Definition: Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: I was told, in person over the phone, that my shoes were on their way. They have my money. I have no shoes. 
Question: What may happen after the call?
Output: I will return the shoes and get back the money.

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: you see , at my age relationship is kind of important and i thought i got the one after all these years . I noticed that once again i was wrong . i was good simply because i was good , i was caring , helping , supportive , bla bla blaaa . 
Question: What may happen to me?
Output: I broke up with my friend.

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: I was told , in person over the phone , that my shoes were on their way. They have my money. I have no shoes. 
Question: What may happen after the call?
Output: I will have shoes.

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: you see , at my age relationship is kind of important and i thought i got the one after all these years . I noticed that once again i was wrong . i was good simply because i was good , i was caring , helping , supportive , bla bla blaaa . 
Question: What may happen to me?
Output: I was wrong.

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: My point in mentioning the above is not to highlight tensions between two states - the United States and Iran - but to note that there is considerable consensus in the political community about the wisdom and value of maintaining channels of communication among groups with highly divergent views , differences of principles and severe tensions . Religions for Peace knows from experience that in the search for peace we are very often called to relate with those with whom we disagree on highly important issues . Religions for Peace came to this position shortly after its birth . 
Question: Why does Religions for Peace hold this position ?
Output: 


Output: It has learned from experience.