working with the state how to get insurance  no no letter that said she was at the secretary of state's office for the hearing that's kind of you know you're supposed to prove to the lawyer where you were on wife was so important that there was not even that in in that affidavit that she