The Sun. — London, England, 1847-08-11 00:00:00

THE NEW PARLIAMENT. The following is a List of the Returns received up to the time of our paper going to press:— Lib. Peel. Prot Ahdy,T.N.—Lyme Regis 1 0 0 Acland, Sir T.—Devon (North) .• • ... 0 1 0 Acton, Colonel—Wicklow (county) „. 0 0 0 Adair, H.E.—lpswich 1 0 0 Adair, A.S.—Cambridge (borough) • ... 1 0 0 Aglionby, H. A.—Cockermouth 0 Alford, Lord—Bedfordshire ••• •• • 0 1 Anson, Colonel—Staffordshire (South) ... 1 0 g Anson, Lord—Lichfield •.. 1 Arbuthnot, Hon. H.—Kincardineshire 0 0 0 1 0 1 Arkwright, G.—Leominster ..• • 0 0 Armstrong, Sir N.—King's County _ •••• 1 1 0 0 Arundel and Surrey, Earl of—Arundel .• 0 1 0 Ashley, Lord—Bath ••• •** 0 1 0 Attwood, J.—Harwich ••• ". 1 0 0 Bagshawe, J.—Harwich ••• "• • 0 0 I Bailey, J.—Breconshire ••• 2 0 1 'Bailey, J., jun.—ll er ef , rdshare ... BadMe, H. J.—lnvernesssh ire •.. e .• ••• ••• 1 0 0 Baines, M. T.-11.u11 Baldock, E. H. —Shrewsbury •• 0 1 0 Baldwin, C.B.—Totness .• • ... 1 0 0 Banker, G.—Dorsetshire 0 0 1 Barclay, David--Sunderland • 1 0 0 Baring, F. T.—Portsmouth ••• ... 1 0 0 B ar ing, H. B.—Marlborough 0 1 0 ng, T.—Huntingdon 0 1 0 Baring, Hon. W. B.—Thetford ... 0 1 0 Barkly, IL—Leominster 1 0 0 Barnard, E. J.—Greenwich . . 1 0 0 - Barrington Viscount—Berkshire 0 0 1 Beckett, W.—Leeds Bell, J.—Thirsk • 1 0 0 Bell, M.—Northumberland (South) ... 0 0 1 Benbow, J.—Dudley ••• ••• 1•• 0 1 0 Benett, J.—Wiltshire (South) ... 0 0 1 Bennet, P.—Suffolk (West) ... 0 0 1 Bentinck, Lord George—King's Lynn ... 0 0 1 Bentinck, Lord 11.---7>.;ottingham (North) 0 0 1 Beresford, Major—Essex (North) ... 0 0 1 Berkeley, Hon. Grantley—Gloucestershire (West) ... ••• ••• Berkeley, Maurice—Gloucester (city) Berkeley. Hon. T. 11. F.—Bristol Bernal, R.—Rochester ..• Bernard, Viscount—Bandon ... Birch, Sir T.—Liverpool Blackstone, W. S.—Wallingford ... Blake, X. J.—Gaiway (borough) Blakemore, R.—Wells ..• Blandford, Marquis of—Woodstock Blewitt, R. J.—Monmouth .•• Boldero, H. G.—Chippenham Bolling, W.—Bolton... ... Bouverie, Hon. E. P.—Kilmarnock Bowles, Admiral.—Launceston Bowring, Dr.—Bolton Boyd, Dr.—Coleraine .Boyle, Major—Frome ..• Bramston, J. W.—Essex (South), Brand, T.—Hertfordshire Bremridge R.—Barnstaple Bright, John—Manchester „. Briscoe, M.—Hastings ... Broadwood, H.—Bridgewater Broadlev, H.—Yorkshire (East) Brocklehurst, J.—Macclesfield ... Brookman, E. D.—Hythe ••• Brotherton, J.—Salford ... ••• Brown, H. =Tewkesbury ... -- Brown, W.—Lancashire (South) ... 1 Bruce, Lord E,—Marlborough 0 Bruges, W. H. L.—Devizes Buck, L. W.—Devon (North) ' 0 Bulkeley, Sir R. B.—Anglesey (county) ... 1 Buller, C. Liskeard Buller, Sir J. Y.—Devon (South) ... • 0 Bunbury, E.H.—Bury St. Edmund's 1 Burghley, Lord—Lincolnshire (South) 0 Burrell, Sir C.—Shoreham• Burroughes, H. M. Norfolk (East) 0 Busfeild, G. W.—Bradford 1 Buxton, E. N.—Essex (South) ... 0 Byng, Right Hon. G. S.—Chatham ... 1 Cabbell, B. B.—Boston 0 Callaghan, D.—Cork (city) Campbell, Hon. W. T.—Cimbridge (boro') 1 Cardwell, E.—Liverpool 0 Carew, W. 11. P.—Cornwall (East) ... 0 Carter, B.—Winchester 1 Castlereagh, Lord—Down County.- ... 0 Cavendish, C.—Buckinghamshire 1 Cavendish, Hn. G. B.—Derbyshire (North) 1 Cavendish, W. C.—Peterborough ... 1 Cayley, E. S.—Yorkshire(North) ... 1 Chandos, Marquis of—Buckingham boro' 0 Chaplin, W. J.—Salisbury Charteris, —.—Haddingtonshire . 0 Chichester, Lord J.—Belfast 1 Childers, J. W.—Halton 1 Cholmondely, Hon. IL—Montgomery (bo roughs)* .• ••• •.. ••• 0 Cholmondely, Sir M.—Lincolnshire (North) 1 Christie, W. D.—Weymouth 1 Christopher, R. A.—Lincolnshire (North)... 0 Christy, S.—Newcastle-under-Lyrae ... 0 Clay, Sir W.—Tower Hamlets ... 1 Clay, J.—Hall Clerk, Sir G.—Dover •.. 0 Clifford, H. M.—Hereford ... ••• ••• 1 Clive, H. B.—Ludlow 0 Clive, Hon. R.—Shropshire (South) ... 0 Clive, Viscount—Shropshire (North) ... 0 Cobbold, J. C.—lpawich ••• 0 Cobden, R.—Stockport 1 Cobden, H.—Yorkshire (West) 1 Cochrane, B.—Bridport 1 Cockburn, A. J. E.—Southampton Cocks, T. S.—Reigate 0 Codrington, Sir W.—Gloucestershire (East) 0 Cole, Hon. Henry—Enniskillen 0 Colebrooke, Sir T.—Taunton 1 Coles, J. H.—Andover 0 Collins, W.—Warwick 1 Colville, C. R.—Derbyshire (South) ... 0 Compton, H. C.—Hants (South) ... Conyngham, Lord A.—Canterbury ... 1 Coope, E.—Yarmouth 0 Copeland, W. T.—Stoke-on-Trent... ... 0 Cotton, Hon. W. IL S.—Carrickfergus ... 0 Courtenay, Lord—Devon (South) ... 0 Cowan, C.—Edinburgh Cowper, Hon. W.—Hertford . 1 Craig, W. G.—Edinbur g h *:. 1 Crawford, S.—Rochdale 1 Cripps, W.—Cirencester 0 Cubitt, W.--Andover ••• ••• ••• 0 Currie, H.—Guildford ... ... 0 Currie, R.—Northampton 1 Curteis, H. B.—Rye ••• 1 Dalrymple, J.—Wigtonshire 0 Darner, Colonel D.—Dorchester 0 Dashwood, G. H.—Wycombe 1 Davie, Sir J.—Haddington (borough) .. 1 Davies, D. A. S.—Carmarthenshire ... 0 Deedes, W—Keut (East) ... •.. ... 0 Dering, J. P.—Aylesbury .. ••• ••• 0 Denison, J. E.—Malton ..• 1 Devereux, J. T.—Wexford 0 D'Eyncourt, Right Hon. C. T.—Lambeth... 1 Disraeli, B.—Buckinghamshire 0 Divett, E.—Exeter ... Dixon, J.—Carlisle ... Dodd, G.—Maidstone Douglass, Sir C.—Warwick... Douro, Marquis of—Norwich Drax, J. S. W. S. E.—Wareham .. Drumlanrig, Lord—Dumfriesshire Drummond, H. H.—Perthshire ... Duckworth, Sir J.—Exeter... ... Duff, G. S.—Elgin (district) Duff, J.—Banffshire ..• ..• Duke, Sir J.—Boston ••• ••• Duncan, G.—Dundee ..• -• Duncan, Lord—Bath Duncombe, Hon. A.—East Retford Buncombe, O.—Yorkshire (North) uncombe, T. S.—Finsbury Dancuft. J.—Oldham ••• Dundas, Admiral—Greenwich Dandas, —.—Linlithgowshire Dunn, Colonel—Portarlingt on ••• Du Pre, C. G.—Buckinghamshire East, Sir J. B.—Winchester Ebrington, Lord—Plymouth Edwards, H.—Halifax 0 Egerton, Sir P. de M. G.—Cheshire (South) 0 Egerton, W. T.—Cheshire (North) ~, 0 Ellice, Right Hon. E.—Coventry Ellice, E.—St. Andrew's (dist.) ~, 1 Elliott, Hon. E.—Roxburghshire 1 Emlyn, Viscount—Pembrokeshire 0 Euston, Earl of—Thetford . . 1 Evans, Sir De Lacy—Westminster ... 1 Evans, —.—Haverfordwest 1 Evans, W. B.—Derbyshire (North) ... 1 Ewart, W.—Dumfries ..• ••• ••• 1 Farnham, E. B.—Leicester (North) ... 0 Ferrer, J.—Durham (South) ••• ••• , s 0 Fellowes, E.—H un ti ng d o nshire ••• " Ferguson, Colonel—Kirkaldy (burghs) ... 1 Ferguson, Sir R , —Londonderry (city) ... 1 Filme -r, Sir E.—Kent (West) 0 Fitzpatrick, ••• ••• —.—Queen's County ... 1 Fitzroy, Hon. H.—Lewes Hon. l' s ete e ;la . orough 01 Floyer, J.—Dor se t s hi re ••• Foley, —.—Worc es t ershi 1 0 Forbes, W.— Stirlingshirere Fordyce,,Captain—Aberdee l n;citys - ::: Forester, Hon. G. C. w Forster, M.—Berwi c k enlock ••• 0 Fortescue, Hon. J. ••• ••• 1 nastaple 1 Fox, S. L.—Beverley Fox, W. J.—Oldham Freestun, Colonel—Weymouth Galway, Viscount.—East Retford 11 . 1 Gardner, Richard.—Leicester (borough) 1 3 ...„• Gaskell, J. M.—Wenlock ( Gibson, Right Hon. T. M.—Manchester ;„ Gladstone, W. E.—Oxford University ~, 0 Glynn, C. C.—Kendal Goddard, A. L. — Cric klade ( • 1 ) Godson, R.—Kidderminster.- ... 0 Gooch, E. S.—Suffolk (East) •.. 0 Gordon. Admiral—Aberdeens hir e ... 0 Gore, o.—Shropshire (North) ••• 0 Goring, C.—Shoreham ••• •• • ••• Goulburn, Rt. Hon. IL—Camb. University 0 Gower, F. L.—Derby ••• ••• - . Graham, Si r J. 11.--Ripon ••• ••• 0 Granby, Marquis of—Stamford •• • "' Granger, T. C.—Durham (city) ••• ••• Greene', G.—_Wan•ington ••• 0 Greene, T.—Lancaster Gregson, S.—Lancaster *** •*** 1 Grenfell, C. w,...._ sandw Grenfell, P. W._ Presto n Presto Grey, R. —Tynem out h • • • • 1 ••• 1 Grogan, —.—Dubli n ( c i ty) 0 Grosvenor, Earl—Chester — Grosvenor, Lord x ••• 1 Guest, Sir J. J.—Merthyr Tydvil I Guiness, —.—Kinsale ••• 1 Gwyn, H.—Penryn and Falmouth • 0 0 kfaggitt, R. J.—Herefordshire Hale, R. B.—Gloncestershire (Wart) 0 0 Halford, Sir H.—Leicestershire (So u th) , Hall, Colonel—Buckingham (borough) „ 0 Ball, Sir B.—Marylebone 1 Halsey, T. P.—Hertfordshire 0 Hallyburton, Lord F. G.—Forfarshire „, Hamilton, J. H.—Dublin (County) ...0 Hanmer, Sir I.—Flint (boroughs)) ... 1 ... 1 ... 1 ... 1 ... 1 ~. 1 ... o ... 1. . . 0 ... 0 ... 0 ••• 0 ... 0 ... 1 ... 0 ... 1 o ... 1 ... 1 ~. o ... o ... 1 ... o ... o ... o ... o ... .i. ... 1 ... 0 ... o ... 1 ... 0 ... 1 ... o ... 1 ... o * A doublejettim Lib. Peel. Prot. Harcourt, G.—Oxfordshire 0 Hardcastle, J. A.—Colchester ••• .• • Harris, E. A. J.—Chri s t c hurch ... 0 'Hastie, A. —Paisley •• • .. ^• 1 Hastie, —.—Glasgow Hay, Lord J.—NN indsor ... 1 Hayter, W. G.—Wells 1 Headlam, T. E.—Newcastle-on. Tyne ... 1 Heald, J. —Stockport H ea thcoat, J.—Tiverton 1 Heathcote, G. J.—Rutlandshire 1 Heathcote, Sir W.—Hampshire (North) ... 0 Heneage, E.—Great Grimsby ... 1 Heneage, G. H. W.—Devizes 0 Henley, J. W.—Oxfordshire ... 0 Herbert, Rt. Hon. S.—Wiltshire (South)... 0 Herries, Right Hon. J. C.—Stamford .. 0 Hervey, Lord A.—Brighton Heywood—Lancashire 0 Hildyard, R. C.—Whitehaven 0 Hildyard, T. B.—Nottinghamshire (South) 0 Hill, Lord E.—Down County .. 0 Hill, Lord M.—Evesham 1 Hindley, C. —Ashton-under-Lyne... ... 1 Hodges, T.—Rochester 1 Hodies, T. L.—Kent ( West) ... 0 Hodgson, W. N.—Carlisle ... ... 0 Hogg, Sir J. W.—Honiton. . 0 Hollond, R.—Hastings ... ... ... 