Lots-of-LoRAs/task353_casino_classification_negotiation_elicit_pref huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'It took a while to load but good.' 'Let's talk about how we can split the camping supplies' 'Ok I think we should split evenly'
Utterance: 'yes we should come to a fair deal, what are your priority items?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi  I have an extra guest that will be camping with me and was wondering if you had an extra food package that you could spare?' 'I don't have much food, but you can take one package and I can take two? ' 'thanks  that would be great!  I also need an extra package of firewood, I will probably need it cooking.  Do you have a spare package of it as well?'
Utterance: 'I don't need much firework, so you could have two packages. Could I take all of the water so I can wash my clothes? '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I really appreciate that. Do you think you will be okay with just 1 water since you have health issues?' 'That would be very nice, but I worry about you not having enough on the trail.  Dehydration would not be good.  I am pretty sure I can ration my supply to make it last.  🙂' 'You're a good friend! I'm excited to embark on this adventure! 🙂🙂🙂'
Utterance: 'Me too!  So let me clarify:  I will take 2 firewood, 1 water and 1 food.  You will take 1 Firewood, 2 water and 2 food.  Is that right.  🙂🙂🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'The food seems to be #1 on my list , if we could find a way to divide this up between us I'd like that a lot 🙂' '😮 Food is #1 for me as well! What a pickle. My #2 is Firewood and my #3 is Water. We can split the Food and divided the Firewood and Food based on how important they are to us.' 'True we can , I'd be willing to just take one of the foods if you'd be willing to do that ? Then we can decide on the others '
Utterance: '🙂v it sound's like we're on the right track! I'll gladly take 2 Food. How would you feel about taking all of the Water, while I take all of the Firewood?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That makes sense. How about we start out with I get 3 firewood, and you get 3 waters?' 'Great idea, that works for me. 🙂' 'Okay, let's do that, and then split the food. Since there are only 3, do you want to flip a coin to see who gets 2 of those?'
Utterance: 'That sounds fair, how much food do you feel you need? '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'good here, I will need 3 water as I need it to survive' 'I need water as well.  I require it for subsistence' 'how many water you need?'
Utterance: 'In a perfect world, all the water 🙂'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi there, I hope I would be able to leave with some needed items'
Utterance: 'Likewise! What are you in need of'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I was hoping to get some extra food just in case my kids get hungry. Would you be ok if I took 2 food and you could have 2 of the rest?' 'yes child is not hoping. u hive me a all extra food to the child.' 'You're good with the extra water and firewood?'
Utterance: 'yes extra water and firewood of my self.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'What are your preference what would you need most?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes