The Sun. — London, England, 1811-07-18 00:00:00

ITV Iy Lor( A • , - 1 -' ll g. The Hon. Genilernin tten tttovea his Roitilution in substance__ " That it appear., from..the passing of the Aa a 1 797, for restr ding the Batik .of England from . paying their n..ies in cash, the property of that Cor- P °Ta ll° ll had increased to an enormous amount ; that. they had divided ,among themselves six millions sterling; that the price of Bank sto, k hid increas, .'td item 118 to 236 per cent. Thit "oiler. such . cirzunisiances, a 13111 had been brought into Parlia- atfur g i v i ng a forced legal value to their ~tes.; Ileal ennsequei , ce, it is likely their profit may i te further increased, Th ai various Members of Par-: nent 4 e Isrle7T bers of the ,Bank . Corporation,] Ind ma y have a direa interest in the Bill ; and that, iheretore their vote 4 ought in consequence to be'dis 11linved." Il Hon. Gentlernan observed, that' he should l 'el Put each name individually, ( hosing rather to: ..Pll ate them geleially, hoe ti the former course was ! urs i p l i i„ 17 , 7. . • On the eliestion fur agreeing to the Resolution te'llo, put, . . 14. ATANNIUG being h ere part i cu l arly ' allUded to Y the l'lniL Gentleman, hoped he should be e' 6 ' hied in treubling the frOUSC. The Hon. Genii - man had hy name referred to lii:., as tile Member f . 's hu '" 1 797 appl:ed iu,the Speaker for advice. The 1 41 was so, and he had no intention of correcting 1 1 :i There was Hot, however, the least it iinilitude .. at the the two eases. In 1797, on Ill" propos al :11)the then Chancel or of the Exchequer (Mr. Pitt ), 0 '":" was grintel to the subscrioers to the Loy i'Y ''' 44ll - Feeling !hat, if he .wad given his vote t` t r i ' l lw Bill, he hhoold liae been voting 10001. e r c 3 P s i l oo ins own pocket, he was' anxious, before • ! dtl ' e to Iht.' vole to satiity his mind, and to do itibllkt a g ' ' '► ini ,a Member of Rirliatneot, and upon the i ‘V ti " llealg &yen by the Speaker, did nos vote. tna ' r dix,i In the pre•ent bill, the Hon. Gentle to i ti )l ' . ` i d rlot 7.taleil any eround of distinct' interest the ' ) , ( ! u 'i'llY bin) tram voting, and he mos, deny , rel ' 4 ' ence 'el'her ii i Bank arector or Bank Pro efr. ,They would nut be beuefited by the pass iCa, ° i ,,'"" Bill ',tie halt -Crown. It had bail 'said file the 'le llink I) re. tots had brought in titeSill ; t i ZY L , l , l ,._ l , d n.(4 had any communication Fith the No- 4 . , ,ir : ti n uh- brough t it in.—tia,, neither soliened, 1 - 10u s ,," ( , ) '' s 'IPPoi tett it. H o Could put it to the ' alty 1 - , l ' ai ; Vilei h . l . Ibii B ill, as in the .case of the Loy did f - ' I'll'ect a''Y Pecuniary interest. it it suestilbeesalrii,rildb,eats.,:nceeniv, withdraw ; but having DO to b e , i ll'i that no Pt aprietor ought -1 etclutit ' d i rnin Voting On The division on the last has.' ther e f, rt ii, 'I. idle warm ers wero • 113 to 35. for 'lt tlit wi i „7" 4 loin left out, still ther e °I 1143 8 ficlt hing by his motion ; auk 1)4.k -tors were to be l' " r li. l iterii se„,, i ..°eld be above 100 Mi.Mbels of clelin eidie i ud “ mg.. to g:v e their tree, cited, .and . Such i5n i ,,'„ 41 8. ,/ s l tv°l en it : , On these Members no swo t 0t , j ,.,"'" a$ interest would 'rest ; as well • Certain M emb l°ll ' have bevn taken to the votes. of the . Ilo u ,, I t i r "'Pan the Distillery, Bill now before c hallen ge d -- ft ., Hon. Gehtle,nan ought to have or th e tyb inb.. 'mes of the Nlembers for Norfolk, all th e Agric : l( 10", ettiobtlAlid. and, in •short, of p l iantl y ,iiit,reituria intervst, for f hey w. re certainly l ' ° Nover i , ;ec :( in that question. It was not, All the ,i' es , " s4 V so follow i he Hon. Gentleman in l l _ 1 .0011 S Whiefl he hid so II reirVantly intro llice4k"-II`"r" was 'tu evidence ' e . that the ~ }, ad di„. , ._. . ‘ ellee to pro. __ ,_, 41 1 bi la i •""u log millions, oar was fir (14.. tiiy ,1 tO Bay WIWI [PI the profits of the Com- - II 6 ' .l ''' . .. n in, . ': ' .l 4e . 're or le t , • but he would ask the • I. , iv1i,..11)-r- , ' ' " 1 1 G li „,,, • —1 Company, holding a Charter p,,.;, •,rtiniciit , Coalman}', r ite, were 1 , which /1, 1 pair' a large 1110,, 1 (? nit atilt, with ileir hands behind cr e4:,..' . :1 4 :' ur thk'' o th er Compar.ie9, neglect ton). , , iiitu pr,h,,, • I,o,lll>nit, si .- 1 . 4 1 1 1 Y and honestly Other the II .„ i1 , ‘ ,. • .; ocis nal increased in value; for instance, Quo o ,', 2,,,R,Hlcenaage Assitranee from 77 to near! ) tl i;i , i 41 ,, , ,`:,._. c.: . The (hand Junction, .Canal vitas ano- Ci,,, l i rt,i ; : ' l ll t. It Wall not exattly fair in tile Roo. . forv„a,d ~i 1 to lravel into anoth e r place, and bring . the 1, 0 4 ° nam e elf a Noble Lord, whom he had anu r to call I • Public h itilt , 3 friend, and state that he had te.i ed in ti,e s a in 11,6 1131111 S whtch he might have in- l't.Peciing i i „. i y: ',. 1( ,. la tie.,king those observations 11 ° the tnolit .11r Frie nd. ,. ..observ.iions so foreign Ptirsti e g b 11 " he It. -adopied the line of conduct nett by Ott ; N Ice ~, madv o i dably. 441 11 1 Lord • . (Cochiane); he had t 44 ti b out 1( 1 is surprise was so great, tha.t "'Ned i f.,, illa" Lftilin to' order, but the House Lpiel„ 4. „--", the impropriety, and expressed their Arde `, it : In . ill th e edlte at Lord King and Lord l ' e illier - u • -ail "P r °Per to mention their nal - tient, as ber g ,I.`l'iali_lt.i.....answer lor himself riot, being Melp 7 14 3 40d ii,11.,10,05e. He should objet. in the 4 ' 6 • n_ et tt, uot „ 'icinng on the ilill exercise his.oWn judg- Ivtlat ii„i ng " l ' v e WAS reminded by the House that he tr„i!t.,,at:lll(.4 (1,,,„,,,,Tinn1h. ell!): interest would not be in the passing or rejeaion of, r, i t „Tttla(i L w i . Y'lloOl continue to pursue that lino ula ' aot ,i, i t t l eit his entnicience told him was cor iiiietirceuld ,; l t rr ed by any thing the lion. Gentle r 1 . 4 1 „' but exelcisitig his abilities:for the, r ,t). .a co in I I ' 4 11‘ d• entry, iiii iti if utlite id not think there was a Gentleman f t)tli d giv ; " c "id he influenced in the vote he ilmy of lu g /4 " there were any such, it was the i „ l ,, i 'glii ii ii , - i i l3) ' Fliend to point them our: He o h i ad b,, b il e i t g s t tiiiti4l4llZik4 rtiire7herdPAOrrptioegne labur'sle!le.B lit n ns h te ea a d d 01,4'1' might li i iiii ht Of my Lord Arden, his • Hon. i i „ d r e lit e.„ ui I : l4 ve taken the first on the list, and th,,, the N u t ( l l ' a Ye found the name of the Speaker i.,i i i i : • ' Frie iii i ::. Lord was introduced because his (4' k NrCeval,4Vare that the Right Hon. Gent. b” lu ig, i ) "-Id too much of dignity, too much' se l i tho uoit 4111(1:18y...i.e! the observatia, and therefore p rv, fre e. \\,., tit stenre, and that he should go' i stiti uts et NI n'tlenre6t to the statement of the ltttilie4 a Ban k,, that lie did not think correct, ' n aafi 4 History of the Bank front 'their first W qi k 1. " 1 1 ifs t, , th -pt • : ),'- r. '0 ShOW that they . had al- A K up a clo , hi, , se connettion with the Govern. th " 1 4etI G w . le, i10e5it..,4:0,,,ds satisfied that every Gentleman in ,1," 4 . Ge m ] ' ke Quit Motive which induced the 4.4.11ieri.....it W3g7lt,:indiot°, side the mune of,- Lord Ar.. e ll sfiter lift hate uii .61rodur:eil--(Alt. Creeiley . lilt* , s° SiiirOdlit:ed it.) The manner, 41% I . ath a . the , Ito-44, torh,i,t,es t)etrvations, were. too glaring, Ci - -- t he linuse of the motives of ;the Persurii'utieloan. NVit , r nitht , we rt tot ti h rtlpe6t-to the glegtion,'if ' I, iit ci aVe ii ' profit4illl:ll.eit tO %Ow .beA;a4fl:. they t .t4tit 'e would e ailbjectunder discussion, go to the length of intrinfiing on tbe liberties of the House. rt tie, right tit wit, lug was to be refused lo Bank Direaars., there V/BS not an indivicltial in the House who might not be said to be interested,• for there was was not a holder of Bank , niitvs who Was not eventually, [An hap,, to brnrfited. 'Mr. W. SMITH jeetified the purity of Lard King's' creelua. He was not satisfied that the Proprietors of Bank Stock were not interested, at least it it had not been proved that they .had not a direct in. e ferest, it might be preseenedthey had. The Hon. Gentleman had some calculations •to-shew that the -die idends had increased on an average about t 0 2-eds, being about 50 per cent. and this would prove that in the 14 years a Proprietor had just doubled his ca pital. If the presumption of interest was to be al lowed, that appeared to be a reason 'for refusing the votes of MeMbers being Proprititote. The House would in twat case proceed on the usual principle on s hich ell bodied rated, not because the honesty of the individual was snspeded, but because others might make use of that. interest to carry any measure. That clause of the Bill which prohibited the exchange of 'Bank notes for guineas, *AS the greatest stab to the credit of the Brink that could be given. Some of the Directors, be thought, would do weft to move its being left out. The conduct of - Lord King, he thought; was not entitled to praise k he wished it had not been. pot in execte.. Lion. He was however free to say, that the .worst part of he Neble Lord's conduct, was ,in birth to this Bill. Mr. BANKES denied, that in 1797 the 'Proprie. tors ..f Bank Stock oughkoot to ha-ye-voted on t he liesbiaion Bill. Tbat measure had not been btoitgbt forward for their benefit (although it had eventually turned out to be advateageous. to them). it was a question of eenerelenterest ; and as such, the Pro - - prietors of Bank Stock wereas fully entuletleci vote upon it as any other INlembers of Perhemeet., His optnions were ttie same on the present On the principle maietained by the IloileMoeer, thepoioessor cif land"d property ought not to be per.. Mittel to give his vote oe the pr. sent Bill, for such an individual was much more deeply interested in the cues! ion than the most extensive Proprietor of Bank Stock in exiteence, ABliECßobail R supported the motion; and contended that his Hon, Friend *as as niece en titled to 'irtrodtice . the name of Lord Arden into the d!scuision, as the Gentlemen opposite had been to introduce that of Lord King., The CHANCELLOR .01 the EXCHOMER contend ed, that there was not the propriety in the intro duction of the name of 'Lord Arden into the dis cussion, as there had been. in the. introduction of that olLord King. He did not se e that the ,cire cumstance of Lord .Arden's name happening to stand at the head of the list of Proprietors of Bank Stock justified the. Hon. Gentleman in referring, on an occasion like the present., to that Noble Lord'scearninetiOn before a Committee, on a sub ject of a very diffeient nature. As to Lord King, tee eubjed could not be discussed withoUt mention ing The very subject of the debate veAs the conduct of that Noble teed, and the very °bled . of the Bilt before the House was to pretent that con. t:uct (rum becoming general. The Hon. Mover It :d treted this' seeject, as he bad frequently treated other subjects, with a sort of irony of a elniractet so •cl , ,uhtful as to leave his true meaning completely -• uncertain. Fortunately that did not much signify. To, spew theerior of aneotionieg tee name of Lord King, ho mentioned the name of Lord Arden.; and then said that he (the Chandellor of the Exche quer) had been as unjust in: the °he ease, as , he (Mr. Creevey) was in the other. Toe injustice of the Hon. Mover wakunquesi iotrable very apparent; and so far he was certainly extremely Wow in - the instance which he had afforded. tie (the Chan. cellar of the Exchequer) denied that he had ever called Lord King a Jew or a F,'edlar. What he had said W3S' that the Noble Lord was the first itulivi 7 . dual of his description, who bad acted in -the way in which JeWs and Pedlars Were aecnstotneil to act. As to the question .itself e the 'argtiment. of his 'Hon. Friend near thin was conclusive upon Mr. HUMERI' opposed theinotton, as leading to to the most Scribes incotivenieuces. 'Adverting to the conduct of the Bank, tie said teat he 'hoped he should not be suspected of ,undue yes in de claring, that, having beeu for thirty years a mer chant in tbe City, he had never heard the conduct ef,that Body arraigned, although they frequently declintela*rdiee teeaseieranee• which commercial ,men requested:of them estimfeing eheecharace ter of, Lord King, the House ought, in judg- mem,. not to "forget what - had loog been the te corded opinions of that Noble Lord . ' on the' sub ject of the currency of the-.couniry, and to, ellow for the coeseqeetice of his adherence to his own principles. Mr. CERCVEY :made a short reply. He intro duced the name of Lord Ardeo, because in a Com mittee of that House - , the Noble Lord had been as vigilant a defender of his tees' as Lord Kip g was of his fended interest.; In this point, therelor e , in the defence of their mutual property, the two No ble Louie might fairly be compared to each other. As to what had been. said of his irony, he con fessed that he could have no chance, in a . Compe tition of jokes with the Chancellor of the Exche quer. • 'rho S?RAKER observed, that the question was a mixed one of law and fact. To the fornier, alone, he might be allowed to speak. V' the Journalpi were opened, it Would be found laid down in them, two hundred years ago, and then stated as an ancient rule, that interest disqualified from voting. Tf the cases were considered, it would be, how ever, clearly perceived, that this interest must be• direct and pecuniary ; ilhit it must he an in terest separately belonging to the individuals whose votes were questioite,l, and that the rule never applied' to bodies of his 'Majesty's subs jests, or to the questioni of 'Strut; It was evident that the Howie would not allow persons whci,had put 'down their names for sums in support of canals or other, undertakings of a similar nature, to vote upon questions conuetted with those undertakings. On the subject of the Loyalty Loan, the House had, therefore, in his opinion, . rightly decided. But he thought it equally clear that. the House had done well in not disqualifying any vidual from voting on a questi:ar of internal taxa tion or of colonial t'egitlation, whatever the interest which such an individual mit,ht possess in that que,a. Lion. . . e Resobtion tildr. put and h'egatiieh wirn4 but a division. , • • _CIRCULATING MEDIUM BILE.. 'The CIIANCELLOiI at . 'The ExCfteduktt 1111vingi "moved the Order of the bay for the House to rte , .solve itself into a Committee on the Circulating-Mel dium Bill, . • Mr.' BANKEs Made a Variety of observations 13n the. three shilling Bank I'ukens, 'norso much' With respect to their value, as the execution of thiil, which lie termed most wretched and mean; and very disgraceful to the chat - at...ler of those Arts vvhich, in his'opinion, were intimately,Conneded with the hotfoot-and prosperity of every , civiliv , d country. ; It would seem that becaue the material was b4Sey It was intended to allOvv the .vorkthanship upon it to be base . also. 'Exeent the Sardinian, he had'itfevr; seen a [modern coin so contemptible, and the seple-1 riority of the French coins in particular, even ilewn; to their kipper curreney, Was:great. .. 