The Sun. — London, England, 1806-02-13 00:00:00

LAW REPORT. ,COURT OF KINC's BENCH, FEs. rr. MI',AMI.TS DIRECTED TO THE COURT OF REQ.IYESTS OF TEE CITY. OF LONDON. Sir VICARY GIBBS opposed the Rule obtained by Mr. Wir.soN, to slew cause "why a Mandamus should not issue,caliing upon the Court of Requests to hear and determine a suit instituted by RichaM Clarke, 1 4 ;sq. Chamberlain of the City of London, against Francis Bailey, a Stock-broker. Byklle 6th of Anne,, 6, it is enacted, that all pers6ns pro posing to be Brokers in the said City should be ad:. mitted by the Court of Mayorand,Aldermen, under restriOons for their honest and good , behaviour ; that, upon such admission, they Should pay to the Chamberlain of London, fOr the uses afterwards mentioned, the sum of 40s. and that they should yearly pay the same sum - On the 2gth of "September. The uses are explained to be, to reimburse a person of the name of Wm. Stewart in the sum of 9671. and afterwards the profiti to be enjoyed by the Mayor, Commonalty, and'Citizens of London.' If any per son should at as a Broker without complying with these requisitions of the Statute, a penalty of 251. was enacted, to be recovered by - salon of debt by the• Chamberlain. Sir V.• GIB tas took this . diStitic, tion on the wordsof the -Act : that although the first 40s. were to be paid to . the - . Chamberlain' on adtnissin, 'the . stibsequent 40s. were not direded tq be,paid t to him. co nomine, but for the Use.of the . . An this case, it was not the admission, but the subsequent fine, that was contended ,for ;, and • therefore the Chamberlain, could not maintain his Suit. As a security for ,the annual fine, there was a bond given to the Mayor and Commonalty ; and the true reason of substituting the name Of the Chatn berlaidto this attion was, because the answer to them would be, that the fine had merged .in the' bond, and that the penalty of the bond being above the sum of which the Court of liequests.could take cognizance, could not be exalted by that Court. • Messrs. Wit.soN• and BOLLAND said, that the, -Court of Requests was instituted as early. a. 9 .the time of Henry VIII.. and.that it had been recogniz ed once under Charles I. and twice under James.— Since that time its powers had been enlarged, and the City had paid very dearly fbr its privileges in the jurisdition in this Court.. The whole expence of the proceedings there, in a case of this kind, was - below is. ; whereas, in the Courts of Westminster, the sum sought would be wholly sacrificed in the costs. Upwards 0f.20d0 Brokers contributed to the fund raised under the Aft of Anne ; and the ,only point to be determined was, if a'persou in the si tuation of, a Stock-broker exclusively was subjc. to this Stat‘tte ? The application was made to assert the rights ofthe City of London, that the metropo, lis might enjoy the advantage" of that Court, under its own auspices, and the decision of their Lordships would thew, whether they were, or were not, to be deprived_ of this easy remedy for. the recovery of is mall debts: It was unnecessary to discuss the pre cise words of the A& to enforce this application : it was clear - that the Chamberlain, in the first instance of the fee of admission, was authorised to maintain the Writ, and by implication he had the same power with regard to the annual demand. That Officer . was not, under t,his A6l, in the situation of agent or servant of the Mayor and Commonalty ; but was in the condition of a Trustee, and must sae in his own name, to fulfil the duties of his trust. Lord ELLEN BOROUGH:—" The right to sue in the Chamberlain is a question easily disposed of, and the only doubt is, if, under the circumstance of the May or and Commonalty having a collateral security, they are to be precluded from the redress they seek in the Court of Requests ? It would be too much to oust them of this channel for the support.of their claim.". ...