The Sun. — London, England, 1806-07-09 00:00:00

If his, Noble Friend 'had kept the warrant back longer . than was nec ssary for the convenient& of. public buSineSs, he would allow it to be 'censurable, but he contended that the contrary, Was 'the case. Lord ELDON explained. • Lord REPESbALE contended, that there Was an essential difference between the warrant of recall of a Lord Lieutenant of Ireland and of a Governor- General. The former was_ to - have effett only upop the arrival of the new Lord Lieutenant in Ireland, whereas the latter was tolave an immediate effeet. It was' an improvident discretion, therefore, on the part of His Majesty's Ministers, to retain the warrant in trust, and he maintained that it had been kept only With a view to constrain the Court of Dire&ors to choose another Governor-Genera' and Council, The . LORD CH, , NCELLQR left the Woolsack, and expressed his surprise at the violent strain that had been adopted. The former objedion was, that an interregnum existed ; the : present objedion lay against the means that had.beeri.resorted to to pre vent that interregnum.' The constru&ion put upon the Statute by the Noble Lords whb 'supported the Motion, instead of tending to the. security of our distant Government,,:seemed only to perplex men's minds, and was founded on a quibble. The King had 'unquestionably the pOWer of recalling a Governor-General 5 but the appointment N. 4 as vested tor. good purposes; in the Great - Corporation. The warrant of recall was to be Communicated to the Cohrt of Directors in eight days, a'nd .here vas an interregnum without any obje&ion being made to it. The . Dire tors had two months 'to appoint another, a space a interregnum to which no objedion Was Made ; and yet the Government in that case .must be contemplating the event Of -the appointment of a successor.: It was. most desirable thatthe GoVernor going'out should Carry with him .the order for the recall of the:..fornitr one. Ht. had attended to the Noble Viscount throughout, and., thought that he - nibbled at the prerogative giVen to Ibis Majesty by the AEt. In judging of the mean- 7 ing of the Ad,. it ought to be holleEted from • its obVious import, and not by substituting quib bles for the fair construction. of the Aet. . To 'understand the Aet, the Noble and .Learned. Lord' should cOnsider the spirit of it; to look at - the - time when His Majesty got. the prerogative, and at the time when he it: not; to :regard-the Resolution of the House of - Commons upon which it was • founded. It was rather too late to read such Leb tures ill that House. His, Maiesty's advisers were undoubledly responsible • for the exercise of this prerogative ~ as well as -every other. tut it 'did not follow, because they thought fit to advise His Majesty to remove any 'Ocer, suppose to take the seals froth- hirn, that they Ought to lay. the grounds Upon which they ailed before that House, or that the House could 'call for them. Many thing's , -had been-stated in, the course of the ni ., ght.of a dan gerous tendency. In drawing the charader of Sir George Harlow, the Noble Lord hid stated, that he yielded. to Marquis Cornwallis;, but that he might not be so well disposed in the _present instance.-- This went went the length of 'establishing the principle, that. the Governors of distant Provinces might raise s a rebellion if they should not approve of their succes sors. The'clistant P,ossessions were the mortal ,part of every- PoWer ; and in these times, when so many Thrones; and States, and' Powers, had passed,. it Was dangerous to countenance such doEtrines. Cord:-EL,Dots in 'explanation 'stated, that if the cbarge.of askumption of illegal powers was called conundrums and quibbles, he should take an oppor tunity of bringing these great principles . ulider the .F'Dnsideration of the Souse. . Earl AOSSLYN said : a few words against, the- Me llon. ' The several Motions were then negatived without a division. - Earl WESTMORL AND pre.. sented a Petition from the Planters, &c. of the West India Colonies, :against the Slate Carrying Bill, praying to be heard by Coun sel against the Bill. Ordered to lie on the Table, and that*Petitioneri be-heard by Counsel against the Bill on the second reading on Friday, for which day their Lordships were' ordered to be summoned on the Motion of Lord HAWKESBURY. Adjourned'at Half past Ten. HOUSE OF COMMONS. TUESDAY, JULY 'B. Gbrdon's Divorce Bill was committed. Witnesses were examined, and the Report 'received without amendMents. Sir JOnx SP. , ;CLAIit brought tip,a Bill for making a Harbour•at Wicks, in Caithness ; 'a Bill for Build= ing • new Treasury Chanibers in . Edinburgh; a Bill , for Building, a Lunatic Asylum-there; and.a Bill for - Nakina and Repairing &c. in Scot- , .land ; the expences of all 'which were to be dis charged out 4the balances - Of tl:ieforleited Estates in Scotidnd.. Read a first and ordered to be read a Se-' cond time to-morrow. , The Westminster Hall Bill, and the Postage Bill, were read a third.time,and v gassed. 2 . The Malt At Amendment Bill was brought-in, read a first and ordered -to be read a second- time to ' niorrovir. , Sir Joirx Sni s CLAIR brought up the Stage Coach Aas,Amendment Bill. Read a first and ordered to be read a second time on Thursday. • SUPPLIES AND WAYS AND MEAN'S. • • The Report of the Corninittee of Supply relative to the Vote of Credit of 2,400,(Y001.' was brought up. Also the. RePort of the Committee of Ways and Means relative to the 3b Millions out of the surplus of the Conslidated Fund, were brought up, Reso lutions agreed to, and Bills ordered accordingly. The Lottery Bill was read a first, and oraered, tb be read"a second time to-morrow. . The Report of the Committee on the American Timber:Aols was brought up.—Resohations agreed to. A Message from,the Lords announced their assent to the London Port Improvement Bill, and others. • INSOLVENT DEBTORS. The Insolvent Debtors' Bill was committed. In the Committee Mr. KERR proposed, that those per sons who removed themselves by Habeas Corpus from one gaol to 'another should have the-benefit of the A& ; and also, that where ft was provided that the provisions should not, extend to persons re taining 501.. worth of goods liable to be distraiiied , for.rent, the sum, instead, of 501. 'should be 201. These Amendments, were agreed to. .; He then pro posed, that the Debtors should be obliged to give notice to'their several 'Creditors of theitintention to avail themselves of the A&. This was rejeaect—, The Bill then passed the Committee. !Repott to morrow. BiLItKES reported from the. Committee to preparean 2%.nswer to the• Lords 'on the subje& of the . E.aminatiow•of Peers before. the commons.— The Report Was, that. the Commons were.alwaj's anNious to preserve the, privileges of both House,_ but that the power of calling for, and entbrcing, th attendance of Nobl7men, tiOt Peers' of Pariiament,_ was certainly vested in- the House of ,COmmons that the precedent had been established in the case t.f Lord Balcarras ; that Lord Teignmouth was not a Peer of Parliament,- and was therefore liable to be called upon ; and that unless , this privilege was in s;sted upon the 'Commoos would be materially ob struded in oneoof the Most_ important of their func tionsl—This Report - was order to . be. further Consi dered to-morrow. The MASTER .of, the ''Ro.,Ls brought rip the Chancery Solicitors'. Fees Regulation Bill.- 7 11ead first, and ordered to be read a . second ..time to morrow. • On the Motion for the second reading of, the Masters in Chancery Salary Mr. Wm. SMITH. adverted to the Fund out of which those Salaries were paid, which 'was that of Suitors in Chancery, peyhaps, might bz.‘ errs pioyed also for other publie.purposes.. The allow ance th , tk Masters in Chancery wak, c..3rtainly very liberal.. The MASTER of the ROLLS acknowledged this-; and said, that they certainly ought to haVe more than was allowed‘thena in 176.5. „Mr. TY;;WHITT JONES would not oppose the Bill ; but as the sum alluded to, out of wlich such salaries were paid,, was: very large, he thought the names of the persons to whom it belonged should be published., on tke principle of the Unclaimed, Dividends. . The Bill was then read a second time, and or dered to be committed to-morrow., The Accoun tan t-Gen6ral's Clerks' Allowance Bill was read' a second time, arid ordered to be .com ,rnitted to-morrow.. , The Greenwich Hospital Bill,,and the Greenwich Chest Bill ivere read a third time, and., after .Clauses bad been added for, allowing to the Hospital, and CheSt a per centage' on the droits'of the Admiralty; by way Riders, passed. On 'the Motion of Mr. ROB§ON, the . Memorial of. Mr. John Pritchard; presented to the Comrnis 7 sioners of Military ; Inquiry, and laid before the House, was . ordered to be ,prinied: Mr. EELLOWES, with a view to have a watchful eye on the Residence of the CletY, moved; that Copies of the Returns of the Bishops on that subje6t should be prepared, with a, view to their being pre,- sented early the next Session.—Ordered. • Mr. HosHousa brought up the Report of the Committee on the AlesSige. for making provision for the junior Branches of the Royal Family. l\ r. RIDLEY Cora stated, that some of the. Royal Dukes were in possession of Ranger hips and other Oftices of Emolument, and therefore-this allowance to them was certainly extremely liberal. , Lord HENRY PETTY did full justice to the motives of public economy ,'by which hi's Hon. Vri en d w ay aduat&l, but certainly when 'he had. better consi , dered the sUbjea and examined thestatemeht which he (Petty) had made on a form er occasion, he would perceive that this' grant was really nothing more than was necessary, •In addition to ,that, however, it was to be considered that the . claims on. the Civil List had been withdrawn, as also the allowance for - the tables of sorne of the Princes. . „ • Mr. ROSE said that the Noble L era. might have adverted to the precedents of the 1./11:c:; Of Glouces ter 'and Cumberland; and as to tl,t. a:u:',e for RMngerships, we were not ,to cunsit- aO. tits.. in'providing for the Royal it'tn"i. The , Resolutions were . then agreed to, ordered on the first' four, the ,other? being under stood to go again to the Committee of Supply for 'some alterations. Mr. NVlNotipt moved for leave to bring in a Bill' for Regulating the Rankof yolunteer and Yeoinanry Otlicers.—LZve was:gi.ven. The Bankrupt. Laws Ailer.i.dinent Bill was re ported, and ,ordered to be, , read a .third time to niorrow. AMERICAN INTERCOURSE BILL. • ' Lord TESZPLE moved the third reading of the American Intercouru-, Bill. . • . Sir CHAP . LES . PRICE expressed his deCided opposition to the Bill. • He had COnversed with the .must eminent West India Merchants on the busi ness, and was.as much acquainted With the shipping interest cf die Country as any one man in the House, and all we're averse to it. It• would Materially injure. the Canada trade. Such interests certainly deserved- . that an examination shotild have place - up stairs. He regretted t4e'abSerice of the Eight . Hory. Secre 'tary of State (Mr. FoX), who had expressed his dis-, approbation of a ,similar Bill, in 178.5,, and whose sentiments he could not suppose' wer - e . altered now, The American Merehants had' . - stated to him as a , fact, that one-third, perhaps one-half, of the Seamennavigating American Vessels wereßritish subje&s. • Government would have been better employed in examining into this, than' in bringing forward such a measure as the present. He was - well diSspoSecl_to the Executive Government, but could notiabandon the interests of his Constituents. ,He concluded by • moving, that the word " now" be left out; for the purpose ofinserting " this day three months." • Mr. Baobitick opposed the Bill, which, be eon - - ; tended, was unju3t,.urinecessarrandimpOlitic. . . Mr. STURGES •BOURNE adverted to the late bess'of the Session, and the thinness df the House, and insisted • upon the impropriety of gassing a Bill. of such . importance under such circumstances. .Ministets had opposed a delay of four days, that might allow an examination up stairs, and yet the Bill had no* been in the ;House two months. The . .c.bjeet of the Bill was to Suspend the Navigation laws systematically, 'during the War, and the ob jedion to it was that it transferred the power from .thp . Governors - , who mtkst, from their. situation,' be better able to decide on the necessity of the cases, 'tit; .Ministers, who might permit when it was hot necessary; and . ' refuse when it was indispensible. : The Right HonourabjeSecretary over the way (Mr. Windlaarri) had taken upon himself to issue an 'order op • this subjeta, which wa.s• a 'flagrant viola tion of the Navigation Laws, add now; instead of *bringing in a -I3ill to indemnify hiniself, which he ; ought to do,, he w S . bi . 4)orting a till for sanaion,, Ingsnelf violatiees for' the fature., Ti Bill evas • certainly, calculated to diminish the'Shipprng of the Country, end to discoirra4 . e the trade'of our Noi - th American . Colonies. It was calculated to render (this Country dependent on America, which would give the latter Country a great advantage in . cage of 1 a War, for which the .bulk of the popeiatioti of America seemed well disposed. If, however,, he might jo.dge from what appeared in the_ Ministerial Prints, there would be no War while we.had a cdn cession to make ; but of all Moments this': was , the worst for concessible conchided by. declaring; that he would support the Amendrhent.. Mr. MAlilv7V/IRING spoke against the Bill, which would not, he hoped.'be passed 'without any • observations frolu those. Ministers who had ".upon this, and ether important questions, behaved:in such a slovenly, indecorous, and sullen tpanner, as not even to condescend stating to the Hotise the t r easons upon which they aced. Sir ,g 7 7LLIA.III YODZTG nwintained, • that an occasional 'relaxatiop, and particularly in time of War, had been found•materially beneficial to our Commerce, and consequently to our Revenue. deprecated the idea of any egperiment in favour of the . views of mercantile, speculators; which.put to ;risk the lives of six hpndred,thousand persens em ployed iii, theceltivation" of our Colenies., ' , Lord DE BLAQUIERE oppoSed the Bill ; its • 'tendency, if not its obje6.l, he contended to be to make concessions to the Americans, who had lat e ly done every thing buespit in our face: He cautioned theyoung men by who this Bill was introduced;. •not to sport . with those Navigation Law.s„'which had contributed so much to-the establishment, and were - so essential to the maintenance of our maritime. greatness. • Lord TEMPLE argued,. that the necessity for this measure must be • admitted by 'everyman who fully, cOnsidered thee subjed,-end it propOsed to do nothing more than to san6tien, when • necessity forit, that .system for - the future which had' been illegally done forthe last thirteen years. He denied that the parties interested had not been al lowed the fullest opportunity of stating their case to the House : for it must be recolle& - ed,• that , ' they' themselves declined to' be heard by Counsel at the Bar, although the Motion for the purpoise was ori ginally agreed to e = .In answer - -to the assertion, 'that the British Merchants were•quie2 competent to supl , ply our Colonies vial, provisions, he would only ask—how came it that foe, the last thirteen years they had net been able to do so, and that the Colonies were under the • indispensible necessity. of Tesortini ( to America fqr these- articles.? . Ex perience had sufficiently shewn the fallacy of this . assertion. • Lord CISTLEREIGH animadverted upon the 'very extraordinary- •manner" in which this measure ' had been introduced and supported, none of His Majesty's Ministers havi n g. saki -much in support of it. It did not originate with the Minister in whose departinent .such a measure probably lay (Mr. Windham),', nor did the. House hear a word resped ins, it from any .one of His Majesty's confidential advisers but the Secretary of Stale for Foreign Af fairs—the cause of whose absence. on this occasion every man of feeling must deplore ; and he retnem bered - that the remarks of that distinguished. Person were rather' of a Mature to 'aggravate the alarrii which this measure was calculated to . produce. The precedent of the Data/ 'Property ACI, which was quoted by the supporters of this Bill, was not, he contended, at all applicable ; and as to the•capactty of our Shipping to supply the Carrying' Trade be- . tweerrour Coloniei.and America, he felt Persuaded "that.noedeubt could exist upoe the subjed„ ifthose Convoys were granted,which he could appeal 'to the First Lord of the Admiralty, might, in the present circumstances,. be amply affbrded, Without any sa- ; crifice, or even risk of our naval strength. - • If the idea were once adopted which this }Bill conveyed; - the Noble Lord felt that the Colonies would become .more Americarethan English ; for it was in fad di= redly calculated to encourage the Americans,to en tertain the opinion, and to a& .upon it--that., our. Colonies could not subsist without the aid at Athe rice. When such a measure as that befOre,the -Honse was .Coupled.with the Publication out of .doors, called " The Inquiry into the State of the Nation," 'which., was. notoriously Conntenanced by Ministers, lie' could not help feeling the most serious apprehension forthe'ptesperity of the conetry under the direction