Lots-of-LoRAs/task357_casino_classification_negotiation_small_talk huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am a mother of two and I have two kids who need extra food and water' 'Okay, I need food and water too unfortunately. We can discuss this.🙂'
Utterance: 'Alright... my baby is on formula and needs water for her bottles. My son snacks all day and really needs food. Otherwise, he will starve and won't thrive'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi! how are you doing? I hope you are getting things packed for the camping.' 'Hi there! I am doing well. I am getting things ready and so excited! How are you doing?' 'I'm great! and almost done with packing. and exited about the camping too. Waiting to explore and learn during the trip.'
Utterance: 'That sounds great! What do you prefer with the additional packages for camping?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Yes, that's the plan. By the way, what do you need all that food for? You didn't say. I'm just curious.' 'I'm a bigger guy (6'3") so I eat a lot, especially after activities like hiking and kayaking. Same reason I want water really.' 'OK, that makes sense. I don't eat as much as you do, so it's only fair that you get most of the food. So I hope this deal will be fair for both of us and you'll walk away happy.'
Utterance: 'Yep, I'm happy, hope you are too! 🙂 I think we can enter the deal now.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I could go for 2 of the waters-I get dehydrated easily so must have those. Would you consider 2 waters and 1 firewood?🙂' 'I would be okay with that, if I can have extra of the food?' 'I really don't need a lot of food when camping so I would be happy to agree to that!🙂'
Utterance: 'Okay! Sounds fair! Where are you heading out to camp?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello. I would like to take the following items. (2) Firewood, (2) Water, and Food (2)' 'hello'
Utterance: 'I have brought my sons and a few of their friends so my group is larger. Will this deal work for you?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I was thinking about 2 units of firewood and 1 unit of food and one unit of water, what are you going to be needing this for?' 'I can do that. I am going camping in the fall with my family so we need a lot of food. We're camping by the lake so if you want I can give you an extra unit of water.' 'sure thats sounds fair, so that would leave you with two units of food one unit of firewood and one unit of water then?'
Utterance: 'That sounds fair to me. Have fun with the kiddo!'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello there! How are you today?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Okay, What did you thing about the camping trip?' 'I'm excited to go on it! I haven't gone it yet, that's why we're talking about supplies now.' 'Yeah, What did think about water? '
Utterance: 'I think water is great! I don't need very much for this trip, but water is delicious.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'I am running low on firewood. I need more to keep the fire going and cook food. '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I think that would work for us!' 'I am willing to make that deal.' 'Perfect! Let's plan on this between the two of us. Thank you for working so well with me. You made good points and I appreciate finding a proper solution. 🙂'
Utterance: 'Your welcome.  Have fun at the Puget Sound!🙂🙂'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey, that's great. Good to hear definitely. I am also looking forward to build some campfires and enjoy some s'mores!' 'Thats great! Would it be okay if I got 2 packages of firewood, and 1 each of the food and water?' 'I would've like to have 2 packages of firewood instead. How about I give you all the extra water packages?'
Utterance: 'Well for a compromise I will give you the 2 packages of firewood, if I got 1 firewood, 2 food, and 3 waters. 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That's not going to work for me at all, I would like 3 packages of water, 2 packages of food, and 1 package of firewood' 'That would leave me with no water. I would like 1 package of water, 2 packages of food, and 2 packages of firewood.' 'You'll have some water, this is for extra.  Would you take 2 packages of food and 3 packages of firewood in exchange for me getting 3 packages of water and 1 package of food?'
Utterance: 'Yes, I would.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'You're right. I do not plan on hiking so you need more food than me. If I am correct, would I get 3 firewood/1 food while you get 3 water/2 food?' 'That's what I could live with, yes.' 'We should be able to trade soon. I hope you have a great trip!'
Utterance: 'You too!  Great birdwatching this season.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'What are your preference what would you need most?'
Utterance: 'I need to keep the fire burning so i need firewood most. What about you?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Sounds like it'll be great for both of us.  Is there anything extra you need?' 'My favorite thing to do around the campfire is to sing songs.  I also like to do extra hiking as well.  I especially need firewood. ' 'Well, I could see fit to give you the extra firewood (If I can hear a few of your songs!) if you don't mind letting me take the water.'
Utterance: 'Hahaha, once you hear my singing you might hope the opposite.  I can do that with the firewood and water, but I really would prefer two of the remaining foods. '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello!  It will be so nice to go camping and spend some time in nature during this stressful time.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi there, how are you doing today?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes