The Sun. — London, England, 1806-08-11 00:00:00

SURREY ASSIZES. GUILDFORD, SATt7.RDAy,.A.JO."-g, DEFOAE THE Loßp c!.:ITF BARON.- CEfli. CON. -AND BICANIY. Eleanor Witie rd•,was indkted:for _that she, at Gretna,_ in Scotland,. inte;Tuarried with John . "Whit 7 . -ford; on the 25th 'of fNo;:ember, t aot, and after= wards. at the Parish . 0f..E.t....A1ury; Lambeth, in the County of Surrey, on 'the..l9l - ii of May, 1806, fe loniously..intermarried with Robert Jacques James, her former husband being still alive. This was a case which excited a considerable de , tree of interest, is it was - un:'.rstood to involve the regility of a:Gretna Green. Marriage. The Defend ant was a young Lady of handsome person and ele gant manners, and her appearance at the Bar eY.- cited . considerable sympathy on her behalf, in the speantors of the Court., After she was arraigned, arid had faintly uttered hor; plea of Not Guilty, Cultwoon rose to address the JUry. ,He be gan, by stating, that the melancholy duty, devolved' upon him, iiitich he assured the Jury be executed with most painful sensations, to crindua the prose cution against the Prisoner at the Bar, for a .crime, which,- if substantiated against *her, degraded her from her rank in life ; which the law: hat; declared a felony, and which might subjea - her to -be trans , 'ported from her native country, an associate of the •vilcst alzd- most profligate of mankind. The Case hid) he' nacho lay before -the Jury was of a most extraordinary nature, and differed very far from. the class of cases which usually presented themselves fur the consideration of- - a Jury. In general, those .who were. .arraigned for this critneyere of the lowest order of society, who had no knowledge of the extent of their moral duties, or of the consequences of deviating from them. Not such was the case of the Prisoner at the Bar, she hadhien well educated, and ought to have beer; refined to -a better sense of her duties, and impressed with. the importance of their observance: She was the daughter of a man Of KespeaabilitY,. and- of some • importance in the _town of Basingstoke, and in the year 1801 she was addressed by her husband, who solieited her hand • in marriage. Vor what reason, the _Learned Conn- Lei said, he , was not informed, but her father, at that time; was averse to the match, and :refuSed his con sent ; but the addresses . of the young roan were not disagreeable to her mother, and other parts - of the Lady's family ; but it being. found that no entreaty would sof!_en-the obduracy of . her father, the young Couple eloped to Saitland, and were there married, accOrding,to the forms and ceremonies of the Scot tish law. - Upon their return, they were reconciled to her father,'and - the husband commenced business as a linen-draper, at Soutl y mpton ; at that time he ~ has about ci.s years of age, and . Ae Prisoner- scarcely 18. They continued at Southampton until the year 1.805, when business not succeeding, he was obliged to relinquish his situation, and come to London., Here he certainly was obliged to -live on a reduced staler , He obtained,a situation as managilfg man at a wholesale linen warehouse in the City, and took a small house for his wife at Kennington. They re sided together, in apparent comfort and happiness, he going out early to his business in the morning, and returning home about t ight in the . evening.— They continued this course till about March "last, when one eening, returning as, usual, hefound that . another bed was putting up in a spare room ; and, upon inquiry, his wile told him that she had let this room to a rnot ,reSpeaable old Gentleman,- ;,kho had taken the Tooni'to lodge with them. ln the evening the new lodger made his, appearance ; he:seethed above CO years of age, and : of most .gentlethaniy manners, and was, therefore, ,gladly received by the huiband, as a welcome inmate. _From such a man he could suspea no injury ; and none but the most snspiciouscould have, thoug! - ithis ‘vile in danger•in; such society.- . Ho , dever, -sc.) it was', that after.a•very snort lime, he found his wife strang - eiy.altered in her. behaviour towards hirn. She, appeared disgusted' ..v;ith and miserable in herself.- lie entreated her' Co reveal the ,causeOf her uneasiness, and, then, ub doubt, to reveal Thor 0%61 guilt she iitfeaed to say, - that his behaviour ivies unkind, - and she had : ft , ..zNorrto - stispea: his fidelity.' Ile endeavciUred,. by every secthing.attention, and by increased kindness,. to convince her of her forming an erroneous opi !lion, and had. apparently succeeded, it — , on the morning' of the 13th of ,April,.wlien he 1.2 ft . _ they . paked with' marks of more than usual kind ness ; but it so happened, that being takenill - that dn,- he returned home mach earlier titan was cu s- • tamary. He found his , wifefrotn home, and on the mantle-pic.ce was aletter, addressed tb him, in her hand-writiOg, • to the following purport. i 7--" Sir, hive taken my own name of Miss HOWard,and shall . ever after disown that of WhitfOrd,.which I. am now fuily 'satisfied I never was entitled to ; Ithank Go'd • for it fur I hold it in utter abhorrenc e . - Ye s , sa id the Learned Counsel, no. doubt she then held it in utter abhorrence. While 'she was :nth:on taininate-k she held it not in abhbrience; bat_ when she- bad , . deviated from the path of virta.., she no: doubt abhorred the name of the man whom she had wounded with the most cruel of all . injaries.---• Shcs.did not return'home that night, but th e nes t - morning-her husband. received a message that she was at a neighbour's house, and desired to see hilt,. He accordingly attended, -and then she, exllibited -a gleam of remorse• for her misond - titlf.', When she saw her husband, she.exclaimed, " Whitf o r,d, y ou catmnot, w:-11 not forgive 1112, 7 '-Ilt that tirnothe did • not know the extent of 'his injury : , but she Ainnue diiitcly confessed that she,had dishonoar.O.hisbe, , l;' and complainc_ - 1 that .I;imes, Breit lodger,- had 'seduted her from her duty. All she requested waS;that her husband would rstore her to her parents, which,- not Withstanding his injuries, he promiseo6 would ' do. Of short, duration, however, . was 'her better. resolve ; and so true was it, that when the bounds of virtue were once transgressed, and the- mind. be-- came familiarisel with guilt, that it a&ed, without remorse, what in its pure state it could not con : . template without horror; for in a few weeks after this event, she publicly Married her hoary seducer and for that act she now stood wrigned as- a cri m nal at the liar of- Jus,tice. The Learned Counsel :concluded by stating, that he. should call his wit-:' nes;e to- rove ,his case. The punishmcnt, , if she was o Ind guilty, would be apportioned by the sg perior wisdoen of his 1.1,d,h 7 i! , j but tliere remained yet this consolation fur tilt' woir.;2nat the Oar, that she was'\ brec,i-e a Judge who always :iempered judginent With nier• . ..7. • - David ang, tile. well lalo,k bl:lckstnith 8, - or 7;7UCt-, ter, at Gretna Gi - een, caked. 'll:is-man, hav ing taken the Scotch cath, stated, that' he wifi, a to bacchnist. at Gretna, and lwd-been long in the habit of marrying persons who caul': to him. On he 25th of NoveMber,.. 1801, . he married ,the . Lady at the Bar and Mr.-WhitfOrd, necoaling to his 'pra:;iice. He was asked minty questions by the Lord 'cbie,f , Baron. ,Fie said he had no .written form ofl mar fiage ceremony, nor kept any bb - oks. There' were no subscribing witnesses to the Marriage in question. The only names written-on the paper were David Lang,',iohn Whitford, and Elizabeth Howard. The LORD CHIEI! B.aoN said, he would not,ad mit this as a marriage. Lie asKed him . what he was He replied, a tobacerinist. ilk' Lordship observed, that a fellow or two, like the witness, did these sort of-things; but botb Liensell and the parties were lia.• ble to pirinisbment. Mr. CURWOOD said, the rear ine was irregular ; but that did not vitiate it, though it subjetiett.the parties.to punishnient. understood:, by the Scotch law, there were two 1:)..(21(!s of marriages.- • .LORD CurEV BAtioN---‘'. I cannot iake your un derstanding of.the law of Scotland I must Wye it certified by the Lord Advoco.;e., or one of the Judges of the Court. There is,'no dwl'ot but a valid mar riage iu Scotland .or in China valid any where ; but the law of every foreign c()!lntry :Must be certi fied. If you have any ..-I'dvocaPe of, chard er I will receive his testimom-," Counsel---.A . Will your Lordship permit ie iL nes to 'give evidence. of the law ?" . LORD CHIEF iBARON_;" . " .No, certainly not. I will not receive 'the law'of Scotland front a tobacco- 'list. - The Prisoner Was acquitted, of course. . • Frederick Standen, tried for hurglariously breaking and-entering the dwelling-house-of M. Shipley, Esq; and stealing a variety of articles the property of Mr. Shipley, to whom he was servant, was thwl— Gui4ty, Death. There was another indiament for a similar offence in, the. house of Thomas' Parry, Esq. an East India Director, and taking away silver nuCkies., miniatvire pictures, and other valuable articles, his. property ;' but he was not tried on the setond! • ' George Cooper, a li;hterrnah; was indi6ted for fe loniousiy stealing _a large quantity of malt, froM a barge called the Atlas, the property orMessrs.,James and =%Viliiam 13Urges, :of Horsleydown, corn-iner c;3ants; A number. of ‘vitnesses were examined .for the prosecution,; who clearly proved the case, and the Jury found the . l;risoner Guilty . . • • The LottD. Ca; EF BARO previous to passing sen,: tence Of seven years .transportation on him, ,ob-• 'served, that. he was fully proved to be one o f those - deStruetive plunderers, who rob the mer cantile` intere4 'of many thousands annually ; it therefore becarne_necesiary to au exemplary pymishinent on all Offenders . , Who, laze him, were most justly tumid guilty by a jury of their country. Sardlt Johnson, Llizuvetli. Hitchcock, and Flowers, three paupers,.maintainedat the expellee of the Parish of Wandsworth,were tried on n india ment for robbing David Jerkins, a person brought, into, that Workhouse, of a sum of money said to be his propel ty. Sarah Brett, an approver, .deposed to the following effect.: she said, -that in thu early part of the month 'of April last the Prisoners and - herself were .Paupc; , S in the Workhouse of Wands worth Parish ; the d&eased David Jenkins, having fallen do%,vn in a fit, the DoCtor of the Parish saying he was struck with death, as he thought, sent hitn to the house td be taken Care of, mild sent also me divines for his relief; Mrs. Croft, the,Mistress.of the Wor,kliA;l3C, sent the hisunerJohnson to attend hint; Flowers and Hitchcock were in the room; when; little hopes of life remailiing,7.lohnson searched , the pockets of Jenk.ns, and took. Out his Money, Inch she gave to =Mrs. 'Croft, accounting to 41. Os. 64d. ; she bathe back, to the - rootn, and had another search, and fOund a clean titfocsilver, in a• piece of rag ; she expressed 'a wish to keep. it„ and, FlOir.ers most strongly fecOminended - a division of the property, as enough he said,,, had •beelt given to; the mistress ill reaily ; . ten shillings each. W. 13 shared at that a sero abiding piece was after,varth found, and ss, -inure were .shared by each, of whom the witness' was , one. , Mrs. Croft, :root the inebriated state Of the parties, suspeeted soniething was done wrong. l'he witness was called to' account, and she kel= fag a compunction for tree part she had aCtede re ttirned.whA motley she hadleft," and told the whole story : one of the Trisioners returned 45. 7d: and ,another. 3s. but Flo>eers would neither confess or return the Money : the man died - while theroperation, of picking his pocket the third time was perform-. Mrs. Croft and her daughter corroborated the evidence of Brett; and the Ji.lry found the ilirce Pri soners , . The sentence on Flower, was Seven Years Trans-- ponfation ; • the -two women, who are, one i3O, and' the : other 40 years of age, Twelve Months Hard La-', bour. . John Cowen was tried tor stealing two hampers, and_ two dozen bottles of white wine, the property of the Right Hon. Lord Ternpletown, at Betch.• "North, to whom h'e was butler. The Prisoner had Occasionally conveyed the' witie to a. neighbour's house, for the purpose of sending it for Sale to a house in East-lane, Walworth. On its.,passage it was discovered, and traced to the Prioner, who was • taken up, and committed,' for trial.' He was found aroivi Gulley and Charlotte Fisher, two strollers, were tried fur burglariously breaking and entering the dwelling : house of James Vidler, at Dorking, and stealing - varioas articles of linen. The Prisoners were seen about the place on the night (tlie 22d of. April) when the louse was broken open. Another house was broken open that night at the same place. They were afterwards traced into the Borough, where . it was proved they had pawned the ankles stolen from Mr. Vidler's house. Guilty--Death. Isaac' /Vickers was tried 'for assaulting and beating Wiliam Chaddick, a carter, at Peckham Rye-lane, and robbing hlin of a silver watch, and a purse containing a 7s.:iiiece 'and some siMx. Two wit „ . , . . "tivses who 'found Cbdadjs;li . , lying on the . giotilicl, by his deScription,, pursued the ,Prisoner, took hien. at Pecklmni, ftiund.. on hin the purse; and attar= wards found the watch iii a place here'the Prisoner cuntcssed he bad put it: The case b.eing , clearly _proved, he was found Gzfilty—Deao.—TheTrisorser was a - deserter frorn the Horse Artillery at Wool-, wich: Junes Harm :Alias Hyde, eras tried for stealing se veral bank-notes,out of a dwelling,iotr,:e., and found Thomas was capitally- convifted of slieep-. stealing. ' . 1,2-ill 7 .REPOT. COURT OF CHANCERY. 'Abc. g. BANKRin'T rrETITIONS. ' EX PARTE TAYLOR, IN THE 'MATTER OF This Petition, was presented by Taylor, • who was a creditor of Hibbert's, for having the Commission of - Bankrupt takenoui against him (Hibbert) super seded, ash for subjecting Mr. Barlow, the Solicitor eta' the Commission, along With Ilibbert- himself, ClutT, the petitioning creditor, and another person of the name of , Ogden, in payment of the costs of the proceedings. Mr. - SOLICITOR-GENERAL, in support of the ap... plication e 'read..several a ttovltS , Which - ixent :to shew, that hynnediately before the taking out of the COminiSsion, "Cluff.wascreditor of Hibbert te .L. the ainount'only -of bol. To make up the. debt to rOOl. 'Out? borreWed from Ogden 401. which he leet to Hibbert, who '"again: returned it to Ogden ; and, within three weeks of the time of the original loan, Cluff tuQk out a C.kionission of Bankrupt against Hibbert, representing himself as a crechtor.to the extent of took" &Aides the debt due to Cletf, the petitioning creditor, who, on its being shown fo' him that the 401. had been ;repaid by the Bank rupt to Ogden (a fat% of which, till after the taking out of the . CemMiS'sion be professed fo be ignorant), fipand that he could only claim for 601. the 'Whole dents claimed, were extremely netting, amounting to loss thae cool. of.course to less than the sum for which, as due•to a number of creditors, a Comthis ! sien of Bankrupt could legally issue. The Learned Counsel therefore maintained,. that the COM-mission had been taken out in fraud, and 'only - with the view of Procuring for the Bankrupt - his certiffeate::That it 'must be superseded, and that too at the expence of • the BankruPt, and of his coadjutors, Ciurf and Ogden, was without dispute... In the : eircumstances of 'the present case, where e however e there was little or no prosPeCt of the expences being recOVered from the petitioning creditor,. who had, himself sincebecotue bankrupt, or from the ether parties, the Learned ; COUUSQI submitted ; that Mr. Barlow; the Solicitor, who had taken ; out the CommisSion, and whose ditty it iivA",'lisSlig authorised tos , e6 cut the 1)r0- .- CCSS of tbattourt; to see that-'snelrprocess was eot *abused, was also liable for- those expences•lerhich had been occasioned by .iiis - own improper neg,le(tof duty. • It was:'eettainly the duty 'of a •Selicitor; be fore suing out a Conimission of Bankrupt, to inquire and be saft.;iied that there was a petitioning creditor's ' debt: ,• Had Mr. BarloW made the proper inquiry in this case, it was obvious that he nlest have found that there was no..rfal debt to the amount required, and of course the Commission would. not have been - taken out: It was impossible to deny that the Court had a right to say to those entrusted with the :right to issue its, process--" You have abused. - the right :reposed us you, and therefore you shall ,enjoy it no longer." In aSking of the Court to make , Barlow liable 'in the expenses incurre,d by the ins--; proper exercise ,ef this right,. the Learned Coun sel,:surely, sought . to subject him to less - severe panighinent than that df depri'vation of office ; and; 'if the" Court could inflict the harsher, it un .qhestiduably was competent to adjudge the. lighter punishment.. - . - Mr. - Coax; for Mr. Barlow, representc;l, that his client was a young man, the subjecting of whom in 'expences, in this -case. wohld , be 'to ruin him on his first entrance into lite. The petitioning creditor had stated-todiim, that he had a debt .against the Bank eupt to • the `extent required by law. No collusion on - the ;part of his client had been attempted to be sliewn.. It was, theref :re, going too far to-suppose himr. Conscious of a fe.c.t, of which, from every thing that appeared on his own affidavit, he was ignorant ; and, on. such supposed knowledge . , to subject him to a punishment not recognized by. the rules or, th'e 'The LORD CIIANCELLOR said, if he had seen any thing-in the affidavits for the Petitioner, which,went to infera knowledge, on the part of the Solicitor, *of an imperfe6t debt, notwithStanding his affidavit to the contrary, he should have exercised his own judginent on the, pi:obabiiity of the-two statements. 'Mere was, however, DO allegation of the kind .; but the accession Of Mr. 'Barlow to the fraud praCtised by the other parties was left to lie colleCted simply from the existence of such frauds in • them on whose representation he bars taken out the commission. He did not find it laid down in the, practice of this Court, that such a rule was to be taketelcr granted. 'IC he did, notwithstandin g the respect in which he's held the practice of other Courts, where a contrary. prevailed;- and notwithstanding the .disadvantages which' Such a,praaice' might, induce, lie should have given it full, countenance. . C3u the cOntrary, how ever, .while he 'had - never ,beard that in .i - . Court of Law an Attorney had been subjeaed to tltimages, eXpences, fee a writ improperly taken out by hire an inf7srinition lodged with him by his Client,. of the falsity ofwhach he wasignoraet, he was equally ti.• informed that such a measure of justice had ever been applied to any Solicitor of that Court impro- ' perly taking out' a Commission of Bankrupt, he be ing unaware that -every thing sworn- to vas not as it purported to be. ;It did not appear to - . his LOrdship, that if no debt but that of theVeti tioning CreditOr was proved, the - commission was, therefore, void. Any Creditorio the extent required by Law, was entitled to take out a .CommiAion for his own benefit alone. He did not deny that the Bankrtipt Law might be' Susceptible of improve- ment in this respect, but it was hisduty to judge of that Law as it stood. - It was not hiS lili.sh to throw • Impediments in -the' way of any pepon obtaining access to a Court-of Justice,"aed liewas afraid'corri plying. wit h. the prayer of the present Petition woul e greatlytend to produCe -this effete. The doors of Court 4 , l*6re :ttvzi);t.ciPen toe the rich, Le catte they cOulaTay..r.for_ the ! , ‘-c.ess to them which ciaiFti.Cl i what si:nat it;i l , ll Ower,•ttiust the Nor stftnd,'il, iit a:ldition to the disalvantageS uniier which they .At - present laboured, .their AttOrtrev had to speculate on the chAnce'of being subjected to the costs, to which they, from A . mis-representation of . their ease might live iilducfi:d him to subjea the . adverse party ? .His LOrdship; therefore, ~supers eded the Commission, at the expence of Hibbert, lutr, and Ogden ; rejefßing the application as to Barlow, but giving it . tb be understoOd that he should not be.entitled, out of the ikinkrupt Funds, to thc costs .f the Cur mission, so far as expended by him, but that, if already paid, that sum inlitt be restpred, it being necessary to give sothe.check to such proceedingS. Ex Piffle GENT,. imike,Matier ef ßittEßzDoa. This was an application- or• a similar rfatar., hi which Mr-Aryowsmith was the .Solicitor.` against whom, as well ag against- Berbridge the Bantrupt; Watts, the Peetioning Credifor, and Walsh, wiel had fraudulently joined ;vith,Bethridge and Watt 4 in a conspracy to take out the Commission, the ex= pences,of the Proceedn4 ; s were cra , ..ed. • l'lit SoLttirott-GENAL. and Mr...Gtumwooe stated, that.in a dui-Lim' to t ho . features in the Idr - tiler caie,. sonic ad:atonal circumstances here cccurred against Soliciter, Mr. Arrowstnitit.: The person who introkeed to him ,Watts, the Petitioning Credi for, was John Walsh. ) who had tortnerly been con vhtcd of perjury; and had stood in the' pillOry. The same perSon,..uncler the name of Joseph Arro w smith had also appointed Nessenger to take care of the Bankrupt's effects : and he had.also been Attorney 'and Witness fur Berbridge andlWalsh in, an Indietment, against - them for a cOnSPiracy to take out the Comthission, in.'hich it was shewn . that df the Petitioning Creditor's debt;,arnonnting to IQOI. 01. had been paid impart. An additional complaint existed against the Solicitor in . this Case.. -By LoM Reslyn's Order two B,arristerS wereyequired to be inserted in every Commission.. Here only one Law fer was nominated. The Loon- CH A NCELI,OR expreed himself in si 7 milar .terms to what he had done in the course of the •former case ; declaring it .to be his Wi . shr that some pro,speaive'rule . could b 6 laid down similar to thzit which he had delivered yesterday. Before .13 , = laid down such rule however, 'he mit* consult witli those persons, note alive, .who . had formerly sat is that Chair, and v. - ich those Connsel, praaising ih the Court, most conversant in E:iitkirs of tj,c kind. Ott the last-mentioned 'ground, however, namely, a : bre.?:ch of the Or(12i• of the