The Sun. — London, England, 1811-02-09 00:00:00

~ I • i;1: f 4, , k c 1 4 iti '' liberation being orilend by the Speaker, the Ser. jean(' I.Vent co:n• ter, win:re be WO5 COhlitled, • and demanded his delivery. This' was r-flised ; and an affray followed, " so that the Berjeant was driven to defend himself with Iris mace of arms, and had the crown thereOf broken.by bearing (wardiog) otr a Airdke, aod iris man stricken down." Doling this brawl, the Sheriffs of London tante thither, to whcm the Serjeaut complaini'd of. ink injury, and f , f • ihi:.LO o..livery trf alto sal bur,ess, ai afol%! ; they t‘earrig - with tin•ir °dicer., in .de little iiccount ciiliar of his wanii iint or of his mes tho Ya ne conietor.uously, with touch proud laugnaiiie, so a$ the S,:rjeaut va forced i'o.retorts ithorit the plisonet. - The' House of Commons itt,attcli.tHety complained' to the Upper House of dill; Co l Vititi . i " who, judging the con ' lefil!,i; be very great, ieferred the pnoislitnent then Of to the oi, 4 er of the Coalitions They ac ordti,gly resolved that their Serjeant sits uld again rectutre of the Sheriffs the del very of their Member, hoot any writ or warrant, " albeit the Lord Chancellor offered to grant a writ, which they retailed,. of a ttar opinitn t kit all command. .meuts and other Aas prdceeding from the nether Hodse were to be done and executed by their Sr.e' . tant,. without wt it, by sitew of his Mace, which was his warrant." The Member WAS deli vered tmon this second application ; and the Sherilfs were afterwards committed to the Tower for the contempt. It was frr this contempt indeed, that the complaint here was made, rather than for the breach of privilege : " And forasmuch as the said Fetters being in exueution upon a cendetnnation of debt, a, d set at large by privi_ege of Path:l6)omi was not by law to be brought again into exeentk)n; and so the party was %it! out retriei y for his debt; as well against him 'as his principal debtor, an Act of P.lrraitient was made to revise the execution of the ..said debt against the , principal debtor, and to !dbl.; charge Ferrets." Here it would have been danger 4 ,ons for the Sheri ff to haye discharged the Member for if the mace We.,e nut good authority, he s:s °it'd have been himself accountabie fer the; ettit. BA hmst-be recolieaed, that in'this . tase, the Nlembeta, was also the King's servant, and „the King claiMed as his prerog Ane the exiftuptioti fruit' theta of all his servants during the sitting of Pai liament ; so that we bad theliJudges here giving their'opintoti but 4 with 'ltalica to the privilege of the House of Cormo mons and the prerogative .of the King. In the same) , Parliament occurred the case of `frewytniard, which would be found iii t Hatseli, p. :A. upon -a judg; ment. agaitisi Trewyttuard, a writ of ev e ;ent in out law ry was awarded ; upon which he soriendered 'himself to the Sherif'', who let hitn go upon the ..King's writ of pri% liege of Pirliameto. Upon argu-', it g this' (WC on a demurrer to the Sheriff's plea of • the' writ of privilege, iti an action biungt t against him fur the escape, Dyer iaitt 'that kvtrets ought to have hail his pri i y„,;.