The Liverpool Standard and General Commercial Advertiser. — Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1833-07-12 00:00:00

PACKING ESTABLISHMENT, 52, HANOVER-STREET, ()N the above Premises, Manufactured Goods are made up and Packed (by Hydraulic power) witlVare and despatch. There is constantly on hand a large quantity of Hay and Straw ready packed for exportation. DESIRABLE LODGINGS ' (NNE or Two Gentlemen may have separa Apartments, or ki a small Family would be received r the Season, in a delightful situation, near Hamilton-square, irkenhead.—Apply at the Standard Office. ONE or Two GENTLEMEN can be aceo Odate d w ith APARTMENTS in a respectable Fa . 1 in Park-street, Toxteth-park, where there are no other Lo ers. Terms, 108. each per week.—Apply at the Standard-Otlice. he MH. MONCAS f e o s a his F c r L ie co n c ds ic a n i‘ d iA t Z3 P F u A b c lic 'lllltE, in all its branches, is carried on at t e MANUFACTORY, 90, Ric umoNo, SAINT ANNE'S, a 1' 1 below EVERTON cREscENT, where he respectfully solicits continuance of their future orders. He is aware that the situation is inconvenient to a part of his connexion, but he ventures to assure his Friends generally, that it is attended with most decided and important facilities for the making of first-rate TIME - KEEPERS and WATCHES, on terms and in a style more than amply sufficient to counterbalance that inconveniance. Watches and Clocks of every description carefully repaired, and Clocks regulated and wound up weekly at a moderate an nual charge. Rielsinond, St. Anne's, July 11, 18.33. Zo be Diopoodi of. DESIRABLE INVESTMENT. MO be DISPOSED OF, an old - esta b l i s hed S T WORKS, situated in the neighbourhood of Sandba , Cheshire. In consequence of the death of the Managi Partner, the above Works are now to be disposed of: They possess great advantages for the INLAND TRADE, are situated on the banks of the Trent and Mersey Canal, in the vicinity of extensive Collieries, and are only 16 miles from An derton, where the Salt is shipped for Liverpool. The Works are supplied with Brine of the first quality on the spot, and there are six pans of considerable dimensions. For further information apply (if by letter, post-paid,) to Mr. J. G. CARTER, 38, Great George-street, Liverpool; or to Messrs itxv.it and SON, Bennett's-hill, Birmingham. WOOLFIELD'S BAZAAR, Nos. 71 and 72, CHURCH-STREET, LIVERPOOL, adjoining the Postoffice, Emporium for superior LONDON JEWELLERY, Superb BRONZES, CLOCKS, CHIMNEY ORNAMENTS LAMPS, C HANDELIERS, And all the various FANCY MANUFACTURES Of ENGLAND, FRANCE, GERMANY, & Manufactory for WORK-BOXES, WRITI -DESKS, and DRESSING-CASES. yISITORS and STRANGERS in • erpool, and the Public in general, are respectfulty vited to visit this UNIQUE ESTABLISHMENT, whether as Purchasers or Parties in search of amusement, the whole of the Stock (cer tainly one of the largest and most varied in England) being conveniently arranged for inspection, and the price marked on each Article, from which no deductions are made, nor credit given, this system enabling the Proprietor to offer his Goods lower than any other. WRITING—DESKS, DRESSING—CASES, WORK BOXES, and JEWEL-CASES, made to Order, Repaired, or Refitted. ENGLISH and F RENcti TABLE and SIDEBOARD LAMPS, SUSPENDING DITTO, and CHANDELIERS, in great va riety, from 20s. to EZ each. Ad elegant Assortment of FRENCH CLOCKS, iu Gilt, BRONZE, and oa-moix, of the most splendid and modern de signs, from £5 to 100 guineas each. A few superb antique DITTO, of the tune of LOUIS XIV. A large Assortment of MUSICAL SNUFF-BOXES, di rect from Geneva. from 18s. to 20 guineas each. A superb variety of PARIS BRONZES, of the highest finish, comprising Inkstands, Candelabras, Candlesticks, &c., with au immense choice of other elegant Chimney Ornaments, including a recent importation from Leghom, of a most tasteful variety of ITALIAN ALABASTERS ; also, a fine Collection of TABLES, in Marble and Scagliola Work. RODGERS and Sox's Warranted RAZORS, SCISSORS, PENKNIVES, &c. in great variety. PAPIER MACHE GOODS, of the most superb workman ship, viz., Tables, Jars, Vases, Pole Screens, Hand Screens, Card Racks, Card Boxes, Quadrille Pools, Tea Trays, Waiters, Plates, &c. Any of these Articles may also be had in Plain Colours for Ladies to finish. Ne Plus Ultra WRITING DESKS, with Patent Lock, Ink stand, and Secret Drawers, 13s. tid. each, Paper-cases, Folios, Carpet-bags, &c. Gentlemen's TRAVELLING DRESSING-CASES and POUCHES, in Russia and Morocco Leather, in almost endless variety; prices, all complete, with Instruments and Rodgers and Son's Cutlery, from 7s. to 60 guineas; the small MILIfA RY DRESSING-CASE, weighing only 6 ounces, containing every requisite, and of extra quality, only 265. TORTOISESH ELL COMBS and BRUSHES, of all kinds, remarkably cheap. Genuine EAU DE COLOGNE, at Ils., 16s. 6d., and 195.6 d. per Box of Six Bottles. The 19s. 6d. warranted Farinas, and imported direct from Cologne. All sizes of EMPTY BOXES, in Cdar, Mahogany, and Rosewood. Every ARTICLE for fitting up Dressing-cases, Work-boxes, Writing-desks, and Scent-cases. An immense choice of LADIES' RETICULES and PURSES, Berlin NECK-CHAINS, CROSSES, BRACE LETS, and EAR-RINGS. A large Assortment of Ladies' SATIN SHOES, best make, ss. 6d. per pair, all colours. The JEWELLERY is of the best LONDON MANUFAC TURE, and, it being altogether a NEW STOCK, its style, price, and quality cannot fail to insure the Bazaar a continuance of the favoured and increasing patronage of the Public, and as it regards all the other divisions of the Stock, T. W. pledges him self to use every economy in affixing his Prices. T. W. also begs to state, that he does not, directly or indi rectly, suply any other Bazaar or Shop in Liverpool. Orders from Shops in the Country and for Export jexecuted at the Manufacturers' Prices. 3300t10 13ublistO. COTTON WOOL. , This day is published, price ss. ed. A jirei tr SCALE, displaying at a view the Im o t, Export , Home Consumption, and Stock of Great ritain, with the Li verpool Import, and extreme Prices Uplands, during the last Twenty-one Years. Laid down from the most authentic Mercantile Statements, by D. W. SEAGER. May be had of Messrs. G. and J. Robinson, and all the Booksellers. Just pubtiihed, in Leo large Volumes, Octavo, Price £ 1 10 s., HISTORY of the FRENCH REVOLUTION; from the Assembly of the Notables, in 1789, to the establishment of the Directory in 1795. By ARCHICALD ALISON, F.R.S.E., Advocate. " These volumes narrate the event ith an animation per fectly consistent with simplicity. Co e what will, Mr. Alison has rear&ii a noble beacon. Faithful and forcible, he shows us the evils of weak submission in the government, and of arrogant demand in the people. To all he gives the mighty moral of a Revolution. That his history is told with ease and eloquence, is its humblest praise."—Blackwood's Magazine. " This is the best History of the French Revolution in the English language."—Spectator. " The opening of the splendid and terrific drama, to the fall of the curtain, is now laid before us by a master hand, and a work added to our standard English literature, which deserves tube placed beside our most esteemed books of history."— Albion: "Mr. Alison, with all his Toryism, is a thousand times more honest an historian than Mr. Hume. Party spirit is not unduly prominent in these volumes."—Stot• " The work is so valuable for the comprehensiveness of its details, and the great impartiality of its facts, and the eloquence that prevails through its pages, that we do not anticipate for it more than it merits when .we express our belief that it will make its way into every well-furnished library."—Atlas. " This is one of the most able historical works that has ever issued from the press of this country. We rejoice that a sub ject so splendid in itself, replete with such great and heroic actions, is at length in the hands of one so well qualified to do justice to so mighty a theme."—Brighton Gazette. Printed for William Blackwood, Edinburgh: and T. Cadell, Strand, London. This day- is published, In Two large Volumes, Bvo., price L. 1, Ns. with Fifteen Maps, lip HE Second Edition, with numerous additions, of BRITISH JL AMERICA, by JOHN M‘ColEoon, Esq. This work contains full and accurate sketches of the climate, soil, natural productions, agriculture, trade, heries, &c. of the Canadas, Nova Scotia, New Bruns i , Prince Edward Island, Cape Breton, Newfoundland, . &c. with full and practical information to emigrants. This edition contains much additional information ; and the whole accounts have been brought down to the latest period. "Considering the critical moment at which the present work has come forth; considering also the fulness and remarkable accuracy of the information which it offers to our governors at home, we believe that few men in this generation will prove greater benefactors to our vast establishment of North American colonies than John M‘Gregor."—Blackwood's Magazine. "We have nothing to add but our hearty approbation of these volumes."—Literary Gazette. " Mr. M`Gregor's work deserves the title of a Picture of America. It is lively, full of detail," &c.—Spectator. "We particularly recommend all persons, directly or indi rectly connected with emigration, to read the last chapter of the first volume."—Atlas. _ . " We conceive that nothing more can be added to the statis tical condition of British America than Mr. M‘Gregor has given."—Quarterly Journal of Agriculture. "Mr. M'Greger has written a very pleasing, as well as a highly valuable book."—Sun. " It contains much valuable, entertaining, and useful infor mation."—Morning Post. "The very book which we have long wished to see ; a book of facts, not of words."—Edinburgh Observer. "This is a valuable publication ; the production of a gentle man of practical knowledge and observation, who lived long in the land, of which he writes."—Athempum._ Printed for WILLIAM BLACKWOOD, Edinburgh; and T. CADELL, Strand, London. NEW BOOKS of the present season, published by Mr. 1.11 MURRAY, Albemarle-street, London. I. With Thirty-five splendid Landscapes, drawn by Turner and Stanfield, and engraved by W. and E. Finden, illustrative of the Scenery of Lord Byron's Life a 'Works, in 17 vols., price £4 ss. neatly bound in cloth YRON'S LIFE and WORKS COMPLETE. 