The Sun. — London, England, 1832-01-20 00:00:00

05 z r - I • . . f 16,,r , • "fr , •/' . 41 , 1 •1111,VAVir , 0 4 ."'.;"\ \ l - .`." t Avol. . ' I • ? s 'l* - - 4 , 7 , TS' • •Ket, 4kf 'g ; • • .3t,‘ ,1 . 4 .• , .t 4 ' 7 yr 7, F- ! . ; z f!,:! ADMIRALTY-OFFICE, D. 18, 1831. NOTICE is hereby given, that a .SESSION of OYER and TERMINER and GAOL DE LIVERY fur the Trial of Offences committed on the 111011 SEAS, within the jurisdiction oldie Admiralty of England, will be held at Justice Hall, in the Old Bailey, London, on THURSDAY, the 2d of February next, at Right &clock in the morning. And all Sheriffs, Gaolers, and Keepers of Prisons, in w'hote custody any Prisoners, charged with Offences corn witted on the High Seas, or within the said Jurisdiction may be, are hereby required to transmit a copy of the Comniiiment of every such Prisoner to Mr. CHARLES JONES, the Solicitor of the Admiralty, at his office, No. 10, Lancaster-place, Strand, London, in order that the necessary measures may be taken, for remeving all such Prisoner. to his Majesty's Gaol of Newgate, for trittl at the s tid intended Session : and all Mayors, Justices . , Coronets, and other Officers, before whom any Inquisi tions, Informations, Examinations, or Recognizances may I"-tve been taken touching any such Offences, are required ttansmit the same forthwith to Mr. JOHN CLARK, the Clerk of Arraigns of the High Court of Adrni r.lty of England, at his Office, at the Sessions House in the Ohl Bailey, London. GEORGE ELLIOT. CARPETS.--CARTER and CO., 2, Cheapside, near St. Paul's. Per yard. Brussels, of first rate texture, 13 1 ) patterns, 4s. 4d. and 4s. &I. the most fashionable in the trade Brussels, of patterns less modern, but o 3s. 10d. and 4s. Od. „ very best quAlity olaasels, of very good quality, useful neat sa. 441. and 35.64. Xr t e te rz r n n inster and Venetian, yard-wide, ex- 2.5. 4d. and 2s. Ca. eellent quality for bed-rooms, Sce ' D itto, superior quality, very fine Fiv e Hundred Hearth Rugs, with Stair Carpeting, Floorcloths, Druggets, and other articles connected with the Trade equally cheap. C. and Co., at this season of the year, feel pride in an nouncing the fact, that their annual sales (by retail only) I °, , the last five years have exceeded 100 , 000 yards , and the quality of their goods have given universal satisfaction. N.B. Patterns forwarded to any part of Town or Country. Letters per post are respectfully requested to be free. THE TEETH. TENDER and Decayed TEETH effectually and. permanently. Reaored, by Mr. HOWARD, Surgeon Dentist, 52, Fleet-street, with an ANODYNE CEMENT, which he applies in 'Meessfully to decayed TEETH, however, large the- cavity* where every other kind of stopping has failed, as it is used in a soft paste, not requiring any heat or pressure, nor giving the least pain even where the tooth is most tender, and becomes as hard AR the tooth itself. _ Artificial Teeth, which will never discolour or decay, suppli e d from a single tooth to a complete set. At Home from Ten till Five. INCORRODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH FIXED ON THE PARISIAN PRINCIPLE, AND FILLING DECAYED TEETH WITH MINERAL SUCCE DANEUM. ONSIEUR MALLAN, SURGEON DENTIST, No. 9, HALF MOON-STREET, PICCADILLY, grateful for the high and EXTENSIVE PATRONAGE which has so eminently distinguished his professional exertions since his arrival in the British Me tropolis, begs leave to announce to his Friends and the Public in general, that he still CONTINUES to RE- S TORE DECAYED TEETH, with his CELEBRATED AIINERAL SUCCEDANEUM, so universally recom mended by the Faculty of London and Paris. The Ope ration is PERFORMED IN A FEW SECONDS, with out the SLIGHTEST PAIN, HEAT, or Pressure; - and allays the most EXCRUCIATING PAIN, and lasting for many years; he also FASTENS LOOSE TEETH, WHETHER ARISING from AGE, NEGLECT, or DISEASE in the GUMS. INCORRODIBLE MI NERAL and NATURAL TEETH, from one to a COM PLETE Set, which are INCAPABLE of DISCO LOURATION or CORROSION, and fixed without the incumbrance of Wires or any other LIGAI URES, and amwer every PURPOSE of ARTICULATION and MASTICATION.—Charges us in Paris. All Operations performed on the Teeth. ATKINSON'S CAMPHOR SOAP. JA MES and EDWARD ATKINSON respectfully solicit the attention of the Public to the above article; they will not presume ,to point out the anti-contagious qualities of Camphor, but they fearlessly challenge a comparison with any article sold under the name of Camphor Soap ; indeed, many have nothing of Camphor but the name, but this may at once be known by its fragrance and appearance. It is perhaps the most powerful preparation of Camphor that can he formed in a fixed state. It is a most excellent Soap fell- washing, being very mild, correcting all hardness and redness the: skin arising from labour or inclement weather, and its sooth ing properties for chapped hauls are too well known to need repetition. It readily dissolves in water, communi cating to it a flavour equal to what is usually sold as Spirits of Camphor, and its aroma immediately fills the atmosphere of the largest apartment. —Price Is. the square. N.B. Prepared also in Shaving Cakes, various sizes. .Abo ATKINSON'S CONCENTRATED ESSENCE of CAMPHOR, the strongest preparation of Camphor that can he made in a liquid state. A few drops added to Lavender Water, Eau de Cologne, or any other article, wakes what is known as Camphorated Lavender, &c. Also ATKINSON'S CAMPHOR PASTE, particu larly adapted to a cold season for pre'venting the hands chopping and immediately allaying the pain. Prepared and sold by James and Edward Atkinson, Per fumers, 21, Old Bond-street, corner of Burlington-gardens, (Removed from 44, Gerrard street, and 36, New Bond- Street), and sold by their appointment by Truefit, 20, Mintram, 7, and Fox, 32, Burlington-arcade; 'Woodman, 46 , Piccadilly ; Mason, 38, Haymarket ; Fox, 70, Taylor, 92, an d Wil son , 277, Strand ; Mattrass, 85, Fleet-street ; Read, 9, Crawford-street; Riker, 24, New-street ; Grange, 126, Firth, 45, and Balls, 131, Oxford-street; Elms, 62, Holborn ; Johnston, 68, Cornhill ; Colley, 28, Bishopsgale••street ; Marquis, 72, Coleman-street ; and by one or more Perfumers in most principal Towns. THE IMPETUOSITY of PASSION, arid the coincidence of general gaiety must involve a considerable portion of the community in the sufferance of thosedisorders which are destined to be the punishment of illicit indulgence. And since the time of Monkish Bliperstition, no blame has been imputed to medical Practi tioners for the exertions of their skill in the removal of these complaints. As medical ability cannot therefore be more usefully or more respectably employed, it is only nece*sary to inquire where it can be most decisively depended upon, certainly not among those who rush without education into the practice of Et.culapian slaughter; but anumg those who, after regular initiation, confine their exertions to one point, and concentrate their skill in the study and treatment of One Branch. Dr. Courtenay, from the University of Edinburgh, is e ntitled by his qualifi ca ti on to ma k e t hi s selection, and after unprecedented success for upwards of Thirty-five Years, be may now without presumption, offer restoration in cases where the most eminent Practitioners have failed. An Insidious Disorder may be contracted in an unguarded mcnient of intoxication. By this plan of cure, pain is prevented, the possibility of danger precluded, and the constitution is left, not merely unimpaired, but absolutely improved by the process. The sufferings of this complaint are however trifling compared with the consequ e nces of that d e structive prac tice for which Chian suffered death. To those whose feelings are susceptible of the misery which this pernicious habit has occasioned, it may be some consolation to know, that, by proper perseverance, the most deplorable d e bility "'ay be removed. When estates are dependant on the Progeny of married people, the removal of those impedi ments is to many the restoration of life's Lest enjoyment, for is it unreasonable to expect success from the connection of that peculiar state of the constitution, by which con ception is prevented, or the embryotic prisoner constantly destroyed. It is the exult of Dr. Courtenay's experience, to offer a safe and certain removal of these impediments, and by correcting the morbid state of the uterine functions the female soon becomes in that state " which Ladies wish to be who love their Lords." Dr. Courtenay may be con sulted personally, or by letter, with the greatest secrecy and honour, at his house, No. 21, Leicester-square. Patients in the country describing the particulars of their complaints, age, mode of living, &c. &c., inclosing arentittance for advice and 'Medicines will have the same given or sent to any part of the world.—Letters are ex pected to be post- paid. Dr. Courtenay has removed from No. 6, Robert-street, Adelplii, to No. 21, Leicester.square, where he continues to practice, and is consulted as heretofore. Dr. Courtenay Las no connection whatever with the young man now practising at his late residence, and he thinks it is due to those Notiletnen and Gentlemen, who have hitherto so liberally honoureil him with their confidence, to make this public declaration in consequence of that individual presum ing to state vet holly and in writing to several of Dr. Cour tamay's patients, that he had retired altogether from practice, and assigned it to him, —Dr. C, has done no such thing. o. 12.279. NEW WORK BY MR. COOPER. This day was published, in 9 vols. post 8 vo. H E B R A V 0. A Venetian Story. " nie 'Bravo' displays all the energy, all the singleness of pur. pose, and a greater grandeur of design, than is usually painte by its author. We also trace in it a greater degree of refine ment and grace."—Westminster Review. Henry .Colburn and Richard Bentley, New Burling ton-street. Of whom may be had, by the same Author, In 3 vols. post Svo. THE WATER WITCH, - Or, The SKIMMER of the SEAS. Second Edition, in 3 vols. small Svo. 21s. THE BORDERERS. O►, The WEPT of WISH-TON WISH*. • INTERESTING NEW PUBLICATIONS. LATELY PUBLISHED By Messrs. COLBURN and BENTLEY. I. MUSICAL: MEMOIRS. By W. .T. PARKE, •Esq. 2 vols. comprising a fund of in formatifin relative to Music, the Stage, and their eminent Votaries for the last fifty years. H. CONVERSATIONS of the late celebrated De. PA LEY, and other Literary Memorials, by 11. BEST, Esq. of Oxford. 1 vol. The LIFE and CORRESPONDENCE of MAJOR CARTWRIGHT; comprising a complete History of RefOrm. 2 vols. • • Iv. CONVERSATIONS of the late JAMES NORTH COTE, Esq. with WILLIAM HAZLITT. 1 vol. MENiOIRS of MRS. SIDDONS, with a fine Por trait by Turner, from Sir Thomas Lawrence. Second Edition. 2 vols. CONVERSATIONS of LITERARY MEN and STATESMEN. By WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR, Esq. Second Edition, corrected and enlarged. 3 vols. Bvo. 31s. 6d. The LOVES of the POETS:—BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS of WOMEN celebrated in Ancient and Mo dern Poetry. By the Authoress of the " Diary of an Ennuyee." '• Heureuse la Beaute que Ic Poete adore ! " Heureux le nom qu'il a chantii:" DE LAIIARTINE. WE, the undersigned Ministers, have no hesitation in recommending the CHRISTIAN ADVOCATE Newspaper, on the following grounds : Because we believe— I. That it contains a fair digest of the News of the Week. 11. That the Conductors of it scrupulously refuse inser tion to every thing that might have a tendency to engen der or cherish corruption of morals. 111. That the progress of religion, by means of the operations of various institutions, is frequently and faith fully reported in its columns. IV. That, in the opinions set forth from time to time by its Conductors, the appropriateness of its title is illus trated by a uniform maintenance of Christian principles, and an uncompromising hostility to un-Christian practices. V. And lastly, because, for the above reasons, we think it may be perused by the members of pious families, not only with safety, but even with advantage. G. Whitfield, London G. Russell, West Bromwich I. Bradnack, Waltham Abbey John Hickling, Wednesbury George Osborne, Brighton Charles Haime, Wednesbury J. W. Thomas, Hastings Henry Powis, Wednesbury P. Jameson, Sevenoaks T. Armson, Wednesbury W.Brocklehurst,HighWycomb C. Cooke, Wolverhampton! Wm. Davies, St. Neot's I. Denison, Wolverhampton James Ray, St. Neot's F. Collier, Redditch J. Lewis, Leighton Buzzard J. Sykes, Coventry Wm. Pollard, Luton H. Tuck, Wrexham Wm. Hinson, Gravesend) 'l'. Jones, Wrexham Wm. D. Goy, Gravesend A. Bell, Macclesfield Robert Pickering, Norwich J. Walsh, Macclesfield Titus Close, Norwich W. 0. Booth, Macclesfield John Reynols, sen. Disa Robert Filter, Stockport James B Holroyd, Lynn J. Hollingworth, Bradford, James Shear, Cambridge Yorkshire George Turner, Cambridge H. Fish, Bradford, Yorkshire J. Sutcliffe, A. M Newbury T. Dickin, Bradford, Yorkshire Isaac Aldom, Brackley J.l%larsden, Keighley F. B. Potts, Kettering R. Treffry, Leeds John Simmons, Salisbury J. Storry, Leeds John Radford, Salisbury D. Isaac, Leeds Wm. Hayman, Devonport F. Calder, Leeds John Burdsall, Plymouth R. Treflry, jun. Bramley Edward Usher, Plymouth W. Carlton, Barnsley Robt. Sherwell, Launceston H. Stephenson, Worksop George Taylor, Redruth J. Pairbourne, Dewsbury Walter Lawry, Falmouth F.Derry, Dewsbury Samuel Webb, St. Austell R. Cope, LL.D., Wakefield John Callaway, St. Austell W. Dalby, Burton.upon-Trent George Jackson, St. Austell Peter Wilkinson, Peterborough Ralph Scurrah, Penzance J. 'Amman Peterborough Benj. Carvosso, Penzance J. Chettle, Louth Wm. Davies, Penzance R. R. Keeling, Louth John Aikenhead, Exeter J. Smith, Louth Wm. B. Fox, Exeter It. I)ay, Boston R. Shepherd, Moreton - , Ham,- Robert Gover, Boston stead W. Horton, Boston James Wood, Bristol B. Hudson, Barton Joseph Taylor, Bristol S. Hope, Y , ,rk John W. Cloake, Kingwood Wilk. Stephenson, York John Evans, Batmen Hugh Beech, Selby Wm. P. Burgess, Gloucester John Heap, Selby Jos. R. ‘-tephens, Cheltenham John Nowell, North Shields John Wevill, Abergavenny Wm. Robson, North Shields Wm. Wilson, Devizes Thomas Dunn, North Shields T. Doughty, Shepton Mallett Myles C. Dixon, Carlisle R. R. Mole, Shepton Mallett Abel Dernaley, Carlisle John Hodson, Warminster John P. Haswell, Edinburgh Henry Cheverton, Sherborne John M'Lean, Edinburgh W. Trampleasure, Glastonbury Thos. Cocking, Aberdeen John Crowe, Glastonbury Robert Leake, Aberdeen SHETLAND ISLES. Richard Tabraham, Lerwick I John Bollom, Yell John Newton, Lerwick Robert Thwaites, Yell John Stephenson, Walls W. Rickets, Northmavin Abraham Whitehouse, Tortola, Weft Indies. The Christian Advocate Newspaper bas been established upwards of two years. It contains 32 columns of matter, printed in the Quarto form for the convenience of family reading and 'preservation, and is published every Monday Afternoon, price Sevenpence. As a general Newspaper it contains a condensed but complete epitome of the News of the Week, both Domestic and Foreign, an abstract of Parliamentary Debates and Law Proceedings, a collection of Miscellaneous, Useful, and Entertaining Facts, occasional Notices of Literature and Science, original articles on Agricultural 'subjects, the Corn, Colonial, and other Markets, &c. &c. ; thus entirely superseding, to serious persons, the use of any other Lon don Weekly Journal. The extensive circulation of the Christian Advocate, which is found in most Towns and Villages in England, and in many parts of Ireland and Scotland, besides foreign parts, renders it a most advantageous advertising medium. Orders for the Christian Advocate arc received by any respectable Newsman, Clerk of the Roads, or Bookseller, throughout the kingdom, or by the Publisher, Mr. John Stephens, at the Christian Advocate Office, No. 4, Red Lion.court, Fleet-street, London, to whom all Advertise ments and Communications (post-paid) are to be addressed. STIRLING REE'S CUBEBS, 'WITH SARSA PAAILLA, &c. THE most safe, certain, and speedy remedy ever discovered for the Cure of Gonorrhoea, Gleets, Strictures, Seminal Weakness, Pains of the Loins, Kidneys, Irritation of the Bladder and Urethra, Gravel, and other Disorders of the Urinary Passages, frequently performing a cure in the short space of three or four days. It contains all the efficacious parts of the Cuheb, combined with the Salt of Sarsaparilla, and other choice ingredients, which makes it valuable for the removal of Secondary Symptoms, Pains of the Bones, and all Diseases arising from an impure state of the fluids. In cases of Debility, a perseverance in its use has beets found to give strength and increase of health to the whole System. The most delicate female may take it with perfect satky. Prepared only by J. W. Stirling, Chemist, 86, White chapel, from whom it can be sent to any part of the work, (upon enclosing the amount), in bottles, at 4s. 6,1., I Os. and 20s. Caution—As there is a spurious imitation, be sure " J. W. Stirling" is written on the stamp. Agents--Sanger, 150, Oxford-street ; Prout, 226, Strand ; • Barclay, Farringdon-street ; Gilbert and Co., 27, Newcastle-street, Strand ; Harvey, 68, Great Sur rey-road, Blackfriars ; Johnstone, 68, Cornhill ; Nix, Royal Exchange ; Heudebourk, 326, Middle-row, Hol born ; Norton and Turner, 309, High Holbor n ; Wil mot, Borough; Souther, Canterfway ; Tandy and Bailey, erhampton ; King, Market place, Bath ; Bulk: ey , Staveley, Derbyshire; and all the principal Medicine Venders in Town and Country. LONDON, FRIDAY RVENING, JANUARY 20, 1832. HE MEDICAL - GA z-ETTE.s.ii-flan wary 21, 'will contain, in additi;itiet tditorial Contributions, TW'EN'TY' ORIGNAL LECTURES, PAPERS, and LETTERS, by the foltowingGeittlt:men Dr. Ellictson, Mr. COLli401), Dr. M. Hall, 11ft. Herning, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Huntley, Mr. Coley, Dr. Johnson, Mr. Hallett, Dr. Knapp, Dr. Phillips, Mr. Knight, gr. Searle, Mr. Crowdy, Mr. Tweedie, Dr. Hazlewood, Dr. Gibson, Dr. Lindsey, Dr. Ogden, and Mr. Grretiv--"tlie Lefters Of the last five being observations on the. TREATMENT of CHOLERA, as they have witnessed it. in the North of England ; curious Taliacotian Operation by De. Mott; with wood-cuts, &c. Ecc. _ _ London :Published every Saturday. by Longrnati and Co. ELEMENTARY FRENCH WORKS. This day was published, A N UNIVERSAL FRENCH GRAM -1-1 MAR ; being an accurate System of- ?reach Ac cidence and Syntax.' •ByiNICHOLAS HAMEL. Neiv Edition, price 4s. bound. GRAMMATICAL EXERCISES upon the French Language compared with the English. By N. HAMEL. 4s. bound. • • A KEY to HAMEL'S FRENCH EXERCISES. 3s. hound. • The WORLD in MINIATURE; containing an Ac count of the different Countries in the World, with Refe rences to the essential Rules of the French Lantbage pre fixed, -By N. HAMEL. New Edition. 4s. 601. bound. A KEY to CHAMBAUD'S FRENCH EXECISES. By E. J. VOISIN. I 2!ito. 4s. bound. " An ottstrivfxroß4F , ; , PßONOUNC RIC• ?VONA'SY .- 46'e "FRENCH' LAINIGUArtrVVrenai and English ; 'Wherein the exact Sound and ArticulatiOn of every Syllable are distinctly marked. By L'ABBE TARDY. 12tno, 6s. bound. Printed for Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Co. ; and Whittaker, Treach r and Arnot, London. NEW WORKS, Printed fur LONGMAN, REES, and Co. L IFE of FREDERIC 11., KING of PRUSSIA. By LORD DOVER. 2 vols. Bvo. with Portrait. 28s. boards. LIFE and DEATH of LORD EDWARD FITZ GERALD. By THOMAS MOORE, Esq. 2 vols. post Svo. with a Portrait. Second Edition. 21s. boards. Sir E• SEAWARD'S NARRATIVE of his SHIP WRECK, and CONSEQUENT DISCOVERY of CER TAIN ISLANDS in the CARRIBEAN•SEA. With a Detail of many Extraordinary Events in his Life, from 1733 to 1749. Edited 6y Miss JANE PORTER. 3 vols. post Svo. 31s. 6,1. boards. ANNUAL BIOGRAPHY and OBITUARY, Vol. XVI. for 1832. Svo. 15s. boards. PRACTICAL TREATISE on RAIL-ROADS, and Interior Communication in General; containing an Ac count of the Performances of various Locomotive Engines; upwatds of 260 Experiments; with Tables of the value of Canals and Rail-Roads, &c. By N. WOOD, Civil En gineer. Svo. New Edition, numerous Plates. 181. boards. TRADITIONS of LANCASHIRE, Second S-ries. By J. ROBY, 111.R.5.L. 2 vols. with 10 highly-finished En4ravings by Finden, and 10 Wood-cuts by Williams, gze. Derry Svo. 21. 2s. in cloth ; royal Svo. with India proofs, 3/. 3s. ; royal Svo. with India proofs and etchings, 4/. 4s. SUNDAY LIBRARY; a 'Selection of SERMONS from eminent Divines of the Church of England, chiefly within the last half century. With Notes, by the Rev. T. F. DIBDIN, D.D. 6 vols. small Svc). with Six Por traits of distinguished Prelates, 30s. in cloth, POLITICAL LIFE of the RIGHT HON. G• CANNING. By his Private Secretary. A. G. STAPLE TON, Esq. 3.-vols. Svo. Second Edition, including the Part omitted in the First. 3Ss. boards. MEMOIR of the LIFE, WRITINGS, and CORRES PONDENCE of JAMES CURRIE, M.D. Edited by his Son, W. W. CURRIE. 2 vols. Svo. with Portrait. 28s. boards. JOURNAL of a RESIDENCE in GERMANY, in 1822, 1825, and 1826. By WILLIAM BEATTIE, M.D. 2 vols. post Svo. 21s. boards. COMPARATIVE VIEW of the SOCIAL LIFE of ENGLAND and FRANCE, from the Restocistiou of Charles 11. to the French Revolution of 1830. By ti Editor of Madame du Deffand's Letters.< vols. Svo. 20s. board.. GUIDE to the ORCHARD and KITCHEN GAR DEN ; containing an Account of the most valuable Fruit •tnri Vegetables cultivated in Great Britain, &v. &c. By G. LINDLEY, C.M. H.S. Edited by J. Lindley, F.R S. Svo. 16s. boards. oate that there would be any difficulty in obtaining that attention to it which the subject deserved, without post poning it until the Reforni Bills were disposed of. He was confident that the great and comprehensive mind of his Hon. and Learned Friend (Sir E. Sugden) could etnbrtee not only the Reform Bills, but' the General Registry Bill, at one and the same time. After a few observations from Mr. C. Pelham, Mr. Hume, Mr. C. Ferguson, Mr. D. W. Harvey, Mr. Sand- ford, and Sir R. Vyvyan, the petition was read anti or dered to be printed. THE GLOVE TRADE. Mr. CRAMPTON presented a petition from certain glove-manufacturers in the town of Milborne-port, Somer. setshire, complaining of the free importation of French gloves, and stating the distress to which the trede was in consequence reduced. Mr HUNT observed that the distress in the glove trade in Worcester, Woodstock, and Yeovil, was very great. He was sorry that the Members for the former places were not present. Mr. HUME denied that the distress in the glove trade was attributed to the removal of the prohibition. All other branches of manufacture were equady distressed, but it was absurd to suppose it was the result of the free trade system. After a few words from Mr. WARBURTON, Sir R. VIrvAN, and Mr. Setenroen, Mr. S. RICE said he had had the honour of receiving a deputation of glove-manufacturers, who stated the difficulties under which that trade laboured, and un doubtedly from all that they suggested they proposed no plan that could remove those difficulties unless•the pro e. h ibietlyeseasesetori"'Wefeit tlr"Vg a ittettirir the word prohibition was for ever banished from the com mercial code of this country—(Hear, hear)—end he was sure that it would be impolitic to resort to it in this case. Even it it were resorte f to, would it put down smuggling? He was sure no person who paid any attention to these matters would answer in the affirmative. The deputation suggested that licences should be granted as a means of preventing smuggling, but great pains were takers to con vince them that that mode would but increase the diffi culties at present existing. They also proposed that gloves should be stamped, but then by at any time forging the stomp every facility would be afforded to injure the fair trader.—(Hear.) His Majesty's Go vernment had every disposition to remedy the evils if they could do so, but the result of the conference with the de putation was, that nothing which they suggested would operate as a remedy. Mr. D. W. HARVEY, so far from believing that the evils complained of arose out of the free trade system. said he would tell the hard-working and industrious poor that there were but three remedies, and those were—lst, great economy in the public expenditure; 2d, a large re duction of taxation and the levying a property-tax; and 3d, a free trade in corn It was a mere waste of time and of parchment to attribute the distress to a free trade. The petition was then read and ordered to be printed. The Hox. MEMBER. also presented a similar petition from a place the name of which we did not hear. Mr. ROBINSON, who had but a few minutes before entered, observed that he understood it had been stated • that his 11Iajesty's Government after taking the subject into their consideration were not prepared themselves to come forward with any specific charge. Mr. SPRING RICE stated that the Hon. Member had been totally misinformed of what he did state. What he bad said was, that he had been waited upon by several gentlemen in the trade, who had proposed to him certain remedies which they thought would be the means of eradicating the evil they complained of; bus which he (Mr. S. Rice), after great consideration, wa, perfectly satisfied would rather aggravate than diminish the disease. Mr. ROBINSON would not then press the matter fur ther upon the attention of the House, as an Hon. Col. league of his intended, in a few days, to bring the subject forward. He, however, had been in hopes that Govern ment would, by this time, have been prepared to state whether they had any remedies to suggest, or were prepared again to adopt the prohibitive system. Mr. WEYLAND thought that those who were the greatest advocates for free trade ought to make an excep tion on the part of this particular branch of commerce. On the motion of Mr. CA IV PBELL, the Limitation of Actions Bid, the Fines and Recoveries Bill, the Curtesy of England B 11, and Dower and Inheritance Bill, si ere ordered to be committed on the 25th January; and the General Registry Bill to be read the second time on the Ist of February. Mr. HUNT presented a petition from the Political Union of Manchester, praying fir Parliamentary Re form, annual Parliaments, universal suffrage, and vote by ballot. On the Hon. Member's moving that the petition be brought up, The SPEAKER wished to know in what manner the petition was subscribed? Mr. HUNT observed that it was subscribed as the pe• tition of the members of the Manchester Political Union, in public meeting assembled, and that it was signed by a Mr. Grieves, as the chairman. The SPEAKER observed that no petition could be received in that House presented from petitioners in the plural number, unless it was signed by the petitioners. If the petition came from a corporate body, and signed on behalf of that body—that body being a legal body—the petition would be received; but in the present instance, it being signed by a single individual for a body of which the law took no cognizance, it could not'he received. Mr. HUNT then said he would withdraw the petition in order to have it regularly signed. The Hos. MExtEEK then pros, nted another petition from the Members of the North Western Metropolitan Union of Marylebone and St. Pancras, praying for the repeal of the assessed taxes.