'Mr. DetslT 'declared, that' the 'citify motiVe'Which i could'induee him to agree io ihe. Speaker's leaving] the Chair, was; that the Bill was to be only tempo-i rary. Adverting to. the agreement of a number of. merchant4,'Sce; in 1745, to take Bank notes at their : accitstomed value, hL expresSed his opinion that a similar agreement on the present'occasion have sufficiently met the apprekendA evil. Mr. MA NNIIstO thu the Bank•Corpoia— Lion had no-interest in the Measure. Mr. G. JOHNSON : said a, :few werds, • the precise' tendency of which we could not coil-et.. Mr. 131t6IJOHANt entertained 'such aninsuperable objeetion tcethe principle at the Bill, that he Was persuaded no :modification Of that principle .in Committee would render riepn expedient, or-even harmless measure. He would avail itims-A1 of the present 'opportunity tb 'ask seeme - few - queStien's respelling the non-descript 'currency .that had re eeetly been; issued - by the Bank. He Understood that it had been coined at the national mint. Was • that the ?' If so, by Whbei 'was the expense defrayed ? The nominal Lvalue of these tokenfravas three shillings. What was 'heir real value I Cer tainly they were not worth three shillings. How were they debaSed ? Was it by the introdtAion of silky, or by the diminution of weight.? Why not affix twcrshillings and sixpence to ahem as the initial price, and then procure an Ad of P trliament to make theM pass for three shillings) „ - f h s would be to put them on a footing with the notes. W 3 S well known that there had been a ~g reat want of change all over the kini;;;dom, and where mere than in the metropolis. Bankers had' been 'obliged to go into the market fur' it. The uudepreciated Bank note of. one . pound.could not, it steered, be exchanged for t:o even of the base ,and deprecisteil shillings 'ciallent. 'One hudarell Bilk four Pf I. notes :tad been frequently given for 100 IS ounrA worth of silver. Had. this circumstance been ad verted to in the - Iste Bank issue) -if not, , it -the.Lto- : keteS had been made too large, they. also would scion . , be sold - at a 'p'retYliern. — kite b'efor'e th'e House: was defective ,in every vetedt.. It Wetsip constructed, notwithstanding fill the attention to it of the Crown *lawyers, that it would Make the nishment of the crime which it enacted, different in England mid 'Scotland. in Eh?lll*nii misdemeanor subjecting the offentiet• to fine and ttri prlsonoieflt: in Scotland 'it velSold bez miedeinetiftor, which the .10ge might punish at,liis own dist:retire) with finc, imprisoriment, or ti . anSporeition. chew that this was ti discretion Vehieb ongliffee to be trusted to the Scotch Courts, he instanced the case of a flirri4ter of the must reStiectsblo character and anon eminent talents, e Ito, leaving been con eicied ii, Scotland of the misdemeanour of lending Paineta flights 'of Man to a friend, was ',ent e ri c:e a by the judge to fourteen years treusportat ion to New South Mr. M'Aeopeo, in reply .to some of the q !estions Of the 0017. Gentleman, stated that the thiee shil ling Bank token weighed eight pennyweights and eleven grains; and that at the present, price of silver it waskworth two shillin .s, and teine-peure halfpenny. These toketia,had been issued 'by the Batik,'- solely for the cow enience of the public. It had.been sa in another place, and by a high authority, that the Bank had made great sums by their issues of coin. What was' the face? Fonr ttlilliotis of dollars `had beets issued since 'twee. When the Bank aaitred their .tionainal valueto ,five .and there might he these' millions in circulation (one tildlion . haying - probably been Melted), - in whitill there would therefore bel'•'lolK Of '7[1.,0001.