Lots-of-LoRAs/task146_afs_argument_similarity_gun_control huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If people are going to carry guns for protection, they should be encouraged to put lots and lots of rounds through the gun.
 Sent2: Usually it is 'oh look out look out, them gun nuts are going to do something.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Now tell me, how is gun control going to stop people from making their own?
 Sent2: If we look at D.C. we can see that people who had registered their guns before the gun ban were allowed to keep their guns after the ban took effect.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If the Second Amendment were purely about the militia, and absolutely nothing else, then there would be no way retired members would be allowed to remain armed for their own private purposes.
 Sent2: Amendment protects the right of the states to arm their militias.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: In recent years it has been suggested that the Second Amendment protects the "collective" right of states to maintain militias, while it does not protect the right of "the people" to keep and bear arms.
 Sent2: This makes sense when you consider that the second amendment protects the right of the people to bear arms in connection with an organized militia.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: They do not have the expressed, enumerated power to pass any law regarding guns in the constitution.
 Sent2: Which passed the law requireing "smart guns", if they ever become available (right now they do not exist).
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: While many guns are taken off the street when people are arrested and any firearms in their possession are confiscated, a new study shows how easily arrestees believe they could illegally acquire another firearm.
 Sent2: And that assumes that gun control will have no effect on illegal firearm ownership.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Are you saying that the only reason there are criminals armed with guns is because we're not willing to accept gun prohibitions as the answer?
 Sent2: Just to be clear, you're saying that only gun laws, somehow, are unable to deter criminal acts?
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The 2nd Amendment is not there to entitle you to all of the gun control you want!
 Sent2: So I think gun control on the magnitude you want would effect it, how could it not?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: What I mentioned about the liberals refers only to government powers not granted by the constitution.
 Sent2: Again, the decisions I'm referring to as "activist" are those that are granting powers to the government that are not enumerated.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I can understand your belief that gun control won't work and that owning guns is a good thing, I don't agree with it, but is hardly beyond comprehension.
 Sent2: I fail to see how asking about gun ownership is any different.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I can understand your belief that gun control won't work and that owning guns is a good thing, I don't agree with it, but is hardly beyond comprehension.
 Sent2: I believe in gun control (and wrote this piece to satirize pro-gunners) because I hate guns and want to see them all banned, which is why I own guns and also enjoy reading firearms-related literature.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: You're the one who has to explain why the US crime rates are so high when other countries manage to have guns and not go nuts.
 Sent2: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: You are pulling the same XXXX Doc did in thinking that because I don't think more guns equals less crime that I automatically must think it means MORE crime and that gun control laws are effective and needed.
 Sent2: Right now it is against the law for the government to keep a database of gun owners, that that law would have to be changed, and I think you also know this.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The embraced anti-gun rights interpretation of the 2nd was that it was a provision that had but one function and intent, to protect the "state right" to organize and control their militia from federal interference.
 Sent2: The 2nd Amendment gives citizens the rights to own a gun, not the Militia Act.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Gun control makes criminals lives much easier, because they can keep their guns, while they don't have to deal with armed citizens.
 Sent2: Gun control should be left to the person holding the gun.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Gun haters will stop when the right to bear arms is banned! 
 Sent2: Gun haters will do any thing to ban the right to bear arms!
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Gun control will not work because criminals do not obey gun control laws. 
 Sent2: Gun control laws do not stop criminals from getting guns.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar