The Sun. — London, England, 1806-02-22 00:00:00

The.rin-y accpiittea the Prigoner of the conspiracy, Lunu tint: Guilty upon the other -comas. LAW REPOR:T. COURT OF KING', B _NCI!, FEB. 20. tRIDAY, FEB. 21: THE SIG, V. GRANGER AND ANOTHER. GARROW stated, that this was •a prosecution by indi&ment, instituted at the• instance of the Lord Mayor of the City-of-London, as Conservator of the River Thames: He need not explain to Gentlemen of the description of the Jury, that the River Thames was like the King's highway ; that nothing should be done to obstrudits navigation, and that any thing, so done was an indi&able of- , fence. The Defendants, Messrs. Benjamin and Samuel Granger, were very respedable men in their business, aid carried on very extensive' trade. They had a great number of lighters, and employed them, with a great number of men, to take mud, of which they used many 'thousand tons, for the purposes of the West India Docks ; and much of it Was deposi ted in the bed of the River, so as to occasion vast shoals ; the navigable part of the River becamentir rower than before, by from eight to ten feet, that is, the low water-Mark was so much -nearer to the centre of the River. This was an obstru&ion to the navi 'gation of the River, of which the-Public had a right to complain, and consequently the Lord Mayor; ti. 4 'Conservator of the River, had instituted this prose.' cution, for the-purpose of removing the nuisance ; upon which a very sensiole Treatise was coinposed,', in the shape of a Memorial, presented tb the Lord Mayor, and also addressed to:the City of London, in' which are represented the causes of complaint ; hew . they aile . to be removed ; the necessity of their re-' moval ; for that unless they are, in 'a few years - there will be a iotarobstrudion to thena%Vigation of the river. There was but one objed in view ni"this'prosecn-: tion, that of discharging 'faithfully the ditties - cast upon the Lord Mayor by his office of Conservator; and that was; to take care that 'no nuisance should be suffered to continue in the River.' if there' be any at present it must be" , remoyed; and' that was ill that vas asked on behalf this'presedution'r atitt since he had come into Court he. had been informed' of what he did not foresee,-and!thatwits, the extent of the plan for the retrieval of the eaMplaint. - Thei Defendants did:not dispute the propriety of this'indid.-• anent, but had undertaken to , ternove the cause of it ; for•which reasein it , Was:tigteeil thati a .Verdiel should -be recorded against' their), and -theirthey would_set about removing the - obstrkitai6if as they were able, Nik'llitit'-h&hoped would 'be effeded So - as to render the .navigation as commodious -as- it' `was before. if they do*. 6t, they wili'beiliereafter . liable to the judgment of the-:Court whenever. 'tlae' Prosecutors shOuld .pray: for: it: If the; Shi4d-. think they were called on unnecessafily . lor - judges the rtr,- they should 'hare air bpportt pity of spewing that by Affidavit in their 'behalf: - Hdvino - 'J R& this, there .was nothing remaining 'but - to rece7ktlie , vert_Wl - - • Mr..Serjeant BiST) • behalf of the Defend:fait; said, - it Was impossible 'for him•,to • oppese diament with success; and therefore he' had con` ed, to a verdi& against hi 4 Clients. Ai , aSLAbeir determination to use 'their best - efforts to reaiiiiie all the mud they could out of this%part -of - the RiVer, but manythousand.tons of it was riot , deposited-by? thein, and the 'retrial : al 'of oath(*) Which . Vrolikl' be . attended with an immense exponce=;'• however, 'Alt they coUld do : they -w0u1d...