Lots-of-LoRAs/task359_casino_classification_negotiation_vouch_fair huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would need 2 out of 3 as well.' 'Interesting - you're essentially saying that you need the majority of two of the three items. Hmm...' 'Yes, thats all. I need 1/3 food, 2/3 water, and 2/3 firewood.'
Utterance: 'Still not convinced in any way that you need more items in total over me. Please clarify!'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi  - nice to meet you!  I hope we can work out a deal that is good for both of us.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey, Nice getting to interact with you. I would need additional packages of food as I'm camping with Family and my kids tend to get hungry often.' 'I also have a family I am camping with several small childern and my wife who is pregnant. I need plenty of firewood and water.'
Utterance: 'I get it, in that case and to be a fair deal. I will have 2 of food, 1 of water and firewood each.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'water, food then firewood. It's really hot so I need to make sure we are hydrated. We forgot a bag of supplies that had mostly food so we really could use food. It's hot so firewood isn't necessary. If anything we can get it from around or on a hike.' 'of course, we should help one another, we will figure something out i'm sure' 'Yes, I think we can. I'm thinking 3 water, 2 food and 1 firewood for myself? How does that sound to you?'
Utterance: 'i can't agree to that, the best i can do is 2water 1 food and 2 firewood for you, i have to have supplies too'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would be ok with that but i will need some water and food as Im a little out of shape' 'I can get you one package of water and food, will that work?' 'how am i supposed to stay alive with one package of food and water im fat lol'
Utterance: 'I don't think you that fat, your lipids will help you stay warm and full out there, haha'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I'm hoping we can come to a nice deal. 🙂 I'm most interested in firewood, because it always helps to have extra if your fire goes out.' 'That makes sense. I'm also interested in firewood, but have a great need for water due to the current weather. '
Utterance: 'That makes sense. How about we start out with I get 3 firewood, and you get 3 waters?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Food is also my highest priority, but firewood is also pretty close for me.' 'Would you be willing to take more firewood for less food?' 'Yes I think that sounds fair.'
Utterance: 'So if I take 2 foods and 1 firewood, you take 1 food and 2 firewood. What would be fair for water?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I cannot allow any water. As I mentioned we will be camping away from all bodies of water and cannot negotiate on that item. I need 3 water, or else I will need to cancel the trip. We might be able to negotiate on the food though.' 'I need to have at least a pack of water. How about 1 water, 3 firewood and 1 food?' 'Okay. I fear some of us may die of thirst, but I will give you 1 water. I can't agree to those terms though. I can give you 1 water 1 firewood and 2 food. That is my final offer though.'
Utterance: 'I am sorry, these terms are not favorable for me.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Output: Yes

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare' 'so what is the whole deal here? ' 'you get 3 firewood I get 3 waters and now food I will give you 1 if that is ok🙂'
Utterance: 'and I have to give you more food or not?'
Output: No

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Heck yes! I am excited. How about you?' 'I can't wait 🙂 Let's talk about these supplies. I've got hungry mouths to feed, Can I take the food and you can have half the firewood and all the water?' 'Hmm, I need food too. I am willing to split. I will give you 2 food since you claimed it first. Can I have 2 waters then?'
Utterance: 'That's fair, but I have wiggle room on the water, how about I take two food, two firewood and you take 3 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'You can take two firewood an i can get one. I really don't need much. of that. are you okay with that?' 'I am okay with that 🙂' 'okay an for as the water two for me an 2 for you right? are you sure?'
Utterance: 'Yes, as long as I can get two of the food. '
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'No I need more firewood' 'Okay, can I ask why the firewood is important for you? 🙂' 'You can find more wood in the forest but I'm going somewhere where there's not a loot of trees ☹️'
Utterance: 'That makes sense. What if you took 2 firewood in exchange for 1 additional food?'
Output: 


Answer: No