The Sun. — London, England, 1811-01-19 00:00:00

. . . . . a ' a nd It's ltlj . e - s.ty,ouglit, not to iiumher of that body, : 1' m 4! tiloex.s who. were be autliori.iid to n.o.minate.t le . , , ~., 'to enter on the inVeStiga.ien. ; : .,. 1 , c. . 1.1 , ~ u'Ea.,.,cornpii. The Ctiac,. a t.t.On " o .t. 111 e. tit'eman aAth. iiii and merited 'the :It'ght. 1-169. 'candid niatuir in which Ql;u.hd,. I ..the elanse itself bronght . hts objec tions forward`, lii the Ininc!P.e,9 .. -t.;_. _.1,.., the k 1 i i'''a' gie c , i t • . 1 ( wits in ortsri d:coulnilViviecre they Majesty and four .or 11 )( * "r , e; 6 , ,'.-• • - .'nf opinion his' Majesty was Icat.)..ableto,toreihsnym.i.,o.lgloluhide eiercise of the 11:oval . ..A nt . k ll l i ty! .1) repor t 'that opinion to , bon) such re theltegent.i3O w w ho should un mediafely call a Privy CoOncill d The 11.1gh lion. (n't w's to be Cgivin"ic:i ' st: ~ p *v Conneif not tentlerrian had cehipla ned of tin. 1 . 1 y ,ritii the tact, being posSessed of authority to itiquirenini,...... d, ue but Ile had tOobsetve,llti: pion w4g.rc...c°rie registering the nt a. means of .recordi.ng, and ef , i teport ot t4eQueeil'6' cou,tici!.. They g were merely elm, t &the public the roviding thi.., ine . ans of annif).l.4n --, . 1t lo be given rocoiery ot Ir,,King. Every.facility gl ()-11--ed would be 'for. doing so, .arid : 1 this' oe Leas ci , tivin H Onourabie 'felt by Do one inure; than the Might Gentleman opposite. 1 . 11‘..y 'Were then to decide ou s me the the mode' in which tho King should ' re 9 Wreng, Itoyal 'power. As the . King conk! do n f o nd. mime wher King porson must be ,ett.t.le „ri,lyt itraa therefore thought proper that six of" ..1 r 'Council should tlke npoti themselves the te t s o pol d is is i : bility ot devilling his Kijesty competent e lernbets charge the fundiolis of nasally. Tne.s - s ledg. et the Privy Council wtre lo he re g ,11 4 e ,,,1• : 36 ,V wa,, log tlicrmitlyes to the people, that 1114 LY,aaiehOr.. ,s 4; Capable of again ailtninistetiil3 the,G9Verl/I"9'.uch the entanhy. It was. certain that there ) shoul d b e. tbitie form laid (I,,wti tor the. resumption of Rev./ lo t .• err the part of 'his Mljest'y, but that form ough t . hi be be' thJ must' si;ople api easiythat e ptlldPos•it- Y devisi.l. Upoti the. whole, the provis:o n bit stoo waif. in his opinieit,- as uttex,,:epii:Jnale as i t ' totid-b ' . ' i‘lr.bitti:lLlnAti Spoke in e . I planation of. what he had before anVaticed..--Ttie que,tiott was then ;put, ' 'Dna Ilie Eimendineot carried. hir/ Mettits-proped ao ad..itional precautionary tes(Nitit '6ll/2. r Chi:Cltiten'S Council, by intronucuig certain ,words .ont.tuted in, the originat Bill.' , ~, ' Tin.: .c:11.1(3.1.1.„1, or thy, ExoftLavEr.: •hou 11 obicoloir, tii the. prof4set.l Amendment, aid th e ds preposed by Mr. MU'rriS .were according; .. " 1 " trodticed. • '''. llle-Teniaitting:clauses wi re gunk iII ro'lg " with' I' ''''°llt ti, p oi 'The hliin ~- up of thu clause.retai "Pg t() 'die Peti.:ltioi avic s;,llarieS c ' h olgeithl° on the '• Privy Purse w:IS post pp'. betl,, at the suggestion of the -Cliaocellor el tile E,xciiLipier, till th:... Itepott of th e • Sec Jet Coni,,thfee, bhUllid be itceiv(...i. rile biaok 1,1 1 kr the. Trustc,:es of fits Majesty's . pri,iiit.t.,e,, prop,.,rty wits fitted np ,k% it': : . t he . se . °f ate Slyeett antla he Keepe i ' of t Le P'riv v ,Purse. . '" jrtilitet • - " ' '' • oVed the ~, . . tANChiLtilt of the ExchhQUEh ill 'S4IiSSIOU 61 b. cerli ( :4-11)4s; to iii.sko way fqr ocr(a'" , . ~,.. .. ... :0 .and it r,,,,,i011 roi ; 2, the Regent to. sub.. RI Ih.lo Auc 1);1-:,..d iti tilt; au i ti year. of .Charles. Al. tor the mote ,•tt,,:.,..-tually .11-6t:tvi!) lire rights °I. ' [tie },;.11K. . , CliANcti.L.)( of the L t cit enu pit brought ,in , 4 Vilti,' eilt.e,gl og toe Dr.oi s of ~ioroir.slty, t" . ll,' 13,-011 I.lki Ile;elit i(i .4 • iheln a5'i11.....v A'rr', 1)1)11,"1 'i.he 1i.1.0g iii.wit'd ki.;ry Li.,e, tititi'l 1 :. : to rlitt4l. by gi,yitig y p.,rlioAi Ql.the"iii.to 1:.:e eiiPt9r'.. ti46sefs, and '`;',i'P:ying Certa.iri. surns tO the r , ltei of cases ol Lai dships, with I lie itdvike and , apt-ou t oa_ioi :ot: tire. fiords:us !the l'retisury. The clairse w i t, 'car ..... ~hed' wit bout -al-Inns, i inn . . Air: .PoNS'Otiliy•oti3etveci, that th 6 Right Hon. Gflitleillah seetbett"to ( knit the Bill would •xPe" . - fh atce 110 turnier opposition.