The Sun. — London, England, 1817-03-01 00:00:00

&min that mi roper ii;ipirv, if it, nppelaell !lot the pelit s ‘votild lie iloue Thv pet it then c)r tiered to lie On tilt. table. AILNIY AND N.IVY SEDUCTION BU L. On the Motion of the CHANCELLott of the EX , CitEQUFti, the [louse went into a Committee On the Army and Navy Seduction Bill. The [louse having resumed, the Report was brought up.—On the question that it be received, Sir F. iluitnerr complained that the present measures were hurried in skit a mantp , r through the 'llonse, that nn thne wits allowed for the ex _ press;on of the sentiments of the Nation upon thein. lie was hostile to any Bill of the kind. CALCRAFT only opproved of the Bilk for extending protection to the Regent, and prevent ing the seduction of the soldiers. - Sir F. livantor also thought it proper that the same protection should be extended to the person of the Prince Regent as to that of the King ; but objected to the inntwations which were made. Lord FoLKSToNe thonght that the least that could be said of the Bill,was, that it wits unne cessary. All knew, that if an) attempts had been made to seduce the soldiery, they had failed. The present meast.ie would throw a slur upon them ; for it would make it appear, that they were so liable to be seduced, that it wits necessary that little flirting with them should be made puttishalde by ho , . Ile approved of the measure which ap plied to the satin ty of the Prince Regent ; but u,ith respect to the others, he lamented that we -.should think and act so differently trout our an cestors, Lord OssuLsToNi ;tko objected to innovations, end the fctcili y with which the powers demanded might be abused, Sir G. HeATHCO're wished, that instead of tip - pearitig so jealous with regard to what was said to soldiers, more should be entrusted to the,Civil Lie should only give his consent to the illeatire which tended to place the Prince Regent on the same footing as his Maje;Oy. The Report was then received, and the third reading of the Bill fixed for Monday next, YEOMANRY. H. ADDINGToN presented Returns of the • Yeomanry and Volunteer Corps in Great lit itain. He should ttihe this opportunity of adverting to the 'statement of the Hon, Member for Tllont gomerphire - (11r..C. W. Wynne) the other night, • in which that Hon. Gentleman bad seemed to con`vey an imputation against that branch of the Go vernmeut to which lie (Mr. H. A:ldington) be longed, that it was not properly disposed to encon `rage the Yeomanry of the eonntry. He was the more surprised - , as he and his Noble Relation were known-to entertain the most exalted opinion of that constitutional description of force; of the zeal, promptness, ;dimity, and public spirit with which they had attended the summons - of the Civil Ma gistrates, and on many oceatiot:s protected the peace of the country. He bad to state, that since the beginning of October every effort had been I made by the: Home Secretary of State to increase the Yeomanry in all parts of the country, espe cially those where the spirit of disturbance prevail .ol, Ile cou l d appeal to sever a l Hon. Members of the House to whom applications had been made on the subject. For several months past it bad been not only under consideration, but deter mined to revive part of the allowances which wet e formerly Made for that service. - He • had sorely regretted their reduction at the time is ben public economy had rendered it necessary, and he should be most Irappy to use his best efforts to hare them . restored. He was convinced that on the Yeo manry, the, co n stitutional ' force of the Country, its •tranquillity ot•ight in - future depend. Mr. C. W; . .tVyNto!,' owned that pliers had been i.isue& for the Yeomanry tit hold themselves ready for service, either on the Pillaging Act, Or enn.