Definition: Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: I was told, in person over the phone, that my shoes were on their way. They have my money. I have no shoes. 
Question: What may happen after the call?
Output: I will return the shoes and get back the money.

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: you see , at my age relationship is kind of important and i thought i got the one after all these years . I noticed that once again i was wrong . i was good simply because i was good , i was caring , helping , supportive , bla bla blaaa . 
Question: What may happen to me?
Output: I broke up with my friend.

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: I was told , in person over the phone , that my shoes were on their way. They have my money. I have no shoes. 
Question: What may happen after the call?
Output: I will have shoes.

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: you see , at my age relationship is kind of important and i thought i got the one after all these years . I noticed that once again i was wrong . i was good simply because i was good , i was caring , helping , supportive , bla bla blaaa . 
Question: What may happen to me?
Output: I was wrong.

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: The future of talent management systems promises to record the competencies uncovered in the selection process , allowing for the early application of learning programs in cases where skill gaps have been uncovered . This is definitely something organizations should keep in mind when planning their NEO programs . " The survey found that a full 86 % of the responding companies have a program in place to orient new employees . For about half ( 46 % ) , the process is done in a day or less , with another 26 % wrapping the orientation up in two to three days . As far as offering new employees a " wow " factor , more than half ( 54 % ) rely on company - related items ( pens , shirts , pads , binders , folders , etc . 
Question: What seems to be a conclusion of the study ?
Output: 


Output: Orientation should be improved .