The Sun. — London, England, 1817-05-03 00:00:00

Lioti-or commtAs i ti‘lAy 2. Vat.lons nreonnts moved frir 'front the difreren! public offices were 11ft:041N:a NI/ the respective Orlieerg, and ordered to lie on the 'fable: 4 Mr. (it EN FE LL presented a petition from the of St. Andre‘V, near the Wardrobe, against the London Tithe Bill, signed by all the Parishion , etslexcept three. , .Mr. Baououart also presented, a petition to the s'imme effect from the parish of St. Sepulehre. • Severel -tither pet:4'o'ra were presented: in' the course of ,t he:eveoing to the same purport. They Were all ordered to lie on the Table. , • ' Colonel WOODpostnerned his Motion for, the se.. Cionrreading of the Gnome Sale Bill, from Weti :tieSdaY the 7th, till Veitnesday the 14th iota. Mr. V. LEWIS moved for an Account of the 'tiitaittit'y of•Vi r millen GoiAs exported during the litst j'ear.r-Prdered. • , hrought up the first Report, this of the Committee on the , Police of the Metropolis. The Hon. Member made some &met.- vations .the present unfair mode of litensito4 pithlie: houses, and declared Ms:intention of shortly ceiling - time attention of the ,House to this 'subject. Mr.).. LITTLEToN. presented a - petition frotn, Certain Landholders aria Inhabitants of Birming-; biun, agahnit the 13iIE no i sy before 'the, House •fot ...wksessing tise landlords, &e. , :of Birmingham to time ,PriOr's:: Hates. It complained of partiality in making the • itthabitants of the town liable, and excluding three other parishes conpected ,with it. The Hon Mr. LITTLEViN , and Air%. PUoDALE 'made. a few observations to the effect that all the parties concerued had had sufficient and, proper tiotices of the proceeding. .:. - • • - Mr. J. ,LITTLIITON replied, , in • denial of this fart, and the petition was read, and ordered to cltl tit; the , ktos"e moved that: the farther consideration of the liti,viimg Banks' Bill , he postponed till Mon. Altry.--Agreed to.. , „Lord BERNARD presented a petition( from'the (retie! Jury of time County .of. Cork, against time Irish Grand Jury Presentment and, .ordered to lie on the Table:. OF PIIIVII.FME. Mr. PENNETT said, that it was with great con cern that. he felt it to be his dory, as ClerirMan the Committee appointed to inquire into the :State of the Police of the Metriipolis, to bring rtinder , theeonsideratiou of the House a Breach of Privilege cootained to a linulc recently publi,hed, :and witielt had been sent to the Committee by the :Author, purporting to be " A' Viudication of the :Magistrates acting in Wand forthe Tower Division, from the Charges contained in a printed Work, entitled, r The Report of the Committee on the State of the Police of the Metropolis ; together ry ith the Minutes of Evidence taken before the Committee of the House of Commons.' By Tho• mats M, A. Hector of Bowers Gifford, E3sex amid Magistrate torthe Counties of Mid dlesex and Essex.7-,--Without .norking any Com. teent on the general tone of the work, which was ,by rto means re,veo lid towards the Committee, lie would only 'observe, that several passages were so extremely offewive to the feelings end hostile to the, privileges of the Committee, that it sv , ms thnogir"t tit to silolllloll . hir. Thiriw i lil before them, rv44itive solllc.k:Xplariai ion of his conduct. When eppeareti before time Committee, he *ism ) m,l him,ell to be dirt. Author of the work in (petition. But before he (Mr. Bennet) proceeded to 81:1 1 . e what bail taken place on that occasion, he sv,Qold, request th e Cl er k to rea d f rom t h e 1t0,,1k the whir.ll were the sohjeet of complaiot, The Clerk accordingly (after repeating the title of the Work) read .as follows:--- " I,have ed iuto the constitution of these Committees of the tiouse of Commons, and the mode of their proceed ings,'anti doulit others will be surpriied as welt its Myself at the description. My impression was, that a Com mittee is eontfan,ed of a number of Members who personally attend, that the evidence of every witness,' and the whole entire evidence of cacti Witness, time entered in the Minutes, ikeratim et eurbalim, and printed for the use of the ifetise. " My information, ,however,- has taught ms that my iro. prssCon is most erroneous, and that this was not the mode at least pursued :in. the, examination of witnessts :npou the *barges against the Migistrates of the Towerpivision. log the examination of several ofsthe witnesses, the Chair man only was Present ; Mr. Calvert' is the only Member I could learn who did assist him occasionally, particularly when the house of Hanburt was in question. • This Hon. Member vary mm:h wished Mr. For, of Shadwell, to girt: his evidence, but the private explanation of that Gentleman induced him not to insist upon it. "'A considerable part of the cridenic given in was not en tered on the 'Minutes, and 'a very material rut that was Offered was not accepted; / hart riot theernallest knowledge of the Chuirnutn, other tl►:►u by his occasional sl►ceches as an Qpposition Men►her, by , ,, the name of Captain Rennet, from which f infer be has-lint dedicated much of his, time .to the profession of the law, ►u►d directed his studiej.to the mature of legal evidence. Lt is pretty well known my loyalty to miAirig, and ai ti,Cilitteitt to tho Constitution; ond I bad almost said calm. si.ht le admiration of its forms.- I . have contributed my p ar if? the worst of 'times to its safety. I hope, therefore, that say observations will not be tortured into any intentional respect trihe Committee. radiuowleri g e its authority, and Low to Its deeisiOns. But when'T make this declaration . , it dies not I.illow that I am boutidagainst my conscience to ad rift either candour or impartiality in the proceedings, or that, If the. bndy of Mitgktratei are to be tried, I should slot prefer Mr% 13e...almont brining his charges bcfote my Lord Ellen. borough, rather Una before a Committee of the Ziotibe if Ci)Mtillins, with erten Captai,i Bennet. is Vie Chair. I oftt not pip Hal to the Committees in the time of Ceoriiivell, nor to -Jo . _ t ti r e Committees in Pr:men in tile tinte of the Revo:ution. doloot svibt , ter h tried by Committees. I protest stgaltut o tral by Comoilltees,lnquisitiont; or Storthanthers." Mr. BENNFTT proceeded to state„ that when Mr, Thir!wall appeared before the Committee, bone explanation was required' from him of the pi,o uge s %hid) had been read by the Clerk. He v it i§ nver that part of the explanation relived to himself personally; and confine hims e lf fj) that which regarded the last paragraph tti hich had bean read by the Clerk, beginning v.4tl 4 „, , ,it.iswellittroWn my loyaliy to my King, And attaelsment-tp 2.4 Cinst i itntipn," an!! ending with "1 pecitesi — Etgain ' it b ComMittees, Inquisitions, or StifCrianibers." TheC9mrnittei obsers'iir that this passage con. rained an inuendo :strongly' * pointed against them, and proceeded to ,ask for explanation on the sub ! ject. —The IlUtiourable Member proceeded to read the interiogaiirmi and replies, which were to the following effect:— Q. What grounds had yon for accusing the Corn. titter of want of, candour and deny• doing_ so. Q. Vo your wish that to stand as your reply ?- 1 Yes. Q. How do you reconcile that denial with the comparison of a trial by the Committee, and a trial before my' Lord Ellenborough ?-4 merely stated that I preferred the one to the other. Q. Did you not, in the passage just read, meats to insinuate that the Committee had neither can dour nor impartiality-?.--I object to any question tending to criminate myself. Q. Having stated that you prefer a Trial by Jury to a Trial by a Committee, you add, " I am not partial to the Committees in the time of Crow. well, nor to the committees in France in. the time of the Revolution. I do not• wish to he tried by Committees, I protest against a trial by Com nsittees, Inquisitions, or Star . Chambers." What Witt your meaning in that passlge ?—I meant that winch I stated., - Q. Did you mean to assimilate the present Com mittee to Inquisitions or Star Chambers ?—No; No such thing. I l a id no idol of the kind. Q. What then ditl you mean meant to fill, up'a period. Q. It is likely that this subject cal he brought before the House of Commons. Do you mean to stand by the answers wt ids you' have just made ? --I do. , Q. Have you any thing to add to what you have stated ?—No. The Committee .entleavoured in this exami nation to induce the Reverend blewleman make such an explanation awl apology as might render it unnecessary to .stibutit the matter to the consideration of the Hoose, but in vain,— He' must say also, that 'N I .. Thillwall's Man ner and torte on the ()Oilskin were the very opposite of what might have been expected.-- I hat morning, however, he had tendered to the Committee an explanation of the obnoxious passages,' and of some of the' replies in his examination. With respect to the insinuation that the Committee had 'neither candour nor im partiality, to the question, , on , which hey had answered that he objected to .any question tend ing to criminate himself, he now. expressed .his contrition for the passage.. With respect to his answer to the question.relative to the Inquisitions or Star-chambers, that'he meant to fill up a pe riod, lie now corrected it by stating, that it was a rhetorical figure of speech ; and that he, had no intention of instituting a comparison between the Committee and the Inquisition, or the Star- Chamber. Ile added, that perceiving the publi cation had given offence to the Committee, he had directed 'ilia publisher to stop the sale of Taking, however, the whole nature end eiretun stances of the trausaction into their consideration, the Committee deemed them to be of such im portance as to requite that they should be laid before the . House. He wished to be entirely guided•by the House with respect to the farther proceeding w hi c h i t m i g h t b e advisable' to adopt oi l the subject, his only anxiety being that the privileges Of PArliament should not be em»pro ' mised on the occasion. The first step, hOwever, would be to reqUire the attendance of Thir wail in the House. As the Reverend Gentleman lived at stone distance from town, and as lie had his Clerical duty to perform on Sunday, it might, perhaps, be inconveuient to hint to attend on I ond ay , tin which day he should otherwise move fur his Attendance. Ile would therefore move, " That the 'Reverend Thomas Thirlwall do at tend this [louse on Wednesday next." Sir Osfvsr.» - Mostmer, as a Meniber of the Police Committee, corroborated in every respect the Statemeta %%bleb had just been made by the Honourable Chairman of that Committee. As he was not n Member of that Committee at the time when the Reverend Gentleman published his hook, be was not open to the charge of being intluencetl by any personal feelings, in giving it as his opi nion, that as the passage in . question was, in his apprehension', a libel on the Committee and the Howe, it ought not to be passed over without clue reprehension, He must add, that if any thing could exceed the impropriety of the Reverend Gentleman's evidence, on being , called before the Committee to explain his statements, it was the general impropriety of his whole conduct while before them. Mr.JI.IOCKIIART thought the House would b:ive sufficient Opportunities of considering Whether the subject was a breach of privilege or not, when the qttestion came to be discussed. lint in. I i ul risen to notice what he conceived to be the totally n unparalleled maner which thiColowittee ha proceeded. He had always thought that ! if a Meteber was, of , opinion that the Privileges of the. House Were attacked, the ,complaint uld be matte to the House alone. Ile had alWays.been of opiniOn that a Committee should : not expeed instructions, and that it had .no,right to inquire: of its own accord into any breaclt of the privilege s of th:: flow 4 :; but 'here they.bod taken on them• selves to call a person.before them, and examine InquirieS - had been put to him to draw from him a confession or denial of the offence im .pitted to hint. Now, lie. thought the Committee 'were not invested with this inquisitorial privilege ; they had no power's for any such purpose. This was his °lilt:12011, and he might he wrong ; but 'never knew au instance of the Lind before. Ile thetelote thought it worthy of the dignity Of the House to pause, and Consider Whether what they had heard etas : cOdeoc# tti be befa , rtz them or not. The SPEAKER apprvhended that this WOl the title, and the only time for the Ilotoc to pro nounce whether the subject in question wits a breach of privilege or not. AU he understood the lion. Member to have done, was, to send for the person Whose name was to the book, and ask him some questions, and this appeared to be riot the most unteasonable course, as it afforded an opportunity to ascertain whether the purl)! per. st!':ed iit Ilbal ,t1.4‘1 beeu,so nuattrisably publisbecit It was for the'llo44 ti; 'creel& tihether these pas sages avowei[ by the author were, prima facie, breach of privilege.; and if so, they would order the attendance of the party; If not, they must not proceed farther in the tuatter.—(Hear, hear!) Mr. CALVERT vindicated the Committee from the assertion in book, of there being seldom any Member' of it present except the Chairman. That might have been occasion ally the' fact, but in general the attendance was Mr. WI - tor/TsLav inquired whether it might not be proper to delay the consideration of the question till the paper should be printed. The SPZAKEit said, the question of a breach of privilege' was: what the House always disposed of at oncc.---(' Lear, bear !).--There could be no doubt that tai reflect on the proceeding's of the House, or of any. Committee of the House, was a high breach of privilege ; *And the point now to be de termined was) whetner such retlection3 had been published. • The (4nAN,c,k.lit,t.crn ..of ;the EXC,IfECILIBR OOP& there was no doubt that. 11 breach oftprivilege bad been committed, and it would be for the House, on another occasion, to take into consideration all the circumstances, either as they might add to, extet►uate the offence. He was not aware that the proceeding ,of the Committee 'was liable to any objection, as their object, appeared to have been, not to extort confession, but to afford op-:, portunity for . explanation. With respect to the measure of punishment, ,t would lie fi,r the Honse to consider that the offence, consistv‘i of a'ingle passage in u,,book,.and thatnot of a very heinous nature,. r: 111% WYNN suggestedohat a copy of the eri- . .deuce upon which : tile complaint was fontidetf ought be 14,t1 upon:the. table, before the lionse should come to to decision. Air. SHAW LRFUVRE 1)01e testimony to the tern perate and judicious conduct of the lion. Gentle man (Mr. Bennett.) Mr, Buonoaicit said a lett words to a similar' effect. The .§PEAKRII Observed, that it would be proper to move for so notch of the evidence as the ex planation in question applied to . ; and that it would then he for the House to call on the ac cused, to,know what faitlier , explanation be had to otter. • Mr: RENNBTT. accordingly moved for a Copy Of 00 1 1 1 ,(1011: of the:minutea,of ,evidence taken before the committee; es related to the explanation given to the Committee of certain passages in a work written by the ltev. T. Thirtrvall, which was immcdiately produced, and ordered to be printed. The question for the attendance of Alr.Thirlwall on Wednesday was then put, mitt carried unani mously. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER inteti, that the House, at its rising, do adjourn •till Alonda.—Agreetl to. RYE lIARROPR DILL Mr. Mannat.ay moved the second reading of the Rye liarbotir Bill, which was opposed by Sir G O DFKRYBrIEII and Sir EDWARD KNATCHBULL. Lard Cocuitatce and Sir .1 MES A NA* op: posed the Bill, The latter declared, that it was extremely detrimental to the landed ,interests' and, in fact, contained sonic of the most extraor dinary and extravagant clauses that had been ever enacted. It went to invest the Corporation of Rye with: absolute powers over Romney and revensey Marshes. Mr. JaNxixioN was decidedly of opinion thel the Bill ought not to pa:is, and thought that it ought to be resisted in its present stage. Mr, 'Maitaiti.ey was surprised that the Bon. Member Who bad just sat down should call this Measure improper ; but more particularly, that he should attack it in a manner so illiberal. Mr. JENKINSOM rose to order,' The SPIIAk.,EIt said, that the Hon. Member (Mr. Maberley), had certainly used an unparliamentary expression.---(llear, hear !) M;. MAIItiItLF.Y was at all times ready to sub mit to the Chair : and therefore, if he had said any thing incorrect, he was perfectly ready to of ter an apology, The Hon. Member was proceed miwhen th e cr i es of 'question b ecame general, d strangers were ordered to withdraw. On our return to the Gallery we heard that the Bill had been withdrawn without a division. The House then %vent into a Committee on the subjeCt of placing the Englrsh and Scotch Univer sities on the same footing with respect to the Drawback on paper, when a 13:11 was ordered to be brought in for that purpose. Mr. Gout.Roart introduced a Bill for regulating Marriages: in •INeWtounilland ; which was read a first time, and ordered to, be read a second time on Monday next. lvic,i GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT BILL. Mr. Getman., after a few introductory observa- Onus, moved that the second reading of this Bill should be postponed till this day six months.' ." Mr. ARIIRCHOUBY considered the measure of great importance, anti expressed a hope that if this 1.1111 should be withdrawn, some measure would beadopted for promoting the object during the present Session. Mr. PRETTIB was also of opinion that this measure would be extremely beneficial to Ireland; and thought that this Bill should be suffered to .pass into a law, if no better provisions were sub mitted to the House. Mr. PONSONBY had lamented to hear his Lion. ,Friend: move that the Bill should be withdrawn. His lion. Friend had laboured most sedulously in framing the severahclauses ; and he (Mr. p.) still thought, that out of this Bill a system might be made Which •would be very beneficial to Ireland. Mr. Pitur. conceived it would be the most con venient way to withdraw this Bill, and to bring in at Bill embodying ail the parts of the report which•was laid before the House in the