-. thillBr these circum• - stances he shoUld giveto ihe-COurt tind Jury bow no' MARINELLI V. THE EX.ECUTORS , OF SIR J. GALLINI This was an action against the Defendants foebusi _ to Sir -John tj:~ilini's villa. The Plaintiff WaS oonsuited ; atad.the only thing ha ve-Cam was, what arose on the exatninatiotept - the .• • nom which it appeared that the Plain tiff haft recommended biro as a bricklayer, and he allow to per cent. cut of the bill to the Plaintiff, whose duty it was to Check it e to Which he adeed; it ivai; usually so to pay the surveyor who overlooked them, and sernetifnes he had allowed 12 per cent.; 'hut he could always allow 10 per cent. and get a living profit. THE KING V. 3. BROWS. This was an inciiament against the Defendant for having obtaieed•from one W. J. Bradbury the sum of cool. by falsely pretending that he could obtain for him a cocket writer's place in the customs. The fads, .as - stated by Bradbury, were as follows': That he became acquainted with Brown in the year '1793, through an old servant' who had lived with him for many years ; and 'wishing to raise some money, Brown, who was an Attorney, looked into his - affairs to .see what securities he could give. He told him he, had a Rever . sionary Interest in the South Sea Stock, of 5001. and upwards, but he did notapprehend he could sell that. Brown assured him he could, and that such thwgs were done every day; but he adviied him not to lay the produce out in trade, which: was precarious, but rather buy some place in a public office, and told him, he . thought he coule pro Cure -him one for about' pool. which wont(' bring hirt1:2001: per - annum.—;_ He approved of this plan, and Brown agreed to use his interest to get him a place. At , ditferent -times: beforehe sold the Stock he advanced to Brown 501. fer tees to -Clerks .in the Offices, Si:C. - as he was told.• At length- heerbund a purchaser for' the ;Stock, and' introduced him to a Mr. Emden, who was to give aool. for it, • but Mr. 'Emden said he would not give more than 2801. Brown insisted that he did not be• have well e .and that he ought to' give 2901. 'evhich Emden•at lest gave. Out of this money he gave Brown 501. which he pretended to have paid for-ex peeceslieproeueing his place, and '6Ol. lei his bill of law charges. He was then informed, that the pike ci a, Cui:ketWriterevaS vacant; and he would cer- : tainlyehe ehortly afterwards Broken wrote •to hfrn,and told him be was aetually apPointede and desired him to come to his lodging; and bring 51 A. to complete• the purchase, which would finish the business; - He attended the appointment, but beluga tittle late; BrOwn at-. first swore it him, but shortly after cooling, be took him by the hand and-- titi el 'have --done your business.. You 'are ap pinted, and your saleey• will go on:from•this day. '- Under this idea liegave him the other epl. Finding, however, he was not put in possession of his place, he•wrote - tO'Brown,': who answered his-letters from tile country. - - He stated in it, very angrily, that he would not he bothered ; that • he had no reason to complain, espeeia;ly'as his salary was going - on; and added, thatithii letter, .Was enough to'vex a saint, and set angels tog,ethereby. theears. He, 'however, expressed his _regard Abr hi, welfare, and beheeel him to be contented for a short time, and • he LivotAd be happy in his new. place. Firiding •So'rnany delays intervene, he was induced to get a friend to accom pany him to ,see .if he really was appointed ; and upon an inspection of the Custom-house books, he found-that he had been 'duped. fle could never, :see Brown afterwards, until he was apprehended last June, near Dorking, in Surrey. • MesSrs. ALLEY and CURWOOD, for the Defendant, Would have rested , the defence on the groundthat no money had. been received, but that the advances were all in bank notes, •Which was not " money, goods, wares, 'or merchandise, — asset forth in the - • Lord EtLENEOROUGH asked if any case could be produced which had -so determined it ; for other— wise , he should held such bank notes to be money, within themeaning'of that Mt of Parliament. - Mr. ALLEY replied, 'there was no'detilrminat/on to that etrea,and admitted he:had do other deferfee, as hecould not deny the fads. The Jury therefee' found the Prisoner—Giiity.. • : • and nothing else—a little, liine.water , ;(thfat is, ova!er in which quick lime is recently slacked) and a few drops of sweet oil : a rag 'steeped in it, and _rubbed over the part afte&ed, would, with a few dresSings, completely cure a scald or burn : this he 'knew by the only means a man knows any thing, by exile= rience and he knew that nothing could be better for this purpoge, because expeditious in the cure, and :sure to accomplish it. S 6 much for the necessity :of expence for the cure of the scalded foot! As to the rest, all the illness of this Lady had been ptirely'ima zinary ; and had the husband known of all these medicines he would have put an end to all the nen.= Sense, by forbidding it: but the truth was, that these matters were kept from the litim,slecle of the husband, which aPpeared.by the ^ Lady's Lord Ett.Ext6Retron Said, there V• 7 2IS great weight in the observations of the Defendant's Cotinse;l, avid thonght the mane paid into: Court an -Tie - fin this case. Ht's Lordship dispro, , a of the 6,ncluet Lady' in some particulars whieb..were disclosed'. lie left it to the Jury; however, toay„ whether 291. or 201.-slibuld'b6' allowed to the Plaintiff: the Defend ant had admitted 201. to be due,,by'paying that sum into Court. round a Yerclia for 'the plaintiff- , -DaL , , triages . 91: - thus allowing, him 11f s Whole bill. VINCENT ;I-ANDERSON AND ANOTHER. Mr. GARROw stated thYs to-be a case ni "whigh the Plaintiff sued as par.•,:et: against the Defendants, who were West India ,inerehants,t *Gr.a- compensation in damages for the loss he had sustained in the disap . pointinent_of his hopes' in 'the employment they undertaken to . giye him In the-plantation of Tasso, in Afrred, to -superififend their property theie.;• he having been: engaged by them for:that pUrpose, after having had several interYieWs with one of :the.Defendan-tSsi and proved his fitness for the station, as well by his conversation • as -by a dissertation -hehad written•on the subjed.. He had been in Jainaicatnany : years as kupeilintenclant of a . plantation; of coffee, &v. His engagerbfent. way to-he.'for three years, to be provid-' edAVithi,all - necessariei boaid- and lodging, and : have a salary of between 100 and 2001. a-year but. • the Defetidants - ; without a catise, - Itad:iefuse:. - 1 to ae . c-eptiliis. services.. It appeared bit Alin evidence of, John clerkof the Defendants', that there , tuts yin engage ment between , ' tlei Plaintiff and' these Defendants, that . 11 - e.should.'otr.employed on ~this'plitfitation 'for thre6'..years, at.a kalary of :tout-a-year, to commence dii his 'landing there': hnt - the . morning. After "this. agreement-wavnaude . between the parties,- the Plain . tiff ,wrote:.to.' the Defendants', saying,' unless;Alni : v would give him 1 501. for each _of the.two- first years", and 2001. for the -ad year, be-begged to he off. About I twelve. o'clock the. same aayllainaff called at De fendants' warehouse for an answer, and desired the Nintiresir 'to' sperdt - to Mr.. --Anderivoin.',*Thewiihess dithsu; 351 r. Andason . ordefetli..ittless to 'tall tii Plaintiff,that,"as he had departed from his part of the cantitta . , , dre begged leaf e to haveddr.e 'With ThOvittie.ss : ;.otil - thetFaiiatitf this; 'Upon which time Plaintiff saidf then, if he will notlgiv'e :5111. for the first . 0./.:04-earit; and r2lel . !:_fotn - the 3d, DWiti take 001. The, Witt - less: stated' this , tc; AnclerStin,;twhp' - saiii,.. , . be w.ouldiaktieTtsithi:ng:: * fari: l ther :t0d.16; with rthellaintiff.” ;. .Lord"Etaw BOBVi1(411,--iie: has chosen 'to put an end to a - e'ontiad which, upon refitalon; thou ht beneficial tOihimself., • • • .Mr.. GRRROW bbSel - Ved, that Ulm • was a , bOok written- ;17-y[l the Plaintiff in possession of the :Drs-' fOndanti..; Lord ELLEGTiOitiOU Gil ,Observe' that not bring this adt ion -for-goods sol-41-bu; might bri -his at'ition ctf trpver fqt this.book , •44-44 0 0$4 1 1) - hdded there were b i o L oks left at his Jion,-4e, : p4Ae J?eiieved ! miniy ()then, wl - 10y; would belovpuch to-bring an a4t r i9l for, swiLbctolis.i they yrsrejept.,,and s ty2;use4 to?, I?e,',!4live-ed tl i zvre sh9ul4. 'an,aaion , of nori lsOWLl•. : b•=ii ,was 'hen de' were ts;!Airro-I,CiW l e t Y c rin r - , , : • • -ern' .met EjAtuxiF,'&4,Al,l,,,lvi)chEt.he Plaintiff N,VAi Jlot. -rico .)- . •- • • • E.l • • , ' - COU RT F ,Ci4O I .IAION I'LEAS, - IVibitt , ".l,4 l, BASTARD. '• 7#0 . 14)0'M attidttiliNotight . by Col. More, jof the • BedfOrdltlititiaitasecovertlatmges of the:Dek7clati t, - ihe • Msitfaititalallilitat;y Court= Martkil; -fora false arrf!st af-R1 itelpriSbni)fientc - - . , It-arYptffinkifidtiteividenceOhat the Plaintiff pfeo.- , fLt# i AteAtiptitiititgEttiqstnktieral Officers'ofthe re- , rAowards , hiin; Yin cO 7 , 1b ifatilliiet=t4)lbWhib IViktiAllassettrbled - to 11 to. YfigaiWtheo'UlftitgWt'hfikrtlib,Dtfehil,ant, Col. Bag tatil);: Was I'r :51-tli.4fit.E 3 'ln: the ?tititt:te; 44 he eOidenee 1 forah4clpr(94octitietf Cell! Mertialnitted4Serjeant ttilliltiv'e" 41 . ,at'Captal• Gak,ett, -.." one of - "th e . the•chargeFAialpieseht at" the citt)lftersrrof ee'tk:(rf l bfaer's'iitStledlVl 7ol . - More c wledge of , th:transitEtion, IsVill;tcetlieldfd4file-hlitre:been delivered in the eh& Ofqiittitrittftef"•(vhii:h was...penveii , by 'Capt. 'Pre-' liti,ithAtE , Thei4ders were"-not issued' until May. -In e6titetitiMite nio!tiie 'latter - "OiltrtdiCtion, the Ciiiirt dbriOdeloe4Wßiihee-tis oTti.ilif4f-prj r ttry 5 and und#l- MitriAaitAitifiat."CdtAA6reihail aeited • ittiproperlfifi l suffering him to go on witlihg thotigh l t fl3-tAktc(_;6l. itiif iclt?li~ere li3 sin findCol-i'iderea tefj StilietiAtilftqatiffrothatardiy.tititill‘ltstiday" follolVin ' yiatpilAirtialtliiii''fliAilivAAttnettil of Setjeant Wary ner-W,"-IV-iftitAbtitablekc;4:AtitlofteePlleßion; and that the titistaitb "Woiald:l4-fi'& -.13. :6'nfebirKia in Court flierproftientiblithad not said it was nolD Mile? Ifill'Atie '-iicont‘jtances was contended that Colonel More hat,' been cI6 i,YoltheY4-4gllll'l'preCkiediiiis' of the' Could, hOtiOiur'tifitl'b - eett Wounded, 7 411 d 'largeCjarnagei l onlidAl&afforc.l teparatibti: , -Mr. Serjeantd3E-sr,,, f6rtheDefendatit; arged that: Bastard and the'Officers of the Court 'Martial" had not,beeh.aaliatiA ,by PA.:More, ' but ftltre4sli i t l raaktitin iii the"i'idetice 'inducki them to: itAtitite perjury, to tVe ISeileant anit if they' erred ki:ittir.estinir-ColOnel'lVllVe,' it was an excess • •entitled • of juriEldtelioti; and not a case t a the Plain ' The Jury retired's4nd - on- then - rethrn ' i'et, trouble. : . • Lord. - EttEti-Boßmoitt - observed; -that , this-matter. being thus -satisfa6terily explained, there was :nothing , remaining but to record the. verdia. his Lordship! observed, however, that a prosecution of 'this was hightrimportant—obstruaion to the navizalikiti 2 . of the River Thames was a nuisance not to be3iinilo (lured, because the Commerce - of:thislConntry its;As injured by it, to an extent 'Which might be almost incalculable ; • however,. he:bad-no .doibt that - 6etry impediment to the public convenience would: be reg moved. , ..1-• , •• • ‘ . • A verdiaof Guilty was then:ehteredagainSt both) Defendants.. • , . • The names of all the. Special Jurymen returned by ' the Sheriff in this cauy: were Caliedever,' but: not . one of them answered to.his name.; it was . .propoied that a Common Jury panuel slionld be annexed ^to , the record, and the cause tried .bra,Cotnmori - Jary,; but-that was .found impOssibie, :witliont-thivcometit. , of the. Plaintiff. If one .§Recial-Jurynlapi-Jiadiap a peared, .tales. might have bee 4 prayed, :and,'tiletet-, Coninion Jurors .inight be - added to hirn,, ,ii, nut, without it, so th4t the ,cav4e 1:.'' . .#,. I L / fir. want r iff 4, Tory. , . f• ~ , .. RUTLAND V. lANGION, • ~,. ~. The-Plaintiff is au -Apothecar.y: , and Surgeon at' Maidenhead, in ,lierks: Ali Defndarit (lives five;- miles. -from that. place!' .11-nd:r thisi :2 . 61Zon, 11r, PARKE - stated to be for the atteiidande of-title Plait : tiff, and medicines found by hilt for tbeWienciattesi wife,: ' for a complaint in li en siornach;. aid talso for: curing her scalded foot , for which the charge. Was 251. Some lotions :1i ~, bgeq_cliajgePATfi.v,q,Jh,ilkivgs 17 a quart, and. soille . ,414t4i4;7 1 .t;41, 4 1;it1b Nyjc,l,,qpi te n dap cek,at ' fi i'e :Sin' iflgs k , itity l ;* ;Alibi? t,, ' 4t, Alm Ffiki tah ce 'Gf five mile• —tt6 , ,q. ::.-: . :!W r 4l) RtiOrti.:•. 1 The Defenddrit'sll.la4; - Beiva44, was t c_xaminp4 o l4,lAd 1 he proved that Lis I\•l4qe.ss-,alviayii in eurnigOping. but, 1‘; ;sl i ly ' she wa6 4.' . ie P.Vi 1431/c4qk 9.1.4 1 !4F4.1 I 'l' Ilelrfi6 . )4s . IiTC—S4-1„gcl: c/Itded. 52A 1- P. l l 1, 4 /1 , 4, 40. the Plaint a. .4.-Stii - 4 . ebii fooled over the, bill, aiiii s4ftpl.. tleat, sup-1 posingithe kuedicines!tO haife..bcen al, .41ixtered. , tlie, charges were ldwr tlranbe ever .chAtged : k i A siiilJiti gl a diaught.was,'a .. pricr paid ,an 'Mildred i years l ago, .. • .)I.r. Gi:i.xE.Ow „.,.ou.,thepart of the "Def,pdant, ; oh— s'erved, that the,Pefendape r licsvife, a capricious rAdy, had, ordered many things w;high d werp, ; ,npt-, necessary.. ° She had gone .to Brightyn withput ; 4l4, leave.of her husband, who led in.his. own defqnc-14, been obliged to cry down her credit, by. advegisingi that he would not pay any, clsbt,s she might contr44, There . was no end to,these,tbings i there...was as. Much reason for saying that the Defendant should pay 991. as, 291. for this business, the husband never having, been consulted on these .occasions, and a Man might be ruined. Ile bad-paid g.01.-.Mtp„ccturt,. Which, upon such evidence as .this, .was titfitti.!t4 7 . dent. As to the cure of the scalded foot, he would undertake to say that - it - couldbe - euied perfealy, as safely:and as' speedily,. for :one shilling 'ai;for . any : larger sum of Money. It .was not impropr that the Public shbtild know it,, the iemedy:for it was thisi • TI3E' KING V. ViKILDGN . : The Prisoner, rho !mu .iithildon, was incliaexl for conspiring with AndreHugue and Jean i ga4il,l - :retach prisoners of war, to effect. the - escape : of the •t,wo lot tgr fr'om Chesterfield - , when they were prisoners on their paroie. Lunt ELLENBOROUGII said, he had just ; received , a litter from. the:Prisoner, in which he prayed-that be, might have Counsel assigned to him. His Lordship, said,- he .believed he could -not..assign,any,den tletpan N.'ithin the Bar; after a short con*leration, My. Ce'ry.v.oox) was_- the.Defeoclaut. fitis on the part of the prosecution werethcii.proved ; by 1.- - 1144,1ac5, .one of the,French prisoners,.- The case being . 494ecl, CURWO 0 13,..„, for the pri soncrs, submined a legal obj(dion .to his ,Lorsilip:s' consideration : observed the three persons were , indicted tur„a copspiracy, o Whom one only was-a snlijea.of the 1(44. Ia him it,was a crime to the escape of FyeliCh . pliscnier ! i. It 'W4s,no legal fence in the olar - tvvcr, There being theyefore only, que who, could commit, the crime,it was as though he stood incli4ed fur a conspiracy alone. , :This, would: bt.s.a,contradiaion in terms,,and could not be sup- Ported ialaw. He hoped.he had 'stated the objection, intelligibly—he would nvt argue it. lii Lordship said, it , was.distinatly stated, and he thought it a powerful ohjedion, and asked the Coun sel for the Crown what answer they had to ,urge. Mr. JAavis observed, that there were other counts at the end of the indictment for aiding and asisting. only the escape. s The Learned Counsel then . sbort-, ly addressed the Jury upon -the 14-Is—when Lord EL.J..iIIB9ROI.TGH summing up, told tik . Jury, that "the Detvadant had no reason to complain of want-of lgll:assistaiici,:fOr every obje&ioo in point of law, eVery argument arising - out of the faCts, had been urgedinhis,bela - alf., His Lordship,-however, thought that there Was autf a iCient in the condu of the Trisonerfor the Airy to say, whether he did not aft Ni7iti a guilty mind. I , LONDON Printed by RICHARD HAAR'S, 0I No: 4,'MrtJeit.court, Pow-street ; anti 11 ,. .Artsfieti-til'•Villt,LlAs , A'ltl744iiiitri'VCknePi; i oll 2 kitith itfickton,stitr, At the SUN.CIFFIoE, NO. I le, Strand where -4eivertis_rments Orders' for the Pater, Letters for:tiNe&atOt,.ikchtVitilf=tlciidT; nrafizid a IigAfSFIER 'MOORE. kEZIMARY 21. BENNETT V. ATKINSON Mr..EsriNA+ssa opened this. ase, by stating, that it waS an anion for assault, rendered more than com monly-flagrant by' the circumstance of. the' Plaintiff, upon whom it was catnmitted, - beinga man.Upwardi of 6:: years of age, and the Defefidthit'a young, mail, In the strength and luStineSs of 'manhood. ' Mr. 'Serjeant .