Lots-of-LoRAs/task145_afs_argument_similarity_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: There are no children being killed, and killing a child is murder in America.
 Sent2: How do you compare killing a little child who has never had the chance to live to the execution of a criminal who has been raping and killing little children?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: As long as we sentence people to a life in prison we are also GUARANTEED to sentence an innocent person.
 Sent2: How many people with a life sentence without parole have died an prison and been innocent?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: That doesn't ensure that we don't end up murdering innocent people.
 Sent2: Hitler killed a whole race, you are basically saying you don't mind if we kill a bunch of innocent people as long as we get guilty people as well.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If we don't stop the death penalty now, we will put innocent people to death while we try to fix the problems.
 Sent2: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The way I see it, capital punishment doesn't have to be expensive at all.
 Sent2: Though I would not call the death penalty murder, I am personally against it.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty is simply a legally imposed punishment given to felons who commited crimes for which the death penalty is applicable.
 Sent2: You may think of it as an arbitrary tit-for-tat policy, but I see it as a legal, court ordered punishment handed down by our judicial system for a crime to which the death penalty is applicable.
Output: 


Answer: Similar