The Sun. — London, England, 1806-07-21 00:00:00

LAW REPORT. COURT OF' CHANCERY, jpty GURN'EY V. LONGNIAN AND OTHEItti The Plaintiff iS . a Short-hand Writer, the Defend antS.are,Booksellers. This was an application to the. Conti to obtain an .Injun'aion to prevent the sale o - a certain work, - entitled " The Trial of Henry Lord Viscount Melville," on the ground that t i ts Hoiise of Lords had prohibited every person from publishipg the Trial except their appointee, who was the Plain , tiff in this proceeding. , Messrs. PEUCI-VAL, FONBLANQUE, and LRACH, were he a 0 against the Injunction. The ATTOR NEY and SOLICITOR-GENERAL, and Mr. 1-101:LIST, in support of it : and Mr. PERCIVAL agant in re joinder. It is impossible to give in detail the particulars of this learned argument,which occupied the whole day; we shall therefore content ourselves with stating the short, pointS. The siort points made for the Defendants, with - the answers to them are the.followiner • • 0 • Difendants,l.—No InjUnc - tiou can be granted un til a Clear title to the publication- is shewn in the Plaintiff. No such title can be shewn'. If an issue were dire6ted on the right of the Plaintiff, and such Jight were found by 'the verdict, the Injunction miizb r• go. Plai::Wr.—The present is not a question of fair``, ,butmf law, 'and, therefdre, there is,. nothing 'to be tried by a Jury. All the faas necessary to the pur pose of the hijupaiDn are admitted in the affidavit of the Defendants. If an issue were to be tried be fore theihjtinaion waszranted, all the obje6f of the ai!thority of the Court, by a sumo ary interposition, must be lost. _ _ _ ,Defenthints f t),.---If the "House of Lords can give this exclusive right of publication, it is either found "eclon the rights of Courts in general, or on the pe `culiar privile , ,eS of the hereditary branch of the Le islature. If ,)n the latter, in a Court . of Equity no _procedings can be had to prote6t such privileges ; the Lords, have the means of guarding their own immunities, and will not permit the Courts below t ) irate; twe. - Plarntlf.—Tl)&interfrence of the : Court is no- Teessary to pr:vent injustice, because, if thy: House of Lords were to order . the. Defendants to be :nil prisoned for contempt, their confinement would give uo redres , ; to the Plaintiff. The case of - Bathurst v. Kearsley %hews that the Court will interfere - where 'the privileges of Parliament are immediately con . - corned. Defend ant. g, .3.--The -House of Lords has ?no authority to restrain the publication of the trial after judgment given, any rnore than any other Court has to restrain the publication of its proceedings ; and the aleglea of the exercise of this power of restric tion since thellevolution, is a proof that ii is not •Piaintill:-=--The right to restrain such publication is riot peculiar to the House; of Lords. It has been exercised (hiring a century,.even at. the Sessions held in the Old Bailey, where the Lord Mayor, for a• long period, received 1001. trout his nominee, for the ex clusive privilege of publishing the Sessions Paper, in - which the present Plaintiff was himself concerned. Defendants, 4.----The House of Lords has no pro perty in the trial ; and having no property, they can confer none upon the Plaintiff. • Rai - WWl—lt is not pretended that 'the House of Lords. has any such property, nor is .this property at ail necessary. to support the exclusive right of the nominee. Dyividants, 5.--The Plaintiff has a complete re , medy in a Court of LaW, and in such aCourt case a -of Equity will nut unnecessarily interpose, by in junaion, PlaintV—The redress would not be granted in a Court of Law, as a JurY would 614 give damages to the Plaintiff to the eonent of the profits arising - to the Defendants from the publi:azion. In - law no compensation would be, made to the Plaintiff for the 'loss sustained by Idm, by this premature gratification of public curiosity, and the consequent diminution of the ,sale.of his work. ~ D efendants, 6.—The detriment arising from this power of the Lords would be, that in bad times, they, might nominate. a person who Would .mis-state the testimony on which the accused was-convicted or acquitted, and thus the most innocent might be con-, deemed; and the most profligate might be declared guiltless,•and the public remain in total darkness on toe proceedings: • Constitution has thotight fit to :confide this power of nomination to the Supreme Court of the kingdom, judging it might be more sate to entrust this power in such hands, than on such soleMn occaiions to incur the risk of inaccuracy from the ordinary channels of publication. . . Dcfendants,_7.The Lords are not bAnd to no minate, and no :anointment was made in the case of Hastings : if they do nominate, the appointee is under no obligation to publish, and if he do not, no account. of these grave proceedings would apPear. at all. the LOrds do. not nominate, the publication 111 Cie world. If they-4o no minate, and the appoillte. 7 ; iiCt ezpploy due and re:tonable dilig:7Llce, others may disclose the 'pFo 7 . with irnpun;ty, so that in neither case the information wohlroe withheld from the public. - Defendants, 8.--Tne right of nomination in such • a case would, be more safe in the hands-of the King than of the Lords, because the Sovereign of.the State may, by his Minister, be made responsible -for mis coudud, when the Lords cannot, because they, are the ultimate judges of their own privileges. . . Plaintiff-1 he question is; what is the constitu tion of this High Court, of Parliament, and not how that constitution, May be improved by any restrictions on its acknowledged immunities. Such were the principal questions,. and the, cases relied upon were these : Bathurst - and Kearsley, on the publication of the trial-of the Duchess of King ston ; Mamby and Owen argued iu 1755, by Lord Mansfield, then AttorneyGcneral ; Currey and Wa lter in Bth Term Reports, in which,Mr. s,stiee Law rence Observed on the great importanceof giving pub-, licity to judicial proceedings ; a case in carter, 89, )•?speiSting Abridgmentand the great literary cause of Tayler and Miller, 4 ,Burr. 2311.3, 2417, on the case for publishing Thomson's Seas Ons, ,whereby the Plaintiff was depri v 0 of the sale of 100 . 0 .coples. LONDUN : Printed by RICHARD ItARRIS, of Ng. 4 , Martlett -court, Hwy reet 3114, At the SiTN - OFFICE, NO. i3:', Strand xideerticintents Order y • - • • .1 tY . tlll - 5&10`, tlfe LOttb CitAST'ett.t.ott olv.erved,:,fiv,e , qiestions were submitted to the Judges; and of the! Ist questiciti of the 11 judges. 8 to' 3 were for the' Kaintif; on the Second '7 to 4 . ; on tile:third to. 6;, on the fourth 7tb 4 ; and on the fifth to 6.. (Lord . Mansfield. did not ,speak, froM motives of delicacy,, in support of his-own judl2, - me . In cite replies:we have given to the propositions on the part of the Defendants, we have stated t h e nega tive grounds on Which the injunction was snpPorted ; the positive arguments were also adduced, and itwas 'said by the Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff,' that, although 'the Star Chamber' Was destri,yeti,. and the -Licensing Ad was abrogated, yet that some chdck was preserved by -the prudence at e me ancestors: Thus the Stalutes, which instal& the Public in the Laws of Man; the Bible., whiclvinforms him of the Laws of God, and even Lilly's Grammar, for the correelness and purity of juvenile education, were in the hands of the King's Printer. The corredluess of the publication was more material. than . even publi city itself, and the Learned. Counsel, in one of the concluding pages of this work, pointed out some er roneous paragraphs as to material fads. The oppo l sets of this injun&ion stood upon the liberty of the press, and-upon subjects of general theory and popu lar declamation; none of which weree - referable to the dry .question before the Cou'rt 'Mr. PERCIVAL, in rejoinder, observed, that