The Sun. — London, England, 1801-12-10 00:00:00

F IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF PEERS, WEDNESDAY, DEC. 9. - ROUSE OF 'COMA/ION?. WEDINiESpAy, DEC 9. Tat-various Bills before the House were -for warded in. thei; rtspeaive'srages. The Milith; Regulation' Bill was read a 'third time ,and - passrd, and a Message ordered to the Commons to acquaint - tlem therewith. A. great 4leal of private and some routine business was disposed . The Committee of Privileges, relative to the Certificate olith6 Clerk_of the. Crown in Ireland,' •tvas' postponeit rill to.morrow. vt ,- Aftss waiting, some tune in expedation of some communications from the Commons, their Lordships adjogrned till to-morrow. _ . . , A - Message was deliy - ered•from the Lords, stating that. their ; Lordships had agreed. to. the I-lambursh Nav,al Store Bill, the Foreign Correspondence Bill, the Militia Bill, ;and some Frivate Mr.. MAY presented a Petition from the Town of Belfast, setting forth the-inconveniences'arisi4g fronttiie - cootinu,ince of a duty; which was termed in the Petition the . Six Per Cent. Retail Duty,. and praying . for the repeal of the same.—Ordered to lie on. the -Table; • • _ • Mr. CO I? RY moved, that there , be-laidliefore the Houie an 'Account of the AMount of the said Duty for Ole last"fine: years: Ordered. W. DUNDAS • bibught up a Bill fot the eree tionof a Bridecirell for the County of AlSrdetri ; it was read a first tine.' • Mr. MARTIN, brought op a Petition fiOrn the In. habitants of :Tewkesbury, - praying' the House to take 'somemeastzies - to prevent the Distillers from :using Grain in the,making if Spirits. Air,' or .k . T said, tip,: a.number . of these petitions 'had been p;:escrited,. and had been ordered to lie on "the able. The'opinions.contained in these petitions, .thit the eipening the Distilleries would increase the priCe of. Briad; now become general.; and it coaki no longer he called a popular prejudice, since the 'City of London had adopted .it. Ie wished to . know, whether the Right Hon. Genttemattmeant to 'inove. for the appointment .of an early day after the Rect - Ss tor taking it into'coniideration The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he 'believed the Honourable Gentleman 'himself had been.,the. first to call, this opinion a Prejudice ; but he Aid not. lise at .present to enter into a discussion of that subjed : he rose in consequence of the ques tion which har been proposed by the Hon.GentleMan ' w'h tpcili.e-last to the Hon. Gentleman - who brought up the Vetition: . Hecunceived it to be one of the most undoubted duties a a Member of -Parliament, to present Petitions to that House, provided they were couched in proper - and respeCtful . terms.; but when the Petition ,Was presented;. the Member had done his duty, and he was by.no means:committed to support any of the opinions. which - might be ad ' vaned ; in such Petition; which,. after "it had been. dpresented, became.,:as it were,' the property bf s the ouse, and any other Gentleman had as much right to make a motion upon — it, as the Gentleman by whom it was introduced.: The flonOUrable ,Mem ber, in point - of'qriEt forM; had no right; to call Upon the 3ollourable - Gentleman Who Presented. the P,eti., tionlo appoint day for taking it into consideration. It the Hon;Genclenin thoughtpat this was a subje& upon whidvinquiry was necessary, it.w.as.fully cord petent to that Gentleman to Make a motion on the sibject. • :. . , Mr. DENT said, he ,was aware of the Forms of the louse upon this subreer, but he hadbeen in ducedridask the question from a consideration, that if the House broke ,up % . vith•opt some,decision upon this subjea, the mischief would still gu on. , He wAs convinced, that if there. ',*as sufficient time, Petitions against Distilling from Grain, would come frorn_all quarters, _particularly_from the North. The.CEl 4N CeLt,ox.ofthe ExcHEOLT.itt ex t • nlained. • Sir ` ROBERT BUXI'OIV said," that when the . - Petition from the City . of London tp)on.thiS subjeet was presented,. sevral obSetVationS occurred to him, with which:he. - didnot. thinkit necessary to trouble the House at that time.. The produce -of the crop, of this yearlhad been abundant beyond ekample,. but . if wheat was reduced below acerulin priee, that is to say, mo . re' than' ihree7ponnds a load less, than the present price, the Fartnett could not live; they c'euld., not afford to grow Wheat. It "should be re_ collected, how much the expellees. of the ,Farmer were increased ; , how the Poor Rate ; wete aug mented how much 'higher the 'price aLatiour was; and When all these were taken into Consideration, the. House, he was sure, would agree with him in the opinion he had laid down . ., - It shOuld be recoh. •Ktedy, that they were not now t-Alking about Dis, tilling Itom Wheat, which .was prohibited, hilt ordy from Ba-riey, by permitting the pistilleries .t 6 go -on, as nine' food would be produced,- as if the .Barley was made into Bread. Mr. MARTIA 'said; it was not his intention to make ;my other Motion- respe4ing this Petition,. dm - that:it . should lie on the Sir -LP:: DOLBEN said, it was the enormous '.rice which Farmers put upon their Grain .that had augmented the Poor Rates so -Much. He knew rer fealy 'Well, that in his par - frof the•country , the Far epujky vcry. -afford' to sell their Corn Cheaper than they did. Mr. ALE:i7kODE brOught . up the Report of the Starch 116 i—which was agreed to, and the -Bill was ordered<to be ingtossed. Mr..W.DU .N DAS gave notice that he should, affe i r ; the Recess, .propose the application of. acer tiw. sum of riviney for repairing the, Roads and f3ridges in,the Four Northern Counties of Scotland, which were, he said, at present almost- inaccessible, Theßepor t of the Irish ,Whe - ot_ Distillery - Bilt was brotght-up. Mr. FA NUTT/Het proposed a CfailSe, iryg. the Bill to 1):•:.:•--repe*d• or altered during • the present - Session—wiach was agree I to. said, he would, - with the perrnitan of ihe House, take this..opportunity ofmaking a few more observa tions, which had occurred to turn upon this subjea. He had undertood that it was the intention of some Gentleinen-to make a pioppsition. before the Huse went into a Committee upon this Bill, to wood it to other.articles, because the complaint against thii - Bill was, not on account of any thing which it Contained; but for what it did not contain, or in other words, that it did nut go far enough. When this , subjea was first discussed,• the propriety of including another, species of - Grain in ;the, Prdhibi ti6n, came. froth a Certain quarter Which could not ' now be alluded to without regret; it was from a per son whom -they had lately the happiness and honour of seing among them, and whose loss they must all deplore—a-person whoseonemory must be respeaed arid honoured . by all those-who-considered a sound 'understanding, extensive knowledge,' the most honourable feelings, and . the most benevolent heart, as entitling a man to respea and honour, - He how ever„begged leave tci state hi,steasons'for'differing even from such an Authority., and for not applying the Prohibition to Oats, as had been recominended by that. Right Hon. person (the late Sir JoaN PARNELL). It was to be observed, that Oats were not used far the purpose ofdistillation in this Country, - and very little. in Scotland. l- Ireland the thief articleoffoodof the poor was Potatoes. - Considerable quantities of. Oats were exported from Ireland to Scotiand, where *they were the common food ; but he was happy to observe, that in Scotland the price of that article wasloW. It was generally said in Scotlaod,' that, a Labourer had no .reason to complain when by his day's work' he could_ procure a 'peck of Oatmeal: •Now . the :OrdinAty ' - pay of .Labourers in Scotland :was from SiXteen-pence to twenty-pence a day, and -,the Price of a . peck of Oatmeal was from twelve - pence to fifteen-pence. So that there appeared no good reascin:lwhy distilling, from Oats in . Irelaod should be prohibited. He . would ,- now say a few words upon the stibjeet of Revenue. —He - confessed he-"did- not lay any ,great stress upon the' increase of ,• Revenue, as an argument for opening the Distilleries, • because he had 'been. governed by other considera ,tions ; , but he. would. by no means admit, that.-it • . was not to be' coriskiered .at all, or that it , would -not aff'ec'ted - -by the decision upon this subjeti, though certainly not to :such -a degree as had been imagined he had stated this when the Bill respea ing the -Duty upon - Spirits distilled from Molasses was before the' House, and whicn. he'was, sorry it had-been . found necessary Ito postpone till after the ,Holidays. The difficulties which subsisted upon this subjea, arose from the price : of Grain in Ire land, as Barley -in that Ciiiintry, 'though cheaper than it was in England, yet was-above the export .Another difficulty -arose from.. a restraint _ which they were under in ccinseqtteiide of ihe Aft 'of- Union,: which prevented- them from making-any distinaion between Spirits diatilledfrom Malt, and ,Those distilled from Molasses and Sugar. 'The, si tuation then it; which they stood -, was , this, that if ' they were to prohibit the Distiller . ies in any'part ' the United Kingdom, the consequence Woad mediately be, that the Distilleries woUld'be'clan destinely carried on in Ireland to an enormous ex tent, to- the great diminution of the Revenue, to the _injury of the fair . Trader, as well as to the' Morals_ of the People nor was it altogether uncontieaed.. with the peace of that Country: in Scotland also there would be- Distilleries clandestinely' and il legally - carried on,' though not to such' an ex. tent as. in ,Ireland ; and, - in those -parts' Of the Country, where that was not the - case, they s'mtig gle in Spirits from the Continent. So -that the, first consequence of stopping the Distilleries, would be _to encourage, clandestine Distilleries in.lreland, and also to .encourage. the - smuggling iii of Spirits fecnit the Continent into Scotland. As to the ob. servation. that they • might distill 'from Molasses, that was urged upon a supposition, that a ldwer duty Might be imposed upon- the importation of Spirits distilled from. Molasses, than upon Spirits-distilled fmai Grain ; but he Inid before stated, that this was iintiraaicable inconsequence of the provisiOns of the At of Union. lie trusted that Many of the .difficulties, which now prevailed, would - be done away, by the adOption of a wise system of later_ course between .the -two Countries, by whiCh the price of Grain would be equal -in both. This could °ply be done by establishing a free intercourse be. tween them, hylorgetting, if he might use the ex_ p t resSion, that' we were divided from . that - Country by the sea, and by , rejecting those .opinions which, had been formed in a former state of -things. The 'adoption, of the -system to which;he alluded; he was convinced, would be produCtive, in Ireland; of die most beneficial effeas) it woula-encourage habits of • industry, it would promote Agriculture, "d the generill'diffusion of property : to England also con, siderable advantages would ensue, because we should no longer' have to seek our Grain from Foreign - &untries. This Was .the.ophtion he had formed Upon this question, to which he had given every de. gree of consideration in his power, and he thought it hardly necessary to add, that if any plan could be devised which would.have a tendency to -lower the . price of the necessaries of life,. withour.violating alt those principles • to :which we were bound to ad ' ,here, .he would devote his-best attention-to it. He would confess, that, at the same time, he saw othei obstacles, into-the discussion of which he would 'not now enter, because he had troubled - the House at some length upon: them, on former Occasions. With ' respea to the loss which the Revenue would sustain, if all Distilling, except from Molasses, was•pro hibited, had only to:observe, if the Duties upon . -Spirits so distilled, .fell:Short of , 7 or 800,0001. the loss to the Revenue would -be the difference between that : . sum and that - which- they - pro. duced. Upoo :the- whole, therefore,' thinking, after the fullest consideration, that the effect of prohibiting the DiStillerics would be only to encou rage the imporfatioo of Smuggled , Spirits into Scot land, which all the of our Cruizers would be unable to prevent ; to encourage illegal- Distilla tion in krelan4, by ' which means an eaual.quailtity of Grain- would be cOrisnmed,the'Revenue.defFatitt ed, and the f:lir Trader injurea ; thinking dint the open i ng of. t he:pi sr ilieries would have:, a very con. idetable .effea iii;reducing the price of Meat,-, the distress lirisiteg from which was only inferior to t-he distress - ariaio4. front-the clearilei Bread a I v could - Dittiileiles, and consequently snouid give his sup port £6 the present Bill. Mr. bENT said he hoped that after a fair trial,. ifJlte present plan was found to be ineffeatiall,. that Government would not hesitate to give it up - . With respea to the quantity of Barley consumed in the Distilleries, he had always been of opinion that the quantity of Barley used in the Distilleries was so small, that' he never could see the reason for stop_ ping them at all. Undoubtedly 300,000 quarters could not make a scarcity, but he had never said that.. the scarcity was real; on the contrary he had always been of opinion, that it was artificial, and produced by engrossing and other praftices of a similar na ture. With respea to the tendency of the opening of the Distilleries to reduce the price of Meat, he understood that a calculation had been made, by which it appeared that the, Distillers generally fed above 41,000 hogs ; that they bought them when they weighed about 12 stone, and fed them till they weighed about rB.—This was certainly deserving of'conSitiel-ation. It had been said, that it was not permitred to persons to distil Wheat, bUt •he was convinced ,that no regulation could prevent its being used for that purpose.; Indeed that appeared pretty evidently from a trial which took place some time ago, when a person was' conviaed for using Wheat for this purpose, and very cheerfully paid a fine of 5001. because he had made many Thousands by it.. _ _ _ .Mr. VANSITT ART remarked, that_ a consi derable part of the season for distilling had gone by, as it generally began about the- Autumnal Equinox, consequently the, quantity of Crain consumed could not he so great. The - CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER explained. Mr. W. DUND AS entered into some calcula tions in support of what had fallen . from- his Right Hon. Friend, particularly relative to the situation of Scotland in those respels, where, he observed, the price of Oatmeal could not be to low. Mr. COERY wished to. offer a few remarks re_ . lative to the situation of Ireland.ln that-Country the. regulations adverted tv by the Hon. G-eniliman' would be imptatticable in its present circumstances; in consequence of the late abundant _harvest,' which: induced a consumption of grain before .unkno'wn. 7 -- . On this ground principally it was that the Procli.: mation of the Lord Lieutenant and Council of Ire land ,praceeded, the ohje4l of which was to. open, the Distilleries in that. part of the United Kingdqui, on the first of January, in concurrence the period fixed for 'that measure in Great Britain.' Ti was found impossible to restrain the extensive COTI:.. sumption of grain, they were forced to the alter native, whether the usual. and licenced, Distilleiies Should be permitted to work, or suffer the inhabitants to be supplied with the produce,of illicit Distilla tions, in' a way equally destruffive to the health and morals of the consumers, as injurious -on the ; score of Revenue, in which the-defalcations caused hy . the stoppage, must be supplied,' 'perhaps by' -grievous and :buithensothe irriposts -hOWever; he : ,was of opinion that the abundant hatv'eStin :and o the great crop of Potatoes, and the plenty of Grain in the Country, were consideration's which would decidedly obviate every oblation, as . fat as they .respated Ireland, „which had been made The measure before 'the -House:. 1 -. • , Mr. DENT spoke .very: Shortly in explanatioh, which again called up . Mr. CORRY, who observed it was. impossito to separate 'the countries with 'respea to what the Ho.: nourable Gentleman had adverted to,' as one of'the. provisions in the' Ad of Union obliged this Country. to take in Spirits from Ireland, under a certain duty ; the idea I,v-as impratliaable, unleSS' it was Meant to .lay doWn.a differept•system - ..cif policy for - the respee.-' tive countries. , He again adverted to the injurious consequences which must. ensue in Ireland: were the Distilleries .Stopt there. . Vnder- the present circum stances, it was iinpossible. to. adopt a different policy for both Countries, and hoped such an idea was. hot even in contemplation. Mr. DENT and the CHANCELLOR of the Ex- CHE-QtrER explained. Mr. ROBs'S'ON, after slightly adverting to the consequences. of such a measure with respea to Scotland, observed, that with regard 'to Ireland tte.„ was more than ever confirmed in the opinions 11010.. liven on a former. night. He ieitned - decidetifi?' adverse to the measure, and proceeded to . obs - 6rve, , ,that it was extraordinary such a line of condul : . should be , thought of at a time When a R6port of a Committee of the House 'of Cortuitons, strongly re. commending the stoppage of the DiStilleries as, one of the most efficient means of lowering the Price of Provisions :—this was also the opinion of the Othq , House of Parliament, . In addition' to this, 'it 4-a0 in the Reports, that Barley was the' chief food 'of the inttatAt. w Ati of many Counties . ; in some, almost entirely : the question . then'-Of opening 'the Distilleries 'was a great and important considera. don. In his opinions on this subjeft he was sup: ported by the City of London ' , as well as of several other Cities, and .a great part of the inhabitants of the Country,' - as•the numerous Feritions upon ihe Table evinced. On these grounds 'he would, intreat the House to , pause before - 'it shoirld, determine. The proposed line •of eondud' was also still more objedionable, when' it • was - eon.' sidered, how little . time had. elapsed, since the, House voted z4,,0001.- for•the support of the Poor in some of the Eastern, Parishes, If Bread was to continue ,the principal food of the Country,, he would ask . ' the. House, how fir the State of • the, Country Ahwl changed since that time, which trey warrant the proposed line of conduct ? What was the „difference in the Price -of' Provisions, which would .warrant them in suffering the Prohibitory Laws to expire, and at a time when every Article of Provision was at the height it then -was ? For hii part, he .w'oul'd persist, and in every Stage give his 'Strenuous _opposition to such ,a line of policy.. He was confident,. that did the House remain sit ting-, the number of,Petitions upon the Table would be, •at feast; doubled. He, thought Parliament, -in such circumstances, should continue sitting ; and he could prove, that the Revenue would not. even tuallY surer by continuing the Prohibition, as by. Jet - 6;g 'the Distilleriei loose, the Revenue may 'increase in that partictilarbead, but 1ic.w.2.4 certairv, it would lose more itl4t)thet ways.- words, inconsequence of a p o i nt or two which had fallen from' the Hon. Gentleman, with respel to the Sum which the House had voted for the Relief of the Poor of certain Distrias, it was 30,0001. that had been voted, of which it was found.nccessary to expend only 24,000r.—8it he would beg the House and the Hon. Gentleman-to recolleft, that it was at t .period when the distress of the Country, with ro speel to Provisions, was-at its greatest height; - and in partiCular, - the price of' Grain was at that period fully double what it was at present. • This, he thought, was a sufficient answer to the Hon. en. tleman's question. Did the difference in the prieeg 'of Provisions - warrant the HoUse in, , permitting the Distilleries to work ? In midi ticin- great a nd .obvious difference-in the prices of Grain, -was to be added the very fair prosped. therhad respett to -the future sipply_from the late abundant harvest. • Mr. ROBSOH,* in explanation, entertdinto some short calculations respelling the mode and times of payment of the- sum of: 24.,0001. for the relied - , of the Poor ; a part of_ which,. we understood him to say, was not more than a month 'previous - to the agitation of the business in question. • Mr.. V ANSITTART said a few words i n order to re lify some errors in the statements of the Hon. Gentleman, respelling the payments of the 'money in question which called up Mr. ROBSON in explanation ; who was again answered by Mr. VANS /TTAR T, who offered some explanatory remarks. -• The SPEAKER felt hiniself Galled upon to notice the irregularity of a conversation, the iti4jea of which was irrelevant to the question. before the 'Rouse, which he formally announced to.be,—" That this Clause do stand part 'of the Bill." ' - On the question being regularly put, it was care tied ;. as were the other parts of the report. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he had to apologize to the HouSe for again offer ing himself, after having so•recently trespassed upon them rather in detail ; but it was a respell ,which he felt 'due to the Petitioners; many of whom were of the most respe6able classes; to acknowledge that the Table of; that House did. not 'contain all the Pe titions which had been offered, on the occasion. Se• veral had been received, particularly lrom Scotl sod, expressive -Of 'the •greatest uneasiness and anxiety upon vtl3e subjea, addressed' to the Lords 'Commil. sionets. Af" tbe.Treasury, who, it was unnecessary to sag, had paid every possible attention to thenL '=thought it right to make this ackno'V;Aedgeniert, thai .:thetemere many- other PetitiOifs.,' from Scotland, of the same -sort..