The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1835-06-16 00:00:00

• BXTENSIVE ' • CARPET - AND . FURNITURE WA REHOUSE. • • BRANCH-and SON: Respectfully inforON SALE, theALE, Public that they have • BY PRIVATE CONTRACT, At the HANOVER ROOMS, An extensive and Valuable Assemblage of 'FASHIONABLE CABINET FuRNrruRE Of every description, Including DRAWING-ROOM SUITES, Of real and Imitation Rosewood Card,,Console; Loo, Work, Miter; e,nd Sipta Tables, Chairs, 'Douched, Sofas, Tea Poys, La.cli s eir;Ticrutoires, Cheffoniers, Canterburies, and Skreens; - Elegant LOUNGING and LIBRARY CHAIRS ; FOLDING, CHAIR, and SOFA BEDS; MAHOGANY- ARTICLES, • n Bookcases, Secretaires, Pedestal and Cell t Sideboards, Cheval Skreens, Single and Double Wa bes, Trafalgar Chairs, Dining,' Card, Library, Loo, embroke, Snap, Work, and Skreen Tables, Couches, Sofaii; Children's Chairs, Cots, Crib!, Chests of Drawers, Night Commodes, Bedsteps, Bi dets, Hat Stands, Boot Racks, Music Stands, Music Stools, &c. JAPANNED, STAINED, and FANCY CHAIRS, In the greatest variety ; Fear-post, Cottage, Canopy, Frcnch, Nursery, and Press BEDsTEADS; FEATHERBEDS; HAIR and STRAW MATTRESSES; PAINTED CHAMBER REQUISITES, Of all deseriptiatu ; Elegant CHIMNEY and DRESSING-GLASSES; BATH 4r GOUT CHAIRS; CHILDREN'S CARRIAGES; &c. ' TOGETHER WITH A very diversified and extensive Assortment of BRUSSELS, DAMASK, VENETIAN, and KIDDERMINSTER CARPETING, Of the best man uf acture and-newest patterns ; DRUGGE S ; HEARTH RUGS ; FIGURED FLOOR and LOBBY CLOTHS, Of all dimensions, Far cutting 6 S r s' Cabins, 4-c.; HAIR Ap4 tt . a E v i z At , te ß r r E ts Assortment of Inottrante Notice. ATLAS 'ASSURANCE COMPAN Y. EFE DEPARTMENT. "DEMONS Assured for the whole term of Life in- - Great Britain or Ireland respectively, will have addition made to their Policies every seventh year, r n equivalent reduction will be made in' the future paymen f Premiums, at the option of the Assured. ' The following Table shows the 1 Policies for MOO, which hay, teen Years at Christmas, 1830... total Additions made to Life , e been in force for the Four- tri •• ' i . f;" Amount that has been ST I ) Sum Annual .. 1 g ' added to the Sum '' Assured. PremiuM. „to a . i assured payable at the 4 ..; 7' 8 ' Party's death. . Q ._......... -..-.......... 15 £lOOO £2l 15 1 •20 £230 • N 1000 • 24 . 0 1 25 • 236 1000 26 . 'l4 2 30 6.. :244 74 1000 29 18 4 35 • 256 • '.° 1000 33 -19 - 40 278 A 1000 38 19 2 45 ' 304 .t... 1000 45 I 6 8 50 . 340 : : , r) 1090 53 • 3 4 55 382 ' - ' 4 1000. 63 13 -4 60.1 449 Equivalent Reductions have been made in the future payments of Premium, where the parties assured have desired to have the amount of surplus Premiums so applied. The next Valuation will be made at Christmas, 1537, and Policies effected before that date will participate in proportion to the time they may then have been in force. The Company Purchase their Policies at an equitable value. FIRE DEPARTMENT, In addition to the benefit of the late Reduction in the Rates of Premiums, this Company offers to Assurers the advantage of an allowance for the loss of Rent of buildings rendered uutenant able by Fire. FARMING STOCK iS now exempt from Duty, and may be assured at 2s. 'per Cent., without any restrictive clause, instead of ss. as heretofore charged. Policies becoming due at MIDSUMMER (24th June) should be renewed within fifteen days from that period. The Company's Rates and Proposals may be had at the Office in London, or of any of the Agents in the Country, who are authorised to report on the appearance of Lives proposed for Assurance. HENRY DESBOROUGH, Secretary. • London, June, 1835. The Agents for this Company are:— Messrs. SWAINSON and HORNBY, Bretherton's-buildings North John-street. Mr. W. H. M'DOWELL, 6, Lower Castle-street. Appleby • Mr. E. Eddlinsou. Ashton-under Line T Finney. Blackburn • R Wilding. Bolton C Briggs. Burnley. and Todmorden. T. E. Hammerton. Bury Chorley . John Lation. Clitheroe W. L. Oddey. Macclesfield R. Turner. Manchester. R. and C. Hervey. Oldham Ortnskirk James Robinson. Preston . Wm. Lancaster. Rochdale. James Hartley. Stockport W. DownalL Ulverston W. Postlewaite. Warrington Thomas Leigh. Wigan J Hilton. anal Notireo. NOTICE. ALL persons havi?tc' any claim or demand agains he estate of the late Mr. - WILLIAM ALLEN, T acconist of Whitechapel, are requested to send the particu rs thereof to the executors, Mr. \V m. MOORE, Mr. Wss. x, or Mr. J. Kaxas, Whitechapel. And all persons wh tood indebted to the said Mr. William Allen, are requested to pay the andunt of their respective accounts forthwith, to the executors, No. 39, Whitechapel.—Liverpool, June 12. 1835. N.B. Two capital Snuff Mulls on sale. THE creditors who have proved their debts un r a fi at in bankrup ' tcy, awarded and issued forth a inst JOHN HODGKIN, of Liverpool, in the County of ncaster, brush manufacturer, dealer and chapman, may rec • e a dividend on the amount or their respective claims on pplication at the office of Mr. BkHRY, Accountant, 3, Cook-street, John-street, on Saturday next, or any subsequent Saturday, between the hours of Eleven and Two. RA•DCLIFFE and DUNCAN, Solicitors, / ►ytHE Creditors (if any) of Mr. RICHARD 11TH, late I of Sir Thomas's -buildings, Plumber, wh ied on the Ist May last, are requested to send in their Acc is for examina tion and payment to Mr. JOHN TARLTON, odney-street, one of the Executors, or to Mr. NORTH, Solicitor, Exchange-alley. WHEREAS a fiat in bankruptcy is awarde 'end issued forth against EDWARD LACY, of ughborough, in the County of Leicester, baker, dealer, an chu.pman, and he being declared a bankrupt is hereby requ' ed to surrender himself to the commissioners in the said fiat arced, or the ma jor part of them on the twenty-fifth day June instant, and the twenty-first day of July next, at eleven o'clock in the fore noon of each day at the King's Head Inn, in Loughborough aforesaid and make a full discovery and disclosure of his estate and effects, when and where the creditors are to come prepared to prove their debts, and at the first sitting to choose assignees, and at the last sitting the said bankrupt is required to finish his examination, and the creditors are to assent to or dissent from the allowance of his certificate. All persons indebted to the said bankrupt, or•that have any of his effects, are not to pay or deliver the same, but to whom the commissioners shall appoint, but give notice to Mr. JOHN ALLEN, Solicitor; No. 6, Wharton street, Lloyd-square, Clerkenwell, Loudon, or to Mr. Fos- BROOKE, Solicitor, Loughborough. THE commissioners in a fiat in bankruptcy, bearing date the 30th day of January, 1835, awarded and issued forth against JOHN . of Liverpool, in the Cuipity of Lan caster, merchant, dealer, and chapman, lately carfying on bu siness at Liverpool aforesaid, in copartnershif with John Timothy Swainson, as merchants, under the firm of Willis and Swainson, intend to meet on the 4th day of Uuly next, at three o'clock in the afternoon, at the. Clarendon-rooms, in Seuth Jobn-street, in ,Liverpool, in the said County of Lancaster, to audit the accounts of the assignees of the estate and effects of the said bankrupt, under the said fiat, pursuant to an act of Par liament made and passed in the sixth year of the reign of his late Majesty King, George the Fourth, intituled, "An act to amend the laws relating to