name should be reinstated as it is supported by the manifest weight of the evidence at this matter was tried on may second two thousand and six with all the issues in dispute but the meeting issue presented was whether an accident relative to just told me or i think he wanted to know why it was that the commission was struggling with the claimants testimony you know what support beyond what was there in the medical records relative to her testimony regarding this immediate onset shoulder pain and her prior mental treatment clear prior treatment for her right shoulder problems and complaint so he wanted the commission to basically set out i guess clearly as to their shoulder prior to that february thirteenth two thousand and four accident and the specifically pointed that out to judge told there where their record that evidence existed and they pointed out that she'd actually been seen by d communicating on july eighth of two thousand and three where she made very specific for sheet specific complaints of neck upper back and shoulder problems and she sought treatment for him so the commission pointed that out and the commission also p out that when the claim it was evaluated by both nurse one while there on numerous occasions as well as dr miller the company physician that there was no documented complaints of shoulder pain that all of her complaints all of the claimants complaints focused on her certainly her forearm and her hand but there was never any complaints that were documented by either  findings of credibility must be fully supported in the record that's a page fourteen of his decision when the whole point of the trial is to create the record and it's the fact finders duty  agree on it i believe that the commission was clear in why they didn't believe the claim and i believe there's sufficient evidence in the record that supports the commission realize a history of great shoulder pain the claim it was actively treating for upper arm and neck pain she had a physical therapy prescription long before the accident and she wasn't credible in her testimony she specifically denied ever having seen prior complaints or treatments relative to her right shoulder and we should spirit in fact about that on her direct exam and that simply was not true so i respectfully request that you reinstate the decision of the commission as it is supported by the manifest waited the evidence and therefore vacate the other decisions from the circuit  to respond very briefly i think if you go back and look at the records and you look at the feb thirteenth in the feb sixteenth and the february twenty fifth nurses notes as well as dr members reports from february sixteen feb twenty fifth there's no indication of upper right arm pain in fact it actually says for arm and hand that's the whole point that when the claimant first presented to the nurse on february thirteenth of two thousand and four she really made no complaints other than a broken tray and then did say oh i have a little swelling in my hand there is no complaints documented even of her upper arm and tell we get to doctor at one and i think it's the march for the nose of two thousand and four from dr alexander her primary care physician it is clear that there is no