The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1836-07-01 00:00:00

CRIMINAL OFFENDERS-ENGLAND & WALES. Memoranda of, some qt . the principal Results shown by [ll the Tables for the Year 1835. There has been a total decrease in the numbers charged in 1835, as compared with the precedingyear, of 1,720 persons, or nearly 8 per cent. In 30 English counties there was a decrease. This decrease was most marked in the following counties:—ln Northamptonshire it was nearly one-half; in Herefordshire, above one-third ; in Berkshire, Cheshire, Hampshire, and Worcestershire, one-fourth; and in Durham and Shropshire, one-fifth. In Middlesex the decrease was 17 per cent. ; in Surrey, little more than 4 per cent. ; in Yorkshire 14 per cent.; and inLancashire, 44_, per cent- In Wales, the total decrease on the 12 counties was 27 per cent. In the remaining 11 English counties, and in Bristol, there was an increase, which was proportionally greatest; in Gloucestershire, where it amounted to 19 per cent.; in Kent, to 15 per cent. ; in Warwickshire, to 14 per cent. ; and in Staffordshire, to 10 per cent. In Essex, the increase was above 8 per cent. • The decrease does not appear to be confined:to any one • class of offences, but to be spread pretty equally over the whole—being, however, rather the greatest on the more hideous•effences. Thus the offence against the person bore the proportion to the whole,' in 1834, of 10 25 per cent., and in 1835 of 9-72 per cent..only_; and the violent offences against property, in 1834, of 6-53 per cent. ; and -in 1835 of 6-50 per cent. Making the comparison with the average of the preceding five years, there 'is an in crease in the,offences against the person, (exclusive of assaults, and assaults on peaee-Offfcers, which were not then admitted into the calculations,) of 7 per cent. But in the violent offences against property, a -decrease is shown of above - 11-25 per cent., and in the malicibuS offences against property of 137 per cent. Resuming the comparison with the year . 1834, the de crease which took place skews the following results on the numbers sentenced:—lncluding the commutations, there - is a decrease in the numbers transported of 414, and in the numbers imprisoned' of 782. In the capital convic tions, there is an increase of 43 persons, which arose chiefly in the numbers charged with robbery and burglary; though the increase in the latter offence may be probably attributed more to the recent alteration in the law of housebreaking than to an increase in the number of bur, glarieS. The numbers, executed are the same in both years-34. The decrease has not only been proportional on the juvenile offenders, but greater in that than in the other classes. The proportion of offenders aged 12 years and under was, in 1834, 1-78 per cent., and in;1835, 1-67 per cent. only ; of offender's aged 16 and above 12, in . 1834, 9-82 per cent., but in 1835, 9-70 per cent.: From the new table, showing the courts before which the prisoners were tried, it appears that 2,849 were tried' before the new central criminal court, 3,408 before the circuit assize courts,, 10,737 (above : .half ) before the county quarter sessions courts, and 3,737 before local courts. As the different offences tried before each of these courts are described in the tables, it will be seen how greatly the recent abolition of the capital punish ments in many cases has tended to increase the jurisdic tion of the sessions. Last year these courts tried 132 prisoners for housebreaking, 14 for cattle-stealing, 62 for horse-stealing, 108 for shecp-stealing, a nd 41 f o r larceny to the value of £5 in dwelling-ho Uses; all of which offences, while the capital punishment existed, were tried at the assizes. The acts for the consolidation of the cri minal law, passed in 1827, also greatly increased the se verity of the sentences, which it was in the power of the sessions to pass, and transportation for life, theretofore' not a common sessions punishment, is now of constant recurrence. Borne-office, Whitehall, May, 1836. TEN GOLDEN RULES. In early life let your children be instructed in every accomplishment suited to females. If they have not an innate taste for music, let it be an acquired one. Some men prefer a clever wife to a pretty one. The daughter must not be a proficient in more languages than the mo ther. Conversations may be carried on in foreign tongues, full of important matter to the young lady and chaperon; which, if the latter is unaquainted with the language, might be productive of much harm. When toll your daughter is lovely, do not contradict that opi nion; it seems only like affectation, denying what is . really the case ; besides, the world is always very willing to detract from the merit possessed by any individual. Never speak ill of another person's daughter : it can do no good, and appears envious. Every one is lovely in the eyes of their respective admirer. Observing the same things daily breeds indifference. Young ladies should not be seen too frequently by the person you wish to interest in their favour. " A maid oft seen, a gown oft worn, Are disesteemed, and held in scorn." The old adage of " hot love soon cold" I have often found in my long experience to be true. That whi c h has been kindled with haste seldom retains its heat long. It is absolutely necessary that a chaperon be well ac quainted with the peerage, in all its intricacies and de tails. The debutante should also have a slight know ledge of that important work. Shakspeare must have laboured under a temporary aberration of intellect when he wrote." What's in a name ?" Surely the names of Howard, Fitzroy, Russell, Lennox, Montague, &c. &c., will bear the palm over those of Brown, Johnson, Thomp son, Figgins, &c. &c. If a girl unfortunately takes a fancy to a man unfit to be her husband, it must not be noticed. "Love burns the more fiercely for obstruc tions." If the passion increases talk the subject over - lightly,—detect some feature he possesses not quite in harmony with the rest of his person, criticise, and laugh at it; for Addison says, "Ridicule perhaps is a better expedient against love than sober advice." Beware of younger sons ; they are a race especially patronised by girls who are not aware of the danger of such proceed ings. In general society they are of use to call the car riage, take mothers to the supper-room, &c. Never be -.guilty of taking your daughter to country balls • she can only acquire bad m anners , ru d e h a bit s , and vulgar no tions. A girl of rank and fashion ought to feel that Lon don is her element.—Journal of a Chaperon, by Henri etta Mary Beauclerk. A POLITICAL PARALLEL. We take the following from D' Vindication of the English Constitution.---Instead cf Political Unions, they ap pealed to the city apprentices, and the trained bands: mobs were hired, petitions forged,all the arts of insurgency practised. The Peers were daunted, the King frightened; Strafford was executed, the Bishops expelled the House of Lords,_ the House of Commons itself rendered independe n t o f the King and its constituents by the act which made its dissolution consequent on its own pleasure. At length,lY the remonstrance and the pro positions, the very abrogation of the monarchy being attempted, •the King raised his standard, and so completely had the nn happy monarch, by his conduct, placed the commons in the _wrong, that the very personage who, two years before, had ab solutely no party in the nation', found himself supported by a considerable majority of bis people, and nearly the whole of Inc peerage, while the vote which virtually occasioned the struggle, and was the triol of strength of the two parties in the House of Commons, was only carried by a majority of eleven. The suc cess of the royal arms, and the unexpected strength of the royal party, filled the commons with consternation. The' moderate member continued to flock to the King. Pym and Harnpden, finding that they were deserted by their aristocratic companions, and that the puritans androot-and-branch-men were not pow erful enough to support them, mode an open and absolute alli ance with the Scotch presbiterians, with whom they had olways had a secret understanding,, swallowed the covenant whi c h they had before disfavoured, decree the extermination of the church of England, beheaded Laud, called in a Scotch army, and main tained their cause by a connexion offensive to their countrymen. Am I indeed treating , !f the reign of Charles the first ? or is it some near epoch that I ant commemorating, ? Am I writing of the affairs of the seventeenth, or the nineteenth century? The! e is such a marvellous similarity between the periods, that, for my P art, I find great difficulty in discriminating between the two. In both instances the church o f E ngland is the great victim, and at both seasons the vast majority of the English people were warmly and tenderly attached to - their establishment. In koth cases the aristocratic leaders of the movement thoubgt fit to secede from their own party, while in both cases their more deter mined or desperate associates compensate tliemseh-es for the desertion by the alliance of revolutionary or anti-national sup port. In one instance the radicals, in the other the root-and branch-men; in one instance the dissenters, in the other the puritans, and in both instances, when radicals and dissenter s in the one case, and puritans and root-and-branch-men in the other, fail in making up with their influence for the loss of the ar i sto _ cratic connexions of the leaders who,.had summoned them, we find the same d es p ara t e an d treasort,ableponPact made in on e age with the Scotch presbytericrlid in the other with the Iri s h papists; the solemn l ea m nd co y e nant, so long repudiated, swallowed as the c onditi on ,in the first instance; and the Irish church scheme, one so warmly opposed, gulped down in the other. PHRENOLOGY. "It is impossible to read Mr. Cornbe's testimonials, now in pretty general circulation, without arriving at a conviction that phrenology is actually embraced as a science by the first physi ologists in Europe, and i s ra pidl y diff us i ng i tse l f over the civilized world."—Scotsman. NV e must put our contemporary, and those whom his remarks may mislead, right as to the opinion of the first physiologists in Europe with regard to phrenology, Magendie of Paris, and Tiedemann of Heidelberg, and we believe we may add Sir Charles Bell, assuredly the most eminent physiologists in the world, are decided anti.phrenologists. Magendie says, "Phre nology I scruple not to denominate a pseudo-science, such as was formerly astrolorry or necromancy." Tiede mann , we know, has a proper feeling of re s p ec t t owar d s those clever phrenologists of Whom we have a few here, whose (I)rzans of acquisitivetnent and self-esteem (to speak in their own lard") are largely developed, and which we presu me satisfac torily se,„„ts- for the "pretty general circulation?' of Mr. Combe's t estimonials. We should like to know if phrenologists admit of We t hi tt rrg? , ll of misrepresentation or bombast. . it r,h t to and Fletcher of 7h• add, that the late Drs. Gordon, Milligan. all the eminent this plac e , were opposed, to plarenplogy—and authority, surely, than a omist s here and. elsewhere , are so--better high or ow degi.ee.._27, 4 ,ll an eracks or Edinburgh scribes of ....,.....„,,...:urYli• Evening Post. , FACTOIIES' 11:EGt•LATto,' - Robert Rickards, Esq., having resigned hit. oMcc of i s ' l , A e c „ l: e.tii.ii,ont t h o a r s l i ractnrie s , Abe Secretary of State for the Hinde.D cteries". to take c h ar „ Leonard Horner, Esq:, Inspector of g cif M r. RiB,a,ds: ~ 7 z f th;k o district hither to under the inspeotion ,cashire, and theshi re, with the dljacent part; kshire, —LondonLan- Gazette. 3:4143c1:tat ParliAinEnt. HOUSE OF. LORDS—MoNna v. IRISH MUNIEIPA,L-CORPORATIONS BILL—THE COMMONS SMENDMENTSs An immense number of. petitions respecting the Irish corpo rations bill, a portion of which were in favour of the bill as amended by the lords, were presented to the house. These hav ing been disposed of, Viscount MELBOUR NE called the attention of their lordships to the amendments made in the bill as sent back to them from the House of Commons, and to these amendments he confi dently hoped they would give that cool, that calm and impartial consideration which the authority of the body from whom they emanated demanded at their bands. He trusted that their lord ships would not suffer themselves, on the one hind, to be in any respect intimidated, and their claims to an independent exercise of .their rights to be affected by insulting menaces; and on the other ,'that they would nut permit their judgment to be warped, then:feelings biassed, their resentments roused by any violent opposition which might have been made to them, and to whieh, because in his opinion it carried its own refutation in its own absurdity, he did not think it necessary further to refer. Ott that account he hoped they would give to those amendments the fair, calm, and impartial consideration which they deserved. He thought they must admit that, if those proceedings should terminate in a difference between the two holises, they had com menced, the warfare in a rough, rude, and offensive manner, (Cheers.) They sent down to the other house of parliament a bill totally changed and altered in all its provisions—changed in its title, altered entirely in the whole of its principles, haying no resemblance or similitude to the bill sent up from the 'louse of Gammons eXcept in the subject matter cf it, resembling Ain nothing except that both measures related to the municipal Cur-, porations- of"-Ireland. His lordship then proceeded to state at length the nature and effect of the amendments made to the bill as amended by their lordships in the commons. The ques 7 tion .now was, whether they would adopt the general principles of those amendments, or whether they would reject them, cud it was needless foritim fo detain their lordships with minor de- . tails, which, if they were prepared to adopt a great principle, would be easily settled. , His lordship then briefly alluded to the impolicy of refusing to Ireland what had been granted to England and Scotland, and asked whether it would be wise and prudent to cicati ize arid tear open those wounds in Ireland whish were -now healing in the way which the oen-and rude rejection of this measure would have the effect of doing? The noblefviscount then referred to the speeches of Lord Lyndhurst in 1827, when Master of the Rolls, against catholic emancipa tion, and to his subsequent changl of opinion when he supported that measure. What he complained of was, not that that learned lord had changed his opinions so rapidly on that ques tion, but that in all the arguments he now riled lie seemed dis posed to recede from the opinions and 'reasonings nhi. h he professed and.urged in 1829, and reverted to those which held in 1827. The following werei his concluding observations:—in 1834 the government of this country was dissolved under cir cumstances to which it was unnecessary for him to allude. The noble lords who then came into office chose to do that which he should ever consider as a most violent and tinjestifible act, and which, bad he been placed in their situation, he would not have presumed to do—of dissolving the parliament at that time sit 7. ling. He maintained that, if they could not form their govern ment without dissolving parliament, they were bound to give up the formation of their government. But, however, they dis solved that parliament; another was chosen under all the power and influence, whatever that might be, which they possessed as a government. When they met that parliatnent, they were .in a minority of seven, of ten, of thirty. This Year their minority began at 45, and increased at the last great division on the pre sent question to 86. What was the reason, what was the cause of this? They would not be willing to attribute it to any merit in the government, nor did lie wish them to do so, but he wished them to consider whether it was not owing to their own impru dence, owing to their own misconduct—to the manner in which they sought to separate themselves from the whole body of the people, the manner in which they tried to do every thing unpo pular, and abstained from any thing which had ought of grace or popularity in it. (Hear, hear; from the ministerial benches.) He wished them to consider whether this was not the solution of the difficulty, and it would be well for them to bear in mind, when reflecting on this, that, while the majority in the other house had been steadily increasing, it was remarkable that iso lated elections had for the most part gone in their favour. There was another matter on which he wished to address a word to them They had been often told in the course of the present session that they (the peers) had with them, and against the ministry, the great majority of all who were respectable, of all who had power, weight, and influence—the great majority of the gentry, the great majority - of the clergy, and that they had with them distinctly the voice of the universities. He would not deny that this, perhaps, might be the truth, nor would he stop to inquire whether it was so or not; hut he implored them not to be too confident. 'He had the greatest respect for the gentry, and for the clergy he had no disrespect, nor did he feel any thing like to the universities. But let theirs depend upon it, all that would not suffice. (Hear, hear.) Those inter ests had been obliged to cede the palm of victory toothers, to yield to opposing and conflicting interests, and that even at a period when the interests of the urban population of commeice and of agriculture, the power of the dissenters, and the general influence of public opinion were as nothing in comparison to what they were now.. (Cheers.) He would tell their lordships that great measures had been carried in opposition to those in terests on which they relied; that dynasties had been subverted, families placed and maintained upon the throne (great cheer ing) in opposition to the fiat of the gentry, and most certainly, in opposition to the great majority of the clergy. (Cheers.) He earnestly entreated them to conciliate and unite together the interests and feelings of all classes of society; he entreated them to take the first step towards that consummation by acceding to, those amendments which had been sent up to them from the commons, and thus fixing their weight, their authority, their power, and their dignity in the feelings, and sympathies, .and affections of the people of Ireland, and at the same time those of this country. (Cheers.) The noble viscount concluded by moving that the commons' reasons and amendments be taken into consideration. Lord LYNDHURST commenced by remarking that the greater part of the speech of the noble vicount contained little more than apersonal attack upon himself. The course which he (Lord L.) followed with respect to catholic emancipation, he acted upon with men of as much honour, of as much attach ment to the constitution, as deeply read in the laws and history of Britain, as independent in their views and conduct as any body of men that ever existed in this country. (Cheers.) When that vast measure was adopted by the lords then in con nexion with him, it was adopted after a calm, cool, and delibe rate investigation of the whole question ; and because they felt it to be their duty to recommend to their sovereign the necessity of pursuing that course in the then state of the country. The noble viscount had stated that he (Lord L,) had said on a former night that the consequences , which resulted from that measure were contrary to the expectations which he had form ed. He repeated shat