The Sun. — London, England, 1847-05-27 00:00:00

TAE St.l4, _LONDON, TIITIRSDA LAW IN TELLIGENCE. to eheck the figures ; in this case the figures had been ROLLS' COURT, May 26. first put in 24 ten but altered to twenty, at which s um it The Cuort wag ocenpieil a ll the day with the argu - I was filled up in writing. me tits in A ;art -lizard cause, which did not possess a A juror said that he thought with the witness that ,a,ticle general interest. I the writing had been altered—that the figu res had was evident. Mr. MILLER said he could not see the case in that light ; the alteration GI the 10 to 20 might be accounted fur, but in the writing it was impossible to alter " ten" to " twenty" without such visible difference as to lead to detecti6n ; where suspicion was raised by other cir cumstances, if fraud had been contemplated a chemical process would have discharged the ink, and if for the " words" why not for the " figures ?" then, as the sig nature was admitted, an end would have been put to the claim. The fact was, the witness loved his glass, and did make mistakes occasionally, and had made a mis calculation. The witness said he had never been charged with such neglect by his master, and there was no foundation for it except in the brief of the Learned Counsel. Evidence was adduced to make out the defence, but failed, but showed that the " book-keeping" was not very accurate on the side of the defendant, and that such mistakes were likely to happen. The jury found for the plaintiff. E-CIIA.SUELLORS' COURT, May 26. • (13,..•,5e iee-ChancellOr Sir J. Wiceast.) TLNNANT v. TENNANT. ilia iloNol3ll tieltwereci judi,ment in this case, which was as follow,:—The testator devised the rents of his whole estate in Swansea to his wife for life, with a resi duary b. quest to certain trustees, in order to accumulate a fund for certain purposes, and the point at issue was, whether the rents of the whole estate passed to the wife? As the whole question turned upon the exact weeds of the will, it is to cessary to set them forth ; they were as fol'ow... The testator having first bequeathed the whole of the rents of his estate to his wife for life, then pro ceeds to bequeath various sums to his relatives and friends upon her death, and concludes with these words.—" And as to the residue of my real and personal estate. not otherwise disposed of by this my wilt, I give the same to my said trustees, upon trust that they, and the survtvers of them, and the heirs, executors. and admitus•ritors of such survi%or, do and shall place out the axle at interest in some of the Parliamentary stocks 0 Great Britain, or in or upon real securities to Eogiand, Sex tland, or Wales, at interest, and do tied sail in the mean time, nail the said residue shall become pavable,-vary, alter, and transfer the same for other stocks. funds, ere; securities, so as to mute the same to lictanelaie in the nature of co m p ound interest " His H:fliikr decided that the wife was entitled to hold rents o of the whole estate f o r her life, and that they passed by the will. SHERIFFS' COURT' (Surrey), May 25. Before Mr. Under-Sheriff ABBOTT and a Sp.cial Jury.) CRIM. CON -.-CANTLEY v. COOPER. This mo, rung a special jury were empannelled at the H ,rns Tavern, Kennington, to assess the damages in this case, which was an action by which it was sought to recov , r compensation in damages tor injury sustained by the al leged criminal conversation between the defendant and the wife of the plaintiff. The damages were laid at 10,0001., and there were a large number of witnesses in attendance. Sir F. MERGER, with Mr. Peacock, appeared for the plaintiff; and Mr. Edwin James for the defen dant. The plaintiff and the defendant are both majors in the army, and have, it was stated, seen much service in India. , COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, May 26. (Sittings in Banco, bet Ore Lord Chief Justice DENMAN.) RU SSELL V. • Taos, Q.C. applied tor a rule to set aside the verdict in this case, which had been given for the plain titf, with a permit) , of 40s , for an infringement of the copy. -right of a song called the " Ship on Fire." The ;,earned C.)ufuel stated at some length, that the case had b, en tried at Guddhall, and a verdict for the plain tiff given. He now moved to set aside that verdict, on the ground that it had been given under an erro neous construction of the Act 3d and 4th William IV. It was provided by that Act, that an in fringement of a musical copyright should be con stituted by its being sung at auy opera or play of drama tic entertainment. It had in en given in evidence that the song had been sung at a place called Crosby-hall, a place of public resort, and that place had been considered by the jury to be one of dramatic entertainment. lie now contended that this hull neither came under the de scription of opera nor place of dramatic entertainment, and that the song was not of that description which was protected by the Copyright Act as an opera or musical composition, as stated in the Act, as it was not set to any psriiculaz musical air. The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE—Then you are compell. d to argue the die important branch of musical composi sition, the Oratorio, is not protected by the Copyright Act. The Court will consider of the apiiiication. --- Sir F. THEUGER said that the present proceedings had been taken for the recovery of damages by wily of compensation ; if, indeed, any compensation could be given for such a woeful injury, ter an act of criminal conversation which had been committed by the defen dant with the wife of the plaintiff, his client. But he might at once state that as the object of the plaintiff by these proceedings was, as the wife had dishonoured her husband by the commission of a breach of the marri.ge fidelity, simply to take the necessary steps for the procurement of a divorce, he trusted his Learned Friend who appeared on behalf of Major Cooper, the the defendant, would not offer any opposition to the course which he had already suggested—the more so AS the fact of the adultery had been admitted on the record—namely, that the damages should be taken for 1,0001. Mr. EDWIN JANES, on behalf of the defendant, said that in all these cases there were connexions of both parties to whom an exposure of the circumstances of such a transaction could not fail to cause unnecessary pain. With a view, therefore, of avoiding that exposure and of inflicting that unnecessary pain, and also of not offering shy impediment to the severance of an union which must in future be attended with nothing else but misery and remorse to the parties, he had advised his client to con sent to a verdict for the amount which had been named by his Learned Friend Sir F. Thesiger. Most certainly upon the record there was an admission of the guilt of the defendant, .his client. There might, nevertheless, exist some circumstances which were calculated very considerably ,to palliate and to mitigate that guilt, but inasmuch as that pain could not but be inflicted upon many innoc , :eit parties if the details of this unhappy case were gone into, he hoped he was advising his client to adopt a coarse which was not in any way inconsistent with his honour as a soldier, or with his character as a gentleman, nor contrary to the feelings which ought to actuate him as a man. BAIL COURT, May - 26. (Sitiinf , s in Banco, betor.l Mr. Justice WlGlrrnaN.) TAE UNIVERSITY of OXFORD v. TARLETON. Mr. t.owLEy moved, on behalf of the defendant, for a rule nisi, to amend a feigned issue, put forward by the plaintiffs, in regard to all that it contained re l at in g to the village of Towceste r. question in these pro c.-edings arose out of the Tithe Commutation Act. It; the vicarage was a parish called Handleigh, and the Univer.dry College of Oxford were landowners in that patiab, the tithes of which were in the course of cow muyawn. It was contended that the tithes to be paid trom flan neigh were only on corn, grain, /nay, lambs' wool, end wood, all other produce being exempt. The difference of opinion which arose with re,pect to the produce upon which tithe was to be paid cati,ed the matter to be referred to the Tithe Coni• reis,,ioner, who decided that the land was exempt from the payment of all tithe, e xcept upon corn, grain, hay, lambs' wool, and wood, and that these tithes were pay able to the vicar only. Upon this decision an action 113.1 been brought, and a feigned is:Are set forth, which he sought icave to amend. The question at issue was not svhether the tithe was to be paid to ' the vicar atone, but whether the laud .itself was fscla jet to tithe at all. Taal - was" the only iinezfiloti which could be r;.i,reil, as iho feigned issue'svi , h leg ird ao the payment to 06' ieettir only, left the re 7 ll caAe just as it was. Leave:had been given in a case called I:Awards and Banbury. tnird tol. Queen's Bench Reporv, p. 885. • He had before cited that case, 'and Mr. Justice Coleridge • had ordered all further proceed ingi in She present case to he stayed until the fourh day in this term. He now moved for this leave, in order that the case might be brought before the full t.furt. • Application granted. • REGINA. V. THE JUWFICF.S OFZIUDDLESEX. '2l verdict was then taken by consent, or rather, the (Imager