The Sun. — London, England, 1817-05-17 00:00:00

t kle 11 . . 4 ttit . Ritrohon to all that I,al been its*ell by Ell! ; and he tvas ready to 'admit.; inost favourable to the petitioners . ; that egoilitv t noi r e n , 7 .0 ought to depend upon o il li ettY and worth. But before their illiellretinietn a_tlecision on the claims of the I vo ' , the Y must inquire whether there may' i ale religions tenets, the holding of which ' a Imatt better qualified to serve the nae who does not hold them, Let it , what i s t h e nature Of the ' civil ca 'red by our Conitiftition ? The alle 'robe!' of the' Established Church is 1 ' in a religious and a civil point of civil hliegi3nce of a Protestant Dis pill , . not , ~ not equally comptete, is sun lilaalifying it deduction as that of a ' li e. It Protestant Dissenters refuse Age the Sovereign as the head of their cr if , they have any other.. headi that 3 foreigner, or a person who has no iller c't with the Government of the no twithstanding this attontally, it obedience given to. the Pope . 'al, and never interfered with 'tent. 'Here he most remark, apinioni it was not always easy lat. was temporal and what civil. ' therefore, 'could not decide this taking religion into account.— ... that on many points connect - fi "n ' , lie petitioners themselVes en as to whether they involved civil Patrons. . Now to whom hart the ' , y to solve their doubts ? To which was essentially iirecon temporal power of their own Go lf the decisions of that power ;tent with their civil duties, was 'Preheuded that the latter would fritter? 'll, c comman d s of con always hav e a most powerliil in," 0111 bound by the oblittiluts of those held by Roman Catholics' Y, by arlomwlegiog; a foreit, , ,n to he acted t , pon by foreign in /,°lll'l. Perhap s b e sa id, t h a t th e se ot etntsktent with the enlightened ulcer times ; hut what Was Coal nlightened policy was not always a ' , d Pulley. He might be reterred 'he told that there Ptotestatits are 41 " t kilnstion of.equal political rights a" Cathidies ; but he hoist obsvrve w " very different between the ad '''nestatits to political power itt a the Church of ft nose formed the tlO and the admiiihion of Roman Ca e privilege under it Protestant Go. 'e Protestant owed no ,illegiance ' ll ntent of his-country : not so the "owdly owes allegiance to a to. w hose e views are hostile to the sys °Y which the domestic Prince it P e titioners, who now apply it; he t 'lli4l footi n g o f eligibility with pro ) give an equal pledge of allegiance. he admitted ; but if their. religions `t them fr'o m giving the same pert , ct 'giance,.t hen they are not equal in ei l ) , 4 eity and worth, and consetlen , - oCregartted as etfitslly futniissible I. or to.,seats, in the cot neils of ai.,•iv o r te 441 not mean, ro say that Roman t '''' fo r k . bid subjects • all that he meant to 1r e t', that, politically that ilia, they - ‘ 44 1;;;; 4) (1 as Pro testants. lie was ready anti integrity as 4 4, 4 ;41?e their honour • • . l ' hi:': (l ividuals : many of them were en .''iti,(ll-,)"iitheir respect, but the allegiance at ,'t fureign Prince counteracted that ~. w n ~ , grit, i - ‘, 0 tIIVIr own Sovereign, and len: a E st r l4 fi t to he admitted to offices of fltil " te atailt country than those . who t Fete 411,,*i0n of the State. After having Fit • . sty f4l principles, it b li tv ! ts hardly ne c,tavet,'►at to enter into details. He Tit Cr ' - sa a A le iiii , Y few words on the s ubject tteptio titillation. in his opinion it was riistill,;(llbetiler the election of Bishops was, ' wilt k l a Chapter or, entirely of Bishops. ri l *i t h oi l l 'awn 1 t aat a Chapter may obey a At 4 44l Ati i t l'a'ir ' !; any choice : still, t'.,,'l o,,,:'terterence was to he apprehended. how it,ifilt„, 14 ine was told, the co+ tom Was for the .. ,jrti; l',. )e tee Culltnetttletl to the vacant See, ,' i lt h i l it " l ll t e to confirm. 7 -(Here there was a 5 b ,:r, , 1 1 ,,,, 0re i` Order !" in consequence of Lord t' t "ti, lo i. l ' 3 , vitlit risen from Ills seat, and at " iNt o lsim ( te,sl the House.) 6e l4, rti:; /(1 ) it Aqui' perfectly out of order to, hi'. k+l.,t4l.,l)oNr;ii.wltieht Reverend Prelates. 'tt j . ,, ili,, t , .7 1 ,441 I rtil )Rli said, he did not rite from 1 14 1,1,44 44 e '..t t(1 the Riot Reverend Prelate, but he ttlin„;itth,d, glut the point of domestic nominator' ti 4l ' l ll o ° f 'l"ltThArr resitined.—He said that the , I 4 t. 1 teo Nil .1 . 0 Q , 11 4 P rote 4 t l l intitictice in the attachment of , s 4 ,1 , ( ,,,, e '',,, ing, when they saw the oath of • - • , ,t, 4, 4 , 11T c ii i l r ri , which they to o k t t their consecration. , I' ll !i,h ,ol liabl h li P". 4l to break down those securities ' 4 4 1 .' 4 . 44,tc'e!which the wisdom of their ancestors 1 ,,, 4 _ ‘t. %telt it h a x r,„" t p !once btolten down, swim . . , t iii;o o t , ," be able to restore. Itil*ltici, ii Nottwt cif was aware ti 1 l' i tve s clue to the opinionsof the of 'the N e., tv iat , wi 0 . le tii ti %e t come i trail just, sat down, H . e 04,, 1 , th' e ~_ td, tlitt the Rom an Catholics i,,:r„elty . ,',"'lst unequivocal proofs of their , t i ni t t "eh' claims, he thought, s ent" ' tOt t fleet i , t ti 4 t • ••et, ocean h i ed t , ent er i„, se of their attachment 0, 14 t oeto i n 18 ' n us opinions of their ancestors. li, et r "t!neent, th ough with Protestants ti rk 'il h -Naril e d a ~4 , i i,14 t, e,1 hod , s erroneous., 'niece op.i , ti , 'N or 1 , uy Our ancestors, who laid • ~,,ty, , v , r "ht political liberty we now en i,.. A t ; 1 ::14 0 e the opinions of most of the 3 / 4 S• 4ll illi h i)" .. !. With %%limn we were . happily l lt !e4 ilt ct r ,. :r i. !; and they were the.opinions 1,14i14.1111,,,I);1.e Noblemen and Gentlemen 11 4 ° Of i , toady Who heard him were in `4i I Ito 1" " )41 Y ttr 1 ' , N i l ~ rtitt o e a ., . ittendsitip. They all ' 7 '4l„ "ein, ei "'nnts, in all the relations of i,„k Rti t , i "t AS Worth n b •of fin liri Itlei Sithi e ., , y lem els . i t ,. r e r rs; , J .iias protestants.'Ailith 4N' Pat i , i'' Pacity, the 'di fferent Acts of 1 th e 1 ' (luri ng th, . ~o d„ lece w . i present reign saved o , it l; t , "Y of arguing in support of kt ttlr,. ' that p„ . . - n i . -,ttly L . position. Certain tll l O 1 1 , 1 1 `1“:44 iditi ;yen to them ; 41 1 4 4i 11 , b retl 4 hy rarliametit v de -41 subjects, and the clues . . lion de&flad., T. Nasho slight r e coaaantaidaaia the ainst jou before the House, that.thenio“ able gala &anguished per sons of all partit!'o; , o suppoctad the Catholic Claims. It bad been ehly said, that on their emancipation depended the question whether the union between Great Blitain and 'lreland should prove a benefit or an injury to the former ; and whether tt‘ loyal and - generous people should henceforth ,be rendered a bulwark for the Empire. With regard to the question of domestic nomina tion, the Catholics of Ireland had always been de sirous to adopf some mode of election which might be unobjectionable to the Government, and ' at the same time be consistent with their own re- ligions Opinions. In his opinion, what had been proposed to be &Ate with this view, ought to be regarded as perfectly satisfactory. As to the Ca tholic Ciergy, he agreed to what had been so elo. erently and justly said in their praise by the Noble Earl. Ireland WAS much indebted to them for thearanquillity it enjoyed, and they were Ml wearied, in the performance of their religious duriesa ever really to administer consolation to their flocks by night or by day, they encoittitered the greatest difficulties. Of these pions andinde , fatigable men it might be justly said, that " With frames of adamant, and stints of-6:e, f‘ No danger daunt them, and no labour9 tire." Religious liberty lormed one of the most, impor tant principles of the British Constitution ; and the exclusion of the Catholics could not be main tained on any just ground. On this great wi thin, the writings-ot-Air. Locke, one of the greatest reasoner, any country ever produced, had induced him to change his early sentiments, It eras AS impolitic ms it was uncharitable to tos ter a spirit of jealousy with respect to the reli gious opinions of others. A very eloquent speech, he understood, bad been delivered .in another place, on the supposed danger to be apprehended' from farther concessions to tire Roman Catholics, but the opinion said to have been given was not that of a statesman. Those who talked of danger, front Popery in these Oates Would cry out tire'in the nriat• o'f a deluge. The Roman Catholics of Ireland had ma nifested,. amidst el eat suffer ings, a p a tience and forbearance that would have dime honour to the primitive Christians. They had en dured a degree of oppresiou which might even have justified resistance es <1 mean. o f ei c aping from Servile degradation. After all they had suf fered, it appeared to him that there was very Ft tle Christian charity or moderation in the re proaches which were: now heaped upon them by their a dversaries. The Bishop of Ossoev foll Owed : he entertain erg very' different views of the subject from 'the Ve nerable Prelate who hint just spoken. lie depre cited part of the doctrine held by the Rev. Pre , late, which he regarded as little short it that part of the people of Ireland, that if Parlia ment did not condor in their Petitions. they would he a lmost justified rrsistAnce. Against such doctrine he must protest, and pleased to non ' t Fast it with what had fallen from a Noble Earl, a ho had recently ail:tressed a niist lu wilt:ins legal speech to the HOWit. It wets held by that Noble Earl, that it iv.wc the province of the Legislature to enact laws for the people in its wisdom and discretion ; and that it was the ditty of the 'sub ject to aibey 'the lane , ao enacted. Recurring to the subject regelatly bin ore the House, his Lordship observed, be could riot regard what was called " domestic nomination, as "a new or ailegirate security--it was one. at any rine , of which they were long in possession. In what be should take the liberty to 'differ, be should refer to no authority or language, save that of. Ca tholics themselves, though it was almost totally im possible to compete with those who changed their Opinioits with every chaege,of the times.—He felt it necessary to read to their Lordships extracts from books written by the Catholics themselves, In order to shew that they were as unstable us the sands of the deert, and that what they said to day they would unsay to-morrow. He accordingly proceeded to read extracts from various resolu tions come to by the Catholics at different periods, and thence contended that 'they could never give up a foreign jurisdiction while they remained lto. man Catholics, but as it served their physical pur poses, they bad frequently ceased to be Roman Catholics to become Irish Catholics. He described their conduct in 1814, and from the course which they thought proper to pursue with respect to the regulations contained in the Bill then brought into Parliament, appealed to the House it it were pos sible to treat with men, so little to he. depended upon. When the rescript of Signor Qearentotti was received, and when they were told by him that they ought to receive rite measure then in agitatiOn with gratitude, he she led they had come to resolutions, in direct opposition to the reseript, and to the advice transmitted front Rome; and thus at mice ceased to be Roman Catholics.- :He next relyl an extract from a pamphlet written by a Reverend' and Venerable Character, whO had for sortie years filled it high office in the country with great credit. This pamphlet, published in 1814, ahewed, that according to the tenets of the Ito rttan Catholics, all: oaths taken by them. which were considered to he Irejudicial to the Church, were held to be null an void. He added his mite of approbation to that which the work referred to had previously called forth, and concurred iu the view which its author took of that part of the question. He censured the remit restoration of the JesuitS, acid react part of his Majesty's' first Speech from the Throne, to shew how strong . the pledge Which had been given at' the commence wits, that the Coristitn ment of the present reign tion should be preserved in Church and State. He was most anxious tet keep that Conatitution stn- impaired, rend should therefore feel it to he his duty to n vote against the motio n. The ishop of NortiVicit explained. The Earl of HaattoWnY considered the chain which bound men to the Government under which they lived to consist of an infinite variety,of links. The religion' of the State was one of these, and lie could not think the chain that bound him whn was not of the established religion quite so atroug, as that which be bore, who belonged:to the national church. lint,the question on which a politician bad to decide was, whether the chain in which this link wasavanting.appeared to be stigieientlYstrone for all practical Purposes, Ile asserted the ttlatire of this to be proven with respect to the • ' # Clatttnllca, ltv expetience rat d hist - ore: It‘ras ou all hank that it was ve r y ,lesirable to conciliate the Catholics, if this could be Anne. If then this were s 4 desirable, surely the attempt ought to he made by going into tire Committee. Tt Irad been argued by a Reverend Prelate, that if the Catholics were admitted into Nita meat,. and into the Army and Navy, the, two Houses of Parliameitt, the Army and the Navy would': inimediately. become CatholiC. Was it rational .to expect this"?