The Sun. — London, England, 1804-01-27 00:00:00

Mr. ABBOT moved for a rule to chew cause why the itiqpisition taken in this case should not be set aside, and another Writ of Inquiry be executed, on the ground of excessive damages. The Plain. tiff and Defendant were next-door neighbours; the one of them claimed a right to take in his coals through a hole which was under the gateway of the other, who shut_ his. gate. They met, quar relled, and jostled each other; after:which the De_ fendant sent for a Constable, charged the Plaintiff, and ordered the Constable to take him into custody, which he did ; this was about seven in the morn ing. Before they arrived at Giltspur-street, Comp_ ter, th Defendant requested the Constable to let the PiaintifF go, but he insisted on being taken to the Compter himself, which he was accordingly, and talked of bringing his alion against this De fendant, and conversed with. the Turnkey upon that subjcCt, who said to him, " Sir, if you want to ',rico. an anion for false imprisonment, you had better be locked up ;" which he was accordingly. Mr. ERMINE liv , ved for a Rule to shew Cause why a new fri 41 s! - ;:,uld not be had in this Case. It was an adion by Mr. Dewey, who was a creditor of Lord Arundel, against Sir Andrew Baynton, Bart. Sheriff of the County of 'Wilts, for a false Return of a \Vrit of Execution issued at the suit of this Plaintiff against the goods and chattels of Lord • Arundel, in Wardour Castle. The Sheriff had entered and levied upon the goods to the amount of about zoo'. but being afterwards assured that the remainder he had taken possession of were not the goods of Lord Arundel but of Lady Arundel, under a legal Deed by which they bad been conveyed to her Ladyship's use, therefore the Sheriff had returned nulla bona as to the rest of the debt upon which an aCtion was brought against the I Sheriff for a false Return, and a verdil was found for the Plaintiff. The present Motion was ifii i de upon the ground, that these goods were origitialli---the property of Lord .Arundel, who after his marriage had become embarrassed with debts, and who was importuned by creditors. Lady Arundel was possessed, under her marriage settlement, of an estate of 40001. a year, with remainder to her issue male, remainder to herself in fee ; she was now above the age of 60, had two daughters, but no male issue, and therefore 'the estate was wholly in herself. In order to relieve his Lordship from his embarrassments, she consented to raise 12,0001. upon her own estate ; this is ex. elusively her cwn, upon condition that furniture and various effefts should he conveyed to Trustees for her use. This was accordingly done by Deed. Lord and Lady Arundel lived together without any idea of separation. It appeared in evidence at the Trial that five different Executions had issued against the goods of Lord Arundel, and he had paid them all to redeem the goods in question.. Lord ELLaNaotiouott held, that while the husband and wife lived together, the. possession of the wife was the possession of the husband ; that in this Ca s e i t was fair to infer, that as the Noble Lord had bought these goods so often of the Sheriff, they might be called the goods of his Lordship, if so, the Sheriff in returning " there were no more goods," had made a false Return, and therefore the Plaintiff .was en titled to a verdki.—The Jury found a verdia for the Plaintiff far the remainder of his debt. It was contended, that as this was a real and bona fide Contraft, that Lady Arundel became the owner and possessor of these goods for a valuable conside, ration, namely, 72,0001. out of her own absolute estate, they could not, under any circumstances whatever, without her consent, or. the consent of her Trustees ) become the property of her husband. That if she had had them by virtue of a Settlement before Marriage, no doubt could be entertained upon the subject but they must be her's, and no en gagement of her Lord could affed them. Here she had them in virtue of a post Nuptial Contra, which made no difference, provided it was for a valuable consideration, and the possession accorded with the title, that no engagements of her husband could 1 after Wards affed such property, which was abso. LONDON: Printed by BUCIIANAN WMILLAN, (of Bow-Street, Covent-Garden); aso enti,hcd by e NW:RR SCRIP... (et South lbluitoil,blort kiltw,ecor-squarejj; A t the SuN.OFF lc , No. 2 Strand ; where Advertiormotto, Order, fot. the Paper, Letter, for the Editor, &c. (port t e a ) , must be aodrewd. Tim is a case which has been before the Public for some time, and has been more than once detail ed. It is an anion by the Plaintiff, as Proprietor of a Song, written by Mr. Dibdin, and called Abraham Newland, and set to music, against the Defendant for pirating this Song, set to music by the Defendant, tried before Lord ELLEITBOROUGH and a Special Jury, in Guildhall, London, when his I,•rd,hip nonsuited the Plaintiff, on the, ground that this publication, did not come under the provi. sion of the Statute of Ann, which was passed for the protedion. of - Literary Property, because this pub. lication, bring upon a single sheet, could not be r aft er } a B ',lc; the Statute being for the ?romaion of Property in Books, &c. Mr. HaslstwE hal moved on the 'first Day of the Term for a Rule to show Cause why this . Nonsuit should not be set aside, and a new trial had, and the Court desired that Mi. ERslcrNe should take time to look into the Authoritie s upon this subjea, which he did, and to.day he rene-wrd his Ivlotinn, in support of which he irst stated the immense importance of the clues. tion, at.tl Op! vast quantity of property which de pended upon it,' requiring that the Law should be LA down in a solemn manner by the Court ; for thett if this INTnnsuit was right, then all Composers of Musical Pieces, the number and value of which were not conceivd by any but a few who were ac. (painted with that Science, would be utterly un. ti,,ne, who had published their works, as they had been in the con , tant habit of doing, in single sheets He then proceed to argue from Authorities that this should not he taken to be the Law. He cited the case of Miller and Taylor, in which he said all the learning -4 all the mast learned men of their pro. fession, in their day, was colleaed together—the opinion of all the Judges having been taken upon it by the House of Lords, who decided the case. He maintained that all, the reasoning of that case was it, favour of the doctrine for which he contended now. He quoted also the case of Bcck and Long, in Cowper, 6z3, in which a Musical Composition, called a Sonata, had been held to be under the pro.' teaion of this Statute, and he maintained that this doCtrine. had been constantly held - in the Court ot Chancery. In one case that came before the Court of Chancey question was sent td a Court of Law to certify its opinion ; and the question wa s this, Whether a musical CompoSithat is within the Statute of the Bth of Ann, entitled an At for the Encouragement of Learning; and the Court certified to the Chancellor in the affirmative. He observed that these musical compositions w almost always in single sheets. He quoted also the case of Storace against Longman, which was tried before-Lord KENYoN and a Special Jury, in Guildhall, London, at the Sittings after MiChaelinas Term, 1788, which was for pirating a musical com position. The declaration in this case stared that the Plaintiff was the composer and proprietor of a certain musical air, tone, and writing, Sec. this was only a single sheet, which contained a musical corn. position tot Madame Storace to sing at the Opera, upon which the PLintiff recovered, and it never oc. curred to any body to move in arrest of Judgment, He quoted several other cases to the same effrtt, an" argued that as it had been decided by the to elite Judges, that by the c-mmon law an Author was -prii•ftird_ in literary pr. petty only while it remain ed u MS. and that printing and publishing it took away that proteai , ,n, for it then became the proper ty of the Pubiic, and as the Ad of Ann was an Set made for the encouragement nf learning, it ought to bP c mtrued in favour, nor of ho , ks or publications according to the quantity or bulk of a work, but the protection should be extended to every in teli-!1”,n labour or mental exertion, for otherwise the enc• uragement of the Aft would extend only to 'titz)rble binding, so that some of the best literary vZo'rks, which by the w..y were none the worse for being 'hurt, would lose the proteaion of the Statute alt , gether,because they might be published in sheets, which wa , the case of the Speaator and many other exc enet t Works : lastly, he gave a definition of the wood B. ok from Johnson's DiEUonary, shewing that the word Book comes from the Saxon word bock, which means beech, on the rhind of which our an. cestors used to v.fi:e their thoughts which were eaikd Book. That which was afterwards bound up and covered with vellum or leather, which we now call a: bock, was not necessarily implied in the primitive sense of the word Book. So it might be sa id also of. the first book in which children are taught, the hornbook, which was certainly a ba4•k made of a single sheet ; he concluded by observing upon the importance of the case, and Saying that if the Court held themselves absolutely bound to con. fine the word Book to the present popular sense of that word, he could not support his case ; but he thought it would not, and he submitted the whole matter to the Court. Rule to shew cause granted. GRIT V. COOT ER. Mr. Serjeant BA/LEY moved for leave to file a criminal information against William Thompson, for sending, and ,Percival Barker,-,tor carrying a" challenge to a Gentleman of the, name of Sutton. Mr. Thompson was lately a partner in the house of Atkinson and Co. ; upon the death of Mr. Atkin son, application was made to the Court of Chan eery to remove Mr. Thompson from any share in the conduEt of the business, and that a Receiver should be appointed to take cart• of the profits of the tracke, &c. and that Mr. Thompson should be discharged from attending, otherwise than as such Receiver should dire d, to explain the accounts, &c. Sutton was appointed/such Receiver, and Mr. Thompson received from Messrs- Farrer and Lacey; eninent Solicit Ors in the City, an intimation that he.was requested to appear before the Receiver at a given time; on which Mr. Thompson %rote a challenge to Mr. Sutton, which was carried by Mr. Barker, and afterwards fully explained to be a challenge to fight a duel. Rule to shew cause granted. Articles of the Peace were offered on behalf of Mr. Sutton, updo the very same faas. The CH t EF JU,T I C c said, that the parties wonld do well to consider whether they would persist in this mode. If the Ankles were exhibited, the Court would order the Defendant to give surety for the preservation of the Peace, bur that would he a good reason against making the Rule for a Criminal Information abiolute. The Articles were . then: withdrawn, and the Rule for the Criminal Ipforma tion taken. .. LAZY REPORT. COURT OF KiNG's i3ENCII, TAR. z 6. HIND '‘V. DALE. At t z o'clock the parties went before the slttlng Alderman, when the c. mplaint was discharg ed. Upon this the aOion w as brought for false imprison - . ment, and the Jury had given 1501. damages. - - Mr. Assoc submitted to the Court; that as in this case the bird had insisted upon flying into the cage, this was rather too much reward for it.—Rule to shew cause granted. CRIMINAL iNFORMATIOif. HUDDAAT eV; CRINIsHAw AND OTHERS. Mr. GIBBS moved tor a Rule to shew Cause why the Verdict in this Case should not be set aside, and a new Trial had. The Plaintiff, late Captain of aihip in the East India Company's service, but 'AO' now carries sn an extensive Rope_manufadory at Blackwall, is a Patentee for making Cables and Ropes, &c. brought this Aftion against the Defendants, who ate manu. tafturers of. Cables and Ropes at Sunderland, for in fringing upon his Patent. The Cl:lse was tried before Lord El. INI3 O. ROUGH and Special Jury in Guildhall, London, when the Plaintiff obtained a verdiA. The present motion for a -‘evt , Trial was made upon the ground, that a part of the machine which is matthial to its use, as stated in the Plaintiff's Specification, was n o t new, but had been made use of by Mr. Balfour in his Patent. Rule to shew Cause gaged. DEutY e. BATNTON, BART. Mr. Serjeant COCKELL sheaved came againt. a Rule Obtained - by Mr. Serjeant BAILEY, for setting aside an execution, and fot delivering up a PromiS sory Note for the principaLdebt and expences grant ed by the Defdratinr.itind his Attorney to the Plain.- `tiff, in considlram-ion a the Plaintiff's then aban doning the execution. . . Mr.SerjeantSo EPHERD and Mr. Serjeant BAILEY, in moving for the Rule, and in 'reply, - stated that in this case a judgment had been obtained against the Plaintiff in default. A writ of . fieri facia: hat' accordingly. been taken out, and transmitted to Chester, to be executed against the Defendant, who resided at Lancaster. Without proceeding, how ever, in the regular course, and 'knowing that the Defendant was in the course of serving a writ of error on the Plaintiff, his Attorney at Chester, ap plied for - and obtained from the Clerk to the Under Sheriff of the County, a warrant against the De. fendant, not in the regular course of bu,iness, but late on the evening of a Sunday. This warrant was immediately sent off express to.Lanc3ster, and was executed against the Defendant on the Monday morn ing early, before the arrival of the post, which con. veyed the notice of the writ' of error. In order to avoid the execution of the writ of . fieri facias, and to prevent the goods of the Defendant from being sold, the Defendant and his Attorney granted the Promissory Note in question. The writ ought to be set aside, and the Note delivered up, the Learned Counsel contended, cn three different grounds : Ist, The writ of error in this case was taken out on the r 2th, and the writ of feri farias was not executed t.ll the morning of the r4oh, notwithstanding all the precipitancy which had been used. Now, it was a point well established, that though a writ of error was not sufficient to throw the party into contempt till after b)tice, yetit operated as a thpersedeas from the moment it was allowed. 2d, Pie warrant in this case...had,heen precipitately granted, having been Obtained on, a Sunday eveoiug, without the know_ ledge. of the SUb-sheriff, who did not know that such warrant had been issued, and had not seen the writ of fer/ facia: till the writ of error was intimar_ ed to hint. .3d, Although it was necessary that a mandate from the Chancellor of the Datchy of Lan caster should have preceded the execution of such writ, that !mandate was not obtained till alter its .execution. Mr. Serjeant CoCXELL and Mr. Serjeant BEST contended, that the Rule applied for ought . to be dis charged. ,The Defendant had suffered judgment to gu against him by default. He had afterwards con. fessed the debt, by entering into a Promissory Note with his Attorney for the amount, at the time when his goods were in execution for the debt ; and it ap peared from the affidavits for the Plaintiff, that the Defendant had then positively departed from any advantage arising from a writ of error. They main tained, however, that the writ of error was not founded on any substantial ground, hut was merely calculated for delay. The warrant had been regu larly granted by the Clerk who had been in the pradice of issuing them. The Plaintiff, at the time o f executing the warrant, had no idea of any writ of, error having been applied for; and it appeared from the ffidavits produced, th a t the mandate of the Chancellor of the Dutchy might be obtained either before or after the granting of the warrant. The Court were of opinion that writs of error were not to be encouraged ; arid that, where no ob vious irregularity could.be shewn,' full weight ought to be given to the proceedings.: The mandate of the Chancello r o f the Dutch y a ppeared necessary wily for preserving his authority, not as essentially requisite for the execution of the writ of a Superior Curt. matter of praftice however, they wished :' rn ls 6' l 4?' l 'e l i e plicit evidence titan the affidavits before the Court afforded. enlarged, and addi tio ' n f a h l e Rule affidavits the Plaintiff teeing at liberty, in the mean time, to 17aslioawcecd accordingly in i g ielfid by both parties; , le proceed to recover under the Promissory Note, at his own risk. FORTY THOUSAND POITI4))S.—There being two Prizes of 20;oceal. and only iGur days more to draw, the first.drawn 'Picket to-morrow morning at nine o'clock, may be intitled to .1.0,0001. ; (zo,ocol. it is certain of.) An event somewhat similar to this ii3p_ pened some years back, on, the last morning of drawing :—The last-drawn Wicket was intitled to 1.0001. and there was one Prize beshles of 1,0301. in the Wheel, which fell to the last-drawn Ticket, and as such was intitled to 2,0001. The fort unate proprietor was a farmer at Islington.—This is an undoubted fat. Twenty Thousand Pounds will be a pretty break. fast for uhoever gets the first-drawn Ticket to. morrow ; but should the bolder of a Ticket miss the breakfast, he may get Twenty Thousand Pounds for dinner; for there -are two Twenty Thousand Pound Prizes : one that must be drawn the first Ticket to-morrow, and the other, in all probability, soon after. In fad, they may both be drawn in the same Ticket ; for the first drawn Ticket, whe. cher Bla n k or Prize, is entitled w 20,0001. The FirstArawo Ticket to-mnrrow morning is sure to be:wortii Twenty Thousand Point& at.least, even if a - Blank ; but it is possible to be worth 25,0001. or even 40,9001. fur the Wheel is im. menscly rich, and the Boating zo,oool. Prize 14 as likely to be the First.driiwn Ticket as any uther.— Tickets or Shares to obtain thi3 desirable obj:_•tt, are selling at AISH's Offices, 4, Cornhill, and 9, Charing-Cross, -where Capitai Prise' this Lottery have already been sold ; shared, registered, and paid on demand. . . .. lately vetted .. in lief: and 'ittiol in the haute 0 TrusteeS for her use. In support of this doftrine he q uoted a variety of cases, both in Courts Of Law .. a . f .A.Equity. Rule to stew Cause graTte& .---, ,• . -.. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, T&N. COOPF.R 'J. OW PN• • Vlf IP. Nr',llS; GRAVESEND, lAN. !q. Pafll by--the General Dick, Dunn, froth Guernsey; Cat- I )rtiry, from Malta; itece Horse, Largely, from "Trieste; lohnson, from St.l.lbes ; ,chit and 'George, Pat- Victorious, Sedni.,n, from Seville ; Carolina Bona, Loft, A msjerdarn ; Northerey, Clime, iron' . Rotterdam ; Caton,-Prince, and Isabella, Green, from Clinics- ; nvn ; Custayes, Renderon from Dieppe ; Young Genn,ett, • ----, and the Louisa Queetfof'llaples, Barry, from Stettin; • 'rince of Austrias, --, from Gibraltar ; George, Carman, end Ceres, Millington, from Oporto. BIRTH. On Wednesday last, at Sir Itornc Popham's, York-place, Portunn,s9uare, Lady Popham, °fa daugynter. MARRIED. Yesterd,y, at Laytonstone, Mr. Charles Cordon, Distiller, v oc in Goswen.street, to Miss Elizabeth Ncw,on, of Laytort• ,?' D IED. On Sunday the zzd inst. at her house at East Shen, Sur+. rey, Mrs. M:luvillain, aged - 91. On Tue'sday the: 17th inst.: John Haines, Esq. of Croy. ton. On the ist inst. Mrs. Margaret Hawksmore AdaMs, wife 1 , f George Herbert Adams, Esq. and widow of the late i'tntr tQrie john Caton, Esq. Vest.ruay sennight, at Nottingham, Mts. Broo'l:hea?, - wile of Captain James Broonihead, .vhodi,td the pr2„cedin4 . (14--they were hoh interred in one pave. Friday last, at Sunderland, aged'S3, Adam Scott, M. 'l). - . • senior physician to the Disp:lsary of that place. At her house, in St. AndNw's- sq , tiire, Edinburg' on t!t'z ' 22'! inst. Mrs..RObtrt6ol:l, rchtt ot ,tii , :: deceased Lieutz:iant- Gen . eral lames Robertson, of Newbiggin. At Barnagad, At - yleshire, on the 1 4 th instant, Coin Mao!: lachlan, 17 sq. et Crait;enterve. ' ' • - F STOCKS, ERDAY India Stec 173 i 2 ludia Bonds °Trillium 24 3 2h 2 Impel . . 3 er Cent. ss-} Ditto 9 9-16 Bank for Account Deterred 3 per Cent. Cons. t Fcb . 551, 5:1 6L 1f PRICE YEST Bllk Stock 155 Na', , , 5, et ent. 89?1 5 per Cent. 0 9 7, 5 41 3i 4 Irish 5 per Cent. 4 per Cent. Con 73i 2g « r R. 561.1,4 3 Cr C Con 55 t 1 6 ';4 13. L. Ann. ;6;., 9.16 13. S. Ann. A COUNTRY HOUSE WANTED To Rent, t G ~;(1 Mo..!erate Sizekl FAMILY 'HOUSE, r - •tua'.:e in t park or Padlock, iiidep:2l,,k-or of, and an easy distance Born a Ti.),.\-:1 or V i wage,' with a-ioitt thirty or fitty Acres of Meadow Pasture Lan twenty-five to fifty 'riles eiCter North, Sa...ith, o: West 17; London, in a ple..;:int naaithy wrier,: toe Roads a!' . good, and the liotr4 of Spurting :ingot be obtained. Apply to -M . Stephens, Upn, ider, Lower Brouk-screen Grosvenoi-square,London. • GOVERNMENT SECURITY AGAINST COUN' TERFEITS. " Samt. Sotomo''' withont having None are Cer.tlrte, Liver pOoi," enAraved hi the Stamp : and Ten P ow ids Re ward, for every Bottle sol'l without a Stamp, t o ho paid 'on conviction, under A a Ci l'o;rll:nnent, the 42d Geo. 10 4 Ch. t 6, before any lustiec of the Pt:::::. AN TI-IMPETIGINES; 'THOSE Persons w hi; have unfortunately T" , n l _la use of that dangerous mineral Mercury, would do welt to weigh the consequences befare it is too late, and resort to those Medicines of established celebrity and character for 3 permanent and radical Cure, an d t h ere by estabiish their • ,health, the most valuable of ail jewels, upon the most firs, and lasting foundation. The Anti-I mpetigmes being foorr ed on a cayancal and philosophical basis,' proves of or' highest utility in all cases of " depraved habit with al' feetions of the skin," hence its etßeaey in cases 0 41 scurvy. scrofula or leprosy, as well as in the loss; and hence, by its sanative power, it expels l aj a virus out of the sy-ii.tem, and. restores it to convalescc'7?i In • scorbutic complaints, Ines, &ea • Mercury, Ancol' a a t and AciatatOrtis have been reqommended and linen,, a . 4 they have reduced the Patients who have made ire of them to the most deplorable state, and have lett 4 ,0 . 1.4 , plaints which the skill and abilities of the first Physic:W ild have been unable to cope These disorders fly before efleets of the Anti-I mpetigines prepared by Dr. Solomon , Liverpool, which. restores Nature to her prtatine state ID ! I A most gentle manner, even when saliva/ion has failed, leaVes the whole frame firm and irealthinl. The Invii - ar c '•,' and respeaable signatures which have appeared in our P4 l . will speak more than any encomiums we can bestow un0 31 .:, • This Medicine is'only Half-a-Guinea a BOttle, and the 11,-. milt' Bottles with the quantity of iosr, Thirty-three 5 1 '.71; Bugs only, by which there is a staving of Nine ShillinO, copious