The Sun. — London, England, 1811-07-02 00:00:00

~~~ i iir,Ternorie r yitico: --r it 'l6lfrififfit (7d . " by ""ifie - fliTiff 41,e, Wltich Wo3 .. , gieeti to IA ititatit it titri%toit. STAN riots exprt-ssek i his wish to postpone ti.otion for ti , e sec.,ott r• ading tit hi 4 Circulaitog itlititu RI, w:ii h sto for this !lay, till to.mor, ToN, 11;s rt as:io !or noun; so, he would 'reel; st . itt.. thei. Loidslops. Ht had grated in the mit,et, dist a cellato weal int..ndrd to' tho rents recently .doe to hint to IT pain lit mortcy. , 1-1-t tnenitone , l no names, hut it since turh. ed out tom the landholder ,Illudett to was a Mt-m. ti'or of that ttp. ioe, and trout whom he teceivrd a Jett kir, exprossing his desire tir L it the 'rnotion r .nay be ...tponed ; he therefore thought it tit I, j.paiee to do so. His Lordshi e s then tno.ed to v the Of Mer for summoning their Lordships on .I , otie motion for to-morrow, which was ordered ac, migly., i.e Vexatious Arrests Bills, and the Spirits D . :tweaek Susp;ll , ion Bill were returned ..from the C Antikons by Mr. Luslongton and other.Meem. • 13, rs. TUE CONFERENCE. Mr. Cluarrne, Usher of the :Black Rod, thm H i peared ;It Cite bar, and acqulinted men . Lordshi! 4 ifial Ihe Commons were, waiting the tiL. sirM coLference in the Pinned Chambel. Accordingly the Ear, Gi a' oon (Doke of Mantras() ;it Is Bathurst ard Gro,vepor, the Bishop ot Choi tt yr, Lords Walsinghatn, Arden." and Redoidale, Nvvr, nominated Commikoners to manage the Col tern nco 00 the via ot the linuke. Their Lords.ips rep tired to t h e Painted Chamber, and, after tin interval of a tew minut , s, they return ed; when Bail Grahlm. reported that the Confer ence had heed duly held with the Managers from the Com:lions, ant th,t the Commons did not in si.ir upin , thei,r Amendments made to the htsolvent nehror.i' Adjoutneu till to-morrow. fIOUSE, OP' COMMONS, M )NDAY, JULY I. The 1../.putv of the Black Rod having summoned this Hutiso to the House of Peers, the ker and 4 :mother of Members accordingly at . On t.1.w0 rtinin the Speaker informed the 116uqe that the timid. ,Aiisent had been given by twomission to ,seteii.ll public and private Bills. [Vor s,ie our it , port of the proceedings in ,the Howie of Lords.] A, Mef.s.ige .from the Loris announced their Lordsh.ps' Aisetit to the Sphittt DrawUack Suspeo. skit bill. WE AV I.ltS' PE TITION. C , )1110 STA tr 4 WO( eXpreliSed E rie w►ih to COrreA niitireineStiltiffioll kt'ffiCllll3.lolll.l abroad, of a state. meat in to, speed It a kw eenings ago, on the con. sioeration of the lit port of the Committee on the Weavers' 1 4 etAion. He had been stipansed to bay that t6ere were 2.5 0 490 persons who received pato. chill relict in Manchester. • What he had Mutiny said, was, th'.it that' number received renidif in the of .. Mat)che,ter,, town- 804)4, Sioce the e.v , thug to which tie had just a 1 ittae,t, he.hact received ti statement Iron the Church Wardens of Manchewer, of the teal situatton of t , ,wn with respe.l to paupers. By this state me st it aced that the gretitem number that hod b'en rel,o rd al. any trip te nd ; in 11131 town, did not ex.c.oeti 9,uno - ; inclOding paupers of evcry tint., the a.;,11, the infirm, the wiv ,, s of militia men, the poor tlie 'workfii.iuse, and in shoot ever) deicriplon O' peetions who must luiVe been relieved, whether trade had or had not flourished. The C: arch Wu & its othaved that they had the satisfac tion of adding, that the number of paupers at the preont inwoo,:ot in the town of Manchester,, was not miterial:y Ottlerefit train what it was at the con• ut the last-year. CoMmtrFEE OF FINANCE. Mr. BA i K tot presented a Report from the Com mittee at Pubje Expenditure.—Ordered to be piloted, STRAW-PLAT MANUFACTURE. Mr. GiLEs stated; that he had had it in contem plation to pre 131 a Pe.ition front the INlanutAlurers ot Strav Pfaff, complaining of the injury which they botoietied incons , gtteice of a manutati ure of it simi. lar witure tieing carried on to a considerable e xt e , te t 01110114 the prisoners, of war in that country. An iniormahly ould prevent him from presenting this Pet , tion, lint he had the SatirifaiiiOrt to state, tor the genet . li inf. rotation 01 those iwicerned, that hay. ing oride inqumes oil the sNbject in the proper de partment (~ Got ei 'mien , he found that ii had , ex. cit.-1 aitetitioi ot his M jesty's Ministers, who were doing ad in t hVil power to alleviate the hard ship» cont r lanied ot, A great port 111 th e . evil ar o s e twin the tacilit) with which the soldiers who were placed as sentinels over the pi isoners, allowed them. helves to be bribed to permit the introduction of t;trsw into the'Prisons ; and he suggested the only rented which occurred to his mind, namely, &e -clat...ooy to change the regiments employed on that set vice. vExATlctus A RittsTS. The CHANCEt.i.OII of the ExenEQUER, adverting to tny Bill how the Lords, ehangitig the sum for which individuds were snhjett to arrest, observed, than. through some inadvertence the Bill had been read offiy a first tone us iho !louse of Commons, and that the further stages hod nun been proceeded with. As it was a Hi 1 1 .61 cobdideratile importance, and as he was tint aware that any ohjeittion existed to to diumediately passing ,into a low, he suggested the expedievey of waving the ordinary &Liry in the progress of the Bill through the flon4„e, and of a l. In mg the pie , elit Hitt to go forthwith through its vari tty Stkigv4, that it aught be ready to ti:c.:M3 the A..svrt I. Th e se k ottq l staitoci t that unless any indieposi. tion ttionitested to such a CourNe of procetAing as that reeiiitimyodeii by,the Right Hon. Geode. oi ) , Houiw was at 'wiled liberty to atlopi The NH VA is read a ,eeond time and committed ; the It port wai elved, and the Bill was read a thitd time and pasl/4ed. MR, PALMER'S CLAIMS. Mr. PA 1.111::P. cleel.ittii it lo be his intention, in the next Session, once mere to bring XII . . Paimer's Cial,n. tinder the cousid,•ration of 'Parliament iii the sh,ve of a Bib, When hr trusted ilint Mils subject meeive its•finat disens , ion and decision. it.:F.coutt`t . ()id ADMIRALTY AT MALTA._ Lord etki;llllANe g•tv:t nooce, that lie would movv (o ti w.iat d,sy we were tuted.ge w bear), for ;c►~iie~ 'apers re tine to the capture o . . . the Fisgund ;, aria also thal he would tn, ye Mt hunan...: AddresN to hifilloyal iiightle.a the Prince It% ut, 01,,iying that he would be graciously pivayed to 01.1 , r toe rec.,' of tat. prem.nt Judge of the Vice. Court ut Admiralty at Malta. ' . MR. FINNERTY. Mr. CHAPLIN, atter some prefatory observations, itl whiCh he said that he receied a icoer front the Under Slieriff of Lincoln, declaring that Mr. Finnerty had offered money far' other apartments ; 34 also a statement from a Magistrate, in contradic tion of what had been advanced by M. Finnerty, presented a Petition from Mr. Merry veember, the Gaoler of Lincoln Castle, complaining of gross and scandalous misrepretehtation in the Petitions 'pre sented to the House of Commons by Mr. niftier ty, defending from the charge of oppressive. conduct towards that individual, and stating that the restraint that hart been imposed on Mr. F. was-in. consequence of his having attempted to seduce a turnkey from his duty, -by bribing him permit him (Mt. F.) to be criminally connected with a female convict, in the same pri,on. The Petition concluded by praying, that the House would Call,,e a strict inquiry to be made into the, cubdat of the Petitioner (Mr. Merry weather) through the whole of the, transaction. - -On the motion that the Petition do lie on the table, Mr. WHITBREAD observed, that he was glad, to fled that the gaoler was desirous of an inquiry into his conduct. AS to the alleged impropriety of which Mr. Finnerty had been guilty, although he by no, means justified it, if it had really occurred, yet it did not at all warrant the treatment which that Gentleman had received. He had, however, had a letter from Mr. Finnerty, distinctly stating that the offer alluded to was not his, but had been made to him try the turnkey, and that, on his relusal 10 avail himself of it, the turnkey, in order, as he conceived, to be before-hand with him, laid the information on which the peseta accusation was fouuded. .The Hun, Gentleman had ~userved, that he had received a letter trom the Under Sheriff of Lincoln, stating hat Mr. F. had off:red money for other apartments. Why ha lhe been relu.ed ? Why were not better apartments accessible to him as to ce her pm isoners There was not any thing in the present petition, or in all he had aid on the subj , d, which went to dishrote that' Mr. Finnerty had sutreted nni,:h op pression, and had been treated in an unusual dud in an unnecessary manner. The getietal question as to the propriety 01 entrusting to a gaoler the cretiun of aggravating or matiOting•• punishments at his pleasure, rewained just the Sarno as ever. Mr. CHAPLIN replied, that Mr. Finnerty had ex• pertenced the greatest indulgence, and Jiad even ben allowed by Mr. Merryweatlier to walk in his own garden, until he proved ternself unworthy of such - liberal treatment. Another prisoner in the same gani, Mr. Prakard, had represented the treat ment of the,prisoneis 'direa contraditti ht to the statement of Mr. Finnerty, and :had diatinetty as serted that he himself experienced every ityluigence con..istent with the execution of the sentence of the taw. Mr. iitIOUPHANI contended that this statement of Mr. Drakurd was wianswer to the statement of Mr. Finnerty. On the contrary, it was an aggraVatioDPl Mr. Finnerty's case. Could any thing be more.repre hensible than that two individuals convicted or si milar misdemeanors, and sentenced in precisely the same words, should be treated at the discretion of a gaoler, the one with mildness, and the other • with `rigour ? There was out point, left untouched in the gaoler's Petition. Not one word did he say in an :swer to Mr. Finnerty's statement, moat he had been subject to solitary ceofitietnent. He trusted that the power of a g4oler, simply to deprive ',one inch of his persoual liberty, and to doom another, individual; convicted .of precisely the same orEtnee, to solitary imprisonment, would be made the sub. jest of Parliamentaty consideration in the next Session. Mr. Secretary RYDER denied that even Mr. Fin nerty affected, in his own Petition,, to state that be sudered solitary confinement. Alt that he stated was, that be had in one or two instances not 'Oen persons who wished to see him, Since the last tlii eUSSioll of this subject he had taken Oil possible means to inquire into it, and he found that there was not the slightest ground for 11)031 of. the state ments imide by Mr. Finnerty and.lris liiends, and that the few statements wkiich had a- shadow of foundation were grossly exaggerated. After some further observations by Mr. Brongham and Mr. Stephen,, the Petition WiJS 01%lered to lie on the table. COM'OREAL PUNISIIMENT. Mr. Secretary RYDER advertin g to a Case stated by an Him. Baronet (Sir F. Nutlett) on a late discus- SiOD respecting the corporeal punishMent of a man ,of the name of Evers, who had cut his throat in the Isle of Wight to avoid being flogged, obsetved !bat the Hon. Baronet laboured under considerable misap prehension nn the subject. On inquiry, he learnt from the General of the District, that the ,name of the man alluded to by the Hon. Bari net was not Evers, but Avery. He had route to the Isla of 'Wight from Tilbury, as a recruit of a ,suspicions ctraraCter. As soon as he had receiyed the final payment of his bounty, this man with three others deserted ; but being subsequently taken in plain cloaihs by a press-gang at llytie, he was brought back to the depot, anoriad by a Court Martial.— Betote, however, the sentence of the Court Martial had been promulgated, this man atteMpted to cut Iris throat, Such was the statement of the real tact, as it occurred. .He Wits aware that it did not - at all r.iffeet tie general question of the expediency, or in expediency, of corporeal punishment ; but it was certainly desirable that these Individual cases should be described with accuracy, and he eertaialy 'could not conceive a more aggravated instance of mili tary delinquency than the one to which he had just called the attention of Hense. Mr. WHITBREAD admitted,, that the case of this individual was not one of peculiar severity, but rat the same time contended that it by no meant operat ed against the argument for the abolition of flogging. Since the last discession on this subject, he had re ceived a letter, which to him appeared practically conchts , ve upon it. It was from a person having the chief command at the recruiting parties in a dis trict of the country in which the temptations to re mks to act in a manner meriting punishment were peculiarly strong. This Officer, however, declared In his kqter, in the most emphatic languncge, Mat V e found coipore.ii punishment to be completely unne ce,sary, and a hat the Mangles, if- there were n»y in his district, were mouldering awiy in a . g tett: Mr Brioucimti swied, that the motion olf which his Hon. Friend, *lir) was nbt (lien present '(Sir F. Burdett), kid Oven notice for the` nuxt Session of Parliament,' was not founded on any particular in staace of bt verily, but would proceed en the gener3l question of the expediency of corporeal piin:.innlts in the araiy. Sir C. .I.iontiaLL expressed his firm convielion that there were cases .in which set ere corporeal pu nishment in a reiment was indispensable, attiless ir , deed death in such cases was tO be uniformly re - soiled to. As to solitary impriionnieni, that he was persuided was in few insianTes pratticahie. The Hon. Bart. was proceeding to explain his views of the subjea, when The SPEAKER interposed, and suggested the pro priety of abstaining farm any general discussion, there being no quesiion before the Huuse. ASSASSINATION. Mr, WIIITMEAT) observed, that as the House Was unoccupied at that Moment, he hoped he might be indulged with sesing a kw words, which it was, otherwise his intention to have (leered to their 'no tice on the question of adjeurnment. His oeject in rising Was to give the-Rt. Hon. Gent. opposite, or any other of his Majesty's Mieistees, tan opportunity Of making an avo eat, similar to that which he ,under stisod had been made in another pl 'ce by Marquis Wellesley, on a eubjeti intimately involving the chits raster of the British Government, and the welfare and safety of every individual of the:Royal Family. The House would be aware tht he ,alluded to the horrible doe.trines which had recently been 'promul. gated by the preSs respediree aseessination. That had been preached up as a duty undo"; certaio cir cumstances, which no circumstance's could justify. Were the writers to which he' alluded' aware that they lod to the perpetration of crime on the innocent and meritorious, by the arguments in which they recommended the perpetration of crime, one —cer tainly net ineocenteecertainly not meritorious—but of whom they were not - to set themselves up as the judges and the punishers. When these persone held nut the examples of antiquity for the pet eetre riots of wen crimes, or such deeds, as he presumed they would call them—When they described the individtiale of former ages, by when) those exam ples had been afibrded, as the beneqelors of man kind, and as ever since having been so estimated, he supposed it Would be in vain for hits to suggest tp them the great change which had taken place in ,morel duty, by the Christian' system of religion. It would be in vain, lie resu ned, for him to point out to their consideration, that by the, mild dalliers of that religion an eye was no longer cleinao.fed for an eye, or a tooth for a tooth. To the persons to whom he alluded such an appeal would in all probability be fruitless; but he would call op the advocates of assassination to shew a single instance in which 'the crime had been successful, or had been followed by the advantages anticipated by the shartsighted per petretoiss of it. Aeer the asi!issination of Caesar, had the liberties of Rome been better secured than before ? Had the knife of the assassin been always pointed at tie proper object ? Had it net frequently . been directed against the breast Of the innocent and meritorious ? against the breast of Henri IV. ale! 'Louis XV. - of France; of the treat Pence of Orange ; and twice in our own days, of the existing Monarch of this country Had not the King of Sweden been assassinated 1, Hail nuethe keeperors Peter and Paul of Russia been assessinatee ? And was it prudent to preach up ,the doctrine, that any individual was competent to judge who ought to be assassinated and who ought not ? Before those_pere sons toldthe Spaniard that he had a right to assassi nate the Emperor of France because he invaded Spain, let them recollect how recently Great Bri tain had attacked an inoffending nation,- with whom she was not tat wars If their doctrines were whole some, let them reflea on the right which a Zealand. er, infiemed by that which he (Mr. W.) should ever term a most atrocious vielenee, walth' possess to arm himself ion their prinaiples with the poniard 01 veegeante. • Let them retied!' on treat...progress English empire in the 'East. Let them remember the march of British armies Peer the guiltiest! eoute. tries in Asia, fof the purpose of. deposing their on offending sovereigns. Surely those sovereigns hareie their Courts individuals persorrelly and warmly at taehed to them ; and were the doctrines to wit:o he alluded established, the liand of A subject of the Nebel) of Oude or Tippoo Sultaun might, wi h justice, be lifted in secret against those to whom his untortus nate sovereign owed his misfortunes. There was something, however, beyond this ti ensideration of the subject. The papers in which these doterines were asserted were published in this country in Inc French language, for the purpoie of being Osculated on the Continent, and were supposed to be so cir cot:dated, under the auspices of the British Govern ment,: for that which th 4 imagined to be a wise pc). liticral objeet. These papers accordingly went forth to the world as sanctioned by this Government. With that feeling they would be read by the person whom they declared it would be not only justifiable, but meritorious, to murder. Let' it be recollected that this person had . pre-conceived the - opinion that the British Government were tee instigators of the plot for his destruction, by means of the internal machine, Let it be recoll(Waed, that he had told the, people of France that the British Gueeminent had landed assassins on tee French coast for the pur pose of secretly destroying him. What a cooftema- Lion would such statements on his part recette from the circulation of see!) lit etrines es those recently promulgated ? What must be the necessary conse quence, but, that if this person conceived that the band of the British Government was' thus raised . against his pers on , t h at ' h e would avail himiett ever\ opportunity of retaliation ? The very indivi duals who published these papers declAred, that a person of the name of Haukwitzer had olready been sent from France, for the express purpose: of -tit- tempting the life of the Sovereign of Greet Britain. At the very moment that they became the advoeieee of assassination, they expressed their belief that Buonaparte had in his pay a bend, rile for tarty deed or blood. Were they aware of the vital danger to which they thus exposed the persons of their Siree. reign and his family ? For 'himself, having seen the doctrines to which he had alluded maintained in those publications which were generally considered as having the support of eseneuistration s nod having aa, the other bowl seta by a Noble theniartlYdlstisis a' doarines.. Mir pits in atiollt-r i We, I ra hid felt it his duty out to allow the 110. se of Coot• ,duns to separate witho ut givii; g the ot 11. o f Ho a Hun. Ge n tleman opposite, .10 opportuu ty toJk similar declaration i arid With respect to Me indir,. • deal who was the limn •diate object'of these oh ••• minable doeriees, Wai it AO be believed that Prov:. 'knee, who, for inscrutable pareoses, had raised op that extraordinary man; "lead 1, d him io .siitelY through clangers of every deicririon, who had pre. served him in the .fiitid of battle, and Who had, shielded him from the knife of the ass issio--4'34' lt to be believed 'that Providence would allow its object involved to be fr u strated by the pony etrais ot such short sighted ,beings, whose'proj •cts would be As frialloi as they were criminal ? Li;., trosted that be should bear a distitia ,disavowal of dodrittes, in which %F.lll Europe.declared, The CHANcaLoott of the EXcusauss lbat if the limo Gentlein m tilought it necessary fol. the safety of every Crowned Head io any of his Alajesty's Mitriaters,my a disavowaloithe taclied to them, publications which ' t ad been described, to ea himself from the implication of the criminality si" •liiiy hadsbeen atfOrdeit him for making soca a dii", he WaS very glad iliat avowal i but he did trust i hat thelion.Gotleoa 1.4: she wu more than necessary anxiety on cite 6Lib i e He .had no-hesitation in stating that he cok ) 0 ,. conceive the, existence of any eirciOnstances %chic': would justify the promulgation of sentimeoOr 0.'7 as had been described. He perfectly oiNe d 1/ the Hon. Gentleman, that pettiog out of the (1;: itort the divine prohibition of murder, those 0 1 '' t. were disposed to have recourse to such 0019.: hostility, Would find them injurious rather than; an opportie neficial to their cause. Were such a sYsle al 6 . 0 blished, it, would involve the world in 011111,.11 greater- than any by which it had yet been aili K4e o Ile also per(ettly a • . iwith t i . Hub, Geoileao giLei IL thats when "Providence distinctly asstnned the 41°. knell Ilan of great events, for ultimate port,oses au — d, and incomprehensible, no short-sighted hunaaleof fort could retard their p ro g ress; but this sea ton . ought to be Weil guarded, and ought not to be I )4 l f a matted to i s operation to preteut our resiotc °lsis' immediate evil . Even if it Were declared by , i d science, that the plans of Buonaparte WPa l ` l 1) ,,,06 must be ',tinnily executed, yet if they cola",i';10 carried into execution without a violation 01 , 1 ..° to watch ought to be defended, it Wa9 oor untreis. Take. an effort to defend theio, bokev er b° , 1 ' 3: ,,,1i1y Nothing cook! r.e more clatt.,,,erous than In li'l! u ' o ' ~t the truth; that alt events were wader t he do": , sli est Providence. It was in the defence of liberty, .40.,., , ,oy ennreision, that liUMAit virtue %vas inul eLl'":401 displayed i and those who perished insuch i.:.441. Cause, perished gloriously., and itOt .Nllitoilt EL.,1,0 It resistible as the courSe of Buonaparte Lit :'tali. appeared to be, if we. ittdeed thought il'Al !heist 0 dice supertioencled human' evetrop, v1°1.16 l° convinced that in that course be 0 04 •` - ' O , io , checked. This country might be chns'l a 34 t i t x strurnent of arresting his mighty nrogr''',-;:ori,' (hieing good out of ilie evil i Which bad lekl'---4 pe fisted. 'Mott was there, lie. would it4s.:,iitts to march of Buonaporte which ought to ill suppose that his ultimate StleCevi WO 0W4011,1,60 creed by Providence ? Lei tbis coontry 011.004 o wn exertions, and say whether the succ e,o s ll,;• exertions had not been as extiaordinary P t ; 1 ~ r e• Cess of the exertions of tbe enemy. il il! 1 01 0 ',dared that a superintend rig Provid‘h ed lij ", 6 od P nonce the dominion of the laud, it must . 1 ' " 4 1 1 4 ; dared that the earns superiotentliog Pr0via,0,.... given to 'Great Britain the doulite e43 el Ille, e O P The ,future presimied cht.,r;rad iii ions iii 6 1.41 ‘ be Jects for eptitemplation. Wleir ever 0 1.1 0 1 ov a result howevcr, it bec.itou ui, vit,i.r tveryooof of circuinstatices,_ to c hoose the not& e t) ot i c od and I -10110tir It) the pttr Ocular stil)jet la bo o! by thelionourable Getitlent.in. lie lo' l lit : lo gaiY , tion in repeating, that be disooved ittoltcs ioiita and from the bottom of his soul, any du 4;i9 it i t wii led to •pra.:tlii CS bo unehristrionge , u ,, 0 10 enough in say , Of thew), atid so folcii;11 ' and wanly policy. , 11 , (Jeti" Air. W litTelt HAD thanked the Right Ilm, Lilo tlenoot for on; halt and honour:J.)lo '''Jv‘''''' 4th , had l•K, would not quarrel wieh loar ne&onot oe ~,i,,0, es ti'', to that disavoy al incitemerits, to n ational it it,i 116 ' (Mr. W.) trusted that, no exilitoi°,:t' te „0 would ,pe Construed into the eil,:131:411011.11/;. 1 , ic oSt a toorfist, 0 ( [tat hei tbetight It init")°ll t ' of ladt• j the po \ver of France. He Masi h° .° 0 .1)ell 114 to c!nt , ...riairt such an opMirtir at a (1)011/11.111tuoili Ito poc(sl . of France wag iesisted more ca u l cow: 0 •-", any former period of the present ;Chartsowiti bor '' Whatever he might think of • the el lio iti iith l the nations of Euroee--whatever 01 illipfic ' 04 ,1, re' eutertain of the intentiotts of Provideoc' , „ hel lo ' bo hod oP , e spea to that extroord;nary lating 0 _ ~,3 , ot • possessed stn. h a powerful influence oYer ", o ts. but to 0 , he was hot the less conviaced of tbe , , . a I ,Ideutliog .e, :Mee to his clesigiis—•of the ditty 0 b e ilie c ui % liberties, even should ester tnilLation . ~..., I , s ter 'Pence. But it I;V,I, not for an indlvew`!'t ic, tie. 1 hood aiterel) de forward, rind with a criinitra e ver ,_.,. celeraie the regolt. SW:11 atterOpla we. berc d ow 4 well remcw - v OO wile:he of their objetl. Il• , .scoutiory J' i t rejoicitigit that were occaiiub.jill " vol. i 1 tpera , , . i . 4, news ot, the assassioairoo of (t it! . foitis t Poill' was then said ilia' Itussia vv,,Wd ttl'arat,i, flit, elo3 She ,did so turn. A most absurd cogill,'"_. 3f f o rtoo: b e tween Groat Britain and Itossio, m id wn , ~, so d hot)joglte' of ed ? l'hat Ilussi:l WaS Colll,,frielY tnec.,,tie one Ihe stieeei4or of the assasstotocil Paul the firmest friends of FrAoce. . ORS' 1311'1" L il' I NSO [NJ,: NT i DE:0 1 " . . i . 0 . nced !lief . ~. A Messahle from the Lords onnou , Cororiooo7, ships' concurrence rn the Irish 134 Coot moo!, with (h° ir ° I I.lrli, and requested it coolerence .. t oo, n ill° in the Painted Chamber, op tild ';"" , _ on s in by the Conoco .., the Amendment tn;ideCoal` InsOlvent Debtors' 11111. the '. is s :t. • fortilej that c Olt The Ale - '-'ll,rera' wer. 10 .35.... „„ . 1 , o tti c , on' 1 00 1 mons agreed t,, the conference, , ~c ,, ,„ row 1 'ul° ' ' t I beior nppoi`nted to maroge I , . . cr finch for thn t purpose, IIYP E ". , $ Mr• Secretary , .. 010 On their retorn, l• . o t wale" `, is ported, that the i.orcls,.deslre','!_,llo,l9, ha° ifto , good understaadieg wiiti the '..-'.;)isi`celf them te planted the reasoos which hid aid the 1.400 wcle r made 0 , Hi Il' if , agree front the Amr:odtVell‘ 7-.01,4 iv t he '''- i ole corornon4, by which the Prr'l ornely, i1igi,,,4,0( extended to the Isle ot Al 3ll . ' i e opr.ltl"- far to Lordsbips were no! ',twee holy . , ~ f. 1 r. :Oil L.L