The Sun. — London, England, 1814-06-21 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COUP-1 OF KING'S BENCI-I, JI:Nr. 20 RliX V., Dr. BF ItEXGE.II, .ND OTHERS. Mr. GURNEY prayed the judgment of the Court upon t ese defendants, convicted of a Conspiracy to . raise the i.riceS of the Public Funds; on the '2l t of April last, by propagating take rumours. IP The ticlendants De Burt:tiger, Lord Cochrane, BUtt, Ralph :!',andon, J. P. Ifolloway, and . Henry Lvte, appeared in Cella. The defendants A. C. Johnstone; and Alexander Macrae,' did nut,, vppea r. Mr. Serjeant BESt, for the defendant Butt only, st7id, that if the Court should not grant his mo tiOn in arrest of judgment, he should stibutit ,upon tlie reading of Lord Elleitborough's notes of the :rl4 'that a material averment of the indictment Nyas not proved. The defendants had been con victed upon all the co nuts of, the indictment, ex cept two, Viz. the first and second ; but all the counts had reference to the firsf, which averred that there was open and public W 4 r between the Allies of Great Britain and the then Ruler of Fiance. • Lord ELLENrOROUGH said, there were , too ttlany tittutns which recog - raised the war, for. 4inlg•vs to allow.their ignorance of it. Serjeatit BEST said, he had looked into the tonnes, atid found none which referred 10 the war between our Allies and France. Ile should first move an arrest of jadgment. The defendants bad all been acquitted on the first two counts of the indictment ; tid upon the t hird _count, upon which they had been convicte(t the Learned Scr jeont instructed cm the part of the defendant Butt, to make three objections in arrest of judg merit . to. this and every succeeding count. l st, That it alleged nothing which amounted to a le gal crime ; 2dly,'That if the charge did amount to . a crime, , the persons to be effected by it were not pariicul9,riied ; and 3tily, That the ohject of the offen-ce t'as stated to be to raise the Fonds of Ibis kingdom„ referring to a previous desctiption of the united kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, there being now no kingdom of England. The Funds in question are English only ; and, there fore, the indictment ought to have said, "of that pa'rt of the united kingdoM of Great Britain .and Ireland called England." .As.to the first objection, " he said there was nit adjudged case in conspiracy which laid down, as an abstract proposition, that to raise the price orate publie funds is 'a crime : and it that be not A ierinie, tb-en a conspiracy to - do so is not a crime, luta:smile() as the offence is not a crime by itself. It is thereftireneeessary, in all indictineot for a conspiracy to raise the price of the Funds, te - state criminal . ciicnrustaoces which may give' it the copplexion .of a criafe.; and without : some side object: is 'alleged, i; is no crime at all per se"; 4.: so far frbm being- a crime, the Itigher the Funds , ire.• kent,":: the "better for Government and for the public. To Take, the Funds may he iu nocent—it may be meritorious---or it may be erOainal; hot, per se, it is neither ; and itis neces sary to put the circonistanerc'ev.hielt give,it • a cri— minal complexion upon the record.,The indictment does not . state Ufa' Ilie - ilefera'ints were possessed `of , any part of the finds, and meditated'a fraud to order to sell them to undue athantage. The Learned Serjeant could conceive cases of public mischief from the rasing of the funds—as, for in stence, if they were to be raised on the day on which the Commissioners 'for the. reduction of the national debt were to make their porchases ; but , that was the only way .in which the public could be injured. In such a case, it would be enough to state the object of the consp iracy to produce: that-public injury ; but here a l it that was stated was that the defendants combined to raise the fends on a perticular day. The Serjeant therefore contended, that this 'vas not an indictable offence ; and - that none of . the distinctions in the books as to conspiracy reached this particular' case. None carried it further than that though the means were . la‘vfol, if the end were unlawfal, that was conspiracy. ' The early eases had . been since confined by the Stat. 21-Ed. 1.; bin al though the modern "decision S came nearly to the present case, none reached it. He cited Rex v. relwards, 8 Mod. 320, for the proposition he had je ;t laid down ; but contended that here the end vas not unlawful. He also cited Rex. v. Starley, 1 -..;e.i. 174, which was an information for .a con-, spiracy to Stipp Fes s time gallon trade, and to cause the pr.;or to mutiny against the farmers of the ex &f-;e. The defendants, were acquitted of all but ie.poveristiing the fartwrs of the excise. Now, it was no offence to impoverish another - with intent to enrich one's. self; but it was adjudg ed, that the yerdict related to the information, which recited the excise as •part of the reve tune ; • and it was held - , that - impoveriehing the farmers of the revenue rendered theM less able to pay the King's duties. 'Unless, therefore, - am. 6ssery connexion had been established by. the record it was presumable, that the lodgment in 6.1 rase would -have been "different. It ~,was not .adjudged against, the defendants, because . their obje l et was to impoverish the ' farmers of the excise ; , but by spewing those fat:mars_ of 'the excise 'thus less able to pay - time Go-- vernment. ,It was for the injury to Govei-n -meta they were convicted.• He further cited Rex v. 'Pest, Salk. '174, in which it was held, - that se veral. persons might-tawful , ly melt and cousu i lt to prosecute one .who was guilty ;" otherwise, to charge one was innocent, tight Or Wrong. The Lee rued Serjeant Contended:, that: the' offence must be mischievous to the public,utilLss it were alleged, and proved, that the defendants had ma- Lee against the individual., .He was aware tfrat it was , sten ell- that this offence was 'mischievous to certain iedividtialS'e but they were' not named, and chat hrought him to, his second obkctioo. Lord ELLO7I 10110 t Cii : , 7—ls, it possible to state, that tile - defeiOnts intended to injure person Woriinutekno\slerg•Who :night ,be injured ) - Mr. Serle.ghEST siid, that it was Proved at the7t-rial, eko; Mr. S!eers,-;ae broker for the Ac eountmintita;eu,;r:ll (Yf i tii tl Court of Chancery, made p itee e ase i t .it e e - +l,y"! 'lf it had been statedewit)t a* t . ..v..tim i . 'Lee hiei,---- I; -.. Lord ik, i LEN;:lotpuG,Ef. 7 = 7 That could not,bc, un- Its:', - the r iVeoutitant"-Gleneral be ordered by the ,• • e . .. Conrt. to purchase ; for ctl'iaili individuals *On a given day, which I do not believe he is. Mr. Serjeant iii:7•r.--Ile is ordered to buy to the credit of a particular suit.• Mt. LE BLAII4C —Von contend, that it &aid have been stated, "thereby to injure A - , B, C, and B, whO were to purchase o❑ a particular (lay." . Mr. Serjeant BEST said, they might know •of certain persons whb were to purchase on a parti cular day, and contended, that it was not the dif ficulty of bringing the defendants within the of fence conspiracy, which answered his argument. Lord Ikt.ENeoftotlon. -=But impossibility is `solne objection, both in law and in fact. Mr. Serjeant BEsTsaid, that by suffering this,form of indictment to stand, the Court night be Support ing the future prosecution of one gambler against (mother. Ala bona tide holder of Stock had been injured by ,this offence, there could be no diffi culty in saying that he was obliged to buy on the very day. in question. If the defendants meditated mischief against all, tlfey Meditated against tiny ; and this was putting it in the strongest way to support the prosecution ; for if they did not medi tate against ull the public, upon this indictment, it was no offence at all. The Seri r eant contended, that the natures of those - any should have been par tienlarized: Jusftce BAYr.ux.