before we begin this morning i have a pleasant emotion to offer judge gratian i move the admission of megan friedman raymond who is a member of the bar in good standing of the highest court of massachusetts the first case this morning so that we were on the same page if i understand the district court's claim construction it wasn't that data and the abstract needs to reside on be present in the database but rather for purposes of the plain language in this case the data preferred to in the claim must be dated that it's down in a database and i think the language of the plane that's closer frank to is an electronic database containing dana data about the determined subject the data being a raid in said database now that i think is if i understand correctly what the district court was using by way of reference to the term data that is to say  data in the last clause that data you interpret that is not being the provided data a reference back to means for providing data that is correct you referred to the really isn't the point that the district court was making that the information about their beetlejuice or saturn is information that was initially loaded into the database that is to say you would still is going to be a fixed number which varies from year to year but that's that it's not and that that is the kind of thing that he would say it's database information it isn't the product of a calculation and the way the idea that this can be done with a handheld but with handheld and this was also what it was doing it was different because it wasn't it's not requiring two star one star and this was no mention gay gene to take to ta between something that is within a field of view on a screen even though you may be focusing on one aspect of that screen as compared to the other and and observing something on a separate s have to take the device away from your eye and look to decide to get an image and isn't that appropriately what is described in the claim automatically presented to the user as the user observes the field if you let suggest that the information is is on the screen that the user observes within the user's field of view rather than on a s dishes as i understand it the the arguments you need to prevail not only on that point but also on the data issue because otherwise the errors if the arrows constitute data is no doubt that the arrows are presented in the paragraph talking about the microprocessor means talks about providing data about the subject and  b i believe said to us a moment ago that that data is different from the data contained in the electronic database why is his interpretation of this claim incorrect corsi the indications of direction provided by the arrows that information is never really stored in the database that's always calculated as as you go  yet that is provided to the user that's me that's a form of data a form of information that's not stored in the database so not all data has to be  your and where do we get the definition of selected three dimensional direction as being only the direction of a particular object as opposed to the direction that i choose to point blank area of the sky and i push the button presumably the screen will remain blank correct that nothing naked eye disappears ok so i punch the button and nothing sky that just selected right what i'll see are some arrow pointing me in a particular direction so i guess my question is why isn't that a selected three dimensional direction that is to say that three dimensional direction i the user have selected in which assuming now for present purposes the broader definition of the term data and which data is being presented to the screen the ar