The Sun. — London, England, 1801-09-02 00:00:00

LAW REPORT., ITILDI-1 A 1,, 1:0isID()Nz. SITTI:46S BEFORE Loa r) KFNYON,A:II I .A_SP2. , O4AI, JURY OF MERCIIANT?'S.TM• Cosi.Eß v. GILO-IRIsT AND ANOTHER. THE Counsel: for the,Ylaintiff , bserved, that this Aaiun was brought to recover the.value of a large . quantity of coffee and tobacco of. the Defendants, uho had conceived- they had . a right to stoi these goods in trot/My.. But that pOint was completely at rest, in consequence of the decision of Lick barrow and Mason. It was:there held, that eyeky. hoider of a Bid of Lading for a •valuable.consider ation, had the absolute property in the goods, as, midi:as the holder of a Bill of Exchange with an indorsement upon it, had the pioperty in it. Lor3 KENY . Ok here asked what _relation these parties Itood in to -one another ? _ _• • . The Counsel for the Plaintiff observed,' that the Defendants, who are Merchants at Liverpool, - were the original owners of these goods, and sold them to a-Mr. Horace :Watson, who was a Mer chant in London, in. 1799'. He sent these gpods to his correspondent at Hamburgh, the present Plaintiff, Mr. Gosier. He at•the same: time Sent hint a Bill of Lading indorsed, and Bills of change to the amountof , 32001. to be aceepted.— On the faith of that consignment, those Bills were ' accepted and afterwards paid. Soon after 'these goods Were shipped, the Defendants were informed that Horace Watson , was insolvent, and they znediately came up to London. They made the best" of their way after the goods, and overtook them before they had reached the end .of their voyage, and the Captain, on teceiving minden', pity from them, delivered up the goods, If this coffee and tobacco had been - COmit:g to, Horace Wat son, and the 'Djendants had been informed that he was in falling circumstances,: they swoul,. clearly have had a right to stop them, but,- on the authority -of the case of Lickbarrow and Mason, which".was case precisely in point, when the Defendants had sold these goods to Watson, and Watson had sent them to the Plaintiff, and at. the same time an in. • aor ? ed Bill of Lading, transferring the property, and, upon the credit of which he had' accepted Bills to theamoorit of 3zool. which were paid, the right of the Defendants to reclaini these goods was en - tirely gone'. Mr. H. Watson,. examined by Mr. ADAM, said, he was a Merchant in London, it - 1.1.799, and lived ,in. St. Mary Axe,' He knew the Plaintiff:4nd De fendants. •He 'had dealings with the Defendants, who lived at Liverpool. He bought the - coffee and tobacco in question of .them, and they exported. them on his account to Hamburgh, to the Plaintiff. In March-, I 79 . 9, they. exported 4.3' casks of . ..coffee, and •t?, hogsheads of tobacco. - Being shevyn a Bill of Lading, and. a number of Bills of Exchange; he said he had sent that Bill of Lading indorsed to the Plaintiff, and the Bills of Exchange had .been ac.' • cepted and paid. He sdld part of these . Bills ; to wit, to the =aunt of 2.3001..t0 Persent.and Bodi. ker, anti remitted the rest, amounting to 7061.. to a correp6ndent at Hamburgh. These Bills were :ne ver retyrned on him, floe, which he infer•red they were paid.. On cross-examination by Mr. ERsictwa, he said, the. Defendants drew Bills on him for this cargo, which he accepted, but, unfOrtiinately, b'efore these Bills came to maturity, he had become insolvent. . . Mr. ERSKINE here observed, that his Clients, the Defendants, had taken. all these Bills up : and adverted to the case of Kinloch and f• / . . : Lord KEN ox here obseryed,,.that the original owners of,the..goods had to .40 with a third person. If It; 114 leen - with.the Assignees,of Watson, it wpul:AliaNe been v,ety different, It seemed .to him theilaintiftmad made- out hi“aie. His Lordship asked Mr..E:ASE:ifgE: what lie had to say, tp it / Mr. Easxt NE, itt his.address to the Gentlemen of the .jurY, said they -would observe from the dence, that the Defendants in this cause were thi sellers of these goods to Mr. Watson; They' drew Watson. for the. .of them., — These Lills were accepted by ,Mr. Watson, . but! he hecatne•insolvent before they, came to matiirity. They came on the netendants, and therefore they. cone on the Estate-. of the Bankrupt ;, and, therefore, ; . between the Defendants and Watson, there could be no doubt on this case. There could .be no doubt tbat„they.had. a -right' to stop in fran. situ. 'What was.. the situation in which Wutsop, the purchaser, stood ?. . • Lord Kri , rYowber l e iriterp'osed, and asked Mr. ERSKINE if he believed he could make any thing of it? „ Mr. Gt ass, on, the , same side4 - said,,: his .Lordshiid would.see that his Learned Friend could. Mr: EiSKINt'. said, he was AFerving thifituation in whiaThisllients,stood VVith regard to'iVir. Wat son. They were 'the.sellers, W;it , ,on was the. buyer -,,5 - ,but he did not buy theui to sell "them again in this Centntry,:hut they were to go to parts be, yond the seas. The Defendants•were the , Shlppers of the goods at the time. The Captain gave-the bill of lading ro the Defendants, the shippers; and the goods were only deliverable to their order: The bpyer, on whom the Defendants drew, could not 'receive these goods without the Defendants': Bill of Lading. There could not be any other way devisca by v. hick a seller at LiverpOol could give an authority to his Agent, or to the buyethimself; to receive the &okis" when they were there, but by . making ,a blank indorsement on . the Bill of Lading. The' Defendants, therefore, put their blank in dorsement on the Bill of Lading, and transmitted - it to the buyer, in order that he might send that over beyond'the seas, to give an authority to the Consignee to receive these goods. But, he con tended, it armed him with no authority whatever, to give any .title to that person,,to whom he chose to indorse the Bill of Lading beyond that which he himself had, on performing his part of the contratt. He contended, on the authority of the Laws of that Country, that the Plaintiff, who was the Con signee of that cargo, stood precisely in the situ ation of I\e Ir. Watson himself ; and that this .13il! of ' Lading, so indorsed in blank from the sellers to the buyer, indorsed either in blank or specially to any person., could convey ,no higher or greaters title than what he possessed himself, and that the Plain iff abroad, though .he had accepted , all the Bills in t he world, could stand no higher than the person With whom he had contraeled. In one word, this Bill of Lading was nothing Lord KENYON, interposing- 7 " By the Law of this Country, as laid down in the , case of Lickbar row and Mason, it was established that a Bill of Lading, .circumstanced as this is, absolutely trans ferred the property. And this case is to be decided • by t•he Law of England, and not by the Law of any other Country. If you•have any doubt, I will save the point for ydu.", Mr. ERSKINE observed, that the case of Lick barrow and MasOn, after long and entangled argu ments, in the different Coutts of Westminster Hall, at last came to be decided as a question of fa I, with. regard to the custom of Merchants, and it was put to the Jury: He subtnitted to his Lordship, that this case ought_ to be governed by the Laws of Han:burgh; that it ought to he governed by the Laws of that Country where the goods were stop ped. The •C,ounsel here alluded to a case that was argued very lately in Westminster Hall, where the Court of King's-Bench, in the Case of a Bankruptcy, thought themselves bound -to decide by the Laws of Russia. Lord:KENyort---( In that case thq goods came from Russia ; they were Russian . property ; and the contrad betwden the parties had its first concOc -tion in that Country ; and there it was proved that by the Law of that Country, although goods ~were sold and delivered on board any Ship, if the vender happened to receive information of the insolvency'of the vendee, he had a right to his goods again. But by the Law of England, these goods could not be reclaimed by the Owners, but must be-considered as part of the property of .the Bankrupt, and the Proprietor could only come in under the Commis sion. But this is an extremely different case, irk's much as the contrail originated in . England, and the goods were originally English property ; and,. Therefore, for the same reason that the Case, al luded-to had been . decided by the Law of Russia,. the : resent case ought to be decided by. the Law of England; Wand I will not eprive a Foreigner of the benefit of the Laws of this. Country. ' By the Laws n . f . 'Russia,. in that case, it - was proVed that in that CoUntry in which 'the • goods were, and cOntrad _made, their Laws gave to persons certain powers over their goods till they were in the a.etital posses sign Of: the vendee ; and I shall "not break in upon the Laws orßussia." Mr. ERSKINE said, he'put'the ease in this way— If these Gentlemen had indorsed the Bill of Lading to Mr. Watson, and Mr. Watson, bad transmitted it to a British Subjed, then, as between two British ,Subjeets, the Law of England must• have given the rule. But he requested the Geutfetnen of the Jury to consider what this case was : Mr. Watson sends these goods beyond the .seas--4e draws: Bills—th,c Consignee accepts those Biils at Hatnburgh, mid they are afterwards paid. He has- no knowledge of the English Law. He conceives he haS that right which the Law of Denmark gives. He ac- .cepts- the Bills, and that gives him an authority to :receive the goods, .provided . the 'Drawer and-the •Consig,per of the goods appear to have a right. so to convey them. To be sure, when every, thing . was laid . before 'his Lordship and the „Gentlemen of, the Jury, if that did not amount ultimately to proof to satisfy . his Lordship, he must retire from ,the cause. The Defendants laid a case before the most eminent persons :in the-profession of the Law there I know. his Lordship; will, not, .because he , cannot, receive the authority of what are called, in the Civil Law, .the respanraouttentum. ,And the 'Courts in that Country would not giye . the law upon any point, unless they were required.so to do by a re, :quest or communication with a Court in Engllnd. , - 1 -, 'lf his Lordship §hould be, of opiniop that the Law.. of the .Place 'should govern the tontra6; 'ptit the Defendants precisely same sit uatioh as if they were Suhjels of that COUntty. IFOr the case being statetl,, as he had then - stated ;person eminently :killed in 'ch.': Law of that 'Coun try., the result of his - opinion was;', that the. Co nsignee could only - look to 'the' tide' . of the -Con signer.. He could not place hitiiseir higher than that. title , and therOfCre,, althOtigh the CorlSigile . e .. , had' accepted and . paid the . Bills, 'he - had no right , to the cargo, because the person' through whom he di!rive j d title, had no right to it, not having fulfilled Ills part of the Contract. • Imd,K,ENyemr-t! , ! That was :the opinion Chief Baron E - 1 - 12 first entertained on the subjef.q. But. I inn very clear ,it, must : be decided, by . .the Law of England., And -believe, it is ,the more conve nient rule of trade.; = I believe the convetlience of trade from Cape Horn t?-,the Cape qcid Hope cabs out for. such a' decision." .• : ERsinit-said, it would be satisfadory if: it could be put in some way of obtaining the Judg. meoCof tho-Court Of King's Bench upon It. . Lord ,KENYON--" I VIII • never refuse to reserve a .case on such authority.. shall be. bound, how ever, to tell the Gentlemen of - the Jury, that the case is' with:the Plaintiff. If you think, upon con sideration; that you can make any thing of it, you may bring it before the Court . .of 'King's-Bench. The ,great object, most undoubtedly, of all judicial proceedings, is to do justice: . But another, and by . no means an inconsiderable objeft in the .adrilinis . tration of justice is, that mankind ingeneral should he informed that the Court has taken all due pains to decide to their satisfattioni" ,The Gentlemen of the Jury had some difficulty to ascertain the precise value of the goods at the time they were sold. The Jury, after some conversation on this point, and after asking some questions of one of the Wit nesses, relative to the value, 'found' a liettiltri fir the Plaint if for 2,201. with leave for ,the De fendants, if they should think proper, to take the opinion of the Court on the Law of the case. KENT ASSIZES. 4ULY 2g, BEFORE. LOAD }.ENYON, AND A SPECIAL JURY, lIONEYWOOD kiEWDON. Mr.-GARaow' observed, that this was a Case in which it could...not possibly be necessary to occupy much of the time of thejury, for he would venture to say that a clearer one could not exist. He was happy to see one Gentleman in the Box who had a view of the place in dispute. It was.an Adion of Trespass brought by Sir John Honeywood, nomi nally against Mr. Hewdon,• but the real Defendant was the reSpe4a - bleNobleinan, Lord Radnor, whose name appeared upon' the Pleadings as the 'Lessee of the Defendant. The sole question to he tried was, whether a house which Lord Radnor had built, was built on ground forming part of the -waste of. the Manor of which Sir John Honey wood was the Lord ? That his Lordship had imprudently built 'the house on the waste of the' Plaintiff's 'Manor,. was a fact he would, prove beyond doubt ; and indeed he was surprised to think it. should ever have been contested. In the first place; he had an antient map, made in- 1660, in which the very spot where the Defendant's house had been el - et - led Was describ:. ed as the Manor Pound, and was stated to be situated on the waste of the Plaintiff's Manor. In addition to thi's, he Should'shew, by oral, testimony, that the tenants of the Honeywood family had:the exclusive right of depastnring -their cattle on this waste, and that thebeasts of other personS found straying there were impbunded in 'the Manot Pound. There was not a child in the parish who was able to lisp, that did not, before the Deferidaht's house was built, call the scite of it the Manor Pound. The Noble Lord hadbeen warned not to build there, but he had. paid no attention to the warning ; he had crated it in defiance of the Plaintiff's right, and therefore the Jury, unpleasant - as it might be, must feel them selves bound to oblige him by their verditl to, pull it down again. The title of Sir John Honeywood to the manor in which the waste was alledged to be situate, was' proved. by the production of the 'title deeds. James Dunn, a tenant of•the manor, said he per fealy well knew the spot where the Defendant's: hotise w4s built ; there had previously been a pound on the very. place ; it was called the Manor Pound, and for fifty years he had - known it ; it was- under-, stood'to belong to the Honeywood family, ,who al ways kept the key of it ; the manor of Lord Ra& nor adjoined, but the tenants -had no right to put their cattle oti , the:waste where the Mannt.Pound was, and ifShey'did they were always - impounded. Other-Witnesses were examined, and itapraring clear the Defendarit'l house was ereded on Sir John Honeywood's ground, .a Verdid was given for the Plaintiff, with One Shilling.:Datuages.: •.., _ • • DORE ex dem:. LORD CO-V ENTRY against SMITH. Mr. Serjeant'SHENlElt.D. stated that this was an Adion of EjeOment to recover possession of a farm in consequence of a breach Of covenant by-under letting it without licence frnin'the-Landlord, The farm had been - let to a person of,thename of Bedell, who becoming insolvent, had given a Warrant of Atiorney to the Defendant, to enable - him'tO take the lease in execution, but such a subterfuge could not prevail in ,a Court. of Law ; a Landlord.had a right to ktipttlate that his tenant should not assign Without his,consent, and it Was not to be permitted,; that under colour of an Execution, the owner of the premises' should have atenani imposed upon him' of whom he.did not approve. • The •ftas of the execution of thd Warrant of At_ Torrey, and the possession ,of the Defendant under ;it, were admitted; it was proved that Bedell had 'applied for leave to assign to Sinith, and had been Mr . . AnAm, for s the Defendant, said, there wo - nld be no dispute upon the question of law. Undoubt_ edly, he agreed with , his•Learned Friend, that the covenant in •Bedell's Lease prevented a voluntary, or a fraudulent assignment of his term, 'but it did not pievent an assignmeni under the authority of the Law, therefore, the only question was, whether .this was an assignment effected by contrivance ? He .had witnesses to call to prove that it was a regular transaClion, Lord'iCitviom was of- opinion; that thecircuffi t Y 'stance of the Plaintiff having been appliM to:at cept the,Dgfenciant 'as te,nai'n,. and refusing to do so, created an iosurmountaW degree of suspicion' that- !the Warrant of : Attorney-was given with'. no other view than to Av. g al.le :the necessity, Or his licence.— Accordln 1 the ic"lintiff had a yerdiet in his favour. .„g • • ~.... DUNKS •V. NICHOLLS. Mr. GARAOW said, this was an On - of Tres_ pass,' brought to preVe . nt . an obStruaiOn'tei a way of which the Ilaintiff and his family had been in pos session upWards of .seventy years; he 11A" a map far - bltcicas•seventy years ago, describing the place' in qUestiOn, and the road o'er. Which hecialmcd the . right to pass. It was land ,devised originally by: the, celebrated , Doacir Hervey, 'Author 'of the MeditatiOns among the Tombs," a - tub other; li terary works, to the College Physicians,, and demised to the Plaintiff - J.4 father. He Thonld prove, that . inthe Plaintiff's father's time, 'as well as in o his own, he had constantlyvased over the way in question, tili theobstru&ion of the , Delendant. Be understood it was . to.. be .said! that the Plaintiff,) thongh . . he , had 'a' right: tO.l)liss with his sheep and cattle, had . no right to pass with waggons and car_' riages; babe contended he had a riglitto do both. The firsiWitnesscalled said;' he'kn i eW the Land` belonging to the College or Physielatis ; the Plain_ tiff, atid his Father had held' it for seventy years; he aISO knew the Land .1v ing between that and the Diniehurch high road; 'which ‘v:ts occupied by' the Defepdant ; the, way to the Plaintiff 's Land led' through it ; he had worked there fifty_ . 'ears ago, and there had never-been' any obstructionin !'assing to the Plaintiff's fiekh O. • his eross.ex:lminati n he said he did not renieinbor ever laving seen wag. gons pasS. - . Stokes said he knew the Land called Her. vey's Land ins old Mr._Dunk's time ; fie wa§'eln- •LONDON : Printed by BUCHANAN' NigM I LLAN, (of Bovit-street, Covent-Garden At the StiN.OrFrci, zrz; Strand.;. where ildvertitenfentt, Ordtl.4.i p:oyed to . rive , carts on it ; the gate on the 4 . , church Larnt led into it; always used to go carriages whenever he.-.i'ent to fetch, wood. off the Hervey Land . fif it` - had not been r. way for Car riages, there:won - id have - been no occasion for the gate. - 'the Defendant's Counsel,. Mr. Serjeant SHEP.• HERD, could not resist this evidence, verdid was given for the Plaintiff. EDINBURGH, Auc. 29. ON Thursday a hayitack at the Broornielaw was observed to be on fire, and before it Could. be -get under, was: almost totally .consumed. And about three o'clock yesterday morning, .a • Are,. which at first had a very alarming appearance, broke out in ai• 'Smith's shop in jamaica-stDeet, Glasgow. Attex...• tensivt Coopetage adjoins, which it threatened with destruaion; but, fortunately., from the uncommon exertions of the city Firemen,' all communication!, therewith. was prevented. The principal damage sustained was the consumption of 'a: pair of smithy .. bellows and a quantity of peals. BADENOCH VOLUNTEERS.-011 the t/th of last month, the five Companies of .Badenoch Volunteers,. viz. , the Cluny Company, commanded by Captain DONALD MACPHERSON ;, the. Laggan, 'by Captaia . MAcnoNELL•; 'the Kinguissie,- by Captain LACH. LAN M ACPH E 160 N,, of Ralia ; the Balville, by Captain CLARK ;_ and the Alvie Company, by.Car lain SHAW. ; were inspefted. in a field near the Bridge of - Spey, at Benchar, by the InSpeding Officer of the Distria, Major BA I LI t. pearance and discipline of the several- Corps . re wer admirable.; and. the Impeding Officer was pleases to express hithself in the highest terms of approba tion with regard 'to the condita . of, the Officers and men,' and returned them his public 'Thanks on, the ground, for the very meritorious mamter in which they, went through their 'manoeuvres, firing, and other bUsiness of the day. ~ After the inspeaion, , the men were entertained on the field, and His,Majesty,'Ehealth was drank IT them 'and their friends present. with heartfelt love and veneration.' The Officers, with a large party, Of the Gentlemen of the County, adjourned to Pit pain, where an elegant dinner was provided, and 'where . the remainder of the day was passed with the . utmost 'cheerfulness and conviviality. Many -loyal and 'constitutional toasts were. drank, and particu:ar 'ly their gallant. relations, - friends,- and countrymen in the. 4.zd and 920 Regiments, were remeniberea , with honourable enthusiasm. SHIP NEWS. Norway; Hope, - • ortAvEsEND, AUG. 31. Passed by—the Mary,l-ititale from ) t • B a ' l4 t por o ro Rl* • —, and Baker, —' fr Si j s m ter A , Sailed—the, Hinde, M'Donald, and D iamond,. CLrk, f ° ! :Africa ; Mary, jersie, - for St. Seoistian!s ; vrow; Aorta, P"..1 sen, for Hambro' ; Wade Ham pton, —, for Charle;e t' , l l ' , and Carroll, Stuart, ;----ngtcrda'nflrril 'VI AR R I Ye4terdiw, at the Earl of Roseberry's house in, Park .. .lane, .by .special License,, Hervey, -Eig. of 1.10(L el-Hall,. in the County of Catnahinii, to th,: Right Hon. Lady Duro. thca Arabella Primrose,. his Lordship's youngest daughter. DIED: - - • Oft-• Sunday last. at Lewisham,, in Kent, Lady ,T„,.? 'Nvite of Charles Churchill, Esq. ' . • - ~—.... Pl{ ICE- 0 F' STOCKS, . , YESTEI nit Y. liankSteCk . 163F.73 81. Vntfia Stock Navy 51);,..r Lew, 951 he ; Exchequer . Bitts is. zz, di;e S per Cent. 1797, 974- 1 li!sit 5 per Cent. ~ :Lnttery l'iclipts . 4 per Cent. Con. Sts 'lrish ditto • ;.per Ceirt. Reci: 0,0-61 ,k 1 )illni4111) , 91' ' , , , ; per egnt. C on. 6o f ,silli , linker. 3 per Cent. 64 . .... _ Ditto Scrip Bank Long•A Ditto Slthrt Ann. Ditto Scrip 7 • Mina Ann. Bank (*or Accotint for Nl:tv 'Compts fo,r,Q . aober 6 r 60. if ' COURSE •OP'IRA - CHANGE 4 ,. • - T UE,SI)(t.Y, SEPT, liambargh .;• ' z •Venice Altona - 3L 3 24- us. Lisbon Leghorn - - 54 • ()pito KapleS . - ,:r 4f ' • Genoa• - - 44 42 65i1 bD Professional Men of Education. iti V V , deviate from. the 'general.'Systein 13 / 7 the. selection •Off-i peculiar bi'zinch,.' the Sanction of I, ll g cow', tinued - successds tiv best criterion 9t *Teciority... . • Eight years have I devottal my pradice to the 'Siciisil. treatme;:it 'Ctf! lbtee ..i)is(),r(lers, and the sitf:Ce , SsTUlresult tt ~ - my plan gi'ves me additional ardi - ,r tooppose, as far, as f able, the ravages of those Compiaints..iViffehlard.the rst o itnportant in the Catalotte fitnpan _,• •,„ Alter initiation. intb firatthhr as I,rt•AY:rtY•Surfcc e " * I fornied a wish at an el rly, period• of. L'xii,ekice 7 t(? ' reScire , itr . diVidUaiS Iron - ) . the I, , ,Nbrance of uned4cated well,' or the . equally dangerous precipitaticy of-general Practition, a ,:rs• c vo ' f l e . i h t e m .r y in a ee tte D n i F,AL IN FEQ'I7ION, wltethei• of ;A receqt or lou,• du eery s Pectes of ration Alt:kinds "of Whether 'arising - freot t s i o o r n d?r , !, m 0 , to p rtihsed t v i vreNlEe... the habits of sqliool-boys, or the intlyilgenc'es - mature age : A lid, st 1 yi - ,‘ flat -dent tige:Lnen t EtP file 4i4e!rt itr WO' men ~ vhich, is called BARREN NESS, or sT E R 1,1 - fX • Numerous Diseases are. the result of ig•nofai\ce - , or hasto in,the :near :neat Ora •sirriple,Pcxttorrhcea; ati 'it not: 1.1 21 : frequently happens, that • the seedi - Of Life are I..)iiotied , tht iritisettltiorr of ate tulgainicd‘ flout. y , su; , etior.ill e°. thod such Complaints are easily cured; and, even where, others have , tailed,--Visgst filch I :ru;t:presitirte to offer radical re,-estahlishruetn, • Few, hoWever; are the cases of 'complicated di stress Iv • this disorder, compa.feci...with •the -calamitous .situationsli Men, who, train an indlifgence in a v 14., or Si' preYATent , •gaietiek , ofla ',lcalutfe Th;t. of,Debility, which is the unavoidable consequence pernicibuS‘hahrt4.. ,• . • . , Where the,. utiniiripy,sufkrer broods .over his ipisery, atrefully cone eals his triNfo.rtitne, it inay" some cor* ° t, 'at*, ter hits , to,- kuuw;,„that. although it be an objet • e di,utitet iinceilaicity q' other l'iattitC•ncrS'", the realo Y it these Deficienctei .by' the gatitial `progress of fteno?,"•?; dart, is the auginteittent of my Expericnce. It the r 1 (. of Bacchus cfr Venui be,,,.'an'to,rcittne Manly viif° ll o ;" much anxiety will be oreventfiby_lia Counterao tion of this languid Mate .and in these cases, no gi e difficulty will occur, .- . e t , . B ut' w lie reibis Deficiency has (r ear* evisied.,, - a r 4 u P Perseverance is indispensably - cwitsite to revive ttic befing' Spark di ire.; and t, , re-animate the . Con St it 11 6011- .4 MARRIED WOMEN, who hare long been di,a))1 , 9u . 1 ,10. in their - expeetatins of a Family, may assurtd; ,_ most instances, such defezts arecurabie by Medical skill, •rhe seeresy so esSentift - Vlck„oly and the qualifications which 1 nave presumed to state , • the. basis ot my..pretensiolis, and in ,oincidence....wit ti tins intimation , is that Mt.. may. Its)icol*rhis. personailt , or by Letters (iiklostng., it smallttiPteiT i 3 7 34 ti douse, z,9, Arundel .sire.:et,'S:trarid; near- Toiti c ",, e c, There••is. ;sea:, acidi non .1. Entraznce.in adjoining;'and M. Member ot the hula! C legOol Su rgeo33: ); and Published by WILLIAI AK,arcea Sc,xlrr s' (of HUrse-terry-road, WestrriinsteiV ibr the Zaper, Letters - tor the Editor, &c. rpo,st,.paid),. must be addressed. 4 c , T 1 tAI uOl