The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1833-04-23 00:00:00

EZ:bc Eibtrpooi 4tattllarb. TUESDAY 'AIOIIXLVG, APRIL 23, 1833. The Morning Herald of Saturday last informs us of a most vexatious case illustrative of the impolitic de tention of Dutch merchantmen by the British Govern ment. The facts are contained in a letter from the agents to Lloyd's, at Ramsgate, and are as follows: " The cargo of the Pauline is gradually melting away, and the vessel is some inches lighter in her draught of water, clearly showing that the sugar is in a rapid . state of decay, which this particular kind of sugar is liable to more than any other. We are of opinion that if this vessetremains here much longer, her cargo of sugar will release itself." This would be bad enough even if England and Hol land were at war, and the property so deteriorating and wasting solely belonged to our enemy; but far otherwise is it in this case, for the Herald continues to inform us that it is insured by British underwriters who will even tually have to bear the loss and make good the damage. The Pauline was bound from Demerara to Middleburgh, when she was captured by one of our cruisers and carried into Ramsgate. To see a Government thus preying upon its own subjects is one of those curiosities Which none but Whigs of the most liberal order could have reconciled to the refined notions of national policy. This is indeed cutting off the nose to be revenged on the face. WITH the exception of Lord Althorp's premature bud get, and his English tithe commutation bill, nothing has oc • curred in the House of Commons since Monday se'nnight that calls for any comment. Some hundreds of petitions drawn up, pro forma, against West India slavery, have been presented, which, if we were to judge of the people of England as a foreigner would do, and as Mrs. Trollope judges of the Americans, would force us to the conclusion that no other subject attracts public attention, from the Land's-end to the Orkney Islands, than the condition of our "poor dear oppressed black brethren" in the colonies. Slavery is one of those conditions in society for which we have a very strong abhorrence, and which it is desi rable to see rooted out; but we are much mistaken if there be not, in the name of liberty, and under the sanc tion of liberality, much more real slavery and op pression—much more tryranny and injustice—much more crime against the first laws of nature—toler ated and committed in this country than in all the slave countries on the face of the earth. It is true that we must: not justify one evil by another. We must not mix sand with the sugar which we sell under the name of free labour sugar, merely because our neigh bour is in the habit of doing so daily. This is fraud : it is robbery and cruelty combined. But on the other hand we should not, if imbued with a Christian spirit, traverse sea and land to find ideal objects of commisseration while the poor chimney sweep weeps under our windows at home, or a helpless debtor, with a wife and six children in the parish workhouse, pines in a wretched prison, at the suit of a merciless creditor, for a debt of fifteen shil lings. In such a:case, and there are thousands of such cases in England, the philanthropy that disports in the colonies, without looking at home, is spurious charity, if net barefaced hypocricy, playing a factious game for self ish purposes. THE noble Chancellor of the Exchequer, in terrorem of the announced motion of Mr. Attwood on the state of the country, was induced, or rather was compelled, to bring forward his budget on Friday last, and the public are now in possession of what the government—the whig government—the retrenchment ministry—the peace ad ministration—intend doing for them in this pleasant year 1833. Lord Althorp, after counting upon his fingers every penny he could possibly spare, and, as some think, (among the rest Sir Robert Peel,) a few more pennies than he can SAFELY spare, has condescended to remit taxes to the amount of £1,300,000. But the mode in which this is to be accomplished is in perfect keeping with all the other finance schemes of the noble Lord. He has, as usual, entirely lost sight of what ought to be the first consideration in reducing the taxes, and which has never for a moment been lost sight of by those who have within the last few years been con stantly imploring relief. He has forgotten that the working clasSes are those who feel most severely the pres sure of taxation, and that any reduction which does not remove this pressure is a delusion and a mockery of their sufferings. In considering, therefore, the most practicable mode of administering relief, the primary question should be, what is the taxed commodity in most general use, which is a universal necessary of life, and in the consumption of which the working classes bear