-as t . thosa-nosv- van the Table. The Bin was then ordered to - be ;forthwith its grossed, and read a third time thit evening, i 5 ready. , \ • The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHECUEg moved, " That the Ame4nents made by t he Lorc4" - to - fire - Foteigweorresponderice . Bin, be not/ taken into consideration." ,The same were accordingly taken-into consider ation by the House, and _severally agreed ta; an,/ a Message ordered to' the Lords to acquaint theta ther6virb. - " • ZV/r. A.L,4XANDER presented the Report of the Committee upon the East India judicature RegO , hitions, appointed to examine the Lists of the Memtiers eleaeti by ballot to constituie the said Judicature, Which, atter stating, that - the naracs of all . persons holding any Ciril Ofii,c.e under the Crown, "or The . Office of a Commissioner for the .Afrairs. of India, or holding any Appointment ia the Service of the East India Company,' had 1.461 0 struck out pursuant, to the orders of Parliamenti the following names were then read, of the D 440 1410 eletled ;- Lord Vis. Cistlereagh Sir E. C. Hartonp, BIM 4finesicy, 'Esq. Sir Est: Knatchbull, sot. pidter; Esq. . • 'Hon R. .Las4.-ell its Lord Vis. Clierden ; Lord Vis. Marsinn” Hon. W. H. Bouverk • • - Wm. Mitiord, stl- • T. B. Bramstort, Esq. -W. Morton Fitt, zsig, jOhn . Calcraft, Esq. Sir W. Pulteney, Bart W. R. Cartwright, Esq; Hon. Richard Ryder William Currie, E'sq. H. Strut,, Esq. Lord Vis. Suclity . 1. C.hades .A„darns, Esq. a • sit W Elford, Eart. Hon_. W. A. Towristioa 4 _ . Si, 1.. Frederick:, ,part.. . * .tord Vis. Cole Sir Law. 'Parsons, Bart. Ron. J. S. Wortley Tnarnas Stanley, _ Esq,. Edward Lee, Esq. Sir W. Geary, art. ' • Sir - f. StLwr, Sag. William Pjurner, EsT. The - Committees of Supply and Ways and ;deans , Nvere, on the motion of the 'CIiAIICELLOR of th' ExcHoyEa, deferred •till Fridat. • - The Bill for permitting until the first of P i t 18oz, the making ..of Starch from Rice, Potarl .84c. was ready thathte`and . paSsed, and ordered to the Lords for their concurrence. The Itish Distilleries' Bill was then read a thI S4 time and passed, The remaining Orders of the Day were the disposed of, and the House at six o'clock, adjeol fv ed till Friday next. eßefore the Members separated, the Srvil stated that the nature of the business on Frio 4 would render a rather earlier hour - of Meeting.l t cessary, and said he should attend at A wres o' that day. • • THE SUN. COLIEM QUI3 DICIRI ALSUM AUDIAT ? LONDON, DECEMBER to, ISOj~ WE this morning received Patis journah of tilt' sth inst. 'one day lacer than those which came t ° hand yesterday.. • These Papers contain nothing respeeting Mattlei: Colt4wAws. He arrived at 47ziens on the I s inst: • N. . e f, The Tribunate were occupied on the sth 1° with the discussion on the Report respeaingi Treaty concluded with the KING of iIAPtItS. I°7 Committee on the subjeft, recommend the ratifier tion of it, with some observations. These chi ;relate to the phraseology Qf the Treaty, WW the Reporter pat " The King of liberty all perm. respefting the li The expressic deemed too veal forma/ p romise; tonal lova= merit. • In the . Trilitn the American that and; the Ba, Tile celebrate gezously ill at C 4 44:774. and Loire after a jourftey- They write I Illat City, and ttilable; that of try amounts to The General 41 andatit of Art i\lovernber. French Fund: 3f. oc. The French from G Acacia -tatizanands there lowing Letter I CITIZE " I this mel that in the Er teport is sprea bf Colour and public safety ) of disorder an always draw these reports ; and trowhig prosp( ttpose, fearing tnent, than the teaulatioo, dee; ;'stern of our Arta. " The folio gave rise to d taglish.—The 41 Ppeared to soz I , er period of al 4 . 1 00 ofizaking '' 4 ripts of Ilai, Cited 40-thoid s. Pe4,„ ieached broke the 'blur! 'jeke, and km .dividuals svp , t ) :lfiefuned, oni `Yt;ais, and a tli belonged ihtlireali inipi i ncorporateti it 14 1? on s r will be They.wes Pitated ;in Olt existence forerunner,. Orested thel . 11 Council of Public opinion kesendy give .I)roceedings. " Annexei Vonscripts. l tid. this exam Order to prevel moors circulate I can wa th a t .the there.—Hei,ltE ,„ , , N t itrs have clailj ich occasio2 7 ,. inisters of- tt " 4 $ PRUSS/AN 1 2. t Ambassado !nes assisted. t . IVlinist bien Ouzri ' 4 ecliat e ly set • - .rzetb. • .1 IkATlslsol;';' the comnu hepro l ee b , f re by Ex6:1 . 01 tonduft acc . c em irs given; nd to` 7*h-when "tided.