The Sun. — London, England, 1817-12-03 00:00:00

, - Bronx the LONDON GAZETTE, DEC. 2. [This Gazette routnitis Addresses of Condo knee to the PRINCE REGENT froni the Pres hyrery of Dumferinline, the Towosi t ip of Stour to.id;,e and pArish of Olds%Tinford, the Corporation of Waterford, the Corporation of the City of York, the Borough of Burton-upon-Trent, the Borough of Carnarvon, the Borough of. naccles field, and the Corporation of Kingston-upon- Thames. Also Addresses to Prince LEoPoLo from the Borough of Pot tsmOtith, the Presbytery 'of Ayr, the Borough of Tewkesbury, and the Town of BirotinOtam ; to which most respectful A , t , :wers vrere returned in the name of his Serene Dighness by Sir RoßEltr GARDINER • , B.ktiKlZ Thornton Eleat'ii, Croydon, clottti(7, to surren.: der D'c. 18.,..4t one, Attor- iter, Mt, I 1: Carpenter, Chttrclveviissage-, Old Jewry. W. liatlt, EQlter Surrey, rictualter, Dec. 9, at tirte. 16, at Attorn?cs, twelve, and 'Jan. 1.3, at 'lino, at Gull:011;in. Messrs. Edwards and Lyon, BloornAtti y-Square S. Kirk, Led alehouse-keeper, Dec. 12, IS, and Jan. 13, at eiett-ti, at the o.urt-tionse, Leeds. Attorney, Mr. It. Batt , ye, Chancery-tat-ie. B. Steele, Bristol, druggist, Dec. 9, at eleven, 16, at ten, and at el e tPit, at Gnitilhail. Attortlies, Messrs. I),..arce ;wit S',ltt, St. Swithip's-lane. . • 11"ade, Holland-street, Oxford-street, hater, Dec. 9, 16, altli .1:tfl. 13, at teu, at Gniitltrali. Attorney, Mr. Arundel!, . • , . It &Aim!, isioney-scricener, Dec. 6, i ,acid Jan. 13, at eleven, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Stiaw and Stevens, Staple Inn. , DIVIDENDS. Dec. 23, L 'Metcalf and C. H. Kauffmann, New London er,: t, Centcht4l-friars, mcrchantc-Dec. 23, N. Demeze, /-I;ettle-Witney, Southampton, innkeeper--Dec.• 23, W. I[l , -,i;71), Halifax, grocer--Dec. 27, W. Law, Copthall hot Throgwortuu-street, merchant—Dec. 27, R. Davies, Bend-sti eet, tallow-chandler—Dec. 23, B. 'Thompson, Nuon.Veett, Peckham, farmer—Dec. 22, J. Cowie, Warn for.l-com t, merchant—Dec..i3, W. Beak, Bishops-Hatfield, Ifertfordshire, innholder—Dec. 30, .A.- Scott, West Smith field, hardware-merchant—Dec.3o, S. Brown, Sh a d 'TtYtmei, near Dtyck-,hea6, rictiallcr—Jan. 3, J. Burgess, EtifiL4d-wash,, Enfield, thal'st‘er—Dei.... 23, It. W. S . beppard,'AbLertuaitbury,, Black welt-Hall -faetOr—Dec. 23, J.Gale, New London-street,. Crutelied,fri ars, :rue.rchaut,—Dec. 24, A. Dalguirns,.lt. lit•uc,: an 4 J. ilridge. Livert , ool, merchants—Dec.'23, J'. t'in't, Red Lion- , ,term, Holtturn, ironmongef—DeC. IV, B. Coll !en, lit- sbnitsgate -Street, merchant—fc.-2.1, J.Adlington, Cheste,r-f 6etcl; diaper—Dec. 1:3,: W. Brock, Warnford-court, Tliore... ntort.on-street, merchant—Dec. 13, G. and ti..llol)ilison, Pa tt•rnostet-6,w, bookselter's3—DeC. 23; M: Abrahams, Mina-, • ries, merchant—D t merchant—Dec. 93, J. heyney. Oxford-street, linen draper—Dec. 23, 11. F, Horneman, Queen-street, Cht.apsi4, merchant—Dec. 23, M. Levy, Minories, merchant. CERTIFICATES. Mc. 23. .. :t Rainsboltont and T. Potter, Norivich, dYers—J. Snlith, Nlihrii next Sittinghourne, Kent, rope-maker—J. William Tooley•street, Southwark, pl tim her—R. Jackson, Stockport, rltil , -srist —3. Withers, Bristol, hat-roannfactorer—J, Aldred,: (.71fer-rsev, Surrey, grocir—T. Nlaish, Bristol, cheese-factor-- I'. 1-Inii, jun. Evesionn and Gosport, grocer—F. Zergvlar, Alverstoke, Sonthatnuton, victualler. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVE-D. W. and .1. Hare', Cannon-street, carpet-warehousemen— W. Edwnrds a,nd flachnev, shoentakeys—G. Mel moth and J. Synies jun. Sherhorne, Dorsetshire, tnalt.ters— W. and .1. Walker, Palttnalt-court, Wi.stntinster, army and nary Br.,Wn ansi J, Davis, Nailswortlt, Glonces, terittire, Conden and W. FlAnagan, Wells-Stret-t, Oxford-street, carpenters—W, Mitchell, W. BOttontley, jun: and T. Dixon, A3illuail, Litnehouse, shipwrights. MIDDLESEX 'ESSIONS, DEC. 2. FRAUIL-LONG V. COUSINS. • • The tieffndant, Robert Cousins, was put to the bAr nn-an iwlietment chargine. him with fraud,- leintly olitaining a check for 501. from Mr. John • Long, the proprietor of Long's Hotel, Bond - street, under the folk , viog, circumstances the month of June, 1816, the prisoner calkd noon the prosecnfar, anti informed him that his (the pioseenToF's) nephew was hirested, and con fined in a lock-up-lionSe in Carey -street, Loi coin's Inn'-fields, and that he had requested him. to and inform . the prosecutor of it ; at the same time observing, lte•could obtain his discharge for 50/. The'proscCutor accordingly gave hint' a check for that stint on his banker. In about two hours after the prisoner returned; and said that the 501. would not be ehough, and that he mast have a hundred. The prosecutor accord ingly wrote another check for that sum, and re- tiotsted to he put in possession of the previous check for 50/. but was informed by the prisoner that be had torn it to pieces, and thrown it away. From circumstances that transpired, the prosecutor obtained pOssession of the check for one bombed poun:ls, but was assured, in the most positive manner; that the first check had been de• stroyed. The prisoner afterwards took the benefit of the Insolvent Debtors' Act, and was opposdd by the nephew on account of some transactions bet wren them, but discharged. On the clay t welvemonth after the bill was drawn, it was pre sented to the banker, and cash received for it. A warrant was immediately issued, and .the,defend ant talt.en into custody, when he acknowledged baying got the money-for the bill: Mr. ALLEY, 011 the part of the prisoner, took an objection to the indictment on the ground that the cheek not -having- been paid to a third person, 1V49 of no more value thaua blank piece of paper, .but ti,e,Court over-ruled it,. Messrs. John and Joseph Long.were then.called, who proved the fac.s 'above stated bitter : Geti . tleman ((eclat-lug Gat be ban never authorised the pri,oner to apply to his uncle in his . behaff, nor had he, the prisoner, beets in any manner ac cessary to his (Lischarge. Mr.. ALLEY at great„leneb cross-examined the witnesses. acid a . ddresse . d the Jury in the prisoner's htinalf. lie called two persons to give him a character, one of whom had known him two years and a half, and considered him to have, been a 'strictly honest character. - • The Jury, after ceinsulting a taw. minutes, re turned a.verdict Mr. WATSON, .Cbairman„.• 'after ftling the opinion of the Bench, adtkessed the prisoner .as follows :—" Yon, thiliert'Cousins, have been,in .dicted for a fraud, : a.vd_ by, I am sure, as attentive a Jury as es'er sat in. that box, Who have found it their duty t4i -retnra, "a verdict of Guilty against you.. It is theref`ore the Imperative duty of this Count, on:the' behalf_ of the public, however pain ful it , :May be.froui the variety of the chsum staaces developed, and the great 4eceit with which yon isaye acted, von having" harlpnieed in your tor.a r:wel vymonth... the crime of which you hAve heel' convktej, to pass an exemplary sentence 'on you. The sentence of (he Court therefore on you is, that you he transported beyond the seas I fur the term of seven years." LAW INTELLIGENCE. eiOURT 6F• RING'S BENCH,. PARKER V. LEE. This was an action for a Bill of.Excliange; • ac cepted by the defendant for 3091.. ' • The hand-writing of the defendant being proved as acceptor, Mr. bEsmAN, far tlidefendant; stated., that the defendant, Mr. Lee, was a very thoughtless young man, Of considerable expectations, and the plain tiff a very prudent old ma's. The bill in