The Sun. — London, England, 1814-12-19 00:00:00

1 MIIII..I.IIIMWWINAMMI.II I BOMBAY SEss JULY 16, 1.814. KIL4NG IN A DUEL. Cant, Archibald 'CattiPhell, Lieut. E. Robin son and Fetsign E. Marriott, all of the 74th Regi ment, were arraig. , ed for the murder .of Lieut. 'Edmund - Rus..ell, of the saute c irns„who was silo• thrt.agh the head in a duel, by Capt. Lieu! Robinson was second to the prisoner ; and 'Ensign Nlarriott to the tlec-ased., The cause of the misunderstanding which, led to this meeting, was stated to be as tolloWs :—On.t he utorniog o the 11th of June, the prisoner Campbell mi% garrison Captain at Fort St George; and it ._ way his d'uty to receive the guard reports from the OtE er•, .000ng xeltom was the deceased, who was tie guard at the Bazar Gate. He waited at the Apollo Gale halt an hour after receiving the other reports, for the arrival of that of Lieutenan Russell ; not receiving it, he dispatched the others to toe 1 own Major's Office, noticing at' the same time that one was omitted. He atter wards called at Cieui. Mussel's quarters, who re ceived'the visit civilly, and after some conversa— tion they parted atuitxtbly. On the evening of the same day, he met Lieut. Russell by accident, at Lieut. Robinson's quarters. The conversation commenced uy his inquiring of Lieut. Robinson if he had vet heard any thing respecting his re port, upon which the other in an abrupt and dis respeetftd manner said, ".It won'd be very odd if J shoad. 1 seut the report time enough. 1 sup . _ et- n the. way ; and the deummer! who took it, count not ►un you. _Lite pre— Boner replied, he was not out of the way ; - but he was not to stay there lialf an hour to wait for the report. • Lieutenant Russell said,' " in noticing the omission; Sir, .you have done your worst. I defy yoti." The prisoner said, " you speak 'to me with great violence and disrespect." Lieutenant RUssell replied, be did not, several times ; and upon the asser tion being repepted, he replied,. " I think, Sir,' you speak so to me." The prisoner appealed *to • those in the room, upon which LieutenautAnssell said,'' What business .havelron to come here at,td fell me you have reported me ?"Ifhis scene was terminated by Lieutenant Robinson asking Lieu tenant Russell Oat business he had to make' his quarters th, theatre of his attack upon ; his supe rior Officer. The, other then went away. Of the four Officers (Cochrane, Robinson, Marriott, and Laurie,) who Were present, the first two thought . an apology was due to the prisoner from Lieu. tenaot Russell, while the remaining two were of opinion, that nothing had passed requiring it.— Major Cheyne, upon hearing the_ representation crf all parties, _thought some concession repisite ;•• and Colonel Bland, the Commanding Officer, ad vised the Lieutenant to make it. He at first re fused ; but it was b aftert‘tirds arranged by Major Cheyne, that _mutual apologies, in the following form, should he exchanged :—" Captain Camp bell: , Mr. Russell, it was not my intention to irritate or offend you when I addressed you the other evening, inLientenantßobinson's quarters." Lieut. Russell: It was not my intention to treat you with disrespect,,or to offend you on that occasion ; and, it .1 did so, I am sorry for it." After having agreed to this apology, Lieut. Rus ,sell changed h.s mind, and wrote to Major Cherie, that as be had constantly denied any in tention of .treating Captain Campbell with insult or disrespect, he could not admit that he did ; but be would say, " I am sorry he' should think I did," instead of " 1 am sorry if 1 did so." Capt. Campbell saitl, the difference between words ex pressive of regret at a man's own conduct,' and words merely importing sorrow for another man's conception of that conduct, was so glaring,' that be could not accept the tendered alteration. The meeting was fixed for the morning of the 16th of June ; previously to which, the bleutenanu said to Adjutant Bangs, " I shall not die hippy till I have driven a bullet through - my opponent's body." On the first fire lie was' shot through' the head, -the ball passing through his - brains; He died in a few minutes: Captain Campbell . was slightly wounded. There being no evidence against Lieut. Robinson and Ensign Marriott, they were both acquitted. The Jury then returned a verdict-of Manslaughter against Captain Campbell, whom' they reetiiti mended to the Mercy-of the Court. life „Nage fined him - one rupee, and he was discharged. MURDER. • TRIAL AT CEYLON.--"Ott the. 15th of February tame on before the Supreme COttrt of Ceylon'the tri4l of Serjeant Williants;• the,l9th 'regiment, for the murder Of Elizabeth, his wife, by throw ing a knife at her on the evening Of Sunday, the 16th of January, which struck her on .her left side, and occasioned her death a fe , v days after. It appeared in evidence; that atter the prisoner Irad, committed the act 'he expressed his peni tence, and endeavoured to prevail . on his wife to say that she came by the . mound ' through accident. ; but, /befOre she died, she told • the truth, A Airs. Lambert ,deposed, that , the pri soner cam, to hi r, at Lieut.:Bagrut's about half 7, past 7 o'clock on Monday morning, and requ es t e d her to come over to his wife, for he believed that she had dmie for herself by falling over . a bucket with some knives and forks in her hand. The witness soon alter went over-; she saw the prisoner la menting over his . wife. The prisoner left the room. and witness seated herself in the chair he had quitetl. Atter he was . gone; the deceased said, " it is not as.he represented it : he hurled the 'knife aurae." The witness said, " Lord bless rue, what cont . ,' he do it for Mrs. W. replied, that she had genic for some bread on the Sunday even ing, and that he, , thinking she had been out too long, accused her of havin g been with some Officer. The prisoner returned, and sh e said no mote. • He' 500 after anis lett the room again, and s h e t h e , evq,,,sted witness , pot to tneritiou that he had done it, tit' atter she was dead. The whole of the evi dence b e ng gone through, and the prisoner hav• ing little to sa y i n his ditel iee, the Jury ret i re d , and, after being out nearly two hours au .d a h a lf, returned with a verdict of Guilty o f Culpable Ho ?nit*. The prison er wa s sentenced.to . be trans ported to N e w South Wales fof.the remainder bf kis natural life. Ler , INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERT, DEC. 17. THE PUBLIC THEATRES. MORRIS V. KIMBLE AND HARRIS. The • Judgment of the Court- was finally pro. on , iced in the following form LORD CHANCELLOR - 2 Fliere were two motions respecting the dispute between the. Proprietors of the little Theatre in the Haymarket and the Pro prietors of the great-Theatre in Covent-garden ; the one was to ili , sOlve an injunction against the Proprietors of Coveot-gardeu Theatre, with re ference to four dramatic pieces—The Agreeable Surprise, Village Lawyer, We Fly by Night, and X. K. Z.—lt was ao injunction wiii-li prevented the. Proprietors of Covent Garden Theatre, men and women, and George Colman, Esq. from per forming, or causing to ,be performed, the pieces I have mentioned, or any other of the dramatic pieces of G. Coftwom . The injunction was moved tor after •it had happened that . under particular cireumstances one of these pieces, The Agreeable Surprise, had been performed at Covent-garden Theatre. The Proprietors of Covent-garden Theatre, or such Of them as attend, seem to have had an opinion that 'the injuoctiou did not prevent their performing The Agreeable Surprise; and having advertised it representation, the interposition of those who thought themselves called upon to interpose was not in time to pre vent its. being a serioas inconvenience,' not ,to play that part of the .oerformance so announced. ri . he . Proprietors of Covetit-garden Theatre seem - to ,•••-: 41,....1, 5 0i Lim; - firisttlotAl.n Itiii not extend to that entertainment, ai_ it was .not mentioned in the proliihrfor y part of the writ of injunction, and. , that they . had a right to perform it by reason of ' its iincientiv and the fact of its having been per formed at other Theatres. I . trail still of opinion 1 drat attending to the whole of the writ of it - ditt:3- ; tiOn, it clearly extends to prevent the perform ' ance of the tour compositions, which , are all