Lots-of-LoRAs/task359_casino_classification_negotiation_vouch_fair huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'thats the point as you need water so badly' 'Correct.. I do.. but if you're not willing to budge on this where you're still netting more overall value I understand - I'm bummed but I understand.' 'im contented with  what i have but im willing to trade as yu need more water so i need t make a profit'
Utterance: 'That's unfortunate then as instead of making a tiny bit less of a profit now you're not going to make any because you would rather give up the deal.  Also, if you do the math, you'll see that I'm actually benefiting you here - I understand, though.  I can put through the offer and hope you change your mind so we both benefit.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Thats a shame, i am sure you would like it if you give it a try, especially if you build a large fire 🙂' 'I was going to say, the fire would be probably one of the few things I would be interested in! I love being warm.' 'Well you can take all the firewood if it will help, would it be ok if i get all the food in return?'
Utterance: 'That works for me. How would you like to divide the water?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Thats great. Do you have any extra firewood you could trade by any chance?' 'Sure, I want to make sure I have one firewood at a minimum. ' 'What would you want in return?'
Utterance: 'I like to eat.  I think extra food is good.  Are you willing to let me have all three food packs? 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'we both have the same high value priority. what is number 2 for you? thanks' '🙂 Food' 'me 2 lol, what if you got 2 of the water and me 1 but then i could do 2 of the food and firewood and things would kind of even out with that arrangement.'
Utterance: 'Yes, that would be fair. How much of Firewood would you need?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am so excited to go camping!  I am planning a nice long walk in the woods to decompress from the hectic days of working.' 'I am too.  I've been thinking of this since COVID.  I hear we have some materials to share between the two of us.  What are you thinking?  For me, I am from the South so I get cold easily 🙂 so firewood is my main priority.'
Utterance: 'Perfect!  I'm a northerner, so the firewood is all yours!  I'll need lot's of water to keep hydrated after the hike, and I'll probably be pretty hungry too.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I could also use the extra food, so can we resolve it amicably?  Coin flip maybe?' 'That's a good idea.  I'll trust you to do the coin flip.  ' 'Sure.  🙂  I'll grab a coin.'
Utterance: 'Calling tails.  '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Interesting. Looks like we are in the same situation! 😮' 'I'd be willing to give you extra food if I could then get extra water and firewood. How about you Get 2 food, 1 water and 1 firewood?' 'That sounds almost fair. But I could possibly use 1 more firewood. What do you think?🙂🙂'
Utterance: 'Idk, you're already getting the extra food which would be important to me. I think my offer is very fair for both of us.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'How about this it think it will work out better for us and you snice you need fire wood too. You get 3 food and 2 firewood and and I get 3 water and 1 firewood. 🙂🙂' 'I really don't want to be without water, how about 2 water and 2 firewood for the 3 packages of food?' 'I just want to make sure I understand you I get 2 waters and 2 firewood and 0 food. '
Utterance: 'That's right. Since you would be getting food from your sister, while I am camping alone, you would be getting more food pretty soon. '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That doesn't sound like something I can agree to. Do you have any other ideas?' 'I can keep 2 of the firewood then and offer you 2 of the food. I'd take the water, 2 firewood and 1 water' 'I would do 3 firewood, 2 water and 2 food.'
Utterance: 'I can't do that. Truth is I need the firewood and I was hoping you didn't need it. I propose I keep 1 firewood, 3 waters and 2 food and you take the rest?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes