The Sun. — London, England, 1817-08-06 00:00:00

rash, stul they luta tirerefote to gO away as tiny 6,tne. On the Whit le . , he argued that in a case Of • Ltti , i, his Lordship, thou4b it might go to ri Cmitl fit Law, would on no account order the detep'ihsw, as was usual iu canes of this kind, to keep an account of the various brushes he sold, And theretdre, lie hoped, from the body of evi- Ylence• hef,ire his Lordship, and the delay which hteu oecaSioned by the plaintiff, Oust he would , tistibiqs it withiust the usual order. Mr FIFALn folluwed nn the same side, and real over Ihe vnrions affidavits. Mr LF.A.Cti, on the other side, contended, that perhaps there never was x question of greater im pot .ance to the public than the present ; first, it *as nuportapt to the parties in a pecuniary point ot • and it was important to the public as tar as 11 tegauded parents. ln point of importance, there ore, it was a matter of no moment whether the (peoint, a irs a hair brush or It steam engine. The patent w.ts taken by the plaintiff in conse gnetoltot ht< inventiag a new way of arranging the hair io brushes, and if such was the case, how could any one say it was an invention to which the principks on which a patent was granted were not applicable ? His Lordship had heard several affidavits re-td, hit bath one of the parties who made these affidavits ventured to swear that there Was no new arrangement of the hair in the new brush( s ? The Loft° CHANCELLnR.—If this patent be for a new arrangement being made in the hair, how can you or any pe•son suppose that a patent can be supported, while it is granted for one thing, and y , •t its holder says it is for another ? You say the patent is for a new kind of brush, hut %bat is the cause of your patent not specifying the parti cular difference between your improvement and the former kind of brushes. I confess this case his as much amused me as it has done the other pers►+ns in Court ; but, Mr. Leach, your patent, I must say, is not by any means so sl►rcifie as it ought to he, I must own that I doubt whttber it can possibly stand. Mr. Lyac continued.--He considered the stamping of the brushes as a matter of the greatest moment to the cause. and he regretted notice of it had not been taken it► the affidavit. of his client; but certainly, ►whether the plaintiff had a patent or not, it was a matter of much consequence to him that the brushes of the defendant should not be put to sale as if they had been made by the plaintiti ; and perhaps on this account an injmtc lion might again be anplied to from the Court. Sir S. Itotutta.Y.-I . Ve deny using the words of the plaintiff. Mr. LEACJI.—True, butyou use the same mean ing. On the point of delay,-some complaint had been made ; hut there was no reasonable ground, for his client had shewn every anxiety to gut the case hrouitht to trial, hut had been iud►iced to r n4 k, it a Speci,ilJury case, in consequence Of its i,►iportance• to the public. Mr. TaEsLovg follo►ved on the same side, and olerced, that it► a conversation he had the ho nou► to h.►ve ►with his Lordship in his private room some time ago, his Lordship expressed great doubts respecting the valid ry of a patent which covered the whole of a machine, especially as his Lordship considered every such machine where a patent was granted, most he wholly new. These brushes were not well liked formerly, but had now come into great repute, and it ►vas for Sir S. Ito mily to say how such was the case. Sir S. Rostua.v.—Mr. Treslove does me high honour indeed, hut I leave him the task of judg- • fag how revolutions in the public taste are ac complished. The LORD CHANCELLOR.-1 . have examined this old brush, Mr. Tresiove, and I see it is rather an odd kind of thing ; butt when you and I get so old. and are so well worn as it has been, we shall be as antique. 'Mr. TKESLOVE said be bad advised his client not to shell' the brush. The Loup CHANCELLOR,—Then I must say he was bound to thew it ; tor if an injunction is granted by this Court, or by any of the other branches connected with it, the article on which such an injunction is granted m►►st be, and in future I do' peremptorily order that it shall he, lodged with the Master. I remember in a case of waste, that a person in this Court, who made an affidavit, actually affixed his oak trees to his affidavit, to shew the Court of what nature the trees were. From this time forth let it be understood, that •I order every article on which an injunction is granted, to be on no account or pretext whatever taken out of this Court. - Sir S. ROMILLY was about to reply, when--. ! The Loan CHANCELLOR.-Sir Samuel you may save yourself the trouble of replying, as I have made up my mind on the question. I am decidedly and clearly of opinion that the plaintiff is not by any means entitled to the relief he asks for by his ap plication for the injunction in the first instance. It May, he useful for tradesmen to know, as I see a liitimber ofthem in Court, that though they may manufacture a certain article in the course of their trade, yet they are not at liberty to sell it to the Wolld as the property which had been manufac tnred by another. I do not know perhaps if I make mvselruaderstoad, hut I mean.that A can nOt publish'any work or sell any thing as the pro perty of B, unless he distinctly avows himself to be the agent of B. The Court have already, as all of you know, decided this in a variety of in stances. Day and Martin's blacking came on before . its last summer, and it was then held, that though a firm of a similar nature was established with that of, Day and Martin, yet that firm could not sell their liquid as the liquid manufactured by the ori ginal Day and Martin, even though the original - firm had never obtained a patent, and did not al ledge in' the slightest degt tie that they had such a patent. The same decision had been given re specting the Wonderful Magazine, where' you know it was decided, that though many . Wonder ful Magazines might be published, still the per sons so publishing fl'ad no right to pass their Ma gatines as the productions of the plaintiff. I re rueraber also- a case in the Strand, where a Mr. My4on had a sigu-board " Myson's shoe ware- Louse," and another tradesman wishing to rs tablish a rivalship, placed his son in the very - next . shop, and put tip a sign -board, " My Son's shoe warehouse,'' thus wishing to pahn his son's shopon the public as Myson's shop. The Court, in this case, came precisely to the saute conclusion as I feel • - t myselfbonna to come to in this. am p east( With the argument of Mr. Treslo-ve, who, in tLis, as in every other case, does much 'credit tt; se lf and justice to his client, and 1 eery:nreli re 7 member the conversation he now alludes tom. 1 am well aware of the opinion I then gave in the case, and one which I still do adhere to; though I am ready to admit, that during the time I have been at the Bar, and resided here, much altera tion has taken place respecting the law of Patenti. Had this application for the injunction been fairly made to the Vice-Chancellor, and had he been put fully in possession of all the'facts which have this day been) laid before me, I know his Honour wool& decidedly have refused the in junction. Imust here say, that his honour should will:out doubt have been informed that there was an action pending in the Court of,King's Bench, not at the instance of the patentee, but of the de fendant by a scire facias ; "and he vvould unques tionably have in that case at once refused the injunction ; but being furnished, as he was, with such a deficient state of facts, he could not do otherwise than he did. The opinion I gave to Mr. Treslove was what I always felt, and was in deed the principle on which I acted during the short tune I held the office of Chief Justice in the Common Pleas; and indeed' it is, in my opinion at least,fOunded on equity and just views of law. I n this particular instance, when one sees that the p a t en t was granted in September, and the applica tion for the injunction was only made- in July, and when the practice of the Court in every in stance is considered, I am bound no say, I will trot allow the injunction to be supported. The con duct also of the patentee in allowing a scire facia: to be raised against hint, made the case more against him ; and therefore Ido hereby order the injunc tion to be dissolved, and let it he this omment dissolved. lam anxious always, in every instance,' to preserve the rights or patentees, but I ant not here put in possession of such facts as would induce me, or any fudge, to consider this sufficiently made out for my sustaining it. For the purpose of establishing the practice of the Court, I do hereby peremptorily order that the brushes taw produced, and spoken of in the affidavits, be lodged in the Master's office, as exhibits, and let this be the practice in all cases in future. *f he parties may do as they please with the law suit, but I .shall nut interfere, nor Make any other order than for the immediate and absolute dissolu tion of the Injunction. "Vou may do as you like about the suit scire facias, hut perhaps, Mr. Leach, the stamping might be put on the junction dissolved. The Court was extremely crowded dining this discussion, and the decision gave general satisfac tion. We never saw the Hall so lidl as it was on this occasion, and touch amusement was af forded by the ludicrous exhibition of the brushes. His Lordship rose at half -past four, and will during the present Sittings come every day into Court at cite o'clock. roLicr INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. CHARGE OF F 0 RGau .—George Pearson, a young man of decent appearance, was charged with hav ing uttered a check, purporting to be uPritwtx by Nathaniel Aches,m, on the house of Messrs. %Vit.. Hams and Co. Baulter3, of Birchin-lane, for 2251. on Saturday last. The prisoner presented the check, which was immediately suspected to be a forgery. He eras detained while the fit tu sent fur Mr. Acheson, who confirmed the suspicion. The defence was admitted to. be ingenious. it was, that a person called at the how of his mas ter, who is a printer at ‘Vhitefriars, when no one was at home except the prisoner, and desired to pay a bill for 50/. due to his master,. presenting at, the same time the check for 2251. ; that the pri soner hesitated on being asked to go to the banker's, but at length complied, under the idea of the necessity of getting so serious a sow in a lump for his master; that on his way to Birchin lane the stranger prevailed upon him to go to the banking-house alone and receive the amount of the check, upon doing which he was. apprehended. The prisoner also said that he bad frequently received at Williams's bank 5001. at a clam for his master —He was remanded. QUEEN-SQUARE. INHUMAN ROBBER Y.—Richard Baker, a seafar ing man, was brought before the Magistrate by one of the Chelsea Constables, charged by Jo seph Slater, an out-pensioner, with robbing him of H coit. Prosecutor having long been out of employ ment,' was so distressed that he had long been living on his clothes, and on Saturday last was re duced to sell his only coat, and to borrow the waistcoat he - then wore. From mere hunger he was on the point of selling it for 35., but prisoner advised him not to take it, and said he was sore he could get him 7s. fur it. Witness told hini he should have all above ss. for his own use Pri soner took the coat to sell, went away with it, and when he (witness) met him some time after (about half an hour) he denied any knowledge of the coat. The Constable said, that being sent. for, he made inquiries, and found prisoner had been at the houie of a man who deals in clothes. Wit ness went thither, and the man told him he had bought a coat of the prisoner, for which he had Paid 65," He took the prisoner into custody, and the coat was produced and sworn to by the pro iecntor as his property. The prisoner was fully committed. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. NOVEL MODE-OF ROBBERY.—Geo. Cousens, sweep, about 18 years of age, was charged with attempting a. robbery at the house of M. Jones, No. 7-1, Crawford-street, under the following ex traordinary circumstances :—About fotir o'clock yesterday morning the prosecutor was awakened by - hearing a noise in his chimney. His wife had left some clothes by the kitchen tire, and he, sus pecting they were On fire, went with one of his lodgers, named Keene, into she kitchen, where the' clothes were all safe. They then %vent out on the" roof, •and saw the prisoner getting out of the chimney pot, when they took him into ells tody.—Several similar charges were made against the prisoner.; one, for felony, by a Mr. Hobson, at the next house.---On the first charge be was committed as a rogue and vagabond; and re manded on the other. ftor3 the LON DON GAZETTE, Aag. 5, IS i 7. Whitehall, -dog. 4, 1817. His Royal Highness the Prince Regent has beers pleaied to appoint Hugh Ltwis, Esq. Coroner of and within the ices, liberties, and franchises of the Duchy of Lancaster situated within the counties of EsseN, Hertford, Middlesex, and tint rey. Commissions signed by the Vice Lieutenant of the County of i• Berke. - To he Deputy-Lieutenants, Sir Charles Saxton, Bart., Thos. ,Y.3owles, Esq., Thomas Duffield, Esq., Timothy flare Al.t almn Earle Esq., Charles Garth Cußeton, Esq., tobert ralniei - , Esq. Royal Berks Militia, John Blairave the younger, 'Esq. to be Lieutenant-Colonel, rice Viscount FOlkstutre, resigned. itßegiturnt of lierkshire'Cavalry. Worgrave Rangers—,-jaiiies Sharp, Gent.. to be Cornet. Abingdon Troop—Cornct NVilliain Clarke to be Lieutenant, vice Miller, deceased ; William Davis, Gent. to be Cornet, vice Clarhe, promoted. Commissions signed by the Lord Lkutenant of Use County of Ayr. Ayrshire Yeomanry Cavalry—James Fairlie, jun. Gent. to be Lieutenant; John Campbell, Gent. to be Cornet, William Cowan, jun. Geut. to he ditto. Cuningliam and Cumnock Corps of Ayrshire Yeomanry Ca-, valry—Thowas Rankine, Gent. to be Cornet. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. William lienlock, Distaff-lane, sugar-baker, from August 9 to September c.. 7. BANKRUPTS. - John Mitchell, East-street, Finsbury-market, brewer, to stir .render AtNnit 9, 16, and September 16, at one, at Guild hall. Attorney, Mr. Clarke, Bishopsgate-street- without. James Warner, kilby-bridge', Great Wigston, Leicestershire, litue-❑ierehant, August IS, 19, and September 1.5, at eleven, at the White Hart Inn, Leicester. Attornies, . _ _ llelsrs. Alexander and Holme, New Inn, or Mr. Bond, Leicrster. Jacob Ilannaford Mann, Avetnn-Gifford, Devonshire, cyder merchant, August 16, 19, and September 16, at ten, at ' Guildhall, London. Attorney, Mr. Robert, Graystock place, Fetter-lane. _ John Eitunto ad, Liverpool, spirit-merchant, August 22, 23, and September 16, at eltiven, at the George Inn, Livirr . pool. Att. rues, Messrs. Griffith and Hind, Feuwick- Si rect, Liverpool. Charles Davis, Southampton-row, Bloomsbury, cabinet ►uaker, August 9, 19, and September 16, at. eleven, at Guildhall. 'Attorney, Mr. Poole, Adam's -court, Old Broad street.. William Day, Providence- buildings,NewKent-road, plumber, Aug. 16, 2.3 4 and September 16, at eleven, at Guildhall. At torney, Mr. .Nlarson, Newington-Butts. Edward Hannitin, Threadneedle-street, ship-broker, August 9, at twelve, and September 16, at ten, at Attorilies, Messrs. Reardon and Davis, Curbet-court, Ur:wee:Lurch-street. Robert Meacoek, Liverpool, ship-chandler, August 20, 21, and September 16, at one, at the George Inn, Liverpool.— Attornies, ,Messrs. Crump and Lodge, Liverpool, or Mr. Battle, Chancery-lane. DIVIDENDS. Aug. 26, U. Marsh, Brentford, boot-maker—Aug. 26, J. Shutt, Paternoster-row, tea-dealer—Aug. 27, I'. Mansell, Stow on the %Vold, Gloucestershire, draper—Aug.2B, J.Scar borough, Slue Wen, Huntingdonshire, innholder—Aug. 29, W. Scarourough, Stilton, Huntingdonshire, innholder—Aug. 26, J• Rowe, Cast lr-st tett, Falcon-squarr, merchant=-Ang. :it), J. Amos and C. Sutherland, St. Helen's-place, merchants—Aug. 8'), A. Adair and I). Cunningham, Winchester-street, mer chants—Sevt. 4, J. Salisbury, • Exeter, cabinet-maker—Aug. 23, F. Hetherington, Louring, Cumberland, cattle jobber— Aug. cti, H. Duckworth, Manchester, liquor merchant—Aug. 26, J.'Pichering, Hatton-wail, oil•ruttn—Aug. 26, B. Cohen, Bishops Kate-street, merchant—Sept. 20, J. i,Naisti, Edward street. Cavemiish-square, glass-stainer—Aug. 26, J. Watkins, Chapel-street, May-fair, grocer—Aug. ' J. Hawkins. Ita dipole, D'irsetshire, brewer—Atte:. 26, E. H. Shorty, Exeter, cutler—Aug. 27, J. Goo,!year, Hood-grange, Yorkshire, fai mer—Aug. 26, J. Cullimore, Lawrence Pountney-lane, merchant. CERTIFICATES, Aco 26. J. Cull, Wareham, Dorsetshire, brtwer--:A. Morgan, Car marthen, milliner—C. Whitting, Bristol, plumber—and T. H. Taylor, Tot nes, Devonshire, merchant—R. Curtis and T. Hal I, Angel-court, Throgmot ton-st reet, merchants—J, Lloyd's Coffee house, insurance• broker—W. Easter field,. Fleet-market, stationer. PARTNERSHIPS DINSOLVED. T. Kilby arid J. Venables. Houndsditch,*butchers—J. Rey . wood and G. Heald, Manchester, Manufacturers—J. Gardi ner, J. Allies, and M. A. Gardiner, Bristol, hat-mau►ufac turers—it. flatland, West Lynn St. Peter's, and F. Goodwin, Kin! , 's Lynn, Norfolk, white-lead-manufacturers—J. Procter and G. SMitli, Stockton, Durham, - grocers—J. J. and A. Large, Wootton Basset, Wilts, hankers—T. Briggs arid 'l'. Minchin, Essex-street, St ranit, attornies—T. and W. Whisk in, Hand-court, Holborn, tislimongers—W. Singer and J. Gan dell, Charing-cross, auctioneers—S. R. Hesseltine and S.. Billingsley, Harwich, ship-agents--J. P. Harrison and T. Poulson, Chester, wharfingers--H. H. and G. Knight, Rat. cliffe, coopers. PROPOSALS AND REGULATIONS RELATIVE TO THE ROYAL NAVY. [Conehtdedfrom our Paper of yesterday.] V. We now beg leave to call the attention of your Royal Highness to the companies of Royal Marine Artillery. These companies were formed, one at each division, in the year 1804, for the purpose, iu the first instance, of supplying the service of his Majesty's bomb-vessels, before that time performed by the Royal artillery; but it was also intended that these companies should, 'particularly in time of peace, be employed at the respective divisions, in drilling the whole of the marines to gunnery. - We are so well satisfied of the great utility of having a considerable body of marines trained to gunnery, that we are induced to recommend that the Royal marine artillery be in creased to eight companies, as well for the purpose of en couraging and training the other marines, as to enable us, on occasions, to embark a certain number of well-trained artillery-men in others of his Majesty's ships as well as iu the bombs; experience having proved the great advantages to he derived to the service from this practice, which has been of late tried to a skll! extent. We therefore humbly propose to your Royal Highness, to be pleased to sanction the establishment of eight companies of Royal marine artillery; but in order that the whole esta blishment may not exceed what your Royal Highness has pleased to declare to be a fit peace establishment of marines, we humbly propose to transfer a certain number of officers and men from the ordinary marines to the artillery, and we hereunto subjeln schemes of the establishment of Royal ma rines and Royal marine artillery, respectively,' which we think prdper for the present period, by which the corps will consist of eighty companies, of which eight will be ar tillery. This measure, which will give great efficiency to the corps of marines, and, to use the expression of the original pro moters of the marine artillery, double its utility both ashore and afloat, will be at very inconsiderable, if with any, ex pence to the public . ; because we have proposed to reduce an equivalent number of ordinary marines, and shall farther submit some reductions in the number of officers attached to the artillery companies . : and in time of war, a farther dimi nution of expence from whA it would he under the present system, will, if your Royal Highness shall be pleased • to adopt our suggestions, arise from the following circum stances:— The Royal Artillery, when embarked in bombs, had certalh advantages granted' to them, in consideration,. we 'presume, of their being taken out of their natural course of shore ser vice • these advantages the Royal marine artillery have claim ed, and hitherto enjoyed, under, we Think, an erronerius con struction of his Majesty's Order in Council .establisbing the pay and allowances of these companies. It is evident, that however just it was to grant slid) :Oran 'tages to'the Itnyal Artillery, when removed front their ordi nary duties, it was certainty unnecessary to give them ter th m ai i ne ; winery, whose natural course of service it was to embark, and which in