The Sun. — London, England, 1832-04-03 00:00:00

(2 "X de' . • .... A - b.. , ..,........_ - ... • _i ''' `••' - y• I r v ., ... , 1 N, ~..,... "...,---:•,‘ 4.,.._, (1 ,. 4l - ~ ~-.. li .r • i -- —r..,. ,„. ---. ,_. iii - ;: - s' - 'V , , ---- :' . i. ,-( ,- ..- - 2----.--- • „,... - . C. 11 441 - *... ....V J.--- , " / - 0 a -, ,- - V, - --# - :0. 414. .._, ~ .. . N., -.,5, . nn .K. , ~.. ~.. ' t 1 i !• 'r, ci: 14- - , 5... A. —*- ~.. r.P%-x4r4 •• , , i . 44 „, .... . ?4 , , •--<,--.,e3 , 4 4--% 4', , ,i 1 . - • " ',. -`-'' t ,- . . , -.0 •,-: .. , Pe / La 7,,," saving se' nblic. l He woulrl not then press Sir J. C. Hobboitsrfor explanation on the abuses which had grown out of the usage of pensinners Melling their interests t s captains of vessel, yvitb a view loemi t ration, ae teat R aht Nan. Baronet of he exp-et.d th be yet tn,-ter of eery recently succeeded, but IVbia2`taks advastap of an early nity of inviting his attention to the general business of he War-office, particularly as it referred to his (Sir H. Har dinges) arrangement. Sir J. 110bHOUSE regrett•d the absence of the l ate Secretary at War, because that Rig,t H , n. Gentleman was mach better able than he to give an an wer to 0., e 'tstement which had just been made. But must be permitted to say that considerable doubts were ewrrta,n d at the War-office whether the plan recomoo tided by the Right Hon. Gentleman would pr“ve beneficial to the public. Ile knew that it was the opinion of ..ome indivi duals that Government had in many instances improperly allowed a commutation of pension. All he could say wa., that every representation on that subject whico should be communicated to Government, would receive the attention it deserved. TO THE PROPRIETORS OF EAST INDIA STOCK. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE ELECTION of SIX DIREC TORS of the EAST INDIA COMPANY be ing appointed for WEDNESDAY, the 1 Ith April next, the favour of your Vote and Interest is requested for the fol lowing Gentlemen,. viz.:— WILLIAM ASTELL, Esq..: RUSSELL ELLICE, Esq. CAMPBELL MARJORIBANKS, Esq. JOHN MASTERM AN, Esq. CHARLES ELTON PRESCOTT, Esq. GEORGE SMITH, Esq. will intieh.ohligei Ladle; anti Gentlemen, Your humble Servants, James Law Lushington Robert Campbell George Lyall John Goldsborough Ravenshaw Charles Milli Josias Du Pre Alexander John Morris Henry Alexander John Petty Muspratt John Baillie George Raikes James Rivett Carnac Henry Shank William Stanley Clarke James Stuart Neil Benjamin Edmonstone John Thornhill 4W:wit Cutlar Fetgusson Henry St. George Tucker John Forbes William Wi gram Hugh Lindsay William Young John Loch. Eist India House, March 28, 1832. Loi , sim:s, TUESDAY EVENING, APRIL 3, 183.2. (No. 12,342.1 (PRICE 7D PRIVATE EDUCATION. SECON II) EDITION. SUN OFFICE, Seven o'Cloch•. lotted, because it had been long before their Lordship% raving been introduced by several Governments, there. ore the merits of it must be well known. The later Nobleman said that while he presided in the Common Ph as Pleas in Ireland, a copy of the Bill was sent to him ot which he approved, and he believed that out of all the Learned Judges in Ireland only one had given his opinion against the Bill. Lord WYNFORD had objections to several clauses in this Bill. He must particularly object to that clause which enacted, that the names of all that were liable to serve on juries should be stuck up for • a long time in some public place. The occurrences which had recently taken place in Ireland, had shewn that that would not only be objectionable, but would lead to the most dangerous results. Lord ELLENBOROUGH would wish, before making such an alteration in the law as this Bill would do, that tl e opinion of all the Judges in Ireland should be taken upon lhe subject. He had a great respect for the opinion of the Noble and Learned Lord (Pfunket), but still in a matter of such importance, he should expect that the opinions of others would he laid before the House. He felt certain, in his own mind, that the Bill as it at present stood, and in these times, could not-:last twelvemonths.—(Hear, hear.) All that lie wanted was, that Government would not press forward the Bill, till they had the opinion of all the judges on the b nch in Ireland upon the sti‘ject, as they must neces sarily be most conversant with it. Lsrd MELBOURNE could not express his surprise at the very great opposition which had been made to to this Bill, and he could not but think the Noble Lord did not un derstand its objects. Every body was aware that a Bill was some time introduced into the House for the consolida ti n oldie Jury Law in Ireland. It was thought be Go vernment that it would be advisable to adopt the same principle with respect to the Jury Law of Ireland. — (Hear, hear.) When he (Lord - M.) came into power he formed a Bill' something like the present had been prepared by the Right Hon. Baronet who had pre ceded him in office. With respect to the opinion of the Judges, he (Lord Melbourne) felt it his duty to state that he did communicate with the Judges, and requested their opinion, not in an official manner, but for his own information, and that of the Government under which he acted. However much he might respect the opinion of those Judges, and however much he might think it necessary on the part of Government when they made alterations in the Law to learn from those personages what the effect of those alterations wonld be, he did not think that the House was responsible to those judges as to the policy of adopting the principles. If he recollected rightly, one or two of those Judges did make very strong objections to the measure of the remainder of them;—(Hear.)—however, some approved, and some paid no attention to it at all. Since that, however, he believed alterations had been made in the Bill, which met some of the objections which had b:en urged by the Learned Judges. He did not think that the arguments of the Noble Baron were at all ap plicable to the present stage of the Bill, and he saw no reason founded upon them why the House should not go into the Committee, and by that means put the Bill in as good a shape as they possib'y could. It might then be seen what parts there wer e objections to, and the validity of those objections might then be argued. He agreed with the Noble B iron that considering the present state of Ireland, it wag not a time for rash and speculativ e legislaion. He did not know any thing more calculated to make a good impression on the minds of the peopl e of that country than the introduction of a rhea-tire which was calculated to give them a favourable view of the impartiality of justice. Lord ELLENBOROUGH had heard the speech of the Right Hun. Viscount with surprise and great pain.— (Cries of " Spoke, spoke. The Marquis of WESTMEATH observed that he would weave tue adjournment of the House in order to afford the Noble Lord an opportunty of further addressing the House. AVACANCY for a PUPIL is now open in the FAMILY of a MARRIED CLERGYMAN. resident Twelve Miles from London, the numb-r ~t whose Pupils is limited to Six. He can offer the most satisfactory References to Noblemen and Gentlemen whose Sons have been intrusted to him. [LIE LONIMN GAZETTE Letters to be directed for the Rev. A. 8., to the care of Mr. Searle, Bookbinder, 77, Lower Grosvenor-stre,t, London. THIS EVENING. BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. - - WILLI ANI MAYELL, High-street, Exeter, jeweller and silversmith. . . . Mr. HUMS could not coincide in the opinions expressed by Sir H. Hardinge with respect to commutations of pen sions. He considered that every inducement oeght to be held out to pensioners to go and settle in the Brnish colo nies. He could not but comphin of the extrava2ant manner in which pensions kid been granted since 1814 He had himself seen many men who were pensioners per fectly fit for, and capable of, active •ervic,. ; and hr should he glad to know from the Noble Lord, the Paymaster of the Forc-e, if be had in contemplati, n any measure, or if aliney(sstlerp.sb4d be Hume) e 6 r ei t i a e k v e ed n, h t a o d pu r n on is n h iv t e l? j o a se t il o w ffi tz e%rs nti w iie ho . m f improper pensions. He WM alto of ophiion that pensions should not now, in times of peace, be granted nu the sense terms as in times of vcs.r. TO THE PROPRIETORS OF EAST INDIA STOCK. LADIES AND GE NTLE3IEN, HAVING the honour of being recommended to you by the Directors of the East ludia Com pany, as Candidates for the Direction, to be chosen this year; c4ie take the .Liberty of requesting the Favour of your vote on the Day of Election, WEDNESDAY, the 11th April next. This day was published, in I vol. with a Portrait, MEMOIRES DE HORTENSE, DUCIIESSE DE ST. LEU, EX-REINE DE 1-IOLLANDE. Printed for Colburn and Bentley, New Burlingtor street. HENRY DEAN, Nelsvn-street, Greenwich, tobacconist. NATHANIEL THOMAS, Manchester, upholsterer. BANKRUPTS. • JAMES AUBREY, Hattton-garden, money-scrivener, to sur render April 11, at two, and May 15, at ten, at the Court of Banruptcy. Cookney, Bedford-row. JOSEPH B ADCOCK, Schrivenharn, Berkshire, linen-draper, April i 9 and May 15, at two, at the Bush Tavern, Bristol. Bush and Prineaux, Bristol; Holme, Frampton, and Loftus, New Inn London. RICHARD THORNTON, Horsham, Sussex, common_ brewer, April 19 and May 15, at eleven, at the Court of Bank ruptcy. Bousfield, Chatham-place, LOndon • Lamb, Horsham JAMES BEARD, Marple Bridge, Derbyshire, corn-dealer, April 21, 24, and May 15, at two, at the York Hotel, Manchester. Milne, Parry, Milne, and Morris, Temple, London ; Wood, Bullock Smithy, Derbyshire. ROBERT ELLIS, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, mercer, April 13, at one, and May 15, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Tilleard and Miller, Old Jewry. J A MES DIE RCER, Thrapston, Norlhamptonsh ire, Innkeeper, April 14, and May 15, at eleven, at the White Hart Inn, Thrapston. Sanders, Hart-street, Bloomsbury-square, London; Archbould, Thrapston. ROBERT BUNTING, St. John-street, Clerkenwell, lap , dary, April 13, at one, and May 15, at ten, at the Bankruptcy Court. Spyer, Broad-street-buildings; G. J. Graham, official assignee, Copthall-buildings. HENRY TOON, Cornwall-road, Waterloo-road, grocer, April 6, and May 15, at eleven, at the Bankrupty Court. Wil loughby, Clifford's-inn ; G. Green, King's Arms-yard, official assignee. SAMUEL HORSFALL, Sowerbridge, Yorkshire, dyer, April 18, and May 15, at ten, at the Office of Mr. Holyrode, Ha lifax. Jacques, Battye, and Edwards, Coleman-street, London ; Holyrode, Halifax. JOSEP W A THEN, Rodborough, Goucestersh ire, clothcir, April :25 and May 15, at eleven, at the Golden Cross Inn, Canis cross. Blower, Lincoln's-Inn-Fields, London; Croome and Son, Gloucestershire. We are, Ladies and Gentlemen, . . Your most obedient and most humble Servants, • WILLIAM ASTELL RUSSELL ELLICE CAMPBELL MARJORIBANKS JOHN MASTERMAN CHARLES ELTON PRESCOTT GEORGE SMITH. East India House, March 28, 1832. This day was published, Second Edition, with consider_ able additions, 2 vo's. Svo. 245. IR JONAH BARRINGTON'S PER- S SONAL SKETCHES of his OWN TIMES. " These volumes form a c,nto of Irish characters, Irish man ners, Irish adventures, Irish witticisms, and Irish opinions, for about fifty years ; and a more amusing melange has seldom issued from the Press."—Literary Gazette. Lord JOHN RUSSET L said that the inquiry to which the Hon. Member for Middlesex had eroded was Frogged init., and though many errors had appeared, yet, the in quiry- not being complete, it was premature to prejudge the subject. He differed from the Hon. Member as re garded a difference being made in the pssnsions in time of peace and those granted in time of war. He, however, concurred in the opinion expressed by the Hon. Member for Middlesex, that the recommendation of the Right lion. and Gallant Officer (Sir H.. Hardinse) would, if carried into effect, be generally injurious. Sir A. DALRYMPLE ttiouebt that the explanation with respect to the system of pen-ions which had been given by his Right Hon. and Gallant Friend (Sir H. Hardinee) was most complete and satisfactory.' Sir GEORGE MURRAY conceived, that in adopting the principle of commutation, the Govt• nment should not lose sight of placing the soldier out of any situation which would lead to improvidence on his part; and that those who proceeded under the commutation should zarr:r be lost sight of, until they were esta. Ebbed in V e colony to which they had attached themselves. He also thought that the Government should retain in its own hands the power of allocating the settlers, and that care should be taken to fix them in those colonies or districts, such as the vicinity of Lake Ontario, most liable to attack, which it would be well to have protected by soldiers, or those acctistemed to the use of arms. He could not sit down without express- . ing the satisfaction he felt in what had fallen from the Noble Paymaster of the Forces (Lord John Russell) that no difference ought to be made in peace or war with re spect to the rates of pensions. In that opinion he (Sir