The Sun. — London, England, 1847-07-16 00:00:00

ELECTION MOVEMENTS. MAR TLEBON E. On Wednesday a numerous and respectable meeting of this borough was held at .the Alarguts Camden, I'llor :street, estaden-n:wn, Air. Howarth in ti!e chair, for the purpose of hearing the oolitic& sentiments of Lord Dudley C. Stuart. His Lordship spoke at some length in explanation of his opinions and of his conduct when in Parliament. It had been said by Mr. Sergeant Shee that though he (Mr. Shee) had not yet done anything to signalise himself as a tit person to'represent the tmrough is Parliament, it was because he had not been in Parlia ment, and had therefore had no opportunity, and that the only difference between him and Lod D. Stuart was, that the latter had been in Ptrliatnent, had had the opportunity, and had stilt dune nettling. Now he (Lord Dudley Stuart) thoug tit could hardly be said that he had none n, thit4,, a nen he had atwa3s taken an act: , e part in favour of all lib, rat measures. Lnd against all of a contrary tendency. and had also taken so prominent a - part in a matter which was in the Highest degree im portant to England and to the whole civilized world, and which, wheiher important or not, must be interest ing to every right-minded Englishman—the affairs of Poland.—(Great applawe.) 11:s Lordship dwelt at some length upon the importance of the establishment of the freedom at.d nationality of Poland, as setting up, in the midule of Europe, a free anti liberal nation— (Cheers)—at:cl coucludeo by detailing the circumstances under which the ballot between himself, Mr. Sergtant Shee, and Mr. D. W. Harvey had been agreed upon. He considered that that ballot, wnich will take place on Mondsy next, would set the whole question at rest. If be had a majority he would consider himself seated ; if not, he would make his. bow and retire.—(Cheers.) Mr. BOYCE proposed the first resolution, and Mr. BROAD, iu aeconding it, took occasion to observe, that so far from "doing nothing," his Lordship had, while in Parliament, actively supported and voted for fourteen important lir,eral measures, VIZ. :—Refortn, Corporation ;Worm, Church Ref, ray Appropriation of Irish Church Revenues, abolition of St,svery, Abolition of Impressment, Abolition of Jewish Disabiliti ti,_Poor- Ive Amendment, Abolition of Property Qualifica- tion, &c. • - The resolution, which was to the e ffect, that Lord Dudley C. Stuart was a fit and proper person to repre sent this borough in Parliament, and that the meeting pledge themselves to support him at the ballot and the pull, was carried unanimously. At.er giving "• three times three and one in " fur the Noble Lord, and pasong a vote of thanks to the Chair man, the meeting separated. RAILWAY SHARE i'VIARKETS. LIVERPOOL, JULY 14. STOCK EXCHANGE.— The sales are—Eastern Counties, 20is—East. LAucashire, I di , .—ditto, New 1 ,4 dis.—tiud dersfield Canal arid Railway, 1:% p.--Leeds and Thirsk, Pre ference, di4.—London and North- We:qern,,, New Quar ters, 10% p.—Manchester and Leeds, Halves (late find. and Sheff.), 2 p.—Ditto, Fifths (late West Riding; Union), 1 4 p.— Manchester, Sheffi,ld, and Lincolnshire, Quarters, 2 dis. —Midland Stock, USlA—Ditto, - New, 4' p. —North Staf fordshire, 274 p.—South Eastern and Dover, No. 4 (issued as Third shares at 6 2-3). 6s. 34:h dis. DIANCIiEbTEIt, JULY 14. STOCK EXCIIA NG E.—The es are m bergate, No tt in g ham, and Boston, 1;a dis.—Birmingham and Oxford Junc tion, 73( 4 p.—Blackburn, Clitheroe, &c., Preferentials, 3 p. --Derby, Stafford, and Woreestr=r, dis.—Eastern Colin - ties, York Extension, % die.--Fast Lancashire, New (scrip), 3-15 p.—Exeter and Exi.nouth, dis.—Great Northern, London and York Extension (scrip), 1 / 2 die.—Eluddersfield and Manchester Railway- and Canal, 3194—Ditto, 1 13-16 p.—Leeds and ThiNlc, Preferentidl4, 11-16 dis.—Leicester and Bedfdrd, dis.•--Liverpool, Manchester, and Newcastle Junction, 1. 1 / 1 . dis.—London and North-Western ( Manches ter and Birmingham), Quarters (C), 6 1 / 8 p.—Manchester and Lead., 32/. Shares, par—Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Midland, . 1 4 eds.— North Statiordilnre. 21A p.—Oldham Alliance, par—Preston and Wyre, halves (13), 14 p.—South- Eastern and Dover, No. 4, 5-16 dia.---South. Yorkshire, Don caster, and Goole, par- Torkawl Newcastle, Preference, 4 p. i>IIEFFIELD, JULY 1 STOCK EXCH.% WGE.--The sales are—Manchester and Leeds (%Vest R;ding Union), ls. 6d. c. p.—Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincf,inshire (Grimsby. and Sheffield), 201. Shares, 31 4 dis.—Ditto, 121. 103. Shares, 395. dis.—Ditto, f)ock4, 4t4 dis. —Ditto (Sheffield and Lincoln), :OA dis.—Leeds, Wakefield, and Midland, 235. dia.—South Yorkshire, Doncaster, and Goole, 3s. dis. LEEDS, JULY 14. STOCK EXCHANGE. —The sales are— Ambergate. Notting. ham, and Boston, 275. 6d. n. dis.—East Lancashire, 15s. n. dis. —Ditto, New, dis.—Ditto, New (scrip), Is. p.—Great Northern, 31s. dis. —Huddersfield- and Manchester, 13 n. p. —Leeds and Dewsbury, 48, p.— Ditto, Halves. IA B p.— Leeds and Thirsk, 6 1 4 n. dis.—Ditto, Preference, 12s. 6d. dis.—Leeds, Wakefield, and Midand, 1 1 / s dis.—London and Brighton, and South Coast, Consolidated Eighths, 3 p.—Lon don, Oxford, and Cheltenham, 151. dis —Manchester and Leeds, 321. Shares, Is. n. p.—Ditto, Fifths, 4 n. p.—Ditto ( West Rifling Union), 4s. 6d. p.—Newcastle and Berwick, 8 n. p.—Ditto, New, 3 p.—North British, Quaners, 23g. ed. c. p.—Nurth Staffordshire, 23 n. p.—North-Western, 1/ 2 n. dis. EDINBUTGII, JULY 13. STOCK EXCHANGE.-Thd sales are-Aberdeen, 304- Airdrie and Bathgate, 31. 10%-Arbroath and Forfar, 261. 10s.-Ditto, Hal.ies, 141. 103.-Ayr and Galloway, 2/. 10s. -Caledonian, 30/. 2s. 64 - 1.--'-Ditto, New, 21.-Caledonian and Dumbartonshire, I!. 153. 6d.-Clydesdale Junction, 49L- Deeside, 34 55.-Dunblane, Doune, and Callender, 11. 7s. 6d. -Dundee and Arbroath, 37/. 10s. ex div.-Ditto. New. No. 1, 291. 103. ex div.-Ditto. New, No. 2, 32/. ex div.-Ditto, New, No. 3, 31. 10s.- Dundee and Northern Junction, 1/. I Is. 6d. -Dundee and Pertb, 331.-Ditto, New, 13/. -Ditto, (loaners, 31. 65.-East of Fife, 11. 18s. 6d.-East Lothian Central, 11. 178.-Edinburgh' and Bathgate, St. 5..-Edin burgh and Glasgow, 691.-Ditto, Halves, 221. 10s.-Ditto, Quarters, 17/. 2s. 6d.-Edinburgh, Leith, and Granton, 191. 2s. 6d.-Ditto, Preference, 201. 10s.-Ditto, New, 24 Is. 6d. -Ditto, Quarters, 135.-Edinburgh and Northern, la/. ss. -Ditto, New, 3i. 155.-Ditto, Newport, 7/. Bs.-Ditto, ditto, New, 2/. Its. 6d.-Edinburgb and Perth (New Co.), 11. 33. -Ditto, Halves, 63. 6d.-Glasgow and Ayrshire, 1204 155.-Ditto, New Stock, 42/. 2s. 6d.-Ditto, Halves, No. I, St. 7s. 6d.-D.tto, Halves, No. 2,6 Z 11s.-Glasgow, Dum fries, and Carlisle, 5/. 7s. 6d.-Glasguw and Garnkirk, 391. -Glasgow General Terminus, 121. 155.-Glasgow and Gree nock, 191. 55.-Ditto, Halves, 9/. 10s.-Ditto, Preference, 8/. 2s. 6d.-Glasgow, Kilmarnock, and Ardrossan, 31. 12s. 6d. -Great North 4f Scotland, 1/. 17s: 6d.-Great Northern (late Direct Northern), 44 53. 6d.-Ditto (late London and York), 11. 125.-Newcastle and Berwick, 29/. 10s.-North British, 334-Ditto, Halves, 15/. 173. 6d.-Ditto, Quarters, 41. 10s. 6d.-Ditto, New Quarters (scrip), 165.-Ditto, Thirds, 2/. Its. 6d.-Ditto, Fifths, 6/. 10s.-Scottish Cen tral, 284-Scottish Grand Junction, 195.-Scottish Midland, 181.-Shrewsbury and Hereford, 103.--Shrewsbury, Oswestry, and Chester, 9/. if:la.-Ditto, New, 11. 2s. 6d.-Stirling and Dunfermline, 41. 17s. 6d.-Stirling _and Midland, 21. 55.- Wishaw and Coltness, 491.-York and Newcastle, 38/.- Ditto, New, 171. 2s. 6d.-Ditto, Preference, 12/. 17s. 6d.- Direct Bombay and Madras, 2s. 3d.-East Indian, ss. 3d.- Great North of India, 2s. 6d.-Great Southern of Madras, 25.-Madras, Nellore, and Arcot, is. 6d. GLASGOW, JULY 13. . _ _ STOCK Excirwroz.—The sales are—Aberdeen, 29%-- Dundee and Perth, 331.—Ditto, Quarters, 66s.—East Indian, 4s. 9d.—East Lothian Central, 37s.—Edinburgh and Perth, 22s.—Glasgow. Kilmarnock, and Ayr, 1211.—Ditto (5 per cent. guar.), 42 1 ,4 —Glasgow and Greenock, Halves, 9% — Glasgow, Kilmarnock, and Ardroasan, 75s.—Great North of India, 2s.—Mancbester and Southampton, 14s. 6d.— Ditto, New, 21s. 6d. —North firiri4h, Thirds, 51s. 6d. NIGHT BALLOON ASCENT. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir,—As one or those who jolied in the "perilous fookry,"—and, now that I have experienced the chances, I can rn) selt give , it no better name—of the night balloon ascent last week, permit me to hope that the manage ment of Vauxhall will see the propriety of putting an end to such exhi'Ations, after your admirable article in the Times of this day. There is nothing gained in the venture to balance th chance of the sligilte:t accident. The balloon is out of e sight in two minutes, and the . a aeronaut is thought no more of as soon as the next firework ground, or the other .4 intrepid" indrivildluabTutsth`7l:otsiodnotwhne the wire with the squibs in his heels ; wander about, he knows not in what ditection, unti e l f'tto day light, or make some haphazard descent in the dark, without assistance, and as possibly on the roof of a house, or top of a tree, or in t h e middle of a river, as in an open field. If the fireworks exploding in the air at a great height are the attraction, they might be attached to a small balloon of vurniAed paper and have the same effect, Sailing away no matter where, when over, and gradually settling down. But if there is any other excitement *Wet the matter, it must lie in the chalk* that the gazers can procure, for half-a-ciown, of sa)ing, when the seronau; is dashed to pieces, that they " saw him go up." Bad becoming, individually, accessories to the suicide. I b i n* You will not consider that I am intruding on your sPitee with them, few observations; and I beg to subscribe myself; Yours respectfully, 14, Percy street, 13 ciforci.strtn'TAeL,l3:;;RTLSMlTll. Tractarian observance saran prevalent in South Devon, fur we learn from the sv li'exiern Ti mes t h at i n one s to im w i n la a r I n .u e m w b o er fics o , f w 4 - I,,i ci it, a e . o,. s_ ace b e i ng rep l aced by makes Im4euit. in the ca m 11.4 a f::ction..r in Kingsbrithi e crobs" and ' mar fish." and is ohtaanng unpr. cedented patronage troll the hi g h church p irty. FaaNCII CATTLE.—The steam-ship H arlequin, arrived from Boulogne, has brought 35 heifers, first importation ot live cattle into the being the metropolis.fr om France during the present season. MURDER BY A MANIAC.—An inquest was held on Monday last at Killeeuadenna, near Louv.hrea, b y Th om as Walsh, E , q. , coroner , o n view of the body of " a " child, nine years old, named AI Huge, who was killed by • a maniac named Fatly, while in a frantic state. He has been subject to occasional tits of insanity. and was a l. lowed to be tit large, and unfor.unately he met this child while labouring under one of his delirious moods, and dashed his brains out with an irnmen-e stone. A ver dict was returned in accordance with the fact• stated, ei,tlcl the unhappy man was removed to Galway ool.— tidu'Tl Vinclie t a " MAYTIEL h 13 .—Accorni: ng t o appearance, there w i ll be a r• A. ,r short crop of hops, the vermin hat+ g in creased v ery f ast WI . . thin tr;ese last few days. This pes tilence is genera' bhould it continue through most of the plantations ; and much longer wi' bout a change, the crop will fall very t. The pot ' toes continue to look well, apd-all.9ther crops 1 3 .* ~74utipaq,„. Ps are progressing favourably.— A'' "12!'761/TER.—Wedn.esday:Mr. W. Carter held n... . :. WO - at the Wind 1111sworth, r , _ ,":* tsiiiilie,e24dr. o f Nta nl r ill, High-street, Lambeth, ides ; iKiS:A. ii t at No. 23. digb-strect, who died fr,.in aged 68 years, '.. the effo:6 tif *juries caused BruCe, on Saturday night last, y ut a d man circumstances al named James ready detailed.; : _The jury, atter hear i ng -the wirnessys, .4 the testimony of Ithgr Yell„ evidence of surgeyn, who avribilt..d death to the ruptur e IncYv,L,the Vei 44, rt•suJigit l k - hp, , n external vi,j,, ne ,.. '- - of ri "''''''"" dice 01 - nlianslaughter agkaomt. 3,..es rt - li tu r e u , , c.o a vk t•-• gaol Bruce," await vih° ' stands committed to Horsemonger-lane bis trial. s COA SIS TORY COURT, July 14. • (Before 1)r. LIISHINGTON HODGSON v. THE INHABITANTS of HILLINGDON. The COURT, on the motion of Dr. R. Pnillunt re, de creed a faculty to issue for the repair and eulargemont of the parish church of Hillingdon, in the county of Mid dlesex. FITZOERALD V. FITZGERALD. This was a suit for a divorce by reason of adultery and cruelty promoted by the wife against the husband. The proceedings were carried on in r mnam. The Learned Judge was criite satisfied with the pro 4. and granted the prayer of Mrs. Firzgerald. TUCKER ?Y. TUCKER. This also was a cause of divot ce by reason of adultery, and was instituted by Mr. Tucker against hi wife. The parties were married in the presidency of Bengal on the 14th of Oct b'r, 1842. The lady was a native of France, aid there were three children, the issue of the m trriage. She arrived in England with her husband in 1846, and the adultery was pleaded to have or_curred in the course of the voyage, and also since the arrival of the parties in this country. Th Queens's Advocate and Dr. Addams appeared for Mr. Tucker; Dr. ilaggaid and Dr. it. Phillimore fur the wife. _ _ -- ...._. •The Learned JUDGE called on the counsel for Mrs. Tucker first to address the Court. . . . Dr. HAGGARD submitted that there was no principle better established than that it was impossible to pro nounce for a divorce on the confession f,f the party alone. What wis The evidence relied upon to establish the charges made in this case ? There were the letters of the wife, and from the language used iu them it would be contended that there was an admission of her having been unfaithful to her husband; but he was quite at a loss to discover anything in the shape of supple mental evidence. There were conversations proved be tween Mrs. Tucker and a witness who had been examined, but still they were the admissions of the lady herself, and the canon precluded the Court from pro• flouncing for a separation under such circumstances. There were several passengers on board the ship, one of whom only had been examined, and he stated that there wtis nothing to justify him drawing the conclusion that there had been any criminality on the part of Mrs. Tucker. He (l)r. Haggard) denied that since the parties reached this country there bad been any oppor tunity for the commission of adultery. Mrs. Tucker, shortly after her arrival, was entrusted to the care of Mr. and Mrs. Succole, and whatever admissions had been made to the latter must be taken with reference to the state of her mind at the time, for it was evident that she had been labouring under insanity. De. R. PHILLIMORE having followed on the same side, The Learned JVDGE, without bearing the Counsel for Mr. Tucker, said, that if he had entertained any doubt whatever as to the sufficiency of the evidence in this case, it would have been both his duty and his incline tion to avail himself of any benefit that he could derive from the argument of counsel; but as he really could not tiring himself to think that there was any deficiency of proof either in law, or morally speaking, to affect the conviction of• his own mind, it was unnecessary to trouble them. He did not in the slightest degree dissent from the wisdom of the canon which prevented the Court from pronouncing for a divorce in a suit for sepa ration whether I mensis et thoro or pro dividendo matri monii vincula, upon the confession of the wife or the husband, unless tor the best and plainest reasons, be cause it enabled the Court to guard against the possi bility of imposition. He hoped that of late years there had not been many attempts to obtain a separation by reason of adultery throu4h a confession, when in fact the act had not taken place. He must, however, take care that he did not stretch the principle beyond those bounds within which it ought fairly to be confined, otherwise, cases would be left without remedy in which there was a real grievance. The present case did not fall within the decision in " Mortimer v. Mortimer" or " Hemmerton r. Hammerton ;" the case of " Grant v. Grant" was much more applicable to it. He had looked at the letters written by Mrs. Tucker addressed both to the father and the husband, and it was impossible to do so without coming to the conclusion that they contained a confession of aduliery. What was the auxiliary evidence? It was proved that Mrs. Tucker was ready to receive and did receive a letter written by the gentleman with whom was alleged she had committed adultery, and nobody could peruse that letter without being satisfied that it was an admission of an improper intercourse having taken place between the parties. It was to be _ regretted that more evidence had not been procured from on board the ship, but it was clear that the parties had remained together a day in Liverpool. Was it possible for him to doubt that criminal intercourse had then taken place? No one was bound to prove the precise time and place where it occurred. There were also de clarations made to Mrs. Succoie at a time when 21t , . Tucker was not in a disturbed state of mind. He had no doubt of the guilt of the wife, and must therefore pronounce for the decree prayed. ..........—.... LAW IN TELLI GEN CE. i The UNDER-SHERIFF said it was not improbable that COURT OF CHAA . Ch.RY, Lincoln's Inn, July 14. a man might forget, after a lapse of 40 years, but if he IN RE DYCE SOMBRE (LUNACY). intended to commit deliberate perjury, he might imme- Mr. BOLT (Mr Shaciwell was with elm) again men- diately have said at once that he had given her away, tinned the petition in.this matter , and stat e d that the but it was entirely a question for the jury. object of it was to have a rebesrirgof Alr.Dyce Sombre's The jury foune for defendant. case, in order to prove that at the present time that gen. I PAYNE V. MAGSON. Unman was perfectly competent to manage his own PAYNE, ADMINISTRATOR, V. MAGSON. affairs. Mr. Dyce Sombre 's property in India was The first was an action to recover the sum of 1061. for g kting into a very perplexed condition, and therefore he money lent, arid the second, as administrator of his father, to recover 331. 4s. 3d. for goods sold. The plaintiff is a was extremely desirous o f g oin g out there to su p er i ntend its management. brasslounder in Shoe-lane, and defendant a brass finisher. Mr. Tinney and Mr. Moore appeared for the commit- The case was wholly devoid of interest, and a verdict was tees of the estate, but took no part in the discussion. given for plaintiff in each ease. Mr. BETHELL (with Mr. Calvert) for the committee THE TITHE COMMISSIONERS OF ENGLAND AND WALES of the person, resisted the application, which they stated V. HARDEN. was in , ff-ct the same that had recently been heard This was an action brought by the Tithe Commis eefore his Lordship, and refused. The only result which sioners of England and Wales, to recover of the defen eould accrue from rehearing the matter would be to add data, who is a tithe valuer, the sum of 181. 18s. for the to the already enormous costs. enzrossments of the apportionments of the rent charge The LORD CHANCELLOR inquired whether Mr. Djce in lieu of tithes, undLr the Tithe Commutation Act. It Sombre was within the jurisdiction of the Court? appeared that the copies were ordered by defendant for Mr. RuLT answered that be was not at present. If, the Hamlet of Catgut, and the parish of Woolhavington, however, his presence were required, he could be in lin the county of Somerset. Defendant's excuse to the England within 48 hours—the instructions having been Commissioners was, that he could not get in the money forwarded from Boulogee. from the landholders, and he requested the Commis- The LORD CHANCELLOR said he would look through sioners to assist him in enforcing the payment. He had, the affidavits before he expressed his decision upon the however, given the orders, and promised to pay. application. The jury gave a verdict for the amount claimed. The petition stood over accordingly. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, July 15. This morning the Court resumed its sittings. IN RE CHARLES HUSK. The insolvent, who had been in partnership with James Scott Boyce, as meat salesmen in Newgate Mar ket, applied to be discharged. Mr. Commissioner PHILLIPS expressed his surprise at the schedule filed by this insolvent. Ile owed 4801., and had owing to him as much as 2,170/. Mr. NICHOLS, who supported the insolvent, said it was as stated, but as the insolvent could not get in his ac counts, he could not pay what he owed. Mr. Commissioner PHILLIPS thought the insolvent might hare got in some of his debts; they were greatly b•yond the debts he owed. The insolvent was asked about some of the debts, aid it appeared that he could not get the money. In otle case he took law proceedings, and the result was, that he had only to pay some law expenses. Mr. Niel:tots was of opinion that the officer of the Court. (Mr. Wiggins) could collect the money for the creditors. . . Mr. Commissioner PHILLIPS —lf the schedule is cor rect, there is more than 20s. in the pound for the creditors. _ . . No creditor gave himself the trouble to apply for the assigneeshi p. The insolvent was discharged. IN RE JAMES SCOTT BOYCE. This insolvent, partner of the ab , :ve, was the next applicant. His schedule was nearly the same, and a hope was expressed that the creditors would be paid in full. He was discharged. BLOOMSBURY COLIN I Y COURT, July 15. FIARTEG V. REEDING.-BAD MONEY. The plaintiff, in this;WOn,sougi,t to recover of James Reed, a newsvender, the sum of 2s. 6d., under the fol lowing circumstances : Having been sworn, the plaintiff said that on the day of the Epsom races, he entered the defendant's shop to purchase a copy of the Evening Sun, to ascertain the result of the races. The newspaper was given to him, and in payment he tendered half a sovereign, but before he had received his change, seine other gentleman pur chased an Evening Sun, for which he gave half-a-crown, and received the difference, before plaintiff, to whom 9s. 7d. was afterwards returned, amongst which was a cad harfcroen, the coin (he believed) that the defend ant had taken from the second purchaser. The plaintiff placed the money in his pocket, without examining it, and he did not discover that the halfcrown was bad until the Tuesday following. The coin had nut been out of his possession during the whole time. The defendant said he could not be liable, as he did not believe that the naafi:l-own produced in Court was the same he had given to him in change. Mr. Dußois (the Judge)--Ile has positively scorn that it is the same, and I must credit his statement, in preference to what you believe. The defendant—Yes; but I don't see that.—(Laughter in Court.) Consider for one moment how unprotected a tradesman would be ; any person who had a base coin might swear that. Mr. Dußois—But the law will not allow you to pass bad money, and it is not probable that any person would commit perjury, and risk transportation fur half-a crown. They would begin at a sovereioli.— (Great laughter.) The defendant was then ordered to pay the amount claimed, and was about to quit, the Court with the bac. haifcrown, when Mr. Wright, the Clerk of the Court, requested the loan of it fur one moment, to test whether or not it was silver. The coin was handed back to the defendant in two pieces. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. HOME ClRCUlT.—Chelm,ford, July 14. (Before Mr. BICOD PARKE.) THE DAGENHAM DIURDEL Thomas Kimpton, formerly a police-constable of the K division, surrendered to take his trial upon an indictment, charging him with having committed wilful and corrupt perjury, upon an examination taken before Mr. Lewis, the coroner for Essex. Mr. Clarkson (with Mr. Bodkin and Mr. Clarke) con ducted the prosecution fur the Treasury ; Mr. Hawkins appeared for the defence. Mr. CLARKSON, in opening the case, said that the charge against the defendant was one of a most serious character, and the offence was aggravated by the circum stances that the defendant was at the time he was alleged to have committed it a member of the metro politan police force, and the perjury was committed upon his examination as a witness before a public autho rity, upon an inquiry into the circumstances connected with the death of another constable, named George Clarke, who, there was no doubt, had been murdered in the execution of his duty. It would appear that the deceased (Clarke), the defendant, and some other con stables whose names would be mentioned in the course of the examination, were stationed at Dagenham, in this county, and they were under the superintendence of a ser:reant named Parsons. On the 29th of June, 1846, —which was the day on which the murder was com m.tted—the deceased and the other men were put on their beats as usual, that of the deceased commencing at a place called the Four Wants, and it was the duty of the sergeant to patrol during t h e nig ht, an d meet t h e men at different places, in order to see that the duty was properly performed; and, in the course of the night, he should have met the deceased at the Four Wants. Claike, it appeared, was missed from his proper post. and, although every search was made, nothing was heard of him until the 3d of July following, when his body was found in a wheat-field in the neighbourhood, cruelly mutilated, and there was no doubt that he had been most foully murdered. An inquiry took place before the coroner, and it of course then became a very material point of inquiry to ascertain when the unfortunate de ceased was last seen alive. Upon the first examination the sergeant was summoned as a witness, and in con sequence of some portion of the statement made by him, a belief was entertained that w rens he should have been to meet the deceasea at the Four Wants at one o'clock on the morning of the 30th, he did not go there at all, and the inquiry was adjourned for the production of rerther evidence. Kimpton wee examined upon this occa sion and he merely deposed to finding the body. An adjo .rnment took place till the 14th of July, and on that da l he was again examined. Prior to this it appeared that Mrs. Page, the wife of a farmer in the neighbour hood, who had lent the policemen a cart to take away the deed body of their comrade, was examined as a witness, and she stated that when Kimpton brought the cart home with some of his comrades, she asked them to have some refreshment, and while they were partaking of it she asked Kimpton at what time the sergeant last saw the deceased, and he answerd that he did not see him at all, tor that, being unwell, he had asked him (Kimpton) to do his duty for him, and had told him to take his horse for that purpose. Kimpton, upon being again examined, swore that he never did do duty for him on the night of the murder, and, also, that he bad never made any such statement as that deposed to by Mrs. Page. Some further adjournments: took place, and at the difl-rent inquiries the evidence given by Mrs. Page was confirmed by her daughter and other witnesses, am' at length, on the 20th of August, when the coroner's inquest was concluded, the defendant himself admitt e d that his statement regardin g his not having done duty for the sergeant was untrue, and that on the night of the murder he really did take his horse and do his duty, and that the sergeant was not near the Four Wants at the time he swore be was there on the night in question. The Learned Counsel said there could be no doubt that this false statement of the prisoner had the effect of ma terially interfering with the course of justice, as •it had the effect of diverting the inquiry that would probably have taken place into a totally different channel, and it was for making that false statement the present indic:- meat was preferred against him. usbselxr., Cprhoavreledstheeahrnoeldil4wis, one of the c o ron e r s f or The followi ng ev id ence was then adduced:— of the inquest after the find ing of the body, and he produced the depositions taken on the different days to which the inquest was adjourned. The depositions were read at length, but it will not be necessary to refer to them more particularly than to state that, on the 14th of July, w hen the jury met for the second time, the prisoner swore positively that he did not do duty for the sergeant (Parsons) on the night of the murder, and that he saw him on horseback per forming his own duty of inspecting the men at nine, at twelve, and at three the next marning, and that when h e we nt off duty in the morning, he told him that he had not been able to find Cl itke on his beat. The other mater al derosition was that made by the defendant on the 20!h of August, when he admitted that his previous statement was false, and that at twelve o'clock on the night of the murder the sergeant toad him that he was unwell, and asked him to take his horse and do his duty for him, and that he went to the Four Wants to look for Clarke but d,uld not find him, and he brought the hcrse home at two o'clock in the mot gin f;, and saw nothing of Parsons until six, when he awokz-• him and told him that all the men were on, exc-pt Clarke. The defendant, upon this occasion, also said that Parsons told him he must say that he saw Clarke at one o'clock, and said that he (Parsons) should say the same, andthekton and the other men must tell the same story. Cr oss - examined—Witness was quite sure that the de. fondant was re-sworn upon every examination. A great numbe r of witnesses were examined at the different inquiries. By Mr. CLARKSON—For certain reasons, he wee very par. icular in observing that the oath was duly adminis tered to the policemen who w ere c xarained, • Mrs. Eirzahf,th Page; the wife of a farmer at Dtg t - haw, deposed to the fact of the police making a search upon her farm for the body of the deceased, and that when it was (Auld she lent the defendant a cart to re move it. The defendant and some other policemen came home with the cart late at night, and she asked them to have some supper. While they were conversing upon the subject she asked the defendant at what time Ser geant Parsons last saw the deceased on the:night he was murdered, and he replied that he did not see him at all, for that he (Kimpton) had done his chit) for him on the night in question, as he was unwell. Priscilla Page, the daughter of the last witness, con firmed her testimony respecting the statement alleged to hive been made by the defendant on the night in question. John Stevens said that at the time of the murder he was one of the police stationed at Dagenham. There was but one horse at the police station, which was used by Sergeant Parsons. By the COURT—Sergeant Parsons was on duty some portion of the night of the murder. He saw him at half-past ten and at twelve o'clock. He was on horse back both times be saw him. He was discharged from the police after this occurrence. Thomas Archer said be was employed on a farm near the Four Wants, and on the morning of the 30th of June he was up about half-past twelve o'clock, and was engaged in preparing a horse and cart to go to market. Whil so engaged, about two o'clock in the morning. the defendant came up on horseback, and he gave him a light for his pipe. After he had lighted it he asked him if he had seen his mate (meaning Clarke), and he said he had not. _ By the COURT—He supposed he meant Clarke, be• cause he was the only constable who did duty about that neighbourhood. Abiah Buttoy deposed that be was also one of the police stationed at Dagenham at the time of the murder. He did not of his own knowledge know whether the sergeant was on duty or not on the night in question, but in the course of a conversation that took place be tween him, the defendant, and Hickton, the defendant said that on the night of the murder Sergeant Parsons gave him the usual nightly report, and told him to take his horse and go to the Four Wawa and meet Clarke, and give him the report, and he also said that that was after twelve o'clock at night. Kimpton also said, that when he got to the Four Wants he could not find Clarke, and he rode on to another man's beat; abd that he aftt.r. wards wont over part of Clarke's beat, and kept the horse out until nearly daylight. The witness stated that he also heard the defendant say that the evidence had been given before the coroner in order to exonerate Parsons. Some more policemen had been sent down to Dagenham in order to strengthen their force; and it was agreed that they should endeavour to prevent the young hands from knowing that the evidence which ILA been given before the coroner was false. Cross-examined—Witness was now living at Bethnal green, where he worked at his trade of a broad silk weaver. By the COURT— Did not know what had become of Serg , ant Pars , •ns. John Stevens recalled.—He saw Parsons on horse back near the Church Elms about 12 o'clock on the night of the murder. John Barnes, anoiher constable, deposed that after the first examination before the coroner the defenoant said that if they did not keep to the story that Parsons had written down for them about his being on duty on the night of the murder they should all get into trouble. By Mr. HAWKlNS—Parsuns wrote out a statement of what they were to say before the coroner. This was the case for the prosecution. Mr. HAWKINS addressed the jury for the prisoner; but it was very evid , lit, from the tenor of the Learned Counsel's address, that he felt he could not offer any an swer to the facts. Mr. Baron PARKE having summed up, the jury re turned a verdict of Guilty. Mr. HAwKiNs th en t,4,1t an objection to the form of indictment, which, he said, merely averred that the off- nce was committed on a certain day in the year IB4G, and he submitted that the indictment should have courained the words " in the year of our Lord." Mr. Baron PARKE appeared to be of opinion that there was something in the objection, and he said he should take time to consider of it. Isaac Hichbn, another constable of the same division, wai then arraigned upon a similar indictment, arising out of the same transaction. _ . The evidence was of precisely the same kind, and it will therefore not be necessary to repeat it. • The prisoner, who had no counsel, admitted that he had told some lies with regard to his meeting the ser geant on the night the murder was committed ; but he sAid he was induced to do so at the sulteitation of his superior officer, and to screen him from censure for neglecting his duty. The jury tiyund him Guilty, but recommended him to mercy.—Judgment deferred. NORFOLK ClRCUlT.—Bedford, JON 14. The commission for this county was opened yesterday by their Lordships, who also attended Divine service, so that the two Courts were opened for the dispatch of business this morning. On the Civil side, where Mr. Baron Alderson presides, there was an entry of three causes; one of these was undisputed, the second involved a disputed right to a moat, and the third was a case of assault. exercised similar rights during the corresponding period of time. On the part of the defendant it was proved that he had derived the moat close from the Fountains, who held it for three generations, and it was also skown that rights of ownership similar to those proved by the plaintiff had been exercised by the Fountains, but not later than 41 years back. Mr. Baron ALDEBSON left it to the jury to say to which side they would incline. There was proof of ownership on both sides, but that of the defendant had not been brought down to so recent a period as that of the plaintiff; but it wa, for them to say whether the moat in question belonged to the moat close or to the adjoining lands. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The calendar contained the names of ten prisoners. whose offences, excepting one of arson, one of man slaughter, two of burglary, and one of stealing Post office lettets, to which the prisoner pleaded guilty, were of an insignificant character. Besides these, there was an indictment for a misdemeanour under the Bankrupt Act, which, having been found at the last assizes, was taken at the sitting of the Court. CROWN COUR r.-( Be fore Mr. Justice PATTESON.) John Blau-ton, aged 22, pleaded not guilty to an in dictment which charged that he, being a trader, had committed an act of bankruptcy on the 24th day of No vember, 1846, by a declaration of his inability to meet his engagements, whereupon he was afterwards duly de clared a bankrupt, and that theretofore, and within three months, he had, by falsely pretending that he had a large shipping order, obtained certain goods to the value of 50/. from one J. Taylor, at Luton, with intent to de fraud him. Mr. Prendergast and Mr. Power appeared for the pro secution; Mr. Dasent conducted the defence. It appeared that the defendant, whose brother-in-law resided at Luton, in this county, where there is au exten sive trade in the straw - plait carried on, repaired to that place in June, 1845 , and there established himself as a ed straw-plaitcontrived married tatr ircrvat check ttbohhoei push dunpaseuhut pursuits it himselfte A sr o l o t fhf business, into t g s Although business,ecsh withoutm an.and aaHnn dys dealer marriagescha shortly n ri tt al I ~ he def t the prisoner accordingly entered into some further trans actions which did not appear to have led to any favour able result. Be that as it may, he repaired on the 223 of August to the warehouse of Mr. Taylor, who dealt in bonnets, and representing to him that he had reeeivei an extensive shipping order from Liverpool for such ar ticles, requested to be immediately supplied with 410 bonnets, adding that if he could not have them he be lieved he should lose a good customer. On this repre sentation Mr. Taylor consented to take the order, and the goods were forthwith supplied. Iu about a week the prosecutor heard some sinister rumours touching the sol vency of his customer, and repaired to his warehouse, where he ascertained that the whole stock on hand was not worth more than 51 It should be stated, that when the goods were sent the defendant, according to the cus tom of Luton, gave his acceptance at three months for them. This, like many others such, was not paid, for in the meantime the crash came and the deendant coin mitted an act of bankruptcy on the 27th of November by the means stated in the indictment. At the close of the case for the prosecution, Mr. DASENT objected to the reception of the bank rupt's examination in evidence against him now, as he had not been cautioned before he gave his answers, and the examination its elf wa s on oath and compulsory This question, he believed, w as st ill un d er cons id era tion by the fifteen judges in Garbett's case. The Learned Counsel, also, at the close of the case for the prosecution (which embraced an admission by the defendant of the fact that he had not had any shipping order from Liver pool), submitted that the case did not fall within the Act, which contemplated the fraudulent assumption of the character of a trader by a bankrupt rather than the fraudulent obtaining goods by an admitted trader. The words of the Act 5 and 6 Victoria, chap. 122, sect. 35. were—" If any bankrup t, under the false c o lour and pretence of carrying on business and dealing in the ordinary course of trade, shall have obtained goods on credit from any other person with intent to defraud the owners ;" and he submitted that the facts of this case did not fall within the spirit of these words. Mr. Justice PATTESON (having consulted Mr. Baron Alderson,) intimated that they were both agreed in overruling the objection of the Learned Counsel, it being their clear opinion that the statute applied to the case of a trader who obtained goods, in the way of his trade and in the ordinary course of dealing, with a view to defraud the owner. He might also say that he had spoken to his Learned Brother on the other objection, as to the admissibility of the bankrupt's ex amination against him, and that they both thought it was receivable. It was not necessary to caution a bank. rupt, and he was obliged to answer all q uestions put to him on oath under the pressure of the laws relating to had bankrupts. He (Mr. Justice Pattes on) never enter tained any doubt a s to the propriety of receivin g such vidence on the ground of its having been given utithr the compulsion o f suc h an examination ; and he might say that, though no judgment was yet pronounced in Garbett's ease, there was no differenc e of o p inion among the judg es on this particular point. The case must, therefore, go to the jury. Mr. DASENT having a ddressed the ju r y on the merits His LORDSHIP summed up the evidence to them, leaving it to them to say whether they thought the de fendant bad been actuated by the intent laid in the in dictment. The jury having found the defendant Guilty, he was sentenced to six months' imprisonment, without hard labour. CIVIL SlDE.—(Before Mr. Baron ALDERSON.) EUSTACE V. NEAL. Mr. O'Malley and Mr. Wells were counsel for the plaintiff; and Mr. Sergeantyles appeared for the de - B • fendant. This was an ac ti on o f t res pass, in which the plaintiff complained th at t h e d efen d an t bad interfered with and in:errupted his rights in respect of three sides of a cer tain moat dividing his land from that of the defendant. F. osi the evidence adduced it appeared that the moat in question surroueded a piece of land belonging to the de Pendant, called Moat Close; that that dote was ap. proached by a road across a common and by a causeway, and that on three sides she moat was bounded by the property of the plaintiff, and on the fourth by that of one ifolu3es. On the part of the plaintiff it was shown that he derived his property from the Ellingham family, who held for three g enerat i ons un d er o ld Molly. Ellingham; th&l, ;luring the e a r li est times the Ellingleons had exercised rights of owners hi p over tile moat adjoining their lands till within the l as t t wen ty-five years; while Holmes, who bought from one Falcon, had claimed and ' LONDON, FRIDAY MORNING, JULY 16, 1847. CATrERALL V. CATTERALL. This was originally a cause of nullity of marriage, promoted by the husband against the wife, who is resi dent in New South Wales. That suit was abandoned, and the husband then proceeded on the ground of adultery. Dr. ADDAMS (with Dr. Robertson) appeared for the husband, and submitted that the case was clearly estab lished, there having been a child born twelve months after Mr. Catterall left his wife in New South Wales, and proceeded via India to this country. The QUEEN'S ADVOCATE (with whom was Dr. R. Phillimore) called the attention of the Court to two or three technical objections with regard to the marriage ; but, The Learned JUDGE thought they had no weight, and prominent d fur the divnri.e. AIMIRAL7 Y ('Olin , July 14. (Befure Dr. LIISHINGTON.) THE MELLONA—COLLISION. This case, which was partly heard on Saturday last, was brought to a conclusion. The brig George, of the burden of 108 tons, bound from Newcastle to Cowes in the Isle of Wight, and the schooner Mellona, of 106 tons, proceeding from Shields to Guernsey, came into contact with each other while passing through the Cockle-gat on the night of the s:h of March, 1845. Both vessels were coal laden, the brig close hauled on the starboard, and the schooner on the larboard tack. The wind was blowing from the E. N.E. There was considerable dispute as to the character of the night. The brig represented it as starlight, with occasional snowstorms; the schooner as thick and hazy ' between the storms. The George was a very old vessel, and, after the collision, ran upon the Barber sand, where, striking heavily, she went to pieces, and three of the crew, including the master, were drowned. The QuXEN'S ADVOCATE (with whom was Dr. Bayford) contend, d, on behalf of the George, that the accident arese from the want of a good look out being kept on board the schooner. Dr. ADDAMS (with whom was Dr. Robinson) appeared on the part of the Mellona, and submitted that the collision arose from unavoidable accident ; that at the period when it occurred the night was so dark that with every precaution and care it was impossible to prevent the vessels coming in contact. Ile also contended that the runnine upon the sand was not attributable to the collision, but to the want of skill on the part of the person at the helm. The Learned JUDGE submitted to the Trinity Mas ters (by whom he was assisted) three questions—first, whether, considering the state of the weather and the part of the sea where the two vessels were sailing, and i h n e g r e t h a e good tat e hth the chance of meeting with ot he r ships , the master of the Pil f•Ilona ought, to admitted, to have left the de c k w i t h only two seamen—in other words —was out kept? Secondly', w — co w n, a i s der t w , of the weather, if . a good look out had been kept, there lity was a possid o f av oiding the collision? Thirdly, whether there was sufficient evidence to justify the c.a. elusion that the George was subseqnently lost by the ig norance or misconduct of her master? ellona; that if there , M The TRINITY MAsTEAS were of opinion that there was 'net a goo d l oo k out on b oar d the had been a good look out, there was a possibility of the • collisio n b e i ng avo i ded; and t h at t h e s e bquent loss of se the G , orge w as not attr ib uta bl e to an y want of skill on the part of them .s er or crew. The Learned JUDGE, having expressed his concurrence its th e views entertained by his assessors, pronounced tbr resultt d a o m f a t g h e withis investigation co costs ; and would added, o p e r t a h t a e t nh some hoped degreeth e to prevent that utter carelessness which the Court every day perceived to exist in colliers tradu g from the north and that y to she south. Th ese v , sieli must not t or ge t that they had in many resp ects a dangerous navigation, from the multitude of vessels that now occup , ed that part of the oceen the danger of elusion was iufinitely increased beyond v. • ' /eienerly. SHERIPI- coU it , July 15. (Before Mr. linclor-Sh. riff Burtcau.l.) NoortE V. CAMPBELL The plaintiff in this action, Is a b:Cer in the Vassall road, Brixton; the claim was fur 101 . Bs. 4d. rl• gouds 8)1d. The defendant pleaded enverture, and in support of the plea called defendant's brother, named Baulter, who s s ore that he was present at the marriage of his sister at Bawtry, in Yorkshire, in 1809, to a Mr. Willi", Duncan Campbell, and that he was still alive. wi tness could not tell where he resided. Defendant had not lived with him tor se.me years, and she had a separate income of 2001. per annum. In crow examiration he said he could not remember wh , thf.r or not he s. , :uve h ~, v , He !!: : : got certificate. A juror said that he could not believe that a Man did not remember such a circumstance, NORTHERN CIRCUI T:—York, July 13. CROWN COURT.—(Befare Mr. Justice W. 'OUTMAN.) William Pinder and Thomas Robinson were charged with having, on the 26th of February last, at Rothwell, in the West Riding, feloniously as:raulted James Heald with violence, and stolen from his person 117 sove reigns, 10 promissory notes for the payment of 51. each, and 100 shillings, the property of Ruben Plummer and others, to whom the money belonged as trustees. The prisoner Pinder pleaded Guilty. Mr. Ellis and Mr. Hall appeared for the prosecution ; and Mr. Price for the prisoner Roliiason. Two men were already convicted upon this charge at the last York assizes. One of them, a man named Brook, was now called for the prosecution, against Robinson, and the evidence of the accomplice was con firmed by other testimony. After a lengthened investigation the jury retired, and remained out of court for more than an hour, when they found Robinson Guilty. Sentence—The two prisoners to be severally trans ported f.,r 15 years. Ckri,tvher Atkinson stood charged with having, on the 4th of April, at Wathgill, feloniously stolen a gelding, the property of William Horner, a farmer residing at that place. Mr. Blanchard and Mr. Ovcrend appeared to prosecute, and the prisoner was defended by Mr. Matthews , . William H ,rner stated that the horse in question had been missed from his stable on the morning of the 4th, which was a Sunday. It was safe in the stable over night, and was subsequently discovered at Barnard Castle, which is from 18 to 20 miles from Wathgill. The witness and his wife, Maria Horner, had been living apart for 18 months, she having left his house. She had since been there, however, during his absence from home, had broken the windows, and taken away some clothes and other articles. Several witnesses were called to prove the finding of foot tracks, on the Sunday morning, near the stable, and leading to the highway. There appeared the tracks of the horse, and the foot steps both of a man and a woman. The imprint muds by the man corresponded in size with a pair of biota afterwards found upon the prisoner upon his ap prehen,ion at Barnard Castle. The witnesses said that they supposed that the two persons must have both mounted the horse on arriving at the public road after getting through two or three fields from the stable, be cause there were no tracks but those of the horse beyond the prosecutor's premises, and from these the !gorse's steps went in the direction of Barnard Castle. Prisoner and Maria Horner (prosecutor's wife), were seen toge ther t hat morning going towards Horner's, at a place cal ed Marsk, three miles on the Barnard Castle side of Wath gill. They were afterwards seen together at a public house on the same road, where they remained for about half an hour, having somethirg to eat and drink. The prisoner was afterwards found at Barnard Castlo, and the horse in the stable attached to the house of one Barker, near whom Atkinson was living. Richard Pearson, constalfilc of Barnard Castle, stated that he had fiend the horse on the ssb. The stable in which it was had been locked, and he saw the horse through the ke) hole. Snowden, a constable, since de ceased, brought the key into the yard, but the witness could not say whether he had obtained it from Mts. Horner or from the prisoner. Witness having spoken to Atkinson about this charge, the latter replied— What made me go there, I wus led away; I went with Maria Horner to bririg away the horse." The Learned JUDGE intimated that the prisoner could not be convicted of larceny upon such evidence. Acquitted. The prisoner, who had been out on bail, -was then discharged. His Lordship also directed that Maria Horner, the prosecutor's wife, should be set at large. She was committed upon this charge in April, and had remained in custody till this day. No cause list has yet appeared; but it is stated that thre will not b- more than about half as many causes at these as there were at the last assizes. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. H. G. Bough, clerk to Mr. Lewis, solicitor, and co roner for Essex. was brought before the Lord Mayor in the custody of Jehn Forrester, the officer, charged with having committed a forgery upon the bankingehsuse of Coutt- and Co. to the amount of 2221. 15s. 6.1. Messrs. Bush and Maliens, the solicitors to the Committee of Bankers for Protectien against Forgeries and Frauds, at tended for the prosecution. Mr. Wontner appeared for the prisoner, who seemed to be a very young man, and in a delicate state of health. It was stated on the part of the prosecution that it was impossible at the present moment to produce some of the evidence, the witnesses living at a considerable distance from London, and pains having been taken to avoid de tection by ingenuity of more than ordinary extent and character. It would, however, be shown that a 501. note 1 which had been traced as part of the proceeds of th e money paid for the forged cheque was handed over by the priioner to his tailor, Mr. Dowdney, in payment of a bill contracted by him with that shopkeeper, and that the prisoner, in accounting for the possession of such an instrument, said, it formed part of the proceeds of the sale of several horses by the prisoner in Smithfield market—a statement for which there did not appear to be any foundation. Mr. Frederick Esse, clerk at Messrs. Coutta's bank ing -house, said—l recollect perfectly well receiving on the 13th of Apr:l last a cheque for the payment of 2221. 15s. 6d., purporting to be signed by Mr. J. S. Caley, a customer of the firm. It was contained in an envelope, requesting that the amount might be given in a certain way. The letter containing the instructions had been destroyed as immaterial. I remember the contents, together with the cheque, were to the effect, that Mr. Anglican, in whose favour it was drawn, requested it might be paid in the manner expressed on the envelope —namely, in a note for 2001. and a note for 20/. and the rest in cash. I took it to Mr. Partridge, the cashier, who gave me the notes, which I enclosed in an envelope and gave beck to the person who brought the letter. Mr. Joseph Partridge, cashier at Messrs. Coutts, said, —I delivered the amount of the draft to the last witness on the 13th of April, in a bank-note for 2001., No. 48,479, and dated 4th January, 1847, and a bank note fur 201., No. 18,731, and dated 9th January, 1847, and the rest in gold. Mr. ‘Vontner particularly examined the book in which the entries were, and asked the witness at what time he made them ? Witness—l made the entries on the 13th of April at the time I cashed the draft. Mr. J. S. Caley said, I reside at Brook-street, near Brentwood, and keep an account at Messrs. Coutts and Co.'s. No part of the draft now exhibited to me was written by me, nor was anybody authorised by me to write it. For the prosecution—Do you know the prisoner? Witness—l cannot undertake to say that I 60. Do you know Mr. Lewis, the coroner? Witness—l know him very well. He resides at Brentwood. Here the draft was read. It was dated Brook•street, April 7, 1847, and was as follows: " Please to pay to John Caley, Esq., 2221. 15s. 6d., and place the same to the account of " J. S. CALEY. " To Messrs. Coutts and Co., bankers, Strand." There was an endorsement on the draft to the follow ing effect:—" Pay the contents, namely, 222 L 158. 6d., to George Chris. Anglican, of Wi m bl e d on Park, or bearer. John Caley, Jesus College, Oxford, April Bth, 1847." Witness in continuation—l have no relative of the name of John Caley. Mr. It. J. Sykes, clerk in the issue department of the Bank of England, said, I produce a 2001. note. On the 13th of April this note was brought to me to be changed, and I paid to the person who brought it 1501. in notes, and 501. in gold. I gave a ticket for the amount of the notes payable to " George," which appeared to me to be the surname of the person to whom the draft was payable. The writing of the name was bad and not very legible. Mr. J. Reece Adams, clerk in the issue department of the Bank of England, said—On the 13th of April I gave to Mr. Sykes, the last. witness, 1501. in bank notes, pay able to "George." We can produce the ticket, but I have here an extract, from a hich it appears that there were ten 10/. notes, numbered from 7,024 to 7,033 inclusive, and dated the ,10th of March, 1847, three Si. notes, 54.498 to 55,000 inclusive, and 60,651 to 60,657 inclu sive, dated the 13th of March, 1847. It was here stared for the prosecution that there was evidence to show an effort upon the part of the person who committed the offence to remove the track from the eye of detection by means of obtaining a cheque upon the Westminster Bank for several of the small notes which had been received at the bank. Mr. W. S. Higley, clerk to the London and Westmin ster Bank in Lothbury, agents to the North and South Wales Bank in Liverpool, was then called, and a cheque tor 1521., drawn by the North and South of Wales Bank upon the former establishment was handed to him. He said—This draft was presented on the 12th of May to me, and I think, but am not sure, that I saw the party , who presented it endor se it. I paid it, in two 50/. no t es and 52/. in gold. The not es were num b ered 87 237 and 90,585, but I cannot now men ti on t h e dates. ' Witham Sjamme Bott—l am in the employment of Mr. Dowdney, lailor, in Lombard -street. On the 14th of June I received a 401. note from the prisoner, Mr. Baugh, who has been for some time a custcmer of the house. I was to take 31. 19s. out of it, and I delivered it to Mr. George Dowdney, who went out and brought back ten 51. notes to me. I gave nine of those 51. notes to Mr. Baugh, and the difference between 31. 19s. and 51. I knew the name and aeldress of the prisoner; it was Mr. Baugh, Brentwood. In answer to questions from Mr. Wontner, the witness said the prisoner at once attended upon being informed of the circumstance of the alleged forgery; and when told that Mr. Bush was desirous to see him be took that gentleman's address, and expressed his immediate inten tion to call at the office of the solicitor to the bankers. Mr. E. Goodin?, clerk at the banking - house of Bar clay aril Co., of L om b ar d-street, said, Mr. Dowdney keeps au account at our house. I changed for Mr. Dowdney, on the 14th of June, a 50/. note, the number of which was 87.237, and the date the 6th of Jan., 1847. It was etae d ter the prosecution that the clerk of the North and South Wales Bank at Liverpool would come I 1 forward to prove that the cheque upon the Westminster . Bank was ,procured for the small notes which had been procured at the Bank of England; and it would be also distinctly shown that the prisoner had been in London and in Liverpool on the days the different transactions alluded to with rt spa 1 to the forgery took place. An application wai then made for a remand of the prisoner for a wet k. Mr. Wontner sf,id he had no objection to a short re mand of his client, but in fact there was no case against him. If Mr. Baugh was at all conscious of guilty know ledge of tha forgery, he certainly would not have gone to his tailor to change a note which had been received amongst the proceeds, neither would he have manifested a desire to go' to Mr. Bush when informed that the note was the subject of awkward inquiry. The prisoner was then remanded. A poor man brought to the Lord Mayor a Bank of England note which he said he had found at the corner of Coleman street, and requested that his Lordship woull act according to his ,judgment about it, for the finder was too poor to advertise it, and too much em ployed for his own living to search fcr the owner. The Loan Mayon said he had no doubt that some notice would be taken of the loss, and if the loser could be found, a recommendation should be made to him to reward the finder. CLERKENWELL. Johs Ramsay, a younz man of respectable appearance, was charged upon his own confession with the wilful murder of Mr. Henry Williams. The prisoner, who was described in the police-sheet as a cheesemonger, residing at No. 1, Matilda-place, Caledonian-road, Islington, on being put into the felons' dock, was in a very dejected state. Mr. Henry Williams, the deceased, who was alleged to have been murdered, was formerly an attorney, whose prin cipal practice was in the Customs and Excise, and he re sided in Constitution-row, St. Pancras. About two years and a half ago he had to conduct a case professionally in the Customs, and at its conclusion he accompanied some friends to a tavern in the Sparrow's-gate, near Tower hill, where they indulged freely, and the deceased left the place. He was afterwards found in the Miuories insensible, and bleeding from an injury immediately over his eye, and at an early hour in the morning he was driven up to the door of his residence in Constitution row.' He was quite insenale, saturated with blood, as was also the inside of the cabriolet. He was unable to sp tab ; and, after havime been put to bed, Dr. Fogarty, of Acton place, Begnigge Wells-road, was sent for, who promptly adopted every means that medical skill could devise, but Mr. Williams died shortly afterwards, in con sequence of the injury he had received. A coroner's jury was called, and, after an aeljournment, Inspector Penny traced the deceased to have been put into the cab and seen to the door of his house by a man named Strickland, who immediately afterwards left him. Strickland and the cabman were brought forward, but they could not give decided or satisfactory evidence as to the cause of the injury or death of the deceased, and the -übject being involved in mystery, the jury came to no decided verdict, leaving the matter open tor the pro duction of further evidence and future investigation. The injury over the eye must have been inflicted by a stick or umbrella. Ralph Rose, 248 G, now deposed, that on Tuesday night last, about twelve o'clock, he was on duty in Bag niege-wells station house, when the prisoner knocked at the door, which being opened by witness, he • requested to speak with him He was drunk at the time. Witness admitted him. and he said he had coarse there to deliver himself up for a murder which he had committed two years and a half ago. Witness took Mee into the charge room, when he said he had let a man on the head with a stick. He was in his company with another man named Strickland; and over since he had committed the crime he had not been able to rest. He said the deceased's name was Williams. An inquest had been held upon the body at the Silver Cup public-house, Crumer•street, St. Patients. Mr. ARNOLD.—Did he seem serious when he made this :statement ? Witness answered in the affirmative. He gave his name and address, John Ramsay, No. 1, Matilda- place, Caledo nian-road, Islington, cheesemonger. lle maintained the same sullenness all night that he now preserved in court, and was silent. Inspector Penny gave confirmatory testimony as to the statement made by the prisoner. Mr. ARNOLD—Have you been to make inquiries in reference to the matter? Inspector Penny— I have, your Worship, and ascertained that the prisoner is what he describes himself to be. I was present at the coroner's inquest on Mr. Williams. He was taken home wounded and covered with blood i❑ a cabriolet, and the jury re turned no verdict, leaving it open, in case any satisfac tory t vidence could he traced. I traced Strickland, and he gave evidence before the coroner's jury. lie is now a prisoner in the Queen's Bench Prison. The cabman who drove the deeetteed home gave evidence that he had taken deceased home from the Mtnories. Witness added that at seven o'clock yesterday morning - he went into the cell where the primmer was confined, and inquired whether he wished him to send for any refreshment, and should he send for his wife. The prisoner was sullen and replied, ‘. No, all the world will know it. They know it." He (the inspector), under an impression that the prisoner might be deranged in his intellect, in the course of the night sent for the police surgeon, when Mr. Sheehy attended, and decided that he was of sound intellect, but adv►sed that he should he cautiously watched in order to prevent self-violence, which was ob served all night. Mr. ARNOLD inquired whether the prisoner's wife had been conircuoicated with on the subject? Inspector Penny—Yes. your Worship, she is pres•nt. (The poor wife was in court much affected.) He said she had three children. She was formerly in the service of his Grace the Duke of Wellington -as kitchen-maid. She saved some money, and married the prisoner, when they set up in business as a cheesemonger in Chapel-,trees, Somers town. Her husband became acquainted with the deceased, and through him they were brought to ruin and bankruptcy, and were obliged to give up their busi ness about two years and a half ago, and ever since she had bean the chief support of herself and faintly by taking in washing. Mr. ARNOLD s'ked the prisoner if he wished to say anything to the charge? He could do as he thought proper; he was not bound to say anything. The prisoner declined saying anything. Mr. A RNOLD—TiP , O I shall remand you for a-week. The prisoner was then locked up in a state of dejec tion, when he requested an interview with his wife. Mr. ARNOLD directed it to be granted, and she was taken into the gaoler's room by Inspector Penny, and, accom panied by Mr. Sheehy. The prisoner kissed her, and they both shed tears. After a short interval they were separated. Mr. ARNOLD directed Inspector Penny to make every possible inquiry about the extraordinary matter between this and the next examination, which he promised to do. In the courio of the day the prisoner was conveyed to prison in the police van. MARLBUROUGH-STREET. Joseph Mar,hall was placed before Mr. Bingham, charged with bein4 found in the pantry of the residence of Anthony Pereira, Esq., N 0.7, Park-crescent, Regent's. park, with intent to commit a felony. Langton Butler, a footman in the service of coin- . _ plainant, stated, that having occasion to enter the pantry 'at nine o'clock that morning he was surprised to find the prisoner standing near the plate chest, containing up wards of 5,000/. worth of silver plate. Witness asked him what he wanted there? The prisoner replied that he merely called to know if they had any bottles to sell. Witness, who was not satisfied with the prisoner's ex planation, detained him till the butler came, who searched the prisoner and looked over the plate, but found nothing missing or on the prisoner. Witness, at the request of the butler, went for a constable, who took the prisoner into custody. The prisoner, in defence, said he was a hawker of bottles, and called in the way of business at No. 7, Park crescent. He was an honest man, and worked hard for his living, and denied the imputation of intending to COMMA a felony. BINGUAM said his answer to the charge did no• satisfy him; he must, therefore, remand him till Satur• day next. WORSHIP-STREET. John Watling, a young man, 20 yeats of age, was charged with wiFuily setting fire to his ma'ter's pre mises, Mr. De S-,x, wadding manufacturer, Montague street, Spite',fields. From the evidence it appeared that, on Tuesday week, the prisoner was observed by a lad named Wil liams to leave the premises in a hurried manner, and immediately a fire burst out. A great portion of the budding cud property' were ch-stro3, ed. Mr. Superintendent Franklin, of the Basingstoke con stabulary, stated that the prisoner earl , to ban and said that he was desirous of giving himself into custody r having set fire to his mater's house. He did not appear to know where the premises were situated, nor the name of the owner thereof, but said that he had acci denedly let fall a lucifer-match, by which he was about to light his pipe, among a lot of tow which had ignited; and seeing that the premises were likely to be set on fire, he hastened his escape therefrom. He. however, denied all intention of wilfully seeing the house on fire. Mr. De Sax said that stuoking was strictly prohibited not only in his, but in all factories of the like nature. His confirmed impression was that the prisoner had wil fully set fire to the premises with gunpowder. Mr. Arnold remanded the prisoner, in order to give all parties the required time for the production of further evidence on so serious a charge. THAMES. In justice to the police-sergeant No. 5 11, who was accused of grossly improper conduct in a case reported from this court in The Sun of yesterday, and which evidence was given on oath, it is proper to state that Inspector Scott having, by direction ofthem t a h g a i t st t r h a e t r e e , iustituted inquiries, reported to the magistrate was no foundation whatever for the accusation. SOUTHWARK. M ary Ann W es t w as charged with stealing a purse, containing a 51. Bank of England note, five sovereigns, and a cheque for 33L Bs. 7d. from Mr. Thomas Romans, Cotton's Wharf, Toolepatreet; and John Bedford and Churles Burrell, two respectable-looking young men, described as holding situations in the City, were charged with aiding and assisting in the robbery. The complainant stated that about half past eleven o'clock on the preceding night, as be was walking along the Dover-road, the prisoner West came up to him, and wanted to prevail upon him to ac company her home. He refused, and she then thrust one of her hands into his trousers' pocket, and pulling out his purse, ran away. He was in the act of proceeding after her when he was seized by two men, who came from the opposite side of the way and held him, although he struggled, until the woman bad got out of sight by running dcwn one of the adjacent streets. The two men they ran away themselves in the direction of St. G.orge's Church, and be went up to a tradesman standing at his door, and told him that he had been robbed, when the former took him to a house in Swan street close by, where he saw the female prisoner, and gave her into custody. He added, that he subsequently went into the White Hart Inn in the )3orough, where - so , .0* he had not been long before the two other prisoner $ r h il ; tered, and on seeing them he he believed them tot 0 men who held him while the prisoner who robbe it h i ; escaped, and he called in two policemen and ma le ~e charge against them ; but they were liberated At station-house, the landlord of the White Hat t .Lm ~ having undertaken that they should appear t Su' police-court. In reply to Mr. SECKER, the complainant said b st .°/ suspected the prisoners were the men, from theft !or llpearance, although he admitted he had not an op A nity of distinguishing their features ; that he Pau bt e is drinking, but he was perfectly capable of knotain he was about. said Mr. James Hughes, the tradesman alluded tA that while standing at the door he observed a talking to the complainant at a short distance ol afterwardshe saw her run away and turn into . P_ - aft ; street. He also observed two men stop the corn ph "'"., - ; ft as he was going after the woman, and they als o as away towards the Borough. Thinking that th e w O tt had entered a house of ill fame in S w an- s t ree t (11.