The Sun. — London, England, 1811-12-30 00:00:00

an. it.T.S. Porter, of elleityini, tluckinglimilAtre, `rneat Wall, a. twelve, Guild-411, London, Jan. tB. E. t t'airless, late of Staple's ton, London, hut now of tipper .Charles-strect, Northampton - square, Clerkenwell, Nlidrilesex, money-scrivener, at tw.ive, Guildliall o r London... Jan. au, R. Rippon, of Liverpool, merchant, at eleven; at the Royal 1i0t , .11, •.. Jaa .20. S. Perks of tt- alsall, qtaffurd,, faelor, at ekven, at the Royal 'Jan. 20. 1. Millwood, of Huddersfield, York, cornfadur, at • eleven, at the liamstlen's.Arms Inn, Huddersfield. lie. co. S.', iitiekrill„ of . Great Grimsby, Lincoln, met. chant, at eleven, at the Queen's Head rut G timsby. • laiL at W. Thornton, or - Hinckley, Leici:ster, curlier, at cloven, at the hull's Head Inn, Hinckley. a 7. A . lopes, late of Montgomery, tanner, at cloven,' at the e7c,SS Foxes,' Montgomery. "an., ti. H. Lee, of Holywelf-street, Shoreditch, sex, ,iIVeTSMiI.O, at one, Guildhall, Lirndoil. Jan. IS.. B. Hills, late of Enfield Town, !Middlesex, linen. draper, at ten, Guildhall, London. Jan. i 8: W. Sa bine, of Gosport, Hants, grocer, at twelve, C uildhalL i rondon Jan. 20 J. Davies, of Chepstow, Monmouth, watelWnaker, at twelve, at the ztell Inn, Chepstow. Jan. Fountrinier, of Cannon-street, London, paper manuftOttrer, and S. Fourdrinicr, of Charing-etoss, Lon don. p . uper.inanufadurers, at ten, Guildhall, London. Jan. 22. D Ilewson, of W,igton, Cumberland, and ). Barnes, now or late of Little Hampton, Cumberland, ma nufaOur'ers, at eleven, at the King's Arms, Carlisle. Jan. 7.13,5. Cahnum, late of Beekinghain, EaseX, Cal penter, atone, Guildhall, London. . Jan. 25. P. Maliews, of Copthall.court, London, mer. chant, at twelve, Guildhall. Jan. 22. S. Wilishaw, of the City-road,' Middlesex, tailor, at eleven, Guildhall, London. Jan. /5. T. Nicholls, late of Plymouth, 1111CFC.1141.1t, at twelve ' Guildhall, London. Jan. /2. I. Ault, of Love-lame, Easteheap, London, broker, at eleven, Guildhall. Jan, 25. H. Moseley, of Laurence Pountney.hill. London, merchant, and 1. Whieldon,. of Copthail-court„ Throg moiton-street,,London merchant, at one, Guildhall. Jan. t 7. M. Glover and E. Glover, late of Kidderminster, Worcester, milliners, at eleven, at the George'lnn, Bowd ley, Worcester.. Jan. t 7. E. If Woodfield, late of Stourport. Kiddermin ster, Woicester, ar.d W. Bird, late .of Stone, Stuillard, boat-builders, at eleven, at the George. Inn, Bewciley, Worcester: • • CERTIFICATES, in ti Alt 1 lg. C. King, of the Albany, Piccadilly, Middlesex, bill-brotter. 14 — Pickering, of :Liverpool, wine-merchant. .1. Blythe, of Bristol, merchant. P. F. Le Brun, late of OM Bond-streci, Midd!csex, chemist. 1. Francis, of Leather-lane, Middlesex, leither-cuttur. 1. H. Valentiug, Church-passage, Old iewry., and. of Lloyd's Coffee-house, London, insurance-broker. 1. Swindells, of ivlarple-bridge, Ludwurch, Derby, inn keeper. W. Teideirian, sen. and %V. Teideinan, jun. now or late of Portsmouth, tavern. k eepers. PARTNERSWIPS DISSGLPED. Raynes and W. Bawtree, 131ue Anclior.rord, Bormond. say, Surrey, glut .manufacturers . D. Vicher and Sons, Providence-row, Finsbury, INliddleex, Ivatch•manufacturers. ' H. Richardson and R. Clark,, jun. Southampton-place, NeW-road, Middlesex, brick,makers. . . 3:Gibbons. 13.1.1ibbons, jun. and C. Phillips, Bilston, stairord, iron masters. S. Hunter/ . and 1. Brown, Brown, Macclesfield, Chester, iron-founders. G. W. Gravencr, Dover, and It. Matson, Deal, atrnrnies. AltbitedN PdPt.ng. DOCVNIENTSi ACCOMPANYING THE ISM ES,IIIENT . g i4ESgAOh CONCIteSS AT Tug opaNING O[ THE PRESENT tHI3,ION. [Continued from our I'er of Montby.l MR, FIZOTER 'TO MR.:...IONROS. wahhington, tuty 26, a r. have bad the honour to recEive your letter , of July .23, in answer to mine of the ad and 14tb inst, which, you will permit me to say were not merely relative to his Majesty's Orders in Conocil, and the blockade of Mily, iFlo6,,but also to the President's proclamation of last November; and to the conse= • quellt act of Congress of March .2, as well as to the just complaints which his Royal Highneiis the hinco Regent bad commanded me to m ,ke to your Government, with respet.t to the Piochtnation and to that acl. If the United States' Government has expeaed that I should have made communicatioes wirch would have enabled Ihem to coice to an aecommo• dation with Great Britain on the giound on which alone you say it was'possible to meet us, and that you mean by that expression, a departure from r ur system of defence against the new kind of warfare still praaised by France; I am at a less to discover from what source they could have dented those exaectations; certainly. not from the correspond ence between the Marquis Wellesky and Mr. Piokney. Before I proceed tO reply to the arguments which are brought forward by you to shew that the de ciees of,Berlin and Milao are repealed, I must enter into,an explanation upon some points on which you have evidently inisaporehe, tied, for I will not . so p. pose you could have %visited to misinterpret, my meaning. And first, in regard to the blockade of May 1806, I Must avow, that I am wholly at a loss to find out fronwhat partlif my tatter' ic is that the Piesident has drawn the unqualified iuferenee, that should the Orders in Council of tBO7 be 'revoked, the blockaded May, iBOO, would cease with them. It is most material, , that on this point, no mistake should exist between' us. From your letter, it \Vieth] appear as if on the question of blockade ,which Arne riea had so unexpectedly connected with her de• wands for a repeal of our Orders in Council, Great Briedo had made the-concesiinn requiriad of her as if, after all that,has passed on the subjeet,- . --after the. astonishment and regret of his Majesty's Go vernment at the United States haying taken up the 'iew which the French Governmem presented - of our just 'apt' legitimate principles of blockade which are exemplified in the blockade of May, 1806, the whole ground taken by' his INiajest)'l3 Government was at once abandoned. When I had the honour to exhibit to you my instructions, and to draw up, as I conceived, aceordingio'youtewishes and those of the President, a statement of the mode in which that blockade would probably,disappear, I .11dVer meant to authorise such a conclusion ; and I now beg most uneqt.Avocally to disclaim. it. The block ade of MAy 1,806, wilt not continue teter the repeal of the Orders in Council,, unless his Maj e sty's, Go yernmenfshall think fit to atilit4llll it by the special application of a statkient naval force, and the tact Of its being so continued or not, wit! lie noticed at the time. If in thk view of time matter, %Zilch is certainly presented in a conciliatory spelt IMO 01 the obstacles to a complete understanding between our - countries can be removed by the United States' Government waving ell farther reference to that blockade when tliicy can 1 Justified in asking a repeal of the Ceders, 'and I may communicate this to my Government; it will undoubtedly, be very satisfactory; but I beg distinctly to disavow having made any acl:nowledgment that the blockade would cease, timely in consequence of a revocation of the 'Orders in Council': Whe . fievcr it does cease, it will cease, because there be`'no adequate force applied to maintain it. On another very material point, Sir, you appear to have misconstrued My words; for in no one passage of My letter can I discover:any mention of innova tions on the part of Great f3ric,iirf, Welt as you sa y excited a painful surprise in your Government.' In answer to grreStion, of vonrs as to what were the cis.... crees or regulations of if,atice which Groat Britain complained of, and, againSt she (beets her re taliatory measures, 1 brought distinctly into your view the Berlin and Milan decrees ; .and you have nut denied;:becauqc, indeed, you could not, that the provisions of tliose decrees: were-new mea sures of war ran the pad of France,. acknowledged : as such by her Ruler, and'contrary to the:principles and usages of civilisei nations. That the present war has been_ oppressive-beyond example by its duratio.a, and the desolation it spreads through torope*,'l willingly agree withleu ; but the United States cannot tnurely. mean to attribute the cause to Gra Britain. The qUestion between Great Bs itain sod !frame_ is. that of an honourable struggle against the lawless efforts Of an aUdacieus ty rant; and . America cannot but have the with of every independent nation as to its result. On a third point, Sir, I have also to regret that my meaning should have been mistaken. Great Britain - never contended that British merchant ves sels should be allowed to trade with her enemies, or that Bt itish - property should be allowed entry into their ports, as you would infer ; such a. pretension would, indeed, be preposterous ;' but Great Britain cues' contend against the system of terror pht in praniee' by France, by which usurping ,authotity, wherever her arms or the timidity of nations, will en `able her to extend her influence, she makes it a crime to neutral enuntries - ap well as individuals, that they should possess' articles, however acquired, which have neon once the pi - tapes! English industry, -or of the British Soil. Against such an 'abominable. and extravagant pretension every feeling must re 4 Tole,and the honour 'no less than the interest of Great.Britinn engages her to oppose it. 'Diming to the course of argument contained in your letter, allow 'Me to express my surprise at the* ,conclusion you draw in considering the question of 'priority rekive to the 'French DeCreea or British 'Orders ill'Councij., It was clearly proved{ that the blockade ol MayABofi, .was maintained by an. ina.: r kquate naval force; and theferore was a blociiade 1 • ' tdiitided ati jtis Etna teelitmalo • t and I have not beard .that it was cdhsidered iu a contrary light When notified as'such to you by Mr. Secretary Fox, nor until it suited the vies of France to en deavour to have it considered otherwise. Why Attierica took up the,view the French Government chose to give of it, and could see in it gt minds for the French decrees; was always matter or astonish ment in England. You! remarks on the modifications at various times of our system of retaliation will require dirt less re ply, from the circumstance of thd" Orders in Coun cil of April, I sop, having superseded then alt. They vt ere calculated for, the avowed put ~ :ose Eot.softening the erfed of the original orders on new ral commerce, the incidental effett of those orders en neutrals bay ing been always - sincerely •revetted by his Majesty's Government : but when-it was found that neutrals objected to. them they were removed. - As to the principle of retaliation, it is founded on the just and natural right of self-defence against our enemy. If France is unable to enforce her decrees on the ocean, it is not from the want of will, for She enforces them wherever she can do it—her threats are only empty where her power is of no avail. " . - In the view y ou. have taken of the . conden of America in her relations with the two belligerents, and in the conclusion you draw with respect to the impartiality of your country as exemplified in the non-importation law, I lament to say I cannot agree' with you. That a6t is a direct meesore against the British trade, errs errar a time wharf all die legal authorities in the Uttite:t Sates appeared !Oily to contest the statement of a- repeal of the French de crees, on which Was founded the .President's