The Sun. — London, England, 1847-06-21 00:00:00

THE SUN, __LONDON, MONDAY MORNING, JUNE 21, 1847. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, June 18. GAMEY V. ESTHALL. This was an action to recover damages for criminal conversation with the plaintiff's wife. Sir F. THESIGER (with whom were Mr. Cockburn, Q.C., - and Mr. Mellor) said, the action was brought to recover compensation in damages for one of the most severe injuries which it was possible for a man to sustain. The plaintiff was a commercial traveller to a respectable souse in St. Paul's Churchyard; and the defendant was a builder, in an extensive way of business. Though this was not an action which was frequently brought by per sons in that class of life, the injury of which the plaintiff complained was, nevertheless, calculated to wound his feelings as deeply, and entirely to destroy his happiness and peace of mind. Indeed, to a person in the plaintiff's station of life, the society and assistance of a wife was, perhaps, even more essential than to persons who moved in a more exalted station. He was obliged, from the very nature of his business, to be frequently away from home, and thus required, more than most men, the watchful care of a wife for the protection of his home and children. But all this he had been deprived of by the unrestrained conduct of the defendant The plaintiff and his wife were nearly about the same age, and since their marriage they had lived together in a state of the greatest happiness and affection, and had three children born of the marriage. In April, 1846, the de fendant, who, he regretted to say, wax a married man, and the father of two children, came to reside in Beath-- field-house, adjoining the plaintiff's r. sideece in Elk ham-terrace, Islington. The plaintiff and defendant were entire strangers, but while the defendant was ab sent from his home on business, the defendant, in some way or another, introduced himself to the plaintiff's house on several occasions, when circumstances occurred which would leave no doubt whatever on the minds of the jury that a guilty connexion had taken place between them. The Learned Counsel then stated the evidence as it was afterwards given by the witnesses; and called upon the jury to award such an amount of damages as would give to the plaintiff some satisfaction, however insufficient, for the irreparable injury which he had sus tained. Edward Gadsby examined—l am the brother of the plaintiff. My brother is 31 years of age; his wife is 26 They have three children. I always found them living comfortably and affectionately together. My brother is a commercial traveller, which called him away from home from time to time. I told him my suspicions in February last. He would not believe it. I and my brother married two sisters. He saw my wife about it, but even then he would not believe it. He was in great distress of mind. My brother has three young children, the youngest nine months old. The father of Mrs. Gadsby is a publican and a man of substance. Cross-examined by Mr. Ssrgeant SHEE—I live not far from my brother's. My father keeps the North Pole. The defendant's house is next door. I was there three or four nights in the week. I saw the defendant at the N..mth, Pole. Mrs. Gadsby kept my father-in-law's accounts. Mr. Esthall has lived there about a twelve menth. He works for my father in-law ' Mr. Elkham. I never visited the Esthalls. Ne ver saw Mrs. Esthall at me brother's. I don't know that the children of the two families play together. I applied to the witnesses when my brother was obliged to go into the country, in Fe bruary. I have looked after my brother's interest, as I had a right to do. Ite-examined by Sir F. THESIGE/t—Elkham-terrace is called after my father-in-law. Defendant is about 32. lie carries on business in the New North- road, at Fins b ill, and at Peckham Rye. Mrs. Edward Gadsby—l am sister of the plaintiff's wife. I mentioned my suspicions to my husband. I never saw any dissension between the plaintiff and his wife. • Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant SUEE—My sister's husband is not intemperate, and he is of a very good temper. He is intoxicated sometimes, the same as other gentlemen are. Re-examined by Sir F. THESIGER—He is especially good tempered when he is intoxicated. Margaret Davison—l formerly lived at Mr. William Cadsby's, the plaintiff. When I went he had two chil dren. I don't know that the plaintiff knew the defend ant. I saw the defendant at my master's house twice before the sth of September, when Mrs. Gadsby was c mfined. I did not let him in. Mrs. Gadsby took him to the parlour. He remained two or three minutes. Mr. Gadsby was absent then. Mrs. Gadsby let him in both times. Mr. Esthall went into Mrs. Gadsby's bed room a few days after she was confined. Ido not know how long he remained. Eight or ten days after Mrs. Gadshy was confined she sent me to fetch the defendant to come and see her. I showed him up to my mistress's b.-droem. Mrs. Gadsby was lying outside the bed, dressed. The nurse was in the room with the baby aed Caroline. Mrs. Gadsby told me to put Caroline to bed. Tice nursa put the baby on the bad and came out of the room. He was left there alone. I don't know how long he remained. Charles, Mr. Elkham's servant, once carried Mrs. Gadsby down stairs to the parlour. The defendant came, as he said, by Mrs. Elkham's orders, and carried Mrs. Gadsby up to her bedroom. Next morning Mrs. Gedshy sent me to fetch Mr. Esthall to carry her down stairs. I gave the message to his sister, and he came at one o'clock and carried her down stairs. Mrs. Gadsby sat in the parlour, which has Venetian Vinds and shutters. Mrs. Gadsby used to sit in the par lour, and would tap at the window, and then Mr. Esthall came to the door, and Mrs. Gadshy let him in. That happened half-a-dozen times. When Mr. Esthall went • into the parlour, the shutters were closed, so that no non could see into the parlour. The defendant remained about a quarter of an hour. Mrs. Gadsby wore a minia ture likeness in her bosom. Frequently it would drop out, when she would pick it up and kiss it. This is the Ji!teness. It is very much like the defendant. Six weeks atrer Mrs. Gadsby was confined I went into the country to Cuckfield with her. The defendant was at the plain tiff's about a week before that. He came at seven in the evening. and left at half-past one in the morning. I heard him come in. He remained in the parlour all the time. They hal no tea. Mr. Elkham came over at about twelve o'clock. He called out to fasten the gate. S on after twelve o'clock he came again, and spoke about the light in the parlour. Mrs Gadsby:told him she was g dm; to bed directly. He came a third time, when Mrs. Gadsby said, the children were ill, and she could not go to bed yet. The candle in the parlour was put out about one o'clock. They remained half-an-hour in the dark. Mrs. Gadsby sent me to see if Mr. Elkham was at 'riding about. I went to the side-door and looked over the gate. I thought I saw Mr. Elkham. Mrs. Gadsby to'd me to see Mr. Esthall safe over the back wall. I saw him get over the wall. I twice took notes to the pent to Mr. Esthall. Mr. Esthall took me and Mrs. O elsby in his cart to the station at London-bridg4. When he asked if there was any more luggage, she re plied. " No, dear." At Cuckfield Mrs. Gadsby went to th 3 post office and got a letter, which she opened imme diately. The letter was on half a sheet of piper; it was very thick writing. This is like the letter. When we returned from the country Mr. Esthall's visits continued. They were in Mr. Gadsby's absence. On one occasion I heard them kiss. I left on my own accord. Mrs. Garisby's dress was much disordered after Mr. Esthalt's vi -its. That was after her return from the country. Sometimes it would sound as if they were romping. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant SHEIK—.I knew Mrs. Esthall. She came sometimes once or twice a week. Mrs. Gadsby went to Mrs. Eathali's two or three times a, week. Mrs. Esthall's little hoy came sometimes'. Ile is about two tears of age. Mr. Gadsby did not go to Mr. Esthali's. Mr. and Mrs. Elkhan were at Mr. avisby's two or three times a week. Mrs. Esthall came on to to see Mrs. Gadsby, when she was ill, not mere. Tire ptrlour is nine feet above the area. I can't swear how many times I have seen Mrs. k3adsby tap at the win dow. lam sure of once. Mr. Esthall would pass the house in going to his business. Mrs. Gadsby had a miniature of her husband, bat larger than that. It is the same colour. When Mr. Esthall got over the wall, I wont round the garden to see if any one was at the windows. I was in the front kitchen by the dresser when I heard them kiss. The other servant's name is Smith. I told the attorney about the tapping at the window, but to no one else. Re-examined by Sir F. THESIGER—I never saw Mrs. Gadsby kiss her husband's miniature. By a jaror-3lr. Esthall never visited when my master was at home. Mary Smith examined—l was servant of all work at Mr. Gadsby's. t was there only two months. I left on account of seeing Mr. Esthall there. I heard him fre quently kiss Mrs. Gadsby, when she let him in and when he went away. He came frequently in the afternoon. When Mr. Esthall was there I had to take care. of the baby. I told Mrs. Gadshy that I would t e ll M r . G a d s b y about it. One day as Mrs. Gadsby was letting Mr. Esthall out of the door, the child said, "Kiss me, Mr. Esthall, as you kissed mamma." The child was never allowed to come up after that. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant WILKINS—I am a servant of all-work. I frail been at Mr. Gedsby's two months when I began to differ with Mrs. Gadsby. Our difference was, Mr. Esthall. Mr. Gadshy complained of me to Mrs. Elkham. Mrs. Elkham told me so. Mrs. Gadsby told me if I was not comfortable I was to leave. I My bates were searched by desire of Mrs. Gadsby. I Nral out of place a fortnight, Mrs. Gadsby was sorry I made so short a stay; she wanted me to stop. w. Re-exarninecl by Sir F. THESIG E It— My mistress ts.bed me not to tell my master that Mr. Esthall came every day, but only now and then. Elizab et h H arper —I am a mon. thly nurse. I nursed I Mrs. Gadsby. Sbo was Esthallwaa at th e h ouse before Mrs. olrs W edn e s day ertiinim.aY in MrA. Gadsby's bed room on the Tue s d ay evening after she was confined. Ile h a d some hrainss2 tison, and Caro line in water. O n th e Thursday after I saw him, Margar ) e .-a tp the room. I think I left th e room t and went down i n t the parlour , hut did not remain any The seco nd time he came Mrs. ASthall was w'ithohfimti.mlet. s p-,ared as if he had not seen Mrs. Gadsby before since her confinement. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant S TIEE-11rs. Esthall came twice. Mrs. Edward Gadshy came four times. p Mr. Joseph Robson — I wasartner with M r . E st h all, Mr belief is that this iA not his handwriting. - Cross-examined by Mr. Serg:: , atat SfiliE—Mr. Esthall he. work to do for Mr. Elkhan, and at the plaintirs horse. They were little jobs at intervals. Joseph Drain—l am a house painter. I know the de feniant's handwriting. Ido not believe this to be his handwriting. I saw Mr. Esrhall a fortnight ago, and in court to-day, but not in the Ring's Arm;. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant WILKIN'S —He knocked me down ; I have an action against him. Sir. F. THESIGER—Then he certainly knows his band. Charles John Freeday examined —I am a surp;eon. I have attended Mr. Garlsby and his family for some years. He has always been very fond of his children a nd his wife. air. Sergeant SHEE then addressed the jury for the defendant, and . said that the entire c ase was supported by Ilur6emaul, for he was sure that the evidence of - - the maid-of all-work had been completely demolished by the cross-examination of Mr. Sergeant Wilkins. The Learned Counsel then commented upon the evidence of Margaret Davison, the nursemaid, and urged upon the jury not to pronounce a verdict against the defendant upon such slight evidence as that. The Learned JUDGE having summed up the evidence, the jury gave a verdict for the defendant. Jane 19. COBBETT V. HUDSON. The plaintiff in this case is the son of the celebrated William Cobbott, and the defendant is the keeper of the Queen's Bench Prison, in which the plaintiff has been confined ever since 1842. The action was brought to recover damages for an alleged false return made by the defendant to a writ of habeas corpus, requiring the de fendant to bring up the body of Mr. Cobbett at the Court at Westminster, for the purpose of showing upon what grounds he was detained in custody. After hearing counsel on either side at some length, Lord DENMAN was of opinion that a false return had not been proved, and that as there was no case made out for the jury, a nonsuit ought to be entered.—Nonsuit entered accordingly. Mr. Knowl , s, Q.C., appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Watson, Q.C., !or the defendant. Mr. Cobbett (the plaintiff) was pre,ent during the trial of the case. JUDGES' CHAMBERS, June 18. BRETIN V. BUNN. This case, which appeared in The Sun on Wednesday last, was again brought before Mr. Justice Coleridge on Tnursday, after the hearing of the summons in " Bunn v. Lind." The application was on the part Of the de fendant, for commissions to examine witnesses in Italy and France, and further, for a postponement of the trial. The matter was now discussed at some length. Mr. Lewis appeared as solicitor for the defendant, in support of the application; and Mr. Ogle attended as counsel for the plaintiff. The defendant had made an affidavit, setting forth that he could not proceed to trial without the evidence of Mademoiselle Taglioni, M. Adrian, and M. Petipa, and that they were resident abroad. On the other hand, the plaintiff made an affidavit, in which he stated that Made moiselle Taglioni, who had a residence at Como, in Italy, had been announced to appear at her Majesty's Theatre, and was at the present period fulfilling an engagement in Germany. The cause had been en tered for trial some time back, and had been made a special jury case by the defendant, and bad now been entered for the present sittings. The plaintiff further stated that the application was made to delay the cause by the detendant, from whom he claimed nearly $OOl. for salary; that he had, being a foreigner, to pay 2001. into court as costs by way of security ; and if the trial was postponed, it would entail great hard. ship and expense on him; and that the witnesses whose attendance he required were connected with her Ma jesty's Theatre and the Italian Opera, Covent garden, and as soon as the season was closed, they would quit England for some time. Mr. Justice COLERIDGE inquired, in the course of the case, whether the action could be referred ? Mr. LEWIS thought not, remarking that there were other engagements which would probably depend on the present action. His LornosinP made an order for the commissions to issue, and for a postponement of the trial and, on his suggestion, the 2001. paid into Court by way of se curity was directed to be paid to the plaintiff. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. OLD COURT. (Before Chief Justice WILDE and Mr. Baron RoLPE.) Ann Cleveland, aged 26. and John Hill, alias Dolly, who stand charged jointly with the murder of the illegitimate child of the female prisoner, were placed at the bar on Friday. Sergeant ALLEN, who was instructed to defend the fe male prisoner, applied to the Court to postpone her trial. He said, she was only committed for trial on the Bth inst., and he was informed by her attorney that he had not had sufficient time to prepare her defence, and if the trial was pos-poned, he expected to be able to ob tain the testimony of some witnesses which would be very material for her defence. Mr. BALLANTINE said he had been instructed by the parish to prosecute the prisoners, and of course the only object of those who instructed him was, that the truth should be ascertained. He had listened with anxiety to hear whether his Learned Friend stated any facts as grounds for his application, as in that case he should have immediately acceded t) it. No such facts, how ever, appeared to be stated, and he would merely call the attention of the Court to the very lengthened in quiry that took place both before the coroner and the magistrate, at which the professional advisers of the pri soners were present. His Learned Friend Mr. Ser geant Allen had also been specially retained for the defence of the female prisoner, and he understood that all parties were in readiness to have the case disposed of that day. Mr. CiAnxsos said, that on the part of the male prisoner he should certainly object to have the trial postponed to the next session He was discharged by the magistrate. and was only implicated in the transaction by the verdict of the coroner's jury. Mr. Sergeant ALLEN said his application at present was, not to postpone the trial to the next session, but merely to a later period of the present one. Chief Justice WILDE, after conferring with Mr. Baron Rolfe, said that the Court was always ready to listen to the application of a prisoner to postpone his trial upon tat representation that he had not had sufficient time to prepare his defence, and would be particularly anxious to do so in a serious case like this ; but at the sama time they must take care not to establish the bad prece dent of postponing trials without any fair or reasonable ground Ening urged for their doing so. All they had to act upon at present was the statement of the attorney that lie might possibly, it delay were granted, obtain some evidence which might be useful to his client, which might be said in the case of every prisoner ; and under these circumstances they felt that all they could do was to let the trial stand over till Monday. Mr. Sergeant ALLEN said he believed this delay would be all that was required, and the female prisoner would be ready to take her trial on that day. John Gorman, 26; Denis Gorman, 20; James Coffee, 27, John Gilbert. 