The Sun. — London, England, 1801-12-01 00:00:00

REPORT. c?titT 7P KING's BENCH, Nov. 30. SITTINGS 87.1'01t4 LORD KXNVON IN WISTMINSTSR- ItA.LL. DAVISON V. GILDART. , Tor Plaintiff is a Milliner in Pall-Mall ; the Defendant a Clergyman residing in Yorkshire, but who, with his wife, conies- occasionally to town. This was an anion brought for the amount of a bill for a cloak and other articles of wearing apparel furnished for Mrs. Gildart the Defendant's wife, they . were at lodgings in Millman-street, Bediord.row, in the Spring, April or May 1799 ; and it appeared clearly that these articles were fur nished to the Defendant's wife while they were in lodgings at this place, .and living together ; and it was said that the charges were reasonable charges, of what -was called a ready money price.—This •was the- case on the part of the Plaintiff. Mr. ERSKINE contended, on the part of the De fendant,• that he was not liable to pay thiS demand, and, he said, it was material to every tradesman in this country, particularly in this town, to know, that if ,a man's wife, living with him, goes to the shop of any tradesman, - and contraas debts in the absence of her husband, that husband is answerable for such debts only to such an amount as may. be suitable to his degree in life, and it was well that the law was so, otherwise a man might be ruined before he could have time to look about him. This _Defendant was - a Clergyman, living in Yorkshire, and,, occasionally, came to London with his wife. That wife, although he had not the slightest reason . to suspeet her virtue, had the failing to be most extravagantly fond of dress, for Which the dissi pation of this metropolis afforded her too many op portunities of indulging, and which she did to such .an extent, that it became the subjeet of disagree ment between her and her husband,• and caused their separation for a While. In consequence of this un happy infirmity of the Defendant's wife, the De., lendant finding himself surrounded daily by credi tors on her account, gave notice to those who used to give her credit, not to deal with her'y titan but to ready money, and this was the Defendant's case in this atllon. After this the •?laintiff had thought fit to trust her, for which the Defendant was not liable in point of law any more ti - .an in point of conscience. The Defendant had only this com plaint to make against his wife ; she had. no other infirmity: she was the mother of seven children, and entirely virtuous ; but the law did not call on the - Defendant to answer for all her improvident con tratas when they went beyond his degree, and that the more especially after the Defendant had given the Plaintiff notice not to give out any articles to his wife-otherwise than for ready money ; notwith standing this the Plaintiff chOse to trust this Lady, who - had this absurd propensity to extravagance in dress, to the amount of 171. and upwards. There was another circumstance of which the Defendant had reason' to complain loudly, and that was, the art that had been used by Mrs. Dawson to entice this dress-smitten Lady, the Defendant's wife, to purchase different articles of futery and frippery. There needed no eloquence to assist this Lady in her fondness for dress ; and yet, after this caution un d Fitt tar the not •rk•cfr hio Miss Dawson, by her mother's dircEtion, had written to Mrs. Gildart a letter on the I 8 th of April t Soo, as follows • " Mrs. Dawson is extremely sorry to trouble Mrs. Gildart about the little account of last year, but as Mrs: Gildart particularly ,desired it to be charged as read}' money price, as she said Mr. Gildart. would be 'extremely angry ifshe left Town without paying tot Dawson, did not get any 'thing by it, as Mrs. Gildart left Town : She has been a loser— She.v.ill be . very much obliged' by a remittance.— Mfs. - Dawson, on the first week in May, introduces a Spring Hat, of which nothing before was ever tna - nufattured of the kind, it, is so strikingly elegant and jiinple, and so much in Mrs. Gildart's stile, that Mrs. Dawson much hOpes to receive an order." This was the sort of ,flummery by . which, This Plaintiff. recommended her frippery, and it succeeded too well with this unfortunate Devotee to Finery, the Defendant's wife, for a bonnet was never ten minutes iti het eye, before it was upon her head, if promising to pay for it could give it a place there; a§, - to the Defendant's sorrow, it had been the case frequently, and would appear to-day, if the Plain:. tiff chose to aft with candour, by producing the 'Books, by which it would appear that the last rol. that was paid by this Defendant to 'the Plaintiff, was on account of,a balance ofa bill for pl. for, ar ticle of dress, furnished by the Plaintiff to the be leildant's wife. NOtice had been : given - to the Plaintiff to produce his books. 14 one word, the Defendant Would be undone if all the'ex - travagant cOntrins of this-wife of his, Were to beheld bind ing n'pon him. 'SO true it was, that a woman who ZYas not only virttidus, but free from every foible btrt'one; Might be the ruin of her husband by that fbible, bat he was confident the case would not be so in the present instance. Mr. Sinclair, an Attorney, being• examined, ` ` swore as fellows :—" I saw Mr. Benjamin, Dawson (the Plaintiff), about eight or ten days ago, on the - subjet of this Adion. I asked him, . whether., he had been paid any Money on account of thii Lady. I cAled with Mr..Gildart on him, in Pall-mall.—l c-:Hied,on 'him for the purpose of knowing, whether Mrs: ',Dawson would acknowledge a Letter which ;he received frOiii him. • I produced that Letter 'to him: I did it to save the trouble of subpoenaing WitneseS' to Prove the hand-writing.. He looleed at the Letter, and Said, he would not deny-the Letter, but acknowledged -thAt it . was his Letter. 'Mr. Gil_ ,dart expressed his - stirprise that after the intimation and notice lie had given, that he could let his wife :tin up any bill there. . The words were----." After the notice i have giVen you, I am very much sur prised that you shouldiet . my wife real Up a bill.—l havc given you tiOlice; frequently, shat,you should rot gi ve • I,r any article without ready thOney, and that. she Should not lave bill' with you at all." Mr. baWson Said, "It is true, ybit.liaite given me notice tolhat elre6l, but as `,;Nits. Gil4art had been,. ' for several years, a respeetable customer. of .my: wife's, I wished her name to be on my books, though I should have preferred ready money."—' That is all.-that passed. On cross-examination, the Witness said, " that the. wayhe came to call on-Mr. Dawson, was, to learn . whether he would acknowledge his hand-writing, to save the trouble and expense of subpcznaing Wit nesses to prove ita—l do. not think that the De fendant is a distressed man. He is a very respect able man: I dare .say his Living is worth 7001. a year ; . but what his private fortune is, I cannot tell." Lord KErryoff.