The Sun. — London, England, 1817-08-02 00:00:00

HUSH CATHOLICS. otsEr.VATIoNs ON OATHS OF ALLEGI.i7.•fCESWORi s I BY MEM. As it has been announced in the public prints, that thin, Roman 'Catholics mean to petition Par;.. iacncnt next Session, for what is commonly, but imprortly called emancipation, I shall continue inyentavours to silent the British public what may , piobably be the result of that meastire,`should it unfortunately take place. - The following. inci- dents unquestionably prove, that the present Pope arrogates to himself IA high pretensions to interfere with, and govern the teinpora!ities of sovereign Princes, and the consciences of their subjects, as ever were carried into practice in the darkest ages of ROmish sUperStition.—Claitning and exercising the dispenSing and deposing Powers, with which his predecessors for many cen turies had used to gratify their• inordinate avarice and ambition, he by a Bull placed .the blood stained usurper,• Buonapartei oti the throne of the Bourbons, and in the name of the immacu- late Jesus, and invoking the holy spirit, conse crated a sceptre wrested from its legitimate suc cessor by a win of atrocities flowing from the French Revolution, such as never stdined the aiMais of human crimes, of drew down the venge ance of Heaven on the human race. And he de prived of his crown Louis XVIII., the legitimate successor of a long rate of :rings, who had been. regarded for many ages as the eldest sons of the Church, the founders of all its temporal power, and the liberal benefactors to whcam they owed all their princely possessions. Hear what Doctor O'Conor says of it, and he is a liberal and en lightened Roman Catholic priest i—" Notwith standing the oaths of allegiance by which Ro man Catholics swear, that the Pope has no power oyer the temporalities of" States, the Irish titular bishops assembled in synodat Tollow, in the county of Carlow, so lately as the 6th of July 1809, ex tolled as just, holy, and legitimate, those Bulls of Pope. Pitts VII., by which he absolved all French- Men from their oaths of allegiance to the Bour bons, expressly alienating not only the Crown of France, but also the property of all French loyalists, secular and ecclesiastical, and driving from their Secs a :hundred French bishops, who were guilty of no other crime than that of a con scientious regard for their Oaths, and their fide lity to their Prince; and this too, without stipu lating for any compensation, without giving them a trial, though they demanded it—without grant ing them that Which was not denied to the Irish even by. Cromwell, any species of ca pitulation." The Doctor quotes Pope Pius Vllth's 'Bolls, " Qui Christi Domini -Vices," published at Rome the 29111 of November, 1801, and " Ecclesia Christi," of August 15th, 1801 ; against which the Bishops, hurled from their Sees for their fidelity, - appealed. Their Appeal was printed and published by Dulau, London, 1804 (1). Doctor O'Conor gives .some extracts front those extraordinary Bulls We desire that the pre sent letters; and all the provisions contained in them, shall not be disputed, on the ground that any persons whatsoever, either ecclesiastical or se cular, have not consented to them, or have not been cited, or for any other reason whatsoever; and as they cmanated from our own proper mo tires, and from the plenitude of our .4pcstolic pcwcr, we desire that they may remain for ever, valid and immutable." The Doctor truly observes, " I say again, • that the darkest ages have not witnessed any Bull so extraordiaary as this" (2). The reader will find all this in Doctor O'Conor's Historical Address on the . calamities occasioned by foreign influence, signed Columbanus, part 2, page 5, 27, and 38. Louis XVIII. on the 6th of July, 1801, aotested against this monstrous usurpation and ,q oe. the •Papal,sanction of it. His protest appeared in ibe,..Frinch Newspapers, and in those o f el ooy country in Europe. Should not this have made his Holiness pause before he placed that blood stained Monster on the Throne of St. Louis ? On the contrary, he di:l every thing in his power to puove that it was .the result of cool deliberation, and he becaate the herald of this deed of shame, which the following incidents prove :-- On the 29th of October, 1805, some time he ft/re setting'oat for Paris, he convened a ena3 ; s _ tory of the Cardinals at Rome, and informed them, 4 ‘ that he cheerfully and gratefully complied with the desire of his beloved Son in Christ (Napoleon), to be anointed with the holy unction, by the panda of his Holiness ; to be placed by the most religious rites, performed by his Holiness, in the highest rank ; to receive the Imperial Crown by a solemn inauguration from his Holiness, impressing the certmony with