The Sun. — London, England, 1857-07-11 00:00:00

IW ll .:__ * ----...,_ . ______— '•. -.0 I in tli- hands of the Lijutant-General ffP i ttleati - - 7,-- , :•-:,,,ta. , 4 - .. - '.-''',‘ 4 -.-_-.z, -4 1 - 15 04: k ivl, 416 , 4, fe! ' VS 3 APL - 11 NOTICE OF DIVIDEND. l,'.. 4 4 40,'\ AI - tall • 3/- '''' A l ! ) 4 ~- ---''-,,` Ai._ ----V--2. zr _- 7 ._ z , ‘ e \' - ,-, 7 -. , --- , I,tribution. ~./ , - 1 - 4 ANA OF .DEPOSIT, ...... it It: klirt Pm A r7 14 - ; , : z , „,r" , li 4 1 ' , , ~...,,„ , , y 0 404 ~ _ s - . E ( - -s , 1 5 - ,- .o\ t, i s No. 3, PALL-MALL EAST, LONDON. it 4.,. - 14 ' ' : `"‘ „ 1,1--"P" -- y , / •" 4 b ~.s Ai *lt •.• 1 t•,, • re r 4 - .; ,if _ ~, mrit , . of + P :. - ' 4° •-, Establhhed A.D. 1844. • , ~.., . 3 , _ 4,,e,„ - .?: ,-' /,-,• , 441 • * 1 " o,tl n , ~.' - - -,,,. , 76 0 , . 1 / 4 4 1.1 A The WARTIANT3 for tho ITALF-YEARLY INTEREST, at Vie .-, , .- , , -.-..., .1. 4 11../ , t oll , , 4 l .k, , ,g , 1 ~),, 164 ft l RI 1 .! ri(V4 t -2t . .y..; A 4 rate of 5 per cent. per annum, on Deposit Accounts, to the 30th June, , ..• -' / e ----- . / e , 4i, ',,, - ,, *1.7 ~e ,-- ~ ,,,,t, ~, , ,i -" , ..--- - if ....-: , , T - Y 42, 1 1 ,- * • - --------1, ' rlt , DIF ,41 q" , Ito J-, , - Dt ,- ,7 --- - , ' l / 4 ..\\ ''' '-- --z-- ',,, ' . i vt ~,' ;4. V ' - e +:a . .:::,t4 , iio - - , will be ready for delivery on and after July the lOth, 1857, and Pay- __-- -• ..„-:,-, . e - 3..., ,0, “ .0 ..... 1, r cei ,,, 00 .. ..0 1 n01T. , .. , 4I , --...:- --,,, , . . . , i-. rove r , , 1 - • '•-' ', able daily. - - - PETER 31ORRISON, Managing Director. to 'ff.tg ---.4. ' hem upo - tabll S Parties desirous of INVESTING 310NEY are requested to examine the plan of the Bank of Deposit. Prospectuses and Forms for opening Accounts SENT FREE 011 application. R. W. S. WOODIN'S OLIO of ODDITIES, with New Costumes and • irious Novelties, Vocal and Cha racteristic, EVERY EVENING (Saturday excepted) at Eight. A Morning Performance every Saturday, at Three. Private Boxes nd Stalls may be secured, without extra charge, at the Box-office, Poly , raehic-hall, King William-street, Charing-cross. Tickets to e had at the principal Musicsellers. ROYAL ARGYLL ROOMS.-LA I JRENT'S C tSiNO, Great Windmill-street, Haymarket. —Great suc cess of the Lancers, every evening, with Laurent's Grand Orchestra of Forty of the first artistes of Lon lon. Principal Cornet-a-➢iston, M. Boulcourt. Doors open of half est eight. commence at nine. The Lancers will be danced at half-pa,t ten. Admission One Shilling. -ROYAL SURREY GARDEN S.- TO-NIGHT, Saturday. July 11, The GUIDES' CELE BRATED BAND (by the gracious peression of his majesty the /Ong of the Belgians) will make their tenth appearance. Vocalist, Madame GASS ER. I onductor of the Vocal M us' c, Mr. ALF it E D MELLON. Grand Instrumental and Vocal Concert. COndue or of the Guides Band, M. BENDER.—Admission, One Shilling. Doors open at 4 ; Ban I. at 5 ; Circus, 7 ; Concert, A ; Fireworks, - 11. Stalls and Private Boxes may be secured at Jullien's, Regent street ; and 'Keith, Prowse, and Co.'s, Cheapside. Omnibuses in attendance at the close of the performance to all parts. The only authorised Programme to 1 e bad in the Gar tens.—N.B. Children in arms will not be admitted into the Concert Room. • THP2, PEOPLE'S PROTEST AGAINST THE 11,EDICAL SALE AND .USE OF. POISONS,IIes for Signa ' tare at the British College of Health, New Road, London, and of all the Hygeian Agents throughout the kingdom. `ARE YOU GOING TO THE HIGHLANDS, unrivalled for scenery, famous' in story and song? If so, Rake a note to call at (when in the capital of the beautiful No th) MACDOUGALL'i WAREHOUSE, High-street, Inverness. There only can the varied products of the Highland+, natural and industrial, be seen: In his extensive rooms vacdougall has gathered together all the best productions of the Highland looms in Tweeds, Tartans, Limeys, Plaids, Shawls, Dresses, the favourite Highland Cloak, Flora Macdonald ditto, &c., &c., with the best native Jewellery (Cairngorms, Pearls. &c.) ; the pretty products of the Skye, Lewis; and Gairloch Looms and Knitting-needles; the Home-made, Undyed Plaids of Ord Sutherland, and Avoch the Snuff-boxes, Coups, Bickers of the Culloden Catvers, &c, Sine by side with all this he has placed all the necessary Clothing, of every description, forileer Stalking, Grouse Shooting, and for Tourils, &c. Visitors to his Rooms can at once compare the varied products of the three King doms.—D Macdougall, Inverness. PRINCE ALBERT ROAD, Hyde-park.--In this delightful and desirable neighbourhood are to be LET or SOLD several select and elegantly finished Residences; their architec tural display is of the highest order, and the internal arrangements are everything that can possibly be desired; in size they are tutted for the occupancy of both the Nobleman and Gentleman and the study of comfort has been the chief object, of the builder. This now Most fashionable part of London renders the locality - of these buildings undeniable, being contiguous to Kensington-gardens, with its beautiful walks, and Hyde-park, with its rides and drives; added to which the salubrity of the air of Kensington-gore is proverbial, and considered by the faculty the- most healthful in the vicinity of the metropolis. Apply at the Office, 1, Prince Albert-Road, South Kensington. • SALE OF PROVISIONS, &c., AT GOSPORT. ADMIRALTY, SOMERSET-PLACE, Bth July, 1857. 'TIRE Commissioners for Executing the Office of IL Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland do hereby give notice, that on rRIDAY, the 31st Inst„ at 12 o'clock at noon, the Captain Superintendent will put up to Sale, in the Royal Clarence Victualling Yard at Gosport, several Lots of Army and Navy Provisions, and Victualling, Cooperage, and Transport Stores, consisting of Rice, Oil Cake, Tongues, Salt Meat, Biscuit and Biscuit Bags, Preserved Vegetables, Casks, Staves, Blankets, Bedding, &c , &c., &c., all lying in the said Yard. . . Persons wishing to view the Lots must apply to the Superintendent for notes of admission, for that purpose. . . Catalogues and Conditions of Sale may be had here and at the Yard. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That WILLIAM JONES, of the King's Arms, in the parish of Christchurch, in the county of Monmouth, maltster, hatb, by an Indenture of Assignment, bearing date the sixth day of July, 1857, and made between the said WILLIAM JONES, of tat first part, DAVID HARRHY, of Newport, in the county of Monmouth, wine merchant, and WILLIAM WILLIAMS, of Tregarne, in the parish of Langstone, in the said county of Monmouth, farmer, of the second part,, and the several other persons.whose names and seals Were thereunto - subscribed and set, teing respectively Creditors of the said William Jones of the third part assigned, All his Malt, Rots, Beer, Stock in Trade, and personal Er ects, to the said David Ilarrhy and William Williams, in trust for the equal benefit of such Of the Creditors of the said William Jones as shall assent to and execute the said Indenture of Assignment within three calendar Months from the date thereof. The said Indenture of Assignment Was duly executed by the said William Jones on the said 6th day of July, 1857, in the presenct of, and attested by, Thomas Morgan Ltew ell in, of Newport aforesaid, attorney-at-law, and Thomas John tu ra 3 "rgan, ef the same place, attorney's-clerk the same d on the duly executed by the said David Harrky, on the sa'd 6th day of July, 1857, and by the said William Williams on the Bth day 9P I -113 , , 1857, in the presence-of, and attested by, the said Thomas M. Llewellin and Thomas John Morgan, CHWEPPE'S MALVERN SELTZ ER ,N-7, WATER, manufactured by SCHWEPPE and Co., the sole lessees of the Holy Well, possesses all the celebrated properties of the Nassau S'ring. SCHWEPPE'S SODA, MAGNESIA, POTASS WATERS and LEMONADE, aro manufactured as usual. Every Bottle is protected by a Label with their siznature. SCIIWEPPE and CO., Man facturers of Soda, Magnesia, and Potass Waters and Lemonade London, Liverpool, Bristol, and Derby. 21 2 0 m ILNER'S HOLDFAST and FIRE RESISTING SAFES (non -conducting and vapourising), "k ith all the improvements, under their Quadruple Patents of 1840-51-54 and 1955, including their Gunpowder Proef Solid Lock and Door (without which no Safe is secure). THE STRONGEST, BEST, AND CHEAPEST SAFEGUARD EXTANT. MILNERS' PHCENIX (212.) SAFE WORKS, LIVERPOOL, the most complete and ex t ens i ve i n th e wo rld. Show-rooms, 6 and 8, Lord -street, Liverpool. LONDON DEPOT, 47A, MOORGATE STREET, City. Circulars tree by post. INVESTMENTS in BRITISH MINES. JUL Full particulars of the most important Dividend and Progressive Mines Will be found in the Fourth Edition of BRITINFI MINES CmOuNitSclnsDll,llo7, Faxi as an INVESTMENT, recently published by J. H. F.G.5.,.F.5.5. Price 3s. 641., by post, 4s. Mr. Murchison also publishes a QUARTERLY REVIEW of lIRITISII MINING, giving the position and prospects of the Mines At the end of each quarter, the Dividends paid, &c. &c. The REVIEW for the Quarter ending 31st of MARCH, 1857, is NOW R EADY, with a Map of the Alfred and Rosewarne mining districts, price Is. "" The book will be fo un d extremely valuable."—Observer. A valuable little book."—Globe, A valuable guide to Investors."—Herapath. "A useful little volume."—Morning Herald. "Of great value to capitalists."—Sunderland Times. " Parties requiring information on mining investments will find on better and safer instructor than Mr. Murchison."—Leeds Times. " One of the most valuable mining publications which has come under our notice, and contains more information than any other on the subject of which it treats."—Derby Telegraph. " To those who wish to invest capital in British mines this work is of the first importance"—Welshman! "This work enables the capitalist to invest on sound principles it is, in truth, an excellent guide."