The Sun. — London, England, 1806-07-18 00:00:00

might 'lave 'bee pietoll.y.tile beginning'OT my if materials had been I . o.gulatly furnished. Mr. Seryeant SHEP HERD, in oPezing, the, case 'on the part of Mr. MaWMart, in a very elogilent ,tress to the - Intt,.obsetfVed, that.his Lei rne4,l3rother (Serjeant.Vaughan), in addressing them, had talked of his -Client; and the difficulty of making - out - an account of all the business done for hiM by the _ Plaintiff for the ldst few yeAs - •; but he begged to a,sure the Court and Jury, that Mr. Mawniaa never `Meant to avail- himself of such a circumstan'ce, for h.id they called for= his books, they could have seen evety itein and particular entry which constituted the accounts between these parties. The cplestion was, ,whether a-printer; when paper was . sent to him, in case such paper and the printing thereon be lost frot any misfortune, by fire, or otherwise, 'be re- • tiPonsible for the 'same'? In ,this case the complaint was, that copy wits not- sent sufficient to keep - all tie compositorA enniloyed, and great negled Was charged against Mr. Mawman,- by the Plaintiff, on this account ; and for this, it was contended; that Mr. Mawman was liable to the:loss. Lord Chief 'Justice MANSFIELD here interposed, and asked, was not this point already decided ? In the case of a tailor, could he charge for making a . suit of clothes before they were sent home ? &c. Mr. Serjeant VAUGH AN, in reply to the queStion, adverted to the case of a ship being burnt in- dock, when the builder was not-,held Mr.. SeTjeant SHEPHERD then continued. In , al lusion to 'his fast position, he said, that the tree must lie where 'rt fell; that is, that the charge should be made where it may be substantiated. 4. charge of . negligence , liad been brought forward against Mr. Mawmarr, for not. supplying a thing within a rea sonable time ; when it would . appear evident that no time was lost on his part, and he had, in fad,. no thing to say to that matter ; this was a question. of great rand serious importance: to Mr. Gillet, but of little moment tp Mr. Mawman, except, so far as paying a large sum of. money. What was called a whimsical-set-off, consisted of several items of money bad and received, property in h;tnelS, and that Mr. G. was the insurer. et that properly ; and the question Was . , whether printers did not frequently elle& policies of insurance upon goods in trust . ? As instances . of this, he would mention the two Messrs. Woodfidl, and seVeral others, who always considered themselves responsible to the booksellers ; and, in particular' instances, did pay for property so destroyed. The work in question was a Novel, introducing. the His tory of Greece, put into the mouth of the younger Anacharsis, who is supposed to converse with all the Philosophers of those days., . and gjyes an ac count of all the laws; politics, usages,, and customs of the Antients, and had been written, by the celebrated Abbe Barthelemi. This work was trans lated by the Editor in question (Mr. Beaumont) ; and because he could not spin . his brain quite. so fast as a spider does his web, and supply the 'craving compositors with copy as fast as they could wish, Mr. Mawman Was to be charged with ne— gligence. It was well ascertained that the prin ter never brought the work in hand, into the. year's account, until finished ; , and Mr. Gillet wishing toinclude this Work in such account, was anxious to have it finished, and not to - obligo Mr. Mawman, as stated on the . other side ; for this reason; and this alone,. the Editor was haunted by the printers, and it Was an absolute fraud on Mr., Mawman to charge hith with this. It had .been said, that -this was,, not a new work, and the copy-:. Tight being nearly expired, when any one might publish it, Mr. - Nlawatan was, therefore, anxious to have it executed : but it, might as well be so s tkl of Bishop Newton's edition of Milton's Works, with his - elaborate notes upon it. Any person might have published the original work, but it could_ not be contended that the Bishop's work was not new and exclusive property ; so it might be Aaidthat this edition of Anacharsis, revised, altered, and with . an notations,by Mr. Beaument, was not a: new work ; but if Mr: Mawman was so anxious to, publish this, he mighthave employed other printers, as is usual in such cases: But Mr. Mawman did not rest .his case upon any of these grounds—his was a defence quite foreign from them. Having heard. of the fire, he was surprised that Mr. Gillet did, not see him upon the subje&; and never having come to him, he prevailed on a friend to speak to him about it.— After some apologies, Mr. Gillet said, that Mr.Maw man need not be uneasy, as he should have. the po licy on goods and stock in trust. At that time the policy had - not been signed, but the usual deposit was made at the Imperial Insurance Mice. After that time Mr. Gillet made - an application to the Fire Office, and not having effeaed his policy, but only .given in his particulars, they at first denied that he . hactany . claim, but afterwards engaged to give him 50001. Hearing this, .Mr. Mawman (when the Office was about to pay that sum) , attached it in the_ I.layor's Court ; and Mr. Gillet. afterwards meeting 2 friend of Mr. Mawman's, declared that Mr. Day, the Secretary to the Office,_ .who had been, his Tgreatestenemy, was now his, best friend, as he ad vised him to claim only, for his ,private property, and not for that in trust,. as. thereby he. defeated Mr. Mawman's attachment, and he_ did not care for it, . 'accompanying' the expresSion with, 'snapping his fingers: From this it-wasevident he Lad received 50001. to his, own . priVate use, instead L pf,applying a . portion of it to' goddt in. trust.. He therefore con tended lie had a right to charge Mr. Gillet with ,this sum, as so much money had to the Defendant's use - -and on these grounds he was entitled to the set-off which had b'ren made against the .Plaintiff's. clO7 • wand. • John PattersOn, foreman to the Defendant, depos ed, , that he remembered Mr. Gillet ) who was print ing The Voyages of Anacharsis the Younger, calling at Mr. MaWman's shop in the month of Nov, last. He came into the counting-house, and requested him to write to Mr. Beaumont for more copy, that the work might be printed before Christmas, for the pur pose of including it in that year's account. Mr. Beau mont, while they were in conversation, .came into the shop, and he and Mr. Gillet conversed together tor some time ; when it was at length agreed bet Ween them, that the Plaintiff should Send all the 'sheets to . Mr. Beaumont, that he might make out the Index. Mr. Beaumont, be believed, then went out.; and as Mr% Gillet was leaving the shop, in a short. tittle after, Jae said if the work remained a month in his' ware , house after it .was printed, it, would be at _Mr. LONTV N : Printed by R I CHAR!) HARRIS, of No. 4, Martivt-coi,!tt, Bow-street ; and At the SUN.OEVICi, NQ. i 12, .Strand where AdVarillf27l267llS Orders f Published b) WILLIAM Aamicaß SCRuurs, of South Molton- tree, Grosvenor.Auao u* the Pape e Letters fox, the .Erlitcir, &c. {cost-puid) ; must be acldressesi. but it was by no means Mr..1 4 ,4404's wida to. de- Vp the work, nor woithi - lt b6-hissirrterest to do su.. The Defendant r havinglrefrZlost4 his case, §.er-- jeant VAnaltAN; for the. Plaintiff,: Stared,- that it would be necessary for him - total other .W.it nesses:s. and having obtainedileavefrom the Court; Mr. Day, the Secretary to the Imperial InSur- , ance-.Office; was eseniiined.' H•edejilaSed; that• Mrs secures . Gillet iiill iw madefAielaiiri for Wool.. •After.the I s On -cross-examination by Serjeaut V,sudsLisi, on' I fire, :he fonnd that .aitentry s had ,tteen-anade-tin the the part of the Plaintiff - , the ;Witness acknowledged books of the proposed ,insuranc e, and that a