fact was formed for this especial pnr !IOW. We trust therefore that your Royal Highness will see the expediency of correcting this error, at this .favourable op portunity, when it can be done without any i:oniediate injury to individuals, because at present none. of 'the 'natioe artil lery are embarked, tror, according to the original regulations, would they have been embarked, in time of peace: while we therefore propose to continue the increased, shore pay, and to encourage the artillery and the corps" in general, by doubling the numbers who will receive this increased pay, we Chinn we nosy fairly. propose to abolish tine distant aunt continiient ad vantage of the estra sea pay, to which in fact we ii“olit that whur rig! , tt has hitherto existed, titan nn errooeoto, coo-- strut:Jim) of his Nlajesty's Order in (oboe 1. We therefore propose, that when the Vsoyal in:trine artA lery shall etnh rk , the sea pay of ail raiik, sh,dl hear to pay ashore. the,fartieiiropouttott that the E.Ca pay of the ia tfiner in bearsto their shore pay, For all,..fiteSe i,,,;rpi . rA herein-befor e -menti one d, we bcg leave. to sttlioiti fl this mewovial a ta!ile of !h.,• rzitcs of ltii .Majesty's Siti is , 7itri t lke force and complcmet;ts of each rate, anet,dso of the payi, ratings the area 11 the fleet, both ,;eainett a.nd marines • a nt i we recommend to your Royal Hii:,lincss, to he pit,sed to meal and annul the Table, now in force nodes Order in Council of the 3 , 5 t 1,;(56 . . rain; to sAilcillnl establish in lieu thereof, the Table. liercoato aiIIICXOI, which, for the sake of perspicuity and convenience, we ha , e distinlzslished the several classes tor . haring- the pr o d uct . of seizures, agr eea bly to your Royal Highness's Order in Coun cil of the r;th October last. We now have to so' mit to pmr Ru' al flighoess, in c,rd,n -: that the tunds the l hest and Ho , pital at ( 4 , :en , ich. of the Widows' Charity. to %xhich the IJC F fore fropo , ed to be :iliolished, tie apdlicil, may ;lint Saffrr f;y, this arrangement, - that your Enyal I.i gnus may he picasud to direct that the calculated amount of the said deducti,,.. 00 the number of otricers and Melt res wetively tnu!nyed; shall he paid over by the Navy hoard to the funds of the said institutions, tinder such regulations and checks as we limy think necessary, fur ensuring the full and equitable arrange ment of this matter between these different branches of the service; which, we have no doubt, can be atta:ned with great convenience to all the officers concerned, and williout any increase of establishment, or any cxpence whatsoever to the public. And, finally, we have to submit that the whole of this arrangermnit shall he carried into execution from and after the Ist ofJanuary next, or as soon after as conveniently may be. In proposing alterations in the present practice of the naval establishments, so important as those herein-before sub mitted to your Royal Highness, we have thought it right t.s cuter' into a detail of the motives and principles by which we base been guided. We have, ourselves, in the investigations which has led to this Memorial, found considerable incuove nience from the want of explanation as to the precise views on which former arrangements wen e made; and we therefor') humbly hope that your Royal Highness will be graciously pleased to excuse the length of detail into which, on the pre sent occasion, we bare presumed to enter. BOXING. 'The renewed battle between R. Pan", the Here fordshire navigator, and Isaac Crutchley, a far mer, from Leicestershire, took place on Aionthiv, in Batt's Meadows, on the banks of the Len, for 20 guineas aside. The men blacked each others' eyes on Thursday last, but they were stopilA after fighting two rounds. More of manhood 'hal science, and more of strength than agility, w.ts displayed. Crutchley is a 13 stone man, of ninc'a power. He had done much exectr ion arnongn the country eommoviers, but a scientific li n t i; much inferior in weight, would soon reduce lii strength. The navigator was not so poweritil ri ma", but bad a knack of bitting straight with the left hand. Eight rounds were fought in 2G mi nutes, as follows. The seconds were, J, Jones Ix Ford, and Holloway for Cri,tuhley : Round I. Crutchley was hit smartly on the head with For:rs left hand directly after shaping hands, and a rally, in whith. there was much giving on both sides, but without measure— ment or judgment, took place. At the close of it Ford went down, and both their :limey's were queered. The run, I. steel three minute,. 