general state aid years rebutted in terms of the court's consideration this period piece proves the nature of the damage the facts in this case prove the nature of the damage that can exist for a small school  seem small and right in the view of appropriate budgets but over the course of maintaining the years for up to half a teacher's salary of direct costs of funds it affects not just one or two kids but all sixty five kids was the only testimony you're hearing so the finding otherwise doesn't meet with the evidence that was presented day after hearing many years is that it's like first second third fourth is you keep going  because the root says they don't know given that the closed businesses of the two school districts and the change to the statute which prohibits us from discounting from reaching a decision on that when they're within ten miles from the school district so a ten dollars difference detriment to the school districts against the benefits to the children in fact a pocket detriment to the school district communities as well as a bed but that is provided that is significant enough to important it's rihanna but that's a substantial because there are significant testimony in the transcript as to not only the financial earth but the nature of of the students and their got to be something more than their parental preference we ran for the kids go to this school because when we moved to re engineer the simple dollar staying about just talking about moving for kids from one place to another where they have an option to go to that school because there's limits to these two school systems and because the mess is significant immediately because there just isn't significant benefit but the children associated with it were of a community that the property is naturally situated within the g be something else that changes and that might cause a school district to probably become associated with a different place over time there's no such evidence here but that's the case this was nothing more than cry for profits and because it was nothing really than parental with his family on the twenty in the record and that's mr monts evidence of the comparisons of the by a school district the bunkum school district and the rural school district as to taxes the evidence in to substantiate the figures of his nine years they claim was a two hundred something about an hour lost to the school district i think in weighing the evidence and the credibility of witnesses and all those things that the trier of fact does in this situation the original  order trustees i think they could weigh that down to see whether that is substantiated by any records or documentation anything a better nature and in this case they made a finding bet if you take all that into in the perspective which i trustees will was well within their right to make that fine they laid the evidence and they made that fine school together they can write the best together which will be two years from now and yes they will utilize the bus transportation that's not speculative that's a point and there's evidence in the record bed to google school district has no bus i'm sorry the  the children that are about to go to school then we want to talk about the extracurricular activities mr jordan testified that it was extremely important for her children to be involved in extracurricular activities she wins through those extracurricular activities that are offered by the will of the school district she also went through the of the activities that are not offered at the bulk of school districts the bomb school district call a school board member to the stand who also acknowledged helen bumi extracurricular activities were for the children but then we find out her testimony that that not only do some of these extracurricular activities not exist at the about the school district but the ones that they can provide some of those big bust to the way school district gets away from buncombe so in this situation and this ties into the involvement of the parents not only do we have a panda skin to be on call and these to be close to the school district but also places are in the position that if the kids continue to go to the bottom school district and her best to a different location that was really good for their distance from that from that school district she also testified that the school had higher test averages that we were building i think that something in the educational welfare of the children that this region of the trustees could take into consideration so if on the bottom side we had no bus transportation offered to these children some of the extracurricular activities were lacking even though some of those things were provided they're provided somewhere else and then possibly they had a plan in the future for some of those to be provid they got sleep the night before so i believe what she said but yet we also want to say that we want kids to be taking care of but it's ok for mom not to come to extracurricular activities it's ok for mom to go to go to her work and provide for her family but when it comes down to be in there somebody in fact they said it several times in this in this case it's ok for somebody else in the family to be there well how do we know one thing and say we're so concerned about these children who are not be in parents you're pointing both parents to have been on the moment the opportunity to be involved in extracurricular well i think in when you have a situation where you've got one school district that the parent can be within the thirty mile range wants to be a people find it inconvenient far all the food or reason is that they want their children to go back to the school district on isn't that kind of a priest poker you're just you know are going out same side are in close proximity to the side in the dorm families have a manufactured home that was placed on their parents property i think the record shows that it was purchased and deed in this reason all who are these individuals were all of this because they a given the financial impact as to all school districts and the direct educational benefit in the community of interest for the least particular children whom you want to be needed from both issues are personal preference th want to be involved in a particular church in their community i really they want to see involved in a particular extracurricular activity soccer and so that it's all or old in my mind the personal showed up to play because they didn't prefer that sport i doubt there were continue to be a sport so what we have is whether this school district offers for the benefit of these children and in light of that that's what my clients prefer is what's best for the children the same thing treat the districts budget particularly small school districts budget i concede that if it were chicago public school district two percent maybe a drop by profound well co found half a percent less than half a percent  district and second the differences in the bell service which we've had some discussion about may think is important to get right the council's absolutely right about what the record reflects in terms of that bus service in the plan for the parents so i also true that better plan is a future speculation about what will happen two years from now where at some point later sorry it's also true that the distance is the schools not the primary issue but random but distance for the parents work opportunities that the distance to where the parent has to be within the radius for the purpose care at a school district one of six it's certainly important that the parents be in for here but the community of interest is what we're talking about when we talk about he particular parent's preference and that particular parents will be opportunity which isn't in the growth or community and i think that's an important point it's a good location it's in some of her town but is not a problem this year because into the school district thank you