folio bills of directions, and with the security`,;, having the Proprietor's name in the stamp, " Samuel S"', e , Liverpool," which secures to the eurchaser the 1, nuine Medicine. Likewise for pimples, blotches, frec'tleS, black-worms, carbuncles, &c. Sac. the greatest clearer a l ' beautifier of the face, is undoubtedly • SOLOMON's ABSTERG ENT LOTION, if Which removes all disorders of the skin,' pints 4s, 6d. o ' ? ' pints 2s. yd. It is the most elegant, fragrant, mild, s"' - , t rind valuable liqtrid or wash, for scorbutic and alliFt — zo' l '; tions on the face and skin. It gently restores the skin t ( ? ) , degree of fairness and purity, beyond the powers'nf.dear'j, tion. Ladies may rely that it tenders the skin fair, de;i s "l and removes every Itiaid of stain, tan, suntririi, and all freckles, which long illness, and fatigue, generally pr , d' c '", a 4 , in short, it is theonly cosmetic a Lady can use at he,. toilet` ; with ease, comfort, awl safety, or a Gentleman Lave r i t course to when shaving is become a dreadful operation b)' ernptive disease on the face. eb N. B. The Postage of all Letters must be paid, and 3 . enclosed for advice. The Cordial Balm of Gilead, Anti- I mpetigines, and 21/)1 stergent Lotion, and " Guide to Health,' arc e cti Sold by Remnant, Hainburgh ; It. Bach, Peter. -sty ; 4 New-York ; 'Mathews, No. 18, Straw!, London ; 13ath, by. Hazard ; Bristol, Bulgin ; Brighton, Gregory ; mingliam, Knott and Lloyd ; Bedford, Smith ; Bian chi Simmons ; Bury St. Edmund's, Dingle ; Cheltenham , 5 . 4, don; Cambridge,l - lodgson ; CoVentry, Rellason ColJ' ',; ter, Keymer ; Canterbury, Simmons •, Chatham Etherington ; Clachar ; Ches.; , Pool and 'Son ; Chichester, Phillipsan ; Cirencester, S:7l:t' l , v ', Chippenham, Combs ; Dublin, Dugdale, No. 7 , Eadi rriA,,,,i• court; Derby, Dw rery ; Durhairi, Petinm,a.m ; 0 5e; Neales ; Devizes Lowe ; Dorchester, v'irt'ue ; . li ar :mouth, lackson ; Edinburgh, Smith, North :Vl` Exeter, Tre•Wman and Son ; Falmouth ; Glasgow, M.Donalci'; Liverpool, . Headley ; Leicester; Gregory, Swinfen ; Lewes, Pitt ; rw. Margate, Rowe; Maidstone, Wal 0 ; t ;t e r r iigg P i i s t t t ; l l S :e a e l i l ls e , r l ; ino . s, Holmes ; Lincoln, Drury ; ; Newbury, Fuller, Alice ; Pi c aa, inef ilodgson ; Northampton, D.cey ; Nazt Norwich, Stevensrn :Lid Co. ; Oxto r `i c c:a n ias e amtr s li t ,eb e , o r ; ,. lAr3 (tri l uar ` i kal o lge er Jones ; 'Plymouth Dock, Hokland ; Portsm)uth, Berail;i'c L. 1 eading, Smart and Co. ; Rochester, Erherington ; Prest 4 r Sergent ; Shrewsbury, Eddowes ; Southampton, 13: 11 ‘, 6 „ - •; Stafford, Morgan; Stamford, Newcomb ; Sunderland , Salisbury, Collins ; Scarborough. Bayley ; Taunton, 1".1-11, Tunbridge Wells, Sprange ; Wells, Evill ; Wey into Wood ; Windsor, lilakeney ; and by all airliners or Genii ' Medicines in the United Kingdom. 111.11; Of whom may he had, a new Edition. being nearly _ . Hundred Pages, price only as. SOLONIOtsi's GUIDE TO I-li:ALTI I : q t r. Or advice to both sexes, on female diseases, Nervous. V,' pochondriac, and Consumptive Complaints. Ttli 13( ' ° , 1r pi recommended to young men and boys ; has been the labu.oo9, many years experience and observation on the calarni ip consequences of a secret and destruCtive vice. To whi c A r added an Essay on diseases incident to females, and an a lso pendix the subja.i of a solitary and , lestructive vic 6l an Addr7ss to Parents, Guardians, Tutu's, and those.' ft have the care and education of youth. L ikewiseadvic_efit ex.;:tainitig the mode of treatment, iii the dr Scurvy, Leprosy, King's Evil, Gout, I t e 'ai flstlaagerissin of ,an , i Vent'reed Disease; cautions to voinn; per s 'lc , the danger I mpipper connexions or iMproper trearin=:rit• a t (F r The amazing sale of this B oo k i s t h e best criter ioi 'ti vast tit!ltV.