Were by consent assessed at 1,0001. SURREY SESSIONS. (Befire THOMAS PUCKLE, Esq., and a Bench of Magistrates.) Henry Wilson, a young fellow well known to the police, was convicted of pecking pockets at Epsom, on the Derby day, and sentenced to ten years' transportation. Jane Green, aged 30, was indicted for feloniously stealing at Kingston-on-Thames, two pieces of silk, the pr: perty of Messrs. Shrubeoles, linen-draper, of that plane. It appeared from the evidence, that on the evening of the 21st inst. the prisoner entered the shop, and re qUested to look at some silk. Several pieces were shown her, but she made no purchase, but left the shop. She had not proceeded far before the two pieces of silk were missed from the counter. One of the prosecutors im mediately pursued the prisoner, and while he was asking her about the property, she dropped it on the pavement from under her dress. The two pieces of silk were here produced, and identified by . the prosecutor. In her defence the prisoner said that she did not steal the silk, nor did she know how it came on the pavement. The rue in tbks:etse, wwle abg,,i t ito, y es . terdu,), yrltz, ajiheation of the ebirrt, vecatted, in orde gi t alb Ltit+ etue might be brought on and argued be tore the lull C• l :urt. • CLARxis. :•• • • sir. % . f . • fbr fir an attach -113,14 against an ~.sttAoney, and Wright, his i‘,r disOb e dienee to.an order of Mr. Justice Ed, to .leer,-r np cerain papers, r hich order had been mad, a !life of ,cl.!uril Tra rule had been served personally up_n \Veils and'his clerk, and they had refused to do live r up tbapapers. • app ared :rola the. aff i davits that much difficulty wa.. apprehended in the seiviee of the attachment, as it ban been found next to impossible to serve him with the role of court. The person who had served him had caUed si,verAl times, an.l had only served him by meeting him in th.., street, sni pureeing him when he ran away. lie paid the costs ordered by the Master, but refused to obey the rui..—lide uf.i granted. Tue court afterwards sat at nisi pries, bat no case 4. any importance occurred. The jury immediately returned a verdict of Guilty, .nti the Chairman sentenced the prisoner to six months' Imprisonment. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. A young man, dressed in a sort of sea-ening attire, who g ye the name of captain John Bowers Spence, of the 89th Regiment, was brought before Mr. Alderman Moon. charged with stealing four cigars, the property of Morris Lee. Lewis Levy, in the service of Mr. Lee, a tobacconist. in Holborn. stated that the prisoner came into the ship about eight o'clock that morning, and asked fur smie cigars. Pointing-to a particular lot, he asked if they were pretty good. Witness told him they were, and hr ordered 21 worth. He also selected some snuff and , ottac and catching up a few cigars in his hand, was leaving with the vague direction to send the goods on, and he would pay the man the money. Witness re minded him that he had given no a•ldress yet, and as he had not paid for anything, he could not allow him to take any portion i.e> the cigars. He was only a servant, aed it would he irregular to do business in that way. The prisoner replied he would give hi; address, " Capt. Spence. 89th, Dover; if not there, elsewhere." Witness asked where he was stopping in town. He described the Saracen's Head, Straw-hill, but appeared not to know the name. Witness offered to accotnpassy him there with the goods, but whin they came to the inn the prisoner refused to enter, but told him to go there ant wait for about art hour, and he Weill' come to him. Witness of course did not assent to that, and continued walking with the prisoner till he met a policeman, when gave hits into cuNtGdy. The tour cigars witness saw '►im take, and three other, were found in his possession. The landlord of the Saracen's Head Hotel attended. and stated that he knew nothing of the prisoner. The ALDERMAN inquired it any thing was found on him; to show that he had given a correct description of himself ? The officer said he had neither money nor papers. ~ Mr. Alderman Moow asked the prisoner if he had any frien is said he had, at Clifton. The Ataisniatale asked him where he slept the night stet ?—tie r k plied at Chelosnham. The officer. 'stated that the prisoner had paid Mr. Latnplougti, the chemist, on nolbora-bridge, a visit the same morning, and ordered a quantity of Eau tie Col gne ztrol lavender water. The prisoner expressed some surprise that he could not, go into a shop and order goods, without being ail down for a thief. Mr. Alderman Moot asked him if he had any expla nation to offer as to ord,rinx these cigars to be sent to a plsol whore he was not known, and milking it a pretext to take four cigars ? The prisoner replied, " Upon my iOlll I don't think they are worth talking aaaut," and he stepped out of the dock as it he thought he might so finish the matter, but ' The ALDERMAN remanded him till Saturday, to as asrlain the state of his mind, and if he had any friends. M . ARLBOROUGH-STREE Divid Gribrahc, a private soldier, belonging to the 2d battalion of the Coldstream Guards, was placed at the bar charged with assaulting Mr. John Williams, No. 4, Westbourne-street, Hyde Park. The complainant stated that on the previous evening, about six o'clock, he was proceeding through Hanover square, when his attentiun was called to the prisoner, who appeared to be quarrelling,with a female. After watching them a short time he saw him strike the woman a violent blow in the face: Complainant remon strated will the defendant upon hit cowardly conduct, when, without the least reply, he (defendant) turned round, struck him on the head, land kinked his 'legs. Complainant then called fur a police-constable and gave him in charge. Mr. William Taylor, 285, It-gent-street, corroborated the evidence of complainant. The defendant, in answer to the charge, admitted striking the female, and said she was his wife, and he was only correcting her, when the geetleman came up 4riti interfered with him. He deuie.l assateting the complainant. Mr. BINGIILM said he was surprised that a man like the defendant should so commit himself, and as he had no doubt that he would be punished elsewhere, he (Mr. Bingham) should only inflict' the moderate fine of 205., r seven days' imprisonment in the House of Correction. CLERKEN WELL. John Jack J7su , d4m, a carnation the employ of Mr. Spencer, car Ges sell-street, was charged with robbing his employer sad the New Gas and Cuke Company, under the following circumstances: — It appeared that Mr. Spencer bed contracted with the Company for the p , rfornuance r of their carting work, in which the prisoner was s works for the employe d,purpose and yesterday the latter Wen; to the Company of taking out twenty four sacks of coke. In about two hours afterwards Mr. Spencer saw his waggon and horses stealing in Goldendune wiihout any person attending to them, when hi, suspicion was excited, and he- - counted only twerity•thrce sacks. Orders had been sent for the femoral of twenty-four by the company. . The prie-iier soon afterwards came Out of a court, when inquiries were "'Tie, and as it .wa s f oun d t h at h e h a d sol d a b..g of c o ke" , i thre, he was give n i n t o custody. e prisoner w As fully committ...d. Jojlinoh(n;ilbGeornifcc:ll; Lennie GWlna'n' WES MINSTER. James Coffer, and with Navin powerful ii w n e e rfFl Irish lab ourers , were c h arge d g,, i n asveral othera not in custody, committed the ' fi f l ' i n ow" ith desperate an d murder ous assaults; and Ellen Gornt'anng and Cuth Gorman steam-boats, were also charged with asseuiting the police, . and b : t t s - , t e mpting to rescue the male prison,,rs. Matthew Minter, a labourer empl oye d on t w h o se face was dreadfully disfigured, a n d ,v u na muc h injured otherwise as to he scarcely abl e : e a t s in r o the witne-b° evening' stud--I went to the Flask, in Eh ure . square, last i and sat down in the taproom to,. about m i nu tes. On: heaving I wished of the prisoners night, sooner but had no One SO th an five goon. one shutff) , prisoner Gorman jumped over the table and GOURD OF COM ROA PLEAS, May 26. :,;(11 , . tore the LORD Calif Jurrws in Banco.) MARFIALT U. LEIFCHILD. Mr. JONES (with whom was Ur. Peacock) appeared to oppoai• a detaurrer to the judgment in this casco. The paint ff it ci ifj.tiit an estatt, o: the defetlant, with an undertakirg teat :an aharaci of ink sitouid be turnishrd, but that tot- ,nquiry Should not go further heck than a certain deed b 1843. After paying tie price the plaintiff disc,. vere i that the title was bid. An action was iirough ant a verdict entered tsgain.t: tom ; hut he sough( reparation on the growl of they., been a breach of the conditions of sale. It was argued by Mr. Peivock that there had ben an aft-rata deliver, d accordirg to the terms of the con. (talons, a-+d that it tOere ita4i been a breach at all o had tioi been properly alleged in the dvciara'i"n , ,a n '' that iNerefore the plaintiff was not entitled to any 'et. In -Upp ,, n " of his view o f t h e casi , h e c it e d Smart it. , waere a horse Lai been sold with a warranty. and this the planoiff alleged had invalidated the bar gAia. But on the tind it ap i ;eared that 11 , ) notice of ttasouniliiias had been given, as was, by law required, before twelve o'clock o the day after that on which th.• sale was t frecied. 'frie• allegation, therefore, was road-. tnisisaill , •, as the plea am iuit;ed to non assurupsit, the rule ought. to ne re!i.ed. Its answer to that i wa. held, that toe co: - :.tit.: ns of .sale hari created a coliatei at co.:tree', WA the case oE"ra,rk,r v Palmer" was cited to show that suen was the fact. In that case the plaintiff had agreed to set a qi:antity of i;ee, which, aecordini ' to t h e r ul es el t: e East India Company, mua t he so ld by sample. The rice alt-n produced, was unequal to tit, stopple, and tl,e ckfc.nlant en the trial pleaded 1.1.11 assume Sit. The Lam) CHIEF JUSTICE inquired whether that ap peared oo toe face r . •' the c .11trac, for he renit-,nbcrkd n cas reported by Catupbdi, in which en action had le-en b:',ught on a contract ter which there was a subsidiarJ, agrp.iut - H. But rent suilst‘h:iry agroewent had not ripped . .1 oo the ',el , : I); the deelarsvon, and the ilaintiti w s :;i . M' •to i!irst t , t! 'applicant in this case had rto ;nat. t.., vv,:iich the defendant ha': ;• ;.: ‘,..1 to iii). at,: if the abstract was to be .t o di it w.aild (.:;tttitute a - question of law on. tne J (Les alone would have to decide. If the d iv, d had not deiivered t! , e cL2ed of conveyance from. tiosanquet to Mr. Marfleet, which carried the estate in 1843 , he would base faded in that to fulfil his en but he bad•doee so, and had therefore pet• i..rated ad that eas required of him, and no rule nisi ought ta he granted. Thk: LORD - CHIEF BARON bald that he was of opinion the.: iltere must bo judgment fur the plaintiff, as the pl• a was a bad plea. The condition allegtd iu tars contract stated that .ho def.ndant had the power to a pod freehold title. The plea denied this, ant, stated that the il&entiant had only promised to give 1 , , e?rtain though not the aosiract of good title, bur if this d.•eial wa s t o be e ff ective at all it must be in prop-r and diner, terin=, and not circuitous and • argu mentative. The plea Waii therefore bad, tor no cases- , had be n cited, or couli. b-• cited, against this generai Tuts- id the Cuurts, and there oughF, coasequentiy, to be judgrnvit fur the plainiiff. 1 he .0, er Learned JudWs coinciding in this opinion. the ire;thet was ordered W he registered sceordingly. COURT 01. RE If iV, May 26. Vice Chaue(iltir Knight Bruce at ibz muming a, Chi( F Judge in Bankruptcy, but nothing of tqt.erets, Wu. tp•lore the Court. &3COIVIiittUES' COURT, May 26. (39fore Air. Sc.i.ondary POTTER.) L , : ., c ,g E V. CAUFER.--CURIouS CASE OF ALLEGED FAL , - sulcATlota oV VOUCHERS. T, :e t;) , sintiti" in this action i=, a brielitila':or and met chz,n*, and defends.nt a huilder, 8,,, e ., w , N e „,,,,„ , D eo l'orti. The action was brought to reeov,lr the sun, ot 111 54., the balaace of an account for goods sold uni, deliver. d. I ,a , d L 12. ik,to Cou:t a, • pi e t ,d The defender. reniamier. di dc h` 6 ns t ' i / '' v o i,, e i tor fi n - the plainii ff .eilled Thomp Ai r . swigrove, li 1 . r IT W- 0 ituted the ace, unt el ~, ~,e i i Atat , , , ionr, a ciek a I t' 11. :<,.,t, Ullll liut lht, kitaft„ ee ' -tr..' tr.( ,ce , tweel) ihe !):a l ,' r the d-fend wus due. ap pe ar,,(.l, ,(.1 a , cou nsel t, . Mr. 411rux.e. "" ~,t,xawied it:e wluebs as alit, Prilliic'd 4 *' k 3.1. i ."".", hook Ufa stun of 20/. as to ,in lary-tH 6 ' 'r dete" 4-1. " -. ~ swo re that he only free* e :' Tle witness clie:,incify retl'iv u k , n. on th e day in question • figures and hand. that although his Rigil - ttUre appwared on the book, --- the , . :11 h i s h an d. writing of the am oun t i n f u ll were n wriwriting.He generally s i gne d the boo k s. m . The figures , L.... , been had been attend from 10 Lc 20; the writing eau alter, d. - Mr. Mzutata. for the defen&mt, concluded the altera tion of tin to twenty had been occasioned by the wit ness pressing . for a lege suns on account. This he (the Le' .trued would prove iu.evijeuce. There was ": ritten part, and he begged to call the ~t%- „ mloo of the jury to the fact that sums of money were written a; lull lens* in cheques and on bilis kicked me dreadfully in the head and body. I contrived to get out and return , d with two policemen, when they h=at me again; And I crawled out, or I should .have been killed. Mr. Gregory. West, dairyman, York-street, Westmin ster, after dezcribing the first part of the assault, said— When the young man way down John Gorman and Gil bert kicked and junipcd Upon him. Mr. Brown, the landlord, immediately sent for the police, but before they came with his messenger the young man (Minter), who had contrived to get away from the prisoners, returned with two constables. On their entering the room the prisoner Coffer flew at one of them in the most savar4e manner, grasped him violently, and seizing a quart pot struck him on the ii,ad with it. A scene then ensued which beggars description. They were all in such fierce conflict that it is impossible to ray what occurred. The officers were so cut and wounded that it was impossible for them to take the prisoners, but a great force having at last arrived the prisoners were overpowered. Mr. Brown, the proprietor of the Flask, proved that finding the prisoner's party too strong fer the police, he immediately sent for more, and fifteen or sixteen came down. The heads of the policemen were dreadfully cut, and one, as he had since learned, was in a vary dangerous condition. Jimes Hubbard, 122 B, said —On arriving at the Fljtv.k with Minter, who had marks of having been much beaten. he pointed out Coffer as one of the men who had ilkreated him, when Coffer immediately jumped over the table and struck him very violently in my pre z:ence. I immcdistely laid hold of C3fter and told him I should take him to the station, when he replied, You can't ; and now I'll give it to you." Dennis Gorrean then came behind me with a quart pot and wounded me severely with it on the head. I turned round to defend myself in the best way I could, when Coffer jumped on the table and kicked me several times on the back part of my head, and I also saw him kick another constabl-, 156 B. Coffer also struck me several times with his fists, and Dennis Gorman struck me repeatedly with a quart pot, and I was also struck several blows with a poker or iron bar. The iron bar, which was square and of considerable thickness, with sharp edges, was produced, and was marked with blood. There were also several quart pots exhibited, battered into various forms by the violence with which they hail been used. Witness continued—John Gorman and Gilbert also attacked and beat me. Catherine Gorman came behind me and kicked me and tried to drag me away. My hands and arms are much hurt with the blows I re oeived. I drew my truncheon and used it. but only as att. as I could help. I was knocked and kit•lted out of the room with constable 156, and we were shut out. There were several others in defendants' party, but they made their escape out of the window. I went to Mr. Churchill. who dressed my wounds, and after that 1 went to the hospital. ... _ Isaac Trevitt, 156 B, who accompanied the last con stable to the house, confirmed his statement, and added —I saw Coff,r strike constable 122 B three or four blows. He then jumped upon the table and kicked me several times on the back of the head, and we had a tre mendous fight. Coffer and the Germans struck the other constable with quart pots, and we were obliged to leave the room. When more police arrived we burst in the door, and then another dreadful fight ensued, the prisoners and their party using the pots, poker, and everything that was moveable in the room against us, and we were obliged to use our truncheons. After some time we succeeded in taking the four de fendants into custody. They had been drinking, but were not drunk. William Dignan, 102 B, said—l went to the house with 148 B, and seeing the two constables there ill-used we went in. Coffer immediately struck me on the bare head with a quart pot and wounded me. Dennis Gor man also struck me with a quart put. I received blows from whers with quart pots. Mr. BRoDERIP (pointing to the battered quart pots produced)—Were the pots bent in that way by inflicting the wounds? Witness—Yes, and in striking the constable.' Michael Cary, 161 B, said—John Gorman hit me with a quart pot about the body; he also kicked me several times. Charles Chinn, 63 B, said—l saw Coffer strike 102, and John Gorman 151 B, with pots. He (Gorman). kicked me so severely that I was obliged to go to a doctor, and am now disabled. (Witness had his arm in a sling.) Ellen Gorman tried to rescue John Gorman from me anti incited the mob by using very violent language outside the house. Mr. Churchill, of Burton-street, Pimlico, proved hay ing attended to Hubbard's wound on the head, which was not dangerous. It must -have been a very heavy blow that he had received, and a quart put would cause such a wound. Mr. Taylor, an inspector of the B division, having put in a certificate from St. George's Hospital, stating that a constable was lying there with two scalp wounds, Mr. BnoneetP asked the prisoners what they had to say? when thermade the following remarks:— - John Gorman—Half they have said is not right. Dennis Germ an—l say just the same ; I never used a pot. Coffer-4t's no use talking. Gilbert—Those that hit me I hit. The women denied that they had taken any part in the affray. Mr, BRODEBlP—Pr:soners at the bar, it is my duty to remand you for re-exam:n.tion for the murderous attack upon the police until Saturday. I will take bail for the women; but the case is of by far too serious a nature for me to take bill for the male prix ;nets. The i t. in attendance were then bound over to prosecute the prisoners at the Central Criminal Court The object of the remand of the prisoners is, of course, to give the wk untied constable, now in St. Georgu'a Hos pita!, an opportunity of making his statement. WORSHIP S ['BEET. _David Hufton, a youts man described as a painter's colour makar, was charged with the following aggra vated outrage upon two young women, nam'd Sarah Kingston and Mary Anne Husband, the daughters of a plumber at Bethnal-green, and one of whom had ly-en confined ever since to her bed from the injuries she had sustained. The complainant, Sarah Kingston, a respectable• looking woman, stated that an intimacy had for some time subsisted between 114. sister Mary Anne Husband and the prisoner. and which the former had resolved to break off about two months since, but consented, at his earnest solicitation, to grant the prisoner a parting in• terview in the neighbourhood of her own residence. She accordingly left her mother's house for that purpose oa the evening of Saturday, the 15. h inst., but had not been absent more than twenty minutes. when witness, who was at horn:, heard loud screams of " Murder," in ner sister's voice, and on hastening to the spot from which they proceeded, found h. r si-ter struggling vio lently with the visoner. who was grasping her tightly by the throw. with both hands, and eeclaiming, " that he was determined to do for her if he died upon the gallows for it " Observing that her sister was per fecly black in the face, gaspirg her breath, and on the point of death from strangulation, she seized the pri soner by the collar and made him relax his hold, upon which the prisoner threatened that he would do for her also, and struck her two violent blows upon the face and neck, which caused her to stagger back, when he instantly renewed his attack upon her sister, whom he struck and kicked several times with all his force upon various parts of her person, until she fell to the ground, when he kicked her again savagely in the side. Her sister raised herself up, and attempted to run borne, but after tottering a few steps dropped in the street, exclaim ing, in terrible agony, that her leg was broken. A policeman came up, and advised her sister's removal to a surgeon's. but declined to take the prisoner into custody, a 3 he hod not witness• d the assault, although he ex pressed his w illifignesA to att, ml afterwards and give evi dence of w hat he had seen, if a warrant were taken out. Her sister was screaming in the greatest pain, unable to stand, and witness therefore ran for the assistance of her father, but on returning with him found that h-r sister had alri ally been lifted up by a gentliiman who hail been attracted by her cries, and who carried her ho .:e, whore medical assistance was instantly procured, but she hail been confinel ever since, and unable even to raise herself into a sitting posture. • Mr. ARNOLD inquired whether the policeman referred to was in attendance, but was answered in the negative, and one of the warrant-officer; explained that, from in, qtfrie , he had made, it did not appear that the constable had witnessed any part of the assault. Mr. Ilurtstone, the second clerk, having spoken to the severity of the contusions exhibited by the complainant Sarah 'Kingston upon giving her information for the warrant, a medical certificate was put in from Mr. Vale, a surgeon, of Waterloo town, stating that the young woman Mary Ann Husband. was suffering from severe injury to the left knee and other pins of her person, that there was great probability that she would never again recover the use of the j 'int. and that although he had been in constant attendance upon her from the 15th inst. to the present time ' the nature of the injurie s was such as to preclude her leaving h.r bed. When called Upon for his defence the prisoner, who displayed great emotion, stated that up oa meeting the 3 wing woman Mary Ann Husband at the time of appoint ment,.she exhibited sir+ a carelessness and iudiff.renee towards him, that he could not help upbraiding her with' her deception and cruelty ; upon which she tauntingly told him that she knew Wu re who would treat her much better than he did; and this observation s o worked upon his teeliegs that he perhlis might have struck her as. her sister had described, but he had cot the slightest re collection of having done so, he was so thoroughly dis tracted; he could declare positively, however, V - at he bad not kicked her, and that she had broken bier leg . lic . cidentallyherselt rom a fall she received whi'e turning away jeeringly from him on his remonstratinA'Nvith her, when he placed his hands upon hershollders at the back of her neck to endeavour to detain her: • Le entreated the magistrate to be merciful, as he was in very humble circumstances, and not in consaet employment. . Hr. ARNOLD said, that the charge ai,,far , as regarded the young woman who was absent..was of far too serious a nature to be summarily di4Oseil of, and he. should therefore confine himself for the present. to the outrage upon her sister, for which he should 'order hi:n to pay a penalty of 50-., or a month's ireprisrfithent in the House of Correction, and issue a warranetahe gwernor of the prison .or his turthl- detention o , to answer the , first =charge at tl,e sessions when the wuinan weGs , sufficiently I recovered to appear again s t him. .• ~ i • LAMBETH. r , ~ John Boyd, a powerful looking youpgi,man, in, the garb of a sailor, was placed at the bay on .floe charge of desperately psaulting and attempting; to . ;.yiolate the person of Elizabeth Clark. , • ._ l , , The prosecutrix, a very good-looking young woman, deposed that she was servant in the ftimily of Mr. Newton, a grocer, at Clapham, and haviri 'a' holiday ou the day before, she went to' Wattlsworth rair. 1- tbo l r a i v dr i ge n et g us,rn m b e u t tto w sh i t t oo h vi ' d s ind o . me friends she . itiAsPinduced to stAri there until a 'late hour, and than etot into a staam-boit in town, and upon• 1 oot li k h n e ow .go w t h ' ic o h u , t b a e t ing on a e s : t o r f ang th e e r , the opposite side of the river; 1 and passing over tir ke l y i h ag im e to the wtheaSvlllro oa d eysl p d h e a sie: met the primmer an asked common, :ite replied that he was going that Way, ard should be glad to accompany her there. She told him she did not require his company, and should be obliged to him merely to point out the way, when he repeated he was going to Clapham, and should accompany her there. He then walked with her some considerable dis tance, and took her into a field, which he said was the shortest way to Clapham; and when they had got some distance into it he threw her down on the ground, and used the most violent efforts to accomplish his object. She struggled with him as well as a s i he w w e( i i is he a:le t: a g rt e ii t cried out " Murder" as loud as the could, and he at l u e p n . gth s , h a e ft s e t r ill ab k u ep si t n c g al b l e in r g ve o r u y t f m or uc a h ss , 6 intunce, and a con stable coming up, she gave the prisoner into custody. From the description of the young woman the con duct of the prisoner appeared to have been of a brutal character. Charles Cattle, 323 V, said, that while on duty on that morning he heard loud screams and cries of " Mur der" in Ilentiman's•fields, South Lambeth, and while going quickly towards the place from w h ence t h ey pro ceeded, he saw the last witness running towards him He asked her what was the matter, but she was in exhausted a state that it was some moments before she could answer him. By this time the pri,oner came up to where they were. - and she gave him i n c h arge f or t h k assault described. The prisoner did not deny the charge, but, appealing to the prosecutrix, expre sse d a h o p e s h e would not give him into cu . st , .dy. fence, ri' h Ras e Pr fu i 'l' ' l e l y r committed whee o l 1 n f Q r d trial. g anything in de ELECTION MO V LAiRN TS. BATA. TUESDAYEVENING. — EIeetioneering has begun in this city in good earnest, and the friends of the pre sent Members, as well as those of Lord Ashley (to whom a requisition, inviting him to offer himself in the Conservative interest, was presented some time since) are taking active measures t o secure th e re turn of their respective candidates. Lord Duncan and Mr. Roebuck arrived here on Saturday evening. having (it is said) been specially urged to do so by their committees, and their address was forthwith i,sued and extensively circulated among the electoral body. Last night a meeting of the electors of the exten -ive ward of St. James, convened by the Central Committee of the Liberal Association, was held in the large room of the Lamb Inn. The chair was taken by Mr. Cbx, a circumstance which was regarded with much satisfaction by Mr. Roebuck's