Lots-of-LoRAs/task149_afs_argument_quality_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and them lawyers are really expensive.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Therefore the argument of death as a deterent is a joke.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: as for the innocent people who have been murdered by criminals, of course the statistics show more people having been the victim.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: This study has been so distorted in the media and within anti death penalty literature that it really should be mandatory teaching in journalism schools as a fact checking disaster.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Without corroboration, a conviction is not "beyond reasonable doubt" Luckily for the legal process, your cretinous opinion is irrelevant.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The rwandan massacre is also a very well known exemple of how machetes, stick, etc, can be used at a very large scale, in a short time.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Percisely why you shouldn't be using all of those pieces of emoticonXCensored.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: it seems as though your concept of ideal justice necessitates punishment immediately.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: This was one of his most important messages, yet now we learn that you are wishing death upon these people, not just the extreme suffering that you previously wished upon them.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Also, within the USA, murder rates are consistently lower in states that don't have capital punishment.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: if you believe in the sacrifice of jesus and repent, you have "earned" your happiness
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Actually, the idea that the death penalty costs more than lifetime imprisonment has been disproved many times.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: I agree with most of your post, but what other purpose does the death penatly serve other than to make victims familys "feel better".
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: When the criminal is in a well controlled prison, self-defense is no longer relevant - he is not capable of harming anyone.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: The death penalty was included in that "law."
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: We just need to receive a good education, with the best guidelines possible.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Some murders are done spare of the moment, it doesn't make it right, but people can change.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: It should be done, but only if you are 99.9% sure that the person actually did it.
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Im not gonna post anything yet though, I need to revaluate the issues first and then I'll post something which will later be slaughterd by Dou Maxwell.
Output: 


Output: Invalid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Or you could merely ignore them and concede that the death penalty is flawed, kills innocent people and costs the lives of innocents in the use of how it is funded
Output: 


Output: Valid
Definition: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: The fact that you do not want to donate to these poor, needy people only shows me that you really do not care about the embryos
Output: Invalid

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time
Output: Valid

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Over here it's unlikely that the man would ever find himself in a courtroom except for the purpose of testifying against the guy with the missing ear.
Output: Valid

Now complete the following example -
Input: Wonder why we can't get a candidate in office who has strong views for the death penalty and almost immediate execution after conviction.
Output: 


Output: Valid