23, and Catherine Gorman, 50, the mother of the first-mentioned prisoners, were indicted for feloniously cutting and wounding James Hubbard and Thomas Carmody, police-constables, in the execu tion of their duty, with intent to do them grievous bodily harm; and in other counts the intent of the pri soners was laid to 1).?, to prevent their lawful appre- hension. Mr. Bodkin (with Mr. Clark) crnducted the prosecu tion for the Treasury ; Mr. Clarkson defended Coffee and Gilbert, and Mr. O'Brien defended the other pri sonors. From the testimony of numerous witnesses who were called in support of the prosecution, it appeared that on the evening of the 24th of May, the prisoners, all of whom ~ re Irish, were in a public house at Pimlico, called the Flak, an I a man, named Minter, who had formerly been pot-boy in the house, was alai) present. According to his statement, when he was about to leave the room, he was attacked, without any provocation, by two of the male defendants, and severely beaten, and when he got out of the house he obtained the assistance of the two constables named in the indictment, who accompanied him back to the Flask for the purpose of taking the per sons who had committed the assault into custody. The moment, however, the constables went into the room they w e r e a tt ac k e d b y t h e pr i soners, who beat then ; violently, and eventually turned them out, and thin barricaded the door. A reinircement of police was sent fir, and the doer was burst open, and a most desperate affray then took place, during which the prisoners mule use of a poker, ispart-pots, and other dangerous instru ments, and the constables received very severe injury. and were prevented from doing any duty for a consider able time. The conduct of the male prisoners appeared to have been most ferocious, and there did not seem to have been the slightestprovocation for what they did from tie beginning to the end of the transaction. The Counsel for the prisoners made the only defence for them that the facts of the case would allow, and urged that although their c niduct had certainly been most vio lent and unjustifiable, yet the jury might conscientiously beliere that they were not actuated by the felonious in tention ascribed to them by the indictment, and merely convict them of an assault. Lord Chief Justice WILDE having left the case to the jury, they returned a verdict, finding the prisoners Guilty up ,n the third count of assaulting the constables with the intent to prevent their lawful apprehension. His LORDSHIP, in passing sentence, told the prisoners that he was of opinion the jury had come to a most hu mane decision with regard to their conduct. The male prisoners appeared to have acted in the most savage and ferocious manner, and the woman who stood in the posi tion of mother to two of them, instead of endeavouring to appease them, appeared to have rather excited them to per:evere in their violence. It was almost a provi dential occurrence that death had not ensued, and if that had been the case, he did not see how they could have escape .l a conviction for murder. Persons in their con dition must be taught that such violent resistance to the officers of justice would always entail severe punishment, and it was absolutely necessary for the protection of sa ciety that this should be the case. He then sentenced James Coffee, who appeared to have been the ringleader in the affray, :o be kept to hard labour for eighteen months, John Gorman for fifteen, John Gilbert and Denis Gorman, twelve months each, and the mother Catherine German, three months".imprisomment and hard labour. FORGERY.—A young man, named Horatio Nelson TV eq, was charged with uttering forged railway scrip. Mr. Clarkson conducted th.. case for the prosecution. The facts are contained in the following evidences— The handwriting of the prisoner being identified, Mr. Bodkin was sworn—Vas a member of the Stock Exchange, and on the 22d of March last received a letter from the prisoner, who requested him to dispose of some scrip which he enclosed, and which purported to be scrip of the London and South-Western Railway Company. He received another letter on the 27th, in which the prisoner stated that, i n consequence o f hi s f ormer l e tt er not having been p rom ptly answere d, h e h a d opene d an accou n t Nvith another br o k er f o r th e sa l e o f a l arge num ber of shares, s h a r e s , v t i. e . , but that h e enc l ose d t wen t y cer tifi cates o f i i la witness disposed of, and sent the proceeds, !shares, and remiiteci 931., to the prisoner. „ I - 17 subsequently disposed of forty Moor - e , o. to the prisoner. The prisoner dated his letter •street,li Birmingham, and signed himself Thomas Perryios , e t a h fterwards remitted the pri soner a sum of 1051 for r r h nFeeds of additional scrip which he had disposed of e forged the. employment of George Brinke, Esq., clerk in Messrs. Sterne and Pitman, stock-brokers, proved scrip in ' question having received 80 of the from the preceding witness. Mr. Simpson, clerk in the employment of Messrs Chalmers, stock - bro kers, stated that h e had received . them from Mr. Grey. Mr. Alfred Morgan, treasurer of the London an d South-Western Railway Company, stated that that cow. pay, in Junnary last, issued 1,01.'1 new bhares, and the 80 shares now produced were forgeries. There was a decided difference between the watermark on the coun- terfeit and that on the genuine scrip. The mark on the spurious scrip was straight, and on that of the genuine scrip it was slightly turned at the- top. This witness was cross-examined by Mr. Ballantine, who appeared for the prisoner, but nothing was elicited to shake his direct testimony. Mr. Emms, of the firm of Emms and Smith, printers to the London and South-Western Railway Company, stated that the forged scrip was not on the same paper as that used at his office. The watermark also was dif ferent. The word " proportionable" in the forged scrip was spelt incorrectly, the o being omitted. Mrs. Mary Ann Dingle proved that the prisoner lodged at her house in Birmingham at the date of the above transactions. He went under the name of Perry. She could not prove his handwriting. Mr. Francis Woral Stevens, of the firm of Stevens, Hansard, and Co., sharebrokers, proved to having sold 50 of the forged scrip, at the desire of the prisoner ; and that he remitted him a cheque for 259/., which the prisoner acknowledged. The prisoner called upon him subsequently, in reference to a mistake which had been made by the banker upon whom the cheque was drawn, who had over-paid 401. The notes had been trace Ito the prisoner, who said his name was West. Henry Reichter, clerk to the preceding witness, de posed to having entered the scrip in question in a book at his office kept for that purpose. Mr. Fitzgerald, of the firm of Stevens, Hansard, and Co., stated that he took the scrip to the station at Lila Nine Elms, and was informed by one of the clerks there that they were genuine, and with that information he was quire satisfied. Mr. Charles Rogers, cashier to Messrs. Bruce and Co., proved having paid the 2591. for the cheque for the scrip. Mr. Morgan, the secretary to the company, proved that these instruments were all forgeries, and that they appeared to have been struck from the same die or plate as the others that had been sold by Mr. Berkley. There was the same mistake in the word " proportionate" at the back of the instrument, and the numbers were higher than any that had been issued by the company. Daniel Forrester, the officer, proved the apprehension of the prisoner, and also that he said he had not been in Birmingham for two years and a half, and denied having applied for any letters at the post-office in Moorgate street, addressed to Mr. Perry. Mr. Morgan was recalled, and in answer to a question put by Mr. Ballantine, he said he did not believe the name of the prisoner was among those who had signed the subscribers' agreement, and the Parliamentary con tract. By Mr. CLARKSON—It was intended to distribute the new shares among the old proprietors of the company who chose to have them, and none had yet been issued to the public. The forged instruments were put in, and one was read. ' It was to the usual effect, certifying that the holder hay ' ing paid 5/. as deposit, and subscribed the necessary do cuments, was entitled to one so/. new share in the capital of the company, &c. Mr. CLARKSON said this was the case for the prose cution. Mr. BALLANTINE then addressed the Court, and said he should submit to their Lordships that there was no ease to go to the jury, because the instrument which was the subject of the alleged forgery was not in truth such an instrument as came within the contemplation of the statute. The prisoner was charged in a variety of forms with forgery, in uttering a forged receipt, a warrant, 'an undertaking, &c., and the whole of the charges were supported by the production of a docu ment which had been described as railway scrip, and the question was, whether this instrument was properly described in any of these counts. First, as to its being a receipt—he should contend that it was perfectly clear it was never intended to be treated as a receipt, or con sidered as such by the company, and it was no more thun a receipt that a statement in a bond, that a certain sum had been paid, could be called a receipt. A receipt was the discharge of the party making the payment; but in this document there was no discharge—it was entirely conditional. The Learned Counsel cited in support of his argument the case of Harvey, in Russell and Ryan, 227, in which the prisoner was accused of forging a re ceipt, and the instrument was in these terms, " William Chenery, Esq., paid to Thompson the sum of 81." It was written on a proper stamp, but no name was signed.. The prisoner was convicted, but the point was reserved for the consideration of the judges whether such an in strument was properly described as a receipt; and the judges held that it was not a receipt, and that the instru ment merely admitted that Chenery had paid the money, but was no acknowledgment of the receipt of it. After the decision that had been come to in the recent case to which he had alluded, he did not think it was neces sary to trouble their Lordships much further with regard to the question as to the instrument being a receipt. Baron ROLFE —You are entitled to this, certainly; that it was the opinion of the Court that it was not a receipt for money. Mr. BALLANTINE considered this quite sufficient, and he was of opinion the same argument would apply to those counts charging the instrument as an accountable receipt. Then, as to its being a warrant for the pay ment of money. A warrant, he contended, was an in strument which authorised a person to pay or receive money, but by this instrument authority was given to no one to do either. The result was merely mentioned upon the parliamentary contract and subscriber's agree ment being signed, but the prisoner had been proved not to have signed either ; and, therefore, in his case he could have no claim upon the company, and the docu ment was so much waste paper. With regard to those counts which treated the instrument as a warrant for the delivery of a valuable security—what were the facts? That the party holding the scrip was entitled to a 501. share in the undertaking, both as regarded profit and loss, and so far from this share representing money or property, it was possible that by incurring a share of liability, it might actually represent a loss instead of a profit. He considered that the same objections would apply to the counts describing the instrument as an un dertaking for the payment of money. There were two questions involved on the point; first, was the instrument in itself a warrant for any purpose whatever? and, se cond, if it were a warrant, could it be considered in any other light than conditional upon the signing the parlia mentary contract and subscriber's agreement? and as the prisoner had been proved not to have performed this ope ration, he submitted that he could not be liable. There was also no evidence that the South-Western Railway Company had any right or authority to issue such in struments ; and he said that if they had no such autho rity. of course the forging them would not be felony. The Learned Counsel then cited a case in which the Master of the Rolls had decided that canal shares did not come within the description of securities, inasmuch as they could be bought and sold ; and he argued that railway shares were of precisely the same character as canal shares. He also reminded the Court that the statute referring to the offence of forgery, and which defined the instruments capable of proving the subject of that charge, had been passed at a period when such an instrument as railway scrip was entirely unknown, and that, therefore, it would hardly be just to suppose that such was contemplated by its provisions. The Leaned I Counsel concluded by calling upon the Court to with draw the case from the jury, and to direct the prisoner to be acquitted of the charge of felony, upon the grounds he had stated. Chief-Justice WILDE having conferred with his Laarned Brother, said it was impossible not to see that this was a question of very great importance and interest to the public, on account of the enormous amount of property invested in securities of this description. He was of opinion that there was very great doubt as to the real character of these instruments, and as the counsel for the prosecution was desirous that the question should be gravely considered by the whole of the judges, he considered that the case ought to go to the jury, and the point raised would then probably be considered by the judges. Mr. CLARKSON said that the company whom he re presented would be perfectly satisfied with a decision so obtained, and would not take any further steps. Mr. BALLANTINE then said that he rested entirely upon the question of law, and as he had no answer upon the facts of the case, he should not address the jury. Chief Justice WILDE then briefly summed up, and the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty, judgment being respitcd to await the decision of the fifteen Judges in November next upon the points of law. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. LAMBETEi On Friday Mr. James Dell Ewen, who called himself a publican out of business, was charged before Mr. Norton with riding in a second-class carriage with a third-class ticket, and refusing to pay the extra charge of fourpence, from Barnes to London, on the Richmond Railway. A gentleman from the office of the solicitors to the South-Western Railway Company, after briefly stating the circumstances under which the prisoner had been given into custody on the night before, read from the company's Act a clause which empowered their officers to give persons into custody for wilfully and knowingly riding in carriages for which they had not paid the proper fare, end also enabled a magistrate to convict such persons in any sum not exceeding 40s. and ex penses. Practices such as those of which the prisoner had been guilty were of frequent occurrence ; but still the object of the company was not so much to press for a penalty as to vindicate the power which the law had given them. Mr. Ewen—And my object was to vindicate the public; I disclaim selfish feeling altogether. Andrew Smith, a ch ecktaker on the South-Western Railway, was then called, and deposed that on collecting the tickets of the train that leaves Richmond at half past nine on the night before, he found the prisoner, a lady, and a child in a second-class carriage, while the two tickets, which had been issued at Barnes, were for the third-class. He (witness) in consequence demanded Bd.; namely, 4d. each for the two tickets, which was the difference of fare; but the defendant refused to pay a farthing, and witness ultimately gave him in charge to the guard of the train. Mr. NORTON—Did he state the reason why he ob jected to pay the difference of fare? Witness—Yes, Sir. He said he had been put into the second-class carriage by One of the company's officers at the Barnes station, though he (the officer) was perfectly well aware at the time that his ticket was for the third-class; but I knew this was impossible, and I told him I could not take his assertion as an excuse. Mr. Ewen—How can you say it is impossible, when I asserted, and am prepared to verify the fact on oath, that they have frequently—ay, times out of number, as well as on the present occasion—done so to me? I now wish you would explain t• his Worship the difference be tween the second and third class carriages. Witness--On the third-class carriages the words, Third-class carriages," are written in large yellow let ters, while there is no writing on the second-class. Mr. E‘ven—Has it ever, or rather has it not fre quently, occurred, that third-class passengers are put !nto the second-class? Witness—Yes, it has, but that ' is only when the tbird-Class are full, and an intimation is given to the guard of the fact when such a circum stance takes place. Mr. Ewen---4 low was Ito know whether the third class carriags were full or:not? I only told you what was the fact, that the company's officers had shown my self and Mrs. raven into the second-class, knowing at the time that we had only third-class tickets. James Lewis said he was guard to the train by which the prisoner had bees a passenger on the night before, and heard the collebtor of the tickets tell him that he would be at liberty to go on the payment of 81, the dif ference of fare, but he refused to pay anything, upon which the collector gave him into his charge. In reply to a question from Mr. NORTON, the witness said there were two third-class carriages belonging to the train, each capable of holding twenty- four passengers, while the passengers in them amounted only to twelve in number, - so that there was plenty of room left for the other passengers. Richard Rose deposed that he was on duty at the Barnes station on the night before, and recollected giving out one first and two third-class tickets. The latter two were issued to the prisoner for himself, a lady, and child. Witness recollected opening a second-class cir riage to let some passengers out, but could not say that he observed what class carriage the prisoner got into. He would swear, however, that he did not show him into the second -elas4, and the only person on duty there at the time besides himself was Clerk, one of the railway police. George C'erk, the policeman alluded to, depos -d to having seen a gen leman get into a first-class car iage, and a gentleman and lady, the latter with a child, get into a second-class. He (witness) did not let the par ties in, nor was he aware at the time of the sort of tickers if this case is n o t p rove d aga i nst me, will Mr. ) Ewen—Nom', your situation f or care l essness or Witness—No; I don't think I shall. neglecto vf. f : du n u —n t ) oNt ? Mr. Ewen—Well, that is all I shall ask you. Mr. Ewen, in reply to the charge, said that he had been in the habit of frequently travelling by the Rich mond Railway as far as Barnes, since it had been opened, and his invariable practice was to go in the third-class carriages, as there was not in his opinion a shade of difference between them and those of the second class; but, as he had before stated, he had frequently, as on the night before, been shown into the second instead of the third without his ever observing it. Having heard many of his friends—indeed his own mother had been played the same trick—complain of being shown into the second-class carriages instead of the third, and then compelled to pay the highest rate for the journey, he had made up his mind that the very first time such a trick was attempted to be practised on him he should, upon public grounds, resist it. This attempt was made on the night before, and he had, as it was his determination, resisted it, and refused the addi tional charge. He had no desire to make use of fine phrases, but he must say that the power possessed by this and o' her companies of giving persons into custody, locking them up, and depriving them of their liberiy, for the negligence, or it might be wilful misconduct of their servants, or for a few paltry pence, was quite un constitutional, and such as should - not be permitted. His Worship heard the gentleman who attended against him say that this sort of practice was of frequent oc currence on the company's line of road. This he (Mr. Ewen) thought an awkward admission, as it was calcu lated to lead to the inference that the company's servants or officers acted wilfully in showing the passengers into a second-class instead of a third-class carriage, so that they should have to pay the difference of fare, and a great many fourpences might be an object to the com pany, which, like all others, was not very partial to third-class passengers. In conclusion, he had only to express a hope that his Worship, taking the whole of the circumstances into consideration, would not consider this a case in which he had wifully, knowingly and in tentionally travelled by a different class carriage than that for which he had paid, for the purpose of cheating the company. Mr. NORTON observed, that from Mr. Ewen's own ad mission of his determination to try the question with the company, he had intentionally gone into a second-cla , s train for that purpose. The defendant's own excuse was, that he had been let into a second-class carriage by a servant of the company, the latter being perfectly cog• niarant of the tact that his ticket was for the third class. Ilad he shown this, he (Mi; Norton) certainly should have dismissed the case; but he was, he confessed, some what surprised at finding, that while the two witnesses, who alone could be guilty of such an act, were under ex atnination, he did not venture to put a single question to them likely to bring out the fact. Mr. Ewen—l could not expect that they would crimi nate thernsAves or risk their-situations, and therefore I did not see the use of questionin g them on the subj ec t. The solicitor on the other side here said, that so averse were the officers of the company to detaining the pri soner, that they offered, upon his paying the Bd., to let him at large, and have the question settled by his Worship. Mr. Nowrox ultimately convicted Mr. Ewen in the penalty of 10s., but subsequently reduced that sum to is., which the defendant paid and was discharged. WORSHIP-STREET. William Brown was charged with stealing a copper boiler, the worm of a still, and the furnace thereof com plete, and 200 cwt. of treacle, said to be the property of Thomas Chubb, a currier, and George Hayward, a but oher, formerly a police-constable of the H division. Sergeant Coleman, of "the H division of police, stated that when the prisoner was brought to the station-house, ke (the sergeant) on the instant sent to the supervisor of Excise, who, however, sent back word that be did not think it worth his while to attend to the case, and the prosecutors had not thought proper to attend. The prisoner said that he was merely an employee of the complainants, who had furnished him with the appa ratus, which he had by their direction fixed in his own domicile, and which, with the 200 cwt. of treacle, also sent to him by them, was to be worked, and the latter manufactured into gin oa his own account, he being answerable for all conse quences which might possibly arise therefrom. A dis agreement had taken place between himself and his em ployers, and ho thought he could account for their ab sence from the court, by stating that he had told them that he would divulge to the magistrate a concern they had, which was in a most flourishing condition. Mr. COMBE, who set for Mr. Broughton, advised the defendant to give the necessary information to the Ex cise, and be would most probably obtain some pecuniary recompense, and added that as there were no prosecu tors he was discharged. The defendant thanked the magistrate and withdrew. BANK RETURNS• (From the London Gazette of Tuesday.) Au Account, pursuant to the Act seventh and eighth Victoria, zap. 32, of the Average Amount of Bank Notes, of the several Banks of Issue in England and Wales, in Circulation daring the Week ending Satur day, the sth day of June, 1847: Average PRIVATE BANKS. Amount. Abingdon Bank, Abingdon—Knapp and Co 24,493 Andover Bank, Andover—Heath and C 0.... 15,579 Ashford Bank, Ashford—Jemmitt and Pomfret 10,445 Aylshatn Bank, Aylsham—R. and E. Copeman 5,551 Aylesbury Old Bank, Aylesbury—Rickford and llont Baldoek Bank and Baldoek and Biggleswade .ialdock—Wells, Hogg, and Lindsell... 33,181 Barn3tai,le Bank, Barnstaple--Drake and Co 13,491 Basingstoke and Odihafflt Bank, Basingstoke — Cole, Seymour, antJ Co. Be.ltot d Bank, Bedford—T. Barnard • 33,025 ;3edford and Bedfordshire Bank, Bedford — Trapp, Halfhead, and Co. Bead ley Bank, Bewdley—Nichols, Baker, and ( ;rule Clicester and Oxfordshire Bank and Oxford Bank, Bicester—Tubb, Wootten, and Co. ilivirongham Bank, Birmingham—Attwoods, Spooner, and Co 23,729 Rim-tit:olam and Warwickshire Bank, Binning- hank Lewis, Moilliett, and Co 17,730 Bland ford Bank, Blandford—Bastard and Oak 8,773 Boston Bank, Boston—Garfit and Co 70,092 Boston Bank, Boston—Gee and Co Bridg ,viter Bank, Bridgwater—E. &J. Sealey 9.690 Bristol Bank, Bristol—Miles, Harford, and Co. 34,786 Brosele . ,, and Bridgnorth, and Bridgnorth and 13roseley Bank, Broseley—Messrs. Pritchard 22,877 Buck ing ham Bank, Buckingham Bartlett, Parrott, and Co. Bury and Suffolk Bank, Sudbury Bank, Market Bank, Bury—Oakes, Bevan, and Co. Reel ury Bank, Banbury—Gillett and Tawney. 39,763 EIR Ty Old Bank, Banbury—Messrs. Cobb... 55,455 Oct,. City Bank, Bath—Meger and Son . 2,592 Bedfordshire Leighton Buzzard Bank, Leighton Buzzard—Bassett and Grant 36,520 Birmingham Bank, Birmingham—Taylor and Lloyds Bradford Old Bank, Bradford, Yorkshire—H and A. Harris Brecon Old Bank, Brecon—Wilkins and Co 64,725 Bridport Bank, Bridport—S. and W. E. Gundry 22,747 Brighton Union Bank, Brighton—Hall, West, and Borrer 8,325 28,090 Burlington and Driffield Bank, Burlington— Harding, Smith, and Co Bury St. Edmunds Bank, Bury St. Edmunds— .). Worlledge and Co. Bromsgrove Bank and Stourbridge and Broms grove Bank, Bromsgrove—Rufford, Biggs, and Co. 15,818 Cambridge Bank, Cambridge—Mortlock and Sons Cambridge and Cambridgeshire Bank, Cam bridge—Messrs. Forsters Canterbury Bank, Canterbury—Hammond and Co • 28,463 Carmarthen Bank, Carmarthen—Morris and Sons 3,089 20,094 22,056 Chertsey Bank, Chcrtsey—Messrs. La Coste Colchester Bank, Colchester—Round, Green, and Co. 1 9 *7211 Colchester and Essex Bank, Witham and Essex Bank, and Had Leigh Bank, Suffolk, Colchester —Mills, Bawtree, and Co 39,717 Cornish Bank, Truro—Tweedy and Co Coventry Bank, Coventry—Little and Wood cock 3 480 9,926 City Bank, Exeter—Milford and Co Craven Bank, Settle—Birkbecks and Co. Christchurch Bank, Christchurch—Tice, Welsh, and Co 2,330 Cardiff Bank, Cardlff—Towgood and Co 6,566 Chepstow Old Bank, Chepstow Bank, Mon mouth Old Bank, Monmc uth Bank, Brecon Bank, and Ross and Herefordshire Bank, Chepstow—Bromage, Snead, and Co. Derby Bank, Derby—Messrs. Evans Derby Bank, Derby—Smith and Co. Derby Old Bank and Scarsdale and High Peak Bank, Derby—Crompton, Newton, and Co.— 26,018 Devizes and Wiltshire Bank, Devizes—Hughes, Locke, and Co Diss Bank, Diss—Oakes, Fincham, and Co Doncaster Bank, Doncaster—Leatham, Tew, and Co. Doncaster Bank and Retford Bank, Doncaster — Cook and Co. Dover Union Bank, Dover—Latham, and C 0.... Darlington Bank, Durham Bank, and Stockton on-Tees Bank, Darlington—Backhouse, and 18,043 10,517 11,779 57,154 Co Devonport Bank, Devonport—Hodge and Nor man k Dorsetshire Bank Dorchester Old Ban. an_ Jorm... Dorchester—Williams and Co. East Cornwall Bank, Liskeard—Robins, Foster, and Co. East Hiding Bank, Beverley—Bower, Hutton, and Co. Essex Bank and Bishops Stortford Bank, Chelmsford—Walford. and Co Exeter Bank, Exeter—Sanders and Co Fakenham Bank, Fakenham—Gurneys, Birk beck, and Co. Farringdon Bank and Bank of \Vantage, Far ringdon—Barnes and Medley Farnham Bank, Farnham—Messrs. Knight Faversham Bank, Faversham—Hilton and Co Goilalming Bank, Godalming—Mellersh and 83,908 10,410 42,126 Keen Grantham Bank, Grantham—Kewney and King Guildford Bank, Guildford—Messrs. Haydon... Grantham Bank, Grantham—Hardy and C 0.... Hastings Old Bank, Hastings—Smith, Hader, and Co. floretln-d City and County Bank, Hereford— Matthews and Co. Hertfordshire Bank and Ware Bank, Ware— s. Adams and Co. :03,283 48,590 50,598 30,340 21,606 8,583 13,412 5,070 5,549 18,991 13.466 26,949 28,652 17,293 hull Bank and Kingston-upon-Hull Bank, Hull —Smith, Brothers, and Co. Huntingdon Town and County Bank, Hunting don—Rust and Veasey Harwich Bank, Harwich—Cox, Cobbold, and Co Hemel Hempstead Bank, Hemel Hempstead— Smith, and. Whi tti ngs tall Iloniton Bank, Honiton—Flood and Co. I ler t fo rd s hire, Hitchen Bank, Hitchen—Sharples and Co. Ilerdord, Ross, and Archenfield Bank, and Ross and Archenfield Bank, Hereford—Dorgan, Hoskins, and Co Ipswich Bank, Ipswich—Bacon and Co. Ipswich and Needham Market Bank, Suffolk, Iladleigh Bank, Manningtree and Mistley Bank, and Woodbridge Bank, Ipswich— Alexat:ders an 3 Co. iCelitish Bank, Maidstone—Mercer, Randall, and Mercer Kiligton and Radnorshire Bank, Kington—J. 16,755 18,474 54,090 5,838 23,083 13,980 36,786 1 ravies and Co Knighton Bank Knighton—J. Davies and Co. Knaresborough Old Bank and Ripon Old Bank, Knaresborough—Terry and Co Kendal Bank, Kendal—Wakefield, Crewdson, and Co. Kettering Bank, Kettering—Goteh and Sons... Lane Ead Staffordshire Bank, Lane End—C. 22,760 21,265 74,334 12,65 23.777 7,392 21,239 44,413 8,832 5,246 50,977 llarvcy and Son Leeds Bank. Leeds—Beckett and Co Leeds Union Bank, Leeds—W.Williams, Brown, 3. and 0 Leek and Staffordshire Bank, and Leek and Congleton Bank,Leek—Fowler,Gaunt,andCo. 423 Leioester Bank, Leicester—Pagets and Kirby 26,608 Lewes Old Bank, Lewes—Molineux and Co 37,846 L;AF.eld Bank, Lichfield—Palmer and Green 17,512 Lincoln Bank, Lincoln—Smith land Co 91,419 Lkodovery Bank and Llandilo Bank, Llando very—David Jones and Co. : oughborough Bank, Loughborough—Middle ms and Cradock 7,24 NAVAL INTELLIGENCE. PORTSMOUTH, JUNE 18 —The Serpent, 16, and the Champion, 18, were undocked last e ven i ng ; h av i ng un dergone a thorough.repair. The Orestes, 18, was docked to day to be repaired, as were also the Echo and Rocket steamers. The Echo has only this week returned from Woolwich, at which place she had her engines repaired; but it appears that they could not spare her a d.ck, and the repairs to her hull were obliged to be deferred till her arrival here. The Scourge steam-sloop is stripped, and will, it is believed, be paid off the Le4inning of the week; although even this is doubtful, for so changeable are our naval rulers that last evening they ordered her, if possible, to be taken to Woolwich. It all depends, therefore, on the state of her engines. If they are trustworthy, she will be rigged again , and proceed to the river; if not, she will remain here. The . Maria Somes transport, Lieutenant John R. Black agent, sailed this afternoon for Cork to embark pensioned t s tne in fluential a deputabtoiodny settlers for Canada. fr The dockyard ar ti zans h av ing o bj ec tions to wearing ~ w o a m ite t d he on working the undr e ss uniform assigned for them in the streets of the theh e r most shipw r i g h t, yesterday, to reques t permission to deposit their d resses i n the yar d ever y night after drill, which request being gran t e d with the greatest ap nJgohsnniFPwinrcighnarnts, parent good- will, the men greeted him with three cheers, and appeared highly gratified with his kindness. In Harbour—The Victory, the Excellent, the Vic toria and Albert, and the Vengeance; the Avenger, the Scourge, the Tartarus, the Undine, the Myrtle, and the Fairy steamers. At Spithcad—The St. Vincent and the Howe. In the Basin—The Britannia, the Ajax, the Retribu tion, and the Odin. In Dock—The Prince'Regent, the Orestes, the Sap pho, the Leander, the Echo, and the Rocket. Orders have been issued by the Board of Ordnance to convert the curtain which connects the platform bat tery with the King's bastion on these 'walls into a for midable battery for the heaviest metal, by raising it tt.r.e feet higher (its height from the footpath being now about five feet) and cutting embrasures at proper dis tances the er.tire length. the raising the curtain of the King's bastion, which we noticed some time since, is being rapidly proceeded with, and the saluting battery will shortly undergo similar alterations, and the six pounders with which it is at present mounted give place to far heavier metal. _ _ PLYMOUTH, JUNE 17.—His Danish Majesty's cor vette Flora, Captain Ellbrecht, sailed this morning for the North Sea. Wind E.S.E., blowing strong. Her Majesty's steam-sloop Growler, Commander Pothury, alter being 60 miles to the westward of Scilly, put back yesterday, having encountered heavy gales of wind. Her chain-bolts are drawn and broken, and she is gone up Hamoaza to repair damages. TILE PRILOLOGICAL SCI/00/:—Friday the an nual examination of the students educated in this insti tution took place at the school-howe in the New-road. The Lord Bishop of Lichfield presided, and was sup ported by the Rev. It. Walpole, RD., the Rev. E. Sco bell, M.A., the Rev. W. J. Hutchings, M.A., the Rev. C. 'P. Johnson, 8.D., and several other clergymen and gentlemen. The examination was conducted by the Lord Bishop of Lichfield and the Rev. Edwin Abbott, M.A., the head master of the school. The students were examined in Thucydides, Herodotus, Xenophon , Virgil, Sallu , t, Horace, and other Greek and Latin classics; in Euclid's elements, trigonometry, and other branches of mathematical science, as well as in all the subjects pert lining to a sound and liberal English edu cation. In Higious subjects there was also a close ex amination. At the close of the proceedings the Bishop of Lichfield addressed the students, congratulating them upon the success which had already crowned their exertions, and urging them to renewed perseverance. The Right Rev. Prelate then retired, and the meeting broke up. YANKEE TRICK ON A PILOT.—One day last week the Crosskirk pilot-boat boarded the American brig Eurotus, of New Orleans, the captain of which engaged one of the men to pilot him through the Pentland Firth, who was to have a barrel of flour for his fee. The vessel was safely piloted through the Firth, and the pilots re turned, bringing with them the supposed barrel of flour, which, on opening, turned out to be nothing but a mix ture of oakum, rope ends, his of wood, flour, and Indian corn—the sweepings of th• vessel ! The captain had come from some port in Ireland, and was bound for •st. retergbUrgb ,— Caithness Chronicle. Average Amount. Oxfordshire Witney Bat.k Witney—Williams, Clinch, and Co 9;988 Pease's Old Bank, Hull, the Hull Old Bank and Beverley Bank, Hull—Pease and Co 46,105 Penzance Bank, Penzance—Batten and Co 11,144 ?exrborough Bank and Oundle Bank, Peter borough—MeT-rs. Yorke Peterborough Bank, Peterborough—Simpson, White, and Simpson 11,542 Pe:ubrokeshire Bank, Haverford west—J. and W. Walters Penzance Union Bank, Falmouth Bank, and Truro Bank, Penzance—Rickets, Enthoven and Co Reading Bank, Reading—imnonas and Co 37,816 Reading Bank, Reading—Stephens,Blandy, and Co Richmond Bank, Richmond—Ste pleton and Co Ringwood and Poole Bank, and Town and County of Poole Bank, Ringwood—Ledgard and Sons Rochdale Bank, Rochdale—Clement, Royds, 10,755 3,6479 6.461 10,358 4,780 and Co Rochester, Chatham, and Strood Bank, Roches ter—Day and Nicholson Romsey and Hampshire Bank, Romsey—Foot ner and Son Royston Bank, Royston—Fordharn and Sons 14,60. Rugby Bank, Rugby—Butlin and Son 13,861 Rye Bank, Rye —Curteis, Pomfret, and Co 18,455 Reigate and Darking Bank, and Reigate, Croy don, and Darking Bank, Reigate—Nash and Co 13,153 Ross Old Bank, Herefordshire, Ross—Pritchard and Allaw ay Saffron Walden and North Essex Bank, Saffron Walden—Messrs. Gibson Salop Bank, Shrewsbury—Burton, Lloyd, and Co 17,536 Scarborough Old Bank, Scarborough—Woodall and Co Shrewsbury and Market, Drayton Bank, Shrews bury—Adams, Maths, and Co Shrewsbury Old Bank, and Shrewsbury and Ludlow Bank, Shrewsbury— Rocke, Eytons, and Co . . Sittingbourne and Milton Bank, Sittingbourne —Valiance and Son Southampton Town and County Bank, South ampton—Maddiron and Son Southwell Bank, Suuthwell—Wylde and Co. 13,466 St. Alban's Bank. St. Alban's—J. S. Story 2,117 Salisbury Bank, Salisbury—Messrs. Brodie 20,929 Shaftesbury Bank, Shaftesbury— Brodie and King Southampton and Hampshire Bank, Southamp ton—Atherly and Fall Stone Bank, Stone—W. Moore 7,039 Stourbridge Bank, Stourbridge —Rufford, Wragg, and Co 17,132 Stafford Old Bank, Stafford—Stevenson and Co 11,507 Stamford and Rutland Bank, Stamford—Eaton, Cayley, and Co. . 31,605 Stourbridge Old Bank, Stourbridge—Bate and Robins Shrewsbury and Welshpool Bank, Shrewsbury —Beck, Downward, and Co. 23,97. St. Alban's and Herts Bank, St. Alban's—Gib son and Stuart 2,222 Taunton Bank, Taunton—Messrs. Badcock 25,530 Tavistock Bank, Tavistock—Gill, Rundle, and Co Thornbury Bank, Thornbury—Rolph, Yates, and 8,426 4,065 8,055 ~ . 34,226 2,958 8,943 18,078 9,763 Parslow Tiverton and Devonshire Bank, Tiverton—Duns ford and Barne Thrapston and Kettering Bank, Northampton shire, Thrapston—Yorke and Eland 10,497 Tring Bank and Chesham Bank, Tring—But cher and Son Towcester Old Bank, Towcester—J. and S Percival Union Bank, Cornwall, Helston—Vivian and Co 14,247 Uxbridge Old Bank, Uxbridge—Hull, Smith, and Co. Wallingford Bank, Wallingford—Wells and Co. Warwick and Warwickshire Bank, Warwick— Kelynge, Greenway, and Co. Wellington Somerset Bank, Wellington—Fox, Brothers West Riding Bank, Wakefield, and Pontefract Bank, Wakefield—Leatham, Tew, and Co Whitby Old Bank, Whitby—Simpson, Chap man, and Co Winchester, Alresford, and Alton Bank, Win chester—Bulpett and Co. Winchester and Hampshire Bank, Winchester —Wickham and Co Weymouth Old Bank and Dorchester Bank, Weymouth—Elliott and Pearse Wirkesworth and Ashbourne Derbyshire Bank, Wirkesworth—Arkwright and Co. Wisbech and Lincolnshire Bank, Wisbech— Gurney and Co. Wiveliscombe Bank, Wiveliscombe—P. and W. Hancock Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhampton—Good ricke and Holyoake. Worcester Bank, Worcester—Farley, Lavender, and Co. Worcester Old Bank and Tewkesbury Old Bank, Worcester—Berwick, Lechtnere, and Co Worcestershire Bank, Kidderminster—Farley and Turner Whitby Bank, Whitby—Frankland and Wil- 8,890 22,241 10,510 28,322 44,199 13,679 20,390 14,965 35,650 55,422 12,660 76,864 10,512 kinson Walsall Old Bank, Walsall—Charles Foster and Sons Warminster and Wiltshire Bank, Warminster— 19,949 Everett and Co. Wrexham Bank, Wrexham—J. and S. Kenriek Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhampton — Messrs. Fryer Yarmouth and Suffolk Bank, and Halesworth and Suffolk Bank, Yarmouth—Gurney, Birkbeck, and Co. Yarmouth, Norfolk, and Suffolk Bank, Great Yarmouth—Sir E. K. Lacon, Bart., and Co Yeovil Old Bank, Yeovil—E. and J. Batten York Bank. York—Swann. Clouzh. and Co JOINT-STOCK BANKS. Bank of Westmoreland, Kendal Barnsley Banking Company, Barnsley Bradford Banking Company, Bradford Bilston District Banking Company, Wolver hampton Bank of Whitehaven, Whitehaven Bradford Commercial Banking Company, Brad- 19,515 1,685 11,069 4,6987 10,464 7,044 42,626 10,437 8,347 46,623 9,910 31,683 19,144 ford .... Burton, Uttuxeter, and Staffordshire Union Banking Company, Burton-upon-Trent Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Banking Company, Cheaterfield Cumberland Union Banking Company, Work ington . Cheltenham and Gloucestershire Banking Com pany, Cheltenham Coventry and Warwickshire Banking Company, Coventry Coventry Union Banking Company, Coventry 16,030 County of Gloucester Banking Company, Chel -118,732 tenham Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Company Carlisle Carlisle City and Distriq Bank, Carlisle 19,427 Dudley and %Vest Bromwich Yanking Company, Dudley Derby and Derbysh ire B ankin g Company,Derby 19,175 Darlington District Joint-Stock Banking Com pany, Darlington 23,841 East of England Bank, Norwich Gloucestershire Banking Company, Gloucester. 148,296 Halifax Joint-Stock Bank, Halifax 16,634 Huddersfield Banking Company, Huddersfield 32,609 Hull Banking Company, Hull 28,425 Halifax Commercial Banking Company, Halifax 12,565 Halifax and Huddersfield Union Banking Com pany, Halifax Helston Banking Company, Helston 1,238 Herefordshire Banking Company, Hereford 20,926 Knaresborough and Claro Banking Company, Knaresborough Kingsbridge Joint-Stock Bank, Kingsbridge 4,034 Lancaster Banking Company, Lancaster 57,453 Leeds Banking Company, Leeds Leicestershire Banking Company, Leicester Lincoln and Lindsey Banking Company, Lincoln 48,500 Leamington Priors and Warwickshire Banking Company, Leamington Priors Leeds and West Riding Banking Company, 54,3 7,999 34,072 10,448 Leeds Leeds Commercial Banking Company, Leeds Ludlow and Tenbury Bank, Ludlow Moore and Robinson's Nottinghamshire Bank ing Company, Notting ham 27,241 Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Banking Company, Nottingh am Newcastle. Shields, and Sunderland Union Joint- Stock Banking Co m p an y , Newcastle , 73,,55 National Provincial Bank of England, Birming ham, head-office, 112, Bishopsgate-street, London ............................. North Wilts Banking Company, am 54,171 Northamptonshire Union Bank, Northampton 78,383 Northamptonshire Banking Company, North ampton ............................. . ...... North and South Wales Bank, Liverpool 55,185 Pares's Leicester shire Banking Company, Lei cester ..... ..... ................................... ••••• 52 ,314 Saddleworth Banking Company, Saddleworth... 3,080 Sheffield Bankillg Company, Sheffield 35,565 Stamford, Spalding, and Boston Banking Com pany, Stamiord . Stuckey's Banking Company, Bristol Somerset shire Bank, and Somerseishire Bank, L ang . p0rt............ . ................. ~ Shropshire Banking Company, Shifinall ... Stourbridge and Kidderminster Banking Com pang, Stourbridge Sheffield and liallamshiro Banking Compa n y, Sheffield ..... ........................................ 2,3164 Sheffield an d Rotherham Joint- Stock Bank ing Comp and V Company, SL Nn ell e lci s d leyd 52,023 Swaledaleale Banking C ompany, Ri c hmond.. . Stockton and Durham County Banking Com pany, Stockton. • •• Storey and Thomas's Banking Company, Shaftesbury Sheffield and Retferd p ß taa a ffn n oy k r,d , l S sph h si e rw ffi eicß e h l a d nk . i .. ng w Su o ff l o v l e k rh ß a a m n p k t i o n n .2. a Cz s ri Com pany,wakefieWld o a l n v d er n h a a r m u to y n 34,122 Union Bank, Walcefle 1d12444 Whitehaven Joint-Stock Banking Company, Warwick White d ha a v n en Lewaiigton Banking Company, 3P°595 West ofEn Leamingtonglane. awl South Wales District 3543 Bank,l3ristol . .......... ...... ................... ... 76,764 8,480 9,296 898 Lymington Bank, Lymington—C. and S. St. Barbe Lyn; Regis and Lincolnshire Bank, Lynn Regis —Gurneys and Co. Lynn Regis and Norfolk Bank, Lynn Regis— Massey and Co. Macclesfield Bank, Macclesfield—Brooklehurst and Co anningtree Bank,Manningtree—Nunn and Co Marlborough Bank, Marlborough and Wilts Old Bank, Marlborough Old Bank, Marl borough Old Bank and Hungerford Bank, and Flungerford Bank, Marlborough—Tanner and Pinckney Marlborough aad North Wiltshire New Bank, Marlborough—Ward, Merriman, and Hillier Merionethshire Bank, Dolgelly—Jones and Miners' Bank, Truro—Willyume and Co Monmouthshire Agricultural and Commercial Bank, Abergavenny—Baileys and Co Monmouth Old Bank, Monmouth Bank, Brecon Bank, Chepstow Bank, Chepstow Old Bank, and Ross and Herefordshire Bank, Monmouth —Bromage and Snead. Monmouthshire Newport Old Bank, Newpc^t —W. Williams and Sons Newark Bank,' Newark—Godfreys and Hutton Newark and Sleaford Bank, and Sleaford and Newark Bank, Newark—Handley, Peacock, and Co Newbury:Bank, Newbury—Bunny and Slocock. Newmarket Bank, Newmarket—Eaton, Ham mond, and Son Norfolk and Suffolk Bank, Diss—Taylor and J)yson Norwich Crown Bank, Norwich—Harveys and lindsons Norwich and Norfolk Bank, Norwich—Gur neys and Co Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Bank, Not tingham---,Hart, Fellows, and Co Nuneaton Bank, Nuneaton—Craddcock and Naval Bank, Plymouth—Harris, Mudge, and New Srrum Bank, Sarum—Hrtley, Everett, and ()0 • Nottingham Bank, Nottingham—Smith and Co Oswestry Bank and Oswestry Old Bank, Os westry—Croxpn and Co Oxford Bank, Oxford—J. and R. Morrell )xfird '.)ld Bank, Oxford—Robinson, Parsons, and Th0mp50n........... . 91d Bank Tonbridge, Tonbridge and Tonbridge Wells Old Bank, Tonbridge and Tonbridge Wells and Sevenoaks Bank, Tonbridge— Beeching and Sons... .................. 3,888 39,327 14,195 11,737 67134 13,453 10,438 10,690 16,907 25,515 15,893 7,490 26,922 51,557 34,275 20,507 3,348 42,734 71,92 1 0,9 02 4,982 22,723 13,167 27,564 16,465 12,928 32,957 8,361 Average Arco Wilts and Dorset Banking Company, Salisbury 63,87 West Riding Union Banking Company, Hud dersfield Whitchurch and Ellesmere Banking Company, Whitchurch . Worcester City and County Banking Company, 6,460 Worcester.... York Union Banking Company, Y0rk............ 67,060 Yrk oCity and County Bankinw Company, York 982 Yorkshire Banking Company;leeds P. DEo AN S, Registrar f Bank Beturn?. 2 Stamps and Taxes, Juno 12, 1847. Y•) MARKET NEWS.-(SATURDA COVENT-GARDEN. Very extensive supplies of most articles were on sale, yet the trade was firm as follows : —Gooseberries , is Gd to 26d s 6d ; and Currants, 3s to 55 per ha l f sieve ; Greens, Is ; to 2s Gd per dozen bunches • Cauliflowers, Isdotzen heads; o 23 3(1 and Summer Cabbages, 8(.1 ' to Is 6d per Forced French Beans, is 3d to Is 9d per 100; Green Peas, Is 3d to 3s per halt-sieve; Potatoes (old), 8s to 13s per cwt ; ditto, (new). 3d to 8d per lb ; T u rnips, Is Gd to 31 6(11 and Carrots 5s to is per dozen bunches ; Horseradish, is 6d to 3s •, Celery, is to 2s 3 d ; and Asparagus, is tobers,4s per bundle; Strawberriss, 4 d to 9d p er Pottle; Cucum 3d to Is each; Spring On ions, 3d to 6d per bunch; Radishes, 3d to Gd per dozen hands; Mushroole; ,ns, 15 to is 6(1 per Pottle; Rhubarb , 4 d to Is per 6d to , bund Hot house Grapes, 2s 6,1 to 4s 6d per lb; Cos Lett uces, Is per score. NEWGATE AND X.EADENEAI.7... rices. Prime Beef, Mutton, and La mb, sold firmly at full p In other kinds of meat comparatively' little was doing. Beet. from 3s 8d to 4s 8d; Mutton, 3s 10d to 55 2d ; Lamb, 5s 4cl" to 6s 2d; Veal, 4s to ss; and Pork,;A 10d to ss. Pucks, Is. 9d to 2s 9d • Turkeys, 3s to 6s 6d ; d Pigeons, 10d to Is d . each ; Fowls, ' 3s to 83 per couple; Eggs, 68 to 7s 64 per WO; Fresh Butter, 10d to is per lb. NEWPORT. Beef, from 3s 6d to 4 s 8d •, Mutton, 4s to 5s 2d Lomb, ; 5s 81 to 6s 4 d; Veal , 4 s 4d to ss; and Pork, 4 g to 5s per Blbs. IiUNGERFORD. h There was a full average supp l y of most articlesstat on s!le here, while the general demand wa s in a slugg ise,. at drooping prices. WHITECIMPEI. Beef, from 3s 6d to 4s 6 d ; Mutton, 43 Od to 5s Od ; Lamb, 5s 6d to 6s 2d; Veal, 4 s to 53 O d ; and Pork, 3s 10d to 55 per Blbs. BILLINGSGATE . A large supply of most kinds of F ish was on offer, and the quotations had a downward tendency. BREAD. o li s are fron t The prices of Wheaten Bread in t he metro lid to 11 1 / a d ; of household ditto, 9 1 /0d to 10 t, '':d per 41ba loaf. ' HIDE MARKET. Market Hides, 561 b to 641 b, 2 1 Ad to to per lb; do. 641 b is 8 7 108 21 41b 113 ,4 ( d 1 5 t 4t 0 0 3 d 1, t i 0vi d 6d ; d; do. d 0 7 . 