Lots-of-LoRAs/task146_afs_argument_similarity_gun_control huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Gun control makes criminals lives much easier, because they can keep their guns, while they don't have to deal with armed citizens.
 Sent2: I see, so banning guns just stops law abiding citizens from having them, yet your family of criminals buys them from people who legally obtained them, or has them legally obtained for them.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Muggings, burglaries, rapes, assault and battery are all examples of violent crimes that don't require a gun.
 Sent2: With gun control, murders will probably go down just a little, but violent crimes, such as Rape, sexual assult etc, robbery, burglary, and assult will skyrocket.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Burglars do not use guns, muggers do not use guns.
 Sent2: Other felons, such as car thieves, burglars and whomever else can be convicted of felonies without the use of guns might be considered for a reprieve or a complete release from the ownership ban.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Guns are dangerous even though when they are banned people will still make them people think that they will still use them less people will use them less deaths will be by guns.
 Sent2: Furthermore, the Founders envisioned people being armed with much less powerful weapons when they wrote the Second Amendment.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The legal market for firearms gets killed off in hopes of hindering criminals, and instead the criminals continue buying from the black market, importing them illegally, or making their weapons themselves.
 Sent2: If you take away the civilian's only right to self defense, how are they suppose to defend themselves from the criminals who buy weapons and drugs from the black market illegally.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I don't believe guns are good for anything, and I see no use in having them, but I believe it is everybody's right to produce or keep one, as it is just a weapon like anything else.
 Sent2: I don't think it's so much the media as the fact that no one is used to seeing people with guns, so when they do they assume they are in the middle of a combat zone.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: For instance I don't think that eliminating gun control is the only answer crime control is also needed.
 Sent2: Again, I don't think anybody will argue that owning a gun prevents crime.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
 Sent2: Gun ownership is a protected right, and the fact that criminals use guns in the commission of crime will never change this fact.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I think the government has taken responsibility for the law abiding citizens by ensuring that nobody can carry a gun or other dangerous weapon on board a plane.
 Sent2: I think law abiding citizens should be allowed to carry conceled weapons.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: On average, the states that have done the most to regulate private gun sales appear to have lower firearm death rates and lower firearm homicide rates.
 Sent2: In short, the panel could find no link between restrictions on gun ownership and lower rates of crime, firearms violence or even accidents with guns.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: It is not the legal gun doing the crime it is the illegaly owned guns, so if you take my guns the criminals have no one to stop them since they have guns we don't.
 Sent2: If guns would be made illegal, then only criminals would have them.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: They didn't shoot someone because they were criminals, they because criminals because they shot someone, Your point boils down to 'Laws do not work because people disobey them-we should have no laws'.
 Sent2: I could easily point out how many people are killed by criminals because they aren't armed and able to fight back, and that could be seen as grounds for removing the restrictive gun laws we have in this country.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The only thing we've been over, is that government and gun control is racist, not the Second Amendment.
 Sent2: The Second Amendment was never about individual gun ownership, it's only purpose was proper case of a government organized and controlled militia."
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The 2nd Amendment is not there to entitle you to all of the gun control you want!
 Sent2: If you need guns to ensure that your government doesn't become corrupt or tyranical you wouldn't want them to know where the guns are, would you?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I support a persons right to own a gun but if people start getting too many freedoms dealing with their weapons then things could get worse.
 Sent2: I already said children could tote around their parents guns.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Why do people that want what they call reasonable limits on the right to bear arms believe criminals will obey a law stating criminals cannot have guns?
 Sent2: I could easily point out how many people are killed by criminals because they aren't armed and able to fight back, and that could be seen as grounds for removing the restrictive gun laws we have in this country.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar