The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1835-08-21 00:00:00

- e=rgs CROWN COURT, W EDNESDAY. THROWING VITRIOL. • . Ann Marrow was indicted for having on the 18th of April fe loniously wounded Samuel Wade, of this town, by throwing a sabarter of a pint of vitriol npon and over the face and eyes of hide, the said said .Satenel Wade, with intent to maim, disfi, gu.e. or disable him, or to do him some grievous bodily harm. Nlr. Ht.l.roN appeared for the,prosecution, and stated the Case to the effect that Mr. Samuel Wade was a merchant re aiding in Liverpool. He had employed a great number of wo men formerly in his business, but in consequeuce of a fire - which took place, some time ago, he was under the. necessity of disehargieg a great number of them, and amoogst the rest the who had been in his employment for a considerable time. The ptisoner had called upon. Mr. Wade sever-al times, and had requested hiin to receive her into his employmeut, but be was unable to comply with her request. It would be proved by the evidence that on the - 18th April the prisoner had pur- Cfiated .a qUahtity of sulphuric acid, commonly called. oil of vi triol, at the shop or a . druggist iu this town • she had then gone to the office of Mr.. Wade; and waited fur him outside. When hN came put hbe a:sked hitii to take her hack into his service. Ile had 'Put his hand into his; pocket and was about to give her a Milling., when she 'teirnediately threw the vitri u l in his face. . Salaue - 1 Wade sworn.—Witness said he was a cotton dealer in Liverpool. His Office was iu Rumford-street. The prisoner was in his employment for many years. In December lust there was a fire on the, premises, , in consequence of which he was un der the necessity ,of discharging a number of .his servants, the prisener amongst the rest. Saw the prisoner several times af ter that, on occasions when she applied to him for work... She Icid called at his office on the 19th March last.. In consequence of her conducrat that time he was under the necessity of send ing for a police ()Weer, into whose custody he delivered her, and she was subsequently brought before the magistrates on his charge. Witness appeared against her, at that time, and she was 'sent to prisim in coniequence. After this he did not see her for some months. On the IBth of . April, himself and a voUng man of his, saw her standing opposite to his office, at about four o'clock in the' afternoon. Saw her again shortly af terwards Still standiug there, but did not speak to her. At a ((barter past eight o'cltick he left his office. Went past, the Town Hall in the direction of Cattle-street, at which time he heard quick footsteps behind him, upon which he turned his bead and saw the prisoner following after him at a quick pace. The lamps were lighted and he could see her distinctly. Pre- - , sintly he heard th e p r is o n er a dd ress i ng hi m i n a most bland, and mild tone. She said, " Mr. Wide, will you please to give me two-pence to buy my breakfast in the morning." Witness turned a little but continued to walk on. He put his ,hand itito his pocket'and said, here is a shilling for you. Ile was about to add, "hut I hope, what you have undergone will have the effect of causing you to amend your way of life." Ile had uttered, however, but the first two words "ot this sentence, when something was thrown over his face.which cause4'him ex eructating torture and almost drove hint into a state of madness. It was liquid. The prisoner was then about a yard or a yard and a'half from him. He could not observe afterwards, the pain havingrendered hitn incapable almost of thought, noralid he see what became of the prisoner. . Ile immediately ran with all his speed towards the shop of Mr. Butler, the duggist, Calling out with all his might thLt he was ruined, some one having thrown vitriol in his Vice. lie became quite blind, but some person, he could not tell whon, took hold of him, and led him to Butter's shop. He had seen his . hat and coat stn e e , an d was sore that the injuri es th e y evide nced were done by the liquid which was thrown upon him. The judge here informed the pri soner that she might put any questions she thou g h t proper to the witneiss. The prisoner said she wished to ask the witness how he had behaved to her in December last. The, learned judge hnmanely recommeuded her, if this question related to any by-gone dispute, not to put it, as it would prejudice her case. • Richard Edwards depOsed that he was a resident in Liver pool: On Saturday, the 18th Antal, 'was in E xc h a n ge - s t reet West, where he observed Mr. Wade running, shouting very badly, and the prisoner pursuing him. Observed the ; prisoner. She rail' close behind Mr. Wade and appeared tole thumping Man. She pursued hiM till he crossed Water-street. Prisoner dropped a shawl in Water -street. He (wituess) did not see any thing in her hand at this time. She returned for the shawl immediately. Witnhis asked het what 'was the matter. She replied that " the old s coun d re l had not suffered enough. " When she was reuniting for the shawl, immediately after hay ieg quitted Mr. Wade, witness observed'her liftin j er a cup to her face exaniining to see what i t cont ai ned. Cault# t say what sort of cep it was, but thought it was a coloured cup. She hoOd in her hand for a short time, and then thrOy h into the middle of the street. A person named RoSS, a coachman, came to the spot, and between them they took hold of the prisoner and led to the shop of Mr. Butler, druggist in Castle•street. There he found Mr. Wade, who was having his face dressed. He there asked the prisoner what had induced her to do such a thing, having been informed of the circumstance in the shop. She replied that the oirrviflain had not got half enough. Wit ness went back to the spot where he had ;seen the prisoner throw away the cup, but was unable to find More than two small frag ments of the handle of it. Johu Ross corroborated the eYidenee of the above witness. Mr. Heath, an assistant at th e s h o p o f M r . B ut l er, state d t h at he was in the shop on The 18th of April when Mr. Wade was led in: he had attended to him. Mr. Wade's face was quite wet and shining, as if it hid been smeared with oil. He found, on examining it, that it was covered with a corrosive milseral edict, which Was dropping frona'the nose, and streenaing deism the face, which seemed to be about three-parts Covered with the liquid. 're .the best of his knowledge and belief this-liquid . was sulphuric *Mid, 'commonly called oil of vitriol. Mr. Wade wits taken into the back shop, where magnesia and 'Water was ap plied to neutralize the acid, after which lime-water and linseed oil was made (ie of. The effect of the acid was te hum the skin. Mr. Wade's face was yeti' much blistered, and a midi quantity of skin adhered to and came off with the lint which was applied saturated with the remedies. A surgeon was sent for, who arrived in about twenty minutes. Blistering was gene ral over the face wherever the vitriol had been thrown; the upper part of the face, howeVer, was the worst. Mr. Manifold aaid h e Wars a'surgeon, and had been in practice twelve years. RerneMbered having been sent fur to Butler's shop oh the 18th 'April. When he arrived there, he foand Mr. Wade with his face covered. Witness removed the covering, and saw that Mr. Wade's fare was externally very much in flamed. Sulphuric acid, Or vitriol,is the most corrosive acid that can be applied to the skin. ' Mr. Wade was sent home. The effect of sulphuric 'acid applied to the skin would be to destroy it, The blisters were on the outer skin, and that was the comMenceinent of the destruction of it. It %amid take some time to destroy the whole of the texture of the skin. Cross-ex,rinmed by the JuonE.—lt is the natural conse quence of the applicatio n o f v i tr i o l to destroy the skin. Ile (ilir. Manifold) only attended Mr. Wade at first: he afterwards gave up the cure to Mr. Hicks, Mr. Wade's family surgeon. Same portion of the cuticle was destroyed, but the injury was not what he, as a surgeon, would call a wound: Mr. John 'Hicks said he was Mr. 'Wade's family surgeon, and had been inlartictice thirty years. O n th e n i g h t o f the 18th of April Mr. Wade had called upon him in a carriage at about half-past nine or ten o'clock. He accompanied him home, and examined his face. He was desirous of examining his eyes, but the face' was so swollen that he could not. The face was in flamed and blistered, but worse on the upper than the lower /art. The skin was destroyed by the blistering, and afterw ar d s cast off in' the shape of slou g h by aberration. This process took place in consequence of the apptication of some corrosive acid. The skin was eventually destroyed and sloughed off in about three or four days. Witness attended Mr. Wade for about a The Junrix.—At any time during your attendance was there what you would pronounce to be a wound on Mr. Wade's face? Witness.-•--Yes. JUDE.—Then your opinion as a surgeon is, that he had a wound? Witness.—Yes, aosuperficial wound. --- Jcuce.How would you define a wound? Witness.—A wound is the destruction of any part. jUnna.—Of any external part? Witness.— Y es. JeDGE.—W.: any external part destroyed in this case? Witness.—Yes. John Kershaw, an apprentice with Mr. Pleston, the drug gist, recollected that on the 18th of April the to their shop, and lia n a purchased a prisouer had come pennyworth of sulphuric acid, commonly called oil of vitriol, or 'vitriol. Witnesi served, her with it. "She received it in a tea-cup. It filled one-third of the cup. and might he about a quarter of a pint. William H. a etze, Police-officer, said that he was sent for to Butler's shop on the 18th of April, where he found the pri soner and Mr. Wade. The latter was given into his custody, and he - took her to Bridewell. On the was lie asked her what could have inducell her to commit such'an act. She replied, the old villain had charged her with setting his place on fire; him. She would take his life, if She had an apron on. r Witntss had a la rge h o l e burned in the at were burned in a similar way. ,rella were now produced by true was completely b urne d off. 