The Sun. — London, England, 1811-11-13 00:00:00

. , ! ;1 frii„ :!.ti:Jr' ~~~e ~. iii;:...• • - f t T Mr Liao.;ll, was Intned ouf ()Nee or Ate Meng t o , , his c , he ' eaues oon„ Cetee }ou have any ,complaint to mike on teat account, go to where it is cog zable. . • , Mr M‘Neeeer—The 1.16.1 e was mentioned in 11- lustration—it mieht be lodecorous-but: - the Court wtil 'tense an error in- a cause where the warm of. fedions of the advocate's heart heart are united • with whetever,share of.understanding he possesses., revert to the may he quesnon whe • ther titer are eligible to sit as Grand • Jurotee-- The ' Ad of Paeliarrieut which constittves. the itiatitution, in one of s Cleilees, makes an imperatiVe rule upon ,theseemenicipal officers. 7 hry are always to be in -readiness tb attend from ten in the , morning .until eight at night, I see eleven of these-Police Magis. Oates in the Jury box ; first, Mr: Alderman Hot;e, and last, though net least in love, toy friend Major Sirr.—Are these persons eligible „,Whe.are titus An protect the citizens resident within the disteiet of the metropoli4, when these .Gentlemen ale . .shot up in . a Grand Jury room-eaed out of their office, which the statute imperatively Obliges them to at tend.? Clearly the intent of the Legislature Alas , that these metropolitan Magistrates should not in terfere #t any situation but that presented by the Sta . tute. The Barristers appointed cannot plead —can not even give an opinion under a penalty of live bun . dyed prelude. Bet,. confirmed Mr. M‘Nally, whatever neat be the opinion of the Court upon the challenge to the jeior, there can be no doubt of this, that the de . fetidate may, if the challetige be,overeruled e plead en abatement to the indielment, • the incompetency Qt.' OtlY Grand Juror. The Jud4eiebeieg divided in opinion, they deli- , eered their. Judgments Seriatim; 7blr. JOAO& 06110/01 stated, as-there wes.e, differ. . .cute of opinioh existing, in. tee Court, they shoulif deliver their judgment separately t—for . ,his part -lie should not take moth of the tirue of; the Courteop," butbut.in loOking thro i tigh the books .be could.ifind uo instauce ict which it . is inentionetiAliatain Grand Juror coidd.be challenged, and 41)0, in Wei opinion, lio o:et-Illicit) lay to` a Grand •juror or before, the bill of indidnient,wes foundieett would be payingliitle resped lee the common pradice in criminal law, if a novel fortn never before instanced,e was anwed to sepersede the universal practice;-- at the same. time it must be understoodathat he would consider it .a tut nstrorts evil was there no (erne for the subjed'e complaining of a Good Juror. 'There was the same disqualification ineboth Grand. Jortira .and Petit Jurors, but theeforteeewizre not the seine ; the right, hipottingin a *4,01014re- iThttit when. the bill of indiebitene, wattefound, answered all the ends of challerneing T: , O right by challenge, in the caste' of,ePeety :.furors is because. the: ;Untie wouldlapae e -the 'pritoncr is , • present, and he is called on by the terms and pudica! of the lae to challenge, which if ,Itie doeti not then, he teionot do: afterwards. lii t eases of Graud Jurors, the prisoner is • not li ettie;fit ee nor is he called upon by any form to'uhatleOge ;ler ' the means of tedreSs; in case of diSquelification in a Grand Juror, hi the pradice of ties Court, is by plea. l u lls Lordship said, he thought that Hawkins was hineself try doubt 'tor din he think the passage that was 001 td was ail opmiori, but rather a eebjea throwil o,lt n;r (qicuision. Attie Jedee Osborne.' had given, his judgment, Mr, fted , y lose and said, my Lords, Mae I be perL muted to read once short authority 2 . (...tiottee•---No, no now. Mr. Ft L Y —May I then Send the book -up Co t . ten' Loolships ? ' • (fate juseice—You are tco tale, Sir. Mr. Finlay--The authority is but a line 'and tale Cuter JUSTICIt , - ,, Wc.11„ read ire ', r. Fielay—Mr. Jettice oshordelaid e thet Mete is lii Law Book in which' it its that a Gi and Juroteconle be challenged.' On the'dootrery, l'hielde a bon% in. my'hand, iniiAilebitia , 4m:rit ion ed, that Grend Jeror may be 'eh:lll*kt The . bete: Woud's Inset mese and unefi;T the title, G, and Juror, I nod the following unequivocal sett . rence t A Grand -Juror may be challenged for . cause, be indietment Couto!. CHILD. Jusetce—Why, that is the siogle.case in • Bacon's Abridgment, taken front elawkienee , pleree taf dill CkW r ni, and whiclehas been so often clewed; Ntr. NLA Y —My ford, it is not a ilinglo caw; there are thin cases, Judges DA and '4, Doe fig•-•"WiIY 7 those; three. vises, are but the one. They .aret e etil they rest on the case ofWhetipotel e teretesseoannot h e ar them e have 'heard them alreatlyeee Mr. Finlay r:at. down. Mr. Justice DALY stated , tha t the challenge was for persons holding places at will under the Croivne, ' tie leoked iteon it to b no snore than founded 'upon Serjeant npinion, in which the au thooties referred to in the margin do not bear him out ; 'he case 'relied upon is that of Sir William Whitiipoo!, which ia'srpunded upon the statute of Henry ;,,bat he. t hoeght. that if a challenge lay, it evoole have been Mentioned, and that it -would mot [ewe betel by' plea', and the indielment declared herdahip /incited a eeattite of Henry winch said the remedy heretofore wee not suffiCient ; yet it givea no remedy by challenge.— All - the objeetiolie ‘l, ere certainly. equelly the, same 0 4 to the *Gland or Pctit Jeror, but the form is liti;• - fert , :tt ; tri tiro t Petit Jury it is by challenge; it) Ulu Gelid Jitry it is by flea of Abatement. Judge. : 13 ' laine'nted he must differ from , Court ~ having heard nothing to Aeke-the uniturin opinion he hed eeterteined ever sinee'lle had diret opened: ► hiw hook„ that it was' eio los.: competent for the 'atibjeet to challenge a Grand 'Juror than a Pi'trit Juror. If he was in error, he had the -Cora fellation to err in good company ; in cc mpanv with n a e l ei rei , Bacon, Wood, and with the e ! ,ligi,t e e e e and distiuguished Judge, I ,or carkton, w pot in the liobit ,of con imittieg himself el a bly, or upon ill-considered grounds. **W.' Witittipuel'o case in Cro. Car, warrnted, its his opinien e the. Position leid down by that ,cluster of authuritieB.-,.., 'There, tt gre,it try of the twelve .Judges, held, that the 11 If. 4, e. 9, extended ere pereone Al(lt Li\v'ed tti per, - ,nal actions ; ter, (e#o tlie b 9 ok they ;Ire n 01 . et I egaes to he y,vgym an iii envie, and may ee iediel'iged tor Opt „tiinjo , . !6..g. The 3erete, sworn before the Corouer, aTe „pan t'`d Jorors, and the verdia pronounced try tiiern is in the e'attee of on (ipOti Which the pOrty 'rney and lewd by a, _Ve..tit Jury; thee: 4 :U the ; Gtatut betoa , a Coron'i\r be chillenged, why nay not thOse impannelled b!.- fort Justices of Oyer - and Terninter ? It - is admit. ,•• • ted .that ohjettiors lay 'to Liralig Jurors, at common lain; as want of frethold,'outhxwry, &e. Then; how was the subjeet •to 'avail l'aMself of theseA. je6tions before the statute of Henry 4, which gives the plea in abatement, unless by challenge ? And if the -subjett bad that privilegt at commbn what has happened to dprive hitn of it Not the stat. Henry 4 ; for that is a rernedial.stattite; not substituting the plea in' abatement; after ifdlh tntut, for challenge, before indicitnent,:but:auxiii ary defeaive common law - privilege of chal lenge.—lt was egregiously defective in this, that 'the person charged was either in prison, or not amena ble, :or • ignorant of 'any information preferred against bitn ; •anil thus, not being present; or.en had not the opportunity - of challenging — any of 'the Grand Jury.--The statute; therefore, recitibg„ that monk we .e thus indilied. against the course of the' conunnn law, that is, by persons agaibsi : who:n le : gal'objeaions lay, gave the plea in abatement, ter' indiameitt.' It is true, HaWkins doubts Whe titer the plea in abatement was not corniSetenf.at ,cOmtnon. law, as it t t Henry 4.; was hut deektra tory. But Lord Coke ex!sreNsly denies that doe- Jtine, and affirms • that 'the plea was given by the statute. • It -is objected; that , the inconvenience of such prtvilt..o woull greitly c - robLirrals ttia admiiii3ita lion of justice; but great constitutiottal . .privileges are not to be put down by arguments .ob inconvi. , Wu MUM not argue from the abuse of the thing to the WC id it. TI at argument would ship the subjedt ,of some of his roost legitimate and ile.