The Sun. — London, England, 1811-02-22 00:00:00

Barlow, the iate agnat,tons in'a ;gteat mcasttre to have al oleo. To *hew that his Condnet was not ap• proved by the Court tit Dire&ors, Major Boles (sus pended by the 00Vet ,ment of Madras) had been restoredbreaUse they tbund that his , of fence consisted in obedience to his superior officer,— The Paperm necessary to elecidate this and other transitetions were what he anted. The other transattions referred to the vials of three Ott - leers, Cblotiets Bell and Doveton, and Major _Story From Om papers, , I.triien tot niqbed, it would be seen, that F` . . the Courts Muted which tried them WelVill variance with eactother. The Hon. Gentleman next noticed' I : the traneatlions respecting the creditors of the Na ,, ; hob of the earnreic. For ' the liquidation of the debts of that Ponce a fund of five millions hid beet, • set reeirt. In inquiring Into these claims of the crc -1,. stir{rs, a i)erson timed Ruddy flow, one of the na . , . twes, WVISIMpriC lied on various charges 3.. and the . were expences ordered to be paid out of this fund, He next mentioned a 'charge. against the Govern- Merit, of having removed a Mr. Roebuck to an tin healthy , spot, in the country, where in a few weetia be died ; and also that a Magistrate (Mr. Maitland), who had committed this Ruddy Row, was removed, together with others who, had tendered themselves obnoxious to Sir George, under these circumstencea. The bond for which Ruddy Row was found guilty of forgery, by .a ' Btitish Jury, was one of a great number; notwithstanding, so much did the Chief justice; Sir J:Stratige, Interest himself, that he sent to England for his pardon, but he had taken a dose of prison. The Hon. Gentleman, alter making some further observations, stated bis intention to move for the recall of Sir George Barlow, and con cluded with moving, '‘.. 4 Pie; copies; of certain let. teeseliddressed• to Sir George Barlow, front the real creditors of the late Nabob of the Carnatic, Ike." • Mr. G. Gilmer maintained, that the statement of the Hon. Gentleman was a very aggravated one ; the acts end intentions of Sir G. Barlow had been coloured and distorted, as 1 he ,papers when produced would Shew. He' . wished thetefore to say a few words on the subjett, The origin of the Carnatic debt'Was this ; a sort of corruption had been going on for years ; Whep the territory of the Nabob was eeded to the Indian Governineet, in order to loves» floe fairly the claim of the creditors, and proem anruotounded or unjust claim., it was judged ne cessary to appient Cienmeisitriters to sit in England and Madras--that was before Sir George Barlow came to the Goveentnent at that time, viz. when . Mr. Petrie was at the head. There was a manufac ture of forged- bonds, purporriug to be those of the Nabob, brought into the public market for sale; a Committee of Inquiry was forincd, of which Com mittee the Law °flit:els were members; and it was found that, to a ,certain extent, forged bonds were in circulation. A prosecution eas instituted against a native, one Pupeia Bratninee, and treprose this charge the CC/04)11634MM selectee! [toddy Row ; but Popeia instituted a counter-oharge for forgery against Roddy, scd by a dexterous tnanceuvre got him conviCted. With respect to Mr. Roetreck, lee was charged nut On account of the. Carnatic debts,. but as holding laetious setetments, although one of the principal officers of the Government; the Con sequence was, that he was sent to one of the most healthy spots on the banks of the sea, and died, not as had been stared, in a few days, but some months after, quite advanced in years. As to Mr. Maitland, he was rereoved for not discharging his dieter as' a Magistrate. Without entering nee a refutation of the charges, all that Ise icquired was, that Gentle men would suspend their opinions on the caedutt of Sir George 13arlow till the whole of the paws' were before the Horse. All that the Company de sired was at compide investigation, without passion or prejudice: Thus far he would say, that the 'conduct of Sir George Barlow would entitle him to the approbation, not only of the House, but of the country. , Lord IF.sr.KSTONR supported the opinions of his non. Friend (Mr. Greet ey), with respect to the eon dud of Sir C.G. Barlow, whom he considered HS have ing been• the means of creating the disturbances come plained of. , . Mr. Wet Lees contended that the conduct of Sir -George Barlow was highly commendable. He had to struggle with mutinous parties, and was, 111 sop ported by the Members. of his , own Government. The Noble fend had complained of Sir Genrge e but had helorgot the cominitt of General M`Dowall, which first led to the disturbances ? It was easy, sitting in this House, to canvass the conduct of Fublic Otto :=r, hot if 'those Gentlemen, so prone to censure, were in the place of Sir Georges Bar loW, they would nut- only think, but act differently. Lord Fueeseorerieselained. ' Sir T. Teinroe declared, that it- wes evideut the eau s cs of the law l'ehenion in India rested solely with the Governmeet of Madras. Ha did not , *semi to say that they had caused the rebellion, but that it was founded on something (whether right or wrote; be woulii riot now preteod to determine) which they kid done,; An him. Gentleinut oppo. site had depr.cnted the condeothation of Sir George }kaki*, until the papers illestraiive of his conduei .should be prodeeed ; tie it s —but the ,aerie nava- Sere of justice wits uneeemionebly due to the team tuoate General 'lll`Dowell. It wax very piobable that Sir G. Barlow might Itaye beer; only tirM; but tmtil he saw proof to the cinerary,. ill tlit: papers 'which were to be goer lured, he could not help thinking that that Hoe, Batoitet in, substituting ob duracy for firantees, had en :angered the loss of our Indian empire; en empirte which, he would repeat, we had obtained by our crimes, 'Which we were, en tabled to carry on only by' . our injustices and which we should efrobebly lose by our folly, He (Sir T. To censured in strong terms the conettri of the Di e-Mora as exhibited in their diseetell of September ie , i n .ehieh-they refused to hear Geoeral Mee dowall's defence, and in which the inconsistency oppeere e e lapproving in the hest instance of '' the w h o l e '. o f t he eee t ee put sited by sir G. Barlow, reel then of con.teinnieg the stispenstoo of Mejor 14fiWie3. As for the civil pert of the question, it del not appear to him that there had been any v e nue ] forie, interference or the Home Gotern inetit on the repreeentattoo .of the Cortunissionera. tit all the subjects connected with our Indian V , vtPle, which requited im'iliediate and serious iir et %are" air . tarsi anCiirtd to him tv by time. ute ::-.lt il r ,t. I , ; , I 4 li , 1.1} , , , e, .1 , ' , ',; it. , '',l A ; a iz U ~'+ :~~ gent tun the mode administering indicts In that • country. Mr. Waeets explained. Mr. Duevas condemned the , introdu&ion into the diicussion of topics, on which, under the prea sent circumstances, the House wars not ,coMpetent , to pronounce. This prejudging of important ques dons was fair neither to the individuals immediately ' concerned, nor to the House itself. The Hon. Bits . roost had complaitA of the mention which, had been made by his Hun.` Friend of Gen. M'Dowall, but how was it possible, in adverting to the origin of the disturbances at Madras, to . ruid this The Hon. Baronet had also roost unjustly censured 'the dispatch of the Court of Direelors as inconsistent, since it contained an approbation of the whole eon-, duct of Sir G. Barlow. Instead• of this, however, it was, distinctly stated, that ,in the opinien, of the Dirt:aura', the Madras Government hadhot entirely, condueted itself to their satislattion, which' Was: rendered evident : by the subsequent instructions to that Government, to reinstate Major Bowies in the service. The Finn. Mover, in rather - a Sneering kind of way, had animadverted on . the conduct of the Chief Justice of Madras, and of the Government at house, as connected with the pardon granted to Ruddy Row. In speaking most highly of the cha racter, of the integrity, and of the abilities of the 'Chief Justice of Madras, he was :confident that he uttered the sentiments of ail those who were quali fied to judge of him. When the papers should be laid on the table, it would be found that the condo& of Sir T. Strange had been throughout must ex emplary. What had been the course pursued at home ? A-report of the trial , had been received, cite faining details of the evidence ; this was accompaoi ed by a statement from the Judge, of the charge which he had thought it his duty to give to the Jury, and of his reasons fur 'thinking that in then verdict the Jury had acted erroneously, welt this declara tion superadded, that he did not ;prat to theanercy, but to the justice of his Majesty. Now, wing would have been said, if Government, atter receiving such a statement, had not advised his Majesty to extend his Royal Mercy to the party concerned ? He could not sit down without aaortly adverting to she ac 9usation ptelerred against him a few evenings ago bythe Hon. Mover of the present question, namely, that he had last Session urged the India Bill through its various stages at a very late hour ot the night, until the third teadiug, which was proposed at an hour unusually early. 011 referring to those au- Oolitic, which were in every one's possession, he found that on the evening; when the Indil Bill was read a third time, a previous disseussiun had taken plaCe in the House on the subject of the Assessed Taxes, and on the ;notion for the third reading, the lion. Gentleman and the Noble Lord who sup % ported his Statement, had participated in a debate which terminated with a division. How far these facts Were consistent with any intention, to carry the Bill through Parliament by surprise, he lett for the House to detente/le. Lord A. HAMII.TuN declared that ,if ever there was a subject which caked for minute and parti cular :et rte tee, it was the present. lie defended the conduct of lets lion. Friend from the imputa tions which bad been thrown out view it.- His Hon. Friend had been accused of prejudging Sir G. Barlow—of prejudging a titan by whom so many brave Officers had, been condemned, and punished, without aexamination or a hearing ! Yet it WWI for this perion that such extretata tenderness was manifested by the Right Honourable Gentleman tit the head of the Government of India. He would not justify all the ads of the Madras Army ; but, this he would say, that it was the intempereuce of Sir G. Barlow which drove them to those:tient. By law it was declared, that no servants of the :Cern pa ny were to be displaced bout communicating to them the cause in writing, and without giVing them an opportunity of being heard in their defence. — This law had been diteetly violated. : .Even alter the trials, the printing and publishing of ihern were . , refused, on the simple declaration that such a ttleigt• sure was not expedient ! He deprecated the tieral inattention of the House and the Country to subjects of this nature, and declared, that' when he called to mind the various ads of tyranny and oppression of which the British had been guilty to the natives of India, he telt it his imperious, duty . to bring questions of this description under the cousideratiou of Parliameet, as frequently as 'possible. Sir J. ANSTIIUTHER thought, that as this was only a motion fur the production of papers, which there was no intention to reluSe, it Would have been batter to have deferred all comment until the pope's were aatually on the table. If this were an im portaire general principle, it was particularly int 'portant with respect to Indian arnirs, because it wart a long time before papers on Lichen subjects could be produced, and theiefure the impressions made in the speech of the mover of such papers, must re mein for a long time without being wiped away..... Such speeches also found their way to India, and naturally excited in that country, great anxiety for many months Were the ultimate decision of Pattie meta could be known there. Still, however, when asse!iions were made on one side, it became neces sary to balance the inneession made by thotse asser-. dolts by opposite assertions on the other. He rose for the purpose of meeting by assertion, that which wars only assertion. When did papers should be proclked, he would take on bileSelt to prove, not only that Sir George Barlow had hewn great ta lent, genius, and courage, in the sup pressien of the mutiny, but that no part of his emitted during the whole of the military trans actions in India could be fably chatged by uny candid man as the cause of that mutiny. As to the civil transactions it would turn out that Sir G, Ballow had little to do with them. It would turu out that the conduct of the Chief Justice of Madras (consistently with his conduct while holding the saute situation in Nova Scotia), was as honourable to himself as it Was adValitageOUS to the country. An Hon. Gentleman bad taken it for granted, that the Jurors on the trials alluded to hid been 'punished for their verdict. This he positively contradicted. ' Nut a sneak person wile seem' thorie ttiitls as a ju tor was ever punished by Sir G. Barlow on that de count. Ile tweed, tiowever, it would not be cons tended that because an isalividual had sat as a juror s on those 'trials, that he was therefore ttl be indemni. lied from the consequences of any a& w hi c h h e might afterwards 'think proper to comtnit. Far from being punished, seine, of these jurors had been 'promoted. One of the Most confid ent i a l S ervants of the Government (the present- Secretary), bad been one of those jurors. He was willing to admit 'that Sir G. Barlow had disMissedsome < fthe Officers in the Company's Service without 'trial, in doing 'so, he had most wisely used the power entrusted to him. If, in a y government, the individual at the head of that government were not allowed thiS summary authority, no army could possibly re. Main . embodied for any length of time. What be had stated, he :de‘ired disiintily to say. were only assertions; but they were as, good as the assertions on the other sick : and on the produlion of the pa-' pees, be pledged himself •to ptove that they were tats. Sir H. 1110NTGOME/tY bore testimony, (as we understood him) to the high character of General M`Dowall, who, during a . service of 36 years in India, had conduded himself With the most mark ed correEtness and propriety. He declared that the measures adopted by Sir George Barlow to stippros rebellion had inflamed it, and that the ultimate sup pression of that rebellion was attributable to the es pedations which the Madras army (of which the HOn., Gentleman spok e mo st h ig hly) en t erta i ne d o f jus tice from Lord Minto, on his arrival at Madras, and to the exertions of the two officers who had lately reached this country. This was as clear to him, as that the rebellion originated in the suspension of Colonels . Bowles and Capper. He was willing to adroit that sonic of the memorials, circulated as corning from the Madras army, were of an impr(i per nature ; hut he deriied that any man of sense had signed those particular memorials to which he alluded. Mr. GARNERLL asked tae Right Hon. Gentle- Matt opposite a question, which, we believe rehied to any communication that might have been made to Colonel Bowle.i respecting his reinstatement ; but we were not' able distinctly to collect the tenor of the inquiry, or of Mr. Dundas's reply. Mr. Amu, felt it to be his duty to defend the Court of Directors from the charges which had been preferred against thaan. Au Hon. Bart. had accused the Director: of having expressed their de. termination not to hear General M`Dowall in his defence. So far; however, was this ham the tact, that instead of the Directors evincing any indispo sition to hear Gen. M‘Dowall,. General M'Dowall had declared, that n't would not reply to them.— With respect to the Madras Army, it was on record in Fort St. George, in 1807, that that Army .was in an unsetiled state. An H u n. B aronet near hi m ha d imputed the suppression of the rebellion to the ar rival of the Governor-General 'at Madras. Not so. The rebellion terminated, 'because the Officera of the Madras army, found that the Native Officers were .not inclined to suN»rt them, and because they experienced in Sir G. Ballow, a tirmncits ofdt termitviso4m which they,bad not anticipated, Sir T. ToRTON, Mr. CklaViY., and Lord A. HAMILTON, eXplilibeti. Mr. Ilowaaru lamented, that the Chairman of the Court of Direetors should have charged men, who froni North to South, from Bast to West, had traversed the peninsula of India, and by their bravery and perseverance, bad established the interests of the East India Ciappany, with being factious. Was the Hon. (;tautlematt aware of the. (Wiser of his second observation c Could any man who knew any thing of India, be so mischievous is to say that the mutiny was quelled, not by ,the arrival of Lord Minto at IVladras, but by the•nropean Officers not having been able to prevail On the Native Officers to concur with them in their obje& ? With respect to the civil transactions, it appeared on the Lace of the proceedings, that verditita of had been set aside, and that Jurors had ,been punished. • These were circumstances ‘a hich demanded the most se lions investigation. Mr. Awr L explained. • The motion was then agreed to, as were also a number of oilier hiade by Mr. CftELVE? for ditferent official doeumvnts on the sable subjects. 0 0 the motion at Sir J. MoiiTuomititY, copies of the warrants by, authority, which jor-General Gowdie ordered and approved Courts during the time that hq held ,the Chid:Q/11111)HW of the Army in Madras, were ordered to be laidbefore the House. PENITENTIARY 110 USES. Sir S. ROMILLY, in conv,Nuence of the indispo sition of the Secretary of Stith) for the Hotne part meut, 'postponed fort he present, his motion re lative to the Penitentiary ,Houses; with -the inten tion, however, of shortly submitting it to tha House. He witdied to ask the Right Hon. L4entleman oppo site, whether any embarkation of convicts, and par ticularly ot i temale convicts, tor New Suuth Wales was soon to take place ? The CHANCHLLOR of the EXCUEQVER profaned himself unable to answer the question of his Hon.' and Leal ned Ftiend. He believed, however,, that a number Of convicts had been wititini s for some time, \ and lie supposed either that they had already set sail or that they soon would set sail, CAPITAL PUNISIIMENTS. Sir S. ROMILLY tose . to make, his proinised 'no tion on this vubjed ; a subject whic.h, he observed, Was by no means new to the HOLM, 'LIS he should conclude by moving for leave to bring in a 13111 pre eisely sitnilur to that which he had introduced, and which passed that House last Ses,iun. • Adverting to the efforts which he had made 1,. amend the penal law, he called the attention of the House to the good etfeCts which had resulted from the repeal, in 'lOl4, ot the Ad Which waft pywately stealing trom gie ' persolt Thu3e.gol4 eIf , :CAS were, that a greater number of ttials tor that offence h.td taken place, and that of those tried, a tnneh larger plo portion had been contikted. A more deciiiiye Foot of the beneficial effeet of the new law could not , be required. Indeed, the atitieirttions to wlik . h he indulg.-d (ft the .tr , "jet, Many hotly trod..r the (0 spte m , +A, ould hate expellent:ea eo !piece imptioity tot their petty etintus, had be,n mined iu the cow thelleetnetit 1,1 their Meer', us a greater num ber of crimes ot. more Mavitude .114.1 been Intrpi,y itrevent"d. lie reforied ttte hi-oury ot the Bith whLcit intri.dilti tutu the it:c , last Session. The first, which lepealed the 4 ° that rendered it capital privately to st eal to the rte of five shillings in a shop, warehouse , & c ' 1 11 ,. the House of Commons. The next, which wen. repeal the Mt that rendered it cap ital to steilleo value of forty shillings, in a dthelling house, ‘r„4'lS by the shiali majority of two; its a very . ditto': As to the' third of those Bills, which related 1 ° i I ingtoilie value of fort 'shillings on boar) "P; navigable rivers, canals, isrc. untivoidsbieLCl% . stances presented it. hom ever 'cotniag Una ~, cussion. lie had inathrely cons idered the al; since the last Session, and he was mote firallY,4 vinced.than ever of the 'solidtty of the grei' l l'''.,, which he had proceeded, and of the .of the subjed. Still more deeply t.VaS he iol?',1,; with a sense of the impeiativeness of the dotY w io he conceived himself to be discharging, ll'nos from light motives that lie prestamtd to,l e . c° , fr e l f .' ; an alteration in a matter so important as 14 4 , - i l li nal Law of the Land. .He ha 4 always tigtetheo it. was the duty of every man to use i b t a rl o.; which be possessed, for thepurpose of 3 ,',',. t ' ) the well-being of his fellow-creatures, a° " 0. 0 nit aware of any way in which lie coulf m o , advance that well-being' so effeclaally, 3 5 b A I I v' i ing the course - Which he now par it!44l Coke used to say, " that. he considered '"104 who . was successful in his profession, a' amiss" obiagatiou to benefit society ;" and the v '., )r ,", i o, !hit great and learned rrntn proluceo, 3 11 ‘' - o f labour, in the high situation in which he v ill ', o ' ft 4 were his mode of paying the social .debt . i„, hitusell, hisrsuccess, and fir good tortL l4 , lo 4 grest inaimidi.-, profession, had laid hiin Limier. a den! I° w a 2. t:iety among which he lrVed ; mid the vt 4l Y ' ll e ] l _ie intended to discharge that obligatioll, '4' 66 w it deavouring to ameliorate the law, and I bl a ll ay: I crease the security and happineos, of h i , s ; c ,„ ° ,llis i6 was nut a little that would discourage a''' - ' 't ot' not to be discouraged by the considerstO ;o'l had hitherto spent a great deal of tune on I f ' „ , t, ject without doing much good. fle c , r ,!,, t3ilti r:, d ' not' persevere it the sense of ti,e poe":;:tiO t e . ideslly against trim ; but onles , he w',„; l o 4 '‘, the "P'oPritny of the proceeding be "" .. , t ioi-jv were until his proposed measures were n e a' d r joi a much larger ill ijority than that whiul) l l ' v ,:oli ea his seccitil 1.1111,1 at Session. BY l i h u r,,jk ., posed t hat WI,: it was illSinUaLUti akit De "" re ',oo d u . ach store extensive than those viltio . * e iv 0 ' ;b ,e tal i c ie l ) d i t t l l o n i i e n a t t e e l t l i t . ion T o o f tpbrisophoesicizlcilootr: I ,I Y f‘i f i v o l l etr ' 5 , 1 n f Metisure but those writs he had eife:" l ",,,i„ e Id, with the except ion lucked of one, of 1 4 ,•7 4 - vi r l ) o4 tu de, proceeding on s Minn - principles, ""o v i dti 8313:eilt:tusekliv:1:‘)e,irewiw'elr::%tsi..,Itlieeibislit:litstroinc°1doleitd'le:,otiluilatigttliiiser : 1 11 ": 1 3 t i ij :o: o '4il ' l ', against . 'time 'addition of mersorns al i1 t 1' 1 7 4 . 40 0i ll \ V e . f o lc u l t a d i i. _ _ _them by the He conctived himself . as Le - , r ,j,44 1 ' c . onsiderable port ion, of the comtniniith ' 0 0° i t:l 3 oll6e to adopt measurci, which .wer e r°° : ' 4o 4 I 1 strongest motivt.is 0 111LIO CAu ll I r . m s ight a i i t t er t 4A l°, a i rd b a e in B aTe tng a tii.' utit'ijo%ib'Llilli;46lolo44lgl'''. not be kill - tinge it a jud 4e. Should o. ll) '''';o 4 '' , ' suitor his it 1 ri—lit, lest be lsbould become 111 4 1, 't . thus lt ul l: N) )3e .r : l l 3 : l ( . (l l l .l vl l l l.l: l.l : l l.: l ; li i.t ( , l o rd. . , l i el iti t' ll : b o r i , e , e 6)° l l ( s l l, .. l li : e i t l l e r . t f i t v ii . t t l t u f , i% l ol i s s . o l li ce o e it * k) rd i r e: :: ) r t i l ' i l i i ily ii dl u e i i il i . 