MLCommons/peoples_speech_v1.0 huggingface dataset:
should still have been alive because as applied by the district it stated a breach of contract the only legal rationale for discharging mr bellows obligations under the no when the consulting services by virtue of the parties agreement which is i'm just a rebuttal of the party's agreement that it would be repaid at least in part if not in full by amounts to under the consulting services the green now i mean it's a range meant it rather unusual we could not find any case was only for the books so that was known two years in advance of the trial but for cathay to say that they would have done something different they would have question it differently or didn't have notice is a lie by the record i can't they also says well if they had known they would have thought drafts of the the promissory note but that is not credible they did not speak draft of the promissory note when it was contended and they knew that the parties agreement was that certain amounts under the
california courts cited that evidence of his pull the medical examiner's testimony that was a particularly vicious multiple stabbing attack and the witnesses here in the banging on the wall and the fact that there was obviously a major fight going on based on the disarray of the crime scene and said you know that in a way yeah he ran away but that's enough even under jackson to support the jury's verdict not been found then i could see a plausible argument that the mere fact that he was there is not enough to show that he participated he might have been an eyewitness to everything that occurred evidence that he was present well but then you got the phone calls you've got the fact that he lived there you've got it i mean there's there's a little more to show that he was used to live there just before and the phone call came in a couple of weeks before you've got about a minute ok so the idea that we need to throw out the rules because we have an educated inmate pleading his case i think is categorically opposed to the burdens of proof in our role my post condition proceedings and my post conviction proceedings are claims are different from the ones i raise on appeal and that's what the state court held when i look at these two different procedures that's what the magistrate judge implicitly said when i looked
taken on the brief recess
question of whether congress intended retroactive application of this bar to aliens convicted of one of the original aggravated felonies namely drug trafficking but the only previous decision is even considered this question in long as it is reasonable and the b a s construction of this provision particular provision is entirely reasonable in light of the overall structure of the immigration act of nine hundred ninety which includes three separate provision of only and finally it limits to use of such aggravated felonies is grounds for deportation deportation proceedings initiated after march first one thousand nine hundred one therefore while the provision relating felonies so it didn't have a prospective effective date and i think what petitioner would say is that makes many go different from our perspective so many go is not different and the result should be the same and it's still good law now after ira section three twenty one these made its aggravated felony definition applicable no matter when the conviction occurred notwithstanding any effective date no aggravated felony has a prospective effective date so the rules  still the applicable rule moreover the reasoning of to me a goal remains valid it's for you this court determined with respect to aliens convicted by guilty plea that since you're compelled to result in that case here the like the jury trial cannot possibly possibly claim that they would have acted any differently if they hadn't known about the court cited the language from the second circuit the said it would border on the absurd to argue that these aliens might not have committed their crime really doesn't have an impermissible retroactive the fact because mr lee cannot possibly argue that he would have decided not to not to commit his crimes or resist his conviction more vigorously if he had known about the aggravated felony  that have prospective effective dates now in the wake of ira no aggravated felony whatever ever have a prospect of effective date so the the exception that the board noted in a just as a practical matter can never consequences of that definition don't buy so we're not contending it doesn't fit the definition or that iraq ira didn't change the effective date of the definition for the government is pa
will ultimately prevail on his underlying claim it meets the test is whether or not it's dismay at this this evidence is essential to the full development now perhaps it would have been better had somebody i'm thinking the most likely thing is that if you ever did find them and to subpoena them and if they ever actually showed up in response to the subpoena to begin their work they'd still years i didn't see anything i don't know anything the problem your honor is that exact that's exactly where we are indicates likely what the testimony would have been and the likely testimony would be that this great would have placed up mr cole to be in the front passenger seat unlike two other would i would suggest that there is a difference a big difference between eight diligent effort and a complete fruitful successful effort one is an attempt and some effort to attempt to get to the final result of what is actually getting to the final result ok that is when mr powell returned to the scene so the gold was you know approximately the same time of the shooting on a bicycle riding away from an officer on a bicycle at a different location we had three gang members who were stopped one of them was wearing just hock regardless she goes on to  a tory quite the contrary actually and that may very well be the reason why trying to counsel couldn't locate these two girls and that they would give a statement to the police i'm sure after the police talked to them they were long gone for good reason and there's a good reason why they won't won't talk to him now