—Suppose the intiictment bad alleged, •` by reason whereof . , A, li , C, and and who were obliged to hecOtne purchasers on that day, tvpre form' to pay larger snius•than they otherwiNe wouLl have done. Lord ELLEN3ottouGu---That would. be to con tend tlrat consequential damage made the:crime; which it does not. The crime is psrfeet by, the cm:piracy.. t'.;rjeant BEST agreed thfit the crime con sisted in the -intention, hut contended that the intention was too generally stated. DANIPtck.--=-1f the .indictment went far ther, it tecuici allege conseqnctitial damage ; and 'it is not necessary that damage should f4ll to any individual. it is impossible to name 'ill the pub lic, and it is equal impossible to name ir/int, for it-was not knvwn who would be injured. 111 r. J. LE .BLANC.--Suppose' no one had pur chased on. that day, it would not have prevented the crime. It is the same oifenCe as that of rais ing the price of. provisions on a market-day, which is not less an (dunce because the price was so high that nobody would purchase on that day. Lord ELLENDOROUGII.—ThIS is• one of those cases where the charge is multitudinous; such as barratry, where it has been held you need not specify the persons. _ _ Mr. SCrie:lllt BEST.----There is only that oGnce, and that of being a common scold, in which your Lordship's doctrine, Lord ELLENBottouGn.--There are more. I re member in a case Of deterrence from going on - a public road, it was held that the necessity formed the exception. . _ Mr. Serjeaut excuse should then he stated, as where an unk.r.iwii iierson is robbed or ed, indietnieut states tiini to lie un kizbat. Loyd ELLis-sottouG - .ti.--:Nature :and reason niake hcs excuse, if it he 'utc* , olry .suite body ; but it is nut : it is rite ' tendency x' •. conspiracy which As the crirne. Suppose nobody had gone to the Stoek,,lPx.change that day from apprehension of pestikuce or war, would that have negatived the critne ? Mr. Seijeant BEST lastly cited the case of Rex v. Roe, 2 Stra. 999, which was not of conspiracy, but against der!: of the nizakctS for exactions, ,in which it %vas held that the iodic( went ought to specify the persons. Lora EL.I4.:NB(?Rp,LJGI3.---There it is the doing of the act_ that is the caence. BET then relied upon his third ohleetion, and said, that the defendant's inten tion %vas coblmed t 4 the faints of this kingdom. Now there are no such general funds as 'are spoken of ,in all these courts t Lord ..?ALLAN BOROUGIr.—iII a large sense, the Trish funds are part of the fuiu of this kingdom. 'They arc, I believe, saleable in the market of this kingdom and they-are part of the Ways and iis.tleads of it. Each is part of the whole revenue `of the stocks and funds of the United Kingdom. It could not have been correctly called otherwise. Mr. PARK, for the defendant De BereOgCr only, would not urge the two former obiections, but submitted that there was st%me weight in the last. In the indictment, his Majesty is called, as he is directed to be by the Ist article of the Act of Union, 39 and 40 Geo. Ill." of the United King dom of Great Britain and Ireland, King;" and the 7th article of that Act provides, that the Irish and English Funds shall be kept separate and dis tinct. Now the offence in question is charged to relate only to the Funds of the. United Kiogdom, and there are no such Funds. Mr. J. DAMPIER.—If it referred to a fund, which by 'my could not exist, the objection woula be good ; but there is a sense in w:aich .Lay exist. LORD EI,LENBORODGEI.— . -The Funds of the kingdom are of the United Kingdom, which is the name . applied to the new state of society how ever- they nifty be apvlied to the different purposes offhe two .kingdoms. Mr. .PARK then left the case upon tbe objection by analogy to the Russia; case, : in which it :%vas held an Order in Connell could not be titkep judi cial notice of, without being put in evidence. Ile added, that the intLe.tment :alleged the rumours to be false, of which do proof‘i , as given at the tt ial. LOUD BLLENROIZOU4/I—bllt tilere was proof of the fabrication of the rtnnours, independently of that 'fact., Mr. Segeant PELL, for the defendants Sandotn, Holloway, and Lyte, wade no !notion in arrest of ,judgment. Lord CodEIRANp then said,' he was desirinis of an opportunity of explaining the eirennotances under which he stood neiOre the Court. Lord Er.a.N.no'Rovon said, he would have that opportunity hereafter. He could not speak now unless in arrest of indgme.ut, Lord CoeI:RANE sand, he did .not intend to move in arrest of judgment. Lord ELLENBOROU GU then gave judgment on the motion in arrest of judgment, for %vbich 11 was per . fectl dell'. there' was no ground. The in dictment charged a public mischief by exeitthif false rumours, in order to raise the price cat pub lic securities. The offence was complete in the concert and . combination, even if the purpose should not be effected by circtimstanees. 'the purpose was to strike at a vendible article . , like prOvisions, and was a Meditated fraud or. , arl those Who bad to do with that article on the It was unnecessary to specify whorit. Withemt 'a spirit of propliky,, it was impossible to do Sol and it so-, the ..iinposSibility was an ekctise : Hit had been possible, the ulultitudinou,sness was an excuse. Air. - J. .1, 7 r f3tANC.-If the price of the Fluids 'had been attempted to be raised innocently, it *wild be no offence but to conspire to rase them by sprea'di4; false rumours, was clearly an Offence; and the offence was general as-to thosa who should become purchasers. Mr. Justice . BAYLEY bad no doubt that this was. an offence, by illegal means, and with an illegal view and.if to injure a class of'indiwiduals, it was enough. The criminality depended. on the act, and not the consequences of that act. The funds in question became the funds cif the United Kingdom : they were raised and appropriated. by the legislature of the United Kingdom. The Ent:- rish and Irish funds constituted the funds of the United' K ingdom. Mr. J. DAmytEa had no doubt the conspiracy was complete. 1. There need be none defrauded. :'.,lt was iiepossihle to say who'would be. '3. To say that the im'eictifient not being preferred till afterwards, the-injured parties might he named, was to say that consequential damage was neces sary, wilich it was not. . He thunght the funds were bett-er so:described than in any cnher way. Lord ELLENnottot:G}l Shed read lips notes of the tria4. • Lord ELLE.szawtoif.Gtt having finished the evi dence, and stated the verdict of the Jury,. the de fendants were called upon for„anv i'en±:rrics they might have to make in mitigation of punish ment. , . Lord CotnttANF. said, as it was his wish to de tain the•-Court - as little as possible, he had drums up what he had to offer in writing, and jut in the shortest compass-. his Lordship then read from his paper, that his knowledge of De Berenger was slight, and totally unconnected with, stock af fairs J that of course he had such intimacy with :Mr. C. Johnstone as their relationship required ; amid that he,knew Mr.-Butt, as his regular agent in transactions which he hail never conceived to be dishonourable. Of the other four persons be knew nothing. .IVhether, therefore, they were -or were not guilty, he was no way concerned in what affected them. His life had been too often in jeopardy for him to feel any anxiety about it; but his honour had hitherto been untomeimed, and he only wished to live s.to remove trout himself a weight of dishonotir which NC•46 almost beyond his endurance. His Lordship then proceeded to com ment on the evidence : he explained the circum stance 0.1 his leaving King's shop on account .of the expectation of hearing Tin account from his brother, who was ill in Spain : he urged the im probability of his disclosing the name of 11e Be renger, if he had born an accoihplice, since this was to afford the only clue for detecting the traus action. As to the differenet of swearing respect ing te-^64041---of-ik..ik t # it was pos_ : .