Lots-of-LoRAs/task149_afs_argument_quality_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: or, my politicians are telling me the end justifies the means, so perhaps, like them, we could sacrifice innocents for the overall plan.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: If you intended to "implicate a no" then you need to realize that saying "no" follows a premise that says that the death penalty is illegal.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Once the danger is gone killing a person is simply murder.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: If inmates in for life actually got life in 100% of the cases, I'd be more inclined to support a ban on capital punishment.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: That victim has a family, that is a father, brother, sister, mother, cousin.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Almost like how a liberal will bemoan a corporations concearn for it's share holders over thinking of the damage it does to the environment and shoddly product it pushes onto consumers.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: They will think that if the government does it, it's right for them to do it.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I support the death penalty, but feel there needs to be a better system of checks and balances to ensure each individual gets a fair trial using all evidentiary methods available.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The bulk of the increased cost goes to the lawyers, investigators, the court and the jail.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Yes, there is a difference between the truly "I had no connection to the murder" cases and "I did it but I got off because of legal error" cases.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The lives saved by the death penalty, which I suspect is 0, unless the answer to the above question is "yes", is smaller than the innocents killed by the death penalty.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I would fear the death penalty very little in my home state due to the fact that it has only been used 3 times since 1976, and 228 inmates currently reside on death row.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: No, it says that they will die by the sword, that's not the same thing.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Besides, if you knew anything about this process, which is quite clear you know absolutely nothing, you would realize that 1 appeal is not enough.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: that is just as harsh as justifying the death penalty because prisons are too overcrowded.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: 3 - Inequities in representation (meaning if you have the money you can afford a team of good lawyers so it's generally only the poor who see the chair)
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Whatever the offender did should have the same done to him/her.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Are you going to keep offering them opportunities for change, when they've proven 13 times that they don't want to change?
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: If we should abolish the death penalty because of emotions, then for every life taken by those very murderers, we will be held accountable and responsible for.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Seventy-five countries and territories, including Australia, Germany, and Spain, refuse to impose the death penalty for any crime.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Now I'm not unreasonable, I think those that get a life sentence converted to a death sentence should get a choice of method of destruction, including heroin overdose, or any preferred method of death.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I'm all for taking away the massive benefits, but I can't extend punishment to someone who is merely taking advantage of the liberal give-away programs.
Output: 


Output: Invalid