The Sun. — London, England, 1832-07-28 00:00:00

./- r:+4 l OM; ist .-• c o - • . • , • - r i o s ' 44 4 - , „ 41111. 1 7 - I Nni . ' , kre Z • ',I9OI I ' I K i l l 0 • 4. m, • •)% 1 - 1 ;,' " ' ~~ i The nett point was, whether the report in question wad accurate ? and it was said it was not. He read it in the Times, and he found not only a report, but a commentary on it. Formerly very Hon. and Learned Gentlemen had favoured the papers with the overflowing of their talents, ant it was not to the Times they were to look for such rutting, such cauterizing sarcasms as eould be displayed by a Noble and Learned person. But it seems that the only occasion on which the Times ever neglected to give full scope to the Noble and Learned Lord's speech, was the one in question. But it was said that there was a mistake in words; the word reptiles was mentioned c now there were a great many of that class called reptiles, only four or five of which had been poured down on the head of his lion, and Learned Friend. Here in the paper was the Noble Lord pouring down on the bead of his Hon. and Learned Friend, one of the leading members of the Court of Chancery, a whole vocabulary of abuse. The substance of the speech of a Hon. and Learned Gentleman (the Attor ne•y (General) was, that attests of this nature might be per mitted whorl some friends of the attacked party were pre sent ; now the Duke of Wellington was present, but it was not to be tatters for granted that he knew Touch of the interior of the affidavit off .e; then the Ex-Chancellor Eldon was preset - Of, but still it was not to be tolerated that such attacks were to be made, who ever was present. But it was said that ninety•nine persons out of every 100 were satisfied with the Lord Chancel lor's explanation. If he (Sir C. Wetherell) were the hundreth he would raise his voice against it, and be ven tured to assert that 99 out of 100 were not satisfied. As to whether the offices were to he abolished or not was not the question of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman (Sir E, S.), but it was whether the Lord Chancellor, when he (as it appeared) temporarily filled them ty, gave the parties tea understand that they so held them that when the offices were abolished they were to receive no compensation.— ( Flear.) That pp stints was not yet answered.—( Hear, h ar, from the Opposition.) The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that the Lord Chancellor had given his brother to understand that the offices were to be resigned withont compensation. Sir C. WETHERELL said that notaiog of the sort was attribUted to the Noble and Learned Lot d in the neih- TO THE CLERGY, LANDOWNERS, AND MEM BERS OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND. THE BRITISH MAGAZINE, and Monthly Register of Religious and Ecclesiastical In formation, Parochial History, Emigration, Documents re specting the State of tie Poor, &c. Volume the First. NO. VI.. for AUGUST, price 25., completes the FIRST VOLUME, price 12e. 6d. purple cloth ; and presents a good opportunity for all intending to become SUBSCRI BERS to commence the Work. It contains, among many curious and valuable ORIGI NAL THEOLOGICAL. PAPERS by able hands, con tributions from Dr. En. BURTON, ne g ius Professor of Divinity at Oxford ; Mr. SOAMES, Author of the "History of the 11,formation ;" and numerous other erni heut and learned Writers, both Divines and Laymen. Rio graphical Notices ; SKETCHES OF THE PAROCHIAL HISTORIES (embe'lished with Engraving., IT superior artists) of Preston Church, Sussex. Hodnet Church, near Shrews- Alderington Church, nr Brigh. bury, (late Bishop lichees) ton. Poynings Church, Sussex. Bt. Alban's Abbey; Herts. St. Budeanx Church, Devon and (accompanied with a descriptive account) an Engraving of THE VAN DIENIEN'S LAND COIIPANY'S ESTABLISH MENT at CIRCULAR HEAD, NEW SOUTH WALES. NOTICES OF THE OLDEN TIME, in extracts from Original Papers, Parish Registers, and scirce Books.— SACRED POETRY.—CORRESPONDENCE on sub jects highly interesting, valuable, and useful to the Clergy, Landholder, Magistrate, Country Gentleman, Parochial Officers, and Religious and Benevolent World. RE VIEWS and NOTICES OF NEW BOOKS. RE PORTS of RELIGIOUS and BENEVOLENT MEET INGS and SOCIETIES. —ECCLESIASTICAL TRI ALS. IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS respecting Church Revenues, Parish Accounts, Poor's Rates, Statis tics, Emigration, Population, Savings Banks, the Allot ment System, Commissioners' Reports, Plans for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Poor, Abstracts of Bills and Acts of Parliament.—UNlVEßSlTY NEWS, Oxford, Cambridge, Durham, King's College. Scotland, Dublin, Wales, Prussia, &c.—ECCLESIASTICAL IN TELLIGENCE, Ordinations, Clerical Appointments, Preferments, Clergy deceased. &c., arranged in tables; Marriages and Births.—EVENTS OF EACH MONTH, arranged under Counties —List of New Books and An nouncements. —Miscellaneous Intelligence.—State of the Funds, London Markets, &c., &c., &c. The Volume contains 640 octavo pages ; and either that, or the Numbers (which are published on the Ist of every — with), may be had of all Booksellers, Stationers, and Newsmen • London : John Turrill, 250, Regent-street; Parker, Cambridge. LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, JULY 28, 18:32. (Jo. 1)A43.) (PRICE 7D.) On the Ist of August will be published, embellisi,t4 with a finely engraved PORTRAIT of LADY GREY of GROBY, and several coloured Costumes, CALTHOIIPE-PLACE, GRAY'S.INN.ROAD. TO BUILDERS. MASONS, STABLE KEEPERS, BROKERS, AND OTHERS. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, By Mr. ROBINS, (Of Warwick Howie, Revent-street,) prietors of several seam-boats had expres•ed their entire concurrence in it. Mr. DIXON said hi+ friends informed him that it was a mass of absurdity, and would materially affect all sea boats. When it was brought on, tie should move that it be read a second time in six months. Mr. CALLAGHAN presented a petition from the parish of St. Shidwell, in the city of Cork, complaining that a public meeting had been advertised to be held at a place called Blarney, and that it was dispersed by a large body of military, a park of guns, and a posse of police, under Sir Gorge Bingham, the High Sheriff, and Alder man of Cork. The meeting had been intended to be held to petition Parliament upon the state of Irish manufac tures, and had no political object in view whatever ; there fore, the dispersion of it by such means was wholly illegal. Mr. HUAIE hoped the Secretary for Ireland would he able to give some explanation upon this subject, for it appeared to him there must be some mistake about it. The people paid 20,000 men to keep the peace in Ireland, and if the Magistrates and Government were permitted to violate the law, it was high time for the people to look round them. Mr. STANLEY could not tell the precise circumstances under which