question was an accommodation bill, for which the delen r dant had received no value, but which Mr. Parker had discounted, he vein;; a person who loved to mane his money as productive is possible. At the time the bill becatne due, there, were other trans, actions bet wren Mr. Parker, the plaintiff, and defendant. In short, Mr. Parker held two warrants of attorney for 7001 of the defendant, and his Attorney, Mr. Varman, had sent to settle the ac;• count. Mr. Parker accordingly received the ac count of what was due from Mr. Lee, and-at the bottom of that account he inserted the present bill of exchange. Mr. Vattnan inquired of him what the bill meant. Mr. Parker said, that it.was a bill which Mr. Lee had accepted, but that he did not hold him at all responsible for it, as he had ,other securities for it, a Major's word, and a war 'rant of attorney from an Irish Baronet. ;Upon this assurance Mr. Yatman - paid off the „warrant of attorney. This converSation, Mr.'• Denman said, he apprehended, amounted to a renunciation by the plaintiff of the liability of the defendant as an acceptor. Afterwards, however, Mr. Parker said, he had not been paid by the. other parties, and that he should resort to the defendant .as'ac- • „ ceptor.. • The Court held that he bad not ,inlerms-re'=. flounced the• liability of the.acceptor, and that be was entitled to recover the sum tor which he held the bill, namely, 1681. and a verdict- was taken fOr that sum. THE KING V. CANE. This was proecution for an . assault. The .rirosecAtnr was a tahnuring man, •and the defend lint Was a gentleman occupying land at Ester, 16 Middlesex J an.§ 'rooky said .he bad been once in the.ser-- ilde ( - ,f'Mr.'.l:boaras C.lne,ihe defendant. .011 the 27th of as! lie was returning from Norwood Church,lre. and others saw a water-rat on the bilks of a ditch in Mr. Cane's grotinds.—the wit 7. ness-took up a stout, - and threw it at the rat. Mr. Cane was at spine little distance; he came up to the - witness, and said h e wns t. go a l ong w i t l i at the. same -time he laid hold of him by the col tar, dragged him to his front gate, and struck Witness several times over the head with a stick. He said before the week was out, he would lipng twa or . three of them on the Green, and'eharged witness with being one of those who stOle bis - Pigs• Lord t..I.ENBOROUGH said the Assault .was fully. provt4, and ihe defendant must be found guilty ; but it was to be hoped that lie would make such compensation to Ow prosecutor.; •:ts,ta rentler. it unnecessary to Ming hint befarg.tileJcvuragain., Verdict, Guilty. r'! - . COURT OF CONINION4I,EINS, Dec. 2; STACEY V. SIR HENRY WILSON'. The Plaintiff, who keeps he K.lll's Head pub lic-house, in St. Paul's Cliuteh.yard, brought his action against Sir Heury. Wilson, to recover' 71. 7s. 2d for meat and drink supplied to several persons who had %otes for the Borough Of Bar;- staple. It occurred to the defendant, that a vft- eancy 'night happen in the representation' of the Borough► of Barnstaple; awl ►hat a-new Member niigt►t be elected in lieu of Sir Eyre Conte. It was consequently his intention to stand a contest for the said Borough, and be authorised a person named Stanhury, to act as his agent, and do all that was necessary ►o advance his interest. Stan bury, tinder such authori:y, selected the plaintiff's house as a proper place for the reception of voters.. On the 3►f of January, a supper was given at the plaintiff's house to 70 or 80 persons, and Sir. Henry Wilson was the President. The bill, amounting to 301., was. immediately discharged.. Mr. Stacey we►►t on- providing the voters with re.