MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
makes it to police three involuntary and then knowing your without also putting the trial judge in a position of giving legal advice well so you didn't know that fourteen ten is a conviction which means blah blah blah blah blah  of the trial is never going to be in a position to know what the conversations between the defense counsel and the federal which is the way it's supposed to be and i don't know if you were listening carefully because i gave you a hypothetical that suggested that the defendant was actually answering the question which he has to allege or do it in this case which is in my hypothetical he was say no even if i was given wrong information i would still not want to go to have asked for a trial as always if i had medical puts the person in the position of being able to lie and say yes i would seek a trial or is a wrecker that will for whatever reason up at least give a judge some prior some knowledge of the federal statute to suggest that sorry you lose we're not going to recognize the fact that it's been it's fun to sure that you were placed on supervision especially relative to domestic violence and t yes yes but you know we have a situation here where this he was picked up for very with a suspended license they take them to the police station they take off the stacking cap and cocaine falls out of this could stay you're going to go for sure you're going to beat your into court i mean it's a very difficult situation for the defense counsel again the same thing for for  what do you think the attorney in bed by what he said did he need to say something that was clear concise and actually form or do you think he was o this quiet it doesn't make sense because saying what he said when we all know now that it was completely over the wall suggests the country well i don't think it was utterly wrong i
services to a patient and that patient has a right to a good support feature the doctor doesn't have an independent right to go after the twenty's or that's what makes it will mean he has a right to recover that money potentially but it's never been dependant we knew we were insurance company had a ten thousand dollars medical payment we knew then before the two of us ever reached the settlement negotiations went on for about seven day weeks with letters and calls back and forth almost and in every excuse me and every other day basis a lot of time spent in a supplement go shisha i spent a lot of time talking to my client about what would make him haul and we finally came to the point of ordering back and forth that thirty thousand were making my client home and we then included based upon the case law is up here we knew we had to take care of this or would have come out of this thirty thousand dollars we saluted the ten thousand dollars for your insurance company we did call the insurance company and ask them here you get a letter from farmers telling them it was continued because of the underlying suit and copy of their motion farm or something and i believe mr we know will address that during his portion of the argument and was also part of the record the letter was not in the regular insurance company's going to be reduced by a third in the court hell no we're not going to reduce it by a third because you restricted their purchase patient the file they tend to represent their own they told you they want to represent your own interest you didn't want to do that we're not going to  cases it's an issue of whether we're going to have to include that and i'm going to have to pull out of my pocket as an attorney to my client to get the pay insurance provision that i think to include because i think came into it's a much bigger does it only mean that book we're going to take your ten thousand and put it into this fund and our this fund you'll receive some money but not necessarily the ten thousand and it's it's more than the letter what you said assured when they knew this lawsuit was filed which they did even though he claimed he did because the records clear they received letters from farmers in letters from her company or tradition advising them that a that your insurance company was pursuing its home claim independent claim for ten thousand dollars they couldn't because you have an opportunity to claim they didn't move to dismiss it they  again it's common sense to protect the money they don't want to spend three thousand thirty three thousand three hundred dollars on attorney's fees so they go to the company over a treasure and if if if we were to take the logic that a party we were really responsive to emotion and we immediately stepped up and told the judge in the division in the in the parties we're not suggesting yourself to the jurisdiction of the score you don't have a right to drag is in here and try to educate this claim
see today there have been generations that don't know anything about the nazi work cancer why the slogan never again exists well you have got to see this and then there's these there are these holocaust deniers people who deny that this kind of stuff ever happened so this is documentary film from the very moment the united states walked in and  evidence of the almost unprecedented crimes perpetrated by the nazis or the book involved concentration camp the story and written form is contained in the official report of the prisoner of war and displaced persons division of the united states group control council which has been forwarded from supreme allied headquarters to the war department in washington it states that one thousand boys under fourteen years of age are included among the twenty thousand still alive at the camp but the survivors are males only and at the recent death rate was about two the surviving inmates as representing every european nationality it says the camp was founded when the nazi party first came into power in one nine hundred thirty three and has been in continuous operation ever since although its largest populations date from the beginning of the present and the official report the book involved camp is termed an extermination factory i means of extermination starvation complicated by hard work abuse beatings and tortures incredibly crowded sleeping conditions and sicknesses of all types sections with prisoners as guinea pigs medical scientist came from berlin periodically to reinforce the experimental step in particular new toxins and it toxins were tried out on prisoners entered the experimental buildings every and heated by cope were made by a concern which customarily manufactures banking opens the firm's name is clearly inscribed twelve hundred civilians walk from the neighboring city of weimar to begin a force tour of the camp there are many smiling faces and according to observers at first the germans act as though this were something being staged for their benefit  one of the first things that the german civilians see as they reached the interior of the camp is the parchment displayed on the table for all to gaze upon is a lampshade made of human skin made at the request of an s s officer is why large pieces of skin have been used for painting pictures many of an obscene nature the tour continues with a forced inspection of the camps living quarters where the stench filth and measure a defied description they see the result of lack of care and a bad case of trench foot thirty thousand were present when the others died after the liberation liberated prisoners could not control their emotions despite german attempts to cover up we've found be than the open field german woman guards were ordered to bury the dead
responsibilities at that time as it is the primary person responsible for that and i don't think that they're going to stay tune complaint alleges that if you go to the states allegation against one years from here to our fourteen years having gay shit in a series of environmental practices that don't mean current standards in addition in this case is like a couple of the cases that we really rely on which would be the there's no analysis consideration or anything right to the side really has this potential legal right billy would have been put into those facts then i believe we submit that the state is asking for a legal expansion defenses raised which is the subject of your question and we're not challenging the course consideration of those but she completely did not cover the potential legal legal liability issue and it did to tell the circumstances analysis we don't think that it's appropriate to sell something the result of such an important issue was so much money on the line without going through the further back it which is the subject of our of our appeal and  defenses of course that a person raised this is not right johnson i think everybody's probably familiar with johnson's facts but one of the things that happen jensen is this so the case extremely early in the face of a very strong community defense that thought it was going to be the not saying that judge ballard did not consider the defenses but will we are saying is that under johnson the totality of the circumstances requires a consideration of all of the factors in this analysis on page for  pollution and then they said we have a few releases which we don't think are material to the hundred three million and so they are probably really viable and there have been a legal determination of the facts that show that the judge unreasonable or where the no reasonable person would take could be adopted by the truck or so that's the standard that for us week in order to get a reversal of the trial court's decision and of course the jo all the information presented by printk or with well known to the core to the parties settling in not settling parties prior to the hearing and so all of that was taken into consideration so for counsel to suggest that the court did not consider all johnson textile motion to dismiss in them moving to dismiss the crew are ultimately in response to that motion rules several very important things one was that because a picture is no longer the owner of the premises injunctive relief was not available to the state that was one of the responsible for contamination of the site he expressed we stated in his world that he was not really making any comment about the potential responsibility for light bill you others who also contributed to the  counsel for both of the parties first with regard to the idea that the state live in money to clean the the refinery as a reason to rushing to sell known pennies on the dollar is not supported by the record because the
down i saw some discussion about whether or not your clients improve the property after the home burned down you know did they make such improvements like electricity water well  yes i think that's exactly right so in that kind of the case all the other protests would have to come in and prove that they didn't permit different reasons why this was so remarkably sure the convincing evidence necessary to prove