the largest portion of the impost ? As far as we have the means of ascertaining, it is not complained that bread, or beef, or bacon, or even ale, are unreasonably dear at the present juncture, parti cularly when we reflect that the agricultural interest is suffering extremely from the poor-rates and other national burdens ; `but it is a proper subject of complaint that tea, sugar, and coffee, which are indispensable necessaries among thepoorer classes of the population, are enormously taxed, not only to the discomfort of the poor, but to the serious injury of the growers and manufacturers of these articles. This being the case, had Lord Althorp been at all de sirous to ameliorate the condition of the mechanic and labourer, he would have remitted some portion of the duty upon the necessaries of life. But this considera tion was not allowed to mar the more speculative and characteristically absurd propositions of- Lord Althorp's "financial statement." He has taken off various duties, -which, up to this hour, we have never heard complained of as grievances. The people demand cheap - food, and the noble Lord has abolished the tax upon tiles, just as if pantiles were pancakes, or an article of daily suste nance. He might with equal propriety have reduced the duty upon spinning tops and Dutch toys. The people of England complain that they pay an hundred per cent. more for their tea than is paid by the people of America, and-Lord Althorp (in order to relieve them) reduces the E Ll VE RPC duty upon cotton wool, which confers no benefit whatever upon any class of persons except those very American cotton growers who already possess so many advantages over us. The duty on cotton is five-eights of a penny.— It is now to be reduced one half, and the I:320,000 there by thrown away, goes principally into the pockets of our shrewd and thriving cousins upon the other side of the Atlantic, who will no doubt be exceedingly obliged by this mark of British. liberality. We speak more confidently upon this subject, for it is one in which the people of Li veipool have some interest, and those connected with the cotton trade, one and all, declare that the remission of the duty confers no boon whatever, and will not administer any relief to any class of his Majesty's subjects. This, then, is one of the egregious blunders which have marked the whole financial career of the noble Chancellor of the Exchequer. In confirmation of this our opinion, we beg Leave to subjoin the following, which has just been hand ed to us by one of the most extensive and intelligent merchants in this town "The alteration in the Cotton duty is simply a boon to the Americans. Nobody in this town expected it ; nobody sought for it ; nobody wished for it ; nobody thanks Ministers for it, and nobody is relieved by it. It is an encouragement of the American Cotton, to the detriment of East India, the import of which has been increasing ever since the duty of % was im pOsed upon American; thereby completely fulfilling the inten tions of those by whom the duty was imposed,—rendering us gra dually less dependent on America for this staple article of our manufacture. The American Cotton is chiefly on American account, and gives employment to American shipping and American seamen—the East India Cotton, on British account, entirely imported in British vessels, and employs British sea men, and is a return for British exports. The % was a sort of protecting duty to the importers of East India Cotton, on the faith of which a large number of vessels are now on their voyage to India. It is now proposed to reduce this duty to such an extent as must very shortly inevitably prevent the import of India Cotton. This, too, in the very face of the whole country calling out for a more extended trade with India !" The pitiful nibbling at the assessed taxes in favour of the large cheap shops, the monopoly warehouses of London, the rich shopmen, the Eliises, Morisons, and peo ple of that stamp—is another blunder! Who complained of the duty on shop windows ? The smaller shops pay no duty at all ; the large shopkeepers can well afford to pay; they can better afford it than any other class, and consequently they should be made to pay all their present liabilities and even a trifle more than they are at present subject to. Here then are £320,000 upon cotton, £244,000 on shop windows, and £37,000 on pan-cakes, we mean pan-tiles, making a totality of £601,000, ab solutely thrown away without either rhyme or reason, and which if it had been subtracted from the present enorm ous duty upon sugar, would have been hailed as a boon all over the country, especially by the working classes, and would at the same time have been gratefully accepted as an act of grace by the suffering planters of the West Indies. The reduction of £lOO,OOO in favour of foreign marine insurances is a pittance which it would be foolish to waste a drop of ink in-favouring with any further notice. It is not a pinch of snuff and a quid of tobacco, per week, to the sailors employed in the trade. The repeal of the tax upon clerks was never consi dered a grievance by any respectable merchant. Those who cannot afford it must be in a very deplorable state indeed, and the sooner they close their counting houses, and dispense with the services of their clerks, so much the better for themselves and their creditors. Then comes the reduction of the newspaper advertise ment duties, which although it is likely to put some £2OO or £3OO a year into our pockets, has nearly killed us with down right laughter. Does Lord Althorp know what a newspaper is ? He proposes to give us a reduc tion of £75,000 a year. The whole revenue arising from newspaper advertisements amounts to about £150,000,-3s. 6d. of duty being charged upon each advertisement. Had the noble lord reduced the duty to Is. 6d. we should have understood his meaning, for his plan would have been practicable. But he cannot go straight forward to his object like a sensible man. He is totally ignorant of the subject, and has allowed him self to be advised by some amateur dabblers in Maga zines who are as ignorant as himself. He proposes to charge 2s. for an advertisement if inserted once, Is. 6d. if inserted twice, and is. if inserted more than twice. If this scheme were practicable it would confer a bounty upon quackery—upon the venders of pills, balsams, and all the million of sickening and detestable drugs which are puffed, in the most extravagant and disgusting terms, in the most disreputable journals. It would be a boon in favour of these empirics and their agents, who gain a livelihood• by stuffing potions and poisons down the throats of the ignorant and unwary, thus encouraging imposition and swindling, which are already carried on to an enormous extent, and in which the - poorer classes are the readiest and principal victims. Such would be, we repeat, the effect of Lord Althorp's measure, if it were practical, which very fortunately it is not. The expense of hunting after first, second, and third advertisements, by the clerks of the stamp office, would be far greater than the amount of profit derived from the duty. It would beside lead to perpetual alter cations, vexatious complaints, and frequent overcharges, so that there would be no end to the difficulties of carry ing it into operation. It would be far better, and equally profitable to reduce the duty at once to is. 3d. or is. For our part we think there should be no duty at all upon advertisements. What is the paltry sum of £75,000 to a country like this ? Lord Althorp ought to blush at the confession that this pittance is indispensable for the safety of public credit. But if he must have it, we can tell his Loidship that he must also alter his plan and impose a fixed and unvarying duty—we propose on each advertisement, but if he should be hard pushed, and should plead extreme poverty, we are willing to give him is. 3d.—but, mind, not a farthing more! We have inserted on the score of fair play, and, accord ing to our general. rule, a letter which will be found in the prop!. place, controverting the accuracy of the data upon which are founded Mr. Sadler's calculations as to the duration of human life under the factory system. OL STANDARD. We have no disposition to screen Mr. Sadler from any well-founded charges of error that may be brought against him ; and upon the same impartial rule we are not the advocates of excessive labour on the part of mere infants in the factories. BUt we think that our correspondent labours under a mistake when he considers Mr. Sadler's calculations as being based upon a fallacy. It is true that he does not compare the labouring classes in one town with the same classes in another, and this merely because it is impossible. He, however, shows enough, and his facts cannot be questioned to convince the most fastidious, that far more young persons under fifteen, twenty, and thirty years of age die in the towns where the factory system is most prevalent than where it is un known; in London, for instance, where the people live in a dense mass, and in a smoky and otherwise unhealthy atmosphere. This, we take it, is prima facie evidence that some thing is wrong in those places where the most early mor tality prevails ; and it is not an unreasonable inference to assert, that the factory system is less or more' connect ed with the unfortunate cause. If there be more juvenile mortality in these towns, such as Manchester, Leeds, Bolton, and in many of the towns and villages of York shire and Derbyshire, than in the towns and villages of Middlesex (including London), Devon, Essex, and Lin coln, which is not denied, we should like to know how the excess in the former places is to be accounted for. However, as commissioners have been appointed for the purpose of retrying the case, and investigating the evidence already adduced, it would be unreasonable to prejudice their observations, or impute improper motives to those with whom, and for whose sake the commission originated. We shall not, therefore, unless reluctantly compelled, take any part on either side, till we see the result of the present proceedings. As the Church patronage of our Corporation has been the subject of recent remark in consequence of the un warrantable attack of Mr. EWART and his petitioners in the House of Commons, we have made some enquiries into the matter, and communicate the following results, which we believe to be accurate.—The accusation was, that the Council preferred few, if any, but their own relations ; the truth is that of the seventeen clergymen appointed by the Council, only seven are related; the remaining ten have no relationship whatever. Of the seven relations, the Senior Rector had, we be lieve, at the time of his appointment, one brother-in-law, the late Town Clerk; and it is well known that his con nection had nothing to do with his appointment. The Junior Rector had by marriage four connections ; but of these four, three voted against him, and only one (Sir Thomas Brancker) voted for him. He was appointed in preference to the son of an Alderman, against the wish of a powerful party, and in the very teeth of that family influence which is said corruptly to bias the electors. Of the two relations most recently appointed we believe it may be said with truth that they are two of the most ex emplary and hard-working clergymen in the town. So much for facts against assertions. We are not taking up the cudgels for the Corporation in this instance; we are only anxious to publish the truth, and we shall be the last in the world to speak lightly of Church patronage. We regard it, and we hope the Corporation regard it so too, as the most solemn trust which can be confided to man. If they value their character, their safety, and,, we may add, if they value their religious salvation, they never will, through fear, favour, or interest, promote any man to the ministerial office. Public opinion will no longer endure such sacrilege ; public opinion will break forth into indignant outrage ; God's wrath will be kindled against them if they do. " The worthless nominations of a corrupt and unprin cipled patronage," says Chalmers, " would now be felt as a moral violence, and resented as such by the general voice." As they wish to have an orderly loyal population they will confide its religious instruction to men of talent and character ; they will not appoint men because they are connections or boon companions, but because they are good preachers, and have given proof that they will em ploy their vvhole time in promoting the religious education of the people committed to their care. " Such, after all," says Chalmers again, "is the native preference of the people for an establishment that nothing but a right and conscientious patronage is required to keep the bulk of our families within its pale." Let the Patrons look to this and we shall want no other sort of Church reform. LORD ALTHORP, after several disappointments, has at length been delivered of his bill for the commutation of tithes : and, as far as we can understand it, we think it may be serviceable to the interests of the community in general, and the church in particular; though we fear its machinery will be found very defective. Mr. Baring has already pointed out some very striking difficulties with respect to garden and hop cultivation, and in many cases, where from indolence or timidity the incumbent has been contented with a very low rate of tithe, the system of average will of course compromise the interests of the church. This however cannot be helped : individual sa crifices may be submitted to for the good of the whole, and the commutation will remove the real substantial ob j ection against tithes as a tax upon produce and an impedi ment to the employment of capital in the improvement of land. Not that we think this objection of much force, be cause the ability to pay increases with the increased pro duce in a much higher proportion than the tithe. For instance, if a man occupies ten acres of land which yields one quarter of wheat per acre, at 40s. the quarter, he gets £lB for his wheat and would pay £2 for the strict tithe. If he spent £lOO in improvement and got three quarters an acre instead of one, the strict tithe would be £6 it is true, but then the tenant's share would be £54, that is £36 per cent, inclusive of straw. The objection against tithes therefore as a bar to improvement is not tenable. But still it was felt as one, and therefore we are glad there is to be a commutation of