11. MAXIMS and HINTS f ANGLING and CHESS, and MISERIES of FISHNG. With Twelve Plates, Wood cuts, &e., a pocket volume, elegantly bound in green, foolscap Bvo. 75. 6d. 111. The THIRD VOLUME of PRINCIPLES of GEOLO GY. By Professor LYELL, F.R.S. With very numerous Illustrations, Bvo, 20s. IV. The PHILOSOPHY of the MORAL FEELINGS. — By JOHN ABERCROMBIE, M.D. F.R.S.E. Bvo. 6s. 6d. V. PROCEEDINGS of the BRITISH ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of SCIENCE, at York, in the year 1831, and at Oxford in 1832. Illustrated with a coloured Geo logical Section of the Continent of Europe, from Caithness to Venice. In 1 vol. Bvo. 18s. VI. REJECTED ADDRESSES. The Eighteenth Edition. With an ORIGINAL PREFACE, and NOTES by the Au thors. Portrait by Harlow, and W oo d- cuts b y C ru i kshank, foolscap 8v0..65. bd. VII. A BACKWOODSMAN'S SKETCHES of UPPER CANADA, for the USE of EMIGRANTS. Third Edition.— % Foolscap Bvo. Is. 6d. The QUARTERLY REVIEW, No. XCVIII, will be pub lished on Wednesday, July 10. EXTRA ACCOMMODATION. "BANG-UP," LIVERPOOL AND CHELTENHAM DAY COACH. TN compliance with the numerous and repeated applications for a conveyance on Sundays upon the above line of road, the Proprietors of the BANG-UP Coach respectfully inform the Public, that it will be despatched, in future, e morning at a quarter past G o'clock, from the White I rse, Angel, and Saracen's Head Inn Coach Offices, Dale- ect. lioute.—Prescot, Knutsbrd, Newcast , Wolverhampton, Dudley, Stourbridge, Kidderminster, Worcester, and Tewks bury, to the York Hotel, Cheltenham, where it arrives at half past 7 o'clock in the evening. BR. THfiRTON, EVANS, REEVES, GODFitEY and CO., Proprietors. ' , V Observe, the "BANG-Lr" is the only Coach on the above route on Sundays. IN:j01,1101)11:SLE MINERAL TEETti Without Wires or Ligatures, AND FILLING DECAYED TEETH WITH MINERAL SUCCEDANEUM, WITHOUT PAIN,_HEAT t OP. PRESSURE. MONS. J. M. and A. MALLAN, No. 46, BOLD -STREET, Liverpool, and 82, KING -STREET, Manchester, Suacsox DENTISTS, (of the Firm of Mallan and Sons, Great Russell street, Blootasburv, and Half-moon-street, Piccadilly, London, where they may 'be consulted daily,) ardently thank their Friends ai-d the Public, for the distinguished support which they continue to receive. Their methods of filling decayed Teeth, without heat or pres sure, and of fixing loose, natural, or artitici. Teeth, without wire or ligature, are too extensively known, d too highly esti mated, to require any lengthened exposit' in advertisements. The instances of tne perfection of this ew Principle, as re gards mastication and the articulation of words, are so numerous in the British Metropolis, that Messrs. M. rely more on the good report of their patients than upon any thing which they them selves could publicly advance to recommend it; they cannot, however, refrain from stating that the imminent advantages of their system of constructing and fixing artificial PALATES and TEETH are in no case se evident as in giving the patient the power of clear and distinct pronunciation, more particularly in the sound of the Dento-lingual Double Consonant TI!, whilst the nasal and palatel sounds are rendered perfect and uninterrupted. Messrs. M. submit that these are advantages of the utmost conse quence to Public Speakers, as well as to private individuals, la bouring under natural or accidental defects of enunciation ; but when to them are added the appearance of juvenility, which their Artificial Teeth give to the countenance of aged persons—and that they are guaranteed to bite the hardest substance without pain or injury—they feel themselves justified iu claiming that palm of superiority in Dental Surgery, which has been so unanimously awarded to them by the inhabitants of London and Paris, and other continental Cities. The Faculty are constantly welcome to witness the applica tion of the MINERAL SUCCEDANEUSI, which they so universally recommend. _ _ _ _ vw Attendance in Liverpool and Manchester daily. Qq.Charges as in Paris. One of the above tom may be consulted for a short period a Mr. 'l'. I-1. Hoy's Dublin Medical Emporium, No. 10, West moreland-street, Dublin. LIMERICK ASYLUM FOll BLIND FEMALES, AND CHURCH OF ENGLAND CHAPEL. TIIE above named important and interesting object has been brought before the religious public of Liverpool by the Rev. E. N. Hoare, who visited this town with a view to collect contributions in aid of its funds. The object in view is the erection of a CHURCH of ENGLAND CHAPEL, in a parish which, containing 16,000 persons, is yet without a Parish Church, (local circumstances rendering the erection thereof impracticable); and, at the same time, establishing an ASY LUM for BLIND FEMALES, an institution much needed in Ireland, as will appear from the fact that for one vacancy, on a recent occasion, in the only existing inst . ration of the kind in that country, there were not less than fo candidates. For the accomplishment of this work, t e 'Trustees (who are five Clergymen of the Established Ch , and the friends and promoters of the object) can look on y to voluntary . contribu tions. In this way the sum of £lBOO has been raised in Ireland, and £6OO in England. - Among the contributors are ninety-four Clergymen of the Established Church. A further sum of £6OO will be required, to complete the buildings, which, it is hoped, will be finished in August next. SUBSCRIPTIONS. Rev. W. Dalton .....£5 0 0 Mi. M. Jamieson . 0 0 Mr. Moses Edwards ..2 0 0 Miss Lloyd 3 0 0 A Friend 1 0 0 Mr. G. Langtry 3 . 0 0 Mr. G. Gurden 1 0 0 Mr. Lawton 1 0 0 Mr. Thos. Horsfall...l 0 0 Mrs. McClean 1 1 0 Mr. Harrison 2 0 0 Mrs. Prescott 1 0 0 Mr. Adam Hodgson ..1 0 0 Poor Member of St. Z 0 2 6 Mr. Wm. Jones 1 0 0 1 Luke's Mr. Wm—Benson ....1 0 0 Rev. William R0e....0 10 0 Mr. Branch 1 0 0; Mr. Robertson. 0 10 0 Mr. E. Cropper 1 0 01 Mr. Rigby. 0 10 0 Mr. J. H. Cooper lO 0 I Rev. J. H. Stewart ..1 0 0 Mr. J. M. Conway I 1 0 Mr. W. Simmons ....1 0 0 Mr. Carter 0 10 0 Mrs. Speed 0 10 0 Collection after a) - Mr. William Tarbet 2O 0 meeting in St. An-1 0 0 Mr. W. Wainwright 1 0 0 drew's school-room Mr. W. Winstanley 1 1 0 Mr. E. Jones 1 0 0 Additional contributions will warded by the following gentles Roe, Mr. W. Jtixes, Exchan: Dale-street, and at the office of .be thankfully received and for. men :—Rev. 3. JONES, Rev. W. ge-buildings, JAs. LAUGHTON ; - the Liverpool Standard. TURN-OUT 'CA mor.s.—Ou Thursday last, Richard Flannagan and William Henry, two tailors, formerly in the employ of Mr. Caspar, a Jew clothes dealer, in Shude-hill, were brought be fore the magistrates at the New Bailey 4, for assaulting Mrs. Caspar, and threatening to burn down the premises. It appeared that about a month ago Mr. Caspar left home, en trusting the management of his business, during his absence, to his wife. About a fortnight ago a dispute took place between her and the journeymen employed on the premises, and she was obliged to discharge them, and since that time the shop has been watched by a regular sentry, who have used the most violent threats against those - workmen who have dared to take out work in defiance of them. On Wednesday evening a mob of fifty or sixty tailors assembled round the shop, and amon g st them the prisoner Flannagan was most conspicuous. Mrs. Caspar inquired from him the reason of such a mob assembling round the door, when he declared that they were determined not to let any man work for her, but would burn the premises down before morning, and at the same time he pushed her back into the shop. Mis. Caspar immediately seized him and with the most determined resolution, held him fast until the arrival of an officer, who took him to the lockups. The other prisoner was amongst the mob, and it was proved that he had threatened to mark - a woman who was taking out some work at the time. The mob did not finally disperse until eleven o'clock at night, and Mrs. Caspar was under the necessity of employ ing an extra watchman to guard her premises, fearing that the threat of burning the premises might be carried into execution. In their defence, the prisoners caked a tailor na m e d M‘Quirk, who proved nothing for - them, but was himself identified as the principal director of the sentry, and as having been seen about the shop for several 'hours together since the turn-out, and it was also proved that he had told one of the witnesses that he received a guinea a week from the union, for performing this ser vice. Mr. Foster ordered him to be forthwith taken into ens tody„ and directed that he should find two sureties, in £2O each tokeep the peace for six months. The other prisoners were ordered to find two sureties in £25 to keep the peace for six months, and all three to give twenty-four hours' notice.—Bail was put in for Flannagan on Friday, and he was discharged, but on Tuesday he was again brought up iu custody, chai:ged with having committed a similar offence at the shop of Mr. Rosenstall, another Jew tailor, whose establishment has, in consequence of the turn-out, been reduced from fourteen men to three. On Saturday afternoon, Flannagan and two other men attacked Mr. Rosenstall at his own door, and threatened to provide pistols to shoot him if he continued to carry on his business in the manner that he was carrying it on. Mr. Rosen stall accordingly had him taken into custody, and the magis trates ordered him to find two sureties in £2O each, to keep the peace for three months.—Manchester Herald. THE LONDON AND GREENWICH RAILWAY.—This railway is the germ of an immense line of railroads stretching to Dover, with its continuation from Calais to Paris, and throughout the whole of France to the Mediterranean at Marseilles, tlie whole of which vast extent of lines of road are about to be covered with railways by Joint Stock Companies in England, and in France by the Government of the country. We give in the following calculations a view of the advantages and savings of time and expense resulting from the railways, thus reaching from Liverpool to the Aletropnlis of France: Miles Hours, From Liverpool to London, by the Grand Junction _Railway _ 210 10 From London to (over, over the London and Greenwich Grand Viaduct or Railway (the plans for the continuation of this line being now in the Private Bill Office in the House of Commons) 72 4 From Dover to Calais, by Steam Navigation 2L 2 From Calais to Pari., by Railway, determined on by the French Government l9O 9 493 25 Almost the time now occupied in travelling from Liverpool to London, per coach, and the whole distance at an expense of less than £3; whilst the intercourse between Liverpool and Dublin by Steam Navigation, is secured to the port of Liver pool by ten hours sail. Thus, therefore, the disadvantages of distance will be as it were annihilated by the railway system, and nations will become as provinces of the same territory. LONDON GAZE TTE.