The Sun. — London, England, 1822-05-14 00:00:00

~: t- .••••••••,, Os per I, neW , neW c — Aew.; - ,,, • . 44 - * I _ -4 1 I >, • , , n „, N / //t ; (.; ::_r:=i :.,~.. boll-- ;N:.•1 " ,9b, /4-Z iGs ad, r ---5 a Beano, , 4s 641 al, sd; 12s 6d, Is 0,1 a y Os Od N t TTIBER 9272.] TUESDAY, MAY 14, 1822. PRICE SEVf_INPENCE. —Oats CITY OF LONDON TAVERN, MAY 7, 182'2. AT a MEETING o f MERCHANTS; , BANKERS , and Others, convened this day by Public 43Av ertisement, THOMAS WILSON, Esq. M.P. in the Chair, ?Moved by THOMAS REID Esq. M.P. Resolved,... That a GenerdSubscription be now begun, for rnMediate assistance of the extreme temporary Distress of several Provinces or Districts of Ireland. .VNTLEIAIEN ADDED TO THE GENERAL COBIMITTEE. ..tl .. elChipman, Esq. Wm. Matthew Raikes, Esq. a p ro ea V co a n ug E ha s n q: Esq. Pascoe Orenfell, Esq. M.P. , he Committee beg to announce to the Public, that the fol "ialgsums have already been remitted, in aid of the local Subscription s formed for the Relief of Distress In Ireland : To the County of Clare - - - - .£lOOO • County and City of Limerick - 500 Galway and. Mayo - - - - 500 Keay - - - - 500 - Skibbereen and ita vicinity - - 100 J. Pearson, Esq. 25 0 Vice-Admiral Sir Jo- Mrs. E. CrOmleheilme 5 0 Mrs. C. Phillipps 3 3 Mr. John Hernon 2 0 Z. - 0 10 ROYAL ACADEMY, SOMEII.SET PLACE. THE EXHIBITION of the ROYAL ACA DEMY IS NOW OPEN. Admission (from Eight o'Clock till Serer)) One Shilling. Catalogue One Shilling. Sandwich, praying for a repeal of the Leather Tax. —OrJere& to be printed. • • ' Mr.'LITTLETON presented a Petition from Wolver hani-pton, praying a repeal of the Salt Tax.--Ordered to be printed. Sir N. COLTHURST gave notice, that on the 6th.of June he should move for a Committee on the Act of the 56th of the late King, respecting the importation of foreign butter.. Mt. S. WORTLEY presented a Petition from Whitley, in Yorkshire, praying far a reiksion of the Criminal Code.—Or tiered to lie on the table. . . a. Petition which had been presented . by the,Hon. Member foe Southivark (Sir It. Wilson) professing to come from niari.) thousand inhabitants.of hat . parish, and praying for a rerni,- sion of the remainder of the sentence upon Mr. Henry Hunt, The Petition which be (Mr. Butterworth) now held in •liii hand disavowed the sentiments of that Petition, which the pr e . seat Petitioners conceived wer e conve y e d i n language highly offensive to the. House. They said that no public meeting a the parishioners had been convened in order to deliberate upon the subject of the Petition, and , that the present, Petitioner 4 never heard a word of it until they. read an account of it in the newspaper reports. of the proceeding of that. House. They, utterly disclaimed all concurrence in the prayer of that Peti-: tion, and trusted that it would not be considered as.expressing the sentiments of 'the general 'hotly of the Parishieners. (Mr. Butterworth) understood that the names of many, N.: spectable individuals had. been affixed t o th a t P e titi on , a nd h e therefore trusted the Honourablii — Alember (Sir - It, NVilSor) would. state from whom it was that he had received it. The Honourable Member then moved that the present Petition. be brought up.. •• • - The SPEAKER here interposeil, and • said, there were se veral objections to - the recpving. of this paper. In the first place, it appeared to be a protest against what appeared to be a , newspaper report of the proceedings in that House. This 'was one•ohjeetion to its reception, on account of its disorderly reference_ to those, proceedings. In the next place, it o.'as a protest rather than petition. He therefore submitted to the Honourable Member whether he' would press his - motion. • Mr. BUTTERWORTH said , that, as the sentiments of the respectable persons who had signed, the Petition had been expressed, he would not press his motion against the de.cision of the Chair. He theretbre- withdrew it. • • • CIVIL ,LIST: • • ;11d--- seph Yorke, K.C.B. 5 0 From Messrs. Praeds and Co. Mr.'Orlibarn Turner 1 0 Benj. Wenthrop, Esq. 10 - 0 Right Hon. Lord De Dunstafiville - 52 10 Mr. James Hart 1 0 John Anderton, Esq. 2 0 From Messrs. Hopkinson & Co. H. P. Fuller, Esq. 5 0 From Messrs. Hammersleys and Co. T. B. - - 2s. 6d. W. B. - - 2s. 6d. Venn, Wright, and Co. 10 10 R. and B. B. - ' 2 0 G. P. Watkins, Esq. 10 10 Agassiz, Son, and Co. 30 0 Nicholas Pearse, Esq. 10 10 From Messrs. Willis, Percival, and Co. Boyd Miller 'Esq. 21 0 James R. Miller, Esq. 25 0 J. Bagwill, Esq. 21 0 From Messrs. Smith, Payne, and Siniths. By A. F. Haldimand and Son - - 100 0 Messrs. Clark, Anstead, 174 a s a 1£36 8.. FJOWARD, R.A. Sce rice of NATIONAC ANNUAL AN AL EXAMINATION of the CHILDBEN will take place in the NATIONAL CENTRAL SCHOOL, Bald win's gardens, Gray's Inn-lane, on WEDNESDAY, the 15th of May. His Grace the ARCHBISHOP of CANTEREURY will take the Chair at One o'Clock Precisely. t —'• trice of iarter ; Mr. SYKES presented a Petition from _certain holders of foreign corn in the town of Hull, upon the subject of the corn laws.—Ordered to lie upon the table. Mr. CURTEIS presented a Petition. from the Gtdwers of corn in the county of Suffolk against sorueof the proposed duties on the importation of corn.—Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. GOOCH • presented a Petition from the Hundred of Pittow, in the county of Suffolk, complaining of Agrictiltural Distress. marl et •n, was Beans, - I 0 1 1 5 0 5 0 G. W. - - Robert Powell, Esq. Mrs. Way - Richard Rocke, Esq. John Braham, Esq, Theatre D. L. C. D. - - - T. 'l'. WALMSLEY, D. D. Secretary f, 3s 4d A Ss tid7 SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING .THE ENLARGEMENT AND BUILDING OF 'CHURCHES AND C./JAMES. THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of this SOCIETY will be held, at tleir ROOMS. No. 31, Lincoln's Inn Fields, by adjournment, frim the Third Thurs day in May (being Ascension Day)., to kIONDAY, the nth instant.—His Grace, the Archbishop of CANTERBURY, will take the Chair etTwelve o'Clock precisely. W. JOENSON RODI3ER, 32, Lincoln's Inn Fields, Sib-Secretary. May 9, 821. 21 0 5 0 os od 6s Od i 4s 6d Thomas Neill, Esq. 10 0 Benjamin Wilson, Esq. 2 0 Kirks and Co. - 10 10 10 0 snd Co. Messrs. Smith, Inglis; and Co. 52 10 A similar Petition was presented from the Eastern division of Suffhlk.--:Ordered.to lie upon the tables Lord • EASTNOR . presented s Petition from Ryegate, praying the repeal of the Leather Tax.—Qrdered to lie upon the table. - • Hon. G. D. Ryder 1 1 Sir Gregory Lewin 1 1 From Messrs. Curries, Raikes, and Co. Mess: Curries, Raikes, and Co. - 109 0 Messrs. A. Reid and Co. Lir td-street 100 0 G. Mr. Simon Taylor Joshua Whalley N. M. P. Gowan - George Marx John Kenyon, Esq. Miss C 20 0 amt 5 0 10 10 .5 0 5 0 NOt'LcE.-- ( GOODS IN KIN(;' , .,•WAItEIiGIiSE.) Customhouse, London, 44th April, 1844. . EREAS sundry Gootb, subject to Duties t• Y of Customs-and Excise, bare renained..in his Majes ty's Warehouse, in the Customhouse, Lmdon, beyond the tittle allowed by Law, viz. Three Months,-4. The Commissioners of his Majesty'iCustms do hereby give NOT ICE, that unless the Duties due on the said Goods are fishy paid, .and the Goods taken away from the said Ware !Loose, on or before the 31st of May next, tiey will be imme diately disposed of according to Law. By Order of the Corrnissioners, (Signed) G. DELAVAUD, Sec. Mr. LILTME presented two Petitions from the City of Brechin, in Scotland, against the Royal Burghs' on the table. L 12s tid I i is 61 I 9s Od I —s ii/C1 .The Manslaughter Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed on Friday. CATHOLTC PEERS, _ . :urteis 31r. FLEMING presented Petition .'"from Portsea against the Bill for admitting Catholic Peers to sit in Parliament.— Ordered to be printed. L 3os od i 27$ Od L —5 ad Mr. BURRELL presented a Petition to the same ea& from Brighthelmstone.—Ordered to be'printed. Mr. L. KECK presented a Petition 'from the Archdeaamry of Leicester, praying that the Bill for admitting Catholic Peers might not pass into a law.—Ordered to be printed. REMOVAL OF POOR BILL. its the ', wain ad, and 21 0 ADDITIONAL SUBSCRIPTIONS. 3 1r. E. J. Body - 1 0 Messrs. T. Poynder & i' le "rs- J. Wild & Sons 10 10 Son - 60. 0 - allies Weale, Esq. 1 1 Messrs. Raven, Farris, -- Macnarnara, Esq. - 31 10 • and Co. - 5 5 Alessrs. Stubbs,•Abso- Messrs. Beckford and lotn, and Canning -21 0 Rankin - -10 10 Col onel Thornton 5 0 P. J. Miles, Esq. M. P. 50 0 l a ) ;Poynder 10 10 4' 4 3. Baronneau - 20 0 Henry Smith, Esq. 25 0 Rev. H. J. Hare 5 0 Messrs. Clarke & Barlow 10 0 Th o mas TowleyEsq. 10 10 Sir M. W. Ridley, Bart. 21 0 ilbert Jones, Esq. 5 5 Messrs. Thomas &W. D avid Caddell,n' Esq . . •5 5 - Brunton - ~1 7,0 . Ilutchiso Lsq 10 0 Messrs. Gouldsmith & 1.1 - • /V- - - 1 1 Burls . 5 5 - S. - - - 1 1 Rev. James Ord 10 10 A few Friends- , Red John Plumptre, Esq. 20 0 Lion Tavern, Cie- . Rev. R. Fitzwilliam 10 0 rnent's-lane • - 5-5 Missllarriett Clements 20 0 " 11 0 Hunter, Esq.' - 3 3 William Dean, Esq. 1 1 Due of Devon.shire 500 0 R. T. Thompson, Esq. It £2 lOs. 6d. •• ' Kirby, Hull 30 0 J. Bate, Esq. King 10 0 Robert Playf "r, Esq. 1 1 Thomas Wilson, Esq. 31 10 Mr ' 11. J Robinso 1 1. The Gentlemen of the John Exley, Esq. 5 0 Accountant's Office, 711° Izas Shepherd, E sq . 20 0 E as t I n di a H ouse £24 7s 6d IV • • buncombe, Esq. - W. A. Garratt, Esq. 21 0 Atr A ;I I „' 11 - - 21 0 Francis Garratt, Esq. 21 0 " "-uatn P - E 20 0 Pinto and Urquhart '5O 0 A t e- IL C. Pang sq. OF. L. - - 2 O . - 5 -4essrs. Robert Bane- From Grote, Prescot, & Co. A well and Sons 31 10 John Soane, Esq. 21 0 -Lnu nYrilous 2 0 Pearse, Thomas, Esq. 1 1 Joh n —P. R hE - 5 0 Wilson, C: B. Esq. 5.0 0 I , a.sc , . T. sarripayo, Esq.loo OH.J. C. - 10 0 S. Birch, Es Aldan. 10 0 Sim. Enderby, Esq. 30 0 ' ‘' le ssrs. H. q 'Fletcher, Mrs. S. Enderby 5 0 ~ Son, and Fearnall 21 0 Mr. C. Enderby 5 0 u r nes Upton, Esq. 5 5 Messrs. Cuttleys, an d ~,''''• Hobson Esq 50 0 Esdaile - 25 0 L'•• West, E . sq. -- I' . 0 Roebucks; Stowe, and roragessrs.Hodsoll&Stirhng Taylor - 10 10 •L•Zieholas B rown , E sq . 10 10 F rom M essrs. Dorrien, Ma -7,igs Brown - - 2 2 gens, an d C o. "ut• Andrew Baird 2 0 Messrs. Jos. and Wm. Major Ord - - 3 0 Saunders Ci •F. Goodenough, Esq. 5 0 C. H. - Mthias Atwood, Esq. 50 0 Sir R. Peet, Bart. 0m Messrs. Drummond's. D. H. Rucher, Esq. Col onel Wm Napier 5 0 Mrs. Rucher - 5 5 '1,..