The Sun. — London, England, 1804-06-28 00:00:00

APPEAL TO , TITE - NATION. A Constitutional Question has been ought for ward in a recent•Pttb:ic.ttinn, by a, N!,bie Lord, .6n the ppoinm:nt_•of His - I+,l j jesry's late and. present Ministers., •Asl.admire.the ardour of a young Po. litician I 5 Italll),iss ovtfr this- palpable contradictions ut an overweening zeal, with tills remark, hoWever, that toe No , le Writer:stands certainly entitled ma laurel for frcgtiently - deleating—himself, He has taken up the bow of Mr. BURKE, as the arms of a giant in political warfare. This, how ever, is the bow vihich, before his death, having 'first wept over it, BURKE unstrung, broke in pieces, and threw aside. The scattered- fragments of..it *lre now, gathered by a N hie hand—but in vain I M r. BURKE, truly sensible of his errors in attacking the Monarchical Pow er of the Constitution,confessed anddeplored these mischievous sacrifices made by him to the, ambitious purposes, of Party. The Leaders of Faaion during tie day being vigorously oppos- . ed i by, the - virtuous resistance of the Sovereign ligAnsf such inroads upon the Constitution, resolved to clip the wings of Royal Influence, in order to de. militate the power of_ Majesty, From this con spiracy of a FaeliOn against Monarchical Power arose the well-known Resolution, which combined the general princil les of BURKE into one substan tial form for pratlical application, under these words, " The influence of the Crown has increased, is increasing, and ought to be diminished." Such ebullitions of Parliamentary frenzy, and the mis. guiding arthqrr of that genius which had supplied fuel to the flames, became however -cause of deep sorrow and private cnmpundion to that great man, previous to his last moments. _ Herein, therefore, h contained a sufficient answer to all that is urged, and it is the substance of the Noble Writer's Tract, under the sanction of Mr. BURKE'S authority : for that authority stands stripned, by the renowned Author himself, of all its weight in this Noble Writer's support. I shall not in'rude further on the reader's notice the nume. rous and erroneous misconceptions in this Trael, where the theory of the Constitution, beauteously decked out in one line, falls like a sacrifice in the next to the confussi nof praClicai application. But I shall proceed to a view of the, question, wherein the Constitution will be found in perfed coincidence with the last sentiments of Mr. BURKE. " The principles of the British Constitution are Clear, strong, and explicit, on the point at issue, theoraticatly and practically, that the KING has by his Prerogative. the sole Power to appoint, tire Corn mons the sole Right to accuse, and the Peers the sole Privilege to judge his Ministers." No ingenuity can fritter away these principles, no reasoning invalidate or Undermine them. Any word or action hostile to these principles is not oply repugnant to moral feeling and to right rea son, but it is violatory of the Constitution. This dodrine is not framed for any present purpose of Party, like a shield to be spread over Mr. AD; DINGTON'S or Mr..P.mr's appointment ; it is the spirit of the Constitution defendieg the just Preto gative of His MAJESTY, in the exercise of his sole liight—the choice of His Missittees. The progress of E'aftion in this Country, during the period Lila few years, though imperceptible per. helps to some at first, has now made such inroads up on the British Government, that the departure from the constitutional form must be obvious to all men who will only open their eyes. It is not long since our Fathers boasted of British Monarchy.— But where is the Monarchical Power at this day, where .is the Aristocratic Power, or what is 'the Power of the People, if a few interested families and a. few ambitious men can form a Parliamentary &Won paramount to all ; if the Fiat of this Par liamentary FaClion, like the sentence of Diffitors, can dispose of Peace or War, consign our lived and properties to the purposes of their private interest, seize upbn the Offices of State, overturn the Rights of Majesty, and barter the places of trust and power to their mean minions and unprincipled sup porters ? Let those Gentlemen beware l In France, me of the Aristocracy, — Maddened by ambition, joined with certain popular Leaders for the usurp:. tio'n of power., They !.ucceedtd. Beginning first in the Parliaments, the Kt of FRANCE' was gra dually reduced by them to pretty much the same rigure as the k?i de carreaux.. Having gOtten the ,1%.1 tic, and cons. quently throUgh the Kingly Au'. t