1 Hope, A. J. B.—Maidstone 0 Hope, H. T.—Gloucester (city) ... 0 Hope, Sir J.—Edinburghshire ... 0 Hornby, J.—Blackburne Horsman, G.—Cockennouth ..• 1 Hotham, Lord—Yorkshire (East) ... 0 Houldsworth, T.—Nottingham (North) ... 0 Howard, Hon. C.—Cumberland (East) 1 Howard, Hon. E. G.—Morpeth ... ... 1 Howard, Hon. J. K.—Mahnesbury ... 1 Hudson, George—Sunderland 0 Hughes, W. B.—Carnarvon Humphery, Alderman—Southwark ... 1 Hutt, W.—Gatesbead 1 Ingestrie, Lord—Staffordshire (South) ... 0 Inglis, Sir R. IL—Oxford University ... 0 Ireland, T. J.—Bewdley 0 Jackson, M.—Newcastle-under-Lyme ... 1 Jermyn, Earl—Bury St. Edmund's Jervis, Sir J.—Chester 1 Jervis, J.—Horsham Jocelyn, Lord—King's Lynn ... 0 Johnstone, Sir J. B. V.—Scarborough 0 Jolliffe. Sir W. G. H.—Petersfield 0 Jones, Sir W.—Cheltenham ... 0 Keppel, Colonel—Lymington 1 Kerr,_l{..—Downpatrick .. 0 Apatt,.. ... ... Keogh, —.—Athlone Kerrison, Sir E.—Eye ... ... 0 Knight, F. W.—Worcester (West) ... 0 Knightley, Sir C.—Northamptonshire (Sth) 0 Knox, Colonel B.—Marlow Labouchere, Right Hon. H.—Taunton ... 1 Lacy, C. —Bodmin 1 Langston, J. 11.—Oxford (city) ... 1 Lascelles, Hon. E.—Ripon Lascelles, Hon. W. S.—Knaresborough 0 Law, Hon. C. E.—Cambridge University... 0 Lawless, Hon. C.—Clonmel Lefevre, Right Hon. C. S.—liampsh. (N.) 1 Lennard, T. B.—Maldon Lennox, Lord A.—Yarmouth 0 Lennox, Lord H. G.—Chichester 0 Lethbridge, A.—Cricklade Lewis, G. C.—Herefordshire Lewis, Sir 'l. F.—Radnor (district) ... I Lincoln, Lord—Falkirk (Burghs) ... 0 Lindsay, Colonel—Wigan 0 Littleton, Hon. E. R.—Walsall 1 Locke, J.—lloniton 1 Lockhart, A. E.—Selkirkshire 0 Lockhart, W.—Lanarkshire ... ••• 0 Long, W.—Wilts (North) Lowther, Hon. H. C.—Westmoreland ... 0 Lushington, C.—Westminster 1 Lygon, H. B.—Worcester(West) ... 0 APCarthy, A.—Cork (city) 1 McGregor, J.—Glasgow 1 Mackinnon, W. A.—Lymington 0 M'Neill, D.—Argyleshire 0 M'Taggart, Sir J.—Wigtown (borough) ... 1 M‘Tavish, —.—Dundalk Mahon, Lord—Hertford ... ... 0 Mahon, O'G.—Ennis Mangles, R. D.—Guildford... 1 Manners, Lord C. S.—Leicester (North) ... 0 Manners, Lord G. J.—Cambridgeshire ... 0 March, Earl of—Sussex (West) ... 0 Marshall, J. G.—Leeds ... 1 _ _ Marshall, W.—Cumberland ( East) ... I Martin, S.—Pontefract 1 Martin, C. W.—Newport ... .. 0 Martin, J.—Tewkesbury ... .. ... I Masterman, J.—London 0 Matheson, —.—lnverness burghs ... 0 Matheson, T.—Ashburton 1 Maule, Right Hon. Fox—Perth I Maunsell, T. P.—Northampton (North) ... 0 Meagher—Waterford (city) •• • .. 1 Rielgund, Lord—Greenock Meux, Sir H.—Hertfordshire 0 Miles, P. W. S.—Bristol ... ... 0 Miles, W.—Somersetshire (East) ... 0 Milnes, R. M.—Pontefract I Milton, Lord—Wicklow (county) ... 1 Mitchell, T. A.—Bridport I Moffatt, G.—Dartrnotith Molesvcorth, Sir W.—Southwark ... Morpeth, Lord— Yorkshire (West) ... 1 ... 1 ... 1 Morris, D.—Carmarthen ... ... 1 Morrison, Gen.—Clackmannan and Kinross 1 Mostyn, E. M. L.—Flintshire 1 Mowatt, P.—Penryn and Falmouth ... 1 Nlulgrave,Earl of—Scarborough 1 Mundy, E. M. Derbyshire (South) ... 0 Mintz, G-F.—llirmin Olean Mure, Colonel—Renfrewshire 0 Neeld, J.—Cricklade Neeld, Joseph—Chippenham Newport, Viscount—Salop (South) • 4,41 0 Newry, Lord —Newry 0 Nicholl, Dr. J.—Cardiff .- 0 Noel, Hon. G.—Rutlandshire 1 Norreys, Sir D.—Mallow Norreys, Lord—Oxfordshire ... 0 Northland, Lord—Dungannon 0 Nugent, Lord—Aylesbury 1 O'Brien, J.—Limerick (city) ... 1 O'Brien, T.—Cashel O'Connell, D.—Waterford (city) ... 1 O'Connell, J.—Kilkenny (Borough) ... 1 O'Connell, J.—Limerick (city) ... I O'Connell,M.—Tralee 1 O'Connor, F.—Nottingham O'Flaherty, A.—Galway (borough) ... 1 Ogle, S.—Northumberland (South) ••• 1 OrdW.—Newcastle-on-Tyne 1 Osborne, R.—Middlesex 1 OswaldA.—Ayrshire 0 Owen, Sir J.—Pembroke (district) ... 1 Packe, Sir C. W.—Leicestershire (South) 0 Paget, Lord A.—Lichfield 1 Paget, Lord C.—Sandwich Paget, Lord G. A. F.—Beaumaris ... 1 Pakington, Sir J.—Droitwitch 0 Palmerston, Viscount—Tiverton 1 Palmer, R.—Berkshire 0 Palmer, R.—Plymouth ... ... 0 Parker, J.—Sheffield Patten, J. W.—Lancashire Pattison, J.—London Paulet, Lord—St. lye's 0 Pearson, C.—Lambeth 1 Pechell, Captain—Brighton. Peel, J.—Huntington Peel, Sir R.—Tamworth ..• 0 Peel, W. Yates—Tamworth Pennant—Carnarvonshire 0 Perfect, R.—Lewes ••• ... 1 Peto, S. M.—Norwich ... 1 Phillips, S. R.—Poole ••• ... 1 Pigott, F.—Reading ••• ••• ••• 1 Pigot, Sir R.—Bridgenorth ••• 0 Pilkington, J.—Blackburne • 1 Pinney, W. —Somersetshire (East) ••• 1 Plowden, W. H.—Newport (I. W.) ••• 0 Plumptre, J. P.—Kent (East) ... ••• 0 Price, Sir R.—Hereford 1 Prime, R.—Sussex (West) ••• •• Pryse, P.—Cardigan (district) ... 1 Pugh, D.—Montgomery • ••• ••• 0 Pusey, P.—Berkshire ... 1 Raphael, A.—St. Alban's 1 Rawdon, Colonel J. D.—Armagh... ... 1 Reid, Colonel—Windsor ... 0 Rendlesham, Lord—Suffolk (East) .. 0 Renton, J. C.—Berwick 0 Repton, G. W. J.—S t . Alb an ' s 0 Reynolds— Dublin (city) ." . 1 Ricardo, J. L.—S to k e - on-Trent .• 1 Ricardo, O.—Wo rcester ••• • 1 Rice, E. R.—Dover Rich, H.—Rich mon d . •• • •• • 1 Richards, R. — Merionethshire 0 Robarts, T. A. J.—Cornwall (East) ... 1 Robinson, G. R. —Poole Rolleston, Col.—Nottinghamshire (Swath) 0 Romilly, J.—Devonport Rothschild, the Baron L. de—London 1 Rufford, F.—Worcester Rushout, Captain—Worcestershire (East) 0 Russell, Lord J.—London Russell, T. C. H.—Bedfordshire .. 1 Russell, W.—Tavistock 1 Rutherford.—Leith (borough) 1 Sadleir, J.—Carlow (borough) Salwey, Colonel.—Ludlow 1 Sandars, G.—Wakefield ••• •:. • ( 1 ) Scholefield, W. —Birmingham ... 0 Scott, Hon. F.—Berwickshire . Scrope, G. P.—Stroud• Seaham, Viscount—Durham (North) ... Seeley, C.—Lincoln (city) ... •• • ••• Seymer, H. K.—Dorsetshire ••• •• 0 Seymour, Sir IL—Lisburn ..• ••• 0 1 Seymour, Lord—Totness ••• ••• Shafto, R. D.—Durham (North) ... •• 0 Shell, Right Hon. Sir R. L.—Dungannon... 1 Shelburne, Lord—Caine ••• ••• 1 Sheridan, 11.B.—Shaftesbury 1 Sibthorp, Colonel—Lincoln (city) ~. 0 Simeon, J.—lsle of Wight (County) ••• 1 Slaney, R. A.—Shrewsbury '••• ••• 1 Smith, Right Hon. R. V.—Northampton ... 1 S : in t tt h bh • : _s C kiy b r heater .. 1 • S u ••• ••• li cc?mbe ••• ••• •.. Smyth, Sir G. Il.—Colchester ••• 0 Smyth, J. G.—York (city) ••• 0 Smythe, G. A. F. P. S.—Canterb • ry • Somers, J. P.—Sligo (borough) u Somerton, Viscount —Wilton 1 Somerville, Sir W.—Drogheda • Sotheron, T. 11. Wilts (North) 1 Spearman, R. J.—Durham (city) ... • 1 Stafford, A.— Northampton (North) 0 Stanley, Rt. Hon. E. J.—Cheshire (North) 1 Stansfield, W. R. C.—Huddersfield Stanton, W. H.—Stroud Staunton, Sir G.—Portsmouth Stephenson, R.—Whitby 0 Strickland, Sir G.—Preston Strutt, Right Hon. E.—Derby ••• 1 Stuart, Lord D. C.-3larylebone 1 Stuart, H.—Bedford ( borough) ... 0 Stuart, J.—Newark ..• Sturt, H. G.—Dorchester ... Sutton, M.—Newark ••.. Ij• u 1 Sydney, Alderman—Stafford •• ••• Talfourd, T. N.—Reading ••• •• •' • 1 Tancred, H. W.—Banbury ••• Taylor, Colonel—Dublin (County) •• • .." . 0 Lib. Peel. Prot. Tennant, —.—Belfast 1 0 0 Thesiger, Sir F.—Abingdon • • •• 0 1 0 Thicknesse, R. A.—Wigan 1 0 0 Thompson, Alderman—Westmoreland ••• 0 0 1 Thompson, Colonel P.—Bradford ... 1 0 0 Thompson, G.—Tower Hamlets ... 1 0 0 Thornely, T.—Wolverhampton 1 0 0 Thornhill, G.—Huntingdonshire 0 0 1 Towneley, J.—Beverley 1 0 0 Townley, R. G.—Cambridgeshire 0 1 0 Tollemache, F.—Grantham 0 1 0 Tollemache—Cheshire (South) ... 0 0 Traill, G.—Caithnesshire ... 1 0 Trelawney, J. T.—Tavistoek 1 0 Trevor, Hon. G. R.—Carmarthenshire ... 0 0 Trollope, Sir J.—Lincolnshire (South) ... 0 . 0 Tufnell, H.—Devonport 1 0 Turner, E.—Truro ... ... •.. 1 0 Turner, G. J.—Coventry 0 1 Tynte, E. K.—Bridgewater ... 1 0 Tyrell, Sir J. T.—Essex (North) ... 0 0 Vane, Lord H.—Durham (South) ... 1 0 Verney, Sir H.—Bedford (borough) ... 1 0 Vesey, —.—Queen's County ... 0 0 Villiers, Hon. C. P.—Lancashire (South)... 1 0 Villiers, Hon. C. P.—Wolverhampton ... 1 0 Villiers, Lord—Cirencester ... •.. ... 0 1 Vivian, J. E.—Truro ••• •.• ••• 0 0 Vivian, J. H.—Swansea 1 0 Vyse, R. K. H.—Northamptonshire (South) 0 Vyvyan, Sir R. R.—Helston Urquhart, D.—Stafford 0 Waddington, D.—Maldon 0 Waddington, H. S.—Suffolk (West) ... 0 Wakley, T.—Finsbury 1 Walmsley, Sir R. J.—leicester (borough)... 1 Walker, R.—Bury, Lancashire ... 1 Walsh, Sir J.—Radnorshire Walter, J.—Nottingham 0 Wall, C. B.—Salisbury 1 Walpole, S. H. Midhurst 0 Ward, H. G.—Sheffield 1 Wawri, J. T.—South Shields ... •• • 1 Welby, G. E.—Grantham 0 Wellesley, Lord C,—Hants (South) .. 0 West, F. R.—Denbigh (district) .. 1 Westenra, Colonel—King's County ‘Vesthead, J. P.—Knaresborough ... 1 Whitmore, T. C.—Bridgenorth 0 Wilcox, P. M.—Southampton 1 Williams, T. P.—Marlow 0 Williams, —.—Macclesfield Willoughby, Sir H.—Evesham 0 Wilson, James—Westbury 1 Wilson, ➢i.—Clitheroe 1 Wodehouse, E.—Norfolk (East) ... 0 Wood, Sir C.—Halifax Wood, W. P.—Oxford (city) ... 1 Worcester, Marquis of—Gloucestershire (E.) 0 Wrightson, W. B.—Northallerton 1 Wyld, J.—Bodmin 0 W.-viil, M.—Richmond ... ... ... 1 Yorke, Hon. E. T.—Cambridgeshire .. 0 Yorke, H. R.—York (city) ... ... ... 1 MEMBERS RETURNED. Liberals ... 280 Peelites Protectionists ... 