• etant duty, hut - that was to be• at their own ex.. pence. He conceived that the Yeomanry Avatild have more effect • in maintaining . ordersthan double the number of regular troops. Mr. Coax (of Norfolk)• wished to guard against the too considerable increase of that forcei though he adMitted that it was constitittional. Sir 11. FIECtoN thOtight the present allowances for the Yeomanry quite sufficient, when the state of the finances of tire country was taken into con- 'Mention After a few words from Sir GILBERT HEATH. Soft, the papers were ordered to lie on the table. Sir SAMUEL ltomtwr postponed the second reading of the panic Duty Bill till Tuesday se'unight. Sir F. IivaDETT presented petitions for Reform froth Loughborough, in Leicestershire, Stirling and its vicinity, 130ddingtOn, in Nottinghamshire, and Kegvvorth, in Lcicestershire.—Ordered to lie on zhe table. LONDON PETITION. Sir JAWS SfIAW presented a petition which bad beets agreed to this day, in the Common 8011, the language of which was respectful and proper, it prayed that the measure for the suspension of the Ilitheas Coi pits Act 4hould not be passed, and alsn_iettioustratell against the other measures. it Citt.,Ate had not ty:!en able to attend this day's meeting, but agreed in all the sentiments of t h g petitioners. Inc (bought the present measures totally uncalled fur, and uunceessary, Mr. CALCRAFT congratulated the City of Lon don on 118 havingnienrusentative who would thus tome forward, anti : after Jtaviig. witnessed those !nighty curt:lrises tan th,e : Bank and Tower, would speak to their insignikanee, and &chi ll ! th a t it was will the constitutional bt4warit and, shield of the liberties. of the ,subject should he suspended t or one thotogut on their account. ..Hr. I'. Mootte. congratulated the House on the Requisition of evidence which superseded all the evidence hitherto given. 11 Hon. Gentleman Would abide 4y their utytt.seuses, and not by the Ill.fangled Report of the Secret Committee, they would conic to 'the conclusion that that'lteport was s libel au the country, and an attempt, 10 in ) . pose evidence them. He wished that every Alenther shoultVbe called opoo In his place to de clare what was the stete of the putt of the coun try which ,he represented. If this were not done, the country, was condemutd unheard. If the }louse did its 441 by its .constituents, it would set aside the Report. 1(01041.1t, :034 ,th,e opportunity which this petition ri4ferek to call ti ',nn trous. to eon.hivr .how large r , * portion of his iVidjesty' 3 subjects - were prevented front exprrssis u . titeir alatro at the tm.a,titt. prop,rd. And th, y were tliase who would be most grievously affected, the present Bill.‘voold make the coodition of the ► .people its Scotland *till more .miserable than that 'of the -- English. - Ile believed, and if he were ► wrong, he shookd wish to be set right, that the Suspension Bill of 1794 made no difference what , ever between England and Scotland. He hail no idea that a difference had been made until the 13.11 had been printed. In England, by tine 13111 ns it now stood, if a man were .committed to pri.ou on a warrant signed by one Minister of State or six Privy Councillors, he conicl not be. brought to vial without their cot►sent. In Scotlaud, any one . connnitted on a charge of high .treason by an y subordinate Magistrate, even a Sheriff's Substi tute, most remain in Confinement, without trial, unless he obtain the consent of SIX Privy Conn cillors. did not believe that the I-lon. Mem , hers in that House who represented Scotland had any notion of the !Intoner in which they were re cloned to Vote away the liberties of their country. Mr. M. A. TA YLO It was anxious to loom on what grontida such a clause could