°• Xi he took the complainant there, and they f Duna ,Z pr woman in the kitchen with the landlady a nd s e on e n e woman, with her bonnet and shawl on, just tas• 11 ,„ 5 4 0 hid recently come there. The witness add e d, tb stP - t e, his observation of the woman while she stood tit; Og g) the complainant in the road he believed the pris. me r ▪ ge be the same woman. He, however, could not um lewi ft to say that the two young men charged with the rescue were the men he saw stop the comp 10 112-- when he was pursuing the thief. pear The two young men referred to said that th t — em s plainant was quite mistaken with regard to th em ; they had been at the fancy fair held at the L ▪ g Victuallers' Asylum, in the Kent-road, on the pre day, which they left at a l a te hour, an d go t on an o ls „ . c ; bus at the Shard Arms in the K en t roa d, f rom they alighted in the Borough, opposite to the 1 1 Hart Inn, which they entered, a n d h a d no t b ee: 2 10 0gde there before this extraordinary accusation was ; 113 against them. Mr. Henry Brown, the landlord of the White 0, Inn, said, the complainant entered his house about e ic h past twelve o'clock on the preceding night, at P 1 4 0 time the two young men, one of whom was hi a Vi f landlord's) relation, were sitting at supper. Sue le lea ft the complainant started up, said he was going out O r o ' short time, and returned with four policeme a charged the young men with assisting in the rc Ili The witness said that both the young men were h respectable, and quite incapable of being conces such an offence as that with which they were chat :, ft g Policeman 250 M said, that he saw the t wo y 0 11; men alight from a Greenwich omnibus oppo t i to White hart Inn, which they entered together. ..,40 In reply to Mr. SECKER, the policeman said th , few t , • prisoner was searched at the station-house, an, 1 413 , ~/ half-crown piece found in her possession. The hOu which she was taken, however, was not search*. „ fte e, Mr. SECKER said that, under all the circutat . o ‘ ," t b• be should discharge the two young men and reore an other prisoner for further examination. Tilt SUN: . MARKET NEWS.-(YESTERE 10) UAY 2VX13.1Z RE TS • SMITHFIELD.— Old Meadow Hay, 3/5s to 4/ 49; :"el y ditto to 2/ 5s to 3155; Old Clover, 41 to 5155; New d it tot.,lf f -4/; and Straw, 11 12s to 11 16s per load. A limi 5 " . and a steady trade. Aref CUMBERLAND.—OId Meadow Hay, 3/ 109 to 4 1 ss; A ;ttes ditto, 21 8s to 31 83 ; Old Clover, 4/ to 5/; - o' l ,p r — o de 3/ to 41; and Straw, 1/ 14s to 1/ 16s per loa d • '- firm, at the above quotations. jjelt WHITECHAPEL.—OId Meadow Hay, 3/ 5s to 4 1/ 49 ; A ittOt ditto, 21 18s to 3i 89; Old Clover, 414 s to 5/ ss; i J. 3/ to 41; and Straw, 1/ 12s to 1/ 16s per loot .13. 3 L'jijp and Straw, the s u pply o f w hi c h was sma ll, moved ofil',ote"- at very full prices. MEAT MARIEETS. Offl SOErTIIALL, JULY 14.—Th e supp l y o f f a t s t oc k On sea being on the increase, the general demand was hei 1 0 41 prices had a downward tendency. Beef, f rom 3 s 00: 1 10d Mutton, 4s to 5s 2d ; Lamb, 5s to 5s 10d ; 1 7'e to 4s 8d ; and Pork, 4s 2d to 4s 8d per 81bs. ROMFORD, JULY 14.—We had a very slow tra. 1 ot r morning owing to the hot weather, at a d e cline in the Ai l oc ; ; tions of quite 2d per Blbs. Beef, from 3s 8d to 4s. 45 10 Mutton, 4s to .5s 2d ; Lamb, 5s to 6s ; Veal, .04 4s 8d ; and Pork, 4s 4d to 4s 8d per Slbs. S:31101 Calves, 18s to 28s; Quarter-old Store Pigs, 17s t 0 and Milch Cows, with their small Calf, 16/ to 19/ e sw - 4i LEWES, JULY 13.—Beef, from 4s to sa; Mutt o'ol 4d to 6s 2d; Lamb, 5s to 6s ; Veal, 4s to 4s Bdt . 1 jag Pork, 4s to 4s 8d per 81bs. A mo;:erate supply , an d. trade. NEW GATE AND 7.7FIADEATELELIA. . dof A very inactive demand was exp er i ence d f or eac h fl s "c,di Meat, at barely stationary pric e s B ee f, f rom 3 s 6d to. 10 4 Mutton, 4; to se; Lamb, 4s 10d to 5s 10d ' • Vea1,, ,5 : 0 ,0 to 4s 10d; and Pork, 3s 101 to 4s 10d per Blbs,by the cal CORN AVERAGES. GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRITISH COF 11. 0 0 For the Week ended July 15, 1847, made up from the RCtUTI 1 0 ypie In.pectors in the different Cities and Towns in Eagland aL 4 per Imperial Quarte 04 0 r. O. WHEAT- I BARLEY. I OATS. I 1 RYE. BEANS. 1 RPICE .. 182 s 3d 48s 8d 3is 11d 6ls 9d I 535 Od t igv " 1 The Duties on Foreign Grain are now suspended. LLOYD'S SHIPPING. 1,161* LONDON, JULY 15.—Wind E.N.E., light breeze an . with sultry weather. 1 . 0 DEAL, JULY 14.—Wind S. to S.S.E., light.—Arrei• CA of the River, and sid., Norman, Manilla; Agincourt, r CAVA Good Hope and Calcutta ; Apame, Algoa Bay; • New Orleans. OFF TORBAY, JULY 13.—China, Cape of Ha ai dvrq,a Marquis of and lcyl dul:elbsadetacal;Tel z,:a:.lrt.;3.llJll,oahßnlanerNiscb,l'a:Nl,yle:FwgiliOlißoto.trGn—eionrAoeNsdawreiril.idwc.:o:l.l:7`irtienrallita:i LIVERPOOL, JULY 14.—Wind fie Importer, Queb,r, ; Enchantress, Bathurst. 14. „. otiii reff, Adelaide, South :Australia ; P e t ere l, Af r i ca; L a dy 1 1 ., j 5r . - i f. Halifax; Scipio, and A:ary Campbell, Quebec; Cora, foundland. Off port, Nautilus, Virginia; Crown, rii.rent The Emerald hence to Halifax was totally lost at Lonisblit o t 30th ult. ; crew saved. The Eliza, Runcorn, to Port .Ns d a ij from wis in contact this morning with the Prince: s( In „ to steamer) Dublin, lost main mast, and was cut dow: r r the water's edge and hrt tight in here by the latter, ceived damage to her. eutwater. idadri 4 SOUTHAMPTON, JULY 14. —Wind W.— Arrcl. steamer, eeks, Gibraltar, left sth inst., Cadiz 7th, Id' 9rb, Oporto 10th, and Vigo 11th. W ill' FALMOUTH, JULY 14.—Wind N.—Off port, 13 , Prince Edward's Island. d it to; CLYDE, JULY 14 —Arrd. Zebulon, Thomson. Ne fif , it tol land ; Medora, M'Pherson, Trinidad ; Brenda, ItPLeo d, too; William, Lyon, ditto; 13, Druid, MiKirdy, Perna' del' Mary Morris, Dagget, New York. Ski. Nashua, I"' phia OFT SALCOMBE, JuLY 11.—Medora, Constant, Sing t. 13, Hanseal, Suand, for W.Amburgh, with 3,000 born e ' - ' . . Prince, Quebec. 12, E ger t on , H on d uras. ( 100 MILI'oRD, JULY 13.—Wind W.—A rr d. P em b ro ke Williams, Quebec, for Pembroke. ~dioor j BRISTOL, JULY 14 —Wind W.—Arrd. Mathilda, P,ibeti* New York. Sld. 13, Supply, Newfoundland. 14, Yarmouth, N.S. _ RAISING THE BLOCKADE OF 0F0RT0.,47. " Portuguese Consulate, London, July 14, i w e ifeu Sir,--I beg to inform you that I have to day re , orders from her Most Faithful Majesty's Minister s rt of Court, to make known that the blockade of the P? 0 tO Oporto has been raised, as per an official communicatl y that effect published in the Gazette de Mach id, deed the All the ports are now open. I am, Sir, yOur most obedient servant, (Signed) F. J. VANZELL O" " To W. Dobson, Esq., Lloyd's." 0 0 STEAM-BOAT COLLISION.—A collision occur: - t iiit Tuesday in the river, near Northfleet, betwee n Ac d, Satellite and the Eclipse. Both boats were erovi:et,, when they were seen coming into immediate 0 911 7 0 0 The crash was dreadful. The bowsprit of the one 01 into the near bow of the other; all were in the al s o consternation. Many were for throwing thernsebile overboard, believing that both boats would lurch s' W A fal and sink; others were fainting; most were in dr esu confusion; but, worst of all, one of the passenge r9 :ol young person, who was near the bow, had his leg of thigh smashed by the violent stroke of the up boat. . 4 0, vessels, however, with th e except i on o f t h e boviSP,be paddle-box, &c., escaped unhurt. At Gravesend,: n o poor sufferer was got o n s h ore , w h ere every atte l3 ' l l - 40 was paid him by the mast er of th e p oor h ouse , and ale, by Mr. Grimshaw, surgeon, who, as soon as posPv' amputated the limb near the thigh. LoriGrouD, SATURDAY.—COMMITTAL OF RAO ° PRATT, ESQ., BARRISTER. AT-LAW.—Randall Pratt, P,l, , ' a hi ,, hly respectable gentlemen resident in this coati' ) , .• and a barrister, was brought into this town ill, ,i cO9 at vdy of the police, and lodged in gaol, ehargea.ol shooting at and severely wounding a man 11.— his Lanahan, who WlB gam-keeper to Colonel Pratt' e lf cou,in. The man is out of danger, although B ell w( unded. airD4sl4 [ D RTISR MENT.] —A CURE OF A LIVER OW or OF LONG STANDING BY HOLLOWAY'S PILLS.--Jarnee Temple-street, Bristol, h the liver complaint more TaL7 t years ; he was in Bath Ho a sp d ital seyeral months, but eurau.. - be O r , weaker state than when he went in. Afterwards at Syvaino,l o. calved the best attention of the medical men at two instit uti° l l derived no benefit. Being unable to do sufficient work to Xe c n Y o of he returned to his friends at Bristol, and commenced t il l n e - rfe e Holloway's gills, which in three months restored WM L' 1 ; 50 0. health. He is now working constantly at his trade as s Lnioneo" Sold by all Druggists, and at FroleSsor liolloway's Estabwr 244, Strand, London. BIRTHS. _ dr e" , th e On the 14th inst., in Montagu-place, Hassell-01' wife of Joseph Aldridge, Esq., of a daughter. On the 7th inst., at Alton, the wife of Louis Leslie , of a daughter, sll. born. tl l6 On the 1 lth i ti nst., iu Westbourne-terrace, Hyde-P ar lady of Thomas Faulconer, Esq., of a daughter. Sasoe/4 On the 12th inst., at Pickford Lodge, Ticehurst , the lady of C. E. Hayes Newington, Esq., M.D., 4 2,.f. a ldifie* On the 12th inst, at Glassel, Upper Banchory, g eon shire, North Britain, the lady of Jchn Michell, Eeck, Of and heir. On the 13th inst., the lady of E. Edmonds, jun' , 9 ~ Bradford, Wilts, of a daughter. °I. j On the 14th inst., at Haling-park, Croydon, the wife Giles, Esq., of a son. MARRIED. Willia m On the 12th inst., at Hove Church, near Brightout 13 • 0104 Hare, Esq., of King-street, Cheapside, to Miss Eliza et Bedford-square, Brighton. DIED. AO' On the 17th of April last, on board the Troubadour/ T tenant liibernicus Scott, Bombay Artillery. jots On the 7th inst., at Rye, Rhoda Jane, w id o w m ',— Richard Weeden Butler, aged 71. On the Bth inst., Mr. William Ambrose Riches, a IT .PP er • Charles -street, Parliament. street, Westminster. Elea On the 10th inst., at Heron Villa, Worcestershire, Ed.-- nary Bradney, the wife of Captain Powell, R.N. Ada' On the 10th inst., at Bishopstoke, Hants , R oar- Colquitt, aged 71. c+Anlif On the Ith inst., at Leeds, the Rev. William .'.-- AlollCli. go b. On the 11th inst., in Wellclose-square, Mr. T hongs buck, aged 78. o f portisP d ‘ On the 13th inst., Mrs. Edward blondes, place, Islington, aged 78 02, t one on : Printed and Published by =EDO YOUNG, of ..°4;oloct Su and, Printer, at The Sun Office, N 0.112. Strivad, In the, 1/ of the Savoy, to tb. County of Middlesex, Faith 1847.