„ silk that he might have cimuged his coat is his Way.:to Greeq-street, and alsO have taken off Ks• stars, and other insignia : his Marini; with hini.a porbnanteau itultlied, Fst Icasta possibily of his having so acted. Dc Berenger might. be afraid to. appear before him.ift, his assumed dress, as he was afterwards unwilling to go to Lord Yarmouth in. his real uniform,- hectome such a. circumstance would be exceedingl:, unusual. lire concluded by saying that he l e ad. often op , a vortuttity of sheiring his character. This was Jim tint time, thank mi, that it had been called i t question and he hoped.t hat if not now, he shm:ld spo-dily he clear, ed frow all guilt in the estimation of the public. Ile then put- in his affidavits. The first was one of his own xuaking, in which he re-stated that the assertions in .his former affidavit were true, and urged that his trial bad beef; materially INS fictive from the absence of au important winless who was compelled to go to sea, and also by time *lateness' of the hour at which his Counsel, fatigued amlexh.austed,were called upon for the defence: He next - offered an affidavit of his servant; Thomas Dorman; but Lord ELLEssonouon ob served, that it could not be heard : that the de ponent liad been a witness on trial, and had then an opportunity of saying all that was neces sary : he could not now he heard either in coatra dictien of that testimony, or beyond it. Lord Cochrane then- put in the affidavits of some persons who were on the trial, but not called. •Mr. GURNEY stated, that there laa - d been an op portunitya calling them, it the Counsel for the defence had thought it discreet. - Mr. Justice Le 13r,ANc said, it was clear that the Affidavits of persousso situated could not be heard. The aiiidavit 1d the Linn. William Erskine Co! chrane was then read : it stated that the deponent had been dangerously ill in January and February last. To this was added the certificate of the Sur geon describing' the complaint. Lord ELLENROROVGII said, that his Lordship should have been prepared to verify when he •re ceived these documents, and by what conveyance. Mr. Butt was then called upon, and begged in dulgence to read a paper, in which he- expressed a wish for a new rifid distinct .trial, confident that Nviratcver might be the guilt of the other• persons, he should then receive a separate acquittal. -As to Flolloway and his party he knew nothing of them. Mr. PARK. then pot in an affidavit for De Be renget; in which the deponent *fated, that he had served. the country for many years, as a volunteer without fee or reward ; ,that his fathi. • was -an American Loyalist, and had spent a pati•iinonihl fortune in the service of this Covntry ; that he had, suffered muck by•his,imprisonment under,the Alien Act,. which bad prevented him from proper Com-. munication wit h his advisers. • Mr. PARK followed, and trusted that cumstanees_ here suited would have their due. weight with the Court, and that They would take into their consideration the great expense to which the delembint had been snhiected. . RIC.IiA.RPSoN tohowei on the same-side, anti hoped that the imprioninent a)re:-.ldy_t i torgred, by De Berenger, thoug,li arising from anutheE ,t Cause, yet be co / Abidered tcr as to opt rAte in toitigatint , Mr. St:tjeant - l'Et,t. (and IWO (Idler yoke in behalf of Ho Lvte, 11) ' I S9'' )tot 4 tie maintained, as on the' trial. that I were Connected w tii no direct liroof,l,o ttti r lie iorne "striking c'nitleidences. . 01 had - I . :Jade some tittonetneat 1:v vt)l'"'" r Y f i in ) t r ,, c te ,, lession,' and a qt.; i (Sancloat): had iltsL - t ot on the 'trial not to deny iris . iill7 this wOuld operate to apportionment. 01 t nient not 50 heavy as those m i , rbt ill°'ls3 deserve who had made no conlessitin. t -r:ry GtIINF.I7 Said, :flat (11 1 tions had been mode on th e ratan- 11. 1;0 defendants. It 'as true, that . conspirocY; 4.17, "..misery, acquaints a man with strung!: ttllbt--cle-ift'f lows." 14e vas willing, hnwever, to that the guilt of Holloway and Lvte 1 1.35 what'repaii•edby their . ccinirition; tiioug ! ' ; re" not say a of' Sandom. De 13ei - e.nlzer higher in guilt ; he was the hks'ml and he had •also •attempted to escape, N'the rei ; . „os , would have screened'himself and his con i n Ll !' 1; • His guilt, and the guilt of the three Pri t ';-' - foci; had been aggravated by. the falsest met" the trial, at the trial, And to-dAi% r:;:at seemed to have acted on the prestmption' they. had the hardihood to swear, they 3‘ 1 12c , easily find the credulity to believe tbe n ,, /• ; 'Ate" letters to Tahourdin were perhaps fj,.': - ,11 ,04 lately, to help the defence, or they • toig",0 11 ' 1 ; been written at the time purported it cu rl A ll ~i lion of such a trial. The affidavits as to t`l-roov` presumed to contradict the 'evidence 'of Of witnesses, who had i:fertifted De liere lle ia perhaps the completest manner ever court. Their Lordships would then CO immense stock-accimut of the IhriT Pr iu :jirti t ; and that their ruin must have ensued blot sudden rise. Ilis Learned Friend, Mr. 5 ` rtt ly Best, had, in his address to the Jury, el ° ‘', ll' s (P insisted on the high character and 'se rv.; ; c eio' , Lord Cochrane. They had, indeed, 1 -w,..0 : . meritorious, but. they had been highly re" i liec li , his rank in the navy was -advanced - , he it ° pm. - honoured with a great personal distinczi°%flie his Sovereign, airs) he was elected itlesub ec great City of Westminster situation t r; a td while it authorised his Lordship to be attenti;ooc the conduct of others, made it doubly in l Po 3 i t that he should be as vigilant as to his ow n '- 0 0 4 , return had he made for these -honours ? lii3 backed by falsehood and moral perjttJY' • 00' fence was not the ebullition of you:Idol it did not.spring front excessive ireneros il Y # lo 4 over r ardent spicit,, it was 'a b cold, crime, mixed up with ,meditated• meannef'ioolie' prosecutors in th's arduous business lrlic l ,t only for instice, and that they . would find hands of the Court. The Court deliberated for some time, a 011 ordered the d - efendants to he co mmitt 6 i lg o.' brought-up for judgment to- morro w uto rlP SATURDAY'S GA 7, ETTE,--(Contirnie --- "'"ed----- 1e . .. . DIVIDENDS. . T l g litc" ) . o Is ' July 19. J. Beckett, late of Aoc ldroonintrn "'' ,iii'f 0' July .2.6.• T. !!.•lhept.P-rd, !ate of Great. Marv-le-bu' r , w ‘ttP;;o‘„ 4 : . n'en-.draper--July S.a. C. .1 - looper, Throgrnort n ''.,;il o , d ' ~ o''',c s o y,- oce. b rolier—Ju iv 2. T. Chapnrin, Lit.ilel,nr;i4, ''','• , l"': menittiari—ln'l'lB. i‘'. StartAea 7 s•eatf , .. N',ol .fl'e l " ite-'' .1„.10, .• l .. r o A , scrirener—July ti. H. Proetoiand T. c,mtri 11/„ 'l l° oo' fordshire, groeert-r-Ji.:y 1. J. 'A etun and i n . ' (i", vili: Kingston-tipon-.Hull, tinther-rnercliants-....J01v '' , . 4 ',..1 1 ;i0, - wri, 134s , ingt on, Derbyshire, cornfactor-- 713 Y 0 7. 1 0e.; p1 , a t 'l'. Fre: - ;er, and T. Ilaylstrin, late of Nichola3-W t- ittlY 13.11'' . —July 11. D. Holt, Le: , :dert, Eqscx, niitler.""it.-itA , t ,;(',' Coolie, Penciiilr eit-i.zr ref ,A;tatiolick—.Tttly 113; '' • ~,iii;`,,,,os ci . . i•tationer—Juiv 28. A. i. , :rilsni, ,Nlitre-earift) 0 - . o ''',;l'''',.. toerchant--..T01v 9. E.:Mak-torn ; kV a t line;--strez 4 ,",,,„ev i ; ' ,l. '' 1 ,,,,,,--J aly 9. i• ; ... Wright,' Watling-- , :freti vs -nrc o ;, i )-1 ,, „, r ,, P Gv,rniesqn,Loathard-street, w . ,,teh-hr .ker--- ,101 1 1 '',;, 014- %t a , e 1 - 14 it., Wood-street, Chearid,, ‘‘,•,. f. t .', 1 ,,,,,,u.••••7" - ;,,,i. .tif flt Willnictt-sqnat e, dealre--litiv Si. J. Amick, ( '''''',lor%',ll l ": . perfnmer—June i 5. H. Iliggitisoit, FinshoTi,,; ' ,lo, 4•- .Yi":, c!,!:::1:—.1n , y 2g. J. Parry, Qa.Lilit;•.