The Sun. — London, England, 1817-06-04 00:00:00

oklutp of l7ltlalisl, whnin the Noble till ettibejlteAs pa! , tot-elly and politically. Nothing conic! he more mit'onnded with resp,et to that worthy Prelate, than the language w4lich it waq said had been at. Whined to him by a Rev Prektte, in the reported rp ee di to which he referred. In this it was averred that the Catholics of Ireland had; on one been advised by him not to think fatt het of ou•itioning, but to rely nil their awn •numberS j th d tirtir owl) strenuth.,. The Noble Earl, in 'Ve with!!! suck idipetation, :described the charat let o sodorl Archhi,shon Tryty to he, of Yii 14 a nit nre, as rendered it morally lot posA ihle hnt•he coold ottcred sach a•sentiment and, after adverting to the danger of such assertioits gning ik. , penied hlt his obliTt was werchy the vi ti • dication of so excellent ami laudable a cliardeter. Thr g 4 101) of •Ossolefexressetl as siint,ere revard for the' character of Dr. Tray as the Noble ratel; . and stated, that the expression imputed trt him, with resite,t to Dr. Troy, hurl never Callen hunt hi. lips. His Lordship was proceeding to state, that the rnint ttf time in the debate alluded • to by the talohle woe when he (the Bishop of Ossory) was answering a Hight fey. Prelate, whom he considered tn, have asserted what was unthriatian and unconstitutional. Lord fitteLateb anoke En order, observing, that though the coortesy cif the Home allowed to Noble Lords to explaiu any misrepresentations . that had occurred of what took place, in a former debate, it was going beyond the line marked out virtu welt occasions, to animadvert npon what had hero said by others,- particularly those who were not now present. The Lunn CllAKentot ngreed in opinion with the N o bl e L or d, a nd db,ereed, that if they were to enter into discussions with respect to What had been said in Newspapers, regarding what had passed:in that onus,:, he c till nor see•where it was to end. fie himself had been grossly slandered in the uewspapers these three days, but be should he wdoontol of himseit if lie were to take notice of it within that House. Lord tint.w:b said, he had no wit't in what he said to prevent the Eight Reverend Prelate from eapl , tioing what he thought rtecsssary, Y withre=re bard to his own speech. The Bishop of Oi‘Ory was about to rise again, to' there being a cay of No, no, his Lordship .did nor persist, and the conversation entled. ROYAL :tr,ESsactr..—STATE: Or. THE COUNTItY•-•HA.- ULM COII.PEIS SITSPZIVSION. Lord SIT)MOLITH delivered in a message from the Prince ile,kent, which was as figll6Ws " G. P. R.=—Hisitoyal Highness the Prince Regent, acting Sit the name und on the behalf of his Majsony, has given or. ders to lay before the House of Levis papers containiog in f.rcaation of the continuance of those practices, meetimr, and combinations, to which his Royal Highness theught it .proper to 'call the attention of the House of Lords at the. cavalaiencentsot of the present Session. of Parliament, and shoving that theseractices arc still catTicd Olt la different parts of the enuntey, in a rammer and to an extenstateulatea to disturb the public, tranquillity, am to endanger the seca• lit; of the constitudJual rstahlioinews of th e e mpi re , Hi s Highness ncornroends to the Must' of Lords to take tiais measure into itofaimcdiate and serious consideration," The Message having been read by' the Lord Chancellor, and again by the Reading Clerk at el s e Tabre . --* Lend Visconnr. sirnnotyro observed, that it was with a. very painful feeling he brought. tiovto a IMessage pf stich.a nature„ but lie trusted their linrdships woold do bin) the justice to believe that it was only, the stlongest sense of duty that could have prompted the advi3ere of the Prince Regent to etattncil his ,Itiyal Highness to send down such a 'Mesaage. It was for their Lordships to deter-. mine *lost course of proceeding should be adopted with regard td the .Message. They lenuld pro bably not object to his first mot km for an Address to the Prince Itegeot, thanking iris Royal fligh tless for his comtatutication, and deelartug their intention of taking the !topers into their imme diate and serious consideration be trusted elan that they would not object to the.motion which he afterwards intended to make, for referring these ptpers to a Committee of Secrecy. His Lordship then moved an Address. Earl CrteY wished to knew. what precedents there were for proceeding upon a Message the same day it c,nne down to' the House ? Lord Viscount SIOMOUTH said there wore nu merous precedents.for an- Address of thanks being Moved on the same day that a Message was brought down, which pledged the House to no. thing specific, * Bid GREY shirt he did not object.to an Address et 'Thanks, but he %visited it to be understood that' he did not thereby pledge himself us to any ulte rior proceeding.' The Asitletss is as agreed to. Lord Viscount Sib/44 , 1.7TH then said, that their Lordships hating pledged themselves by their Ad dress to take the iolurtrea , iun communicated with the Message into their immediate iota serious con sideration, be ti listed they Munk' not now object to refer the papers ,to a Cnrnmittee of Secrecy. He was 'tot aware met any precedent - in the books for acting in this way opolt is *Message the Same day it was brought dowu to the Hottse; too hes:twit° lea Son hy, upou such act oceasioa, they should not make a pteeedent. The only object of alloWing eft Ilitervkli.helWeell the teCeipLUl a Ittiyal Message a nd adoptiog any prticceding upon it must have been, that I he' House should not be taken by stir . }tr ixe. .i t the present instance ample notice h a d beet) given,. Isle Noble Friend (Lor'd Liverpool) , having intimated more than.it week ago, that a 3leasage to this elect .ttoold probably come down to the House. . saw, therefore, no western why there sbotiln now be any delay, and he intended co propose that the papers which had beet) ready Si) present should . be reterten to a •Comtnittee of Secrecy. was propoaed that. the Com m ;ti ec .which sat ,t he early, part of the Session sumo lee revived (without resorting to ballot), with liw .exception of one Member, the Noble -thlke (for whom he had the higheet respect) who Won ill health had been toteble to attend the tomer Committee, alai who nosy Whdied to decline at. tending nit the revival., of the COMMitter. His , Lordship 'concluded icy diet the. Popers be refereed to a Comntittett, the tesett of tit; hose itt &Aid, lie diti flit prttotot te, Anti- Earl GREY oh , erved, that the Noble Secretary otState had in fact admitted there were no tilt'-• cedenta for prtweeltiug ttpnW>i Mess:•ge the same day,lt was brought frown •to the Houst. - The ,Neible Lord had that they might /flake a pre -eedent, and this he (CordOrey) athnit(ed, hut l et it be proved that for to doing there was an indis liensibla public necessity, with a view to the pub lic safety ; and. tv'here in this rase was tea proof Undoubtedly ttie Gnus prabandi in this ca s e did ti nt t i e on Sl;ose who opposed this procecdiug, to she* that tittle were - Ho precedents ;' but it l-ty upon Who- toocrd -at proceeding, tU shew that there nes tt strong and over-ruling - necessity for it. Aceordiug to all rite informatiOtt he had liven enabled to 0 1 ;.:aia, the state of the country Was not •such as 't hosc tvilt) advised the bringing down the Message would (levier it ; on: the con trary, he briiervd there was nothing in the state o; the country that called for the renewal of thnie strong measures that bad been enacted in the early part of the Session, and certainly for the , distress that existed in the country, the renewal of the Suspension of the - Habeas Corpus was not the remedy. fie trusted, however; if the Committee were appointed, 1114 r, as he had before said, they would anxiously weigh and sift the evidence sub mitted to their examination, in order not only to avoid those et rors into which they had fallen upon the former occasion, hut that they might not upon doubtful evtdence make statements that could not liorne out. He trotted they would took well to the characters of the persons frotn.4o6tris the• evidence submitted to them came, and that they would estiMate with a jolt suspicion those, who whilst they affected to support the Government, lost no opportunity of inflaming the pessions of the people, as it suited their purpose. His Lord ihip here read the following hantl bill which was circulated at Norwich during the r ecent Election for Norfolk " ENGLISHMEN. s , What ha., canned th• high price of Bread ? " lins.-Tug Coior BILL ! .6 Who o'ided that unjust and crnel measnre whith grinds the poor industrions man to the earth, and entails misery on his starving family and helpless children ? , " Ans.--Tire man who tikes the Freeholders of Norfolk by the nose, and leads them when and where he plums. " Who is it that has lent all his aid to crush the little farmer; that noble and virtuous independent Member of So tiety, by the incorporation of his little property to swell the al: eady bulky estate of a slavish tr3nt's ? " Ans.—The proud and unfteling Despot of Norfolk. " Who is it that by the enormous and'utensice ink , of ma chinery, not. only in agriculture;: lint In. manufactures, has reduced.thonsands to a state of pauperitM, madness, and de spair, which hare lel to the commission Of crimes; of which humaii nature sliuddvrs ? _ " Arts.-44 who fu es to himself the rsarite, mid style of Pa tribt, 'stud who wiilics still further to liooilwint and enslave tilt men_ of Norfolk.. • • 4 , 4 Shall this systein have no ? Are thttfeelings of man. filed further to bi traurpted on ?No " 4rise, and do year Duty !" : What could evince greater Atrodiy than this pro duction, what more decidedly proclaim chum: prin. ciples - of anqrcby which had bee n de nounce d b y the Gore d roment, and yet this very hand , bilt had 'been circulated in 'support of "the Gip:eminent, and in favour .of ;he Government, Caodhlate. ,6tul he understood it was the production of the hest' of the Brunswick Society, at Norwich, with whom the . Noble Sect every of State, through his tinder Secretary, had held a correspondence, in'which he declared the Brunswick Society to be a highly Loyal Association. This same Individual too, he understood was the author of that information communicated to the Committee in the early part of the SeSsion, with regard to the alledged &st en, a .of Sedition: Societies at Norwich, which was completely disproved by the Grand Jury there. It was against being imposed ;you by the pretended information derived, from such characters as these,. that he wished to warn and caution the Committee. If the Committee '‘ecre to be appointed, be was happy to !tsar Out the ballot was not. th be resorted to, becatise he was an enemy to all hypocrisy, and he thought nothing more hypocritical than to pretend that there was a free election by , ballot, when it Was perfectly welt known that, in point of fact, a Comnaitlee so chosen was appointed by the Ali• nisters. With regard to proceeding at all now, nothing had been mged .to prove to him the ne cessity for so doing, contrary to all precedent, stud therefore he should mote to postpone the con sideration of the Message sill Thursday. He thought, however that no proceeding might to be had till the trials for High Treason had taken place, from whence evidence might be collected more to he relied :Trill than the information laid before the Committee. The'Earl of Lzvauront denied that ii bad been: admitted by his Noble Friend that there wt re no precedents, his Noble Friend hoviog Merely:stated that he was not aware of them ;.—and upon this •point laa•must contend; that there wo so.) groonit for the plea. of delay, there being no pretence For saying that the House was taken by sur'prise, had given Hot* Of the Mesaage last fridaysen. night, that it was not brought down list' h't !trey arose from an event that was not foreseen on the Friday preceding, in consequence of which it was posfponed till this da'y. bll3, in poitit, of f act , there was a longer notice given than had ever be fore been the case with regard to a Alessage; and added to this, it should be recollected that ity va3 distinctly contemplated at the time the Habeas' Corpus Suspension Bill passed through 'Patn a ., mo l t In the course of the present Session. Un doubted!). it wits only it strong sense of duty, connected with the most' important considei s . Lions of the public safety, that coold bare indoeed Miniiters to advise the present MeSSage. With, regard to the bend-bill read by theN'Oble gni, be as much as any than , detested attempts made to flame the base Tossions of the people, Ott w ever side they were attempted, whether in sup. „port al Government itt` itt it)4o#lottoo an d lie trotted the case elluded to ti; -, the Noble Earl would he a lesson to others on whatever side of opiniott,'not . to.resort to such means o f inflaming the public mind.— As to thf! Cututnitteei it bad beery i perh*ps, more faltiti 4 (CnfnpVlSillg tfollte Lori; blinding chit 4 relftly upon subjects generally) titan any .ether Commit tee ever before formed in Parliament , anti the Members of it were unanimous iu the , : ltvirort ; which Repot had, ii all its m terial points, been accurately confirmed. Ile therefore saw oo reason whatever for impeaching, in the fliglifeat degree, that I nor conic! he tlis cover any solid reason why the House should now refrain, after so !Ong a notice, from acting *spoil the Message brought dUwii this day, and refer ring the papers communicated with it to a similas Committee. Earl GaosVEgOR anitnadvetted upon the express tlisacquaintauce of the ,Noble Mover with anypre cedent whatever for the course which his motion called upon the House to athyt, and contended, that as that Course was contrary to established practice, while it was wholly uncalled for by ally valid plea of necessity, it ought not to he acceed ed to. The danger, indeed, ofagi•ecing to a de parture from precedent. in this case was the more dangerous, because such a•departnre would serve to create a precedent for the future, and of this precedent the worst use might be made : for should a Minister heteafter arise, entertaining a desire to carry arbitrary power to the extreme, he might avail himself of this precedent to take the House by surprise, and without any warning, On sudden press for the adoption of a measure sub versive of the liberties of the country. - But while he thought the Noble Mover boOod to sbew that there was some'precederst for the proceeding which he - now proposed; he would not - be toulerstodsd so pertinaciously to , adhere to precedent, as to resist any deviation that justice or. necessity might ap pear to demand. to this case, however, be could not imagine any degree of justification of deport ing front the established practice of the House with respect to a Message from the Crown. Earl SPRNCRK sititi that the extraordinary no tification of the Noble'Earl butt certainly guarded against surprise. But be objected to the 'Avec dem. Would the notice of.the Noble Earl appear upon the Journals ? This . was the great ()angel— (Hear, hear !)- , -1-le 'had taken no share • in the proceedings on the kite Report, and he bowed to the authority of some Members of the Committee, whom he most sincerely respected, without being himself Convinced that it was necessary to adopt the measure then proposed.. Subsequent eircom staeces had even increased his doubts. He there fore joined in the hope of his Noble Friend {Earl Grey) that the Committee would weigh well the evidence before it ;- it being intended to propose a renewal of the existing Bill fo: an indefinite time, and during the recess of Parliament, and trusted the Haase would net with de:liberation and circtonspeettion,' - and not go beyond the absolote necessity of the Case. The-Marquis of BUCKINGITAM said, the ques tion was, whether the Committee-way tote ap pointed now or at A flittire (1511% Stith 'MIS the proper footing upon which it stood, It wet pro perly remarked, that each of these points should be allowed to remain iipou its grounds, tri:hout any reference toTreeetlent. What was now their situation . ? Were:they to jo,!ile wt u there Was 0 necessity-for the communication from ?Le. Crown ? The reason offered against appoint.:,g the Committee on the state day the Address WAS presented was, that the House may have t; , oeto judge wh e th er a p r i ma / ode case of neeetiity was enable out. , That case had, iM his opinion, been made out by their ftrrnier .proceedings. When a Message was brought from the Crown, stating, the' existence of serious dangers, they shonld ant be so curious, with respect toLprecedent as to pre vent an investigation from being gone into im mediately, It - was the duty of the House nut to lose a turnitent. 11 no necessity e xist e d f u r mea sures of precaution, those measures ought not to remain in force at' all but Isbell it was stated that such, necessity existed, no . tittle should be lost in ciamining into LOrdIIULLAND trusted his Noble Friend would not be offended' if he regretted the impatience ma nifested by hint for a measure went to Cts pew! the Constitution. He admitted there was Ito surprise —the whole machinery laid Itliciently open—but still he (Lord' Holland) docked- much of the irregular l'indariek mode of treating mere dry precedents, which scented to, be the favourite and professed style Of the Noble Secretary. An allosion Was made to his amendment to substitute June for July in the MI. But his object then was not early consideration, but to make the dura tion of arbitrary power one Month less,—(Hear, hear l).—He was surprised the Noble Earl and the Noble Secretary were so silent 14)911 the persnows who were 'supposed to have or ted the Norwich haml47ill. The reason .was ohrions. it was not said the Noble Lords opposite knew any thing of .the hand bill, but that those who were supposed the ant hors of it had sent information to the Home Department'. • The Marquis of BycluscmAst, eaplnnatlim, said, Itls tittpaticitee ivas Owing, not to his wish to continue the Act, but to tnquir e wh e th er was or was not necessary, !mil 'if th e tatt er repeal it.--The Motion was then 'agreed to. - 'Lord Stnstoortt theta proposeth he-names of "tile Committee es before, with the vxeeptimt of the I)ttite of Bedford, for whose :inure he proposed that of airl 'Falhot . Earl GttgY, after a few words,' proposed the Earl of Rosslyn. The intme of Earl Talbot .. ivas 11: en rallst:lnted for that ot at Bedford. The Bill TAN'titlroot. said, 'that ttt the com mencement of the Session, a c(►mintiniclllo,lw3s made to Parliament relative to t h e state cut tile country, and if it was in the judgment of t 1, 1.e Ex ecutive GOVt!rlitlierit tri make A lof t her'terort the course of the ',Seision, the most adviseable mode . of proceeding Was to ' , revive the for.oer Committee-, sal theinostlikely to execute Ole ties eotrusted it) it t)". the House. :A No .-le Lor.: WO now prciposeti to be a 'member of the Cciti • inittee, and he saw no person more comi,elcilt fear tbat situation. Earl 614:Y moted, name that •the . n ae of the Lord- Chancellor be left resit of the CoMmittee, oti ).Ic count of hit many other avotiationi, and that tlie, name of the Lail of Rosslen be substituted in hi , • stead, • l'his motion was put from the 'Woolsack. erd negativeft. Ti te House then approv'tti Cointl)ittec, whicird,:wrsists qf the lime Nitit;ber sts *vete appo:bieri at lite corittiOnee ment Session, with the extcptiott of -1;A:11111bf.)t, a fills the place of the Doke of nedforti. sT.ar, ritIsONERS IN IWAIN.SIIIRE. Lord Llot,ea,D brought fortcarathe inotioti, witiehhe had given noti ce re lative to the C Ouila of the SteretaTV of State, in interfering tviill'l' ditties est the ..logiitrates, of ilerOire, sou II j eta from visiting the Stale pr iSifiltrii' ' prevent th Reading jail. It was, he s ,,iti, a w aiter ef ill'"' 3erions conseqttence for a Allinistrt .of the tol to fu se upon himself to interpret the 1004 the Country, am; violate the procisiont It positive et of Parliament. lit the yea k .c ' Itft Act had been passed, which declarei a,,, Magistrates bad a right to visit ptionecil' all jails ; h•st iiere the litllgistrates il ( . 1 t ; lion were infortuzd that theY most n ett l'i'illor State prisoners. file observed, that hp Itic , 0 Bill' for an,pentlingtbe atheas Collets Act) ! 04 Secretary of State bail tile putter = I ilaPr i i o , any person, on information heiog g lycol° kid and keeping such person in prior); but Le tic no tight to be the exponittler of the la"' b o should ',thew that the Secretary of Et 3 441 gorse beyond the line of Ilia duty whets 441 Answers to the questions put by the MAKi li ' i l l Berkshire. [Here the Noble Lordreaileverio ' different questions put by the Magistrates,sL, answer of the Secretory of S tate, $ u:1) 0 isig!; t 4 , already before the public.] Several o f the at'li, were extremely harsh, particularly that triticl)s4 bite(' It sta‘c .Prisoner from reatlit,tg a ''''.. s 7,P ot ifil and several ot ler, regillet ions laitidosr,a "'"v ho b to the treatment of State P.iioner s ‘" .. r , e i mia and unlawful.. At the lime of .tite.llervi'bops h. 'giant, the fi rst right &planer(' 01',44..0 iltaio":l6a tsel:!byltitlit'e°tNboehltei istPtetir7le, dbywtietbitiiii)a::::,:t,:isig::4llel:lltlrft:: they were not to do that %shies illy P e ,f,:: ; ,o ' or the Country enjOitted them to eo. _.,;;',„ a poht Which it was ti....: dbuty of quire into; lie thereforemoved that 04,eorxig before the flottse * corl nf the roil l 'i r fele which took place between the Justices 0 shire and the Secretary of State. 1 it. ble' Lord St Inr.arcin-rta aisuttel the. {lota e 1 !'',l,i , g" charged. against him had beersdoo 3 ` Af til s g ur a e. c eg t l yi r t ie e t i l u i t r i i rli m tilk o g e f , r 1 1 1 1 1 : t e e . l i t 4 l , l . t r l i ne7itccttindqrspsl'orfe'f l i t:o: t :re l :::: b ll : e c : :i j i , ' c l li r : .spousibility .from himself. As I° ,f ` ihe ct 4 (19 " e, Ite! always troderstood the i1t.e.,7. StO prisoners were 41w:lts cOntrairedto.„ 0 : e I'l anti if they bad been etwri;!ied t v , 1 1 ,040,:! r ; C9uncii, the St!cretary it or State 10' 1 , l''' lr" hall been the practice in the titte r° if , r eti': and others, who refused Stgle rt,l/",n;,, Fcril the lo,tift ci. : iiiriti t c: o lco ; - I,4;t t: tiiebrt flout it, : , l ,o p l ,4. ' " ri ' e f il: ,,,, t ,i4 t i .; l n i c il t; t r ib,} e ::s4 : i f . la l t st a l :e.. )l 7 l l. l l; r l(,, Ci o l t it i, ! : l l., 6 el l i) l l, l }, e ;e rr e l : 11 c,:r .1. 14,it i1 :1 : : 11 1 :1 3. ,. ' 5 ' Sign Itt'sEt their relatives, or a l l ( I. t ae' ivt .,% , , i rHe therefore contended that the P* o folly " - ai l ranted him in. the s:cps lotelY.l".l“,'''fricao"l:". cessary tigonr, he eisintainell, !,•"10...b, 1011',! s tate # ;..olle it: ~e a" , i B,rrri:y. Tlie- power ..5504.01 .0( 1, " $. ( , :t t 7' l a t ' ''rt l ' a r ! r Y' e lti i i-l' 1 :°: 1 1' N" : i f('1 1 : l i fiSt g l ) (k4 b )I . 