G. Murray) fully concurred. Colonel MABERLY thought it was full time that some attention should be paid to the pensions for military ser vices, with a view to their reduction. He therefore con curred in the plan adopted at the War-office of commuting pensions, _ _ _ Printed for Colburn and Bentley, S, New Burlington street. CRAVEN ARMS COMMERCIAL HOTEL AND POSTING-HOUSE, HIGH-STREET, COVENTRY. Just completed, in 3 vole, with Portraits, &c. MEMOIRS OF THE GREAT LORD BURGHLEY, Secretary of State in the of King Edward VI., and Lord High Treasurer of Eng • land in the Reign of Queen El'zaheth ; containing an His torical View of the times in which he lived, and of the many eminent and illustrious Persons with whom he was connected ; with Extract+ from his private Correspond ence and Journals, now first published from the Originals. TG. CHEADLE having taken and en • tered upon the above Old Established Hotel, most respectfully solicits the patronage of the Nobility, Gentry, and Commercial Gentlemen, and in so doing, pledges him self that every care shall be taken to render the Esta blishment, in all its departments, worthy the notice of those who may honour him with their favours, trusting by strict assidu.ty and attention to their comforts to merit that support which he respectfully solicits. N.B.—Posting at Is 3d. per mile. By the Rev. Dr. NARES, Regius Professor 'of Modern History in the University of _ Oxford. '‘ A work of the highest national interest."—Literary Gazette Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley, New Burlington street. ORCHARD-HOUSE GRAMMAR-SCHOOL, KINGSLAND ROAD. Published nn the 1.4 of April, IM VERIA L l'A R LIAMENI AT this Seminary Young Gentlemen are parentally treated, liberally boarded, and carefully instructed in every Branch of Learning necessary to Busi ness or Profession. The Premises and Grounds are open, extensive, very delightful, and require only to be seen to be approved. Being the property of the Advertiser, he can the better accommodate Parents and Guardians on the most moderate and inclusive terms. The Quarter will commence from the time of entering. Satisfactory references given and required ; and Letters to A. 8.. (post paid), will be attended to..—A Preparatory School is attached. THE WESTMINSTER REVIEW, No. XXXII., containing the following _ _ THIS EVENING. 1. St. Stmonianism, The Member-3. Chro nology-7.1. Stewart's Visit to the South Seas-5. Ame rican Law Retorms-6. National character of the Ro mans-7. Newton Forster, or the Merchant Service— S 3. Improvement of Condition of the Clergy-9. Mili tary Law-10. Silk and Glove Trades-11. Enhar monic of the Ancients-12. The Chameleon-13. Regu lation of Anatomy— 14. Lord Nugent's Memorials of Hampden-15 Jerrwie on Colonial Slavery-16. French Commerce—Postscript to the Article on St. Simonianism —lndex—List of Books, &e. No. XXXIII. will be published on the 30th of June. HOUSE OF LORDS. The LORD CHANCELLOR, the Duke of 111(71;110ND, and the Marquis of LANSDOWNE, sat to-day as his Majesty's Cotnrnissioners, when the Royal Assent was given to the Sugar Duties Bill, the London Bridge Approaches Bill, and sixteen private Bills. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE laid copies of certain reernt Orders in G.uneil on the table. The Earl of LONSDALE presented a petition from the noblemen, freeholders, &c., of the North Riding of York-hire, against Reform. OXFORD PETITION. BEAVER, HATS, the best in London for 21s. These inimiiahle Hats are superior to any hitherto offered to public notice ; their qualities consist of lightness, durability, preservation of shape, and lasting colour. In variety of form they stand unrivalled, being made to suit the mould of every face, and give the most favourable cast to the features. Super Hats, 18s. The Best, 21s. Fine Silk, Bs. 6d. Best ditto, 12s. Youths' Hats and Cape, and Gentlemen's Travelling Caps, in the greatest variety. 85, STRAND, corner of Cecil street. No connexion with any other house in the neighbourhood. Country Orders attended to for Money only. Take the measure by applying a piece of string where the hand goes. • Publi.hrd by R. Heward, 113, Strand. Agent for France, G. G. Bennis, Rue Neuve St. Augustin, No. 55, Paris. NEW TRAGEDY, With Interesting Note. i'n Ancient Ireland, Inscribed to S. T. COLERIDGE, E.g. Mr. GOULBURN contended that Hon. Gentlemen on his side of the House and himself did not object to a sys tem of commutation, hut that it should be done on fair terms, and that the Government should not have flits power to enforce commutation on other terms than the same object could be obtained by the party from a private Just published, in Bvo.. handsome cloth boards, price ss. THE DRUID ; a Tragedy, in Five Acts. With Notes on the Antiquities and Early History of Ireland. By THOMAS CROMWELL, Author of " Oliver Cromwell and his Times," &r. " This production was written as long since as 1820, and was then warmly praised by Mr. Coleridge. It is now printed."— Ballot. Colonel EVANS could not lee any reason why the sol diers serving in the infantry should be put on a difereut footing from the cavalry soldiers. Ile at the same time agreed that no difference should be made in pensions granted in time of war and those granted in peace. Lord HOWICK hail no hesitation in saying that the system which granted 50 acres of land to a poor man who was unable to maintain himself should be changed, and that instead of barren wildernesses, tracts should be granted capable of cultivation, and such as the colonist had been accustomed to see in his own country. To soldiers serving in the colonies who were anxious to adopt the com mutation, grants of land were now made according to the old regulation, and, from ,ccounts which had been re ceived from various of the colonies by Lord Goderich, the pensioners had generally turned out well,—a circumstance that he was sure would afford satisfaction both to the House and the country. PORTMAN-SQUARE. TO BE LET, FURNISHED, My Mr. REID, " The plot is well chosen, the conception of the more import ant characters bold and original, while the ♦ersification is flow ing and harmonious. The Tragedy is dedicated to Mr. Cole ridge, whose favourable opinion of it in MS. a dozen years ago, is recorded; a pregnant proof of Mr. Cromwell's more than Floratian modesty and judiciousness. Some valuable notes form a useful appendix to the drama."—New Monthly Magazine. " This work will be perused with considerable pleasure."— Metropolitan Magazine. "We have passages of great poetical merit. The notes are curious and valuable."