The Sun. — London, England, 1801-12-12 00:00:00

sons in this . country, and it I‘..ta3 the grind charac teristic by which this country was distinguished Liam all the other countries of the earth, that, with , ..„..... ts, honour Avas known, felt and afted upon among all ranks of People. This .Defendanc was admitted as the intended. husband_ of this yoang woman. He rid his addresses ta.her, and he gained her affec tion'under the 'solemn pledlyt.,' not . in' a few soft words whispered in her e, t. in a corner, which might he set .addle ley {he authority Of parents, but under the solemn vd,v of a future marriage, and that in the View of all the neighbourhood ; and that proMise made ~- - f avelv to 'the father and the mother of this .d yrupg Torrian, and which vas verified by. the De fendant m.,king his solemn oath of sincere inten tio4 tn. carry that promise _into , effed, for he took out a Licence- for the aOtial celebt alien of the.olM tiage, which he could n o have o,htained without, an oain, stating, among other things,, there i w'as no just impedim. art to the marriage; winch i;iipcdi_ ment there.inust be, if .he had any reason for. the non..performance of his promise. Under these cir curnstances, one evening when this young lady had been desired-to fix thy time of the marriage, hhe said, it. was at- Ids discretion,--he presented her.with a.iting, and-also with life Licence she thought it indelicate for her to keep Alic Licence, _because she did not appear to distrust him, as most assuredly. she did not. He left it widi her, and he said it was immetliaiely - to be followed up by marriage. For this porpoehe invited the young lady's mother to view his house, and to see whether any. alter;_ Lions could be made, agreeably to the wishes of the young lady. Now, it had been insinuated to him, that there was a Defence to be.,set up, and that, in - • - support of ii, there was to be some attempt at shew ing that this young lady had shewn : a disposition to expellee, which the Defendant could not, consistently with prudence, _undertake to indulge ; that she was a person of spirit beyond the station of, the Defeo-, aiant. lie should put an end .to that species of defence and argument arising out of it :he should chew to the Jury Itia the only cause of the breach - of the promise of marriage in this Case, after having gone this : length, was 'the sudden whiM of the Defendant,. who had seen :tooter Lady, and . tv whiim lie was afterwards matried. He not only laid this Licencebeforethe Plaintiff, but he bought alsz a ring for the purpose of celebrating the mar riage,-as Ile had said alrea:ly.. But having thus suddenly - changed. his. mind, he was desirous of getting the Licence out of the hands of the' Plaintiff, for the purpose of robbing her of the evidence, as he thought, of the promise of the mairiage. _The rennet- in which .this was" efFened.Was thean,.and he was sorry to be obliged to state it :' there vaa.a manliness : and a Gentlernan_like way even of doing mischief, which this Defendant had no idea of; as appeared from his conduitin this case.. He did not come' forward and.5ay,, , . , 4 am. sorry I cannot perform my promise with you: I have determined . on marrying another woman ; aod therefore the-li cence for our . marriage ,is Of no rise." He not take that course ; he fOund he could not get the Licence away withaat: djceit : hetlierefore pretended to make an apology for an absence Of, some time after the purchase of the, Licence. He pretended that he wished the marriage speedily to • take place ; and to. put this young woman off her guard, he sent a messenger to her for the Licence, —a very .important grave charatlei, dressed up in the gravity of his office, the' Beadle of the Parish. —This was done to inviegle.. this young wo , man, and to make her, give up theLicence; under an idea that he was going to make .artangements for the celebration of the marriage. The Beadle .came, with the grave aspen .which belonged to so grave a charaner, and