163 ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. WESTERN ClRCUlT.—Bridgewater, Aug. 9. (Before Chief Justice Wu.DE.) Maurice Perry was indicted for the wilful murder of John Bailey, a constable, whilst engaged in the execu tion of his duty, on the 28th of June, at Bathampton. Mr. Phinn and Mr. Cole were counsel for the prose cution, and Mr. Saunders defended the prisoner. Mr. PHINN, in detailing the facts of the case to the jury, observed that it had been laid down by one of our text writers that the ministers of justice, when in the ex ecution of their duty, were under the peculiar protection of the law; and if a peace-officer came to suppress an affray and was killed, it was murder, although the party did not know who the constable was. The following was the evidence adduced:— Isaac Smith—l am a miller living at Bathampton. On the evening of the 28th of :June I was at the George Inn. There were many railway labourers in the tap room. Solomon Daynton, John Potter, Maurice Perry, and Samuel Crawley were there. There was a quarrel between Daynton and Potter, and a challenge to tight was given, and they went out into the field and fought. The prisoner seconded Potter, and Crawley seconded Daynton. There were 60 or 70 persons present. After the men had fought two or three rounds Thomas Smith came and told them they must give over fighting for he was a constable. Some man knocked Smith down. John Bailey, the deceased, then came into the ring, and told them they must stop fighting. Some one asked him who he was, and he said he was a constable called to assist. Bailey was pushed out of the ring. He came back again into the ring. A crowd of men got round Bailey. I saw the prisoner and Crawley close to him in a fighting position. Some one said they would kill every constable that came into the field. Perry had on a fustian waistcoat and a yellow cap. Crawley was in his shirt sleeves, and he wore a blue cloth cap. I went to assist Smith, who had been knocked down, and when I looked round I saw Bailey in the people's arms. Cross-examined—lt was a moonlight night. Crawley was acting very violently. Bailey did not appear to be in liquor; he had been hay-making. There was a lad there named Samuel Bence, who was very tipsy. Crawley had on a blue smock frock when he came into the field; he took it off during the fight. Isaac Aplin—l am a labourer, living at Bath, and was at the fight, and had been at the George before the fi ght. I saw Bailey at the fight. H e wa lk e d up to the prisoner and said, " I am a constable, and if you don't give up fighting I must take you." The prisoner directly knocked him down with his fist. He got up, and another man came up in a smock frock and knocked him down again. He got up, and Perry struckhim again, but did not knock him down. Ever so many more thea hit The jury again consulted together for some time, and ' when they turned round many of them were in tears. The foreman then returned a verdict of Guilty. The Clerk of Assize . then addressed th e prisoner— M au rice Perry, you will remember you were indicted for the wilful murder of John Bailey. Upon your arraign ment you pleaded not guilty, and for your trial put yourself upon your country, which country hath found you guilty ; .have you anything to say why the Court should not give you judgment to die according to law ? The prisoner remained silent. The CHIEF JUSTICE, having put on the black cap, proceeded to pass sentence upon the prisoner in the following terms :—Maurice Perry, you have been found guilty of having murdered the deceased man, John Bailey. If the law were not strong enough to vindicate the death of one of its officers in the peace able execution of his duty, we must cease to live under the protection of the law. The circumstances under which this man has received his death, either by your hands or with your concurrence, are such as call pecu liarly upon the law to vindicate its justice and its pewer. The mate is called upon to execute his duty in suppress ing a fight then going on in di s t u rb an ce of the public into peace. He enters the field. He does no one act of violence, nor utters one expression but what he is justi. feed in doing. It is painful, indeed, to perceive that any set of Englishmen could be met together for any purpose who could join in beating and kicking a police-officer acting quietly and . soberly in th e execu ti on o f his duty, without one hand being raised to protect him, or one voice uttering a single word for mercy. Many will feel for your situation, standing at the bar of justice as you now do; but it is not alone for the offender that pain should be felt, it is for the unfoi tunate man whose life you have been one of the instruments in taking away. He was doing his duty, enforcing the law; you were breaking the law, for you were acting with cruel vio lence, and inflicted death upon him. How Englishmen could see him upon the ground, surrounded by you and others, and repeating your violence, is degrading to the character of the country. The jury have evidently given a painful and anxious attention to your case. In my opinion they could, consistently with their con sciences or their oaths, or in discharge of their duty, pronounce no other verdict. You are not convicted upon the evidence of one man; you are not con victed upon the evidence of several speaking to one act, but several speak to your declarations and to your ac's all combining to establish beyond all reasonable doubt that you have been guilty of the crime for which you were indicted. You were the second of one of these men. What was your conduct when the peace-officers came into the field? Did you, when you learnt that they were peace-officers, take any steps towards suppressing the . fight? Quite the contrary. Look at yo ur ac t s , an d see if they do not tend to one common conclusion, that you were determined to continue that fight by resisting the officers to any extent. I say to any extent, for you pur sued your course even to the death of the unfortunate man. Can it be supposed for one moment that any set of lawless persons, whether railway labourers or others, ever will be strong enough to murder the peace-officers of the land w ith i mpun i ty ? I t s h ou ld b e k nown i n this country, and is known except by those disposed to set the law at defiance, that every peace-officer re presents the whole force of the law and justice of the country, and will ever be Protected. You may murder the man upon the spot, but justice and the whole power of the country is pledged to vindicate his death. You have sent that man, as he himself cried, "in the midit of his sins," before his Maker to answer for his deeds. You are called for judgment; you have an opportunity for repentance ; you have an opportunity to ask for that mercy which you denied to him. The offence is one for which I by law can pronounce but one sentence, and there is, I apprehend, but one sentence that any system of justice could require. You have mur dered an innocent man; you have deprived hie family of . his prot ec ti on an d th e co mfort they derived from hi m . If you so little regarded the life of another, can your life be spared consistently with the public safety? I appre hend one conclusion only follows. In the remark I make to you it is no part of my object to add to your affliction or your sufferings—it is, that the justice of the law may be seen, in the hope that the unhappy example you are about to exhibit, may operate as an awful warning upon others, and save many others who might but for that fall into the same crime; it is, that it may be known that peace-officers must be respected—that it may be known that violent men shall not take the life of another without their own lives becoming forfeited. It is for that purpose alone that I do not content myself i b y merely passing upon you the awful sentence which it s my duty to pro nounce. I deeply regret that I cannot discover in the evidence anything that would justify me in holding out to you a hope that the sentence will notcarried in to effect. effect. I should do you injustice if I did not call upon you seriously to anticipate the very short period when you are to appear before your God—if I did not tell you that your earthly course is run. All that remains is for repentance, and asking for that mercy for which you have so much need. I, therefore, have only now to pass upon you the sentence for the crime of wilful murder. His Lordship then pronounced the awful sentence of the law. The prisoner, who was a very powerful man, remained unmoved durirg the trial, and, after sentence was pro nounced, said,—lle was innocent, he had never kicked the man. The court was densely crowded. Bailey and kicked him. I heard one of the men say he was dead, and -I helped to pick him up and carry him into the house. Perry never spoke to Bailey that I heard. When he struck him it was by the side of the head. Cross-examined—There had been some drinking at the George. I had known the prisoner before for about a month. I went over there to try and get some work I merely looked on at the fight. The persons in the crowd were hitting each other indiscriminately. Samuel Bence—l am twelve years old. I remember the fight. I work on the railway. I saw Bailey tap Potter on the shoulder and say, " I am a constable, and I must stop it." The fighting was then going on. Perry and Crawley were then seconding the men who were fighting. I saw Crawley hit Bailey on the side of the head. The blow knocked him down. Perry then kicked him in the stomach. Bailey said, " Lord have mercy upon me in the midst of my sins." I was then five yards from Bailey. George Bindons picked Bailey up, and he and some others carried him in-doors. Cross-examined—l had had half a pint of small beer. I was not tipsy. Some one has told me that I nearly tumbled into the canal as I was going home that night ; but that was not correct. I got up the next morning at half-past five o'clock. I was not ill. I have not told any one that I expect to get a lot of money for coming here. Charles Hunt went home with me that night. No acci dent happened to me as I was going home. Mr. Batten—l was inspector of the works on the Wilts and Somerset Railway at Bathampton. I know the pri soner. He had been at work on the railway. I saw Potter and Daynton go out to fight. They fought under the shadow of a tree. Smith came and interfered, and directly afterwards Bailey came into the field, and said to some one, " I'm a constable, and must take you into custody." Th e p r i soner said, " Mention no names, go at it I saw the prisoner strike at some one with his left hand, and at the same time Crawley struck in the same direction with his right hand. I could not see the man who said he was the constable. I heard some one fall. I then left the field. I heard a voice say, "He was a constable." Ido not swear whether the man who fell had been in the field before or not. Cross-examined—The fight was a fair one. I saw Samuel bench before the fight; he appeared, as I fancied, as if he had been drinking. Charles Denney—l am a labourer at Bathwick. I was coming towards the George Inn between nine and ten o'clock. I went into the field. I saw a parcel of people, and Daynton and Potter fighting. I was with Thomas Smith at this time. I saw Smith knocked down when he went towards the fight, but I do not know who did it; the person stood by Perry. Samuel Crawley kicked him after he was down. I got Smith up. Bailey then came into the field up to Perry, and said he was a tithing-man, and must stop it. The man standing by Perry then knocked Bailey down, saying, " If you are a tithing-man, I'll let: you know." Samuel Crawley then kicked Bailey, and I took him up and helped him into the house; he was in his shirt sleeves at this time. I know Bailey to be a constable. George Bence—l saw Smith come into the field. He was knocked down. I saw Bailey come. I advised him not to go into the mob. He said he must do his duty. The prisoner asked Bailey for his authority. Bailey said he had no warrant. He was then knocked down by some one. Thomas Smith—l was a constable, and went into the field. I told them not to fight. I was knocked down, and kicked when I was down. I saw Bailey come into the field just as I was knocked down. Mary Bindon—My father went into the fieldwith Bailey. I rem a i ne d outside. I saw Crawley hit Bailey three times out of the crowd. The surgeon stated that there was an injury to the brain, which might have been caused by a blow. There was another injury to a vein near the collar• bone, which caused a rupture of the vein. The blood had flowed from that rupture, which must have caused instant death. Mr. SAUNDERS addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner. Chief Justice WILDE then summed up the case to the jury. It was for them to ascertain whether there had been one common purpose to prevent the deceased from putting an end to that fight. If they should ascertain that there were persons engaged in that unlawful pur pose, then the second question would be whether the prisoner was one of those who were so engaged? Did he himself give the blow, or did he aid and assist others in the common object? If he did either he was guilty of murder. Their solemn and awful duty was to look cautiously around this evidence, attending to what the prisoner had said, and what he had done. They must exercise their judgment upon the whole case, and recol lect that they were the constitutional tribunal to pro nounce their verdict according to their own view of the evidence. OXFORD ClRCUlT.—Gloucester, Aug. 9. CROWN COURT.—(Before Mr. Justice ERLE.) Mr. Justice Erie entered the Crown Court, which was densely crowded, at nine o'clock this morning, when John Skinner, aged 30, was arraigned on an indict ment, charging him with the wilful murder of Sarah Skinner, his wife, at Clifton, on the Ist of June. Mr. Skinner conducted the prosecution, and Ur. Had dleston defended the prisoner. It appeared that the prisoner occupied, with his wife and two children, a room on th e thi r d story o f t h e h ouse, No. 4, Limekiln-lane, Bristol, and it would seem, from the general tenor of the evidence, was in the habit of ill-using his wife. On the evening preceding the day named in the indictment, her brother Irving called to see them, and the deceased complained of being ill, which she said had been caused by falling off a ladder, giving at the same time a significant lock at her husband. On the evening of the Ist of J une, which was Tuesday, the day of the death of the unfortunate woman, Irving again called on them about half past seven o'clock, when his sister complained of bruises. She did not say how they had been caused, but her husband said he had beaten her. The husband was then poorly, and was lying on the bed. Irving observed that the hearth brush was broken, and asked how it occurred ? The prisoner said he had broken it on Sally (meaning his wife). Irving said it was a shame a family should quarrel in such a way. A few more obser vations of a similar nature passed, and the prisoner then ordered Irving out of the house, and got up from the bed to put him out by force. His sister clung to him, ando would d be m gg u e r d der hihmenno Theyt to go, as if he did the prisoner all three struggled together, and fell on the floor. The priso ner eventua lly got up, w ran to the cupboard, took out a knife, and forced Irving out of the room down three or four stairs. He then returned to the room, and in a minute afterwards heard a crash. He went down stairs and saw his sister lying on the pavement, outside the house, covered with blood, and supported by a woman. He went for a policeman, and the body was carried into tho house. She breathed twice, and then expired. The body, in a bending position, was observed by a witness falling from the upper window. As it came dow n , it t urne d wat is called a surnmerset, the heels striking the lower window, and the body falling on the head. A man in the pri soner's room was afterwards observed to put his arm out, and close the window from which the deceased, who was rather a powerful woman, had fallen. The policeman went up stairs to the prisoner, who asked where his wife was. The officer told him she was lying dead down stairs, on which he lifted up his hands and gave a smile. These were the facts of the case, as proved at great length by the witnesses called for the prosecution. Mr. HUDDLSSTON, on the part of the prisoner, called an intelligent boy named Daniel Clanney, who deposed that he slept on the landing, near the prisoner's room, on the evening in question, and was awoke by hearing Irving and Skinner scuffling and fighting. He got out of bed, and got on a chair, when he saw the unfortunate deceased catch hold of the top of the window and throw herself out backwards, as the prisoner was re-entering the room. The prisoner betrayed no emotion, but closed the window, and went to bed, where he remained until the officer came up to him. The lad was cross-examined at great length as to the facts he had deposed, but his testimony was not at all shaken. Mr. SKINNER having replied, His LORDSHIP carefully Summed up, and The jury, after some deliberation , returned a verdict of Not Guilty, which was received with considerable surprise in court. The trial occupied nearly six hours. NORTHERN CIRCUIT. —Lancaster, August 9. The commission was opened hero on Saturday by Mr. Justice Wightman, who attended the parish church yes terday. The Chief Baron did not arrive till seven o'clock last evening. The business commenced ateleven o'clock this morning. There are eleven causes in the list, of which six were disposed of in an hour. The calendar contains the names of sixteen prisoners, five of whom are charged with—one manslaughter, three others with sep arate manslaug h ter s ; two with wounding with intent, one to m ur d er , a nd he other to do grievous bodily harm • two with felonious a ssaults on infa nts; two with st ea li ng; an d tw o with conspiracy to defraud. The Chi e f B aron presides i n the Crown Court, and Mr Justice Wightman at Nisi Prius. Edward P ar k er J o h n nisileY, (Before the CHIEF BAR ON. ) Josh. Drape, Thomas Johnson, and Thomas Yates, five young apparently working men, were indicted for the manslaughter of Edward Seward, at Lancaster, on the 4th of July last. It appeared that the 4th of July was the Sunday befor e th e races here, and t h a t the custom is on that day to s e ll li quors in booths erec t e d on the race ground, and Park er on that day mee ting with the deceased, had some words, and then fought a fter the pugilistic manner, in rounds, an d the battl lasted near an hour. At the last round, P arker put his arm rou nd the neck of the e deceas.ll, who was then on his knees, and struck him several blows on the neck, and be became soon after in sensible, and was carried into a booth, and a surgeon sent for. Becomin g worse , he wiis taken home. The other prisoners acted as seconds—Custley and Johnson for Parker, and the other two for the deceased. Mr. W. G. Moss ' surgeon, said he was called in about one o'clock on the morning of the sth, and found Seward in a comatose state — qu i te i n sensible. Ho h a d several severe contusions on the head and neck , He , bled him, and about seven o'cl oc k t h e same m orning. He attributed applied mustard plasters , but he died his death to an e ff us i on of the b ra i n , produced by ex ternal violence; but, on examination, ho admitted he could not 55 Y positively that it was so produced, It The jury, having evidently considered the case most anxiously for some time, said they found the prisoner " Guilty of being a party concerned, but we have no evi dence of his having given the fatal blow." The CHIEF JUSTICE said, " Guilty of being concerned in what, gentlemen ?" One of the jurors —In the murder, my Lord. The CUIEF JUSTICE—If ,he was there with others, having a common object to prevent the peace. officer from putting an end to the fight, that amounts to the crime of murder, A double returs, THE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, AUGUST 11, 1847. might, possibly, have been produced by his own exer tions in the fight; and thereupon, Mr. JAMES, for the prosecution, admitting that ho could carry the case no farther, _ _ His LORDSHIP asked Mr. Moss if he could not, by a post mortem examination, have known certainly the cause of death, and he answered that he could, but he was not permitted to make one. It transpired that in this dis trict the coroner did not order such examinations, be cause the justices in sessions will not allow the expenses of them. Under this uncertainty as to the cause of death, his Lordship directed the jury to Acquit the prisoner. Isaac Brochbank, aged 35, a labourer, was indicted for the manslaughter of Betty Bradshaw, at Forton, a village about six miles from this place, on the 11 th of June last. It appeared from the evidence of the deceased's hus band, that they would both be 71 years old at Michael mas next ; that the prisoner and they had been on bad terms (the old man said for eight and thirty years); that a short time before they had quarrelled, and that on the day named the prisoner was in the lane, near the cottage of the deceased, when in consequence of some thing the prisoner L:aid, the deceased came out to him, and high words ensued. He, to provoke her to strike him, held up his arm and said what he would do if she should strike him. She however did strike him, and he then struck the old woman with all his might on the breast, and knocked her down. The old man came up and struck the prisoner with his stick, and the prisoner knocked him down, and then went away, and the old man helped his wife into the house. On the morrow a surgeon was called in, and ho found her thigh broken near the hip. lie had attended her recently be fore for diseased stomach, and though ho now said he confidently believed that the injury she had received had accelerated her death, he could not say positively what was the cause of death. He had asked the Coroner to order a post-mortem examination, but he refused, say ing it was not necessary for the inquisition, or he could Probably have stated satisfactorily what was the cause of death The CIIIEF BARON said he did not know on what principle the warrant for a post-mortem examination was refused. The Coroner was entirely wrong in law, and in fact to refuse it, when the medical man wished for it, in order to ascertain the cause of death. His Lordship then said, that under these circumstances the charge of manslaughter could not be sustained ; and Mr. M'AusnEY, who appeared for the prisoner, having intimated that he could not defend him against v.common assault, His LORDSIIIP told the jury they might find the prisoner guilty of an assault if they thought fit, and they did so. His LORDSIIIP then, having made some severe re marks on his unmanly conduct in striking the de ceased, an old woman of 71 years of age, with all the strength and vigour of a man of 35, sentenced the pri soner to be imprizoued, and kept to hard labour, twelve calendar months. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. A country gentleman, who at first gave the name 01 William Jones and then of Thomas Somes, was re examined before Aldermen Sidney and Humphery, charged with indecently assaulting three lads while they were standing in the Guildhall, and looking on at the polling on the preceding day. Mr. Buchan, who attended for the prisoner, being asked who his client really was, replied he declined giv ing his address, hut he was a gentleman of fortune, who had come up to London to purchase some Bank Stock. I - fe understood he had hitherto borne an irreproachable character, and it was incredible that he should have con ducted himself in the way described. Evidence having been given, The prisoner said he was innocent. lie might have touched them, but there was a conspiracy to charge him. The Magistrates consulted and concurred in commit- ting the prisoner for trial at the Central Criminal Court. He was admitted to bail himself in 2001., and one surety in 200/., Mr. Starling of the Stock Exchange, becoming his bail. George Pitt and Lawrence Salmon were charged with knocking at a door in the night time without lawful ex cuse, and with being riotous and resisting a policeman in the execution of his duty. Mr. Mellor, the barrister, defended the prisoners. Mr. Sergeant, of 48, Jewin-street, solicitor, stated that he had bee❑ annoyed for some time by Salmon, who formerly lodged in the same house. Last night, shortly before twelve, he heard a knocking at the door. As all the lodgers were in he at first thought there might be a fire, and listened. He overheard his landlady calling from the window," Who is there?" which was answered by a meaningless or derisive ejaculation of bah ! or ah! He went down and asked if he should go down and open the door, as he heard the parties continued the an noyance, laughing and knocking. She asked him to come to the window of her room, and he found it was the prisoners, and that the policeman was there. Cross-examined by Mr. Mellor—Had been employed by the prisoner Salmon to adjust an action. Did not know they came to him about that action. Salmon had called frequently before to annoy him. Butler, the police-officer, said he endeavoured for soma time to coax them away. At last one of them pushed him off the pavement, and the other caught hold of him by the elbow. On the way to the station- house they endeavoured to escape. Mr. Mellor wished to address the Magistrates on the evidence. Mr. Alderman liumPunaY said they had heard quite enoubgh about it. Mr. Mellor said he stood upon his right to be heard. Mr. Alderman HUMPHERY said he could not show they had a right to disturb the people in the house and neighbourhood at twelve o'clock at night. We shall fine each of them 10s. under the Police Act. Mr. Mellor said that was very irregular. They were trangressing their duty as magistrates in deciding with out hearing the defence. Mr. Alderman HUMPHERY said he did not care for his observations. The prisoners could have no right to knock at the door at midnight, and annoy the residents. Mr. Mellor replied he was sorry he had not an oppor tunity of expressing elsewhere, and in stronger terms, his opinion of such conduct. Mr. Alderman HUMPHERY said he might express his opinion where he liked, and how he liked. Mr. Mellor bowed and.retired. CLERKENWELL. Charles Lchofleid,head waiter at the Belvidere Ta vern, Penton-street, Pentonville, was placed at the bar, charged by Mary Anne Mullings with having violently assaulted her. The complainant deposed that on Thursday night last, at eleven o'clock, she left White Conduit "louse, when it was raining very fast. She went into the Belvidere Tavern for shelter, and was shaking the wet off her clothes, when it went on some of the glasses on the bar counter. The defendant came behind her, and seizing her, threw her violently into the road and kicked her, by which she was severely bruised. Mr. TYRWIIITT asked if she had any witnesses? Complainant—There were the women who were with me, but they have been bribed not to appear, no doubt, as they have removed from their lodgings since the assault. tion, but which, in its general