it was most singular; that the Sessinns at the Old - Bailey . I should be set up as a rule for the House of Peers, and that, because the Lord Mayor received lOoi. for giving a seat to a short-hand-writer, tut argument was to be supplied for this nomination, The Learned Judges of Courts would now discover a • new source ,• of emolument, and sell the right of reporting in their Courts : • and the Lord Chancellor:, himself . might add -this scheme of, profit to the other advan-' tages of his high station. If the Judges ,possessed such a right of restriction, there must -ben duty corn ; mensurate With this right, and instead - of being the, most Ore and upright men, they would be the • most criminally 'negligent, for the utter neglect of this-duty, deemed 'to be so sacred and imporant.. The non-user WAS . conclusive of the non-exigence of any such right. .The argument in-favour of this exclusive right, founded on the .necessity of ,correelneSS; disappeared, when we attended to other cases. Notlung could he of more consequence to .the individual or Co the public, than what daily oc curred in the Newspapef, affecting the fortune, re, putation, liberty, and life of the subject ; and yet no restriEtions weru imposed ; the most free and un reserved communication was permitted of all that passed in our judicial proceedings, from the Court of Piepoudre to - the court coi-anz ipso rege, the:supreme Court ot• Common Law in the kingdom, On all the grounds stated, the Learned Coutisei trusted that his Lordship would be of opinion, that an issue ought to be direded, and that the Injunction should not be granted. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, it was impossible to •distinguish this case from that of Bathurst v, Kearsley, and he confessed, that if it had not been' for the sanction of that precedent he should not have ranted, in the first instance, the Injunction. He was Counsel in the case of Bruce v. Bruce, which invoi v eds a question - between :the King's English and Scottish Printers, and in that case LordanoN granted an in junaion.; and the same had bee;:. decided by Sir Jo 'SEP!! JEKYL, Master of the 1t(.9115, who granted an injunttion until the hearing of the cause. If there were any difficulty about the faCts, he would no,t go even thus far, but every thing necessary was admitted 'in the affidavit of the Defendants. It' he Lords as sumed to be- the judges of their own privileges, it should be remembered, that they were, assisted 'by per Sons who had filled theinost eminent situations in the law, and who were afterwards placed on the bench' for their distinguished talents. The 'liberty of the press, as it existed in England, would • - not be tit all affeded by this decision; it was a quest .ti,on on the privileges of the Lords; birt if it in the •satillest degree infringed upon the other, no man would be more jealous than he should be of such an encroachment, as no man felt a', more profound re verence for its freedom; and no man Was more soli oitouslor its preservation. His - Lordship concluded with • noticing 'all the cases in which the Lords had assumed this right of appointment since the. lievolu tion, recititig, as lie proceeded, the very words ern ployed in the cases of the Earl of Oxford, of the • Ettrl of Macclesfield, Lord Lovat, Lord Ferrers, Lord Byron, the Dttchess of Kingston, and Warren HaSt i, logs. s The injnaCtion .waS,then ordered until the hearing of the cause. '• COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, juLy t 9. ITULLb V. BLYTIIE. This was.an aaion to recover Gal. under ; the fol lowing Ciretunstances. 7 The Plaintiff, a farmer, placed bills, to the amount of f 8 II: in the hands of the Defendant, a linen-dealer in the City of London, for, the purpose 'of getting them discounted. The Defendant, not causing to advance ready money, offered to give goods of the value of the bills, which the Plaintiff agreed.to take, relying on the word of the Defendant respeding the value of them. When the goods were sold by audion soon after, they proved to be worth no more than I.lsl. consequently the Plaintiff lost the difference between the value of the bills and the goods in, question. MANSFIELD observed generally, that if a trader sc,+.4 goods to a person ignorant of the value of them, and they proved not worth the money given, it was a gross he, however, left the queStion with the Jury; to decide whether it was a bona jide transaction ; intimating at the same time, that it was not, like 'a bargain between two linen dealers, who knew the value of the article :.it was between a farmer, ignorant of the commodity,. and a trader.—The Jury, without hesitation, found a ver di& for the PlaintE This verdi& will'tend to the discontinuance of a pradice prevalent amongst money-lenders, of "foist ing- orlon their necessitous clients articles of tiler- Chandize freqUently not worth a tythe of their nomi— nal value. Saturday two, young women were committed from the Public Office, Shadweli, for stealing , quantity of curtains' and wearing apparel from a 1 public-house in that neighbourhood ; as were two other women, for robbing a seaman of a sum of money. Fl Gm the 4f — OitTD . ' CIN 18O(. St. James's, July 14, 7306: The King has been pleased to, appoint Henry Notton ' Wil;ij, Esq. urbe Comptroller and Pay rnater to the Establishment of Htr Royal High= ness the Princess Charlotte of Wales. ". 4 '" BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED:: . . • Francis Drake, of Plymontit; baker, from Ittly'ts to Au gust 18, at ten, at Guildhall, Lon:ion. _ . BANKRUPTCY SUPERS ET)EL). Henry Rayson, of Liverpool, droOst. ~'= eltrnsi_o'"•4tit, 1 1- • •• S tti#l l 4 l , l l B l Olen , ! Vifcll6ll, warner, d. Hargrave, I. Marrfalr - T Pollard, and I. COoper, seven lamp-lighterS4n the trviej 7 of-the Proprietors - niitlYanxhalt4.--:ardens,.. -- were.charied before.: the S9uthw:irk Magistrates . with stealing oil troin their employers , The theft was fully established ; and the' Magistrates ednceiying it to he a transporuble `fence, were'Abourto commit theta-for trial ; 'nut, at the reqw , st-ot the Proprietors of ,the Gardens, they \‘'i - ere allowed to enter the Navy,; . and they were aga. conlingly sent cn board the Ten:ler. Saturday J. Lind ay; Alias Hari is; -- Was examined ,at Union charged with robbing Lieut. GRlP .rmis, of the Navy, of his picket-book, containing 151. in bank-notes, & - c. The book was found in his y OsseKon, but Lieut. having joined his ship, which is under sailing ,orders, the Prisoner was committed to the next ‘tuarter Sessions as a reputed thief, upon the oath of two Mice Officers. ,SaturdaY a young woman was fUlly committ e d -for-trial-froni the,Office in Queen-squarei for break -big into the back part of ,a house at .Pimlico, and stealing a quantity . of linen which was hanging to dry. Some of it was traced to the places at whith she had 'sbid it: •.. 'When disbrders ; of the most malignant nature have :either from hereditary. causes, the luxury or dissipation of the age, crelit as it were involuntarily into cur frame,' it is of the utmost importance, to tiliSe. afflicted With them to know where to meet ,with- a permanent •and radical' cure. This having long, been t 1 ohjeEt of Dr. SOLOMAN,, of Gilead- House, near Liverpool, he has at lengthcousented to make public his Anti-Impetigines, a Medicine -founded- on a chemical and philosophical basis, for the-wure of the Scurvy, King's Evil, ,ekc. arc. and which .he has administered during a long course of private practice with the 'most comple,te arld never tailing success, in the most obStinate cakes. The powers of thy medicine are of the most gentle and invigorating nature, gradually cleansing the blood from every impurity, and restoring the pa,- tient to- his pristine healLi, when every other has entirely, failed, as rnay:_tie ful)y seen in. the pain 01ets delivered gratis, by . all.