- In England it ivas im possible, but vier) in Ireland there was,no.'reason to fear the Protestant interest would be in danger. He could not admit the:proptiety of throe dis tinctions made in the army, which would allow i'Catholic to command one regiment, but.which denied him the command of two. When a man had devoted 'the best part of his life to a particular profession; had shed his blood, and was covered with wounds in 'our service, he was of opinion that sufficient p. I et.ges were ob tained for his fidelity, and no danger trim such persons could rationally be . apnrebetided,'Save that which might grow out of the hard return that r tinder the present system fm meritorious services., system be held to he unjust, and was satis fied, trim the progress the question had . aireatkr made, and was still making, that it could not long continue. Jr the British Parliament would lay down the -conditions on which they .would — admit the Roman Catholics to a parti cipation in the privileges enjoyed by other snb ject%, they (the Catholics) wol.ld do one of-two tlitngs p , --therwould accept the 'offer thus made; or they would say they could not avail themselves of it, and in' either case, Parliament would have done its duty. All thtit could tie done to relieve the Catholics ought to be done. Thing's could not remain as they were, and those who enter. t;linell this opinion must, he should think"; concur with him in the propriety of going into, a . Coln-, mittee would. bind them down to no speci fic measure), in order to ascertain *tv'hat could -be done to conciliate Ott vititioners. The Earl: of Lorettroot, Was pi opinion, when.a motion like the ~present was submitted to the H o us e , that. they bad a right to look at the object kept in view by those 'Who brought the guess ion forward, Which, in. the present instance, was known tobe boundtll by Ito partial measure of redress, but .which went to admit the Roman Ca " tholics to equal ptivilege:s with . ' the Protestants. He bail a right to assume this, when it was re membered that the Bill bron , 4 lt int:q th e H ouse I ra 1814 was thrown out by the friends of the 'Ca tholics., because the omisSient iii the clause ena- Wing them to sit in Parliatnent was moved. and carried in the Committee on The hiemois of Catholic .Emancipation, instead of at, tempting to make' what they could of it by modi fying the regulations now in force with'respect to Catholics in the Aptly and Navy, gave up the Bill altogether, .tletermined to have all or nothing. This remembered, Ime had a right to assume a 'si milar feeling nreni eftisted, and to act accoroinly,. Au alteration in the-present mode ot nominatink the iiishups would afford na security for which he would give 'any thing. It was not the manner of their, nominationi 'but 'the influence under - which• they afterwards waled to,.which he most objected., Theitestion w si;uply this—Was Parliament disposed to grant the concession claimed ? If they were, it Might not to be made in an ungracionS manlier, but ought to be accorded unencumbered with useless restriction. The principles of Protes,t antistn Pervaded every part of Our present system. The religion of the State connected itself with the proceedings of the two' Houses of Parliament, and the Judges, on their Circuits by law, or, at least by long established custom, which he said, to have ilie•effect of !me, could not open their commissions. till they had been to the, Parish church to attend Diving, worihip, In every part of the system this connection between the Csta blished Government and the Established ''Cimnreh, has been recognized and acted. upon. Time goes.. tiara now befri're them 'was therefore, whether or nut the whole system of the emintry should be citahg.!(l . . The - propositions brO.ight before the Mouse went to place the Protestant and Catholic Churches on the same tooting (the endowment ex cepted), and the moment Oils was effected, the Par. liausent 'WOidd cease to be . a' Protestant Parlia ment.