Lots-of-LoRAs/task355_casino_classification_negotiation_other_need huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Water was my high priority and food was your's, so I think we already split the difference there. ' 'Okay, so how do you propose splitting the firewood?' 'Can we split a bundle, in the real world that would be cool.  '
Utterance: 'I wish we could. I would be down for that. 🙂 That seems the most fair to me. How about you enter the trade deal on your end?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'no that won't work.  I will give you 3 food and 1 water.  I will take 3 wood and 2 waters.' 'I did not know you wanted water. Ok, that's great so I will take all 3 extra packages of food.As for the water I would like 2 waters because my dog is coming along with us for our trip and extra water for him will be needed.' 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.'
Utterance: 'Well, if we can't settle on an agreement i'm going to walk away. We agreed I will get all 3 extra packages of the food but I still wish for the 2 extra wood and 2 extra waters'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Like i said food is my top priority so i will not do well with less than 2.' 'Then you get two food and no firewood here.😮' 'You mean you can't let up one firewood for me?'
Utterance: 'Not this time, I really need all the firewood and food is a large need for my family of 8. We need the firewood to cook all our meals from the animals we hunt since we are short on food.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'I have a big party with varying degrees of health and I'm going to need every bit of firewood and food I can get my hands on!  🙂'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello' 'Hi can I ask what camping supplies you most need?' 'I would like the 3 food packages because my sister forgot to pack any food items for the trip. You can have all the water and firewood. '
Utterance: 'Oh no!  I have my daughter with me and she really likes to eat.  I was hoping to get at least some of the food.  Do you need water or firewood more?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Glad to hear because I really need firewood and food. What do you propose?' 'I can give you 3 packages of food but I really need the additional firewood.' 'I like that. How about 3 water for you and 1 firewood?'
Utterance: 'I can give 3 packages of food and 1 water.  '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That doesn't seem very fair ☹️. That would be 3 food and 1 firewood for 2 water. That is 4 items exchange for 2.' 'Ok what if I throw in 3 waters in exchange for 3 food and 1 firewood? So it is a 4 - 3 exchange instead.' 'Actually I changed my mind , lets just do 3 food for 3 water?'
Utterance: 'Well that is a little promising but I would really like some firewood as it makes me nice and warm and keeps the camp going 🙂.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'okay fine. now it is suitable for both of us' 'That sounds good.  Thank you for being fair and agreeable.  ' 'thank you for your time'
Utterance: 'Thank you as well. 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get alot of water as well, would you be ok with me getting two waters and three firewoods if you get all the food and one water?' 'Hmm, that's not favorable for me going by the volume of items left in my arsenal. Water is more of a higher priority than food. So, I would exchange 1 pack of food for an additional water' 'So that way you would get two waters and two foods? Those are my priorities as well but i would be ok with it since that way i would get five items and you would get only four.'
Utterance: 'Those are your priorities?? Then that's not fair for you. Then I take 2 water, 1 firewood and 1 food. This is the lowest I can offer'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am doing okay but am in need of some supplies. What about you?' 'Same here. My kids are really looking forward to this. What is most important to you?' 'Firewood! I need it to cook my food and also to stay warm. What about you?'
Utterance: 'That is the same for me as well. My kids were really looking forward to making s'mores and telling stories by the campfire. That's all they've been talking about'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hi! How are you doing today?' 'I'm fine. And yourself?' 'Pretty good. I'm really excited about going camping though!'
Utterance: 'Me too. I haven't been camping for several years. '
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I hope we can work together to get an offer that benefits both of us.🙂'
Utterance: 'I agree! Nice to meet you... I have two boys who always eat! Any chance I canget 2 food?'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I'm good to give up firewood for more water and food.' 'Thanks!  You can have all the extra food. My pockets are jammed full of munchies.  But water is something it seems we both really need.' 'I'll do 2 water and 0 firewood, 3 food.'
Utterance: 'Hey, good news!  My site is next to a vending machine.  Mostly Ding Dongs and Ho Hos, but there is a bottle of water in there.  I can go with your recommendations.  I'll take three firewood, 1 water, and no food.  But I may be by your site later to borrow toilet paper. OK?'
Output: 


Answer: No