The Sun. — London, England, 1804-12-26 00:00:00

HALF-PAY OFFICERS, The particular situation of Ftalf.pay Officers being frequently ovule the topi9 of conve.r•atinn, we suh. mit the 1011 , '.ving Observations, extraded from Car. jantes's Compalliot, to the considera. tion of our Military Readers " There are many possible cases which might arise in which Half.pay Officers would he left Out of the re , c l. l of any law or regulation on account of miscondutt For instance (to repeat our own words), suppose an Officer on Flaif.pay, and dressed in the un ifn r rn of the corps to which he tance belonged, should an far forget himself, at court or in any other public place, as to be guilty of a breach of good manner, but not sufficiently gross or criminal to come within the cognizance" of the civil , power, we would ask, how is such an Officer to be tried 2 What mere law cannot reach, the received rules of honour, and the specific Artieles of War, have amply pro. vided agains'. But, according to the &thine here laid down, and indeed according to the decision of the Twelve. Judges, in Ross's case, and of the present Judge. Advocare of England, a delinquent on half.pay i s not amena bl e to any military tribunal, and may. do that at a review, in a public theatre, Or even at court, under the eye of his Sovereign, for which an (Aker on full.pay would be tried, and probably cashiered. We are prepared to meet a general reply which will be given to this case. His Majesty, it will he said, can exercise his prerogative, and strike the offender off' the list.. This is .unquestionable; our would w. attempt to enter info any discussion on µo nice and delicate a point as that of punishing a British Subjeci without any fyrm of trial, ,and without even the existence ot military 1,3 w, th ere are certain circumstances, and, al),.ve all, eertain times, Like the present, when the Executive Power ought to have a considerable latitude.. Jr is-a lati• tulle which the Constitution may, affnci, and which; we are persuaded, will. never he abused by the pre. sent possessor of it. Nevertheless, it were most devoutly to he wished, that something more specific, and more diretl could be determined on with regard to fialf.pay Officers. Whether the allowance be for past services, in the shape of colleasajiois t or be considereii as a reta;Prissi fee. import. to nor question: they are, to all irtnti:lind pur. poses, military men, ()rat Ictst oughAti: s hive been so before they quitted the active dctiis ., ,l,Co)air pro.. fession ; and, consequently, they shoilltile liable to that code of laws whiCh has been , enatied for the • support and maintainanee of good- N der and disci. pline*. When justice can be tion,Without the necessity of going into atl)itraty makings, except in 'moments of great emergency, its most' amiable channel is that of a fair and honest investigation; for we must always believe, that as the Crown iq the fountain of honour, it is also. the seat of mercy ; and nothing can be' 60 truly wounding to. an :inde. pendent mind, as to feel 'that eharaeler and fortune, under circumstances of possible misrepresentation, may be lost by a 'single fiat, when ' , perhaps, a calm judicial inquiry would have rescued bosh. 'fir all everus, policy and. public good require tharthis class of men should be at the disposal. of the Crown on several occasions ; and reason points oot how, by a single motion in Parliament, every difficulty might be removed. 