activities of the driver of the shuttle driver transporting products for your ship or solely within the state of new york where the shipper has a knowledge and admitted that at the time that the transportation commenced the ship had no intent to have to scrub oaks transported to any other destination beyond its warehouse locations and that the transportation of those products for even for your purposes only but in this case how would you respond with view that in fact there were warehouses outside of the state and this was the driver's journey was just one leg of a process  regulations are very specific in that regard the secretary of transportation has ruled that with respect to interest a transportation goods in order for that transportation to meet the interstate definition of commerce knowledge and believe you which is the case you're probably going to be discussing here today that wasn't going to sort of not just in new york but surrounding states but i don't think that's critical with respect to my client who's a shuttle drive up with respect to the other ignore what in this case was judge people's decision that look this is all part of essentially a interstate shipment operation because houses manufactured up here and it goes everywhere in the northeast or i can't i don't know where the other sh in the manufacturing plant is and therefore what your driver was part of was a link in interstate commerce and therefore under the law and cites i think it was it was fairly careful opinion what other
morning my name is rex knowledge of morrison force trying here on behalf of the petitioner mr arnold and i have three points that i'd like to make briefly first mr arnold's original two thousand and five appeal should have been granted he said that the i affirmed the immigration judge's order unfortunately based solely on the finding that mr arnold was an aggravated felon subsequently the v a reopen the case it was spontaneous and reversed itself and correctly that and that's the sole issue before in mr arnold's first petition before this court to two thousand five hundred haitian and we and that reason alone would justify vacating the v a s november two thousand and five decision and reminding for an additional hearing on mr ailes cancelation aggravated felon it didn't follow through as it was required to do the regulation eight c f r and one zero zero three point two little i require is because of the b i a three man when further proceedings are necessary and that's the decision to reopen the case to us my take is not before the court no one's challenging that decision the issue before the court is a question of law is whether having a having an open case before it be a was required by the statu a client to exercise its authority that part of the decision is not before the courts of review and that's exactly what acting on sets and again i think the board's decision points out why it's cited not to reopen for the when the board determined that he was no longer an aggregated felon it decided to absolve him of the collateral consequences but it was not required to remain for the proceedings mr arnold was similar to any other ilian who becomes eligible  presence his removal proceedings and then two years from now attempts to claim that the board should reopen because he now has ten years experience physical presence the board is simply not required to do so on and to hold otherwise would think the board sort of addressed two requests for additional habit this motion to reopen one was to say that he's no longer an active felon and the second was to allow him to apply for relief now with regard to the first one once the board looked at that state court order and determined that he was no longer now get a felon just based on the face of that document no further proceedings were necessary at that point to the extent that he was requesting relief again i would point out that mr arnold's not in this situation different than any other who becomes eligible for release later so with regard to the request to relieve proceedings we're not necessary because the board determined it would not reopen for that purpose and so i think that the board decided that it would reopen for the one person to put that is it really accurate to say that he had the opportunity i think it is to the extent that he had the opportunity to make that threshold showing which is that he met the three statutory requirements for excuse me for a cancellation of movement for permanent
the district court granted summary judgment on both counts or complaint the first one is a negligence claim and then the second was negligence per se claim based on if they  of our claim now with respect to negligent inspection and maintenance and i submit that there is no waiver because the court  myer and the important part turning to palm wonderful the important importance of that case is that it looks at requires once monthly inspection on its face regarding defects in the tracks and this claims to deal with the early yet kate upkeep of tracks based on that regulation with respect to a monthly inspections would include inspecting inspecting of a track and switches but you've touched these these regulations will not be held meaningless if the court that it's not precluded are going to not preclude it because they set a minimum under the f elaine negligence claim you must exercise agree that there was a single trauma that caused medial contrast to not give any regulations that were issued that palm wonderful such a designation not applying preclusion here would ignore congress recognition operator regulations as a federal standard that the switches be inspected more frequently than what is set forth in the effort regulations and the railroads can choose to inspect it more carefully but it does not have to on the federal regulations and the federal regulations set the standard  and there is no obligation to to for railroad to do anything beyond what the federal regulations have nor can that be the basis of liability that the railroad did fail to do something more than the federal regulations problem with the switch to either fix it or take it out of service or they can operate over it under certain circumstances so the maintenance obligation depends on that in the first instance of an inspection which would provide notice recognize this congressional mandate for national uniformity in finding preclusion national uniformity would be undermined without preclusion just as the supreme court explained back in nineteen thirty seven and scarlett the judgment of the jury cannot be substitute plan it's another words without notice there is no violation this notice requirement is unique to the tractor safety regulations it doesn't apply to a locomotive regulations it doesn't apply to  operate over it and in this case the train did not attempt to operate over that so we know from that from the from the cases that i've looked at the notice requirement that there's there's there's actual notice and there's some other sort of here one thing i think it all honestly i struggle with is whether this this case even implicates palm wonderful at all because my argument is that
responsible as an as in a case like this want to make sure that the child receives the social services the medical services the counseling services and whatever other services may be needed to deal with the condition of once a case is assigned to an l c know if the border drugs issue i would think we wouldn't have jurisdiction several of us but right now we're just looking at whether the board had to reopen it and address the results with a partial back to mexico
in the regular proceedings i know you have the state department profile for one thousand nine hundred seventy my client came into the country in ninety two he added deportation hearing in ninety seven and that profile correctly we take we take this true because there was no adverse credibility finding we think it's true that he was living with these cousins and their cousins were were tortured and persecuted because of their political activit these are people that he was living with in the same house then i presume in the same house i think together yeah then three months before the hearing the father reports step the police are now if all that it took was a state department report then theoretically every speaker made his way or her way to the united states of america and said i was politically active i was at a demonstration and chased away they tried to arrest me here's the state department for every single one of those conclusion and statement of fact and law now calling the punjab police keystone cops after they have killed close to twenty five thousand people during this period of time it's not even insensitive is no longer used as part of the counterinsurgency strategy post quote that is correct it is there to suppress political opinion there is no armed insurrection
we are here and just for the record i am going to note that judge is here with us also you will see her on the monitor at the bench and we can see her too so good morning judge growth and we are no theory of rule sixty b i think there's i mean of course anytime somebody misses a deadline there's there's an opportunity that's lost and you didn't misunderstand line that i don't see b what you are really arguing is excusable neglect you know you made a mistake everybody understands that mistake inadvertent surprise or excusable to collect but our law about what amounts to excusable neglect not the situation here this interview choir's the appellate court to uphold the district court's determination as long as that determination falls within a broad range of permissible conclusions it's not an abus that might be one thing if the case was in balance or probably not a very good case on the point that they're making which is the amount of the damages or not worry about a life billet at this point but if the judge time on reply or in its had a full opportunity to make these arguments in its initial motion to reconsider that was filed untimely in october twenty seventh and as a result anything that would have been made on reply would have been braced for the first time denial of plaintiff motion for reconsideration was appropriate here because playing to provided no grounds for the relief well sticks t v is not just a general request under the pleading ambiguity is here and there is no barriers to finding out that information on such a big neglected or not excusable the catchall of sixty six ordinary remedy i anyway we have your brief we thank you we'll take the
