Definition: Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Positive Example 1 -
Input: Context: I was told, in person over the phone, that my shoes were on their way. They have my money. I have no shoes. 
Question: What may happen after the call?
Output: I will return the shoes and get back the money.

Positive Example 2 -
Input: Context: you see , at my age relationship is kind of important and i thought i got the one after all these years . I noticed that once again i was wrong . i was good simply because i was good , i was caring , helping , supportive , bla bla blaaa . 
Question: What may happen to me?
Output: I broke up with my friend.

Negative Example 1 -
Input: Context: I was told , in person over the phone , that my shoes were on their way. They have my money. I have no shoes. 
Question: What may happen after the call?
Output: I will have shoes.

Negative Example 2 -
Input: Context: you see , at my age relationship is kind of important and i thought i got the one after all these years . I noticed that once again i was wrong . i was good simply because i was good , i was caring , helping , supportive , bla bla blaaa . 
Question: What may happen to me?
Output: I was wrong.

Now complete the following example -
Input: Context: It 's a scam , pure and simple . ABN _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Consider me to be in a state of shock . For nearly half a decade Diebold has always responded in the identical way to every single report of a problem or security vulnerability with its e - voting machines : attacking those who pointed out the problem and claiming it really was n't a problem at all . This has happened time and time again that I ' m not even sure how to react when the company ( renamed Premier to get away from the Diebold name stigma ) has finally admitted that its machines have a flaw that drops votes . 
Question: What will likely happen if the vulnerability continues ?
Output: 


Output: They will respond in the same manner.