Definition: You will be given a review about a book, an item, a place or a movie. After that, a question is given that you should answer using a certain span of the review. Your answer should be from the review itself and should not contain extra words, and should not be a combination of different spans. If there's no direct answer to the question, answer with a part of the text that is the most relevant to the question. See the examples for clarification.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: review: I had a smaller headset that went on the ear. After a 8 - 10 hour workday, my ears were throbbing red and painfully sore. With this headset, I can go the same shift and not feel any pain on my ear. They may feel a little on the heavy side, but if you adjust the head phone cups just right and stretch them, you will not have any problems.Quality and sound, words cannot explain. Its so clear and loud, the headset holds in the sound. When I am on a call or listening to music, I do not hear nothing else, but what's coming in through the headset.
question: Does the headset block sounds from outside?
Output: I do not hear nothing else, but what's coming in through the headset.

Positive Example 2 -
Input: review: This book, besides being a page turner has a lot of food for thought. Story is thrilling and I can guarantee you that it will catch you by surprise. Inferno educated me and made me think about life and decisions. Great book. Highly recommend it. I can't wait for my husband to finish reading it so I can discuss it with someone.
question: How exciting is the story of the book?
Output: Story is thrilling and I can guarantee you that it will catch you by surprise.

Negative Example 1 -
Input: review: Food was very tasty but the bathrooms were kinda gross. I wouldn't go out of my way to eat here again. It was satisfactory but nothing special.
question: How were the bathrooms?
Output: Food was very tasty

Negative Example 2 -
Input: review: My family stayed at the Hotel Rex while visiting my sister in San Francisco. It's a charming hotel with a great staff. Our room was large and very quiet. The decor is fun, old-fashioned and trendy all at the same time. Breakfast in Cafe Andree downstairs was tasty and the service was fast. Great location, convenient to Union Square and whatever city amenities you need. Valet parking was responsive to whenever we needed our car. Best of all was the pug dog Max, who lounged on one of the chairs in the reception area while his owner worked the desk. I would highly recommend this hotel to anyone who wants to stay in the center of downtown without being in a large corporate-type hotel.
question: How was the room?
Output: large and

Now complete the following example -
Input: review: Ok, not evil, but whatever.This lighthearted offering from Steven Spielberg is superior to `The Terminal' but not quite as infectious as his beauties like `E.T.'.  It is fun and exciting and engaging, but I find it also to be slightly forgettable.  It is one of those films that leaves no complaints while in the midst of enjoying it, but it isn't one that you're going to remember three days later.Make sense?The film tells the true story of con-man Frank Abagnale Jr., who by the time he was 21 had made a living at deceiving and `stealing' from the government.  He was a pilot, a doctor, a lawyer, all the while never being any of those things.  He was, simply put, a genius.  Carl Hanratty was the FBI agent who was on his tail for years, never quite getting close enough to catch him (well, eventually), always one step behind.One thing to describe this film is `jovial'.  It is a happy fun film.  Within the restraints of the genre it works nicely.  It does lack the `human' element that could have really set this film apart (and made it more memorable).  While the film remains exciting and entertaining it lacks that gut punch that could have made this movie `mean something', and in the end it would have completed it.  That said, happy is what happy does, and happy does a lot for this film.  Not only is the plot rather boisterous, but the performances are all just so delightful.  Leonardo DiCaprio captures the suave and childlike adorableness of Frank Jr. rather remarkably.  A lot of my cinephile friends consider this one of his best performances.  I kind of agree, since it really capitalizes on everything that makes him such an endearing actor.  This is a far better performance than his confused turn in `Gangs of New York', which was released the same year.  Tom Hanks is perfectly matched here, for he really understands how to play up the genre here.  As many know, I am not a gigantic fan of Mr. Hanks, so for me to praise a performance takes a lot from me.  But, as anyone who knows me knows, I consider his lighthearted `non-baity' work to be his best (see `Big' and `That Thing You Do' for examples).  Christopher Walken may not be the most jovial character in the bunch (and he does insert the films only `human' element) but he nails his character.Also, look for Amy Adams in a scene stealing supporting role!All in all, `Catch Me If You Can' delivers a very strong and very likable experience.  It's a film that may not `stick with you', but it is a film you will have no quarrels with watching again and again.
question: Is that movie good?
Output: 


Answer: exciting and engaging