The Sun. — London, England, 1857-01-05 00:00:00

TBE RILHOUSIE DELUSION. A. few years back there appeared in this journal a series of articlee on Indian affairs, which attrectool con siderable attention from individuals in various parts of the country conversant with such matters —among ethers the late Sir C. Napier, who said, in his usual emphatic manner, that a short time would prove the truth of what was then only prediction. One object of these articles was to show that the main aim of the then Governor- General was to bolster up a reputation for himself, by any means, chiefly through press puffery., i n which he is a most adroit proficient, and at the sacrifice of any man who thwarted his egotism. So industrious and subtle, however, was Lord Dalhousie in filling the public ear at home with certain versions of his Oriental exploits—generally mixed with insinuated contrasts at the expense of others—that people began to regard him as the real Coming Man ; and indeed as such he was held out to us by those who were supposed to speak by the card. Time is beginning to unmask the machinery by which this delusion was got up. Indian affairs are about to undergo an ordeal in the ceming ses sion they were never before exposed to, because the pub lic knowledge of them is much greater than ever ; and we shall see Lord Dalhousie very speedily reduced to the category of certain other Eastern personages who figured as heroes in England even this time twelvemonth, but are now something very much the reverse. Meanwhile, as preparatory to a true understanding of w his lordship's achievements, we would poi n t t o an article of very great value, in the current number of the New Quarterly, bearing ample evidence of k now l e d ge of the whole question ; and the pith of which we purpose laying before our readers, if only in corroboration of what we previously said. It would seem, from this analysis of his administra tion, that the appoiettneot of Lord Dalhousie to the Governor -Generalship was a mistake on the part of the borne Government, and one, jedging from the cata logue of his errors and short-comings, which it will take long to rectify. His frequent bickerings with his subor dinates and with successive commanders-in-chief are commented upon as incompatible with a minri of the high class required in one occupying such a position ; while the regard which he pr d'esses for the welfare of the people of India is shown to he a barren sentiment, for of the reality his administration affords no indication. The state in which he left the country is adduced in proof of the correctness of this view of his character, and the Indian Blue-books, his own Minute of February last, and other documents, are quoted as evidence of the truthfulness of the reviewer's strictures. The results of the investigation made at Madras into the police system of that presidency, and the horrible practice of torture, not only as a means of extorting confessions of guilt from accused p• rsons, but as an instrument for enforcing payment of tie land tax, are held to be conclusive as to the state of affairs in that quarter ; while Bengal, the centre of Anglo-Indian rule, is shown to be in a condi tion scarcely, if at all, more tolerable. Torture, police connivance at dacoity, insecurity of life and property, Zemindar extortion, and constant disputes about land, arising from the uncertainty of tenure and boundaries, consequent on the absence of a complete survey and re gistration, are among the evils endured by the rural population of the province in which British rule is of oldest date. This condition of the Bengal Presidency is contrasted with that of the Punjaub under the sway of Runjeet Singh, a contrast which Lord Dalhnusie'e an nexation policy renders the more forcible, and the means of making which have been furnished by the marquis himself in his first Blue book relating to the then re cently annexed north-west territories. In that docu ment we are told that, under the rule of the Maharajah, "justice was dealt out, private properly in land, the re lative rights of landholders and cultivators, the corpo rate capacities of village communities, were all recog nised." •Ruineet Singh had gone to his account when this was written, and his dominions had already been absorbed in British India; this testimony to the justice of his rule (and it is contended by the reviewer that he affords a fair example of native Sovereigns) is therefore the more reliable. But it is chiefly against the financial measures of the Marquis, and the violence and irnpolicy which characterised his treatment of native princes, that cen sure is most forcibly directed. His civil administration is acknowledged to have been not unmarked by improve ments, though most of the reforms for which be takes credit are shown to have been the work of others, as the excellent police of the Punjaub, which was inaugurated by Sir Charles Napier, and carried out by those whom that no less great administrator than soldier appointed. But it is the financial system of a country which deter mines its prosperity. Now Lord Dalhousie's would seem to have been so defective that, while it injured British credit with native capitalists, it would scarce have saved the Indian treasury from bankruptcy but for the largely increased revenue accruing from opiate. This increase, moreover, has not been due to the mea sures of Lord Dalhousie, but to those adopted by Lord Ellen borough and the conquest of Scinde by Napier, an acquisition which closed up the only r onaining avenue by which opium could be conveyed to the seaports with out paying toil. How much credit is due to the Marquis for his management of the finances of India is to be seen in the Parliamentary accounts, which exhibit, by the way, a remarkable want of agreement with the figures given by the late Governor-General in his Minute. The net revenuelof India for 1846-47, the year preceding Dalhousie's appointment, was 18,053,0001. ; and in 1853.54, the last year for which the accounts have been made up, it amounted to 20,328,0001., showing an in crease of only 1,678,000/. instead of four millions from territorial acquisitions, and two millions from opium, as stated in the Minute. An examination of the expendi ture exhibits a similar discrepancy. In 1810-47 the charges amounted to 19,024,0001., and the deficiency, al though that was the year of the Sikh war, did not exceed 971,0001. In 1853-54, India being then at peace, the 'charges' were 2%372,000/ o and there was a deficit of 2,044,0001., notwithstanding an addition of 8,351,000/. to the Indian debt within the period of Lord Dalhousie's oo vernment. This was the financial condition of the country when the man - tele effected. the cenvers'.on of the 5 per cent. debt into one of 4 per cent.—an operation for which he takes great credit, as having saved 300,000/. per annum to the company in the fern of difference, of interest. The reduction was made, it wculd seem, to give eclat to the last days of his ruie, the prosperity of which it was made to seem the indication being entirely fallacious. The accounts for that year having only this year ('56) been published, the real state of all t.irs was of course unknown. The conversion was effec:ed, but the amount thus eared was only as a drop of water to the Ganges, in comparison with the existing deficiency and the increasing disproportion between income and expen diture, and the baseless fabric of Indian prosperity soon fell to the ground. Lord Dalhousie was compelled to contract a new loan at 5 per ceut., and to guarantee the stockholders against any reduction of interest for four• teen years, without which it appears doubtful whether the money could have been raised. A serious blow was thus given to British credit, the effects of which are apparent in the difficulty experienced in filling up the loan now open. In the examination of Dalhousie's policy with regard to native rulers and territorial acquisitions, the arguments of the reviewer lead irresistibly to the cenclusion that, no more in external relations than in financial measures, have the interests of India been advanced under his lord ship. The conquest of the Ponjaub, which be merely completed, is shown to be the only one from which any benefit is likely to accrue, and that only in a military point of view, there being a deficiency of 59,0001. on account of that province, although the marquis claims an addition therefrom of 1,500,0001. to the revenue. Peen is not ceded to us by treaty, and our future possession must depend upon tee ability or otherwise of the Bur man monarchs to recover it. In the meantime the re- I venue derived from it only amounts to half the expenses ' exclusive of military and marine charges connected with our occupation, rendering it a positive loss to the Com pany, although Lord Dalhousie's Minute represents a gain of 220,0001., which is nearly three times the amount actually collected. The other annexations made under his rule add nothing to the glory or stability of our In dian empire, because the rulers of the territories thus added to our already overgrown possessions in Asia had long been mere cipherg, dependent on the company's for bearance. On the other hand, while the revenues ob tained from them are, far the most part, absorbed is I the charges incidental to a military occupation, their annexation has spread discontent and distrust through out India, in consequence of the violation of treaties and disregard of the established laws of succession involved in them. Of the rationality of these laws, Lord Dal house, it is contended, was not to immemorial th e j u d ge ; suffi cient that th ey ex i ste d f rom time through out India, and that repeated assurances had been given the Hindoos that their ordinances and customs should be respected. The writer concludes his anatomy of Dal housie's eight years' rule by referring to the crowd of illustrious natives now in London as petitioners against his injustice and rapacity, and pointing to the fate of the conquest-founded empires of the past as an indication of what may take place in India should the same policy be continued, the English element being to the native but ' as one to five thousand, and th e l atter yearly progressing n intelligence and social influence.—:es„ rpool A won. ENORMOUS TGRNTP.—Mr. Taylor, of Showle-court, has grown a common turnip, of enormous size, on land manure(' with artificial manure, supplied by Messrs. J. and T. Robinson, of Gloucester. It weighs 25,1 lbs., and measures 3 fe e t 7 i nc h es by 3 feet 5 inches in cir cumference ; the quality is excellent. A SONG FRO3f THE DOCK.—Caroline Arearthy, a ticket-of -leave woman, and George Hayman, a marine, were indicted for stealing a silver watch and guard, the property of Edward Giles. It appeared that on the 20th of Dec. last the prosecutor met the prisoner in Granby street, Plymouth. She caught him tightly round the waist and took the watch from his pocket. It was after wards discovered that the prisoner Hayman sold the watch for 31. The jury having returned a verdict of guilty the recorder in sentencing the prisoners observed that .11`Carthy had been transported for a similar offence for seven y ears, and had obtained a ticket-of-leave, but it appeared to produce no effectupon her, and he should therefore toe sentence her t o 14 years ' transportation. In referenc Hayman, he should commit him to prison for 12 months, hoping he would have time to reflect an his position, and on his r e l ease he would then m a k e a good member of soFiety. The prisoner M'Carthy, who was a daring looking woman and of robust form, ex tended her arms and s a id , addressing the recorder,' "I am v ery much obliged to you for the sentence you have passed upon me. I have flow a chance of go i ng abroad, and I shall have an opportunity of doing better than if I had stopped at home. Fortune smiles on the bad, and I am h appy I a m going out of the co un t ry. Many hundreds I h a ve robbed, and f I should return many hundreds I s h a ll rob again. She then left the dock singing very loudly. Mr. Joyce said a more unfair proposition never was made, as no such order was made when Mr. Sleigh opened his case. Sir R. W. Carden said if such an application had been made to him on either side he should have felt himself bound to accede to it at the beginning of this inquiry, and it was therefore his duty to do so now. Mr. Joyce said be would not oppose the application, because his own case would stand upon its own merits, but in Mr. Sleigh's case he knew it was necessary to have the witnesses in court. Mr. Sleigh thought such observations should not be made, because, had Mr. Joyce applied in the first in stance, the witnesses would not have been allowed to be present. The witnesses having been ordered out, Mr. Joyce said he felt this inquiry had been protract. ed, and a cloud of witnesses had been called in support of the case against Mr. Barber, but which he would show was one of the most flimsy character ; and feeling, from the manner in which this prosecution had been con ducted, it was a malicious proceeding on the part of this self-styled public prosecutor, who would ultimately be made to pay for the gratuitous, mischievous, and un merited attack upon his private character. With regard to the history of thi s case , h e m i g h t mention that Mr. Potter, without saying a word to any one, went to the police-court, and, unasked--he was going to say almost encouraged—made a statement, and afterwards made use of the criminal law as an engine to crush and defeat Mr. Barber in the vindication of a just right. When he sought to relieve himself from the stigma of such a charge, the course pursued by Mr. Potter had been adopted by him for the purpose of closing his mouth in another court and before another tribunal. With reference to the evidence, it did not show that the persons alleged to have been defrauded had complained or had any desire to prosecute, and that fact alone ought to arouse the magistrates' suspicions. It had been said that Mr. Potter was a public benefactor, for taking these pro. ceedings, when, in fact, it was not until an action for defamation was brought against him for a slanderous statement made by i i n in the justice room, and from that moment Mr. Potter had the strongest personal interest in the course he had taken in this matter, but Mr. Potter was labouring under a mistake if he thought a committal by the magistrate would deprive Mr. Barber of all redress by civil action. With regard to the testimony of the prosecutors, he would convict them out of their own mouths, and he was surprised that any one iu a wealthy place like the City of London should have en tertained such a charge, when it was proved that the poor had been amply provided for by this institution, until Mr. Potters exposition, to an extent beyond any other institution of the kind. It had been shown that 1,300 persons had been fed on the Christmas-day, and he should prove that 1,800 were fed on that day. In spite of Mr. Potter's vindictive proceedings, he should show that this was a substantial institution, and if any one were liable to a prosecution it would be the com mittee, who were ready to meet any charge which ma lignity might think proper to prefer. This institution I was founded under the name of the " City Hospice," under the auspices of Sir F. Kelly, the then Lord Mayor, and other influential ,gent'emen in the City. Mr. Cochrane was most indefatigable in the management of it until his death, when the institution changed its name, and underwent certain other a!teratiens. Mr. Barber was re-appointed under the new system as ma nager, and his wife matron, with 1001. a year, rations, and apartments, which were not unreasonably high terms. That was the arrangement, and all donors of a certain sum, by virtue of such gifts, became vice presidents. The servants of the establishment received board, lodging, and wages ; and therefore the beer they received was only in accordance with their engagements. No one could suppose that anything in the shape of donations should be sent for any specific object, when it was obvious that donations, whether in money or goods, were forwarded for the general purposes of the institution. When it was shown, as it would be, that Mr. Barber had the we;fare of this institution so much at heart that he hail relinquished hie clai_u for. ea?ary for the last two years., in order that the destitu tion and want of his fellow -creatures might in some degree be alleviated—(epp!ause) —it was preposterous for the prosecution to assert that this institution was not a pubic one, when in fact it was notoriously so, and it was shown to be so upon the very face of the circulars of this society. As for the tale of the suet and flour, it was only reasonable to suppose the servant thought it Was bad, and therefore sent it away, and although Mrs. West, the pie-shop proprietor, said it was sweet, it should be remembered that she sold ihe pies. With regard to the law of the case, the charge being for ob taining goods under false pretences, it should be shown that the false pretence referred to an alleged existing fact, whereas in this case tse goods were obtained upon a promise to do something in the future, which was not a fah e pretence. • Sir R. W. Carden recommended Mr. Joyce to confine himself to the facts. Mr. Joyce said he wished to draw the magistrates' atter.Lion to the law, and afterwards he would come to the facts, for it was upon bath that the magistrates would have to decide. Mr. Sleigh said he had proved that these goods were obtained under certain and divers false pretences. Mr. Joyce said he was not asking the magistrate to some to an immediate decision; but he felt it his duty to neglect no point that would be favourable to his client. Mr. Martin Said the part relied upon in these charges was, that the defendant was making collections of money and food for the purpose of giving the poor a good dinner on Christmas-lay. Mr. Joyce said then he would prove that that part of the case was equally rotten with the rest, as that inten tion cn the part of the committee had not been proved to be untrue. But, as he said before, he did not rely upon any teehnicil objection, as he world prove beyead a dou'A that the beer was given to the poor, and that no part of it was consumed in Mr. Barber's family. He ei-xt came to the evidence for the prosecution. Cooke, the first witness, was dismissed for misconduct ; and he wrote to his late master (lllr. Barbee) threatening him, if he did not take him again into his employ ; and after that, of what value was that man's testi mony ? In that letter, which had not been read before, C oee complained of the injury done to him by discharg ing him from a situation which he anticipated holding throughout the season. The next witness, the man Bright, left with the coat of the institution upon his back, and having money in his pocket, applied for relief to the union, for which he was sent to prison for seven days. This man had avowed himself to be a chest and a liar, and his only excuse was he was drunk, and knew nothing about it ; but how much was the evidence of such a man worth ? The very fact of his being drunk is corrobrative of the evidence for the defence, as it was for drunkenness that he was discharged. The boy Flude denied having received any money for suet ; but that was the only doubt thrown upon his veracity, for it would be proved he did have some of it. That, however, being twelve months ago, may have slipped his memory ; but his evidence actually assisted the defence, for he swore that Mrs. Baroer said the suet was bad, and such would be shown to be the fact, As for the biscuits, it was not pretended that any were given away ; but they would be accounted for. Neither :was it pretended that beer was