observation. His lordship said, io con tinuation, the consequences which have resulted from that mea sure, the conduct of those individuals who were parties, to it and who were eager for its accomplishment, have disappointed my expectations; and I cannot do better for the purp ose. o f I illustrating what mean on this occasion than to recall to your lordships' recollection a quotation made at that time; descriptive of the consequences that would result from granting the mekt sure of emancipation to the Roman catholics of Ireland :- - " Simul alba nautis . Stella refulsit, Defluit saxis agitatus humour : Concidunt venti, fugiuntque nubes, Et.minax, sic Di voluere, ponto . Unda recumbit." That was the quotation made for the purp6se of illustrating the consequences that would result from the passing of that mea• sure. Mark the effects which have flowed from . it, and say whether they are not directly the reverse of all that are denoted and indicated in the passage to which.l have referred. Step by step, since that time, encroachments have been madenpon 'the protestant establishment, and continued With pertinacious aril mosity, contrary to the pledges at that lime made as an eneou, ragement to pursue the course , we then adopted (Hear, hear.) The noble visconnt further goes on to say that at the time we, entered office, in 1834, we pursued a most unjustifiable course in advising his majesty to dissolve parliament. He made that. as a statement and an assertion, but upon what grounds he has advanced the statement, and what are the reasons assigned for the opinion, we are left in utter ignorance. ,What, my lords, can be more regular, what can be more just, what can be more in accordance with the principles of our free constitution than this—that when his majesty is advised to make a change in his councils, an appeal should be made to the sentiments and wishes of the people of England to sanction and support an act so done by his majesty? It was in accordance ritll that prin ciple, almost invariably acted upon on a similar occasion, that ministers then advised 'a dissoliition of parliament. It appears to me a constitutional course, a legislative course,.a wise a n d proper course to pursue. (Cheers.) - ' Thenoble viscount seems co conceive that Cie are to a certain extent bound to follow the opinions of the other house upon this subject. I beg leave to say that this house also represents the nation—that we are no less the representatives of the people; and I believe at this mo ment, whatever may be the noble viscount's opinion, that we as fully, and no less fairly, represent the opinions, the senti ments, the feelings of the great body of the nation as their re presentatives in the other house of iiarliarnent. (Cheers.) I. feel, and the noble viscount has expressed, the utmost 'possible respect.for the opinions of the other house, and 'whenever 1 have the misfortune to differ from them upon any Conclusion of state policy, and I am sure my noble friends around me itre,itn- Pressed:with the same conviction, I feel it to be my duty cautiously to deliberate and fully to consider that difference; but when am not entirely convinced by the reasons they allege, it is my duty, as an independent member of parliament, and of this house, to act according to the dictates of my tinbiassedludgment. That is the course I have pursued—the course which the nobl e lords with whom I am acting have, I am pe rsua d e d , p ursue d . It is because we feel the consequence of the measure as sent up to us originally by the other house, and presented to us in its amended form, would be productive of mischief to the united empire, and of great evil and calamity to Ireland itself, and that it would be fatal to the protestant interests of that country —it is because we are impressed with this conviction that we re fused to pass the bill in its,forrrier shape, and itis on the same grounds that we are disinclined to adapt the amendments now proposed to us. The noble vis Count empleyed the greater part of his speech , not with reference to the question before the house, but to the purpose tci tiPhich I have referred, and to what fell from me on a former night. I am extremely desirous of sayin g something to your lordships upon that subject. I am desirous of redeeming the pledge I gave with . reference to it, and I am conscious that I owe it income sort to your lordships. I feel that the censure heaped upon me, and the attacks di rected against me, are in some sort also directed against your lordships. First, as to my accusers. •The• first of my accusers in order of time was a gentleman, a member of the other house 'of parliament, who immediately after the bill was sent down to the other house, was sent off to Ireland as an apostle of agita tion for the purpose of creating a movement in that country. (Cheers and laughter.) Meetings were called, resolution's were prepared, justice to Ireland,—the usual topic—equality of civil institutions, and those words to which the noble viscount has alluded, aliens by descent or aliens by blodd, or sane expres sion of for the purposenf getting nately m , however, the plot did not little that a d t i ; o n we descantednrortti di up a entirely succeed. But that gentleman, wife .had been used ,to missions of this kind, was not without his'sanices:(a for, as has been stated in the course of the' evening, he threw another ingredient into the caldron which he knew was power ful in its operation. He created alittle bustle for a day or t wo whichwhichhowever,happily , it lbearno isenmity h t a ( p) that vocation (great layghter); and if I had shown any . enmity to hint, it would'have subsided almost in a inoment, fromthegreat pleasure I have derived'over and over a ga i n f rom h i s l i ght and brilliant eloquence, and above all from the abundant. amuse ment he has lately afforded me by his felicitous explanations, and the extraordinary drollery by which the end . of that state ment was accompanied. (Cheers and latighter.) Th at gen tleman was my first accuser. The next. my lords, was a man of a 'very different statnp, for nothing can he more strongly'cop 'trasted with the wolf-tetnpered Weapon of the gentlernan'ao whom have referred, than the coarse rusty flail (if I may si) express myself) if his associate. I have not powers o f de scription adequate to the task of painting him, but I wish . I were for the rnomentVossessed of these . which the noble viscount so eminently enicv.:'• I shall never forget, and,youilordships, Lan! sire, never will, the portrait which he drew oil a former night of this person—how he appeared wrapped in mystery, aria heralded by portents, visiting our planet once only in the revo lutions of a century-:those who gazed. upon him, doubtful Whe ther he ought to be considered as a benevolent or a malignant genitis s --" whether.. a spirit of health or goblin damned." Ac carding to the quotation of the noble viscount, the noble 16rd seemed 'almost as if he would say, Wrapped in a spirit, of ,ad joration, pursuing the quotation—" call thee king, father 1" wish I possessed the powers which the noble viscount displayed upon that occasion ; but this person has so scathed himself, - ha's so exhibited himself in a variety of postures,. not always the most seemly and decent, amidst the shouts and applause of a multitude, that all description on my part is totally unnecessary. But these:exhibitions have not been bootless to hiin ; he has re ceived lavish contributions (cheers,) I may say ducal (loibi cheers and laughter,) from the connexions of the present govern ! merit, while at the same time he has wrung by the aid - of the priests the miserable pittance from the hands of the starving and famishing peasant: , (Loud: cheers.) This person has in every shape and form insulted your lordships, your lordships' house, and many of you individually—he has denounced you, doomed you todestruction,.and then, availinghimsell of your courtesy, he comes to your lordships' bar, where he listens to your proceedings, and he marks and he measures you as his victims—•'Etiara in senatum venit—notat, designatque oculis ad cmdem unurnquern que nostram." (Cheers.) The person to whom these expres sions were applied had at least one redeeming quality—witness the last scene of his life, if you read it in the description of the historian- Mindful of his former elevation and dignity, so able, so politic, so eloqiient, he ever retained the virtue of courage. (Great cheering, and the eyes of several noble lords were di rected towards the bar.) Where was this accusation made and under what circumstances? At a meeting of the inhabitants of Middlesex, where those friends of free institutions, those de- • claimers for justice—eternal justice—for the edification of his audience, vented his coarse and scurrilous. jests at the murder of nmonarch, and at the same time, and almost in the same breath, insulted by the insidious venom of his flattery the suc cessor of that monarch, our present .most gracious Sovereign. Such is the , man who has assailed me, such the circumstances under which the assault was made. cAnothet assailant, to whom I must ,allude, is one of 'some gentler demeanour, of bland speech, of most amiable manners, a little too strongly tinctured with ultra-liberalism. When I say the individual to whont I am now referting is my assailant, I mean that he is my reported accuser; for allow use to be incredulous on the' subject, and. I am quite sure that you will share thatincredulitywith me. The no'ule lord to whom I refer has long been a member of the other house of parliament. As a whig.he must have studied the con stitution and forms of that.house. As the leaderof it, it is his duty,particularly to attend to the order and regularity of 'its proceedings. Ele.is a writer on theconstitution, and knowsjhe importance of preserving the independence of the two houses of parliament. Is itsossiblei: then,nto , suppose that a pers6n so circurnstanced,should, availinehithself of, your lordship? pour.. tesy, come to.the bar of this house, collect words spoken in the heat oldebate, and, then going to the other house, there repeat them, and attack and, denounce the speaker of them. (Hear, ,hear.) that,possible ? Am I not doing' justice to the noble lord insupposing that he could not so have acted? But this is not all 1 have another ground for my incredulity. I long had the honour of a seat in the other house ,of pailiathent, and I know well, from my.nbservation of the conduct of the righthon. gentleman who then filled the chair, that if any• individual, whatever his situation in that house might have been, had Come from ; your lordships' bar repeating .and attempting to observe upon what he had heard there, he would instantly have been called to order, . (Hear.) • I am now speaking of •past times. (Laughter.) But I know the right hon. gentleman, who at the present .moment occupies the chair of the other house of parlia ment, and am proud to call hinnany friend. He is a lawyer by profession, and sat for many years on the whig side of the house, and therefore must of necessity be acquainted with constitutional law and practice. I cannot, then, but suppose that he would have interfered for the purpose of checking a proceeding of so much irregularity as that which has been attributed to the noble .lord. This is my second ream:info! , being incredulous on the subject. But, my bolds, I have yet another reason. The noble - lord to whom I allude, the Secretary of State for the Home De partment, presides in some sort over the justice of the country. He must be well acquainted with the first principles of justice, and no principle was more sacred than this—that a man should not be put-on his trial in his absence. (Hear, hear.) I can not, therefore, easily believe that the .noble lord would have made such a charge in a place where it was impossible for me to answer it. lam not defending the noble lord; lam stating reasons for believing that the observations attributed to the noble lord never could have fallen from him. I cannot, I repeat, imagine that the noble lord had made a charge against mein my absence, when, of course, 1 had no opportunity of replying to it, or ef, explaining my meaning. (Hear, hear.) lam the more confirmed in this opinion, when 1 recollect that that noble lord is the author of a dramatic work, in which the grand inquisitor is made to boast of the fair manner in which his court is con ducted, in comparison with ordinary courts. He observes that au act of accusation even is not allowed to issue against a person until he has been heard in his defence. The poetical lines, my lords, are these : , . " It does nothold its prisoners accused Till they themselves are heard." (Laughter;) I do therefore think, that if that noble lord had intended to make a charge against me, he would, in common courtesy, and in accordance with the 'ordinary rules - which prevail in both houses of parliament, certainly in this, and formerly in the other, not have done so without first giving me notice, in order that I might have bad, if necessary, communication on the subject with some member of the other house. (Hear, hear.) These are the reasons whiehinduce me not to give credit to the report of a charge and accusation. having been made against pie by the noble lord: Now, asao the charge itself, what is it ? •It is this —that I stated as a reason for not granting municipal institu tions to the Irish, that ," they were aliens by descent, that they spoke a different language , . and had different habits from outs; that they considered •us to be invaders of their soil, and were desirous of removing us frOm the country." 1 made no such statement, nor did I say anything at all resembling it. No ex pressions ever fell from me upon which any person, not of a weak intellect, or not disposed to misunderstand and missepre sent what I stated, could have put such a construction. (Hear.) That this was the case is obvious, I think, from the conduct of h the n rnnueb; do noble lords on the o opposite. eca oNnV whenhat did it is h the said,n ola those e 8 ( wikleerle utteredwade n o b y commentme? He remainedwhatever on perfectlywhat are quietaow considered i n his pla as es most ,and extraordinary and unjustifiable expressions. Hear; hear.) Th e noble marquis who, it will be remembered, took so active a part in those debates, remained equally silent. •In fact, no notice at all was taken of what fell from me on the occasion alluded' to, and no such feeling was then excited as attempts have been since made to raise. (Hear, bear.) It is true that the noble marquis some fourteen days afterwards, and subsequent to the scenes which were got up in Ireland, and before the inhabi tants of Marylebone r made some allusion to what he called "never to be forgotten expressions." [The Marquis of Lans downe.—lt was only a few days after the discussion that I al luded to them.] It was a great many days after, for it was on the occasion, as your lordships will recollect, of my presenting a petition from a Roman catholic priest. The noble marquis then referred to those words, either in `censure or in compli ment, expressing his regret that I had used them, and his hope that I would explain them. I replied that I had nothing to ex plain, and that I would satisfy Your lordships that I had never made the statement attributed - to me. The charge against me has been repeated this evening by the noble viscount opposite. Now ' ,let me direct, your lordships attention to the statement really made by me, every word of which Lavin completely jus tify. It was frequently asked during the debates 'on the Irish municipal bill, and on the occasion to which allusion has been particularly made, ".Willou deny to Ireland what you have granted :to England ?" What was the .auswer eiven to that question? It was thi s —th a t th e m i n i s t ers t h ems elves have in their own bill proceeded' on ,the principle of applying different provisions to Ireland, and have refused, in consequence of the peculiar state of Ireland, to (srant the same powers to the 'lrish municipal corporation s as they granted to the English corpora tions. (Hear.) One of ,the arguments which I used on the - evening alluded to was to this effect —.that it was absurd, unless the state . of. society in the two countries could be shown to be the same, to say that the institutions which are: good in the one country must necessarily be good in the other; and. 1 illustrated my meaning by a kind of school-boy reference . to• the bed of Procrustes. Again, the ministers proposed to abolish the present corporations in Ireland,: for what reason ? Because, they are-party institutions, and therefore productive of evil. I observed, that there were two parties in Ireland much embittered against each other; and that the establishment of new corporations after the ministerial plan would be a substi tution 'of party corporations of a new sort, 'in lieu of those which might be abolished. That was my argument, and that led legitimately and properly to a deScription of the two parties in Ireland. And what was the description I gave of them ? Ido not flinch from it: trepeat it. On the one side,' I Said, there is one-fourth of the popul a tion o f E ng li s h d escent an d habits, protestant in religion, and adhering warmly to the con nexion with this country. Isahat 'an 'accurate deseription of one of these parties? '('Heer, hear.) • Whoavere on the other side? Persons of a different, and,' with regard to the English party to whom I referred, of an alien descent: The sense in which these words were used are quite obvious. They differ to a great extent in manners, language,..habits, and religion, and they'look on us as invaders. I admit that I said they were anxious for a separation and desirous to drive us from the coun try. Is this, or is it not, a correct description of the two parties in Leland? (Loud cries of " Hear.") When I gave that de scription lat least acted fairly. Iso thought, and so consider ed; and who, my lords, were my instructors? Those persons who now denounce and accuse me. They were rny instructors. (Cheers.) Who is it that whenever it suited his . purpose worked on the feelings and prejudices, arising out of a differ ence of desCent, that called the protestants of Ireland foreign ers, Saxons, SassenaChs? (11ear, hear.) Who is it that has over and overagain, whenever it - suited hiS particular object, declared that he never would cease to excite one portion of the population against the other, " As long as popish spade and scythe • " Shall dig and cat the Sassenach's tithe?" Who is it that has applied, with the same view of exciting a feeling of hostility and antipathy, the term " Sassenach" to a noble lord, formerly secretary for Ireland, 'and received from that noble individual such au infliction as recalled to one's re collection. the lines in ancient fable— _ " Clarn:inti cutis est'summos derepta per artus, " Neequicquam nisi vulnus erat ?" Who is it, again, that has denominated this imperial parliament, t both by word of month and in writings, a foreign parliament— r has called this house an Assembly of foreigners, and .aptdied the same term to the protestant sof Ireland ? (Hear, hear.) Who is it, that in reference to this very parliament, has made use of the term alien?' He who is now my accuser. ,(Hear, hear.) - This is my defence, if defence be necessary. ( Hear, hear.) • Who is it, but another of my accusers, that, speaking of Ire land, described the Irish and the English to be divided against each other, with enmity even stronger than that felt by the Welch mountaineers for their Saxon invaders? Who told us that this enmity was not the consequence of a difference of re ligion, but was hereditary- 7 -that it existed when the two parties were of the same religion? One of my accusers. (Hear, hear.) So mnch,'then, as to the description of the two parties into which , Ireland is divided. And now as to the use. of the term "invaders." Who is it that called the English. invaders of Ireland; that dated the misery and degradation of that country from the fit st day when the English banner was plant ed on its soil? Who is it that called the " union" an atroci ous and most abominable measure ; that pledged himself over and over again to repeal that " union," though every man knows, and no one better than the indiYidual I refer to, that the repeal of the union is in fact the entire and total separa tion of the two countries ? Who is it that told Ireland that it should N.ot be a petty and paltry province, but a free and inde pendent nation, and that the Saxoni should be taught that lesson? My accuser. 'misery for repeal was now dropped, his exertions suspended; but on what terms. and conditions ? Mark ! " Justice to Ireland, " And 'what description has that individual, within a very Small space of time, given ofthe mean ing he attaches to, the words. "Justice to Ireland ?" It is this,' ma lords=the complete and entire government of that country by Roman Catholics, the extinction of tithe in any shape or 'form,. the introrluction'or the voluntary system, and the entire demolition , of the protestant establishment in Ireland. These are . :ternis—the terms on which alone 'is content to lay aside 'his exertions at present , . or the r e p ea l o f the union . , and.. the j .,sparAttan at ..Ireland. (Cheer s .) His lordship next aerended the alterations made by that house in the bill. The obje,Cts,of the bill: as originally sent from the commons, were to abolish corporations in. Ireland, to create . • others in their place, and to Vest -in the crown the disposal of every office connected with the administration of justice. It wasasseited-tfiift their lordships hail - returned to the ceinunons another and a different hill. Was that true ? Surely not ; for out oft. hesethree.ohjeets - they had consented to .carry into ef fect the'fiiit an I the list; and had only provided a substitute for the second.' It was alSo made a subject of grievous- complaint that their lordships had altered the title of the bill; but if they consulted their journals they would find that this was not an unusual practice. In the case of Grampound, the commons . passed a hill disfranchising that borough, and transferred its two members to Leeds. The lords agreed to the first object of that bill, but substituted for the second. the. addition of two knights of the shire for Yorkshire. This change rendered it necessary to alter the preamble of the bill, which was accJrd ingly altered. When the bill was sent back 'to'the commons it was objected that it could not be received,-because it had n o t' . . • .... I ..„. ieen amended, but made an original bill.. A noble lord, how 'ever, combated that Objection, and the bill as amended was re ceived: Who was that noble lord !—Why, the noble lord who now led the nainister;al party in the Hoose of Commons. The learned lord; after adverting to the amendments of the com mons, concluded thus :—I have now only to say a few words on the other part of the bill, giving new corporations to 12 towns in Ireland. This subject has been so often considered, that it would be unpardonable in me again to discuss it. , t am satis fied that if your lordships should adopt this part of the measure, it would be productive of the greatest possible evils. The ori ginalpreinible of the bill states the object aimed at to be, good and quiet government. Do you believe that by adopting the provisions of this bill, the towns affected by it would be well and quietly governed ? Would the introduction of annual elections, carried on as elections are in Ireland, tend to order and good government, or to tumult, strife distraction, and party and re ligious animosity ? (Hear.) What would be the constitution of these cOrporations? I repealthe argument which in the be ginning of the diSeusSionS on this subject„ I urged, and with which I will conclude them—that it would be absiirdiafter get ting rid of the present corporations, because they are nuisances, are partyinstitutions, to establish in their . place party institu 7 tions of ritiature.infinitelY, more objectionable and mischievous. (Hear, hear.) This is my . great ground of objection to the present measure.. To what purpose would the new corporations be applied? Do not the people who govern Ireland-bay that every measure must be earned by agitation ; .and when a diffi culty is felt in effecting any object, do they not exclaim " Agi tate ! agitate! agitate?" If, then, their party should get pus session Of the government of these large ,towns,.would they. not be. converted into the most destructive engine* of agitation, and most pernicious as far as the protestant, interest is • concerned? (Hear, lea'r.) But is not this the object of the bill ? Does not the measure speak for itself? . Let your lordships look to its - provisions. Why did the noble viscount create Dow corpo rations by this bill ? Solely for the purpose, es he has-said, of creating them. At present the corporations, have nothing to do except to administer justice. The new corporations would he deprived of all power in !hat respect. The business Of watch ing,. paying, arol 'lighting, forms no part of the duties of the ex isting torporations ; that it is all performed by trustees under local acts of parliament, and is well and effectively performed. What, then, remains' fOr the new corporations to do ?—abso , lutely nothing, as the noble viscount has stated himself; but in Order to give their' something to do, it is proposed to abolish the local trusts, and to make the corporators the trustees. (Hear.) Is it not evident, when those behind the noble viscount, who push and goad him forward, making him come down to your lordships' house and utter such extravagant speeches as the one he has delivered this night--is it not evident that their design is to have these-corporations as places of deposit for the purposeof agitation, -whenever agitation may be necessary to gain any particular object ? (Hear.) If 1 were one of those disposed to say that tithes should be extinguished, that they should not be paid in any shape, that the voluntary system should be established, that the Protestant religion should be annihilated, and that; -as the last step, the "union" should be repealed, as the consequence and climax of those measures, I would assent to the bill as it has come up from the other house • I would do -more—l would say, let the whole thing be accomplished at once; let us not go step by step. If you pass this measure, will you then ship ?; It. will be impossible for you to do so. (Hear.) -Does - not every concession you make add power to one party, and render it more difficult to resist the next demand ? ( Hear, hear.) It is be cause I-foresee that at no distant period this measure would lead to the Consequences I have stated, because those consequences; are in my mind deplorable, destructive to the interest, indepen denne; and integrity of the empire, that. I. oppose the noble viscount in this step which he proposes to take. (Cheers.) I Will not take this first step,—a step. of of peace and conciliation, which will make everything afterwards quiet. but advance .the accomplishment of any design that may be entertained for the subversion of the Protestant 'religion,. (Cheers.). 1 have con sidered them with calmness, with caution, and to the , best of my ability. I entertain, as I said when I,set out, the greatest possible respect for the other house of .parliament—anything connected with or belonging to myself I would at once surrender to them; but, my lords, I am here one at least of the guardians . of the interests of the empire (hear, hear,) and Lfeel that it is' a duty ‘ l owe to my country, whatsoever may be the consequences, and satisfied that the consequences of .the measure now pro pounded-will be such as I have pointed out, to oppose the motion of the noble viscount opposite. (Loud cheer's.) The Marquis of Clanricarde and Viscount Falkland supported the motion. The -Earls of Ripon and Winchelsea spoke in favour of the amendment. Earl GREY addressed the house at some length. He was opposed to' the destruction of corporations, and suggested cer tain modification's which he thought would remove the evils apprehended from a preponderance of the catholic party in the new boroughs. He was of opinion that the house should yield nothing to threats and intimidation. His lordship said, if he thought that it was the intention to force:from their lordships, by threats and intimidation, anything that it would. be such to concede, he should b e th e fi rs t man t o oppose a resistance as it might be in his power to make. He was anxious for the honour of their lordships' house—he was anxious 'to maintain that just influence which could only be derived from the general respect of the people, by their lordships' exercising for the people's benefit those high privileges which were not granted as a distinction to themselves, but as the means of so acting. lf, therefore, any attack was made upon their lordships' honour, or upon their deliberate power, he should be one of the first to resist it; for he adhered to that sentiment which had been often quoted, sometimes for praise and sometimes for cen sure—viz., that he felt bound to support the order to which he belonged against any unjust attack that might be made. upon it. It was unnecessary to say that he should resist any attempt to force upon the house any measure of which their lordships disapproved—any measure which would not be a re form of the house, but a destruction of the house and the monarchy, and, if all experience were not false, of the freedom of the people themselves. To any reform of that kind he should be happy to serve in the ranks which oppose the most deter mined resistance. The other speakers were Lord Ellenborough, Lord Holland, the Duke of Wellington, the Duke of Richmond, Lord Wharn cliffe, and Viscount Melbourne in reply. When their lordships divided on the original motion there appeared— Present. Proxies. 