is nothing but a catch all which catch all us do not large the powers granted to the agent number three even if the language does the activity i forgot how long ago but the issue was whether a citation would be directed against a trust well since the trust is not amenable to suit this court so that letter to six to do everything regardless of whether it's in the best interest didn't want to say that but it by implication regardless of whether it's in the best interest of france and regardless of the benefits the parties  deliver cases cited and run from says that he wants so the veep even if a language authorized transaction the barrel language authorized the transaction the principal needs to the in rich other people at the expense of the principle if the principal had one of them the the distribution of his money like  to enrich third parties no you know nor there's no cases as that exactly but there's no case other otherwise in any other jurisdiction i can find that said the opposite so i'm i'm taking the cases that ha addressed the but i also want to spend some of my time allotted for but dressing me dr election issue but based on i have little stop because i think that is an equally strong basis upon which this section but a citation to recover as the courts have acknowledged is is really a separate animal and what is happening here is as is the case here the party bringing their petition once the party against whom the petition is directed to cough up the property and to to put it back into the a state and there ought to be a requirement there were you're going to tested by motion or whatever else might be a little so as you will see is true of many of these cases even in the the other cases on citations to recover property they the basis upon which the trial word resolve this case was on the scope of authority and the trial court looked at the four corners of the power of attorney and with the benefit of hindsight could we make it attorney involved if you look at the language from the nichols power of attorney from the language from our statutory short form from turning you'll find nothing similar to the fill in the blanks type of of arrangement we have in leroy may have been saying at the time we know all right but there's a two thousand will where the rescue has left more ways we know that there is a now and then then there's the two thousand and two power of attorney now we also know power well if you look at paragraph three and again i wish it were better than what it does says make right so there's a grant and then you have to take the parentheses out but then doing best we can to construe that with words that leroy chose limitations no need no limitations and exist in the back and this is these are words that he actually put in there just doesn't come off for me this was admitted to probate and it wasn't until eleven months later after the six month time if in which the will could have been passed and that's a jurisdiction aren't any ways around it i mean i she waits until eleven months later thirty three months after her dad has asked way and then files the challenge by way of their response to you in the reply brief and this is my only opportunity to respond to some things that were brought up in the reply brief is that there is intent on this issue would make a difference therefore we're going to decided on one hundred forty seven thousand are the most obvious one is contesting the validity of the two thousand and four just so that's one scenario if there were a successful contest of the will based on lack testamentary capacity based on undue influence to the classics verbal possible yes the other of course would be the possibility of any predators or anything else that might affect the amounts once the funds are put into the estate are they just going to be there for distribution  happened in this case the point being on the election darkness we've been private that opportunity by her sitting on her hands in her keeping her money she never put her money jeopardy she kept say thank you mr palmer mr can't win something if you're not in possession of all the facts or enough facts to make an informed decision we don't have there mr palmer says are obvious scenarios where we're betting would not have a to try to get the money back that was that was three months before the six month limitation period right so there's no there's no action there's no detrimental alliance there's no first of all there's