of such Men. In the Publication al luded to the opinion *as 'Maintained, that this Coun try was no,lon g er_ able to maintain her rank amozeg• , the. Nations of Etirdpe--that she nanst sink to . a se- Andary State—and • that *she Must surrender - het . general maritime and belligerent riglas.. Conneft ing such- a •proieaion with the countenance , it re ceived, the time at Which this Bill was introduced, and alio the doubt expressed, almost in the shape' of an opinion, by the Secretary for. For.' ti Affairs, be confessed himself alarmed for the fete of hiS Coun try.e Ministers applied, in "this instance,' for the blind . eenfidence'of ParliarnenteWithout stating any ground of necessity. They said,' ‘.‘, 'Give us. pOwer -and we will use it." They held the same language relative to the Chelsea .and the Training Bills; indeed, they demanded more than ever the. &dating spirit. of•any GoVernment had attempted to call u: our Parliament for. before. Lord H. PETTY conceived'the greater part of the observations - whical the House had. beard ti-em the Noble Lord who spdke last;. and others on the, same side; quite inapplicable to this sr:l*a, wlt}i -which the general arguments about-tit;; Navigation Law, and. Pamphletse out of doors, had no sort of, connexion. • The only objea.or-thii measure was previously to legalize a course, of, proceeding which heretofore had been 'illegally, pursued. And when Gentlemen called • such a • measure 4-rew and :Anon strous, they appeared to forget their oars, zfe.`ts—bnt particularly to' keep out of vtew the proposition of their friend,-Mr. Pitt, in 1783, which went much further than this Bill ; for that preposition would grant the,free unrestrained commeiee of American Ships with our c'olonies, •and the interchange of all articles of the, growth and manufaclure of . each — and yet this .measure before the House was terneed quite new and extraordinary. The _Noble Lord had heard of an illicit enjoyment, where, according to the Poet— " The glowing guilt exalts the keermielight." But' he had never heard before this night that it would be more• gratetial to pursue a commerce in di reet violatiOn of law, than to give'it ae legal. sanc tion—and that it would be more 'agreeable to the Braish Ship Owners to have , :a power vested in' the • - • • :-:* . . , Cot'er i net s*of the Islt/tlcb abroad ; :who Dii,ght be it; ,fluenced—pho mighvbe_corropted to adopt arrange. ,ments to their prejuldi.c.,thap.to have,the Cfan3• fetred to the Privy COO neil atl ome,towhymthesc.Ship Owners might 'COIII/111.111IC . afC aity `stateinents they might hive • to make, and from whom: they' would be always sure to meet the ftillest attention: Tbat .similar powers of suspending the. laws ) where, ne cessity called for it, was vested by. Pa'rliarnept in the Privy Council, the Noble LOrd sheaved by to the Ads.of the 34th and 2,5 th Of the, F - escittEing, relative to the. case. The JWAS TER of the 'llO LES s a id, that bY the comprehensive energy of.t.'wo short lines of this Bill, it, was. proposed ,to sweep away the whole body of our. Navigation Laws and. Colonial System. . • • Lord H. PETTY explained. The ATTORNEY_ GENERA L ably 1,7:n-dicate . d" the principle of this Bill, and the solicitude of the authors for the maintainance of the Navigation Laws. . . . Mr. PERCIVAL spoke against the Bill. • Mr. W I iVDH.d.iii conceived that it was totally unnecessary that his Majesty's Ministers should rise. seriatim to answer arguments which had hem so, repeatedly advanced and 'overturned. If a ~I3ill of Indemnity, however, had been - „spoken .of, it )Vas not the time to desire that yet—something must b done first, and•when that: tittle did arrive, lie'shbukl hope that the House would indulge him So far - as 'to say, that ; they did not see the necessity' of it until. Earl Camden came forward to ask for his indem nity for having pursued a nearly similar -line 'Of_ coi:Tuft.' '., .. - , • . „ • Mr. Ros'H .again insisted 'that the present In3:* sure would by a gross infta6tion of the: Navigaticii Laws. The question was very generally. ealled tar, and the House divided— For the Third Reading Againstjt - 85 30 55 Majority l . Previous to the passi n g o f th e Bill Mr. PRISEP brought up his promised Clauses, which, zfflcr soave alteration, were adopted, and added by way . of ri,:et to the Bill; after which the Bill passed, and