-e.iort, --'''s'r, ,P i e l,ol" - f scrivener—lane •'n. It. C,elier, W. Ciodfre Is ll 'fate ii grace, ClieapsiSh:', lace;aeii—jane , 721'. J. ii , ,.:' 0 311r court, Lonthhury, vittualler--July l'i. 1 1 ;- ''''' Hereford, liep-uterchant. • ' .iii" 1.-,lg. - j. • CER,TIFICATF_S- . —Jc r,v 9. t o '', ; yin; J. Tote, Crooked-lane, • merchant—lt Cn' t ::e.ro: - go': Devonshire, hotelter—:\. Chester, -1 01 `.1 il --- 1%e6 1 ' ) :,, ' 1.1. •' iii c re, Crewl , . erne; Somersets hi re, rry'r c l= j u o, '', i , 4 ,, e',$ Red wardine,.Wot c..'-st ershire, nialster—S. V'''',,,•t-r ° i:tlo„',... I)trhyshire, chandler—G. Hill-, Tottei - 41:00 -e , ° ..p.i.io , '.„., " net-soaker—M.Millett, Chepstow, Moninotit''.loLoP-: W. Wescotn, Exeter, shopkeeper—S. Watson , vonshire, inaltster. 0 c i . - stio s, On the ith inst. at ke l l 3 st i o li n .l2 l l- House, LadY 14-3:1.-330,.g1,,411pi; soh. , Ol --, ~0, ~ The Lady of Colonel Horner,lrf Mel , • bark' , in bei'°' 1 6 1g " On the Mil:June, at Dalton-Honse, Nort du Fergtirson, of a sou ; ti` / „ s on, f'sq. On the 15th• inst. the Lady ofJolu; Steve r , .. e r. et, Russell-street, Blonmsbury-sqtrare,•of a (lonl-',, i ' r i e ,str c ~,0 On the 16th inst. at his house in . 41.1he" i ` of Willi' f Lady of Robert Keats, Esq. of a son. Ort Friday la-1„ in Fitz' ov-square, the 14ailY - iX ' the '' Haslewood, Esq. of a daughter. l a ce, On Saturday last, at the Pavilion, Hans-lo to ' Sir G. W. Denys, Bart. M. P. of a d air gliter- . ca rt , 7 4 , AIAILRIED, ,I . ,iiis , of 0 ,0) " At Glatunire Church, Joseph King Cun t ,A o sol ' a l Charlotte, eldest daughter of Lieutenant.'" :': 5 41. 90' • • e t t, „I' k of the Royal Bengal Artillery. y , a lirar_.",., a ft? .011 the lath inst. at Edinburgh, 'J c t. D f . St - • lenttuty, to Mary, second daughter ' nearn. , d i ...—.------------- , tit /I DIED. Scotl` l , a ij r s. or' On the Gth inst. at Killorn, near KiPPT; e d 80 'f.'.' il , s oo Fogo, Esq. late of the Island of Jamaica, 9t-• Lady v ja b! (,)ti the 711 i -inst. at Costleeraig, S co tian d ' ,isly r e' ic a t . e' 08 michael. .0n Sttrular se'nuight, in Patrick Wi ll'. Latham, Esq. M.D. son. of the late Jul " .. rifr' d Meldrunt, in the County of l'ipperolY - .. ca dillf, 14 1 . r,nl ,jt On Thnrsdar last, at his house ill l''" ore' i a ostuond, Corn-dealer and Seedsatan. r ., . I ., a n , c o g. _, 86, Henry Dav:kins, Esq. of Standlyilc" WO On. Sunday evening - , at his libtrs-e in ',°..: i ri , th e of -street' ~,0 A .,, a , to ° o' 4 Wilts. vero-- ~, veo ; In:February last, on his• way fron t ' f to , , '- r e, IP- Jain Sarnpson Godfrey, of the. ltoyals. ___, aec 0 ii t . , , i ,.11_ 0 , On Tuesdny last, at the very nth's fle : :' o ,, a r !' , ' , ,A •O' r ef., i i Rev. John nedwell, }lector of' 0 ,1,31. ".." be „, : iice , 5 pri , llll t r i / Was instituted in the year 1743 't° th l i foAl . Y sar f it• .• 05,11 e °ottani ly - resided, and, till within the 00.1,..; ocoro!.101;.01 laxly and edriscientiously performed cii a n( 1 1, 7, be' I t . very titre of his death Ins app 1 eljen erfee t, t f ~, , laW:ere . ii i i Lilted hirn ; and - his sight 5 , 51 1 so" P h e lo °- ''10 ,11) , e I ' l stnallest print or writing withoitt • the 4,. . 6i „ 3 0 7 _ o w , remains of this venerable ant: ext. r . ., ; 06 , c uO ..,-"" 4 , parishiatiers. :_.........---- on ► fo r ' tende'd to tbe'grave by his farbily, el'-' 4 , j......... < 10.. 5 .—f.—.-- -1,)G. 5 1 .1 ate' .r. ,--) TIIGH _WATER. AT LONDON 1 11 ° ::;;,112 1 '‘ ......- 0 le . :Moriking, .33 tunnt.es afror 5. 1 F. , v° ll " , ,r ol , f ; ---. O ' Il "* ' .:_-74!-7"e--"'=!! '7_r___....2 --''''..f...*-=..: _----- •.-------- ...., ,TA I It: :s°' oi fol. Lt /ND iP ON rinted liy J. o. cAr . , ~ciliiic ri s ~00., burbti,,, , ,, ; aril polilished :,y - X-„f_ . . , '„,1,, . 0 , 0 • at the S,rs-OFrica. NO.. I 1 - '2. , "',. ‘ „ , w asi• Yuccas, Ciders, Letters ',:post-p 144 ).P . '" •