it's not necessary in this case because of sergeant walter's testimony regarding the ford car back to him if you recall sort of almost the only state police he's charged with basically he's responsible for all  obviously the course job but if you're looking at whether or not the statute where it's clear or running begin with i think the testimony of the sergeant from the state police is responsible for administering the act statute covers everybody in the state i think it is it gives our members extra credence bag if she reads it like they had i mean so i guess we're looking for the smoking gun to see he's a resident of wisconsin to the exclusion of all the other forty nine states and i think all th there's not a smoking gun but when you look at the evidence that was presented what could have been presented better the fact that the testimony from the defendant was when he was arrested in september of two thousand and twelve at his house he told everybody that would listen he's a resident  wisconsin i was concentrators license is in the car please go take a look at it i think that shows his intent to where his head was in terms of before you said she was in the process of relocating to wisconsin when is that complete with the real king's family i believe she was a resident there but he was in the process of relocating wife and child is me ask you this question then i it's looking at it is like if somebody will give me a driver's license who weren't you going to get your darker side since you would go to the state general anywhere you have the most contacts but there is why it's got to be a separate concept and why the statute provides it separately to it's because there are instances exactly like this where somebody might be trying to get around a provision that is different you know here than is many other states where they don't have this for a fact and also at you know if you have a driver's license you have to have some additional indications of residency i guess and you know going back to why we don't play it down because you can have a driver's license and at that point had all sorts in addition that this is where you're really living and you feel this is where you presently have the intent to live and you know and make it your home and this is your primary home because obviously you could have a secondary home but still everybody get a driver's license even if you have all that that can change so while the driver's license  me here and i didn't have the notes on this part but i think the defendant even testified that here when he went to get his wisconsin license and you would think that they would have him prove some type of you know some type of documentary evidence he said that he because he had lived there before they asked him for nothing well there was certainly but that's not the point and we do we do we now take the policy position that we we look at decisions of other states and say that might have been right for you but not good enough for us well i think  interpreting our law and asking whether somebody is a non resident we have to look at whether or not that standish what happened there including the how he got his driver's license and what their driver's license means we have to determine whether or not that means that there is the primary residence my question so we're we're taking the policy position and then no matter what decisions is another state makes were researching the right to look to basically be the appellate court of their decision look at the facts they thought they had is documentary evidence which showed that he was a resident it can't get you seeing that that wasn't enough well aren't you review we will discount did partly not really because i think perhaps there are people who down you know a couple times that any type of communication to him or warning to him he says that's where his home office is he doesn't say his home office he says later in testimony that he has a home office in both but i obviously you can be you know you can be you know no name and not have a driver's license or an illinois state id and you can begin to be a resident you can be here living here or you know of one large part of your life living off the grid or whatever some people do it and don't have a driver's license it doesn't make them a nonresident just because they don't have the driver's license and in this case even though he testified that well he just i think that he got punched all the