The Sun. — London, England, 1804-12-19 00:00:00

LAW REPORT. COURT OF ICING's i 3 NCH, Dcc.. tviiit'iv.'coustrqs. This W 33 an ActtAn upon a Bond for g000l.• The DefetMant had pleaded that the deed was obtained from him by fraud and ebvin." The' circumstances of tliecase were as follows : —The' Plaintifr, Webb, had been in thehAit of advancing money to two peisons named I-tarvy and Suthmire, in the sugar trade, and his debt amounted to upwards of i t,OOOl. In August 1802, he took an assignment of all their property 'whatever as a security. They were also, indebted to the Defendant, Cousins, in the .sum of +000l.; but as Webb had the assignment, -he would have been able to have swept all away icy his judgment and , execution, anti left nothing to pay the Defendant his debt. Under these circum. stances he persuaded the Defendant to hay his, the Plaintifr4 debt, in order to secure his.own. This. lass accordingly done; and the assignment of.all the effeCts of Hari)? and Surhmire was indotsed.over to the Defendant Cousins. But as this assignment of alf the'effeets . of Harvy and Suthmire was in: itself an aft tilbankrup(cy, it became necessary to inquire whether there, was any 'outstanding debt , which could be the foundation ,of a'rmmission.ttgainst them ? becinise if there was “nY StiClA,,anti a commis. sion wet taken out, it would cut down the.security of the general ats4igntnent, and make it onanailable. In point of flift, they Aid . ore . a debt at that time of sooJ..to one Menton, upon , which a commission was founded in May last, and the property intended td be timveyeii by the deed was seized for the gene. cal benefit of all the creditors. The fraud imposed, was in the concealment of this deb , from the D. fondant at the 'tittle he purchased .the Plaintiff's debt, it'being alledged that he knew the faCt, and purposely concealed it from the Defendant. The evidence to support chit; statement were the two bankrupts; Harvey and Suthmire, who both agreed in stating, that when , they made the assign. meta of all their effrets to Webb, in 1862, it was expressly stated that they owed tool. to Men. ton. Mr.AVArttsor, , Webb's Attorney, being exa. stalled, denied all recolleetion of the t:►t}. Mr. CAYLP, the Attorney under the commission, stated, that Wadeson admitted to haves knowledge of this debt. Tile Learned Judge left the jury to say, whether there was any fraudulent concealment or not.—Ver. did for the Plaintiff. DECtMillt IS. iirtritisesivigz iLIA * NIIO36II4III AND A Irtel A L JULY*. WADDINGTON Mr. ERSKINE stated, thar this was an Anion to recover from the Defendant the difference in value between the price agreed by the Plaintiff to he given fora, qoantity of hops, the produce of 23 acres of ground in the Canterbury Division of the County of Kent, which, in December, 1799, the Dtlfendant lviti by contrail 'sold to the Plaitottf, for the fol. I wing crop, and the price which those hops had sidually broUght.. He should prove the Contralt i and that die pro, duce was 98+ cwt. which "told for i7l. Isl. per cwt. being an excess of V. xis. more than the sum stipulated t“ toe Plaintitf's-Contraft. , For this suni,4lietefore, amounting, on the whole produce, . ti about ..7sol. the Plaintiff would fall to have a Verdia. The. Learned Counsel said, that his Client having, some ye.,ry sago, made considerable purchmte• of hops,' both of t his pwn account and. for others, had had the misfortune to he incliaed before the. Court of 'King's Bench for a aonw i rac y to monopolize and collar-et ttie.price "Of that corn. miniity. He was not now at liberty to say that his Client was innocent of that charge, for lie bad been found guilty by the' VerdiEt of a Jury, and had suff.red the. juilginent of the Court. But he was uittrly at a loss to conceive what effect that circumstance could have on the plesent case. By the old Statutes, many severe retittiaiims were im. posed on whatever had a tendency to forestalling ; bill he apprehended that at the present day it would hardly he 'maintained that it' was illegal to purchase a growing ern-. Crops of turnips, corn, &c. were sold on the ground every day, without even a sur. mite that there was any thing unlawful in such a purchase ; and be could net figure that bops stood in any differentsituation... . Lord ELL, Nat:motion said, that it stood in .die Declaration that the Contra& was for the. purchase of the crop on the ground ; it was, therefore, un. necessary to argue the legality of such, a Had the l / 4 1tgality of the art been disputed; and the . COurt been of opinion Iliac it was unlawful, such an alleption would not hake been allowed toatand on the - lace of the Declaration. Mr. ERSKINE thanked his Lordship for .the ob. setvation he had' made. If then there was nothing illegal in the purchase of a single 4n:insure of hops, did it become illegal, when such putehast was ex: tended to two, tbfee, four, or Au* different inclo.. sure+ ? a large capital,and - in.the way of a lair and honest trade,' his Client might have oc. ca4icta for a large supply. If there was nothing tiolawful ire purchasing twenty 'or thirty aeres,, was there any law which said, that \Olen exteniied t o too 'acres Such purchase became illegal ? He ptehentled.there Was not. CQUiti only be on the ground of a general and ektensive ,system of itne. stalling baying been successfully adopted and carried motto practice, that any conduCt of the kind could he impute& The. present, bargain must stand on its .own basis. It was a Contra& for the produce of twenty,4lilie acres in . the County of Kent. ..The whole extent 'of the bargain made by ,the Plaintiff, in the Canterbury Division of that County,. at the: time this Cootrad was entered intoovas for n iorty acres. Yet it was a filet well known, that in the County of Kent the number . of acres in ,hoi , s amounted to about ,fifteen iborriandi And ; Canterbury Division alone tgwvett or tigbtikylmArl.. To argue, therefore, that the Plaintitfon purchasing, ninety acres of this immense quantity, either had forestallied; or could have had in view to forestal the market, was .04 height of. folly. , . The execution of the Contxaft Wall proved by the attesting Witness ; 'and the produce. of the 2 3 acres, and the price obtained' for the hops, were stated to have heen.as Mr. ERlCrlgit represented. Mr. DALLAS, for the Defendant, maintained that the present case was one of the greatest public im. portance; as every case must be where the question . was, whether the produce of the -soil of this Court_ . try was to-be allowed to find its way. fairly into the market,' and :there- bring a reasonable and equitable . price ; ,or if, even before it had been planted, or before the ',seed had been thrown into the ground, it might be purchased up by - monopo. lizers and forestallers, who would thereby have it . in their power to fix on it any price however ex. travagant, 'and 'to get the markets entirely tinder their controul He was .aware, in consequence of what had fallen from the Learned Lord, that he was. not at present entitled to argue that the contrael on which this action-was brought. wait in itself illegal. He should,' however, be able to'sbew that it. was part of, a deliberate and premeditated : system of monopolizing which the Plaintiff in this adion had arinpted, by which he had got into his possession a, great proportion of the hops growing in this Conn. try ; and in consequence of which he had been in. ditted.before this Court, and had teen corivided.