Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?

Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns?  Seems to me we both have other things to work about.  Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool.  So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I

Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?

Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude.  I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages.  What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit.  I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?

Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Greetings!\n\nI was just wondering what your aims were regarding territory in the area? May I suggest that we keep Tyr as a DMZ for the time being?', 'Hi there, Italy!  In my experience, Austria and Italy fighting anytime before 1904 or so ends one way: they are both eliminated.  So keeping a DMZ is good (ideally find a way to keep all four of TRL, ADR, TRI and VEN as a DMZ) but even better would be a joint goal we can work together on.  Typically as Austria my thoughts are to keep Russia and Turkey from allying, and pick one side against the other.  If you wanted to go after Turkey with me, that could work, but if you wanted to go after France (with either English or German help), I could go after Russia with Turkish help.  In general, I guess I’m saying I’m willing to go almost any sensible way that goes along with an alliance which I can grow to trust 🙂', "I was definitely thinking of going after France, as I find they can quickly spiral out of control if uncontested.\n\nMight be best if you go after Turkey with Russia and I'll focus my attention West", 'Awesome.  I reached out to Russia and will let you know how that turns out. You have any indications that you’ll get any help against France? It can be a slow and annoying slog if you go 1:1 against them...', 'England seems to be interested, so hopefully we can nip France in the bud ASAP']
Output: 



Answer: So how did we want to move in Spring to set us both up to feel safe and not tightly entangled in each other’s business?  Any particular moves you have in mind, given what you’ve been hearing?