Lots-of-LoRAs/task354_casino_classification_negotiation_no_need huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Farther. I'm going so far north that we'll be passing over the north pole and keep going into Siberia.' 'That sound cool, I mean cold. 🙂' 'It will be. And I'm grateful that you recognize the need! Will you do me a solid by permitting me to have these provisions?'
Utterance: 'I can give you 3 firewood, but only 1 food and no water.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to pick up a lot of wood. It has rained around here and the wood is soggy in the forest.' 'Which item do you prefer the most?' 'I know how to filter water so you can have all of the water. I would like as much firewood as possible.'
Utterance: 'me too. I don't care about water since we are camping near a river.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?' 'Hey there, I'm doing well! I'm excited to choose camping supplies.'
Utterance: 'Me too🙂. I packed a lot of food so I have plenty to spare'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hello'
Utterance: 'hi'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'how about i get 1 water, 2 food, and 2 firewood since I'll be here so long? because of my leg i likely won't be able to leave anytime soon' 'What about I give you more food in exchange for you giving me more water? I could give you 2 food and you give me an extra water?' 'unfortunately that doesnt work for me. i am afraid i will not be able to discuss this any further my final offer is i get 2water 2food and 1wood'
Utterance: 'can we meet in the middle? if we cannot come to an agreement we both get nothing and we both lose. i am in dire need of the water to keep my leg from having to be amputated. i have children at home i take care of and i can't live without my leg'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'No problem.🙂  So I will keep the 3 packages of water and, since I am giving you all 3 packages of the firewood I will take back the 1 food package and keep all 3 of the food packages.' 'I would still like at least 1 package of the food please.  There has been a lot of rain in the area, but I think some poisonous mushrooms maybe prevalent in the area, so to be extra cautious I would like a little spare food on hand.' 'You don't have to eat the poison mushrooms. You can catch some fish from the river or hunt for small animals.  You have all of the firewood so cooking the food should not be a problem.'
Utterance: 'I won't willingly eat the poisonous mushrooms, but it could be very hard to tell the difference from safe and toxic ones.  I understand you will be staying in your area for a few extra days, but can you catch fish or hunt for small animals in your area too?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I have a medical condition that causes my veins to close up when I get too cold. I will thus need the 3 firewood.' '☹️Oh, that sounds awful. Are you sure you need all three packages of firewood?'
Utterance: 'I might be able to get by with just two... I'm on a diet though, so I don't need as much food.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would also like a little extra food for my kids. Maybe we can split it somehow?' 'Ok, I am willing to give you one food, in exchange for two firewoods, that would mean you get 3 waters, 1 food and 1 firewood. you get 5 items, while i get 4.' 'If I only get 1 food, than I would like 2 firewood. So you get 2 food, 1 firewood, and 1 water.'
Utterance: 'No i do not need water, as i am camping near a potable stream. I would like 2 firewood. It is only fair that i get two firewood, since you are getting more supplies (5), i think i should be able to choose what 4 i should get.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That's so nice of you! I would be delighted to have some great meals during this camping vacay. 🙂🙂' 'I have managed to bring pouches of some of my favorite seasonings.  I'm hoping to find some great wild mushrooms in the forest too.  ' 'I'm a big fan of well seasoned food and mushrooms! Mmm.. 🙂 Do you think it would also be alright for me to have 2 of the 3 waters since I will be hiking a lot?'
Utterance: 'That would be fine.  I was hoping to have 2 but since I am only walking and you are doing more heavy duty hiking, you take them.  Agreed?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Welcome to the camping trip Dude!' 'Welcome! I'm really concerned about our water supply, we are desperately low. We don't have much food, a few protein bars. how are things looking your way?' 'I haven't got too the site yet but I am almost there.  I can't wait to finally relax!  I have been going nonstop for days.  Good idea to check supplies!'
Utterance: 'We're nearly there and just realized that we must have missed picking up some of our stuff before leaving.'
Output: 


Answer: No