- BEST, in proceeding to the details, the Defendant , was is called " a dashing, young man - of fortune," and who endeavoured ta support that chara4er by horsewhipping almost every Mali he Plaintiff 'and he, both of '.:viyoin had country libtises soine sinort distance from. toWzi . „ were, from accrue:July seeing one another, in habits •of slight and', touriebus iiltirnacy. In gust last the Plaintiff' was PrOcf - c - Ang to to's n in his when thePtifend: , ..nt„ who was also oti the - same route, in a high tashionabth gig, unprii- Vokedly ad&essed hini, by telling !him, that he was " scoUndrel,'and a rascal, and ought to be hanged." 'This odd 'salutation produced a'reply; upon which the • Defendant drove his "g-ig'alon - s-4i ,- ..tc.. the chaise of Bennett,' and; 'with all the strtlinft he possessed, most violently beat him with a 11 , avl. whip; and, having exhausted his strength, npoit Some persen: coming up drove furiOnsly' oif, an 4 left the Plaintif to seek thatredr6s Which he tieisi sued fer throlth the Medium of a Court of Justice. • Two witnesses were called, • who stated, that,' oil ff* 9th of Atigust they heard two - persons - in a very• warm altercatrownear the five,mile stone on the Lea-bridge-road;' on going towards. them, saw Mr.`. - Atkinson, - theDefeardant,' violently beating the Plaintiff with a Whip. Upon one of them going the!Defendant drove off at a great rate. Mr. Bennett did not attempt to,strike his opponent, but merely to avoid his blows, by Which he was so much hurt .in the face, that one - of his cheeks bled from the effect of them: - • A Surgeon, who dresstd tire Plaintiti's face; \vas also ; and aNeterinary Surgeon, at stable. ti - 1;- .. Defend'ant -put up his liorse and gig, when lie arriVed and,v,-here he related t4at. he had " given old Bennett agboct beating.", Serjeaut far : tiVe Defendant, called no, wiyite;..,e-'3., hut ei)Tninentvd.upoin the - evidence dneec.l-"by the' Nk v 111 sire humour, — 5 to upon his learned. brcitliefs'.fraild.Welt;'.ouaceount of' the ag - o ofthe Plaintiff; 'fhe'fiiry.. therriFels 1/ t h 'elf; Eittenti66 ,- waV iroEte.d :t o the. (3 co ?, r e rri4ll re- . sl)(te7ting Yl;(itruiltiaallUsinn then sat-be.for.:theii - i, : tiii - ,0 - itliej - NY atrid Scc t at he \`2s' a hale;. - sfimig - nian- ; ' , kfici isi.lspeagli :to be t.i* 4 's , :e4rs of 6.9,-e- aria 41,-mueli of 'whose fief:, the TheliCed.teeeii , *(l in tile AI): co nt re N . v*i t TA4 .hot 0.t.- pfEeni s , l3e,f9i4-ttheletniis - -ii‘T; d e?feitt I,d cx-. al-, fo`yd - 6if' htsfrtitig; gi-c e:; by the: • trli:" for 4ri4Wlllif, le' ,JZa _ larn, itce , b el.;';'that some irrei: , tic-'le WriOlifitklil .V4•i.be:c . - ii:A pe34?Ally stood, c•glk-7, pa se teore. t y pr6h c ktric'eil tli‘o and A rit th use- ari unticervled'clfilnibi?. Lord Chief - Justice MANsrIELD said, that, it events, the DeftrffEtzTt"tarruipliCperly taken the law .into IWYAh 4 i irPla4; .-14 ;4' 11 `ti*PtirY:to det q aliue tOle t 4 qr' . .o,r.ll9the a A l lYt 4tp ` .I ? c tS T LIJ!94 -1 . ( 1144P.e: tiffehiftiA, It .atitt.i; the ! am vpi e :F.A.f.,rieqss#o.o4ey !019P4be il3l9llll!F4:44*rtlaPtiliglY-P•i.,3N9a144*-Ork atit ihe : l - )efeNa4titlya . 4.se t e r sitigclApta Af - ,t i t . a' lit.te consultatippil *he 11:9r3tirkWile44 verclia s :1 001, • •-• AMT . i 3 : esterday, '4trhiA hottEe in Pottitilit.Hpface,..bfe, C:oliutess otMii;isft - eia,,pf a SO.P.. •, • • . • I Lately, I gliitteVett; ot'Chailottc-tteat ,of A Paillt,hiet. :.! e Olt the 15th:of December,-at Malta, the t a 4y, D i s cogitiel! .of the ith t4iTt . ; „ . 