pro claniation of Nov. 2, and consequently to dispute the justice of the proclamation iu elf. You urge, Sir, that' she British Government' pro mised to proceed pffi : liassu with France in the re veal of her. edits. It is to be wished you could point out to us any step France has taken in the rc peal of hers.' Great Britain has repeatedly declared that she would repeal when the French did so, and . she means to keep to that declaration. I have stated to you that we could not consider the letter of Augem the sth, declarin g the repeal .01 the French edicts provide!' we revoked our Orders in Centred, or Aelerica resente d our not doing so, as a step of that mturee and • the French Govern ment knew that we could not.; their object was evidently,. white their system was adhered to in all its rigour to endeavotir to persuade the American Government that they had relaxed from it, and to induce her to prsiceed in enforcing the submission of Great Britain to the inordinate demands of Franc. It is to be lamented that they have but too well reiccO.ded ; for the united States Government ap pear to have considered the French declaration in the sense in which France wished. it to be taken, as an abtoltite repeal of her decrees ; without advert ing to the conditionatterms Which accompanied it. Bat you assert that no violations of your neutral rights by 'France occur on the high seas,'and that there were all the violations alluded to in the Act of emagress of May, t 8 to. I readily believe, indeed, that such cases ere rare, but , it is owing to the pre• ponderance of the British navy that they are so : when scarce a ship under . the French tug can ven ture so sea without being taken, it is not extraor dinary that they make no eaprerea. If such viola tions alone were within the purview of your Jew, there would seem to have been no necessity for its .enactment. The British navy might haVe . been safely trusted for the prevention of this occurrence. lint. I have always believed, and my GovernMent has believed, that. the American Legislatots had in view in the provisions of their law . as it respects France, not only' her deeds, of violence on the sea's,' but alt the novel and extraordinary pretensions and practices of her Government which infringed their neutral rights. We have had no evidence as yet of any of thosepreterisions being abandoned. To the ambiguous declaration in Mr. - cham . iiagny's note, is opposed the nnambigueus and personal' declaration of Buonaparte himself: You'urge that there is no thing incompatible with she revocation of the De crees in respect to the United Slate, in his exeres; sions to the. Deputies butt; the free cities of Elam burgh, Bremen, and Lubeck ; that ,it is distinctly stated in that Speech that the Blockade of the Bri tish-Islands cease when the Bviti.h BloekadeS ease ; and, that the French Blockade shall cease in lavOur of thnse nations in Mime Worn. Greet.Brhain re• yokes hers, or who support their rights against her pretensions: It ib to he inferred from this and the corresponding parts of the deciarhtiOn alluded to, that otdess Britain socrifices her principles of blockade, w hich are those authorised by the established laws of na tions, France will IMO maintain her Decrees of Ber lin and Milan, which, indeed, the Speech in ques tion ddclares to be the fundathental laws of the French Empire. I do not,- I confess, conceive how these avowals of the Ruler of France can be said to be compatible with the repeal of his decrees. in 'respect to the United States. If the United States are prepared to insist on the sacrifice by Qreat Britain of thean cient and established rules of Maritime war prac tised by her, then, indeed, they may avoid the operation of the French decrees ; bui, otherwise, according to this document, it is very lear that they are still subjected to them. The decree of Fontainbleau is'confessedly founded on the decrees of Milan and Berlin, dated the igth of Oct. 1810, and proves their continued existence. 'The report of the French Minister of December 8, announcing the perseverance of France in her de crees, is still farther in confirrnatiott of them ; and a re-perusal of the letter of the Minister of Justice of, the 25 . 111 of last December, confirms; me in the inference I drew from it : (or, otherwi,e, why should that Minister make the proSpective .restora tion of American vessels, taken, after the first of November, to be ,a consequence of the tion-int portation and,not of the French revocation.; It th e French Government had been sincere, they . would have-ceased infringing on the neutral rights of Acne rice, after the first of NOvember,—that they vio lated them, however, after that period, is no torious. Your Government seem to let it be understood that an ambiguous declaration from Gredt Brit a i n , similar to that-of the French Minister, would.have been acceptable to them. Rat, Sir,. is it Consistent POLICE. BoW-STRKET.—On Saturday Waller, alias TYilliarn 1 hue, was brought to the: otfice, charged with be ing a transported-felon, at large, before the expira , tion of his sentence, having escaped trom on board the Retribution transport-ship, at Portsmouth. Samuel Davis;, one of the turnkeys belonging to Newpte, proved, that the prisoner was convicted at the last May Sessions, in the Old Bailey, and sentenced to transportation ; and not • producing a pardon, he Was committed for trial. - George. Lesler was charged with stealing it mili t:try great-coat, the property of Mr. Croft, a tailor . , of Fleet-street. The prisoner proved to be, the man who sold the coat to a person, who .is a dealer in second-hand 'clothe's, in Air-street, Piccadilly, whore-sold it to a military Officer, upon whose person it vas recog nized by Mr. Croft. He was committed for trial. UNION .HALL,...—MURDLitt OF LIEUTENANT JOHN 110N.--Qn Friday, last, as Collingbourn, constable of Wandswoeth, was sitting, in the King's.head house there, be °vet heard a Corp Oral of the'Serrey -Militia, who' was .in the tap-room, say he knew a man who wag acquainted with the persons who ,Inurdered Lie.ntenant. Johnson, in the Dentfard• road, about years - ago; and that 016 person he alluded' to had,Liei.iteintit Johnson's watch in his possession. Collingbourn, tt overhearing this dis course, immediately sent an account of it to his bro. ther, Collingbourn, at Union-hall ; who, with Oar, were directed by Mr. EVANCB, the gistrate, to proceed directly, to Wandsworth, and ',lnVestigate the business. The officers did so; and optn - questioning the Corporal, li v e .repeated what he had before said, and took them to a house at Kings ton, where he, pointed out the person to'whom he bad alluded, ns knowieg the murderers. The offi cers,immediately took him into cestody. At first, lie behaved .with great effrontery, and made a shew of resistance; but finding.they were determined to take him, he subniitted, and on being questioned, he repsated W4t he had before told the Corporal 'respecting the Murderers of Lieutenant Johnson.— The officers brought hina to town, and on Satuiday he Underwent a private examination at this Office, belaro Tuomss Evstsce, Ng. when 'he gave the Dames and descriptions 'of the alleged murderers ; anti of whom, he said, had proposed to joidin an expedition on the highway bUt he not liking the speculation, declined ir. One of the murderers be described as being at present a convict on board the bulks. The I\ll4gistrAle ordtred the prisoner to be eigini,sed, on - finding security:to appear'and give evi-, &neer when called. on against the persons he bad mentioned as the murderers, after whom a and search' is making. 410:10. NOM. 'The Palace of Cassel having lately been in a graf treasure destroyecl.by tire, the citizens presented a loyal Address to King Jeronse 13uonaparte; and to his consort, on the occasion, otTeting tote-build the ,editiee at the expense of the city.' This offer Jerome declined 3; hut allowed his consort to acct a pre sent, tendered for the purpose of rnaliing goodilic fosseisostained.by her Majesty. _ In Eitrope there are thirty-seven Fpecies, of trees which grow Lathe height of thirty feet, of which .etighteen form the mass of their, forests, and sixteen 'ice found in every . part 'of Europe. Jo America, there are ninety species of trees which.exceed forty feet in height, "..Lhey.are. all natives of the forest, and seventy-two :ire common to . all" parts: of the IJ , ited . States. In Euroje.,, only seven ate ht: for ch aritecture ; in America, no fewer than iiiipone. LONDON: Printed by I 110 MA S WOOD, of No. 35, Widen-lane, Covcnt-garden; and Published by WI LLIAM A R MIG E R SCRIPPS, South Molt At cae SUN Ovocg, No, I le, Stuun', whore ildvertisemenis, Orders for the Paper, Leiters for tte, &-et . (posl.m.id) With the dignity 01 1 a nittol thit reSpeetS ;WIG 1 ° speak in ambiguous language ? The subjects and citizens of either country would in the. end be . the victims, as many are already, in all probability , who, from a misconception of the meaning of tit& Freech Government, have beeu led into the niost - ,imprudent speculationi. Such conduct 'could not be to proceed psripassu with France in revoking our edicts, but to descend to the use of the pan .dious and juggling contrivances of. her cabinet, by which she fills her coffers at the expense of hide. pendent vations. A sintihr construction of proceed ing pan passu might lead to such decrees as those of Rambouillet, or of Bayonne, to the system of exclusion .or of licenses, all measures of France against . the American commerce, in nothing shot of absolnte hostility. It is urgent that no vessel has been condemned the ii . erodi s tribunals ii6aend t lowtfh that such s a : f e l oNno November. e r principles ro u o a l Decrees however, that there have been some de tained slant , that p part of the Cargoes consisted of goods, not the produceoftArnc:rica,w: seited, and the other part, together with the vessel itself, only released after the' President's proclarnae fi t sa io ua n nio , d b iev ecame known in France.i These circtene stances neutrai ,ssyusrieelym,o..nuliy:bprhoet•redtehseireditfioculty that Frew:l ratinthrecc:»leleaisluiliregstitaekr eanniin-cA:ecnexrPeicsirecsiaagglialagnifirdsl44l t ttheitS.i4 commerce of Great Britain. She seizes in virtue of .the Berlin and Milan decrees, but she makes a partial restoration for .the purpose of deceiving America. I have now followed you, b e li e ve, Sir, throtigbt the whole range of your argument ; and on teviesve ing the course of i:, I think f may securely say, that no satisloCtory proof has yet been brought forward of the repeal.ef the- ohno - xious decrees Of Franca: but, on the contrary, twl it. appears they continue in full force, consequently that no grounds exist OM which you can with justice demand of Great Britain n a revocation of Wr Orders in Cou ncil; hat have a right to complain of the conduct of the Arne. rican Government in enforcing the provisions 04 , tits as of May 1810, to the exclusion of the litl`sti trade, and afterwards in obtaining a special law tot Ow same purpose, • though it was notori" 66 a t 114 time hat France still continuedli, , r agt : ttsi;Gt ) l' 1 ) o 14 American commerce, and had recently pronluiev.ted bs IO ca formed o n t e i ‘ n v t r; h o b e f n i t d n , e n t c o l r i; v o a e , u s , g h6l3lll:lC'eernitsls pti(t)ltsitierhOifl.ll°- agents; and that all , the suppositions you . Pa. l 7. -or of her pretentsironss' oni to t h r i a e cte Par l t d o ll i l are wholly groundless. I . have also stated to yoi.,. the view his Majesty's' Govern