The Sun. — London, England, 1857-07-11 00:00:00

..... / -).-‘,...-4.-2_l 7s . z _____ • • • • c) (v //,,e .------71-7,--------. —________. . NEWSPAPER in the hands of tb-e Adjntar t-General for .44. i, _.r,.. , eo t \ ,. . _ .................... CI NOTICE OF DIVIDEND. . 1 0 0 . L_ AN K 0 F DEPOSIT, ~ . - .., Vrj7 . ' c , 'W7 JO '1 114 .k . \I 0 0 '0.' ‘•= "1 4 , 7 4 ; 5 ;°: 0 e , k""at ~,,. --_ - „yi ' / . ek : • : e a ; Ili it , % \ 7tie kVt-.1?C'5t.,,;%,.. . dietribution. . -,...,,,.. 1-1) 5 ..-- ~:- Z t ~., .r, p..., No. 3, PALL-MALL EAST, LONDON'. i, ;: .. . ~N. ~ ' ---' V ,-`- ' - +-d ......d." 4 ' "..46. 1113 ' S 4 .:' " . . (0 ,• , • ~ `7' ... i .,1 , . a .. ~ Establi.hed A.D. 1844. - 4-4e'- , 'f! ft, , , 19 • `a,• -k. n ..., ~, ~....,„,/rm , ,;....„4„.74t ~ ~-: 4L . ~ 4 , 1 ~, e ,' . __, -- , '....!.. 4 ' a t-o n , r , ' 0 0;7 3 The WARRANTS for the IIALF-YEARLY INTEREST. at Vie '-k ' - * 4O o '.. ) iii: - .44,-4' — ,• - 4 4 .1?•71 - 41;#4,- 4 , N , - a_/.. 1 . , ;. D. . 'a: a, - ',' rate of 5 per ccht. per annum, on Deposit Accounts, to the , Oth June. . '7".. tia. , .. , -_..7 • , 44 , _,.....fir cir , I#//4 '4,,, 4 4 ,. `? .:, ,T , If x 14171 .7*- V:2k , 4\ ~, '4l\l V, ,ti \ i --ws- 0.. .., ~ . • Dry ii .ev 4 - 7" a - 14. 0 ' . '''" 4.4.'" ` ' i ,,,\ ..- -_3_ ;, / 4 - -•a. 1 '4,.. 1 A L .. ,-,-- ..w..., li. will be ready for delivery on end after July the 10th, 1857, and Pay- ------ , at w , ti , i49..,R,-, , 1 0 - 4- - Ron 0. -.,• 4 41? .0-'--. ---:- tx , - ..... 7 -`-.•<„,_- - ,- ,i- ••=', kt* able daily. PETER MORRISON, Managing Director. - - Parties desirous of INVESTING MONEY are requested to ;xemtne the plan of the Bank of Deposit. Prospectuses and Forms for opening Accounts SENT FREE on application. R,. W. S. WOODIN'S OLIO of ODDITIES, with New Costumes and v rious Novelties, Vocal and Cha raeteilsile, EVERY EVENING (Saturday exc e p ted) at Eight. A Morning Performance A Performance every Saturday, at Three. Private Boxes nd Stalla„ may be secured, without - extra charge , a t the Box-office, ;` )1 1' ranhie-hall, King William-street, Charing-cross. Tickets to e had at the principal MusicsellerS. ROYAL .ARGYLL ROOMS.-LAURENT'S C iSIXO, Great Windmill-street, Ilaymarket.—Great see, eess of the Lancers, every evening, with Laurent's Grand Orchestra (A Forty of the first artistes of Lonion. Principal Cornet-a-piston, noulcourt. Doors open at half at eight. commence at nine. The Lane ers Will be danced at half-pa,t ten. Admis don One Shilling. ROY A I,' SUR-REY, GARDEN S.- TO-NIGHT,' Saturday, July 11, The GUIDES' CELE kItATED BIND (by the gracious permission of his majesty the king of the Belgians) will make their tenth appearance. Vocalist, ~.4 e adame GASSIEII. conductor of the Vocal Mus'e, Mr. ALFRED z iELLON. Grand Instrumental and' Vocal Concert. Conductor of the Guides Band, M. RENDER.-Admission, One Shilling. Doors ( , ) ,Den at 4 ; Band, at 5 ; Circus, 7 ; Concert, 8 ; Fireworks , 11. S talin - and Private Boxes may be- secured at Jullien's, Regent street ; and Keith," Frown, and Co.'s, Cheapside. Omnibusles in attendance at the close of 'the perforoa.ace to all parts. The only authorised Program do te had in tr!Gar Children in arms will not be admitted into tha Con wt Robm. TE PEOPLE'S PROTEST AGAINST THE FI MEDICAL SALE ANIY UgE OF FOISONS , IIes for Signa ture at the British College of Health, New. Road, London, and of all t he HYgeian Agents throughout the kingdom. ARE . YOU GOING TO THE HIGHLANDS, unrivalled for scenery, famous in story and song ? If so, blake a note to call at (when in the cspital of the beautiful No th) MACDOUGALL'S WAREHOUSE, High •strcet, Inverness. There only can the varied products of the Highland , natural and industrial, be seen.. In his extensive roams Macdougall has gathered together l a , l t i n t s g le;l:est productions of the 'Highland looms in Tweeds, Tartans, Plaids, Shawls, Dress. s, the favourite Highland Cloak, Flora Macdonald, ditto &c.,&c., with the best native Jewellery Pearls. &c.) ; the pretty products of the Skye, Lewis. and Gairloch Looms and Knitting-neediest the Rome-made, Undyed Plaids of Ord Sutherland, rad Avoch : the Sruff-boxes, Coups, Bickers of the C u ll o d en C arvers , & e . Fide by side with all this he has placed all the necessary Clothing, of every description, for Deer Stalking Grouse Shooting, and for. Tourl•ts, &c. Visitors to his Rooms can at once compare the varied products of the three King acuis.--.13 Macdougall, Inverness. RINCE ALBERT ROAD, Hyde-park.—ln this delightful and desirable neighbourhood are to be LET or BOLD several select and elegantly finished Residences; their architec tural display is of the highest order, and the internal arrangements are everything that can possibly be desired ; in size Ui.y are rutted or the occupancy of both the Nobleman and Gentleman • and the antilY of comfort has been the chief object of the builder. This now lost fashionable part of London renders the locality of these buildings undeniable, being contiguous to Kensington-gardens, with its beautiful walks, end Ilyde-park, with Its rides and dives; added to Which the salubrity of the air of Kensington-gore Is proverbial, and considered by the faculty the most healthful in the vicinity of N metropolis. Apply at the Office, 1, Prince Albert-Road, South 4ensington. SALE OF PROVISIONS, ex., AT GOSPORT. ADMIRALTY, SOMERSET-PLACE, Bth Jnly, 1357. rHE Commissioners for Executing the Office of A Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom of Great Britain &Ad Ireland do hereby give notice, that on FRIDAY, he 31st lust„ at 12 o'clock at noon, the Captain Superintendent will put up to. g a l e, in the Royal Clarence Victualling Yard at Gosport, reveral Lots of Army and Navy Provisions, and Victualling, Cooperage, and Transport Stores, conAsting .of Rice, Oil Cake, Tongues, Salt Meat, Biscuit and Biscuit Bags, Preserved Vegetables, Casks, Staves, Blankets, Bedding, &c , &c., &c., all lying in the said Yard. Persons wishing to view the Lots must apply to the Superintendent for notes of admission for that purpose. YardCatalogues and Conditions of Sale may be had here and at the NOTT.CE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That , WILLIAM JONES, of the King's Arms, in the parish of Ch ristchnrai, in the county of Monmou'h, maltster, hatb, by an I ndenture of Assignment, bearing date the sixth day of July, 1 8 57. ,9•_ ll d made between the said WILLIAM JOKES, of tt e first part, HAKII,IIY, of Newport, in the county of Monmouth, pine erchant, and WILLIAM VirILLT4ISIS, of Tregarne, in the parish or langstone, in the said county of Monmouth, farmer, of the second part, and the several other persons whose names and seals were thereunto subscribed and set, t eing respectively Creditors of the said William Jones of the third part assigned, All his Malt. Beer, Wiliam Trade, and personal Emects, to the said David "MY and Williams, in trust for the equal benefit of such Of the Creditors of the said William Jones as shall assent to and execute the said Indenture of Assignment within three calendar Months duly the date thereof. The said Indenture of Assignment Was, duly executed by the said William Jones on the said 6th any of 4.3-, 1 857, in the presence of, and attested by, Thomas Morgan t , ._ewellin of Newport aforesaid, attorney-at-law, and Thomas John Morgan r ef the same place, attorney's-clerk ; and the same Inden ture Was duly executed by the said David Harrky, on the said 6th day of July, 1857, a n d by th e sa id William Williams on the Bth day• , July, 1857, in the presence of, and attested by, the said Thomas At- Llevvellin and Thames John Morfftn. SOHWEPPE'S MALVERN SELTZER 1 0 WATER, manufactured by J. SCHWEPPE and Co., the sole lessees of the Holy Well, possesses all the.celcbrated properties of t he Nassau S,Dring. SCHWEPI ' EM SODA, MAGNESIA, POTASS' WATERS and LEMONADE, are manufactured as usual. Every Bottle is protected by a Label With their signature. SCH WENT and'CO. ' Man facturers of Soda, Magnesia, and Potass Waters and Lemonade London, Liverpool, Bristol, and Derby. 21 2° MILNER'S HOLDFAST and FIRE RESISTING SAFES (non -conducting and vapourising), rith all the improvemen's, under their Quadruple Patents of 1840-51.54 and 1455, including their Gunpowder Proef Solid Lock and Door (without which no Safe is secure). THE STRONGEST, BEST, AN CHEAPEST SAFEGUARD EXTANT. WI MITERS' (2 I 2&) S AFE WORKS. LIVERPOOL, the most complete and extensive in the world. Show-rooms, 6 and 8, d - street, Liv erpool. LONDON DEPOT, 47A, 111001tGATE STREET, city. Circulars tree by post. NVESTMENTS in BRITISH MINES. Full particulars of the most important Dividend an Progressive +.l2nes will be found in the Fourth Edition of BRIT d IQII MINES CONSIDERED as an INVESTMENT, recently published by J. H. 4 T RC HISON, Esq., F.G.S.. F.S.S. Price 3s. 61., by post, 4s. Murchison also publishes a QUARTERLY REVIEW of MINING, giving the position and prospects of the Mines At the end of each quarter, the Dividends paid, &c. &c. • REVIKW for thp Quarter ending 31st of MARCII, 1857, is /V READY, with a Map of the Alfred and Rosewante mining districts, price Is. :‘ T he book will be found extremely valuable."—Observer. . A valuable little book." —Globe, A valuable guide to investors."—llerapath. 4,A useful li t tl e volume. " —Morn i ng n erald. O f great v a l ue t o cap i ta li st s."—Sunder and Times. "Par ties requiring information on mining investments will find on bet ter and safer instructor then Mr. Murchison."—Leeds Times. One of the most, val•iable mining publications which has come e nder our noti ce, and contains more information than any other on the subject of which it treats."—Derby Telegraph. , To tho e w h o wish to invest capital in British m i nes thi s wor k f the first importance,."—Welshman.' it B This work enables the capitalist to invest on sound principles in truth an excellent guide." —Plymouth Journal. Copies of the above publications can be obtained at Mr. Murchi- S cßfe OlltCes, 117, Bishopsgate-street Within; London; and reliable information and advice will at any time be given to those who may require it. pLAISTOW- AND VICTORIA DOCK MISSION. The Promoters of the above Mission will feel deeply grateful to — al 'Y Clergymen who will kindly advocate the claims of the im wrtant cause they have undertaken, either in the pulpit or among their friends. The Sphere of t in an is in a filthy town lately built and ra- Plaly extending, in an undrained swamp adjoining the Thames, seven feet below high water mark. The poor inhabitants have con tributed most liberally of their penury, and it. is earnestly desired to enlist the Sytwathy of the rich West towards this attempt to raise The spiritual, social, and physical condition of their brethren in this Door and neg'ected district, in the extreme East of London. The 1318110 P is to select the Clergy.. , Particulars of the Mission will thankfully be given (on spelt 'oo by the Rev. R. W. B. Marsh, Incumbent of Plaistow; the two v Alfredtip. Mason, Secretary, Stratford - Treen , E.; or :by An nio Brady, Esq., Treasurer, Maryland-point, Stratford, E. CANCER HOSPITAL, London and West 13 rompton.—Secretary's Office, 167, Piccadilly.—This Institu 'ion has been established exclusively for the treatment of the poor ;filleted vrith cancerous diseases. Out-door patients to attend at 167, ~.I f i on Tuesdays, at 2 o'clock. In-door patients are admitted too rompton Establishment, for one month, and for a longer Period if B recommended by the medical officers. The number of per ;Tim under treatment as in or out-door patients have averaged far n, e )ast three y ears a b out 400 capes each year. Si nce the foundation this R espite' in 1851, 1,799 poor persons, suffering under every e r a ' of this dreadful malady, have received the benefits of this tionritY' A Weekly Board manage Its affairs, and every informa to , Connected with the Institution may be obtained on application this great Secretary. Contributio ns t o e n abl e the Committee to continue _ great work of benevolen ce are u rgen tly s o licited, and may be f. id. to William Loxham Fa rrar , E sq., the T reasurer , 66, Li nco l n ' s - Tat fields; Messrs. Coutts and Co., Strand ; and at the Secretary's Mike 167, Piccadilly. By order. W. J. COCEERILL Secretary. NO MORE PILLS NOR ANY OTHER MEDICINE . L .,, C UES (withcrat Physic) of Indigestion (Dyspepsia), Constipation, „,!• a tulencY. Phlegm, all Nervous, Bilious, and Liver Complaints, .tysteria, Neuralgia, Dysntery, Diarrhoea, Acidity, Palpitation, Heartburn, Headache, Debility, Despondency, Cramps, Spasms, Nausea, and Sickness (during pregnancy or at set), Sinking Fits, Cough, Asthma, Bronchitis, Consumption, also Children's Com plaints, are effected by I U BARRY'S delicious REVALENTA ARA.BICA FOOD, which restores health without purging, I nconvenience, or expense, as it saves fifty times its cost in other remedies. It is, moreover, the best food for infants and invalids generally, as it never turns acid on the weakest stomach, nor inter feres with a good like al diet, but imparts a healthy relish for lunch and dinner, and restores the faculty of digestion, and nervous and Musefilar energy to the mostenfeebled. We extraet.a few out of the many thousand expressions of grati tude frorn invalids - Cure No. 71, of dyspepsia, from the Right Hon. the 'Lord Stuart de. Decies. " I have derived considerable benefit front Du Bairy's Revalenta Arabica Food, and consider it due to 3 ',..'uvenlves and the public to authorise the publication o f these lines. tuart •de Decies." - Cure - No. 49,532. " Fifty years' indescribable ~,_a g cny, from dy*epsia, nervousness, asthma , cough, constipati on , "' lt taebey, spasms, and sickness at the stomach and vomiting, have been removed by Da Barry's excellent Food. Marla Joly, wortham ~, Mg, near Digs, Nortotic."- Cure No. 4 7, 121 . Miss El i zabeth Jacobs, Nazing - 'Vicarage, Waltham Cross, Heels, a cure of extreme ner trousnese, indigestion, gatherings, low spirits, and nervous fancies.— C ore No. 48,314. Miss Elizabeth Yeoman, Clateaere, near Liver Pool ; b i „ cure of ten's dyspepsia, and all the horrors of nervou s Irrita ,P4- Cure No. 18,216, Dr. Andrew lire of constipation , dyspep l.t n ervous irritability. Cure No. 31,210. Dr. Shoreland o fdro p s y debility. Car e No. 36,212. Captain Allan of epileptic fits. Cure No. 4 2,116. Major Edie of enlargement of the liver and to tal Prostration of strength, Cure No: 36,418. Rev. Dr. Minster of ofY of „ e . ra migi, spar rho dpasms,easms, anddebiti ty vomitings, re Cure. No. 26,418. Dr. Har- LCia. Cu No. 39,628. Dr. Wurtzer cons umption. Cure No. 32,883. William Hunts, Esq., barrister , " 0 1, rt.'rlyeip. Cure No. 46,270. Mr. James Roberts, wood merchant, Yeas diseased lungs, sitting of blood, liver derangement, Partial de a f ness. Cure No. 4 ,514. Mr. Samuel Laxton, Leicester, Years' diarrhoea. Cure No. 52,612. The Dowager Countess C ast 4e :lestuart, of many years' nervous irratibility, bile, and Judi- Cure No. 54,812. Miss Virginia Zeguers, cured of con ,7Ption, after her medical advisers had abandoned all hopes of g t"erY• Cure No, 180. " Twenty-five years' nervousness, con _nation, indigestion, and debility; front which I have suffered great misery, and which no medicine could remove or relieve, have been ;; t u _ e NallY cured by Du Barry's Food in a very short tune. W. It. „ e cvos, 181, Fleet-street, London." No. 4,208. "Fight years' (Es ;re, nervousness, debility, with cramps, spasms, and nausea, for my servant had consulted the advice of many, have been ec tually cured by Du Barry's health restoring Food. I shall be a DPY to ans wer an y i nqu i r i es . R e v. John Fi ave ll, Ridlin g ton R ee - Nvite `°r V, Norfolk." • No. 32,836. " Three years' excessive nervousness, Pains in m neck and left arm, and de which Oer, Pa rry's life very miserable, has been general radically b removed by ren- Du g * " .. s health restoring Food. Alex. Stuart, Archdeacon of Ross, kibbereen." Cure No. 3,906. " Thirteen years' cough, indigestion, rd general debility have been removed by Du Barry's excellent evalenta Ara,bica Food. James Porter, Athol-street, Perth." Ire -Portant Caution avdnst the fearful dangers of spurious inaita fations • • v The Vice-Chancellor Sir William Page Wocd granted an injanc ir on the 10th March, 1854, against Alfred Hooper Neville, for I tating " Du Barry's Revalenta Arabica Food." Suitably putted for all climates, and with tull instructions. In eartisters llb 2s 9d ; 21b 4s 6tl; bib lls , 121 b 225. The 1218 car &.age free, on receipt of Post-office order. Barry Dit Barry and 77 , Regent-street. London; Fortnum, Mason, and Co.. pur i.o.,rs to her Majesty, 182, Piccadilly also at 60, Gracechurch "t 331,430, and 451, Strand ; 4, Cheapside ; 49, BiShopsgate altreet 63,180, and 158 Oxford-street, Du BARRY'S CELFBRATED INFANTS _ FOOD, for DELIC iTE INFANTS, CHILDREN, and IN VALIDS: Supersedes the expense and dangers of wet nursing, is more easily d gested, and imparts more healthful nourishment than Milk ; acidity, cramps, bowel complaints, flatulency, cough, restless ness, scrofula, eruptions, are avoided by it, and perfect regularity of the system and sound sleep insured. Many respectable families who have reared and saved delicate Infants by this Focd can be referred to, and a copy of their Testimonials may be had free on forwarding a stamped and addressed envelope to Barry Da Parry and Co., 77, Regent-street, London. Prices: —ln Canisters, Is.; 25.; and 121 b. at 21s. The large Canister will be forwarded free of carriage on receipt of Post Office Order. N and C AP improvedA C f TY d o A D n ON PHYSICA.L DISQUALIFICATIONS, GENERATIVE I,leMnraEprgecirMt(7l96TS TO MARRIAGE. New pages, illustrated by 100 Anatomical Coloured Engra • vings on Steel, just published, price, free by post, Is., rriE SILENT FRIEND : A cr Me 'cal Work on the physical exhaustion and decay of the frame, from the effects of solitary indulgence, infection, and the injurious conse quences from the use of Mercury ; with observations on the obliga tions of marriage, and directions for obviating certain disqualifica tions. By R. and L. Pit RRY and CO., Surgeons. Sold by J. Allen, 20. Warwick-lane, Paternoster-row; Sanger, 160, Oxford-street; and Gordon, 146, Les& nhall-strect, London. The CORDIAL BALM of SYRIACUM is employed in bothsexes to renovate the impaired powers of life. Its action is purelybalsamie; its power in reinvigorating the frame in all cases of nervous and sexual deb i lity, o b s tinate gleets, impotency, barrenness, and debi lities arising from venereal excesses, has been demonstrated by its unvarying success in thousands of easel. Price Its. per bottle, Or four quantities in one for 339 , which saves l Is. - The CONCENTRATED DETERSIVE ESSENCF, an anti-syphi litic remedy, for purifying the system, and is recommended for any of the varied forms of secondary symptoms, such as eruptions on t h e skin, blotches on the head and face, enlargements of the throat, tonsils, and uvula ; threat ned destruction of the nose, palate, &c. Its action is purely detersive. and its beneficial influence on the system is undeniable. Price 1 is. and 335. per bottle, also a saving of 11s. PERRY'S PURIFYING SPECIFIC PILLS constitute an effec tual remedy in either sex for all cases of gonorrhoea, Sleet, stricture, and diseases of the urinary organs. Price 2g. 9d., 6d , an! Ils. per boa. Sold by Daniel Church, 78, Gracechurch-street, City; Bartlett Hooper, 43, King William-street (four doors from London Bridge) ; G. F. Watts, 17, Strand ; W. Sutton and Co., 10. Bow-churchyard; W. Edwards, 67, St. Paul's-churchyard; J. Sanger, 150, Oxford street; Hannay and Dietrichsen. 63. Oxford-street; Butler and Harding, 4, Cheapside ; Prout and Harsant, 229, Stratadi• and all medicine vendors throughout the 'United Kingdom. DIAL PA LI..A.MENT ra. HOUSE. OF LORDS.-(YESTERDAY.) The LORD Cil - ANCELLOB took his seat on the woolsack at five o'clock. Lord LEIGH presented a petition from Birmingham in favour cf the Oaths Bill. Lord WINCHELSEA presented petitions against the bill. - - The Marquis of Lansdowne, Earl . Granvil , , Earl Forteseuß, Earl of Albemarle, and Lord Brougham pre sented petitions in favour of the removal of Jewish Disa bilities. (N 0. 20,2980 PUBLICATIONS. MRS. S. C. HALL'S NEW NOVEL. Now ready, at all the Libraries, in 3 vols. W 0 A N' S S T 0 It Y. By' Mrs. S. C. HALL. Hurst and Blackett, Tublislters, successors to henry Colburn, 13, Great Dlariborough-vrcet. Now ready, is 2 vols., with Forint t, 2lg , A UTOBIOGRAPHY of ELIZABETH DAVIS, A BILAKLAVA NUMB. Edited by JANE WILLIAMS, " An original and interesting work. ilving a sketch of the varied and adventurous life of a very remarkable woman." —San. Hurst and 131acktt, Publishers, 13. Great Marlborough-street. MRS. GORE'S NEW NOVEL, T HE T . WO .ARISTOCRACIES, Is pow ready at all the Libraries, in 3 voli., " Therwo Aristocracies' is by many degre.-s tho best and plea s Antes tof Mrs. Gore's later novels."—Athen um. This latestproduction of Mrs. co•e's pen may vie with the most popular and most brilliant of her works."--John Buil. " A very charming story ' The Two Aristocracies' will increase Mri. Gore's fame."—Observer. Hurst and Blackett, T'ubiishers, successors to Henry Colhurn. This Day is published, TTiHE ATHELINGS; or, The Tree Gifts. By MRS. OLIPII ANT. in Three Vols. post Svo, price I/. I Is. 6d. Originally published in " Blackwood's Magazine. William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh and London ; This day, in post Bvo, price 9s. A JULY HOLIDAY in SAXONY, BOHEMIA, and SILESIA. By WALTER WHITE, Author of " A Londoner's Walk to the Land's End." Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly. This day, in crown Bvo., price 6s T UE IRISH SKETCH BOOK. By W. M. TFIACf.ERAT. With Blustration.3. • A cheap Edition. Uniform with Mr. Thaekeray's . Misellaneons • Essiy&" Chapman and Halt, 193, Piccadilly. NEW SERIAL BY THE AUTHOR OF " HARRY LORREQUER." In Monthly Numbers. Just published, Number 1., price Is., of VENPOR T A MAN OF OUR DAY. D II N N; By CHARLES LEVER. With Illustr.tion.g by " PHIZ." Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly, Just published, price 55., the NATIONAL REVIEW. No. IX. CONTENTS: T. Mr. Lever's Novel.. 11. Pecent Researches in Central Africa. 111. London Street Architecture. IV. The Alleged Non-Existence of Shakespeare. V. Critical Theories of Baur, and Others, on the Fourth Gospel. vr. Miss Monte. VII. Lord . Brougham. VIII. The Man hester Exhibition. IX. The University of London and MiddLl-Class Education. X. The New Parliament. XI. Books Of the Quarter suitable for Reading Societies. Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly. FEIST'S RACING RECORD. Edited by ALBERT' FEIST, ditor of the Turf Department of the `• Sunday Times," and Re porter of Sporting Intelligence to the London Daily Papers. The Half-yearly Part, neatly bound in cloth, is now published price One Shilling. In addition to a complete Calendar of SPORT, from the lot of January up to the day of publication, the book has been fully index ed, and contains a summary of the St. Leger Bet- Incr. Lists of Winning Horses, and much information of practical utility to racing men. W. Wright, sporting printer and publisher, Falwood's Rents, 1101- born, London. The Third Edition. Just Published , nrice 55 ., by noel, free, ss. 6d ON TRUE dt FALSE SPERMATORRIPEA, with the View of distinguishing the Imaginary from the Real Sufferers under this disease, and Correcting of wide-spread Errors in relation to their Treatment and Cure. • Translated from the German of Dr. PICKFORD. "Dr. Pickford is known to English readers by hts frequent prat!. :al contributions to German medical literature. , This is the first time, he informs na, that ho has addressed himsel to-the noa-medl tal reader. We trust this may not be the last, if be shall detect any lther equally flagrant evil which it may be in his power to cor rect."—London Medical Gazette. " The tribe of ' Quiet Sympathisers, and 'Medical Friends,' are mercilessly exposed; and if this book •nuld find its way into the hands of those wha suffer from the coin p'aint of which it treats, we are satisfied that many hundreds would be saved much needless suffering of body and mind,•and what is of less importance, though it is that which the quacks most prize— much money......Thls volume is well qualified to put en end to the nripirtcal system of treating Spermatorrheea, and to place the treat ment upon a more rational and physiological basis. It is, therefore, likely to do much good."—Medical Circular. London: H. Ballicre, 219, Regent-street. Tip OR the SEA. SIDE.—TRAVELLING SUITS, with Cap, complete, 2/.lBs. to Three Guineas; the Beaufort Coat, 21. 10s. ; the new summer Trousers, One Guinea ; Baden Waistcoats, Two for One Guinea. EXCELLENCE WITH ECONOMY. GEORGE HOBSON, 57, Lombard-streot. ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF ENGLAND.-SALISBITRY, 1857. PSOGRAMME. TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY, JruT 21, and 22. The Implement Yard open from Ten o'clock in the morning till Six o'clock in the evening, on Tussday; and from seven o'clock in the morning till Six o'clock in the evening, on Wednesday ; at an admission charge of 2s 6d. for each person. Machinery will be ex hibited at work on each of those days, at the following hours, or at such other hours as the Stewards may determine: — I. WORKED BY STEAM, OR OTEIER (THAN HAND) POWER. Thrashing Nf achine5.............. From EleVen till One o'clock. Tile and Brick Machine 5.......... From Twelve till Two o'clock. Saw and other Mills ........ From One till Three o'clock. Chaff engines.. . • . 11. WORKED BY P AND POWER. _ _ From Eleven till One o'clock. From Twelve till Two o'clock. .• • . • • From Two till Four o'clock. From Two till Four o'clock. Chaff-critters • Tile•machine ...... • . MiU5....... Turnip-cal ters ...... Oilcake-breakers . Winnowlmr-machines, barley-hum mellers, &e. prom wo till Four • o'clock. Miscellaneous ................ From Two till Four o'clock. WEDNESDAY, 22. The jadges to inspect the live stock and farm-poultry, and to award the prizes. Public tr als of the steam cultivators, on land 'in the neighbour hood of the city, euring such hours as the Stewards may determine. At One o'clock (or as soon after as all the Judges shall have de livered in their awards, of which notice will be given) the public to be admitted into the cattle-yard and to the exhibit on of farm poul try, on the payment of ss. each person, at the special entrance ; Members of Council and Governors of the Society being admitted by tickets to be purchased at the Finance Department of the Society at the show-yard. At Eight o'clock in the evening the cattle and poultry yards will be closed. Dinner in the Council Chamber, at Six o'clock in the evening. THURSDAY, 23. The general. how-yard of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs, farm-poulry, and imp'esnents open to the public from Six o'clock in the morning till Six in the evening; admission, 2s. 6d. each person. Public trials of the steam cultivators, on land in the neighbour hood of the city, during such hours as the stewards may deter mks. FRTDAY, 24. The general show-yard open to the public fr m Six o'clock in the morning till Six in the evening; admission Is. eaeh person. Public trials of the steam cultivators, on land in the neighbour hood of the city, during such hours as the Stewards may determine. General Meeting of the Members, in the Conned Chamber, at Ten o'cl ck in tha foreno n. Flasinco.—The Right Hon. Sidney Herbert, M.P., has placed his home-farm, at Wilton, mar Salisbury, at the disposal of the Society, for the inspection of the members*, on Tuesday, the 21st of July, at Twelve o'clock; and Mr. stephen Mills, of Elston House, twelve miles from Salisbury, has expressed his willingness to receive such of the members at an inspection of his farms, and to explain to them personally the system of Wiltsh re light-land farming, as may be furnished with tickets from the Secretary of the Society. laatoanoti.—M essrs. Rawlence and F quarey have made arrange ments for the inspection of their water-meadows, near Salisbury, by the members of the Society, on Tuesday, the 21st ofJuly, at Twelve o'clock; and for the reading or a paper on their construction and management, by Mr. Squarey, la the Council Chamber, on the same evening, at E!ght o'clock. LONDON, SA ru 11 DAY G REAT WESTERN RAILWAY.- EXCURSIONS TO THE SEA-SIDE. I?smily Tickets to WEXMOUTH are wytv issued at very Rtduced Fares ; the particulars of which will be given on application at the I add ngton Station, or at the Company's offices. A WIDOW LADY, agel 49, is desirous 'of engaging herself as Companion to a Lady, or as Muse keeper to a Gentleman, or to superintend the bringing up of Two or Three Young Children. A cotniortab!e home is the Adverlser's primary object.—Address 8.Y., Messrs. Mann, 39, Cornhill, E.C. rrHE RHINE AND GERMANY.—The Ehortest and Cheapest Route. via, Ron, rdam, to the Rhine and Germany, is by THE Durcii R tENISII RAILWAY. Through Laing, in conjunction with those of the e,ologne-Minden Company, stint three times a day. • Fifty pounds of L uggage allowed free for 'each passenger. _ . Further particulars brwarded, post free, on applicalion to the ;:lompany's London Agent, Mr. JOHN C. JANSON, GI, Gracechureti street. • OATHS BILL. rl GRANVILLE, beforumoving the second read inFf) - tEraili - 778 - ved thl7lll . 6'"baths of abjuration - now taken by their lordships should be read by the clerk of the house. Mr. EDMONDS, the Clerk of the House, then read the oath of abjuration. Earl GRANVILLE then moved the second read ing of the bill, and said it devolved upon him to dis charge a duty which be felt was one of great difficulty. He was afraid he should be accused of presump tion in re-introducing a subject on which an opi nion had been so recently pronounced. The object of the bill was to amend the oaths now required to be taken— oaths which all their lordships hail taken, and which bad just been read by the clerk—oaths which he believed to be incongruous and anomalous. It was proposed by the present measure to simplify and amend those oaths. He believed it was impossible to avoid coming to any other conclusion than that their lordships at present took an unnecessary oath, and thereby com mitted a most serious offence by taking the name of God in vain. The oath which it was proposed to abolish was that in which they swore to protect the Crown from a family which all knew no longer eXsted. (Hear.) That was a vain oath, and therefore ought not to be taken.- There was no doubt a eellateral advantage to be obtained by the proposed measure, namely, the admission of Jews to Parliament, which they had hitherto been deprived of owing to their con ecieetious scruples. He did not think it fair or just that they should apply the accidental addition of certain words to the oath to the purpose of excluding the Jews from Parliament. Ho had no hesitation in characterising such a proceeding to be a system of per secution which was intolerable, as it was set against a section of the population which was distinguished for their loyalty to the Sovereign, for their conscien tious adherence to their religic us opinions, and for all the qualifications which constituted good citi zen.. He tailed upon their lordships to sanction this measure on the ground of toleration, on the ground of right, because he believed it contrary to the Constitu tion to (solnde persons from the exercise of their civil rights on account of their religious opinions. He was utterly at a loss to understand why the admission of a few Jews to Parliament, sent there by purely Chris tian constituencies, could in the slightest degree uncbris tianise the Legislature—(hear, hear)—and he there fore trusted that their lordships would not allow themselves to be led away by that specious cry. So far from the admission of the Jews unchris tianising the Legislature, he was quite of the contrary opinion ; he thought it would largely strengthen both its principles and character, by displaying the utmost toleration towards our Jewish brethren. .The noble lord then proceeded to answer the objections that hal been raised against the principle involved in the bill, and warned their lordships against-being moved by a spirit of independence of the other house in voting against this bill. He then referred to the distinguished support which the measure obtained, and (aid he firmly believed that the people of England were in favour of the bill. • If the bill went into committee he woull state the rea sons why he thought it desirable to retain the form of oath now proposed, and the question could then be dis cussed, and any moposal made by noble 1 irds as to further alteration of the oath, would receive the atten tion of their lordships. - It had been stated that their lordships would seize with avidity any attempt to show their independence of the other house, and were able to 'do this with impunity, because the great ma joiity of the House of Commons were not supported by the passionate appeals of the public out of doors. He did not think such a feeling would have any influ ence with their lordships. There were occasions when the House of Peers might interpose between the Com moos and the people by giving Vine for cairn consider ation, which the delay of measures might give au op. portunity fur. In the case of this bill, the cool and deliberate judgment of the people of England was in favour of the measure, and, in support of that opinion, he referred to the great majority of members of the House of Commons recently returned to Pailiament, who had voted in favour of the bill, and which included two of the most able friends of the noble lord (Lord Derb)), who formerly held office in his Government. He concluded by urging upon their lordships to give a second reading to this bill as an act of simple jus tice. The Earl of DERBY said there were two totally diffe rent subj obi before their lordship. The one as to the expediency of admitting members of the Jewish nation into this Christian Legislature; and the other, the alte ration of the oaths which were taken by members of the Legislature. The noble earl who had just spoken alluded to the first as being a merely celiateral advautage, but he (the Earl of Derby) ventured to say that was not the principle upon which the Governmett had considered this bill. (Hear.) They had, no doubt, considered it a primary advantage. He would not follow the noble earl at length into his arguments with regard to the poSition of the Jews. There could be no doubt that, scattered as they were over the whole world by Divine decree, they hoped, at some future day, to recover their nationality. They were a nation within another nation, and in this country they were entrusted will the adminis tration of the laws, but they were refused, in this country to .be makers of the laws. Though amongst us, they were not of us. They bad interests, their greatest principles were &together alien to us. They were aliens in blood, in religion, and in language, Siß had once been said with regard to another class. The arguments upon this subject bad been urged over and over again, and most of their lordship@ were of a mature age and must have come to a conclusion upon this sub• meet. The whole case lay in a nutshell. There was one argumeitt which be was surprised had been again that night introduced--that the denial of certain rights was a remnant of persecution. The noble earl bad omitted to state what were meant by rights. The Jew had no right to claim as a right the power to legislate. That was a privilege and not a right, and bad always been surrounded by conditions. As to the argument about the words "on the true faith of a Christian" not having been intended to apply to the Jews only when these words were first adopted, the Jews were not allowed to be in the country at all. They bad been banished for 250 years before. At that time the Jews were petitioning to be allowed to come into the country, and (therefore it was futile to argue that the words were not intended to exclude persons from Par liament who were not allowed to come into the country. Why, there was overwhelming evidence that the mind and the intention of the legislature was, that no Jew should be allowed to sit in Parlia tent. For many years afterwards they. were treated as aliens, and up to a very recent period it was necessary for a person to sit in Parliament that he should hold a landed qualification, and up to 1846 it was doubtful whether a Jew could hold land at all. Was it wonderful, • then, that no specific clause could be found exeluding the Jew, when by the common law the Jew was excluded from all these privileges. Why, in 1828, when the Test and Corporation Acts were passed, the words "on the true faith of a Christian" were retained avowedly for the perpose . oi excluding Jews, and yet we were to be told that those words, as far as a seat in Pariiament was concerned, were merely an accident. But if it was persecution to say that a man should not sit in Par liament, surely it was persecution to say he should not be Lord Chancellor. If the Jew was entitled to all the rights and privileges of citizens, why should he be ex cluded from the highest offices ? There were other offices from which he ought to be excluded which were not named in the bill. He (Lord Derby) would not feel com fortable in seeing a Jew as Chancellor of the Exchequer .....(laughter)—and yet, under this bill, a Jew might be come a Chancellor of the Exchequer. He might become First Lord of the Treasury, and by this bill ho would be debarred from giving advice to the Crean on the sub ject of Church preferments. In this case s now, if a Jew became -Prime Minister, who was to advise the Crown on these subjects? He would like to know the real hi story o f the clause containing these exclusions. When the bill was in the House of Commons, it was suggestednd penal,ies, ehould be 'i n t ro d uce d, w atthehead of th e G overnment, in his ) h la e i noblesh, and Fa clauses id that this wave not a bill of pains a the Govern ment would oppose such a e, iwhen e,tnt. hl jae tndat way, a t ly h o s r e suggestion, and yet within a week he Caine down and said that Government, on reconsideration, intended to intro duce the clauses. Now, that was playing fast and loose with a great question. His noble friend had asked him what be meant by the term unchristianise the Legislature. Now, he did not know that he had used that expression; but he the tight it was clear what was meant. A strong instance of what was meant occurred some years ago. An appeal was made to the country on behalf of a dee ,. city, and the appeal was addressed to the Christian sym pathy of the country. A well-knOwn'jewish gentleman, Well knownfor his civility, objected to the word Christian EVENING, JULY 11, 1857. because the appeal :vas male as much to Jewish sympathy as to Christian, and the word was s'ruck out. Would not that happen in the Li-ghdlture? ThoJew•would object to the word Christians being used, and that he (the Earl of Derby) would call unchristianibi,g the Legislature. waF s d I that infidels could ent -r the Legislature. So they Could if they forswore them Halve s -, but that the Legisla ture.cnuld not guard against, but it could declare that all who entered the Legislature should do so on a ChriE!- tian declaration. Her Majesty's Government have thought proper to lake a course which mi4ht embariaes many of their lordAips. He so far approved of the biP in so far as it amended the oath. He had been told that a Roman Catholic deputation ha'l waited upon the noble 1-)rd at the head of the Government, requiring him to alter the oath with regard to tho-Roman Ca.tholics. The answer of the noble lord was that he could not do that —ho could not amend the position of the Cath die, but he - did not mind making the Jews' position worse. (Laugl, - Vr.) r , The Duke of NORFOLK—Nothing of the sort. . The Earl of DERBY—At all event's the noble lord declined to accede to the request - of the deputation. The course which the Government bad taken was to attempt to force the House of Lords. Hie noble friend had hoped that no declaration would be me t tle with regard to main taleieg the independence of the House of Lords. Now he (the Earl of Derby) hoped ti-at their lordships would not shrink from maintaining their indePendeece on this occa. sion. No doubt there were occeeions when it was nem.. nary to act in opposition to that which they felt was ab. stractedly right. Teat could only 'be justified when there were formidable dangers to be apprehended, such as in the ea... 6 of the Roman Catholic Relief Bill, or the. • Reform Bill, and he might, perhaps, add the repeal of the corn laws. He believed that upon this subject their lordships' minds were made up, and he trusted that they would reject the compromiseeand contradictions which were contained in this bill. It was on these grounds that he ventured to move that the bill he read a second time that day six menthe. Lord LYNDauRsr said that no one admired more sincerely than hiniself the eloquence of the noble lord. If splendid declamation could settle the question it would have no chance.' But ho had been too long familiar with that house to expect that the question would be settled on such grounds. The oenfidence he felt in the liberality and independence of their lordships, and, above all, in the principle of justice on which the measure was founded, encouraged him to enter freely into the arguments which had been urged against it. As to the facts on which the case de pended, they might be stated in a very few words. Re would go back to the revolution of 1888. That great event caused at the very outset of the reign of King Willirin a change in the eyetem of oaths. An oath o 1 allegiance of a most cumbrous form and an oath of su premacy had been enacted in the reign of James IL The oath of allegiance, which contained for the first time the words, "On the true faith of a Christian," was passed in the reign of James 11., and was in the begin ning of William's reign repealed, and the oath was put in that simple form in which it was handed down to the present time. He then came to the other oath—that of supremacy. That oath had two parts, the one positive and the other 'negative. The first asserted the supre macy of the Crown ; the other denied that any foreign prince or potentate bad any authority within these realms. During the latter part of the reign of William 111. the only oath necessary was the oath of allegiance. In the first year of William the crown was settle by act of Parliament, but it was not thought requisite to take any oath. But in the twelfth year of William, in consequence of the death of Queen Mary and the Duke of Gloucester. a new settlement became neoessary, and the crown was settled in the House of Hanover. No oath however, was even then thought necessary, except the oath of allegiance and the negative part of the oath. of supremacy. In the last year of William, James 11. died, and his son assumed the title of King of England. He was supported by the French monarch. Steps were taken to enforce the elsini, and then it was that the pre sent oath of abjuration was established to prevent the claims upon the Crown efts e descendants of James That oath had come down to ae, but . the cause had ceased, and the simplest plan would seem to be to repeal the oath, and to leave the other two oaths as they stood in the reign of King William. This was the natural course of things, the cause of the oath having passed passed away. By the bill before them, the oath of supre macy and allegiance, as in the reign of William 111. was re-enacted, but an additional clause was introduced confirming the succession to the Crown. Now, if that was not necessary. in the troublesome times of William 111., how could it be necessary in these tranquil times I But, in deference to the opinions of certain persons, this clause had been introduced into the bill. The three oaths were thus amalgamated into one. What possibly objec tion could there be to such a course It was said that they ought to add to the oaths as they existed in : the time of Kirig William. Why, it should be asked ? What were thewords they wished to add ? " Without equivocation,'" and "on the true faith of a Christian." Those words wera'oaceintroducell to meet a tontingency which bat long passed away, as more binding on the Roman Catholics. If they were to be inserted in the bill for that object it had ceased. The Roman Catholics were not obliged to take the oath at all. The words had been deliberately expunged is the reign of King William. It was a folly to talk of inserting words which had now no applicatioh. But it came to this—that the • words were to be inserted for the purpose of excluding • the Jews from Parliament. What was the posi tion of the Jews ? His noble and learned friend said they were aliens. They were not aliens, they never had • been aliens. The Jews that came over in the reign of Chitties 11. were aliens, they were born, abroad, but to say that the Jews of the present day, who were born in England, were aliens, Was contrary to the law At the close of the seventeenth, century, the opinion of the law officers of the Crown, Lord Talbot among them, wa s taken, and it was decided that they were not aliens ; that they might hold lands like any other persons. If these men were to be excluded from the natural right of citi rens, they should introduce a bill expressly for that • purpose. The Jews bad. a right to have their claims examined by the Legislature and by the Crown. This would be the constitutional course. Instead of which it was sought to exclude them by a aide-wind, and that too not of the entire legislature, but by that branch which was not the direct representatives cif the people. This was not a constitutional course. One of our most eminent legal authorities had said that if the Jews were t o be excluded it should not be by a side-wind but by a direct act of Pale liament. He could not make up his mind es to the reasons by which their lordships should put in -these words. They cool I not put them in t o exclude the Catholics or the natural horn subjects of England. They sh o uld ex elude those by a direct art, and if they did otherwise it would be au unconstitutional curse of proceeding. It was said that the Jews had always been exclu ded. Wh y , they were never thought of. The argument came to this, that if they bad been thought of they would have been excluded. In this case the facts were all con elusive against such a supposition. Then a noble friend of his said that, without these words, they would unchristianise the legislature. How unchristianise ? Did the Christianity of the country depend upon an oath I. (Hear, hear.) lie should be glad if his noble friend could have put himself in communication with those great men by whom our Revolution had been effected. What reception would he have met with from Somers, Halifax, ( r the other great men of that day if he had used such an argument 1 They would have turned their backs upon the argumentaridieulous. Did William 111. or his Parliament unchristamise the Lee iedature Was his Parliament lees Christian than the Parliament governed by Beliegbroke—a professed Deee-, ; or than the Parliament of Charles 11. Was the Parliament of James, when theists words were in serted, more Christian than William The words when considered in this light became a mockery. His, noble friend touched upon another point which bad been urge d against the till. He said teat it was inconsistent in a Ceristi n legislature to admit the Jews. Now, this was ono of the great arguments on the other side. A Legislature ought to represent the country. Were there no Jews in•the country ? Were there no subjects of her Majesty ? If this Christian country contained people, what i ncons i s t ency some Jews amongst its was there in the Legislature including Jews in the same proportion ? A representative body ought to embody the constituent body. Were nth the courts of justice Christian ? The municipal cor porations Christian ? Were these less Christian now that Jews were admitted among theta I A Christian court and a Chris Van corporation might be and had been presided over by a geuticman of the Jewish persuasion. If it was a principle that Jews were not to form part of the Christian Legislature, let them see how that prin ciple bad been acted upon. Above Ell things principles should he consistent. What was the course they bad pursued ? They had persisted - in framing a constitution for Canada. Many of the light rev. prelates were pre sent, that had that constitution before them, and framed it according to their own views. Yet it did not exclude the Jews. Was noc the legislation of Canada as Chris tian as our own ? (Hear, hear.) A Peeele of the Jew ish persuasion sat in that legislature, and were among, the most distinguished members of itu body. How were they to reconcile them with the present argument ? But it might be said this was an oversight. Let them then go to Auetralia. Was not Australia Christian ? Were they to value Christianity more in one part of tile empire than another I They had framed a constitution for Ails• tralia—did they there exclude the Jews I He might al lude to New Zealand and the Cape of Good Hope, and elsewhere, where an attempt was made tonclude the Jews. The house had a constant consciousness that they ought not directly to proclaim their principle, so they endeavoured to establish it by a side wind. An argument had been introduced elsewhere by an excellent Irked of his, in the House of Commies, and the proposition was received with cheers. It was this, that the question was one not of religious liberty, but a queston of power. Let them analyse this. ' What was, in this sense, religious liberty ? • It would mean nothing more than religious to leration. Would any due here define religious liberty to be religious toleration I That doatrine had been long et ploded. The doctrine of th'e present day .was, that the opiniOhs of no man, unless they involved dangerous doc trines, ought to exclude him from civil office... A .bill introduced by the learned lord on the w oo l sac k, 'pro claimed by the preamble the principle that no man should be excluded by-his creed from civil employment. The bill was submitted to the law commission of the Crown, which returned it with soine of its provisions altered, but with the preamble unaltered. It.was well known that' Christians were not allowed to hell chines in the Turkish dominions. Ilia noble friend the ambassador at Constantinople remonstrated with tile Turks, and told them that their exclusion was not in conformity with justice, and the Turkish Government yielded. Their conduct had received the full approbation of Par liament. And were they net to act upon the same principle themselves?' If they were to suffer their pre judices and intereets to interfere, they wool I be charged with gross hypocrisy. (Hear.) No one pretended to say that, in Hilt of talent, incormation, cr in other re spects, the gentlemen of the Jewish perisua , ion were not equal to others. We had put them upon their trial. They harl acted as magistrates, as members of muri cipal ceuncils, and the result bad been satisfactory. But he had beard it. often argued, both there and in the other house, horn could a Jew vote on questions religion ? Of course they could not interfere in ques- tions of doctrine. But he would give a more sate' factory answer. Ile remembered when the same argument was raised against the .admission of Roman Catholics to office—it was more Ilausible in that case. He himself had taken part in the discussion, and be remem bered the' impression this argument made on his own mind. It was then said that the Roman Catholics were nroselytia_rs—that they endeavoured to subvert our re ligion—that they were subject to a- foreign p itentate. All these were weighty arguments, but they declared that the great principles of reason and jasties should triumph., They did triumph ; the bill passed ; and all the fears turned out groundless. For the Jews, did they wish to make converts ? Did they not respect our reli gion Were they subjects of a foreign sovereign 1 Ire all these cases it was qii.te the reverse: It was twenty-five )(rrs since a similar measure was introduced, in a speech of great talent, by a learned friend of hi-, of whom he might say, that there never was a more sincere friend of oivil and religious liberty. Since that time, in •successivo Parliaments, the motion had been carried by increasing, majorities. He found in those majorities men of high talent, great learn ing, great philosophers. On the last occasion—at the dissolution—the subject was presented to the different constituencies of the country, and in the metropolis a member of the Jewish faith was returned by a majority above that of -the noble lord who had fought their battle, The noble lord would consider this a mark cf the strength of its cause. On the recent division the majority nearly doubled that of any former occasion. These things were not to be lightly considered. The relative duties.of the two houses were these—the one representing directly, the other circuitously, the people; it was the duty of that house to serve as a check against the rash, unwise, and hasty decisions of the other house, and to give time for consideration, but he had never considered that house should be the continuous barrier against advancing legis lation tleat must lead to a conflict, and in tbat conflict unless they were backed by a great majority of the peo ple they must once more succumb. lie had been for more than 30 years a member of their lordship's house, and had taken an active part in all the measures for the ex:;ension of religious freedom, of some of which he bad been the originator. He was, therefore, justified in the course he was pursuing. Let them not lag behind the other parties in 'the State, but assert their former poei tion, and stand forward, as they had ever done, the bul warks of civil and religious liberty. The Earl WpTCHELSEA gave his most. cordial sup port to the amendment. The Duke of SOMERSET said that all the alarms which had been raised on questions affecting civil and religious liberty had tended to the material prosperity of the country. When the Catholics were emancipated, there was an outcry of this nature, but subsequent events had shown how.tallacious it was. He believed there was as little apprehension with regard to the results of the present bill, the objects of which had been before Parliament for 25 years. The Duke of NORFOLK said that, however the bill might be framed, be considered that it embodied the principle of the admission of Jews-into Parliament. Of that principle he entirely approved, as one of justice and expediency. It was in accordance with the establish ment of that principle that he owed the privilege he possessed of now addressing their lordships. At the same time there were many objections to the bill, which he should seek to remove in committee. Lord DUNGANNON said that if a measure of this sort ever passed, he should suspect that the foundations of the Christian faith would be destroyed. Lord CAMOYS,as a Roman Catholic peer, gave his cordial assent to the bill. Lord DE VESCI thought that the measure could never he productive of any political evil either to the Church or community in general, and he' should there fore support it. He thought that the Christian character of the Legislature must depend not upon any particular form of oath, but upon the Christian profession of the Sovereign, and the other two branches of the Legis lature„ The attempt to mako the legislative assem blies of this country Christian by any particular form of oath, appeared to him to be quite a supeilluous precaution. (Hear, hear.) He should feel bound to vote for the second reading of the bill. Lord St. VINCENT opposed the bill. Lord DUFFFERIN supported it. The Bi-hop of LONDON could not consent to give a silent vote on this question. There was a strong feel ing that the religion of the legislature was involved in this proposal to remove the disabilities of the Jews. For many years past he had paid considerable attention to the subject, but lee was not able to convinc4imself of the force of any argument founded upon that opinion. (Hear.) It had been said that the prayers at the com mencement of the legislative business could not be con tinued if the Jews were to be admitted into Parliament ; but he had not heard that ?fly objections had ever been made by Roman Catholic members to the use of these prayers by those whom they considered to be heretics ; and if that large body of persons did not object to the use of such prayers, what ground was there for supposing that it would be necessary to ab sndon them of the appearance of one or two Jews in Parlia ment. He had seen no reason whatever to suppose that this measure would lead to the michrietianisiog the Le gislature, but it was impossible to epntend that this coun try was now less religious than it was 25 years since, when we commenced to remove the most grievous of the disabilities from the members of the Jewish profession. The simple ground on which he should give his vote in ' favour of the bill was that of justice, and believing that the presence of Jews could not prevent their lordships from expressing their opinion without restraint on Chris tian subjects, he looked upon their admission to one or other of the branches of the Legislature as an act of jus tice. He should vote in favour of the second reading of the hill. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY regretted that he felt compelled to c nue to an opinion directly opposite to that at which his right rev. brother bad arrived with respect to the admission of Jews into the Legislature. There was no vote which he gave with greater reluctance or pain than that which it had been his duty on several occasions to record against the bill for enabling them to take part in the legislation of the country. In coming to this con c l us i on he was actuated by nothing like a spirit ,of persecution, but was influenced only by &strong conviction that a Christian country ought to be governed by a Christian legislature. (Hear.) Entertaining this conscientiois opinion, he should feel it his duty again to reoersi his vote in oppesition to the further progress of the measure. (Hear.) The Eael of ALBERMARLE supported the bill, and instanced the good effect which had resulted in America from its tolerant policy respecting the Jews ; and, among other things, he stated that half of the Jewish popula tion of Bavaria had left that country, and had thus en riched America, and beggared bigotted Bavaria. It soul f be well for this country that it should not be found in company with such a miserable and petty State as Bavaria in our treatment of the Jews.' (Hear.) The Earl of SHAFTESBURY - had al ways been op posed to the admission of Jews into Parliament, and was still of the same opinion ; but could notgive hlsvote against the second reading of a bill which proposed to get rid of such absurd and almost blasphemous oaths as those now required to be oaken by members of Parlia. meet. Feeling, as he did, so strong an opinion on this subject, he would, at all hazards and all risks, vote in favour of the bill, for the purpose of effecting a change in the absurd oaths now required by law to be taken, reserving to himself the right of moving or supporting such amendments in committee as he might think fit, respecting the words which precluded the Jews from holding a seat in Parliament. Lord BROUGHAM contrasted the conduct of the noble lord who had last spoken, in deciding to sup port the second reading of the bill, with that of the noble lord who had moved the amendment, who, holding strong opinions as to the absurdity and outrage on common sense and decorum perpetrated by the misting oath, had still thought fit to give a negative to the whole bill, rather than seek to effect amendments of de tails in committee. What was complained of by those who supported the bill was not that the Jews bad not the right to take part in the Government of the country, but that these persons, being eligible in other respects, were declared upon religious grounds to be ineligible for the offices which they would otherwise have a right to hold. He entertained very strong opinions in favour of this proposal, and he trusted that their lordships would sanc tion the second reading of the bill. It had been said that if the bill were to pass it would un-Christianise the Legislature. If their lordships were to reject this bill, their position would no doubt be a most gracious one; but what would become of their colleagues in legis lation—the House 'of Commons—if this theory were true. They had by a very large majority un-Ch ristianised themselves., and they must be, he did not like to say, the high road to perdition. 'God forbid that he shouldn send anybody on such a course—(a laugh)—but her lordships would still be in a most comfortable and their state if they passed the bill. What because, too, of the great importance attached to the words, Christia nity true faith of a Christian," as a bu lwark to the of the country, when it was a fact that Roman Ca tholic peers and members of Parliament were not called upon to state in their oaths that they were either Catho lic or Christian. (A laugh.) The omission of the words, "on the true faith of a Christian," in the early history of the oath, furnished strong evidence that there was no intention to exclude the Jew, and this point the noble earl who seconded the amendment had entirely omitted to notice in one of the most judicious—(a laugh)—and skilful speeches which he (Lord _prougham) had ever heard in that house, and the effect of which he greatly feared would be severely felt in the division en the bill. But the Legislature of the country wag not more Chris tian than it was .b Protestant, but the Legislature had de citled on admitting Catholics to a share, and in the face of this it was still contended that the constitution and Legislature of the country were Protestant. (gear.) The sacr ttnental test had been defended with as much ar dour as the present form of words, but before the last act was repealed the custom of taking part in that most 1 , 0- !emu of all the ceremonies of a Christian Church bad so far degenerated that on one occasion an aged peer, when appointed to an ffice in the king's household, was told be must qualify for the office by taking the sacrament. The nol.le peer went to a place of worship, and when asked afterwards how he had got through the ceremony, it was found that he had been present, not knowing the differecc-., at the churching of a woman, and had not recived the sacrament at all. (Laughter.) The reason of the exc!usian of the Jews from the legislature had not arisen from any demerits of their own, but simply from the smallness of their numbers. Tne Bishop of OXFORD said the noble and learned lord had striven with his great powers as an advocate to impress upon