the hi i'm david the bruce this is the creative good where we celebrate everything and the creative commons today we began our series on the woman's march that happened back in january twenty first two thousand and seventeen this march was unlike any that the world has ever seen and each of the ten episodes  under thirty minutes each we're going to take a different aspect of the woman's march and one for example you're going to hear the music you've got to have music to have a march by right and another one you can hear this speeches from major people in another one you're going to hear people on the street interview and still another we're going to paris france and see what happened there and another we're going to canada and see what happened in a couple big cities there how about germany how about france paris oh man you in for a good ride well on today's episode we're going to take a look at well getting ready making those little pink cats for example you know the pussy hats that they all wore oh i want to get one of those so bad man well it soon as there are more available on well i guess he i could go to the big event anyway that's neither here nor there today you are going to this sets the stage you're in for a good ride without any further ado let's take a look i believe are representing all fifty states right now we have people who contribute from spain france scandinavia thailand and australia this one from emily and she said participating in this project made me feel connected to women all across the country thank you for making a stand and marching for women i wish i could be there with you but this pussy out that i will have to take my place this hat is made by a monkey go in los angeles california a woman's issue i care about is women's rights or human rights i care about all of them so thank you for marching people really want something where they can take positive  from like nine thirty and there's already so many people on the streets outside i just walks cradle and it's just like incredible decision huge march so me meghan and kenzie are marching today it's so early for me right now and oh i'm still kind of confuses if this is just like a women's rights march or like an antitrust sort of thing going on because i don't know i'm just going to see trump stuff right simple and direct you get it basically
page two of the court's order in paragraph two it's a c m s stresses that if it is required to pay wages from the limited cash in appropriated funds for this fiscal year there will not be enough cash to satisfy the intended purposes of the  look at the budget and say if we pay from here we're not going to have enough money to cover essential services but you require and by taking away any discretion as you know that inherent in the way the
is probably going to take much in excess of six years pay off this doesn't include the moment costs of litigation where he's going to need to hire experts in addition to the other costs in attorneys there are three possible called the best interest hearing and at that best interest hearing you know practically always part of the proof is that there are foster parents they have had the child for a couple years they were willing to adopt i mean that's very sad works  the possibility that enough options and even supposed to be considered illinois we went through the whole trial on the california pleadings it's basically very similar to ours except they filed two magicians one petition to free the child from custody which is basically the chorale determination and the second edition i see a different number california they come back two or three times a year when they do just one time they sent me a letter and i didn't respond to the letter quickly enough they fall down because i didn't respond to a letter about visitation was never enough it will provide forget the stepfather he's not in the picture mother is not even remarried but we have the same scenario could she have gone in and said you know he's unfit and i file a petition to terminate his coronal rights here we all but fundamentally if you look at debra rose case they make very clear distinctions that we have two very specific statutes the proceedings under the adoption act are purely statutory the proceedings of the idea more mixed up in a related adoption because you have orders pertaining to custody and visitation between the person wanting to adopt here the mother i mean because under aylmore we go through a procedure where she's the petitioner of the adoption case too and the father so you get the mother and father squaring off here on the issue of adoption and the stepfather still need to of course that absolutely but it is that adoption and
know they looked up my son i was brought up when i was eleven i came out seven from brazil i was about to tell you so i was seven years old but eight years old when i came to united states with my mother and my sister we crossed the border but we were little my father was the first one to leave mexico and come here in two thousand and then in two thousand and one my older siblings so i've been here eighteen years twenty nine years old i am twenty i am nineteen years old i've been here for twenty one years i am twenty seven years old i am twenty two years old and i am originally from mexico you do anything that will bring attention to you because you live a life of shadows you know i have been able to accomplish a lot more than when i was on documents to get a social security number loans from the meeting others and trying to tell them like it's ok when i don't even know if i may be ok every time my parents call me after eleven p m it's like my heart is racing when you are an immigrant this country you wake up every day with the fear that you could be taken away right that your family could be broken up what have you in preparing my kids of you know this sort of the risk this could happen to you nine to me i just can't imagine you know my my nieces  nephews been separated here from their parents or them going back to a country to be don't know because this is their home the shooting they shouldn't live with that fear that i have to go out with that's not a normal life late that's not normal and i know that like my friends that are  u s citizens don't go through that and nobody short i'm not leaving my home and i think you know if trump ever wanted to talk to us of want to talk to the dreamers he would realize that we love this country want to stay here and if it's taken like they