The Sun. — London, England, 1806-02-04 00:00:00

man (Mr. Fitt)., but as a precedent had been esta : . blished.by the House in. that instance, t he should yield to the determination of Parliament, and aqui-. esce in,what had been proposed by the Noblo 'Mover. ,Afr .IrILPEPFOIIGE _gave his testimony cf feelings and 'greatest approbation tO the Motion in 7 troduced by the Noble Lord. It Was his gratification and pride, as an Englishman, on .taking a view: of Lord.Cornwalli,s's Adrdr tistration in India, to ob= serve,. that alibis acts were those of N.vistilOrti, ..rM nesS.,".and humanity. In the whole cOtiiseflf his long and laborious life,. he seemed to IlavelotOiliese .objeCts in views =toe good of his Ccittntry,slnd the happiness of those whom he goyerned.' l ' "'" Mr: 0 i:L/1121 rested hiS objeCtioll to the Motion principally- on the . grond that the. Noble Lord had Introduced into it she' Peace of Amiens and the Union, in .both of Which transactions the Noble Marquis had a - share.' Withoutinquiring -. into the mer;ts of .the Peace of Amiens, it . was sufficient for his purpose to ohje6t to the Motion, when he was told that the Noble Marquis\ hada share in sanetion ing that measure (the Union) which had proved so ruinous to his country. He trusted, however, that if that measure was not rescinded, at least that the most obnoxious part would be &One- away. ETOTC' wis satisfied the prtposi . tiotl now 'offered to the consideration of the HOuse, not only met - with the -app-obation . of -the House, but with that.of every individual of that widbly tended region in wfp:Chthe Noble Marquis had act ed so conspicuous and. beneficial apart. ' iI Alciernan PREVCE? concurred' in opinion with the Hon. Gentleman who-preceded him. The mode of establishing the -hereditary property was a Measure which was calculated, alone, to endear the name of Marquis Cornwallis to all the inhabitants of India. . Mr. FOX, in' expressing his concnrrence . with the Motion, .was happy todo - it upon the general merits of the N ble Marquis, : and not ou the ground of. ' Any one particular service wAicu tie-II:lot have ren clez , .od the Countiy; he gave his -vote With the more satisfaction, becauSe the Motion. did not contain any such expression as -=-" -excrlicmc St - itesmar." The introdudion of , the Union into-the speeell of the Noble Lordel,and upon which subjea tleman behind him (irlr. O'HARA) 144.4liseitite,d ; and described as a ruinous measure, serygd. only to remind him .(Mr. Fox) that-the act wasffi - i the most disgraceftil this Country had. ever witnessed. - The Motion was then put and carried.... Lord . PASTLEREAGH presented 'some_ additional - . i'apers rer,peaing the, Treaties- enteredinto between this Country . 31 , 1,the:Court ..of St. Petersburgh; &c. which were laid 'on the Table. MR. TITT's DEBTS. • - Mr. CARTIFRKMP rose to make his ,lotion . for an Address to His I\ - lajest; .for the payment of the debts of the late Ri g ht Honourable William Pitt. The Hon: Member observed, that he should 'fol low• the linee-adopted by the Hon.'Gentleman on a former evening,:7and abstain from entering into any matter which might involve a difference-of opinion. lit shOl:id adhere strictly to the precedent in thecase; of . his illustrious .Father, the. Earl olChatham, fdr the payment of whose debts the, Natiob had provided: • If he thought, on the present. occasion, the proposi tion he should submit would defraEt form the great ness of hisichargter as:a Patriot and Statesman, he. . certainly should not haVe, come for Ward but he had yet to learn that the -payment of 'the Noble', Earl's debts had , sunk him in the estiMation of his country. opportunities of annexing other emolu-! meats to the places which he' held, and -which-were not sufficiently lucrative to maintain him jn'the splendour of Prime nnister, he • had ,at the end of ten years, and that at the very earnest solici• tations of his' friends; set:tired to-himself only the Wardenship of the Cinque Ports. So far from • the accumulation of his debts affixing a' stigma upon his dark - ter; his poverty became a' virtue. - He' had nor, with reference to his own :etnolument, ag g!andized places, or secured a pecuniary reward; his integrity and virtue therefore stood upon no com- pion irtt.m . d6. He would 'Submit - to 'the Committee Who sat last year, whether his condikt did not rise. above - suspiciOn. The Hon. Gentleman theq passed some farther eulogimns on the merits atitt: ervice9 o the iljghi Hon. Gentleman, and addekti twith rt-peft to the sum necessary to defray. 4 - 44 7 ' Lits, it 11,4 d been found upcni an investigation' that'l t s le sum of 40,0001. would. he sufficient for that puiVote, He , then concluded with moving, '. 1 - 14 i an liumble Address be presented to His Majesty, gating, t:,at tiiis House- had been informed that the late IZ4;lit Pitt lett debts to a considerable amount,. for the minent his property \ was insufficient ; and this Hotise being dein mus to show respect to the memory of the sait Right , Pitt; humbly beseech is Ma. testy, .tat a hi would •bc- graciously pleased to order, that a sun: not, exc, e., - ;1}1,4 40,0001. be granted towards the pAyitient of the said lion. William l'itt's debtS, and asstire . Its :PArijesty tha': taus House will make good the same." Air.. BOOTLE - seconded the Motion. -The Hon. Ivre4-I!), f i- con.,idered the money, Which it Was in ' letireLl oe voted, as a public debt due to the Ri g ht 'Jon. Gentleman for his 'eminent services ; he trusted, therefore, that unanimity would prevail. was 'that Gentlemen entertained• different •Oi n ions. Sottieo.t.ere' of opinion 'that .theipaYment of cf,c ,Right ilon Gentlema'n's'debts'xtereamore fit subjea for public subscription ; while others were agtainst'establiSleng as a - precedent a' Motion of the kind now submitted. With respea to the first ob jeCtion, he was -satisfied in his, own mind that the , ;services -of t light Hon: Gentleman had a great Claim upon, the 'it;erality of the •Nation and with ,respea to the Ilitter objection, it was well known, that. though great differenceoloninion prevgiled in tLe year 1777, yet .e'arlianu all concurred that it was a duty which_they.could not forego, in : paying the debts. of. the Earl of Chatham; an,: therefore' Caine to one general vote on the questio::. .3 , 1 r. IC 1 N. 15 re. ssed the fiat which lie felt inziviA4 vote for , tig:27lo ~ :, 2 i.aSa he ,t, Could wi4n consistency concur in t „et : bound the House to nothing moTetham shev,,tinj a ,mark of, respea to the abilities and integrity of Mau who had; for a series of years,, with great and sPlendid ta lents;devoted his life to the service Of his Country. No difference of opinion could prevail as . to neglect' in' pecuniary, concerns' in that eminent person.; and it was to. be -lamented, that in the very high station which he'fillo - an adequate reward had.not been ap portioned to defray the charges incideritaflo - his sta-, IL would not 4e indulging any improper sen- , tini4lt if he was to express a wish, that, for the fu= Lure, the place of Prime Minister was rendered more suitable in point ofemolument. • .GE b GE. .2') 0 3O`NI Y said, treat whet) the for Mer Motion was made, it Was with the utmost relktance that ie fjlt•himself compelled to give it • his negative. If then he gave that vote with pain, it vas v ith particular sati'sfaetion that' on the'present occasion he could -cordially join in,,giving ptit.t his sup •." It was not the debts of Mr, Pitt that Parlia • rent were called upon to pay, but it was, as an Honourable - Gentleman had_ truly stated, the debts of the Pike. For . a period of twe:tty years the , Country had reeknized him intbecharaaterpfa Chief Minister, , and supported him as such ; but unfor tunately.. th.ead4iven him too little to support_ this exalted siation, Considering the rank and situation, and comparing the sum (40,0001.) with the term of his seryiees;,bis wonder was excited that.the amount of his debts was SQ . small. Whatever occasions Might have occurred in. which he had differed from the Right HOn. 'Gentleman, he had done so' from, Motives 'ofpublic duty, and. not from any personal r4ncourw,aniniosity. Hp wished to be indulgent to his failings. Lord rOLKSTOAT could not agree with the ground upon_ which the Hon: Gentleman seemed to put the Motion. ,The public services of the Right Hon. Gentleman, in his opinion, • 'Were not so emi nent as had been descrilaed. He could not admit his Statesman-like talents, or . Public disinterestedness. With ,iespe.6l. to the disinterestedness of another per son, a friend of the Right Hon. Gentleinan, the manner in which that person had accepted of the Cinque Ports, formed a striking contrast to the con duet of his friend. Thus much he was prepared to adMit, with re,pea to' the disinterestedness of the obje& of theiMotion. Admiral HARVE Y acknowledged the pre-emi nent abilities of the Right Hon. Gentleman, with ‘,•ll9fn he had on many. occasions concurred in senti ment', and upon oth . ers differed,' whenever he was not -absent tip . on his professional duties.. He ex ercised that judgment which it wai hiS ~iuty to exercise upon every vote which he 'had. given 5 but upon this kii2.-lyt he should consider himseltungrate-, ful, - while recognizing the services of the Right Hon. Gentlernan, were h 6 not to join in the vote which was how called for.. Mr,'/P:2l/...521%/ri.E.admitted the disinterestedness. .• Of the Right Hoii.„ - Gentleruan, but did not consider that qualificatioU s a sufficient reason for calling upon the tiou r so f to agree to the Niotiori.. There were.two quesiions in the case—first, whether the salary was adequate to, the rank of the Right Hon. Gentlethan ; and secOndly, whether the services of the Right Hon'. Gentleman Were such as to entitle hi - SI - lien:1510 all 'Upon the Country to pay his debts. If the House were prepared to acknowledge the in adequacy of the salary, why then it would become necessary to increase the future salary of the - Prime .I.Vlinizter, in order that . it Might not furnish a pre text fbr a similar application at a- future period.— Withresp - c6.1 to the'savices, he was, not inclined to admit theni to the extent which Gentlemen who wer: friendly to the Motion wished the House to do. lle could not consent that Ministers should, by a side wind;,ed.mycear (as this Motion evidently in tended to do) to ge,t: an approval.:of their eonduCt. • I ,have heard Mr. Pitt called the Saviour of his Connlry from a scene of anarchy. (Hear ! hear !) glad;" said Mr. SMITH, « to hear Gentlemen so Manfully reiterate the sentiment, and endeavour to draw the -Holfse, by its vote, to a subsequent ap probation of their conduCt.-- . --(A cry of No, no.) hope the . Gentlemen will, hoWever, then rise and tell' the House, that they really do not mean to call into 'question the utility of those measures whith I - and those with whom- I have acted have uniformly condernned." Mr. 'SMITH • contended, that greater . inroads had been committed upon the Constitution, -• in consequence of the system pursued -by the . Right Moil. Gentleman and his adherents, than had taken place since the Revolution: Was •itto be consider ed as a mark of eXtreme virtue that Mr. Pitt should not cOndeseend. 'to peculate in order to enrich him-, sclf. If he' had done soeit •Nyould have entailed dis- • . grace upon .hithself. He; however, entertained a ' better opinion of the integrity of the Right Hon. Gentleman, and was convinced he was above all such • • mean considerations, His reason for disagreeing with the Motion was, upon the grounds of the un-- suceessfuleitettions which the Right Hon. Gentle-, man had made. . If the Friends of the. Right Hon: Gentleman had judged it expedient, to open a Pub lic Subscription, Mr. Smith said, he would with plea Sure have, 'Contributed his share - i but the ob- jeCt of the present Motion, he was afraid, was mere ly_to get their own condn6t , sail& ioned by Parlia ment;' and therefore, lie - stiould; - on the grounds 'of consistency with the vote he gave. oa a former evetl-., objeet to the Motion. • •••' , Mr. RUSE asserted, that the merit of his Right lionourableFriend e now no more, was such asjustly entitled him to the best wishes; of his .Country, and to every .tributeof respect and gratitude, both pecu niary arid. honorary, whiCh, she could. pay to his Memory. 'That. the Honourable Gentleman who had spoken lest, might not Suppose that the private friends ofMr.Pittwouldnot gladly have prevented any appli cation iTeParliarnent, had such a step been acceptable. to his Right Hon. Friend himself, he (Mr. ilcise) was . in condition to shew. A proposal was leak in the year 1788, when it was supposed'that it might have been Mr.-Pitt'S lot to retirefrom•office; to present him with 100,0001.- ',An Honourable Baronet near him (Sir P. Baring) had assured him_ (Mr. Rose) that the sum could be got. in 48 hotirs. He tried 'his -Right Hon. Friend on the - subje& - , and foupd him completely ad verse from it, declaring, that as he should answer to God, no eeiisideration should induce' an to accept it, and in -this resolution lie persisted, declaring, that if he, felt himself ka f uncomfortable, it was his determina t to return to his , profession. In the year 1801 another proposition was made to him, which he also rejeCied.. !tie . could mention many more acts of IliSinterested-rie and - magnanimity; but he thought he had said — eiikiiigh Id justify' his voting for the Mo • tion, and he. - would not any longer detain the House. ,Iti ailcc was convinced that the majority of -the Country were sensible otthe sery ices, of the Right Hon. Ge.ntleman.who was the object of the Motion. His own opinion was, that Mr. Pitt had, by his exertions, sheWn himself, under Providence, the . :Saviour of -his. Country. • justice. Hone were called • 'upon to-do ail 'aft 'a 'of public.; The Right • I ionourable Gentleman had a strong claim upon the liberality of the .Flonse, Mr. _ Mr. W. SMITH elplained.