the meeting was dispersed; but this he knew, that several meetings had been dispersed, which were held, not for the purpose of petitioning Parliament, but for a totally illegal object; and, indeed, the illegality of their character could not he doubted. Mr. CALLAGHAN presented a similar petition from Blarney, the place where the meeting was to have been held, which was three or four miles from Cork, and was the usual place of resort on holidays and Sundays. Mr. LEADER supported the prayer of the petition. He stated that a short time ago a policeman was indicted be fore the High Sheriff and Magistrates for attending a tithe meeting in coloured clothes, and thowing a stone at the military to excite them to use violence. The policeman was found guilty. The Hon. Member said there was a strong contrast in the conduct of the authorities in the two Cases. THE COURT MAGAZINE, No. 11. Edited by the Hon. Mrs. NORTON, Containing Original Papers by Mrs. Shelley, Author of Frank. R. B. Sheridan, Esq. enstein Viscount Newark The late T. Sheridan, Esq. G. H. Caunter, Esq. Lord Morpeth Rev. N. Stebbing Mrs. Norton A Member of Parliament Lord Nugent &c &c. No. 1., for July, contains Original Contributions by Miss Fanny Kemble Viscount Castlereagh C. M.Farlane, Esq. P. Burke, Esq. T. Roscoe, Esq. Lord Nugent Mrs. Norton Lord Newark Mrs P Blackwood Rev. H. Cannier Tyrone Power, Esq. Published by Edward Bull, 26, Holles-street, Given. dish-square ; Bell and Bradfute, E!inburgh ; and Cum. ming. Dublin. Supplied also, Monthly, by every Bookseller in the king. dom, price 3s. 6d. On the Premises, LATE THE BARRACKS OF THE LIGHT HORSE VOLUNTEERS, in CAL THORPE PLACE, GRAY'S-INN-ROAD. now in the OCCUPATION of MESSRS. SEDDON, on THURSDAY, the 2,1 of August, 1832, at Eleven o'clock, A Quantity of USEFUL BUILDING -I- A- MATERIALS, including all the stable fittings of the above premises, consisting of stalls, mangers, and iron racks, partitions, presses, coach-house and stable doors, sashes and frames, outside folding blinds, marble and carved wood chimney-pieces, m able troughs, a cari tal horse mill, iron chest, and deed-boxes, stone sinks, clinkers, and pebble paving, Also a quantify of good SECONDHAND FURNI TURE, in bedsteads and beddina, chamber tables, draw ing and dining-loom chairs and couches, window curtains, cabinets, excellent mahogany book-cases, sets of dining tables, sideboards, and a variety of other effects. May be viewed on Tuesday and Wednesday preceding the sale, and Catalogues had on the premises; at Cara way's Coffee-house, 'Change-alley, Cornhill ; and of Mr. Robins, 170, Regent-street. , i f :1 ) • On Tue.day next will he published, p r i ce 2 s . 6d. T AIT'S EDINBURGH MAGAZINE, li No. V., fiT August, 1832. Contents-1. Parliamentary Candidates-2. Auri Pa negyricon-3. Quizzing-4. On the passing of the Reform Bill, by the Author of Corn Law Rhymes -5. The Family of the Cold Feer, by the Author of the " O'Hara Tales"-6. Song, by Mrs. Gore-7. The Punishment of Death, by the Author of Anti-Draco-3. Stanzas upon Raphael's Madonna alla Seggiola-9. A Squire, a whole Squire, and nothing but a Squire-10. The Bank Charter-41. Stanzas written in Windsor Chapel-12. An Improvi.a. Tory Effusion-IS. Paddy Foosbane's Fricas.ee-14. British Taxation and Expenditure 4-15. Lord Mahon's War of the Succession —l6. Some late Passages in the Life of John Bull, Esq.-17. The Twelfth of August--18. Poor Gyp-19. Louis Philippe -20. Miss Martineau's Illustrations of Political Economy -21. The Despots' Challenge to Germany-22. A Johannic-23. The Days of the Week-24. Tait's Common Place Book-25. Sum mer-26. Sonnet-27. Monthly R-gister, &c. Printed for William Tait, Edinburgh; Simkin and Marshall, London ; and John Cumming. Dub'in. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. p pers. ROUSE OF LORDS, JULY 27. Mr. BERNAL an , l others from the Commons brought up the Prisoners' Removal (Ireland) Bill—the Russian Dutch Lnan Bill—the Tax Cart Bill—and the Charitable Institutions Bill. Mr. Tomlins from the Treasury, presented copies of the correspondence with the Post Office. ATLAS ASSURANCE COMPANY. LIFE DEPARTMENT. Persons ass ure d for the whole term of Life in Great Britain or Ireland respectively, will have an addition made to their Policies every seventh year, or an equivalent re duction will be made in the future payments of Premium, at the option of the Assured. The following Table shows the Total Additions made to Life Policies for 1,0001. effected in London or through an Agent in Gnat Britain, which had he. n in force for the Fourtee n Years ending at Christmas 1830. 'The Duke of RICHMOND presented a petition from Galway against a clause in the Irish Reform Bill. The Earl of RADNOR presented several petitions from parishes in Ireland against tithev. - On the Russian Dutch Loan Bill being read a first time, Earl GREY hoped there would be no objection to its being read a second time on Mon:lay. The Militia Bill next went through a Committee, and was ordered to be read a third time on Monday. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE presented a petition from Derby against slavery. The Report of the Committee on the Irish Reform Bill having been presented at twen'y minutes past five o'clock, The Duke of WELLINGTON said the House had not for some days past btlgtin business so etrly; he therefore hoped a quarter of an hour would be eiven, in order that Noble Lords who intended to take part in the debate on this Bill might have time to arrive. Mr. STANLEY said the two subjects were wholly un connected with each other ; as to the story of the policeman he had never heard of it before, and it appeared to him highly incredible. The Government did not wish to pre vent any persons from attending a meeting called bona fide to petition for a redress of grievances; but it was well known, the object of most of the meetings respecting Irish tnanu'actuies was to compel persons to bind themselves to purchase goods only of Irish manufacture, and to exclude, under pen ilties, any person from buying English goods. That was decidedly an illegal object. After some observations from Mr. Riilinvarr and Mr. CALJAGIIAN, the petition was ordered to be printed. THE LORD CHANCELLOR. THE Late J. ABERNETHY, Esq., Surgeon, &c.—His ANTIBILIOUS PILLS, prepared by Dr. USON. These Pills are the most effica cious remedy ever discovered in Aledicine, for removing Obstructions of the Liver, Stomach, Bowels, and Kid neys. Their operation is gentle and certain, and they may be taken at all seasons, under all circumstances, and by the most delicate individuals, without the slightest risk of cold, or inconvenience of any kind. The symptoms which generally arise from disorders of the above-named organ', are pain in the limbs and shoulders ; fulness, distention, and pain about the sto mach and bowels; pain in the loins; turbid and scanty urine; numbness and cramp of the thighs and legs; the countenance and skin generally of a dingy appearance; restless nights, and the spirits at times very low. His STOMACHIC DIGESTIVE PILLS, prepared by Dr. USON.—These Pills are a mild and stimulating aromatic, tending beyond all other medicines to invigorate and restore a weakened state of the digestive organs. In all diseases which arise from disordered digestio-, such as headache, fl tulency, lowness of spirits, acidity of the stomach, it regularity of the bowel-, loss of appetite, dis turbed rest, cramp, spasms, &c. &c. Dr. Uson has ad ministered no other medicine during a practice of fife n years, partly in Europe, but chiefly on the American con tinent. They are equally beneficial to both sexes, and may be given to weak and delicate children. They are also most admirably adapted for females at a certain period of life. Age at Amount add ecl w Sum Annual Commence- payable at the Assured. Premium. Party's death.; c..> ment. _____ ---1 ... £ lOO O £2l 15 10 20 £230 Q 1000 21 0 10 1000 30 '2 25 '; 236 26 14 244 woo 29 16 4 35 256 4 100 0 33 19 2 40 278 1000 3.4 19 '2 45 304 4 .3 1 1000 45 6 8 50 340 a°l lbw 00 0 53 ' 3 4 55 382 1 _63 13 4 CO 449 Earl GREY assented to this request. At half-past live o'c'ock Earl GREY remarked it was row time to proceed with the business, and if anything was intended to be said on the Bill, the discussion would betaken on the third reading. The report was then brought up, when The Duke of WELLINGTON proposed a clause re lative to the rights of freemen in cities and boron 'he. We understood tire purport of it to he, to continue the right to all children of freemen born before the paring i.f the Act This was a principle admitted in the English Bill, and if it was right for England, he did not see why it should not be so for Ireland. —........ . it i —1 Equivalent Reductions have been made in the future Payments of Premium, where the parties assured have de aired to have the amount of surplus Premiums so applied. T 6 rem valuation will be made at Chriomas 1837, and Polices rffected before that date will participate in propnrti..n to the time they may then h .ve been in force. value Th e Company purc h ase t h e i r P o li c i es at an equitable FIRE DEPARTMENT. In addition to the benefit of the late Reduction in the Rates of Premiums, this Company offers to Assurers the adv antage of the psyment of Rent of Buildings rendered a ntenantahl e by Fire. The Company's Rates and Proposals may be had at the Office in London, or of any of the Agents in the Country. who are authorized to report on the appearance of Lives proposed for Assurance. This clause was opposed by Lord MELBOURNE, and supported by the Earl of RossLYw and the Marquis of BUTE After a long discussion on the subject between the Duke of WELLINGTON, Lords PLUNKET and RODEN, The Earl of HARROWBY suggested that the clause be postponed till the third reading, which was agreed to. Lord RODEN, before the Report was received, was anxiouq to know whether the rights of freemen were to be preserved in Ireland as they were in England Earl GREY answered in the affirmative. The Report was then received, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time on Monday. The House then adjourned. HENRY DESBOROUGH, Secretary. Cheapside, London, July 23, 1832. CARINET MAKERS' SOCIETY, 71, LEADEN HALL-STREET. 14R. THU RNEL L respectfully solicits the Nobility and Gentry to inspect the largest and best-selected Stock of Cabinet and Upholstery Goods in England, at the CABINET-MAKERS' SOCIETY, 71, L eadenhall-street, City, which Society is enrolled agree ably to Act of Parliament, and founded for the support and encouragement of industrious Mechanics, who all com bine to produce only the very hest Articles, provide for its Members in sickness, old age, and burial, and for survivors at death. By order of the Trustees, THOS. HASLER, Secretary, pull 71, Leadenhall.street, City. size mahogany four- , Servants' chest of Post b edstead £3 15 6 drawers Z2 2 0 Ditto tent bedstead l6 6 Mahogany Pembr o ke ...Ditto with furniture 315 6 table ll6 0 zOrdered straw mattress IMahogany dining table 33 0 ..to . tit ............... . ........ 1 1 'Eight mahogany chairs 5 10 0 'lair mattress to tit ... .. 11 0, Ditto sofa to match 6lO 0 Featherbead, free fromj I Cellaret sideboard 6lO 0 Thredust "'••••"••••••• ••• 310 6 Pedestal ditto ... ........ lO 10 0 e feet six featherbed 2 12 oSet of tour feet mahogany our feet six hair mattress 2 10 0, dining tables, 11 feet Four feet six best ditto, - ' 6 long 14 10 0 in tick }our feet six flock bed , Music stool, in morocco... t 5 0 and bolster .. Six japanned • ch . airs in oil, i Butler's ditto any colour .. . .............. I 6 0 Eight Trafalgar chairs 10 10 0 Best japanned dressing 'Ditto drawing-rcom, each 018 0 table .................. 0 16 0 Drawing room couch ~•• 5 5 0 Ditto wash - hand ... () 16 0 Best horse-hair cushion 05 6 Common ditto OB 0 Common ditt0......... 64 6 Ditto dress'a table OB 0 R osewood tables, in 100, Three feet .rest maho- t card. and sofa 19 0 0 gany drawers 2 19 0, Ditto ditto 2l 10 0 'three teet six ditto 316 0 , Elegant drawing-room Mahogany box glass, two curtains 6 6 0 drawers Ol5 0, Rosewood caddies, of Mahogany ni g ht conve I f ancy woo d , from 18s. to 1 8 nience 1 4 0 Imitation ditto, Canter_ Ditto with three steps Ditto bidet and pan Ditto ditto Bed-room sofa bedstead, ! fonier mattress to fit, with t o p 3 8 6 Ditto ditto 3 10 0 trench bedstead, ja- I Lady's work table, ma ~. panned 2 20, hog a ny 1 15 0 *samboo tent bedstead,,.. 1 12 Oi Ditto, silk and fringed 3 3 0 five feet mahogany four. Large winged wardrobes post and fur n it ure, j apanned book shelves 0 6 0 Er•ench draperies and Rosewood ditto silk fringe 14 14 (1 Loo tables... (upwards)... 6 0 0 All featherbeds warranted free from dust and smelL •-• •• • 054 Furniture taken in exchange CHOLEtA. THE following are Important Facts, with which the Public, at the present moment, ought to he,. fully acquainted. rirst,—That BETTS'S " PATENT FRENCH DISTILLED BRANDT" is the only known pure Spirit in the World ! S econdly, —That while it possesses all the valuable pro perties which characterise the fine,t Cognac Brandy, it is free from those acids which that spirit is known to contain, and which are now so desirable to he avoided. Thirdly, —That unlike other Spirits, the Patent Brandy will not produce nausea or head. ache ; but, on the con trary, from its essential purity will be found congenial to the most delicate constitution, and an invaluable sub stitute to persons of bilious and mitt digestive habits. Fourthly, —That as an ordinary beverage, diluted in the Proportion of six to one, (as recommended by the first Physicians), it is beyond all calculation preferable to malt and other fermentable liquors, while its moderate price brings it within the reach of nearly every class of Consumers. Fifthly,—That all the faculty who