it was enough to:deceive a.ny man or woman. Ile said,. he came from Mr-. Morrison, and that he .shonicl be obliged to her for the licence, to prepare for the marriage ; upon_ which this poor young .woman gave up the Licence, and then the Defendant said ,to himself, now that I - have got the Licence, I will never see you again. He never did see her, nor her mother, brother, or sisteri-'nor any body of her family : he left,ber without apology, and deserted her ~ vithont cause. This Case being made out, the question_ of da„ mages would be to- be considered, and upon that subjed he would, adopt the. rule laid down by -the Learned. Judge who presided at this trial, and Who presided at another at the other end of the town lately, the substance of which was, that the - Jury would-consider the rank of the Parties, because what -was compensation to one description of persons was nothing to another. NoW .he did not wish to draw the Jury from that line of moderation which was a charaaeristic of JUstice, at the same time :he was persuaded that they ought to be considerable in this Case, wjiich the Jury wouldfind required their greatest - attention.. , Mr. William AndreWs, being ,sworn, said :, I am the brother ofthePlitiptiff..' I know the Defendant jarnea D. Morrison Very well ; he is a baker, in busiilegs for himself, inGosWeli-street, , and has been in business for himself ever since the.death,of hiS father; which was in March last. .My father is also dead. He was in a very resnenable situation. of life as a tradesman, a Grocer. The Defendant was born at the house opposite my father's, and has been there eVer since. The Defendant often visited at my father's house, in hislife-time, and still more frequently of late. He 'came there upcm the foot ing of a suitor to my sister:.• Since my father's death, and at the latter end of April or beginning of May. this year he presented- my sister with a ring—a plain gold ring.—He asked ,het "if that would sio?". She replied ''it would.", then Said, " There: was nothing faraher: to do but, to go to church." He' asked- her, When.shall that be ?" She 'replied, " That is . for, you , to say." 11, said, " Stall it ,be the-next week ?" ..She re plied, "If you please." [Here the. Officer from Donor's Commons produced, the Affidavit on which the Licence was obtained by the Defendant, to.ce lebrate the marriage With the Plaintiff, which was on the 27th of April iBor.] . The Witness, : Andrews, proceeded—" My sister is about iq. years ofage, and Mr. Morrison is about 27, I believe. I have had some conversation with I,lr. Morrison,' while the courtship was going on, respeding.his property. He made it appear to me, that he was worth 1501. a year, over and-above his business. I had also-a conversation. With him, re spening what he was to settle on my siSter. He, said, it was his ihtentiota. to settle the whole of that property on her, tthough(that very_impru dent,. and that there was no necessity for it, Nid I said so to him ; he did not come to any terms of Sq tlement." • t On, his his .cross-examination by Mr. GI n ns, he said, ". My Father died last-February ; my sister had no fottune ; none was intended for her, nor expeOcd by can aver that my father died in- vet good circumstances ; Mr. 'MorriSon was to have married her without any fortune—My Father : left behind him nine children,'aild iny 'sister was, to have no .pecific property. do mean to say that Mr. Morrisoi} r repreenttfd to me thar'he had -.I Sol. clear, of his business, and that he Proposed to settle this on my Sisjey, I 11:;(1 no reason to believe Um to be a liar.; but I thought that was a weak propOsition of his. I believed then,: and. I believe now, that he has isol. independent of his business, if he has .not, he is what You (meaning Mr.-Gibbs, who had said that his Client was A great fool and liar if he said this) hive just stated, him to be.--His • estate consists', ire seyerat houses.-- - -If there was any account between - him and my father, it was before my timei .and I know nothing of it."— Here the Witness repeated his examination in chief, at the request of Mr. Gibbs, as to The ring and, the licence, and abobt the Defendant ,telling him ho was worth 1501.. a-year over and above his bus ness, and contirMed that testi'ms4 . ; and added, thought the prOposiiion of, settling all his prOperr, on her was a foolish propos.ition. "It was- the most weak idea I ever noticed froM are men of brighter,' abilities, certainly than the Defendant.He is a little odd in his manner --I think he is very•odd ,and I think I have stated an instance' of, it.—he is unquestionably in a sad'state at present. '' --He Was stated to Me to bein so Weak a state of mind, that 'his Attorney could not see hint with any effea on - the stibjed'of this Aftion." On his. re-examinatiOn by 'Mr. PAKIC, he' said; I saw him on_ the Mondayrafter it was said, his At torney could not Jeceive- proper instrtia.ions from him, , at his own shop.' appeared then to be better than I had reason to exped, after what I heard. Mrs. Susannah Andrews-HI am the mother of the Plaintiff; I know tl4e Defendant very well ; I have known him from his inttncy. He has been - in the habit of viaiting mily for . .,abOut three; years 'last past, 4* . a suitor_.tO my.daughter. He applied, I be-lieve„,..ii my absence, to my husbari, for leave to pay his addresses'to my daughter: This; however, I only .heatdirom n' husband. I remember in the month of April last, .he brought on the sudden, •a' Licence for marriage with my daughter—l saWlhe ringon the table also ; I said to:hiM, Mr. Mbrilson,. this is a new business it is a matter in Which I have not been consulted. I meant this in reference to -him in not asking my consent to . marry my daughter: He said 'to me, Mrs. Ikndrews, are you agreeable to this' proposal ? I ,said yes, certainly -1 was: He asked me if I would give nij: consent ? I. said, certainly I did, knowing that, my daughter'sN ,affe6tion was -fixed on him, and Wishing.them both , to be happy. The Licence that was laid - before my 'daughter by the Defendant was afrerwards obtained from . her by. t.heßeadier 'Mt. 'l.',lotrison desired me and my.daughter to go and see the house which he intended to -live in with my - daughter after mar.. riage. I weot by his invitation to see the house myself ; and it met with my approbation, much more. so indeed than I expetied, The ;Defendant never yisited - my daughter after .-the Beadle had the Licence. On her cross-exatnination by Mr. Ginrs, she said the Defendant visited my daughter as a suitor, but never spoke, to tue on the subjed until the ring was produced; he never "asked my 'leave-4,ong before that, I understoOd - he meant to make my daughter his wife ; I thought he should have asked me as well as my husband; and I was'ft little piqoed, that he had asked my husband in my absence; for leave to. address my daughter in marriage : I thought the compliment ought, in point of form, to have been paid• to me, in company with my husband, and not to him alone.—The whole transac tion, hoWever; is quite. odd—he has aced like an unaccountable man, as it has turned out he altogether,7, 7 4 l am certain lie is an unaccounta ble' man ; and he has made himself a misera ble man through his own miscondua, and he has very, nearly got rid of his misery and of himself by it.—l apprehend, if he had married my daugh. ter, this misery would not have happened. In 'the former conversations I had with him about marry ing my daughter, I was not piqued, because he had not, brought things to that pitch which he did 'by producing the Ring and the Licence. 'Mr. Justice BLANc.—" You have now got the Witness to a matter of mere etiquette, Mr: The Witness then proceeded.--L" The Defendant and my. daughter never had any difference together —but all on the sudden the match went off like smock,.. without rhyme . or reason. He absented himself from my daughter withdut any "reason.-- I had once a conversation with him, but no quarrel. He had abiented hiniself for three weeks from my daughter, , after the ring was.bought and. presented— After that he came home, and we had.some conversation together. He - acknowledged tha,t he had not - aded rightly, and ,he invited me to comeover .the next day, and see his house, which I did, and he sent for my daughter: We afterwards took a walk together up the City Road, for' about an hour ; and he and my daughter were in perlea good humour with each other. I hate a lady here who will prove that. After this, I never saw him at our House." [She added some things about the Ring and Licence, which were not very material, and there fore, we pass them by.] Joseph Haws, the Beadle, proved, that he was desired by the Defendant to apply to the Plaintiff (in April or May last, but could not tell the day), for the Licence ; that he did so, and that she gave it to him, and that he delivered it acccrdingly to the Defendant. It appeared in Evidence, that the )efendant was married to Ann. Gardner, on the 9th of Aug. iBo Mr. GIBS then addressed the jury-on behalf of the Defendant, and urged, all the topics that he thought of use to his Client : tha: he was very foolish indeed, as appeared by the evidence against him; he was described as an unaccountable man, that he was not possessed of ikny such property as he had represented to the laintiffbrothet—thaf .there waS'nothing 'in the subjea Of getting ,baek the I_,cence, although it had' been dressed up as a great straragenfin the Defentiant for .the ,Whole of that that the Beadi asked for - it and had ir. - The inference' from this was, a; it , was the very (14'y after, the Parries' had been taking' a walk toget,her up ;he City-road, the" Parties had then differed, and had agreed to put ail end to the connettion, otherwise the One of therm, mould' not have sent for, nor would ,the other have•giVen up the Licence. If the Jury . thotthr this a fair- 7 infetence, and he sub.„ mined 4t to be, so, :the Contrad• being -at an end by agreempnt of, the. llarties, -a thing altvays in --the power-of the parties.acy moment before the celebra tion, the Defendan,Cffould be entitled to a verdia. ,But should the inference of the Jury be otherwise, the Plaintiff would be entitled to a verdiCi, and then the -,questiori- would be the amount of the, damages'; and,- tinder all the circumstances of the . case,- he submitted they ought to be small. To sup port that, propositiori, he should prove, that the Defendant was so far from being worth isol. a year over and aboVe his trade, ithat he had in reality no ' thing but his trade to,support him. And he should also ;:), before the Jury evidence that this young lady j.c.clated, that she could not stoop to the drud of,a baker's wife. He did not blame her for .educatiopr -had -been above it ; but then the refusal .of the Defendant to, perform the contral (if it was to- be taken-that it was -apt dissolved by con , ,ent),,- was the less,-.culpable . , and consequently the damages should be less. , . C:ninsel went over the whole of the ;i - , - 2a for the Defendant, and made observation on the-ditk.rent parts , of_it ; and Made 'the - best of the materials 112 had his Client, and then called the Defendant's sister as a Witness.] Jane Gihnore, The Pecendant's sister, ,gave an ac count of the property of 'her brother, with which she said she teas well ,acquainted and said,, tiLit af ter all the engagementS on 'his part are made good, he will have 'nothing to live upon but his trade that he hai but barely enough to [Mill his engage': nients. The Witne!A !Len pr.t . , , ccede'd to gii,%e an account of what she he:11-.1 the young Lady, - who is the Plaintiff in this Action," concernh,g-her ow n dispOsitioO to fill the of a I.':A - ..c r% wife, and whiCh was on the dav when dte ticelice was the Plaintiff . ; and with which : , I:e..:acquainted - her flier. 'The Wittfess said, " The Ik'aintiff, Miss AndreiVS, said to Me, 'what- a aiavish btls,irieE a' ;Baker's is fora .wOriail." She then said, -that she incapable of doing it, nor would She attend to it as ink Mother had done.; for my mother was a slave - to her.busincss . to befsute—l knew the to . have been genteelly brought up, .and I re speded her ;m4 her family-very ` much., [She added soma other, particulars, but this is - the sub stance of her evidence, "and ' we pass by the lest to make vn.iy for what is more material." - . Mr. - T,RsKINE made an able reply, in the course of ,which, among many other things,he observed, that the defence in this 'case had branched out under a greater number of heads than was usual, a bad re commendation to it altogether. Defence the first, That the 'Father of the Plaintiff died insolvent." He died in affluent circumstances.: • Defence the second—“ The Defendant is 11-)t worth t Sol. a year."—lf it is not true that , he is sn, he-told a lie, and deceived .another who believed him, and ought to pay for it ; if he is worth that . sum yearly., he can afford to pay. • - Defence the third--" That he is a. fool"—Tso he may, but that is .no reason why he should dot be answerable for the injury he does another. Defence the fourth—" That he is an odd "main." You would be twelve odd men, if that was a sufficient reason, for not finding a verdit against him. Defence the fifib—c , That he was either sick, or shammed to be sick, when his Attorney called upon him to take instrudions for his defence." He is as well as either of you at present, but .I appre hend he will not be so after your verdiE. . Defence the sixt/.7—,‘ That he is an unaccountable ma?!.',' I say, unless the Law of England has been. changed since this anion commenced,, he is an ac countable man, Arid. Must account according to your verdi6f. • Defence the seveizth---" That he is "a man rz.v4- out rhynie or reason." That defence he has un doubtedly made . out, but without caring for the rhynie, your verdi t will, probablf,..restore him to reason The Learned Counsel then went over all the bb- Servations of Mr. GI Bus, and maintaintd, there was no relinquishment whatever of the contraet this case on the'part of the Plaintiff; . and concluded with observing, °that although he did ,not wish that the Jury should be severe in the annakes they should give, yet they were, as he had said in his opening, to endeavour to• imitate the Learn ed Judge, now upon the Bench, in the trial of another case, ,who was to give and who. was to re ceive damages in this case. The Jury were some of them, probably, _parents, and they would- consider what one of their daughters ought, to have in iuch'a Case as this. That was Ac sum- they ought ±o The Defendant deserved to suffer, for. his condua was extremely improper. _ . Mr. Justice LE BLANC then summed up the evi dence to the Jury. Verdid far the Plaintiff—Pamages tool.. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. BEFORE LORD ALTA::LEY. THE PROPRIETORS OF SUBSCRIPTION*- HOUSE V. THE EARL OF PETERBOROUGH. Tuts was an Alion. against Lord Peterborough, for arrears of subscription to White's Club-House, of whichthe PlaintifF3 were joint masters. Mc.i Fitch swore, that .the SubSeription had first been suffered , ~ to run, up from 1782, to 1794, when he had cooipounded with his Lordship at Bath, taking fifty - gui:leas 11r tzol. agreeing at the same time to let.hisLordshipiS,name remain on the books. Fitch had no recolleaion that his Lordship expressed any desire to have his name struck .off. The name was suffered to stand, and a new arrear accumulated ; and in 1798,, an Allion was brought for the amount. While this wa depending,' in 1800, Lord Peterborough came ,to Fitch, who had then left, the house, to go with him to Martindale, who conduaed it, in order to as, certain whether his rname was on ttie books.