- In this. he was de : - el 'ed, as he might expeet lire sense: of the House Ay ould be a:.,,ain taken on its merits, on the; bringing de up of the itrport, or oil the third reading: • • lecli::. The CHANCEI4, h ot the ExcnEematt had no ab oti io the sense ot. ihe House beiug - so taken. kiellioWeVer,• presumed, that 'the Flight 1-16P..G‘ln -1,1;441 bad no intention of taking the o f Of the 'louse that night, and he must ,know that theße,- port would be then brought up. lie conceived 11 !non'night be the intention of theitight Hon. '9elltie to take the.. sense of the House on the Report being,taketi into .further consideration. ' The pro" c_eethrigs irt 1 116 otht .House rendered it,unneCessarY for them to rueet on Saturday ; he fore, to propose e 'postponement of 'the': further intended, there colisideraiion of tl . •It 'Nlonda i- availing iiimi,,,, , fire Re p o rt to ~ ), " .11 ol the interval to . get it .prititeo,, a t it • na t th t , h iv ' ' " y e , tat iroo.consideration With greater ease. 4' oNsotvay inti Mated •in intention of takin g the'letise of the lionse'bn the trots further considera:. , of the Report. ~' the tiousti then resumecliwilen urought np the' Report was and ordered -to -be token into 'further c°ltsidersiion on Monday, and to• bepfinteil..Ad t..........._ourned to Monday ..: • Ai IQ( N PE la. Th,.. CONGRESS. It'uSt OP REPRESENTATIVES, DEC. 6. The Rouse resittned the rt ading of the Ducutnen t 9 4CCOrrlpanying the President's Message. 130CUMENT$ ccom PANYING THE Pithst - i)ENT's MkissAGE. ~ IIXT4A.CI‘ OP A. 1. P.TT 4lt PROM MR. MI" T° nit;. PINCKNEY, I)BTED " I)4,Ni-intent of State, fan. 20, 1110* gr I ... n'lny leter to you of the 'Atli November' lilt''a9, you were authorised to assure the British Go. Vertunent, that the Utoied States sincerely retained desire which they have constantly professed to uleilitate a triendly accommodation of all existing '4ll'erencos bet wceti the tile t.WO ountries, and that I!ethittg would bo more agreeable to them than to illi d the successor ot Mr. bck,oit imested with all the ant/unities' necessary to the accomplishment of Bedesirahle an event, and, moreover, that:Ville at ta,intnent ot this objeci though your agency * a I quld t..) considered more expeditious or other tynte prefrdblo, it would.be a course h ighly 'satis- Nt if cr to tile United States. Let aill now charged by t . ile President to transmit e YOtt 014 inclosed' l'tt. sUbjoined, authOrising as tl te resume the negotiations With the Brttish w'vetualent, tlttder the Nil Pit w..r that had been given, severally and jointly, to you and Mr. Munroe t and in yoUr, discussiOns therein, you will be regu lated by the instructions heretofore given to Mr. Munroe and yourself: It is, however, not intended that you should coinAence this degociatiim until requisitesmislaction shall -Inve been made, jn. 111 5 affair of the Chesapeake; and in the adjustment of this case, you wtil• be guided' by the instructions which you have heretofore received from this c 1.3.- partitient in reiwion . ". It is moreover desirable.' that preparatory to a Treaty , upon all the .pOints ot \.differeace between the two countries, an arrangement, should be made_ for the revocation' of the Orders in Council. As it is uncertaiti•whar may' be the. ultimate measures of Conies§ at the Vresent Session,, it• cannot be ex.- pe;led that.the Presidebt can,.3t this time, state the jliciSe condition to be annexed to a repeal of the Orders in Council. But, in general,, you may as sure the British- Government of his cordial disposi tion to exercise any power with which he may be in vested to put. an end , to . Ads -of Congress,• which Would nib, be resorted to • but for the Orders in Council, and.at the same tinie, of his determination lu keep teem in force against . France, in case her Decrees should not'also be repealed." • MC SMITH TO Mils PINOKNRY. " Department of Statc, lan. 20,.181*. • " Sta,- , -The President, anxious to adjust the ex isting differences beti.ve6n the United States and Great Britain, and deeming it expedient to . rnake another effort for that purpose, has given it in charge to.tnu to instruct you .renew negociations in Lon don under the C:ommissinn, dated •1211) •Alay, 1806, arithorisitig Mr. Monroe yourself, se veralty, as well as jointly, " to treat tt,'ith the British Gdvernittent, relative to wrsjogs'conttnitted between the p tios on the high seas, or other water's; and for establishing the principles of -, navigation and commerce between them. " I have the honour to be, " SMITH." MR: SMITH T 9 MR. PINCKNEY. " Department of State, "SI R. : . • • ' May 22, " Your dispatch of the 27th of by the British 'packet, way received on the 1701 9( mouth. • . • " President- lias.:read..xvitli•• surprise and re gret the answers ot „Lord , •IVellesley to your letter ot. the-2d of lannary, and. also -his .ieply to your note requiring...explanations with respect to the blockades of France. The one indicates pan appa rent indifference .as.to. the charader of the diploma= Lie intercourse betwep • the • two countries, and the :•ther e,vitices.,an• inflexible determination to petse liere in their system of blockade. "'lnc prc4,isiou made for the 'diplomatic agency. WitiCli 'is ; to - succyed , that of Mr. Jackson ; Ma n i. tests a dissaiistafilbn. at the step nece,sarily takep here with. regard ..to that r Minister, and at the same time a.. diminution of the - report here. tofore , attached to the diplomatic relations be tweet', the two countries. However pertevering the. .President may be in the conciliatory dispo sition which la:ts :constantly governed Itim,• he cannot. ,be inattentive to such 'an apparent de. parorre• ; from it on the other side, nor• to the, clwy impottd on ,him. by the rules of equality and reciprocity" applicable in such cases. it will be very agreeaole to , him to find that the . provision in question 'is intended merely to afford time for a sa tistactork choice of •a. Plenipntentiary successor to . Mr, Jackson, • and that the mode of carrying . it into effed may be equally uoexceptionable. :But. whilst, from the language of the Marquis Wellesley, with respect to the designation of a Charge d'Atitair4, and from the silence as to any othersuccessor to tlLe re cared Minister, it is left to be interred' that the for mer alone is in contemptation, it. becomes 'proper to ascertain what are the real views of the . , British Go- vernment on the occasion ; and'should . they• be such as they are inferred to , be, to meet them by a corre spondent change in the diplomatic establishment of the United Slates at London. The President relies on your discretion for obtaining the requisite know ledge of _ this snbjeci, in a•manner 'that will do jus tice to the friendly policy which the United States wisli to be reciprocal in,every instance netween the two nations. But in the event of its appearing that the substitution of a Charge d'Affairs fora Nlinister Plenipotentiary is to be a continuance not required or explained by the occadon, and consequently juS tfying the inference drawn. from the letter of Lola Wellesley, the resped which the United States owe to themselves will require' that you. return to .the United States, according to the permission hereby given to the Pt% sideni, leaving charged with the bu , fatless of the Legal on such ,person as you may deem most fit for the trust. With this , view a commis.. slot), as required by a statute of the last sossloo, is hereby enclosed, with a blank for a Secretary of Le gation. But this step you, will not consider yourself' as instrp&ed to take,. in case. you should have cum -4'141u:ed.., with a presi;e4. l l"al a satisfaCtory result, the negociations authorisiA by my letter of the 20th of January. In a letter of the 4th of this month, I trans mitted to .you a copy of the .4.a of: Congress, at their last Seision, concerning the commercial inter course between the United Stites- and Great Britain and France. You will hereith receive another copy of the same A. In the tenni) Section of this statute yod will perceive a new modification of the policy of the United States, and you will let it be understood by the'Britisft Government, that this pro vision will be duly carried into (Vett on the part of the United States. • .1' .A satisfactory adjustment of the Affair of the Chesapeake is very deSirable. The views of the Pre sidenLupon this delicate subject you may collect, net only from the' ustructions heretotbre given' to you, but from the sentiments that had been manifested .on ilie.pah of this Government in the discussion with Mr. lose, and .-frog the terms and Conditions con tained in the arrangement made . with' Mr. Erskine. Vinci conformable with these views, thus to be col!