a character of religion, and calling down the benediction of Heaven," to cover over the crimes of this sanguinary upstart with the broad mantle of Religion, to consecrate as the zealous and pious supporter of the Holy See, the man who had matte a merit nith the people of Egypt " that he was the servant of their Prophet, who had 'marched , to Rome to overthrow the Pope, because lie had invited the Christians to ma ke war against the Mahomitan religion." As if glorying in this extraordinary proceed ing, and desirous of proclaiming it to the world in thtfoost ostentatious tnanner, he, on the 26th of June, 1806, soma time after his return froth' Paris, coil:retied ; - 4 :: cOnsistory of the Cardinals, and in his allocution to them, he said, " that he, the sac .ces;o4of St. . Peter and *Vicar of Christ, (3) went to Paris for the purpose of decorating his beloved Son in Christ, Napoleon, v%itli the eusigns of :lin perial Dignity ; that Ite aft embled them to cont.- mnnicate 'to them the i...lntaty: conteifuenees, which, by the blessing of bilve it:salted to him from that journey." " What joy, what plea sure, we experienced in our first incer"view with the Emperor,. whose fame has res - dunded to the extremities of the world, and whom 'God has Chosen to restore .his true] religion** .(4). " The consecration and erOwning of the Emperor; and of our dedi daughter iosephine, bis august Consort, • were celebrated in the most soleinn manner." Site was tie concubine of Barras, the Director, who prevailed . on Buonaparte to Warty her,in , considerat ion of being promoted in the army. A. CoOsistory is regarded as the most august and dignified assembly which a Pope can convene or address. Instead of feeling any re sentffien!. 4tt this conduct, Louis XVIII., soon after his retort) to France, in !he year 1814, pub lished an Ordinance for it solemn thanksgiving in all the churches of the Archdiocese of Paris, for the happy return of Pope 'Pius VII. to his States ; (5) and his Holiness, in retnin, order,ed the same ceremony to be performed at Rome. It is now, announced that his Holiness means to ca nonize Louis XVI. This time-serving policy, this extraordinary tergiversation of. the Pope and his Court on the fall of Bnonaparte, reminds me of the extravagant joy of the people at Pagan Rome, on the fall of Sejanns, whom they had previously idolized, as -described by the Roman Satirist— ' - ‘c Nunquam, si quid raibi credis, .amavi." " Ilume ilnminera" ' , 4 i'efl quid" " Tarim. Itotui ? Sequitur fertunam ut scraper, et odit dam status." ' itAik:NAL. Clement ....IV., in the year 1773, Ai:dished the order of the Jesuits by a Bull, in which he de scribed in strong terms their pernicious principles, their crimes, their inordinate ambition, and their factions and intriguing spirit, by wi,ich it is %veil known the safety of Sovereign States had been often endangered, and the peace of Europe had been disturbed - . The present Pope, with an ex traordinary degree of presumption, has, by virtue of the plenitude of his apostolic .power, re-esta blished these fiends in every State in Christendom, by a Bull,' in which he bestows extravagant en comiums on them for their great moral and in tellectual excellence. What an insulttothose So vereign Princes, - to whom he is indebted for his restoration, and . who hat formerly insisted oh their extinction , for ever. He has also revived that sanguinary'fribunal the Inquisition. He has also declaimed against Protestant worship, " as pregnant with fatal consequences, and unfriendly to huinan happiness." . He reproached the French Government, "for its protection of heresies, secta ries and 'schismatics." lie declared any indul gence to Protestants to be " an alliance between Christ and Belial, light and darkness, 'truth and error; sincere • piety and impiety." • Ile claims a right . " to interfere in the concerns of all the na tions of the earth, in secular affairs, and about oaths of allegiance." The Reader will find ail this and much more, indicative of the inflexible bigotry anti intolerant spirit of his chnieh, in the official correspondence bettveen ilia Holiness and the French Government, in three volumes 12tno. published -by Messrs. Keatitige and Bro.wne, booksellers af_tle... Eoglish Vicars Apostialie, Duke-street, Grosvenot -square. This corres pondence with the French Government took plaCe wben'the very existence of the holy See depended on the will of the Corsican Tyrant, who allowed religious toleration in his territories, which, drew forth these severe animadversions from the Pope. I proved in my first letter that the Roman Pontiff was invested by the general Councils with - a power of deposing Sovereign Princes, by absolv ing their'subjects from their oaths of allegiance, and of transferring kingdoMs, and of ei:tirpating heretics, (6) and I proved that these general Councils are declared to be infallible, not only by the canons ,of I the Romish Chnrch, hut by its most eminent modern divines in the British Isle's ; and the determination of the present Pope to carry them into practice, which-1 have incontrovertibly proved, holds out an awful warning, to the Sove reign Princes of Europe. It is astonishing, then, that when assembled at Vienna, they did not in sist on his' Holiness renouncing, in the most public and valid manner, thoSe pernicious and un christian doctrines of his church, which for many centuries have been a fruitful source of treason able conspiracies, assassinations, massacres, and rebellions, and which must ever flow froth the Romish Chatscery upon their subjects, and poison their principles - through the agency of their Clergy. " Like the Pontic sea," " ,Whose icy current and compulsive course, " Neer-feels retiring ebb." SiIAKSPEARL CRANMER. (I) The Irish titular prelates, conscious that these bulls of Pius VII. were schismatical, an d contrary to the Divine Law, extol them - as just, holy, and legitimate, lest any of their clergy, shocked at ,this monstrous impiety of .their chief Pastor, should renounce the Popish superstition. Doctor O'Comir tells us, that the English Vicars Apostolic, dreading the same, resolved to muzzle their clergy, and that -fur that purpose, " they framed a test act, in favonr of the Pope's in fallibility, and approving of Pope Pius Va.'s conduct; in which they determined not to grant faculties to any priests t who would not sign the following p ro p ositions : st they hold communion with his Holiness' Pope Pins VW-- 2d, That they do not believe the said Pope to hare fallen into heresy or schism.-3d, That they do not consider him as be ing the author or approver of 'any heresy or schism." They were really conscious that his conduct was both heretical and schismatical. (2) It is'similar in every respect to the bull by which Pope Innocent 111. dethroned King John of England, and which Pope Pius V. fulminated against Queen Elizabeth is )5E9, by which he deprived her of her Crown, and absolved her sub jects from their oaths of allegiance. The English Papists its 1789, the Irish in 1792, insisted that the Pope never was in vested with such powers, by the canons of their Church, or exercised them ; though they are empowered and sworn to do so by the ad Canon of the 4th Lateran Council. (3) li'hat blasphemy! • (4) In his brief to his dearly beloved children in Great Bri tain, he extols her much more than he did Buonayarte, and 'as if solicitous for the welfare of our Protestant Government, he exhorts them to loyalty and -obedience ; and Set he has been expostulating with the Austrian Government against al- . lowing Protestants public worship. (5) It is truly ridiculous to think that the adherents o f Bnonaparte have liven tinder the frowns of Louis XVIII. who has punished many of theta: and yet he has paid divine ho , nnurs to the Pope, who deprived him of his throne, placed the Corsican thereon, and excommunicated such persons' as continued faithful to the Bourbons. • (6) They are liable to imprisonment, exile, confiscation, and death s by various canons of the Church,•which are so voluminous, that it would require an octavo volume to give even an abstract of them; and popish priests are bound by oath to infuse them into their flocks. [To be coutinuedi • _ _ rnovosAt,s AND itEGULATIOI4S RELATIVE TO THE'KOYAL NAVY. [Contiaualfrom our l'aper of !iestertioo.) We have also not been inattentive to the rites. of Pay allowed to the ofiicprs of his Majesty's ar !fly of ~,',: r espooding ranks. • A military Com mandera the Forces, whose situation is ;:quiva lent to ilia of a Naval Commander in Chief, re ceives, in addition to his unattached, pay, 91. 93. 6:1. per diem; ,Wfiereai we propose for the Nava; Commander in Chief; an addition of only 31. pet . diein . ; but asthe sex pay of the is greater than the unattached pay of the General, it treei!'6sary;in older tti give your Royal High ness a fair tomparativt vfdiv of the subject, to sub mit the fulloWiiig t;.;ble CoNNLANDER ADM 1 LIAL. Sea Pay - /,1,535 As Commander in Chief 1,095 2,930 - VICE-ADMIRAL. Sea Pay - - 8,460 As Commander in Chief 1,095 REAR-ADMIRAL. Sea Pay - - 1.095 As Commander in Chief 1,095 2,190 COMMANDER of the FORCES. GENE rIAL. boitta6hed Pay LGO 1t 0 As Cow. of Ful - ce.s 3,458 o'o • --- 4,151 te) LIEUT.-dENEni.L. Unattached Pay ' 593 0 0 As Com. of Forces 3,458 u 0 4,051 0 U MAJOR-GENERAL. Unattached Pay 446 0 0 As Cow. of Forces 3,453 0 0 3,904 0 0 . s Your Royal Highness will perceive that the'ruilitary ()X -eres pay is, in every case, nearly one-third uiore than ve propose for the nav4 - officer; but there are, circninstances peculiar to the naval service, which, in our opinion, counter balance this superiority. . • In' tiMes of peace , the number of officers having 'commis sions as Commanders of the• Forces, is, we are informed, very limited; whereas the Cominandei - s in Chief in the navy are almost at rolintrous in peace as in war: the number, there fore, of flag-officers who will receive this advantage, and the parrowvr sphere of their duties, must be set off against the inferiority 'Of the sum received. In times of war, the number of Commanders in Chief, if not greater, - is not less than that of Connuanders of the Forces: hut we consider that the superior advantages to be derived by the flag-officer, from his share of prize-moneyi wit! generaqv -(ford an ample compensation for the proposed toteriolity,of pay. Upon the whole, then, of this part of the subject, we trust that your Royal Highness will a,ree with us; that the pro posed rates of pay are just and equitable, as well with regard to the officers themselves, as to the public service at large; and that, however they may nominally differ from the rates allowed to the general officers of his Majesty's army, they will he found to establish as much real equality as the difference of the two services will admit Of. We have presunied to enter into this comparison with the pay uftbe army, lest it should be hereafter supposed that we had not considered the subject in reference to tire military service ; and, in order to show that, although a perfect simi larity cannot be effected; we have endeavoured, as fa ras it seas possible, to attain a real equality, and to obviate any complaints on the sews: of the apparent differences. We think it farther necessary to propose,that Commanders in Chief shall he entitled to this allowance of 31. per diem, only while their flags are flying within the limits albeit - re spective stations, anti that, on their decease, or during their absence, the said suits shall he jpahl, as is at present Provided, to the ollider who shall succeed .to.thc command, if he be a. flag-officer; but if he be a Captain, that he stet! , be entitled to the sum of 11. per diem duririg the time his , broad pernhint may be hoisted as suinmanding on the station. . . _ • And we farther propose that all llag-oaicers,whether Con .manders in Chief or otherwise, shall be allowed to draw for the s . vlinle of their sea pay aid Commander in Chief's pay, with lint distinction. • We farther beg leave to observe to strut Iloyal 114;hriess„ that. The advance of three months' pay now made to errs on theirappointinents, is so ina , equate to the net:es...art expellees of Their outfit, that if has been the 'eu,toni to grant to flag-officers, appointed Commanders in Chief on certain foreign stations, an inippst of one thousand pdunds by way of outfit c—hut we think it better that, in lieu of this occa sional indulgence; every flag-officer appointed to the chief calm:nand of a foreign station, 'should be entitled ,to receive an advance of six months' pay, which would obviate the ne cessity of the' occasional imprests we have hithertO brew obliged to grant. The pay of the other classes has been computed, not with a view t.. any consi , lerable increase, but at a -sum calculated upon the averages of the present rates. It will at first sight appear, that the pay proposed for Cap tains and Commanders is considerably more• than the average 'of the several rates now established : but upon this we have to observe, that the difference is not so great as it appears to be :-- Firstly, because tire lower rates of pay are attached to ships of'the smallest size in each rate, which arc gradually disap pearing from the navy, so that the majw it y of °dicers now employed receive the higher rates of pay; and secondly, be-' cause captains of flag-ships are at present • entitled to a con siderable addition of pay, whiCh comes highest in the lowest rates, and in peace affects a greater proportional number than in war. The value of this addition we have calculated in the amount of net pay before proposed, and these circum stances render the real increase of expense on this headless than it appears. . ' We have proposed that the pay of First Lieutenants of line of battle ships shall be increased front 2191. 3d. per annual,' ,whiebther now receive in common withall other lieutenants, to 1501. per annum, provided they shall be of seven years' standing ; and we recommend that lien-tenants. commanding, small vessels should he raised to the same sum ; and we trust that your Royal Highness, considering the important duties, and high responsibility of the senior lieutenants of line of battle ships, will be of opinion that this iticreaSe is just and expedient : and the increase of 181. per annum to lieu - tenants, who may be subjected to the expellee and responsi bility of a separate command, will not, we trtbt, be consi elered 'too great. It is proper to add, that the principle of making a distinc ' tion in favour of first lieutenants of line of battle ships, is nut new to the service: as at the first establishment of half pay, in 1693, this 'advantage was extended only to first lieu tenants of Ist, 21, and 3d rates, who had served as such for a certain period. Though we hare, for the reasons before stated, recom mended the discontinuance of the flag tray to captains (hav ing provided an equivalent. therefore), we do not propose to withdraw the allowance of Gd. per diem. allowed. to lieutc ['WAS of flag ships, by his Majesty's Order in Council of the 21st September, 179(1, having made no addition to the pay of this class of officers, except in the single instance before men tioned. We have further taken into consideration the pay at pre sent granted to young gentlemen, mates ar roidship.men in his Majesty's service, the average of which (for it varies in different rates) only be taken of the foriner at 401. and of the latter at 301. per annum. We do not feel it neceisary'tO pro pose an increase of these rates, with regardta young men who have scot passed their examination for lieutenants but we hope that your Royal Highness will be Of opinion, that passed that examination, and whoSe respon sibility andwhityhave usefulness, as well as their necessary expenses, increase with their age, are entitled to a higher remunera tion than young personi who may have lately entered Isis Alit jesty's service. We therefore have proposed an increase of pay to all mates and midshipmen who may have passed 'theses examination. W e h a ve to observe, that the examination of yMttrr, gen . tlemen for the rank of lieutenanthas been lately made more strict, as, besides the usual examination in seamanship be fore naval officers, they are now obliged to undergoanother' at the Naval College, as to their proficiency in the scientific branches of their profession. We cannot hut hope that Hie distinction, %%bid' we propose to establish in favour of ibose who shall have passed the prescribed examination (though it is new in his Majesty's service), cannot lie considered as objectionable, either ita-pliuciple, or au:Laut. Connected with this part of the subject is the sitzation of • schoolmaster on hoard his Majesty's ships, which is at present so ill remunerated (namely, at the same rate as the youngest midshipman) that it is found impossibly to obtaitt person* of adequate acquiretnants to undertake this duty ; we however feel so strongly the importance of the subjecr of the education n his Majesty'i navy, as well of the upper ‘) ra l. ll Y , 4 ss in as per n lower, that we hare felt ourselves bounA to pro, pose to your• Royal Highness an addition to the 'par of the' schoolmasters in the fleet ; and if the chaplain should per , form the duty of selicoluiaster, which is highly desirable, we proll63e that he .s!iolfoi r€ . e.eire the pr.)* of. ; thi3 re-; gulatioti, we Lire the tl•ititJle toiclettcy of iaiprov 'tag both the cot:J . :it itat 4::ii respcct;:hll . :ty of tlic tlit schoolmaster ; and our desire to encoi::*;:.4e persoils to tlertAlie this ditty induces ;:s lo roculumeld: that the allow twee. to ::e Sell tit, t allietStXr, ‘.t:t: :',1:111 * S bounty, of 201. per ariunni, and the remoriccatiiin,to the cha plain for the tui tion of roung ger:Oen - len, granted by :the Order 3 in Citurt , el! of the 411: Alarcti, 181°2, and 4ttiMareiti 1818, may hes:: i:untittued. [To be continued.] ASSIZE IN fELLIGENCE. 1-'olll{, Jut:lt 29. Crum Stnn.—:',fter several which wer of no pnl'Alic ititerest, all tile bills - ftinad by the Grand Jury at the prcsnat Assizes were disposel: of, and nothitrg remained to be done.in the ett mina! Court, but to pats sentence on the convicts. .JULY 30.—The Court net this tnorning.at o'clock, and the convic'ed prisoners hiring tiane4.i to the bar, Mr. Baron Woon proceeded to pass. sentence. Isaac I,;radshatr, convicted of a rape on chi body Hof an infant of 7 years of age ; tVllliam Ellis, J o h n Howorth,J ames Scott, James Shaw, and John Jones, found guilty of burglary ; Shires and George Mass, convicted of highway robbery ; Samuel Wood, convicted of horse— stealing ; Robert Wid, of sheep stealing - ; and 'Richard Home, of stealing in a dwelling-house, to the amount of snore than 40s. ; were all sen— tenced to capital puoidtment. The first prisoner was desired to prepare for the execution of t►:e awful sentence of ti►e kw, and to indulge no lopes • of mercy ; the other 10, thon;:ir they had sub jected themselves , by their offer.ces to