bankrupts." , FOSTER and LLOYD, Solicitors. N OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the Second day' of June, thstaat, an order was signed by Charles Orreil and Richard Edivardpi, Esquires, two of his majesty's justices of the peace, in and Mr the county of Lancaster, acting and resid• ing within the division of Preicot, in the Hundred of West Derby, in the said county, for diverting and turnip certain )tighway within the 'township of Knowsley, in t parish of Huyton, in the said hundred and county, lyin etween the township of Kirkbrand the town of Prescot, in e said hundred and county, for'the'length of 77t.3 yards, or reahouts, and a certain highway, being a branch therefrom, wards Knowsley hall, in the said hundred and county, io e length of 263-1 bards, or thereabOuts,' and a Certain hig vac, being another ranch therefroas, towards' the town of Liverpool, in the said hundred and countr, for the length of 530 yards, or thereabouts, and particularly described In the plan thereunto annexed, and that the said of will be 'lodged with the Clerk of the Peace for the said county, at the general quarter sessions of the peace, to be holden by adjournment at Ki r kdal e , i n an d for the said county, on thellitti day of July next; and also that the said order will, at tbe:iaid quarter sessions, be confirmed and en rolled unless, upon an appeal against the same, to be then made, it be otherwise determined. 'HEVES and PENIBERTON, Attorneys. Prised, 3d .le, LS3S. XTOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the Second day of 1.11 June instant, an order was signed by Charles Orrell and Richard Edwards, Esquires, two of his majesty's justices of the peace, in and fur the county of Lancaster, acting and residing within the division of Prescot, in the hundreiYof West Derby, in the said county ; for diverting and turnip a certain public footway within the township of K.nowsle , in the parish of Buyton, in the said hundred and court , lying between the township of Kirkby and the town of Yes t, in the said hundred and county, commencing at the boll' yof the said townships of Knowsley and Kirkby, oppositet certain farm house in the said last-mentioned township, called "Tbe Horns House," and extending thence unto and ending at or near a certain farm house, in the said township of Knowsley, in the occupation of Isaac Foster, for the length of 6152 yards, or thereabouts, and particularly described in the plan thereunto annexed, and that be said order will he lodged with the Clerk of the Peace for the said county, at.the general quarter sessions of .the peace, to be holden by adjournment at Kirkdale, in and for the said county, on the 20th day of July next; and also that the said order will, at the said quarter sessions, be Confirmed and enrolled unless, upon an appeal against the same, to be then made, it be other wise determined; . H EYES and PC,MBERTON, - .A.ttorneys. Promo:, 3tl Jane,•lB34. EDUCATION. • • WAVERTREI?., _NEAR LIVERPOOL. THE,MISSES ELLIOTT beg to announce their intention of succeeding the MISS DUCKWORTHS, of LARK FIELD, after the MIDSUMMER VACATION, in theity.stablishment for the Education of Young. Ladies. _lsiirt , "nt Masters will attend to give Instruction in the usual'USTnches of Education. Undeniable references can be given. Circulars may be obtained upon application at Mr. GRAPEL'S, Church-street. WATERLOO HOTEL, CROSBY. TOWERS begs respectfully to inform his Friends that ►7. his OPENING DINNER, will take pl ee on WED NESDAY, the 2.lth instant. 'rickets One Guinea, to be had ar of the Angel Hotel, and Waterloo Hotel, Crosby. Dinner on the Table at Five o'clock precisely. JAMES HEYWORTH, Esq., President. Mr. GEORGE ROBINSON, Vice-President. PRICES OF SHARES, LIVERPOOL, JUNE 15, 1835. Per Shah. Liverpool Coal Gas Liverpool New Gas and Coke Company, £100 New Shares, premium £5O Liverpool and Harlington Water Works - 460 0 0 Bootle ditto . 306 10 0 Exchange Buildings Liverpool and Manchester Railway £lOO paid 200 0 0 I) i tto Old Quarters 25 --- 49 0 0 Ditto New Quarters - 48 15 0 Bolton and_Leigh ditto - 80 0 0 Ditto 25 - 20 0 0 Warrington and Newton ditto - 110 0 0 Kenyon and Leigh ditto lOO --- 110 0 0 Wigan Brahch ditto • lOO - 90 0 0 Preston and Wigan North Union Line ditto 2O - 13 5 0 St. Helens and Runcorn Gap ditto ... 100 -- 45 0 Leicester and Swannington ditto 'o - 49 0 0 0 Stockton and Darlington ditto - 298 0 0 Manchester, Bolton, and Bury Railway ) 38 -. 20 2 6 and Canal Leeds and Selby Railway Grand Junction ditto 100 - 100 0 0 30 -- 40 10 0 London and Birmingham ditto 35 - 45 10 0 Bank of Liverpool lO - 14 5 0 ,Bank of Manchester 25 - 32 5 0 Manchester and Liverpool District Bank l5 --. 20 5 0 Commercial Bank of Liverpool lO - 13 7 6 Liverpool Marine Assurance Company. 25 - 21 0 0 Oldham Gas Light and Waterworks lO - 17 0 0 Manchester Fire and Life Assurance Co 10; -- 10 0 0 Ocean Assurance Company - 10 0 0 Northern and Central Bank of England lO -- 11 0 0 WANTED, Exchange Shares—Liverpool New Gas and Coke Shares—Mersey and Irwell. RICHARD DAWSON, Share Broker. 3mperiat Parliament. IIOUSE OF LORDS.-THURSDAT. SAVINGS BANKS. The Marquis of SALISBURY, after referring•to a defalcation which had occurred to a savings' bank in Staffordshire, to the extent of £lO,OOO, through a fraud committed by a clergyman, asked Lord Melbourne whether be intended proposing any change in the existing law, which left too much power in the hands of the trustees ? Lord MELBOURNE replied in the negative. POOR LAWS IN IRELAND. In answer to Lord Carhery, Lord Al ELBounNu informed the house that his majesty's ministers intended to introduce a poor law bill for Ireland. NiiWCASTLE AND CARLISLE RAILWAY BILL. This bill was read a third time and passed. The BISHOP of LONDON made an ineffectual attempt to in. troduce a clause prohibiting Sunday travelling by this toad which was lost on a division, 19 voting for and 40 against it. Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS.—THURSDAY.. ENNIS ELECTION COMMITTEE. Sir ROBERT HERON, the chairman of this committee ; re. lolled to the house that Mr. Hewit Bridgman, the sitting mem. ier, was duly elected. IPSWICH ELECTION. At the close of a long discussion, John Bury Dasent, Esq. John Bond, Arthur Bott Cooke, Robert Burchamp Clamp. John Pilgrim, Frederick O'Malley, Esq., John Eddowes Spar. row and John Clipperton were ordered to attend at the bar o the house. WINDOW TAX. Sir SAMUEL WHALLEY moved a resolution for the abolition of the window tax. On a division the,numbers were, for the resolution 16, against it 204, BOROUGH OF HULL. Mr.BAINEs moved for a new writ for this borough, in the room of David Carruthers, Esq., deceased.—The house ad journed at One o'clock. HOUSE OF LORDS.