The Sun. — London, England, 1811-01-03 00:00:00

'.~. 1' 14' • ~~ t i ~. -,,•~,w itovptd short when about to disclose acme such fraii• olletiors, and told " You will not be allowed to speak against Lord Harowicke's Administration:' 11..? wished the House to see howimany pensions had hew) granted-10w many warrants had been issued within the period to xhich he :alluded ; no less a sum than .t 00,048,0001, had been so dislosed of, and acquittances given to the paTties. This fraud had bean committed on the public; he could prove it, and if called upon, he would read the pfoofs (Which ware in liii possession.) to the douse. ,The Hon, Gentleman hp. expressed his grief, on . .isecount of the calamity which had fillen on the King, and pro seeded to °mole, that great pains !. id been taken to represent his Subjects as disaffected and rebellions, Ott a time when their con,ltict Wks distinguished by the must patient sufferance and by the sincerest af• tection. This ton had been done - at a time when their petitions could not reach the Monarch, when it. was impossible for them to get beyond the desk in the Secretary of 'State's Office. In , 1792, a message had been sent to the House, 'which repre sented the country to b e in a state of insurrection since which ,period he could prove a cont , nual system of fraud on the public mind had been acted upon.. To this source, and to the disunion which had unhappily prevailed in the Royal .14 . roily (but %/c ilia be rejoiced to see at an end), he tuiceA, all the calamities which had tallest on the nation. But fur tho,e tatal dissensions he felt con tideot the empire would now have been in a Much better Mate. From t 792, we bad been at war it h all Eutope, and twelve hundred of the p u b.: lie Money had been spent, in cotiserpience of the adoption, of this system' of fraud. He knew no h o w an act of legislation could be made in the man ner piOosed. There had been Various modes of making laws. A,t one tioneTthe 1.141 g could ot 'Belt make laWs.: anpther period of our history pets of l egi slation were made by the King Lords. • Down to the ;period of Henry VII. Ow ee.ipte ware never mentioned but •as petitioners or sopplicants. Since that period it had been enacted, that no law c ould liae 'force without the joint aoiu tl mity of King , Lor ds, and Commons. This, in •addiliort to the intiumers already betitre them, had .teen esiabli,h+ect ila the case of Lord Macclesfield, Ail they had to do in ti.e present instance was,to.ad idiess the , Ptinee to take upon himself the 'authority of Regent,' The Executive Power ought to be le- Stored to the Consthution without delay. He again "proicbto d e o air st the proceediogi and thought .theyltad dace utictaist nut and treasonabli.--He Meant no otience to any litt; man being, but such was his ,optnion, of their cue- duet. • Mr. PONSONBY observed) the Report had no, yet been brought up, though the Gentli , man ho had spoken had seemed tg.regard it as beiog u n On this suggestion , the qu estion was put by the Speaker, and the'Repoli oidered to be brought up. Mr. Laishingtori brought it op accordingly, and on tho seconn reading el the first resolution, Lord Port CH 1 , ,S l'Ult I He felt, obliged to se pest, what had • b• en the pr,lude to almost evi,iry speech, , that personal character ought to 'be put, wholly our ,olconsideratioo, and there never was a period when that 'c'oul'd so Well be t i o nt., there esisted but °lie and - the same opinion of, all the three Royal Porsonagcs who had beer mentioned, ..The present CIIW varied front all that had , been al luded t 0 ,,. as what they t,.rcl to do was to 'vest the power of the King in an . heir apparent of full age. In making- provisions to gnaid.against anticipated dangers, they oft ht to cons) icr , what were the na ture of thOse dangers, - as' well as the probability.ol their being to be encountered hereafter. In inflict instances it might be apprehended. of alteribg•the tact:elision to the Throne. , That danger, 'howeter, criud tot be dreaded on the pro-ent OCCHSIon, in en. trusting the ro) power its the Heir Apparent. In: former instances-Ali:4e were minor dangers to be feared, of which no.!appiCheogion co uld 'memo -. t ,ined at the present... - day , NVaa theft:, he * W ould ask, any mor e danger in giving th e H e ir A pp arent the power, of ,Making Peers as Regent, than there would be in entrusting him with the same power at they-must, when, in the course of nature, he suc ceeded to the I hriine of his father? Why should they suppose he would he jealous of the. Lorda,who would in all probability be the prop of his throne, and also of that of his posterity ? The , Right -Honourahle l il Gentleman had seemed to condemn his ow n as, no sooner had be 'proposed that the Regent should have the 'power at creating peeragett, than he proposed an alteration. If be were to form a jUtig- Illt:ta of - The Right Henour.ible Gentlemen's ino tive for scidoing, he should regard it as emanating from the hope of obtaining a little popularity in the two services, and thus catching a few votes which Might utile , wise escape , him. 