appearance, as the magis trate held it up, appeared uninjured. Mr. BRODERIP—Do you mean to swear this hat is cut to pieces? Complainant (hesitatingly)—lt is not exactly cut to pieces, but it is much broken. Mr. BRODERIP—Did you wear it to this Court? Com plainant—l did. Mr. BRODERIP—CouId you have done so had it been cut and broken all to pieces as you have sworn? Com plainant—No. Complainant added that the blow did not injure his head, but it would have done so if he had not had his hat on. George Tookley, assistant money•taker at the pier, was called to confirm complainant's statement, but his account of the transaction was much at variance with it. In the course of his evidence he stated that the gentleman was told the boat would be there in a minute or two, but although pressed by the magistrate to state how:long after thatit was before the boat actually arrived, no very positive answer could be obtained from him. He, however, would not swear that Mr. Almond and the ladies had not waited for the boat full three quarters of an hour. His account of the violence of the assault was much stronger than that of the complainant himself. He described it as a dreadful blow which knocked the complainant down senseless in the box for the moment, and added that it stunned him. He also took credit to himself for having wrenched the stick out of the gentleman's hand. Although cautioned that what he said there might subject him to a prosecution in another Court, he persevered in his statement. Mr. BRODERIP—You have stated that complainant said something about defendant's being like a butcher. Is that the sort of language uttered by the money takers at the Cadogan-pier to the public ? Witness— Oh, no, sir ; he was in a passion. Mr. BRODERIP—WiII you swear such language has not been frequently addressed to the public before ? Witness—l am sure I cannot say. Mr. BRODERIP stopped the case by observing, that a prima facie case of assault had been made out ; andi 1 he were to go on with the inquiry, and come to the conclusion, that defendant was guilty of the charge, the highest penalty he had the power to inflict, 51., would be no punishment to a person in his condition of society. Others of a corresponding grade, to whom 51. would be but of trifling consideration, might say, " I shall amuse myself, by assaulting any person whom I please, or with whom I may have any difference," and having paid that penalty, may repeat the offence at pleasure. The worthy Magistrate wished to be distinctly understood that he came to no conclusion as to the merits of this case, as there might, for aught he knew, be very strong evidence produced in answer to it on the other side. He must, however, say the evidence which had been adduced was extremely suspicious. He felt it to be his duty to send it to the sessions, and defendant must put in bail, himself in 401., and two sureties in 201., to ap pear there. Mr. TYRVIIIITT—Are they unfortunate women ? Complainant—Yes. Defendant indignantly denied the assault as described by complainant, or having kept the witnesses out of the way. She came into the house at half-past 11 o'clock, with her shawl over her head, her person exposed. Mr. M'Diarmid's (the landlord's) neice, called him to remove her, saying her conduct and language were offensive. Ile put her out as gently as possible, when she fell on the pavement, and not on the road. Mr. M'Diarmid attended with Mr. Brown, of Upper street, Park-street, Islington, and his nephew, who gave evidence that the complainant, on being gently put out, fell down, and said defendant had struck her, but he did not do so. Mr. TYRWIIITT said he was quite satisfied that the complainant was in a state of excitement, and that no more force was used than was necessary to eject her and protect the respectability of Mr. M'Diarmid's house and family from indecent annoyance. He should dismiss the complaint, as she had brought it all upon herself. WESTMINSTER. Mr. William Almond, Old Bond-street, army accoutre• ment maker, was charged with assaulting Richard Ilor lock, money-taker to the Iron Steam-boat Company, at the Cadogan Pier, Chelsea. Complainant stated that on Sunday afternoon, the Ist inst., from three to a quarter past, three persons came to the pier, and defendant, who was one of the party, took three tickets and paid for them to go up the river. Defendant then asked how long it would be before the boat arrived, and complainant having replied that it would be there at twenty minutes to four, the gentleman went with his party on to the pier. After having re mained there about half an hour, during which time no boat arrived, defendant came up to the platform where complainant was stationed, and abused him very much. Complainant begged of him to pass on, said he would return his money, and referred him to Messrs. Cattarns and Fry, secretaries to the company. Complainant gave him sixpence, the amount he had paid, and defendant returned the three tickets. Complainant again begged of him to pass on, but he paid no attention to the re quest, and continued to abuse him. At last complainant said to defendant, " You put me in mind of a butcher," upon which defendant immediately hit him over the head with a stick, and struck him on the hat. Com plainant immediately got out of his box, and held de fendant, after he had made a second attempt to strike him, until a policeman came up, previous to which he wrenched the stick out of defendant's hand. Defendant went to the station and gave his address. Complainant, in his cross-examination by Mr. Woolley, of Lincoln's Inn, who attended on behalf of the defendant, said that the defendant did not come at three o'clock to the pier, it was ten minutes afterwards. Complainant did not point out several boats as those by which he was to go, as they came up the river. De fendant did not say that he would write to the papers, to let the public knew how grossly they were deceived. He struck him because he said he was like a butcher. Complainant did not say to the defendant that he was a butcher out of place ; he did not say he was ‘' mouthing" there. Defendant had a lady and a little girl, about fifteen years of age with him. Mr. Woolley—Was he dressed, and did he look as he does now? Complainant —Yes. Mr. Woolley-90 your oath, Sir, does he look like a butcher ? Complainant took a hasty glance at Mr. Almond, who is a person of very gentlemanly appear ance, and replied—l cant't tell ; I made use of the ex pression after what he had said to me. Mr. 13aoDErtre—What was the thickness of the stick? Complainant—About two inches round at the top. Mr. BRODERIP—Was it a violent blow? Complainant —He struck me as hard as he could. Mr. BRODERIP—Of course , str iking vou wrai 'wavy stick like that, it cut your hat very mush? Complainant —lt cut it all to pieces. Mr. BRODERIP called for the production of the hat, which was 1)3 1 .104 bout 011 vale tat) On a am 0012141§' LAMBETH. A number of the inhabitants, and the owners of pro perty in the vicinity of the firework manufactory of Mr. Darby, in Regent-street, Lambeth, where the terrific explosion took place on Saturday last, attended before Mr. Elliott to request his magisterial intervention to prevent the continuance, in a crowded and densely populated neighbourhood, of a manufactory so danger -ois and destructive to life and property as that carried on by Mr. Darby. Mr. Francis, a respectable tradesman, who was the spokesman, related to the magistrate the particulars of the serious explosion that took place on the premises of Mr. Darby on Saturday last, and said that such was the state of terror in which the inhabitants of the neighbour hood were kept in, by the frequency of such explosions, and the renewal of the dangerous manufacture, that every one who could would leave their present places of abode, so that unless some immediate step were taken to put an end to the manufacture of fireworks there, the owners of property would be seriously injured. Mr. Francis here handed to the magistrate a rough sketch which he had made of the premises of Mr. Darby, and said that it was a remarkable fact that five different parts of them, and those some distances apart, were on fire at the same instant. He particularly directed Mr. Elliott's attention to one small and detached building about the middle of the premises, which was called the Magazine," and said he understood that there were deposited there no less than five or six hundred weight of gunpowder at the time of the explosion; but this for tunately escaped ignition, though part of the roof of the building had been carried away. This building, he said, was not more than twelve or fourteen feet from one of the sheds that had been burnt down, and had one of the rockets or other fireworks penetrated this buildings, the sacrifice of human life and the destruction of property must have been terrific. In conclusion, Mr. Francis said that it was not more than a few weeks since an ex plosion, though not of so serious a character as that of Saturday, took place on the premises of Mr. Darby, and since he took possession of them there had