Lots-of-LoRAs/task149_afs_argument_quality_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: If you see him before i do , get a good one in for me , ok.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Firstly there has been no proof that an Innocent man has ever been placed on death row.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Of those reasons which you gave, which ones do you think cannot be accomodated by lesser senteces and NEED the death penalty?
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: And no, I don't the death penalty is murder.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The reason why I'm for death penalty is because some people can be so dangerous fir the society, like serial murderer or maniac, so that they must be punished by this method.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Some have claimed that the death penalty is culturally biased towards black people.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: variables that we in the U.S. don't have and therefore have to use the death penalty.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Just because I thought that California is using the chamber as only state.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: politicaly correct death penalty we impose here in America may not deter crime as well as we think it should.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: If you're willing to XXXX somebody away because they dissed you in front of your homies and made you lose your street cred, that's a very poor excuse for murdering somebody, their friends, their family, etc.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: First, the Bill of Rights was written by people who supported the death penalty, therefore it cannot be contradictory to the views of those who are in favor of imposing capital punishment.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: We could work at making it cheaper, and not going with this 'non cruel punishment' thing... (Hangings are cheap and they work), plus the prison sentences are way too long for those that get the death penalty.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: you might want to think twice before you suggest such a thing again.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Secondly, my textbooks that i use in the pursuit of criminal law, i can google them up and find articles in those books cited from my textbooks.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Under the ethical norms of Western culture, the death penalty is wrong.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: States without the death penalty generally have lower murder rates.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: An argument for putting people to death is so that they can never escape and kill again.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Capitol punishment is not just the execution of murderers, but the execution of anyone by the state.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Morality aside, no evidence of deterrence aside, the death penalty costs more than life imprisonment.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: There is  no  social need for the Death Penality, so it ought not be used, since it only leads to more pain and suffereing.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I seem to be missing the time when "Jesus Christ told us point blank that capitol punishment was downright evil."
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The flawed sense in the Death Penalty may be the lack of ethical principals, but it has improved over time.
Output: 


Output: Valid