-- . --He said be ineant,to convey ho idea that the chara6ter of:Mr. Pitt was not ve4ealy disinteTested. That was a feat* of the rti; - sht- Hon. Geritlensan which required :no public , - testimony. • .I\,slr. CUMMING believed Mr. Pitt to. have been 4 most excellent Statesman, and he,highLy.apProVed of the present Motion. Mr. EL. LISSOIV said, it had been his honour •._, uniformly to support Mr. Pitt's measures.i. Fle-ebn sidered the motives by which that great Minister. was aauated to haVe been pure and honest. He trusted, that whatever difference of opinioutnight have pre vailed on a former -night, there would nonor be a dis•-• sentient-v.oice,on the present occasion: • Lord DOUGLAS wished to give this ivithont reference • to any political considerations; tie looked upon the'Nloiion as an ata of generosity on the part of a great Nation towards a servant of the Pub lic, but notes a man without blemiSh. Mr. FOX—" I certainly did mean to give a silent vote upon this occasion, because I did conceive that if a general unanimity had preVailed, I should have best expressed my opinion, -by simply observing, that such a Motion bad passed nemipe .contraciicente. 'But, Sir, that not being the case, I beg - leave to declare to you and the House, that I never gave - a vote with more satisfaction in my life than I shall do 'this night in support of the Motion. :I conceive it to be a tribute due to departed wortb-=the reward. of a great and munificent Nation, to a meritorious Scr- : vant of the Public. I will own, however,-that • the manner in which the. motion was introdus:ed was not calctilated, if I had been other Wise disposed than I am, to induce ine to give it my assent. I consider this question as perfealy distinCt from the vote of ,Monday.last; !but Imust, say a few wards with re spea to an expression adopted by an FlotL Gentle man on the other side of - the HOuSe, wlio; soak ing of Mr. Pitt, called him the Saviour of his Colin:- try. Now, upon that subject I beg leave to •say, •zthat I maintain all my former opinions quite unal •tered, as. they have constantly been from the rho . meat the Country was in the situation in whichit appeared in the years 1863' and 1804, I cer tainly thought it expedient, and for the adVantage of the Country, that the political debate and ani mosities Of those and former, times should, as far as related to, persons, be buried in, oblivion. I thought it would not be proper for me at_thet period to take a great and princial share in the AdMinistra tion of the COtintit.-- I did not conceive - - :ir'ssiould be behaving in -the 'minter which l• have , ever4lt_toi•be the rule of Propriety:. I thought, and. am convinced, that Mr. Pitt had the same Sensation as myself: 'He certainly did give the most ample testimony of his wish to bury all animosities. From that time, though :various warm debates nave occurred, I have cautious ly abstained from referring to those topics that might excite former differences. .Ifelti that he had given un, equivocal testimony Of hiS intention: I confirmed, and we have mutually persevered in ourdetermina-• tion;. I think, therefore, that.the House will do me the justice to say,. that if I would not while he lived touch on such subje&s, much less would I do so'now he is dead. As far'-as , relates to me; :neither now nor ever will I touch upon - them. Bet if' those who were no parties to our mutual- determination think other Wise, and that such' teipies'Onght to' be discussed, I beg leave to state, that laM 'riot averse..; from personal motives to-enter into them. .I con ceive it unnecessary to do so for reasons think right I shall 'religiously 'abstain from any mention of them. --The Right Honourable man himself, when living,.diciso.generally.and sys tematically. I did feel a wish that he; should - form part of the Administration of - thc. Country, thought it not right at that moment_ .to hoe any. share in ; I therefore deemed it improper:to-refer to his former conduas If 'there had' been any words in the present 'Motion expressive of any approba tion of his measures; it- would beimpossible that it could be, adopted svith unanimity ; but I give: my support to it because it is net liable to any such objedion. To speak of Mr. Fitt, that he did not descend:,t9 any improper measures with regard to money, would be to, diShOnour his memory ; but we are to consider - other 1 - natters in which his condua was equally unblameable. Mr. Pitt was .Mi nister for 20 years, and to the best of my know ledge, except the Wardenship of the Cinque Ports, I-do not know9f,any one, office Collllts,OCd with him of a personal 'natures. He had nut only the merit of ageneral disinterestedness, but -possessed in every particular that diStinguishing feature. It ,is ;indeed a kind of testimony which, since the accession' of the House . Of Brunswick, I' May Pay with equal truth to almost every Prime Minister. ,I think Mr. Pitt is intitled to' that praise ; and I think we should - bestow it, in a manner, that if he!could know What' Was now going on, it Would not give-him pain. The Motion has my cordial support." Mr. CANNING had hoped he should not have been called upon to say any, thing in support of the Motion. .He hoped that in the little be should say, he would not deviate from the candour and mode ration so laudably professed on the other side, but used. at the same time as a'veil to throw over one or two propositions in which he did not agree.. Some, of the Gentlemen on the other side were Willing to allow Parliament to discharge the 'debts of his late Right Honourable Friend as a matter of e'enerosity towards an 'old public servant. - He wished it to be known, : however, that the friends of that illustri- ous person would not be satisfied to receive. the vote as an eleemosynary grant to posthumous neces sities—not as the boon of pity or cornpasSion—but as a public debt to a highly, meritorious public ser vant. He was not from the beginning so, sanguine as to expel?an unanimous vote ; he would not pur chase unanimity by conceding' a tittle of the set - - vices of that illustrious man. Referring to the pre- : : ceding night, he appealed to the House, whether it was not on the other side that the topics of dissen tion were started I—Objections were made on that occasion to the form of the motion: .Theifault he fbund with it was, that it sis-aS coldp4 ittildequate to the feelings of those who supporteg it. . When - the friends of the great man • who vilas' r tiliPsilibjeCt of these Motions consented to: neutralirilhe ex pression of their feelings for the put pose:of:remov ing the ground's of opposition to the Motion—wben theTresolved; instead' of dipping the,pedinto the heart, to look into- the Statute Book for a preee defit—when they had lowered and. diluted every, glowing feelingwhen 'the)y had restrained and chas 7 - tised the order of their affeCtions, hi Order to con-: stitote unanimity, the,result had added to the many Fool's he* had seen ,in - the course. of his political ife,slliat nothing was to be gained by cornpro rpise. Now the Hon Gentleman cauvasted para. cutar andthus agitated topics whie.-. were' omitted to avoid creating di4ussion. Mr. A IF - Thr.iVll3 to order, deprecated the prac tice, of reverting, to „former debates. Mr. CANNING hadno desire-to go back farther than to shew that the agitation of the objects of dis tention originated on the • other side; -It-was ea - ='• pealed-13y those who brought forward this Motion in such general terms That it would have been very .generally . supported. HOWever widely political dif ferences.nlay have ranged; it was hoped that now. all those differences would be] buried-in the grate, and that all political animosities would cease. That. it would .be: said — f , All thy good now blazes forth, • t " All thy evil is in the gruve." That brilliant luminary that:was. before us, whether its 'dawn was clouded, or its meridian splendor ob scured, had held a course glorious for the Country, and worthy. to call forth: its admiration and gratitude. He now protested against the mode in which the Hon. Gentlemen gave their support to the Motion:, - and wished to restore them the benefit of tl i iat consistency which they. laboured so Much to recon cile with the support they gave. He gave credit to the Hon. Gentleman who refused his consent, be.. cause-he did not 'see the merit. He 'confessed he' did not'see the ground on which the Hon. Gentle• man opposite to him followed a distin& course, If it was given as an eleemosynary grant, without any disfinelion of merit or demerit, he disdained it. He could not - help complaining that the Hon. Gentle-, man opposite, while professing' to avoid all points of political dissention,' cast a general stigma on the whole systeM of the present 'Reign, during one half of Which .his Right Hon. Friend had ,been at the head of affairs. This was not in tine recolle&ion of the Hon. Gentleman when he took credit to him- , self this night for not being one of those who in. troduced such topics.. He begged'Gentlemen again, to consider, on what ground they agreed to the Motion. Those who did not vote for it on the ground of Mr: Pitt's merits, had better oppose it openly. It was - only as a tribute to great merit that he would receive it, and if any one 'supported it on any other ground than as a testimony and a reward. of these merits, he wished him to withdraw his sup. port, and preserve his consistency'by opposing it. Mr. FOX in explanation obserVed,lliallthere was a considerable difference- between commenting upon patticktlar instances of. a Minister's conduct, and .anirnadvprting.upon. the genel - al system o .4clm,ini* stration that had been pursued, not only during the late Right Hon. Gentleman's official career, but during the whole' of the - Reign. -With respe& to what the Right Hop. Gentleman had said as to the ground's upon which he wished the present Motion .to ,be supported,' he-had only to add., that he ha 4 distinctly stated.the grounds of his own vote in fa-, your of'it to be, Mr. Prra''s merits. The Motion, 'on the former night bad stood- on 'a different foot ing, and had been amply discussed on that occasion. -The present question was totally distinEt from that„;, and ought to . be. decided upon its. own grounds. :"Mr. HUbDLESTONE Sillipoitedthe motson. ,The Question was ;loudly called for, and upon beitig put from the Chair, was Carried in the affir mative, nentine contftzdieelak - AVDITORS OF TIIE EXCNEQUER. .I*. FOX Said, he understood there would be se t yeral new appointments under his .MajeSty's.,GO vern met% and-that it was in contemplation to make a Noblc-,Lord,. who was.at,present one of theA.l44tors of the Exchequer, First Lord of the. Treasury. :Some datilDTS - ad arisen ‘7hether the Office. of Auditor could be put in comthissiorh Several of the Noble. Lord's predecessors, in whose" disinterestedness the Public placed the most perfed reliance had - found themselves in a s - nilar situation. The first was Lord Halifax, then Mr. Pelham, afterwards Duke of New castle: .As there . had been a disposition of late years to give the greatest publicity to the Ads of Govern ment, he thought it right to settle the question by. moving 'for leave to bring in, a Bill: to remove cer tain doubts respeding persons balding the Office of Auditor of the Exchequer. He added, that the Houle would permit him he would bring up the Bill, and have it read a first time to night and a second time to-morrow'. The SPEAKER observed, that as this wait a new proposition, it would be better merely to give notice of the motion for leave to bring in the Bill.. Mr. FOX said he was not ihclined to make. a Complete bow to the doCtrine, that notice, of a IVlution for leave to bring in a Bill was absolutely necessary.• Be had however ,no .objeffion tQ ac, quiesce, and he gave notice accordingly. • The •ATTORNEY-GENERAL defended the praaice. of giving notice previous to any Public Motion. Mr. ROSE got up, but Sir JOHN WROTTESLEY called hini to order, and thlt. SPEAKER informed hind there was no question before the House. vlQrogv OF TRAFALGAR. The House resolved itself into C9n - infitteeS of tht - ... whole House upon the three Messages sent by His Majesty,, the first relative to the grant of 200,0001. to Lord Netson'g:firpily • the second upon-'the any nuity of 2 . "01. to Lady Nelson; and the third respecting the-annuity of i,OOOl. to Sir Richard Strachan. - - • Mr. Gu.ts thought that_Lady, Nelson should have had the sane rank as 1)e would liaVe been entitled to if her husband had skirt/wed. . , After a few words.frona Mr. WINDHA*I and Lord CASTLEREAGH, three . Resolutions, confornaabiy to the Messagel; were moved and agreed to. The House .resnmed, and the Reports were or dered to be received ib-morrow.—AAjourneo: . . P.li, I 1..5. .. • Mutt vEn—tHamburgit, i Lishon. I)uE-1 Gotteuburgh, 1 Dublin ? z Waterford. .._ PRICE W. STOCKS THIS DAY AT TWELVE O'CLOCK• + - . 6116( j Red. Ann. - - 611 Consols THE SUN.'' QuIS DICERS FALSUM AUDF.AT LONDON, TUESDAY, FEBRUA,RY '4, ISOG. *THE Ministerlal Arrangenients are at length com pleted. Lord GRENVILLE waited upon the KING yesterday at twelve o'clock, when His MAJESTY expressed his gracious approbation of the Plan of the Nev Admini.stratiou. With respect to the point