The Sun. — London, England, 1817-05-26 00:00:00

TO THE EDITOR OF Tan SUN. EDITOR,—The Morning Chronicle of this that 'l l ziit Emit: No N AGO'. had been t,►- Depr lord to► inspect the Royal Yacht, AND IS4t/ VD 1114 011DREIS lor its being ready to sail in 24 holm,' notice for Brighton." , . l'hk• of Sending Ships belonging in the conntr) to SCA has been invatiably placed in the hands of the Lord. of the Admiralty (and where can it he licher ?) kind still remains so ) and 1 bhuuid viAl t he I'dper in tittestion in state why thi s p 10 the tloty of that Board is taken away7i N'Ve ate certainly reached a nen, era fur Ern idle. ration to tAke place. Pr‘iiy pot the public correct on this point, as yo u r ctilitmoS are looked to for accurate intim mation. Q. IN THE LOANER. Grertm'ch Hospi►al. May 88, 1817. CilEslllllE. TO THE EDITOR OF THE SUN: Stts,--"Fam yon have been misianrrnetl respecting Sir J U EnKwroN'A being at the Mose of Coutttions nn Friday se'nnight.—i believe in diFposition prevented ition attending, and there fore he paired off theft day on !the CAttioLic ,QuEsTIoN with Lord CHARL.P.S FITZRUY.r-r•lt is Obviutteli the piragraph in the Cheshire dronicle wits inserted With ft view to prejudice Sir J. G. FA; eIITO NT in the opinion of his Constituents, but lie stands too 'high in their estimation, and his at tachment to the Constitution of the Country in - Church and Suite is too well known for so insi &outs all lOWA to produce any impression of that n.iture. . The Cheshire Editor should know that it is e common practice for Members of Parliamedt to pair off without attending the Elotme. • • I um, youes A CHEstltitE Flt EEtIOLDEK, and a *aim Friend to the rito'rlisTA.NT ASCENDANCY. Friday Night, Pmcia. Cotke-hoase. I'.ltlSONLlitS. Since the prisoners were arraigned, the elder Watson, on behalf of himself and the other de fendants,. addressed the following Letter to Lord Sinmotrrit 's Tower, May in. 1817. " My Loan-,1 am. desirous to inform your Lordship, that 1 shall have occasion to whi:arta several witnesses- to be in readiness to be called upon as evidences on .my trial ; but not having the pecuniary means to delta) , the expeuces con seroctit opon.theiratLendatKet and of bkirging up three or four a considerable distance front London, I beseech your Lordship will lay the same before the'llonOurable the Privy Council, that- they may take the same into their considera tion, and gri:ciously he pleased to afford me such relict a 5 is consonant with the -true- spirit of jus tice, and- the- liberality of the British Govern ment :. I beg your Lordship will also lay before . the Honourable the Privy Council my ttptal inability to de ray the expense attending retaining Coun sel. sod pitying my'SolicitOr's charges; that they may also take this graciously Into their. cionside. rafion for tie same purpose." but would your Lovdship will ettodeacend to Inform the. Ho nourable the Privy ,Council, J do not intend to place myself in the extremity -of.pleading in for. I na pappdfis, stud hope they will not wish to re duce me to that condition. 1 beg leave further to treipaSs upon your Lordship, to inform your Lottlship, that my fellow prisoners expressed their desire try nie in Court, on Saturday,- that I would ask of the Horiourahle the l's ivy Council that we may, for our own preservation, be per !tined to hold an occasional ,confidential commis nication, now that we have been artaigned, laud evidence collected against user-.the propriety of this privilege I fear will not meet the concurrence ~ of the Honourable the Privy Council, hot bay. lag passed my word to make the request, I must leave it for the Honoorrable the Privy:Council to determine; under the impression that all the io.; thdgelice will he granted that the stature of our cause will admit.—" I am, Esc, " JAMES WATSON." The next day Mr. J H. ADDINGTON sent a let ter to the Deputy Lieutenant of the Tower, di, reeting him to acquaint Mr. Watson, that. Lord: SIDNIOUTn had comthunicated his request to the Privy Council, who were of opinion, " that they would not he justified in advising a grant of pe cuniary:assistance, to,persons charged with crimes against the State, to enable them to provide for their defence, except recommending that they should be furni,hed with subpcenas for their wit, hessys; and that, as to-the wish expressed by J. Watson, on his own behalf, and that or his l e i:. low prisoners, to have private confidential com munication with eackother, it could not be com plied with. The Counsel who are at present nominated to defend some of the prisoners, arc Mr. WETLIER , ALL and Mr. Seljeant CoPLaY. . REV. DR. CHALMERS. Yesterday the public hall another opportunity of hearing this eminent Divine previom to his leaving town for tildsgow. He preached in the 'f o r e noon for the Hibernian Society; in the Rev. Mr. Manuel's Church, London ' Wall, and in • the 'afternoon in Swallow street. In.the forenoon be advocated the cause of the Society with his usual bitt his sermon in the ofternoon, on 'the d ege ntr o ey ottuan, l 7 was one of the finest speci mens of eloquence that could possibly be delivered from the pulpit, end displayed the most prolood knowledge of the human mind. The progress of vitt:, its fascinating allurements, and its tendency to the eternal ruin ofits votaries, Were depicted in the most glowing colours. The discourseWati concluded by art ,animated and powerftd address to the vicious on the folly and absurdity of their cominet. The pressure sit both places of wurship wits itlitiMITSC; Hod tti.,ogh ovary rateOlftturniMign, Wits made many thoimml9 went away very punch disappointed, for want of room to stand &en tit the doors. Mi.. WlLtlrtiVOß(jit, it'tt'StVi2roi Mertl!* hers of Parliament, were liietient in the afternoon. We muletioand -that the'Colleetion made after the sermon fur the Scot t wit ichhe prea.6lt .ed'in Surrey' Chapel on Thursday, exceeded 2601. which was very great, considering that every day doting the last three weeks collections had been made in the metropolis. LAW otnirr OF iiNG'S Ninv 24. z,rn.cLs uAr !mins ELLENBOROUGLI .INIS C.48:11.1;;RE.4011. THE K 1 \G G. itli"r. Tios nicirning the above defendant:Was hi-ought to trial for the Libel on Lord Ellenborough, colt tained in that placard which has been so cow.pi cootisly posted tlirottgitoot the metropolis.— The Atroxi4EY-GeNEam., in stating the short facts of the case to the Jory, con‘niented on. the peculiar Atrocity that marked a libel of this kind, which WAS eVicitintly levelled at the foonda• tion of the Justice of the county; bV.CAdse it must necessarily bring into hatred and contempt that saCred function Width the Nobly Lord, so basely libelled, had for Aunty years filled to the admi ration of all his triotempuraries, and the venera tion of everyhonest man. After paying to the Noble Lord the meeil of Wise so justly due to him, he extlerf•tbe witnesses to prove the case. He first proved the conviction of the defendant and others for the Stock Exchange Conspiracy, and then called a bill-sticker named David Tulip, who proved that he posted. copies of the placard in question in several places.about lown by the di rection 9f the defendant. After the case, on the part of the prosecution, Was gone through, the defendant entered on his defence. -He then began calling his witnesses, more than sixty of whom bad been subpoanaed.— Amongst them were Lord Holland, Lord Tor-- rington, Mr. Vansittart, Sir F. Burdett, Mr. Bvn nett,, M.V. Mr. Mellish, M.P. Mr. Manning,.M.l'.