given away after 4 o'clock, because Mr. Barber found the servants getting intoxicated, and stopped the supply at that hour, so that the women who swore they had no beer, came after that time, and they did not therefore affect the case at all. He would not question the veracity of the police, because they might have been mistaken when their arduous duties and the lapse of tune were taken into consideration ' • but if the p ersons he should call, who actually partook of the beer, denied that fact, he could only say that th ey would have com mitted grass and deliberate perjury. He next came to the two girls, with whom it had been alleged Mr. Barber had been tampering, and, if such was the fact, then Mr. Barber would be subjett to all the penalties of his act; but as these girls had told Mr. Horseley they partook of the beer, he regretted any offer of reward had been made to those witnesses from the bench for the evidence they had given, when a more abominable attempt to calumniate and injure any one was never perpetrated. Sir R. W. Carden said Mr. Joyce misunderstood him. He had no intention of giving the girls half a-crown, but merely to tell them that, if their statements were true, they would not be the losers of the amount which they said Mr. Barber had offered to them. Mr. Joyce said he was very glad to hear that he had been mistaken. With regard to those witnesses, he should prove that on those girls leaving the court they said they had been better paid by Mr. Potter than Mr. Barber, and one said that her her chap had told her what to say, and that they expected money for the evi dence they gave, and they further remarked that if they got two shillings each they would take one room between them, for what purpose must be obvious to a'l in court. This conversation would be proved by three or four witnesses, and, further, it would be shown that the girl Hayes, instead of being three years in th e service of Mrs. acey, who had gone to Australia, no such person lived at the address given at the time, but the girl's sistd• did live in the identical house described as Mrs. Stacey's residence. Mr. Barber's witnesses necessarily must come from among the class from which the two girls had been brought, and Mr. Horseley very wisely TILE SAMARITAN INSTITUTIOX. rejected their testimony, because he considered there Was something in their manner that indicated their cha racter to be unfavourable, and therfere not favourable witnesses in such a cause ; and it was not reasonable to imagine Mr. Barber would have detained them after they had detained them after they hal been rejected by Mr. Horseley, his solicitor. He would prove all he had stated and he was sorry that the public time should have been taken up so long with such a trumpery prosecution. The case was already gone according to law, but he would meet it upon the facts, and prove that he was merely the agent of the committee, and not responsible for these matters. He would mention that before Ponsford's flour came in, Mr. Barber had purchased 40 quarterns of flour from his own resources, to make puddings, and he was heartily ashamed that any one could be found to utter such defamatory libels as those that had been emanated by Mr. Potter. With regard to the biscuits he would prove that Mrs. Barber sent the biscuits in small quantities from time to time to . the poor. He would also prove that one barrel of beer was tapped on Christmas eve, and exhausted, and the other on Christmas morning, and nearly all consumed during the day. As to the sale of the suet and flour, he would prove that it was not until ten or twelve days after Christmas day, when it was no longer available, that the suet being rank and stinking was sent out to-be sold as such, and the proceeds, about 63., Mrs. Barber gave among the servants of the institution as Christmas gratuities. He would prove that the beer in question was sent away when brought to the table at the dinner party, as none of the family drank porter, and the servant went out for pale ale, end ' he would be called to prove that fact. That was the case for the defence ; and if he proved all he thought he thought he should be able, he would ask the magistrate if this was not a complete answer to all these charges ; and when Mr. Barber's evidence, as it would, went forth upon the wings of the press to the public, he would come clear out of this matter, and then it would be a question if Mr. Potter's share in these proceedings did not call for condemnation rather than praise. He would call one witness now, and then con sent to an adjournment. Mr. Sleigh said he was prepared. to go on with the case until the conclusion, or adjourn at once. The evidenee in support of this statement was then postponed until Tuesday forenoon, Mr. Barber entering into the same securities as before. in money. After Anderson bad g ot the money he came out of the house, and we all three, with the fourth man, met in the same street, and we walked to the Eastern Counties Railway, where Anderson was to meet another young man to send off with the other check. I and Anderson went into an eating house opposite the station, Saward and the other man waiting close by. Anderson met the young man near the platform of the railway and took him with us to the eating house. He was sent with the other check to Messrs. Barclay. I followed him and saw it paid, part'y in 101. notes, and the rest in money. It was part of my duty in these transac:ions to see the parties back with the money, and I did se in this instance. The young man who got the money in this instance was going over London-bridge instead of returning to the railway station. I went to him, touched him on the shoulder, and asked him if he wa s not going the wrong way. (Laughter,) He replied he was going to his late employers to see if Anderson had sent for his character. At this time Anderson passed by a name which I can't recollect. He changed his name each time he sent a check. I said to the young man a gentleman is waiting for yen at the railway. He has a particular way of trying his servants before he employs them. (Laughter.) I then returned with the young man towards the railway station, and on our way we met Anderson, who went alone with the young man into a public-house. When he came ont he and I met Saward, and he gave to him the money he had received from the young man. We all went to the neighbour. hood of Hackney road, when Saward said he would take the notes and sell them to a man named Hall. Saward left, and Anderson and I, with two other men, waited' at a public-house in a street in the Hackney-road. I should know the house again. Saward subsequently returned and brought back gold, which was divided amongst the five. Saward, on that occasion, said he knew Hall well, but he did not say who he was. I don't know Peter-street, in Hackney-road, by name. After this Saward said that if ever I heard of anything or knew anything I was to communicate with Saunders, and that if he had anything he would communicate with me through Saunders. I never knew where Saward lived. My address was in Cottage-lane, City-road, and I lived there in the name of Hawes, with a young woman who passed as my wife. I was occasionally visited there by my aunt, Elizabeth Hayden, who lived near King's cross. Whilst I lived there Saward visited me three times. Saward on these occasions said he had some business more to do, as on the former occasion, if I would like to join him. I did so, and apartments were taken and a check was presented on Messrs Smiths, Payne, and Smiths. When Saward visited me he showed met3iX or seven cancelled checks on Smitb, Payne, and Co., issued by a person named Ash ; he also showed me something like this (a check for 901.), saying that apartments had been taken, so that the checks might be presented. One apartment was in Oakley-crescent, City-road, and near the Sportsman, behind the church. The others were nearer the New River, off from the main road. I was to watch the men to and from the bank with the checks and money. I did not know how these blank checks were obtained. Saward said he had them from somebody, and that be believed they came from robbing. Saward left the cancelled checks in my pos session on the day a check was presented to Smith, Payne, and Co. I went with Saward, and we met An derson and the same two persons as on the former occa sion in the road. We all went to a public-house at the back of York-place. On these occasions Anderson dressed up for it. He always wore a wig, and sometimes whiskers. He dressed himself in the public-house, and went to the house in Oakley -crescent. I and Saward, after he went in, watched in the City-road, near the Sportsman, which is at the corner of Oakley-crescent. We saw the young man who was to present the check go in and out of the house. First he was sent to Camden town about some luggage. One of the men . who was with ns at the pnblic-house followed him there and back. On his return he went into the house in Oakley-cres cent. The man employed to watch the young man at the railway station at Camden -town, returned without him, being tired of waiting for him in consequence of the number of inquiries he was making about the luggage. We were all waiting about the City-road when the porter came back. When he left the house a second time he went in the direction of the City, and I followed him. It had been arranged that Saward and Anderson were to wait at the public-house until I came back from the City. I followed him to the bank. The young man at first went to the counting side for payment of the check and on his going to the other side he was stopped. I started off; got on an omnibus, and went to the public house and informed Saward and Anderson and the other men of it, on which we all parted. The cancelled checks referred to by me, and now pro• duced, are, I believe, the same I had from Saward. Another paper like the one produced was