Lots-of-LoRAs/task149_afs_argument_quality_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: You see even though death row can take multiple years, technology doesn't catch up with the crime sometimes for well over 15 years.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: People convicted in those crimes had nothing to do with DNA but police errors upon which they were exonerated.This took place in a time when sentencing disparity was present.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The murder rate for the state of New York, a state without the death penalty has increased this year with a higher rate of murder than it was in 2009.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: but yes only in extreme cases, and only if we can prove the person is guilty without a doubt.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I dont think staying in prison for life is more punishment.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Quite a lot of people think that criminals should be punished for the sake of punishing them, whether or not it deters anyone; I had thought you were one of them.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: And if it doesn't... the people who have killed the most under the death penalty will end up strapped to that bed too if they make it a capital offense to accidentally kill an innocent person.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Instead, the prison systems should do a better job of identifying the worse inner-prison troublemakers to begin with and isolating them or controling them more.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: However, this may seem unfair considering how many people are exonerated by DNA every year?
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: What Old Testament part from your last post did I ignore?
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The difference is one has to commit a seriously heinous crime to receive the death penalty and with abortion the victim is an innocent unborn child.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I am not sure, which also begs the question on my support for the death penalty.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: However, religious ideas are baseless, and in no way can be used in any argument effectively.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: DNA testing capabilities allowed them to determine that the executed men were, in fact, innocent.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I believe that we should attempt to prevent suicide in the general population.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: There are currently over 3,300 people in California who have received this alternative sentence, which also has a more limited appeals process last approximately 3 years.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I do believe in the death Penalty, eye for and eye.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I highly doubt the backing of why you personally would want the death penalty invoked is because you're worried at home that a mass murderer is going to escape and kill you or someone you love... seriously?
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Since there are many people sentenced for murder that are actually innocent (~10% who were sentenced to death who were proved innocent in appeal), you would be causing a lot more innocent deaths than you would be saving.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Lastly, there are no advantages to the death penalty expect for apparent save the many at the expense of the few because of the greater good.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I had asked for 5 examples of innocent people who were executed.
Output: 


Output: Valid