— Plymouth Journal. Copies of the above publications can be obtained at Mr. Murchi /lon's Oflices, 117, Bishopsgate-street Within, London; and reliable i nformation and advice will at any time be given to those who may require -it. (No. 20,298.) PUBLICATIONS. MRS. S. C. HALL'S NEW NOVEL. Now ready, at all the Librarie., in 3 vols. A WOMAN'S. S T O R Y. .CA. By Mrs. S. C. HALL. Hurst and Blackett, publishers, successors to Henry Colburn, 13, Great Marlborough-rreet. Now ready, is 2 vols., with Portral, 21s , pLAISTOW AND VICTORIA DOCK N. The promoters of the abo ve MISSI Missio O n will feel deeply grateful to any Clergymen who will kindly advocate the claims of the im portant cause they have undertaken, either in the pulpit or among their friends. The sphere of the Mission is in a filthy town lately built and ra pidly extending, in an Undrained swamp adjoining the Thames, seven feet below high water mark. The poor inhabitants have con tributed most liberally of their penury, and it is earnestly desired to enlist the sympathy of the rich West towards this attempt to raise the spiritual, social, and physical condition of their brethren in this Poor and neg'ected district,. in the extreme East of Loudon. The Bishop is to select the Clergy. Full particulars of the Mirscion will thankfully be given (on,appli cation) by the Rev. R. W. B. Marsh, Incumbent of Plaistow; the Rev. Alfred W. Mason, Secretary, Stratford-green, E ; or :by An tonio Brady, Esq., Treasurer, Maryl an d- po i n t, Stratford, E. 4 IIT 9 BIOGRAPAY of ELIZABETH DAVIS, _ A BALAKLAYA NURSE. Edited by JANE WILLIAMS, " An original and interesting work. giving a sketch of the varied and adventurous life of a very remarkable woman."—Sun. " Hurst and Blackett, Publishers, 13, Great Marlborough-street. Now Ready, at all the Libraries, in 2 Vols., 215., O YHING NEW. By the Author of" JOHN HALIFAX, GENTLEMAN." " The reader will find these narratives fully calculated to remind him of that truth and energy of human portraiture, that spell over human affections andemotions which have stamped th s author one of the first novelists of our day."—John Bull. A New and Cheaper Edition of " JOHN HALIFAX" is also just published, complete in 1 vol. 10s. 6d. bound. Hurst and Blackett, Publishers, successors to Henry Colburn. MRS. GORE'S NEW NOVEL, T HE TWO ARISTOCRACIES, Is now ready at all the Libraries, in 3 vols., " The Two Aristocracies' is by many degrees the best and plea suitest of Mrs. Gore's later novels."—Atbenmum. " This latest production of Mrs. Gore's pen may vie with the most popular slid most brilliant of her works."--John 111111. A very charming story ` The Two Aristocracies' will increase Mrs. Gore's fame."—Observer. Hurst and Blackett, Publishers, successors to Henry Colburn. This Day is published, THE ATTIELINGS; or, The Three Gifts. By MIISALIPH ANT. n Three Vols. post Bvo, price 11. .Is. 6d. Originally published in " Blackwood's Magazine." William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh and London ; This day, in post Bvo, price 9s. A JULY HOLIDAY in SAXONY, BOHEMIA, and SILESIA. By WALTER WHITE, Author of "A Londoner's Walk tti the Land's Emir!! Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly. This day, in crown Bvo., price Cs. THE IBISH SKETCH BOOK, By W. M. TBACKERAY. With Illustrations. A. cheap Edition. Uniform with Mr. Thackeray's " ➢lisellaneous Essays." Chapniin and Hall, 193, Piccadilly, Just rublshed, mice 55., the NATIONAL REVIEW. CONTENTS: No. 11. I. 11. 111 v. yr. VII. [PRia - E; 4D. STAMPED 5D.] Mr. Lever's Novels. Vecent Researches in Central Africa. London Street Architecture. The Alleged Non-Existence of Shakespeare. Critical Theories of Baur, and Others, on till Fourth Gospel. Misa Bronte. Lord Brougham. The Mon'hester Exhibition. The University of London and Middlc-Class Education. The New Parliament. Books of the (blotter suitable for Reading Societies. Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly. FEIST'S RACING RECORD. Edited by ALBER P FEIST, 1 ditor of the Turf Department of the ` _ Sunday TimeP," and Re __ porter of Sporting Intelligence to the London Daily Papers. heard in that house, and the effect of which he greatly feared would be severely felt in the division on the bill. But the Legislature of the country was not more Chris tian than it was Protestant, but the Legislature had de cided on admitting Catholics to a share, and in the face if this it was still contended that the constitution and Legislature of the country were Protestant. (Mar.) The sacr ttnental test had been defended with as much ar dour as the present form of words, butbefore the last act was repealed the custom of taking part in that most so lemn of all the ceremonies of a Christian Church bad so far degenerated that on one occasion an aged peer, when appointed to an office in the king's household, was told he must qualify for the office by taking the sacrament. The nol le peer went to a place of worship, and when asked afterwards how he had got through the ceremony, it was found that he had been present, not knowing the difference, at the claurching of a woman, and had ❑ot received the sacrament at all. "(Laughter.) The reason of the exclusion of the Jews from the legislature had not. arisen from any demerits of their own, but simply from the smallness of their numbers. The Half-yearly Part, neatly bound in cloth, in now published price One Shilling. In addition to a complete Calendar of SPORT, from the Ist of January up to the day of publication, the book has been fully indexed, and contains a summary of the St. Legcr Bet ing, Lists. of Winning Horses, strut much Information of practical utility to racing,men. W. Wright, sporting printer and publisher. Fulwood's Rents, Hol born, London. The Bishop of OXFORD said the noble and learned I. , rd bad striven with' his great powers as an advocate to impress upon their lordships that they were discuSsing the oath of atjuration, and not the admission of the Jews to the I?gislature. (Hear, hear, hear.) The noble and learned lord endeavoured to put them on a wrong scent. He had - told them that the game, was in one direction, when their lordships had seen it break cover in another. (Cheers.) It had been suggested that the omitted words might be put into this bill, but was not that a transparent trap, because, if the bill were so a-nended and sent back to the Commons, there the words would be again - struck out and the bill would be brought back to the house at such a late period of the session that it would pals without the proposed words. As to the question of right with regard to the admission of persons to the legislature, why did they exclude mem bers of their own church and the priests of the Roman Catholic Church ? The fact was that this was no right, it was a trust tiv.t was given to a man for the benefit of the State, and t erefore upon that trust certain condi tions lure property imposed, It they admitted the Jew to Pcrliament, how could they appeal t> a Christian principle, when that one man might say such a prin ciple cannot apply to me. It was once said that the Legislature of this country was a Protestant Legisla ture. Could any one say that it was a Protestant Legis. la are now ? No, they could not. Admit the Jew, and , they eoiild not refuse to admit the Mosmon, the Hindoo, or the Mahomedau. They were afiivr asked to admit, under an artifice, a pestilent impostdre.- -A conscientious Jew would administer honestly Christian laws; but a conscientious Jew would not honestly make Christian laws ; and there was the great distinction which existed between allowing the Jew to make the laws, and allow ing him to administer the laws. It was impossibie that the Christian and the Jew could combine in honest action. And therefore it was that he dared to face the charge of intolerance, for he believed that they could not, as a Christian people, allow those who denied Christ to make their Christian laws. The Third Edition. Jett Pribllshed, mice 55., by post, free, ss. 6d ON TRUE & FALSE SPERMATORRH(EA, with the View of distinguishing the Imaginary from the Real Sufferers under this disease, and Correcting of wide-spread Errors in relation to their Treatment and Care. Translated from the German of Dr. PICKFORD. The Duke of ARGYLL denied that the Government had raised a false issue on the subject ; for they had three or four times introduced a bill going directly to allow the Jaws to be admitted to Parliament. In that they bad been unsuccessful, and therefore they were fully justified in endeavouring to accomplish that object under another form. The Government did not deny that one of the main objects of the bill was th• admission of the Jews, and they had endeavoured to meet that ob ject in the best way consistent with the consciences of all. It was quite impossible ever to get an amendment of the oath if the words "On the true faith of a Chris tian," were retained. The House of Commons would never sanction such an amendment. The accusation of the noble earl opposite (Lord Derby), that the noble lord at the head of the Government was playing fast and loose with this matter, came with a very bad grace from the noble earl, who bad played fast and loose with a vital principle—not upon an Act of Parliament involv ing no principle, but a vital principle—when he was at tempting to form a Cabinet. The right rev. prelate who bad just sat down had talked about admitting the Mor mons. Why, according to the oath as it now stood Brigham Young could enter Parliament without the slightest obstruction. The Earl of GALLOWAY said he considered the bill amounted to a total abjuration of the principles of Christianity, and it was nothing to tell him that Unitarians and others obtained admission to Parlia ment, because they did it on their own respsnsibility. The house then thy ided— - Contents—Present 9l Proxies 4B —139 Non-Contents—Present Proxies 64 —173 34 Majority against the bill Sir J. TROLLOPE objected to the compromise. The committee on the last occasion affirmed a principle and not a detail. The principle was that people in this coun try should be allowed to transact their business with the persons in whom they had confi lance, and not concen trate all business in London. If the Attorney-General's principle were agreed to, it would become a most expen• sive measure for the country. He would resist the pro• pa: Won to negative the clause as it stood. Mr. WALPOLE thought all the arguments against wiils above 3,000/. being proved in the country were equally valid against wills of 7001. being so proved. What he recommended was, to fix no limit to the per sonalty, but to provide for all funded, joint-stock, and railway property being proved in London. Mr. ELLICE also strongly condemned the idea of a limit. "Dr. Pickford is known to English readers by his frequent practi 'al contributions to German medical literature. This is the first time, he informs us, that be has addressed himself to the noa-medi cal reader. We trust this may not be the last, if he shall detect any other equally flagrant evil which it may be in his power to cor rect."