Lots-of-LoRAs/task357_casino_classification_negotiation_small_talk huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Well, I really need water in case we get really thirsty from hiking. I also need firewood in case it gets colder and we need more. It would be cool to have more food added for dessert like s'mores, but it's not really necessary.' 'How about you take all the water and one of the firewoods, and I can have all the food and 2 of the firewoods' 'Let me think about it. What supplies do you need?'
Utterance: 'I won't be doing a lot of hiking, but will probably have a few campfires with food'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would appreciate that! How do you feel about water?  I would like at least one water.' 'I would be more than happy to give you an extra water as well for helping me with the food!' 'I would appreciate that! '
Utterance: 'ok awesome, do we  have a deal then? '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey! I sure am! The only thing is, I just learned that the canyon where I'm camping is going to be experiencing an unexpected heat wave over the next few days and I'm worried I might not be fully prepared. ☹️ What about you?' 'Same here! Last time my daughter got dehydrated and it made her sick!' 'That sounds awful! 😮 Where are you going to be camping?'
Utterance: 'In Arizona, so I know it'll be hot. How about you? '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would like all the firewood and two packages of water. You can have the rest.🙂' 'I want all of the water, two firewood, and one food.' 'Why do you need all the water and little food?'
Utterance: 'I need to stay hydrated because the weather is hot. I am trying to lose weight so I do not need much food.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hi there, i'm hoping we can come to an agreement on these extra items 🙂' 'Hello, I would really like more food for my trip. If I can have all the food, and firewood, you can have all the water'
Utterance: 'Oh, that won't really work for me.  I was hoping to get extra food and water for this trip since I need water to take medication and would love the food to plan a special meal.  I'd like say, 2 food, 3 water and 1 firewood'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi . How is your camping trip going?'
Utterance: 'The trip is great, how about you?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!' 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. ' 'What type of place are you thinking of going camping to? Like what is the climate/area? More desert or forest, etc?'
Utterance: 'Forest, for sure. Deserts have scorpions and tarantulas and I'm scared of those.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Great thank you. I am looking for primarily some firewood and food for my camping trip soon. ' 'I'm going camping too and also need food and wood, mostly food though' 'Okay I understand that! Is there a particular reason that you do not need much water?'
Utterance: 'I figure I could always get some at the stream 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'How are you enjoying the camping trip so far?'
Utterance: 'Hi. It’s great, but very cold here. How about you? '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'You have been most thoughtful during this negotiation I just want to say thank you for being so helpful.🙂' 'absolutly! You as well. So just to confirm. Me 2 food 1 water, 1 firewood. You, 1 food, 2 water, and 2 firewood? Sound good?' 'That looks like the correct arrangement, and again thank you and I wish you the best on your camping trip '
Utterance: 'sounds good! Looking forward to camping! maybe we'll run into each other on the trail! ;)'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I want to hike the mountains. I think swimming would be really relaxing ' 'Oh yes to relaxing! Can you tell I am a bit stressed? Actually, I am pregnant again and just want to practice taking things as they come. Hiking sounds great! Who is camping with you?' 'Congratulations! I am camping with my family which will be nice to spend time together '
Utterance: 'Oh, do enjoy! So you are in agreement about receiving 2 waters and firewoods, and one food?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'that sounds good to me, if you want to give me another food i would take it but ok if not ' 'I wish we could split packages in two!  How about if I give you another food and I keep two firewood?' 'that is ok, the original you stated will work, 2 food, 2 water and 1 firewood for you, and 2 firewood, 1 food and 1 water for me , i need to lose weight anyways '
Utterance: 'Well now that you mention it, I could lose a few pounds 😮'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what do you need the most for your camping trip?' 'ideally some firewood, it got soaked due to me being caught in the rain. what do you need the most?'
Utterance: 'I also need more firewood.  I thought I would be able to find enough around the campsite but I guess that rain got us both 😮'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Good afternoon, how are doing today? Let's get this thing going. What items are you most interested?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I do require at least one water, hiking is very physical demanding. Also there are 3 firewoods?' 'yes there are 3 firewoods.  Okay I understand about the water.  then how about 2 foods for 2 waters, and we somehow divide the three firewoods? 🙂' 'Could I possibly get 2 firewoods? Assuming Water is your high value item?'
Utterance: 'Sure, we can do that'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello.'
Output: 


Answer: No