—" The question here is, whe ther a persOn giving credit to a wife, contrary to the diredion of the husband, recover that credit in a Court of Justice To that question only one answer can be given; most undoubtely he cannot." Mr. MTNGAY, on the part of the Plaintiff did nor deny the proposition laid down by my Lord, as a general proposition, but submitted it to the Jury as frquestion to be decided by them, whether the Defendant had not waived his right to insist on that proposition in this Case, inasmuch as this cloak and the other articles were furnished to the wife while the husband was with her. That he saw her wear the articles, and that he ought to have refused to allow them to be taken in ; that if he was averse to his n jfe's wearing these fine things, he ou to have ttrrnetl-out the person who brought the. 'le, band-box arid. baggage.. _But that if., Jl . - bse to bring his wile with hiirCter:o4ll;ay metropolis, instead of keeping her (as perhaps she ought to be kept) with her family in Yorkshire, and chose to let her wear this sort of finery, and take it in at his own lodgings, he ought to pay the tradesman who furnishes; it, as it appeared to be sold for a ready-money price. This he submitted to the Jury to be disposed of as it should impress their minds. He thought they would consider whether the Defendant ought not. in this Case, either to pay for or send back the goods. Lord KENYON.—" Gentlemen of the Jury—lf the Plaintiff has a right to substantiate this Case, and to inforce the payment of this demand, in a Court of Justice, it seems to me that there is an end of all domestic felicity whatever among us, and an end also to that protedion which honest prudence has hitherto cast around_a man who would otherwise be undone by the improvidence of another. A man is liable to maintain his wife up to the ex- - tein of his degree in life ; this he is liable to, not only by the Law of the Land, but also by every social, moral, and religious duty. They all call on him to do so ; and if he treats his wife with any cruelty, turns her out of doors, and refuses to allow her necessaries, he compels her to contraEt debts in her own support ; and for such debts, up to the extent of his ability he is liable to pay ; but I never heard it, nor could an hundred verdids p if it were possible for them 'to beativen, influence the Law upon this subject, that ir a man's wife boos to a person and tuns in debt, and then the husband afterwards desires that person to be cautious in . future and not to trust her, but, to deal only .for ready-money with her, that such a husband. shall pay the debts which his wife enters into with that person, when the husband says expressly will not pay her bills,' he cannot be called upon at all, except where he turns her out of doors, and . she contrifts debts for her necessary support in life. I know the Learned Gentleman , _vho addressed you *on behalf of the Plaintiff in this Case, to be - an honourable man ; I am almost sorry that he should address you at all on such a subject as this ; it is a Case that is too clear, it is a Case where the pre cedent . would be pernicious if a Verdi& were given for the Plaintiff.—Most clearly the Plaintiff has made out no demand, and most elearly. the Defend.. ant is entitled to your Vcrdil." Verdid for the Defendant. GEORGE V. THE SHERIFF OF MIDDLESEX. This was an A - Etion brought for' Penalties under the Statute for Extortion, of a 'Bailiff who had ar rested the Plaintiff in. this Attion , at the suit of another for - i al. 16s. It -was nominally brought against the Sheriff, but in:reality agaihst the. She riff's Officer who gave the Sheriff security for : his condua, as is always the case, . . It appeared that after the Plaintiff was arrested on a Saturday, he was conduaed, by:his own desire, according to the provision of an Aft of Parliament, to the House of an Officer of the name of, Evans, in Covent-Garden,- and that he was there for the whole of Sunday ; that he paid the debt without any 'further 'proceedings, and yet Mr. ERSKINE stated, they contrived to charge him, one way or other; no less a sum than 71. 6s. Bd. a , 'sum that was shocking to think • of upon a debt of 1 21. 'and nothing bat the ProceSs and Arrest upon it that could be legally demanded. This Atlion was therefore, for the extortion which,' he said, wad evident from this sum of money being paid on this occasion.. It appeared that Evans was not the person to whom this Writ was dire led ; that the Plaintiff was brought only to his house as a Lock up-house;' and thcreforeit was contended by Mr. GAttaow, that Evans was not here employed by. the Sheriff in this particular aft, and that whatever belonged to it; the Sheriff was: not responsible. Lord .3i.stwirom said, he - was - sorry. there was such a• place 'as a Lock-up-house, and he felt no disposition to screen any of those who had the care of:such houses, whenever they did that which was prohibited' by the Law-; upon' which subje& there were many wholesome•Stathtes. Be approved also of the doffrine by which the superior was answer able for the misdeeds of his inferior in all cases of this kind ; the Sheriff was therefore responsible for the condo& of his Bailiff, and it was well .the Law was ,so, otherwise theTublic would have but indifferent security , for indemnification against op. pressive alts. . But then the Sheriff was only an_ swerable for the alts of his agents while they were aaing -as such, the Sheriff would have been .responsible to this Plaintiff, ..if the man who arrested him had ailed in any way irftproperly, because, in arresting the Plaintiff, he a6led as the Agent of the Sheriff; but the man who took him into the Lock up-house, was not, in that respea, aeting as the . - - LQNDON : Printed by BUCHANAN Wl'vl ILLAN, (of Bow-Street, C9vent-Garden); At the SUN-OFFItt, No. rz, Strand ; where ildvertitements, Orders Agentor. the Sketif. If there;" wis any. Complaint in that respe&, it must be made against. the.Bail.T himself, who took the money, for in . so doing he was acing for himself; and not against the Sheriff, for, in that particular, 'he was not acting- in the busines of the Sheriff. - Plaintiff nonsuited. COURT or COMMON PLEAS. Nov. 3e. SITTINGS AFTER TERM. WALKER against TlitiMAS. The Plaintiff is an Autlioneer, and has an Auc tion Room in Dean -street, Soho, the business of which is apparently carried on under the name of Christie, who sells for the Plaintiff. • A Gentleman of the name of Simpson, having bought goods at, the Plaintiff's Auftion Room, to the amount of io6l. 14.5. paid down a deposit of zol. and gave a Draft for the remainder on the De fendant, whp is the Master of George's Coffee- House, which was regularly paid. It was alledged, on the part of the Plaintiff; that in the payment of this Draft, a Bank Note for 301. had been given by the Defendant, which proved to be forged, and that; therefore, the Defendant not tracing it to any other person, was liable for the amount of the Note. The Note was traced and respeCtively sworn to from the hands of Christopher Christie, who re ceived it from the Defendant, and paid it at the in stance of Mrs. Walker, in the absence of her husband, the Plaintiff, to a Publican in the neigh bourhood, of the name of Clarke, by whom it was paid to Mr. Arbouiny a Brandy-Merchant, in Min cing -lane, who sent it to Messrs. Lees and Co. Bankers, by whom it was paid to the Bank., where it was discovered .to he a forgery. - Mr. Bliss, one the Inspeftors of the,Bank, proved the Note to be forged, and that it was one amongst many which came from llamhurgh, but said it was scarcely po3sible for any One except the inspeetors of the Bank to be aware of the difference. He