2 8 1 8 b u t, o t 0 8 0 9 1 6 b 1 , b 3:/, d t o 3 3 ,4 d ; do.Bolb to Hides, 13s ; Shearlings, 10d to is 2d i ; ; Calf Skins, each, '4s 9d to 6s 6d ; Horn HAY DIARICETS 1/2Ldam to b s s d , 2 ; sdtoo. 2s 6d• to SurrttFmn.--Meadow Hav, 2/55 to 31 15s ; Clover ditto 31 5s to 41 15s; and Straw, 1/ 6s to 111 is per load. T om ' dull, at about stationary prices. Clover, ditto, CUMBERLAND 3/ 8s to 4/ 12s ; ea and Straw, 118. to 11 12s pa Io- Supply but moderate_,..and trade rather dull. 3l 1" Clover WIIITECHAPEL.—IIIeadow Hay, 2/ 55 to .35; Cl ov e r ditto. 3/ os to 4/ ns ; and Straw, 1/ 0 to 1112 s per loal• A full average supply, and a heavy demand. LLOYD'S SHIPPING reeze, and Losnos, JUNE 19.—Wind N.N.W., light b fine, thou cloudy at times. DEA 18. E::es j th u o N r E pe, lB. ]:lo W ulm in —Arrd. Statesman, New Orleans, and sailed for Bremen. Calcutta; edinli;gbct oainu,di:bauris,abl:h;orr.tisr., westerly. Simon Glover, Bailey, Monte Video; James Cruikshan.kr Sayers, St. Vincent's; Zante, Paterson, Havan nah ; Miffi li sippi, Harvey. Baltimore;_ Harvest, Fuller, ditto, and sa!le. for B reme n ; Venerable, Martin, St. John's, New Brunswica, and sailed for Hull ; Sultana and Selina, WLaren, Arrd, from the River, Competitor, Adelaide, South Australia' Maur itius, Jane Frances, Hobart Town ; Oriental Queen, Mina, Barbadoes ; Zealous, Quebec. —The LIVERPOOL, JUNE 18.—Wind IC.N.Pir., moderate. . Alfred, N ew O r leans to this port, was on th used of the Alogadore. sissippi, about the 20th ult. A ship, supp to be d the: 1: 1 Cassilda, of Wiscassit, abandoned, and on fire, Was b ° , *l4:l ,i, on the Bth instant, in lat. 46 ion. 34, by the Lady &Wan. arrd. here. The crew were, in all probability taken off b! a vessel seen in the distance, as two empty boat's were sou about s a l m ile from the wreck. Arrd. Joshua Wadding Ceti Wakeham, Matanzas ; Dolares, Laguna ; Joseph Porters Reed, Philadelphia ; Royal Sovereittn, Flood, N eff Yor o tl Grassmere, Vale, New York. Siti. Orleans, Calcutta; Jii.". Bull, Calcutta ; Relampago, Havannah ; Illercidataa.,"._ vannah ; Felipa, Hayannah ; Queen, Staten Island; 1'" Boston ; Sherllke, Quebec. SLIGO, JUNE roo 17.—The British ring, from Savannabl; Liverpool, was abandoned full of water, 3d inst., in N., lon. 38 W., having been in contact with the Paola Liverpool to New York, which received considerable dataag_es t ok off the crew and transferred them to the Ind s an fared here. 'rat CORK, JUNK 16.—Wind S.W. to N.W.—Arrd, Adno , g en Cubs t Nelson, Le Bas. Macao; Princess Charlotte, Shaw, Saragossa, M'Manus New Orleans; Ellen Brown, lat.. !. Norfolk; Margaret donnel, Fleet, ditto. GREENLAND SEAL FISHIN. . A b LIMERICK, JUNE 14.—The St. George, Wells. arri v ` — - er° from Greenland, reports the following to the 14th ult. :":" nn , The Anne, of Hull, with 6,600 seals ; Forth, ditto, 8er,,,,:. Eliot, ditto, 3,200; Sinallaco, ditto, 2,900; Sarah and ''' . ,... c - e, beth, ditto, 4,400; Eclipse, of Peterhead, 4,400 ; ditto,Conni ditto, 4,000; Dublin, ditto, 6,000; North of Scotland, ~,,0i f U l n an io n n i , ba d l i , tt d o i , t B to ,o , oo 4,o ; 5,000; Gleaner, ditto, 3,200 ; Hamilton, Ross, ditto, 60-L,,•' ~ 00Su;pEernioterr,pdriitsteo: sdoOitt;o,F6aob3o',;ditFtisorogo: of Aberdeen, 1,900. COWES, ISLE OF WIGIIT (FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDE NT ' ) 1847. J U NE 18, ROYAL YACHT SQUADRON INTELLIGES"' ARRIVALS. June 13. Fair Rosamond sc hooner, William 14°°' Esq., from Portsmouth. • eh 14. Alarm cutter, Jos. Weld, Esq., from Won . 15. Osprey cutter, John Petre l Esq., from Torbali., Maud schooner, Thomas Leigh, Esq., from Cherbourto 17. Water Lily, yawl, John thbbert, Back, ir Eastward. Cherbourgh SAILINGS. R.N.l,nfeorl7P. l)M.maouudths.chooner, Thomas Leigh, Esq- , for ; Noran cutter, Sir H. B. Hoghtoth BON for Tynewouth ; Lark, ditto, Captain C. H. Williams, 18. Witch cutter, Henry Oglauder, ward on ' a cruise. Esq., for West- YACHTS AT AND ABOUT THE STA.TION. Schooners—Fair Rosamond, Fairy, Esmeralda, Merlin. Yawl—Water Lily. Cutters—Elizabeth, Tu r q uoise, Antelope, T a lisman, Os p rey, and Alarm. GARDE" JA SUDDEN DEATH AT VAUXHALL in vauv stances of a very distressing nature occurred uriday hall Gardens about half-past eleven o'clock on I n s Aso melancholy instance of sudden death under eireual* evening. The unfortunate deceased, Mr. janie a nd nall, was a member of the corporation of LlYerpo 0 some few years since held the office of mayor t.L.ll+ important borough. Mr. Aspinall was in towThursdayau: ness of a temporary nature, and dined on i. afternoon with a party of friends at the Conserl Club, after which, in company with Mr. Ridley W man and Mr. Watts, two friends , residen t in St. •Jam to street, the unfortunate gentleman procee d e d to Vauao, Gardens, where he participat ed in the g aieties of t" royal property, during the evening appearing in e ° ,.. cthele deceasedlent health accompaniedan d spi spirits . After h A is fte f r rie p n a d r s tak to ing th o e f b su e p vi P il % i e dn r e e nt c hi t ye e d taoc G tt h a e l ef l ofe g r d y reosuc ne ndAd:rabtnsgd, the e t e bs r teai nirge aseraised inspecting wben hsbi discover h i s h o e ves : o;l s: fell to to be be i n n e s a e r n t s b i b e l e spot .A appliedme dica t l b e gentlem an lancet,bu but w ithout o h u s t p P a e v e, death having been instantaneous. The body was it-b-i; mediately removed, with all the privacy possible, to re ., Vauxhall Tap, adjoining the gardens, w here it wi ll t he main until after the inquest, which' Mr. Carter,._ ) „. coroner for Surrey, appointed to be held on Satucreooo3, The event caused some consternation among the,. who puny in the gardens. The friends of th e decessel,_ived were greatly excited at the awful occur rence, rec'tiop. from Mr. Wardell, the lessee, every possible atten_icie, Mr. Aspinall was a man of extraordinary stature•ra"; miring 6 feet 4 inches high, and weighing ofo c° 20 stone. He was in his 42d year. J a mes DEATH OF CARTER, THE LION KING.---.Mr• died C. Carter, known as the celebrated " _Lion King: o de!' Car te yesterday morning, at his reside nce, No 12. A' r ot street, Strand, of inflammation of the chest. was in his 35th year. He was born in Thor 71110 Gloucestershire, but passed the greater portion:000 life in the United States. He earned a wide ree no . in England, and on the continent, by his da ri ll ' ec tiott wonderful feats with lions, tigers, &C., a fine d f o r tb B of which animals he had recently purchase., Mr. purpose of again making his appearance in Carter has left a widow and a very large circle of 1 I to mourn his early sudden loss. -- Ws . H On the 17th inst., in Grove-t errace , lientish-toWv, William Reid, of a daughter. I Ito par' On the 17th inst., at Bridgwater , the wife of eons, Esq., of a son. , i ,., 4 1 ' of 11 On the 17th inst., at Woodford, Mrs. Henry Pit , '" — , daughter. go d ' On the 17th inst., at Cowes, the lady of W. C arter meister, M.D., surgeon to the Queen, of a daughter. cbris- On the 17th inst., at Deptford - lan e, Peckham, l'irti' topher Prince, of a daughter. last billt On the 17th inst., at Stanmore Lodge , Lower , Mrs. Herbert Dalton, of a son ____ MARRIED. e If li flr' n the 17th inst at t. Geor-the-Martn ° °l4ll lan e ' Mr O . W. K. Deane of Low S er Broug hton, Manchester( t° ' second daughter of Mr. Yates, of Bolton, Lancashire- — 'qr. ( 1 ' On the 17th inst., at John Kn ox's Church, Stepneiv " liter R. Basket t, of Newcastle-upon - Tyn e, to Christiana( dit of John Kirkaldy, of London. ._ ~,, C. °: On the 16th inst., at Edgbaston, near Birmingus.-, odes. Ccpe, Esq., of Harborrie, Staffordshire, to Sarah AO' daughter of the late Edward Rickards, Esq• the O n n, s ob , i t f l e te o l f 3 T th . IN i i n a s r t r ., iot a t t , EPsaqpp.ililEo.Hall, Leicestershire, ~,a rp rit On the 13th inst., at Bishopwearmonth, Durban', JJ third daughter of the late Charles Johnson, E!9- J. IVO* New -road, in-t., at York-grove, Peckham, Atr j • ''' 00 0 i l i s a t in h n i l t e ls rs t. m , i ll ti l l r . . James Hopkins, Studley' _ o fer On the 14th inst., in Montagu-place , Bryauston-540, the Rev. G. Capper, Vicar of Wherstead, Suffolk, aged 0 J• On the 15th inst., in Sloane-street, Lieutenant -Colon W. Roberdean, late of the Bengal Cavalry', aged 58; ' icV On the 15th inst., in Cadogan-placet of the late A. MiPherson. EN. ~,n Is r' On the 16th inst., at Vale House, Stoke-Nesvingv--, SyrnonP, Esq., aged 70. ----r!,-1 1111 --------- ..... ,„4 0 ... ~. Elizabetbi 0 Lonoon : ''.•lnted and nohow] by AIIIIIDO YOU 1170.::: I gen, ~ and. Prbi'..r. alit TAt Sum Office. N 0.112. Strand. 1 0 .* e _ f oo ' of the Savoy, in as County of ).11‘1411e202. 211011,14, • 1847. ✓ ' ,:i 8,873 2,588 4,470 6,852 9270 (311 A Lora St amps a 11 le Con 'eve ry Den, NI A cent: tall t!ged in b „,„,.. 1 13 , pen '"luce hi tree/ to 1 Nid ence Q aaneke r ate. of Una; .7...rtaicate wait § 44411 0r ' ttrcr t 0 be sur7 4ec uted bi T axes to — "Dna at top tii 1411-ErE 6,091 J