'But Were these any •gronndson which 01(1 could consistently allow him tt e pnwer of so rewarding valour while they restriaed himiiri other , eases 1.,--The Right Hon. Gentleman had (*opposed on extreme case---a hero w all the gloryof triumph dying without his eersga. But What was 'therein this situation to it). -Auence them as the Right Hon., Gentleman wished? Supposing a•ntoial or military commander.ilms situ. ated ; if he had lived' long enough to know .that.' he had the thatik-i and the admiration of his country, worthf it net bermatisf4etnry.to hiin to know, that the honours and r ewards dee to his valour would be conferred on 'hose nearest an d dearest to hint, though e,,itstances rendered it impossible for them to be • ci given at that'petiod t o him I The ground on which it was proposed to' Withhold front t t h h at e it Regent the . pnwer'of ,granting pwes wss im priper for the Regent • to c 'do ahy thing which was not' anthor:yged te nesaity; which the King ..atotrld. rot ha t e 'it in his power to annul on Isis recovery. Tlie King, on his recovery, might disapprove at the hotiours so eonferred: Ile might regard them a s part of a change of System—jealousies might in cOn sequence arise in the two services, and thus it might be more dangerous to allow thethan Pricetod. to create that peerages as eart of a system, grant polder which might only he exercised to au ittf;tt lewd cape. The dothine laying down the dangeis that tnight, arise from allowing; lom 10 give plar,es tor life he thought riajelltoll#, II was propoied.to give ' b to sotlicieut authority to remove the inisters of she crown—vtliese ho called themselves,Mthe Kind's .perional Jerench-rs, ITe might remove at pleasure the iti-ght.Hmn ioralli- Gentleman and his v - v h o h r train of Hight ti .liournblo inures."—Not one of the Gentlemen op. osite . 11;0 thoug,ht proper to assert 6141 w ought 'HQ.' to have that power. ft! mi ?: ht constitutionally remove the wlinle of the Adminis tration, ba if he pr-;sumed to make a clerk of, the irons, or a surveyor of tie mel‘titig, — why, 'then the person of the King was outraged, the royal authority endangered. His Lordship here look a %ICW of what would probably be the feelings of his Majesty on his recovery, on finding aach powers had been exercised by the Re4eut. The question, he observed, was not what it mi,:,ht be proper to suspend, or to abolish, but whether" ht.; Regent should, or should not, ex ercise these powers °idiom ily exercised by the I,.;:ing.- , - Ile thought it inivroper to k , eaken did government ot the Regeni by Ili+ puoposed restrictions, and was of opinion, that by torboariog to fill up the sinecure places, that might fail vacant within a year, wire- , Cher the Mmistets ot the Regent or of ihe King • should thin be in power he !bought such an tic- cumulation of siti.Lutes ai might Übe') be a their di , j „ sposai; would probthly he more a' sttoett com 7 plaint than if they were disposed of as they became vacant. The t,inectires whit!) teil vacant. might be abolished with propriety, but if the disposal of them was SUSOnde , ), it would' but increase their Import . a 'lce. He' was averse to nrtkitg the offices of the. King's Houiehoid mom - mt. Tili4 was not a lime for an increase of stwe, and therjore when there were an ibuntlance of officers who could not be allowed access to the King's. person, new officers ought not to be ap,. )oioted for the Ileg , -ot, to add 10 thjborthens of the 'people. Brit then it %%as sold ttiOrxvence of suet). tin estabii,luniAlt would not exceed 14 or 15,0001. ftuat might be the amount of tl'e salaries at the `icers, but it 'l,4as not the eNtLitt 9e ate whole al. eirdattt eXpi;nees of the provost chest:►bAishtliem. As .0 the precautio►►s ►aken ro guard the interest and Jerson of ti.e King, expedient as it mig:,t be to • guard them so as to prevent any obstacle to his re sumption of power at a proper time, histoty furnish, cad them wiiji many histories of ulurpations, &c. but where 'could they hod an instance at an Heir Apparent code:it curing to dethrone a Monarch en threned in - the hearts of his potpie, by such means as creating - a few pt:eiage„s, gi.ing away a few'places, and changing a few "ANN at the lied-Chau her ) they told — constituents that they had placed barriers, to secure the tights of the King front inno vation, they would express then approbation of their conduct in Parliament, but if. they 'had told them that. they had.doi e this by keeping a few sinecures vacant, and by keeping a few. Lords of the Bed chatnner,Who could have 'no chaqce of gaining access to his' Majesty, the people Would Alien Say, " We will never again be. represeined p y such . foolsas you. At The'rate . they ent on it was impossible fur them to supply the detect in less' than a month: He wished them to consider whin was to be done ~tithinthe coot se of that month. By the ifclof Yeb rwry a question of, the greatest consequence was to be deetued—the question wheti , er or not we were: to go to - wld'r with the only thew Power with which we were not already at war. The earliest period at which we could: hope to see the Regent appointed, proceeding by Uhl, was, the first of February, so that they Vk 0014 net leave him one day to consider that itimportant question. What inconveniences, What embarrassments might trot letse from the absence of the executive power ! He 'would suppose that the Bank of England 'hada month ago declared them selves unable to procure bullion foi the service of our army in Pertugal- , -w bat, under finch circum stances, could, have been done to save the army, and preserve the plighted faith of the nation ? It was' roost important that not one hour should be lost in 4upplying the executive power. Those who now took upon themselves the responsibility had the confidence of nobody but themselves, and were they to besuf fered to decide on a.questieo of piece or war' with out controul ? Ought this to be suflered when they knew not - what line of coedutt time Regent would pu:sue, and would not allow _him time for reflection, Inc cunsequence-might be, he ,would find himself obliged to act without due deliberation. He could not but feetnnech for the King, but somethingought to• ,be felt for ,the Regent, who, in times like the present, took on himself so heavy a responsibility. It was their duty to consider the events with wheat the times were pregnant, and consider if acting as was proposed they. would not endanger the interests of the, nation, as well as the safety and-honour 'of the Crown. The Noble Lord' concluded by moving as an Amendmtlot, that the words" subjett 'l6 such restrietiotut, Sim" should be left out in theilesolution, Sir THOMAS TURTON seconded the Amendment. He chara6terised the precedent of 11/38 as a half. formed embryo, the, offspring of the last of power and thelove of place. He denied that - it was ,peisi ble, while' every other eye in the kingdom . was watching with anxiety the faintest dayvninga of re-, turning reason in our beloved Monarch, that his sea should So divest himself of all natural affetioti, as to beinsensible to his restoration to health. there. was 'a 'consideration, either of 'a delicate nature, which he,, Wished to impress on the House.— 'they were going to pr,soot there resolutions to the Pritica of Wales. Were they .quile sure that he would' accept the office which they, were desirous to entrust to trim ? Might not his Royal HighneSS consider the acceptake of that office, so 'limited, - as inconsistent with hit duty to the , ConstitUtion ? Might not, the other Princes of 'the Blood be aCtuated by similar motives ? If so, what t, situation' would the country be plated ! Pos sibly the'Right Hen..GentleMan opposite would say they could, go on withent,the govereigh authprity. Theyltnight,Perhops follow the example set them in' France in the reign of Charles VI. when the Chan cellor-stet the royal seal to the pbblic documents, and nearly, robbed the heir to the throne of the succes sion. He trusted, however, that these politieA,San grades, who werehltediog - and reducing the Consti tution, would ;toff be alloWed much - longer to con tinue their r destrudive pradieta. He defied them to adduce an instance in which there had been any restriction im prised by Parlian)ent on the power of the Monarch, so as to place a part of that power in'obey ance. He then adirerted to the various precedents which had been brought forward, and alluding par ticularly to that , of 1788, which had been dwelt up on with such reepliar emphasis by the Right Hon. Gentleman nrposite, remarked, that the fondhess.of the Right tintioinable Grntlemln foT that prece de af 'reinif4ed him of a distich whieli he had,fre quently be.IM repeated in ht* juvenile dals, and which, adapted to the occaaiinlii would run thus— here stands a preceacut ; mho rat it• there ? • A better man than you ; touch' it it you dare:" F.