-'-- The grounds of accusation then urged against hini were, having conspired to monopolize into'his own. hands the hops growing in this Country, for the purpose vi enhancing the price of that commodity; having instilled into the mindS of the growers of hops, that they were too ..low in priti, and that by keeping. them back frnm the market they would quickly rise and, -as ; an indiicernent, 'having . . in. formed them that a great preportian of the crap was in his hands, and that he would contribute to eifeCt this end. The Klima had the very best a , sistance on that trial, and every endeavour 'was used to .make him resort to any legal plea in arrest of judgment, which he might have been able to adduce. No step, however, to thiS effeiCwas taken by, IPm, and he submitted the: judgment of .the Court. He afrerwaids brought two - several actions op the contraas for growing crops, which he had then- ent , red into. One was tried before Mr. Justice RooKt, and the other before Lord ALVANLEY, :and the .ilecisions were alike in both. The Plaintiff was found to have no right to recbier.. The Learned Carrisel said, he should he able to shew : that the present case stood exaOly in the same situatinn. The contraCt,now sought to he enforeed, had been entered into in the end of December. The growers of Kent were' then assembled to p a y' . their composition for tythes, and the Plaintiff, availing himself of the circilmsranee, got himielf introduced after dinner, and had not been long in company, when he rose and made a speech to the meeting, informing them how much they were int.' posed on, by the hop dealers ; that he - was.come they: more for their advantage than his own ; that the price of htips was greatly too low; and, in con. elusion, purchased from several of them , their crops then on the ground; a,uonduet, every part of which, the Learned .tnunsel contended"; was incontinent with the charafter Of a real and bona /de hop put. chaser, and could only belong to a monopolizer and forestaller., In prosecution of the same scheme, the Plaintiff was afterwards found at Worcester,. in June ittoo, where - hit conduit was equally indica. live of his intentions. There he gave instrations to the landlord to call together, to a dinner to be given by the Plaintiff, all the' persons concerned in the growing of bona in that part of the Country. Not eitaCtly comprehending "he Plaintiff's wish, the landlord invited nut the growers only, but the dealers in hops. .TMs was the fartheir thing from' - the Plaintiff's meaning; which he soon made known to the landlord, who, to consequence of the more ex.' plicit instruftions which he had received, circulated a hand.bill, intimating that none but growers of hops were to be admitted to the dinner. 'At thi s meeting the Plaintiff pot in practice exatily the same line of, proceeding he had adopted at r anter _ bury, and.'many enntrafts for the then growing crops were concluded. For this system th o n o p o . . lining and forestalling the Plaintiff; as before men. tinned, had been indiCted ; and the contrads, so far as then endeavoured to, be rendered effeCtual, had been set aside. A great deal of evidence was adduced to substan.. date these fans, abd the Couniel for the Deferid'nts were proceeding with other evidence or' the same kind, when , Lord ELLENSOIIOUGH said it was unnecessary to adduce any more evidence to that area, 'as, to whatever extent it might. go, it could not 'alter the nature Of the question which he would' feel it his duty to submit to the cOnsideration of the Jury: The contraft here sought to be supported was entered into in Pecember 1799,..and . was for the produce df twenty, acres of hop ground in the Canterb ur y Division of Kent,. in which, from the evidence ad. duce& it appeared there were seven ter eight thou. sand acres. Even were :the itelion brOught on the total contract made'by the plaintiff at cmterhury in December 1799, he could not think that the goes. Lion would he inater,kally altered; or that the sir. cumstance could warrant a charge of monopolizing .to such a degree as to Vacate the contraa . . The conditit of the Plaintiff, six months afterwards, at Worcester, Might be such as toevidence his having adopted a system,of monopolizing and fpreitalling; which both called for punishment from the court, and rendered void the contracts then entered into with him. But it must still remain a question for the consideration of the Jury, whether they were satisfied, that, in December 1799, (Aix months before that period) the forthed such a _system, and, in prosecution of it, had, en. teted into the contracts in question ? Of this the Jury Must" , be satisfied before they denied circa to the Contriet in question. The Jury found a verdict for the Plaintiff.. The question of law being reserved for the consideration of the 'COUII. Cbtlitt'OF CuriMol4 PLEAS. LETTUCES SZTORE 31Ft ALLEN CHAMSAS. AL.LAIIR ro. RYLES. This, was an a4tion to tecover the sum Of 3181. 60111 the nereflOot, who is Warden' of the Nea t (iN Printed bi Recm eats 11AZ kits, (of No. 4, Manlet-oitan w ~ flo-Strmt I ; and l'untisited by PPS, (at sQuth 4:0,1,4. street, t.rchvenur-witusit L r t)t)N A t t h e sori.o” les, No. t ts . iStrattd; whets idvertfte ft y nts, O r d ers f or t h e P aper , L etters fat "h e &N or , &c. nunit arithrstd. Prison, in consequenee of the'e'scepe .of the cele. brated Jahn:' in the year 1802. The o.l . i . tin Was founded opan an order signed by Johnson, fcir goods afterwards'forwarded to him by the wha is a trader at Guernsey ; and this :order purported,, that, the goods, consisting of several cases of the best, port wine, and a quantity of manufietured tobacco, were,for the account of 'Government, and .to the use of Sir Ralph Ahercrornby's army, then on the expedition te Holland. - The Deputy Clerk, of, - --ehe,. Papers in the Fleet Prison proved, that Johnson was a prisciner in the Fleet Prison, for some time, before his. eacape, -- , io me:tarp:veer, for this debt, .and a number of others;. and that a day or two previous to his escape, a de tainer was lodged against him by. the Solicitor. of Excise, for a capital felony, and an Habeas .Corpea obtained to remove him to Newgate„ which 'Writ was returnable on the following Friday ; that the Solicitiar of Excise had given the Deputy Wardee, staid instructions about holding Johnson- in . safe cusiody, whom he represented, as a. desperate , ad venturer, who had made his, escape.' before from prison, and told them 4.‘. to secure him now they. had him." In consequence of this.. recommeeda tion, great precautions ,were taken,, and he w as confined in the strong-room ; from,. which he contrived to make his escape. The loom had two . doors, one within the other, and about two feet_ asunder; the- inner floor, was faced with iron on the inside, anti the lock ~was placed on . the outside ; the outcr.door was very strong, ' and fastened also with 'a strong lock. It appeared that 'the pannels ,o.ver,both do , : s, eight feet above the floor, had. been chiselled out, that over the inner door from the inside, and that over the outer-door] from without aide, as . the chisels were found be. tweet) both doors a and that ,after.vartis the Pa.' stove had made his escape over the outer wall of the prison, which,is forty fectinheighr, and topped by a . chevaux-de-frize, armed ell round with fur; midable spikes, to HIM which he had clambered from the wind.'w of another prisoner by the aid of a leaden spout and an iron - rod which served as a conduCtor for lightning, to , the roof of the prison, whither 'he :brought wi t h hii o a. ladder of ropes, and •tiorlle,fathoms of small cable, with a grappling. iron fastened at one end.. This he threw from the prison. roof across, to the ibrugux.ofe fr;zr, where it caught fast ; and then pulling the' cable tight,' and making it fast on the roof,. he crossed upon it him . . ,‘ self, gained the top of the : wall, and got down by his rope...ladder into Fleei.market, where horses . • were prepared by an acco m pli ce to carry him if. A number of exceptious were taken by the De fendant's Counsel, as to :the sui4 formality of the legal proceedings, in the mode of .fiiing and enter. ing the Declaration, After a discussion of same length, however, the Court was of opinion, that the . proceedings were regular. and the Prisoner, in all respemls, legally in, custody. Mr., Serjeatit &Immo. then, addressed the Jury on the nature of the debt, being a claim for wino and tobacco, alledged to be furnished to Johnoon, a notorious smuggler, for the supply of Sir Ralph Abereromby's Army; a pretence ,which, he said, was a libel at once upon His Majesty's Go. vernment, and upon the several Couunissionets whose .peculiar duty it was, to furnish supplies to t h e Troops, upon the ,several ExpeditiOns on which they might be sent.. FOr although John. son, as as notorious smuggler, acquainted with every creek and cranny on both, the Dutch and French eoasts, where . any, landing could he effeded, was, deemed a very fit person, to ad as leading pilot upon, such an Expedition as that under Sit Ralph, Abeteromby 'a command, and was," on . , that account chosen by Government for the purpose.; yet to sun.. pose that such a man would he employed alas Per., veyor provisions .or wines , or . a Commissary for the supply. of the 'Troops, instead, of, ordering . those supplies throuialt the: usual and established was absurd in the extreme ; and it 'watt ;foil asibsord to suppose that Mr. Allaire, instead of applying in what he mutt know to be the usual channel, namely,, the proper office .of Government, in England, fur payment of, any just 'demand for supplies really furnished for the,uae 'of His Ma. jieely's troops, and as all other persons furnishing such supplies alivays epistle:l, should choose' to go to law with .114 r. Johnson f or , the money.—: Jr. was infinitely more probable ,that ,this Order of Mr.' Johnson's was calculated as a mere cloak for .smuggling the goods into England, at a convenient' opportunity 'for if the Fox lugger, on h oa rd of which they were, should be found hovering within the airohibited distance of the British coast, mind were seized by a revenue cruizer, the Conmantler . would ' have only to produce his written documents, that the good; were for the British Army, and that he only waited 'a fair 'wind. It Was impossible but that Mr. Al laire, Guernsey, arid ',his' Partner, Mr. W en . ham, of klastin g s, m u s t too , we ll k now the cha. rafter of Joh000n ; to c ons id e r him for one ino meta' ie. the light of, an Army Purveyor for GO. , vernment, ' But the true Gel was, that this ,was an adijOti b,rought experimentally, by - some of the accnaopires of Johnson, to recover a compara. tieely small sum from' Mr. Eyles, against whom other iii ,ions to the amount'of 12i0001. only await'. ell the ititle ; for detainers to that amount had been laid against Johnson, while a Prisoner in the Fleet, for the identical purpose of enabling hire to contrive his 'escape; 'and theeeby,to the 'Whole demand upon the Warden of the Fleet Nis s an ' 'and plunder him of his' prope rt y. , Mr. et-J'eaor Stterttatto was afterwards pro.: teeding to Call'evidence ; but the Foreman of the Jury said, his Lordship. had .no necessity io take' 'up more • of the time of the Court on ibis case, as' the Jury saw clearly the debt was a smuggling transaMeiri, - and the Plaintiff entitled to no vet. ditt.