Lots-of-LoRAs/task353_casino_classification_negotiation_elicit_pref huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Nothing that I would trust. Additionally, I have a dog that will need water as well.' 'Oh well that is something to consider. I love dogs. 🙂. I'd be willing to take less in that case, and let you have 2 of the waters. Would you be OK with leaving me with 1? I'd be willing to split the food up the same way (you get 2, I get 1).' 'That works. I know water is important. I promise I won't be using it to water plants or wash clothes!'
Utterance: '🙂 haha of course! I think we've come to a good agreement then! You get the 2 Waters, and I get Water. You get 2 Foods, and I get 1 Food. And I get the 3 Firewoods. Correct?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello how are you today? 🙂' 'Fine.'
Utterance: 'You aren't very talkative are you? What preferences do you have for packages?😮😮😮'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'You must be a comedian.  We will need to come to a compromise because there's no way that's going to happen.  I am like a water buffalo so I'll need at least two waters.  In addition, my family is from the South and will need firewood as well.' 'I can't swim too. I think two waters will help me to survive on this trip and I will need at least two firewood to make fish or other food items for my family. ' 'You don't need this water to swim.  You can take two of the food if you're worried about food.  I will take two water and two firewood since I have a large family to nourish and keep warm.  Your initial suggestion of 3  waters and firewood is laughable.  Please provide a realistic compromise.'
Utterance: 'If I take two waters, 1 firewood, and 2 food supplies, this will help me during the trip. It seems as if you are more skilled than I am on a camping trip. Please consider my request☹️'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi fellow camper! What are your needs for the extra provisions.'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'We only have 3 of each to divide up.. so yes, you're going to have to give me one more on an item.. but in exchange I'm giving you 1 more on two different items.  I'm getting 4 items in total, you're getting 5.. - You're essentially netting 11% more 'items' than I am in this deal. ' 'thats the point as you need water so badly' 'Correct.. I do.. but if you're not willing to budge on this where you're still netting more overall value I understand - I'm bummed but I understand.'
Utterance: 'im contented with  what i have but im willing to trade as yu need more water so i need t make a profit'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hello how are you today? 🙂 Do you have any initial ideas on how to split everything? '
Utterance: 'I was thinking maybe I could have a majority of the fire food and you can have a majority of the water and food. '
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Sounds good, I need food the most, what is your most needed item?' 'my item is food too.' 'Ok, other than food I could use some firewood. Maybe you could take 2 food and I could take 2 firewood?'
Utterance: 'sure, but i will get what then?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'hello' 'Hi how are you?'
Utterance: 'I am good. How are You.   I was just thinking about how I need extra water due to a medical condition.  How about I take all 3 waters?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'No I can't do that unfortunately./' 'Ok, so I could take 2 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water, the original deal, do you still want to do that one?' 'I would prefer the original deal'
Utterance: 'Ok, I am good with the original deal also. '
Output: 


Answer: No