Court, could not be clisrensed witholit s'pecial authority to 7- that etfeC.t, he hal no heSit2tiop in finding. ro:A-smith liA)le, in this case, in the expences of: the proceecang3. Ex parte JusTIGE : in the Matter of CLINTNIT.:GIIAir. The deIiERAL appeared in support of the PetitiOn, w'hich rested on .these grounds—That Cunningham was not a horse-dealer, and subject to the Badkrupt Laws, but: . Attorney,. and. that the debt said to be due to .the 'Petitioning- Creditor was not a real debt. .The Petioner would have Made an earlier application, but the fvinkrupt had left the Country in the year 1795, add did not return till 1805. • Mr: ATTORNEY GENERAL' did not see that the compulsory voyage made- 7 15y - the Bankrupt was any ex.cuse for the Petitionex delaying his applica tion from the. year 1790 to the present year; being 16, years. The Application seerning.to be acceded to by the Counsel , for M. Cunningham, who, the Loan" CHANCELLOII observed, was himself in Court, and had . notinstriaaed.his Counsel to repel, with suffi cient spirit, the charge of fraud alledged against hiM - ;—hii Lordship. ordered, that justice might not be impeded-to other parties before the' Court, that this business, already so very sjale, should lie over till he' had got to the end of the Bankrupt Pe tions. It was Lord Kinnoull's acid not Lord Kinnaird's carriage that• was robbed 'of - the trunk pn the North Road, as stated in'Saturday's Paper. SHIP NEWS. GRAVESEND, AUGUST S. • Passed by--the Aurora, Hall, from Malaga ; Abundance, Rice,, from Jamaica ; John, Lestne, from Charlestown ; Diana; Noble, from ; Good. Intent, Rea)+, from Oporto; Eliza, Mossen, from Dublin; Anna Elizath, Barry, Elizabeth, White, Fortuna, Andersett, Elizabeth, Brugge ; ' and Contoreanead, Clas , en,-froin Norway. Sailect—the Eliza Ann, , hams, for Philadelphia; , Frienciship, Barmier, tar Mogadore ; Printz Gustatf, . tbr klambro' ; D.iaiZJ, —, and Attentic, —, fur BlRrns. - On the 3d inst. at Estcot, in Devonshire, the Lady of Sir , -John Kenna way, liart. via Daughter. • .On the Oth inst in Edinburgh, Lady Frances, daughter the Earl of Romney, and Lady of sir John B. Riddell; Bart. .of a Dan,gtuer. _ Lately, at IYrti:::ccrldra,. near Dublin, tie Lady of-Tlio 'mas jont:s, Esq. of a Son: • On,Friday; in Spring Gardens, the Lady of Mr. Mika:la/a Hunter, or a Son, _ Nohday .14. st; the Lady of Charles Philipps,. Esq. •of St. Bride.' HW, Peinsrokeshire, of a Daughter. On Tu;sday lust, Mrs. Copland, orSt. Martin's,lane, of a Son. MARRIED On ,Satti,vi,ay, Balston. Esq. of Maidstone, to NlisS VailanCe dau-itcir of Thomas Vallattee, Esq. of ' C be4pside.' A few days since, p.ccording to the lewish • rites. at, th , :r. Great Synapgtie,• Duke's-Olai.•t!, Mr.. Lyon Caaenworsur k aged 76, to a Mrs. Abrah a ms, aged 6,, after a courtship of 4.0 years, _ _ • On the rst irst. at Nottingham, Thomas li n k ens , E s q. to Miss Fordyce • DIED On the 6th inst. at Park, Glarnorganshire,, in her Soth year, Mrs. Price, rcli(..l of the late Samuel Price, Esq. of that place. PRICE: OF STOCKS , . . . . ...... LON DO N: . i tilted by RI CH AI; f ) 11A R Us, o f No. 4, Martlett-court, Bow-street •• and l'ablisbekt b)*WiLLz Am ARMICiIt SCRfryS, „Of South -Moiton-strect, Grosvenor-square At the SIJOI•OFFIC.E, No. 1 l'.!, Svantt ) where Orders for' the Paper, Letters for the Editor, 4. (vast-paid), must be addressed. SATURDAY.. Bank Stock, India .Stock, Navy c per Cent. 9S 9/ India Bonds, IS: 24. dis. pe.r Cent. t 797, South Sea Stock; Irish 5 per Ceßt..94 I Exchcq. Bills, is. pr. 'ls. 4 per,t4nt. par • 3 per ' Cent% Red ; 65 !, (Thlium, .it to 3 per 2t. Con. 64; 63.61/ 6 Imperial .3 per-Cent. • Bank L. Ann. iS4 Ditto - Ann. 8 9,l6ths • Ditto Shan Ann., Con. for 26th A 4,. 65* 641 - I , I