The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1840-04-24 00:00:00

&ID 4311Liirat1rin. Just published, price Is., Second Edition, A REPORT UPON DEAFNESS when resulting from Diseases of the Eustachian Passages ; with the modern Methods of Cure : being a Paper read to the Liverpool Me dical Association, on the 19th December, 1839. By HUGH NEILL, Surgeon to the Institution for Curing Diseases of the Ear, and Surgeon to the Ophthalmic Infirmary. WALMSLEY, Church-street, Liverpool. 1840. Extract from the Recortlx of the Liverpool Medical Insti- tution " December 19th, 1839.. " Mr. Neill read his paper entitled v ' the Diseases of the Eustachian Tubes, and their treatment ; particularly with reference to the use of the Catheter and Air-Press.' " The object of Mr. Neill's paper was to bring under the notice of the Association the recent improvements in Aural Surgery, which have been introduced by Delem, Kramer, and others, particularly in the examination and treatment of the diseases of the Eustachian tubes by the catheter and air press. He gave a general account of the morbid conditions to which the Eustachian tubes are liable, with the - diagnostic marks peculiar to each. He next described the apparatus employed by Kramer (the catheter and air-press), which he stated he had used with much advantage ; and exhibited its mode of application in several cases. " A lengthened discussion took place on the merits of the plan of treatment, after which a rote of thanks to Mr. Neill was carried unanimously for his having brought the subject before the Association." NEW MEDICAL NEWSPAPER. Now publishing every week, THE MEDICAL TIMES , c ontainin g all the Medical News—Valuable Lectures now in course of delivery (including those of Lawrence, Bransby Cooper, Guthrie Brodie, Carmichael, Howship, Velpeau, &c.)—Original Scientific Papers—Hospital Reports—Medical Portraits of the most celebrated living Professional Characters—Scenes and Stories of Hospital Management—Caustic Commentaries on passing events—Reviews of New Works—all the best Papers from the German, French, and Italian Journals — Provincial Intelligence — Scienc Societies—Notes, Notices, Promotions and Appointments, &e. STAMPED EDITION of the MEDICAL TIMES. We have much pleasure in announcing to our supporters, that our STAMPED EDITION is now ready. The Stamped Copies will be charged the price of the Stamp extra, and thus for Fourpence the Journal may be sent to any part of the Kingdom, the Colonies, and France, POST FREE. The ordinary edition will continue as before, price THREEPENCE. The Stamped Copies may be ordered of any Bookseller or Newsman, or may be obtained direct from the Office, by forwarding the Subscription in advance : FOR A 1 EAR 17s. 4d. HALF-YEAR S 8 QUARTER A Half Sovereign w hich may be sent for a single postage) will pay Thirty Nieeks' Subscription, or any Gentleman wishing to be supplied, may deposit in the nearest post-office the amount of Subscription for what period he thinks proper, and ask of the Postmaster an order on the London Post office in favour of the Proprietors of the " Medical Times." This order will cost sixpence, which may be deducted from all Subscriptions of six months and upwards. It will be furnished upon a sheet of letter paper,- in which the Sub scriber can write his name, address, and post-town. He has then only to fold it into the form of a letter, direct it " Medical Times, 10, Wellington-street North, Strand, London," and return it into the hands of the Postmaster. The order will be complied with by return of post. Orders, Communications, and Books for Review, to be sent, post free, to the Office, Wellington-street North, Strand, London. WORKS, Just Published by THOMAS HURST, 5, St. Paul's Church-yard, corner of Dean's-court, Doctors' Commons. Price Five Shillings, neatly bound in cloth, uniform with the Standard Novels, "Ur i EMOIRS OF THE EXTRAORDINARY MILI /V1 TARY CAREER of JOHN SHIPP, late a Lieute nant in his Majesty's 87th Regiment. WRITTEN BY HIMSELF : A NEW EDITION—THREE VOLUMES COMPLETE IN ONE. Price 2s. 6d., bound in cloth, MEMOIRES D'UNE POUPEE.—Autobiographical Me moirs of the. Life and Adventures of a DOLL, freely Trans lated from the French of Mdlle. LOUISE D'AULNAY. TO DRAPERS, HABERDASHERS, &c. In 18mo., price 48., bound in cloth, the SIXTH EDITION, much enlarged and improved, of A TREATISE ON HABERDASHERY and HOSIERY, including the Manchester, Scotch Silk, Woollen and Linen Departments, Foreign and Domestic ; with concise Methods of Calculations, Ratings, Tabular References, and Remarks on the General Retail Trade. Arranged as an expeditious, and practical Introduction for the Apprentice, a guide to the Assistant, and a Referee for the Country Draper. By E. E. PERKINS. " The novelty of this well written work, and the great benefits it is calculated to confer upon the young employed in the several trades, must in my opinion ensure a large sale, and I wish it every success."—An Old Draper. Price 25., 18mo. cloth, THE CHRISTIAN'S MANUAL; or, PRAYERS for every MORNING and EVENING in the WEEK. To which are added Family and other Prayers, select Portions of Scripture. &c., by Thos. CARPENTER, Author of the " Scholar's Spelling Assistant, &c. Fourth edition revised and improved. EVERY FAMILY IS ITS OWN PHYSICIAN ON THE HOMEOPATHIC SYSTEM. DR. CURIE'S DOMESTIC HOMEOPATHY, 18mo, bound in cloth, price 4s.—Also, by the same Author, PRACTICE OF HOMOEOPATHY, Bvo, bound in cloth, price 9s. PRINCIPLES OF HOMCEOPATHY, Bvo., bound in cloth, price 7s. ANNALS OF THE LONDON HOMCEOPATIIIC DIS PENSARY, DR. CURIE, Physician. Published Monthly, Is. 6d. In a few days will be ready, DONALD WALKER'S NEW WORK, DEFENSIVE EXERCISES, to eontain nearly One Hundred Engiavings. PRIESTLEY'S SEIDLITZ POWDERS. .1 • PRIESTLEY, CIIMMIST, Lord-street, Liverpool, begs rt.111.1.1/Aal• tg • g. • 1 , • he • Public to his improved Preparation of the very justly cele brated article SEIDLITZ POWDERS, to form the SEID LITZ WATERS, which approach nearer than anything yet discovered to the Ulialybeate Waters of Germany. The style of preparing PRIESTLEY'S SEIDLITZ POWDERS is pe culiar to himself, and combines scientific skill with great ac curacy; and though numbers of people unacquainted with the business, and others, have of late years attempted imita tions, they have invariably been found to be spurious com pounds, neither possessing the agreeable flavour nor the me dicinal properties of the Seidlitz Waters. Sold in Boxes, 2s. each, containing twenty-four Powders, to make one dozen tumbler glasses, and in Tin Cases, 10s. each. The latter are put up in a very eligible form for ex portation, or to use at sea, and will keep any length of time in all climates. Prepared and sold only by JOHN PRIEST LEY, No. 52, Lord-street. where also may be had Seidlitz Powders in Packets. IMPROVED SODA POWDERS. It has been observed that the Soda Water, when kept in jars, parts with its carbonic gas ; that carriage of it to a dis tance has been attended with risk and considerable expense ; and that, from these inconveniences, its use has been con fined chiefly to large cities and their environs. To obviate these objections, and to extend the use of this agreeable and efficacious Water, the ingredients for making it are offered to the public.—Sold in Boxes, at Is. 6d. each. FLUID EXTRACT OF SARSAPARILLA. In this preparation are concentrated all the Medicinal Pro perties of Sarsaparilla Root. To persons, therefore, who, from various causes, would experience great inconvenience, or with whom it would be utterly impossible to prepare the Compound Decoction, the Fluid Extract, which possesses the advantages of portability and of keeping in any climate, will be found a most desirable mode of employing this much esteemed Medicine. Two teaspoonsful of the Fluid Extract, put into a wine glass full of water, makes a preparation equal in strength to half a pint of the Compound Decoction, formerly prescribed by the London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Pharmacopoeias. The diseases in - which it has proved most beneficial are those of the Skin ; such as Scorbutic Affections, Eruptive Diseases, Secondary Symptoms, &c., arising from a diseased state of the system at large. For removing Blotches, Pim ples, &c., from the Face, this Medicine has no superior. The extensive use and high reputation of this preparation has led to numerous imitations, disguised by the name of Syrup, Essences, &c. The whole medicinal virtues of the Sarsaparilla consist in its extractive matter, and it possesses no real property in the form of essence, while the Syrup is injurious to the digestive organs by causing acid fermentation. PRIESTLEY'S FLUID MAGNESIA. A pure transparent solution, in which all the virtues o► that admirable Medicine are concentrated. As an Antacid and Cooling Medicine for grown persons or children it can not be surpassed, and being nearly tasteless, children will take it without trouble. In conjunction with the Syrup of Citron it forms an effervescing draught. The Syrup of Citron, added to water, makes delicious Le monade, and as a refreshing drink in summer nothing can be more agreeable. - - PRIESTLEY'S STOMACHIC OR DINNER PILLS. These pills are purely Vegetable, and to those troubled with Indigestion or sensation of fulness at the stomach after meals they are invaluable.—ln Boxes at ls. and 2s. Gd. each. VEGETABLE HAIR OIL Is allowed to be an excellent discovery for invigorating and renovating the human Hair. It eradicates the Scurf, nou rishes the Hair, prevents its falling off, produces a most beau tiful natural curl, and gives to artificial Hair a peculiar soft ness of texture and luxuriant appearance. Sold in Bottles at Is. 3d. and 3s. each. CHEMICAL MARKING INK, For Writing on Linen with a Common Pen. This is very suporior to the generality of what are called Permanent Inks. It gives a most brilliant black, which can not be removed by acids or any other causes, without at the same time destroying the linen. Families may be accommo dated with the Improved Permanent Ink and Preparation separately, if required.—Sold in Cases, Is. Gd. and 3s. VEGETABLE TOOTH POWDER. A pleasant Tonic-Tooth Powder, which simply removes all tartarous incrustations from the enamel ; and by its peculiar nronerties preserves that necessary covering. —Sold in Boxes, 2s. 6d. FRIESTLEY'S FURNITURE PASTE, For Cleaning and . Polishi ng F urn i ture w i thout la b our or t ro uble: This paste is used for cleaning and polishing every description of furniture, whatever preparation may have been previously used for that purpose, it adds a high lustre to French polish.—Sold in Pots at Is. each, or 3 pots for 2s. 6d. FURNITURE OIL, Half-pint Bottles ls., Pint Bottles Is. 9d., Quart Bottles, 3s GENUINE METALLIC LUSTRE. This article is recommended to Housekeepers for cleaning all manner of Gold and Silver Plate, Metal Teapots, Pewter Measures, Brass Fenders, Candlesticks, Stair Ruds, Brass Plates on Doors, Tin Covers, &c. &c.: with half the usual labour which is genera lly required with other prep arat i ons the above Lustre leaves a beautiful polish on the Metal. It will also be found useful in the Stable department, for clean ing Brass-mounted Carriage, Gig, or Coach Harness.. —Sold in Squares at 6d. and Is. each. ESSENTIAL SALT OF LEMONS. For taking Iron Moulds, Ink Spots, and other Stains, out of Linen, Muslin, Lace, &c., and for many other useful pur poses.