The Sun. — London, England, 1804-11-28 00:00:00

LAW REPORT. ICOURT'Ok KkNG's 13U.NCH, Nov. 27. At nine, o'cl , ck this morning. Lnrd ELLENEO - at sst Ctlitiihall, where verdias were taken in a few uudeferuled ; and at eleven his Lordship rproceeded 'to Westmibster Hall. The btulnes.; of the. hearings opened with the judg. meta in the casetof WYNNE 1). RAMPS ; in which the decision went for the Phictiff. This determi. nation has established, that the acceptance of a . ..Ell! of Exchange. by letter, is sufficient, although the letter he addressed to the Drawer, and no communication be made of such intended honour, to thelohler nf the bin. THE KING V.,PIUMPHRIES. This Defendant had been tried and found guilty of riotcosly assernhl'ng in the city of Chester, with others; to rescue a man that had been impressed:; and the fats of this tumultuous proceeding, both on the nccasion of the , trial s and antecedent to it, being fully stated to the public, we shall not now repeat them. During the reading of the report, an tl , e pleadings of the Prisoner's Counsel in mi., Ligation, the Defendant was suddently seized with an epiirptic parniccsm, tinder the influence of which lie c minuet! some time after the hearing of his case - bad been concluded, so that he could not he immed'attiv removed. Aber the :.ffidavits were read, in which almost all she Nilagistra , es of the city at Chester jOined in detosing to the general good behaviour of the De. fenciant, Mr. •C-Lvve addressed the Court in his behalf. He should tint complain of the verdia of the Jury, but. he was convinced their Lordships vios , la see, that immediately after the Defendant had cormnitted the offence lie was sensible of its enot. tniq , , at a .avaited himself of every possible ex. Make teparltion for its commission. L:rd FLLF NuOROtIGH—" The nfrenCC enor. mins, I‘,llt it serMS mulch diminished as posaittle by the subsequent contiu!l of the Deten.lant, We Most consider of the case "MIR to-mrtrro'w, and in ti e'rrt•itO time he lutist he eorninitted." • ATTOteNEY-GPNERAL geeing thedistreoting sitniiti , o 0 die .befendttn , , observed to the Court, that he helieved die purposes of justice would be art efrean.dly 'promoted by his continuing at large, and then tote he assented to his remaining under the care of his friends until the kentence 0 -- e the Court thould ht: pronounced. Tric'Tipstaff insttooly withdrew, and in a short interval the man was ~ u fficittitly recovered, with the assistanc,e of the Officers of the Court, to re. sire. Tfir KING V. =OUTHERDEX. We l a rdy 'suited ghtf4 Cabe, when the Defendant being I. 'tight uo r 0 receive sente;.ce, rifr. BUR ROUGH moved in arie.t of, judgment on two gri.unils: first, that an offence must be provea, which Was the fit olje& of a prosecution ; that the mdictment for 4,ne'.l an offence must make the 'cliarge.witl , such a degree, of legal pre cisom that the nature of the crime must, in alt its 3r(4, hP cortetly distinguished. "ne• iVrTortNPy.GENttitAL resisted this Rule. He said, the vtrflice of the Defendant war perfealy &sof tr m , he crime of the person in this case setting the medicine s without the legal stamp. The of ice here ~ah not against the Statute,. which had for its ohjedi the protraion of the Revenue, but it w; the eftin of extortion. If a Countryman were in - 1,01-tclon i;r) a b,isternits day using a parapluie, and he were toltl by this Defendant that it was , l . . Opf (Meno an existin g Statute to empl i 2y this de. fesce ;tgaino the inclemency Of the season, lest he sh o ulo blind -half His Majesty's Subjetts in his pro. out the Defendant were to add to this re. in ,rk, th a t a prosecution Would..be Commenced nainsr this peasant, from which he could he re. lieveti by d dOriaoOn of 10 1 * ; under thin circum, stances, the A1T.04 EY•G E ILA!. contended, that although' no Statute was violated, the extortion alone would tender the Defendant responsible to the laWs.ot his country. Mr. .It slice LAwastic c•-•-" The 30th Gen. n.' tivule a letter dirctit , l to another, threaten. i ng a prnsecul i on , o ff•nre against law, to be punishes! by One, .itnittiv)!lwnt, or teansporta. thin. I wish to know, if, iletote that Statute, threatenings, accompanied by nu conspiracy, were a etimc ? AvraßNty ZENO 41,-u Yee, my Lord, CAsN ;1p,,„! nn the,..,b;,,k, of this' kind under the circutn‘ Irces or charging an unnatural 1.• rd ELLEtssoaoucis.--" Yes, because, in th',e - cases, there is a felonious raking. The offence of w elling, medicines wilhour" a stamp, is punishable only by penalty. Is this then more than threatrois.g to bring an anion of debt This - is nut Inc obtaining money upon false pre. tences, uoutt the Statute' diteled to that specific pesq they were instructed to give ment that the nist(cr ahuuld thus subsitie ; and although Lord Darnley was governed by no vindiaive motives, ordinary prudence required that he should not relin. quish the expedient to which he had resorted fur his owt, per, , mal honour soil safety. • Lord EL LitNioROVGIII.•..-. 4 We have endeavour. eel to give the ni. , st lenient construction to this af hit., and yet it dues appear, that the Defendant still brooded over the old grievance of the year 'Roo. In such a case as this, Lord Darnley has a right to the protection of the Court in this summary nay. I should have been glad if the proposal had been met by the parties in the form I recommended, but we have no right to carve out for them terms of reconciliation. No doubt his Lordship will be advised, in the future stages of this business, to do whatever is. most honourable to himself, and to every branch of his family, bit under the present circumstances he is ent►tled to have the Rule made absolute." crime." TISC ATTOILN2Y.GENVRAL...—" This is a view OF the caw rertetily new, and not within. the C 1354 of ol•jedions stated hy my Learned Friend. Your 1/mloly will, therefore, pedlar, think it re.t,nuThle that I should take time to conhider." Luca ELLE NDOitOUGII.. , -;" 1,0 it stand aver.,' THE KING v. BLICR. We mentioned the Rule granted to chew cause, in consequence of tite violent dispute that arose be. tween this Defendant and his relation Lord D a m_ ley, at an inn at. Uckfield, anti we likewise inform_ e d our R e ,ders of the terms of actommodatien pied under the authority of the Court. On the Motion to make the Itule absolute, Mr. ADAss ex. pressed his utter astonishment at the instruaiona_ she Learned Counsel hail received to proceed in the r a i i r. H e u n d e rstood it was agreed nn all bands, that his Client should himself, with sufficient sure. ties, giv'e security for his peaceable titille.lllol* to. wards Lord Darnley, anti that the Court would not be required further to interpose. Messrs. EasEtNe and CARROW, at considerable length, compared the Affi tavit of Lord Darnley, OM of the Defendant, and contended, that the ag. gression was of too serious a nature to he fussed ove r with so little ceremony. They said, their Learned Friend was' wholly mistaken if he sup. N 001'4 s Printed r y ICNA at, HA 4;5, (0, Nu. 9, Martiet. , coutt. lirsw.treet) ; and Punlistled by.W uA le Seal rr k, (of Snutb.hiottou-stri At flit Stirt.Orvlcs i No. ii 2, &rand ; where 4civrrritswevri, Ordm for the Paprr, Lettru for the Edirtor v &c. (soa4p;l), n A shocking accident happened at Dowlais irnn. works, near Merthyr Tidoil, on Saturday seri. night :—The regulating chain of the engine at nerths lower mill broke, which rendered the machiy unmanageable, and the fly -w h e el breaking in