their lordehips that they were discussing the oath of abjuration, and not the admission of the Jews to the eleeture. (Hear, hear, hear.) Tne noble and learneXTOrd endeavoured to put them on a wrong scent He bad told them that the game was in one directerm, when their lordships had seen it break cover in another. (Cheers.) It had been suggested that the omitted words might be put into this bill, but was not that a transparent trap, because, if the bill were so amended an sent back to the Commons, there the words would be again struck out and the bill would be brought back to the house at such a late period of the session that it would pa.s without the proposed words. As to elee question eef right with regard to the admission of persons to the legislature, why did they exclude mem bers of their own church and the priests of the Roman . Catholic Church ? The fact was that this was no sight, it was a trust that was given to a man for the benefit of the Stag, and tt ereforo upon that trust certain condi tions w,re properly imposed. If they admi,ted the Jew to Parliament, how c ei:el they appeal t) a Christian principle when that one man might say such a prin ciple cannot apply to me. It was once said that the Legislature f this country was a Protestant Legisla ture. Could any one say that it was a Protestant Legis let are now ? No, they could not. Admit the Jew, and they could not refuse to admit the Mormon, the Hindoo, or the Mahomedan. They were now asked to.admit, under an artifice; a pestilent imposture. A conscientious Jew would administer honestly Christian laws ; but a conscientious Jew would not honestly make Christian laws ; and there was the great distinction which existed between allowing the Jew to make the laws, and allow ing him to administer the.lews. It was impossible that the Christian and the Jew could combine in honest action. And therefore it was that he dared to face the charge of intolerance, for be believed that they could not, as a Christian people, allow those who denied Christ to make their Christian laws. e The Duke of ARGYLL denied that the Government had raised a -false issue on the subject ; for they had three. or four times introduced a bill going directly to allow the Jews to be admitted to Parliament. In that they had been unsuccessful, and therefore they were fully justified in endeavouring to accomplish that object under another form. The Government did not deny that one of the main objects of the bill was the admission of the Jews, and they had endeavoured to meet that ob ject in the best way consistent with the consciences of all. It was quite impossible ever to get an amendment of the oath if the words " On the true faith of a Chris tian," were retained. Thee House of Commons would never sanction such an amendment. The accusation of the nob'e earl opposite (Lord Derby), that the noble lord at the head of the Government was playing fast and loose with this matter, came with a wry bad grace from the noble earl, who had played fast and loose with a vital principle—not upon an Act of Parliament involv iog no principle, but a vital principle—when he was at tempting to form a Cabinet. The right rev. prelate who had just sat down had talked about admitting the Mor mons. Why, according to the oath as it now stood Brigham Young could enter Parliament without the slightest obstruction. The Earl of GALLOWAY said he considered the bill amounted to a total abjuration of the principles of Christianity, and it was nothing to tell him that Unitarians and others obtained admission to Parlia ment, because they did it on their own respsnsibility. The house then div ided— Conteuts—Present... Proxies... Non-Contents—Present .:.. Proxies . • 91 . 48 -139 . 109 64 -173 34 Majority against the bill POLICE (SCOTLAND) BILL. This bill was read a third time and passed. The house adjourned at a quarter to twelve. HOUSE OF ,COMMONS.—(YEsTERDAY.) The SPEAKER took the chair at 4 o'clock. FRANKLIN EXPEDITION. Mr. HORSFALL moved for an address for copies of memorials and addresses relating to the Franklin Expe dition which have been recently transmitted to the Go vernment, or to the First Lord of the Treasury, from the merchants of New York, the Royal Irish Academy, the Royal Dublin Society, and other public bodies.— Agreed to. IRISH MILITIA REGIMENTS. Lord C. HAMILTON asked the Under Secretary for War if he could state to the house whether it was intended to call out the Irish militia regiments for train ing during the en , uing autumn! Sir J, Itc\.MSDEN said it was not the intention of the Government to call out any regiment of the Irish militia this year. The rule it was intended to follow was not to call out any of the regiments embodied during the late war. [ c uo 4D. STAMPED 5v .] INDIA. Mr. NOEL asked the Under Secretary for War whether the Government would give to those of her Majesty's Officers who were ordered to rejoin their regi ments in India before the expiration of their leave, on account of the mutiny in that country, a free passage, or whether they would be compelled to return there at their own .'xpense? Sir J. R.A.SISDEisT said that the subject was at pre sent under the consideration of the 'War Office and the India Board. He was unable then to give an answer to the question. PROBATES, etc, BILL. Sir J. TROLLOPE asked the Attorney-General, if after calm reflection, he intended to proceed with the probates and letters of administration hilt; The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that the ques tion did not require calm consideration, and he thought it was answered by the paper containing the order for to-night. (Hear, hear.) It was proverbial that the House of Commons was not obstinate, and he thought they would not obstinately adhere to the deci eion come to on a former night with reference to the bill. (Laughter.) CHINA. Sir J. PAKTNGTON asked the First Lord of the Treasury the foao wing questions, let, Whether any recent intelligene? had been received as to the position and proceedings of her Majesty's forces ? 2dly, Whether her Majesty's Government had sent out any instructions, empowering the Indian Government to divert from their destination the troops which had been sent from this country to China, and employ them in India? 3 ny, If no ouch instructions had been sent, whether it were true that the Governor-Gene ral of India had, of his own authority, acting under the pressure of events in that country, sent orders to Ceylon that the forces sent from this country to China, were, on their arrival at Ceylon, to proceed to India ? And, fourthly, whether her Majesty's Government were prepared to state, in the event of its being intended that the troops sent to China should be immediately em ployed in India, what course they proposed to take for strengthening the British Forces in China ? Sir C. WOOD, in the absence of the First Lord of the Treasury, said that when the last advices left China on 10th May, things remained very much in the same state, no further hostilities having taken place. The rig ht lion:baronet, who was exceedingly indistinct, was un derstood to answer the other questions in the negative. SUPPLY. Sir IT. WILLOUGHBY asked what branch of the estimates it was intended to take in committee of s upply I on Monday night, and when No. 7, miscellaneous esti mates would be placed on' the table of the house Th e CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQTJER said he would answer the question before the rising of the house. DIVORCE, Bcc., BILL. Mr. HENLEY aske d if it was the intention of the Government to proceed with the divorce, &c., bill on Monday ? Certainly Sir C. WOOD OF not on Monday night. TRANSMISSION OF TROOPS TO INDIA. On the motion for the adjournment of the house till Monday, Captain VIVIAN asked the President of the Board of Contra whether it was the intention of her Majesty's Government to send the troops which were about to embark for India in sailing ships? Mr. V. SMITH said that arrangements were made behoe the diewtron3 news was received from India for sending out 10,000 troops to India for the purposes of relief in sailing vessels. They would proceed this month to their destination. When the news arrived from India, the East India Company applied to the Government 4,000 additional troops, awl it had been arranged to send 2,000 of them out in screw vessels, and 2,000 in sailing vessels. Sir C. NAPIER regretted the Government bad sent any of the troops by sailing vessels to India. The subject then dropped. DISTRIBUTION OF MEDALS. Colonel NORTH asked the Under Secretary of War when the Turkish Order of the Medjidi, the Sardinia n Military Medal, and the Turkish Medal for officers and men are to be distributed to those entitled to them Sir J. RAMSDEN said that the Government of this country had dune all that was required of them in rela tion to the Turkish Order, The Sard inian medals were _ . . S', W. CODRINGTON exprserierl regret v In - refeereece to 'diatribe lion of these TIIE RUgeSLIN TARIFF. th e U : u r„ la J r . d l o .. f R T l ra C d N e ß w ir e h a e - r k;cl he th G e o , :te n e m P en rie , t d nyp n ! knowledge of the details of the revised tariff of Russia, and, if so, whether they would lay them upon the table of the house Air. LOWE said, t6,t he had received some account of the change alluded toi , bot. it was in too imperfect a state tai lay on the table of the house. As pion as he received fill information oti the question ho would lay it onithe table of the house. NEWSPAPER SECURITIES. Mr. AYRTON asked whether it was the intention of Government to continue the prosecution of the publisher of the Bury Times. and to abstain from prosecuting the publisher of the Free Press, and all other newspapers and pamphlets published without compliance with the statutes relating to security and registration The CHANCELLOR. of tbo EXCHEQUER, said that the Government intended to proceed with the pro secution of the Bury Times, and that they would pro ceed in a similar manner against all newspapers that did not comply with the statutory enactments rospecting security and registration of newspapers. The Free Press alluded to was not considered to be a ne vspaper, and na prcceedincs would b e taken against it. COLONIAL LABOUR. Mr- TURNER asked the First Lord of the Treasury, whether any communication had taken place between the English and French Governments respectin g the ex ports of negroes from the West Coast of Africt, to the French Colonies in the West Indies ; and whether he was aware in what manner the negroes were to be