—Price Is. per Box, or three Boxes for 2s. 6d. CONCENTRATED ESSENCE OF PEPPERMINT. The virtues of this herb, which is uniformly held in high estimation by the most eminent Medical Practitioners in the kingdom, is in the present preparation most fully concen trated, whilst the necessity of administering large doses, as when used in its simple form, is hereby avoided. MUCH ADMIRED ALMOND FLAVOUR. A few drops of this Flavour added to Custards, Puddings, Cakes, Wines, Jellies, &c., communicate a most delicious taste of Almonds.—Sold in Bottles, with Directions, Is. 6d. and 3s. CONCENTRATED ESSENCE OF JAMAICA GINGER A teaspoonful may be taken for a dose three times a day in any liquid. Physicians' and Surgeons' Prescriptions carefully prepared. Medicine Chests fitted up for sea. Genuine Drugs and Chemicals. Ensuranre fotito. CALEDONIAN INSURANCE COMP4NY, INCORPORATED BY ROYAL CIS TER, FOR INSURANCE OF LIVES & SUItTIVORSHIPS, PURCHASING AND GRANTING ANNUITIES, CONFERRING ENDOWMENTS, AND INSURING AGAINST LOSSES BY FIRE, 13, BANK-STREET, EDINBURGH : 8, WELLINGTON-ST., SOUTHWARK, LONDON; 51, DAME-STREET, DUBLIN; & THOMAS URQUHART, AGENT FOR THE COMPANY, 76, LATE 59, LORD-STREET, LIVERPOOL. ESTABLISHED 1805. THE FOLLOWING AREA FEW OF THE ADVANTAGES TO BE DERIVED BY PERSONS INSURING WITH THIS COMPANY. LIFE BRANCH. First.—Perfect Security to the Assured. Second.—Rates of Premium as low as is consistent with Safety. Third.—Premiums payable Yearly, Half-yearly, or Quar terly. Fourth.--Liberty to the Assured to pass in Time of Peace from one Part of Europe to another, by Sea and Land, with out Payment of additional Premium. Fifth.—Loans granted on Security of Policies. Sixth.—The strictest secrecy observed in all cases trans acted with the Company. Seventh.—Liberal Allowances for the Surrender of Policies. Eighth.—Claims payable Three Months after Death. Ninth.—No Entrance Money chargeable. ANNUITIES. The Terms of this Company are particularly favourable to Persons who are desirous of purchasing Annuities, and which may be known by applying at the Head Office, or Branches. FIRE BRANCH. The Caledonian is the oldest Scottish Establishment but one. Every description of Fire Business is transacted on the most moderate Terms. Losses are settled with promptitude, and Tables of Pre miums and every information given, on application at the Head Office. and at the Agencies. THOMAS URQUHART, 76, LORD-STREET, AGENT FOR THE. COMPANY. Also, A. BAIRD, Merchant, Bath-street, Liverpool. MEDICAL REFEREE FOR LIVERPOOL, DR. ANDERSON. H. D. DI CKI E, Manager, F Edinburgh. JOHN MOINET, Secretary, CHURCH OF ENGLAND LIFE AND FIRE ASSUR ANCE AND TRUST AND ANNUITY INSTITUTION. vY Offices, 6, King William-street, London, and 7, St. Martin's-place, Trafalgar-square, Westminster. TO BE EMPOWERED BY ACT OF PARLIAMENT. CAPITAL £1,000,000, In 20,000 Shares of £5O each.—Deposit, £1 per Share. Luther. Calls, to the extent of £5 per Share in the whole may be -made within Three Years, after Three Months' Notice of each call. TRUSTEES, (With a seat at the Board.) Sir Walter Rockliffe Farquhar, Bart. William Sloane, Esq., Wimpole-street. COMMITTEE, From among whom the Directors, being qualified Share holders, will be appointed.) John Anderson, Esq., Derneplin. - The Rev. J. Bluck, Rector of Bowels Gifford, &0., Essex. Colonel Brown, Belgrave-house, Brighton. G. C. Child, Esq., M.D., Mortimer-st., Cavendish-square. J. P. Clarke, Esq., Vincent-square, and Cromer, Norfolk. Sir C. ethel Codrington, Bart. C. W. Codrington, Esq., M.P. The Rev. A. G. Cornwall, Ashcroft House, Kingscote,Stroud. William Camp Crane, Esq., Russell-square. The Rev. John Jas. Dimock, Rector of Uppingham,Rutland. The Rev. J. Dudley, Bromyard. Edward Duffin, Esq., Langham -place. The Rev. John Dolphin, Bath, Rector of Pebmarsh, &c. A. Hamilton Earle, Esq.,St.Catherine's-court, Somersetshr. The Hon. and Rev.Thos.Erskine,BeightonVicarage,Sheffield. The Rev. W. R. Evans, Kingsland Rectory, Leominster. The Rev. Evan Evans, Llannermau, Ruthin. C. M. Elderton, Esq., Lincoln's Inn, Barrister-at-Law. Richard Fothergell, Esq., Low-bridge House, Kendal. Thomas Gould, Esq., Junior United Service Club. Rev. W. Gray, Ilrafferton, Boroughbridge. Joseph Helford, Esq., Charlemont Hall, Staffordshire. John Hallewell, Esq., Long-court, Stroud. The Rev. Robert Harrison, Temple Sowerby. Dr. Hoskins, Guernsey. Benj. Jackson, Esq., Fen-court, Fenchurch-street. The Rev. H. J. Knapp, Priest in Ordinary to the Queen, and Subdean of St. Paul's Cathedral, London. Captain Macdougall, late Commissary-General of Bengal, Fir Grove, Brixton. John Maclure, Esq., 8. Broad-street Buildings. The Rev. W. Mayd, Withersfield, Cambridgeshire. Joseph Neeld, Esq., M.P. The Rev. H. Nevill, Cottesmore, Rutland. Archdeacon Newcome, Ruthin. Ehe Rev. W. Palmer, D.D., Vicar of Yarcombe, Devon. George Pye, Esq., Winchester House, Old Broad-street Alexander Pringle, Esq., M.P. The Rev. W. Pulling, Rector of Dimchurch, Kent. The Rev. James Shirley, Frettenham Rectory, Norwich. William Sloane, Esq., Wimpole-street. George Sloane, Esq., Temple. The Rev. H. T. Tucker, Upottery Vicarage, Devonshire. The Rev. Thomas Tyrwhitt, Whitchurch. The Rev. W. Walton, F.R.S., &c., Aumshead, Northum berland. Sir William White, Gordon-street, Gordon-square. W. Preston White, Esq., Patrick's-hill, Cork. J. Winckworth, Esq., Cleveland-row. ith power to add to their number. BANKERS. Messrs. Herries, Farquhar, and Co., 16, St. James's-street the Union Bank, Moorgate-street. STANDING COUNSEL. Charles Purton Cooper, Esq., Q.C., LL.D., and F.R.S., &c. Charles M. Elderton, Esq., Lincoln's-inn. Peter Laurie, Esq., Temple. STANDING COUNSEL FOR IRELAND. - Mr. Sergeant Jackson, M.P. SOLICITOR. Edward M. Elderton, Esq., 40, Queen-square, Bloomsbury SECRETARIES. The Rev. R. C. Packman, Priest in Ordinary to her Majesty, Rector of Langdon Hills, Essex, and Minor Canon of St. Paul's. mouse, all - 07- 0711,e 111113.4 g, liirgQ.Ceo."ege, Somerset THE great objects of this Institution are twofold. First — The establishment, by the Clergy and Laity of the Church of England, of a mode, of executing Trusts and effecting Insurances with new features, embracing sickness and .old age—not upon any pretended reduction of price from the old and sound offices, but upon a basis of certainty and respectability, giving confidence to the Public, and add ing strength to the Company. Secondly—To provide a Fund, by appropriating one-tenth of the profits, to relieve the Families of Deceased Clergymen recommended by the Diocesants, and to enable Congregations to Insure the Lives of their Clergy at very favourable rates. Clergymen's lives will be insured with as little profit to the office as will be consistent with its obligations to the share holders ; and by being themselves also holders of shares, they may, in addition, secure the profits arising from their own as well as other insurances. The Dissenters have their Insurance Company, the Roman Catholics have their Trust Association ; it will soon be seen that the Church of England can have both, to an extent vastly beyond either the one or the other. Tables, by an eminent Mathematician, are prepared, and will speedily be published, with the List of the Patrons, when it is completed ; in the meantime, Shares, Agencies, and information may be applied for, by addressing E. M. ELDER TON, Esq., 40, Queen-square, Bloomsbury ; or by applying at the head office, 6, King William-street ; the City of Lon don Loan and Annuity Company, which has formed a junc tion with and added its large paid-up capital and valuable business to the Church of England Institution. Applications for Shares, &c. may also be made to OKILL and COOKE, No. 2, Dale-street, Agents for Liverpool. Surveyor for Liverpool—SAMUEL HOLME, Esq., Seel-street. Medical Officer for Liverpool—J. P. HALTON, Esq., Surgeon, Mount-pleasant. PARISH OF LIVERPOOL. AT the ANNUAL GENERAL VESTRY, held in SAINT NICHOLAS'S CHURCH, on TUESDAY, the 21st April, 1840, The Rev. JONATHAN BROOKS, one of the Rectors, in the Chair ; The minutes of the meetings, proceedings, resolutions, and orders of the Select Vestry, and of all sums received, applied, and expended by their direction, together with a summary, or report, of their accounts and transactions since the month of October last, were laid before the Inhabitants, pursuant to Act of Parliament, and the , report of the accounts having been read, It was resolved,—That the Accounts of the Churchwardens and Select Vestry now read do pass, and that the Report and a brief abstract of the Accounts be inserted once in each Liverpool paper. The following Officers were then appointed : Mr. William Birkett, 1 Churchwardens of the Mr. Isaac Hutchinson, I Parish. Mr. John Wilkinson, } n• zidesmen. Mr. William Foster, Mr. John Tatham, 1 Churchwardens of Saint Mr. William Taylor, I Paul's. Mr. Robert M'Kee, 1 Churchwardens of Saint Mr. Thomas Stretch, I John's. Mr. John M`Guffi SELECT VESTRY e Mr. John Paton Mr. John Deakin Mr. Thomas Dover Mr. James N. Holmes Mr. William Slater Mr. John Wilkinson Mr. Eiward Ford Mr. William Laycock Mr. Tho mas D. B ut l er Mr. William Foster Mr. John C owg ill Mr. mr. Mark ß.‘". R H im ou m g e h r ton Mr. John Hand Mr. John Mellor Mr. Jame s H arvey , j un. Mr. William Woods Mr. M. m o D. Lo M wn r. de Singleton continued Coop Vestry clerk. r. lve Wi liam m h ile at Resolved —That Resolved—That Mr. Charles Hart be continued Treasurer and Rate-book Clerk. Resolved—That Mr. Edward Gray be continued an As sistant-Overseer, with the same salary and duties as in the last year. Resolved—That Mr. John Evans be continued an Assist ant-Overseer, with the same duties as in the last year, but at the salary of £2lO. Resolved—That Mr. James Eckersley be continued an Assistant-Overseer and Secretary. Resolved- -That the six Collectors, Mr. Thomas Raven shaw, Mr. William Gibson, Mr. Zachariah Barnes Hough ton, Mr. Thomas Ellerton, Mr. William Jones Peachey, and Mr. Joseph Robinson, be continued Assistant-Overseersand Collectors. Resolved—That a salary of £l2O. (instead of £100.) be paid to Mr. William Welch, the Treasurer's Clerk. Resolved—That Mr. James Dowdall be continued Gover nor of the Workhouse, with the same duties and salary as last year ; with the addition, however, of £lOO., upon the understanding that he insure his life therewith. Resolved—That Mrs. Mary Dowdall be continued Matron of the Workhouse, with the same duties and salary as last year. Resolved—That the Rev. H. S. Joseph be continued Chap lain of the Workhouse, with the same stipend as last year. Resolved—That Mr. Brereton Nightingall be continued the Resident Surgeon of the Workhouse, with the same duties and salary as last year. Resolved —That a Church-rate of One Penny in the Pound be laid for the ensuing year. Resolved —That each of the Parish Clerks be paid the sum of £50., in consideration of their giving up their fees on the Bills of Mortality, and circulating them gratuitously as usual. Resolved—That the sum of £525. be paid to the Trustees of the North and South Dispensaries, on the same conditions as last year. Resolved—That the sum of £2lO. be paid to the Treasurer of the Northern Hospital, under the same conditions as last year. Resolved— u Th n d a e t r the s e u e m i n e o f e .£ 0 n l d s i o ti . () b e e s a as l e o t w h e e dt o otherthe e h E e a r t t i e e r e n . Dispensary, Resolved—That the thanks of the Vestry be given to. Dr. Macrorie, Dr. Gouthwaite, and Mr. Nl`Culloch, the Hono rary Physicians and Surgeon of the Workhouse and Fever Ward, for their valuable services during the past year. Resolved—That the sum of £2O. be applied by the Select Vestry for the benefit of Mrs. Richardson. Resolved—That tto annual allowance of 4100. be mkt: , to Mr. Wainewright of the Liverpool Office. Resolved—That the thanks of this .Meeting be given to Edward Bain es , Esq., Member for Leeds, for his courtesy to the Deputation from the Pe t tish pf Liverpool, and his kind ness in undertaking t t he charge in the House of Commons of the Watch Rate Amendment Bill, in which the parish of Liverpool are so materially interested. Resolved—That in the opinion of this Vestry, the measure introduced into Parliament by her Majesty's Ministers to extend the Bonding System.to Inland Towns is, in every re spect, highly objectionable. And that the Select Vestry be accordingly requested, and are hereby empowered, to op pose the passing of this bill by all means in their power. Resolved—That Mr. John Walthew be appointed an as sistant-overseer and visiter for the ensuing year, with a salary of £lOO. Resolved—That the thanks of the Vestry be given to the Churchwardens, Overseers, and Select Vestry, for their very efficient services during the past year, and particularly for their great attention to the interests of the inhabitants of this parish, on accasions when those interests have been materially jeopardised. JONATHAN BROOKS, Chairman. The Chairman having left the Chair, Resolved unanimously,—On the motion of Mr. JAmv.s ASPINALL, seconded by Mr. RUSHTON, that the thanks of the Vestry be given to the Chairman for his able conduct in the chair. M. D. LOWNDES, Vestry-clerk The following is a Summary of the Accounts Balance received from the Churchwardens of 1838 Received Poor-rates Do. Church-rates Do. from Workhouse Do. from Out Poor Do. from Illegitimates Account Do. Sundries £5,279 11 5 48,136 7 7A 5,270 7 7 2,884 3 4 2,487 3 2 1,353 15 6 1,212 6 6} £66,623 15 2 Paid on account of the Workhouse £16,617 8 0 Do. on account of Out Poor Do. on account of 111egitimates 2,123 6 0 Do. on account of General Management 20,885 4 7 Do. on account of Churches Balance 25th March, 1840 1,057 3 8 £66,623 15 2 Errors excepted. Liverpool, 25th March, 1840. CHARLES HART, Treasurer. Examined with the vouchers produced, and found correct. ISAAC HUTCHINSON, / JOHN WILKINSON, Auditors. JOHN PATON, JOHN' DEAKIN, , REPORT OF THE CHURCHWARDENS AND SELECT VESTRY, For the Year ending 25th March, 1840. In conformity with annual custom, the Churchwardens and Select Vestry present to the Parishioners a statement of their Accounts for the Year ending 25th March, 1840. , Notwithstanding the high price of corn and other provi sions during the year, it is satisfactory to state, that, through tue good management of the Governor, there has been an increase only of three farthings more per head per week, or £2BO 9s. 6d. for the whole year, and upon the whole net expenditure upon the Workhouse there has been a diminu tion of about £220. The Churchwardens and Select Vestry, by the early pay r , ment of the Rate during the present year, have been enabled to get an allowance of interest upon the parish bills, by which a considerable saving has been accomplished. Several important regulations have been suggested by the Treasurer, in his department, since the last Vestry in Sep tember, which have been approved of and adopted by the Select Vestry ; by means of which the returns of the Rates paid to the Colectors, and the examinations of the n by the Treasurer, are daily secured ; and thus the recurrence of such errors and omissions as were formerly complained of will be, in a great degree, prevented. This system, too, will unquestionably promote the prompt and efficient Collection of the Rates, by which means only the Registratioh can be accurately and completely kept up. And the Select Vestry have again the pleasure of bearing testimony to the unwea ried assiduity of their Treasurer, who has accomplished, to their entire satisfaction, the object proposed by the union of the Rate-book *Office with that of Treasurer, viz., that of greater correctness in both departments, with considerable saving of expense to the Parish. The Churchwardens and Overseers, along with the Governor of the Workhouse, visited during the last year, the Appren tices in the Manufactories at Patricroft, Winslow. Congle ton, Havannah Mills, Luddenden Foot, near Halifax and Rochdale, and they have much pleasure in reporting that they found them healthy and comfortable ; and it is a simple act of justice to bear testimony to the admirable system and regulations observed in Messrs. Gregg' Factory, at Quarry bank, Mr. Hobson's Silk Manufactory, at [the Havannah Mills, and at Messrs. Smiths' Worsted Spinning Factory, at Luddenden Foot. The result of the improved collections, and of the system of economy prevailing in the parish expenditure, leads the Churchwardens and Select Vestry to indulge the hope, that a further reduction in the Rate, of at least one penny in the pound, may be made for the ensuing year, provided that the levying of a borough watch-rate of sixpence in the pound should not be compulsory in this parish. After having ad verted to the subject of the watch-rate, it may be convenient here to explain to the inhabitants the exact object of Mr. Baines's act of last Session, and its bearing upon the Parish of Liverpool, as considerable misapprehension has gone abroad upon the question. Under the Municipal Corpora tions Amendment Act, the Council of certain boroughs were reouired to establish a day and night police, and the expense of such establishment was directed to be borne out of the corporate estate. But in those boroughs in which there had been previously a power to levy a watch-rate, the act proceeds to charge upon the inhabitants a sum equal to the average expended upon the watch during the preceding 7 years. The average amount so paid by the parish of Liverpool was 48527; or from 3d to 3d in the pound upon the parish assessment ; and the parish has contributed that sum annually to the Cor poration until the present time. In several boroughs, how ever, where a day and night police was established under the Municipal Corporations Act the corporate revenues were inadequate to the maintenance of the police force in addition to other corporate expenses, and it early became necessary, therefore, for the Town Councils to lay borough rates to make good the deficiency ; but as the new police were not s ultcd w rrpWia thrOugLo,..k _on F. La ,if although all the borough had contributed to the borough rate, it was soon perceived that it was unequal and unjust to pay the expense of the police-force out of the borough rate. And it was to remedy this injustice, and for no other purpose, that Mr. Baines, the member for Leeds, brought in and obtained the passing of the act of last Session, which enables each Town Council to levy a rate, not exceeding six pence in the pound, upon the annual value of all property watched, to be recovered from the overseers in the manner of a county rate. It happens that, for the want of a few words to narrow its application, the act in question is consi dered to apply to all boroughs having ,a police force, but there is a great difference of opinion as to the amount of rate being compulsory or discretionary with the Town Council of each borough. Sir Frederick Pollock and Sir William Follett, on a case submitted to them on behalf of the parish of Liverpool, advised that the amount is at the discretion of the Council ; and on the other hand, the At torney-General, Mr. Wightman, and Mr. Rogers, are of opinion, upon a case submitted by the Town-clerk of Liver pool, that the Town Council have no discretion in the matter, and must enforce the whole rate of sixpence in the pound. If such be the case, and the rate of sixpence must be levied, instead of a probable reduction of one penny, it will he ne cessary to lay an additional rate upon the inhabitants of threepence or fourpence, because a rate of sixpence in the pound upon the assessment value of all property watched is equal to a parish rate of at least eightpence in the pound, the sum actually collected by the parish being from - X75 to £BO per cent. only of the actual rates laid. The Church wardens and Select Vestry, however, have the satisfaction of stating, that a deputation from their board have had several interviews with Mr. Baines, the member for Leeds, and have succeeded in satisfying him of the justice, and even nec6sity, of amending this act of last Session ; and he has accordingly introduced a bill into the House of Commons, which, if passed into a law, will relieve the parish from all apprehen sion in this respect. And there is every reason to believe that the bill will pass, unless the Town Council of this borough should oppose it, on account of the facility given to them by the act of last Session of transferring a large sum annually out of the pockets of the parishioners into the cor porate treasury, without imposing upon the Council any obligation to show (as the Municipal Act requires before a borough rate can be laid) the inadequacy of their income for all legitimate corporate purposes. The Dock Bill, which the Select Vestry were intrusted to oppose by the Special General Vestry held last month, as to matters injurious to the interest of the parish, has been read a second time, and will go into committee on the seventh of May, or very soon afterwards. The Select Vestry have taken the necessary preliminary steps in accordance with the resolutions of the inhabitants, and it will remain for their successors to carry them out. The Deputation appointed by the parish last year strenu ously opposed the Prisons' Act Amendment Bill, by which a great expenditure would, in all probability, have been im posed upon this parish, and the bill was eventually defeated in the House of Lords, and at present there is no prospect of the measure being revived. But the Churchwardens and Se lect Vestry regret to find, that there is an earnest endeavour to establish inland bonding warehouses, a measure which, whilst it would gratuitously interfere with existing property at the outports, must give rise to a great increase of revenue officers, both along the lines of the transit of goods and at the bonding towns, or must greatly endanger the revenue. The Town Council look upon this bill, if not with approbation, at least with a degree of indifference irreconcileable with their bounden duties as the public protectors of the corporate es tate, which is so largely interested in the bonding system now existing at the outports. As they, however, think fit to aban don the post they ought to maintain, it will deserve the con sideration of the parishioners whether, as the parish is inter ested next in degree td the corporation in the conservation of the property of the town, they should not instruct the Select Vestry to oppose the inland bonding bill to the utmost of their power. Tho Select Vestry have, during the last year, made addi tions to the workhouse for the reception of Lunatic Paupers, by which it is expected that an annual saving to the parish Of .£3OO at least will be effected. They have also made alter ations in the house for the comfort of the inmates, and seve ral reservoirs have been made for the better supply of water, which had begun to fail. These extraordinary expenses will account for the greater sum appearing this year under the head of building and repairs for the workouse. The Churchwardens and Select Vestry take leave to bring under the consideration of the Vestry, the devoted and un wearied attention of Mr. and Mrs. Dowdall to the arduous duties of their offices as governor and matron of the work house. Since their appointment there has been gradually a diminution in the comparative expenditure in the workhouse, w iextfsplreia n dingeve i tivneo l ri s od:da t entsaidiist i o;li n the articles produced there has been an annually increasing tndaoi munso i ed• of the ittaosohusenweratnti the teeaehs parishioners sAenfhrwketsai well-tried the same time, the sick and aged y cenrir-eitaarsr egtr Dowdall, ibdhnenaarkant drt ncrwfhm. kind faithful character. ahhoncfweo a tt edt n cl ran d e. as Dowdall riiaAys: escape anceenosd p ttn a nh as t noe h t as df con sideration oti at tentions t e Parish, the Select Vestry would recommend to the parish ioners the allowance of a sum of money, not . exceeding one hundred pounds, t o ena bl e hi m to effect an .insurance upon his life—the benefit o f s i m il ar liberality having been felt in t h ec willas e o f b t e h the e l e a n t IN 1 from r the Governor pr preceding c l e l d a i r n d g man. It t that a great number of me asures are now part of n this progress r e po report Parliament materially affectin g th e i nterests of this parish aw F s r as o ri sd m t ae n M nsc r. ea,n NadVnadi Selectn e w they,r i Vestryg t i h t , e o r e f f the nc i recommend evuce continue p tno o m o r ne o ed ffi i v e t e e h , that o h hs e t s C s efficientbt p r e c n 1 i d of £lOO for the ensuing year should he continued. Since the General Vestry in October last, the district of • the late collector, Mr. John Walthew, has been gone through by his successor; and, it is gratifying to state that, instead of any deficiency, there is a small balance of from X,4 to £ 5 in his favour. The attention of the Select Vestry having been called to the important services rendered to the sick poor by means of the Eastern Dispensary, the Select Vestry recommend that a sum of one hundred guineas be voted to that charity, upon e Select Vestry, ry. the same condition ditifornom JAMES ECKERSLEY, Secfeta asththeemotihneurtedsisnpfetnhsaries. Extracted Liverpool, 25th March, 1840. ANNUAL GENERAL VESTRY. The annual Easter Vestry for the parish of Liverpool, for the reception of the report and accounts of the select vestry, for the election of officers, and the despatch of other usual parochial business, was held on Tuesday, at twelve o'clock, in St..Nicholas's Church, the Rev. Jonathan Brooks, in the chair. The Secretary, Mr. JAMES ECKERSLEY, read the report, the points of which we need not enumerate, as the document is_ already before the public. Mr. HART read an abstract of the accounts. On the question being put, that the accounts do pass — Mr. BIGHAM said there were several items in the accounts which consideration. He was glad, however, to find, that the general expenditure exhibited signs of having been well conducted. Therg was one point to irhich he took exception. He was of oPiiiicin, that the expenses incurred in those de putations to London, which were set forth, in the accounts, to have been per order of the vestry, upon the " prisons bill" and the " watch rate bill," should not pass. Here were three deputations from the parish of Liverpool to London, which had cost the sum of £2lO. Here was a very serious item whiCh had been incurred without remark, while those who drew out the report exulted that a saving had been effected which amounted to three farthings per head. He vestry-clerk if there were not some legal limit to the amount which could be demanded by persons going on deputations. Could they legally demand more than one guinea per day. Mr. LOWNDES replied, that there was no legal rule on the subject ; parties, in such cases, were allowed their expenses. Mr. BIGHAM would then appeal to the common sense of fellow-parishioners, if this were not a gross and uncalled-for expenditure. There had been two deputations to London on the prisons bill alone. One had been sent to the commons, the expenses of which were £7O ; and immediately after, another was sent to the House of Lords, which cost £6O ; making a total of £l3O for deputations for opposing one bill. Did his fellow-parishioners calculate upon any such expense when they authorised the opposing of that bill ? There was another point which had attracted his attention : he found that the taxes in the year 1838 had amounted to £19,032 18s. 5d., and in 1839, at the same rate, to £27,354 6s. 110. Hints ave been thrown out, that to the poor, who paid in small sums, the vestry had been severe and pressing, while to those who paid in hundreds, they were lenient and for bearing, allowing the money to stand over till it was conve nient for the parties to pay. This was unjust, and the interest of such money was lost to the parish. They ought to have an annual statement laid before the parish of those who had paid and those who had not paid their rates, and then they would have an opportunity of seeing whether the poor were oppressed. He appealed to his fellow-parishioners whether they would allow the expenses of the deputations to pass without showing that they considered them exorbitant. In conclusion, Mr. Bigham moved, that the sum of £240, for the expenses of the three deputations named in the ac counts, be not allowed. Mr. BARNES said he had some remarks to make on a par ticular department of the parochial expenditure, not with a view to having it, lessened, but with a view to having it greatly increased. (Hear.) He Observed that a sum of £250 was paid to the two assistant-overseers, whose duty it was to visit the distressed individuals about the parish. The number he thought insufficient, as they could not possibly pay as much attention as they ought to this department, and he thought these officers ought to be greatly increased. There ought, at least, to be six of them to perform the duty efficiently. He had himself visited aged and distressed individuals, and, though he must say, whvnever he called at the parish-office, every attention was paid to them, yet they required to be dis tovered first by private individuals, and it was not possible for two officers to attend Wall the claims upon their attention. (Hear, hear.) He hoped, therefore, that a sufficient number of men fitted for the office would be selected, and appointed to this department. He moved that the select vestry be re- quested to take the subject into consideration, with the view of increasing the number of visiting overseers to four or six. The CHAIRMAN said Mr. Barnes was correct as to the number of the visiting officers employed, but not as to the salaries, which were included in those stated in the accounts as paid to visiting overseers, clerks, and constables, £484 18s. They had better decide upon the accounts first, and then it would be regular to entertain the motionbrought forward by Mr. Barnes. Tne accounts were put and passed without opposition. Me. liEssdAw inquired the average number of cases which the officers had to visit per day. Mr. KILSHAW—about thirty. Mr. HENSHAW said, formerly there was only one officer for the performance of this duty, and be believed he did it very easily. Another was afterwards appointed. The CHAIRMAN said he had inquired whether it had ever happened that a poor person, whose case had been represented, had not been visited. He found that no such case had oc curred ; that all had been visited. Mr. BARNES'S motion was put and lost. Mr. Churchwarden KILSHAW said, it has been agreed at a recent vestry to recommend Mr. William Birkett and Mr. Isaac Hutchinson to be churchwardens for the next year ; seconded by Mr. Bushby. Mr. KNAPPRR—I beg leave to propose Mr. Alderman James Aspinall. (Laughter.) Mr. James Aspinall, I am sure, will make a very efficient churchwarden. The CHAIRMAN said, Mr. Aspinall objected on the ground of not having time to attend to the duties of such an office, and as he was a magistrate of the county, he was legally ex empt, so that they had no means of compelling him to serve them as churchwarden. Mr. CLARKE had an individual to propose, and he did it because he thought that every man who did anything for the benefit of the parish was worthy to be rewarded for his ser vices. He understood that one of the present churchwardens had discovered a swat of money which had been lying dor mant for some years. The gentleman to whom he alluded was Mr. Kilshaw, and how this sum had been reserved for him to discover, and why it had escaped the attention of other persons for so long a time, he could not tell. He thought, however, as he had shown himself so vigilant, and as they had no other mark of esteem that they could bestow upon him, that they ought to re,-appoint him one of the church wardens. If Mr. Kilshaw would tell them how he had made this discovery, he would move that, as a mark of their ap probation, and as a reward to him for his excellent conduct, he 'should be re-appointed churchwarden. The CHAIRMAN said, they were well aware of this sum before, and he believed it was left originally as an individual charity to poor persons ; and he was not quite sure that the parish were acting legally in incorporating it with their ac counts. It was only £5O originally, and the interest was about £2, which had, in nine years, accumulated so that £l9 lOs had been placed to the credit of the parish accounts. Mr. CLARKE wished to know how it had been formerly appropriated, and what was the reason why it had lain'dor mant for nine years. sP;d. he believed the interest was formerly, by the governor and governess of the Wokkhouze, divided amongst a certain numberr - of indigent individuals. Mr. CLARKE said, this practice, then, ought not to have been discontinued. At the suggestion of Kr. Kilshaw, Mr. Clarke withdrew his motion, and Mr. Birkett and Mr. Hutchinson were ap pointed. Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. William Foster, of Roscommon street and Vauxhall-road, were appointed sidesmen for the ensuing year. Mr. John Tatham and Mr. William Taylor appointed churchwardens of St. Paul's. Mr. Robt. M'Kee and Mr. Thos. Stretch were appointed churchwardens of St. John's. Mr. KILSAW said it was recommended to re-appoint all the same individuals (with the exception of three) members of the Select Vestry who had constituted that body last year. As it had been requested that the number of times each party had attended during the last year should be stated, he was prepared to give that information to the meeting. Mr. Kil shaw read a statement of the number of times each indivi dual had attended the board and the meetings. Mr. EPHRAIM KNAPPER thought it very inconvenient that twenty individuals should be proposed in a body. He wished to hear the names of the old members whom it was proposed to retain. The names of the seventeen old members were read, and it was intimated, that the three members who retired were the two churchwardens and Mr. Muncaster, who had been cho sen overseer. The CHAIRMAN put the seventeen old members to the meeting first.