The Sun. — London, England, 1801-03-20 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF PEERS, THURSDAY, MARCH 19. Lord C n t townv and other Peers presented themselVes to be sworn, but, in consequence of an observation from the-Eat tof DaRSY respeaing the strictness and Order 'A tha House relative to the hour of swearing, taking seats, *Fr the proceeding did not 'take place. • A Petition was presented by the Bishop of DCRIIAM front certain Debtors confined in the Gaol of Durham,and also twopthe.rs by the Earl of Mo tan, from certain per sons confined oh the Same acconni, in Other places, pray ing relief; Sce.—All which - were ordered to lie on _the Table. T.AY.LORDIVOItCE , . The Order of the Day being read for simimoning their Loidihips upon the commitment of this Bill,. the House accordingly:resolvod itsoll inhia.Commivec, Lord %VAL- . 61NnHAM 111 , the Chair. . . . The Marquis. e f ~BUCKINGHAM rose to make his proraised.Motion, for the introduaion of a proviso into the Bill, prohibiting' the inter- Marriage of the offending . Parties, during, the life time Wit- . TAY LOR, His Lordship prefaced it with a Speech of some length, in which he pro fessed *MA to argue upOn the general principles which the Clauie included ; that had been already argued atsuch length, and with so much ability, . as to leave it totally unnecessary for hint to tfts_ pass in that , way upon their Lordships. What. ever difference of opinion ?night obtain. as to the general question, the magnitude. of the evil which 'it was proposed to remedy, was • acknowledged by all side, of the House ; and though' a Strong difference of opinion certainly existed respett ing the Bill he alluded to, he rather thought the objeaionS Of, those' who opposed Were . not in toro,. but that all agreed. that there may exist many cases to which the principle of that Bill may be applied with the best possible effeas, and to those he' particularly wished to address himself in the present instance. - The Noble Marquis then adverted. to the particular 'point under the consideration of the Committee,. and with a view to evince that what he should propose was' founded in precedent, at least its principle, he described ,the leaditig circumstances ofseveral remarkable Divorce Cases, which occur. red as Well before as . since the Reformation, par ticularly the cases of Lords PARR /Of ,and BRUCE, in which instances legiSlative provisions, similar in, spirit to that which he was about to propose, were recurred to. 'He likewise commented upon the well-knoWn case of. the Duke and Tiutchess 'of' NO ft rotit in r 69 t . H i e ixpresi&l himself aware that actable man might draw, with a - degree ofplatisi..- bility, inferences frOas these cases, very different Jim those ,drawn-by hiM ; but he would con. tend, that in every Bill, such as that before the Committee, it was fit the parties . shOuld ex pressly and unequivocally know the intentions of, the Legislature. Such a 'great and interesting Question should not be left undecided. Adverting again to' the particular Case before the Comthit_ tee, he observed, that he'had'no knowledge what, ever, of the'patties or of the case, save froth the ,1,-.1; v....4,i fit their Lordships' Bar; butt frona'What he could collect, it was as' fOul attOrfen.et - as any the "human imagination could suggest, and this, particularly, when he consider. ed the heinoes ceridn'a ofthe 'Reverend Objea it. He was shocked at such-depravity in a ulster of the Gospel.. He would - wish to see the charaCter ,f the' Ministers . of: the Established Churelt . pure and onsullicd, and, if possible, as free from stain as that heaven to which a stria . observance.'of diEtates 'Must one day. lead us. The present case he thought the more aggravat ed, as 'occurring in an obscure Country, Town, More than two hundred miles from the Metrop o . lis, the, centre of gaiety, and fashionable dissipa. tion—yet in that retreat was' this criminal Ivo-. man, anda'nore criminal paramour, the. Minister of her Parish, to he found.•, Sue's conduit deserved universal reprobation, and' well merited the inter positiOn'of the Worthy Bishop of that Diocese: Hey confessed that, in .discussing the proposed Clause, he had rather the general question was Icktst'but of the . purviewof and that it should be considered with a reference to the ,merits of the particular case before the House. He then prhposed the'Clatise, which was to the7efreer he fore.trieutiOned, and went to. enaa, "That itshall not be 'lawful for the said Catherine .Birchall. Taylor ilitMilirly:with the said WilliaM best. Birdwslod, Clerk, during the life.time of the said George Taylor, &c. tet.P! On the'questton being Pitt,. 'The .ari! of . C/4 rose shortly but. de eidedli to express his disapprobation of the,Clause. He agreed with - the .Noble 'Marquis, that the par. ties ought be aPiri s co o,f the Law,' and, that the question had been ably disCueted, and what was the . result ? The Honse decidedly set its' face against a lill,which involved.the prtneiOleupon which the Clause proceeded. His sentiments upon the question . reitained' unaltered at the same time no Peer. could more ddisreeateor detest the abominable crime of adulte r y ;th a n himself. He should cheerfully join in "'the support °h illy meh. sure which would tend to' suppress ; 'Su& regulations as that, proposed; he thouht;woald Itay. a aintrary 'effefi; . and .in either 'joint - of view, he disapproved the application of ihe prin. rifle in question •tts an. individual case. Lord AtiqUANJJ': in' treating the stibjea displayed his" usual ability—after slightly refir:: "Ting 'to• the precedents adduced by the -Noble Allarquis, with whom . he seemed to - 'agree ,in his inferences, he appealed, to their Lordships whether the evils then the. contemplation 'of the HOusa i , and _which were 4aiiyinckezoing,.(fid tot require some remedy ? Should- they-be suffered to, go on unrOrained ?-He *airiest With the Noble Matquis, that, the question ought not to be left floating or undecided; "either a Specifie' clause in any. Aid, or a general clhitsa. deelara tory of the Law on this-peint,.should he adopted. if the Legic;l:eore slould'unibitnnately.so - hrd.lll,, that the °finding patties ,perrnitted, to intprottry,.then he must ',gay that-an tinitrarrick! malt vpAy adaressei ro.a.married 'as to a single w0man...241e .agreed also . with's:the Noble Marquis in , his idea tha,t - the'prosent a very agjravated ease.—Let the House consider the case of a Clergyman, the Minister of a Pari6h, . who for years past was notoriously in the habiks of committing Adultery, remaining in .a;situa_ tion where he was Weekly.; in •the habits- of proclaiming the Divi*e Commands against . Adul tery ; such a thing should not besinfered. • • Lei them consider it a little farther, and. conceive.the • efred ofthe woman,. whowas known to be thegui I ty paramour, and such person. coming, afterwards to , the same Cluirch as his Wife, and seated in the most conspicuous:, pew in the place. The in.. creasing evils loudly 'call for a _better Code of Divorce Laws than those now existing.: one great objection against the present - system was, that it only operated to the relief of the rich'- the great expences attending the process of - .Di vorces, absolutely excluded the poor'. Tbe'pre-. 'sent mode of proceeding with'resped to. Divorce Bills, also constituted ,to his mind an objection against theexistink", system—lle really believed, that .he was 'then addressing' as pure and" hotiour•. able 'an assemblage of men as cOuld. possibly be - found but - still, when he considered the ! . great. nesi of their number 7 -:-the attributes of all' collece tive bodies—thi: much' greater number of 'the other . branch of the Legislature---the whale , making an aggregate, ' of • nearly iOOO persons---, and, the influence of the human passions .in .suc h large assemblies, he must think, that the present mode of proceeding in those Cases, would always be attended with great inconvenience. In con cluding, we- understood his Lordship to expre:e, his decided approbation of the Clause.... His Royal 1-Eglmessihe DUKE of CLARENCE observed, that the before the Committee was avowedly for the relief of Mr.. Taylor, and, as it_ was natural to suppose, drawn up under-his di reftion by his SOlicitor, yet pointed at no such prohibition with respeei to Mrs . - Taylor as that: ended by the proposed Clause. Such a circum e Stance did not seem to have: entered into his contemplation. He therefore must `submit it ' to - .their Lordships, how, consistently with' the 'principles 'of Humanity, and, he must say, of'' Christian Charity, they could 'enter tain. that' which must throw . the miserable woman, . the objea of ,the Clause,: into eter. nal prostitution ? The ACt before the Commit. tee' was .to dissolve the' marriage of Mr. Taylor with his now wife, and to • enable him to marry again, and mat to punish, perhaps an already too miserable woman. With respea to himself, the, more he considered the' Sahjed, the snore he .was satisfied with the rei:litiide. of. the . patt .. he had' taken. Did he think the prnposed measures likely.. to.prevent the efinie . of Adultery, no one would more ehearfully support, them ; but .the contrary NV as his decided etinvietion. He reprobated the . • principle alluded to, as. operating most injurmus.• Yi as - well as unjustlyc. with-loped to lbe,fe... males of this-Country, yho,Were its brightest Qr.-. nament, and, generally:speaking, remarkable for their vi rtues .and: correctness ofeeondud, 'He firmly - believed, that,' in the .geate majority of those instances where the conjugal .vow was broken, the profligacy of the man Was the prin. cipal cause ; at,the same. time he was aware that in some,eases the fault rested with the woman ; there were, unfortunately; among the sei, some meretricious, and infamous tharaderi,an . dsoch, he thought, deserving of the severest punishment. For his own fart, he.had continually before him the brightest patterns of domestic. virtpc and conjugal affedion—in Ha rr whO 'filled that Chair :(pointing to the Thronr) 'and. was so justly the object of their Lordships' reverence and affec.. tion. Such a : bright eXimple,. he 'was de termined, as far as in hiM lay, 'to imitate, and' to persist. in his detestation of the - destrue. tive crime of Adultery. Itkurring to the , -general- question, His Royal Highness proceed, ed td, ,observ'e, 'that the consideration of .the • charaders of both sexes respeetively • were uptin • Very 'different grounds. In this Country, a mad of adequate talents and an entcprisinb spirit .may rise to _the, highest (Aces of the State, or to opulence the most extensive, .ndtwithitanth ing his charader might be justly forfeited on ac count of his committing she crime in . question, or even on account of treachery: to his friend in the perpetration of that crime. With -a woman it was the re verse---her charader, once. : sacri. fleas that way, every • thing was lost', to her, and it was perhaps iMpossible',tO restore her charader but one 'way, and that the pro. posed 'clause went 10 do away, which if th e House adopted, it would stated pledged to a codsiderable extent. In observing upOtr the fatal consequences which the adoption of s • och . a, prin ciple would be to the unfortunate ohicets of it, he "said; that a new class of femalei,, sikladed from general society, would.be created by it ; those would he driven to prOreii ....scitoda'prostitution, or to live with their paramours,' from which pumheis of illegitimate children would most probably arise. If the measure in contettplation was pro posed 'as a punishthent, why not extend t 'to both the offending patties ? In'illustratiOn of this liar t 6f his argument', the Royal Duke to,a cat: Of,ccinsidera* aggravation, (we'believe that of :Addison, now pendiug before their Lord. •ships) in which the l4tisban . d.Wai . ctonvidea nOt only 'of udultery, but with the' Sisierof his own . iarife,whosehusband was his ixitticular friend ; `that surely: w - as:a:CiSe to which the principle ; ' not posiility they' for inert think, in such an instance, Of pinnihing the ionocent and unoffending woznan by a prohibition from a ftiture marriage, and letting `itieh a huslmilit go unpimi;hed P.' . . . The . 4 31 1 . of lii NNOU r. spoke iivexplanation. [vee rei4re; that want of room restrains us to a ver y *go= nerai uut hat: ,ofguo4t part of the remaining Dcbated The Earl of RADNOR called. the .:ittentiqn of the liouse to the possibly unflivourable effed which the adoption of the Clause - would have on ale passiiig of Mr. Taylor'i Gentleman. who Will uoiversaily ngreed to be well'entitled "to Relief. Lar;,l G1e2;.V11,14E spoke very ably, and at. come, lengtli,in , support of' the . Ciause. He .re— trettid t h at the' g eneral principie should be thus prematurely brought into discussion. f)efore a Re-- vercnd Prelate; llten'in . his place, had *performed his promise of last year, of bringing forward a on the . sulijal ) tut which he hoped wat.still intended Ity:liirn: aria he Observed,: that* the case then before ":the Courinittee•• afforded 'an additional, and a very , strong instance of the he .cesity of re-constaeruier the ;.present- sys - terat-of ifie-p'vorce Law, and of the . application of some C.:lfedual remedy. , Lord KUL-CR.4I'E, in arguing •agitinst.-the-, proviso, repeated many of. those points-bet had- so. • ably adt ance4.l .• against the Fink irie, in qttestion_ when the'. Ilnded: to *as under.: disttAsigtL; lasteat . With respeel partleitiar:elfse, he:suggested, that if the Eeclesitistitdr Cede wi mitred it, the .trlprit :sliculd•be ptinishr:dl but depriving: hiln of funetlatis". would • be • doing.yery-little 2 —rhy yen, iri-fatt“ straining of a Gnat and swallowing - ''.Camel!' by: attertitt in.g.to 'prohibit ht, marriage ‘="::oinan'.kitlf whom he' had been four ye..rs.living in all4tlteiy. . The 11;546 of' ROCHENTF,R,- in '•• support of 'the glutfsei...sp)ke at sotne length, and . displayed his usual. zicumeri.:ana- energetic *eloqUence. saik• that• consistently with the ;sentiments he. i for,uly: fl-It the' heinous clime of Adultery, andiron! which no consideration - would induce him to we'rvt.,-hc Shouid stlipc.iTt the pro'..• vtso cuoVed by', the Ni 61.6 MargaiS, fie thought that the interdiditin should he general, but which consideration tli:1 nut pre;.lutle - the propriety -of its. application in a partieu:ar instance. The P.AVerend Prelate yi.x,ke in ;:ppropriate language of eonduka of th,t ClericAllMinquent,and ex, hibited it in• a still mote. criminal view, by `scribitig the nature and importance of his sacred futcnions, as a Minister ~of .the Gospel ; a more horrible case, hi:4 Lordship observed, •could'not be imagined. He petfe4ly agreed — with' thbsi Peers Who thought such a person de*erving of the most exemplary ecclesiastial punishments, andin . this•parc of tut speech he touched 'up . on the • fUre and constitution of the Ecclesiastical Courts After coniidering at sonic .'length' the 'general Question, 'and evincing *the neees'sity , of the adop • Lion of ''some decisive remedies; he'-passed thei partieultir Case before the' Committee - ; • and it; speling the that The" adoption of tl - .eClaute might pOsiibly have aim :unfavourable effect, iii regarobjeCtion, e d - to . tith pasveng sin actinittitig of •the. Bill, it ob to served,' that the hi: iyelt:_ founded,. ought. not to withhold them from doing What theyfelt: to be right—as it was7well known,: that in many case 4- individual interest shoill4 give way to ptiblie consideration. - • • The Question wits' now Called' for, When-- ' The LO RD. CHA NCI:116 k rose, andln de.. liVering his teritimetits upon the Question.befOre the Cortimitt4, took' a legal view of some of the points connected with it s and referring to the precedents' adduced . by the - Noble "Marquis in the early part of hii..Speech,•partieularjy.to 'thit, of the case' of Lord Bxv CE, obterVeti; that no Issue of Law obtainedupOir W hat was, or . was not a legal :Marriage ;- that considerittiori lay entirely with theEccltsiiistieal Court's-. His iiordship proceeded to state that the prat. tiee 'of other •Protestaat Countries, particularly of Scotland and Holland, decidedly was to declare the marriage of the Adulterer with the Adulteress IA this ,Country. the Law had been-left in a state . of uncertainty, nothing having been' deioeti by the Common Law upon the subjeel: In leis Lordship's opinion, theiegis lature 'eight tO , express a distindt scntitnent re_ spedling' the future illegality, of such marriages, but at the saute time to - remove w ) y apprehensions that in such a case m ight • be' entettameit,' that their Lordships, ought to - ;icktiowledge the legi. timaoy of the issue. from • past Marriages entered into lazier suoheireurnstances. Lord CL A RE• said, that inotwithstaading all that he had heard from Noble Lords, or from • the - Right Reverend Prelate, :was" not satisfied in his Own mind,: that'the Clause proposed would. prove a check to- the fanning of well 'conneetionsi • nor-Could - he appta.e of 'the infrodaliiin stieli a Clause into a - Private which. 'might. insitS consequences .Tce t the' private 'rights' of many . individuals,and rear.h "to an extent of whkh many Noble Lords mizht not be aware. \Vold& it heprOper or advisable, or were their lordships; prepared to say, that :by. such a LegislatiVe de clration . of the X.4aW, they • were rentbi pro-- tloutice, viatially, a sentence ;Of bastardy- - agl'itiit the issue Of marriages SO:contr. - idled and 'which,' as to the matter oftlw . , were heretofore consi-- dere& as of a doubtful tiatUre ? With regard to his own sentiments on 'the subjeff, his linrdship, confessed' that they were nfavour of, t h e if not of the propriety of such Marriages. He cofisidered the' Nitarrhtge - Ceremony roI?e of the •, nature of a Civ il:contraa betwyeen tsv Parties, and. that if that compa4t.was declared null, hisppinion was, that , ;theizartiptoverentliberty to enter Into a new. contOlt, fie' begged their - Lor2ships tocon sitter that tticthrsegtience - Oradopting the proposed Clause woad be° tcv . g.ile.,a Legislative declaration in a Private hilve the effeo of a Gefierak.l44o.'4lAtn,t4ife.validity . of such con tradtse nut If.istn2h2ri'elaitst ,were•irdOpted, the House tv4 to delare that .all such Oesh. fo tined under the: ci reum stances. which had. been:Si:iced; "'s re legal as to tie security of real'and pprspnal 'tights, . to the' • issueof'such:Martiages t - His • liordship - repeated that . his iciz the adoption of - a Clause in a. Private . .. till, a :Legislative sandlion to =settle a - dis,itited luestiOn. He per:. agreed that the OF•nding Clergyinan ought never to.be-suff;;red to officiate itt that-charatier. die appeeltetided that :the. power of •the.:BiShop Was sufficient:for that purpose, and that he..*oirld never be suffer , e . ti to disgrace h in England'. But his Lordihrp not'agret that if that man should by' the introduction of the Clause, to .cast the womp':out. into the wide ;world, and expose her to ProStitution,. Or that ifte was stiffered eo - marry boy other woman, that the &ample - wotilit'be less •an evil, than by m aiVing* - : her wltom he had seduced from her 11 coniugal vow c.');,: in, his opinion, the-only , re , tributjon Which . he "th'ild 'make to .Society fot`the offence he had cOmrhittcd, would -be t 9 ".that woman,' and rtMs: - to retaihrt his eefleclion sentiments of lit itence4nd 'Morality. Ife,saw. no sufficient reason to deviate in this iostancea . .froth a general role, Merely because this offender Was a Priest, for if nor degraded from this. office, , he apprehended his Bishop would have both the • ,power and the - disposition to refuse him indudion to a Living, or . a Licence to a Curacy. His - Lordship said that his opinion on this subjeft was, that if a general Law was passed, compelling -every-Adulterer she-Adulteress, and ihat : •-•• 4* every person setting•oirt on -the tradebf sed.ue e - tion t was to do so with the terror of matrimony befdte:liiik.. it .wciUtir.iiigteit-evintekrea.!Lilly - to- - 'iisrevcnt t • crime f Vir . any other means thaf. t.otild'biaeiri!ea: If any ; doubt. re. . mained to bC cleated:up on: this subjefl,•it ought to be done: by getit4Sl Lain ; .at all.events, he considered it a point of?public Justice to declare the issue of such Marriagei heretofore contraft ed, to be . The -4QRD CHANbELLOß.'obsetye4,.. in answer ro'wha't falltn' from ..the ;Noble), that _Adultery of . one of the Parties the Marriage,.Contraft was render ea 'mill,: yet, in niallyitig.agitin h second Con ral was to be entered into'.; - bur :it Was'a good -' ule that no 'legal Carittatt'caufd spring out of a Mine. , The Rao, of buRH4,O4 after complimenting the Reverend Prelate (tlie , Ilikop of ROCII.EsrE It) • for the ability with `whiitlc'he- kaiiiiefiVered his s: ntiime`nts; aria panic ula;rly on thelii - yine Liw upon the siiblettsof such Marriages, -said that he had also paid every attenti on to t he injunet 'ion of our Saviour, as became an 'lnterpreter of Divine Late, and that. he was forced co differ.in Opinion from- his Reverend Bicitherin:hisi 'Expo-. sition: He was of opinion that our BlEssed Saviour made no such •prOhibition . Ori •tlie'Parties ! as. had: been asserted, hue iliat 'he kit themar libertrto- maitry or •nat'; 'lle,'ansitli...itk 'n eeit oar. Blessed Saxiour had said, to be 'dn improvement of the Mosaic. Law-; that "lie—laid down the 1 4 4.165aic _Law tixr, airf #ifsexiilanatiOti the.corilintnfiri•driit, lira . -iltat his Wals to: . giyeFelikr . eo ty.