-OsIMNE declared that.he telt it to be a duty which he owed to the pri►ic+pies which had re commended him to his Constituents, to protest agitiot the ori4iiini i•esolution, and against the argu ments -which had been advanced in its favour. He contended that the dot:trine on which• it .was wand- eat was in the highesk t chgree I.ln,..onstitutilmal. How could the' two 1-touses . o . f Parliament beAnd to supply the detijency in the executive Afflao- rity it they supplied it in such a manner, as to leave that authority in a - diminished state ? Let the House cou,ider the A.ffea which the pre sent` proceeding mig:it have: in ,future times.— When once by asituning the power of limiting. Ott! authority of the . Resent the arinciple had hert established that it was coktipeteut to the two louses of Parliatnent to make a difference be- ‘N.een that, and the Royal Awhority, who could ell but that at some future period - tht principle might be used for the purpose 'of conferrjug on a Regent an 'authbrity exceeding that of the Sovereign? He denied tint the Royal sandlot) had been given to the untiniThed proceedings Of , the years )788 apt! 17P9. With resped to the speech, flow tine Throne, which had beeo quoted as a proof of that sanction, he would say that it mot be considered either as the speech of the Sovereign,' or •as the speech of the Ministers. If as the speech'of the Sovereign, adieu- to 'all fie4orr, of discnssiOn in. Parliament ; ,if •as the speech of the. Minister, . adieu to, the assumption that .it conveyed the Royal sanuion. No Man entertained a higher resped for therivate virtues of his Majesty.thati hiniaplf. He •woulti go further on this •subject thari.,bad perhaps been hi• Otero - gone ; and vs oold declare, that hr his opi 7 nion, the country owed more to the private irtues and to the moral charadiir of his Majesty thati to all the public measures of his reign: But while be stated this, lie could not refrain from prOtesting against, the use which ival recentiy•been made in that House of the 'general conviction leis .Majestys. virtues, in order to influence the decision of , a question, v.hiCh ought to Cie detemitted . vothout any reference of a personal nature. Mr. YoRKE sincerely congratulated the county of Cambridge on possessing a Representative who did so moth honour to their choice as the Noble Lord., The. Noble Lotd had equally distinguished himself by his talents and by his loyalty, although in his argument he w 445 under the, necessity of ditferipg front him. It was not his inv.-talon to occupy much of the time of the House brethis exhaust ed subject ; but hp would entreat their attention while'he stated the circumstances of' the case before them. In the first place his Majesty had been declared by the two Houses of Vasliament un happily incapable o( discharging' the functions Of Royalty. This declaration was foUnded on the' evidence of his Majesty's Physicians. But these Plgsicians were unanimously of opinion, not only that' his Majesty would recover, but that he would recover at no very distant petiod. What the House was therefore called upon to do was, to supply the deficiency—but to supply it foi a very short pe, riod. Many of the arguments, therefore, which had been urged -by the Honourable Gentlemen op • 'visite, and which might haVe justly leterred to the question, Ind it related to supplying the deft ciericy for a long pc riodiwere irrelevant to the present question. The two 'Houses of Parliament .by not calling on Miniaters to give in their seals and sym bols of office, had plainly shew n that they intended that those officers should continue to exercise the executive authority an their own responsibility, un til some controlling authority should be placed .over them. Well, it wits now proposed to appoint his Royal Higluiess the Prince of Walei to condut:.‘ the Government in his Majesty's name, with such powers as the twq liouses might think proper to..vest in him for that purpose. He uoiocided, with what was stated by the Nobte .rd who .-opened the discussion, that they. ought' to lay unit .of their consideration 41 mot Wes of a personal nature and he would therefore express his sentiments as freely as if his Royal Highness were to do him the honour' to consult him on the subje4t. His opinion was ,distinf.:lly, that' as the Regency Was to be created but for short time, the autho rity of the Crown 'ought not to be vested' in the Re gent; norcould he nod bkany referenee toParliainen taey history, that for a abort period, such full Powe r had ever been 'vestedin a Regent. Much stress that been laid on the precedent ot- the ACI of Philip and Mary; and it was said that'll) , that Act the Regent was entrusted with' the' full - powers of the CloWn until the Infant should become entitled to the, sec cession.' But in that case Parliament conferred the authority on the King, 'for - Philip' was he Kingl_ now, they were conferring it on .a- Regent, who was „, only the Prince of Wales. • The Act of' Successioe was adduced' as aoother . precedent in Whith. tench had beeh appointed with the full authority- vt : 1 1)e, Crown ; botAe, denied this. For instance, the Council of Regency on that, occasion were limited as to' the power of giving the, keyal Assent to' a Bill. ' And could any one suppose that in the in terval between the death of - Queen Anne and -the coming irt of George I. thc Regency could have: made Peers ? No' roan coal ente.ttion: such an idea. If ht went through all the precedent's which were irid on the 'table of the Holise of Lords in t7BB by a Committee of that Honse, •he should be able to sheet , that there was 'a siugte instance of Regency without ar limi , ation. It +vas clearly established in his mind, that the power winch ought to he given, was only that required by n , ?ces•-• shy, and what itec , s , ity was,there that the R. , :geia should have the power, ter a short thee, of stwkiiig Peers?' It was necessary that that :0... sec shuoin in the Royal Authority, but it was'not uccessary`ti_at it should be used t vt-ey day, e ery month, ur cv, ry year. in arguing the resolution ter, nett, g th e Household, he *mid ref , r to hi, ori ; ;;h1,11 p; ilarnety, that , be regu..ei••ll was 'or' ape Fr,- .hably short. If tie lie:;eht ywe c l.kt ly to b.: then it Inlet be ut3;talittry tut 0111) . w ti USt the itevot '' wlth the whole power of the State, but also•to co' skier whether fl irr ought net to be surrounded by all .- the Rplentlour of the State. Bet he could not bra why it was neeeotary that the Prince Regret at th' peewit day sheuld for a short time have a gretuv r r controul over the heusehold than George IL whe il Y• he. was Pi ince of Wales, possessed daring the, t it. months absence of Grote I. in, his foreiga nions. 4 '. , .oubted u healer it was ever in the eon' temptation of any tnan until the, present day, MI regent for a short time should hate any over the household at all. • He was little acatia'il t. ed with the nature of the household ment, but he was petsttaded that it !be House it view to g short Aegency undertook to. , sePil hat Household, an d to d ec l are whirr part of it stint' .belong to the "King, and' what part to " 14 Regent ' they would find it a task chtlicult to .perforne' unsatisfaelory when performed.. He allowed tint in whatever way the present situation ot the Gorrn''' 4 11 pent to a s considered, that consideration , A , a - s att e: with the s usation of v nod inconveintoo It was for the •House - to adopt that creme whiLit' peaied to them to be, under ell toe circuinsianceS the case; the least disavantageous. Mr. C. WyNNE, regretted that feeling had beellt m allowed to interfere itt the p resen t discussion. -16 % ought . 10 ake. Covenant witti thltmselvei 11°L I t. allow their affeations to.supersede theirjtrdyt'~ll+G. Deeply sensible as he - was of his. duty ti) narch, he was still more -deeply sensible 0 1 ", • duty to the Constitutor). In no former had any part of the Royal. Prerogative been ' , Aired. by -Parliament. It had been lodged in ` t ferent •bands,- but had alWays been allowed la 6 : e undiminished. .HC contended, that in the of Piitlip .and. Mary, Philip was only a tiulii i King 'and, with respect to t i l A o f Cievge when Prince of Wales,, wad.it be forgoteli I 'l l George I. - was in the full possessioe of ail fits 1 ' 1 1: ties, and drat he was at no greater distance Iria tha t kingdom titan Hanover ? It had been art thatonly two th .Peers erefo h r a e d i bee mi n matte ticont i i n ie l n i e le es l , a_st r.o l , L i i l t d ir and to- the Prioce ftem his beiog ed of toe Of making a 'Peer ,f