Northern Times. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1857-12-28 00:00:00

POLICE INTE CE-LLIGE_! , .7 SAT URD A Y LIVERPOOL. BEFORE MR. R GLADETONE. A FlGllT.—Joseph Anton, Patrick Carley, and Mary and Elizabeth Acton, were charged by officer 420 for a riot and assault. About three o'clock on Christmas morning there W 4,9 a "jolly good fight" in Nc'rth•street, when the officer interfered, and was assaulted by Joseph Acton in a severe manner. He was knockeu down and beaten with a poker. The females tried to rescue the risoner. The evidence against Curley was not sr,ffic;ent. and he was, dische.rged. The two women were fined 24. 61 each, and seph Acton was fined £2, or, in default, two months' imprisonment THE FORCE OF CUSTOM !—Amongst a large number of persons vitio were charged for being drunk and fighting. and riotous conduct, on Christmas eve, were two young men, who were charged with assaulting the police, for being drunk, and so on. Mr. Black appeared for the prisoners, and said he was instructed to say that it was $ regular custom for penile to g-et drunk on Christmas eve Mr. Cr•adstone: Ye', the custom mikes brutes of them. I am very i . ifr6n much influenced by the able argam , :nta of Mr. Black, hut iu tbis he has not sucta:ecled in convincing me. The prisoners were fined 104 each. SeNAGEs!—John Ravel , ' a mason. charged two bro7hers. named William and john Foley, with having committed a desperate outrage on him. It appeared that some time Ego the complainant was a witness against some friends of the prisoners, and thy vowed vengeance against him. 0 a Thursday night they met him in Wi kinsomstreet, when John Foley kniNeked h;rn down, an• William felt down on him, and c-ifehing his n-ee in his moui.h, bit nearly the whole of that otg:in off his face. Surgeon Pope, of the Southern Hospital, ,aid the nose was bitten quit. through. and only held together by a small portion of skin—there was scarcely a doubt but the man would lose his nose. The prisoners were remanded ftr a week SANDING TAa C aTli is —Mr. Murdock, a pawnbroker, carrying on baminesa in Mrrybone, charged two pert one, named Anne MG:man and J-mei Riley. under the follow ing circuniFtantte :—He said he went from his private residence on Christmas :ay, to his house of bui.iness. to see all right, and on his arrival, he was. vary muc't astonished to find the shop doer open, and on entering, ho found both the prisoners in the place very drunk The woman was a servant in the shop, and the police recrgni,;ed the man as a well-known " garotter " The complainant said there Was nothing taken from the shop, and he did not wish to pres.g the case, but as a warning the prisoners were cau tioned and discharged. BXFORIC MR. J, ATKiN. THE CORN ROBBERY —Joseph Maley, and George Bebbington, were brought up by cfficers Laycock and Eaton of the detective police, on a remand:el charge of having stolen seven bag 4 of wheat belenging to Messrs. Allan and Gillespie, and John Farrell, a marine store dealer, in Newport-street, was chatged with receiving it with a guilty knowledge. Mr. Duck was for Farrell, and Mr. Goodere for the other two prisoners. In cur paper of Thursday the full d e tails of this case were published. The evidence was gone into de novo. Officer Layeock, was cross-examined by Mr. Blur.k, and said he did not know aeThit g wr! . ,ng against Farrell, and that he at once admitted that he had purehased the corn ; he di i not conceal anything, and so far as he knew he was a respectable man. Oae of Messrs. Allan and Gillespie's clerks, in reply to Mr Goodere, raid Bebbington, as the inferior officer of Braley, would bi exonseated by obeying his orders. In reply to the bench, the witness said the prisoner must know there was somethirg dishonest in the ease, Mr. Goodere here interfered. when His Worehip seid his interference inclined him very much to conclude that he must seed the prisoner to another cou-t. The witness, in reply to Mr. Bluek, sail en ref rents to the books in the office he found th,t Braley had sold some sweepings to Farrell previously. He was not aware that any sweepings had gone to Mr. Gill , epie's farm on the day the seven bags was taker. Some of the clerks from the office of Messrs. Allen stated that Braley had no authority to sell any corn or sweepings. Mr. Black then addressed the court oe beh ,lf of Farrell. and said he was a man of high character and had told the truth all th , ough. The prisoners were sent for trial, but His Worship admitted Far-ell to bail in two sureties of £5O each, and Bebbington was admitted to bail in two sureties in I 25 each. [ln the course of the above case, Mr. Goodere a-k - d to have the depositions tai en down, as the witnesses were examined, according to the opinion of Mr Just ea Weight man. Mr. Garnett said if such a cantle were adopted, it would require twelve stipendiary magistrates for the court. Mr. Aikin said he was astonished at the accuracy with which the clerks took down the evidence, If Mr. Goodere 'wished he would have an opportunity of having his cross exemination taken down afterwards. Mr. Goodere then made a loud c :mplaint that a second magistrate could net be had in the County Magistrate-,' Court, in Basnett street, and that, in consequence, the twenty-seven sailors who were charged with a mutiny on board a ship in the river had to be remanded until Monday, Mr. Aikin said ho had nothing to do with such an affair BIRKENHEAD, BEFORE E. BRYANS, ESQ. A CANDIDATE volt THE LOCK-UP.—James Rogers, a strong rough-looking latouring man, who works about the coal yards in this town, was charged with breaking the window of Mr. Bates, who keeps he Golden Lion in Chester-street. The prisoner entered the vaults on Christmas day, between 10 and 11 at night. Mr. Bates, seeing that he was very drunk, very properly refused to serve him with anything more. Prisoner then became very abusive and annoying to the other costumers, upon which he was desired to leave the place ; this he refused to do. and Mr. Bates came round to the front of the bar to put him out, upon which he seized Mr. Bares, and threw him down, who would have been roughly handfed, but for the interference of two or three men, who assisted in ejecting the prisoner. Prisoner tried to get in again, finding he could not do so, he very deliberately smashed a window, the cost of which was 10s. in so doing he cut his hand very severely. He was then given into custody b u t, previous to his being locked up, it was found necessary to have his hand dressed, As it was blesding very freely Ordered to p , y 103 damage and costs, or twenty-one days in the House of Correction. The prisoner is a most dangerous character, having, since 1837, been in custody no less than seventeen times on a variety of charges from " ssfety” to highway robbery. ENIMIES TO MIL•NER'S SAM—John Evans and William Atkins, two kaowing.lookieg elves, who were brought up on Wednesday last as suspicious characters, under the following c'rcumstances. were this day again placed in the dock. Detec ive officer Hodgson stated that in the course of his usual evening ex ercise on Tuesday last he happened to catch sight of the two prisoners, and a third man going in and out of shops and public house;. He (Hodson) having an eye to business, watched them and made inquiries where they had been, the result of which was he found in four or five