-FRIDAY. SLAVE TRADE. Lord BROUGHAM said that he understood there were in the Mauritius3o,ooo slaves, the greater part of whom had been im ported there subsequently to the passing of the law prohibiting that traffic. He wished to know whether any steps had been taken to ascertain what number of slaves had been so imported; and next, whether any measures had been adopted to render it impossible for any one of the slaves so imported from .being taken into account, in awarding the compensation to be paid to slave proprietors, under the emancipation act. Lord GLRNELG had no doubt of there having been illegal importations of slaves into the Mauritius : but he had no means of judging of the nuinoers so imported. The great difficulty in the case was this—that there had been no illegal importation of slaves for the last fifteen years into the Mauritius, whatever might have occurred before. This had been ascertained from persons appointed to investigate the subject. Lord BROUGHAM must say, that if we were to pay £500,000 or £600,000 in respect of illegally imported slaves, it would be one of the most hateful operations ever perpetrated in the financialconcerns of this country. VOLUNTEERS TO SPAIN. The Duke of WELLINGTON gave notice that he should on Monday (yesterday) move for the production of the London Ga zette, containing the order in council suspending the foreign en listment act, for the purpose of having thatdocumeat explained by Lord Melbonrne. HOUSE OF COMMONS, FRIDAY. SLAVE EMANCIPATION ACT. Mt. F. BUXTON gave notice that on Tuesday next (this day) he would bring forward a motion to suspend the payment of the £20,000,000 granted under this act, on the ground that the sti pulated conditions in favour of the negroes had not been com pl►ed with. He wished to know whether any measures bad been taken to effect the release of negroes illegally introduced into the Mauritius, and to prevent compensation from being given to their owners under the emancipation act. Sir GEORGE GREY said the subject was one of great diffi culty. The slaves imported previously to the late act had be come subject to apprenticeship, and since the passing the act the whole mass of slaves had been convected into apprentices. The question regarding compensation stood on different grounds; the assistant commissioners, who adjudicated on the claims for compensations, could summon witnesses, and were sworn to administer justice impartially. Mr. BUXTON expressed himself dissatisfied with the answer. IRISH TITHES, Lord MORPETH postponed his motion from Friday next to Friday the 26th July, as it had been intimated to him, from a quatter to which he wished to pay deference, that it would be an inconvenient day. (Laughter from the opposition.) GENERAL TAXATION. Mr. Robinson moved for a committee to ascertain if the pre sent system- of taxation pressed on any peculiar class of the community, and what means could be devised to remove that pressure. The motion, on a division, was negatived. The house then went into a committee of supply. DREADFUL ACCIDENT AT NEWCASTLE-UPON TYNE.-FIVE MEN KILLED. ' (From the .Newcastle Journal.) On Thursday afternoon, the three end houses of the mag nificent new street leading from the Turk's Head, now in course of erection by Mr. Grainger, in the Nun's Field, in this town suddenly and mysteriously came down with a tremendous crash, without the slightest previous warning or suspicion of danger. At the moment of the catastrophe, about 150 workmen, includ ing labourers, bricklayers, stone-masons, and carpenters, were at work on the portion which fell in. We regret to add that 17 of the men were unhappily precipitated to th ground with the falling stones, timber, and other materials, but the remainder, many of them almost miraculously, escaped by descending the gangway and clinging to the scaffolding. The crash was so sudden as to resemble an earthquake, or some other convulsion of nature. A knowledge of the calamity spread throughout the town with the utmost rapidity, causing the most painful fore bodings and rumours, as to the extent and cause of the mischief. Crowds of people flocked to the several avenues of the Nun's Field; and it was distressing in the extreme to witness the wild agonies of those females who had husbands, fathers, or brothers employed in Mr. Grainger's extensive works, amounting in all to about 700 people. The three houses which fell had been raised to nearly their intended elevation, and many others in the same line of . street are roofed, and in a state of great forwardness. Mr. Brown, the principal foreman, had been round the scaffolding to inspect the work 'only three or four minutes betbre the melancholy ac cident took place, and as Mr. Brown came down the gangway, Mr. Grainger himself went up. The latter gentleman, at the instant of the calamity.- as on the scaffolding attached to the upper story of the house adjoining those which fell, giving some directions to a workroau, and was only about thirty feet froin the part that fell down. Five men were taken from the ruins dead ; ten removed to the Infirmary . seriously wounded, some of whom were not ex pected to survive. On the following day a coroner's inquest was held on the dead bodies; they returned a verdict of "Acci dental Death, occasioned by the falling of the houses, but from what cause is'unknowu to the jurors." LONDON GAZETTE.-FRIDAY, JUNE 12. INSOLVENTS. June 11.—Thomas Livesey, sen., George Livesey, James Livesey, and Thomas Livesey, ju n ., Bury, Lancashire. woollen-manufacturers. June 12.—Henry Powell, London, linen-draper. --Jonathan Beeden, Campsey-Ash, Suffolk, innkeeper. Thomas Bickford, London, rectifier. BANKRUPTCY ANNULLED. Henry Davis, Carmarthen, cabinet-maker. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. Ralph Boardman, Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire, money- s crivener. BANKRUPTS. John & Edward Payne, London, coach-lace-mannfachirers—Josiah Brandon, London, broker—Thomas Partington, London, confectioner Hawkini,Warwick, builder—William Burton, Great Glenn, Leicestershire, currier—Samuel Standidge Slater, Kingston-upon- Hull, corn-merchant—Henry Goode, Birmingham, wholesale-grocer. DIVIDENDS. July 6, W. Jackson and G. Longstatr, London, leather-dressers — July 6, S. Wells, London, hatter—July 6, W. Baker and T. Little, London, woollen-drapers—July 3, J. and J. Brickwood, J. Rainier, W. Morgan, and J. Starkey, London, bankers—June 30, J. Windross, London, linen-draper—July 3, J. Ryalls, London, hardwareman—July 3, J. Inglis, London, baker—July 3, W. Starling ' London, hatter— July 6, J. Cattell, London , silk - man — July 6 , W. Harvey ft T. Grice, London, builders —July 6, J. Cuff, London. jeweller—July 3, J. Stam mers, London, cabinet - maker — July 3, E. Howlett and J. J. Brim mer, London, printers—July 6, R. Gill and C. Griffin, London, mer cers—July 6, M., F., and J. Court, and J. L. Diggles, Lo n don, mer chants—July- 6, W. W. Tayler, London, wine-merchant—July 6, J. 11. Browne, Clapham, Surrey, linen-draper----July 13, W. 'lvens, Flecknoe, Warwickshire, grazier—July . l3, M. Ivens, Catesby, Nor thamptonshire, grazier—July 10, R. liligh, Bishop Aucklard, Dur ham, surgeon—July 7, T. Stanley, Leeds, manufacturer—July G. W. B. Allen, Clapton, Somersetshire, tanner—July 6, W. Wells, Not tingham, paper-dealer—July 17, S. Morris, Cheltenham, builder— July 7, O. Hustler, llalsted, Essex, scrivener—July 9, J. Robinson, Tenbury, Worcestershire, scrivener—July 7, A. Jones and J. Foyster, Halsted, Essex, rihand-manufacturers—July 8, J. Jones, Penllwyn mill, Monmouthshire, miller. • CERT' FC ATES To he granted, unless cause be shown to the contrary on or before the 3d day of July. S. Palmer, Coventry, draper—J. Bowerman, Oxford, chemist—J. Balleny, Tynemouth, Northumberland, farmer—H. Hoar, London, Irish imen-factor--W. li. Dakira, Higham, Norfolk, innkeeper. THE LIVERPOOL STANDARD. THEATRE•ROYAL, LIVERPOOL The Public is respectfully informed that Mr. CHARLES KEMBLE, of the Theatre-Royal, Covent-garden, is en gaged for Five Nights, and will make his second appearance this evening. Last Night but Three of Miss JOSEPHINE CLIFTON, of the New York Theatre, and the Theatres-Royal, Drury lane and Covent-garden, who is engaged for a Fortnight. rir 11-11 S present TUESDAY, the 16th instant, will be per- X formed the favourite Play of THE STRANGER. The Stranger Mr. Charle emble. Mrs. Haller.... Miss Josephine' ifton. At the end of the Play, a Pas de Deu , y Mr. J. Ridgway and Mademoiselle Marie. A Comic nce, by Messrs. 