Definition: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Statement: Next to the MGM Grand you will find M and M World, four stories of merchandise and memorabilia dedicated to the candy that doesn't melt in your hand. Choices: 1. The candy has many fans who love its attractions. 2. There's four stories of memorabilia dedicated to a candy. 3. That particular candy melts and becomes difficult to eat.
Output: 3

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Statment: I've forgotten his name now, confessed Tuppence. Choices: 1. Tuppence forgot his name. 2.Tuppence remembered his name later. 3. Tuppence never could forget his name.
Output: 3

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Statement: In 1994, fraction of households owning a personal computer is 0.25. Choices: 1. In 1994, 0.25 of households owned a PC, which was a high sum at the time. 2. In 1984, 0.8 of households owned a PC. In 1994, 0.25 of households owned a PC.
Output: 3

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Statement: You could say you were in an auto accident, and the ambulance driver took you straight to Dr. Famous' office. Choices: 1. Ambulance drivers knew Dr Famous was great for treating famous people. 2. Ambulance drivers just took you to the hospital. 3. Ambulance drivers knew Dr Famous.
Output: 1

Now complete the following example -
Input: Statement: To reflect concerns about the inherent limitations in the number of studies supporting a causal association between long-term exposure and mortality, an Alternative benefit estimate was derived from the large number of time-series studies that have established a likely causal relationship between short-term measures of PM and daily mortality statistics. Choices:  1. The big number of time-series studies was used to create an Alternative benefit estimate. 2. When every study was checked, there were no concerns about inherent limitations that indicated an association between long-term exposure and mortality. 3. Because we have identified a solid link between PM and mortality, PM emissions should be reduced immediately.
Output: 


Answer: 2