't he al a great portion of the silk of thing in her defence, but handed ud ge. course of an elaborate charge to itend to pass sentence on the pri- Ity, as the law permitted ii doubt re to be referred to the 'decision ton of about ten minutes, pm. ;ainst.4. prisoner, 131111 Y. arbe, charged with having, at South port, ri; the 15th of July last, in the 'dwelling-house of Ralph Peters, Esq., feloniously stolen two bank notes for the pay. silent of five pounds each; one telescope, four pair of spectacles, one eye-ktass, three seals, one key, one ring, and a quantity of wearing apparel, the property °lathe said Ralph Peters. The case for the prosecution was conducted by Mr. Hutton. The facts of the case were as fellows:—On the 15th July, Mr. Peters went to bed at half-past eleven, leaving all safe. At half-past four o'clock in the morning he was called up, when he discovered that his study and strong box had both been broken open, and the articles above enumerated stolen. The cash box, rhich was of wood, was taken into the garden and broken open with a brick. John Webster, a police-officer of Southport, proved thatle had found a pair of shoes in the study which exactly fitted the prisoner. —A boatman on the Leeds and Liverpool canalstated that the prisoner had overtaken his veseel, at Lvdiate, cfn, its way to Liverpool, and requested permission to ride. which was accorded to halt, and when they arrived at Maghull, he had given witness a five -pound note to get changed, which was effected at the Red Lion public-house, from where witness took some drink on board the nat. The prisoner received the change from the note, and w h en they arrived at Chiseuhale-bridge he (the prisoner) got out, wanting witness to take the bundle toe certain public-house Which he named. The witness did as he was desired, but, in the mean time, an account of the robbery had reached Liverpool, and when the _prisoner called for his bundle he was taken int o custody by alalsall and Parkinson, police-officers, who conveyed him to bridewell. Mr. Peters identified the property, and stated that the prisoner had formerly been his contidantial servant for eleven months. The prisoner put in a written defence, to the effect that he bad been in great distress since be left the service of Mr. Peters, and the robbery was committed by a young man whom he had met on the road, who hail given flan the bundle to carry for him; he therefore begged the merciful consideration t4thejUdge. The jury found the prisoner gui!ty. The learned „judge informed the prisoner that lie had made an appeal for that which it was nofin his potter to grant. The prisoner was sentenced to be transported beyond the seas for the term of his natural life. Edward Afalfane was indicted, charged with having, it Man chester, feloniously put off twenty-eight counterfeit shillings, at a lower rate and value than the same, and by their denomina tion import. The case fer the mint was conducted bY,Serjeant Atcherley. It appeared by the evidence that a woman named Mary Radford, who was employed by the Manchester police to purchase counterfeit money. h;id seen the prisoner at different. times, and induced him to sell het several shillings, athoutiting in all to twenty-eight. Mary Radford, the principal witness hid paid the prisoner for the counterfeits in marked money-, which she had ',received. from Berwick and Green, two police officers of Manchester. She then gave .intbrmation to the latter, who took the prisoner into custody with the marked money in his possession. The prisoner, in his (ideate, said . uei but she would'yet dtp worse f o r h she sherlel he strong for it." SI here ptuslueeti the. apron; which front. 'the sleeve. of her gowi Mr. Wade's hat, coat, and unit,' witness. The trout of the hat w cost was much discoloured, and the umbrella clestrOyed.] , The ! ,, leoticr.did not say any t is a wiil t;.`lr stmtem era to the .1u ledriiert4utiGE, in the co the jury, said its the did not int saner in. ease slid was found guil as.to the caso, which would have of the j4.lw,s. • • The jury, after.. a deliberatic no:;:.crd a verdict of Guilty aga • ~ • - ROBBI George Canzrhe'l war indicted, THE LIVERPOOL STAN VA , . . that the woman liadford was a well-known infatoi.uscharacter at Manchester, and that she had given' him drink, and might thee have put the marked coin into his pocket. It wits the first time he had ever been brought before a court of jw,tice, and he hoped his sentence might be lenient. The jut:) , fotind the pri soner guilty, but. recommended hint to Mercy. The learned judge told the prisoner that the court was inclined, iii couse qoenee of his'own appal and - the "Merciful recominendation of the jury, to give him an, opportunity of ' amendixtent. The learned judge then sentenced the prisoner to be nnprisoned in Lancaster'Castle for twelve calm:Air Months. NISI PRIUS.-WEDNFSDAY, MORRIS "r. kAVEt4SCROFT. The plaintiff in this case was Mr. Valentine Morris, a wine " and spirit merchant at London; the defendant, an innkeeper at Manchester, and the action was brought to recover the sum of £tl3 17-4.8 d. for goods furnished. Mr. with whom was Mr. J. ADDISON, stated the case the to jury, and called th e 'following witnesses : • Charles Simpson was traveller to the plaintiff, and was in the habit of visiting tbis part of .the country, twice a-year,-viz, in April and Detober. In Ocidber, 1832, the defendant gave him an , order for half a bogsh'eid of port wine, half a 'hogshead of' sherry, and half a puncheon of brandy. He immediately.sent the order to London, and the wine and brandy Were despatched by the canal in one of Pickford's boats, On his next visit in April, 1833, the defendant paid for the brandy, but. refused ; to take the wine, which irithe meantime bad been lying at Pick ford's wharf. Defendant; on the 9th of April, signed an'agree ment engaging to take the wines on the following conditions: , —That a respectable merchant should be called on to fix the value ;• that if payment were not convenient, it should not be demanded till the next journey, and that the wine should be sent to Mr. Ravenscroft at once. (The agreement was here , put in and read.) Gave a copy of the agreement to defendant. Defendant then gave him an order in writing for a puncheon 'of rum then lying in bond in the London Docki, at 3s. Bdh per The defendant then agreed to remit the money for the duty (9s per gallon) in the customary manner, but did not do so. The runs still remained in the hands of the plaintiff. The contract for the rum was in writing; that for the wine and brandy was not. The value of the wine was £l9 per cask. In October, 1833, he called on defendant again, and expressed his surprise that defendant had not fulfilled his agreement either as to the wine or rum. Defendant said that lie had no objection 'to the wine himself, but his wife had, and would not allow him to take it into his stock. He wished some respec table person to be appointed to value the wine, but defendant objected. Made no agreement that a person named Patchett 'should decide the dispute. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant ATCHERLY. Was paid by salary, not by commission, or the amount of sales effected. 'Two or three days after the sale of wine in October, 1832, the defendant came to Min and wished to countermand the order. 'fold him it was too late, as the order had gone off, and the wine was probably on the road from London. Did not write to countermand it. in April following the defendant said he had not ordered the wine, but had countermanded it. Wished to persuade Ravenscroft to take the Wine, in order to prevent its being seized. Might have told defendant's wife that if she would persuade her husband to take the wine, she might go up to town and buy the handsomest dress she could find, and lie (witness) would pay for it. Might have Made_ such an offer, but did not remember the words.' Made it, because he knew the wife was manager of the house. Did not believe that he : had had any conversation with Mr. Patchett as referee, but would not swear that he bad not. The last he heard of the wine was, that it was still at Pickford's. The ruin was still at the bonded warehouse in London. In April, 1833, •the wine samples were sent back to his warehouse by defendants Did not sea them himself, but was told so by•the servant. •By the Junus.—The defendant had himself tasted the samples at the time when he signed the agreement to take the iamb. Did not know whether the wife tasted them also. Mr. Sergeant ATCHERLY, for the defendant, contended that his client had never ordered the goods, and was not bound to Pay for them. He called Mr. George Patchett, a wine and spirit dealer at Manchester, who stated that he had examined samples of the wine, which were sent to him by the defendant, and found it to be such stuff that he could not fix any value upon it. It. appeared, however, that this was in 1834, atter the wine had been lying at Pickford's for two years, and that Mr. Patchett very well knew that they were samples of the wine sent by . plaintiff, because the defendant's - wife told him so. The jury found for the plaintiff.—Damages £54105. THOMAS BARKER SMITU V. WIO,HAWKINS AND ANOTHER. This was an action to recover a balance of 4 or 5 years salary alleged to be due to the plaintiff, Mr. Thomas Barker Smith, formerly a schoolniaster ' io Cheshire, but now a bookkeeper, in Liverpool, from the defendants, Messrs. 'Wm. and Robert Hawkins; as executors of the late Mr. Hunter, Cabinet-maker, furniture broker, and dealer in rushes, who formerly carried on business in Stanley-street, in this town. The evidence princi pally relied on for the plaintiff, was a letter to him from the de ceased, dated 1829; of which the following is a copy :—" Cousin Smith,—come down to-morrow to assist me, and • I will give you £26 a-year." The plaintiff come to Liverpool in consequence, and was described by several persons as having remained in the service of Mr. Hunter, from that time, till Mr. Hunter's death, which happened towards the close of last year. It appeared that he attended at the shop' occasionally, sometimes for three or four days in 'the Week, at others, not for a month together, and 'was employed in. keeping the books, making out accounts add attending at the docks foy the purpose of landing rushes be longing to the deceased. The reason alleged for his not having drawn his salary regularly, was, that his wife was cousin to Mr. Hunter, and had some expectations from him, and that he . did not press for payment, lest those expectations should be disaitp pointed. Several witnesses were called to prove that the letter in question was in the hand-writing of the deceased. For the delence, other witnesses, who professed to be acquainted with his writing, deposed to their belief that it was not his. One of them, a banker's clerk, with w'hom Mr. Hunter had done busi ness; said that the writing was very like Mr.' Hunter's, whilst another swore that there was not the least resemblance. Lord As INGE R, in summing up the evidence, said that if the jury consid e r e d th e l e tt er f rom Mr. 'Hunter as having really been written by him, and believed the testimony of the witnesses, their verdict must be for the plaintiff, as no evidence had been adduced to show that any part of the salary* promised to the plaintiff had been paid to him, whilst they could only find for he defendant on the belief the letter in question had been for ged by the plaintiff. The jury retired to consider of their verdict. After being ab sent about half an hour, they returned with a verdict for th e plaintiff.—Damages £loo,—being the amount of four years' ea_ lary ' at the rate agreed on. Messrs. Crompton and Henderson were counsel foe the plain tiff :—Mr. Blackburn for the defendant. BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE.—WARING V. WALT.EY. • This was an action to recover damages for a breach of pro mise of marriage on the part of the defendant, a young lady .re cently married to • Mr. \Valley, a respectable wine and spirit merchant, of H ultne, near Manchester. The plaintiff is a book keeper in a merchant's counting-house in this town. The damages were laid at £I,OOO. Mr. VENABLES opened the pleadings, and Mr. ALEXANDER stagd the case. The learned counsel said that he did not won der at all at seeing an involuntary smile on the countenance of Mr. Venabies, when he mentioned that the present action was not brought by a lady, but by a gentleman; but he was not aware that any law existed which would deprive a person from seeking reparation for injuries sustained by a lady. This action was brought by the gentleman against the lady. The Jones—ls the action undefended by the lady? Mr. ALExaNnca.---Yes, my lord. (A laugh.) 3 , 1 r. ALEXANDER continued—lt might be aware occurrence to see an action for breach of promise of marriage hronght by the man, but he supposed that the fact was, that the softersex gene rally kept their words in such matters so well that it was seldom necessary. He should in this case be enabled to show that the defendant, after plighting her cows to the plaintiff, had so tar outraged his feelings that, about the time preparations were making far their marriage, she threw herself into the arms of another, and married him. The plaintiff was a mcst respectable Ton ng man, and bad been for some time acquainted with the de teudant in Preston, where her father followed the business of an innkeeper. It w as i n . th at town in 1.833 they first en g ag e d each others affections. In the hope of amending their mutual condition, the plaintiff left Preston, and obtained a situation as bookkeeper in a merchant's counting-house in Liverpool, which he was urged to do by Mrs. Walley. He had ever since re mained in that capacity, and Mrs. 'Walley, (then Miss Town send,) the defendant, had frequently been over to. Liverpool to see him, when the nuptials were spoken of to the mutual friends of both parties, and a house was about being taken for . them. As, however, the poet'said, " the course of true los'e ;ever did run smooth," Miss Townsend became enamoured of another °h ied in the person of - Mr. \Valley. He was . a much richer man than the plaintiff, and made his appearance about the close of December last year, w hen his client was sent to the right about, leaving him to seek a remedy the best,way he equld. •Iti Sep tember last his client was about taking a house with a view to marriage. A conjugal correspondence was carried on between the plaintiff and the female defendant from the mouth of March, 183-1, to the 3 , 1 of January, 1835, when she becaMe aequainted with her present hushand; who, in the very short space of one month, changed her affections so much that they were married on the 17th of February, 135, with a full knowledge of all her engagetnents with the. plaintiff The female defendant had a small expectancy on her father's death, which was probably the cause of the male defendant's marrying her to the diiadvantage of the plaintiff'. lie hid Mrs. \Valley's letters;. written wheal she was Miss Townsend, to the lilaintiff,.whieb would show uu what affectionate terms the parties were: The learned c(itiesel then reed : the ft?l,Latti lig letters, which excited confide rab laughter:— "Preston, Septarn her 27, 1834. "My ti , mr r Ediard,l received yours of the 22d, and would have writt.n much sooner if T had had an opportunity. I left Manchester on the Thursday; the same day you left •Ormskirk; you stayed longer there than you 'talked Of to me; 'I suppose if you had met me there_ your stay would h ave b een ver y s h or t to what it. was. Miss Walley and my cousin Ann, sister to her 'that wai w ith me a t Li verpoo l , came h ome with me; Mr. Walley- brought us as far as Bolton. Mr. W. took me to the theatre and a many places more while I was at Manchester, and we have been three times sin c e. I c ame h om e one night with a cou s in of mine, the second night with J. Hall, and the third with Mr. Gardner, and I offended him as ill as I once did Mr. Oldfield-1 left hint anti came home with Archer, corn dealer. I told my father as soon as I got home thall had been at Liverpool; they were surprised, but did not say a word; they were not at all vexed. I assure you I was very thankful, and I hope they will never hear that I saw you, and for my sake do not say anything to Mr. or Mrs. Sutton; yet, however, for if you and them were to quarrel, they might say some thing about me seeing you there. I am very sorry that I ever went to Liverpool at all ; but, as I think at present, they will be a long time before they see me there again; and I am sorry on your account that I ever came, for you spent many an hour both with Sophia and Mrs. S. that now you will not do; but I hope you wilt b e f r i en d s aga i n, for there is nothing so disagree able to me as being at vartance with any one. 'I hope your cold is quite well; do take more care of yourielf; for you have run nearly through your health witii your carelessness. Yon make me very unhappy when I think you are so much altered to what you were when I saw you before, for if anything was to happen you, I do not know what would beconie of me. I think it would break my heart. I am not like you were that Saturday at Mrs. S.'s, telling me to be off, yon could do without me; for I am sure / cookd not do without you. Now, if y-ou 'were to come and spend two Sundays at Preston, would I take off and reave you; and I'll tell you what, whenever meet any of those girls we saw in the square, shut your eyes, and do nit' look at them, for if you once begin With them, I shall 'very soon lose you. My cousin Sarah is quite in love with ,you; she am you 'Were the best man she saw in Liverpool, and it ipit WERE NOT ENGAGED' she would set her cap at you. She heard you men tion a bit of paper when yon left us, and wondered what you could mean. • I expect the next letter you send will be long'er than the last was. I Ain little batter than I was; 'I have had a very had cold since.' came hoine.—Yours ever, BETSY TOWNSEND." "Preston, October 27, 1831. • My dea r Edward,—.7 received yours of the With on M o nday evening', and Most' certainly perceive that you have began it in the same way that I did; •but did you mean it iron. your heart, that's the principle thing. anti I almost fancy that you did not; i t ut you men are so deceitful. You are very much mistaken in regard to what I told you I had heard, in thinking it was a votin g man that told use. I do not think any young niao would have said as much about you to men; but this I know, if he had once he would not have a chance a second time; it was a Married man that told , me. However, I will take your Word, for 1 would much rather, and would Much sooner believe yob than him that told me; but if you have no better an opinion of me when I am writing to you and receiving your letters, than to think I shall keep company with other young men, do not write to me again, for it you tell no more to young women than I either do or have done to men, since I began with you, 1 shall feel very easy.on that point. You were the first I ever went with, and I calculate you will be the last, if it is not your own fitult ; but if there is any one that you love better than me, you certainly are perfectly cit liberty to have them; for. I should not like to have any one that had only a divided cipcticri for me, You tell me to'haye patience; I must asstireilly do not think I am at all impatient; but if it will be .any :satisfaction to you to know that to see you looking with a happy countenance, and comfortably settled, I would wait patiently as Laban did for Rachael, THREE seven years only, and I certainly would rather not, for I think we should both get so very old that you would for get there was such a person as myself in existence. I have wrote this at Miss H.'s, for really the nights get so very cold, that unless 1 was on Mrs. Suttota's •sofa, and you beside me to keep me warm, I durst not sit up to write, though if I had only been behind ysiu'when you were finishing yours, •I would have given you such a squeeze that would have inade you conclude pout letter in a very different manner. I would have put, you are my ow n d ear little girl, and I hive you dearly; but hang it, if you did not mean it; it was a deal better not to put it. Ido not know what you mean by alluding to Mr A., far I am'sure not all the money in the world would make me write indiffe rently to you. I am writing to Sophia this week; I have had twoletters' from her since I came home, and some veal pies; but I 'havirgrot wrote till now. lam very llappy to hear that Mr. S..and . you are friends; I assure you it is as disagreeable to be at variance, or tale telling, as it is to you. I think it just time to conclude. I dare say if I was near ybu when you get this, I should hear you say, what a heap of bother—will thiS tiresome girl never have dune.