spe cifically mentioned in - the body of ; the writ, and that the Word-," hcreinbefore mentioned" clearly apply to them all. The, material question was to have that point settled There was another com tlaint. It was stated, that the general words i which were supposed to Coinprehend all that Mr. Colman had- cotnposed, or ever should compose, were words which were Much too general in a writ of injunction, 1 atn'of opinion, that with respect to every one of the parties hut Mr. Colman, they are so—for how are the Proprietors of Covent garden Theatre to he acquainted with the fact, that the new-pieces presented to them are not the or idoctions of the persons who present them, but are the fruits of the genius of Mr. Colman. 1 think Ii would be too much to, plate the Proprietors of Covent-garden Theatre tinder the harrow of a writ of injunction, so general in its terms, and there:- fere if a case arises respecting any other Composi tion made the subject of dramatic representation, in violation of the rights of the Proprietors of the Haymarket Theatre, that case must be stated, and a fresh writ of injunction piayed for.-- To a certain extent, diet), toe motiou for dis solving the injunction has: succeeded. On the other hand, a mUtion• was made by Mr. Morris, not meaning that it should succeed in time terms of it, but making, use of the only terms by which he conctied he could obtain what under his agreement.with Mt. - Colman, he thought he had. a right to as .Proprietor of the Haymarket 'lleaire. His motion was, thartwo Gentlemen, Mr. Harr s and Mr. Kemble, s;otil he committed 'to the Fleet Prison, for having ,violated the In jimetion, b y performing the entertainment called The Agreeable Surprise. As to M.r. Harris, he may be considered as l having given directions for the performance, but in saying this, : I am quite sure.lie-had - no idea of violating, or meant to vio late the Injunction. As 'to Mr. Kernble, there was t peri(nrn• InterpOsition of ,his. 1 do not to;H x , ,• i I co.k 1 am speaking ,correctly, that it not being one m.• his awn nights, he even koew .The .Ireeaile Surprise was to be performed. But atten .mg, to ,11, distinction between the words " pertormipg," and '' caosiog to ,be performed," I,apprehend that it after this injunction, the Pro prietors of Covent-garden Theatreoilace the per formances under the int-wag - meat of Mr. Thomas Harris, or Mr. Henry Harris, and.they select the property of tie Haylliarkt - heatre for repre sentatioh, they must he considered as " causing" these thingS to he performed.—Mr. Hart makes this objection, He sap, this is a motion to-commit for performing, awl not for causing to be per formed, and he says that it he had had notice of the motion in this form, he 511 0 , 'lld have had a de fence.' This seemed to he- a surprise, lama whe ther an agreeable:one or not, I will not undertake to say. The real queetiop is, whether these words, " causing to he performed," are words that mean alifferent acts; or _tv-kether they are words of tautology ; I am dot afraid of incurring the censure of the world, when I say, that this .Court is pretty much in the habit of using words of tautology, and ' therefore perfectly capable of judging what are .so. I think I can dispose of this satisfactdrily When_you look at au injunt ti n that prevents you (rout '' perforMing, or -causing to be performed," certain pieces, in order to' determine whether it means two distiuct acts, or the same, you must look to the perons who are to perform, and what is the act they are to per form,- or cause to be performed. I apprehend it is impossible, in the fair sense of- the word, to say that Mr. Harris, or Mr. Kenible, or any other Proprietors who 'have no theatrical character, can perform The Agreeable Surprise. Certain indivi duals may perform ceitain . parts, but how any one ,person can violate. an Injunction by performing The Agreeable Surprise, 1 cannot conjecture. I remember to have seen a play-bill, in which it was announced, that Mr. Bannister, a Gentleman tof a verr versatile genius, was to perfortn every :part. Mr. Bannister might do so, but Ida not isee how Mr. Harris or Mrs. Anne Somebody and •the: other Proptietors can, be restrained in any .other sense than in causing ..,0 be performed. I null the more confirmed in this, because in the af fidavits of Mr. Harris and Mr. Kemple, they state -that in performing The Agreeable SUrprise, which they adinit they did not mean to viol ate an y in junction, there maybe cases to which doing and causing a thing to done niay- have a different meaning - ? but J. think, recollecting who the per sons are, and the thing to be. done that these, words are chargeable with tautology. The \great question is respecting these four . fardes. They certainly are not to be acted unless the injunction is dissolved. On the first motion, the injunction I have reformed ; as to the Tatter there has - been a violation of the injunction, bnt withOut.any in tention to violate, it, and .therefore the. best way of settling this dispute, and of restoring harmony betWeett the two theatres, is to say that there shall be no costs on either'side. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Dec. 17. SMITH, PAY NE B AND . smmj, MURCOTT AND OTHERS. In this action the plaintiffs, whOare Bankers in London:: sought to recover the amount of a forged bill of exchange, drawn by a person of the name .qf Temple upon Mr. Evans, a. navy agent, and made payable at the praintiffs' banking-house. The bill in question was indorsed to, the defen dants, and a. valuable. consideration given fOr it by them at their Bank in Tunbrifte. They after wards sent it for payment to . the plaintiffs, by whom it was paid. The forgery being discovered, and the plaintiffs demanded back the MOney they had paid. The defendants resisted the demand, and hence arose the present action, The Lord CHIEF JuSiltE, considering "the questiou too difficult to be then decided,•recom: mended that the facts might be formed into a case, and argued hereafter. This was agreed to, and a verdict was taken subject to a case. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BO W-STR EET. ROBBERY OF MISS BRODERICK'S HOUSE. —WC stated a short-time that a man answering the description of Joseph King, the journeyman carpenter of Little Britain, who was suspected of being the robber who broke open the house of the Hon. Miss Broderick, of Grosvenor-place, who was shot by the Lady's butler, was in custody at Birmingham, where he applied for. relief-at the General Hospital, in consequencg,of the numerous wounds which he had received in his right thigh, side, and cheek. From the nature.of the wounds, and the fell particulars of the robbery, and the description of the robber, which appeared in the London Newspapers, they had no doubt at the Hospital but he was the man who was suspected, and when his wounds were in a sufficient•state for him to be removed, without endangering his life, he was conveyed .to the prison in Birmingham, where the.surgeons belonging to the Hospital at tended him till his woupds were sufficiently reco vered for hill; to travel to London, to answer the charge.' On Saturday morning he arrived, and was brought to the Office in the-evening, in 'the custody of Adkins the Officer, anti he tioderweilt a long examination before Mr.BIRNIE. The prisoner is 'a'coniplete cripple in consequence of the wounds which l►e received; and- is obliged to walk nearly double, and then with the assistance of a staff: he was allowed a chair-to sit at the Bar. Villiam Payne,- the.. High Constable of Bir mingham, deposed, that on Saturday the 26th ult. having heard that there was a strange man in their General Hospital who was wounded, who he thoug t answered the description of the man he had real of in the London Newspapers, who had been shot in the house of the Hon. Miss Bro derick, he caused him to be removed from the hospital to the prison, where he told him the sus picion he had against him ; to which the prisoner, without any hesitation, cquiesseit that he was the man, but denied having. committed any robbery ; he got • into the house, but did not' carry any thing laway with him; Mr. 131aNIE asked him if he wished td say any thing. He replied he had nothing to say, as he had been sworn to, but requested to know what was to be done- with his wounds ? to,which he was told a proper surgeon world- attend him in Newgate, to which prison he was committed for trial. . BITING A No . William Underwood, Coach man to General Grant, Grosvenor-square, was charged with biting off a part of the note of Mr. Bird, landlord of the King's Arms, Duke-street, Grosvenor-square, who stated, that dominos were being played at in his hOuse on Friday evening, when he interfered, and said it was a shame the .game was allowed, and that prosecutor ought to be informed against`; in consequence of which a dispute arose, and prosecutor desired prisoner to suit the house, which he refused. Prosecutor in sisting on it, prisoner resisted, and seized prose cutor's nose with his teeth, notwithstanding the intreaties of a•bye-stander, and completely bit the lower part of the nose off.—The prisoner was or dered to find bail to answer for his conduct at the • - Sessions. SHOPIAFTING. ,-- Yesterilaq Mary Anne Taylor was charge() by Mr. White, corner of Newcastle street, Strand, linen-draper, with going into his shop under pretence of ordering goods, to the amount of 5/. 2s. to be sent to the Rev.' Mr. Rig by, No. 15, Lincoln's-inn-fields. After the pri soner left the shop, Mr. White, having some su. spicion, followed her to Mr. Lacy's, hosier, corner of tlement's-inn; where she went in, and the in formant waited till she came out, and still watched her to Little Quern -street, where he stopped her and cl,ar g en her with stealing from his shop. She replied, she had not ; then, said he, if not from me, you have stolen Something- from Mr. Lacy's, and conveyed her to his house : on searching her, three pair of valuable silk hose were found on her person, which Mr.l,,,acy swore to,. and she was fully committed. The prisoner was elegantly dressed in black, with a hand Some lace veil, and h a d *ll t h e. appearance DI a woman of fashion. She represented herself as the wife of an Officer in his Majesty's service, now on duty abroad, and that, wishing IQ return to Ireland, induced her to do what she had done. John Lauder, a baker, of Hind-street, Man chester-NH:ire, Was convicted in the penalty of 31. for having, a numberof loaves found in his Shop deficient in weight 60 ounces, which were seized by and others belonging to the Of fi ce, in consequence an. information. Liwberick of HATTON-GARDEN. 13AKIIS. - George Larton, A baker, residing in Cursitor-street, Chancery-lane, was changed with having some improper ingredients iur t° la' n , t ri n ii,aii i t l e y ti.im.e st o l g t:ttici, be with his ;•ife and out, and ' . t 1113 t 11 t I'll article as produced ; and was of 1 1, r nns irf °, ai baker t ' lured i l o 7 l l l o . sE eysaad warranted wv:34iskueissetuefcrrioit:oashpiestit: rs 6°' him Q. to answer to a charge made by t he r je e„ P , P r• e i ; l 3,o; t ( wi p: , ri k s t 1‘1.:, e eeps a chandler -shop , 'u t ' esrtn .: ,, t e r e ool e oi t :: f t Pare n four i l l e. ) e h e :s o l : i s t: n : c v e n s ; thr her lt e . q lnao l tn i . a id : e t :K e ilie r eg ‘ l aHd throia,6l:_ti.kkh the e e n b e 2i il) t sleeping G l l se al: : mitigated, penalty of per oaac-i The liread was forfeited. Thomas 41ey, -9 T u h E oTos -s C cl a U ss A d it , E L:n d Charies tr e°P(ll; ley, three mere lads, but app 0 0 were lir- o 'i':,‘ nected with reputable friends, by two of the Constables of St. 11.larti.:,', :Ptv,:i !melon of being thieves.--The Th e e o nstau%,:firr' l ,, • f o . tl l ey lads, rentices, ',., -I t ,obt„, and the distressing representation was e ",,,,irriT by many of the neighbours, , that thes e P a giri s ti as well as abandoned Yn n , r4 lo °.- nl6ftly assembled in a wretched hov e " obV: Round-court, Strand, which had beeinnac:for,tilc; house, but was now even•without a clop purpose of drinking coffee, and plan ning 5 . e P ilici of . depredation. The wretc h e dues t s h : f ie :a a i t i s s e i l , id as r m _ i _ l e ic t si s rgt o oel i sdi l ts e l t ol*t l 'ileli t ell o lym b. t o l ei t ' i cpno,i ; ine l ‘ a 6sv c eri e io , pfei(cib'kr pi(7okhcsk: en ta .s" 'Ol f bl'l's ell s sr s ni:e r s a s,: n .n d ,vg m r,e::,. . tcsr i i l ei e 3:t i iii, ; :,; p yy, e ,ika c liea t i l pt( l ii i t il titol l i. y italin ' i a tiliv i itt a it ' , l: oo t i e ie d tooial t : tiitglie : be l: l _ o ' l l e iiirli V lris r liv : oo 4 !:l lions aea:a4l, " .,;te.ei t n a li t t: e isea, o ,un f itineli a ja l icl a iaoi r s t s ti u d i l l ir t i i i i i e g c t o h i e l ;:ig fo b r t i b f y no th a e : etil b ov i d t . It was dangerous Or t-0,00.0-' ~ f l rie nu t rubers. h ie(i e ll a ne p :iv p re e er a d r bs a tch n r:e c appearance o uo t ii.psc % tit ' a a toi t il.. :_ i l ei : ns l , i c i h o f il / ' said e" the s; constables Mr. FLBLD . 