The Sun. — London, England, 1811-02-08 00:00:00

~., ~~. ~~~.. x~.: ~ ereland for the purpose, eied I now offer them again, • tne observation, that they do not contain one iee dred'h part of the atrocities which I could prove :o:,Ainst this man. I have, however, sufficient for 114. purpose. Here they are, sworn , . before the Je iges of Ireland by honest men. I press• them tipun the Court neither with presumption nor per tinacity, and I quote the case of Colonel Draper to support me. Not one word has been said to over throw that caste Colonel Draper was allowed to prove every word, and he wa held to bail. Col. Draper Milled false 'affidavits; yet they were. heard ; he offered trreli;:vatit stfidavits, yet they were not in terrepteth I hcre offer true and relevant affidavits, and I demand equal justice. I refer your Lordillips to no Statute which you may construe at your dis cretion. I produce to you no dicta of those el l e have prccehet yen, and by .whom you are not bound ; bur I quote te you your owe wise, ine. deft); uncoetredided ad, in a case which occurred am years since If. any thing were wanting to prove the vice malignity with' which my enemy has FersCrUted roe, I have merely to mention, that on the very day ',when. this. Court were pt - otrAOing my appearance on aCount of ill-1100th, the Attorney ut my :erosecutor was seeking rite out, leading me with the foulest, falsest obloquy, and endeavouring to drag env from my :bed of sickliest; to my dungeon. illince 'in eittidaVits . eauree, .he read, let ibis tact reeve's -I persecution I have . eu&red. ThieCotitte.--Sincre you 'ewe no proper affida vits to produce, you may now speak on' any topics you I hiekeelevae . • Ir. I! rii " .\ HT ; let the Ateg'ney-Gene tal begin I choose to have the ptivilegie of replying to him` , e • • AstottOav-Gtovenee...--Noe in tire case of the Kieg,sgainst Budd, it was ruled that whs're no ' &Bidet its wets` produced either 04 the part of the prosecittien or defence, the defendant -ware feett to seeak in mitigation, and, the prosecutor tee answer him. Mr.' FtNNtial . l.--- , Cert:iinly, Lord Kenyon ruled it se'e but I ehould titl;;poSe that your Lordships will preter the precedent which yen have youreelies es tablished. "allude to the case' of Draper, where 'Mr. (yarrow; and Mi. Nolan, 1 believe, spoke first for the presecetion, and then Mr. Serjeint Best rose for the Atli raiz e,. in reply, when the buginess ended hyDraperleheieg held to bail. I shall rest on Dra per's case unt;l it be controverted. Mr. erkgßOW.- -- As there is nothing for the pro secutor teierpealeateon but t lie. in formation, of course it must follow that the defeedant 0,001 first speak, sir else whifiein the proseeutorivive to reply to ? 'flee Coots .—As to Draper's came, scene larity may have vele. in, perhaps train the 'Offer erect! Conneel e . or some other cause; but we cannot Niter that irregularity to contravene esta l';ilished:usage. • Mreettereeie-7,1e Lord, the rtile, as quoted by the AttoreiejeGeor ral, only applies to cases !Wge no adishiviis were produced. Here two, timst: it Power &Ind Lips(N K. O ! : The Couß te—No, oe iee part of the pro secutii n. M r. Firmer( y, now proceed. • • Mr. FINNi:RTY."--1 ant welt aware, my Lords, of the mans disadvaetages ender whichl I stand this day.; Got of eone ate I more s-usible theft having •tieltauely ..quared my conduct by a necitiol . , winch until wee net e ,I eltr, his bt."et) s sudden y rejeeted, also the misfertuee to have the swore tests } which I have eirtatel, refused ; and to hear ogea made against me which it is not allowed to to rebut. I ceelion indeed, detige What the Ai • rev-Getter:ll may offer foreles 'bent. Perhaps, .ite its expedieets, he may declaie ills innocence. ibis he will but follow the ex tenet: of the Noble Lied hinrielf, who ivrey &dere& in his place in Parliament, that there was no torture infii-,',led in / r o o d. 'such an ( Area had this hardy 'and onblinh. i. declaration, th to I well remember, when Mr. aelles wee defending the tortures of Nieto') in Trini- A ided, on theoprecedent of those infheed in Iteland, / elle Judge stepped lino, by the assettion, that there :eves pirelidunent inflicted in thet country bet by Court-neirtiale Lt iii not for me, however, to anti eipate4 hat may be his defeoce—eufficient will it be for me ill repel ;Iccosation. What are the crimes of With It I am act used I am'accused of being op. pressed, and net subinitting--nf beihg slandered, and elegising film who traduced me—of acting on the test law, which God and nature have im,platileil its the heatt of man, that of self-preservation I Is this to be deemed a Crime ? Good God, are we come to such a ceisis, that itt this hod of treedom, the ty rant may torture us, amid we are not to ,turn--the slanderer truly assail us, and we are not to oppehei— the persec „f or may. vague us, and we are not to resist him I Are we, when oppressed, and spurned', and trampled Do, to be &Meet the last tefuge of ? I ask this dey no indulgence, I supplicate noinercy. Give me an impartial hear ing, a patient attention, pure and unmixed justice. justice, my leirds, is consistent and compatible with freedom : mile, tolerant, and uribiaeted, site seeks but the eienr and candel truth, tea produce a decision consonant to her character. Give me to-day that jesltee, and I wall hire epptehenseen You hee me here oppressed, hue innoteitt—tespeetful, but ei elaueted—revLeentiel to this Court, but not re trite" of my eharacter---aed supported, under all my difficulties, by the conviction that a British Hall Jestiee is the Lee place s I" re apprehension should enter, It may be asked net ears,. if I am innocent, e e e I e ee e iraw my plea ? I will rrli your Lordships : V 1 ; 1y early io this proseetnitiii heard the Bench declare, that any evident:is of the troth which I sotsald offer cent's' riot exteutiate . 'ray guilt. That; they eaid, was law. Flew then, I was, an innocent oven, without the right' to prose my ilinoCellee;-- ,Wieit was I to do; Surely, not to nepose, the au. thorny of this Court, and trust to the simple state ment of an enlettered individual like myself; to cotn. lee it with a July. No, l,bad no such presumption. I e noeent, then, as I wes, I allowed juegtuent to go by default, he it seenie, the vain hope, that that truth w hich weld not ward off a verdict, might fedi ninieete a punishment.. I 'supplicate no merce- 7 .1 coefess no guilt. I know Lord Csetlereegh too e ell, and resped myself toe much, to supplicate his cletneoey, If I had traduced him, I should apo *eve, ; and even still in the prison to which I seen ‘G sent, it it cae t e iniiVed to me that I levy titteren one syllable of falsehood, I shall make atonement ; for I dislike no human being so much as to (flare. Bard the truth. But J li d ive little idea of ever being uudecelvedi: fiere are bill= me the hors id testi monies of his atrocity—hie are the speaking prdofs which Sullied 'him in Ireland--here Are the records which, if read thk, day, would present such cruelties as never before branded the barbarism of the most unctvitiied nations. The-Court here interfered, and told the defendent he was proceeding irregularly. . . • Mr. FINS HT da not come here uninformed on this subject. I have examined and digested it. I have traced - it from its vicious author, who hoped, vainly hoped, by , iis invention to shield his Memory from tie oblpquy it merited. '['he result of my re seart:h his bran, that tie law of libel is the will 01 the Jodge If the At tUrnry-General presented a hriok for proseeution, and the Bench► nice said it ',was'a libel, utider the present law the Jury roust find it so. No matter whether the person libelled be Moo-- cent or guilty, be who accuses him must be con victed. In the words of Sir 'l'. Mallett " libelling against a common strumpet is as great an offence as against an honest WOOl3ll, and perhaps more danger ous to the breach of the peace ; for ai the woman said, she should never grieve to be told of her red nose it 6heliad •not one in reality.'