also left with me [a sheet of engraved cheeks of the North-West Bank of India]. They remained in my possession till something that occurred afterwards compelled me to leave in a hurry. They remained in the possession of the young woman who passed as my wife. When these documents were givea to me by Saward she was at Byrne and saw hire. She came into the room while they were on the table. My aunt was at the house that day. Some time afterwards I had a communication about some checks with Saward. He said he had sent to the banker at the corner of the Haymarket and had got one —I think it was Ransome'e. It was at a bank nearly opposite Dent's shop in the Haymarket. On a certain day I watched three separate young men take three separate checks to that banking-house. They were all paid, and the money was handed to S sward, and he, Anderson, myself, and the other two I have referred to, shared it. The money was divided into six parts, one being allotted to the " book." (Laughter.) That went to the party who obtained the book. I received an extra portion in Barclay's ease, and Saunders also received a portion of it. One of the cheques on Messrs. Ransoms was sent from a house in the neighbourhood of Park street, Camden town, and afterwards, in reference to that cheque, a young man named Markham was appre hended in mistake for Anderson. Mr. Mullins—Unfortunately that young man was convicted, but as soon as the error was discovered he was pardoned. The Lord Mayor—What was the amount on Ran' some ? Saturday having boen fixed for the further investigation of the charges agaicst, Mr. Surr Eiwar. I Pack Barber, the secretary to this institution, the defendant appeared before Sir R. W. Carden and Alderman Humphrey at Guildhall. There were four separate charges of obtain ing under false pretences one barrel of porter of Messrs. Manners and Wells, one sack of flour of Messrs. Pons ford and Co., of the City Flour Mills ; one barrel cf porter of Messrs. Hoare and Co., and one barrel of biscuits of Messrs. Huntley and Palmer, of Reading, with intent to defraud those firms. Fur the greater accommodation of the public, this case was heard in the Court of Common Pleas, Guildhall. Mr. Sleigh, instructed by Mr. Buchanan, appeared, as before, on the part of the prosecution ; and Mr. Joyce, instructed by Mr. Horseley, for the defence. The depositions taken on the last examination were then read over by the chief clerk, and verified by the witnesses. Mr. Joyce Paid with regard to the two girls who gave their evidence en the last occuion, he thought it only right to say that he was prepared to contradict their testimony, and in order that they might have an oppor tunity of correcting their evidence he wished to cross examine them upon it. Sir R. W. Carden said Mr. Joyce had better not have the depositions altered. Mr. Joycs said he bad received information since the previous day which he intended to bring forward, and he did not wish it to be thrown in his teeth hereafter that he had neglected to cross-examine them upon the evi dence he should adduce. Mr. Sleigh objected, and the application was refused. Mr. Sleigh then applied that all the witnesses might be ordered out of court while Mr. Joyce was opening his case. The court was very much crowded throughout the learned counsel's address, which lasted shout three hours. Mr. Mullins- 7 -200/. Examination continued—Shortly afterwards Saward sent for me in reference to something to come off on Sankey's. In consequence of what he said I went to Cumberland-street, Hackney-road. Saward had shown to me the document that was to be presented. It was a bill of exchange for 3361. 173. 10d., drawn by M. F. Jennings and-Co., upon Samuel Dobree and Sons, three months after date, and due in April. On that day An derson went dressed up to a house in Cumberland street, Haekney•road, and from thence sent a young man with the bill to Hankeys% The bill was not paid, and I went to a coffee-house near Shoreditch Church, and communicated it to Saward and Anderson. I know Mr. Turner, solicit)r, residing in Red Lion square, and I employed him en professional business. Before that Saward said he had a blank cheque signed by Mr. Turner, on Goslings, by which they could get some money. Saward suggested that I should take a fictitious I 0 U for money owed to me and employ Mr. Turner to obtain it. The money was to be paid and left in his h an d s a f ew days, because he might psy it into his banker's, and when I went for the money Mr. Turner might pay me by a cheque. I went to Mr. Turner,taking him an I 0 U for 301. odd, and gave Mr. Turner in structions, as had been previously arranged. A sup posed debtor was created in the name of Hesp, and a lodging taken at Bagniggewells-road, with instructions to the landlord to take in all letters so addressed .Some days after I went to Mr. Turner to know if the debt had been paid. I advanced the money for its payment, and my brother carried it to Mr Turner. When I went afterwards to Mr. Turner he informed me the money was paid, and Mr. Turner's clerk unfortunately paid me in cash instead o f b y c h e ck. I communicated the result o f i t to Saward, who said we must wait a little time, and then do it again. In the latter end of May I heard of Hardwicke from Saward. Saward told me he was going to meet a person in Farringdon-market, who bad just returned from Australia, who had some business f or him (Saward) to do. By business I understood forgery. Saward, Anderson, Hard wicks, and myself met at Farringdon-market as appointed. I knew Anderson by the name of " Bob." Hardwicke had been out of England some time, and Saward said he knew him before that—that he had known him for some years. I did not understand from that that Hardwicke THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY __EVENING, JANUARY 5, 1857. Saward affixed one of the stamps to the 1,0001. bill, and wrote the indorsement across it. The bill was then taken I - y Anderson back to the lodging, to be given to the young man Clements to take to the City. It was also arranged that we should then disp-rse, and meet at the public-house at the bottom of Bishopsgate Church yard, for the purpose of learning what was the result of the bill. Hard wicke went to the banking-house, and was to wait there until I came. Anderson left to go to the lodging, and I to follow the young man. Saward remained in the public-house at Kingland the last. The young man left by 'bus to go to the City, and I rode unknown to him by the side. I saw him go into the bank. Hardwicke followed him in, and Seward, who had come to town, was in the neighbourhood of the bank, near the clock of the Post-office in King William-street, where he could see what was going on. Shortly after 'Hardwicke came out of the bauk and gave me a signal, and I went into the hank. The clerk had got out the money and entered the note, but on again looking at the note he found it was a forgery, and he put back the money again. We all shortly after met at the public house in Bishopsgate-churchyard, and remained there an hour. After having some refreshments we all went to the Shades, London-bridge. Mr. Mullins—lt was by the merest chance the money for 1,0001. was not paid. Witness continued—On -June 16th I again went to Mr. Turner's, Red Lion-square, the matter having been discussed amongst us again t Hard wicke advanced 100/., and I took his I 0 U, signed in the name of Hart. I got the I 0 U from Saward, and the same arrangement was made about a lodging, to which letters were to be addressed. I gave Mr:Turner instructions to write for it, and the money was paid to Mr. Turner by some one Hardwick° employed, because it was his money. A few mornings after I wont to Mr. Turner's—. five of us, Saward, Anderson, Hardwicke, myself, and a fifth man having first met in Red Lion•square. The firth man had got the blank cheques which Saward spoke of, by pickiag Mr. Turner's pocket. I went to Mr. Turner's office, but be was out. We all waited in the square, when a gentleman passed, and Saward said "That's Mr. Turner." I went back to the office, and was paid by a cheque for 1031. Bs. 10d., signed by Mr. Turner, for which I gave him a recsipt in the name of H. Hunter. I used that name on both occasions. Mr. Mullins—Why ? Witness—Because we should then get the first three letters, hun, to form "hundred," in Mr. Turner's hand writing. _ Saward—That is an absurdity. If the cheque were for a hundred pounds or more the word would be in the body of the cheque. Mr. Mullins--Yei ; but on the first occasion you only tried for 30/. Mr. Mullins, addressing his lordship, said that he found himself physically unable to proceed further with the case that afternoon. The examination of the witness would occupy nearly two hours longer before it could be finished, and as it was then a quarter past 4 o'clock, he proposed to ask for a remand. Siiward applied to his lordship to have the articles found on him when apprehended given up to him. The Lord Mayor—What are they ? Saward—Five or six shillings, a memorandum book, two blank checks, and some keys. The Lord Mayor—The money might, be given up to you, but the prison regulations will not admit of your using it. I certainly shall not let you have the other articles. Saward—There is also a small tortoise shell pen- knife. Mr. Mullins—l shall object to your having that. The Lord Mayor—l shall not make any order for the articles being given up to you. Your friends may have the money. Mr. Mullins said, that as the further examination of the witness Atwell would take a considerable time, he wished an early hour to be named for the next exami nation. On that occasion he proposed to finish the evidence of Atwell, as well as that of the other convict, Hardwicke. He had upwards of 30 other witnesses to examine, but he did not propose to take their evidence until he had the whole of the main facts from the two convicts. ' The prisoners were then remanded till Wednesday next, at 12 o'clock. iItELAS.O. DUBLIN, SATURDAY MORNING. LEGAL ENCOURAGEMENT OF PLUNDER. Under this head the Freeman's Journal has a pertinent article in reference to the case of Mr. Montgomery Knighting, whose " real estate" has bean the subject of legal investigation this week : "The criminal law, as regards public defaulters, re quires serious modifications. At present it is almost impossible to insure a conviction on a charge of embezzle ment ; and we have seen, in the case of Mr. Knighting, that conviction for forgery under certain circumstances does not hold out those terrors which the uninitiated were led to suppose. Mr. Knighting's counsel, in the course of the week, argued, and argued, we believe, cor rectly, that the present law will protect for his personal use such portions of the plunder of the Great Southern Company as he invested with due discretion. It would appear that Mr. Knighting robbed his employers of several thousand pounds, and that he invested some of this money in the purchase of real' property. Now, a just law would hand over all that property to the right ful owners. But the old aristocratic system steps in in aid of felony—and why not 2 for it was itself a huge felony—and declares, according to the undisputed dicta of Mr. Knighting's counsel, that real estate is sacred, and that, even when proved to be the di rec t p ro d uce of money feloniously obtained, the convicted felon who stole the money to purchase it may, at the expiration of his sentence, come out and live in the luxurious enjoy ment of his 'real property' without fear of molestation. The money which this felon expended in the purchase of chattel property is forfeited to the crown, but all the fee-simple and freehold purchased by the proceeds of his forgeries, the law, it is argued, will guard for him till his return to the world from his temporary retreat will allow 'of his again revelling in his booty. Now, if this be the 1 there is no more certain road to fortune and a luxu rious old age than the open path of felony. The felon has only to be bold in the execution of the Jobbery and aristocratic in his tastes, and a few years of seclusion, during which his morals and health will be carefully attended to at the public cost, will secure to him, while he is yet youthful and vigorous, wealth which a life of well-spent industry will not secure for the virtuous and upright when the worn out energies are no longer equal to the struggles of life. The honest bank clerk, who looks forward to a retiring pension of 1001, a year after 40 years' service, has only to turn thief, according to the alleged law—to make a good haul, invest his 10,0001. or 20,0001. in the purchase of real estate' in the Hen rietta street Court on the first sale day, accept four or five years' exclusion from the world and its cares, and emerge, at their expiration, a swell of five and-twenty, with la, property of 500/. or a thousand a year. If his plebeian tastes lead him to the funds, or to mortgages, or judgments, his labour will be in vain ; but only let him do the real thing, become an estated gentleman, and the law will protect the estate against the claims of the plundered, and head it over to the plunderer, at the expiration of his gaol apprenticeship. If this law prove good we hope Mr. Knighting will push it to its full limits, and render the farce of his conviction com plete, by placing his real property' under the care of the Chancellor during the period of his probationary seclusion." DUBLIN, SATURDAY EVENING. It has been blowing a terrible gale of wind since 12 o'clock, and there is scarcely a probability of the mail boat making the passage to Holyhead to-night. P BICES OP SHARES. Prom the Official Lzst. rUBLISIIED EVEILY TUESDAY AND FRIDAY EVENIN LONDON, FRID AX, JAN. 2, 1856. CANALS. Names of 4 Dividend Names 01 ti Dividend Price. per ~.." . „,c e. Companies. A per Companies. 4 Annum ' - 4 Annum. y., -- --• I A ehtn &Dia 98 71. p. ct. P ea k Forest. 7s 51 Os 76 Birmingham 40 41. Regekt's • • 30 17s 16% Coventry.. • • .00 11, Rochdale.... 85 41. Derby .. •••• , 00 61. 15s. 84 ,Stfird &Wor, 45 281. 440 GrandJ unetn 100 11. pr. ct. 'Stoarbridg‘. ,45 111. Do., 6 pr. Ct. 10 61. pr. et. Severn and' 21. Grand Union 100 7s 6d Wye Rail. j 26 Kennt & Avn 40 6s. 'Warwick & 21. 25 Leeds &Llvrp ' OO 251. 1 Birming. 3 100 Leicester .. •• 00 61. 49 1 ,4 1 Warwick &I 21. —. 1 Leicstr 3a Nth 83 11. ss. Napton.. 5 100 Loughhorogh 143 70 4 550 iWorcstr &i Macclesfield. 100 21. 10s. 51 , Birmi ng . 78 10s. Neath •••• • • 100 16/. 'Wilts & Brks 7s. Od. —' Oxford.. •• • • 100 103 WATER-WORKS. Name of Company. Dividend per Annum. Amount Share. Paid. THE GREAT SOUTHERN AND WESTERN FRAUDS. The Commission of Inquiry in the case of Knight ing terminated to-day, and the jury found the Crown entitled to all the personal property of the convict, consisting of bonds, bills of exchange, pro missory notes, policies of insurance, ttc., estimated to amount to about 12,0001. in value. This will all be given by the Crown to the Rail way Company. The convict holds his real property, as he was not capitally convicted, and subjected to attainder. It is valued at 3001. a year. Knighting was sen tenced to six years' penal servitude, at the expira tion of which he can recommence life with this amount of independent income. ADVEVISEMENT 1 7. Holloway's Ointment and Pills, —An Extraordinary Cure of a Sore Neck.—Mr. H. J. ' Tomlinson, Burton-upon-Humber, Yorkshire, has in formed Professor Holloway, that a gentleman perso nally known to hint had suffered for a very long time with a sore neck, which formed itself into an angry and running wound ; he had the best medical advice for months, but it availed nothing ; finding that the disease increased to an alarming extent, he commenced using Holloway's Ointment and Piils, which in five weeks effected a perfect cure.—Sold by all medicine vendors throughout the world ; at Professor Holloway's Esta blishments, 244, Strand, London, and at 80, Maiden lane, New York ; by A. Stamps, Constantinople ; E. Guidicy, Smyrna ; and E. Muir, Malta. [ADVERTISEMENT.]—A most interesting recovery from a vast complication of diseases, such as indigestion (dyspepsia), flatulency, constipation, nervous, bilious, and liver com plaints, cough, asthma, consumption, and debility, without the • aid of medicine, by Du Barry's Reva lenta Arabica Food, is recorded is the following let ter :—Cure 52,422.—" Bridgehouse, Frimley, 3d April, 1854. I have suffered these 33 years continually from diseased lungs, spitting of blood, liver derangement, deafness, singing in the ears, constipation, debility, shortness of breath, and cough, and during that period taken so much medicine that I Can safely say I have laid out upwards of a thousand pounds at the chemists and doctors. Indeed I was in utter despair, and never expected to get over it, when I was fortunate enough to become acquainted with your Reva lenta Arabica, which, Heaven be praised, restored me to a state of health which I long since despaired of attaining. My lungs, liver, stomach, head, and ears are all right, my hear. ing perfect, and my recovery is a marl el to all my acquaint ances.—l am, respectfully, JAMES Ipszars, wood-merchant.— Supported by testimonials from the celebrated Professors of Chemistry Dr. Andrew Urn ; Dr. Shorland ; Dr. Harvey ; Dr. Campbell ; Dr. Gattiker ; Dr. Wurzer ; Dr. Ingram ; Lord Stuart do Decies ; the Dowager Countess of Castle stuart ; Major-Gen. Thomas King, and many other respectabl e persons, whose health has been rest ore d b y it, after all other means of cure had failed. Suitably packed for all climates, with full instructions. In canisters, 11b., 2s. 9d. ; 21b., 4 , 1 8. lls, ; 121b5., 225.; s u p er - re fi ned, llb 6s. ; 21bs Bibs., 225.; 101bs., 338. Th e 101b s. and 12 . 1bs carriage o iae free, on receipt of post-otfice o r d er. Barry du Barr. y ail Regent-street, I,9edo u ; ""' ton, -'lason, and Col'urv . e , y 7 e ' r t s to her Majesty, Pi eca dill y ; also at du,Gra9ech . u'reh-street ; 330 and 451, Strand; 4, Ch eapside; 68, ornhill • 49, Bishops ga :e-street; 55, enaring.cross; 54, Upper Baker-htreot; 63 and 150. Ozford-street. Berlin ..... East London .... Do. 4 per Cent Pref. Do. 5 per Cent Pref. Grand Junction ...... Do. New ...... Lambeth New River Company„ Southwark & Vauxhall West Middlesex • • • Do. Do, Name of Company. flungerford.... •• . Southwark ...... ••- : Ditto New of 734 p.c. Waterloo ....... Ditto Old Ann. of Si. Ditto Nw ditto of 71. Vauxhall ............ GAS-LIGH' Name of Company. British Provincial Brighton .....• • • •• City of London ...• •• Equitable European .... Great Central Imperial Ditto New Ditto Debentures Do. Continental I st Cap. Do. Do. 2d Cap. Do. Do. 3d Cap. Do. Do. 4th Cap. Independent ... • • • • •* London Parl. Preferen. Phcenix •• • • •• ~ Ratcliff Surrey Consumers United General Westminster Chartered Ditto, Nnw Western A .. Ditto B . Name of Company. 51. per cnt. tit. per cnt. 4/. per cent. 51. per cent. 4(. per cnt. 51. per cnt. 4i. per cent. BRIDG: Dividend per Annum. 10s per cent.' 11. 12s. Od. 11. Ss. Od. 28s. [T AND CO Dividend per Annum. 71. per cent. 51, per cent. 21. per cent. 21. 10s. Si. per cent. 81. per cent. 101. per cent. 31. ss. 41. 15s. 41. 10s. 61. per cent. 5 ±. per cent. 5/. 81. per cent. I 3s 6d perch 6/ per cent. FRANCE CO: Dividend per Annum. L s. d. 10 0 0 Stock. 25 0 0 25 0 0 50 0 0 25 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 too 0 0 61 0 0 5 1 8 Amount Slaare. X a. d. 25 0 0 100 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 60 0 0 40 0 0 70 10 3 COMP. Amount Share. 8. d. 20 0 0 20 0 0 150 0 0 50 0 0 23 0 0 10 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 Stock 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 40 0 0 25 0 0 60 0 0 20 0 0 10 0 0 50 0 0 59 0 0 50 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 ;PANIEB. Amount Share. 