question is not raised in this case. Um, there are arguable justifications for that initial commitment, and we don't discuss one way or another whether those justifications are sufficient to validate that initial commitment and we don't think the Court need reach that question. Whatever reasons there are that might have init- -- have vali- -- have justified his initial commitment, those reasons would have justified only a commitment that could have lasted, without the Government meeting a burden of proof, for as long as he could have been incarcerated upon conviction -- If his initial commitment is not punitive, then how is the statutory period of, uh, time that he could serve on the criminal charge relevant? Well, we think the only justifications that could, the only