Repository: juanfont/headscale

Issue:
[Bug] ACLs not applied on newly added nodes using OIDC
### Is this a support request?

- [x] This is not a support request

### Is there an existing issue for this?

- [x] I have searched the existing issues

### Current Behavior

I have a node used as gateway in my tailnet, ie advertising a routes. In my ACLs, I have a routes whitelist depending on the connected user.

When I add a new node, I can't reach any of the advertised routes allowed in my ACLs.

### Expected Behavior

All routes allowed in ACLs for my user should be accessible.

### Steps To Reproduce

1. Configure OIDC (in my case, I'm using Microsoft Entra)
2. Configure ACLs like the following example:
```json
{
  "acls": [
    {
      "action": "accept",
      "dst": [
        "10.102.1.7/32:*"
      ],
      "src": [
        "john.doe@example.com"
      ]
    }
  ]
}
```
3. Connect new node using tailscale command line:
```shell
tailscale up --accept-dns --accept-routes  --login-server=https://vpn.example.com
```
4. Check that `ip route show table 52` show the expected route
5. Try ssh on 10.102.1.7 -> connection hangs

### Environment

```markdown
- OS:Ubuntu 24.04
- Headscale version: 0.27.1
- Tailscale version: 1.88.4
- Number of nodes: 2
```

### Runtime environment

- [x] Headscale is behind a (reverse) proxy
- [ ] Headscale runs in a container

### Debug information

Useful information that may help find the issue:

- Same issue with v0.27.0, but **it's working as expected in v0.26.1**
- Running a headscale config reload (`systemctl reload headscale`) fixes the issue
- Tested using a non-OIDC user, this bug does not show

Debug logs:

[logs_headscale.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23545248/logs_headscale.txt)
[tailscale_status.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23545247/tailscale_status.json)
[tailscale_debug.netmap.json](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23545246/tailscale_debug.netmap.json)

Discussion:
@YouSysAdmin: I encountered the same issue: the user who logged in for the first time couldn't access the network.
Either restart headscale or re-apply the policy helped (I can't say which).@kradalby: Can you try the fix in: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/pull/2890@YouSysAdmin: Hi @kradalby 
I can theoretically check on Monday if @flodakto hasn't checked by then.

Thanks for your work.@flodakto: @kradalby Thanks for quick fix proposal, unfortunately, it does not fix the issue. I double checked, same behavior as before. Please tell me if you need new logs or debug information for troubleshooting.

@YouSysAdmin Did you gave it a try ?@YouSysAdmin: Hi @flodakto 
Sorry, we had some issues with our production environment this morning, so I haven't tested this Headscale fix.@kradalby: I've pushed some changes to https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/pull/2890 again, can either of test it?@flodakto: @kradalby Thanks for this new fix, this is now working as expected, the newly connected node is able to reach advertised routes without restarting or reloading headscale server. @YouSysAdmin: I can probably also confirm this, yesterday one new user was join and there were no complaints about access problems, at least according to the teammates.@kradalby: I've made a [rc.1 release for 0.27.2](https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/releases/tag/v0.27.2-rc.1) with fixes, would be great if you can test this and then close this (or give feedback so I can).@flodakto: Testing rc.1 release since yesterday on our test environment, no issue so far. I'll keep you posted by the end of the week.

Solution patch:
diff --git a/.github/workflows/test-integration.yaml b/.github/workflows/test-integration.yaml
index 2f82ba22..62ea3a97 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/test-integration.yaml
+++ b/.github/workflows/test-integration.yaml
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ jobs:
           - TestAuthKeyLogoutAndReloginNewUser
           - TestAuthKeyLogoutAndReloginSameUserExpiredKey
           - TestAuthKeyDeleteKey
+          - TestAuthKeyLogoutAndReloginRoutesPreserved
           - TestOIDCAuthenticationPingAll
           - TestOIDCExpireNodesBasedOnTokenExpiry
           - TestOIDC024UserCreation
@@ -42,6 +43,8 @@ jobs:
           - TestOIDCMultipleOpenedLoginUrls
           - TestOIDCReloginSameNodeSameUser
           - TestOIDCExpiryAfterRestart
+          - TestOIDCACLPolicyOnJoin
+          - TestOIDCReloginSameUserRoutesPreserved
           - TestAuthWebFlowAuthenticationPingAll
           - TestAuthWebFlowLogoutAndReloginSameUser
           - TestAuthWebFlowLogoutAndReloginNewUser
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
index 7669dfcb..82146a5e 100644
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -4,6 +4,13 @@
 
 ### Changes
 
+## 0.27.2 (2025-xx-xx)
+
+### Changes
+
+- Fix ACL policy not applied to new OIDC nodes until client restart
+  [#2890](https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/pull/2890)
+
 ## 0.27.1 (2025-11-11)
 
 **Minimum supported Tailscale client version: v1.64.0**
diff --git a/hscontrol/auth.go b/hscontrol/auth.go
index 447035da..1ab22709 100644
--- a/hscontrol/auth.go
+++ b/hscontrol/auth.go
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ import (
 	"time"
 
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
-	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types/change"
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/util"
 	"github.com/rs/zerolog/log"
 	"gorm.io/gorm"
@@ -364,16 +363,13 @@ func (h *Headscale) handleRegisterWithAuthKey(
 	// eventbus.
 	// TODO(kradalby): This needs to be ran as part of the batcher maybe?
 	// now since we dont update the node/pol here anymore
-	routeChange := h.state.AutoApproveRoutes(node)
-
-	if _, _, err := h.state.SaveNode(node); err != nil {
-		return nil, fmt.Errorf("saving auto approved routes to node: %w", err)
+	routesChange, err := h.state.AutoApproveRoutes(node)
+	if err != nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("auto approving routes: %w", err)
 	}
 
-	if routeChange && changed.Empty() {
-		changed = change.NodeAdded(node.ID())
-	}
-	h.Change(changed)
+	// Send both changes. Empty changes are ignored by Change().
+	h.Change(changed, routesChange)
 
 	// TODO(kradalby): I think this is covered above, but we need to validate that.
 	// // If policy changed due to node registration, send a separate policy change
diff --git a/hscontrol/grpcv1.go b/hscontrol/grpcv1.go
index f54835e9..3f8e75df 100644
--- a/hscontrol/grpcv1.go
+++ b/hscontrol/grpcv1.go
@@ -294,13 +294,13 @@ func (api headscaleV1APIServer) RegisterNode(
 	// ensure we send an update.
 	// This works, but might be another good candidate for doing some sort of
 	// eventbus.
-	_ = api.h.state.AutoApproveRoutes(node)
-	_, _, err = api.h.state.SaveNode(node)
+	routeChange, err := api.h.state.AutoApproveRoutes(node)
 	if err != nil {
-		return nil, fmt.Errorf("saving auto approved routes to node: %w", err)
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("auto approving routes: %w", err)
 	}
 