friends, inas • much as it had bef_n stated that that gentleman was one of a numerous party of the electors who had taken offence at some of the recent Parliamentary proceed ings of the Hon. and Learned Member, more parti cularly in reference to the subject of education. Mr. ROEBUCK delivered a lengthened address in explanation and vindication of his Parliamentary policy. de said he first sought their support as a Radical s and he had adhered to Radical princi ples ever since, and hoped to odintinue to possess their confidence. Lord DUNCAN also spoke at some length, and ap pealed to his past proceedings as an earnest of hi future conduct. Both Members were most cordially received, an resolutions in approbation of their conduct were passe , with acclamation. A very liumerous meeting of the friends of Lord Ashley was held to-day at the Assembly-rooms, and was attended by most of the influential Conserva tives of the city. Mr. W. Sutcliffe took the chair, and introduced Lord ASHLEY, who addressed the electors at con siderable length,' and touched upon the leading poli tical topics of the day. His Lordship touched upon the various matters of social reform, in which he has taken so deep an interest, and expressed himself to some extent in favour pf the policy of Lord John Russell, ivhom he believed to be a statesman of fine understanding, and of generous and patriotic mind. A vote of thanks to Lord Ashley was passed, and a canvass on his behalf will, it is understood, be imme diately commenced. BUCKIN The following address has been issued to the elec tors of the county of Buckingham by Mr. Disraeli:— " Gentlemen,—As one of our present. respected Mem bers does not intend to renew his offers of service at the general election, and as there is now no hope of obtain. ing a successor to him in that quarter which would re ceive the support ot all parties and interests, I beg to an • nounce my intenti on , on th e dissolution of the present Parliament, of soliciting your suffrages for the high hen •ur ot becoming one of your representatives. " It is now many years ago since, in your County Hall, I upheld the Cause of the Territorial Constitution of England as the best and surest foundation for popular rights and public liberty, imperial power and social hap piness. The maintenance of the agricultural industry of the country the necessary condition of the enjoyment of that Constitution; and I have, therefore, indepen dently of all other considerations, opposed, during the ten years in which I have had the honour ot sitting in Par iiament, every attempt which had a tendenry t. diminish the numbers and influence of. those classes which are directly dependent on the land. *e Influenced by this principle, I offered, during the recent assault on our protective system, a faithful, th ough fruitless, opposition to that project. What has since occurred has nut, in any degree, changed the conclusions at which I then arrived as to the scheme of the late • Administration. The temporary high price th it is sti • ululated by famine is not the agricultural prosperit.i ; which I wish to witness; while, in the full play of tin ' restricted importation, l already recognise a disturbing cause, which may shake our monetary system to its centre, and which nothing but the happy accident of cur domestic enterprise has prevented, I believe, from exer cising a very injurious effect on the condition of the working classes of Great Britain. " Notwithstanding this opinion, I am not, however. one of th,•se who would counsel, or who would abet, any attempt factiously and forcibly to repeal the measures •• 1846. The legislative sanction which they have obtaine , requires that they should receive an ample experiment ; and I sin persuaded that this test dew can satisfy di. elation either of their expediency or their want of fitne.is. If, however, as I hold the result of this great chang must be a reconstruction of our financial system, it will behove the various classes connected with the cultivation of the soil to be viglant, that their interests may IN adequately represented and fitly enforced at a crisis whet. their more compactly organized rivals will not be obit vious of their claims or ever scrupulous in urging them. "A domestic affliction precluded me from being pre sent during the recent debates on the subject of Nations? Education. It is but fair, therefore, that I should state, that had I been in my place I should have supported the measure of the Government. I should have done so upon two grounds ; firstly, that it was a considerable advance in a right direction ; and, secondly, because th,e tendency of that measure is, not by investing them with any exclusive privileges, but by securing them a fair occasion for their erertions, mainly to place the educe. don of the people in the hands of the clergy, whons I have ever wished to see in the vao of civilisation, and occupying their legitimate posts as guides and instruc tors of the people. "Although I have always been of opinion that our Constitution in Church and State has been a union far more benAcial to the State than to the Church, which. u:td,r all circumstances, tense exist and flourish from its inherent principle, I shall, at all times, heartily maintain that alliance, since it has become identified with the habits and best feelings of the people, and has, for a ion', serics of years, happily secure , t to us the bles,ings Ishii , of orthodoxy and of religious freedom. For these among other reason+, I thought it my duty to oppose, it ' 1815, the grant to the College of Maynooth, leading, a it inevitably and avowedly did, to the endowment of the priesthood of another Church. I see no reason to regry the opposition which I off:red to that measure, and hold it to be quite consistent with an earnest desire t secure to our Roman Catholic fellow-subjects the civ and political equality to which they are entitled. "In the great struggle between popular principle and liberal opinions which is the charac . eristic of on: age, I hope ever to be found on the side of the people. and of the institutions of England. It is our institutions that have made us tree, and can alone keep us so, by the bulwark which they offer to "the insidious encroachment, of a convenient, yet enervating, system of centralisation. which, if left unchecked, will prove fatal to the nations . character. Therefore, I have ever endeavoured to cherish our happy habit of self gov ernment, as sustained by a prudent distrib ut i on o f local authority. For them , reasons I am of Opinion that the right of supreme con trol, necessary to the due administration of the poor. law, sh •uld be exercised by the chief depositary of po w er ein evry county, an d that the supervision of our parishe.. sh.aild not be entrusted to strangers. "It is unnecessary for me to state I shall supp ort ali those measure-s the object of which is to elevate th• moral and social condition of the working classes, b) lease'ing their ho urs o f to il—by improving their mime, 01 health--and by culti va ti n g their intelligence. The: , are obje c t s w hi c h i t is not unpleas i ng for me to remelt supported by her, 'end eavou r ed. in common with some o f m y friend-, t. to adv,•n ee before they engaged the attention of Ge• vernment s , or were ... mental.; majorities. " . ' It is' with these views that I come forward to solicit yOur suffragt-s. triumphant rilrlia- I am deeply conscious how high is the object of my ambition. It the grea t e st honour that CO Englishman can receive from ihe hands of his fellow su!tieets; but it' the honour be great, I at least know hoe. to epereciate it. Amid the universal crash of parties, I advance to claim your confidence with none of the ci:sin• won places or fired tn. I am not tho organ of any sectio n, or non.; Si. O f any milividn a l. All that I can offer to you isOwh devotion o r suc h ener gies as I possess. AU that I aspire to i s t o serve you as b eco mes the represen tative of - a gr ea t, undivided, and historic county, that has achieved vast results for our popular liberty, our parliamentary reputation, arid our •natiolial greatness. `• n v I haveithe.h oo ur‘to remain, Gentlein n, n, . - .. May 22, 1847." •.. B. DISRAELI. " Bradenha "Tour faithful servant. Mr. '.Thomas Moore, after passing nearly a week with his old fri en d M r . C orry , re t u rned to his ow n cotta g e Wiltshire, on Wed nes d a y . During his st a y in Chid mornings he was ea r ly on tenham he tippeared to ))e, cons id er ing his years , in g ood health, Mail 'was in tol era bl e spirits. '' 'On two or three seemed aliiriy% sensitively a li ve to the influence of music ; and while listening to some of his own s weet airs, played by our exndlent band, was o b v i ous ly much affected. — Wien/tam Looker-on, the M on tpellier walk , and BANK RETURNS, (From the Lc g d on Gazette.) An Account, pursuant Victoria, sap. 'co the Act seventh and eighth of the Average Amount of Bank Notes, ol the several Banks of Issue in England and Wales, in Cireutation during the Week ending Satur day, the 15th day of May, 1847: Average PRIVATE BANKS. Amount. Abingdor. Bank, Abingdon—Koapp and C 0.., 24,820 LUde';er Bank, Andover—Heath and Co 14,640 ttls'nford Bank, Ashford—Jeminitt and Pomfret 9,429 Aylsha.n Bank, A 3 Ishain-13. and E. Copeman 5.635 Aylesbury Old Bank, Aylesbury—Rickford and Runt 41,919 Bahlock Bank and Beclock and Biggleswade , :aldock—Wells, Hogg, end Lindsell... 