The Sun. — London, England, 1817-03-13 00:00:00

. . • . • :•lilo,l, Mai that of a prisoner,' vrbb, cm" . to ,ulitary confinement, bail made a sort paition of 0 spider in his cell, which, when the poke destroyed. What now ap.: b.e titeCtels of th e c(te '? So far from any It, tir e prisoner, at his own request, u r n s the company of another ; and the Hon. cotoplaint now was, that he was al enjoy that society,—(Hear,hear, hear !) ie Hitn• Oditleman (Mr. Bennett) now that lie should he deprived of that soc iety, and if so, let the House and ;us recollect, that it was the Hon. Gentle._ r.-13nnietr) who destroyed his spider.— Tar, acid a laugh.) , atioa tilts then agreed to. TIIE SIX HUNDRED PETrrioN , L l'wHoßils having mowed the Order oi` the tes,mting the adjourned debate on the Pe - I:hich lie had presented, A lAtttit, with the leave of the House, : 4 '," sl3 FY to sta te , t h at he had caused Petitions to be assorte d, and chilisrd lit their form and contents.—The total' tithe Petitions Wil% 527. Of these, there 14 Which no name at all was subscribed tutee two t o whi c h no name was sub the same %beet O n which the Peat 10113 dim. There were 28 iu the same lan ql copies fro m the same foi'm, which the , Plreatly rejected-468 were!Pri"l" Of the (emainin g ''S, there were I im 4itAg,e'witl t the . Petition from Hit :it the douse had rejected—four were in f another Petition, which the House this Session, and thirteen in various 'hi 'be' On the the first question to he to the Petition to which no 'll)%cribed, and as to it, the questlo" to ut. to the House w"s , th3t tit without any name affixed to it should .0(1, ile observed, that unless die i; " ar mlet would .press tide question, or !I, Mtion, it would be better to pass over "ice a Poitiou to which no name wa, e • i•PRKEH..--Tlic next question to be pit! ki t 1 ., je M te) th e two Petitions to ‘vhieli there Nf n nt ‘re, i tire on t h e sae slue( on which the 3 written. tollte 451LRIIRAGII Said, th at as t h e H ouse hall , :1411,11.. Positive d ec i sion on Petitions of this tre a t., ;( l in the saint &banner :i t l / 4 4 (b 4Katt.--The next q ues ti on t o be Pt,l 141riti(41 t" be 8 iftlitions Lind Hi to these' Lie I that they do e t I t Ote t ( -.. 1 -4 1114 Tpiestiutonis, the debate was 'li to"" be re- Ocit 1. - le 0 1 , r i 4i 01), r; r~ ~~t~ ' ,~ Pc- nut said,. that the ohjecti.°,? l'l'oose out with saying that t."_': Was so ivay represent the, peoPic that the ' aa g°ing as far as. to st,y which lot...receive any Petition . 011 of the inn in the repieset.ltait:ii already igoation of the Chair `l",,.,___ anti at those practices of bribery Ile elo.:tion of M em be rs t o "pre ht that I ' fiinei Only suspeefed; but in our fully exposed. (tut on lie same , wou d d 1 of li ctate the rejection 1 ieb • h e contained the words to "P,,nveYed .itiniadversion would be c o nveyed had expressed indignation to eiirrtipt practices. .:irds not Othersat 017- ..)etitions, as Containing • n tevances r 4 ni/ i l the statement of tit'" itisam that. r . ''tit to; e -4 ''y it or , i i i Wilt prayed, and it was for the tYch e ., o .' 4 .a 41 been in•iodoced merelycould ti 4-4 "4111 ting the Flonse.--if thisisci SC *l 4 l u ‘ I. :, ' o ', lie ali o red it to ht! a , more h e , ! '" ,1 e; 1 ,1 id'e..‘l than the other; and yet,, on'. % .4 fletl tt ! C e i if 11t h'4l'lle Petitions which ;led -,'l'atin,'„-,l',.°lljectionable words also cont"'ve. 1,1414 -. 2 ni real grieVilleeSrtliat part of the t Itilktol,.l),lieli slated these grievances ought 'no ) reteet i". 11,' 4 a eillSe, til b' overlooked anti • i he felt irliiii,t,i'"olol.4iiie:l of 1 1:e difficult y-vvb ell n ant 'll4taie.4lll4 the [louse on .1 his-subject., frot. c. " 0 4 1 , 4 ?" t'a account of the variety•of I tie ' ° ut e ~ ~itltitilliimWillt poiat, he might to direct his °"''''' t it 1",,°"141 'ittention oi, the flionse• At any •Icaliii 'lltril hihl , o m i t the. House ,i, ,s tat , ~, r, y necessary • , __ ._ be apt i n 1, ,*,ntie. role as.to the hinguage. . 1 " t5l„ etittnas s enable lii ~ ,ritiii.. ~ , 4) a s to . ~. fi nd 'tir w, , ilitlV C llyluillt9 that they might ,41.(?,.1; the Lible of the lltttl§e• i to, the ::tlitiottl. `‘l'ls%l,, said', that the oltieetmn ' f .1 11t il' 41 W 'ls Iltitt the Petitioners went out° tart illYi 11)11 bruit/Ott into their Petitions irrer . iilrt "ier . for the express purose °t Casting 4 1 k il ii, Still itlSltitS 'Tull the House. • ne- read, Ivilith I_llaliee, that part of one of the Petitions jKittritplled the debates in the Ilouse tetliotis, t 4 ifieti tj e4 t , '4,411(1 disg,witing. Alitter mor e clearly I,!4,llea't,t!,e Loold- not -be „conceived. —Het!!! ' kit 1 "'what the Iloilo') 1 1„-i tto , . ra,ble Baronet. (Sir . I ia• 't(lntred as to the House prescribing 11 1' i h " uf 1 ~,,, . 41 th,, " „„,..age, 0, "alio, in some rule ill'l4 islittge.woultl I t h. . e 'bi ► • it was ilt" vit . t t ,_ ems. _.e 0, jection? i•, , that v 1 4,4tiiitliii;lins: ,ti1.1,61,11.ti 'Fol. ti:lineal'ilynTt.st 'el etlvaelli yPlMl:nes'sili):lle I,„is.', lit ,h,..e..t.4:.ittoirElbea, or sentiments . k t ‘ Itti'sie .‘,ll:ilitkixe 411"ec:a(1, tOs c a s t `'s absurd. The ho 1 N il I tr th e Esvti;,h ease as it came before it, t,iiii3Of 'grievithetel )11 coiltitilieti a, bona Jude expre - ( ) ,, q t kt to the L k ! , or contained any matter in - 11,e'e,',41ettatirltp. `.l.'",e. Thete were various shales. titeli:',4uanee of ' il lrta he made in offensive terms, li,tit;lttat,, iLit`ll:l9lvitinight he , stated withtint t 3 411.1,(41 :1% ,tainiii- house must consider every it. 1 :'ta'lce 1g by itself as In its language, It. k , , ti , . and all the cirsunastanees attentling .t,. , itr e an Slittsil'qtt'l rh an nil Court of velitch it could Ns,. -all'esehed." It wool(' sit. and be ar its con li 'We ter ms anti objected to in the grossest 1 4t a lO 4/4 Of, iibiki: ?. W. inns 14)11f) e pmt ft". Pttit.o diS It not natol 111 tl ulet tiraw„ I " 11 h ad _eel) advisedly and Itt,,, i , t " 1 copies (~. ."P in the particular terms, o„ll.'lierftii „ititistr't it bad been circulated with tfil,il,%tven th e ~,Y to (11 purrs of the kiAg mi,(l:g eire,opilel7st remote 'Were not the ti r , t ," i ' l '4 reetittiniel'i►l ac.companied by a communi tlett).tted,h, tic frOU) a society, he cold(' til t t i 1 4 at l e 4 t ite 'l"n, Baronet (Sir P. Bur -I)4lll.4toattii,B:llPe'l with a fac- simile of "' II 4ti gte ? If the house were in- any Case td relax its rules . , it ouglit the, petitioners inteodednot to insult the !louse , ' .acrd. not ;in a case, like t'ae present,. where the tern were purposely and carefully' selected, thos'e which were thought Worse than the• House could possibly. tolerate.—(Hear, hear, hear If the House were.to attempt t any such Cuing as to lay down a rule as to the language and words which it should consider ohjectionable, it would only give those persons' an opportunity of choos ing words by which any sneh rule might he evaded, anil then, they would come to (he House With language quite as,•offetisive, or more so, and say that it was not within the rule.—(llear, hear,' hear !)- 7 ,—00 the whole, As it appealed to he the duty of the House to maitultio its dignity, aud to stand by those rules which their forefohers had . observed, be thought it would not he enough simply to negative the motion, but that the House should mark its iodignation at such conduct ; and Ice therefore moved, as an amendment, " that these Petitions be rejected." • Lord COCHRANE submitted that the Hon.MCIII - (Mr. Wynne) should state particularly what the words were which, when contained in a Pe tition, would made, the noose reject it ; and whets this was once stated, then it would be time enough for the House to express its indignation if the language so declared objectionable was re peated. The Noble Lind then► said, that the House had deceived : 1 •:.); expectations of the peo ple, by adopting measures to suspend their liher ties,,instead of attending to their gt ievances. He maintained in the face of Ministers, of the House, and of the Country, that there had been no, riot or distiohance to justify the measures resorted to, but that a mere clamour ant', alarm had been ex cited to rally the men of property in the country round the Ministers, by working out the fears of those„who'had weak and feminine nerves.—(A inugh.)—The only plot was between the Miuis tors. and the dealers in paper-money—they were the Spenceans, and the landed proprietors would be their victims. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL animadverted on the most extraordinary speech of the Noble Lord (Cochrane). It seemed, unless some strange fraud had been practiced, that so far front the Consti tution'being Suspended, to-morrow tloire was to be a meeting, of the inhabitants of - IVestrniuster, to petition' ot the dismissal of his Majetsty's Mi tristers.—(A laugh.)When the Noble Lord said there was no riot to justify'the pleasures' which the Legislature had adopted; it seemed as it the. Noble .. Lord• had just. come from some distant country, and was ignorant of all that had hap pened here. The question before time Ilmi•e writs, - whet,her it was to permit language of a na ture soittsuLing, that the endurance of it must degradelbent. in the eyes of the country. He shoUld thetefore giee'his most hearty vote for the amentlinent. Mr.IIIAUTIN thollgitt it mini(' he better merely to negative the motion, than to have any amend-. nient. . Sir Grt,t3ser iIEATHCOTE thonghfit would nothe very courteous towards the country, if the Horse should. reject Petitions merely on account of the language. As to that passage which descrkbed.thel debates in the. House as IlkguSiing, would., merely merely make this one observation—that on this day, which was appoint, d for the consideration of 500 Petitions front the people of England, most of the members, instead of attending in their places, had retired comfortably to take their din tiers, and left . the Petitions to their fate. This was treating the petitioners with contempt. ,Mr..BATHURST said, tharthe absent Members, a s % - i , ell'as those then present, knew the nature of• tl.e objections to the Petitioni—ohjcetions an which every Memher had already' made up .his mind. It wits therefore no insult to the people. The only instilt in question was the one offered to the House by the language of the Petitions. The Petitioners; if they chose, might easily re-state their complaints in proper language, and then - they would be received. Mr. ABEHCROMBIIt put" it to those who com plained of the thinness of the House, whether the. House hail not something to Complain of as to the.conduct of the Petitioners ; there was no right which he held so sacred as the tight of Peti tion ; and the conduct of these Petitioners' had . a direct tendency to bring the riOtt of Petition into contempt,.—(llear, hear !)—The Petitioners well knew that their Petitions must be rejected, and the `[louse, on behalf of the people of England, wax , tailed upon to reprobate their conduct. — (Hear, hear,!) After a few words from Mr. BABtNGTON, Mr. JONES, Mr. C. SMYTH and Lord IliNnitsto, the Motion was negatived, and the amendment agreed to without a division. The ,Sesatuta.—,-The next class was the 468 printed.petitions, and the question as to them, whether they should be received. WYNNH rose to more, that these Peti tions should beTejected, and to express his sur prise that the [Jon. Baronet should have presented such Petitions to the House, after the repeated decisions that printed Petitions could not be re. ceived. There was' no rule more strongly esta blished, than that which ordered that no printed . Petitions should be received by the House. That rule WaS begun to he acted on in 1656 ; it was rccogniaed in 1 7 93, a nd after w ards so late us the year 1813, in'thegease.of a printed Petition from •Nottingitam, on which occaNion the li on . Baronet had been himself one of the tellers on the division that then took place, When• the rule was confirmed by 73 votes against 11, and a few days afterwards, a petition from '0 Majca Cart Wright, praying for leave to pie sent a printed petition, was rejected. lie %visited I the entries on the Journals in these C3SeS to be read. (The Clark then read the entries.) If the rule nvere not already establiShed, what now took place Would have rendeted it necessary. Con: shirring that.the House had, so late as 181 3 , he could only think that these printed Petitions were now sent to be rejected, and, it possible, to ex cite, some exasperation in the- 'Nose. The fact %Nos:established on the Re'pott of the Secret COM meittee, that this was one of the. means tesnrtetl fiA.lor.the purpose of exciting .to sedition and re- . hellion. The House was therefore called upon, on this occasion, to mark its -resentment at such Petition; being ittiry Pres:, tiled. He rttor'eti " that these leti4iatts be rejected." • . . Sir W. GE Aki thoUght.the House shOuhl pause before it took airy step oniihis subject. He con ceived that the.order of 1636 referred to private petitio4s, anl.did not exactly bear on the present the subsequent milers,: the. House had atlopfeil the orders referring to •printed:petitions on Chair own jodttment, and:not on the Authority of the ordei of 165 G. The House %vas, thdefore, now to act, not upon authority, but ,on,itt;own judgment. Although Ire ditteredvntirely from the Seutitttelltil ' colltained in the petition, he eoul4l not see . 014 t. their was any good reason for not re ceiving printed. petitions ; and, at present, he sari , no reason to reject the petitions DOW before the ; , t . Mr. WY NAV AIN;1 QUIN 'contended, that the Order of I 6:ifi reler to such petitions as the present, which %vete the petitions of private.individuals, and clearly the petitions allotted to in that cha racter. : • Sir F. Bunt:lett contended at some length, that t he. order of 1656 did not refer to any petitions but those on private subjects, and that Unit order was not It standing order; that even if it had been a standing order• it ought to haVe no force, as it Was made by the Parlianientl of Oliver Cromwell, in which no Members sate without the leave of his soldiers ; Hod, thee efure, eoold not be,considered as in any rational sense a fair representitaion of the people; that the eise of 1793 was no authority fur reit*.l i irsit of printed petitions-,becansethe li+mse then badmen come to ,any vote or any decision, the motion having been Withdrawn ; that the only deci-, sion on the sohject was that in the year 1813, which was faulty, as it Went on the supposition that the order of 16'1: was hilly established and applied to printed fictitious co; public suldects ; that any or der against the reception of plinted Petitions must he in contravention to the Bill of Rights; that the dra:isions of the House were not irrevoca ble ; that it was now, therefore, a question of reason, and - not of authority, and on that ground that there was no reason why a printed Petition, with real manuscript signatures, should not be received ; on the contrary, that it had Many ad vantages over a written Petition, as being more legible, and not liable to alterations after being signed ; that in 1813 the House of Lords had re ceived a printed Petition from Barnstaple, al though had entered on its Journals that the case shoniel- not be drawn into a precedent; and, finally, that the Crown received printed Petitions. On these grounds. he was resolved to divide the House opus the motion. Lord CASTLEREAGII observed, that if the ob ject of the 1-lon. Baronet was that the Honse should receive the petitions in question, his speech was very ill calculated to attain that