— The name had . been, however,; struck out, and Lord Pet,e;boroug,ll inquired the most speedy means of,getting and ,was ted. A rule of tlte Club was read in evidence for Lordship, which says, that every Member who not 1.11.; hig subscription. before, the zsth of Mar' ) shoull be written tcy; atxl in case he did no, F . , before the 25th ct May, his.,nainc should be r over ti►e chimney to the 3 is--t of necember, then! be finally erased. • -4- Mr. o,akes, 'keeper of a Club at .Bath, who 1 terfered in thetransadion, • swore, that Lord peter borough had found the.demand 'very unjust, and' ,consenting to- paV fifty . guirleas, had. ordered name- to be smel l : off, and .:that he had commun e cared hisUtdship's desire tip ii . itch and 'Martindale Lord Petetborou3h. had neyer.attended the Cr frorri the beginning o the-vear d'7B2. , Lord -Al..vAz-iLe•L' of opinion; that the n or?, attendance- was not intteil,d; the only question cs ,.l `/ whether, s oh the Cvid'nl-ce, • rind the circumstance , ' Lord ; Peterborough inte;:dcd,'to - keeP • his name on list,' or to have it struck off? If he intended that should be struck- off', the condutt of the Plaintiff was, very improper towards him. •If he inter* . ' to keep it on, it was ‘'Cry improper towards 0` other Member, to suifer ille'arrens to accumulat e after the composition. "The Jury gave a I.e.r4ja for Lord'Peterboroues UMBER ~~ ~~~~ THEA' t O - 'AIOR On Wednesda On Thursday Katharine Anei cu frida' TiIEATF 1 1 (1. MO} And TU A i it. )(iv savG 4 iieipi)4. WI -LOW reteroorouE," ---- ,Pn Wecin T es il d , . . IRISH STATE LOTTERY. ',',' l :l the Follic 'hild ; and on . TNs' EN r 1 ET;i DAY. gn Saturday. No. 26,181 (First-drawn), a Prize of zoool. t The new Par _Last-ciraw'n 15,564, ',, 1 111r Season;. • ____, iamity-oup! --- . - VW' AiEWS. A new Tragc . ' kYlue notice.) 2 . . GRAVtSENpi DEC. 10. ‘lng Richard, Passed by—the Galen; Hun'..-.ley, from - Boston ; Mary 34 ,„ tl e(tY of Folly Elizabeth, Norman, from Seville ; Triton, Higgins, - 1 , I ,' Sr. Michael's; George and Ann, jo)Vier, fr r omNew.. I ft''''' To the 1 dcnce j Anson, Oliver,' foil Dantzic ;. Accomplished Q'l . A • *l'," —.177- ; ".I:llvnes, Otte . ; kailibier, ; .fipPleton, .-'' URGES: Ranger -- 2 —' from Memel. . ' . c, , ) . VI ES.— Saiie&—the-Herculesi, Ewing, for Tobago ; William Afar'. 4 tT a ied by his s. _ ning, Dixon, for St. Kitt',s ; Gencrotts Planter, Beattie, 0 ces .for il . A rettiu.i:)-; Dodds,-fOrliAn'aica ; Nejm4ne, Nfootiv?, and Guar' , l ef s ', e . A . s, 1 iiian,, , ,---,-, for Martinique • P atm: , r:i, -- , for 'V t.ra cr:2%; ,4 14, twila; Rees; for I,i:ii - ,se:-.; -.Belie l Antfc, —, and Brother"?' Owen,' ior Dublin. . , . , • tie a. ma .! inventor of ~..• . ' • MAR R lElj.. . 4 . ..• . 1,41iy Shops in is °wits n End w h ,y , Del . icacit , On ThurcdJy last,' 'lll EN..tod,- • iti Honts., . Sir Tho:: , - - tf -r,_ , 1 =, • Champnews, of Amport, in •ilic Cot my of flans, Ear!. v.i kr . v i t, i - iiies.niel} z :viiss l`,lin_ltitti , eldest dattpiter of the late Humphry l'.... , ir'' kiihll with by t ich is noto 'chin, of - Sobertor.,_ in the. same county, r-sq, ~... k ita anitlie s L w •OLiTinn...s• - day lact,.arl,,Colnugton, Se ^n Fullerton, lis4" ,of Barton House, in the Colut i -ut Warivick, to Miss .Lout" s N v eiito i tu o c il i : - aownsend, fourth daughter el Gare To Wnsend,•E sq. of-11 0 ' h I 't label " Node - nington Hall, in the same Coutity.:, : - : ' ' ,c,,,•.,: ' . ! On Thursday," Mr. ' Fitch, ,o.: ( Avcly, to Woiss Surricige' \ li,s, No. I ;daughter at North Surridge; EN. of P.....inham; Essex. \ t , biLD. • Yesterday, at. Richmond, the 'from Mrs. Keene, :Whitshea Keene,. Esq. . . • - On Monday, at Shorne, near Rochster, aged 63; Mr. ward Willett, • late of the f al6n . Tavt•rn, Gr Last week, at Maidenhead, .111 R;. Nash, I;vidow of the lat c Mr. 'l'. Nash, of Gonclman's,fields. ' r Yesterday, at Fulham,' Jr. Stidbwv, rhiny years a mestic in the service of Sir. P. Stepliens,..l3.irr. when one 0 ' time Lords of the•Adiniraltv. 0 YE",. i•• STULK.I, ty A I ncita Stock Bills : s s. 4s, prdnl. Fundable ditto prent. N6v S. S. Stock 3 per Cent;. 1751, Ontniuna i it pa , ,... o. ..per.Cetif: . tianl: Inc - Account India roc Account Consols tor Open. 1:411k tock 137 N avyj per Cent. shut 5 per Ccr.t. 1797, 0.11 ri:th s per Cent. . per Cent. Cbn. g4ia per- Cent. Red. 67k#. 3 per Cent. Con. shut 'Ditto Scrip 1 3ank Long Ann. Igo 13,15. Ditto Short Ann. 5 3-16 Pitt() Scrip COURSE Or EXCHANGE t FRIDAY, DEC. rt. Hamburgh - 31 to 21 2 us. Naples • kltona - - 31 II 2i us: Genoa - Cadiz. - - 28, in paper Vence_ Ditto - -39 t. eltedive • Lisbon Madrid - 28 in paper Opnrto Ditto - - 304-, effettite • :Dublilt Leghorn - - .53 4 g t. 7% ~_---~ HOSIERY. . - • COOKE . continues to have on Sale at Lis Nian7 fadory and Nottingham. :Warehouse, No 434, strv:' :an extensive,and valuable Assortment o H SITRV or description, which, for cle;ance, ;I:. • :• 1 has never been equalled, and, he ri.diers fig surpassed. The ninny advantages 'he 4;oss6sses • Other ve:ison in - Oils-line of nil... T peculh: - • ' of periection to which, by . • • . —,. • .on, -mited expellee, he has broug:,' r. ,• allbrd ‘ him'allopportunity: o • of Goods,, superior in ei;:ery.. - e., , son; and render all competition '2 • ' • - • ccomaiodate,the Public, either in t r. expfirt trade upon terms mere al , , be afforded by any other Hotisein the C(IRIOCS.FRUIT. 1. 'TWO New CURRAN IS, ()brained ir° lll Seed; one 1 , Z.3 , (1, the:orner ti both 011 Fruit as large as•sorne Grapes, in hunsites and hang on the. Trees thicker than the leavci. They liave A posulidr brilliancy of Colour, a full tiavoUrdd sweetness, aP brisk poignancy of4aste far beyo 7 -: t all others. z. Three New STRAWBE!ti:.IES, viz. r. The rokee, a . monstrous Fruit, o:: inches 'round,. and or must e:v.quisite flavour. Jr 1 , .r., abundantly that Gilt% ir.:Atieatty fills - a Tile Paraguay, equ:ii to.f.P ve tbrmer in every ; comes later, sa as ro a, long succession. -3 Hautbois, the most a . `,: t licionS of the Strawberi : its very'high flavour, J?" 1 .11 wonderful fragan;e, raise L.; all competition • fof C , ..in - ant Trees (each ,s.nrt six in a bundlc,l ,tos., oil. Strawberry Plants eli sort separately), fifty .buudie for tos..6d: . 140 • Sold at Crocker's, St. Albans-street, Pall- NIAL -- Credit. 'Pay Post-age. • VENEREAL COMPLAINTS. ARNOLD's TILLS, so well known 3 ,, ir t ,over "Europe for their superior efficacy and pec ti ", - e , mildness, in perfectly eracticatinx every degree of the Vel' o e real Disease without the least trouble or confinement. Public may be assured this excellent Medicine is perie,, e ii congenial to the constitution, and mow have remarked tj `ls health having been much improved in other respects atie% l e‘t use. '.Printed Direetions, signed by Or. Arnold, are ine , P , with eacii P,nx, enable all Persons to cure the ,g selves without theknowtedge of arty one. Prepared by Dr. Arnold at Whetstone, Middlesex ;. s N it, in. London by Mr. Axtell, I, Cornhill ; Ward, at his Patent Medicine Viirel - Rmse, No. 324, 1-10 113° , 0 c opposite Grav's Inn Gate ; M. Pidding, his P 3 'oo Medicine Wdrehouse, ,7C,„ • Oxford -street, opposite - • Raritheo lso n. th Sold aby the k,s ;ROoellers,; Hazard, Sheppard,. Bristol ; Mortley, Portsmouth ; Collins, "; bury ;- Harrap and Thompson, _Manchester;. Jones and 6° 30 i1. Liverpool; Bulkeley and Poole, Chester; Pearson Piereay, Birmingham • Steveris . _iri, Norwich; Middleat:ls;, add Barnsbv,. Ipswicii•, Gales, Sheffield; Nuns, 'L• c ee,' Peck,. York . ; Brosvn, Hull ; . Humble, Newcastle: ,„,s; Cambridge ; Slater, 0 x ford ; Donald, jeweller, Gias',, v olv Scott, Apothecary, E dinb.trgh ; and by one reputable /7 seller inmost Timyns in England. Price' as: oil: and - 55.-0 a'ito,t, Duty included. „s, Where nia3; be had, Amolo's Nervous Restorative✓P l > o ) • _..„_ London; sr ^ Printed by B. - M‘MILLAN (of Bovv — i. o Covent , Garckn); and Published by W AR IP `WILLIAM I" 11;' S rl , ,s (Of Horse-terry-road, We s tminster), at N . 'Strand, • To Messr A. Very imme "'Meru bui go. • htfully tirkkiii- T in. r4leot'l ren 4 :3 and dres vlh large 1.1.1 N 1! 11 ni but)) k-:1111:0- Loc The oT ) vernent, tt, p pro erry nu Appi.v to -chltrad, T 1 art 1 i\