Lots-of-LoRAs/task359_casino_classification_negotiation_vouch_fair huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'The food seems to be #1 on my list , if we could find a way to divide this up between us I'd like that a lot 🙂' '😮 Food is #1 for me as well! What a pickle. My #2 is Firewood and my #3 is Water. We can split the Food and divided the Firewood and Food based on how important they are to us.' 'True we can , I'd be willing to just take one of the foods if you'd be willing to do that ? Then we can decide on the others '
Utterance: '🙂v it sound's like we're on the right track! I'll gladly take 2 Food. How would you feel about taking all of the Water, while I take all of the Firewood?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'i am already giving you all 3 food which i also need to eat' 'Would you be willing to trade a piece of firewood for an extra water bottle? That will save me some time from chopping down extra wood.' 'no, best i can offer is i get 3 firewood, 2 water and 1 food'
Utterance: 'No thanks.☹️'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: '2 food would be all that I need 🙂' 'I would need 2 food if you keep all the firewood. It would make it easier on me cooking wise since I'll have to look for wood' 'OK, that is fair.  So I would get 3 firewood, 1 water and 1 food and you would get 0 firewood, 2 food and 2 water.'
Utterance: 'I think that sounds fair to me'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am doing well. How about you?' 'I'm doing well. I'm trying to prepare for this camping trip. ' 'Me too.🙂'
Utterance: 'What are you looking for?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I do understand. That will work for me. ' 'Could you tell me about why you want water? ' 'I want water so I can keep hydrated during this camping trip. It's important for me to drink bottled water vs. getting water out at camping as it may flare up my disease. '
Utterance: 'Oh interesting! I have a device that allows me to drink pond/stream water by cleaning it, so water isn't as important to me.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am allergic to tea and coffee. I wonder if the smaller fire would be more quaint for everyone to sit around. ' 'It really wouldn't do the job that well at all.  You could always prepare hot cocoa or use your share of the food to make a warm stew.  I really do need at least the two firewood and a couple of food.  You can have all the water to make a hearty and hot stew to get your through the night, though.' 'I can't eat much anyway because of the health issues. You could have all of the food if I could get the extra firewood. That would still give you an extra firewood in addition to the basic supply and lots of extra food for your party. I'm sure they would love having some of the stew you mentioned.'
Utterance: 'Well, how about I take just the one extra firewood, plus all of the food, and one of the water so that I can make stew?  Would that work for you?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?' 'my item is food too.' 'Ok, other than food I could use some firewood. Maybe you could take 2 food and I could take 2 firewood?'
Utterance: 'sure, but i will get what then?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'you can have 3 food' 'Alright🙂 From what I understand, that means that you would take 3 firewood, and I would take 3 water and 3 food. Is this your understanding as well?' 'Can we split the water? You can have 2'
Utterance: 'I would prefer to have all 3 water, but I think I can make an exception since you have offered me all 3 food 🙂 Just to confirm, this means that you get 3 firewood and 1 water and I get 2 water and 3 food. Correct?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would like a little extra food for myself as well. Would you be willing to split the food 1 for me and 2 for you? ' 'I'd be willing to do that if you gave me some water and firewood in exchange' 'How about I keep 2 firewood, you take 1? What do you propose for the water?'
Utterance: '1 food for 1 firewood isn't a good trade for me. I would need at least 1 firewood and 1 water to trade for 1 food.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes