The Sun. — London, England, 1801-12-14 00:00:00

was a forgery in the case : for instance, ifa bill put-1. ported to he drawn on him, by a Grocer at Wake field or at York, or any other part of England, by a man he never saw or corresponded with, it would then be considered by the Jury that it was highly improbable he was the acceptor ; but there was no thing of that kind, here, all probabilities were with the acceptance : for the parties had had large-deal ings together, and the Defendand had, over and over _ again, accepted bills ,for BowSer. Whether all this proof would be necessary, he could not tell, f o r the defence might still be abandoned ; bat con ceiving by the silence of his. Learned Friend, who was of Counsel for the Defendant, that this de fence was to be set up; he should proceed to the proof , he had opened to, the jury. Mr. PARK said, he 'did not chuse to. into:rupt Mr. ERSKINE in his opening to the jury, but the defence was, that this acceptance was a forgery. Mr.'ERSKINE then proceeded to call ,witnesses in .Apport of the Plaintiffs' case. Thomas Hatt said, I am acquainted with the 11%nd-writing of the Defendant.---Looking at the 1011 and the acceptance to it, he said, I have no doubt of its being the hand-writing of the De fendant. I have kid an opportunity of seeing. his hand-writing- I was his Clerk for near two years ; during these two years I had - very frequent oppor_ . tunities of 'seeing him write ; and having had these opportunities, .and having inspeeted this acceptance ; I have no doubt that it is his hand-writing. I know Mr. Bowser the drawer. I know there was a connection between him and the Defendant in the way of bills. Bower was in the. habit of draw ing bills on the Defendant, and .he of accepting On his crossexamination by Mr. PARK, the _Witness said--It is about five years since I lived with the Defendant; I have not been much in the • habit of visiting the Defendant since. I have called there, but not to have seen much of his hand-: writing since that 'time. I am now 2I years of age. I was between 15' and 16 left the service of the Defendant. I have,. 'no-doubt this ) acceptance is the.hand 7 writing of the4fendant. - Thomas Hill.• I know the Defendant, and have known him for—twelve years. I ihave often had: - transaelions With hbn in business, in cOns-eqUence of-which I have 1,,,a opportunities, frequently, of, sTeing him write. - I understand he has been, fre_ quently, in the habit of -putting his name to bills. From the knowledge I have, of the handwriting of the' Defendant, I _believe this acceptance is his handwriting. The /signature =pcissesses all that identity which' clistinguiShes one rnan'S writing from another. Supposing I had not heard any thing- ; of this bill, and it was presented to me, I should havehad no difficulty in discounting this bill. I have discounted bills drswn by the Defendant on 'Bowser. On his cross-examination by Mr. COMYNS, he said, this acceptance posseses that which, in my opinion, constitutes the charaCter of the Defen_ dent's hand-writing. He added many other par ticulars on this subjeet, but this is the substance of his evidence. There was no doubt of the perfea resneaability of this Gentleman. James Ward. I am acquainted with the hand writing of the Defendant, Mr. Winder. I have known him, and have transatied business with him, thr six years or more, I think ; in that period, I have had frequent opportunities of seeing him write. I have looked at" this acceptance, I believe it to be the hand-writing of the Defendant. On his cross-examination by Mr. PARK, this Gentleman said, he had seen the Defendant write three or four times, and had received letters from him and transacted business with him afterwinds in consequence of the correspondence, of such letters. He added, that he had no doubt in the world, this accceptance was the hand-writing of the Defen. dant. Thomas Hornsey underwent a very long exami nation, the substance of which was, that he had formerly lived clerk with the Defendant ; that the acceptance in piestion seemed like the hand writing of the Defendant ; but it was not, his .re gular mode of acceptance. He could not_ say. it W a, the hand-writing of the Defendant. That the NVii:.ess' had seen the Defendant sineefhe was. sub p4naed as a WitnesS for the Plaintiff. He had con ,t4:ith hint; not at hiS house , but at the , Cityirti in Bow Lane ; they ate and drank together. They had a little conversation - on this cause. He asked the Witness, " who lie , carne for ?" At the first sight of this bill, he thought. the acceptance Was the hand-writing of the_ Defendant, but ,when he went home he thought that ,one pan's hand writing ~ - V as like another ; but he could not swear that this was the hand-writing , of .the Defendant. There Were five or six 'people with hiM 'at the Crown. The Defendant was 'there; y r. Awood, Mr. Jackson, and Mr. Locket, but he did not know the names of the others. After some further ac.: count of this matter- at the tavern, the question was put to him, " Whether he believed the accep tance to be of _the hand-Writihg of the Defendant ? he said; he could not swear it,was the hand-writing of the Defendant." This being no 'answer, be cause he was asked, as to his belief,' and , not his knowledge, the question was repeated to him at least a duzeu times without effed, he taking time to answer. - _Mr. ERSKiNE asked him, " Upon your solemn oath, as you shall answer before God cm the Day of Judgment, do you believe that' to be the hand-writing of the Defendant ?" Mr., Justice LE BLANC desired him to take time and to answer fairly ; he could not be so stupid as not to know he was not asked whether it was the hand-writing of the Defendant, for that nobody . could tell who did not see him.write it ; but what he believed—whether it was or was not the hand writing of the Defendant. At the same time the Learned Judge said, that if after this - 'he prevaricat ed, lie should know how to deal with him. At last he said he believed it was the Defendant's writing. Henry Stratton. " 1 - know. The Defendant Winder ; I have frequently transaded buiiness with him, and have frequently seen him write.— I have had Bills drawn by him, and which I have band-riti - n - 8 7; John Preston Neal said, he had paid Bills drawn on their House by the Defendant, by which he became acquainted with his hand-writing. He be_ believed this to be ate hand-writing, of the De fendant. Andrew Leith gave evidence to the same effe& - Mr. ERSKINE said, that the Defendant having thought fit to say. this 'aCceptance was the 'forgery of Bowser, he would call Mr. Bowser as a Witness, that his . Learned Friend Mr. P:.112.K, who was of Counsel for the Defendant, might cross-examine.him as much as he pleased. Bowser." I drew this Bill on the, De fendant He accepted it in my preSence, and at the same time I cancelled another' Bill to the same amount. I tore it in -pieces, and. I flung the frag ment ofit into the fire-place before he accepted this Bill. I have got my bill-book here ; I flung the fragments- of the other Bill into the Defendant's fire:}slace - before him. I certainly should know that Bill if the. pieces had been taken up and put together again. There is a corresponding entry to these Bills in my book. The Defendant' had ac cepted Bills drawn by Me, on him many times be fore. It is impossible for me to. say how many Bills the Defendant has accepted of mine, fifty per haps. - Not only is this acceptance the hand writing of the Defendant, done in my presence, but it was a voluntary"aa of his ; I indorsed it for a full consideration, to Messrs. -Schooling, LaW rence, and Company, who are the Plaintiffs in this Cause.", He underwent a long cross-examination by Mr. PARK, in, the course of which he said, that he. be, lieved the Defendant's acceptance for him, and in advance, amounted to between i'sOol. and ,zoool. probably i 6001..: That he never• was a bankrupt, but that a Deed of-CoMposition from him to his Creditors had been dra‘vn ,so long ago as August last, but not yet executed. He believed, however, even now, it will - be executed by the Creditors at large. He believed' the , time the Defendant ac •cepted • the Bill was ,the latter end of May or, the beginning of June. He knew a person of the name ofAwagd. He admitted he had received notice to produce a letter, said to have been sent to him from the Defendant' by the hand of Mr. AWoOd, .who was the Defendant's Clerk about the latter end of April, last, but he had never received any such letter. \:Then'-the Bill in question was accepted by the Defendant, the Witness indorsed it over,to the Plaintiffs in this Aaion for ,a valuable consider ation : copper to the amount of about 451. or 461. had been delivered to the Plaintiffs by him, but not under,any engagement whatever to pay this Bill instead of the Defendant. He added Other ciicum stances, but this is the substance 'of ,his evidence. Thomas Tate, Clerk to a l•lotary, proved that he presented the Bill in question to the Defendant for payment. His answer was, " that he would not pay it." William Bannister had often seen the Defendant write. He believed the acceptance to ire of the Defendant's hand-writing. , Richard Herringshaw gavesevidcnce to the like effea. There was no attack whatever made upon the eharaeter of either of the Witnesses for the Plaintiffs, except that of Bowser ; they were all admitted to be respeaable persons. Here the Bill of Exchange was read "It is dated 18th May, 18ot. Signed. P. J. Bowser, at three months after date payable to the order of , the drawer 3661. 17s. 4d. value delivered in pig iron, diretted to Mr. Thomas Winder, Iron-founder, Lambeth, accepted by T. Winder, and indOrsed by Bowser.''—Here the Case f o r the Plaintiffs ended. Mr. PARK, on behalf of the Defendant, admitted the great importance of this' Case. to the _Defend_ ant, as it involved his cha,ratler in the deepest manner, to Bnwser, as it must affect his life if the defence was made out; and_to the Public also who had an interest in the deteaion of guilt, as well .as the exposure of iniquity. If Bowser was believed, . the Defendant could have no. Case, and ,he must be one of the greatest scoundrels upon earth, ,becausey in. that' Case he must be guil ty of .the inflatious . :ininiorality of charging a fel low creature fidsely With an offence that might take away hislife; for the base purpose-of shunning .the performance of his own engagement; but he trusted,' that heavy'as the ,Case appeared bear upon him at ,present, the Jury would-be 'of Opinion, when they had heard the whole of the evidence, _that . this acceptance was not the Defendant's hand-writing, - but was tie wicked a& of Bowser, on whOse credit the Learned Gentleman, made some observations, to shew . why the *Jury should .not believe him. As to the other Witnesses for the Plaintiffs; the an_ . swer to ,their testimony was, that they must be mistaken,. for that it would appear by the evidence of those 'who saw the Defendant write every day, that they verily believed this acceptance.was not of the hand-writing of the Defendant. Richard, Jackson, Clerk to the Defendant, said, he had seen the Defendant write a thousand ,times. He was 'present when there was a conversation be tween Mr. Schooling one of the Plaintiffs, and the Defendant on' the subjeel of this Bill., He went there for the express purpose of seeing whether the acceptance of the Bill in queition was the hand writing of the Defendant. It was in the Counting house of Mr. Schooling. On that Occasion Mr. Winder stated that it was not his hand-writing. The Witness also expressed the same sentiment.— Mr. Schooling pressed very hard that Mr. Winder would say positively whether it was or .not, but Mr. Winder did not give an immediate answer.