- He did not , mean to say there would not be a majority ot Protestant Members in both. Houses, but they would no longer have a might CO' call what by' law they ought' to be, aProtest ant PailiaMent.. A twinge must take ..pl ace in our w hole eyfitem, and was this a step which, their Lordships were not prepared to take ? The effect of the measure, if Carried', instead of pro ilmicing that minion and harmony which its advocates contemplated,' would, he was satisfied,' he quite of an opposite character. It was said things could, .not remain ai they were, hilt he wooll ask the ad VoCates cif Emaactpatibliiftheycould remain at that point to_whichthey wished.to carry them? He con. : ten d e d rid ? , Was not to be expected from the princi plmis of the itoman Catholics, Which it was known ' %Verb opposed to toleration The result of the best' :attention he could give this subject, was a convic tion, tb a tac preserve all that was valuable in the Constithtion, the connection between Church and State tittistbe upheld, To . tnake'elf religions equal would leave .the effect of ormettling t h e mimils of 'nen, and would be pregnant, wi:h dan ger. He could not consent to the present motion. Many Specific - Measure wire broiight forward, lie would give it his best consideration y but feeling as he did that the preservation of the Constitution depended upon,theGovernment remaining essen. Bally Proteit'ant, faVriur propol,ition which did not afford ample tecuritics for the maintenance of the. Established -Church. ne-Earl cif DARNLAY was not disposed to deny that the conduct of some individuals among the Catholics had been improper ; but this he Con tended ought•not to operate against the measure recommended to the adoption of Parliament, with a view to cOnciliate the Catholics generally. He thought it desirable that a lasi' sbould pass to ad mit the Catholics to equal - Privllegei'with the Pro testants, on their 'taking such oaths to support the existing establishments, ai they.could consei. entionsly take. Besides Catholic Emancipation, many other Changes were raiiiiredto make-iroand enj , iy all the advantages which naturally belonged to her. r% different system of.goverfiment,, tihct r ter adtainistrittiou 'of lath, end an extension of the !jeorefiti of erftwation among the tower ordersovere desfralilv, but the measure now under conThierkif: tibn was a sine qua non. Without it Ireland would never be tranquil, • • Lord GRENvti.tu remarked', that in all men. sures bf legislation inconveniences and d mgerg must be,halanced, and selihnn, if ever, could one be adopted- froli Which evil +night not be extract• ed, If, theret'ure- some 'evil consequences should be anticipated from the concessions now called for iir favour'of the Catholics, it did:not follow that it was preferable to remain where they were. It was from his anxiety to preserve onimptateri tfie stitution in Chord) and State that he wished the Subject now brought under their consideration to . andergo the tidiest inquiry. Nothing could tend more to strengthen our present establishinent than union and harmony in Ireland ; nothing conhl endinger it more than the discord and hostility which resulted from the system now acted upon. thou4ht danger was not likely to arise Innis admitting CathtiPCS to seats iil Parliament, and to situations at the Bar, and in tile Army and Navy, Which were not at present open to them. The Noble Earl (the Earl of Liverpool) hid argued, that if the present grievance. 'were removed., one still greater would remain behind ; but if the question was to aggravate or soothe discontent, he thought nothing could be risked 'by departing from the present He did not know that any man could be presumptuous enough to answer the question that had been'put as to the possibility of rennaining at that point to ivhich it WiiS now proposedto go, but he saw no danger in quitting that where•t bey now were. here were few greater natnesnin his. tory titan that of King William the Third : Ga was the first Statesman who prott • ssed and who acted on the principle of : toleration. This Was in fact the principle of the Revolution, but it had been unhappily departed n front with re.] sect to Ireland, and a 'code of penal laws adopted, the Most persecuting' and bigotted that had ever disgraced any Country. tVhat %VHS now attempted wits in facrouly'un aort to retnrn tO the true spirit of thetonstitminn. Fie inocecdedi to chew the importance of meeting the wishes of the Catholics, and maintained the measure on. der discussion might to be• conceded, first, he. Cause it was their duty; secondly, became it was. their interest - ; and thirdly, and above all, because it was now called for by the public in language no ipnger to be resisted. Earl BATHORST took 2 general view of the various Opinions entertained. by the friends to Catholic Emancipation, lie objected to go into tt Chininittee ivithouttiome sreeific plan before them ; as if they Came'out of it without doing any , thing to meet the wishes of 'the. Petitioners, dis ,appointinent would be the consequence, and iu ie Ctirnmittee, father• than do this,•they might be indneed to agree to that, which, on better eon. Sideratihn, they