* Venders in most •.1,4:, , - • • towns. . • S.1:11P I V 1 • go Loi,' ty Arrived -the John ; ' froni.Newroundiand ; BEnevo. lenr, Haftlett, faint LiverpoeerNetvh6fie. MAnelaws, from Souttiatnpton ; and ' Bromleyoroin London. Sailed-tile Dart, Harland, Lark, Spurri e r, an.t Adive,, Williams, I . oP..trtsmour.ti t ; Aittiv,e, lirovva, Or:Southamp, ton ; I adust.,, Itird, for Lonslon ; P,incess Royal, Moore, for Rochester; Good Intent, Thatettell, - and Ann,•Thilto way , fc,t; c1 ) (7 i 44.; A miry,. Kind, jot 1.1411•; and Wii tiara and Mary; Lin Torllrighton. `6 - ..tt*VrSEND, JULY 18. Passed S hy—the freinde F(eyief. from Saloe ; Neptune, Kehl, front Gieeiilailki kesoiution, Cork, :inci ,‘ • Uu t)ttrius;_•Httnsim, t,c,tn Nqrw.y. Sailed-the l' arnti:ac ;lean, lur New Sokth,Wal, 4 - ; a l d -Comineree, 7 Walker, fur •• ' 81it.'1,3 1 . - .---- 4 ~ - • i - :, • - 1 On Friday last, at C=ain's_ call, in Tluntingc.onshire,. the Lady ot'SwL.faint.3.litinerly, nia Damg4ltsy. ' . ... • i on Saturday, the Lady of Mr. Horatio Robson, Piccadil» i ly, °fa Daughter -, — , " • . . 1 _f:V9ftikc _Altlktitt3 , .•..the Lady of Colonel G y i t li e , o f t h ! b t l i i, 11 - 17egniT tli:irdS. - of a Daughter: Alillzu IL , al On gittlrdijy; at Lewisham._ Kent, Al. F. riornmey, -Ot.Cliwatton, Alts 6 tieury , ut Syttetib.inti daugliter•otihe ; late DavAi ~ . - 1 ,,.., . . `-. r . ,; , Eff..., . t . DIED. s 4 0a T ht)r sday;% it his scat at- Tit - at - nes Dittdn, Surrey, -Sir Ilic;,!,1:1 Josephi Sullivau, Bart. M. Y. for S ea t on t. •-• • 1 ,4. 1 Yesterik.iy ni ,r.iing,• Mr. John 13igseistait; Vestry Cljric 1 - of titis'ariStrot Iblington. • , A tcwtjaysago, at Worcester, M ar i a , .I.vife,of.Theophihas Patterson, Esq. K. M. daughter of Alexander Ru(4 4 - E. of Cooilatn, Surrey. i., . .. . )L4NKI UP IS. lohn Fielding and William Walker, 'vite .of. Nicholas-l: ne, Liendon, ship and insura&e-brokers and co - -partncrs, suy " —• . . render I uly 22, Au4,ist z ; and 3;0, o-a ten, at Gullditall. Attorney, ,Mr. lxiarrand. Castle court, Budge-row. Barker Chitlney late ot Ltverpool, and of . King-street, Co vemt-c;arden, %licitilcsex, patent soap-tnanuttorer, to surj render July 26, August 2.; and 30, at ten,- at Guildii,dl. . . , Attornies, Messrs: Blae and. klin .. ae... EsseX-street, Strand. Thomas !)e.lap, of Bart n-u poll- Hu 111 '. er, Lincolushiro, shop keeper, to surrender August 7, ,:t one; ',`, .at tot; anti 3,, at two, at the George Hut, liart,!n-upon , ltuniller. At- tornies, Messrs. Marris and Brown, Liarton upon-Hum ber. Thomas Massey, of Manchester, eott\ln 'and twist-dealer, to sum nder August t i, 12,-and 30, at eleven, at the Co4li and Horses, Manchester. ttorno;s, Messrs. Foulkes :Ind Manchester or Messrs. Foulkes and ray's-1 on, London. `lsaac Newton, of Manchester, cotton inanufaa, r?r, to stir render • August t t, 12, and 3c, at tiir;:t., at the W,ute Lion Arlandiester. Atiorbies, Mr. R,ilph llts, Cursit4r: street .; or Mr. Robert Wife, Mancheater, Thomas ‘V6tlake, of lilytii,uth-DoCk, draper, to surrender July z 6, at ten; 29, ;trict August 30, at rluveim, .at Gilitth Low.on. Attorney, Mr. Laton, 13 , rentit-Jane., Henry Shepard, late 91 .ge, initt,ir 7 rner- Ciaant, to surrender july 2z,, 29, at one, anti August 3,, at. ten, at Guildhall, London. Attornies, M.! ,r 3 Son, and Holtaway, Southanipton-buildiu6s, Chancery_ lane,. London ; or Mr. Sharp, Cambridge. 1/11)ENDS Auglist 22. {slues Graham, late of Mildenh.4ll, anti since of Stoke next Nayland, Sutflik, hair-merchant, at e;eVC4I . -the, Hell' lnn, August tz. George Ormrod, of Manchester, dyer, at eleven, at the Dog TaVerp,-Deanbgate, Manchester. , • • CER I IFICdrES. August 9. John Whisley Ayres, of liadleigh, SuMIT:, shop keeper. Thomas Charlton, pt Eccles, Lancashire, innkeeper. William Thomson; late of Thro t ;morton-street, London, stock-broker. ,William M.ison, now orlate of Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, plumb .t George Sheldon, late of Manchester, dealer in cotton twist. William Rawsthorn, of Sharpies, Lancabhire,. dealer in - cattle. Edward Sims, of Du!slcy, Gloucestershire., corn•non.brewer. Henry Va ,ghan - and 'lticnard Vaughan, of Livecpuol, grocers and co-p.rtnerc A Manuscript, dug out of Herculaneum; has late ly ly'en unrolled, and foUnd to..bethe fragment of a Latin Poem in Hexameters, containing nearly 70. verses. . They relate .to the battle of 6.