deposit that he did not know the subject Mr: Mawrnan :Ina , of '5l, had been_ lodged. He,did not think Mr. Gil- Mr. Gillet were ,conversing On WhO the last men- let ever made a claim for gaads'in - -trust. - . tioued words were used. Mr. Gillet, he said, .had The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE•aSked what the objet frequently pressed him .for copy; 'Previous to No- of this evidence. was ? - . vember, and before 3he said he wished to in'clude' I Mrs Si'ejeant A.riStSdittos - Said, to contradid ,the Anachersis in that year's• account. He knew Mrs 1 evidence on the part of the Defendant. ••• Gillet had printed Laing History of Scotlsold for The LORD CHIEF. JubTictialth there could he no Mr. Mawiflan some time before - , .but he did not. contradiCtion, .as Mr. Bonsor bad not said that the know. that Mr. Mawmail had buri)Osely .kept it - 1 Defendant had put in a written. clams. ".. • - ' : • : . back, to prevent Mr. Gillet froM 'charging it in that 'Mr. Day, in continuation, said , that he had told year's bill; he, however, believed he 7heard the 1 Mr. Gillet, his deposit was.So Small; the claim could. - Plaintiffcomplain, thatAnacharSis waskept back for I not be allowed; and the reasoniMr..Gillet gave,fox a similar purpose. In the conversation' he had be- not specifying the sum he meant to insure for was; fore spoken of between Mr. Beaumont and the Plain- . • that be was about to purchase other premise's and tiff, he reisolleCted that the : latter of to procure_ new furniture ; , his deposit :therefore was taken fora i l a person for Mr. Beaumont, 'free of expellee, wile) few days. Five thousand pounda s Aad been paid by ! Was accustomed, to make upindexes,.and who might i the Company to m r . Gillet, not as a matter of right, assist him in getting it - on quick. There were, a but in consequence of - his great losses; they referred , great .maay notes, by Mr. Beaumont, to the iv(*irk ; the, 'matter to three:Merchants, two of whom were:' :but he could not tell how many pages they would nominated by Mr. Gillet, and - they agreed on the' .: -occupy, whether they would - Occupy six or not, - or" , sum of 'i.)001. whiCh was paid. ' - - • , -:. whether 41. 19.5. (4 Vra• the only charge made for . The pr i n t ed paper, containing - the resolutions of them. Mr.-Beatamont, he was a\vare - , was furnish- the boeksellerS, which :insisted on the liability of ed with the proof sheets, and also With an entire printers for goodS committed to their care ; iind - silSo : copy 5 - and he understood the, work now stoo:1 still a resolution of the printei - S, refusing to become - re: , - for want of a title. The NStktnesS did not know that sponsible, • were then put in and read, being first Mr. Gillet told Mr. MaWman lie would not lie re- . • pri)ved,to have been delivered at of the sponsible for woks in his bands. . s - Defendant: • ' l ' '-• ' --:' '-. .- ' • .. Mr. stockdale deposed, that he was 34 years in, Serjeant VssuanAN then called upon the Defend- M and `hat he had known many instances of ant to produce a printed paper served on him by or- , - fire, where the Printer was not • called on; and he, der of the Printers, being a resolution entered into for his part, always insured his works, without let by them, in answer to some resolutions of the Book- ' sellers. The . Defendant's Counsel having stated that tiny the Printers know: He allowed it was generally no such paper could be found, Serjeant Nr%IIIIIAINT.' said by Printers, tint they insured so as:to cover the of ,property in their possession ; but, Whenever any of produced a printed paper, purporting to be a copy their houses happened to be burned, the contrary ap- it ; but the Witness declared he bad no positive - . knowledge that stadia paper bad been served, though geared to be the fad. • Before Hamilton's . fire, he he had a faint recolleaion of haying beard that one trusted to the wordS of the Printers, but, since that time he has constantly insured; 'and he was con to that effect Was left at Mr. Mawman's house. He vinced that ever)? Bookseller would, for the future, admitted he had heard from the Defendant, that re- solutions and counter-resolution's of the Printers and ' • follow. his example; Mr. Beesley deposed much to the same effect , and Booksellers had been circulated ; but he totally de - Bible, and Bow : Hied - having easer heard. him admit fiat the Printers' mentioned two workSs Macklin Hied 's yer's History of . England) which had - been insured would not consent to be answerable for the property by the Proprietors. '. ' • _ committed to their charge. ' . Serjeant VAUGIIAN" was about - to call other - wit-- On re-examination_ by Serjeant SHEPHERD, l'se ' nesses to the same point, but the LORD CHIEF Ju's said, Mr. MaWman never- had desired the work to ricE said, in his opinion, it was unnecessary'. 'be kept back: The. work .is a translation from the 'Theesidence was then closed ; and Serje-ant-SnEr . French, and he understood that, exclusive of the man, in a short sp-eech; observed on the evidence: notes,. there Were many alterations made by Mr.. He said it could not be a matter of wonder that'the Beaumont in the original translation, some of which Defendant,: who was only six years in businesS,, i be had himself seen. • should not be up to the tricks of the Printers, when .1 Richard Newby, an apprentice to Mr. Mawbassa„ Mr. Stockdale, who had been thirty-tour years -As remembered Mr. Gillet being at his master's house, Novena- Bookseller, had trusted to them till withinctbese shortly before the fire, which happened in . few years. He desired the Jury to recoiled,. that ber. He heard part of a conversation between him though it might be prudent for a man. , to. insure, leis: the last witness. Mr. Gillet said he wished , own goods, yet it did not by any means follow, that. the work to be completed that year, for the purpose charging it in the account of the year 1805. ; and of 1 because he trusted to the promise of his Printer, he . should, therefore, be at such a considerable loss ; . and as he I. r. Gillet) was going out, the Witness heard i not only that, but be compelled to pay for untinish him say that the property must be at Mr. Mawman's I ed and undelivered work. The :Learned .Serjeant: risk after it had 'been at his warehouse one 'or two 1 then, after adverting to many other points, con months; but the Witness did not know from what , eluded by expressing his conviction of obtaining a time. - Joseph Bonsai-, a Stationer, living in Salisbury- verdid.• , .• :. s: . . , Pi: square, knew the Plaintiff and Defendant, and' re- , ' Mr. Serjeant VmssmAss -then addressed the. Joey: in reply: He spoke at considerable length,• ;and membered the fire perfectly well.; shortly after it , adverted to the different points in. the.:evidei= happened, he sawlr. Mr. Mawman ; and in the course which he conceived made in favour of hi. •-• .fetch Of the same dayhe met Mr. Gillet in Salisbury- He pressed' upon the - Jury the • great' hardship it square. He told bins, that Mr. Mawman had been would be on Mr. 'Gillet .if he was obliged to hand to see him, that he might know the state 'of his over the property since the fire, adding, that .Mr. Mawman, . money . he had received for the loss of his was very much hurt, as be understood the goods , aWn prop a6terty ; and desired them to recolleel, ion the Defendant succeeded, .t'that were not insured according to promise. Mr. Gillet, iif in this here in answer, said, that when he .made that promise, i would be Ations brought against Mr. Gillet, to three he had several works of Mr. Masionaii's in his hands, , • times the amount. of the- money .he - received; by Which were - a long time since sent borne, and he 'other Booksellers. He concluded by saying , tha t as the Plaintiff had takewas much care of the Defend therefore did not think Mr. Mawnian had any