75 48 142 78 Content Not content Total. 123 220 Majority against the motion 97 Lord ELLENBOROUGH moved the appointment of a committee to draw up the reasons why their lordships differed from the amendments of the Commons. The committee was appointed; and ordered to meet on the following day at 4 o'clock. Lord ELLENBOROUGH expressed a hope that those reasons would be drawn up by Wednesday, and submitted to the House Of Commons' with the least possible delay.—Adjourned. THE LI'VERPOOL STANDARD. HOUSE OF' COMMONS.-MONDAY. Several petitions were presented to the house, among them Mr. P. M. STUART presented a petition signed by an im mense number of merchants of Glasgow, complaining of a con • travention of the treaty regarding Java. .By that treaty, where Dutch goods were introduced duty free, those of England were, not to paY more than 6 per cent. ; but by encroachments,. English goods were now saddled w ith a duty of 25 per cent. Lord PALsiErtsTort said that the alteration undoubtedly was not "conformable to treaty;. but that he had no doubt, on further representationS being made to the Dutch government, that it would do what was right and remedy this just complaint. BUSLNESS OF THE. HOUSE • . . Lord J. RussELLmoved that after July 1, all orders of the day have precedence of notices of motions, because, his lordship said, it was "important to have their bills in the House of Lords before August next." The regulation was adopted. The house then once more went into committee on the regis tration of voters bill, in the course of which, Sir R. Piur.., referring to the clause regarding the appoint ment of revising barristers, complained that they were likely to be Made political appointments, which ought to be averted, as they might largely influence elections all over the country; and that on the report, he should call further attention to the sub ject, contenting himself with now stating that he should prefer the appointments to be vested in the Lord Chancellor instead of the Houle Secretary. Several new clauses and amendments were proposed in the committee. The tithes bill, (England) after an extended conversation, and the disposing of some amendments, was read a third time and paSsed. The sugar duties bill went throuali a committee, as did the horse patrol bill.—Adjourned. HOUSE OF LORDS. TUESDAY. Evidence was heard at the bar in support of the Stafford Dis. franchisement bill. • RAIL ROADS. The Duke of IlticitinoNn presented the first report of the railroad committee which was ordered to be received.' The ether bills before the house were each forwarded a stage. Adjourned to Thursday—yesterday. HOUSE OF COMMONS. TUESDAY. The House was chiefly occupied in the reception of petitions, and in railway discussions. • Lord JeHN RUSSEI4, brought in a bill to abolish personal tithes. The registration of births bill was read a third time and passed. The marriages bill was also read a - third time and passed. The house adjourned at two o'clock. CURIOUS APPROPRIATION OF PENALTIES UNDER AN ACT OP PAHLIAMENT,—By a singulaT.. oversight iu the wording of the act fur the better regulation of ,parish registers, 52d Geo. 111. cap . 146, the following whimsical arrangement occurs with re gard to the penalties imposed upon persons found guilty of of fending against the provisions thereof. Sec..l4 provides that any person or persons tionvictesk,Of making false entries in re gister books, or copies of entries in such books, or of destroying or m utilating any of such books.or entries, shall be adjudlied guilty of felony and transported for fourteen years"—exception being made,te cases of accidental alteration, &c. if duly and timely rectified. This, it may ,be observed, is the only "tine or penalty" impesed by the act in question; and section 17 enacts that " One half of the amount of all : fines and penalties to be le vied id pursuance of this act shall ga to the person who shall in form or sue Jar the same!" rThe informer would be,-co'nse quently, entitled to seven years transportation !1 "And the "remainder ,j the fine, if imposed on a church or chapel-warden, shall go to the poor of the parish" in which the fpnce shall be committed ! ! LThis easy mode of reducing parish-rates might furnish a hint to - some of o ur , mo d ern "f art hi ng -candle and c h ee se save all" calculators.] And lastly, "if imposed on any rector, vicar, minister, curate, or registrar, the remainder of the 'fine shall be applied to such charitable uses within the pa rish'as shall be directed by the bishop"! ! ....• A gentleman residing within twelve miles of Brigg, abou eleven years ago,.sold a horse to a stranger, at one of the Bar ton fairs, for £l4. A few days since the same horse was sold again, to its original owner, for the same sum of money, after a lapse of, so many years; and though the circumstance 'Was not then known to the purchaser,. he has' sinew discoVered his sad Mistake;.--the horse is now twenty-three years old r=—Lincoln Gazette. • At present, there are five of the eig,ht coining -presses at work on 'the coinage of the new silver fourpence. Each press is ,ca pable of coining seventy per minute, or on the average about four-thousand an hour • so that supposituz them to he. at w or k, ten hours, each day, the daily produce of the five would be equali to two hundred thousand, or one million two hundred thousand, a week. LIVERPOOL CORN WHEAT, ty 70115. s d s d English, new red, 7 3 a 7 9 Do. Old 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. new white Do. old 0 0.. 0 0 Scotch, white 0 0.. 0 0 Do. red Irish, new red Do.'old 6 1 .. 6 8 Do. new white Do. old Da Do r e e d. . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stettin, red 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. white: ..... 0 0.. 0 0 Conigsherg, red 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. white Riga& Petersburg -0 0.. 0 0 Odi.ksm -- o'o .. 0 0 Russian, hard 0 - 0 .. 0 0 Canada, - red - 0 - 0 .. 0 0 Do: =white Bonded - Wheat' '3 - 6 .. 4 - 8 IZYnlimp:qr. English and Foreign, free 0 0 0 0 Do. in bond 0 0 0 0 - En , f,dish;Malting...34 0 .. 37 0 Do. Grinding,6oth 3 8 .. 311 Irish, Malting, do. 0 - 0 0 - 0 Do. Grinding, do. 4 2 ..- 4 4 Porejga, d. p. do.' 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. in bond 0 0 0 0 OATS, V 4595. EngliAh,•new . 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. old 0 0 .. 0 0 Scotch, &c new 0 0 .. 0 0 Do. oil WOODVILLE'S ,CIGAR MmiuFec-rouy.--7Hiring a o/arttec I set off to visit the celebrated manufactory ,of Woodville, whose cigars - me now known all - over 1161 - vorld.- The establishment „ was•some distance from the_city gates—lle country through which I passed . possessed nothing very,,reniarkable to recOm•:. mend it to notice, with the exception of some extensive.gardens filled with exquisite-looking fruit, and flowers of a ,sigg and brilliancy of colour, exceeding any thing "I had ever seen in the choicest conservatories in England: Arrived at my destina tion, I encountered many of my:brother officers engaged in selecting cigars ; my•object was to obtain a quantity. ota.:,parti cular' snuff.; for which the honie was-fained. I experienced great civility from one of the overseers'of' these extensive pre mises, who escorted me over theiii: Under long open sheds were seateif, - each at aleriarate able, a number of negroes,_ and the leaf ancl,cut tobacco was supplied.to.them . ;:gy young black urchins, who skipped about with-intretlihle---activizty,,consider ing the state'of; the •atniosphere; 'upon a porticin , of 'flattened leaf enough of the cut herb, was placed,. and.. then; by:tlie-aPpli ' cation of the wet fingers of the Operator,•vvhose:saliva was in constant requisition. these materials - were speedily rolled into a cigar, the twist at the . top being gi;en by placing it between the back teeth. In - spite of the, disgust I feltr.at thus - , leuriiing the art andinystery of - their"fabrication,:l, Vsloght,sorne bundles 6f the " best yellOws,!Land a few-of the smaller sort, called cabillos, so, extensively patronised iby the ladies of Cuba,, Recollections of un Artillery Officer, by B. F. Hill. ii - i_;ipertrs, AFRICA. Experiment, Hamilton, frcim Tetuan, with 130 his sheeps' wool, C Hamilton—S Dk WEST INDIES AND MADEIRA James Bailie, Taylor from Jamaica, with 4 lids 50 tcs 21 brls sugar, 62 puns 15 lids rum, 7 tcs coff ee , 123 b r l s g i nger, 38 t logwood, 241 logs mahogany, 39.10 gs cedar, 848 lancewood spars, .1 Mulhulla'nd and co -20 brls ginger, 15 t rustic, 48 logs cedar, 413 lance Wood spars ; 1 bx rtd goods, Order—G bk . Sandbach, Bispham, from Demerara, with 478 hds sugar, 23 puns 30 ' hds 40 brls rum, 28 brls 193 hags coffee, No Consignee-118 hds sugar, 22 puns 20 hds rum, C S Parker-1 brl runt, .1 Bowes-2 bris sugar, 2 bgs coffee, J Bispham-6 bxs sundries, Order.