'l'. Ridgway and F. Jonas. TO conclude with the popular new Drama of • • RURAL FELICITY. TO-MORROW, (Wednesday,) for the BENEFIT of Miss JOSEPHINE CLIFTON, the Comedy of MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. Benedict, Mr. Charles Kemble. Beatrice, Miss Josephine Clifton.—A variety of Dancing.— To conclude with CLARI. Clari, Miss Josephine Clifton. 011 THURSDAY next ROMEO AND JULIET. Mer cutio, Mr. Charles Kemble. Romeo, by a Gentleman. his fist appearance on any stage. , Juliet, Miss Josephine Clifton. On FRIDAY next Mr. CHARLES KEMBLE'S BENE FIT, and the Last Night of his engagement. Lower Boxes 45.; Upper Boxes 3s. 6d.; Pit 2s. 6d.; Gallery Is. Places may be taken of Mr. Parker, at the Box-otlice, from Ten till Three o'clock. ASTRONOMY. M R. e W n t t l t e L m K e n E R a n r d es t h e c a n i n n oun c e e s r t t t h e n t L i a , i d s i ad - TURES on ASTRONOMY and .lEft e i Publi 3S ATION will be continued only Three Night's longer; and at on THURSDAY EVENING next, the 18th instant, will po ively be Delivered the Last Lecture in this town. Doors open at Seven o'clock each E fling, to commence at Half-past Seven o'clock. Tickets and Syllabuses to be had of Mr. CANNEL!, Castle street, and of Mr. CaApEr., Church-street; where a Treatise on Navigating the Air, with perfect steerage, by mechanical means, by Mr. WALKER, may be , had, price is. TO CORRESPONDENTS. The space occupied by the corporation reform bill totally pre vents us from availing ourselves of the contribution§ of seve ral esteemed correspondents before Friday. 'Cie Eiberpool ~E:tanbarb. TUESDAY MORNING, JUNE 16, 1835. Our parliamentary report, owing to the space occu pied by the municipal corporation bill, is to-day more than usually brief. The negro slavery emancipation act Was on Friday night the subject of some conversa tion in both houses of parliament. In the upper house, Lord BROUGHAM stated that of the thirty thousand slaves in the Mauritius, the greater part had been im ported after the passing of the act prohibiting that trade, and therefore that the present owners of these slaves were not entitled to any relief under the compensation act. In the commons, Mr. FOWELL BUXTON gave notice that on Tuesday (this day) he would bring forward a motion to suspend the payment of the twenty millions on the grounds that the conditions stipulated,. for in favour of the negroes had not been complied with. Mr. BUXTON also referred to the slaves illegally imported into the Mauritius, and contended that no compensation ought to be awarded for them. Sir GEORGE GREY re plied, with reference to the Mauritius, that the slaves imported into that colony had, together with the whole mass of slaves, become apprentices, and that the com pensation for them now stood on a different foundation. With this answer Mr. BUXTON expressed himself much dissatisfied: That an attempt would be made to defraud the planters of the money agreed to be paid to . ..them for their emancipated slaves we never had a doubt. Mr. BUXTON'S motion will, perhaps, remind our readers of the quarrel between the wolf and the lamb, who chanced to be slaking their thirst at the same stream i— where a predisposition to quarrel exists, a pretext for quarrelling is very easily found. Our attention has been called to the members of the committee appointed by Mr. POULETT THOMSON to take into considCration the duties on timber and to re port their opinions thereupon to the house." . It consists of thirty-two members, twenty-four of whom are well known to entertain the most decided opinions on the subject—opinions in favour of the Baltic and foreigners, and opposed to the trade at present carried on by British shipowners between this country and our North American colonies. The object that Mr. POULETT Tame:mop; has in view may be conjectured when we mention that Mr. WARBURTON, Mr. GROTE, Mr. LABOUCHERE, Mr. HUTT, Mr. ROEBUCK, and Mr. EWART, are members of the com mittee, and that Lord SANDON, Lord FRANCIS EGERTON, and Mr. MATHIAS ATTWOOD, are excluded. Lord SAN DON, we understand, is to call the attention of the house to the subject. If ever there was a packed jury in the world this is one. Our colonial trade can have no chance l in such hands. Why, it is notorious that Mr. WARBUR TON owns large forests on the shores of the Baltic, and is deeply concerned in promoting his own interests at the expense of the British shipowner, and the colonists and owners of property in Canada. Surely if there had been any regard for decency or impartiality, the name of Mr. WARBURTON would have been omitted. If the trade of the country is thus to be placed at the mercy of so many interested speculators and senseless visionaries, no man of property . is safe for asingle hour. There will be a petition from Liverpool on the subject in a few days, and we fruit the strongest and most urgent remonstrances will be made. Often have the columns of this paper been the channels of earnest appeals to the protestant . subjects of King WILLIAM the FOURTH. We have cried aloud against the degrading errors of Romanism—we have laid bare the cold heresies of Socinian introduction, we have warned every friend of order against the hydra-headed monster of dissent, and it has even been our painful duty to admonish those who minister at the sanctuary, but we certainly were not prepared for such an attack upon the church of our fathers as we have now before us from the pen of an archdeacon of that church. We allude to a handbill purporting to be Archdeacon Glover's Letter to the Very Reverend the Dean of Nor wich on the Church Altablz'shment. It has seldom fallen to our lot to read language on sacred matters which partakes so little of apostolical soberness as this precious document. The enemies of the church at the present moment are unquestionably the confederate band of papists and schismatics ; but her impregnable. fortress would be proof against even the apprehension of danger had she not traitors within the camp. ,Such men as Archdeacon (!) GLOVER and the Rev. Doctor WADE, and others whom we forbear to mention, as being less 1 , conspicuous in the impious work—these are the men who, holding sweet dalliance with th 6 enemy, are pre pared at any moment to betray the citadel. It shall arise from no faulty negligence on our part if these " hirelings, whose own • the sheep are not," be suffered any longer to hide their malignant features of treachery and anarchy under the vitiated and spurious mask of a christian charity and regard for the opinions of others. Now to our work. The occasion of the manifesto before us seems to have had its rise in the Dean of Norwich having requested Dr. GLOVER to lend his countenance to an address, praying the King to withstand an alienation of the re venues of that branch of our church which is situated in the sister island. This he refuses