wSs ordered to the Lords. , . , The' Bill for regulating , -th- Rank of 0111 7 4 rs of the Yeonianry and Volunteer Corps was brotiglit in; read a first, and , ordered to be read a 2d time to-morrow. . . Mr. W. SMITH gave notice that he , would, op Friday next, *move .for an Account of ail Onsei held by the different "branches . of the Royal Ita mdity, together with the Salaries arising from e :tcii. . The different Orders on the List . Nc'ent tnron-:11 their regular stages, •and tile House adjoutird at Hal} past Two. From she ,LONDON GAZETTE, fitly 8, 1800: Commission signed 6c the Lord Lieurenont of the Cozoy of • Lave:ion 1/c' steers, Beaumont Leeson, Gent. to be Surgeon, vice Salkelcl,:' lune 7, 1806. ' Commissions,in the Royal South Lincolnshire signed by the Lord Li:unman!. _ _ Ceorge Denshire, Esq. ,tu belVlajor, vice _Hurst, resigned. D.rte;:, dune 10, 1806. IVilliam Esq; Captain, vice I.),nshite, promoted. •DAted June z 6, 1806. Warren Maude, Gent. to L.: Ensign. Ditted June zs, 006. Commissist signed ljv the Lord Lieutenant of tbe County of Kent; Elham Ti -c4 . ofre:dnamy. Elias Lott, Gent: to be Lieutenant, vice Kemp,. deceased. Dated idly 3, ►BO6. yqy 8, 18:6. fsIEINIBEII. RETURNED TQ SERVE IN THIS PRESENT PARLIAMENT. BortouG'H OF- HONITON. The Honourable tkuiustus brOstraw; • • • The Circuits' appointed for the Surniner Assizes, 1.806, areas follow, viz. NORTHERN CIRCUIT. Mr. Baron GRAHAM 11nd Mr. Baron SUTTON. City of,York,. and k.:ounty of. the same Cute.—Saturd a y , July , 19, at the`Guildhall of the said City. Yorkshire—The same Day, at the .Castle of Xork. DUrllarn—:Tuesday, July 29, at the Castle of Durham. • ' Town of Newcastle , ooli- !'yne, and County of the same Towc—Saturday, August 2, at the Guildhalt of the said Towti. . Northumberland—:The same Day,_ at the Castle of N c'.v. castle..upon-Tyne, . 4 Cumberland—Friday, August 8, - at-the'City of . earlislc. Westmorland —Wednesday, August. 13, -at Appleby. Lancashire—Saturday, August 16, at the Castle of Lancaster. • HOME CIRCUIT.. Lard Chief 13'aron'MAeno NA - 1. Atr. justice HEa rh. Hertfurd—Alonday - , July zr, at Hertford. • Essex—Wednesday, 'illy 2.3, at CheimsfOrd. ' - Kent—Mouddy, July zB, at Maidstone. Sussex—STittirday, August 2, at Lewes. surrey—Thursday,, August 7, at, Guildford. 'OXFORD :CIRCUIT.' * • Mr. JUSECe LAWRE'Ner. Mr. Justice LI BI A N C." terkShire—Mon4v, July 2r, at A'.. - .,ingdon. ; • . OxtordShire—Wecitresday,' - ittiqy 23, at Oxford. Worcestershire—Satiirday, July 2.6' at WorceJter. City o 1 Worcester —The srttne Day,. at the City of Worcester. t;ioue.islcrsilitre—CVtduestray; July 30., at 'Gloucester. • • City co,f• (ileucester-,The same Day, - at the - City ,i)f ceste,. 11 , 1oknoutlishire-,Saturdly, Aujst 2:, at Monmouth, • Ilerourdshire —TUeF.day, August 5, atliereford. Shropshire—Saturtlay, - .Augtst 9, at Shrewsbury. .„ Statibrcisbire--cW‘driesJay-, August 13, at Stait7Jld. • BRECON CIRCUIT. The Hon. AaLi Moyszy, Esq, Presteigne—hiotiday, August 11 ).;!,:cOrt':-Saturday; August 46. August A 3; „ • C;IPSTEN. CIRCUIT'. * • R 0•11 ERZ DAL/. fki; Et.q. fanmetsilkni.rox, Escl, Moritgc , inciystufe—',AUpSt 16, Ar. Pool., I.s.4ibigosturcLo.dr,7ust•2..i, at R,..c,Ain. lintshile r -iitigusi at Mold. , CLAire—Scpteiptiet - 3, at the Cas'tle of Chester. • , CARMAWTHENT SUMMER - T CIRCUI, ig,,,6,, • Ciritiartbenshire--Monday, Att4ust a r, at Carinarthe i n. Sturday, August - i 6, at klaverforthvep.- Catiliganshire— f iiday, August 22, at Cardipu.„ -, 14hi1vKR l rFTC,IE ,5* F. ANTLARGED,., - • George. Vaughan the youzzer, tindich‘rood, trevethin, I\lo,,ii3utl2shire, and of ' l l\lesvi,•6l - :i col+lll,, coal-trainer, o iner, frn •i• . 4 i,rO.lLZ , At the Mira . menTay...:ru, ail SaintS:lllner,stol. • • Gec,rge Vaughan Tralethut,-SIOh. Mouthshne.aud cif Nev,surr; - iu the satile'Coulity, miner, twin July 5 toAuAt 23, at ten, at rue ravern, All Saint•*'-lbuy3, 13ristul.- B4NKALIi ) TS chArles Bulling,, of the Kent-toad, St.. Gdzorge the Martyr, Southwark, Surrey, vie,tuai;Tir, to surrender July rI, at one, la, at ten, and Augut at twelve, a t ( . ; k4 i1,1,,,,1 1, Londnn. ..ALtornes-,. Mr. vans Kennington.: Ci t i sss Sufrey. John Hatch, of Axbridge, Somersetshire, grocer, to surc,nder J , lly 24, 25, and August :39, at eleven 4 at the Rufrihier TaVtja, .AU Saii3ts'44,tic a Bristol. tornics, !Sir; -,1)041. I ? . ‘" \