—Mandamus granted. TOIMLINSON V. ROSS. The Plaintiff is a tradesman at Manchester, ,the Defendant is a "cotton manufadurer, and Captain Commandant of a Corps of Volunteers, in the same town. A quantity of arms, to the amount of up wards of 3001. had been snpplied by the Plaintiff for, the use of the Corps, and the singlequestion'in the cause was, whether these articles were furnished on the credit of the Defendant ? At the trial aVerdia 'Was found for the Plaintiff in I 101. fo'r - the balance of account, contrary -to the diredion of the Learned Judge, to, whom it appeared that the evidenee was wholly on the other side., • Mr.. TOPPING opposed—the new trial sought, on the ground that it was•a question of faa, exclusively the province of the .lury, and in such cases the, Court would not disturb the verdict. The arms were sent to the faftOry of the Defendant, by his express order, and although • returned to the Plaintiff, that they night be delivered to the individuals of the Corps, each piece was tieketed with the 'name of the person for whom it was designed, so that the Plaintiff had no controul over the disposal, that he might deliver them to those persons in whom he could confide for the payment. Mr: YATES Was not required to reply. Lord ELLEN BOROUG H.—" I do riot think any thing has been said or done, with regard to former cases, by the Court, which should prevent it froth granting a new trial when the verdict" is ilire&ly - contrary to the .evidence: It may hesitate where, there is a question merely of preponderance, bUt here the evidence appears to me to ,be wholly in one scale. The Plaintiff was an original subscriber to this Corps; he knew that the individuals were to ,provide their arms and clothing at their own ex pence ; and he ought to have known, that the Com mander accepted his offers under the terms of their confederation, and not to render himself perSonally responsible for the weapons or accoutrements of the Corps. It i$ said, thnt the Defendant gave the order for the goods. If ,he is to be charged fora special undertaking, contrary to the terra S in Which they associated, this special undertaking must be shewn br.ffore he can be so charged. The Plaintiff first ap plier,.l to a Lieutenant, Mr. Owen, and finding this exped;nt hid - I - canal, he turned round and address ed himself to the Defendant. The verdict, then, is the evidence, and a new trial ought to be ~t.ar;ted L Jr-..i WrOll;.T, Silee, LAWRENCE -" The verdi& is grossly It is reasonable that the Colnmander of a Corps should have the dire - aim in such eases; for the sake of uniformity in the weapons provided." -=— New Trial granted. PAYNG V. WAY. A trial had been had upon the question of the soundner.s , of a horse, and the aainn -was btoaght upon ,rooney had and received.. -The Defendant's . Counsel had contended that a nonsuit' should be , entered, as , the • proceedings ought, to have been grounded on the warranting, and not on the 'count for money had and received this objection had been over-ruled by the Learned Judge, and a verdia hav— ing been found- for the Plaintitf,:it came to be again . ; argued before their Lordships. • - "Lord ELLENBOROUGH.—" The Defendant used these terms : If the horse is unsolind -I will take it back, and return the money:- It occurred to me, that those words raiSed.a new .corwa . a ; but I think , the aaion should have been upon the warranting. 4 • Those expressions are rather to be considered as a ' declaration to take back the horse and return the money, and ve do not, after consideration, think - that, they ; lay the basis of another contraa.. On this ground a nonsuit should have been•ebtered." WEDNESDAY, FEB. 1 . TICE 'SUNG V. T. AND WIL- LI .l:S. It will be remembered that. Sir V. Gies, a few clays ago, obtained .a Rule to shew cause why a cri minal information should not be,olstained against the at;oveAymed Defendants, for ret . ns'aig to grant a li • cense to mson of the name of Watkins, to en able him to open a. public-house in _Portsmouth Dock. - Mr. ADAM, in -sheaving cause against the Rule, said, that the reason of the Magistrates refushrg to grant the licenio was purposely concealed' iu the-affi davits for the presecut;on. The real ground was, on account of the groSs misbehaviour of Watkins while he.was perinitted to retain his former lieense. During the time that a number of j-lis Majesty's' Troops werequartered at Portsmouth, the Defendant entered into a contra& with Government to supply' the horses with stable-room ; but instead. of taking proper care of them while the animals were under his charge, he employed them to carry out his beer; and, upon expostulation by ont of the : Corporals, Watkins raised a large slick, and lined* the man aowb. . . Sir VICARY GIBBS interrupted Mr. ADAM, and ex pressed his hope that the afrair might be postponed till next Term, as he had. no opportunity of examin ipg the affidavits produced by the Defendants. Mr. ADAM ,replied, that_ he did-not wish to press the case, but the . Defendants felt their 'charaelers concerned, and desired the. matter to be investigated as soon as possible.. • The Court, however, recommending that the ques tion should be postponed, the case was agreed to be brought forward. next Term. . NIGUOLSON AND WIFE V. PARKER. Sir V. Glits . shewed cause against a Rule obtain ed by Mr. Astor, calling on the Defendant to chew cause why a writ of prohibition should not istie, dire&ed to the Judge of the Ecclesiastical Court. — The Learned Counsel said, this was an aaion for slander, in which words of a very gross ,nature had passed between the wife of the Plaintiff and'the De fendant. The case assimilated to that Of Hunt v. Jones, where slanderous words s'poken . by , the De fendant had prevented a Gentleman of fortune from marrying the Plaintiff. The Learned Counsel 'added, that if any chastisement were to tie infliaed upon the Defendant, the Ecclesiastical 'Carlo was coMpetent, and not less willing than their Lordships. Mr. ABBOT, in‘.support of the M i lle, objeted to the jurisdiaion of the Spiritual Court; and their Lordships concurring in opinion, the Rule was made absolute. MANDAMDS TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF LAND-TAX FOR THE TOWN OF WAKEFIELD, YORKSHIRE. . Mr. WOOD applied to the Court for a Mandamus to the abae Commissioners, direling them to ap-: point a . Gentleman of the name of Smith to be their...clerk, he having been duly eleaed. The Court were of opinion that Mr. Smith hav ing been eleOed by majority of votes, in case of the non-payment of his salary by the Commission ers, Might maintain an AiStion at Law, and therefore dismissed the application. THE KING V. MARGETS. This person had been indieted for making a false affidavit, with a view of obtaining his discharge un- • der .the Insolvent A&. • Mr. GASELEE this day - applied to their Lordships for a Rule to shew cause. - whylresh interrogatories should not be exhibited against. the Defendant; and an, accomplice of the name of Obenham, 7.‘-has confined at the same titne with the- Defendant in the King'S Bench Prison. On account of the informality of the affidavit upon Which the Motion was-made, their Lordship refused the objetSt of the application. examined . ftkithem, and had € , artna ate express authority, 11101 WAs to be fotind in a book eti titled', The VraOice and flutes of be Courts of Ding's Bench * s and Common ~ by Mr. Prothonotary George (.) . 00k,.,page 135. Here his Lordship read the: whole of that entry, .by which it appeared that. the constant pra6tice of .the 0 Court of COmmon Pleas was That where the"Dotendant is Super-' ed • - sed for want,or proceeding to judgment, the Plain • tiff may afterwards proceed to judgment,.huct take the Defendant in execution therein,; .but if the De fendant be superseded for_want of being (barged, in execution (:vhich was the case, now hefore the Court) • he shall not *afterwards - be Jaken in execution."-,- Upon these authorities, the,Court was of opinion that the Defendant Could not be , taken again in this case, _ he haVing been 'once dis Charged after judgment, and that for want of being charged in execution;, for al though this Note. of Mr. : Pr,Athonutary. Cook ap plied to, the pra6tiCe of the COLIMIOII Pleas, yet geared to have been . de - cided.,upon consultation with the court of King's Bench,:and therefore, must .be *taken to be. 'the praaiceof both Courts ;. for these reasons, the Rule fOr discharging, 04q Defendant most be made absOlute, and, as, it was An irregu larity in the proCeedings, it 'mist be with costs. Mt. WOOD said, he hoped the Court would dire& that the Defendant, .in this case, should •not bring any aaion for false imprisonment.. Mr._ in obScrved, that his 'Client was only agent the business, ..d could not undertake that Matter. . • * ." . 71\ir..fitstice.LAWIIENCE---r“ Then the COurt , • snspend the Rule until he does." Upon which Mr. Wtot.F.,y undertook that no aaion should bo brouo - ht,,and the Rule for the Defend4nt,'s discharge was wade plasolute. • • An Inquisition was' taken on ,Tpesday eyening- at 016 King's Arms, onthe Aaon.road, ,on the body Of James Winterbern, who was 4und dead on .the preceding evening, in 'a lane adj9iningthe,turnoike road. It appeared in evidence, that the deceased was a respectable e - - ,lnd wealthy farmer at a village in Hertfordshire, and that be left 'his - home for town on horseback on Monday. The cause of his death= could tidt be aScertained: the only evidence adduced was - thk of a Waggoner of the name of 13Yng, who found the body. He stated; that the, deceased 'was in a ditch, 'arid the horse he' had rdde was, standing by 'him with the bridle broke, and the saddle, Whieh was dirty, had only one stirrup. The debeased, it appeared, was often drunk. The *Tiny concluded • that his death was accidental. PUBLIC-OFFICE, MAR LE OR OUGH-STRER4'.7r o rTip. masSitith, a lad of about 16 yearsof age, was; c,Carg,- ed on suspicion of stealing a silver watch; out of the cabin of a barge on the Paddington . Canal, where he had hired himself as' a labourer: -- -He was not seen to steal the watch, and the person to whom it was -offereld id pawn could not eitheridentify the person or the watch ; but sooner than the risk of a criminal prosecutiori, he offered to enter. into the Royal Marines, which tiaras agreed to. Bow S-rit:i.. 7 --In consequence. of a Mr. Elgar being hustled 'a'..few:days since, awl robbed of pro perty to the aniount . of 1001. i thp nei4 - hhourhood of Bond -street, Miller, Young .Crocker, .and. two other Officers, went' on Tuesday, afternoon to the spot, for the purpose of making observation; ,they took their station in apublic-hOuse Commanding a good view : _of ; the street, where .they had , not re mained many minutes before Long Clark and ,his gang . appeared, consisting of Dick Hilliard, :and,Joe Evans the Officers (to use a techniCal phrase) bolted out. of-the hen, grabbed the whole of - them, 'and took them to a public house, in order to search them ; after which Crocker went to pro Cure two .Iraekney coaches to convey them to the Office : in his way he met the -well-knoWn filer. Dew, an active leader df another gang of these daring robber's; - Whont he secured. In the'evening the whole of them were-brought before ,Mr. BOND, the Sitting Maoistritte,-who very properly committed them as reputed thieves, under the Police A. Joe Evans was only discharged a few Says ago at the We'stininster Sessions. DeW about umelve months since arrived from Botany Bay, where he-had been seven yBars, for being concerned with the: notorious Arthur Conolly - , Joe Gregory, and Ikey. Bull, in bustling, a Merchant; in Cornhill, and picking his pocket of 7001. The principal inhabitants and Corporation of Eye appeared in deg!) mourning on Sunday se'imight, as, a mark of resped for ihe.late -noble -Marquis CORN.. \yaws, and walked in procession to church, where the, organ played that solemn anthem, " Thetrurn4 pet shall sound,' and the dead shall be raised." The tradesmen df the town, and his Lord±ip's tenantry in the neighbourhood, also paid a tribute to his me mory, by appearing in mourning on :. Suiiday last, when the parish church of, Culford?was hung with On i iVeduesdeylse'nnight, about two o'clock in the afternoon, the earth frdm the roof of a coal-pit, at Horsforth, about 20 yards deep, fell in ; two men and a boy were at work in the pit; the boy was killed by the earth falling upon him; the [nen Jived some time after, and could plainly be heard by. the people who flocked from, every part to dig them out. One of them survived till four o'clock ,the next morning, at least he Was,never after heard. He had previously said, that both his fellow sufferers.were dead. No labour was spared to get them out; but as the people increased their exertions, the earth fell in more and more, and at last completely buried the poor colliers. • On Saturday se'uaight in the eveni`eK, a son of Mr. Burton's, on, Westgate, common, *near - Wake, field, after 'having imprudently sacrificed 'too freely: to Bacchts, galloped with uncommon ,speed down the street, on the south side of . Wakefield parish.. church, and rode with such violenc. against a cart which was passing.down the .street before him, as coMpletely to overset- the cart, and precipitate him self over it, and the valuable horse on which he was mounted was killed.• Almost by.a miracle he him, self escaped without material injury. The Peggy, from Guernsey, bound to Exeter, was driven .ashore on Thursday night the 23d ult. and wrecked, and the Crew unfortunately perished, at-Vest Benexenton, near Abbotsbur : shy was laden with old rope, old canvas, and cloth. The Master's name was THOMAS IVIARGANN. LIME V. LOWE. Lord ZLLENBOROVGI/ observed, that this was a case which had been argued by Mr. WIGLEY on the one side, and Mr. WOOEI•on the other. It was a case in which the Defendant had' been arrested, gone into prison on mesne process, had judgment against him, but was discharged out.of custody on a supercedeus, for want of being _charged in execution, and the question was, " Whether having been 'so superseded, for want of being charged in execution in due time, he was, according to the praaice of the Court, liable to be taken into execution on a ca. So. on that:judgment ?" On looking at the printed Rule' of the Court of the 16th Geo. 11. the Court found iii the Margin a note, by whiCh the practice appeared to hive been laid doWn thus :—" If a Defendant be superseded for want of proceeding before judgment, yet the PlNintiff may, after judgment, take the De fendant in execution ; but it is otherwise if the De fendant be superseded for want of being charged in execution." The Court had not confined its re searches to this Nc.lte in the margin of its own Rules as an `explanation of them, but, had LON N : rimed by RICH A R II ARRI S, of NO, 4, Manlett.court,, Bow-street; and I 3 Jblished h) W:L L MAN M IG.E ft SCRIPPS , of South) Molt Ordersfor the cr, Letters for the Eciitv-, &o. !cost-paidi, At the SUN • oFFICE, No. .51,rand 3 where ridiertisJinentic A Patent has keen grantetto a person at Sheffield, for a method cf- manufa&uring zinc. It -has beta found that zifrd- ; cif n-temperature between 210 :ieg. raid 30.9 deg,:of Fahrenheit, is not only very malle