• W. . _ 16 OJ. A. Rucher, Esq. 10 10 nob Lord ert Ashton Esq. 3 OJ. P. - -' • - 1 0 Bish of 0 'rd 50. 0 From Messrs. Jones,.Lloyd, Pent o p x! of Whitworth 100 0 and Co. l'encer Percival, Esq. 100 OD. Fulk, Esq. - 2 0 i t t„ l l. Bunbury 50 OJ. Dickinson Esq. 5 0 L 1111 ury- - ' 44 9' 1 3 b 5 0 Collman, Lambert, &Co. 5 0 a dY L. M. Lennox 10 10 ' From Williams, Williams, C. 4 myth, Esq. - 20 0 Burgess, & Co. r - J • Hobson 21 - 0 Williams, Williams,'& Vi J. si e•e,-Adtniral Curzon 10 0 Co. - - 100 0 LW. St, Paul, Bart. 25' 0 Adm. Sir J. Ord, Bt. 10 0 ti t .'Capt. R. Hall, Lo • Robert Smith 50 0 John Mangle-r, Esq. 50 0 41 Radstock - 5 0 Rear-Admaal Ross Don el T a lb ot - • - 200 0 nelly - 20 0 eU. and Rev. J. C. William Broderip, Esq. 5 5 albot - - 25 0 John Christie - 50 0 %,.. e °,rge Yeates, ESq. 3 0 From Messrs. Sansom & Co. Co -• 4. • J. Hope 3 0 -Ames Hayton, Esq. 1 1 latess of Athlone 20 T. Wishart, Esq. 10 0 R e v- John Liptrott 5 0 From Sir J. Perring, Bart. Rev: ti sl , u • Champ ag n e 20 0 an d C o . 3/ '''°l) of 'Durham 100 -0 J. R. Hoffman, Esq. 5 5 k:'srs• brummonas 100 OE. D. Denyer, Esq. 1 0 CCP . ' °f:Londanderry 200' 0 Mr. W. R. H. Brown 1 1 k ess - - - 10 0 W. S. S. - 1 0 h rs. Peter and John Mr. W. Lewin - 2 2 11 , 1, -- `,, urie - - 2 2 Anonymous - 2 0 10 (4 3 of Bath - 100 0 From Messrs. Pole, Thorn m Ui,Alrs. Gen. Grey 25 0 ton, & Co. ge n eral ge• - - - - 10 10 Captain A. J. Griffiths, Ashe - 5 0 Bart. - - 2 2 4.: d . „ I C - - 1 1 H. T. llewet, Esq. 10 0 ilk ',aid Babel-, En. 10 10 Venn, Wright, & Co. 10 10 Li e ilenry Holland 55 R. and E. B. - 2 0 i11.t.„,-General Sir T. G. P. Watkins, Esq. Re l Z . !°P; Bart. G.C.B. 5 5 Broadway - 10 10 U. i-‘ 4l.oo lons, Esq. 'lO 10 Messrs. Agassiz, Son, c . -.4,• Blount Esq. - 5 5 and Co. - 30 0 tl e - • L ' - - 2 2 Nicholas Pearse, Esq. 10 10 ThrlarA.l3ates, Esq. . 2 0 From Messrs. Marryat, Kay, Lord I Phop of Carlisle 30 0 and Co. It e ,' iso• Sidmouth 1W) 0 Mr. J. Robinson 2 0 ••_3lrJohn Robinson, E . B. Langton, jun. Esq. 10 10 b e ,, r t• - - 50 0 E Bicknell, Esq. 10 10 14 k 1:: of.„ Canterbury 5 0 Mr. R. Gardner 1 0 Ai s - 7 . tiliyes 5 0 Mr. R. F. New Man 1 1 'N I Phila. Mitford 5 5 Hart Robinson, Esq. 10 10 I1 0 :hY Brent, Esq. 55T. S. - - 1 1 W Captain G. G. Fraser, Hullah, & Son 5 5 Rieh a lu,egave - 5 0 From Messrs. Whitmore, Airy, at ' rapier, Esq. 5 0 Wells, .& Co. , Ali 11 - Napier - 5 0 31essrs.Whitmore,Wells, 414 4 Louisa Napier 5 0 & Whitmore 100 0 Li eu s ( -i• J. Wells,M.P. wt• - Generrnal Were 5 0 G. T. Buckley, Esq.loo 0 -kiss ki ll, er Hussey 5 0 live, let live, to live 100 0 Aiiss Vekertore - 1 0 Messrs. Wilson, Min- R . A . - ‘ ,. r. Bickerton 1 0 shull, Ashmore, and h 1\ - 2 Hodgkinson 50 0 -ktev. • •C'''• Kempthorne 2 0 George Henckell, Esq. 10 10 51 t. `V. Gamier' 50 OE. Maitland, Esq. 10 10 I t ß o b Miller 1 1 John Hollis, Esq. 5 5 Al e r v s . ti • NV. S. Goddart 10 0 W. Hunt Micklefield 5 0 (.:01,;„` T e i Karnag e 2 2 R o b ert Patterson, Esq. 10 0 4. 1% .' B. Joh n Stapleton 50 To feed the Hungry 1 0 4 li - -20 P. L. Godsal, Esq. 2 0 ti e „ ugh Rowland 2 0 Francis Knight, Esq. 10 0 ..1.4t:, s 7t-C o lo nelD'Aquitars 0 Lady and Miss Moles- , M arqui s , . - 1 1 worth .: - 10 0 it ,a . is of NI aterford 100 0 Mr. J. Matson - 1 1 r _J Lees - - 1 J. Baker , - 1 0 u t o I hum. Chambers and John Round, Esq. 2 2 N' -4 L. p S un- Mrs. Rowley - 10 0 A Li d ePYs, Bart. 55J.G. P. - - 5 0 Si t.. W. Ay ~ - - 010 Lord R. Seymour 50 0 i-lar " u ners and kr, Puss How e }- 50 0 A v fe e w aze F y r , i s ends at Mr. 5 9 ~ arnes Du ki r 1311 1 st r o de P p a 2 2 From Messrs. March, Stacey, - r. LI J . •-•eOrge ' 1 1 and Co. ,p, A Haggett 2 0 George Croft, Esq. and IV - i,•,.-••••• 1 1 Family - 5 0 4 1. 1 . 111111 Drewe, Esq. 21 0 From Messrs. Morlands & Cb. h• 11 sho t , of 1 1 J. B. Danvers, Esq. 10 10 kr s 1 , . Salisbury 20 0 From Messrs. Ransom & Co. ll_ .rzoe . ll _ o ni addition 10 0 Colonel Serle - 1 0 J, 'A. and to_ 10 0 Messrs. Atkinson and •IL L "cv• P. Mead 5 2 0 Ail s 1: 1 1 4 ' Es 1 1 A. Averl Y - - 0 Ile 8 _ei 1 Cl. 17; - - 1 p r V : 34. 11. utkr -10 H. S. - .. . 1 0 31 u ul Me ssm G. 21 0 Messrs. Ransom & Co. 100 0 essr s. •In & Co. Hon. Miss Rimmond 21 0 ul • and co: Th • , milli, W. Henderson, Esq. •10 0 • 100 1., W. Evans, Esq. 3I .P. 50 0 . 10 10 - 1. 0 100 0 15 15 M 3 161 i 22s Od I 20$ Cd 16s Oa 1-5 Od id a 21$ fanner; ry little tly mat ; °au, - Barley. 13 , Bare 3 , ;,, Hog :r; Oat' :k, 429 3 L 47s Oti ► 'ails, N•► u`,--s; 1, Isla ef t 179; ler saciL', If ,•heat Barley , 3 ed Per a eli ° a a .....s od a-9 od a--- 9 ° I a """' °" a 26s ° a , 21s 06 bushel bushel q uarter q uarter bushel lack. a 4s (3` l 9 d—Oat ° a 79 6(l' i 9s °Lk' a ss C )a a a 5s od. 3d 3 69 CI! was wel t r than r t 1 e and I° l - d and 5° Satur da y nutue" °- 5 Ws , to W e ethe ll shovi sf el. I °' in Theo !scrption! at f°ll/3" atl le o 0 sold . s were pc ! nest, a a;: i for !2 11 s old view weigh last Wet e have ar un." - i , ,Td to tbir? remain s : s to 4 , ° 0 ; I; to 31 ' 0 ; )3 to a the W A tAs. Admiral Sir .J. Gore 10 10 Rev. Dr. D'Oyley 5 0 Capt. Garrett, R.N. 2 2 S. Lunston - - 2 2 Sun Fire Office 100 0 X. Y. - - - 1 1 Messrs. Twiss and Browning Xi. R. Griffin - - Messrs. Vand de Watt and Co. • - - 5 5 From Sir J. W. Lubbock, Bart. and Co. T. F. Forster and Co. 0 John Curteis - 10 0 C. K. Somerset, Esq. 21 0 W. Knatchbull, Esq., 21 0 Hilton, Darby, & Knott 5 5 Ralph Palmer, Esq. 10 10 M. G. - 1 1 Stubbs Fran Perry lO 0 Mrs. Comerford 0 10 Mrs. Bingham 0 10 R. Alexander, Esq. 21 0 Sir J. B:; Lamb, _Bart. 20 0 Mr. S. Sawyer 1 0 Mrs. E. Strange 0 5 Mrs. M. Stapeley 0 .5 Mr. B. Lewis : - 0 5 - 10 10 - 1 1 2 0 Thomas Wane, Esq. B. M. Forster, Esq. J. A. M. - Mr. John Fry 0 5 Mr. R. L. D. Chapman 1 0 Mr. Prince _ - 1 0 Sir R. B. Harvey, Bart. 50 0 Robert Page, Esq. 1 1 A. B. - 1 0 Mr. L Cook - Mr. H. B. Lushman A Friend to the Dis- W. Forrest Cufit 2 0 J. and B. Jeffery 10 10 Mr. Stephen Alley 1 1 John Harvey, Esq. 20 0 E. Perkins and Co, 10 10 B. S. Oliver - 2 2 Messrs. Tatlock &Hogg 10 •10 P. W. Mayow, Esq. 10 10 From Messrs. Everett and Co. J. Gale Everett, Esq. 21 0 Mrs. Bayley - - 2 2 From Messrs. Sikes, Snaith, and Co. Fliscacy and Hunt Josh. Watson, Esq. Messrs. Spence & Dess borough - - 2 2 Rev. Dr. L. Peasmars" 1 1 From Messrs. Ladbrokes & Co. Messrs. Brownes and Bird - 20 0 C. R. - - 5 0 R. Kelley, Esc 5 0 From Sir Wm. Curtis, Bart. • and Co. Messrs. Combe, Dela. field , and- Co. - 106 0 31. Monteford, Esq. 10 0 R. G. per Mr. Were 5 0 Samuel Fenning 5 0 William Offley 20 0 Hinchliff and Green 5 5 Mrs. R. G. - 5 0 Hillutt and Sanders 5 0 A. M. - - '5 0 John Delord - - 2 0 A. Townsend -. 5 5 John Haffenden 5 5 From Messrs. Martin, Stone, and Co. Wm. Atkinson, Esq. 5 5 R. Linklater, Esq. 5 , 5 John Nesbitt, Esq. 21 4) John Genie, Esq. 30 0 Messrs. Quarles, Har ris, and Sons 31 10 From Messrs. Hoare, Barnett, and Co. John Usbarne, Esq. 21 0 Mrs. Usbarne - 10 10 The Misies Usbarne 10 10 E. P. F. - - - 1 1 E. and G. N. Driver 5 5 Wrn. Oxenford - 5 O. tressed Irish 2 0 Dowager Lady Lismore 5 0 A Lady - 2s. 6d. Miss Elizabeth Fry 1 - 0 M. B. Bere, Esq. 5 0 W. Hobson, jun. Esq. 50 0 From Messrs. Bouverie and Antrobus. 0-. H. D. Pennant, Esq. 50 0 Mrs. Pennant - 5 0 G. Templeman, - Esq. 10 0 F. -' 25, 0 From Messrs. Stephenson,Re mingtons, and Co. Messrs. Stephenson, Re mingtons, and Co. 100 0 Bazett, Farquhar, Crau ford, and Co. 100 0 G. C. Harvey,. Esq. 5 5 N. E. Porter,9th Lancers 5 0 , Mrs. Mary Porter 10 0 J. W. - - 1 -1 Dr. Outrand 2 2 Wm. Swath, Esq. 25 0 Thompson and Ashton 10 10 S. Robinson; Esq. 2 0 W. Ilarryman, Esq. 5 0 W. Cooke, Esq. .10• 10 R. Littlehales, Esq. Winchester - 5 0 Miss Littlehales 1 0 W. and S. Graves 1 1 T. Wilson, Esq. Wap ping 5 0 T. Ashness, Esq. 10 0 J. H. Lewis, Esq. 10 0 Rev. T. J. Bramly 1 0 From Messrs. Gosling and Sharpe. G. J. Cholmondeley, Esq. 100 0 J. B. Monck, Esq.' M.P. 20 From Messrs. Coutts and Co. H. Stuart, Esq. of Pro mans, by his Guar dian 100 0 A. Lawrie, Esq. 10 10 John Lawrie, Esq. 5 5 Lord Harris - 10 10 Lady Harris - 2- 0 Miss Harris - - 1 0 Miss Mary Harris 1 0 Joseph Baker, Esq. 10 0 Major H. Mercer 10 0 W. P. Alcock - 5 0 From Messrs. Stevenson and Salt. Messrs. Stevenson and Salt - - 100 0 C. Baldwin, Esq. 10 10 P. and J. Arnold• 1 1 From Messrs. Bosanquet and , Co. F. Freeling, Esq. 5 5 Wm. Hall, Eiq. 5 0 From Sir J. Esdaile and Co. ' The Lord Bishop of Bristol - 20 0 Rev. J. C. Ebden, Tri nity Hall - 2 0 Subscriptions from Tunbridge Wells. Rev. W. Nicholson 1 1 W. E. Wright, Esq. Messrs. Macare and Peachier - - Capt. Coghlan, R.N. J. Kiernan, Esq. Messrs. Lewis, Tate, and Co. - - 10 0 Wm. Fanning, Esq. 2 0 Anonymous, through T. S. R. being part of £2OO received; £l5O being • appro priated in aid of local Subscriptions before the General Meeting - - 50 0 By Messrs. Lewis, Tate, and Co. - - 10 0 Froth Barnard, Dimsdale, and Charles Dodd, Esq. 2 2 From Messrs. 'Puget, Bain bridge, and Co. Admiral Sir J. H.Whit shed, K.C.B. 25 0 Charles M. St. George 10 0 Richard French, Esq. 10 0 Lieut. Gen. Hart, 111. P. 21 0 Co. Barnard, Dimsdale, & Co. - - - 100 0 Thos. Dimsdale, Esq. 21 0 T. D. - - - 2 2 Mrs. Deverell - 2 0 T. and Ph. Griffith 10 10 Sir R. B. de Capel Dr. T. Hume, M.D. 10 0 Brooke, Bart. 4 20 0 Rev. A. Lockhart 3 3 Wm. James Thompson 5 0 'William Jacob, Esq. 3 3 Wm. Davis, Esq. Lay- Rev. H. Harvey 2 2 tonstone - 5 0 From Wright, Selby, & Co. E. A. S. - - 30 0 Frederick Webb, Esq. 5 5 Dr. Babington - 5 0 StibScriptions will be received by Smith, Payne and Smiths ; Barclays, Tritton, and Co. ; Spooner, Attwoods. and - Co. ; Bosanquet and Co. ; Sir John Perring and Co. ; Lioutts and Co.;• Drummonds and Co. ; Birch, Chambers, and Co. ; Snow and Paul ; Glyn and Co.; Gosling and' Co. ; and by all the Bankers of London and Westminster. The Committee will meet at the City of London Tavern daily, at Eleveli for Twelve. The Public are requested to pay their Subscriptions at the Committee Room at the City of London Tavern, between the Hours of Twelve and Four, or to the Bankers of the Metropo lis, no other person being authorised by the Committee to re ceive them. By Order of the Committee, MICH. Wll. TROY, Hon. Secretary. TO SHIP OWNERS. FROM the result of the . Trials made in the last and present years with the Merchants Shippitig, particularly by the Trafalgar Cutter to the Coast of Atrica, and, the Eden West Indianian, after a twelve months voyage and stay,at Jamaica and the Havannah, Messrs. UROWELL and Co. consider themselves warranted - in asserting that UNBLEACHED CANVAS, made of IfernP and 'Flax, is snore durable, particularly in tropical-climates, both for Sails and Stores, than the white kinds, and is 20 per'Cent. cheaper. A supply of excellent and IMPROVED SCOTCH CANVAS, which has undergone the ANTI. MILDEW PROCESS, May be, constantly bad, marked with their stamp, at the Ware houses of Messrs. Chalmers and Guthrie, Idol-lane, Tower street, and Me, Balmanne, 78 Queen -street, Cheapiide.• 21 0 10 10 5 0 0 5 5 0 50 0 0 5 0 - 5 5 0 5 5 21 0 20 U PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF. LORDS, MONDAT , MAY 13. Mr. MAsoN presented an Accourt of the Sa laries and Pensions granted by. fie /East India Company during the lastmonth.—Laid on the table. Mr: BROGDEN and others brought up frcrn the Commons the Silk Lace - Duties Bill, and several pfivate Bills, whiCh were read a first time. Mr. WALLACE and others brought up a message from the Commons requesting that Lord Stowell be allowed to attend the Committee on Foreign Trade. The LORD CHANCELLOR inform the Commons-that their Lordships would send an answer by messengers of their own. HORSE TAX. Earl GREY stated, that an application had•been made to him by a very meritorious class of men in the'county of Nor thumberland, respecting the levying of a tax which they con ceived ought to be abolished. Those farmers who held farms under 501. a year had. by the Act passed in 1815, been subjected to an inferior ratee of duty for the horses which they kept.-- When the Horse Act had been repealed last year, the same indulgence hadnot been extended to them. Yeta general impres sion prevailing that they were exempted from the tax, the first order given to the assessors had been not to charge them. This, however, had sinc e b een c h ange d, an d t h ey h a d b een assesse d as liable to the duty. He menti o n e d t hi s , i n t h e h ope t h at t h e . Noble Earl opposite would be able to interfere in tba matter — the more so, as the amount of duty thus collected must be a very inconsiderable object. The Earl of LIVERPOOL would certainly inquire into the subject with Ml the indulgent consideration due to the clags of men by whom the applications had been made. He could not speak at present as to the principle of the matter, but should take care that it be referred to the proper authority; and should take'an opportunity of letting the Noble Earl know privately. whether it was in the, power, of his Majesty's Government to grant relief. ' _ Earl GREY then presented a Petition from the pentry, Clergy, Yeomanry, Farmers, and Land Owners of the County of Monmouth;•voted unanimously at a most numerous meeting, and describing, in strong terms, the distre s s es o f agr i cu lt ure .— Read, and laid on the table. • • The Earl of DARLINGTON presented a Petition from Barnard Castle, in the County of Durham, praying for some measure to facilitate the recovery of small debts.—Laid on the table. The BISHOP of LONDON presented a Petition which was underst6od to , be from certain congregations in Long..acre, against the proposed concession to the Catholics.—Laid on the table. The,Earl of SHAFTESBURY presented a similar Petition from the Surveyors and Bufgesses of the town of Beverley.— Laid on the table. JOINT STOCK BANKS. • The Marquis of LANSDOWNE wished to ask a question of the Noble Earl opposite, arising out of the Correspondence which had been laid before the House, pursuant to his motion. He wished to know whether it was to be inferred from that Cor respondence that those Co-partners, who were to be formed in the country, in consequence of the proposed extension of the right of banking, were not only to be debarred from the power of issuing notes within 65 miles of London, but of that of issu e, ing them payable by Correspondents in town, or within the prescribed distance. If the latter were•the case their circula tion could not be very extensive. • The Earl of LIVERPOOL replied that it was not intended that the notes issued by those Banks should be payable in London, so as to circulate in town. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE was understood to ask whether any change was to take place in the usual practice of country Bankers to have Agents or 'Correspondents in town, where their notes might be paid. • The Earl of LlVERPOOL—Certainly not. REVERSIONARY GRANTS. The Earl GROSVENoR meved for Returns of the places granted in reversion since the Ist of January, 1821, and tbr si milar Returns relative to Courts of Justice. After a few observations from the Earl of LIVERPOOL, Lord ELLENnonotIGH, and the Marquis of LANSDOWNE, the motion was agreed to. scoTcri PEERS. The Resolutions submitted to the Committee of. Privileges having been read, The Earl of ROSEBERRY said, that in referring to the Journals of the House, he found that in December 1761, the House had , come to the Resolution that two persons claiming the same title should-not vote, and that the only mode adopted to give effect to that Resolution had been to send notice of it to the Lord Clerk Register. It would sav e thei r Lo r d s hip s ' time to follow the example of this precedent, as it would render a Bill unnecessary. He should therefore only move that notice of the Resolutions before the House be given to - the Lord Clerk Register. The Marquis of LOTHIAN supported the motion, which was agreed to after a few words from the Earl of Lauderdale. DISTRESS IN IRELAND. The Earl of DARNLEY wished to ask of the Noble 'Earl opposite whether he would have any objection' to give the date of the first representation made to the Irish Government re specting the distresses of the people, and that of the first mea sure adopted for their relief. The Earl of LIVERPOOL could not give an answer to that question at present, but suggested that the Noble Lord might bring it forward in the shape of a motion. ' The Earl of DARNLEY had it in contemplation to make a Motion on that subject next Friday, unless the Noble Earl should attend in his -place to-morrow 'and should be able to give an answer. The Earl of LIVERPOOL was not certain that it would be in his power-to be in his place to-morrow. here the conversation dropped, and the House adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. • MISCELLANEOUS. Mr. FLEMING presented a Petition from certain Owners and Occupiers of Land in Romsey Marshes, in the County of Southampton, complaining of Agricultural Distress, and pray ing for a reduction of taxation.—Ordered to be printed. A sim it Petition was presented from Eye, in Suffolk, and praying tTiat foreign bonded.corn might not be allowed to come into the market.-Ordered to lie on the table. Mr..MARRYATT presented a Petition from the'town of 'WI : S. WHITBREAD presented a Petition from the Pa rish of St. Andrew, Holborn ' against the Bill for preventing -the removal of the Poor.—Orderedto be printed. Mr. WODEHOUSE presdbted a Petition from Norwich against the Bill for preventing the removal of the Poor.----Or dared to lie on the table. Mr. BURRELL presented a Petition from Walesbury to the same effect. He remarked, that he considered the Bill cal culated to produce a vagrant population throughout • the- coun try. No legal men ever introduced a Bill into the House which he considered to be so defective. • Mr. S. BOURNE concurred entirely in what had fallen from the Honourable Member. The Petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. BASTARD presented a Petition from a place in De=- vonshire against the Bill for altering the. Poor Laws. The-Pe tition, with a similar one from Kingsbury, was ordered to lie upon the table. " POSTMASTER-GENEKAL IN SCOTLAND. Sir R. FERGUSON gave notice that on the 23d of this month he should move an Address to the Throne for abolish ing the Office of Postmaster-General in Scotland. IRISH TITHES. Mr. BECIIER presented a Petition from certain Owners of Land of Castle Maynard, in the County of Cork, praying a, Revision of the Tithe System in Ireland. The Honourable. Member expressed his hope that the subject would come before . the House previous to the expiration of the Session—Ordered to be printed. TREASURER OF MIDDLESEX, • Mr. S: WHITBREAD moved for a return of the arnount t;sf balance remaining in the hands of the Treasurer for the county , of Middlesex.—Ordered. • WAREHOUSING BILL. • Mr. WALLACE postponed the Committee upon. the Ware housing Bill to Wednesday next. SALFOLD COUNTY COURT BILL. Mr. C. BATHURST presented a Petition from certain Attornies in the Hundred of Salford (as was understood), against the Salford County Court Bill.---Ordered to lie upon the table. Lord STAN LE Y presented a 7 PCtitiori froni 'the town' of Salford, praying that the Bill, for, preventing the removal of the Poor might not pass into a law:--Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. BLACKBURNE moved the third reading of the Sal ford County Court' ' • ' • • Mr. C. BATHURST opposed the Bill. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL objected to the principle of the Bill, but his observations were made in so low a tone as to he freqnently inaudible. Ile was understood to say that, independent of his objection to erect a new Court of the nature intended, he thought that the powers which it would possess ought not to be granted even to the established County Court. He moVed as an amendment, 4 ' That the Bill be read a third time this day six months." Lord .ALTHORPE supported the Bill. He observed that Petitions had been presnted in its favour from Manchester, Bolton,•Ashtown, and Oldham; while the only opposition made to it by petition, was from the Gentlemen of the legal profes sion, Who' undoubtedly would find it very natural to oppose any thing which should lessen their emoluments. • Mr. B. WILBRAHAM contended that the Bill was totally dissimilar from all others upon the same subject. He wished it to be better Understood before'it was passed into a law. He should therefore hope that the Bill would be withdrawn for another year. Mr. BROUGHAM supported the Bill. He contended that it was calculated to give a most populous district the means of obtaining justice upon moderate terms. It was always the same, when any measure for reforming abuses came before them. They were always met by pointing to something 'else which might be done withgrea.ter advantage. He thought the conduct of the House upon these subjects would be discovered, and that before it was too late. He was quite convinced that if the Bill were rejected, it would be for one of two reasons— either upon the practice to which he had alluded, or • from the influence of the Solicitors whose interests' would be affected by it. He trusted, however, that the House would better per form their duty, and adopt the Bill. Mr. B. WILBRAHAM and Mr. BROUGHAM mutually ex plained. Gvleral GASCOYNE was convinced that the Rrinciple of the Bill was good, and that if it were adopted witH regard .to Manchester, its advantages would Soon be extended to other parts of the country. Mr. SCARLETT understood the principal objection to the measure to be, that it placed the administration of justice under the controul of an individual. With regard to the pre visions of the Bill, he considered them advantageous. ' Mr. PETER 'MOORE wished that such Bills might be passed for all parts of the country. Mr. C. WILSON was of opinion that the measure was only intended for the aggrandisement of one Noble 'FamilY. He. spoke there from a sense of duty, and the rank or station, of 'any of the parties would not influence his conduct. His im pression was, that the Bill would be highly pernicious in its' results. It would'undoubtedly transfer the receipt of some thousands a year from one set of pockets to another. But if the advantages of the Bill were such as they had been repre sented, it ought riot to be confined to one hundred, but ,to be extended over the whole country. Upon these• grounds he, should oppose the Bill. The Reuse then divided, when there appeared— For the Amendment - 96 Against it - - .70 Majority A conversation then followed between Mr. SOLICITOR-Cr E RAL, Mr. BROUGHAM, and Mr. IlopuousE, when. The SPEAKER put the question for the reading of the Bill that day six months, which was carried in the affirmative, 'and the Bill was therefote lost. • A Message from the Lords here announced their Lordships' Assent to several Bills. Mr. RAMSDEN presented a Petition from several Free holders of Yorkskire, against the Yorkshire Pa hi Regulation Bill. The Hon. Member said, he believed the general feelings of the County were against the Bill. A similar Petition was presented by Mr. S. WonTveY.— Both Petitions were ordergl tr.i lie on the table. Mr. KENNEDY postponed the second reading of the Scotch Jury Regulation Bill until the 22d inst. Mr. MONCK presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of Reading, against the Poor Removal Bill.—Ordered to lie on . the table: MR. *HUNT. Mr. BUTTERWORTH said, he had a Petition of an ex traordinary nature to offer to the notice of the House. h was from the Churchwardens, Directors, and Overseers of the poor of the parish of St. Matthew, Bethnal-green, and referred to Mr. LENNARD, alluding to the motion of which he had given notice for Wedrieiday - nekt, said that it was his inten tion to move for a Committee respecting the allowances mac/Lt... to persons in the third class. of that List, and that if he sue- seeded in'obtaining &Committee, he. purposed moving an Ad dress to the Crown. for a reduction, of the expense attending that class. .• • - POOR LAWS. Mr.•BIRCH presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of the 'Parish of St.. Mary, Nottingham, against the Bill brought in by the Hon. Member for Peterborough, generally calldrl the Poor RemovaL Bill. He (Mr. B.) entirely. concurred in the sentiments of the Petition. • 111r,SCARLETT begged to Ask his 'lion. Friend whether it was right that 60 women, who might be seduced ina large ma nufacturing. town,.shoUld' be removed, under the present laws, to other. - parishes, and:. thuS. burthen the inhabitants with the 'fruits of that seduction ?—(A laugh.) -111 r. M:' A. TAYLOR postponed, until the 6th of June, his , motion.raipecting the-practice of the Court of Chancery. • Col. DAVIES postponed until next Session his motion re sliectingOfficers of the Army dismissed without a Trial by Court .Martial. : He.certainly should bring the subject forward 'next Session. ~ • Lord A. HAMILTON presented a Petition from certain in. corporated.Merthantsfof Edinburgh against the Royal Burghs Bill, introduced by the Learned Lord opposite. The . :Noble Lord requested to..know what were the intentions of the. Learned Lord respecting that Bill. He treated the House would' narrowly watch it, • and not delegate its parliamentary power to individuals. The LORD ADVOCATE said it was-his intention to carry the Bill through the }louse as soon .as- possible; but he was perfectly willing to meet .the convenience of the Noble Lord. est() the day for discussing.it. After a few words from - Lord A. HAM IL T lc, the Petition wa4 orderedlo lie on the table. ' • ,Mr. P. MOORE presented a Petition from the inhabitants of Coventry against the-ktoorr Removal Bill. Ordered to -lie on ;.. the table, and, on the motion of.Mr.,DEsmAN, to be printed. CATHOLIC. PEERS BILL. . Mr. CANNING - mooed the Order of the Day. for. the:House resolving itself into a Committee on. the Roman. atholic 'Peers Relief Bill. • • •- The Clouse being in a Committee. Mr. CANNING• - said, that the attention of the House had not, on the discussion of this Bill, been drawn. to the oath of allegiance, which it was undoubtedly necessary should be taken by every Peer. It had been left out•of the Bill from the same catwe,•- that attention had not been drawn to it. He now had merely to move for the introduction of a clause for the taking of the oath of allegiance. The clause was then agreed to, the House resumed, and the Report of the Committee was ordered to betaken into consider.. ation on Wednesday next; and in the interim to he printed. AGRICUi,TURrAI, RBP OIIT. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY moved the Order of the Day for the consideration of the Report oitUe Agriculturul . Committee. A• conversation then took place between the Noble . 3.laNtiis, Mr. ScARLETT, and Colonel DAvIEC. as to the pOstpone•- tnent of the notices of motion given by the two lam: Pon : . Members. Mr. SCARLET 1' at length postponed until the 31st his rnt;:" tion respecting the Poor Remova l but I 1 -11 ;AN' lES id he felt bound to bring forw . ard the Resolutions of which he had - given notice., General GASCOYNE said, he conceived that the Agricul tural Committee had been totally mistaken in principle, and that the Resolutions, founded upon their Report, were a delu sion upon the country. He should, in the first stag..* ofttly Bill, resulting - from those Resolutions,. give it his decided op position. The SPEAKER haying put the question, that the Resolu tions of the Committee of the whole House be agreed to, - Colonel DAVIES then rose.—ln thus offering himself to the 'attention of the House, he felt it necessary to guard againit being misunderstood. ft was not his intention to oppose the' •-• Resolutions of the Noble Martinis (Londonderry) ; on the con trary, he meant to support them as far as they went, as he con ceived them better than the present law ; but he should pro pose a set of Resolutions, which' the House might pass cost jointly with those of the Noble Lord, cr they would reieet"thee one or the other, •or both, as to them.might teem fit. - When this question was first introduced, he had` determined not to offer a word upon it ; but when he found severaldifferent sets of Resolutions; not drawn up with . a View to immediate relief, but of providing•against remote contingencies, which he hoped they should never live to see, he felt himself boUnd to propose some measures calculated to give immediate relief: The , had - been told by high authority, no less, than that of the Noble . Marquis . (Londorderry) himself, that the distresses were pro duced, rot by taxation, 'but by an over-abundant produce. This was, in fact, saying that corn roust remold. at 70s.ribtr quarter ; for if the supply were lessened, it would be impOstble to produce torn with a profit under that.price. lie, on the con trary, thought low prices - were best for she country. The Reso lutions with which he should conclude would go to regulate to a certain extent the importations from Ireland. la saying this, he - meant nothing hostile to Ireland ; but while he was ready to do justice to that country he hoped he should have the conenrienee of the Irish Members in claiming justics for England. It tipptared that in England there was imposed upon Rides, Salt,'-ard Soap, a tax of 3,867,0001.; of this tzvi two-thirds fell upon the . Agricultural interests, making a sum of 2,1'4)0,001. ; this' sum . must, of course, come into the cost of produce. Add to this ' the present enormous Poops' Rate ; that rate, according to tfie l . return's :of 1820-, amounted to 7,500.0001. Of • this sum 6,600.0001. were paid by the land, taking the reditctions• caused. by the fall of prices, in this rate, the land was-nbw loaded with 5.000001. of Peers' , Rate. The taxes paid upon • the same articles, for reasons which he should afterwards • ex- . plain, amounted to 3 . 1,5941. upon leather. He should propow • a reduction of a great portion of- these taxes in En'gland, and . the sooner the better for England ; and, he would add, tor . - land also. The Hon. Member. proceeded to shew tharth., quantity of corn Produced in Ireland, and imported here, du pred the English farrier; while, by encouraging the -cultiva tion of grain, it must also injure Ireland in the event of : any cessation of demand for that commodity. It had been said-that • any check to the cultivation of Ireland would be productive of .. mischief. In his opinion, it was to the system practised in that country, that their distresses were owing.,. They were reduced to so low a state that:they could not fall lower. If the whole . country was like a garden, if all its fields were full of corn, still - they must . be distressed and unhappy, until a change of system • took place. 'He begged the attention of the House for a few moments, and he should shew that the reductions which he pito posed could be effected without touching the inking ''lints, or' any . existing establishment. He went en to thew,. that from the increase in the revenue, as 'it ell as from • other saving ,;•.• which had - been premised, they might with great , 4afety >o= duce the taxes to the amount of 3,2C.0,(T01. In . 1808,' the on Foreign Brandy and Geneva amounted to 12s. 7d. peit4-. lon.. The quantity then imported. was- 2,600,000 ing a revenue- of 2,000,0001: a year to the country: - In •ItElo,'-' ~ 7