—Yours sincerely, "B. TOWNSEND. " P.S,—Miss Hall will bring this, and I have seut.you a few oat cakes, if you will have them. 'Yda will, perhaps, have heard that your old friend,. H. Barnes, has got'a Mill at Heaton. and likely to do well. We have had a wedding here of Miss Platt, confectioner, to young Whitehead. They set off for Liverpool as soon 'as the ceremony was over. He has got a situation there:" . ' " Preston, Norember 26, 1831. "My dear Edward,—Yours of the 10th I received with plea sure, arid am happy to hear you are well. lam afraid the oat cakes would not be very good, as you did not get them till'Wed nesday, and I told Miss Hall where you lodged at; hut she had forgot, anal. -had neglected putting a direction on the bait. . I have such kdeal - of news for you. I had a letter last week from Miss Walley, and she believes her brother thought of coming to Preston a reek or two. • Poor fellow,' he has been, and 'gone back this afternoon. - 1 really feel very sorry for him; his father has put him iu an inn, and his sister is with him; but he is going to be married in a fortnight; he brought a ring and license with him. I thiuk I had best have him, don't you?- for he was not like somebody that I know when I was at Man chester, he did not run away on the Sundays I was there. Poor old Schofield has,been taken; but they made a subscription for him, and he soon got liberated.. You, were for betting me some thing when I was at Liverpool that my tattier would shoot this season; but he has never been-yet ;- he has not taken a certi-, fieate out. By the by, I hail very near forgot, you said yeu have never been a shooting; do you newer remember calling at a house somewhere between Liverpool and Preston to borrow a gun? Mind you do not verify the old saying. First, I hope you do not forget to shut your eyes where I told you. I often wish I had not come to Liverpool; I think that I thought a deal less about you before I came than I du now since I came back. ' I often think when I 'am going out, or on a Sunday, now, if Edward was but here, I should have'some compaity, and wonder what you are doing, and how you spend your time, and if ever you go to a place of worship. You say. you. hope I understand your intentions; I think we have been acquainted long enough for both to know each others intention's. God& ness knows you have mine long enough, and time only will tell what yours are. Mr. and Mrs. Sutton have been at Preston; but no doubt you know they have. Mrs. Sutton and I have had a good deal of talk; but there will a day came when' we shall have a deal more. Mr. Sutton told me you were as'good friends as ever; hut I shall not forget their friendship wheal was there. Sophia and Mrs. S..wtil have had a good quarrel before this; she ha,: behaved very ill to Sophia in many-re spects. Mr. Sutton told me be thought you were likely to get a better situation soon. God knows I sincerely hope you will. It is time for me to conclude, whilst I remain, dear Edward, yours ever, "B. TOWNSEND. " P.S.—Excuse all blunders, and what you cannot make out Fivill tell you when I see you. I am afraid it will be a long time before I do; for what with some brandy that I have had, and N. Hall plaguing me, I hardly know what I am doing or writing." " Preston, Dec. 29th, 1831. "My dear Edward, Yours of the 9th 1 received after two or three dissappointment ; you do not always spend your Sunday s iby yoUrSelt, I think, o you would - have sent nay last letter at the Usual time, I- went twice 011 - Monday night, then on Tuesday, well, thought I, he itoily, and if there had not b e en on e th e night after I think 1 s (mid- have been ill myself, so mind you send the next on the Monday, but when you meet with anofler situa tion, write directly and let me know, but direct for me to Miss Walley's. - You say you scarcely understand my last news— perhaps you will thla, and if I had been beside you when you wrote that I had green Mr. T 3 alley some liberties, I would have told you whether I had or net.. I think it was very good to under stand he wants a wife, and.rriost likely thinks he could like me for one as well as ant body else, and as to his bringing the ring with him, every ope'riasf hi's own way you know, and as to which way his heart beats is of no consequence to me, it is your's, as the old song says , that's all the world to me. 1 received a letter and a bit of cake from Mr. Walley the night after I got your last, he was here again on Christmas-day, his sister was married in the morning, they immediately set off to spend a fortnight in Liverpool. Mr. Walley saw them to their lodgings and then took the first coach to Preston, he cause for me 'to spend the fortnight with 'them, he brought his brother-in-law with him (a Mr. Brown).—Yours ever. "B. TOWNSEND." " Preston, January 29, 1835. " Edward,—The reason of my addressing von is, in conse quence of what so lately occurred at home, as I see there would be no chance of happiness either for them or myself, for if I keep on a correspondence with you—if I had you—you would not like to be overlooked by them, so that I think it better for us to part at once. If yoti will please to send my letters by Miss Hodgkinson, she is sending a parcel to Preston either on Tuesday or,Wednesday, so that she will forward them to me: may*God bless you, and may you meet with some one that will make you happier than I could is the sincere prayer of " B. TOWNSEND." " Friday, 3Uth. " Edward,—l received your letter this afternoon; you say you have had many diiappoirrtinents the last fortnight; God knows how sincerelyThope they may be the last you may ever meet with in this world, for there is nothing but trouble in it; if you knew-my heart, Edward, you would pity me; but never mind, live are parted in this world, in a few short years I hope we shall meet iti-a happier and better, where no one can ever separate us. lam very sorry that you have not got another si tuation as yet, but I hope you soon will, and may God in heaven bless you, and may you be happy in it, and may you meet with some one that will-make you happy, as I would have strove to have done had it been my lot to Dave had you, but, God's will be done; send my letters to Sophia, and she will forward them to me, as this is the last yon will ever receive from me; and may health', happiness and prosperity, and every other blessing this world can afford be yours, is the fervent_prayer of " BETSEY TOWNSEND." Having finished reading the letters, the learned counsel said that he had no doubt, after the jury hearing the evidence, that a verdict fur the plaintiff, with considerable damages, would be given. Mr. \TEMA BLES then called Mr. Ambrose utton.--I am clerk in a merchant's counting-house with Mr. Sutton. In 181..3 the plaintiff came to Liverpool. The defendant, Elizabeth Waller, came down to see him about that time. - I recollect the plaintiff looking out for a house for the purpose of getting married. , The parties appeared on excellent terms with each ether, and I have heard her say she would have nobody but him. I have heard the plaintiff and defendant speak together on the subject of marriage. Ile had not money enough for the purpose of taking the house, and . I offered to-adv ance th e m some. Ido not recol lect Mrs. Walley going to look at the house. Margaret Booth examined.---I ani the wife of Mr. Booth, of Preston, innkeeper. lam acquainted with the plaintiff and de fendant. 1 have heard the defendant, Mrs. Walley, speak on :he subject of the marriage. - I have heard her say that she would never have any one but him. I have heard him say that he would have nobody but her. The defendant was staying near. Preston, and her father, hearing she was going to be mar ried, took her awiiv. Within six months of the defendant's marriage with Watley I have heard her speak of Marrying the plaintiff. • The defendant is rather more than twenty-three years old. Her father is a publican residing in Preston. BV'the Junes.