34,803 BAIn Ie Bank, Barnstaple-I):ake and Co :v .li 16,233 Basingstoke and Odihast Bank, Basingstoke— Cole, Seymour, and Co. tiedb ti Bank, Bedford—l'. Barnard i3edford and Bedfordshire Bank, Bedford— 'll apt, Halihead, and Co. ilewdley Bank, Bewdley—Nichols, Baker, and ;raue Bicester and Oxfordshire Bank and Oxford Bank, Bicester—Tubb, Wootten, and Co. t&rrinighain Bank, Birmingham—Attwoods, Sponer, and Co 23,572 ltireniegnam and Warwickshire Bank, Birming ham -Lewis, Moilliett, and CO .... 17.474 d Bank, Ille.ndtbrd—Bastard and Oak. 8.785 loston Bank, Boston—Gartit and Co 72.539 Boston Bank, Boston—Gee and Co 15,263 iiridgvAter Bank, Bridgwater—E. &J. Sealey 9.305 Bristol Bank, Bristol—Miles, Harford, and Co. 37,043 Brost.ae‘; and Bridgnorth, and Bridgnorth and Broseley Bank, Broseley—Messrs. Pritchard 24,266 Buckingham Bank, Buckingham—Bartlett, Parrett, and Co. 3nry and Suffolk Bank, Sudbury Bank, Market • Bank, Bury—Oakes, Bevan, and Co. l;ael ury Bank, Banbury—Gillett and Tawney. 41,579 iiiiinury, Old Bank, Banbury—Messrs. Cobb... 55,628 Bat- City Bank, Bath—Moger and Son . iied.ordshire Leighton Buzzard Bank, Leighton Buzzard—Bassett and Grant 35,818 oinghani Bank, Birmingham—Taylor and Lloyds iiradtia'd Old Bank, Bradford, Yorkshire—H and A. Harris itreeon Old Bank, Brecon—Wilkins an Co 62,827 , Irulport Bank, Bridport—S. and W. E. Gundry 22,346 'irighton Union Bank, Brighton—Hall, West, and Borrer Burlington and Driffield Bank, Burlington— Harding, Smith, and Co Bury St. Edmunds Bank, Bury St. Edmunds— .). Worlledge and Co. Bromagrove Bank and Stourbridge and Broms grove Bank, Bromagrove—Rufford, Biggs, and Co. :3anibridge Bank, Cambridge—Mortloek and Sons Cambridge and Cambridgeshire Bank, Cam bridge--Messrs. Forsters Canterbury Bank, Canterbury—Hammond and Co Carmarthen 'Bank, Carmarthen—Morris and Sons Chertsey Bank, Chertsey- 7 Messrs. La Costa Colchester Bank, Colch e ster—Round, Green, and Co. Colchester and Essex Bank, Witham and Essex Bank; and Hadleigh Bank, Suffolk, Colchester —Mills, Bawtree, and Co Cornish Bank, Truro—Tweedy and Co, Coventry Bank, Coventry—Little and Wood cock City Bank, Exeter—Milford and Co Craven Bank, SettleL-Birkbecks and Co. Christchurch Bank, Christchurch—Tice, Welsh, and Co Cardiff Bank, Cardiff—Towgood and Co Chepstow Old Bank, Chepstow Bank, Mon mouth Old Bank, Monmcuth Bank, Brecon Bank, and Ross and Herefordshire Bank, Chepstow—Bromage, Snead, and Co. Derby Bank, Derby—Messrs. Evans Derby Bank, Derby—Smith and Co. Derby Old Bank and Scarsdale and High Peak Bank, Derby—Crompton, Newton, and Co Devizes and Wiltshire Bank, Devizes—Hughes, Locke, and Co Dias Bank, Diss—Oakes, Fincham, and Co Doneaster Bank, Doncaster—Leatham, Tew, and Co. Doncaster Bank and Retford Bank, Doncaster— Cook .and Co. Dover Union Bank, Dover—Latham, and Co Darlington Bank, Durham Bank, and Stockton on-Tees Bank, Darlington—Backhouse, and Co Devonport Bank, Devonport—Hodge and Nor man 7,725 28,886 12,153 3,061 16,087 22,259 49,281 32,270 20,878 2 816 21,225 41.315 45,519 10,385 20,389 76,745 2,957 6,855 8,165 12,R91 38,241 26,362 19,002 10,565 13 ; 741 63,4 - 56 86,884 9,811 iorchester Old Bank and Dorsetshire Bank, Dorchester—Williams and Co. East Cornwall Bank, Liskeard—Robins, Foster, • and Co. East Riding Bank, Beverley—Bower, Hutton, and Co. • •••• Essex Batik and Bishops Stortford Bank, Chelmsford—Walford. and Co Exeter Bank, Exeter—Sanders and Co . Fakenham Bank, Fakenham—Gurneys, Birk beck, and Co. toarringdon Bank and Bank of Wantage, Far ringdon—Barties and Medley Farnham Bank, Farnham—Messrs. Knight Faversham Bank, Faversham—Hilton and Co Bank, Godalming—Mellersh and Keen (Irantham Bank, Grantham—Kewney and King nildford Bank, Guildford—Messrs. Haydon... !.Iranthism Bank, Grantham—Hardy and C 0.... Hastings Old Bank, Hastings—Smith, Wider, and Co. HeretOrd City and County Bank, Hereford — Matthews and Co. Hertfordshire Bank and Ware Bank, Ware— s. Adams and Co. [lull Bank and Kingston-upon-Hull Bank, Hull —Smith, Brothers, and Co., Huntingdon Town and County Bank, Hunting don—Rust and. Veasey larwich Bank, Harwich—Cox, Cobbold, and Co Hemel Ilempstead Bank, Hemel Hempstead— . Smith, and Whittingstall /ionitAin Bank, Ifoniton—Flood and Co. Hertford shire, Hitehen Bank, Hitchen—Sharples and Co. ller.d..ird, Ross, and Archenfield Bank, and Ross 11.1141 P rchenfield Baak, Hereford—Morgan, Hoskins, and Co Ipswich Bank, Ipswich—Bacon and Co. ipswich and Needham Market Bank, Suffolk, Hadleigh Bank, Manningtree and Mistley Bank, and Woodbridge Bank, Ipswich— Alexiv.ders an:l Co. Kentish Bank, Maidstone—Mercer, Randall, and Mercer Kiagton and Radnorshire Bank, Kington—J Davies and Co Knighton Bank, Knighton—J. Davies and Co. Kmaresborough Old Bank and Ripon Old Bank, Kinuesborough—Terry and Co Kendal Bank, Kendal—Wakefield, Crewdson, and Cc. Kettering Bank, Kettering-0 otch and Sons... Lane I.nd Staffordshire Bank, Lane End—C. llarv.:y and Son !.ends hank. Leeds—Beckett and Co fßeils Ilnion Batik, Leeds—W. Williams, Brown, 44,170 :05,287 50,583 53,360 34,129 21,608 7.837 14.13 r. 5,465 6,616 20,436 14.432 29;956 33,537 19,811 20,104 19,577 57,590 5,429 23,125 15,390 35,696 21.863 21,460 77,227 16,707 23,911 8,121 21,879 44,050 8,671 5,537 49,547 and Ci. beck and Stkafordshire Bank, and Leek and Congleton Bank,Leek—Fowler,Gaunt, and Co. F4uptester Bank, Leicester—Pagets and Kirby ewe:- Old Bank, Lewes—Molineux and Co.— Bank, LichfieldPahner and Green lancoal Bank, Lincoln—Smith land Co L...nlovery Bank and Llandilo Bank, Llando- N'e:y —David Jones and Co. ..ow , hborough Bank, Loughborough—Middle t paa and Cradock • tipuintrton Bank, Lymington—C. and S.' St Barbe !,ynn Regis and Lincolnshire Bank, Lynn Regis —Gurneys and Co. iiynn ltegis and Norfolk Bank, Lynn Regis— Massey and Co. '.laccleslield Bank, Macclegfi'eld=lirocklehurst and Co 12,374 lanningtree Bank,Manningtree=islunn and Co 6,387 N , larlborough- Bank,' Mtirlborotigh' and Wilts Old Bank, Marlborough Old 'Bank, Karl borough Old Bank and Hungerford Bank, and Hungerford Bank, Marlborough—Tanner and Pinckney 16,163 Marlborough and North Wiltshire New Bank;. Marlborough—Ward, Merriman, and Hillier 11,705 Aerionethshire Bank, Dolgelly—Jones and Willis ns \liners' Bank, Truro—Willyams and Co ... \loninouthshire Agricultural and Commercial Bank, Abergavenny—Baileys and C 0...,.,.,,, 27,678 ]Monmouth Old' Bank, Monmouth Bank, Brecon Bank, Chepstow B ink, Chepstow Old Bank, and Rosa and Herefordshire Bank, Monmouth —Brow-age and Snead. q o nnioathahire Newport Old Bank, Newport —W. Williams and Suns ..................... 8.112 ilewark Bank, Newark—Godfreys and Hutton 28,084 . ;ewark and Sleaford - Bank,'and Sleaford and Newark Bank, Newark—Haudley, Peacock, and Co 51.727 N - ewbury Batik, Newbury—Bunny and Slocock 34,721 !4ewtrarket Bank, Newmarket—Eaton, • Ham aloud. and Son *slerfolk and Suffolk Bank, Diss—Taylor and /yson Norwich Crown Bank, Norwich—Harveys and !la is ins Norwich and Norfolk Bank, Norwich—Gur neys end Cu 73,250 Nottingham and Nottingham,hire Bank, Not tingham—Hart,.Fellows, and Co 10,664 uiieaton Bank, Nuneaton—Craddcock and Co naval Bank, Plymouth—Harris, Mudge, and Co 23,355 Vew Sarum Bank, Sarum—Hetley, Everett, and Co • Nottine l iam Bank, Nottingham—Smith and Co 28,740 Oswestry Bank and Oswestry Old Bank, Oa wcatry—Croxan and Co 16,570 /Word 3ank, Oxford—J. and R. Morrell 13,455 !oxford :Nil Bank, Oxford—Robinson, Parsdns, 33 ,079 and Thompson... qld Bank Tonbridge, Tonbridge and Tonbridge Wells Cld Bank, Tunbridge and Tonbridge \Vklls and Sevenoaks Bank, Tonbridge— Deeohin Wad Sons ~• .................. ••••401.111- 9,238 35,389 446 29.370 39,697 18.733 95,589 33,670 6;50 4,230 5,074 Average Amount. `Oxfordshire Witney Bank Wit ne y—Willi a m s , Clinch, and Co 100,65 Peas .'s Old Bank, Hall, the Hull Old Bank and Beverley Bank, Hull—Pease and Co 47,530 Penzance Bank, Penzance—Batten and Co 10,904 Peterborough Bank and Oundle Bank, Peter borough—Messrs. Yorke Peterborough Bank, Peterborough—Simpson, White, hnd Simpson 11,355 Pr:abrokeshivt Bank, Haverfordtvest—J. and W. Walters "enzance Union Bank. Falmouth Bank, and Truro Bank, Penzance—Rickets, Enthoven and Co Reading Bank, Reading—aqmonas and Co 37,005 Reading Bank, Reading—Stephens,Blandy, and Co,. 40,758 Richmond Bank, Richmond—Stapleton and Co 6,642 Ringwood and Poole Bank, and Town and County of Poole Bank, Ringwood—Ledgard and Sons Rochdale Bank, .Rochdale—Clement, Royds, and Co Rochester, Chatham, and Stroud Bank, Roches ter—Day and Nicholson Romney and Hampshire Bank, Rornsey—Foot ner and Sun 5 033 9,084 Royston Bank, ttoyston—Fordham and Sons 14,658 Rugby Bank, Rugby—Butlin and Son l5 933 Rye Bank, Rye—Curteis, Pomfret, and Co 21,085 Reigate and Darking Bank, and Reigate. Croy don, and Darking Bank, Reigate—Nash and Co 12,872 Rims Old Bank, Herefordshire, Ross—Pritchard and Allan ay 4,244 Saffron Walden and North Essex Bank, Saffron Walden—Messrs. Gibson Salop Bank, Shrewsbury—Burton, Lloyd, and Co.. Scarbon nigh Oul Bank, 'icarborough—Woodall and Co Shrewsbury and Marne' Drayton Bank, Shrews bury—Adams, Ai - laths, and Co Shrewsbury Old Batik, and Shrewsbury and Ludlow Bank, Shrewsbury— Rocke, Eyt,ns, and Co. • • . 