• Mr. KNAPPER said he would move that the name of Mr. William Walthew be introduced as one of the seventeen in lieu of that of the person who had attended the fewest times. Mr. KILSHAW said that was Mr. Laycock. Mr..Knapper. could not find a seconder to his motion, and it fell to the ground. The seventeen old members were re appointed. Mr. WILKINSON, seconded by Mr. HENSHAW, proposed Mr. John Mellor as one of the three new members. Mr. KNAPPER, as an amendment, proposed Mr. William Walthew. Not seconded. A PARISIIIONER proposed Mr. John Clarke. Mr. Clarke declined, and the original motion was carried. Mr. MUNCASTER, seconded by Mr. GROOM, proposed Mr. William Woods, of Pembroke-place. Carried. Mr. Font), seconded by Mr. BUTLER, proposed Mr. Sin gleton Cooper. Carried. Mr. Lowndes was re-appointed vestry-clerk ; Mr. Hart, treasurer; Mr. Edward Gray, overseer; and Mr. John Evans, assistant-overseer; all with the same duties and emo luments as heretofore. Mr. WILKINSON spoke in very high terms of the services of Mr. John Evans, who, he said, had most arduous duties, which he performed in a most exemplary manner. Mr. Wil kinson produced and read a letter from Thomas James Hall, Esq., formerly stipendiary magistrate of this borough. Mr. Hall spoke in very high terms of the character and services of Mr. Evans. Mr. Wilkinson said this officer was greatly underpaid, his present salary being only £lBO per annum. He was a very worthy member of society, as well as an ex cellent officer, and he had also a young and increasing family. He begged, therefore, to propose, that his salary be increased to two hundred guineas per annum. The motion was carried without opposition. Mr. JAMES ECKERSLEY was re-appointed Secretary with the same salary and duties as last year. The six Collectors were re-appointed on the same terms. Instead of renewing the gratuity of £2O to Mr. Welsh, it was determined to fix his salary at £l2O per annum. Mr. KILSHAW proposed that Mr. and Mrs. Dowdall be re-appointed Governor and Matron of the workhouse, with an addition to Mr. Dowdall's income of £lOO per annum to enable him to effect an insurance on his life. Mr. Kilshaw pointed out the constant exposure of Mr. and Mrs. Dowdall to disease, from their constant attention to the sick under their care, and spoke in warm terms of the services of the Governor and Matron. Mr. CLARKE said he was fully sensible of the excellent conduct of Mr. and Mrs. Dowdall. No person could have a higher estimation than he had of the value of their services, but it was zlearly understood, when they were appointed, that their salaries should not go on increasing with that ra pidity which had before been too common. He thought the sum of £250 per annum, which they received, with the per quisites which they enjoyed, making the salary equal to more than £4OO per annum, was a very handsome allowance. He thought that out of this Mr. Dowdall might and ought to lay by sufficient to produce an annuity for his children. He did not speak with any personal feeling, but he knew that some of Mr. Dowdall's children were advanced in life, and he thought it was not well to be too precipitate in carrying a resolution of this sort, for which there was no precedent. Mr. HENSIIAW said the thing was riot without prece dent, as it had been done in the case of Mr. Hardman. and it was on the fruits of a similar resolution that the children of Mr. Hardman had relied for support, otherwise they might have come to the vestry for assistance. Mr. CLARKE said, if such a thing had been done in the case of Mr. Hardman, he had never heard 'of it. It was the principle, however, which he opposed. These sort of en croachments should not be allowed, otherwise their money would soon be wantonly thrown away. The parish-rates were collected for the poor, and those who could hardly afford to pay them, nevertheless did pay them cheerfully on that occount, and they ought to pause before they gave that money which was intended to support the destitute, in in creasing salaries, and particularly before they gave it to those who could afford to do without it. (Hear, hear, and cheers.) Mr. KILSHAW spoke warmly and energetically in favour of Mr. and Mrs. Dowdall. They had not paid them nearly so well as the last governor and matron, who had £4OO a year, and he would say they deserved more,—they deserved £5OO a year. (Loud cheers.) Mr. KNAPPER was greatly opposed to the increase of sa laries, but he thought an additional £lOO a year in this case was not out of the way. Mr. CLARKE said, as he perceived the opinion of the meet ing was against him, and as he meant nothing personal as regarded Mr. and Mrs. Dowdall, he would withdraw his op position to the grant. He only feared that these encroach ments would be continued. The motion was carried, it being stipulated that the addi tional £lOO per annum was for the express purpose of pro curing a life assurance. On the motion of reappointing the Rev. Mr. Joseph Chap. lain to the Workhouse, Mr. HOLLAND stepped forward, and after repeating a story against Mr. Joseph, containing similar charges to those brought forward by him at the last general vestry, he moved that he be not re-appointed Chaplain to the Workhouse. Mr. W. RUSHTON spoke in high terms of the conduct and qualifications of Mr. Joseph. If they searched England through they could not find a better man or one more fitted for the office. Mr. HOLLAND.—I wrote a letter to the Bishop of Chester letailing the whole circumstances. (To Mr. Rushton.) Per laps you never put your hand in your pocket for him as I iavedone. It has been said I told all this at the last vestry, . _ and I did ; and I shall oppose him at every vestry. The CHAIRMAN said he decidedly objected to ex parte statements without proofs against individuals at vestry meet ings. (Applause.) As the Bishop of Chester had been men tioned, he might state that since the letter alluded to was written the Bishop of Chester had ordained Mr. Joseph, which he would.not have done had he conceived anything to exist against his character. He might state furher, that the Bishop of Chester, in consequence of what he had heard, ap pointed a commission, consisting of himself (Rector Brooks,) Mr. Campbell, and Dr. Tattershall, to investigate the allega tions against Mr. Joseph. The result was that his moral character came out quite clear. That he had been guilty of indiscretions he did not deny, but nothing worse. He had been indiscreet, for he was a simple minded man who knew little or nothing of the world, and, in consequence, he had been stripped of all of which he was possessed, which he (the Chairman) believed was not much. Since his appointment he had performed his duty undefatigably. With regard to his having been a Jew, as had been stated, they had no right to find fault with him for that now. If he had left the Jews and become a Christian they had still less reason to find fault with him. (Cheers.) As his case had been fairly in vestigated, and the result in his favour, it was hardly fair to him to bring it forward now. (Cheers.) A. Parishioner in the gallery spoke very highly - of Mr. Joseph, both in regard to his character and the manner in which he had discharged the duties of his office. If he had any fault it was his gi:eat charity to the poor. The CHAIRMAN said he had - fallen into ari error in respect of the letter spoken off, which he now understood was written to the Bishop not only after Mr. Joseph's ordination but after his appointment as Chaplain to the Workhouse. How ever, there was a letter written to the Bishop before his or . dination, and it was to that he had alluded. • Mr. HOLLAND renewed his amendment, which was se conded by Mr. MORTITON. It was negativeed by a very large majority, not above four or six hands being held.up in its favour. It was proposed that a reduced church-rate of one penny in the pound be paid in lieu of the former rate of three-half pence in the pound. Carried with great applause. On the proposal to grant one hundred guineas to the East- ern Dispensary, Mr. JAMES MULLENEUX opposed the motion. Mr. Mul leneux stood so far back under the gallery, and spoke in so low a tone, that it was with difficulty we could catch the im port of what he said. We understood him to state that, as Vice-President of the old Dispensary, he felt it his duty to oppose the proposition'. The Eastern Dispensary owed its origin to a private party, and was not entitled to any support from the parish. It had taken away subscriptions from the old institution without relieving it of its patients, for the latter had of late greatly increased. The old institution took in precisely the same district as the new one, therefore, while it did its 'duty properly the latter was uncalled for. He hoped he should gain credit for not being influenced by arty motive but that of wishing to support the oldest charities in the town, and desiring to protect the interests of the poor. He should move that this grant be not allowed. Mr. CLARKE seconded the motion. „ Mr. JAMES ASPINALL, as Chairman of the Committee o the Eastern Dispensary, disclaimed the idea of that charity having been instituted for private purposes. He had sat upon the committee of that charity to which Mr. Mulleneux alluded, as he believed he had upon almost every other, for he had been connected with every other in the town, and he was certain the funds of the Eastern Dispensary would be as properly applied as those of any other Dispensary whatever. Every one knew how the town had increased, and the neces sity there was for another Dispensary. He believed when the old Dispensary got into funds, they intended again to take in beds. He hoped, when they considered the good which the Eastern Dispensary had done, that the parish would allow them the same privileges as the others. He re peated that he thought the funds of the Eastern Dispensary were as well applied, and as much needed also, as those of any other institution, and he could not but think any opposi tion to their claims exceedingly invidious. Mr. MTILLENEUX. (Cries of spoke, spoke.) He wished to say a few words lu explanation. It would be well if, be fore they decided this question, they would give themselves a little time for inquiry. (Spoke, spoke.) This dispensary would make a claim on the queen's marriage fund. (Spoke, spoke.) He merely wished to explain that he did not imply for a moment that the funds of the new dispensary were not properly aplied, but that they would interfere with and crip ple the operations of the old institution. Mr. ASPINALL said the committee of the queen's mar riage fund had consented that the eastern dispensary should participate in its benefits. Mr. PARKER said, if Mr. Mulleneux, with his philantro phic mind, only knew the necessity which existed for the slew dispensary, he was sure he would not continue his oppo sition to this grant for one moment. The question was put, and the motion for the grant was carried by a large majority. Mr. ISAAC HOLMES wished to ask the vestry-clerk whe ther he had any reason to suppose that the town council intended to oppose the rescinding of the watch rate act. Mr. LOWNDES said he had seen tl - e town-clerk a few days since, and the latter gave him to understand, that any mea sures they might take on the subject would not be opposed. Mr. WILKINSON proposed the usual grant of 20 guineas to Mr. Dowdall, but at the suggestion of Mr. Lowndes, and some others, he withdrew the motion. Mr. MONTGOMERY proposed a resolution to the effect that the select vestry he requested and empowered to oppose the Inland Bonding Bill to the utmost of their power. Mr. BUSHDY seconded the motion. Mr. CLARKE said