-- freshmeitts,•until the demand accrued which this action was brought to recover. Mr. Serjeant BEST described his Client, Sir H. Wilson, to be a man of large property, but, he added, if " his fortune was equal to the National Debt, and he were to leave the Barnstaple voters whofreqiented the plaintiff 's house to drink at his expence, they would swallow it all. They ought to be called voters of the borough of Guzzle down." It was true, he said, that Sir Henry Wiisonlntended to offer hinisell as a candidate for the horMigh of Barnstaple, but he was desirous of coming in by the assistance of respectable per sons, and not by men who did nothing without hard.drinking. Finding no bottom to the throats of the 111 rll who met at !Stacey's house, he_ was obliged to put an end it, it. He therefore sent Captain Clarke, an Officer in the Navy, to inform the plaintiff that he revoked the order given for styplying• the voters with meat and drink, and that he would pay for no more in future. ;CaptaityClarke.being called, stated tliat hecall ed ow Stacey, and told hint Sir 11. Wilson would not he answerable for any more refreshments he might afford Abe voters. lie did this at the desire of Siral. Wilson, long before the plaintiff sup plied the articles, which constituted his demand. The Jury,.under all .the circumstances, found a vewlict for the defendant. ADMIRALTY COURT, DOCTORS', COMMON S , Dee. 2. SEIZVEI3 OF A FRENCH 'VES S EL OFF MARTINIQUE LADEN WITH SLAvES. This itnportan► question came on to be .furtl►er. argued in an Appeal from sentence of condeama lion passed by the Judge of the Admiralty Court . . of Sierra Leone, whereby the vessel, containing 300 skive's, was confiscated to. Qur Government, with one:half to-the slaves 'on board, whose libe 7 . ration. besides, took place under the 47th of Geo. II!. • . Dr. DonsoN was heard this 45 on Oe same side with Dr. Loshington (beard on a tornier day), in answer to the King's Adi , ocate. He laid much stress on the,principle, r hick is—idunded on the law of nations, with respect-, to the ships of one nation being subject to be visited or searched by those of another upon • the,.higli seas in time of peace. The only authority - which could be le.- gally set up was an authority from the Go vernors of Colleges, anal their authority must be derived under an Act of Parliament.—Here the parties resisted the search; and mud) blood was shed on both sides. The Act of the 47th Geo.- 111. could only . apply. to. British subjects carrying on .the. Slave Trade, and could not apply to the commission of this offence in any other na• tion upon which the right of search could be maintained, and • much less:of condemnation. it the right of search existed in, -British cruisers to wards neutral vessels, the same right existed in other. nations to visit and search, British ships..— What was the foundation of this right ? Only to see.if there were contraband goods on board The empire of the - seas was. said to' be in the British nation ; but this was erroneous. The sea was the • property of nations ; and they had a right to navigate withottt any molestation whatso ever: Then with - respect to resistance on•the part of this vessel, that resistance was-justified bysel&de• fence. Numerous authorities were cited upon this subject. Where the-right of-search het ween nations commenced was between the English .East India Company_ and the Portuguese and Dutch in the East Indies ; but then. they were looked upon to be at war...Vattel, book 2, page 130, says, the English • Company were . fur excluding all other Nations. In the .year .1550 (Camden's Eliza beth) a war. broke out with Spain, because the Spaniards claimed the right - of search • towards British ships in the Bay of Honduras ; which was strenuously resisted, not only by the.Miuistets and . by the Throite, hut by the Nation at large ; and it was expressly stipulated in Convention between uf, and Spain, as-the condition of-peace,,to make good the loss sustained by British subjects ; and in which it was determined that Spaiu had no. right, or any other nation (as. contended-by this country), towards.nentrals, to mike this- visitation or search in the time of peace. : Another seizure,.. in which. that dactrine.was .maintained, was in Nootka,§ouud, in which the Spanish Government agreed . to make . restitution. A like right was claimed by Sweden to be exempt froth search, but was refused by Great Britain. These authorities were so far in 6ppo'sitioh. 