The Sun. — London, England, 1832-07-04 00:00:00

SPIRIT OP THE PUBLIC JOURNALS The B : shop of Exeter cut rather an awkward figure last night. He was again at his old trick of quoting letters. On the authority of a letter which he said he had seen, written by a member of the Church of Scotland to a friend of his, he did not scruple to charge the Solicitor-Genetal for Scotland with having been guilty of a trick, in order to mislead the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. This naturally Ird the Lord Chancellor, to whom the Solicitor-General waF, well known, to vindicate his absent friend. and to express his astonishment that the Right Rev. Father in God should so soon, after the detection of his former liberties with letters, yen t,:re on a fresh accusation. The Right Rev. Father in God not only stated himself that which was not true, for the sake of producing an impression against Ministers ; hut by his con fident manner, he seduced the Duke of Bucking ham into a confirmation of his fiction. What a-tonishes us is, that the Right Rev. Father in God should have dared in that House even to toention the word fetter. Many a man, it is to he hoped, after such an exposure, would have had the grace to bury himself in seclusion ; and few, with the memory of the affair so fresh, would have ventured to provoke the chastisement which h e received in so signal a manner last night. For the cake of establishing a connexion between Nliniqers and a certain newspaper,the Right Rev. Father in God charged them with having com• municated to that newspaper a certain confiden tial letter, written by the Duke of Buckingham to the King, and which appeared verbatim in in its columns. Having appealed to the Duke ot Buckingham, his Grace actually stated that that letter had appeared almost verbatim in the paper, although he had never given a copy of it to any one, and had shown it to only two in dividuals. It turned out, that of this letter, said to have appeared verbatim in the newspaper in queqion, not one word even was printed in it. The letter had merely been alluded to by a correspondent, under the signature of " Radi cal." The Bishop of Exeter added last night to his former offence by his mode of defending himself If he had confessed his sin, admitted that he was tempted by the devil to make the charge against Ministers, in the hope that no (hie would thihk of doubting the truth of what was so con fidently stated by a Bishop, this would have been something like an atonement for the trans gression. But he materially aggravated his of fence by a denial of a statement made before so numerous an assembly, and respecting which all the reports agree. As this defence is quite a curiosity in its way, we shall here give it, with a vi'w of enabling those who are so inclined to institute a comparison between the Apostles and their descendant in the see of Exeter:— " He lagged to state that he had said no such thing. He had only put a question. Their Lords ips would re collect. that hat they were talking about occurred three months ago ; and it became no man to he confident of the extreme accuracy of his recoll-ction. He would, however, state wish confidence, that he believed he had qualified all he had then said. He had never said that he believed it himself; but he had said that it was believed by other per ?.oris, that th-re was a connexion between that paper and the Government, and that blief gave to the opinions ex pri ssed in that piper a pecular weight. He had stated that he believed the contrary, but that such was tie belief of whets." We have neither leisure nor space at present for the thing ; but we shall take the first oppor tunity of placing the passage in the speech of the Bishop, charging Ministers with the communi cation of the letter of the Duke of Buckingham to the Times, in juxta position with the above memorable denial that he ever made such a charge. Well might Lord Grey, after this exhibition, de clare that he felt only disgust at the time, and now he felt nothing but contempt."—(Hear, hear.) We know not whether the Marquess of Salisbury really thought the conduct of the Bishop of Exeter venial, or maliciou:sly intended to attract a more marked attention to the expres sion of contempt of the Premier. He " called upon the House to mark the language of the Prime Minister. The charge he had made was not very suitable to the dignity of the House. The Noble Earl bad for the first time, he believed, said he felt contempt for a Member of the Right Rev. Bench. He called upon the House to protect the Right Rev. Bench." In charity to the Marquess of Salisbury, we are ttclined to believe that his own notions of the conduct of the Right Reverend Father in God tin not differ materially from those of Earl Grey. We should be sorry to suppose that he thinks tightly of the offence brought home in so marked tuanner to the Bishop. The Noble Marquess, !.00, knows that the House cannot protect the Right Reverend Bench, or any member of that Bench, or any Member of the House, spiritual or temporal, from the consequences which ne cessarily follow the detection of such an attempt as that in question. The Bench themselves have too much respect for the nation to attempt to mix themselves up with the unfortunate member of their body. We trust the example of the Bishop of Exeter w;411 be a warning to others, not to allow thetrielves, for the sake of effecting any object, to -venture on questionable means in the hope do% the trick may not be discovered. 6Thch an r.:xarnple may be of inestimable benefit. Great men are like lights set on a hill ; the eyes of are fixed on them. The Bishop of Exeter may in his way do more to improve the Inorals of the nation than has ever yet been done by any Bishop. The father, when he sees his son inclined to presume on the ignorance of others, will naturally point his attention to the Bishop of Exeter ; and the Right Rev. Father in God, serving to _ _ Point amoral dna adorn a tale," may draw many more to virtue than any of his predecessors have done by their inspirations in the pulpit or their apostolical virtues in private lite.—Morning Chronicle. A conversation of some interest on the sub ject of our foreign relations took place last night in the House of Lords. The extraordi nary mission to St. Petershurgh of so distin guished an individual as the Lord Privy Seal, affords of itself a strong presumption that the peace of Europe is at present seriously threat ened. It was natural and justifiable, therefore, that Members of the Opposition should be de sirous of eliciting information on a subject of such deep importance. It was said of a great writer, that whatever he touched he adorned ; and it may be said, with as much truth, of the Mar quess of Londonderry, that whatever he meddles with he embroils. He afforded last night some evidence of his talent in this way. It may be supposed that the diplomatic qualifications of the Noble Marquess being so well-known on the Continent, what he says in Parliament will not be deemed of much consequence elsewhere ; but foreigners, knowing that the Duke of Wellington and other Opposition Peers were present during the conversation, will naturally infer that the Marquess was, on this occasion, the organ of his party. The Noble Marquess, alluding to the extraordinary mission, naturally enough con cluded that it would nut have been resorted to, Mr. motion, but lltrpngty 311i0.t0d70-6'- had not some great emergency arisen ; and he hoped that the emergency did not spring from the indiscreet and intem.)erate conduct of some oc the Noble Earl's (Grey's) friends, who, in their great zeal for Reform, carried it to the ex tent of applying in another place opprobrious epithets to a powerful Sovereign, with whom this country was in alliance ; and with whom he honed it would long continue to be. —(Cheers.) He regretted that such st a t ements s h ou ld go forth to the world—that there was so little recollection of the past services of this (Treat Emperor, and of the illustrious brother of the individual now occupying the Russian throne. He repeated, that he much regretted such expressions had gone forth ; and he hoped the Lord Privy Seal was sent to Russia for the purpose of softening them, and doing away with the effect which they were calculated to pro- duce." The extraordinary Mission, as all the world knows, had been announced some days before the discussion on the motion of Mr. Cutlar Fermisson in the Huuse of Commons; but the Noble Marquess soon showed that he was aware of the object of the Mission, for he asked " Whether the King of Holland hail acquiesced in the decision of the other Powers —or whether there v.'as any probability of his consent being obtainrd " "If (he added) the Noble Earl was indisposed to reply to these questions, he could not but think that the Mis sion to St. Petersbufgh arose out of new dif ficulties which had arisen with respect to the ar rangement of the affairs of Belgium. He hoped the Noble Earl would be able to give him a sa tisfactory answer, especially with regard to the Belgian question, on the settlement of which the peace of Europe hung." And then, by way of contributing to the preservation of the peace of Europe, this censurer of the intemperate lan guage used in the House of Commons, who hoped that the Lord Privy Seal was sent out to Russia to do away with the effect of such in temperate language, with admirable consistency recommends to the King of Holland a course which, if he follows, must disturb the peace of Europe ! "He highly admired," he said, " the magnanimous and the courageous manner in which the Kin g of H o ll an d had withstood the menaces which had been thrown out against him, and the attempts made by the Five Powers to deprive him of his just rights. There was something so truly courageous in this, that he should not fail to give full expression to his own opinions on this subject when the proper oc casion arrived." The Duke of Wellington, and the rest of the opposition Peers pre,ent, listened to this language without expressing their disapprobation of it. The Duke of Welling ton, indeed, took care to "express his entire conviction that his Imperial Majesty (of Rus sia) had performed every article of the treaties to which he was bound, so far as he (the Duke of Wellington) had any acquaintance with them." His Grace has some notion that the Govern ment are not altogether satisfied with the manner in which the Emperor of Russia has performed the obligations of the treaties to which he was bound ; and in volunteering this opinion, he wishes to embarrass Ministers in Russia, and to add to the difficulties in which his ally, the Marquess of Londonderry, wished to involve them, by his praise of the conduct of the King of Holland. In fact, the Opposition wish to let it be known to the despotic Powers, that were there a change of Ministry in this country, England would support the King of Holland and Don Miguel, and abet the conduct of the Emperor of Russia towards the Poles. We are far from ap proving of the language used in the House of Commons, in speaking of the Emperor of Russia. It was well observed by Earl Grey— " That ther, was a respect due to foreign Sovereigns which ought to be preserved.—(Hear, hear.) He bail stated this on other occasions, and he certainly must tie precve all language of that kind.—(Cheers.) It was not consistent with the dignity of Parliament—it was injurious to the interests of the country—it created difficulties where there were none previous y—azg; avated those which already existed.—(Cheers ) No one could disapprove or regret more deeply than himself the use of language calculated to give great offe..ce to foreign Powers." England ought to make herself felt in an other way than by a display of Billingsgate. — The occasions are few, indeed, in which the Members ofa British Parliament are at all justified in entering on the affairs of foreign countries, and they are still fewer in which they are jus tified in holding, on such imperfect informa tion as they must possess, the language of abuse and invective. But the Duke of Wel lington, not content with disapproving of the intemperate language of the House of Commons, runs into the other extreme of lauding the Em peror of Russia, and lauding him at a time, too, ,‘ hen even the fettered press of Germany ex claims against the " detestable measure" of car rying off children to Russia from Poland. In our extracts from the German papers, in another column, our readers will see that this new and unheard-of cruelty drove the wretched Poles to the resistance of despair, and that even the Rus sians themselves have become reluctant to carry the unnatural mandate into execution. The partiality of the Noble Duke for the " Illustri ous Individual" is, however, sufficiently intelli gible. Woe to the nation which should have no other protection than the tender mercies of his Grace, or the illustrious subject of his pa negyric. Earl Grey, with regard to the mission, confined himself to the stating " that circum stances so important had occurred as to make it appear advisable to his Majesty's Ministers to send that mission." He censured in strong terms the mischievous conduct of the Marquess of Ltaidonderry, who, while professing a love for peace, endeavoured to encourage the King of Holl an d to act i n suc h a manner as to render war inevitable.—Morning Chronicle. It is to be feared that matters may not go off smoothly, between his Majesty's Government and that large majority of the people of Ireland who hare resolved against any further payment of tithes. The fact is, that the conflictin g par ties are at war on grounds which appear to he utterly irreconcilable. Turning to the second report of the tithe committee, the recommenda tions of which have, we believe, been largely adopted by Mr. Stanley, and therefore to be embodied in several acts of Parliament on his proposition, we find that a leading object of the committee with regard to tithes, is to make the composition under Lord Wellesley's Bill " per manent and compulsory." Now what is the state of Ireland in respect of agreements under the Composition Act ? Why, that since the anti-tithe spirit became general, tithes com pounded for under that act have been just as ill-paid (that is, not paid at all), as where the parishioners are still exposed to the rough hand ling of the tithe proctor and his drivers. I t i s easy to say, make the composition " compul sory." Nothing is easier than to draw up a bill by which the parishioners, refusing to sign an agreement, shall incur even penalties, if the clergy should so insist. But what then? You may compel to sign, but can you compel the payment! A power as strong as legal ingenuity can invent is now, and has for years been resorted to, to en force the liquidation of arrears of tithe. Dis tresses innumerable have been levied under it. But buyers cannot be created by statute. Here. then, is a right recognised which cannot be en forced ; for it is met by another right which cannot be impeached—the right of refusing to purchase a commodity presented to us ; and in that consists the whole power which has been cp posed to the payment of tithe in Ireland. But it is an omnipotent power, for by it the tithe system has been already crushed, and no Act of Parlia ment that we ever heard of can restore it. While Ministers, then, are bustling with Committees, and labouring to suggest convenient rules and forms, in correspondence with which the clergy are to receive their tithe, it is quite lament.ble to observe, what, indeed, is manifest,—that the question has been settled by the Irish themselves upon the spot,—Protestant and Catholic alike declarin g th a t th e y will p a y no arrear o f tithe ; that they will not pay tithe at all, en nonzine, nor a substitute for it ; and, therefore, that his Majesty's Government may spare itself the trouble of making so many dexterous ar rangements for the pertnanency and compul siveness of Composition Acts, or for the recovery of their dues by cl e r g y m en of the Esta bliThed Church. It is not surprising that men's meditations should become confused, when they see with dimmed organs through a dark, yet party-coloured, medium. The Duke of Wel lington and Lord Eldon descanted the other night, when Lord Roden brought in his strange Irish motion upon the necessity of maintaining private property (meaning tithe), and of putting down the general conspiracy of the Catholics against the loyal people (meaning the Orange men) of Ireland. Now will these noble Peer , informs us, specifically, what ought to be done? Can you (once more) force people to buy cows, homes, or pigs, which they have unanimously resolved they will not purchase ? If the answer he in the negative, then is the tithe system dead and buried ; and, with grief we say, the present destitution of the Protestant clergy is altogether incapable of relief, except by charity or by a pay ment from the Consolidated Fund which must be continued from year to year, or the distress of these reverend and deserving persons will of ne cessity return. Enforce the law ! Against whom ?—a whole community ? Can such a process be executed ? This is the true hone for the le g islative body. When 6,000,000 or 7,000,000 of men declare that their ob- jection is not to tithe alone, but to any payment —no matter of what description—to a class of ecclesiastics who render them no kind of spiritual service, it seems idle for Parliament to waste the public time on the details of mea sures, of which the purpose is to direct how that shall be done, the doing of which is obviously impracticable. Upon this rock, we fear, it is that the Ministerial policy for the tranquilliza tion of Ireland will be shipwrecked. As for plans of commuting tithe hereafter, explained at some length in the report referred to and in the evidence, they may be very wise, and good, and useful ; but, in the mean time, the country is on fire, and what is to be done ? Lord Plun kett's speech, on Monday night, was an able re• ply to Lord Roden and the Duke of Wellington, the latter of which Noble Peers and Learned Lords transfixed, with little appearance of com passion. Last night, in the House of Lords, a severe lesson was read the Bishop of Exeter for the haste and vehemence with which he brought a serious charge against the Govern ment, on what he now allows was mere hearsay. The Reverend Lord will probably hereafter have a more correct notion of the duties of a Chris- tian Prelate, than to prefer a criminal charge on unexamined and unfounded rumour. His Lord ship's opinion of us we value not:at one straw ; but for the sake of the church of which he is a pillar we recommend him to put off with all conve nient speed that polemical violence of character, which, however befi'ting his former profession of a political controversialist, ill becomes the office of a father of the church.—Times. The feeling—deep, intense, and almost una- nimous— which has, at length, manifested itself in the House of Commons on the melancholy subject of the wrongs of Poland, and the unex ampled atrocities of the Czar towards that gallant nation, must afford the greatest gratification to every Englishman who feels for the honour of his country ; but it is nut in the hearts of the Englishme n alone that the feeling, which breathes a holy hatred of injustice and op pression, will find a response ; it will be re echoed in every region and in every country of the globe where there are minds animated with a generous solicitude for the cause of civilization and the interests of humanity. To ourselves, who, from the beginning of the Polish struggle for independence, have end eavoure d to o btain sympathy and justice for a people who are so well entitled to the one by their sufferings, and to the other by their virtues, it is a source of peculiar pleasure to find that the warmest ex pressions of our attachment to the cause of Po land, and of our indignation for the conduct of her treacherous and merciless desolators, have been equalled by the glowing language of the Commons of England, describin g the wrongs of a people as full of glory as of misfortune, and reprobating with all the eloquence of honest feeling the savage cruelty and exhaustless malice of the tyrant who loads his ill-got rriumph with every crime that revenge suggests, as if to make more odious in the eyes of the civilized world the ignominy of his success. We recur to this sub ject at present because we observe that an attempt is already made, by a paper in whose eyes the equivocal public character of Lord Palmerston is very precious, to render the sympathy of the House of Commons for Poland a barren feeling, which is to have no practical result. We are gravely told by that Journal that Austria and Prussia, being parties to the treaty of Vienna, are as much bound to insist upon the fulfilment of that treaty as England. No doubt of it. But it would be just as sapient, and as much to the purpose, to tell us that Russia is as much bound as England to abide by the terms of the ireaty of Vienna. in the crime of the robbery of the rights of Poland Russia was certainly the prin cipal felon, but Prussia and Austria were the accomplices. They originally partook of the booty, which they still keep. The one holds Posen as its share of the crime-stained spoil_ the other holds Galicia by the same title of fel°. mous violence. Yet the evening organ of our Government suggests that, as Prussia and Austria are as much bound by the obligation s of the treaty of Vienna as England is, we should take no step towards obtaining redre ss f or Poland, unless with their concurrence a n d co operation. What ! is England to sacrifi ce h er s h ol on e o m u n r, tr a e t a id ty, tio)ecaalurasnedootnhetr p he ar obligation s o f a have scandal o usly violated tt ? or ar e we to ask the ac com pli ces in the robbery to join us in ob taining redress of the principal offender ? What a simple nation they must take us to be if we did, particularly if we made the performance of ow own duty dependent upon their consent ! This bright thought, in whatever quarter it find• a tongue, is certainly worthy of having emanated from the Secretary of the Foreign Department, who made some allusion of the sort, though not very distinctly, on Mr. Fergusson's motion. By the hint thrown out as to the cooperation of Austria and Prussia in obtaining redress for Po land, are we to be prepared for the doings of a new London Conference, and the establishment of a new manufactory of protocols and treaties, wanting nothing but to be ratified and enforced, and deeds of political settlement never to be set tled, and " final and irrevocable" decisions invariably revoked ? No, no. The country is heartily sick of the Holy Alliance and its diplomatic jugglery. Lord Palmerston may have the most amiable credulity in the promises of the Russian autocrat, who speaks of peace while he collects throughout all his vast domi• nions—no doubt with the most pacific inten tions—all the elements of war. We do not, like a Ministerial Morning Paper, attempt to account for this confiding simplicity on his Lordship's part by describing him as an "imbecile, or something worse ;'' but we do say that the in terests and honour of England require that the department of Foreign Affairs should be, at a crisis like this, under the direction of a clearer capacity, a more vigorous mind, and a more English spirit, than Lord Palmerston has ever displayed. What can be said of a Minister of Great Britain who, after all the horrible atrocities that Russia has committed, both in the kingdom of Poland, and in those provinces which, from similar provocation, took a part in the conflict for independence, gravely tells the House of Commons that the " policy of Russia is to conciliate the feelings of the people of Poland." To conciliate ! So, when we see him, after annihilating the national existence of the people of whom the perfidious C ►therine planned the destruction ;—when we see him dragging Nobles in chains, with hair shaved, and in the garb of convict felons, to the mines of Siberia ; when we see his myrmidons sparing neither age nor sex—tearing the child from the mother's breast to make the hero's offspring a slave of the desert ; inflicting torture and degradation on women ; endeavouring to trample out and ex tinguish the very language of the deliverers of Austria and of Europe ; using an amnesty as a snare to entrap the victims of perfidy to their destruction, and endeavouring to efface every vestige of what Poland was by pouring over it the sweeping tide of social and moral desolation, we must not express the natural horror which such conduct excites in the breast of English men, but, looking at it, if we can, through the Orloff spectacles of the Minister for Foreign Af fairs, exclaim, " All this is dope to conciliate the feelings of the Polish people!" In the ad dress of the Polish refugees in France, presented to the House of Com►nons by Lord Ebrington the other night, and which a point of form caused to he postponed—in that address, signed by 1622 Senators, Deputies, Generals, and other public functionaries of Poland, we observe the follmsing passage:—" When commencing a strug gle, which lasted during ten months, the Poles were persuaded that policy and humanity would induce the Powers of Europe to interfere in their behalf. Nevertheless, those Powers remained silent. The the three neighbouring Monarchs, acting in concert, succeeded, either by open war, or secret and hostile manceuvres and in trigues, in paralysing and defeating our efforts, and nobody has since thought of paying the debt contracted towards Poland. In vain did the National Government endeavour to unravel, through its diplomatic agents, the mysteries of the Cabinets—a profound silence or deceitful promises stifled the sympathies of the people— the time went by, and we were overpowered." Are we then to be told there is no redress, no hope, for Poland, unless Prussia and Austria— the open participators in the first outrageous robbery of the rights of that country—the more than secret abettors in the latest ravages of her desolator—combine with our Government to ask restitution of him who has only taken the largest share of the unhallowed spoils? It would be more honest to spurn the suppliant Poles from the doors of Parliament, and tell them that England, though bound by treaty, can neither redress their wrongs nor her own insults. But will the people of England allow of five millions of their money being voted to Russia ? Will they send back to Parliament, under the Reform Bill, any representatives who will concur in re warding barbarian outrage and insolence with British gold ?—Morning Herald. It is by no means extraordinary that Ministers should shrink from the discussion of the ques tions involved in the present deplorable state of Ireland ; that they should use every exertion to prevent investigation into those evils which are but too plainly the result of their own mischiev ous and disgraceful policy. Concession after concession has been made, with the effect only of still increasing the demands of the Catholic faction, while the Protestant or English interest has been proportionably injured and depressed. The great measure of Emancipation, as it was called, was forced upon the fears of the late Ministry by the incessant clamours of the party now in power. This, they assured us, was to effect permanent conciliatiun and peace through out Ireland ; yet what a commentary on their former professions does their present conduct supply! The first acts of the L►berals on as suming the Government are to abandon the property of the Established Church to its enemies, and, as far as in them lies, to exclude the Protestant religion from the public schools of Ireland. With every concession the condi tion of that unhappy country has sunk from bad to worse, till at length the Catholic Priesthood, emboldened by success, have organized a general conspiracy, or rather rebellion, which bids fair to sever the connexion between the two countries. A fearful end must shortly come. There is no disguising the fact that the object of the conspi rators is the separation of the two countries, the utter extinction of the Established Church, and the extermination of the Protestants. These ob jects are already avowed, not in words merely, but in acts that are unequivocal, and ere long there will he a bloody struggle effectually to ac complish thein.—Morning Post. The Romans greatly valued the cuckoo as an article of fool; ana the Fri , ncli and Italians eat it at this dy. When fattened, it is said to be as delicate as the andrail. A SHOWER OF SMALL FISH.—On the 13 hof June, amid an tiou.o illy heavy shower of rain, tiler.- fell, in the parish of New Kilpatrick, a quantity of small fish, can.isting chiefly of herring-fry; the 1 argent of them 2 c inche, in length, others the size of large min nows, about 200 altogether, on a space of a few yard' square. The place where they fell is ahout three miles from the Clyde, ;it R.n.ra-ferty (the nearest point), where erring-fry are found in abundance. They must have been caught up from the river by a whirlwind, an d car ried through the air to the place where the fell.— Gills you, Herald. FROM LAST NIGTIT'S GAZETTE. - - LORD CHAMBERLAIN'S OFFICE, Jt'rx 2, 1832. Notice is hereby given, that his Majesty's Levee next week will be held on Monday the 9th, instead of Wednesday the Ilth instant, at two o'clock. The cards of the Gentlemen to be pre sented at the Levee on the 9th instant, should be at this Office by twelve o'clock on the Friday preceding. WINDSOR CASTLE, JUNE 24. The King was this day pleased to confer the honour of Knight hood upon Colonel John Woodford, of the Grenadier Regiment of Foot Guards, and to nominate him a Knight Commander of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic Order. CROWN_OFFICE, JULY 3. MEMBERS RETURNED TO SERVE IN THIS PRESENT PARLIAMENT. %BOROUGH OF CHIPPING WYCOMBE—The Hon. Charles Grey, of Sheen, in the county of Surrey, in the room of Sir Thomas Baring Bart., who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. BOROUGH of KNARESBOROUGH—The Hon. NI illiam Ponsonby, of St. James's-square, in the county of Middlesex, in the room of the Right Hon. Sir James Maci' tosh, deceased. CROWN OFFICE, Juts 3. DAYS AND PLACES APPOINTED FOR HOLDING THE SUMMER ASSIZES, 1832, viz. HOME CIRCUIT. Before the Right Hon. CHARLES Lord TEN , F:RDEN, Lord Chi* Justice, and Mr. Baron BAYLEY. HERTFORDSHIRE—A t Hertford, Wednesday, July 18. E , SEX —At Chelmsford, Monday, July 23. KENT—At Maidstone, Monday, July 30. SUSSEX—At Lewes, Saturday, August 4. SURREY—At Guildford, Thursday, August 9. MIDLAND CIRCUIT. Before Justice Su* JAMns ALLAN PARR and Baron VAUGHAN. NORTHAMPTONSHIRE— At Northampton, Monday, July 16. RirrLallostititE —At Okeham, Friday, July 20. LINCOLNSHIRE—At the Castle of Lincoln, Saturday, July 21. CITY OF LINCOLN—At the City of Lincoln, same day. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE—At Nottingham, Friday, July 27. TOWN or N:OTTINGHAM—At the Town of Nottingham, same day. DERBYSHIRE—.At Derby, Wednesday, August 1. T.EICF:STERSHIRE— At the Castle of Leicester, Saturday, Aug. 4. BOIOUGH OF LEICESTER—At the Borough of Leicester, same day. Zrry OF COVENTRY—Thursday, August 9, at the City of Coventry. WARWICKSHIRE—The same day, at Warwick. NORFOLK CIRCUIT. Before the Right Hon. Sir NICHOLAS CONYNGIIAM TINDAL, Lord Chief Justice, and Mr. Justice GASELEE. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE—At Buckingham, Monday, July 16. BEDFORDSHIRE—At Bedford, Thursday, July 19. HUNTINGDONSHIRE—At Huntingdon, Saturday, July 21. CAMBRIDGESHIRE—At Cambridge, Monday Jul) , 23. SUFFOLK —At Bury St. Edmund' s , Th urs d a y, July 26. NORFOLK—At the Castle of Norwich, Monday, July 30. CITY OF NORWICH—At the Guildhall of the City of Norwich, same day. NORTHERN CIRCUIT. Before Mr. Justice JAMES PARKE, and Mr. Baron BOLLAND. YORKSHIRE—At the Castle of York, Saturday, July 14. CITY OF YORK—At the Guildhall of the City of York, same day. DURHAM—At Durham, Saturday July 28. NORTHUMBERLAND, at Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Wednesday, August 1. TOWN OF NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE—At the Guildhall of New castle-upon- a yne, same day. CUMBERLAND—At Carlisle, Monday, August 6. WESTMORELAND—At Appleby, Friday, August le, LANCASHIRE.—At Lanca ter, Monday, August 13. WESTERN CIRCUIT. Before Mr. Justice "faumroN and Mr. Justice PArrEsom. SOUTHAMPTON—At the Castle of Winchester, Monday, July 16. WILTSHIRE—At New Sarum, Saturday, July 21. D RSETSHIRE--A , Dorchester, Thursday, July 26. DEVONSHIRE—At the Castle of Exeter, Tuesday, July 31. CITY AND COUNTY OF EXETER—At the Guildhall of the City of Exeter, the same day. CORNWALL—At Bodmin, Tuesday, August 7. SOMERTSETSHIRE—At Wells, Monday, August 13. CITY OF BRISTOL—At the Guildhall of the city of Bristol, Satur day, August 18. OXFORD CIRCUIT. Before Mr. Justice BOSANQUET and Baron GURNEY. BF.RKSIIIRE—At Abingdon, Monday, July 16. OXFORDSHIRE—At Oxford, Wednesday, July 18. W. RCESTERSHIRE—At Worcester, Saturday, July 91. CITY OF WORCESTER—At the City of Worcester, the same day, STAFFORDSHIRE—At Stafford, Thursday, July 26. SIIROPSHIRE—At Shrewsbury, Wednesday, August 1. HEREFORDSHIRE—At Hereford, Saturday, August 4. MONMOUTHSHIRE—At Monmouth, Wednesday, August 8. GLOUCESTERSHIRE—At Gloucester, Saturday, August 11. CITY OF GLOUCESTER—At the City of Gloucester, the same day. COUNTY PALATINE OF CHESTER AND PRINCIPA. LI IT OF WALES. _ _ Before the Right Hon. JOHN SINGLETON Lord LYNDRHUST, Lord Chief Baron, and Mr. Justice ALDERSON. GLAMORGANSIIIRE—At Cardiff; Saturday, July 7. CARMARTHENSHIRE—At Carmarthen, Saturday, July 14. BOROUGH OF CARMARTHEN—At the Borough of Carmarthen, the same day. ' MONTGOMERYSHIRE—At Welsh Pool, Saturday, July 14. PEMBROKESHIRE--At Haverfordwest, Saturday, July 14. TOWN OF HA% ERFORDWEST—The same day, at the Town of Ha. verfordwest. MERIONETHSHIRE—At Dolgelly, Wednesday, July 18. C7AARaNDiaGaAvNux:RnErt_cA t 25. A NLOESEY—At Beaumaris, the same day. DENBIGHSHIRE-At Ruth,n, Saturday, July 28. — A Cardigan, tCarnary °n Wednesday, Saturday July july ( BRECKNOCKSHIRE—At Brecon, the same day. FLINTSIIIRE—At Mold, Wednesday, August 1. RADNORSHIRE—At Presteign, the same day. Cuxsuras—At Chester, Saturday, August 4. WHITEHALL, JUNE 15. The Lord Chancellor has appointed Robert Bonny Fisher, of Preston, in the coun y palatine of Lancaster, Gent., to be a Mas ter Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery. WHITEHALL, JUNE 25. The Lord Chancellor has appointed Edward Procter, of Mac. clesfield, in the county of Chester, Gent, to b e a Master Extraor dinary in the High Court of Chancery. WHITEHALL, JUNE 26. The Lord Chancellor has apponited Gabriel Stone Poole, of Bridgewater, in the county or Somerset, Gent, to be a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery. WHITEHALL, JUNE 30. The Lord Chancellor has appointed William Lloyd Roberts, of Carnarvon, Gent. to be a Mager Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. THOMAS WILLIAM WILLIAMSoN, Lothbury, cloth. factor, enlarged for forty-two-days from July 10. BA NKRUPI'S. JOHN DALTON, Upper Thames street, victualler, July 16 and August 14, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Stanley, Bridge.street, Blackfriars. SAMUEL TEULON, Greenwich, upholsterer, July 11, at half-past eleven, and August 14, at twelve, at the Court of Bank ruptcy. Egan and Waterman, Essex.street, Strand. JAMES DOVE, Cadogan-place, Chelsea, coal-merchant, July 11, at eleven, and August 14, at twelve, at the Court of Bank ruptcy. Green, King's Arms-yard, Coleman-street; Saward and Waterman, Furnival's Inn. THOMAS SeARNELL, Brighton, tavern-keeper, July 13, at twelve, and August 14, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Lewis, Crutched-friars. HENRY PICKUP, Yeddingham, Yorkshire, inn-keeper, July 18, at the White Swan Inn, Goodramgate, and August 14, at eleven, at the Sun Inn, Talton. Hicks and Mauls, Gray's Inn square; Walker, New :Talton. THOMAS W AKEL AM, Willenhall, Staffordshire, curry. comb-maker, July 13 and August 14, at ten, at the New Royal Hotel, New-street, Birmingham. Hawkins and Richards, Bir mingham ; and Norton and Chaplin, Gray's Inn-square. JOSEPH LOCKER, Hanley, Staflbrdshire, grocer, July 9 and August 14, at two, at the Swan Inn, H ,nley White an,; Whit more, Lincoln's Inn Old-squ ire ; Leigh and Thornicroft, Hanky DIVIDENDS. J. and T. Brown, Bromley St. Leonard's, Middlesex, black_ ash manufacturers, July 25, at eleven, at the Court of Bank ruptcv—W. Farrar, Bread-street, Cheapside, warehouseman, July 24, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy—G. Smirthwaite, Bush-lane, Cannon-street, merchant, July 27, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy—J. Bull, 'Mitcham, brewer, Jul} , 26, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy—R. Starke, Borough-market, builder, July 25, at two, at the Court of Bankruptcy—lt. Sher wood, Princes-street, Stamford-street, Black friars-road, builder, July 25, at two, at the Court of Bankruptcy—W. Prentice, High street, Southwark, ironmonger, July 25, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy—B. Kent, Bungay, Sutlblk, innkeeper, July 25, at six, at the Bell Inn, Orford-hill, Norwich—J. M'Gregor, Liverpool, merchant, July 27, at one, at the Clarendon-rooms, Liverpool—W. Moore and J. M'Creight, Liverpool, corn-mer chants, July 21, at twelve, at the office of Mr Bardswell, Liver pool—W. Dymond, Launceston, Cornwall, bookseller, July 26, at twelve, at he White Hart Inn, Launceston—S. F. Lott, Exe ter, hatter, July 24, at twelve, at the Old London Inn, Exeter— W Leach, Thetford, butcher, July 23, at one, at the White Swan, Norwich—A. Wright and Woodhead, Woodroyd, Yorkshire, dyers, July 30, at twelve at the Pack Horse Inn, Hud dersfield—F. Downing, jun., Huddersfield, wine -merchant, Aug. 1, at ten, at the White Horse Inn, Huddersfield—R. Wright, jun., Stockport, Cheshire, grocer, July 28, at ten, at the York Hotel, Manchester—J. B. Taylor, sen. and J. B. Tay lor, jun.. Stockport, Cheshire, iron.founders, July 2S, at eleven, at the York Hotel, Manchester—G. Deane, Newton, Lancashire, innkeeper, July 25, at ten, at the Stat Inn, Manchester—J. R. Lyon, Cambridge, grocer, July 26, at one, at the Bull, Cambridge —E. Welldon, Cambridge, butcher, July 24, at eight, at the Black Bull Inn, Cambridge—G. Bradley, Stockport, Cheshire, inn keeper, July 23, at three, at the Albion Hotel, Manchester—W. Crowe, Bury St. Edmunds, Suftblk, cutler, July 26, at one, at the Bell, Bury St. Edmunds. CERTIFICATES—JeLy 24. Thomas Allinson, Manchester, commission-agent—John New man, Duke of Wellington public-house, South-street. Chelsea, ictualler—Pedro D'Llano and Pedro Itull, Liverpool, merchan 3 —John Jaques and Wm. Wright, High-street, Newington-butts, booksellers and printers—Wm. Henson, Worcester, lace manu facturer—John Bcebby tirockbank, Manchester, slate dealer— John Doughty Hepworth, Leeds, surgeon—John Jones, New road, Whitechapel-road, stationer—Thos. Williams, Inchbrook Mills, Gloucestershire, clothier—George Roddis, Haymarket, wine merchant—Daniel Burgess, Old Cavendish-street, jeweller—Thomas Benbow, Tenbury, Worcestershire, mercer— Wm. Quinton, Walsall, Staffbrashire, victualler—John Charles James, Bathford, Somersetshire, stone merchant—Wm. Merry. weather, Long acre, coachmaker. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. S. Kenrick and J E. Bowman, Wrexham, bankers—G. Jack son and Geo. Jackson, jun Northallerton, linen-drapers—Wm. Merry and Thomas Brown, Wood-street, Cheapside, ribbon ma nufacturers—Wm. Grant, Geo. Grant, Geo. Grant, jun. and Win. M'Lorg, Portsmouth, bankers, (so far as reg a rd s William merchants—John Rowe and Ocennor, Brighton, brew mer chants—lt NPLorg)—.l. E. Nash and T. W Hill, Bristol, oil and colour Keys and Samuel Hadden, Birmingham, wine and spirit . e S r . c hilaandtds_ Hadden, a liid E J e . a .l-1 ,, coal-merchants—Win. Hodges and Thos. Grover,.l'. a' W• Barford, of c w h i a n n e t a s— nd lt spi K ri e t y ni s, Chelsea, linen-drapery Northumberland, seeds ( rozer and Henry Watson, Alnwick, hurstreet, whole- Birmingham, patent i—jindarngeesneSriaml Sinister r y men—Fred. Barnes and T. K. Baker,...l;e a n in c i John Moore, and sale ironmongers —Samuel Sadler, l V - ` .. tre housernen and agents— .an\c‘l-aGiedouregke C B o t i r o r r mi k, e g H . h r a o uTi Edw. Jones Smith, Watling_stree.tcsm-akers_R M. Owen, L. .T. and J. Feather, Shettietd, 7rlTament-street, Liverpool, brass_ Addison, and J. Grindrod, r t xxr s. ' Kerney, Brompton-row,liensing d enait Moore,d J. , C ,i a b r u v r e r ,, , a A t l a h . founders—J. Kerbey,an' • w ri „_°. and T. Ashby, Derby, dra. tot), surgeons and apotmc Johnson, and W. M. Whitley, Liver. srs- 1, - pers and haberdashers —E. solictors _ H. Ambler, J. Ambler, and J and d nufacturers — John pool, attorneys and ll Mill, Halifax, worsted-spinners—E. Lit. Bairstow, Bayley-halt Lbuiviiedreprost,jm. eirteelitfaenatsiiTiJ.asodaJi.kHinit,r,tliatntitt.,. tie and T. J. Hutton, — lps iL an il d ia L s . Castl e- g reen 'Ti er-Thames-street, coal-merchants—'l'. and H. land-wharf, ... , 1 , Chester, tor. solicitors—L. Hanson and J. Bower, Botol 3 b neys and P -lane, C. Greatrex, and NV or ange-merchants— . . , W. Durham, W.dsall Staftbrdshire, saddlers'-ironmongers—J. I irdseye and J. Biggers, Waterloo-road, boot and shoe salesman—T. Robins, W. P 6 T. Foster, E. Coode, T. Bolitho, W. Bolitho, and NV. We ister, bankers (so ttr as regards W. Westlake)-1t Dawsonst ake, and J. C. Baker, Didmarton, Gloucestershire, drapers—H, Wigan anti J. W,..rd, Wigan, Lancashire, mordaunt- manufacturers }; Ripley, Li.rilveerr.phoaont,tsm_eirtc.hapnhtes Lynch and J. Tetlow, Manchester, painters—S. Miller and J. Marshall, Marxet-square, Northampton, wine and brandy-mer chants—J. R. Barran and J. Taylor, B road -street, Bloomsbury. snuff:manufacturers. MARKET INTELLIGENCE. LONDON MARKETS. (From the London New Price Current of yesterday.) Stiaa R.-The demand tor West India Muscovades, which vas brisk and extensive early in last week, rather gave way towards the close, yet the prices were not only fully mpported, but in some instances were 6d. to Is. per , :wt. higher. The males last week amount to nearly 400 Mids. and trs. The Sugar Market to-day is steady, but the request is not so general and extensive as last week ; the estimated sales, not including the Barbados, are only 700 hhds. and trs. ; the prices are unvaried. The supply of Barbados this day, 113 hhds. 13 tra., were not sold, on account of the holders attempting to sell in bond, which the trade resisted, and wool I not purchase. The stock of West India Sugar is now 24,722 hhds. and trs., which ;s 17,877 less than last year. The stock of Mauritius is 79,101 bags, being 44 329 less than last year. The de 'ivery of West India Sugar is 3.748 hhds. and trs., being 343 more than last year. The delivery of Mauritius 10,619 bags, 4,435 more than the corresponding week of 1831. Notwithstanding the advance of the Raw Market, Refined has been heavy and declining; brown Lumps 645. 6d. and 655. This afternoon the Market is very heavy, and offers are made for goods at still lower rates, hut the purchases are not to any extent, though the buyers could purchase on more advantageous terms. EAST INDIA SUGARS. - At the India House and public sales last week. 11,500 Lacs Bengal :-The ordinary white sold, sound, 245. 6d. ; damp, 24a. ; gooi white, 255. 6d. a 28s. ; damp. 245. 6d. a 27a. ; fine white, 28s. 6d. a 30s. ,damp 275. 6d. a 284. ; fine yellow, 235. 6d. ; damp, 224. a 225. 6d. ; Siam, 934 bags, white ordinary to good, 235. 6d. a 255. 6d. ; Manilla, 5,300 mats yellow, good to fine, 255. a 275., damp, 235. 6d. a 255. MAURITIUS SUGARS.-AbOUt 10,000 bags Mauritius Sugars sold last week 6d. a is. per cwt higher; but the market was not so brisk at the close of the week. This day's public sale, 3,629 bags Mauritius ; the whole sold nearly at former prices, the fine at rather lower rates. FOREIGN SUGAR.-By public sale last week, 430 chests &imaged white Havannah sold at high prices, 275. a 325. 64. ; 51 packs of Para Muscovades, brown and yellow, 235. a 245.-Average price of Sugar, 11.8 s. 41(1. per cwt. COFFEE.-The only material alteration in Coffee last week was an advance of Is. a is. 6d. on all ord. descrip tions of East India and Foreign Coffee, of which about 5 000 bags changed hands ; Brazil 595. a 635., St. Do mingo 60s. a 615., Batavia 58s. a 605., Ceylon 575. a 58s. 6d. Sumatra 565. ; mid. to good mid. Jamaica 86s. a 895., fine 965.-There were no public sales of Coffee this day, and no purchases by private contract were re ported. The Market has still a firm appearance. Rum, BRANDY, AND HOLLANDS.-The Rum Market continues firm in price, and the sales extensive; proof Leeward, Is. 7d. ; but the principal purchases are of strong Jamaica Rums for home consumption, at very full Market prices. Brandy was heavy, and rather lower, but there is to-day more appearance of a firm Market. Ge neva very dull. HEMP, FLAX, AND TALLOW.-In Tallow there is little variation ; the M irket continues dull. In Hemp or Flax there is no material alteration. INDIGO —The East India sale will consist of 7,200 chests, of which above 1,200 will not be inspected till after Friday ; the inspection must, of course, be very h❑rried and defective. Woor..—Th e M ar k e t is dull ; the large sales advertised attract much attention. Tr two floating csrgoes of Tobacco have not yet found purchasers ; the only transactions reported are for the 'own trade, which continues brisk. SALTPETRE.-Saltprtre is very firm; good quality 284 6 I. and 294. Hors.—The duty has risen to 175.0001. and the ge neral reports of the plant are very favourable; there are some accounts of an opposite nature, but they appear local. The prices of Hops in the market are declining. RICE.—In Rice there is no alteration. COTTON.—The G.tton Market continues very steady. The purchafs are 590 Bowed, mid. sid., good fair 6kd., 60 Madras, go.id fair 4i-1. ; 300 Surats, ord. 41d., good fair 41d., 50 Bengal, good fair 4id. TEA.—A few Bobeas have been sold at sold at sale's prices, 2s. 0 d. ; generally there is but little doing in the market. ASFIES.—Little doing, prices steady. SILK.—The mai ket continues flat; there is very little doing, but good silks are fetching rather better prices ; the alteration is trifling. TuarswrlNK.--500 barrels of the late arrivals sold at 11s. ; the market heavy. OILS. —ln Oils prices are firm ; large forward pur chases of Linseed and Ripe Oils have been made during the past week. SPlcEs.—ln Spices there is little alteration. COUNTRY Ci•RN .o VUUING 11KE WEEK. Wheat. Barley. I Oats. I Beans. Per Quarter. Boston _ Gainsborough Grantham Grimsby Horncastle Lincoln Spilsby Stamford S. to S. s. to s. s. to s. 18 34 20 36 18 25 36 38 17 24 20 40 16 20 30 34 18 24 3.5 37 18 22 34 36 21 23 32 24 16 25 31 41 57 64 5t 65 55 58 58 62 58 65 55 63 56 ';8 S. to s. 25 37 37 44 1.8 32 30 35 39 40 30 34 30 39 34 43 NOR W wit, June 30. Wheat (per qr.) 60s 665. 68s. I Beans (per qr.) 355. 38g. Barley 28s. 325. 345. Pease, Grey 365. 40s. o.tts 225. 26... 28s. Flour, fine (per sack) 48s. 50s. CANTER BONI, June 30. Wheat, white......... 589. to 675. —B. to --S. 50s. to Ms Old —s. to —s. Barley, Malting —,. 325. to 345. Grinding.. 245. to 309. Oats Beans 33s Pease to 395. to —s. 01d—......... 38s. to 40s. Grey...—. 335. to 375. MANCHESTER, June 30. Wheat, per 70Ib. 9s. 9d. to 10s. 4d. Red 9s. 6.1. to 9s. 9d. Barley, per 601 b 5 6 6 0 Oats...— 3 6 3 9 Beans, per Imperial quarter Pease, White, per Imperial bushel 5 0 5 6 Malt, per 6 Imperial bushels 43 0 49 0 Flour, per Sack ...f 280Ib 49 0 53 0 EXETER ARKETS --June 29. Beef ud. 9,. 6d. Wheat (busiiel ) .Ss. Od. Bs. 6d. Mutton (lb 5i 0 6 Barley 6 4 9 Veal and t amb......0 6 0 7 Oats 9 3 2 5 Pork —0 4 0 6 Beans 6 6 U Geese (each) ..—.......4 0 5 6 Batter 0 1 3 Ducks 0 5 0 Eggs (12) 0 0 1 0 Fowls 0 4 0 Potatoes (peck) ...0 6 0 7 IRISH MA DUBLIN MARKET NO' R KETS. 299 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone 0 Bete l6 stone o Barley l6 stone 1,195 Oats l2 stone 10,043 Cwt. Flour 9 stone 711 Oatmeal 8 stone Sold to Makers only. 8,334 Cwt. Flour Average price of Wheat am Receipts of Flour, '7,730 Sts, Sales of Do. 10,043 Se " nd Thirds, PRICE OF I Quartern Loaf Blid. I 1 'I . E.—FRIDAY, June 29. From 'l'o Average. 30 0 36 6 34 '2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 6 .2 12 0 10 2 8 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 13 5 11 2 17 I 29. 0I 19 !Flour o 48, 4d. per sack. 3S from 9.05. Od. to 225. Od. from 17s. Od. to 20s. Od. from 9s. Od. to 124 Od. MEAD. lalf Qua Wheat, Barley. Oats. Hour. per cwt. per barrel per barrel per barrel f .,--- - -A—_____, 20 stone. 16 stone. 14 stone. Ist. 2d. 7 7 2. 8 6 :1 , 7 6 8 2 0 0 6 62 6 0 '56 0 s. d. as. d. s. 6. as.(l. s ----- . 0. a 5.d.. ---- s. d. c a :; s . ..il. d. s -----"""" .: d .a ..i s s. . d d .. . Cork -- 30 0 326 126 14 silo 0 108 17 0 19 6 0 16 0 Limerick !27 6 30 013 0 14 0,112 0 13 6 16 0 ID 0 0 0 15 0 Waterfordi2B 0 31 013 0 16 011.10 11 0 17 0 19 ( 10 0 lc! 43 1 c ca to r li w ne ...... l ...1 3 2( 0 i 0 4 3 3 2 0 0 1 1 6 2 0 9 1 1 7 6 0 0 11 1 0 3 0 6 1 1 0 3 6 9 2 017 6 9 t L: ii : _ 9 ttii ____ : l` l 1 ' - % 2 6 Beef, Mutton, Pork, --- ~717: . : era lb ds, ~.11 L. ..._. er a l; ~,,;.,.‘p , e r iiii.r a cwt. as;;2d. 06 8; 1 .84 s d t 0 . 0. 0 56 0 Limerick— 3 43 i 4at 70 0 66 0 60 0 70.......... Carlow— 4 5i 0 - ,50700 CO 0 0 L W :lo a n te in r e f l r — d 4 3 16, n 65 3 0 0 2 7 0 ,0) g s B O o t ( : 87 7 6 6 0 ( 0 ) 2 7 0 4 0 ... . . . 0 ... . . ioi . . . . . 0 :34tostn.lp7e;(2.boallgaelr,s70,77----a„8,.. 10s. per bar- Wh . eat 265. to 28s. ; Beef 4d. to sd. per lb. Mutton rel; Barley 13s. to ; 4d. Potatoes 2d. per s. 2d. per cw • Bacon t '' per barr E e N l N ; v rlou ß r u 2 l7 7 w t — t t t P 0 i 1 : 5 ;3 : 2 ; s. to 335. c We reg ret to announce the death of Lord AmEsßuß y, which took place on Saturday morning, after a short illness. We beli eve hi s Lordship was upwards of 84 years of age. lie repr esented the county of Berke for nearly half a century, and was highly respected for his upright and co nstitutional principles. The title becomesextinct, as th ere i s no male heir. On the I s t inst. at Twvforct-n BIRTHS. o c. ShiPl e usc, Hants, the wife of the R e v. Y of a son. On the I , st i list, at Llysnewydd-house, near Ne wcas tl e -Emiyn, Carma rthenshire the lady of John Harry Hammond Spencer. Esq., of %Vest-Cro sq , near Swansea, of a son an d h e ir. ( 0 ) the l,e 2 3d d i i n n s s t i. a i t n Ca l m ,o br York - r s ix t - r e e l l e t V: On the 30th ult.' at the Vicarage, Eatington, Warwickshire, Mrs. H enry Buckley, of a daughter. J. 0. Han son, E sq., of a daughter. icPaorratgine'ani‘!srqs.uaSrtoe,rietheoflaadsyono'f MARRIED. r‘ James Frederic e ß d a e i On the 3d inst. at St. - ' Mary 's Church, Bryanst on-square„ George Darner, third son of the Right Hon. Sir Henry Pa rne ll , Bart. M.P., to Catherine, daughter of Sir John St. Aul ln, B art. of O St n n t it h l e ififld d , Harms, of Farringdon-street. DIED. t u o l z t a, St e . i d A e i s l t dr d e a w u ' g s, h te H r o o l b f o r ,. GMero. On the Ist inst. at Twickenham, Louisa, the wife of the Rev. James Wilkie. On the 28th ult. in London, Charles F. J. Durell, Esq., of Bel. mont.house, Chelt. nhani, in the 70th year of his age. On the 30th ult. in Holborn.hill, Mr. Henry Gilbert, aged 76. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY MURDO YOUNG, AT THE SUN OFFICE. 112, STRAND, LONDON.