to do, and proceeds to allege certain reasons for this conduct. He begins by informing us that he considers warm professions of loyalty and duty in times like the present are " cruel snares" to beguile the King, and are especially " ill timed and mischievous." Is that a " snare" which would preserve the King from a violation of his sacred oath ? Is that " ill-timed" which is calculated to avert the downfall of the church ?. Is that " mischievous" which would secure to us our temples for the true worship of the living GOD ? Away with such trash ! We stay not now to quarrel with the archdeacon for the mournful paean which he sings over the late appeal to the nation ; we wait not to show the shuffling manner in which this guide talks of the PEEL and MELBOURNE-O'CONNELL administration; we will, however, answer the folloWing question in connexion with the recent dissolution of parliament. He asks, " What has been the result ?" We reply, a mighty triumph of truth over error. Give us but such another de feat and then, whiglings, retire to your owls' nests and hide in their native darkness your diminished heads. A contemporary has alluded to the spirit of this letter by quoting a passage showing the love of pelf exhibited by the writer: We proceed to detect and expose a base falsehood. We are gravely told that "it is from the state that our church revenues, as protestantS, were derived." Not so fast, reverend sir. Know you not that the church of Rome is, and was at the time of the reformation, an apostate church—apostate from. the faith of the early christians- apostate from the faith of the donors of vast portions of their ecclesiastical property ? If you are not cognizant of the fact, it is high time you should be. Go, reverend sir, to . your study, consult the " monastic re cords" of which you so sneeringly speak, show'a:better acquaintance with the legal tenure of our church pro perty, and do not again insinuate that the promulgation of an anti-christian idolatry and atheism was the object and intent of these endowments, which you , are anxious to see answered. The archdeacon now proceeds to say " The church of Ireland is an entirely different and isolated question. It is so widely separated from the church of England, both in character and usefulness, that it is idle to represent them, except for the purposes of party, as linked toge ther." We do not trust ourselves with furnishing the answer to this extraordinary statement. We gladly bor row language from one who, being also an archdeacon, has not partaken of the base leaven of anti-christian liberality, and is not prepared to hand over his church to the demoniacal and infuriate band of its belea guering enemies. We allude to the charge delivered to his clergy in the present year by the Rev. and Vene rable Archdeacon WILKINS-a charge not unworthy of his former protests against prevalent errors in religious opinion. Speaking of the Irish church, be thus writes:— " That branch is an integral part of our establishment. The church of which we are ministers is the united church of Eng. land and Ireland. The laws of the one are the statutes of the other—the churches are so identified with each other as to form two separate parts of one and the same establishment, and if it be just to spoliate the one, it, is equally so to weaken and despoil the other." Here we have a clear statement of a simple truth- 7 -a statement worth ten thousand such instances of the petitio princzpii as is exhibited in the weak and enve nomed letter of which we are now writing. We much question if there be any other instance on record of so flagrant a desertion of protestant duty,as is exemplified in this letter to the Dean of Norwich.' We have here a man who has not ` only professed and sworn his own attachment to the articles of our pure faith, but one whose duty it is to see that others do not make light of their pastoral charge ; we have, in short, a dignitary invested with high and authoritative functions telling the world that no religion ought to be the established religion, unless it be of the form professed by the ma jority. Here is, indeed, an awful exemplification of the stifling of the vox Dei by the maddened cry of the vox populi. We have here an unblushing assertion of the novel and dangerous dogma, that "the power of protes tantism to do good should vary inversely as the power of popery to do evil,"—a dogma so monstrous that we trem ble for our nation when we see it sanctioned by a digni tary of our church. • Once let this be the tenure of protestant existence, and we may soon expect to hear the fiendish accents of popish .rebels exclaiming, that there lives not a single protestant in Ireland ! For as in the memorable massacre contemplated by the papists in 1605 and 1678,\ so now would they not hesitate to involve spi ritual foes and friends in one common massacre rather than that any of the former should escape—ai in the Jew ish history we read that HEROD slew even his own son lest the promised MESSIAH should escape alive. For in the proceedings of the Irish papists we cannot fail to re cognize a conspiracy formed for the subversion of our nation and religion. Their object and that of their arch leader seems to be the acquiren , tent of an infamous cele brity by the immolation of their King and country to the fury of a licentious rabble ; and while destruction is spreading his sable wings over the land from verge to verge of the horizon, and sweeping the scattered elements of social happiness into one mouldering mass of death, then—aye, even at that moment when desolation bath done its deadliest work, and the state of. things is such that even sin and death might flee to hide themselves in chaos for horror at their own work—then it is that the great agitating curse of Ireland will himself rise on this fearful platform of his own construction, and stand forth as the conspicuous monument of 'protestant annihilation and popish ascendancy. Such is the character of those men in accordance with whose views Dr. GLOVER tells us we should sacrifice our church. The Irish branch of our church is to be lopped off' because some people have an " hereditary avers'oa" to it. Carry this argument out, and we shall then pronounce religion a fable, and christianity in compatible with the present advanced state of intellec tual research. Is there not reason for wonder that we should still be asked to concede to our Romish brethren, after the total failure for any good purpose of what we have already yielded. We have admitted them to a civil equality; are we to wash away the spiritual landmarks ? Instead of the calm which was to follow popish eman cipation, the same boisterous euoroelydon has risen again upon our coasts, and seems to 'threaten to sink this kingdom deeper than ever in the gulph of misery. For such is the disposition of men whose delight it is to be always uppermost, like mire in troubled waters, that nothing is a greater eye-sore to them than a last- ing peace. Now follows a deal of stupid ribaldry about deans and chapters, which is so unworthy the name of argu ment, and so derogatory to the character of him who wrote it, that we content ourselves with a bare allusion. The story about the Carfax clergyman reminds us of one BEVERLEY, who, being notorious as a reckless character while at the University, and celebrated as the subsequent object of