con. sequence, caused the death of three poor women who were employed in weighing iron scraps, besiaet much injuring a fourth. On the 9th inst. Mr. Richard Hart, coach. maker, of Wimbourne, Wilts, called at the Bank there to desire payment of a Draft ; immediately after which, it is supposed, he felt himself ill, and judged that a little brandy would relieve him, Ire went to a public.house to ask fur it, hut be ! fore he could drink it he fell down, and instantly expired. THE EtNG V. BOURNS. Mr. WOOD she wed cause against a Rule obtained by Mt. ER UK I NI, at the instance of Lord St. Vitt. cent, for a Criminal Information against Mr. Bourne. He read an affidavit from Mr. Bourne, who deposed, that he had never heard of the Pamplilet'entitled Audi alttram Partem, till his return from Ireland, and that es to the Pamphlet entitled " Naval Ad ministration," lte had only endeavoured to secure the suppression of that out of regard to Lord St. Vincent, who had done him afavour. This was hit • motive for shewing it toMr. Tucker, after he had, at a considerable expence, secured its suppression. FrancisWilliamßlagtion,Eh*alsonsakan affida v it, from which it appeared that he %'as the Author 91 the Pamphlet • entitled 4 , Naval Adrninistration,", bot knew nothing about the Pamphlet entitled " thafittl. 'teram Partem," thutigli the latter:containe.d a great . part i nt . what was in the -tomer, which must have happened by copi-s being taken becietly trom the ptinting,ffize. Mr.Ftet.ot No, the same side,w h Mr. WOOO, urged there.. b , hility thar.same sheets, had het'. .-curly conveyed front therintyst. , trice, where there ‘t ere u sraeters who , wett rps miao, devils. / and others more di.ehnlicsi tho,e who went by the above appe:lation. lie confessed that at hrst,considerable subpici on might 14, 4 1, e arisen, and in France they might hive ginflottne I a man on no better evidence, anti the liaisition would have r o a sted him But in this Country rio min was con demned on susincion, and this was fortunate, be. Cathie the Defendant in this instance had cleared himself. Mr. ErisKiva endeavoured to maintain the Rule. He differed from hi.B learned friend Mr. Fitt LD I NG. In France any ' , mon who published a libel against Lord St. - Vineenr would not he guillotined. On the contrary, such a libel would be an ample protetlion to him. The Court, however, ordered the Rule, to he discharged as far as it resneded Mr Swine, and to be made absolute against Budd and Sidney. THt ICING ti. BLAGDON. Mr. je "Nis moved for a Criminal Infortmtion against Mr. Mid" whl had confessed himself the Auth-r of the Pamphlet called "Naval Administra. tion.” The Court, however, thought that there was not,a su ffi cient publication of the libel for them to interfere. It might, however, go before a Grand Jury.— Rule refuted. Three cases were decided, by which it was settled that carriers were not obliged to be answer. able for goods, unless. specially. committed to their care; that a promise to accept a Bill of Exchange is binding, though made without the knowledge of the holder of the bill; and that the custom of oblig- ing every new copyh Id tenant to enter in the Court of the Lord of the Manor, is A good and reasonable custom. INFOAMATIoN, ItiNG *V. LOWTHLit. Mr. Qin ss moved for leave to filea criminal In. formation Against Mr.Loultber,a Gentleman of Wilt. shire, tot improper conduct to the Magistrates of that County. He made the application on the part of Lord Radnor, Mr. Byres, Mr. Henry jacoht• and Mr. Batton,. who were Magistrates of Wilt. shire. The circumstances that led to this of. tence, were as follow : Mr. Lowther, the Sheriff, had employed a person of the name of Soap tb dig -well for him; but notbeingsatisiml with it, he re. fused to pay theman for his labour, The man - applied •to the MagiStrilted, who issued an official warrant to the Sheriff to answer to the demand. Mr.'Low titer, in reply, wrote to Mr. Batton, stating, "that the Magistrates might have chosen a more retpeet# fol manner of communicating this affair to him, in. stead of issuing an Oficial warrant, especially as the matter had been mentioned at the last Quarter See. lions, .when the Magittrases very properly declined to interfere. It was improper to attend to the ap plications of such fellows,, or to. issue warrants at their request, when the ; IWO refusal of #,Gpticniart to pay was a proof tliat nothing was owing,'' The Magistrates, somewhat doubtful whether they had a competent jurisdittion, deferred any further proceedings till the meeting of the Quarter Sessions, when they conferred together, andwere clearly of opinion that they had a jurisdinion in this affair. Another summons was therefore sent to Mr. Low. ther, who, in reply, wrote to the following died to Mr. Batton ta,—After what I formerly wrote to you relative to this affair, I thought pin would have ,perceived the'propriety of io declining to Interr:chile in it, and maul should hear nothing., turtbei about the matter. I was therefore considerably sur prised at receiving another summons, about an attidr so en tirely out of your, joristlielion, that I must conclude your . conduit to have proceeded either from your want of ability todischarge the dirties of your situation, or to have been de signed as a personal insult tome. - I beg to know in which of these lights lam to consider it. In the mean time I shall take such steps as the law &redo. (Signed) G. LOWTIIER. The Learned Counsel observed, that if Magi. mates were to he insulted in this, manner, it would be impossible for them to do their duty. .. Lord ELLENBOkoIIGH.—gt Take a Rule.!' COURT OP COMMON PLEAS, Way. a 6. DAV, z., DIODY. This was an Idiot) cite the case tried at Warwick A s zes. The Plaintiff's horse was, taken in dis_ tress for the assessed taxes. The Plaintiff, con. ceiving he had nn right to pay them, replevied hit horse, and proceeded to trial ; but it being a case of considerable importance to the wbtle constable wick, is was agreed that a special case should be sent to the Court of Exchequer ; but, not being in regular form, that Court declined to give their opi. Mon upon it, and it was sent into the Common Pleas. Sixteen persons were appointed by the Commis. sioners under an Mt of Parliament to coiled the assessed taxes in the constablewick of .Bordsley, Witton, and six other hamlets, specified by name. Two persons were chosen out of each hamlet, and, it had always been the custom for these two to col. left the taxes in the hamlet in which they resided, and never had any claim upon the inhabitants of the neighbouring hamlets, but allowed each of them to be eolleeted by the collettors chosen from, and more immediately belonging to, their respective hamlets. Gabber, the Collator of Witten, having made default in his last payment, an order issued from the Commissioners that the constablewick was liable, and that all the hamlets should contribute to make up the deficiency occasioned by the default of the hamlet of Wilton. The Plaintiff, Bars, resid. ing in the hamlet of Bordsley, was distrainec}, and by this, means the whole question came before the, Court. Serjeant VAvcit.or, for the Plaintiff; argued, that there was no constablewick in England named in the manner this was named in the appointment by the Commissioners; that it way called the con stfhlewick of Bordsley alone, and not the Contra blewick of Witton, Bord,ley, Etc."&c. ; so. that it muss have been evidently their intentton to subdi vide the constablewick into eigit parts, or' ; and to appoint two persons to tolled in each distriB, independent of each other, and, of course, not responsible 'for the taxes due by any other dist riE. Serj:ant BAILEY, on the other side, maintained • that one At and app.inttnent by the Cotivnissioners under it, meant nothing else but the entire consta. bliwtck "of 13 'Risley though the different hansiets constituting it were specific lily named; antfundoubt. adly every hamlet must be liable, as each person was appointed to coiled in they constablewicle of B.)rdsley only; that the Commissioners, in 'appoint. ing them, had made use of 'a more particular name than the contabletvick of Bordsley.. Sir jAMOS MANSt I it.LD said, he did not believe the At empowered the' Commissioners to appoint more "than two Colletints in each distriCt ; so if they meant, as his brother BA 1 La v said, to applint the sixteen Collectors of the constablewick of Bordsley, it was contrary to the ASR of Parliament : he was sorry it was not brought forward in the Court of . Excliequerovhich, to him, appeared to he the proper place for it. Serjeant VAU4I AN, in support of this argument, cited a' case from first Burrow, where five overseers of the po •r were appointed instead of four, men. tinned in the Att. It was decided by Lard Y I FLD, that the number mentioned. in the Act should he Adhered tn. From which, he argued, that the Commissioners had no power to appoint more than two to any one district, and of course could not intend that these sixteen were, in coin. Colleelors of the constablewiek t,f Bordsley, but that they meant to divide it into eight districts; a pp o inting two to each, totally independent of each other. Sir JAMBS MANSFIELD thonght sixteen too many to coiled in any one place, and it seemed to be the intent that two should collect in each hamlet. — Ordered to stand over. SDINBUNGII, Nov. a+. COURT OF sFssfoN. On the t 6 h inst. ;the Court dCteimined a curious and imp , briant question respeding a wager. hi May 1797, two Gentlemen had entered into a con. tra6l, regularly written and executed upon stamped paper, that in case, at any time in the course of ten year., the' value of tool. Sterling in '3 percent. con. sols should rise to above 701. Sterling, the one should pay to the other iool. Sterling, with interest, after the rime should fall due On the other hand, the other ,party was to pay tool. Sterling if the 3 per cent. consols did not rise to 701. in ten years ; and both parties hound their heirs and executors to perform this agreement. One of the Gentlemen died, and the other, the present PUrsuer, when the 3 per cent. consols ruse to 701. brought the present aElion ogiinot the brother and heir of the deceased Gentleman, who admitted he was heir, and liable for the payment of all his brother's just debts. It was contended, on the one hand, that this was a gaming wager, and no aCtion could lie,upon it ; it was contended, on the other hand, that this was not irgatning wager', such as horse.racing, money lost at earths, dice, See.. but. a fair contract. The question came before Lard. BANNATYNII-, Ordinary, a hood, wh that " the Contraft libelled was nut akttiiitiabte in this •COurti and asitailxied the(De. fender." . The Lord Ordinary after,wards or.dered informations, and reported the case to the Court, wherr their 1. irdships found, that the contract libelled un is nut antonable in this Court ; and there. fore assoilzies the Defender, and finds the Pursuer liable in expences." Last week some villains contrived to rob the warehouse of Messrs. Ormerod and Davit}, in High. street, Bristol. They watched an opportunity when the shopmen were engaged, and, contrived, by sniping the line of a stish.window, to throw it up without being discovered, and cArried of several pieces of goods of considerable value. On Wednesday last the fAlowing Inquests were taken before Mr. Tarr:a, one of the Coroners for Gloucestershire, viz. At Easington, on. view of the body of Robert Clark, who had for some time la boured under great anxiety of mind, and hanged himself in a hay.lofr at that place; and, at Kemp-. ford, on the body of Catherine Cowling, widow, Avliu had, a few days before, come with her family to that place, from Siddington, and diuwned her_ acct in the' ThaMes and,Severn Canal, deliberately leaving *lier cloak on the bank. Verdict, in bsth cases, LlMar.y. SHIP NEI'S. CRAVRStmIa, NOY. z 6. Passed by —the Resat: tion, Frazer, tr , Lahrsdore; Prink of Wales, Young, and Ann, Grant, 'from Arctiangcl ; l e" , SPilker, from Bremen ; Harmony, Diltglei and Att tumn, Sacker, front Dantzic ; flannah, Maille,.lrom Leart Nickolas and Maria, Fcrittes, and jonge !brines, Amsterdam. Sailed—the Juno, Clarkson, and Blenheim, Millet, f°t Grenada: Albion, ole, for Antigua; Rosalia, Felp wort, and Princess of Wales, Etiring, for Tobago; St. Vincet ' t Bale, for St. Vincent's; Grace, Trailer, Alfred , Christie) Dominica, Greenleaf, cur d Jonah, Cummings, tilt: fatil#o? . _SIRIUS. , On Saturday last, at Cl )ptun-Honse, Warwickshire, the Lady of John Cothet. Esq. °la San. e m a y . r Lately.' at Pcnrice Code,. Glantorganahire, Lay '' 4 ' ' Talbot, of a I).,u4hter. of iS cl O ri Tuesday setutight, the Lady or I.lid 1.11,th,e, and licit. ' • -- ' —... . „ . . , . . AtIRRIEI). On Monday thc z6th inst. at. St. George's Church, 1 1411 . ° :. ver.stpitre, ' i I. CI: i (.. tpt.t.tl to Miss Maria Smith, n f Slo3ne.square,,youtigest daughter 6, the Lite Peter Smut', F.sti.. of Ely, Canibrirlgeshirc. ' Last .reek, at Carmarthen, William Moigaii, Esq. Mayor of that - Borough. to Miss Harries, of the same pf.ice. , Oh Thursday last, at D a ikeith-Hotise, Lot'! Nl , .huu c r"' the Hon. Miss Douglas, e1d.: , 1 dati4liter of Lord Duittllluuudi as, Yesterday, at Faversham, Mr. laverl--- of ---'—a. ditch, to Miss Elizabeth folly, of sharn. On the 26th DUD. '1.1311-141CssaDn711°y11,11nasrits.Sqtaltttotnhe. ißillaSh:trPrey°,fagiqe:r6wti.ciMilsr.Plaile: tr oßrNesfeoectsv)oknime,nisaltutannehrtleesdet47o9:tatihLtraleedsuyticleia.aarrittioeoirtis:Edirts4racnAry.,:rx:Gilittiadnirdel.tetste: mtorsl.l sleivrienjesst,ylA; ON Mttnda sennight, at ShAtesbrook-House, 13.:rks, thur Vansit ta rt, Esq. one of the Vollerers of Windsor ro lately, at Fleet, near Plymouth, jrnat Bulteel, Esc! , , 'A few days since, at Storehouse, hi rs. Aldhim, the LAnr Ciptain Aldhant, of the Nautilus Sloop of %Var. Ottof Sunday the t.tlt inst. at his Parsonage.house, the Beiminster, near ErhipoDri, lorse piitctsahtr of e c4 We.,,thilrbtlrY will' l it a e t t e v )i . s l o y r re d F ie x a t e o ri t r e . of M O aunt t h e° irse PRICE, OF STOCKS. Tiststo£l. Hank Stock, 167 :66k B lia St o oc i l,. Navy ; per C to i 5 per Cont. 1797. 9 Exchequer pr, is. rils. 1") fper Cent. OmniUnl. .71 0 t of 4 per C ent. 74 t piis Cent. erry ,f per C e nt. K e a. iiik imperial per Cent. Cent Can 4 3,i 1)1110 Ann. 9 ank Long Ann. 1.6 Is. totals' coitsop-nnig, 59 531 . 05 ..........,....................-___ T „ - _,.......- FROM THE GLASGO W, couittea • . , Of Tuesday, November t3i• ISO; N°"ITHS'IANDING the grist demsnl for the ANTI - IMPETIGINES,• or SOLOM.,("oId. DROPS, wnielt arc so estimable for purifyi.ng t,he oi. there are s r ) mai)? Creditahlt attestations of their ellteaeY, _, *armor . omit the insertion of f.irther testimonies of their never . failing intliicii:e over diseases which baffle every othe r 1 1Tc ' script ion. •CASE. with a dreadful 54..-orbutic Complaint. which covered hat • A Young Lady of Glasgow was, for some tune, troubled_ , skin v' ' .i ith thick scales and affected her he.ilth so Much , t . 