Lots-of-LoRAs/task355_casino_classification_negotiation_other_need huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi! I like to hike so I really need more water. Could I take 2 packages of water and 1 of food and 2 of firewood?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to share everything.' 'Awesome.  I would prefer getting 3 of my highest priority item though, and maybe you could get 3 of your highest priority item?' 'I  wood really like the firewood as I am afraid of the dark and would like my fire to last all night. '
Utterance: 'Oh that makes total sense.  I need the food so badly since I am bringing my family with me and they are one hungry bunch aha.  Would you be amenable to me having 3 food packets and you having 3 firewood packets?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'ohh that's would be really difficult.However we can still sort things out' 'That is great to hear!🙂 How about you take 2 food, 2 water and 0 firewood? What do you think?' 'uhm.how about i have 3 water 2 foods and zero firewood?'
Utterance: 'Are you willing to budge on one water for me? I have 5 people in my group and they really could use one package of water. It is hot out nowadays. '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I have a big party with varying degrees of health and I'm going to need every bit of firewood and food I can get my hands on!  🙂' 'hi, we may be in luck then, i really would like water as i enjoy walking and hiking, i will require some firewood though so i can roast some s'mores' 'How many people are in your camping party?'
Utterance: 'i have 6, and 2 more could be joining us to make 8 '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I'll tell you what I'm willing to do.. I can't really budge on the water.. BUT.. I could do something where I take 2 water, and only one firewood, but two food.. does that work for you?' 'so if i were to  give you water what would i get ?' 'You'd be getting 1 water, 2 firewood, and 1 food'
Utterance: 'how much food are you willing to offer for water'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That sounds like a blast.   I would like to propose that you take 2 waters and 1 firewood and I'll take 2 firewoods and 1 water for our respective trips.  Does that work for you?' 'Yes, we are all looking forward to it. Thanks for being amenable and trying to make this work. That might be okay, but could we take take the 3 packages of food? Since we won't be doing as big of a bonfire, I am sure we'll hike more or swim and need the extra energy' 'I was hoping to take at least some of the food with me.  As you know, those teenagers seem to hungry ALL the time.  It's like feeding fuel into a bottomless pit.  So I'm definitely going to need some of the food for my trip as well.'
Utterance: 'Hm okay. Would 1 packet of food be sufficient? I know they are growing but my friends are ex football players and can eat 3x the normal person'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Food doesn't prevent cold. Thank you for giving me all the food but I need 1 wood to cook the additional food. You still end up with more items in the  end  ' 'Okay I accept the deal.' '🙂awesome thank you'
Utterance: 'Sorry, I thought that I can manage with two woods, but the temperature is very loo and many people need to save their life.  Please change the deal and provide us 3 wood.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I don't like food. my stomach is always full. I only drink water since im thirsty most of the time.' 'yeah i can understand buddy, but the fact is we can share some items. you are not getting food packages and getting packages alone which you preferred. Try some food packages too' 'Okay I agree what about this deal. I get 2 water, 1 firewood ,and 1 food package.'
Utterance: 'sounds good. but how much firewood will i get ? because i don't need it much'
Output: 


Answer: No