Lots-of-LoRAs/task145_afs_argument_similarity_death_penalty huggingface dataset:
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Actually we still kill the wrong person all the time.
 Sent2: Additionally, i hold the belif that if it is wrong for an individual to kill, then it is also wrong for the state, which is a representation of the individuals, to kill as well.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: An argument regarding the death penalty should be confined to discussions regarding those who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to death.
 Sent2: Although there is much controversy about him, I agree that prisons, especially for those for whom the death penalty could be considered, should be punishment.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Well I think that if someone commits a crime worthy of the death penalty they should get a sentence for life that way they can't be a repeat offender.
 Sent2: I firmly believe that some crimes and criminals are deserving of death.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: We could get the person who may kill in the future.
 Sent2: That right to life was taken away, I agree, but we will not accomplish anything if we kill someone else.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Firstly, many people say that Europe does not have the death penalty so the U.S should not.
 Sent2: I don't see where in your first source it says that the majority of all countries (or the majority of people in every country) support the death penalty in some cases.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If we continue to allow the death penalty, we are no better than the murderers and rapists that we punish with the death penalty.
 Sent2: So how about we stop a penalty that has executed innocents?
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Others have said that the death penalty is biblically wrong.
 Sent2: Yeah, including the human judgment that says that the death penalty is wrong.
Output: 


Answer: Similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: therefore the death penalty should not be used, simply because it kills innocent people.
 Sent2: Essentially, you believe a fetus should be allowed to be killed simply for existing, while you protect the lives of people who have murdered other innocent people (as murder is generally what a person will get the death penalty for).
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Obviously, if someone were found innocent before execution, they would not be executed.
 Sent2: There have been numerous people who were presumed innocent after execution because the evidence showed that they were not guilty.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Also, the dates of these crimes point to another point supporting capitol punishment.
 Sent2: Also, please explain how the Supreme Court can logically back up a claim that capital punishment is not a deterrent to capital crime.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: I don't think everyone should be put to death.
 Sent2: This is why I said what I said in the first place about why I'm against the death penalty.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If you're arguing for a general principle (eg that Capital punishment is acceptible and effective) then you have to argue in the general case:
 Sent2: So, in summary, you aren't against the death penalty on principle.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: Life without parole lets you fix that mistake since they can be released if they are found innocent - not so with the death penalty.
 Sent2: You need to find lots more for the death penalty to save more lives than innocents that have been executed by it.
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: save the money...feed starving children and free this "bad guy"...let the families find them...kill him for us for free!
Output: 


Answer: Not similar
Definition: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: Therefore, people will think twice before they choose to commit a crime and also, the death penalty has been proven to deter the crime rate. 
 Sent2: i think the death penalty should be abolished because some people are sentenced to deathfor a crime they might have not committed.
Output: Not similar

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Sent1: Death penalty cases involve a lot of appeals and the lawyers are really expensive. 
 Sent2: Death penalty cases cost way more because they usual go through a series of costly appeals.
Output: Similar

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Sent1: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder. 
 Sent2: In addition, it is evident that the death penalty does not deter murder rates.
Output: Not similar

Now complete the following example -
Input: Sent1: In fact I'll go a step further and state that we're too lax with the death penalty, we need to make it more severe.
 Sent2: What we need are harsher sentences including the death penalty.
Output: 


Answer: Similar