440, ; • , • St 4 Goonge tlle 'AlbrtYrf'.l l llolMlibUrk* iCliristqplier Broome Esq-. -of Great rmonti .Sselfar,,datthter late - William . . esrcray t,,ll.4ridu'i3 o lLienteilatitriint 4 3 l6 omiii;Ofihti to: Miss- niece to, Laty acres. . • --- . . . ."' • •!. • r)DIED. • • On the sth iriSurrejr 7 Mr. John Dear, is his.69thlear.. • '• • • • .14n the 70r . inst. atSlckhaca,,in Surrey, Miss Al4y, Pevir -- 'Yesterday, at his hodse inihe Rdellihi, john Cator, inftfid77ili year of hie ale{:: *--. -; • „ . ' ' • ~v~ , kiil4.T. CM?: STOCKS • . , , . • YESTEI3.I)*N,: - Bank StOck, tes 2t5 • ictitkqtock, opi t ficrfc . Navy 5 per Ciint, - 1 India Bonds, 2e. ts. prem.. I (itt s,per 4 - 7 41 1 t. .I•E r .XClWq#C'ii)i7;;;ClF l2l4 ;iie. 4 ptr• Cent. 'B6 79 . ,r, 1. - . 3 per Ct.. REM: , 6 F 3 per ('lent. nererrer, f _ iper Ce4ti.Civn.. 1,..60t1-, .impetbli3 Bank L. Ann. t7s 11.16ths Ditto Ann. 9 4 Ditto Short Ann. •Cons. for zph FeFi.,bt 6o $ 1 . . , • . - - • ' . *.•kl e II A SAX 11Z LE1 , 10'1;1) - ,gS T A T-E, 41).-gi>4l:4-; ~..... • i • '.W()I(CEST,F.RSHIItiE,.,_ . •',.;:i, , '. , 1 -'. '- *- TO: BE - . S-( n. l) BY, At; ci: L04f . ,-, ::, : 4 . ,•• ' sy:Dili , ."lloßlS, ' - ~ • . s .. . .....,. .•.. . . - At-C4a.r41,0 1 3 Cofite-hoirst; ' Change-al ley, C4rithar 4, 1 1,, don, on ‘Vertnesday, ;tli March. ISo6, tinfE - ss-in24fttarbtv .offer is previously rnaileby,,priyate,ClnlT fkrtr f ^. A 7 i l / 444 5 ertigla4trknik,)bf't'purea:MA Ak i o - pgril ,i--• -' stitti - dr:FMts4ifir iii ' thi kcoi :1V 2 61 .- Nv ..cest,; , i witit , this thiw;bUilbEkldTebt f falit . 'N'Ati€ , :oit,'re i ktilir§ ,- ; 04-4 KitR. Ciard4i3N-1. 41 11- e e- htY it , ,.! aPi ..5.0 Iva., Paxit iiiii, C'S:(ter,triiii, ritirgertiu's.Sla44 intti S,)9ls,% ( ,t4iit 304. eit-f*r-'todivenieitc.ieill)i'i'xtergire - Parrnilit rte e,logetfitt' witt the Cottagesiirnt chief - 11:e its r I tr) ~ t b fdattialikilkiiil:4 l i anging ; alsp z9o.4‘fes (aw n:- or....o . l...,i;opirreig.r.cptlie. , ,-L'ofe,. NI eado'idaid P'stui - e'l,r1 1 1"„ yvii f 11 4 49r tir i " lillc°'l ificl'exe-litsiv4 right . leir'fil )slieep P;riiti , ti .3 • 4 , 'o' .-,cr - s, ~it.„ rtcu 'Aftrinarsty,;'ht it:Trio& :Ntiaatqr...,d:trihnl'?ille 0 1 2 P-i. 4fe 4,ugust to tilt ilth i sfliptt . hts,-813-4;viAly, deir,l4l/40 , tit.exA.• tilisivc..- Fishery in tlie,l‘i av,iglitif4! 1-,:erAys„);,k, oith4l.llyji.y..; able Ai ts anii •It @if: Rea -{ li ;Mt . - 'Lltin V 1-6 m i set ' ~;:liSliei.' property of ----=—;;;anti hiicteeretticarnti3t;p3to Cirt. the occupation oli the lazs,..lplinilarfsl;ll 4 4s4„, ... ~, pi, , !f.' clfi , • ' 13eclon-1 - 10use is sititiieckdiiiiii.lien 1 0; ille, A r,tr,f.43,wsn, , in the Rich Vale'iltPElvelitlitri;'`ific:tia4,..egibie);Wgitti6tir ` hood, With gcxxi rtlisLlplezisaiir . lttiad .4.,cirititlellillioiy ti!orri Te.wkesbury,, • - ;3,frorn. G ;13,..1,x5Ter, t, f .,!-, frchai , lsktotrik - 4fr,, 0 , froit'Persh4ref,:,t4, fromWorcestc.-ri,s,yff:);t !, A ffi ll , Alia to ROM , Bkre-ittairtt. • - ‘ ,:=;IL ., , , L-. •,, • • • —• : ' ' • w Platt icul arl Mly be fimi At th,s if el-l - Poie;. Woree4fct i Flea aufi i:hick (Ins, 4141)ihiii;Oli,•M"-Jvr#r",i'ol?ft-.1.),TY ai"gt ! ii.a.r "Fe \-,,li.,:shory - 'Or`livl , ::slrs: .81-.4. , ney an,, -4) tw) . .ps, Eve sham, ‘vho will s,MireftfillEst'sit ;!.;li C. irrptl% Frottsc, near ' Chipping4Ortivi visiir;`./43firsttypiltir kilh';'-' l 3Ath; Bush Tavern, litistol,; ;49 - 4;;:,. I'qrit-uilt- 4 )%1L44,- ‘49n#4Siur ; C:eorge, *ortharnprenii Red - L lb ii: EVO Wyc;01Ot!; Whit; fielseiarscbildge ; Cnstl,!,‘ 's3lt,iiifl j , c:fov+4l, Italic g ; 6.t ~, o a f raw hyfi., aild of : M r:;: 4.'tirhin's, ‘Varmirck-gre;t, Goltien. " s Ilan: , . , :-, : —,—.....,—.—.—. C. ' .r~ r .;.;