object. The fact w as , that petitioners caniq to the House in the Same spirit with which di'e MIL Bart. had sPcken, naMely, to procure the rejection of the petition. If the lion. Baronet was disposed to cavil abeint' the words of the Order of 1656 against printed. petitions; at least he could not do so with the usage of the House—he could not get lever the deleisiou in Nl3, when the House had ex pressly come to a decision against receiving printed petitions.. ndeed the Hon. Baronet had gone . tne' oat, i eAraiettclii search, au.' thority, MIA the instance which he produced (if any - auttredt y was wanting),, provedb that it was against the orders to receive a printed petition, for thete was en express entry that the cue should not be tlrawn into precedent. lie conctirred•enthely with the Hon. and Learned Gentleman in thinking ) that a systematic course wits pursued to bring the right of p e tition into contempt, and to make it the means of disturbing the public peace— (Hear, hear, hear !)—The dignity of Parliament rebquiren that these Pending; should be rejected. . There never was a moment at which Parliament could equivocate less than at present, and Members would abandon their public ditty it' they lent them selves to such Petitions, Which were sent for no other purpose than in the hope of effecting a re volution in the country. Mr. T. SMITH was of opinion, that the Hon. Baronet was taking that course which would tend to defeat - the right of petitioning more than tiny other that could be adopted. The precedent of 1813 was founded on former precedents, vehicle. 'totted to give influence And respectability to the right ofpetititnuiig. Sir E. BeYooes said, that without referring to any precedents, the wording of the petitions, which were nearly all alike, afforded the strongest presumptive proof that, they did nut contain the sense of the people. Mr. BOSWELL wits Of the same opinion. That helpless elhl tnatl (Major Cartwright), who was the polar star of Reform, as he was called by the worthies of Palace Yard, tired with his stationary pos i t i on , (tad becoMe a wandering star, and had visited the manufacturing towns, shedding his po litical influence, and urging the people its every possible way' to forward his views. But these petitions were, on the face of them, so many for geries, and Were not to be viewed without the greatest suspicion. It had been 'remarked, that one of them had the name of a very respectable overseer at the head of it, and they had heatd of the softer sex adding their signanites- too, in the case of the Liverpool petition. He could tell the House, that there was another petition which had the advantage of a name of equally good report ; for it wits signed by a Ur. Cannon:--qA laugh.) Mr. PETER MOORE spoke in favour of the pe tition. •_. . The /lame then divided Ayec . . 4 Noes Alajoritr., -52 On our return to the (41!levy, the Clerk was reading the heads of a numher of other petitions of the same kind, Which had Previously been ab stracted it(the Journals. They were severally dered to lie on the table. • The Mutiny and Matine Mutiny Bills,were read a second time, and ordered to be committed t 0 .4 morrow , The Silk Bounty Bill was read a third time, and passed; a s was also the Indemnity Bill. Th e Lords' Amendment to the Treasonable Practices, and Snilort' and Soldiers' Seduction tveie read anti agreed to; The other Orders brine disposed of, the House adjourned. • T I?, . . ORDER OF 'Mg EMPER6S.NAI', - ): EON', ADDEE'SSE. SY 0 ENERAL EOVN+ MONTIIOLON, To St ;t lICOSON LOWE, Elitflitl GOVEEkoIt OF TO ISLAND or SI I. .:LENA. ..6ENERAI.,-I hare receireclitite Treitty of the 341(4 August, concludettbetween his Britannie Majesty, the Emperor of Austria, :the Emperor of Ituisia, and the King of Prussia, which accumpanied your letter of the,.2A of Juty. he An', peror Napoleon . pretests against the contents of that treaty ; he. is net Are prisoner of-finglaud., Att,e4ay... ing placed his abdication in the hands of the ltepresentativeit of the Nation, fur the adrantalre °Pile Czmilittaio4 iv/opted by.the Preach peuphs, andand , iit fitvoitr of inn, he repaired vo luntarily an 1 freely to England, with the view of living there. as a private- indiVitrual, under the ,protection' of the British laws.. ,Theviulation of everylaw 'cannot constitute a right. The person of 'the .Entperor Napulean is actually in the power of England, hut be neither has been, .nor Is, in thepower of Austelaa.ussia, and Prnisia, either in fact or of right, even according to the 'lairs i r customs Of England, which never'in eluded, in the exchange of prisoners, Ruisians, Prussians, Atistriarts, Spaniards, 'tic, Portuguese r though united to these . poweis by treaties of alliance, and making war conjointly with them. . . The Convention of the 2d of August a cuncloded • fifteen. clays after the Emperor wits in England, tannot have of tight any effect. It exhibits Only a spetacle of the coalition of Ito f?orgreatest Powers of Euro . Pe for the oppressi.,n of a :iii,rie l!ard4 ?—a coalition which the,opetsion of every nation and all the principles of sottrfil motality The Emperors of Austria and lins.;la, and the King vi Prnssia x having neither in fact or in right any claim over the person of the Emperor Napoleon r emild decide nothing re• specting him. Had the Emperor Napoleon in.ett in the power of the Em peror of At:stria, that Prine . e would have recollected the re= lations which religion and natute have fornied btlimeli a father and a sou►—relutiotis which at•e nei•er violated with .• purity. He would have recollected that Napoleon haJ four lintel restored to him his throne: viz, at Leuben in I!:7—at Lune villein lEo4—when his armies were under the walls of Vienn —at Preshurgh hi 1806, and at Vienna in 1809, when his armies had possessinn of the capital and three-fourths of thu monarchy ! That, Prince would have recollected the prutes.; tallow' he made to Napoleon at the bivouac in Moravia lit 1306, and at the interview in Dresden in 1812. Had the person of the le:Mi:Hi . Napoleon been in the power of the Emperor Alex a nder, he would bare recollected the ties of friendship contracted at Tilsit, at Erfurth, and during twelve years of daily coriripondcdce. lie would Mire recollected the Crindnct of the Emperor NapoleUtt the day after the battle of Austerlitz, when, though he could have ►uade hin►, with the wreck of his army, pi= saner, contented hiurp! If with taking his parole, and allowed him to operate hie retreat lie would hare recollected the dangt rs to which the Emperor Napoleon personally e*post:d himself In order to extingui;h the fire at Mosc,,w, and tip preserve that capital for hirii—a%stirctily, that Prince' mould sieter hare viollted the duties of f►iendslcip dud gratitude towards *friend in inithyrinste. Hall the. person of the'Emperor Napoleon been in the rsowpe of the king of Prisssi.s, that Sovereign could n a lute forgotiJis 114tt it deist:44 , l'On t.iR r..stiP4ot; 41(Cei Co. I,:tit.4r of Friedland, to place another Psinte un the throne ut Berl lin. He would not hart , forgotten, in the ptetente of - a dik armed enemy, the protestations of Attnchwent mid the sruti mews of grutitude which he testified to him in Ist 2 at the interviews in Dresden. It accordingly appears from article* C and 6, of the Treaty of the 2d of August, that these Princes, being incapable of exercising any influence over the disposal of the Eniperor, who wai not In their power, a ccede to what may ht. done thereon by his Britannic ,Nlajesty, who takes upon himself the charge of fulfilling eery ohligatitin. These Princes hare reproached the Emperor Napoleon with having prefer red the protection of the English laws to thenl. The false ideas which the Emperor Napoleon bad formed of the rality of the laws of England, and of tire iittluenee