'The next' s authority cited by the Learded Advocate 'Was the 'Corre spondence between Lord Cattlereagn, the Duke of Wellington ) , and. Lottii XVIII., by which it aro peared that Monarch refused to. abolish the Slavt Trade till five years afterwards. Bvonaparte im mediately'after.thisreturniog froin Elba,-issued his Decree abolishing :. it from the F . reiich Colonies, and for ever after that date ;.but Louis being re . stored after 'the battle of Waterloo; declared. this' edict 'of thee Usurper as null. and however, afterwards consenta to the , entire , abo• lition for ever, froM and after-the issuing of that , Edict. Then this 'Edict -was.. not -effective, as re-• hated to this.vessel, -until the. French - abolition of Slave Trade hairr7pctid Martinique ; for no law was made to 'apply ex parte facto to the offeuces,. it meant to punish: The Learned Advocate „coo-. tended,. under various •autborities.-and:precedentz cited with analogy to the law of nations, that4he. Court beloti had acted %it - bout jurisdiction, and, therefdre praYed'in behalf of the captured, that' . this sentence of condemnation'. should be set aside, with costs, and the property restored,: Sir 110 CHRISTOPHER ....OBINSON‘(Kin.'s Advocate) replied to Dri. Dodson acid Lusl7higton. lie knew of no prop&ty in the captured kgally eon: stituted which the Court could interfere to re-' store, much less to award cost's of condemn a tio n as against the captors. If ,there was no legal pro perty in these slaves,. the owners or crew of the captured vessel could not come ' into 'a Court 'or Justice with their hands'etained with oppression, and with blood, and deMand thoSe rights which they had violated. 1-his Friend s(Dr.'Dmlson) hatf argued upon general prineifiles with analogy , to the law of nation's, which 'had no applica tion to the present_ case. The mere purpose for which this vessel set out on her voyage, 4-the implements of slavery found on board, wag- suth-- cient to warrant her condemnation. The Court had three courses---it might either not . chuse to interfere with the transaction, on the score of il legality in the trade ; it might affirm the condem nation and jurisdiction of the Court below ;• upon the merits of it, might .say there 'was no le gal property in the, vessel which the Court was called upon to restore, and that the'cipfais acted inconformity to the law of nations as at pie-, sent established for the total abolition of this traffic,: upon the principles of natural justice and hunianity,: and upon the broad basis of morality; it was the . duty of all and every °nation to put a sto10:0, 'such an inhuman and unjust practice—the s'Attie, as ever" one, upon the principle of our Wonicipal Jaws,. would not oniv' be ' justified, .but is strictly ,commanded to -arrest criminals, and to °assist in the apprehending and securing of: persons'in . the,: act of committing assaults or other 'critties. • Dr. ADAMS was heard on the same side. Sir Wm. SCOTT appointed to, give judgment on au early , day. Extract of a leiter from Demerara, dated 28th September, 1817 :—" Our preseht pursuits are considerably paralyzed. From our internal 'situ atiou we are daily doing military . duty in conse quence of the events which are passing among