The Sun. — London, England, 1804-02-06 00:00:00

• men. W. Fletcler, of Hclxton, money-scrivener. G. Duncan CroSkey antt R. \Vestal I, of Basinghal st rect, Mackwel I-HAPtaaors. • R. Allcroft, of Sheffield, sciss:ir mann latiurer. Sircoin , of BriStol, looking i,lass InanufaaUrer. I PR. omo T /0 NS To-norrow.] ant by his answer stated, that the bond executed by Simpson was not for the payment of any sum of money, in consideration of hiS being appointed to the command, but that he should resign the com mand of the ship at the end of each voyage if re. quired, and that he should not, interfere in soliciting for, .or appointing to any command in the said ship. That he was entirely ignorant on what terms Simp son was appointed Captain by Mitchell, and that he continued him merely beevse he was in the com mand. He also stated that all accounts between the Plaintiffs and him had been settled and adjust. ed, aml the Charter Party given no and cancelled. He denied that ; Simpson CNC!" paid him 'cool. or 'any other sum of money, as stated in the Bill, but that the same was advanced to him merely as a loan, which he had accordingly repaid, and he stated that lie had appointed the Purser and the other Officers of the ship without any gratuity, fee, or reward whatsoever. - - Captain Simpson, on his examination for the De fendant, positisip!y denied that he ever advanced any sum of money to the Defendant by way of loan, or LORD CHANCELLOR.—" Then I atria opinion that there are circumstances enough in this case to decide against the Defendant, notwithstanding the circumstance of there being, duly one. Witness. Let him Therefore be decreed to pay this money to th e Plaintiffs, with interest thereon while he had it in his hands," ~- r• • LONDON: Printed by BUCHANAN M'MILLAN, (of limy-Street, _Covent-Garden); and Publtshed by c a Scalp Ps, (of south Muit ,, n-strcet, Crosvenur.so,ual:2 )i At the Su 11.0 Fr ic z, No. It 2, Strand ; where iidwertzsements, Orders for the Pirptr, Letter, tpr .the Editor, &c,(p. , st-pard), m ust Deatidtcsied. fully painful, and had hem. in a state of"tilcer last seven years; my left hail also t'a•O 'large [m •was very ath discoloured,and gave me sio liy; pain, particularly when warm in bed 4 as;i' prive the of rest ; in this lamentable. state,' I mended by Mr. J. ; Thompson, (whO receive , cure by them here) ; to take your Leak:f.'s which I began to do on, the. 76th of May ; it of a fortnight, I began to receive benefit—in than a month, the ulcers on 'my herd and a_ pele soundly healed--soon after; the sores on my leg' fit 5• also;' leaving, however, consitterable diso,looratiou, c 13 1 ', / Skin, and pain in the bone of the left, which, by O r sing of Cod, and a little longer perseverance in. yoo,' lc 5)4 luable Medicine, sub Sided ;- the nodes disper,shiK, 4 0 1 1, regaining its.nat ura I hue, and the noclurnal pains going oil: I thus became, by your liberal advice at`.•` ll o', o ! i c lvi i e n l e e r I s l e l l ie ti r tb r a i n nfl;o , months to • the astoilislunent of a)1 who knew me, for the good of other sui-Kling mortals, to mak,, c 4.7. 3 - ,!t o, ) ill? 17 1 ' a loss in what terms to e:press my gratitude,' bu t r case as public as po.ssihie, as I shall on ei' ve r in so doing, you wilL greatly oblige, Sir, 'o l ,;olt.}C ) .' opedient, very' humble servant, ALEX- . NI Swan's Close, I-Ligh-street, EdinburgtL • 0 4' Witnesses to the above Cute Air ket (ono THOMPSON, No". 3, New roultry lona M'lNTosn, Old As „ i „bi y-Close, IE dinburb ri „e• • Prepared and Sold by the sole Propr ietor, of Do TI-10.10AS TLYIA.)It, Nlember of the Royal College , 'gecins, at his House;Nrd: . 9, New Bridge-street, ,iof where, after a co nstant res4lence of mot! than ti" 6 01 1 : 50 r Years, in a pradice articularly diret,i4 l to I- 11 ' inP i of Venereal Coninlaints p and those iii.;iderital to the pt Gen.,..ration, v. : lth that inviolable secrecy Avil,; c' o ol o li. his profession sliwildalways observe- in IA- 1 -cl i flatters hinisell, the. advice and assistance l:e• administers to persons taking this Medicint: , .jvaut • f • esteemed, by a discerning Public, as ail at • o . . &unattainable and void of all ambiguity. - • • St Also sold, by. his ap l iointrnenc, for the coll,' T ; . 3 5:0' those living at• dist:Lux, at Perfurner's, •L" o p h ot; Alban's-street, , Pall•-•Nlall - ; , 'the Tovshop, rc ez - `;, , er ford -street; Mr. Disborougli's,,..No: 7,. fish-stie Mr. Steel's, Book No. 1, Union-row. Li t ior. hill • _ Baxter's, South-bridge, Edinbuto ; 9 1 pc dota i ld, 'C Ilsgow ; • Mr, 'Caldwell's, Dublin ; ,01$ person in every considerable town in Great Brira"‘,,itli rt of iand, in Boxes of - olifY as. 9,1. sealed LIP r se% and •"plAn '‘Oiereby pcy-si)ns of eith e il fetY• 'cure themselves with ease, sper4i, secrecy., ;12 101 s • i I,ip „ e d, Nel Bo s oid gc at taia pre o a Stamp, e- on Y wim• x li, by favour of the Coolo. printed, at the Stalapj.)flice.--" T. 'Paylor , ; lintlge- - street," inmate whits is Felony, 4 ate Counterteits. F, ...Al the LONDON GAZETTE, Feb. ~ Bo¢. [Some inaccuracies having been discovered in the List of Sheriffs, we reprint them as they appeared in the Gazette.] AT the Court of St..james's, the tst of February, 150.4., Present, the KING's most Excellent Ma jesty in Council. SHERIFFS APPOINTED BY HIS MAJESTY IN COUN CIL FOR THE YEAR, ISO+. BEDFORDSHIRE—C. Edwards, of Henlow, Esq. 'BERKSHIRE—R. Mathews, of Wargrave, Esq. Bu.cics—E. Nm,ent,,of Lilies, Esq. Am], AND HUN-V.—B. Keene, of Wistow Lodge, Esq. C Essu tIR E—Sir 3. F., Leicester, of Nether Tablet, Bart. Coma LA No-1. De Wheipdale, of Penrith, Esq. DERBYSHIRE—Sir H.. Every, of Eggington, ---V Bart 74, Davosostponed. Dor( srrsii r.—Robert Williams, of Bridy Hea , ittle Bridy, Esq. EssEx—W: Palmer, of Naiing, Esq. GLOUCESTEitsittaL—N. Clifford, of Frampton-upon-Se vern, Esq. HEar.rogoSlllß F.—R. S. Fleming, of Dinmore Hill, Esq. Henvs: — E. Garrow; . of Totteridge, Esq. KENT — Sir W. Stirling, of Shoreham, Bart. CESTER S IMRE—Postponed. LiscotNsiliaz — R. Vyner, of Godby, Esq. • INTirlmotrns l-1 IR a—Postponed. NOR FOLK —Henry Styleman, bf Snettisham, Esq; NOR r n NirrON sn a E—C .Tibbitts, of Birton Seagrave, Esq. l k •ION Tuuttssiair.AND — Sir T. 11. I..7tetiell,ot F.slington, Bart. NOTTINGHASISES IRE—T. W. Edge, of Slreney, Esq. o,crolt Ds 0 EH. Langston, of Sarsden House, Esq. RUTLANDSHIR E —C. Thompson, of Kelton, Esq. SALop—Po , tponed. SOME itSETSHIR E-1. Rogers, of Yarlington, Esq. Sr A F FOR DS HIR E—R. lesson; of - West Bromwich, Esq. HAm PSH I s E—Sir C. Mill, of Mottesfont, Bart. SUF FOLK—POStPOiIgd; SOAR EY—W . T3orradaile, of Streatham, Esq. SUSSEX—J. Dennet, of W. odmancot, Esq. WAR W zcs..snt R E —R. Vaughton, 'of Sutton Coldfield, Esq. WI LI s —W. ' Lock, of Rowd Ford, Esq. Woke EST ER S 111 RE—E. Knight, of V. oolitetley, Esq, Yomc.sulas - 1. Fox, of Bramharn Park, Esq. • SOUTH WALES. CAUTARTFILN-I, H Simmons, of Llangannah, Esq. Per.twkE—Sir . Owen, of Orielton, Bart. CARDIGAN—j. Bond, of Kefn y Coed, Esq.. GLAMORGAN—IL T. Pielon, of Ewenny, Esq. BEcoN—P. Williams, of Penpont, Esq. P-AoNoR—T. F Lewis‘ of Ilarpton-court, Esq. NORTH_ WALES. "Mr.RIONETII—Sir E. P. Lloyd, of Park, Bart, CA RNA RVON-0. M. Wynn, of Penma:hno, Esq. ANGLESEY—T. P. Jones, of Cefn Coch, Esq. NIONTGOMERY—C. H. Tracey, of Greginnog, Esq . : D ENBLGH —R. W. Wynne, of Garthewin, Esq. F L rift—R. Garnons the younger, of Leeswood, Esq. PRINCE OF %VALES'S COUNCIL. Coolly of CorncuialL . •• At a Council of his Royal Highness. the Prince of Wales, .held at Brighthelmstone the id day of February, I 80. E., Sir Lionel Copley, of Bake, Bart. was appointed Sheriff of the county of Cornwall for the year 1504, by his Royal Highness the. Prince of \Vales in Council. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. March 27. 1. Mills, of Wood, Yorkshire, dyer, at ten, at 'the Star Inn, Manchester. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. - T. Dowding, J. Lowe, and S. Bishop, of Wood-street, hatters. --------- 11,11\a'RUPTS. john Hives,, of Ilkeston, Derbyshire, baker, to surrender Feb. 27, 28, and March :7, at eleven, at the Blackmoor's- Head, Nottingham. Attornies, Messrs. Cutts and Sanders, Nottingham ; or Messrs. Macdougall and Hunter, Lin coln's-Inn, London. Christopher Wild, late of Manchester, Viaualler, Feb. 13, 14, and March 17, at twd, at Hillidge's Tavern, Man chester. mturntes, iMessrs.Shephard and Adlington,G ray's inn' London; or Mr. N.Vetherall, Manchester. Peter Rogers, of Warrington, shopkeeper, Feb. 22, 23, and March 17, at three, at the Star Inn, Manchester. Atror tries, Mr.'Huxley, Temple, London ; or Mr. Barnett, Man ehester. Robert Wood and George Payne, of Liverpool, wholesale . grocers, Feb. 27, 28, and March 17, at eleven, at the George Inn, Liverpool. Attornies, Messrs. Lace and Hassan, Liverpool; or Mr. AtkinSon,'Chancery- lane. William Hill, of Bristol, jeweller, Feb. 14, 13, and March :7, at twelve, at the Rummer Tavern, Bristol. Attornies, Messrs. Edmunds, Lincoln's-Inn, London ; or Mr. Thomas, Bristol. joint Clarke, of Tealby, Lincolnshire, paper-maker, Feb. 29, and March 1, 17, at eleven, at the White-Hart Inn, Market Raisin, Lincolnshire. Attornies, Mr. Brown, Great Grimsby, Lincolnshire; or. . Mr. Grey, Gray's-Inn, London. Richard Spencer Fern, late . of Suifolk-lane, London, cry. salter, Feb. 7, at eleven, 13, at ten, and March r 7, at one, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. WilliarM and Sherwood, Bank-street, Cornhill. Edward Taylor, now or late of Blackburn, Lancashire, linen-draper, Feb. 13, at four, ts, an , .i March 17, at eleven, at the Dun- Blackburn. Attorney, Mr. llewhurst, Blackburn. ' Thomas Crossley, of Manchester, dimity- manu faaurcr, - Feb. 22, at eleven, at the W hire- Bear, Manchester, 27, at the Angel Inn, Ashton-under-Line, and March 17, at the White-Bear Inn, Manchester, Attorney, Mr. Higginbot torn, Ashton-under-Line. 'John Wright, late of Gosport, grocer, Feb. 14, at three, is, at ten, at the Fountaisi Tavern, and March 17, at twelve, at the Crown Inn jGosport. Attornies, Messrs. Minehin and Cin - npigne . , Gosport; or :Messrs.lTarrant and Moule, London. Joseph Weedon, of Oxford-street, oilman, Feb. 11, 18, and March 17, at ten, at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. feasdale, Bishopsgate-street Henry Uouel, of Golden-Leg-court, Cheapside, wholesale hojer, Feb. t t, at one, 2.;„ and March 17, at ten. at Guild. hall. Attorney, Mr. Harrison, Northumberland-street, Strand. David Moffatt, of Fleet-Market, grocer, Feb. TI, 18, and March 17, at eleven, at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Rivers, Basing-lane. DIVIDENDS. F e b. 23, R. Gilbeytson, of Manchester, manufaolurer, at three, at•the Golden- Lion, M anchester. Itlarch fi. j. Fox.and W. Fox, of the Pavement, Finsbury, merchants, at ten, at Guildhall.. , Feb. 29. I. Dyer, of ‘Votrotf-under-Edge, Gloucestershire, spinning machine maker, at two, at the Swan Inn, Wotton under- Edge. - Feb. 27. R. Leigh, of hampton, Devonshire, cooper, at ' eleven, at the ,W hite Hart Inn, ‘Vellingto.n. Feb: 25. !I. Cooper, of Sandwich, Kent, linen-draper, at eleven, at G , m ar ,th 3. R. Lewis, of Codford Saint Peter, Wiltshire, shopkeeper, at one, at Guildhall, London. March 3, S. Fox, of Wardour-stieet,, cabinet-maker, at ten, at C Feb. 2s. T. Toy, of Penryn, Cornwall, linen-draper,. at ten, at Guildhall, London., March 5. - R. Scaley, now or late of Bruntelitfe, Yorkshire, spirit merchant, at eleven, ' at the Three . Legs. I nn, Leeds. Feb. 27. 1. fames the elder, of Nottingham; i:otton-spinner, at eleven, at the Black moor'&Head, Nottingham. Feb. 27. Suart, of Kim talen- Brouk,Lancashire, whitster, at four,. at the Bridge Inn, ISOlton: • March W. Barfoot and T. Barfoot, of -- Coleman—street, !...6foeers,:at nine, at Guildhall. • Fi:b.l27. S. Cullingworth, of Daventrv, Northampton, bookseller, at-e.l'even,.lit !he. Wheat-Sheaf inn, Davemry. Feb. zi. Reynolds, of Newiligton-13Utts, biewer, at ten, at Guildhall. • CERTIFICATES: F e b. 2j. C. Broomfield;Tite of Liverpool, porter-brewer. N. lonev, of IVoodstock ~;street, Oxford -street, warehouse— . LAW REPORT. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, SATURDAY, E 3. 4, TIIE KING V. EItGAS. THE Defendant vas indifted for a Libel, and a mo tion was made on his - behalf that he-May be allowed to defend as a pauper, upon an affidavit stating, that he is not worth 51. and praying that he may hpe Counsel assigned him, and have - the indulgen cies usually granted to paupers. FOXHALL 'V. LORD ARUNDEL. This was a Rule obtained by Mr. BURROUGHS, calling on the Plaintiff to skw cause why a rule calling upon the Sheriff to . return a Writ of . Fieri Facia' should not be enlarged, on the.ground that An injunction had been granted in the Court of Chancery to stay proceedings in this came until an answer shall be brought in and further order made in that Court. • There being no doubt the injunaion was .bin ling on all parties Whom it applied to, and that the Sheriff would be guilty of a contempt of the Court Of Chancery if he proceeded, the rule was of course made absolute. Mr. BURROUGHS moved 1, - ,r a Certiorari to re_ .move an indictment preferred against Lord Bolton and others, charging them with a Libel, in publish ing certain proceedings of Magistrates in the country, &c.—Rule granted. COURT, OF CHANCERY, r J AN. 3t. EAST-INDIA COMPANY'V. DONALD. This was a Bill, filed by the East India Com pany, praying that the Defendant might be ,de creed to pay to them the sum of toool. with in terest, as money- had and received to their Use. The circumstances of the case, which are extremely important to all persons conneded with East India Shipping, were shortly these - : Messrs. Mitchell and Crawford, being owners of the Ship Fort William, had 'chartered the sime to the East India. Company for a voyage; to Madras, on which occasion Captain George Simpson ap plied for the Command. /-‘,C;er ,some negotiation, this application was acceded to,: on Simpson's exe cuting a bond to Mitchell and Crawford,. binding . himself to pay to them, previous to the commence ment of each voyage, the sum. of roool. as a consi deration for his being appointed Captain. The ship performed her first voyage in /79/, and, in 1792, Mitchell sold his interest in her to the De fendant, Donald, who soon after called tipon Simp son to resign the Command ; but, after some nego tiation, it was settled that Simpson should retain his situation, on executing a bond to the Defendant, in the same terms as the former, which was given . up and cancelled. In the Charter Party, which was executed pre vious to the ship's sailing on this voyage, and dated on the /7th Sept. 1794 a covenant was inserted, that neither the owner, master, or any part owner, should, on any account, sell, or permit any other person to.sell, any situation, office, or command, in the said ship, or should receive, in any manner whatever, any sum of money or gratuity, in respect of any place or office in the said ship, or in consi deration of any person in such place or office re signing the same ; and that, in case any such owner, part owner, or master, shall so offend, then that the money or gratuity thus received, sh a ll be Considered as received for the use, and on the ac_ count of the said United Company ; and such of fending party shall pay and account to them for the same, or the full value thereof, wish interest; and the party shall be bound to make a lull discovery in equity thereto, and shall not plead in bar of suc h deariaud. PreVious to the ship's sailing from the River, Simpson paid to the Defendant the sum of wool. as the consideration for his appointment, and ae . - cordingly performed the voyage. - After the return of the ship, she was chartered for a second voyage by the Company, Simpson still retaining the com mand ; but the first voyage not being successful, he did not, previously to sailing on the second, pay to the Defendant any sum of money whatever. Some short time after the completion of this second voyage, the Defendant desired Simpson to accom. Filly him to the house of hiS agent, when lie asked for a paper parcel he had left there, saying at the same time to Simpson, " In case I had died before your return, this would have been delivered to you;" and the Defendant, at the same time, put the parcel in his pocket, and 'shortly afterwards repaid to Simpson the sum of Aoool. which the latter had given him previous to the first voyage, saying, '' There is your money again, an d I hope you will resign the command of the ship," This Bill was accordingly filed by the East India Company, praying that the Defendant mi g ht be declared to have received this money for their use and on their account, according to the co v e nant in the Charter Party, and, praying that he might be direded to pay the sane to them with interest from the time that he had received the same. The Defend otherwise, but as a consideration for his appoint_ merit to the command of the ship; and he admitted t h e f a as stated in the. Bill. The LORD CHANCELLOR, after hearing Counsel on bo:b. sides, prqnounced his judgment. After stating the fads of the_case, his Lordship said, " It is clear that as to the, money paid upon such„trans atlion as this, it might be recoverable in an anion at law ; but where a specific delivery up is neces sary, the remedy must' be in a Court of Equity. — The language of the Covenant in the Charter Party is rather obscure, but the true meaning of -it must be, that where a party receives a sum of money in violation of his contrail, that it is'not to be con sidered as enforcing a penalty against him, but as money had anti received to the use of the Plaintiffs and if the remedy is not taken away by the delivery up of the' Charter'Party, Donald must be a debtor for so Much -had and received for their use nor will the Circurnitance of his paying it back again destroy their right to enforce their demand. In the pre:;ent case,' both 'an aCtion at law and a suit in equity may 'be maintained, even taking as granted all-that the Defendant had stated, for the East India CoMpany are not privy to:the trinsadions between those parties. " The payMent of 'cool. by Simpson to the Pe fendant is clearly proved, while the Charter Parry still continued in force ; and the Defendant must clearly be liable to this dernand,:unleSs the money was advanced, not by way„of gratuity, but df,loan. " It is necessary here,. according to the rules of the Court„ to consider the faas.as stated by. Silnp-- son; he was examined .for the Defendant ; b ut his deposition is wholly i,n support of the Bill, and, he positively denies having ever paid this .10001. or any other sum, as a loan. There is, certainly, no proof of the allegation • in the Bill, that amald told Simpson he might continue in. the command upon the . same.terms as before ; but, upon his cross.exa- Initiation, he says, that it was agreed he should con. tinue in tki ti ? command, and that, previously: to the ,commencement of each voyage, he should pay 10001,, which, he says, on, the first voyage, he regularly paid. •The Defendant does not in ,his ,answer deny the allegation introduced into the Bill, that it was. so agreed, and iliac Simpson executed a bond for•the• payment of!such sum accordingly. With respeft to the paper parcel, there is no' proof of what it contained, for Simpson says,• that he never saw it after the Defendant took .it.; and said, you see what I intended to da for you in case of alyAleath.' " The circumstances nntler•which this money was paid back are certainly very extracrdioary. It is clear that Simpson; could . hale no . right to demand it. The bond is not pranced, nor :was there any conversation between toe two voyages.which cated any demand an tile- pact :of,'Simpson, nor -.•any ~intimation from the Defendant to him, that he con sidered this sun) as it loan w c hich,he . was- to repay, and. it is . not until five years. had elapsed, viz, on the , 6th of „Septanber,, 1798, that!the, -money is returned and- it• must• be : ob.sei - medtb that it 'is then conne&ed with. a hope, that , Simpson should resign, the command. If Simpson lent the , money, he did .it without. army docurnent-.or security, and it is not- a little singular that theDefertdant should permit' the matter to-rest until after: the second voyage, without any communication or, explana tion on the subl.6l. The DefeJadant pOsitively de nies that the .transadion was. as stared: Simpson as positively denies.that the sum paid by him was as a l o an. hut as a ,gratuity- alone " If the Chatqer Party :had not been destroy ed, an aftion a 2 law might have--been 'brought, and Simpson called as- a Witness The neCessary , consequence must hiiie been a - verdift for- the Plaintiffs, if It is a painful necessity' imposed upon a' Judge sitting in a ,Court of Equity, to decide: on Which side the truth lies. In this court, the rule oftvi dence gives the Defendant the prote(fion 'of his own conseience,•and you most contrast the evidence of an interested -party with that of one who interest 'at all. It is true; that if a Bill is filed i n ' i hi s Court, that' y ou ' may read the on discovery sc t o l l i e l ry a • t only, la„ 'and the D e f en da nt , consequently, haS the advantages of l a yi ng hiS i i t .t sn-v foraer own evidence before the Jury, though' he could not be examined Biwa voce. thiS - Court, the general rule is, that if the answer'coritAns a po,i live denial to the case stated in the Bill, and it is contradined by one witness only, there cannot he a decree against the Defendant, unless the circum_ stances so 'preponderate against the oath of the Defendant, that greater credit must be . given to. the witness 'than to the answer, laying aside all re colleffion the oath of one of the partieS is that of an interested person. Lord Thurlow, I think, rightly - said, that if the 'rule of this Court was to give equal credit, unless where circumstances pre. ponderate.over denial, 'and the Jury is called upon in such a case to decide, there must be an evident inconsistency,' because the Defendant cannot he heard unless you order his answer to be read, and thin he must be heard with the prejudice of in t,:rest, • whiCh in this Court you diSmis's from.your mind. 'ln thiS ease, do circumstances so outweigh, as to call upon me to decide against the Defendant ? An inquiry at law is certainly less favourable in its -principles for a - Defendant; but if -he desires it, he must have an issue to try the question. Upon the second "point, whether these Plaintiffs are entitled to any relief, the Charter Party being, delivered up, I an of opinion, that there are many cases in which this Court must reiuse to ael, yet wher e -i t does an, if that made any difference in the case ; indeed I think that the delivery up of - the Charter Party rather assists the claim for equitable relief. But it is necessary for me, b - dfore I can decide 'final.: ly, to knoirWhethet the Defendant' desires to have an Mr. RomILLY said, he had advised his Client not to desire an issue. SHIP NEU'S, nr,Avsg.F.l4ll, FE.I. Passed by---the Cybelle: U Smitni, from Memel; and th: Expedition. from • .. Sailed—the Ste - Id:, I . lrcikvo,, for . New Providence ; Concor - Vergeine•Tankeit, and the Vrosv Martha , Hendricks., forToiniingen. DIED. Litely, at Bristol, Samuel flenderson, Esq. Merchant of that City.: • On Friday, of an apoplectic fit, and very much regretted by a numerous circle aecitiaintahce, Mr. Roberts, sell. 0 the White Horse inii,, Fetter On Friday morning - last, at his i louse at Thorpe Lee, Sur; rey, at the adv tj..-edage of ?i, Sir Edward Blackert, Bart. 0 Matf:m, in the Cryanty'at Nur:huniLerland. PRICE OF STOCKS, SATUR DAY B ink Stock I india Stock Na 5 ier Cent. SRM- India Bonds ! , 07, Oinnittin Irish ; per Cent. 'roper. 3 per Cent. 54ii 4 pzr Cent. Con 72 a Mao 'Ann. 9i 3 or( .IZ. 3 6L ik 6 Bank for Account 3 per C Con 5;;i1 . Del . :lrma 3 per Cent. B. L. 'Ann. 16 7-161 • I Cons. for Feb. 55i/i B. S. Ann. • VALUABLE ESTATES IN THE NORTH OF SCOTLAND, TO BE SOLD, . 'THERE is to he Said in the course of the el" sttin4 Winter, toe ESTATES of Oa) . CASTIJ- : ' HILL, VIE . STER INCHES, CRADLEHALL, Dl: 1- , - KIES, MAINS - of CASTLEHILL, STONvYFIEL v, Boom Tow ; ,;,, mu CLIOVIE, and BOGBAIN, all 2 1, "' liiverne'sis, in clitretent Lots: These Estates are beautifully sitmted in the irrimedial Neighbourhood of the thri%:ing :Ind populous Royal Boro , o f I nvernes s, Fort George, and the Caledonian Canal, w hicgil is . now begun. The Farms are in general stiffi c iently 'IL I- , closed and in good order, with Houses, Office-houses,Gar dens, and thriving Plantations of Wit9cl. Among;;the 1 11 . ,'' Y advantages, a great part of tli...- IF s%ites"are along the Sea - s td and have the bAtefit of the Sea Ware, The hills, which ' arc , Extensive; abound with Game. - The Lands and Barony °; OM Ca§tluhill, vvitli the Bar , .;.it of Barony. ) , are ,11 'ld of 0 -- King, and alli,rd a Freehold"2..6littiCaticinto vote for a Melly her to 'serve in Parbarninit :„for, the County of I nverness'• Gentlernea who vvi..dt to purchase... Lands in the Nos tit , :c Scotland, will seldom find such -des:iable pro.:)erties in t ,, ~ Marlott. • - . For further information; application to be made to CarOr bell Mackintosh, Esq. of Inverness. .__,_--- , , - ~ ...., . 0 No. 2,9, Arundel 7 stree,t, March I, !SoP l a LT A \TING dedicated - myself to the study, ' - ' l '. fl , il_ 1. been gratified by the' ntriseconsiderable pradicc ill t a l v e branch which I thnight prOplir fo Sided, I trust that I 11 .4 , not more Tnisemployed my time - than' those who, in thel'ilt tensive field of the Profession, are occasionally immerlii uncertainty, and cannot always attain , that success whi' l3 ss acquired by concentrating= hie intelledual power to one of <tisrdersaSe .