Definition: In this task, you're given a sentence and your task is to generate a simplified sentence that focuses on lexical paraphrasing from the original sentence given in the input.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: a georgian inscription around the drum attests his name.
Output: there is a georgian inscription around the drum to confirm his name.

Positive Example 2 -
Input: it is particularly famous for the cultivation of kiwifruit.
Output: it is mostly famous for the growing of kiwifruit.

Negative Example 1 -
Input: a hunting dog refers to any dog who assists humans in hunting.
Output: a hunting dog is a dog that refers humans in hunting.

Negative Example 2 -
Input: in return , romania ceded three southern districts of bessarabia to russia and acquired dobruja.
Output: in return , romania ceded three southern districts of bessarabia to russia and acquired dobruja.

Now complete the following example -
Input: he was involved in litigation in 1889 with his former assistant charles a. borst , and the " great star-catalog case " peters v. borst went before the supreme court of new york.
Output: 



Output:
he was involved in legal action in 1889 with his ex-assistant charles a. borst , and the " great star-catalog case " peters v. borst went before the supreme court of new york.
he was involved in lawsuits in 1889 with his former assistant charles a. borst , and the " great star-catalog case , peters v. borst , went before the supreme court of new york.
he was wrapped up in prosecution in 1889 with his former assistant charles a. borst , and the " great star-catalog case " one that peters versus borst filed before the supreme court of new york.
he faced legal actions in 1889 with his old assistant charles a. borst , and the " great star-catalog case " peters v. borst went before the supreme court of new york.
he was involved in litigation in 1889 with his former assistant charles borst and the " great star-catalog case " peters v. borst went before the supreme court of new york.
he was involved in lawsuits in 1889 with his former assistant charles a. borst , and the " great star-catalog case " peters v. borst went before the supreme court of new york.
he participated in a lawsuit in 1889 with his prior assistant charles a. borst , and the " great stat-catalog case " peters v. borst before the supreme court of new york.