the Spaniards in our neighboinhood. •-.The Patriot forces have been completely triumphant, which has causetrinany of thelloyatist• fugitives to. fly within our frontiers for an asylum ;;and•as a pre cautionary measure; our principal military-force is stationed oa the lines, in order to protect the . plantations from plunder. We find the duty very hard froth the state of the weather ; 'for theAast two months we have bad only One shower oiraini and as ~, we have no other - water within forty miles of - the town, it has for the last fortnight been . selling at 6d. a gallon. The hettt.:at.prosent is most intense; from 100 to 110 degrees, whi::h, contrasted with the cold dews at night, makes' a powerful impression on the constitution." PRICK OF BULLION.-:—New Doubloons were yesterday at 41 and Nero Dollars' -aud SilVer jn bars, standard, at ss. 31(l. PRINCESS CHARLOTTE. ATR. EDITOR,--The sudded death of the Prin.. erss CHARLOTTs having diffused universal grief .through the Nation, is a more striking test of her departed worth, than can be exhibited by funeral pomp, sculpt ure d marble, or the pe n o t panegr tic. In this sad and awful event we have, in deed, cause for mourning • Though youth and Royal birth are great alltovnieu,s, and pispossess men mightily in favour of the eerily age of all Prince,, yet when !hey are crowned with intel lectual accomplishments and the virtues Of the heart, the prepossession. gtowS into an emotion of .admiration, and a feeling of ardent Such were the youth, the Royal birth, the tare accomplishments, the modest virtues, and the fu• ture prospects of out illustrious Princess, that in , dividnals were justly sarigniue to calculating upon the salutary influence of so amiable a•t exampl. • It may he truly and feelingly observed of the Pt in cess, that she manifested in early -. li'e such good dispositions and dignity in her behaviour, that she comtuanded and obtaitied t o .re respect than . many of riper age, wisdom, and exprieuce Nei ther her high fortune, nor her youth, sedneed her into the toils of pleasure.--The co:ti% 4thm of her mind, 'filial affection, conjugal codearnieurs, and the domestic charities might have ben her sole passions. She seems to have nouri,hed a perfect and ,praiseworthy' contempt hr the little great, and to has e 'extended.h r na , tonage and fostering hand to he great little. The Public have, there fore, every reason to deplore the death of this ac complished Princess, not (tidy for what she was but what she was likely to become ..-111 a word, the conjugal virtues have lost in het a most trions example, society its fairest ornament, and Britain.its brightest hope. Having paid•rhis . poor, but heartfelt tribute of sorrow' to the Memory Of a beloved Ptiocess, whose character would have shone brilliantly, even without the adventi• lions polish of high birth, rank, fortune, a nd beauty, I remain, &e, Sir, your obedi , ni servant, RICHARD TURNER. Mita*. Manufactu'rer, 114, Lo4duti " road, Southwark. CITY BUSINESS —A Coorr of Ab-fermen wits .held at Guildhall yesterday, tur the general tbs.. patch of public business.—The ThanVs of the Court were voted to the late . Lord Mayor.— Several bars of Gold, weighing upwards of 3;000 oz. were produced and 'sworn to - es foreign, as also several bars of silver, weigh ing of 14,000 oz.—The Court declared . a D ividend of two per cent. to the Orphans, due on the 5 h day of Jam' ry next, and the Chant betlain was ordered to eo Fmence payment on the 12th of that month.—Tht usual alters against Beggars, as also against Vier and Immorality, were directed to he printed. and is•tted fire Pre-' cepts to the Aldermen of the se%eral Wards to bold Warthnotes on St. Thomas's Div next, for the •Election of Common Councilmen. & . Were di rected to be issued.—Tlie list) d N. w Yrar'h Gilts were directed, to he made.—The various Cout:nit tees for the year ensiling ncre appointen. AbCIDENT.—A shocking accal , -nt occurred Oil 'Bitykfriars-bridge yestridAy t ,a boy, apparcfl iy : about 14 years,-04' age, tvlto was endeitviouriog to draw a loaded truck rip the blidge. The poor boy bad made several ineffectual at rem 1 , 18 to Irer form his task, but the bur lieu ex+ red rf 143" strength. A coal-waggon pds.:tng at ',the lime, he endeavoured to cas a pi cc ill bile. Which "." tOCht'd to (he.handle of the frock, over a hook in the hind ',aft o the waggon ; unfortunately. he failed in his attempt, and the hook e>'oo4l hit wrist, and penetrated through it ; be was rirag,,teil several yards. before his situation was eiscovered: when be was released,' his arm 'vv. is lacerated in a shocking 'manner, and bled profusely 3 - he ivat taken to a surgeon in the neighbourhood, who applied something to stop the Mood, and advi4ed that the poor boy should be conveyed to the hos'- , pital, which was dont aecordirigly • • COURSE OF EXCHANGE, Tor.suat', Dir. :',lB. . Amsterdam • 17 6 B. 42 Us. Ditto, at Sight • ' 37 0 Amster dam Datil; at Sight • 11 7 ~ 'Rotterdam -I t I 1 2 Us. Antwerp „ ll 11 Ex. Money Hamburgh . S 4 7 ti 4_7s. Altona ' . 34 8 ,2f Us. Paris,' 3 Day's date Ditto - 2 iiti. i3ourdeaux, ditto Frankfort on tile Main ' ~' ." .- 145 Ex. M oney Madrid Cadiz • ' l • '374 •Elfettist Sevillu Bab oa 97i Gibraltar LeghOrn ' .. .. 491 Genoa.. 4g-Nenice 25 • Malta..... 49 --7-Naples ' '42k Palermo Lisbon ' Oporto' .... ... RioJangiro ... Dublin... . ~...84.....q,c1..... - 84 per Cent. Agio tirtke Bank on Holland.... 2,p-er Cent. , - Portugal Gold, , in Coin I A '0 0 per,Or. :,..1/nvi..louttlootis New Dollars 0 5 '3f Sayer, initais • . 0 5 3f • BIRTHS. On the 11th of Sulk Nit, at Bombay, the Lady of Nliebit 'Forbes,' Esq.'of Criniond, Aberdeettsbire, of u son anti keir, -On the ctlith• ult. at Swansea, the Lady ,of the licv. 'ra. llewini, Vicar of S Weill - SCA, of a daogbter I MARRIED. At St. Luke's, Chelsea Lieut. Col. Forsteen. t2t h regiment, to Eliza Fitzherbert, only' daughter of the late Thomas Jame* Cotton, Esq. of Sloane-street. DI ED. On Suitday last, at Clapham, Frederic William, youngest son'of Dr. : Marcet, of Russell- square„ aged t 2 years. . • Mrs: Pratt,, : wife of Mr. Pratt, surgeon, of Fectenbasa,, Vorcestershire.. ft is rather singular that this lady was hum, and died, on the same day as the Princess Charloite. On the 24th ult, at Bath, without any previous iud►spnsi time, John Col►, above au years one of the Gnichl in .'the King's Bath. Although he was one 'of Ihe most placid of human beings, yet he may literally he said to have tired lit hot water, —for six or eight hours daily, on his weeks-of at tendance, was he immersed; and frequently volunteered the elaq of absent Guides ; and one evening, baying got into the Bath to adjtist the sluices, he fell asleep it) the stone chair, under the statue of Bladud, and remained in the bath the .whole night. He was upwards of 80 years of age, scarcely knew a day's illness, and was often seen, ‘A hen his busips would allow and the weather permit, ascending Ciairrtoa Down or Lansdown, taking extensive walks. ,ONDON: Printed 1ty..1. B. CARSTAIRS, of No. 29, Cirt - at Orroot:d-street, Queen•square; aua published by W.,A. SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Ilolton-stret4; THE SUN Otrce, No. I 12,' Strand; where Advettiseinctitt;' Vitt**, Letters, &c. (post-paid) must be athinissegb • , F,. r+2,c 't hou s b e 4 , ler 1 ?/(t62 the 41,115, Noy ' { a l[ y 4 livc.. , 0 4 ! tins Dl Ti sr7l r, t kafli k hzer TA %Rs Lore e a ehttso ptcrp that fron titaiJ htrin, ~ etky M 7 te 'lO. .49) . 71 /3EI ti j rec per *7 i A VI ro , foz La) lit ler