The Sun. — London, England, 1817-04-10 00:00:00

~. ~ .e. ~•;. of the relevancy. After a proof, tlie Jot Y would Love to indg,e of ;be law and of the fact. The Lora JUST :C1; CLERK. entirely concurred with ttit , othev Judges in holding the lihel to ( be relevant. The visual interlocutor of relevaney.wis then pronounced, and the Jury chosen, Andrew Finnic. merchant in Kilmarnock . , knows the Dzati•Patk, within about half a Mile of *tlietar reinembers a Public Meeting there on the 7th of Decetiiber, of about 4000 "people, tnany them of the lower orders. l'hat_the first Speech was made by : McLaren, principally on the' est nnor'de of — petiti;riing for 'Parliamentary. Reforin., That he doeS.not particularly remember the Speech W but only'one.pasSage near the end :it •wifs " e will lay onr.petitions at the foot.of,digahrone , where sits our tingust Prince; whose.Atuteyous ear will heir the , :ric"s of his people,whieh bottn'd to do by! the . CtinsaditiOn: 6.f: the ens . tnit y, should be..be sd,infatuated,ds to turn ii , .(leof ear to. 'the cries of his people, to,belL ivith allegiance." mbre. That .tre: has seen a pamphlet xiviug an 'AccOunt of the.me.eging, but , did. not not ice the above passage in tba,t•Ftatemeut. Thinks the wo'reli' " and W 6 'are thereby , bound to give him our allegiance'' are. antimci. The worts "'he' hus forfeited their allegiance" were never. ruetri tioued----ouly the words '' to hell with . ..their al le.Jance," That lit Avns appointed cme of the committee in preparing (lie atatement, but never acted. Baird was also one of the committee.--.- Was in erawford's when the statement was print ing, and got about five dozen copies, four dozen of. which he gave to Bait d, who said lie had got quit of all his, rind Baird was surprised the wit- Less had not, That lie had eleven copies over.— That the p4onplilet ti as sold at each, arid he and Kiik'd went together to Crawford's, while die fituriphlet was prin+ , On his living Cro23s.ocAlliined .by Mr. JEVVartY for RAH, he said ',laird disapproved of the pas sage of M.Laren's speech relativc. tic, l illeg:iance, The f:t'aternent was primed for the pt rpOse of de• fraying the exnenee of the ineetin*,„ T,vo per- tons were against printing at all, vib i ;Eoliustone awl 'McLaren. Baiid was agaitie prin ting all the W o rds, par:it:elm iy that passage about alleLjauce,. but the Committee. did not, adopt his suggestion . Before,the public tne,:ting 'hero was a riot 41)1.itit meal; . LtiapAriVoc ti5... 7 --Did McLaren state any thing to the COtuniittee relAiive to the pantmc 14 1 utied ti) M‘.l.4.iren'said, if the Conituitteiltought the pastuye ought to he 1... ft out, let. it ! bt. sQ, : Baird Skid the e'ipres , ioo wa velyindecent.;;, ; „:, Mr. Citta;vr aNked', if the words aggromlisement and vile purposes in the printed b jives lies .werc recollected - by the witness? They were not,— . M' Laren was backward in opening the mertiog. B.PLaren repeatedly said atu r t the words he used as to allegivrce were a quotation from .Shaks- peare. Merrie, Wright, Kilmarnock, said he . was At the meeting on the 7th December, and re members ?4 Laren's Spree'', • which ended with to' witlr allegiance,'!. or for such allegi rime, it he (the Pelmet: Regent) turned a (leaf ear in he voice of the people. Said, that the put'. vise .of the meeting was to petition the Sore leign; that M'Leirett's speech excited no commo , = t tinning the people, earl" .She tendency of it was la address the Prince, and lie spoke of him (the. Prince) in loyal terms, and becoming a good sithj-ct. Hugh Craseford, printer.; il ma rn ock , prinfed the pamphlet. Does'isof.know who revised the pi natl. That _laird was - Once in his shop about it, and that ile.got from tone to six dozen•copies of it. That be has never re . ccired payrivot for. he p i trnphlet,,,of which thet e. were •ahonf 400 . riot. iii ; hut lie looks to 13 siicl, Finniei and Andrews; for pigment. . • • Thomas Murray, journeyman with qtr. raw ford, being sliow it a pamphlet, said . it -was printed by him for Crawford. That, the first part of the copy .came from Mr.. Crawford and part from David litinoniy, Andrew.' hat Andrews andjiiiird cause to the Office to correct. the" copy., -paird was there two or three tiolOs, and proposed.an alteration one Of .those times, Wai' not !m ole.. The ,inannseript desasoyed. That there , was a part Of the mantiscriPewtirch he could not. make ..out, atul thet clove put ,tifi e l,,ldank. (Being shown a paniphlet, he poitialli; out the blank before the wordHallegiance . .)' . :T'he proofs were sent to Mr. Allill*WS, hut never Baird. James Johnstone, noislio agent,. Kilmarnock, said lie recollects the meeting near Kit+►rriritn k, • 'Mid that there was a Committee held previOus to the niMing - , at which !several resolutions were hared and read at 'the meeting: That the wit ness and pannels were Members of the Conit6ittee, and the evening after the meeting the Committee met amr as reed to print the llesolndons a nd speeches; - saw no manuscript of the speeches, , ' except his own.. That he never read the pamphlet, •aad did - not revise his own speech. • • Mr. Andrews' did. so,- That M‘Lareo complained to hint that the AV4Mlltc to hell with.alleginoce," wrts not its the Inanascript. And 111" complained of any thing - being pot in between the: words " to, and,alle glance "- being a quotation trent as play, it Wll wit in the copy,•,the original hieing, "to hell allegiance. '' I . ll.'Laren said it was neither riche he pamphlet nor its the indictment, which M'liar,enstietved him the day be ; recei,V,ed it, - Cross -,, exsinine,4 by NI% JaVirtiai.-- 1 -Llas heard Paird . say it was a pity thefirbose words burl be .11 itsed or-printed, Wit neat teti-4 , tigaitssi print at ail, as' the speeches, being hastily delivered, no!; like his owns bear the scrutiny of the • rye.. The Motive for printing held o u t wax. to tici'lq the expellee of . the meeting: Witness been shown a MS. admits it to have been tla of his 'Own speech, prepared before the *KnoWs the rates of ueaverS' wages at Elknartiock ; the average is ss. 64. at present ; 1 0 ' 1 v , 'in •Is. to 46,.• 6d; which required vrort.:ng i S . to 16 hours per Ll.ryOltit title of work svould have produced 143. foraerfti: • 'rhere was wear distress anion.! the'svorkinglieople. Never 'knew or hcard iii :',llLar'en entertilning disloyal sedit teutions. Understands hi- to be a nit, ii tit 'oiiittlasle and itisiustrious . lia. , I'll,. Knows M'Lastli was its the rifle corps in liilo,arilock. The meeting Kos conducted its an orderly manntr, an there %vas no diftleoltv itt sp conducting it. The Comnittee which 'v appointed to pre pare the mition Were Bird,,APll , arett, and others. They said nothing ahout who- had.ccrin posed the petttion, nor did they, to the best of . witlips":a rf!collee6on, say'any thing to induce hint to s•uppoier . they had got it from any other quarter. "ffirgli — Willbit, - weaver, vt Kiltnarnock, bad bought a printed account of this meeting, in Baird's, for•%vhich he paid' v. The MeptiOg wets quiet and orderly ; he had known M' Laren for six years-rhe Wa3 ti -loyal and peaceable moo r ,- and never• heard that lie beldnged to any political meetings, except the Committee for Reform that he served in the rise corps in the Kilmarnock local militia, and generally in moment took part with the Goverimtent. James Samson, weaver, Kilmarnock, Said' he has seen the pamphlet iu question, which contains a speech , of his at the ❑teeting of the 7th of De ,cember, which was ,pretty correct. That he got the speech front Mr. Baird, and. the read it at the meeting; but he trbilerstimd it wa.i. a 1111- Burt that composed the speech which he had read, and thinks it was in his hand •writing. The reason why Mr, atitt requested hint to read the speech was, he.conld not attend himself. • The declaratiims of the pannels were then read, which eloSed the evidence for the Cro%vn. FOIL THE PANNELS. James Samson, weaver, Kihrtarnock (a former witness,) did not hear M`Lareu's speech' well,-,and' did not pay much attention to it, .t.ts he had 'a speech to read himself. That M' Laren was re. Marked as one of the most to:, al subjects in the place where he. dwelt. That at a Committee Meeting he heard a paper read, which pttrported to be M"Laren's speech, but does not think the words " Should he be so infatuated as to turn to deaf ear to their just petition, he has forfeited their allegiance ; yes, my fellow-townsmen, to hell with allegiance'' were right. Said these were some pencil marks on the copy of • APLaren'S, bpecel!, hut did not know who made them.---- ThioksMr. Baird made- the marks, and his reason for doing so, was, that it was not complete ac cordiog to the way it was delivered. Joint AndreW, E. Chief. Magistrate of Kil nuirnoek, said, recollects of a Meeting in Decent. her last. Mr: 'F. Baird waited on hi.in some days before, to ask if he objected to it, as it Would not be belt, ►vitliont his pertnpision.---- I Fhat be objected to the Meeting, but did not think he could hinticr it. 'Dim he heard.the Meeting was well attended. Mt. 'taint has al irays.been of a.gdotl . characier, in a respectahle"way trs a merchant, and was formerly an officer, in the Volunteers; Mr. W. Andrews, writer, Kilmarnock, said, he n'tni a Member of the Committee ; bOth- Mr. Baird and, witness objected to thelast pert of M' Laren's Speech, but the Committee out ,voted. them, and the wiirds, were kept. - Mr:-.Baird also objected to Kennedy:s,Speech, and part of Burt's. Mr. Baird also•for quiet measures, and that every thing should be done in an orderly way. • The Rev. James K WC: wood apoke to Baird's character—thiliks him incapable of exciting dk turoance noront.i, the people. • Mr. John Wyilie, Surveyor of Taxes, and Mr. John Brown, Writer, Kilmarnock, also spoke to chlracter ; Alley,described Baird as a constitutional advocate for : reform in Parliament, and not violent in patty The Loan AnvocaTa then addressed the Jary. The prisoners were charged with sedition. M`La ren was accusers of having uttered, before a ruul •titude of people of the lower orders, a speech ol an inflammatory nature. Baird was accused ol having published and circulated a statement ol the proceedings at the meeting, and the speeches. there delivered, which• were - in the same seditious language. Now sue, vidence'wes unqueStionable, that the speech libelled was tittered by M‘La • ren, and tints the statement was, circulated by Baird, who appeared ,to have been the chief person con. cerned in causing the printing of it. : His:Lordship that recapitulated the evidence, and proceefled:,--, The facts being proved, let the import of them he considered. After what the Court had already expressed, little Peed be said un this subject . — Sedition was at crime by the ConiMon of Scot land, and included Whatever tended to disturb the Government of the 'country. Ii was doubt legal to arraign the conduct of 111iuisters, but whatever vilffies the Constitution or the Parliament seditious.is Were, any one at presen t tt go about With A White cockade, as an adherent of the Pre tender, he would he:viekved as a madman ; but it would have been otherwise Pr 17-1;i. In the cases, in 1793, it was settled, that seditiMt 'Was is crime at common laW, and liable to an ttrbi trary punishment. Let the terms of the speech which M`Laren delivered be considered.' They had alritflyi by the unanimOtts opinion of ,tbe %bulges, been held to he libellous. It Was . not Ateaut to under.rate the dis'iresses of the country, b ut i t was a mast deplOrahle eirettOfitance, Thar those distresses; great as they were, should be made the itts't rument of disturhing the public. tran quilli,S.. What could be meant by the expres sions its, the speech., except to excite to,resktance that oliOithy which was spoken of in such Op. I)l.6lu:buts lauguage: 'The resolutions made •part of M'Lateit's speech. These, on page »fith of the pamphlet, contained - a proposal, that the Prince should order Parliament; a Manner which be had no fight to do; and, if he refused, the .people were to 'throw off their - allegiance. What was this brut sedition As to the publication, _it was ob vious that the - Sante observations applied to it which applied to the speech, as that speech was contained in it. The word " hell" Was indeed trot.ptinted, imt there was a blailk for. it ; and it -had, been : proved. that such pas the word meant to he supplied. The pamphlet iilluded to the trans actions of 1793, and obviously tended tst set mmp the Conduct . of the of .those limes as worthy - of imitation. It stated next, that the House of Ciimmous %tete not the representatives of the people. It'stated, that there ought to. be univertial tatFrage' and annual, Parliaments, anti that, if these could not be obtained, the people ought to throw oft' their.allegiatice: What Was thii but to propose to orertorn the present Con'. StitiniOn, which did nocadmit - of Such u mode of representation t No Other person than such as held immediately from the Crown ever had a eigAit : , Jo vote to Parliament. Utiivers4l suf frage bad „tiever been attempted in any country, exec p t -:a sseighbouring tine, where the deplor able raseitrlvere in the•recollection of us ell.— There wore'eXpressiens in the publicatioO which glWticet . at - even overthrawing the Church—And 'there.sva's an expectation held out, that - the army inighti\be induced to aid the views of the people. against the Government. Fysche Palmer was found guilty of sedition, for expressions not. so strong as those 'of which the . petitioners have been accused. He observed; that it was not the question hoW often sedition had ibeen committed with impunity. It was no rule to a court of law, that the House. of Commons liad passed over 'seditious expressions. As 'to the inten tion of the prisoners, no other conclusion could be drawn, in consistency with, what they have actually done, than to hold that they had in view . to excite insurrection. • Their - conduct must be taken in conjunction with whit.was going on _all ever the country. Seditious and crit»inal publics tioos were in circulation every where. As to their character, let them have the hill benefit of it.— Theeasewas now• left with the Jury; It was the indispensable duty of the public prosecutor to lay it before a Jury. It was necessary to attempt to check the audacious measures which had been re sorted to. ' • Mr..CLERK addressed the Jury on the part of it,i(L a reu. It was of delivering the Speech only that he teas accused. Now, if the object of this Speech was to procure consent to petition to Parliament, however warmly and strongly expres sed, it was legal according to, the Bill of:Rights. The right to complain was unquestionable; this might be done in any language. Ile had a right to state what lie considered' to be a grievance, although it might be impossible to grant what he demanded. There could be .no limits to the 'right, of petitioning, otherwise the , right itself was at an end, --,;,- It was not possible to exptess such- grievances: as were meant to be petitioned against, - withoat.in some degree re flecting on the GovernMent, bet that the aggrieved had a right to do. , How could alleged griev ances be petitioned against Without being describ cii I They might be actpal grievances or not ; 'but whether they were so or not, they might be peti tioned against, or. how teas the general right to be made effectual., Very strong language may be used in petitions; •If so, the same language may he 'used -by anticipation, in consider big what.are to be the subjects of petitions. : This case had no resemblance to that of Pal Mer, or to the, cases of Gerald and the others in 1793 and-1794. In those the object was. not to petis tion Parliament, Mr. Clerk concluded by Ker., minding the Jury to kecti in view M.Laren's goOk, Character, and read some certificates of charactirY as the letters of exculpation bad been mis-gent. Mr. : JEFFERY, for Baird, next addressed the Jury, and contended that the prisoner - WAS a re spectable man, who bad been entrusted with nil- , litary 'commands,' and was well -affected to Go vernment. The essence of the crime of Ateditims is, that there was a felonious ittterition :The intention, therefore, 'Must be cautiously attendell to. Direct and positive evidence of intention is not to be -expected, but the foes and..cie. , cunistances Must at lea s t support the..ittps position if made, that the intentton- had: lieen wicked and felooiouso . ,Here there 4...t0pm for. that supposition. • Of many facts the felonious in tention is evident from the facts themselies, as in the casts of murder and'forgery. - Sediti-no:tt . any act committed with the intenliori—of producing, discontent or disturbance in the iseople,-- It is not. necessary to show that` distitykosee bar actually-I happened, but then the : acts mitst.,have the'n,teb.;;_' dent), obviously, and without any othersupposable, object.' It is- not then enough- that the - measures of Government are arraigned. DiSientimi is riot in.itselt a tremendous thiog,„There iia disseotioti r . . ; known in this country; and in, mi.:v4w siijicli.: is the physic of our constitution.“ , el;laite , are, oo'ftioubt, supposable excesses ; such Me .be com mitted,,even in deliberating, for petitioning-Pa4:l lianient. Suppose a petition to Parliametitto abolish the : Clitisti . i4n . teligion---.to_ciepose the , King—fur common interest in wives and such like—or were the object of - the petition to..be pros posed to be carried into effoct by foree—this Would be criminal. .-Annual. Parliaments would indeed he hazardous—universal suffrage Would be impracti cable ; it is not' illegal toThink otherwise, ancictis petition for them. It was certainly legal tuse,p, pose, and to express, that the country is not fairly represeuted, if not, no petition is lawful., re has been said, that the words used adoilt`of no de fence. ' It would be most unjust to take particular wcirds in the speech or statenient,;without attend ing to the others. Some of the exprctsions are very improper, titit they are not seditious, .It is not enough,that exoressions are blameable,„ they may still not he seditious'. Let the tiornbat in. po litics : t? e by speeches of au oppositeTtendeocy, nisi by trampling . upon the necks of We'formers. I. words in the•petitions do not imply resistance. --=- 'I he allegiance - to: - be renounced: applies to the .whole people, not to the petiti-oners, and the sup position made is consistent tvitlethe ConStitotiOn ; but that is a subject which tight to be treated as a mystery... , • . * After-several remarks on the general nature of SeditiOni'the Learqed Gentle:nail said, itWas not the spirit of thi s countr y to b e eas ily alarmed at intemperate expressions against the tiovernmeot ; witness the tottnberless publications in England', by Cohbett, &c. containing expressions nigh stronger titan those in this: obscure paiiiiiiilVe Yet this is the fi rs t t r i a l- o f . th e p resent -ibeirvol i will he no honour to see an example of vin*tiv justice. .ouch. Governments only as a re d o ubtfi of their - own popularity are vindictive. 