The Sun. — London, England, 1853-08-02 00:00:00

The result was that the amendment of Lord Monck was carried by a majority of 24. Some other alterations were made in the clause, for the purpose of rendering it conformable in all its provision to the amendment. On the question that the bill do pass. Sir W. VERNER wished hon. members in this country were really aware of the nature and objects of the bill. It was the first step to put down the gentry of Ireland, and replace them by Chartists and Repealers, and was the re sult of certain meetings held by hon. members of that house, who had combined against every Government that did not give them their demands. The first thing they demanded was the tenant-right ; now they demanded the destruction of the gentry. At a meeting held at Bells, in the county Meath, Mr. Lucas had said he and his col leagues were sent to Parliament for the purpose of op posing every Government who did not establish religious equality and the principle of Sharman Crawford's Bill. They pledged their words—they pledged their souls—they adjured the high and holy name of God, that they would abide by those pledges. But no ssoner had they got into Parliament than they broke those pledges. He wished to call the attention of the house to the advice given by the Chief Secretary of Ireland—according to the statement of the hon. member for Meath. (Cries of Divide and Ques tion.) But no sooner had that right hon. gentleman got into office than he changed his tone. The select commit tee was appointed on the subject of tenant-right, and the right hon. gentleman had refused to admit two members from his (Sir W. Verner's) side of the house on the com mittee. As long as conciliation and expediency continued to be the policy of the Government there would be no peace for Ireland. (Laughter and hear.) The bill was then passed. TENANTS' COMPENSATION (IRELAND) BILL. On the motion that the Tenants' Compensation Bill be read a third time, Sir W. VERNER said he thought that the bill should be extended to England, and he had a motion to that effect ; but, under the circumstances, he should not pass it. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL for Ireland brought up an additional clause. Mr. CAIRNS wished to know the nature of the clause. It appeared to him to give the tenant power to hold the land until compensation should be made. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL for Ireland said the clause had been prepared by the right hon. member for the University of Dublin, and its object was to give the tenant reasonable time to put forward his claim for com pensation previous to ejectment for any clause except non payment of rent or breach of covenant. Mr. GROGAN said the clause enlarged the powers of 'the bill in favour of the tenant very materially, and he thought it would only hamper the working of the bill to adlvt it. In fact, it was not necessary. Mr. V. SCULLY said the bill would be nugatory unless the clause were added to it. He (Mr. Scully) had pressed a clause to the same effect to a division, but it was nega• gatrved. The only objection he had to the clause before the house was that it did not go far enough. The house then divided— For the clause Against it ........................ Diajority Sir A. BROOK- . 113 . 32 . -81 --- 4'4"OliE protested against the unjustifiable manner in which Irisii house. lie was Quite property s was voted awa y i n th a t members wh o vo t ed s atisfied that two-thi r d s o f th e on they were voting about.t I f question did not kn ow w h a t it would be anoth er t h ing, b it were a questi on o f p r i nc i p l e tit relat e d t o proper t y. Th e hon. and learned gentleman rild that the clause was pre ofpared by the hon and learn member for the University Dublin, but that was no rec endation of the mea sure, which he (Sir A. Brooke)rClaii.o hesitation in saying was disapproved of by the whole ‘-30ngervative party in Ireland. members in Lord J. RUSSELL—No doubt ma w ,. b r , this house vote without fully understa-nor tons on which they may vote—no doubt l : 3 ae an v , eral quea this house are given in confidence. The ho m -'"„ '''''a in this side of the house voted on the present on full confidence—a confidence which lam sorrytali°nll,l ini blamed by the hon. baronet —in the character, the 1 --- ' 8 jug, and the ability of the late Attorney-General for e Ie" land. (Hear.) I cannot a g ree with the hon. baronet' therefore. I have the highest opinion of the right hon: gentleman the member for the University of Dublin, an d I consequently protest against the attack made against him in his absence. Few persons in this house possess that right hon. gentleman's knowledge of the law as it relates to Ireland—none have given the subject of the bill greater care and deeper attention. (Hear.) lam very sorry, un der the circumstances, that the hon. baronet cannot agree with him, but at any rate we must still retain our confi dence in the right hon. and learned gentleman. (Hear.) Mr. MAGUIRE said the property of Ireland was quite as much in the labour of the tenant as in the land of the landlord. English members had no occasion whatever to be alarmed at this concession to the Irish tenant, The clause did not go far enough, for it did not give compensa tion in the case of eviction for non-payment of rent. Th e clause was then added to the bill. Colonel DUNNE complained that no notice of these amendments had been given. The SOLICITOR -GENERAL fo r IRELAND said they had been all fully discussed in for the purp ose of carrying committee, and were only hon. and learned member e out th e pl e d ges g ive n by the Mr. M`CARTHY moved the the Univer s ity o f D u blin. the omission of the 14th clause. The house then divided, when there appeared— For the clause Against it .. ........... ..... , ..................... 10(3 Majority ...... .... ... .... ................ 31- 7 ,... The SOLICITOR-GENERAE . 1 : (; . .................. . ai the end of the same clause, then propo i Ld insertion of a proviso, that no claim should be allowedtile ittnprovements manta, unless, within twelve months of tter any improve being made,. they shall be registered by the declaration is made of the nature and value ofetritnig d v : m enu. gr, - .iergeant t r 3.IIEE apprehended that if th o Provizo . ome questions to him themselves. He was sorry to be obliged to state, however, that the result of that examina tion upon the part of the committee had been anything but satisfactory. Upon the morning subsequent to the day upon which the examination to which he alluded had taken place, the evidence given by Toiler had still con tinued to be of a very contradictory character, and under those circumstances the committee felt that they were jus tified in taking the course which they had adopted. He was, however, bound to admit that the circumstances of the case was of a very peculiar character. Toiler was evidently a man of a very excitable temperament. He h a d been in custody for nearly a fortnight, and under all th© circumstances of the matter he (Mr. Hamilton) believed that the ends of justice had been sufficiently attained, and he felt assured that he only spoke the sentiments of his colleagues in the committee in stating that it was desirable that Toiler should now be discharged from custody. Mr. W. PAI.C.EN then moved that Robert Toiler should be discharged upon payment of his fees. He was ready to produce the surgeon who had granted the certificate in the case to testify to the truth of what the petitioner had alleged. Mr. C. West, surgeon, then appeared at the bar of the house and gave it as his opinion that further confinement would prove seriously injurious to the health of R. Toiler The motion for his discharge was accordingly agreed to. ADMISSION OF STRANGERS TO THE GALLERIES OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS DURING DIVI SIONS. The SPEAKER announced that preparations had been made for carrying out the wishes of the house upon this subject. When the house was about to proceed to a divi sion he should direct strang ers to withdraw, upon which the Serjeant-at-A rms would take care that the seats be neath and in front of the strangers' gallery were cleared. The occupants, however, of the remaining portion of the gallery would be allowed to retain their seats while the division proceeded. LANDLORD AND TENANT (IRELAND) BILL. I:Tpon the motion of Mr. G. H A MTI - 4TON, this bill was read a third time. The question that it do pass having been put, Mr. GOOLD moved the omission from the 10th clause of the words " not exceeding one acre." The SOLICITOR-GENERAL for IRELAND o pposed the amendment. After some observations from Lord .Morrex and Mr. V. SCULLY the amendment was withdrawn. Viscount MONCK moved the omission of the words "growing corn, grass, hops, and roots, frui ts, an d roposing produce,' from the 71st clause. His objec t i n p oh e other that amendment was to prevent the re- introdu ction c o ro f t r h s e . very objectionable right of distraining That right had never existed in untillrelandgr year 1846 in corn -1816, and it had been abolished in the y the year pliance with a recommendation of In moving that amendment he stoo d , vative ground, for he was the th D er eer efO u re7 mm on c ias on i s o e n r- . p t ro hi vi ngs sio as ns t in hey th w e were. the th a existing carried He admitted that there w fo er r e le m av a i n n n which would effect valuable im provements law, but he should rather se e p lo r s o t ve a l i n to . a g n e ta th ill er with the words to which he was then objecting. Mr. G. A. HAMILTON s aid it was true t hat the power which landlords had formerly possessed of distraining growing crops had been repealed in the year 1846, in con formity of the Devon commission, of But landlor ds had been en fohrPcilityhewiht b a ee - na mem ber. placed w by that measure in a worse position than other creditors, who might seize the crops as well as any other goods of a debtor. The result that many frauds and scenes of 'violence had arisen in consequence of tenants having entered into collusive arrangements with persons who ob tained executions against them and then seized their grow ing crops, so that the landlords had no means of recovering the rents to which they were entitled. The bill then before the house contained many clauses of a mitigatory character as regarded the recovery of rent. For instance, under the existing law a landlord had the power of distrain ing for any amount of rent that might be due to him ; but by that measure the power of distraint to be possessed by a landlord was limited to the amount of a year's rent. Again, a landlord had the power under the existing law of issuing a warrant of distress signed by himself or his agent ; while under that bill he would be obliged to make an ap plication to a magistrate, who alone could issue such a warrant. His right hon. and learned friend (Mr. Napier), who had prepared that bill, did not think it proper to deny altogether to the landlord the right of distraining 8 11 :ming crops; but he (Mr. Hamilton) had to state that his right hon. friend was prepared still further to mitigate that iiower. He proposed the introduction of an amendment which would make that clause applicable to those cases only in which a landlord was prepared to swear before a magistrate that he had reason to believe that a tenant intended to cut the crop with the view to evade the payment of his rent. His right hon. friend wished that the clause should be further amended by the insertion of a proviso to the effect that a landlord who should distrain a growing crop should not be entitled to any expenses for watching the property beyond those which he might have incurred during a period of fourteen days. He hoped that the house would accede to those proposals, and would not adopt the amendment of his noble friend. A division then took place under circumstances which were to us of a very novel character. Strangers were, as usual, ordered to withdraw ; but, in conformity with the role which the house had adopted about an hour pre viously, this order applied to those strangers only who occupied seats in the speaker's gallery and on the benches below the bar, both of which communicate with the por tions of the building appropriated to the use of members. All persons in the " Strangers' gallery" and in the " Re porters' gallery" were, for the first time, left undisturbed throughout the division. Two minutes were allowed to elapse before the closing of the outer door of the house ; and then the speaker having put the question that the words proposed be left out should stand part of the bill, directed that the "ayes" should pro ceed to the right lobby, and the "noes" to the left lobby. The members accordingly proceeded to the lobbies at either side of the outer and the inner doors ; and in those 'lobbies, and just out of our sight, their names as they were returning to the house were told off. The numbers having been made known to the Speaker by the " Tellers," were announced by the right hon. gen • tleman to have been— Ayes Noes • were introduced it would seriously damage the bill. When ever the tenant made an improvement he would be obliged to consult an attorney, in order not to forego a claim at some future time upon his landlord. The only way the bill was calculated to do good was to encourage amicable arrangements, instead'of litigation, between landlord and tenant. Colonel DUNNE, on the contrary, believed that the in sertion of the proviso would prevent any litigation, and encourage amicable feelings between those parties, if the nature and value of the improvements were recorded at the time they were made, instead of searching for evidence some years after they were made. Mr. MAGUIRE did not think there were the slightest grounds for the introduction of the proviso. Sir J. YOUNG thought it was of the greatest importance that a correct and accurate statement of the value of the improvements should be registered at the time they were made. He believed it would have the effect of preventing much litigation and misunderstanding between landlords and tenants. • Mr. BRADY moved, as an amendment, that the time should be extended to two years. After some conversation, in which Mr. F. Scully, Mr. Maguire, Mr. Grogan, and the Solicitor-General for Ire land took part, The house divided on the amendment of Mr. Brady, when there appeared— For the insertion of " two years" Against it lO6 —7l Majority Mr. FITZGERALD objected to the proviso, as likely to hh disputed a h n y d making it conclusive on lead to litigation, requiring, as it did, the tenant to file a declaration forthwith of claims landlord, forlcompen s ation,ees him ; thus compelling him to dispute it. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL for IRELAND said the proviso • had been framed by the learned member for Dublin University, and was in accordance with the bill as origi nally framed. Mr. CAIRNS thought this was not so, and that it would lead to litigation. Mr. J. BALL objected to the proviso. Mr. GEORGE supported it, as necessary to protect the landlord from the sea of claims about to be thrown upon him. Mr. Serjeant SHEE pressed the Government to with draw the proviso. Sir J. YOUNG could not assent to this; for the proviso was necessary, not only to protect the landlord, but the purchaser, otherwise it would be impossible to know what amount of indefinite claims was hanging over a property. Let it be recollected that the bill had a retrospective ope ration, and that withi n a s h or t ti me o f th e act passing every in Ireland would b e p ossesse d o f it s provis i ons. Now, it was impossible but that they should know what improvements, if any, they had effected, and could have no difficulty in registering them. He did not see how this could lead to litigation. Undoubtedly he could not deny that this part of the measure opened a difficult and danger ous course of legislation. (Hear, hear.) The Government held themselves bound, however, to pursue that course— (ironical cheers)—because the late Government had brought in a measure on a subject—(renewed ironical cheers)—and because without it the tenant-right would be endangered The house divided-- For the proviso Against it . 107 . 35 . -72 Majority The bill then passed. MERCHANT SHIPPING SEAMEN'S BILL This bill was read a third time. Mr. CARDWELL brought up a clause, which was added. Sir J. GRAHAM brought up a clause :—" In cases where salvage services are rendered by any ship belonging to her Majesty, or by the commander or crew thereof, no claim shall be made or allowed for any loss, damage, or risk thereby caused to such ship, or to the stores, tackle, or furniture thereof, or for the use of any stores or other articles belonging to her Majesty, supplied in order to effect the salvage service, or for any other expense or loss sus tained by her M a j es t y by reason of such services." Mr. HUME approved of the principle, but it did not go far enough.. It was di sgrace f u l to theßoyal Navy that they should claim salvage in any cases, instead of being eager to save life or property for the honour of the service. Admiral WALCOT indignantly denied this, and declared that there was nothing discreditable in the claim of salvage. The navy were always ready to discharge their duty to humanity in the saving of life, but when they preserved property at the peril of their own lives, they were fairly entitled to salvage, and the " merchant princes" of Eng land would be ashamed to grudge it them. (Cheers.) Sir G. PECHELL supported the clause. Sir G. TYLER thought that these calumnies should not be heaped upon British officers and seamen for merely doing that which an act of Parliament compelled them to do. (Hear, hear.) Mr. MITCHELL observed that the case of the Rosalind, which occurred under the control of the Board of Admi ralty, was one of the worst and most flagrant abuses of the law of salvage that could be pointed at. (Hear.) Sir J. GRAHAM said, as r carded the particular case of the ship Rosalind, it would' be inexpedient to pursue the discussion further, inasmuch as it was now pending before a court of law. (Hear.) The clause was then added to the bill. Mr. HUTT moved the addition of a clause requiring all ships of the navy and merchant service, yachts, and trans ports to contribute in equal proportions to the lighthouse tolls and dues. The SPEAK - RR decided the clause could not be enter tained. Mr. HUTT next moved the omission of clauses 33, 34, and 35, relative to seamen volunteering into the navy, and to substitute, in lien thereof, the following clause : " Whereas, it is expedient that seamen should no longer be permitted to desert the vessels in which they are en gaged for the purpose of entering into her Majesty's service, be it enacted, that the 50th and 51st sections of the act of the Bth year of her present Majesty, chap. 112, shall be repealed ; and it shall not be lawful for any officer in her Majesty's service knowingly to permit or encourage any seaman to leave the vessel in which he is engaged ; and every seaman leaving his ship and entering into her Ma jesty's service shall be liable to all the penalties of deser tion, any law or custo m no t w ith s t an di ng ." Mr. CARDWELL wished to impress upon the house the fact that this bill had special reference to the interests of shipowners, and was framed greatly for their advantage. The question now was whether they would take this power of receiving volunteers out of the hands of the Admiralty, or suffer it to be exercised by them in the most cautious and restricted manner? (Hear, hear.) He could assure the house that the provisions of this bill were alike bene ficial to the shipowners and seamen; and that all exercise of power on the part of the navy—as regarded the matter referred to by the clause of the hon. gentleman—would be watched and regulated with the most jealous restriction. Mr. HUME said the practice of receiving volunteers from merchant vessels tended greatly to break up the discipline of the merchant crews ; and, therefore, men-of-war should not be allowed to take seamen volunteers from the mer chant vessels without the sanction of the merchant cap tains. (Hear, hear.) Mr. HORSFALL said the shipping interest did not com plain of the naval service having the power to receive sea men from the mercantile marine, but of its being invested with the power of taking them. He believed, however, that the evil was not quite so great as many of the ship owners imagined, for it appeared by the return recently published that the number of seamen who bad been so taken was exceedingly small. The principal evil consisted in the fact of the seamen knowing that as soon as a man of-war hove in sight he was at liberty at once to go on board her ; and he had it upon the authority of masters of vessels themselves, that this frequently produced a degree of insubordination amongst their crews that hon. members could have no conception of. (Hear, hear.) He was cer tain that whenever a merchantman fell in with a man-of war in want of hands which she could supply, she would gladly do so at all times ; and he believed there was such a good understanding between the two services that there was no necessity for a law of this sort. He should vote for the amendment. Mr. DIGBY SEYMOUR grounded his objection to the clauses in the bill on the opinion expressed by Sir James Stirling before the committee of 1848, that they legalised a breach of contract on the part of the seaman, and laid the foundation for quarrels between the master and seamen for all the time they might happen to be together. Sir G. PECHELL did not think the bill gave the power which hon. gentleman seemed to apprehend, whilst it cer tainly remedied many of the evils of which complaint had been made. Captain SCOBELL asked what men-of-war were main tained for on foreign stations if not to protect the com merce of the country ? And how could they do that if they were not fully manned ? If they chanced to lose 30 or 40 men through sickness, some means must be resorted to for the purpose of making up the complement. The higher consideration, therefore, was that the man-of-war should be kept in a state of perfect efficiency. And if this were necessary in time of peace, it was doubly so in time of war. The shipowner should remember, too, that a vast concession had been made to him which he (Captain Scobell) had striven hard to prevent, namely - that he might enlist foreigners in his crew. (Hear, hear.) As to the opinion of Sir James Sti r li ng , quoted by the hon. member for Sunderland (Mr. D. Seymour), all he could say was that that gallant gentleman differed in his evi dence from every other person who was examined. Sir James Stirling was of opinion that men-of-war could be manned without the assistance of the merchant service. But that was sheer nonsense. It was altogether out of the question. It could not be done in a period of peace. And in war nothing could supply the navy with men but the mercantile marine. Mr. HEADLAM supported the amendment on the ground that the provision it contained was not only in strict right and justice due to the merchant service, but also expedient for the navy itself. At the same time he admitted that the bill conferred material benefits on the former. The question was, however, whether it was worth while, for the sake of such a small advantage to the navy, to maintain a privilege which was not based on any sound or rational principle, and which in fact had become obsolete. He was satisfied that it was not, and that it was actually for the interest of the navy that it should rely on the voluntary spirit and efforts of the people. Sir J. GRAHAM would be extremely sorry if the house, in an unhappy hour, were induced to depart from this valuable privilege. (Hear, hear.) The hon. m em b er sa id it was obsel e t e . N ow if he meant by that that it was ob solete, and had fallen into disuetude from not being used :when positively necessary he was quite mistaken. It had under been recognised by statute from the reign of George 11., the present time, and been in constant use. And all the abus es of this night had been progressively modified, an d he might :ere now finally rectified by the bill with regard dis ens co sion sa w y hich provided a remedy for all the prin cipal evils house was to o' sure b readiy m o plained of. His hon. friend based the mea t: 91.3 ground of right and of policy. And observ e b r usei of the privilege, all he asked the regulations of ytehaersll'ocac vided against il ilei T .o the checks and guards that were pro rild.roefneldmiralty, which had been of every ship in her ;la°,fer Ho held in his hand the d under which the commander framed a few . was bound to make a the circumstances miner which which included all quarterlyy-'service, at a foreign station, retu rn , vessel might have joined his crew, The men from a merchant Liverpool (Mr. Horsfall) was mistaken hon. member for commander of one of her Majesty' s 11 su pP nai ng that a from a merchant vessel just as he might ship s ruld take men was, that he could not only not so take please. The fact had no right to receive them without statinv.,to t t e that he A raltv whether the captain had consented to the m en ~,ln ie , i ; teering, and if he had not consented, what was ° the strength of the crew after the volunteering h a d taken place, and what was the reason why ho bad accepted the men against the wish of the captain. All those returns were made quarterly from every ship in her Majesty's service ; they wer e investigated by the Board of Ad miralty, and if any complaint were made by a capt a i n of Admiralty in the merchant service, the Board the was ready to institute a further f inquiry into_ case. The number of these volunteers was mucbsmaller than some gentlemen seemed to imagine. Ina pe riod of eighteen months, 170 men only had volunteered . on into the service foreign station from the merchant service . _ of her Majesty ; and of those 170 persons 61 had assigned the general ill-treatment they had received on board the merchant ships as the reason for their having made the change. It was obvious that that right afforded the sea men in merchant vessels a security against ill-treatment ; and he submitted, therefore, that on the ground of huma nity, as well as on the ground of policy, the clause which had been proposed by his hon. friend the member for Gateshead ought not to be adopted. Mr. THOMPSON supported the clause proposed by the hon. member for Gateshead. He believed that the right for which the right hon. baronet the First Lord of the Admiralty contended, was of little value to her Majesty's service, as the right hon. baronet himself had shown, while it was productive of great annoyance in the mercantile marine. had been wrecked upon the north-east coast of Ireland, re ' presenting property to the amount of 167,0001. Mr. R. M. FOX hoped the amendment would meet with a favourable consideration. He must protest against a different allocation of the 90,0001. in the hands of the Ballast Board, and the 32,0001. remaining with the Trinity House, or against any set-off being taken on account of the debt due from Kingstown Harbour. Mr. V. SCULLY considered that the bill contemrlated a very bad bargain for Ireland. The only argument that he had heard in favour of the proposition was, that Ireland having this large balance unappropriated she ought to be deprived of it. Mr. CARDWELL said whatever gain would arise from the transaction, Ireland would have its fair share. It so happened that Ireland had a balance of 100,0001., but that sum was subjected to a debt of 170,0001. (A laugh.) Out of that balance of 100,0001. there was a sum of 20,0001. to be expended on Irish works, under this act. He had explained the whole of the arrangement on two previous occasions in committee, and he believed all parties were satisfied. Mr. HUME understood that the way in which Ireland became possessed of that large balance was by charging lid. instead of ld. per ton. It was money unjustly levied upon the commerce of the country, as no money ought to be levied beyond what was required to keep the lights and harbours in a proper condition. Mr. VANCE complained that foreign vessels which did use the harbour of Kingstown were compelled to pay dues, while vessels which did use the harbour were exempted. He thought that was a great hardship, and ought to be remedied. Colonel DUNNE could not see how this debt of 170,0001. could be made out. The amendment was then negatived without a division. Mr. INGHAM then moved the amendment of which he had given notice in the 29th clause :—" Excepting as to ships employed in a coasting voyage from one part of the United Kingdom to another ; or in a voyage between the United Kingdom and the islands of Guernsey, Jersey, Al derney, Sark, or Man, or from one part of either of them to anothe? of the same; or employed in fishing on the coasts of the United Kingdom or of any of the said islands; in which cases, and every of them, the whole of the crew shall be British seamen." He contended that they were bound at least to protect this department of their trade, which was the great nursery of their seamen, and which might be said to be the hereditary employment of thousands of the people of this country. He objected to allowing foreign sailors to enter this trade, and hoped he would have the support of the house in the amendment he now pro posed. Captain SCOBELL seconded the amendment. Mr. CARDWELL objected to the amendment. He thought that when they were throwing open the foreign trade there could be no good ground for making an excep tion in favour of the coasting trade. The house then divided— For the amendment Against it countries. However, he was persuaded, after w h a t h ad passed, that it would be impossible to pass it this session. The motion of Mr. Kinnaird was then unanimous sly agreed to. DUTIES ON HORSES LET FOR HIRE BILL. This bill was read a third time and passed, BETTING-HOUSES BILL. This bill was committed pro forma. CUSTOMS ACTS CONSOLIDATION YELL. This bill was read a second time. INSURANCES ON LIVES BILL. This bill was read a second time. The house then adjourned at three o'clock. Mr. MANGLES also supported the clause which had been moved by the hon. member for Gateshead. He had himself seen the right of taking seamen from a merchant vessel exercised in a most offensive and mischievous manner in the port of Madras. The crew of the vessel had held out some signal of discontent, and the lieutenant of one of her Majesty's ships had immediately gone on board, had compelled the captain to muster his crew, and had then taken off a number of his best men, so that he had after wards been greatly crippled in the discharge of his duties. Mr. WILCOX said, that men who were disposed to leave a merchant vessel never had any hesitation in avowing that it was in consequence of ill-treatment they were induced to take that step. Discontented men on board such a ves sel hoisted the well-known signal of a red shirt, and then there came to them a boat from one of her Majesty's ships. He knew a case in which the system in question had operated in the most grievous way. Off the Mauritius the red shirt was hoisted on board a vessel bound from Calcutta to England, and 12 of the best hands had then been taken off to one of her Majesty's ships. There had not bean a suffi cient number of hands left to manage the vessel, and next day she had become perfectly logged in a dead calm. A steamer had approached, and when the captain had been asked for 12 men, he said he would do something better than give them—he would tow the vessel on. He had ac cordingly towed her to the Cape, and when arrived there he had claimed 2,2001. for salvage. The result was, that up wards of 5,000/. worth of the cargo had been sold to meet that claim, and the vessel had been detained six months. Admiral BERKELEY said he believed that the existing arrangement operated as a valuable security against the ill-treatment of men in the merchant service. He had known a case in which Admiral Parker, when stationed at the Tagus, had endeavoured to terminate a quarrel between the master and the men on board a merchant vessel. That vessel had sailed away, but the next day when a ship of war had been seen by the crew, theyhad jumped overboard their own vessel to her. It was manifest that nothing but the grossest ill-treatment could have driven them t o take so extreme a course. Mr. R. PALMER said that the house had been only a choice of difficulties. But he thought that, balancing the advantages and disadvantages on each side, the best course they could pursue would be to adopt the proposal of her Majesty's Government, and to try that relaxation of a pre vious practice before they determined on abolishing a right which it might be most important that the officers of her Majesty's navy should possess on great public emergencies. Mr. HUTT introduced some verbal amendments into the clause he had moved. The house then divided— For Mr. Hutt's clause Against it Majority against the clause --80 Captain SCOBELL then moved the following clause PARLIAMENTARY DIVISIONS. HOUSE OF COMMONS.-AuG. 1. ( Front the Votes and Proceedings of the House of Commons.) MERCHANT SHIPPING BILL. Another clause (whereas it is expedient that seamen should no longer be permitted to desert the vessels in which they are engaged for the purpose of entering into her Majesty's service, be it enacted, that the fiftieth and fifty-first sections of the act of the eighth year of her present Majesty, chapter one hundred and twelve, shall be repealed ; and it shall not be lawful for any officer in her Majesty's service knowingly to permit or encourage any seaman to leave the vessel in which he is engaged ; and every seaman leaving his ship and entering into her Majesty's service shall be liable to all the penalties of desertion, any law or custom notwithstanding) brought up, and read the first time :—Motion made, and question put, "That the said clause be now read a second time." The house divided—ayes, 49; noes, 129. MINORETY—AYES 49. Beaumont, W. B. Heywood, James Pollard-Urquhart, W. Bell, J. Heyworth, Lawrence Russell. F. W. Blackett, J. F. 'Torsion, Thomas B. Seymour, H. In, Bright, John Hume, J. Seymour, W. D. Cheetham, John Ingham, R. Shelley, Sir J. V. Clay, Sir W. Kirk, Milian/ Smith, John Abel Duncan, G. Laing, Samuel Stuart, Lord Dudley Dunlop, A. Langton, H. G. Thompson, George Elliot, J. E. Liddell, H. G. Wahnsley, Sir J. Fagan, William Liddell, T. Warner, Edward Ferguson, Joseph Macgregor, John Wilkinson, W. A. Forster, J. Maguire, John F. Wilcox, B. Fox, William J. Mitchell, T. Willoughby, Sir H. Gooderich, Vis. Moffatt, G. Greene, J. Morris, D. Gregson, Samuel Murrough, J. P. Ha,stie, Alexander Pechell, Sir G, B. Mangles, R, Headlam, Thomas E. Pellatt, Apsley Hutt, William MAJORITY—NOES, ITS. A'Court, C. George, John pakner, Roundell Adderley, C. Gladstone, William Palmerston, Viscount Archdall, Captain Gower, F. L. Patten, J. Bailey, , ir J. Graham, Sir J. feel, P. Baines, M. T. Greene, T. reel, Colonel Ball, John. Grenfell, C. Percy, J. William Barrington, Viscount Hamilton, Geo. A. Pete, 8.• Bass, Michael Thos. Hastie, Archibald flaimore, R. J. Berkeley, Admiral Henley, Joseph: W. Pilking - tc , n, James Berkeley Grenville Herbert, Sidney Robertson, P. F. Bethell, Sir Richard Herbert, Sir Thomas Russell, JA)rd J. Blair, Colonel Hervey, Lord Alfred Saclleir, X. Benham-Carter, John Howard, Lord E. Sawle, C. B. G. Booth, Sir R. Hume, W. Fitzwilliam Scobell, Ca itt. Bouverie, E. Inglis, Sir R. H. Scully, F. Bower, G. Johnstone, James Scully, V. Boyle, Hon. Colonel Jolllffe, Sir W. G.H. Seymour, Loi 'd Brocklehurst, John Jones, David Smith, Rt. Ho. R. Brotherton, Joseph Keating, R. Spooner, Riche& Bruce, Lord Ernest Kendall, N. Struts, Rt. Bon, ,E Buller, Sir J. Keogh, William Sutton, J. H. M.. Sunbury, W. Kershaw, James Tancred, Henry W tn. Butler, Charles S. Kinnaird, Arthur F. Thornely, Thomas.: Cabbell, B. B. Lawley, F. C. Townshend, Capt. Cairns, H. M`Calmont Lee, William Tyler, Sir G. Cardwell, Edward Lockhart, A. E. Vance, J. Caulfield, Colonel Lockhart, W. Vernon, C. Chambers, T. Loveden, P. Villiers, Francis Cockburn, Sir Al Lowe, Robert Vyse, Capt. Cowper, W. Macartney, G. Waddington, David Craufurd, E. H. 3 Mackinnon, W. A. Waddington, H. Cubitt, Mr. Ald. Macgregor, James Walcott, Adm. Davies, D. Matins, R. Whitmore, Henry Denison, J. E. Massey, W. N. Wickham, Henry W. Drumlanrig, Viscount Masterman, John Williams.,M. Drummond, Henry Mottle, Colonel Wilson, J. Dunne, Colonel Michell, William Wodehouse, E. Elcho, Lord Molesworth, Sir W. Wood, Sir Charles Esmonde, J. Monk, Viscount Wrightson, W. Fitzgerald, J. D. Monsen, W. Wyndham, William Fitzgerald, W. It. S. Mostyn, E. M. Young, Sir John Freestun, Colonel Mowbray, John R. TELLERS Frewen, C. H. O'Brien, Patrick Hayter, W. G. Gardner, Richard O'Connell, D. Mulgrave, Earl Another clause (whereas many vessels are sent to sea in efficiently manned, to the danger of life and sacrifice of property, and much incertitude has arisen respecting the proper number of hands to be carried for the due navigation of vessels ; and whereas, since tho repeal of the thirty-seventh clause of the Merchant Seamen's Act, a large number of ships have been sent to sea without a boy or apprentice on board, bo it enacted, that from and after the passing of this act, it shall not be lawful for any Custom House officer, or other person to grant clearance to any agent, owner, master, or broker, for the sailing of a British vessel out of any port in the United Kingdom or Channel Isles, with a cargo, or in ballast to a foreign port, either in the foreign home trading, or coasting trades, unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the offi cers of her Majesty's Customs, by the articles signed by the officers and seamen, that such vessel is manned after the following rate :—Vessels of the burthen of one hun dred tons register, computed by new measurement, one duly indentured apprentice, above the age of twelve years and under twenty-one years of age, such apprentice to be bound for not less than three years, and one boy to every 1 additional one hundred tons, with one master, officer, seaman, or proper person, to every twenty-five tons complete, or four seamen to every one hundred tons : Pro vided always, that an apprentice who has served for a full terms of three years on ship-board, and who is above seventeen years of age, may count for one seaman when the number of apprentices and boys does not exceed one to every one hundred tons ; and owners wishing to carry men iu largo vessels instead of boys, may compute their crews on the ensuing scale ; that is to say, in vessels above two hundred tons, nine seamen for every two hundred tons above the first one hundred tons,—namely, on board a ship of three hundred tons, for example, thirteen seamen and one apprentice, masters and officers included.) Motion made and question put, "That the said clause be now read a second time." The house divided : ayes 7, noes 154. TILLERS. . 35 . 104 -69 Majority.... The bill then passed. Lord J. RUSSELL said that to-morrow (this day) he proposed to proceed with the committee of supply. On Thursday he would state the intentions of the Government with regard to Jamaica. Mr. BROTHERTON (at half-past one o'clock) objected to proceeding any further. (Hear, hear, and laughter.) PILOTAGE BILL. The house then went into committee on this bill. On clause 10, Mr. HORSFALL resisted the attempt at that hour to proceed further with a bill of so much importance. Mr. LIDDELL moved that the chairman report pro gress. .. 49 .129 "Whereas many vessels are sent to sea inefficiently manned, to the danger of life and sacrifice of property, and muck incertitude has arisen respecting the proper number of hands to be carried for the due navigation of vessels ; and whereas, since the repeal of the 37th clause of the Mer chant Seamen's Act, a large number of ships have been sent to sea without a boy or apprentice on board, be it en acted that, from and after the passing of this act, it shall not be lawful for any Custom-house officer, or other per son, to grant clearance to any agent, owner, master, or broker, for the sailing of a British vessel out of any port in the United Kingdom or Channel Isles, with a cargo, or in ballast to a foreign port, either in the foreign, home trading, or coasting trades, unless it be shown to the sa tisfaction of the officers of her Majesty's Customs, by the articles signed by the officers and seamen, that such vessel is manned after the following rate : vessels of the burden of 100 tons register, computed by new measurement, one duly indentured apprentice, above the ago of 12 years, and under 21 years of age, such apprentice to be bound for not less than three years ; and one boy to every additional 100 tons, with one master, officer, seaman, or proper person, to every 25 tons complete, or four seamen to every 100 tons : Provided always, that an apprentice who has served for a full term of three years on shipboard, and who is above 17 years of age, may count for one seaman when the number of apprentices and boys does not exceed one to every 100 tons ; and owners wishing to carry men in large vessels instead of boys may compute their crews after the ensuing scale—that is to say, in vessels above 200 tons, nine seamen for every 200 tons above the first 100 tons—namely, on board a ship of 300 tons, for example, 13 seamen and one apprentice (master and officers in cluded)." He contended that ships worked by foreigners could not be worked as efficiently as if the crew were na tives. The naval committee that had sat recently had strongly recommended the system of apprentices. By his clause the number of apprentices would be increased to 20,000, instead of 14,000. Two-thirds of the emigrant vessels did not carry any apprentices at all. Now he thought, to keep up a good stock of seamen, they should keep up the system of apprentices. He confessed that his great object in proposing the clause was to secure the safety of the country in case of war. They must recollect that our seamen could take out American protection, and thereby be lost to our service. For reporting progress 27 Against it 97 Majority Mr. E. BALL immediately moved that the chairman leave the chair. (Cheers.) Mr. CARDWELL appealed to the lateness of the session as a reason why he felt compelled to press the bill on. The motion for Mr. Bouverie leaving the chair was agreed to, and the house resumed. CRIME AND OUTRAGE (IRELAND) BILL. On the motion for the third reading of this bill, Mr. MAGUIRE resisted the measure as unnecessary in the present circumstances of Ireland. He thought that at least the proclamations should be withdrawn from those counties which were comparatively peaceable. Sir J. YOUNG, whilst he admitted that the millions of Ireland were in a peaceable and contented state, could not shut his eyes to the existence of certain secret societies in that country, to which it was still necessary to extend the law. After a few words from Mr. BOWYER, The bill was read a third time and passed. BURIALS (BEYOND THE METROPOLIS) BILL. This bill was read a third time and passed, and the foll [owing clause added :—" Provided always, that in all cases in which any burial board shall provide a new burial ground, that new burial ground shall be divided into consecrated and unconsecrated parts in such proportions, and the unconsecrated part thereof shall be allotted in such manner and in such portions as may be sanctioned by one of her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State ; and when any burial board shall, by virtue of section 30 of the said act, build on any burial-ground provided by such board a chapel for the performance of the burial service according to the rites of the United Church of England and Ireland, they shall also build on the portion of such ground set apart for burials otherwise than according to the rites of the said Church, such chapel accommodation for the per formance of burial service by persons not being members of the said Church, as may be approved of by one of her Majesty's Secretaries of State." THE LUNACY REGULATION BILL. This bill was read a third time. HACKNEY-CARRIAGE DUTIES BILL. This bill was brought up to be considered as amended. Mr. LOWE brought up a clause, which, he said, he be lieved to have been framed at the request of the cab pro prietors themselves, and which would undoubtedly benefit the public. The object of the clause was, that where a cab was hired by time, after the first hour the cabman could demand for every quarter of an hour 6d., instead of 2s. for the' whole hour. The clause was agreed to and added to the bill. Mr. F. SCULLY brought up a clause which was in tended to prevent the cab proprietors again suddenly with drawing their cabs from the streets, by giving power to the commissioners of police to withdraw or suspend the licenses for cabs in the event of their being withdrawn two consecutive days, without a notice of 10 days having been given by the proprietors, or to the magistrates to inflict a fine not exceeding 20s. for each carriage withdrawn each clay. (Hear, hear.) Mr. LOWE begged to state that the cl a use m e t w ith th e approval of the Scretary to the Treasury. Lord D. STUART objected to the clause, because it left everything to the decision of a magistrate. He should, on the third reading of the bill, move a clause, giving the power of appeal from the decision of the magistrate or police commissioner in every case falling under the act. It had been his intention on a previous occasion to give notice of the clause which he proposed to move, but at that time the proprietors of cabs had withdrawn them from the streets, and under those circumstances he felt that it would not have been in accordance with his duty to give any notice on the subject. Mr. R. PALMER considered the clause to be a speci men of inconsiderate legislation, and he should feel it his duty to oppose it. Mr. I. BUTT thought that the hon. member for Tippe rary was out of order in proposing a clause at the present st age o f the bill of which he had given notice for the third reading. Ho should wish to hear the Speaker's opinion on that point. The SPEAKER was of opinion that, as the hon. mem ber had given notice of his intention to move the clause on the third reading, it was not competent for him to move it at the present stage of the measure. The clause was then withdrawn. Mr. FREWEN objected to the radius of four miles from Charing-cross. The house ought to know that this was called a west-end clause and a House of Commons clause. If the clause stood as at present, it would include Wands worth-common and the end of Streatham, where there was very little chance of a back fare, and would exclude the populous districts about Mile-end. He proposed, as an amendment, that the outside boundaries of the metro politan boroughs should be adopted as the limit beyond which the increased charge should:commence. Sir W. CLAY had received many representations from the inhabitants of the east-end of the metropolis protest ing against Charing-cross being selected as the centre of the four mile circle. The four miles would just go be yond Whitechapel, and would exclude the hundreds of thousands who lived at Mile-end, Limehouse, and parts adjacent, while it would include Chelsea, Lambeth, and the country districts beyond them. (Hear.) He would propose St. Paul's, which was adopted as the central point of the metropolis in some recent acts of Parliament. Mr. LOWE had been requested by his hon. friend (Mr. Fitzroy) to propose Temple-bar as the best point from which to measure the four mile circle. (Hear.) The Gen eral Post-office had been thought of, but that would omit Chelsea, while the amendment of the hon. member (Mr. Frewen) would extend to some country districts. He understood, for example, that the borough of Marylebone went up nearly to Hampstead. After a short conversation, in which Mr. BROTHERTON renewed his protest against proceeding with the discussion at so late an hour (half-past 2), The house divided. The numbers were— For the amendment l4 Against it Majority —74 Mr. LO WE then moved the substitution of the words " Temple-bar" for " Charing-cross" as the centre of the circle from which to calculate the four miles. Mr. FREWEN said, that whatever point the circle were taken from, it would be unfair to certain districts. The further end Eaton-square, and probably part of Hackney, would be beyond the circle now proposed. ("No, no.") The motion for the substitution of Temple-bar was then agreed to. Adniiral WALCOTT supported the clause, and said he was persuaded that the disastrous shipwrecks which had taken place, and the great loss which resulted, were mainly owing to the inefficient manning of our ships. It was proposed to rob the sailor for the benefit of the foreigner, and the sailor would therefore look for a permanent home in America. Thousands of British sailors were now in the service of that power, and numbers were daily going over, but none were coming from that country. Mr CARDWELL said the clause under discussion was not the manning clause, but one prescribing the number of men to man his ship to the shipowner. Parliament had repealed the law directing the shipowner as to the number of men in his ship, and 9,000 men had been added in three years to the mercantile marine. The plan, therefore, ' worked well. Would a law of an opposite character work well as regarded apprentices ? He was satisfied it would not. It was not consistent with reason to dictate to the shipowner in the matter of men, nor would it be so in the case of apprentices. The fact was, the owner would evade the clause by taking landsmen. He (Mr. C.) did not think the clause was at allin conformity with the spirit of legisla tion of that house, nor calculated to promote the interests of the shipowners, and he was therefore inclined to regard it rather as a protest than as a serious proposal. Mr. DUNCAN said that all the mercantile marine wanted of Parliament was to be let alone. And he en treated of the Government, therefore, to agree to no re striction on it. MINORITY-AYES, 7. Rooth, Sir R. Macartney, G. TELLYZA. Hamilton, Lord C. Taylor, Colonel Walcot, Adm. Herbert, Sir Thomas Tyler, Sir George Scobell, Captain Kendall, Nicholas MAJORITY-NOES 151. A'Court, C. 11. W. Adderley, C. Goodman, Sir G. Goold, W. Mowbray, J. O'Brien, P. Mr. HUME objected to the clause. The commercial navy would support itself. The house then divided— For the clause Against it 154 -147 Majority The clause was therefore rejected. Mr. HORSFALL (in the absence of Mr. Collier), moved the following clause --" That where any seaman or ap prentice, who shall have committed any offence punishable under the Mercantile Marine Act, 1850, by summary pro ceeding before a justice of the peace, shall arrive or be found on shipboard within two miles of any borough in which there is a justice of the peace capable of exercising summary jurisdiction under the said act, such offence shall for the purpose of giving jurisdiction to such justice under the said act, be deemed to have been committed within the limits of such borough." Mr. R. PALMER said it would be more convenient to postpone the question, and he had no doubt his hon. and learned friend would not object to do so if the government thought it requisite. The clause was therefore negatived without a division. Mr. CAIRNS moved the amendment to the 4th clause on the subject of the services of the light-houses. He was not inclined altogether to dispute the arrangement proposed by the bill, which placed the balance of 100,0001. now in the hands of the Ballast Board of Dublin at the disposal of the amalgamated fund, for he regarded the existence of so large a balance as a proof that that board had not doze its duty very energetically. He should like to know, however, why a sillier course was not to be adopted as regarded the fund at the disposal of the Trinity House. Now according to the clause under consideration, it was proposed to make the fund only applicable for the purposes of building light houses, and providing andkeeping in repair what were called marks of the sea, so that the commissioners would be de barred from taking any steps to remove rocks or other impediments to navigation, and to show how the act would work, he might state that he knew of a buoy on the north east coast of Ireland which was maintained at an annual cost of 1001. Now, according to different estimates, the rock which it was intended to point out might be blown up at an expense of from 2001. to 1,000/. ; but under the bill as it stood there would be no power to obviate such an anomalous state of things as that, which actually saw them incurring, at the very least, double the expendi ture necessary, independently of other advantages. The fact was, the law as it stood was so framed at a time when it was not contemplated that sub-marine operations would be carried on to the extent which was witnessed now-a-days. He therefore proposed to amend clause 4, so that from line 31 it should stand as follows :—" And such aggregate fund should be applicable to the purposes of the services in respect of which the said tolls, rates, fees, and payments are levied, and to the execution of works neces sary or expedient for permanently, reducing the expense of such services, and save, as hereinafter specially mentioned, to no other purposes whatever." Mr. CARDWELL said, that the question raised by the hon. and learned gentleman, whose conspicuous abilities rendered him so worthy a representative of a great com mercial port—(hear, hear)—was one peculiarly belonging to the shipping interests to be decided. For undoubtedly, by the law as it now stood it was impossible that the Board of Trade could use the funds in the manner pro posed by the hon. member • he would therefo re l eave th e amendment entirely in the hands of the house. With regard, however, to a point raised by the hon. gentleman, he might state that the sums invested under statute • and therefore they could be affected again by statute. But as respected the fund belonging to the Trinity House, that was money to which British shipowners had never contri buted, it having been levied from off foreign shipping ; and the important part of its enactments had been made more than five-and-twenty years ago, in strict conformity with their charter. 'When, therefore, upon the requisition of the government, the board surrendered its right of tax ation in all cases, except for the purposes of this bill, it had never entered into any engagement at all—nor would the government have thought it reasonable to ask them to do so—to surrender any of the sums which had been levied off foreign shipping. After some observations from Mr. HUME expressive of his great desire that the day would soon come when the whole question of the Trinity House would come under review, the clause as amended was agreed to. Mr. KIRK then proposed the following amendment : In clause 5, line 12, page 4, after " and the produce thereof," insert "shall, in the first instance, be applied for the purpose of finishing any works already commenced the eyresidueharbourthose o bodies fofs respectively,urechfui refuge uo inesthea f o et r aes f rt o e r sr thenu ccoast purpose aaspt polif application te o i lo f ann f forming ni f oa i rn n ed g . amendmentsafore said."d ." The bours of refugeaonmtoPhsrteoevl7. was s u t se o would perceive that the object of th be established on the coast des tee t ofuoopfarpllotrhsheiela harbour establishmentlreland. For a very y o s n h aarlle imnidgehetd,run in and remain with the most perfect r of Liverpool, refuge wheremight and to show the necessity for such he would sv o a fe u se t s l te a yl y s, men tion that within the last aye Years no less than 447 vessels - Sir J. SHELLEY suggested that the case of the Hansom cabmen was deserving of some consideration at the hands of the Government. Mr. FREWEN gave notice that upon the third reading ho should move to give the cabmen additional pay after 12 o'clock at night. The hon. gentleman moved that no charge should be made for the conveyance of a man -servant upon the box when the cab was engaged by two persons. Mr. LOWE opposed the motion. The motion was withdrawn. DUBLIN CARRIAGE BILL. This bill, as amended, was considered, and several fresh amendments introduced. SMOKE NUISANCE ABATEMENT (METROPOLIS) BILL. This bill was read a second time. ECCLESIASTICAL LEASING ACT AMENDMENT ____-.-. BILL. This bill was also road a second time. SOUTH SEA ANNUITIES DISSENTIENTS. The resolutions of the committee on this subject were received. MISSIONARY BISHOPS BILL. Mr. A. KINNAIRD moved that this bill be read a se cond time that day three months. It was a measure which had been hurried through the House of Lords, and which a great number of persons interested in its provisions had had no opportunity of considering. He thought it a very improper thing to introduce so important a measure at this late period of the session, and he hoped the noble lord at the head of the Government in that house would not at tempt to pass it. Mr. SPOONER said that the bill was of that nature that it would be quite impossible to carry it. Lord SEYMOUR wished to know whether the Govern ment supported or opposed the bill ? Mr. PHILLIMORE had not charge of the bill, but he wished to correct a great misconception which prevailed in respect to it It was slpposed that the object of the bill was to introduce bishops of the English Church into other Christian nations. This was an entire mistake; there was no such provision in the bill. The object of the bill was simply to allow bishops to act as naiesionaries in heathen Syr THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, AUGUST 2, 18f3. Archdall;Captain M. Gower, F. L. 0 Connell, D. Bailey, Sir J. Graham, Sir James' Osborne, Ralph Baines, M T. Greene, John Palmer, R. Ball, Edward Ball, John Greene, T. Gregson, Samuel Palmerston, Via, Patten, W. Barrington, Viscount Grenfell,C. Bass, M. T. Hastie, Alexander Bell, James Hastie, Archibald Berkeley, Admiral Headlam, T. E. Pechell, Sir G. Peel Frederick Pellatt Apsley Percy, J. Berkeley, Grenville Henley, J. W. Pete., B. Bethell, Richard Herbert, Sidney Phillipps, J. H. Blair, Colonel Hervey, Lord A. l'hillimore, R. Bonham-Carter, J. Heyworth, L. - -'7 PilkMgton, James Bouverie, E. P. Horsfall, T. B. Russell, Lord John Bowyer, George Howard, Lord E. Russell, FAIW . Boyle, Col. Hume, Joseph Bowie:C. B. G. Brocklehurst, J. Hume, W. F. Scully, F. Br otherton, Joseph Ilutt, William Scully, V. Bruce, Lord E. Ingham, Robert Seymour, Lord Buller, Sir J. Y. Johnstone, James Seymer, H. D. Butler, Charles S. Jolliffe ' Sir W. G. H. S e y mou r, W. D. Cairn, 11. M'C almont Jones, D. Shelley, Sir J. V. Cardwell, Hon. E. Keating, Robert Spooner, R. Chambers, Thomas Keogh, William Strutt, E. Cheetham, John Kershaw,:James Stuart, Lord D. Clay, Sir W. Kinnaird, A. F. Tancred, H. W. Cobbold, J. C. Kirk, William Thompson, G. Cockburn, Sir A. Laing, S. Thornely, T. Cowper, William Langton, H. G. Thornhill, W. Craufurd, E. Lawley, F. C. Townsend, Capt. Crossley, Frank Lee, W, Vernon,(). E. 11. Davies, D. Liddell, 11. G. Villiers, Rt. Hn, C. Dering, Sir E. Liddell, T. Waddington, D. Drumlanrig, Vis. Lockhart, A. E. Walmsley, Sir J. Duncan, George Lockhart, W. Walter, John Dunlop, A. Loveden, P. Warner, E. Elcho, Lord Lowe, Robert Whitmore, H. Elliot, John Mackinnon, W. Wickham. H. W Esmonde, John Macgregor. James Wilkinson, W. Fagan, W. Malin, Richard Wilcox, B. Ferguson, Sir Robert Massey, W. N. Willoughby, H. B Ferguson, Joseph Maule, Colonel Wilson, James Fitzgerald, J. Milligan, R. Wood, Sir C. Fitzgerald, W. Michell, W. Wortley, Jas. Stuart Forster, C. Mitchell, T. A. Wyndham, W. Forster, John Moffatt, G. Young, Sir John Freestun, Colonel Molesworth, Sir W. Frewen, C. H. Monck, Lord Gardner, Richard Monsell, William Gladstone, William Morris, D. Goderich, Viscount Mostyn, E. M. TELLERS. Hayter, Hon. W. Mulgrave, Earl RAILWAY SHARE MARKETS. LIVERPOOL, AUG. 1. STOCK EXCHANGE.—The market was extremely dull all day, and closed without the slightest animation. Quota tions were fully i per cent. below the prices current on Saturday. Chester and Birkenhead, 20i ; Blackburn, 61 ; Chester and Holyhead, 22/ ; Lancashire And Yorkshire, 778 ; London and North Western, 116 /c ; Midland, 711; North British, 8 5-16 ; S ou th E as t ern an d D over, 21A ; York, Newcastle, an d B erw i c k , 17i ; L ancas t er an d Yor - shire 161. F shares, 8 dis. BIRMINGHAM:, AuG. 1. STOCK EXCHANGE. - Birmingham, Wolverhampton, and Stour Valleys, 101. Bs. 9d. ; Midland stock, 72.} ; South Staffordshires, s dis. These were the transactions done, and the following were some of the closing prices— London and North Western Eighths, ss. to 6s. 3d. prem.; South Staffords, Ito dis. There were buyers of Shrews bury stock at the improved price of 60. LEEDS, Aun. 1. STOCK EXCHANGE.—The dealings of this morning being for the new account, thero was very little doing. There is, in fact, an almost entire absence of speculation in rail way shares, and, pending the settlement of the Turkish question, no change of importance is looked to. Midlands have been done at 72, a slight decline upon Saturday's quotations. In other shares there is no change. medicine, inconvenience, or Barry's Food, without [ADVERTISEMENT.]—Fifty Thousand Cures by D u constipation, "Twenty-five yea debility, from which I had suffered great ex pense (as it saves ti in i us t n s e e s o s s , t in other remedi es ) .