last Ses sion of Parliament. Sir J.Newr.orr considered it in 'vain to palliate or temporize ; and that, unless the present abuses were rooted out with ft - strong-hand, it were better the whole system should fail to the ground : lie thought, too, it would be exceedingly difficult to engraft this new system on the old one. It was necessary that the srounds of dem a nd on t h e pu bli c Aurae Should be clearly larikdC oat, The proceeds- , well ,ceounted for,. and, good.secatitY gir,,en' that present the in ei ne y wfung irolit (be ontortui peasantry was often missing, entlpew oss ess°) were the Consequence., In one district duct into a ceivers had become bankrupt, and it all' high speculations at the, cxpencC . of the Pt should be put, an end to. Mr: V. FITZGERALD admitted the ,etrils of existing system, but thought it -itaP,elSsible: various enactments of the new , lill shoultli law this present SeSsion i, ataliC .4t wise for those who wished well to, IrOindto barras a measure which, if time: werfi:Ov would be productive of the best coosetrenct Sir F. FLOOD had a multitude of oblation the Bill : it did not sufficiently 'gnar(lethe P el frnin l o ss ; it was complicated, and wodil be b' There 'l if divided into two or t h re e parts. The qneStion was pot, ond ib e Os() 13 or 14 new ollices created. i . ,r di Mr. Coortut said, that there %Vire u` new offices, and the office of tOtistiriawr• 1 : . abolished. --.., 1 d be con ' , itnitt.tl this day six muntlis,, NG Mr. PoNsONBY nsked, whether ,ttkot o ° ° . throw rise 13ill out of the ?title . „(110114 tl4 vitt ortiete.. The SPEAKER said, that if the . P.1 1 1 4 Wel e varied it %voald be conddered a 001.9., 14ANKRUPTGY LAWS% . ,' 4 'o Mr.•LOOKIIART moved the secoodyestikag,r Bankruptcy Ilepression Bill, h 4 00aost \lr. IV. CnUIITENAY ohjeCtCa t 0 t . 00 Oil Inlr I itc.t ica I.pie, mid !IS giVipg rise co,eill,. 04 b a l i t ' ll j' i ' de prio%%'%v-eurs at; aPtiltriefl.latnvill.Ctheriglierit:l:lll:o6ol forward, t hey did tter) l e i be j tortl Come forward to assist them, or .o.oo°l. Agt clue to the investigation of the catty fli r . ii „ e nd fraud on the part'ot the hanitruot Itlrlit'VA itltti!'ef.(l ,into. But if .t lie creditufs -- d li on wit H$ unfortunately the , Powet s of the new law, no guPti C" („., pi 11,'e, dkeredOn . which the ,Bill gee "` ' to o; in.ssioners Was w h a t h e co uld u 0 ot cons" ( .1 1 1 tryst iiit woubl,to. to any set of men.. %rile ', ,„,,kaptli the Colimissioners to in toe im , . 00 to Inc w i, o ie o f ni, past life imd,conduct ;jam their . . Opinion of his ~whole characters rt ) : , s d; allow til -allow his certificate. ~.. Alr. J. SMITII IA:III:Ned the ,C.oteri!. Itild "1"k" )t • • L yn d on 'XllTillelt At l C' o tg I h to were t 01 1 1113 . the eirciinwatices of fraud. Yet it ;O s 010 10 that nothing was more comma,' flow ; 0 H oe Bankruptcies, and that sotne'aie4sure%gocosloll sary to repress t hem. Great inc wok wo o the frotu the croWded state of the toopwg,l) 00 01 1 brusincss of the Commissioners ,%ves f L re gibtts ll4 Louillon, The y toore,resetnhied .00", :;,,t tb4 iilits than Courts of Justice• lie u lu by o%cri Powers .given by the f3ill could ett, 00; it "fel l ) ; be entrusted to Country Carnali.' pol' • 0 4 al' fi ll .was intended by the 'Mercantile 13 Y .... I s ; ibis rakr" to to Petition for some measu're oa --- opo l e - 1 he trusted the Hon. Mover wool:-1, 1/ : ) t o be r e .; Bill, to allow time fur that Pet'ual, Vie . t° WO sewed. Ile moved to adjonrn tbc ' day three Sleeks. ° roil' , 11)0 he • r. 1 • ....00KHART in reply dwelt onoited f op 1 ,1 ,. ty a nd the inconvenience which re! :, I.•rsioit.illee,..L. present system of Bankrtipt L. 3 t .'