ins'anc?s, that for every twopenneworth of spirits or svne they invariably changed a sovereign. Hodson knew that changing of soveregns was no crime, or the ascertaining where the cash box was kept from which change was given them, bat he did knew that sometimes during the busy time of evening cash boxes very efesn "mizzled " in a most mysterious manner, consequently he took them into custody as suspicious characters When before the magistrate on the first occasion they both protected against being taken into custody, as they were respectable tradesmen, Atkins stet. ing that he was a brass-founder, and then staying at 27, Parliament -street, Liverpool, as al assistant to his brother, a licensed hawker, before which he was living at Shrews bury, and Evans stating that he was a stationery hawker, and lived a 28, York-street, Glasgow, before which he resided in a new street, when being formed, in Newcastle • under-Lyre ; but which, ashen be left had not been named. It ran from one end of the town to the other. The apparent plausible mauner in which each told his tale, induced the ma gistrate to put them down until Saturday last, for inquiry, the resnl`, of which was, that the two "respectable tradesmen" were so wall known as to be described, in the book kept at the main brit!ewell, Liverpool, as "John Evans, alias Frede rick Hicks," in custody there four times, and " Wtn. Atkins, alias Tudor," five times in the same prison. In addition, one of the Birkenhead police, named Gregory, who was formerly in the Manchester police, was also in attendance to identify Atkins, as a well known thief in that town. To day Mr. Black appeared on their behalf, and having admitted that they were not respectable men as they had described themselves to be, said that, in this instance, he did not think they had committed such an offence as t bring them within the Vagrant Act, so as to werrant the worthy a magistrate i n sen di ng t h em to pr i t i en . M r B ryans !aid their conduct was very suspicious, to say the least of it, but he did not, in this instance, intend sending them to prison. They must , how ever , b e caut i ous is their future conduct oa this side of the water. He then dis Charged them. A WARNING TO DA T NYMEN.—NearIy all of Ton head of Cal Twomey ; well, 1 was at his wake ; End . jist es tb, women were tittle' down after keenin,' the dead man sit up on his elbow on the table ; every soul of us ran for the bare life, for we thought 'twits the Ould Boy was emni u , t o ea , U 3 all ; bat Cal, poor soul, told them all to step quite as thyy wor, " tor," said he, " I'm not goin to hurt any of you, I'm not, and I'm not goin to atop with you either. but I'm goin to give you all one advice—never sell water in milk to any oue, %is the greatest sin in the world, and if you knew where the water-s tiers go yen would never do it," and he laid down again, and said no more, and he was uried dap.—lrish Literary Gazette. EXTRAORDINARY CHLRGE OF PERJURY. day. I won't swear one way or the other. We might have stayed sometimes for an hour and a half alone. Mr. Serjeant Bytes : What did you do during that length of time ? Witness : I suppose that I talked to him as I worked, and he to me, the same as other visitors. Mr. Serjeant Ryles Have you ever been with him when the blinds have been down? Witness: I never noticed them. I never made a note of it. It the sun was shining, no doubt the blinds were down. Mr. Serjeant Byles : Will you undertake to say, when he has come in, you have never pulled down the blind ? Witness : I don't recollect; I cult not undertake to sneak for any one but myself. It T found the sun disagreeable, I might have pulled them down. Mr. Sergeant B, les : Can you undertake to say that you have not pulled the blinds down when he came in ? Witness : No ; I cannot say one way or the other. If the sun was eisagreeable, no doubt I did it. I recollect visiting at Miss Maxwell's once. Ido not remember going into the garden. I. had a sprained ankle at the time, and could hardly go from the earriege to the drawing-room. I know nothing about the locality. My sister walked in the g rden, , e) far as I can remember. She was between eleven and t , eelee year,' of roe at that time. I had three sisters, Finny, Emma, and Clara. Emma is married. Fenny din in 1846. Clara is un married. In AtlqU3t, when me sister was in Dublin, I and Mr. Robinson were in Che:„enlem. When at Edge ware-road T did not go with the defendant to Hampton Court. I did in 1852. Re-examined : The defendant was one of my 'father's oldest friends. Since my husbend has deserted me he has never called upon me in London. In my rides with the defendant I invariably started from my father's house. I never pulled down the blinds for an improper purpose, neither has the defendant. Lord Campbell : D you recellect your father having a servant named Crest ? Witness : No. Lord Camehell : DJ you remember at any time when he was in your father's service your leaving the room with your little brother ? Wienese I don't remember. had a little brother, and no doubt 'I left the room with him. REV. J. K. GLAZEBROOK TO TUE REV coußr OF QUEEN'S BENCH. J. MACNAUGHT. THE QUEEN V. ROBINSON. TO THE EDITOR or TIES NORTHERN TIMES, Sin—Punctuation is an art not to be trifled with, for, if you are not punctilious in all points, you may heat of it afterwards. I was amusing myself ore day with a comma of Mr. Macneught's, not that I intended to take it away, but only thinking what might happen if it were removed, and you see what a storm I have raised. Sad is the condi tion of your compositors, Mr. Editor. to be daly in danger of encountering auehors infuriated in these sore points. Now, sir, Pll just tell you how the matter occurred. tin that ill-fated day, 2nd of December last, I quoted Mr. M.'s words, " I trust Mr. G. will henceforth remember that I aril, like him-. self, in position, though not in opinion, a clergyman cif the Established Church of England." The gram matical meaning of theso words, I venture to affirm, ir, that Mr. M. is " not in opinion, a clergyman, & However, I did not suppose he was candid enough to acknowledge this, and I took it to be an error in the mode of expressing himsslf, and I said,— " And it is remarkable that his own words may he understood to confess his deliequency on this point." Now, having only stated the possibility of attaching this meaning to these words, and marked the word may in italics, I cannot perceive what grave offence 1 committed. I did not insist upon what is evidently the grammatical meaning, and in this case I was studious to Observe the laws of honourable antagonism, for I hold that every anent of the intellectual gladiator which is not made " secundum artem:' ought to recoil upon himself. Now, Sir, see the return which I have received for what I fondly conceived to be the c , )urtesy of a true knight. After ellareieg me with (36n fesseil artifice," Mr. M. says—" 1 am bound to say that the moral—not to say religious —con dition of mind which is indicated by etteh a ' con• fession' as this, is deplorable indeed.'' This great crime is charged upon me in various ways, in the course of Mr. M.'s letter of the 12th December. It gives me trouble enough to deal with the cool perversions of Mr. M., but it is a still harder task to deal with the misrepresentations and falsehoods of blind rage. Alas! Mr. Editor, not charity