— There wits a great deal of conversation afterwards about Mr. RiwSer, but Mr. Winder did not give any furtlititv-finSWei- about the acceptance. Mr. Schoolinkrffitide observations upon the Bill : he said . he thought it was not like Mr. Winder's acceptance--:thafhe hattl apprehensions of that kind before. He said it was unlike Mr. Winder's ac ceptance, and he pointed out where it was unlike. —The Witness afterwards called on Mr. Schooling, to see the Bill again, but it was gone into the hands of the Attorney, to bring an Adion upon it against Mr. Winder. The Witness looked at the Bill, he SIR, nvi said it was very different, in many.iarticulars, from the Acceptance of the Defendant. He should not have accepted it . as the hand-writing of the Defen dant, if offered to him. - Charles Awood, Clerk to the Defendant, swore, positively, that he delivered the Letter alluded to Mr. Bowser, at his brother's house by the Royal Exchange. Mr. BoWser, he was sure, read it, for he gave a verbal answer to it, which the Witness wished to state, but the Rules of Evidence would not allow it.--The - Witness had been Clerk to the Defendant eight or nine years, dined with him daily, .knew his hand-writing well, indorsed Bills by his authority, but never accepted any for him. Looked at the Acceptance in question, and said it was so. extremely different front every thing he ever saw of. the hand l rriting of the Defendant, that he realty and firmly, believed it was not his writing. John,Taylot, Clerk to a Merchant in 'Thames street,. gave an account of the'Bill being brought to their house fmm the house of the Plaintiffs, to learn whether it was the ACceptance of . the Defen dant or not. The Witness thought it differed from the usual mode of Mr. Winder's P Accep . tance in some degree, "and, that he 'could not nor, would positively swear. that it. was his hand-writing. That was ail that past at that time. Having looked at the Ac ceptance•then, and,looking at it now, he said it - was not the usual mode of Mr. Winder's Acceptance. — He did not scarcely. believe it to be his. He had known the Defendant six or seven years,, and had seen him write frequently— He scarcely believed it to be the Defendant's hand-writing. He said there was a stiffness in some of the letters which did not usually appear ill his hand. Mr. Locket, a Brandy Merchant, had known the handwriting of the Defendant for eight or nine years, having -be e n, in the habit of seeing him write; said he had never seen .the ,Bill before. Looked at it, and said it Is . nott, the usual mode of his as„ cepiance. He,did not ihink:it was ,If offered' to him, as the' Acceptance oflYlr. , Winder, ,he did' not think he should have-taken it. It then appeared,' that all ilie . Witnesse, except the two last, had been with the Defendant at the Crown in Bow-lane, and that the Witness'Hornsey Was there with them ; that they ate and drank there, and that Mr. Winder paid the Bill, &e. Mr. ERSKI NE wade an able reply. Mr. justice Lu,Bt„Artc. sulmned up the Evidence, anti pointed out the material points of the Case to the attention of the jury, who, very soon aftei wards, found a verdiA for The ,Plaintiffs, Damages 3741. 7s. 6d. being the amount a the Bill, With Interest. BURTON V. DAY. 'The P,laintifF is: the, Gardner .of Mr. Smith, a Quaker,_ and MeaTruan, WalWorth ; the Defen_ . dant,.'is an Officer in the Volunteer Corps at that place. - The Anion was brought by the Plaintik sup ported by - his Master, against the Defendant, for assaulting him on the night of the loth of Olober last, when there was ,a General Illumination _on account of the news of the Preliminaries of Peace, The assault was alledged to.have been committed by the Defendant, first by firing by the side of the Plaintiff's_ face close to his cheek, and afterwards knocking him down with the but,end of his musket while he was standing by, together with other ser vants of Mr. Smith, to proteE the House of their Master; which, as a Quaker, Mr. Smith declined to illuminate. Several Witnesses who stood by all the time, and who said, they had no ,connedion with the parties, swore they saw this, and that. it was not provoked on the part of the Plaintiff. On - the part. of the, Defendant several Officers of the Corps swore, that a person of the name of Cook had fired close by the Plaintiff before the De, fendant came up, and that the 'Plaintiff, by, way of challenge to the whole Corps, said ". he would be damned if he would not knock down any one that would fire-by him again;"- upon which the Defend ant borrowed the musket of Look, loaded it, and fired; and then turned round to the Plaintiff, and asked Now what will.you do ?" That the Plaintiff then projeaed himself forward,and clinched his gist in a posture to strike ;the Defendant, upon which the Defendant struck the-Plaintiff with his musket. This !educed tht,whole , case to a single point, whether the Defendant or the Plaintiff committed the first assault, and that, from the contrariety of the evidence, became a pure question of credit to the Witnesses. , After a very long- trial, the Jury withdrew and remained out of Court for upwards of at hour, and brought, in their Verdi& for the Defendant. The opinion entertained relative to the Gout being incapable of a perfea cure, is fully refUted in the Case of the respeCiable Writer of the following letter, who, since cured in 779 7, had no return whatever of his Disorders. To pr. Q4,DNER, Long-Acre. I have been afflieted with the Gout and Rheuma tism for twenty, years, to such a degree, that my limbs and joints, were swelled to double their na tural size, and often for a month together I was un able to help myself to food, orlift my hand to my head: I had the advice of three physicians, but found no benefit, until I was advised to use your _Pills, which gave me instant case, and in a few weeks wrought an effeetual cure. I believe this Medicine will cure the most inveterate Gout or Rheumatism in the world, without giving pain ; and you have tree liberty to publish this 'in all the Papers, as I t 9hall think it a duty I owe the Public, to satisfy.apy n persce who wishes to be informed of pareicularS. , ..1)(flta 's, JOHN PURSER, Feb. z3,"1797. .(Keeps) Talbot Inn, Whitechapet. This universal Medicine removes the Gout, with all other impurities of the Fluids in a safe and gen_ tle way ; also Worms, of the most uncommon spe cks, from one to forty feet long—These Vegeta. ble Pills are.sold at the Dodoes house, Long-Acre, London; and by Venders in the United Kingdom, at 2 is. ios. l Eid. ss. and zs. 3d. a Box, duty included. T.ONI)UN : Printed by BUCHANAN WMILLAN, (of Bow-Street, Covent-Garden);' and Published by WIILT.aSt ARMIGER SCRIPPS, (of Horce,terry-road, Westminster); At the- SUbt.OFFI L C g ) NO. 132, Strand; where iltivertiwnettr; 04.ers for the Paper, Letters for the Ediacr, &c. (post paid, must be addressed. GRAVEErNI), DEC. 11. Passed by—the New Blossom, WoodtOrd, from Calai; ; Tyson, Sims, frdin .Petersburgh Cuithells, Alicant, Jacoba Christiana, Boyson, from Cain. Sailed—the Baibadoes Planter, Carter, for. Barbadoc ; Catherine G reen,.Steel,, and Undaunted, Mason, for J amaica; Somerser, Falvey, fpr Lisbon ; Alexa:.dcr, -De Haan, 0 1-lambro' ; Diana, Boyson, for Rotterdam ; and the KoliiP' burg, —, for Nor Way, DIED. On.Mo9day last, at Sandwich, Mrs. Rainier, wife of I ) Rainier, Esq. brother to.the Admiral of that name. PRICE 0 STOCKS, SITU Rank Stock Navy 5 per Cent. shut s,per Cent. 1797, 98a rish 5 per Cent. 4 per Cent. Con. 13411 per Cent. Red. 3 per Cent. Con. shut Ditto Scrip Bank Long A nn. 11-16 Ditto Short Ann,. Ditto Scrip RDA Y. India Stock Excheq. 6s. 3s. prenf . Fundable ditto prem. .New S. S. Stock 3 per Cent. 175 t, • Oinniunt I flyer. 3 - per Cent. Ditto Ann. • Bank for Account India for Account Consols for Open. 68-ii TO BE SOLD, CAPITAL - HUNTERS,. all equal to Siva° 1.3 Stone; the . Property of a Gentleman, 'who has nu fet' Cher occasion tbr them. Apply at the White Lion Inn, Stratford-on-Avon, w herL: the prices are left. • MARRIAGE AND SOCIAL HAPPINESS. • HOWMany Men to ail appearance in the prim 1 1 . of life,. who have not yet arrive a at the .age of 25 yeal s are rendered miserable to themselves and useless to,the grei cliahi of society, which they have either, brought -On Wile , selves, or by the force of bad example, _ are liven .up to Sedret Vice ; the consequence is, that their 'mind as well as body isdebilitated; to those.the Nervous Cordial is recollv mended, and for which Dr. ,Brocium obtained His Majesty's Royal Letters leate:rf ; it will proted them from the Infiv m.ities of old age and wretched dissolution. Amidst the al. 0 ", nizing.refleaiop of conscious guilt, how many are thew. 0 ; .-both Sexesohat aredeterred from entering into a niarneo state, by infirmities which delicacy forbids them to disclose and those are not a few; Who being already married,. are reo-, dered Miserable for want ofthose tender pleasures of mutua l love, without which happiness this state is at teast very plc" cartons. - The vice above alluded to, causes in women we' gukrities, pains inthe back and chest, hysterics, spasins; kiss of appetite, .Ac: In'inen, it causes, imbecility, langtiof , relaxation, nervous complaints, debility; anx i ety, an d alont; train of melancholy disorders ; whether from taking tnercurY to excess, orowing to an abominable vice,. or.. other causes ; it removes all disorders in the kidneys and bladder, pains iO the back and head, horrid thoughts, _rightful dreams, - dim ness palpitation Of - the heart, dorsal coPstimption, trembling of the hands from hard drinking, and diseases aris ing from excess of any kindcand wi 11,i nVig9rati; and strengthc o the-constitution' of weak,':Mckly, and aged persons. TIW Nervous - Corciial.stands unrivalled, as it h as Iwyen.analyzed the first Professors. and- Medical Men Europe can produce , andmay be relied on in giving immediate relief and certail t ease 'inmost stages - of Nervous Complaints. This exaltA Medicine has been pro:Atte - live of general good, and many re stored to the blessings -, of health from the gates of death, bY this inestimable 'preparation, is the highest elogium whrcb - cauld ,possibly be paid .to..Dr..Brodurn, - and is, indeed, lilt .boast and reward,, Letters, stating,Patients' Cases, with the Dodoes usual fee of a guinea , will he stridiy attended to. I3ROOUM's GUIDE TO OLI) AGE, or Advice to both 'Sexes, to obtain a radical and permanent cure for those secret Infirmities of Nature which delicacy often thrbiclS to disclose even to their relatives; with a Treatise 9n hey Male Diseases, Nervons, Hypochondriac, and Consumpti4 Complaints. To which is adckd, Advice to Bath and Hot' well Bathers, &c. 'lt is particularly recommended to Sea' faring Men. A 22Sr Bottle contains equal to five small ones. - It will be neeesSary the'Dodor should see such patients o 5 are afilidedwith deafness or loss of sight, or sendt heir eases , by letter or parcel, to the DoCtor (post-or carriage -paid), wit! , his usual fee. To those Ladies and Gentignien bordering on the Stale?, Matrimony, the : Detclor,woulti particularly-- reeolnivwed - Botanical Syrup (prior to their appearance bi , . e tie altar of HYmen), who =ln the smallest degree apprein:nstve •of tlt ' System not being entirely sound, or sui , jeet to relaxations 0 , the Solids. . • The Botanical Syrup and Nervous Cordiat to be had at t 1 Doelor!s. House - , No. 9,- AlbiOn 7 street (seven Doors frail th e Leverian Museum), Bl4ckfriars-bridge, in Bottles of il. us. 6d. and ss. 6d. (duty included); and of E. NewberYt corner of St. Paul's Church-yard; Jeboult and Co. (late con), No. 150, Oxford-street; Binding's- Medicine .Ware' house; No. 76, Oxtbrd-street ; Cockell, No. z 29, Strand; Pock; Hull ; Remnant, Hambro' ; 'Baxter, ,Ediuburgit Brown, Tolzey, BriSteil ; Read,,Vine-street, Bristol ; M‘Vo nald, Glasgow ; Chalmers, Aberdeen; Tutt, and.. Bon) toot Royal Exchange; ';'ollins, Salisbury; Spilsbury:and Co. Mary -street, Dublin ; likewise, W. Magee,. Belfast ' and M Davis, Cork, Ireland; and in the country:- of alLPrinterst Booksellers, and Venders of Medicines in the dirge K ingdows • To THOMAS TAYLOR, Esq. Dear Sir, , No. 9, New,.Bridge-Stfeet;tondoll• T. F EEL it a Duty incumbeot upon me, t o i n forol you of :the very great and: extraordinary Cure I have re,: ceiVed from your invaluable Medicine' L IKE 's l'ATE;•r` PILLS. • About two years ago, I was attacked with a V EN ER EA l ' DISQRDER; which 1 treated rather slightly for some tisv : ', but the Disease at length spreading alt overmy - body, : I W 3 c " obliged to apply to the most eminent of the - Faculty, b u r. their assistance alibided .only temporary rebel: 1 WO" through various Courses' of SalivatiOn, sad lion: being ra ttic of a corpulent. habit, was reduced. to 'a mere 'skeleton. I . lid Ulcers that'spread all •over. my Limbs rendered me a cool' plete Object, so that my Ftiends . despaired of my reco•L'r.':' When brought to this situation, I -considered death as "inev , , table, but a 'relation of mine commenting upon the r 1 1 0; Cases in which your Pilfs - had succeeded, I was induced ti try a Box of them, .which I thought rather relieved me, 11t i • by persevering for two or three months, and following Yo u direttions, I experienced the most unaccountable relaNatiq ; from pain, the sores gradually subsiding ; I am now; 03 0 7 God,. perfectly reeovered, and walking out daily don . ll l not, but one mombox, which I think cautious to take, establislimy health in its original state. It is with the most heart-felt gratitude, that I subscri be myself, Sir, your meell ~ L)liged-liumble Servant ' . 4 4 Deansgate, Manchester, Jai) , t,. iSot. lu. PEARSO•YO P. S. Fdr the public benefit, I do not object to the ab°, l being published, but leave you to act as your own bet t `' judgment shall diCiate. . Prepared and Sold by tbd sole Proprietor, Taos. TAYLOR, Member of the.Roval College Of Surge os° London, at his House, No. 9, New 13widge-street;, Where, alter a• constant residence of more than Tl l iety"• -l ' i : Years, in a practice. particularly directed to . the Cure - 'Venereal Complaints, and those incidental to the Par's - Generatibn in limb Sexes„ with that inviolable see'':; . , which Men' of his Profession should always observe, flatters himself, the• advice and assistance he gratuitofl. ly administers to Persons taking. this Medicine,. will; esteemed by a discerning Public, as an advantage. sel ll° „" to be obtained, and void of ambiguity.. ' Also scld,, by his Appointment, for• the convenience TE, those living at a distance, at the .Perfurner's S • ban's-street, Pall 'Mall ; the ToyOlopioNio• 103, 0 %11. 1. street ; Mr. DishOrougli's, Np. /, ; Steel's, Bookseller, 'No. t,. Union-row, Little Tower-hP: Mr. Bakter's • South-bridge,. Edinburgh ; Mr. Callwel Liverpool ;: Me.. Atkinson's, chester ; ,and by one Person in every considerable ToviLD Great Britain and I reland,..in Boxes of only . as. 9d • e' s- 0 1 7 sealed up .with full and plain directions, whereby person 5.4 either sex may 'cure themselves with case,,speed, secrecy,.'"' • • • safety. ,itil N. B. Every Box sold in Great Britain is sealed up '''.i,j a stamp, on which, by tabour of the Commissoners, is 1. e , ed, at i the Stamp-office, " T. Taylor, No. 9, New Dv o r p , street," to imitate whica is Felony; and all others are ': 3) , terfeit. • - _.O -,......._ tiurvinEE TH 1 TO -MC THE pi' Thursd with Katharii On Friday, On Saturda And on Mo TH EA', - M( Thursd With The Sp On Friday, nn Saturda v , The new 1); Ur ScasonS, 'lainly be p A new Trail e King ten Year. 13: Lt Richard wants Gecll Lett r 3 R 0 : rtler of the T() n ciav,the . s I, • .ty Me; IL AL . e , R •vq:, , ri }cod r Itl Fa rill tp Fa rnlia R I M °b-.am, k t t h e ! ,i iir w o Lot: I.kt 7rishbf.l t 1 )1 4 tri lel. to Partict pdforci, tit 'lttcn- , "e 1, 4 1 - 6 C 4 1. 1 la ne„ Farnha 4 ti ° wilt 'silt A tr is • ,rur I ` 5 clay b i •