Lots-of-LoRAs/task145_afs_argument_similarity_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: In fact, with the death penalty you get more due process than someone with a life sentence...there aren't many advocates for helping those guys out.
 Sent2: If you get a life sentence, you shouldn't have any choices whatsoever.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Exactly how many innocent people has the death penalty killed?
 Sent2: But I oppose the death penalty because it has the capacity to kill innocent people.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: so you weigh whatever monetary savings (if any) over the life of someone found innocent after conviction (even if rare)?
 Sent2: After all, the person you're torturing may actually be innocent.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: There are many reasons the death penalty should be abolished.
 Sent2: If anything, this kind of "argument" is an argument for abolishing the death penalty, since it isn't used uniformly across the entire country.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: , I believe the death penalty has deterred at least some people from committing murder.
 Sent2: So I think it is better to imprison those who deserve death for life, rather than even once as a people murder the wrong person.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Only some states use the death penalty, only some countries allow the death penalty.
 Sent2: Over 40 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes since 1990.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The question with the death penalty is not kill or give no punishment.
 Sent2: It is called the death penalty for a reason...it is a penalty, a punishment.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The person having been convicted of a crime punishable by death and subsequently sentenced to death should be put to death.
 Sent2: No, if it is already known that this person made the crime, the death penalty may be used.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If there was another factor associated with the increase in the murder rate and not the death penalty, then the article itself would have pointed it out.
 Sent2: Well according to your own paper, it says that you can't prove that the death penalty increases the murder rate.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: killing a person, no matter the reason, is still murder.
 Sent2: if a person kills another person it is murder, whether it is sanctioned by the state or not.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I seem to be missing the time when "Jesus Christ told us point blank that capitol punishment was downright evil."
 Sent2: But Jesus Christ told us point blank that capitol punishment was downright evil.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: ...and if I do someday murder someone, I should be killed.
 Sent2: Oh, and by the way, the criteria that I mentioned earlier was enough to kill someone for treason, so why shouldn't it be enough to kill someone for another crime?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: So all in all I believe in the death penalty.
 Sent2: Well, since I believe in that there are crimes and criminals deserving of the death penalty, "tookies" execution served justice in my book.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I'm against captial punishment for the reasons that wjim1269 gave and also I think that just because someone murders someone it doesn't mean they should automatically forfeit their own life.
 Sent2: When they are about to be shot just think what would be happening, some unlucky person would be dealing with the fact that they were going to have to take someone's life.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: What is the REASON behind "an eye for an eye" justice?
 Sent2: An eye for an eye won't make the whole world blind if the person never took the eye in the first place.
Output: 


Answer: Similar