be justified. The Lotto .ADVOCATE of SCWELAND said, that it was comprteot for any Membei , to pot questions on the subject, but that he did not think himself* boned to answer them until the Bill should ‘be re gularly before the House. Mr. linouGnam agreed with the Learned Lord that it was competent for any lion, Gentletnau to avail himself of the bringing up of petitions to put a question ; but the House could' no longer have any doubt on lie subject, tor it %vas now ascertained by the first Law Officer in Scotlant!, that high authority newly imported - into the lia ise ; gist it .was a right which had been pm etty fre quen,tly exercised before ; a tight to which the country had owed its relief from some of the .worst measures which the House had ever .wrong trout a reluctant Government,- and Dire to which, with the blessing of God, lie trusted still greater improremeots to the Constitution of the country would be due. As to the reason why no answer was given 'to his Learned Friend, it could easily. be guessed. The. ATTORNEY•URN KRAL hart HOtICEStOOII the Noble and Learned Lord to admit, that it was re gular for Hon. Members to put tpmestions, but that • 'as the 11111 would soon be under time regular con sideration of. the House, he thought it ;would ford hint a better opportunity fOr giving tiny ex planation which he might have to snionit, Mr. MAnnocits and General FERCUSSON wished that time should be allowed for petitioning. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER' read part of the Bill of -179.1, to shew that the clause !TN- tire to Scotland was not a new one, but had been copied from it. Sir S, Iti)mii..LY reminded the Right Hon. Gen tleman, that he begged to be Corrected if he was wrong. But the imptirtant . finest WaS' not whether the cliNse existed in the Bill of 17!)1 or nut, but whether any difference ought to be inade between the people of Scotland 'and of Englrod.• Mr. PoNsoNny- thought it desirable thrt the Learned Lord should condescend to iv plain What the Clauserrieant. It was important that the lion. Gentlemen tvlio supported, should at least under stand the Bill. Mr. H BATHURST said', that whatever might he )c merit's or demerits of the Clao'se, there %%ts no. one at present to answer for then), as it hat stood in other Bills which passed the scrutiny ni as great ac e !less and talents as the 1 - louse conk now boast. The Petition was then read, and ordered to lie on the table. LIVERPOOL PETITIG4 4I , -... Mr. BilouonAN.110(1 in. his hands-abother proof of the great advantage which- the 'wintry would derive from any .tithe which the House might Although a single ball day had been given to the inhabitants of Liverpool, they had expreised their opinion in the most respectful but earnest manner in the Petition which he should beg leave to present. When he looked at the names by which it was signed, he found, that they were those of the most respectable, wealthy, and independent inhabitants of that great city. He might „indeed, appeal to the Lion. Nleinber who represented it, for the truth of .what he asserted. The Petition expressed no opinion on the Report 'of the. Secret Committee, but stated that the titioners had reason to suspect that the charges contained in it had been made by designing in dividuals, who had taken that opportunity of in sinuating matters against their neighbours, as in 1794, which they had no doubt facts would dispruve., • Mr. CORE took the opportnnity of saying a few words respecting the imputations which the lt,e port, upon which the 13ill in progress through the Moe Was founded, had cast upon cet (alit Clubs established in different parts of, the kingdom, upon principles which 'could not truly be de scribed as subversive of the Constitntion. , Amongst others, the Norwich