h or ' o y, t h e Nopte, into their hands, they hoped to 'null! both like.D.icqators. Bat the People feeling this, and seeing Royalty stripped of its . power, turned upon them, snatched the power from their hands, and hided both this Fattion and Royalty under liorrihie' Revolutionary roins. And what followed ? Who reigned then ? .Wht; reigns now ? History is a sage and awful IVlonitOn. But let us recur to the Constitution, and listed to its voice also. Not only the People are barred by the Constitu tion from all interference-with the appointment of Ministers, but the Pdtlionient likewise. I shall pruve this : but it may not be imi,loper, previous to this Constitutional Defence of His Majesty's Preragatiie, to Ihew concisely that it is• chorally incompatible with the Fonftions of tit . e Houses Of Lards and Commons to nominate or two - recommend Mittibteri. The House of Lords „cannot do this, because they itte'thetr j udges: Wet they to sit in judgment on -such persons tbr'rnai.:idminisi ration, whom' they had : . hemselves eltokn and appointed, this would in fa Ft be sitting in judgment on their own anions. And in like manner, were the House of Commons to inare or . recommend Ministers, and these •Mini- lters . to prove cfilprits,•what impartial justice could be expetted from such sham prosecutions, where ;he Commons would be prosecutors, and the Lords jctigis, of Ministers nominated or recommended by -themselves ? These ideas certainly appear repug. rant, in a moral and judicial view. Let us now con- loit the Ctynstitution: Groaning for ages beneath a weight of tyranny, il;rough the abuse of power and contests o 6 ambition, cur•ancestors were at length consolidated into one gcneral body sufficiently powerful to resist those op _p!essions. Lashed by contending tyrants, as by .etvith or recomniending the nomination of Ministers, is such.a stride towards a Republic, and - so tory of the Constitution, as well- as repugnant to moral and judicial views, that His MAJESTY would manifest his love of the Constitution, -and of the- Liberties and Fundamental Laws of his Subjeas,' by dissolving any Parliament , which should presume on. such interference or recommendation. maintain is constituti ,, nal dO:trine, and whatever is constitutional, is right for every honest Briton to support. L AW REPORT. COURT OF KING's BENCH, TUNE 20. • .s THE KING STUTCHEY. This was an IndiEtment. against the Defendant, containing two counts; the one for an assault with intent to ravish; the other for a common assault on Elizabeth, the wife of John Kilby. Mr. GAR kow opened the case for s the Prosecu tion, and treated it as one of the most important causes he ever witnessed in a Court of justice. The husband of the Prosecutrix was a painter by profession, and a respectable man, living in War. - : dour- - Street, who had been married to his present wife about twelve months, who was a virtuous; young woman, well educated by her parents, her father being a reputable farmer at Ealing. The .Defendant was a farrier at the . same place, and had known the Prosecutrix ever since she was four years of age, and all her family, from that time to the .present, and was extremely well acquainted with them, visiting them almost daily. In the fh onth of February last the Prosecurrix's mother and sister paid her a visit in town; at their return, being a little too late for the stage, they went to the "General Wolfe," in Oxford-street, and waited for an hour or more before they got a returning post-chaise to take them home, a nd they went. away leaving the Prosecutrix, who had accompanied them thither, in the care of the Defendant, whd, by the desire of her mother, and as a friendly neigh bour, undertook to conduft her safe home; but he betrayed that sacred trust, and when he came to the corner of Woodstock court, forced her into a howe of ill_fame, where he committed this assault. -.Fail ing in the objeet of his wishes, he huiried her into a coach, and took her home, where,• together with the good woman of the h in Woodstock street, he saki that she had fallen in alit in the street, and that they had done every thing in their poWer to support and. assist her ; but she, -in their presence, related the whole story of the ill-treatment she had . met with. She was- received at home .by Miss Smithers ; a young Lady, an assistant at a school, and living in the same house with the Prosecutrix..