20 0 0 100 0 0 ANKS. Amount of Share. X s. d. 100 4L all 11 THE GREAT CITY FORGERIES. MANSION-HOUSE.-JAN. 3. [The following appeared in part of our impression of Saturday :—] THE 6AIVAED FORGERY GANG.—This afternoon, the further examination of Saward and Anderson, remanded for forgery and uttering a 1,0001. bill of exchange, was resumed at the Mansion-house, before the Lord Mayor ; and created intense interest, in consequence of Seward's connection with Agar, the gold robbery, and the alarm ing extent to which Agar and others belonging to the same gang have victimised the bankers of Lon don. Several of the principals of the large banking firms were present, and had the satisfaction of making the personal acquaintance, for the first time, of men who for a lengthened period have drawn on them without the usual and necessary introduction, and who, up to this time, have baffled all attempts at detection. At the last October sessions two men (one an elderly man, a returned convict), named Hard wicks and Atwell, were convicted of forgery and uttering checks to a heavy amount, which they got cashed, and in conse quence were transported for life. From the dis closures they made after their conviction, it ap pears that they were in connection with the two prisoners Anderson and Saward, and it was their disclosures that led to the latter's apprehension. The prisoners were described on the police sheet as follows :—James Anderson, of Freehold-street, Durham-road, Heston, servant, for forging and utter ing on the 14th of June, 1856, a bill of exchange for 1,0001., with intent to defraud Messrs. Heywood, Kennard, and Co., bankers, 4, Lombard-street, and James Townshend Saward, of Villa-house, Walworth common, barrister at-law, on suspicion of being con cerned with the above James Anderson in forging and uttering the above bill of exchange. Anderson was apprehended on last Friday fortnight, and was privately examined on the following day, and the infor mation then given led to the apprehension of Saward by Huggett, a City detective. He went to a back room in John-street, Oxford-street, and inquired for Mr. Hop kins, the name by which he had heard Saward was living there, and he was informed he was gone to a public-house in Oxford-market. He went to Oxford market, leaving Moss, another detective, behind, and en his return he found Seward in I'd ets's custody. Seward denied all knowledge of Hard wioke, Atwell, and Anderson, and Feld he was not the person of whom the officers were in quest. Huggett, however, rcfneed to listen to his statement, being certain he was the man he wanted, and he accordingly took charge of him and conveyed him to the police-station, and his first exami nation took plac e on l as t riday week, when suffio;ent evidence only was given to justify his remand till to-day. Anderson on last Saturday was examined before the Lord Mayor in referenoe to other forgeries, it being deemed prudent that the examination in reference to the 1,0001. bill of exchange should not be gone into until both prisoners were present. The evidence on that occasion adduced against Anderson was that on Saturday the 16th of August last he uttered successfully two forged checks on Messrs. Hankey and Co.—one for 1001. and the other for 50/ , and the plan he adopted was this : he went to the White Hart in Bishopgate-street, entered the coffee-house, and desired the hoots to be seat to him, on which he gave him a check to get cashed. He then went to the , Four Swans, in Bishopsgate-street, and repeated his con duct with reference to the other check. He then re turned to the White Hart, received the money of the boots, and then immediately went to the Four Swans and received that also and decamped. Another charge was entered into against him on the above day, that of giving a man named lI iberts, residing in St. John's wood, a check to get changed, but in that case the bankers refused to pay it. The plan adopted by Ander son was the same as that followed by Agar, that of get ting a stranger to present the checks, which allowed them to make off if any difficulty was experienced in cashing the documents. Thu prisoners were placed at the bar at 2 o'clock, when their examination was proceeded with. Mr. Mullins appeared for the committee of bankers to prosecute. Mr. Goodman, chief clerk, asked Anderson if he had legal assistance Anderson—No. Mr. Goodman (to Seward) —Have you any one to appear for you ? Saward—No, Sir ; I will take care of my own case for the present. Mr. Mullins then stated the course be should pursue— namely, that of confining himself to the number of for geries committed in 1856, with which he intended to connect the prisoners ; two in January, for 142/4 one in February, for 901.; three in March, for 2001.; one in April, for 3801.; t wo i n J une , f or 1 , 4 10 1 .; and tree in August, for 2501. At Saward'e request, the evidence on his former exa mination was read over, and he denied that he made use of the observation in the cab to Huggett, that "it was no use denying it, I'm Jim Seward." It was not likely he should do so, for he had no desire to court criminal notoriety. He said to him, "As you have taken me for James Seward, I admit that I am the person." Tee evidence taken on Saturday last was read over as against both the prisoners. His lordship asked Seward if he wished to put any questions to the witnesses ? Saward—No, my lord. I am not mixed up with those transactions. Mr. Mullins—But I propose to show that you are. Saward--I decline putting any questions to them. The first witness examined was Henry Atwell, now ander sentence of transportation for life for forgery and uttering. He was brought up in custody of Mr. Wea therhead, Governor of Newgate. His appearance is much altered for the worse since his conviction. He deposed—l am a convict under sentence of transporta tion for life. I know both the prisoners at the bar. I knew Seward first, about 12 months since ; at that time I had some blink checks and paid checks on Messrs. Barclay and Co. in my possession, the produce of a burglary committed on the premises of Mr. Doe. I showed them to a person named Saun ders, residing in the Old Street-road, and inconsequence of what passed between us I went a second time to his house and he introduced me to Seward. I showed Saward two cheques that had been crossed off paid, and returned, and also the blank cheques. I left Saunders with him, and he wished to know where Mr. Doe's place was, and I went with him to Brick-lane, Spitalfields, and showed him. He said, after he had seen it, that it was not a very large firm, and he did not expect to get much money from it. He left me, and promised to see me again. In Saunders's house Saward said he could get some money with the cheques by filling up the blanks and sending them when so filed up to the bank. He had a person, whom he called "the sender," that he would . introduce to me, who would send them to the bank when filled up and get them cashed. After Sa ward had seen Mr. Doe's premises I left the cheques in i his poss e s s i on . Ab ou t a wee k a fte r I saw hi m n company of Anderson and two other persons, in New-street, Spitalfields, near th e c h urc h. It was th e d a y on, which two check s were presente d a t Messrs. Barclays. At that meeting Saward returned to me the three filled up checks I had previously given him, and two that had been blank which ware filled up, and to the best of my belief those now produced are the same. One is dated 9th Jan., 1856, for 46/. 153. 6d., purporting to be drawn by J. T. Doe, jun., on Barclay and Co. The other is dated Jan. 10, for 55/. 17s. 6d , purporting to be drawn by the same gentleman, and on the same I bank. Sa war d carr i ed those two checks in the cuff of his coat, and when he took them out and showed them to me he compared them with the other three. The cancelled checks were then tarn up in the street. I, Saward, and Anderson then went to Leman-street, and I was shown a private room that Anderson had taken as a place from which the check could be sent. Anderson went into the house whilst .1 and Saward re mained outside near the house. It was previously arranged that we should remain outside the house until the man who was sent came back with the money. I was to watch him and see if the money was paid. Shortly after we commenced our watching, and Anderson had gone in, he came out, and I followed him to Messrs. Barclays- He went with the ch ec k f or 461. ss. 6d. I saw the m money paid, and the man w en t stra i ght b ack with the money to Leman-street. There was another man in communication with us, and he went to Ander son at a public-house, where he was waiting, a n d in formed him the money had been paid. I think the check was paid in three or two 10/, notes, and the rest had been transported. When we met first it was merely an introduction. We went to a public-house and had something, and then parted. Afterwards we met at the " beef house," a public-house known as such by them, near Cox's vinegar yard, Southwark-road. Be tween that time and when a 1,000/. bill was presented, we four met at this house several times for the purpose of discussing this " business." On one of these occasions Hard wicke produced the 1,0101. bill now produced, a❑d some printed forms. At the first meeting Hardwicke produced a 2001. genuine bill drawn by Messrs. Gross man and Co., of Hobart Town, upon Mr. Austen Ken nard of Austen Friars. The bill was endorsed to Hard• wicke, and accepted by Mr. Kennard, and made payable at Hey wood's. Hard wicks also produced some old bills filled up and some blank bills, all of which he gave to Saward, who took them away. On the day the 1,0001. bill was presented I saw it for the first time at a public house in Kingsland-road, but I knew it had been prepared, because Saward appointed the meeting relative to its presentation. One day I was in a hatter's shop in Cheapside with Anderson and Hardwicke, when a young man now present, named Clements, came in. He asked some questions and left, and he was followed by Hardwicke, and I went to Kingsland, where Anderson had hired a room in the name of Riley. It was after this that Saward arranged for us to meet at a publichouse in the Kings land-road. On a Saturday in June this " business" of the 1,0001. bill came off. On that morning I first saw Saward, Anderson, and Hardwicke at Child's public house, in Old -street-road, and there Anderson "dressed up" at usual. We then all went to the Englefield-road, Kingsland, about 9 o'clock, and to a publichouse—a large house with a small garden in front, with stable and coach houses attached to it. I can't recollect the name of it. Anderson went from the publichouse to the loci;.;ings, and before he did so Hardwicke pro duced a 201. note, and Saward asked for pen and ink. It was brought in by a female. The room was not in a fit state to receive visitors, and the female apologised for it. When the pen and ink was brought in a name and address was written on the bank note by Saward. The note was given to Anderson, it having been arranged that Anderson should send a young man with it to the Bank of England for change. Anderson returned, and we understood the young man had been sent to the bank. Whilst waiting for his return the 1,0001. bill was produced. A date was put to it. [The acc - Otance was blank, the date having been subsequently written in.] When the young man returned, Anderson went to the lodging, and returned with two foreign-bill stamps, which he said the young man had brought from the City. Country Markets. ITADD - i1 , 114-Thli CORN MARIZ.ET—JAN. 2. The supply of wheat and beans larger. and of barley oats smaller, than in last market. Sales were is ther heavy. WHEAT. BARLRY OATS. BPI 04 First l ,2s 0.1 43s 6ii. 3ls Od 51a Od Ice. I Second 42s 2d 1 35s 5d } 22s 7d I 44* 4d Third 3 os Od I 2,/s Od I 18s 0.1 I 361 Od Total quantity of wheat in market, 897 qrs., 876. sold barley 3.i. 749 qrs., 736 , sold oats ,; 487 qrs., 40.3. -.old PP beans PP 51 qrs., 2 3 s o ld AVERAGES PER IMPERIAL QUARTER. Wheat, 2/. 2 1 5-12ths I Barley, ...11. 15 5 11-42ths Oats, ... 11. 2 7 7-12ths I Beaus, .....2% 4 4 9-I.2tb is IP N DALKEITH GRAIN MARKET-JAN. 1. Qrs. Best. Current. In retior 524 Wheat 60s Od 1561 Oats 34s Od 2ls 7d 792 53arley. 42s Od 33s 6d 16 Peas & beans 16s Od 34s 3d 3la Od ABERDEEN—JAN. 2. Potato oats 21s Od to 23s 0(1 401bs per bushel Common oats 20s Od to 21s Ocl Bore qos Od to 36s Od }s3lbs Barley 30 8 Od t o 36 s Od Wheat, red (spring)3os Od to 42s Od 14621 Ni , white 3os Od to 50 s Od to Oatmeal 16s 6d to 178 6d per boll. Flour 51s Od to 52s Od per sack. PEOVISION MARKET. Beef, por lb 6d to 9d Mutton, per lb 7d to 9d Lamb, do., Os Od to ON 04 Veal, per lb ... 7d to Os 9d Pork, per 5t...5s Od to 5s 6d. Salmon, per lb ......Os to Os Grouse, per brace Os to Os Tallow, p stone, 008 to 12s 61 Rabbits, each... Butter for exportation (preset Eggs, wholesale price, per do Butter, p lb. is Od to is id Eggs, p doz. Os lld to is 01 Hens, p pair 3s Od to 3s 6(/ Chickens,do. 2s Od to 2s 6d Ducks, do., 2s Od. to 28 6 Ducklings,do3s Od to 3e 31 Turkeys, each 4s Od to 5s Od Potatoes, pr pock, ...8d to 91 Od to 10d. nt cure) per cwt.9BB Od to osoB Izen PRICES. RETAIL Flour,l4lb 0s Od to 2s 10d I Oatmeal Os Od to is 9(1 Beremeal ....0s Od to 2s Od Peasemeal... Os Od to 2s 8d 1 4-Ib. 10af...8d. Barley flour,l4lb O to 2a 4d lf dust, Os to la Od , per lb. 2d to 2id Sids, .... .... 841 2-lb. 10af...4d. DUBLIN, JAN. 2. We have no alteration to report in the currencies since Tuesday. The supply to-day was small, and everything met a steady but not a brisk demand. White wheat, 32s Od to 35s Oct ; red ditto, 31s 6d to 33s Od; ditto new, —a ; barley, malting, 16s to 25s Od ; gr find ing, 15a to 20s 64 ; oats, old, —s to —a; ditto, new, lls Oct to 15s 01; oatmeal, 14s to 15s 6d; bare, new, 16,s to. 18s 0.1; rsp. d, 303 Od to 32s Od per brl ; bakers' flour, 20s Od to 263 01 per cwt; Indian corn, 32s 01 to 36a Od por 480 14. LOCAL SHARE MARKETS. LIVERPOOL, JAN. 3. t 5 &MOE EXOHANGE.—Th e mar k e t i s t o l era bl y ae give, at 15 the prices of yesterday. Lancashire and Yorkshir a, 974 16 —East Lancashire, 233--London and North Waste re 107 i —Great Western of Canada, new , 24 3 pm.—Blackburn, ?c% 84 —Midland, 83—North Western, /B—birkenht , ad and 10% Lancashire, 65. 7i BIRMINGHAM, JAN. 3. STOOK EXCHANGIC.—We have had another dull. market to-day, but a good deal of inquiry after North S d,affords. Midland, 83i—London and North-Westerns, 107; --South Ice. Staffords, 9.3.9. MANCHESTER, JAN. 3. Albion •• .• • • •• .• •• Allianoe Eri i• and For. Ditto Marine ....... Athenaeum........... Atlas .. trgus Life British Conmiercial • Church of England .. City of London .. •• Gen. Life County .. • •• • • Crown .............. Eagle.. Equity and Law...... European Life......... Family Endowment •• Genera 1.............. Globe Gresham Life . • Do. D 0....... •• Guardian ............ Imperial Fire....• Imperial Life Indemnity Marine.... Law Fire ............ Law L1te..... Legal and General Life London . London & Prov. Law.. Marine. .. .......... Med. Dwild & Gen. Life Minerva • Monarch • • New Equitable Pelican • • • • Phoenix Professlonal Life.. • • .. Provident Life .... • ... Rock Life .... • • .. • • .. Royal Exchange Sun Fire Ititto Life United Kingdom .. Universal Life ... Victoria Life • . .• • Name of Company. 71. per c. 71. 148.6 d. bs 4. p.c. & bs. 153.0 d. 41. per cent. 7e. 10s. 71. 10s. 51. 5 pr ct.& bs. Instralasia.. 1/. 16s. ss. 5% per cent. 11. 41. per cent. 6 per cent. 51. per cent 51. per cent 121. per cent. 14s. & 2/. bs p. ct. &bs. 2s & 2s 'wpm 51. per cent. 4s. per share, ii. ss. I8s.& bs. 4% per cent 61. per cent. 51. per cent. 6* per cent . . 5 / P. ct. 51. per cent. 51. per cent. 12;4, per c. 76. P. c. & bs P : c. & bs. 11. 14s. & bonus. 5/. & bonus. 51. & bonus I INT-S TOCK Dividend per Annum. OZ. per cent Z s. d. 500 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 1 0 0 50 0 .1 100 0 0 50 o e 50 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 20 0 0 100 0 0 5 0 0 Stock. 20 0 100 0 500 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 50 0 25 0 50 0 100 0 50 0 20 0 5 0 10 0 Bank of Egypt ...... Bank of London .. British North American Ch. Bk. Ind. Aust & Ch. City .. Colonial Commercial of Loudon. Eng . Scot. & Aust. Ch. Lond. Cns.r. Bk. of Aus. Do. New .... . ... London and County Lon. & Eastn. Ilnkg, C. London Joint-Stock Londn and Westminatr Nat. Provincial of Eng. Ditto, New .. Ditto ditto Nationt.l Bank .. New South Wales Oriental Bank Corpora. Ottoman Bank Provincial of Ireland Ditto, New.• :•• :::. lonian•••• • • .• •• • • • • •• South Australia .. -• .. Union of Australia.... Union of Hamburg.... Union of L0nd0n...... Unity Mutual .. Western Bank or Londn. Name of Company Commercial Do. Preference East and West India.. Grand qurry D. & Canal Po. Loan Notes Do. 5 per cent. Prcf. London ... • ....... St. Katharine •....... • outhampton Victoria .. .......,. Ditto New........ 6 5 0 100 0 0 5 0 0 Stock. fo 8 0 . do . 25 0 0 100 0 0 50 0 0 20 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 @ 20 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 50 0 0 'lOO 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 1 g 0 g 1 20 0 0 50 0 0 20 0 0 25 0 0 20 0 0 100 0 0 10 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 0I 1 51. per cent. Of. p. c. & bs. 41. per cent. 51. per cent. 101. per cent. 41. per cent. 101. per cent. 61. per cent. L. 2% p c. & be I 6 a. per cent. SID 5/.per cent. 20'. per cent. 101. per cent., 41. p. ct.&bs. 81. per cent. 51. per cent. I N. per cent. 211. per cent. Z s. d. 50 0 0 91 11 0 0 r 25 0 0 4 all 5 15 0 25 0 0 2 5 2 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 _ 5 0 0 50 0 _ 0 0 5 a ll 40 0 _ all 5 [ol.pcB/ .bs. 15 0 0 .1 50 0 a 1 100 0 0 100 0 0 DOCKS. Dividend per Annum. 51. pr cent. 6/. pr cent. 41. per cent. 51. pr cent. LIST OF SCOTTISH CO3l Name of Company. Rank of Scotland .... British Linen Company Caledonian Bank ..... City of Glasgow Bank Clydesdale Bank .... C .mmereial Bank .. Eastern Bank.... •• •• Edinb. & Glasgow.... National Bank ...... 4%1. per cnt. 4 per cent. 51. Os per c. Dividend per 47 5 .1 50 0 0 _ `lO 0 0 39 0 0 37( 210 0 - 13 0 0 210 0 12 10 0 61 20 0 5 12 10 0 - 2 0 0 2? 20 0 0 - 20 0 3 40 0 - 1 0 0 14 10 0 - o 10 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 Annum, 7i. per cent. 81. per cent 81. per cent 51. per cent. 53y1• p tent. 71. per cent. 61. per cent. 3341. p cent. 634 per cent. bl.per cent 51. per cent. 81. per cent. 71. por cent. 8% /. pr cent. 41. per cent. lOt. per cent. 61. percent. 5/. per cent. 61. nor cent. cont. 61. per cent. 61. per cent. 71. per cent. I North of Scotland Bank Royal Bank of S co tl. Union Bank of Scot. ... Western Bank Alliance Fire and Life.. British Guarantee • .. Caledonian Fire Incur . City of Glasgow Lite.. Colonial Life ......... Edinburgh Life Tnsur. Eng. & Scot, Law Life Life Assoc. of acotland National Fire and Life North British Insur... Northern Assurance Co. Scottish Provincial .... Scottish Union Ins rnc. Standard Life .... 1 7%1. prcent. 51. per cent. Amount of Share. £ s. d. Stock. Rtock. Stock. 100 0 0 100 0 0 25 0 0 Stock. Stock. 50 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 TAXIES' Amonnt of Share. X a. d. 100 C 0 100 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 20 0 0 500 0 0 25 0 0 5 0 1100 0 0 20 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 10 0 0 100 0 0 25 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 50 0 0 49 0 0 10 0 0 200 0 0 1 20 0 0 50 0 0 20 0 0 50 0 0 sld 0 4 10 0 0 _ 50 0 ; Paid. I Pri, 1 . West Indies' Ice. (except Ha vana and .4 s. d. all 9 18 15 0 1, 50 0 0 all Venezuela . )9% Grey Town., 18% New Granada Chili ..... Peru .. , California .. 