-TUESDAY, JULY D. INSOLVENTS. George Atkin Ali Market-place, Newark-upon-Trent, and Long-rosy, Nottingham, grocer. Samuel Stockton, Long-yard, Lamb's Conduit-street, wine-mer chant. _ . BANKRUPTS. John Bevil, Harley ford-place, Kennington-common, auctioneer. John Wright, Chancery-lane, law bookseller. Thomas Bridgwood, Folley-lane-end, Potteries, Staffordshire, clay merchant. . . _ John Bolton and Richard Barnes, Preston, Lancashire, corn-mer chants. John Bolton, Preston, Lancashire, coal-merchant. Francis Marriott, jun., Mapperley, Nottinghamshire, brewer. Thomas Broadhurst. Stockport, Cheshire, bender. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. W. and M. Throup. Long Preston, Yorkshire, millers.—Hughes and Gilbert, Gloucester, linen-drapers.—Wylie and Co., St. Louis de Po tosi, Mexico, general merchants ; so far as regards C. Eyes and J. W. Cooke. Wilson Chilton and Co., Sunderland near the Sea, Durham, ship-builders.—Parker and Co., Southampton, surgeons ; so far as regards H. J. N. Parker.—Brewer and Lowin, Zeaciing, school-mis tresses. Don and Kay, Berwick-upon-Tweed, wine-merchants.— Steele and Beecham, Garth,s near Kendal, Westmorland, lime burners.—Cox and Co., Oxford, bankers.—Thomason and Smith, Leeds, confectioners ; so far as regards B. Smith.—Brooke and liar- Brave, Kirkstall, Yorkshire, woollen-mautifacturers.-Burrows and lackburn, Stonehouse, Devonshire. drapers.—Waller and Co., Clif ton-place, near Bristol, milliners ; so far as regards A. Graham.— Wilts and Co., Friday-street.—Cheesewright and Son, Bristol, wine dealers.—G. and W. Ingall, Bordesley, near Birmingham, brass founders.—Bradley and Faulkner. Manchester, portrait painters.— R. and J. Barrow, Kendal, Westmorland, grocers.—W. and J. Hig gins, Birmingham, blank tray and iron kitchen furniture-roanufac turers.—Harper and Sons, Sunderland near the Sea, Durham, linen drapers ; so far as regards A. harper.—Ainsworth and Co.. Ileapy Lancashire, bleachers.—Lamb and Kipling, Barnard Castle, Durham, surgeons.—Seahrook and Nugent, Rood-lane, .Fenchurcli -street, win e merchants.—Sayer and Co.. Brighton, Sussex, linen-drapers ; so far as regards A. Sayer.—Metford and co., Bristol, linen-merchants. I)IVWENIjS, July 31, J. Watson, Liverpool, merchant —Aug. 7, R. Church, Liverpool, coach-proprietor.—July 27, J. Sanderson - , Gerrard's Cross, Bucks, victualler.—July 30, F. Preston, St. George's-place, Hanover square, and Sloane-street,. Chelsea, confectioner.—July 31, IT. C. Curlewis, Hanover-street, Hanover-square, tailor.—Aug. 1, Bow el der and Bonsor,Oxford-street, tallow-chandlevs.—July 31, 8.8 reeds, Hastings, Sussex, lime-burner. —July 31, W. T. Godfrey, Wolverton Mill, Bucks, miller.—Aug. 1, S. Garbett, late of Birmingham, mer chant. —Aug, 1, B. Brown, Leeds, fax-spinner.—Aug. 1. S. S. Har rill, Newby, near Leeds, dyer.—Aug. 5, W. White, Great Bridge, Staffordshire, groeer.—Aug. 6, W. W. Lyon, Barton Turn, Stafford shire, brewer.—Aug. 2, W. Howells, Monvthusloyne, Monmouth shire, shopkeeper.—Aug, 1, P. Valentine, )3ury, Lancashire, hard wareman.—Aug. 1, It. Roberts, Birmingham, plumber.—July 31, D. Lodge, Poole, ironmonger. CERTIFICATES, JU !X 30. T. Pierce, Liverpool, oil and colour manufacturer.—H. Greuher. Liverpool, oil and colour manufacturer.—J. and C. Pitt, Worcester, goldsmiths.—T. Artier, Florseferry-road, builder.—J. Monkhouse, Bagnigge Wells Tavern, St. Pancras, tavern-keeper. TEE Ll VEI inperiat Varliament. HOUSE OF LORDS, MONDAY, JULY A. - The Corporation Offices Bill was read a second time.—Or dered to be committed. On the motion of the Lord Chancellor, the third reading of the Limitation of Actions' Bill was postponed till to-morrow. Mr. Bernal, and others from the Commons, brought up the Artillery Pension Bill, and the Parish Apprentices' Bill.—Read a first time.—Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS, MONDAY, JULY 8. The Speaker took the chair at ti minutes past 12 o'clock. Mr. Hoag presented a petition, of which he had given notice, from the subjects of his Britannic Majesty at, the Cape of Good Hope, agreed to at, he believed, the largest public meet ing ever held in the colonies, and assembled under the sanction of the Governor. The object of the meeting was to take into consideration the orders in council of November, 18.31, propos ing certain resolutions relative to the conduct of the slave owners. (Hear.) The petitioners complained that the impo sition of these orders was equally unjust and uncalled for; but as the Government had, since this petition was agreed to, de termined to suspend those orders, the alarm occasioned in the minds of the slave holders would.in a great measure be dispelled. - The petitioners went on to express their willingness to co operate in any plan of the Government to ameliorate the con dition of the slave, consistent with the equitable rights of pro perty and the state of the colony. They nevertheless repre sented the injustice of legislating for any . body of British sub jects who had neither any representative in that house nor were adequately represented in the colony to which they be longed. The honourable member called the attention of the Government to the subject. Mr. STANLEY' said it became less necessary for him to make any observation in answer to the complaints of the petitioners, the honourable member for Middlesex having stated, that since the petition was signed an order in council had been issued giving the governor of the Cape the power to suspend the exe cution of. tee orders of 1831, which latter orders bad not arrived at the Cape at the period of signing the petition. He also ex pressed a hope that the bill which had been introduced by his Majesty's ministers on the subject of negro slavery, recogniz ing as it did the rights of property, would reconcile any dis cordant opinions that might be entertained in the colonies, and induce alt 'classes of his Majesty's subjects to render Govern ment every assistance in their power for carrying the measure into effect. He thought the present an unseasonable time for discussing the question of colonial representation, and as some documents would shortly come before the house with reference to this particular colony, he thought that would be a much more convenient period tor entering fully into the consideration of the question. At this sitting the house was wholly occupied in receiving pe- .itions. The Speaker vacated the chair at ten minutes past 3 o'clock. The Speaker resumed the chair at 5 o'clock. CHURCH TEMPORALTIES (IRELAND) BILL. On the motion of Lord ALTHORP this bill was read a third :ime. Mr. SLIE:I, moved an amendment by way of declaration in the preamble of the bill e to the effect that the property of the church was public property, and available to the purposes of the state. He telt it the more incumbent to press his amendment in consequence of the unaccountable and cowardly withdrawal of the 147th clause by ministers,—a clause which, in common with the large majority of the house, he had regarded as the most important feature of the measure, involving and asserting as it dip the great principle of the right of the state to . apply church property to such uses, other than ecclesiastical, ao.the legislature might think fitting. In declaring that he thought the 147th clause a mast important feature of the bill, he did not mean to deny that the abolition of the vestry cess and other provisions of the bill were essential reforms in the present sys tem • but he must maintain that the withdrawal of a clause which explicitly asserted the great constitutional principle that the property of church was public property, resumable by the state as circumstances might dictate, was a departure from those pledges and declarations of ministers which, when out of office, had won for them the approbation of the public, and which this very session had induced the house to sanction their coercive bill. The hon. member here referred to the vote given by Sir F. Burdett, Mr. Bernal, Mr. Brougham - (now Lord Brougham). Sir Thomas Denman, Lord Ebrington, Mr. R. Gordon, Sir J. Ilobbouse, Messrs. Kennedy, Lamb, Ellice, Maberly, Rice, Lord John Russell, and Sir J. Scarlett, in fa vour of a motion of Mr. Hume, to the effect of declaring that the property of the Irish church was public property, vested by the state in the church for certain public uses, which no longer being attained, the state, repossessed the right of applying its property to such useful lay purposes as were expedient. On that occasion, in answer to Sir R. Peel, who stated that the principle of the hon. member for Middlesex's motion would lead to the spoliation of not only church hut private property, the then Mr. Brougham said God forbid that the legisla ture should regard churcli property in the same light they did private property. (Hear, tear.) The hon. gentleman concluded by moving, as part of the preamble--" That whereas the pro perty in possession of the established church in Ireland was under the control of the legislature, and was applicable to such purposes as were deemed most fitting for the best interests of the community at large, due regard being paid to the rights of all persons interested." Mr. HOME seconded the motion. C_ olonel DAVIES had no hesitation in saying that the conduct of government was inconsistent with their professions a few weeks ago, for he asked was it not understood, both in and out of the house, that the present measure was not to be a bit-by-bit improvement, but a real and sweeping reform of the Irish church? In his opinion the most valuable part of the bill was that very portion which had been expunged. If the 147th clause had never appeared in the bill, the question of the alien ability of' church property would not have been raised on the present occasion; but there was a Wide difference between not mooting a subject at all, and, having mooted it, then abandon ing it. (Hear, hear.) If the principle of that clause was not readmitted, and a motion should at a subsequent period be made to reject the bill altogether, he should feel it to be his duty to'vote for it, because he considered that the measure, as it stood at present, so far from pacifying the people of Ireland. would only create disappointment and discontent. (Hear, hear.) ..On a division the numbers were : For the amendment se Against it ' 177 Majority against it 9l It was in consequence lost. On our readmission into the gallery we found the house consenting to several verbal amendments in the bill. When the house came to the 50th clause, which contains a provision for the reduction of the revenues of the Bishop of Derry, Mr. O'CoNNEne said, that in proposing an amendment to this clause, he would remind the house that this bill, as origi_ flatly proposed by the noble lord, contained a system of taxation upon all the present incumbents of ecclesiastical benefices in Ireland. The system was objected to as unreasonable, and in consequence the bill was altered so as to make the taxation commence immediately after the decease of the present holders. This alteration applied also to the bishops and their revenues, so that there was not a single person possessed of a benefice in Ireland who would suffer any diminution of this income during his incumbency. This rule was universal, with one exception, and that exception was the present Bishop of Derry, and his reason for now coming forward with an amendment, was to call the attention of the house to the unseemliness of making the right rer. prelate such an exception. In common with his Catholic brethren, he owed a debt of gratitude to that right rev. prelate, far had it not been for the countenance of that right rev., personage, he and others of his persuasion would not have been entitled to a seat in that house. He knew of no other fish clergymen who had taken the part which that right rev. prelate had taken on behalf of his Catholic fellow-country men, and therefore it was that he came thus pubicly for ward and called upon the house to decide, whether the Bishop of Derry should be the only exception to the rule established in this Gill. The only reason which could be urged for this excep tion was that the Bishop of Derry had accepted his bishopric knowing that the government had this arrangment in view. But this arrangement was originally intended to apply to every bishop and incumbent in Ireland; and as it had been altered with respect to them, he saw no reason why it should remain unaltered with regard to the Bishop of Derry, on whom, by remaining unaltered, it placed an unseem y mark of degrada tion. Connected as the right rev. prelate was with certain leading members of the administration, it was possible that government might have felt some delicacy in placing him in the same situation as the rest of his rev. brethren ; but he thought that they ought to discard such false delicacy, and not be afraid of rewarding a friend when his merits deserved' reward, merely because it might be displeasing to an enemy. He should therefore propose to leave out of the clause the words " the now. Bishop of Perry," and to alter it so as to make the annual' payment of £4160 out of the revenues of that see to the commissioners under the act fall only upon the successors of the present bishop. Mr. O'DWYER seconded the amendment in a speech highly complimentary to the Bishop of Derry. Mr. STA:ILLY was not impressed with the propriety of acced ing to - this motion by the arguments of the hon. and learned gentleman opposite. If the house were legislating for the in dulgence of political principle, or for the sake of gratifying . pri vate feelings of regard, there was no man from whom either ministers as a body, or he himself as a private individual, would more regret to take away part of his income than from the Bishop of Derry (hear); for there was no individual in whose hands a large income could be better placed for the benefit of the church. (Hear, hear.) The hon. and learned member for Dublin might think it right to express his gratitude to the right rev. prelate for the part which he-had taken upon the great question of Catholic emancipation. He rejoiced that the right rev. prelate had taken that part; but his payment for it must be found in the good feeling which was beginning to prevail be tween Catholic and Protestant, and not in an increased payment of £4OOO a year to him as Bishop of Derry. (Hear, hear, hear.) The right rev. prelate did net accept his see under an engage ment that his votes in favour of Catholic emancipation should meet with such a munificent reward, but under an engagement that when Parliament dealt with the revenues of his see, his vested interests in them should not stand in the way of reform. In consequence of the alteration which had been made in the bill, the government had not. made that reduction in the reve nues of the see of Derry which they had ori ghially intended. Instead of reducing it £6OOO a year, they had only reduced it £4OOO. • Sir 11. INGLIS was prepared to support the amendment with out reference to the political principles of the right rev. prelate for whom the hon. and learned member for Dublin had been pleading. He would not be a party to diminishing th e i ncome of a single clergyman , much less to leaving a right rev. prelate a soiitary exception to the rule applied to all other persons of his rank and importance in the church. Mr. FINN opposed the proposition of his hon. and learned friend, which he thought a most extraordinary one, coming from church reformers. If there was any great debt of gratitucle due from the Catholics to the right rev. prelate, they ought to pay it out of their own purses. Ile would reduce the whole of the incomes, but he would make no exception of this kind on the ground stated. The learned gentleman, at the close of his re marks. put a question to Mr. Stanley as to theactual amount of the income of the Bishop of Derr?. Mr. STANLEY said he had been assured by the registrar of the late bishop that the net income of the see did not exceed £12,000 a-year. • The amendment of Mr. O'Connell was then put and nega tived. On the question that the bill do pass, Mr. LEFIZOY rose amidst cries of "Oh I oh ! oh!" He ob served, that although he had already expressed his opinion on the second reading, he could not let the present stage pass with out adding a few remarks. He was hostile to the bill, on the ground that it would interfere essentially with the property of . the church in the hands of the present holders. It went to make the bishop a rent charger on his own estate, and took f►om him that control over his tenant which he had heretofore had in case of the nonpayment of his rent. He had a most strong objection to that pat t of the bill which prevented parishioners from erect ing a church in any parish in which any religious worship had not been performed for three years before the passing of the act. This he conceived most unjust to the Protestant inhabitants, for it extended to no other religious persuasion. On all these grounds he was opposed to the passing of the bill, believing that the best interests of religion were bound up with the established church, and were greatly dependent upon the due maintenance of that church. Mr. W. E. GLADSTONE said that he would not shrink under POOL STAN DARD. the ignoble cloak of silence as to the grounds of his vote. He had heard a good deal of 'abuse of the Irish church, as being rich and sluggish, and some.hon. members opposite seemed to shrink with horror from the supposed imputation of risinc , to defend it. He would admit that the Irish church had done' little for Protestantism, (loud cheers from the ministerial side, ) but was that the only church against which the imputation could be made ? He would beg of those who seemed to think that primitive apostolic poverty was necessary to stimulate the zeal and activity of a church, to look at what took place iu the valley of the Vaudois. The people there maintained the pure principles for which their ancestors had fought and bled, but was it found that their activity as a church was in proportion to their want of worldly means? No : it had been greatly sup ported by money from this country. But how did it act ?—it acted solely on the defensive, and never sought to make an im pression on the principles of its surrounding Catholic neigh bours. , He would admit that the established church of Ireland had long slumbered, but he would contend that since the union it had done all that human power could do. The question how ever was, not what it had done, but was it capable of being fitted for action? He-contended that in a social point of view it was no slight advantage to have scattered over that country a num ber of men who were gentlemen by education, and, more espe cially, who were Christians by profession. The existence of such a body of men in that country was also of no slight impor tance, as affording a connecting link between it and England. But he did not defend it on those grounds alone, nor was it on those grounds that he opposed the present bill. He opposed it because he thought it would tend to desecrate the established chug and the desecration of a church must be productive of the nMt serious injury to a country. He thought it was,of the utmost advantage to a country to have a body capable of spread-, ins and extending the Protestant doctrines, and without mean ing any offence to his Catholic fellow-subjects, he could not but think that it would be productive of great benefit, in a national point of view, to have the means of expounding, defending, and maintaining those doctrines in an active manner. All he asked was, that such fair opportunity should be given, and then God defend the right., (Hear, hear.) He feared that the probable effect of the bill would be to place the church on an untenable . foundation. He objc.ted to the reductiml of the bishops, as calculated to prevent the future expansion of the church, and because when once the bishops should be diminished it would be difficult to replace them. He protested against any surren der of the principle that a nation might be taxed for the main tenance of a national church; at the same time he admitted the desirableness of avoiding a collision with the people of Ireland. Of course the bill must pass the house by a large majority, and he was willing to hope that, as doubtless was intended by its framers, it might strengthen and extend the church establish ment. After some further discussion the house divided, when the numbers appeared — Ayes 274—Noes 91—Majority ISO The bill was then passed. 'On the motion of Mr. H. CUTITEIS, the Sea ApPrenticeship Bill was read a third time and passed. The Irish and Scotch Vagrants Bill and the Tithes Commuta tion Bill, were read a'second time. The Royal Burghs (Scotland) Bill was read a third time and passed. LIVERPOOL BOROUGH. Mr. WARBURTON1110;a111al , five be the quorum of the Liver pool election committee, on the ground that if a larger quorum were fixed, it would be impossible to obtain a sufficient attend ance of members to carry on the investigation. Lord SANDON contended that the decision of so important a question ought not to be left to a majority of three, anti he there fore moved, as an amendment, that the quorum should consist of eight members. • After some discussion the house divided, and the numbers were— - For the original motion ....85—Against it...2B—Majority The house then adjourned at half-past three o'clock. DOUSE OF LORDS, TUESDAY, JULY 9. The Earl of Carnirvon took the oaths and his seat. The Earl of RODEN . presented a petition from the Synod of Ulster against the new system of religious education in Ireland. The individuals who had agreed to - this petition, his lcrdship observed, were as strongly opposed to the system as the Synod of Scotland, a petition from which body was presented a few evenings since by a noble lord opposite - (Lord 13elhaven.) CONFERENCE WITH THE COMMONS. On the motion of the Marquis of Lansdowne, a conference was ordered forthwith in the. Painted Chamber with the mana gers on the part of the Commons, for the purpose of communi cating to them their lordships' concurrence in the resolutions of the Commons on the subject of the renewal of the East India Company's charter. CHURCH TEMPORALITIES (IRELAND) BILL. The Duke of BUCKINGHAM, seeing the noble earl at the head of the King's government in his place, and observing that a bill, materially affecting the established church of Ireland, had been brought up from the other house, wished to know when the no ble earl meant to move the first reading of that bill? Earl GREY answered, that it was his intention, as was cus tomary, to move the first reading of the Bill immediately; he believed that in general it had not been usual to make any objection to the first reading of a bill when introduced from the lower house to the House of Lords, and he should there fore move "that this bill be now read a first time." The bill was then read a first time; ordered to be read a second time on Monday next, and to be printed. The Bishop of BRISTOL rose to present a petition from, as, we understood, the clergy of the diocess of Oxford againstthe Irish Church Temporalities Bill. The petitioners complained that the intention of this bill was, and its effect would he, to assess and tax the clergy of Ireland most partially and unjustly; and they prayed, as it was evident that it would be subversive of the interests of the church, that it might not pass into a law. PUBLIC EXPENDITURE The Marquis of LONDONDERRY rose to move for certain re turns, the production of which he believed the noble earl on the floor would not oppose. When they heard of the enormous sums which were now about to be levied on the country for the purpose of carrying the great plans of ministers into effect, — when they heard of the Russa-Dutch loan, and other items of expenditure, amounting to between 40 and £50,000,000; and when they looked at the extraordinary embassies which his Majesty's ministers had sent to different quarters, and from which the country had not derived any one benefit, he thought their lordships would feel that he was not acting very wrong when he asked for an account of the expense incurred in the foreigh department since the noble earl was placed at the head of the government. 1 - le should therefore move, first, for an ac count of the expenditure in the foreign department from the sth of January, 12527, to the sth of January, 1833, distinguishing the amount in each year; following up the return of 1827, which was upon the table : second, an account of the expenditure under the head of secret service money, from the sth of January, 18.32, to the sth of January, 1833, in the foreign department, the co lonial department, and the admiralty department: third, an account of the expense of the extraordinary embassy of Lord Durham to St. Petersburgh, in 1832: fourth, au account of the expense of the Duke of Wellington's extraordinary embassy to St. Petersburgh, in 1826; and fifth, an account of the expense of the extraordinary embassy of Sir Stratford Canning to Ma drid, in 1832.—Ornered. SCOTCH BURGH REFORM. The Earl of lIADDINGTON wished to put a question to the noble viscount opposite with reference to three bills relative to the burghs of Scotland, which had been that evening brought up from the Commons. An alteration was to be ir►ade both with respect to England and Scotland. As to England, the dif ference in the constitution of the burghs was so great, that it was deemed necessary that inquiry should precede legislation. 'lt soon appeared, that though inquiry was not to precede legis lation, yet that inquiry - was nevertheless to take place; for by the orders of the House of Commons, it would be seen that it was intended to call for a commission to inquire into the consti tution of the Scotch burghs. lie should now ask whether it was the intention of His Majesty's government to proceed with that pekion? and if they did proceed, whether they would also, pending that inquiry, go on with these bills? and, finally, to what objects, unconnected with these bills, and which would be unaffected by them, the labours of the commission would apply, supposing the commission and the bills to proceed together ? Viscount MELBOURNE said, undoubtedly it was the intention of ministers to advise his Majesty to sanction a commission to inquire into certain points connected with the Scotch burghs. Certainly it was not intended to delay the progress of those bills .until that inqury took place. The matters to be inquired into were in no way connected with those bills, and therefore there was no reason to delay their progress. The Earl of HA DDIN G 1 oN said, he should feel it his duty (and he believed other noble lords would take the same course) to state why, . in his opinion, it would be better to inquire before they proceeded with those bills. CHURCH TEMPORALITIES (IRELAND) BILL. The Archbishop of DUBLIN rose to present a petition from (as we understood) certain clergymen in the diocess of Dublin, praying for alterations in some of the provisions of the Irish Church Temporalities Bill, but not opposing it entirely. LOCAL JURISDICTION BILL. The LORD CHANCELLOR, the order of the day for the third reading of the bill having been read, said that. alter the indul gent hearing which their lordships were more than once pleased to afford han when explaining at length the principles and details of this bill, he felt that it would be unpardonable in him then to further trespass on their attention, and therefore would simply move that the bill be then read a third time. Lord WHAFINCLIF'PE moved, as an amendment, that the bill be read a third time that day six months. He proposed the amendment, not, he assured them, in the spirit of party, but from a sense of public duty; and he had waited till the last moment in order to see whether it was possible to avoid the task 4without a sacrifice_ of duty. A bill so introduced as that was, founded on the report of the Common Law Commissioners; and submitted to their consideration by the highest law authority in the realm, should not be condemned till after the most careful and patient examination; accordingly, he had wholly abstained from expressing his dissentient Opinion till the last stage, when it was as perfect, as it were, from its framer's hands as in the nature of things it could be expected to be; and when the ques tion was, would they assent to its adoption as a measure calcu lated to promote the well-being of the people ? The bill was then before them as it came out of com►nittee. He had care fully examined its provisions; and the result was his conviction, that it could not realize the expectations of its advocates, and would materially impede the happiness of the people. He there fore called upon their lordships to do their duty to the people, and 'reject it. The Earl of BOSSE, in support of the bill, contended that the 40 years' experience of the Assistant Barrister? Bill in Ireland, which was based on the pridciple of the present measure, was decisive as to the practical excellence of that principle. The bill was well worthy of support, for it went to make justice cheap, and to place it within the reach of the poor suitor. The Earl of Wicx Low begged the noble earl to bear in mind that there was this great difference between the Irish assistant barristers and the proposed local judges, that the former were non-resident, and practised in the courts above, while the latter would be stationary, without any such means of improving them selves in their profession. He begged to assure their lordships that if the house should vote for this bill on the supposition that it was supported, as his noble friend had stated, by the 40 years' experience of a similar sy s tem—namely, that of the Ass►stant- Barristers' Courts in Ireland—they would be altogether mistaken in doing so, for that system established in Ireland was totally different from the system proposed to be established by this bill. Lord LYNDIIURST said that at that stage of the discussion he felt it his duty to address their lordships. He was well aware - that, considering the office which he held, he-ought to discuss a question of this kind as little as possible in the spirit of party or political debate, and he therefore rose thus early in the evening for the purpose of candidly and fairly stating to their lordships the opinions which he had formerly expressed, and which he still entertained, with regard to this measure. He knew full well that out of that house—lie would not say in that house—he had been charged with being influenced by party motives in opposing this measure. He would be leave, there fore, to state exactly to their lordships the position in which he stood in reference to this bill. When his noble and learned friend on the woolsack first introduced this measure, lie stated in distinct and precise terms that it was not a government measure, but that he brought it in on his own individual responsibility. (Hear,hear.) He (Lord Lyndhurst) then expressed to his noble friend in private and, he believed, in a note which he sent from circuit •to him, the opinions which he entertained respecting this bill, and his noble and learned friend must then have known that it was his ( Lord Lyndhurst's) intention to give this bill his oppo sition. If the measure, since that period, had been adopted by his Majesty's government, that surely was no reason why he Nt\ 4 thaAl N h ,„ ,0r4,N,111 . .giiiipes , Fo ‘li t % • N., C .114, 44 1 41 0 k 10 1;: i; : . .,„ 44 N ih N ik.s ibitor y 's 4 .. , \ 7 . 