—W Dk Wilsons, Norman. from Demerara, with 144. hds 10 tea 1 brl sugar, 108 puns 34 hds 25 brls rum, 111 eks molasses, 171 bags coffee, 1 hd 5 cs Mad wine, T and II 111urrav ,2 -25 lids sugar, Wilson and Cort-6 do, J Bolton-15 do, 30 brls rum, Waterhouse and Sons-3 logs timber, 1 box preserves, Order—W Dk • UNITED STATES. Star, Glover, I'm New York, with 665 bIS cotton, W and J Brown -49 do, Rathbone Bros and co-100 do,Brown Bros-52 do, Wainwright and co-199 do, T W Smith-and co-39 do, Hagarty and J, e'r(lein-9 J and S Cassin-61 do, Wildes, Pick ersg ill, and no—;-200 do, T Wilson and coL-50 do. 80 shooks, Order—GDk IVaverley, Phillips, from Mobile, with 848 bls cotton, Phelps, James and co-100 do; Crary, Fletcher and co-213 do, NV and J Browri and co-165 do, Keill and Courant —233 do, Wainwright and Sheils-21 do, Wilson and co-75 logs red cedar; H and W Anderson—G Dk Shannon, Wilden, from Mobile, with 1004 bls cotton, Order—Q-Dk Waltham, Sheldon, from Savannah, with 350 bls cotton, Sands, Hodgson and co-250 do, E FrodSharn-152 do,-Fisher Bros-12a do, Wainwright and co•-•-• 17 do, Baring Bros and co—K Dk Oxford,.Minott, from Savannah ; with 224 bls cotton, Keill and Cou rant-66 do, Fisher Bros and co-636 do, Order—Q Dk • Colehester, M'Lean, from Mobile, with 1403 his cotton, Bolton, Og den and . co--100 do, Brown BrOs-233 do, Phelps, Jathes and co-130 do, Order-285 logs cedar, H and W Anderson—G Dk • Sheffield, Allen; from New York, with 662 bls cotton, T Wilson and co-899. bids turpentine, T Todd-100 do, Bancroft,- Dentith and co,- 3 t horn tips, J Goodwin--6 puns, 1 iron camboose, P W Byrnes-2 bls ni'dize fonts unkn, Order—NV Dk Columbus, Palmer, from New - York, with 1500 brls turpentine, T Todd-630 wet salted hides, Dennistoun and co-344 his cotton, Rath bone Bros and co-155 do, Cropper, Benson and co-125 do,Collinann, Lambert and co-76 do, Wainwright and 'co-3 bds'tobacco, A Carri gan-3 do, Cazneau and co-400 hides, H Itigg=s t horn tips, Sands, Hodgson and co--1 cse coats unku,-J Wallis-1 do, T B Colborne-1 do, R S Mackenzie-1 do, J Close and co-1 do, J Hadwen and co--4 do, .Sands, Hodgson and co-5 do, Order— bdl hware, G Wright and co—l 9 bdis shook and hoop 4, 5 bdls heads; Fitzhugh and Grimshaw— a qty shooks, hoops, and -heading, Robinson Bros—P Dk George WashingtOn,.Holdrege, from New York, with 310 bls cotton, Collniann, Lambert and co- 1 266 do,•Wildes, Pickersgill and co-793 brls turxentine, T Todd-1 ble books, ShewoOd and co— WDk MEDITERRANEAN. British Union, Storm, from Smyrna, with 167 bls madder roots, 11S `Ws sheeps' wool, 7 his silk, 2 bls yarn, 1 ble carpets, 6.cs gum, 30, t emery stone, 40 t valonea, Order L-25 his madder roots, .1" Davies-72 do, 3cs gum, 1 cse drugs, J Maclaurin-4 t boxwood, 20 his madder roots, J Spence, Son and co—. 0 t barwood, Masteri—S Dk Brandon, Lewis, from Tetuan and Gibraltar, with (from Tetuan) 401, mats wool, J Carver and co(from Gibraltar),7s bags and mats wool, .I'Citiiier and coK Dk %Mary Anne, Piess, from Gibraltar, with 323 bls washed Wool, Carve , . and co-1 case m'dize rebl, Order-- Dk • - James,. Marshall, from Gibraltar, with 123 mats, 148 bags woo: I'rescott Bros and co-86 bags corks, J Murisoa—li Dk • EUROPE. Det Gode Haab, Fesker, from Kiel, with 530 qrs peas, W Lowe— Queen's Dock. Phoenix, Matthiessen, from Heiligenhafen, with 1100 qrs oats Order-Q Pk - Agathe Catherina, Moller, from Iceland, with 2 t bones, said Mas. ter—Q Dk ;1.- - blpptng fnulttgatte. TUESDAY, JUNE 23.—N00n, Wind variable and light. ARRI vED.—Star, Glover, from New York—Phcenix,Matthewson, fm Teilegenhaven—Preston, Rickard, from Dublin. HOWIMuI, Aiken, for New York. Tyro, Carter; and Sports man , H u t c hinson, hence, at Mo n t e Vid eo , President, Chadwick, from London, at New York. " Planter, Scott, from Belfast, at ditto. , Kingston, Law; Pursuit, Alexander, from Dundee, at Charleston.' Emanuel, Dearness, from London, at Philadelphia. Fairy, Turnley-, from Madeira for St. Petersburgh, off Weymouth. • Trader, Cullen 'hence, for London, at Holyhead, with loss of rud der, and leaky, having been on the - rocks: - James Bailie, from Jamaica, was off Point Lynas at 8 a.m. Naw YORK, May9.,--A.large brig was.seen. ashore about 30 miles S. of the high laud 17thillt. , . . • • - WEDNESDAY, Julie 29.—N00n, Wind W. to N.W.—Light. Auaato—The Giorgio, Costa, from Palermo—James, Marshall, from Gibraltar—Shannon,. Wilden", from. Mobile—Aldbro', Storey, from Rotterdatn.• • SAILED- 7 -Albion, Putnam, for Canton—Bombay Packet, Garnock; for Bourbay—llygOia ; Lucy, for Calcutta—Euphrates, Emerson, for Bucksport, A.S.—Republic, Williams, and Ganges, Jones, for New York—Emma, Maine, for Naples,-&c. • Plata, M'Kenzie, hence, at Madeira. Fairlield,Clarke. hence, at Jamaica. Pigeon (Vacket) from Falmouth at Barbadoes, previous to 12th tilt. ells, ampbell, and Orpheus; BUrsley, hence, at New York, 9th instant. Dash, Hawkins ; Mary, Bell; Ariadne, Susan, Watkins, hence, at .Constantinople.. Valparaiso, Eagle, hence, at Bourdeaux. . VroW Anna, Langhete, and Twee Gebroeders, Michelsen, hence, a Antwe - rp., Maria Margaretha, Frers, hence, at Bremen. Jantina Engelina, De Jonge ; Engelina, Bok ; Annette, Ouwehard and Henriette, Hundt, hence, at' Helvoet. Libra, Martin, frOm Jacinel, at Hamburgh. COunteis of Lonsdale, Groom, from Matanzas, at ditto. - Angelina, Dieppedalle, hence, at flonileur. Robert and James, Crow, hence, at Liebau. Margaretta Johanna, Wallis, hence, at Pillau. Hilda, Juhr ; Vrow Neltje, Farrel, and Triton, Moller, hence, al Swinnemunde. Jblan Guise, M'Fee, hence, at St. Petersburgli. • Erhgrossherz Paul, Buck, hence, at Warnemuncle. Elenora, Fradland ; Auguste Frederick, Zaage, and Dido, Mundt hence, off ditto.. Einigkeit, Vanselow, and Wilhelmine, Kreplin, hence, at Wismar. Schleicher, Bentzien, hence, at Wolgast. Fidelity, Makinson, from St. John, N.B. at Belfast. Monk, Herbert, from Leghorn, at Dublin. lanthe, Langley, from Mtramichi, at Limerick. Charles Hamerton, Reynolds, from Gonaives at Falmouth. Enmore, Swainson, from Canton, at London. Lady Normanby, Teasdale, from Havana, at Portsmouth. The Francis Spaight, Gormon, from St. John, N.B. to Limerick, which was abandoned 3d Dee. last, has been towed into Fuerteven. tura, one of the Canary Islands. The James Bailie, .Taylor, from Jamaica, at this port, sailed from Montego Bay, 11th alt, Left-loading. the Alexander, Eden, David Lyon, and Hymen, for London. The Rapid s a il e d 7th u lt . for London. MONTREAL, May 21.—The Ottawa, Boyle, from Quebec, to London, was lost op Anticosti, Ist Dec. Passenmers and crew, except the mate and one man, saved. and Black Eyed NEw YottE . , .ItneS.—The Brothers, Potts, from St. Andrew 73, N.B. to Dublin, was driven on shore near West Quoddy Head, 13th ult. and filled with water, but was afterwards got off. DUNDALK, June 25.—The Bruckton, Marshall, hence, for London, hat been towed in. here with loss of rudder, having struck on Duuary Point. HataFax, May 30.—The Columbus, Orton, from Quebec to Hull, was abandoned 27th Nov. off Cape . Chat. Crew saved by the Robert, Gardner, from Quebec to Lancaster, which was totally lost on_ the 2d Dec. in St. George's Bay: The master, one man, and a boy drowned. —The Woodman, Watson, from Quebec to Hull, was totally lost in St George's Bay in November, crew saved.—The Teviotdale, Johnstone, from - London, to Quebec, was driven on shore at Wild's Cove, near Little Loran, Cape Breton, 16th inst. and sold; crew saved. THURSDAY, JUNE 30.—Noon Wind S.W.—Moderate. ARRIVED—CctIchis, Knight ; New Jersey, Barstow, and Louisa, Boning, from New York. OFF—Planter. —, from Jamaica. Hannah, -----, hence ' for Montreal, at Cove. Robert King, Thomas, hence, for Philadelphia, at Derry. Agnes, Roebuck, hence; at New Orleans. Spey - , Hodgson, from Hick's Island, at the Clyde ; sailed 17th May, left discharging brig Milo, of Liverpool. 19th June, in lat. 53 28, lon, 15 :0, spoke the Formosa. ---, from Londonderry, to New York, Don Juan . , Johnstone, from Barbadoes, off Cork. • Science, M'Lellan, from New Orleans, at the Clyde. • Heroine, Johns, from Calcutta, at Copenhagen. Edgecumbe, Dugdale, from Pernambuco, at Trieste. Tempis, Storich, from Bahia, at ditto. New Jersey, Barstow, filial New,York, at this port ; sailed 7th inst. off Cape Clear spoke the Archer, from Barbadoes, for this port. TELEGRAPH OFFICE, JUNE 30, 1836. Wind at Holyhead S.W.—Light breeze. • Off Holyhead, outward-bound at 12 noon No. 1635, Republic, A.S. for New York—No. 01, Hygela, B.S. for Calcutta. Off Holyhead, inward-bound, at 1 p.m.—No. 44, Eliza Heywood, 8.8. from Sincapore, 1124, Herald, steamer, from Cork, at 6 30, p.m. Off Point Lynas, inward-bound, at 9 a.m.—No. 945, Archer, Bk, from New Orleans—No 130, Hindoo, Bk, from Demerara. Off Point Lynas, outward-bound, at 7 a.m.—No. 41, Bombay Packet, B.S. for Bombay. Off Great Ormshead, inward-bound, at 8 a.m.—No. 1184, John Walker, Bk, from New Orleans—No. 1617, Joh n Airey, B Schoo n e r , from London—No. 910, Pacific, 8.8. from London. Not quite sure of the former flag. Aiarktio. EXCHANGE, JUNE 30. OATS, r 451 b, s d s d lrisli,n. kilndried 3 2 rd 3 4 Do. old do. 3 ft.. 3 5} Do. prline,42lb • 3 5 3 6 Do. do. old 0 0.. 0 0 Foreign, free 0 0.. 0 0 Do. it bond • • • 2 6.. 2 9 PEASE, qr. English, wliste 42 0 . 44 0 Foreign, white 4O 0.. 43 0 BEANS, cty Strip. qr English, new 4l 0 .. 45 0 Do. Pigeon, old 0 0 .. 0 0 Foreign, tree ...• 35 6 .. 37 6 Do. in bond 29 0 .. 31 Irish, Tiek,e. new 37 0 .. 39 0 Do. old - 0 0.. 0 0 'MALT 4Y imp. (11.' English • ..... 59 0.. 62 0 fivosix CORN, ins. qr. Red - ' 0 0 .. 0 0 o O FLoiiit,..4 l 28 0 th • 'En O ish, fine - .. • • 0 0 ..0 0 Ods:new 34 . 0„38 0 Do: fine American. sweet, . • per free brl. 0 0,. 0 0 Do. in bond .... 2P 0 21 0 Do. sour, free: :.. 0 0.. 0 0 Do. in bond .. • • 0 0.. 0 0 Canadian,'free .. 28 0 .. 29 0 Do. in bon.l OATMEAL, 4r 240th _ Enzlisf,'We'w" 0 0 0 Irisk'new Do. old . 0 0 .. 0 0 BRAN, 4P 241 b 1 2.. 1 5 JuLy 1, 1836, LIVEUI'OOL AGRICUL'rt S. d. s. d. Hay • 0 B'o 201 ti New Hay 0 0 0 0 - Clover Hay 0 - 0 0 0 -- Straw, Wheat 0 5 0 6 -- Straw, Oat 0 4 0 5 - Green: Clover 0 2 0. 3 - PRICE OF BULLION IN .LONDON.., • fRII OUNCE. £ s D £ , D Foreign Gold in Bars ,.. 3 17 9 3 -1 .! jV ,‘,.; New Dollars Bari, (Standard; New Doubloons 0 5 0"-- 0/ 5 43 317 6-4.,1 7 9 FOICEIGN MAILS. PLACES. France 1. Malta. (via France,) Italy; Sicily, S a rdi n i a , and Turkey Portugal 'SWeden and Norway ' Gibraltar.' • Malta 4nd the Mediterranean . Madeira, Azores, Canary & Cape de Verde Islds. Rio de Janeiro and Brazil.; Buenos Ayres, Montevideo, Chili, and Peru . Jamaica, St: Domingo, and Havannali: Mexico, Cuba, and Honduras. T,RAL MARKET, JuNE s , d. s. d. „ not Potatoes 2 6e3' 14r wv' Cattle Potatoes ll 1 '7 2 0 ----- Turnips 0 0 0 0 per to Carr o t s Mamzlewurzle 0 0 0 , •-- Manure , 5 0 5 0 Leeward Islands and Detnerara.. . . J Jamaica and Bahamas earthattena and La Guayra North America • Spain Holland and.the Netherlands . Germany, Swit7erland, Denmark, Prussia, Ems- Oa, and the North of Europe WHOLESALE PRICES OF BALTIC AND A: LIVERP X. s. d. £. s. d, TIMBER, r cubic foot, Riga .