40,114 Sittingbourne and Milton Bank, Sittingbourne —Valiance and .Son Southampton Town and County Bank, South ampton —Maddiremi and Son Southwell Baiik, Skitithwell—W)lde and Co St. Alban's Batik. St. Alban's—J. S. Story Salisbury Bank, Salisbury—Messrs. Brodie Shaftesbury Bank, Shaftesbury— Brodie and King Southampton and Hampshire BAnk, Southamp ton—Atherly and Fail Stone Bank, Stone—W. Moore Stourbridge Ban,i, Stourbridge —ltuffi)rd, Wragg; and Co Stafford Old Bank, .`Trafford—Stevenson and Co Stamford and Itutlaml Bank, Stamford—Eaton, Cayley, and Co. Stourbridge Old Bank, Stourbridge—Bate and Robins Shrewsbury and Welshpool Bank, Shrewsbury —Beck, Downward, and Co. St. Alban's and Harts Bank, St. Alban's—Gib son and Stuart Taunton Bank, Taunton—Messrs. Badcock Tavistock Bank, Tavistock—Gill, Rundle, and 7,382 3,530 17,198 13,750 2,389 22,686 9,462 5,720 7,080 16,595 12,079 32,249 17,35 23,603 Co Thornbury Bank, Thornbury—llolph, Yates, and Parslow Tiverton and Devonshire Bank, Tiverton—Duns ford and Barne Thrapston and Kettering Bank, Northampton shire, Thrapston—Yorke and Eland Tring Bank and Chesham Bank, Tring—But cher and Son ToWcester .Old Bank, Towcester—J. and S Percival Union Bank, Cornwall, Helston—Vivian and Co 2,326 26,448 Uxbridge Old Bank, Uxbridge—Hull, Smith, and Co. Wallingford Bank, Wallingford—Wells and Co. Warwick and Warwickshire Batik, Warwick— Kelynge, Greenway, , amd Co. Wellington Somerset Bank, Wellington—Fox, Br,,thers West Riding Bank, Wakefield, and Pontefract Bank, Wa.z.efield—Lcathanu, Tew, and Co Whitby Old Bank, Whitby—Simpson, Chap man, and Co Winchester, Alresford, and Alton Bank, Win chester—Bulpett and Co. Winchester and Hampshire 13aiik i Winchester —Wickham and Co ,Weymouth Old Bank and Dorchester Bank, -; Weymouth—Elliott and Pearse Witkes worth and Ashhourne Derbyshire Bank, Wirkesw9rth—Arkwright and Co. Wistitl'eli and Lincolnshire Bank, Wisbech— Gurney and Co. . . Wivelisciorne Bank; Wiveliscombe—P. and W Hancock Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhampton—Good ricke and Holyoake. Worcester Bank, Worcester—Farley, Lavender, and Co. Worcester Old Bank and Tewkesbury Old Bank, Worcester—Berwick, Lechmere. and Co Worcestershire Bank, Kidderminster—Farley and Turner Whitby Bank, Whitby---Frankland and Wil kinson Walsall Old Bank, Walsall—Charles Foster and 12,607 9,776 10,664 10,959 12,8 10,580 15,218 23,968 11,051 28,155 3,248 43,462 14.610 21,246 4,85 16,68 35,547 57,260 7,040 10,250 13,678 82,588 12.107 Sons .. Warminster and Wiltshire Bank, Warminster— Everett and Co. Wrexham Bank, Wrexham—.J. and S. Kenrick Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhanipion— Messrs. Fryer Yarmouth and Sutlblk Bank, and Halesworth and Suffolk Bank, Yarmouth—Gurney, Birkbelk, and Co. Yarmouth, Norfolk. and Suffolk Bank, Urrat Yarmouth—Sir E. K. Lacon, Bart., and Co Yeovil Old Bank, Yeovil—E. and J. Batten York Bank. York—Swann, Clough. and Co JOINT-STOCK BANKS. Bank of Westmoreland, Kendal ... Barnsley Banking Company, Barnsley BradfOrd Banking Company, Bradford Bihton lli:;trict Banking Company, Wolver hampton Bank of Whibehavcn, Whitehaven Bradford Commercial Banking Company, Brad ford ........... Burton, Ust,,xeter, and Staffordshire Union Banking Coonpany, Burton-upon-Trent Chesterfiehi and North Derbyshire Banking Company, Chesterfield .. 9,489 Cumberlanri ilnion Banking Company, Work ington Cheltenham and Gloucestershire Banking Com pany, Cheltenham Coventry and Warwickshire Banking Company, Coventry Coventry tiftion Banking Company, Coventry 15.825 County of Gloucester Banking Company, Chel tenham Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Company Carlisle Carl:sle City and District Bank, Carlisle 19,096 Dudley and West Bromwich !latticing Company, Dudley 37,657 Derby and Derbyshire Banking Company, Derby 18,992 Darlington District J‘iiiit-Stock Banking Com pany, Darlingt~ l l East of England Bank, Norwich Gloucestershire Banking Company, Gloucester. 149,243 Halifax Joint-Stuck Bank, Halifax Huddersfield Banking Company, Huddersfield 34,00 Hull Banking Company, Hull 29.288 Halifax Commercial Banking Company, Halifax 13,26 , 1 Halifax and Huddersfield Union Banking Com pany, Halifax 39,972 Helston Banking Company, Helston 1.20:i Herefordshire Banking Company, Hereford 22,495 Knaresborough and Claro Banking Company, Knaresborough • -4 27,986 19;725 21,596 2,438 11,30, 50,975 11,185 7,956 45,636 10,925 8,859 49 091 9.317 31,032 19,009 128,423 Kingsbrid4e Joint-Stock Bank, Kingsbridget..... 3,689 Lancaster Banking Company, Lancaster 66,517 Lee's Banking Company, Leeds • 21.743 Leicestershire Banking Company, Leicester 84.951 Lincoln an& Lindsey Banking CiSsii,ltny; Lincoln 54,867 Leamingto - I.Priors and Warwickshire Banking Company, Leamington Priors Leeds and West Riding Banking Company, Leeds Leeds Commercial Bankin g Company, Leeds 295 Ludlow anti renbury Bank, Luiirow 9,520 Moore and Robinson's Nottinghamshire Bank ing Company, Nottingham 29,318 Nottinghatii and Nottinghamshire Banking Company, Nottingham Newcastle. Shields. and Sunderland Union Joint- . Stock Banking Company, Newcastle 81,914 National Provincial B ank of England, Binning !) fiii), , i. Heath-WHO, 112, LAishopsgate-street, London ; ..... ~. ... • ... .. . . ......................... 435,624 North Wilt: - • 13 ank in g Company, Melksham 57.'255 Northamptemshire U nion Bank, Northampton 79,645 NorthamptonThire Banking Company . , North ampton- -. ......... p N a o r r e t s la , s an L d e ;S c . iiii h r . 4; l )T i . 7l . e ie . s. Banking Lei , ne ster ..... ..• Saddleworth Banking Company, Saddleworthw . #3,490 Sheffield Bankii:;.?, Company, Sheffield t - ".. 34,765 4tamford, Spalding, and Stamfordßoston ri ß st a o n i k s b o ig m 4 e 3 r o s m : ... pany, Staiord ... ................. : ....... . .......... 53,315 St s u li ck ir e e Y 'saHnkan, ladund*SoummePrasieTsiiißre Banlc', Lang. • port ............................ ...... .................. 328,484 Shropshire Banking Company, Shiffnall ... ..... 46,953 Stourbridge and Kidderminster Banking Com pany, Stourbridge Sheffield and 1141lamshire Banking Company, 2 5 3. 5 : 0 2 0 8 9 9 ShSeffilleeffildeladnd.R•-0t.h.e.r.h..a.m.....J.0.1n't.: ............. Banking "-....... Company, Sheilio!cl Swaledale and Wenile y dale Banki ng Company, 51,497 Richmond.. S toc kton and D Banking County 850,898 lg Com pany, Stockton Storey and Thomas's Banking C ompany, 9,304 855 Shaftesbury Sheffield and Retferd Bank, Sheffield „ N S V u o ff l o v l e k rh ß at n p k t i o li n . a. idlpswich at . ;l; i Banking CI : •-• u ... n .. k . ) . n . ... /away; Wolverhampton 'Wakefield 13,685 g i t e o Y ek Banking Company, w W h ak it e e fi h. e a l v cl e rd ju ß i a n r c ia . W \ a V rw hi i te ck h a av n e d n Letevui a r_gtou Banking ' Company, 3314;75 W L es e t am oi i . ng t t n e g n iane and South Wales District Bank. Brutal . „... 79,897 25,276 57,959 A vent ,re A -"mint Wilts and Dorset Banking Company, Salisbury 72,878 West Riding Union Banking Company, Hud dersfield Whitchurch and Ellesmere Banking Company, Whitchurch Worcester City and County Banking Company, Worcester York Union Banking Company, York 69,451 York City and County Banking Company, York 92,106 Yorkshire Banking Con:Tiny, Leeds P. DEANS, Registrar of Bank Returns. Stamps and Taxes. May 22, 1847. MARKET — NEWS. ( YESTERDAY.) CORN EZCBANGZ. During the pre sent week the arrivals of English Wheat for our walk+ t have been to a tnir'extent. To-day the show of samples of that grain was by no means large ; yet, owing to the prevailing fine weather, the demand for all descriptions was in a very sluggish state, and Mon day's reduced figures were with difficulty supported• Upwards of 8,000 quarters of foreign Wheat have come to hand since Saturday evening. As usual, large parcels were pressing for sale, the trade was heavy, at a decline of fully is per quarter. The show of Barley well malt rate, while the trade was heavy, at barely late rates. Esceettiogly little business was passing in Malt, the value of which grain had a downward tendency. Oath Beans, Peas, Indian Corn, and Flour, might have been purchased on somewhat easier terms. - En:nab ...... Irish. • • •• .• •• Foreign ...... ARRITALX. Wheat. Ka el. 2,14 ,, qrs. 1.1,0 qrs. Oats I Flonr. 