„%„ t lebl' 4 01 [ 1 : Commissioners were taken 0 111- 7,„ a eti hY t t i c le ge t ., swore to, and certiticatei %se t e s i ; and ' ll- As r acm, jority f 1 °- ti e petitioning erefht`),,onderea "",hick! Quo whose property had beet) 3tl•biatios rt 0 , had of all redress. All tlit! ° J b c ollY ° %, e . t o been made to 'the t3:11, Pliga' ,objectioo v;ated by amendments; fie h eti i' i tri ' 0 11 ' posone the debate. , r „I ot the 1 e citi Jour. %V !toll. F.sLEY' comptain-- _ vs i n tl - to the Connuissioll'i ' i t o Ogre of London. ' this. ' Bl The Debate was 0 11 . "ed t° ' of. Joao , weeks. col° , - ' 'the S l4 o petr] A peti • tion was presented (rai d frootltevrefolj Galloway, praying to be relieve rt e Vi c do ic4i tion of the Laws by 'which theY 'v , (1 „ , ..pr ~, from i 1 . 1. •n Ire's ° ' . i" (mg 161eilical (gnats ',„,, d ,,,,,, to be printed. --Adjourned tit moll • ,•; , -----2---- -------- ' flYt 1 ° , AO , , 0 M orrow' 00! CHILD ATV RDE 11..L.-YeStertiflY.l,l to foil! et ail, Spa-fields, the body of ac fine _ll'llvbicii it 0 1 ) ,, eo to, a cord tied round its, nc, by ' 1 0,01,01" to have been strangled. '1: he JO Y n o I Clerkenwell I'Vorkliouse. 'de a " ,pr.- N iel r is i a t a et: , i ne i! ATTEMPTED StIiCIDB..7-N r" ..•—• , 11 1 . l ! to al o' was observed walking several ttra!,ditia, , toe 11.0101" i nor cboly posture by the canal at .00401'1 i r,tt' last lie , jumped: in. Several per c s ea dd . 1 , 00 1, diately to his assistance, and ill A tato, 4) oot° tint; him out with life, Oa ibiry.4' Aso insensibility lie was removed t°'.7„,itoreili„6o, Infirmar . I ' ation Wlls I.l ' „JP' ot y, w iere atom ‘ . 00 1 ) a ; ,e 3111 be stated that he iodgeti at ‘.. i p ot) i ibi ~oticg ~n to Oxford-street, that he , WO a b-,11.00 1 11 ' ~, out of ptace, and that thistle", uoisioas sloiv rash act. Ile still lies in ,0 I"‘c II r i c .----------, 10,,,,' y 440 341 01, 1 to .a o , cOAL h- 1 I‘ll, i j. ot.• 0 3- oil Sbips 1) . .5 0 ' o d, ' • Ships at, Market. 4ri f .... .. ..me• d , to it Neircastle ........... . „ . • ~ 0 . 1 . i , t i .. : :.. I • ' * 1 * . I- - I ,J ' • AuT) the INI laSt. 3t his illiOlanSelkililiffard•iireer' tlie vt, htlitlil Ohm Fuller, Esq. of 3 (1,3,41,11,vi 1 ,/ , Yesteidaz., : lltlY2 t i . lept, r. o tetil , Wv i i II PA Aratign. ~. ail 6°14 re I _On the Ist inst. at St..lanies LA1 1 ? - 'dsughte io, lto !%sq. of Kin's Couty, ireia lid, to rdotisp.to,S,P, te.oi ltn_ettle, sq. of Vpper Serrour- sore is f ilili. F On Thursday last, at Tunbridge, '".., o f the, , og ''qi t° Williamina, yoururrst 0ug111.41., yoritsliii, cc' (31* °llvr: Ettt. of Oishorough PriorY, 11....t0n) t° The' sante any, gr. teobb, of Soo thawr ilaughtssr of Mr. Jalla Fenn, of I/0003P priibafifvi DIED. n :if e. odrlie ,4140 P ,v e j '.4 Op rel°icnt 'tntr Jol9bintill'irlit.blinnet,l;lSl:.l'iklYni' irtiliooljtol'pe,:itionoj :00AI, ' P r r a i T ia e r % Esti ;n l t - :: .lll ; e al Linckr-tit'uetli:l:3l',:'ffid3lll:itt,:fi'tetics6l4:llt3rll In his 78th ire ir a ft er a tew hours , f i ier A f iti 1 : : )n Sunday night last, tit path: t he Ogle° , otio u 0 . 3 , rwa . rtis of 20 years a Cleo ii,,, „,,,iiiijori i f S ate tor the Howe DepartntriO4 o f ?to , ,i , o pei °n Om 9ti inst. l'arid tc.f,ttiall, ''''-, - gerre ag!:d 79. ._ Ifftotreet'voilicP Nudtienty, on the itt leiat, r. „.,. - . Mri'AViiikb, aged, ~,wiclavi of tbe ..,,, `4 woo -------------------.------- '---- ... 1 11°`. ti il t i ' ...... .00 , o •i e d DY , :• ,0 ItSi 0,- olto ' T of LONDON: Printed by J. IL CA opt o , tit 0010 Ctrinond-street, . atwortquar4:t :405, SCRIPP;3_, of Digh 71 Sulltil Initdfetil 0 ince; Nu. 4 IS,' Strand ; `` h 3 t! , oglifill. ' Lttirrs, Six, (pcot•paitiYass*t w 4