are acquainted with the transcendant merits of the Patent Brandy, recommend it in preference to French Brandy for medicinal purposes. Sixtbly,—That it has been analyzed by a great number of the most celebrated Chemists, whose opinions are una nimous as to its decided superiority, and from whose F certificates the two following extracts are made : "om JOHN THOMAS COOPER, Esq., L ecturer on Che mistry at the Medical School in Aldersgate-street " Your Brandy is free from unconabined acid and as ' tringent matter, which exists more or less in most of ".the Brandies imported from France." " To Mr. Betts," prom JOSEPH HuME, Esq., of Long Acre, Chemist to his Majesty— " I am bo un d to say, and do assert i t w i t h confidence, " that for purity of spirit, this cannot be surpassed, and that your Patent Brandy is also quite free from those 4 : acids which, th ough minute in quantity, always coma ` minate the Foreign Spirit." "J. T Betts, E-q." J. T. BETTS .end Co, deem it expedient to state, that their only listaolishinent is at No. 7, Sinithfidd-bars, (leading to St. John.street,) where the Patent Brandy, tlitt. Pale or Coloured, may be bad in quantities of not than two gallons, at 18s. per imperial gallon. kl •BiewA liberal dimunt t 9 the trade. Abernethy's FAMILY APERIENT MIXTURE, the safest and mildest aperient known; an invaluable remedy for persons leading a sedentary life, cholera, di.rrhcea, &c. Sold wholesale and retail (by Dr. Uson's appointment) at the proprietor's, J. Fleming, 8, Holborn-bars ; Sanger, 150, Oxford street; Johnston, 63, Corohill ; Prout,226, Temple-bar ; Fisher and Wagstaff, 76, New Bond-street ; Swine, 14, Edgeware-road ; Cave, 27, Bridge-street, Westminster; Stirling, 86, High-street, Whitechapel ; an I at all the wholesale and most retail houses in Town and its vicinity, and also throughout the United Kingdom. N. B.—None are genuine unless signed by both Dr. Uson and John Fleming on the outer wrapper, also in tke direction paper which is enclosed with each medicine. Ask for Abernethy'. Pills and M x.are, as prepared by Dr Uoon. BRITISH COLLEGE OF HEALTH, KING'S CROSS, NEW ROAD, LONDON. CURE OF ASTHMA OF THIRTY YEARS' STANDING TO MR. HAYDON, No. 5, FLEUR-DE-LIS.COURT, NORTON.FALGATE, Sla,•-••I wish to make known to my fellow-sufferers the benefit I have derived from Morrison's Universal Vege table Medicine, under your advice, for which I never can be thankful enough. For thirtent or fourteen winters I could not lie down in my bed, and scarce able to breathe ; but, thank God, the last winter, by taking your Medicines, I have been able to enjoy my bed and sound sleep, and now able to follow my business—that of a shoemiker; and, from what I have experienced myself, I shall always be glad to communicate to any one that is afflicted, for I am certain the Medicine will cure any disorder if persevered in, and I actually would not be without the Pills if any one would give me 100 sovereigns. I shall conclude by wishing you, Sir, and all concerned in this good cause in relieving the sufferings of your fellow- crea t ures , G o d' s blessing. SAMUEL WILSON. 111, Brick-lane, Shoredit c h, J uly 24, 1832. P.S. I sh ou ld have mentioned I found the Powder of great benefit in regard to my breath. CURE of DEAFNESS and LOSS of SPEECH. TO MR. HAY DON, HYGEIAN AGENT, No. 3, FLEUR. DE-LIS-COURT, NORTON FALCATE. SlR,—Having received great benefit from the use of Morrison's Universal Vegetable Medicir,e, under your direc tions, I send you a f•w of the particulars of my complaint, that other sufferers like myself, who may be thinking their cases hopeless, may be led to take your advice, aed they will be sure to get well. When three years old, I was try a gust of wind knocked down four steps by a large door striking me on the head, of which I never got the better, having lost my senses for a long time, and never thought to hear any more, having at the time my head so dread fully injured; and after every advice from the first of the faculty had been resorted to without any good effect, I was led to try the pills you directed me, and saying if I would give them a fair trial, they would cure me ; and, thank God, although I have not taken the medicine more than eight or nine months, I can now hear as well as any one. Before I took these Pills, I never was free from dreadful pains in my head, with loss of speech, and now, thanks to the Almighty, I am as well as any person, having got my speech and hearing. You are at liberty to make what use you please of this, and I shall be glad to give particulars at any time, and subscribe myself, under God's blessing, (wishing you and all who are engaged in your good cause every success), Your debtor for health, SARAH GREGORY. 2, Spitt-street, Spitalfidds, July 23, 1832. The " Vegetable Universal Medicines" are to be bad at the College, New-road, King's-cross, London ; at the Surrey Branch, 96, Great S urrey - street, Blackfr i ars; at Mr. Field's, 16, Air-street, Quadrant ; Mr. Chappel's, Royal Exchange ; Mr. Walker's, Lamb's Conduit-passage, Red Lion-square; Mr. J. Lofts, 10, Mile End-road ; Mr. Bennett's, Covent-garden-market ; Mr. Haydon's, Fleur iie-lis-court, Norton Falgate ; Mr. Haslett's, 118, Rat highway ; Messrs. Nurbury's, Brantford ; Airs. Stepping's, Clare-market; Messrs. Salmon's, Little Bell alley ; Miss Varral's, 24, Lucas-street, Commercial-road ; Mrs. Beech's, 7, Sloane-Kin:ire, late of Sloane-street, Ch e i. sr!' ; of Mr. Ctiapple, Royal Library, Pall-mall; M r . Coverley, Bow-bridge, Stratford; Mr. Kir lam, 4, Boling broke-row, Walworth ; of Mr. Pain, 64, Jermyn-street ; Mr. Howard, Hair-dresser, Richmond ; Mr. Meyar, May's-buildings, Blackheath ; Mr. Griffiths, Wood Wharf, Greenwich; Mr. B. Pitt, 1, Cornwall-road, Lambeth; Mr. J. Dobson, 35, Craven -street, S:rand ; Mr. Oliver, Bridge s. eet, Vauxhall; Mr. J. Monk, Bexley Heath; Mr. T. Stokes, 12, St. Roman's, Dartford ; Mr. Cowell, 22, Terrace, Pimlico; Mr. Parfitt, 96, Edgware road; Miss C. Atkin-on ; Mr. Taylor, ilairw ell ; Mr. Win. Lake, bookseller, Uxbridge; and at one Agent's in every princi pit town in Great Britain and Ireland, the I,lan& of Guernsey • dud Malti, and throughout the whole of the United States of America. N. B.—The College will not be answerable for the con sequences of any Medici nes a id by any Chemist or Drug gist, as none su c h are aUowed to sell the " Universal Noliciraes." HOUSE OF COMMONS, JULY 27. Mr. WRIGHTSON presented a petition from a con gregation of Unitarians in Hull, in favour of the Govern. ment plan of education in Ireland.—Ordered to be printed. Colonel EVANS presented a petition from Rochdale, praying that certain alterations might be made in the Bill now before the House for the consolidation of the High way Acts, with a view of preserving the ancient footways. He alas) presented a petition from the owners and masters of fishing vessels belonging to Rye, respecting the mode of licensing fishing boats. The Hon. and G tllant Officer then moved for returns, allowing the number of rated inhabitints of the parish of St James's who had paid their rates and assessed taxes on or before the 20th July. Mr. BRISCOE said that the position of a portion of the electors under the Reform Bill was such, that they would not be able to avail themselves of the provisions of the Bill, in consequence of the shortness of time allowed them to pay up their rates and taxes. He hoped his M jesty's Government would take the subject into their consideration with a view to extend the time.—. The mo tion was then agreed to. Mr. STRUTT presented a petition from the town of Derby for the abolition of Negro Slavery. Mr. CHAPMAN presented a petition from a parish in the county of Westmeath, against the Tithe Bill. Lord SANDON presented a petition, signed by 1,700 merchants, &c. of Liverpool, praying that the rights of the West India planters might be preserved when the question of the Abolition of Slavery came under discussion in the House. The petition was ordered to be printed. The Noble Lord moved for a return of the number of vessels, and the aggregate tonnage, distinguishing British from foreign, which entered the port of London with cargoes from foreign ports between the sth July 1831 and sth July 1832, showing those which had imported corn. Mr. DIXON presented two petitions from the pro prietors of the Glasgow Railway, and from the inhabitants of Garnkirk, againat a clause in a Bill now before the House which imposed a tix on steam-carriages. Sir CHARLES WETHERELL thought it exceed ingly unjust that a tax was laid upon the common strge coaches, and not upon coaches of other descriptions. If no tax were to be impored upon steam carriages, it would only be fair to take off the tax from the other coaches. Mr. JEPHSON thought that a fair trial should be al lowed the steam-carriages, before a tax was imposed on them. Mr. WARBURTON deprecated this tax on an inven- tion which was quite new, and ought to ree, ive every encouragement. When they heard of the Americans run ning steam from Baltimore to the Ohio, they should do all they could to kee p up in the race with that country. This would operate almo, , t as •a prohibition against the use of steam carriages. _ _ Mr. SPRING RICE said, it was by no means intended that the tax placed on passengers by rail roads should be equal to that on passengers by stage coaches. Mr. HUME could not but repeat his objections to taxes on any species of communication; in his opinion it was impolitic, and ought not to be continued. The establishment of rail-roads would not be injurious, he be lieved, on the proprietors of stage coaches, as any defi ciency would be made good by the cross-road communica tions. Even if it were injurious, such was the facility it would give to communication that it ought not to be trammelled.—(Hear, heir.) The Honourable Member thought the Bill ought not to be proceeded with till the House had been furnished with further information on the sot:jut. It Lord Altborp thought he could impose dutesi on rail-roads, he would find himself very much mistaken. Mr. HODGSON was not one of those who would give a preference to steam communication at the expense of horses and stage coaches. Mr. ROBINSON deprecated any favour being extended ;owards rail-roads. Mr. DIXON was surprised that the Right lion. Mem ber opposite should think of putting horses and stage • coaches in competition with steam-carriages. He was firmly persuaded the Noble Lord (Althorp) would never be permuted by the country to raise a tax on steam-power. Lord ALTHORP had no wish whatever to put steam carriages on railroads on the same footing with stage coaches. If it could be proved to him that the proposed tax would check steam communication he would never press it. Mr. HUME said he would undertake to pr.ive that it would. n D B I l 1 0 . N presented two petitions from the owners of bteau k -b uats on t h e C lyde, aga i nst t h e S team-boat Dia- Alderman WOOD, in defending the Bill, snid the KO. Urn the Order of the Day being called on for the Chancellor of the Exchequer to make his usual financial statement, Sir EDWARD SUGDEN rose and entreated the per mission of the House to make a few observations, before the financial statement was entered upon, upon what he understood to have fallen from a Noble and Learned Lord elsewhere last night.—(Hear.) That Noble and Learned Lord, he (Sir Edward Sugden) had no hesitation in saying, had made use of expressions towards him which no Gentleman who had a regard for his own per. sonal honour, or who, if devoid of personal honour, if he were acting under p rsonsl fear, would have dared to have used towards another Gentleman in his presence. Those expressions were so far removed from what one met with in society,—so far removed from what he could have supposed would have fallen from the Noble and Learned Lord, in his exalted situation, and in a place in which he ought to have set an example of decorum— expressions so degrading to the person who had used them— Mr. STANLEY rose to order. He conceived the course the Hon. Gent, had taken was totally at variance with the rules of order of that House. If a charge was made against an Hon. Gentleman of that House respect ing his conduct there, no doubt that lion. Gentleman had a right to defend hiuisell from such an attack ; but if the House were to be entertained by listening to strong ex pressions made use of by an Hon. Member against what he conceived to have been strong expressions used by a Noh!e Lord elsewhere, then the mutual respect which was due to both Houses of Parliament, and the dignity of their proceedings, must for ever be at an end, particularly as the Hon. and Learned Gentleman had given notice for another day, on which he meant to enter into the charges he had now alluded to. He (Mr. Stanley) thought it would be much better for the Learned Gentleman to avoid entering upon the subject at present, particularly in his now excited state of feelings. Sir EDWARD SUGDEN said he could not understand the meaning of the interruption he had received from the Right Honourable Gentleman. He ventured to say that no one on the part of the party to whom he alluded, had felt the slightest regret at the language that was used against him in another place.—(Hear, hear.) The SPEAKER believed the Hon. and Learned Gen• tleman was out of order, and that what the Right Hon. Gentleman had mentioned as the rule of the House, was undoubtedly that which the House ought to attend to. If the Right Hon. Gentleman had intended to comment on what he understood to he imputations which some men might conceive to be applicable to the Honourable and Learned Gentleman, but which he could not show were applicable to him, the Hon. and Learned Gentleman had undoubtedly a right make such a representation. Sir E. SUGDEN was always obedient to the orders of the House, but since he had been in that House he had never heard an attempt made on the part of any one to prevent an offended Member, when that Member belonged to the party to whom he now alluded, from defending himself.—(Cries of " Hear, hear.") That right bad now been denied to him.— He had been deeply offended. It was utterly impossible for any Gentleman to offend another more than he had been on the present occasion ; and yet by tie inter. position of the Right Honourable Gentleman he had been prevented from doing justice to himself.—(Hear.) He (Sir Edward Sugden) had never used language towards that Noble and Learned Lord which he might not have heard with every possible composure. The Noble Lord presided in the very Court in which he (Sir E.) practised. In that situation he was entitled to demand respect from him; but from henceforth he should respect the office, not the person, and would always have to feel that he was ad dressing a man in that Court who had forgotten to act as a gentleman or as a man. He deeply felt that in his absence words should have been levelled at him such as bad been used—his conduct had not railed for it. He was a very humble person, but the language that had been used was painful to one's feelings, diskireeable to one's children, occasioned sorrow to one's fri,nds, and he for once, and for ever, declared that he bad lost all personal respect for the man from whom such language could have proceeded. Mr. STANLEY begged to be allowed to set himself right with the House. He really had no wish to prevent explanation. But there was a personal charge made against the Lord Chancellor—an injurious and disgraceful charge, if true ; and, if not true, why then he would say that it was such a charge as ought not to be made without the fullest and fairest deliberation.—(Hear, hear.) After the Hon. and Learned Gentleman had given notice of a motion on the subject, the Lord Chancellor in the other House took the opportunity of vindicating himself, and proved to the satisfaction of every one present that the charge was without the slightest foundation.—(Cries of " No, no," from the Opposition benches.) lie (Mr. Stanley) believed that the Noble and Learned Lord had succeeded in satisfying ninety-nine persons out of a hundred that the charge was unfounded. The Lord Chancellor, therefore, had proceeded upon very different grounds, when he introduced the subject, from those now proceed,cl upon by the Hon. and Learned Gentleman. The Lord Ch ancel l or ' s observat i ons were i n re f erence to a direct charge against him ; but the Hon. and Learned Gentleman had not mentioned that any charge had been made against him, and had not even specified the language that had been applied to him.—(Hear.) Sir R. PEEL.—Sir, I have read the expressions re ferred to by my Hun. and Learned Friend with sentiments of the greatest pain. 11 , 1 r. STANL E Y — A re t h ey correct? Sir E. PEEL-1 have beard no imputation upon them. (Several Hon. Members, " Order, order.) Sir R. PEEL—I ma y b e p u t down by referenc e to technicalitie s , but I feel that this is a suhj ct of deep im portance, not only to my L earne d F r i en d, who, I think, has shown a proper sense of what is due to himself in the notice he h as ta k en o f t h ese expres sions, bu t to the p r i vileges of t hi s House.—( C heers .) When this subject was mentioned the other day, I s tated that having heard the Noble Lord's evidence given in Committee with respect to it, WAR "i/ACCI that the apptgaiintilt which he had 1174titi was only provisional, and that he meant to abolish the office in question ; but still I heard nothing in the speech of the Honourable and Learned Gentleman rshith was at all inconsistent with the performance of his public duties as a Member of this Hou.e.—(Cle era.) Two offices, notorious sinecures, fell vacant, and they were filled up. Whit was more natural than that soy Ifanourahle Member of this House should make an inquiry upon the subject ?—(Cheers.) In former times an hour would not have passed without a question being put to the Government on such a subject. I spoke twice in the course of the evenini, and stated my opinion to be, that further discussion was then premature, but that I had no doubt the appointments were provisional. Answers having been given to the question of my Ho nourable and Learned Friend, a Noble Lord in another place, at the head of the profession to which my Honourable and Learned Friend helongs,—(Cheers)— the Chief Judge of the kingdom, the Peer who presides in the other branch of the legislature, describes a Member of this House of Parliament in terms which would effectually deter many individuals shrinking from abuse-- shrinking from the castigation of the Noble Lord— shrinking from the sarcasm his command of language gave him power to inflict—shrinking from the ruin which such an attack might bring upon a professional man—would, I say, deter many from performing their duty in this House.—(Cheers.) Sir, my respect for that Noble Lord, my admiration of his talents, will prevent me quoting the opprobrious expressions which he is said to have used, but when he describes a Member of this House as a crawling reptile, as an insect, in the most offensive terms, the House may judge what his language must have been. I agree in the in convenience of referring to the proceedings of the other House ; but if a gentleman is to be attacked in such terms in the other House, he must either submit to the opprobrium cast upon him, or endeavour to cast it off —(Hear, hear, hear.) I deeply regret, from the feelings I have always entertained towards that Noble Lord, that he should so far have forgotten himself as to attack a Member of this House in terms so offensive, and I will say so undeservedly offensive, as those the Noble Lord is said to have used with respect to my Honourable and Learned Friend.-- The Right Hon. G-ntleman seems to cast a doubt upon the correctness of this report, but the one I refer to is in the Times, and certainly if we may judge of the correctness of a report by its elaborateness, this bears upon it the marks of being correct ; but I shall be clad to hear that it is not so. Lord ALTHORP be2ged to say that his Noble Friend had told him this morning the report in the Times and another paper was most incorrect. In what respect it was incorrect his Noble Friend did not say, and as he (Lord Althorp) di .t not hear his Noble Friend, he could not say whether the complaint of incor rectness applied to the sentiments or expressions. —(Hear, bear, hear.) He deprecated, however, bandying backwards and for wards from one House to the other strong expressions, most unbecoming the dignity of either House, and the convenience of their proceedings.—(Hear, hear ) He would only add, that no objection having been taken to those ex. pressiuns in the other House of Parliament at the time, was a fact which might lead to the presumption that the report was exageerated.