• The subjed being related to the husband of itba. Prosecutrix, this prosecution was instituted. The whole - of this case •was most circumstantially detailed by the Prosecutrix herself, who swote most positively that every thing that was done to her in this attempt, the °Vied of which 'was not accom plished, was done by violence and' against her will: that she did not give to the Defendant the slightest encouragement : that she took one glass of shrub at the General Wolfe public-house, with her mother . and sister, while they waited for- the chaise, 'and once just touched a drop of brandy and water, but nothing else except tea; that she was pettedly sober. In which she was corroborated by the, evi a dence of her mother and her sister, 'who swore most positively that she was perfedly sober,' and that she used no liberties with the Defendaor, hut, in every respell, conduaedherself as a married woman ought. Miss Smithers swore, that the Prosecutrix quite sober when she came home, at Which time she made the charges now exhibited against the De. fendant and the woman. who came with him in the , coach, whb, when asked where she lived, said' site lived in Oxford-road, &c. On the part 'of the Defendant, -Mr. Easteters made an eloquent speech, saying his Client was a sober, honest, prudent, moral man, the husband of a modest wife, and the father of four children, and much reipeded in his neighbourhood ; that. he took the care of the Prosecutrix at the request of her . masher, and endeavoured to co n dutt her home from this public . -house, but that she was' so entirely in.._ toxicated as not to know wh a t she wa s doi n g ; th at he had all imaginable difficulty in - conduaing her, and that when he camel() the corner of Woodstock..• court, he found site could proceed no farther, ; that he went with her to a. house ethe re to rest her, where she was kindly treated; and then taken in. a coach to her own house, and that the Defendant treated her as if she had been his own sister, and took her home ; that whatever violence she suffer ed was fiom her own fury, in consequence of her intoxication: that site was so intoxicated, at the General Wolfe, as to have been noticed by the waiter to take very improper liberties with the De fendant, &c. for these reasons the Defendant would be entitled' to his acquittal. But he admitted that if guilty, his Client was- the most profligate and abandoned of men. The crime with which he was charged - was all but a capital offence, and for Which; if guilty, he ought to suffer any thing but death— but lie was instructed that the Defendant was not guilty. The Waiter of the General Wolfe swore, that he attended the whole company, which consisted of the Prosesutrix and her mother and sister, the Defen dant, and a companion of his, Mr. Nunns, 'a miller, at Ealing ; they had no less than eight shilling glasses of brandy and water. That the Ladies had each a glass of shrub when 'they came in—had,half, a pint of brandy mixed in their tea, and the Ladies had each a glass at the barat parting—that theProsecu. trixdrank freely the whole time,became much intoxi cated, and behaved very freely with the Defendant -- 7 that, they embraced and kissed each other fre quently, and that the Prosecutrix put her arms around the Defernient's neck, tickled him, &c. &c. that all t hi s was open, and no pains taken to conceal it, althou g h the Prosecutrix and her mother were quite near each other, and her sister was there. The Defendant was in the habit of also frequenting this house. Nurms,. the miller, gave evidence to the same points but no t t o the same extent ; but he was the Defendant's bail, and evidently wished to favour him. LUNI)UN : _Printed by BUCHANAN M'MILLAN, (of Bow-Street, Covent-Gaiden); and Published by W ILLIA)4 ARMIGRR SC R/PPS , (of South M o i thn At the Stiti.Ors , Ic a , N o , z, Strad ; where ild6vertfierzetrts, Ordrrs f ur the Paler, Lett ers f or t h e Editor, Vic. (pcit-paidit Street, G rosverler-sy wire); oust be acidrestc.:, two tides, they rose up like, an, eternal barrier to the incursions-of either: So far reached, the Preroga. • tive ot Majesty. Thus far was the privilege of the - Peer to come. And here stood the People, formidable their strength, to maintain the balance of both, determined to support, for each, a n d f or a ll, Lib erty . Ands.o long as they are thus checked and balanced by the pOwer 'of • each other, the Commons cannot become Republican, the Nobles Aristocratic, nor the Monarch - a Tyrant. lioWever, though by the joint operations of their wisdom, and by their • united assent,. all laws are established ; yet the KING alone is the executor of these laws. And hence he req{iires all the force and j tint aid of wisdom to give energy and moderation to his