he could not see what the parishioners had to do with this question. Those gentlemen who were benetitted by the present bonding system should, if they thought themselves, likely to be injured by that which it was proposed to intfoduce, do it of themselves by private sub scription out of their pocks. There were hundreds of pa rishioners who had no benefit from the bonding of goods in Liverpool, and he did not see why the owners of warehouses, whose interests were affected, should come and endeavour to saddle the parish with the expense of opposing a bill which they thought would injure their business. Every individual who felt his interests touched upon might now go to t the vestry and call upon the parish for aid, and, so the system would go on till, what with deputations and other expenses, instead of the rate being one penny it would be two pence or three pence or four pence or eigt t pence. In every trade in Liverpool, it might happen that an act of parliament might he brought forward which would appear to do some injury, and the persons engaged in that trade, instead of thinking, as they naturally ought to do, of protecting their interests out of their own resources, would say, " Oh, we have nothing to do but go to the vestry and the parish will bear all the expense of our deputation and of our application to parliament !" This was a very objectionable proposition altogether. If the par ties who held warehouses felt aggrieved they were .quite monied men enough to oppose this bill without calling upon the parish to expend the money which was paid by many persons with difficulty enough, for the poor, to assist them. Mr. CHRISTOPHER BUSHELL said their opponents had evidently not given the subject on which they had spoken much consideration. They were great economists, as it ap peared by their professions ; but it did not appear to have struck them that it was a principle of economy to oppose this measure (cheers), which was that of keeping as much money in their own pockets as possible. (Cheers.) Was there any economy in driving trade from their own doors, in sending away rental that helped to pay their parochial rates, in rais ing up a number of expensive Custom-house establishments in Manchester, Birmingham, Sheffield, Wolverhampton, and other places ? These establishments would entail upon the country an enormous additional expenditure. This was a question which materially affected the parishioners of Liver pool, and if they would look into its various bearings, they would see that it was their duty to oppose it. (Hear and cheers.) With respect to the Council, with which he had the honour, if honour it were, and he supposed he must call it so, to be connected, he regretted that that body should have act ed, on so important a question, with a degree of apathy that was disgraceful to them. The question was one of vital im portance to every individual in the town, whether it were a tradesman or a shopkeeper, or an artisan, or a labourer, yet the Council had not entertained it at all. They could discuss many questions with which they might appear to haxe less to do : they could discuss, forsooth, the corn-laws, the privi lege question (laughter), and appeal to the sympathies by speaking loudly and eloquently in favour of. humanity ; but when the best interests of the parishioners were concerned, where there was a measure brought forward for taking away one-half your trade, which this would do, they were as silent as the grave. (Cheers.) This question was by no means a warehouse question ; it was one which concerned all the trad ing interests of the town, for it would narrow the trade of the town fully one-half. (Hear, hear.) Could any one, there fore, refuse to admit that the fate of the town was much in volved in it. If the value of the warehouses were reduced, looking on it in that point of view alone, would not the rates be reduced ? The trade itself would be reduced, he repeated, at least one-half, and, as it could not be pretended that such reduction would not injure the parishioners at large, it was their duty to oppose the measure. Mr. DOVER said, the parties who had taken up this matter were wholly disconnected with the warehouse party. He be lieved the matter was first moved by those interested in the wine and tea trade. At the same time, the warehouse pro prietors rightly considered that the measure would do them no good ; and that it would be injurious to the parishioners, and even to the county at large, could not admit of a doubt. He had it from a gentleman high in the Customhouse esta blishment, that they would have to institute customs esta blishments in other places, which would be as expensive, in proportion to the business, as this in Liverpool. On these grounds he thought the measure should be opposed. Mr. CLARKE, in explanation, said, he had opposed the parish going into the matter, on the ground that it was not a proper question on which the parochial funds should be ex pended. The money of the parish was collected for poor peo ple, and not for the aid of-the rich. Mr. Bushell intimated, that having got into the council, he had got into bad com pany, and he (Mr. Clarke) thought the sooner he got out of it, the better. (Laughter.) A voice—We'll not let him ; we'll give him good company. (Renewed laughter.) When the council came forward to improve the commerce of the port, and to erect warehouses for the accommodation of the merchants, who found fault with them, and who voted against them ? And now, when they did not choose to interfere with persons who wished to have the warehousing of a portion of their own goods, who again found fault with them ? People voted for cross-purposes, for their own benefit, and not for the public good.—(A voice—Was it for the public good that Mr. Clarke got his license ? ) After a few words from Mr. Bushell, Mr. Clarke's propo sition for negativing the motion was put and lost. The origi nal motion was carried by a large majority. Mr. KNAPPER expressed his gratification that, so far from any defalcation being found against Mr. Walthew, it had turned out that there was a balance of four or five pounds in his favour. His services had been very great to the parish during a very long period, and he would propose that £lOO IT granted to him as a gratuity, to be renewed annually. Mr. ELLIS seconded the proposition. Mr. BRYDEN opposed the motion, on the ground that it opend the door for an endless routine of similar pensions to several individuals. This sort of gratuity was entirely with out precedent, and the parish was heavily enough burdened already. If this would be merely to Mr. Walthew, he would not oppose it ; but who was there that had served the parish for any length of time who was not entitled to a similar grant as much as Mr. Walthew ? It was a new thing, and he ob jected to it, and he was convinced that the bulk of the parishi oners would object to it too. Mr. BIGHAM seconded the amendment. He was proceed ing to recapitulate the charges against Mr. Walthew, when he was stopped by Mr. Kisstiftw, who said they had found out, on examin ing Mr. Walthew's accounts, that he had credited more money than he had received. Mr. BIGHAM said lie was glad Mr. Walthew had come out of it so well. No one, however, could prove that he bad not been a political partisan. (Disapprobation.) He only wanted to show that he had used the influence of his office impro perly. (Hisses.) If he could make out that, he should move that he ought not to receive this annuity. He had stated the same before, and was informed that Mr. Walthew had behaVed in like manner to tories as well as well as libe rals. (A voice, " Call them radicals or destructives.") He could produce cases that would illustrate his charge, but he weuld confine himself to one which was his own. Mr. Bigharn proceeded to state that he resided in Marybone, whence he removed, and when Mr. Walthew called upon him he asked him what he had to pay on the two houses. Mr. Walthew told him, and he paid the amount, asking Mr. Wal thew if his removal would affect his franchise. Mr. Walthew said he would take care that it should not do so, and he made a note in the margin of his book for the purpose. He found that he was objected to—went before the barrister, and was struck off. When he called upon Mr. Hart to ascertain the reason, he found it stated in the margin of the book that on the day when he had removed to another house he had be come a lodger. He asked if that conduct were just or was it not? How could they expect parties to act justly if they overlooked such conduct, and even rewarded those who were guilty of it? However, if they granted this annuity, they would do so illegally,' and he had power to oppose it before a magistrate—and that would be done. It would be an illegal grant. Mr. Walthew had been the means of depriving him of his franchise, which was dearer to him than money, be cause money he could make, but his franchise be could not get back when deprived of it." Mr. ELLis expressed his satisfaction that Mr. Walthew had come out clear. He had served the parish twenty-six years, and had been turned out upon mere report, and a new collector appointed, whereby they had gained £6O per annum, so that he thought Mr. Walthew was entitled to this grant. Mr. JAMES ASPINALL said it had been proved that Mr. Walthew had acted. the same by tories as by radicals. As an old freeman, he would remind the gentleman who had talked of his franchise being dearerto hint than money, that the old freemen had been deprived of their franchise. He thought it was but common justice to. Mr. Walthew to give him this small grant. Mr. LOWNDES produced a letter which had been received in reply to one written by. Mr. Mozley, to the poor-law com missioners. The latter stated, that it would be decidedly il legal to pay any pension whatever to a parochial officer. It was probable, however, Mr. Lowndes thought, that Mr. Barnes' motion might be carried into effect, by appointing Mr. Walthew one of the visiting overseers, with the sum proposed as a salary. Mr. BARNES adopted the proposition, which was seconded by Mr. Bigham and adopted. Mr. FORD was proceeding to call the attention of the vestry to the bill of the corporation to empower them to borrow money on bond instead of mortgage, when Mr. LOWNDES informed him, that the parish could not interfere in the matter. Mr. LEYLAND proposed the thanks of the meeting to the chairman, and the latter returned a suitable reply. The meeting broke up at three o'clock. WALTON-ON-THE-HILL. The annual meeting in vesting of the ley-payers of the parish of Walton-on-the-Hill, was held in the parish church on Tuesday morning, at ten o'clock. The Rev. Mr. Moss, the vicar, took the chair. There was a very numerous attendance. Mr. BIRKETT, one of the retiring churchwardens, opened the proceedings 'by reading the notice convening the meeting. Mr. HARDY produced a newspaper in which L 1 notice had been advertised, and enquired whether it was a copy of the original notice ? The CHAIRMAN replied that by law notice was required to be given only on the church doors, and that to advertise it in the newspapers was not camputsory by the act of parliament. Mr. HARDY said it was ordered by the last vestry that the notice should be advertised in all the papers, and also fixed upon the doors of all - the churches in the parish. The notice stated that the meeting was called according to ancient cus tom to pass the