been no fewer than six or seven explosions. Several of the inhabitants of the vicinity complained of being kept in a state of considerable terror and alarm since the explosion, and in perpetual dread that one of a still more serious character would occur. The owners of house property in the vicinity also complained that their tenants had given them warning to quit, owing to the continuance of the manufactory, and expressed a hope that the magistrate would put the law in force to remove so dangerous a nuisance. Mr. ELLIOTT inquired if there was any proof that the manufacture of the fireworks had been resumed since the explosion on Saturday ? Mr. Francis replied that he could not prove the fact from his own personal know ledge, but would be enabled, he had no doubt, of proving the fact satisfactorily by the testimony of other wit nesses, and that they went to work on Sunday. Mr. ELLIJTT then granted a summons, under the Building Act, against Mr. Darby. Mary Brown and Mary Ann Johnson, two well-dressed young women, were placed at the bar on a charge of "ringing the changes" at the Two Sawyers public• house, in Palace New-road, Lambeth. Mrs. Smith, the landlady, deposed, that two hours before, the prisoners came into her house and had two glasses of wine, in payment for which they gave her a sovereign. She gave them half a sovereign and the remainder in silver. They remained for some time before the front of the bar, when Brown said the half sovereign was a bad one, and requested to have it changed. Witness took up the half sovereign, and at once saw that it was a counterfeit, and not the one she had given them, and challenged them with " ringing the changes." They were very anxious to get the coin back, but she (witness) had been done before, and re fused to give it to them, and gave them into custody. The constable who took the prisoners into custody said they had been carefully searched, but no half sovereign was found on them. The prisoners declared that the coin produced was the one which they had received from Mrs. Smith. Mrs. Smith declared that it was Johnson who was so anxious to get back the half sovereign after she took it up. The prisoners were remanded. THE LATE ACCIDENT ON THE BRISTOL AND BIRMINGHAM RAILWAY. BIRMINGIIAM—On Monday last an inquest was commenced before Ralph Docker, Esq., Coroner, at Kingsnorton, on the body of Warburton, the unfor tunate man who was killed on the above line of rail way on Friday night last. Mr. Sanders, secretary for the above-named, at tended to watch the proceedings, and to give any in formation which the jury might require. The first witness examined was— Thomas Fletcher, who deposed that he was a fire man in the employment of the Midland Railway Company, and that he knew the deceased, John War burton, who was an engine -driver, working on the Midland Railway. At ten minutes to nine o'clock on Friday night last, the 6th inst., the deceased and he (witness) left Gloucester with the mail train for Birmingham. The engine was driven by deceased, and he acted as fireman to him. They had no acci dent or break down until the train arrived to within half a mile of the level crossing at Kingsnorton, at which spot witness felt the engine give a roll, and two or three lurches, and instantly after she fell upon her side. The train was upon the left hand line of the rails, and the engine went off the line, and then fell back again upon it. Witness held on by the bottom part of the spring balance, to which he clung until the engine had settled. When he be came a little recovered he called out to deceased, but received no reply. The steam at the time was not turned off, and the engine wheels began to revolve again, whereupon he jumped on the steps, and tried to find the regulator, but failed in the at tempt. Messengers were dispatched up and down the line to prevent lugga ge t ra i ns f rom pass i ng e i ther way until the road wa s c l eare d . Wi tness then pro cured a light, and commenced searching for deceased, but could not find him. He was discovered shortly after quite dead. After the occurrence, and before deceased was found, witness examined the metals. About forty yards from where the engine lay he found one of the chairs either broke or with the key out ; the metals were, he believed, straight ; one of them had got out of place for about one-half of the breadth. It was one of the outside rails, and had been forced outwards. It was the end of the rail which they came upon first that was out of place, and not the end as the engine left it. The end of the rail adjoining was torn, but in its place. About! twenty yards nearer to the engine, one of the outside rails was curved inward between the two lines at one end, and fast at the other. Whether the rail was broken, or broke out, or broke out from the chair, he did not know. He found that the engine had run off the line at the spot where the chair was broken. There were three carriages (first class) and a luggage van attached to the tender. The van and two of the carriages were off the line ; the former was thrown over. He believed no person was injured except de ceased and himself. The engine was in all respects perfect, but too heavy for so light a train and road. He (witness) had been a stoker twelve months, and knew nothing of engineering until he became a ser vant of the company. He was in the receipt of 3s. 9d. per day wages from the company. The jury here expressed a wish to view the spot where the occurrence took place, and have explanation given them there. The Coroner assented, and they proceeded to the spot. On their return, Mr. Idatth&w Kirtley stated that he resided at Derby, and was su .iintendent of the locomotive de partment on the Birmingham and Gloucester Rail way. He knew the engine which was driven on Fiday night last by the deceased, She was numbered 37, and , was built by Longbridge and CornpanY, and lit six wheels, with two outside cylinders. Sh e weigh twenty-one tons when in working trim. engine had been at work about four ra° l3 r; It was his duty to examine the engines befo r e they worked on the line, and during the time of their. working. He examined the engine in question,..q_ua. had no fault to find with her. After the accident happened he found the engine on herd oadside ori up-line. He found the connecting-r and the glar ing uninjured. The wheels and axles were perteat and the gauge of the former correct. The road " 5 - light, but he thought there woul d be no danger jl3_ travelling at the rate of thirty-five miles an hour. was decidedly of opinion that the engine in quest! was too heavy for passenger trains, and under that impression he intended to discontinue running with those trains. Relative to the cause of the. 4 dent, he could not account for it except by looklysg, 1 7 0 the whole of the circumstances. The speed Wa Ov a doubt, excessive, the oscillation whilst running r , 10) , a curve must have been great, and the road he Ail sidered was too light for that class of engines.range these circumstances combined would be likelY t l itie at the accident. The sleeper which was 0 11 the a vet/ the time of the accident was certainly riot good one. the i n' Two other witnesses were examined, Iva"' quiry was adjourned till Wednesday next. RAILWAY SHARE IVIARN-- BRISTOL, AUGUST 10. Wager* STOCK EXCHANGE.--The sales arc-Great - d tlet" New, 2th p.-Midland, New, 24 p.-Newcsstle 111 , 1 i 6 0 0 wick, New, 3 3 / 4 p.-South Yorkshire, Doncaster, an -York and Newcastle, Preference, 5 p. • LIVERPOOL, AUGUST 10. ta STOCK EXCHANGE.-There is not any in 3 P l.° " 3- notice in our share market. Prices have stilt a les dovin tendency, and but little business is doing• The ( iOric Arbroath and Forfar, 10s. ex div. - Eastern Count Les Extension), 1 dis.-East Litncashire, New, 156 4/ 7„ -7 and West Yorkshire, ex int.-Ditto, New, 75, --- cos in hp Glasgow and Dumfries, as. 4d. ex int.-Liverpew, lare and Southport, 1 p.-London and North-Western_q."ei Ditto, Quarters (L. and B.), 15 p.-Malton and ...,D r 7 0 13 dis.-Manchester and Leeds, 321. Shares Alate 3 / 4 dis.-Ditto, Fifths (late West Riding Union) , / e te Midland, 401. Shares, 454-Ditto, New Hal 7-C n ntidlo Newcastle and Berwick, New,_ 3% p -Northern Conn Union, 31. 2s. ex int.-North Staffo ' rdshirq , 2 • Dint Union (A), 5/.'ex div.-Ditto ( B), Si. ex div.- - "If - 4 0 100; Hitchen (late C. and 0.), ls. 4%d. ex int.--D,O--roP, Canal and Railway, Pref. Grua., 30s. ex int.-Snr eels few -- Birmingham (A), ls. Id. ex int.-Ditto (B) , 10d. a% w e + , Shropshire Union Railway and Canal, Is. 2 / 2 d• att°lt'd inr South_ Eastern, No. 4, Thirds, 3 / 4 dis.-Whitehaven per ness, 1 4 ex int.-York and Newcastle, Pref. York and North Midland (East and West Riding Egg • sPei 9 3 / 4 p.-Cork and Waterford, Is. 2%d. ex int.-P: 11 1 1 wt., Enniskillen, 4s. ex int.-Killarney Junction , 9 1 / 4 ' MANCHESTER, AUGUST 10. W el ? STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-Birkenhead' shire, and Cheshire Junction, 3% dis.-Blackburn,...l•l°_,,Sadr &c., Preference, DA p.-Bristol and Exeter, 2 cu . ' d We - Lancashire, New, 1 9.16 dis.