- knowicdged privileges—becauie eery Judgektiows. how often they are abused, to the great, antioyaace of the Court, and the waste of much priteious time. lf, -becauke the right of thallenge 111# be ahueed,,,it .15.014 that, therefore; it does..noi the same argument would take away the rft:.tutablt, plea itz ;tb:.ttement, wind - s• alight be exercised vexatiously. • ' iihother objeaion., is, that the is no instance to . be found in the books, 01 a challenge to a Grand Jurur. But that is easily. answered. SltiLe- the bta ture giving the plea, the privilege of challenge need not beresorted to. The party's absence leaves him seldom the opportunity of chalknging ; and though he were present, the plea is abatement would be t tie more 'eligible remedy. But a privilege bediiiies itot obsolete or lost by desuetude. Upon the whole; ilveretere, he was of opinion, that that proud .bulwark of civil liberty, the'Grand Jury,. would be de(e6tive without the right, of elthl lone ; • ;old that tho option of challenge before, ot a plea atto.•itidictinent, War open to the subject. But, ,upon the s , , , cond ground, relied upon bythe Solicitor-General, that . it lay not with the subject to r.hailenge >a Aaratid juror, for fayotir to the Crown, Judge bay was clearly- of opinion with him; 11 Lord Holt denied 'the right . of. challenging for f;wour ira< the CaSC of a Petit Jury, who try the pri• sorer for h:s life, (1 firrtiori„ it would follow, that nu such conic of , cloilenge existed in the case of the Grand inry, who only accuse, the priwner, and send him to utal, What: could be more revolting or rucl notOnalili, tll3ll to. where the Crown was nut persirgly, but merely in its llotitical character - ,.cort. eerticd ton it (71,6'd lin interest in theltecusa. tion of au inuocottrittbiect ? Upon .the whole,, while be admitted the gcneral poAer of the wbject challenge.a Grand Juror, he concurred witla the Court upon the latter grotto,' . 0 reJectiog the challenge now uttered. . The Clizr hiSTICR delivered liis opinion w thn following ffect application is a novelty of great public ono.. sequence. It is the first time that we have heat of a Juror being challenged, antecedent to , the ,finding of a bill of indictment. In all cases, certainly, the subject to challenge either a Grand or a Petit Jury ; the only question is the Mode of dOing it. If the person accused has a valid objection to 'a Grand Juror, undoubtedly he ought to take th 6 ' cry first opportunity to make it and yet, - look into every Isook that relates.to the law, and ybu. win find a single instance of a challenge Gratt . d,loty was sworn. I have examined: the State Trials, where it would . be supposed to be . found, . which might have been expected twfurnish abun dant instances of challenges, and yet I cannot find a single: case similar to the practice. Universal 'pm , tee therefore, a powerful argument., to' spew that challenges made in this manner will not A challenge, will not lie where no undue favohr can he . shewn; and With good reason—for otherWite every. . person who might or might not be indicted, might come in and object to a Jury: there are a n umbel' of cases where Jurymen are objectcd'to by and 1101 . 