death, dut , not receive the same fatal assurance, but were de— sired to prepare for the worst, for it was uncettalz to tvhich of . them, or upon Nvbat conditions, the Royal clemency Might be extended. Nicolas Crawford, convicted of stealing; Ro bert Copland, of grand larceny ;ham Field, of receiving Stolen gcrods ; James Ferrar, aman slaughter ; Mary ToMlinson, of uttering courire'r- , ` feits of the new coin ; Haintal! Godley, of .the same offence ; and John Robinson, of a trtis:e meanour, were successively sentenced, the first to. trawportation:for 14 years, the second to trans portation for seven years, the third to imprison ment in the House of Correction for two years. the fourth to imprisonment for one year, the fifth to imprisonment - for one year in- the I-loose of Correction, the sixth to imprisonment in the same place for six months, and the seventh to impri sonment in the county gaol for one year. John King, for !border, had been sentenced to death on Tuesday, innaedately atter his conviction, stud will be executed to-morrow„ The calendar contained GG commit ments,and out of these may 19 were convicted. Alf,aittst several of them 'no bill WW; found by the Gland Juri; pi' 4 were dischurgcd from flaws in the totixt- Mew ; 3 or 4 traversed to the next il,sixes; a cons id era bl e n umber were discharged rlllll rhe a:- IneSCCatOlf.3 nal irth„ 110 ev,denk:e, nod thz rest were acquitted wpit trial. Of the 1,15 v•ersoos Committed on cliarg . es eonnerttd with the 1 tto riots in the neighbourhood of-Elodrkit.field; eight were broing.ht :o and acquitted ; agak.st the greaten number on hill was is,osati ; two tie versed; and Thomas Riley, one of the tai;Ot , stands charted _Larder a w3rr,snt !row Lope' Si:lmonth on su'spicion of high treason. Wiin the omission of the rioters, and 1110;e ag ,%41:i ma no bill„wits found, the calendar ,v as hot inerous for such a County as York, io such a 812.11-•.. son of distress ; nor, excepting the ca,e of who arc • left for execution, .tVere the eritrie.s. charged against the prisoners of very atrocioQii*- - character. LEICESTER ASSIZES, Jurx At ten o'clock both the Judges went to Saint Mary's Church. The ser!..ton (preached by the. Rev. Mr. Winstanly) was purely 1u Tied object of it was to show that infidelity always produces rebellion ; that a systetnatic plan has .of late been acted upon in this country of prepariog the multitude for rebellion by the circulation of blasphemous discussions and parodies ; that delity prepared the way in -Fiance and Ger.. many for the desclations of revolution ; that Maur are new in this country. clamouring for liberty, which is fully in. our possession, only becaos.e they are themselves the slaves of sin ; that po verty never produces wretchedness but by means of the vices of the poor. In his address to (lit: grand jury, Mr. Justice BAYLF,Y there were ne, charges in the calendar that requiretrany oliset dons on his part. It was matter ot great satis— faction to him that there were acne ot crimes which had of late been excited itr this neighbouring counties, by seditious practices acci publications. It was the less necessary toy. to enlarge . on this subject to them, it they wete in church, to which he and his bro:her always went before they came there, and where this (lay they beard - the best awl the most useful he had ever listened to. Lie had not the honour of being acquainted with the eli:tplailt, but he said this because he really considered the discourse as. .singularly good and useful and as unfolding a ver y just view of the present times. towta Strn-s.CaltlyreiT.,eltarged with burglary, was hrought tip for s t r h i ( ; ) ll ) , ri a ll n g ti 1 }1 11 1 :1 1 1( t i r t: I d ni g e l: 1 1 ) P4 look was pale 21A' g h ast ly, and be seemed evidently no well. Tile: - J„d ie with ninch difficulty persuaded him to vic•aft no t guilty to the capital part of the CbArge.. t h e J ur y were taking the oat!), preparatory to trial, he dropped in a tio:e.it convukions,, which was succeeded by another equally The pi obecutor brought forward no evidence, ants`' be was of course acquitted. ire was aftct warti*- brought up and sentenced to transportation ic,r: (ramie-breaking, to which lie had pleaded guilty. 2,5b5 COAL MAID ET, AUGUST 1. Ships at Market. Ships sold. rrire. • .52i Newcaqle .......4si 34x3. ed. to 445. od_ 8 Solidvila.vi .7 671. od. to 4Us. ed. ' I Set,lcli Coal . .... 1............ , 995. od. to —i. cd.- I - Cinders ..... G .....,...---s. od. to —s. Od." LONDON: 1.% - ilgt.scl by J. 11. C,ARSTAIRS, of No. ea, Great Orrnund•street, otmen-square; and. pnblish,ii I W. 4.- . SCItiPPS, of No: 7, South..Molton-street, at THr. St. 4 Office; No. 111. Strand; where Adrettisemcnts, l e etteri, (Liu - it-paid; must be akiresscd. fo