! Lord Castle reagh 'has pretended a most violent • regard tor ills Character. But [tow ludicrous is this delicacy ! See, it he.had proceeded against me by information, he might have sworn my statement was falo,e ; if he bled proi:eeded by action, I- might have sworn it vs as treks : but no, be chooses to proceed -criminally, where neither can take place ; end this he callq vindication of his chancier :Celt me, my Lords, .does such a course proccedi froth soften nun or re . sew went ? Sir Stmotst LE ELANC.—Nou are travtThiog quite out of the road. Mr. 441iEltTY.".+I atil..not deviating from the law. Lord ELLENBUROUGH.—Sir, unless you take the warniog whiat has been 'so repeatedly ven yon - , the Court must let its justice overcome its com pa4sion. Mr. RNNERTY..--1f you think , this prosecution has, br.'en instituted to clear Lord Castlereagh, of course you will allow me to clear mySelf by probing his guilt. . " 'Lord ELLENBOROUGII,...-No the prosecution has been brought to satisfy the justice of the coun,uy by the prevention of libels. , Mr. FINYERTY.—Lord Castlereagh is anxious for his character, and so am 1 for mine. I 1 . 10 to escape, and am Ito be . li'aellptl ith impunity ? I know well qmie have been even ret,sarilud •for ii : but the ea lumnies.of bad men ‘c pass by me as the idle wind which I regard oot."—I have never spoke against the truth, but 1 have opposed oppression ;—there is my crime, have advocated retorm—the principle wit;ch gave Chatham immortality, and his. son , ower ; which has given Whitbread, Sieridati; and Burdett, the confidence of the nation—which makes that nation' look up to the Prince formeasurea, in which I trust and hope he may not disappoint them. I have advocated innocence, and, in so doing I have transgressed a law which ne human being can asier tali) No man can charge the with a sinister view in doing so. 1' trust I shot! hear no accts aionof "ba loom" ie against as it was against another individual in this Court ; a strange accusa tion to conle (rem hits, forsooth, who never opens his mouth without a tee. '1 know a prejudice'is excited against those who attack men in . porer,; but - do not they Boinctitnes deserte it ? Do you not remember how James, Coke, and that wicked Bacon, then Attotney-General,.conipitedigamst an innocent individual 1 Do you eot remember the monster Jetteri i es - ? But, thank God, 'the record of his punishment has accompanied the record of his guilt ; let it be a sacred admonition to all who are weak and wicked enough to prefer the transient favour of a Court to the pure and beauteous permanency , of virtue Yet what was Jefferies to— .But, my Lott's, I check mySelf. Lord Kenyon says, a libeller has no right to complain when libelled ; as sound doctrine as ever he pro mulgated. You will not deny it, my Lords : if so, then you will riot punish me, for you cannot pu-' nish the censor of him who has 'wasted the trea sure of the people, and the blood of bis species.— . When this man was sending out the greatest Ex pedition which ever sailed from England, how was he employed in watching me. Better would it have been if he had been sending bark to the fine soldiers he sent to perish, and whom I saw dying for want of it. But why did I go to 'Wills cheren ? Simply at the request of Sir Home Pop, ham, whose letter I have in my. hand, requesting Me to give a narrative of the Expedition. Lord Castlei,eagh prevented me ; and, besides my persooril injuries, occasioned trio a pecuniary loss of near 6001. The AtiornerGeneral chose to say' I was unfit.— " Ufit !" phrase is something in the style of Sterne's illuendo ; any man may fill it up as he pleases. Why Was I Until( 1 defy the Attorney-General to answer toe in any other way, titan that he wanted to prejudice the public mind against me. 'The CUURT.—Why, you are hardly tittering a syllable which is not libellous. We shall certainly remand you. Mr.tFistmtvt.----I was in this Conn when Gil bert Wakefield was heard, without interruptioe, fur three hours ; but if you do ,not choose to hear Inc, of course I must desist. The COUKT,—We wish to hear you, if you are not iockeolous. Mr. FatNe.P.Tv.--Well, then, since this topic ;s displeasin,;, I shall have recourse io,,anotber which may prove snore palatable. I have sworn:in' my , attidaviis that every thing with which I havecharg ed C :bile: - t .:01, in Ireland, is true. Couvr.--That is not in evidence. MI. FIN NBitTY..-,..See IV what a state your Lot& ships have reduced rue. You tidit say, when I offer yen evidence, you will not receive it ; and, then, when I refer to a point, yol turn round and tell use, it is nut in evidence ! Shall I be at liber:y to proxeCti ? COVIITe..--Not in this way. Mr. FINN KitTY.—Every thing I have stated is (rut% l 'had no tidier propecti , n , . Ail ai tivuaglinst Lon.l CasticAtugh, was tout', could tuil succeed ; and so in order to shield: myself from his cool and cautious catritnny, could only have re `course ,to the press,, 1 now come to the case of Orr. The Attorney General bal . :. said,' that Lord Yelverton refu,cd to z..commend Mr. Orr to mercy-- The Courm—You cannot proceed on that topic. Mr Ft NNEWrY.--7i ii.ll)pOS6 I sh.lll have the same indulgence which was given to Mr. Wikefield fiord ELlANsottouoit did nut knoW what Mr. G. Wakefield might, have utietcd during those three hour., but it it wa,.as irrelevant as wl►at !he defefid int was now uttering, he hoped the Court interfered to suppress it. • MI. FINNFATT asked to IA Nit other vindication of his chaster he eoull have, resorted, than the one which he adopt , ;d? He applied to Counsel, on the subject .of bringing an netii•n against Lord ,Casile reagh, who advised hitti - from the measule. But, after the publication of theordei fUr his return home, he was asked by every, person he noel, whether he meant to submit to havelnputed to him the trea sonable views w Itch that order suggested ? He therefore wrote his appeal to the public, Was it passible that that order couid originate in any 1 1 .1ilig . but the ill. will of Lord Castlereagh ?. its the defendant. to sacrifice his o'.vn feetin,, , , to preserve his Lordship's ? was a nii,deineanour, it - - asmuch as it tendtit to breot u t the peace ; the defendant hoped, therefure, that it would not he vi sited with more st:veny thew a due.l or manslau4ll - which were Utnally breaches of the peace. The defendant ;tided to a statute of the reign of Philip and by, v, filch , libvi was punished by a fine of Wlit. and an impt isbnmeot of a, mom ; and to an other statute of Elizabeth, hi taliich sitnitir light Punishinent W,P4 s intlit4ed upon libel. He was aWille, howeter, that there vivre precedents of puoishing . libel by slitting the nose, Bien by death. Lot there was one precedent established by the pres:Ait Court upon which he patticittarly stood. It yeas the case of Mr. Heriot, who was found gn:lty-of a libel in the Sun newspaper upon Lord SC. Vincent, accus ing Licit nf - having neglected to send intelligence of the corninenceinent of war sO our colonial posses sions. 