Lots-of-LoRAs/task355_casino_classification_negotiation_other_need huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Yes, does that work for you.  I could give you 1 water and 2 foods as I really need the water for my hike.  I tend to overheat easily. ' 'You are flipping it around. I can't give you 2 water and 2 firewood as that wouldn't really be fair ' 'Okay, how about if I give you 3 foods and you give me the 2 firewoods and 2 waters?'
Utterance: 'THanks, but I really need the water. I thought you would enjoy the food with so  many guests in your campsite. Is that a possibility?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'I need more food since I have a huge family. Can you give me all food i give you all water?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.' 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.' 'Me too. There is little natural sources where I'm going. '
Utterance: 'I'm not familiar with my surroundings. None of us going have ever been to this spot.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I tell you what if we trade 3 food for 3 waters! I think that would be fair snice you said you need some food and snice I need some water. 🙂' 'Well, I do have some food but if I trade you all 3 packages of water, I won't have any at all. How about 2 packages of water, so we each have 1 package, including your sister?' 'How about this it think it will work out better for us and you snice you need fire wood too. You get 3 food and 2 firewood and and I get 3 water and 1 firewood. 🙂🙂'
Utterance: 'I really don't want to be without water, how about 2 water and 2 firewood for the 3 packages of food?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi, this is my first time camping and I want to make sure I have enough stuff.  I would like three food, three firewood, and two water.  What do you think?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That does not seem entirely fare but I need more water so I will take this deal' 'It's honestly not that fair to me either, but sometimes we just end up with slightly conflicting priorities in life.  🙂  I think making the best of the situation is the way forward.' 'Yeah, That's true,🙂, so do we have a deal?'
Utterance: 'Yup, the food to me, the water to you, and 2 of the firewood to me, 1 to you is as I understand it!'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, I'm excited for our camping trip!' 'Hey buddy, yes I'm so pumped for it.'
Utterance: 'Okay so I'm planning this super cool backpacking expedition up the waterfall but I'm going to need all the additional water and food for everyone.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I too have children who eat like adults they too can't able to withstand hunger so you please show some mercy and give me 3 food packages and take all water and firewood' 'No I need extra food too. I cannot let my children starve and you cant let your children go thirsty. So if you cant agree to share the food i will walk away from the deal.' 'There is no point in walk away. This deal should be done mutually and beneficial for both. So its better I will take 2 food packages, you can take 1 food package, 2 water and 3 fire wood .Hope this will definitely work for you.'
Utterance: 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages and 1 water. How about we do it like this... You take 1 food package, 2 waters and 2 firewoods. Does that work for you?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.'
Utterance: 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger'
Output: 


Answer: Yes