The Sun. — London, England, 1811-11-19 00:00:00

ctit the punishrittint .lenatnralisation, and the Ins: of h; prop,lty and lionOurl-, ; the sitnPle . fitet of de s"ft:iiag Co itieor such paina, without' any sentence or &chi.; thin 'Whatever. 3 ' Th at the C 'plain s an d M asters o f P ortuguese 1 fails be hound 10 snake declaration, on oatis, the s that iffinals . theirnamed respeatve 4441) , r eally no:mg to theircrew, under a enalo'.ol 40,006 r e i n. p , 4 . Ti ti t t h e e onsuls of foreign nations oblige .the nxairii of foreign ships to give security that they will not carry away natives of this kingdom with- P,asiNtrts f rom t h e abov e Secretar i es o f Statc ; e 4 , 1 a Copy of the present cilia shall be .ivit to °' the said Consuls, signed by the lutendant nets! of Police. ; Lastly, that the Masters of foreign ships who o ut any Portuguese' without ht.! aboverneu trtipasspott, shall be to a 'flue Of 1000 cra " 'hequer ; that , the 44.1me1t plid into 'the . him who take them on ; board the liald N the toNet of Belem shall be conderuned:t o ti e chsof their boats, sails, &c. for a period of two and.that no one may plead ignorance : of the' ftpnt editi, it shall be published by the Int , ndant the l iCer both in this capital and in the provinces ; n ki d I ntendant being charged with the execution . bathe Sa lle, As well as all he Civil and Military nes au their sevelal_clepartments. • Sighed by the Fur Lords Goverhors of the K h%dom. C overnment, to, LI I. . , CATHOLIC DELEGiITES. DUBLIN, NovamßEß. 12. O s KING's BENCH. r• . ktv.,„i' e °Ming of this day, .Mr. - BORNE begged kitlt : the Court to alloW Mr. Perrin to mention n 1 Which bore on the question, and which be 13: 2 T r al, et with last night ; it was an Act of the "to. 111. chap. 52 it related to the city . ~Iterford. • iN4l.ntleourt having allowed Mr. Perrin to read it, and 'st to enact, that as freeholders were scarce, 1 09 P u blie justice retarded thereby, that other per knot freeholders, might be impannelled.. t t4 ;;E. Psti IN re asone d f rom t hi s; that as it was ne-4 °f;Pa have an ACt'of Parliament for. the town at'rford the law of the laud in general insist -14)1) Grand Jurors being freeholders : tlp,, t l 4g NA ILLY cited another 'statute to the same i ts tor the to.kti of Galway, 4th vol. Statutes, fir George 1.. • • t.t eork %Mee .DALY said, there `was' a similar one „alt. j„ 1 4D T , "lIN WIALY TOWNSEND then addressed the t e -; behalf of t h e C rown . c v Court declined pronouncing. Judgment this ikould the Bench' give their opinion until t:11 cite rott d ed into the various authorities which it —.....—.. . .n. C OURT OF KING'S BENCH,' Nov. 14. 4 tit 1 :ti ol , e !lief J us ti ce no t being able from indispo. iiii4l°4l tend the C o urt this days Mr. Juitice D:ty live IN that of cbur"se judgment t w ould;_ n he ot be tli iviw b t 'l ( the )a plea of abatement:, He sai d Ct i ';bruu ld not be deferred longer than to , v , ra ke q:' , ,Ritovvr., rose on the part of the delegates, Pltw ( ,:;, Court wheth e r or . not,in Ow event 'of'the' ttiol'‘-i.il'ver,ruled, a trial- would take' place. th i s d 4 , (1 1 w - : l ,,'' , llshould take place, be ielmbly hope ''s mi:hil 4 e4p o inted, iii order. that the Travpr , Mr. 4,:„' )e shtlioiently prepared. toll - met it.. VI akv a ,'? bA T. observed, that Mr. Burmwes iti i ;'"oal a trial could take: place irrstartter..-- ed T f r ," B ,,Pe, o to the time for :'reparation , which . was N ee ';'` ne would say, t: ';it every: possible. in I kr,'?uld be granted to the, Travorsers. . t t i the wki calculated upon' the indu lg enc e ..y fixe,pri) but it would ' be still Pleasant to have a k r. , , "Pon. w eld j4s tice 0 11BORNEt observed, that the trial kd a „ at , ariY rate take place and that this Term, k ' s 9ould be as remote from this as possible.. . N r Butt , .I . n my Lord, said i the, , ut,.....“ You 'h av e t ... , . Lo rd, said Air, j ,r" l would certainly take I) l2 ce "' ls '''' .. t my „: I ..' t i.ce 08 1101INE—.." I have certainly given I 1 14) 4 111 111 0 h 'hilt it would ; 1:- . have little-dou bt I Np ti ,, s ubiifa, but casu a lty may throw some in her ni n the W a e th at l am not aware of. How. 4 r h t s t ,a l; o a- in " vil l be settred le-morrow, when judgment Morn ......„ . . " a 14 . - --In addition to the five cases already (4 " Oe 1 ' e Court, the Attorney General. has filed k tit _ kir, I nformations against the folllowing per li:tarnoy : . )4 44 4 4 '1 ot Ping* for, presiding at an T he at Pi ihnirible-street, Aggregate on the gth of July. an Ndi a 411 of Fttigall (again) for that he being ),ilka,„l's°o person, presided at a Catholic Meeting ir gite 4 s 4 4l for the pnrposeuf apPointing. ll nt Y ef Me tt t he ° i It! H i , ~,,, 3 .), on-,-, j a ss is t delegates o nth of.4ogust , . tag at said kik' 'n'homas Barnewall, for I l ltr ' • 4'll t l iPn. Patrick -Barnewall, for a like offence. 'l),, w °o. Richard .Barnewell, and i 'l ' Josephß ll tor the same. p III I „ 1.„ arnewa. , • • . i. of T h e r 'oit ah r ,.`v 'ln fi eld Harvey,, Esq. Prepritto • . 1 0. 1 %. 411 18 1 jw irtiat, for publishing the Catholic pc k .4 6,, o , the ist of August.- ' . - pto l'cuatt rownsend, 'Esq. Barrister at Law, .44 of The Currestiondent, for publiShing th e prp eteditio, • 7 ~h . 1, , hit llATuttnAy—Nov 16. •• (' {i ttn, ll ',Y the C ourt of King's Bench pronounced e t h , t , 41141 ` °n the Ilemorrer to the two Pleas of t he . o' --- • - . W aSt as ustial, very much crOwden tl n etai ki, ( g t: 's takink their seats, the Attprney •l -, i l ttive " i s s ent fer..anetite tour Judges proce O l tN I°6r o Rinitinsfieriatirn. di ere CHIMP JUSTICE' said, !hat as .• "7 - t f i 10 Abatement put in by the Trilvr: s 'ka of which the Attorney General , had a I)etnurrer he ,would notice t 0 . I s -the Plea of want of Freehold one of whiciL be should first - notice -WO9, )111 weto not known to be.freenicil, nor E titl e ( l Proof 'ihai the Os' qtr t`S' of Dublin WWI cla;s corporato towns ; that t tt () f 16 CIE} of 0...1811t to 111.01 , 6,4 4, 14, this objettiOn could - not be entertained a moment. i f any proof necessary to be produced, that the clur,t was :sitting in the city of Dublin,.,would not bills of In ditiment fauna by the' Grand Jury of the, city of 'Dublin be Sufficient :—.the Plea itself, if not other. wise.sopported, would answer this objeaion, as re. -titimq the Indiettnent to be in the County of the • City of bublin. Another objection is, that they should possess certain qualifications as being proli et legates. The plea makes but one objection, that is to Freehold ers, -they ,have stated no other; cause' of Difiquali fications : it was then the duty of the Attorney- General to have brought proof, that these persons were freemen of the City of. Dublin, or that they were prubi :et legates. They might as, well have re- . (wired him' to bring Proof that the panoell had no minors, 'aliehs; or outlaws sworn on it ;, these `objec tions cannot therefore he entertained a moment. — The o'bjeEtioia relative to freeholds is' admitted to be a good one in counties at large, ,but not cities or corpOrrite towns ; but freeholders'erery where,must. :be probi et ' legrileF homines.—lt •is contended oh the part of ,the Crow)) that fteemen are pat el A.. galcs, and that this qiialification is general to all.— We should have expected from such great audio; lities as Coke, Rale, and Flawk!n, ,sOmething decisive on this sobjed ; but precision in opinion • ,is not to be found in thein. His Lordship then qUoted lisle 2, ,15.5, where he sap the Jurors must he freeholderS. This, he conceived,, only referred to counties at large. His Lordship then cited Hawkins :2. chap. 25, sea. 19, the 2 Statures of Edward, all which made e:.:ceptions in the cases of cities and boroughs --- he looked upon it that misdemeanours were to be tried by common law. His Lordship reviewed the authorities brought forwatd ify both sides, and commented on' them at length, and ended by stating that nothing had appeared to him as suf ficient to warrant the plea; his opinion therefore was, that the demurrer should be allowed., In this opinipif Judges DAY, DALY ; and OSBORNE concurred, but each .delive.ed their Opinions at length. ;As soon as the Judges opinions were pronounced, ,then Attorney;General rose, He said, as the dernim er eii ad been'alloWed, he begged of the Cohn to ap. a Agy, for the trial to go on ; he understoW it wa,s 'the a Awish of the traversers that no delay should, tak'e place, and be,hoped they, would not objet to Wednesday next.. The travetsers could not com plain that the delay which had taken place arose 'from any one but themselves; the bills might haVe been found on the first day of