been convicted rather than acquitted. Conceivably, he will remain committed in the hospital for the rest of his life. Petitioner contends that whatever the validity of his kinitial commitment to the hospital, once he had been confined there for longer than he could have been incarcerated upon conviction, his commitment became an indefinite one. And thus, the Government was constitutionally required to prove the need for his commitment by clear and convincing evidence, something which the Government has yet to do with respect to Mr. Jones. If it cannot do so now, Petitioner submits, he is entitled to release. Mr. Wasserstrom, you're not challenging, as I understand it, the -- the initial commitment. The only question, if I understand your position correctly, that you raise is whether he