—Sunday Times. " Mr. Czoinwell has thrown much incident and variety into his scenes, and considerable information into his notes. lie is a man of industry and talent."—Literary Gazettee. The author manifestly possesses a cultivated taste, and no small share of poetic power. The notes are more valuable than the original work."—Athenwum. " The druid ceremonies and superstitions are well illustrated in the present performance."—Literary Guardian. Son-in-Law and Sucers;or to the late Mr. JOHN ROBINS, (Of Warwick-House, Regent-street,) AGenteel Compact RESIDENCE, de sirably situate in the vicinity of Portman-square, adapted for the accommodation of a Bachelor, or Sm ill Family, and fit for immediate occupation. Particulars may be had of Mr. Reid, No. 170, Regent street. Lord ELLENsoaouGH gave way. The Duke of WELLINGTON admitted that a similar Bill to the present had been proposed six years ago, but the circumstances of Ireland were not the same then as they were now. The present Bill, however, was mate rially different from the English one. The Duke of LEINSTER said, he considered that some measure like the present was necessary in order to prevent occurrences taking place in Courts which were derogative to them. TO BE LET UNFURNISHED, WITH IMMEDIATE POSSESSION, By Mr. REID, London : Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper, Paternoster-row. Son-in-Law and Successor to the late Mr. JOHN ROBINS, (Of Warwick House, Regent-street,) riPHE PRINCIPAL PART of a COM MODIOUS RESIDENCE, conveniently arranged and handsomely fitted up, situate in the central part of the metropolis, a short distance from the chief public offices, and partiuularly well calculated for a Solicitor, Surveyor, or any Professional Gentleman. Particulars may be had of Mr. Reid, No. 170, Regent street. DEBATE ON THE REFORM BILL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS. The Order of the Day was than read, arid, upon the SPYAKER putting the question, " That I do sow leave the Chair," Sir H. HARDINGE was sure the result of this dis cussion would he productive of some g 0.4, as by it the attention of Government had been called to abuses which be was slti.fied would he remedied. The Marquis of WESTMEATH thought the present the most improper time for the introduction of such a Bill. (LEFT SPEAKING.) HOUSE OF COMMONS. SHOOTER'S-HILL, KENT. Delightful Residence, seated on a Lawn, with Pleasure Grounds and Extensive Walks, Capital Garden, Coach house, Stable, Lodge, and Meadow Land, in all about Eleven Acres. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, By Mr. REID, Son-in -Law and Successor to the late Mr. JOHN ROBINS, :(Of Warwick House, Regent-street,) At Garraway's Coffee-house, 'Change-alley, Cornhill, on THURSDAY, the 17th day of May, 1832, at Twelve o'clock, Unless previously disposed of by Private Contract, The Property of the late Edward Strachey, Esq. A Valuable LEASEHOLD ESTATE, he'd for a long term of years at a low Ground Rent, comprising A A SUBSTANTIALLY BUILT RESIDENCE, conveniently planned, and adapted for the accommodation of a Family of th. First Respectabi ity, or highly eligible for any Military or Naval Officer of Rank, from its con • tiguity to Woolwich, and being little more than seven miles from the Metropolis, on the rise of SHOOTER'S HILL, commanding extensive and interesting Views over the adjacent Country and the River Thames, with its enlivened and moving Scenery. The House is approached by a double carriage -drive, with folding gates and rustic lodge ; the entrance under a portico, to a neat hall, gentleman's morning room opening t 9 the conservatory and water-closet; capital bowed drawing room, commanding finely enriched, varied, and interesting scenery; noble lofty dining parlour, and two other rooms calculated for a library and breakfast parlour; and a stone staircase communicating with THE FIRST FLOOR, which consistts of six bed-chambers, a dressing-room, closet, and water-closet. Over the above there is a nursery and sleeping-room, and servants' rooms, with store-closet ; all requisite domestic offices, amply supplied with excellent water, lirder, bcc. Detached-la dairy, wash-house, brew-house, laundry, coach-houses, stables, cart-lodge, and farm-buildings, pig gery, and rick-yard. A capital productive walled kitchen garden, in high cultivation, well stocked and cropped with trained and standard trees in great perfection; an outer garden, and MEADOW LAND, IN ALL ABOUT ELEVEN ACRES, ornamented with numerous fine timber trees, thriving evergreens and shrubs, and a sheet of spring water. To be viewed by tickets only. Particulars may be bad on the Premises ;at the Red Lion, Shooter's-hill ; Castle, Elth im ; Mortar, Woolwich ; Green Man, Blackheath ; of Messrs. Kinderley and Denton, solicitors, Lincoln's inn New-square ; at Garraway's Coffee house ; and of Mr. Reid, No. 170, Regent-street, of whom tickets for view ing may be had. IMPORTANT CAUTION. THE RECUMBENT CHAIR is the in genious invention of R. DAWS, 17, Margaret street, Cavendish-square. The recommendations of it, in many Scientific Works, induced many unprincipled Up holsterers to sell an imitation of it, which, we find, does not afford the came extent of comfort to invalids, or as an or dinary Restin g Chair as the original. We, therefore, ad vise the obtaining of it of Robert Daws.”--Dr. Reece's Medical Annual, 1831. ROBERT DAWS respectfully states that no other prin ciple does, or cdn, admit of h tlf its variation or numb r of steady Positions, comfort, simplicity, strength, or elegance, and he will present one to any respectable person chewing the contrary. The same .Chair m a y b e had portable, also with wheels, by wt:ieb a person can move themselves in a mop, garden, or lawn..... May be had on hire. THE MARK LANE EXPRESS, Agricultural and Trading Newspaper, of the largest size, price only Sevenpence (published every Monday evening, in time for the Post), will give on Motin.ay. the 16th instant, (without additional charge), a SHEET DOUBLE the SIZE of the TIMES, containing a full Account of the Debate in the House of Lords on the Se cond Reading of the REFORM BILL. In it will he found—The fullest particulars of MON. DAY'S MARKET at MARK-LANE, and all the other Markets, Home and Foreign, of the Week ; MEAT MAR KETS and Reports of FAT and LEAN STOCK MAR KETS ; State of the WOOL TRADE, Home, Colonial, and Foreign, Current Prices, &c. ; ali important matters occurring in the Agricultural and Trading World ; a LIST of the principal FAIRS to take place every en suing Week : all Improvements, Patents, &c. ; Concise Statements of the Effects of New Decisions in Courts of Law, and the earliest Notice of Motions and Bills in Par liament affecting the interests of Landlords, Tenants, Ma nufacturers, &c. ; particular attention to all changes in the Laws, of moment to the Malteter and Retail Brewer, the Prices of Malt and Hops, Wine, Spirits, &c., and all that can constitute a desirable FAMILY NEWSPAPER, and Record of Facts, &c., for the information and guid ance of men of business. Orders received by the Publisher, W. Jenkinson, at the Office, 336, Strand, London, and by all Booksellers and Newsmen throughout the Empire. . . " The Mark Lane Express, a new Paper devoted to the agri cultural and commercial interests, as well as to general intel ligence and politics. It is well printed, and apparently well conducted, and promises to be a useful Newspaper to persons in trade."