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. STANLEY stated, in answer to a question from Mr. Leader, that he h id received yesterday a paper, which would give that gentleman part of the information he de sired, showing the total population of Ireland, according to its present census, to he 7,731,000 ; being an increase of 131 per cent. on the census of 1821. Mr. LEADER then moved that there be laid on the table a comparative abstract of the population of Ireland, taken in 1821 and 1831. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, J4NUARY 19. The LORD CHANCELLOR took his seat a few minutes atter Five o'clock': Lord DURHAM moved that the evidence taken before the Irish Tithe Committee be printed.—Ordered. The Duke of RICHMOND presented a petition from the operatives engaged in the glove trade at ➢lil horne-port, praying that the importation of foreign gloves be prohibited. Lord BEXLEY presented a petition from the mer chants of Bombay against suttees. Lord ELLENBOROUGH hoped that whatever it might be considered necesaary to do in relation to that question, w,aild be considered without reference to the great question of the charter. Mr. BERNAL and others brought up a Mill for consoli dating the office of Surveyor-General with that of the Woods and Forests, and another Bill the name of which we could not catch. Air. Tomlins, from the Treasury, presented papers. The Earl of ABERDEEN said his Majesty, on the first day of the se , sion, had told the House a treaty had been concluded between the five Powers, relative to the affairs of Belgium, and it would shortly be laid before the House. That had never been done, and it was a matter of general notoriety that, though that treaty ought to have been ratified on the Lith of the present month, it had not yet been done. He gave notice that on this (lay week he would bring the question before the House. Viscount STRANGFORD gave notice that he would take an early opportunity of bringing forward a motion, which would bring the question of the depressed state of the shipping before the House. He was sorry to see that the Ministry were entering into other relations with France before that Power concluded those which they had entered into before, by which the shipping inte rest of this country had suffered so much. Lord ELLENi3OROUG II had moved for papers relative to our present position with Canton tire weeks ago, and then was told by the Noble E trl at the head of his 1113jesty's Government that important information had only recently been received, but it would be I iid before their Lordships on an early occasion. He now wished to know when that information would be produced ? The Marquis of LANSDOWNE, in the absence of Earl Grey, could only say that very important informa tion, connected with that subject, had been received within the last forty-eight hours. There 'as no wish to withhold any of that inf mnation, and it would early be laid on the table.—Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS, JesuANT 19. The SPEAKER. took his seat at Four o'clock. a Bill to enable the Liver pool Marine insurance Company to sue and be sued in the name of the Chairman fur the time being, which was read a first time. Mr. KNIGHT moved for and obtained leave to bring in a Bib to enable the Master of the Rolls in Ireland to try his right to appoint the Secretary to the Rolls' Court. Tilt! Hon. and Learned Gentleman said he had give❑ notice of this motion, and he understood that the Attorney and Solicitor-neral had no objection to the Bill. Mr. STRICKLAND presented a petition from the in habitants of a town in the East Riding of the county of York against the General Registry Bill. Sir E. SUGDEN was formerly of opinion that this Bill ought not to be slowed to pass. At all events, It should not be forced on while the time of the H o use was so much occupied with the Reform Bills. The House was not in a frame of mind to enter calmly into the dis cussion of such qu:stions as this Biz involved. Besides there was no cause why this Bill should be hurried. Mr. CAMPBELL was anxious that the Bill shout; receive a full - and calm discussion, but he did not antici- REFORM BILL.-IRELAND. Mr. STANLEY having presented a petition relative to the Galway franchise, said, I now rise, Sir, to move that leave be given to bring in a Bill to amend the representation of Ireland. In doing so 1 feel it is un necessary, and therefore inexpedient, that I should at any length enter into a discussion of the various topics that might naturally suggest themselves to the consideration of the House during the progress of the Bill, and I think it the snore necessary to do so, because I have no reason to sus pect that the House will refuse me that indulgence which it formerly granted to bring in such a Bill, and partly because I consider the principles on which it is intro duced and supported, to be the same which were so (ally discussed on the English Reform Bill, and not at all likely to be affected by local circumstances, but to remain the same unchanged, because they are the principles of rea st,m, of justi ce , an d o f t h e const i tut i on o f t h e U n i te d E mp i re. For this reason 1 do not think it necessai y to enter into a a discussionopted a and d n theren recognized thiswhich House, I imagine an d to, hich, ave been adopted en recognized with regar d to E ng l an d , must b e recogn i ze d with regard to Ireland, unless it can be shown that there are specific reasons for not applying the same rule of con duct to on e country as to the other.We h ave a d m i tte d t h at it is repugnant to the principles of the Constitution that represent a ti ves f or b oroughs shou ld b e returne d b y nomina tion ; we have admitted that the corporations of towns should not take to themselves a monopoly of those rights intended to be exercised for the benefit of all ; we have admitted that residence is an essential qualification of elec tors for boro ug h s , an d we h ave a d m itt e d a l so th a t a cer t a i n qualification with regard to property, ought to be con sidered as the rule upon which the representative system should be estiblished. Now, if there be any who contend that these principles, in themselves true in Eng land, are false in Ireland ; if there be those who contend that we must have the reality in Eng!and,and must be content in Ireland with the mockery and delusion ;—on them, and not on me, rests the onus of proving that there are those circumstances which justify a deviation from the rule we have adopted. At the same time, Sir, I am quite aware that I ant exposing myself to no contemptible argument on the part of those who, admitting the general principle, yet contend th it neither the time nor circumstances in regard to Ireland have come when it is expedient to agitate such a question. I shall be asked whether this be the time to extend popular rights in a country when the authority of law has been set at defiance, where contention has been in troduced, and excitement prevails that has led to the most frightful excesses. Sir, I feel the force of that argument, Ind I am not insensible to the additional difficulty thrown in our way by the conduct of those who have excited that easily excited people, and who, professing to mean well to the cause of Reform, have by every step they have taken, thrown the most serious impediments in the way of a Re ibrtning Government. At the same time it is not because of the agitation that prevails, but in spite of it, that 1 feel we are not justified in refusing at this time to do jus tice to Ireletel.