7% \ * bp \ _ 4„. _Ns .`,-..t \ ‘ .... ~,,_,_ V 17 1 ,.. ., ...;np,-R, rXVZ III u+r - r• t. , .m.,;,-. 0 % 4,L,,,,,,,: tts ere stared, nay frowned, upon public men, merely because tikeY public men of whose actions they were jealous. Who then t O O. l O be insane enough to brave public opinion—to injure hi honour ? Who would be regardless enough of both ? Iv 'l t° would endanger his personal safety—for who would venture guard him against impeachment—to appoint to any o f to situations any persons from private friendship, personal coon.ce.) tion, or indee'd any motive but fitness for the office ? (Ch eei h s i i Who, he asked, would dare to do this ? He would petit to noble and learned friend whether it was not likely that in town in which those judges resided there was not likely to noblell newspaper? (A laugh.) Noble lords might laugh, and , and learned lords might laugh at the mention of a newspaperhls he never yet in the course of his experivce saw a judg e nev er did not laugh when a newspaper was inefftioned, but he knew one of those learned personages who was willing to ex yet,, pose himself to the censures of the press. (Laughter.) S lowna„ as there existed a judge and a watchful press, he believed iut impossible that that judge would go wilfully wrong ni s e,n d manner as judges had done some 150 years a,go, when they a o „, so dreadfully stained the ermine. lie had already stated the grounds upon which he thought it desirable to make these Vp'e pointments. The main argument being that it was desir a that all classes should be able to obtain cheap justice at all tint every Again, with respect to patronage, he had framed the bill for t 7.. advantage of others and not of himself. The noble lord (14 . n,,, pat was then on the woolsack, and it was proposed to the ronage in the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the o: 11 e 1 house. He did not feel that he ought to thank the house 1.l0! the manner in which he was treated on that occasion, but t " R u, would say no more upon it as they at length extendeda l't praise to him, although with a stingy hand; he would not there, fore find fault. But he thought he had a right to find fault tot" nob:e lords when they misstated facts. There surely was n `,i occasion for that. (Loud laughter.) The noble an d Tearne;,, lord (Lyndhurst) might have got into the regions of faacY order to enliven a dull subject, but then he ought to have Orrid fined himself to pure fiction, and not have misquoted his ( 1 ) 0 0 Brougham's) statements. All the noble and learned lord's f a (such as they were) made for his own side of the ques tion, I against his Lord( Brougham's,) at last he got into a seri,es.llld ef inaccuracies which would have done honour to the late (- Justice of the Common Pleas. (Laughter.) Lord WYNFORD rose amidst loud cries of 'or der, order - He was determined not to be turned into ridicule by any no lord. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought the noble lord ey.treu;eil,Y,i out of order in his interruption. It had been well observed " Dean SwWYift, that— ea LordWYNFORD again rose, amidst loud cries of order, a 1 , insisted upon having the 15th Order of the House read, aft% which he would appeal to any noble lord whether the noble a l t. , learned lord ought to proceed in the course he was then Pa is ing—(laughter.) The Clerk then read the 15th Order, for the regulation o f tile d basiness and debates of that , House, in which it wa s o, '' "That, for the honour of the house, no noble lord in t he cou' of debate was to use any expression which was offensive, sha rl . l ; or taxing; and, on the other hand, where it appeared no ofleavid was meant, no offence should be taken ; but where it was , offence was meant, the house would visit it with its severest Oa sure."—(The reading of this order was received with c ontieue't laughter.) Ihe Lorin CHANCELLOR begged to assnre their lorash,,ig that he would endeavour to comply with the first part of order; that of not S aying any thing that, according to dern times, which differed from the former, could be sidered offensive, sharp, or taxing—(laughter) ; and he tr ns , o l the noble and learned lord would conform to the se c ". c o part of the rule, and not take any thing ill or , offer"„hi Which was not so meant—(loud laughter). Why On( the noble and learned hard talk of - the appoineme a ' four judges, and the expense of £150,000. In reconilue,"ey ing these judges to receive £1,500 a year, he thought that would be under rather than overpaid; and if these were 'l;Jb';, number, the whole expense would not amount to more tba"?_.„; tween £50,000 and £60,000 a year. He would not confine a'7,5 self to his present statements, but would refer to the ollig o ' ° ,o which he delivered in 1826 on Lord Althorp's Motion. 7 , 1 " e talked of vesting the patronage in the Lord Lieutenant s-0 "o would have it placed in the Crown—some would give it to °°s, quarter, and some to another' but the general impression t o f that it ought to be vested in the executive government, vvitit:.ea course, all requisite responsibility annexed. What h e des"' 0, was, to give to the King's subjects the blessings of cheap g.,5 vernment and cheap law. His noble and learned friend 'lc, anxious to make it appear that he was connected with no patio and he told their lordships that he had considered it righl,he speak early in the debate, as a judge should not go int°,:ff contentious parts of it, but only, as it were, to proceed eoL.,# and calmly along in smooth waters. (Hear, hear.) But %a his noble and learned friend came to reconcile this profes s ' c o with the active means and powerful partizanship he had sl°,l, himself, and upon every occasion since the bill was intr oduce of he could not for an instant imagine. Most certainly it was ° r e compatible with hislisual calmness in his study, or in the M t °, sacred places which he attended in his meditative hours, " : "„'",t he should have consulted all the books that could bear ag,"'d this bill, whether anonymous or otherwise , and stored his h a t , with all the taunts that could be made use ofi to deride it. Av."„" c l, ever way he looked at the course pursued by his noble fr; e i t o he must say that his noble and learned friend took all cr y advantage which his position gave him as a debat er to de d i the measure now under their lordships' consideration ; th °° ,7 e r all he had said on the present occasion was covered e:e., with a purely legislative, and more purely judicial c harao i s i than he had displayed a year and a half ago, when another ce,J, important, though not judicial question, was brought fortokiii, The learned lord then went into a general defence of the via and dwelt much on the expenses attending suits in the sup 4)- courts. "My lords, (continued the noble and learned °, ha t I will not, until you yourselves persuade me of it, believe a ll you intend to throw out this bill. I hear strange rumours 0 ' o f kinds, in all quarters. Whispers fill the air. Every specie,sce tale is borne on the winds. Nevertheless, I will no t belietiv them until you, my lords, convince me, and even you can convince me by coming to a vote to refuse ,to pass this My lords, lam ,not here to flatter you. It does not benie me. I neither give nor take flattery. I will tell yo ur lords,le then the plain truth, which, be it as it may the less platy:li is at all events the fairer and the more honest course. I tell you plainly that, if your lordships throw out this b ill, it `,„; in no way relax any efforts of mine in favour of law refor'" or , and whoever expects by it to damp or discourage me Iron: 01 '0e secuting such measures as 1 think necessary to the safety 0!. country, the honour of Parliament, and the good of the 1 3 ' 3 1 i' o . subjects, reckons without his host, and in me mista kes his 'aims (Cheers.) But to say that I should feel no mortification, 'C'et, I should be in no sense discouraged, that I should not to a h 1 Lain extent despair, would be affecting a state of mind Avlli c e could not feel ; for undoubtedly when I first to ok the °,ice which I have the honour to hold, my great_ nd primary 0 1° ,0 was that I might have the means of using the official infl" e dlt of my station to accomplish effectual and adequate,thoro cautious, safe, and judicious measures of law reform. ((Al ec '' d Therefore, although , I shall continue to discharge my dutY , , it be to propound measures,. of reform, they then, of course, vc i i o to moderate —they then will be inadequate, and applying to P"o4e ' of interior importance • because it would be useless to prqdat what experience would have shown to be impracticable., ;to such measures as there is a chance of getting your lordsht accede to I will propound. Within those limits 1 shall sti ready, although it be but half an inch of the way, to a ccorali io o your lordships. But, my lords, lam not the only