-.tiana, and, it is. supposed, to the death of , CLEotwrtiA'. The Ma nuscript is written in" uncial )(,..tters, and is expected to prove the Poem Of VARIUS,AIIe i c riella 012 1 - 1.0 RACE and - ' ' It is a curious, fait - not generally known, that the Tomb of QUEEN CATHERINE PARR :was lately,o_pek ed, and the body and feet found as perteaand beart titial as . on the day she died. • It appeared . i<• the body had been embalm.edand coaled with wax, and several men of science are, now engaged inn-discover-- in- t' the,eXaeinature of the preparation. 0- A'curious ancient Mainiscript is now in the, pew session of the Rev;Mr:MH.:Nna,wheseexistenceand history- have been traced to th - etintc.lo(4.( • :l7l-I.B7ERT, of Durham,: who died in the. tith century ; conse quently it must be more than i2oo,,years old. , The existence of this Manuscript, add : tile partienlars, : of the funeral of ST.. CUTHEE are contained iu ado • cument in the archives of the Antiquarian Society, in which the secret r6,4ative to. his incerru:-.nt. said. to be entrusted to three Friars, at the deAth Of one of whom, it is•to be entrusted to another, and thus transmitted to the latest posterity, but is always to be known only by Three Friars. The Roman (Ala raaers of the above Manuscript are all in capital let ters. . . In the Bissauk Island, .on the Western Coast of Africa, the succession to the Throne is regulAted in, the following extraordinary . manner :—Four of the strongest Noblemen carry the body of the deceased King to the grave, on reachig which they toss„ the bier in .the air, and thus propel the . body. several times, till at last they let it fall on the grandees, who have prostrated themselves on the earth, and-"the person on Whom the royal body . rests, is itpme diktely proclaimed From the. arrangements, ‘.7 hoever,• that ere made, the election cannot fall lipon'any but a MeMber of the Royal FaMily; that is, one of the sons, brothers, or nephews of the de i = ceased. The successful candidate is inftediately proclaimed, 'and . ,has. the diadem encircled on his royal bi f ow, which is' two folds of rope twisted round his forehead:" ' On Monday an Inquisition was - taken before the Coroner of Great Yarmouth, on the bodies of two young women, and the verdia was—Found Drow4ed. The circumstances attending their death were must extraordinary: They had determined.on committing the fash n un the night of tile preceding' Saturday, when one,of thorn, about nine o'clock, went to her room and burnt_ her letters. On Sunday Morning they Went to the beach; tied themselves together by the wrists with ribbons, and walked, deliberately into the sea. They were.married Women, - and a quarrel with their' husbands (privates. in the Shropshire .L Mi litia), is supposed to have been the cause of their putting an end to their lives. Saturday a Coroner's Inquest was held at the Half-way-house; on the Commercial Road, on the body.of J.. Rutherford, belonging to the ship Hurl ley, of North Shields, who fell from the main chains into the Pool, by which he was drowned. Verdict, '" Died by Drowning." An Inquest was also held - at the same. house , on the body.of J, Maynard, who was found droWned in a gravel-pit in Stepney-fields, in which he precipi tated himself with a view to bathe.