-V:ritk4tut saying_ any tiiin&ifepeetinge-011:giviirg:direitions to the -- offending.tar • .-V : ar eliaget congideretLas .what priipt:iety ) '.he woufL a, j.esnild theiriLorit. • ships be called 'on • sort cif , • ,- Lad - -41talit enaarnenk ought .to .be . :'.irell;ci.msideiect e ..- ii,rf -way • The 71;thop of Lefilibeiiir scot; . that tfiv5:640p.,, ; , tioa. of this tiause :frre't***fliAill'enfirerioNors.e , . sen:p.ufnt;i2pot). alieady dc'-ccared,- and they., j•re:crpined . ::itiitteriscl..ki He aeknowleOgeZl would riotgo• to the roAt7o4 ' Ip.would -operate as some . check - - r(r- 016 row iisr• crime of Adultery; : ina . ; : t6O*o the woman .froin' entertaining.-:pkts'peti future-marriage with of her attachment ;.and .he hope'. which in most cases operatectupon: tke - 413L. ► - male mind; for though no lirtitnise .. to rhfs'etecli - - miglit be made - , yeetheexpecilation:ainioit always operated as an equ . iyalent. To impose .5041 restraint, wa., doing.more -service t o the -stuiteX. Morality, than the modern refinement pick,4!c. on: behalf of crimes, of which : A c h447-- • stood the foremost. . And. although ships might not-be able to dd . allithey . tould wis4' they shOuld do what they could, and though they • could not cut .up-this odious crime ot. Adultery by , the rcrotsf still :they might- leave it. a -sort ; hideous trunk.. • • • • Biskot PQC liESTER s;tid, not then enter into the• subject of differe nce •E;e,,, tween a Reveres d Pr6laie .anti. himself; .11-11,4e7; Shiml4 .. sy thit the. 'ogirfirto-:lte ,had preyed : as to our Saviout's'meanitig; when'tipeak6 ing of Adultery, was the -copentrinz serititnetit of the Greek and' Latin .Clitirefies from the time of Chrysostonx down t() , the days of 1A... the ,text .referred to,- he considered tkrr Loft) 'not as ati'Ex'positbr :of the IVltitafe 'hut raibtr ..• as an otaginat...leglsltoi„%rebt9. 1 434 ral'ge. ter its•:Oistine`Perity.- Piet-though , he epi94Tit ift • . Divine Lanve' aS* . r4Ognanif he , tell the li.cend 14eiate-anEl!.their-, 4ord4hips why' he ' .voottld - Ocitt sueli*oar'riaos F.tr; from approving them, yet te.comitiertH4here,.....- wii6 — rrin - oecaslizin . s oh N;(1-iieli . thef*w;'e* e4llli r r• • to make their choice 'or,two.tv,ils, even positive and moral evils, Now. if'. thic..Divine•Law generally_ mi 4 unllerstosti, and _the Law .14,1 f - the 4Land" - -Tag:on tfieside or: would agree t o proie 4 .lhe, riages as.hAd been .alreadv - eritdred into. .71e . Ma r 7 ff, .11 ? ? TA. - tyG,74 . .13t, objeet.was, 'to reduce to solue.eertaiii.y!the Lare , • on this. subjetl, and; tp'-chedi.. a: lAisvhii.X. 4141‘,-, was horridly increasing. Lordships had heard of a difference of sentiMent4 adds suiije and even'from two Rev. , all pointed mit the..proprietv f • Law... From tit: 'examination he. hat•Ll'llat*;'lLlec had found, that for ;50 .yearA . tors degmed 'such 'marriages; the last 96 year's, there been. no:leg:it . siorf whatever. . vresent . 14; now called on to add' One •tn'br... co the I::,rritt.cow,. of - uneertAt Laws.. - kie:sliould be . more Cdtll,..er. if his Clause was rejaaea, that some Noble . rd would move , the-direet, in v erse of the propiisition,, rather :than leave the matter in .the' . prdstiit - sad state of euricertainty.: The.flouseilien divided,-For the. Clause 27 , . • Against it z4.- . —lVlaparity in faiidur oT•the . claus , . • " After some, conversation between the.Pt.r4,?•9 CLARENCEanti',the Marquis of B . e•clrt'‘‘.49li'A M, was settled that the Iteport..-was to be .brought up on that day 'se'unight.--Adjourtied ;;'cl6c)c Ilb LIS E C 04114 i:: 0 ArS'i • . •- THUltqa?ilc,," MAR . C.H 19 . , , • TRlvbeing tbe lased4 bklt•one- for rcetivinr . - Pritete Petitior4;theSi. E A tooU:th":: Chaii.fibotit•to,o•O'4:l6.ck, lot-the tint poit-9t 4 e•sprctitrng privotetm.rsinvs:;;;of vytuck - • thew is a great Eioi to-uu donr;^' ' • w' W • ' A new was or:;creti fQr Downtcn, in the County; of Wi:ts; in - the room bt Sir WaLIAM SCOTT, who ha* acteptuci of thy CAih m iiugdicd4.