ob tained • --- Sur E. BUXTON called the attention of the Govern ment to the emigration of negroes to the Die of Bourbon. Lord PALMERSTO.N said that the Government were aware of the French Government being engaged in transporting negroes from the West Coast of Africa to the French c denies, and confidential communication had been made to the French Government relative to the matter. The French Government bad assured her Ma jesty's Government that it was their anxious desire that the arrangements they had made for procuring negro labour should not lead to the revival of tl. e slave trade—indeed that every precaution bad been taken to prevent it. It would be the duty of her Majesty's Govern meat to obtain all the information they could, and if neces sary, call the attention of the French Government to any I:ifeach of the regulations laid down by them in reference to the emigration of free negroes. The free niTroes of Africa wereaverse to emigrating, and he thought theFreneh Government would have some difficulty in obtaining really free. emigrants. He could not believe that the French Government, having abolished the slave-trade, would do anything that would lead to its revival. In re ply to Sir E. Buxton, the nobls lord said that her Ma-. jesty's Government had received information, though not authentic, of the emigration of negroes from the east coast of Africa to the Isle of Bourbon, but he was not in a poeitien to state the extent to which it had gone or in what manner the negroes bad been obtained. The motion for adjournment was then agreed to. PROBATE AND LETTERS OF ADMINISTRA- TION OF WILLS BILL. The house went into committee on this bill. Toe ATTORNEY•GENERAL adverted to the de feat the Government had sustained the other night, when the committee, in opposition to his wish, carried an amendment empowering personal property of all kinds to be dealt with in the country districts. That arrangement, he believed, would open the way to much fraud, and therefore he could not give his eanctim to it. But he would propose this compromise; let the committee negative the clause as it at present stood, on the under• standing that he would afterwards bring up a clause giving the district courts power to deal with willi to the extent of 3,0001., but excluding property in the funds, railway shares, &c. If the house agreed to the principle of this clause he would not resist going to a still further extent, though he thought that was as far as they could go with propriety. Mr. WESTHEA.D, as the mover of the Beccessful amendment, would not object to the principle, but it was preposterous to talk of 3,0001. as the limit. He quoted from a list of the wills proved at York, from which it appeared that 200 wills, where the personal pro perty was sworn under 10,0001. had been proved within the last five years. For himself, he could not see where there was more chance of fraud in the country than in London. Sir J. TROLLOPE objected to the compromi , e. The committee on the last occasion affirmed a principle and not a detail. The principle was that people in this coun try should be allowed to transact their business with the persons in whom they bai confidence, and not concen trate all business in London. IF the Attorney-Ger;erai's principle were agreed to, it would become a most expen sive measure for the country. He would resist the pro. po:itionto negative the clause as it stood. Mr. WALPOLE thought all the arguments against wills above 3,0001. being proved in the country were equally valid against wills of 7001. being so proved. What he recommended was, to fix no limit to the per sonalty, but to provide for all funded, joint-stock, and railway property being 'proved in London. Mr. ELLICE also strongly condemned the idea of a limit. Mr. MA.LINS, on the other hand, strongly objected to the principle that one probate should not cover all descriptions of property, and that a district registrar whose decision should not be conclusive in a case of 3,0001., was not to be allowed to deal with 1001. in the Three per Cents. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said he must adhere to his intention to negative the clause as it stood, bat he intimated that if the house yielded to his wishes in this respect he would bring up a clause removing all limit to personal property that was not comprised in funded property, railway shares, &c. Lord PALMEnsr 6 N,immediately following the Attorney-General, agreed with him in the view he took ; but, holding that opinion, he did not Eee that there wa4 any need to negative the clause. The clause was then, amid loud ol;eers, --- ordered to stand part of the bill. Mr. MALINS bad some clauses to propose giving - compensation to proctors for the business of which the bill would deprive them, but he intimated that as the decision to which the house bad just come would con siderably affect the question by depriving the proctors of sti I more business, he would postpone his clauses till he saw how this question of district courts was finally settled. _ _ _ The ATTORNEY•GENEPAL intimated that what ever compensation might be awarded under this bill would be paid out of the Fee Fund, and not out of the public exchequer. Several divisions took place with respect to the sche dules, between the claims of different towns to be the places of registration, but the towns as named in the bill were in all cases unaltered. The house then resumed. The Crown, &c., Suits (Scotland) Bill and the Bank ruptcy and Real Securities (Scotland) Bill were read a third time and passed. Other bills were advanced a stage. On the order for going into committee upon the Elec tion Petitions Bill, Sir G. GREY objected to eiscussing the details of such a measure at that late hour. Mr. ADDERLEY complained bittetly of the ob stacles to the progress of the bill. _ _ _ After some further discussion the house divided upon a motion by Mr. AYRTON for an adjournment, which was carried by 95 to 25. The house adjourned at a quarter past 1 o'clock. The total amount of gold purchased by the Bank on Wednesday is understood to have reached 100,0001. IRONMA , TERS' QUARTERLY MEETING.—BIRMINGHAM, July 9.—There was a full attenlance of the ironmasters at the meeting held in the town hall here this afternoon. The hot weather a fortnight since somewhat checked the consumption of pig iron, still the stooks are comparatively trifling. An attempt was made to-day to obtain an advance of half a crown a ton, but this was not conceded ; there were, however, many seise of good mine pigs at 41. 2-3. 6d. per ton. Stone a shade iu advance of yes. terday's quotations. [ADVERTISEMENT.]—HoIIo way's Pills.—A sovereign remedy for all all complaints originating in the internal organs, producing the most astonishing results; and all who are liable to attacks of indigestion should fortify their system against the relaxing heats of summer by this mild aperient and alterative in the spring. It re moves all obstructions in the stomach, and re-vitalises the digestive powers, when weakened by indulgence or rendered torpid by a sedentary life ; the testimony of invalids in all parts of-the world demonstrates the heal ing poker of this potent remedy.—Sold by 8 11 medi cine venders throughout the world ; at Professor Hol loway's Establishments, 244, Strand, London. and 80, Maiden-lane, New York ; by A. Stampa, C .nstanti neple ; A. Guidicy, Smyrna ; and E. Muir, Malta. I A ref KRTlFfit?d stir. j— SPORTSM EN AND G ENTLEMEN OF TAD anal" AND NAVY. —S. and l Soletueus, opticians, 39, Albe marle-street,Observe—oppositeiui groat pow e: the Field, in Y a o r t l et s_t i r p ee o t r , ta P i i , e n ciatyd,i leombined l Racecourse. Opera, and general out-door day and night powerful waistcoat pocket Perspective Glasses, weighing only four ounces, each containing 12 and 18 lenses, con structed of German glass, will show distinctly a person's countenance two and a half and three miles. They serve every purpose on the race-course, and at "the opera houses, country scenery; and ships arc clearly seen at 8 to 10 miles. Taey are a'so invaluable for shooting, doer-stalking, and yachting. Single ones, the size of a walnut, possessing the same great power. Her Majesty's Coast-Guards aro making. use of them as day and night glasses, in genera. use by gen tlemen, of the Army and Navy, and by sportsmen, gentlemen, gamekeepers, and tourists. The most powerful and brilliant some telescopes, possessing such extraordinary power that ,jeco , three and a-half inches, with an extra astronomical I s eYe n - d the will show distinctly Jupiter's moon's. Saturn's a.ting,: double stars ; with the same tdescope ten be see d an ob'ect, person s countenance three•and-a-half miles distant -"and _ from 14 to 16 miles. All the above can be had t eel and Will are secured bY all sizes, with increasing powers, Her Majesty's Royal Letters Patentar. Newly-invented Spe ctacle Lenses of the gnavest tis cut power. his invention le 14111- able advantage derived from tkened , is, that vision becomes preserved and strg at very t. agei persons ar enabled to einploY their sight h mos minute oec u pation— can sea with these lensetli o a nate magnif)iug power — an d they do not require the frequent changes to the dang erous effects of further powerful as s i s t ance , Persons can 'be suited at the mo .remote pa r t o f th e wor ld by send in; on e of the glasses out ut their spectacles in a letter, and stating the dist ince from the eye they can read small. print with it, and those who have not made use of spectacles by e ta , fug their ago. Deafness.—A newly-invented instrument for extreme cases of deafness. called the Sound ,Magnifier, Organic Vibrator„ and invisible Voice Conductor. It fits so into the ear as not to be in the least perceptible ; the nut lea sant sensation of singing noises in the head is entirAy IC mo mi. It affords instant relief to the deafest persons, and enables them to hear distinctly at church and at public assent -3 i, taotnarle-street,lnceadilly.—Opposite the York Hotel, W. • 4ow Ready, at all the Libraries, in 2 Vols., 215., V•OtHING. N E W. ll' By the Atithbr of" JOHN HALIFAX, GENTLEMAN." "The reader will find these narratives fully ca.cniated to remind him of that truth and energy of humav portraiture, that spell over human affections and emotions which have stamped this author one of the first novelists of our day."—Jahn Bull. A New and Cheaper Edition of " JOHN HALIFAX" is also just pnblishtd, complete in I vol. 10s. 6d. bound. Hurst and Blackett, rnblishers, successors to Henry Colburn.