Definition: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Statement: Next to the MGM Grand you will find M and M World, four stories of merchandise and memorabilia dedicated to the candy that doesn't melt in your hand. Choices: 1. The candy has many fans who love its attractions. 2. There's four stories of memorabilia dedicated to a candy. 3. That particular candy melts and becomes difficult to eat.
Output: 3

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Statment: I've forgotten his name now, confessed Tuppence. Choices: 1. Tuppence forgot his name. 2.Tuppence remembered his name later. 3. Tuppence never could forget his name.
Output: 3

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Statement: In 1994, fraction of households owning a personal computer is 0.25. Choices: 1. In 1994, 0.25 of households owned a PC, which was a high sum at the time. 2. In 1984, 0.8 of households owned a PC. In 1994, 0.25 of households owned a PC.
Output: 3

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Statement: You could say you were in an auto accident, and the ambulance driver took you straight to Dr. Famous' office. Choices: 1. Ambulance drivers knew Dr Famous was great for treating famous people. 2. Ambulance drivers just took you to the hospital. 3. Ambulance drivers knew Dr Famous.
Output: 1

Now complete the following example -
Input: Statement: Some medical ethicists and constitutional scholars say that the Supreme Court was wrong to create the pre-viability/post-viability distinction in the first place. Choices:  1. The pre-viability/post-viability distinction is well-received universally. 2. Scholars and ethics experts believe that having a pre-viability/post-viability distinction isn't correct. 3. Ethics experts and scholars think a pre-viability/post-viability distinction is unconstitutional.
Output: 


Answer: 1