- 'The ptiteyt : sityer of 0 11 4 Y.eitra,ftd,beett that• it wasa , tnpaseble to coin the currency of the realm, and the Bank had stepped forward to lessen the cons sequent inconvenience. Thellcad'already liberally supplied the:Bankers in-the'tnetroptiliS with their tokens; and it was their intention,' as soon as pos.; sable, to send down large quantities to the - vartorel commercial towns in the country; in' one week, they issued 35,0001. worth, which was' half' as much as the; whole silvel coinage of the present reign. Mr. Ross thonght it but justice to the Batik' to state,lharthey had lent themselves to the public sell ice with considerable loss and inconvenience to themselres.. Every body t.sisnware that the Silver coinage of the country had nearly disappeared:— Under the present eircum;iandes a new coinage was impradtithible. It Goyerinnent Were; et the preSeet liiment, to coin a number of shillings and sixpences, they would not be current - a week. How would the HoteGentletrian correct thisevil ? He had heard Gentlemen talk very flippantly of obtaining hellion as easily as claret. But with what would they pur chase?' ft was , impracticable to procine it, elf(' in this slate what was to be done ? Would they have reduced the intrinsic value of the coin of the realin ? . Thepro . :. priety of doi g this had been discussed a century ago. It had been advocated' by:Mr. Lowtidea„ and' resisted by Mr. Locke - and otheis. The latter tri umphed ; a. silver coinage of .fullyalue, which oc castoried.to the.country a loss of two Millions and a half, was. issned, and it instantly disspireered.--e- With respect to the execution of the Bank tokens lately issued, it could not have been bettee, hut I,y a delay that must have been injurious; The Com mittee of Jhe PriVk Council on Coins:had called 30 or 40. Merchants and bankers together, and 'had asked them whether it would be advisable to pre vail on the Bank to lame. these tokens ?. They an , SiVete4 unanimously in the *affirmative. Applica tion was in consequence made to the Bank, arta they instantly complied. Mr. P. Moot could not. allow that any t'e'otv , it - wins - required try VAN , :TTART, advertingto 111? dot it - getting nourable and Learned - Gentienvin; shid that hti had Weil •eveti 'il'hArd 'guinea !giveti for tWeoty tiglf...ited the expediene)- f P • - tivaibi k the Ifiti Into two Bills. ThaiigitttEn. oh;eirved, that the proper time rot Such a h"rolforrttsWWßUlTE(Tifti - itlit'ilispoil if ;hi Treseht (1i PStir~tl. . . . •, The Huuse then divided, *hen the nugnbil Were, For.goltiginto . a - Cominittee .- 71 • Apinst it . , M i.t ajorityi ' -6 4 On . te4atte' tit* alit ttillery %.#e The CHANCELLOR of ttietkt tit.O.tih;tl inn f,is h 4 in .the Con>rttE tte, ptiSpositig 'snore al tera junq and additions' to 't He terfintmendKi v-r. bal aiterat.on in '16661 . 5t . tbr 01 , ptiti)oso making it inure ekplicit. It `m - as rhotith that 'the` 1611(Avitig provision should be sub joined " Ttlat 'etery' person Who might offend aga i nst the Bill, sh,l u ld bed e tied and adjud.,;ed guilty of a tnistle , neabour."— W.l it respeci to Sinn= land, lie had' air:additional 'clam., to propase, Much provided, ‘ 1 Tnat veer) , person committing the offence in Scodantioli.,ll he by Ane or priionttleA, 'or by - such one nr other of Ow ia1:1 Tiviiishrnents as the 'Jtidges - there ' ttiay 'think tit kt dirett.", A long discossion mow on the first clause, irt w Mr:W. Taylor, Mr. H. Thornton, Mr. Debt, the Chancdrortitl'he txcliequer Mr.W. Stnitti, were thn principal speakers. It was finally carried without a division. The Other Clauses 'met with hate opposition . . On th'e third beineread, Mr. W. SMITH inquiVeci why the Trtiviiitin 'was not extended to Ireland. enAII6ELLOR of the Escoxauth repeated the explanation - 4i'ven "on 'a twiner evcning by Noble Friend ;under the Gallery. The mea6.uit %yes intended ro..keep things, in, their present state: till their next Se:sion of Parlianivnt. ltit Wero extended to Ireland, a 4 payitirni tit gold lvici beet stipulated - in that country . tor thelaSt twenty Fears, it would hays l the of ea of materially .ohanging 'the 'situation of things. TIBRNEY contended, ' that things would not be kept in their , preserirtate. by the titfaSkire bein g vbhliiiiiPtcrinatid 'Shit Scotland, as its etl;ict would be to solididl thetad whiZ:hiemained in this conotry, 4r.eland. ThebIi&NCELLOR of the Excnisspati said, htit 'had not pretendld to deny that the ineasUltw3s (11 Naive not 6t43ing extendedityls e l t ind ; s.et, iindac all the citcern , toces ,(di v e tone eonsiderelloo) , ,l ) 6 thought it most prudent to restrict it-in its operation - to England and Scotland. , After a few . thitalloTn . lVir. 'J. Tiera ney, Mr, Dent, and Mr. Vansittart., Mr. BR 0 PGH &fit ()hie:NO, that.l( atl..tbe:gol4 We're to be ``thus Sent to Ireland, it might ,b7itltat • coritntuditTe's ‘7virtild poi:1)e bear ivki'prices"here, paper .would be our unfy.cirtulating . trtdiutri. While he said this, however,„ he , not mean in •asr-erit that Bank paper would not experi eh c e.a f urt her...4e. pr'eiatttri. The fourth- Clause pased witho' tit ohfretir.itiiiri. The last, that respetting.th;orland,•was objeded to by Mr. Brougham and Mr. Tierney, aN goring 04 JUdgei totontieh power. • . The Clauses tplirig rtgreed to. • The CAAseer.t.oa .ot the &Cent:ol7Eß exprekped wish to come to some tuideistai%ding as to Illy toot at which the Bid should b e a g ain debated. He crin ceived, after ,the 1.114Cu511014 fli4 had had, it , A ,, a 4 not intendt!cl to debate it, both on' the ,iteport and oil the third rcactog.. Mr. ABEIitit ,, IBIR said, li4t Hoo. Friend, the, Member tor Brslot, Whohad given notice that he intended to move certain Resolutions, ithposing restrictions on the Batik isiues, still.persisted in Ws detrinitialian. He ? hewever,did not object to an arrangement df the nature proposed. Some lartnercouversation took plane, In which Mr. Brougham, the Chancellor ot.• the Exchequer, Mr. Tieiney, and Mr. Dent participated. in the end it was onderstbodliiat the Bill dlOtllj be terl 0n:444111r on its-third reading,, when LiroughaV i s, Resolutions were to be brought lin . . ward and disposed of at the saute time. The House theo're'soined, and the Report of the Committee. Was Ordered to be received to-melt row, • . Mr. Ttrsartarrese to Make a motion, which grew out of a question which he had put a few ,Verlille ago teal3e'ittleinati connected with the Bank, io which he received no answer. He. then itiMied felt " Copiessof all cbmmonications between the T fires- tors of the Bank and the C.haocellor of the .Eketie.s quer,' respecting the Gold Coin Mr. MANNING could have had no hesitation, the other night, in answering the tvieStinii; But that he' wa, un willing to intrude upon the. , House, which w.ts then about to divide. He had now no hesiia, tido in meeting it, and giving it an answer. tneasure: had neither originated' With Goveth ir e u t nor with the Batik, and no cotnmunication ltd i tstivn place on the subject. If , therefore, the motives were entertained, no return could be ruadd'ur Mr. Tfearifor wished to know what resolution 4 the Bank Directors had come to. slf they had cootd to no resolution on a subjeal of such magnitude, much might .be saiduf -their forbearance ;=--ano. hr t word. perhaps ought to be use d.: 04 this suoj , tt people would form their then ideas,. and the public at large would not doubt btu they had good reasow for being silent. • s ' The Cum4citt:ort of the EXCIOQUER observed, the Right Hon. Gentleman would have the same o f portunity of lnaking any obiervations he inigtif hat ei to offer on the sui7tl' if the- inOtion were not ae ceded to, OS if it were returned nil. 001-10,;sa Were to call for .papers, where hone existed, if would seem to crinVey a sort of disapprohatief supposed neglect. MN MANNING explained; -Mr. TISKNEY thpukht it very strange, It re. minded hint of what occurred at:the - renewal oltile Bank Charter, when he pdt a question' to the Chart4' cellor of the Bsolieriner and the Uovernot of the' Bank, who were then in the Koase they were Much i3nitiiii - raSseCfs that they looked at reli:1) otter four or ti e'tnioutes without speaking, and at list gntfe 1141 no answer f and be was obliged to repeat the question.