Lots-of-LoRAs/task353_casino_classification_negotiation_elicit_pref huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I would be interested in firewood.  Can I ask you, what are your primary concerns on this trip?' 'My primary concerns are staying hydrated, I have been feeling sick and throwing up from being so high up in the mountains. ' 'Oh, so sorry to hear that.  I can understand why water would be important to you.  I am worried about being too cold at night. My sleeping bag is not rated well for cold weather (I packed the wring one).'
Utterance: 'Oh I understand that for sure. I am not used to the cold weather either which is not helping. Would you be interested in a trade for water in exchange for firewood? '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi there. How are you?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Do you have any preferences in regards to the firewood, food, and water? I would like us both to get what we need.' 'I get really cold at night so I'd like to have extra firewood. ' 'Same. Plus I am planning on keeping a fire long into the night. Eating alot of food also helps keep you warm while sleeping. Perhaps I could offer you some extra food in return for some extra firewood?'
Utterance: 'Hmm I will have to think about this offer. How do you feel about the water packages?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi! I'm really excited for the camping trip, but I guess can we talk about it first? I don't think we're supposed to rush into a decision.' 'Okay, What did you thing about the camping trip?' 'I'm excited to go on it! I haven't gone it yet, that's why we're talking about supplies now.'
Utterance: 'Yeah, What did think about water? '
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Pretty good!  I am looking forward to going on this camping trip with my family.' 'Same here! We had a couple bumps in the road though, as our freezer stopped working so all our food went bad ☹️' 'That is rough ☹️  We should try to split the resources equitably then'
Utterance: 'Ya definitely. I need food and firewood most. What do you need?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'if you think I am not being fair can I have what you are asking for?' 'you told me i not fair that why i told you are not fare,3 food for me  will give 3 firewood for me, give 2 water for me, other we can end the deal and both we can forget the bonus' 'ok'
Utterance: 'then what will do ? if you ok for 3 food for me , 3 firefor you, 2 water for me , for this deal we can go forward?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'That does sound bad. I am going camping and my kids might want to stay up late so I will need extra firewood for this to keep light and more warmth. I will take all 3 extra of the food and the water but I need 2 firewood also.' 'no that won't work.  I will give you 3 food and 1 water.  I will take 3 wood and 2 waters.' 'I did not know you wanted water. Ok, that's great so I will take all 3 extra packages of food.As for the water I would like 2 waters because my dog is coming along with us for our trip and extra water for him will be needed.'
Utterance: 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'i will give you that in exchange for 1 food and 3 water with 2 firewood' 'please consider my request i'm big in size so please accept to give two pack of food and 2 water and 1 firewood' 'cool'
Utterance: 'do you accept my deal?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'But you need firewood for leisure, whereas I need firewood for survival.' 'Well it will keep us warm at night, too. I am very keen on at least one firewood for myself. ' 'Ok. How about I take 2 firewood and all 3 food? You can have the rest.'
Utterance: 'Can I get at least one food?'
Output: 


Answer: No