terminations to make rulings on credibility but when they say someone is credible and then affirm affirm an arbitrary decision who says someone is credible and base their opinion and someone's credible on evidence that is actually the opposite of the evidence that they say it  unless the doctor said i made my determination after consulting the editorials of chickens or looking at the grave or hole you're stuck with the opinion so if the witness testifies to something then my straight to you is bizarre in the commission so tell us why the supervisor was incredible well i think when you read the testimony itself it actually looks better than what it sounded like and when you actually read the testimony you actually i don't even know that you can actually call it testimony to be honest and first let me  testified they saw the accident happen and confirm the same story now when we go to the supervisor the supervisor is asked whether he was told about the accident his testimony is vague unsure at best when he was asked about whether petition reporte shoulder injury his testimony was basically couldn't recall if you look at every question posed to him the question is do you recall and he says no i don't recall and then you have one point he's asked about whether he heard about the prior to march two thousand and eleven whenever he received the application for adjusting the coin his response was quote not that i can recollect i mean no i mean i'm trying to remember from back then no i don't recollect he's asked later whether the petitioner reported the accident about a week after he says he says quote i can't remember i mean no i can't remember i mean it's been three years ago i don't know i mean i can honestly said you know i replay talking to him about this that's not testimony that's not someone saying he never reported an injury that someone saying i honestly don't remember and i don't think when you when you look at that evidence you can say that's credible when you have that evidence and you have the evidence of the petitioner who testifies without question when you look at it that way i think when you look at it even if you were to say you just yours testimony is not credible say what you were to assume at trial got can't if you look at his testimony when you look at the testimony of the i think it's a combination of both i think you can actually you can observe them at trial and the commission can can look at that but the arbiter look at what you can also look at the evidence and whether or not the evidence actually supports their testimony and that's another thing i was actually going to point out and that i than eight days after the accident so i think with the governor's very very saying hey he's referring he's explaining why he didn't do it the first time because he had this conversation with the supervisor who told me he only had seventy two hours then a month later he has this because i'm suggesting that the plane was testimony credible pointing out on the wing a big credibility if you said the employer supervisor was not credible there's problems with the credibility of your point your client the claima said i don't know i can't remember anything like that he his testimony was was very clear in that he was told by his doctors he thought it would heal and when he went to go report it after he went to his doctor he was told by his fish by a supervisor it been more than seventy two what about the metaphor i think as far as the manifest weight goes i think the problem with the arbitrator's decision which was found by the commission is that the measures weight is evidence supports the finding there's there's no medical evidence to the other two to combat the fact that i'm dr miller has said that the accident causes related to the condition of it was there a problem with ken with your wife there who's paying i'm sorry but when you when you boil it all down it comes down to the fact that this guy did suffer an accident which was found by the arbitrator and however our farm fell all the testimony says he fell from a ladder landing on his right shoulder which is wh story i think that i think that's unfortunately one of those things where you go to the doctor and say i hurt my shoulder and it's and it's it's hurt me a little bit but it's not a huge problem and the doctor doesn't doubt it because you don't think that it's a huge thing but then when he hears of the point where doc my