-ge," and that Trewynnard was discharged fro:n his ext:cutioti only for t, certain time. cussion or the decision confined exclusively to them.' helves.. It was argued in ,the Exchequer . Chamber before all the Justices- of 4egland; and by •thiir advice the Count of Common Pleas gave a decision in' favour of the anion. He here quoted another case of a double return, where a jedgm ent w as git en, which was, after the Revolution, invalidated by the whole Parliament. In the case of, Maidleti.n and Wynne, the iljdges gave ;heir • opinion, -,that an notion tor:it. talse return should lie at common lOW ; but that the act must be brought 'withal tt.t 0 years of such, false or, double lei urn. 4 prok tit was issued against the dectsiott of the House - 04 Cotturions ben% final. in W, solihister Hall, heeausit they had not the power to impose an oath". and, cif course, the evideoeo could tint be considered either as complete or couclus've. The: case of Ashby and While would chew of, itself that. an adion Cotild lie '4l cemioon law. It. • was au aliuu on the case agaiust a returning officer. Chief Justice Holt held that the acticio was maintainable, Dud he held Eit) against the opposed opinions of the other three Judges of his Court. The case went up to the Uoutie of Lord!, and alter a long discussion, the judgment of the King's Bench, which had been given agaiust opinion, was reversed by a de cision of .50 to 16 ; and it . was there decided that the aCtiou lay. The Commons were at this decision very meld) discontented, :hut.. still it was then considered.as law, and had net been controvert ed ever since that period. 'After that a case was proposed .in. the Court of king's Beech, but Lord Chief Justice' Maoshald persisted irt refusing to. hear any argument whatever on the subjea, uolest a. difference could be.bliewt) between it and the:case of Ashby and White, which, axilie said, had been already decided by the House' of Lords. He also (looted the case of Fos v. Corbett, the High Kttt litf of Westminster, brought against him tor going en with the scrutiny; at the time when be should have made his return of the writ. Lord 14.1.Esatosouott.—That .case is not re ported. Mr. lismaovo. ! ---I believe it is not, or I shauld be likely to liaVV, found it. • Mr. Justice BAY Liot.---.l,Vhat Was the result ? Mr. lioLiwYn.—There Was -a verdict for the plaintiff for 2000 i.. damages. The defendant had protracted the scrutiny above three weeks alter he ho . e rLturned ihe writ. now was come to :mother deers of cases—he wale those of HateaveCorpus. They were few in !twitter, and he did. not consider that they governed the pterot case, The first ease was that or Shaftes bury ; it , was to be. found in the 1g Modern Re ports, 144 ; and altio in the State *Vitals, ties. He had been committed for contempt ;, and on ahe re . turn of the Helical Corpus, the dt-cisiun took on the, priuciple that the contempt wasn't!, finite was also on tile principle of an ha:I4HW judgment, 01141 nut directly ,as an +labor. Carpus. He would put a Cii*e UO this ,sui)jedir-suppose an action was brought in the Court of Common Pleas, and that the party was brought up into the King:* Bench on an Habeas Corpus, surely the haug's Bench would not discharge bin, but would order him ba, k to the Court. which had cummitted him. Unless the Bench did this, what would the cuosequeuce bt ? Why, no writ of error could he, and a coil:Av:tit struggle, Without ,4 decision, must take place be tween the tWo Courts. The COURT --What was the decision in the case of Shaticebury ? Mi. Hoeuovn.—The Parliament Was sitting at the time, mid so tie was trot discharged, as it was the !same Session in which. be I l iad been committed. He 'intended to,aigue these Ca3itS just as .it the Ha.. • beas Corpus Ad was .not in existence. Heairgned 'heat ou the broad principle, that if one court chute to overthrow another 's jurisdietiun, and that on a print e here no erit Of error could he, it, could only induce a ItOittetiri str u, gle between them. Mr. I-loesovb ,then,proceeded to consider the "Speaker's warraet, of commitment in the preseat ease. lie submitted, that'every warrant or corn initial must hate the averment on which - it is ,preiale,tly set out; there must be ,no d e f e c t or error, tlierwise, an attion for fake imprisoe meet was tnaititataable. In such a case, every subiea ag grieved had a right to appeal to the laws; I,oFuships had clearly is jiirisdret ion, and , couki take cogniz awe of the action. J. justification of the warrapt was, that there Was a resolution of the fouse . ef C0011))011S to the following effete name ly, that Sir Francis Burdett bad admitted that a 1011(r was printed by his authority, which letter was a . and, scandalous paper, , raleding upon the proeeedioga ut the,House, and that Su Francis 'Burdett had thereby been guilty of a breach of the privileges oft he House. Mr. Hoiroyd submit ted, that there, was-net sufficient stated here to strew that there really was a breach o f p r i v il ege; and as, tbe . warrant , ran in the. same form with the resolutions, therefore an ae,lon for false impritun went was maintainable. If the warrant issued by the Speaker was not a legal warrant, then he was answerable in the saute manner as a Magistrate who issued a defective or illegal warrant, against whom an_ valor) would lie for ao doing. The warrant stated, " that Sir ; Francis Burdett had admitted a certain letter and argument to be printed by his Au thority, which letter and argument are called it a liballoua and scandalous paper." Now a libel,. as !kW, was no breach of the privilege of the House iii Cemmons. lie submitted, that there must be Oething more stated, : to make it . come older that nomination. Libels upon Parliament had been pften prosecuted in. the Courts below; and when a paper. was said to be libellous of the procuedings''of the House,. it Aid not immediately follow that it Was a breach of privilege. So ; far, their, the war. rant was defeetive. But, in the next place,` a libel; tube an offence At all, must be stated to have been published.: was not enough that it was written or printed ; the mere printing was not a groend; of action for libel, for a man might print what he did not wean to publish , . ,Now it did not appear on the face .of the warrant that the paper in question was published at all, but met ely printed ; the woi& were, that " Sir Francis ,Burdett had admitted a Certain letter, and the accompaitying paper, to be, The Learned Counsel then quoted a case from Mr. Pryon, 441 t Register, which occurred , in the 16th ot Charles If. It originated on toe will of the Earl of Essex, which was to be tried before the de legates,. The Theo Earl of I..ssex..as a Peer of the realm, -detnandedliS a Privilege of Parliament, the, suspension of the seotence for 40 days previ -us to the „sitting of Parliament. Judges • did not agree to this, and t heyrooreaver tame to a resolo tion not to proceetton the totes of 'either' Hone in cas , a of ivi iege, but to deft, to the known laws and customs of the reJlin-:.to their oaths laid the -trust reposed in rtem., They hiso del vered ju 'gritent, ant decided it to be no 'breach 'of ptivilege.- A. :le rtial of ptiVilege also took' pl ice in - tre LaSe of :Eve lyn, where d s as` also decidi d, that., hey should not. be uoutuf by the resolutions ot 'either . I"lotnie ; and Where $ Carle Wai cited to hheAr, thatif a Cilt:se went .out of the COolltroll ' Pleas to the Lords, and if the' Dods decided 41044 to (musts a -chltibt r t the , deeigion in the tninda &dile Court, it might go Wei( a t tain to , ltc ruled by 111. e: COWL • His rfrxt case it'a4 LA of the King t;. Knowles, in ed•Chall,lhni, 'an indicAtnent wa, drawn op at ' Hall against - KnOwies: for trinttler. Knowles • &acted that- he iwas the , Fearf 83nhury by descent', land put 'in a 4 .replication, which rephontiott it till 'd tOihe 'bad. .The, Lords-di.allowcd the file, by &scent. He quoted these erlseS to show t n cotme A 4114 had, to law to confirm the pi iVilegcs halitiMetit , -i•;4l4tit those only were allowed to be pritileges-whichlweie claimed tiyithe whole body; and not 'by ont Hotise .---that the ussge of one Boos;- - kas to'lay the- !nat ter COMphOIICd, befOre the other, so t h at it be clime an. Att of Parliament. Lord Et.t..eNtleacietili.—Mr. Holroyd ; surely the ' s cl..led of the two Houses, without the consent oldie Kiug, is not 'an Act -of Parharneot. Mr. HOLUM).—An apidication was always made to the King„to make it au A& of Parliament. Lord. Et.hestaoxotion.----Then, ot course., it be came irref:agable authority. Mr. flohrtovo.--Alwdys before the case of r rnrK K!tie, was petiiiened on the subjeet as a matter, -tot of grace, hut of-right. The tither con to be drawn liikm those cases was, that the ,„1 11 tg. , bad e- right , to .determi:ie all cartes which CattlO hetwO them as- to the breach ot privilege, ex ce=pt when th"y were assemh;ed in Parliament, end, cd course, part i es io Ate - 04. t and dUermination. They might:win:lr ist Parlianient itself, deliver their o; , inton otohesul, , jett ; bat when they Wert* in their own Coorni, (.;,m.!nelor'e them; they Wight decides an d udjudp, b“d iio/11C e ISO tO cite' rop e eoa g , false- and double returns, and as to the' refusal :of 80 t ri ,, Alt these cuts' s- went to show - the 41,0311)e -.tency -of, the Courts of Law to :take cognizance of ihese subjttts even though they especially apper. L i pe c d to the : Houses of •Parliament.' Tne result wt tilts stiew. that they might take Cognizance •of ,tin in in rho way ()Eamon, and to an' extent, also, which would 'comprehend the-present case. The Case f N viro Stroutie was a case of a false m u m, t oo the Reporiersald had often been argued toe -King's Bench, but was niterwards adjobrtr oil to Pal hatneric l i t was by Parliament itself re- , tiLlictk, to the-Exchequer Chamber, 30 that this %cry art shoal .d that - Paritaineut did not consider the disc ► prinied by MS al*thOelly." There was another de fect in the warrant,' t hat it did not say precisely upon whom the libel was written. The words were-•- a libellous and scandalous paper, refleaing on ~ the proceedings of the House." • It did not ,specir• on what House of Parliament 'whether on tbetords or Commons. But, besides, the weird ce retied ing " was:very inadequate and insufficient on such an occasion. That word might be used either hi p geodror a bad sense, and indeed was often so ; and many books had' contained' reflettions on indivi a (hada and nedies ot-meti, which were‘by no manna meant or intended to be injutiotee The word "'re tie:Aug," ust-d simply by itself," did not import that the reflections were scandalous or libellous. Lord EI.LII/11101101,641.—Cerulinly not. There could be no °erasion to argue that point. There could be no doubt that, the meaning might have been better exi-resled. But was not the intent sufficieetiy manifest ia a reasonable and common manner i - • .• Mr. Ifouloyu . stihmitted that in legrd: proceed ings of a penal nature, it was • not Sufficient to ga ther the intent frorn the general scope of the words but they must be set out in the most t rc eise manner, so as to be incapable of any other meaning, Upon the whole, he had only to add, that if a committal might be made tor contempt by a particular body; and there •was ttoLvet ion so lie, then there could 'bO no remedy for any abuse that mighebe miide.. But if, on the other nand, an action did lie, then 'the whole miget•De eventually brought before, the per House, the higheil Court. of Judidattire„ who would be a check •on the proceedings of tie Other Beaten .ofolie Legislature. The aish'Coastitu lion was ,a syStem e,t cht-cks 'and b,slance•,. nod this might be one that was not of-least itnl ortarice. '['tie present case was on'e rather of a novel nature, as well as of public ieterest, 'and then tore he had en, rod into it at very considerable letigth. ha.j How, to enticat the indoigence of the Court kr y ing occupied bo it .ch ui their time. 'rite ouNea-Gaxattaaa—Mr. Hoirot d nt)! touched neon that pats of the case as r lO 111 breakin g et (loom It wOuld probably save ttoine terinptime to the. eel l:,•„ if he , at inesetit delivered' what he to say et) -that point. • Mr, klotatoin' bag:Aed paidna of their Lordships tor having ovetlooki,d antidst 'the ionitipiicity of arguments iliac lire--aed Mind; It %anti - a common wade?, true a tyina„ that every English ' man's hoeae %acids castle, 'I lie l.tw gave no privilege to break open the autear door of . a house, Lilt for te-, Jetty, as: a here the :King %vita a pal ty. appearedi from tadechion of the Court in the Kith of where it e ~,.said, that fir debt or trespaSi none . Can break the house, but only tor felony." There was a simaar decision in ,:Sernayne'a case, 5 Coke where it' Wai,Sind, that Oh: liberty of a f ()NW doeS-noi stand againstahe King. :These castaAventto prove, hat the: door could nothe broken for cibt - or tre•pasg; e% en by. the King's writ;: but only in cases'. of felony, Where • the writ' was nun orniltas prepte aliquOmulibertairm Nay, it appeared trout, 4 . C6kes Lout: to have been e . lt.tll the •law. then, though altered since, that no • magistrate in ease of - Wetly could break open tha dour on barE surmise;, but that •it was' nere-,sary, that the.peison whom he was ,ira pirsilit of should have been indiOrd, or a ,trne bill: found against him by. the Grand Jury. Lord Coke' says, expressly, " it was against Magna Charta for justices to break open houses ,on surrnisee.' 8 ' subinitred, teat there was. •n o . one' ease on `record, o f t h e door bvieg broken :open hot tor • softie crime, and by process in the name of the King for that crime.' It- could not, be broken open for a libel, nor fur a breach of the peaer, against ,an individual, or a particular body ; bu t ooly torerimes against the Siate:or the kingdom at' large.. Th e teaaoe of this was eVittellt ; it) the Use of a breach el the peace, agairesv a particular per4ue, no mischief., ceeald come to that person, if the aggressor - :shut himself up in his house; hot not se; a the crime was against the whole land.' No one c.!a",e had occurred of breakieg into a titan's hotter tor libel' .or , breach of privilege ; it was coiar qty to 11) in On law, and therefore the athen on •that gioutid was .maintainable. Mr, Hoettoin here concluded his argument. Lord 4 1 .-IyENLIOHOUGII /Uptight it • would 'not be conVenion for the Court to .hear: the Attorney-Ga. aural in reply., The farther hearing was . therefore 1 , postponed. BIS 1-101) OF :LONDON'S cotißT, DOCTORS' COMMONS, Ftit: 8. COI v. GOODDAY. This was a suit ,promoted by Miss Hannah Cox, of time parish of: Terling,, in the county of Essex, against the Rev. Wm. Goodday, Vicar of the said parish, for chiding and brawling in Ow said Church. It appeared, that on a Sabbath day, .during Divine Service, the Rev. Win. Gu°dila), addressed Mks Om - to the:l6llo*h% etre& Miss Cox,, 1 live observed the most indecent behaviour hem you in this Church from time. to time, and ,if : you cannot behave better I will order the .sexton to turn you' out. I have represented you to the litshop„ anti it that will not do, I will put you into the Spl,rittl3l Court." - This day the Rev. 'Wm. Goodday appeartql per sonally in the Court (having by his an,..veti ted the - fads alleged in th e artjele,),; n the Learned Judge (Sir Win. Scott) delivuteil mid able admonition, in which heOblerved, tii.a the It.v. Gentleman had been betrayed 11110 an sift of . itotN credos), net; it sesned, by any criminal by inteinperate 7,0,0 ; btit.addtd, lie &mist, el pantie +Alit) mite S,atine, decree Mini to be suipvii(l, d one fortnight,' to commence Amin ;1114 ii y, and condemn him in Costs; but in consiLie,;m on 01 his personal attetldaMe; be 0941 not diteitt the seu• ,truce to be published in the Church. Fliday next, the Whoti, of the State Lottety will be drawn . . l'iektia' and Sit,tros are on Sakt RICOARDS6IO (ioonl.tiCK, Ht)( ) Co. at lbeir-Odicts, Corner ofßalik and lacing the kin 'a Mtlws, Charing Cros; where No. , Et Prize of 20,00ut. was sold in Sixteen SixteLtititA, ilst Lott try,' by WII.I.IAM M(4IAIt;ER scitirrs, South Moit on 100 ND to)N 12 11 1: ' 1 1. 1 40 3 1 : 1 1 5 1 'r e,: f S ti t o ra . c 4 la w ri b le :e; c 4l " d r ; t i ' le b rt o i w Ytm -it e tre tu t s: i i i i r d d r e; : s bi l i a s r heli the Paper, 1 - I ‘terl for the Editor acs. , COUNTRY 111/11a-P,rs, .......iquipell..... 1 iii h no i g okw h ;sy a e s Niro, : 44 .w s. ic v h e , r H y ii fi la ne on 4 hII I . .kyorwich market, on Saturday, rt- E ', i was a good stipply of Grain, and Wile' f i 175. Gd.. , Deans 2 0s. and Oati, IA tree scarcely any fat meat, Bert or Aaiun, it , (ineptly little or ,rio businesi done. 1 : 11 "i Beasts, and the sale dun. 0 Wakefield,. Peb. 1.