The Sun. — London, England, 1832-06-04 00:00:00

i ;`~~ 1 ~~ ~-- 6-t 7 ,/ ((c,/ (%/e't--e //, ~' e"? ARTIFICIAL TEETH, &e. , ------ , i i ----.-- _....... . . . . . . . • ....- IN 1.1. ( ..../ 11 (0111 -.:).'1..A t . / )t w it ..' jam, • ~ , vi.,,s t , ~-. --et---", i ',,t-* ...., if ---- , ,, 0,: 4ft. • .• 7 1 - • s.----„,..- ---, . I '-' ,...._-, ;........„.„ ' , .4i, , , , ,•,..,, .., —,. 4A..%- , ~..- ' .,0 \- 1 , 941 1 ~;--, - /',,,_5 , , /• . --- ,- - _ .-- - - ..:,1 -1 11 ,R, Nc-e- ,# 0 , .t - ';l7 - ',._,„-:.- - 7,,,,0i„.4: , ,,. ~. • ~, ~ k_. '...,••.„,,,,;, 45 1 - / ... l c , )1, 7 ---.. ' ..." ,/ ~ • -`- ...,-.--;.,-. ..., , , , . Attn., LONDON, MONDAY EVENING, JUNE 4, 1832. (No. 12,395.) (PRICE 7D.) THE SCOTCH REFORM BILL. THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON AND SH MR. D. WENIYSS JOBSON, Surgeon Dentist, from Edinburgh, Member of the Roy; College of Surgeons, has the honour of announcing to th Nobility and Gentry that he may be consulted at 184 PICCADILLY. His method of supplying Deficiencies the Teeth will be found to be diffrrent from any hithert practised in London, and admits, in every case, of th Artificial Teeth being kept firmly in position without an: unpleasant pressure on the Gums or injury to the adjoin ing Teeth. All operations on the Teeth performed, an , Irregularities of Children's Teeth completely removed with.- out the least degree of pain. •. The most distinguished Testimonials and Refer ences may be had. N.B. Patients attended at their own residences, if desired 181., Piccadilly, opposite Burlington House. NEW WORK BY THE AUTHOR OF " LAWRIE. TODD." This day was published, in 3 vols. post Bvo. • STA.NLEY BUXTON, or, The School-fellow& "It is well worthy of the author of Lawrie Todd,' and ' The Annals of the Parish.' A novel of very considerable power, and exhibiting a deep knowledge of the human heart, and tact in describing its most recondite workings."—Morning Herald. Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, New Burlington street. COMPLETION OF THE POLAR VOYAGES. Third Edition, in 2 vols. Bvo., including all the nume rous embellishments engraved by Finden, which ap peared in the 4to. Edition, B EECHEY'S VOYAGE of DISCO VERY to the PACIFIC. Undertaken by Order of the British Government. " We know of no officer that ever sailed, who has displayed greater faculties of observation than Captain Beechey."—Black wood 's Magazine. Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, New Burlington street, NEW WORK BY THE AUTHORESS OF " THE DIARY OF AN ENNUYEE." This day was published, in 2 vols. Bvo. MEMOIRS OF FEMALE SOVE REIGNS. By Mrs. JAMESON. " Will be read with pleasure by all who delight in history and the study of human nature."—Cheltenham Chronicle. Written by one of the most elegant of our female writers— full of feeling and fancy—a true enthusiast with a glowing soul." —Blackwood. Henry Culhurn and Richard Bentley, New Butlingtot. street. NEW WORK BY THE AUTHOR OF " BRAMBLE TYE HOUSE, &c. This day were published, in 3 vols. p os t B vo . TALES OF THE EARLY AGES. By the Author of "Brambletye House," &c. These tales present a picture which Claude might hare painted."—Examiner. CA V E N D I S H; Or, THE PATRICIAN AT SEA. Second Edition, 3 vols. " The anecdotes related of the highest personages in the realm, not excepting royalty itself, are of a nature to excite great cu riosity."—Sun. SIR RALPH ESHER. By LEIGH HUNT. 3 vols. " Among the numerous historical personages introduced into this work are :—The Merry Monarch himself— Duchess of Cleveland—Duchess of Richmond—EArl of Clarendon—Duke of Buckingham—Sir Charles Sedley— La Belle Stewart—Cromwell—Nell Gwynn—Lady Cal tlemain, &c. &e. EUGENE ARAM. By the Author of " Pelham," &c. 3 vols. " One of the most capital books of our time."—Morning Chronicle. • THE YOUNGER SON. 3 vols. We believe the celebrated Trelawney (the friend of Lord Byron) to be the author of this work, and that it embodies a considerable portion of the events of his earlier life."—Literary Gazette. T lIE OPER A. By the Author of " Mothers and Daughters." 3 vo l. " Throughout evidence of the skill of a practised writer." Athenwurn. Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, New Burlingtoi street. Just published, in 2 vols. 4t0., with Thirty-One Views, Plans of Towns, Harbours, &c., 2/. 16s. boards, BRITISH DOMINIONS in NORTH AMERICA; or, a Topographical and Statistical Description of Upper and Lower Cinada, New Bruns wick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, and Cape Breton, with Considerations on Land-Granting and Emigration; Statistical Tables, &c. By J. BOUCHETTE, Esq. Su rveyor -General of Lower Canada, Lieut.-Col. C. M. &c. London : Printed for Longman, Rees, Orme, and Co. Of whom may be had, by the same Author, TOPOGRAPICAL DICTIONARY of LOWER CANADA, 4to. 28s. boards. MAPS of the Districts of QUEBEC and THREE RIVERS, of the District of MONTREAL, and of UPPER and LOWER CANADA; 30s. each in sheets; the Set 4 1 1 os, H ETIIERSETT, NEAR THE CITY OF NORWICH. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, By Mr. SPELMAN, On THURSDAY, the 14th day of June, 1832, at Twelve o'clock at noon, at Garraway's Coffee-house, Cornhill, London, ALL th a t VALUABLE FREEHOLD ESTATE, with farm-house, barn, stables, and all requisite agricultural buildings, yards, &c., and several in closures of rroductive Arable and Pasture Land, containing 232 acres, more or less, in a high state of cultivation, situate in the parish of Hethersett, in the county of Norfolk. This Estate consist., of fine corn land, which has been farmed by the proprietor for many years, on the most ap proved system of Norfolk husbandry; it is situated in a fine pert of the county, abounds with game, and forms a most desirable object for investment or occupation. The Estate is admirably arranged, and divided into inclosures by well-raised and thriving fences; bounded by the turnpike-road from Norwich to London, and is dis tant from the former place about five miles. For particulars and conditions of Sale apply at Gar raway's Coffee-house, and Guildhall Tavern, London ; to the Proprietor, T. S. Norgate, Esq. , Hethersett; and to the Auctioneer, Duke's-palace, Norwich. M R. SPELMAN has the honour to an nounce that he is instructed to SELL by AUC TION, on THURSDAY, the I Ith of June, 1832, at Twelve o'clock at noon, at Garraway's Coffee-house, Cornhill, London, the highly desirable and valuable ES TATES situate in Redid, Norfolk, within six miles of city of Norwich. Lot 1. HETHEL HALL, a' substantial and newly erected Mansion, replete with suitable domestic offices, water-closets, deta c h e d l aun dry, and ever conve nience, standing in a tastefully laidout y other Pleasure-ground, and having an extensive a nd luxuriant Park, ornamented with timber and fine old thorns i n front, large and pro ductive Gardens, conveni en tly arranged, having several hun dred yar d s of wall covered with the choicest fruit trees and vines, a melon-ground (walled in), &c. In the Gardens are capacious canals stocked with fish, garden-house, a newly erected dove-house, well stocked_ with pig eons , a circtilar.built lard er , conven i ent l y fitted up, Sic. In a yard at the back of the Mansion are an excellent coach-ho use, granary, two stables with six stalls, loose box, harness-house, &c. The Premises are protected by ornamental and thriving Plantations, in which are extensive walks. Near the Mansion are several ornamental mulberry and walnut trees, and at a suitable distance a Farm-house, barn, stables, y ard, lar ge f orchard, contiguous to which are several in losures oArable and Pasture Land of the most productive quality, which, with the ga r d ens, pleasure-grounds, plan tations, at and 61 the Co Acres of ttot best b ottomed wood land in y, and the site o f b uildings contain 199 Acres, more o u r lee , s, The Estate is surrounded by Covers and Preserves on the adjoining estates, and is celebrated for an abundance of hares, pheasants, partridges and woodcocks. The soil also is peculiarly adapted for the growth of timber, and it is e stimated that there are 30,000 young and other growing Trees upon the Estate. Lot 2. A very desirable FARM, lying contiguous to Lnt 1, in a ring fence, with convenient and substantial brick and tiled Farm-house, specious barn, stables, can died., net-house, granary, piggeries, capital fowl-houses, double cottage, yards, gardens, orchards, &e., containing (altogether, with the site of the buildings, 153 A. 2a. Or., more or lee-) of productive Arable and Pasture Land, in a good state of cultivation, and divided by excellent fences into convenient inclosures. The London Coaches pass daily within two miles from this estate, the roads in the neighbourhood are good, and the poor -rate is very low. Particulars and conditions of sale may be had at Garral eray's Coffee-house, Cornhill; of Messrs. G. T. and IC Taylor, solicitors, 18, Featherstone -buildings, Holborn, London ; Mt sm. Simpson and Son, solicitors, Norwich ; oaelf Mr. Henry Calver, land agent and surveyor, Disc; of the Auctioneer, Norwich. LIST OF T. OF 166 WHO VOTED AGAI TION FOR ADDING Ml COUNTIES OF SCOTLA: ENGLAND. Adeane, H. J.—Cambridgesh. Althorp, Vis.—Northamptonsh. Anson, Sir G.—Lichfield Anson, Hon. G.—Gt.Yarmouth Baillie, J. E.—Bristol Barham, J.—Stockbridge Baring, F. T.—Portsmouth Barnett, C. J.—Maidstone Blamire, \V.—Cumberland Blunt, Sir C.—Lewes Ilonverie, Hon. P.—Downton Briscoe, J. L—Surrey Brougham,-J.—Winchilsca Brougham, W. -.Southwark Burton, Henry—Beverley Byng, Sir John—Poole BviitT, Geo.—Middlesex Calvert, N.—Hertfordshire Campbell, J.— Statibrd Carter, J. B.—Portsmouth Cavendish, Ld. G.—Derbyshire Cavendish, C. C.—Yarmouth, Isle of Wight Chaytor, Sir W. I:.—Durham Chichester, J. P. B.—Barnstaple Clayton, Col.—Marlow. Creevey, T.—Downton Curteis, H. B.—Sussex Denman, Sir T—Nottinghamsh. Duncombe, T. S.—Hertford Dundas, Sir R. L—Richmond Dundas, J. C.—Richmond Dundas, T.—York Ellice, K—Coventry Evans, W.—Leicester Evans, W. B —Leominster Ewart, \V.—Liverpool Fazakerley, J. N.—Peterboro' Fergusson, Sir IL—Nottingham Foley, T. H.—Worcestershire Foley, J. H. H.—Droitwich Folkes, Sir W.—Norfolk Fox, Lieut.-Col.—Calne Gisborne, T.—Stafford Graham, SirJ. R. G.—Cumberl. Grant, Right Hon. R.—Norwich Grosvenor, Lord It Handley, W. F.—Newark Hawkins, J. H.—Tavistock Heron, Sir R.—Peterborough Heywood, B.—Lancashire Hobhouse, Sir J. C.—Westmin. Hodges, T. L—Kent Home, Sir W.—Newtown Hoskins, K.—Herefordshire Howard, P. H.—Carlisle Hughes, Colonel—Grantham Hughes, Ald. W. H.—Oxford. Hume, Joseph—Middlesex Ingilby, Sir W.—Lincolnshire James, W.—Carlisle Jeruingham, H. V.—Pontefract Johnstone, SirJ. B.—Yorkshire Jones, J.—Carmarthen King, E. B.—Warwick Knight, R.—Wallingford Lefevre, C. S.—Hampshire Leigh, T. C.—Wallingford Lemon, Sir C.—Cornwall Lennox, Lord A.—Chichester Lennox, Lord J. G.—Sussex Lennox, Lerd W.—Kin,g'sLyzin Lester, B. L.—Poole Littleton, K J.—Staffordshire Lumley, J. S.—Nottinghamsh. Moberly, W. L. Shaftesbury Macauley, T. B.—Caine Maddox, J. F.—Chester Macdonald, Sir J.—Hampshire Mangles, J.—Guildford hlarjoribanks, S.—Hythe Marshall, W.—Beverley Milbank, M.—Camelford Milton, Visc.—Northamptonsh. Morpeth, Viscount—Yorkshire. Morrison, J.—lpswich, North, F.—Hastings Norton, C. F.—Guildford Ord, W.—Morpeth Paget, T.—Leicestershire Palmer, C. F.—Reading Pendarves, E. W.—Cornwall LIST OF MEMBERS WHO 1 MURRAY' Atherley, A.—Southampton Brabazon, Visc.—Dublin Co. Buxton, T. F.—Weymouth, &c. Cavendish, H. F. C.—Derby Cradock S —Cameltbrd Crampto'n,P.C.—MilbournePort Davies, Colonel—Worcester Ebrington, Visc.—Devonshire Heneage, G. F.—Lincoln Knight, H. G.—Malton Labouchere, H.—Taunton Lamb, G.—Dungarvon Mayhew, W.—Colchester Nugent, Lord—Aylesbury LIST OF THOSE WHO II; MAJESTY'S MINISTERS, THEM. Dixon, J.—Glasgow, &c. Fergusson, R. C.—Kircudbright French, A.—Roscommon Co. Hodgson, J.—Newcastle-on-Ty. DURING LAST WEEK. Wheat. Barley. COUNTRY CORN MARKETS Per Quarter. Carlisle Hexham Ntorpeth Pcnrith Sheffield Winchester Per Bushel. Carmarthen Coventry Newcastle (Staff.) Northallerton Swansea Warwick s. to s. s. to s. 62 32 60 70 36 42 60 66 32 34 - 64 34 - 65 40 56 64 132 35 s.d. s.d. s.d. s.d. 66 7 3 3 6 40 X7O 9 0 4 8 54 94 98 64 66 70 93 36 46 98 99 56 60 74 80 52 46 90 10 0, 4 6 50 1 14 6 18 0' 9 0 10 0 150 176 90 106 160 180 90 106 159 170 96 100 S. to S. 22 22 27 23 25 24 Y $. 41 - 32 36 122 24 d. 18 20 36 40 36 39 33 40 38 47 2",:2 2 6 22 2 6 , 41 42 46 s. d. s. d. 00 0 0 56 60 53 56 5 6 6 0 6 2 6 6 00 00 73 76 Per 8011. Barnardcastle Durham Richmond Stockton, 54 66 50 76 50 70 50 70 00 110 96 110 80 100 00 00 WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET.-June 1. Wheat, Red, Norfolk and Suffblk -8. 548. to 595. fine 633. Lin. and Cani. ......... -s 535. to 595. fine 625. - Yorkshire .... . ........•....s. 565. to 595. fine 02s. White ............................. -s. 565. to 625. fine 665. ----- Foreign, Red ................... -5. 48s. to 535. fine 595. Barley, White -s. -s. to -s. fine ti4s. Nerfolk and Suffolk ................ 305. to 335. fin e 365. --- Lincolnshire 3 45. to 365. fine 395. Yorkshire Wold 3ss. to 38s. fine 395. Beans, Small --- Foreign -s. to -s. fine -s. 335. to 355. fine 38s. ---- Tick 325. to 345. fine 35s Oats, Potato 22s. to 255. fine 265. -- Poland -s. 20s. to 245. fine 255. Friezland and Small -s. 17s. to 225. fine 245. Mealing lNd. to 12 1 , 1 4 d. per Stone. Shelling 26s. to 9.95. Od. per Load. Malt 32s. 425. fine 455. per Load. Rapeseed. 2ll. Os. 24/. Os. 25/. 10s. per Last. SCOTCII MARKETS. Wheat. Barley Aberdeen Berwick Coldstream Cupar Dundee Elgin 50 58 46 50 45 48 60 68 51, 70 60 62 57 60 46 50 40 45 CO 68 of the ra Oats. 1 Beans. 23 •29 24 23 26 30 34 32 35 28 30 30 32 24 26 27 39 30 34 isure va Inverness«—... Kelso Perth . 11:7- The size EDINBU Wheat. First 74s Od Second fiSs Od Third 62s Od 19 22 15 17 15 18 20 `.1.1 24 27 18 21 20 24 17 18 25 32 24 27 ies throng lOatinoaL Beef, per lb. Mutton, Veal Pork.. Lamb, per qr. Fallow, cwt....: Quartern Loaf Potatoes. 171 lb. 22 24 n 25 26 29 26 30 23 30 23 30 23 24 45 48 26 30 hout the 30 31 35 38 48 - 43 44 :swan. GU CORN MARKET.--May:3o. Barley. Oats.; Pease. Beans. 34s 6d 28s Od 3(is Od 36s Od 34s Od 25s Od 34s Od 34s Od —s Od 228 Od 32s Od 132 s Od PRICES OF PROVISIONS, &E. Oa. 3d. to Os. 6d. Fresh Butter, lb. s. 10d. to Is. 241 0 4 0 6 Salt Ditto—. 0 9 010 0 3 0 9 Ditto, per cut. 084 90 0 0 4 0 6 Egs, per 3 0 4 0 Oa g tStraw(kpl. z )l4 0 14 6 15 0 37 6 Wheat Ditto-14 0 14 6 0 0 0 9 Barley Ditto ..13 (I 13 6 0 3 0 0 Hay, per st.-- 1 1 1 2 EDINBURGH MEA There was a large supply of Oai met a quick sale; prices continua Per Sack of 2801 b. Imp. First Oatmeal Second ditto 1 16 0 Barleymeal 1 13 0 Peasena eal 1 6 0 Pot Barley—No. 1, per cwt. 13s GLASGOW CORN Wheat, per 9.401 b. s. d. s. d. British, old 25 0 to 30 0 new 27 0 30 0 Canada, free ..... 27 0 29 0 Irish Barley, per 3201 b. English 0 C Scottish 27 0 28 6 Irish L MARKET.-May itmeal at this day's market, Which le the same. Per Stone of 141 b. Imp. First Oatmeal £0 2 0 Second ditto 0 1 10 Barleysneal 0 1 8 Peasemeal .--2 d, 155.-3 d, 2 0s.—Peall 246 MARKET.—May 30. Oats, per 2641 n. s. d. s. d. Irish l6 0 to 18 3 British — 0 0 Beans, per 2601 b. English Scottish Pease, Scottish Oatmeal, per 1401 b l5 0 17 0 Flour, per 2801 b 46 0 48 0 CORNWALL, MARKET. Tito/to—Wheat (average) ‘ , s.l.—Barley, 12s. 3d.—Oats, 9s. 3d. ST. AusTeu.—Wheat, —s. to 'is.—Barley,—s. to 12s.—Oats, O. to ps. Od. BODMIN—Wheat (average) 245. Od.—Barley, 11 s. Od. — Oats, Ss HELsTori—Wheat, 255. Od.—Barley, 13s. Od. Sr. Commis—Wheat, 235. to 23s.—Barley, lls. to 12,—Beel, and Mutton, sd. to 6d.—Veal, Od.—Lamh. Od. PENZANCE—Wheat, 245. to 25s.—Barley, —s. to 12s.—Oats Os. to 10s. Od.—Beef and Mutton, sd:to 61—Pork, Od. to Butter, gd. per lb. LINKE/MD....Wheat, to 225. Od.—Barley, 1 ls. Od.—'Oats, Os. to Bs. Od. LAUNCESTON—Wheat (average) 225. 6d.—Barley, I Is. o,l.—Oats, 85. Od.—Beef, 6d.—Mutton, 6d. rE MAJORITY INST SIR G. MURRAY'S Mc EMBERS TO THE LARGI Penleaze, J. S.—Southampton Petro, E.—llehester Phillips, C. M.—Leicestershire Philips, G. R.—Steyning Poyntz ' W. S.—Ashb ur t on Rider, T.—Kent Ridley, Sir M. W.—Newcastle upon-Tyne Robinson, Sir G.—Northampton ilooper, J. B.—Huntingdonshire ; Russell, Lord J.—Devonshire Russell, Lord W.—Tavistock Russell, C.—Reading Sanford, E. A.—Somersetshire Schonswar, Scott, Sir E. D.—Lichfield Sebright, Sir J.—Hertfordshire Slaney, It. A.—Shrewsbury Smith, J.—Buckinghamshire Smith, J. A.—Chichester Smith, R. V.—Northampton Stanley, Lord—Lancashire Stanley, E. G. S.—Windsor Stephenson, H. F.—Westbury Stewart, P. M.—Lancaster Strickland, G.—Yorkshire Strutf, E.—Derby Stuart, Lord D. C.—Arundel Stuart, Lord P. J.—Cardiff' Talbot, C. It.—Glamorganshirc Thicknesse, R.—Wigan Thompson, Alderman—London Throckmorton, R.—Berkshire Tomes, J.—Warwick Townley, R. G.—Cambridgesh. Tracy, Charles—Tewkesbury Venables, Ald.—London Vere, J. H.—Newport, I. of W Vernon, G. J.—Derbyshire Villiers, T. H.—Bletchingly Wason, W. R.—lpswich Wellesley, W. I'. L.—Essex Whitmore, W.—Bridgenorth Wilbraham, G.—Cheshire Willis, J.—Boston Williams, Sir J. H.—Carmarth. Williams, W.—Monmouthshire Wood, John—Preston Wood, Alderman—London Wrightson, W. B.—Hull Wrottesley, Sir J.—Statfunish. SCOTLAND. Adam, C.—Kinross, &c. Agnew, Sir A.—Wigtonshire Ferguson, R.—Dysart, &e. (Anon, W. D.—Selkirk, &c. Grant, Rt. Hon. C.—lnverness shire nalibttrton, Hon.—Forfarshire Jeffrey, Rt. Hon. F.—Perth, &c. Johnston, A.—Crail, Johnston, I—lnverkeithing Johnstone, J. J. H.—Dtnnfries shire Loch, J —Tain, &c. Mackenzie, J. A. S.—Ross-shire M'Leod, R.—Sutherlandshire Morrison, John—Banffshire ( Sinclair, G., jun.—Caithness-sh, Stewart, Sir M. S.—Renfrew•sh. IRELAND. Acheson, Lord—Co. of Armagh Belfast, Earl of—Co. of Antrim Brown; J.—Co. of Mayo Browne, D.—Co. of Mayo Burke, Sir J.--Galway Co. Chichester, Sir A.—Belfast Duneannon, Wis.—Kilkenny Co. Killeen, Lord—Co. of Meath King, R.—County of Cork Knox, Col.—Dungannon Oxmantown, Lord—King's Co. Ponsonby, G.—Youghall !Power, R.—Waterford County Rice, Re. Hon. 'l'. S.—Limerick Russell, J.—Kinsale , Walker, C. A.—Wexford I Westenra, H.—Monaghan Co. White, Col. /1 —Dublin Co. White, S.—Co. of Leitrim TELLER. !Kennedy, T. F.—Rothsay, 'AIRED AGAINST SIR GEO. S MOTION. Ossory, Earl of—Kilkenny Co. Parnell, Sir H. B.—Queen's Co. Paget, Sir C.—Caernarvon Pelham, C. A.—Lincolnshire Ponsonby, Hon. J.—Higham, Ferrers Price, Sir R.—Herefordshire Rumbold, C. E.—G. Yarmouth Stanley, E J —Hindon Thomson, Rt. H on. C. P.—Dover Tvnte, C. K. K.—Bridgewater Western, C. C.—Essex Villiams, John, Winehelsea Wood, C.—Wareh am USUALLY VOTE WITH HIS , WHO VOTED AGAINST O'Farrell, R. M.—Co. of Kildare Ross, H.—Aberdeen, &c. Sheil, R. L.—Co. o f Louth Wyse, T., jun.—Tipperary Co. Beans. Oats. ROBERT PEEL. (From the Morning Chronicle of Friday and Saturday.) The " Pitt Club Triennial Meeting," t 1 last dying speech and confession of the Tories Oligarchists, and Corruptionists, was held or Tuesday last ; and the funeral obsequie. , celebrated of " the Pilot who weathered tin storm." If, as the Duke of Wellington and the Conservatives assert, the Reform Bill will work a Revolution and rout 'out the princi ples of' Toryism, this disgusting exhibition of burnt-out prejudice and extinct party-feeling will be the last scene in the farce of Toryism. In a few months we predict that the Pitt Clubs will die a natural death. The report of this Beelze bub Dinner, ?dramatically dressed up by the Anti--Reform Journals, is pompously put for ward as a grand expiring effort of the Ultra- Tories. An analysis of the persons present will sufficiently expose the ludicrous imposture, and we recommend the Anti-Reformers, on another occasion, to suppress names. The din ner was attended by JO:1r Dukes—Wellington, Buccleuch, Beaufort, Rutland ; by /bur Mar quesses—Salisbury, Abercorn, Londonderry, and Camden ; by eleven Earls ; Lord Eldon, the only notorious nobleman ; by eight Barons, Vis counts, and courtesy Lords ; by Colonel Sib thorpe, and twenty-one Members of Parliament only ; and by about two dozen of London mer chants, enriched by Pitt Jobs and the " Sys tem !" Particulars always expose the Tories ; hence their partiality fir " hole and corner meetings." They are creatures that cannot bear the light ; the intellect and public spirit of their countrymen they sedulously and shrewdly avoid. We assert, without risk of contradiction, that no public man was present possessing any political or personal influence in the country, the Duke of Wellington excepted ! And these are the Or gies—" the frantic revels of Bacchus"— which the Conservatives delude themselves will uphold their sinking cause, and impose on the enlight ened and liberalized people of Great Britain and Ireland ! Sir Robert Peel and all the " half and-half" friends of "the illustrious Chairman." very discreetly absented themselves. Even Lord Lyndhurst and Lord Ellenborough were missing. Thus, while seven Tory Peers only were attend ing the remains of Schedule A and B to the tomb of the Capulets, a frenzied few were paying their last sad tribute and superstitious devotions at the shrine of William Pitt. To criti cise the proceedings of the dinner in the speeches or toasts would be absurd. The Duke of Welling ton, the " illustrious Chairman" of the Orgies, found it convenient to avoid all reference to the present questions ; and the utter contempt of public principle, so recently exhibited by his Grace, fully accounts for the absence of all the honest Ultra-Tories (a singular fact), and for shrewd silence on all the topics of public policy and opinion which distinguished the former meetings of the blind buzzards. The ,Standard report states, that " Lord Eldon made a few re marks ; but from the low tone in which the Noble and Venerable Earl spoke, we were un able to catch their purport." Mayhap, that ancient Nobleman gave vent :to some sentiments of commentary on the utter lack of political honesty which had branded the characters of public men of his own party in the month of May, not very palatable, and inconvenient to report. The whole ends and intent of thi s abortive Meeting were probably to raise another idol—" the illustrious Chairman"--on the Pan theon pedestal of " Pitt." It behoves us, there fore, to examine the pretensions of the Duke of Wellington to this pagan elevation. The Tories have always sought to mislead the people in the worship of " golden images ;" but the days ofpolitical idolatryare departed never toreturn. The schoolmaster is abroad, and the scales have fallen from the eyes of the people. Robert Peel was put forward as a " second Pitt ;" the Duke of Wellington was next produced—both pieces have been damned. The times and circum stances for the successful repetition of these po litical dramas are changed. Party nicknames and bladder-blown repute have no credit or power. " Measures, not men," are the test of Cabinets. The old jugglers are exposed ; the Automaton Chess-players cannot attract or de ceceive the country. The quarry of corruption is worked out. The " management of the House of Commons" expired with the paralysis of Lord Liverpool. The Clare election was a sig nal and pregnant occurrence. The Catholic Ques tion did, as predicted, macadamize faction. The Administration of Mr. Canning was the thaw of parties. When the ice-flood once sets in, rapid and overwhelming is the current of-the fluid. The " illustrious Chairman" and his man Friday, Sir R. Peel, could not stay the torrent of events. On the 22d ult. we sketched the character of Sir R. Pecl—a man who had outlived his times —a politician of very ordinary powers ; of no political sagacity—of no moral courage ; with no capability of resisting what he could not oppose ; ever the last to be convinced of a po• litical necessity ; always the mean truckler to measures which if able he would fain avert—a crafty politician, recently willing to await the benefits of political apostasy without the cou rage to run the risk of those to whom he was the " putter up." We painted him as the shuttlecock of a Reformed House of Commons; as the " last man" of an unreformed Parliament, who would assuredly find a low level in a real Legislative Assembly of this great nation. Behind the scenes, during the recent po litical m ono l ogue of the Duke of Wel lington, Pe e l was id prompterwro wrote the to the piecewhich ich "Actor of all Work," a the other attempted to perform. But we will pass on, as we then promised, " to trace the outlines of his Grace's character." We pro nounce the Duke of Wellington, " the illustri ous Chairman" of the Pitt Club Triennial Meeting, a political impostor. We will not do wilful injustice to the private or political cha racter of any public man. With the private reputation and conduct of the Duke of Welling ton, as public Journalists, we have nothing to do ; but these are times when the mask must be torn off front the face of every political actor. What are his Grace's pretensions to administer the affairs of the people of Great Britain and Ireland ? The profession and foreign life of the Duke of Wellington render him utterly unfit for the duties of a British Statesman, in perilous times, requiring a master-mind and extraordinary sagacity, foresight, and judgment. First, the calibre of his mind is notoriously that of medio- 'rite. The outline of his countenance is hard unintellectual, giving no evidence of the impres sions of wisdom and experience. He is cun n j n a, but not acute or profound ; quick in poll deal tactics to discern an ambuscade, but inca pable of anticipating events or looking into poli. rical futurity. Like Monk Duke of Albemarle. his face is no key to his thoughts, " no play of feature"—few words—slow speech—few share his confidence—phlegmatic firmness—" mode rate abilities and less education." Resembling ' . Monk, the Duke of Wellington has displayed an utter and despicable want of political prin ciple. Monk alternately, to satiate his ambition, sided with the Parliament, with Cromwell, with the Rump, with the Cavaliers—pleading neces sity as his cold and hollow excuses. Thus the Duke of Wellington one clay affected—that to be Premier (in 1827) would be an act of lu nacy ; and speedily assumed the reins of Go vernment ! After a lunar month of bitter oppo sition by tongue and pen to Catholic Emancipa tion, he sprung a mine on his party, and with out consultation or concert carried the question of his oldest, most bitter, and recent opposition. Denouncing Lord Grey's Cabinet as anarchists and revolutionists, and their measures as leading to a total disorganization of the Constitution and to Republicanism ; loading the Lords' Journals with insane and idiotic protests, he offers him self up a sacrifice to " his beloved Monarch," to carry the Bills of Reform, which had so lately been the object of his factious and audacious opposition ! And this is the man whom the Conservatives, par excellence, denominate " lustrious !" If political integrity yet exists, what terms of indignation or contempt can por tray such political iniquity ? Can the reputa tion of any man survive such a disgracefhl and scandalous suicide ? Can I\lachiavelian sophis try cloak such a rank imposture ? The Duke of Wellington must be either a mere infant in poll ! tics, or the veriest political charlatan that ever pretended to play the character of a State Empiric. He resembles Monk, of whom it was said on the Restoration, "that he would have the doing of it, or hinder it !" Again, the age of the Duke of Wel lington, coupled with his early and original pre judices, utterly unfits him for the office of a Mi nister and the emergency of the times. He is " a man of the last generation." Bacon observes of antiquated politicians, that " men of age sel dom drive business home to the full period." His Grace is a bed-ridden politician. He has been reared in the school of the feudal aristo cracy ; trained in the exclusive profession of arms ; smothered in foreign diplomacy and the game of Kings ; flattered by fawning sycophants and Royal adulation. George IV.—disso lute, idle and physically indolent—leaned on his public men, and courted the pomp and circum stance of any individuals raised to eminence and party power. On the death of Mr. Canning the Duke of Wellington was the last remaining sub ject of the old political regime. George IV. made him a walking staff, and the Duke became, in fact, a political Dictator. Further, the mili tary pr9fession of his Grace disqualified him as a legislator. Great military commanders have been ever small statesmen. Albemarle, Mar borough, indeed the whole corps of Wellington predecessors, have failed in the character and parts of politicians. Sir George Murray, Sir Henry Hardinge, and all the military subalterns of the Duke, have in like manner exposed their utter incapacity and insignificancy. Lord Sand wich told Pepys that " Marlborough would sink." The same just prediction of the Duke of Wellington was frequently made by men who did not pretend to the gift, of prophecy ; and down he has fallen, never to rise again. Arthur Wellesley was launched into public life a page in Dublin Castle—a hopeful school. At the age of twenty-five he went abroad, in military ser vice. In 1797 he landed in British India, and did not return to Europe till 1807. In 1808 he was again transported to Portugal ; in 1809 appointed Commander-in-Chief in Spain, and continued in the Peninsula till 1814. Till 1816 his Grace may be said to have lived exclusively a foreign life. A soldier, thus ex patriated, must indeed be superhuman if he could have acquired the mind, the knowledge, the ex perience, the habits of a Statesman. Utterly ignorant of the people and the progress of public opinion, he formed and conducted his Ad ministration on principles of stupidity and ig norance. Sir Robert Peel was his menial ser- vant, and was broke on his chariot wheels. Can we wonder at the result ? But it is the warrior character of the Duke of Wellington which at tracts his Monarchs and partisans ; it is his fame, and the overflowing rewards and honours heaped on his " long calculating" head. Verily, the Duke of Wellington, on this score, has a receipt in full. We will not basely detract from his hard and justly-earned repute as a British General. Would to God that he had headed the invincible troops of his country in the cause of nations and of liberty instead of for Kings and despotism ! He - has lived in a few short years to see the political fabric of his mili tary powers prostrated and annihilated, and yet a few years and he will outlive every vestige of his conquests and diplomacy. But what are the British People indebted to this Tory-idiot—to this man, which has not been amply repaid in national tribute and adulation ? Is there no limit to popular gratitude—no possible requital of his services ? Covered with British and foreign honours and titles, with large pecuniary rewards from every quarter of Europe, lie scarcely knows his proper country. Four Peer ages in his family, and many more among his favourites and companions in arms, has he not enough political power without usurping the Dictatorship of the Nation ? He acquired large sums in India ; in 1809 Parliament voted him an annuity of 2,000/. per annum ; in 1812 Par liament again voted him an annual increase of 2,0001. a year ; in the same year 100,0001. was voted to him for the purchase of lands ; in 1814 the fu r th er sum o f 4 0 0 , 0 00 1 . was voted to h i m ; and a f ter t h e b att l e o f W aterloo 200,000 1 . more ! ! ! 'thus, therefore, th e "cash account" of his G race t h e D u k e of Well i ngton w i t h hi s grateful countrymen stands as follows : P ensions out of Consolidated Fund £8,926 C onstable of the Tower 950 238 Colonel of the Rifle Brigade Colonel of the First Foot Guards 2,695 Lord Warden of Cin que P or ts 295 I nterest on Grants by Parliament :35,000 The " Illustrious Chairman" receives, therefore, at least One Thousand Pounds Sterling per Week of public money ! Is this vast and un paralleled pecuniary requital of military services not sufficient without the salary of First Lord of the Treasury for mis-governing us? Tbt honours of Cincinnati's and Washington wen never thus tarnished. Further, the Duke of Wellington, we believe, has large foreign grants and landed possessions in the Netherlands, ii France, in Spain and Portugal, and, for augh! we know, from every Potentate of the Holy Alliance ! If such a man be proof against dr sinister interest of foreign associations and pocket bias it would indeed be marvellous. To more of the past we will not recur. The sun of the Duke of Wellington's political glory is set to rise no more. We will not inquire how ,he was to put down a Nation of Reformers in "ten days-;" what warrants were contemplated against men endeared to the People by great exertions and sacrifices to the public interest ; what Foreign troops might Quix o ti ca lly h ave been thought of, or who were the Grenadier Guards whom his Grace would have selected as his Cabinet Ministers. We will only remark on the singular circumstances, that his last-ac quired lands were " to be holden by him to the Kings of England, at the Castle of Windsor, by a tri-colourcd flag ;" and that the author of the Black Book, months since, concluded a political sketch of his Grace as follows :—" We shall leave the Duke with a fervent prayer, that he will never again be Premier of England ; his ideas and sentiments are wholly alien to the happiness and liberties of Englishmen, and we verily believe that his return to power would be the signal for a general rising throughout the kingdom." We have been induced to illustrate the poli tical characters of the Duke of Wellington and Sir Robert Peel, because those two expiring statesmen are the last hope and refuge of the Tory faction. All men of reflection, able to penetratate into political futurity, and to dis cern the coming changes of parties, and princi ples of Government in this country, must see the utter impossibility of those two public men conducting the difficult affairs of this nation for two successive years. Their political principles are obsolete—their reputation for statesman-like power and consistency of action is utterly gone : abandoned, despised by the Ultra-Tories (the most honest part of their ancient allies,) and confessedly unable to govern a House of Com mons or to satisfy the people, their future dura tion in office—if they should again be so daring as to assume the reins of Government—must be, indeed, short-lived. The two Ex- Ministers have both pronounced that a " strong" Adminis tration—their Administration, of course—is im possible under the amendment of the Representa tion which the country has decreed. If, therefore, as they say, this is certain, we have disinterested testimony that they cannot again hold the helm of public affairs. If they could, however, again repossess themselves of Tory misrule, what must be the hypocrisy or falsehood of their pre sent bitter denunciations of the Reform Bills ? They have both denounced Par liamentary Reform as revolution ; and a revo lution it will, and ought to be, as respects their principles of government. Toryism and its corrupt representation have hitherto bol- stered up every species of abuse. The Muni cipal System, the Church, the Nomination Boroughs, the Debt, the Taxation, the Ex penditure —every thing has been pressed into corrupt service and sinister advantage. By the old machinery they can never again rule ; and their temporary return to office would probably only accelerate those expectant benefits of the Reform measures which it would be their bigoted and stupid object to prevent. They must, as the Saints would say, be" born again," Or become '6 new men," if they again attained executive power. This change of moral and political nature cannot be possible in so old a man and so superannuated a politician as the Duke of Wellington, notwithstanding his Grace turns on his axis with the facility of a swivel gun. Sir Robert Peel also, however willing and supple in rotatory motion, has, neverthe less, in his own estimation, turned so frequently, that any more chamelion changes would leave him a Robinson Crusoe on a desert island.— Nothing can be more truly ridiculous than the recent " false positions" of the Military Duke and his practised Right Hon. Aide-de-Camp; we speak not of other Members of his Staff, because the code of military law requires implicit obedience to the " orders" of a commander. Mini sters are assaulted by their two veritable and con sistent predecessors, because, forsooth, they have yielded to agitation ! On Catholic Emancipa twit the great Captain yielded to agitation. In his recent surrender of opinion, and willingnesss to accept office on the principles of Lord Grey, whom he factiously attempted to undermine, the Duke of Wellington yielded to agitation. After pronouncing daring opinions, that there was no feeling in the public mind in favour of Reform, both these magnificent Statesmen avowed that Reform was an inevitable and ne- cessary concession to the voice of the people— to agitation. And thus calumniating Ministers, and ascribing false motives to their political con duct, they were yet ready and willing to adopt the springs of action which, imputed to the Whig Cabinet, they denounced as infamous and cowardly ! We say they, because no man can separate the palpable conduct of these two humi liated public men. The Duke of Wellington, from his profession and callous feeling, was more daring and open in hig demonstration ; and Sir Robert Peel, though more wary, and, perhaps, more doubtful of success, was as deeply impli cated in the recent plots. A warming-pan-- some (I , lr. Herries may be—would have held the seals of the Home Department till the Right Honourable Baronet attained his majority. Sir Robert Peel would have been profuse, as usual, in professions of sincere opposition to the Duke's plan of Reform ; he would have com manded an army of observation, and conducted the manoeuvres and feints of the Duke's noto rious tactics ; he would have poured forth his crocodile and copious conservative effu sions, and as occasion required, had made a cunning diversion, or covered the retreat of the Commander-in -Chief, as might be deemed most expedient under circumstances.,.. His jus tification of his own mask ; his eulogies on his Grace after the relinquishment of the deep-laid scheme ; his unblushing attempt to re-invest Lord Lyndhurst and Lord Ellenborough with charac ter—all prove that, although Sir Robert Peel had not the courage to execute, yet he was ne vertheless particeps eriminis in planning the intended campaign against the just and over f powering rights of the people. A report of the House of Commons enlightened the public with the knowledge of that peculiar class of offendtrs called " family men :" the booty generally falls into the hands of those who run the least risl;„ Ile bungling explanation of Sir Robert Peel, after the exp'osion of the plot, afforded a t o w proof that guilty men are more frequently col • victed by their own defences, than by their prosecutors. If Sir Robert Peel's " explanatio:," is syllogistically examined, nothing can be mole truly contemptible. If the Duke of Wellington, as his apologist asserted, was justified in his abortive attempt to form a Ministry on the basis of an extensive plan of Reform, what could ex tenuate the political cowardice of the Right Honourable Baronet in refusing his aid to his " Noble Friend ? " IC the Duke was not justified, what must be the detestable na ture of that casuistry in a public man, who unblushingly apologized for the most glaring dis regard of political principle on record in the annals of this or any other nation ? From one of the horns of this dilemma the Right Honour able Baronet cannot be extricated ; and there is now nothing wanting to perfect his versatile and turn-spit reputation, but to repeal his Currency Bill of 1819, and substitute an inconvertible medium in its stead. The Tory party, out of doors, load him with abuse ; the friends of the Duke of Wellington revile Peel as the most un worthy deserter; they are the most disinterested witnesses against the Baronet's consistency and political valour; and he has lost for ever—and he knows it—that grand, essential, and rallying point of party power—moral courage, and con sistency in political action. Re-union with the Ultra-Tories is impossible—the old sore is in curable ; a coalition with the trimming Moderls is equally hopeless, and could not subsist for twelve months ; a juste milieu Administration would beget a movement and ultimately a tri umphant popular party. The Duke has fallen into a bottomless pit from whence the political Satan can never emerge. The Right Honour able Baronet has realized the proverb of " be tween two stools." Both men now stand in the pillory of the people's scorn and contempt ; they are the disorderly characters exposed in the stocks to the infinite satisfaction of all good sub jects, and honest bystanders. And what is the cry against the present Administration as not being "business men," and as " una bl e to conduct the affairs of the country ?" Verily, the Whigs have continued in office all the old civil, diplomatic, and municipal Tories. What Member ofthe present Cabinet will not bear advantageous comparison with the Ex-Wellington Administration ? Wan) are the crack " business men" of his Grace's late coadjutors ? Possibly Miguel, Ferdinand, Ni cholas, and the Grand Turk, are not so much esteemed ; mayhap the Holy Alliance is less thought of, and young France more considered. The pert and vulgar chatter of Mr. Croker may not be replaced, and John Bull may enjoy less spirit and be less in vogue ; may be the " Tame Elephant" is not supplanted by any hairy ani mal, and Mr. Goulbourn's incapacity remains still unrivalled ; peradventure the office of Pre mier is filled by a Noble successor, more en lightened, upright, and consistent than the Duke of Wellington ; and the Home Department may ultimately produce more real and efficient muni cipal Reformers than the administration of the (Treat political Pretender, Sir Robert Peel, lre- land cannot be worse oft' than when Orangeism constituted the sole passport to honours and public emoluments. Legal and Church patro nage may not be so exclusively bestowed on Tory parsons and utterers of " pamphleteering slang." Away, then, with this factious cry, got up like the hootings of " Stop thief!" that the real pick-pockets may get home. The only just indictment against Ministers is, that they have not displaced " the business. men"—the swarm of Tory Diplomatists—the plotting un derlings of office—the corrupt provincial poten tates who clog the operations of Government, calumniate its best purposes, and will ultimately destroy it, if the Augean Stable be not early and thoroughly cleansed' out. ROLLS COURT, JUNE 2. HEALEY V. JAGGER• In this case, of which upon a Rimier occasion we pre sented a detailed account, Mr. PEMBERTON moved this morning for a new trial of an issue which had been directed by the Court to determine the validity of a marriage, and also a question respecting the plaintiff's legitimacy. Geo. Healey devised to his son a freehold interest of from 3001. to 4001. a year, with remainder to his children in case he should marry, and remainder over. This son, while yet under age, was apprenticed to a farmer near St. Alban's, where he became acquainted with a female who was housekeeper to a gentleman in the neighbourhood, and by whom she had been the mother of four children. A quar rel having been in some way occasioned between this indi vidual and her protector, an intimacy was formed be tween her and the minor, which soon after, in 1819, re sulted in their marriage, he being only at the age of eigh teen, and her eldest child being nine years old. In order to avoid the inconvenience of the interference of his rela tions, it was arranged that the marriage should be per formed in London; but the union was hardly consum mated when the parties, within twenty-four hours of their being man and wife, separated. Two or three years af terwards, however, on his attaining majority, Healey being in London, was arrested for a debt of his wife, and some ne gotiations having been set on foot by his friends for the purpose of procuring a regular separation, he, according to the evidence, kept company with her for a few days. Not long afterwards he died, and his wife was delivered of a daughter, who was the plaintiff in the present suit, and claimed under the will of her grandfather to be entitled to her father's income. This, however, was resisted on the ground that the marriage had been invalid, from some in formality in publishing the bans, but chiefly on the ►round that in the circumstances of the parties there could hare been, it was maintained, no such connexion be tween her supposed father and mother as in the eye of the law would establish her legitimacy. At the trial the Jury had found for the plaintiff, and the Court was now moved to grant a new trial, on the plea that the Jury had decided against the weight of evidence.—The application was dismissed. BAIL COURT, Java 2. EARDER V. FIDDLER. In this case, which was not concluded on Saturaii when we went to press, a verdict was returned for th plaintiff to the full amount. By the death of Sir JAMES MACINTOSH, a vacancy has arisen in the representation of Knaresboi ough, and a seat at the Board of Commissioners for India Affairs has also fallen to the patronage of the Ministers. Mr. TIERNEY, many years ago, described the Hon. Com missioners of the Board of Control as having nothing , more to do than to look over the newspapers, and when tired of that to look out of the window. Sir JAMES was in the receipt of 1,2001. from the East India Company, as late Recorder of Bombay. A daughter of Sir JAMES married the present Sir WILLIAM WISEMAN, Bart., who, however, lost his lady in 1522. We understand that the leading country Re .6riners have honourably determined to postpone the grand lay of national rejoicing, till after the Scotch and Reform Bills have received the Royal Assent. This de eision is worthy the truly generous and patriotic character liberties r f t u i leis measureand ri g les for th e i r o ,;a f u t ‘ h e e in peo th p e !e, g w re l a i t o a h n a d v e u s n o e x a s a m g p a e l e i d o u t y r made g h o tr f s. Ref A orm mo sh n a th il whadvieprreocbeaitvileydetihr s anction end ind seal of the Sovgazicsr. Some expedient should then ie devised to fix a time for that simultaneous burst of rational gratitude and joy, i‘hich will th en , we lope, Jury ill party divisions, and ultimately restor e to the count, y he benefits of content and good government. Then, in !eed a British KING will be truly the envy and adinira (ion of the world.—Morning chronicle.