the next matter under a care under is frederick abrams first the connecticut department of public safety before and this court sent it back for trial on the issue of race discrimination correct that's correct and then the jury found against you and that is you yes you know that was the only issue remaining after the first round of this case ok i'm here today to petition the court down but court to reverse the judgment entered after trout and district court that you're peeling you have to tell us how the jury got it wrong whether the judge missed charged that yuri or the jury misapprehended the facts or the law that is the only thing we're case against the connecticut department of public safety the airport and of report writing the judge ruled you objected to merely the judge pointing out that there was a court reporter to the jury no mc no your honor what i what i am objecting to is that the comment made by the judge about report lady the judge in his opening statement stated that there were  court reporting in a clerk if the jury needed questions to be answered by the judge in the middle of the trial  commenting on my report writing phil was an error the report of the court proceedings no report writing your honor and the report writing there's two and i know there that in these and report writing it leaves other parts that are equally important what did your just comment was elevated the defense case and tipped the scales of justice in favor of the of the defen if you can't find it i'll find it later and i want to take your time on that what i am what i am here for the appeal is because of the comment that was made to the jury and my feeling is that the jury could at independently made their own decision during deliberation by the you you saw drawling weaver warner our official court reporter yesterday a jury selection draw he will be with us throughout the trial making a record of everything that takes place during the trial and you will see her doing that introduction you know it's not the introduction you're on or not it's a additional comment that was made in the middle of the trial to find them in your brief yes you will  when the next it here is that the judge abuses power in the law in the testimony of not allowing the testimony of angela matthews the plane that had asked questions as had additional questions to ask and the matthews who was a witness in the jury was not allowed to hear this matthews reported during testimony that he could not answer questions because of attorney client privileges attorney matthews was not my it was not my attorney and as a plaintiff i waver these rights i know that great to have and matthews talk more freely talk during the trial the judge abused his power by eliminating his his his testimony my question is that if he in the client and you wait for your rights to attorney client privilege is who think you don't allow the witness to speak freely and who writes really is  the judge i've formed the jury about the importance of every poor writing i would be grateful i thought it was merely the introduction of the court reporter so i'd be grateful for that when you re that judge shot knew without any questions from the jury provided instructions on the value of report writing and i can't find those words so if you can find them  limited myself through reviewing the brief that was filed in trying to address the points that were raised in the brief intro counsel i was trial counsel oh so you heard judge that you did he ever in addition to introducing door leave warner say to the jury and this will demonstrate the importance or the value of good writing of reports no your honor judge shot  lecture to the jury about the importance of report writing no thank you thank thank your honour's your honour's with regard to mr matthews testimony again i was trial counsel i had absolutely no recollection of his testimony being limited by an attorney client privilege i went back and reviewed the transcript of mr matthews testimony to make sure i was a missing anything in his trial testimony was not limited because an attorney client privilege trunk transcript will bear that out with regard to the other points unless the court has any questions for me with regard to this appeal we will rest on our brief i am  information regarding ryan luthor and any information after two thousand and nine the court decision was not to allow it in court court by several occasions the defendant john turner gave a wrong answer and he inserted it ryan luther's name what bothers me about this is the defense attorney and john turner ignored the judge's pretrial order after being warned several times during trial not to make this comment this comment influenced the jury decision and may have tipped the scales of justice in or the the plane that during one week and this is regarded witnesses prior to the trial that the judge allow five defense witnesses to testify the plaintiff's attorney objected to the judge's decision and added these five witnesses and worse is under the law vs case doctrine because this case was here before it was decided on a previous occasion that these witnesses will not be added to the case by adding this to the case a week before the case did not give us time to the post these witnesses you knew or you knew they were from from well before the  appeal and then the third trial that we have here allowed it a week before the trial was there any agreement not to allow it i thought you just said that but i didn't find that was in the agreement not  to allow them in the in the third it was in the first trial the first trial they were not in any appeal the second trial in the second trial it was allowed a week before the trial began and there was no and i am going if there is not any other questions i'm going to rest my case and leave all the information that thank you that's in the brief to be stand on its own thank you thank you both