p ersou expectations will be disappointed by the rejection of this l'dam" (Hear, hear.) It may be of little moment Whether you v v . :. my hopes, and dash the cup from illy lips. But your coa will be disappointed. I perceive that word had exciteda as I was certain it would, amongst a number of noble lor o il" se the most safe, and prudent, and dignified course that thi s could possibly take would be to disregard all such cons' are tions, and not to care whether the hopes of your c ountlY )/ damped or no. (Cries of " No, no," from the oppositioa:iret Well, then, my lords it is untrue—you do care—you do r e rileit to damp the hopes or your country—you do lament any step would frusti ate the expectations of the people. I hear til iiio d joice at it, and, as I am confident that that is the frame of "' t oe in which your lordships now are, I am bound, on the intiretnos' which your lordships rave just conveyed to me, to exP ec is tic e you will not throw out a bill which brings home cheap ti,!i to every man's door, and wh ich, if you do - reject, - you to et country that, through this ch a n ne l at least—and n o ot',Pso, pointed out—through this c h anne l t h e hopes and ex p ectatio the country are not to be realised. (Cheers.) The house then divided, when the numbers appeared - - :9 Present Prox,' For the original question Bl 41 Against it Bl 53 17 t he Majority for rejecting the word "now" When these numbers were announced several pee rs lel"r; ill house, but it appeared that a second division was necess'tgsi': order finally to decide the question. The gallery W I , cleared, and, upon the amendment of LordWharneli'oe&l, the words "this day six months" be inserted, the house divided, when the numbers, independent of proxies, (''s were not counted this time,) appeared— For the amendment 73 Against it 6B Final majority against the bill —5 ,P c In the minority were included, it was said, the ot" l 3 ,,te f bishops who happened to be in the house, the rev. Pr e o ve,, Exeter having quitted immediately the first division waseol On the other hand the majority would. have been incr en i!„,c ll „ , three, had it not been that peers to that numb er only r` o c0.,"1 the house after the question had been put , an d they werrescw sequently obliged to remit their votes, not having been ,1 ) . when the motion upon which the house divided wa s real' The house then adjourned at Two . o'clock. • • - HOUSE OF COMMONS, TolgeoAx,, ..I.tmv , c lor c i: 1 ; The SPEAKER took the chair at a quarter-past Twe lve °I, 0 There was a remarkably full attendance of members side 'of the house. „4? COMMUTATION OF TITHES (ENGLAND)• „11 0- :r The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved that to- ,1,4 v resolve into a CoMmittee on the Tithes Comunitatioo k Ot tot' land) Bill. t. Mr. BARING observed that, as there was so much iriq' fli , it business for determination in the present session, iti.etberl:re perhaps, save time if he were to ask the noble to %be* was his intention merely to state his views on the questio;esel the house, and then postpone the matter until the next l it or to pass auy part of the Bill in the present session. „rese.di The Cu ANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER replied that hi!,ris,i'ri; object was to omit every part of the proposed, nieodt6tbe'itte rendered , compu•lsory the commutation of tithes. Ir he r '`oc place, the Bib would permit parties to contract toge'" foor out restriction; and this part he intended to pursd e • It sl O other portion of the Bill there was greater o bjecti" l ' t 'i o a, et`' the desire of the government to give general satisfac, e lo 0 , 1 0 , from what lie hail heard he did not think that the w i l l , bl i p sure was likely to attain that object. (Hear.) l ' e 'etl e . , l 4 wish, therefore, to persevere in that part which ,w 3s 4 objected to; and he therefore wished to omit all tre e , after the 12th clause, with the exception of tw o or th were not so material. es ci The order was then read and carried. The hous e r into Committee. The CHANCELLOR of the ExenEQuEli handed to ~ L ae Cli air various amendments, which, however, were not read. i. _or A Member complained that they were no t deseribeve bled: The CHANCELLOR of the ExeneQuna reminded ° J oe ,ao' able member that the Bill was merely going thron,glitissiM mittee pro firma, with the nudeistanding that'uo dig r teJL O O to take place. AR he asked was, to have the bid reP t ° it 0' the alterations he wished to make in it, in order tb' be printed, and afterwards subjected to discussion. u , to b 9 ~ijV Hons resumed, report brought up, bill ordere., printed, e and to be taken into 'further considerati°' tb it , se'nnight. LETTERS PATENT. into co ' , On the motion of Mr. Gonsow, the house went ill po i, tee on the Letters Patent Bill. Je t Mr. JERVIS proposed the postponement of the e °° tiiP ° e of that part of the bill which contained the definitioo ° e ir tti and moved an amendment accordingly. g Mr. Li,ovn, as a member of the Committ ee, w°l-1 amendment his most decided opposition. bt The house then resumed, 'and the report was brougloW• ordered to be taken into further consideration to-11101 4 4 0 1 ' SABBATH OBSERVANCE. Mr. PETER presented two petitions for the bette r of the Sabath, and then moved the order of th . e _ lisi t e o r ,,i :j '.' of second readingof the bill for the better observan(_eiooo Laili. The object of the present measure was t° /4, (Lord Lyndhurst) should shrink from opposing it, or why he should hesitate to state openly and with confidence to their lordships those reasons which he thought should induce them to reject this bill. (Hear, hear.) In doing so, he wished, in the first instance, to direct their lordships' attention to the com mencement—to the very first clause of the - bill, and he was sure that it would appear to their lordships on reading that clause, as it did to him, that this bill was founded on a principle that was liable to the greatest possible objection. It was not stated in that clause that it was his Majesty's wish, by and with the advice and concurrence of both houses of Parliament, to create a certain number of judges of defined and limited jurisdiction, with certain emoluments, and also to create a certain number of subordinate officers connected with the courts in which the said judges would *side ' - that was not the shape in which the clause had been framed. The clause as it stood gave unlimited and indefinite power to hi Majesty, or rather to his (Lord ( i . Lyndhurst's) noble and lea ,c 1 friend on the wooLsack, to cre ate any number of new offs• s that in his discretion he might think fit—any number of ju ges with salaries of £2OOO a-year and upwards, and any number of registrars under those judges with salaries of £7OO or £BOO a-year, and, in fact, any number of subordinate officers that it might seem fit to attach to those courts. Now, he would be bold to say, and that too without the fear of con tradiction, that such a principle of legislation as that Was one that had never before been adopted by the Parliament ofthis country. Let their lordships for a moment advert to the patronage and consequent power which the Lord Chancellor at present pos sessed. The Lord Chancellor had the disposal of church pa tronage to an immense extent, and he thereby posseSsed im mense influence over the clergy of the country. He appointed to the magistracy of the country, and he in that way possessed a strong influence over the whole of that powerful body of per sons. In addition to all that, their lordships should bear in mind that the Lord Chancellor had the direct nomination of 13 out of the 15 judges of the land—that he had considerable in fluence and control over the appointment of the other two—that he had an absolute influence over the appointment of the two equity judges, and that he held in his hands the sole appoint ment of the judges in the new Court of Bankruptcy/ with all 'the subordinate officers attached to that court. The Lord Chancellor, too, possessed the power of selecting for the honours of the profession; that gave- him enormous influence over a powerful and ambitious profession; and if, in addition to all that, they were to throw into the scale the appointments of 30 or 40 judges, as proposed by this bill, with 30 or, 40 registrars, and if, in addition, they were to suppose the office of Lord Chancellor filled by a person anxious to pervert it to private purposes and personal aggrandizement, what more desirable means could any such individual wish to unite in his own per son to extend and consolidate his power than would be afforded to him by the bill which his noble and learned friend on the woolsack., with, no doubt, the most honourable and disinterested motives, now proposed for their lordships' adoption ? (Hear.) It was upon such grounds, amongst others, that he (Lord Lynd hurst) felt it his duty to oppose this bill. He objected to it be cause it went to place in the hands of an individual, powers that would he inconsistent with the constitution of the country, and that might, in the hands of a crafty, able, and designing minis ter, be employed for the most unconstitutional purposes. He gave his noble and learned friend full credit for an anxious de sire to divest himself of such immense patronage. His noble friend had told them, in a former debate on this bill, that he hail for a long while turntd it in his mind whether he would vest this patronage in the hands of the judges, but that lie found that he could not do so. It at length occurred to his noble and learned friend to intrust those powers (and no where, certainly, could they have been with more propriety intrusted) to his own hands. (A laugh.) He objected to it on account of the great—he would say enormous—expenditure which it would entail on the country. An act of Parliament having lately passed to regulate the court in which he (Lord Lyndhurst) . presided, he was enabled to state precisely the expenditure, including the judges' salaries, and other expenses connected with that court. That expendi ture amounted to £35,000 per annum. He did not suppose that the other two courts in Westminster-hall exhibited a larger ex penditure than that, and he therefore thought that he estimated the whole annual expenditure of