itself, but the cant of charity, is characteristic of that infidel school to which Mr. M. belongs. A boasting pretence to the chief Christian grates, is part of the simulated fo:m of an Angel of Light, which Satan arid his ministers wear, in order to deceive, if it were possible, the very elect. The counterfeit grace, however, cannot, like that which is true, exercise long enduring patience A slight pro vocation destroys all the illusion, and removes the mask, and the counterfeit avenges herself for past self - restraint, and indulges in all manner of misrepresentation, perversion, falsehood, and bitter revilings. But Mr. M. goes on to say, "Mr G.'s letter of this morning, like the rest of his epistles, is remarkable for the way in which he ignores the arguments I have advanced." I assure Mr. M , that I have not willingly evaded any argument that required an answer. Some of Mr. M.'s arguments fortunately answer themselves. But even with this involuntary help from Mr. M., I am still made deeply sensible of a saying attributed, if I remember rightly, to Dr. S. Johnson " Plus negabit," said the amazed Dr., " plus negabit unas asinus in una Nora, quaa centunt philosophi proboverint in centum mints." "An unwise man will deny more in one hour, than a hundred philosophers have proved in a hundred years." Mr. M. will observe that I have' used the word " unwise' in my translation, as being nearer the truth, and because I do not wish to be uncourteous, even in a quotation, when necessity does not require it, wishing, as I do, to have some of " that wisdom that is from above, which is first pure, and then peaceable," &e,—James iii., 17. In future, then, if I am obliged, through the cress of matter, to leave some points untoualsed, I would beg to plead, on bar of judgment, "Plus negabit." And this reminds me, Mr. Editor, of that long letter of Mr. M.'s of December B—you cannot but remember it—about the Sicilian Vespers and Socrates. This was in reply to mine of December 5. Iu order to show how impossible it is that reason can be the rule of faith, I ralerred to the testimony afforded by the past and present history of heathen supersti tions and abominations, and the " credulity, contradiction and absurdity of an infidel's creed." I quoted from 1 Cor., 21, the inspired declaration that " the world by wisdom knew not." Thie unequivocal testimony, we might expect, would settle the matter at once. But no, tho " inner light " must be followed, as superior to Scripture ; and as to the facts, " so much the worse for them?' Mr. M., with undaunted courage, sets himself to work out a " very curious argument " to contradict the oracle of God, and to render the facts of no avail. In conclusion, he says, as it were, in triumph, on contemplating the perfection of his Q. E. D : " This appeal was of his own choosing. His argu ment was, I trow, a sadly frail one." "And if this be so, said I not rightly, at the first, that Reason had been appointed by God the sovereign judge over all rules of Faith—yea, over all judges, save God himself alone." Now, sir, you will probably remember the story of an advocate who having made a long and elaborate speech, and who secretly congratulated himself on his success and the evident certainty of obtain ing a verdict in his favour, finding, on sitting down, that to the mortification and horror of his amazed client, he had been all along arguing on the wrong side. To the credit of that advocate it is said, you remember, that, "changing hie side as a lawyer knows how," ho rose and said, " such, gentlemen of the jury, is the sophistical and flimsy argument with which my learned brother will endeavour to mislead you, and then went on very dexterously refuting himself?' Now, sir, when I first received that monster argument, in reply to This was a criminal proceeding against the defendant, a gentleman of property, residing at Cheltenham, for perjury, arising out of the celebrated crim. con. case of Evans v. Robinson, tried at Liverpool. Ms. Serjeant Byles, Mr. Huddlestone, Q C , and Mn Hawkins and Mr. Harrison were counsel for the prosecu. thin; Sir F. Tiresiger, Mr. James, Q.C., and Mr. Hodgson were counsel for the defendant, The perjury eomplained of arose out of a suit in the Ecclesiastical Court, for adultery with Mrs. Evans, the wife of a gentleman of property residing its Gloucester. shire. The perjury had reference to the defendant's conduct in having had improper intimacy with the prosecu'or's wife, both belere and after their marriage. The unfortunate lady was a Miss Carrington, daughter of Mr. Carrington, a gentleman residing in Lansdowne terrace, Cheltenham, aed occupying a respectable position in society. The defendant was a person of res,pectsbiliry, and was a magistrate for the borough of Cheltenham. The defendant, who was a married man, lived separa'e from his wile, on the ground, a, represented, of incompatibility of temper. At Cheltenham, the defendant became acquainted wit h Mr. Carringten's family, which, it was alleged, was abused by him in taking an opportunity of ingratiating himself with Miss Carrington, who was tnen about t cventy-three years of ate, which led to his kissing her, and other acts of familiarity which, it was :sneered, left no doubt. of the character of the inti macy between them, and which had been repeated en several occasions after rearriaee, and after the separation of Mrs, Evans, both in London and in the country. The action for crim. con. had been twice tried. In the first case the verdict was for the defendant, but on the second occasion it etas for the plaintiff, 500 t daraistes. Mr. Serjeant Byles, i-i stating the case to the jury, observed that some little diffieultv woul I arise in proving the perjury, because in the Ecclesiastical Court the evidence was taken in private, in " a little dark room," and sworn to after. The perjury complained of was that the defendant in that court had srsern that —n I am now prepared solemnly to swear that neither before nor atter the marriage did I take indecent or improper liberties with her" In consequence of that affidavit, the prose cutor could not obtain a decree to proceed with his application for divorce, and these proceedings had been rendered necessary for the accomplishment of that object. Mr. Serjeant Byles having fully stated the case, The deposition was read at full length. In it he denied having said at the club, at Cheltenham, in neference to Evans' marriage whh Miss Carrington% " Evans is a slippery fish, but I think I've hooked him at last." The deposition also stated that he had not taken improper liberties with Mrs. Evans, either before or after her marriage with the prosecutor. A great number of witnesses were examined, who deposed to certain acts of familiarity between the defend ant and Mrs. Evans, but the following evidence was given for the defence : Mrs. Evans, a lady-like person. She was dressed in black, and appeared at first very nervous. She deposed ; I was married to-Mr. Evans in 1850. The defendant has known the family since 1342, arid was a most intimate friend of the family. lam turned 32 years of age. Mr. Robinson'e mother resides in Cumberland—street, where he lives part of the year, and the other at Cheltenham, The defendant called at my father's whenever he liked. He was accustomed to rife with me and the family. Lord Campbell: What is the age_ of the defendant?: Mr. Janses : About 49. Witness continued : My father did not keep a riding horse for use, and I always rode the defendant's black mare. I was about 17 when I first knew him. I was married Nov. 14, 1850. I became engaged to him in Sept. of the same year. Mr. Robinson had no hand whatever in that engagement. He resided at the time at Cheltenham with Ws wife. After the marriage I resided with my husband in Leicester, who is fond of hunting, and kept. hunters: He deserted me in March, 1851, and the deed of separation was made in May. We disagreed about living with his mother, and when I found he would not give in, I wrote to say I would give way, but he declined to live with me. I wrote him a letter, which has never been produced. lie never assigned any other cause for leaving me. My father died en the 10th of this month, and my mother on the same day. My father gave his evidence in the Arches Court, and if he had lived he would have given evidence here. We were in the habit of corning to London, and Mr. Robinson was in the habit of taking lodgings for us—he did it on several occasions. was never in a fly with Mr. Robinson at Cheltenham. in July, 1e49. Was in Norfolk at the time, staying at Hel stead Rectory. I was never at any time in a fiy alone with Mr. Robinson, at Cheltenham, or any other place. I never left a party at Lansdowne-crescent, or any other place, with Mr. Robinson. I was always on such occasions seen home by my parents. In 18531 came to London, and lodged in the Edgeware-road with my servant. My parents knew of it. and all my movements. I asked the defendant to take lodgings for me, because my usual lodgings were occupied. I arrived at Edgeware-road on the 23rd of June, and remained there for a fortnight and a day. The defendant used to call there, and I used some times to go out with him. I never saw the defendant in possession of a latch-key whilst I was there. I never heard of it till my maid had her deposition taken. 'never knew of his coming into the house without knocking, or being announced by my maid, or Mrs. Phillips's servant. When I have gone out with him, we have walked to the parks and the Royal Academy Exhibition. He never, on such occasions, let himself in with a latch-key—he always knocked. I have read the proceedings in this case. By Mr. James : Were you ever guilty of any act of adultery with Mr. Robinson? Witness: Never. Mr. James : At any time in the evening of August 4, 1853? Witness : Never. Mr. James : Were you ever guilty of any indecency or adultery with Mr. Robinson, as deposed to by Munn ? Witness : It is utterly false. The story is utterly false from beginning 'to end. My sister Fanny was with me in Dublin in August, 1853. My father kept a memorandum book, which I was in the habit of seeing. Mr. James proposed to put in the book. Mr. Serjeant Byles objected. Lord Campbell refused to admit if. Witness : I can do Yeey well without it. My father took my sister to Dublin on the 2nd of August. There was no other sister at home then. She remained till the end of October, but my father left about the 15th August, • and my sister went on a visit to my brother-in-law, Dr, Wood, 16th Lancers, then quartered in Dublin, in 1854. I went to Bsyanstormesquare. My father and mother came up after Ina. I arrived on the 19;..11 of June. accompanied by my cousin, Mr. Mellins, a gentleman reading for the church, who had been i t the army. I think I wrote to the defendant to take apartments for Mr. Mellins and myself. My father and mother arrived on the sth July, about 5 o'clock in the afternoon. Mr. James: I will ask you this question. Dnring the time you wero in Bryanstone-square, did Mr. Robinson take any improper fausiliafities with you, or, to put the question plainly, did you commit adultery with him there ? Witness : I never did. Lord Campbell : Or take improper familiarities ? Witness : N•ver. Lord Campbell : Do you - recollectron any occasion the defendant fol'owing you? Witness: Indeed Ido not. Lord Campbell : Now, I must ask you, did the defen dant at any time upon the stairs kiss you: Witness: Indeed. not. Lord Campbell :He never did ? Witness No. The ease was resumed on Wednesday. Mr. Serjeant Bytes, in addressing the jury on the whole of the evidence, entered into a minute analysis of the evidence, urging that it was not necessary in actions for trim. con. to prove actual intercourse between the parties, but such conduct only as led to a fair and reasonable inference that it had taken place, there was abundant proof in the defendant's case to substantiate such a charge. In the course of the learned serjeent's address, he ob served, in aristocratic circles, men felt they were bound in honour not to admit that they had enjoyed the least favour of a married woman, and on that subject he feared the public mind was somewhat lax. It was perfectly clear, from eve: y day observation, that a man denied such con duct both in public and in private. He concluded by urging that the prosecution had been clearly made out. Lord Campbell, in summing up, said : This is a case that must create the greatest anxiety in all who are con nected with it, and, I may say, almost as great in the judge and jury as the parties who are interested in it. You have to decide this case on conflicting evidence upon a variety of questions, conflicting to an extent that can in no respect be reconcile and you are to say whether there has been perjury committed on one side or the other. The defendant is indicted that he committed wilful and corrupt perjury when examined as a witness in the Ecclesiastical Court in a divorce suit brought by Mr. Evans against his wife, and there are various assignments of perjutn separate and distinct from each other, which will require your special attention, and I must ask your opinion separately upon the main quesion upon which your verdict will ultimately be given. There are six questions to be decided, which I have reduced to writing for your guidance, and will leave them to you. They are, first, did the illicit intercourse, as alleged, take place between the defendant and Mrs. Evans in the fly on the Charlton-road in February, 1849 ? Second, did the defen dant speak the words in the club at Cheltenham, in 1850, imputed to him, respecting the marriage of Mr. Evans with Miss Carrington ? Third, had the defendant a latchkey while Mrs. Evans was lodging in the Edzeware-road, in JWv, 1853 ? Fourthly, did the illicit intercourse take place between the defendant and Mrs. Evans, as stated by Munn, in August, 1853? Fifth, did the illicit intercourse take place between the de ftntlant :and Mrs. Evens on the 4th and sth of July ? 1854, in Heyanstone-square; and sixth, did the defendant attempt to tamper with Mrs. King, as a witness in Aug., 1851, before the first trial at Liverpool, as stated by her ? It would be for them to answer these questions of fact. Happily, in cases of cenflictine evidence, they have to be decided by a jury, the best tribunal for such a purpose that ever was invented by the wisdom of man ; and I entreat you, in answering these questions, to be entirely guided by your own opinions formed on the evidence you have heard on both sides, bearing in mind the very able discussion the case has undergone, and the powerful speeches you have heard from the learned counsel who h - ave addressed you. It is not my habit to read over the whole of the evidence in cases tried before me, because its general tendency was to perplex rather than assist in arriving at a conc l us i on, b at in this case I feel it my bounden duty to do EO, drawing your attention to it, aud, so far as I flan, to assist you by any observations I might make in seeing its bearing and f fr.ct ; but not to influence you in any respect. The fearer] Judge then read over the evidence, which occupied several ..ours. The jury retired at 23 minutes past three o'clock to consider their verdict. At a quarter to six o'clock Lord Campbell informed the learned counsel that he had received a message from the jury, staring that they could net agree, and asked them if they would consent to the jury being discharged. 'rho learned Counsel said they could net assent to the proposition, but were willing to leave it to his lordship. Lord Campbell then sent for the jery, and on their arrival in court, asked them if they were likely to agree. He had given them six questions on matters of fact, which it was necessary they should find in the affirmative or negative. The Foreman said they were not likely to agree on the whole either way. Lord Campbell informed them they must agree, and must be locked up until they did so. The Foreman of the jury asked for tile indictment, which was handed to him, awl they again retired. About seven o'clock Lord Campbell again returned into court, and said he had received another message from the jury, to the effect that they could not agree. Tney were again sent for, and asked by .Lord Campbell if they thought there was any probability of coming to a decision. The Foreman said there was not. They were about equally divided oa the indictment, but could not agree on the questions. Lord Campbell said they must find a verdict on the questions of fact he had submitted to them, which con tained the assignments of perjery. If they found in the affirmative, that. would be a verdict of guilty ; but, if in the negative, it would be an acquittal. A Jeror said they were not likely to find a verdict in the affirmative.. They were, however, agreed on two of them, in the negative. (Applause.) Lord Campbell said he did not ask them for such an expression of opinion. Ultimately, finding there Teas no chance of their agreeing, Lord Campbell, on his own responsibility, discharged them, intimating that the case would have to be tried again by another jury. The jury were accordingly discharged, and thus ended thia.extraordinary trial, virtually i n a verdict for the defdlidant. Mr. James : Is it true that, on the 4th Jelv, you were in an indecent position with him on the sofa Witnese : That story is a perfect fabrication. Mr. James: Or on the sth? Were you in an indecent posture on the sofa ? Witness : I say I swear to that day. I went to the theatre twice with the defendant, who left me at the door. I went once to the opera with him and his sister, Mrs. Thackeray. They both saw me home and left. Oa the 4th, Mrs. Thackeray called with her little boy, about three years old. They came with Mr. Robinson about eleven o'clock. Mr. Medias came oat of his room and jiined them. I went with Mrs. Thackeray and the chi'd for a walk. The defendant left the house with us, and after accompanying us a short distance we separated. I went with Mrs. Thackeray and her little boy into the park, returning to Bryanstone square about one o'clock. I there found my cousin waitint for me. I generally took lunch about one o'clock. My cousin only took lunch with me that day. After the defendant left the house in the morning I saw nothing more of him that day. On that day Mrs. M•Donald and her daughter called on me about three o'clock- She is the wife of General M`Donald, and my mother's sister. Thy remained about haifau hour or three quarters of an hour. When my father and mother came I took the whole of the house. My cousin went out about three o'clock, and my aunt came in his absence. They just missed them. They left before his return. I generally dined about seven o'clock. My cousin, after Mrs. M‘Danald left, went out with me before dinner for a walk in the park. We re turned but a short time before dinner. I am quite positive tho defendant did not call after, that morning. The defendant called on the following morning, the stn, about eleven or half-p ast e l even o ' clock. My cousin was then at home, and reading in the room adjoining. Mrs. Thackeray and her son called again that day with Mr. Robinson. They remained about half an hour, and we all went out together. We walked in the Park, the defendant leaving us at the Marble Arch. A shower of rain came on, and we got very wet. I returned home by myself. Mrs. Thackeray and her son were staying at Mr , . Robinson's, in Cumberland-street, and they left me in Little Quebec-street. I gat home to luncheon a little after one. I found my cousin there. The defendant did not lunch with inn that day. My father and mother arrived about five o'clock. I have no recollection of the defendant caking afterwards, or seeing him a f ter the morning viit. lam positive he did not. The 'd e f en d ant has a sou s in the Treasury. He called with his father two or three times in Bryanstone-square. I was in the habit of going with my father and mother to church. He never on any occasion called and saw me on a Sunday after my parents had gone to church. a mere billet doux of my own, imagine theeiree produced upon a country parson. Could such a one ever hope to cope with a hydra-headed beast _ _ like that. However, on a near inspection I found that it was its own mortal enemy, and that it had killed itself. Let any one read Mr. Maonaug,ht's letter, December 8, to which I refer, and see whether I am not quite eorrect in saying that from the " Scene in Modern History to the conclusion of the teaching of Socrates, as it is represented to us in the dialogues of Plato : " every fact proves, as it was likely to prove, tha unim peachable truth of God's Holy Word, that " The world by wisdom knew not God;" and, conse quently, that Reason has in no instance whatovor CLXVER CAPTURE.—" Two glasses of your beat ale, land bold," exclaimed Mr. Choop to a burly red-headed man with a villanous countenance, who came forward scowling suspiciously. The landlord's back was hardly turned before a quick whisper was exchanged between Timothy and Mr. Choop. We ware lighting our cigars when the landlord returned with the ale. He showed us into a small room, and we left the countryman still smoking at the door. He seemed to be a thirsty soul, this countryman, for he called for glass ait;r glass rapidly, as if fully deter mined on getting drunk in the shortest possible time. He drank so much that the landlord's bfg jug was at last ex hausted, and he lighted a candle to ge down into the cellar to draw more ale. Hardly had the landlord reached the bottom of the cellar steps before the door was quietly locked behind him. Mr. Choop's apathy vanished in a moment. Hie eyes flashed, his teeth glistened, he looked dangerous. "Go you into the garden," he whispered to me, " and take your stand blow the v indoor on the left. If Jim Riley jump) out—though I don't think he'll have time—lay hold of him, and stick to him till 1 c -me. Now, Tim, quick and si!ent !" Mr. Choop and Timothy, ,each pulling out an ugly looking staff, crept upstairs as stealthily as two burglars, while I hastened into the garden. A. mingled noise of shouting and ca'hs, crowned by a woman's wild shriek, the crash of a falling table, and then the window was flung up, and Mr. Darke dashed madly through, followed closely by Choop. They came to the ground almost together, and rolled over in a fierce struggle. But Mr. Darke, twice as strong as his opponent, was uppermost, sitting astride of Mr. Choop— only for one moment, for the next my arms were round his neck. I gave him a sudden pull back, with all my strength. Choop, now on his feet, whipped out his hand cuffs, and had Mr. Darke safe and fast before that individ ual could recover his breath. At this moment Timothy appeared, escorting Mrs. Riley —as I suppose she ought to be called —and carrying with much care the small black portmanteau. Mr. Choop opened it, and I perceived it to be half fell of watches, rings, pins, and jewellery of various kinds. The woman's veil, now thrown back, showed me the midnight traveller, minus the moustache; a bold, forward-looking good featured woman, bearing her misfortune with a haughty indifference that excited Timothy's adrairalion. The landlord, kicking at hie cellar door and calling to be let out long before this, was released by Timothy ; and very blank he looked when ho beheld how his guests bad suddenly come to grief.—Dirkesee Household Words. ...- _ • estanashed its supposed right to be superior to every other rule." In confirmation of this conclu- sion, Imust refer to an authority which is great with Mr. M., though it is looked upon, I fear, by many as a sort of second Book of Mormon—l mean Mac- naught on Inspiration —p. 175 in which he shews the very imporant blemishes and the religious and philosophic system of Socrates. What Mr. M.'s clients will say to him for this " making a speech on the wrong side, I do not know, but for my part I thank him for his help, and congratulate him on having become, in this instance, a true philosopher in spite of himself. It is almost the first occasion on which I have been able to agree with him, so different are my opinions from his. I have sometimes wondered how Mr. M. would reconcile the infinite variety of men's opinions with the chimerical notion that " Reason is the Word of God within mau"—Mac Insp ,p. 2. " Qlot honzines tot sententice,"—" Many men many minds " This is in our ♦ery primers —this truth our libraries teach—this truth is proclaimed by our disputes on all questions—this truth every day, every hour confirms ; and yet, in spite of all this unquestionable testimony, the visionary spritu aligt maintains that the light of nature is "superior to all other rules of faith." But, why should I say more. No reasoning, no factg, no declarations of Scripture can remove cherished notion. It is rather a sort of mono mania, or a punishment inflicted on those who By Mr. James : Either before or after your marriage, is it true that the defendant ever took any improper familiarities or indecent liberties with you? Witness: N(ver. perversely turn away from the light of heaven, and refuse to listen to the oracles of God, where- Cross-examined by Mr.Serjeant Byles : The defendant's mother r: sides in town He has two sis' ers. -- No lady called upon me in the Edgeware-road. The defendant did net call upon them every day. One day he did not call, but I can't account for it, perhaps he can. I never remember his calling on me three times a day. I kept no notes of it. I have read the defendant's evidence in the Arches Court. I don't recollect his calling three times a fore God " has sent them stron3 delusions to believe a lie." I intended to go on ht Cher with my apology cr defence, but I must be allowed to write again to-morrow, as I de not like to defer it longer, and you will observe that I have shown no wish or intention to retract or modify my as sertions. I have endeavoured in all my letters :rot to cast THE NORTHERN TIMES.-=LIVERPOOL, LION DAY, DECEMBER QB, 1857. December 24, 1857. unfounded imputations, but to draw honest con clusions, and to follow strict truth wherever it leads and whomsoever it may offend. K G LAZ E BROOK. Lower Darwen, December 23, 1857. THE M A.O bTA UOH r CONTROVERSY. TO THE EDITOR OP TIIE NORTHERN TIMES. Sir,—Your paper of this day contains a column of vague observations and personal remarks sub scribed by Mr. W. Wynne. I believe I only express the opinion of many of your readers, when I stigmatize Mr. Wynne's intrusion on the discus sion as silly and invidious. It is a pity he is so little sensitive as not to take the hints of one or two correspondents, who but speak the sentiments of many others in desiring him to refrain. His attacks upon Mr. Macnaught to day are most unfounded and absurd ; and his logic is - as un meaning and pointless, as that in which Mr. Maencught's opponent sometimes indulges. Not but what 'so vague a style is a capital resource, when the logician has no powers of argument, because tho reasoning is unanswerable. If you demonstrate geologically and cosmographioslly the impossibility of the moon's comppsition being green cheese, in order to prove the death of Queen Anne, no one can specially reruto your arguments, so long as you keep them sufficiently abstruse and uninteili.ible. And of this kind are the reasonings of Mr. Wynne, to whom I beg to. refer to a noted prototype of his—the talented Captain Bunsby, in Donzb(y and Son, whose mode of illation was generally as follows :—" Whereby, why not ? If so, what odds? Can any man say otherwise ? No. Avast then !" I would also advise Mr. Wynne to a.bstain fnm personal attacks on a gentleman or gentlemen— singular or plural—of greater knowledge, greater standing, greater talent and better sense than himself. Let him remember, others can be personal; and others satirical, as well as he ; and the alliteration of "Mr. Macnaught's Master Mind" can be equalled in that of the " Wilful Witlessness of TV. Wynne' Let him likewise remember, that his aid is neither desired nor admired in the discussion, and that Kr. Glezebrook cannot be in great need of his assistance, that he should requil e Wynne to wia his cause. Or, if he is subject to typomania, and cannot keep out of print, why, then, let Mr. Wynno know how to winnow his thoughts before ho commits them to paper, so that, if the public be not impressed with their lucidity, they may, at least, be spared the shock of an exhibition of irrelevancy and childishness.—l are, sir, yours very truly, L. H. STANHOPE. TO THE EDITOR OF MR NORTHERI TIME!. Sir,—The subjects for discussion between Mr Maclanght and Mr. Glazebrook, were all gloss mentioned in Mr. Macnaughes first replies to Mr. Glazebrook's letters. Mr. Glaa.Arook nunaberod the paragraphs, with the view of answering them in order, and Mr. M2tenitught expressed his approval of their being so numbered. Therefore inspiration is not the sole question at issue. Mr. Macnsught wants to avoid questions of doctrine, as he knows he does not hold, the Catholic faith. Mr. M. says, in his short note to the NORTHERN TIMES of December 18, that he will not reply to Mr. G.'s letter before he sees what apology will be made. However, the dialogue sent by a clergyman of the Church of England, bears strong evidence of being written by him, and it will be judged of accordingly. Ho disguises himself, in order to cast unfounded imputations. Mr. Wynne's powerful and discriminating letters seems to annoy the heterodox party very much. He has endeavoured to draw Mr. M. out on the Atonement, but Mr. M. •' holds this only as an article of peace," that is, not at all; he is known to deny it. "Holding articles of peace" is another name for shamelsss hypocrisy.—l am. sir, your obedient servant. 7ERITAS. December 23, 1857. DIALOGUE 111., BETWEEN ROBERT AND THOMAS. 7 hemas : Well, Robert, my char fellow, I'm very happy to see you once more. Robert : Same to you, or " shalom lechz," as tba Hebrews would say; you see I have been getting up a little Hebrew, which I find quite necessary, in order to prose cute fully my theological studies. T.: I quite agree with you ; read as much as you can ; don't confine yourself to one side of a que.tion ; shut not up yourself in a theological prison-house; rise above the narrow systems of dogmatism, and breathe the air of freedom. R.: In talking'about freedom, don't you think we are sometimes apt, through selfishness or same kindred spirit, to make it a ore-s'ded freedom T. : Yes, I do; and therefore, I say, let this principle of freedom extend to others—to all ; and let others extend it to one another, we cannot be true Christians without it; for the very essence of Christianity is lo ve , c h ar i ty , an d freedom. I see you are glancing at my Greek Testament ; I was just reading it when you came in. Turn to the third chapter of Titus, second vers, and you will find the English version of the text I was reading. R.: Yes, here it is. " To speak evil of no man." T.: That will do ; sub was the order given by Paul to a bishop of his own appointing, that he should watch over the interests of the people, and see that they spoke evil of no man; so that Paul thought it the duty of a bishop to see that th 3 members of his 11'Nek " spoke evil of no man ; " but what I wish more particularly to notice, is the correspond ing text in the Greek Testim'nr, "medeits blasphemein," to blaspheme or tpeak evil of no one. Now, just turn to " Liddle and Scott.'' R.: Here's the word, blasphemed, to hurt a man's good name, to speak ill (o-) to the prejudice of one, to defame. Well, I never noticed th t before, I always attached a cliffl-en! meaning to the word ; in fact, I always translated it " blasnLeme." T.: You see hot.w that our word "bl tspheme " is purely Greek, and carinq bear any other meaning than that which belongs to it in the Greek ; in this passtge it is rightly translated in our own vernacular, and so again in 1 Cora iv. 13, " Being defamed," Ice., the same word again in the original, you perceive ; so also in Ephesians iv., 31, " Let all bitterne;s, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil speaking (blasphentia), be put away from you, with all malice." I could not forbear reading the whole passage, as I think the advice contained in it well worthy of adoption, and cannot be thought of too often ; it is negative certainly, but read the following, and then you will see hew Paul states it positively. R. " And 'l)2 ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, &c." I think, entre notes, we might recommend this pass age to Mr. G.'s consideration ; if be feel unable to act up to the positive instructions of Paul, he might surely try and begin with the negative, and then he would abatsin from making such a liberal and uncalled for use of his favourite word braspheinia." T.: You see this word which has been knocked about so much of late could stand it no longer, and so has turned out a regular Scpoy. Blasphemy really, and in the Greek Testament, means " defamation," or " speaking evil of," and who is the " blasphemer" let facts and conscience alone decide. But Mr. G. is not satisfied with trying to bl-cken the character of the living, but he also, as you see from this letter iu the NORTHERN Theme of the 18th, does his beg, or rather his worst, to calumniate the deed, when they differ from him. R.: That seems to me the more cruel and cowardly, inasmuch as they cannot now speak for themselves, and yet their works speak for them ; of course we are at liberty to (mote a man's works, and even show that his statements and acquirements are false, if need be ; but it is transgressing the bounds of liberty, honour, and Chris. din charity, to wander from the work to the writer, and take occasion thereby to speak evil of him. Speak well of a man if you can, but if you canu(.4 do that, say nothing, that's my maxim. T.: A very go>d maxim, indeed • but I cannot see whlt all this has to do with the subj e ct o f controversy; it taxes all my powers of perspicuity to see any hing at all rele vant in this letter or the last from Mr. G. It may be a source of amusement or a literary exercise for Mr. G. to bear testimony to Dr. Arnold. when he says, "as a learned man and ax acknowledged scholar, few would hesitate to yield to his opinion as to the correctness of a translation of the New Testament ;" and then, in the same letter, to be at the trouble of represetvirg the Doctor, in the words of another clergyman, as one whose" ignorance in theology is really great, which, with all his claims t study and know ledge, begat a rashness and presumption of judgnunt, full of conceit, and imagined superiority." He quotes Dr. Arnola, as an authority, on a theological guidon, viz, the Trinity ; as an authority, remember, to support himself, and then, after a quotation from Biekoistetb, says, " having canuot nen .how low Dr. Arnstid ranks as a theologian attribute any weight," &co.! But this is not all; d e l surpising part of the business is, that, in the he afterwards winds up his opinion of Dr. Arno' ing that he, the Doctor, was right after all! fcli IZ : think I can account f or that fickleness e 1 Mr. G.'s faculties of association are so stronc, thatoto separate the writer from the writing. If th e tbs displeases him, he qu arre ls w ith t h e writer; i f merit is fasourible, he caresses the au thor; ' n it case, I think, with him more depends on the pe r the argument ; so that , when reading the g 4, ; Mr. G.'s opinion of the charact e r of the Rer g w „ oo fluctuate exactly in the same ratio with his to o statements and arguments of that person. 133 4 ,0il infallibility, do pm thluk there is any 1/ ` desirableness for it? if ebe T :No, I don't. What could fallible man dn, for prodigy as infallibility? We are pat all : wherever, or in whatsoever, man has a e ,' e in scripture or elsewhere, the human fallible g sl distinctly traced ; our reasonin g f a culties ` 1 1 :01 given to us to bow d o wn t o an y su ch iLc/ I .,, c alii icfallibllity. and whatever Some may say in deP: a le l , our own reasoning faculties, they, at V , e c : 6 , 1 practically assert their sup er i or i t y. E v en last Etter prop - mud the necessity of a higher 0 1001 that of the written words, wh en he sa y s he S humble dependence on the teaching of the It . „, ° 'i ns 6 I ascertain the mind of the spirit,' &a." ',"' -- 6 make sad m'stakes by ac t in g as if the so"' s! te complete volume, forgetful that the differen t rot appeared step by step, and sprang out of r o g bi preceded the did' rent stages of the religion record; and just as that religion, in its progresse e improved and pert' ok of a higher and m or e sl character, so in consequence the recor ds of tils progression contain. accounts and statements ennobling and spiritual, though fallible nett e -. 1 are human, ard therefore fallible r e cords of t which God has mad e k nown hi s ways upo n earlfh'— .„ R : Thank yeti for your eopinion, which ' itself by its trail falness*. It's getting late. P r cell go, as we wish t o b e " g ent l e , show i ng 0 0- all mer," let us hope that Mr. G. will testify h i * friendship to M r . M., as we should towards u h ' i o would be charitable towards him, and I wish ' blessing ; and, as I may not see you ag, a ' s d Christmas day, I will wish you, my dear friers" A so la) with Mr. M. a ve r y kapey Christmas ; °- good night! at) T. ; I adinire your liberal sentinseets, and u7 t e jcin y o u i n th em . G oo d e i g h t! A merry Cart s a happy new year ! Dec. 22nd, 185'7. :" LIVERPOOL, HO !" TO THE EDITOR OF THE NORTHERN - jg le t Sir,—From the line a t th e h ea d o f di e l will be at once under s t oo d t h a t I am gol A n ' , a ill of the novel of whi c h some extrac ts RNA your paper a few days ago . T wo o hi6 e.ti t to deter me. One i s , w h e th er I s h a ll 0° ail hook in obtaining a greater pu blicity deserves; the othe r w h e th er i t i s not ~, o to / supererogation to attempt to d e fend p BO public from the debasing and dent oraiisiog h eo o of such a book " Liverpool, Ho ! " demned at our libraries and s cou t e d in 011 0 4 „" but it will sell; and th oug h t hi s l et ter w a trifling additional commission t o o t the auther, the work will, soore l. o „ meet its proper fate. Th ere ar e, ' Ol O l plenty who will read it, and uphold it fl it 0 1 of antagonism ; but for the good ef e ar el wretched clerks, the miserable quill-dil% Or„ of the number, must disclaim Mr. Polinojev, infamous libel upon the mercan'ile 0 3 1 ) 0 011 Liverpool. lam a clerk ; I have been A 1,, F clerk ; and I have received liberal Ps , %10 01 : written verses, too, and very bad ones", 10°,; 1 bad as Mr. Oawyu's I havehad ohimerl e ; o loi for the amelioration of the condition °fo i l clerks especially. I have fallen asleep °f o e on mail nights, when the small hours round, bringing slowly in th e i r t ra in the %lit, day. I have been a P au l T reason , a nd re i r t ico sat for his portrait, save that I am n ot pa r fa ii good looking. Therefore, it is with 9 ob scionsness that I know what I em doing i° declare " Liverpool. Ho !" not to be a sto r i e s volume, but a Lie I I need not t ro ublebo al analysis, to show the truth of my d ' e Your readers may judg e fir themselves bY e r e the book. I do not want to curtail tsi " Liverpool, Ho !" My cause is nobler. fof . in the strongest te rms , d ec l are , on belw i ,e commercial clerks of Everpool, my intelnd and disapprobation at the f a l se hood, 01 0 1 3 le the blackguardly imm ora lity given for t ne o, Oswyn's mock-philanthropy. Do 1.„., Ar 01v, strongly ? What says " Liverpool, l'f e 'llV e • men are liars ! All commercial men s', iit eo if not worse ! Brokers; are too foul to besl o ' fi ' by even the sorest word in the English l ie! Most women are liars! Marriage is a 0 1 private homes of our merchants are th e v le blasphemy, hypocrisy and fraud ! The is Hell, and the River Mersey is it 6 Proserpina reigns in the modern Tyre. as powerfully descriptive as Mr. 06141 0 8 , are many epithets whi c h I am , I sul4P( l 'iee , enough to think are best out o f print• may pick them out of " Liverpool 11 ," i ,iinf bushel. But where are the d ov es in too l s aviary ? The innocents massacred before 0 , tt , of Plutus ? Mr. Editor. lam one of t he t a l e e old gentleman, the cashier, who sits O no eV, one of them ; those three young fellows o ' ppr e : are more. " Our office" is full of the . o! jeio t ., Bah ! we spit upon and spurn our egc' t ,, / v cier, d s elected champion, Mr. Oswyn. g"teetl to the rights of labour and the rights wal e better than " Liverpool, Ho !" can teaell lu i o r t and we look upon Mr. Oswyn as a Plt i eteß,i seizing what appears to him to be the, A r ead ts o to his own aggrandi semen t. S can dal lo ge op and requires no grace or purity of Is ng e eills t o it off. This valiant upholder of igirt?l ig to jo can trip a little, too—that is, if it is po l g i r Colt The slight sidewind gently puffing 0, 1,11 .01 establishment. Of course Mr. Cornis"„l P°oll; the agency for the sale of ‘. Liverev oo g Liverpool. If there was nothing °viol', the book he would. Oh, the trice .oclo, unexceptionable. And down r i o 14r ,, 1 0 0 1 / and " Liverpool Ho ! " glares in all " t o ce ij i panes. And Mr. Cornish wishes h ere vDo 0 thrust upon him with a falsehood, was b e lc 004 sensible reader will wish the book l° otie` 3 on reads it —among the things unborn' repudiating Mr. Powys Oswyn, I renv"; respectfully. Cook_street, Liverpool, 24th Deco 1 851. ea. l's' THE BANK STATEMENT MAN' C " As we are all bound to pay our de bts •e7 ta ° 1 i m n o g n o e l y d , a i r f ti w l e are honest men," ac c°rdj 911t°1° she e w i s t the lßeactuoke i f n ul t fi b l e Times, h it would bnei.:l,drbo:.,i! of England itself steady', 9 , 1 !„,, c°,,„01 Bill ft t o o a ld t u th s e th ß a i t ll 1 0 ‘ r n i. o 8 t 4 h i ing ,, gold) h is money in England; the effectual Le r t us see how the Returns make g°°' tion : Notes issued December 19th .. ...... •' • : Deduct notes held by the Bank ....... • • ' Deposits of Government Revenue • • •• Private Depositors Seven-day 8i115... is Bank Liabilities which she onght to we e gold, according to Lord Overstoce.- • • " But the only gold the Bank has in hand i 5 Cala P 1 1" 0 , AT j u AND kii IN e i n u nCh pi 1.! an; cl, Atm 'the ex , 0 ale 213 , LO:i Itt si tt m Fo pmE, 67 , CHI MU rA IC RW D to -Li:tu g, ICI PIA NI iCeita ebrat ed j 6d. '4 ~,,i• .... OS' . Uol , kl da n Pri 01 , , , fro: i r3 A.LM OpER, ' O2 S . 14 ' mdse.! BOT have SEM 7. Also •4104Dwc 57 C ......____ 4 n I 441 ) PLEAS WI, 1-I. I 185 , DU I r j k 'x 1 880 1 1: 1' 4 416 CUst fir t 81 4 ea havin • U • well. I kb B d L 'Plied to 0 co C PITO ri t eing m til it:r in i aanl ,, 64 r weel obl o tVuur li, Ti t 13 Et E LC 11 ---- NEw AT 11, ~84 8, 4I tL op ° YBTEI '" Partlei C OQN,c 'OfAs P 1 I tILE ith even ► 5 B Li4 ° , l l 1 410 1./," ° ItSE , Op 3 , I)O T , LS ( I r POLLs 11 1 44, in gr , 104) k ItU M 4X -111S: r 4 41, 41' I O i l t r , 6 I to ot hERV dal BK~II OJi Uo t Z , and l'tkto u t TtrEt 10 1 , a EIS" of ev g OL E 0 SA liti',ls' T 0 II T 0 u 18, W I 1, R 1 1 1\1 Or E h and kid mu - A L 3 se( 0 T c it it't a 8 1; 1 , 0 11 8 FI be,eu 46! and ‘ 4 4 ot —°3 his 44 :tiT e e r t t, e'or4s.; natureColiVt i, A a L in U ih . n kß ags LE LAND.—On thisv a st J fl• Pt .. , ,,... L ...._ , 8 appear to be i nex ha ustible. Itii rli" IA t t •ho P d Zt ii T le.yuaißaoll a d iti : ifl is or s I t " N l N N L 4 l. ....tta y it't "r i l :, 9 ee ? xi c i d aOuOs mostt i a bCirbee.osu, bountiful. iiefautril ,4,3i1i, w ere 0, la g, vi sad poi .0 9 tit 1 4 , hi c upper valley 8 1 aid malachite is found there al l ot too l et tltltit-s4,lar or moue, o 0# h Or a quantities, wi h porphyry Thai asper et gl-_. oo ‘ , , ~... 1 , 4 and various esLate o , I,ofrAtfr tt _ni coloured marbles forests 0: 1 , e tt , 5 1 ,0 1 / 4 1 ;4 . 1 1.," ut, more than ten thousand square, verats, and ', Kir i b) 'eCtt y , covered with timber.—ilekinsons Orioital aga Siberia, 414 QV Balance. which the Bank cannot pay in go l d Jersey. 'ibis _ 0 00 i gRE ,I°l'ooo 5, 00 k 00600 A N X‘.3a006/00 (PAT Ci Ir'oo6oo S 00 0, / N 43 , p 4004 ITT 131 / 0 0r .€ l° o o° ' X :3 aa -' 41.