there's no you know they do it just because they can do it and they have a possibility that they have but what you what you need to show is that this was done on account of her membership and decision says while klan membership may provide a basis for protection under the act so we start from the proposition the klan membership may provide a basis for protection under the act as your honor and she says she's clearly a member of a different clan from the clan that was attacking and raping her well it's not clear that she is because the immigration judge found that she failed to present any corroborating evidence and the evidence she did present her testimony with questionable she says your they were saying things like you are  says they were saying things referring to her attackers and the people who raped her they were saying things like you are sunni you have no power in this country see i take you here so you are bar i thought it was keeping on here and he's not here anymore we're able to do just to any members that so this clan was imposing its will on all people who were not part of this clan yes there are that's true it seems to me looking at this that the reason why she got attacked and raped was because they knew she was a toonie and that's why they singled her out indiscriminate violence against her or anyone else who has no power no defense mechanism and no plan that can protect them the leader has fled the country so because she was attacked and called it to me at the time doesn't necessarily compel the conclusion that she was attacked contemporaneously said you're the one who supported the fanatic for responded that that person was raped because of her membership and or political opinions and in that case there is more than what petition evidence the evidence establish that the person was persecuted in direct retaliation for her support of the leader there's no evidence of that here but they talk about ziad bar in the same sentence according to her and it's really just evidence that he's gone now and you're powerless not your leader is gone so i'm attacking you because you are a member of his clan it's more to show she's powerless because a leader is not there to protect her in again in right the attackers knew the petitioners and you were by name and your membership they targeted her previously to the rape attack and at the time they targeted her previously they made threats to future harm and none of that is in the record of evidence in this case so the board can recognise when there is an attack based on one of the statutorily protected grounds and that is not the case here basically with respect to the attack against the petitioner the evidence doesn't compel the conclusion that she was attacked because she was a member of the toonie clan and there boasting in case they would attack anyone who was not a member of the clan and in particular in her brief characterizing the evidence as a fair presumption which of course prove that she was up to me well indirectly yes because the immigration judge found that she lacked credibility and offered no corroborating evidence to support her claim that was the only basis of the immigration judge denial of all of her claims for relief and she  that her persecution was on account of one of those desperate dr grounds which she failed to do her claim is also undermined by several other factors first of all she stayed in somalia for three years nearly three years in the same house in which she was allegedly raped she worked she married she had a child there and she said this resigned of the peaceful and nothing forced her to leave so when she left the country she wasn't leaving because of the past persecution that she testify about she left she stated in her testimony because her husband was unable to work the farm that they owned or to own animals so the incident of which she described was not the primary emphasis for her leaving the country and she also remained in kenya for six years nothing required her to leave she stated she left voluntarily in w