Union Club had fusoui itself included amongst those which the Committee of the House of Lords had stigmatised in its Report.: He hail this day received .a letter front Mr. Taylor, of Norwich, one of the principal Members of the. Union Club there--a. Gentleman of whom he might say, that he was likely to be one 6f the very last men in the kingdom who would engage in any project against the Constitution or the Laws, and there was no, man. who knew the Taylors of Norwich, who would not say that they were one of the most respectable families in, the kingdom. . With the permission. of time House he then read the letter, which stated, " that .by a passage in. the Report of the Secret Commit tee of the House of Lords, the Union. Society of Norwich found itself grossly. misrepresented--!-that it was with,t be ut most astonishment that that Society had:found it said that it wits affiliated and associated with atm. ;her Society of the saute name in London, and.. wilh others, the aim and object of which were tine total subversion of the „Ctinstittition ; that the: Union Society nt-Norwich, Was bound by no secret oaths ; that it belt! .no midnight meetings at which, the .Scriptures, were prolaned: or. ridiculed ; that. it had ;IQ( Capled to be purchased for. the perpose of enforcing its doetritiesl that it had no correspondence or connexion with env other So ciety whatever ; that it -heti nothing to do with . , . . • • arty trattnr's th a t the vet r pled;:t OPit at le•ist as far ors ialnte,l lu the Uni o n Society ut Nor‘‘ich, OA! Committee hmi hey o ctittipWtt lv du ct-kW, And than he Was fead V to to !limb the Meta • hen's" of the :ktlutinktration or the House with any proofs whirl' might be required to corroborate his statement." The llou. Gentleman then said, that he thought the statement in this letter de served implicit credit'. If time, were allowe d he had no dalbt 'that many more statements of the same (dud would he received from different parts of the country ; and even fromiyhat had already appeared, the Report or the Committee us as more and more weakened every day. Indeed nothing Gerold surprise him more than the unallilll4yof the Committees. • Mr. W. Smrro rose for the purpose of corroho. ratiuz, by his testimony, all that had hero said by the Hollow able Gentleman who spoke last, as to the respectability of the quarter from which he had received the letter that bad been read to the House. lie had hithself also received a letter to the very same purport.. Nothing could exceed his surprise at finding in the Report alluded to any imputation against the Union Society, the objects of which were well known to he of the most harmless kind, and its views solely to promote the cause of Constitutional Rearrrn. Mr. B. BaTuuasT observ.d, that as the Union Societies were not mentioned in the Report of this House, all that had been DOW said respecting them, did not apply to any thing d?the .or in tende~d to be done by the House. The Commit tee atlas House did not conceive that there war, any thing particularly mischievous in the Union Society of Norwich. Mr. HA RYE!. Y rose fair the purpose of saying that he knew Mr. Edwin(' Taylor, of Norwich,. who signed the letter which had been read by the Hon. Gent4man (Mr. Coke), to be a most respectable • man, who, though he might differ itl opinion from him (Mr. Harvey) on pylitical•subjects, yet Le was sure would be one of the last men to attempt, by means of any club or otherwise, to overturn the Constitution. , • Mf. TIERNEY said (as we understood), that he had been prevented from attending the Secret Committee at its last sitting, otherwise he would certainly have proposed, that before they pre sented their Report to the House, they should have,communicated with the Committee of. the other Utilise, and compared their reports and evi dence. A$ it was, eve, y thing. that had come out respect to the Report of the Committee of the other [louse,, furnished the strongest argit• men; for delaying the Bill now in progress. For if the evidence was offered for the pitrposeof prov ing &it there was a mistakein the Report of the Committee of the House of Louis, that was sute- an argument for tirbiy, till it should 'be see whether there was any mistake in the Report of theCommittee.ol. this House. It was above Ihings necvssiry, in a case of the present kind, hat it sintithl- he nt:certaineci whether there were ny mistakes, and of what kind. It it boil a ready been discovered that a mistake had•hey lade one instance, ten more might , he consi ered as include,4l'in, the sweeping accnsatinn con tained in the Report alluded [loose cool, not reasonably pail such Kl3lll in the fats: of sod a mi.itake. Sir JANIES MacisusTosn spoke shortly in. the highest,terms, as to the respectability of tile per son from whom the letter came which had been -earl to the tionse Mr. JOHN SMITH said, that the Report •cone inel an imputation of the most serious kin against that part of the - country which htlind the honour Nto represent. It would therefore he' ex tremely.strange it time was not allowed for an opportunity to spew whether such an imputation was .true or tint. He had no doubt, tfint if the Bill for suspending the Habeas Corpus Act were not hurried through the :Honse,• he should have to present to v the Home a-petition from several thousand persons against that 13111, He then made Nome observat ons on the general impolicy of that - lie had no intention of casting any impu tation against the Members of the Committee, who were all -nersortsof big!). consideration in that House,.and of great consetinence in•the country. But at the same time, when he was called upon as a Member of Parliament, to agree -to a - measure which :was to suspend, for four months the hiker-- ies of the people of England, lie could not con- . . scientitnisly agree to it merely on the Report, no. fro m any confidence in the , Comtnittee. who frame( it.. Much had 'been said abotit the Spenceans.- They had been represented, as a thtmerous and dangetous body of .men, whose principles were widely. disseminated. It so happened that he,. as a Member of what was called the Spitalfields Committee, had aft opportunity of examining 'very closely .the condition: and habits of rite lower classes in the eastern part ' the metropolis, where he had witnessed.seenes of the most afflict ing kind, . lie had during his inquiries, frequently asked these unfortunate victims of the distresses of the times; but he had not met with -one of them who professed the Spencean doctrines, nor Who. had even heard nf'them, except through the neWs:' papers, and when they had heard of 4hem, so far, even under their excessive distress,.frOm adopting these wihl doctrines, they: universally treated them with derision. Upon the whole, he really could not give credit to that part of the Report w hich represented th e s e principles asso widely diffused ; tool he could not help thinking that' all that was said about the Spencuan system (to ,u4e a vUlgtit expression) was met ely lamilmg:—(A As to the proceedings on the 24 of December host,. no , man could think them more, criminal than himself ; he , thought the individuals con cerned were guilty of high treason, Jut the nlie. could not think -that there was any serious danger to he apprehended ,from an: insurrection which broke out at twelveio'clock in the day. The Re port of the Committee:might be right .as to sonic individuals:, but he denied that it was true ttis applied to any large - body of the people, although in fact, it libelled the whole people of 'England; for