also said that the Bank had formerly kept- all Notes which were found to be" fOrged, but that within six months past, - they had stamped them as forged and sent them back. _ ChriStopher Christie,. the son of the person . who sues for the Plaintiff; and who acts - as •the porter of . the lamer, swore to receiving the Note on the sth of May last from the Defendant, and laying' it .on the same day to Mr. Clarke. The latter made a memorandum at the time he received it, of the number and the sum, and also the person from wham he received it, and the day when, which was the sth of May. He was in doubt, however, whether he had set down the day correctly, and was inclined to think it was either the 6th or 7th of May that he had received. it. .• The Defence set up was, that the Draft of Mr. Simpson upon the Defendant, was not paid till the 6th of May, and that therefore, the 'Note in que stion, which was sworn .by Christopher Christie, to have been received on the sth May, could not have been received at the Defendant's house. It was sworn by Mr. Simpson, that he was accidental.: ly present at the Defendant's house, when his own DrArt• was present&l for' payment, and that it %vac on the ,6th May • - Lord ALVANLET having summed up the evi dence, observed, it was clear there had not been two payments at .the_ Defendant's, house upon.the Draft of Mr. Simpson.; ,the only difficulty that had arisen was frOm the difference of, dates. The Jury were to determine whether the evidence of Chri&to_ pher Christie was entitled to credit, setting aside the mistake as to the . exaCt date, and whether the Note in question Was actually received by hiM from the Defendant. - • Verdiet for Plaintiff for 301, being the amount of the Note. SMITH against GAIIEGAN. The Plaintiff, ,who is a Taylor, brought this Mtion against "the Defendant for t6l. 2S. being the amount sofa bill•for:,c}oaths. , A letter from the Defendant to the Plaintiff .. .was produced, stating his: inability - at that moment to pay the demand.. The delivery of the goods, the amount, and the letter, were admitted by•the =Defendant's- Counsel, who resisted the AdiOn on the ground that the Plaintiff had :agreed to give the Defendant twelve months, credit, 'and that the first item' in the Plain tiff's bill being dated "the . 2.zd' April, i 800, he had commenced his AdiOn in Michaelhias iri the same year, which was within the'twel:v-e months, and therefore it was contended he was not entitled to recover. It was proved by the Defendant's brother,- thaf the Plaintiff had acknowledged, that he had agreed to let the Defendant have "'the goods at twelve months' credit. PRICE OF Fine Flour - &ss to dos od ' Second . ditto 6os to 65s cd RETURN OF WHEA By Messrs. CHILD and Al eluding only from the 16th agreeably to Ad of Varliamc 68 Qtryters at 9os ad 4 6 _ at 88s od 28 67 - at 86s od 163 12 11 , at 84s ad 6tß at Sos od 5o - at 79s od 10 4 76s od J 9 1260 321 i7B --- at 73S cd 79 8 - at 72S od 241 • at • 71S od 7.3 1 4 1 288 3 8 at 6s oil 87 at 63's od 3 1 Total, 16,989 Quarto 3d. lower /'RICE Q. YEST Bnrik Stock Navy , 5 per Cent. 5 per Cent. - 1797, S per Cent. 4 per Cent. Con. per Cent. Red. 66? 3 per Cent. Con. 67 Ditto Scrip Mink Long Attn. Ditto Short Ann. Ditto Scrip Lord ALvANLEy observed to the Jury, that all bargains' were to be considered as for ready money,. unless expressed to the contrary. They were to consider, in this instance, how 'far the Defendant's letter, dedaritigThiSinability to pay, without no, tieing that the 'Plaintiff had agreed to give him. twelve months' .Credit, did 'away the effea of the. . parole evidence which had been given of the Plain, firs having agreed to give that credit. Verdia for the Defendant. ELEVENTH 'EXPRESS.