Lots-of-LoRAs/task355_casino_classification_negotiation_other_need huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'I'd like to have 2 extra packages of water and firewood.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Most needed is both food and water. I guess food is my highest priority .🙂' 'Ok perfect, the item I need the most is water because I need to hydrate.  What do you think if I give you 2 food and I keep 2 of water. ' 'Ii understand , the problem  is ctheere is 3 of us. What if  we have 2 food and 2 water and you have 2 firewood ?🙂'
Utterance: 'The object I need the most is WATER, so I cannot give you 2, I am giving you 2 FOOD since it is what you most need. Remember that we must both be satisfied for this to work🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello!' 'Hey there. How are you doing?' 'Great! What do you look for most when camping?'
Utterance: 'Definitely water. The weather is so damn hot.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Howdy! Looking for firewood, water and food--really trying to get 3 packages of each, want to make sure my family has enough supplies for camping. I don't want anyone injured or our vacation cut short.' 'Ok.  I am looking to have one package of water and on package of food.'
Utterance: 'Is there any way you could let us have 3 packages of each? I'm just trying to make sure my family has enough, we don't get to get out in the woods that often. It's really important to us.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I was thinking maybe I could have a majority of the fire food and you can have a majority of the water and food. ' 'What exactly do you mean by majority? As in everything ?' 'I was more thinking 2 Firewood for me , 1 food and 1 water? The rest would be yours.'
Utterance: 'That is a promising bargain but I want at least 2 firewood, it makes for a fun time for my group.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am doing quite good. I enjoy camping. I however did not bring enough food.' 'Ok I'm sure we can work it out because I know I need extra water and firewood. Do you have any ideas on how to divvy up the extra supplies?' 'I would need some firewood as well, as I need it to cook the food. I was thinking maybe you can have all the water and I have all the food.'
Utterance: 'All the food is too much, I would need at least one package of the food for my group. I was thinking you could have 2 of the food packages and I have 1, then I get all the water and the majority of the firewood. That leaves you with 2 of the high priority food packages and a package of firewood to cook the food.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That's amazing!!!  So here is the deal...I'll give you the 2 firewood packages so you can sleep under the stars tonight.  In return I'll have to keep 2 water packages and 2 food packages since I won't be able to cook all of this fish and I still have a family to feed.  ' 'I'm glad you understand my problem. But I really need those 3 firewood packages. I'd be happy to give you 2 water packages and all the food in exchange.' 'Initially you were willing to take the 2 packages of firewood. If you have all three I won't be able to cook any of this fish and it will all go to waste. ☹️'
Utterance: 'Didn't you bring any firewood at all with you?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I get tired to easy so I probably won't be much fun at a bonfire ☹️. I really do appreciate the offer though. I would think the extra food would do you more good for your party. ' 'The extra food would be appreciated.  How about if I take just two each of the firewood and food, and you can have the remainder, plus all of the water?' 'I am just concerned that only 1 firewood might make it so I'm too cold to function. '
Utterance: 'If you boil the water above the fire, it will provide additional heat over time.  You would also be able to make tea, which would warm you up from the inside as well, better than any fire would.  That would probably be most beneficial to you.  I really do need the 2 firewood if there's any chance of making a bonfire for my party.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes