The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1835-03-20 00:00:00

',I, alb.. 1,:o. THEATRE-ROYAL, LIVERPOOL. ITALIAN OPERA. Under the Patronage of the MAYOR and BAILIFFS. The Proprietor regrets exceedingly that, owing to unforeseen circumstances, the last night's Performances did not cont inence at the usual hour;- but he begs to assure the Public that this will not take place again, and trusts th.y will con tinue that kind patronage which be has hitherto received. ONS. DEVIN, Manager, begs leave to inform the - 1 -.1 Nobility, Gentry, and Public of Liverpool and its Vici nity that his BENEFIT will take place this preseqt FRIDA Y, the 20th instant, being the last night of the Opera Company's terfertoing this season, in Liverpool; on which occasion the Marquis de Muti Papazurri has most kindly consented to Lead the Overture and Second Act, and Sing the favourite Aria— ``'l'a, Vedrai la Sventurate," neut . ; (Bellini.) 4 aa Performances to commence with t e chef d'oeuvre of Maestro Vaccai, GIULIETTA E R MEO. (CompresSed into on Act.) Giulietta... 4 Mad le Kyntherland. Cupellio Sign Deval. Adele gnora Campi. Romeo Signora Cesari. Lorenzo Signor Boisragon. Tebaldii Signor Galli. After which, A VOCAL AND INSTRUMENTAL CONCERT, tonsisting of the following celebrated Pieces :—Duo Buffo, character,) Signor Deval e Marani, "Per comperre uu rainma serio , " from the favourite Opera, 4 .‘ La Prove. d'uu Opera aerie del Maestro Guecco."-1: antasia Flute, Mr. E. Brown, (by desire,) introducing Bolera, Kitty Tyrrel, and a -favourite Waltz, (Nicholsou.)—Grand Scena e Aria, (in cos tume,) Signora Cesari.—Cavatina— ,. Tu Vedrai la Sventu rate," 11 PliAta. (Bellini,) the Marquis de Muti Papazurri.— Quartetto Trumbini (by,particular desire.) To be succeeded by the favourite Opera Buffo, 1L CORRADINO. (Compressed into one Act.) Matilde Shabran Madame Kyntherland. Corradiuo Signor Deval. Isodoro..Signor Marani. I Alipraudo..Signor Boisragon. Eduardo.. Signora Campi. Ginardo..Signor Galli. Contessa d'Areo....Signora N. N. Egoldo..Signor Agostino. Itoderigo..Signor Troynno. Subscribers' Tickets are not admitted on this Evening. Prices o f Ad m i ss i on : —L ower B oxes , 4 5 . ; Upper Boxes and t'it, 2s. 6d.; Gallery, Is. ,s(* hi consequence of -the length of the Performance, the IJOur s will be opened at Six o'clock, and the Performances to commence at Seven precisely'. Tickets to be had at the Theatre, where Places for the Boxes may be taken of Sig nor Campi, and at M. DEviN's Residence, Clayton-square. Ebt Eiberpool ,Stanbarb. FRIDAY MORNING. MARCH 20, 1835. The conduct of Lord LONDONDERRY, in relinquishing the high and honourable office which he received from his Majesty, reflects unspeakable credit on the noble mar 'Pits it shows that he perfectly understands what is due t ° his own pride and dignity, and how insignificant in Ilia estimation are the rewards and honours of office when t hey clash in the slightest degree with his own independ- - ;., ne er or even the factious censure of the House of ‘-'uartsion s . lOW very different is the conduct of some Whig states -41". Lord BROUGHAM could hardly be induced to re "re after he had been dismissed. He could not bear Parting with the great seal without perpetrating some Paltry job by way of finish to his dying speech. And Lord DURHAM too ! Quite as much was said about his to the Court of Russia as has been said about the in tended o ne o f L or d L O NDONDERRY. But did the no ble, amiable, courteous, and diplomatic Earl of DURHAM "Pack his boxes, return his outfit, and throw up his ap rintment ? Not a bit of it. The public money, wrung r ein the taxes, had irresistible cliatins in the eyes of the 'big baron. The preposterous fully of such an appoint, 41e nt did not invoke the condemnation of such men as S 41114 ., CUTLAR FERGUSSON, Huatx, Lord JOHN RUSSELL, °t the Lord STANLEY. The latter nobleman knew from the b eginnin g that Lord DURHAM'S mission was as rank a th as ever wa s co ncocted by any set of ministers. It 48 an embassy without an object or a purpose foreign t° the accom m od a tion of c ertain personal squabbles in tll e eabinet. Lord STANLEY knew that it was simply a fam ily arrangement—a tour of pleasure in consequence of o sinisterial embarrassments—and that it never had or bir r its intended to have any effect whatever upon the policy 4 411 ssia in connexion with the interests of Great Bri tk Lord DURHAM, however, went his way without a itl 41 11111 , --L O rd STANLEY looked on without a blush ; and L t We find th e latter nobleman a cons e nti ng p ar ty t o th e i mion of Lord DURHAM, and a strenuous opponent to th at of the Marquis of LONDONDERRY. 0, tempora ! O s store s We believe that the conduct of the House of Corn clis on this o cc a s ion is altogether unprecedented. Du riling th e administration of which Lord STANLEY was a :,her an attempt was made by O'CONNELL to remove " degrade Sir WILLIAM SMITH from the Irish bench, i tb ilY because he was an honest and upright judge: Had ti lt WILLIAM SMITH been a corrupt judge—had he been I , 3 l4 ,judge what O'CONNELL is as a legislator—there Z i lt have been good grounds for removing him by an C i t es, to the crown. On that occasion Lord STANLEY, lia honour, refused to entertain or enter upon the al -1,(,1i0.113 of Sir WILLIAM SMITH'S unprincipled accuser. . 0 1 . 118 We say to the noble lord's credit; but what is his M arqui s in the case of Lord LONDONDERRY ? The noble 111 4r quis is n o t accuse d o f. any p o liti c al or official tnisde e4,4°llr- He had committed no overt act of treason 1 e ve" his sover e ign lord the King or the LORDS of the tih ve t house.. He had not entered upon his office—he ad net been tried—be had not even been gazetted. Who a °W4 Whether Lord LONDONDERRY'S conduct would or : 41 d not have been that of which the House of Com hn,s itself m i g h t h ave a pp ro ved? He had before been o e 4 11° ured with the thanks of that house for important Tees; rendered to his country ; and was it impossible , n xti r ' 4l. from being probable, that he should receive similar nk s.for similar services at the Court of St. Peters -I,:gh No man of any sense or any honesty would as . 1 , - ' t any thing half so absurd. Lord STANLEY professes l dive_ the ministers a fair trial. Would we could say tr t Per fect d sincerity that we believe Lord STANLEY. His 1-I °4 ' ll et is already at open variance . with his professions. i d eclarations at Glasgow, on the hustings at Lancas tssir' 4 " from the cross benches of the House of Com a:4.ll.)s are constructively violated in his attack upon an in s r l w u nal sele c t e d by the crown to perform certain duties tli h ich ministers were to be responsible and by which t r i -Y , were to be judged. Is there any thing like a " fair n ot ' " in thi s con d uc t? If it be "fair," certainly it is 4 r "trial," unlessin the sense of the Edinburg h din whieh was eaten or ended before it had begun. But let us look upon the proceeding in a still Imre im jtidt4nt light. If the House of Commons is to sit in as r e nt upon the conduct of high functionaries as soo n ap o le y are nominated, and before they have entered oter n the di scharge of their dut i es, thereby i nva di n g the a t , ° Ratives of th e cro wn and condemning men unheard, It to d y w i lin must be guiltless of any offence, inasmuch as Dave not had either the power or the opportunity to O le b u t : where is all this interference to end, and. how is s,b as _ s _in s ess . of the overnment to be carried on ? If an te, l ,, "'nor is to be g removed, or induced to retire, by in aeePet at attacks in the House of Commons, why not a st tet lrY of state, why not a collector of customs, why gremeclnrnissioner of the pr laws ? To descend from thi ngs to small—from oo men to mice—from Lcrd LONDONDERRY to Mr. Commissioner EARLE—we beg leave to put a case which Lord STANLEY will understand. The Duke of WELLINGTON recommended Lord LoN DONDERRY to the King as a fit person to represent his Majesty at the court of the Czar; Lord STANLEY re commendeJ Mr. EARLE to Mr. Secretary GotTLBuRN as a fit person to discharge the duties of a poor-law commis sioner. We do not inquire into motives, for we presume them to have been honourable ; but what would Lord STANLEY have said if the House of Commons had chal lenged the fitness of his nominee on the ground of some misunderstood or unintelligible speechdelivered at a for mer period of his life, or on the ground that his brother is a "leveller and a radical reformer ?'? We beg pardon for descending so far for the sake of contrast, but we contend that the two cases are strictly analagous. The House of Commons has no right, except by positive usur pation, to deprecate or condemn the appointment in either the one case or the other. Theministry would be respon sible for both ; and, if either were responsible, the censure should fall upon the minister and not upon his nominee. If, roe instance, the appointment of Lord LONDONDERRY had been of a nature calculated to bring the crown or the interests of the state into danger, an assumption which no man has a right to make, for it is incapable of demonstration,—but admitting it to be so, tired it might become the duty of the House of commons to address the crown for the removal of such ministers. Lord LoN DONDERRY is nothing more than a private individual, re sponsible only to those by whom, he was appointed. He is relatively nothing more than the very obscure person recommended by Lord STANLEY. Neither knows any• thing of the House of Commons, for they are not amen able to it in any way whatever. To single such parties out, however, in the House of Commons, while their patrons and employers are left unassailed, is in the last degree mean, cowardly, and disgraceful. To admit that every °facer appointed by ministers is to be liable to the attacks of such men as SHELL, ROEBUCK, Hua n r, and O'CoNstELL—is at once to admit that private calumny and factious violence should know no bounds, and that no man is fit to serve his country who has not received a carte blanche or purchased a passport, or obtained a cer tificate from this or the other coxcomb or blockhead who spouts in a tavern or is the delegate of a political union. If this miserable malice is to be persevered in, and coun tenanced by the House of Commons, the people of Eng land will soon see where is the nuisance which festers in the commonwealth, and interrupts the progress of good government. If idle and virulent tirades in parliament are suffered to deter the able and honourable men of the country froth entering its service, we shall soon be reduced to an executive government of hypocrites and poltroons—of beggars and knaves. If unprincipled pup_ pets, deported hither as representatives by the popish priests of Irelancl, are permitted to engage the attention of the House of Commons from its responsible duties, by vulgar and personal invectives against our public men, we may depend upon it that the "death's head and cross bones," consecrated at Maynooth, will be placed over our doors before long. Let us have the spirit to guard against this before it be too late. Our contemporary of London, the Times, within the last few days, in a spirited, able, and indignant article—in an article so truly English that it cannot be sufficiently admired—contended that the priests of Ireland had become so insolent, overbearing, and ferocious in their conduct, that they could be no longer tolerated or endured, and that the safety of this more important portion of the empire called loudly for some legislative measures of a coercive nature against them. In these sentiments we heartily concur. The time is come when such wholesome restraints are indis pensable. One word more on this subject and we have done for the present. We have had occasion to speak, perhaps sorely, and as some may think act itnoniously, of the con duct of Lord STANLEY. We sincerely hope that it is the last time. We always feel pain in giving utterance to any feelings, warm though they may be, from the impulse of the moment, which, when clothed in language, are calculated to give umbrage or offence to a man of enlarged genius and splendid talents. The.noble lord is yet but a very young man. Dark' is the day in which we live— few are the spirits walking in our ancestral halls, who • have the rich and glowing halo upon them of the rising sun—there is a,pall spread upon the gloi ies of England —we are now a nation verifying NAPOLEON'S sneer, and fulfilling NAPOLEON'S curse—we are in the wake of our renown, our credit being, like our fame, posthumous —we therefore can ill spare the talents, may we say the virtues? of Lord STANLEY. He must see, far clearer than we do, or we overestimate his discernment, that the last battle has now to be fought between conservatism and unhal lowed 'revolution. It is not now a party struggle between PITT and Fox—but between the monarchy and an un licensed democracy—between property and spoliation— between protestantism and popery—between him who has and him who has not any thing to lose—between the law ful owner and the profligate plunderer. • We believe Lord STANLEY to be religiously honest and unreservedly sincere. It is not his principles we fear, but his weakness. His intellectual qualities have no otlm enemy but that which belongs to a perturbed vanity which feeds upon and destroys itself. The noble lord must see, constituted as parties are, that, at present, he has not the most remote chance of either leading the House of Commons, or of acquiring that preponderance in the senate, which, by gratifying his ambition, would for a single day, sustain him in supreme power. The house of Derby has no modern claims upon the confidence of the peOple of England. Its most distinguished scion has not yet won golden opinions from all sorts of men. It will be a long time before Lord STANLEY can procure three hundred supporters in the House of Commons. He ought to fling from him the personal and private admo nitions of the Duke of RICHMOND. They are utterly beneath his consideration. Spleen by inoculation is a gangrene in the soul of genius. The counsels of Sir JAMES GRAHAM are only valuable in the inverse ratio of their present sincerity estimated by his political consis tency. Lord STANLEY will be pleased to recollect what Sir JAMES professed when he opposed the WELLINGTON administration on the currency question. His pamphlets would not be an unprofitable study at the present hour. These will explain why Sir JAMES GRAHAM'S principles are worth nothing, and prave that Lord STANLEY'S fidelity_ to principle is every thing. We have no wish to speak harshly of the right Honourable baronet, otherwise his political character in our hands would not be worth three hours' purchase. We are only anxious to save Lord STANLEY without destroying Sir - JAMES GRAHAM. The noble lord we hope will take the hint. He cannot be minister yet—he may never be the Earl of DERBY. In the changes of the last forty years we have seen kings living upon royal alms, and nobles begging their bread. God forbid that, in reality, the revolutionary eagle should carry off the hopeful child. These hastily written sentences—perhaps too senten tious--will, we fear, be only understood by the initiated. They are not, however, written in a bad spirit. They are not dipped in the venom of an anabaptist like the pen of the Globe, or in the unitarian bile of the Morning Chronicle. Tire former is only silly, the latter is rabid. We pause to consider other matters. Sir ROBERT PEEL has formally announced that if the supplies are limited or stopped he will resign. We rejoice to observe that the right honourable baronet has made the declaration. He has given an opportunity to HU3IE and Lord JOHN RUSSELL to turn him out. The poor creature last named, for whom we know Lord STANLEY entertains the greltest contempt, can hardly bring its diminutive mortality to the conviction that it is out of 'office, and that there is no salary_for it at quarter day. There is not a living creature on the face of the earth for which we have a greater contempt than for Lord JOHN RUSSELL. It is a general if not universal sentiment. Sir ROBERT PEEL, however, dares him to the trial. He has challenged Lord JOHN to the lists. He has nobly and magnanimously told biro that if he can procure a vote signifying a want of confidence in his Majesty's ministers, he, Sir ROBERT PEEL, Will resign.' Let us then have a fair trial of strength, for the pre sent skirmishing in the House of Commons is only wast ing precious time and exhausting public confidence. We are satisfied that an immense majority of the people have the utmost confidence in the character and professions of Sir ROBERT PEEL. It is only in the House of Com mons where united faction can pester him. The only way to crush that faction for ever is to give them a tri umph, and for ministers to suffer a defeat upon an im portant question. We are satisfied that it is impossible to form a ministry from any other section of public men than the present conservative party. The whigs are characterless and broken down. The people every where hold them in the greatest contempt. Even in the most populous and radical districts, the name whirls synonymous with --, a word we do not choose to write. The Hums faction never had any pretensions to character, and it never was and never will be endured for a single day in office by the people of England. If they could but get into place for a week there would be a dreadful scramble, and th tail might possibly get fat, hut there is no fear of this. The conservatives, there fore, have nothing to dread from a defeat in the House of Commons; and rather than submit to petty wrang ling, and factious clamour, and vulgar personalties, night after night, they should court the conflict, and if discomfited - make another appeal to the electors. This ordeal would wash away the rubbish of the present house, and give us an increased number of faithful, in telligent, and respectable representatives. We have reported at as full length as our limits will permit the speech of Sir ROBERT- PEEL on introducing the dissenters' marriage bill. One thing seems to have been accomplished by the right honourable baronet—he has brought forward a measure, after a short consideration, which has received the approbation of the house generally, and which Lord JOHN RUSSELL attempted to do and failed. The noble lord's bill had been nursed by him for a con siderable period—it had been fondled by all the political housemaids of his party—it had been watched and doc tored by the whig quacks; but when introduced into the house, and placed before the public, it was found to be a sickly, ugly thing which no one would look at, and which the dissenters disowned. In short, it perished the moment it was exposed to the daylight. Sir ROBERT'S bill, however, has been differently received, and it is likely, with some modifications, to be come the law of the land. We might here raise the question as to the necessity or expediency of altering the present form and ceremonial of marriage, which we think has not been proved; but we pass it by, seeing that a plan is proposed which is satisfactory to the house, and will, perhaps, be consiiered so by the great body of dis senters. If they say content, we can have no earthly objection to it, provided the bill is so framed that it shall not be productive of fraudulent or spurious marriages, and shall not be prejudicial to public morals. Let us for the present consider it in this last point Of view. The bill enacts that the parties wishing to be married shall go before one justice of the peace, and swear that they are dissenters from the church of Eng land, and that there are no legal impediments to their union. One or other of them must also swear that he or she has resided in the parish or hundred where the magis trate resides for the space of seven days previous to the application. This is the first step in the matrimonia process. The happy creatures are here booked but not yet bound. They are allowed fifteen days to repent which is questionless an act of great generosity and liberality on the part of Sir ROBERT PEEL. If no repent. ance take place they may, after fifteen days, and before three months, return to the magistrate, sign a civil and simple contract, and declare themselves " man and wife.' The business is then done for ever. But here a difficulty arises at the very outset, and it is a serious one. Suppose EBENEZER SMITH and REBECCA JONES go before a justice of the peace in Liverpool, Mr. WALLACE CURRIE for instance, and make their affidavit in due form, and that they return to declare themselves "man and wife" after the lapse of fifteen days—how very foolish they would look if master justice were not to be found. The worthy magistrate might be making a speech in Clayton-square—he might be gone a fishing, hunting, or shooting—he might be at a watering place, or inhaling the breezes of the Welsh mountains. It is quite possibl e that, by an arrangement, another justice might be found to perfoi-m the duties of Mr. WALLACE CURRIE, and complete the contract. Still, this would be vexatious, for ,affidavits are apt to be mislaid, and a dispute might arise as to identity. What proof could the second magis trate have that the EBENEZER and REBECCA mentioned in the affidavit are the parties who come to declare them selves "man and wife"? But if a difficulty like this might occur in Liverpool, where we have many justices of the peace, how much greater and embarrassing the difficulty in country places and remote districts, where the magistrate , might live ten or twenty miles away'from the residence of the bride and her lord? The church is always open for this interesting ceremonialthe time when is universally known—the priest never dies—there is rarely any disappointment. Not so the house of the magistrate or the magistrate himself. He has the sessions and the assizes to attend to; and the chance is that in four days out of the seven you cannot depend upon finding hint at home at any given hour—if at all. - In short, we conceive it to be impossible to secure the legal registration of marriages except through the medium of the established church. When a marriage is celebrated, as at present, the parties sign the register at once—it is witnessed—it is completed, and it becomes a legal docu ment, as tangible, and as well secured as any document can be. Not so will be the registration of dissenters' marriages. What if the magistrate—being an old man, or an indolent, or a careless one—should neglect to for ward the papers to the clerk for registration, or in sending them through the pustoffice they shobid be miscarried oil lost? The parties most interested would perpaps never know of this loss. It, in all probability, would not be discovered until after they were dead, and then only in consequence of some question relative to property or succession. The register would be searched but no names found. The marriage might be disputed, and the children of a magisterial marriage declared to be illegiti mate. There are many other points in the bill equally open to objection, and we shall possibly recur to them; but we have this to say, that if the dissenters are satisfied with the bill, wa ARE. We beg to direct attention to a series of tables and estimates, which will be found elsewhere, explana tory of the bases of Mr. MooßE's plan fur supplying Liverpool with water for extinguishing fires. The plan itself has already been submitted to our readers. The facts, however, for which we can vouch, present to view a frightful picture of the ravages of fire in this town within the last three years. We are confident that such destruction of property—from accident as it is called never occurred in any part of England or of Europe in so byiefa period of the last hundred years. If we were to say that such devastation is quite unprecedented we should not be overstepping the truth. In short, our fire-police system has been so wretchedly managed, and the supply of water has been so inadequate, that the premiums of insurance have reached an enormous height, not more high, we confess, than the hazard warrants, but still so • high as to render some change in our system indispen sably necessary. If the evil cannot be corrected we may depend upon it that the warehousing trade will leave the place, property will be deteriorated, and our labouring population deprived of employment. Mr. MOORE shows that from the end of 1831 to the beginning of the present year the ascertained loss of property by fire in Liverpool amounts to near £400,000. This is only the ascertained loss. Much has been de stroyed of which no account can be obtained, and of course no exact estimate formed ; but at a rough guess we should not exaggerate were we to assume that the aggregate loss comes very near to HALF A MILLION We are bound to admit that the property consumed is of an extremely ignitible nature, but that is no reason why cotton should be more exposed to. fire in Liverpool t han in Manchester, London, or Glasgow. Mr. MooRE urth6r calculates that the value of property in Liver pool liable to destruction or serious injury by fire amounts to upwards of TWENTY MILLIONS I ! These facts being premised, the next consideration is a emedy for so astounding an evil. The water companies, so far as they afford a plentiful supply of pure and whole some water to the inhabitants, are in a most efficient state, and with the exception of the cottage owners, there are no complaints against them. They have gone to great expense in conveying this pure water to all parts of the town ; but the question is, can they, even if dis posed, afford such a constant supply of water as is required at a moment's notice when fires take place ? We contend they cannot, and it would be unreasonable to expect them to keep their mains pei petually charged in order to meet contingencies of this kind, however cala mitous. It is proved beyond all cavil and dispute that at none of the fires, which have happened within the period alluded to, have the engines been promptly supplied from the mains of the water companies. Our own pages offer ample evidence on this point; but we prefer the evidence of a contemporary. At the fire in Lancelot's-hey in October last, where the loss amounted to £30,000, the Liverpool Mercury states• that, after the engines had arrived, "some time elapsed before the plugs were found, and when found there was no water in them, - and that " fully an hour and a half, if not two hours, elapsed before an adequate supply could be obtained!" The Mercury'ful tiler observes—" we are sure that with even a moderate supply the fire might have been extinguished before it extended further than the story in which it com menced." The same journal, in noticing the fire at FOSTER and STEWART'S, in Lawton-street, where £B,OOO of property was consumed, says—" The Norwich engine was pre vented from playing with effect on the range of shops in which the fire first broke out by the scanty supply of water," and that, " had there been water when the engine first came on the ground, the fire could have been con fined to the one story shop in which it originated." At the-fire at FOSTER and GRIFFIN'S, in January last, the same complaints are made. It commenced at twenty minpl,es past eight o'clock, the engines were pro'mptly on the ground, "but there was no water in the mains!!" This evidence is sufficient for the present and for our purpose. It is clear that there is no adequate supply of water for extinguishing fires in Liverpool, and it is equally clear that there can be none while the present system remains. Some statements, we understand, have recently been made, holdint , forth the prospect of a better supply in future ! These hopes are utterly fallacious. They have been indulged in too long; and they emanate from quarters too interested, and too fond of official Dogberryistn, to be entitled to any credit. The fact is, that the fire police, from being deprived of an efficient director, is now in a worse state than ever, and yet there are no facilities given or can be given at present, from the docks or mains, for a better or more ready supply of water. We now return to Mr. MOORE'S plan, which is decid , edly the best that has ever been proposed. It is simple, it is cheap, it could be easily carried into execution, and it would provide an abundant and ever -ready supply of water to a large portion of the town, and that portion too where the most valuable and ignitible property is warehoused. In the tables will be found the various places where the water level of the Leeds canal is above and below the streets. This water can be obtained for the trouble and expense of conveying it, and we think the water companies ought, and we think would liberally contribute to carry the plan into effect. The water pro cured in this way and thrown upon fires would save the Water of the several companies. It might barnacle as orna mental as useful. There might be an elegant fountain at the New Custom House, and another near St. George's church. There would be plenty of water in all the low parts of the town, and in every pillar of the dock sheds. The engines would be supplied the very moment they an ived on the spot, and as it is impossible to exhaust the supply, it could be used most beneficially for health in washing the streets and common sewers. We earnestly call the attention of the authorities and the in habitants to the subject. M A nc H 20, 1536. LI V Elt Tli EA TliE. SOMETHING NEW! PIPTY NIGHTS IN SUCCESSION! THAT'.I4 YOUR SORT! THE Nobility, Gentry, and the Publi in general are most respectfully informed that PIERCE EGAN'S B EFIT le fixed for WEDNRSDAY next, t 25th instant, the Suc e4sssur. AUTHOR of LIFE IN VERPOOL, completely ilPPrdented in the Good Old Town, having been performed Inv Nights in succession. Oiler the above circumstances, , the Author most humbly ','°Pes that hi s numerous Patrons will give him their support `1 the present occasion. variety of Performances will take place, which will be !Itpressed iu the Bills of the day, and PIERCE EGAN will have the honour of appearing in a New Character. TO CORRESPONDENTS. - , e must again remind our friends that owing to the length at which we are obliged to report the parliamentary proceed ingg, we cannot make routzt for even a tithe of their column icationg. • V e cannot insert the questions of FAIR PLAY without the pro tection of his name. The "row" in the House of Representatives from a New Orleans paper, and the popish riot at Cincinnati will keep till next Tuesday. 'W e cannot interfere with the Mercury and its chronometers. The thing is understood. -6 conversation near the Prince's Dock, if possible, in our next. ' V e have seen no account of the rev. gentleman alluded to by a "Cbnstant Reader," and do not believe that there is any truth in the rumour. THE LIVERPOOL STANDARD. LONDON LATEST NEWS. City, Half-past Seven o'clock, Wednesday Evening. The progress of the ministry is so satisfactory, and the general feeling is now so strong that the faction by which its overthrow was sought is discomfited, not to be rallied again, that our money market has assumed a very buoyant appearance, and there has been a general advance in every description of security. The closing quotation of Consols for the Accouut this afternoon was 921, and the prices for Money was 92k. Favourable accounts have been received from the Imperial Brazilian Mines, which has caused the shares to advance to £47 per_ share. The following are the closing prices : Bank Stock 3 per Cent. Reduced .... shut Chiiian -lb& i 3 per Cent. Consols ....921 i Columbian . 391 39 35i per Cent. Consols .. shut Danish ISt 31 per Cent. Reduced....shut Dutch 5 per Cents.. 1031 % New 3,4 per Cents .... 100 i Do. 21 per Cents 34 ?i India !lends 2O 22 Mexican Exchequer Bills 39 40 Portuguese 93 1 ii I a Long Annuities shut Russian O9 Consuls for Act 92i % Spanish .... ... 65 651 6i Belgian lO2 l 31 3 Do. Scrip .... 8X % ii % x LIVERPOOL POLICE. WEDNESDAY. — (Before the MAYOR and Mr. Ald. ROBINSON.) LANDLORD AND TENANT.—Misther Pat Delaney, Mrs. Pat Delaney, and a kind neighbour of theirs, rejoicing in the name of Arabella ltigg , were placed at the bar, charged with assault ing one Mistress Jones, the fat proprietress of the LIU tene ment in which the said Mr. and Mrs. Delany reside. Mistres s Jones, with a horrible grin, evidently intended for a fascinating smile, having pushed forward through a host of wit nesses on both sides, and having made a low bob to the magis trates, stated the case.—" Gentlemen, (another bob,) these prisoners is fish women." Misther Delaney.—What me ? Mistress Jones.—Your.vrife is, and that's worse—hold your din. (The constables cried " silence," and Mrs. Jones pro ceeded.) Well, your honours, as I was saying, these people owes me a quarter's rent. Magistrate,-1 did not hear that before. Mrs. Jones.—Oh, but its true, yer honours--stop till I tells you. I goes yesterday for the same, and when I gets in, (my own, house—mind that, your worships,) says 1, "Mrs. Delaney, where's the rent?" " What tint?' says she. " Why, the quarter's rent," says L " Divil the qua r t er d o I owe,'' says she. " Madame," says I, " you do," upon which up gets Mrs. Arabella Rigg, whets in the fish line, and " sorry am 1" says she, " the poker's not hot, or a taste of it I'd give yees." "Is that your game?" says I, so I calls id the bum-bailiffs, what was waiting at the door, and seized the traps. They then begins to set upon me, and this is the black eye, the torn cap and bonnet that I got. - Magistrate.—Well, what did the male prisoner do? Mrs. Jones.—He didn't do so much then yer worship, 'cause he couldn't; but he's a bad un, and not particular to nothing, from pitch and toss to manslaughter. 1 supposes he broke open the house after the baileys lock it up, as all the traPi is gone. Mister Delaney, in his defence, said that the complainant was beating Mrs. Delaney, and he only interfered to stop a row. Mrs. Delaney having been asked if she wished to say any thing, replied, " It's me that dues." Yer humble servants, yer honours, and gentlemen, what this woman says is all lies, as I've got witnesses to show. 1 owes no rent. It's a disorderly house, and a disgrace to any body to live iu. Magistrate.—Then why do you stay? Mrs. Delaney.—Because nobody will let me have a house after leaving this, it's got such a bad character. The gang of witnesses before alluded to h&c commenced all talking at once on behalf of their friends, in the midst of which the magistrates ordered both plaintiff and defendants to find bail to keep the peace for three months. THE ITALIAN OPERA.-SIG. DEVAL'S BENEFIT. On theatrical benefit nights audiences are proverbial for their kindness, and critics for their forbearance, and in the present case, in order not to break the statute "made and provided,'' we shall content ourselves with being historians only. For the b'enefit of Signet•Deyal on Tuesday night " 11 Corradino," the (*era iu whichle made his first appearance on our stage, and qh any stage in England, was performed. The total failure, not °tilt of Deval, but of almost that whole operatic corps in every scene, induced us to make some inquiries as to the causes of theie defects. They were, we are told, attributable to a move ment of the company to Chester, instead of rehearsing at Li verpool; hence the passage to and from, and their exertions at that ancient city, where they 'performed twice, disordered their vocal organs, as well as precluded them from acquiring the necessary degree of pet faction in their several parts. Owing to this absence the whole of Tuesday was occupied in rehears ing, and when the curtain was raised the principal performers were, from bodily exhaustion, in an unfit state to appear before the public. The second act of the opera was reduced to one scene, for which Signor Boisragon bespoke the indulgence of the audience. The house was literally full in every part. On Wednesday night "Il Corradino" was, or, snore properly speaking, was to have been repeated, for, in consequence of some unfortunate circumstances, it was again doomed to suffer Dearly the same degree of mutilation to which it had been sub jected on the previous night. Mr. Herrmann, the leader of the hand, was absept on a pro fessional engagement elsewhere, and the Marquis de Muti Pa pazurri, who was to have supplied his place, was very unex pectedly prevented from doing so. Some time after the usual period for the commencement of the performance the audience became rather impatient, and cries of " the\ cause," "the cause" because general. Some of the gentleinei, subscribers to the opera, then went behind the curtain, in order to ascertain "the cause" of the delay, and if possible to provide the remedy. This they soon discovered to be the absence of au orchestral leader. Mr. George Byton was requested to assume that post; but, not having rehearsed, or even heard the music performed, he was unwilling to undertake the task. However, he at last complied with the request made to him, and it would be an act of injustice not to acid that he led the orchestra iu an able and effective mangier. The cause of the marquis's absence, we regret to learn, arose from some pecuniary difficulties connected with his manage ment of the company. They are, we are informed, but of a trilling character, which it is hoped his benefit next week will altogether remove. We believe Monday night is fixed on, and on that night. the lessees make no charge for the rent of the theatre, and all the performers, both vocal and instrumental, have tendered him their services gratuitously. The expense of preparing these entertainments has been, necessarily ,very heavy; its general excellence is in some degree proved by the liberal support it has received; and we therefore bolo., as the benefit nights of the principal performers have been well attended, that the appeal of the marquis will be equally successful. Of thi., indeed, we cannot and will not entertain a doubt; to do so, would be pre-supposing that those who encouraged the opening of an Italian Theatre here, are disposed to sin ink from the pro per support of it. Giulietta e Romeo, and 11 Corradivo, will be performed this evening, for the benefit of Mous. Devin, the stage-manager. That up inconvenience may be felt from the length of the per formances, the theatre will be opened at six, and the opera will commence at seven o'clock. SUPPLY OF WATER FOR LIVERPOOL. In Mr. Thomas Moore's letter, which appeared in this paper on Friday, the 6th instant, reference was made to ' an appendix, part of which we now subjoin :- 4n imperfect account of Fires, which have taken place in Liverpool, from Dec. 22, 1831. to Feb. 20, 1435, inclusive. Names of Estimated Level of Leeds • Premises or Owners. Loss. and Liverpool Canal. Hey woods, .... £35,681 12 ft. below' li ugh Bulien's, Date of Fire. 1831, Dec. 22, 1832, 29, Aug. 18, 26, Where Situated. Water-street and Fenwick-street. Vauxhall road. Tat,ley-street and Wapping. Regent-road, Warehouse. •••• Between St. James's Market and South Dispensary. • ... Seel-street. •••• Drury-lane. •••• Stanley-st reet. .••• New Quay and Lancelot's-hey. Fourteen Warehouses—E2B,ooo. Seven Dwelliugs—£2ooo. Merchandise-168,000. Seel-street. •••• Spirit Vaults. .. • • Old Haymarket. Miltoa-street, Scotland-road. Peach-street, Abercromby-square. Dale-street. •••• Coal Yard, Canal Bank. Gibraltar-row. •••• New-street. •••• Vernon-street. •••• Bath-street. •••• Scotland-rpad, five or six lives lost. Matthew-street. •••• Canning-street. •••• Fenwick-street. Waterloo-road, Clarence Dock. Prince's Dock. •••• Richmond-row. Dale-street. • • • • King-street Soho. Gloucester-street. London-road. . • • Mauesty-lane. Alaguire-street. Cornhill. Pownall-square. •••• Orange-court. Lancelot's-hey. •••• Fleet-street. Redeross-street. Berry-st rect. • • • • Castle Mills, Meadow-street. £2600 Watson and Pims, Eslen and others, Sept. 2-1, Nov. 17, Honley and Eyrea, PierpointB, Dec. 5, 1833, 29, Jan. 14, Sundry Persons, •• • • £198,000 •• ' ' Holmes, Old Dock, Danson's, Cropper's, Muckleroy's Yards, Golden Lion inn, Standish and Case, Dover's, Godfrey's, Dicker's, Murphy's, Fairhurst's, Brancker's, Storey's, Feb. 19, March 26, April 2, 11, £3OOO £lOOO iNlay 7, 24, July 4, 8, Aug. 10, Dec. 20, 21, 1831, 23, Jan. 21, Feb. 10, 17, City of Dublin Co., Carpenter's Yard, Unfinished Buildings, Allanvin's, Swinburn's, Mercer's, Burton and Watson's, Porter's, Bullin's, Clark& Nixon's Yard, Dawson's, Price's, Dover's, Burley and. Hunt, Forshaw and Owen's, Mesdames Stewart, BirdS, J. Atherton & Wade's Warehouse, March 14, April 3, 16, May 31, June 11, 16, Aug. 8, 27, Sep. 26, Oct. 10, 28, Dec.' 2, Dec. 20, 1835, Jan. 3, 4, 22, 31, Feb. 20, .... £40,000 £ 10(X► £6OO £l2OO . ... £30,000 Level. Lerel. V 5,000 L 3500 Covent-gar den. St. Andrew-street. .... Foster and Stewart, Lawton-street and Cropper-street. John Rice's Mill, Pall-mall. •••• Oil Gas Works, Rose-hill. •••• 11. Small, Engineer, Stanley-street. •••• Foster and Griflin'l Beckwith-street. •••• Iron Foundry, •••• Jones's Soapery. Canning-street. •••• Total Loss as far as it can he ascertained £359,000 to £400,000 in three years and two months. £ )00 £3OOO LIST OF LEVELS Taken froin the curb-stone at the south-cast corner of the Dry or Canning Dock, Liverpool, which approach nearest to the Level of the Top Water, or overflow of the Leeds and Liver pool Canal, which is 33 feet 06 decimals above the said curb stone, and of course might be rendered available in aid of a Fire-police in all situations below that elevation : NAMES OF STREETS, Levels Top water of Commencing at the north end of above curb- the Leeds and the town. stone S.E. Liverpool Canning Dk. Canal. Above. Beloit. ft. de. ft. dc. ft. dc. Regent-street—Dive-lane 27 43 563 0 0 „ West end of 2d warehouse 2 35 27 0 0 221 Rice Mills, Chisenhale-street--1-way between 1 38 56 0 0 550 the Bridge and Love-lane, ) Love-lane 31 27 179 0 0 Great no„ ard-street—Denisou-street,:3o 93 213 0' 0 ~ Gibraltar-row 33 24 0 0 008 Dutton-street—Bath-street fl Canal Curbstone 35 30 0 0 224 Canal top water average of two lines 33 06 Datum. of levels, Union-street—Oldhall-street .. 35 30 0 0 334 Jackson-lane 32 63 143 0 0 Queen-street — from Oldhall-street —3l 21 0 0 118 ~ Jackson-lane 29 71 335 . 0 0 Tithebarn-street—Exchange-st. East, 31 40 166 0 0 Hackin's-hey .. —33 43 8 0 037 Moor-fields—Dale-street 23 '.-8 928 0 0 „ 3 yards below the School, 3l 03 0 0 097 Great Crossbali f street—Standish-st., 35 36 0 0 230 Trueman-street 3l 8:i 122 0 0 Addison-street, Fontenoy-street 31 31 175 0 0 25 yards above Do 35 30 0 0 221 Scotland-road—Milton-street 27 08 598 0 PP Rose-place Hunter-street—St. Stephen-street ....27 35 571 0 0 Spencer's-buildings ...43 13 0 3 10 7 Richmond-row—Pepper-street 32 59 047 0 0 Thurlow-street 43 19 0 0 10 13 Shaw's-brow-24 Gateway Northside 27 9.3 513 0 0 „ Passage to St. J.'s Church 40 48 0 0 742 St. John's-lane—Roe-street 3l 37 169 0 0 Lime-street 45 38 0 0 12 32 Great Charlotte-street—Elliott-street 33 04 0 2 0 _0 —........ ......___ ~ Ranelagh-street 36 43 0 0 337 Ranelagh-street—Lawton-street 22 95 10 11 0 0 o Great Charlotte-street 36 25 0 0 3 1 9 Bold-street—Lveeuni Steps 2B 35 471 0 0 „ Concert-street .... 39 97 0 0 691 Slater-street—Parr-street 35 29 0 0 223 „ Duke-st.corner of Suffolk-st 32 94 012 0 0 Duke-street—Suffolk-street Kent-street 43 12 0 0 10 6 Grenville-street—Kent-street 29 40 360 0 0 „ Cornwallis-street 4l 78 0 0 872 Park-lane—Blundell-street3l 41 165 0 0 „ Bridgewater-street 39 71 0 0 665 Brick-street, St. James's—Jamaica-st 34 67 0 0 161 9, Simpson-street 28 40 466 0 0 P a rliament-street—Flint-street 26 38 668 0 0 lit Grafton-street 36 36 0 0 330 Warwick-street—Sefton-street l2 63 20 43 0 0 Grafton-street 5O 83 0 0 17 80 Extract from the Report of the Fire Insurance Agents, December, It is quite requisite, however, that some understanding should now be adopted with regard to the expenses for which the in surance offices are to be liable hereafter, and also as to the claims of the Norwich Union and West of England offices, whose charges accompany this. .Upon minute investigation the agents are of opinion, that the amount now raised by act of par liament is quite inadequate to support an effective fire police establishment for Liverpool. The commissioners have, at pre sent, the power of levying only a halfpenny in the pound on the parish assessment for the establishment, which will not raise more than from £lOOO to £llOO per annum; and the estimate of their annual expenses is as follows: — Superintendent's salary, and rent of his house . £2OO Forty-four established men, at £5 each Clothes for ditto, at £3 each .4 t; 5C 1 - y . E.) . c 5 r .0 T.,- Ct Cr 3 Diameter I . tz ,, :oo ,=„ c qe,:,—, nt•hes. SIR HOWARD DOUGLAS, BARONET. The St Andretr:v Standard, New Brunswick—what a nume rous family the STANDARD are becoming--!-of February 12, notices the receipt of Liverpool papers to the 2nd January, and after exulting in the probable return of Sir HoWard Douglas to the House of Commons as one of the members the borough of Liverpool, proceeds to say:— " People fancy that it is the interest of those who partake of the loaves and fishes, to keep things as they are, and by all means to contravene things as they ought to be, and smne even go so far as to say it cannot. be expected that half-a-dozen officials in the comfortable possession of two or three thousands a year, a ould disturb their ease—their (glum rum dignitate, and abridge their princely incomes by suggesting measures which arc. impertinently called for by an insiguiticant population of only one hundred thousand persons! NS , e would object to these suspicions and declarations, did we not recollect the firm stand taken by our present honourable and eminently patriotic speaker, when he successfully urged the house of assembly (in which it was joined by the Council) to address the throne on matters of vital importance to the province, the consideration of which he alleged was quashed in the colonial office—and this recollection induces us to pause before we reject the allegations made of sinster proceedings here. Hence arises our earliest solicitude for the success of Sir. Howard Douglas in obtaining a seat in parliament. We think it far from chimerical to expect that the splendid talents of the gallant baronet would speedily bring him into office. And who is there that is interested in the permanent welfare of this province who wish that that office • should be the secretaryship for. the coloneies ? This may he a selfish sentiment, but according to the modern axiom " patriotism end-self interest have met t.gerher, right and redress have embraced earls other." We think that the acumen of Sir Howard's peceptions and the unbendi ng aus terity of his e rmciples afford as a guarantee that he would ex ecute his hign calling unaffected by the oblique motives of the adherents of misrule, and i m pervious to the insinuations which might mislead a theoretical minister who had not the advantage of his profound practical acquaintance with our wants and re sources." AWFULLY Sooner/ I) Last night, about ten o'clock, Mr. Maurice Hints, a well-known auctioneer in this town, died in an awfully sudden manlier. The unfortunate gentleman,. Yesterday afternoon returned from Manchester, where he had been selling, and went to Mr. Roger Backhouse's, the William IV, in Williamson-square, to supper. He ate heartily of mus= cles, and afterwards f elt himself sick. Ile pl ace d hi s h an d to his chest, complained of illness, and walked front the supper a r osoumrgteooann in adjoining u eig. room, when he fell down. M r . J e ff ries, hbourhood, was promptl y sent for, but be fore he arrived Mr. !lime had breathed his last. Ile has left A wife and seven or eight children to deplore their loss. Tun New Pot.ice BILL.—On Wednesday last the eighteen commissioners entrusted with the management of the lamp, watch, and scavenging department of the town's business held an unadvertised meeting of their body, for the purpose of taking into consideration the propriety of opposing tht bill now Wore parliament, for the better regulation of the town police. No public notice whatever of such a raveling having been given, it was, of course , strictly private, hut we understand that after a lengthened squabbling conversation, "the eighteen representa tives of the whole town " came to the resolution of forwarding a petition to the House of Commons, to he presented by Mr. Ewart, against the bill, and it was forwarded by mail the same night. The resumed grounds of opposition to so desirable an improvement in our local police which the new bill would be the :neans of enforcing, is said to he, that as the inhabitants are anticipating a change in the constitution of the corporation, it would be better to regulate and improve the police of the town whets that change has taken place. Mr. Thomas Bolton has also a petition of a similar nature "from the inhabitants of Liverpool," with which he is deputed to proceed to London thin day. It has not yet transpired from what potion of the in habitants Mr. Thomas Bolton's petition emanates, as it has not made its appearance on the Exchange, nor,oll any other public place, nor has it lain for the inhabitants to affix their signatures. DUBLIN Ihilverisury.