4. Ford missed with his left band, and was floored by D. counter hit with the right. 3. ertitchley's right eye was closed, and F , !rd was entlea vonriog to the other, when he got a chatteiing hit ow the jaw, which broughboat two teeth as clean as doctor could hare performed it,. He however resumed ing, anti in compliment, to his antagonist in the lt.s. round, be changed things about and lloored mitts 4. Ford made a good left handed hit over the bride , adversary's nose, which drew claret in abundance: A 1.0.,; awkward innings followed; and both went down weaii punished much. 5. Crutehl.y lifted one eye-lid to get sight, when Fo bored him down. Here Ford reduced fight to a certainty, by phcit,g a bl ow On his ankguiliq ' S forehead, Whiel NI and he went down rather to avoid a tzootArstiale u s e r than from the force of the blow. 7. Ford fell upon a blow. S. In this the last rounJ, Crutchley was as blind as a bat* and be was finished right out by a hit in t which prevented his coming again. The lance was of nu avail, his head was not a miller's, it swelled too touch. The Inn of the day ended in a match at sing 7 e sticks, between Farreit and Baker, and after a combat of 20 minutes, Farrell was bled nu inch, - and Baker touk the prize -)f a gaineaand a new hat. SPARRING NOT BLOODLESS.--Oliver, a first-rare pugilist, had his benefit at the Fives-court it was tie most crowded Coe rt of any daring the season. The two little men, Brown and Belasco; fought the third ,battle on the last fight:ag day, gave a good display of coinage and science, and both.had best. Belasco, who was beat by Rey nolds, shelved fine play with Lazarus.—There was also a fine treat between Belcher and Lancaster ; but the masterly action of the former kept his frame perfect. Cribb and Oliver gave an amusing treat of fine science and strength of hitting. Ifrilts sparred with Purcell ; and the little B:ack railianca a little Jew's head about most unmercifully. Is was. an interest log boot also, with Randilli "ant/ \Vest Country Dick. Several other matches oE inferior note took place, and the. candidates were so onmerous, that the Court got clear, leaving 'them at it. Scruggins and Turner were present, as also Richmond, Randal, &c. Four lots of ground for the erection of scrim houses, four on the North and three on the Sauth side of the Regent's Bridge, at Edinburgh, hi-- useen 'Princes-street and the Arch, were. last week, to a builder, for Twenty five Thorisand Pottads Ex actirtoN.—James Caste, conv;e.ed s h Qep stealing at the Ahingelf)ll Assizes, was execide i oil Saturday last, at Iteading. Castle was• the leader of a numerous •gting, and had, in company with his associates, driyen away fifty-four sheep, with an intention of 'destroyi ng t h,„,,„,- o f re _ verge to the owner, but was stopped, after 7, by the fears of his brother, convicted with hiw, but since respited. 1111:111. . Yesterday morning, lieudon, the Lady of W. W. Prrs. cott,. Esq. of a daughter.' MApRIE!) On Monday, the new I ri'sh Church of Mary4e-bone, *,jr. Vbin:ker to tilts. margatt.t. Norrie. Y es ter(4y, by 'lllt. Hutt. and 1:et...8 . :51141p of F.xel Fredcriel; tittlinston, EN only sot living ..: . ,t - twtkon ~f the ittto and L;ldy Johnst.ttn. to 1, itzabet daughter pf . Captain anti Lady Eliza:p..lh IL I:iiay. DIED. On the 3ri•inq. at Canonbury, a;?,eti 49, Sarah, widow of the late ltiChaFd Hewitt, Esti. of Muswell-hill, an! (la.ig - ,1)1‘ 4 the late Rev. Julio Hem:lottan, of I)ediliti,:t.u, fur . On Vial of May, at Rio Janeiro, Thomas' Esq. LONDON: Printed B. cAlls - rAnt ,, ,, of No. 29„Cirvat Ormood-street, Quett-square: ant Ini! , tisliod lo.r , -'V, SCRIPPS. of No. 7, Shalt h l olt.ot-,t!ect, 4t Tut: Office, No. 112, Strand; wio-re • Advvt':istonetit,. Letters, &c. (post-paid) Inuit be adtirtvd. Ita •ut the lif Et) ke