—London Medical Gazette. " The tribe of ' Quiet Sympathisers, and ' Medical Friends,' are mercilessly exposed ; and if this book scald find its way into the hands of those who satnr from the com plaint of which it treats, we are satisfied that many hundreds would be saved much needless suffering of body and mind, and what is of less importance, though it Is that which the quacks most prize— nuch money...... This volume is well qualified to put an end to the mpirical system of treating Spermatorrhcea, and to place the treat ment upon a more rational and physiological basis. It is, therefore, likely to do much good."—Medical Circular. London: H. Ralliere, 219, Regent-street. POLICE (SCOTLAND) BILL. This bill was read a third time and passed. The house adjourned at a quarter to twelve. HOUSE OF COMMONS.—(YEsTRADAY.) The ►SPEAKER took the chair at 4 o'clock. ' FRANKLIN EXPEDITION. ri OR the SEA SIDE.—TRAVELLING SUITS, with complete. 2/ 18s. to Three Guineas; the Beaufort Coat, 21. 10s. ; the new summer Trousers, - ouc — otawe. 1 Bsden Waistcoats, Two for One Guinea. EXCELLENCE WITH ECONOMY. GEORGE HOBSON, 57, Lombard-street. ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF ENGLAND.-SALISBURY, 1857. PIOGRAMME. TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY, JULY 21, and 22. The Implement Yard open from Ten o'clock in the morning tin Six o'clock in the evening. on Tnsulay; and from seven o'clock in the morning till Six o'clock in the evening, on Wednesday : at an admission charge of 2s 6d. for each person. Machinery will be ex. hibited at work on each of those days, at the following hours, or at such other hours as the Stewards may determine:— I. WORKED BY STEAM, OR OTHER (THAN HAND) POWER. Thrashing Machines.. ... • • • From Eleven till One o'clock. Tile and Brick Machines . From Twelve till Two o'clock. Saw and other Mills. ..... . From One till Three o'clock. Chaff engines........ • • .. From Two till Four o'clock. 11. WORKED BY P AND POWER. From Eleven till One o'clock. From Twelve till Two o'clock. From One till Three o'clock. From Two till Four o'clock , From Two till Four o'clock CANCER HOSPITAL, London and West Brompton.—Secretary's Office, 167, Piccadilly.—This Institu tion has been established exclusively for the treatment of the poor afflicted with cancerous diseases. Out-door patients to attend at 167, Piccadilly, on Tuesdays, at 2 o'clock. In-door patients are admitted at the Brompton Establishment, for one month, and for a longer period if recommended by the medical officers. The number of per- Pons under treatment as in or out-door patients have averaged for the last three years about 400 cases each year. Since the foul:elation of this Hospital in 1851, 1,799 poor persons, suffering under every form of this dreadful malady, have received the benefits of this Charity. A Weekly Board manage its affairs, and every informa 1011.connected with the Inetitution may be obtained on application to the Secretary. Contributions to enable the Committee to continue this great work of benevolence are urgently solicited, and may be id to William Loxh am F arrar, E sq., the T reasurer , 66, Lincoln's laces, 167, inn fields; Messrs. Coutts and Co., Strand ; and at the Secretary's u Piccadilly, By order._ W. J. COCKERILL Secretary. Chaff-cutters • Tile•machine ...... • • • • • • • Turnip-cutters ... Oilcake-breakers .... • ....... Winnowing-mwhines, barley-hum mellers, &c. ••..: Miscellaneous ........... .• . From 'T wo till Four o'clock . From Two till Four o'clock WEDNESDAY, 22. The judges to Inspeeithell;;stoeli and farm-poultry, and to award the prices. '"" ' . • Public trials of the steam cultivators, on land 'ln the neighbour hood of the city, during such hours as the Stewards may determine. At One o'clock (or as soon after as all the Judges shall have de livered in their awards, of which notice will be given) the public to be admitted into the cattle-yard and to the exhibition of farm poul try, on the payment of ss. each person, at the special entrance ; Members of Council and Governors of the Society being admitted by tickets to be purchased at the Finance Department of the Society at the show-yard. At Eight o'clock in the evening the cattle and poultry yards will be closed. Dinner in the Council Chamber, at Six o'clock in the evening. T URSDAY, 23. Mr. HORSFALL moved for an address for copies of memorials and addresses relating to the Franklin E4pe dition which have beeri recently transmitted to the Go vernment, or to the First Lord of the Treasury, from the merchants of New York, the Royal Irish Academy, the Royal Dublin Society, and other public bodies.-- Agreed to. IRISH MILITIA REGIMENTS. Lord C. HAMILTON asked the "Under Secretary for War if he could state to the house whether it was intended to call out the iiigh rogimAnts for train ing during the en'uing autumn! Sir J, RAMSDEN said it was not the intention of the Government to call out any regiment of the Irish militia this year. The rule it was intended to follow was not to call out any of the regiments embodied during the late war. The general show-yard of (tattle, horses, sheep, pigs, farm.poultry. and implements open to the public from Six o'clock In the morning till Six in the everting; admission, 2s. 6d. each person. Public trials or the steam cultivators, on land in the neighbour.. hood of the city, during such hours as the stewards may det er . aim NO MORE PILLS NOR ANY OTHER MEDICINE CURES (without Physic) of Indigestion (Dyspepsia), Constipation, Flatulency, Phlegm, all Nervous, Bilious, and Liver Complaints, Hysteria, Neuralgia, Dysntery, Diarrhoea, Acidity,. Palpitation, Heartburn, Headache, Debility, Despondency, Cramps, Spasms, Nausea, and Sickness (during pregnancy or at sea), Sinking Fits, Cough, Asthma, Bronchitis, Consumption, also Children's Com plaints, are effected by 1 1. U BARRY'S delicious REVALENTA -I1 ARABICA FOOD, which restores he a lth w ith oat purging, inco nvenience, or expense, as it saves fifty times its cost, in other remedies. It is, moreover, the best food for infants and invalids generally, as it never turns acid on the weakest stomach, nor inter feres with a good 'al diet, but imparts a healthy relish for lunch and dinner, and restores the faculty of digestion, and nervous and muscular energy to the most enfeebled. We extract a few out of the many thousand expressions of grati tude from invalid s : - C ure No. 71, of dyspepsia , from the Right Hon. a the Lord Stuart d e D ecies. " I h ve r derived coasidemble benefit from Du Barry's R svalenta Arabica ood yourselves and the p u bli c to authorise the , and consider it due to Stuart de Decies." - C ure No. 49,831. Publication of these lines. Fitty years' indescribable agony from dyspepsia, ne rvousness, asthma, cough, constip a ti on , flatulency, spasms, and sickness at he stomach and vomiting, have been removed by Du Barry's excellent Food. Nlar la JotYWortham Ling, near Disc, ortolk."—Cure No. 47,121. Miss Elizabeth -- N Jacobs, of Nazing Vicarage, Waltham Cross, Ilerts, a cure of e ex ine n er -vousness, indigestion, gatherings, low spirits, an d nervous extreme Cure No. 48,314. Miss Elizabeth Yeoman, Gate acre, near Liver Pool : a euroof ten's dyspepsia, and all the horrors of nervous irrita bility. Cure No. 18,216. Dr. Andrew Ure of constipation, dyspep sia, nerveps irritability. Cure No. 34,210. Dr.Shoreland ofdropsy and debility. Cure NO. :15,212. Captain Allan of epileptic tits. Cure No. 42,116. Major Edie of enlargement of the liver and total prostration of strength. Cure No. 36,418. Rev. Dr. Minster of cramm spasms, and daily vomitings, Cure. No. 26,418. Dr. Har vey of 'diarrhoea and debility. Cure No. 29,628. Dr. Wurtzer of consumption. Cure No. 32,883. William Hunts, Esq., barrister, of paralysis. Cure No. 46,270. Mr. James Roberts, wood merchant, of thirty years diseased lung's, spitting of blood, liver derangement, Partial deafness. Cure No. 4 ,1114. Mr. Samuel Laxton, Leicester, of two years' diarrhoea. Cure No. 52,612. The Dowager Countess of Castlestuart, of many years' nervous irratibility, bile, and indi gestion. Cure :No. 54,812. Miss Virginia Zeguers, cured of con suinption, st - cer her medical advisers had abandoned all hopes of recovery, Cure No, 180. " Twenty-five years' nervousness, con "lettoi. indigestion, and debility, from which I have suffered great m '?-cry, and which no medicine could remove or relieve, have been eaectually cured by Du Barry's Food in a very short time. W. E. beeves, 181, Fleet-street, London." No. 4,208. "Eight years' d:s -I),..eps la. nervousness, debility, with cramps, spasms, and nausea, for " h 'eh my servant had consulted the advice of many, have been effectually cured by Du Barry's health restoring Food. I shall be h appy to answer any inquiries. Rev. John Dawn. Ridlington Rec tory, Norfolk." No. 32,836. "Three years' excessive nervousness, With pains in my neck and left arm, and general debility, which ren dered my life very miserable, has been radically removed by Du Barry's health restoring Food. Alex. Stuart, Archdeacon of Rose, Skibbereen." Cure No. 3,906. " Thirteen years' cough, indigestion, and general debility have been removed by Du Barry's excellent „ .tevalenta Arabica Food. ,lames Porter, Athol-street, Perth." Important Caution against the fearful dangers of spurious imita tations : The Vice-Chancellor Sir William Page Wood granted an injunc tion on the 10th March, 1854, against Alfred Hooper Neville, for Imitating "Du Barry's Revalenta Arabica Food." Suitably packed for all - climates, and with full instructions, In canisters, llb 2s Oci ; 21b 4 s 60 ; 5113 lls , 121 b 225. The 121 b car riage free, on receipt of Post-office order. Barry Da Barry and Co.. 77,, Regent-street, London; Fortnum, Mason, and Co.. par- Yeyorslo her Majesty, 182, Piccadilly , also at 60, Gracechurch street ; 330,430, and 451, Strand ; 4, Cheapaide ; 49, Bliihopsgate -31130 ; 63,150, and 158 Oxford-greet. DU BARRY'S CELEBRATED INFANTS FOOD, for DELTC iTE INFANTS, CHILDREN, and IN VALIDS. Supersedes the expense and dangers of wet nursing, is more easily d gested, and imparts more healthful nourishment than Milk ; acidity, cramps, bowel complaints, flatulency, cough, restless ness; scrofula, eruptions, are avoided by it, and y erfect regularity of the system and sound sleep in:tired. Many respectable families who have reared and saved delicate Infants by this Food can be referred to, and a copy of their Testimonials may be had free on forwarding a stamped and addressed envelope to Barry Da Parry and Co., 77, Regent-street, London. Prices: —ln Canisters, Is.; 25.; and 121 t. at 21s. The large Canister will be forwarded free of carriage on receipt of Post Office Order. Mr. MALINS, on the other hand, strongly objected to the principle that one probate should not cover all descriptions of property, and that a district registrar whose decision should not be conclusive in a case of 3,0001., was not to be allowed to deal with 1001. in the Three per Cents. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said he must adhere to his intention to negative the clause as itatood, but he intimated that if the 'house yielded to his wishes in this respect he would bring up a clause removing all limit to personal property that was not comprised in funded property, railway shares, &c. Lord PALMERSTON, immediately following the Attorney-General, agreed with bim in the view he took ; but, holding that opinion, he did not see that there was any need to negative the clause. The clause was then, amid loud cheers, ordered to stand part of the bill. i e i r r a . llyail L e l et MANS t h e had u e s s o t m i o e n c b l a y u g d e e s p r t i o v n p g r o t p b o e s e p r o giving ctor cs o of billms tw p i e ol n u s l a d ti morndeprive e proctors stsh: mhe. wb f ithdhoe postponeintimated o i s f t ch w laa h tu i which the thett h i e l dpoisiou to which the house had just c o m e wou ld con he saw hew this question of district courts was finally settled. The ATTORNEY•GENERAL intimated that ever compensation might be awarded unr this bill would be paid out of the Fee Fund, and not out of the public exchequer. Several divisions took place with respect to the sche dules, between the claims of different towns to be the places of registration, but the towns as named in the bill were in all cases unaltered. The house then resumed. The Crown, &e., Suits (Scotland) Bill and the Bank ruptcy and Real Securities (Scotland) Bill were read a third time and passed. Other bills were advanced a stage. Oa the order for going into committee upon the Elea t objected to discussing the details of Mr. ADDERLEY complained bitterl y of the ob siuocsnhi rPae G. i t G io ß ns E measure ß y a ilt that late hour. 1 ' staoles to the progress alba bill. After some further discussion the house divided upon a motion by Mr. AYRTON for an adjournmemt, which was carried by 95 to 25. The house adjourned at a quarter past 1 o'clock. The total amount of gold purchased by the Bank on i t own attendance ts hitetest o oks s omewhat hallo mh o eer f awer t het h ae °h e ti sol i o r h o pe n ac s n rka e a a t di vtafternoon.teehrves Wednesday is understood to have reached 100,000/. Julyat the 9 mom . t — pewte T i toei h aßn e tgo r h e fehrt w elilag a d s i fortnight i r an o ufth stilll IRONMA.sTERs' QUARTERLY MEETING.—BIRMINGHAM, The hot An attempt was made to-day to obtain an advance of half a crown a ton, but this was not conceded ; there were, however, many sales of good mine pigs at 4/. 2s. 6d. per ton. Stone a shade in advance of yes. terday's quotations. [ADVERTISEMENTA—HoIIoway's Pille.—A. sovereign remedy for all all complaints originating in the internal organs, producing the most astonishing results; and all who are liable to attacks of indigestion shou:d fortify their system against the relaxing heats . of summer by this mild aperient and alterative in the spring. It re moves all obstructions in the sto mach, an d the digestive powers, when weaken ed by indul re-vita gence ses or rendered. torpid by a sedenta r y life ; the testimony of i n valids in all parts of the wor ld demoostrates the heal -1 New York ; by A. Stam pa , ( . I, nstanti - A. n o e, u id ic , ing power of this potent remedy.—Sol , l by all medi cine venders throughou t the world ; at Professor Hol loway's Establishm ents, 244, Strand, London. and 80, Maidene ; - y Smyrna; and E. Muir, Malta. no Ea n vearissmmadSrSolomon,smes AND GENT LEM E N .0? Till A RMY AND NAVY. - S. and B. Solomon, opticians, 39, Albe marle-street, P iccadill y , West. Observe—o pp osite the Yor k Li o tel. —Portability, combined with great power in Field, pl Racec ourse. Opera, and general out-door day and night -la powerful waistcoat pocket Perspective Glasses, weighing only four ounces, each containing 12 and 18 lenses, con structed of German glass, will show distinctly..a person's countenance two and a half and three miles. They servo every purpose on the race-course, and at - the opera houses, country scenery, and ships are clearly seen at 8 to 10 miles. T ley are also invaluable for shooting, deer-stalking, and yachting. Single ones, the size of a walnut, possessing the same great power. Her Majesty's Coast-Guards are making use of them as day and night glasses, in general use by gen• tlemen, of the Army and Navy, and by sportsmen, gentlemen, gamekeepers, and tourists. The most powerful and brilliant telescopes, possessing such extraordinary power that some. three and a-half inches, with an extra astronomical eye-Pio"' will show distinctly Jupiter's moon's, Saturn's ring, and th e double stars ; with the same telescope c an be seen a person s co untenance three-and-a-half miles distant and an object from 14 to 16 miles. All the abov e can be bad of larger and all sizes, with increasing po wers, and are securedted b y Spec m Her Majesty's Royal Letters P a t ent. Newly-inv en ted Spec :he valu tacle Lenses of the greatest transparent rot. d persons ar becomes preserved and strengthened spectacles in a letter, and enabled to employ their sight at t he rou st less ni, if . Ign ymg power can see with these lenses of a inn i 4 the frequent e \awes to the —and they do not reenu i re - powerful assistance. ' Persons dangerous effects of furt kor el remote part of the world by send eau be suited at the out "at able advantage derived from this inr rnem t r i y o: nagutee , oc t e l u sa p t at vi i vision stating the dist ,ilce from the eye they eau read small print I th t e he lel . t perceptible ; the and those who have not made use of spectacles by with it, stating their ago. Deafness.—A. newly-invented instrument for extreme c a ses of deafness, called the 'Sound Magnifier, Organic Vibr a tor„ and invisible Yoke ,Couductor. It fits so unplea sant sensation of singing noises in the head is entirely moved It It affords instant relief to the deafest persons, and enables them to hear distinctly at church andrat public assem blies. 31, Ai --jeumle:etreet, Piccadilly:- Opposite the York Hotel, W. . „.. • o b u e t i : in; into tubeeoef ar th a g n l O aseee t to ON PHYSICAL DISQUALIFICATIONS, GENERATIVE INCAPACITY, AND IMPEDIMENTS TO MARRIAGE. New and improved Edition, enlarged to 196 pages, illustrated by 100 Anatomical Coloured Engravings on Steel, just published, price, free by post, Is., THE SILENT FRIEND : A Medical Work or, the physical exhaustion and decay of the frame, from the effects of solitary indulgence, infection, and the injurious conse quences from the use of Mercury; with observations on the oblige:. eons of marriage, and directions for obviating certain disqualifica tions. By R. and L. Pr RRY and CO., Surgeons. Sold by J. Allen, 20. Warwick-lane, Paternoster-row; Sanger, 160, Oxford-street; and Gordon, 146, Leadenhall-street, London. The COR DIA L BALM of SYRTACUM is employed in bothsexes to renovate the impaired powers of life. Its action is purelybalsamic; its power in reinvigorating the frame in all cases of nervous anti FCXUaI debility, obstinate gleets, impotency, barrenness, and debi lities arising' from venereal excesses, has been demonstrated by its unvarying success in thousands of cases. Price I Is. per bottle, or four quantities in one for 335., which saves 1 Is. an anti-syphi pTilltrAlf3lZtliiTsTysEteßmBl,Na'nEdEisS;;eEcoNMCmrended for any of tic t r e e I C . O e dNye, for the varied forms of secondary symptoms, such as eruptions on the skin, blotches on the head and face, enlargements of the throat, tonsils, and uvnla ; threatened destruction of the nose, palate, &c. Its action is purely detersive, and its beneficial influence on the system is undeniable. Price 115. and 335, per bottle, also a saving SPECIFIC PILLS constitut e an effec tual remedy in either sex for all cases of gonorrhoea, glect, stricture, and diseases of the urinary organs. Price 2s. 9d., 4L 6d , an i 11s. par boa. Sold by Daniel Church, 78, Gracechurch - street , City ; Bartlett Hooper, 43, King William-street (four doors from London Bridge) ; G. F. Watts, 17, Strand ; W. Sutton and Co., 10, Bow-churchyard; W. Edwards, 67, St. Paul's-churchyard ; J. Sanger, 150, 07xford street ; Bennay and Dietrichsen, 63, Oxford-street; Buti4r and Harding, 4, Cheapside ; Prout and Harsant, 229, Strandl; pnd all medicine vendors throughout the 17nited ilicgdoal• Sit W. .CODRINGTON. expressed delay in reference to tie diltribution THE RUSSIAN TA' Mr. J. L. RICARDO asked the the Board of Trade whether the G , knowledge of the details of the revised and. if so, whether they would lay tl *I of the house • Mr. LO WE said, that he had received some account of the change. alluded to, but it was in too imperfect a state to lay on the table of the house. As smuas he received fir!' information on the question he would lay it on the table of the house. NEWSPAPER SECURITIES. Mr. AYRTON asked whether it was the intention of Government to continue the prosecution of the publisher of the Bury Times, and to abstain from prosecuting the publisher of the Free P —WOl= - ers and pamphlets published witroTer re aYpranoißTilribie statutes relating to security and registration The C l l ANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that the Government intended to proceed with the pro secution of the Bury Times, and that they would pro ceed in a similar manner against all aewepapers that did not comply with the statutory enactments respecting security and registration of newspapers. The Free Press alluded to was not considered to be a newspaper, and no proceedinee would be taken against it. COLONIAL LABOUR. Me TURNER asked the First Lord of the Treasury, whether any communication had taken place between the English and French Governments respecting the ex ports of negroes from the West Coast of Africa to the French Colonies in the West Indies ; and whether he was aware in what manner the negroes were to be ob tained Sir E. BUXTON called the attention of the Govern ment to the emigration of negroes to the Isle of Bourbon. Lerd PALMERSTON said that the Government were aware of the French Government being engaged in transporting negroes from the West Coast of Afrioa to the French c ilonies, and confidential communication had been