—(Hear, bear.) Mr. GOULBURN said he was quite willing to be lieve, and hoped, that such was the case—that the report in the public papers was incorrect; but the brat proof of that would be, for the Noble Lord to take the earliest opportunity of contradicting it in his pltice, since he had not, whicl4e should have thought the first neces sary step, assusgthe victim that he had not used the calumnious expressions attributed to him. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that he was not in the House when this matter was first brought before it for the third time.—(Hear, hear.) He was quite aware the Right Honourable Gentleman had stated that he felt convinced it was but a provisional appoint ment, but he would put it to the candour of the House, and the Right Hon. Gentleman, whether it was a fair interpretation of what the Lord Chancellor actually in tended to do. Facts clearly showed the contrary. The question had been put without notice to any one, and in a manner calculated to convey unfavourable impressions with respect to the Chancellor. He thought, therefore, his Noble Friend had a right to complain of the course adopted, and he was not at all surprised that he should feel considerable resentment at what had been stated in the absence of any person who could have given explanation on the subject.—(Hear.) As to expressions made use of in newspapers, as those of Members of either , House, no one was called on to vindicate or deny them. With respect to the expressions inverted in the newspaper in question, it was quite impossible they could have been used. The expressions used by the Hon. Member for St. Mawes were totally uncalled for, espe cially at a time when the Lord Chancellor had been most actively conferring benefits on the public, by the abolition of sinecures ; and the fact of toe lucrative office coming into his gift had not at all altered his determination in that re spect. The Hon. Member for Ripon had seen the Lord Chancellor immediately after the falling-in of this office, to whom the Lord Cuanceflor had expressed his determi nation not to make any alterations in the Bills, the first line of which went to the abolition of that office. Was it not hard theta*, ire that the Lord Chancellor should have been represented as having put his brother into office for the sake of getting compensation ?—(Hear, hear ) He trusted that the subject would not be proceeded with further, as in his opinion the House would be uselessly employed in doing so. PEEL could not conceive by what right the Hon. and Learned Member could put a construction upr•n a question which he was not present to bear. At the time the question WAS put he (Sir R. Peel) had stated it as his conviction that the appointment was only provi• sional, He had said further that the Lord Chancellor ought not to lose from the abolition of his office, but that he ought to have ample compensation. The ATTORNEY GENERAL had formed his judg ment from what be had seen in the papers, and he cer tainly thought an imputation was conveyed that a vested interest was created fur the purpose of obtaining compen sation for its abolition. Sir R. INGLIS considered that if such attacks were to be permitted as had been made upon the Hon. and Learned Member for St. Mawes, there was an end of the independence of that House. It was true that the Hon. Member for St. Mawes's professional eminence could not be injured by such observations, but he considered the expressions used were such as no gentleman was entitled to apply to any Member of that House, and that it was necessary, therefore, that the character of the House, and the privilege of its Members, together with its independ ence, should be vindicated. The Noble and Learned Lord hid stated, through Lord Althorp and the S.'cretary for Ireland, that there was great incorrectness in the report It such was the case, in his (Sir R. Inglis's) opinion, the course for the Noble Lord to pursue was, to bring the per son who had put such words into his mouth, to the Bar. If the Noble Lord did not pursue such a course, or did no , in his place correct the statement, the Honourable and Learned Member for Sr. Mawes was fully entitled, in vindication of himself and of the independence of a.- House, to complain of such a violation of its privileges. Mr. MACAULA Y said that the complaint here rested upon words, and it was well known that reports in newspapers did not generally contain the actual words u hich were made use of by Honourable Members. With respect to the question put by the Member fur St. . _ Mawes, Lord Eldon had expressed himself hurt at the observation ; and that Noble Lord was in some measure to be considered as the leader of the party to which the Honourable Member belonged. He (Mr. ;Vannley) considered it a most unjust attack on the Lord Chancellor, made in a must uncourteous manner.__ (Hear, hear.) An imputation had been thrown upon him by it, which, if true, would e.mount to a dishonest act; and it must be remembered that that imputation was made at a time when the Lord Chancellor was in the act of making great sacrifices to the public.—(Hear hear.) It Was not therefore at all surprising that the Lord Chancellor should express himself rather angrily upon the subject. In his (Mr. M s.) opinion, if any person wits to blame, it was the Hon. and Learned Member for St. ?Hawes, who had most certainly made the first attack. —( Hear, hear, hear.) Sir C. WETHERELL observed, that nothing had been done by the Hon. Member for St. Mawes. that could be considered at all in the light of a provocation, for it had been the constant usage of Diem: err of Par liament to ask questions relative to the filling up of tier tan offices. It could oat, thereforiii, in his opinion, be sail by the Lord Chancellor, or any other man, :that the put sg Audi qutitioa called 1r opy Mr. W. BROUGHAM it lid that perhaps the Hone and Learned Gentleman would allow him to state what O l e Lord Chancellor did say.—(Hear, hear.) He expressly said that it was necessary to fill up certain offi, es, in order that the duties might not be left undischargi d, and he had placed his brother in them, having in him the full est reliance that he would throw no obstacle in the way of their abolition, and that from that individual net one word would be heard upon the subject of vested (Cheers.) Sir C. WETHERELL said he was present when the Noble and Learned Lord had spnkeu on this part of the subject, though he was not present when he opened his vocabulary against his Hon. and Learned Friend, and he had heard nothing Oil the 'subject of vented right., and it appeared the most accurate of the• ieperters .lnu had not heard a word on the subject. He a - ao willing tar de iustice to the Noble and Learned Lord ; but what he bad heard that Noble Lord say was, that his brother being tin der his control. be could direct him to do what he thought fit. Ile had, however, iu another psrt of his speech, said that be hail a risht to fill those offiees op. Then in that case he should have withdrawn his other statement.— (Cries of " No, no.") They were uteely inc. ns stew.— (No, no He would say, "Yes." The Noble Lord was here claiiiiiar the offices, with, all their rights and emits irtents....4 proposition which he (Sir C. Wetherell) would not for a moment dispute, for there could lie no question but that he had the right, dejure and de facto to fill up those offices; but then, if the Noble and Learned Lord persevered in this, he battered down his `'roue ereument. The Hon. Member !night shake his Lead, but be should not shake him (Sir C. Wetherell) from his argument.- -(Hear, hear, and a laugh.) The Nohle and Learned Lord did not say that his brother was bound to give up the offices without compensation.—(Hear, hear.) He did n ot say so. He had only said he had appointed his bro ther because he had sufficient control over him to induce hm to act as he thought fit. If the House of Lords permitted the language complained of to be used, the con sequence would he the destruction of the privileges of the House of Commons—for such language was not only cal culated to demolish any one less distinguished in his pro. ussi , m than his Hon. Friend, but was also calculated to lemolish him as a Member of that House —(Hear, bear.) In this way, if such language were permitted, the inde pendence of the House might be destroyed. Mr. ROBINSON said that, on the former occasion when this matter was before the House, he had made no remark on the discussion, until it had proceeded to such leneth that the colleagues of the Noble and Learned Lord had declined to give an answer to the question, alleging, 'hey were ignorant of the appointments actuallj being ide. He appealed to the House, whether he was not teen justified in putting his veto against any claim of vested rights?—(Hear, hear.) When a question of this impor tance was brought forward, after notice having been given, is was stated, and relative to a csse so very peculiar, ely no Hon. Member would say, the Hon. and Learned aismtier had no right to put the question.—(Hear, hear.) Whatever inconvenience might arise from such discussions —and he felt their inconvenience as much as any one—he 'oust say, the whole had arisen out of thelineof conduct par lied by the Noble and Learned Lord in another place,where, lot content with vindicating Lis own conduct, he threw ;int imputations in a manner so peculiarly offensive, that sinless the House was willing to surrender its privileges at once to the Lord Chancellor, whose character and talents tet held in the greatest estimation, it was high time the question should be taken up. and he was therefore glad of 'h e notice which had been taken of it that night.—(Heir, f• opt the Opposition belches.) In order to prevent a re petition M such proceedings in another place, he was glad iif what had already taken place, lest it might be necessary to call for a more serious notice than had yet been given to the subject —(Hear, hear.) Mr. RIDLEY COLBORNE was present when the Noble and Learned Lord spoke on the previous evening, etd he had beard him say what had been attributed to him by his Hon. Friend the Member for Southwark (Mr. Wm. itrougham). There was another remark male by the Noble and Learned Lord also, which, as it was not eaticed in any of the Papers, he would repeat. He lid it was next to impossible that his brother should nett suffer by the appointment, it was so soon to be abo lished, and the fees on accepting it were so great. Lord JOHN RUSSELL should not have taken part the present discussion if the Hen. and Learned Gsn ,leman (Sir C. Wetherell) had not attacked the substance of the defence made by the Lord Chancellor. The herd Chancellor had declared, that this office ought to be abolished, and had a Bill prepared for that purpose, and though he had given that office to his brother, the Bill ein iined unaltered ; and there was a distinct un derstanding that his brother should claim no com pensation, when it should he abolished, on the score of ousted rights. If this wits not a complete defence to the charge against the Lord Chancellor, be (Lord John Rus sell) knew not what sort of statement could amount to a defence. There could be no doubt whatever hut the Lord Chancellor claimed his right to fill tho‘e offices when tie appointment to them became a matter of public necessity, but that was not at ull incensistent with his ssying that they should be abolished without compensation to the persons he appointed to them. With respect lo the inguage which had been complained of, be would just ob serve that the Hon. Member for Worcester, and the Hen. Ind Learned Member for Boroughbridge, had acted un fairly in stating that Ministers complained of the Hon. and Learned Member for St. Melees for having asked the questiiin as to the filling up of the office. They did not somplain of any such thing.—(Hear, hear.) The Hon. and Learned Member had a right to ask the question, and r.iic Hon. Member for Worcester had also a right to speak a• he had done, although he, perhaps, exceeded a little in üblic jealousy.—(Hear, hear.) It was a practice in re b q i ti dh e he ntly ( i L ti o d rd ulgje'd Russell) 1e in a n t d h eh his Hon. ni;bulrinds but they, saving served a long apprenticeship to it, knew how to put their questions in a more simple form than those Hon. Members had done.—(Hear, anal much laughter.) Th e d his Noble Friend near him felt a good deal of diffi sulty in endeavouring to pick the question out from the mass of phi ippic with which it was surrounded. He tb ught that the whole of this disagreeable subject might nave been avoided it the Hon. Member for St. Mawes had to.,eu content to put hie question in a different manner. Sir H. HARDINGhi said it would seem that the No ble Loid, from the lecture he had read to tee House, would wish to prevent any Hon. Gentleman from putting q i?stions.—(Hesr, bear, from the Opposneun Benchet.) his Hon. and Learned Friend could have taken no other eiiiirse than that which lie had adopted, after a Noble and Learned Lord, in another piece, hail indulged in language the most indecorous and op proerious against hi in. -- Cheers.) The Learned Gcntlem in, the Attorney-Gene ;sl, had complained of his Hon. and Learned Friend that eve had given no notice of the question he intended to put; ,tit he would Ask whether it was new to the litmus • that questions should be put in that way ? He contended hat seder tee Adminiseatioti tvitb welch he himself 'Lad tiesn seenected, questions were u sice,i witunu .14,fte- lug ;von. There appeared to have tic; a greet tied ni al , tel d licacv in c ertain (patters respecting a ,laries. The •I. std Privy Seal had said that he would take no salary, if did is the Noble Nstamtattr.General. That \'