The Sun. — London, England, 1822-05-29 00:00:00

THE LONDON JOURNALS. tX7RACTS FROM THE. Dk 1 I.Y" MORNING PAPtILS, MOS/ 29, IS(2`2. [THE TIMES.I The surmise of truth, which we reluctantly at tached on Friday to a paragraph copied from an American Paper, purporting to give an account at au affray between the crew of one of our men of war in China and a party of the natives, has been unhappily confirmed in all its distressing circumstances, and with- all its alleged conse quences, by the arrivals of yesterday. The de tails which we have collected, and on the au thenticity of which, unfortunately, no doubt can be thrown, will put our readers in full possession of the state of matters when the last accounts came away. We hope, from a view of the mag nitude of the interests involved in the dispute, that our intercourse with China is merely sus pended, and that means wilt - speedily be found of adjusting our differences, without sacrificing national honour, en. 'leaving any remains of lurking distrust. We cannot at the same time forget the repulsive prejudices, the unsocial habits, and the absurd pride which characterize the rulers and the subjects of the " Universal Empire"—that they allow us to trade with them by sufferance—that they look upon themselves as independent of our commerce—and that if they give us tea for our manufactures of our metals, yet that we are to have the humility to consider them our masters, and the gratitude to regard them as our benefactors. On such a people, who cannot he compelled to respect us by the display of our force, or induced to trade with us by sense of reciprocal benefit, we have no hold but by prudent regard to our Nvants and their prejudices. The Dutch enjoyed their fa vours, and forfeited them. We hold our trade by a precarious tenure. [NEw TimEs.] It is admitted on 'all hands that the French Elections have turned out favourably to the Royalists. The Liberal Papers console them selves with the assertion that the minority of re presentatives was chosen by the majority of Con stituents. How true this may be we know not ; hut it appears by our private letters that the Ministers, at the opening of the Session, will have less to fear from their old antagonists the Liberals, than from the divisions among their own sup porters. The want of energy is the fault most complained of in the present Administration. — For our own part, we should have been sorry to see them adopt violent measures on their en trance into office ; • but the weakness of rewarding and encouraging their opponents is still more to be blamed. There is much lalk. at Paris of a letter written by an in- dividual of great celebrity, to the French Ministers, on the danger of leaving so many of their decided enemies in possession of - the highest places in the State; and it is expected that, in the new organisation of the Treasury, which will take place in the beginning of June, M. be Villele will avail himself of the opportu nity to get rid of a number' of Liberaux, who have long occupied situations in that department. The success of the liberal faction in the elections for Paris has given them so much confidence that they talk of a grand solemnity early in June, to commemorate the death of young Lallemand, who happened, to be killed in the ! lots of June 1820. The Minister of the Interior, however, is said to be resolved to prevent any public meet ing of the kind ; and as he has the.reputation of firmness, the Liberals will no doubt be daunted and give up their enterprise. [BRITISH PRESS.] A considerable sensation was excited yester day at the East India House and the Stock Ex change by the arrival of the Farquharson, from China, with an account of the stoppage of the British trade with China, in consequence of an affray between part of the crew of the Topaze frigate and some Chinese, in which two of the latter were killed. This affair took place the 25th of December, and was announced in the American Papers received a few days since. It is now eagerly seized upon at the Stock Exchange, and has furnished &delightful speculation to the friends of war. A brave man, they know, will find cause of quarrel in a straw when honour is at stake, and they would fain persuade the world that hos tilities with the mighty Emperor of China are in evitable. This is dreadful news to the tabbies of the tea-table, to whom it will prove a fruitful source of gossip and alarm for the threatened loss of their souchong and bohea. but we exhort them to be comforted and to dismiss their fears. The money and goods with which our trade furnishes China are much more valuable and necessary to it than its' tea is to England, which, if the trade ere to coninue stopped, would be of no more value than so much bad hay. The mighty Em, peror may be in a passion, and the sacrifice of one of their sailors which the Americans lately made to his vengeance, may encourage him to bluster and swagger with us on the present oc casion, but he will trot be likely to turn away so good a customer, and proceed to extremities upon such provocation. [MORNING CHRONICLE.] ' Rumour, 'with its hundred tongues, is cur.: rently propagating a story which, even with all that we have lately witnessed in the way of pro fusion and extravagance, at a time when an over whelming taxation pres'es so hard upon the country, we own ourselves unwilling to credit. We insert the particulars, however, as the coun try is-deeply interested in the subject, that an opportunity may he afforded of contradicting them, if they should not be true.—Some time back, in consequence of whispers about trans actions not beneficial to the interests of the State, Lord L— humbly communicated to .a , Great Personage, that a certain confidential si tuation ought no longer to be held by an irre sponsible individual, nay, that it was kid's pensible the office should be abolished altogether.. There was nothing, assuredly, very pleasing in this lipid and daring language. That exalted personage protested against an interference with what he deemed especial prerogative, but quite ineffectually, for the Noble Lord stated the dis missal in question to be a sine qua non with his continuance in office. After much discussion, the point was at length yielded, and the Right Hon. Baronet prevailed upon to retire. Not, however, before the Great Personage had be stowed upon him substantial marks of his grati tude for services done and performed. Fourteen thousand pounds were presented to the, exile in cash, in addition to a pension of 2,000 pounds per annum granted for life, together with the emoluments attached to the office of Privy Purse, which he stipulated to hold, with a salary of two thousand pounds a year annexed to it, and a promise of the reversion of a choice of any Foreign 'Mission that might happen to fall in. Not, however, content with these multiplied ap propriations of splendour and gain, he vehe mently pressed his claim for an English Peerage, which, report states, Ministers refused to sanc tion. The highest Personage in the State, con scious that n'o evil could arise from tranquillizing the mind of the Ex-Secretary, condescendingly endeavoured to soothe him by the offer of an Irish Peerage, to which the Ministers gave their concurrence ; but, strange as it may seem, the Right Hon. Baronet is said to have refused this. *„,* We insert the above article, but from what we have pre viously heard, we are not inclined to give the least credit to it, and the manner in which the individual alluded to mentioned is, we are assured, uncandid and unjust, as he is not of a cha racter likely to be unreasonable in his hopes or pertinaceous in his requisitions. [MORNING HERALD.] The most horrible details of the progress of starvation among the people in different parts of Ireland are given in the Irish Journals. In stances are related of the instinct of life struggling against hunger, by resorting to truly shocking substitutes for food ; and in other instances the bodies of the starved creatures are borne un coffined to the grave. The universal liberality, and promptness with which their wretched state is taken up in this country, is an event which should be remembered here with pride, and will, we are sure, be remembered in Ireland with the liveliest gratitude ; and, no doubt, the succour in money and provisions, which has been sent over, has come between many a human creature and tt)e horrors of death by starvation. But, as we have said before, the state of suffering is still dreadful from starvation and disease ; and there are yet nearly three months between the wretched suf ferers and a supply. We perceive that the per sons having property in some parts of Ireland have formed associations to improve, permanently, the condition of the poor, by directing them in the employment of their labour on the soil, and by encouraging industry. If they are disposed, as no doubt they are, not only to improve the state of the Irish poor, but what is equally important, to make Ireland a more efficient in tegral part of the United Kingdom, they should adopt, almost implicitly, the system which connects the labourer and his employer— the land-tilrer and the landowner in England. It would be very much to their own interest. One of the causes of the wretchedness of the peasantry, and one of the reasons why the landlord fre quently loses his rents is, that he lets the land at a rack-rent to a tenant,who,from want of capital, and from the perpetual pressure of a screwed-up rent, cannot procure the necessary portion of labour or the requisite supply of the implements of husbandry to make the land as productive as it might be. [MORNING POST.] Mr. Denman, as Common Serjeant, for the first time, took his seat on the Judicial Bench, at the Old Bailey, on Monday. The novelty of the circumstance, together with the peculiar con siderations which have unexpectedly raised Mr. Denman to the Judgment-seat, and the impor tance of the case which came before him, on 'onday, will excuse us for adverting par ticularly to what took place.—Whatever might be our opinion of the propriety of electing this Gentleman to his present situation—what- ever might be the itnpolicy a priori of combining in one person the office of making and adminis tering law, contrary to the fundamental rule of the Constitution with respect to other Judges— whatever might be the indiscreetness of electing a, violent political partizan for an impartial dispenser of justice—Mr. Denman will not find that, since he has been elected Common Serjeant, we shall be deficient in due respect to him \ as a Judge of the Land. Besides the sacred regard which we have for the administration of the laws, other considerations dictate this line of conduct to us. The Comumn-Serjeant of the City of London will always perceive that the correct discharge of his judicial duties is utterly incom patible with a concurrent active, to say nothing of an intemperate, political life. The Judges of this country have to perform their exalted func tions itLthe face of a moral and enlightened people, and under the controul of a public opinion, into which the nicest sense of propriety and the purest conception of abstract justice are incor porated with the liveliest attention to national welfare and reputation. It is, we therefore think, impossible that any man, though chosen for mere party rashness, can continue the same reckless career of politics after his elevation to the Bench as before it. Nothing could be more scandalous or indecent than for a man to prejudge constitutional and legal questions, even by silent votes in the douse of Commons, which are afterwards to come before him in the grave capacity of a dispenser of impartial justice. Mr. Denman of course sees this glar ing inconsistency of his present concomitant si tuations and presuming on these grounds that Air. Denman will in practice obviate many of those powerful objections to his late election which were a priori absolute disqualifications, we shall consider him in the mere character of Com mon Serjeant, and respect him accordingly. In the Court of Common Pleas 7 New York, a cause of assault and battery was tried, in which CHARLES BUONAPARTE was the defendant. He is stated to be of the same family, and no very distant relation, of the B u ONAPARTE who was so famous for his assaults and batteries. He was found guilty, and adjuged to pay six cents. damages, NAVIGATION LAWS, &c. On Mr. WALLACE'S and Mr. ROBINSON'S BILLS, NAVIGATION LAWS, &c. &c. To the Right Honourable THOMAS WALLACE, Vice-President of the Board of Trade. Silt, —By the public prints of this day you are made to say, in answer to Mr. ROBINSON'S ob servations on your Bill, (which infringes on our venerable and useful Navigation Laws) that you felt rather surprised at his saying the landed and manufacturing interests had any thing to do with, or could be affected by, that Bill, or words to that effect.—Now I am not surprised at this de claration, as it only goes to confirm me in my former opinions, that you never knew the con nexion of our several British interests, or the effects of your own well meant though ruinous measures, nor of the mighty resources of the British Empire, or of that system of commerce and finance that I have so often named to you, and which is so necessary to bring those resources into action for the public good ; but you believed commerce and manufactutes were, balloon-like, unconnected with other British interests; and I further perceive, that from the lively interest which certain persons connected with foreign trade take in promoting your measures, that the roots and general bearings of them are seldom (for the public good) deliberated on.—Thus, like a man who abandons his own virtuous wife for a harlot that proves his ruin, do your measures destroy British for a foreign trade that will ul- Ornately ruin the nation. It is that portion of your Bill permitting the products of continental Europe to be carried in foreign vessels to any port or ports in Europe not British, and' allowed to be warehoused, re shipped or transhipped directly on board native or English vessels, as well as that part which puts English and foreign on an equal footing in the ports of their respective nations, that I object to. Now, Sir, to any one who knows the effects of our American treaties, or may be capable of cal culating the difference of building, equipping, and navigating Danish, Swedish, and Prussian ships, (Russian ships I know but little of); still I see no' reason why they should not navigate still cheaper, as Russia possesses the elements and requisites for cheap navigation, when compared with the building, navigating, &c. of English ships, the difference of expence in foreign ports and warehouses, all arising out of our national debt and expenditure. This knowledge every President and Vice-President of our Board of Trade ought to possess, or they must depend on selfish men for such information, and which is not always correct; he would immediately perceive that all the products of countries beyond the limits of Barcelona on the one side, and Copen hagen on the other side of Europe, would pay to be brought to Rotterdam, Antwerp, and other convenient ports on the other side of the channel, in foreign vessels, warehoused there until wanted for our market, and then, or on arrival, trans shipped in British or native vessels at about 1-3rd the freight which is paid from the place "of their production. I don't know what number of tons of British shipping are now so employed, nor do I care, for my present purpose as principle (not detail) is only necessary for State questions ; if a single ton should be so employed, it is enough for my purpose; but without doing more than referring to the recollection of the common occurrences of my life, I think, if I say there are 200,000 tons employed in furnishinc , us with supplies from countries beyond the aforesaid limits, that I am not far wrong; still I will calculate, for argument sake, that only 50,000 tons of British shipping shall be deprived of profitable employment by your Bill; this alone would be sufficient to deter those who love their country from proceeding further with such a Bill. With respect to what relates to putting our shipping on a footing with other countries, I contend that the industry of the world should be protected according to its value to that State to which it belongs, that would en title the ships of England to large protecting duties. As the great object I have in view is to shew you how the Manufacturing and Landed Inte rests are connected with your Bill, I shall leave other questions as much as possible out of sight. I presume you will allow, Sir, triat there is not a Calling in the United Kingdom (I say, owing to our unwise laws preventing our doing our own work with our own people,) but what has more people than it can employ,—consequently, every man deprived of employment by your or any other Bill, must fall on the Landed Interest, through the Poors'-rate. Now, according to my calculation, whether right or wrong, as I said before, I care not, as State questions have no thing to do with detail, still I will stake 1001. that I am rather under than over the mark ; that every 100 tons of British Shipping, when pro fitably employed, is the means of giving employ ment to 12 British subjects, as builders, equip pers, manufacturers, sailors, &c. &c. They, again, give sustenance to the like number' of British families, more than if we employed Fo reign shipping to do the same work.—This, on the trifling number of 50,000 tons of British Shipping, and say 1,000 men as employed in our warehousing interest, would amount to about 7,000 in number, and they, with their families, at 201. per man and family, would cost the Land ed Interest, through the Poors'-rate, equal to 140,0001. per annum ; add to which the loss of Customs and the cost of Paupers occasioned by those Shipping being deprived of profitable em ployment,—the people of those Shipping, as well as those depending on them, would also expend one half more in excise articles, when employed, than when Paupers. Thus we may reckon the loss of revenue at least 100,0001. per annum—also a loss of National wealth and political power ; for not one of those new created foreign ship ' builders, sailors, warehousemen, &c. &c., but what will in time of4war fight against us ;—say for this loss 100,0001. per annum. Our manufacturers will now only get hall (where they used to get whole) customers ; add to these their consequences,—charge only for them 100,0001. per annum. Thus, on the mode rate calculation of your Bill depriving only 50,000 tons of British Shipping of profitable em ployment, (the quantity I fear will be treble) then the account will stand thus : DR.—The consequences of Mr. Wallace's Bill to the British Empire. To the Landed Interest, for the cost of maintaining 7,000 paupers and their families, at £2O per fa mily - - . - - - To do. for the loss of customers, and a further in crease of paupers occasioned thereby, - To the Manufacturing Interest, for loss of Custo mers, about - - - - Loss of Revenue, about - . • National Wealth, and Political Power, about Loss to the Shipping Interest, about - - I will have you to add what it will cost to batten down this new power all are creating. I conceive that if Mr. Robinson's two Bills relative to the West India and American Intercourse Trades pass into a law,' that they will, in addi tion to the above, cause an annual loss to the British Empire, and affect the several Interests above stated, equal to about £140,000 60,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 £600,000 2,400,000 £3,000,000 Thus the serving foreigners without their re ... urning a single equivalent to Englishmen, will be an annualloss of about 3 , 000 , 000 per annum I hope that every Englishman will do his endea vour to frustrate the passing of such injurious Bills. The East India Company's Charter, the Ame rican Treaties, the alteration in the Timber Dit ties, Mr. RoßlNsoN's two West India Trade Bills, and the want of due protection to our ge . neral industry, are and will be in the whole of twenty times greater loss to the country than the Bills in question. I am sorry the superciliousness of men in power should prevent their taking good counsel from dis interested and experienced men when offered gra tuitously, and which might have convinced them of the errors of our present commercial measures before they had produced their present baneful consequences; as well am I sorry that you did not summons me= to give evidence, as I requested, before the Foreign Trade