Definition: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: ['Heyyyy Turkey', 'Whatcha thinking re: start of the game?', "It kind of depends. I'll probably want to stop Russia from advancing south", "I'm kind of afraid of Austria and Russia teaming together on me", 'I mean if that happens you’re donezos']
Output: What vibes are you getting from each of them?

Positive Example 2 -
Input: ['Gahhh I’m Italy fuck my life', 'Non aggression pact for these first two turns?  Seems to me we both have other things to work about.  Lmk what you’re thinking.', 'Sounds good with me', 'Cool.  So no moves towards each other?', "Yeah that's right. I'm not moving into Piedmont"]
Output: Rgr- neither will I

Negative Example 1 -
Input: ["Hey italy! good luck this game. I'm guessing you and Austria will be pals, you and France will be rivals?", 'Well good luck to you too! No idea yet who is a friend. Have you heard anything interesting?', "I have some agreements with France. If those are upheld, I'd bet France goes for Por and Spain in 1901. You might want to ask about whether a fleet gets built in Mar during the 1901 build, if you haven't already, as this would be an indicator of aggression towards you.", "Germany seems like a bit of a wild card. Haven't talked in depth with Austria.", 'Do you have any sort of aggression in your opening, or are you just planning to be neutral and secure Tun?']
Output: Have you heard anything interesting?

Negative Example 2 -
Input: ['Gah I’m Italy fuck everything', 'Let’s talk my dude.  I think an initial ceasefire for this first turn- or maybe longer!- may be in both of our advantages.  What’re you thinking?', "I tend to agree, I would rather move east here, and I'm fine with some sort of Lepanto.", "Slow day at work so I'm free if you want to talk a bit.  I've sent one message to Turkey and heard nothing yet so I don't feel super great rn.", "Hey Italy, would love to talk strategy if you're free for a bit!"]
Output: How is russia doing?

Now complete the following example -
Input: ["Hello Germany, nice to make your acquaintance. \n\nI've been thinking about this game alot, because the fact that it will only last until 1910 really changes my strategy. Add in that no one is likely to NMR and I believe it will be near impossible to solo. \n\nNormally when playing Russia I try to grab a couple German centers around 1904, allowing me to hold over the stalemate line setting up a solo when I conquer the East. Since I'm not intending to solo in this game, however, it doesn't make sense to go after your centers. It would be much better for both of us, I believe, to agree to a pact of non aggression. I could even offer some help against England, if there came a time when you wished that. What do you think?", "Interesting points.  I've been thinking about how the format and time limitation might change the game as well.\n\nFor transparency, England reached out to me as well, and generally I think Germany working with England is, in a vacuum, the best course.\n\nI'm fine with a non-aggression pact, but we need to set pretty clear ground rules - I'm significantly more vulnerable than you.  Interested in each of us setting up a proposal, and see how well they match?", 'How about a commitment to something like the following through Spring 2003.  We can revisit or extend from there, and of course any of these are subject to specific agreement otherwise:\n\n- Total DMZ in SIL & PRU\n- No German units in BoT or LVN\n- Germany concedes Sweden, but only to be occupied by fleets.\n- No Russian units in BAL\n- No army builds in Berlin\n- No army builds in StP\n- Notify before a build in WAR\n\nWhat do you think?', 'I agree to all of those points.\n\nJust to be clear, England is not necessarily a target of mine, but if necessary I can act as an insurance policy against English aggression for you.', "By the way, for whatever it's worth I am hearing talk coming back to me that you are looking to open north.  Again, it's spring '01, so talk is pretty cheap.  But just thought I'd flag it for you."]
Output: 



Answer: Talk is cheap, and after Spring resolution you will see that I fully intend to abide by our agreement. 

The fact that you brought this up with me really builds trust with me. I did tell Austria that I was heading North West, but obviously that is a lie. I hope that you see it to be in your best interest to keep that confidential because I truly do intend to work with you all the way through 1910.