xeu t lets taken .0I Iv, questioe of the blockade of May W e O; and only remains that I urge afre sh the injustice l United States'. Government persc veriog 14 5 IL 3 ; union with the French s • eterrt for the purpose at ; Crushing the comm er ce of Gr eat Brine). vood Front esery consideration which etios r, 1)e suchya, o c r a i li nt t e l r p e o s n t can e s i n i g e g 37 l o - , . t a l i i l e ,e re v a r pp fi e li :s ss ; itt3: mt l t h ua i tn c i l i c i a c ii t a i l o v i u s o7, e - r l7 h e o r :ss n, e s c q e ve t r: , l e i t t t i t ' l e a e b i a nsj i a l ti d r o s'Yf t a t ia)f il ;; ; l Y : t i t re l3 :l lol( iits a t b4 even before' the Congress meet, n new view may taken_ of the subject by 't President, which will lead to a more happy resole.. I have the honour to be, Willi very high consideration- and respett, Sir, yours, &c. AuottsTus J. FosTlat• i 1 I To tho lion. lames Monroe, 4:c. (To be continuel.l 'nee . .. . --- 7 - . An important (a& haslranspired from Ittisio' Norfolk grazier,. respealing the .SWedish turniP- After saving some part of his crop for seed, 0110' ing up the roots or app les to throw away, Iltc4F'e").t vered that they were suund.and h nutritinto, a nd r“',; w ithstanding the time of the-year, w en the set Wag gathering, his horses and other cattte tcd al them with great avidity. ' Er L, An ingenious Mechanic and hon-founder, ( n . L'',.. e ., 1 cester, has erected a threshing machini,, lobe wcifh` f by wind with horizontal sails, upon the Oral ° ,l ; Mrs. Wright, of Exton- On the firgt t he th°:l6. there was but a trivial breeze, it threshed tt):ttOl" ration; and with a poWer e * qual to hare driv" threshing n - chines. , ~- , t,„.4ef, An affray took OW on" Wednesday al t he Ci lic "' 6 l between parties, of the 7'rh German Legiutaa- bd b a a t : a t:Et: h i t sgth Foot, but by the.prompt interference of 1 ()slicers, the dissurh3oce was quelki without 371' ddrivroos - . wounds being.inflieted, thou, s ev lIIRIV. o f 0 On Thursday last, Mrs . 'laity► of SalisburY•slulr ' Gra. . The same day, in .Harley-street, ham. hsq . . of a Son. tho On Friday last, at his house in 13loomsburPaciulre' Lady.of Peter Blackburn, Esq of a Son. r the Ori Saturday se'nnight. at Elintield, near Doncaste •0 scat Ot Mrs. Childers, the Lady Pthe Lotry of Robert 4er.wc‘e.,l)"3kl). On the 2;d inst. Colonel F i kuy last.. , ftest. lll ' elvittl Farrar, ma of Ashley, Northamptonshire. to !' miss 0 , 14 at MMultitonßtilcStijairordshire, the ..„ A nna , Barrti.3 ,Chet Wade. second daug hter o f . S, it John Chetw Annei"el 1. Caroline, eldest dtughter o f t h e 14te R o bert 1 4 ), Esc}}. of the Eatt.lndia CompanY's Civil Service. ters hito ' 2tge AlfreAt Muskett, Esq. of Snow ti Fields , S°L it ii,g,o ll Un ;-her .4l' ' -131-°g(On Un itel fE! riace IIVIIII the B o th Y :rdE: nt wni f 1 2 1 2 1c 2! . ...-----..------ L <____ s a K . Money, of Herefords,o%-nof: lzrr• t 140 1 0 ) . se .c c u on a d o d % a e ughter of lorvithan Morgan, Esq., of St. & ITOcerl, 1 a3rl inst. ,at the Vicomte.- Ashwll, near e . 1 , rq. the Rev, Townsend A ndrews, V.icerrO nd c,4 var. • St.... Katharin e Coleman, fettelturch.strer, aged u••• o t v di ,Pn the 24th inst. inliaker: street, after a lag e ns. oo IH l: s9 th Sl o r 2 John -tlins L t7a . t i h h e i r s I:hull:1a: 1 P 3 0 3 :till . : 11 • W s: uill 1 e g the ,6 1 st Iteg 4 e r stl o ar ilnottginF, Mr. v d tili t ierrl e Y ye tf ro fF e g iocV .n;l4 0, , M.Y.. . r eynaou 1. Mlt 111 gc, upwards 0 4 to His ‘f• e t 4 4 .; S y. Have,o Sunday !e:onight, "ad,nly, og id 63 , the ebecvsiol Nortiik '46")4.of (hniundest"' cm/11"1"1" ;vlhlsSi' folk. , and of Little Bruton, other% ise Barton 1 0-' W• HIGH IVATER• AT LONDON' .131 0 • 06, : ROW. • ' fr j , Murning, fir min. after 3; i Evening, i 9 min, 3 ,•,..... tln-street, Grosverorisquate, must be aticireb4ed.