The Sun. — London, England, 1811-02-07 00:00:00

. . et suing Out :the . wit, by any paints looking to either or each' of 'the writ et warrant. This be ing the, state of the evidence for the prosecution), be (the Onlntion Serjeant) went with confi. dence, to the Jury, knowing, from his instruc. lions 'that he should be able co mp letel y to cut up Mr. Smithson's evidence ; knowing also, that ft was an established rule of proceeding, that in indictments for pciury, oath against Oath was not enough to warrant a conviction, but that in ad dition thereto, the charge of guilt most be borne out by documentary evidence, or by aututehing eke sufficient to give it a fair and retetottable preponder. ante. In 111 , S C4O there was mantle to support Hataisun's evidence, if :hat o! Smitesun's was cut off; and that no reedit could be paid to it lie lead clearly ettewn..-419t wittleSS having seturti three (lit. facet times over, that lie had seen, vatti his own eyes, the. ifidorsemetit of the date of she writ mark ed in the cornier of the ‘,4 air aor , although 03 pro. tittetioll of the warrant by the Shedd, it plainly ap. peared that there was no such itsdorsemeni, nor any peatance of erasure on the warrant. On the face of the writ there was nothing to support Harrison's evidence, if that' of Smithson was cut otf ; because, in a writ of fi. fir. there was no accredited officer to give authetiticity to the indorsement, as was the ',ante in wt its issuing in Nestle Process. Neither the person belonging to the office whence the writ was issued, nor' toe person by whom naves sealed, was called mete indorse a writ of ,fi. fa. or in any other way to. welch to it any mask of authenticity. The person who sued out'a writof,fi.p. henget' put the iedureemetit upon it, and that was only fits own set. It was to be observed too, that here the levy had been tirade Oil the t ills, after the plaintiff lied givett notice 01 dissolving injunction, but hetiee it had le est 'dissolved; so it must have been eitreineli conet idea for him, if lie could puree himselt from contempt ,by an act of his own. He submitted to the Court, theiefure, that to prove this tatattlfitti part of the ease, there was nothing het llarrison's, own evidence, , anepetted I,ty hie own writing, Which coald be nu het ter them liis r Wester, audCeuld not add to it, whether true or (i+e. 'ate evidence as to the falsity uf Smithson's testimenny v hatiliVer, did riot rest here, but the oticer also swore that there was nothing on the wartatit to import that the %V lit issued on the eilt of Aptil ; Ots the contrary, that he himself bellevial at the time thin it had trot issued tilt that day, being the t ito April. Common Serjeent, there=fore, weet to the Jury wills deal denee that, ue such evidenee• th ey cou ld not f i nd the defeedant guilty. The Attorney Genets! him. aelt did not enable motet upthe evidence of Smith son, but told the Jury, that because Harrison swore that the writ was sued hut on the eth April, and the writ itself told the ' same thing, that therefore they must - take the lea to be so. But what was this but the evidence of Harrison himself, confirming by his oath his own testimony in writing ? Teere could be no doubt, buweter, /hat the Jury warede. ceived by this ingenious device of the Attorney (le. peal, and Isere induced to take this, which amount ed to nothing, as a coafitteation of Harrison's les ' tiiriony. Common Seljeant athnitted that Mr. .Xing was far hoitt being excusable in making the etS.tavit be had made. Fie submitted, howet er, that he *as not the cabled of punishment, deceived a , he bad been by the infinniattoo he had received, m arled at it was with csery probability attentiing the case. ilatrison, it was admitted, ells a needy Item and.yet, with an elocution .for against the defectileit, was it to. be presumed that he should have remained in a state of inaction, with , this exc. cution in his pocket tiont the 4th to the t ftli„April xr ts is situation, houever, the levy not being made till the t I tit, the dee indent eersonally waited on the 001%er, Wit,isitig to t e litiUitnetl Ot the date of suing oet.the writ, whou'the officer cola him it had not beets