Lots-of-LoRAs/task146_afs_argument_similarity_gun_control huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Right now we have the worst of both strategies, gun laws are restrictive enough that not many criminals are being stopped by citizens; they are permissive enough that low level criminals may still own a gun legally.
 Sent2: Which is why the ban is a bit of a poor compromise, they've banned guns for law abiding people but they've not done enough to make sure criminals don't have them.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: So now you're saying that just because somebody owns a gun, they're somehow more likely to start killing people than somebody who doesn't own a gun?
 Sent2: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: ,   and I was being kind when I say there was no change in the murder rate, The Anti-gun argument was that at least England�۪s gun control will stop mass shootings.
 Sent2: Now tell me, how is gun control going to stop people from making their own?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: On average, the states that have done the most to regulate private gun sales appear to have lower firearm death rates and lower firearm homicide rates.
 Sent2: The homicide rate has climbed drasticaly with every gun control measure.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If this is the case then gun control laws will have no effect on who carries melee weapons, so you argument falls apart because 'the law abiding' can remain armed.
 Sent2: IF you previously had laws that made openly carrying weapons illegal, and you then pass a concealed carry law, if somebody is carrying a gun and it is not concealed, they are breaking the law.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: Should guns be controlled, that would give people the right to demand that you surrender your weapons, just as the state currently demends that you hand over all terrorists, drugs and illegal material.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Gun hater pilot logic is for companies and governments to deny a person the right to bears arms to defend ones self then not be held responsible when these companies and governments fail to protect the unarmed citizens!
 Sent2: Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Also if both points are true, would you sacrifice you right to protect your rights with guns (rather than politically) for a crime rate low enough where you don't feel you need a gun for protection?
 Sent2: If you need guns to ensure that your government doesn't become corrupt or tyranical you wouldn't want them to know where the guns are, would you?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar