Lots-of-LoRAs/task146_afs_argument_similarity_gun_control huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person.
 Sent2: The fact that you've committed murder is irrelevant and the only thing that matters is if a person has a gun?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Simple if the gun haters did not want your guns why do gun haters only want gun control laws that law abiding citizens obey and criminals do not?
 Sent2: All of the gun control laws the gun haters want will only be obeyed by the law abiding citizens!
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: My point was that the theory that more gun control leaves people defenseless does not explain the lower murder rates in other developed nations.
 Sent2: A much higher gun ownership rate than other developed nations could explain this- that although crime occurs less frequently in the US crime is more likely to involve guns in the US so someone is more likely to die.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: First you say no law will ever stop criminals from getting guns but now youre saying that criminals are never gun owners.
 Sent2: Right now it is against the law for the government to keep a database of gun owners, that that law would have to be changed, and I think you also know this.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
 Sent2: Ok, so are the gun haters claiming the police department are giving the guns criminals use for crime back to the criminals?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: It involved a ban of guns within a certain proximity to schools.
 Sent2: A gun ban would make guns on the same level as drugs....
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Gun ban = No civilians can protect themselves using a firearm = Criminals can illegally purchase guns, like tons already do.
 Sent2: Do not ban guns when guns are the tools of man.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: People who follow laws, aren't causing problems with the guns they own.
 Sent2: Law abiding citizens obey the law, there can surely be no reason to prohibit them form having guns.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Although I think a gun-ban should be effective since you can�t eliminate criminality entirely, and it�s the criminals, lunatics and otherwise unbalanced people that you don�t want to have guns or have an easy time getting guns.
 Sent2: It is just a case of prevention, remove guns being so easily accessible and you then decrease the gun crime and remove the need for guns to defend yourself.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Since that ruling most lower federal courts have continued to reject the argument that the second amendment protects an indivual right to own a gun.
 Sent2: Some passionately assert that the Amendment protects an individual's right to own guns.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Gun free zones are areas where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to carry guns.
 Sent2: Making a gun free zone does nothing to prevent guns from entering it.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: We support letting people who already have guns actually being allowed to carry them, but I haven't seen anyone saying that we have to get hundreds of thousands of more guns bought up and distributed.
 Sent2: And as far as carrying in public, as long as I have commited no crime, then why should anyone need know I have my gun.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The first part indicates the importance of the militia, the second part illustrates that the people may be part of that well regulated body or not without infringement of their right to keep and bear arms.
 Sent2: Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The second amendment is not primarily there to protect our right to keep hunting weapons.
 Sent2: Gun haters if the 2nd amend did not protect the right to bear arms then all guns in America would be banned.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: No mortal man has the right to deny me the ability to maintain life within my body.
 Sent2: I for one would rather be able to defend my children without the risk of trying to overpower another person to keep the bat from hitting my children.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.
 Sent2: If this is the case, then gun laws have a provable effect on how 'armed' criminals are - more gun control = less gun-carrying criminals, fact.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: For instance I don't think that eliminating gun control is the only answer crime control is also needed.
 Sent2: I think we recognize that gun control laws can reduce the number of criminals owning guns although not disarm every criminal.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar