The Sun. — London, England, 1822-05-03 00:00:00

THE LONDON JOURNALS. rATRACTS F 110 7 ,1 VIE DAILY MORNING PAPERS, May 3, 1822. [THE TIMES] Ministers, it will be seen, were again left in a minority last night, on the subject of the two Postmasters. It appears to us to be more dis graceful to them, in a moral point of view, to have attempted such an injustice as the retention of two Postmasters-General, in the present state of the country, than, in a political one, to be de feated is the attempt. [NEW TIMES.] The money market became exceedingly ani mated yesterday, as soon as it was ascertained tha the Bank Proprietors had decided favourably upon the intended new Banking regulations. Consols, which had remained fluctuating between and 3, rose to 79; and at the close of the market there were strong buyers at 791,- for the Account. Thus it is that the cautious and de liberate manner in which Ministers adapt their measures to the emergencies of the country, finds its best approbation in the beneficial effect pro duced on public credit and the national resources; -while, on the other hand, their political opponents are driven successively to condemn all the prin ciples which they have maintained on these sub jects. A little while ago, many of them were loud in their clamour to sacrifice the Sinking Fund to the urgent necessities of the country. — Now, the very same individuals cry out against the proposed measure, as an infraction of the Sinking Fund ! But lately, they said the salva tion of the country depended on a reduction of taxes ; now that a plan for such reduction is introduced, they are equally eloquent on the injustice of relieving ourselves at the ex pense of posterity. Another set of objectors are shocked at the inconsistency of keeping up a Sinking Fund to pay off debt, and creating annuities for forty-five years, to bear the hardest upon the most distant part of that period. Now in this proceeding there is no inconsistency at all. It is conceded that the Sinking Fund operates beneficially on the Funded Debt. Indeed, had it not been for this institu tion, it would have been impossible to reduce the Five per Cents. to Four. Thus far, then, the Sinking Fund is beneficial, and ought to be maintained ; but here is another part of our ex penditure on which that Fund never was intend ed to operate. Why should we not avail our selves of the means of reducing that part of our expenditure for the present ? It is said this might be done more directly by applying the Sinking Fund to such a purpose. But by so doing, we should lose the beneficial operation of the Sink ing Fund on the Funded Debt, not only as to eventual diminution, but what is of still more consequence, as to the continued maintenance and support of public credit. [MORNING POST.] We are happy to find that the state of the suf fering.peasantry in Ireland is at length arresting general attention, and we trust a public meeting , will immediately be held for the purpose of rais ing such a subscription as may afford ample and speedy relief. The Lord Mayor of Dublin is about to convene a meeting for this laudable purpose ; and the Lord Mayor of London has been written to upon the same humane and ur gent occasion. Theirish.Papers received yester day contain some appeals to Government and the upper classes of. Society in behalf of our wretched fellow-creatures, now become the prey of pesti lence and famine; but it is chiefly in this coun try the voice can reach the affluent of our Irish brethren, and we are persuaded they will prove themselves duly alive to the heart piercing call of suffering humanity. [BRITISH PRESS. 3 Lord Normanby repeated his motion last night, in the House of Commons, for the abolition of ene of the Postmasters-General of England. It will be recollected that the Noble Lord's former motion on the same subject was refused by a ma jority so very inconsiderable that the Ministers, if they had any respect for the dignity of the Crown, and the real opinion of the House of Commons, ought not to have permitted the question to be again agitated. Their unwil lingness to accede to the wishes of the House and of the Country they last night attempted to excuse, by stating, that an inquiry had been in stituted into the duties of the office, and they therefore prayed the House to suspend its opi nion upon the subject until the result of this investigation should be ascertained. It was, however, well observed by Mr. Bankes, who argued in favour of the motion, that this inquiry had reference solely to the details of the office, and did not in any degree affect the principle of the proposed abolition of one of the Postmasters, upon which Parliament was fully competent to determine. Mr. Stuart Wortley, who voted against the abolition on the former occasion, declared his intention last night of sup porting the proposition. The discussion was continued until after eleven o'clock, when upon a division the Ministers were left in a minority of fifteen. The' numbers for/ the motion were 2.16; against it WI. This is the most serious defeat sustained by the present Ministers since the rejection of the scheme for continuing the property tax. [HORNING HERALD.] We have given extracts from three different sets of Resolutions, emanating from three distinct sources, relative to the state of agriculture.— The first from Lord Londonderry, the organ of the Administration, the second from Mr. Huskisson, who stands in the anomalous situation of a servant of the Crown, differing from his col leagues, or his directors ; the third from Mr. Ricardo, who is both a theorist on the subject of political economy and a man of business. Mr. Huskisson's situation is by far the most peculiar, and we have looked the more closely to the Re solutions that emanate from him. His second Resolution caused us some surprise. In it he states that - the importation of Wheat 'into .the port of London was, in' 1819 -* - 300,416 quarters. 1820 - - - - 399,009 1821 - - 494,828 Now, let it be observed, that this is merely a statement of the supply, which says not a word of the sale or demand. It is possible that the whole quantity brought into the market was sold, and even consumed—and, for argument sake, let it be admitted that such was the fact. Here the demand, if even the article had been merely sold, and not consumed, would equal the supply. All data in matters of arithmetical calculation on both sides (we will say, to make the thing more familiar, on the debtor and creditor side) should be plainly stated, otherwise it is impossible to have a just inference. [MORNING CHRONICLE.] The subject of the Postmasters-General was again brought forward last night , by Lord Nor manby ; and the motion was carried by a majo rity 0f.15 in a very full House. The sum gained by this vote may be thought very small; but it should be borne in mind, that every gain of this description is also a loss to, the enemy. Besides, a wholesome precedent has been set. So far from being a motive of relaxation, this success ought to be a motive for farther exer tion. The field, God knows, is abundant enough. There can be no want of abuses of every descrip tion under a Government carried on upon a prin ciple of corrupt influence. The Country Gentle men, too, are evidently somewhat more in the humour for economy than they were a few days ago ; arid as they act more on humour than on principle, the favourable moment ought not to be allowed to pass by without being turned to account. It is very easy to perceive how much the great landlords think themselves objects for national sympathy and commiseration, from the circum stance of their always most generously speaking. of the distress as if alone affecting the farmer, .and meekly concealing their own griefs from the public eye. The language invariably is, the farmer is ruined, he cannot pay his rents. Which means to say a most lamentable, unlooked for,and deplorable crisis has arrived—l cannot get my rents ; the world's at an end ! as the spider exclaimed when its cobweb was suddenly swept away. The truth is, that for the most part these gentry dare not talk of their own distress, they cannot indulge in the consoling privilege of! the valetudinarian, expatiating on their own sufferings; for did they so, some coarse allusion might be made to the shameful, profligate, and debauched courses that have brought on their afflictions. The honest and simple name of the poor farmer is, therefore, made the scape-goat ; to use the vulgar phrase, they give one word to him and two for themselves. The over-driven animal has fallen down foundered, and the brutal driver calls out—help, good people, in the name of humanity !—(lbid.) DUEL IN HIGH LIFE. The higher circles at the West End of the Town were thrown into an unusual bustle yes terday, in consequence of a duel having taken place, in the course of the morning, between the Dukes of BEDFORD and BUCKINGHAM• The affair is said to have originated in the following obser vations delivered by the Duke of BEDFORD, at the late County of Bedford Meeting,-on the sub ject of Agricultural Distress : " He would now advert to another transaction, which he was almost ashamed to mention—he alluded to a great borough proprietor, now a Noble Duke, late a Noble Marquis, whose services, and the services of whose adherents in Parliament, had been purchased by Government—had been purchased by c3nferring high offices on those adherents. It was an odious task to mention these circumstances, but he introduced them for the purpose of asking whether, if a Reform had been effected in Parliament, such transactions could possibly hap pen ? The Noble Duke's family and connections were, of course, sent back to their constituents, when they accepted of place ; because, by the Act of Parliament, it was provided, that when a Member of the House of Commons took an office under Government, he must return to his constituents to know whether they would or would not re-elect him. But how were the individuals in question sent back ? They were not sent back to the people of England—they were not sent back to those who were free to choose or to reject them :—no ; they were sent back to the borough-proprietor—to their own patron, to the person who had engaged in the corrupt traffic—who had) in fact, made the bargain with Ministers. He would again ask, could such a circumstance possibly occur, if a Reform were effected in the Commons House of Parliament ?" It seems that the Duke of BUCKINGHAM took umbrage at these observations, and personally demanded that his Grace of Bedford should re tract them as publicly as they had been promul gated. The Noble Duke peremptorily refused to accede to this demand, and a challenge was the consequence. At half-past seven o'clock yesterday morning the Duke of BEDFORD left his house in St. James's-square, in a private car riage, accompanied by Lord LYNEDOCK, and drove directly to Kensington Gardens, where the Duke of BUCKINGHAM arrived about the same time, at a retired spot previously agreed upon, and attended by Sir WATKIN WILLIAMS WYNN. A chirurgical professor of eminence, it is said, was also in attend ance upon either party. The ground was measured by the seconds at twelve paces, and, on a signal given, the parties presented, but the Duke of BUCKINGHAM only fired ; and his shot not taking effect, the Duke of BED FORD instantly discharged his pistol in the air, upon which the Duke of BUCKINGHAM advanced towards his Grace and said, " My Lord Duke, your Grace is the last man in existence I would wish to quarrel with ; but you must be well aware that the life of a public man is not worth preserving, unless it be preserved with honour." Whereupon the Duke of BEDFORD promptly re plied, that upon his honour he meant no per sonal offence to the Duke of BUCKINGHAM in the words he had used ; nor did he mean to impute to him, personally, any bad or corrupt motives whatever. 'Their Lordships then shook hands, and the whole business was terminated most satisfactorily. THE RIGHT HON. F. J. ROBINSON, M.P. PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE, &c. &C. &c. 22, Birchin-lane, April 20, 1822. SIR—To the matter of the inclosed (not to its composition) I respectfully beg permission to call your particular attention, and also to state that in perusing the Bill for regulating the trade be tween his MAJESTY'S possessions in America and the West Indies, which was printed on the 2d nst., it is with regret I observe that in oppo- sition to practical truth you appear to believe that British vessels (although they cost, in building and navigating, 50 per cent. more than the ships of several foreign Nations) can be built and na vigated as cheap as foreign ships, and although our owners have, on their capital, in lieu of their income, been sailing their ships during the last three or four years, still a reference to the num ber of American ships entered inwards, compared with British from the United States, since your famous treaty with that nation, as well as many other similar instances ought (independently of common sense) to convince you of your error. You appear to think that when foreign nations put English ships in their ports on the same foot ing with their own shipping, England, in equity, is bound to do the like by their shipping, and that we are then sailing our respective ships on an equality of terms. Now let us take up this question in all its bearings, and we shall find that there is not a ship built in England but what, in the course of its construction (like corn in its production) con tributes to the State directly and indirectly one half or more of what she sells for when so built, and that afterwards she contributes directly and indirectly to the State one half or more (very often the whole) of her earnings, while a foreign ship , in building, &c. &c., may not pay to her State one-tenth as much. Now, when the English ship is displaced by foreigners, some other Bri tish Interests must pay to the State that which she previously paid. This proves that British shipping is of great value to the State, and ought, consistently with justice and sound policy, to be protected accordingly from Foreign and Colonial competition. This,l conceive, will entitle them to that pro tection stated in my letter to Mr. Vatisittart, and inserted in the Morning Post of the 26th ult., and in an Evening Paper of the ltith inst.; and although foreign ships may not cost their owners 1-10th as much as British ships do, still that is no concern of ours, it belongs solely to traffickers, consumers, &c. The value of an article to that State in which it is produced, and the protection of it ac cordingly, is all that Statesmen have to attend to, and when it is - so protected let commerce have the freedom of air. • I conceive ;hat the consequences of the pro posed measures for opening the West India trade to foreigners will be the deprivation of profitable employment of about 100,000 British subjects at home and in our Colonies, and about 50,000 tons of British shipping, that it will create a spirit of disaffection in British America whichmay cause a separation of those Colonies, so valuable for taking off our excess of population, for supplying us with timber, and for giving employment to our shipping, Mat it will occasion a diminution of our general consumption and revenue, and an increased charge on the landed interest, through the poor rates ; that it will multiply disturbances among those people whom it will be the means of depriving of profitable employment, and con sequently increase the expence of criminal jus tice ; and what is still worse, that it will pro duce all these most pernicious results, without one countervailing benefit, either to the West India slave masters themselves, for whose good it is intended, or to the Empire generally, but on the contrary that it will prove most injurious to the planters, as it will only cause a change of customers, while it will diminish the consump tion of sugar within the British Empire. Yet it is plainly to be perceived that the main objects of those slave proprietors is to perpetuate slavery in the West Indies in opposition to the spirit of our Constitution, to our public professions to other powers, and to the sacrifices we have been under to induce them to desist from this traffic, and that their further aim is to make us pay 25 per cwt., or more than we do at present for our West India sugar, although we are now paying from 10s. to 15s. per cwt. more than if we con sumed East India sugar, or were rid of our West India sugar altogether. Thus we are supporting, at a vast expence to the British public, a system of slavery that would otherwise die a natural death ; for if those slave masters were deprived of their undue protection, they would emanci pate their slaves from self-interest. I therefore hope that every person in the Empire, and that every philanthropist in particular, will adopt every legal means in their power to frustrate the views of these West India slave proprietors. If these Gentlemen slave masters claim this further protection on the grounds of vested rights, refer them to my letter to Mr. Gooch, published in the New Times of yesterday. The inclosed letter will show you more clearly the loss to the British Empire by this disgrace ful and unnatural West India connection. It appears that you do not consider in your in tended protecting duties the value of British shipping, nor what has been the cost to the State of supporting and defending those Colonies on the average of the last 30 years. Now, however great the losses have been to the British Empire of what I have above enume rated, and are likely to be, still they are only as a feather in the scale compared to the loss occa sioned to the dignity of the Nation by the breach of an established law in order to comply with the avaricious request of Slave Masters, or the threats of an insignificant Foreign State reared by our folly to its present power, and which assumes a consequence by having defeated a few of our patronage ships of war ; and I say further, that if ever that power becomes our rival, it will be throuel the folly of our Le gis;ature much more than its own wisdom. Now, it should be a consideration with you how far this sacrifice of our interest may not open the door to demands on you from every power in the world. Did you and your Colleagues but know the mighty resources of the British Empire, and that the profitable employment of our people constitutes its wealth and prosperity, that all legitimate commerce is founded on mutual wants, and reciprocity of benefits, and bow to define those wants and benefits, — Did you but know that a system of Finance, which in its operation increases the wealth of the whole and of the individual , while it creates its _ _ _ own resources and revenue,—and did you but know that the agriculture of the British Empire constitutes the root of and propelling pbwer to all our other industry, and that there is hardly a climate or soil on the habitable globe in which we have not a settlement capable of producing our supplies,—and that we have an idle popu lation capable of cultivating such products, and who would by so doing make us independent of rival foreigners' aid,—and did you but know the disastrous effects of your own commercial measures and the real state of the country, and that while you are pluming yourselves on a Sound revenue, if a proper allowance were made for the increase of population, and the consumption of the capital of the landed interest in lieu of their income, you would see that it is this year about 15 millions short of a sound production. Did you but know the bulwark which the na tion possesses in the talents of Sir G. COCKBURN, were he allowed to have the complete controul . - of the construction ) officering and manning of the British Navy,— When not a ship in, the world, ton by ton, gun by gun, and man by man y would dare to oppose him, — Did you but know the means it would give him for manning that navy, were we to import our sugar from the East in lieu of the West Indies; also to produce our own hemp, flax, cot ton, and tobacco, in our Colonies, by the exten sion of our shipping and seamen, in bringing those articles home, and in taking out our unem ployed and would be valuable people,— I say, did you but know half of these circum stances, and the fundamental principles of poli tical economy, which I have so often described in my various letters, you and your colleagues would not be into the measures, or silenced by the insults of any power or party, much less by the insignificance of America or Russia, or by slave-masters or foreign mercantile interests. I therefore hope, for the honour and benefit of our country, that you will bring yourself ac quainted with those fundamental principles of political economy (with an outline of which I have so often furnished you), when, I trust, you will no longer feel like the stranger by night in an African forest, who fears every movement of the foliage to be an attack from a lion. Allow me to say, further, when you take quo tations from authors which may be applicable to a world governed by one Government and taxed equally alike, that they will not do for a nation like England, insulated from its neighbours, by a treble taxation. I beg to say, that did I stand in need of exe cutors in trust, or of friends in any other way, as relates to private life, I would for that purpose make choice of you, Sir, and some of your col leagues ; but as statesmen, I would prefer some of those of the regenerated nations of Europe and America. With the exception of the duties on foreign wool and rice (and they are not carried fa i r enough), no commercial or financial measure has been adopted since the late war that has been founded on correct principles of political eco nomy, suitable for a nation circumstanced like England ; but, on the contrary, those measures have been like so many props applied to super structures on the one side, while sappers and miners have been at work on the other ; and even these two measures appear to have been adopted only by the influence of party. There is no other way of restoring the Bri tish Empire to prosperity than that of protecting every interest from foreign competition, accord ing to its respective value to the State, and let commerce then have the freedom of air. This will, amongst other things, cause about one fourth of the West India sugar plantations to be restored to cotton plantations, and relieve both the sugar and cotton planters. Although the principles I advocate are next to nature itself in simplicity, and have been acted on in part daring about the last 200 years, to which we owe our past prosperity, still I con sider it as difficult for those who have been schooled in the new fangled political economical doctrine of the day, and who know nothing of the practical results of their arrangements, to understand me, as it was for those to understand GALILEO who imprisoned him for saying the world was globular. One of the greatest favours that could be be stowed on England, and the greatest curse on the United States of America, would be to cede our West Indies to the latter power, even if it were free of the many hundreds of Millions of pounds sterling which that unnatural connec tion has cost England in compesi, planting, death of our gallant subjects, &c. &c., as the public would not only save in the cost of their sugar from 10s. to 15s. per cwt., but be relieved of taxes, Sze. &c., for the support of those Islands, give additional 'employment to about 100,000 tons of British shipping to bring sugar from the East in lieu of the West Indies, and increase the market for our manufactures, but the nation would get rid of the dis grace of supporting slavery in opposition to the spirit of our constitution and our pro fessions to other powers.—This measure, if accom plished would also (as it appears to me) be in unison with your general conciliating policy ob served towards America, in order, as you erro neously suppose, to avoid war with that nation. While the mighty resources of the British Em pire remain, as they now are, unknown to our Statesmen, &c. nothing can be half so fortu nate to this country as the foreign ports of the world being shut aginst us. This would have a similar effect with BUONAPARTE'S continental system, and cause us, as that measure did, to have recourse to our own,resources, and thereby rise superior to ourselves, when in a few years our national industry would be double to what it now is, without leaving an industrious man un employed. Your Colleagues do not seem to be aware, when they boast of the amount of our exports, that if that portion of them which went out for the payments of foreign corn, hemp, flax, cotton, tobacco, rice, and timber, and to pay for foreign ships freights, amounting, as I presume, to about twenty millions per annum, had been destroyed at home, on condition of their being replaced and exchanged for the like, native and colonial products would be a national benefit of more than equal value to their invoice cost. This should be borne in mind by Statesmen, and cause them to make the distinction between the value to the State of exports, as payments for colonial and foreign products,which we cannot pro duce ourselves, and the loss to the State of exports, as payments of foreign commodities that we can produce ourselves ; as every native product, ex changed for a native or colonial product, gives double the profitable employment to our people that those do which we exchange for the like fo reign products as we ourselves could produce. If our commerce were founded on mutual wants and reciprocity of benefits, or if we did our own work with our own people, so far as we are able, or if our Statesmen knew that we could only carry commerce in exports to the extent of our ability to consume their return payments, and the profitable employment of our people gave limits to that consumption, all that I have been trying so long to impress on our Statesmens' minds would be accomplished ; yet the best proof they can give the world of their own system being wrong and mine right, is that their measures are fast destroying the indus try of the Empire. Your very obedient Servant, JOSEPH PINSENT (A TRUE PITTITEO• UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE. CAMBRIDGE, MAY 2.—M r. Charles Henry Maturin, of King's college, was on Sunday last admitted Fellow of thl t society. At an Ordination holden by the Lord Bishop of Bristol,. ill the chapel of Christ college, on Sunday last, the following Gentlemen were ordained : PRIESTS. Edward John Ash, B.A. Fellow of Christ college, Cambridg e ' John Cantis, B.A. Fellow of Christ college, Cambridge. Henry Robert Fowler, B.A. Exeter college, Oxford. • Rich. Jeffreys, 111. A. fellow of St. John's college, Cambridge} With Let. Dim. fronz Bishop of M.., John Brooks Atkinson, ILA. Sidney college, Cambridge. With Let. Dim. from Bishop of Cheater• I George Edward Wentworth, Morris. With Let. Dinz. from Bishop of Nova Scot• DEACONS. Thomas Baker, B.A. Christ college, Cambridge. George Stone, B.A. Sidney college, Cambridge. With Let. Dim. from-Bishop of Chichester . William Clarke, B.A. Magdalen-hall, Oxford. Edw. Reginald illantell, B.A. Emmanuel col. Cambridge. With Let. Dim. from Bis'rop of Sarin' Newton Smart, B.A. University college, Oxford. With Let. Dim. from Bishop of Durha. o ° The Lord Bishop of Peterborough will hold an ordination the cathedral church of that city, on Trinity Sunday. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. BURTON HUNT RACES, THURSDAY.—(LAST DAY Sweepstakes of 7gs. each, for horses not thorough-bred, eau ° ing list. 41b. Two-mile heats. 1 Mr. Lipscombe's ch. h. Forester - . 14' 3 a Mr. Gough's br. m. - - - . 41 2 , ; Capt. Grant's Jezebel - - - - 3 3 `at Mr. Farrell's gr. h. Topsy-turvey - - 2 2 4 Handicap Sweepstakes of sgs each, for hunters. I Mr. Scarf's Blue Ruin - - - " 2 Mr. Chowles's Uncle Bob - - - 3 Mr. Coulthard's Crazy Nine started, but the others were beat a long way fro m h o me. A motion for a Petition against the C at --h ° o f Claims was lately negatived, in the Board Aldermen of Dublin, by a majority of three. st • A contract Was entered into, on Friday 1 % 1 ; by a butcher of Maidstone, to supply our Pa ri e workhouse, for the next three months, with b e . d , and mutton, at three-pence per pound. stone Journal.) 18: Extract from the Calcutta Paper, Octob er - i e —"lt is with feelings of great, concern _that ti f notice the melancholy accident which re ceij n i ? occurred below Kedgeree. Doctor Mong,ls;i, of Tirhoot, and Captain LINDSAY, of the P7O, neers, had proceeded down the river in a 5 to ing boat, called the Claudine, beloogingose Messrs. H. MATHEWS and Co. for the ri r a ,P e r, of meeting some of the family of the f°,ofrii e 5, expected from England in the William )" be' On the morning of the 10th Oct. whils t oof tween Kedgeree and Saugor, it began t°.,,,set very hard, when unfortunately the boat.so`ols under a press of sail, and, out of 26 indivi otie• who were on board, consisting of the two g i e the men and 24 natives, only two were save°,o,eot Manjee of the boat and a Bearer. The Ill e ee ,s this distressing event was known at Kedg er Do t row-boat was dispatched to the fatal pla ce not a vestige of the wreck was to be seen . , r a s s e i On Tuesday morning, as a lady from the c ounty S i de , turning from the Bank, she was hustled in rhea totes robbed - of her pocket-book, containing 801. in Ban"i f nalelo sovereigns. She suspects it to have been taken by !'t er e,,, e t some (apparently) ladies looked up at a house, as if `, otg something to attract notice, and while the lady Iva" 8/00 guard, the robbery was effected. It is a little singular that' Barnett, w h° ,,idel r ecently executed at Leicester, was the principal ee (aloof against Babington, who was executed at the same plea self st acicAr with the Luddites), five years ago, for setting fire. a n d fin oats. He afterwards married Babington's widow, . got hanged himself for poisoning, her.--(.511 BIRTIIS. Cal encli°' On Thursday, at his house, Queen Ann-street, square, the Lady of C. Pepys, Esq. of a daughter. tiee,jll Yesterday s in Montague-place, the Lady of Osg . Esq., of a daughter. MARRIED. s n ow' , WO* Yesterday, at St. Dunstan's, Stepney, 'Wm. _ of Mile-end, surgeon, to Emma, only daughter of the Lee Esq. of Well-street, Hackney s tbe te o i On Wednesday last, T. Wilkinson, Esq., of -°° re, t Miss Sophia Meilan, of York-place, Portman-sclua daughter of the late D. i\leilan, Esq. - v - v • °V.P On the Ist inst. at Sunning, in Berkshire, rn,hcote, cote, Esq. youngest son of the late Rev. C. 'l l . Bea' ate'to Elizabeth, youngest daughter of the late James of Deanwater, county of Cheshire. , New michse 4 ' - ti On the 29th of April, at Newington, Surrey, Ate cif Esq. Esq. in his 86th year, many years a merchant 111 '- London. ell-P l3ce ' On Thursday last, at her son's hou se, Stockist Woolley, in the 85th year cf her age. , Oarnibi3l r b o t u a g s h d s y t r , e t e h t 2C)htahs.o Jas.f A p Francisril,a his s f a ther's overre , Ts the 911* Printed and Published for the PROPRIETORfI, Office, No. No. 112, Strand , by J. B. CAavrxiits• her e at ( jest 3 ,4tvi any ift el Mc/Lie dr eg fOrn Psrf,