sued out tills that day. Not satisfied, !weever, with tfits infietnatioe, he sent a messenger to the °dicer, biought back similar information in wilting. The oft .er was caned on die trial, and sewed that hi' had so informed the defendant; that lie believed this to be the tact at the time; and that, if put to his oath, he Would hate sworn that rather thanotherwise. The infottiaation to thedelendant, htnveverot direct, aid in sweating upon such in formation, through lee might have acted-tacautiottaly, — is was by _no Means apparent that he did so know ingly, falsely,tar corruptly. The Noble and Learned Jodge put it to the Jury, if they believed that this was. done from a colourable motive ? lord Eetatisat eouon said, as he thought thi, a case of inaportatice, he had stated front writing the greeter part, of what he had addresard' to the Jury. It was to this Calla, whether the Deliiudant was to cooaidt red as having used ail fair, reasonable, and proper means of ietonnasion ;or wash u* a C lour and contrivance for laying a.f,iundation for the attachment in the first instance, and a defeece against. the charge of petite y afterwards ? Mr. Cestame SaIt.IBANT eantinited. He had hi e sted on the trial, that no knowledge of the dent of lilting out the wii, could have' been eolleaed hum the office, they knowing of the date °false 1 nth of Aprii alone, and that this information could' be got unly titan the party against , him. He now a tt e. mitt d, that the evidence of Harrison, and of the lielotteree .t . on the win, were one and the same, colisisficg of his own testimony tmeoefirmed, ex cept by th,' ink, which with a ttn he had put on the back of that ern. Eveet as against property such a test tinotty fousi be uitgoestionable; bus, in a question' as to crime, it was ody as oath against oath, and thereto,' kkas not to he 'listened to.' Their Lordships need h. idly be told of how great impqrtanoe such a question as this was to the public. .If the defendant was to be coocluded guilty by this verlia,it was hi the rwer of the Court to imprison hint for ease, two, e r s nore years, and they bad the power, its addition to this, to lake front bun any part of his property that might still remain to him. They might once, twice, or oftener, inflia on him the most infamous t ied disgraceful punishment known in this country, 61) , 1 alter all, might banish him beyond seas for seven years. Such constquences as these, he submitted to the Cowl, woe hot to be incurred on slight evi. (levee. He did not ask of the Court to find the defendant not guilty; than the law would not al. 1,014 DON: Printed by itICHAk Sit this Sus-PrP, low. nut he witted, what the law warranted him in asking. that he might not be condemned on un satisfofitury evidence; but that he might ts.utre an other opportunity of having Iris case tried before a, Jury of his county. He had only further to thank their Lordships for the indulgence Mr. King hrid re ceived on account of the state of his health. Lord Et a .LttrillOßOUGH, after con4ultiog with the other dtuiges, desired the Common Serjeant to take his Rule to spew cathe ; and that the writ of ji.fe. and the warrant should be got out of the hands of the persons in Whose custody they bow were, and be in CoUlt s On strewing cause. The 41,TTORSBY GENERAL asked, if the memo randum obtained by Mr. King's boy from the officer, as In the date of the writ, appeared from In, I oidship's notes to have been given in evidence on ti a trial'? His Lordship said it did seem to have been given in evidence. • Mr. ATTORNEY GENERAL then produced it. The Rule was then granted, but the defendant • was ordered to stand committed.. Mr. COlklMoN SERJBANT bald Mr. King %as ready t o g ive bail to any amount. Lord Er.t.cNsounuott said the Court could not depart trout its established rules, except by consent. The defendant aec , .rdin4ly stood committed to the custody of the Marshal. HARRISON V. XING. A Rule had been ob tained a few days ago, call ing upon the e liiiniiir to shew cause wk, the writ of ca. so. in flit. cause, should !Mt be set aside, and the stun of I '2OOl. IWO in the hoods of the net Le returned to the detendant, for so much money as really appeared due to the plaintiff' (atter deducting what had been before paid hi r 1), to be retained in the hinds of the , Sheriff, and th, nce paid over to the plaintif: and on Tuesday the A.ttorney, General stiewed Cause agilinut but he admitted that, as the plaintifillad aimed); obtained no less than t,3(s4r. he thought, in strict equ!ty, he was entitled to nu more than the duktence 'between that and 45001. the amount of his claim •by a verdict obtained for' tielamatfou, together with welt costs as were due to him, which, in the 'whole appear to be 3171. I2s. 4d. Lord ILLl,utisottonun said, " certainly that was as mud' as it) justice he bad a right to seek. He had brOUliht au WWII against the Sheriff to - obtain that which his verdict fur slander had, given him, and whether ono party'or another paid it, whether the Sheriff' by his o%a hands, or through the ban& 'of the defendant himself, (as appeared now to be the case) it WVS - 4360 and the same thing. His Lordship also thought that as the defendant was obliged to come with this application, he ought to bo allowed his twits 'lot it. Rule absolute as to the restraining of 3.17.1. 1 2i. 4d. for the use of the plaintiff, in hands of the Sheriff, iostead of 12001. c.utrar OF COMMON PLEAS, Frs. 6. WF.LBII V. FLOWER. Mr. Serjeant BE:ST MOM' in this case to set aside the verdiCt. It appeared that the plaintiff had re. ceived ri check from the defendant, in payment for an ox, bought at Souiliall. WI MI it WA% presented, a second check wait given, payable at another bank- Mg-house, Which stOpped payment before the; ;imprint of the check could be received. The plain. tiff obtained a werdio for the Value of the check. It was contended that the plain►iff could not . recover, and that the verdiCt ought to be set aside, on the ground, first, that t'i►e check was void, because it had been,given ten miles trout London without a stamp, reunited by the Act of the 3 1 3t. of the King ; se eon•.lly, that it bad been given when there was no moue► in tt►e hands of the person to whom it was sent for payment. The,Co►trt was on the point of deciding on the merittof.the check, when the Chief Justke rose to :attend the Privy Council. The other proceedings were not important. • A fire 'broke out on Saturday, at Mr. Daniell's, Coach-maker, in Greek-street, Soho, which, by the early arrival of the. fire-engines, and the prompt assistance of the work Men and others, was got out without spreading to any greater extent. • Sunday morning, six o'clock, a Coal-heaver, of the name of William Gary, who lodged in Cur•. tier's-row, Blackfriars, was discovered ..,hanging, suspended by a cord, fastened to the tester of the bedstead j he was immediately cut down, but quite dead, The cause of his having committed this rash 44 is supposed to have been a family dispute i he has left a wife and four children. Mouday evening, eight o'clock, as Mr. Probet, of Fore•strcef, Moorfields, was coming from Dol , ; wieh, in a onc.horse chaise, one of the wheels came off in consequence of the lynch pin coming out, when the vehicle overturned in the Borough, by which MO. had one of his shoulders dislocated and was otherwise much bruised, and was convey. ed home in a coach. _ _ Moot Sues.--Languet and Stow relate, in their Chronicles, that in the year 1233, upon the 7th of April, limn! suns were seen besides the natural sun, (which, in those days of ignorance and superstition, were ascribed to be the forerunners of war, famine, peatilencea„, &c. Sm.) for as those Chronicles testify, there were touch strife and dissension stirred up be tween Henry the Third'and the lords of his king. darn; for the very next year England was visited by fire and sword troraWales to Salisbury, which town was bi:lnt anon after, attended with a great drought and, pestilence. Also in the year 1466, thiee suns made their appearance but the day before the three tau is, Edward, Earl of March, with the Earl of Pembroke, and the Earl of.Wiltshire, fought the great battle at Mortimer's Cross, as Stow atfirmeth, in which the Earl of March put the others to $i ht, with great destruction of their soldiers. Iwo -more irtatances are also chronicled • one by Fulk in his Meteors, who a, that in the year 1526, to. wards , the slatighter of Lewis the Second, King of Hungary, three suns marched forth. The second instance is tat by lnemond, who saith, that in the year 1619, were three also 'seen at Lovain, in the month of May, at sun EDINBURGH, FEB. I. HIGH COURT Of ADMIRALTY. Douc,LAS AND COMPANY V. TILLEft. wastt private Criminal promotion at tt a in. educe of Tf . mois Dunlop D,iuglas, Archibald Douglas, and James Graham, merchants and un- derwriters in Glasgow,. against James Teller, 'mer chant in Ayr. 'llle charge was that Mr. 'fetter had given a I.ll+e rvprvsentation el the totatti of a certain vessel, with a view to get insurance elfeeted upon her and t!►at, in consetittenee of this false representation, the ‘.ro,4ecotors had agreed to insure her, but that they refrained Irutu dying so, because they abet wards thsenvvred the incorrettness of the insurer's stmemetit. No such prosesution ever oc- curred before : and this on:was not at the lost:vice of the Public Prosecutor, but .at the instance of the priVato underwriters, with concourse of his Ma jesty's Advocate, that concourse being what almost every private patty can coMmand, • The case being supposed so be of a maritime na- ;me, was brouglit into the Court of Admiralty on the .9th day of November, 181 u. The panne! pirated"• Not Guilty, and accompamed this plea with a solemn assevera►ion of i►►s innocence, and a very short statement, which went to show that the pro. seeutors were completely eoistahen in •• their idea of thet facts. . His Counsel then.objezied to the Prose ct'tor'a title, to pursue noon this wound—that . the intli6tnient itself bore that , tire itTitutanc4 bad not beeu rtfected; that, consequottly, Itlore had been no injury done to their property ; . and that, there fore, they had no interest in the prusecution. This argument having been answered by. the prosecutors, the ple;imittaty def: nee was tepell:d. The Panners 7 ' Intel then stated : that their sole view, in advattoi tat deteoce, wam..not to prevent a trial, but to be le to their (Aleut the benefit • a a trio], which, him being ascert,ined to be carried pct at the instance of a compete..t party, could lead to a itgal isin.e, instead of tur.iing out altogether nugatory and that, thelefime, altogether the relic vaney of the libel seemed very questionable, they did not intend to insist on any objettion upon that ground. The Judge-Adrpral, however, ta prop. ia 111.0lig, stated, that, although he bad repelled the ohjeetion to the prosteu - tors' title, be had great doubts of the relevancy of art libel which they had raised ; and that he wished the Counsel upon both sides to discuss this doubt; Upon this suggestion of tue Court, an Argument arose, anu was followed out to considerable fulness.. Thu view of the ptosecti 7 tors amounted to this, that although the policy had not been signed, and thus the crime was not completed, yet that, in the circumstances of the case, this attempt amounted to an indidab , e offence. The view taken by the panners counsel was, that no such attempt could be prosecutea as a crime ; that, even. if the pannel's intentions bad been itn. proper (which, however, was solemnly denied) ) and had been nautili) , carried into effedt, tbie. would nut amount to 0 crime by. the lOW ci 64;01140d ; and that /his was so clear, that the prosecutors had apparently mooned to the trial merely ss c mode of harassing an insurer, and exposing-We to Uhmerit. ed obloquy. Alter the debate,. t .Lutfge- M—. ordered the parties to sit.* in vititten intor. mations. • The proseetitorriloded theirs on the gOth of No vember; ilt It was always, and we understand, most justly treated in ate Cowl sit learned, elabo rate and abler-alie panne), before this inform tion had been seen by him, or any of liht, Counsel, gave in to the Court a minute (gth November, 18 10), setting tomb, that he did not Intsgn to give in any information upon his part. The wound of this resolution was stated to be, iftat, entisciOns of leis innocence, he rival anxious tiff a trial ; . that he had not at first objected -to tt,e relevancy, until or dered to plead to it by the Coast; that he could