- 0 2 s(a 0 2 6 Dantzig • Memel . 0 2 11 0 2 5. American Pine -Do. Quebec. Red Pine Quebec Oak Bitch 'L ANK S, 41)* foot of 2 inch. Dani:zig Deck - 0 0 Si 0 0 '4l American,Pine DEALS, VY•stfinclard hundred. Best Petersburg Red D. • - White 14 10 0 17 10 0 Memel, Tied l5 0 5 17. 0 0 Dantzic Sc Swedish Red 14 10 0 15 10 0 PRICES OF SHARIS, Lill ERPOOL, JUNE 30,18:3_6:, rer ..,,.-- 0 Liverpool Coal Gas Liverpool New Gas. and Coke Company, ....£100 New Shares, premium £7O Liverpool and H a rrin g t on 'W a t er W or k s Bootle ditto Exchange Buildings Liverpool and Manchester Railway, ' £loo paid 28.2 0 ,, 0 Ditto Old Quarte rs 25 .... 71 " 0 , - •Ditto - New Quarters Bolton and Leigh ditto • ' 100 .. ...... 2 902 1 1 0 0 ° g Ditto 25 Warri rigton and Newton ditto Kenyon and Lei g h ditt o l OO .... 110 ~ 0 Wigaii Branch ditto Preston and Wi g a n N or th U n i on Li ne ditt o 6O .. • • 78 0 St. Helens an d R unco r n G ap ditto.,loo ~ „ 35 1,. 0 0 Leicester and Swaniiington ditto .. • lO .... 65 u 0 Manch ester, Bolton, and B u ry R a il wa y an d C ana l 48 ~ • • 8 0 0 0 Leeds :and Selby. Rail w ay Grand,Junction ditto 5O ..... 126 0 0 London and Birmingham ditto Birmingham and Gloucester ditt o .... 8 0 0 Manchester and Leeds ditto 5 .... 23 ° 0 North Midland ditto 5 ~,,,. 13 0 Midland ditto 5 •. . • 9 0 0 Edinburgh and Glasgow ditto Edinburgh, Leith and Newhaven . London and Gravesend ditt o Bank of Liverpool Bank of Manchest er l lOl ............. 26 3 1 ,ti ° o g 25 ..• 39 " Manchester . and Liverpool Di s t r i c t B an k l5 .... 29 0 10 n Commercial Bank of Liverpool.... lO .. 22 10 ' Liverpool Marine - Assurance Company 25 .... 016 0 Oldham Gas Light and Waterworks .... 21 10 0 Manchester Fire and Life-Assurance Co lO .... 10 5 6 Ocean Assurance Company • 10 .... 10 0 0 Not them and - Cent ra l B an k o f E ng l an d lO .... 1 5 . 2 6 Union Bank of Liverpool • ' lO ..... 1 6 I" don mercial Bank of England ,5 . 7 2 ... Birk enhead Ferry .O . 0 . vn 0 •• t 0 5 Trad esmens7 Bank • . £2 10.... 3 - , , 1 4 Unitod Trades' Bank `£3 0.... 5 ' A 8 Rova I Rock. Ferry , • . '£s 0.- 9 :" 0 ifetivia Shares £2O 0.... 11 1 1 0 Roynil Harrington Dock. ' £lO. 0...... isqo 0 Boliviu Scrip London and Birmingham Canal £2 0.... ' 3 •RICIIARD a DA,WSO.V. Shari-Broker. LIVERPOOL DISPENSARIES. Number of new patients entered on the books of the Dispensetrieillor ii4 the last week:— Tooßeceived advice and medici n e at.the Institution , Visited at their own ho uses an d supp li e d w i t h - ~J ; medicine, 6 85 392 - 293 VISITORS. - North—Rey. M. Fisher, R ev . R C ro ft , an d M r. S m ith . South—Rev. F. Murphy,' Mr. Jordan, and Mr. T. Robinson. S. 264 208 • North rth. Total at each Dispensary LIVERPOOL INFIRMARY REPORT, From the 23d to the 30th June, 183&. DISCHARGED. In-patients cured Relieved and at own request Made Out-patients Irregular .. 4 Dead . - 0 ADMITTED. In-patients u-patien t ........... .. ........ .. 1 0 : Out-patient s Casuaj.during z I. P.•... • .... the , last week S 0 V. ......... 204 Remain in the ho Ise ...... House Visitors—Mr. Gibbon and Mr. Ri`,•ley'. Consulting Surgeon, Mr. Forshaw. Chaplain, thy; Rev. R. Davies.—House Surgeon, lir. J. Qshcroo' LOOK HOSPITAL. Admitted......... 8 f I n th e H osp i tal.. , ~ . ...36 I Discharged.. ..... t LIVERPOOL TIDE TABLE. Days. Atm. lm E. lit. Festivals ,4c. JurtE.• 11. M. H. M. F. I. Tuesday .....28 10 20 10 44 17 2 King Wm. IV. pro., 183 1 1 Wednesday.. 29 11 10 11 35 18 2 Length of day 16h. 52rn. Thursday ..30 1 18 6 Length of night 7h. Bm. Friday, July 1 —35 —5O 18 4 Mars rises lh. 6m. morn. Saturday.— 2 115 140 17 9 Visit. of B. V. Mary. SUNDAY... 3 2 6 231 16 9 sth Sun. aft. Trim Dok— MVO Monday .... 4 256 320 15 7 Tran. St. Martin. lueer LONDON GAZETTE. -TUESDAY, JUNE 28. WHITEHALL, J;nlg 26, 1836. a The King Nas been pleased to di rec t l e tt ers patent to b e pa-'se under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain as ri Ireland, grantin g th e d i gnity of a Baronet of the said United KinP ,° r t bodies o the following4be gentlemen, and the respecti ve heirs male of th i ei le lawfully gotten, vi z . :—Jolin Power, of Kilfane, in tor county of. Kllkenny; Esq. ; Sir. Francis Workman Macnaghten, be Bushmills House, in th e county of Antrim, and of Mahan, in ' county. of Arinagh, Knt. • John Kennedy, of Johnstown, in ti l e county of Dubli n, Esq. t. Lieutenant-General Sir Williai n .lioustony , G.C.B. ST. JAMES'S-PALACE, Jurin 15, 1836. The Ring w as thi s ci pleased to confer the h onour of Knighthood upon William Symonds; R.N., Surveyor of his MajestY Navy. —J INSOLVENT. June 27 .oseph Bottomley, Beech-street, Barbican, London, f ai " fight-manufacturer. BANKRUPTS. John Wade, Lynn Regis, Norfolk, stationer. Thomas Henry Eve, Bath, milliner. Joseph Mitchell, Brigthelmstone, lodging-housekeeper. William Sturt, Charley, Sussex, wine-merchant. William Phillips Atkins, and Robert Freeman, Houndaditch, 141/° don, bricklayers. ' Thomas Rogers, Cranbourne-street, Leicester-square, Lend, straw bonnet-maker. Edward Quin, Park-lane, Piccadilly, London, coach-maker. _ Richard Williamson, Derby, saddler. George-Combes, Chichester, common brewer. John 'Waddington, Pontefract; common brewer. John Riste, jun., ihnin.ster, lace manufacturer. DIVIDENDS. • July 21, J. 14'Creddie, Lower-grove, Commercial-road, London draper—July 20, J. Chapman, Blackfriars-road, London, dealer . glass—July 20. W. Williams and T. Hill, Bow Church-yard, Londol? factors—July' 19. M. Last and W. Casey', Great Winchester-stre P London, silk-m e r c h an t—J u l y 23 . S. Evans, Castle-street, Leiceste r ' square, L on d on, li cense d v i ctualler—July 20. J. %.11s, Kingston, upon-Hull, merchant—J u ly 22. T. F ox t on, Ki ngston-upon-Hu ll , In 0. chant—July 23 : W. North, Kingston-npou-Hull, merchant—Aug:,io, W. Clark, Kingston,upon-Eull, hop-merchant—July 21. A. Ai, Smedley,. Lancashire. dealer and ch a p man —J u l y 21 . H . B a tters and C. Battershy, Hindley, Lancashire, cotton spinners—J . ll l Y W. Splatt, Stoke-upon-Trent, flint grinder. CERTIFICATES To be granted, unless cause be shown to the contrary on or befall , t" 19th day of July. if; J. Heap, Ma nc h es t er, b u ild er —J . F rante i , Leeds,' irtnkeeper-- (4 . Ward, Ai , arnford-court London, merchant—C. Huckbody, Crolvl9/, Lincolnshire, coal-merchant—S. Gatner, Birmingham, factor —ll ' Brown, High-street, Shnredich, cordwainer. BIRTH. On Monday last, the lady of William Bates, Esq. of Gambier' terrace, of a daughter. MARRIED... J. On Tuesday last, at St. James's Ch urc h; T ov t e th -park, by Of, ti:r turd • ‘tig • smith, NMr. Francis Jeffery, 91 path, to'Caroline, - sett= of the late Rev. W. S. Bradley; vicar of Chard and Timbersco ll2 SomerseL Oft' Same day, at St. Peter's Church, by the Rev. TbomasHalW ll, ,a r s,. John Wilson Rose, to Miss Sarah Caparn, youngest daughter of Caparn, Leicester. Same day, at Walton-on-the-Hill, Mr. John Cheesbroub,.stN oc p np to Frederica Caroline, eldest daughter of William -Pickering. Everton. On Wednesday, last, 'at Ellesmere, by the Rev. Robeit Maddot s: vicar of Leighton, in the county of S a l op, W illiam Knight Thom Esq. of this town, to Emily, second daughter of the late Rev Thor.. °swell, rector of Westbury, in the same county. DIED. On Saturday last, suddenly, John Midgley, Esq. of DeepHsu.. And near Rochdale, aged 46 y ears ; deeply deplored by his relativesc,won greatly, and sincerely r egrette d b y a numerous acquaintance, tololY his sterling worth and ac ti ve k i ndness of disposition had deserve endeared him. Same day, at his house, Great George-square, Mr. Charles GOc i rro' shipbuilder, of this t own, i n the 50th year of hisage, Few • , more generally kno wn, esteemed, or respected. e. OnSunday last, at Halewood, a ge d 21 y ears, M ary. s l aug hter of l John Laidlaw, of Llattlby-streCt. • On Tuesday last, at Parkgate, Mrs. M ar y Ab ra h a m, nearly - years a faithful domestic in Mr. Bushell's faintly. LIVERPOOL: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED EVERY TUESDAY. AND FRIDAY• MORNING' . BY• RICHARD' PATTI%ON, At No. 4, NORTH CRESCENT, CASTLE-STREET. and Orders and Advertisements are • received by Messrs• NevrtO n ...E • webro) , I , Co., Warvvick-squareo ,13araer, Fleet-street; Deacon, jo sep Reynell, Chancerp-lane; Lawson & Barker, Birchin -lane ; , o w- Thomas, I; Finch-lane,- Cornhill; Mundell Hammond, 27,,,Tatjto thud •street ; Mitchell, 8, Red Lion-court, Fleet-street ; „`,,' Gar and Lewis, 4, Crown-court, Threadneedle -street, London ; n a pe, , ) raway's ; at the London, Commercial Coffee- house, 'perin ei lL'house' at the Jerusalem Co ffee r hoysh cornhill.; ; Cbapteire.. e „house' c ater-noster=row ; and" Wirth and South American Cotle,e . and . - areadneedle-street, London; by Messrs. Johnston and ",: x sffice• r. John Lee, at his, Newspaper Apd Advertisepiefit Agen'rheeLer' 4, Irenry-street,' Dublin; Mr: M'Phun, 0 . 14.5g0w; Mr. , Bxchange-street, and Mr. Le*isfMarket-street, Maliches t V466;;;: ' Malley, Bookseller,Warvington ; )Mr. Clarke, Pilot-ofce , .. and Mr. Coupe, 33, Union-street, .13irrningllan. - • t FOST-NIOnN . _ NT orula y, Tuesd , a3 * # Thursday, an d Saturday. ' - Monday , Thursday. Monday before t 1 first Tuesday' in every 'month. T fi T :u ult s ent l e h c e js ls v i:t d e :1 111 : : : 8 : :e y::: 31 b 1:1 ! 3 .nae l e e r ntd° f o l: :::: o r rteal at b e ef l , nt: t hat :: Monday lin 4 Thursday, IERICAN TIM BO ,oL, JUNE 30 183 0 . DUTIHS loai. of 50 feet. load of 50 ft• s s. 4 fold of 50 feet. Pi *l2O. £2 ss. a i c2 l o s . £l9 0 £22 r 120. d