Lots-of-LoRAs/task354_casino_classification_negotiation_no_need huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'My kids really eat a lot. But then yours probably to as well!' 'Can we agree on 2 food for me and 1 water and firewood' 'How about if I give you 2 water and I take the 2 food?'
Utterance: 'I don't need water I have plenty of water. You said you needed wood to boil the waters. So I offered more wood.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Ok.  I am worried about animals and bugs so I would prefer 2 firewood.  But I am happy with the 3 food🙂' 'Ok, how about we shift a bit as I hear you on the bugs and animals.  I think I can get by with one firewood and use extra covers and meds.  But, will need plenty of water and some food.  How about I take 1 firewood, 2 water and 2 food.' 'Ok, although I was thinking that I could probably find some firewood, but would prefer more water so I don't get dehydrated and can use it to wash and cook.  How about I take 1 firewood, 2 water, and 1 food'
Utterance: 'Good thought on finding your own firewood.  I appreciate the offer of 2 firewood.  I can cut back on water for washing/cooking.  So how about I take 2 firewood, 1 water and 2 food'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'But these are only additional packages☹️' 'I get that and understand completely. I have a large number of mouths to feed making the food a necessity or all the firewood to cook whatever we hunt. How many you have?' 'I have three.'
Utterance: 'I have 8. That is 5 more people to feed for 3 meals per day....'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Ya definitely. I need food and firewood most. What do you need?' 'I believe that we have the same priorities.  So we have a large family including children that need the food, but my wife also needs firewood due to poor circulation.  She is susceptible to frost bite and limb loss' 'Okay so how about one of us takes 2 of the food and 1 of the firewood, and the other takes 1 of the food and 2 of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'that sounds fair.  I will take 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water, thus giving you 2 food, 1 firewood, 1 water'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey there!' 'Hi! What are your preferences? ' 'Food is of the highest preference for me! I am a diabetic and always need to be able to eat if I'm experiencing a low! How about you?'
Utterance: 'Food is also my highest preference, followed by firewood, with water being the lowest. I don't have a medical condition that needs food so I can give you 2 units if I can have 1?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello, how are you doing today?'
Utterance: 'I am doing well, how about you? It is another hot July day.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi, it is nice to be going camping. I do not have a very good sleeping bag and I can get cold at night. It would be nice to have extra firewood. I dont eat much so I do not need much extra food. Would you be willing to give me two packages of firewood for a package of food?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hmm, ok, thats pretty fair. I do have a larger group going as well, so would it be okay if I got 2 extra food then?' 'I think that will work. ' 'Ok, great!🙂 Just to recap, I'll get 2 water, 0 firewood, 2 food, you get the rest.'
Utterance: 'That's right.  Thanks for making this part of planning for the trip easy'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'What do you need it for?' 'I would like some extra food in case I get hungry.' 'Okay that sounds ok, I can do without the food. I also need two packages of water because it will be very hot out.'
Utterance: 'I can give you 2 packages of water.  I think there is plenty of water, so I do not need extra water.🙂'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hi, how are you?' 'Great, how are you?' 'Pretty good, planning my camping trip, checking on supplies.'
Utterance: 'Here too, looks like the weather has changed for us. We won't have enough water to last as we forgot it. Food, we have some snacks, but not enough to get by for our trip. I'm not overly concerned about firewood since it's so hot. But I'm really concerned about water.'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Hello'
Utterance: 'Hello! How are you doing today?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️' 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
Utterance: 'No. Because I brought a water purifier but don't plan on hunting or fishing. So I'd be willing to give up all the water but I want 2 of the food.'
Output: No

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That sounds reasonable. I don't particularly need the food because I see that as more of a luxury but I could really use some more water. It's supposed to get really really hot on the weekend. 😮' 'I hear that. What do you think of if I take 3 of the food supplies and you can have two waters? ' 'That sounds like a fair compromise. I can get food by hunting animals, old school style. That would give you 4 total items. In that case it's only fair if I take all 3 of the firewood. 4 for me and 4 for you sounds like a good deal to me. 🙂'
Utterance: 'That sounds fair to me! I don't know the first thing about hunting so that would be a relief on me. We took a bunch of blankets so we'll be good on firewood.  🙂'
Output: 


Answer: Yes