—Defendant's father sent - defendant and her mother to Manchester; whilst plaintiff was in Presten, in , order to prevent a marriage between her and plaintiff. . Edward Cray:ton, clerk of the parish church of Preston, proved the marriage of the male defendant with defendant at Preston church t on the 27th of Febraary. This wria the plaintiff's case, and no defence was offered. In -summing .up the evidence, Lord ABlNGfilt said that he knew no distinction which the law made betweera. men and wctrinilai betilirig-tßeit'Vittsrit . for injiirierintlicted by incon ,steitev in love, hat, without a doubt, there was a very great di e . tinction to be observed by a jury in assessing damages in the one case and the other. It•was true that the law gave a power of action to a man as well as to a %vermin, tint the amount of damage was a very different thing, A woman whose affections had been gained by a man who at some subsequent time bioke from her, received a much greater inkier than when a similar case happened to a man. Marriage and the pas s ion ofl o . ve, as t h e poet expreseedlt formed the object of a woman'slife, but in the case of a nein it Was merely an incidental matter. The jolly in i a bi, judge from their experience in life that a man suffered a deal less than a woman on a disappointment of the kind; he had opportunities of going into the world and forgetting- his loss,. his character was less affected by it, he was only laughed at for the day as having been jilted by a woman, and the affair was -forgotten; but when - a woman .was abandoned by her lover it was frequently supposed that there was some cause for the sepa ration affecting her character. For his (the judge's) part he never would advise a friend of his to bring an action against a woman, but, perhaps, he might he prompted to such preference by,his regard to the fair sex, to whom he would give every oppor tunity of changing their minds. He •could not at all admit that Mr. Walley ought to pay a large amount of damages because h e had married this woman ; be had violated no pledge, nor did it even appear that be was aware of the' existence of one. It would appear that women were ,something like racehorses, the more they ran away the more they required following, and had the plaintiff ran after the female defendant as close as the m a t e d e - fendant did, be might. have won the race.. • (Laughter,) Th e learned Judge concluded by statinc , it as his opinion that the smallest amount of damages would meet the jirstice of the ease. The jury retired, and •after a few moment's deliberation re turned a verdict for the defendant. Damages one shilling. COURT.-YESTERDAY. w The court C a i s t6 oe \ c ‘ t r tpiell the whole of this day in trying tw o Cases of aggravated assault upon two females. The prisoners in both eases were found GUILTY. The Lard Chief Justice 'Tyndall, in passing the sentence of death upon the culprits, Abraham Ogden, 21. and James Walton, 21, the men con. nected with the first, and John Tarbuck, with the second case, •gave them no hope of mercy, and entreated them all to prepare 'to meet that, doom which would be speedily executed upon them. . NISI' PRIUS COURT.—YESTERDAY. • • • , (Before Chief Baron ABINGES.) CUNINGHAM V. AINS‘%ORTHA.ND OTHEISS. This was au action against Ainsworth, the younger, one of 'the borough police officers, Flockhart, another of the police ferce, And Mr. Jeffreys, a wine merchant, for false imprison ment. Mi.' CROMPTON opened the pleadings, and Mr. WEIG IiTMA N -stattd the case. • - The learned counsel said that the plaintiff in the present case was a respectable bricklayer in this town, and having been -annoyed by a nuisance arising from a smoky are-place, al joining his' premises, he was indured to take down a wall fer `the purpose of ascertaining from whence the smoke arose: This wall adjoined the house of a Mr. Jeffreys, one of the defendants, 'and.when the plaintiff had made some progress in taking down the wall, Mr. Jeffreys came to hum and told hint to desist. The plaintiff refused to do this, on the grouuds that the wall was. hid otvn, when Mr. Jeffrevs said that he should send for a constable. Some altercation ensued betn'een them, and Jeffreys went away. Shortly afterwards, Ainsworth, the, constable, came, and being then apparently satisfied that the wall belonged to Mr. Cunning. ham, left the premises. 'Sitbiegirently, while the defendant was in his own house, the third defendant, Flockhart, made his ap pearances again with AinsWorth, and they handcuffed the plain ' tiff, and took him before a magistrate, when a charge was brought against him and dismissed. . The plaintiff was working with a hammer at the time the defendant Jeffreys threatened to send for a constable; and the defendant did then say that if any per son came•upon his premises he would knock them. down. Here was a respectable man working on his owl' premises, suddenly dragged Bert re a magistrate harulcuffed, and he would leave it to the feelings of the jury to say if he proved the trespass, what compensation he ought to receive for such an mitt age. It would probably be endeavoured to show that the plaintiff assaulted the defendant with a hammer; but were that preyed, the officers would not have been warranted in apprehending the plaintiff, unless it could be shown he was committing an itlegaract. Joseph Cunningham examined by Mr. GROMPTON.--1 am son of the plaintiff, who is a bricklayer, in Torbock-street. On the' east side of my father's dwelling-house there is a wall of seven or eight feet high. A part of the wall abuts on the gable ' end of a house occupied by a Mr. Jeffreys. In the month of July, last year, my father had occasion to take down the wall, for theiturpose of fintliug out a nuisance. I helped my father' to take it down. When we had taken a portion down, we ob servet a hole which formed the back df a fire place. On taking down this wall we did not remove anvbricks:belonging to Mr. 'Jeffreys' premises. It appeared as a Mr. Jeffreys had taken the bricks nut of their wall and had built the fire-Place against 'our wall. This was to make more. room for the grate, The de fendant Jeffreys came up and asked what we were doing ; we told hire, and he said-we must not do it, asrd my' father told him to mind his own business. Jeffreys then said he ,Would , knock • my father's d—d head off. My father became rather warm, and presently Ainsworth, the policeofficer, Caine; By the JUDGE.--Jeffreys had previously told my father that he had sent for a police officer. By Mr. Ceostevota.- 1 111v father said if he would hold his tongue he would build the wall up again, and that he had not made the hole. When Ainsworth came up he asked my father what •he was doing, and he toldhim, acid asked Ains worth to crime into tite,yard. My father then askeid Ainsworth to whom, the wall h:lopged, :and he said to my . f a th er . Ains worth asked whethei he was pilling down the wall to take the bri'cks My father then told Ainsworth, that as he had got his opinion about the wall he had better retire, and Ainsworth did So. Shortly afterwards a knock came to my father's door, arid Ainsworth and Flockhart came in. 'Flockhart asking for my father, said—" 'Where is this fellow ?" They then entered a room where my 'father was, and told him to come out. Mv father went out, and Flock hart said, what are you pulling down this wall for ? and my father said it was his own wall. Flock hart said, that be d-d, and put his fist in my father's face. lie then laid hold of my father's hands and handcuffed him. Mv' father desired them, when handcuffing him, to mind what they were about ; he would go with them quietly. Flockhart then said, you ordered Chis Man out, " did you ?"—(pointing te Ainsworth.) My father said he would order hini out. 'they then dragged my rather out lido the street'without his hat, and I ran and fetched it and gave it to him. By Mr. ALEXANnun, for the defence.—They dragged my fa ther along, but on his feet. My father Jaid down the hammer by the side of the wall where he had worked, and then went' to wash his hands. By the JUDGE.—He did not take hold of the hammer when he went out: • By Mr. ALtxa N DER.-Mr. Jeffreys, I believe, is a wine-and spirit merchant.—lle might have been knocking at the wall for abort' half an hour before Mr. Jeffreys cave —I cannot sat whyther Mr..Jeffrays cuuiplained of the housc. , --My father dill net threaten to throw a brick at Mr. Jeffreys' head.— When ?}r. Jetfre}s popped - his heud through the sole I did not see him suddenly withdraw it. Mr. Jeffreys did not threaten to throw a brick at' myfather, but said be would knock his head Off. • By Mr. WEIGHTMAN.—The bricks of Jeffreys' premises touch my father'i Mr. Longworth, a surveyor, examined by Mr. WEIGIITM&N. —I examined the wall this morning. From my examination of the premises I should-think that the wall belonged to-the house of the plaintiff. The wall forms no part of the honse, it is merely a' fence wall. I produced au accurate plan of the wall, and the model produced is correct. William Tomkinson examined be Mr. CROMPTON.—I was employed to build up the hole, and I have no doubt but the wall belonged to Mr. Cunningham the plaintiff. John Jones examined by Mr. WHEIGT X IA N e--I met Mr... Cu nningham in the custody of the police-officers, and kneW him; but they were taking him along-so quitykly that I could not speak to him. I met him about. a quarter of a mile from his own house. The constables were taking him to the coalbole. (A laugh.) Mr Jones, clerk to his brother, plaintiff's attorney.—l served notices on the defendants, which I produce. Mr. William Jones.--I am attoruey; for the plaintiff. I was present wbeu the plaintiff was brought before the magistrates. I was sent for by the 'defendant.,, on his behalf. When I ar rived, defendant was in Bridewell. When I first saw him he was brought up in the dock, and charge was made against him, and dismissed by Mr. Case, the sitting magistrate. By the Jution.—The charge was made.by Jeffreys. By Mr. WEIGHTMAN.—I have seen the defendant Flockhart since the action was brought. I called upon Mr. Flockhart and on Mr. Parlour, the superintendent of police, and said that if the constables would make an apology the plaintiff would be satisfied. Mr. Parlour said that he would not allow his officers to make an apology, as it would be a bad precedent. If they cad done wrong they must suffer for it. Flockhart saw me sub sequently and said that be would lose his heart's blood sooner than apologise, and that we should get nothing out of him. By Mr. ALEXANDER.