—(Hear.) I am ready also to admit that the Reform Pill for Ireland need not be so extensive as that for England, and for this reason—that much of what has been done by the present Bill for England, gradually, progressively, and at various intervals, been already effected fur Ireland. If we look at the representation of that country in its present state, bad as it is, and turn back to the description of it which was given in 1793 by Mr. Grattan, it is impossible that any man should say that a real substantial Reform has "not already taken place in the representative ay stem of the country. In Ireland you have no Gatton, 11,, Old Sarum, no boroughs incapable of furnishing a decent constituency. You have nothing to which it is not pos sible to fix the title of a respectable constituency. When Mr. Grattan, in 1793, brought forward his motion for Reform, according to the statement he then made, of 300 Members, 200 were returned by individuals; from tarty to fifty were returned by ten persons ; several of the boroughs had no electors at all ; some had but one ; and, us • the whole, two-thirds of the representa 44101060;exioes of Commons Were returned by ess than' a hundred perionse,—( Hear.) This' is not, says Mr. Grattan, that ancient Constitution of King, Lords, and Commons : it is not even an Aristocracy; it is an Oligarchy ; it is an Oligarchy, not of property, hut of accident ; not of prescription, hut of inno vation. The Reform, however, in Parlament in a great measure which is now adopting with regard to Ire land was adopted at the Union, because they proceeded on a principle of disfranchising the rotten and nomination boroughs. I am not now entering into the consideration whether Ireland should have 300 or 200, or 100 Mem bers, and still less on the mode by which the Union was carried, and the Reform effected. But representation has by that means been put on a different footing, by the cutting off of the rotten and decayed parts : in short, that system which we recommend with regard to England, was adopted in reference to Ireland at the Union. Instead of 300 Members, 100 alone were left ; of these 62 were county Members ; two representatives more were given to the principal cities, and the remaining 31 to the prin cipal boroughs ; thereby doing for Ireland what now we are doing for England.—( Hear, heir) Whet, Mr. Grattan brought forward his proposition for Reform ; he stated the principles on which at that time he recom mended his measure, and I beg that these will be born , in mind, because in a large proportion his views !lave already been carried into effect, while at tit =tune time the other portion is being called int, effect. " We agree, I apprehend, that twelve burgesses should not return Members to Parliament ; we canno differ about the propriety of residence. We agree that close boroughs should be disfranchised, and on extending the right of franchise of the close corpora tions to freemen by birth, marriage, or servitude ; that is, to the respectable resident inhabitants ; perhaps we shalt not differ as to the right of voting, of a universal re" gistry, election to be limited in time, and carried on it, lifferent places." Now a considerable portion of this has been already effected by various Reforms in Ireland. Nearly the whole of it is to be effected, both with regard to England and Ireland, by the Bill about to be introduced to the House. But if there be any distinction to be drawn between England and Ireland, those cases must rest on our shoe ing particular circumstances, either with regard to the terms of land or considerations, to justify us it, making any alteration between the two cases. One of the great mistakes of carrying on the system in Reform at the Union, in cutting off the other decayed hot eughs, appears to be this, that while they struck off the rotten boroughs, anti left the large towns, little if any attention was }slid to what must be considered the vital principle, namely that of those towns which were left, what should be the constituency which the interest, or the Members of those towns had in sending Members to Parliament. It is nothing to say that Belfast in Ireland, or Bith in England, returned a Member to Parliament, but the question is whether the return of that Member is satisfactory to 50,000 persons, or whether the interest is confined to about thirteen persons. Now we propose to follow up in Ireland the system adopted at the Union —that the great boroughs shall send Members to Pitrlie meat, and to go this step further, viz., to see that they shall not only in name, but in reality,:be the Members of those boroughs. With regard to residence, we make that point both in the Bill for England, and to the Bill for Ireland, an essential requisite in the right of voting to send Members to Parliament. Let it be well understood that I take the liberty to follow the laying dawn this broad principle, that we are to do by Ireland as we do by England, unless we can show that those peculiar circumstances exist which render it necessary to aft •r our conduct in re ' spect to the one and in respect to the other. With this proposition I shall take the liberty of comparing the franchise we propose to establish, with the fran chise the English Bill proposes to give. But be fore I proceed to that, I may be permitted to say a few words on the subject, which has excited consider able attention, and upon which I have the mis rortune to differ with some gentlemen, whose opinions I do very greatly respect, but have the good !brume to agree with those whose opinions I more highly esteem. It was proposed by the last Bill to augment the representation of Ireland, by giving five addi tional Members—we propose that it shall be the ' amine now ; at the same time I am aware that there are many gentlemen here who think Ireland has in that respect been unfairly dealt by. In introducing this Bill to Parliament, we are not revising or discussing the terms on which the Union was formed between two in dependent countries ; and I am aware that we should have escaped all this difficulty and not been liable to the attack to which we have been exposed had we laid down the broad rule, that from the proportions fixed at the Union, as regarded Ireland, we would not depart. At the same time I am aware this is a difficulty which we have to meet, and is an argument furnished to our opponents, that it will be our duty to combat with, while at the same time the benefits intended to be given to Ireland are complain d against, because we do not give a sufficient number of Members to Ireland. But if any one will look back to the discussions and the debates which took place in the Irish as well as in the British House of Commons in the year 1800, he will find that there was never any such thing pro posed as that the number of representatives for Ireland should bear an exact proportion to the number itl 'lritish representatives, as compared with the re spective wealth, and the respective population of the different countries. It will appear that at that time a proposal was made and accepted, founded on very loose besis, that the number of Members for Great Britain should be 558, and the number for Ireland 106 to serve in Parliament. And here, I would observe, that there is no injury done to the kingdom of Ireland by the number of additional Members that are given to Scotland, because the arrangement at the Union was not made between England, Ireland, and Scotland, as a party tripartite, but between England and Ireland alone ; and whatever arrangement now takes place be tween England and Ireland does not affect the Irish and English arrangement in any way. Supposing, for Me saince, that a number of Members were taken from Ireland and given to Scotland, why then there might he the same argument raised against such an arrangement. Mr. Pitt, in loosing in Parliament, at the time of the Union, that the proposal from the Irish Parliament should be acceded to, considered the proposal one of justice, anti so reesonsble that he could not think the English Parliament could object to it. It appeared to him difficult to form a fair plan as regarded Members; at the same time he was not aware that exact numbers were very material—nor could he think any proposition could be more proper to be adopted than the proposal which had come front the Irish Parliament; nothing, however, could be more satisfactory than such a statement as this from Mr. Pitt ; and was it to be supposed that the number of Irish representatives was to depend on the varying com parative state of property and population ; and that again to depend upon the jarring affairs of the two countries, in cidental to circumstances which no one could foresee. This never could be the intention of the Imperial Parliament. It is for this reason, . and feeling. that 'it could -have been by d no a t ags means sh e aproperd, to to have to th e s t ronger f orce, but, taken away from ,I re land any abe givenrather that there should be an augm en t at i on f rom t h e advantages stronger to the weaker, that his Majesty's Government proposed to give to the different pat is of Ireland the addi tional five representatives now proposed to be given. In looking at the various qualifications which we have thought it right to adopt with regard to England and It e land, and to the various provisions relating to them, we found it unnecessary to adopt the principle of disfranchise.. ment in Ireland to any very great extent. There are few towns in Ireland now returning 'Members which do not furnish a very respectable constituency. With regard to the freehold qualification for voting in counties, we pro pose to extend to Ireland the saute principle as that adopted with regard to England—i.e., we consider, the propriety of adding to the freehold constituency a leasehold, constituting an adequate share of property, and if any Hon. Gentleman will compare the gushe r. fications of one country and the other, it will be found that the leaseholders of Ireland will not hive the the shglitese reason to complain. In Engl Ind, if a person either have zi lease of 60 years with a beneficial interest of 101., or a lease of 20 years with a beneficial interest of 501. or, if he be a tenant at wi,l, at a rental of not less than 50/. a year, lie is entitled to a vote. In the former Irish Bill the alters native was taken of the amount of rent, but, as unfortu e nately in Ireland, the amount of rent on a lease does not prove the respectability of the voter, and as ; that Bill embraced the objectionable c l ause , viz, that of _paying up the rent, we have in the present Bill struck out the criterion of rent, and adopted that of the beneficial in terest arising from the lease. We originally intenheml to take twenty years as the term, but upon coneidefation and enquiry, it was proved that that period would ex chide a great number of persons who, holding under leases, we considered ought to he fairly entitled to a vote. We found there were so.many leases existing far a term of 21 years. of which the soccupying tenants held in many instances but for six or seven years, that we- therefore adoptel a medium by taking a lease bar 14 years, with e .beneficial interest of 20/. Now, if Hon. Gentlemen com pared the twenty years' lease and the 50/. beoefici ml in terest in England, with . the fourteen .years' lease amid tie beneficial interest of 20/. • in - Ireland, it would be - seen -as far as the leasehclier.. in Ireland was concerned,- be e put',4 nu as, good, and indeed better terms than the lealeholder in England. In England you have die lowest claem of constituency, v;z., the 40s. freeholders, which class is exempted from the constituency of Ireland. I will now refer to some returns which have been presented to this. House for the purpose of showing the proportion in which die property of some of the counties in Ireland is represented. By a paper, which is dated 1830, containing a list of tee freeholders of all the counties in Ireland, it appeared that there were 53,152 freeholders, not less than 22,000 of whom were registered as 50/. freeholders, and 10,000 more as 20/. freeholders, leaving the lowest class of 101. free holders at only about 21,000, and that in a country where the bulk of the property belonged to Protestants, le the county of Munster there were 15,382 Catholic free- holders, of which 7,382 were of 501., 3,113 of 20/., and , 1,900 of 101. In the province of Ulster, where the Pro testant interest was the strongest in Ireland, arid where a large proportion of the lower classes were Protestants, and not Catholics, the 10/. freeholders were in number 8,530 out of a total of little better than 16,000. So that it appears that where die Protestant interest is the greatest, the 10/ freeholders are the most nunats rous, but where the Catholic interest is the greatest the 50/. freeholders were the most numerous. Ido not state these facts for the purpose of creating a distinction between the Protestant and Catholic interests, nor do I wish to set those two interests at variance with each other. I wish to slew that all interests will be fairly re presented, and if there is any one wish nearer to my heart than another, it is, that I may never again hear the terms of Protestant interest or Catholic interest. I no told that by this extension of the constituency; 1 am wishing to overthrow the Protestant interest I show that I can have no sueli desire; I wish to see all interests fairly represented, but 1 wish to overthrow the political power of those who, with religion on the one hand, and politics on tha other, inflime the minds of the people by their bigotry.—(Hear, hear.) I have now stated time only addition to be made with respect to the county I constituency. I will now address myself to the borough representation, in which we propose to melee a more ex tensive, but I trust it will not be considered an uncalled for change. I have been told that the whole strength of the Protestant interest depseded on the existence of seventeen or eighteen rotten boroughs. I will not believe that Protestant property, Protestant wealth, and Protes tant influence, will be deprived of their due share in the representation, by the non.existence of a few rotten boroughs. When the Union of Ireland was effected, it was argued by the Protestants that the measure was dangerous, for it would destroy the rotten boroughs, the only stay of Protestantism. Perhaps at that time it was so, for it might at that time have been necessary to continue and keep up the system of exclusion and of Pro testant ascendancy. But that day is gone by—time Catholic Emancipation Bill has passed, the system of general knowledge exists, and Catholic gentlemen are now admitted to sit in this House. When this semis urged to Lord Castlereagh, lie truly said, that if this altera tion were to take place in the Parliament of Ireland, the argument might held good—the Catholics might Re quire too great a preponderance; but it was to be re membered the countries were no longer distinct ; Ireland was now part of a great Empire represented. by one United Parliament; arid, therefore, that the Protestant Establish ment in Ireland would depend not on the roam boroughs, but on the sense and judgment and high feeling of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It was on this, too, that in these days Protestant institutions should rest, and not upon the remaining rotten boroughs. The fact I be.. lieve, that the large towns should have representation was. not disputed. Well, of the 31 boroughs there were 18 with less than the 100 electors—and of these 10 had a constituency of not more than 15—that was to say, no constituency at all. This was the system to which they had objected in England, and which they proposed to remedy in Ireland by following up the principle laid down at the time of the Union. Then there was very little difficulty in finding out the 31 best boroughs. The scale, however, was founded not on population but on taxation. It happened that the 25 highest in population were likewise highest in taxation ; but of the remaining seven some were as low as 57. Nor was the ratio a combined ratio of population and taxation, but of taxation alone, end that not very exactly taken. The principle, however, having been once agreed to in the Irish Hous e of Commons, they did not cavil about the details. There was, in fact, only one amendment proposed upon the Bill, and that was, that the borough of Mullingar should be substittned for that of Enniskillen—neither of them having any claim to representation whatsoever. He pro . posed, then, with regard to boroughs, to go upon a more equitable principle—the same that is pursued in England. Here the right of voting was to he extended to alt bona fide ten-pound householders ; in 'reliant there would be some difficulty in ascertaining this point. Ido not think aft be unreasonable topropose, that in the great towns will , . where there are local taxes, such as tor paving, lighting, &c., the individual should be obliged to show he had paid them up within the last half-year before he should be pri vileged to exercise the franchise. I do not speak of church cess or ministers' money, which might be hails to objection. In the counties of cities arid the counties of towns, which, in addition to the horougl', comprehended an agricultural district, I resolve to propose the coinbined right of the ten-pound householder in the towns, and the freeholder and leaseholder in the country, which I intend to add to the ten-pound voter of the tow!), and this with out depriving him of his vote for the county at large, thus retaining for him the double vote—that for the county and that for the town—which he enjoyed before. I have now gone through the main provisions of the Bill ; but there is one point to which it is my wish particu larly to allude, because it might lead to discussion on one side and on the other, since it departed from the principle now laid down in the English Bill : I allude to the pro vision in the English Bill by which the present right of freemen is made to descend for ever as heretofore. That precedent we do not propose to follow, because the free men in Ireland were an objectionable class of voters, al. though it was not so in England. The freemen in Ire , and were mixed up, not with political but religious quarrels. If they were simply persons who, by birth or sereil ude, or inhabitancy, had acquired their right of votiros, the same rule would apply to them as to the freemen of England ; but I do nut wish to perpetuate a race of Protestant free men, who were made freemen, not for any of the reasons I have mentioned, but because they were Protestants, and. thus belonging, as it was once supposed, to the only ileum which had a right to return Members. I propose then to retain actual and inchoate rights, hut not to continuum them, (This is as it was in the English Bill.) And this is the course which it is intended to pursue with r espect to the Catholic forty-shilling freeholders. We propose that they c e • forty-shilling freeholders shall be registered so lo n g ' continue in the same holdings. There is one other pre cedent in the English Bill we will not we do not mean to try the experiment of " :11 k o in r g ter i ming lY the number oin different f places at the same time, and days for taking it. We propose .to adhere to the existing system, extending it in th e details with respect to the lio- PRICE 7D.