The Sun. — London, England, 1811-11-11 00:00:00

LAW R4IORT. COURT OF KING'S .13E.NCII, Nov. 8. - •• THoMPsoti v. swAsZEY. Mr. PAan.nioved foi a rule to thew cause why. the verdict for the tilaiptiff should notbe setiaside, and'a.new trial granted. I t was an action upon a policy ot inialrance, from. Riga t-tet.tati f y port- or. ports, -in Great Britain. The loss was avert ed, first; by perils of the seas, and ultimately .by capture. Mr. Park, for the defendant, at the trial made this ob jettion, that the license ran, from thence tir any port, &c. Tile ship was diiven into the port of Rostock by bad weather, where her cargo of hemp was taken out, in' order 10 repair the vessel, and where it was all sold as cfrortikseil. The :defendant had paid into Conti money sufficient to cover the _average loss upon 'the ship's arrival 'at Rostock . . and here she took in a totally new Cargo of coin, which Mr. Park cdtnendcd, concluded' the tinder -, writer's risk. 'Lord ELLANBonounit observed, 'that the ship had leave to load and unload; and the, policy was on the ship knO cargo. Mr. ?Atm was aware, that, upon the autbority of the cases of Raine v. Bell,' 9 East. - 105 ; and La' ruche v. °swirl, 12 East. 131. a ship might add to ,l.cr freight provisions and other goods, without , avoiding her policy ;' but this was a total change of cargo, and a new - adventure. The obje4t:uf the tr. der' writers wacto insure Only a single voyage; and the assured. bad made his election to end the voyage irhured at Rostock,. ' ' Lord EL MO/BOROUGH said, that' the delay wait Oct. caNioned, by bad weather ; and the , ship continue her linseed, which was part of her cargo,, on bOardl. L was proved, that it would have taken more 11114 to take in a cargo of new hemp.; ,and corn was substituted-with a view to expedition.. This subrito - tutitin was •degicied upon in a week ; there Was no delay; andihose who. granted policies must con template:the consequences sol such perils of the seas. —Rule refused, t. .. ' .....r.. FLCDGINO qf.GOODs I>Y FACTORS, ' • ht• • - 'll4O ATTORNEY LiENEAAL, movt4 .for a Yule to AbeNs7 Cause . % by the verdict ,for the j defend,mt in this case shoold not be set aside„and .a new trial granted. It was an action of Troyer brought.by the plaintiff, a Spanish merchant,.to recover from the defendant 'the value of trio hales of ,wool, CoMigoe4 , by th e plaintiff to •J person of the name of oke,,whom the. plaintiff had appoioted,his filetor 61.1ltis country, for the tittle of such wools asi 0)001d he 14410gited to 666., bur whi,..11 quantity .t wool in question Coke itad pledged with tlitlo l eridarit for. advarices.made to Inn, oerporittly, and. the delcodaot had 41.ftetWattis edit% erted foot) cash for his own reinibtirsement.—? 'nit: Attorney 'General had coot& oded on the .trial; and he now,ng4in tiobt4itted to the Coury hat, thia the cotomon case of as t - t•i:tor pledging Oct pro ' perty of his principal, whit it„ itfitati:be.vo again.and deaitled coald not do. It wtiti contended on the Oates' shit: by his li,eatroed Vtiepd, Mr. Gar tow' that the preseitt easn was.talsen out of 140.ge oetiA; o p. ; by the CirObrOstance of the bill of lading being iodors,cd to Coke, or • order,. 'rime Was no case, however, among the vat ious decisions on this point, the. Attorney General cot ended,. where a bill of lading formed an iogredient in the case, in which it was uor indorsed, to. the fa dor or In the case of Wright o,campbc.li, in Burrow's Re yorts, tire hill Wing wart indorsed the factor or his order; and io Newsome v. Thornton, it v•as to ' or his assigns; yet there it was held, that he could bovpiedge the property, even where it stood in the 'battle .of the ,brol;cr, because he .was faCtor ; and in nil those ,ca.es,. the persons with wholn the pledging was wade, were perfedly Ignorant that the person with whom he dealt was tt . - 14dOr • . Lord lEa.t.eittortouott s•lid.the'recbtild he ribthirig clearer than the general prineipt ,teat a titetor could • ' net 'pledge the property of ills ; but 'still this principle must be taken with some limitations. No per on could be suffered to collude with one stand log in the relation of a Naar, and thereby toacquire sr right to theprincipal'a I.opertY., BM. if a consignor olgoods chose to give to the couSigneealithe indteia of the properly, andlhe full power of dealiog with it as his own . ; if he ChOSc to give to ,him. a larger authority than a factor reloired, or ~ought to have; then his Lordship thought, it would be too nitwit to that an innocent person, dealing Wit it such . COnSignke as the real proprietor of the goods, ought to_ be the antlercr, Ifere the delepdant saw Coke in pmses. shirr of lot get quantities of wool, which it, was impos sible for him not to suppose his own propel ty,— When he vaw hint "armed with such large ant hot ity, was o lte bfitind. to ioquire,and to ascertain, wheiler it might not bra more limited, or of a ditferent na lore from what it appeared to be ? His Lordship, on the trial„ pot it to tiie Jury to jodge, if, front the circtunstance of Coke's having a large quantity of ‘vool in his posseasion, over which he seemed to tie an unlimited controut, the defendant was not Justified. in •believiog it to th; his own properly, and in dealing with hint upon that footing ? Why had Pot the: 6 . 400, on his faClor thoSe guards trauds of this nature;, Which it • was in his power to have imposed ? hadlte not, on the face of 14_41(64, designated him as his factor .Why did lig give him the character Of an unlimited . proprietor to the, WarlJ, if he did not wish to be bound by his oda ? This was the nature of Isis LOrti‘hii)"S charge to the Jury ' • if it was erroneons, then had the duty been joisledil his misdireaion; MG Justice &UFA asked, did the defendant not know that Coke was only a factor The Arraimay-GE4#RAL,AdmiaN4, Shut be did Lord . ELLettfirafottllti asked, who on4ht, , to' tie i'esponfiihle" for the act of another,. tribe person • who armed him with the, power 01 cluing t h e Ito W.ll not responsible ? Hete Coke •altnitted that he' dirt not intimate to the defendant that the' worils were not his own. The defendant had advanced to him 20,0001. and he offered to put the hills ht into the hands of-the,defendant, wts COti3te,4e of the goods. , • , ATTR ONEY-GENARAI. said, if .the Nog of the factor was to militate against the eoni guor of 4 ; the goods, he did not dispute that here there wail enough of it. M. Justice 8A1LEY...N.." Here the principal'. ow.n act •enables the factor to cotnrnit the traud. he had' put it on the bill of lading, that be vas to be considered only as a factor,- that could have pre vented hitt front committing h." ATTORNEY•GZNBRACt.,-- , -. 4 . 4 Into? does any thing that is nut proper, in that case, is the iitincipal to suffer, for it ?"--Fle should admit that the defendant in this . oase, had. been defrauded by Coke; he should . suppose that he had , told hint every falsehood which the tongue of map could uti ! ter ; but still he contended, : thmigh was Strong instance of abuse practised. by CcAke against the pawmie; still this could not affect tli,e interests of lihrt for whom Alia factor acted. Io the ca i k of Newsoittev. ThorntOn, it. was -laid dOwn by Alr, JtiStice Lawrence, _that a factor 'eminot pledge by the hill bf lading more than by. the goo,ls selvek There tie euniiignee knew n u t that the person from whOni, he derived tight wo,tl tactbr hut this, the Learned Judge held, did not vary the case. IC WM easy (or bun to .k.ve inquired for the letter of advice;act omOatiying the of lading; which would havd'hatistied him as to the real elm racter in which the person with Whom he was con,. trading stood.. But„ said the Leartto' ; JudO, ttl that case, ,if persons will luie sight Of theit mode of dealing, they'riMit. expect to suf fer for their imprudence. The present cast.; the Attornef•General contended,, was in no resvcct to be distinguished from that to which be had now re ferred.• • Lord ELLENBOW6II said, he stiould cippose them was hardly to be found an :iiistance ftl one , Merchant of the city of London calling'on another to prOduco the letter of advice accoMeanyitig a 'bill of lading. In re+eta of the lailgtnge held by sic. Justice Lawrence in the case rett:tlV4 to,. 1)14' Lord ship- Wished' the Attorney-Geneial,. however, ,it) take his iule, that the point night be fully Considet= ed ; at the sante time lie must confess, that it did hitt press much on his mind. fle thought it ti sound principle of. morality,: that it a Wriii wrepld be Safe he should arm those thing tor him with 'suchli: united' authority as wao likely to keep . hint sale. — Rule ,Niyi granted. SH ft - 01301 1 AI V. Nrr, §erleallt 111351 4 moved for a rnl;,: to sleety Cinlie why tht* Verdid for the it) this case ghonkl not b 6 set aside, and a romsnit entered. It \vas an atlitin on a policy of insutimce on a Ham butget ship, with a cargo of wheat, leoinAtchangel this country and the point , he had vntleaVotired ao make . on, thd trial, • and on. which his Lordship had given him liberty to move` ernart, was this, whether the voyAgn was no(illegal,. a 4 being gen eral)? Co the'onvigation laws, it having hen de. elated by 'the Atiof, the 12th Chalks If. 'lbw. it shOuld , itot be lawful to import into this country goods, the produce : at any foreign state, except in vpselta beloreging to British f l / 2 01) . jeti4, yr in vesso9 belnivng tojhe,countiy of which the goods sO porte4 are, the produce ; here the:wheat:which con , stnuet.d, .C4rgl) to -be imported wps the prodPce or litpaiia, land the:vessel Was tt vessel lA , •;lPugi'l l P Hamborgh, The Livarned—Serjeant ,tI4I not deny that the navigation , laws had oeen relnxf!cl by .an Act 01 the 48th, of the Kiog„by .Wbich it is,dcclated, that it might. he lawful, to *heifer Iris-.Majesq,.'hy and with the advice and consent' of his Privy Conn. to grant licenses for the importation of such goods as should Wspecified.• Here, holtever, - ahttre, were. no articieti . sputi,tied in the licente,,,wilicti Was : a -licensp for the•nnpottation•of ell goods that law fully may be importett except stock-flab, : German linens, and oil. Ile contended, that it. wu im possible to consider this as a speciticatiott'under the Act of Parliament. HZre there was tiu et) Utlltta -1101! or specification whatever.. Lord 11.14 t brounovott.—" It COMIC& to this, What is. the meaning of .the words, Cioo€4 to. be cifted ?" Arroallor G2NERAt.. —r" I contend tlut it 'here Means,,ovety'-thing not drohibited." r • Lord Et.t.r,blopitovou Serjeant Best might take ltis rule. M. Set jeint , 1311.`r therC was 440111er point on with:nllo bad not , his I,6rdship's leave to mote, and which, .therefore, ,if he succeeded in it, would only entitle him to a new trial, and ,u;ut to have.a nonsnit entered. The licenso was Ihnitcil to the September, and -Lad expired before the vessel attempted to sail, which she did not do 'ill au catiy doy i>a Oddbe(; _ Lord I•Callna .pouibly con ceive, that it was ever contemplated,,. in granting those licenses,. that the . whoir adventure oust be consummated within the tiro ,: to which :they pie Serjeant BesT.—She had not, twre be,guti her voyage, at the t,inte the license. expired.. 7 Lord ELl.etinononott.-r", Yvs ; #4e bad taken in, her e;irco, and ,theretnre had begun The sailing of the vessel. had only ,hecu prevetncd by Captont-house delapi." Mr. Scrjeant 13asT said, it- had been ruled by the Court of Common Picas, that a, ves%el which had not, sailed tttUilt r- the, lice nieexpi red, 'wits tiappr9- te k ied by-the license. • - . . . Lord F.l.LENAOitouott felt every possible yetheB for t 'decisu , ns or any.o; her Court but where he law-that, a vessel actually was .at the place, from ~whence she was to-proceed:on her, voyage, a d trod taken in her cargo, his Lordship could.not but con ceive that to be a . voyage which had begun. 'Ille• argument of the Learned Serjeant be equally, stropg, tinder the license, it the losi had taken place only a single clay before that lo which it was • limited. • Mute 4Viti granted on the first point, teftised to Ow second., rATnitiot4 tt. G P 4 DE,.510.0 KZ. GAe now moyett for a rolu..to sliewCatlqe w by the nonsuit in tina ease should not be tit.,4lfirbl, ' lnrd 2 new trial ;,t%ltitecl. It emordeed tit...+ - ion of great importance its point of valne, at, tmtieipistre of it, depended 4unis to the amount of ttuwarils of. /00,00>i, and it was also, a question of sotne:intoiest in point of law. The detendaut w4s parthitt mer ch.int,, who had a gr,ga.tValittY of g 0 9 (13 turniAeti him by different merchants and defilers in this country, through he means of hi* agents or factors, • LaNDP I.I Printed by 1 4 1 Cif A it•D HARR' S, at No. 4, MlttLatt.,court, iiow.‘tragt d'p r oitiaad by WILLIAM AltlnG F. It Se PPS, South MO s itos • net• G r`l T " °r 64141". _ . . . " IL.- a a...L.4..4.n rinnet be addressee. ~-. Messrs. La ,flazabelle and Co. 'The _goods ordered from the present pl;tiontis consisted 01 rt quartlity of hosiery, 'file goods were invoiced to La Itaiabeile and 'Co. and the witness exlmined to prove the ftir oislsing, having proved Olin they were icki (tidied on the credit of La Razabeile and Co. with. whom the plaintiffs, at the time, thought . they were dealing, Leis Lordship was of opinion, ,that the plaintiff could nos now furnroundlind demand laymen( from she the ciefenclont,!--alte plaintiff. was of course two suited. , . Mr, GAtteow, however, now maintained, on the authority of a variety of cases, hat the plaintiff was entitled to - recover from the defendant,as if he had appeared ,as the original pnrchaser of the goods. A person selling goods to one, of whom he had ) or had eut, knowledge, Wight afterwards recover payment front another whom he .did not know at tilt time, 'hut who, he had since discover ed, had a dormant interest in the goads Old:- He mightlecover,,for instance, nom a -dormant partner of whom ,he had titi knowledge at the time of 'fur-, nishing the goods. 11 the justice and commercial convenience, as well as the. voimnercial good sense, of she casei were , looked to, it would be found to lie etniicly with the plaintiff, Who received the goods )—The defendant Glandessiquev. '-For Were they ordered ? ; —Fi,r the defendant noel, . Who was to receivv ,the i)rtifit•nf „then} In st foreign market.?--The defendant Giandessitoez.. Lord ELLBNIS01101:100 , was of opinion, tnat the plaisititfotust here be.supposed to have dealt on the cre:dis tit the agent or .factor alone. A.; he 'under sto ti however, that a himila4 point had been. re 4 served by IrLearned Judge at the .Assizes, , the Learned Counsel had better take his rule, -that she question might be solemnly .decided.—itute Nisi granted. • ' NTT SMITH. Mr. LAWES, the,younger, moved .on the part 'Of his trie'nd, Mr.. Brougham, that he might be dulged rill 'Monday, ai had beep done it a variety of cases te.ronve fora Rule to .sheW cause wlii a new, trial simuld not be.grartted in . this'case, which 'wai l hoiore his. t i or,:ship ;it the Satmgs atter last" Term, in Westininster. ..tt,was rieCS;lly tea Rrhi't.t, 111 nVecituetit having beep'.e..xeoted by ib t 'ant, and if appearing that he w:l6 drunk aC the time he executed it, thu•'grifibliti had bton nonsuited._ Ills Le;iiiitM Lit • ieud", `Mt PiOlgliatu, howeyer,'wati " 0 e , prepated ,wo . 'eAties :hat though a person,. might have beeii that at the time he, signed "the agreement, - that was not sufficient 'to set it inside, unless it should be also slibwty that he WaS in Ow company of the other partY,4natid had:' een: brought into a state. of intoxication by him or through his Meting. .• _ _ },Ord ELLEN2OROUGNI 0310, perfealy letSted the case". ' : The witnexs called 4,y the , itlnintiff ilimsgif to prow the agiconient, prayed on the Coratary, tirdt the defendant was. in, a state , of 'complete and tatal intoxication, There. never wai a clearer.,cr.se.. - Mr. LAWt$ was 41e0ot in cite ca es tti when Lord Et.iitraßoßoti'ati observed, that it ci3sim poslible arty case . could be found which 15ent,' the length of saying, that a man perttily drunk cit)hl be a party to an agreement. His Lordship, there fOre, positively roNsvd • tiny indulgence in a case Which tf,e Court knit W: to be untenable. • COIJWP OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. 9. GOMIIIIRLL V. CHAPMAN. This wag an action of trespass, tried at Lewes, in . Su,s , ?x, hi which the plaintiff had recovered da. , 11) , p,.-r; agitibit the 'defendant, 3001.. 11r. Setirltlt LENS said,' that the . clefendant - was an offieefof the trustees of a new road near Lewes, and lie . relt himself authorised, under the 49th Geo. ch. t'2. sett. 44:'' and also tinder the-comnion Highway AM,. If:renter on the premises of . the plaintiff, and to•takes quantity'of stones from: off theni;' for the pitrpose of malting the road.o The: At of Parliament, 'however, specified the manner . in Which soil or; stonei:Should - ,tie:rakerr from privafe gratinds, and also-the manner 11),whial).enitipensa tion tdiould he mule to the owners.- ,It direaed,. that it the proprietors and the trustees cou'.4.A pot come to, a private agreement, the trustees should serve a not ice on > the proprietors to appear -after ten : days, before two Magistrates, : who are employed to settle' .the quantity of compensai . lion,' and by *hose decisiOn both parties are bnund i If was confessed; that this notice was not regularly Served by plaito iff 'on 'Llefendrint ; and the Chief Ba. ron„ . who tried the cause, Was . , therefore obliged to direfit the Jury to fi nd for the plaintiff. The pre stit apphcation was, that their Lorthltips should 'case to come before the Court, for the Orpnse of inquiring whether 3oul. the awarded da- Olages, that a'ttnr v4itat ion ; 10 inquire farther, whe , titer by a triter Of consent,' sent by plaintiff to 'de lewlant; previonsiy to.taking the' btones, ,Was not a waver Of the regular notice.' it 11W iPertliel should be allowed , to,statid, it would bring,rnin on the de filitclatti,'Why WAS , a mere officer of the public; and not persofially ink:rested in the ttans.4ction. Rule to itiow causo ptted. Sir W. I)turnmond conceives, that lie lias dig . cove - njti in Mika the hbriat-place of . 1-tinnihal.— addUces . several reasons tor thinking, that al though flannibal, fell in Bythynia, by the perfidy of King Prdsias. and the Roman General Flaminins,,Yct his 'ashes were . brought from thence to repose among his countrytrien and relatives at Malta. It appears,t that in the year 1701, in the distria of Ben (ihisa, in M 4ia, was discovered a sepulchral cave. In the wall of this cave was a hollow square, in 14V WaS cut, in Phenician charaders; the epitaph anntvell, Wkich'Str W. has thus translated ' . • The Inner charsiber of the Sanctuary of the • sephtilete uf,Ritilo4lk4i. Illustriow.iii the eonsuinniation of calamity. Ile was beloved.. The , peopia !Amcor when arrayed In order of battle, Hannibal, the on of fisr-Meteohe Sr.i W. 1). ,aystiss, that, the name of he dist.fifit'of where stands. this sepulchre, .I3en Ghisa, is 3' eqvroption what ; ancient writers intended by area ram ,of Ahow Oisc 9 p,.whicti was nearly related tq tliat 13arca, or, by transposition, Boma, Amilcar, would be the Punic Order ; anti, as on the Bitt-Meltcb,! • M,:~ E NATIONAL DEBT. 1 A n Account of the Reduetion of the National t r am the'ist August , 1786, to the tit. No. iOinbdr, 181 t Kt:Armed try the Sinking Fund - ,CL845 , 1i3g 1 frranslericti by land T redeourd - 2,0-1.2" Vato by Life Annuities purchased . 1,5.36,6'01 424914426 . K,735 ,6 1 1,219,5 14 92,531 On AccJunt of Great Ditto of Ditto of irriperl4l Ditto of Loot iv Itop:it;11 Total , k 1 19, 962,037 The sum to he expen.led in the ensuing‘l,larlti S 64. id.' ~. Agent) ............. uti flame been received from Mr...C. 11.. ,-?_,Gxfittrp..l., at Athens, of a recent di,icovery in ilia isle of Egitoa, when excavating thc earth t() ;Iverrlil 'the Hyperthral in the ancient temple of jopitet Pantielleiiiii,. c onsisting at great n utpht: r otit,,,i menti of Varian marble, Of the 'nose heaiiiiiii .-culpture ; the piteN of whiCh nearly complete sii: teen statues, bet Weett , five and six feet in iiiih t, c n nro :a lti n el y tin • ij o eo f r.ril t (: l i t . , l t io n t I is s n c scpi,ot,ligNevtibeirraalit.uil(iila;sictltilnoi(pn,t,tilrrivst.el o:(ficeiTilvr,irli)::,:laivilas: iporte:,:ieddie_idittAleirrt.:Latorrtial rt t : t in t - r . t - t a 4 c a e n . d . ' years ){ht sholdd have dug three feet deep, as most of these love ball , EXTRACtltrqi.ikltY OcpumusNcu ,..—A ve, n Nurl'" y OP tar and shocking ciita stanc e took: pine i m street, cOmaierciat-ioad,- on Toesiby the bill ii'' tlt In the' afternoon, a 'll , _ Ir. ..---- at vithlo# deal hin a yeti . , mysterieus mantle: , i..h. voi wit tii'sever.:il neighbours about. hallpast : a r c ostitO'i e d° ll.thii - i e t : e l l i a ns :: g :l ctio e o b nui : cdt i ‘. s l::: a a rri ,:it S e ,e ) ,tal e d .r f dy ° e Ci t i l d ib r te ) :: ei ; file w ll aA oeg s l tu fo ti S or v ir : r ie t to r o lg hor l u i e r eal t ao .l i e s bc dn ilel uNl o : sl : l ll l :il ia l e i ‘ t r ::: li e el :::: tr i tn a i l t d d : ll :: i i i. e l3 , l l s i ih4 : ii t tl o t l i e l til l i l l l3 : Coining again an hour after, he more mined hitii i when he perceived a deep itilPr e* ` ) : l ::.jslsci°t:rl,eeuila.,e:tinl‘lnvcn:e:iglincttHti,ilio:ge)ltte:uovcfitr'eau.stla.,...c:ts'.:t4'r.toelt:),lll.,ia:rnteub:lbre::tik,nt)‘od:t):iy,tt.ttrocsar:r:e:qi,arin,nn:iyll,oc:t„de!,';:,thtirctieie:eettxiic:i';oritt,,llB4ah,,lfut‘eirt:':tlr,idrlli( jteiii,ct'nr.s.lcci,,,:oo;t‘trl:l3r. :re s ,t., y . lriet ed riii, e C ti, ' ,irti l oi () Y , t ,,stiiiri : ll l ,l Y , llll ; : „l ' isi ‘ ei bt:v l . ll, e i V ii4,lo ite isti l ,,, .... l : fork, YC)ll""tr'et, CiarlilltreiktO4d. l i " fiver 2' . Hartle o f 1,1 0 ' hayit:g laiely had some fit •iciists s tolen " - ," l ,: ii nie applied to a reputed ciinjitror, I , : town IV i 1 i ° ,,,,,j, iv ("I the (‘ Wise 1143'1),' of Sp ritiiii 4; 10 , 11 ' l ' i '''' . l .-. ; to direct bit! . warm to. tied thenii wil t) 11) ,: - , ;: 1 1 1 o ' ile eitilinei4it a particular vme, the pre").'6 - o n hif of his neighbours,' whbin he.. pointed out. Vi i ; l'tili going thither, and mention:Lig, ou A' b. 3! 3 ‘ l, tog r ei t, l3 l : d t t ( lc l N: a t i i • n: o . n c r e i t e o d: t l e i l; t i: s.‘ t , T ;l l :k i ) e rl : l i i ht t , ,a fel l ow al gotil:l.lvltli'l6: e ma n ' i g l ri t e i h t 7 i t i i s rl e ta : l-: " :1:1; t '; ',:sli i ll3‘ ; ' : "'. r sted. The cotsjuror • T,ir,etnyis" : come. a long with toe, titiii ‘v" w ill d,, I The y went; 4114, 10,114 aigonishii)eri! Pr II!. ~.0 stolen jo i, is were . tound, as etas ) other hi% =,,wrrer, Laneolu 'ended, and has been committed to for . trial. . I °I T A few day s . ; . Nit r O Vit i li r a ee tt l Yl ::: G: j i a t:e ldi :r 6d y So .6 . 43l : ft i .r s e l' , i‘h'i IP2le t i t: Sl:a i t)ea h Ei e gltileiarrl:l' r el l e aW : lif) : lBll.l.ll°:llllleinebele , l3:eb i lvts o Pelit .c r;ve k ha3;Uatn i F9l. 6 6stivae:tret : 4lllelS‘l'.l4lgll rn i'll ' lti'C'l. ( l;'l ) le' r lit;l o 4;i'''°'' Sunday wai , it, comiequeocep J a ; to tn d they ail' elaePt ono woman, escaped without& tao ing, the cotton - melt Len' 4ll4l/l e re r 'ed tu property of Mr. NVilliarn Carrie, %cis diicuty.oo o f ~he an•fire, and,. notwithstanding the ex i er i , i , bo or. many hundreds of the inhabitant), 0)e N"t 014 which consisted . of three' stories and n g"to!ceil 14) all—the machinery,. it -contained, wil s 11it.pit° Ashes. The rapidity of the fire was so r e 6 3 1 f 3 0 :biurn, down tho, whole fabric in leo th at , ot t IA hoitr 'from the fir's, apticarance et snu'l,ei!il, TA shout , 20 minutes 'after, the. flame. v.:a s ! ' 4 l - 0 - ' c 'd:ltio l° great 'water. oi heel and steatn-eniin,i Q n t ; .Arn, e t of the mill, and A' (OW •btltitileS *of orton'rag ele .otit at . greal hazard., only -escaped the d01ci, 1 ,, 11 , 01 ,10r `cnent Matty4amilies• are thrown out °'...,,"")i Os tatent by 'the' ailcident., .korrunately 0 Pe r-- 'huri., TWO PRIZES OF FIFTEEN THOt/SANP ~............ . . 411 OUT OF THE THItkE _, IN THE ' I.:011'611Y itiS"ENl)l',O,, WERE' stltil.) AND Skti‘itEi) . . . . BY" F.NTON, ,or,sirf 2, CORNHILL, AND 1 ii, COVF,SI-, . WEiEitE -TIM:I'I'S AND St-lALID , 411 E SE't.,IJO • FOR , v '4IIE ,SICIA:LX, L(yrTERy OF Olst,‘,, fi,. I'lc:llln7S., . f t - , T0',.13,E.D1LA.5 00 WlSr.t,gii) NOVEMI3.-. " • , on Fridly 'night at hii Lordship's liougoinopIC'14114110f; fitreet, the Non. Lady St. !oho, of ,'..lariftlicot, , The same day, ptr.s. kismry Pitcher, of Son, .10 ISIAB Rl4O. ja t h e IN On 'ltursday; at Sr. IVlArthits in the Hol'l'll,oo' Pleydell Houverla, to gi . s IN ria A'Cort, oitlh".r.e Wriliarn A'Court: Oar' t. :t Lle‘rtesbury..iii-V iill God.rilcys.turtieoottrygli:tlqt..tefe,itl..irvq;o:itrid)roCystic,,,:l4,',Eyto.t t.,l's, diese.x, to Dilrs tirtyve,. relidoi the'latO loittl )14 )"' of Akttburn.greaa Halt Cokfoty of 1/ 01) Y' . itt.El). This rnoming, after a lott illness, in Pcr S r :'ll 2 tilY ea ' ii f e Sncat h., of 1-14troii-gioden ourtntho 'lO On the 6th , imit, at, tireintord Hi 11.,, itirs, , iit ,,, William' Bum oi, F. 6 4 I Turiiiiint.nail, rieu, .... )' , Sill re, ' O • , 0 tit tile Itll4 . On Onus/fay last, at Cnple, fte4fOrdsilire, , (1 ,,, ago, i'lli'illn.s Earl 1.,t1411 ow, iii his fitly-tittri_.vc'' 470 0, T lie $2.11p: clay., ill the rime of Wu, ;001, jun. only son ot Mr, CROWS, GrOcer 0 (14t1'":"f Lorslo' cousin s ,, ti t al.:: ithi:rtt,tiet:trnriecas leacotitcoy r eltilef.s:Cs.,7 t eS ' i :; - 1. 4 8 7: 1 1 001 I' riday evcaing, at N4wsells in }lefts, on l oom ' Ail of th e Lord SeAsey, . , ' w r it (:, , . ~. I.: The sante, evening, klrs, Ackernlann, .1 tiolph Aciternmon, Of t tie Strand. :of C a, 1 .. 4-. i.ately, at EXCIa, Mias` lititetnnber '4'7 -mamba, of His Majesty'a 6114 ' SYCII6 ' -ma hi 'RA I T i LON Di) oi t "):0"i0. at or HIGH no 0 co.- MI la!I r ~t:... ~J, .., i 7.1 1 ii, i