ac tions. He is therefore invested with various Preroga. tives, whose Bounds may be extended, but cannot be coniraded ; and amongst others, with that of ap pointing his Ministers. But, though the Executive Power appoints, it is the Parliament which pays His Majesty's Ministers. For were they to appoint them they would become the Executive Power, and the.government would he Republican. And were they to appoint, and to pay the Ministers, it would be most highly dangerous. For those appointments, in such a Republican system, would soon be guided by Party, and the same Factious influence, which should prevail in the one instance, would not with.. hold the wages of iniquity, nor restrain the opines. sions of the Minister in another : hoping soon .to possess the same power themselves, and to enjoy the same reward and the same immunity. It is therefore constitutional, and it is altogether agreeable to right reason and justice, that as the Ministers are the Confidential Servants of His MA., J ESTY, called to aid him in his councils and execti: tive trust, he alone should nominate them. For, by the Constitution, though they be answerable for their administration, and he can do no wrong, that is, his person is inviolable, yet the Revolution hath taught us that the cmdttd 'of the Mini ster, which is Obedience to the Monarch, has shaken the Monarch from the throne. &mold nor the So.. vereign, therefore, have the exclusive, uninterrupt ed, unbiassed nomination of that Servant whose ape. rations must always afea his Government, and may perhaps endanger his NiOnarcitical power ? It is his Constitutional Right : 'it is a reasonable Preto gative of Majesty. The power of impeaching those Ministers is, however, lodged with the Coornons ; because the Executive Power exists but for the advantage of the Poblic. If the Minister, however, of that Power, direct it not to the good but to the hurt of the Pub lic, then it behoves the Representatives of the Peo. ple, who are - their immediate Guardians, and with whom the sacred trust of their Rights is deposited, to step'forward and prosecute this Nlal-administra. tion. AU laws and conventions, with resped to the limitations of Regal Power may be broken : the refusal of Subsidies, however, in such cases, which ,is an immediate weapon against the King in the hands of the Commons, might afred the whole State, and therefore ought not to be with-held: but Sub sidies, when obtained; may likewise be applied dif ferently to their design . : as the dernier resort, and the engine of salvation against such abuses of Power, the Minister is answerable with his head. The People, who are the sinews of Government, have 'consequently committed their strength into the hands of their Representatives, arming them with the collcdive powers of the Nation ; and the Con stitution authorizes and commands the Commons to thunder forth their vengeance in Impeachments, sum, tnoning'His Majesty'. Mitisters to death when guilty of public crimes. Such is the Right of the Commons. . The importance of deciding on crimes of such magnitude is best fitted to the supremacy of the Peers, who form the High Court of Judicature in other causes. Hence they are Judges in the first instance, from whose decision in the last there lies no appeal. Nor can we sufficiently admire the wisdom of the, Constitution, which has established this judicial power. High dignity and circumstances of ratik render . these Judges independent : their ho nour springs up with'and gathers strength froni ele vation : they judge openly befpre the Public, 'fling open their doors tor their admission, and print'their proceedings for their inspeCtinn ; they axe partly composed of, and always attended by the ablest In terpreters of the Law. Can imagination devise a Court superior in its arrangements can the present wisdom of the Universe, or all the Monument of Antiqujty, boast its equal ? Such is the exalted Fri. vilege of the Peers. (in 'these solid gtotinds, acc'rding to the Consti. Lotion, are the - Peers to shin judgment on Mini sters,-and the Commons to prosecute them. But if, contrary to the great principles of the Constitu. Lion; the Commons were both to nominate and to prosecute, or the• Lords to nominate and to judge, then the King might pardon his Ministers. Where. as, now the impeachment is brought against the Ministers of the Monarch; nominated by hiinse?f, for the purposes of Executive Power, and this impeach. ment may be founded even on obedience to his man. dates. He, therefore, ought not to interfere. For thus he would support his own illegal corrsmands, by setting aside the condemnation of his Ministers. Thus too he would mock the Power of the People, by shielding his Minister's head, that only objel for national vengeance and example. For on the Minister alone can the Commons by impeachment invoke, or the Peers by judicial authority pro nounce sentence ; and not on the Sovereign. This would be to invest themselves with Executive Power ; because, as the Sovereign alone has the _.. . _ _ _ Right of Mercy and Pardon, so it is his awful Fiat that gives force to a Dcath.warrant. Whoever assumes that right over him, becomes ipso fado the Supreme anti Executive Power; and with the KING the Monarchy expires. Hence that wise maxim, " the KING can do no wrong." These Constitutional reasons are, I conceive, suf ficient and satisfaCtory ; to which, however a mul- titude of ethers could he adduced, to display the wisdom of the Sovereign's sole Prerogative to nomi nate his Ministers, the Right of the Commons to prosecute their crimes, and the privile ge of the Peers to judge them. Any deviation from these fixed principles of our Monarchical Government, by, either or both House; of Parliament interfering t A ‘Vatettron, as he passed WoodstottcoOf” fiear.i the noise -of P cis c tei ; carte up,- ` " '' 3 found- her lying d'owii at the door. of a Litoe crying out for her husband and her brother. He :thought, from' her bie'ath, that she was in liquor. "Abigail 1 - loi;e swore, that at the house in Wood " , • .stock -court, tYie Prosecutrix was treated with . 10nd. ness, as well as all the way in the coach, by th e Dekndant. - S!le sent for a glass of brandy for•het —went with her in the coach. The Witness said she was to be found at a hotelier's in Oxford-road but did nit say that she lived in Woodstock-cour t ' where she' had lived fifteen months. There were' but three houses in it, two of them were of ill fain but the one in which the Witness lived had °nit good people in it. From the manner of this Wit' ness, it was evident/that chastity was a virtue she had long disregarded. • Another witness of the same kind was 'examined on the same side. Mr. GARR ow having replied, and insisted that the Defendant's case had been supported by perjury', • Lord ELLENBOROUGH summed up the whole to the Jury, observing to them, that if they believed the waiter, 'the D e f en d ant. wou ld b e en titled to hi' acquitual ; for by the evidence of that witness the Prosecutrix had att ac k e d t h e .Thfendant in su ch manner as to lose the proreftibn Which the law a forded to her ; but his L or d s hi p did no t , t hink toe evidence•Of the waiter satisfatiory. He then left the rest of the evidence to the Jure, to draw f 5 -- a : It the conclusion whi c h ap p eare d to t h em to he j u he Tie Jury found th e D e f en d an t G u ilt) 1 whale Charge stated in the Indidfnenr. The Defendant ; whohad been' in Court f or the' greater part of the triad, withdrew before the c ut " elusion of it, - • . " - —"---- - We some months ago called the •attention of 0 11 t. Readers to i RenredY discovered by a Ctergy'roi lti. for all. tlie - diedlui:Disorders proceeding from ti le , Biic, which, at t his se a s o n of the year, sinews itself in many alarming - Shapes :. We notice, With pleasure , the yery distinguished patronage the Rev. Win. Bar-. t lay'sPaten(Anti BiliouS Pills have o'btpined, which no other Patent Medicine irirthe Kibg,icitn' can boast of, and whicri - c6rnirizes some of the highest ch imilott , btedly, the .raders in the Kin g d om .—This ii, f .most convincing proof -of the Super ior virtues o a; :thcse celebrated Pills. -- SHIP NEWS. _ POOLE, JUNE 26. fora Arrived—FriendShip; G Mary, Active, Wiffiartts, e' . Portsmouth; Falcon, Ranson, from Christiara ; rous, Mitchell, from Ipswich. for Sailed—Betsy, Collins, for Bristol. Hope, Beatie., Lyme; Brothers, , Lambert, f:r Christchurch; Dart, 1 ‘ )111° ? for Portsmouth;•• j uno, Northover, for .Liv,:rpooi. BIRTU. Lately, at Be,autrinnt Cottage, , e Lady of the Don: CaP t. Richard King, of a son. DIED. • &ilk+ On the,y4t4 inst. at her tather's house, near ' Miss Gataker, the only daughter o f Thomas Gata.ike.r,DiL:, On Sunday night last, at St. Pancras, Mr. Ethvi!'a cornbe, formerly of the Strand. re STOCKS. YESTERDAY. 6 Bank Stock, tc4 Bankl.ohg Ann. 1.L 6 Navy clier t. en,. shut l Ditto Short .6' o ' 3 s,peiaCent. 1797,134 6 India Stock Irish 5 per Cent: 0 inniuni.4 rent. 54 4 per Cent. 72 I nip',A-ial 3 per per Cent. Red. 55 a Ditto Ann. 9 77 I 3 per et Con. shut Cons, for July, PRIC4 0 SPENCER AND PERKINS, - /15f TINE and BRANDY Merchants. n ° • d GE- V V Newgate-street, the only sellers of 0 I.D. an ,..,froat NUINE - ,WINE, meliorated in Vats, conrainint, Two to Four Thousand 'Gallons, and viiio froil ' ) w i„, l teen years experience of keeping - -inch quantities t ro ora in one vessel, can assert,. that their Wine is nut 0 01, agreeable in flavour, but, from its strength of bodYi to and cordial qualities, is more restorative and witol:t-60 r' c i;: ge ,ii the stomachs of weakly and nervous habitF , , and h,,,,,ect arid infirm. They have Port, which, 'after being. r " , t wq is a Vat, containing zo pipes, has been in bottle t r°l l l lis-7 to seven years. Their Nladetra, Sherry, Bucella , „„ing bon, are equally old and excellent. This mode el'e.;,`oo,l gives their Wines that decided superiority so well klov",,tvg acknowledged. Their immense stuck enables tneol, 0 6 . their Friends with superior Win; of the best vi , " ji s s e pti tO their usual moderate terms, for ready money. , ) %cpeo ce ' any part of the town (nut. less than a dozen) bee °. Tigeyhave also a large stock .of old Cognac 1 3 (, n . 1 : ; and }Jamaica Rum, East India and Ruin OtiiaLe 511 ^ _A `A 11 - R IP.. es N Professional,,.i Men . of 7,!: ----- tiuCe“ .l9ll .:). Mr the li e seie6tion po o n t s a i.,: ) .. e i c t t y d u ja e r va r tf frum the general Si itii t l e g . co . ;••• tiPuted success is the best critgor l :o l l i . t s e uili 'a e[i ' o ti n sf t ß Y : . ~.„c e ltls l.res 1 Eight years have I devoted. my practifie tri the— „it 0. treatment of Three Disorders, and clic successfu l i cs- an , tiq plan gives me additional ardor )trtirtlio,s".(,,,:iiiiisi - . f a . r t e r a 5 I most the too able, the ravages of those important in the Catalogue of I Lo t man Infirmities. „coo. titter initiation into every • Branch, as an' /.I.O I Y s° '" e in.! I..tiormed a wish at an ear ly per i o d o f F ra ctice .to rescu r to &victuals from the ignorance of uneducated' men , f a R ge E : A A L n iI i, NF I E su C y I::::: i whether of 3 recent equally dangerous precipitancy ot general- l'r 6 t, i ' i l l lA e de' . The Three Disorders, to the Curc,... 01 vv.l!O "..• --- v v E N 6" voted my attention, comprise every species oi, - ~.. ration: zdly, All kinds of debility, whether es g f arising the habits of schbor-boys, or the inditinces. a ( orangernea ;. E . E kl I. 1 "l . ' i . men which is called•B Aitß EN ".1 l': S s' or or Itasca Numerous Diseases at., toe reslilt of ignorance, iv in the treatment of a simple Gjitordixa; and it not . 11 ,.. , treiwently happens that the see' Id Life are poisot - 'd 7 . , others have failed, I trust that I the indiscretion of an unguarded hour.___By Seven 1 1 thrid such Complaints are. easily curett , - • and, even W he re . f I°flgfruoulo radical re-establishment. ils Few, however, are the cases of complicated distress 4 this disorder, compared wiLli the -calamitods situatiostro Men, who, trout an intii4ence in a solitary vice, or .„,c prevalent gaieties of a faslig)riabl: life, a cquire that si.'o, - t ot tho' system of Debility, which is the unavoidable consequence, of sti pernicious habits. but W here the unhappy sufferer broods over h.s misery , • carefully conceals his misfortune, it may be sonic Litton hit ham fo know, . that although it be an, ohle" "o va l doubt or uncertainty with other Practitirers, the tn ° , o ,, of these - lleticiencies by 'the graihf it progress of Kef“),te, doff, is the acquireinent of 'the` Experience. It the ri ., r , of Bacchus or Venus have began to r:duce Manly' vig°„ mu.ch anxiety . will he prevented. by an early (,ounteraLt tioti of this languid State; and in these cases,' no g r 'difficulty will occur.. ieS But where this Deficiency his for years existed, a PI, perseverance is irtdispeosab , •equisite to revive the.sltt - acting Sparks of Lite, and to re-animate the Constitutionited Mit It it 18i) W 0 M E N , Who ha V e long been c lisapP . , o ,' l „ i n tn tneir expeciations of a Family, may i be assured, t'!; ), most instances, such detecis are curabie by Medical s.i,"cog, The seeresy winch is so ess.:ntial to my :i.n(le rq " w in and the qualifications which i h:ore presumed to state, stio the basis ot rity pretension, l _lb.; in coincidence state, this intimation is given, .that Mr. Bree may be c"" at pis personally, or - by Letters (inclosing a Small Note) , ie pr. house, No, 29, Arundel street, Strand, near Ten l P _ a l. Water -so Cs - There is an additional Entrame in adjoining, and the Natlle is tin both the doors. .t . surecns.. Martin hree, Member ot the Ito9i College 0. - '". may -presume to inti.o -