or t.eeleamoort), As " 7 ' l might he be deprived of the pow& r of,nraking for a "Vt'lvernOntil, because a peace it at ilia ne', o made,fur the . last. foiir years. . But he doubte""!4 tad. Unless his m e n failed him, a 1:11lin. and most excellent person, for whom he ed the highest respect and regard, Lord 11 art .ners, had within that period been created a r' u f for the purpose of being. made Lord Cluteeellor_ii Ireland. The presont propOSition, wuu ld r estrein Prince of Wales in the choice of a Cnaticellari „ 1 1 Lord Eldon, Lord Ei,skine, or Lord Redesdakr "respectablehighly individuals. But, SUPP ° I g b rif 'loyal Highness should wish to make choir , other person —suppose be were to select his 11° e d and Learned Friend opposite, he would be restr a4l ,.,l from appointing hits, unless his Hon. and Le'i n. '';' ); Friend would submit to the iticonvetrietree --4 ":ij the grpat law 7 a4viser of the Crown—to bit the House of Peers, leaving the defence of hi' l w : j surer to his colleagues. But it seemed an es'eeloi n ` l i ii - this restriction way to be made' in livOtirofilitv'f -j i mietary men. ' Till new, the Peerage. had ire° ` 3 '. to be the rewaid of civil as well as of ii.intarY,''; rit. A Somers and a Clareuden, and in late a Hardwicke and a Chatham, had ,hewn honour had not been confined to military 51. 0 ; s ty For the first time en invidious line of distiadi 4 attempted to be drawn. The Hotiouribfe G', ll oo mat, contended, that the provisions thus ovid e- f iiiii but for a short. period. He (Mr. W.) h e3 ' e fo hoped it might be so; but it that period exte e d'only to six weeks, he should stilt tninnure diet the Royal prerogatiVes ought to renolalot;i, touched, and that the country, ought not in' bc tbated to Seeing , them abridged or diminished. i j !,,) . 'Mt. Secretarylivnett dectared,-that the on which 'he was indeccd to vote on the casion were drawn from the speech of the Ni , ? - ' t lation of 'the Hon. G ent l eman w hO Itt" 1 P%3 11 down, pronounced during the discussion' 1041,i";1. and 1789, and-publish e d soo n ' a ft e r t heft pec i !di speech replete -with d e pth o f re s ea rch, Ir. r'lll-1.14 of statement, and eloqueectiof orgurnetitat ioa• Honourable and Learned Friend conteededi when Parliament on former oixasiens bat' d' i jj. , ed any ot the royal authority they delegated How was This proved.? ',Because Parliament 04 , delegated the royal authority to a .Rcg °lP e 'ar Compattied by - a C o n ne d, was it !Lerch" t° b old seated that the Regent received the Royal aft unabridged ? What difference' was there be t l) re' giving the wh o l e aetnoriiy 102 Regent, t eO O. venting him from using it . without Ibe concurrive of a Council, and g i s i ng him ~a part of that alt.ecti ty, wholly unfettered. , If' the latter were a Lie of .the fundamental law of the Cen I° o o tner could be no l ess so . . Headt:erted i w t a t o t it precedents on the subject, and etritiendu - to te was established by them, that Parliament was its ~ttf A da ai m ies a rt t e t ii t tl t t e n t ew t c h ei ) I., i i g et, p to limit the delegation of the 8.,,Val ialtliOrilY th contended,: that difference of circoros , an"%tiit riod: of the Regeut.at the present than at -any 'Ural` a dh l iT: r ir t ) o ter th eti e t -11 .. 1 t°Btit)tr'i:llwiii:l o He dangers alluded . to. - ife'felt the , l• as 8 "", w 3, by rte o e i n u t e r n u i s l t s ttritiobli,tospeodw::rdeitpi rt;:i005): min. But still di - ern:tined to shown wa' A „,,%1,1 0 or- all of the restriettons for erne (tVel‘re",,lo .coutd , tics cripple enfeeble the theasurei oligilt 14 tt i,!ci, P'.olC necessary frit tne safety. He ‘CPP .. "ieriii i the Execotse Goverornen t ' l , : p -help considering the sUbjed to a 'tittfereld"' f „,1 of view. 'lt v. ROI wit that the re W L ' 5 ,4 11 ,..f ,yailttig system of discrediting the general con`/,' 1 01 the Representativ es ot the people.; a r 'sio s‘.wercd in, because those try' wliC;l3l it 01 ' 0 . P 4 ' - . 11 were h e y vilify the Iteri l e 'l(,, lives of the people bet they cotald con: lesigns , eatiiht rum. e6pit gown, is : 44) coal" „ I dl Wd it that House lake but by ;,10,1!.s t t be per yerted; Tru i t - 6 i nf l o w onii Mo.!le 11 , ° „ 0 ; :ai l l o c n e- t . ° i i f 4 11. 41 1 :6 ' . r kl id sj i tit : :.!:s i t ' cl, 4 ll. g iV ° : , t (i tiV t)ers t° 1, '1t7 ,1 . 1 64 :1 1 lilies tenting to destrueo e. lie could Ou t th , it Houle ac: tricot propo, d, they would lay ' 110 " 1. '" ° 10 10 grk%aiet Lei- 1 / 44: •e..critatteua ti4ta "111