—P/obeiif looara;tel. 11411.1' , IRTTI1 y. rROST. The Plaintiff' In this action had given a quantity black of lace, to the value of sp. 18s. to a person of the name of Yurnery pit sell tor him on commission. He disposed of it to trie Defendant. One' Wit. nos deposed the goads were , sold hi the name of the however, said that Toth, r had s + ) l,l dim in Ills own narnS, as CtFOrnifiliun brokers freciently do. The Defendant delained the goods is a set off against a debt alleciged to he due hyTur. per to him. The Plaintiff demanded the restoutiott of the bee as being his property. The Jury► had then to decide between thecontrAdidory statements of the different Witnesses. • Mr, Justice CHAMX B E informed them, that if they should think that the goods were really dis.. posed of on conamilision, the Defendant had no right to detain another rnan's property for what Mr.l`,. might he supposed to be indebted to him. The Jury were of that opinion, and gave a verdiff for the Plaintiff to the full am3unt of what the lace wits stated at, viz. gil. 1 gi. . On Thursday m,;ri ; sig, early, a .young ; matt, a himself,ieutenan b t x o t n h :l b ie r,L l p th ol.: r t es i s n S i e l i r i vl r c o r om a t : P h o c ole iy%so llu n il not e tutu. The te,t s ud)irioicsi ; :i e t,e: ri; rLo;ca'fd.:t:eo,aanioic.):),byd.l.enar6ti:es deliberating some' tune, On `ruesdny Wllil# the I tat l Volunteers•were marching from the Square to the Quay, at Greenock, in order to embark, one of the carried to his loOginga, Privates was obligftti to quit the ranks, being stlil denly seized . with'.iiC way kness. He W iinflicjiiioi 7 where he expired altu3stin.'' stantanen „ t , ly.- . On Mon d ay :t, the 12th ult. about fi ve " CO the evening, some person or persoos ttir window- of a bed,roo l p bel on ging to the 110 . 41.11 pUblic:ltouse;. d 11mm n. Little-B. ) , ,Olfordshitt,• which room lay the deitil body ,of .a matt Mn'''. e rlivid Middleton: the y . pulled a sheet fro,&otr the body, unpinned , another which ,was yr,t,Hca round it, and werc:drawing it towards the witdow, • when fortunately, the head struck ttgait!it a pew, ter plate, which falfing on t he'll vir e by its poi , e alar ms'( the.people - in the house. 00 entering .the "") they found the corpse .with the head. lying nn the floor, and drawn near.w the tirittotv ; hut. for this intrution i , it is*,t,uppused the body and linen would have been taken off together., . CQUAT oF A.NUUST6. )(CS* terday a WiiichM,49, belonging to Wiiice.cb;y 4 Piirish, summoned a mau,, in that neighoelicod , for non.perfdritiance Ut agiecirieni him, the:Plaintiff, one guinea, on condition thlt:lle, the watchman, should hind himtdf and .execotor s to have his bodyt.tielivered to the disposal of 11 , •- , • purchaser,. .or. hi. -assignees, who has .fretriently boasted' That, under the same circumstances, he fhtd ptirehased fifteen Spitalfrthi 'weavers at aluinea fice upim a more seri:.ni% charge,; sq, that lie adj,ti:* a li n ea d d t . nk As er a h N e t•P 'A % v •b i ) g • ' a 4i n 'ng Oifi is Ce 4) r C o ' f iu ki 'rt a h tt e o s t 4 t. a g i a a rt rite.enst:Ort,. dicatiun Of the C7ommissiorrers is undecided for 'tie SNIP NEWS. clic AV !sic NP Dit 6 ; T 7. r . Brown,Passed tobnyi—Gtrheenalassari,ll2l42Bbriutnelit, ‘fyrolimitewS.tii)rl,in.itt tt Ni e s . ric:; kilxisell, (;14,11:10: , Iti r ld Proe.?-7,lloyscm, flow Jr , :' PeterSlitirgli : Anna SOPlii.i, glui:er, from ' ll '° l4 " ll3 ' n ; Lively, Smith, from Stettin; . Martha, Forster, Hazard, firtniers Michael, Mvuunn, limey. COnne. lailitYy (. 0&- ham, S;ittloug, Taylor, and Emperor of 140“iit, Metcalf, from Dantzic. Sailed—the Wa&trry, Way, for Taip'sicis i -alld'Matitt*Elii. labeth, Alselancl, lot Embden. ....