reasons why he as a police officer wanted to leave the police force because he was forced as a police officer to pick up young sticks like himself and beat you refused to do that he didn't want to do that and on and you have newspaper articles of events from the l a times indicating that this was some kind of frankenstein monster and it was a law unto itself you could do it could kill it could mean it could do whatever it want wall whatever you call it we wouldn't consider it a wall in this country but i don't know it's done in india he goes a while from the police and he doesn't come to this country until something like five and a half or with a long time from the time any problem ever occurred we're saying the police put upon him it's been five or six years since they ever put a clown when he filed his application got me papers so that i could sneak into the united states that's what he said in his application when it comes to when it comes to his testimony the central core of his claim of for asylum is totally left out of his application when it comes to his testimony because well the real reason was that i went back four and a half years later and got married and then the police came and raided my father's house for now i guess five years later and then i left so the real core of his troubling why can't the i j a decide that's troubling enough think it's just a phony story i disagree on that i know i didn't i didn't make a statement i asked the question basically the reason he came back had nothing to do with any claim that declaration your relying on wasn't translated that declaration was not completed by him and it's worn testament there was misstatement of the law player law is that the police can arrest people and the like it's all right and the other part is that if other sikhs live peacefully in the rest of india then there is no harm to that you just failed to be credible and he believed he could and he was relying on the state department report and he felt that if the police were looking for him under the matter of our which was heavily criticized by the circuit that the court they included copies of the passport which i believe he testified in the hearing was given to him when the agent took away the original copy they are in the record the alien excuse me petitioner testified as well that these are in fact accurate that his been who you ask either the agent got it for him to hurry things to two hundred miles south of miami or his father bought it for him according to another i think it's testimony in fact was his father bought him the i paid somebody to buy him the passport but he has maintained that it is his passport it has a date of birth his address and all of this if one looks at the document itself i think it's on the administrative record pages are one ninety six to one ninety seven the court can see that much of the information in fact reflects his own personal life according to his testimony and according to his basically says it's on the top half the holder previously traveled i think it's on passport number k four five eight four six one dated twenty we do know that the son claims tend to be very difficult because you have a different country different political situation you have different cultural backgrounds and in many cases huge disparity between this country at its lowest level and that kind of potential is available when asylum claims are presented to the asylum officers and immigration court the context is always this person's life and their claim to asylum the difficulty e if this individual was in fact farming with his father an example and they were the police were interested and recruiting and as a police officer the appropriate method as he indicated his family also pressured him to join would have been to have his uncle who was a two star something spector in the same province and saying location talk to him and convince him of that it's not credible that the police and then a three star so when you look at the entire testimony that responded and the records you have said he is the leader and he did confirm most of these has been true the real question then becomes what does make sense do you take an individual that is connected with the very well respected agency in terms of the job do you take that individual and torture him for two or three years to get him to join when his uncle's here as one of the higher highest ranking people in that police department i submit the answer is no or you have an individual who's a farmer who gets recruited going to the police goes on vacation to athens returns and then decides that he really needs to your lack of logic here maybe due to problem with the language i don't interpretation there was there was a time in the record where there was an explanation of the process rathe on whether or not the specific talking is having interpreter translated for him but i do know that much of the inconsistency is based on his own testimony his oral testimony there and  reports that stated that everybody was loving and hugging everybody in for a job in india and that's what they stand on a well founded fear he used that he didn't do any individual analysis and his reliance on the