• the Lord Mayor, &c. &c. Mr. Butt proceeded. to examine them at considerable length, to spew that he bail endeavoured, but in vain, to bring this subject befor'e-Parliament. He also examined several witnesses from the house of Gosling and Co. Bankers, and endeavoured to establish that the MOM bank note, paid by him for his fine, was poi(' by Mr. Barlow into Orating's house on Lord Ellenborongh's private account. It however ap peared clearly, that it scat paid to,the account of Mr. Lushington, Master of the Crown Office, and by him paid into-the Exchequer in due course. The gelentlagt having closed his case, tbe kr tOßNE`i-GENERAL ,replied. Mr. justice AnaoTT summed up, • and the Jury, without hesitation, found the defendant guilty. THIVKING U IL G. Burr.. • -. This was theseeond intortuation against, the same defendant, charging him with printing and publishing a certain libel upon Lords Elleitbo. rough and, Castlereagh. The libel. Vi contitiried in a large posting,bill, which was headed " Pil lory ! Pillory! Lord Castlereagh and Mr. Butt," and imputed to Lord Castlereagh the having as rerted a gross and deliberate falsehood in his place in the,llouse of Commons, in stating that Mr. Butt had petitioned the Prince Regent for mercy, and for a remission of that part - of the sentence Which !related to the pillory, whereas he (Mr. Butt) bad petitioned the Prince Regent for a re mission of his sentence 41tnether,on the grounds that he had heen unjustly convicted by Lord El leftborough, for the purpose of malting money of ; - The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated the case, an called the person wird posted the bills in question, who stated, that lie received them from Mr. Butt, .and byi his direction put them up in the most public parts of Westminster. Mr. Butt addressed the Jury in his own de fence, and repeated that it was with regret he had .brought himself to make • these publica finite. it was not till every other mode of re dress hail been denied him that he fled- done it. H e . rea d a copy of the petition which he had presented to the Prince Itegeut,. which was for a remission of the sentence alsogetism He did not desire a remission of the sewence of pillory alone - , as. would .appear front , a letter written by him to the Hon. Mr. Bennett, in-which he states, that• preparatory to that evens taking place, he had ordered a gown and wig, as nearly resembling Lord Ellenhorough's as possible, to be made for hint to wear on the occasion, lie felt more hurt at the assertion made by Lord Castlereagh, as stated in the Times newspaper of the I 2tli of July, 1814, than et all the usher circumstances and hardships attending his prosecution. had endeavoured to obtain redress' by petition, but could not,. and was ultimately obliged to adopt the course he had done to bring the point to issue.— lie should now throw himself on the July, as mess of honour, as husbands, and asfathers ; and what ever their verdict might be, th ey would sati s fy him, and he ,should bear the punishment which might follow with patience. He then proceeded to. call : • Mr. Bennett, .who stated, that Ise had received several letters from the defendant, but bad de clined bringing any charges forward, unless he could, be well assured they were well towies! ; be " did not 'kink the .statement given in a Morning Paper of what had been said. by Lord Castlereagh Avail correct. . Lord Sidmouth :arid Lord Cochrane were then calledoteither,of whom answered. Mr. But t said be would certainly bring an ac. ion against Lord,Sidsuouth. The ATT9I44ICY-ChNE444.. shortly replied, and . the Leurned Judge haviug sumuutiptd., the Jury after a short deliberatiaotouud defeudttut Guilty, CRIM. COURT OF COMMON, I►LEAS, MAY U. GEN. GRIFFITHS V. BRO%VN, ESQ. Mr. BOLLAND opened this case, and stated, that it was an action for criminal conversation, In which Charles Griffiths, E'sq: was plaintiff, and Nicholas Brown, itq, tear defendant. The di,. mager were laid at 50001. and the defendant hid pleaded Not Guilty. Mr.Serjeallt BEST addressed the Court antlJdry as f o ll o w s :--- " , Aly Lords and Gentleman, we commence orir proceedings thisAlay with an action arising nut of adultery : a melancholy circumstance, when We 'elect how much the prosperity of a Statt de.. peuds upon the morals of its people. Mr. Grit*: Gendemari of high sunk, a General in the Army, and married the Lady, whose conduct forms the subject of our inquiry, in 171)6;—she was the daughter of a Baronet, and possessed all Ease attractions 'calculated to fix th ffictions of au lionotirhble At tlij,it Mr. Griffiths had arrived (Ay et the rank of Captain, but hi the course of Orores sit:flint career, he reached the rink Which he At piesent hold,. In the course viee's he was called to Gibraltar ; thither he t`ettis aecolivanicd by his lady, with whoni he iiVed on termsrif the greatest cordiality and affection.." After remaining there some tine, Mrs, became so ritoch indkposed from the effect of tht cliwate, that it was necessary the retort's to England for the recovery of her health; and ac cordingly early in the year 1815, she ernba . ,ked for her native shore It now becnnies necessary that should ,tats to you who the defendant is. This I shell do in a very few words. MK Brown was, and I believe still is, a Captain in the Id th regi• ment, in which General Griffiths hai also been an officer, and was likewise a man connected with considerable families in this country.. He was at Gibraltar at the same period with Gen. Griffiths and his lady, and was received , at their table in the most friendly Manner. Shortly after Mrs. G. left her husband for the benefit'ot her health, Mr. B. obtained leave of absence, and from what owed, there was no doubt that be left Gibraltar Or the express purpose of carrying on that mini :emus intercourse with the wife of his friend which had subsisted bettveert them previous to her depar ture. Mrs.Grifliths, on her arrival in England, pro•. ceeded to Illightoti to the house of the brother of her husband, who %vas a medical Matt ; and after re maining there for a skirt !idle, she went to South ampton, where she took a house. She had scarcely time to gvt Settled in her new habita tion When she was joined by Captnin Brown; Who immediately after her arrival became perfect mast erof the house, her husband knowing nothing of her having such an inmate. I shall prove by the different servants who lived with (qrs. Griffiths during the lime that Capt. Brown was her inmate, that his comforts and desires : ixere courted with every possible attention. P re vio us t o t he arrival of Captain Brown, Mrs. Griffiths slept in the sante bed with one of her children, for she had five at the time ; and here it may be necessary I should state, that I am not furnished with the menus oh proving an actual criminal ititercomie .between the parties. • This fact must be collected from cir cumstances, and I apprehend when I shall have detailed my evidence, that no doubt will exist in your rnin4S on the übiect..' 1 waa observing that when Mrs. Griffiths first went to Southampton, one of her children was ini the habit of slteping with her. After some time o 'however, it was dis- covered that the child cried in the night -not 3 very surprising thing, gentlemen, when the hap- less infant was deserted by that parent in wbose bosom it had•been•wont to.seek its repose; for it will appear, that it was not in her own bed Mrs. Griffiths indulged in the Criminal embraces of the defendant. in consequence 91 the crying, how ever, a crib was procured', to which the iutant was afterwards consigned ; and thus banished from the bed of its mother, it soon forgot the soothing's to which it had in a less guilty Season been ac customed, That the aduttc►v had not been com mitted in the roo►n in which the Child - lay , but in that of Mr. Brown•, will he interred iron) the ob. servations Wide i were made by the servants iit the house. I shull prove by these set yams that the of Mrs: Griffiths frequently exhibited the ap• peora nee of a person having only joy laid town in it fur a moment, while that of Cwt. Brown,•whith was in the room immediately adjoining, In use the servants' phrase, wns " notch tumbled, or n►uch kicked ►+bout," and evidently bore the marks of two persons hiring slept in it. this'view of tl►e eau it ealmot he ►loubted that Carlin Brown and. Mrs. Griffiihs were the persons, who slept in the bed. l'hings.contino , ..d in this state for some months, when General Griffiths suddenly returned...to lii,nglatul. Captain Brown was then residing with Mrs,. Griffiths at Southampton ; but the mumeot Mrs.. Griffiths was apprised of the arrival'ofher husband, he left her house.and.went to London. General Griffiths was told by sonic person of 'What •had taken place, and determined. immediately to het aft for London to call Captain Broth) to an account, and to obtain satisfaction for,the disgrace and luisety he had brikight upon his family. Mrs. Griffiths, however, apprebenSive of: what was abOut to take place, sent for a person, whom I shall call as witness,' and desire:l him to go by a particular coach, and carry a letter from her to Captain Brown, for which she gave him a ten pound note. ,this coach was to setoff for Lon-, don previous to-the mail, in which General Grif fiths had taken his 'dare; hut being full, and the messenger hying unAble to obtnio a, passage, Mrs. Griffiths desired lihn, to go up outside the which lie did, and arrived in London at the same time with the Geseral. lie contrived to read) the hotel where Captain 13rown was before the injured husband, and delivered to him the letter with which be was entrusted and thus most for tunately the meeting contentplated by the General was prevented. Calif'. Brown sent an answer back Southanspton by the same messenger, who deli • Vered it to Mrs Griffithi. Here is an additional proof of,, the interconrse which subsisted between the parties ; but I shail.carry nil! evidence Still further.' -Gen. Griffiths having resolved to hold no Mather' communication with his guilty wile, sent hisbrother down to SonthaMpton to make some arrangement for their separation. His Lady, however, lib• mantled, and a considerable time elapsed 'before she cowld be discovered. At length, by the us siduity,of the plaintiff's solicitor, she was traced to gseter,- and there in the Cause with Captain ' Brown, : whose regiment was quartered- in that place, she was found residing. It may be asked whether I shall be able here to prove the exist- enee of au actual oimimil intercourse—,myttoswPr will be. "No for at this time. Mrs. was su far advanted in her pregnancy as to tender it unfit that the - should be the vent tier alter pare ntour's heti. She Was short lyafte r deliver ed ofa of the illegitimacy of which there is no question, for I .shall prove t h at it could not he the eane"l'' heyr~url „11 rint)bt, front the fact of his havjuit bc" be fore the aild S6t horn; te rt a n s d i t t li ' a v t el ie ve a: lt 14 1 .s " C ti t s pt:T 1 Brownsi is a conclusion to which you, Gentlemen of the Jury; still fell iso difficulty in coining. YO, fiud them living together tinder the drcumstanoes which I hate described at Southampton; you find L 6 them afterwards living together at Exeter; and, ATI rtithohgli I cahoot fth.}o.:,-, %:ii l , tlacr tile smile root, i cilibl is laorn• if, tht same bed; I spihrit,:titi tiikt the ohiy lac . retice eein he itirit‘n front their COWItiCt il, pi Orc they :Aria torther th"t t h ey C lived In ril iesprcis itii flion.allo;4.4e, AM: alai the tilLtinflii I's fully cutitleci to PM' T . .1 diet. . - • The Statement of the !:earned Seileant ,Os completely made but by the witnesses. 10 ,11 )4 course of the evidence it appeared, that tlie.(e. neral was abbot iii years old, hint Wile sigiTli 4 - and Brown about 28'. Nis. Griffith! was n tlegtil;' by several witnesses to be an extravagattt roltitills,,,.: wom:in, wii‘ose expences were tar beyond hertiat..,:. band's Means : it also appeared, that wilco sh j e L %VHS in Eli:land St '.e rczeivc) trout the G enet '; eooi. A veer, being 30. W. more than the whole'o,'', his unattached pay. . far Mr. Strjeant VACduct vld J reasci; etcthe y ~.!, the defendant. Thi3 wa s not a case tvhiclt'heevl,:. damages could tot .h. There was no brtee the k.:01 ' Confidence or previous intimacy between O'': fendant and the husband : seed in a ddition ,,l t, iL . .:, client having no mor e than his pay to "Pr ii :' him, being now on foreign- serv i ce , any tion o lil . therefore, like immoderate d ama g es he could .-?. pay. , Mr. Justice DALLAS observe& -there *ere see circumstances in favour of the defendant. was no breach of confidence, and his beingl, much younger than the %roman, but still.he 0.0., bound to reflect on the enormity of his crime:, , Ile had made miserable an unhappy and delta! woman, and brought disgrace upon six chiltirtoloa, of which she was the mother. Under the i l e il i k bf the circumstances, if !hes , thoug ht the ":- 0 . ant guilty, it followed that he was twenty li t ! common degree i and if so, the Jury wo"' l : I , l f under all those considerations which arosr.°7l4,: all the facts and circumstances of the cafe , ', 1 1 0 , , , damages it would be fit and proper to give . ait h •... Jury instantly gave a verdict tor the pleintia , ; , . damages, One 7'housancl Pounds. --....m0•---- _ A.--. ~,1 6 $1. - SHERIFFS' COURT, BEDFORI)-ROW4m-3 ?ROUTER, ESQ. V. lITANDIsH, $ 14 %. o i . pt This was an action to recover cOmpeli's'slie....• criminal conversation with the plaiatirf °fo ie di The defendant having suffered .iiogtoci)i; e default, the present inquiry took pitic e, . ass "' '' ...°- ior Under Sheriff and a speci al Jury, to .. '. damages. - ' Ire Mr. SCAELETT addressed the Jury °P I al ik of . of the aintiff . . The plaintiff was a pill ,--,;(iii, considerable fortune in the county of .it ,;ll iti g and married his present wife, yr" :4-000-4 daughter of a Mr". Hill, also 11 gentle ,ICY IA 'i! , tone in the same county, in Is lo . ".ii, t (1 .10 . , no children, although Mrs. Proc ter i hitili','; after his marriage, proposed ' so tilok ail !'.. venal times miscarried . Mr. I'll3'oer, cortioill,' , conceiving that it would Con" th i o rv' the hair, , itess of his wife. It was'ilori,!4„,,,st . f. C"tiintl at Rome, that the aefewisioQe- ot A hatis 4 ql"lialed with Mrs. Procter. The " e ll g lOC '.' a Mall of considerable fortune, ''l k l i - cr Al f ! "lates in the county of Lancaster:- ~,fraOir4. Procter quitted Rome he recCivra_ftittebusl mem in itis wife's affections (or the .ll , 14 ',01.0 10 : ';' he had no suspicion of Mr., Stantil6Pl4rf;lif: not till . some time afterwards that lt,„f ~,''ro : 7 ; ~..', to believe - that she hall formed Aot i fr, °lll :ii nection with that Gentleman, at P : l oostfe -1 atn oad hc, had tvro servants with °trate I. '!;i rettiele ) the latteiof whom on irci,r l a tii . ll' fi land (pitted his- service, and weitt'i n lie r rev: 6tiof b e r fantilv—and it e r i ls n ot flo'l l '' fo lly il l ' . . from abroad a second tint , ', that he w it. ' , , , o 'lit fled of his dishonour. Ihi'l ° ; Vid o Dorothy Marque, the scrrnot e, ohm s ` l „ e r Mr. Scarlet t, was next called-.-Irro; "-ovitil ', J , 'hum in Jul}, lsl4 --tots R good ti,te4. W• fleas mistress, who miscarried once fibro'er o ne wi t o them tit liiiine, iitsr mistress lob' Itoipc34e. person would call whom she tvishe(o4 t ot 7 ~,, in her I i o r.livess'•,) beet.room..--lic ,t ocordift know it was Mr. Standish. ne Cl,OO , l e o ly, and witness s'lleWeil hint to he r , ttoilefi .., 1 4, hexas joined by her inistress. I t ..otie 90 .00 , olilWe. lie frequently afterwordg i t ; 0 :0 0 0 . maitre('-atone with her mistress -in° ro ,, dic ;: ) Several witnesses were called tg:0111.11,41 '' fectiuttate terms on %chief] the pliii 4 , oet i o o. „f his wife, up to the period of her gc' .. oe pil l ; to Mt. Gt./as:EY addressed the.Jary 700. oelito, die delemlitift. ';'he yv bole titteiroitfto:lo determine was, what damage illc tarn prel oi tnitied from the tfetentlata. Jt ira i s oi o darf _iv nor could it, that the defendant 1/4_ iovitoti,(7.ll,l IA" 1 Y ; be bad merely accent"' 'tit!lert sad: :ti,fe i l t:t i e ) a t e t t p t t r i pretended time. t . 1 1 :1 . ;i l l . : e t i l t u i t e a that I:ve,hl tgl:,":iiiiis:e:ll.:e: s o l 'i r : y l-' , ::: , : : ::. eg i ii l i r 1 6 :;::::r t ( 0 1 hospitality or of friead)bip• r a in, ,„Aed ' , ,iie[e against the d,Acttdant but the , o utoi 40 1 aCCCpting-an iiivitation tt„the,":„.4"ile-r otri°lo7ii! he wal reeri%eti by the Ja( j _...stalle .. et , appointment anti rCgtieSt ; tb!1(1 G I L" th'e OW ,ri or tile ttFit,l4o. fit deteildrlM'S CtlncitiCt ‘Vati eiltitlett t u 1 . citable consideration. The secotidary- then soment., ,cO,lOl-7 too o f lite ilc' g l t vs? the Jury, feltviog the cas e t . HI to , t om telli lll'ili:e:11::::1;11511-7:ItStijillf!!!!r5:-(41iigtr22::::i'17 -.------------ . 0 ,1 . - 4 fiLa:unudd):::oSateffiiCtinia,erle,irtt(iesiir'iii.ltiC:richait.rriru7l,:cabism.ll7ll:3lovolhillusle:3ll:,‘“ol:47::.: itiJnitli.c Ireth 1.6. 0. fir th Vr it'll oi cl° , /1 „:, °11.1'1;,,,4hky tact, Dtt NI. LaUrenteltrafsol2g" ......''''' t —----.-^-'-"----- ----- --'''''''''''-. try' J ' 10 t MAllitigp. ,litlYtift)SY.l't On Sattirday :Waning, by iipecial lier42l!rri,,ioto,, 44 bY the Right lion. and Ito., 14,44 . 17 % f ,totri' ~ 1 , PbelPs, go+ to Ann Catherine, Colcr7ber4h. ,oirl,, Ladrhip was giro) away by ViJeouot , ; if l°rtrardf 1 ,, Same day, at Mary ftbode Choi": th.,, 100. Dart. of chAtlitegtteo, it , Drrbysitit-e, ti -_„ Ito , ... : ,. ..o . 'idow of Pattici Crisidorit, Es+ sun oPl2' ... Cranford, Dart. -__.-..----- Dili! ) . li V., On tlaturial lavt, at ltarors, Stitrett,:mlu)--'°:'loi.., of the tato Sir nailing Lighton. of !, 'l7,,verOu yil iie lb ' lute Batt. 'fes Laity setio-Nis heautift., ti at.,,,13r 4 > of Nr . rtr lite in titatoster, was the dry free ' ter 4 •4 Cere ii he rev* TER ati r. ,d 111! LI . On the 1.2 d inst. at hie bootie in sPr:g..,,,rerli 1 . 1 otrilt:o-'''';l in his .7Sd year, Witham Lewis, 464. ' geitib4 ." . ad : PAof the got India Contitital, .....,-..-•.001 PABumbay. _..................a......... _.,.....-4.-----:* - . ; IP, t , ,',. . ------- 111A4}1 ri tiv LO,NVON: iiriotcd try 3 . . D. OAT'S a o p otlo '' lt Pic, ~i ursnond•struct. Querii.teittate;,,,_ " sciurps, a 'NU. I , Sialtti Nt' ir . : i ' rei tigefil Ott er, No. ng, Stravi; `chrek,cl;olo4ss. Letters. ll,tx. (postinto.o fault ro t., Frt ;I_ll,l 1/ 4. 1 1it P .! 4e 1.,,, - .i'''d . p; 4 4 it, ;,i0 , ;,..,.t4t, • 4