Committee, as I think I could have prevented one half of their errors. You should know that a large portion of foreign trade, while our people are unprofitably employed, is a criterion of national decay ; and that the profitable employment of our people (without reference to foreign trade) is the true criterion of national prosperity ; our present circumstances prove this position. If in passing your Bill you contemplate serv ing the British shipping interest (as you professed to do when you altered the timber duties) would it not be better for you to wait the solicitation of that interest, and not press on its members these good things (as you call them) against their will ; for, as plain common, sense practical men they cannot conceive how you can benefit their inte rest by giving the employment of their ships to foreigners more than you did by our East India Charter, our baneful American trea ties, and alteration of the Timber Duties. If a person so stupid exists, as not to know that agri-. culture is the root of and propelling power to all our.other industry, let him just ask himself whe. ther agriculture, manufactures, or commerce ex• isted first ? Of Course that which first existed mus' be the root of what grew out of it; let him also ask himself if every other class of society are not either the factors, carriers or labourers of, or pensioners on, the landed interest ; but, Sir, I am aware of that arduous task which every one has to perform, who undertakes to convince such men of their errors, as could wait till the table of the House of Commons was nearly broken down with Agricultural Petitions, before they knew of the agricultural distress, or appointed a Committee to ascertain its state ; while the pro found Statesman, knowing the price of corn, and comparing it with the cost of production, would have given relief before a single petition could be presented ; as well do I know the difficulty of convincing those of their errors Nfvho could boast of the great benefit derived to their coun try by the exchange of 55 for 35 millions of commodities (say we also received some bul lion, and which was unaccounted for ; this on the average of years cannot much exceed three millions sterling, as our animal consumption is only about that sum) that our branches of in dustry were in a state of prosperity, while their roots were acknowledged to be in a state of decay ; who could also state, under such circum stances, that our revenue was in a prosperous or increasing state, while this year of a sound pro duction it falls short of from 10 to 15 millions sterling. Who could state that over-production was the cause of our distress, while from a less breadth of tillage, and after an injured and but middling crop of corn, we had 1-6th more po pulation to feed and clothe than in 1815, and while a large portion of the Empire was short of provisions, and the people supported by the bounty of their countrymen; and who could say that our Shipping Interest (the bulwark of the State) was too numerous, and that steps would be taken to diminish them ? It was the wisdom of our forefathers to protect British Com merce from foreign competition : it is the folly of our present worthies to destroy British, and to protect foreign Commerce from British com petition. It is a maxim in the natural world, to lop off useless branches, in order to save the trunks and roots,—it is the maxim of our Statesmen to de stroy the root, in order to save the branches. Now, I ask any man of common sense, how any but the present disastrous consequences can be expected from such unnatural and ill-concerted measures. Notwithstanding what is said to the contrary, I am ready to prove that, with the exception of the duty on foreign wool and rice, hardly a duty or tax has been laid since 1815 that has been founded on sound principles of political economy, and those two duties have not been carried far enough. Now, although it is so absolutely necessary, still, strange to tell, it appears that modern Statesmen never, in the arrangement of their measures, take into consideration the paymasters of our enormous national debt and expenditure, nor the case of our gallant defenders, the'profit able employment of our people, or how to pro , vide consumers for the return payments of our exports, while none of the above can b e dish pensed with. The Landed Interest, although consisting of only about one-third of our population, Par equal to about two-thirds of all our burthens ; divide these payments and protect our interest equally—our manufacturing and shipping interests afterwards would not stand foreign competition/ without being duly protected, a week----indeed the whole of our new commercial measures are the mere patch-work of, or props_ to, an unsound system, which in its working tends to destroy the profitable employment of our people, the wealth and power of our empire. Your very obedient Servant, JOSEPH PINSENT, A TRUE PITTITE• 22, Birchin-lane, May 24, 1822. N. B.—Every act tending to prevent our do ing our own work with our own people, like yours and Mr. ROBINSON'S Bills should be oppo' sed. To give our carrying-trade to foreigners/ is a new way of increasing our Shipping and Na vigation—such a one as our forefathers never thought of. Since writing the above, I am informed that the native vessels of foreign depots, or trans-ship ments, are to be put on a footing with British vessels : if so, my estimated loss to the British Empire may be trebled. What a pity our Pre' sident and Vice-President of the Board of Trade are not practical men ; and that they do not cal' culate on depending on our own in lieu of foreign exchequers and navies, that are always opposed to us. J. P. INHUMAN MURDERS.—Last night, the house of Patrick Linahan, near the Castle of Carrigalinea was broken into, and Eleanor Linahan, his wife, was barbarously murdered. The bed on which she lay, and every thing of value in the house , were taken away, including some money, one piece of linen, and one piece of frize. Patrick Linahan, the husband, a quarry-man, ha a , gone to work yesterday m orn i ng , an d hat , not returned home during the day. At an early hour this morning a servant boy who had been ic the house, and who had concealed himself during the horrid transaction, went to the house of Denig. Tuomy, which was the nearest to that in which he, lived, and gave the alarm, on which T uo my anr, several other persons armed thems e l ve s w ith such weapons as they could procure, and went to Li"' han's house, in expectation of finding the perpe trators of the deed, and found the unfortunate woman dead and weltering in her blood, he r , arms broken, her skull fractured, and severs wounds on different parts of her body. Lina' han's brother,who lived in the neighbourhood, 011 being informed of what had occurred, went t ° , Joshua Godfrey, a policeman, who proceede d to Coolmore, and apprised Wm. IL W. Newel" ham, Esq. of the murder. That Magistrate la' mediately repaired to the place, and havi n g received information which led him to suspe ct that a man named Michael Cahill was co ncern: ed in the murder, issued a warrant for his apprehension, with which warrant Godfrey came to Cork, and, assisted by Barrow, one of the City Sheriff's °Mal l : took him into custody in the house of hit brother, within a few yards of;the Conv` ( " t Depot, and on examining him found his sb`, T h bloody in several places, particularly on h ° ` sleeves. Cahil was then lodged in Bridewell f(). further examination.—At about 8 o'clock tr morning, search was made for Linahan , the husband, who had been missed since an earjly . hour yesterday. On examining the quarry which he usually worked, blood was di s c covered which was traced to another ea r % not far off, where his body was found, uode r rs heap of stones, dreadfully mangled. It aPPr i ., that a quarrel had taken place a few days he' ° : l , between Patrick Linahan and Michael Ca bl _ We understand that Cahill's father was tak7 into custody this morning, and brought to Cc ° more.—(Cork Paper, May 25.) • car MELANCHOLY ACCIDENT.-Thursday TAO rri gentleen, JOHN G ERARD, Esq. brother to Sir WILL GERARD, Barb of Garswood, Lancashire, the Rev. DI A ,N; CRATHORNE, Catholic Chaplain to Sir Wilma' ; an":. e at ADAmsox, of Ashton-in-the-Willows, and his eldest soli' "to out from Southport, in a pleasure-boat belonging .to 31r. t he HARD, with a fisherman named JOHN JACKSON, to enJoy jog diversion of fishing. About eight o'clock in the e ve oct the boat was seen a considerable distance out at sea, th e was shortly afterwards missed by the persons looking , fr°'" t er• shore ; but as no one saw it actually upset, a hope v , ' s •„'. o rtr• - tamed that the party had passed over to Lytham. _Nes-'i, - 3 0 , ing a messenger was sent to the latter place,. Who brollYu L 'dal intelligence that they had, not been there; but the ( 10 w `,. • tidings of their fate were announced in the coarse of tn e • by two of the lifeless bodies, those of Mr. ADA\iis,:lT i g .3 l3o l. the fisherman, being washed on shore. The other bod ie 'v , not been picked up when the last accounts left SouthP.°r —( Preston Ckroniele.) COURSE OF EXCHANGE, tlay2B. F, 14 9 C. A nisto clam , . Ditto, at Sight Rotterdam 12 10 Antwerp l2 4 , Haniburgh 3 . 7 ATton a Paris, 3 Day's sight 6 2 . a ri Ditto Ploiirdeatix, ditto . Frank fort on the Pal ti on • • 1554 Ex• f ` l tio Madrid .. ~ ec Cadiz. 36 bi e I , s lecti Bi'boa Barcelona 36 36 ~:eville Gibraltar • :•30 Leghorn Gtr orr .. 44 -Venice, Ital. Liv. 27 60 Malta 45.-Naples ,O • op Palermo Lisbon Oporto Rio Janeiro Dublin .... 91 Curl Vi pet Celli. BULLION. .L.O 0 n s 1 - ioi ••• 0 0 o o 0 ° o Portugal Gold, in Coin Foreign Gold, in Bars New Doubloons New Dollars Silver in Bars, Standard MARRIED. • a ft 1/ 5 ' On Monday, the 27th inst., at St—Andrew Undersi l 0 ' 3.1 0 denhall-street, Mr. Peter Blackburn, of the 3linories, Maria Adams, of Leadenhall-street.' Dna 1 40 0 , On Monday morning, in Portm i , Lady Anna i pr al Pelham Clinton, in the 14th year 3Ofsquareeldest datig'' the Duke and Duchess of Ne3Wcastl her age, e Gol d At Ham, on Monday last; Margaret, wife of tiener3l "" Forbes, aged 76. --------'''' - It , Printed and Published for the PROPRIETORS, xt thy Office, No. 112, Strand„ by J. B. CnasTAin9. s