1E 1 ti e :lbact‘Ye. 'rel l, ::': : :.11 : 17s; ( : l i cl ic I°ls7e'ir'ltt.:ll:cilerti:Y,ll d.ritii:'l'l:l'jtie'i`c;e:ttt'rilla:4;slb4r:o:llllili'll'te:: ;.;:te.ltifi:'' *the king's gaols, :anti that the nid6ritoti clEe• his prerogative over ad St 3 in : t r i oesl'l l ' l, .. fitted in those gaols. This set=!wool' „riiloil " ~,,-. - As tit the a d‘iCe 13 r ty 0° ;I . o s law talkers of the CriliVri, be tvott it so, in ;t. lion to any such op o f vri'ecni,,,,l;AK't'it: opposition to a p.,)sitive Act ("t` tbilitfOlii,i' could not see, that to rctio ir i f ~1 2, 3 :- id l'Ille't! tai: won'tl argot n wan t_ o f tont...--c°i4 sattt.- ters of the Cloven ; our affi li4 1 ,;40, ft s bc ot t ny i irr i t : n t l i t i e l( h ;:t ei t e i ti t '- i ej t or q l : i o 'se r e t :l' :} l : .;:es ti t : e:tt::: : :‘°'l::j:l:l;cc r 3!)freub;.4llll.°oeil.. be set up against tile I,:w of the : , ; I . h e 0 09 0. 'ilf-h4ttl.l,ee constitution a'oulti Heo.,va ' , . The Earl of LIVE3Vbin. OPPsl:\figiOe'lit..' prerogative Ot ill, n'a, .0. tending to_ throW at Cc tiSttre 011011.14.,, 1)0 5 ... 1 : . Act which" Arus not only instill." ' 0 pr eit'" . . legal. There wilt Ito law Which ,5 the crovtli.. ' Intl exercise.of the prerogative Q i , rolv oi ol ;i, ' it Was an essential port of that .1 ) f i ' li( ;„ o f at' I . the entift: Illtitligeoicot sell reetott, ~I ti e to ( , ::, Prisoners. LAI' La HOSSLYN SilliP"r,'l.o V , d i . ~ell.R it:lll,e . MC LOUD CfnANCBl.l..f,ft • W's, r i t, E , '•_., t i • st"el. that in IV;ltit be Was .' 1',,,' iog 10' , ' should not be considered as pl,'"c Sibis'loany opinion hereafte.rii tti::.B-'01:7 1., 1 . 1 : i r ,t i t. sent tli3(.ll3Siati, a legal I ) t'° . o , as 3 „.0 of the very act whirl' 8 c aw.; ri :D or . Place, and that their Liort!stor, ii,Li,o.. hair 14) it Jsiti.scsitlicace,astiesi.g3iiittintsylii).),titi,arttiecl:s' .:31,,te 0. t.100,1,?0[,,,i. ~ti Lord (11,,Iland) hati,founti the;s:ll 14 ,, of :, wil4 dial t:.ey n or ;eel: 8 tcoloi}:v ,li,c,it'.r,l I`;,,iiie Lord wishi:fi, :o correct A.);01:7 i r, g 5 1 ,1 ", ,,, I e, 4'. ny dist_ tic floc ;mce ti- 1 . ) : ..r ,i , Itaa'o:. ili.st ritpoSe; but 1 . 0 'siting' for 7: ceo ore . , the peesent. impiki !Ile, a , V 2 't" ' n.,,,,!1 ti , , ' O ll EXeCtltiYe GOieT:inr4tt , " .4 1 .I, 1,0'011,0. tt'nt thc nrer,g7v.iv(.s of the COI; ~0-', v"i'l. No Act of Parliament. cool 1 ,`..'i4olif i,,.. the ACE 'Vt6 "1,, OFI ;7rert,g.t; i N c;5, tilt'' , b 5, .-- . , . 11 1,1 oat prc that tt certain pcerPOlive.s°:eriaioly de( . 0 ei.",l he Act of 170 1 I,i-,ll,,istrjte- , hat' ' iv e„.eneral terms. tht , t - tie , i' t.i._2l. if it o'o 4 , 0 ri'; it/ visit prioncrs in gaol! . i _ l ! . ` lt 11,,y pers',,,,,• Towttive 0 1 the crro.vit tO pi r . .. , -: . _ 1 ,,„L , c ) „ iloi.tr, .. A i having access to a ..7'" = l' sil o io eiC!;ol.f. itCotall not be art...c0:41 bY, ~torqr,ol , Fire, he co:Ile:I.:0i tl"" thc t.:c.l 4 l ;pti, ;Pr llP 7 '' . i htd done, , jitstiied itt wh,tt de . , .. 0 . , 0 0, 1110 Iliollo . the iti 1 SOH. he shottlit 1 , ., , i' , - . - ... vo w , Of o wl' Eril SPEriCF,:t SllB.ke hil '4lbe f j oit sC ,_ ,§. A! test Si.tne time lie !Ought lotion 4 9 o e,d, Ire 411°V" • ( t i ,' i t l e i : r i t L i , Ir , 1 1C e l:: : i i I d o rt t ► i t r i. l i l e i t in i : L I 1 1 ; i: ' I t ' . 1 4 : 1 s l i : 1 v ) ;1 ; ti l rg: its : 1! :- :4: rep:tr c sf y t : I s) 13, : : ::: i a l t , ; Il i 1,1 .1 1 : ile:.s 1 , i o ; ii I: oi l 0 1 : 1 e 0. 0 I :: 0 ; ! I : frliOft O t , ~,,_OOO, several argumenra.m ';' ,000 ,,g t ile I u , w , pat Tile (1 cI r t ;tris for ac; s • 1 %lot i o n ival. 7 0 0,09 n eß.t!ired : ,_the mig": t ,re„o.Clocs„_ ,4jotri negatived. Adjenirtivi'l _,,,trirerrie Lrer The Ilchte ti thelieveava-er• of 1 i