several public castigations, thought to add to his celebrity by bedaubing Alma Mater with his slimy filth, thinking to prove Cambridge gene rally corrupt, by telling us that himself and associates were a disgrace to human nature. So with Archdeacon GLOVER; he does not tell us whether this hurried ser vice was not at his own request ; he does not inform us whether he had been an instrument in the hands of the devil for the corruption of this Carfax clergyman. But he tells us that there was no service in the church on „some particular evening, and that he acqnlirSted in this omission. Upon this gratuitous assertion of his own connivance at evil he grounds an unjust argument with respect to the Irish church, an argument base in itself, but ten thousand times baser from having its origin in ribald nonsense. But though we thus treat futile and absurd argument, we cannot allow a writer who pre fixes reverend to his name to utter falsehoods with im punity. We are told that "parliament has for a long series of years 'voted protestant money for catholic pur poses." When ? What money ? The assertion is 'false ; must we be compelled to add, wilful:y false ? Parliament • has voted money to general .purposes; but the public money comes from general sources. Taxes are paid by catholics as well as protestants, and it is from the taxes that Maynooth and similar grants are made. But evn were this not a lie in the outset, it is false that it has been done without a "religious outcry." The illustration of the "poor beggar" is meagre and puerile in the extreme, and wholly inca pable of application in the case of robbing the revenues of a protestant ecclesiastic establishment. Neither is the reference to the,Lancastrian schools of any weight. Their positive influence is still matter of dis pute. For our own part we arc inclined to look upon them as engines which, unless very judiciously watched, . will still add to the vast scheme of guilt in which this . ination seems involved. We admit the "rapid," but we altogether deny the "safe" increase of knowledge. We again borrow from the valuable charge of Arch deacon WILKINS, to which we have already alluded, in order to answer the oft-repeated nonsense about the reve nues of the protestant church being "wrested," &c.:— " It must be remembered," says Dr. Wilkins, "that this pro perty not only devolved, by the law of inheritance, from one to the other, but was also confirmed by the 'act of reformation, and that although to the measure of the uniou of the two countries . . he catholics were favourable and the protestants adverse, yet both agreed that the one legislature should yield to the other its separate rights, or as the act itself expresses it, 'the union of the churches of England and Ireland shall be deemed to be essential, and taken to be a fundamental part of the union.' Now, although in this compact no condition was made against the removal of the civil disabilities of the people, there was a very specific stipulation for the retention of the whole church property; so that it is impossible to divert any portion of it (ex clusively given in trust for the maintenance of our religion) to any purpose not strictly in accordance with it, without at once violating the principle of the trust so committed to the protest ant church, and the principle upon which the union of the two countries is founded. The great bulk of the landed property in Ireland is the property of the. protestants, and although the occupiers of it are chiefly catholics, yet the tithe which they pay, and which their labour produces, is claimed from the land lord as a deduction from the rent ; so that, its point of fact, the burthen is not imposed upon the occupiers, but on the owners of landed property, who, whether protestants or catholics, know and acknowledge that the tenth part of the land is not theirs, BUT BELONGS OF RIGHT TO THE CHURCH ITSELF." But we must in mercy stay our pen; and, in conclusion, thank Archdeacon GLOVER for referring us to the "faith of our primithe founders." By that faith we are con tent to stand. They bled for our hearths and altars— they were massacred by popish fiends—they felt the hor rors of the inquisition, the torments of the rack. They saw and exclaimed against that creed, by which he is declared the greatest saint who is the most expeditious suicide. They did not, as . did the papists, retire to the cloister, in order the more readily to deform virtue, nor did they be take themselves to the schools to mistify faith. To our "primitive founders" we look back with grati_ tude. We praise and bless GOD for having enabled them to strike off the fetters of Romish superstition, and to loose themseles from the manacles of papal bondage. And while we thus praise and bless GOD for the past, we look to him for help in the time to come. And if we look and pray faithfully for this, we may safely and boldly say, let the sons of Belial conspire and contrive what they please—let the covetous priests build seven altars and add seven more to them, and let theth offer upon every one seventy times seven bullocks, and as many rams, masses, relics, candles, posts, and what they please— let them lay their crafty heads together, aye, even call up the ministers of Pandemonium to their consultation— let them prepare every torture, and summon to their aid every rebel apostate, and we can still exclaim, all is vain, for "He that sittetli in the heavens will laugh. The LORD shall have them in derision, he shall speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure." We have done with this Archdeacon GLOVER, and to all those who like repasts, fit only for the furies, we say, feed still on the lacerated entrails of your distracted church, but beware—" The day of retribution is at hand." From a list of about three hundred notices of motions, entered in the books of the House of Commons last week, we select the following as curiosities. Mr. Buckingham—bill for authorising the constitution of courts of honour, as tribunals for the adjudication of those dis putes now commonly decided by an appeal to arms; with a view to provide a competent substitute for the absurd, murderous, and unchristian practice of duelling. Mr. 'wart—address to the crown in favour of the appoint ment of peers for life. Colonel Evans--To draw the attention of the house to the in convenience and dangers of the late assumption of the diff.rent offices and powers of the state by the Duke of Wellington being liable to be drawn into a precedent. Mr. W. S. O'Brien--in committee on the bill for the franchisement of the borough of Stafford, to move, that the pri vilege of sending two members to parliament be transferred from the borough of Stafford to the county of Cork. Mr. Waklev—to move that an humble address be presented to the King, praying that his Majesty will be pleased to grant a pardon to, and direct the recal of the six Dorsetshire labourers, who were convicted at the assizes held at Dorchester in the spring of 1834, on a charge of having taken an oath which was not required by law, and who were thereupon sentenced to trans portation for the term of seven years. Air. F. Maule—bill for relief of the tenants and occupiers of land in Scotland horn the damages done to their crops by hares; pheasants, and rabbits. Mr. Grantley Berkeley—to move that a portion of the stran gers' gallery be set apart for