of the opi- Won of a peat, getteruae, and free people ore?: their Govern-. Nara ) decided Wet to prefer Use protection of these laws ttt that of a fciher-in.low or an old friend. The Emperor Napoleon had Witt his power to Serttre, by - a diplomatic treaty, whatever was personal to himself, by put-. ting himself either at the head of the army of the Loire, or at the bead of the army of the Gironde, einiimatided by General ClauSel; but wishing, henceforth, for nothing but retirement arid the protection olthebtWs of a free State, either. English or Aanerkan, all stipulation appeared to him num:cc:n*4.. He conceited that the:English people wete more bound by a conduct which was, on hit part, frank, noble, and full of confidence, than they Witold have been by the most solemn trades. Ile has been deceived, bnt this rtilk Wilt for ever: cause true Britnnt to Minh, rind Will,. in the present as well as the future generations, be a pro.'/ al the bad faith of the English administration. Austrian surd Penistan Conintissiontell are arrived at St. Helena. if the object of their Miision be the fulfilment of a part of the duties which the. Emperor* of Austria and Russia have contracted by the Treaty of the tut of Anglia, and to take tare that the English agent*, in a s►nalt colony, in the widst of the ocean, de nut fail in the respect due to a Prince connected with their Sovereigns by the bonds of relationship and so many other ties, proofs of the character-which belong to these two Monarchs will be recognized in this proteedingl b►tt you, Sir, have declared that these Commissioners have neither the right nor *nattier of giving any opinion on what may he passing on this' lack! The EngliShlsterf have caused the Emperdr Napoleon to be trantporttd to St. Helena, at the distance: of 2000 leagues froth Europe ' rock, situated within the trop cs, attilSao leagtteS from any torninent, is Subject to the devour ihg heats of these latitudes.' It is cutcted with clouds and fogs during titre-04,mi% hs oft Ite li:at, arid IS stt once the must arid aud the must humid 'country ht the stpriet: Such u state is 'mutt inimical to the health of the Ettiperot, and hatred must Intro dictated the choice of this residence, as welt as the ittstructionS given by the Engtliit bliniStcri to.the M eets commanding in the 'dhoti: 'they Ibtli'e ti . en been ordered td Ball the Einpetor Naptife on Grierrat, av if it were wished to olinte hlin to etinsitier hint. self never le ving reigned iii France. rrason which devout:tett him dui to assume an ineor, , situ name, as he alight , have resulted to do on leaving weri these : Firs Magistrate ftir lift , ratite Repdblitf o:Lars th. the title id First Couldt he concluded the Prelitni- , trat irs of LArtidort aud the Treaty of Awieue 'w,ith the Kiug of that occAiil tleffineirto of thntli att i, bbserv e a, t Pearet t to h i or, 4110 \rvtltlte Pcittletnati'l invrttl I n e n Il'ltAt the wished Ir.'s his ()illy so( a%i'it.Pains r ta l n I' ht u I . : e.tr, f i p ar 16013, Tr! Sir F. l'stit 4 .1 y for r „, ii titio ns The s n‘ it i; Cie several Iteortling t ir "unifie r of th ()lie %% `'llter e wet, no th 11 't w " e wri«e t t,"gt!, ail(1 tttlti 144 lii4t~le%4"e ✓ 11. 1 nt I rej ected I d }ll Viottt i :i s* , it ;tee %hid, Sul th e Ita it f n, 11 . 61 " ma r tr) Lor1:1 (d'iv( 1 41' 4 s , tk . 1 „.. o , 01,,,,, w ii,ußrii ? .. r . 0'14; t : i llitit i r le ll l'et .1.0 , ii ( „,, , , i ally ' 1,10 ,1 li r,to l t 111 4 t ii j wa Icr 1 , r 1 , ,i 11 1 :(:(41,1 lir i e ! h , ,pl z, r I)oor ir , i 1 t4:l ~.i l le ilitli i 14 thr,,,N,'Pressed ,i 0 ' ei, , L'lll net 11, 1 ;f :' 'l it 't Pet ) 1 ' 1 , r, i, I' t i 41 4 k trr h , r , 1 w pi4, i ;i: I )te n 0, ,liar , ft 110 0 ,104 hi ll l . I CI ,'I I tiliel l ipo 1) , , I ~,, dlll t d , . c t e r l , ~ ill a ; 0 t itpri„, , e %11, 1 iot ri. P:tt,,ll If th,,, .0 i,,, '' ti..c,, , 'r4 , 1 os,, v , . le # .' 1,1. 1 1 l'‘,-