—Edinburgh Chronicle. " An excellent Weekly Paper, which should be in the posses sion of every Corn Merchant and General Trader."—Lancaster Herald. " A new agricultural paper, very appropriately named, and very well conducted." —Mechanics' Magazine. MINERAL SUCCEDANEUM FOR FILLING DE CAYED TEETH, without Heat or Pressure, and IN• CORRODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH, without Wires or other Ligatures. MONSIEUR MALLAN and SONS, Sur geon Dentists, No. 32, GREAT RUSSELL STREET, BLOOMSBURY, and 9, HALF-MOON STREET, PICCADILLY, grateful for the high and extensive patronage which has so eminently distinguished their professional exertions since their arrival in the British Metropolis, respectfully announce to their Friends and the Public in general, that they still continue to restore DE CAYED TEETH, with their celebrated MINERAL SUCCEDANEUAI, so universally recommended by the Faculty of London and Paris. The operation of Filling Teeth is performed in a few seconds, without the slightest pain, heat, or pressure. They also FASTEN LOOSE TEETH, in a manner singularly efficacious, and SUPPLY WHOLE or PARTIAL SETS of TEETH formed of the above INCORRODIBLE MINERAL, or of Natural Sub stances, without WIRE or other LIGATURES—guar-Po teed to answer every purpose for Articulating and Masti cating.—Charges as in Paris. The Faculty are respectfully invited to witness the suc cessful result of the Mineral Suceedaneum. INSOLVENT COURT-APRIL 2. Edward Winnall was opposed by Mr. WooD ROFFE, on behalf of J. Jones. It was alleged that he had made away with his property under the cover of a collusive sale to his daughter. Insolvent, who owned a porter-shop in Newport, Monmouthshire, and kept some saddle-horses for hire, was examined by Mr. Woodroffe, with the in tention of establishing the objections. Mr. WOODROFFE.—How many horses had you at the time of your arrest had none. What be came of them ?—I sold them before. When did you sell the last horse ?—lt was not a horse, it was a mare. (A laugh.) How many did you sell ? Three or four; I used not to keep more. Old mar,, how many horses had you at the rime of your surest ?—(Peevishly,)— It was no horse, it w as a mare, and she died. (Laughter.) The examination then proceeded, and some other evidence was adduced.—lnsolvent remanded for seven months. From the notice which Eirl Bahurst had given on a preceding evening, retative to the presentation of the Oxford petition, a notion had been erroneously entertained that the Chancellor of the University (Lord Grenville) in tended once more on entering the political arena for the sake of presenting the petition to the House, and it was added, of attending in his place during the second read ing of the Bill, and eve❑ throughout the discussions in the Committee. It would appear this erroneous impression had prevailed to some extent throughout the House itself, and there was a very numerous attendance of the r Lordships. The great age and infirmities of Lord Grenville, wilt his declaration that he had for ever abandoned every thing connected with po litical life, was not sufficient to prevent the expectation that his Lordship would be roused by his hostility to Re form to appear once more in that House in the debates of which fie had formerly borne a conspicuous part. Earl BATHURST rose and said, that in the absence of the Noble Chancellor of the University of Oxford, it became his duty to present the petition which that learned body had addressed to the House of Lords. When he reflected on the changes which his Ma jesty's Ministers were about to introduce into the Legislature, and consequently into all the institu tions of the country, he could have no hesitation in saying that he fully supported the prayer of the peti • lion. The Reform Bill, as it was called, was about to entirely disfranchise fifty-six boroughs, and to par tially distranchise twenty-two more, although these places had long possessed the pi iv lege of returning Members to the House of Commons, and had exercised that privilege with such signal advantage to the country. The petitioners stated, that they objected to these changes, because they deemed them thoroughly dangerous and fraught with evil to all the best interests of the country. The preamble and the body of the Bill were by no means con sistent ; the preamble merely stated that Parliament was prepared to extend the elective franchise to many of his Majesty's subjects who hitherto had not been possessed of that privilege ; but not one word did it say of depriving any man of the elective franchise which he had hitherto enjoyed. It was further to be complained of that these boroughs were to be disfranchised without assign ing any reason for the number that was to be disfranchised. Ministers called on the House to determine that a precise numb,r of places should be deprived of this privilege without giving any one reason why this number was fixed on. In addition to this, the petitioners stated that it appeared to them that the changes were calculated to create a spirit of revolt, and would be the fore runners of many evils. Persons hail argued, that by making the boroughs to be disfranchised so nume rous ; the question of Reform would be finally set tled, but the petitioners thought that the alteration of the whole representative system of a kingdom was too vast an undertaking to come within the grasp of any man, or set of men. The petitioners explained, that under the pro• posed changes a great variety of principles would come into play, beyond what Ministers anticipated or could contem plate, and the Bill would do any thing rather than settle the subject. The