accounts of the church wardens for the past year ; now he wanted to know whether it was the ancient custom to call the meeting for ten o'clock ? Mr. BIRKETT replied that the meeting had been appointed to he held at ten o'clock in compliance with the wishes of many of the pasishioners. As to the advertisement in the newspapers it was not necessary, and notice had been given to the owners of all the various townships in the parish that the meeting would be held at ten o'clock, and copies of the churchwardens accounts had been sent to them. Mr. MARDY enquired in what papers notice of the mee ing had been given? BrautiTT said in the Mail and the Journal of last Saturday—one paper on each side. Mr. LEDGER asked what was the hour at which former meetings had been held? Mr. SIRKETT replied that it was twelve, adding, as he had before observed, that it had been changed for ten, which was better for most of the parishioners. Mr. HALL requested the vestry clerk to give is opinion, whether the notice was a legal notice or not? Mr. whether -. (vestry clerk) said there could be no ques tion that the notice was perfectly legal. Mr. HEATON wished there was a legal adviser on his side of the question to contradict that opinion. Mr. BIRKE'TT then read the accounts, from which it ap peared that the last rate had been nearly collected, except in the districts of West Derby and Everton. There was a de ficiency of about £29, on the account of the current year, in which was included the expense of rebuilding the south wall of the church, painting and joiner's work. It was im possible to catch many of the items as they were read, owing to the confusion and disorder that prevailed throughout the whole proceedings. Mr. HEATON said he should oppose the accounts, because the ringers could not legally be paid out of the funds of the parish. He should like to know whether there were no rich people attending the church who could afford to find sacra mental wine for the poor, without imposing the expense of . , . . ._ it upon the parish ? Mr. H ALL called for the minutes of the last vestry to be read. Mr. BIRKETT read them; whereupon Mr. HARDY complained that a resolution to the effect that no rate should be laid for the last year had not been entered on the books. Mr. HALL said a motion had also been passed—that the expense of repairing the church should be limited to a certain sum, but there was no entry of it. Mr. BIRKETT said, if the vestry would allow a rate of two pence this year, the wardens would require no more rates for the parish of Walton. If the vestry would not allow it, they must wait till it was in a better humour. He could beg the money very easily, but for one circumstance : wherever he went they said it was the undoubted law of the land that the parish church ought to be kept in repair by the parish, and it ought to be so ; but if he wanted £BOO for decorating the in side, or for building an organ afterwards, they said if he came, they.would subscribe it. Mr. HALL said the walls should be kept up and the roof repaired; there was no doubt, but it was the extra expense of the ornamental part, to which he objected. If the expense arose from making the church an ornamentalbuilding, church men ought to subscribe for it themselves, and not lay a rate for it.on the parish. Mr. LAWRENCE HEYWORTH considered it premature to speak-of a rate before it was proposed; .Mr. HALL proceeded to say that the collectors last year asserted they could collect £320 or more of the arrears, but the accounts proved that only about £152 had been collected, —not more than half. He wished to know where the balance was. He did not like the manner of stating that £2O had been paid on account, leaving-a considerable sum due. It was unsatisfactory. Mr. BraKErr said there had been some mistakes. When he came to ask Mr. Hodgson, the collector, about it, he found there was a great mistake in the municipal district of West Derby. There he expected to get £4O but he had only got £9 12s. 6d. Other mistakes had also occurred. Mr. LAWRENCE HEYWORTH contended that the affairs of the parish had been managed with propriety. The accounts proved that there had been great economy, and he did not quarrel with the churchwardens for erecting the wall sub stantially. They had done right. The whole of the items of the accounts were satisfactory, and he would give his full as sent to them. He moved that , the accounts, as they stood, do pass. Mr. MOORE seconded the motion. . _ Mr. HALL wished to know whether there were any out standing accounts relative to the building of the wall of which they did not know. Last year there were accounts outstand ing to the amount of £3OO. Mr. BinicErr said there was a small one about which, as with all the others, he might have a good deal of wrangling to keep down as low as possible. He would not have kept par ties so closely down bad he been expending his own money, but it belonged to the public and ought to be safely guarded. (Hears hear.) There was also the architect's commission for looking after the building, about £3O, certainly not more than £35. Mr. HARDY was surprised at the quarter from which the resolution came. He did not know why the other church warden was not there ; but at the last vestry dinner, when Mr. Formby's health was drunk, he had declared he would pull down and rebuild the church, or if his brother church warden would pull it down, he would build it up, and take the consequences. (Great uproar.) He meant to move that the accounts do not pass, because in his opinion they were illegal. He gave M r . Birkett credit for having expended the money economically and satisfactorily to the minds of many persons assembling to worship at that church, but it was not satisfactory to the minds of nine-tenths of the persons who did not worship there. They had no right to expend £5OO without the sanction of the parish vestry, and he was asto nished that any person should move that the accounts do pass. He hoped they were prepared to oppose the passing of the accounts, for they were illegal. He moved that they do not pass. Mr. HEATON, seconded the amendment. Mr. LAWRENCE HEYWORTH wished to reply to what had been stated. The meeting had been summoned to tax them selves ; they had been summoned there to decide whether or not a tax should be laid, but after they had once submitted to be taxed, and appointed gentlemen to carry on the work, he thought it very ungrateful and very unbecoming to attempt to deprive them of the tax. (Cheers.) He thought he could consistently make these remarks, although he objected to being taxed for a church which he never entered, which he would prove if a motion for a church rate were introduced that day. A PARISHIONER asked if persons could vote who had no paid their rates. Mr. SANDARS said that no person was entitled to vote or be present unless he had paid his church rates. Mr. HALL said he had heard the accounts read with a good deal of attention. He had also looked at the expenses, and found that economy had been the order of the day, and seeing that there was a prospebt of economy for the future, he would vote that the accounts do pass, haying ascertained that there were only two accounts besides Mr. sandar's to be paid. Mr. HARDY maintained that the expenditure for rebuilding the wall was illegal, but said he did not so much object to it as to the manner in which it had been incurred. The pulling down of the old wall was clearly illegal, as it'was done with out the consent of the parishioners. Mr. HEATON said it was illegal altogether. It was an " illegal job." An architect had offered to rebuild the wall for £lOO ; and if the vestry pressed this account, he would vote for the robbing of anybody, from the beggar to the king. Indeed, they were all Sir Francis Burdetts, for they were turning their tail. After this, he would vote for any man who would put on twenty times more taxation. (Laughter.) The amendment and the original motion were then put from the chair. There was a decided majority in favour of the latter. Mr. HEATON (before the declaration) shouted out, " There are five to four against you." (Uproar.) The CHAIRMAN.—I am clearly of opinion that the majo rity is in favour of the accounts being passed. (Cheers.) Mr. HARDY.—No, no ; the majority was in favour of the other. (Uproar.) Mr. HEATON.—You are all Sir Francis Burdetts, and I will vote for none of you. (The zealous parishioner then left the church, amidst loud laughter.) Mr. HARDY said he was dissatisfied with the decision of the Chairman, and he should demand a poll. He moved a resolution to this effect. Mr. LEDGER seconded the motion, on the ground that, in his opinion, the absent parishioners would be against the motion. Mr. WEBB thought it was too late to demand a poll. Mr. HARDY.—I will go to the poll, gentlemen. I declare, upon my honour, that the majority was against the accounts passing. (Uproar.) maintain that £7OO has been expended illegally, and I demand a poll. Mr. L. HEYWORTH said, granting that the money had been expended illegally, what better would Mr. Hardy be for a poll ? He could not get the money back, and he (Mr. Heyworth) therefore did not see what object would be gained by a poll. If he had been able to see any rational end to be accomplished by it, he would support the motion ; but as he could not, he should oppose it. Mr. HARD V.—Oh ! I disapprove of the system altogether. The churchwardens are ignorant of the law ; and I maintain they have taken down the church wall at their own hazard, and on their own responsibility. (Uproar.) Mr. L. HEYwotern said Mr. Hardy might enjoy his own opinion ; but those who thought otherwise would not depart from theirs because he conceived a poll necessary. A PARISHIONER begged to a* the Vestry-clerk whether this payment was legal or not ? Mr. SANDARS said, that, supposing the vestry determined that the accounts were not right, and carried the motion that they should not pass, there was no law—and he said it with out fear of contradiction—there was no power in law to com pel the churchwardens to repay the money. Mr. BIRKETT asked if the expenditure of moifey in hand to repair the walls was not legal? Was there a lawyer pre sent who would tell him that the expenditure of money for that purpose was not legal ? Mr. LEDGER would not take the law from the tipse dixit of any gentleman. There was a motion made last year that there should be no rate, and that had not been entered on the books. A PARISHIONER said, that be hoped gentlemen who wanted to involve the parish in law would pay the expenses out of their own pockets. " I beg," said the speaker, to pass a motion that they pay it out of their own pockets. Mr. LEDGER.—You can only move the motion, you cannot pass it. Talk sense, and then I'll take to you. Mr. HARDY then quoted Burn's Justice, to prove that the item was illegal. Mr. WEBBE.—We are not a court of justice, and cannot hear you. Mr. HARDY.—But Dr. Lushington, whom I have in my pocket,—(loud laughter,)—says that churchwardens cannot pull down or erect without the sanction of the leypayers. Mr. WEBB.—But you cannot pull down after you have once erected. Mr. HALL recommended that they should at once decide whether there should be a poll. Mr. L. HEYWORTH suggested that the question of a poll should be deferred till the regular business had been disposed of. _ Mr. HARDY said he would consent to that course. Mr. CARTWRIGHT.—I move that the poll be taken accord ing to Sturges Bourne's act. Mr. WEBB.