The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1844-02-13 00:00:00

TO CORRESPONDENTS. We are cornpollNi , o postpone until next week a report of the meting the Foreign Aid Society, and several other com munications. Ebe 'lLitrrpool TUESDAY MORAING, FEB. 13, ISI4. By a reference to our Irish news, it will be seen that the trial of O'Connell and his confederates is at length drawing to a close, if even it has not al ready done so at the time at which we write. On Saturday evening the jury returned a verdict of guilty upon the third, fourth, fifth, seventh, and eleventh counts, the purport of which will be found detailed in the report of the proceedings, which is admitted by the organs of the traversers themselves to be equal in its consequences, to a verdict of guilty upon the whole. The return, however, was decided by Justice Crampton to be informal, owing to the jury not having said guilty, or not guilty, upon the remaining counts ; and the jury were sent back to fill up this omission. Owing to the late hour (nearly midnight) at which they retired for this purpose, it was considered best to adjourn the court over Sunday; and, nine o'clock yesterday morn ing was finally fixed upon for receiving their com plete finding. There is no probability that anything can arise from this course being pursued, to alter the effect of the decision to which the jury have al- ready come. We hope to be able to give the complete verdict, with anything of importance which has transpired in Dublin up to a late hour yesterday, in an early Second Edition, which our subscribers will be fur nished with gratis, on application at our office. Government has at length made a move—we trust only the first of a series—to wrest the suffering working classes of England from the domination of tyrant capital. On Tuesday last Sir James Graham moved for leave bring in a bill "to amend the act for regulating the employment of children in factories," the chief provisions of which we shall briefly place before our readers, preliminary to a few observations which we feel bound to offer upon them. It is proposed, in the outset, that the term " child" should be defined to apply to children between the ages of 9 and 13, instead of 8 and 13, the age pro vided for under the existing act; and that no such child should be employed for a longer time than six hours and a-half each day—such six and a-half hours to be either in the morning or the afternoon. The term " young persons" is to apply, as under the existing act, to persons between the ages of 13 and 18 years ; and, so far as relates to this class of workpeople, no material alteration is proposed, be yond the extension of the present restrictive clauses to silk mills, which have hitherto not been under regulation as to the hours of labour. The time at which it is proposed that such " young persons " should work, is from half-past five o'clock in the morning to seven o'clock in the evening, during the summer months, and from half-past six o'elock, a. m., until eight o'clock, p. m., in the winter; thus making thirteen hours and a half per day, of which one hour and a half would be allowed for "meals and rest !" Under the present law, all persons above the age el eighteen, without distinction of sex, have been treated as adults, and no limitation of the hours of labour imposed. Acting, however, upon the repre sentations of the Factory Inspectors, with respect to the injurious results of the long hours of labour imposed upon females, Sir James Graham has decided that no female should, under any circum- stances, be required to work for more than twelve hours out of the twenty-four—the inspectors them selves recommend ten hours as the extreme ; thus placing them under the clause which applies to the la bour of "young persons," viz :—imposing upon them attendance for thirteen hours and a half per day, with an hour and a half for "meals and rest." Regula tions are also proposed for restricting the existing power of making up for short time, for providing against accidents from machinery, and for other remedial purposes. The educational clauses, which last year excited so violent an uproar in the camp of dissent ; are omitted in the present bill, the Govern ment contenting itself with providing that a cer tificate from some school should be a necessary condition to a child receiving employment, and insisting that sufficient time be allowed for school attendance. Of course the voluntary efforts now making to provide efficient schools, have had some share in inducing this determination. _ _ . We cannot say that we are at all satisfied with this measure, although we acknowledge the value of many of its provisions. So far as the clause limiting the hours of labour of children, from nine to thirteen years of age, is concerned, it has our unqualified approbation. No child of such tender years ought to be immured in the factory for more than half the working day, thus depriving it of the recreation necessary to its growth and health, and of the opportunity of mental cultivation. But we should have been glad to see some provision made, with respect to the kind of schools empowered to grant certificates. If we do not insist upon the education provided being education in the tenets of, and regu lated by, the Church of England, still we are bound to take care that it is sound and wholesome educa tion, conducted by competent persons, and not the mockery of education which has been afforded un der the existing measure. With respect to the clauses affecting "young persons " between the ages of thirteen and eighteen vears, we have strong objections to them. For a boy of such tender years—for a girl just verging upon womanhood—who can deny that thirteen Lours and a half's attendance upon the drudgery of the factory, with but an hour and a half per day for " meals and rest" (!)—for meals which, in five cases out of nine, must be taken with the factory door for a table, and "rest" which cannot be taken at all—is a slavery alike destructive to health and to morality ? Such a proposition is disgraceful to Sir James Graham, and savours far too much of the heartless utilitarianism of " liberal" philosophy to be acceptable to the English people. It will be scouted, we do not hesitate to say, by nine-tenths of the manufacturing population, who, for this class of workers at least, must have and will have a TEN Horns BILL. There is one consideration connected with these 3nd the preceding clauses, which strikes us as a formidable obstacle to their working advantageously together. You restrict the labour of children, under thirteen, to six hours and a half per day, and thus render necessary a double set: of such hands for each factory. You have thus a growing population training up to factory labour, one half of whom may possibly be surplus hands on reaching the age when they may be allowed to be plu n g e d into the full drudgery of factory life. What, we ask, is to be done with this surplus ? The difficulty of the ques• tion is great, and we do not pretend to be able to solve it satisfactorily. It must be met, however; and we cannot see how, except by further restric tions on the hours of labour of the class styled "young persons," and limitation especially of the of female lobo-an We have long deplored—every humane man hat; long deplored—the substitution, whil has been going on extensively for years pst, of female for tnale labour in factories. Sir James Graham proposes—beneficently (.9 proposes—that no female shall, under any circumstances, be permitted to work for more than twelve hours continuously. The young mother of an infant in the cradle, whose unemployed husband is tending it at home, if he is not at the beer-house or the dram-shop, shall not he permitted to withdraw the maternal breast and the maternal care, for more than twelve hours in the day. Exceeding humanity of a Conservative government! The mother, whose child is, or should be, attending the factory school, must remain at her toil until seven o'clock in summer and eight o'clock in winter, and leave that child to the guiding of his own inclinations, or of the vicious companions whom he may meet in the streets. Rare philan throphy of a Christian legislature ! We trust that English fathers and English mothers will not per mit, in this age, the recognition by parliament of such an atrocity. The women of the manufacturing districts must be dragged from this slavery. It is revolting and barbarous. If we must have women toiling in our factories, give them, at least, some remission of that toil which the constitution of man is alone fitted to endure. Give, to the daughters of England and the mothers of England, protection from the avarice which would doom them to the body's and the soul's ruin, to save a farthing in the cost of a bun dle of yarn or a piece of calico. Give them the protection of that restriction of their hours of labour which will alone tempt the greedy mill-owner to take the husband and the father from their present state of compulsory idleness, and restore the daughter, the wife, and the mother to their houses and their domestic purity and usefulness. England requires this from Sir Robert Peel's Go vernment; and to her repeatedly urged demands the measure before us is an INSULT. Now, indeed, is wanted amongst us the presence of the factory people's friend—the lately-prisoned Oastler ! Thank Heaven, his dungeon is unbarred His voice, impressing upon the hearts of the British people, already opened to the cause of their suffer ing working classes, the iniquities of the system of our manufacturing districts, will seal the fate of these iniquitous .and mocking provisions of Sir James Graham's measure. The comments, in our last, upon Mr. Alderman Evans' apppeal to the publ.c in opposition to the proposed plans of dock extension, appear to have flurried that gentleman, if we may judge from the tone of the reply, with which he has favoured us in the Mercury of Friday last. We shall not imitate him. Passion should never enter into the discussion of such questions as the one which we have now in hand ; and whilst we propose hei eto examine the facts and figures put forward by Mr. Evans, we shall deal with his ill temper in another place. In fairness to the Alderman, and to enable our readers the better to understand the question at issue, we give his letter entire. DOCK EXTENSION. To the MERCHANTS and TRADERS of LIVERPOOL. It is neither my taste nor my necessity, in defence of my statements as to dock accounts, to bandy scurrilities with " editors" who assume, in the way of trade, the re sponsibility of articles which, from the knowledge they evince of details, are, if not penned, probably prompted by some member of the Dock Committee, an advocate of those measures which I oppose. The scurrilous epithets applied to my letter in the Albion by a mercenary scribe, or his recondite prompter, being the expected consequence of my advocacy of the public interests, can give me no concern. The state ments which I have given of dock finances are, with one exception, (a correction I felt justified in making,) based upon the printed and written documents furnished to me from the Dock-office. The correction consisted of sums to the amount of about £14,000, which, after close inves tigation, appeared to me, and to another gentleman of the committee particularly skilled in dock accounts, to have been incorrectly placed to the debit of " New Works," instead of being, as this should have been, placed to the account of " Repai:s, &c." For this trans fer I consider I have the virtual authority of the surveyor, in his declaration to me that the lowest allowance that shot be made for " Repairs and Casualties" was 4:35,000 per annum. This so far exceeds the sum £25,828, stated in the dock accounts, under the head of " Repairs." as to show the latter to be a manifest error. A wore extended classification, and a wore accurate distribution of disbursements under the respective heads, is wanted for the purpose of ascertaining the real surplus or deficit of dock revenue. If a sum is pieced errone ously to the account of " New Works," it does not enter into the statement of annual expenditure, and so far im pairs the correctness of the statements, making the ba lance, or, in this instance, the surplus income, appear to be larger than it truly is. I will not again go into the details of my former state ments. They were drawn out with the intention of being correct, and I believe they will be found, in any case, a sufficient approximation to facts to support the general tenor of all that I have urged in respect to the impro priety and danger of accomplishing the projected new works. _ _ We are told that only a portion of these new works is to he constructed " at once," " some of them not at all." I know of co authority for this dictum, or this mode of carrying out or partially evading the act which goes to the full extent of the surveyor's project, and which ac;, once got, may, and probably will, be forced by interested parties into full operation. The promise of not laying out the whole sum to be raised is truly seductive, but it unfortunately happens that the quantity of laud to be purchased north and south will, in litnine, dispose of a large portion of the contemplated, to be borrowed, capital. The agreement with the Leeds canal will doubtless make some small abatement of the estimates, but the spare unmade land at the extreme north, which bad escaped my memory, may well be set off against remote future con tingencies. I freely admit that the Albert Dock warehouses, when permitted to be built, will produce a far greater return than interest of money expended in their construction, but for the Albert or other new docks no claim for addi.• tional revenue can be allowed, unless the trade of the port increases to the extent of thQ work they do, otherwise new docks will only take business from the older ones. In this case, the expense of new as well as old docks will fall upon an income which can be kept up only by very much increased dock rates. But whether trade increases or not, I am well assured that unless warehouses be constructed to a considerable extent round the docks on this side, not only new but old trade will find other domiciles than the open docks of Liverpool. EYRE EVANS. In its main points, then, the Alderman adheres to his statement of last week, in which he sheaved a deficit of £70,000, per annum, as the result of the execution of the plans at present before the Dock Committee, provided that the revenue of the Dock Estate remains at its present amount. We must see, therefore, by what kind of logic and arithmetic he has arrived at that statement. Here are his original figures : ".The interest on £1,798,000, the present debt, as it stands Interest upon £175,000, to be still raised for Albert Dock Interest upon cost of land and proposed new docks, £1,300,000.. Lighthouse, telegraph, lifeboats, &c. Management, police, dock-gatemen, &c., for the old docks and Albert Dock . Lamps and miscellaneous expenses for existing Docks and Albert Dock 12,893 Annual repairs and casualties on existing docks and Albert Dock Proportion of repairs, casualties, and other ex penses which accompany dock extension, on Proposed new docks. .......... £288,093 Deduct interest on Albert Dock ware houses ............................ £12,000 Balance of rents to be acquired from yards, &c., north and south, less £7,000 to he lost on Messrs. E. Chat loner and Duncan's yards -------- 14,000 £274,093 " If to this," he continues, " we add any expense which may, however absurdly, be imposed for disposing of the mud taken from the docks, we may, possibly, have an annual outlay of so mew h ere a b ou t £290,000 ; from which deduct the present revenue of £216,000, and a deficit ap pears of above £70,000 per annum, which, unless trade increases, must be provid e d f or b y i ncrease d dock-rates. For the present we pass by the qtrestion whether THE LIVERPOOL STANDARD. a man, anxious only after the truth, had a right to d:ag - into an account of the resources of the Dock Estate the whole of the first three items, amounting to £144,719, when no less than £88,899 of that sum is interest upon the supposed cost of new works, for which he does not give the estate credit for a shilling of revenue. Deduct the whole of these items, however, from his amount of £288,093; and we have the cost of working the docks put down at £143,374 per annum. Now what was the cost of working our existing docks last year ? It was £81,520; and the assump tion, therefore, is, that to work the proposed nthv docks will cost an additional sum of no less than £61,854 ! Of itself this is astounding enough; but let us look at the details. In the first place we have put down under the head of " Lighthouse, telegraph, lifeboats, &c., the sum of £15,000." The sum which covered these items last year was £14,700, of which £5,500 was paid for the new iron light-ship. The present average expense under this head may, there fore, fairly be calculated at £lO,OOO. Again we have " Management, police, &c." for existing docks, and Albert Dock, put down at £31,685. Last year it was £29,057. The Albert Dock, therefore, is to cost us £2,600 additional under this head; and yet such additional cost of the Alderman's pet scheme is held out as an argument against the construction of the proposed new docks. Further, we have the " Annual repairs and casualties," on existing docks and Albert Dock, put down at £44,796. Last year it was only L 25,828 ; and we are to conclude, there fore, that the Albert Dock is to involve us in an in creased expenditure of £19,000 for repairs ! But the estimate for repairs this year is, the Alderman tells us now, " a manifest error." It may be. We should imagine, however, that it is not very likely to be so, notwithstanding the discovered £14,006 by himself and the gentleman "particularly skilled in dock accounts." Parties—and especially engineers and surveyors—engaged in the construction of new works are not ordinarily in the habit of in creasing their apparent cost, at the risk of running beyond their estimates, by debiting them with the repairs of old works. An error on the other side would be a credible occurrence. But the most outrageous supposition in this state ment is that the repairs, &c., of the new docks pro posed will amount to an annual sum of £39,000. Yes, £39,000 for the repairs of new docks, contain ing a water space of less than 50 acres, if the whole of the plans were carried out; whilst the old docks, with a water space of more than 90 acres, are re paired for £26,000. Really, Mr. Evans, you will find few sane people who will gulp down so mani fest an absurdity ! But now, let us ask Mr. Evans how it is that, in this statement, he has no difficulty in giving us the amount of increased expenses incurred by the for mation of the Albert Dock and warehouses, and yet only credits that portion of the estate with a return of 12,000. For his contemplation and that of the public, we will present him with his own account of this, his pet speculation.. We have, then, first— Interest on present new applied to 11,p.rt Dock and works, £421,940, per annum Interest on money to be borrowed, per annum 18,904 Additional police, &c., for Albert Dock, per annum Increase in annual repairs, taking as our basis the Alderman's own calculation of £35,000 as the amount now expended 9,796 £49,295 This large sum, then, of £49,295 is to be the annual cost of the Albert Dock and works, toward which we are only to look for a revenue from them of £12,000! Yes : this very fair and very honest statement, which the Alderman boasts that he can substantiate, represents the dock estate as a loser, by his own favourite scheme, to the extent of MORE THAN THIRTY-SEVEN THOUSAND POUNDS PER ANNUM ! Surely, the most bitter opponent of this scheme could never have put forth a statement so damning. We ourselves have certainly no fear that a result so disastrous will attend the working of this dock and its warehouses. We have some little confidence in the Alderman's sagacity; and, when we remem ber that the estimated revenue to be derived from this dock was laid before the committee on the bill at £12,000 or £14,000 a year, and the revenue of the warehouses at more than £40,000 per annum, we cannot imagine it possible that such splendid prospects can have altogether evaporated, without Mr. Evans taking some steps to arrest the progress of works so ruinous. Mr. Evans says now that, " for the Albert or other new docks, no claim for additional revenue can be allowed, unless the trade of the port in creases to the extent of the work they do." Why, of course. Any blue-coat boy could have told us that. But the trade of the port will increase; has gone on increasing for years past, and is increasing still. It increased, for tonnage, goods, and lights, by an amount of 4. 21,751 Bs. 7d., or £ll 17s. 61 per cent. in one year. And yet it is doubtful— is it ?—whether the Albert Dock, with its addition, two years hence, of ten per cent. to our dock space, can find any business except what it draws from that of our existing docks. Another increase of ten per cent. in our trade will absorb the additional space afforded us by the Albert Dock, and leave our other docks in their present crowded state; and that increase, we venture to say, will occur long before the completion of the Albert Dock ! But turn we now to the question, as it affects the dock bond-holders, amongst whom Mr. Alderman Evans is endeavouring to get up a panic. Let us see what is the state of their property. The earnings of the working docks last year, as given by the Alder man himself, was The expenditure of the working docks (exclusive of new works and in terest on new debt) was, last year, 138,725 18 3 The excess, therefore, of revenue over expenditure was This is, therefore, the surplus which Mr. Evans says we shall not only get rid of by the formation of our proposed new docks, but create in its place a defi ciency of £70,000 per annum. Now, bearing in mind the fact that the Canal Company have agreed to execute a portion of the new works; that the proposed mole at the entrance of the north docks will not be wanted ; that the gravi ng . docks on the parliamentary plan will only be wanted in part ; we are certainly warranted in taking the whole expense of the new works at £1,120,000, not £1,300,000 as estimated by Alder man Evans. The interest, therefore, which will fall upon the dock e s t a t e we put d own a t £44,800 To this add th e i nterest upon half the new debt, say £480,000, at four per cent. . . . 19,200 And we Lave as the new fixed charge upon the estate to be deducted from the present surplus revenue of £77,000. But £5,000 will Le derived from the rents of land on the Harrington estate, which, added to the daeren ye between £77,000 and.f.:64,000, will give us a clear surplus still of £i 8,000 ; a sum more than adequate to meet the increased expense of management, which Mr. Evans so exaggerates, whilst the dock trustees will have at the north, when the works there are finished, from 300,000 to 400,000 square yards of valuable land to dispose of. Grant, then, that for the six, or more, years which must elapse before our new docks are finished, the trade of Liverpool should stand still—a most improbable supposition—and we have still a sufficient income to meet all the demands upon us, without the bugbear of increased dock rates, with which Alderman Evans would fright the bond-holders of our dock estate, and arrest the progress of improvement. INCREASE OF THE COTTON TRADE OF GREAT BRITAIN. Mr. Charles Hindley, M.P. for Ashton-under-Lyne, although a member of the league, has ever been acknow ledged as a sincere friend of the working classes; and we have, therefore, pleasure in calling attention to some statements made by him during the debate on the motion for the introduction of a new factory bill. We are con tinually being told by the whig•radical party that any legislative interference between the labourer and his em ployer would be injurious to commerce. Mr. Hindley, however, has reminded us that whereas, in 1833, previous to the factory bill of Lord Althorp (which, to some ex tent, protected the labourer), the annual exportation of cotton was only 66,000,000 lbs. ; it is at present 158,000,000 lbs.,—being a difference of 130 per cent. in favour of a lenient system of treatment for the working classes! In 1833, the annual consumption of cotton in this country was 169,000,000 lbs., or greater by 66 per cent.! We recommend these facts to the league and their bantling, the Anti-monopoly Association of Liverpool. Again, we are told by these bodies that there has been, up to this time, no material alleviation of the condition of our manufacturing interest. What says Mr. Hindley, however ? Why—that " NEW MALLS WERE ON THE POINT OF BEING BUILT IN LANCASHIRE !" And yet, in the face of this fact, with a deficient cotton crop, and an assurance of an increase of trade sufficient to justify the erection of more factories, we were told the other day, by a fustian manufacturer,—a director of the Bank of Manchester,—that the brokers of Liverpool, in advancing the price of the raw material (cotton), were " picking the pockets of the manufacturers ! " Study the gentleman who uttered this piece of insolence can never have read the letters of the Rev. Sydney Smith; for, certainly, if an American—a member of the repudiating state—ought, before entering honest society in Great Britain, to offer his purse to one creditor of the model republic, his coat to another, and his hat to a third, a director of the Bank of Manchester ought to make some restitution to the shareholders of that mis managed concern, before he ventures to twit others with dishonesty ! We could say more on this subject; but our Man chester liberals, without having the decency of forbearing to slander their neighbours, have become too fond of directing the penalties of the law of libel against those who offend their high-mightinesse , , to render it safe on the part of a journalist to whisper an unwelcome truth in their ears. REVIEW OF THE COTTON MARKET. On Tuesday, the 6th instant, at the close of 'Change, the sales were reported at 13,000 bales, which restored to the market the tone and firm feeling it had lost on the pri , •••'--ls day. On Wednesday all was excitement, the ? -uet was off, and the delivery of her papers shelved a ti emendous falling off in the receipts at the shipping ports ; nevertheless, speculation in America had almost sub sided, and although the sales reached from 10,000 to 12,000 bales, yet Tuesday's extreme rates were barely supported. Thursday, the enquiry was not to any great extent, and the sales were only 3000 bales, without any change in price. On Friday, there was a good at tendance of the trade, who purchased about 5000 bales; late in the day, speculators also operated to the extent of 4000 or 5000 bales. On Saturday, the market ap peared quiet ; the fact of a short crop seemed to gain credence, and fully 12,000 were sold, half of them to speculators, 4000 of these were Surats, sold by one house; this extent of demand cleaned the market pretty well of all saleable cotton ;—prices were imperceptibly tighten ing. On Monday (yesterday), there appeared no lack of enquirers, and 7000 bales were sold, 2000 of them only to speculators—viz., 1300 Surats, and 700 Brazil. With all this business doing we may remark that holders do not shew their Cotton freely, and will only sell at very extreme prices. The steamer of the Ist is hourly expected. • RUMOURED PROJECT OF A LINE OF PACKETS BETWEEN NEW YORK. AND HULL. The Albion of yesterday calls the attention of the Dock Committee to a rumour, put forth by the Hull Packet, and noticed in our last, that " there is a company pro jected for establishing a regular line of packets between New York and Hull." The grounds upon which these projectors base their hopes of the success of their scheme, are the low rate of port charges in Hull compared with Liverpool, and the less expensive inland carriage. (!) From this rumour, our contemporary says, the Dock Committee ought to derive a valuable lesson, and to "eschew taking any steps which may tend to increase the dues already complained of as too heavy." In reply to this piece of fudge, we shall only assure our contemporary that the Dock Committee are taking no steps likely to increase th., dues of the port of Liver pool ; and that the projected company is only a bubble, of which, at about three guesses, we could name the authors. The Leeds Railway Company, and the Hull and Selby Canal Company, would, no doubt, like vastly to see the cotton of America, all, or the great bulk, of which is consumed on this side of the range of hills bordering Lancashire and Yorkshire, and borne along their various lines; but the people of Lancashire are not likely to adopt so very pretty and very costly a whim as this importation at Hull, with its increased freights, and with above a hundred miles carriage, would prove to them. The Albion had better look out for some other anti dock extension bugbear. This won't do ! OASTLER is FREE.--The good deed is done ! The earnest desire of the people is gratified. The prison door has been opened, and the poor miin's friend is liberated. Mr. Oastivr was yesterday released from his confinement ; and, we perceive that a placard has been issued, one of which was left at our office last night, calling upon his friends to form in procession on Shrove Tuesday. and conduct their champion from Brighouse station to Hud. dersfield. No doubt the people will assemble in thou sands on such an exciting occasion. LECTURES ON THE EVILS OF THE FACTORY SYS TEM.—We understand that the large body of the Com mercial Hall will he thrown open this evening to the pub lic of Liverpool, to hear the second lecture of the series now in course of being delivered there by Mr. Mackin tosh, from the Episcopal Church of Scotland, when, we have no doubt, the evils of the factory system will be ably pointed out. _ _ THE FUNDS! SATURDAY .NIGHT.—The public securi ties have maintained tolerable firmness, and although bu siness has been limited, there appear to be no symptoms of an unfavourable change. Bank Stock left off 192 to 194 ; Consols for money and the account, 971 to a ; Ex chequer-bills, 675. to 695. premium ; India Stock, 277 to 279 ; Three-and-a-Half per Cents. . Reduced, 103 to k; New Three-and-a-Half per Cents., 102 to ' s -; Long An nuities, ; and ditto 30 years, 12 11-16. The fluctua tions in the foreign stocks were trifling. Spanish con tinues flat at 23 to a for the Actives, and 32,1- to for the Three per Cents. Mexican closed at 31 to a for the Five per Cents., and ]O to 111 for the Deferred ; Dutch Two and-a-Half per Cents. were 551 to 1 ; Danish, 861 to 871; Colombian, 121 to -a; Chilian, 103 to 105; Brazilian, 781 to 791 ; Belgian, 1051 to 1061 ; and Peruvian, 27 to 1. GENERAL Tom Tuumn, JUNIOR.—Our readers have no doubt heard of an ingenious gentleman in London who advertized his intention on a certain evening, to get into a pint bottle upon the stage, sing a song out of the bottle neck, and perform sundry other surprising feats. The small gentleman, whose name heads this notice, and whose qualifications will be found recorded in our advertiz ing columns, cannot—as when put to the proof his London prototype could not—get into quite so small a vessel as a pint bottle ; but we can assure our readers that a visit to him will not excite them to tear up the benches of the Portico in their rage of disappoi n t men t, as was th e ca se of his fabulous rival. He is, in very deed, a prodigy ; and should be seen by all who delight in prodigies, as well as by those who wish to look upon one of nature's strange freaks. DEATH FROM POlSON.—Yesterday an inquest was held before P. F. Curry, Esq., the borough coroner, on view of the body of Mr. Thomas Hannah, of Lionel-street. The wife of the deceased said that he was a druggist. About half-past two o'clock on Thursday night he came home in a very dull way, and appeared stupefied, as if he had been asleep somewhere. He complained of being cold ; sat by the fire a few minutes, and was then got to bed. He did not sleep, but was restless during the night, and did not speak. He continued in the same state till about two o'clock on Friday, when he asked for a sweating pow der, which was given to him. He was very cold all the time. About four in the afternoon he fell asleep and never roused again, but continued in that state until about eight in the evening, when he died. He had been in deli cate health ; appeared to be in a decline, and was in the habit of taking different articles of medicine when he felt unwell. The witness did not know of what the sweat ing powder was composed.—Mr. Arnold, surgeon, said he was called to the deceased before his death, and found him Insensible, and evidently labouring under the effects of narcotic poison. He administered such stimulants as he thought proper, but he never rallied. On a post mortem examination he found the cause of death to have pro ceeded from taking opium —Verdict accordingly, but by whom administered no evidence. MR. ALDERMAN EVANS. Mr. ALlerman Evans is, it is well known, in profession, liberal" of the first water. He has ever been known as a thoroughgoing advocate of the rights of free discus sion—as an advocate of " the liberty of the press." Nay, so far as this powerful engine is concerned, he has even been known to dabble anonymously in authorship —to creep behind the screen of the editorial chair, and thence to fling his venom in the faces of his political opponents. But, alas! the world has all along been mistaken in the character of this most " liberal" man. The worthy al derman—the friend of free discussion —shrinks before the first application of the knout to his acknowledged literary offspring; and takes refuge in his abstruse knowledge of a vocabulary which we cannot consent to imitate. This amiable gentleman, defeated alike in the Dock Committee and the Council, appealed last week, through the columns of the Albion, to a higher tribunal than either of these bodies—viz., public opinion. Upon that letter we remarked—certainly in as respectful a tone as it deserved—in our last publication. For so doing, we are termed by him, in a letter since addressed to the Mercury, (upon which we have commented at length elsewhere,) a " mercenary scribe"—one with whom Mr. Evans would. •not willingly descend to " bandy scurrilities." We cer tainly do not complain of this. On the contrary we are pleased to see our opponent exhibit himself in his true coloUrs—put off the assumed garb of a gentleman. But may we ask him—if he can keep his temper whilst we ask him—in what respect are we " mercenary scribes ?" Such a character, we have always thought, belonged to those who, for yain, advocated any particular views, opposed to their judgments and their principles. Does Mr. Alder man Evans mean to say that we have ever been guilty of this baseness? We will not "descend" to use in reply the favourite language of the alderman. We will not "fling back the insinuation in his teeth with indigna tion," &c., for in truth we cannot feel indignation —we cannot feel even contempt —we can feel only pity for the utterer of a charge so silly and ridiculous. Perhaps, however, we may he wrong in this. Perhaps, Mr. Evans, in the course of his experience as a public man, has discovered such an animal as a " Mercenary Scribe ?" We trust however he has not been so fortunate as to do so in Liverpool. In one sense, no doubt, he may have found such. Editors are, we suppose, in general, paid for their labours : but surely Mr. Alderman Evans —this advocate for free discussion, and friend of the liberty of the press—does not impute such payment as disgraceful to the receiver. He would not have men who toil in the endeavour to direct public opinion, to the best of their poor judgement, aright, eating the bread of charity and deprived of that feeling of personal indepen dence which that man must have who lives either by the sweat of his brow or the honest exercise of his intel lect. We would remind Mr. Alderman Evans that, by this sneer against us—which is a sneer as well against every writer for the public press—he is guilty of ingratitude the most monstrous and inexcuseable. If there is any public man, within the circle of our acquaintance, more indebted than another to the patient indulgence of the press, it is this very man, who is now angry because he is kicked from the pinnacle to which they have aided in raising him. REPEAL AGITATION AND ANTI-CORN-LAW AGITATION, ONE ! Conservatives have, as a body, been too much accus tomed to regard the league as a body agitating a mere fiscal question. We have never viewed it as such. We have looked at the constitution of that body. We have seen amongst its ranks the most violent and bitter ene mies of the church and the institutions of our land. We have detected in its proceedings a recklessness as to con sequences, which has convinced us that it is prepared, at any moment, to associate itself with instruments the most vile, and to embark in projects fraught with the destruc tion of the greatness, the peace, and the liberties of Eng land. As a proof of the correctness of these views, we now appeal to a witness whose evidence will be regarded as tolerably conclusive upon the question. We appeal to DANIEL O'CONNELL, who at a meeting of the Repeal Association last week, thus boldly unmasked his own views and the views of the Anti-Corn-Law-League ! " I rise," exclaimed the arch traitor, "for the purpose of cheering you on with the assurance of success by abstaining from violence or outrage. lam sure that what I say will be heard and observed from the Giant's Cause way to Cape Clear, from Connemara to the Hill of Howth. The ministry have set their face directly against tbeAnti. Corn-Law League, and the Anti-Corn-Law League will necessarily be driven to rouse the people of England—to bring them to consider the constitution of the House of Commons and the organic changes necessary. A reform in parliament will necessarily follow the efforts of the Anti-Corn-Law League to procure the enlargement of the franchise, and not leaving the aristocracy of Eng land the sole dominion over the constitution of that houae, and when they combine with Jo,eph Sturue and his com plete suffrage movement thei; will have ensured a triumph. SUCH A PARLIAMENT AS TS AT WOULD AT ONCE TAKE THE REPEAL QUESTION INTO IHEIR CONSIDERATION." An An•i-Corn Law Parliament will at once take the Repeal question into mnsideration ! Hear you that, Conservatives of Liverpool? The object, for which this conspirator against the integrity of the empire spouted upon Anti-Corn Law platforms, in Manchester and else where, is now palpable—is now acknowledged. The Anti- Corn Law League and the Repeal Association are one. A second Lichfield House Conspiracy made them one. The objects are common objects—the abasement of all that is great and noble in the land before a rampant mill ocracy, and the prostration of your Protestant Church Eintl your protestant liberties beneath the feet of a mix ture of intolerant dissent, of furious infidelity, and of popery ! Surely you will be warned, at length, and awake from the lethargy with which you have hitherto regarded this instrument in the hands of Daniel O'Connell—the Anti-Corn Law League ! RODNEY•STItEET CHURCH.—On Tuesday, the: 20th instant, at noon, it is the intention of the committee and members of the congregation to proceed to the election of a minister. We understand the choice lays between Dr. Freeland, Mr. Brown and Mr. Frazer. THE DOCK TRUST.—We understand it is the intention of the shipowners to memorialize the Board of Trade with the view to alter the present constitution of the Dock Trust, praying that the Dock Committee should be in creased to twenty-four members, the rate-payers to elect twelve, instead of eight representatives, as at present, for the purpose of deliberating on the wants and considering the interests of their constituents, redressing their grieve ances, and attending to their legitimate desires, as well as to counteract the present preponderating political power of the corporation in the committee ; and to lay the foun dation for more salutary chanzes in the administration of the dock estate, with the view to afford due protection to both the bond-holders and rate-payers. Council COLLECTIONS.—A member of St. Andrew's congregation has favoured us with the following statement of the collections at that church during the past year, amounting in the whole to £514, namely : Feb. 12, Church Building Society.. Mar. 25, St. Andrew's Schools May 21, Church Missionary Society July 9, Church of England Schools Aug. 27, Church Pastoral Aid Society Oct. 8, Diocesan Church Building Society ...... „ 15, Jews Society Nov. 5, Scripture Reader .. 5_ Dec. 31, St. Andrew's Infant School 39 schoolspreach two con n e sermons ct edt h o n t h Sundaye church, o e next, We are informed that the Lord Bishop of the diocese will Mayor has signified his intention of being Suor LIFTING.--Yesterday, at the Police Haynes, were charged with being concer ioe d hboe i o of f n r o . s k s s o.n. Reynolds,,e It td appeared r boy oo er o a f the td a that provision a ir eof Robert de a Reynoldse r , o u jp rlington-stree , family present.c ne court, ralsoccasion entering nfmantt hh ee During their absence, and about seven in the had left the house on Sunday to aticnd n atwlh4n a ooo n dr : ss e l:Bl: d i sp . evening, a girl who lived in the cellar under the house, and who was playing with some others in the street, ob served the younger prisoner and another boy coming out of the shop, with each a handkerchief containing something in his hand. They closed the door after them. The elder prisoner, a cripple, who is suspected to follow the voca tion of " teaching the young idea how to steal," was seen in company with the two boys that day, and was also ob served going in the direction towards the shop shortly be fore it was broken open. The alarm was given, ard Haynes was apprehended by police-officer M`Taggart (279) while running across a piece of vacant ground in making his way towards Marybone. A handkerchief, con taining a quantity of copper money, which he bad thrown down to disencumber himself, was afterwards picked up near the spot. Four skeleton keys were also found, with one of which it appeared the shop had been opened, and again locked. The property missed was about twelve pounds of tea and £2 ss. in loose copper money. About 61b. of the tea was also recovered, and the copper money in the handkerchief amounted to 30s. As there was a chance of the other boy being found, both the prisoners were remanded, the witnesses, however, being bound over to appear at the sessions, to which they will no doubt be committed for trial this day. LANCASHIRE PRESBYTERY. —Wednesday last was the day fixed for the meeting of this Presbytery. On that day the Rev. Messrs. Campbell, Rennyson, Cleland, Foster, Welsh, and several elders, members of Presby tery, and other gentlemen, repaired to Rodney-street church, the ordinary place of meeting. Mr. Welsh stated that he had received a letter from Mr. Boggle, which stated that Mr. Boggie had been in communication with many individuals in connection with Rodney-street church and that " the intention of the gentlemen adhering to the presbytery of Lancashire to hold a meeting in that church, on Wednesday next, is diametrically opposed to their wishes and will give them great offence ; and further, that in their belief all those that attend such meeting will be acting in contempt of the Court of Chancery, and, con sequently at their own peril." The presbytery, in conse . gse uence, repaired to the vestr y of Oldham-s t r eet church. The Rev. Mr. Clugston, of the Free church, Forfar, was requested to sit as a member of court. An extract of the deliverance of the free presbytery of Forfar was read, agree ityr to the translation of the Rev. D. Fergusson to the pas toral care of the congregation recently formed and meeting in the Mechanics' Institution, and this induction was fixed to take place to-morrow. The presbytery then consented to the translation of the Rev. Mr. Rennyson to one o the churches in Paisley, and they unanimously expressedf " their sympathy with Mr. Munro as to the interference of the Presbytery of Edinburgh with his position as min ister." Robert Barbour, Esq., of Manchester, has sub scribed £lOO towards the erection of the church in Myr tle-street, for the new Presbyterian congregation, of which the Rev. Mr, Fergusson is to be inducted minister. X 50 113 46 53 34 34 Feb. 13, 184-I. LATEST FROM SPAIN. Madrid journals and correspondence of the 4th instant inve het-n received. The Gazette publishes a despatc.t addressed by the Mini s t er o f War to General Roncall, directing him, in the name of the Queen, to shoot the 3 0 insurgents taken prisoners at Alcoy. The Minister re quests him to forward to his department an account o, their execution fo r th e i n f ormat i on of her Majesty, a nd enjoins him not " to allow himself to be stopped by th e fear of any acts o f reta li at i on which the insurgents of Alicant might threaten, for although her Majesty abou t view with grief the victims that the fury of the rebel s might sacrifice, yet th e a b so l ute necessity that the law Oa public vengeance should be a reality weighed still more LA her royal mind." An attempt at insurrection made at Reqnena; had been suppressed by the authorities of Cuena. It appears that the insurrection had some ramification in Valencia, for on hearing of the events at Alicant, the Political Chief had ordered the arrest of several inhabi• tants suspected of being in correspondence with the chid' of the movement. General Roncali has reorganized tie , National Guard of V a l enc i a, an d was to leave on the , with all the disposable troops for Alicant, where be es' pected, in a few days, to concentrate 10,000 men. Brigadier Concha, brother of the General, marched from Madrid with his brigade of cavalry for Ocana on the 4th. The General, who had gone to spend a few dale at Aranjuez, was, however, expected in the capit a l. The Corresponsal finds fault with Mr. Bulwer for ha!: ing invited to his table Messrs. Arguelles. Ferrer, and Tejada, the intimate friends of M. Olozaga. HOUSE OF COMMONS. -SATURDAY. In consequence of the non-attendance of members 01 Friday last, the House of Commons was unable to proceed to business on that day • and thus, th ere h av i ng been n o opportunity of moving the usual adjournment from the Friday to the Monday, the House was under the necessity of meeting on Saturday. Sir JAMES GRAHAM took that occasion for stating briefly the alterations he intended to propose in his bill for the amendment of the Poor-law. As there was consider able difference of opinion on the abolition of the Gilbert Unions, he would not now propose to abolish thenit but would move, on another day, for a select committee to enquire into their operation. The bastardy law in its present, shape had occasioned great dissatisfaction in Wales, and in the north of i England, and he had introduced into this bill a provision, by which, on application being made within forty days from the birth of the child, there should be powe r g iven to two magistrates to make an order of maintenance on the putative father, operating not only against his goods, bat against his person. This order would proceed upon the oath of the mother, fortified by some corroborative evi dence. Another subject which needed the interference of Parliament was the want in large towns of some place of refuge for destitute persons, who now had no shelter but under walls and porticoes. He would propose to establish asylums, where such persons should receive not only shelter, but food at night and food in the morning, on con dition of working for four hours. Captain PECHELL signified his satisfaction at the course proposed with respect to the Gilbert unions. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE expressed himself to the same effect, not only on the subject of the Gilbert unions, but also on that of the bastardy enactments, and that of asylums for the destitute. Mr. BECKETT DENISON, Sir WALTER JAMES, and other gentlemen intimated their gratification at the pro posed improvements. Sir JAMES GRAHAM gave explanations, in answer to several questions ; and after the intervention of a feat words on the subject of prison discipline, the poor law bill wac brought in and read a first time. COMMERCIAL HALL.---it will be seen by an advertise ment in another column, that a ball will take place at this now popular room on Monday next. THE FEBRUARY SESSIONS FOR THIS BOROITGII closed yesterday, about one o'clock. The trials have b e en of little or no public interest. The case of John Mulhol land, charged with obtaining goods on false pretences, was yesterday traversed to the next sessions. STEALING A WATCH.-At the police-court, yesterday , two females, Browne and Jones, were committed for trial at the sessions on a charge of stealing a watch from a man named John Grumbly, on Sunday night in Ml' street. FREE PRESBYTERIAN Cu MlCH.—This body, worship ing at present in the Mechanic's Institution, intend ductingin the Rev. Donald Ferguson, to-morrow, to the office of pastor, whose future scene of labour will shortlY be in Hope-street, near the Baptist chapel, where a good site has been provided for the erection of a church. A joint deputation from London and from Liverpool, relative to the subject of the tea duties, bad an intervic! , with Sir R. Peel, on Saturday, at his official residence in Downing-street. Sir Howard Douglas, M.P., Mr. Pot ter, and Mr. Duckworth, formed the deputation from Liverpool; Sir George Larpent, Mr. John Abel Smith, M.P., and other gentlemen, attended the London depu tation. WARMING AND VENTILATING Rooms.—A number of the models used by Mr. Day, the inventor of the wind guard, to illustrate the lectures he has been giving at Len don, Chester, &c., on warming and ventilating rooms , may be now seen at Mr. Bennett's, Sir Thomas s-build ings, who described them to us, and will to all who maY visit them, in a manner that cannot fail to interest eve' those who have not given the subject a consideration . The screw ventilator is simple and effective. j S ADULTERATION 4F TOBACCO. —W e were furn is hed --, last eight with a report of a ease heard at the 1300-- police-office yesterday, in which the Excise were the pro. secutors, against a tobacco-manufacturer in Bolton. The witnesses for the prosecution proved that the defendant had mixed oil and sugar in manufacturing his tobacco. The defendant's foreman stated that the oil had escaped • from the machinery. The magistrates, however, con sidered the case proved, and fined the defendant £15 0 • It is stated that this is the first of a seri es o f d e t ec ti o ns 01 -: frauds in the tobacco laws. SUNDAY SCHOOL SOCIETY FOR IRELAND.—WC beg ' to call the particular attention of our readers to the a 0• nouncement of a sermon and meeting in aid of this vale• able society, which will be found in our advertising colurall of this date. Distinguished as Liverpool is for the support which it has afforded to the cause of scriptural education , we feel persuaded that on the present occasion there will' be here a cordial and liberal response to the appeals about to be made by the Rev. Dr. Drew, from Ireland. have seen the report which records the gratifying fact that there are at present in connnexion with the Irish Sunday School Society about 3000 schools, attended by 241,129- scholars and 22.922 gratuitous teachers.—We leave this fact to speak for itself, whilst we merely call the Late's. tion of our readers to the anouncement of the sercuoo and meeting. PICTURE OF THE EXCHANGE, WITH DISTINGHISIOP CHARACTERS. —This picture, to be seen at the artist's , Mr. Norman's, 43, Bold-street, is now finished, and is in point of drawing, as well as in the admirable likenesses of the many characters assembled in the area, a spirited, interesting and extraordinary production. How the artist has, by necessarily casual sights of the parties, con trived to catch the figures, faces, and usual attitudes of 5 0 many mercantile men, and others known to fame, i s more than we can divine. They will all be recognised by those to whom their appearance is at all familiar. Amongst them are the following :—Messrs. Barton, Myers, Duck worth, Dixon, awso n T R, Taylor, ,en d d Cooke, Reynolds, B uc h anan , J em i sou , M`Gatli, Rushton, Gar nett, Turner, May, Howard H ar t, M`D ev itt, S m izb, Rat. Horstall, S. Martin, J. Myers, J ones , F ros t, Lieut• a j ‘ " V n W. Rushton' Hul°3 m , G Parsons, Bevis, &c., &c. Several parties have wished to purchase this painting, but, in order to give more gene" ral satisal:tion, the proprietor has determined to dispose of it after the manner of Boys' Art Union. THE PHILHARMONIC SOClETY.—YeStercby evenings Vie first undress concert for the present year of this so' ciety was given in the Lecture-hall of the Collegiate In" stitution. The theatre was very fully attended, the body and the lower gallery being filled to repletion, and the, upper gallery (which i s no t so f avourable for hear i ng) about three-fourths occupied. A miscellaneous selection of music was performed. The opening overture, by Mozart, was effectively played. Th e mus i c appropriated to the witches in Macbeth followed, and was well acconi; - plished :in the vocal department by Misses Foster o' l Leach, and Messrs. Armstrong and Barnett—the latter engaged from Manchester, and a pleasing singer. A very pretty and pathetic glee, the music by Callcott, was then sung by Misses Stott and M. Swain, and Messrs. 0 Sudlow and Armstrong. Miss Stott appeared to us to 1 1 ; 3 , t in extremely good voice. A t r i o , by Beethoven, on violin, violincello, and piano, followed, of great lengin: o ► and somewhat tame and lan g uid. We wou ld no t sigiv the first and second part, a practice which, we thi n k, in its justice n s d r e e rs e t t o i o t repetition, , There if the great a e t a ah v u e t ry o l r at o s n t gi e n d has been interregnum proper l y justice to the ladies present, who have to sit patiently throughout, " were better honoured in the breach than, the observance." At the com mencement of the second be the e i vne w bo h ef t o to l e e ur rband, selected) ) h t i i wo c ne h played an overture from " Der Frieschutz,” by the mast er composer, " Weber," and, we think, did it justice. Being part , h th a the second part (which appears t i w s :fff n r co n wom m ui tiehctri ourselvesiolgreiurosetaatnede e a fi t i . c i programmee main longer, but we have since heard that the whole . o n . • LIVERP 0 OL : TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1844. EVERY PRIN TED AND PUBLISHED TUESDAY ItIoRNING, JOSHUAock ;FLETCHER LAC B E Y , of 53, Grove-street, and Bi rchin-lar.e ß ; e LEONARD ADDISON, of 14, Great Orford-street, At N 0.4, ST. GkonoE's CRBSCENT,LiVBRPOOL. Oders and Advertisements are received by {Messrs. Newt& "d Co, W arwick-square; Barker, Fleet-street; Dorton: ynjoelsle,phChTanhcoemrya-sl,anel: Finch-lane, Hammond, 2; Lombard-street ; Mitchell, Si Lion-conrt, Fleet-street; Clarke and Lewis, 4, Croce court, Threadneedle-street ; Garraway's; at the Lon":„ 0; Commercial Coffee-house, Mincing-lane; at the Jerusal` - l n an a e u , d Co l th i l ll; Coff ee - house, Cornhill; Chapter Coffe:-souse, PaternOst e d: r ow; North arid South American Coffer-house, Thret4 needle-stre e t ; and 111essrs. William Fre ni i, lellaitre, 9 14 Sise-lane, London; by Messrs. J o h ns t on an d CO,lO their Newspaper and Advertisement Agency Office, t•;;;,.. Quay, Dublin; Mr.M`Phun, Glastr.v; Mr. Wheeler, ~S, ellat , ' ~ -street, and Mr. C. H. Lewis, Market-street, b.;,. chester • Haddock, and Messrs. J. and W. B oo th, 0 °: ;i ~si sellers, Warrington ; Mr. Clarke, Pilot-office, Frestcli; '- Mr. Coo li e, 33, Union-street, Birmingham. tel Terms of Subscription for this parer ci one year, £1 3s. ; hatf-yr.nr, 11s. -d ----If paid In advance—one year LI Is. ; half-year, 10. 6d° !le gs , F; 44 a ge It W4l I. of this C orn F l eot t p thi s t was 2 d a b,* 7, at -4 g to lt d M l was c yk 11 1 t, Galt Ap t Ilptt 'se M It its bit t b ° * l %, 14,ti:leth d of /I N] hi, 13 th a bi g ' Ore 411 1 eold k ~P Olt ai th e 21 Ile I 'f:i'' ' ,, i44