-	api.h.Change(nodeChange)
+	// Send both changes. Empty changes are ignored by Change().
+	api.h.Change(nodeChange, routeChange)
 
 	return &v1.RegisterNodeResponse{Node: node.Proto()}, nil
 }
diff --git a/hscontrol/oidc.go b/hscontrol/oidc.go
index 7c7895c6..22ccab06 100644
--- a/hscontrol/oidc.go
+++ b/hscontrol/oidc.go
@@ -42,10 +42,6 @@ var (
 	errOIDCAllowedUsers  = errors.New(
 		"authenticated principal does not match any allowed user",
 	)
-	errOIDCInvalidNodeState = errors.New(
-		"requested node state key expired before authorisation completed",
-	)
-	errOIDCNodeKeyMissing = errors.New("could not get node key from cache")
 )
 
 // RegistrationInfo contains both machine key and verifier information for OIDC validation.
@@ -108,16 +104,8 @@ func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) AuthURL(registrationID types.RegistrationID) string {
 		registrationID.String())
 }
 
-func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) determineNodeExpiry(idTokenExpiration time.Time) time.Time {
-	if a.cfg.UseExpiryFromToken {
-		return idTokenExpiration
-	}
-
-	return time.Now().Add(a.cfg.Expiry)
-}
-
-// RegisterOIDC redirects to the OIDC provider for authentication
-// Puts NodeKey in cache so the callback can retrieve it using the oidc state param
+// RegisterHandler registers the OIDC callback handler with the given router.
+// It puts NodeKey in cache so the callback can retrieve it using the oidc state param.
 // Listens in /register/:registration_id.
 func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) RegisterHandler(
 	writer http.ResponseWriter,
@@ -304,7 +292,7 @@ func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) OIDCCallbackHandler(
 		return
 	}
 
-	user, c, err := a.createOrUpdateUserFromClaim(&claims)
+	user, _, err := a.createOrUpdateUserFromClaim(&claims)
 	if err != nil {
 		log.Error().
 			Err(err).
@@ -323,9 +311,6 @@ func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) OIDCCallbackHandler(
 		return
 	}
 
-	// Send policy update notifications if needed
-	a.h.Change(c)
-
 	// TODO(kradalby): Is this comment right?
 	// If the node exists, then the node should be reauthenticated,
 	// if the node does not exist, and the machine key exists, then
@@ -372,6 +357,14 @@ func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) OIDCCallbackHandler(
 	httpError(writer, NewHTTPError(http.StatusGone, "login session expired, try again", nil))
 }
 
+func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) determineNodeExpiry(idTokenExpiration time.Time) time.Time {
+	if a.cfg.UseExpiryFromToken {
+		return idTokenExpiration
+	}
+
+	return time.Now().Add(a.cfg.Expiry)
+}
+
 func extractCodeAndStateParamFromRequest(
 	req *http.Request,
 ) (string, string, error) {
@@ -504,8 +497,8 @@ func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) createOrUpdateUserFromClaim(
 	}
 
 	// if the user is still not found, create a new empty user.
-	// TODO(kradalby): This might cause us to not have an ID below which
-	// is a problem.
+	// TODO(kradalby): This context is not inherited from the request, which is probably not ideal.
+	// However, we need a context to use the OIDC provider.
 	if user == nil {
 		newUser = true
 		user = &types.User{}
@@ -557,18 +550,13 @@ func (a *AuthProviderOIDC) handleRegistration(
 	// ensure we send an update.
 	// This works, but might be another good candidate for doing some sort of
 	// eventbus.
-	_ = a.h.state.AutoApproveRoutes(node)
-	_, policyChange, err := a.h.state.SaveNode(node)
+	routesChange, err := a.h.state.AutoApproveRoutes(node)
 	if err != nil {
-		return false, fmt.Errorf("saving auto approved routes to node: %w", err)
+		return false, fmt.Errorf("auto approving routes: %w", err)
 	}
 
-	// Policy updates are full and take precedence over node changes.
-	if !policyChange.Empty() {
-		a.h.Change(policyChange)
-	} else {
-		a.h.Change(nodeChange)
-	}
+	// Send both changes. Empty changes are ignored by Change().
+	a.h.Change(nodeChange, routesChange)
 
 	return !nodeChange.Empty(), nil
 }
diff --git a/hscontrol/state/state.go b/hscontrol/state/state.go
index b447dfc6..768c5c3a 100644
--- a/hscontrol/state/state.go
+++ b/hscontrol/state/state.go
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ func (s *State) SetPolicy(pol []byte) (bool, error) {
 
 // AutoApproveRoutes checks if a node's routes should be auto-approved.
 // AutoApproveRoutes checks if any routes should be auto-approved for a node and updates them.
-func (s *State) AutoApproveRoutes(nv types.NodeView) bool {
+func (s *State) AutoApproveRoutes(nv types.NodeView) (change.ChangeSet, error) {
 	approved, changed := policy.ApproveRoutesWithPolicy(s.polMan, nv, nv.ApprovedRoutes().AsSlice(), nv.AnnouncedRoutes())
 	if changed {
 		log.Debug().
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ func (s *State) AutoApproveRoutes(nv types.NodeView) bool {
 
 		// Persist the auto-approved routes to database and NodeStore via SetApprovedRoutes
 		// This ensures consistency between database and NodeStore
-		_, _, err := s.SetApprovedRoutes(nv.ID(), approved)
+		_, c, err := s.SetApprovedRoutes(nv.ID(), approved)
 		if err != nil {
 			log.Error().
 				Uint64("node.id", nv.ID().Uint64()).
@@ -848,13 +848,15 @@ func (s *State) AutoApproveRoutes(nv types.NodeView) bool {
 				Err(err).
 				Msg("Failed to persist auto-approved routes")
 
-			return false
+			return change.EmptySet, err
 		}
 
 		log.Info().Uint64("node.id", nv.ID().Uint64()).Str("node.name", nv.Hostname()).Strs("routes.approved", util.PrefixesToString(approved)).Msg("Routes approved")
+
+		return c, nil
 	}
 
-	return changed
+	return change.EmptySet, nil
 }
 
 // GetPolicy retrieves the current policy from the database.
@@ -1637,6 +1639,7 @@ func (s *State) UpdateNodeFromMapRequest(id types.NodeID, req tailcfg.MapRequest
 	var routeChange bool
 	var hostinfoChanged bool
 	var needsRouteApproval bool
+	var autoApprovedRoutes []netip.Prefix
 	// We need to ensure we update the node as it is in the NodeStore at
 	// the time of the request.
 	updatedNode, ok := s.nodeStore.UpdateNode(id, func(currentNode *types.Node) {
@@ -1661,7 +1664,6 @@ func (s *State) UpdateNodeFromMapRequest(id types.NodeID, req tailcfg.MapRequest
 		}
 
 		// Calculate route approval before NodeStore update to avoid calling View() inside callback
-		var autoApprovedRoutes []netip.Prefix
 		var hasNewRoutes bool
 		if hi := req.Hostinfo; hi != nil {
 			hasNewRoutes = len(hi.RoutableIPs) > 0
@@ -1727,7 +1729,6 @@ func (s *State) UpdateNodeFromMapRequest(id types.NodeID, req tailcfg.MapRequest
 					Strs("newApprovedRoutes", util.PrefixesToString(autoApprovedRoutes)).
 					Bool("routeChanged", routeChange).
 					Msg("applying route approval results")
-				currentNode.ApprovedRoutes = autoApprovedRoutes
 			}
 		}
 	})
@@ -1736,6 +1737,24 @@ func (s *State) UpdateNodeFromMapRequest(id types.NodeID, req tailcfg.MapRequest
 		return change.EmptySet, fmt.Errorf("node not found in NodeStore: %d", id)
 	}
 
+	if routeChange {
+		log.Debug().
+			Uint64("node.id", id.Uint64()).
+			Strs("autoApprovedRoutes", util.PrefixesToString(autoApprovedRoutes)).
+			Msg("Persisting auto-approved routes from MapRequest")
+
+		// SetApprovedRoutes will update both database and PrimaryRoutes table
+		_, c, err := s.SetApprovedRoutes(id, autoApprovedRoutes)
+		if err != nil {
+			return change.EmptySet, fmt.Errorf("persisting auto-approved routes: %w", err)
+		}
+
+		// If SetApprovedRoutes resulted in a policy change, return it
+		if !c.Empty() {
+			return c, nil
+		}
+	} // Continue with the rest of the processing using the updated node
+
 	nodeRouteChange := change.EmptySet
 
 	// Handle route changes after NodeStore update
@@ -1750,13 +1769,8 @@ func (s *State) UpdateNodeFromMapRequest(id types.NodeID, req tailcfg.MapRequest
 			routesChangedButNotApproved = true
 		}
 	}
-	if routeChange {
-		needsRouteUpdate = true
-		log.Debug().
-			Caller().
-			Uint64("node.id", id.Uint64()).
-			Msg("updating routes because approved routes changed")
-	} else if routesChangedButNotApproved {
+
+	if routesChangedButNotApproved {
 		needsRouteUpdate = true
 		log.Debug().
 			Caller().
@@ -1793,25 +1807,26 @@ func (s *State) UpdateNodeFromMapRequest(id types.NodeID, req tailcfg.MapRequest
 	return change.NodeAdded(id), nil
 }
 
-func hostinfoEqual(oldNode types.NodeView, new *tailcfg.Hostinfo) bool {
-	if !oldNode.Valid() && new == nil {
+func hostinfoEqual(oldNode types.NodeView, newHI *tailcfg.Hostinfo) bool {
+	if !oldNode.Valid() && newHI == nil {
 		return true
 	}
-	if !oldNode.Valid() || new == nil {
+
+	if !oldNode.Valid() || newHI == nil {
 		return false
 	}
 	old := oldNode.AsStruct().Hostinfo
 
-	return old.Equal(new)
+	return old.Equal(newHI)
 }
 
-func routesChanged(oldNode types.NodeView, new *tailcfg.Hostinfo) bool {
+func routesChanged(oldNode types.NodeView, newHI *tailcfg.Hostinfo) bool {
 	var oldRoutes []netip.Prefix
 	if oldNode.Valid() && oldNode.AsStruct().Hostinfo != nil {
 		oldRoutes = oldNode.AsStruct().Hostinfo.RoutableIPs
 	}
 
-	newRoutes := new.RoutableIPs
+	newRoutes := newHI.RoutableIPs
 	if newRoutes == nil {
 		newRoutes = []netip.Prefix{}
 	}



Test patch:
diff --git a/integration/auth_key_test.go b/integration/auth_key_test.go
index 514a6018..3faf793a 100644
--- a/integration/auth_key_test.go
+++ b/integration/auth_key_test.go
@@ -9,12 +9,15 @@ import (
 	"time"
 
 	v1 "github.com/juanfont/headscale/gen/go/headscale/v1"
+	policyv2 "github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/policy/v2"
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/hsic"
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/tsic"
 	"github.com/samber/lo"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
+	"tailscale.com/types/ptr"
 )
 
 func TestAuthKeyLogoutAndReloginSameUser(t *testing.T) {
@@ -540,3 +543,182 @@ func TestAuthKeyDeleteKey(t *testing.T) {
 