-Fleetwood, Preston, a° Riding, 1 13-16 dig.-Huddersfield and Manchester,. g, way and Canal, % p.-Lancashire hire and Yorkshire Oa" ) and L.), 14% p.-Ditto, 321. Shares (late Et ensi°l3 l: o ° . dis.-Ditto, Fifths (late West Riding Union) , 1 4 .121 13ir don and North-Western, 170-Ditto (Blanc hester - gear mingham), Quarters (B), 5 p.-Ditto, ditto (C), ,1 3 4 -,cobr chester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire sleffield anu • p shire), 3 7-16 dis.-Newcastle and Berwick, North Staffordshire, 2 1 4 c. p.-Oldham Alliance,lo P• York and North Midland (East and West Riding), LEEDS, AUGUST 10. „ 500 11 4: STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-AmbergaL" plow ham, and Boston, 2.)5. dis.-Eastern Counties ( - fork gel sion), 17s. 6d. dis.-East Lancashire, 30s. dis. (scrip), 3s. 6d. dis.-East and West Yorkshire , 40s. dis. dersfield andXanchester,:lq c. p.-Leeds:and: p r s ; bu bs. ' c. p.-Manchester and Leeds (West Riding uel°l3/', „,.d. -Leeds and Thirsk, 8 dis.-Newcastle and Bwick ,r er 3 1 % p.-North British, Thirds, 225. 6d. p. --Yer • 1-North Stnad shire, 1/. 18s. 9d. p.-North-Western, 4 2 5. dis. North Midland (East and West Riding), 10% P. „ NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE AUGUSTI d Cat• STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are 'N ew castle is.' No rth lisle, 115-Newcastle and Berwick, New, 31 / 2 P.-- Staffordshire, p. • HULL, AUGUST 10. N o tting' STOCK EXCHANGE. -The sales are-Ambergate,,4 Notting ham, and Boston, 225. 6d.-Newcastle and Ber wi ' - ' ' p.-North British, Extension (scrip), Is. 9d. I ) * 29 4 c Bathgate, iiAEilbG STO AirdrieciandExl E N S ß L U Tl ß hous G H, AUGUST 9. x. d.-Ditto, Halves, 14/. 10 . 8 -saAler d sb . ma i te- y h r aAn a d l eFlG-deeellirl:;27lol N u -Caledonian, 34/.-Ditto, ' N x. sw, 1/. 155.-Calecl. $ 491. D mbartonshire, 1/. 11s. 6d.-Clydesdale Junct ie "' der; -Deeside, Si. 55.-Dunblane, Donne, and Calle ° sefr 6d.-Dundee7s. and Arbroath, 39/. ex div.--D it rdif.' No.__ I, 291. 10s. ex div.-Ditto, New, No. 2, 321 * 531. Ditto, New, No. 3, 31. 10s.--Dundee ad Perth , ...OW' Ditto, New, 121. Iss.- Eastern Counties, 19/. lit EA? T i York Extension, 61. 17s 6d.-East of Fife, 11- ,,L.",; - ovi burgh and Bathgate, 10/. 53.-Edinburgh and vwf o b ' exP - A t --Ditto, Halves, 211. IN.-Ditto, Quarters, 161.--9 YIP• ren Leith, and Granton, 191. 2s. 6d.-Ditto, Prefeft. 6(1. -Edinburgh and Northern, 201.-Ditto, New , 21. 1/* -,-Ditto, Newport, 61. 175.-Ditto, ditto, Sr Oft -Edinburgh and Perth (New Co.), 1/. 3s. and Ayrshire, 1201.-Ditto, New Stock, 46/. 65.1 Halves, No. I, 81. 18s.-Ditto, Halves, No. 2 : ', o w so, : c Glasgow, Dumfries, and Carlisle, 81. 9 5 . 39161-4asll e% Dundee Junction, 6d.-Glasgow and IT'arnkirk, d -Glasgow General Terminus, 11/. 155.-Glasg ow nock, 181. 10s.-Ditto, New, 9/. 12s. 6d.--Ditto,lB 81. 2s. 6d.-Glasgow, Kilmarnock , and Ardr ) .1 5813 ., 4 ' -Great North of Scotland, 11. 125.-Newcasue,,,Tedes, ',- wick, 271.,105.-North British, 311. IN.-Ditto, irlTes,6(l.4L -158.-Ditto,Thirds, 2/. 45.-Ditto, Quarters , 5 ‘ Ditto, Quarters New (scrip), 15s. ad.-Ditto, 10s.-Scottish Central, 27L-Scottish Grand Junntleil. 100. -Scottish Midland, 18/.-Stirling and Dunfermline'r,4oo° -Stirling and Midland, 21. 55.-Wishavr and lie, 491.-York and Newcastle, 36/. 155.-Ditto, 1 4. e vi l s cl Ditto, Preference, 11/. 10s. 6d.-Direct Bosh of dras, 28.-East Indian, 4s. 9d.-Great North ° %.41100 2s. 6d.-Great Southern of Madras, Is. and Arcot, ls. 6d. GLASGOW, AUGUST 9. ~, So r t STOCK EXCIIANGE.—The sales are—Edinburgkorot ern, New, 35s.—Edinburgh and Perth, 225. 60:1-- --91 soh, ss. 9d.—Glasgow, Barrhead, and Neilston Direct Glasgow, Kilmarnock, and Ayr (5 per cent- gin COI' Ditto, Halves, No. 2, 11 1 4—Glasgow, Dumfries, uctste4 81. Bs.—Great Southern of Madras, Is. 6c1. -31 totrial Southampton, 15s.—Ditto, New, 19s.—Scottis h York and Newcastle, Preference, 11%. MONEY MARKET.—The premium on Pl. ci t il D t ii r ee sl44 , °l is 10 per mille, which, at the English Nl,l n ' g r i ef ,e,': l 31. 17s. 101 d. per ounce for standard gold, g' ve- r i oat, - f change of 25 40 ; and the exchange at P 1169911030 l'"," at short being 25 321, it follows that gold la, 0 fr: t cent. dearer in Paris than in London. By a ,, d ' i. v i c ble b ( 0 - r Harriburgh the price of gold is 433 per mars , o unc e " the English Mint price of 3/. 17s. 100. Per ° d the e T standard gold, gives an exchange of 13 9; a n 1 39 ' change at Hamburgh on London at short being 13d it follows that gold is 0.34 per cent. dearer ia, so baec, than in Hamburgh. The course of b . ceat' i i at New York on London is 1051 P O 7;0 a li o and the par of exchange between Ent7 t foll ° ' . d, America being 109 23-40 per cent., l'pOallis that the exchange is 3.83 per cent. again st for brio But the quoted exchange at New York being tecl ff at 60 days' sight, the interest must be dedLi c the above difference. ac s , THE LONG VACATlON.—Yesterday the iletober. tion commenced, and will continue to the 24th er .., c ool * with respect to the proceedings in the su per/ 0 ' a d crc There is no vacation in the new county courtsh; : bac i h a f ditors will obtain an additional advantage i v/ cost s :7o their tt hh ee pa ab c rs a et s ine e e s s eoovie.over pleas,t h expedited, el o a nrl long vacation. b v a e c s a a t v i o e n d . co n T s i b d o e r r e ; 1 ito:1 Chic, orde r Coa t oftentimes pleadedin ~,, . 0 , actions liant to 201. can a be d brought, i sno‘v e th x e ce c erte l • (1 0 other than the new county courts. T pli fi l e )i s 'il e ce:ar 'b :t a -;; :l iii t licra: li f) 0 11: triets beyond twenty mils from London, haver;eet tripe, triets fered to them, by an Act of the late Perna to tr 5 , and 11th Victoria, c. 102), the business OtterDeVar acted by the Commissioners of the Insolvent tlP ri Court on circuit. f rdaY 1,4 C ESCAPE OF THREE PRISONERS..—Yesx-..c , t.,-- te j mation was received by the bletropolitan l'encoeleolitioe prisoner named Thomas Davies, alias Eva hi s trio t be to the county gaol Carmarthen, to take F li s ' es iiog ve , horse-stealing, had effected his c2cape l b. t ) ri iiista h V ri le walls of the prison; that a man named • - a . sto ut-- t is in custody for felony, had broken out O' , it cl t t 'iOg prison, in the county of Worcestershire; ; e seaP s be woman named Mary Quin had succeeded '0003;10 from the Wolverhampton police, in whe se c hildr en was was on a charge of felony, taking her three teenti her, and getting clear off. Ar o, co -1 ADVERTISEMENT.] —E EARL OF - ‘ 1 "" Olirava gig b til l ' ct tr ° 18 45. AND HOLLOWAY'S PILLS. —An asstounding cure ' ca s- gj, - .0 medicine, after every other means had failed. Sc e ,„ .t , ee'os . .li;" s it Lordship's letter, dated " Villa Messina, Legl i f,;„i yo lt , i 'the g e t Professor Holloway—Sir : I beg to acquaint you "`, a ch .''' lia , ,ly effected a cure of a disorder in my liver and ytoTotiont,a 0 . .. 11 , eminent of the faculty, at home and all ov,r the of carl o , t' oillg s 0 been able to effect; nay, not eves the waters '''' ri derflP ;Ajoiv''',,,l rienbad. (Signed) " Au% Bottoron." These old ° r ob ' cure any disease of the liver or stomach. —Solo ?, 44 , $t Ointment) at Professor Holloway's Establishnlen,t",orld• by all medicine vendors throughout the civilise, - 00 0 ' spto. O w n er th E e 29th June, Mrs. Price, the lady of George Price, Esq. , c 't Louis '- On the 25th ult., at Gibraltar, the wif e °L o a or s a on so . n. of On John-street,Lesscit•h inst., the wife of John Aberdee lady of c or1: 11 sofe n O cia n opr t : h aE e i ns 6 gL t . h :oi i tf n ha s , t id , ta. a Nu t g. s ,h l ot i nferna.iseon. House, usbirei the llooPe r ' :: 1 1 : cif On the Bth inst., at Liskeard, Cheshire, the , v igtoPt ~.„, cbarlo On the Bth inst , at Lower Tulse-hiII,IVID• Pet er of a daughter. • s tet, D irs. On the 9th inst., at Queen's -road, BaY svi w ife 0f h- the lioully, of a son. , I ,..par t a' f ° On the 9th inst., at Oxford-square, 1.1( it Oa wit J. I', Judd, Esq., of a daughter. A oar., On the 9th inst, in Albion-street, 1-IP -Le"., R. G. Stevens, Esq., of a son. jel -0 0° MARRIED. -,,,,i s ton, i-., o bed i, m 1, 0 1 g n g e ri the dg 7 e , h li i s n q s . ! . ,ofatclSuet.enl‘..lsattrteher'sL, oni-:l_,,?ubteoturiLiairk_bili, d .sL t i t r ig re T .. er of Alexander Curling, Esq, °' Bran of Gilbert f Gilber t A l‘i d u m sg ii r S) °: l it r of B ea E .2 ,..: 1 %, the wif° 1 ...e., ° 11A don, 0 0 n n Et t si li l e . 6 3 tdh iinst., inst. sf ,.a , A t 1 Paris, F r a n t : c o s infantthetw itsfhoceilf:J.olllr,on,,ists, On the Bth inst., in Harley-street , , - (4 3°1 1 grave, on therel i s c i t h o i f a t s li t . e , l a a t t e t h C e . e r-A . .....::::: Ba.,.....tHer...efio:d....:DArucnhdears, M.P.loublon, Esq., and daue John George Hope, aged 4_2 7 ______ a_d London : Printed same Publishes by MURDOstr i ,, ,„ the 11, Sta Printer, at The Sun Oftlec, No. 112. _ e ._;ja";,, Ailir, of the SaYoy, In the County of bilddlesex, IT cul 1847, lif_es____________.,_____.....;:iyt b0:111:70:::; 4 ~i .~ vv lj •1 4 ,