The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1836-10-28 00:00:00

-8:16. . lONS'. an indict- 0 one teyn he priVlLir on similar transpor- ;:b, the pro ,ty of Win. Dutch. It o g,o to the some par hile he pre lie watch, a 'flop of the I the win tap out of examine. id the pri assed sea- stolen one I . Maurice in Liver irisoner to ® and the 2.. prisoner fur twelve rer watch, irusecutur went out Here be policeman building Lit he had He gave ,The watch in The jury been eni ot would said that yet he o his own the testi x o'clock iut make isoner in ':ter. As recorder ie month charged lis Fern e; Mrs. Lucy ball le top of ring the },dud of ,risoner, et. H e her hus vhom he n. The the pri y before It of his :re sent severely Led that gad him asporta- papers d hen and his his ser i place. r of the Lear the stated Lod was follow- d been 1. Air. had similar have it ie pri •der or iterere. he Re pasied 'dieted .rehief Ist the turued s, Sell- 7.. Cri. pri tation !re ut- 'eloni hop of Leiria July, duced le pri , who. hitn (rail" CT. 4 8 is. 6 4 4: The RECORDER summed up the evidenr;e, and at the request of the eourisel fur the prosecution th-e witness from the bank. of Ireland was re-called. He explained that notwithstanding There was the a crd Dublin" upon the counterfeit plate wluch Vas not ui.ou the genuine plate, }et the counterfeit plate iv ant produce an limitation of a gepuiue note. The word " Duuiiu mils printed. with type upon the genuine note. The July found . the prisoner grainy. He was tried - on two other similar Indictments, and sentenced upail . the second indictment to seven sears tr.rnsportation. The court sat again yesterday mottling for a :hort time. The cases, however, possessed little interest, and were merely cases, the particnlars r f which h ave appeared at full length in our police reports. The court, was adjourned at noon, until this fflorninr at nitre o'clock, when the Post-office explosion case mill come un. „,, , • CO OF ASSA.—Tueseev. , i hts court wag URT held in the Nisi Pi GE u s Court, at the Sessions% eouse, before .iVilliatu Wallace Currie, Esq., Mayor, and Charles Crumptuu, Esq., Assessor. Penny v. WILLIAMS. Me RusterON aeared as counsel for the plaintiff, who is a Joiner, carrying on business in Camden-street. Liverpool. He aeught to recover front the defendant, a beershop.keeper, the t s h u t e t zf ei £ o 7 4l l l s t s . . s: l p d. rl , ett for work and m a t er i a l s u s e d in t he fi t ti ng u p The, jury! found a verdict in / favour -of the plaiutiff for the sum claimed. 1:1,1 show V. SCHOLEs. wThis a c ti on Was brought to recover 116Ibs. weight of pork, ad l'Y the plaintiff to the defendant. Th e ques ti on in dispute, whether the price agreed upou was 4d. or sid. a lb. The J u ry returned a verdict for the* plaintiff for £2 3s. rid. LuSSELI. v. HiLAIIINGWAY. An undef en d e d action on a bill of exchange. Verdict for the Plaintiff £l'ol o3. W R oot.nIGHT AND ANOTHER V. AWLINS. etMr. VEISABLES appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Colrtee for th e defendant The action was brought:by Messrs. 'he !right a n d C h i dson,•silk ineicers, of 80ld -street, against d efendant, a gentleman residing in Liverpool,. to recover payment for certain articles furnished for the defendant's father's 1 thee namet funeral. Th e order was given by Mr. Rankin, in March, 1831, late Mr. Rawlins. There s no evidence to p rove i h at the defen h dant was an executor of father, a of) t h li e e execut o is o f ti le plaintiffs consented to be nensuited. AI AssAULT BY A POLICE INSPECTO4.—SMITH V. LYONS. Mr. EIENDERsON d the leadins. The action was brought by the planniff (welle p tu recover damages from the defendant an en assault committed by him upon the plaintiff's wife. he "vine seized her, and dragged her along the streets to Bride- Mr.well, Vesieeees stated the plaintiff's case. The plaintiff kept ~eo.ok shop in the neighbourhood of the theatre. On the 15th iior fa.sornolooautothedhe j u o • n e e n s t , o a ti o t d s7 carry souse supper to the house of p ? '"' e a tr o l' o irn ( a . ce :N a y d h o i l i g e she was ' :t i a s ul i ic e g wtehuetrewtihtenditeofetohiebtsotrteoeitmtoe to the evidence of a witness named Mullin, Private watchmen.) said to her, "You will know me when you t e , e o e a leagaie. ,, a Mrs. Smith said, "I have known you before.” n u fur th e the w rs hib LYone denied the assertion, which she reiterated, and ,defendant then said, " I will make you madain keep better r.i,:itel.ik,,e." future ;" to which she rejoined, "You can do as Lyons to this answered, " Will you be insolent ma h_ ..? and on her saying that she had usd any insolence, 4:i(liti, threatened to take her to Bridewell; ;and s she immediately ' You dare not." Lyons then crossed the.street, and talc aw hold of her, pushed her before him to Bridewell, where she a a n ch t tt s g o s u was decd all night, and discharged at the Police-office in the Cluefreni" the e t to g. • It was fur this assault and imprisonment that the recover damages. 1115 1 : l c: l e e Learned ASSESSOIi - said, that under the present form of too M o r. plaintiff could not recover damages for any e n ,J_ l trY done to the wife • he could only recover mere nominal 'flees for the loss of ' her services during the time she was imprisoned. -. 14 (Attala, the defendant's counsel, consented to the . e atuent .Tea, the 'record, and it was accordingly altered so as "Inake the plaintiff and his wife jointly interested in the issue. w•Gt eke Grieves, a bridewell turnkey, (one of the plaintiff's thieniesses d 5 is ) -Inner' that on the night of the 14th, or morning of 13 • -I " of September',Smith was brought to the Town aordideivell by anspector Lyons. She passed the night there, peigieoet.oon.bed. - 'e h _ was ac commodated with the best room in the building, . to ere were no other prisoners in the room. Urs. Smith refused Next morning witness walked with her to the ei._, 'nee; she followed the rest of the prisoners. She was ,w,etenarged at lialf-past eleven o'clock. The charge against her , 5 be ing disorderly in Marble-street, Whitechapel, at two cnclock i n the morning. In answer to a question from the urt, the w i tness said that Lyons appeared to support his "arge at th e Police-office the next day. The case was fully goue into. iiipliain IV, client Mr. Rust -11'0N on behalf of the defendant, submitted that his ler i l was justified under the provisions of the sth and of in the conduct he had pursued towards the slain ke . w ife. The 51st section of that act provides that persons h our of ceok-shops should not have their shops open after the ee ., t midnight, Or before five o'clock in the morning. The `ht section gave constables the power of apprehending tran- Prilit'offenders using obScene, abusive, or indecent language, teertsens carrying ee vided they-did not know the parties. And by the 77th sec . tnotiri" in ' . '_ l l of the same act, it was enacted that all actions against the provisions of the act into execution, should the. county,. and that notice should be given one t . , th before the action was brought. In support of this posi t,''' he quoted the cose of Theobael v. Crickinore, reported in p eriod 911 could not be eeltl'newell and Alderson, page 227, in which it was held that an brought against a constable after a given . for breaking open the front door of a house, in order to fines distress warrant. The learned counsel also relied r °l 1 the case of Bareuger and Penis, Ist vol. Meeson and l e : l e s bY, Page 208. urned a s . . A• the ssessott considered that this was a case to go to the Jury, . Nlr le,. •• Rest-tanN then said that if that was the opinion of the ,b Be . sebsoi, it would becomehisduty 1,, rvatious to the jury, wile ivoUld bear in mind the fact of i e te r uns keeping cook-shops being prohibited front .keeping T 1 ,, i . 1 houses . open aftt4 - the hour ofetwelve o'clock at night. we:a plaintiffs were clearly acting, at the time ehe assault atecominiited, lit open vi o l a ti on of that rule. Should they be llleion th a t the inspector had acted in a manner unauthor s. Y the act, ehey would not forget that he had acted with s e in e g,niar care towards Mrs.. Smith, he having provided fur her , 11 9est accommodation which the place afforded. In con e.eit,'s'°n. the learned counsel said that while the town council I I „ resolved to enforce the laws for the protection of the pub :t? v e ace of the town, and to defend their officers in the execu mill of their duty they were determined nut to defend those T i er 8 if hey exceede'd the bounds of their authority, of'V'YENABLES' elainaing his right to reply, in consequence t- :;: i ef e ‘ nd' r sCounCil having prodaced the Bridewell journal a lO n :.;:nee, a c n un 6 tended that the defendants had not made out an d as er to the case. Mrs. Smith . was not unknown to him, NH 8 regarded the cook-shop, if any offence had been corn the e,soi!.. food I, ri el l , the husband was the responsible party, and might have (t e h e- 1 B 'lltlnOned before 'the magistrates the next day ; but he scie ft e"rned counsel) had Nato learn that it was an offence to_ at * any hour of the night or day, the intention of - Pro i ';'' being the prevention of the practice of harbouring un tie) br eh aracterrapcin the preneises, and so long as persons were e .: B affered to enter or be served on the premises, no offence B,etttutntnitted. With regard to the question whether Mrs. (s t a y " had acted in a disor r derly manner in the street, he had called to ask the jitry was she disorderly ? if so, why not have hi s ed the policeman who ' came up when the defendant, struck ,ii_ostiek On the pavement. 11 it was proved that she had been but ilerly t he was content to let the defendant have the verdict; the 1 i tbe jury were convinced that she was not, he hoped the e e i v Ptaintiffs 'would have the benefit of that decision, and 'T ie: er thee hands of the jury compensation in damages for the 41`,!,Y defendant had inflicted upon them. iri.t",° Learned ASsESSOR summed up . the evidence, declar auth:t the defendant was not justified in his conduct by any a lli ent r UY given him under the provisions of the act of pasha le, 119‘der which he had received his appointment. "Jury returued a verdict for the plaintiffs. Damages £5. Thi s The . . bleu:eget. v. pool,E. 4 iitl, d L . '' , an action to recover damages for an assault com tiff, 'V the defendant ; an inspector of police, upon the plain- Mr, v was a "alesi.es, the plaintiff's counsel ; stated that his client ei,ertirTost respectable man, a native el Ireland, who had i been /4, WI assaulted by the defendant, an inspector o police, hieesert, nut aear to defend the action, but , contented 4 Pl,e4 r e wl tn Pleadin , e the general issue. The peamtiff, it would %era 1 the evidence, had been requested to serve a copy of a hie s `11)°,1 at d e f en d ant, and for that purpose ha d wa i te d upon 'atlietJ,tho police o ffi ce. T he plaintiff served the writ in a l'eorle-"" se cret manner, and did not say anythinglo the de salt tht talculated to give bins offence. However, the defend - e.ke ete rght proper to push him against the wall, and finally , d se °dal with reat force from the office. aolifei;`Pue Robinso g n deposed that he was an extra officer at St. th e pier;' '' ar ket. In the latter end at September witness saw laid tiff and defendant at the police office. , The defendant Ihro u ',;', l , (l of the plaintiff with one hand and forced him violently Nak ed " the door of -the office with the other. The plaintiff was fu f tei out of, the room. The defendant is about five feet eight °t' mange; The Plaintiff "is a weak, sickly, gentlemanly sort t:ltotot"n every respect." Ile had heen employed in the Ployeetleleouse some years ago, and since that time had em \yet (4 hneself as a collector of rents, and occasionally serving °file: , llle assault was cominitted at the back of the police Tee ti4e presence of Mr. Hall, the magistrate. ili otherwitnesses were called, but they did not appear. • Ilen e : 4ssessou sunmed up observing' that there - was uo eel- Prov e - , °F . the plaintiff - havit: , * given the defendant .the least T he ante s , Jury found for the plaintiff, datnages forty shillings. Thi s DEB:TEAM C. KENYON. t° Ver ti an action . brought by a solicitor in London to re 4efetee W as sum of £2l, the amount of monies recaived by the tt s , ~, I nt, a e e e I . , „.., t , 0 , lb, i ... p , eeper or pool,' in the name and for the. este r *.P i alntiff. -The defendant had been employed by Mr. elin th e ' of Manchester to serve a writ issued by the plaintiff, be name of a cliel'it, against a clergyman of this county. efeto,"olllan immediately paid the debt and costs, but the egilmr,,,,,...lhieitatn.teegdleacse:aclettiot. pay the same over to the parties for teitwie esorriteailam submitted the action could not be main 0111.11.._,,,osatserit whot)tig ought to 1 o h y a e w a e t been d b fe r o o d u : e o h t t , e o i r th th e e r i i n )la t i h n e tiff n a i tn ti et he 'gillat suit- The Plaintiff wasenonsuited. Mr. ;ENABLES , ' A" """ ' n e o v s e e d r :. T e o; o t t the i‘i defendants tce on a n t o affidavit be discharged , 10, i i i :. h SPEED. Z li t , o - f custody or th sti a ted that he WilS arrestedtobteh• him against the ee ° „ r oing, when proceeding t this et h c e su o' r ffi t (-;'7irattto the sergeant an ' s e ;`, ln io n ne hrought by plaintiff, entered these Learned Aam T he _,. ssEsso c n t. said, that the law pr def en ,ittlesses when atten leg oteeted suitors courts of justice, and ordered the oa.ct to be forthwtth discharged. WEDNESDAY _ . 1,, . EIUTCHINSON V. WCORMICK. • r oute ln S WaB an action brought to recover the sum of £45, bor trd Itv a former partner of the defendant, wh o is an excava -141! f, l'? the plaintiff for the purpos e of paying wages. A kie s,?fl of the name of Stephenson, the . former partner of M Tor evid7, was the principal evidence against the defendant. The li u , i ' l lee of this witness was severely commented on bv Mr. t c.','"n, whn appeared for the defendant, and he was sublected anCrst searching cross-examination. It ‘ appeared. that Stephen kso ?ud tined in - partnership with Al Col - wick, and had taken he the concern - that they had afterwards quarrelled, and of d obtained back' £6O out of the LSO. and on a settlement t o V Part nership acc o unts by arbitration he had h a d awarded lenteTThe witnedi, in his cross:examination, repre- It, h Intaselt as a gentle man living on his own independence. ~,a owever, turned 'out that he had been living on the £l5O .4 t. Q t rde t d l '" h • th t he - had been insolvent, and had only just !lo os e:[ of twii!at th a n learned counsel termed) " ins country T he 'the I3oionoli Gaol." t hotwh 44,..ssRsson's, • summing up, said he was afraid that, i.ettw,;::•,llll.iefStoty rested in ntirel , on the credibility of Stephen „ eq h,.'tePhenson entirely a p ) attner - Jf 11`Corinick, had bor.. v,"Y1i0 , ,, t ,, -18,,,tn_olley, rep't:‘,eilting that it was for partnership L 'rtate4— t'h iti-u rlnickinti s t pay it. though Stephenson ha 9.altry' - rpo s .. e, mi)nev (which was 'what was alleged) to his o rn "euri 7; l oecau . se a 'per- n hid a right in such a case to the, ` 10 1 1 •, - , t ;? of both partn - ers s , o and ' Stephenson by his insolvency was T he . Jury found for the plaintiff, damages £45, wyaer the point • O. kw as laid by the Assessor, not placing the slightest credence on .ttic.c44idetitTe. Th . e.AssEssoe said, if he should find he was wrong in point of law, he should allow the defendant to enter a non-suit. rucßua, EXECUTOR, &C., V. MASON, EXECUTRIX, &C. Mr. VENABLES aPpPared for the plaintiff, and stated the case. John TuckPr, the plaintiff, was the executor of John Lutierby, deceased, and the defendant, Jane Mason, WAS the executrix of John Mason, deceased, and the action, was brought against her as such fur goods furnished to her husband during his life time. The plea raised in defence was, that -the administrati ix had not fully administered to the goods and .chat tels which came to her hands. The question to try was, whe ther or nut the defendant had fully administered? He should give prima facie evidence that the deceased Mason had left property to a considerable amount, and amongst the rest one or two pilot-boats. It would be for the defendant to show that she had not fully administered. The amount sought fur was £l5. Its. 9d. Mr. COTTING 1-1 AAt appeared for the defence. Mr. John Lease, the collector of the pilot's committee, was called to prove that the deceased pilot Mason had a share iu No. 10 pilot-boat, which share was worth £5O. and had since a share in another boat, the boat being worth £1,200. Ou being cross-examined, the witness'said the deceased Ma son. died very poor. The defendant owed them money, which had become due since her husdand's death. The privilege of the pilot-boat was worth £l,OOO. Mr. David Rowland deposed that the eighth of a pilot-boat, with the privilege, would be worth about £5OO. On bein cross-examined, he sail Vie boat was worth about £BOO, and the privilege £1,600. The eighth of that was £3OO. • Mr. Cottingham called the'son of the defendant to prove that his mother had paid a sum of £65, which more than covered the £5O, value of the boat, which came to her. The ASSESSOR said the question now was, whether this privi lege wits to be taken into account, which was a question of law; and the jury would give a nominal verdict for the sum sought to be recovered, reserving the result for his opinion on the point of law.— 1' erdict accordingly.. YESTERDAY. MC; ROW L. 13LEMEN TSON This was an action brought to recover the sum of £2O, the amount of au attorney's bill, due by the defendant to the plaintiff. Mr.. Murphy appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Venables for the defence. It appeared that the plaintiff was the son-in-law of the defehd ant, having married the defendant's daughter against her fa ther's, consent. The father was in difficulties, and the son-in law, the plaintiff, who was an attorney's. clerk, undertook to rescue him out of his difficulties. as a friendly act, and in order to procure a reco - miliation. This was consented to, and in process of time the defendant got through his diffictilties. The plaintiff then sent him in a bill for his services and legal' charges, amounting to £2O, for what the defendant had under stood' was a friendly act. The defendant would not pay the amount, and the plaintiff then 'brought this action to recover it. The defendant paid £5 inta.court, which he considered a suffi cient compensation for any services the plaintiff had done (din Mr.,Venables for the defence strongly commented on the con duct of the plaintiff, and called a witness named Wild to prove the above facts; the witness, however, - on entering the box, was' taken suddenly ill, and had to be carried out. The ASSESSOR, in consequence, proceeded to charge the jury as the case stood, and they found a verdict for the plaintiff, minus the £5 paid into court, fur the full amount of his claim. SPEED V. LANGFORD Mr. Venables appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Cottingharn for the defendant. The plaintiff claimed a large sum of money for work and la bour done, and for money paid on behalf of the defendant. The defendant_ pleaded the general issue, and that he had paid a great part of the sum owing. Mr. VENABLES, iu opening the case, said that in the year 1835, about the latter end of August, Mr. Langford employed the plaintiff to sell for him certain skins, who was to allow him 12s. a-week for that, and during the time that the plaintiff was the defendant's servant he had paid for the defendant various sums amounting to £250. The present action was brought for time recovery of a balance of this sum, and for the weekly salary from August, 1835. Several witnesses were called to prove the various payments. After some discussion, on the recommendation of the Assessor, the counsel agreed to refer the case and all matters of difference to Mr. Lawrence, for arbitration. BUIETHERTON AND ANOTHF.O. v. DONALDSON. This was an action brought to recover the costs of an action brought to recover an empty barrel which the defendant held belonging to the plaintiff. Mr. Harden appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Venal)les for the defence. Mr. HARDEN, in stating the case, said the circumstances were these :—About fifteen months ago, the plaintiff supplied the de fendant with a small quantity of ale, in a single barrel. The ale was paid for in two or three months, and nothing was said about it; but when the plaintiff sent for the barrel, the defen dant's wife said " No, tell Mr. Bretherton he must send 30s. for bad ale before he gets the cask." A number of demands were made for the cask, but the same answer was invariably returned. At length the plaintiff thought it his duty to proceed against the defendant to recover his cask, and a writ .w as taken out against. the defendant, and the brewer sent along with the attorney's clerk who. was to serve the writ, to show him where defendant lived. On arriving at the defendant's residence, the wile of the defendant, seeing an air of something like law going on, said, on this application before the serving of the writ, " Oh yes, you may have your barrel, it is in - the cellar, take it." They wit the barrel back, but found themselves minus thy expenses of the proceedings they had taken. For the recovery of those ex penses this action had been brought. It was unnecessary to quote authorities to prove that the plaintiff was entitled to the costs which he had been subjected to. He called William Seddon, who proved being in the service of Messrs. Bretherton, that he had left the ale at the defendant's, and had repeatedly applied for the cask, but. had not been able to obtain it. On his cross-examination, he said he got the cask before the writ was served. There was ale in the cask when he got it back. It, was customary to allow the publicins to keep the casks till the ale :was-done. ,Thei e was about eight inches of ale in the cask when he got it away. The cask was worth 78s. David Jones, clerk to plaintiff's solicitoe, deposed. to taking the writ to serve; but got the barrel and did not - serve the writ. Mr. VENABLES addressed the jury for the defence, ana desig nated the action as a most trumpery one, got up to suit the plaintiff's brother, who acted as his solicitor. He called-wit, nesses to prove that the custom was to detain casks even longer than the time which the cask which was the ground of the present action had been detained, and that the cask was half full of ale when it had cone back. The Jury enquired if they could not draw aline between 305., toe price of the ale, and tl e price of the cask ? The ASSESSOR replied that they could nut do this. It would have been much better if the defendant, when he had incurred the cost of the writ, which was only 55., had paid it. -The jury said they were of opinion that the defendant had a right to detain the cask, and found a verdict accordingly for the defendant. The Foreman of the Jury said that, perhaps they would be stepp►ng out of their province to express an vpiniou about the action, but it was very strong. Mr. HARDEN wished to know what it was. Foreman of the Jury.—" That the action is most discredit able." Mr. HARDEN said the verdict was contrary to the evidence and gave notice that he should move fur a new trial. JONES AN-O ANOTHER, V. AULT. Th 4 was an action brought by the plaintiffs Robert Jones & Son, Rose-hill, brewers, for the recovery of a balance of £l5 for ale sold to the defendant, who keeps the Duke's Dock tavern, in June last. The sale and delivery of the ale was proved. The defence set up was that the ale was "pricked," and not fit for use. Witnesses were called to prove this, and also that the ale was good sound ale. The case occupied some time. Mr. COTTINGHAM appeared for the plaintiff, Lid Mr. WIL KINSON for the defendant. The•jury found a verdict for. the plaintiff £l5, as well as £lO paid into court. - TAYLOR V. MARSH This was an action brought to recover a balance of £7 al leged to be due by the defendant to the plaintiff for work done. The plaintiff is a master joiner, and was employed by the de fendant, who is a timber merchant, to build some houses, the defendant finding the wood. The billof the plaintiffs amounted to £3O, but they had received £23 on account, and fur the ba lance the action was brought. The plaintiffs had done the work in a satisfactory manner, and' had been dismissed from their work without any reason stated. At this stage of the proceedings, as soon as Mr. VENA [ILES had opened : the case, an arrangement was come to to refer the matter to the arbitration of one of the jurors. - - - - LATI - I . OM V. BAXTER. M. VENABIES appeared fur the - plaintiff, and Mr. H ARDEN fur the defend a nt. _ _ Mr. VENABCES, in stating the case, said this was an action brought to recover the value of stone damage mule to the plain tiff's cart, by a cart o f the defendant's, through the negligence of her servants. The defendant's servants were driving two carts near Salthouse Dock, 'each having two horses, when one of the defendant's men left the carts, and, in consequence, one of her carts ran against the defendant's cart, and broke the shafts, damaging it to th-e.-antount. of £2 10s. Ou the accident taking place, the sou of the plaintiff went and told the defendant of the accident, and begged her to lend hint a cart until he had got his repaired. She replied, she would not, that it was the act of her servants, and she had nothing to do with it, and that they might do what they pleased with her servants. All the . plaintiff sought for, was the amount of damage which had been done to his cart, and, in point of law, the defendant, Mrs. Baxter, was clearly responsible for the acts of her servants. he called witnesses t o p rov e the amount of damag e , an d th a t th e cart which had run against' the plaintiff's cart, was unattended by any driver. Mr. HARDEN, for the defence, contended that where the in jured party was guilty of "any degree of negligence, an action could not be brought. lie called witnesses to prove that the accident bad occurred as much from the negligence of the plain tiff's carter, as from that of the defendant's. VENABLES replied. The jury found a verdict for the defendant, there being ne gligence nu both sides. ROTHWELL v. THOMPSON. Mr. CoTTINGuast and Mr. WILKINSON appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. HENDERSON for the defence. • The plaintiff in this case is a man of property-at Wigan, and the defendant is a publican in this town. The plaintiff au thorized his son-in-law, who was in indifferent circumstances, to enter into an agreement with the defendant to give up pos session of a public-house in Mersey-street, for which the plaintiff agreed to pay a consideration of £l5O foi the possession and fixtures, possession to be given up in IQ days from the date of the :agreement. The plaintiff performed his part of the contract, but on going to take possession, the landlord, who before had not been mentioned, refused to allow him to take possession, unless he would enter into an avjeeinent to leave the house at at any time, without the usual processor ejectment.' This being quite' foreign to the agreement, the plaintiff refused to acceed to it, and brought the present action to recover £5O which had been paid down when the agreement had been entered into, to wards the fixtures, and for £5O which the defendant a g reed to forfeit it he should not perforni hiS part of the agreement. The parties entered into an arrangement, the deft;ndant to return the £5O which he had received, and £5 towards the costs, to the plaintiff. Verdict accordingly. This concluded the cause list. An inquiry was afterwards heard, and the court then broke up about 6 o'clock. C APTA IN J. E. Go a noN.—Tne marriage between that zealous Protestant patriot J. E. Gordon, Esq., and Miss Smith, niece of Lo r d C arr i ngton, took place in London, on Tu esda y . The _ceremony was performed by an intimate friend o f the p arties, the Rev. E. Bickersteth, rector of Watton, of Worcestershire, and in th e the happy couple anitnated language of Hymen's votaries, %_•%.,ere preparing to leave town to spend the "honey moon. - !. Captain Gordon had only recently returned from attending the andgreat Prcitestant meeting at Heref o rd, where he delivered a Ibug friends congratulating C la a r p d t s at o n f G th o r r e d : n h him, ex . pressed an opinion that he had triumphantly exliausteci.The sobject, "Wait a whiff' , " 'aid speech, o4.r,st hi: s et h i: 6, ,I : e. at , : v l te, h or e ; tt c .o o h feo c i l i u ,: s ..; i el o m :f ‘, % , ::::C ‘, l , l ill s vo e you a much greater treat." Mr I.ll‘Gh e' ieMi'occupi , it up- THE LIVERPOOL STANDARD. TOWN COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS. Council met by adjournment again on 'Wednesday at 12 o'clock, for the consideration of the bye-laws. The TOWN CLERK begged to refer the Council to the class No: 4, of the general bye-laws. Upon the bye-laws relating to tail-boards on carts being fastened to prevent. their rattling. these were two points raised. The first was with regard to brew ers' carts. The Council thought that that not he obviated, that it was au inconvenience which must be endured, and that the substitution of ropes would not tie of much service to the pub•ic, and would inconvenience the brewers. Mr. Councillor EARLE spoke from experience, that there was nothing frightened horses so much as brewers' drays. Any thing beyond a common post-horse took fright at.them. The MAYOR said, perhaps Mr. Harvey, or Mr. Lawrence would invent something to obviate this. . The TowN-cLeRk said, the other reference was with regard to carrying poles in carts. The Council were of opinion that a previous bye law obviated this, in which was the clause, "or by negligence or misbehaviour obstruct any person." Carrying aladdet or pole in such a way would obstruct persons. Mr. Councillor JORDAN said, he had seen many instances of such annoying obstructions. He had the day before seen the parapet cleared by a clod-hopper with a ladder. Mr. Councillor EARLE.—You should have laid an informa tion. The MAYOR.—" That is what is wanted." Mr. Councillor JORDAN.—"The police ought to do that." Mr. Councillor BIRCH.—" Allow me to ask if Mr. Jordan is not on the watch committee." Mr. Councillor JORDAN.-" I am." Mr. Councillor BIRCH.--" Then you had bet►er bring it be , fore the watch committee to instruct the police than bring it be. fore the council." The TowN-cuntx said the nuisance created by the manufac tcre of chickory would be introduced into a bye-law, and with that exception,the general bye-laws were in a condition to be printed for the use of the council. HACKNEY COACHES. Mr. Councillor JORDAN would present a petition .from the hackney coach proprietors. M 4 YOK said it had better he read at the proper time. . . The TOWN-CLERK said, with respect to hackney coaches it had been suggested that the penalties fur not delivering up li cences were too heavy. It had been thought. on reconsidera tion the committee, that they were, and a reduction had been maile There was another suggestion, that hackney coaches should be provided with change in copper. He thought they had no power to order that. According to law a man who had to pay a debt ought to be provided with proper coin in which to pay that debt. (Hear.) The TOWN-CLERK then read the petition from the hackney coach proprietors, which set forth - that the price of hay and corn was very high, _and entreating the council not to reduce the fares owing to the high rates of provender. The petition was signed by seven or eight proprietors of coaches. The TOWN-CLERK said that no reduction had been made. . Mr. Councillor Ilopa rose for the purpose of saying an er roneous impresSion existed amongst proprietors 'of cars, Sce., that they intended to reduce the fares. No such propoiition had been made. In his opinion the fares were too low, and he would take the liberty of proposinz to alter the terms and wake the fare ls. for a car for a short distance, which was now charged Bd. Mr. Councillor EARLE hoped no such reduction would be made, some of the hackney coach proprietors were growing rich on the present fares. The MA - Yon thought they had settled this question before; he thought they should not alter the charge every year if there happened to be a heavy or light winter in the price of pro vender. Mr. Councillor BOLTON thought if they ensured only the le gal fare when sometimes Is. 6d. had been paid for Is., it was in effect reducing the fares. Mr. Alderman ROBINSON said those who had been in the ha bit of giving more than the fare were at liberty to do so still, and most likely would do so. Mr. Councillor BIRCH thought the subject had been very fully discussed, and that there was no necessity to again enter into it. Mr. Councillor LASSELL said that the 8,1. - fares of coaches were hardly ever paid. He had heard one coach proprietor (Mr. Garner) say that he had never received an Bd. fare; he had always Is. given to him. Mr. Councillor IIoPE would press his motion. The TOWN-CLERK said the prayer of the petition was against . any reduction, not for an increase. Mr. Councillor RATHBONE thought they were acting on wrong principle; they ought not to make laws which were in operative ; if the feeling of the public was to pay Is. why ought they not to make it law. Mr. Councillor EARLE thought Bd. was quite enough for one thousand yards. Mr. Alderman BROWN said that there were persons to whom the 4d. was an object, and who only paid the legal fare. The TOWN-CLERK said the law was to favour those who could not pay mete. Mr. Councillor HOPE would propose that the lowest charges for both cars and coaches be struck out. That' there should be no less charge than for seventeen hundred yards. Mr. Councillor LASSELL said that Mr. Garner had told him that he often took ls. fares for coaches. The distinction in that point might be made. Mr. Councillor RuswroN would second Mr Hope's proposi tion. Mr. Councillor BOLTON would support this proposition, as he thought it only reasonable. Mr. Councillor JORDAN thought it would be making hun- dreds and thousands of the poor pay what they could not afford. Mr. Councillor AIK IN supported the Mayor's view. The MAYOR thought the present proceedings irregular. Mr. Councillor HOPE would withdraw his amendment 'if against the will of the council. Mr. Councillor MAXWELL. to put an end to the discussion, moved that the order of the day be proceeded With. The TOWN-CLERK said the next point was to make the charge of toaches the same from places of worship as from places of public amusement—that the charge should only be from the place of worship. 'l'he committee thought that a place of pub lic amusement was a coach stand, and a place of worship was not, and.the-committee thought the law had better stand as it was. Alter some discussion this was agreed to. Mr. Alderinaw.ioNEs would ask how 'the present distances were computed, if it would not be better to charge distances by circles. _ Mr. Alderma❑ BIIOWN said that pla❑ had been thought of, hut was found so complicated- that it had been abandoned. He thought that whenia plan, which was now under consideration, of dividing the town into squares of 100 yards, to be attached as a schedule to the fare!, came into general use, it would be found to answer. The ma;, strates! clerks were now about that. The TowN-cLhaiCsaid there had been a suggestion' that the horses of hackney-coaches- shook he in good condition. This had better be inserted • in the bye-law • which provided coaches should he in good condition—" that the coach,'&e., in all other respects should be fully competent to execute fares when re-' quired."—Agreed to. There was another. suggest ion, that persons hiring a coach and refusing to pay the proper fares, that some penal`ty should be enforced in such cases, -and remuneration given to drivers for loss of time in attending to enforce their charge before the ma gistrates. On looking over the act which related to this he found that there was no such power to inflict penalties on the parties, nor to award compensation to the drivers. But there was a provision which gave power to the owners of coaches to recover their, fares snmmarily 'before any justice, along - with costs. He would - not be obliged, as ordinary parties were, to sue for the debt. Mr. Alderman FREME thought that under the power of -this act a bye-law might he made. The Matoa.—" Excuse me, the Town-clerk, our legal au thority, has considered the'case, and says not:" Mr. Alderman FRAME said he thought in some cases it would be a,very hard case on the drivers. Mr. Councillor I'. SMITH enquired if a coach or a horse were to break down by the way would the parties taking it be obliged to pay the fare. The TOWN-CLERK said that in that case the car-driver would not have completed his contract which he -had undertaken, he could not demand his fare. The Towis-cLiotx said he had now got through the fares of of hackney-coaches, and this class of bye-laws might now be printed. CARTS. The TOWNCLERK said in the bye-law ordering that where an owner employing any driver or conductor fOr a cart who should have been deprived of his license, it was proposed to make three penalties of 205., 405., and £5, instead of 40s. and £s.—Agreed to. The next bye-law, were a person refused to give up his li cense on demand, the fines to be fixed at 103., 205., and 40s.— Agreed The TOWN-CLERK said he was proceeding to a class of live laws relating to carts which had not been considered:—" That if any driver shall allow his 'lorry to stand in a street, not fixed as a public stand, such driver shall forfeit ss. for the first offence, 10s. for the second, and 20s. for the third."—Agreed to. "That every driver and conductor of every lorry shall con stantly assist in loading and unloading the same when he can be spared front his horses without any remuneration for the same. The penalties 55., 10s., and .20s.'—Agreed to. The bye-law regulating the 'stands; and the mode in which the carts should he placed was agreed to. A bye-law that car ters should be as expeditious as possible . in carrving a fare, and that a driver should not be obliged to remain longer than la minutes fur his load, and for which detention he should charge Is. if he went away without a load; or charge it in addition to his fare was then read. Mr. Alderman FREME said these detentions were cases of ne cessity, and that the carter ought to be remunerated at the saute rate as if he was working, but not more. The TOWN-CLERK thought the disappointment ought to be taken into account Mr. Alderman BROWN said carts were constantly detained at the Customhouse, and at the bonded warehouse, and Is. for the first quarter of an liour, and 6d. afterwards might be charged. Mr. Councillor BOLTON said he found there was a provision to charge is. 6d. per hour in another bye-law. The TOWN-CLERK.—Suppose there be a provision that the carter be allowed to charge by time at his option. Mr. Alderman FaEma would place carters on the same rate as coaches. If they detained a coach they paid at the rate of 6d. for every quarter of an hour's detention. That the pay ment should be of the nature of a remuneration, and not as a penalty. Mr. Councillor MORECROFT said it was the custom for mer chants to hire half-a-dozen carts at once, and the first that came on turn was loaded. It would be a heavy charge on the mer chants if those casts which had to wait were entitled to charge for that. ( Hear.) Mr. Councillor BIRCH moved that the law be passed, which was seconded and agreed to; the law remaining as it stood. "That no person under the age of 18 be permitted to take charge of the steerer of a timber-carriage under a penalty of ss. for the first offence, and 10s. and 20s. for the second and third offences." Mr. Councillor RATunoNE thought the person should not be under the age of 21. Those carts required an able-bc.died man to take charge of them. The bye-law, after some discussion, was agreed to as it stood. "That any driver who should refuse to have his carriage in spected by a police-officer, &c., in order that the quantity of packages might be examined, should incur a penalty of ss. for the first offence, 10s. for the second, and 20s. for the third."— agreed to. "That if the driver of any lorry shall refuse when called, and not engaged. to take any load, he shall incur a fine of 55., 10s., and 20s."—Agreed to. The Tow N-CLERK said there was a bye-law for ensuring the numbering of carts the same as coacher, which would be intro duced, and then the bye-laws as to carts might be reprinted. Mr. Councillor BLACKBURN inquired if the penalty on .tLe person steering a carriage being under age were to be fixed on the lad or the owner. The TOWN-CLERK said the by ,e-law would Le worded so as to make the owner amenable. Mr. Councillor BLACKBURN inquired if the owners could be made responsible fur the conduct of their servants. The TOWN-CLERK said there was a l ega l diffi cu lty i n that question • but they had been lately m a ki ng b ve •l aws f or licens ing the question; and making the owners proauco their drivers when required, which,would as far as possible ensure the good conduct of the drivers. Wir.*Cotiricilkor AIK Said that:l4elaw N0..6, which enacted that any driver:ceasing to act as such. sihould not deliver up his license should incur a penalty; a was his opinion that it would be inoperative. • • The M A YOU said it was to prevent persons ceasing to act as carters, transferring their licenses, or selling them. STEAM-BOATS. The TOWN-CLERK said there was a reference about. steam boats to consuming their smoke. The committee had con sumed some fioie on the subject, and were only enabled to state that they had In) authority to interfere in that respect. , Mr. Councillor hope.—" Their endeavours have ended in smoke.". (A laugh The TowN-cLERK had only now to state, that it appeared to the committee with reference to lights in warehouses, that the regulations should be confined to warehouses let out, and kept by warehouse-keepers, or pi ivate warehouses let out in a similar manner, but not to extend to private warehouses used as such. Mr. Councillor 'l'. Hour thought all warehouses, without ex ception, used fur the storing of goods ought to be liable to it. And•that counting-houses only should be excepted. After some further discussion it was arranged that the Town clerk should form a bye-law on this subject, to be submitted at the next meeting. Mr. Alderman BROWN then moved an adjournment to Sa turday morning at eleven o'clock, when the bye-laws are to be passed. MUNICIPAL ELECTION. On the first of November the election of seventeen Councillors will take place, sixteen to supply the vacancies occasioned by members who go out by rotation, and one to supply the vacancy caused by the death of Mr. Shavp!es. All the wards will be fiercely contested. We subjoin a list of the retiring members avd of the names of the candidates on both sides:— WARD. GOING OUT. AIONSERVATIVBS. - 1' Evrtn 3r Kirdl Horsfall+.... .las. Heyworth. 2 Scotland-road Richard Shiel... R. Houghton. 3 Vauxhall-road J. D. Thornely+ Wm. Shand 4 St. Paul's.... 'John Barton.... John Barton 5 Exchanw .... James Mellor... Thomas Sands. 6 Castle-street. Thos. 801t0n.... John Wilkinson. st. Peter's.... Richard Bright.. N. Litherland 8 Pitt-street. W. It. Preston.. John Bibby 9 Gt. George's.. James Aikinf... Chas. Lawrence 10 Rodney-stre ,, t Thomas H01t.... J N. Wood 1L• Abercromby. T. Brotitlebank. Thomas Kaye • 12 Lime-street.: It. Roskelt Ambrose Lace... 13 St. Ann's.... Riche. Alison+— John Wright. .. 14 West Di lay.. 'Jos. Sand irsf John Smith..... Francis .Fortttn T. 'lll.- Gladstone.' Li S. Toxteth. } Sharples . .t llPx. Smith.. • 16 North Toxteth Chas. Tayleurf The members going out marked thus (').are Co + Olemters who retire. Deceased, REFORMERS. George Quayle Richard Shiel. James Muspratt. James Stitt.. James Mellor.. Thos. Bolton Richard Bright.. W. It. Preston Henry It_ipley. Thomas Holt T. Brocklehank. Vincent Flig4ins. Joseph Mason. R. W. Wood Francis Jordan Jonathan Platt Geor,e Ramsden. nservatives. THE INC,OLLENikNII LINEN TRADE. ( From the Leeds Intellige!zcer.) Tn.+ nE OF LEEDs.—We have very little alteration to report in the state of the woollen trade since our last. The workmen are kept moderately well employed, tint the merchants are only buying to order and to keep up assorted stocks. 13' DFoan MARKET.—The amount of business transacted on_ Thursday was less than it has bien for some time past, al though there was a pretty numerous attendance of buyers. The prices of malidaeturea goods, however, remained firm. The demand for yarns was flat, and prices teceded a little. The transactions in wool were very limited, and on reduced terms. BRADFORn. OCT, 21.—1 am happy to give a better acconnt of yesterdaN's market than fur some weeks back, though priys remain much the same as last week. In wool touch business was done, as was also the case in tops and yarns at a slight re- Auction. The piece market was rather languid in the lower qualities, bu: fine goods met with a ready sale. Ou the whole, the manufacturers in general think there is little g round for alarm, as front the experience of fOrmer years, the tra de is more or less depressed towards the close of the year. HALIFAX, WEDNESDAY.—There has been more business done in this market to-day than for some weeks back, but at lower prices. The manufacturers are in rather low spirits as as to future prospects, especially as yarns do nut come down so- as to enable them to mate their goods at 'the prices at which they are obliged to - sell ; their stock - begins to be heavy. HECKNONDWIKE.—The Blanket Hall has for the last feW market days been thinly attended by the merchants and buyers; the consequence is, a decline in the price of those articles so necessary for the approaching winter. WAKEFIELD Woor. MARKET, Oct. 21.-We do not report any-variation in the trade this week, the demand is dull and few sales passing; yet notwithstanding the long flatness, there is no materiel decline in pries, which may be attributed to the firm ness with which the growers hold what is still left in the coun try, and the little disposition they evince to, sell at even old prices. ROCHDALE FLANNEL MARKET, Oct. 17.—To•dav the market has been flat, and but little business has been done; the buyers wanting goods at lower prices on account of the fall in the price of wool. The wool market has also been very slack, and but few purchasers. THE MATTERS OF LivEtiPool. have generally come to the determination to close their shops at eight o'clock (Saturday night excepted) during the winter season, from the let of No vember to the let of March. AN INSPECTOR FOUND GUILTY.—We are of opinion that Mr. Maunsell is, entitled to the gratitude of all who think the con duct of the present police oppressive to the inhabitants of Li verpool. The sentence passed on Inspector Pool is 4los. and costs. Mr. Maunsell is a reduced gentleman, and in bringing this haughty underling to a serrse of duty, for an outrageous assault,•we are of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to public approbation. THE SANDON CONSERVATIVE GRAND MARCH.—We believe - that this is the first piece of music which .tas been expressly composed and published, as an 'apanage to the conservative cause. It was played by the band at the Ilo;41 Amphitheatre on Friday evening, at the conclusion of Sir Thomas Brancker's speech; and if we may be allowed to criticise its merits, as a musical composition, we are . free to state, that it is both soul stirring and impressive ; and it reflects an additional honor on the spirit of Liverpool, when to her' genius is to be ascribed this first martial accompaniment to our national constitutional cause. It affords us much pleasure to learn that Sir RObert Peel and Lady Peel are. enjoying improved health since their return. We have been assured by a private friend that Sir Robert is greatly improved in constitutional strength, or we should rather say bodily strength, by his short continental tour. Ile is now ent,frcitining his private friends and enjoying the full comforts of an English home. Lord Brougham arrived in London on Saturday from Auck land Castle. lie was soon afterwards .visited by several private friends; and their report speaks highly in favour of his lordship's improved health. He was rather jocular upon the state of po litical affairs; but now and then his pleasantry partook of the caustic vein ; and.agreeably with his intimation in the north, gave indication of a "fair start," and a wiry run, in the ensu ing parliamentary hunting season. On Sunday he took a trip to his. villa at Petersham, and returned home to dinner. We, have not.as yet learned, that any of the leading members of the cabinet of whig exquisiles have, honoured his lordship with a cald;, the author of "-the Pleasures of- Hope," is amongst the last -..isitors. IMPoRTANT OPINION OF THE FRENCH PRESS.—" Sir Robert Peel has conic to enquire into the state of public opinion iu France. One - must see and be enabled to listen to that select society, (sorield chaise,) Sir Robert Peel, Count Pozzo di Borgo, M. Mole, M. Pasquier—all those intelligent and prac tised statesmen who have seen and handled•people during the last thi ty years—one must see and listen to them to take pity dpon all the incupocities of the Revolution• and Thiers party, destitute alike of ideas and the science of governing. (!) Ycs, we love to predict it—we shall assuredly 'have a Peel and Stanley administration in England ere six months be elapsed. The rational whip will strike off the rule of 0 Connell and join the furies, who wish to preserve the unity and strength of the British empire. English aristocracy will resume its beauti fully noble bearing; it is that aristocracy which has fur succes sive ages funned the glory and the strength Of 'England! Great Britain is indignant at submitting to the dominion of a loquacious tribune of the mob. Sir Robert Peel and Lord Stanley are the friends nod partizans of a slow and moderate reform, such as Europe may wish for. Between retrogade men and the -champions of subversion, there is in France, as in 1 4 .:neland, a school of 'compromise, naturally called to assume the direction of the state.—Tramtiated from La Chroaique de . Paris.—[We•leave our Whig-radical friends to ponder these sentiments.—En.] THE DUCHESS OF KENT.—It is said that the mother of the heiress !presumptive to the protestant throne of Great Britain, •has given £2O more towards the completion of the Team Mass house. We confess this intelligenceis by sio means such as we can pass over Without remark. The Duchess of Kent might, we can easily conceive, have been betrayed into the first gift of £5O to aid the work of superstition ; but the second act, suc ceeding as it does to the daring intolerance of the ver y part i es very Yn much like one of premeditation,premeditation,if not a on the persecut ors o f prot e s ' ant i sm. Let on wh om her Royal Highness has been ple a s e d t o b estow her smilef v favours, rs ofapp rob looks pi her Royal liighness beware! A great movement is now taking .place in Great Britain. - Protestantism is about to rise with an im.pect more formidable than it ever bore since the revolution of 16a, Popery will soon display its weakness in Ireland, as the trepidation of the Roman .hierarchy testifies. Their threatened effort to preach against the protestant religion next mouth, will accelerate their downfall, by augmenting that spirit of enquiry among their flocks—already causing them to gnaw their tongues with pain." The people of England may take it into their heads to construe'literally the bill of rights as it affects a British sovereign; and lei... Royal Highness may find, to her grief, that she has sided with far the weaker party, and involved her innocent daughter in seriously inconvenient unpopularity. These are not times for crowned heads to tatupe k r with the basis of their titles.—Dublin Record. SUSPECTED MURDER of A WIFE BY HER HUSBAND.—A man named Peter M`Kenna, an Irish navigator, is now in custody m this town, awaiting the result of a coroner's inquest, now holding upon the body of. his wife. The prisoner, aho is the father of a large , family, occupied a cellar in Carlton-street, in the vicinity of the canal. It appears that the neighbours were on Saturday night disturbed by the noise,proceeding from a quarrel between the deceased, Margaret M•Kenna and the pri soner. On Monday morning the prisoner waited upon Mr. Shar rocks, a surgeon ; he said that the surgeon must eo to his house to s ee his wife; Mr. Sharrocks accordingly went there and found t he deceased lying upon, her back. 'The prisoner said he bad struck her rather heavily, and the deceased, on being asked where she felt pain,. said that !ter pain was very great, and that she had great difficulty in breathing, On an examinatioa, the surgeon f o und that he time ribs on b ot h s id es o f h er b o dy were more or l ess fractured; bled her and applied other remedies, but the de ceased died on Tuesday morning,. Mr. Sharrocks, assisted by Mn. Black, another surgeon, have since examined the body of the deceased. All the ribs on the left side were broken, five of them fractured in two places. The eighth rib was fractured and ' the splintered end prounded through the pleara. On the right s ide five ribs were broken, two of them in two places; several pieces i of bone had b een f orce d i n t h e l ungs , an d the stomach a penetrated by a portion of the broken rt es. In time opinion of the me di ca l men, t h ese fractures cau se of the death of the d ecease d. They could not have _bei.n ot occ asioned by a fall, as . even f a lli n g a great height could in order to give time for the have broken the ribs on both sides of the body of the dree ti a r s n e;i d • The coroner, at seven o'clock on Wednesday evening adjourned the inquest,further production ev idence.— Yesterday the inquest wa s resumed, furth e 'h a yieg, been obtaireed, when the jury found a verdict of man. slaughter against the prisoner. vidence Io the animals of medical sci e nce few medicines have obtained s o high and well-merited a l degree of celebri t y as 1V RAY'S 'BALSAMIC PILLS. Th e i r infallible healing properties are ,i lt A i y n , e s d s fully demonstrated by the perfect restorati on to health of an irn. le Medi nob mens e number,of persons affiicted with strictores and rine has mos t judiciously excluded fro m these p ills that dele terious a eopaiba, w hi c h may account 'n some de g r ee f or other dis orders of the.urethra. The Proprietor of th is invaluable Chrmns e l e• • es tablished their fame for ever."----ifor"i"Y the astonishing cures they have e ffected. and. which ha ve Mr. Robert Briggs, of Ulverstone, was fined by the magis trates of that Owa £32, for a second incringiaent oklle faetory act.—Cataberldmid Packet. ---~ - "~ - LECTURE ON OPTICS, MECHANICS' INStiTUTION. On Wednesday evening, Robert. Addams, Esq., delivered the seventh. cif his highly inteiesting lectures. The phenomena of vision, coaisidered in all its generality and in its connexion with the human mind, is a subject of scientific enquiry full of difficulty, and as vet but imperfectly understood. Indeed it is hardly to be supposed that we shall imour present conilitiou be able to determine the absolute connexion be tween mind and matter; but we ought not to suffer a belief in the impossibility of obtaining information on these matte' s , to stand as a barrier to our obtaining more information than we tv possess. •• The eye is an optical instrument, composed of several parts. Expressed generally, there are three coatings or cases fur the eye, and three . fluids or semi-liquids. The eye, when divided perpendicularly from the front to the back, will show, on the outside, a coating which is called " the sclerotic coat." Now, this is, a thick membrane of the eye, having very few blood vessels in it, and, when the eye is lifeless, it is of a leathery kind of consistency and inure difficult to cut than thick buff-leather ;• a pair of scissors, sharp as they may be, will be found incapable of cutting it, and a knife, sharp as a razor, will make little im pression on the lower parts of it ; therefore, it is admirably adapted to preserve the eye. To the front of this coat is attach ed a transparent shell, like a watch glass, called " the cornea," from its having been supposed to be formed of horn; but it is inure like bladder than horn. On the inside of this outer tough coat is another, composed of a black substance, called " the choroid" coat, which is continued to the front portion of the eye, where terminates, or, rather, becomes a new adjunct to the eye, called the iris, that part of the eye which determines its colour. In that part of the eye there is a .central hole, which, in the human creature, is round, but in other animals it assumes a varied form. We find there is much wisdom in the formation of this entrance, according to the habits of different creatures. The human head is placed on the shoulders verti cally, and can readily be turned round without much Modem of the body, consequently, the round shape is given to man as the one which will best enable him to see in every direction; but, in the ease Of horses, cows, sheen, &c., whose heads are at the extremity of an horizontal neck, it would be inconvenient to turn the head round to see objects to the right and left. The hole or pupil in their eye is isorizontally elongated, which en ables them to see to the right and left much more readily than the human race. But, in the squirrel and - the cat, the elonga tion is upward. Now, the squirrel has to leap from tree to tree, and it is necessary that its sight should be most perfect in a verti cal direction. We might advert to many others; but these will shew the wisdom of Providence in adapting the parts of the .body to their purposes. At the inside of this coat (which is so tender that a pin will scratch it) is another metwbrane, called the retina. This interior part is of' very great importance, to being the nervous part of the eye, or that part of the eye in which the sensation of light takes place. It is of a structure like the meshes of a net, as its name implies. This retina has its origin in a part of the eye called the optical nerve, which passes into the head through a sheath, and branches out into the brain, becoming a part of the brain itself. In the interior of these coats, we have three humours, or liquids—perhaps better called humours, as they are not liquid like water. The most conspicuous of these will lie the vitreous hbmour which occupies the greater portion of the interior part of the eve. Now, this humour is Out so liquid as water nor so thick or dense as jelly. It is perfectly colourless, and as transparent as the purest water that can be round. It is, moreover, enclosed in a membrane. or bag, forming one interior globular mirror, excepting at the de pression in trout. We then come to auother, which is called the lens of the eve, or, for the sake of distinction, the crystalline lenS. It is muil thicker than the calf's-foot jelly which we find in gimps, transparent as water itself, and inside up of fibres twisted backwards and forwards. The crystalline lensei of some creatures are composed of layers of shells. We then come to the front of the eye, and, in the space between the crystalline lens and the cornea, winch is the outside part of the whole, there is dispersed a humour which is called the aqueous humour. This is as liquid as water, and when a lancet is used to pierce its covering it flows out and leaves the cornea flaccid, its use being to push out the cornea in a lens-like manner. Mr. Addams illustrated the foregoing description by means of a beautiful mechanical representation of the eye, of similar size to that iu a human being, in which the various coatings, humours, muscles, uerves, and membranes were faithfully re presented by ivory, glass, &c. The eye is furnished with mus cles by which it can be moved in any direction without the ne cessity of stirring the head. When one of these muscles has. not the same power of cont action or elongation as the rest it does not sufficiently counterbalance theist, and causes that com plaint called squinting. Mr. Addams here dissected the ese of an ox, and explained the various parts of it to the audience. The crystalline lens is similar to the cross lens of the telescope, more round on the one side than the other, and magnifies like the tensor a microscope. The structure of the eye being thus described, we must pro ceed to consider it as an optical instrument; and, first, we can not but admire the arrangement of the humours of the eye, so efficient for the leading of light from the front of the eye to the retina, where the image is formed devoid of the errors of spheri cal aberration. In a former lecture the achromatic telescope of Dollond was adverted to, in which three glasses were used to prevent aberration, and to correct the prismatic colours. These glasses were of different forms, and of two descriptions of glass. Now in the eye the humours are of different degrees of density. The aqueous, and the vitreous, and use crystalline lens possess different degrees of refractive power. The vitreous lens is round on one side and concave on the other; the crystalline is rounder on one side than on the other. We find great advantage from this in correcting the phenomena of spherical aberration. Here, then, we have the aqueous humour, which is concave on the one side, ann convex on the other. These have different refractive posers, the aqueous index being 1,33 i, the vitreous being rather more than 1,339. But in the crystalline lens we find. a peculiar adaptation which man has never been able to adopt, that of having .the centre of greater density than the surface. In making a glass, we are obliged to submit to have it of one density throughout the whiffle; but if we were able to snake glasses denser towards the centre, we should be able to obtain a better focus than we are at present able. to do. In the crystalline lens the index of refraction is 1,376 in front, 1,399 'in the centre, and 1,383 at the back, by which means spherical aberration is entirely removed.. In the telescope. we have a black disc, called the diaphragm, in order to prevent the light which' comes in at the mouth of the telescope from striking against the sides of the brass, and, by being reflected, injuring the image. In the eye we • find a black screen placed appa rently fur the same purpose. In the telescope and microscope we ought to have adjustments for the eye-glass so as to be able to accommodate them to any distance. The same arrangement is provided in the, eve. If we look at a Loup which is near, the eve requires adjustment, and if at .a distant object, ft requires another adjustment, This is managed liv means of a capsule attached to certain muscles in contact with the pupil of the eye. Tile eye is frequently exposed to light of various degrees of in tensity, and an arrangement is made by which we can see at - midday and by, twilight. This consists in the contraction or. or enlargeinent of a membrane by whirls mute or. less light is admitted through the central hole. This is remarkable in cats' eyes when the sun is shining strong; the contraction is then very 'great. Astwo images orals object are formed in the re tina by our eves, it may he asked why we do not see two objects? We do see two objects, but we see then' exactly in the sante. position. one lapped over the other, so that they app ear on l y with one s e . y t a i n s d , one, that is, provided the eye be pr o p er ly adjusted. Now it isW • well - knon that we can see bodies very shouldve well be w the question might arise why there perhaps, in part fur the sake of symmetry and beauty of ap pearance, as we have two arms, two ears, &c. TwO eyes may be better with regard to appearance than .one; but yet if all mankind were formed with but one eye, we should nut find any deformity iu it; therefore that does not at all follow. But we may conceive that we have two eyes, because being a precious organ, should we lose one, we might have the other. Besides we can certainly see better with two g e ., y , e t s ie t t h n tn with ti is plainly shown even by brutes. A ( a me. favourite toad and raven in the same garden. The wild used to get iu the path Way of the ants, and by darting out his tongue secure a great 'mustier of them. It, howeier, happeiseda that the raven and toad disagreeing, the former picked out the eve of the lat ter, after which the toad was tumble to capture his prey as well as berme. Two eyes give us a more ample view, than we ether-• wise should h ave . We can see half a circl e , or 180 0 , when troth our eyes are open, whilst we can see little more than 100 ° with one eye alone. There is a part of the retina which is in,sensible - tolight, where the optical 'serve passes into the shell. The nerve becomes a bun dle offibres,.which will not vibrate to the undulations of the anther This fact is proved by several experiments. if we place th ree s p o t s t wo f e et asunder on the wall, and stsud 10 feet from them, we shall see one of these three objects disappear . als together. whilst steadily looking wills one eye at either of the others. The fact is that the eye is so situated that the light from the invisible spot falls_ upon the optical nerve and disappears. We find every thing beautifully perfect in the organization of man, and this nerve accordingly is past the axis of vision, nearer the nose, and therefore out of the way of the light coming. Every part of the retina excepting that, is sensible to light, btit there is only one part of it which is perfect, and we always turn that past, which is towards the axis of the eye, to any thing which we wish to ...scrutinize particularly. In reading writing, or print, the image of every distinct letter is formed upon the retina. It may appear singular how we should see a person erect, when his image on the back part of the eye is turned upside down. The fact is, that we see through the inside of the eye, and not as through a telescope tube. There are many creatures who are so sensitive, that they can see light when there appears , to be cone. The cat, rat, and mouse can see light whet , the walls are of a three fold thickness ; else how are we to suppose that rats will run round the wainscotting of a house, on a ledge, not half an inch in diameter? What is sight but undulation; therefore, as vibration is continually goons on every s r s e l:c i, l; ti e; ?. there may be light enough generated to act upon h snare the or explained satisfactorily, by the aid of an apparatus, whv sv tt t ,a. even in the darkest dungeons. Mr. Addams f. t i e o n not lailled ob jects reversed, as their image is formed in the i retina. When the eves do not perform their by age, rays do'not fall as they ought reach the retina, and usage they Thus in short-sighted persons they co ni o e tt(fi) tt i s d. euosaot upon ) r . e ace focus ic) before te t ,di h c e tii i 3e ' e tf r t ho v h;e u s y s , f detects are obviated, and the i when they came to the retina..avßs c y a t u l h m s el s d . s e si t l fall properly.i he with rega rd the to e,g e e xte it rna lf l bodies, byssup eye may be diseased posing them to he in motion when se ttnconsciously itoppea'a short time moves. The lecturer had looked at a body which he believed to be stationary, and had seen it run up. apparently with gr ea t o llo N ss e 't s u s: ' the passengers to inspect beauti velocit y. This happened in Scotland a few years ago. He was and the packet f a ll, Mr. Addams was observing the manner in which coming down L for the purpose of a a therit.l w ,T a k t . t e v i e ' s oitika i sp,wa a ti t e e u rca a l r l p s a u r c t c o e f ed t e h d e o w t a is ter , another, and kept 'or that purpose. motion in an opposite direction to the his eye fixed‘lv.ihiti:r,ina'ttuhlish:vyienginsatisfied himself, he turned round to the rock on his left, and to his surprise the whole of it appeared to be going up with the same velocity 4s the waterfall was coining fery moments at external obj ects, w hil st t h e carr i ages down. A similar effect is felt on the railway, ilthe eye looks • f n o i r o ve rapidly along. The a ebevratiou of light is a phenomenon attended with an apparent displacement of the stars in the heavens. When ice look at a star it appears to be a little farther east than its true place by a very minute portion. Now, supposing that a star was perpendicular to an observer, and a ray or Wave to leave it towards his eye, by the time that it reached him the earth would have travelled In her orbicular path, so that that the per pendicular ray w ou ld not come near the observer.' Besides this action of the earth, the diarnal motion is productive of a varied aberration which together with the orbicular aberration, must be taken into considration by astronoMers. In the next lecture to be delivered to-morrow evening, lqr. Addams will treat (in optical deceptions, the duration of im pressions made on the retina—light and shade—perspective re presentations, and on the optical spectra occasioned by the superposition of illuminated surfaces. 11YALL'S PORTRAITS OF 'EMINENT CONSERVATIVE STA MEN.—We are happy to find that this spirited underetakin his is attracting general notice. We have repeatedly- spokn of series of portraits with the most cordial approbation ; and we have, now to add that the publisher is g aining fresh and in creasing popularity by his beautiful series of port,r,a4s of distin guished British Females. We are sure that no degree of suc cess which we can wish him will be commensurate with his deserts. Both these works are a,sort of national property— and as such they will be generally appreciated, i A. 77 - 7711rtr - _ Ottl . . . CO RI? E PDX DE NE ~iN.:-. v. . _.. COUNCILLOR E. SNll'ill AND E. V T VS'ID', , .Z ' ? 4 - 1 -'' A, l ,. . . TO TIM EDITOR OF THE LIVERPOW, ST.I, ''fiv i i).l; ,- ;_ : ,... - ;.;...., .'44 .. Sin, 7 -I perceive there is in the last Lieei•poui, Afererif 7 sl , • ; ii • f:.." , :. ii:l4 / other epistle from Mr. Weston, with; of :course, eity s _eTiaixi•i i4 4'. ''• ..!?,•',;i':• - • 1 0 preface.. '1 he of the leftei has not ut!vreLi any Vtritpiat / -,,, '::.;;;'-•:,//:„.., imperatively 'calls for a -reply: lie seems glad of Al' opor:4 ''''... .:%" :',7,• -, tunny of eolifirtning the fact, that he was a "main iustrutrieW --- -A.,:',...` "••?v, in returning Mr. E. Saiith to the council; awl lie ii,liisis that; i ',.. i •-::___ - 7 if he had thought proper—",thuuyht prupvi . "—he might have / been a member of the council.- • . I did not assert that C;:nncillor Smith Wes 'Mr, Weston's " nominee," nor any thing to :tat tifect. He has fully coni firmed all that I said, or, meant; tlieretore; he might, if he ha 4 "thought proper," have withheld his balderdash about the ballot; but such stuff suits the calibre of the Merani y. The editorial remarks abotit " uninteiligible" ate readily ac« counted for; if it he borne in nliud that obtuseness is •getierailf the characteristic of old women. • Can the editor of the,7llercary persoade his readers to regard this as a " slatider October 24, 1836. MEUNIER. Y TO THE EDITOR 61'. THE STANDARD. am informed some alderman or councillor used an expression in the council chamber the other day which I can not understand: it was " grindstones-aud slates. Cain you relate correctly how and when it was used, and by whom; and if the worthy personage wbo,so expresscd himself should happen to be a retiring councillor; and purposes again to' offer himself; perhaps he will explain-to his constituents the meaning of the expiessionoind its applicability to the mutter to which it was applied. A good explanation may secure his -election ;• at all events no one will deny the elegance of the expression, mut per haps not itsoiriginality.—Yours, • A VOTER. Drury-lane, October 2-1, 1836,.- • • •► [We beg to refer.our correspondent- to Nr.Councillorl3olton for an explanation, 'lt will oe given, we-have no doubt, with his aceustothed urbanity and condescension.—En.] TO THOMAS HOLT, ESQ. Stu.—llaving to retire frail the council chainher, you are again 'soliciting our votes that you may tie reinstated in your former -place. • Now, sir, may I inquire what are your pretensions, and what good have you-done for the ward of -whicti you are a member which you can bring forward as a reason fig : again asking ma for my vote ? It is not my present 'ptitioaze to point:out what you have done. 1 1-ave that to Noursed or to Mr. Waluisley, who I petceive is the apologist oftlie whole council; but 1 wilt suggest to you what you hare not You have paid llu at tention to the state of the streets within your ward, or Rice, street (a street leading oat of the vets stream which }ou , live) would not fie, us at present, ;Lilly ; La voonx, and impassable.. Mulberry-street, particularly the sou:b end, would be better lighted and flagged, and Muiberry-place (1. ading out of Mul berry:street) would he rendered less dangerous. hr having one tt•- slight in i., and by an improvement in the paving, which is in a dangertios state. lam fully aware that you . are neither iv commissioner of lightnig nor of : ,paving; litV.;lt word or two ernan.iting from vol.'. as councillig -of the ward:Poidu haye its due weight'in the proper quarter, and would show that you are: alive to the' comforts of those thiough whose interest you.hold your seat.—You rs,' Ste., A VOTER. Liverpool, October 19, 1:836. TO TILE ELECTORS OF ST. PAUL'S WARD. GENTLEMEN,—The day for deciding who i. to be chosen your representative in council is close at hand. Two candidates are in the field : one is Mr. Barton, a tradesman, tt. resident: a neighbour, of something like thirty years standing; who by . his industry, perseverance, and uncorniirionisinb.flntearity, has riEeny to promotion. Would it be inconsistent to suppose, if he again be elected that he would do his utmost to promote the interest and prosperity of your ward? Solely not. Do we want a mar. ket in Powmi LL-SQUA ? If so, refer to his conduct on that question, and you will find he did hiS duty. The other is a ➢lr: Stitt, a very clever man. they say; a reformer,•r'.i.rsooth, as though Mr. Barton was not ! For the sake of information; , let somebody define this msapplied word.. Is it a,thing called a weathercock—a reed shaken with the wind? Refer to Mr. Bar. ton's votes, and you will there find he has acted independently of any party. But what signifies that ?. Those who have brought Mr. Stitt forward have no teasonable motive—it has been done merely to satisfy the raving jealousies of one or two envious in, dividuals, who have, and will again, no doubt, stoop to any meatiness to vilify and calumniate the character of an honest man. And will the electors of St. Paul's Ward pamper to the passions and fancies of such TI-11S ? The answer will be. give❑ on Tuesday next; there will be an opportunity then to, support a neighbour, or desert him without a cuuse.-1 remaiu, Gentlemen, your very obedient servant. 'Liierpool, 26th October. AN INHABITANT. - TO THE ELECTORS OF VAUXHALL WARD. GENTLEMEN,—On the first of November, a representative will he chosen to assist (or at least lie will profess to do so) in abating nuisances and legislating for the comforts and veneral interests of the inhabitants in your Ward. Between this and the day of election you will have au opportunity of deciding whether common sense will be your guide or whether that hack., neyed word, REFORM. Will persuade vim that you ar•e breathing. pure air, and that coughing front the effect of noxious i..apouts is beneficial to your healthy. Should your wisdom direct vOu to Support an individual who is the cause of one of the greatest nuisances that ever infested a neighbourhood, because be, Mr. Muspratt, has just found out all nuisances should be abated, you 'must at. once admit you can be persuaded to anythiog. Should you reject Mr. Muspratt and elect Mr. Shand, you give our• neighbourhood a .chance of being represented by one whose_ public cnaracterallows hits toenterthe council-room unshackled, and one who can oppose those nuisances without sacrificing his interests—One who has tiO'need of making hypocritical promises. The business habits of Mr. Shand are Well known to the com mercial community of Liverpool, You will find in .lOrn o.ne, who is able and willing to render: effectual assistance in pre oting the local interests of your Watd and toe general -in ferests-of the town at large.-1 remain. Gentlemen, . '• A DISINTERESTED SUPPORTER,OF AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE. ST. MICHAEL'S ORGAN. TO THE EDITOR OF THE LIVERPOOL ST/IND.IRD. -, Ste,—A paragraph having appeared in the Afbion, athe 24th instant, siguea " A Constant Reader," stating that he perfectly. retiollecti‘dwind instruments t o ha ve accom p an i e d S t. Mi c h ae l' s organ, durlng the first festival, after the erection of that instru ment, I beg leave to contr a di c t th e assertion, which 1 can prove to be a palpable . falsehood, khoa leg several respectable individuals who were present at the time referred to, and who,• unlike the anonymous scribbler of the paragraph alluded to, are 'npt ashamed to have their names mentioned if required. The organ having been originally put np by the builders half a tone under Broadwood's standard concert pitch, fully justifietL Sir lleorge Smart in not usiOg it at the late festival, as it would he utterly impossible to accompany an organ in that s!ate witlr wind instruments which are up to standard Pitch; and the time was too limited to allow of its being altered for the occasion. I. trust that a hat I have now stated, and my foianer explanation, in the Mercury, of the ith instant, and oth e r p a p ers , h ave h em fully explicit; therefore, any other letters that may appear front anonymous scribblers, referring to that subject, (•heing fully 'aware of the quarter from which they emanate;) I strati treat with the silent contempt they merit.-1 in, &c., W. DREAPEIt. 32, Ranelagh-strret, October 27, ]S33. P.S.—I should like, when more at leisure, to [Hake a few in quiries respecting the trumpet slop in St. George's cugun. COM . III4CIAL INTELLIGENCE. will .. , in a g le w tt a e s r p l o r s t t A e n d t a h t e L AVe 'd n ' t s s on tu S L a l t o u . :d l; :, V t — Elsinore, o fe n c l t v ed ;et 1836 :—'• liavannah is no longer declared in-, dated The E,xt or faocelttl..io)%• 15, V ro e u s r se d l a s ys fr , o g n u t a thence, rani,e % , ,: r if , h ,bs c e l r e v a „ i t i i,, b n i . l , l i s of health i Extract of a letter flow the agents to Lloyd's, at Gkeninoagd,:inanteiicle, Oct. 13, 1836 :—" 'lhe Supreme Board of Health of this city have Napleslaid (Sicily a quarantine excluded) days, a c : o si i:ii : i! hni f an r i tz i l i ; i ss i tui lli ocr e eeti:t t.,,r Oct.. ~2t. it.h_ e.. 1 ablt. good) to he lauded in the lazaretto. The following teas also posted : h t i e i ' e s °l : l ) . l , r , t i l ( s ;l ,A l t e i i p: " l ' s l i :t a ii i r n e gF ti olis 1 0 req uest St. Helena will be ins' nicted to ve the A fhirs of Ll9l:ohriit,:ss,stattati)itate,t I ttho h e a tu v h l e ,e : vir:Cierelimr,ni before 10 itt. s c ‘g i t . i. : a )v: i t il i i ): S : e n t i% l: .re' e a —r s y l t t-I : i ' e; y c i • il l in l i t a:i m t t;s: ~t g , h i e , e l h i tagentsiai II i y , :: iji of the : i t ' j e t; : e . ( i j s . :t , n a r n b :I i i i m i s , :hl . r i e n o i : ll tlis p s uch u t : . S 6 1 : 11 ) : 1 )::: , 1 1: prov: • ded that no char ge on that aCcount he imposed on tho Treasury of the island. , (Sigued " To W. Dubsou, Esq., Lloyd's." JANIKS STEPHUN. RANK OF ENGLAND. , Quarterly Average of the Weekly I,i4boeties and Assets of the Bank Of E ng l an d , front the 2Cith July to the 18th 00oher, inclusive, p u bli s h e d . . pursuant to the Act 3 and 4 Will. 4, c ; 98. Lt.Anit.rri vi z. ASSETS. Circulatiu ti ... . _ , 15.0(X) 4- '17.936,006 I Se DePosits• • • •-• • • ....13.324,0(X) I Builcoti 5,257,0(X) £31,260,040 1 Downing•street, Ott. 21, 1836. Wit ALE FISHING.—LATEaT Naws.—Thc Nnptune, Penny art ivpd off Peterhead on the 18th in,tAnt, fn•w Davis ' Stiaits with 8 fish, 87 tuns oil. Reports the I),e, Gamblin, 5U tuns ane the St. Andrew, Bluce, from •1U to 50 tuts. 1; 1 3'1,102, 00, • BRITISH EXPORTS.—The declared value of British exports in the six mouths ending July, 1836, is more than tot) millions and a half greater titan in the corresponding period of last year:, the two stuns being £20,035,406 iu 1835, and £22,E81,744 iu 1836. " llNti):4 is STnENGTII." —The Rev. Dr. Martin has written - a letter, which appears in Dublin I , :renin9 Mail, .ituul:iv reeom mending the establishment of a Conservative Association for all Ireland. On Friday last. as Mr. llnekin, the engineer of St. Day, was returning from the mines on u valuable horse, in turning the corner of the town the animal c o ne suddenly in contact with a wa, go n and was killed. Mr. flockin escaped unhurt.— Guru/rail L huyal Gazelle. • of t s l p e e l; i N ci l it a i j a es t lt , l7 ,. Q th u r e e e e n , o ve f e ß k e s lg d i t io u n to say, they i n liydecourt, Fitzroy-. i i :,,sa,i i i c , t il t i , l i , he ut l• ti ery t - i , i l e es K iro ii t l iS g. • , , square, i lu E l l l i : e x t,,, :r t il: i A l i ) :( a i : cn 6 l , lD l Y to i nt N i t' n. : e i i : d i a i v g yle l v i : l i e u, i i i : iri r ti o hs f -: v . e t — r, r )l ( n l e i ii rn S t l2 : N .h i t ' u: i . Satur day morn i ng , .11: t o u r e n: nbg,,) buys the e a n wife o t o , e f , Tuesday girl. It is most urtnntaeri ta y l:! a c t, th a it ve W n . o il , l v is el i a .: l 3 , : e x d ty s - i f i l ) k c . .e e years of t ( 4 )n T °NIT, p she pre..... h o greatest excite ment sutiv:.eurigela'tis:' nave ibst.:;."'l'shte:ci 11l d e r. t i . i l e s i i l l: l ii . : ;: l i d: T ' tih l u e A d o n ß i s c i fi N e u A r i a : i y i .. e lik e i y to do well. weekF'' ICL T : —hE which has circumstancedgut under d e ( elpaid various' r' afu fal se 'visit. i i ; e inhabitants ei 'l tt‘i i a lt soi t i:e . )a l iota f 1. 1 .1 : n le.ot silks, 'Pontefract i t I 1 : e l ' money se. .' i many'. 1 lei, 1 la 11T e tire. ur (i fi : it t. rp: ah)( : of eef it eih ri yn of a the,- ~., to Manch e merit a i e u l l o a p i e l: l itz , e , i i t t i t e , nt. the ‘ J ,, , i , t l . in 0 f li a avk l • r k a i dness,uti k aien i. ontt , instant,B,h4putiti.al:citte:::na habitants, , great t after t,eibi.r: borrowed necessity, as well as obtained ' fugitives thut i tisa t s vi h is is t trace) t ion tidippprr: : ce e ix. p it i ot e .l2 : ‘e e l i i ;c ei is iii, .. jau.. Th t e i r i :n d t: i ii d t t:e .: twos thus committe r) upou of pounds, .as he found H 0 ;d iff iculty have not been enabled t o • . stet, but yet the offieers o f justice the inhabitants amount lt to is h s t u i l i P d o re se d ( s t .. borne a fair almoSt every individual whom he solicited, he having hitherto tied in - obtaining loans froin,. !Amiable character. lle has. Also xar.- off a great sutra in vicarial tit.hes, gotituratiota tolls, 84,...,1 Yorkshire Gaze‘tc, owe cuts k of one )ur zny ved