- lected, you will ctunider yourself hereby instructed to negociate and conclude an arrangement with the .British,Government in relation to the attack on the Chesapeake. --1 have the honoUr to be, &c. (Signed) B. SMITH." OR. SMITH TO MR. PENCENNY, "..Department of State, lute , s, Into. " SlA—Your'severil letters of the eth and gth of April, and 2d and 3d of May, have been re ceived. ' • • ", Whilst it was not known on the one hand, how far the French Government would adhere to the apparent import of the condition,' as first communi cates!, on which the Berlin Decree would.berevok ed, and on the other hand, what explanations would be given by the British Government with respztt to its blockades, • prior to that Decree, the course deemed proper to be'taken was that 'pointed out in my !Otter to you of Nov. t 1, and in that to Gen. Armstrong of the Ist of December. The precise and formal declaration since made . by 'the Freneh Government, that the.condition was limited to the blockades of France, or ports of+rance, of a date prior to the kerlui Decree, and the acknowledg ment of` the . British Glvernment of the existence of such blockades, part icelarly that of May, 1 806,with a failure to revoke it, or even to adroit the construc tive extinguishment of it, held in your letter to the Marquis Welles'ey, give to the . suntetta new aspect and a decided Character.. " As the British G o ve rnment had constantly al leged that the Berlin Decree was the origin -1 ag gression on our neutral commerce ; that her Orders in Council were but a retaliation on • that Decree ; and had, moreover,. on that ground asserted an obli gation ba the United States to take etfeetual men- sure against the Decree, ale preliminary to the re peal of the Orders, nothing could be more reason able than to expect, that the condition,: in the shape last presented, would be readily accepted. The Pre sident., ts therefore equally disappointed and dis-atis fled at the abortiveness of e your correspondence with Lord Vellesley_on thieimportaut subject. He en- Pzely approves the determination you took to. resume it with a view to the special and immediate obliga tion. lying on the 'British - Govertmeen to cancel the illegal blockades ; and you are instructed in case the answer to your letter of the 30th of April should not be. satisfactory, to represent to the British Govern mum, in terms temperate but explicit, that toe United States considered themselves authorised by strict and unquestionable, right, as well es supported by the principles heretoforee-applied by Great Britain to the case, in claiming and expecting a revocatiou 0(114.116,gal blockades of Frauce, of a date prior to that of the Berlin Decree, as preparefory to a tuettler demand of the revocation of drat_ Decree:, `t It ought not to be presented, that' the British' Government. in . reply.to such a representation, will contend that a blockade like. that of May, iSuti, from the Elbe to ilrest,' a coast of not less than I,oeo miles, pteclalmed four years since, «ithout hiving been at arty time attempted to be duly exe-, cuted by the application of a naval force, is a block ade conformable to the law of nations, awl eutisist- . ent with the neutral eights. Stich a eretence is' completely barred,- not only 'by . the unanimous eu thorities, both of writers andlreaties on this,point, not excepting 'even British treaties; hut by the rule of bleCkade communicated by that Govern ment to ails, _ in the year 1809, iii which it is laid duwn, that orders have been given not to coneider any blockade of those islands (Martinique eraGia; ttaloupe) is-existing, unless in respect io particular pieta w hich may be actually invested.; and then eye to capture vessels bound to such ports, unless they shall have previously, been warned not to enter them, and that they (the Lords of ,the Admiralty) bad alio sent the necessary directions on the subject to the Judges of the Vice-Admiralty Courts in the West Indies and Atuerica. In this'coinneunication it is expressly stated that the rule to the British Courts of Admiralty was tar nished in' cotisequence.of the. tepresentations made by the Government of the United Slates 'against blockades, not , unlike that now in question, and with the expressioe of rediessing the grievance com plained of, Nor ought it to be presumed' that the British Government will formally resort to the plea that her naval force, although unapplied, is ade quate to the enforcement of the blockade of May, 1806, end that this forms a legal distinction between that and the Berlin Decree o(November following. Were lt adMitted that an adequate force existed, and was applicable to sach a purpose, the absurdity' of confounding the tower to do a thing, with the actually doing- of it, speaks for itself. In the pre sent.case, thteabsurdity is peculiarly striking—a port hleckaded ,by sea, without a ship near it, being a cow:l64lton in terms, as well as a perversion of law and of common sense. From the-language of • Lord Wellesley's two let ters, it is possible he may endeavour to evade the Measure required, by subtle comments on the posture given to the blockade of May, t 806, by the suc ceeding 'order& of 1907. But even twit: lie is met by the case of blockade of Copenhagen and other ja of ZLialand in the year 1808—at a time when these, with all Danish ports, were embraced by these orders of 1807: a proof that, however the orders and blockades maybe regarded es in some resped:s the safue, they are regarded in others atchat ing a dititinet operation, and may Consequently co- exist, vv,ithout being absolutely Merged in, or super seded the one by the other. " In the difficulties w.hich the Britisl'Govern ment must feel in finding a gloss for the exlt-aye gattt principle of her paper blockades, it may per {tees wish to , infer an acquiescence, on the part of this Governmente front , the silence under which they have, in . some instances, passed. ShoUld a di , position to draw such an inference slieW you will be able to meet it by an appeal not only to successful remonstrance in the letter to Mr. Thorn ton, above cited; .but the answer given to Mr. Merry, of June, of the notification of a block- T o e in the year 1806, as a. precise and authentic Ilk cord of the light in which inch -blockades and the e e ee cee e, of them were viewed by the United States; "copies of the answer have been heretutOre forwarded, and another is now inclused,'ai an addi tional preceution against miscarriage. . ‘i Whatever may be the answer to the representa tion and e requisition which you are instructed to ma k e , y ou will traiiiinit it withouttielay to this a:- pal - MIMI. Should it be of .a satisfaelory 'nature, you Will hasten to forward it also to the diplomatic tuuctienaly of the United Siatee at Paris, who will be, instructed to make a proper use of it for °Wining a repeal of-the French D cree and io pro. ceed, currently with you, sive removals by the two Govern:rents of their pre dat dry Edicts. • "favail myself of this occasion to state to you, that it is deemed of great importance that our Mi nisters of Foreign' Courts, I.;nd especially at Paris and London, 'should be kepi, the one by !he other, in formed of the state of otfr 9ffairS at each. " I have the honour, tkc . (Signed) " R, SMITE;.' William Pinckney, Esq..&c. &c. &c. GENERAL ARMSTRONG TO THE DUKE OP CADORE. • Paris, Sept. 7, Igto. Ste—Your Excellency will not think we impor tunate if I should employ the latest moinent's (it my stay in Paris in seeking an explicit declaration on the following points. Ist, 'Has ihe\D ecree o f hi s _ _ Majesty of fhe 23d or March last, enlotiltog, at is lepri,alscraityst the cotnruerce of ti,e United States; on. account of th.;ir 'of non-nitereow 3e , been recalled ? cJ. What will,be the operatio• (on the vessels of the United States) 'of his Atli sty's Decree of July last, forbidding the departure of neu tral ships from ports o( France, unless prnvide4 with Imperial licenses or ship ltenses, merely sub . , . stituted for clearances ; or do they preset ibe - regula • Lions, to he observedby the holders of therm, within , the jurisdi<iion of .the United States ?, Do they confine the permitted intercourse to two point's only of the United States ; and do they enjoin, !hit all the shipments be made ori French account exclu.ivrly it his - Majesty's will, that the seizures made in the rorti n i Spam and other places, on the prin ciples of reprisal, shall become a subjeci of present or future negociatlen between the two Govern- [penis / I neetl not suggest to yotir Ext.elleney the interest both Governments have in the answers that may be given to these ,questions; and how nearly connected they are with the good understanding 'which ought to subsist between them. After the great step lately taken .by his Majesty, towards au accommodation of differences, we are not at liberty to suppose that any new, consideration will arise, which shall either retard,or prevent the adoption of Me3sures" necessary to a full restoration . of the commercial intercourse and frient4 relations of the two powers, I cannot omit 'expres l / 2 ing, on this occasion, the Pense I shall carry with me, of tba many obligations -I am persOnally under to your Excellency, and of the very high consideration .vith which I have the hOnOur to be your most Obedient and humble serVant, " J. ARMSTRONG. 7. . (Signed) THE DUKE OP CADnitE TO GENERAL ARO:IATRONG. • (TRANSLATION.) Paris, Sept. 12, ale. " Six,--I have received your letter of the 7th September. That which I wrote to you - on ;the same day answered the first of the questions you pnt to me. Twill add to : what I had theohonour to 'write w'you, that the Decree of the 2'3401 Malch . . 'lB iGtip which ordered ,reprisals in conseqoenee of the Aft of Congrehos• of the Ist of March, tdi g, wasfrppealed as anon as we were. informed of the repeal Of Non-inters ourie passed agaidSt. France. Oil -pair second question I hasten to declare to you, that American vessels loaded with . merchandize, thn growth of tlie American Provinces, will lie received without ditliculiy in the ports 01 France,' provided they have not surf-red their flag to lose its national character by submilting to the A.s of the BOitsts Council ;. they may in•like manner depart from the ports of France. The Emperor' has to American vessels.' It is the only thigwhiich bas obtained theM. In thk hiS Kieriiy has itittlicied to give a proof, Of the respect he loVes• to' shew the Americans. If he is somewhat dissatisfied that they have not ss yet been able to succeed in causing their • flag to be respected, at least he sees with picasuret that they pre, far from. acknowledging .the tyrannic principles 'of English legislation. The , American vessels which may be loaded on account of French men, or on adeonnt of Americans, will .be admitted into the ports of France. As to the merchandise confiscated, ,it having been, confiscated, as a mea sure of reprisal, the principles of reprisal must be the law in that affair. I have the 'honour to new to you 4 Sir, the assurances of my high con sideration. (Signed) . " CHAMPAGNI, Duke de Cadore." . in a. letter from Mr. Smith to Mr. Pinckney, dated sth July, he says,--" In explaining the ex tent of fepeal required from England, let it. be d;slinaly understood, that it mon necessarily in. elude an annulment of the Blockade of May, 1006, which b identified, with the Orders of Counna, and which is palp ibly at variance with the Laws of Na- tions." He adds, " Without this, the French Go vernment will draw the United States •and Great _Britain to issue, on the legality of the Blockades, by acceding to the Aa of Congress, with a condi. .tion that a Repeal of the Blockades shall,accompany a Repeal of the Orders in Council." Mr. Smith to Mr. Pinckney, July sth and July 17th. Mr. Smith to Mr: Pinckney, Oct 19th.' — These' relate to the repeal of 'the French Decree's i expea the reaciticliog of the British Order's in Coun cil, and a renunciation of paper blockades, which the Administration, 'from London papers,. suspects may not take " 'p lace. • Mr. Pinckney is ordered to .press. on the' British ~Government, that Congress may be induced not .to wait three months for their decision. .Mr. Pinckney is again ordered to return, unless the orders are rescinded; and there is an ex peaation of aceommodation. His stay °rotten) is left to his, owojudgrnent. A letter from Mr. Smith to Mr.' Pinckney, Nov. 15, 'lBlO, in which Mr. Pinckney's keintions are , declared soipended, Unless a Minister by sent front England. The ,tame of .his return is left to his own discretion. Letter from Mr. 'Sniith to General Armsttbng, subsequent to the arrival of the John Adoirs, relating the-,seizure. of American property,, • and expressive Of itutignation at • the coodna of the Duke of Ca‘ dare. Several cat tier letiera from Mr. Smith. Letters from Mr, Pinckney to Mr. Smith. General Armstrong's letters and correspondence with. Cbainpaigny, the crocuments relative to West Fl-rida, and those concerning a misunderstanding with Tunis.