-We had but 01 4 . rivals of any kind of Grain to•day, as all 1' 34. - is stopped by the frost. Fine Wheats tar! sS'alu ir:yriel;+l:l.7o6:;t:di, a pr g . rea l t 'h g e u re ah w tit a Y s ° l l !: S g i : dSoli'll;Pior last prices . ; middling qualities seateeralerle,r4 Barlej , was more in demand, and sold j ig ,' higher prices ~ other Sorts keep t ` elf u...'re' s Mgjts were dull; and old Malts not 14 'Ir' ; ',.. g o°4 Me 2 ling' Oats but 'little altetalla '°„ 1 1 Grey Pease, front 2g: to 3s. per tio r t e • f ro ' Beans were dull, from ts. to es. per' Ifi arte 4 Wakefield, Jan.!3o.--INVe had but an ilw show of Cattle. at our marks t chic 01 ,f 'i whole were sold readily, at much tire's i as were obtain e d at the preceding tharteLot were 160 Beasts„ and 3,500 Sheep lit . 'L e W"s , . Feb. 2.-We had bat a tnoderi t ' i q bf Wheat at our market this day, an d pr ii; l , on demand at rather more money' p n ,,,, lt 't( !.Oats plentiful, and stead in rice. - 1 `;,0 .-() her things wi‘ boat vacation.. Pric' s !"; 1 ' ,: Wheat, Whttei loos. , to loos. ditto all &ty Barley 365. to 388. atts, 255 , 1 ° 3 1 1 .41 1 ° !" t 9 .60s. Grey Pear, 445. to OP , iy , lac), for Seed, hOs. per gr. Rye ac n .. ,, e ',' t ( /' ‘ Bl . 84. prr ton; Straw, 18d. 40 -- "" 1 NO !Me Pour 804, per sack. 1 Ad ig ' Yarmouth, F d b. e ....„..w, I , A a ~i,.., ~ r,, Gmi. , to -day,,,,,,r Wheat tra.q. was bl , t ' l e i jiiof tine Is. per qr., dearer • 113rIey % .43 ', 111 "d fl ig! atte4.ll:tving,h4ge ordrr. for Setst .,ol ' ll- ' o 4# 11-111.2 i. higher, G ikv N„,, arc. mord 1 , ,,,.1 ° ., l " i ' e4 ,.. 'ale, rats° Oat.,, but Beans Cti4.{.171 6 -i,*.- Particulars as f o ll ow : Wheat. to the. Ballet', 31 s. to 363. G I'll Pal.c , °5 ; 0 )0 ' . Bo;,Its, 38s. to 40s. and Oats, " 4 ' n rat:: rice. O r N ' 71 s;I'lech, Feb. 2.-Oar market b o ili4 j v,-(.11 supplied N 1 i;11 'Wheat and 0216 ? •,r. sold:lscat ity at the 191101.64 iili' 4 „„' ; ; 4 1 645. to 7-ts. prime sorts u p to 130. t'; .it ' i p o .''6d. ; BeanSi Ifoa l . ' ' . 81. to fv.l.' 1":."s. per la , ,t ; a . prillt e nde Nods, 1:34. 2s. titl;trter. I , ' Haddin• gton, 'ran. ..05.-price of W bCa ' '1 io' l'list week, best 45g. eat rent Ylices 4uo# Barley 315. C:oile:1)i' prices 23.. l'' Vl ' V . curre'nt prices ' r64.' to Ns . 1':3 5 211 . 3 , 0 7 k of ; lo. current n‘lv3h; li t t .t i e to tol s 4t 1 1 7 5 ;5 e . 4. i‘ t p o ie:ri t i t ,s. ; eoti i . 1 0 4 A, b h t e v i re r e e rog ‘ f : t ` ::l lii , per boll. tpswich Maiket on the nd . llt• tv l "' 0 4„, li . • v 1 ri3 n ‘ ,.. v ig o i t t sf e h ,: d i ;I ! :: w s e . a g : o n f i:c i : v l3' ,_ . 3l : le r:l l: e V tt y ,o h li e 4 l a s so t . ss.. p a t e o r r i :Cl ir t ie t n i l yas e r t ::: : o l / 3s i gt ! li ti l .. ' : i : fr Peas 's9s. and Oats ids. to v i s , per q r. ,- r ip , i, Bristol, San 31,_:„The price °f T i r' I .l ° this markers, remain: nearl aq Pe r . - or , iz. Wheat per spring sac k, .73 1 ., ' 4) 011 1 ' Malting Barry, , bs. 3d. to 60. 60. A 011 7s. Gd. Oats, 25. rod. to 4s. 3d. Ir u s A i i fromßeef_ 7 9 6 1: . . to to: t s . . pe pe r r av b . n t g . . r, S it tl i4 PP o l l g , s r.,:ll 9q. 9d. per bushel. Good fresh Eng: / e ' r y. Grazing Caitle continue to have a " Et , s , Store . frogs bring high prices. the tG}th.uit. tat:arCvoitifiuno:l:l.ll:l.osu.se, th e I ' 34Y °I V Liadow, Esq. ()fa Son. }' •r oiref On the sth in b t. At Doriffigton, GiOtlCot. n ii r 4 /p t. of a Daughter. " Week, Uppe wet street, the 11 the 2tl of ost be , a lc g li e; ,h 2 71 avi i: l l 1 1 he el:. L fi, :e a r t O l c i aS r i : t t.:::l I lla n si t u i :e S. 11 1,4a r t ri : gl i : i g s : E i tl , 4. 1 1 5 4 . 1 ' 1 3 : i : 6 i r i .' : 3 : :49 : ' , : ,. 1' ). °, 1 . , .5t. , ,11 at Alex.erltia, ill i. gypt. ..., . ,tic i , 1 , , 0 "sit'irs,-Attorney-Genccal or Ora l ' ! liary' l legi " th e 1°44 oil in Portugal• Orli" i" i o f ti' on(l4*r Lord IVell , . - 1 )110 '''''' ,f • 0 " i Ki ni ve, 0.„,„ .ogion, CAptain l! i. ‘: 4 ,1 r. ..r. lularitry, dna laic litlg 3,4 ‘ . ' 10, a l . i l .k li o l °l l (l ) l l l),l ti ll i i i i i i.: e l .is.v )l h . , i i '' , :::: ,n i i v i ( l o 2 l ,: g. tt,,, -( : l l: \ , t r o Z o i l l i, t t is t : i ti : c. : 3 r ,:tt l i i : : l i i : i b, t t .c e i r l i :e: rini l f °e ..o l::: :4 . a lt it t. r ti l li . li cqi i : f t. "l l i li g t .o : ire. „ :l;:i t l . l ::; ol. ai l ti l ., :r ii: ; ,l4 :::: g 4. l. : ; t i ll rile 2Stil ult. at frarrs, North :'l4 " r i r se fr. 7' .4 4 5 , , ,, , Mild daughter ut 'F. ' 11 4 . Paget, -',)‘," dkt. °l.i. •0 in v.. LOY :I e : :::: > 1 ) s :i i l l : .. i ; t r i: i ; ei t;l. 1 11 ; 1 1: , ;: si (,:, :, ; it, fits ial n:; : ~kl ;el ir i n: :::r iei; :i o..; ,:v t ;I t ,_.. 11_, .: 9 Own Ails ' t " V' 4,' , . . il, I:s.q. of Spcingow"" in ta o itt. - 1 1 : 1 1 Win, lit:land. .. t ' Olt \l •LI t ,L.N,I ay. itr his 11,kum: it, Am) 7 1 .„1,07 # 1 Co Iles i',.l t or, I'. ml, MajOr ill OW I ' VC k 5 , - t It, Ilfr : re 01 ,0 TI , V Smut: cv, Lk:44l'. at Layton, jo '''- ''' w%f: the Wile (a 1 1,1,1 v kviidnuin, Esq., • flis!'or ' ' n "'Jim:l:lay . !lit, in PoWis-P 13(:-. df 91 ' Re,• 1 041 1 1 Cract.,tt, anti eii.tat ditugiir Ii 3ti. PR IC od Y,sr• r 0 60 w nAt• A. ~,p' 1104 St 4:, 10.11 a lio0L11:1171, ()Id S. . ,si, , , 1! set;ol )11''i, o,' ()Innitito• 41 1 4:t o ei, 41 , i r ~, A olocrial .11,1ot ",,, os i. tor . . -.,-."-- 133:ik Stuck, Navy ; per Cent. 30 i Irish ; vet* Cent: 4 pet Lent.' 3 per t, enc. t. 66161- 3 Po' L: t. Cons. 65 f tr 6 6 )3 Bank . t. Ann. '7l 13.:i6tris street. Ctogrcncrt tqUi, Crr n ,757:',. • ^ 1...$ .. in,upper k.0wc,....-- . rthiiithOte, hsti. of a Daughter. ' - f , vy mARRIAI, c oi+ , On the id inst, 'at St. lames's, riCri‘.6lllolo.. Pain, to Mary, the second daughter of ''' Vli Lil 1 . of the same Parish-. 10 911 ". thi she th inst. at R oc hdale, G NI 1 Aa r j a (; ) ;oinshoroug4h, to Sault Anne, eldest 11 3 , 4 , 1 ',,, 0 10' . " VI Rev! Robert Cane, Vicar of Norton, ill I l i /1 5)0 4 '4V thi ' Monda y Jast, at Teignstace Chn",,.:irot 1 Dunn; R: N. to Charlotte Fran cel t Pk " l a/1° lathes Templer, Est of Stov ‘ l° ‘" e ' P l ' 1l" 4 1., . 4 0 •' On Thursday, at Chertte . SuttcYr ' 10 1 q Of Tro;tu ns sutio i . to Emily, li ticaold.,llni , ih l i ‘Vl' ll' .o *; John,Dixon, Esti of Chertsey i ti es ~4fit or , On k • ;, - Wiry, at St. Mary-le-bonne, in it ; en f of v inters, ht the County of Kenti I ."10 13 of Samuel kuhort Gaussen, Egl• (9. the County of ticrts. ____...., '~" I „ rt ~.:--f V. :::. 7. '"'. :. ~;,... ' 1 , .i j 1 1 41 4 • , ,J , 1 1 , ii . i 1 vi : ~ .# 1 VI! ; 4 LI, I , . ?.. ' , . ! oi. j 1 4. ~,- :. .- ~4 1t ' .. fr',- ~'= ~:. I ~"