 	t.Logf("✓ Node successfully reconnected after its auth key was deleted")
 }
+
+// TestAuthKeyLogoutAndReloginRoutesPreserved tests that routes remain serving
+// after a node logs out and re-authenticates with the same user.
+//
+// This test validates the fix for issue #2896:
+// https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/2896
+//
+// Bug: When a node with already-approved routes restarts/re-authenticates,
+// the routes show as "Approved" and "Available" but NOT "Serving" (Primary).
+// A headscale restart would fix it, indicating a state management issue.
+//
+// The test scenario:
+// 1. Node registers with auth key and advertises routes
+// 2. Routes are auto-approved and verified as serving
+// 3. Node logs out
+// 4. Node re-authenticates with same auth key
+// 5. Routes should STILL be serving (this is where the bug manifests)
+func TestAuthKeyLogoutAndReloginRoutesPreserved(t *testing.T) {
+	IntegrationSkip(t)
+
+	user := "routeuser"
+	advertiseRoute := "10.55.0.0/24"
+
+	spec := ScenarioSpec{
+		NodesPerUser: 1,
+		Users:        []string{user},
+	}
+
+	scenario, err := NewScenario(spec)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	defer scenario.ShutdownAssertNoPanics(t)
+
+	err = scenario.CreateHeadscaleEnv(
+		[]tsic.Option{
+			tsic.WithAcceptRoutes(),
+			// Advertise route on initial login
+			tsic.WithExtraLoginArgs([]string{"--advertise-routes=" + advertiseRoute}),
+		},
+		hsic.WithTestName("routelogout"),
+		hsic.WithTLS(),
+		hsic.WithACLPolicy(
+			&policyv2.Policy{
+				ACLs: []policyv2.ACL{
+					{
+						Action:       "accept",
+						Sources:      []policyv2.Alias{policyv2.Wildcard},
+						Destinations: []policyv2.AliasWithPorts{{Alias: policyv2.Wildcard, Ports: []tailcfg.PortRange{tailcfg.PortRangeAny}}},
+					},
+				},
+				AutoApprovers: policyv2.AutoApproverPolicy{
+					Routes: map[netip.Prefix]policyv2.AutoApprovers{
+						netip.MustParsePrefix(advertiseRoute): {ptr.To(policyv2.Username(user + "@test.no"))},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+		),
+	)
+	requireNoErrHeadscaleEnv(t, err)
+
+	allClients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients()
+	requireNoErrListClients(t, err)
+	require.Len(t, allClients, 1)
+
+	client := allClients[0]
+
+	err = scenario.WaitForTailscaleSync()
+	requireNoErrSync(t, err)
+
+	headscale, err := scenario.Headscale()
+	requireNoErrGetHeadscale(t, err)
+
+	// Step 1: Verify initial route is advertised, approved, and SERVING
+	t.Logf("Step 1: Verifying initial route is advertised, approved, and SERVING at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	var initialNode *v1.Node
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(c, err)
+		assert.Len(c, nodes, 1, "Should have exactly 1 node")
+
+		if len(nodes) == 1 {
+			initialNode = nodes[0]
+			// Check: 1 announced, 1 approved, 1 serving (subnet route)
+			assert.Lenf(c, initialNode.GetAvailableRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 available route, got %v", initialNode.GetAvailableRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, initialNode.GetApprovedRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 approved route, got %v", initialNode.GetApprovedRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 serving (subnet) route, got %v - THIS IS THE BUG if empty", initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes())
+			assert.Contains(c, initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes(), advertiseRoute,
+				"Subnet routes should contain %s", advertiseRoute)
+		}
+	}, 30*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "initial route should be serving")
+
+	require.NotNil(t, initialNode, "Initial node should be found")
+	initialNodeID := initialNode.GetId()
+	t.Logf("Initial node ID: %d, Available: %v, Approved: %v, Serving: %v",
+		initialNodeID, initialNode.GetAvailableRoutes(), initialNode.GetApprovedRoutes(), initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes())
+
+	// Step 2: Logout
+	t.Logf("Step 2: Logging out at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	err = client.Logout()
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Wait for logout to complete
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		status, err := client.Status()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Equal(ct, "NeedsLogin", status.BackendState, "Expected NeedsLogin state after logout")
+	}, 30*time.Second, 1*time.Second, "waiting for logout to complete")
+
+	t.Logf("Logout completed, node should still exist in database")
+
+	// Verify node still exists (routes should still be in DB)
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(c, err)
+		assert.Len(c, nodes, 1, "Node should persist in database after logout")
+	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "node should persist after logout")
+
+	// Step 3: Re-authenticate with the SAME user (using auth key)
+	t.Logf("Step 3: Re-authenticating with same user at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	userMap, err := headscale.MapUsers()
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	key, err := scenario.CreatePreAuthKey(userMap[user].GetId(), true, false)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Re-login - the container already has extraLoginArgs with --advertise-routes
+	// from the initial setup, so routes will be advertised on re-login
+	err = scenario.RunTailscaleUp(user, headscale.GetEndpoint(), key.GetKey())
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Wait for client to be running
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		status, err := client.Status()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Equal(ct, "Running", status.BackendState, "Expected Running state after relogin")
+	}, 30*time.Second, 1*time.Second, "waiting for relogin to complete")
+
+	t.Logf("Re-authentication completed at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	// Step 4: THE CRITICAL TEST - Verify routes are STILL SERVING after re-authentication
+	t.Logf("Step 4: Verifying routes are STILL SERVING after re-authentication at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(c, err)
+		assert.Len(c, nodes, 1, "Should still have exactly 1 node after relogin")
+
+		if len(nodes) == 1 {
+			node := nodes[0]
+			t.Logf("After relogin - Available: %v, Approved: %v, Serving: %v",
+				node.GetAvailableRoutes(), node.GetApprovedRoutes(), node.GetSubnetRoutes())
+
+			// This is where issue #2896 manifests:
+			// - Available shows the route (from Hostinfo.RoutableIPs)
+			// - Approved shows the route (from ApprovedRoutes)
+			// - BUT Serving (SubnetRoutes/PrimaryRoutes) is EMPTY!
+			assert.Lenf(c, node.GetAvailableRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 available route after relogin, got %v", node.GetAvailableRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, node.GetApprovedRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 approved route after relogin, got %v", node.GetApprovedRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, node.GetSubnetRoutes(), 1,
+				"BUG #2896: Node should have 1 SERVING route after relogin, got %v", node.GetSubnetRoutes())
+			assert.Contains(c, node.GetSubnetRoutes(), advertiseRoute,
+				"BUG #2896: Subnet routes should contain %s after relogin", advertiseRoute)
+
+			// Also verify node ID was preserved (same node, not new registration)
+			assert.Equal(c, initialNodeID, node.GetId(),
+				"Node ID should be preserved after same-user relogin")
+		}
+	}, 30*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond,
+		"BUG #2896: routes should remain SERVING after logout/relogin with same user")
+
+	t.Logf("Test completed - verifying issue #2896 fix")
+}
diff --git a/integration/auth_oidc_test.go b/integration/auth_oidc_test.go
index 9040e5fd..8d2f648a 100644
--- a/integration/auth_oidc_test.go
+++ b/integration/auth_oidc_test.go
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
 	"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp/cmpopts"
 	v1 "github.com/juanfont/headscale/gen/go/headscale/v1"
+	policyv2 "github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/policy/v2"
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/types"
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/hsic"
 	"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/tsic"
@@ -19,6 +20,8 @@ import (
 	"github.com/samber/lo"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+	"tailscale.com/ipn/ipnstate"
+	"tailscale.com/tailcfg"
 )
 
 func TestOIDCAuthenticationPingAll(t *testing.T) {
@@ -1422,3 +1425,490 @@ func TestOIDCExpiryAfterRestart(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	}, 30*time.Second, 1*time.Second, "validating expiry preservation after restart")
 }
+
+// TestOIDCACLPolicyOnJoin validates that ACL policies are correctly applied
+// to newly joined OIDC nodes without requiring a client restart.
+//
+// This test validates the fix for issue #2888:
+// https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/2888
+//
+// Bug: Nodes joining via OIDC authentication did not get the appropriate ACL
+// policy applied until they restarted their client. This was a regression
+// introduced in v0.27.0.
+//
+// The test scenario:
+// 1. Creates a CLI user (gateway) with a node advertising a route
+// 2. Sets up ACL policy allowing all nodes to access advertised routes
+// 3. OIDC user authenticates and joins with a new node
+// 4. Verifies that the OIDC user's node IMMEDIATELY sees the advertised route
+//
+// Expected behavior:
+// - Without fix: OIDC node cannot see the route (PrimaryRoutes is nil/empty)
+// - With fix: OIDC node immediately sees the route in PrimaryRoutes
+//
+// Root cause: The buggy code called a.h.Change(c) immediately after user
+// creation but BEFORE node registration completed, creating a race condition
+// where policy change notifications were sent asynchronously before the node
+// was fully registered.
+func TestOIDCACLPolicyOnJoin(t *testing.T) {
+	IntegrationSkip(t)
+
+	gatewayUser := "gateway"
+	oidcUser := "oidcuser"
+
+	spec := ScenarioSpec{
+		NodesPerUser: 1,
+		Users:        []string{gatewayUser},
+		OIDCUsers: []mockoidc.MockUser{
+			oidcMockUser(oidcUser, true),
+		},
+	}
+
+	scenario, err := NewScenario(spec)
+
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	defer scenario.ShutdownAssertNoPanics(t)
+
+	oidcMap := map[string]string{
+		"HEADSCALE_OIDC_ISSUER":             scenario.mockOIDC.Issuer(),
+		"HEADSCALE_OIDC_CLIENT_ID":          scenario.mockOIDC.ClientID(),
+		"CREDENTIALS_DIRECTORY_TEST":        "/tmp",
+		"HEADSCALE_OIDC_CLIENT_SECRET_PATH": "${CREDENTIALS_DIRECTORY_TEST}/hs_client_oidc_secret",
+	}
+
+	// Create headscale environment with ACL policy that allows OIDC user
+	// to access routes advertised by gateway user
+	err = scenario.CreateHeadscaleEnvWithLoginURL(
+		[]tsic.Option{
+			tsic.WithAcceptRoutes(),
+		},
+		hsic.WithTestName("oidcaclpolicy"),
+		hsic.WithConfigEnv(oidcMap),
+		hsic.WithTLS(),
+		hsic.WithFileInContainer("/tmp/hs_client_oidc_secret", []byte(scenario.mockOIDC.ClientSecret())),
+		hsic.WithACLPolicy(
+			&policyv2.Policy{
+				ACLs: []policyv2.ACL{
+					{
+						Action:  "accept",
+						Sources: []policyv2.Alias{prefixp("100.64.0.0/10")},
+						Destinations: []policyv2.AliasWithPorts{
+							aliasWithPorts(prefixp("100.64.0.0/10"), tailcfg.PortRangeAny),
+							aliasWithPorts(prefixp("10.33.0.0/24"), tailcfg.PortRangeAny),
+							aliasWithPorts(prefixp("10.44.0.0/24"), tailcfg.PortRangeAny),
+						},
+					},
+				},
+				AutoApprovers: policyv2.AutoApproverPolicy{
+					Routes: map[netip.Prefix]policyv2.AutoApprovers{
+						netip.MustParsePrefix("10.33.0.0/24"): {usernameApprover("gateway@test.no"), usernameApprover("oidcuser@headscale.net"), usernameApprover("jane.doe@example.com")},
+						netip.MustParsePrefix("10.44.0.0/24"): {usernameApprover("gateway@test.no"), usernameApprover("oidcuser@headscale.net"), usernameApprover("jane.doe@example.com")},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+		),
+	)
+	requireNoErrHeadscaleEnv(t, err)
+
+	headscale, err := scenario.Headscale()
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Get the gateway client (CLI user) - only one client at first
+	allClients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients()
+	requireNoErrListClients(t, err)
+	require.Len(t, allClients, 1, "Should have exactly 1 client (gateway) before OIDC login")
+
+	gatewayClient := allClients[0]
+
+	// Wait for initial sync (gateway logs in)
+	err = scenario.WaitForTailscaleSync()
+	requireNoErrSync(t, err)
+
+	// Gateway advertises route 10.33.0.0/24
+	advertiseRoute := "10.33.0.0/24"
+	command := []string{
+		"tailscale",
+		"set",
+		"--advertise-routes=" + advertiseRoute,
+	}
+	_, _, err = gatewayClient.Execute(command)
+	require.NoErrorf(t, err, "failed to advertise route: %s", err)
+
+	// Wait for route advertisement to propagate
+	var gatewayNodeID uint64
+
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Len(ct, nodes, 1)
+
+		gatewayNode := nodes[0]
+		gatewayNodeID = gatewayNode.GetId()
+		assert.Len(ct, gatewayNode.GetAvailableRoutes(), 1)
+		assert.Contains(ct, gatewayNode.GetAvailableRoutes(), advertiseRoute)
+	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "route advertisement should propagate to headscale")
+
+	// Approve the advertised route
+	_, err = headscale.ApproveRoutes(
+		gatewayNodeID,
+		[]netip.Prefix{netip.MustParsePrefix(advertiseRoute)},
+	)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Wait for route approval to propagate
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Len(ct, nodes, 1)
+
+		gatewayNode := nodes[0]
+		assert.Len(ct, gatewayNode.GetApprovedRoutes(), 1)
+		assert.Contains(ct, gatewayNode.GetApprovedRoutes(), advertiseRoute)
+	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "route approval should propagate to headscale")
+
+	// NOW create the OIDC user by having them join
+	// This is where issue #2888 manifests - the new OIDC node should immediately
+	// see the gateway's advertised route
+	t.Logf("OIDC user joining at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	// Create OIDC user's tailscale node
+	oidcAdvertiseRoute := "10.44.0.0/24"
+	oidcClient, err := scenario.CreateTailscaleNode(
+		"head",
+		tsic.WithNetwork(scenario.networks[scenario.testDefaultNetwork]),
+		tsic.WithAcceptRoutes(),
+		tsic.WithExtraLoginArgs([]string{"--advertise-routes=" + oidcAdvertiseRoute}),
+	)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// OIDC login happens automatically via LoginWithURL
+	loginURL, err := oidcClient.LoginWithURL(headscale.GetEndpoint())
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	_, err = doLoginURL(oidcClient.Hostname(), loginURL)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	t.Logf("OIDC user logged in successfully at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	// THE CRITICAL TEST: Verify that the OIDC user's node can IMMEDIATELY
+	// see the gateway's advertised route WITHOUT needing a client restart.
+	//
+	// This is where the bug manifests:
+	// - Without fix: PrimaryRoutes will be nil/empty
+	// - With fix: PrimaryRoutes immediately contains the advertised route
+	t.Logf("Verifying OIDC user can immediately see advertised routes at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		status, err := oidcClient.Status()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+
+		// Find the gateway peer in the OIDC user's peer list
+		var gatewayPeer *ipnstate.PeerStatus
+
+		for _, peerKey := range status.Peers() {
+			peer := status.Peer[peerKey]
+			// Gateway is the peer that's not the OIDC user
+			if peer.UserID != status.Self.UserID {
+				gatewayPeer = peer
+				break
+			}
+		}
+
+		assert.NotNil(ct, gatewayPeer, "OIDC user should see gateway as peer")
+
+		if gatewayPeer != nil {
+			// This is the critical assertion - PrimaryRoutes should NOT be nil
+			assert.NotNil(ct, gatewayPeer.PrimaryRoutes,
+				"BUG #2888: Gateway peer PrimaryRoutes is nil - ACL policy not applied to new OIDC node!")
+
+			if gatewayPeer.PrimaryRoutes != nil {
+				routes := gatewayPeer.PrimaryRoutes.AsSlice()
+				assert.Contains(ct, routes, netip.MustParsePrefix(advertiseRoute),
+					"OIDC user should immediately see gateway's advertised route %s in PrimaryRoutes", advertiseRoute)
+				t.Logf("SUCCESS: OIDC user can see advertised route %s in gateway's PrimaryRoutes", advertiseRoute)
+			}
+
+			// Also verify AllowedIPs includes the route
+			if gatewayPeer.AllowedIPs != nil && gatewayPeer.AllowedIPs.Len() > 0 {
+				allowedIPs := gatewayPeer.AllowedIPs.AsSlice()
+				t.Logf("Gateway peer AllowedIPs: %v", allowedIPs)
+			}
+		}
+	}, 15*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond,
+		"OIDC user should immediately see gateway's advertised route without client restart (issue #2888)")
+
+	// Verify that the Gateway node sees the OIDC node's advertised route (AutoApproveRoutes check)
+	t.Logf("Verifying Gateway user can immediately see OIDC advertised routes at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		status, err := gatewayClient.Status()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+
+		// Find the OIDC peer in the Gateway user's peer list
+		var oidcPeer *ipnstate.PeerStatus
+
+		for _, peerKey := range status.Peers() {
+			peer := status.Peer[peerKey]
+			if peer.UserID != status.Self.UserID {
+				oidcPeer = peer
+				break
+			}
+		}
+
+		assert.NotNil(ct, oidcPeer, "Gateway user should see OIDC user as peer")
+
+		if oidcPeer != nil {
+			assert.NotNil(ct, oidcPeer.PrimaryRoutes,
+				"BUG: OIDC peer PrimaryRoutes is nil - AutoApproveRoutes failed or overwritten!")
+
+			if oidcPeer.PrimaryRoutes != nil {
+				routes := oidcPeer.PrimaryRoutes.AsSlice()
+				assert.Contains(ct, routes, netip.MustParsePrefix(oidcAdvertiseRoute),
+					"Gateway user should immediately see OIDC's advertised route %s in PrimaryRoutes", oidcAdvertiseRoute)
+			}
+		}
+	}, 15*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond,
+		"Gateway user should immediately see OIDC's advertised route (AutoApproveRoutes check)")
+
+	// Additional validation: Verify nodes in headscale match expectations
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Len(ct, nodes, 2, "Should have 2 nodes (gateway + oidcuser)")
+
+		// Verify OIDC user was created correctly
+		users, err := headscale.ListUsers()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		// Note: mockoidc may create additional default users (like jane.doe)
+		// so we check for at least 2 users, not exactly 2
+		assert.GreaterOrEqual(ct, len(users), 2, "Should have at least 2 users (gateway CLI user + oidcuser)")
+
+		// Find gateway CLI user
+		var gatewayUser *v1.User
+
+		for _, user := range users {
+			if user.GetName() == "gateway" && user.GetProvider() == "" {
+				gatewayUser = user
+				break
+			}
+		}
+
+		assert.NotNil(ct, gatewayUser, "Should have gateway CLI user")
+
+		if gatewayUser != nil {
+			assert.Equal(ct, "gateway", gatewayUser.GetName())
+		}
+
+		// Find OIDC user
+		var oidcUserFound *v1.User
+
+		for _, user := range users {
+			if user.GetName() == "oidcuser" && user.GetProvider() == "oidc" {
+				oidcUserFound = user
+				break
+			}
+		}
+
+		assert.NotNil(ct, oidcUserFound, "Should have OIDC user")
+
+		if oidcUserFound != nil {
+			assert.Equal(ct, "oidcuser", oidcUserFound.GetName())
+			assert.Equal(ct, "oidcuser@headscale.net", oidcUserFound.GetEmail())
+		}
+	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "headscale should have correct users and nodes")
+
+	t.Logf("Test completed successfully - issue #2888 fix validated")
+}
+
+// TestOIDCReloginSameUserRoutesPreserved tests the scenario where:
+// - A node logs in via OIDC and advertises routes
+// - Routes are auto-approved and verified as SERVING
+// - The node logs out
+// - The node logs back in as the same user
+// - Routes should STILL be SERVING (not just approved/available)
+//
+// This test validates the fix for issue #2896:
+// https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/2896
+//
+// Bug: When a node with already-approved routes restarts/re-authenticates,
+// the routes show as "Approved" and "Available" but NOT "Serving" (Primary).
+// A headscale restart would fix it, indicating a state management issue.
+func TestOIDCReloginSameUserRoutesPreserved(t *testing.T) {
+	IntegrationSkip(t)
+
+	advertiseRoute := "10.55.0.0/24"
+
+	// Create scenario with same user for both login attempts
+	scenario, err := NewScenario(ScenarioSpec{
+		OIDCUsers: []mockoidc.MockUser{
+			oidcMockUser("user1", true), // Initial login
+			oidcMockUser("user1", true), // Relogin with same user
+		},
+	})
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	defer scenario.ShutdownAssertNoPanics(t)
+
+	oidcMap := map[string]string{
+		"HEADSCALE_OIDC_ISSUER":             scenario.mockOIDC.Issuer(),
+		"HEADSCALE_OIDC_CLIENT_ID":          scenario.mockOIDC.ClientID(),
+		"CREDENTIALS_DIRECTORY_TEST":        "/tmp",
+		"HEADSCALE_OIDC_CLIENT_SECRET_PATH": "${CREDENTIALS_DIRECTORY_TEST}/hs_client_oidc_secret",
+	}
+
+	err = scenario.CreateHeadscaleEnvWithLoginURL(
+		[]tsic.Option{
+			tsic.WithAcceptRoutes(),
+		},
+		hsic.WithTestName("oidcrouterelogin"),
+		hsic.WithConfigEnv(oidcMap),
+		hsic.WithTLS(),
+		hsic.WithFileInContainer("/tmp/hs_client_oidc_secret", []byte(scenario.mockOIDC.ClientSecret())),
+		hsic.WithEmbeddedDERPServerOnly(),
+		hsic.WithDERPAsIP(),
+		hsic.WithACLPolicy(
+			&policyv2.Policy{
+				ACLs: []policyv2.ACL{
+					{
+						Action:       "accept",
+						Sources:      []policyv2.Alias{policyv2.Wildcard},
+						Destinations: []policyv2.AliasWithPorts{{Alias: policyv2.Wildcard, Ports: []tailcfg.PortRange{tailcfg.PortRangeAny}}},
+					},
+				},
+				AutoApprovers: policyv2.AutoApproverPolicy{
+					Routes: map[netip.Prefix]policyv2.AutoApprovers{
+						netip.MustParsePrefix(advertiseRoute): {usernameApprover("user1@headscale.net")},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+		),
+	)
+	requireNoErrHeadscaleEnv(t, err)
+
+	headscale, err := scenario.Headscale()