10 where. they are challenged ; this practice thews what the rule is. It would be monstrous if .ICartb jeet could not chew - that- a Grand Jury kid no I:'g it right to accuse him, and it he had it not by plea, he should have it bychallenge. If the subject, therefore, has a sound ohjetstinti to a JUryinan, he does not lose this benefit t:l it when he conies to plead, he may object to - the in. dictritent. The universal' praetice i t against lenges, and in liti.ottr of a plea. The Chief Jtisuc:e then . ; adverted to the quot.ition Which had been made from Hawkins, -which, 'he .was of opinion . ,w,t3 by' no intNins clear or decisive—in fict„ liawktui had railed a question tweet the point, and had lett ii undecided. Plea, and not challenge, is the Mode the party ft is, and we would encontber the adnai in%tr,ition of justice with difficulties, if we allowed atly.ot tier. It is safest and best to proceed by that mode which had been establi:thed for btisiness, anti wt,i,,h it had bei'n now aitentpted fnt'ibe first titne _ to.cl.t tit film). Tbe opinion of .1 he Court That the litv lit of Challenge should be disallowed." titst lc aid riot ask t it!) as a ',nil Out as au indulgence. Mr. O'Cotnat.i, suggNed to the Uourt; how the Officer be authoilsed to give copies, if -fie was not 01447'41 to give thrill ? Judge I)4mrreptied, t-Itat-he titight be- authoristal by the order of the Court, yet the Court not be coin yelled to grant the copies. • The CHIRP JUsrica said, that this statute does not inf er compulsion I nor does it in any of its Erten eltdoge the law.. The Court interfere. with the Coutisel Tor the Crciwn. Mr. BVRNit rote en ,the part of the Delegates, and argued very ingeniously on their right to the cOpies, disclaiming it as afailoui... at: considered the right as atre4ing • both the plea and -the • 4e fence of the` accused ;—there were some which could not be toide bout having tho.c:(44* of :the intormatinns—,as 'the plea of ,4uferNs acgi/it. For this he must ascertain ; the prosectitor and the charge;--oor gOierally, as , set forth, in ..the .as in tl , e informal.. tions. , —S'oppose two transatlions in. the fame .day, 'how- could then accused know for al bleb: le.w.as inditled ? In making bis defence,' he.4oull those . copies, that he may 6bserVeatw,verinace be ts.yeetv'the,proseeutor's written exarninatibm, nrtd 'oral testialpoy; and.,for this IVIr. - 13urne instanced Lord &afford's case, in the State 'Fri JudeDALY.—ln thdt case ibey were given on ,'the trial, it >t Mr. IlultNE.--•-flicre is intich difference in a rapi 'f'd/ ca o," as at law the plisoaer has no other Counsel th in the Judge; whe.has seen the in ! . formation, . . Judge DAY.—He is so in all casts. All. Be tiNE..4- , -But Coupsel is allowed in rnisde ine.moursotny, to points'of law aptl in those cases he shourd have the same opportunity of seeing the informations as ;lie Judge has. How, otherwise, is the Couti.el to a4ceruiin any coniradittion between the infotmations and the evscience ? The CHIEF' -JusTICE.—It is not, necessary, be,. c:pyse all' Catk:S the Judge Is the Counsel tor Abe„ accused. • Judge DAY. , ---Many caws of misdearneanoorsAcr cur in which the prisoner has no Counsel, ,And throws himself wholly on the *lodge. Mr. BORNE recapitulated liht - arguments, and con , . tended, that, without copies of the informations, the accused could not be 'sufficiently prepared either ler his plea or .his defence. The . CHIE JUSTICE (the other, three Judges concurring), in delivering the Opinion of ihe , Courts observed, that the present application was entlrely. novel, It presuines a right in an accused persen.;9 search into the evidence which was intended., 3 1 Ycin on the part of the Crown. No prosecutor can be compelled to diselose his evidence. His Lordship noticed the English ,statute of the Third, which allows copies of the indinments in cases of High Treason; but expressly forbids the witnesses' names being indorsed thereon—and it gives no copies, of information4.-I'be Irish statute 4 G. 111. c. 21, gives copies of the ilidielmentain High Treason, hut not of the' in(ormations, , The ob- Joel here is,. to procure the names of the witres - ses, which is an. unreasonable application : it is suffi cient for the accused to know the faicl with which be is charged ; but be..is not to..be armed with a know ledge of the prosecutor's proofs, The motion can- . not be granted. . ' . • The motion was accordingly Termed. MAI I.S. A lilt v ID—.lGtiernuty, i ti4galand o Dublin. Due—t Cadiz, t Uutunccy, 2 fersey, 3 iituteritittt. PRICIE OF S. - COCKS • •• Tilts 'DAY A r TwitLvfl•co'cr.ottc. • -64 i I Red, Ann. - TII E S N. , • soLlnt Quls atetkt rit.t.Sum 1ti.71,1t AT ? S4Ttni.DAY, Nov. 9, This 'day Trir. W, JOH zcsori, PS Connsel :on the part of the 111:tigats, moved, t bat. Copies of Iffe` To formation, 1,1.1001' be granted to them. This, tie obintve,l, he bad before asked 11'04 che PAM 33 a matter of jhtiour, and not ass a right) nor did 4e now see; airy cause, (if alts tiag his opinion, Thq Learned Conngel it the statute, 49 Geo. 111, which allowed to the. Clerk of the Crown' a tee 01 Bd, for every copy of rhisdeatneanout:i, which he Was timhorst.,l to give , arid this, as he it. diti. not t tie right, at kast knowledsed: the I , ractice. concluded with L N "9 , WEDNV.SDAY, 0,4,1811. Thu &nut has ,arrived at. Porl4month lion) C3g liari, having on board Mr. Smyrkt, Secretary ct Legation to the Court of Sardinia, and a foreigner, of dislinetion, charged with dispatches, ~~ Our squadion in the Adriatic has; as ustl:11, !;fen extremely active. The boats of the iigierull Littiy. captured 8 vessels laden with grain and provisibns; burnt ten others, and also took three gliti.:boati by which they wcricoitvoyed; withouL i the loss of a man. • We are happy to learn, by the last accounts from the South of Spain, that General Ilm.Asirsaos pur. stied the French on their retreat ilOOl Si. AOCh, aid harassed them very mach. Ile has taken several prisoners anchtomc baggne, Paris Papers to tho fith hist, have.reacl.vd town we hive matte some extraas from them. Buir:A- Piklifii: still remained , in flullinfl; Wheiher 'be detained there by the unsettled state of that' ettorttty . ;: or by.his desire to bring his fiegociations Akith , the' Northern Powers to 'a Conclusion befOre he returns, tp... Paris, we do not: know but we..are inclined to . think. that he is influenced by .the latter motive. We ate convinced hy the manner in which . the French Papers speak of the war between the Raii. Siang and 71.11t,i, that. BUONA PARTE is highly dis sati,fied With the Court of Petersburgh. These PApers contain some details respeeling the proceed ingsin Spain. • The private Letters brought by the Liiitning from Buetioi Ayres state, that the differences be tween the Junta of that city , sod ELIO, the Gover nor of Monte. Video, are nit tbe-point of being.ad justed. ELIO sent Olive deputies to Beenos Apes, vAti piotinsed - teethe bt - iccnninn 1 ition to the Jon: ta, all of which were agreed to, except a propOsi .tian relative to the degree of power with which ato is to remain invested ; but it was supposed ti4l,4e difficulties, even upon that point, would bs surmounted. Aemillsell•MO The laters which have been received from Awe. rica by the Dispatch packA are of a more pcitic nature than . those which have recently reached e', nod - we understand' that orders have been sent to g s catintrY for 'lart; e quantities of goods. Co neat expeclations are also held dot, that as soon.as Con grvess meets; • all rest rie,tions upon trade will be taken off. We hope that these expeetations ;,t ill tutu out to b . ; well 'founded ; but we are by no means sure bbat - itbe extent of the orders given by the Americo merchants for 'goods from. thus Country, is a proof that, they do not expect a rupture. An idle re rrt was in circulation at Norfolk, that a large Fretic fleet had . made its appearance in the West Indies. . . This morning a Flag°land Mail arrived, 1 4 which we received the ibllowing article of 41 01 ' ; 1 genre <-- 014 14 :- IG : ND, Nov. 8.