The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1836-04-15 00:00:00

LIVERPOOL ASSIZES. NISI PRIUS.-TUESDAY. FARNWORTH AND OX V. L'tON• Verdict for the'plaintiff.—Amount of damages referred. HAZLEHURST V. BROWN AND OTHERS. Mr. Cresswell and Mr. Wightman appeared for the plain tiff, and Mr. Alexander for the defendants. This was an action brought to recover the cost of the Hale, coasting vessel, and the loss of her profits up to the present time ; she having been run down by the Or up steamer, in the Menai, off Bangor, in the month of October last. The defendant admitted the accident. and the counsel for the plaintiff suggested to his lordship that they should go for 'the cost of raising her, that step tieing necessary in order to clear the navigation of the river., , • His Lordship wished to know if the plaintiff would have been liable to an indictment if he had not. cleared the navigation. Mr. CRESSWELL was not aware whether that was the case or nut.' The cost of raising her was about. £1,200. Edward Morgan deposed to being the master of the schooner Hate; on the 10th of October last she was bound to Runcorn with a load of limestone. He had been beating about some time, and was obliged to return to Bangor through stress of weather;l about five o'clock in.the morning with the wind blow ing N.N.E., the mate called out " a vessel a head,", when he immediately put the helm to starboard. :He believed the ves sel to beat anchor, as she had no lights hung out, which is usual with steamers at night. - When at two cables leng,th I disco vered the vessel to be a steamer, going at the rate of five or six knots on hour, and immediately she came upon the bows of the schooner, which instantly went down, and he with his crew jumped aboard the steamer. Thomas and John Roberts, seamen on board the schooner, corroborated the master's evidence. . . John Morris, one of the crew on board the Ormerod on the night in question, was on deck, and called out to the steersman (when he saw the schooner) to put the helm to starboard. They were about a quarter of a m►le distant from each other at that time, and the Ormerod was going at the rate of five or six knots an hour. He perceived the alteration of the Orinerod's course. The vessel came in contact immediately after, and the schooner went down. The crew got on board the steamer. Cross-examined by M - r. ALExeN DE R.—He was receiving 245. a week from the plaintiff's attorney, and was promised a hand some allowance in the event of the action being won. By Mr. Ctiasswzu--His pay was £2. 10s. per month when on board, and his keep besides. Mr. Dane, broker, of Liverpool, deposed to the schooner hav ing once been his property, and that he sold it in May; 1831, for £520. There was an expense afterwards in her outfit of about EA/ Cross-examined.—The vessel was forty or fifty years old. Sbe had been used in carrying . slates. He believed this was not the first time that she had visited the bottom of the sea. Jsaac Fisher deposed to having been accustomed to the sea about 25 years. When vessels met each other, they ought al ways to leave the vessel on the right side when they had the wind free. Steam-boats were always considered to have the -wind free. It is the practice of steamers always to carry a light from dark to daylight. This was the case for the prosecution. Mr. ALEXANDER, for the defence, said he was glad to find the demand now made had assumed a more reasonable aspect. Ori ginally the compensation demanded had been £2,000 for the price of the vessel and her weighing. The defendant's case was this :—That, having weighed anchor some time between five and six in the morning, he observed the schooner in question right a-head of him. He was aware of the usual rule in such cases, and acted accordingly. The vessel seemed to be coining right down on to them, and he instantly starboarded his helm, when, to his great s . trprise, the vessel, which seemed to be drift ing, ported her helm, and was coming right on to them. He tten immediately to save her ported his helm, when to his asto nishment the vessel, still determined to come into collision, star boarded her helm, and, in consequence, in less than tiro minutes they came into collision. It was necessary, in order for the plaintiff to recover damages, that they should be satisfied that he was purely and entirely in the right. He called George Blaekstock, the mate of the.Ormerod, who deposed to starboarding his helm in order to.avoid the schooner, and, she still coming towards him, to porting his helm. to avoid her. The Hale again altered her course and came on to him, when he ordered the engine to be stopped and reversed to avoid a colli sion. 'The schooner was very deep. . Patrick /Wiliam, the engineman and the fireman, deposed to the master ordering the engine to be stopped and reversed. Mr. GassswELL replied.—He submitted that the truth was on the side of the plaintiff's witnesses; he lamented that he never knew a case of this description in which there was not a great deal of hard swearing on one side or the other. His LORDSHIP summed up, and the jury found for the plain tiff £5OO. Mr. ALEXANDER inquired where the -vessel was, as it became theirs now ? His LORDSHIP said it would become theirs on paying a rea sonable salvage, which was three-times more than the vessel was worth. MOON AND ANOTHER'S ASSIGNEES V. GILFILLAN. This was an action brought to recuver the sum of £152 195., being the amount of various remittances alleged to be due to the plaintiffs, as assignees of the estate of Mr. Barswell, a bank rupt, who formerly carried on business at Rio Janeiro. Mr. Cresswell appeared for the plaintiffs, and the Attorney- General for the defendant. Verdict for the plaintiff, £152 19s. by consent, subject to a reference. CALVERT V. TYRER. Mr. Alexander and Mr. Wightman appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Cresswell for the defendant. The plaintiff in this case was in the employment of Mr. Marsh, of Upholland, who has a slate-yard there, and the action was brought to recover compensation for a slander uttered by the defendant against him to Mr. Marsh, by which plaintiff for a short time lost his employment. Mr. Marsh was called, and proved the slander. Mr. CRESSWELL, on behalf of the defendant, agreed to pay the costs; which was agreed to, and the action was settled.' POLLA.RD V. EDW ARDS. Mr. Cresswell appeared for the plaintiffs, and Mr. Alexander for the defence. This was an action brought by the plaintiff against defendant for calling him a " thief." The defendant agreed to pay all costs, and the action was withdrawn. RANKIN V. SPEED. Mr. CRESSWELL, assisted by Mr. CROMPTON , appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. ALEXANDER for the defendant. This was an action brought by the plaintiff. Mr. Rankin, who is an old man of nearly eighty, and in humble circum stances, for damages sustained by him from the defendant's hav ing run over him in his gig, in School lane, Liverpool, on the 3d of November, 1834, by which he had broken the plaintiff's leg. In consequence the plaintiff had lost his business, and had been reduced to great distress. The defendant had, after the accident, taken the plaintiff into his gig, and had afterwards given him a sovereign, but thought that sufficient compensa tion for the injury. James Wilson and a sailor named Hughes proved the acci dent having occurred, and that the defendant was driving at a rapid ‘ rate. (i r. Samuel M'Cullock, surgeon, deposed to being sent for and attending the plaintiff. His thigh bone was broken and did not unite for nearly seventeen weeks after. The plaintiff was poor, and was upwards of eighty years old. He had made no charge. James Cotteral deposed to the defendant being a cooper, and having had six journeymen under him; he was also one. Since this accident the plaintiff's business had been entirely lost, and his shop shut up. Mr. ALEXANDER, in defence, said it was most singular that this action should be brought now, 15 months after the accident. It appeared to him that some person was behind the plaintiff, who had urged him on by tellin g hi m th a t a l ucra ti ve business could be made out of it. Mr. Speed never, till the writ was put into his hands, had any idea but that the circumstance was purely the result of an accident. He had no objection to the old man being made comfortable, but he hoped the costs would not be allowed to go from the defendant to the real parties who brought the action. The JUDGE summed up, and the Jury returned a verdict for the defendant, amount of damage subject to a reference. WA LBANK V. PRESCOT.-AN ATTORNEY'S BILL. Mr. C RES S EL t. and Mr. WIGHTMAN appeared for the plain tiff, and Mr. ALEXANDER for the defendant. Mr. CRESWELL, in opening the case, said the defendant had formerly been a clerk with Mr Morris, attorney, of Wigan, and had been employed by the plaintiffs, who are the assignees of John Swinden filenkorn, a bankrupt, for the sale of some of his property. The defendant now resided at Manchester, and had been introduced to the plaintiff by Mr. Morris, and they had employed him on that recommendation. The defendant sold the property for about £5OO, and, on being applied to for the money, rendered in an account that he had paid off a first mort gage of £4OO, to Mr. M. which he was not authorised to do, and , for the balance tendered in his bill for the sale of the property £lOl 2s. 9d., by which he made the plaintiffs debtors to him. He thought it rather too bad that the attorney's costs of selling, propertv to the amount of £5OO s h ou ld b e £lOO. Mr. WIGHTNIAN.—We must now proceed to tar the bill. His Loii ns HIP, to Mr. Alexander.—Have you any objection to have the bill taNed ? Mr. ALEXANDER. — I have •no objection. Then, supposing the £lOl be established as a reasonable charge for work done, the defendant will be entitled to a verdict? His LORESHlP.—Certainly. • , Mr. ALEXANDER, for the defence, contended that the defen dant had been authorised to hand over the amount of mortgage by Mr. Morris; of Arigan, who employedliim as his agent, and who was attorney for the assignees, and also for the first mort gage, and that be had had much trouble, besides being 1:50,0ut of pocket. He had had•twelve journeys, and had written twenty five letters on one part of the subject and thirty-six On another, and' had otherwise had much trouble, which reduced his charge of £lOl 2s. 9d. to a reasonable charge. Mr. Morris, of Wigan, deposed to having formerly employed the defendant as his clerk, and that he was employed as attorney to the assignees, and also to the first tn. , rtgage, and that he authorised the defendant to act for him as agent. He did not know where the account of the defendant now was, and he could not tell whether the copy produced was a copy of the bill. His LORDSHIP advised that the bill should be referred to some gentleman to be taxed. The Jury intimated their readiness to tax the bill. (Laugh ter.) Verdict for the plaintiff by consent, subject to a reference, the costs to abide the event. JAMES ADMINISTRATRIX V. SANDERSON. Mt. Cresswell and Mr. Wightman appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Alexander for the defendant. This was an action brought by the wife of Mr. James, late Captain of the brig " Tindle," as his administratrix, for £2OO due from the defendant, as wages and commission to her late husband. The plaintiff's husband agreed to go out to the coast of Africa, at a salary of £5 per month, to receive 5 per cent. commission on the cargo. The plaintiff died on his passage home, and the defendant declined paying the commission due to him, on the ground that be had not followed his instructions, whereby he had suffered great loss. Mr. ALEXANDER, for the defence, said he should prove to the uvy by witnesses, that the defendant instead of followin g the tter of instructions seat to him, had utterly neglected it, and that he had been engaged in one continued scene of riot and dehitechery, the result of which was, through his neglect, a loss to the owners of £1095. Mr. Tobin was called and questioned by the learned Judge as to the eastern or practice in such cases. By law the plain tiff was riot entitled to the sum claimed, because the contract into which he had entered was not fulfilled. He engaged to bring the "asset home again, and to render an account of the sales and barter he had transacted,l which owing to his decease he had not done; the claim rested entirely on custom. Mr. Tobin could not say anything of th a t • he might y object ' to pay any commission if great ne g li g e nce ' were l proved, but he did not know bow f be would be borne out His LORD IP suggested that they slionawid. refer the claim to some gentle a to look into all the circumstances, and say what in fairuiss the plaintiff ought to receive. This was 4.ssented, to, and Mr. Charles liersfall was chosen as the referee. NISI PRIUS.—WEDNESDA Y , BOLD V. RA YNER.—SPECIAL JURY CASE. Mr. CuEsswEu., assisted by Mr. CROMPTON, appeared for the plaintiff, and All'. ALEXANDER and Mr. WIGHTMAN for the defendant. The plaintiff, Mr. Bold. is an African merchant iu this to wn, and, in September, 183.3, entered into a contract with Mr. Rayner, then an oil merchant of Liverpool, for the sale of one hundred tuns of palm oil, at thirty guineas a tun, from vessels expected to arrive in November or December. The con tract was entered into through Messrs. Roscow and Rigg, brokers, of this town. The vessels, the Speedy, and the Char lotte, instead of arriving, as was expected, in November or December, 1833, did not arrive until the following May, when the defendant refused to accept the oil, alledging that the con tract was broken by the non-delivery of the oil at the expected time. In consequence of this the plaintiff bad been obliged tct sell the oil for what it would then fetch, and, instead of making £3l 10s. a ton for it, only obtained £25 a ton, by which.he had suffered a lossool£6-10s. a tun. He had also been at other ex penses in tarting, brokerage, warehousing, &c., which he other , wise would not have been at. Mr. Roscow, broker, was called and examined, and proved the making of the contract, through him, by the parties. The contracts of the buyer and seller were put in and read, mid there appeared a verbal difference in them, one setting forth that the buyer agreed to take one hundred tuns of oil at thirty guineas a ton, ex Speedy and Charlotte; the other, ex Speedy or Char lotte.. • • • • • His LORDSHIP deprecated this carelessness in brokers, which sometimes led to very serious results. On his cross-examination, Mr. Roscow did not know whether or not twelve months was the time in which an African vessel ought to make her voyage out and home. • Mr. Amos Bigland deposed to being.a broker in Liverpool, and extensively engaged in the sale of palm oil. He remem bered, early in May, 1834, a vessel called the Speedy arriving from Africa, which was wrecked at the mouth of the. Mersey; she had palm oil on board, which was damaged in consequence and sold to another party. It was not merchantable oil, as dry oil. It was usual to deliver oil on the quay side. He should think if, by contract; oil were sold, expected to arrive by two vessels, that the seller would have the option of choosing which he would sell it from. The voyage to Africa varied very much in length ;- it depended very much on whether the natives were at peace or not. The Charlotte was expected some time before she did arrive. It was thought she was lost. He should think the defendant was bound to receive the oil by his contract though the cargo did not arrive before the 12th of May. In May, palm' oil was worth £25 per tun. Sometimes there was a warranty put into a contract that vessels should arrive on .a certain day, and if in that case they did not arrive the contract was, of course, void; but, if there was no such specification, the parties were bound to receive the oil, on the quav,whenever the vessel arrived. He did not think the statement that the vessel "was expected in a certain tune was a warranty. Cross-examined by Mr. ALEXANDER.—He was not aware that this was a matter of doubt in Liverpool. Mr. A LEXANDER.—Snppose the vessel arrived twelve months after the time expected, should you consider that a performance of the contract on the part of the seller. , • Witness.—l have already said I have never, know it to the contrary. It has always been the custom to take the cargo whenever it arrived, but I do not recollect such an extreme ease as the one put. His LORDSHIP.—You consider it the custom to take the cargo whenever it arrives under the circumstances of such a contract. Witness.—Certainly. His LORDSHIP.—The length of time can make no difference in the principle. Mr. ALEX AN DER,—No my lord; and if it might be ten years it would show the absurdity of the custom. Examination resumed.—Palm oil generally got less in price as the year advanced towards autumn. ; Mr. James Cosnahon examined.—He was captain of the Charlotte, and sailed from Liverpool on the 12th December, 1832, on a bartering voyage to the coast of Africa. The vessel was provisioned for twelve months, and he calculated he should be out ten or eleven. He expected to have had a shorter pas sage both out and• home than he had, and did , not expect to have staid more than six months on the coast instead of which he had been obliged to remain nine. The " Speedy" went out to attend him. Cross-examined by Mr. ALEXANDER.—He was anxious to do his best for his employers and did,not think proper ,;.0 pay the high prices which were asked for palm oil when he went out. Oil was scarce and consequently high priced, owing to a.quarrel amongst the natives, and that was the cause of his delay. He might have paid the high price if he had chosen; the captains of other vessels did so and got home sooner on that account. Re-examined.—They received a commission on the cargo after their returns, according to the amount it sold for. Mr. CRESSWELL submitted that there was an item of expense for cartage, porterage, brokerage, and warehousing, which they should not otherwise have had to pay, which they also were en titled tu. The whole amount for this was £36; and taking the average of the price in Slay, when the plaintiff was obliged to sell the oil at £25 per tun, it left a loss to the plaintiff of £6.10. a tun on the contract price, which would amount, on one hun dred tuns, to £650, and with the above item to £686. Mr. Bigland by the JUDGE.—If vessels were lost, and the cargoes arrived by other means, there might be some doubt whether the owners were bound to deliver the cargo. If the ves sels arrived without the oil, the contract was void. Mr. ALEXANDER, in defence, contended•that the contract was undoubtedly entered into on the part of the defendant in the expectation of the vessel arriving at a certain time, when palm oil would be likely to fetch a certain price; and, if it did not arrive at that time, but six months afterwards, when palm oil was likely to be much cheaper, it was absurd to suppose that the original contract was made with any other than the direct under standing that the oil would be received in December; the contract was, therefore, void. He did not impute any fraudulent motive to Mr. Bold. He had no doubt but that, when he made that contract, be expected the vessel would arrive as stated in the contract. He contended that the delay had arisen from the captain's over anxiety to serve his employer; that he might, if he had chosen, have made the voyage in the same time as others did. Mr. CRESSWELL replied. His LORDSHIP, in summing up, said brokers should take no tice of the great responsibility they incurred in not making the contracts of the buying and selling parties correspond. If any dispute should occur in consequence, they would be responsible to make the amount good. In Mr. Bold's note nothing was mentioned of when the vessel was expected to arrive. In his opinion expectation to arrive was notantended to mean a war rant to arrives it merely represented from the seller that the cargo was expected to arrive in that time. The question was, whether Mr. Bold had not a reasonable expectation that the cargo would arrive in November, and did not make a fraudulent representation for the purpose of getting a higher price ? The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, damages £686, with leave to move it to a higher court. BOLD V. JUDSON AND ANOTHER.—(BEFORE A SPECIAL JURY.) This case was brought on precisely the same grounds as the last. Mr. CRESSWELL, on the part of the plaintiff, said this was precisely a similar case to the last. Mr. ALEXANDER acceded to the same verdict being passed. BOLD V. MARTIN. The Attorney-General and Mr. Crompton appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Cresswell and Mr. Wightman for the de fendant. This was an action brought under similar circumstances to the two preceding ones. It was brought to recover the amount of difference in the market, due to the plaintiff for 30 tuns of palm oil, sold by contract for £3O odd a ton. It was alleged for the defence, that Mr. Roscow, the broker, through whose hands the contract was made, had no authority to make such contract on the part of defendant. The oil was afterwards sold for £25 a tun. Verdict for the plaintiff, damages £144 7s. THOMPSON V. M`XENZIE. Mr. Crompton appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Cresswell for the defendant. This was an action brought to recover a balance of wages due to the plaintiff, amounting to £23, for working on the line of railway between this town, and Manchester, by the defend ant, who was the contractor. The defendant refused to pay, and told plaintiff be might go to law v. ith him about it—that he never lost a law suit in his life. The several items of the bill were proved. The case was referred by consent to arbitration. DUCKWORTH V. ALISON. Mr. Alexander and Mr. Crompton appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Cresswell for the defendant. This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who is a builder, and who contracted for the erection of a warehouse for the de fendant, for a balance of £B6, for work and labour done. Mr. ALEXAN DER, on the part of the plaintiff, offered to refer it to arbitration, but which was declined. The jury found a verdict for the defendant. MOORE AND OTHERS V. LYTHGOE. Mr. Cresswell appealed for the plaintiff, and Mr. Alexander for the defendant. This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover a part of the cargo of a vessel, the new Felix Solini, chartered by the defendant, which had been shipwrecked near the Bahamas, and the cargo sold by the master, and the amount remitted to Mr. Lythgoe in specie. The various shippers had applied to Mr. Lythgoe for their proportions of the sale, and an average had been made out by Mr. Bushby, of London; Mr. Lythgoe had, however, referred to give up the money. It was contended for the defence that Mr. Lythgoe was willing to have paid the money if the shippers would have given him a bond of indemn ity. The case was argued at length. 'His Lordship said if the cargo was sold by the captain there was no doubt but the defendant was responsible, as the captain was acting as his servant. If the goods were sold by somebody else he was responsible as soon as he had agreed with the own ers as to their respective portions, which had been done in this case by referring to Mr. Bushby. His opinion was that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. Mr. ALEXANDER.—We will take your opinion. Verdict fur the plaintiff accordingly.—Damages, £lB2 2s. Three other cases precisely similar, in which the defendan in this action was - also the defendant, depended on the result. — Verdicts accordingly. REX v. MYERS. Mr. Cresswell and Mr. Henderson appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Wightman for the defendant. This was an inquiry whether Mr. Myers, of Liverpool, had a tight to fix certain posts before his warehouse in George-street. Ten years ago Mr. Myers and others had built the warehouses three feet further back than the site of the former buildings, thus giving the public an additional advantage of three feet of footway. Lately Mr. Myers had erected some posts to prevent the public going °vet these three feet of road, as they walked over his cellar doors. Though there was no doubt the land be longed to Mr. Myers, vet it was contended .that, having dedi cated this footway to the, public, and they having enjoyed it for ten years, he harinow no right to take it away from them. The jury returned a verdict for the crown. This case concluded the cause list, and the court rose at half past six o'clock, the assizes having occupied a fortnight. LIVERPOOL QUARTER SESSIONS. The business of the assizes occupying both courts in the Ses sion-house, at ten o'clock on Monday morning, the Mayor, W. W. Currie, Esq., the Recorder, James Clarke, Esq. and several of the borough magistrates, met at the Magistrates'-room, in the Session-house, where the business of the sessions was forinerlly opened, and such of the new magistrates as were pre sent sworn into office. An adjournment then took place to the Police-office. The followinggentlemen were sworn as the Grand Jury: Richard Houghton,. Esq. Foreman. Tho. Oldfield Cooper, , J. Lea, Wm. Cartwright, Harold Littledale, Thos. N. Carter, : James Molyneux, John Foster, jun. J. Manifold, Gibbons, W. J. Myers, James M. Gardner, John Mather, Robert Horsfall, Win. Nixon, Roger Hunter, John Roht. Preston, G. B. Irlam, James Ritson, E. W. Jackson, James Rvley, jun and B. H. Jones, Thos. Esqrs. The usual proclamation against vice, profaneness, and immo rality baying been read, The RECORDER delivered his charge to the Grand Jury. The learned gentleman among some other judicious recommenda tions suggested the propriety of altering the periods for holding the sessions, so that they might not suffer the inconvenience arising from their being held during the sittings of the Judges of assize. _ _ The Grand Jury after having gone through all the bills, made the following presentation :—They begged to direct the atten- THE'LIVERPOOL STANDARD. ion of the corporation to the dangerous state of a public-house at the corner of Liver-street, in Mersey-street. They gave great credit to the new police for the manner in which they gave their evidence while before them, and for the prompt and efficient check they had been to the growth of crime. They also recommended an increase of its numbers, so that the sub burbs might be benefitted by its establishment. The Recorder, in dismissing the Grand Jury, observed, that this was the list session that would be held under the ancient charter of the borough. That the whole jurisdiction Would soon be vested iu the corporation, when be had no doubt but their presentation would be attended to. The establishment of a police for the suburbs, similar to that established for the town, would greatly add to to its efficiency, as the jurisdiction, by the new_municipal act, will extend seven miles round. The following gentlemen took the oaths, and qualified as magistratesior the borough :—Hardman Earle, William Earle, R. E. Harvey, and William Rathbone, Esors. TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1836. Mary Kelly, 18, was charged with stealing a coat and cloak, the property of Henry Medder and George Byford, in February last . , , and found guilty; sentenced to fourmonths' imprisonment in the Borough gaol. Mary Murphy, 40, was charged with stealing 23 pair of slippers,• the property of John Anderton; fotind guilty, and sentenced to twelve months' imprisonment in the Borough gaol. John Woods, 20, charged with stealing sundry articles of wear ing apparel, the property . of John Charnock. Guilty, and sentenced to six months' imprisonment in the Kirkdale House of Correction. _ _ John Myers, 20, was charged with stealing a quantity of plate, :he property of Charles Burgess. Previously convicted of a ike offence. Guilty, and sentenced to be transported for four teen years. _ _ John Harris, 18, was charged with stealing a diamond, a quantity of solder, and Prussian blue, the property . of William Dry, jun. Guilty, and sentenced to four months in the Kirk dale House of Correction. . John Macwell, 24; wi.Scharged with stealing a pair of boots, .he proFerty of William Wiskett. Guilty, ,and sentenced to .hree months in the Kirkdale House of Correction. . . Richard Foster, 23, was charged with stealing a chair, the property of John Robinson,-Stanley-street. Guilty, and sen tenced to three months' imprisonment in Kirkdale House of Correction. Eliza Fairhurst, -1.2 and Mary Fairhurst, 44, mother and daughter. The former was charged with stealing eleven ducks, a tray, and a towel, the property of Edw. M'Cortnick, in thel New Market, and the latter with receiving the same, knowing them to be stolen. The former pleaded guilty, and was sen tenced to one months' imprisonment in the Borough gaol, and the latter totwelve months'. in Kirkdale. • John Blackluck, 24, and Robert Holliday, 27, were charged with stealing 700 skins, the property of R. Roscow and Co.; guilty, and sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment in Kirkdale House of Correction. Edward Evans, 15, Wm Skelhorn, 12, Edwin Roberts, 13, were charged with stealing a writing-desk and work-box, the property of Ellen- Chambers, on the 4th of March last. Guilty. The former was sentenced to nine months' imprisonment in the Kirkdale House of Correction, and the two latter to 6 mouths in the Borough gaol, the last 14 days to solitary confinement, and to be twice whipped. James Steele, 21. was found guilty of stealing a. quantity of print, the property of Elizabeth tennison, and sentenced to nine months' imprisonment in Kirkdale House of Correction. Ellen Roberts, 22, was charged with stealing a quantity, of wearing apparel and bed linen, the property of her master, Jacob Hunt. Guilty, and sentenced to fifteen months' im prisonment in Kirkdale House of Correction. Solomon Jackson, 27, and John. Haskell, 32, the former was charged with. stealing a quantity of wearing apparel, the pro perty of Jno. S. Clarke ; and the latter with receiving the same. knowing it to be stolen. Guilty. The former was sentenced to six months' imprisonment, and the latter was acquitted. Thomas Connolly, 19, charged with stealing a watch and sun dry other articles, the property of Sarah Fishwick, was acquit ted. Henry Evans, 19, was cbarged with stealing a brass machine, .called an upright, and sundry other articles, the property of Ed ward Evans, on the 16th of March last.—Guilty, and sentenced to six months' imprisonment in Kirkdale House of. Correction. John Jones, 16, was found guilty of stealing a sum money, the property of George Walker, and sentence deferred. John Leyland, 28, a young man of very respectable exterior, was placed at the bar charged with embezzling several sums of money, the property of his employers, Messrs. John Mather. and Co. It may be in the recollection of our reader's that this young man when apprehended, attempted to shoot himself, and in doing so, nearly shot one of the officers. The charge was fully proved against the prisoner, and he was sentenced to twelve months' imprisonment in the House of Correction. There were other indictments against the prisoner, but they were abandoned. John Jones, 39, charged with stealing a hand cart, the pro perty of William and Samuel Cliff, and a piece of iron, their property. Guilty—four months in the House of Correction. Ann Stretch, 24, for stealing a watch and a sum of money, the property of George Gilbert Cocks. Sentenced to twelve months in the House of Correction. Ann Collins, 24, charged with stealing two pair of stays, the property of William Edmunds. Guilty—sentenced to seven years' transportation. The calendar contains the names of fifty-nine prisoners for felony, and twenty-one for misdemeanors and assaults. It is expected the session will last the principle part of the week. WEDNESDAY. EXTENSIVE ROBBERY. Thomas Taylor, 23: Thomas Jones, 19, John Allen, 25, .Tames Howarth, 33, Charles Jackson, 20, were indicted for stealing a number of bank notes and sovereigns amounting to upwards of £6OO, from the dwelling-house of Mr. William Ownes, grocer, Dennison-street. The prisoner, Taylor, pleaded guilty. The other prisoners pleaded not guilty. [When the prisoners were examined before the magistrate, we gave a detailed account of the manner in which this robbery was committed. The evidence given against them on Wednes day was precisely the same, therefore, it would be superfluous to repeat it here.] The prisoners were all found guilty, and were sentenced to be transported for life. OBTAINING MONEY UNDER FALSE PRETENCES. William Spence, 25, a young a man of respectable appearance was charged with haviug received the sum of £5 14s. Od. under false pretences. It appeared from the evidence, that the prisoner had formerly been in the employ of Mr. Potter, mustard manufacturer, at Manchester. In the month of FebrUary last, he came over to Liverpool, without the orders of his employer, and presented an account to Mr Jones, grocer, Whitechapel, which Mr. Jones paid to the prisoner, not doubting but he was authorised by Mr. Potter to receive it. .* The jury found the prisoner guilty, but recommended him to mercy. tore that he was confident the jury would think that the small est •coin in the realm would be sufficient compensation. John Hill deposed to being a son of the defendant, and to re membering the plaintiff and two men coining to his father's yard in October last with a crate and some carboys. He said he had brought some carboys, and had come to pay a bill. Wit ness told him he could not receive it, as his father had put it into the hands of his attorney. The plaintiff then called him an impudent blackguard, and a puppy. He then went for his fa ther, who was very angry. Walker was also in a passion. Rubt. Thompson Hill corroborated this statement. His fa ther did not strike the plaintiff. Other witnesses were called who deposed to the plaintiff re fusing to leave the defendant's yard, and to the defendant then pushing him out. Mr. VENABLES replied.—He contended if his client had been litigiously inclined he might have brought an action against the defendant and his suns for false imprisonment. The Recorder summed up, and the jury found for the plain tiff, damages 40s. EDUCATION FOR THE POOR. TO THE WORSHIPFUL THE MAYOR OF LIVERPOOL. is a well-established fact, that throughout the physi cal world there exist laws, the infringement of which, unless averted by Divine interposition, is invariably followed by a cor responding punishment, nor is the infliction less certain that iu many cases it is silent and protracted in its approach. The same holds true in the moral world. An Almighty hand has interwoven the one with the constitution of nature ; the other forms the support of the social system. The present apparently deranged and agitated state of so ciety is unquestionably to be attributed to this prolific source of evil, and however difficult it may now be to lead a direct proof to the specific fact, it is, nevertheless, a very prevailing opinion that the seeds of moral evil which 'seem so fast ripening: into 'startling luxuriance around us were sown during that period in the history of the country, when the unexampled prosperity of her commercial speculations, uniting with her splendid success in arms, combined to raise her, as if by common consent, to the giddy rank of queen among the nations. Then every eye seemed rivetted, as by a spell, upon her apparently invincible power and inexhaustible resources ; whilst the nation itself reeled un der the influence of the intoxicating draught. That sobriety and forethought which had, for a length of time, characterised her gave way, and the spirit of intolerable pride and self-confi dence succeeded. Attracted by the dazzling ornaments around the top of the social fabric on which the spirit-stirring names of Nelson and Wellington were inscribed, her eye was altogether withdrawn from its foundation, and perceived net that a sure undermining process‘ was making good a lodgment there—a moral precipitate—which would at no very distant period cause the pile, noble and indestructible as it then seemed, to totter to its base. The earlier indications of the real state of matters at this pe riod made their appearance when the high pressure of war, with all its deceptive blandishments, were removed. A general dis affection manifested itself ii; every quarter among the working classes. Fearful, daring crime stalked abroad, and the most astounding ignorance was disclosed as pervading the lower ranks of the community. Happily with the discovery of the nature of the disease arose also the most laudable exertions in bringing forward the only effectual remedy, viz., an efficient education. Sunday schools for the children of the industrious poor then first started into general operation, associated with which, in honoured remembrance, stands the name of Richard Itaikes, while Bell and Lancaster's system of tuition in public week-day schools successively attracted the public attention. Of all these it may be said that they promised much, loomed large, and fed to admiration that excessive itching after the display so inherent in the national character. They contributed however not a little towards allaying for a time much of the overt actings of the distemper, but being far too superficial they went not deep enough—fell short of rationally gratifying the ceaseless craving of the young spirit for knowledge—trifled too much with instead of feeding it. Such was the state of the-edu cation question at no distant period in England, so tar as the interests of the poor are concerned, and we fear remains to this day much as it was. But turn we to Scotland. On the morning of the Ist of January, 1812, a riot, ending in the loss of several lives, took place in the streets of Edinburgh, which, by awakening the public mind to the state of matters in that city, disclosed, upon investigation, such an alarming ex tent of youthful depravity and crime, as called forth the most active energies of both clergymen and magistrates. From the former, as its natural source, originated a scheme of general, and especially religious education for the children of the poor, which, after receiving the sanction of the then Lord Provost and magistrates, and universal support from all classes of the citizens was immediately put into operation. Through the working of the Sabbath school departilient of this scheme it came to light that not less than 300 of the children, nearly one fourth of the whole, were actually unable to read. For these 300 children a week-day school was immediately resolved upon, and finally established under the name of the Edinburgh Ses sional School." In this school a gentleman, a native of Eng land, and a much attached member of her church, Mr. Sheriff Wood, from sheer love to the work of instructing the poor, un dertook the charge of these Scottish children, and originated a system of teaching which, while it trains the intellectual facul ties, imparts at the same time the best method of communicat ing knowledge to the mind—two points manifestly essential to a right education, but too frequently left out of the account; and so, by strewing the way with flowers and fruit, fairly cap tivated the young mind to a love of that which, by almost every previous publicly recognised method, became a most revolting task. To this method of communicating the ordinary elements of education, and training the mind to the acquirement of know ledge is very commonly given the name of the "intellectual system," but is more generally known, perhaps, by the name of its respected author. The elements of it are few and simple, and as it becomes every individual interested to any degree in the education of poor children, (and who is not so ?) I may take occasion in connection with the purposed superintendence of the corporation schools by the town council to address your worship on it more particularly hereafter. Almost simultaneously with the educational movement in Edin burgh, another was going on in Glasgow, the mainspring of which was an individual, honoured in every land for his regard to the interests of the poor—the Rev. Dr. Chalmers. In one of the most vice-abandoned corners of this very populous parish he opened, and for a length of time taught or superintended, the first Sabbath evening school, upon the local principle : and now Glasgow is covered with them. The moral energy at that period infused into society of Glasgow, by the educational movement, has never since subsided. It passed from the Sabbath school to the parish school, in every which seminary in Scotland, within these few years, a complete reformation has taken place. Long as I fear your worship will consider this exordium, it is not without a point, and to that I would now more particularly direct your attention. I am given to understand that many influential persons in Liverpool are now directing their attention to this important subject, viz., the education, and especially the moral and religious education, of the poor ; and high time it is, sir, if we may credit report respecting the result of the investigation lately instituted by the town council into the state of crime and mmorality in the community, unless indeed they intend to wait, till the cry of murder and still more daring robberies shall startle them into activity. And there is one feature of the case to which, I believe, they are especially directing their eye, and wise they are in so doing, for it is a feature which, faithful as an index, marks with unfailing truth the state of general morals, viz., the desecration of the Sabbath, existing throughout the whole lower parts of the town. Gentlemen living distant from the river, or in the upper parts of the town, can have no con ception of its extent. But lam told they are looking towards your new police, sir, for a cure of this among other things, so far as the young are concerned ! Beware of it, sir, I entreat you. Such au interference can be but a salvo at best—a mere covering up of the sore in all its festering power. It may take the nuisance from the public eye, perhaps, but only to spread the more se curely in private; besides, does not every man's experience tell him how the thing will work—driven from one street by,the police, the children will, of course, fly to the next adjoining, and, when disturbed there, return very possibly to the one they had just left—or compel them to run for it to the fields; if the police are not prepared to follow them, there also, is the matter essentially mended ? Or even suppose they succeed in confin ing them to their own homes on the Sabbath evening, (which we hold to be beyond the power of any police whatever, be they public or private, hired or voluntary,) will this reach the cause or seat of the disease ? Let any gentleman take a walk down any of the streets leading out of Vauxhall-road, in the north end, or Park-lane and St. James's-street towards the docks, in the south end of the town, on a Sabbath evening, between the hours of six and seven o'clock—let him a pay a visit to any of the courts, or the houses and cellars in these streets, and then let him answer in the affirmative if he dare. The thing is absurd ; and I need not tell your worship is, except to a certain extent, absolutely beyond the commission of the police; yet should you, sir, be applied to, either publicly or privately, on this subject, may I entreat your reply may he to the following effect :—" Gentlemen,—'These are young rational creatures like ourselves, and are not to be coerced or driven as they may do cattle. Cannot you find employment for them on the Sabbath evening—siiitable rational employment ? I have heard of the local Sabbath evening schools of Scotland, unless you suggest something better, of the same rational and appropriate charac ter, in the name of common . sense, why not resort to them Scotland is studded, with them.; why should not England be so too ? Say no more about' the police, I advise you, until you have discharged your own duty as citizens. And the fact is, gentlemen, establish Sabbath evening schools, on a rational principle, in the streets and lanes of Liverpool, and by and by there will be much less need for a police establishment." Say ing so, sir, you will say the truth. And now, sir, allow me to do what 1 feel I should have done before—apelogise for this letter—and yet, I fear, it will be an awkward apology, for I am constrained to say that . you have brought it upon yourself ! I saw you presiding at a meeting in the Mechanics' Institution a few weeks ago, which was as much an honour to the important situation you till, as your manner of acquitting yourself on that interesting occasion did credit both to your head and heart. Sir, lam persuaded that in you the young have a warm, steady, and enlightened friend. &'ou are an advocate of general instruction for the poor; you will not hold back when religious instruction, on a sound and rational principle, is proffered to them; and, under the mayoralty of William Wallace Currie, I trust yet to see the poorest outcast Child in Liverpool withdrawn from the glaring desecration of the " Holy Sabbath Eve," and placed under such a system of moral anu religious training as shall best fit him for the active dsties of his humble life, and which, by opening up to his young mind, rationally and intelligibly, the prospects which the gospel holds forth to his young faith, may bring him within the reach, happily into a participation in, the only effectual, because the only divinely appointed, remedy for the moral evil of the human heart. Esteeming the placing an individual so admirably qualified as your worship is, in such a high and influential office, over such a community, in such times, is not only a great public blessing in itself, but the germ of many snore, I pray you may long enjoy it, and remain, sir, your very obedient servant, Liverpool, 301 h March, 1836. EMBEZZLEMENT BY A SERVANT. Benjamin Le7.;;st2;,;;;Chiried with h av ing embezzled the sum of six shillings, the property of his employer. It appeared that the prisoner had been in the employ of Mr. Charles Bamford, linen-draper, Dale-street, for about three months, and in consequence of the extravagent manner in which the prisoner had been living, he was led to believe that he was not honest. In the month of February, the prosecutor gave a person six shillings in silver, having first put a particular mark upon each, and desired him to go to his, (the prosecutors' shop) and purchase a piece of linen, which, having been done, th e prisoner, instead of putting the money into the till, put it into his own pocket. . Two hours afterwards he was taken into custody, and the six shillings mentioned were found in his pos session. Several witnesses were called who gave him an excellent character, and the jury found a verdict of not guilty. [We had prepared a detailed account of the trials of several of the prisoners at these sessions, but have been obliged to omit it, through a press of more important and interesting matter.] COURT OF PASSAGE. (Before WILLIAM - WALLACE CURRIE, Esq., Mayor, and JAMES CLARKE, Esq., Recorder. SPENCER V. M`KNIGHT. Mr. Venal)les appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Henderson for the defendant. This was an action brought to recover the sum of £8 45., the value of seven packs of seconds flour, furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant, which were eventually returned by the de fendant, the flour being inferior in quality; £4 had been paid in part payment. John Clarke deposed to being a carter in the employment of the plaintiff. He recollected taking seven packs of seconds flour to the defendants in Atherton-street, in August last. Cross-examined.—He first took the flour to Mrs. Thompson, who refused it, and afterwards took it to Mr. McKnight. . Re-examined.—He could not swear that the flour he took to Mr. M‘Knight's was the same as he took to Mrs. Thompsons. Mr. Joseph Cowell and Mr. Henry Jones, flour dealers, proved that the value of seconds flour deteriorated towards the end of last year, and that flour would get worse from being kept in a baker's warehouse. Mr. HENDERSON for the defence, contended that the quality. of the flour was such that it was unsaleable, and that his client had had much of it returned on his hands from his customers, it was so bad. Charles Pearson deposed to being in the employment of the defendant, who kept a flour shop, and to his master having some very bad flour from the plaintiff. Cross-examined.—He did not know when it was. Mrs. Ellen Thompson deposed to keeping a flour dealers shop in Dale-street. She recollected having some packs of flour from Mr. Spencer last summer. She returned the flour because, itwas not good. Mr. Spencer sent for it away. Cross-examined.—She only tried a part of it, not all. Alexander Pattison deposed to being a baker, " ever since he knew anything and nothing else," He had examined some flour at the defendant's shop the day before. It was very in different in quality, and iu his opinion had never been good. He had a sample of bread made from it, if the court wished to see it. (He produced a small loaf of black bread, the exhibi tion of which created much merriment.) Mr. VENABLES replied. The REconnEa summed up, and the jury not being able to agree upon the verdict, were locked up for the greater part of the day. They had not come to a decision when the court ad journed. WALKER V. BILL. Mr. Venables appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Cotting ham for the defendant. This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who is clerk to Mr. Sinclair, glass manufacturer, against Mr. Hill, who is a chemist, for compensation for an assault. Thomas Long deposed to being in the employment of Mr. Sinclair, glass manufacturer. Mr. Walker was clerk with srr. Sinclair. He recollected going with some carboys to Mr. Hill, who is a chemist, in Vauxhall-road, in April last. Mr. Walker went with him. Mr. Walker told Mr. Hill that he had come to settle an account and to fetch some empty carboys. Mr. Hill told him to go to his attorney, that be could not receive any money. Mr. Hill then ordered his men to tie a rope to the carboys and hang them about their necks, and shut the gate to prevent them going out, and told his son to fgtch a police officer. They could not get out of the yard, and Mr. Walker attempted to do so, and . before he had got out. Mr. Hill struck him on the breast; he then pushed him round out of the gate, and effected his exit by giving him a kick on the seat of honour. Mr. Walker made use of no offensive language whatever. Mr. Hill would have used him worse if his own men had not pre vented him. Cross-examined.—Mr. Hill wanted them to take the carboys away. He did not tear Mr. Walker's coat or trousers. There were nine or ten persons in Mr. Hill's yard. Mr. Hill's sons were in the yard; he never heard plaintiff call them young puppies or blackguards. He never heard that the debt that Walker was going to pay had been owing twelve months. William Strout deposed to being in Mr. Sinclair's employ ment, and going with the last witness to deliver some carboys to Mr. Hill. He corroborated the last witness. Cross-examined.—There was a dispute whether they should leave the carboys or not. It was not a very hard blow, not a "regular knock-downer." Mr. Walker would not soil his lips with such words as blackguard. Mr. Walker was not "sick, sore, nervous, and lame for five days afterwards;" he did not see much difference in him. Mr. COTTINGHAM spoke in defence.—A verdict must go against his client because there was no doubt but that the as sault bad been committed ; but the assault was of such a na- VIATOR, JULIO REGONDI'S CONCEIITS.--Master Regondi has an nounced his intention of giving two concerts at the Templars' Hall; the first on Tuesday evening next, hnd the second on the morning of the following day. His professional engage ments elsewhere, will, we understand, prevent him from re maining in Liverpool beyond that time. HUMAN LIFE SHORTER THAN FORMERLY.—In the letters of the late Mr. Sadler a curious calculation is made, which runs strangely counter to the generally received impression, that human life is now of longer duration than formerly. He men tions that, in the manufacturing districts, the mean duration of human life, calculated upon the mortuary registers of 1830, 1831, and 1832, and making no deduction for the ravages of the small pox in former times, is less that it was in the corresponding years half a century ago. This he illustrates by ta bles of the deaths in the town of Leeds, in the years just mentioned, and in the year 1780, 1781, and 1782, which appear. to till pport his assertion. The cause is ascribed to " the deleterious nature of the present system of employment and labour, and the consequent habits and condition of the people."—Globe. [The .letters to which this paragraph alludes are addressed to Mr. Commissioner Drinkwater, and completely vindicate Mr. Rickman's com parative tables, appended to the report of the Factory Com mittee, of which Mr. Sadler was chairman. Those tables established this frightful position, "that about as many have died before their twentieth year where the factory system ex tensively prevails as before their fortieth year elsewhere."] — Morning Pus:. importo. AFRICA - Vesta, Tucker, fin Sierra Leone, with 2 t camwood, 1808 bus rice, 10 bgs ginger, 5 cs gums, 2 bales cotton, 75 dry o and c hides, 10 brls pepper, 26 bxs arrowroot, 1' II Langley—G Dk EAST INDIES. CAPE OF GOOD HOPE, 8, , c. Bland, Callan, fm Calcutta and Madras, with (fm Calcutta) 1542 bgs saltpetre, 355 hales cotton, 1717 hdls munjeet, 1850 ps sapan wood, 537 bgs sugar, W F Porter and Son-7318 bgs linseed, 15 his hides, 1 ble goat skins, \V Shand and co-1 srnl bx scarfs, Crary, Fletcher and co —2 bls raw silk, Gladstones and co-2 bgs rice, It F . Porter—l ppe 3cs wine, Lieut Marsden-9 bxs beer, 51 Joseph and co-1 cse images, 3 cs preserves, 1 box cheroots, said Captain-1 bx contents unknown, M'Crackan and co-1 prcl do, Ogilvy and co-1 do, 1M Kelsall-16 cs 8 bxs linseed and castor oil, 1 bd tincal, 47 es shellac, 1 hg sugar, 1 bg cotree, 802 bgs rice, 1 bx curry powder, 5 bls raw silk, 10 cs silk goons 300 bales cotton, O r d er —(f m Madras) 15 tnks hkfs, Order—P Dk UNITED STATES. Isabella, Wood, fm Savannah, with 1203 bales cotton, W and J Brown and co-67 do, Collmann, Lambert and co-102 do, Sands, Hodgson and co-359 do, Order-86 do, T Wilson and co-63 do, Ros kell, Ogden and co-20 do, Cannon, Miller and co-4 c2B deals, For Exportation—P Dk SOUTH AMERICA. Portents, Bleasdale, fin Laguna de Terminos, with 260 t logwood, 2 bxs wax figures, 1 bskt shells, 1 bx conts unkn, C Tayleur, Sons and co-3 bxs conts unkn, Cotesworth and Smith-2 crts potatoes, J& G Campbell—G Dk Boyne, Forster, fm Monte Video, with 7 his hair, 1 ble horse hair, 110 t bones, G Barker and co-4 bls horse hair, G A Thomson-6310 salted hides, Order-48 bales hide cuttings, For Exportation—G Dk MEDITERRANEAN. St Francesco, Piaggio, fm Genoa, with 145 bls 1 prcl waste silk, 121 cks drugs, 37 mats, 5 bxs 6 pkgs I ble conts unkn, 2 bxs maccaroni or vermicelli, 76 bales wool, 1 cse mushrooms, 26 bales madder roots, 16 bales hemp, 2 bxs artificial flowers, Order-2 bales conts unkn, C Zee-1 cse do, Giavi Bros-1 do, G Dunner—] cse books, Vianna and Jones-1 ble carpeting, Watson and Badland-3 cs chairs, Earle &co Dk Sarah, Carpenter, fm Cephalonia, with 220 bts 193 crtls currants, 2 t fustic, M`Andrew and Pilcher-1 crtl 3 brls currants, 1 cse chimny ornaments, said Master—K Dk SPAIN AND PORTUGAL Las Vargas, Muenecas, fm Santandar, with 7 tons pig iron, J & W Crump and co—G Dk Oporto, Gregory, fm Oporto, with 14 pps 12 hds 22 qr cks wine, T 0 Cooper-10 pps do, E Armstrong-8 qr cks do, J Simpson-4 hds do. .T Fox-3 pps do, J Gaskarth-2 hds 6qr cks do, J Sleddall-1 ppe 2 hds do, T Stavert-4 hds do, R Gardner-1 ppe do, R Brancker jun -Ihd do, J G OugVerson-2 pps do, J& A Preston-3 hds do, 0 Hey worth and co--6 Tips do, 3 Knowles, Son and co-2 pps 10 hds do, E Pratt-5 hds 10 qr cks do4Duarte Bros-1 ppe do, T Barber-5 hds do, W Gibb-3 pps 6 hds 4qr cks do, Molvneux and co-2 pps do, Darbi shire and co—t 2 pps do, Alanson and Brandreth-2 pps 4 hds do, T Stavert-2 hds do, Lewin and Lassell-4 pps 1() hds 4 cir cks do, A J da Costa-3 qr cks do, Leech and Harrison-2 pps do, R Preston &co —2Ol es do, J Hargreaves-101 do, C and 3 Rawdon-90 pps 34 hds 4 qr cks do, 1 pkge plums,. Order-50, brls argol, 4 t corkwood, 1 hf chst oranges, T Martin and Son—G Dk g-"Aipptng Entritignue. TUESDAY, APRIL 12.—Noon, Wind N.W.—Fair. Alum - nip—The Vestal, Tucker, from Sierra Leone—De Vargas, Muncass, from Santander—Ellen German, Blundell, from Lisbon— San Francisco, Pagid, from Genoa—Florence, Cundy, from London— Boyne, Foster, from Monte Video—Bland, Callan, from Calcutta, sailed from the Sand Heads 13th Dec. Madras 30th, and from St. He lena the 'kith Feb. SAILED—The Admiral Benbow, Powdrell ; Dibdin, Hutcheson ; & Sir Howard Douglas, Hunter, for Quebec—_Henry, Jobling, for Pug wash—Britannia, Harding ; and Oconee,ilson, for New York—Ann, Penrice, for Antigua—Nereid, Jarvis, for Lisbon—Forth, Williamson, for JaMaica—Heyes, Nagle, for Barbados—Howson, Bayes, for Que bec—Ardent, Hartgrave, for Prince Edtvard's Island—Prince George, Friend, for Quebec—Rothschild, Lindley, for New York—Sceptre, Barclay, for Hayti—Sir Alexander Campbell, Cockerell, for Bathurst —Princess Victoria, Gray, and Lord Ravensworth, Newman, for Mon treal—Harmony, Hunter, for Tatmagouche—Fanny and Jane, Lover ing, for Leghorn—,N erio, Jarvis, for Lisbon. The Bombay Packet, GarnOck, from Bombay, at Calcutta. Princess Caroline, Camelia, from Hamburgh, at River Plate. Iris, , from Charleston, at the Clyde. King William, ---, hence, at Dublin. Huddersfield, Noakes, hence and Rio, at Bombay. Scylla, Scott, hence for Rio Janeiro, at Falmouth. Eliza, Gowland, from Gallipoli, at do. Lavinia, Jones, hence for N ew Orleans, at Falmouth, with foremast, top gallant-mast, yards, sails, &e. carried away. William Nicol, , from Clyde at Bombay, 7th Dec. Theodosia, Coleman, hence, at ditto, 15th Dec, Medora, Dixon, hence, at ditto, 17th Dec. Arethusa, Shn2, from Zante for Falmouth, off Gibraltar. Greyhound. Reait, from Yarmouth for this port, at Falmouth. Kingston, Dixon, hence for Africa, was totally lost 24th Jan. off Cape Palmas; crew saved. Crown, Porisonby, hence for Calcutta, and the Magistrate, Taylor. hence for Mobile, were spoken Bth inst. in lat. 50, lon. 7 ; the former with loss of fore topmast yard, and the latter with loss of jib-boom, The Isabella, - hence for Calcutta, was spoken 23d Nov. in thc Bay of Bengal, by the'Broxbornebury, arrived at Calcutta. The Boyne, Forster, from Monte Video at this port, sailed 6th Jan. Left the Ayr, loading for London, and Favourite, for this port. In lat. 10. S. spoke the Carraboo, -, hence for Buenos Ayres. WEDNESDAY, Arm I3.—Noon, Wind W.—Fresh. AnnivED—lsabella, spence, from Savannah—Portenia, Bleasdale, from Laguna, sailed 25th Feb.—Cecilia, Bay, from Copenhagen, Diana, Hawkins, hence, at Calcutta, 17th Dec. Alexander, Ramsay, from New South Wales, at ditto. Collingwood, Hookey, from China, at ditto, 19th. Annar.dale, Hill, from Bombay, at Madras. Elizabeth. , sailed from Calcutta for this port, the 15th Dec. Rapid, Robertson, hence, at Beyrout. Eliza Saunders, Bailey, hence, at• Constantinople. Tuscan, Way, and Livorna, Cooper, hence, at Leghorn. Mary, Bale, hence, at Smyrna. Salus, Crickmay, hence, at Syra. Helena, Greeven, from Dort, at Cowes 9th inst. and sailed 10th for this port. Convivial, Hampton, from Galipoli at Falmouth, 7th inst. and sailed for this port, 10th inst. The Sophia, APNair, from Canton, off the Wight. The Sir Howard Douglas, Hunter; & Dowson, Boyes, for Quebec, have put back. The Mary Ann Webb, Lloyd, sailed from Cowes for Calcutta, 10th instant. The Wilhelmina Magdalena, Leip, hence for Revel, was stranded 19th instant, on Gothland—crew and part of the cargo saved. The Matilda, Rowe, hence for Calcutta, was spoken 22d Feb. in lat. 23 30 S, long. 25 50 W. The Secret, Hocquard, hence for Lima, was spoken 9th inst. about 60 miles south of Cape Clear. The Portenia, Bleasdale, from Laguna at this port, sailed 25th Feb. in company with the Euphemia, for Cork. On the 11th instant saw her off Cove. Left the Skeen loading for this port, to sail in about three weeks. On the 11th instant, off Cape Clear, spoke the Mill man, hence for Quebec. THURSDAY, APRIL 14.—Wind N.W.—Light. ARRIVED—The Superb, Cook, from Jamaica, sailed 29th Feb.—The Princess Victoria, Paul, from New Orleans—Barbadian, —, from Barbados, sailed 9th March—Good Intent, Silk, from Aveiro—Cecilia, Day, from Copenhagen—Velocity, —, from Bremen—St Andrew, Thompson, from New York, sailed 25th March—Martha, , from Africa—Algonquin, Murckin, from Philadelphia—Eliza, Nowland, from Gallipoli and Falmouth. SAILED—The Baboo, Brock, for Calcutta—Pacific, Hoxie, for New York—Sophia, Itysselm, for Narva. The John Knox, Thompson ; Edinburgh, itl'Lay ; & Robert Burns, Messenger, hence, at Savannah. Merchant, Meldrum, hence, at Mobile. The Northumberland, Ormerod ; Birkby, Johnson ; and the Mary, Morton, hence, at New Orleans. The Virginian, Harris; and Jane, M'Leod, hence, at New York. Euphernia, Scott, from Laguira, at Cork. Barbados, Rea; and Atlas, Jones, hence, at Cork. Liverpool, Meyler ; and Little Penn, Corkhill, hence, at Waterford. Governor Troup, Smith, hence, at New York. The Minx, Morrison ; and the Lee, Braithwaite, hence, at Barbados. Bradshaw, Milroy l; and the Colchester, M'Lean, hence, at Mobile. The Charlotte, Sloan, hence for Quebec, was spoken 10th March, in lat. 48 47, long. 13 15. The Jubilee, Watson, hence, at New York, 24th March. The Albion, -, hence for Savannah, was spoken 13th March, in lat. 26 35, long. 2620. The Morea, -, from Matanzas for St Petersburgh, was spoken in lat. 37, long. 69. The Harmony, Douglas; and the Lively, Spital, from St Domingo, at Antwerp. The Dependent, Simpson, hence for Philadelphia, was spoken in lat. 46, on the Ist instant. The Tecumseh, Seydam, which sailed 10th instant, for New York, has put back, having been in contact with the Mayflower, hence for Exeter 12th instant, off Bardsey. TELEGRAPH OFFICE, APRIL 14, 1636. Wind at Holyhead West.—Blowing fresh. Off Holyhead, inward-bound—No. 1125, The Gipsy, (steamer) from Waterford, at 2 30 p.m. Off Great Ormshead, inward-bound—No. 162, the Albion, B S, from Bombay. at 1 p.m. A Ship and Barque off the Ormshead, outward-bound, in tow by steamers, at 3 30 p.m. LIVERPOOL TIDE TABLE. Festiralz,4c. _ • APRIL. 11. Tuesday —.12 851 Wednesday 13 944 Thursday l4 10 27 Friday, l5 11 2 Saturday 16 11 37 SUNDAY l7 Monday lB 023 H. M. F. I. 919 14 1 10 8 15 7 10 15 17 2 11 20 17 11 11 53 18 5 0 8 18 3 039 17 9 Venus rises 6h 22m morn Ox. 8c Cam. Terms begins Jupiter sets lh 38m morn Easter Term begins Mars rises 4h 26in morn 2d Sunday after Easter Venus sets I lh 30m ON en itlathrts. LIVERPOOL COTTON MARKET, APRIL 14. Since Tuesday there has been an improved demand, particularly to day, and about 8,000 bales have been sold., our market on the whole closing rather higher. 2,000 bales on speculation. XCHANGE, APRIL 14. OATs, clff 451 b. 8 d 8 d Irish, n. kilndried 2 10 0 3 0 Do. old do. Do. prime, 421 b Do, do. old 0 0.. 0 0 Foreign, free Do. it bond PgAsg, .g• imp. qr English, white Foreign, white BizAti . ,..4r imp. qr. English, new 39 0.. 44 0 Do. Pigeon, old 0 0 .. 0 0 Foreign, free Do. in bond 0 0 .. 0 0 Irish, Tick,c. new 35 6 .. 37 6 Do. 01d..... ... . 0 0.. 0 0 MALT, W imp. qr. Englisb INDIAN CORN, im . qr. Red White F couß,.4? 2801 b. _ _ _ English, fine 0 0 .. 0 0 Irish, 2ds, new 3l 0 .. 35 6 Do. fine . American. sweet, per brl. free 0 0.. 0 0 Do. in bond 0 0.. 0 0 Do. sour, free 0 0.. 0 0 Do. in bond Canadian, free Do. in bond 0 0.. 0 0 OATMEAL, 4r 240th English, new .... 0 0 0 0 Irish, new Do. old „, 0 0 .. 0 0 BRAN, 41" 241 b 0 11 .. 1 2 RAL MARKET, APRIL 14, s, d. s. d. , Potatoes 2 3q2 scri , 90Th Cattle Potatoes 1 7 1 10 - Turnips 30 032 Operton Carrots 4O 045 0 Manglewurzle26 028 0 ...-_ Manur , .‘ .... . 6 0 8 0 - LIVERPOOL CORN E WHEAT, 4if 701 b. s d s d English, new red, 7 2 7 7 Do'. old 0 0.. 0 0 Do. new white Do. old 0 0.. 0 0 Scotch, white 0 0 0 0 Do. red Irish, new red 7 0 Do. old 6 2 .. 6 1 .. 6 10 Do. new white Do. old 0 0 .. 0 0 Dantzig, red 0 0 0 0 Do, white Stettin, red 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. white 0 0.. 0 0 Conigsherg, red 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. white Riga& Petersburg 0 0.. 0 0 Odessa Russian, hard 0 0 .. 0 0 Canada, red 0 0.. 0 0 Do. white Bonded Wheat RYE,imp. 'qr. English and Foreign, free 0 0.. 0 0 Do: in bond 0 0 .. 0 0 BARLEY, 49 imp, qr. English, Malting 32 0 .. 36 0 Do. Orindiug,6otb 3 8.. 311 Irish, Malting, do. 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. Grinding, do. 3 9 .. 4 0 Foreign, d. p. do. 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. in bond 0 0.. 0 0 OATS, 41 3 ' 45th. English, new Do. old 0 0.. 0 0 Scotch, &c new.. 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. old 0 0.. 0 0 LIVERPOOL AGRICULTU 5. d. S. d. Hay New Hay 0 8 0 11 - Clover Hay 0 8 0 9 -- Straw, Wheat 0 5 0 6 -- Straw, Oat 0 4 0 5 - Green Clover 0 0 0 0 - LIVERPOOL NEW - CATTLE MARKET APRIL 11. There was a good supply of both Beasts and 'Sheep in the market to-iay. The. sale for Beasts was dull, but Sheep were all sold off in the early part of the day. Price of Beasts from sid to bid, and Sheep from 61d to per lb. PRICE OF BULLION IN LONDON. PER OUNCE. XSD 4SD Foreign Gold in Bars New Dollars ^ Silver in Bars, (Standard) 0 5 0— 0 5 0 New Doübloons Arnit 15. 1836, PRICES OF SHARES, LIVERPOOL, APRIL 14, 1836. Liverpool Co, as lAriro Liverpool New G as an d C oke Company, .....ZlOO • .... . l7O 0 0 New Shares, premium £so Liverpool and Harrington Water Works Bootle ditto Exchange Buildings 168 0 0 Liverpool and Manchester Railway, ,£lOO paid 285 0 0 Ditto Old Quarters 25 —6— 71 10 0 Ditto New Quarters Bolton and Leigh ditto Ditto 25 22 10 0 Warrington and Newton ditto - 168 0 0 ICenyon and Leigh ditto - 110 0 0 Wigan Branch ditto Preston and Wigan North Union Line ditto 5O ..--• 70 0 0 St. Helens and Runcorn Gap ditto • 100 --- 35 0 0 Leicester and Swannington ditto 5O 60 0 0 Manchester,Bolton, anclßury Railway and Canal 48 85 0 0 Leeds and Selby Railway Grand Junction ditto 4O 116 10 0 London and Birmingham ditto 5 0 ---- 126 0 0 Birmingham and Gloucester ditto 5 14 10 0 Manchester and Leeds ditto . 5 23 0 0 North Midland ditto 5 16 0 0 Midland ditto 3 ..-- 11 11 0 Edinburgh and Glasgow ditto - 7 0 0 Edinburgh, Leith and Newhaven... London and Gravesend ditto 1 --- 110 0 Bank of Liverpool...... lO 27 0 0 Bank of Manchester 25 37 0 0 Manchester and Liverpool District Bank l5 -- 22 0 0 Commercial Bank of Liverpool.... lO 24 0 d Liverpool Marine Assurance Company 25 -- 14 15 0 Oldham Gas Light and Waterworks lO 20 10 a slanchester Fire and Life Assurance Co lO .---- 10 0 Cr Ocean Assurance Company Northern and Central Bank of England lO --- 16 10 0 Union Bank of Liverpool - 18 5 0 Commercial Bank of England 3 -- 7 5 0 Birkenhead Ferry 0 -- 0 0 0 Tradesmens' Bank 2 10s--- 4 3 0 RICHARD DAWSON. Share Broker. ERPOOL INFIRMARY REPORT, From the ith to the 14th April, 1836. DIBCHARGED. In-patients cured Relieved and at own request 7 Made Out-patients Irregular Dead ADUITTED. In-patients Out-patients Casual during zl. P. ...,. the last week S O.P 0 Remain in the house l2B House Visitors—Mr. Alison and Mr. Irving. Consulting Surgeon, Mr. Forshaw. Chaplain, the Rev. It. Davies.—House Surgeon, MT. I. Ashcroft. LOCK HOSPITAL. Admitted Bln the Hospital 48 I Discharged, lO LONDON GAZETTE.-TUESDAY, APRIL WHITEHALL, APRIL 12. The King has been pleased to direct letters patent to be passed un der the Great seal of that part of the United Kingdom of Great Bri tain and Ireland called Ireland, granting to the Right Hon. Dominick Browne, and to the heirs male of his body lawfully begotten the dig nity of a Baron of that part of the said United Kingdom called Ire land, by the name, style, and title, of Baron Oranmore and Browne, of Carra Browne Castle, in Oranmore, in the county of Galway, and of Castle Macgarrett, in the county of Mayo. DOWNING-SREET, APRIL 11. The King has been graciously pleased to appoint Rear-Admiral Patrick Campbell, Companion of the Most Honourable Military Order of the Bath, to be a Knight Commander of the said Order, in the room of Vice-Admiral Sir Graham Moore. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY. Samuel Hibbert and George Hibbert, Draycott, Derbyshire, cotton. doublers. BANKRUPTS. Joseph Cox, Bradford, Yorkshire, draper. John Williams, Strand, London, tailor. Peter Green, Stamford-street, Blackfriars, Surrey, agent. Charles Rickaby, Chalcroft-terrace, New-cut, Lambeth, gurTeit auetioneer. Thomas Cunnington Matheson, Mansell-street, Minories, London, ship-owner. Edwin Smith, Rochester, linen-draper. Charles Orrah, Huddersfield, Yorkshire, draper. Charles Martin and Benjamin Ware, Great Tower-street, London, wholesale cheesemongers. Charles Walker, Halkin Wharf, Lower Belgrave-place, Middlesex, wharfinger. Arthur Fry, Blackfriars-road, and Hereford-place, Commercial. road, London, hat-manufacturer. John Heap, Manchester, builder. Ambrose Gallimore, Stone, Staffordshire, printer. Sarah Belcher, Doncaster, innkeeper. DIVIDENDS. May 10, G. Goulden, Liverpool, wine and spirit dealer, at two, St the Clarendon Rooms, Liverpool—May 7, G. Maggs, Bristol, linen" draper—May 3, E. Baugh, Sloane-street, Ch e l sea , draper—May 3, We Mill, Fore-street, London,woollen-draper—May 3, C. T. Kirby,Craw. ford-street, Portman-square,London, laceman—May4, Sir G.Duckettg Bart., Sir F. B. Morland, Bart., and T.T. Bernard, Pall-mall, London. bankers--May 4, J. Wilkinson, J. Staith, and R. J. T. Perkin, Lea' denhall-street, London, brokers—May 4, .1. Robinson, Birming lY hanit Warwickshire, jobbing smith—May 3, T. Dalton, Birmingham,ar wickshire, m erc h an t—M ay 3 , R. Belt, Neweastle-upon-Tyne, Nor' M thumberland, merchant — a y 9, R. Jackson, Newcastle-upon-Tyne , Northumberland, grocer—May 4, G. Hocknell, Stone, Staffordshire. innkeeper—Mav 10, M. Dunn, Preston, Lancashire, wine-merchant —May 6, J. Fisher, Great Bridge, Staffordshire, iron-merchant. CERTIFICATES To be granted, unless cause be shown to the contrary on or before the 3d dav of May. W. and C. Beaumont, Ember Mills, Thames Ditton, Surrey, miller s —J. Puddicombo, Dartmouth, Devonshire, surgeon. LIVERPOOL BANKRUPT BUSINESS. FRIDAY, APRIL 15. 110171 1, JOHN MOTTERSHEAD, shipwright, special meeting, at slr. Leather's Office, at the Clarendon-buildings, 12 TUESDAY, APRIL 19. Josern DAWSON, scrivener, deceased, proof of a debt and final dividend at Messrs. Leigh and Sanders' Office, Basnett street, at WEDNESDAY, APRIL 20. WILLIAM SMITH, butcher, first meeting, at the Clarendon rooms, at 1 THURSDAY, MARCH 21. JOHN Fox, wine -merchant, audit and proof of debts, at the Clarendon-rooms,at ll Final dividend, at MARRIED. On the 20th February last, in Barbadoes, W. Fitzherbert, Esq. sciri of Sir 11. Fitzherbert, to Annie, daughter of Sir R. Alleyne. Lately, in this town, Mr. John Richardson, tailor, Lord-street, tO Miss Margaret Cubbin. On Saturday, the 26th ult. at Trinity Church, Chester, R. Loire/ M.A. Fellow of Ma g d a l en College, Oxford, to Georgiana, secon " daughter of the late George Orred, Esq. of Aigburth, near this two' On Wednesday, the 30th ult. at St. David's Church, Mr. Edvrar, Hughes, merchant, to M argaret, th i rd daughter of the late Richard J• Lockett, Esq. On Sunday, the 3d inst. at St. Philip's Church Mr. William Foal of the I 0, to Margaret, third daughter of Captain Joseph Russel e ° Kincardine. On Monday, the 4th inst. at St. Peter's Church, John Whittingba o4 Esq. to Emma, eldest daughter of James Brade, Esq. of Wavertree. Same day, at N ew B r i g h ton, Cheshire, L. S. Thompson, Esq. tO Martha, eldest daughter of John Bragg, Esq. shipowner. On Tuesday, the sth inst. at Frodsham, Captain H. Webb, of tiff Mary Ridgway, to Eliza, youngest daughter of Mr. William Grice, Frodsham. Same day, at Northumberland -house, by the Bishop of Carlisle, Rev. Edward Th ompson, cous i n of the Earl of Lonsdale, to glib Ellen Percy, fifth daughter of the Bishop of Carlisle. On Wednesday, the 6th inst. at Bride's Church, Capt. John Dictity son, of Maryport, to Miss Mary Brown, of this town. Same day, at St. David's Church, Mr. J. Rice Hayward, perm , " of this town, to Miss Isabella Price, of Bellefield-house, Derby-rot', On Thursday, th e 7th i ns t. a t Wi gan , M r . J ames Marsh to' 141"- Mary M'Clure, both of that place. Same day, at Ma nc h es t er , R o b er t G arne tt, jun. Esq. of to Ellen Frances, second daughter of Robert Peel Willock, Esq. Greenheys. Same day, at Bury, Mr. Richard Roberts, of this town, brass; founder, to Elizabeth, eldest d aug ht er o f M r . J o h n H eap, M anc hester Same day, at St. Philip's Church, Mr. Edward Cashen to Miss g al garet Johnson. Same day, at St. Anne's Ch u r c h, Mr. Henry Solby Melson, formerlf of Hull, Yorkshire, to Amelia, second daughter of Samuel PheiP Esq. of this town. On Saturday last, at St. Nicholas's Church, hy the Rev. M. Peg: trey, Mr. Thomas Ibbeson, of the Golden Ball, Wood-street, to Elizabeth Rossall, of Kirkham, Fylde. On Monday last, at Present Church, Mr. Peter Naylor, of Rain to Ann, eldest daughter of Mr. Thomas Atherton, of Whiston. On Wednesday last, at St. Nicholas's Church, Mr. Thoi. Parkintgo joiner and cabinet-maker, of this town, to Catherine, second dal*" of the late Mr. S. Harding, Chester. Same day, at the Collegiate Church, Manchester, Mr. Ric,b,, a p t, la Hughes, of that town, to Sophia, relict of the late Richard Welk e f' Collyhurst, near Manchester. Same day, at St. George's Church, E ve rto n , J ames Long, Escl•tsegai.t geon, of this town, to Mary, e ld es t d aug ht er o f Alexander vans, Kingston, Jamaica. , DIED. On the 23d January, at Montego Bay, Jamaica, aged 22, Marna*ano Burrow, son of Mr. John Burrow, of Lancaster. 4•4 ' On Wednesday the 25d ult., aged 25, George, son of Mr. 0. l iVO ° Smithdown-lane. an' On Friday the 25th ult., aged 76, Mr. Thomas Howard, Thin e street East; deservedly respected. 11. On Ilrednesday the 80th ult., aged 43, Mr. John Quin, painter , per Frederick-street. Same day., at Davenham-hall, Cheshire, Miss Rankin, a 9.13e4te christian and an ornament of private life. On Thursday the 31st ult., at Waterloo, Elizabeth, daughter of late Rev. William HassaU, Rochdale. fu jet At Derby, Harriet, widow of the late Lieut. Colonel Robert and daughter of the late Lieut. Colonel Philip Bainbrigge. e tr e On Saturday the gd inst., Mr. George Evans, broker, Duke- 0 aged 55. pb On Sunday the 3d inst , at Over Tabley-hall, near Jo b Carter, Esq., aged 76. WO' On Thursday the 7th inst., at the Exchequer-office,Whiteww, Godwin, Esq., in the 81st year of his age. Same day, at Kirkham, aged 77, Mrs. Margaret Birley. On Friday last, in Great Newton-street, deeply regretted, ... wife of Mr. Richard Miles, aged 49. St' ESq Same day, in the 65th y ear o f hi s age, James Liolme, " George's-place, Everton. Same day, Gilbert, infant son of Mr. Whitley, solicitor. - 1 1 6 c0 Same day, aged 13 wee k s , 'Fl etc h er B evan, e i g h t h son o f the' `- James Hayes, of Wynbunbury, near Nantwich. Same day, aged 53 years, Mr. John Cunningham, of Warring t ys. On Saturday last, Mr. Richard Scott, of Blake-street, aged 46 Ed ye s r On Monday last, a t B rereton R ectory, Ch es hi re, t h e Rev. - Royds, A.M., rector of that parish. Same day, aged 64, Mr. Edward Spencer, Duke-street, for t h e 38 years was a master'cooper in this town. el° On Wednesday last, at her son's house, in Crown-street, - theritte Hughes, aged Efil years. , iste ° Same day, Mr. Richard Taylor, plasterer, Renshaw -street Sye'rsee,tE' aged vert 0 5 n 9 . . Yesterday, after a v e ry sh or t ill ness , M argar et, reli c t of the late LIVEOOL: PRINTED AND ' PUBLISHED isllo' EVERY TUESDAY AND FRIDAY MOJ BY RICHARD TATTISSON, At No. 4, NORTH CRESCENT, CASTLE-STREET. P",, Orders and Advertisements are received by Messrs. Nelr'fbroni Co., Warwick-square; Barker, Fleet-street; Deacon, " 8 jos e k Reynell, Chancery-lane; Lawson & Barker, Birchin-1anei,,,.1,„, Thomas, 1, Fineh-lane, Cornhill; Munden Hammond , 21 , 4 Oa:: bard-street ; Mitchell, 8, Red Lion-Court, Pleet-street ;. raway's; at the London Commercial Coffee-mouse, MincinNowe, at the Jerusalem Coffee-house, Cornhill ; Chavter Pater-noster-row; and North-a nd'SOuth American Co,nS o r;" 1 01 Threadneedle-street, London; by. Messrs. Johnston ant , e it, lin; Mr. M'Phun, Glasgow; Mr. Wheeler, Exchange-4%100.e, Mr. Lewis, Market-street, Manchester; Mr. Malley, 13 j, COMS Warrington ; Mr. Clarke, Pilot-otliee, Preston ; 33, Union-street, Birmingham ;.Clarke and Lewis, 4,. 11 "' Threadneedle-street, London. .L ±~',~' I COI of the EAI rea Ve; ...... Dc P` Rll4 tied