Lots-of-LoRAs/task357_casino_classification_negotiation_small_talk huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'HI! Are you excited to go on this trip?' 'I am' 'Me too! Is this your first time?'
Utterance: 'I have been camping before, but it has been a while. You?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I think food, water, and firewood are all going to be fairly important.' 'I agree. I have diabetes, so water and food are super important to me. My diabetes makes me super thirsty and I have to make sure I keep my blood sugar under control with certain foods ☹️' 'I can definitely relate to that, I have family members with type 2 so I know how bad that can get'
Utterance: 'Yes definitely! It is a pain for sure, but I love camping so I still want to go! I just have to make sure I have all the supplies I need. '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'i need food and water to survive, can I have 3 food, 2 water and 0 firewood?' 'No, I definitely need more water than that for my hikes,  ' 'can i get 3 food, 1 water and 0 firewood then?'
Utterance: 'I think that will work for me.  '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Good morning! Are you excited to go camping this weekend?'
Utterance: 'Yes, how about you! We are headed to Joshua Tree NP to do some rock climbing and hiking. '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am about to go on a charity event with a kid from the make a wish foundation, I would like to get some firewood and maybe some food for his trip so he wont be cold and hungry at least.' 'I can give you 2 units of food. How much firewood do you need?' 'I was thinking about 2 units of firewood and 1 unit of food and one unit of water, what are you going to be needing this for?'
Utterance: 'I can do that. I am going camping in the fall with my family so we need a lot of food. We're camping by the lake so if you want I can give you an extra unit of water.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hmm. :( How about I get 2 food and you get 1? That way it'll be slightly more equal' 'Since you are getting two firewoods I need two foods Let's deal on this.' 'Ok. Then how about I get two waters. I need the food, too. I got four mouths to feed. '
Utterance: 'You can have 1 water.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am so excited to go camping!  I am planning a nice long walk in the woods to decompress from the hectic days of working.'
Utterance: 'I am too.  I've been thinking of this since COVID.  I hear we have some materials to share between the two of us.  What are you thinking?  For me, I am from the South so I get cold easily 🙂 so firewood is my main priority.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I recently bought two new puppies, and they are coming on the trip. I could really use the extra water for them!' 'Awww. That sounds reasonable to me. I'm hoping to have a birthday dinner for my dad on the trip, so I'd appreciate some more food and a little more firewood.' 'Happy birthday to your dad!! You can have all of the food if I can have all of the water. 🙂'
Utterance: 'That'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That wouldn't work for me, I will be going hiking during camping, so I need all of the water I can get' 'Well then maybe we can just do a trade, the water to you and the food to me.  And if I got two of the firewood, I'd have plenty of time to just boil and purify some riverwater instead' 'That does not seem entirely fare but I need more water so I will take this deal'
Utterance: 'It's honestly not that fair to me either, but sometimes we just end up with slightly conflicting priorities in life.  🙂  I think making the best of the situation is the way forward.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'yes i can agree to that, thats a good compromise' 'yay, thank you so much! to very I am getting 3 waters, 0 firewood, and 1 food?' 'i will be getting 3 firewood, 0 water and 2 food'
Utterance: 'perfect! submitting deal, thank you so much for understanding'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi buddy. How you doing today? 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am running low on firewood. I need more to keep the fire going and cook food. ' 'Yeah I need firewood too. It's only 50 degrees at night on the mountain, even in the summer.' 'How would you feel about giving me some firewood for food?'
Utterance: 'Maybe, I need food too but I want firewood the most.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Okay, that makes sense. I really need water. I am willing to trade you all 3 of the food if you will give me all of the water. What do you think?' 'I think that sounds okay but I need at least one water please?' 'If you want one water you can only have 2 foods. Do you really need the water? It sounds like food is a much more important item to you🙂'
Utterance: 'Ok I will take 3 food and 3 firewood and you can all 3 water? 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'im only require so much as im one person. you will double that' 'hey buddy I hope we both end up with a good deal🙂'
Utterance: 'i think its fair, do you, i think anything extra at this point in time is better than having nothing'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'hello, I need plenty of food, I have lots of friends we are camping together.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Unfortunately i need the firewood. My body has trouble maintaining heat. I need as much as i can get ☹️' 'Okay, well if you need water and firewood, that only leaves food. If you can part with extra food, here's what I'm proposing' 'Yes you can definitely have all the food. Maybe 2 firewoods and 2 waters for me?'
Utterance: 'Sounds good to me.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Great!  So looks like all the water goes to you.  I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood.  ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK.  I think that will work out for me.  You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food.  I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Since you would also like firewood, I propose 2 firewood, 2 water to me, and you get 1 wood, 1 water, and all the food to make up for it.' 'Okay I can agree to that deal.🙂' 'That's fantastic, I'm glad we came to something we both agree with'
Utterance: 'Me too. I hope you have a wonderful camping trip.🙂'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello! I am looking forward to the camping trip but could use a few more supplies!' 'hello, me too, i guess we can share' 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?'
Utterance: 'my item is food too.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I can do without extra water as long as I have food and firewood to purify water I find.  It might be better for you to have a reliable supply though.' 'That totally makes sense! I actually am good on firewood thankfully, I got some from a person selling it from their yard a little bit ago.' 'I would have been able to bring more with me by getting some from my parents, but my father decided he wanted to get rid of what he had left and so has been enjoying his fire pit a lot lately.'
Utterance: 'Oh I have always wanted a firepit! I totally understand. If you'd like you can have all 3 of the firewood supply stash to get you started.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am good. I am pretty excited for the trip this weekend. what about you?' 'Very excited. It will be fun.' 'Yes, Hopefully the weather holds up. So I was thinking, i am bringning my two kids along with me, and they will need food, so I was thinking i could take the three foods, and either one of the firewood or water, up to you.'
Utterance: 'I would also like a little extra food for my kids. Maybe we can split it somehow?'
Output: 


Answer: No