320 qrs.) 4,550 at/ 8,700 610 11,560 3,g70 Malt. 4.620 an. WIIXTECALAPS.L. A fair averse supply o f .444 on sale here; generally speaking, th e de tna nd was in a sluggish at barely stationary prices. B ee f, trom 33 6d to 43 6d& Mutton, 4s 4d to 5,6 d; L am b, 6 s to 6s 10 d; Veal, 4s 6 I to 5s 6d; and Po r k, 4s 4d t o 5s 4d per Bibs , b y the carcase. state. CAUTION TO EMIGRANTS DISMISSAL OF A LIVERPOOL PASSENGER AGENT. On Friday Patrick Gornley was summoned before Mr. Rushton, and Sir Joshua Walmsley, to answer 6 com plaint preferred against him of having by means of pretences induced Daniel Harrigan to take a passage t tr himself, his wife, an d two ot h er females to St. John' s, Newfoundland, instead of to St. John's, New Brunswick. Daniel Harrigan, a decent leeking Irishman, deposed that he arrived here on the 11th of last month, frees t b li i. e ok e e lfi r c i e n of M. o G o o l. rnl T ey h , ere wh w o as wa n s o Cork, and that in t wo d a y s atter hi s arr i va l be went to at th e time. He asked Gornley if h e h a d a s hi p f or St. John''aonnecewnistehdhpiamssenger New Brunswick, and he replied that he had. He thee asked the name of the vessel, and he replied the soh.. Gornley asked whether he was going to pay the passage money, upon which complainant replied that his wif e who two other women, ho were going to America wi t h him, were in town, and that he must acquaint them be fore he entered into any agreement. He then sake° , whether he could see the ship, to which he replied, eet,t, that she was at the Brun s wick do c k, a nd that if ' any time he would be very apt to miss his passage in her, for that in all probability, her several berths would be engaged before be came back. This cmiversation took place about eight o'clock in the morning of the 13th ultp and Gornley said she was going to sea at four o c loclf that afternoon. Con.plainant told him that he sh ould be back in a very short ti m e, so s o on as he should h ave gone and acquainted his wif e . H e then went to hi a wife, and returned to Gornley between nine and ten o'clock the same morning. His wife accompanied him ; and she having also ascertained that the ship was going to St* John's, New Brunswi c k, an d th a t s he would sail that day, paid 8L passage money for herself and her husband, Gornley, who did not give any certificate at the time, told the wife to go at once and see the two other swot* * * of her party ; and the wife having gone and brought one of the girls with her, that girl paid him 81. more for bar cwn passage and the passage of her female coin:Main to St. John's, New Brunswick. He then wrote and handed them a certificate, which Harrigan read, and t ° , his surprise he discovered that, instead of St. John New Brunswick, it mentioned that they were to be Mhe,l_ l , to St. John's, Newfoundland. He immediately .WI" Gornley that Newfoundland was a country to which they had no desire of p oceeding ; but Gornley began to laugh at him, a nd saicithat he could not go to a bett e r place than Newfoundland ; that, after discharging then the Sophia would go on as f a r as Pultwash, that t hin e! would be within thirty six hours' sail of St. Johtes•l ge : Bru ve nswick. and that he should be able to get t here ' . . ' cheaply. Finding that o n the day he paid the m e the ve s sel had sailed out of 'dock that very nwrning'l"6Z offered Gornley tiOs. if he would give back the _ _ which had been paid him, and permit him to go vipers round himself deceived. The vessel having sat he liked. But Gornley refused this o ff er, and sailed. as s ge b n e withthhaitrtsitclii:nteurettha than l s a e n h m accident oney a a n n d passage altoge t h er, and being unable to see Gornley, aliheugh he c a l led 11.. Lai board, and set sail or. the 18th ult When she had , hi. office several times, he and the three females wens wa s d r iven been out a few day. she was dismast-d. and into Belfast, and there, when all his money had been turned back, and twi out, and moat of hi, clothes destroyed on board, he was obliged to leave the vessel and come over to LlYer• p0, , 1. tti obtain justice. Its moss-examination by Mr. Owen, he admitted that the captain had given him lib. of biscuit e-day, but he added that it was very bad biscuit. He also admitted that hims, if and his wife had received the sum of 3/. at Belfast, from some parties belonging to the vessel. Lieutenant Hodder, It. N.., the government emigration agent at Liverpool. deposed that prsvious to the original sailing of the Sophia a number of passengers having dis covered the deception which had been practised upon them, came to his office to complain. Their complaint' was that they had taken a passage for St. John's, New Brunswick, and that it turned out they had shipped for St. John's Newfoundland. He accordingly wrcte a note to Gortiley, desiring nireurdt.r the cir-umstances to re turn the money, and telling him that otherwise no pains should he spared to punish him. Gormley came to the office, was very s•rongly remonstrated with for his prow' tices, and returned the money in that case to the parties. He (the lieutenant) had the other passengers duly in' formed of the destination of the vessel, and the conse quence was that when they learned they were going to Newfoundland instead of New Brunswick, they came 0 him in lots with their complaints. The reason, however, that he could not interere was, because the vessel bad cleared the Cust.m-house with 29 passengers-30 pa' Jengera being the lowest number of which the law takeS cognizance. On reaching &bast, however, it was found that instead of 30 passengers being on board, in reality there were 50. Mr. John S. de Wolff, the owner of the Sophia,"stated that he was not aware of the precise number of passer grrs she had on board, but all he had got paid for were 251 adults. He was, however, aware of this, that 10 Belfast he was mulcted in a penalty under the Act, for the captain having had more passengers on board than the ship bad cleared with. lie had received SU in all for the passen , ers, and w here the vessel was going was 150 or 200 miles from St. John's, New Brunswick. Mr. ltushton having recapitulated the facts of the carte and said an alteration was about to be made in the law, which would bring all vessels, no matter what the num ber of the passengers might be, under the cognizance of Lieut. Hodtter and the authorities, proceeded to observe upon the fact that in this case the total number of fifty passengersrnis was nothad by on isomeonegrn great shipped. e n t ty preventing n Ti i h n e e co pa t a lii, but the vessel had been clearegdnswearirtohifvetwii sengers, for the obvious purpose to co a uld la source of the fraud from bei was altoge her a most painful one. More a pipseligers themselves uoii,g cons , quences than* those likely to betel c t a he acni peor n h d ar w di h y ere be the e ir on.c frie -v n i t for, instead of and relatives were waiting to receive them, they were about to be sent to another country - where they had neither ft iends nor relatives, and thus pauperism would be enlatied upon them, and it might be death it.. Gornley, he said, must pay a penalty of 101.. fore . his licence, and never again practice as a passenger broker in Liverpool ; and he trusted that this would be .a warning to persons acting in Gornley's situation, and there were very few such he was happy to believe ; and also 'a warning to the emigrants, whenever, the appear ance even of fraud was attempted, to go to Lieutenant Hodder or the magtstrutv, and they would (Main in.. stunt redress. The case was of the utmost importances inure points of view than one ; for no fewer than 75,000 emigrants had sailed from Liverpool in the pre" sent year. . • . The judgment seemed to give the greatest sat's t'action to a court densely crowded at the time with mai. ..-larrigan and his friends. — Liverpo ol Jour na l. grants and parties interested in the affecting_tale told by MO R XING, MAY 27, 1847• B.IIITHB, On the 22d inst., at Warwick, the lady of the Rev. T. Parry, Rector of Sedgehrook, of a son. On,the 17th Lust., at Cublentz, on the Rhine, the lady of A. Jordan, Esq., of a son. On the 19th inst., at Armitage Lodge, Staffordshire, the lady of Thomas John Birch, Esq., of a daughter. On the 21st inst., at Paris, Madame E. Todros, of a daughter. 7 - place, Mrs. John Gosnent On the 21st inst., at Highbu of a daughter. On the 23d inst., the lady of Samuel Wreford, Esq., of Oxford-square, Hyde-park, of a son. On the 23d inst., in Bryanstone-street, Portman-equate. the lady of G. R. Griffiths, Esq., of a son. On the 23d inst., at Camden-road Villas, Camden-toin l o the wife of Frederick Perigal, Esq., of a daughter. On the 23d inst, Mrs. S. J. Joseph, of Montague-placer Russell-square, of a daughter. On the 24th inst., at Southwick-crescent, the wife of James Stewart, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, of a daughter. On the 24th inst., at Eaton-place, Belgrave-square , the lady of John Farquhar Fraser, Esq., of a daughter. MARRIED. On the 20th inst., at St ra thti e ldsaye Church, Jewph S. Beauchamp, Esq., to Louisa, third daughter of G. E. Beau- champ, Esq., of the Priory, near Reading. On the 22d inst., at St. John's, Oxford-square, the Es,:ff Adolphus Hamilt o n, M.A., Curate of Christ Church, el-, 3larylebone, to Henrietta Charlotte, youngest daughter o f the late Admiral Sir Benjamin Hallowell Carew, G.C.8., of BeddingtonLpark, Surrey. DIED. On the 15th inst., at Hartford Hall, Cheshire, the Ile., Thomas Ainsworth. Oa the 16th inst., Mr. A. J. Bone, of Pall-mall, aged 31. On the 21st inst., at Bath, Lieutenant-General Sir Thouust Pearson, K.C.11., Colonel of the 85th Regiment of Foot. On the 21st inst., at Broadleaze, near Devizes, Mary, thy wife of the Rev. William Maskell. On the 21st inst., at Belair, near Plymouth, Captain W. P. Hamilton, R.N., aged 46. On the 22d inst., Maria, second daughter of Mr. B. S. Bury, of B )xmoor, Herts, aged 33. On the 22d inst., at Great Missenden, Bucks, the Rev. B• Marks, aged 69. -- London: Printed and Published by 1101W0 YOUNG, of NS. 1114 Strand, PrLnter, at Thu Ottlee, N 0.112, Strand. in the itaalsaa of the UM. is the County et Middleton, TittUiday, 27. £147. ..-....-..-'..-....."..'..- _~