Lots-of-LoRAs/task355_casino_classification_negotiation_other_need huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'O wow.☹️ I'm sorry to here that. I can give you all my firewood and a food if you can give me all your water. ' 'can you add one more food to it if that's ok?' 'I really need that extra food for me and my bother. we have one to spare'
Utterance: 'so what is the whole deal here? '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey, I was thinking that I could take all of the food items, and 2 of the firewood items. My friend has low blood sugar and they need the food in case they crash, and the warmth of the fire to maintain at evening.' 'Water is my highest priority, what is yours? Is it food?'
Utterance: 'Yes, food is my highest. It's necessary for my friend to keep extra around just in case he crashes. Why is water your highest priority?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'okay🙂 is it cold so you want firewood?' 'Yes, I get cold easy. Thanks a lot!' 'sure, i have a lot of people coming thats why i need food'
Utterance: 'No problems with that. I am glad we could make a deal. To summarize, you will have 3 of food and 1 of firewood while I will have 3 of water and 2 of Firewood.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey! I'm doing great, how are you? ' 'Looking forward to doing some serious hiking with the family.  bad luck on the way here we flew in and the airline loss or bags with some of our supplies and sleeping bags.☹️' 'oh nooo, that's terrible. do they know where they left them?'
Utterance: 'I think they went to Chicago.  I really needing replace our lost water and sleeping bags.  I see there are some extra supplies to share.  I could really use the water and firwood.  🙂'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I can give you two of the packages if you're willing to give me all 3 of the firewood. I left mine out in the rain a couple of nights ago so its all ruined.' 'If I will give 2 firewood for you and I will take all the food package with 2 water.' 'I need all 3 firewood! But I'm willing to discuss food with you. I have a lot of that.'
Utterance: 'Wow. Thank you. Ok. Then I will give you all 3 firewood, however I need all food package with water.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I don't care about the firewood, but I would like food and water the most.' 'you can take water if i get all the firewood and some food' 'I'll take all the water, you can take all the firewood. What would be fair for the food?'
Utterance: 'we have to split it somehow'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Firewood is definitely important as well! Last time I went camping we ran out pretty fast, so I want to be extra prepared. 🙂' 'Oh no! I can see why that would be extra important to you! I will give you two of the firewood for two of the water' 'That sounds good to me! I think since water is pretty important on a camping trip (especially with a baby!), and since you are getting 2 extra packages of water, may I ask that I get 2 of the food packages? I have 2 (always hungry) preschoolers joining us haha! 🙂 I can never seem to keep them full'
Utterance: 'I wish there was a way to split that third package of food in half because I am so worried for my husband's diabetes, he constantly needs food as well ☹️'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Okay. then I'll choose 2 food, 2 firewood and 1 water' 'You want two food or you're allowing me to have 2 food?' 'I want 2 food'
Utterance: 'My kids need the food. If you allow me to have two food I'll give you all the firewood'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'i am great, super excited about camping as well, are there any supplies that you really need?' 'i really need water and food. we did not get enough of those.' 'Those are my priorities as well, how about you get all the food and two firewoods, and i get all the water and one firewood, does that sound fair?'
Utterance: 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.'
Output: 


Answer: No