—FIockhart said ho had been to the mayor to know whether he should apologise or not. The mayor said that if they had done anything wrong the matter had better be inquired into. He declined advising an apology. Mr. Case dismissed the charge' by saving that the matter must be decided by civil action between the parties. This was the plaintiff's case. Mr. ALEXANDER then addressed the jury for the defendants. Ile considered the case one of very great importance, as he looked upon it as one brought either to extract money, or to prove that the police officers had grossly abused that power which the law had confided to them. He should, however, be enabled to show that. the latter was not the case, and he consi dered that, under the circumstances; the mayor and Mr. Par lour had acted exceedingly proper in •advising the defendants to make no apology. Could the jury for a moment suppose that if th ese men had acted illegally, and so grossly exceeded their duty, as the evidence given would attribute to them, that they would not have been glad to escape an action by an apo logy ? If the jury were to believe the evidence given by the plaintiff's son, as to his father's peaceable demeanour on the occasion, they must also believe that the defendants were ill - There they found a peaceable man on his own premises, workin g in taking down a building which he had every right to take down, and in walk two police officers, who handcuffed him, and dragged him before a magistrate. If such was the case, which they would find was not, before he had finished, the con duct of the defendants could argue nothing but insanity. Hi s learned f r i en d h a d ma d e an admission something about tt ham mer, which the plaintiff had used against the defendants. His learned friend, 141 r. Weightman, whose skill and ingenuity was well known, he was sure would never have alluded to the hammer in the least had he not been aware that the facts would come out. It appeared that early in the morning, Mr. Jeffreys was alarmed by a continued knocking at the wall ad joining his house, he came out, and found the plaintiff at work, and desired him to desist; the plaintiff refused, and M. Jeffreys threatened to send fur a police officer. The knocking \vas continued, and he did send for a police officer, and Ainsworth a young man who had been but a short time in the police, arrived when he was ordered off the premises by the plaintiff. Being rather young in his profession he was probably afraid to act upon his own responsibility, and he leaves the place, and brings with him Flockhart, a snore experienced hand. The plaintiff, being still at work, was again desired to desist, when the plaintiff threatened to knock the officers down with the hammer he held in his hand if they did no go. He Made all the resistance he could to the rolice-ofticers, who were acting under the orders of Mr. -Jeffreys,,and it .was: With great difficulty they succeeded in placing the, handcuffs upon him. According to boy's evidende there was no more cause to handcuff the plaintiff than there was do the same for him (the learned counsel.) But would the jury believe that? Could they consistently suppose that a police-officer would voluntarily expose himself to an action when there was no reason for if. The charge preferred against the plaintiff,, upon which the de fendants apprehended him, was under thenialicions trespass act, which set forth "that if any person should wilfully damage any public or private property, every such person sh o uld be -taken before a mag i strate, and fined, in any reasonable suns not ex ceeding to." This was a much more satisfactory mode of pro ceeding than bringing an action; but as the magistrate found that there was a dispute as to the ownership of the wall the case was taken out. of his hands, as the only remedy was an action. According to section 23 in this act, any person found damaging property might b e i mm edi a t e l y a ppre h en d e d b y a police-officer, without a warrant, and dealt. with by a magistrate according to law. Thessi two sections justified the *Seers its taking-the "plaintiff ride ciislisdy, even taking it for granted that Jeffreys had done wrong. he would now state to them a fact connected with the rase which the plaintiff's attorney had kept even from his counsel. Would the jury believe that he (Mr. A.) held in his hand a receipt for £2O, signed by the plaintiff's attorney, from Jeffrey's, in discharge of the debt and costs of this very action,. " Jeffreys v. Cunningham and others," and the money had been received 7 days since, during the progres s of the a c ti o n. N ow the jury would see why the plaintiff went to the police-officers for an apology, and he would leave it to the learned judge whether that bit of paper, being a receipt for £2O, drawn from Jeffereys, probably through his weakness, did not put an end to the case against the two police-officers. Mr. WF.IGHTII AN, the plaintiff's counsel, said that after what he had heard he could only expect nominal damages. The learned JUDGE thought that under the circumstances a juror bad better be withdrawn, a bieh was done, and the plain tiff was consequently deprived of the nominal damages and the coats of •the action. DOE IN DEMISE OF HIEGINSON v. FIDLER. , • This was an action of ejectment brought to recover possession of some stabling in the town of St. Helens. The facts of the ease were; that Fidler, the landlord of the Fleece Inn, in St. Helen's, holds some stabling- attached to this building. The Inn 4 10 stabling was taken from a per Son named Higginson., de ceased, who held the prmnises as tenant under Mr. Greenhall, the owner. On taking possession of the in fitim Higginson, and paying to Greenh all £3llO for the stock; an agreement was' said to be entered into between Higginson and the defendant, that the latter should quit the stables at Iligginson's notice, as sub-tenant under Greenhall.- • • The agreement was net signed, and therefore was not read, but witnesses were called to prove that suds agreement was made. The defence set up was, that the only person competent to glee the defendant notice was the owner of the premises, who was It party to letting them to the defendant. The ATTORNEY-GENERA L and Mr. WEIGHTMAN were heard for the defendant, and contended that Greenhall alone had the. power of ejecting. Mr. ALEXANDER appeared for the plaintiff, and the jury, af ter some consideration, returned a verdict for the defendant. D AN'S LlEurENartr.—The health of the Lord Lieutenant was proposed as the second toast yesterday 'at the ordinary of the British Association, by the chairman, Sir Thomasßrisbline, awl was received by the company and treated with the most solemn silence. There was not a hand or glass within our view raised to honor it. Tne - circumstance was rendered very re markable by the manner in whic'a the next toasty--•`'the health Of Doctor Lloyd, president of Ow association"—was received a"d drunk. 'I he company to a man ruse am:l . :cheered our ex cellent provost for- several minutes. A member of the press sat during a part of the cheering, and another member of the fourth estate ce ll e d fur one cheer mote. - We are thus particular in noticing the circumstances apart frosts the usual report of the pr o c e edings, because we find the morning piti.ers all silent on the subject.—Dublin Packet. importo. EAST INDIES. CAPE OF GOOD HOPE, &c. Mary,. Tucker fm Bombay', with 15 bales cotton, 1 box seed, .1,400 pa redwoo , j, 1119 bags pepper, 95 bales 2 hf bales wool, 95 cs gum, arable, 991 ps deer horns, 24 cs gum animl, 100 es cassia, Dirom, Rich mond and co-75 es castor oil, 10 bis Ibg safflower, 1 cse pd muslins, 6 qr es wine, 1512 bls 30 bis cotton, Order—W Dk • 4 3estrian. Kellock, fin Caloutta, with 417 bgs saltpetre, 200 bgs rice 27 chts indigo, 18 bls hides, .1 Bibby and co-7 bls raw silk, lioer and co-9 chts indigo. D and T Willis-506 bales cotton, 3 Miller, jun, and co-50 bgs saltpetre, Alderson, Perrin and co-34 bgs lodi bark, 20 bgs bhalla, 4 bls chayroot, 4 bls anchroot, &fines, Practer and co-,3830 Jigs rice, 57 chts t bx indigo, 36 big cow hides, 12 his hides, 500 bags saltpetre, 30 chits lac dye, 260 lags flour, 15 bls raw silk, 3 pkgs sun dries, Order—B Dk finßombay, with 1363 bales cotton, 692 bags pepper, Sir J Tobia—W Dk WIAS T INDIES AND MADEIRA. James Bailie, Taylor, frp Kingston, Jamaica, with 45 pos.rurn, C Lliwrenee'and co-81 tcs 4 brls Ihf brl voffee, 10 lids sugar , 10 t log wood, 4 tin es arrowroot, 4 bxs retd goods. Order-81 tcs - 89 brls cofte 48 hds sugar, 91 pus rum, 20 t logwood, 112 logs 7 mahogany, 14 Igs ce dar, 13 t c fustic, Iqr ch Mad wine, 1 cse pickles and preserves, J M natolland and co-30 hds sugar, A Stewart and c 6-4 Inds 8 tea 3 cks co fTee, J Ilall and co-12. tes do, It Gray-54 tea do, Gibbs, Son and co-95 brls sarsaparilla. Ferguson, Miller and co-5 tci 8 bids coffee, 5 tou logwood, Holt and Tory-162 dried hides, T and H Murray—l kg tiniannds, W P - Bilshby-1 do, It Gray— Dk SOUTH AMERICA. Glanmaliere, Brown,. fin Valparaiso, with 32 hardwood planks, 74 t ilyewood, 3 bxs specimens natural history, B'hgs wool. Order-174 t 10 c copper ore, Leech and Harrison--400 brls wine, El Sillim-10 eks do, A Claud-2 paintings, Rl3 Smith-2 bxs specimens natural history M.Glover—B Dk . . , ,UYI.ToSD STATES. 