Term, and the triad might have gone on ere this. Mr. Buattovessr for the Traversers, expressed a wish that this Term should not escape ,ithout the 'trial'going on; but that he had witnesses to sum, mon froYia distant pars of the couhtry, and he fthopEd the Court would allow. a longer petiod thati day mentioned by the Attorney- Ge-' neral, that as to the delay it could not be said' to have 'arisen frorn,any frivolous Or - unfounded, cause:as must tie acknewledged 'When the 'solemn' deliberation that was given to the as by their Lordships was considered, and the solemn manner in which they had delivered their opinions seri'atim: It was;not an ordinary case, and he hoped a longer time would be granted—he mentioned Monday, se'nnight. • A conversatian here ensued lbetween . ;he Attjrner'-Geoet al, and the coun'Sel for: the Tra‘ersers, which ended in Thursday *text !)Ping • appointed, for the day of trid. The Attgill4- -Goneral then begged of the oiikr the High Sheriff 7o return nunierous Pannell` on that that no delay might ensue for want of Jurors. Mr.Comrnee, ye eerday evening, gave his intro dettery Le6ture on Milton and Shakespear, in buns trinket of, the principles of poetry; and their appli ennui) as grout - ids et criticism to the works of later And-of living Poets. Gratified as we always must be at seeing es' am of genius employed., on subjects worthy of him, and appropriate 'to his known studies,.we could not but feel pleasure at observing so respectable an audience, .and tOr a first Let lure, so numerous; We do not indeed know, whether , the word LeCture" is pot a misnomer ; as the greater, and certainly the most interesting and best-reasoned: part of the address was delivered from the impulse -4of the moment, as far, at least, as tbe language 'awl many of the happiest illustrationsare concerned. , For the thougles, and the learned arrangement, were as'evidently , the result of long premeditation and 'hatiltnal study. The Leeture, as was to be. expet9 edfrout an intioduelory One, was too miscellaneous. to allow us to give even a slight staterventof its cone tents; but we particularly admired the tnasterly, rice : cOunt of the aceidental circumstances which, in the present age, have e throWn obstacles in the way of a pure and genuine taste for the fine arts, the rage for violent excitement . (rpm extraordinary events, and whatever is glaring and prOminent, and even that more general diffusion of a certain quaff* tity of knowledge which, though lull of •promise tor the future,. yet, at inesent, gives the palm of re putation, to those who please .rho moat numerous clas4; not to those whose works satisfy the most in , telligent. The occasional digressions concerning modern Education, and. the true views of Poetry, as implying .itt turn an instinct after perfection unat tainable: in this lite, bet which yet, like all othei. instincts of nature, must somewhere, and at some. period, meet their appropriate object, were exceed ingly beautiful, and evidently dictated by alto feel ' ing , efebeenoment. Not, only (torn this Lecture, bet i irom mut former observations of the Lecturer at the, Royal Ipsteutinn, we.are impelled to recom mend Mr. C. to speak as much, and to read as little es possiblee Be appeared to refer to his notes. rather from natural timidity, which rapidly decreased after the first motnenis. What his, audience ma y have thought, we cannot say ; but assuredly we have seldom semi so roany pass out of a public room with countenancesoore alive or more expessive of warm interest . When it was intended, some years ago, to intro duce a real Elephant on Druty,Lane Stage. in a pro- SII ektumbi de.iied the late. Mr. Jeree seem, Nlecenekt to that _ Theatre, to look, at ope that we is Exeter -'Change, in order to determine whe tho it .as fit to bel added to the. company of • NeAraterse but as- the animal wits by no means a tine one of the kind, - jouseeree dissuaded Mr. SHERIDAN from engaging it, alleging that " he at 'any time make a better Eltphant than • • . Mr.TIZOTTE I},s tEPLYto the P.r.TYS IC 4 L-LVS, RELATIVE TO, THE ,DEATH .OF MR. VOX, WITH I'U 4.; THER PARTICI.JLA.y.S OF THAT LVLNT, IN A LI: TEE TO SIR RICHARDFHILLIiS. Y,. 1 1.;1t10w, Nov. 13, 18 ri. DEAR I was yesterday much sure' rised at seeing an the public Papers serve letters„ of Sir Henry Halford, an impretrytu of Dr. Moseley, and a statement of Mr. Tegart;Apothecary in tolitlon. Whate,ver feelings may have,beeri ruffled, mine have lint been respect ed ! And Mier all, Ihe,faCt of soMe'poweviel -me dicine (ii no(digilafis), having been •adatimstered, remains clear and undisturbed.. • . It is a bad argument, and an inefficacious way of surmounting facts, to advance, that, because one particular in a statement is erroneous, the whole is falsified. The body. of a facet may remain Intim!. peached, though a wrong feature - may have been ascribed to it. An honest witness may mistake in some part of his testimony, where he could, not have positive knowledge, and yet his account of Leis be quite indisputable. In medicine, above all,' in that region of uncertainties, ditkrent remedies, may have the same operation, may Lace effects to tally the reverse of what may reasonably be expect ed,--may either have too little,, too MuCh, or tone at all, according to the actual state,—t he constitution *of the patient,—or the 'nature of hia'clisease. All.these onsitiens I apply to the questioo of the sudden termination of. Mr. Fox's disc Ise. Although unceremoniously attacked on the isol..ted point of :the digitalis by direct contradiction, and on thege,, neral question by sweeping assertions, and although no kind or indulgent ceasttuction has been afforded. , to my motives, in writing with the honest hold-' ness of truth, I shall endeavour calmly, ohilo.ophi catty, and I hope logicallY, to discuss the point in the manner in which I know Mr, Fos', himself would desireso be done. I will 'supPotte;rhat the 'digitalis was not given ; and will premise also, that so far from conceiving that I had said any thing in„the first edition of the: Memoirs, injurious to the characters of the medical 'gentlemen attending Mr.FoX, that I considered was stating a t'adt, for which no blame could or ought to. tall upon ,theoi, iii. a medical twilit of view, . I gave theloestion of prolonging Mr. Fox's ex istence: a philoiophical and political turn, but did not allege that physicians were expected to view„ things like statesmen however - I might have dc.- „ sired the .rare combination of medical and scien tific qualities, with statesman-like contemplation, in the case of Mr. Fox: I . always described the conduct, of Mr. Fox's physicians, the intellignoe and buthanity i f Sir If Halford, the unclouded itt;elleCt Of Dr. Pireairo, at the hattest zeal of Dr.Moieley ; ,ner can I raver forget the promptness end atfeCtionate cor e o f S a v o rs Hawkins; :nor is the respectable assiduity and attention of Mr. Tegart, the apothe cary, to be passed over in silence. 'Lord Holland's vind....atory testitnotty in his published letter was little requ,ral for at all, or any of these re speCraoie, characters ; in my Mind it, is derogatory to them, because no defenee was•required, or, it it were, hot Lordship Was, as he seems to allow, an imperfect and incomp , tent evideoce. , The digiialif,' . 4ay the physician and Mr, Teas r t , was never administered ; therefore Mr. Trotter's opioion is unfounded, and he has unwarrantably gi.en pain to Mr. Fox's friends, and done injury to the chsratters of the. physicians; ,and Lord Hal hind sanctions this defective syllogisin, by attesting its accuracy. Sir Heory Halterd,- in his first letter, (for he writes three in. an official manner) of the 29th of Oct'obe'r, to Dr. Moseley',—aboot a month 'atter the publication of the , Memoirs,. says, " I belleie that the digitalis was never ,admioister ed at all in 'Mr. Fox's case;" and again, " vc e prescribed no other remedies than cordials ;" tool in his letter to Lord .Holland, " nor was any other po tent marine of ,doubtful efficacy administered to him, by.which his dissolution - could possibly be ac celerated. At first there is uncertainty as to the di• sitalis itself, though the sameletter advances,. that nothing 'but " cordials were prescribed." How this uncertainty as to the and certatnfy as to twitting but cordials having been, prescribed, coN respond, it is not easy to reconcile, unless Sir Henry meant by *.‘ cordials" something more " potent" than they commonly are supposed toke. , Shouldi put the question liereir-,•May not a 'tonic" be so potent" as to over-act upon' the system ?