tithes. Never theless we fear it will give little or no satisfaction. It is not commutation of tithes that is wanted, but extinction. The farmer wants to keep the money in his own pocket; the landlord wants to get it into his; and the, told that they shall get cheap bread. Vain and delusion ! The poor man's quartern loaf will same, the spoliation of the church will not • penny a year. We repeat, however, that Lord bill will give little or no satisfaction. The e ditor Times admits that it is good, pro tanto, and much more in the way of church reform will be respectable and long-sighted men" ! We do nt That distinguished individual's " respectable sighted men are like Roman Julius or Swedish Peace courts their hand, but spreads her charms in, " Think nothing gained," they cry, " till nought What care they for the church ? What's Hecub a What will they gain by the commutation of • reform of the establishment ? All this, like the i Haman, will avail them nothing so long as i an archbishop sitting at the ki ng 's gate an d the staff of power. The editor therefore an authorative air of pulling down archbis! relegatingbishops to obscure municipalities is income : and when this is done, some bol' himself perhaps, in bolder mood, will say, at all? While we are upon the subject of clerical must beg leave to elucidate a point which we Althorp has ignorantly exaggerated. Ad' enormous falsehoods of former statements church, he states, upon the authority of the revenues commissioner's returns, that the of the church instead of being £9,000,000, teed £3,500,000, and that the average to k would not exceed £3OO a year. But there 1 5 acious over statement in this. The nominal be £3ooa year, but the clergy in their returns ted from making any deduction for arrears, not expected to be received! All rates, tax , in respect of mortgage, repairs, &c. were also in short the return was of the gross not of the The bona-fide average of available income verily believe would hardly exceed two-thirds age stated in the returns. In order to illustra the following statements from the British The Rev. A. Percival returns the net income of East Horseley (taking no account of repairs of first-fruits, and tenths) at His poor rate is 55 0 0 Highway ditto Land tax 22 0 0 Glebe-house, and window tax 10 10 6 97 10 6 Leaving him the enormous sum of £122 9s. 6d. f' of his family and the claims of parochial charity, Dr. Rudge, of Hawkchurch, returns his living His outgoings as follows :—Ordinary repairs '25 0 Chancel Land tax Poor rates Highway 2O 0 Tenths Archdeacon's fees Expenses of receiving tithe 20 0 Clears .........••' He adds that he has spent from £6OO to house : if to this we add the enormous di the bishopricks in the repair of their et dences, and the demands upon the purses of tb charity, we should like to know what would the average £3OO a year? Besides, we real' may venture to ask in this free-trade co• merchants and bankers make their 20 their £12,000, and doctors their £6,000 a y clergy are to be stinted to an average of clergy do not require, and ought not to covet in a money-getting country like this, povei generate respect : and we think that even'the abolition of pluralities will not mend the matt the livings are to be held by men with any tl equality of £3OO a year. LONDON LATEST NEWS• Saturday Evening, Half :past Se By late accounts from Algiers it would appear that tl in a very deplorable state. The inhabitants were st many evils, among others, that of a contribution Duke de Rovigo ere his departure, for the purpose depot of grain. Many of the people were utterly unal and those who were able fearing it would only be further demands, in violation of the terms of the cal preparing to leave the town. To prevent this, an in' leaving, either by land or water, had been put forth, un was obtained from the functionary appointed. All th' neighbourhood; in order to secure their property, were little Atlas, and establishing themselves on the other s: of mountains. The plain of Mitidja was completely execution of the two Scheiks who had come to Algiers conduct had caused great suspicion among the natives. The people of Mascara and of Ternesen had decided ( submission to the Bey of Constantine, and two Depute had been favourably received. The Chief , had accept Government, and altogether from the tenor of these clear the situation of the French is by no means envir By advices from Corfu, we learn that the Ottoman lished a Deereein the Greek Provinces still belonging hibiting, under severe penalties, the departure of any families. The heads of the families were permitted 0 to transact their business, first obtaining permission of We learn by late accounts from Mexico that General about to retire into private life. -M.. Valentine Gome's finitively appointed Minister of Finance. The electi' trict of Mexico had terminated in favour of the modern We have advices from Manilla which mention that been issued by the Governor General of the Philipini the deliberations of the Committee on the proposed IF the two Boards of Health, and as to the sanatory dut on shipping 'entering the ports of the islands—tile follows : For Foreign vessels under 200 tons, 3 Dollars. From 201 to 300 tons, 5 do. From 301 to 500 tons, 7 do. From 501 tons and upwards 9 do. Vessels put into quarantine pay double the above vessels in all cases pay one-third less than those u nder,. flag. Bills of health are one dollar each—for Spani'' half. Our Consol Market was exceedingly heavy until ye reaction took place in consequence of a report, foi dredth time, that the aflair between Belgium and course of adjustment. The price for the Accounts which it closed this afternoon. India Bonds closed Exchequer Bills at 49 to 50. East India Stock is abr better to-day, the price being 223 to 224. We have able degree of buoyancy in Bank Stock this moral.' One time was as high as 199, but it closed at 1961 to little to notice in our Foreign Market. Nothing deciso ceived from Portugal, and the Scrip is heavy at 6 to The Bonds are 50 to 51. Spanish Stock has been he' left off this afternoon at 191. Dutch Stock is 4:3i , Russian 1021 3 ; and Danish 72f 73. TO CORRESPONDENTS. "Mercator's" letter is unavoidably postponed u 0 , publication. e thank our poetical friend for "The Cast and which we are unable to insert; this we should se' if our facetious Chancellor of the Exchequer lit a Budget full of, almost, never ending mirth to connected with the cotton trade. We have a of other letters lying before us, some of whic h for insertion, others unsuited to our columns, that we intend to use at a convenient season. LIVERPOOL ; —Printed on Tuesdays and Fridays, in John Street, and Published at No. 7, High-street , SAMUEL FRANCEYS, Stationer, of No. 7, Anson-stre! Advertisements are also received by Messrs. Joillt' Dublin; _and in London b Messrs. NEvrtoN, N Fl square, ewgate-street ; a nd Mr. BAIIKER, 33, ? and the poi * Vain and 0 taf will remaill, ill not save o._ ' ta t Lord Alth . crl . • The editor 0f;11.2 to, and saYs d will be exPe ct ',_,. Ye do no t dou; s. Jectabie and I i Swedish Chal charms ineva_inii? . nought r rilao 's H ec uba t° tn , ion of tithesnr ,;; s , like the enr , long a s th i el l . a nd ''°` gate ,„ i•I . refore taw i i ehbishoP rick I lities with a i, v l e bolder l tdl say, wilY Pal t 0 vie s lerical ille ° .ti ii• t tlll,ll , Advert r), !n ts resPrl'd, f the es9:l rll the whol e c l te , ,000, M!" 1 ‘ e to ea ch y here is a ninal o er3 Y , - - , t urn s sver e l 4, t ifr ears , e° Pa, / ;, taxes, P c/ v re also es. o f the n e,;l 'i :tome there!. a l- o s.s i tt l i h n h . r s a e i lir o tdl o e f sa f t e gi°l :: ifa. ;i ' , ' , £220 ) . . ) ' . ~ --- . , 6d. for til l , rarity, :1 lying at' „' ;25 0 N -... 13 10 , 11 , ' 4 % 16 19 ` l l 51 13 20 0 3 11 U ° 16 20 0 0 t' 1 51 / ___..-- 1 11 , Al ... .: 00 ,411, 1 0 to il .I',lt a il ius dedu ct j o i tot ir epis ccr iVie' te cl ' ,( 1 es of the i ,l h , h ect !lir, would - .., It; -, f ly ~,l'(,, ye really' f 'ate countrY' li t . ti;: i t ; i ' 20,0 0, if te c , i!, )0 a yea r' ; 4 " .e of X 3 v v ii i i p c o o v v e e r dl t :;: jal i e il ven•the 1°,04 . ( to m atter Kt! 1 any thin 11,4"8,-.! 1 ~ , 4 : : , 11• doe 4 1 ' rEvvs• • 11;: 1 past Serer P-41 r that that 4 l . l ~4 s 'ere struP. `tli t lion toe*/ P ,a r , purpose ° to , 4 4 ly unable , aq, illy b e tliV ici._ 4 the caplo'fiel i s: '' an intesti. orth, tinl;7o,;,_ All the iti 7)-p, ty, wer.° re A other side e v [fletely de'..,,0 1 , of t ~ o a _. i)a t t A c i hci s ee ' l epe c: sdu s p i e e . toit r eric ' adie : eic ge o 4 . , . t 11 ,,. 4 eer ,: : : , 1, ; enviable. toman 1 3, ,1r„ el t ionging of ' ',l' o f any ' 9 , 0 ii 1 . .4, itted to ', s o t !, i sion of %L o p , 1,„,, , . ; 6 n otn erf , - 1 ,„, , 1 0r 1 e ` ( ,,,. I ctionsl. 4 ., ( "deride 1 , 4 4 ' 42 '4 ion ° that 3; 5 04! 'hilipipecrio e 4 oseit in to ry duties 'e g 8, s—the .r3t ki I e illl Y • •:• :( 'ty O. Of Lbove ra . t, Iv se under . r Spanish, ' 4 1 ) n r t t i , l Ler t ' , , t , i h , and go, t o r ', th !o c i l i o n s ts ed i t i l ;6:4 is about,ioll, r` i l , have ha Tie ,ornil„,,, ~, ~ Mt to re ,`i i .,4l' d a reto 11 ,,t ! ',' 1 . 11 t:, een hea'Ati.4 1:. , ,:, is 45i. I Jr, I iNITS. oi I ,' if ; 1 til la l '' Dned to 1 ~1 . ~ be' ,'t, last aoL! t g! - 've )alt • so , T ) , i ot ,t l " , . 4th ha h ' - ', ge l ; ',. , i 'lt ( - 1-th to t`,: r d.,;(tii,',ik ,ifia,,v.hei:hraiiri je j, I.tt. oluraus; il , 1 L m............. 3 1 s, in 0 11,t'el,','? ? 1 , -street , 4 . L i '4 stree.. 4 ,0, ~,., 0n . ,... 0055 . r 0. # i l,l cC r,'Nj, Flee tC' 't' 33, 11 4:4 1 . qt, , e .-. 11 ' I l) t , I r ' 51 1t .4 , ' u, G ' (141 47' f . C . ll ' II