petitioners apprehended that the Bill would encourage a love of change without satisfying any man, and that it would foster a wild spirit of emulation beyond what it would be in the power of Parliament to sanction. The Bill would have the effect of disturbing the balance of power, which was the essence of the Consti tution, and how mysterious this effect would be he need not state to their Lordships. He believed that a House of Commons, purely deinocratical, would be en gaged in any thing rather than in correcting its own abuses. He had now done his duty in stating the objec tions which the petitioners hail to the Bill ; and be had accompanied that statement by obser vations of his own, which he thought calculated to support the views of the petitioners. Those who had signed it stated that they contemplated the changes intro duced by Ministers with sorrow and alarm. So averse were they to theßil I, that they reluctantly came from the sanctuary of academic life, and approached their Lordships in the hope that they would not give their sanction to the Bill, being convinced that their Lordships in so doing would compromise all the important interests of the country. Earl GREY said that be was little disposed at that moment to prematurely occupy the attention of the House, and still less was he disposed to throw imputations on the motives of those persons who had so reluctantly withdrawn themselves front the retirement of academic life in order to present this petition to their Lordship's House. He only thought it necessary, in answer to the statements of the peti tioner, and to the observations made by the Noble Earl in presenting it, that all the matter contained in one and the other would come under the discussion of their Lordships, when the proper time for discussion ar rived, which would be at the second reading of the Bili until that period arrived, he should refrain from entering into the subject, but in the mean time, he should merely, observe that it was some satisfaction to him to find that even in a peititon like the present, there was an acknowledgment that some sort of Reform was necessary. When the time arrived, he trusted he should be able to show by arguments that would be satisfactory even to the petitioners, that there would be no danger in entertaining the considera tion of the Bill, and that its provisions would be consistent with the safety of all the institutions in the kingdom. He could assure the Noble Earl that it was as much his intention to uphold and support those institutions as it could be the intention of the Noble Earl himself, or of those who had voted this petition. Until the proper period arrived, he should postpone any further observed , ns ou the subject, however he might be inclined to reply to some points in the petition. Mr. BEftsiwe and others from the Commons brought up the Marine Mutiny Bill and two private Bills. Petitions against Tithes were presented by Lerd Kixo and the Earl of FINGAL. In answer to the Duke of WELLINGTON, Lords MELBOURNE and PLUNKETT saw no reason Why the consideration of the Irish Juries Bill should be po st► The SPEAKER entered the House at a Quarter to Four o'clock, when the Deputy Usher of the Black Rod ap• peared at the Bar, and summoned the House to the House of Lords, to hear the royal assent given by commission to several Bills. The Speaker and several Members then left the House, and on their return read a list of the Bills to which the Royal Assent had been given, and for which see the Lords' Report. Mr. BERNAL presented a petition from Mr. Hairley, an owner of land in the New North-road, and other per sons, against the Bill for malting a new road near High bury-place, and praying that the period of thirty-one ye ire stated in the Bill might be altered to twelve years. Mr. BYNG brought up the report of the amendments on the Highbury-.road Committee. On the moticn that they he read a second time, 'Mr. HUME objected to several parts of the Bill as in. jurious to the property of persons in the line of road. He moved several amendments, among which were two to limit the period of the tolls to twelve years instead of thirty-one years, and that the trustees be prevented from erecting side tolls. Mr. BYNG hoped the House would agree to the Bill as it now stood, the Committee being unanimous, with the exception of his Hon. Colleague (Mr. Hume). Lord LOWTHER made a few observations, which were quite inaudible in the gallery. Mr. WILKS thought these parties would get much more by the Bill than the public ought to allow them to obtain.• He thought the House ought not to en courage these sort of speculation in roads.—(Hear, hear.) He thought there was something exceedingly suspicious in the statement of 12,0001. being expended in the formation of a road of only a mile and a quarter in length. The House, after some further observations from Mr. HUME, divided, when there appeared— For the Original Amendments 9 Against them Majority 47 The House again divided upon another amendment, re• lative to the period to which the Act should extend, when there appeared— F . oi the Amendment 42 Against it l5 Majority -27 The Bill, with the amendments, was ordered to be en gi ossed. Mr. BYNG presented three petitions against the Bir mingham Railway Bill. Colonel DAVIES rose, pursuant to notice, to move for a Select Committee, to inquire how far the glove trade of the United Kingdom was injured by the introduction of smuggled goods, and concerning the best means of affording protection to the trade. He rose upon the present occasion with extreme reluctance, when he recollected the lengthy debate upon the subject which had al ready taken place ; but when he recollected what had been done oa the motion for granting an inquiry on the silk trade, he could not but call the attention of the Howie to a few circumstances connected with that debate. He had heard his Right Hon. Friend's speech on that occasion with great satisfaction, because every word he uttered, every argument he used, and every position he took, furnished him (Colonel Davies) with the strongest arguments in support of the claims he espoused, and against the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. P. Thompson). The Right Hon. Gentleman had used arguments to prove what he asserted at the beginning of his speech, viz. that there was no occasion for inquiry as to the state of the silk trade, and yet he concluded by conceding that inquiry, while, as to the glove trade, he rea dily admitted, that distress certainly existed, and yet refus e d an inquire into the beat means of affording protection to the trade. On the silk question th. Right Heinourible Member referred to his speech in 1626 —a speech which he (Col. Davies) should never forget— and made use of precisely the same arguments with those made use of by Ain-Huskies:on ; but then there was this difference,...that the Right Hon. Gentleman granted that nquiry which Mr. Htiskisson, upon the came facts, refused. An Hon. Member on a former occasion had stated there .sere not a hundred dozen pairs of gloves smuggled nto this country in the course of the year, but said that before the importation of foreign gloves became legal a great deal of smuggling was carried on, Now it was evident, that if the smuggling existed be fare the importation became legal, the facilities of smug gling were much greater since. One house in this metropolis within the last few weeks has been offered to one lot three thousand dozen of pairs of French smug Bled gloves, and this he (Colonel Davies) was ready to prove before a Committee. Another fact was, that the greater part of Gentleman's gloves came from France packed in silver paper. The silver piper kept them from beating, and the smuggler packed them and silver paper, knowing that it might be a considerable time before be was able to get his goods de livered. Also, there was another trick in the trade, which was exceeding common, and that was in packing 14 OS 15 pieces together to thedoz.tn. Gentlemen's gloves were Pressed tightly together, being very thin, were sent over as ladies' gloves. These were all tricks which were daily practised, and which the Gallont Officer prepared to prove without any difficulty in delay. He had no doubt that if this subject was investigated, the same sort of disclosures would take place as regarded the smuggling of gloves, which have come to light respecting the; smuggling of spiri, It has been said by an Hon. Member that gloves couWe made as cheap in this country as on the Continent, but how that could be he (Colonel Davis) was totally at a loss to understand, because he had been assured, on what lie conceived to be the best authority, that the very best gloves could not he made here for less than eight shillings and sixpence a dozen pair, whereas the best Grenoble could be made lot 4s. 61. Therefore, without a protecting duty it was utterly impossible that the English glove manufac turer could compete with the foreign glove manufacturer. Let his Majesty's Government show, if they could, that there were no means of remedying the distress; anti if they showed that, be would be satisfied that no blame ought to be attached to them. At the same time, if what was demanded was deemed reasonable, they ought to con sider it. The people whose cause he represented were most loyal, and had never joined in any of the disturd ances hick had prevailed in many parts of the country.— He concluded by moving ;hat a Select Committee be ap pointed to inquire how far the clove trade had been in jured by the introduction of smuggled goods, and to recom mend some remedial measure. Mr. R. GORDON secouded the motion. He could assure the House that be was personally acquainted with the distress which existed in the glove trade, and he sub mitted that it was the duty of the House to appoint a Com ntittee to inquire into the cause of that distress. Mr. I'. THOMPSON trusted that it was not neces sary for him to urge the same objections to the appointment of a Committee as he bad urged upon a former occasion. He had not heard from the Hon. and Gallant Officer one single reason, nor one single argument why the Committee should be granted. The Hun. and Gallant Officer had stated that he (Mr. P. T.) had denied the existence of any distress in the Silk Trade, and that there was, undoubtedly, one ground for the appointment of a Committee, What he did state was, in fact, quite the reverse. He admitted the existence of distres., and although he did not concur in the appointment of a Committee upon the grounds then urged, yet he concurred in it, upon special grounds, such as the amount of duty, and the extensive smuggling that was t en carrying on in silk. The present case was wholly distinct from that of the Silk Committee. In this case there were no special circumstances, and no advantage would be gained by the appointment of a Committee, but, on the contrary, it would be productive of much inconveni ence of the trade.—(Hear.) He admitted that the might be considerable distress in that trade, but he be- Hove(' it was n..t to such an extent as had been stated—(Hear, hear)—in proof of which opinion he know that the number of manufacturers in Yeovil had considerably increased within these last four year-. The Hon. and Gallant Officer hail taken considerable pains to obtain information, and he (Mr. P. Thomson) wis ed that he bad more thoroughly sifted the sources of that information, and the bearings of it, which would have enabled him to arrive at a different conclusion than he done ; for instanee, the Honourable and Gallant Officer hid stated that 1,100,000 skins werenow - in wa.ebouse, and he argued from that circumstance that there was less work, and that lees gloves had been made to that amount during the year 1831. Now if the Honourable and Gallant Officer had enquired what number of skins were in warehouse in 1830 or 1829, be would have found that it was always customary to keep a large stock on hand in warehouse, to be used when the glove season came on. (LEFT SiI:AXING.) IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, Ar.atr. Q. (Continued from our Second Edition of yesterday.) On the motion of Lord GEORGE SOMERSET the Bridge water and Taunton Canal Bill (with amendments) was read a third time. Mr. HUME moved for and obtained leave to bring in a Bill to amend and render more effectual the Acts of the 23d of George 11., and the 19th of George 111., for the more speedy recovery of small debts in the Tower Hamlets. Mr. Alderman THOMPSON obtained leave to bring in a Bill to alter, enlarge, and amend, the Acts for making and maintaining the St. Katharine Docks. Mr. LYTTLETON presented three petitions from persons concerned in turnpike roads, praying to be heard by themselves or counsel against the Birmingham and London Rail-road Bill. On the motion of Mr. E. BALL, the Bill for Lighting with Gas, Watching and Improving the Borouch of %Vele, in the county of Somerset, was read a third time and passed. On the motion of Mr. Alderman Woon, Josiah Smith's Divorce Bill was read a third time. Sir H. WILLIAMSON presented a petition from cer tain parties against the Hartlepool Railway Bill.—Re fared to the Committee. On the motion of Mr. S. RICE, wbelitated that it was desirable that the clauses should be well considered, the Gravesend Pier Bill was postponed until Thursday. STAMP DUTY ON NEWSPAPERS. Mr. STRUTT presented a petition from Macclesfield, most numerously and respectably signed, praying for a repeal of all taxes on knowledge communicated through the medium of the Press. They complained must parti cularly of the taxes o❑ the provincial Press, as it created a monopoly in the hands of a few individuals, wh• were thereby enabled to suppress any knowledge they chose to withhold. He trusted his Mijesty's Ministers would spee dily take the subject into their serious consideration, with a view to reduce or abolish altogether those taxes. As his Hon. Friend the Member for St. Ives intended shortly to bring the subject before the House, he would not trespass further than to move that the petition be printed...—.or dered. Sir C. COOTE presented a petition from the parish of Clognona, in the Queen's County, praying for an aboli tion of tithes. The Ordnance Department Bill was then read a third time and partied. On the motion of Sir J. GRAHAM, the Marine Mutiny Bill was read a third time. The order of the day for the third reading of the Malt Drawback Bill was then read. MUTINY BILL. On the motion for the Order of the Day for the Com mittee on the Mutiny Bill being read, Sir H. HARDINGE rose to protest against the present system of commutation of pensions, and he spoke in behalf of 80,000 old soldiers. During the time he was in the War-office, he never consented to allow a pensioner but one to sell his pension ; whereas in 1831 and 1832, pen sioners were allowed to sell out at four years' purchase, by which it now happened that there were 5,000 soldiers left destitute. The Right Hon. and Gallant Gentleman then entered into a history of the War-office, from the days of Mr. Windham until his own time, when regulations were introduced which the Right Hon. Gentleman eulogized in a warm manner. From the Right Hon. Gentleman's statement, appeared that en his accession to office there were not less than $3,000 pensioners on the list ; but that, owiag to his extraordinary seal, the number was re duced suns 3,000, with a ao distant prospect of a great Sir J. HOBHOUSE said that if; upon inquiry, the War-office should think a change its the 13104 of commu tation was desirable, it should be adopted. The House then went into Committee. Mr. HUNT complained that on a former occasion, wheel he had intimated his intention of moving the omission of the clause relating to flogging, he had been told by the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireland, by w Right Hon. Gen tleman opposite, and by the then Chairman (Mr. Pon sonby), that no such words were in the Bill. He had found, however, that the 24th clause enacted that it should lie lawful for general courts-martial, by their sentence, to in flict imprisonment and corpora' punishment, not extending to life. He had thus been prevented From making his motion by the declaration he hail referred to, and by the slovenly manner in which the clauses were read. He wished them to be read more distinctly, and that lie might have an opportunity of movin a that the words respecting corporal punishment be stru c k out. Mr. S. RICE believed he was the person responsible for the declaration referred to. He had not intended to mis -1,-ad the Hon. Member. He had thought the words were not in the Bill. Mr. PONSONBY denied he had stated that the words were not in the Mutiny Act. Mr. HUNT denied he had said he did. Whit he said was, that the Chairman did not contradict those who said so, and did not examine the Bill. Mr. PONSONBY appealed to the House whether the Hon. Member slid not charee him, in cwntnnn with two Right Hon. Gentlemen, with Asserting that the words were not in the act --(Hear, hear.) Mr. HUNT observed, that the law prevented any person under twenty-one years of age to serve on a jury; and he thought that a similar regulation should he adopted with respect to individuals required to serve on courts-martial. The clause was then agreed to. . . On the next clause, for giving to courts-martial the right of sentencing delinquents to imprisonment, solitary or otherwise, and to "corporal punishments not extending to life or limb," punishments l‘ H Uri HUNT o r t os e e, x t a e nd iad i m o g o v ed t 0 , that ife t o h r e w i, co o rds " b,,,8 hoi corporal be omitted. He had formerly moved for a return of the number of corporal punishments inflicted in the course of the year, when he proposed his motion ; but sea returns had been refused. He would, however,' brine the subject before the House. Sir J. BYNG contended, that it wa necessary to to courts-martial the power of which the Hon. M..mber wished to deprive them. The Hon. Me er wasewirely wrong when he supposed that punishen was privately inflicted. Even when the soldier recei • but one lash the punishment was noted down. Ever half-year each of the regiments of the line was inspected Ile defaulters book was then called for by the err. g officer; and by examining it he at once became segue inted with the nature of the offence and the amount of puenishment. The system of punishment had of late years been most lenient. He therefore should oppose the amendment. Mr. HUNIE did not mean to accuse lie officers of the British army with inhumanity. He believed that they did not award punishment whenever they could avoid it. He thought, however, that there should annually be laid before the House an account of the number of individuals punished by the sentences of courts-martial. Colonel SIBTHORP opposed flue amendment, as a most indecent and indelicate interference with tke British army, which, he averred, was the admiration of the world, and he hoped would always be the terror of the enemies of England. Sir J. HOBHOUSE had not changed his opinion on this subject; and, if it were in his po p w a e b r i , is he e s p h i o e u ie ld n, lik a e nt to try the experiment of gover N ni . ng u t a h rd e j a a r g r e n ) y w w i i t t ii i ii r t es co p r e e ct or at l i punishment. But the H n. Member for Prest. , n oug • know that the framing of the Mutiny MA was not wot k of the Secretary at War. Of late years eorpo punishments were greatly reduced. This Ltd, in parts ' bp"arntlyeffbvgy effected d e l'exTeetlhl:stitg":lcailio.nts of the Right Hon regenimtleenmtaanl •o•tta-martial. • Witk tarot te t at meta