'The' ; e4es of the country are upon this . first trial ; . it will 'be. pp glory to this Jury to lend themselves• to abet the over-zeal of the.Qflicers . of. the - Crriwn. This is a case, above all others, .fitted tor a'Jitry, in which the least possible assistance Is to be ex pected from the cause. Above all,--is a- Jury trial precious, where the political, right's or. the individual are implicated - . The Loan Ji.IT;C s Cilattki snmm - etl up* the er dence. Setlition was charged.:7tribrOttllltitikili Oft the prisoners were different. -His Lordship, tinntlid, home's definition of sedition, and went over the evidence,, front which he drew the cOneluSion that the facts had been distinctly pilule out. Inc C be o e u n rt sedition. .a o l n re .. a.ll found the elisr.gi ierev"ti all 119 W that the facts had been proved, bislioribliiP had no h es itation in concluding that 'there hitt t t ea!Lertriorenotts class ; still, bolsterer, there tr, al . l 'S 13 ° b i to u t t i . lttelilieesictordribyt j''s°ercentrew)fj.lllll,gtteittaiot.titilii:eg „„e!stion, and unless the intention was viol:nal, tnelS4 was not' s made out. If the words were anllo-tiouss the milder constructiod ought t° , b , e „ . adopted. But when the words were clear alai , : janilltit'‘odti!iel.bral.oFocn)onfensss.tect.tilmtietetti°batnliei;ng ought to be (Ago. It Os proper to take the whole of the publicatiodta. gether, - In . the whole speech of IVl‘listeer toile Of it was Inch at admitted of *only one es : clusi°ns vit.-:iltat it was inflastaanny, rig alone. The reference .to the. proceetliap 2 , 1 . 1 . 1793 s is also strongly indicative el sr ei o i tils a e r d liainent are hest judges -of wbat is °r it 1 : ' e I l b d ' et es e a l r i e l st i i ia l v i ci i n is ca s s e t i n i . :t e r n . e xie r sil e ir : t el l 'il l i si c Y e ti : : t b i l' i , sel e til l: ll : :l ; :cl . re'i l le ; l : i: j alittl e e.t , c . , , dni c ift • lif t nee : l f i':ll ; ):)::ll:lii°;iiuc::::e;,llll.llll4l"l6 : : Cni°l'.; iTh a e c o:nrLosaiii'r'rlrscaPregat‘e.ite‘'i'oliiiiet‘.gi‘ :: :;1 1) : Mace ti t t l : ' o ' l le , i ir , l i n ! ; 11e1111 ( )(1):°'llsittl'''' , 1 : 1 ; 'l):eeltiriitetiliolcntiii'islE: language be used, the 0 6 ', a ', l o 3'. suffer the consequences. Ills Lardshlll l i j i ti , no wish to press the case ttpon t ie , ~, l a • more than" it deserved. It was then' poill!,-10: say whether there' had or bail not beets s c"'l ol i, excess. t e e l/ e b r itl li t g abi°aPoe occur it rin his II"' N, Jill pate . circumstances had taken place. 13,,r:resot. strong measures had again been tiecessaroli ijoi,, ell to ; but the jury were not . to be iti3'4'`, er e (0 circumstances of the times, "gild th e Y „ cs uol , t consider the ease i n itself. It olis ',rticfllet situation sl' tuedv enr(),ltli t i f directlse their priscLttitt•hsall:ltg:tlltt 1:Y1': 11‘11SliCe16,r1e5iiielufillIS:f:11 e g n : 1 1 : 1 1, e 91 1: r i e g l P t o r o iv their ale itc.iyij:lrtaye- t o e t r : if ottruni:lcti::cel)::""iiclgei'; itlit'el;iii" lust be taketillito view, itt indgilig ° I " , t oes' lions , As ble sioli"`? 11 t tl j ered it a "'might the balance even inrweile'inP`ltb,.eil:oer" !Wits reVative to the inteotioa of t be , b P e settl etti : . _Tile Court Met'again t his days ,ft , di ,, g ,'ll l t e t wl . - 'i. , itpl l) .6 , )ilibil l iel'ill'irt:erlii-nill'ileel.bei.tec_citirt:Yecrenzai:lll.ll:mnllt'l(°l:teerictslYtiticitell:lsinrn'e're'seciaja.ltit°lue:;tiYiirr'hin:llecgt)tt°'r.lisiel4satiit.3teYc‘°6eitie'hri4nc.tdlireillilleeicti Itic_lll)''lll'llelct.einos.t-;''lrsoatriatitt'n'llietrttt:l°llte°ccrt.tirtilt:(:)c-b::iteirlii'.. ~k da ll u dt i t i3 o n account of their i° r fuel. Maur oniw°6ll a voices - IL, . afi lltv ° d Odillp s !mei!' Lordships' delivered le i i e h ta ',` l °11." length, and sensenced the .,.. „ te ii" ! .cjaoaft- ,I,,re nmiitlir linprisournent, io• th e , „,,e Pc' e t yet„.s, ifilanidr:ls_eiltiu:rity toik,eeoti) t2loieoil);0111'01. a pena t) . in one of - 401. . ~t,iiitTeehtverliatarclieaol,),tnn_E,f‘4,..„Asean:dinraeLrd.a.D.K,yfey;iiiricif li ar : ti f 1 ° : 6 , : ,- , 1 t il u i n l r r i ; , i 1 1:1:: _ `I he unlawful oaths,. is I)otpOnefl ' ~ t ot erl °4 . iroirneeSdt:rday-abatit tWeiVe Clerk 0 .11: :: • .C°, Police il.i/ Ccro:aTirftf fi tielle;al,:tleseEtiTrtitllv.ibeilteAtis,.olTNot,nii.riCleiteare:rirlieciog./:‘int.tlS:cet'llitrierl'ii;i:ol.l.istat,leyi:.,loc,::lii:),eesselitrgidoleB'ocirlsl,ytoolloiliel:c.,orij'i:loll,'his,ifi: ..boau.tbsi(idit.asof ~Tse,li_aoilicteeic,l itnOgg.,estl;ite'sslcino: a , : li VI:::::: , : 11;ri l i.1 1 ,011 1 1a O . 1 i . sei) tl icay l g ee ' t : A rtue ; niei li ti a i led : a: e t apin:li'il.),:tca.K- ifn.lireaocoiciiiiiitpiii..:lll:ailliterc:liiii.guelsiellitikel:trit:ll,llll,':::::ritilfilsoc:i:ie:l;oo,.ribi°;gi it itan.rifd these Inert live' aL !Ig e , IVl ' l ' ° 44-itleton. and one Ille•ir (1111t,1)14Cgo,„j011,:riirf I for the t,'' net . ' of k • i . I. appointee. ~ ; a pof ot womb Was pre: vented filial VW 1 , c e. 4) ill' itert.mii of theilli;gistratrs, il:! of ilfg ..„ ipt horse " a verrituinerons assetnniii.6°o tiie i ti c Y l w to foot, who poured ",1 I,oootiooiliii ,morning in all directions. 4" ° ' a t ill Y: O'' c9ofined i ll 0 . ,s.: 11 ' '. 6 *-1 .' .sileY l'' to 10 ‘ .t IG. i. eW ~ . .„,,,is ~r , . nett they underwent ex3rninati"', ofiew• of' ~ t 'll' CO 0 gtstfate on Moitelayereninp ne.tolfcc,,,o't, !jolts to their removal bY th,e '/I:teriffenTStOi London, About two o'ciocKY'.‘creorlvvi W.' conveyedfrorn theOtliee to ille' olifolt,loo//' •.°ffie-e for -tbe•flonte Pe qrtinentf .1 !ZIP. pt,eit ti er we at, att. eN. a eui na t iOnPiie fere. Itifercyt.' the Under Secretary of Statet, 1"o Sir NAT/lA:WA, Conntcr, 6c,.,' iford,JP, pi!? - . At the same tinte,Siiniii'l ,P,t1,..,5). 10' rit ,l, ~ shire . John I,:ob.erts,• as Sew. !.,,and Y_,410_,.,, riotiumigl nil tton,,F.dward Cogroidonirt;l:i;:s •11 tilq ,' : % ; 1 1, 0 were brought-I°i° by 0 e 4 ' , 0 , ,4, Cl?Ci.ter, 00 00.3151 of illor''',,leoco,..,feew.ol liiin) Anil POes, tire ,:ing7o::;, of ("::,,•,0140. r sterile y vopoyed front tli.e o il o'- i l ' i, , , , ,. ,l r ef , ' i t p4o, ~Y INfr. Bv..crwirr, the tornla ) 1, e t hey I.` ii, 3ecretury of State's Office, %viler , . iyro!!s4 os NIV a SCCOWI 'C'X 0:n01100811. - 0 0 ; iff' „: 4 4, 'Air. Knight, a‘taallilfactarr,rdijoefiile.o rofj, front ritilichester to London 1 1, 0 1 1 ', P , A i Officers; was' conveyed Ina c ,c,L rot '010,01;,e, Dridewell., and lie also tindefoirviiiiet, it `ocli:ol.,, .sll:ltYricti:tcerirrt,rs'itt'ek:ol4:::::c3,u;tisite:tsptit'astlitriiiii‘nieciii.C.:;:::.:lirsc‘::iiii:ft:c:::::;:ef.'4lr''rtitl note! till near six o'clPel,' mo del! lapiii, bec All ~ the parties viel'e reo",fitficts, ~,if t°,rr, 'Places of con6iiement. „le o rao , cr e r i'P Lem*, and John Matt n"iirl Idrioll,r; t dined in custody. ` lll - ' V rOillrailiti -oerliiiti different ro . I ban Po ' Oak 01.11 '• WO, -an ( neOCCei oe. JO 1 each other. Tlie wii"le r -y .is secro.' f di , ducted with the sttiellit ;." f ulY ° the charges preferred oga" l ' 0 0 0.., e , transpire. tali ittii i,„ 4 ll l j 0 beirlg ( SerrAfge i'i %'. "Mr.. Barrin ItteitAit9s ,01, 'A lf : t ot '' 14 ' ,I . 4- Leicester then WAS 011C10-0 r o y li t 'i prig°'o` Lny opened tile Comati's were 11 .01 Or ar wiliol Aiii..tes" tilere ~ e d 1 41 c . ciio rp triat;'96 fof sviicrol, foices. . 1 , C 6 e