-• . • - , _ . t t i ef I he Di sesof Debility are peculiarly distressing ; fol t or a bring with them a train 4,coneo ir tn._ant Cyrript,2:lo,, awl, r ii.. , Opressiort of all.vital energy', existence. Itself bOCOllle,'S e rl ; e r tered. ' Whether City . 'arise-front tire prevalence bi i c et ample, the destructive habits of schcc/boys, of the 10 , 0- cuseahle iniitilg.znees, - -6.f-ificatnrity, they require the ino) t pt si4tious prolessiqnal Skitli , and well may it be observe.r. , r 3. by the ignor M iceof uneducafeit.men,- tile symptoms :ire a l, ''' vated, and the col:stitution-itiestroyed. . cl+ O r ' ,!',As a ,Meariber of tLe..B.o,yak Ce.il,6c of _s t ,.r ge . on s, ail , f.., ,,, insilv Sun:,;n in the A 1;flly, I.cgAnd ffly pretensions › i ' . ,.61„ gt h wi lu a cel i v}: .. " : t l it i 4i t; , l ? !.:: i in r i r e. t ts ' o l t : 'll l b s ; : e r!c t : ca n i h i . h ;t il l na l if s b ld l i ci e lt :i di a s l:f 11:1}::',..1:1:11:111,inio,:ctei .i.ir,.;:.::l,l.strdisYc;l:)calreii.u::Yiyilet;:ipil;tvti(j):.%co.l::,':::.,4o::. the sutlerer, front 3 couscibusnoss. of the unnian,,ness t lifvice 11:11iCit. C;it.;SC:t IliS Misfolluile, is fe i niul of the cat r' i f l ' ;r n i cs l t e i . :f l o y s : u- ;. :•,:i 1 ( :1 , i . 1 ; 3 1 il l k r i c e l c F : l i , tT i i' c Li j o i t i l l ' o c l : p a i lt A n s o c i :p. i i.‘ c ,: l l ) t a . iTi .01 ti i i i s t :1 :f t l , 3,Qorts.s.raet:i t v tl i e a l r a:? ) , i ,,. : f alsO of the Mostiilvic,lblecciecy . . ' ."' lc 'o ° , I lit. fly, •••`... ve 4 l6i:.il. 01seasi: Cntarninates the sP a- i - eo' life; thpiceP of r i....Y..14Fe.%:. akiliOi:soned by it, 'arid4o-..-. is injured by the indli;9:et:on Of an unguarded moment' nit' 1 .. •• . In recent.venerealopip ... l4ints.it is possible to prat' . 0 1,t jt daitger, or distreSi;;' arylin the moSt ciunplicatect ca ti , e.''' the acquirement of exclusive experience in this liri' i .,, a sarc, cer tain, and Sr,.'2:ly re-establisdhMent. . • 1 f c ... , ,',:• - ' 1 oiler the 'acivantair,e of this ex ocrience to those °,l7r. SQX who are afflided with any kinu'of debility, , ,r . a ny ',,, 4 4 toms of Venereal InCe:Ton, and its all ca , :!:.. 11: , .., W'' retimnerition are stated-on the first interviev. - . x - , Patients in the Country areareexpe tt 4 ed to i:!c!'"'s e r,,1-,e 3, rt:4 Note, and are requested to specify their ace - , -, . ; 3- -it• , 0 living, as well as the existing synintoms of the .- 0 :' - '1' . . .;`,I.ARTIN I . ilt.EF ', i ,ll ;er Member of the Royal of S ~ <- in Lo n f f College tft,Coll, ,_„•, ~4, No. '29, Strand, Arundel-street, - nez r Terniiie),,,O.:- 4- is an additional entrance in Water - tr ^t .d , ' 'n - ' .., .: e,, ~/ oun g.- ! -- i To THOMAS - TAYLOR; Esq. No. 9, New. Bridge-Street, London. eat'„ Honoured Sir, Edinburgh,• March 15, re tri' IriFT.Cy leave to inform you, that ever, si ll ve...iw year r7)O, 1 have been allliaedivirh - the rej; which, hum its obstinately resisting esr Medicine prest rihed by the most eminent of 1, nere, and undergoing - several severe . courses and twice dis.:har4z:d from the Hospital; with would appear to fre_of:t . be asst' inveterate hat! spring of 1:1st year rhy cns,order' sid - got to 5;.t . c nearly to'put a period to rriy existence-1 had 1 on the crown 91 my head, one on each tiriff, were broke out, in a frig:lt ful manner ; my' rigl r rile c•t• 1 tle i r , l . s wK) :1 ' ' • ctr e iv? , e „ e "., 1 ,,, ed so pa iati :hsc