able; but may be passed through rollers or dri,v'n into wires. Zinc, does not return to its former par tial-brittlenpss after being thus wrought, but con tinues soft; flexible, and-extensible, and may be ap -plied to a-number of - uses for which this metal was before , t bought unfit. On Mpnday,.the 27th ult. as'a person of Kingsley, near Frodsliam, was out shooting, he stood still ire the- Open- field twi th the gian - rtsting on his aria look , ing at some birds, during which time a hawk'earnu and lighted on the muzzle of his gun, and looked, earnestly at•liiin, 7bUt when he stirred. the . gun, it fic:w,away seemingly in great frig ht.--(Ckester Chru nick) Sllll' PA'S POOLE, PERAV A.R Arrived—the Mary, Lirtywr q from Dover; Industry, dus, from 14'eytnouta ; /ton, Holloway, from P ,, ri.moutlii And•Elilabetlr, RC from f\Jewfountliand. Sailed—the Good Ihr.mr, Thatchell, tur Southampton ; SpUrtier, Hope, ki,pithead, Active, ,Boynes, IVi - Severi, - tor Portsinuttli ; Provi - - Tucker, and Ann, Bartlett, for !,ivcrpoo!. :c:ce, GRAVESENL . ; F' . .11. PAtitd by'—the Reliance, Davidson, item hunaica. —the Nutwell, Dodds, tur arnaica ; Itottetd, Clark anti' lbe; Eandnales; tor Harnbro'. SIR HIS . . On the 4th inst. at Little Bookhatn, Surrey, the Lady of Major-C,;eneial Manningharn, ofa Daughter. MARRIED. On the tth inst. it" St. Nlzirgaret's, in Lynn, William Wheatley. ker, I.:ieu.renant - in the ad. Dragoons, of Rupl Scots Greys, to. Aliss Melvin, only daughter o f M r . 312C0/144, 01 7 SUfWid), - Yesterday, at Inc Parish Church of St. Luke's, Chelsea, John Ridge. Esq. ot - Sprilig:gardens r Chiaing-Cross, to Miss I) 4 arice;,_ of Sloais4-sti:cet., WED , On TueSday 'it his : brother's hOuse, in New Bona. street, iiekiry -SanfoiLl, 4sq. of ‘yalford, in th e fi County'of Somerset. Qn,the ;Bth ukt..-in-Gre.at Partin - id -street, Jonathan Pray Coffin, Es 4. aged 42, of Tregone, Curn‘vall. vii Sattudiy the Btli inst.: at her .hOtise at I3elmont, Bath, after a Ong and severe illness, M Margaret Rainhonillett. . Oti - Suri(lay .tiie 9th :last. Nlrs.'ltobert ilak , :er, of Queen.. square., .Liluorns7tyaiy. - the saute diy, at Putney,; Mrs. Anne 11 . fourgue. Lately, in - Cavan, at a very advancLA age, -Mrs..Margaret 13,Ortovves', . • . _ 4 R1(.1. 01' STOCKS. YESTERDAY. Bank Stalk, Inciia Stock,-4g6} N, , vv 5 per Cent.. 92 1 a India Botidc, 35 45. pr. iriztus ; Exchequer Bills, 3s. 4s. pr: 4 pe . r Cent. 20 • I Oinnium, per Ct. Red. 61 14 3 per Cent. - deferred., 3 per Cent Con 613 61f Imperi3l 3 per Cent. 6o Bank 1.. Ann. 17 13- ibtits Unto Ann. 9 it.l6thsi . COll5. for 27t11 Feb. 614.•• „ . I ' No. zg, Arundel -street, - Sept. r 3 ,, • ..,U,Oll- Eleven ,Years relinquished all other Praaice for the Treatment of Venereal Cum plaints, and the cure of those deficiencies which are tne consequences - of a deStrutive Nt'he u donbteci qUalifications which 1 *sess, as a Clem.. leer of the Royal C!*llege of Singeons,forniptlY a Surgeoirin the Arm',' and the of toy experience in this peculiar line, Constitute my claim to that superiority, winch cannot be'attaiued by . Nye, illiterate, or even.hy the rngst rs2celal)l4 general Pradirtioar,--who'se - !hint, is lia_rassecf by attention to. an immense-vatjety"of Disorders, The very singular complaints of Disease and Debility, its. which 1 rom - every part of the World I have been consulted, must have considerably canduced ; .to my portedcoinpreiten, m coinpreiten sion of the oit'crimpticateci Cases. If Diseases arise from the indiscretion of an unguarded tfio- - ment, - and - i f Cases of distressful disarrangement do ' exist, as those which are the 'consequences of an ltabitltat. vice, can any Man assume a better title to treat them than a regub SUigeOn, reSigning allot P radice tor she Treat..