those three courts pretty accu rately when he stated it to be no more than £lOO,OOO a-vear. That was the amount which the present administration by those courts of the whole civil and criminal law cost the country. His noble and learned friend was now about to introduce a new system of local judicature, the entire expense of which no one could calculate, but which, taking it at a very low estimate in deed, would cost the country at least £150,000 a-year. It thus appeared that the business which was at present performed by the superior courts, and which it was proposed to transfer to those new local courts, would not be performed by the latter at a less expense than One-half more than the whole ex penditure incurred for the superior courts of Westminster-hall. Another great objection which he had to this bill was, that it went to establish a number of local judges throughout the coins . - try, and he was sure that their lordships would agree with him in opinion that nothing could be more pernicious than the establishment of such local judges, subject to local influences, partialities, and feAings. And then let their lordships only consider the immense number of such local judges which this measure was calculated to spread throughout the country. His noble and learned friend bad stated that four of these judges would be established in the ridings of Yorkshire, and thus they would have four judges established in a comparatively narrow district, permanently residing there, subject to the influences arising out of the private friendships and private partialities which they formed in their neighbourhood, and exposed thereby to the charge of partiality, and liable to the suspicion of mis conduct in the cuscharg,e of their public and official duties. (Hear, hear.) That would be the case with all the other local judges which it was proposed to establish in the other districts of the countrY. It was, as he had stated in a former discussion, on the principle that local jurisdictions were liable to such abuses, and had generated such evils, that the local judicatures that had formerly existed in this country had been abolished. It was the abhorrence of such abuses that should induce their lordships now to resist the establishment of such local judicatures. What did the present bill propose with respect to juries ? The local judge was to sit, assisted by a jury of six individuals. He argued that the more you diminished the numbers of the jury, the more you increased the authority and influence of the judge. Was it proper that a judge, with six jurymen, should have the administration of justice, in all the various cases proposed to be intrusted to those local courts, and that without the possibility of the proceedings being reviewed, except in the event of gross errors in point of law? How were the Julies to be summoned? At present judges had nothing to sdo with juries, hut 'here the provision was widely different. Who was to be intrusted with the duty of summoning juries ? The registrar, who wa s the travelling companion of the judge. (Hear, and laughter.) Bettei enact that the judge himself should select the jury, you would then have a responsible person to discharge the duty. The present provision was so monstrous, that he did not think it could have been seriously contemplated by his noble and learned friend. But this was not all : the jury were to be taken from the places nearest to the tribunal and the locality of the causes of action, so that a registrar might, without the least risk, pack a jury, every facility being afforded for that purpose. ( Hear.) And this was the poor man's law. (Hear, hear) In the courts at Westminster the rich could rely upon having an enlightened judge and an impartial jury, but the poor man went into the local court and took such a judge and jury as he could get under the poor man's law. (Cheers.) The judge made a mistake in a point of law—well, there was to be an ap peal on a case drawn up by the counsel on either side, or, if they disagreed (which they were sure to do,) by the judge Whose decision was appealed against, and who' had to state in his own way the error which lie had himself committed. Was this a very satisfactory provision ? He thought. not. "But," said the Lord Chancellor, "the same thing . occurred every day in Westminster-hall ;" however, the superior courts were en lightened tribunals, and besides, if parties disapproved of a judge's case, they had the option of tendering a bill of excep tions, to which there was no analogous provision in the poor man's bill, where it was most required. (Hear, hear.) He had now discharged the duty which he thought he owed to his station and office, which he owed to their lordships, which he owed to the country, which he owed to the profession to which he was proud to belong. He had stated the arguments which struck his mind forcibly in reference to the bill; he had stated the reasons why he should vote against its third reading. It was for their lordships, after hearing what his noble and learned friend had to urge in answer to the statements and ar guments now brought forward,—it would be for the house to decide on the subject. For himself, he had no personal end to answer, no private motive to actuate him in his opposition to the measure ; and whatever might be their lordships' decision, he should cheerfully acquiesce in it. It only remained for him, in conclusion, to declare his assent to the amendment proposed by the noble lord (Wharncliffe). (Cheers.) Lord WYNFORD opposed the Bill. The LORD CHANCELLOR said that he rose with very great anxiety, and that axiety was increased by the vast importance of the subject. By the suggestion of the Chief Baron, the Bill was referred, with his (Lord B.'s) assent, to the discussion of the Commissioners. It was postponed a year to await the event of that discussion. They investigated its principles and details —they considered the subject, and amassed this body of evi dence upon it. They came to a conclusion favourable, and nothing but favourable to its principle, and the Bill was altered to meet their suggestions, and was now such in its essential principles as the Commissioners had reported in favour of. His noble and learned friend said, " You do not go the length of the Commissioners." He was at issue with him upon that point, and came to trial before their lordships. The evidence was the report which he held in his hand ; it proved that he was correct in his statement, and that his noble and learned friend, inno cently no doubt, had not attended to - the report, or if he had ever attended to it, had utterly forgotten it; but the fact was; that he had grossly misstated it—stated what was directly the reverse' of the statement and report of the Commissioners. Now, first, he would address himself to the local residence of the Judge. He had on a former occasion moved a resolution-that no local Judge should reside except in a large, and populous dis til& He went entirely with the committee, who, after the most minute inquiry, not blinding themselves to the probable inconvenience of a 'Judge residing permanently in a place where he had to try questions of torts, still felt that the advantage of such an appointment by far outweighed its inconvenience, inas much as it brought justice, and that ton cheap justice, home to the doors of all classes of society. On this, ground it was that they decided the balance of eviis was in favour of the measure. It was true that there were evils, or at least inconveniences, at tendant upon this as there were upon all other human institu tions, and he should be glad to see any measure introduced free from that imperfectton attendant upon human infirmity. But he repeated the balance was in favour of the measure; and he would venture to state that, when their lordships came to sift it to the bottom, they would come to the same conclusion that he and the commissioners had come.— When the noble lord asked him about the pernicious etfect °fa local Judge being appointed to try cases between £5 and £2O, and certain petty transgressions, he begged leave to ask, in his turn, whether such a Judge was not as fit (or may be more fit,) to try such a case, he being ignorant of the parties, than the magistrate who uniformly resided in the same locality, who tried cases in his own mansion; or he would go further, the JusticeS who tried eases in threes and fours, or even at the Petty . sessions, where they were likely to be mixed up with, and prejudiced by, the feuds and jealousies, the political and reli gious opinions of the neighbourhood ? And vet these persons tried, not only for smaller offences, but even: for transportable felonies, and were looked upon by the law of England as the most cherished body in the country; And he beiieved there was no man in the assembly he had the honour of addressing, or any other assembly, who would venture to find fault with the jurisdiction of the Magistrates on the ground of their local resi dence, or breathe a thought of their unfitness for the discharge of the duties imposed upon them, or a suspicion of their acting with the slightest shade of prejudice or partiality in their judi cial capacity. And yet they were of necessity essentially local; whether a man was a Magistrate in the county of York or in the smallest county in Wales, out of that county he had no juris diction. Here, then, were judicial persons exposed to all the feelings of friendship or enmity, to political and party feelings, to religious opinions, and, above all, to those parochial dissen sions so common in most districts, and yet they were thought the most fit and proper persons to discharge the 'duties imposed on them ; and no matter what might be . their decisions, the aid of the Court of King's Bench was seldom called in. The proposed measure, however, was not without appeal; and further, there would exist another, a great check and control upon the conduct of the local judges—the check of public opi nion ; for, so placed, the eyes of the public would be constantly upon them. For himself he had no muse fear of such judges than he had of the appointment of judges on the bench; he had no apprehension of an improper appointment, or an abuse of the trust conferred by that appointment when made. The public