in two thousand and one that's  false evidence and in particular false evidence against her in two thousand and one this court on bond said that in order to demonstrate that a government actor has subjected to defend chappell literally every police report and much of the records from the criminal cases produced in the witch hunt investigation she also gave him the legal standard that was set forth by this court in gener he also said that we didn't and you don't really get very high he has absolutely correct that it is not a negligence standard and we know that that is what the supreme court has said at the baseline section night and eighty three don't agree with that formulation by the devereaux court i think it is not even the defendant's argues that the death row standard is wrong if you want to say i do simply want to say that they say that the judge followed devereaux and it's absolutely clear from those portions of the record that we quote here that judge wally even reminded that this circuit had the final say on a five hundred dollar an hour report of experts and say you should have known you knew or you should have known that you are violating the constitution therefore we get to it yuri and that's the standard the court judge  requirements of section one thousand nine hundred three just where they went on to say so that the circuit knows i don't think that a jury could find liability because mr president do the things that the plaintiffs suggest a reasonable officer would have done which is was insufficient evidence that that he knew there's no way to detect a prison do that or that he was lying or fabricating evidence about the worst dream because to this day he believed she sexually abused children when she confessed for that crime and then the question is if you continue that investigation this or anything wrong with continuing the investigation after you've had this confessional with her and you had really correctly said no there's nothing wrong with continuing the investigation in fact you have an obligation to to know that they violated the constitution and again the claims presented no evidence none whatsoever to the trial court that any of the interview techniques violated the standard and so based on that the judge granted detector pres also mentioned if they're seeking reversal of the mill decision that was granted by the court i've brief that extensively on this really i just have a few minutes left but i just want to touch on that the court also found that chief as we had no supervisory liability found it that he didn't possess the requisite knowledge that the supervisor needs to know so in other words if you don't directly participate in a constitutional violation do you know that  your subordinate is violating the constitution or correctly said that there was no knowledge of the part you naturally and then the court said that he certainly wasn't deliberately indifferent to the any of the issues raised by the plaintiff he was properly trained he was properly supervised and there wasn't any deliberate indifference to any of what's constitutional violations nor was there any personal knowledge that there was any constant violations so cheap this court said the plaintiffs had not presented enough evidence so in order to show what a reasonable police officer should have known green went out and talked to a reasonable police procedures expert a him what should a reasonable officer have known in one thousand nine hundred four in conducting these investigations it's entirely proper evidence it complies with the standards set forth by this court in devereaux and it was before the court well in advance of december two thousand and three when the court reconsidered its ruling denying detective pereira's section qualified immunity on that basis th whaley did materially differ with the controlling circuit precedent on this issue and should not have dismissed green's essential claim which was that detect in all of his actions in regard to her proceeded on the basis of false evidence and that a reasonable officer should have known that he was doing so