- ,, ;-and by too mualy. tension subsequently occasion too much depression, tenditig to accelerate dissolution May not a tonic" thus have had cf leas somewhat similar to those of digitalis? If these questions be answered in the affirmative, What was so offensive in the hypothesis, as to the digitalis? To give another, and yet.not unfair, di rect ion to the argument, may L not ask, why rso va luable li life as that of Mr. Foi was abandoned :to , cordials and palliatives? In short,. WHY DIOITALIS WAS NOT MVOS ? rhis will be a difficult ques tion to ;tomer ! I put it, however, to these gait tlemen in the presence of the whole scientific and medical wOrld - ! If it serve some purpose at, this moment, fur these gentlemen in deny, the use_ of dio o llatii I conceive I should he warranted by °the' Of the first authority, in Medicine, in, asserting its known etlicacy in:the cure of escites oliort, in 'asserting that if it had been given, the life of Mr. Fox might have been saved ! This, however, is a medical question, which I leave in the hands of the doctors. I out it thus, however, not only became it is a question fit to be answered, but to chew o rtiat I attached rso blame to the use of digitalis as sash, and that the tendency of, my argument lus iseetx at rangely , pereer t ed. , I now proceed to , a more minute statevent,of tl!Cis On this Stlbjea than the Mr COOI94ICti, an, indeed, in toady other instances, I have also said much kss titan was in my power to do, front a dis position to avoid -giving paw A future and more distant period may*convince trydetraders of this ; for, Whatever others may feel ioc„lioed to do, I can not a ornpromise the gt nodeur or Mr. Fox 4 s charac! tor for tie petty itHereSlS of'party. '.Those are but the ephemeral (strict% of die passing,hotir s—that, as matter for posterity, and, like the ter.es of Humer i , every fragment and toinutit particle should, be ga thered np . ,.and boond together. The second operation of tapping occurred on the 31st of August. Mr. Fox ,trooped at'first, bot, in a day or two,. as has been noticed, wonderfully re. Med. His, - spirits and looks well; g0c..4. Tito most 'strengthening nourishment was .given . t rend to birn a greiir de l ; 'a'ppeared to the co v,9sqtion of Lt,! :f usual, whose alt 7 were unienntiing. I think aim. period bet ty, : iheopecation an INIT. Fox's de ic e _ se, may be cii.t ted, into three that,. Three days to allow for the, convalescence after ta on !ricr,,....— s ix' o r sewn, ..ce inter - I/al of ccuiparatr. ~ad three, as the last stage of the period. In the first t Mr, Fox. was low and' wenk,...in the second be roVived, not however without suffering;, and Feint;good cleal; from the continued flp , a'ing of the water, oc casioned by his disorder... .Sir Henry Halterd, himself, .mistalies„ when ho says,"the fluid accumulated rypidly second pun6tiuring ;" as than tact w4s, that the orifice of the,punchireldid not close, and the water, instead of accnmUlating, , avas discharged in this way. It was upon this. cireemstance I founded my opinion, that Mr. Fox's existence might have been prolong- . eel, fur the , discharge from, the alnico - prevented the grievousness and danger : of accturrula t ‘ i an, though it must be.admitted it tended to weaken him. How. ever, his. appetite , was very good. this middle pint of . the pet iod,. and he slept a t,reat , defil; matters very much calculated to sustain Min ,a :conaitierable . • tdd.not. - venture to say, that by keepieg open the orifice, and leaving nature to work, any great lepgth of time might have been gaiiied.; but per- , Laps acme might have been. I understood, that in some cases the Orifice has been kept open for years, and the patient has been occasionally retieVed.as the water gathered ; but I cannot presume to say this might have been Mr. Fox's complicated case, as the efflux of water was very.great ; but I conceived that the circumstance of flowing instead of accquiu.. after the second puncturing, must' retard or • prevent a speedy decline, if natwe'were left very much to itself. The last part of the period b: ins three days (or at the utmost . four) is: that in which a remarkable change, in, and the dissolution of Mr. , Vox took place. A consultation was held, in the beginning of this division of ahe period, and I. certainly understood, (and imagined I had gathered) that the physicians had determined rtt ,making a new effort to counter. 'ad, or pOwerfully to correct, the disorder.. I was tOld a medicine was to be sent, which ,was to be administered carefully ; and which medicine carne on the evening of the day of the coosultation. This I supposed to have been (he digitalis ; it now appears my idea,. as . to that particular medicine, was erroneous. • The fist quantity of the Medicine , I was directed to give early in. the morning, when Mr. Fox awoke. This I necessarily delayed, as he .slept very calmly, until between six and seven, when, it was adinieistered,..,. end it was to be continued at certain intervals, Flowofren he received it, I can. not : preciaely, state f . , but the diredions of the. phy sicians ,were faltbfolly adhered to by Mrs. Fox and myself, till a remarkable change took place, which particutarly relate., Mr. Fox was so :wen as to be : standinc,r, near a bacon stand, hating Washed his face and heeds, and was cleanieg his teeth, when a sudden sickress and weakness spreai over his frame, and his tenance changed.' I 'vas - beside hint, and had la,. , en reading to ht.h Johnson's Lives of the Poets, and was much shocked at this change. supparted him, With very wear difficulty, to the bed, whien he left but, little afterwards. He 'gave no eiein;on .as to any medic* he had received, but had been edger . to take the one in questitie, Whe ther Coin a hope ihat.it might work a considerablo change for the best, or from ant inclination of itd nature made to him, or from the coinmon anxiety • ill invalids to receive any Medicine which May 're lieve, I cannot pronounce.' know he was very de sirous to take it ; Laud, fur the first and only time Lin his dines's, was disianisfied at my having allowed him to sleep, rather than awake him to it. lie certainly reasoned a great deal on his own case, and was sanguine in his hopes, till be sickened in the manner I have described. No person was in the room, when this remarkable change took place, but myself; and my readers Will not find it diffi cult to grant . , that my conjeCture that digitalis had been admintstered was not at all an unreasonable One, though it was unfounded. The assertion, of Sir Fzenry Halford, that no " potent' medicine" was giVen, " by which Mr. i• Fox's dissolution could possibly be accelerated„: atl though the Arthecary, fresh from his prescription book, declares the medicines given were ". tonic and cordial," andc4bat every. ,person of comnion • Sense must know, -4 hat a " tonic" must be some. what ." potent," or that it is no fe• tonie,"l avow is very surprising to ma., considering the fails and citcurnsainces• which I have related. The word tr patviiVy," gnus so very far, that, all my reaped : for the talents and virtues of Sir Henry Halford cannot • prevent the from exercising the humble privilege-of doubting. I cannot surrender my judgment and reasoning facultiea to this declaration against poi*. Gaily, because it goes too far, and almost trenches . on 'tie unerring attributes of the Deity. The thecary's words, that the medicines were , given. " 'solely" with ty view of suppotting leis (Mr. Fox's) strength, are less strong, .but Tore convincing' tett thnony, inasmuotr'as they admit the posslh i li l y or untoward results, but vindicate the intention and, motives. Dr. Moseley , says nothing, except to deny • the admioistering of digitalis, 'The lase Dr. Pit.. cairn cannot now* heard. Thus Sir' , Henry 2Hal. , Curd's is the only positive testimony, and that goes t tai, The facts rem aj n insuperable and unaltera. ide. Atl alibi has been Mink) ,out for the digitalis, hut the merits of the case are untouched by the cur* reapondence. t . This staterhent must she that neither Sir Homy HallOrd's letters, nor the Apothecary's Watt,- mot, are concluaiveon the Point they wished to decide in so L summary-ti manner' ag - Mist me, and t Hat who her the digitalis was tiall)iliiSit'red' or, not. the facts which I Barn brought for , vard airs instiper. al4lo eyit.kni:e of a sudden termination of Mr, Fox's disorder,.not to he accounted tor, but by the Opera f Lion of,the giedietne he took two days o,fwe Its cleanse, wh4tever it may have been, Very t j rn a l l y l , l, d yoU el t obli~;ect Servant, Twe!ve persons found in the entity's service when rare Isle of France surrendered, are on board the Enterprise tender, off the Tower, waiitag i heir trials, which will take place At the ensuing Admiralty Session 9.