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Create client with route advertisement
+	ts, err := scenario.CreateTailscaleNode(
+		"unstable",
+		tsic.WithNetwork(scenario.networks[scenario.testDefaultNetwork]),
+		tsic.WithAcceptRoutes(),
+		tsic.WithExtraLoginArgs([]string{"--advertise-routes=" + advertiseRoute}),
+	)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Initial login as user1
+	u, err := ts.LoginWithURL(headscale.GetEndpoint())
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	_, err = doLoginURL(ts.Hostname(), u)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Wait for client to be running
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		status, err := ts.Status()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Equal(ct, "Running", status.BackendState)
+	}, 30*time.Second, 1*time.Second, "waiting for initial login to complete")
+
+	// Step 1: Verify initial route is advertised, approved, and SERVING
+	t.Logf("Step 1: Verifying initial route is advertised, approved, and SERVING at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	var initialNode *v1.Node
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(c, err)
+		assert.Len(c, nodes, 1, "Should have exactly 1 node")
+
+		if len(nodes) == 1 {
+			initialNode = nodes[0]
+			// Check: 1 announced, 1 approved, 1 serving (subnet route)
+			assert.Lenf(c, initialNode.GetAvailableRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 available route, got %v", initialNode.GetAvailableRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, initialNode.GetApprovedRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 approved route, got %v", initialNode.GetApprovedRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 serving (subnet) route, got %v - THIS IS THE BUG if empty", initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes())
+			assert.Contains(c, initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes(), advertiseRoute,
+				"Subnet routes should contain %s", advertiseRoute)
+		}
+	}, 30*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "initial route should be serving")
+
+	require.NotNil(t, initialNode, "Initial node should be found")
+	initialNodeID := initialNode.GetId()
+	t.Logf("Initial node ID: %d, Available: %v, Approved: %v, Serving: %v",
+		initialNodeID, initialNode.GetAvailableRoutes(), initialNode.GetApprovedRoutes(), initialNode.GetSubnetRoutes())
+
+	// Step 2: Logout
+	t.Logf("Step 2: Logging out at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	err = ts.Logout()
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Wait for logout to complete
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		status, err := ts.Status()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Equal(ct, "NeedsLogin", status.BackendState, "Expected NeedsLogin state after logout")
+	}, 30*time.Second, 1*time.Second, "waiting for logout to complete")
+
+	t.Logf("Logout completed, node should still exist in database")
+
+	// Verify node still exists (routes should still be in DB)
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(c, err)
+		assert.Len(c, nodes, 1, "Node should persist in database after logout")
+	}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond, "node should persist after logout")
+
+	// Step 3: Re-authenticate via OIDC as the same user
+	t.Logf("Step 3: Re-authenticating with same user via OIDC at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	u, err = ts.LoginWithURL(headscale.GetEndpoint())
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	_, err = doLoginURL(ts.Hostname(), u)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Wait for client to be running
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(ct *assert.CollectT) {
+		status, err := ts.Status()
+		assert.NoError(ct, err)
+		assert.Equal(ct, "Running", status.BackendState, "Expected Running state after relogin")
+	}, 30*time.Second, 1*time.Second, "waiting for relogin to complete")
+
+	t.Logf("Re-authentication completed at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	// Step 4: THE CRITICAL TEST - Verify routes are STILL SERVING after re-authentication
+	t.Logf("Step 4: Verifying routes are STILL SERVING after re-authentication at %s", time.Now().Format(TimestampFormat))
+
+	assert.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {
+		nodes, err := headscale.ListNodes()
+		assert.NoError(c, err)
+		assert.Len(c, nodes, 1, "Should still have exactly 1 node after relogin")
+
+		if len(nodes) == 1 {
+			node := nodes[0]
+			t.Logf("After relogin - Available: %v, Approved: %v, Serving: %v",
+				node.GetAvailableRoutes(), node.GetApprovedRoutes(), node.GetSubnetRoutes())
+
+			// This is where issue #2896 manifests:
+			// - Available shows the route (from Hostinfo.RoutableIPs)
+			// - Approved shows the route (from ApprovedRoutes)
+			// - BUT Serving (SubnetRoutes/PrimaryRoutes) is EMPTY!
+			assert.Lenf(c, node.GetAvailableRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 available route after relogin, got %v", node.GetAvailableRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, node.GetApprovedRoutes(), 1,
+				"Node should have 1 approved route after relogin, got %v", node.GetApprovedRoutes())
+			assert.Lenf(c, node.GetSubnetRoutes(), 1,
+				"BUG #2896: Node should have 1 SERVING route after relogin, got %v", node.GetSubnetRoutes())
+			assert.Contains(c, node.GetSubnetRoutes(), advertiseRoute,
+				"BUG #2896: Subnet routes should contain %s after relogin", advertiseRoute)
+
+			// Also verify node ID was preserved (same node, not new registration)
+			assert.Equal(c, initialNodeID, node.GetId(),
+				"Node ID should be preserved after same-user relogin")
+		}
+	}, 30*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond,
+		"BUG #2896: routes should remain SERVING after OIDC logout/relogin with same user")
+
+	t.Logf("Test completed - verifying issue #2896 fix for OIDC")
+}
diff --git a/integration/route_test.go b/integration/route_test.go
index 18abc9a8..39292806 100644
--- a/integration/route_test.go
+++ b/integration/route_test.go
@@ -2228,9 +2228,9 @@ func TestAutoApproveMultiNetwork(t *testing.T) {
 	// - Both policy modes (database, file)
 	// - Both advertiseDuringUp values (true, false)
 	minimalTestSet := map[string]bool{
-		"authkey-tag-advertiseduringup-false-pol-database":  true, // authkey + database + tag + false
-		"webauth-user-advertiseduringup-true-pol-file":      true, // webauth + file + user + true
-		"authkey-group-advertiseduringup-false-pol-file":    true, // authkey + file + group + false
+		"authkey-tag-advertiseduringup-false-pol-database": true, // authkey + database + tag + false
+		"webauth-user-advertiseduringup-true-pol-file":     true, // webauth + file + user + true
+		"authkey-group-advertiseduringup-false-pol-file":   true, // authkey + file + group + false
 	}
 
