Lots-of-LoRAs/task357_casino_classification_negotiation_small_talk huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'so if i were to  give you water what would i get ?' 'You'd be getting 1 water, 2 firewood, and 1 food' 'how much food are you willing to offer for water'
Utterance: 'We can go back to my original offer which was honestly more generous.. I get 2 Water, 1 Firewood, 1 food.. you get 1 water, 2 firewood, 2 food.. its honestly a better deal for you 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'food is necessary for all living beings. '
Utterance: 'I am traveling with a big group so we need more water.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'So I get 2 waters and 3 foods. and you get the rest?' 'I could use one food too. How am i going to survive without eating anything?' 'Okay So I get 2 waters and 2 foods and you get the rest?'
Utterance: 'Don't you think it is a fair deal?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hello friend i will like to sugest if i can have 2 packages of food and 1 firewood,you can have i food 2 firewood and 3 water,let me know what you think?'
Utterance: 'I don't think that's going to work for me, but I'm sure we can come up with an agreement.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'hi 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'great!' 'So we have agreed i get 2 foods and 3 waters and you get 1 food and 3 firewood? does that sound good?' 'I thought you just wanted 2 waters?'
Utterance: 'i either need 3 foods and 2 waters or 2 foods and 3 waters.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi! I'm going camping soon with my family at a lake! We're looking forward to it so much since we haven't been able to get out due to Covid. Are you going camping too?' 'Yes! I am also going with my family. My husband and I are essential workers but his hours all got cut. I got laid off from my job for part of the time.' 'oh man that sucks ☹️! I know Congress is currently debating all of the unemployment stuff too. Where do you plan to be going camping?'
Utterance: 'We didn't get unemployment or a stimulus check. ☹️ We are planning a trip to Missouri, Lake of the Ozarks. Our younger children have been cooped up so long we are hoping to let them get some sun and swimming in!'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I have more water than I need. How is your water supply?' 'I could use some more water as I get dehydrated easily. Since you have enough, I could give you and extra package of food for your water.' 'That sounds like a deal, what would you like to do as far as the firewood goes?'
Utterance: 'I really need to keep warm with my not so good sleeping bag.☹️ I would be willing to do this. I get two packages of firewood and three packages of water and I will give you two packages of food and one package of firewood. You have plenty of water so you will not miss that.. '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Are you bringing guest?' 'I am a campaign partner' 'Oh. What does that mean?'
Utterance: 'No I am the only person who come with you'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello 🙂 What do you need most??'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'but i can't give you 3 food and 3 firewood, thats 6 items vs the 3 water' 'Sure you can.  If you really want water the most, why would you care about the rest as much?😮' 'most does not mean i have to neglect the rest, anyways either a) I get 3 water, 2 food and 0 firewood or b) I get 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood'
Utterance: 'That is simply unacceptable.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'cooking, and sometimes I put firewood in the fireplace to keep me warm' 'Those are good uses. I think can make a deal. Three firewood for you and I get three water and three food?' 'that's right'
Utterance: 'Alright a deal it's, thank you for cooperating '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would like water more than food. ' 'How many wood do you think you need?' 'I would like 2 of the firewood. What do you think? '
Utterance: 'I don't need wood as I am usually warm so I think we can work out a deal. I like to have more water and I usually get thirsty.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Ok I am going to say this once before we both get nothing, I will get 3 Firewood, 2 Water and 0 Food. You will get 3 Food, 1 Water' 'i am also need firewood friend because we are going to snow fall place so i need at least 1 pack of fire wood ' 'wait friend  i need fire wood must. how we all are live in the place please understand my situation '
Utterance: 'If you want the firewood then im getting another water'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Unfortunately, I need the firewood to make campfires. Since you are planning to cook a romantic camping meal, don't you need food?' 'well then give me 1 firewood 2 food and 2 water?, then you have 2 firewood so your boy can practice' 'What I don't understand is that you requested I respond quicker to your messages, yet you do not respond with much detail or discussion.'
Utterance: 'i want my share as well I give you 2 wood 2 water  and one food '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hai friend I am fine what about you?me and my team going to trip on some snow fall place I want some help from you.' 'Well, let's negogiate friend! What interests you the most?' 'Okay. I need 3 package of fire woof and 2 pack of food and 2 pack of water.'
Utterance: 'Hmm ☹️ That does not leave me with much'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Ok. I will have 2 water, 2 firewood and 1 food. Am I correct?' 'no, I can give you 2 water and one food if you give me 2 firewood' 'Ok. Can you give atleast two foods for me😮☹️'
Utterance: 'okay. so 2 water and 2 food for you and you will give me 2 firewood'
Output: 


Answer: No