Lots-of-LoRAs/task145_afs_argument_similarity_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Only if they try to murder somebody after they are in prison do they deserve the death penalty?
 Sent2: If a person just raped someone (this is just an example) they shouldn't be killed for it, but something like a mass murdering or serial killing should be dealt with by putting them to death.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I have evidence that says that innocent people are convicted of crimes.
 Sent2: As far as the deterrent argument, I have said this before, and I will say it again: There is no accurate way to measure if the death penalty is deterring crime or not.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: That right to life was taken away, I agree, but we will not accomplish anything if we kill someone else.
 Sent2: If someone keeps killing and killing and killing, we need to stop him from taking lives.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: You should also note that the one scenario I think the death penalty is acceptable for is if they try to escape using violence or if they attack another prisoner.
 Sent2: You can attempt say I'm being illogical, but you have yet to explain why the death penalty is preferable to imprisonment.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If we can not prevent the innocent from unjust punishment, we should not have the death penalty.
 Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: How many people with a life sentence without parole have died an prison and been innocent?
 Sent2: The antepenultimate man to be sentenced to death was innocent.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty is the only just punishment for their actions.
 Sent2: Show said criminal that their actions were unnacceptable to society, and therefore they must pay a penalty for their actions.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: After all, the person you're torturing may actually be innocent.
 Sent2: Again... there is nearly never a fail-safe, sending an innocent man to death isn't something you can take back.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If I heard of an innocent stranger being brutally killed, I might want to see the perpetrator suffer because of the suffering of the victim - that is VENGEANCE pure and simple.
 Sent2: I have been a victim of rape and if I were a victim of murder I would not desire the death penalty for the perpetrator.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I assume in what follows that we, the country or the state, execute only for the crime of murder, though many capital punishment adherents would use it for other crimes, such as child rape, treason, arson, robbery and even fraud.
 Sent2: That should be a crime which should result in the death penalty.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: What does them being released have to do with the death penalty?
 Sent2: If someone is wrongly convicted of a crime and put in jail, they can be released if they're found to be innocent.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: So, seems to me that when you make death a quick (as in timely) and certain punishment, there is most definitely a deterent effect.
 Sent2: The dealth penalty is not as simple as it seems.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
 Sent2: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Only .06% of people who have killed kill again when they escape, are released, etc.
 Sent2: They support it because killing murderers is the right thing to do.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Either way it will cost money, yet if the death penalty cut out some of it's steps it'd be less money than life imprisonment.
 Sent2: Life without parole costs the justice system WAAAY less than death penalty cases do.
Output: 


Answer: Similar