- nient of these, .and concentrating his attention and studies to this particular'poirit ?' In recent Cases - of Infedion, all Paiq, Danger,. and Dis tress may be avoided,.and in the first sensations of focal.. Weakness, mirth future misery may be prevented,' by spell , Means of re-animation as will restore health and strength to the tonruitutien. , : Through inconsiderate neglea the sligiltet cases become important,' but it is the acqUirement of exclusive experienco, in this line to give ,a sate amid pernlaneut restoration, even • When other Praait,i,in.:rs have failed. • . 'Fite terms of remuneration are precisely stated .on the-first 'interview, but'no letters are answered unless A Bank Note is - inclosed. MARTI 4 DREE" • Member of theßOyhi Coii - dge of Surgeons inL.6:46n. No. z 9, Arundel -street, Strand, near Temple-bar. There - is an additional entrance in %Vater-street, • To THOMAS TAYLOR, Es(l Sir, • .No. 9, New Bridge-street, London. ICONSIDEI' it but au a& of justice clue to the merits of your I. EAR. E's PAT ENT IL LS,• to coni_ municate to you the.following Cure which . has recently beett performed by 't - hcan —An Acquaintance of !nine by rho breaking out of an old Venereal Complaint (attenCled_by a complication of - disorders arising therefrom), was reduced al most toa skeleton; and although he had the best medics[ advice which could be.obtained i and tried a variely of Patent ,Medicines, nothing could be pnycu red • which seemed to suit 'his case, or to (19 him auy, service lie rinnained in a most re. duced and' pitiable situation lbt• Iwo years, linable iv follow . his profession, and scarcely a iy• ble to alle . o - i eveil to. ,stand ors . his legs ; fad no one who kneo,-liim ever supposed it pos sible for him to recover. He advised at licit to try your Leake's Pills—he did so, adhering strictly to the direaions given with them. He had nut taken inure than two boxes be- - tore he found an alieriitin fi• the better: . this encouraged him to proceed, and by taking a few boxes More,he found his appetite and stiengtli - gradnally return, and is now'as health!. and stout as any man I know. 'You are welcome, . Sir, ro toter any 'person to me for a confirmation of the above account if it should be (foubied. I am, Sir, yOur Obeilieilt - humbleservant.'' • Library, Folkstone, THOS. PURDAY.. July io, 1505. Prepared and Sold• by the Sole Proprietor, T Hos. TAYLOR, Nlember of the Royal College of Surgeons, London, at his House, NO. 9, New BridgeL street ; Where, after a constant residence of more than Forty. _Years, , in a practice paitiettlarly (iil-e6led. to the Cure oi• Vene real Complaints 'and those incidental to the ,Parrs o f . Generation in both Sexes, with that inviolable secrecy , which Men of his Profession- should always obserxe, he • flatters himself; the advice, arid assistatKe be!grattlitoUs ly administers to Persons taking this _Medicine, will be esteemal by a itisentitig Publit; as an advainage seldom to be'obtained, and void of ambiguity. Also scld, by his Appointment, tor the conyenience of those liVing at a distance, at tht. Perthmer's, No. 35, St. Al bari's-y:trect, Pall trill ; the - Toysinip, No. 103, street ; Mr. Dlsborcairw.,• No. , T Fish-street-tuft; - Mr. • Baxter's, South-bridge,, Edinburgh • Mr. Glas- . govt ; Mr. Callwell's ; Billinge's, , Liverpool ; Mr. Atkinson's, Manchester ; and by one •Perscti...:R•elreff considerable Town in Great Britain and Ireland, irk.Sox:s of only as. ca. each, sealed up with full and pialridirec tions, whereby persons of 'either sex may cure themselves with ease, speed, secrecy, and safety. • - • . N. B. Every Box sold in Great Britain is' _seated upywith a stamp, on which, by tavour of the Comthissioners, is print. ed, at me Stanip-office, " T. Taylor, 'No. 9, New Bitrige street," to imitate which is Felony, and all others are coun terfeits. ran-str,W,; must be addressed. _ ~_~