'Due D'Orle•ans, !foodless, fin Mobile and New Yorlc., with 806 bls cotbm, J Hobson and Sons—W'Dk /6heibrooke, Longford, fin New Orleans, with 614 bales cotton, .1 Johnson:-.365 do, Roskell, Ogden and co-3 do, J Holmes-16 do, J Dennistoun and co-96 do, A Gordon-605 do, 4 lids whiting, Order -4. W Dk • • Hobart, Cook, fm New Orleans, with 1179 bales cotton, Cropper, Benson and co— Dk Dalhousie Castle. Toole, fm New Orleans, with 19 bales cotton, T W Smith and co-630 do, J.Hobson and Sons-164 do, Melly, Prevost and co-75 do, • Cannon, Miller and co-40 do, .1 Vance, jun-44 do, Martineau, Smith and co-11 do, A Taylor and eo-446 do, J Ridgway and co-114do, J Vance-2,400 cane reeds, 1 pocket samples cotton, 014er—P Dk Nantasket, Davis, fm Sayannah, with 101 bags cotton, Isaac, Low aid co-51 do, Baring, Bros and 00-41 do, Sands, Hodgson and co-- 54 bales do, T Crowder-15 do, Waddington, Holt and co-7-264 do., A Taylor and co-131 do, J.llobson and Son-605 do, Wainwright and Sheils-153 do, Order—P Dk BRITISH AMEIsICA. Wellington, Forster, fm Quebec. With A 59 ps fir, 21 c 6 deals, 12f fms_lathwond, rict; r 20 pn.staves. Order—River Itassenthwaite, Mitchinson, fin Quebec, with 221 ps white pine, 7 ps oak, 51 ps elm and 9 ps ash timber, 211 c 16 standard staves, 51 c 5 deals, W A and U Maxwell-2 dos handspikes, 6 oars, said Master - 11 . Dk China, Di.ll, fin Quebec, with 51 ps oak timber, Order-63 ps elm, 37 ps ash; 10 ps birch and 509 ps white pine timber, 871 c 22 %S I stvs, 395. c 20 standard staves, 41 c 21 E Chakmer—River Britannia, Fraser, fm Liverpool, N S, with 693 ps white pine and 152 ps red pine timber, 101 c staves, 13 cords lathwood, 11 c 22 deals, 1 c 3 spars, 1 moose horn, W Fairclough—River Delhi, Seaton, fn Quebec, 'with 14 ps oak, 81 ps elm, 6 ps ash, and 2 ps bass wood. 1 pee red and 15, ps white pine 28.1 c 23 standard and 391 c 8 W I staves, J Froste and co-471 c 12 deals, 6 deal ends, Order, B Dk__ Victoria, Jleirell, fm New York, with.B94 hales cotton, A Taylor and co-41 do, T B Blackburne--101 do, Wainwright and, Shells-24 do, W C Molyneux-88 do, Roskell. Ogden and co-52 do, Order-3 iron cainbooses, 8 tails shooks, r W Byrnes-19 bats shooks, 10 lea guers, J Beekett and cb—G Dk Globe, Porter, fin New Orleans, with 1580 bales cotton, Keili and Courant—P Dk Augusta; Smith, fm Mobile, with Cropper, Benson and co---50 Wainwright and Sheils-22 do, Fisher Bros and co-50 sticks ced ar wood. A Taylor and co-1 bx m'dise coats unkn, Order—K Dk Britannia, Waite, fm New York, with 301 dila 70, hf etas :tea. for Exportation--65 bales' cotton, Maury, Latham and co-599 d o, Hos kell, Ogden and ca-.-10; do; Harrison and Latham-60 do, Crary, Flet cher and co-43 do, T B Blackburne-240 hrls iron ore, Cropper, Ben son and co-55 t feld spar, J W Harris-2 cs 2 bls coots unkn, W Ro binson and co-5 bgs .saver, T Wilson and co--17 shooks a n d h oops , II bals ' heads, 4 cailaboosea, Fitzhugh and Grimsham.-1 bx hooks, Wotherspoon-1 cse maize, J Bibby and co -3 bars arrowroot, 7 bxs shells, V Rea—r Uk Grafton. Crowell, fin New Orleans, with 1234 bales cotton, Keil! and Courant-14 do, Melly, Prevost and co—P Dk Monongahela, Brown, fm Philadelphia, with 557 hrla turpentine, W and J Brown and co--28 hds bark, 8 cks cents unkn, Fisher Bros -3 cks roots nokn', J Goodwin24 o brla do, Cropper, Benson and co— -1 do, W and J lirowta and, co•--1 box do, S GOddard-1 do, J Ashton -1 belle do, M Wotherspoon-1 pkie do_, T Hodson-52 hales cotton, YWainwright andSheils.-3 thorn tips, D and T Dk England, Maxwell, fm New York. with 665 brls turpentine, W and J Brown and co-37 bales cotton, J Bibby and co-199 do. Crary Sr co —4ols do, Wainwright and co-123 do, Maury and co-2 bxs contents• D Seldon-1 cse do, Order—P Dk John and Mary, Hudson, fm Quebec, with 45 ps elm 13 pa ash and 322 ps pine timber, 464 c 3 staves, J Logan—B Dk Canton, 'Garbutt, fin Montreal and Quebec, with (fm Montreal) 144 ps pine, R Pilkington-51 ps ash, 36 ps elm, 2 Tis maple, and 2 psbirch timber, G Burdy-491 c 24 standard staves, ne 25 staves, Order—(fm Quebec) 234 c 23 deals, Order—B Dk Volulia, Murray, fm Halifax, with 290 ps flr, 2 ps maple, 1961 c 13 staves, 1c L 9 deals, c rickers, 24 handspikes, 4c 19 spars or masts Ibx saleron, Cannon, Miller and co—B Dk Campo Bello,- Heseltine, fm Bathurst, 'with 490 ps yellow pine, 3 ps mae, 136 deals, 104 cords lathwood, Brereton, Jones and co-10 pa yellow pine timber, 3 spars, said Master—B flit Thalia, Graham. fin Quebec, with 372 pa white and 38 ps red pine, 104 0 dealt, 384 c 23 pipe staves, 654 cl 2 pn staves, cl 2 handspikes, 1.4 e oars, A Parlane—River Indian Lass, Stabb, fm Newfoundland, with 176 cks train oil, 6229 seal skins; 2 t old junk. IV W Bulley-115 cks train oil, 3200 seal skins Graham and Taylor—K Dk Providence, Martin, fm Newfoundland, with 326 cks train oil, 5000 seal skins, W W Bulley—K Dk SPAIN AND PQRTLIGAL, Santa Maria, Potter; fm Lisbon, with 1350 qrs 34 bgs wheat, Order —24 bxs grapes, E H Barnett—W Dk MEDITERRANEAN. Ellen, Coster, fin Leghorn, with 1 slab veined and 10 blocks sta tuary marble, 6 cs works of art, G cs marble. 25 tons pozzolano, 64 eks horacic acid, 21 bis wool, 60 his madder roots, 9 cs retd goods, 3 casks lamb skins, 6cs .1 pee alabaster, 33 eka tallow, 69 boxes argol, 2 cks cream tartar, Order-3 pkgs pictures and marble, D Willink-2 pkgs a oprl and books, Ross Bros-1 pkge preparations in wax, W Nfoly- nenx —1 ble waste bilk, J Mawden and Son-1 do. Melly, Provost and co-2 bls wool. J Spence, Son and eo-100 hf chts, 6hf jars oil, E Boultbre-2 t bar iron retd, J Richardson-24 small brls anchovies, said Master— Dk Carena, Hayden, fm Cephalonia, with 87 bta 14 crtls currants, 6 t fustic, J Heap and Sons—G Dk EUROPE. Argo, Hammer, fin Danzic, with /92 pa timber, 40 deals, 10 fms lathwood, ENV Gaebel-2280 plates spelter, 3000 mats, l_prel samples conts unkn, Stewart, Bald and co-200 kgs black beer, YR Grohte - Dk Theodore, Baikie, fm Riga, with 90 bdls hemp, R and G Benn - S Dk Elise, Lange, fm Stettin, with 7 fms lathwood, W Lowe-490 ps oak timber, Landed at Ramsey—Q Dk Victoria, Bargum , fm Kiel, with 1150 cgs wheat, Sandars and Claxton—G Dk Hunse, Ketelaar, fn Groningen, with 45 tons oak bark, J Van Zeller and co—Q Dk Industrie, Van Duvvenboden, fm Rotterdam, with 29 loads 38 bdis bulrushes, Order—Q bk Anna, Kneen, fin Douglas, with 175 quarters barley, Booth and Walmsle,y—S Dk • John Troughton, Jordan, fm Archangel, with 613 bars iron, Order —:450 brls tar, 600 mats, 20 rickers, 81 c 12 deals, If c 21 deal ends, 4 c 20 battens, Richardson arid Pemberton—Q Dk Gute Hoffnung, Rudman, fm Danzic, with 68 ps fir timber 1 fm lath wood, 60 deals ,5 c staves, 205 ps fir timber 7 fms lathwood, P.l W Gae bel-2 bxs refd !peter, Stewart, Bald, and co-50 t spelter, Order—B D gi.bipping Intelligence. TUESDAY, AUGUST 18.—Noon, Wind S.S.E.—Light breeze. High Water at 6 22. SAlLE:).—Marys, St e venson, Barbados--Trinidad Packet, Oriffiths, St. Anareivs-=Lord Oakley. Coward; Renovation, Copland 9 • Sarah ~...tcley. Uu .. _ .. , voplanu , .... Sinclair; Prince Le,Boo, Raw t and Shannon, tiden. Quebee—Fen wick lßeating,lVf W auran, St. John, N.B.—Frederica, Claasen . • Juno, Kraeft, Elsineur—Lukkina Margaretha, Haveling , Alkmaaa,—Marga retha. Johanna, Wallis, Elsineur—Hermenia, Volgest, Flamhurg-,- Jonge Vow Elisabeth, De 94' Yki Rotterdam. Tlie Roval Mint, Rossall ;" Jamaica, Simpson; Rapid, Davidson ; Susanna, Murray ; and Brilliant, Farrell, hence, at Jamaica. The Royalist, Barr, hence, at Trinidad. The Calypso. Sanford, from London, at do. The Ellen —. from Waterford, at do, and sailed for Quebec. The Patita t ioon, Smith, from Barbados, at do, and sailed for De merara. Soartan. Leitch, from New Orleans, at 'Lune. Tagus ' Wade ; and Fairy Queen , Hyem, hence, at Lisbon. Martha, , hence, at Dublin. Verdant, Brown, from Leghorn, at Dublin. Emerald, Fletcher, from Bourdeaux, at Dublin. The Barbados Planter, Austin, • from Huasco and Rio 1e Janeiro, at Mediterranean, Watson, sailed from Jamaica for this port, 7th July. Off Holyhead, outward-hound—No. 1455, Jean, B fr. Sr. Ltera, July 7. —The Princess Elizabeth, Hogarth, from Africa and Barbados for Liverpool, was condemned Ist instant. •The cargo has been transhipped into the barque •Hymen, Head, which , will sail in about a week 'fol Liverpool. The vessel will be sold 21st hist. WEDNESDAY, Amartrr 19.—N00n,, - Wind S. & ARRlvsto—The Ambassador, Upton, froi New Orleans—Girard, Cunningham, from New York, , • ALSO Aniryign—The Falcon', Peyton, from Belfast—Etna, Emer son ; Firmingham, Bearlev ; & Liffey, Murray, from Dublin—Green Isle,• White, from Drogheda—Geor,re IV, PariOns, from Newry —3lO na's Isle, Quayle, from the Isle of Man—JohnWood, Boyd; and Lion, Goodsman, from Glasgow—Countess of Lonsdale, Richards, from Whitehaven. The Cessnock, Chesney, hence, at (Madeira 26th June, and sailed 22(1 for Africa. Berbice. Grayson, hence, at do, 22d ult. General Keane, Walter, from Honduras, at Jamaica. The Hereford, Freer, hence off (10. Thetis. Gill, hence, at Antigua. Earl, 'hens*, at Aux Cayes: Seagull, (packet) from Falmouth, at Barbados. Catherine, Gramm, hence, at Demerara. The Eliza, Bouch, hence ; at Honduras. The Miriam and Jane, Noble, hence, at do. William Mulvey, Jones, hence, at Port-au-Prince. Emulous, Neverson, hence, at St Vincent. • Travelter,ifaivey, hence, at Trinidad. The Mare, of London, for Quebec, off Anticosti. Union, IVEDowell; hence, at Mirarnicht .Calcutta, Banks, hence off Kamouraska, 20th ult. Brisk. Artis, hence, at Gibraltar. Antigua, Fisher, hence, at Malta. Frisk. Whiteway, hence, at Trieste. The Cluirlotte, Parker, from New Orleans, at Havre, and sailed for this port 13th instant. Commerce, Drowse, hence, at Nantz. Reform, Leader, from Newfoundland, at Figueira. EH& Heard, hence, at Hontieur. The Mary Ann Webb, Viner, sailed from Rio de Janeiro for Cal. cutta, 4th June. Enfield, Bottomley, sailed from Valparaiso for this port 16th April. Georgina, Wylie, from Antigua, at Belfast. The Woodland Castle, —, from Barbados, at Cork, sailed 11th ultimo. • Colonist, Smith, from Barbados off Falmouth. Garormo, Skiddy, from New York off do. • Shaw, Fearon, from Bathurst, N B, at Lancaster. Inca; Harrison; froth Rio de Janeiro, at Cowes, sailed 6th June. The Catherine Carolina, f rom Memel, at Bideford, & sailed for this port. The. Royal George. from Christianstailt to this port, is wrecked on the coast of Jutland—captain and five of the crew saved. The Janet, —, from the Clyde for New South Wales, was spo ken 12th instant, in lat. 50, 1eng..16 20. The John Hardy, Cain, from St Jago de Cuba, at Swansea. TIIIIRSIJAY. AUGUST 20.—Noon, Wind S.W.