Thereafter the Veteran filed a substantive appeal ( VA Form 9 ) . To the extent that statement of the case addresses clear and unmistakable error in the prior rating decisions , the Board finds the statement of the case to be inadequate in that respect , as detailed in the remand section . The Veteran appeared at a hearing before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge in August 2013 . The electronic file shows that the Veteran perfected an appeal with respect to an initial rating in excess of 60 percent for coronary artery disease . As such , the issue is reflected on the title page . Testimony at the Board hearing raises the issue of whether there was CUE in a March 1993 rating decision that