the accommodation of the ladies. Mr. Ewart—select committee, to inquire into the best means of extending a knowledge of the arts and of the principles of de sign among the people (especially among the manufacturing population) of the country; and also to inquire into the consti tution of the Royal Academy, and the effects produced by it. Mr. Ewart—re-appointment of select committee on the claim of Baron de Bode. Mr. Buckingham—bill to authorize the purchase of land for the purpose of making public walks, gardens, and places of public recreation in the open air in the neighbourhoods of all towns, for the use of the population generally. Mr. Buckingham—bill to authorize the erection of public in stitutions, to embrace the means of diffusing literary and sci entific information, and forming libraries and museums, in all towns, for the use of the inhabitants of the same. Mr. Andrew Johnson—address for copies of communications from the parishioners of Kirkmichael, county of Ayr, received by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, respecting the recent appointment of a minister to that parish, and of his answers to the same. Mr. Sharman Crawford—copies of any reports from the ma gistrates, or officers 'bf the constabulary, to his majesty's go vernment, with reference to riotous proceedings which lately took pace in the village of Ballykelly, parish of Tamlaghfin lagan, and county of Londonderry. Mr. Ewart—(in committee of supply) on the vote for educa tion in the estimates, to submit to the house the propriety of en couraging the formation of public libraries in towns, open to all classes of the community. In the above will be found no less than four motions or intended motions, by our very sagacious representa- tive, Mr. WILLIAM EWART. The honourable member, it seems, is in favour of life-rent peers whose honours and titles shall die with them. He is, we suppose, con vinced that talent is not hereditary; perhaps he has proof of this in his own person; and he is anxious that the HOWARDS, PERCYS, and GROSVENORS should be placed on the same level with the EwARTS. But might not the member for Liverpool carry his scheme a little farther, and thereby increase the utility of its operation ? Why not move for leave to bring in a bill to compel every per son who aspires to a seat in the House of Commons to p►oduce testimonials that lie has learnt to read and write, that he can behave like a gentleman, and that he has some knowledge of the etymology and definitions of the English language ? This, in our humble opinion, would be a much more wholesome reform, and a more beneficial measure. As we do not know what Mr. EWART means, in his second motion, by "extending the principles of design among the people," we pass it by for the present in order to reach that which has reference to the "formation of public libraries in towns, open to all classes of the corn- munity." We confess we did not knew until now that there were any towns in England and Scotland in which there are no libraries "open to all classes of the community." But supposing this to be the case, what is the reason ? If there be a town where there is no library, would it not be well to inquire, before a library is established,whether the people" can read. Every Englishman cannot boast of the advantages which Mr. EWART has derived from educe. tion ; and we presume that the absence of libraries can only be accounted for upon the assumption that books are not indispensable where the schoolmaster has not yet been. But why establish public libraries at all ? Would it not be equally wise to establish shops for the distribution of ginger beer in hot weather, " open to all clases of the community ?" The good subjects of the King who sell, and make a living by selling that spicy and fermented water, (which by the way is so much like some members of parliament,) would not like to see a public pump for the free distribution of ginger beer. They would be apt to exclaim, "The parliament has taken the bread out of our mouths!—the parliament has reduced us to pau perism!—the parliament has sent our wives and children to the workhouse!—the wisdom of the wise has been our ruin!" There are many persons too, who in various towns obtain their livelihood from their stock in trade of books, which they call circulating libraries. Some of these per sons, we are inclined to believe, voted for 111 r. EwAnT at the last election. But what would they say if their trade was intruded upon by parliamentary rivals, and their customers inundated with books obtained free of all charge, and " open to all.classes of the community ?" Would they not think that parliament was interfering with their means of subsistence, and depriving them of their property ? It is lamentable to see the time and the books of the House of Commons wasted and disgraced by such con temptible absurdities. To see men who are supposed to have arrived at the years of discretion bringing forward motions which would bring disgrace on a schoolboy, is a sad reflection on the march of intellect. Legislation on panning tops—legislation on mouse traps—legislation JUNE 16, 1835. on poor lads calling "sweep" in the streets, was per haps worthy of the first reformed parliament ; but we contend that it is unworthy of any set of men having the slightest pretensions to the character of British states men. We wish some respectable and intelligent radical would read Mr. EWART a lecture on these matters. If he or the House of Commons have any funds to spare for the benefit of the people, let them give the people bread, bacon, and beer. Before they begin with libraries, let them feed the hung r y an d c l o th e th e na k e d . B e f ore t h ey • pamper the middle classes with nonsensical books, with the fooleries of the political economists, with the trashy writings of Lord BROUGHAM, or with the magazines and Melanges of simpering pantaloons and literary thimble riggers, let them give food to the poor man, and increase the comforts of the labourer. We have too many books, such as they are, already. Education as it is pursued in too many instances already, is a curse rather than a bles sing-to the working classes, and it is pernicious in the highest degree when conferred, as is too much the case, without the appliances and influences of pure religiort. But we take leave of Mr. EWART, and turn to a mem ber who is Called SHARMAN CRAWFORD. This worthy gentleman has a motion on the books relative to certain " riotous proceedings which lately took place in the village of Ballykelly, parish of Tamlaghtfinlagan, and county of Londonderry." There reader ! read that mo tion, but be careful of your jaws. The whole matter is .an Irish row in an obscure village, in which no doubt some descendant of a Milesian king has broken the head or shins of some other person of similar descent, and yet this cannot be allowed to pass, or be settled by the local magistrates, without eliciting a long string of unintel. ligible speeches in the House of Commons. Gracious powers ! are these matters worthy the attention of a British parliament ? Are there not five hundred ques tions of ten thousand times more importance which de mand investigation and adjustment, and the consideration of which is postponed in consequence of a riot in the village of Ballykelly, parish of Tanilaghtfinlagan, and county of Londonderry ? 