Lots-of-LoRAs/task145_afs_argument_similarity_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I don't think the death penalty should be banned.
 Sent2: The way I see it, capital punishment doesn't have to be expensive at all.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If someone killed my relative, I wouldn't want them killed, I would want them to spend the rest of their lives in hard, back breaking labor.
 Sent2: If someone kills my child, my parent, my siblings, my love, i would want them to pay the price.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: We shouldn't just kill someone if they commit a crime.
 Sent2: We let killers out of prison so they can kill again.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Because justice operates to protect society by deterring future crime, one would have to show that the death penalty prevents more crime than life in prison, thus fulfilling the function of justice better than that of life in prison.
 Sent2: The death penalty doesn't need to serve as a deterrent to crime.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has not been shown to be more effective than life imprisonment in deterring murder, hence we should choose life imprisonment.
 Sent2: In fact mudkipz, many people would prefer the death penalty of life in jail.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I would support the death penalty IF there was a way to ensure that it would not put innocent people to death.
 Sent2: "We know for a FACT that innocent people have been put to death already"- then give me their names.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I think the death penalty should only be used when there is undeniable proof against the suspect.
 Sent2: I don't think everyone should be put to death.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: No matter how well the justice system works, we will always risk convicting innocent people.
 Sent2: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Saying the death penalty is a justified method of punishment for a crime just because the criminal is a killer himself is a completely contrived reason.
 Sent2: Is it reason to do away with the death penalty?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I think the death penalty should only be used when there is undeniable proof against the suspect.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: So if we can assume that innocent people are convicted in capital punishment cases, shouldn't we be free to assume that innocent people are being convicted in non-capital punishment cases as well?
 Sent2: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I don't even give a shit about the death penalty, I was just making a point.
 Sent2: This is why I said what I said in the first place about why I'm against the death penalty.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty is gives the ability to off killers and murderers, as, if they were given life in parole, they have the ability to escape and continue their crimes.
 Sent2: Still, in some cases death penalty would be the right thing to do (no point keeping mentally insane murderers just locked up for their whole life, although there could be some ways to use them).
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I am "for" capital punishment... but if a criminal shows a desire for death over a life sentence, I prefer to be sadistic.
 Sent2: I see no point in letting someone live who does not want to live, or letting someone die who does not want to die.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I'm not really in favor of killing innocent people either.
 Sent2: There is no way that I believe it is okay to execute innocent people because of a flawed system.
Output: 


Answer: Similar