claim on him; In another conversation he hid with Mr: , ant's property as he had of his own, he could not be held liable' Gillet; that gentleman told him, that he thOught • ' Lord Chief Justice MA?4SFIELD thought, that af- Mr. Day (the Secretary to the Imperial Insurance ter hearing the evidence of : Mr. Stockdale, and Company) - had been his: enemy,s in consequence of others,-- upon. the subjed'ef the custom of the trade, sew ill language. he bad received, from him • the there was little question upon the matter. Mit the morning after the fire, at the House of Mr. Phillips, real case was, if a Bookseller send paper to . a Printer, a Bookseller in Bridge-street; but he,now proved to which should happen to be burnt, whether. that Prin be his best frier d. as lie advised him to alter his ter was bound.to pay for it or not .It 'being his duty claim, and leave out goods in trtist,",whieh'would d 6 to take care of the paper, while in his custody,' if away Mr: , Mawman's attachments _ Mr. Gillet then took out of his -pocket-book, - and apparently read any misfortune happen to it, be is bound to- make it good, however hard it may be -upon the ins /Yew it the claim he was to deliver in to the Insur ance Companye. ansl, snapping his fingers, again dividual, Several Witnesses had. proved the fre • said, " that as he had no policy, by ounttinglgaodS 'quent applications for copy , in , order to throw the in trust in his claim, h a do away mr. - 1, /aw . blame on :•Mr. Mawnsans, but M Mr. awman could . . . • only send the copy as he . received. it from the Editor; mati's attattachment." . and if Mr. Beaumont. was to be.believeds his evi - On cross-examination by Mr. MARRYATT, the -. derce completely exculpated Mr.lMa wm a n ; and Witness said, he undersood from Mi. Gillet that he the delay' only proCeeded from the nature the had claimed 60001. but on the suggestion of Mr. . work; and if Mr. - Gillet was' not .aware of this, he Day, had altered it to 50°01. , Being reexamined, should have inquired and - ascertained it before he, the Witness said, be did not understand from Mr. in a. written engaged in the undertaking i but this must h aV e Gillet that he-had, at that time, given - been a subject in-which lie must have been perfeetly claiin, only that.he had made 2 claim. conversant. 'This broUght it to the qbestion, wise ' Owen Rees was called to prove a conversation he ther the Printer is responsible for the property which had had with Mr. Gillet immediately after Mr. comes into his `possession I arid if nor, - ,the. Book- Hamilton's fire ; brit 'it appearing he was a joint seller must run a great risk-. Mr. Sfockdale has proprietor of the paper . burned, an objeCtion was said, he was 34:years in'business, and never thought taken,- and he was not examined. . of insuring his papei himself, until 'Hamilton's fire, After some conversation between . the Counsel he then declared he would no longer trust kthe pro on both sides,'it was allowed that the quantity of • mise of the Printers, and from • this the custom of paper delivered-was the same as that charged in the the trade• Was evident, and . the Printers held them_; set-off. . ' ' selves. responsible; and except in the cases "of Boyj . . William Beaumont deposed., that he translated 1 dell's,Shakspeare, and Rowyer's History of Eng - i the first edition of Anacharsi.s, abOut 14 years since, l land, two works of great magnitude and - expence; and that about which he Was •now emplovedl - there was no instance to the contrary ; and the re-1 was a new French edition, revised and corrected by - solutions, of the Booksellers and Printers - left the; the. Abbe Barthelemi himself. In the month of case just as it Was at first. Upon the whole,l 0 February, 18, he began 'the work, which' never , therefore, lie wished the. Jury- first to consider) was kept back by the direction of Mr. Mawman. whether Gillet did Make a promise to insure the; The reason why