The Sun. — London, England, 1801-01-13 00:00:00

LAW REPORT. COURT OF KING's BENCH. TuEsnAvi 'NOV. 2S. THE KING RUSBY. Tiits was a Case which came on to be heard on a motion for a new Trial. It was an India-, •. merit against the Defendant for Reg rating Corn,,. and tried before Lard KENYON and, a ,Special Jury in Guildhall, London, on the 4th of July last, when'the Defendant was found guilty. , Lord KENYON reported the case as it appeared . before his Lordship, at Nisi Prius, and which ap 'peared in our Paper of the ph of July. Mr. EitSKlNE.shewed cause against the Rule, which he said was for a new, trial, anit if that 'should be unsuccessful, hiS learned friend, Mr. LAW, who moved it, had reserved hiinself for the alternativeof moving in arrest' cif judgment.--- He should therefore confine himself now, to the motion in its present shape, because, if there was •any error on the Record.the Defendant would . be, entitled to avail himself of it at any time before' Judgment was . pronounced.—He should say no thing of the quality of the offence, nor of its tendency irLsociety; in its . preSeat stare, forthese would be considerations for the Court when the season for pronouncing its. judgment should arrive. The question now: was, whether this was a Ver dia contrary to the Evidence ?, For it - was upon .that point alone, their,Lordships would pronounce today. It appeared by the Report of the Trial, that under the idea, of the: liberty of trade, the greatest •of all possible :oppressions 'had 'been suffered by the consumers of this article of the very first necessity for the support of human life, the effeas of which no man could contemplate without fear and trembling---It appeared,' among', . • other things, that Corn was not sold at the Coro; Market in' bidk, but by sample, while the ,bulk remained in Ships in the River. These samples were-pat in small bags upon stands 'at the Market, specifying the quantity in bulk, by a fiiark upon the bag: That there • are Jobbers who ,deal in thii corn; and who go round, and by •. their artifice, a.fr,,,a the price Of 'the Market most alarmingly ; for it appeared by the: evi dence of Smith, althinigh he was the Partner of Rushy,' this' Very . Defendant, that the price Visulreetedini One day faits 4o to 45 shillings' per cittarter, by this very JObblng.—These JO_ beri procured, by artifice, a pre-etnption to them. "selves,, because thL'y said, « if it conies to sucli'a Trice,. let me bare it ;" so that . when the Con sumer came, he could never !Live it helOw . t it price,. nor tor that - price, for the jobber came , round again, and if that 'eii-er. oriee WaS uttered, .are would give more, and so's6enre, hirwself, 'events the, pre-emptino, so thlt thaarr. I)C4ler could never have' any Corn q't, all, of any Wily; ► but the Jobber.; aria the Jobber, havh)g got. it into his oWn hands, and king- Oat of a f6v, yho always agreed in order to pat stoney in tlitir :poekets,• he would haye' price, `,lle-,plPased, for the article must be had; apd, not be. 'waited tor. This war the subSianeeof the , prefit.v . With Which' the 'lndiaineni' ehar i t the Defending, and of :this he Was prOVed tb' :be guilty, the jtiry' believed, the EviaCtici'and they therefore conviaed- him. Botbthe Defendant and his Partrier, Smith, - Who thought fit to come 'his Witness at the trial,. were in the daily prigliceol this traffic. The'Conti would see . by the evidence of Mr. Richard Snell, 'that Rusby himself bought the Corn, as had been stated, and Carried it from the 'Stand of ShriMptiao . aod, to his Own, that is,, to tht: stand "of Will and Rushy, where it was - told the same day at an ad. vanced Price—that is, 'in a few minutes rafter'_ • wards' the same sample of Corn was seen oil the stand' of ,Nattrass anti Company. . It was trite, that Smith, RuSby's Piirtner, - swore, that Rub bad nothing ,whatever to do With the' te-side 'of this Corn, ,for that he, Smith, re-sold it against , the will of Rushy ; lint Mc. liaSx I N> contencred, that it wa.s clear? from the' Whole cif the trial, that Rusby was naive iiithe 'whole business- 7 that indeed, the ails he had * t i stating, Were the aaS of Ru'sby find not Smith,, : The first ads, those.of,the buying; were cleOly Rushy's, and 'that inded was not disputed, and; therefore rio thing remained bat the ,Reerariug, which was the selling again on the same d'ay: To - prove this part Of the case, Mr': ERIK't E said, he .was obliged to call Mr. Nattrass as 'a , Witness, -which was seeking for assistance from' the Enemy's quarterS, and their Loolships could only have, upon the,Report,..the Answeraus they :appeared drily; they could not hasc'anyidea of preva rication which preeoeil . theme.,` nor of the.rnaoner in whitl they, were screwed oat, of the Witoe*s ; came, he said, ifropsof blood from the Witness, arm lit . , t o d c d :l 6, that a :more disgract 7 fw prn,ee r cling Aiever AMA said 'tat this wail, the .feeling _of the whdle Court, which was thronged at this trial: The attempt was to shewi. that thi3 sets not a sale by Rushy to tile. Witness, but by Smith ; and, in4ead of hit real book, Where the transai. lion was entered, and which". h, bad, notice to produce, and w h ich the Defetidatit's Attorney honourably advised hint to produce, Mr. Nittreass thought fit to prOduce a copy of theboolz, which he si as silly enough to say he thought would as well as the boo le itself, and that enpY'avas ne;t a copy of the origin ii entry, bat of a fitbrieated entry; made by the desire of Rusty he had no doubt, and the alteration of the entry took place after the .oilence was cornriiiited, and Icnavvb to be an offence—for these weakape ple, the'Cdrn Jobbers ,and Regraters, thought that they were doing only that which they were .y.'arranted by Law in dying. It ippeareil also, that. Nattrass- 1 'bid conversations over and over'again'with Rus by previous , to the trial, and had seetaini on the morning of thei;lial, What was the el'itry' as it 4peared 'by the copy proposed to bk given in' evidence by Nattra: , watt ar retry of a sale by ,Tli,,m3s Smith. The hook it. I.( At r:,A. StT=o*Ficr, N self, containing the entry made 'at ihe time the, event happened, was sent for in the middle of the . trial, and so` far was the entry froin being what the Witness stated 'it to be, that the'book had, , . been.altered for the ~ very purpose, and it ap peared that neither Smith nor Rusby sold any. Corn in this particular way before nor sineei. ,and, Mr. ERLiKINE contended, that the conduit of Mr. Nattrass was extraordinary and highly 're., prehensible•on this occasion ; and he maintained, that neither the Jury, ner arty man in Court, be- 1 lieved one 'syllable that was sworn by him tend ing- to screen.the Defendant; :and as to the evi deuce of Mr. Smith, his Lordship had reported that 'he thought the Jury - were warranted in not be lieVing Mr. Smith. Thus stood the outline of the. Case upon theevidence, and upon which the Jury, had found the Defendant guilty. . As to the liability, of Partnership, supposin g e the, rsale. of the Corn to be the ad of Smith Mr. ,EISKINF, said, he: apprehended that these, persons, who were in partnershiptogether, were, bound by the ads.of ontanother -; and, he appre .hended, that .in all Misdemeanours. it was when the object of th.e-ad is the common profit, of the trade of the .Partnership: He knew that if two or three Booksellers were in partnership, and one of them happened- to sell a book which . contained a•Lihel i . they would 41 three be sub. jest to indiameni, although it be ever so clearly proved the other,two knew nothing of, the sale of .the book,—This:had been expressly .decided ,by the Court, and that against ,and over-rulingall thearguments which he had. been able to offer on the subjed, and he believed that he had been as persevering as any body on that topic ;- there was therefore no colour for,.the .objection that the Defendant here was not liable , because . the was the aft of his Partner and his own. : But it was contended by the Defendant's Coun. sel, when the Motion was Made fore the new Trial, that the. Verdid Wl:* contrary to .Evi dence, inasmuch •as the Re.salewas by Smith,,and not by Rusby, and Mr. Lsw.then contended that there was no Law against buying Corn by Sample, the bulk of Which, in this case, was in a Vessel in the River; that the buying was.lawful;,and that there were no: proofs of any unlawful Sale; that the averment: that the. Defendant bought the Corn unlawfully, was not proyed, arc. TR,,,MINE .said,-there did not appear,to him to be any, thing in this. argument::, and, as to same parts of the Record in this Case, which was stated to con. tain AvermentsHwhich •were not, proved, Mr. • 1 ,- '4 SKI NE. quo tektite, Case of the KING and Hennas, ,t() shew that whatever' part of. the. Record stated that: which was certain, must be proved, but that therest'may be rejeded .asisurplusage;, so might ; the word " unlawful," be here reteded,as stir pluS4e, as it 'applied.:merely to. the buying, and. thit the word; unlawfully might. be made to ,ply co the :Whole of the conduct, of .the Delen. _dant, as Stated on he Record, and covered by: the : general Verdid of Guilty. However, this ebjettion, if there:was any ,weight in it, - would. be available to IMendant in a Minion in ,4r,rest.ofjthigment,l because it was an objection. can tht:Lsre....c.if;the,:itecord, .the fans might v a. .oy . to it. upon his Lordship's. Notes.' The only. question. here:was, - whether the IndiaMent was supported' by .the Evidence For ,if it 'was, the . Verdictwns..right; .10hethee.any, Judgment could inliovror nOr, and-that was enough to dispose of the:present Motion. Mr, GARROW contended' also, that the word " unki,viully," as applied to - the original Pus, chase' of the Cbrn by Ausby, was to be regarded, as surplusage, and need not be proved, any more' than the words " craftily and subtilly, intending to deceive and defraud," need be proved against De t . " aant in ' 1 6 Onialon. Mion or Aisumpsit : Or, " ror having the fear of Gosl befpre but being timed and seduced by the instigation of thd Devil to starve the Poor,". need, be proved in this Case, any more than it would be neces. nary to prove it in If ease of Murder. With regard to the ll:fendant's not being an swerable for the saie of this Corn, because it was the ad of Smith, he ivory contend, that even supposing, for the sake of the Argument, the la to be so, yet Rushy was, in' t h ts case , li d able and hopeful wciuld be the state and condition of the Msrket, &Rushy was not liable, for Rushy might come at eight o'clock in the morning and It)' until ten; and Smith might come at ten, 4nd stay until twelve, and sell so that the,misclit'il would be compleat, and neither could he punished, because the practice was split and divided be tweet( them ; but this was not the way in which the Justice of this Country was to be admini ,tered. Mr. KNAPP followed on the same side. Mr. LAW said, he'rose to address their Imrd. ships, under a very considerable degree of atocie. ty, because it wotild be most painfUl to him, if -„„ ut muc h from vulgar violence,' and brutal rage; should suffer any further injury from the impeilenions of his Ad.vocafe in the conduft of hi, Cause on, the present Occasion: Indeed, that he was in a con dition to. speak at all upon the Subjea, was mat ter almost of accident, for that the Defendant was now existing, was matter mere of good for. tune than, at one time, he hailed for, or, was agieeable to the willies Of those Who 'expressed their rage against him, and who had, indeed, en deavoured. to destroy him. • Fit.should now pro.. ceed to the question ota- new Trial; and reserve to himself the right which, .indeed, the De fendantmust always have, t o 'move in Arrest of judgment. He should , tak e the liberty of Con. :ending, that the word unlawfnlly,” which oc_ carted in this Record, and which applkd to the Purcliase% of the Cpyn queitioni was by, no trreans , so trifling, and frivolous, or fdolish, in a Ca:e which is to fastett , it crime upon a Man, as in this Case it wag at4empted, or, is his Learned .Friends would have it'under4tood. This was nut a case of Forestalling, nor was there any ob jalion to the Defendant's first Purchase of tht. , Corn, and there 'was no eViden , :e of his Navin been guilty of Regrating, whieh ; Consisted in dig second Sale. He observed, tharit was not ne..: cessary for him to give the.Court . much trouble ; for the case appeared, - to him, to - be a ()lain oee.—lt did not !cone under the same_ range, nor into the same class as the Case of the Knso and Hoarse, for here the word'" lawtully," could not b e surplusage, inasmuch as the Indidment stated that' the !Defendant did corm* and unlawftilly .buy, and 'then -re- sell, &c. so •that there would femain no Offence if 'the word " unlawfully" was rejected as s ur . .phisage.—So muchsfdr the word unlawfully.---; He should now hurnblk address their Lordships'. on the subject of the evidence given at the trial; and he took the liberty of saying, that the-Pre ponderance of the evidence was, in point 'of fad; in favour of 'the Defendant, there beirig ness to contradid Smith, who swore most posi 'tively that the resale: was not only against thP I consent, but against the remonstrance ofth„De..! fenclitet ; that if, - this be true, and there vias : nd evidence to contrddht it, the Defendant,. Rusby, could, not upon any principle 'of Justice), nor of Law, which' he was acquainted with, be involved in any crime by what was done. Bei admitted that one Partner was bdtind anciani, werable for !the aa of another, as it b mioht ailed • his civil property;, ,and that he wou ld Eye so 'if there was any collusion :between the Parties 7— . lie woujd 'admit al s o, th a t the one P a rtne r wou ld . be an swerable for the 41'of another in a criminal Sense, where shey both c :t rr i e d o n a general , illicit' trade.—Theie were 'propositions which he would not dispute ; but where one Partner was so far, from authoriSing, 'that he refus,-.1, so far from: assenting that he resisted, so far from consentisli that he remonstrated, upon the Ad, s he ap • rehended there was n o L aw w hi c h pronounce d him criminal, ; and that was precisely the cast of • the !Defendant, Mr. Rushy. Mr. Justice La Btaise said, he did not onder_ stand that to be contended for on, the other side,' but that the Prosecutors insisted that the Defend.. ant's resistance was'a mere pretence. La.sv then .ob`sert , ed, that possibly the • jury might have 'iniScOneeived the Noble and Learned Judge at ' t h e tr ial, upon the subjeft of the criminal liability of one Partner for / the ad of another.—That one Partner 'Xs 'sis• liable in eases where hi's interest is concerned, 'was true,- but then, if no,distintlion b l e drawn, such a aoo. trine might haVeled to a coneftl4lM that* the Defendant was iniplicSted in the criminal con. sequence, althOugh he protested against the cri. minal'ad, which:would be . unjust ; and as this !Might have happened., in the present Case, seemed but 'fair that the D4endatit . shanld!haVe a new As to what Mr. GARitol,r's'iticl, that one Partner might buy in the morning,-and ' the other might sell, it was observables-hat if such a thing shauld happen, and• the one who! bought protested against the sale, and tl7; 'sale' afterwards took place at the risk and on the . account 'Of himielf, th e , seller, •there was no: Partnership i n t h at a d and therefore whatever ' criminality there was in,the thing, irepuld attach• only to the person selling, for here•would be . no . : Partnership, there being in that at, no commus • pity of interest.—Now, that this was, or was not so.--whieh way did - the evidence, not lightly, but infinitely; preponderate'? 'Be would say ..its infinitely preponderated'on the-side of 'the De fendant. • His' Learned' Friends, of Counsel for the ProsectitiOn, Would istiplieate Mr. Rusby in the situatihn •of the book of Mr. NattrasS ;- s .. that was not "a' bciok over *which the' Defendant had .ever had any . power ; the Defendant had . never 'given Mr, Nattrass notice to. produce his :! book ; 'this was the ,incliVidual id of Mr. Nit!. truss, and whatever weakness or folly. might have been exhibited concerning that book, it re.. ferred solely mi. an alt which was done bet Ween Smith and .Naterass, - and : . therefore shOuld' not operate to the prejudice of the Defendant - ; whateiser alterations might:,have been made in that lidok; the Defendant, was_ not . privy to any of them, nor .w:ts ther c e Least ,evidence hatever to conns4 tag Defendant with . that , b00k..--"Under these cireurnstances, • the ii eight Of di:it twitter ought to be taken out of the scale on the side orthe . Prosecution,.although it . might have had some e ffect Upon the minds, of the- jury at the trial, and if it had, that ,was an additional reason for granting the. Ders•ndant a new Trial. In a word, tmless the Court were prepared to say they,believed that'the clear, positive and tradided e • Videnee of Mr. §inith, who was warn. ed before-hand, !that every word of hieevidence would be taken down, by a Shorthand Writer, was a tale .of perjury from the beginning . to the end, the. Defendant. ought to have a new Trial, for Mr. Smith although . he was; told. that what he should say : would be taken down.for the pur. • .poses of carrying on a Prosecntion against hint) swore Most positively that Mr. Rushy had: nothing whatever to do kith the re-sale of . the Corn io,question.—lnsbis s both 'Milian! S m i t h ttnd r ehOplaS' Smith stood wholly Uncontmdieted, a 11d if 'that svere 'so, it Was •abs - Olutely irnpos sihle for , Mr. }Lusby to have been guilty upon this Iniiidnient. opinions, of the judges on this important Case in.our next, if possible. MARRIED Mr. Tylor, of fiattun Garden, to Mrs. Hepworth, Gesell . ..street. 7 , On the 9th of August last, at Fort St. George, in the Fit,st Indies, Mr. loan Locke, of the Hop. East-India Cionpany's Ship Marquis,' Wellesley, to Miss Cullen, d ighter of Colonel Cullen, of His Alajesty's Scots Bri gade, and grand-daughter of Sir Archibald Hope, of kin kie, Bart. PRICE C HAGS. Xent;lsl. r6l! "Ds. Sussex, 1510.5. to 101. cot.' Essex, Ist. ps. , t o 141. os. DIFW. On Sutulay morning, at house at •Walthamtfow, in Essex, John Rim,. Esq. ged gz: years. • On S'aturday, last, at 'Stepney-Green, Mr. Sam ue l lurch,• , - Oh Wednesday,: at her . house. at' Clapton, Mrs. Web- r, . widow of George Webster,. Esq. - late of Bucklers tie ry. • On the 7th' hist; , nt Horseley-Housei , near Dudley, jo., scpli Amphlett, Ef4q. in the 44th year of his age, aft Aaing - Nlogistrate for the Countie3 ox Worcester and Stafford, and a 'Depiity Lieutenant foithe latter. , • _ . .. . . . . , 1 -ily . 1;14 Cli AWA II Mb MI I, LAN , rot' fil - N_sir,..%:!, c'• velit- C. arden); and Published by loHi4litsw rex, for . Cr:itch-I:inklings,. I)rury- Lane); 0. 1 12., Pray, 1 wheat. Aivirrhi,,,,,,, , ,vit, 1),...1_ , k; for thr 'P,A•r_ Littiori fnr th Ir'i;t.,;... ii, /a.... .-'.J 1 uaks-..an L.. —1 .31111 0 ' ~a ~.4:* 7 j, .. L. ,CRAVCSEND, JAN. Ir Past by-41* 11.esolution, frorn South Seis ; skapper, froth Malztgal FriendSliip` --► fan Barcelona ; and Hasbett, Dahl, from Seville. • Sailed—the United States, calais. PRICE TEST Bank Stock . Navy , S petLetrt..96l IrisrCent_ 4 96-1 h 5 per Cent 797 . 94 7 4 Ver Cent. Con. goi .3 iterCent. keit. 62ft 3 per Cent. Con. 6t iii Ditto Strip • Anti. iS Ditto Shint Ann. si Ditto Scrip STOC r itS, AlitY. 111t1;:t Stock • Ditto 13otids &CAL Exchcquer Inns Lottery Tiekqs (ditto Onmill". , l prem. Impel. I pcv 12eot. 6,0 pi t o Mm. 1 14:fin' Ac aunt 11,:qa ter (titre- :Gs eons. for Op 63ti LONDON MARKETS, &e.- CORN EXCHANGE, MONDAY, lAN. The supplyof Gratin from Essex was t - athershort : : l - 11, Kent, nearly the same as using; we 11411 many bt9, 14 4 ,1 from different parts or the coMi iry which lifts 044i5i01w,„, , . a rise on fine.sample4 'is per Q uarter.:°- Vw', ivarbe Sareples'haye not advanced, on the contrary' dull sale. • be l 4 l very fine Sariiples of Barkir have ati vane `,"f chiefly bought for the purpos- of mealin:. Pease and Oats have both advanced. Horse and Tick Beans remain intich us last, week. • RETURN' PR 1-E 'of GitA %Vheu, 9os.- to His: • I Fine ditto t 1135. ,- to 95 3 . Superfine-i4Bs. to fsos. - , Rye, Sgs. to`roo's - ., Old, to si; • Coarse Barley, 545. to 625. Fine ditto, 645. to S6s. Superfine, ut .S. • Malt, 603. to 765. .1 Fine ditto, '7Ss. to So.. Superfine, to s. I IN, 4211110 ' dr,t 1 3 6 tlZr 14 " g PCM. 70S. 10 ADS. ti6llcf 5, 52,.. co 965. «905..t0 105 S. .‘ t 9 Horst: 70S. tO e" OH, to • r's. Tifiks, 70s. to 745. Old, to s. , 4 0.. to 47.$s_ fine chtty,,sos. teksis. Polmads, 535. to 565. RETUItY•OT WHEI' By Messri. Camp antl4l Including only frouttite.29l agreeable to Quarters ar 1625. 4g2 i6os. ' 7 0 — 7 -- " 7--. "%-a 1 101 361 lit 2:65. Is 9 ISp. 4 1 — "7" 'at 1 545: • at is3s. 7 66 17 at tsts. 1114 . at ISCS. IS at tos. , at igzs. ,93 240 at 64, 5' 3 2 t. 1 45- . 71 - 81 31 " . . . . • Total sjllsrters ts. t! C 0 F. sect, to s. Sccom4,9os:.to , I IsN. N I idd6): ias. i9 . os, per:qt. Vtuni, - lle.:. 4i, IQ Jam t, 16 t;#tk s —3 .—.--- w 3.14. 6806 --- at 5 . 395. at 4105. 6cl: 1 67 34. 149*. 4; --- at' rm. - Li at .12 . .5.• ;KC 61 ) at ta6s. oft: • IN M.1"12K-I._.ANE, At PAS, Neal Weighers. aof Dec. to 3il of lie new Ad. zzo Quarters at tots. I.o>. itt 514 •ta))). 239- ttt S at t 335. 3 0 -....-... a t t 31,;. 235 --•••••••:-:-•••-..' at - i sos.. .41 I.2SS. 3 /Irk at i 2 15. At 130 . 5 ", at tits, It 4 'xt rico,* 1 tB6 t it gas, —Average tvs. iast Itctutp.7'. FLOUR. - Fine .Poll. 3§s to aloe. - , .Coptenno, :44 . Itort, Pat. 2 t '<,"l. 6 0 . Bran,' 2 TORii:ES OF 1 . ,1.()( 7 :Z. YroirVth... , 1761:1:,:t-TIftic.c , ,, 1(0 Sitcks :it . 'll.l. oCt. .• - 90 -----. at'l2.o. 0d• I -- at 1.2.7,, 4, 5 ----- At 11.1., 0 ,1 . 1 ;3 •- - -7 -- Itt" , za.o. 0 1' ... 1 45, -- 777 -- --At ,{10S• 0 . : • 4 20 ...--,--.;-; in 1.05. 044: $,276 Sac S. —Avesagz 1293. 4 41 - c . lower thio last Reit:an. , 4 A VCriKA y rice of Ekisl.alut And. W4les, itcrrigl Ike 15 ;4 . , lyc, 41 25. 2ti, 8.0;•-; 43%.• rd.' Bemis, Bs.' 7d. P 84 ' att.% ' • . ENTRY of INIPORTg CRAIN-in the PORT 'al last' Week. Netts; ; 4 0qTaarter! . I 41 PS , • Clover Seed ato Lva. • • . LUND C) 4 1; - : -Wheitt; v 5 6 ,0 quarters. Barley, 29.7 a Oats'. - F HOPS. ►OCk,FTS. Kent, i6l. Oi: to ! SI 0c Sussei: s .l6l:' , 4. to 'l7l. o':" raCkthilM, 14i.05,A19t.t0% ••: ' • ,•••• Red Clever SEEDS., per osof.)• • • Whitc H .eloNer, ( O' - Trefoii, ditto , 'Conti?, i per bttctl''. - - Rye Grass, (per gni tety„ - Calve Foil, ditto' . - %Vane Mtt4tard Seed, (per b‘ulicl i - Brown ditto, dittO Canary Seed ditto - R.mie Seed; {per hit). - - - /os . . • : t : A l l 11 :44.1.45!:"1":::: tO os t3s, to 2 0 , 1.. to )6s. to 1 r1: 45 j, to 3- SNIIT}IfIETAI stAati.tx,. Jan: sz. To sink the °flat—per stone oz 81b. Reef, 4s. ad. to 'ss; 6d. 1 Veal, 4s z , Sd. to A . Mutton, 45.. 04. to.6sw Poik, ss. 4 d. to , 6'. 17 litAn O 1 CATTLIV Tills DAY Blasts 2DOC; . —Sheip §sou. NEWGATE and J. EADENIIALL MARKET, Jan - ft ' Sect; 3s. ou. to ss, act. f Vcat, 4s. 'od. to c•: 1 , Mutton, 3s. M. to ss. 4dl, ss• 4.1. to to• k 3 -,.... .'A L LOW. 'i _ ~ , l' - 7' mvrt T ALinsv.7cs.. lot , .. RtlScla itb . ( C 41 li i . ;61i ' 7 ''' ' Ittt,43ia(fo. (Soap') 6 "; t• .''''.4' . .A . Littiug stuff . 565 , - ,4 pitto. rough 37 5 . 3 ii, G TII 4 .TS ~ . •16 i . °J. QO -0, . biegt. lls, 4 'l'(.ytt,leit, ss, -Curd, 5'i5.:...,, FRICE 01' 1' St. James's Market 45. id, Clare Market 43. rd. ‘Vhitech4pel Itlitekkl 4r. id. per stone of 811), _ Its. 3d Axtrage pric& 4s. Id Yellow Soap, 7-4.. a Sos..:-.•-1A) . . St. JAAfES's HAY . 141 . Ait.K.LT, fan. i e Hay, 51. 'IS: act. 061. 12s. 0t.1.-4-A J. los ad.-A ver. - -I. 4- , , . 4 , 4 Straw, 21. Os. 6d. to 21- 1 4 4 - 0"--41ver• It mmuctr, Tao. "' Hay, 41-. log. od, to 61.'6.. pd.—Aver. 4 1, oil ; , Clover * , 61. 61'.71. cd,--iver.. 61. 0 . .. •EF"• , . Steatv,-11. 4s. rto 21. los. Od.—:Asver. 2r: 7S• Oa* DISTANT COUNTRY MARKETS. Nawouß Jan,.S. • . A; Wheat, ta6s.ad. th 1565. ( Ai. Oats, 5.4. 01. to 4 : 1 1 - " 4 74; Bader, sVr. od: to M. od: BeAps; 725. 04. w bil. RPADINC, Wheat i •iigs. ocl. 'to tszs. 61. New, es. old. Earley, sgs. 44. to pSs. Jan. Oati, 19s. off., to es. ett f ; Brans, 78;:od. •Peaw, gos. cid: to Sts. Thvtzts,jimil. • , J . r. wheat, /18s. hd. to rs6s..od. Mai, 3Si. od: to 4 2 ,`. Barley, 645. al. to 84s. oil peans,.74s, 94.„,t? WAilfutsr Wheat, 1365. (Kit bd. 795. ;3d. to Sts. ott. E*, lan. tn. , to 52cs Reins E4s tO 94&.u"'