6v e 'll t l i tit i l l ' a u.l' l i '' o %ll ) %: e i r e s el ' fi l l s l ific to t lwu l eh po t r e s : fic e ela : g i t) : l; g : tl y l i )iii i llt° l} l- r t °ll7l -' l)' : 'l v l rl ,4 llCi l liel c il' , : ''ll t !louse, ur stable, goods warts, of ilic l t °-li :7",[ . . % 1 ' 1 a 'l e e ki , ° .t. i cs s . o l . iiu 6c .i. e o . it ' Of the E ice II s au r g u 'i t i li'' cli t) rI t‘mbbdt7iti tC . r tr I : lol l . l , ll :4l_ ( ll , : e ' ocair ' n en itaac i e t t a a ) tiei t drsh l.l ,l e ! ntenci ' l i oi t e il d ,er il , l e b toe( l l C ii 93 l3:6,ll,4 l lt i ti t tit e' rd.l ' i l aa k ee t: et ) e i G o il a tr : ee l ni . w l: rsde l itthay li v ' t i l iti l ileali l (ob ou i ii ti vl e y ,v : cure.f ;'h ee e g . iegig o c e le lw reil l i ' yoi ' hhi f r ila. lte , l tuad l la ue l ,nt c rie ,st ; : ni tc. yat t l ' i o i t e. vt li elh t lihu l i e t '°) i ° ,:i i ii t r , lus lit' lae :'l l r. g Pe ic i r et ,c: e( i l ei ) lerts ' a v v o l tur ee 1 1,( 3 ifi g. ttii t g i li yvti ll i it i ' l l vi l ei, bel ee l li a s i oi.v,)lB 3(ln en i i e i bil it 6, 1t1 u e j ur 't p in . eit ee t tl de et s i l r t: t el e l ii.. l°l lio d o l lioi ', 1 1; j 1:11 : ' if :: ) , , I t i I I° li ji , i i i ft i e rl i' i, i 1 ' be: P.erfied credit for doing that winc:,;(,/IOY C ► of bringing must . and shah the a___.t...: his icxa). eti suggestionghtitoehopoedtrnhopoh9saubcirdgialulihbdocitrtnilueofeugarntoutisii: from t i t O wt et y e di hh , p r iei , sore t h f : ::: : : ltil m b n iush :: :: l : ei ti:lll 3 l.l I : Lir- ) I 'it'Cil , ; ir it l 'abegehjsi : Id 'tudiiitlu i s ci rili d i c'i6c''lsler .i j i :i ( , 11 4 ;3 ti cl ) : °l‘)Pl: : t i r:turze i n rc c u e nistance as could be stated 1° ilic 1 111/41' , ! n, I.r consequenceu di tabned that omf a m i o i s d orberee Learned lp)wruoiitalneisceiht: stt a lei, , osv e nn : it l t i e lib , e:o l:: : el ;it:l t/ brig : l . t ri t ' an turinerly, as many had escal' a puts)foc` . wilen death m r t e ui l t uot io a l t l i o c w e of co n i v o i d e iv i( i ) (l o l . l(ll l ;l: l oo % i s , Lc i l j, l uo that more Airosecutions Were colll ll ' i ott P r " formerly . i from am, witnesses e forward 11,1°11,011)‘,..'3,, and such c o a ff n e i nders , t b ct ( n i r t :r o ! au : e n t r t ; :r e h d fi l l i e l l. t o a ' b le r l r e ci d i ' l l t i l lt s t i g l: i‘ i d'v , : e el di r s r , a s et i b Cl l: 9 o:l l l:l r ni e ti lle . i knows'' l.' ...l lel . da t ; ' i l s a9l l ltd i 3 F i l Ce : : l ° : ll;l l : l l ; l l ; lf:ll. : pot be l ' a sv itlia tuna: Ince increase of pros. cotions; wild ( ' 3 IP' )41 it rendered conviction LOW e 'r i : H Y st . it '' °' i Exchequer) did DPI i re ou lie _would . not th•cide either one ‘''''Y' 4)r ‘,l o' l but _he contended that 'the lionourahle 111 , 1 , ,; % fe, P c , ...-ientlefil:th, to ta ki n g t hi s es 0 niust tioilesi t lic 1 1 ) favOur of the efficacy of his tneastire' Nel l ', l q lnrikielt not wholly tree tivm prvit ili t r,i;oll I° ci ye . et to the Balls he could have no oui c- I ,,rati'f,,, r u ,' ,, tng again brought. in, and agi" ell , Wif '" 1 I:. ffouse ; -but in giving his arse iig tit, to; u.r"111)1 in, it was his wish Oat 1)1f : t beo r i rriludgvd EIS pirtlging iIitIVICII 10 $Ol-ii /(1( 1 in e ° ',' "tsar his Lelitiird Friend bad. aii Ld " 0 ,, ‘ )4 ,' e T1 " 1 " \v l Polt had )eei.i' made to his sile 041 "; 1 , co' ' ''''''"'i 4 hat be ii .tt something Itirlbt"r,`,oiticqi i'''"'" , ite t Inc Cliincetfor of ti' e ° 1 : 5, 0 w ritcv /' p:' . ; 4,1 VAlty to baling Made