 	for _, tt := range tests {
@@ -2324,7 +2324,11 @@ func TestAutoApproveMultiNetwork(t *testing.T) {
 					// into a HA node, which isn't something we are testing here.
 					routerUsernet1, err := scenario.CreateTailscaleNode("head", tsOpts...)
 					require.NoError(t, err)
-					defer routerUsernet1.Shutdown()
+
+					defer func() {
+						_, _, err := routerUsernet1.Shutdown()
+						require.NoError(t, err)
+					}()
 
 					if tt.withURL {
 						u, err := routerUsernet1.LoginWithURL(headscale.GetEndpoint())
@@ -2333,7 +2337,8 @@ func TestAutoApproveMultiNetwork(t *testing.T) {
 						body, err := doLoginURL(routerUsernet1.Hostname(), u)
 						require.NoError(t, err)
 
-						scenario.runHeadscaleRegister("user1", body)
+						err = scenario.runHeadscaleRegister("user1", body)
+						require.NoError(t, err)
 
 						// Wait for the client to sync with the server after webauth registration.
 						// Unlike authkey login which blocks until complete, webauth registration
@@ -2352,6 +2357,11 @@ func TestAutoApproveMultiNetwork(t *testing.T) {
 					}
 					// extra creation end.
 
+					// Wait for the node to be fully running before getting its ID
+					// This is especially important for webauth flow where login is asynchronous
+					err = routerUsernet1.WaitForRunning(30 * time.Second)
+					require.NoError(t, err)
+
 					routerUsernet1ID := routerUsernet1.MustID()
 
 					web := services[0]
@@ -2739,16 +2749,6 @@ func TestAutoApproveMultiNetwork(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 }
 
-func assertTracerouteViaIP(t *testing.T, tr util.Traceroute, ip netip.Addr) {
-	t.Helper()
-
-	require.NotNil(t, tr)
-	require.True(t, tr.Success)
-	require.NoError(t, tr.Err)
-	require.NotEmpty(t, tr.Route)
-	require.Equal(t, tr.Route[0].IP, ip)
-}
-
 // assertTracerouteViaIPWithCollect is a version of assertTracerouteViaIP that works with assert.CollectT.
 func assertTracerouteViaIPWithCollect(c *assert.CollectT, tr util.Traceroute, ip netip.Addr) {
 	assert.NotNil(c, tr)
@@ -2762,30 +2762,6 @@ func assertTracerouteViaIPWithCollect(c *assert.CollectT, tr util.Traceroute, ip
 	}
 }
 
-// requirePeerSubnetRoutes asserts that the peer has the expected subnet routes.
-func requirePeerSubnetRoutes(t *testing.T, status *ipnstate.PeerStatus, expected []netip.Prefix) {
-	t.Helper()
-	if status.AllowedIPs.Len() <= 2 && len(expected) != 0 {
-		t.Fatalf("peer %s (%s) has no subnet routes, expected %v", status.HostName, status.ID, expected)
-		return
-	}
-
-	if len(expected) == 0 {
-		expected = []netip.Prefix{}
-	}
-
-	got := slicesx.Filter(nil, status.AllowedIPs.AsSlice(), func(p netip.Prefix) bool {
-		if tsaddr.IsExitRoute(p) {
-			return true
-		}
-		return !slices.ContainsFunc(status.TailscaleIPs, p.Contains)
-	})
-
-	if diff := cmpdiff.Diff(expected, got, util.PrefixComparer, cmpopts.EquateEmpty()); diff != "" {
-		t.Fatalf("peer %s (%s) subnet routes, unexpected result (-want +got):\n%s", status.HostName, status.ID, diff)
-	}
-}
-
 func SortPeerStatus(a, b *ipnstate.PeerStatus) int {
 	return cmp.Compare(a.ID, b.ID)
 }
@@ -2830,13 +2806,6 @@ func requirePeerSubnetRoutesWithCollect(c *assert.CollectT, status *ipnstate.Pee
 	}
 }
 
-func requireNodeRouteCount(t *testing.T, node *v1.Node, announced, approved, subnet int) {
-	t.Helper()
-	require.Lenf(t, node.GetAvailableRoutes(), announced, "expected %q announced routes(%v) to have %d route, had %d", node.GetName(), node.GetAvailableRoutes(), announced, len(node.GetAvailableRoutes()))
-	require.Lenf(t, node.GetApprovedRoutes(), approved, "expected %q approved routes(%v) to have %d route, had %d", node.GetName(), node.GetApprovedRoutes(), approved, len(node.GetApprovedRoutes()))
-	require.Lenf(t, node.GetSubnetRoutes(), subnet, "expected %q subnet routes(%v) to have %d route, had %d", node.GetName(), node.GetSubnetRoutes(), subnet, len(node.GetSubnetRoutes()))
-}
-
 func requireNodeRouteCountWithCollect(c *assert.CollectT, node *v1.Node, announced, approved, subnet int) {
 	assert.Lenf(c, node.GetAvailableRoutes(), announced, "expected %q announced routes(%v) to have %d route, had %d", node.GetName(), node.GetAvailableRoutes(), announced, len(node.GetAvailableRoutes()))
 	assert.Lenf(c, node.GetApprovedRoutes(), approved, "expected %q approved routes(%v) to have %d route, had %d", node.GetName(), node.GetApprovedRoutes(), approved, len(node.GetApprovedRoutes()))