do want to make one point that i don't think comes across really well in the breeze just by the fact that these research summaries and when i'm up here and we're talking about this and we're always summarizing these these   on page twelve i mention the fans narrative testimony that that the judge a lot of times due that's s r p three nine nine three four hundred thirty seven and then another third one and you also notice these how private counsel exist on exist the account harbor the family was not working on releasing funds from trust counsel apparently believes are a trust existed there's some strange substantiation of some of aspects of these claims and there anything that was this sure and the obvious one would be would be the dated also all well what happens is is there's a lot of things that are that don't really that are new to  tries and uses of fancy things that i don't really see angie and he wants them to use or he wants to use them see to do and that's i think a big part of the problem here one of you for example the taped telephone one he also i know i pointed this out review for for every every witness who had anything to do with the house transaction he showed that witness that clause in the contract term in a new construction every witness said it was but he continued to try to get somebody to admit or this say that that he was actually had to deal with sixty three thousand dollars of a reason i actually didn't talk about too much in the recent withers case law that says that there is at least a federal case with respect to the the in the universe and edwards issue that's that's where the federal work actually refuses to consider yes and even just ask the point where the judge was making the restoration fine you had a one thousand two hundred pages of of evidence of you know first hand evidence of how mr byrd was going to act in you know i wouldn't give you a peach right now but i believe that this court in other words talks about specifically about it not being just to have a hopeless the founding hopeless mentally ill then because of the content on those pages because i don't think that in the defense that he put up was a giant delusion in that the evidence that he tried to bring out was didn't prove what he wanted to  mr byrd is a free man right now he's been discharged last week and he is even free from his and that's our so what would be the actual west with sending him back for a new fitness so that's another interesting aspect again i'm not sure whether that what that speaks to here but i thought it was one of those points the specific arguments about the judge's findings y have two well several experts at restoration hearing one of which is dr serino who initially said oh he's fed restored to us and then they come back to the hearing and aft back in and talk to him again it was just based on the snap decision based on what you're saying in that in people versus hands you feel as being more put into it was a case involving where there were several decide whether or not he is fair and judge erickson actually us on the pages it was twelve pages in his decision so he must be delusional because he goes on for a month did not have any that he had a personality disorder and may have some reasons based on that but again it wasn't a severe mental illness that edwards calls them at risk sets you have to have that  burt which of course never and never will was take it so there is there is testimony from two doctors that he was delusional one and three doctors that you had a personality and under and that's right i did talk about since then the basic idea is that they should be able to not and to prevent the keys from devolving into some kind of stammer spectacle and i think this case really that's what happens  is it and the judge had a great deal warning that this was going to happen is it because as i said you know you have the nine months of restoration here and this defendant did he did he did it to the restoration here and he does have you know he would just talk and talk and talk and talk to him about all sorts of things and it just wouldn't make sense and it wouldn't is avon's didn't prove that he wanted to prove