Lots-of-LoRAs/task353_casino_classification_negotiation_elicit_pref huggingface dataset:
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hey! I'd like some more firewood to keep my doggo warm. What do you need?' 'I need firewood as well. We have a large group consisting of mostly senior citizens, including my grandma, so we'd like the firewood to keep everyone warm.' 'I see. 😮 What are you least interested in?'
Utterance: 'We can make do without extra water. Can we trade two waters for an extra firewood package and an extra food package?'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: ' Hallo, how are you doing?' 'i'm well! how are you doing?' 'Good, but in shortage of some stuff.'
Utterance: 'likewise! what do you need?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Would you be willing to give me 1 food, 2 firewood, and 2 water?' 'I could make that work 🙂 I'm sorry if I came off mean, I'm just trying to make sure I'll be ok. I don't camp often, so I'm not sure how to prepare.' 'I understand. What are you using the extra food for?'
Utterance: 'I brought some pre-packed snacks, and a few sandwiches. I'm hoping there are no hungry animals around. What about you?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hi there! I was looking for 3 extra packages of food and 3 packages of firewood.'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'no then u have to give 3 food for me' 'I can have two food then and one wood and you can have the rest of the items' 'bro make it 3 food for me, u can take 3 fire wood  give me to water'
Utterance: 'you are not being fair, bare in mind we have same priority, so if you take all the food you have to give me the wood and water, or you can take all the wood and water and give me the food'
Output: 


Answer: No
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'How are you today? Did you have any preferences on the supplies we will be trading?'
Utterance: 'I am good. How about yourself? I think I would like some firewood to start off with. We like to have bigger fires. What about you?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi, it is nice to be going camping. I do not have a very good sleeping bag and I can get cold at night. It would be nice to have extra firewood. I dont eat much so I do not need much extra food. Would you be willing to give me two packages of firewood for a package of food?' 'I enjoy camping as well. However, my campsite seems to be a bit chilly at night. I'd be willing to part with some firewood, yet I'd need quite a bit of food to compensate. I also have a stream nearby so water is plentiful if you need that as well.'
Utterance: 'I may be able to do something with regards to food. Do you have enough water?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'I was actually saying you get 2 firewood and I get 3 waters. Then you could have 2 food and I get 1 food.' 'That's seems fair to me since we all need food to eat' 'Okay, I'm glad we were able to work something out!'
Utterance: 'Am also glad.You are more interested in water. Do you drink a lot of water frequently?'
Output: 


Answer: Yes
Definition: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'What do you think if in the camp we get together and have a meeting between your family and mine? We can have a small party to get to know each other better.' 'Sounds great!' 'Ok, my proposal is to give you all the firewood you need, on the condition that you give me all the water I need. And regarding food we can negotiate.'
Utterance: 'That sounds good. What do you propose on the food?'
Output: No

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'Good morning' 'Hi, how goes it?' 'It's going alright. What do you need the most to trade?'
Utterance: 'well, I run and could use some extra water. How about you?'
Output: Yes

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: 'Which one do you prefer most?' 'They sort of need more water for their meds' 'I'm sorry to hear that! But can you spare 1 for me since you probably don't need all the water.'
Utterance: 'Sure that sounds fair. Thank you. Besides water what do you need for your trip?'
Output: No

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: 'I am willing to give you the most water if I am able to have the most food.' 'Well I need some food because what if I get lost as well? ' 'I understand that, but walking away with the most food and the most water would essentially leave me for dead lol. Do you prefer water or food? '
Utterance: 'I prefer to have the most water as I have a medical condition that requires me to stay extremely hydrated at all times. If I get too dehydrated, it's extremely bad for me. How about I get 3 water and 1 food, and 2 firewood?'
Output: Yes

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: 'Hi, I am great 🙂 How are you? I would be happy for you to have two waters if I can have one. I would also like to have three things of food. I love cooking outside, so I would love to make large delicious meals for my group to enjoy' 'That sounds amazing and delicious! maybe we can compromise? Maybe, I can get all 3 waters and you can have all 3 Foods? what do you think? ' ' I would agree to that if I can also have two things of firewood. I am going to need a lot of wood, so I can cook the meals I am making 🙂'
Utterance: 'I completely understand, thank you for compromising with water and food. Wished we had 4 firewoods to divide and share it equaly, may I ask how long will you be camping for? Im afraid I need 2 firewoods as well, maybe we can see who has the greater need? '
Output: 


Answer: No