11 , 4 . was a seditious libel ; the present de• fendant!s was not—that libel was hist! ; his was true ; Lord St. Vinicent had t ever given Mr. Heriot any Castlereagh hi& bent the whole ftarce of his hostility upon "the defendant ;. the per son lib,dlo thete was a wan, the brilliancy of whose naval Charat.:.ter, splendid as it was, Wits thrown com paratively iii lite shade by the trapocendant excel letice of his political charatter- . —the person alleged to be libelled h e re was Lord Castlereagh ! A n d yet Mr. Heriot was punished only whil six months iwprisonment, and then discharged, without fine or bail. The defendant also adVerted to the case of Colonel Draper, who was pun;shed with • only six months iMprisonment; and to the case of Mr. Blag don, who was punished only with that extent of imprisonment' for a libel also on Lard St. Vin cent. Mr. FINNERTY proceeded to sta , c, that in come quence of the part which he had taken in the Mitt• dtesex elettioris of I snyan'dlBo-1, he had the. misfor tune to make the Nlagistrates of that county his cue:. mien. There was a particular s pr;sott under their confront ; and it would be dva h to` him to be sent thither.' He teouid gather be disposed of as Boone parte disposed of I'alm, the bookseller, than be sent to the Coldbath-fields Prison. lit: closed it‘lth the .r full as , ,nrance, that the Conn wotdd .alwa)s tecol lect the Maxim of Blackstone; that next to the sa tisfaction Of justice, a Judge ought to look to the smisfictiun of the qu , ited a decision of GlielJystirel4e, who refused a . tno:ion for an in• formationagairyt a mart Who advertked to can:ion the public not to trust liis tti iltt upon his cr!'dit, upon the go;uod that the man had nu oilier 'owe ut ob• wining redress. If this man could not he prosecuted fonfiu . ri, he could not • be. punished. . &leo dant applied this case to his own and, said, that to accuse Lord Castlereagh Was the only way in which he could justify ,himself. tle' also Owed thecase . of Ow Abbot of St. Alban's, who wanted to ptiniSh a win for cornp!ainiog that be had 'made him a cockoki, Just sf, would Lord Ctistlereagh punish the defendant, for 'complaining' that his Lordship had called him a traitor. Mr. Finnerty then read some extras from Lord Erskine's.speecties, which the Court would al )w to be of nu authority, as th e y were m the ere dicta of an advocate. He declared that he bad no inters. tion to write a libel if it were told hitn, he was bound to .know what was a libel, he would reply, that surely' an individital[unprufessional and nn_ educated as he was, might be alle‘kd nut to under stand a science which bad divided the most learned judges of the country. The Noble and Learned Judge , on the • Bench, aad the Attoruey,Genetal, differed as to what was a libel in Mr. l'e.nry's late case; and surely the law of libel was one to which the maxim of isizoranfia legis iron excuse, "did not apply. It the record of a severe punishment upon the defendant were handed down to posterity, ac coMpanied with the slightest biographieal sketch of Lord Castlereagh, would net the reader exclaim, What must, have been the state of th •se jaWb under which an individual was punished for com plaining of oppression ?" The eye of Eqgland, in terested in every • thing which was done by that Court, especially with what related to the law of libel and: the freedorn of the press, and ,pre-enti-, newly the eye and heart of the defendant's native land (Ireland), he had the satisfaction to know were turned with the greatest anxiety to the tesult of that day* 6 judgment. Bet it night be said, dm this was not a controvetsy between Lola Cdstlereagh and the def t idant : the breach of the' peace, the vlol,ltion of the law," were the objects of the indict ment. The defendant knew not in Wbat parr of the country the peace would be broken on beh'alf of Lord Cas,lereagh's charatter ; for upon ilLit subjtd every body was of one mind. Wh ti the delendant had said thronghout the libel, ankthat day, he was ready to prove. He hoped adhered to h.s promise of saying nothing otiensfve to the bights, Ministers of the I,lw in targlaud, as h e reprdett Court : to be. hail iet,i!ei,-,1 an inadmissible offici A rit, it conf:.ined nor a singly : at. n i , tut Owe w. , s pre, d. Lit for in Co!, Drai.o's c..se ; and k s , bad 'Lit Orfli tible to in,ded to tht; a the Court, it teas oily Of Hating gselby eensnc':irl alt 31.1p,tiiiiIiiiire'litigptoer‘tve.iliennt 1: d fr i o re l l a ion l s itfi w cu er i e tY . _bit of speaking the sentiment; of a free O ral ° , should only have incurred the contempt of °C i d i had he abandon that language now; a ll o would rather meet the severest punishment w it , it was in the power of the Court to infliAiii iia lii bour under the degralation of bthig is hypocrite. hypocrite. The whole 01 the case viag L" - . Court ; they would retolle6l the nature ol lc; vocation ; they would read the libel, and " LI/ ‘ i , s,s s iee i b d :o n :a., , e r ttdio ‘ , v inl l ip_ r s e u t su l tul t i e inss e t , :i i inp l egen t sn i t t c a oe t ons: were true, the defeuth ilt o l of his Subsistence, depetid i c a i t s i t o l t i t u e i g ° l v , s e t o s t rr .O l y s tf c it r i e l o itlieP° : P i l l ;f i ii.,.. , cilltiotli:liyiesxehtx,ilelieartitllitgoetuis,ci.tilliarHii.ezrembh,os;s!eid: and i shou ld ll,.ugli 6 :, PP vi - irtjl , ' r:.atb igl,i ti e ttii,.. c :et o cd.d n i fi ib u , :d l,..e lu in t g lie p d ro u v u ez ,-e d, on as of be D o lo il n::::::: SI: , a ,si i ,i t i t : id ,.tAiti lt a i b s i c e o:aVict . ion that o tti bi} : ,i ' eeLai t titd l o, t oe e eifillci t b, i ii% r i : io u lail s ,flii :e ancit a c tihni u N u t il , i i o t Y i ti. G de E e i p E e r u e l A i o a L r d i t i l l i e e a n a t r )d d r : l i sle : l l7,t l ' ll: e: i l;; P principle euefrulte,dokunte..esrwioreiaciffs: thou , h ,le WoUld tsllained a deliberate ciesp-ii in:Aniiesten ° ° O .", P the etibrication of the lic.el as in the tle ic l ‘Ct# Ptrit's et iolos, to run the elimader of Lor" i 0 reol : - . h- - te r. prChtlit him ay :} li)oostrr ef 1 i e fr4 o ?" 1114 ‘lgantst los ov.ll perteo kn: Pd ,; ' '' l' i t''' i s t: l iia : i i i t ti l : ): l ; :i\ ti iiiid a )ar i c i t ) . : ll i :: :: : : (l74j ti c ; B;is_ b !i t i : e t arie i i t d.f", ‘ .y i,i i : i s tie s iit,i t ‘1 1 ,1 1 ,01 1: 0 1 , i tc; - :iii ( 01 0 6 31, I:7tiliot.iitt'tesrie.eetriinigg' Itb)::::0 ir • Ihe Attorney•GeLeral Woolu n -t :: 1 1 Y 0Pr.,,,, tifirdtalunllierlitte::.::idist:2l•l jut:lrel:llr.ltsdews‘ea:hdlocl4;siiireid'ciet;‘lsl.:ll:eo:r;s::slit'vbcil.:l::::°‘l‘:!: - s t t : l l .l : ( l L l ! )ae n tic . d,itel' : 4 1 : : : : :i l u yi 'l l,d 1 1- :t a : tn ' e l t 4 ),ti a li u l l ' a e t c l da tol: t r s a lel s a ttf ot " r i d e t lai l y i b l e e e a rc c o r t l y r e l i r e .iwi a ll ° s h f u i it : i t : 1 1 : 1 d : : 4 ::1 1 ! eo.o r ri :: h i. : ' ' ''H laustle . k i l in• 1797. - Was there any thing 'lOO re t ""dtd to held so high, than that the 0 111r4 ,, 0 cleeeney attd good manners, sl.oulkl be t g l l lki' f . r . orn his im ‘ r V d i s l l a ii t p u o t ri 'd the ti li 'e e d n e c i l e i n c ti le aliwiunt°utt . hie e d , l e' e x Magistrates ? The defimdant desloid I...ad , liip nut to send hitt) to any priben i n , t oy tcbs'll'ilit;:Lr- til:ei'ellkl about l'a'at vetBw't : .°l' l : ; talli a .:ota t d:hi s 'i:He t esE l et m aribnidaegt i all'ellitis i e:t s il l :l°lgl r edel i nse t oMa i ad o rv*lsea n hi 'l' defendant s itelnoltdehof aifaheil.sitixti thelllB3kbi; 11 ;it ':':::svC1:?::::::111. 'l:tilii‘ II ri:n1:1:111‘141j11:r51:11; ILIA 0)0 . 4 was no one Magistrate 11 ' 6° 1 ° 00' 61 ei.Ong!l to attempt th is ill-treatment ;or I L o t 1 01 ' w.v'eitriel,ret repeating would never b.: foetid to c''',l o Ce The Attorney-General did not troohh!.`,::ol° i ., „031 4 . ' ll t ::: l :l i i : ti t % i i: : t4si: t :tl i 'l t C'e't'l :t lxcl::t o e'r ; 'et'ftil t aowa l t l rtt e al:l°gtellill t len 't e.l r :li : et:l) i t t tr r te; ,. elil%.hll;le : .lli v oie:n:li i tda' r rli'. O lgaAe) : °iliiittglie'% :'' lvCS°ll:lar i :' ' 'ltl( e ::‘)6et l tlc:ill.l')°'li'l::lU.':ilii'lj;:' ii‘Villei:"liill g inil°rl a l!lilllb°l(4ll'll:ri'' Upon to ntr , wer for wrongs, . took ndvAnni-0:011 iris always shewn-by the Culla I ? ro olti, j ° situation, to more than doub : e 'hoe '' not, I7i, charges ten thousand times more i ni* ', aj o ri / 1 those fer the preferment of which II" '''', ; t i J ,o 1 71 ,74 ")dictcd.. And who was.aie person ' : j . to ' l O hintsef upon this eminence, With re0, 1 1,110 1 ,' at:: line"ll.ll2l::•:dri:t°olgir:l)l.wi?tlaßtry,eiltilinstdhc:aWtoncfoaauc'Plci;toirPuye'r:rtcc:ifillivill;,fcti).P:;) ett i~et i : 1 : :: E: rti 1 : 1 1 ) : : n 1 1 : 1 I d ee0A p .. t ! is i t, t. ) : : : eu r s ' ita: N t:?a ri eut o )ryj a ... o G.h i g ' ci N : sna i A t i l dt t e O r r : p re , di replied, r t i t ia: l i d ) :::;: c .'1 ; of pr eve nting the A.ttorne -G . eral ,troi ll°' y tn 1 1° lad. asserted was .stated in - the f libel , ti ii c i' 3:s ti t r i c t ll 4 lo ' ; the Learned Cotinsel confessed that the C 1 ( ;bel , t f right to confine him tO the letter of Ihe 00,14 desirtql it might be remembered, OA °l l i ewt o'4 ()T*(; the detetid,iut uttered was the fi ) " - ile C'l,ll [hal ever tell from the mouth of tioni,,, c orld,',f upon h s L or d s hi p t o reme mber how I - i i i eil himself toward s hi s p rosecu tor, and IV` v j t tl j ° ~if n b ey -General concluded himself, and (° tirij il .Pi etueen them. He had the defenJantosotird i awn statement a convided libeller in 111 :0:3 ; 0 Court had now sbewo himself a libelle r ?,Iy, 14v i $ 01Jft which then convided hira. ' ti. , - o' o 0 lie planted himself in the late fospedit'V.tllll.lol Circumstance of his Weiner been 8 6()11 , V : 0 1 APO/ would of itself suggest the - 04:1 ) . 1 i ti such a person 10 acc.inipany th at 'F.%r- 0 ' op , ' , should an individuaL because lie nlitol)l,oiecr:,' d tr tl.7ll ) ); t tl t i ) i i i:e l,iB w o h w o .u h l u a d ni t e h ' e d t a tt r a e n t ;g o % : : ::v'll: Pellition, when they though: . tit 0.1 ''''',', ' l i . P, r "h4 ) it, his teinaining ill tlicil LH I I I II) : . .I'''., s a h lhi L t t li l i tt :: ei v r : 4, l lte e i t l ic r t, : :i t t ln . joi l te i l be l. : lrni : P I eo , e tarl tio st i , i t m r i t l l o) t e t rt l e j t si i i ; . : o l i t y ri u d :: . t jc b ‘ a, a: s t n i t l ie e i e i n b if , e : s : ci , :::7: l l -" , . : .1 'd ,1 :: ' ,i ' : : 1 ' ,, - , ,, ,.. 1 1 ' ; : . , : : : , ; .1 any thipg in thirt conduct but the eV ; `?..)11 1 1 11 ',1 ' 0, 1 of it at mice? l'lle Attorney - Ge'''', : ' ' to!' ; ;"' be . ond, , e.rstOod as c,tuid.iining of 1 ,''' ''''vv "i 0 t iii t;P i i:: : l, c Li ii i l e n c i t o e s t ei enc 6 b l e a t rl V l t t " :1 1 1 1 :a ' n u ; „Itil.°4l)lrtilGt i*gti::‘,llt.l:6;l;:a'Clili 11~lif; ' 07 611 14-: bcgin a sentence, the .C4sc t n a vel ticipate how it would eon. but ilw I‘, e' id 4 ' 114' , fier iii ealitji upon the Court to Visit t h , e Vi u ,• l o o lnunnt's :it 114 e defenstant's putti.bavn".9 ipir dress lid 1, ,, rd Caitlereagb , for the g r0) .,0 t o ov i ' a d reev'ved th.it oar, unless, tak' l ;iL, Co llll ,i o , -cu ti ) stotice 4 into their c onbidentlio u, ," l ,i i cil 4 r l g„ t F it r. ,i ) , i ii, s l :: ,c s et , ~ ,t t ,rt.i, .11 .: : :: ,,, la I, The. : L l: o ible f i d lodu C t ; tf a: li t el l dg e t rio l :'i l l i :, i i , ~,"1;1 1 4 ,..: :L dtel 1, i ' ll ' ii i ld : 00 1 ; "Ited Ow 0.„ , re,! of malignity wil . ', cl) a nd P l3 , ll , 3 l' '' e 1 " 1 ' 7 ,.eY Genial was "t‘ ell perstpd-'" tilt de " "" ""t toll , t•Aed that advice; for na , (I tit tor, the liar w,mid halt' advised tae defe'" ) : l . 00.ifti !lie , c.-ttdvicr t.' it:tri that dii'y Ptn' ; stt : 1;0 0 I was oat well t.)a would boa told Ihri- t ' {