— No. 566 z, a Prize of One Thousand Pounds, was sold, by : RicharAson, Goodluck, and Co. ; who sold also, in the present Irish . Lottery, No. 9278, a Prize of One Thousand Pounds ; No. 1202, a Prize of One ThOUsand Pounds ; and No. 3568, Five Llundred Pounds, in shares. Tickets and Shares, warranted undrawni, by the latest accounts; continue on sale at their Offices, the corner of Bank Buildings, ,Cornhill, and facing ,the gate of the King's Mews,. Charing_ cross, till Wednesday week, the . 9th of December, when . the Express, with 'the last , Ten .Thousand Pounds Prize, will be due in London. ; and Published by VVzi.z.z A.t4 AP MIGE a SCRIPPS, (of Horse-ferry-road; Westminster) For the Letters for the Editor, &c, (post-paid), must be addressed, We are informed . that the 7Cririd Menagerie' Exeter *Change, is now in :r state of high improve' t men t, afiA t very cozisidErable additions have her o made to that superb colleaion by the late East Indic arrivals, eipecially—of curious _Birds; :,which will render that. unique seleftion of .Beasts and Birds &pill the four quarters of the Gl;)be, still more superiu t than riefore to every Exhibition of the same kind i n the Universe, by the almost innumerable subjeft s t of Natural History the r e o p en t o t h e inspeftion the Public. It has not only been Pideock's war" mitted study to afford satisfaction and entertainmeo t by the great variety of animas assembled at an ex' pence unparalleled, but also that they may be view' ed even by the most timid and fairest of the , Crf" ation, with that admiration which is the natural effeft of their several and distina perfeftions. N. B.—The roost money given for all sorts of Foreign Animals and Birds. Enquire as above. DIED. • On Friday last, at Chelsea, the Right Hon. the Earl 4 Nliltown, Viscount Rusborqugh,,in the nd year of his age' On Wednesday the 186 ult Mrs. Buckston, at her hott o in Grafton-street, Fitzroy : square, On Sunday night, at six o'clock, at her apartments if Queen-street, Westminster, 'the orice . eclebiated. Mrs. fird, who for many years was the ornament of the 8rit . 1.4 S cage. . • CORN EXCHANGE,./ploNDe-Y, We have had a 'great' many fresh :arrivals of Grain in sin c 4 last week. Fine Wheal we:ltt<):l at a retitle - Um of full zs. P quarter since'this . day se'rsmght. There beint a gocid Show of Barley at' Market, that astic l " went off full 3s: per quarter eheap , er, oats; aline quality, are likew4e rather chiaper ; as 1 .14 both Tick and Small beans ; also:White arid Grey Pease. 'Flour the same as last Week. • --- ' "P. - 171"17RX PRICE OF GRAIN; .. .. - .... -,- -. • .( a .)ir board. Ship,. as under: . • 4 Eng7.,NVheat 45 , s - 58S ... c6s . l6ss cd Superfine old Milt a.---s 2 r in. . -- . - 7 ts a - --$ od" Oats - ZiS a 2,-.S - a -,25s " Superfine . .;•,.,, S as a—s od Fine -: - ,3Q s a 3255 FortiAzi do, . ' -. a." - -s Od't Fine ord . -..._ 4 a ---5 0ne . .., . k ,-, ,m -a od Sujoeithre: -, ---7 s a.--s';. Superfine i ,-.- -- • a.---6 .0d "lciifite Pease 48$. a 50 5 " Rye - - ' 265 R524-Pcii Fitt. "- - - - 53 s a.—S - od i fine . • -•-•- 34s a 31‘..-o„0 Seiv Ecilers ~ - .. .t0s :CO 4 Si,pe,tfine: - - ..: oa a -s-.c4 ey•tiitto.36s . a4c-s a - --- 6 0 4 Barley -28 s a-32s a, 356- 0.4- .ine..__ - 4Ss a 0 05 o f Fini . -; - - _ _ .os a 4js- od Small. Beans New 36s a 4 9 4 Superfine - . 47s a cos ; o:c.1 Fine 1.11:1 - CoS aO s 4 Malt. - 4/3s a i6s a fins :04 Ticks; .new .., 3s a 37 5 A Eine - .- . os a 65s.'oct 1 Q 14.-- - ,„,,. - 42s.