—ln the list of those who attained to the rank of senior moderator at their degree examination, and who were presented with gold medals at the• late commence ments, and also among the vice-chancellor's prize-meu, we observe the name of Mr. Harold H. Sherlock, a young gentle man of Liverpool. It is said that the Duke of Gordon has received an anovmous letter, stating that if Ll,OOO be given instead of the £tXO offered, the stolen jewels will be restored. CHURCH REFORM. (From the Standard of Wednesday.) The Report of the Ghurch Reform Commissioners is to be presented to the houses of parliament this evening. It is. we are informed, an elaborate and most ably drawn up document. The commissioners have digested the voluminous and complicated details of the impoitant subjects committed to them under the three several heads of territor . ., in come, and patronage. Under the head territory are ex plained the new arrangements of dioceses proposed, of which the following are amongst the most interesting:— It is proposed to erect two new bishoprics—one of Manchester, the other of Ripon. The greater part of the new diocese of Manchester is to be taken from the present diocese of Chester. The archdiocese of York to supply the new diocese of Ripon. The number of bishops in the House of Lords will not, however, be increased, for it is proposed to unite the bishoprics of Bristol and Landaff, the out-lying part of the diocese of Bristol in Wilts and Dorset to pass to • the. diocese of Salisbury ; and also to unite the sees of Bangor and St. Asaph. It is likewise proposed to deprive the see of London of those parts of .the metropolitan diocese which lie in Essex ancrHerts, giving to London in return all that, in the represented metropolitan districts, which now be longs to Canterbury or Winchester, so as to make the diocese nearly coextensive with the represented metro polis. Essex is to be transferted to the bishopric of Ro chester. These are th e most striking territorial changes pro- 1 posed. There are many more arrangements under the same head, but we have not time to detail them all, and with out a map the greater number would be scarcely intelli gible. The principle of the proposed refcrm being to adjust as nearly as may be the incomes of the bishops to their several stations and duties, the proposed arrangements in this respect may be surmised from what we have said of territory. Patronage must still more closely attend the changes to be made in the distribution of dioceses. We are gra tified to be able, however, to say that all the commis sioners, including the lord chancellor,•have agreed to surrender their patronage, for the purposes contem plated in the report; and there is every reason to hope that this example will be universally followed by the right reverend bench, and all the official patrons of church livings. As an example of the mode in which it is intended that this patronage shall be employed, we may mention the cases of the prebends in Westminster and Canterbury that have lately fallen in. The parish of St. Margaret's, Westminster, is to he divided, and the income of the present parochial minis ter being added to the income of the prebend, one-half of the aggregate is to be allocated to each of the minis ters cf the divided parish. A similar arrangement has been made for Canterbury. The outline which we have given is slight, but it is faithful. PUBLIC CHARACTERS OF LIVUHPOOI., No. I.—Mr. Tovey, a • 'very clever young artist of this town, published yesterday the .first of a series of lithographic portraits, which are to be con tinued weekly. The portrait noiv before us will instantly be recognised by all who are accustomed to visit the Town - ha ll, or, are acquainted with the magisterial bench of Liverpool, as a capital likeness of our worthy chief magistrate. From the . ex pression of the face we should suppose that the portrait was taken while his worship was sitting in the judgment-seat. We congratulate Mr. Tovey on the successful commencem ent of his work. To keep i❑ good repair seven engines and water carts ... 200 Horses constantly kept £902 No charge is made for rent by the corporation. A very small balance, therefore, is at their disposal fur contingencies at all the fires which may occur during the year. An extract from the act of parliament which govern the Man chester fire police in their charges is submitted herewith, and also a letter from the comptroller of that establishment, with the particulars of their charges for the use of engines. Superintendent's charges at Liverpool:— EXTRA MEN. No. 1 engine takes 32 men, and the money charged gives} £76 31 67-96 men for 96 hours, at Gd. per hour D• liable to injury or d es t ruc - Low Estimate of Property in Liverpool, tion front fre, from the best data' that can be obtained. Rental of the parish, on which the rates for the year £ 1832 were assessed by regular survey for that year, £807,619, taking 10 years purchase on the amount for the insurable value of the buildings ... 8,076,190 Number of vessels which entered the port in 1834, 13,444; tonnage, 1,69'2,870, say 1-12 for vessels in dock at one time, equal to 141,072 tons, at £l2 per ton • •••• 1,692,864 Estimate of the value of the principal articles of East and West India, American, and other produce. or stock, at Liverpool, on the 31st day of Dec., 1834, taken at low weights and rates 3,083,974 Duty on rum, 1,1:,9,000 oails., at 75...... £188,150 Do. on tobacco, 10,155,260 lbs., at 3s. 1,523,280 1,911,434 (Which would be lost to government in case of de struction by fire.) Stock of grain 21st Oct. 1834, estimated at 498,300 Irish produce,—beef, ILI, butter, lard, pork, &c., in 1832; vauledby Mr. Porter for the House of Com mons, the latest account published, £1,125,227, 1-6 in stock, present, Timber deals, &c., though the quantity is consider able, not very liable to fire, except when stowed in buildings Stock-in-trade of all shopkeepers Plate, linen, and furniture in the town ...... Goods in transitu in the town warehouses an Produce of all kinds, and manufactures, in th not landed 1.(X)0,000 2,000,000 I docks 1,000,000 docks 1,000,000 £20,450,295 •-j- . 2 4 a. CGV g cR r- ; '44.. w—w o -C3 -° t r. • 4 ZZIR t 1 4; 2 2. „rt. c-Cs; t. S •^* 0 g t . `43q ET . R) C C l4:.i • erg C 4 - .1. aa" c.- c'"Ercr7. 'ern Fc, •."q 110 v. 1 .5 ,-, • ^ C CO O • . )7 a tc - 73 .7 7 : !,)-= .; "., ~ 4 :4 cq :si c*: :t ct e.,l='-7 4 .= , 00=0 •siaa4s, a4l Iluppulan pus `litintnnaq ATIIA2 , I Io asnadx7 .itot,t.^. , - , m,c . am c.Roooo=oo--. Z ==. O : 4 g e ..., cz G; g g ... . 4 . ..., cr2 8 0 t---- :-.-, 0 ..:3 - 4. ~ 44 c -4 c E-4 U 2 4 ;r4 75. /I t t ...., -4 ,;-: Tr •er -a , = :-^ co ,?, co M C.l`. rt . , ••••• E-V4 c7i c 4 • Zcsl =.l==•=o.=-4--.... 4 ;1 .°