would think impolitiC. When it was slinWn that the Established Church would be safe Catholic elaiMs . were'conceded, he. inighV,bedisposed tel entertain the•measure. lila Noble Friend had said things could-not stand asi al l ey were.' He r would answer this by saying, things had stood 'where they were for some time, and he wiml,l not consent to,.quit. the grost•rd 'bn hvbich he had rested so tOng, to prqs . throqlvhogs and' morasses, till some spot could be pointed 65nt to him, where he could stand as' well. if they de.. parted • froth where `they were at ?resent, .they 'plight not be able to stop till they ha i l gone on from measure to measure, and made the situatinn 'of the Protestant subject worse than that of the Roman Catholic; and while this was done, and the Protestant ascendancy thus sacrificed, he saw no:prospect of,satisfyiug the Catholics of ire. land. With this,feeling tie would not consent to . gO into is Committee in order to seek for Some plan which it might be well to adopt, mee t « sure recommended could not be yentrired without making a fundamental eliaoge in our system, and for such a change' he was not prepar. ed. He was: anxious to preserves the Constitution, and to keep the Church on the rock which it had been placed upon by the Reformation, and front which he :trusted in God it would never be dis. , , Earl GilltY had heard with pain what had been said by a Reverend Prelate, that though the Pro. testant religion might safety he .tolerated in a Ca tholic country, it was not so with the Catholic. religion in a Protestant country, He had till now thought the Protestant religion . had been the Mre tolerant. The, distinction Made reminded him of the language of the Duke of Guise to his assassin, which one of our Poets had put into the ,south of Tamerlatie---" Now mark the diiferetace 'twist my'' religion and thine. Thine bids thee take my life, mine teaches me to forgive the attempt." Ue could not admit that the Catholics enjoyed complete toleration while they were open to their fellow,sub. jects, Such exclusion to him appeared to be iiieonsii tent with the principles of tole, ation liie bed never placed this question on the untenable ground of right, but he was of opinion, it' some danger cook'. not be proved likely to result from admitting Ca tholics into all the Offices of the State, the exclo• sian was unjust, and ought - not to exist. No such danger, had been proved to his satisfac tion. The Noble Earl opposite. (the Earl of Li verpool), had indeed said, if the measure were adopted—if : Catholics were admitted into Par liament, the Parliament could no longer be calied exclusively_ Protestant,- and therefioe he consi dered it to: be fraught with danger ; but this to him : (Earl Grey) appeared, to be danger the most futile and imaginary 'heeled ever been urged. against the claims °Ft he Catholics. it was no argtlinent against the proposed concessions to say That the Catholics had other bordens. to bear which they could not be freed from, such as that utpayingf tithes to the established Church. But theseT olber , burdens formed it very strong argit4 ureic. against: those which could be taken off . . Catholies Were How kept down and proscribed. They weft precluded front rising in the Army or at the Bar. ,The. policy of the present systetn of exclusion Was this, that the .Cotholics were encou• raged to acquire:skill in eloquence and other popular arts, and these they were almost compelled to use *gains! the' state iu which therweredi tin ,,Hri,,d ant i to theciithbli6s Of 1.4 . 1g14,)d, that f uost reqwetaille and exemplary body ot'lntl, though the itill measure-of justice bad not been given tliem, yet Was their sttuation izt .Itervi requi of 'III" a Ina I L_ itt Cu One wh 4)4 f II , tt IrCti b y o f I°l member /I°lll in "e civil ~ of °la ugh not al 1° di lliatif I) . 4 " 01 qedge t h e a r if the or :not a for e i t o f 1! but norm 141 that ,1 hrety .. te 1 1 1 tt if ni it 441, wh 61li o , 41 1 1 10 tit I g !iv hu e , lr dons acsr i n '' % ; obttg r ,, to oppl y a P t ?we r 4,1;1,11 2 e tell 6 ) 4 t "if to 41.coosist ti t• 41ipt,!i 'e for t) , al w atiti per, d t)1 Tia 4fit —1 .! " 3 ti ,r 4,Lcess•H y 3 t, I Pn , ed t to 11 Ito ()I'M 111 c 0 0 LI 11 i'mtigf) (91110 14, t, n 1 111 J , tri act b e t l ift 1)4114 1 C, se .ettie I • e , t ier sot est t the CI ttlikion I tltr , ill ke h at Ilie .ie 'vertin I • II„ aVo np ti Who% b,, by t it ati Pet t tl 11 41 ('4tl uiv cif e ; he a ' ev ent t' gf l i t i rt ,,ibegj i e l ieu, ofci ''tt r oc to be trttst, [ It