—Fresh. breeLe. Annivsn--Trinculo, Hingston, from Manilla—Feejee. Bewley, fm Singapore, sailed 7th March—Pembroke Castle, Stonburg, from Que bec, sailed 19th July—Charles Joseph, Frost ' • and Ellen Brooks, Red man, from New Orleans—Mo n t rea l, L e it c h, from Quebec—Herald, Ileghes, from Baltimore. SA LRn—llonle, Duncan, for Quebec—Jessie. Thompson, for Mira tnichi—Zeno, Lawson; for Batavi a —Lisette, Bever, for Elsineur— Mathilda, Adamson ; Albertina, Petterson, for Ifaraburgh—Margare tha, Brahns, for Leer—Sir Howard Douglas, WiCtssock, for Miraini ehi—Borea9, etiernhudd and Hoppett, Branstroen. for Elsineur— Cumberland, Nicoll, for Quebee—thadem, Broadhead, for La Guayra and Puerto Cabello. • • . The Antigtia Packet, M'Knight, hence and Batavia, at Singapore. and was to sail for Manilla 27th April: Medora, Tweedie, from New South Wales, at Singapore. The Ganges, Crawford, hence for Quebec, was spoken 12th instant, in lat. 55, long. 16. Francis Ann, from Calcutta, at St -Helena, and sailed for this port 2d July. Aurora, brenning, hence off St Pauls, for Miramichi, 27th July. Ewen, Luccock, hence, at Pernambuco. Sarmenay, Stewart, hence, at Manilla, 24th March. Artemis, Sparks, hence and Batavia, for Singapore, and sailed from Lintin 26th Avril. Preundsehaft; Zeuleke, hence, at Swinemundi. • .The Emulous, fropn Belfast fur Barbados. • Tlis William LZekerlay spoke the Gipsy, Highat, hence for China on the 7th July. The Blenhemi was to sail from Singapore for London, 27th April. A U elitiT 21, 18354 iflarketo. LIVERPOOL CORN E WHEAT, cly 701 b. s d S, d &nglish, new red, 5 10 0 6 3 Do. old 0 0 .. 0 0 Do: new white Do. old 0 0.. 0 0 Scotch, white 5 4 .. 6 4 Do. red Irish, new red. .• 4 9.. 5 7 Do. old 5 2 .. 6 0 Do: new white Do. old 0 0 .. 0 0 Dantzig, red ... • U 0.. 0 0 Do, white , 0 0.. U 0 Stettin, red 0 0.. 0 0 Do. ,1 , 114 e. , 0 0.. 0 0 Coingsberg, red 0 0 .. .0 0 Do. white Riga& Petersburg 0 0 . .. 0 0 Odessa • 0 0 .. 0 0 Russian, hard 0 0 .. 0 0 Canada,. red 5 0.. 6 0 Do. white Bonded Wheat . 3 0.. 4 3 RYE, imp. qr. English and Foreign, free 0 0.. 0 0 Do. in bond BARLEY, tr imp. qr. English, 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. Grinding.6oth 3 10 .. 4 1 Irish, Malting, do. 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. Grinding, do. 3 9 .. 4 0 Foreign, d. p. do, 0 0 .. 0 0 Di o. n bond._ 0 0.. 0 0' OATS, ar 45th. English, new Do. old • 0 0.. 0 0 Scotch, Bte' new 0 0.. 0 0 Do. old 0 0 .. 0 0 LONDON CORN EXI WM.ly. Oats. AVERAGE s d s YI 8 d Of the week Of 6 weeks, re . gulating duty 41 4 28 91 23 11 Duty on Foreign . . .47 8 15 . 4 12 3 !CAN NV - i - 15i0 I --.-- XCHANGE, AUGUST 20, OATS. cir 451 h. s d s ° 4 Irish,.n. hilndried 2 8 0 2 1 ' Do. old do. Do. prime, 121 b Do. 'do. old 0 0.. 0 0 Foreign, trn 0 0 0 0 Do. it bond . 0 0 .. 0 ° I'EA.MZ, inv. qr. Eng Tish, white Foreign, white BRA XB, 4frtmp. qr 'English, new Do. old 0 0 09, Foreign, free Po. to bond 0 0.. 0 4 ° new IIo: old" 0 0 .. - 51A LT, V imp. cir• 61 0 English IN biAN 'CoRN, im. qr. _ ~ Red ...... ;..... 0 0 .0 0 .... 0 0_ o u White FLOUR, 2801 b. English, tine 0 0.. 0 0 Irish, gds, new 99 6 83 6 Dn. fine . American. sweet, • per Uri. free...-. 0 0 0 0 Do. in bond .... 23 0 .. 26 9, Do. sour, free.... 0 0.. 0 1 •; Do. in bond .... 18 0 .. 10 u Canadian, free .. 23 0 .. 94 • _ Do. in bona 0 0 .. 0 . 0 OATMEAL, 4" . 2401 - b English, new .... 0 0 0 0 Irish, new Do. old 22 0 .. 24 ! 13aANAP 24th *o 1 0 Rye. Bns. s . d s d 31 0 40 2 31 5 40 3 23 9 14 0 THE LAST WPRX. Oats Roans I Peas I !Nil() - - Pea s 39 7 39 I 16 9 InFORTATION OF Ci Wheat I Barley I Malt English 7410 1 520 Scotch Irish Brit. Colonies - Foreign 1= LIVERPOOL PROVISION MARKET, ACGUST 20. Dry Butter goes off very freely at rather improvinz rates. Pickled is in moderate request. —The demand for Beef and Pork is good. and the stock of each is unusually light. —ln Bacon, Lard, or Hams there is but little doing. BUTTER.—BeJrast - ,new Banbridge. new OO • 0 —72 0 • Colcrain. Sligo, old . • OO 0 00 - 0 -- Derry, old OO.O 00 0 Waterford, new.. - Cork, new OO 0 70 0 Do. pickled 2ds, new OO 0 69 0 l •—• Do. dry 30s, new - 63 0 . 4 - 7 • Newry • 73 " 0 74 0 --. Do. dry Ist, new OO 0 00 0 7 . Dniida..lk OO 0 00 0 Carlow, new... 74 0 75 0 ,-- BEI? r.—New Prime Mess 95 0 102 6 per tierce. New India 105 0 110 0 ---;- PORK Do. pAco? 4, new Do. &A Dine Halts • 42 0 46 - 0 .... WET Der 3O 0 34 0 -- LARD.—Firkin 44 0 48 0 • Bladdered .48 0 50 .0 ; PRLCES. OF SHARES, LI V ERPOOL, AUGUST 20, 1835 Per skate. Liverpool Coal Gas £3oo 0 0 Liverpool New Gas and Coke Company, £100 New Shares, premium £5O Liverpool andyarrington Water Works Bootle ditto , Exchans, , e Buildings Liverpool and Manchester Railway, £lOO paid 200 0 0 Ditto Old Quarters 25 49 0 0 Ditto New Quarters Bolton and Leigh ditto Ditto 25 20 0 0 Warrington and Newton ditto • lOO 110 0 0 Kenyon•ancl Lelghditto lOO --- 110 0 0 Wigan Branch ditto Preston and Wigan North Union Lined:Un— 20 13 5 0 St. Helens and Runcorn Gap ditto lOO 35 0 0 Leicester and Swannington ditlo PO 49 0 0 Stockton and Harlington ditto Manchester, Bolton, and Bury Railway 2 VI 20 2 6 and Canal Leeds and Selby Railway Grand Junction ditto London and Birmingham ditto SS GO 0 0 Bank of Liverpool lO 17 0 0 Bank of Manchester 25 32 15 0 Manchester and Liverpool District Bank l5 20 5 0 Commercial Bank of Liverpool lO 14 0 0 Liverpool Marine Assurance Company 25 21 0. 0 Oldham Gas Light and Waterworks lO 17 0 0 Manchester Fire and Life Assurance Co lO 10 5 1) Ocean Assurance. Company • Northern and Central Bank of England lO -- 11 0 0 RICHARD DAWSON, Shore Broker. WHOLESALE PRICES OF BALTIC AND Al LIVERPOOL, IBRICAN TIMBER, AUGUST 20, 1835. £. s. d. Z. a. d. TIMBER, Sif cubic foot, Riga Dantzi l g DUTIIS 1.55‘. r load. of 50 ) feet. (10s. ir load of 50 ft. Memel..._. .. 0 9 9 0 2 3 , American Pine Do. Quebec 0 1 88 0 1 9 Red Pine • 0 1 9 0 2 0 Quebec Oak I Birch- CLANKS, 4, foot 012 inch. ! Dantzlg Deck American Pine 0 0 24 0 0 34 DEALS, 41r standard hundred. 1 Best Petersburg Red Do. - White 14 10 0 15 0 0 IMemel Red l6 0 0 17 0 0 Dantric ft Swedish Red 14 10 0 15 10 0 51. 4f load of 50 feet. 1:14 11' I'2o. £2 ss. a .£2 10s. 4,120 £l9 cr , £22 120, THE WORKHOUSE, Statement of the average number and expense of Paupers in the Workhouse, for the week ending PAIJPF.RS. PER MUD. FER %vatic. Aug. 8, 1835...,.. l5Ol ls. lid £l3o 8 10 Aug. 9, 1834. .. ..1750 Is. 100........ 162 1 7 Less 149 Less Os. 2ld. Less 31 12 9 Statement of daily relief paid out-doOr poor, week ending Aug. 17, 1835 9179 families, per week..... X 55 2 Aug. 18, 1834 2171 - More 8 More £lO 15 9 LIVERPOOL DISPENSARIES. Number of new patfents entered on the books of the Dispensaries during the last week:— South. North. Total. Received advice and medicine at the Institution, 241 2SO 521 Visited at their own hohses and supplied with medicine 94 112 236 Total at each Dispensary 335 422 757 vlglroßs. North—Rev. C. Wray, Rev. C. W. Lawrence, and Rey. R. Croft. fionth—Rer. J. 11. 'Thom, Mr. J. Cooper, and Mr. Jordan. LIVERPOOL BANKRUPT BUSINESS. MONDAY, Atx.usr 24. noun WIL{.Wd Lawts, merchant, Ist meeting, at the Bankruptcy Court, Basinghall-street, London, at.. GEORGE LOCKWOOD and WILLIAM WILSON. merchants, final dividend, at.the Clarendon Rooms, at WEDNESDAY, Auntsr 2f. BA9aUEL FRANCRYS, bookseller, Ist meeting, at the Clarendon Rooms, at.... - 1 LIVERPOOL TIDE TABLE. ,Vin. I Ern. F , stfrals, 4e. . H. M. 9 39 10 23 1 11 4. 1 11 41 F. I. ld 2 King William IV born, 176.5. 13 3 -lath Sandal , after Trinity. • St. B,rtholoinew. James Watt died 1819- Ember Week. : 0 9 / 2 MARRIAGES. On Saturday, the 25th tilt.; at St. John the Baptist's Church, To%- teth,parit, Mr. Thomas Wheeler to Miss Chantler. both of that place. On Thursday, the 6th instant, at Lancaster, Mr. Houghton, Preston. cotton-spinner, to Agnes. only daughter of the late John Williamson, Esq., Beckside, Scotfurth, near Lancaster. On Monday. the 10th instant, at Kirkcudbright, by the Rev. George Hamilton, 111 - atthew B. Kerr, Esq., merchant, Penang, to Montgomery Elizabeth, daugh ter of William Mute, Esq., of the former place. On Tuesday, Ilth instant, at Trinity Church, Marylebone, London. Oswald Mosley, Esq., eldest son of Sir Oswald Mosley, Liam M.P., to Maria, eldest daughter of Gen. Bradshaw, K.C. B. On TuCsday list, at St. James's Church, by the Rev. J. Smith, Mr. J. Howarth, of Wigan, to Miss E. Okell, Toxtetb.park. AUGUST. H. . IS. Friday 0 1 9'12 Saturday 22 10 2 SUIsI.I),AY 2.3 3 10 43 ffle • nday • - 94 1 11 23 Tuesday 2s'l 11 59 Wednesday-26 0 17 Thursday —27 056 klArl' I-IS. On the Gth ult., in this town, aged 61 years. Mr. Joh n Mellailew, late of Meadoweroft, rear Rochdale. • On Tbursday, the 23d ult., at Whitton, near Northwich, aged SI. Isaac Broadhurst, Esq. Same day, at Budleigh Salterton, Harriet, wife of James N. Gamer. Esq. of Barbadoes, and daughter of the late Edward WBind, Esq., of Clifton. On Friday, the 24th ult., aged 35, Isabella, wife of Jasper M'Kean. Esq., merchant, Huddersfield. On Tuesday, the 4th inst., aged 70, J. Haigh, Esq., Whitzwell-hall, Yorkshire. .. On Thursday, the 13th instant, at St. James's-place, Jane, wife of Captain 11. Grayson. On Friday; Abe 14th instant, aged 75, Elizabeth, relict of the late Captain Edwards. On Monday. after a very short but painful illness. in the 21st year of his age, Robert, eldest son of Mr. John Richardson. cooper, tnion street, In him his relatives have sustained the loss of a virtuous and affectionate bon and brother. and the recollection of his amiable dis position will he fondly cherished by his surviving friends. On Tuesday last, at Crosby, in the prime of life, and the enjoyment of,the esteem of all who knew him, litrbert Boyer, , Esq., of Trafford Moss, near Manchester. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED EVERY TUESDAY AND FRIDAY MORNING, BY RICHARD PATTISSON, At No. 4, NORTH CRESCENT, CASTLE-STILE: 7T Orders and Advertisements are received by t Messrs. Nee ton and Co., Warwick-square; Barker, Fleet-street; Deacon. Watbrook , Reynell, Chancery-lane; Lawson & Barker, Birchin-lane; Joseph Thomas, 1, Finch-lane, Curnhill.; Mundell Hammond, 27, Lom bard-street; at Garraway's; at"tht; London Commercial Coffee house, Mincing-lane ; Jerusalem entiee,bOuse. Cornhill; Chapter Coffee-house, Pater-noster-TQW, and North and South American Coffee-house, Threadneedle-street, ilFintid6n; by Messrs. Johnston aud 'Co., Dublin; Mr. IT,Phun, Wheeltr, Buhange. street, and Mr. Lewis; Market-street, Manclicister;4l. fiialle~ Bookseller, Warrington ; Mr. Clarke, Pilot-office, Prest,4n ; asit Mr. Cuope, 33, Union-street, Birmingham. / 1 V .~ '' :. Pnr kite itlte .1W fr oN b„, T~ ~rUh