41 Among a variety of other possible cases; let us, for the sake of elucidation, look at the relative si. tuat i o n Of an,Officer with his regiment, and another on half-pay, under the same circumstances of condna. We will suppose the former to have been the Superior Officer before the latter was reduced, or went upon half.pay by exchange, Lire'. and that bad blood had existed between them. We need not point out the certain consequence which world have attended both parties alike, had they, while in the regiment, made their appeal to the sword r pi sto l ; but we must ask (suppo,ing a challenge to h ave b een given by the Half-pay Officer to his heretofore Com. mantling Officer, and their intentions to have been so tar fulti!led that they met and fought), what the consequence woold be to the former, in a military point of view ? It he cannot be tried; how is the &cold of justice to he !talented between them ? The Officer uo full•pay may be tried And cashiered ; the Otlic,er half.pay, on the contrary, though,guilty of the same offeoce, and perhaps the aggressor, is not amena b le tc , any m ili ta ry, ttihunal ; and we all know, that where no mischief has been done, the parties are generally left to themselves by the civil power.. 64 Hence it is evident, that a man on balf.pay, harbouring reaentment against an Officer no full-pay, may insult him, and then fight him, without run. ning the hazard of a Court.martial .; whilst his an. tagonist is exposed to the most summary proceed. ings. It will be said, indeed, that the - King has the power of striking the former off the hall.pay list. But, surely, when the fait channel of justice can be opened, it would be more consonant to the mild character of British jurisprudence, and to , the ami. able attribute of Royal mercy, to let the culprit be openly arraigned .for his , offence. We cannot, therefore, help concluding, that every species of military charatter, most especially every individual who cmi wear the honourable badges of his proles. sion, ought to . be amenable to military jusfice. One ad of the Legishrture, on the motion of the Secre. tary of War, tuight put an end get the ridiculous questions which are afloat respecting the nature of 11411413 y ,: For, if it be considered as a compensa. tion for past services, how shall we reconcile to common sense. or justice to the public, the cases of some !motive& on that establishment who have never served at all I And if it be, what it certainly is, a eetaining fee, where is the wisdom or the policy of leaving an individual with more latitude aeon. duet during st temporary state of inactivity than is given to those with whom he hag formerly served, a nd who, according to what is understood at head. quarters, may be called upon to serve again." This sort 'of tessoping my be appliceito'the Votun teers, of whum so much has been said and written, and so little is understood. _ CHUM V. tMlTtit. Am,aelion for carrying on a suit upon a Bill of Exchange, by the Plaintiff, ai Attorney for the De. fendant ; and the whole question in the Cause was, whether this suit was carried on for this Defendant, or for a person of the name of. Douglas ; and after a full hearing of the circum , tances of the case, Mr. GAttpow for the Plaintiff, and Mr. Glues for the Defendant, the Jury - found a verdi& for the De. fendant,.. COURT OF COMMON . PLEAS, DES. 24. SITTINGS AT NISI PRIUS, BEFORE 'MR. JUSTICE BRE D AND A SPECIAL JURY BOLTON AND RICR.MAN V. ROGERS. This was an A4lion broueht by the Plaintiffs, linen.drapers, against the Defendant, one of the door.keepers at Covent.gatden Theatre, for goods sold and delivered to his wife, from whom he had been for some time separated. Serjeant SHEN-IPA)), in stating the case of the Plaintiff, - said, though he was not in reality em. ployed as C ounse l f or the wife'of the Defendant, yet the shameful manner in which she, was treated by her husband, obliged him to declare her wrongs in open Court, and he had no doubt 'of obtaining a veriii6t when he should prove why the goods were got, and that the fifteen 'pounds, which were the vatue of ahem, were all that had been charged to the Defendant for necessaries for his wife during the last three years they had lived separate. ' After the Defendant's marriage was proved, Mr. Campbell was called, who said, that Mrs. Rogers lodged in his house, and that he saw Mr. Bolton leave a parcel of linen and cotton goods at his house for her : and that, from what he knew of her, he considered her conduit as meritorious. On hircross.examination, he said he had, some time ago, summoned•ivh. Rogers for a small sum of money, for the purpose of trying the experiment whether he was liable to'. pay her deb's ; but did not succeed, not being able , to prove the mirriage. Mrs. Campbell, wife to the formetwitneas, stat ed, that some wearing apparel had been left with her by Mr. Bolton for Mts. Rogers. She, could not take upon her to say whether all the articles mentioned in the bill produced were at the time wanted by her ; but they were such . things as a woman in her line should have, as she could not earn her bread without -appearing decent, as she used to go about to-Gentlemen's houses with smell ing bottles and trinkets cocci% • On her Cross;examinatioo, she said,'she could not take, upon her to say how much the Defendant earned at the Theatre,. but she had heard that some people earned a deal of money there. Serjeant BEST said, he also hail heard that some people earned a deal of money there ; that he had heard of an astonishing young Gentleman there lately, who earned fifty pounds a night ; but that was not the case with his poor Mrs. Cuff deposed, that she lived. about three years go in the; same house with Mrs, Rogers, who had at that time separated from her husband ; she remembered that,one Sunday evening the D,..fendant came, and asked for Mrs. Rogers. She not being at home, he waited for. her, anti when she came in he asked Ifer for his property ; she said she had got none of his ; he then took her muff from tier, and buttoned it ,under his 'Coat ; too k h er h an dk erc hi e f off her neck, and est:piled out her pockets ; and, after sona-e words had' passed between them, he struck- her, still asking her for his property, and she saying. she had .not gut it : she at length got away from his hold, and- was attempting to get under the bed, when he threw the candle and candle. stick: tit hcr, calling her all the vita names that could possibly be thought of. He then -went sway, and in a few days came again's. Mrs, Rogers, on-seeing him, attempted- to make her escape over the yard wall, bat he seized tier, and brought her into the imbue, and having' stripped all her clothes .off, except her shift, beat her in a most dreitlful maw. net, and knocked her down: the witness then went ont to 'get some person to. interfere, and when she ,was coming back she saw Mrs. Rogers running out 011ie house without any thing on her but her shift; she then saw the Defendant gathering up her clothes, but could not say whether he-took them away or not, and never saw any misconduft on the part of Mrs. Rogers : she a f terwar d s h e a r d t h ey li ve d' to. , gether. . • John Hardy, saw Mrs. Rogers almost naked in the meet, anal held his coat over her until she got into a house, where the Defendant brought her clothe., and left them there. • , . Sarah .Brown deposed,' that shelves et a work, house in ,the= neighbourhood of Clerkeowell, then kept'lty a Mr. M'Kenzie; ,that-thePefendant and another man brought Mrs, Rogers there in a back. ney.emich ; 'when she was - on the steps, ihe held by the rails, and did not wish to go in, but the De. fendant forced her; she afterwards heard him tell the* keeper th.a.she wotild be wanting'clean',sheets, and a tv-(1 to !tersef,. but not to let her have 'them. Mrs. Itorrs retn,lined there for eight or ten days, and then site.ittlped her to escape over the garden plc. Mr. and Mrs. Rogers afterwards lived to. gether, and she lived with them as servant for Ave 'months, during WhiCh time "Mrs. Rogers kePt the hnuse entirely by her Own earnings ; he beat her two or three tune, a . week she has seen him - catch her by the neck, and hold her until she was black in the face. Charles Cobham, Who lived in the chambers un. .dir the Defendant and. his wife in Lion's-inn, gave evidence as to the general ill:treatment that Mrs. Rogers received from her husband ; .and that one 'night', when he interfered, Mr. R. being half of the window, and a crowd about the door, the Defendant threatened to' knock mini down: biit 'at appeared, from bia -crosi.eitaininatiiin, that he and the Defendant had quarrelled about an satnissioil ticker to Vatbahali, ' w hi c h the 'Witness had as . on e i of the Musicians, and'Which the Defendant; w h was a duor-keeperthere, charged him with handing over to another person. The porter at Lion's Inn gave his testimony to the same rffiet. Mt. Hughes, treasurer to Coient.garden heatre, said, that.tl►e Defendant's' salary was twit* shillings a night, and some small perquisite for 'keeping Meat LO N DON $ Printed by RIORARD H&uil t, (o(No. 4 , miroot-court, Ilow-Strett); and Publithed WlL:a a ie Awl; as* Sot [tint, (of South Holton At thr. - Sloti6Oiritc t, No. ii r, Strand ;- white Sivrrtiterinifi, f.) reit ft fot the Paper,' keturs'fit th e 1,4t 0 p, 4c, ((ottapaid),. .Itreet t; ST2ltl won:magic ; I mutt hr LAZY REPORT. CPURT Of KING'sBENTC/f. HASL,E K 7. VARLEY, • This was an Adion upon four Bills' of Exchange for nine guineas each, payable to the . order of the Plaintiff, given to him in consideration of his luiv. ing given up the benefit of an agreement he had with the Wet Dock Company fo'r excavating the earth in part of 'the Dicky to the Defendant. The defence set up by Mr. ERSKINE for the De. &titian' was, that the Defendant had no benefit whatever from this engagement. The person who drew these bills on the Defendant, who had accepted them, was not the partner of the Defendant, nor had any general authority to draw bills on the Defendant; but these bills ; were drawn uftbn a specific consi. deration, which had failed. The Plaintiff had a con. mid with the Wet Dock Company for excavating _the earth, and the agreement was drawn up on the I 4.th of June, the day on which the bills were drawn. Three persons, one of whom was the Plaintiff, had entered into this contrad, and he tranferred' his right to the Defendant, who agreed to give him these bills ; but if the consideration for which they were given failed, the Plaintiff might recur to his original right as between him and the Wet Dock Company, but he could not re.:, cover against the Defendant. The Defendant's case was this, and he understood he should prove it, that at the time when this agreement was en. , tered into, it was fraudulent on the part of she Plaintiff, Mr. Halle, because' lie had foifeited his agreement with the Wet Doek Compatik, And therefore was not in a condition to convey any thing of value upon, it to the Defendant; and that'the tiff knew the Defendant could not take any thing by if. If these Bills had been indorsed away, and; were in the hand s of a third person for a valuable con s i. derat inn, and mho knew nothing of the circumstances at the time of taking the hills, there could be node. fence, hut, as that was not the casn, the Defendant was at liberty to spew that the consideration for • which' the Bilk were given, had failed, and if he did so, the Defendant would be entitled to a verdiet. This ease, however, the Defendant did not make out in evidence, and therefOre the Jury found' a vet. did for the Plaintift—Darnages 3SI. • NUTT V, lIUTLER. Mr. GI aas stated this to be an anion to recover a'amall sum of money of the. Defendant, in conse. (pence of the Plaintiff having sold to him the, good. will • of a inills.walk, anti let him a cellar at, Ken. sington, where the business Was carried oa, and sold