40CP ; o f° ING was surprised that , - 4 i§t';yl receptacle had been allowed to e- . 0 se l , hour, y person that they Wrightand f*r tl • its purpose to have the assist ° Officers if ' . it wen- required.' ti the acts Nothing - •• ' suspicious being fund , (3- d'5 0.9 ,, - co mi hereafter ii c n e (l ol ° fri ner d s, they were handed over to thei r l ye P ° o lj and On being dischargetippep the should e p Ist to Round-court. ele:t.:::er. es:: ered ti:boeinersi ruiltdts::: ai t inl i gticiolpl jr jo e ti s ,rs ° :, ° ,o (setre:oloivii:sebileigrbfialleita The following transaction .took place in Faline u tli r>N r s. b , : i ti , - . f 0 6.- o p of 'unfortunate and , ~,„ AV the night Wednesday, 7tb ins ta l ., ll ;/ . :ii. 1) " " )1 heat, n of Richard K en were-4W° men and am - •;, e so- t o m r. Kt enWe,-Thomas James, 0(14; f es, 0 , stated . t T h e lr ewer w ere hailed l.e returning from ie S t : t ti t s : ic 1 1: 11 ~.___Flushing, between the hours .of .B,;ailio o' l3 ' 0 ,aiting for a reply, p,ursued . by another. boatAcerrill 'werei' e Y were c four nstont- blouse Officers , th e - " it ' }ilt Painter, one of the . Officers, the shor f1.°119 i° 1 eittered the body of ThornaJantes, o hoo t 1 1, . tb, above the navel and went out at his b6lilil l tel. after t f e lt i n O t e ffi d Officersany smuggled then searched -the hoar, but ° t oot( smuggled goods, left thew arid ")",i,00,i3 James apistol sevilasPti'red by schicco. did not immediatel y . find he No s WO', ~J soontsiol,l9A.ritiay; Kempe, that he believed he ‘ 11.15 ,... 1 a1 e ' %1 1 c ; e r b had awdaslecfotnt:el e y i: l e ii ° 111:e 0 1 t: :i i : ,l (t o le(' abont seventeen hours a fte r . F li ,l e -t i• ' Coroner's eother of the 04ieers have ,ahscon-c:ertlitPif inquest having returned 3 1 " A ge li l o Wilful T Marder,, the two other Officers:a' to committed lo the County Gaol of 130 (1113-'_ ,.. 1 their trials for the murder ,s a as: I. .a. 111(11 Li,. • _.......................... °1 4" ii, METEOROLOGI CA LL°l/1_,..----''' O P . We 3 I Thermomete I r. I,_ -1 , ''; I• .-:' • 4 h " .5. - i a 4 -a 't . l . -. P . l;l' i • . ,--: a , a> a; 4 , c' , :: a, , d ca CP'• f "Dec. - 0 . • u inches , a Cow •,,, ',..,,,. 3 33 •34 36 33 30.09 s lull' J ip ,, i 4 40 37 45 35 29.70 "‘ I)''' 0 04. ' 5•3736 41 34 ,65 .Ol fair fl a p a . ,G 36 37 39 36 30.19 pi oi c ' 7 3a 39 42 36 .15 •?„, 7 Pc' ' 8 45 50' 53 48 29.90 ' :' -- IP' 9 • 50 46 53 33 .60 (lb .........---- .51 _. .. A ,! , f ' i I'o l / '4 4 ' Rain in the 'Morning ? Fair 3ft` h ird' 111RTHS. Gloticester ; On the 15th inst. at Darlington; . 11 Hon. Mrs. Codringtan, of a canghte r • At Whitehall, the wife of Jo'sep) Ph'' daughtet. 4r4 fo r ' / - ' A . nell t 0 ' . On the 7th inst. J ames 44 • d Lly E s q . - ' c ,pt i/l i l Hospitals, th.ced 59. in °. s '.. r Ou the it;6l: St'lneiuller, at the I , le• ("` " ' • 3"ce' 0 I r / fitti Allen, of his Majrsty' f p 1-Ill'PY' r o fel, At ° ' On' the '27i ii lilt: the tsuls-i.liAiiit:t leas 3 ,- .° v , it . the Right ' un. 1..ii1l ..lz• -I . g r• li thi "le :•(`)th `1"•)er, •:1111''aiiilt.itoy:il, 13n'aicl" CV S.in• ii, .irsi extra Girth in tl •:Docklard• ~toVr ! ,iil i cec l l, l) ( u )f rt L l i t i :,;: , , , .1 , i s t t n , ai , on file 2 it" 11f • t 4 G4l' It sc" who stiot Ca r ,it 4iii'Stit Y ck s p s n ' l l e il iti laredUel I- . • / .......• .., t:fr , >O . l' PSDON : Printed l)k "j. :i. C.'l.lo`l ‘,, l i z it iV)PS , ° A ,i ':i '' buildings ; an t i l a t laghed the lc:A , '', -- wher e 3 ,ld Vi at tli , ' s'uN-OFFice, 3 it pc wents, Orders, Letters (Post-paid)) :- . ' c ' —l.l '4,10 '1 ( ;;c ' • 1 1 . t, ' , it,.' /' • 1 ;'