—.-----,,,---,_ BIRTHS. . 01 Sunday, in Chandos.street, Cavendish-Iquare, the Lady of. Rob:rt Vyner, Esq. of a SOn. On Monday, e vening, in Russeil4quare, the Lady' tir:friha Menai Lsq. 'of a Daughte r G . The same day, . Mrs. I. old, the wife of Rlr. I. Gold, Printer ',ln Shoe-lane, or twin.Daughtt4s. On Thu rsday lastott his house in 1-lattongirda, the Lady' of Richard Pittilips, KO. ail Daughter. Last night, at Captain Cutnberlege'i house at Finchlcy , Mrs. Cuntherlege, ola 5Je1..,_____..........,......................,—..... /IMBR/E1). Yesterday, the Earl of Ormond, to the Amiable AllO •Parke, et Sutton-Hall. Yesterday, at Greenvirich, the Rev. j. M. Rice, oilier's, hill, Southampton, _to Miss Holmes, eldest daughter of IV Holmes, Esq. of_Westcotribe Park, Kent. • Lately, at liaverfordwest, Henry PaviS, Esq. of Mull. lak, in the county -of Pembroke, to Miss Jane Willionin daughter and co-heiress of Tho:nas Williams, of het Esq. and niece to the Dowager Lady Kensington. DIED. r d On Monday, at hiS house. Assembly...row, 41 2. nu... WWI PeppClCOrne, of the East-India - hou se, Jgc" years. rfikE OE STOCKS. VICSTS RDAY. Bank Stock, t 67 i t 67 " India Stock, shut N avy A Per C.. shut India-Bowls, - • i per eitr. 1 74709 i . Squat. Scit Stuck, ‘- Irish 5 per Cent. #7} ~ OW Ann: S 7 ' 4 per Cent. 7.13 I li New Ann. shut uut 3 par Coin. Red. ia i f 3 per Cent r .,„o ll ° s ' l , f _ ; ,:dki. Pe, Cent. Can shut 7 i Exchcrit t or bilis , Ps" -- 1 pankt. Ann. 16 ii-iotlist - imperial Ann , 9 1 Ditto Short Ann. Cons. for 0 l ing: .. t e... i' 59' • r a g : lii" edesTt 0 0 htpfer R:El : -ven"-Y—Jr:iiliav—e selinquished.:l:4ll.4—if No. a% -A rundel.atreet, SePV } " nr her t r ut a l dice for the Treatment of Venereal complaim,..„'- "of he cure o i f v tze b ,.. i l t e . ric .. iencies which are the consalhe n v — . i:ntloubtial qualifications which I possess, as ....,- I*- o , 3 lc o n i l i; ' the Army ", tlt ..?iit 3i l tChei3elixetl:oQfroSfunrigya°eriCsp'efrrUienceerillt :hSiiii;c,nutiff line, constitute y claim to .that.superiority, which c7i;Die' be uttained ; by the. illiterate, ur even by the most resPor , l a general Practitioner, Whose m ind is h a rassed by attenuo all IITIITICIIde variety of Disorders. . ii r,..hiftirt - The very. lingularcomialaints. of Diaeash: and P-- , - --I „pir Which troth every part of the world l• have heel} qqn, d must have Cinisiilerably condom, ta'nq'perfea'Coltir', . sion of the most 'ciunplititeci Calts. ' . j ..it • • It Diseases arise lions the iiii.liscretion of an ungnan#P, meat, anti if such Cases •of listres§ful clisamkngenjeliiyal exist, as those which are .the consequences of an 'fl a w t iorir vice, can any 'Man assume a better ; title . •to treat thentio.,,, a regular SulgeOn. reigning Allot/la er44liGes Thr,thf 111 - If ment of these, and concentrating his attention stool, this particular point ?' d DO' •,- In recent. i a.xii ut Infcition. all Pain, DaTilicr , 'An - to ol tress may be avoided, and in the fi rst se‘saVsint. torn Woakness, much .future misery may heiprevcmo , 11 1 , to . , . thetneari c i ao ' o s f t r i za t i ip li s ii i i . ati ,_ ett as Will . restoreltealC,h .rind:...au'et:itcool, .. irn " p r o h r r ti Oo n O t.fr incfmsidcrgc heiTlaa „the siliiilte;st. qF s , : 1 4ite in, this line litontr,Lis.atliticzafeeq iihni,iteripieeirlitnoinfoeixigioltti6verZ:r'oo when other Practitioncri have,failed. - ,:e'll'fil iignlTefnnveei,cat.e:TfiLoty'grghteerroi,:tatroci!Lnarmircaeci.Setulavcsitsaateoilolori , t ii. 0 ,01 , ,,,, 0 MARTIN BRSE, hisinber of the. Roy;11 Ct.liep Of Surgeons ; n LOTIJo n ' No. 29, Artindal-Street? Str3ncl, ne ar TonOte-nitt• 4 „fig TIIVC iAn AC1160114 enrraliec in %%ear-street) a ' A P !. •