some pails, &c. to him. There were some Aermer,o sold also, but 86 they were:attacked to /be dwelling, they could, not be chattels which c ou ld ; b e ca ll e d 44 Goods sold and delivered," he was,aoprehensive his Lordship would rote that,to be the Law ; which his Lordship did, andthe rest of the case was proved for the Plaintiff. Mr. PULLEk t on the part of the Defendant, called two witnesses- to chew ,that the •agteement, was pot made between the Plaintiff' and the'Defendani, but with the Delendaot's daughter, WhO was a married woman, and that the goodwill of this Walk was not worth 21. instead of fol. &C. The Jury found a verdict for the Plaintiff—Da. mazer) soh .9s. ?CUM' V. THOUP3OII. Mr. Grans stated 'this to be an Adion Upon two promissory notes given by the Defendant to John Twig, payable to the Plaintiff; or order ; one dated nth Oa. 'due in January Taos, am! the otlir on the 9th of December, payable at one month. The De. fondant was the drawer in favour of Twig, and he indorsed them to the Plaintiff; and that was the Plaintifricase,: unless there was some answer to itc:; but he understood there was a deed executed by 'the creditors of Twig, by which they agreed not to sue or molest him for any debt now due from him •to them. for. 9e)- years; to this deed the Plaintiff was a party, but that was noshing, for they- had a right to release him altogether, but that did not discharge the drawer, for he had no remedy against the person to whom he promised to pay ; not so, if they had agreed not to sue the Drawer, for if' they. had agreed to excuse. the Drawer, the notes • would have been at an.,en4. The. Notes being proved -.-r! „ Mr. Famine, for the Defendant, said, he should . prove that these Notes t%ere,given for the aeons. modation of Twig, without any consideration, and that the Plaintiff knew it, In point Of law he sub. mitred that the moment a verrlid . was, recorded against Thompson, be would have an affirm against Twig, so that, this. would,be contrary to the deed to which the Plaintiff was a party, by, which they covenanted not to molest , sue, or trouble T w i g , for 99 years, for any debt now due from him. Lord ELLEWBOILOUGSI thought„„if, liereitfter,' Thompson might bring :Manion against Twig in, consequence of this verdict, it could not be said, to* he for any debt now due from Twig, for that would depend upon the condition of, , whether Thomson should pay it or not • and therefore this adion was not repugnant to the deed by which the Plaintiffco. venanted not to sue, molest, or trouble. Twig for 99 years, on account of any debt now,due tram &c. Verdict for the Plitintiff—Danirgett 45 61 . ss. :sd. FARROW ro, SCAlit. An Aftion by a Publican, against the Defeodante the Captain of a ship, for money paid, laid out, and expended by, the Plaintiff for the Defendant at his request—money lent him, and fur board and lotting at the Plaintiff's house. GAR ROW said the Plaintiff's demand amnunt. ed to upwards of 701. but he would ask a verdict only for 54f. ,becauie to chat amount the D e f en d ant had acknowledged the demand. This was proved by two witnesses ; the one )uhn Todd, tailor to the Defendant ; the .other Hanfiab Turner, the' Plaintiff's servant, who swore that the Defendant had admitted the, charge of tha. Plaintiff was just up to the time of his accident,. which acci. dent was that of the Defendant having shot himself in the head, but of.which he was now recovered. Mr. EltsXll4a observed, that hit Client, the De. fendant, seemed to have ownhot himself. Verdict for the Plaintiff-I)3mages, tat. Gnat, ; and thathe had a benefit every year, if he had a mind to take it : by his last year's benefit be made upwards of Tool. - Serjeant Bssr made a very long speech, and en deavoured to shew that the Defendant's income wss not sufficient to allow his wife these kind of clothes; and also, that her conduft was not so good as it ought to be: he called some witnesses to prove,this, and that she was well able to support herself by gilding china; a business at which she earned a . great deal of money before she was married to Mr. Rogers. The Jury, without hearing Serjeant Sit E rit EAT) in reply, or a charge from the Learned Judge, found a verdict tot the Plaintiff—Damages r5l. 199. Bd. LEWES, DEC. 24. The extraordinary fecundity of Mr. Attree'e Chinese sow; has been More than equalled by one the property of Mr. Esher, of tie .Half Moon public honse, on the Lund6n Road, between God.. stone and Croydon, which, in the si ace of eleven months, farrowed 6 t pigs ; the first - and second time, she had zo each, and the ti rd 21. On one night last week ten ewes, the property of Mr. Heath, of Pulborough, yeaned it lambs; ninc of them having produced twins, and one tritOrg• On Saturday evening a loir man named Pollat4 on his return from this town to Ilford, was stoltii on the high-way, a little beyond . the Wheeler s« yard, in Southover, by two footpads with mititaTY foraging caps on, and robbed of 4 3. ; 61 . all the.. money he had about him, with which the v illains decamped. The snow was so drifted on 'Wednesday nigh t, by the high wind, at Bexhill, that`a number of , newly-eretted huts there were literally buried, and the men within them very aukwardly imptisonett': till they could be liberated by a number of,tbair' comrades, who, with great labour, • removed tilt' snow with entrenching tools. On Thutsday last a private .of the First kOllll Dragoon Guards, whilst standing in the, rqnkw N 3 rwich) was taken wi:ih a yioient tit 61,c(n.ighing!. when he broke a blood.vessel, and died,on.the.bi?f,„ I R Tli . the i6th inst. at Auch.unick, Scotrod, Mrs. C "' Grant, of a Son. MARRIED. On the r4th inst. at Aberdeen, John Mot:chat!, lisp Advocate, to Mrs. Wright, daughter of Captain Christ:ea zit!' aid widow of till: late joint Wright, Esr.j. younger, of BaWelty. On Thursday, by special licence, john Rrpadley, Esq. o f thu Borough,,So.ithwark., to Miss Letitia Ulp*atn, daught4 or Sir :Matthew 21oxion, M. P. Last Friday, Mr. Edmond Bandell, of Ludgate-hill, to Miss Cope, daughter.of T. Cope, Esq. of Ferichittenretrect, On the. :6th inst. at Newhills,, Scotlend, the 'Pev dovick Grant, Minister at Nlethliek, to Miis Barbara lirovin, daughter the late 'Rev. : Or. john Brown, _ - of On ,hc t9i It inst. at Bo,ness, Scotland,' MO:Gcork;:. Hen. derOn, !Merchant; to Miss Ages iturlter, daughter en . "late Captain James Hunter. . On Irklay mo rning ia I 4 u s -. -t -Waal:non, Mrs. Fo/Ar i l , wife 4 ' 4 "Pisan I 4113C4:FOS1Td!,01Aip WtsT tait)s . ter V oltaoteet Ca vatry. . On Saturvy evening, at her •morlier's, in street, Liverpool, in kr isth year, Miva_,lierricglroplapd ,, daughter of the late Peter Freeload, tsq. ' • Greikt Geo rgC. Lately, on 'board the Swiltstire, on his passage'ta Gibral. tar, in the 35th year of his , age, Dr. Henry liowleS. Ott the lath inst. at Edinburgh, Mr. Robert Smith, Writer in Edinburgh, late in Elgin.. Lately 'at 'her house, St. A n drew's -square , Glas g ow, Nliss Ma rgery Amour, daughter of the late Mr. Andrew Amour, or Glasgow. 2(1 year On the irith inst. at Dundee , in the 7 of her age,. Mrs. Magdalene Fyili, daug hter of the late 13:110 Fyife, Esq.` c ' t. Dn ' l " - :.__-_---...." . _ . To THOMAS TA 111.4()R, Esq. - • - No.-9, New Bridge-Street, t.onden. Honoured Sir, ,' . Edinburgh, March illy 1801. BEG ' eth the es Venel, leave Co inform yciu, that ever sitKe.ttie I year 1790, 1 have been ahlietd rear which, from its obstinately' resistin wi g every Lucourse or Medicine prescribed by the most eminent of the Faeulty nere, and uudergoiog several severe courses of salititldo• arid twice (list:barged .fronl the Hospital,' with little•relie f, would appear to be of the roost inv ete rate .tete nature.. •in the spring of Lest Yee( My 'disorder had nearly to put a period' to my existence-1 had a ,lirgelilcer 'on the crown et my head, owe on each arm, and 'my ll' were broke eat in a frightful ,manner ;, sny , right was, drea fully painful, and had been in a }ta two latge no des' bit It• mof ulcerAtioti for thfs last seven years; my left had . alsro was very Much'disColoared,' and gave me -such excri.lta! ini; pain, particularly when warm in bed, as D early. to.,4C prive ;Re of rest ; - in this lamentable state,.l wag !:.P2'; tuencted by Mr. ). Thoinpsor4 (who received so ...grtiai• Cure by th em here), to take your . Leakei Patent,Pals, . Which 1 wow -.to cio on th.o..a6th of Ni f ty .in the. tong of a Fortniglit, I began to -receive benetit-liii little .Wrote than a month, the ulcers on' tilt' head and'. arms wr ( d ! ' soundly healed ; --aeon after; the sores - on; till ic . .g.,.,5, P ll f a tb c e alto; leaving, however constuerable dif5 1 9,4 1 41 1 11 ) el let.: . s . S i t U ik i n c if iggl u b l t i a C e tan :M G : l ll P r t i a t ' cli t : 2l t el 'n : l y t S al u t i :t ee 3 li sitieti .bat: t r .r e ll th 7in t f l i a t h le L : re t i t l i ' :Od i rt y r i:: f : i r ri l nil n ilit : : : (7;- : il o ll,l. 4 ) , Li i n t l?a lte iai_i i , "; i regainio4 its natural hue, and theiweliatial. lt ' i Me. going oil. I thus became b • liberal adviCe' ait . , y your have recovered ow 'farmer spirits awl ,Arrertgth.r„;,„,,l ai noi ll ft; came jelly and fat„..ir. which ,state liaVkinlS 44, !'!'t" -- 'farreA ; Months tit the ' fsionisliment of till Who knew In e i,„ 4 , vow, ' a . losSin tvhat terms' to ex rtes my gtatitirdes but “," 7 ,' i vy for the goad of other AotWokt. ni,-ittals, tQ• make .X l " 7 b • fuse as putilic,AS, possible, as I sliAll air every oeG 3 s7 i ' in so doing; you - will greatly' obedient, very humbleservant, ALEX. MUltiCklW" 06:vmanTikliCeim9srcs?'"0111114trici,g:hsw;e0s1s.rteo4tad4)abilibe:bi:trure..t.thitS•rire--: Yalu gr'7C ' ill .font' 14,1'h:rosily °ld As 3 se t tn N b e ly w Z , :s z e it , r t v d i t abruker g tn4.lll4 , 1' re oared an:.i SOW hi the Sole liroprietor, Tito.uks TA YI. 0 a', Metriber'of the 'Royal College of 'Sur" *eons, 4t his House,. NO. 9 s , Now Bridge- stree t, Londo n ; 'where,:after a constant residence ' of more than tIIWY..I, years, in ,a pi - Az..lice particular.l 'direr:tett to. the Cure 0 , ' venereal . 'Complaints and those ineidental to the h Parrtsi af Generation; witht,that inviolanle. secrecy, ,whi •iiis ..profc.sion,should always observe in such cases, V tatitaartemaitierrlfstleltirisTlbSytt6ir,rtheeThatlirilvsicte4kaiinutl as t s t ist s i . n m ce edi 'h c e i lr s aftt iv it i o a n ,:o i l i d. .cliiit4 ming Public,. as . an. 0 911 44 .05— dnA attainable l m sosol,by . a i n li d s v a ° p i P l o c i e nr a tn il tr an ' l nf; b ` i ft i r it ' Y th . 6 ' convrki ence °I those hying at a ,distance,' at the lletfumer's, No. '3s'• S l ' hiban's-s‘reeti., Pall-Mall A, the Toyshop,- No. io3t. (Pg . ford-street ; Mr:. I)l4r:rough's, No, 7, PA.: street- 11111# Mt. Ste e l's, Bookseller, No r,' Union-rowo Little ToWeri hilt ; - Mr . Baxtcr's,..SouttiOnidge,, idinbuigh; ;qr. i'v. ll : slanald, Glasgow ; Mr. C .L 1 1 tvel Ps, Dublin i :gui.: .. b,,y an person in 'every considerable town in Great Brtrairt-'('`. 'lr e' I land, in lloies of oily es. nd: • eitch, sealed. bp. wall ful l anti plain, direetionst -+•wheteny ;persons of either seg . 114 cure thernselve ? with4ase,.spet-4, secrecy, anti safety. ~..y. N. B. Vvrry.Boxsold'in t :teat Britain is vcalvd up wo'' It S.tetnpt on whico,-- by 12YOUP of -the COnimissionest f. printed, at the Stainp-()ii:ce -- " T. Taylar,, o. N o ' Blitize•-street," — to A n imitate +xii is I elcny, and all'orheri mere COunterfaits: --..........-.'