—Verdict', " Accidental Death." On Friday,_ as of. IVVecross-street, and another Geptlem:n were angling in the river Lea, near Hackney, t::ey perceived a smart young woman walking acrcss a .field at' some distance from them, and thiow he'rself into the,watee. By ,great exeitions they prevented her from drowning but she refused to disclose her name, and lamented. that 'She had not executed her rash design. It was after wards discovered that she was the daughter of a re speelable tradesman in. Bishopsptc-street. jbilStled b) I. LIAM ARMtOLR ICR UPS, Of 13outh 1 NI stteet, Grosvenor-square for-the Paps-, Leath fig the Editor, &c. ost-paid), must be addressed. PR-ICE OF STOCKS SATURDAY.. • India Stock, 'VI ex. (lir. Iritha Kinds, is. South Sea Stork; '— New ; Exclicci Bilis, par, Is. 1 ) 11 m l p n e i r u ki m l i 3 6 pe per lent. Ditto Anti. 8 Coils. ter 24111 july, 63 Bank Strek, ►wavy 5 pet ceht. g 43 5 per Cent. 1 : 7 9 7, . Insn . 5 per Cent. 4 pet (eni. 8t 411 , - 3 per Cent. ked• 6z 3 per :gent. Cen' Ca§ ozi Bank L.'Ann. 17 13 16tits I Ditto'Short Ann. i 7:l6tlis / • i N ,) 'F? ot I(i t i v C et i .4 l. Men. f Educa s tioi t i en an b d V y the selettion of a pe.,ulia branch, the sanaion of long con tinued success, is the- best criterligt G: superiority..: • [right years have I devetzd my practice to the exclusive treatment of Three I )Is.rders, :ad the successful result of rov plan gitieS n 1 additional 'tat , .r to oppose, tar as Ipm able', the ravages of those Complaints which are the mast important in the Cattlogue 4,t Hunan I intimates.. After initiation into every Branch, as an Army Surgeon, t formed 'a wish at •ao early. - period of Practice to rescue in lividuais from the ign,rance of uneducated men, or tfte -equally ciangerons precipitancy , At.gene;al Pratliti6ners. Three I)isoiders, to the Cure which 1 have de ,voted toy attentit;ii,' comptise 'every species of V E:vl:- ki Al. I N i.• I( N, whether of a recent. or long du.. ration: .t (fly; All ~.,kinds whether arising from the - habits 'of school .hoys, f or CAI:: iudillgcnces of mary t o . age: Aid,. lastly, tact deratKenr.-:It of the system in tivo menwhici i s k. ; a lel BA i( N N ,cr S f 1.1 TY. hltirl:erous.. , l:;tisse 17 , toe icsult or ignorance, (.4 haste in the treat;oent"4 sutiOeGoin , ranea ; and it not frequently happens - that trle see,ls of Life arr the inthscret :QM unguared,flour.-Ity a superior:the thod such Com.:)lanys at ea:;; 'O. cured; and, even `where others ha r ve faLil, that I 'may presume to oiler a • radical re-establishrient. Feat', hisivever, are;the.cases of coinplicated: distress in this - ‘lisorder,...compaled.willi t calatrittou's situations of Men, who, tcOin an in a solitary vice i or jlio prevaint gaieties °lf' a tasino!ible life, acquire th at State of DcbilitYv hicitras the.ithavoiclable consequence .of such pernicious Where tiie Mutappy 5i.211 - erer . broods over his misety,• but carefully conceals his • nlistortnne,- inay be some conso latior.'fbr: hint to •know„ that although; it be an object 01 doubt oi.tuicertainty.with the removal of theca Perlclt.o,..ie, t:;,:.giailual progress of kenova non, is the acquire;rient et any Extierience. It the ri t es of Li4echus: or Venus have begzi to %lit:cc lielanly , vigaur, much anxiety ,twill be prevent - 4,J by an early ' Ctiunterac. lien bi this' lairoid State ; aid *in these cases, no great difficulty 'Will Occur. But toner; this Deficiency has for years existed, a proper persevcrance is sindispensabiv equisite to revive the ithirtt bering Sparks of. Life, and to ie.:anitnaie the Constuntion. - MARI 4 .I El) WOM EN, who have long been disappointed in their expectations of a Family, ma,. be aEsurcd, , •that in most instances, such defeds, are curable by Mai-teal The secrecy which is so essential to my undertaking. ..nd the qualifications which 1 have presumed to state, - ',form the basis of my prztensions, and in coincidence, with such this •inrimation is given, that" Mr. Bree maw be consulted personally, Or by Letters (inelosing a small Notei, at his house, N0...a9, Arun&l street, Strand, near Temple Bar, t p - ' There is an additional .Entrance in Water-stieet. adjoinirg, and the Name is ant) uth the doors. - Martin }sree. Member of the Royal Coileve of Slime",•'s.