6 50 25 20 o I 66 0 I 2 20 7) 0 3 50 0 0 - 10 0 0 4 20 0 0 4 35 0 0 7' 10 0 0 - 5 0 22 $0 o I 1 0 - 15 "a 0 I i 25 0 0 - all I 3 ' all I 6' O 2' O 41 O 4, Paid. I Prii Z s. d. Stock. Honduras • • Nassau .. .. r . Y; I Mexico 1 — Madeira .. eneriffe W.C.of Africa 14 British North America .. • United States United States British North America .. United States •% British North America • oo o oo o o 5 0 0 Btock. 50 0 G t 20 0 0 - 14 0 0 - 'BICES. . MISCELLANEOUS. Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. p r i ce, Annum. Share. Acadian Charcoal Iron •• 10 0 0 2 0 0 . African Steam Ship .. • • 20 0010 0 0 Assam Tea .......... 81. rer cent. 50 0020 0 0 Auction Mart •••• • • • • 2%/per cent 50 0 0 Australian Aqriculturl Australian Trust .... 7%1. pr cent, 10 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 9 0 0 0 -- Austrinan Uoyal Mail British Americ an an Mint.. 51. . I p l e . r l e O e s n . t. 510 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 all _ Canada ............. 6/. perc ent. 100 0 0 3 4 2 0 : 1 0 1: 0 0 1 343"6 Do. 5 per cent Bonds 51. per cent Stock 100 0 0 61.6/. ppeerr cent.cent. Stock Ditto, 5 per cent bds 5 , per cent. 6 6 ppeer. bds 1784 tt t oe o ce e kk k 10 : 0 0 oo Ditto, _... — Ditto, 100 0 0 ito% Ditto, 6p c. bds 1876 61. per gent. Crystal Palace ...... 0 all 2 Crystal Ditto Preference.... 71p r. 5 0 0 City Navigation Bonds 3 1. /. per cent Cent. 5 0 0 Crys. Palace of France s St_oe o k I LL 00 all —4O 0 glectric Telegraph ~. is • R tl e v a e g r . s T i 0 . Co• , Stock. 100 0 0 90% Eng.&Aus. Cop. Smelt. E k n glr per cent. , 5 0 0 all Ditto New ..... nrY 50 0 o all Equitable o o 1 2 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 ___-- Gen. Revers. & Invest. 51. c —and 11. 100 0 0 100 0 0 Gen. I. Sc. Col. (Lim.) p 26 0 0 5I per cent. 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 all 26 Gen •SteamNavigation 104 per ct. & 15 0 0 14 0 0 25 London Gen. Om n ib us 12/. per cent. Hudson's 8ay.... •• .• 5L p er cent. 100 l 0 0 all Flungerford ...... •• 51. per cent. 21. _ 55. 10 0 0 all Stock Stock 0k 0 all 3% Lon. Ne. &N a . Mauso. all London Reversionary lb 0 ii 10 0 0 all 3% Mex. &S . Am erican 25 0 0 5 N.S.W. Gov.sp.c. 0 0 6 Nat. Discount Comp• • _ 6d. 1 0 0 all 102% Nor. Bri. Australasian 51. per sent. North of Europe , 21 0 0 all 2 2 % s p t e cu p . . RI. per cent 20 0 0 17 10 0 14 Priee'sPatent Ca nd. Co 5 0 0 all 2% 50 0 0 all & Oriental Steam 71. per cent. 50 0 . 6 , Pen. — 0 10 0 0 14% Ditto New Tn.. Soc I% /. or cent ;IX, t; ..^, ~, Reversionary • • . Peel Itiver.Land&Miu. New ...„ 4y. Pr ccie. 130 0 0 98 0 (.? -- Ditto ... Royal gall -Itown ll. 2. itaiirt, 100 0 0 :(.1 0 0 67% Sco ttish Aus. Invest l5l. p-r cent. 1 0 0 all 6 o uth Australian Land 71. per cent. 25 0 0 all Trust and Loan Comp. .7% 1. pr cent. 20 0 0 5 0 0 i Vas Diemen's Land lO3. 100 0 0 28 10 0 16% i Vic. Goy. 6 per ct.. Eds 6 per cent. \ / STOOK EXCHANGE.—There was a limited busit iess but 14 prices were steady. Chesterland Bi r k en h ea d , 181 - -Dover, 22g— Great Western of Canada, 251—Sbeffields, ;.? it 14. SEABORNE MAILS. [When the date for making up a mall falls on a Sunday ; , the mall remains open until the day following; except In the case of • the India mail, via Southampton, which, on such occasions, is mad,* up the evening previous.] FOR. FRG la • --___.... I Made up at W hence By what When I:y what the des- Post-Office. patched. Vessel. expected I; Vessel. • • ............. I Lisbon ^ ilth,l7th, & • Spain South- .Alham- ampton bra Jan. 14 ,Madrid Gibraltar 1 , 4 Gibraltar -1 v alts itA Egypt .. ••• • I 4th & 20th 4th and 20th of • Ceylon ••• • 31 of the South- Terri, :Rlpoll li India • Mauritius month. , via Ceylon) , China South- Penang M the ... ••• .. Jan. 4., IRip o n • , • • Singapore Australla(via} .. Jan. 12 .. } South- Co'um. lii mania , ••i IA the Cape) • • amp ton bian Jan.— r envy Cape of Good Hope Mauritius - mouth W.S. Jan. 25 Cngland Ceylon 2 India Lisbon...• 1 1 1, Madeira CapedeVerds South li Brazil M Jan. 9.... [ ampton Tamar Jan. 12 Tyle 1 BuenosAyres Falkland Is - lands 1 West Indies - 1 e. (except LI a vana and Honduras). 2d let and and 17th Venezuela of the Ai South- Magda- 16th o f Id- 2 Grey Town , ampton lona th e O r inoco New Granada month. Chili .. month., ar.Jan- 4 J Peru California .. 4 Honduras South •• 16th of M Jan. 17 . 1 • ampton • • '''' the ........ i is assau .... ' ' month. Mexico .... South- Magda- Jan. h Orinoc , Havana .... 31 Feb. 2 • ... ' ampton lens arr. 4th Madeira .... I eneriffe .. i E Jan. 23 ..}. Pl y - Gambia Jan. 6 Candace i W.C.of A frica mouth i British North America .. E every Fri. Liver. } America Jan. 4 Africa pool United States er r 4t 4sll 1 United 1 Tan. 6 and Liver- British North E ' alternate Atlantic Jan. I nool America .. Tuesdays. - Atlantic United States ..} 6 British North M Jan, 14 South- Ara e.......- ...... amp ton .. . ...... America .. Canada .... } E lan. 27 .. Liver- Anglo- 1 g Anglo i. pool Saxon " an • - eaion ______=______ T 21-3forning. E—Evening. ' l 4 , rADVERTLSSWENT.I SIGHT AND Hastens SFACTACLBS, '% POWERFUL TELESCOPES, OPERA, B,ACE, AHD PEREpEcTITS I GLASSR9.—Messrs. S. and B. Solomons, opticians, 39, Albe* marle-street, Piccadilly. Obseive—opposite the York !fete)* By loor Majesty's Royal Letters Patent for valuable and Ice. extraordinary improvements in the most powerful and brilliant Telescopes, Camp, Racecourse, Opera, and per - spective Glasses, to know the distances. These telese.lopeil possess such extraordinary powers that some three and ei-half inches, with an ex t ra eye-piece, will show distinctly Jupit e r's - moons, Saturn's ring, and the double stars. With the same . telescope can be seen a person's countenance three miles and a • half distant, and an object from 16 to 20 miles. Th e y are of ilarger and ail sizes, with increasing powe rs accor d ingly.--The 6 Royal Exhibition, 1851. Valuable, newly-invented, very s mall, and known 1i mile s di s t ant; they answer powerful waistcoat-pocket glass, the size o f a walnut, by vehich a person can be seen every purpose on the race-course, and at the opera houses, country scenery, and ships are clearly seen a t 8 to 10 miles. They are invaluable for shooting, deer-stalking, yachting, to sportsmen, gentlemen, gamekeepers, and tourists, Opera, =ace -course , camp, and per s p ec ti ve g l asses, with wonderful Paid. Price. power. Newly-construaed Spectacle Lenses of est transparent power. The valuable advantage derived from this invention is, that vision becoming impaired is £ 8. d. the great.. too o 0 19910 s preserved and strengthened, and very aged persons are 100 0 0 227/0s enabled to employ their sight at the most minute is ccz• pation—can see with these lenses of a much less magnify* 2 10 0 31 15s and they do not require the frequent changes to 0 0 131 os in power -10 0 0 13/118 100 0 0 245i0s to the dangerous effects of further powerful assiciance -10 0 0 1211 7 s Persons can be suited at the most remote part of the world, a o 0 5/ 3s by sending one of the glasses out of their spectacles in a 100 0 0 1901 Os letter, and stating the distance from the eyes they can. read 2 10 0 5/ 5s 100 0 0 13910 s small newspaper print with it; and those who have 50 0 0 103/10 not made use of spectacles by stating their age. Desk 50 0 0 8 ./ir, s ness. New Discovery. The Organic Vibrator, an ex* 11 0 0 171138 traordin ary powerful, small, newly-invented instrum en t f o r ,/ 10 g 0 O s 1" d eafness, entirely diff erent from all others, to surpa s s any -2 0 0 4/ 58 thing of the kind that has been or probably ever 3an be, 3 0 0 51 5 8 produced. B e i ng o f the same colour as the skin, is not per -15 0 0 301 5s ooptible ;it enables deaf persons to hear distinctly at church 3 5 0 41 8s and at public assemblies ; the unpleasant sensation of singing 0 0 00 36:1100: noises in the ears is entirely removed; and it affords all the 1 4 0 2/ Os 200 21 17s assistance that possibly could be desired.-39, AdLentarle -203 1 0 0 1/ 15s 1.........reet, Piccadilly: Observe—opposite the York Heft. 1 0 0 11 16s 7 0 0 101 r BIRTHS. • OW A 801. On the 2d i ns t., the Hon. Mrs. Lambert. cl O o n t t h h o e 1 2 8 d t ils o t t .,. , M o r t s. Fuller. l F 3 r , an N ei o s rfoik.eet tr, Park-lane, the wife of Maples Haworth, Esq. OP A DAUGHTER. On the Ist inst., at Stonehouse, Devon, the wife of Colonel Rimington, Royal Engineers. On the 2d inst., at 28, Avenue-road, Regent's-perk, the wife of Henry Parker, jun., E sq. On the 2d inst., at Aspenden, Harts, the wife of the R ev . A. P. Sanderson —twins. MARRIED. On the 3d inst., at St. George's, Hanover-square, Luke D. Addington, of St. Martin's-lane, to Helen Eliza, the eldest daughter of John Sandilands, of Conduit -street. On the Ist inst., at St. Marylebone Church, the Rev. J. Henry Kirwan, Fellow of King's College, Cambridge, to Frances, the third daughter of the late Vice -Admiral Dacron. DIED. On the 2d inst., at Hampton-court Palace, Henry Joseph St. John, son of George Richard, third Viscount Boling broke. On the 3d inst., at Tower Villa, Queen's -road, Regent's park, John Sharp, Esq., aged 61. On the 3d inst., at St. Alban's Villa, Victoria-road, Kensington, Captain Finlay, aged 77. On the 2d just., i❑ Albemarle street, suddenly, Edwd. Lee Warner, Rig H.E.1.C.5., aged 68. On the 2d inst., at Surbiton-hill, Kingston, Surrey, Anne, wife of C. Pressly, Esq., Chairman of the Board of Inland Revenue, Somerset -house. On the Ist inst., at Surbiton, Surrey, John Young, Esq., aged 75. On the lst inst., at Boothby Hall, near Spilsby, t Rev. J. Walls, aged 78. :of d Publi4bed by MURDQ YOUNG', No. 112, Strand, Printer, at 27ie Sun Office, No. 112, Strand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, in the cowl ty or Middlesex, Monday, January 5, 1857. Paid. Z 8. d. Paid. I Price, X R. d. all 'l5O 0 0 1 8 , all _ 12 12 0 2 , too 0 0 42 15 0 41 0 0 43 10 0 4l 0 0 all 52 0 0 4 16 0 0 1 , all 1 100011 4 0 0 Paid. I Fri,