1 . ,',1 her .friends considered her so far gone as ti, be out olthe 15 t e e .of Medicine to do her good; at temp they were t tdvi • administer to her. the Anti- lin perigutes, or Solomon's WO:: and his Abstergent Lotion; which Medicines, atter dile P o ' & severance, completely cured her. The young 0 1,41 :S bo her friends do not cause to have their names publish , 11e',.. those who wish to use the same Medicine for the like plaints, may apply to Mr. M‘Von.fiditlavho will refer. P" to the part y. onpateirangtioian.,aixieinintreu,re state of Tne Anti- fineetigines, or Solomon's Drop'.( withu ../d.ehr; cury or any deleterious 'Preparation), for te curs e, 11 .,..1;. , Scurvy, Leprosy, Venereal Diseasc,,and all Disorders ort;t and almost imperceptible ; the pea i -e.. the blood, are gradual- io t 0,.. . stitute that has ever been discovered for that dattgetuui 11.1 P.,,,,, rat Mercury, . sweetening the blood, and itulating, cape' a n noxious and impurepices, givisKstreneth alit wo to the nerves, enlivening an invigorating hot bad,' 8 mind. Many Medical Men have treated MAStell plaints, but they all follow the steps of their , predecessos. Mercury, Mar.:ors' is still their grand climacteric 1 „IreO to. notwithstanding ail its alledged improvements a incf._, tions, is Mercury nevertheless I I But the Anti- Impel' Iwo have long been used in an extensive private practice, 01 i i i a multiplicity of instances found to be ><A soverei4n, 3 4 ffil i a j• fPeedY, and elnaual remedy to every stage and sYrP'-oe. Justly claiming a pre-eminence over all other hledicines,_,, Ing decidedly adapted forithe speedy removal of thee,„`T/is on certide 0..0; plaints, as well as the Scrofula, King's Evil, an“ ;1 1 1," Leprosy iteetfcannot be paralleled in die whold 2 " .° dica. • ei i fillg a : ligggtgflgiksggYgi Drops purify the blood, and restore the system wheoln''' by the imprudent use of Mercury. ectif Prepared by Dr. Solomon, Gitztd.House, near Liv e A rt OW in "is. bd-- end 331. Bottles: the latter containing four- die.' lormer, by which the pUrchoser saves 9s. N a me It el 2 id Bottle his a Stamp, Which bears the Proprieties v o is' Address, " Saud. Solomon, Liverpool," to WOO " felony. ,1:0 0 c r ow .e . ABS I' ERGENT LOTION, for renioVing 1' 4 , 1 10:11t from the surface of the' hutnan body, Pints 4 3 . v' 0 Pints as. Od. duty included, • Smith,Sold p b e y r , ruMnr,ser. , sMathews,o.3, anl:TioN., r i . B, ft ise S t o r u s n o r! : N L_ ,2 o ll l. 9 : l4 i l i! , :•;:e si ' l . Mr. Baxter and Mr. Scott, Soirth-Bridget Mr Vo,l,l;sfrovi Husband, Elder and ,Co. Eslli.borgl);. Mr. Beater, H. dots! vr • Contem Greenock ; (:. illowiling, P;oll.e.W, i il ,l , lord, Kiltnarnock •-- W. Young, Irvine ; A-, l ''' 0 0, ' Ne t :: Whiteside, Ayr; W. Crawford, (Gwen; 1-, Cr'' ` 6 ,tie Or"' Douglas ; T. 61.9 , 1il lan, Kirkcudbright aidy ; P . Myth, Leven; J. Dempster, CLIP' ;', ~ ~ers'!l! Aberdeen ; Dr. Wtute, Bantf; Nl'llit:_ 104)0011.,.. dee.; , Cr.ligie,. Nlontruse; I. Alitclicli,,'j'illegivet,; :14 &Menzies Stotalway ; P. Tiolor, Stlarifit.. %i d 40 , i , 1,,,,,,,,r: Bisset, Perth; •W.An.ierson, Stcr}inS; C° 1431 'l,.i. Yiba,,io.; Alexander, Dunfermline ; 'Wit Vitt 13iii.1.}?* ~..., ;;;..,, ~ . broach; Dickson, Inglis, punt ; Yrlterrf..r.,lo4.,4i. i.. 1:, Weddel, Ainwick ; Patersoo, Arbutiinot, a}..,:i.!,,,ti oy,,rjtoj terhead ; R. Ml)Orirtiti, TIVIO.atc, t;if,?:,:_, 10 t l i , 01 BoOkMilers and Venders- of Patent IVI t . 1 Ks , or Kingdom. .,101. 17,, . . . 0 ell tor .I“ • ' ..----"- paid, and 1 s . . Ekl. as ,i t,e,. 0f .... ..: ..,., ..---,..` N,'l3. The postage of all Letters tO t, 111 „ 1 , ? :: ' = • i.. Alio, 1,0- re, 4; losiesna.)qu ,le nust 1K yt{tifCtfC~l.