-41119, Illttrairg kiEt.O,LA ,from Bahram- (3n island on the coast of EastOes' land hetweenthe Ems and the Wese r ) 3 salW i t 1 part of the garrison of that isla nd, • having deefte4 the French service, and co me over to oter iota a° 'British army. They are m ostl y Oklenbargh°,. who had been forced into the service by the C esld scription, their dislike to which had been aug alt* ed by the harshness of their Commanding a ;'s?viitcp maltreated and beat "them on . the roost triding I Occasions, - 'and the extreme irregularhy, with 4 41 i they were paid and viaualled. Sonie 00 siO e ' they they had formed the resolution of making their escape; 'and' having been rcwoced to Ballow, I.l'l I seized the• occasion Of the wind being fft °3(l g i a v t : ' ‘ h h e s b l e r ell : e rs e ) : e e b l h t ly h ta t O Feh t f de r,e c a ey i s i ds i : P t r i nc l ri i andy e t : r 'it it ih e o i inne‘ntig:rinepnt;.lalceitol to inb m rteso. t i a s e S liF i noern:ect execution a 1: O i t ni I : d e 3''l ; : vii : 1113 : ::::' f'l6eir desigos, they also bayonetted; and th rel/te • threatened brought here as pr i s w o 6 n n e nF l ell s o h eph o P ; P l s d ieldv tl attec y t9hien;dl;ll3llll;ll' the least alarm. They then seized U pon the b' 3l ": nwl-compliance, and arrived here in safety a te it was impoS hours after embarkation. • The garrison consisted of tifj men', but from bay. ju g families and'9ther coon alter on the eaaitinatitr. Icloleu'ldMaasntdertowtirtahnisnP:tratritthdeamirthhitihnecasr' 6;110 plan. Those v; ° ed.tlle Germa n r e y a s r o e ld sPetlion, and s i 41 e h for atrirliev remainderimnia itZtepraisr.ill:4 tia'f, Legion. in an speak teoakokoftbthecodatthgrtaodistelgrvievainan. th e e r inG'o7l;3:: who' are generallycontinuica Ooantryi• and making the most invidious c0w1...1c-1 sans between them and the Frenehsoldiers.. 1100.1 r i s ly i n up h : r o . iiFfliirdc:cnotigeld' : l e i b e r y l v n i 43 ; . :' ‘ i- , ': e i r i l i l a r ,1 1 ::: 3 ::: c. urinal, i n : i !t h a a rn si e t re is t s r e ifi la e o , an mi c thataliici little m or l e than, ,o. nished by Government delivearednd'tivlvertib)r°gyrie°lli:llirilij:". laxity: • . , .. last _ . as .... 7gain p j r: Y ro e g st a e tiot aVnildri,i‘avrilent metprPourroiguellencl to ° I I I " : eta ii: r n !.l,l rY e; . ereis was received yester.d o Y . fr°lll W .- ill t ti ; !Pr!.,,1 ork House, suiting, that•his iNik°?o,,t, llaer2tionie sleep during the, night, but is not Getter, , An .., exPlesS was received troth Windsor 1145t.,1410tt at. zork House, stating, " t hat his /4,0110..0 .b'e a n - much depressed during the day, and oli ter in either mental or bodily health." , I to A new door is made 111. the western side 0' 2 0 House of Lords, corresponing with ihe oe w S i r t o s in ea s 't s s a i t n id ti n te la b it ot it l l y g b o e f lo th w e 11-Ihoeußsea,r,aasr.:lo3l as 0 1! " poi - i i , i; entrancel .! i i a i therein, ti 3 t i cciltii r e Y u n a t s to g: os : ai n n a l i r r s sa t t ' il l i :t e p l ir :e r,vi s dr e N t e i ‘ c e l le ‘ : l e er rn ti l i , n t- l i f d a . r i r t sd th f ee P , is i raldarci:iti irtiltill;;;;:r(its3::‘,);,:t0;:11 Intl ,l'ealoo.:Xceedingly well treated, and loog l , 1 • curly, nu :Nr;boln9i:anys°lhcelße4nctaPtirlid:rctn°l9acinieal RPreapja:e::°';,%tbe, e P ts cr onl c in E se l iip i- of e eh o ini c isb N o i , o s f po t rs h ipo ec tril t v o lo l at l se o ti w v:.. .... i s tig ea C ii o n a g y i ii! n ia o co s :: o ' l , l„. Jane M:tls, alias COI "ki Bsh P h° trior, ~ agnus ru , • 0,114 !Cll.'t*c:ttllZ?•-..—rs3 ', a rm (' K M e S n rY t, ls:- toilirgr'ettli)trr:ine3gli1;151)(T)1111:01)t)1014; ti?ri--Morgan Davis, for a line Olf.nce--..rohn fl"lin alms gin4b, tor burglary—Nial y Joiteg, let s t , e drv ..-. 'lir'ti:a'':al*tleataY Si"keatfiStlll;t7ll,lll;tittrianhlOrilstl'el:ltne:Stit:lrgl.tirligV;lll.ll:l2",%lll*' Bradt(); d, for stealing il 3 dwelling baule- I )°s ' bet!) Field, for sieiding pnvately4loP"--„,tiey, Burnham, for highway robbery--Willialt) i'" lo t for stealing in a dwelling house.--Daniel Pvibte.., stealing a letter., containing a 01. t.1141‘- °L e t. Sarah Green alias Clayton, for stealing in a ow for lin,g bottle. 'When Win, BaSil W3S °r<lerd ' •-exveution on Monday next. A duel was fought neat Cornhe Wooitt ° ll M i v ( V, day lattr, hetsseen a Lieutenant Smith, and v. Coulhourne, in cowevuence °fan itdprol'er I ' 6e 113 i f n al le 0 log bten made by 11;e Lieutenant, 0. the •••- I ,, it bli Mr. Coulbourne's -sister. A tier tv.ro coo 01 i 1 , ,,,.,,,, bad been discharged, the Otti,:er made an opou ,? which was accepted , and the air4r lldcd. ~'r ,~ g . .:~. , j CIA of or,