— indiges tion, and misdry, and which no cured medic by D medicine could B raemrroyv,se Borerveallieenvtea, have been effectually a ver y „_ sh . o „ rt Ei t g im ht e. ye W ars . , R. sßpeeepvseilst, Aporaobl iAnthony, Tiverton. nervousness, debility, with cramps, s p asms, and nausea, for which my servant had consulted the advice of many, have been effectually removed by Du Barry's delicious health-restoring food in a very short time. I shall be happy to answer Rector any inquiries. Rev. J o h n W . Flavell, Ridlington y, Norfolk."—" Three years excessive nervousness, with pains in my neck and left arm, and general debility, which rendered my life very miserable, has been radically removed by Du Barry's health-re storing food. Alexs. Stuart, Archdeacon of Ross, Skib bereen."—" 50 years' indescribable agony from dys pepsia, nervousness, asthma, cough, constipation, flatu lency, spasms, sickness at the stomach, and vomitings, has been removed by Du Barry's excellent food. Maria Jolly, Wortham Ling, near Diss, Norfolk."—Copies of testimonials of 50,000 cures (including those of Lord Stuart do Decies, Major-General Thomas King, Drs. Ure, Shorland, and Harvey) gratis. In canisters, with full instructions, lib., 2s. 9d. ; 21b., 4s. 6d. ; 51b, 11s. ; 121 b., 225. ; super-refined, 51b., 225. ; 101 b. 33e. The 101b. and 121 b. carriage free. Barry Du Bar ry 77, Regent-st reet , L ondon. and Co., SPORTING INTELLIGENCE: TATTERSALL'S—MoNDAv. Room, terrace, and yard were crowded throughout the afternoon, but beyond the settling on the Goodwood events very little business was transacted. Most of the balance sheets presented an extraordinary array of figures, the betting having been to an extent seldom, if ever surpassed. That it had been a smiling meeting for the fielders was very evident, but " the true joy is when the money comes ;" and what with the late attendance of some par ties, the total absence of the accounts of others—heavy betters, too—and the disappointment caused by three or four "hit and missing," one of whom used to be deep in commissions, and whose locus stancli in future is likely to be in that paradise of defaulters, Boulogne, there was a fruitful source of vexation and complaint. As to the parties who have means at command, but wh postpone the day of payment as long as they can, they need scarcely be told that they place themselves in a pot ition which is calculated to have a damaging effect on their credit. The few bets which came under our notice were in accordance with the odds stated below : BRIGHTON STAKES. Vto 2 agst Adine (3 to 1 taken freely' 3to 1 agst Lord Clifden's Poodle. 3to 1 agst Pantomime (taken). 4to 1 agst Jouvence. ST. LEGER. sto 4on West Australian (offered to money). sto 1 agst Sittingbourne (taken). Bto 1 agst Cineas (taken). DERBY. 25 to I agst Boiardo (taken). 25 to 1 agst Ortolano (taken). 25 to 1 agst King Tom (taken to 1001.) 25 to 1 agst Wild Huntsman (taken.) 25 to 1 agst Paxton (taken). 30 to 1 agst First Lord (taken). 1,000 to 30 agst Alembic (taken). 50 to 1 agst Knight of St. George (taken to 3001.) On the previous afternoon 7,000 to 200 was taken about Muscovado. BRIGHTON NURSERY STAKES.—Kennysidej Hero and Beauty are scratched. FLYING STAKES, WORCESTER.—We understand that the Stewards of the Jockey Club have decided that Le Juif is entitled to the stakes. We have not, however, received an official announcement of the fact. BETTING -HOUSES BlLL.—Yesterday afternoon a depu tation of betting -office keepers, among whom were Messrs. G. Read, Maclure, Mather, and Baines, waited upon Lord Palmerston, and were received with great courtesy. Their object was to direct his Lordship's attention to the most stringent clauses of the bill which is in progress for the suppression of betting-houses. That some revision is required is unquestionable, but whether any would be made his Lordship could not un dertake to say. An opinion, however, prevails, that the bill will not come into operation before the end of the year. - SALE OF BLOOD STOCK. The undermentioned horses, the property of General Anson, were sold yesterday at Tattersall's, with their engagements ; A chestnut mare (foaled in 1847), by Gladiator— Guineas. Marchesina 50 A chestnut filly, two years old, by lago, out of ICrusade (no engagement) lB A chestnut filly, two years old, by John o'Gaunt, dam by Gladiator—Marchesina lB Baze, two years old, by Cotherstone, out of Gos samer 34 Clommunist, two years old, by Don John, lago, ,or Joe Lovell—Crim Con.'s dam, &c 44 Thl.‘ Druid, two ye ars o ld, by Cotherstone—The A ..bbess 67 A c.hostnut colt, three years old, by Don John— PcNt entia &c 4O A bar' gelding, three years old, by Tearaway, out of AtArgaret, &c l9 A bay gelding, three years old, by Theon, out of Louhla , &c. (no engagement) 44 Lady M.aigaret, three years old, by Ithuriel, out of Ellipt is, &e. 110 Rolando, a. bay gelding, four years old, by Or lando, Gokisacler, &c 6B Bull's-aye, four years old, by Don John, out of Lollypop, & c SS CRICKET. THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MATCHES. - ETON v, WINCHESTER. This match wart resumed yesterday at Lord's. The score stood as follows at the close of the day : WINCHESTER. Second Innings. First Innings. R. T. Burney, Esq., c Northey, b Marrillier W. Eliot, Esq., b Pinney 7 b M arr illi er 4 T. Robinson, sq., b Pinney... 29 b Bagge 44 W. H. Awdry, Esq., b Yorke.. 31 c Wodehouse,b Bagge 1 H. Gillett, Esq., hw, b Pinney 0 b Hoare lB A. Robinson, Esq., c Hoare, b Pinney C. H. Pilkington, Esq., run out 24 b Bagge H. Beckley, Esq., b Marrillier 3 run out J. A. Bramly, Esq., c Northey, b Marrillier ll run out F. Stephens, Esq., b Hoare..... 0 not out J. Aldridge, Esq., not out 0 hw, b Bagge 1-b 6, w 13, n-b 1 2O b 2,1-b 4, wl3 Total 126 ETON. Total.. First Innings. Second Innings. E. Tremlett, Esq., b Emily_ 7 Ibw, b Bramly ...... 0 A. Hayter, Esq., bA. Robinson 3 c Burney, b Bramly 17 H. Hoare, Esq., c Elliott, b A Robin son G. Dupuis, Esq., b Bramly 0 R. S. Bagge, Esq., b Bramly 6 c Bramly, b Robinso n 31 F. North e y , E sq., b Bramly l9 not out ............. 5 Hon. M. Rolle, b Bramly E. Wodehouse, Esq., b Bramly 3 J. Pinney, Esq., b Bramly 1 J. Yorke, Esq., b Bramly 0 not out . .......... C. Marrillier Esq., not out 2 ..... 17 1-b 6, wlO l6 b 2, 1-b 1, w 7 •• „ • 10 Total 66 Total B2 The match was resumed this morning at eleven o'clock. THE ELEVEN OF ENGLAND v. TWENTY-TWO - - - OF HUNGERFORD-PARK CLUB. This great mateh, having been commenced on Thurs day in Hungerford-park, was brought to its conclusion on Saturday, with the accompanying results—the ulti mate result, however, being that the Eleven were beaten by nine wickets. The final score stood thus : THE ELEVEN. First Innings. Second Innings. Hillyer, b Bunllrin c Everett, b Y onge 1 Arnold, c Frere, b Yonge 3 run out .............. 1 Parr, b Burgin 4 b Burgin.. ............... 17 Anderson, b BuiTin 4 c Bradf or d , b Yonge 6 S. Parr, c Ridding, b Yonge l3 cG. Graham,l3Yonge 0 Caffyn, b Burgin 1 b Yonge ............... 1 Cxsar, c Graham, b Burgin Box, not out l5 b Yonge ............... A. Clarke, b Burrin 0 not 0ut....... 4 Clarke, b Burgin 0 b Burgin ...............0 A. Mynn, Esq., b H. Frere wide 1 1 1-b 1, NV 5 ............ 6 Total . 54 ANGERFORD-PARR. Total 5-4 First Innings. Second Innings. W. Brooks, Esq., b Hillyer 2 cS. Parr, b Hillyer 3 Mr. J. C. Free, b Clarke 2 b Clarke 3 H. Simmonds, Esq., b Clarke.. - 2 c Parr, b Hillyer ...•• 0 C. Bradford, Esq., b Hillyer,... 6 not out 1 C. Everett, Esq., b Clarke 0 C. A. Leigh, Esq., c Parr, b Hillyer 5 c Parr, b Clarke ..... 0 G. Graham, Esq., b Clarke 3 b Clarke .... 0 ... .. ....... J. Frere, Esq., b Hillyer 1 cA. Cla r k e , b H illyer 0 J. Smith, Esq., b Hillyer. 7 b Hillyer.. ••1 V. Ridding, Esq., s box, b Hillyer E. J. Morres, Esq., b Hillyer ll s Box, b Clarke ...... 3 E. Trevillian, Esq., b Hillyer 1 b Clarke . C. Slocock, Esq., 113 w, b Hill- .............. 0 yer lB not out . C. Wombwell, Esq., c A. Clarke, b Hillyer 3 b Clarke ..................... 0 b Hillyer . 0 c Parr, b Clarke, ........ H. Frere, Esq., b Clarke ... 11 2 0 Rev. G. Wells, run out C. A. Graham, Esq., b Clarke 1 G. Yonge, Esq., s Box, b Clarke 2 F. Edridge, Esq., b Clarke 5 Major Willes, b Hillyer 2 Rev. W. H. Hicks, not out 1 Burrin, b Hillyer w 2, n-b 1_ ..... 6 1-b 1, n-bl.. Total ............. 78 T0ta1..,,,,,, THE ELEVEN OF ENGLAND v. TWENTY-TWO OF I ZINGARI. THE ELEVEN. First Innings, 10 Caesar, b Taylor ............ Arnold, 1 b w, b Taylor.. . .. Caffyn, b Drake... .......... Parr, b Dr a k e S. Parr, c Balfour, b Drake Anderson, s Chitty, b Drake Box, c Taylor, b Drake A. Marshall, Esq., run out A. Clarke, b Taylor Eillyer, run out Clarke, not out wide, 1 Total 39 I ZINGABI. First Innings. 1 0 Earl Strathmore, b Parr Hon. C. Lyon, c Caffyn, b Clarke Hon. S. Ponsonby, run out E. Balfour, Esq., b Clarke C. Norman, Esq., run out.. Hon. E. C. Leigh, b Clarke F. Bathurst, Esq., c Caffyn, b Clarke C. G. Taylor, Esq., b Caffyn E. T. Drake, Esq., b Caffyn A. Baillie, Esq., c Anderson, b A rno ld C. Morse, Esq., b Arnold ............ ...... Hon. E. Bligh, b Arnold. ................... Lord Burleigh, c and b Caffyn B. Broughton, c Box, b Arnold E. Tredcroft, Esq., b Ar no ld u J. Chitty, Esq., b Arnold l3 Earl of Leicester, b Caffyn 2O W. Fellows, Esq., b Arnold 0 Captyin Mundy, c Anderson, b Arnold 22 Lord Paget, b Arnold 0 E. Hartopp, E sq. , b Caffyn 0 J. L. B aldwin, Esq. not out 2 b 1, Lb 1, wide I, 11-131 4 12 .. 17 . 15 . 32 0 20 Total. 2OO The rnAtch reoumed thie raorniag at eleveri, •, n SHIPPING INTELLIGRiv CUSTOM -HOUSE, AUGUST 1. , ENTERED INWARDS.— The Union, from jog, Maria, Songstress, Wyvern, Lisbon • Lebanon, , Petrouella, Hana • Kleine, Bernard% Uddowf "[Tao, Richebuct'o ; Gosforth, Memel; Thom; Shanghai; Minerva, Punta Arenas; Windermere, Henrich Carstensen, Sundswall ; Chrjs t ir in i e so ry' Cherub, Gergente ; John Henry, Bahia k JP" cum ; Commerc e , Dantzic ; Wilhelm , ditto; ditto ; Anne Dorothea, Hadsund; Oscar, Lemoig ; Fides, Pillau ; Sea fr Schedam, Memel ; Lively, ; Cronstadt ; V l °`" -- , t Araby Maid, Mauritius Norman, St. Jt l l id e ,lY William, Leer; Anna, Struer ; Union, do; g° • 11, zic ; Corsair's Bride, Mauritius and the CLII Hernnch, Riga ; Anna, Rostock ; Mountainli,s Robert, Syd ney ; M arch. of Bute, Cadiz ; St t ' rd a t; t tiana ; the Ballangeich, Penang ; Wieden, walla Zolls erein, Dantzic ; Mina, Jamaica ; Stet"' for stettill; zic ; James, Trinidad & Bermuda ;Wolf, Havanna ; Gleaner, Almeira ; Blenheim, Mem el 'l West Coast of Africa ; Beulah, Port Philip ; Dram ; Stag, Mauritius ; Julia, St. John's, -"l o ,, wick ; J ane Francis, Launceston; Agnes, Or, n , graph, Cronstadt ; Petrel, St. Petersburg ; br - Juntina, Skive ; Patriot, Oporto ; Dio Hobise. Th ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING.- - --1 Antwerp • Windermere Geelong ; NorthfloLv , land, Riborg,' Copenhagen; Ornen, Kiel Af roF Breeze, Caen ; Marchiena, Rotterdam ; ijcwtr-Ws;' Elizabeth, Antwerp; Ballengrich, Quebec; -15/0 17 Trinidad; Wilhelmina, Hamurg ; Saxon, .4)r Santipore, Hobart Town. Six, Crow. The CLEARED OUTWARDS W ITH CARGO.-- f Cape Pal ma ; John Myers, Cherbourg ; City ° f a t Quebec ; Marie, Havre; William and 11 °1r Blackwell, Port Philip ; Ell en, H avre; ~ s New South Wales. VESSELS SPOKEN WITH' Tho Robert, 9th July, lat. 34 N., long. 44 W' The Mogul, sth J une, lat. 22, long. 61. The ship Bellcarrig,LlVE RloPadioOngLioAr CeylonUG.l. forth e 1 head Dock, took fire, which, however, was .r. 40 guished without doing much damage. .43, 4 " The Conquest, bound west, was spoken "' lat. 46 N., long. 56 W. .00, 1 0 The Britannia, from Q ue b ec, was spoken _AO lat. 46 N., l ong. 5 6 W. psor The Niag ara , R . M .S., Liverpool to Boston, 0 with July 28, lat. 55 N., long. 23 W. e l 1' The Blore nge , P ort Phillip to London, was , July 26, lat. 49 N. , l ong. 19 W. JO visi ir Quatre Sceurs, Martinique t o Marseilles, id with, July 15, lat. 38 N., long. 46 W. ...„ 0 010 The Leopold, B os t on t o Buenos Ayres, was) July 16, lat. 47 N ., l ong. 45 W. ' The Strathfieldsay, (whaling voyage), was July 13, lat. 36 N., long. 57 W. COUNTRY MARKETS. i CHELMSFORD—Jura' 29• tito f 1 We had a large supply of wheat to-day fc ' rt rai f t , year, and the better samples barely maintaine d l i e l, prices, with a dull sale, whilst inferior q' ` so sales were pressed, were sold at less money without without alteration in value, and little doing i'm Vo teh o a Prices to-day were as follow :—Wheat, wul i l ef,' to 60s Od, new 40s to 58s ; red, old 40s to or; . 04 518; barley, 25s to 278; chevalier, 31a to 0 5 4 ,. Ø '6 1 0 21s to 278; malt, 56s to 598 ; chevalier, 5 . 6 . 8 :330 1 ) ....... ~,,,,, 19s to 25s ; peas, partridge, 32s to 378 ; white, na boiling 39s to 42s ; dun, new 318 to, le' to 37s ; Harrow ticks, 33s to 395; lefazagari, "'" COLCHESTER—JULY 30. (I°' A good supply of wheat, for which the trade P ip g; i ; at about Is per qr. under last week's p!ice s ', corn but littl e p ass i ng, and no alteration in ne 11' of rain ha s f a ll en d uring the week. 44 lei1 ei Prices to-d a y were as follow :—Wheat, white, 253; red, 48s to 54 s ; b ar l ey, 28s to 33s ; oats, 20 3 t° 4 oo; p °'" Mazagan, 36s to 38s; middle and small, 38 s to white, 4.0 s to 42s ; grey, 38s to 40s. KIRKCALDY—JULY 30. i f of 14 10 (.1' At this day' s mar k e t we had a fair supP 0 q v , which sold r ea dil y a t f rom 6d to is per qr. ad 11 3,40 °' week's prices. Oats in small supply, an d slow week's prices. Two small parcels of barley.l 138 I I Wheat. Barley. Oats. 100 6,1 First Second Third sls Od I 00s Od I 22s Od to 04 ' Oatmeal, per bag of 2801bs imperial, 31s Od t ° ~i re? Official Statement of the Quantities of Corn, '"rte, in the port o f L on d on, from the following r , the 25th to the 30th July, both inclusive. g e- pzl Colchester Harwich Leigh Malden 320 - 215 - 281 - 1402 - 7 0 0 19 - COAL MAR KET — Auo. 1. -F„. , k t:***: i DI Prices of Coal p er t on at the close of the .- e ' ff s. d.I Chester Main,,,, 16 6'Eden Main .......... •.11a Daviso's West Hartley 18 I=l Lambton Primrose '' ...1° 7 Hedley 's Hartley; 17 0, Hetton ....... '''''l ; . H01ywe11....... ... : . lB 6Belmont .............. .. .+, Longridge's Wst HartleylB o;Braddyll ............ .....1 North Percy Hartley l7 o!Haswell .............• ......18 . R avens W. HartleylB OiLambton ............ ":::M. . 17 Redheugh Main 15 9 Peusher .... . ....... ,g Tanfield Moor l6 3' Russell's 'lletton•• ..... „ , , 6 Tanfield Moor Butes l6 :3,Stewart's ................ :.'„ West Hartley 18 O)Whitwell ........... ~ ... ' 11 Wylam 18 OCassop ............... ..,.. 0 Wallsend, &c. Kelloe .... .. ............ „ , Acorn Close l7 6,South Kelloe ....... • .... 11 'IS Hedley 17 31 Backhouse ......... ".‘.:.- . .. „.• 16 Lawson l6 biTees .. ... ... . ... .•• • g Riddell l7 OiPease's West .......... "'‘ 1, Framwellgato l7 6iCowpen .. .. . • • •••.,''''' ' : ll Team Hartley .. ... l7 01Grey's West ........ ''' Smith's West Hartley ~ 18 0 86. Ship at mark e t 99 1 Sold SEABORNE MAILS. by (N signifies that the Malls are sent from the Gener a/ the night—and Mby the morning —dispatch.] • 8 -- -ut.ptitcn..; 0 61 6 1 Day when made up F rom what Aid, COI7NTRIES. in General Post- Port or:l Office, London.* Di s p a tched. 4 .,..<1 -....._ - America(byllrit.pack)s N Every Friday .... Li ver pool ••. A America (byynited St. ok packet) .... • • ....N Aug. 9 .....• - - Liverpool •" 11 America (13y U. States of. packet) .... •• • ...N Aug. 3 .......... Southampto n Australia (via South -0 a ktl6 Ditto ampton) .....• • • .M Sept. 4 .....• •• . . Southampton (via MarseillesN Sept. 8 ........ ... Dover .• •• " c Ditto (via Cape o f Go o d , pledHope) •• • • .N August 4 ...... - London •• • • ill 1 Africa (West Coast) ..N July 30 .....• •_ - Plymouth •• 0 4 Alexandria ...• • • .. N 8,9, 24, & 30 of m Dover .• • • %., * utug',, s 4 Alexandria.— .• • • ..M ith & 20th of mon. Southampton) of BBahamas . - - • • • • "M 2nd of the month SouthamPWD 9104'0 elgium ...... •• • . ..N Da11y... ... ••• • .. Dover ...1•„ Atikii Brazil -.. .•• • • . ..M 9th of the month.. SouthamPO„ - pig' 0 Buenos Ayres . ...... •M 9th of the month.. SouthamPl°- UP Cape of Good Hope ..N 14th of the month Plymouth •• 6 4 Cape of Good Hope ..N Plymouth • • op Cape de Verde ....N 14th of the month. Plymouth •• 4 6 1 Ceylon (see India) ApP li , 9 Ceylon .•• • . • ..N 14th of the month Plymouth •• 01 1 ; 0 1 Channel 151e5 ,.., ••.. N 3lon.,Wed.,Barid. southamPO,nn I Chili. ... -..•• • • • ...31 2d & 17th of month SeuthaMPO'" I China (see India) ilk 4 Constantinople ...• ..N 7 , 8 ,17,21,&27 °fin. Dover •• • • •• , OP AP' Constantinople •... &. .. 1 4th & 20th of mon Southauptor l , ro jov - Cont. of Europe M N Twice daily ...... Dover .....• ' _461 1 / Egypt (see India) . 5 , 07 France .....• •.M & N Twice daily •. Dover .• .• •'„ Atli' Gibraltar ..... . ..M 4, 7.17, 20, 27 ofm. southamPl° - 4 /1 . Greece (see India; th O il ' 4°. Greytown .. .... ....NI 2nd & 17th of mon. 4outhaMP-n TeOtAl Hamburgh .....• ....N Tuesday & Friday London •• • • • . riTiote . Havannah .....• ....el 2nd of 'the month Southampton 60' 1 6 Holland ... • • . . ..... Al Wednesday & Sat London •• • %., , vg• 4 Honduras .. •• • ••. • M, 17th of the month Southampto n , 031 nptoe o ff 4 India (viaSouthampt.)M 4th & 20th of mon. Soathel India (via Marseilles)M Bth& 24th of month Dover .• •• •• . 0 0 lonian Isles (see India) 1 40 ; Ireland ........M & N Twice d a il y ....- Holyheed,:„. . at sa. 16 Lisbon ......... in .....M 7,9, 17, &28 of . Southampton tig•,,6 Madeira • ..... 31 9th of the mo n th SouthamPl°•• • , " Madeira .... - ..... N July 30...... „ Plymouth • 1 0 MMalta (see India) .. . Aug' alta ...... • • • . ....N 7,17,19,28, 30 o f m. Dover ... Mauritius (see India) 1 6 . 118 4 1 pton • ; Mauritius ..........N 14th of the month Plymouth • • . T- M ex i co .. e" Naples.... _ ........N sthlsth26thormon Dover •• •: o ' 4 ; Mll e " New Granada ...... AI 2d & 17th of month SoutharaP.. 4i irjoe New Zea1and.......... By private ship .. Various P ° '`' . Mk 3 Papal States ........ N i thl s th 2 sthofknon Dover • • •:,: n . 08141 Peninsula ..........M 7 th l7 th2Bthofmon SoutharnPn, Arri:. Peru „•• . • •.......M 2d & 27th of mon iout h a m 17 . up ; Port Natal ..........N 14th or the month Plymouth ulf• ; N sthlsth2sthofrnon, Dover •••• •• teg• o f Tuscany .. .. fi Venezuela .....• .... 31 2d & 17th o f month southeroPt o Van Diemen's Land (see a „vet Australia) .. •„„. 2......... t011*- - . West Indies ........ M 2d& 17th of month SouthEnL $ AO * When any of th ese dates fall on a Sunday, the e 04 8 dispatched on the following day, with the exception ef,% tamed Southampton), and the Malta, both of which will be am „ — . day preceding. A 400 LONDON Printed and Published by WIRD— 11 of No. 112, Strand, Printer, at TU Sun Office , Strand; in the Precinct of the Savoy, the 9 0 — Xiddlemo; Tubby, Ausuot 2,1863, --=-- _.----- . ri 1 pf °'' - , 20 , 316/ 11)1 1 \ . WEI b e Oa WE, forenoo Initted, expres s Harding Copy Parotid LO: wk;rA Lakes, i Genel R° The and exp SCIEN• .._and FR. . 4 7) at tn" 'ICKL print e E Open Clitiaret I____ .- - -11 4 A1 road) the wee of the the'T c ;fladrlll Fri ~.._ All fined i , tares ex desk,. , cutlery, Itork-ta the sole tooth-br Beware address, ............_ T d J, c amr itichard The Ret Captain Roger G Char] es coin's George w. Hal The Deed oi treed as mad mil NE , lonowir goods ti The t and CFI &e., at The A for the E. 3la by a di: and tun for spot than at The 1 avail II Selectic of E. superb) export, most pc Ship tlemen kingdoi CAU pnhlic talseho the Up obvlottl ~, BIRTRS. OF A SO. On th e 28th ult Badswort N h-hall, Yorkshire,R.On the 29th ult., s. at Clapham-park, the wife of Thornton West, Esq. OF A DAUGHTER. On the 29th u lt , in Endsleigh-street, Tavistocks4lll're the wife of W. :Atherton, , M York, the wife of cot. On the 29th m ult., at the Mount Richard, Quin, R.N. MARRIED. glfre j On the 28th Albion- at St. Philip's Church, Dalsu ° ll, Jap e ' Stewart, Esq., of road, Dalston, to Elizabeimf the third daughter of Henry Richard Barlow, 15(1 '' Queen's-road, Dalston. DIED. a s °f On the 21st tilt. at at Nervi, near Genoa, the C ounts Minto, aged 67. . 1,or" On the 27th ult , at Freeland, Perthshire, J-araos, Ruth Ott the ven, aged 75.. late of 26th ult , at Bath, John Patrick, ES'!" Fenchurch-street,.aged 58. i oocl' On the 29th ult., William Wall, Esq., of 13 " 11-17 aged 81. ____........--• 1 M 13 deslt SING I gives t N[l tletn a , tion, w 'Would 1 referen Londe ox or Itlnn! Long 8 4. as, Lon( 3, lirax Shef lltaker Men Ml DR lloctc it A SO, _ I V I