Lots-of-LoRAs/task149_afs_argument_quality_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: After all, if you are using a particular punishment for the wrong reason, then perhaps you shouldn't make that type of punishment.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: And no, society is not better served by life imprisonment than the death penalty because society then learns that consequences aren't very severe for committing an act of murder.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I think that the state are charged with the sole of responsibility of protecting the innocent and fighting crime, therefore the crime control model of criminal justice comes into effect.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: we'll move that debate over there, because ghetto will probably get really XXXXXX if we discuss it here.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Punishment as a concept DOES encompass killing as a possible form of punishment.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Japan also has heavy handed police measures that have been condemned by the United Nations.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: One must be subject to requirements of "appropriateness" when defending against rapists and murderers forcing themselves into one's own dwelling.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: But you have to wonder, how can there be no shred of supporting evidence after thousands of years of use, if it IS a actual deterrent?
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: A murderer is chosen to deliver the highest moral laws.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Even if you take capitol punishment completely out of the realm of God and religion, specifically Christianity, it is wrong.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The "eye for an eye" tag doesn't quite fit.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: in your basic question you are bringing up basic human survival instincts, no one wants to die and one will do whatever is necessary to survive.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Agreed, I just don't share their beliefs as to why the penalty should be stopped.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: We are going to assume for the purpose of this that the person the guy saw was NOT Jim.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: If they don't want to kill an innocent person, stick to life in prison.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Some poll numbers showing most Americans opinions about captial punishment:
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I see what you mean, but i'm still against killing people .
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: There is a reason that the phrase includes the term "reasonable doubt".
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: It's ok for government to force people acting in self defence behind bars.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Something quite different than when you're pushed infront of some detectives and actually questioned over your motives for murdering someone.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: You've blindly followed the misguidings of the smug, know-it-all, been-there-done-that, cyber genius daewoo who knows nothing more about me than I've printed on 4forums.
Output: 


Output: Invalid