Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?

Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns?  Seems to me we both have other things to work about.  Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool.  So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I

Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?

Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude.  I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages.  What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit.  I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?

Now complete the following example -
Input: ['Hi there! I think us attacking each other early game is pretty dumb, what’re your thoughts?', "I agree. Even with the element of surprise, it's just too easy to defend the Piedmont/Marseilles corridor.\n\nIf France attacks Italy, it will most likely be Austria who benefits, and likewise if Italy attacks France the spoils probably go to Germany.\n\nGiven that, what are your plans? Are you planning to attack Austria early, or thinking of the standard move of: \nF Naples - Ionian\nA Rome - Naples\nA Venice H", 'Yeah I’m not planning on going for Austria off the bat, I feel like it usually just locks the two weakest countries into a fight that hurts us both', 'Understood, good to know!', 'Seems like everything went pretty much according to plan. Not sure why Turkey stayed in Smy instead of backfilling to Con. Seems a bit passive to me.']
Output: 



Answer: He’s scared of me pulling off a lepanto. What’s the deal for you guys, seems like you and england have an agreement at the very least to stay out of ENG. Did you and germany agree to that bounce in Bur?