the president of the united states president's party first visit headquarters of the supreme allied commander atlantic admiral robert l dennison here president kennedy needs officers of the nato nations who share in the security of the fifty six nations will witness at sea and ashore the operations of the men ships and planes of the navy nerve center of the atlantic nato command is operations control center here in the event of war would come the orders sending into action the seagoing forces of fourteen nations as one navy one such ship would be the thomas edison newest of the polaris submarine within weeks the submarine will join the polaris fleet already deployed on patrol armed with sixteen polaris missiles he will add substantially to the free world ability to deter war and prevent aggression where president kennedy scans the harbor through one of edison's periscopes vice president johnson arrives aboard the attack carrier for the cruiser north hampton flagship of the atlantic fleet mann's the rail for the commander in chief emergency northhampton could service the president's mobile command post at c one of several nerve centers from which he and his staff could transmit command decision force base here at savannah has runways it can take the vigilante any question from anyone pilots an air crew man have an opportunity to be ambassadors themselves they've visited many nations but seldom breakfast a good chance to meet constituents now honors salutes and ceremonies by the fleet nowadays police are widely dispersed across thousands of miles of ocean this is a rare si among ships saluting the president the largest in the world the enterprise small fleet destroye proud dedicated men proud ships and answer to the president's question
five thousand bees to a pound and about six to eight or nine pounds in a hive that means thirty forty even fifty thousand bees and here's a brood cha chamber is a lower part of the hive the upper part of the hive as well the honey is stored that's kali it's super as a grail in between to keep the queen bee from going up and laying eggs in the honey storage place that would spoil the honey you see the queen bee is much larger than the workers so all you have to do is put down a grill as well as the workers throw and keep the queen out and your honey is a speak including making wax which is a hard job and one that is delegated to the younger a big it takes about six times as long to make a pound  waving its wings at the door of the hive to create a breeze in the hive waves its wings about two hundred times a second and it's the color hive in summer and winter it will do waving of that fertilize our blossoms and so we get our fruit bearing things are very useful to farm now the lower part of the ground chamber those flowers a very busy place the eggs are being laid by the queen and the workers are rushing around here the professor is going to try a little stunt that sugared water there and of course u has found what it is the equivalent of a gold mine a lot of sugar water in it rushing around our very active letting the other bees smell it and its activity maimed come on boys and plenty more where this came from now that's the but never use it except in battle with another queen baby begins again
in this case basically in this going o say she doesn't have notice because the process is started when the professional contractors we see from that are saying by this deadline you have to produce documents if you never got the letter it's a good process consideration but you're not answering my question can replace repeated their abuse understood i thought your case was built on the fact that the notice they sent was through not discriminated against they sent it to odd her internet account she just wasn't there and therefore didn't receive it she was discriminated because
prelinger archives you've never seen most of the films in this room aren't hollywood movies although some of them were made in hollywood i wish my baby room were all gre they tell us more about ourselves and our history than most feature films or t v programs ever could special in another gave us a new identity a feeling of belonging somewhere some of the world's oldest biggest and tallest trees quite often they've survived only by lucky paxson most of their producers went out of business schools switched from film to videotape archives to look to learn and to license material for new projects since we started we've collected over forty eight thousand films in many cases we hold the original negatives master material many thousands of ourselves don't exist anywhere else the archives covers most of the twentieth century but this collection is more than just a library of images showing the way we were more eloquently than almost any other evidence these films show how we were supposed to be they show us the role models of the past here are studious schoolchildren why you certainly kno know not all but to tell the truth mrs adams anything of mechanical or electrical nature interesting fits in with a hobby of mine is for sure not exactly time study productive workers  the happy go to spending world reflected in the windows of the suburban shopping center where they go to by well behaved teenagers these boys create their dad as though they are genuinely glad to see him as though they had really messed up way from him during the day and are anxious to talk to him and smiling house while there is something else we want to an opportunity to choose the attraction that serves the purpose for which we want is also possible for newspapers and other forms of communication to be controlled by private interests i thought i told you to kill a story didn't cost us a lot of  used our collection for teaching and learning for production and even as evidence about it is right of the voters eye level easily read and all offices and all candidates are at the same  artists students and unfounded independents get in free recently in association with the internet archive we put a thousand one titles online anyone can download these high quality digital video plans without we think this is one way to make key films available to the greatest possible number of people