can i'm family member of away from me that wall that donald trump wants to to built you know it's been a war from me where i want your for their politicians are using them as like a sport you know whether they're using it  like punching bags you are not just taking something away from us but you think in something away from this country democrats and republicans alike have to stand up for us because there are doctor beneficiaries in every state it's not just bl states this ladder it's not a white america it's not this is a land of immigrants i mean i was already a person before dark a lot of people seal well you know what's going to happen after america i'm not going down without a fight you know whatever happens next i love this country and i don't belong here i'm fighting for my family or fighting for the friends of mine that can't even stand up because they're scared we just want to stay here and contribute to this country to the economy we are good people we're not criminals of money that look
background about this case i really would statement that's pretty lengthy in this case and many of those facts might not immediately seem relevant to you when you drill down to the actual issues that were raised but it was important for me to give this court background  is you never proceed to second stage best interests and i can't take any issue with the quality of the foster parenting in this case of you know issues with that all this is about this is about the relationship between stephen's buyback and his two little girls and the fact that he's never ever going to get
its argument that the plea was involuntary due to ineffective assistance of pleas counsel for the same basis here the procedural posture is nearly identical he sure did not intend to withdraw his guilty plea he did not raise the issue in the trial court and he did not pursue a direct appeal the issue has been ends in the propriety of been his hearing where matters of record at the time the defendant entered into his guilty plea but another way to  claim does not rely on newly discovered evidence that was unavailable to petitioner at the time he pled guilty similarly these allegations with respect to ricky perry were was information that was available to the pin at the time and he pled guilty and is in opposite because he did not pursue direct appeal as did the defendant hampton i mean the question is not whether the defendant actually pursued a direct appeal the question is whether he could have raised those issues in a direct appeal  tact and issues but that is not at all she would have seen these newspaper articles but the allegations that the charges against coping with against mr heins codefendant had been dropped entirely because of the way that kerry had infected the investigation and again we're asking for here is simply to have mr hyde get counsel to help him review the propriety of the guilty plea he entered when he was a teenager and when we know that there is  so because it's a guilty plea it's very limited and it looks like they weren't because the state came in and told counsel we have these discoverable files and we want to avoid anybody violation because the personnel files we want to court order tell us to get them tio say you just filed a motion and one hand him over and the judge gives she said no motion was ever filed so the state was at least attempting to comply i don't really know if they did and given that charges were dropped
district off leaving from the menace of hostile indian young jimmy carter has trailed two suspicious characters to a deserted mine where they expect to meet the mysterious wolf man from is believed to be the leader of the indian meanwhile unknown to jimmy his friend alan scott has also arrived at the mayan accompanied by john hayden a prominent citizen who has been accused of being the little man who then is alan's  look the name is coming back you all are in the money which he backed up by actual raised with his gang of white rap and disguised as in neighbor we are now going back to
circumstances much clearer to the parties and the court if the court is required to make an inquiry into the process they claim at the time made here we're doing with issues that were raised two and a half years ago already so it's not necessarily that the rationale is that the supreme court should make should clear up its own errors should limitations for appeal and should present a necessary record with a fine and both circumstances just equally it's just a standard that's
finding are evidence from this record well then their argument to the court among other things who was then a thirty five one factors and everything else make it clear or clear that the confessional is not voluntary thank you thank you defendant and the trial prosecutor accenting never stood up and said you know he doesn't deserve it because somebody did it trial that never happened thank you very much
months i think of a change needs to calmly needs to come from the legislature i don't think that the requirement is implicit just because the supreme court put it in that it was to encourage prop eight i don't think that i don't think that's a right and now we're the ones who then have to come back and ask for you know the court in order to make a determination that we have overpaid which is what happened in v t they got another ad they paid they actually they may come back and in fact in their case it
officer performing duties for the chicago housing authority while working part time under especially on the program so here you have a county officer working for metro lay chicago police officer working for the chicago prevailing wage is a necker current employment of which he's no longer an employee or is it sufficient that there's sufficient proof in the record of what he was making at the time into the lab and th