°' - . FLOUR. - • Pollard. - - - :s.os to . ",,a Bran gs to ros od -to -0 5 "- ,T MARK-LANE, At Los 4s. . Meal-Weighers,ie orNov. to the 21st of N o`''. It. 0 4 63s A •6os rr" 5 5 1s s A 36s :1 55s 6 j 54 5 0 j 53 s 525 di dl is c d 5 0 $ di 4 I's at ' 4 ,c1 i 47 o cJ 4 6 $ A 45 5 -A 44 5 ; t i 0 5 0 1 42 , 5 a d 415 d 40 5 o d 3SS 345 325 Quartets at 298 3zB 10D at 426 at 3 5 / -----at - 20. — 268 -- at 1 57 lo • 6s .. at at 445 --- f at 120 r - tiq at 579 230 1888 130 404 1236 756 at 'l.s,-average 595. lid. han last Return. ' • A RETURN OF FLOUR, , From Nov. -14 7 to. Nov. 26, from the Cocket-Pfecc• 4,, Sacks. s. d. Sacks. s, d. Sacks. sii 5 —I -at - I S' -8 • 87.• :al -66 • - n at uz, • 27. . at . 74.. 5 6 53.. a$ - 65. . 2 , . 3039 at ' "*" --5 -at •72 ' 6 - •20 . -- at - 6 4 6 ' 72 'at 5 1.. At . , 79 ~ 8 30 4t 64 - 3 . 6 • at. 5, 8_193 at 70 230 at 64 1 45 at 5 : 16t pt 69 , 25$ at 63 : 49 'at 1 1 6 to at ,6S 6 5 at 62 10 25 at , 5. 1 393 ar—,6B 44' 'at- 62 6 6 'at !i) . ,; 20 at 67 6 49 at 6z I 26 at 5 3 ' 172 at ' ti 7 -•- 43 'at6 164 3t at '5 - ` ___ _ _ , . Total-19,p26 Sacks.- 7 Average, 665. 4d. 6s. ,id. - higlief than last Return, - • i vso AVERAGE PRICE OF ENGLAND AND WA•• , • . Ending Nov. ai.. • - Si' Wheat . 715. 7d. I Barley 445. ed. I Beans 44 5 . , 61 , . ; Rye . -4is. pd. Oats -255; id. i Pease 455i.,,,r. F STOCKS, EI(DAY. India Stock Exciter]. Bills los. 9s. r n veto° Fundable ditto prein• New'S. S. Stock per Cent.*t7st, Omnium Inver. 3 per Cent. Ditto Ann. 'lank for Account India for Account Consols for Open. 6* o' T F the Next of Kin of MARY HEDLEY , of ceased, who lately lived with Mrs. Blenkins o l , ll o /0 Whickham, inkthe County of Durham, will apply Storey, of Whickham aforesaid, they will hear of sow of to their Advantage. The said Mary Hedley was bornbkie in the. Neighbourhood of, Kirkharle, in the CoulacY ° ' thlimberland, about the year 1737. Whickharn, Nov. as, rEor. • " HOSIERY. COOKE continues to. have on Sale at his 1 1 4, faetory and Nottinghain Warehouse, No. 434 . ,. I„, r , t erf an extensive and valuable Assortment of HOSlEKY°.:iitl i t deicription, which, for elegance, neatness, taste, and 4 " r ielt; has never been equalled, and,, hkt flatters himself; c an ou be surpassed. The, many advantageS he possesses ovet'„cdree other person in, this line Of business, and the pecui:4, of perfection to Which, by indefatigable attention, ant OS ' mited. expellee, he has brought his Manufacl 1 ory, wh'" at igu afford him an opportunity of offering to the-Public 3,..rget: of oods,. superiorin every respect to those of any son, and render alb competition fruitless ; also enable 1:4, 0, accommodate the Public, either in the wholesale, ict',slbil export trade, upon terms more Moderate than Can be afforded by any other House in the Metropolis. IRISH STATE LOTTEPY. TENTH DAY. No. 92.78, a Prize of 20001. No. 870, a Prize of loot. ELEVENTH DAY. No. .566 t, a Prize of lo.sol. No. 2 3,432, a Prize of 5001. SHIP NEWS. CZAVLSEND, NOV. S 9. Passed by—the Ocean, Halsted, from George-Town; 01 , 1114itland, Fenwick, from Quebec. --~` ,~ h i '« .~ 441 3, a 3 Skitr it t ri ‘ 4 stil bt;cl .`l36t a, IS I 4 ! NlOl 3a: • •:, . KATI' rfalav, ' A Juan ." Zr7ite Monday t rh ul- 1)7 1 i 4; must 11 •, ; e rsl - tif Nol/esday , P4: l 4ane, ii WPia ) o t-ti 4 . 1-1 E AT ;.1 1 U MC Mrs. GI7 01 V. Friday , I %tti a O n • of" sattirth i .11g Ri:liard Cuflew (. Yt with nt l oor i S tor:lc lice at this 'I l ivst and Ilvit,ll `t.kr t Itnt m. and t tit:t : 4 ?; ::„ : tnoitse ll rhaia.:: ti etht e 3y 4 1: i . t t 4, t ittet 4: t '1,1 5 N, is so tr h their e P y dtentr: rho lie ir v .etl b , 4t acc urn al q r gr • (ii ie ti 4 er t i s _ st (4 tttli ei ith i e s rpruies la s 4s t 0 Stan, 4 \116 11 14in ( Utz s, A 41„ Mr. 1 Mr