might sell for less if they were sold separately i serve that was just pretax and the bank really had no interest in maximizing the sales price they are arguing that there is nothing wrong with selling track corn for two percent of their market value so i don't think they have much credibility first they did that they were able to obtain the winning bid with a bit of only hundred fifty thousand dollars then they they took a break then they had visited salem trucks and they were the only better of eight million eight hundred fifty thousand dollars then they had a combined asked for judgment be accurate in your finds favor a partial summary judgment as to count four is your evidence so strong that i don't titles to the partial summary judgment on count four yes gets back to my original question to which is to me there is nothing in the record that shows how gerald ever took title at this point in time i'm not saying that for also under rule three sixty six eight five oh horribly exercised your station two completely determining case order to determine a case as completely as possible i'm asking you or of the claim the plaintiff alleged interest subject to the mortgage the simple on july eleventh two thousand and twelve attorney who represented the answer and admitted that the more of these on the fee simple interest the power on june twenty fourth two thousand and thirteen on the eve of feet hearing for a summary judgment motion every if you're foreclosing on the whole property you allege fees simple that's what it means if it's it's you know in the statute in prison sees they give you some hints as to what to put it says here in suit search for their fee simple estate for years undivided interest etc but it could be a leasehold interest in a number of things the statute goes on to say a should have said deny that allegation and affirmatively set forth no it was the more it was only by francis wrote there is only on her undivided one half interest but instead he admitted three times i need to move on the other can't commit fraud at an auction that was not only legally advertise once week for three weeks in the coogan county newspaper but it was advertised in about six more newspapers throughout the state farm had some green pins and one was split to buy the product there was no way to get the brain in and out of those bits if you didn't own one if you didn't on track seven there was no way scale there were no  appraiser that he didn't use the end approach doing him preys on commercial properties in some approaches by far the most reliable approach why didn't he use it why didn't he have the income information available false that is that it's just and the receiver's report was filed two weeks before the hearing on confirmation of the sale and it showed the monthly trip cost for they all they had all the information necessary to  did the sales comparison approach and the other the other way of phrasing the ending approach he had all the income information walking around on the property is not going to change the monthly rent that he has a monthly rental on the receivers times before where the boundary line splits property it's all when you know bigger operation it should be sold offered separately and then offer to combine whichever brings the best price is how we do it he then went on to say as shown in the case there was over five million dollars owed on the first three mortgages summary judgment by and sent these properties without track one two point one five million leaving  a two point whatever deficiency and this track tracked one brought one hundred fifty thousand so it comes to point three million their knowledge more just five million  is nowhere at all direct none of that was even talked about so no that support track one consists of the seventy eight hours and it brings on an individual better basis with