it, Was in such, general terms that it might apply to ev er y part of the kingdom.e, lie was very munch surprised that a Report, which stated that extensive conspiracies .existed against private pro perty, should have taken no notice of the Lud , dices, who fottned one, of the most extensive and dangerous .combinatioos by which . the _right of property could possibly be menaced. The out-' - • ; ri..Zl?; coininitteA by t n,-,L,,,,A0 i.ppi o u , ii , ) , ~, niniterons or sit t n.leut; Ls' ' I 4 1 ...:4 ' wl:eii ii'ley were in their height, ll' , su i r"...) tile H a beas ,Corpus Act had . Igra O a : might have 'doubted whetherit.wasaut ces3ary. But in the t)reseet state of MT it appeared to hint 'qui!e anneceststf, til; lately been abroad, and during a " 9 " 1 , 1 .1 , a co mp an y of forei g ners, cow:oo4m' Constitution, lie had diappeneil marks as to the liberty of the reign Gentleman observed , tba' subject in England was not so of, since it could not be deni , coat! go down to the 11 0 " Se he pleased, art! induce it to si Corpus Act.--(I-rear, hear, tion).—To this be.(llr. S.) 11 Minister could do so iu any e-- was not 'an obvious nect'ssitY public opinion, or it would I majority. He therefore hope) of the House this night would nion was correct. Mr. LONG WELLESLBY said h serially from the lion. Gentlemt as to what was- the general 01) 1 ' concerning the Bill before the !leved that the public opinion W' your of that Bill. That. HOl said, that among the inhabit) be had found no Spenceans; inhabit) none of those who professed Ili pies would be willing to aiow. was no good argument to be detitites Gentleman's inquiries as to that psir a ti ' so , The CHANCELLORof the EXcOabsatii remind the House, that the (I"e' tit ' s it f. whether the petition should be broog'l!,ji Lortl Cocti RAN E said that be hail tec' ) : oo , ter from a person of the name vl.o'llolo (Heating the Hampden .Club At li et :, g i 04 1 ' 1 from the imputations in the Iteport" mittee of the ['Ouse of Lords. pit fi ti serving, T ti- ac: l , t ) ui-elt BROU G HA M 1 13 i e s: i i t t t i t: l is e t f s l e ' s a r i s e o s i t t l i a c i , il e 'el b i : 1 0 1 : b t eu tv 113 1 j i ,a 3g t CliO i l l 'il i ls: , ( l l l) :: ": : j e ti i ll i bi t nif4l' the Hon. Geotlenntn,(Mr. L..Wi'ilitisrfotlYherroClloll.- b th ri e ng li h o lg use t i p i n t i r u r n ie y d, i t )t he w ß io i n ll , t hen would perhaps prevent that 11011.6" 0 (0 1 pular a measure.--IA lattgli,i1;(113:1'(:',"Itirrls))1 tl it Would 'seen) front what had L' e s'i or, thisl i Ilan. Hill il Gentleman, ,,o 11y t f l ) a r t. t ll l n e p i s i t , : r p s os f e ll a ' 1 P re ,f the tranquillity of the country Agll' i t y l io oft; homerous soviet the Spencesni,it 0 10 1 0 t ;):l , l l e l r t i . i , r o e m se a & y o () f h b it e a v i e f n u il a ,4 i , ; " l l : -- l b it y ( t A f o c i t o:i e ' lg t r : : :: ) [ e -13 6 : :)1 :: I c i :. r " i11(11%4 hear 1 .. from the Opposition.), . 1 1 . 111 r, LONG IVEL LESL SY- eXpirilllei ' lie 0' 'rite petition was tlict) Oidcred t° , table. el • ,raare Sir F. R —URD&T'r /TM e.for titc p , , r i pe , : ,, s ier .1, setting,, Club a petition IrGui the I.J el ‘ i ciStlit itil ' i t hL' i l o i liv eY : i i e : : ' ll i r i ti t t i,, Cl eeici li ti el i t (l 'e :lt i o . u : C ti i ii l ) ; n i l i l itl. : . C .a e eAt i ts i ti il in l i t ' ) : to t i c i fEe k i : . t h i o l ( l i . ,i ' tl i t t‘ ttia l i i i i el l ei c) . t i tir ‘ ti a ce.t .l 4 ei tl t t oot, : i , g .s l (i f t ' iii. ) t ‘ : l i i ii. : D t ,,r tC u l l ' oi s t t : ( ) ; : ) y i yi fi , ' l l ts i . el t i i ii i i, i j il e i.,: e i: ne ,e4 l ; l : : : ;:l ri c a 44 : l.)) :l , l l f i t r e, l l : : : ,i ' nt f'i t i ff 3 i l, je : l o i ti ll :: i i: : ' co-ext , nsive with taxation,Paril:l""legi° )11171.et S ; 0,1.., , ,,,; '!'die Cli ANCELLti It Of Elle I.;Seil 01 ,o' I11:13 BM, 1 1 0 ': ' ftlr. M. A. TAYLOR rose to al 'r Of C. :ol i t l t t v .P a ' L l s i ll s ti e ‘i lc : It :1) 11 : 1 r da t s' ') ' : l l (‘ : v t :: l Y :e )s)r p sb t i l e ri lnpe I:e't ii . :: : : °S811; 1 11t : 1111 ) 111:1e1111: C °1.1:1' ' '' nii se - • . those n should be recorded than it's Ii ille'' influencing the. I-louse. I.l'e l'i dlctilf' ' , 1 0 °f:l - 11 1 danger was to be espec'--I 0, 1 1 • f r 1 al of the Spenceao doctrine§. , e t bA, / ilicle 'was..any man tvhu could Irclic:jory 4 or IV , as a dangerous and ex tensive c""',l, 0 0 0 ),,,, I" point or breaking out, h e Ivt'"'"e. (01.1% it person that, the ex ioina laws t 4 ' et ,i Ne ,), dent fur t h e s„ppressi„'"„ O f it hest,{)."l)4l.o`brit, prove this fiont what had been ' a V.,0 would remindrhin) that an ioptutrleicet;'pttsilr.A': ready bloke» out, and bad Ivy i lycr" 00 1 1 , 4 c laws already its force, been it) i l . 3 l o ift li r '' ,r ll e power ,w,hich the suspension 4 ', e 01 1 ~,, give to Ministers, were atich si tt ..0 1 °' ' , v er. 0, trust his. dearest friend with--the,Y„FaPoi, wou!tl not trust himself %vitt). i c t ro c '' ''' hat{ c' ' 1 case of Arthur O'Connor, vvli ° oal'" -: cPtlntry with the . highest rec°nltnitilnittlltt;, malty of the first characters in l';"'' lti ectl 1. others, that person had been inrr°`.,l, 1) 0 1 , , ( , 1\ , 1 ,, c • ' 1 • 1 5) family, and friiided '4llspiCit!flO ti`ii . • 1:a) had not the slight ot , t s , ' rat o:c`i 1 O'Connor was engaged it) the l l ' 4 l , 1, () 1 : aftet wards appeared lie - was implies. 10,v1Ii-1,,, was arrested in his (Xlr.'lVA 1 1"" se) ,. ; li iill t iIC ask Whethera •'I 1 stl4l''''.! if - A; ny 111411 ti c 4, 1 Nei 10( ).-:, of high treasou ?---(.‘ hitigh•)--: , hit s been in such a sitttation of life t"' t,-41i - ,or'' lli'"` ' 111 51 i wits not well known, and if tri e -, i , cif°, it Act had been suspended when l i iie re "lir et !licit he mentioned tool: place; t he 104:lip,' - probability that out mere stisplci°l 611 0 :-., . 1 d c°" p l y iif been dragged from his I s imi.y s t i i e pa 0 , 1 , riedelinite time. in vaio d" '', i , die: o ,ll,f, t " the laws, am! demanded a, tr . ' 6 ' : is 01 3 4 Of lirrrCillg hits innocence, 85 il' St ‘c v d rJo' s it 6, L ; for the snspension of the 1 - 14 1) '1 35 00 1 ' I ; le' away with the right of .trial ; In f 01';" $ ,:f 7 .4:i end to all the rights told liberties ° ,, o ste r o f r , t p for it placed them all wirhin di e 1 , 1 1t osO le o i t i: 'lister'. in '1794, when the son e r i d es' l , l ,,,l'i propoted had bet.), brought forwtl;,,ert IP i , 1 0 1 _,; the tvhole country and the Haase 1 c lit 1 1' 0 , , ,i , the dread of 'French principles; si i i i ‘ 13 ': f ell o r against the meas;ire was - cell 51 ":,, t igh„ ° 1 ''',/' snre that if it could Itave bleu 1/,',cjid°l,lll.,'' tYlt at WEIS p r oposed could ha%e -w" ' e sti!" j precedent, in such a case ss•t lle I: 1. 01.0 1(1.' 1 41 1 0 r ~e ~ r amity then would have been to that 11 0 0;4' . IVIF. IVy ND 11 ANI QblN li6.l(ll,:i.tlicC°::o.o4t:/,‘ is:ecnitioYnnefdtilicuPtchreitilitiseri::rit),i-c:llir'el (11 : :: , ) ;(5 b1 '1'1 ) : : I‘'l4 ci"ts (1011- ; the designs .aoll ° I I', !tad ° Q spirators - were ail that the l" l °` lsv 1 „I 10 0 0 ',, sti hiat , 01 , ' , at the libtr.lo ) riga 35 , %. ,r ieti Oita 14C: of CL ' ll 1 "” : iospcoll till 110 01 Ihe i ,I 1011 reP liC' ,!; , CiSe ill o':jii na Og aill Y b ' e bY s h v , 6l '''' 1 .d that 1 , 0 , 1 sltew that it ll' i ll i li i ; vi' l l ai c ei t .4 l t ;: s t i :n i s i: r i e s:'Lliiio e : f lllc i ' a i :l , :r i. : llc' i tilbs. t jf'g i l P h e i ll a : i lrt ,,k 6:: t l4 : .. then), 0 011 tore(' f'°'n