made to the French Government relative to the matter. The French Government bad assured her Ma jesty's Government that it was their anxious desire that the 'arrangements they had made for procuring negro labour should not lead to the revival of the slave trade—indeed that every precaution had been taken to preventit. It would be ihe duty of her Majesty's Govern went to obtain all the information they could, and if neces sary, call the attention of the French Government to any breach of the regulations laid down by them in reference to the emigration of free negroes. The free negroes of Africa were averse to emigrating, and he thoughttheFreneh Government would have some difficulty in obtaining really free emigrants. He cotild not believe that the • French Government, having abolished the slave-trade, would do anything that would lead to its revival. In re ply to Sir E. Buxton, the noble lord said that her Ma jesty's Government had received information, though not authentic, of the emigration of negroes from the east coast of Africa to the Isle of Bourbon, bat he was not in a po,itien •to state the extent to which it bad gone or in what manner the negroes had been obtained. - The motion for adjoninment was then agreed to. PROBATE AND LETTERS OF ADMINISTRA TION OF WILLS BILL. The house went into committee ou this bill. .Tue ATTORNEY-GENERAL adverted to the de feat the Government had sustained the other night, when the committee, in opposition to his wieb, carried an amendment empowering personal property of all kinds to be dealt with in the country districts. That arrangement, he believed, would open the way to much fraud, and therefore he could not give his sanction to it. But he would propose this compromise ; let the committee negative the clause as it at present stood, on the under. standing that he would afterwards bring up a clause giving the district courts power to deal with wile to the extent of 3,0001., but excluding property in the funds, railway Ames, &c. If the house agreed to the principle of this clause he would not resist going to a still further extent, though he thought that was as Jar as they could go with propriety. Mr. WESTHEAD, as the mover of the successful amendment, would not object to the principle, but it was preposterous to talk of 3,0001. as the limit. He quoted from a list of the wills proved at York, from which it appeared that 200 wills, where the personal pro perty was sworn under 10,0001. had been proved within the last five yeE.re. For himself, he could not see where there was more chance of fraud in the country Abell in London. ' i 1 __ t.. _ 1 ~. ~ LONDON, SA rU it DAY EVENING, J ULY 11, 1857. GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY.- EXCURSIONS TO TIM SEA-SIDE. Family Tickets to WEYMOUTH are now issued at very Reduced Fares ; the partivulars of which will be given on application at the Padd'ugton Station, or at the Company's offices. • AWIDOW LADY, 'agei 40, is desirous of engaging herself as Companion to a Lady, or as House keeper to a Gentleman, or to superintend the bringing up of Ta o or Three Young Children. A comfortable home is the Advertiser's primary object—Address 13.1%,-Messrs. Mann; 39, Cornhill, E.Q. r THE RHINE : AND GERMANY.—The Shortest and Cheapest Route, via, Rotterdam,. to the Rhine and Germany, is by TILE DUTCH RiIENISH RAILWAY. Through Trolly', in conjunction with those of the Cologne-Minden Company, start three times a day. Fifty pounds of Luggage allowed free for each passenger. Further particulars f,rwardcd, post tree, - on application to the company', London Agent, Mr. Joni C. JANSON, 61, Gracechurch street. 1 because the appeal was made a.amuchto Jewish sympathy as to Christian, and the word was struck out. Would not that happen in the Legisleture? The Jew would object to the word Christian being used, and that he (the Earl of Derby) would call unchristianieing the Legislature. It was add that infidels could enter the Legislature. So they could if they forswore themselves, but that the Legisla ture could not guard against, but it could declare that a'l who entered the Legislature should do so on a Chris tian declaration. Her Majesty's . Government have thought proper to take a course wnich . might embarrass many of their lordships. He so far approved of the bill. in so far as it amended the oath. Ho had been told that - a Roman Catholic deputation hal waited upon the noble lord at the head of the Government, requiring him to alter the oath with regard to the Roman Catholics. The answer of the noble herd was that he could not do that —he could not amend the position of the Oath ilic, but he did not mind making the Jews' position worse. (Laughter.) . The Duke of NORFOLK—Nothing of the sort. The Earl of DERBY—At all events the noble lord declined to accede to the request of the deputation. The course which the Government had taken was to attempt to force the House of Lords. His noble friend had hoped that no declaration would be made with regard to maiii. taining the independence of the House of Lords. Now be (the Earl of Derby) hoped that their lordships would not shrink from maintaining their independence on this occa. sion. No doubt there were OCC"SiOOF when it was neces sary to act in opposition to that which they felt was ab. stractedly right. That could only be justified when there were formidable dangers to be apprehended, such as in the case of the. Roman Catholic Relief Bill, or the Reform Bill, and, he might, perhaps, add the repeal of the corn laws. He believed that open this sulject their lordships' minds were made up, and he trusted that they would reject the comprhmise and contradictions which were contained in this bill. It was on these grounds that he ventured to move that the bib be read a second time that day six months. Lord LYNDHURST said that no one admired more sincerely than himself the eloquence of the noble lord. If splendid declamation could settle the question it would hive no chance. But he lad been too long familiar with that house to - expect that the question would ebb settled on such grounds, The oenfidence he felt in the . liberality and imdepsndence of their lor4alsiass a Aaed se isbeist tlatitapricciole of justice on which the measure was founded, encouragecr him to enter freely into the arguments which had been urged against it. As to the facts on which the case de pended, they might be stated in a very few words. He would go back to the revolution of 1688. That great event caused at the very outset of the reign of King 'Willirm a change in the system of oaths. An oath o I allegiance of a most cumbrous firm and an oath of su premacy had been enacted in the reign of James 11. The oath.of allegiance, which contained for the first time the words, "On the true faith of a Christian," wee passed in the reign cf James ll. ' and tvae in the begin ning of William's reign repealed, and the oath was put in that simple form in which it was handed down to the present time. He then came to the other oath—that of supremacy. That oath hail two Farts, the one positive and the other negative. The first asserted the supre macy of the Crown ; the other denied that any foreign prince or potentate had any authority within these realms. Durirg the latter part of the reign of William 111. the only oath necessary was the oath of allegiance. In the first year of William tie crown was settled by act of Parliament, but it was rot thought requisite to take any oath. But in the twelfth year of William, in consequence of the death of Queen Mary and the Duke of Gloucester. a new settlement became neoessary, and the crown was settled in the House . of Hanover. No oath however, was even then th cught necessary, except ofativnpart of the oath James 11. of supremacy William, the oathofal . le g Ini an a e the andlas last year a n r e died, and his son assumed the title of King of England. Ho was supported by the French monarch. Steps were taken to enforce the claim, and then it was that the pre sent oath of abjuration was established to prevent the claims upon the Crown oft s e descendants of James 11. That oath had come down to us, but the cause had ceased, and the simplest plan would seem to be to repeal the oath, and to leave the other two oaths as they etood in the reign of King William. This was the natural course of things, the cause of the oath having passed passed away. By the bill before them, the oath of supre macy and allegiance, as in the reign of William 111. was re-enacted, but an additional clause was introduced confirming the succession to the Crown. Now, if that was not necessary in the troublesome times of William 111., how could it be necessary in these tranquil times I But, in defereuce to the opinions of certain persons, this clause had been introduced into the bill. The three oaths Were thus amalgamated into one. Wh - at possible objec tion could there be to such a course ? It was said that they ough% to add to the oaths as they existed in the time of King William. Why, it should be asked ? What were the words they wished to add ? " Without equivocation," and "on the tree faith of a Christian." Those words were once introduced to meet a contingency which had long passed away, as more binding en the Roman Catholics. If they were to be inserted in the bill for that object it had ceased.. The Roman Catholics were not obliged to take the oath at all. The words had been deliberately expunged in the reign of King William. It was a folly to talk of inserting words- wh:ch had now no applicatioh. But it came to this—that the words were to be inserted for the purpose of excluding the Jews from Parliament. What was the posi tion of the Jews ? His noble and learned friend said they were aliens. They Vare not aliens, they never had been aliene. The Jews that came over le the reign of Charles 11, were aliene, they were born abroad, but to say that the Jewa of the present day, who.wera born in England, were aliens, was contrary to the law At the close of the seventeenth century, the opinion of the law officers of the Crown, Lord Talbot among them, Was' taken, and it was decided that they were not aliens ; that they might hold lands like any other persons. If these men were to be exela led from the n atural right of citi zens, they should introduce a bill expressly for that purpose. The Jews had a aight.to have their claims examined by the Legislature and by the Crown. This would be the constitutional course. Instead of which it was sought to exclude them by a side-wind a and that too not of the entire legislature, but by that .branch which was not the direct representatives of the people. This was not a constitutional •course. One of our most eminent legal authorities bad said that if the Jews were to be excluded it should not be by a side-wind but by . a direct act of Pare liament. He could not make up his mind as to the reasons by which their lordships should put in these words. They could not put them in to exclude the Catholics er the natural born subjects of England. They should ex clude those by a direct art, and if they did otherwise it would be an unconstitutional course of proceeding. It was said that the Jews had always been excluded. Why, they were never thought of. The argument came to this, that if they had been thought aif they would have been excluded. In this care the facts were all con clusive against-such a supposition. Then a noble friend of his said that, without these Rods, they would unchristianise the legislature. How unchristianise ? Did the christianity of t',e Country depend upon an oath I (Hear, hear.) He should be glad if his noble friend could have put himself in communication with those treat men by w h o m our Revolution had been effected. What reception wo uld be have met with from Somers, Halifax, et* the other great men of that day if he had used such an argument I They would have turned their backs upon the argumentas ridiculous. Did William 111. or his Parliament unchristainise the Lee islature I Was his Parliament less Christian than the ;tor Pliament governed by Bolingbroke—a professed Deist than the Parliament of Charles 11. I Was the Parliament of James, when these words were in serted, more Christian than William I The words when considered in this light became a m ockery. His noble friend touched upon another point which bad been urged against the till. He said that it was inconsistent in a Cbristi n legislature to admit the Jews. Now, this was one of the great arguments on the other side. A. Legislature ought to represent the Gauntry. Were there no Jews in the country ! Were there no eubjects of her Majesty ? If this Christian' country contained some Jews amongst its people, what inconsistency was there in the Legislature including Jews in the same proportion ? A representative body ought to embody the constituent body, Were not the courts of justice Christian I The municipal cor porations Christian I Were these less Christian now that Jews were admitted among them 'I A Christian court and a Christian corporation might be and had been presided over by a gentleman of the Jewish persuasion. If it was a principle that Jews were not to form part of the Christian Legislature, let them see how that prin ciple had been acted upon. Above all things principles should be consistent. What was the course they had pursued ? They had persisted in framing a constitution for Canada. Many of the right rev, prelates were pre sent that had that constitution before them, and framed it according to their own views. Yet it did not exclude the Jews: Was nos the legislation of Canada as Chris tian as our own I (Rear, hear.) A people of the Jew ish persuasion sat in that legislature, and were among the most distinguished members of its body. How weriathey to reconcile them with the present argument ? But it might be said this was an oversight. Let them then go to Australia. -Was not Australia Christian? Were they to value Christianity more in one part of the empire than another; They had framed a constitution for Aus• tralia—did they there exclude the Jews I He might al lude to Now Zealand and the Cape of Good Hope, and elsewhere, w h e re an attempt was made to exclude the Jews. The house had a constant consciousness that they ought not direc'ly to proclaim their principle, so they endeavoured to EstAblish ieby a side wind. An argument had been introduced elsewhere by an excellent friend of his, in the House of Commons, and the proposition was receiard with cheers. It was this, that the question was one not of religious liberty, but a question of power. Let them analtse this. What was, in this sense, religious liberty ? It would mean nothing more than religious to leration. Would any ono here define religious liberty to be religious toleration ? That doctrine had been long ex ploded. The doctrine of the present day was, that the opinions of no wan, unless they involved dangerous do& trines, ought to exclude him from civil office. A bill introduced by the learned lord on the woolsack, pro claimed by the preamble the principle that no man should be excluded by his creed from civil employment. The bill was submitted to the law commission of the Crown, which returned it with some of its provisions altered, but with the preamble unaltered - . It was well known that Christians were not allowed to hold offices in the _Turkish dominions. His noble friend the ambassador at Constantinople remonstrated with the Turks, and told them that their exclusion was not in conformity with justice, and the Turkish Government yielded. Their oondect had received the full approbation of Par liament. And were they not to act upon the same principle themselves ? If they w ere to suffer their pre judices and interests to interfere, they woull he charged with gross lypocrisy. (Reale) No one pretended to say that, in point of talent, information, or in other re spects, the gentlemen of the Jewish persuasion were not equal to others. We had put them upon their trial. They had aceiii.as magistrates, as members of muni cipal councib, and the result bad been satisfactory. But he had heard it often argued, .both there and in the other home, how could a Jew vote on questions of religion ? Of course they could not interfere in ques tions of doctrine. But he would give a more satisfactory answer. He ramemberee when the same argument was raised against the admission of Roman Catholics to offide—it was more plausible in that case. He himself had taken part in the discussion, and he remem bered the impression this argument made on his own mind., It was then said that the Roman Catholics were proselytizers—that they endeavoured to subvert our re ligion—that they were subject to a foreign n dentate. All these were weighty arguments, but they declared that the great principles of reason and. justice should triumph. Thes did triumph ; the bill passed ; and all the fears turned out groundless. For the Jaws, did they , wish t o make converts ? Did they not respect our reli gion ? Were they subjects of a foreign sovereign ? In all these cases it was quite -the reverse. It was twenty-five years since a similar measure was introduced, in a speech of great tdent, by a learned friend of hie, of whom he might say, that there never was a more sincere friend of civil and religious liberty. Since that time, in successive Parliaments, the motion had been carried by increasing majorities. He found in those majorities men of high talent, great learn ing, great philosophers. On the last occasion—at the dissolution—the subject was presented to the different constituencies of the country, and in the metropolis a member of the Jewish faith was returned by a majority above that of the noble lord who had fought their battle. Toe noble lord would consider this a mark of the strength of its cause. Ceethe recent division Oh- majority nearly_ doubled that ofany-fOriner'occasion. These things were not to be lightly considered. The relative duties of the two houses were the!e—the one representing directly, the other circuitously, the people ; it was the duty of that house to serve. as a check against the rash, unwise, and hasty decisions of the other house, and to give time for consideration, but he had never considered that house should be the continuous barrier against advancing legis lation that must lead to a conflict, and in that conflict unless they were backed by a great majority of the peo ple they must once more succumb. Ile had been for more than 30 years a member of their lordship's house, and had taken an active part in all the measures for the extension of religious freedom, of some of which he had been the originator. He was, therefore, justified in the course be was pursuing. Let them not lag behind the other parties in the State, but assert their former posi tion, and stand forward, as they had ever done, the bul warks of civil and religious liberty. The Earl WINCHELSEA. gave his most cordial sup port to the amendment. The Duke of SOMERSET said-that all the alarms which had been . raised on questions affecting civil and religious liberty had tended to the material prosperity of the country. When the Catholics were emancipated, there was an outcry of this nature, but subsequent events had shown how fallacious it' was. He believed there was as little apprehension with replied to' the results of the present bill, the objects of which' had been before Parliament for 25 years. The Duke of NORFOLK said that, however the bill might be framed, he considered that it embodied the principle of the admission of Jews into Parliament. Of that principle he entirely approved, as one of justice and expediency. It was in accordance with the establish ment of - that principle that he owed the privilege he possessed of now addressing their lordships. At the same time there were many objections to the bill, which he should seek to remove in committee. Lord DUNGANNON said that if a measure of this sort ever passed, be should suspect that the foundations of the Christian faith would be destroyed. Lord CAMOYS, as a Roman Catholic peer, gave his cordial assent to the bill. is Lord DE VESCI thought that the :measure could never be productive of any political evil either to the Church or community in general, and he should there fore support it. He thought that the Christian character of the Legislature must depend not upon any particular form ql oath, but upon the Christian profession of tba Sovereign, and the other two branches of the Legis lature.. The attempt to make the 1-gislative assem blies cf this country Christian by any particular form of oath, appeared to him to be quite a superfluous precaution.' (Hear, hear.) He should feel bound to vote fur the second reading of the bill. Lord St. VlNCENT.opposed the bill. Lord DUFFFERIN suoported it. The Bishop of-LONDON could. not consent to give a silent vote on this question. There was a strong feel ing that the religion of the legislature was involved in this proposal to remove the disabilities of the Jews. For many years past be had paid considerable attention to the subject, but he was not able to convince himself of the force of any argument founded upon that opinipn. (Hear.) . It had been said that the prayers at the com mencement of the legislative business could not be con tinued if the Jews were to-be admitted into Parliament ; but ho bad not h.ar'd that any objections had - ever been made by Roman Catholic members to the use of tbel-e -prayers by those whom they considered to be heretics ; and if.tbat large body, of persons did not object to the use of such prayers, what ground was there for supposing that it would be necessary to abandon them of the appearance of one or two Jews in Parlia ment. He had seen no reason whatever to suppose that this measure would lead to the unchristianising the Le gislature, but it was impossible to contend that this coun try was now less religious than it was 25 years since, when we commenced to remove the most grievous of the disabilities from the members of the Jewish profession. The simple ground on which he should give his vote in favour of the bill was that of justice, and believing that the presence of Jews could not prevent their lordships from expressing their opinion without restraint on Chris tian subjects, he looked upon their admission to one or other of the branches of the Legislature as an act of jus tice. He should vote in favour of the second reading of the bill.' The Archbishop of CANTERBURY regretted that he felt compelled to come to an opinion directly opposite to that at whiCh his right rev. brother had arrived with respect to the admission of Jews into the Legislature. There was no vote which he gave with greater reluctance or pain than that which it bad been his duty on several occasions to record against the bill for enabling them to take part in the legislation of the country. In coming to this conclusion he was actuated by nothing like a spirit of persecution, but was influenced only by a strong conviction that a Christian country ought to be governed by a Christian legislature. (Hear.) Entertaining this conscientious opinion, he should feel it his duty again to resort his vote in opposition to the further progress of the measure. (Hear.) The Eael of ALBERMARLE supported the bill, and instanced the good effect which bad resulted in America from its tolerant policy respecting the Jews ; and, among other things, he stated that half of the Jewish popula tion of Bavaria had left that country, and had thus en. ricked America, and beggared bigotted Bavaria. It would be well for this country that it should not be found in company with such a miserable and petty State as Bavaria in our treatment of the Jews. (Hear.) The Earl of SHAFTESBURY had always been op posed to the admission of Jews into Parliament, and was still of the same opinion ; but could notgive her vote against the second reading of a bill which proposed to get rid of such absurd and almost blasphemous oaths as those now required to be eaken by members of Parlia ment. Feeling, as he did, so strong an opinion on this subject, he would, at all hazards and all risks, vote in favour of the bill, for the purpose of effecting a change in the absurd oaths now required by law to be taken, reserving to himself the right of moving or supporting such amendments in committee as he might think fit, respecting the words which precluded the Jews from holding a seat in Parliament. Lord BROUGHAM contrasted the conduct of the noble lord who had last spoken, in deciding to sup port the second reading of the bill, with that of the noble lord who bad moved the amendment, who, holdingstrong opinions as to the absurdity and outrage on common sense and decorum perpetrated by the cw;sting oath, had still thought fit to give a negative to the whohe bill, rather than seek to effect amendments of de tails in committee. What was complained of by those who supported the bill was not that the Jews had not the right to take part in the Government of the country, but that these persons, being eligible in other respects, were declared upon religious grounds to be ineligible for the offices which they would otherwise have a right to hold. He entertained very strong opinions in favour of this proposal, and he trusted that their lordships would sanc tion the second reading of the bill. It had been said that if the bill were to pais it would un-Christianise the Legislature. If their lordships were to reject this bill, their position would no doubt be a most gracious one ; but what would become of their colleagues in legis lation—the House of Commons—if this theory were true. They had by a very large majority nn-Christianised themselves, and they must be, he did not like to say, on the high road to perdition. God forbid that he should send d sh a i n p y s b w od o y ul o d n the stillsti c such be a i n c course--(a mostr s e (a comfortablel laugh)—but u gb)baunt d their ga Mous state if they passed the bill. W hat became, to k of the great importance attached to t he words, " t true faith of a Christian," as a bulwa rk to the On Christia nity of the country, when it was a fact that Roman C atholic peers and members of Par liament we not called u i of the oath, furnished stro n g evidence that there was no p co o no n i t t ch o he a r t it asr Christian. t t(h,t heirolaf laugh ag e t hc h . ) s h r t i h Ts t a hi t ae n t o h , n e , an sete o e er i a t rt h lh e ye r h C wi a sot t ro b dr o sy: fai intention to exclude the Jew, and this point the noble earl who seconded the amendment had entirely omitted to notice in one of the most judicious—(a laugh)—and skilful speeches whioh he (Lord Brougham) had ever IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF LORDS.-(YESTERDAY.) The Lono CII4NCELLOB took his seat on the woolsack at. five o'clock. Lord LEIGH presented a petition from Birmingbam in ft4our of the Oaths Bill. Lord WINCHELSEA presented petitions against the bill. The 'Marquis of. Lansdowne, Earl Granviil-, Earl Fortescue, Earl of Albemarle, and L')rd Brougham pre seated petitions in favour of the removal of Jewish Disa bilities. - OATHS BILL. , Earl GRANVILLE, before moving the second read ing of this bill, moved that the oaths of abjuration now taken by their lordships-should be read by the clerk of the house. - Mr. EDMONDS, the Clerk of the House, then read the oath of abjuration. , •_. - - Ear, G - RANVILLE thee moved the second read ing of the bill, tied Paid it devolved upon him to dis charge a duty which be felt was one of great difficulty. Ile was afraid he should be accused of presump tion in re-introducing a subject on which an .opi rico had been so recently pronounced. The 4ject of the bill was to amend-the meths now required to beefairen-ea oaths which all their lordships had taken, :arid which had just been read by the clerk—oaths which he believed to be incongruous and anomalous. It was proposed by, the present measure to simplify and amend those oaths. He believed it was impossible to avoid coming to any other conclusion than that their lordships at present took an unnecessary oath, and thereby com mitted a most serious offence by taking the name of God in vain. The oath which it was proposed to abolish was that in 'which they swore to protect the Crown from a family which all knew no longer teested. (Hear.) That was a vain oath, and therefore ought not to be taken. There was no doubt a collateral advantage to be obtained by the proposed measure, namely, the admission of- Jews to Parliament, which they had hitherto been deprived of owing to their con- Fele :Vous scruples. He did not think it fair or just that they should apply the accidental addition of certain words to the oath to the purpose of excluding the Jews from Parliament. He bad no hesitation in characterising such a proceeding to be a system of per secution which was intolerable, as it was set against a section of the population which was distinguished for their loyalty to the Sovereign, for their conscien tious adherence to their religieus opinions, and for all the qualifications which constituted good citi zens. He called upon their lordships to sanction this measure on the ground of toleration, on the ground of right, because he believed it contrary to :the Constitu tion to exclude persons from the exercise of their civil rights on account of their religious opinions. He was utterly at a loss to understand why the admission of a few Jews to Parliament, sent there by purely Chris tian constituencies, could in the slightest degree uncnris tianise the Legislature—(hear, bear)—and he there fore trusted that their lordships would not allow themselves to be led away by that specious cry. So far from the admission of the Jews unchris tianising the Legislature, he was quite of the contrary opinion ; he thought it would largely strengthen both its principles and character, by displaying the utmost toleration towards our Jewish brethren. The noble lord then proceeded to answer the objections that bad been raised against the principle involved in the bill, and warned their lordships against being moved by a spirit of independence of the other house in voting against this bill. He then referred to the distinguished support which the measure obtained, and said he firmly believed that the people of England were in favour of the bill. If the bill went into committee he would state the rea sons why he thought it desirable to retain the form of oath now proposed, and the question could then be dis cussed, and any proposal made by noble lords as to further alteration of the oath, would receive the atten tion of their lordships. It had been stated that their lordships would seize with avidity any attempt to show their independence of the other house, and were able to do this with impunity, because the great ma jority of the House of Commons were not supported by the passionate appeals of the public out of doors. He did not think such a feeling would have any influ ence with their lordships. There were occasions when the House of Peers might interpose between the Com mons and the people by giving time for calm consider ation, which the delay of measures might give an op. portunity for. In the case of this bill, the cool and deliberate judgment of the people of England was in favour of the measure, and, in support of that opinion, be referred to the great majority of members of the House of Cornmens recently returned to Parliament, who had voted in favour of the bill, and which included two of the most able friends of the noble lord (Lord Derby), who formerly held office in his Government. He concluded by urging upon their lordships to give a second reading to this bill as an act of simple jus tice. The Earl of DERBY said there - were two totally diffe rent subjects before their lordehipe. The one as to the expediency of admitting members of :the Jewish nation into this Christian Legislature; and the other, the alte ration of the oaths which were taken by members of the Legislature. The noble earl who had just spoken alluded to the first as being a merely collateral advantage, but he (the Earl of Derby) ventured to say that was not the principle upon which the Governmett had considered this bill. (Hear.) They had, no doubt, considered it a primary advantage. He would not follow the noble earl at length into his arguments with regard to the position of the Jews. There could be no doubt that, scattered as they were over the whole world by Divine decree, they hoped, at some future day, to recover their nationality. They were a nation within another nation, and in this' country they were entrusted with the adminis tration of the laws,• but they were refused in this country to be makers of the laws. Though amongst us, they were not of us. They had interests, their greatest principles were altogether alien to us. They were aliens in blood, in religion, and in language, as had once been said with regard to another class. The arguments upon this subject had been urged over and over again, and most of their lordships were of a mature age and must have come to a conclusion upon this iub• ject. The whole case lay in a nutshell. There was one argument which he was surprised had been again that night introduced—that the denial of certain rights was a remnant of persecution. The noble earl bad omitted to state what were meant by rights. The Jew had no right to claim as a right the power to legislate. That was a privilege and net a right, and had always been surrounded by conditions. As to the argument about the words "on the true faith of a Christian" not having been intended to apply to the Jews only when these words were first adopted, the Jews were not allowed to be in the country at all. They had been banished for 250 years before. At that time the Jews were petitioning to be allowed to come into the country, and ;,therefore it was futile to argue that the words were not intended to exclude persons from Par liament who were not allowed to come into the country. Why, there was overwhelming evidence that the mind and the intention of the legislature was, that no Jew should be allowed to sit in Parlia -sent. For many years afterwards they were treated as aliens, and up to a very recent period it was necessary for a person to sit in Parliament that he should bold a landed qualification, and up to 1846 it was, doubtful whether a Jew could hold land at all. Was it wonderful, then, that no specific clause could be found excluding the Jew, when by the common law the Jew was excluded from all these privileges. Why, io 1828, when the Test and Corporation Acts were passed, the wcrds "on the true faith of a Christian" were retained avowedly for the purpose of excluding Jews, and yet we were to be told that those words, as far as a seat in Parliament was concerned, were merely an accident. But if it was pers cution to say that a man should not sit in Par liament, surely it was persecution to say he should not be Lord Chancellor. If the Jew was entitled to all the rights and privileges of citizens, why should he be ex eluded from the highest offices ? There were other offices from which he ought to be excluded which were not named in the bill. He (Lord Derby) would not feel com fortable in seeing a Jew as Chancellor of the Exchequer (laughter)—aud yet, under this bill, a Jew might be come a Chancellor of the Exchequer. He might become First Lord of the Treasury, and by this bill he would be debarred from giving advice to the Crown on the sub jeat of Church preferments. In this case, now, if a Jew b ec ame Prime Minister, who was to advise the Crown on these•subjects ? Ile would like to know the real history. of the clause containing these exclusions. When the bill was in the Hen-e of Commons, it was euggested that these clauees should be introduced, when the noble level at the head of the Government, in his off-hand way, said that this was not a bill of pains and penalties, and the Government would oppose such a suggestion, and yet within a week he came down and said that Government, on reconsideration, intended to intro duce the clauses, Now, that was playing fast and loose with a great question. His noble friend bad asked him what he meant by the term unchristianise the Legislature. Now, he did not know that he had used that expression; but be theuslat it was clear what was meant. A strong instance of what was meant occurred some years ago. An appeal was made to the country on behalf of a cha rity,the appeal was addressed to the Christian sym . atb and yof the country. A. well-known Jewish gentleman, we ll knowufor his charity, objected to the word Chrietiau INDIA. Mr. NOEL asked the Under Secretary for War whether the Government would give to those of her Majesty's Officers who were ordered to rejoin their regi ments in India before the expiration of their leave, on account of the mutiny in that country, a free passage, or whether they would be compelled to return there at their own expense! Sir J. RA.MSDEN said that the subject was at pre sent under the consideration of the War Office and the India Board. lie was unabla then to give an answer to the question. PROBATES, &c, BILL. Sir J. TROLLOPE asked the Attorney-General, if after calm reflection, be intended to proceed with the probates and letters of administration bill `I The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that the ques tion did not require calm consideration, and be thought it was answered by the paper containing the order for to-night. (Hear, hear.) It was proverbial that the House of Commons was not obstinate, and he thought they would not obstinately adhere to the deci sion come to on a former night with reference to the bill. (Laughter.) CHINA. Sir J. PAKINGTON asked the First Lord of the Treasury the following questions, let, Whether any re s ent intelligence had been received as to the position and proceedings of her Majesty's forces / 2dly, Whether her Majesty's Government had sent out any instructions, empowering the Indian Government to divert from their destination the troops which bad been sent from this country to China, and employ them in India! 311 y, If no such instructions had been sent, whether it were true that the Governor-Gene ral of India had, of bis own authority, acting under the pressure of events in that country, sent orders to Ceylon that the forces sent from this country to China, were, on their arrival at Ceylon, to proceed to India! And, fourthly, whether her Majesty's Government were prepared to state, in the event of its being intended that the troops sent to China should be immediately em ployed in India, what course they proposed to take for strengthening the British Forces in China I Sir C. WOOD, in the absence of the First Lord of the Treasury, said that when the last advices left China on 10th May, thing/remained very much in the same state, no further hostilities having taken place. The right hon, baronet, who was exceedingly indistinct, was un• derstood to answer the other questions in the negative. SUPPLY; Sir WIL LOUGHBY asked what branch of the estimates it was intended to take in committee of supply on Monday night, and when No. 7, m iscellaneous esti mates would be placed on the table o f the house ? The CHANCELLOR , of the EXCHEQUER said he would answer the question before the rising of the house. DIVORCE, ac., BILL. Monday ? Government to to proceed LEYaskedwiifthitur d Sir C. WOOD —Certainly net on Mon da y ni g ht. &n.i, the 0 TRANSM ISSION OF TROOP S TO INDIA. Oa the motion for t he adjournment of the house till Monday, Capta i n VIVIAN aske d the President of the Board of Control whet her it was the intention of her Majesty's V. SMITH M d l i 'l' sa il str s o a u id s th u a e t ws arra w n a g s eme r n e t e s ei w ve e d re made from iv h o e r c i e n , te o to Gov b e a r r e k u t i o erntlntdoia sendin sailing troops ships? which were about to Mr. i ern before for sending out 10,000 troops to India for the purposes of relief in sailing vessels. They would proceed this month to their destination. When the news arrived from India, the East India Company applied to the Government hr 4,000 additional troops, and it had been arranged to send 2,000 of them out in screw vessels, and 2,000 in sailing vessels. Sir C. NAPIER regretted the Government had sent any of the troops by sailing vessels to India. The subject then dropped. DISTRIBUTION OF MEDALS. Colonel NORTH asked the Under Secretary of War when the Turkish Order of the Medjidi, the Sardinian Military Medal, and the Turkish Medal for officers and men are to be distributed to those entitled to them Sir J. RA.MSDEN said that the Government of this country had done all that was required of them in reela tion to the Turkish Order , The Sardinian medals were FRIDAY, 2i. The general show -yard open to the public fr m Six o'clock in the morning till Six in the evening; admission ls. each person. Public trials of the steam cultivators, on land in the neighbour hood of the city, during such hours as the Stewards may determine. General Meeting of the Members, in the Council Chamber, at Ten o'cl ck in the foreno n FARMING.—The Right Hon. Sidney Herbert, M.P., has placed his home-farm, at Wilton, near Salisbury, at the disposal of the Society, for the inspection of the members, on Tuesday, the 21st of July, at Twelve o'clock; and Mr. 4tephen Mills, of Elston House, twelve miles from Salisbury, has expressed his willingness to receive such of the members at an inspection of his farms, and to explain to them personally the system of Wiltsh re light•land farming, as may be furnished with tickets from the Secretary of the Society. DIRIGATION.—M essrs. Rawlence and quare) have made arrange ments for the inspection of their water-meadows, near Salisbury, by the members of the Society, on Tuesday, the 21st ofJuly, at Twelve o'clock ; and for the resdirg of a paper on their construction and management, by Mr. Fnuarey, in the Council Chamber, on the same evening, at Eight o'clock. NEW SERIAL BY THE AUTHOR OF " HARRY LORREQUER." In Monthly Numbers. Just published, Number 3., price Is., of DIVENPORT DUNN A MAN OF OUR DAY. By. CHARLES LEVER. With Illustr,tions by . " PHIZ." Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly. eza. I