Lots-of-LoRAs/task146_afs_argument_similarity_gun_control huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: (or, for those who favor the alternative collective right view, ���the right of militia members to keep and bear their militia arms when called for by the state for militia service?�۝)
 Sent2: 2) ensure that the right to keep and bear arms for a militia is not infringed.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Illegal firearms can be identified and linked to other firearms and to crimes and criminals.
 Sent2: Other felons, such as car thieves, burglars and whomever else can be convicted of felonies without the use of guns might be considered for a reprieve or a complete release from the ownership ban.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: You're the one who has to explain why the US crime rates are so high when other countries manage to have guns and not go nuts.
 Sent2: Are you saying that since all guns have been banned for civilian use in Countries like England, that murders by guns and gun crimes have gone to absolute zero there?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: 1) Protection - The argument suggests that guns protect us from dangerous individuals.
 Sent2: We have a right to use a gun to defend ourselves and others.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If today we were to ban guns all the law abiding citizens would give up their firearms and protection.
 Sent2: If we look at D.C. we can see that people who had registered their guns before the gun ban were allowed to keep their guns after the ban took effect.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: So, no, I wouldn't say there was any "gun control" as you (Galileo) tried to pass off as early gun control laws.
 Sent2: I think laws stating that you should not be allowed to carry guns onto airplanes or into schools are examples of common sense gun control laws meant to protect people.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: In recent years it has been suggested that the Second Amendment protects the "collective" right of states to maintain militias, while it does not protect the right of "the people" to keep and bear arms.
 Sent2: The 2nd amendment only protects a states right to own a Militia.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The fact that you like cars is why you will tolerate the fact that more kids are killed by cars then guns.
 Sent2: people who want to kill, will kill if you ban guns, they will kill with knives, or something else.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: You've made the argument that registration of firearms is perfectly legal and constitutional, despite the fact that the Firearm Owners Protection Act forbids any and all type of database of guns or gun owners.
 Sent2: What it seems like you are claiming is that if the owner would otherwise let you in if you didn't have a gun, you have a right to go in by the 2nd amendment.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Another large source of guns used in crimes are unlicensed street dealers who either get their guns through illegal transactions with licensed dealers, straw purchases, or from gun thefts.
 Sent2: �ۢ Trafficking in new firearms, interstate and intrastate, including by federally licensed firearms dealers, large-scale straw purchasers or straw purchasing rings, or small-scale straw purchasers from gun stores, gun shows, or other premises;
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Countries that ban guns or implement stricter laws concerning firearms have lower crime rates.
 Sent2: Then why do nations which ban guns have a much lower gun crime rate than the US?
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: One private individual asking another if they have guns in the home and then offering them a pamphlet on firearms safety if they say yes has nothing at all to do with gun control or the second amendment.
 Sent2: Speaking of the 14th amendment, there is one scholar that says an individual right to own a gun came with the 14th amendment, not the second amendment.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: All gun free zones can do, is keep law-abiding citizens from having guns.
 Sent2: Gun free zones are zones where law-abiding citizens are forbidden to have guns because law-abiding citizens obey the law about gun free zones.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Well let me first get to this just so everyone will know which side of the gun issue im on, I am an avid gun owner and I support any laws that target criminals while unafecting lawfull gun owners.
 Sent2: I would support any law that target criminals, but I will not support you as long as you target lawfull gun owners.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Sure you say guns don't kill people but people kill people, but the gun is only a tool or a means to that end.
 Sent2: Guns don't kill people, people kill people: absolutely true, but guns allow people to kill people with greater efficiency, which is not necessarily a good thing outside of the battlefield.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Even without this preamble the second amendment would still only protect a right in connection with militia service.
 Sent2: Your argument is that the Second Amendment was designed for purposes relating to the militia exclusively, and individuals being armed for matters not related to the government was never something the Founding Fathers felt necessary to protect.
Output: 


Answer: Similar