—I second it. Mr. LEDGER.—Before we decide how we shall vote, let it be explained what Sturges Bourne's act is. A PARISHIONER.—It's bricks against brains in plain Eng lish. (Laughter.) Mr. WEBB asked whether the collector for. West Derby was in the meeting ? Mr. BIREETT replied in the affirmative. Mr. WEBB would take the liberty of asking, whether ge• Hardy had paid his rates? (Hear, hear.) The COLLECTOR.—Mr. Hardy has paid no rates or paro chial taxes for eighteen months. (Hear, hear.) Mr. Weee.—Then I say Mr. Hardy has no right to he here or to speak in this meeting. (Hear, hear.) Mr. BAINES.—Mr. Hardy, pay your taxes ! If you don't , you have no business here. (Uproar.) Mr. HARDY.—I have a right to be here if I have not paid my rates. Dr. Lushington says—(great uproar) — Oh, yo u ' , not carry your point by trying to put me down. Mr. WEBB.—You may be present by courtesy ; but you have na right to be here unless you have paid your rates. , Mr. LEDGER said if Mr. Hardy was disqualified he woul d demand a poll. Mr. HARDY said that according to the best legal authori: ties he had a right to demand a poll, notwithstanding he ha ° not paid his rates. (Uproar.) After some further discussion, the details of which it was impossible to collect amidst the disorder that prevailed, the motion was understood to be withdrawn. The CHAIRMAN said that, on behalf of the Rector of V ton, he begged to name Mr. Thomas Birkett as the rector churchwarden for the ensuing year. It was the duty of the vestry to elect another. Mr. BIRKETT said that nothing but the friendly mann er in which he had been treated by the Chairman, since he case into that neighbourhood, could have induced him to ti' e office again. It had been asked dAy Mr. Formby, his brothe r churchwarden, was not there. He would not say ; but the)" had worked together harmoniously, excepting on one poin s A PARISHIONER.—Was not that difference about th i wall? Mr. BIRKETT.—We did not differ with regard to any eN' pense. A PARISHIONER said he had heard on respectable autho rity, that the reason why Mr. Formby was not present n'ti that he expected to be asked some questions which he No e not like to answer. Mr. SANDARS had reason to think that Mr. Formby absence was caused by his attendance at the Board of Gul l ; dians, at Low-hill workhouse, to hear some communica tion from the poor-law commissioners. Mr. HOLT then moved, and a PARISHIONER seconded $ resolution, to the effect that Mr. John Broadbent be °P . pointed the other churchwarden. It was carried. es' A long and unimportant discussion followed on the V re tion, whether the powers of the two churchwardens w e i,t equal. It terminated in a resolution proposed by Mr. 1 4 /J'A to the effect, that the churchwardens have equal power s'i;e controul over the disbursements of any rata that may laid. The CHAIRMAN then announced that the next busio e° would be the levying of a thurch-rate for the year ensuing,i Mr. HALL moved that_a rate of two pence in the P° lll be granted. Mr. Rome'. seconded the motion.' Ikwas di sg racefik, t , a parish like Walton, that the church wall was not r eba te About £9OO would rebuild it, and the remainder of reba te money would be appropriated to current expenses. Mr. LEYLAND said that less than 21d. Would not be Stlf. ficie M nt. h e it ti r. CARTWRIGHT hoped that 80 long as the law P.- the burden of repairing the church on the parishionolibe would be observed ; and he trusted a 2;d. rate woOl d i, granted. It would be a paltry consideration to every 01 vidual in the parish. t, Mr. L. HEYWORTH, in a long speech, said that, alt..°ol he was a churchman, he should oppose the rate, on the o ° o 4 that it was unjust, and also that the parishioners couhl be taxed but with their own consent. 0 Mr. BAINES supported the motion, and .Mr. Lno ° su pp or it. bich A. very long and most irregular debate followed, in I/ all sorts of tpics were introduced. On a divis o ion, the CHAIRMAN declared that the inZ r itli was against the rate. This announcement was receive shouts of applause by the anti-rate party RTWRIGHT an. . d l‘ fr i A poll was then demanded by Mr. CA c .e. LEYLAND, which the CHAIRMAN granted, and ann°uet that it would be taken according to Sturges Bourne de and commence at ten o'clock on Thursday morning , l e S Thanks chool-room. de ° were then voted to the retiring churchw er and to the chairman, and the meeting separated. TIIE POLLING-GLORIOtAIthviPH OF 10 CHURCH. • In accordance with the notice, the polling cornmen' the ten o'clock yesterday morning, in the School-room i n levy churchyard. The liberal" party the day before had P th i tifully circulated hand-bills calling on the people, if . , co r wished tb be robbed, to go and poll for the rate , anu.or's taining other similar ingenuities, betraying a colls ei°u eod of weakness in their camp. On the other hand, the fr',J of the church Used 'no clap-trap--they relied on th e sense of the parishioners, and on their attachment 1 0 t" e stitutions of their country. The Rev. Mr. Moss presided. Exactly at four o' cl `to• the poll-books were closed, and the Rev. Chairtn Bll flounced this gratifying result:— srote s ' persons. For the Rate Against the Rate 3 /1 MAJORITY FOR THE RATE' The poll will be resuined at ten o'clock this morning' - - '. KIRKDALE SESSIONS. of . The Quarter Sessions of the Peace for the div p pia!!tii, Kirkdale commenced yesterday, at the Court-hous e, „ 0 3 4 dale, before the Rev. Jonathan Brooks, Ch a irmae , 4 ' full bench of Magistrates.` e . . The calendar is unusually light, there being only fifty's, cases for trial. , J i g) ; The following gentlemen were sworn on the Gran ° bto°, —George Walker, Aughton ; Henry Underwood, "I c or W. C. Jones, Bedford; John Aspinall, Ormskirk ; 01 Harriott, Ormskirk ; Sylvester IVlorecroft, Orinskir i ' l ihog, Barton, Warrington; Hugh Clare, Warrington; ''. May, Warrington ; Thomas Robinson, W arringw e li e , 4l mund Hill, Attest . ; Ralph Poole, Allerton ; Wm. Se' Dit il . lerton ; Robert Gill, Much Woolton; Joseph All el i i i Fi e Woolton ; Peter Weadle, Warrington ; John Gaske ' • N 'ell' cot ; Thomas.Morecroft, Aughton. bt , ' ti' Mr. Thomas Bowker, of Warrington, and Mr. Ro tt eo son, of Much Woolton, were each fined £3. for non J t ance. 'd, th te The CHAIRMAN, in addressing the grand jury, s ai os l + 4 , ( on looking over the calendar he was happy to cOng o r it til t them on its being a short one, and both to save th : sr),l' e rt and that the court might not be kept longer than neat; tP c e was glad to say that the number of persons broug .. e il t J was very greatly reduced. He did not see that tq e4 4 any cases but those continually coming before P e bilo juries, and about which they would feel no ditticultY'w ti they found any difficulty the court would be haolt b str, them any information. He was not aware of anything ',A occurred since they last met requiring particular obs e % s of'„, excepting as regarded the Rural Police Act, which 0;,.01!;:t in force. An act was lately passed, authorising th ° ' for v i i ties who chose to adopt it, to form a rural police co o t i agricultural and rural portion of the county. 111 tii is ,. 0 1 ,ht that ac't had been adopted unanimously, and there 7 0 0 v r , dissentient voice raised against it by the magistrates t beP t , l 'of surrounding districts, at a large meeting, held f 0 e .4 0,, u t pose. Not only they themselves said it was licco• J sv' l ,t, they expressed the opinions .of many persons roull ec os,,,i them, saying, that the act was necessary on this ' II foe In many of the large towns they had.,, established A 11 ) 0 r i and excellent police force, and th e consequence w" s ' t he Id thieves would be driven from th e t owns to live 00 4 t for, t o portions of the country, if t h ere were no protectio n 4 ' 0 , , e 0 o r to them, the depredations in. the town.would be re u :i isl i P the country, and th at h a d a l rea d y been. experience o f t rf neighbourhood of Liverpool. The establishment r og e r ! rural police would h ave th e e ff ec t of protecting the 1 ;0rr of those who lived separate from large towns. I t c o'' / i4 organizing, and in many attic principal parts of th % , c of t e it was already in force. They had been successful iugoor the services of Captain Woodford, as superintenda l t iri hoped it would be found of great service in protec of property of the country. We re A few cases were afterwards disposed of, but they no public interest. J ej` i. ............, .......... f_ .11' h i ' A Fa NEW LIFE-BOAT.—The Steam-tug Compa "Y A. O added to their establishment a large, commodious , ,,` - ii ger . .ill , plete life-boat. She will, on the occurrence of ut t id i* .co' towed to sea by one of the company's steamersC: o re_'o, there cannot be a doubt, be found extremely useft o ,., dv dt , ing shipwrecked mariners from danger and, prObAb i ' cc ide;iy ACCIDENT TO PRINCE ALBERT.—On Monday s" g c e, l) .o , which might have proved of very serious c onsequl t rne' c o pened to his Royal Highness Prince Albert, while J",,,ing, towards Ascot Heath, the spot selected for the tu 4 o .lio ipt of the stag for the royal hunt. His royal highness' h ot i' l mounted on a fine-spirited horse, left the castle she sold'o'clock, o'clock, and, in coming down the Home Park ,t tbst' 3 o/ took fright and ran away. His royal hi g h nes s, nuv' A , die t ° ,.jog ing he is a good rider, was precipitated from his Ow d Ils 0. ground, but, fortunately, was not much hurt, IT, t o ). I , l e o mounted another horse, which was speedily brorig'4o (1 0 ile proceeded on to the " meet." Her majesty, schc w t he c li " in a phteton by Prince Ernest, had not quitted e' gates when the occurrence alluded to took place. h 3 erg THE WEATHER.—Within the last few days, s ue has 1,'01 ( ficial change has taken place in the weather I S t he ' r 6 # seldom been experienced ; so much so indeed th 3t The g d o face of nature has assumed a different aspect; 00; 01 has put on its summer livery ; and the corn, will u . o , i, 5 ll' siderable affected by the late cold and wet sen clesiv",;o l .', looking as prosperous as the most fastidious c oul loot oo rit o the neighbourhood of Retforti t "t4, wheats are u:, t he sP Of, promising, particularly theearty um) flats ; whil ; ra i n s, to ,l sown is improving daily. Since the late genis' iot a , 0 1J , barley has been making its appearance most ltisu r seel: ls o farmers state. they have never.seen it look pasture-grounds have improved almost beyond b e iOi 0 ' caster Gazette. ~, ftev• r ii . INDUCTION OF TUE VICAR OF PRESTON. -1 'P s t t , 2 0. it! Parr, A.M., recently appointed 'vicar 'of this Ol i o 6 Ite re d in Preston on Thursday morning, and his visit w ,.bel o '.,ce welcomed by cheerful peals from the parish chure",, t he . rot rev. gentleman some time afterwards event throug!'' to I.l‘ o , ral ancient cerenroni*performed at thi inductioomr, Jvf, in the church. Perhaps we may adOere, thattfoo better• iie v-i f• preached a most exCeltent sermon on:good F r ids . . 4 4- i y c e.. s i t e( and after Wards took part in 'the o l itnori n?l nnican i ts ' i ed U.,ite e..9 l7 rnuri:on , ss ,lis g i:e i o t which occasion. the number than usual. The reYerend,geutlCthi'4 also presS _ore evening to a large, 'Sttentiv, and, highly gra ti tie ' tion.—Preston Pilot. . . ~~ r ~, c, i. (~j~ ~t` 5 9~. •BSI 14 t t iVil 'lllli 4 11 41 0 15 4 ; 1 (1 , 1 14 t)111,