0 wise age ! beautiful states men ! precious patriots ! In short it is only necessary to glance at the several motions to be assured of their silliness and absurdity. Mr. BUCKINGHAM proposes to establish "courts of ho nour" to prevent duelling. Mr. Fox MAULE is to bring in a bill to relieve "tenants and occupiers of land in Scotland from the damages done to their crops by hares, pheasants, and rabbits." Why not snails and grubs, beetles and caterpillars, rats and mice ? Bless the man ! does lie not know that tenants take their lands subject to the injury done to their crops by rabbits as well as rats ? It would seem not. What a legislator ! One Mr. O'BRIEN is to move that the right of returning members to parliament in the borough of Stafford be transferred, of all places in the world, to the county of Cork ! Why Cork ? Why not Derrynane Abbey at once ? But we are sick of the subject. We regret to observe that Lord STANLEY, without being challenged, has taken the field against conserva tive associations. The noble lord will, by and by, per haps have a/ much cause to regret this as we do now. Most of our readers know that one of these societies has recently been formed for the northern division of this county, and in a long letter to Sir THOMAS HESKETII, published in the Preston Pilot, Lord STANLEY " &pre- cates" the institution. He says:— " I do not deny that the present is a period at which great nterests are at stake : I do not deny that the reform bill itself, necessary as I believe that measure to have been, and called for by the deliberate opinion of the country, may have had tbo effect of stimulating the desire of political change, and of excit- ing in men's minds an overweening anxiety for alterations in our institutions, and an unreasonable expectation of advantages to be derived therefrom. I am far from denying that to correct such exaggerated expectations, to reason away such overstrained desires—nay, even to expose the sophistries of ignorant or mischiev ous quack doctors in politics, who impose upon the ill-informed by persuading them that the benefit to be derived must be commensu rate with the strength of the dose administered—may become the duty of those whom Providence has placed in a station to give them the means of forming a more dispassionate judgment, and the influence to add weight to that judgment on the minds of others. But that such objects may be most beneficially pro moted by an organization of clubs and corresponding societies; that such organization, though it were compelled by an ovei whelming necessity, can be productive of even partial good without entailing at least corresponding evils of fearful magni tude, I do, for my own part, utterly disbelieve." We much question the "deliberate opinion" here al luded to, but n'importe ; his lordship proceeds : " Against what are you defending yourselves? Are you united for the purpose of protecting your principles and the representatives of your principles against some dangerous coun ter-organization occupied in disseminating republican doctrines, in weakening the prerogatives of the crown, in nnderminingthe independent character of the House of Lords, in controlling the freedom of the House of Commons ? If such general orga nization there be in North Lancashire, I have lived in as igno rance of it which I do not wish disturbed." Lord STANLEY asks, with some apparent earnestness,— " against what are you defending yourselves ?" We will tell him. Perhaps Lord STANLEY has some faint recollection of a powerful and menacing association called the Birmingham union, which has ceased to exist, not from any reaction of spirit, but from the want of funds, or rather from the dishonesty of its members, who have become involved in debt which they either cannot or will not pay. Now, if Lord STANLEY have any re collection of the Birmingham and other political unions,- he can hardly fail to remember that the conservative associations were formed to counterbalance the influence of the unions. They have succeeded in all those places where they have ripened into or near to maturity. But for these profligate unions we believe, most conscienti ously believe, that the conservative associations never would have been called into existence. And who patronised the unions ? Not Lord STANLEY, perhaps, but the government of which Lord STANLEY was a mem ber. Lord ALTHORP and Lord JOHN RUSSELL were cor- . responding members of the Birmingham union. Earl GREY'S franks were used in hundreds to promote its object. Lord BROUGHAM secretly- worked with them through a sly unitarian attorney, JOSEPH PARSES by name. In short, the unions formed what was afterwards termed the " pressure from without'a pressure origi nally given from within. Ministers made the giant which they subsequently found they could not controul. But at that period did we hear any, eloquent depreca tions come from the lips of Lord STANLEY ? Did he write letters to Binningharft - condernting unions, - and inferentially condemning his -colleagues ? No, -no ; they were then as useful to Lord STANLEY as they were to Lord GREY and Lord JOHN RUSSELL. They were the cat's-paw of the day ; the auxiliaries of reform. Possibly we shall be told by some of the noble Lord's friends that, as the Birmingham union is defunct, it is impolitic to establish conservative associations. Stop a bit, worthy friend. The political unions are only nomi nally defunct; they survive in all their deformity in the shape of trades unions, which are political and secret clubs of the most monstrous kind, the members of which are bound by oaths, and who do not even stop at assassi nation to accomplish their purposes. But Lord STANLEY is pleased to observe, "if such general organization there be in North Lancashire, I have lived in an ignorance of it which I do not %visit disturbed." But his lordship's ignorance must be dis turbed. The " wish" here, we suspect, is not the father of the thought. If Lord STANLEY be ignorant of the fact, his is culpable and unpardonable ignorance. There is not a town—there is hardly a village in England, in which there is not a trade's union; and the members of these unions, almost to a man, vote against conservative interests and in favour of levelling and destructive can didates. Who returned ATTWOOD and SCHOLEFIELD Birmingham ? The political union. Who returned EW ART for Liverpool, THORNELY for Wolverhampton,• WAKLEY for Finsbury, and many others ? The trades unions. Who did return the king's attorney-general for Dudley but the trades' unior. of that-town, under the dis play of the tri-coloured flag, the hated emblem of revo lutionary France—the emblem of sacrilege, plunder and assassination? Lord STANLEY must therefore permit us to tell him that similar unions exist in many parts of the, important district which he represents in parliament, and that it is to resist arid neutralize their power that the ,conservative. 3 I mi5r....... axsocia for th be fou ever, i Two during 'ranee, was 9 ' 4 closing is very. Bills E extreii latter En c extren the Sc at 151 86k, a Colum Dutch Louis; Lake North Arkar Texas Mobil Florid Georg -*tooth North Virgil C rop i TO 181 Louisi Lake, North Arkar Texas Mobil Florid Georg South North Virgi) To m shoe Atli To ar To .ar To ar Total Detici ...... r • 11." - ' Agree will Conti' Consu Leave Allow We public nsq., his du seqiii I tome] Water ruatte Mona'