there was a scarcity of copy to- paper ? and - if he adOally • made the insurance` wards the end was, because the latter part, Consisting upon trust property, and had received the money:: of the Abb6 Barthelemi's Life, was all manuscript •as for such trust property ? If he , did do, so, he copy, and it was impossihle he could write as fast put a Veey ' great cheat ,upon Mr. ;Mawmam--- as eight or ten men could compose. • He had also :. Something of this nature must have occurred when; the misfortune to lose his wife, and that wLs ago Mr. Mr. Mawman,attached• the money in the Lope.; ther reason Why he was not able to get on so quick ; I rial. Fire Office, which it wa4 natural : for him -s. Taw mhn'n, riert , . ,Vick 'fi re , a CMr . i 4 illl . kit 011 4 A, 3 ' l ie. which' h 0 -1 -inter,appeneo the yeai - 1 603, he i -4 c:- i lernht_itd perfe,atly well a long time previous to that : I\.;:ty....Mawman hack, succeeded to Is t fi; 'Dilly's business'i and '.;trle Witness remembered dne, day hearingl :Mr., giblet, in' a converSatiOn - with - Alr. Mawman, say:that he might,, on . that score, rest contented, as all his property in his ha ads was • , • . 0 do , rrorn iew,--, 4 r,;. 1 Li ~i-t with Bonsor :; anj , ,i - :[iieStk h 7 Jury th glf, h~ cana:!. tc).strearA4 .1 dulibcrato. - alsehood, then the priouise,...in_ a subsequent coil erfbo#,; I,ypf cotifirmo; for, if be bad not made t, tie ~ , 7 0tilas t ile6 liav PITA e it ; ;Ind if they tlibtOlt tVlii'llet carable;Of telfittg such n lie toMr. Day,' i as-he s4teci,Ltiien the questions they bad N cgrisider -_ ivere,l.E4Etbsr, according., to the wage of . the trade, . he wasresponsible - fOi - tbe - piper . ? ar4 next,: whe- tiler 'fiel - 'lll4' dal : illy prOMised to make - such in i suran.oo - . t. , , , 1 :, ._ -, -, . .s.A - • - The Jury retired fir about twenty minutes, and :hen returned a verdiel of 1,8181. for the Plaintift From some observations which 'fell frdrn 11'6 learned Judge, aild some . fi&s‘ s w . bleb tame out on the-trial, the Defendant, with the approbation of kis-T Counsel, declared his intention of moving, in Term, 'foK.a new tki* 7 ‘ • .* • .4t the. Quarter, Sessions for Lancaster, yesterday se'imight,James fio . %Vard",''a - youtli*Of 18,'igds - con. vieted "Of= assaillting a little boy; only eight'years old; 8 0 41;•01 ,1 r.. .Lawrence, bair-dresser, of thaLOwn, fined five pounds, and imprisoned till it is paid.. He had enticed the boy, with 'his yotingertrother,liita a quarry on the Aloor;mmter the.pretence of shew ing them a birch neg.; taut getting _them into , the quarry-mess' hut, he, made them pull down their breeches, and beat theta botli severely with - so that not sit dONVI; life fhreatetred them for crying, and placed a Urge flag at the mouth of the•hut, which they Cokild-ao(move; and afters-' relitaininglhere aFonsidcrable time, thCy got mil by rein oving a :smaller Stone .frOM file top:,—The. iden tity of the prisoner was also proved' by 'the evidence - - of" another boy, who had been served in a slain: - manner several times before. EXTRAORDIi.TARY CIRCUMSTANCE.—EIirbt weeks ago; a terrier dog, in pursuit, it is supposed, of a • hare, was seen to tall into the shaft ofan unwrought coal-pit, in' Elswick-fields, near Newcastle. Its . howling was freguently beard, - and many persons threw stones down, with the-view of putting it out, of- its misery, but without effeA. On Wednesday last a-mason of Newcastle; prompted by humanity,- sent down his boy, wfio-brOught up the poor sufferer, a mere skeleton ;: but-by care-it is recovering. When • first broeght up it conld not ,eat,' but lapped Water, which, during. the whole of the dismal period of its . confinement (except the hare- which probably fell in . with it), must have been its only s Sustenance. -.Last week as Thomas Hornsby, a st?.rclier in the sail-cloth manufaaory of Robert Campio,i, Esq. at Whitby, waS coming -down from the-b'terching loft, by the breaking of .the rope by which he bed; -the insufficiency Fri which had nOt been suspected, was - precipitated to the , tottom of the stairs witi* great violence; .and his skull being2frasaured by his head:having struck 'against. the end .of a beam,. he died the following.daN,. leaving 4, wife, and -a family of small children to That * `,`...Knowlechre- -of a disease . . is. half its• an adagf. r.ev - A.tr was more fu,ly, veriii*Zthtin in tlig DiSczise, which, Pro -=., teus like, ~i15511.63,,p- g kp ' XIIY -difi,erent forms,. that it re4uireiri:n;s - nialinerefoti of ti..\-perlence and-know ledge to distipguistl s so .of from tithe- 'comp and to 2.:ply- witb 'etEcacy such. rgineals as will i iroduce; a radial cut - 4, ‘vithcAtt underiniiling the constitten: The ginc . s; _Or ,50lonion's..Prpf , 4•,.is the : long for re medy,for. all itscstigt, when Alercui-y or Atitimany - , , Nn.. • ot.Ver • i of .• 1,. to proye rove- of higibest atility in all' casCE cf `. d..-!prave3 lia!bit, with . • affedioos of .the slliIi; hence its eta-ficy in cases, 'of .Scurvy, Scrofula,- cr likasy, as well.as in the. coVirmed fates ; and hence oy Its sanative power it , expels *vikus saitly;t9pl,,aa4..rpst6res it to -.convalesceilce when,impalLact-T)fy,•alseaSe, or the deletcrious : prep4rationsif IN/Picifry, Antirnohy,•anil Aquafintis. This sovereign, remedy now, he had of all reputa,ble Venders -of Genulue Medi-, tines througho4 „the Vnitei.l, l l . ; rn ingdo,, in half* guinea and :33. faMily bottles,containiiig ,four lesser SHIY JVL Jf S. ORAr?St,INID, JULY r 6. Pa&sectby.L-the Ilohtqtn, from Gr6,:inllnd ; Two, Brothers, Holston, and fyichor's 1-1o!,e, rat ii, twin Mir.. woy ; Ngerittria, .Sch . p.y,-.: from Cadiz ;. Betsey,•S`coit, :Ooni Quebc ; Fnme, cw.ye!l, - from. VirgUlia; Albiop, Go ninon., and 'Mary, .Martini . ftom Sailed—the , -N S De Bon , I rmaas, -BvStas,...fotiSt. Owl's; .Remittance, Law, for New_y u rk. ; . t ent1 y; 0 1 4 , 4)4 : 4 , for Elsinore; Eneyheid, i i. alkes, out' Goode . lju,Ope, .Ly kett, for Vareil. On Tuesday, at .Bisboti's. Court, E xetcr, the 1-ien. Mrs. .Charles Paget, or a. Sen. - Yesterthy,.Mrs. (rant, or West-Equare, °Li Son. • 11.111 R I !ED.; Yesterday, at St. •Jra - les's, Cleikenwell, William Mur rell,. Esq. of Coldbatiwtields, to Miss Elizabetto..Godson, daughter of Thomas c:Acispn, Esq. ,of Flochley. cVedili;ilay, at S',f, I Chutcfr.. Benjainin Brouti - head, ESE). of Lincoln, to MistiHitiir,"of . : On the. tistb. inst. 4.:Southampton, John Baillie, Esq-.of - Sherwood Park, County of - Carlow, to Miss Ann Wilson, youpgest daughter of the late Richard Wilson, Esq. of the Island of St. Yesterday, at Hendon Lieutenant-Colonel P. Carey, of the - 2/lt! , 'Regiment, to Miss Hewett,' eldest daughteroftieutenar-Generaljlei ' velt. Yesterday, at 55. Mary-le 7 lpone. Church, the. Hon.' w.. a. Hare, bOrl of Curd Ennismore, to !hiss Baugh, .the only 'daUghter Pirsaao n 0,11; Esq. of Upper Wimpole-street. • ft-he Same daY, l4 st St. Matthew's, Bethnal .gieen,,Mr. Ed ward William Rowell, of Bow, to Miss Watts, of theformer place. ~. _, __. Y}flW. On the t3th inst. at hl4 hotise in Queen Ann-sheet West, Major;Generai.laynesJ.Pannatyne, 9t The Bombay 14stablisii meat., Yesterday mrirning, &gin; the time the Committee were sitting at•Haber.lasbeas' Hall, losepli.,Slmmer, tone of the Gentlemen on'tlyi. COMmittee... Compl3irled of being suddenly taken dl, a Surgeon - ivasirriniediately-selit ter, who attempted to relieve hinix,:but without et4CI, and he died al. Most instantaneously. „ , XESTEI Haak Stock, 2rt • Navy 5 per Cent, 94 5 per cent. 1797, Irish 5 per . Cent. 4 per t ent: 3 per Cent. Kett J6z Fa, 3 per ;:t. Con. bz 6z•6iii !tank 1,. Ann. 17i:13-rows • ,1 Ditto Short Ann. STOCKS MIDAY. India Stock, 186 I 3 ell. ailf. India BtAnciS, IS. 2s. tils. South Sea Stock, New Aim • ' .Excheq.tiilts, ts. pr. rs. dif. Omnium, 6 Imperial 3 v : :: Cent. tons. for 240 i I ukY, 63 ~ -',-~ ~