not, formally wave the ohjettiort that butt been raised from that quarter, because, it the libel was really irrelevant,. his not ohjeding to it could not cure it; but that he was so little anxious to have it found irrelevant, that he would not say a ~word in any information to strew its impropriety ; and that if the Judge, on considering the written argument of the prosecutors by itst:ll, without, any answer, could find the libel relevant, he would rejoice in the opportunity which such an interlocutor would ill'ord him of testifying his int‘ocence. The Court, on advising this minute, with the full information of the prosecutors (21st December ' lass), proposed to adjourn, in order to give the pan nel an opportunity est answering the - i.vritteit plead- ''' ing of the other patty. The panne]. stated, that he had seen that very able pleading, but as be was not anxious to avoid a trial, he %veld not an swer it. The Court was adjourned till the 28th of January, 181 t. When that day arrived, no information was given in for the panne!, and the Judge-Admiral .was obliged Co decide upon the pleading of the prosecu tors alone; Notwithstanding all this, and aims t.ikiug (we have heard) the best advice which this country ' aflbrds, his Lordship determined, that the libel was irrelevant ; that is, that even it the facts averred. in the indidineot were true, they did not constitute a crime by the law of Scotland, and therefore dis missed the pannel from the bar. A motion was then made by the pannel to have the expences, which' he had been obliged to incur in denuding himself from a prosecution which had now beet' declared illegal, thrown. upon the prose cutors. was opposed by them; but the Court, on the grouod • that no relevant charge had been brought, and that the paunch was .entitled to the legal and natural presumption of that innocence which he had always prok.ssed, acceded to this inn. tion, and ordained an account of his expences to be given luau the Clerk. Counsel for Messrs. Douglas and Co., John Clerk, Adam Gillies, Francis -Jeffrey, and J. FL M'Kentie, Esora. Advocates.—Agents, Messrs. Dunlop and Dickson, W. S.—Mr. Jarues Little, Procurator.—Counsel . sr Mr.,Tellin, Hon, Henry Erskine, and Diavid catbe.“ and Henry Cockburn, :Walled; -W. S.—Mr. John Pedt, Procurator. 1) 14ARIUS. Of No. ;‘, NtArtirlt.t olf ittiCt n'• i'k Di . 1 1 044 hp "I AM 3RMtLi El( 1 Multan itr ee t ft; ro :y ermr ; fl — ti ; 01; No. t c, ing Avat;ientortit, Orders .ot luP,.psri Leliteli for the Z4ger are. tfis t e. pa.a), rrilit be add,ess34, t tt KIINNSTT AND A.V0N.......The COMmtn." --- ttvell London and Bristol, by Was t'tre 6 te4 fast week, for thesfirst tints'bY tt ' rival at Bath of 840 sacks of flour , which Wool'; veyed from Newbury, by the Kennett 30, 1 : 4 Canal. While the miniber of t,Orses !eV ~. convey this quantity of flour by laDd,wool.; been one hundred and ninety, sik horso employed-in to aing the b. ats.ou the C 4 03 1. t GRAND JUItiCTION.-1.1. heautilol duel, by whicb the Grand Janotiun Oatial over the river Ouse, near Stoney Stratford , m 0 was opened on the e2d of Ittst month, siaceWo several boats have passed fully ladev. 114 t 4' of this aquedutt is such as to admit of bon 0% The length of the iron-work of which it is o, 1 " 1 " 1 is Int feet. The towing-path is also o f irt A CURIOSITY DISCOVE:3E,D•I 66S . --fra-e tb ' curiosity discovered at a place called L.llll three tniles from Bath. Here was sound.. 3 °1,06 tnent very admirable both for its antiand4 a br t ii i .39, d cir,a) s t,:i t ira r nit u t ta lc u nrt r Niio e . sti f ey r , o s r; il i ci e na ,tticolpys,t rtoentir;i3n,oucrt:iolaect:pott:edal„; it was font teen feet Jung and siy.tan ticJi97o. made of stones of several colours; as blues reu' o e floor Uas very delightful to. behold : round were placed divers' figures; and in the in id ' fi vei -Standing on a sprig. 4t. thoopt to hate 4 i convenience for water. A work of grea c- f l lahour,, and which shewed the excellency or remed to be.it those who 1 0 ' 1 0 ,0 or F'urtu nrte Isles, that it CdUSC S those whilst the reverse is the tir,t tha t the bad qualito t. " 3. 00 dcrtul springs, the gtditnitiveeoershdiolitasriatnuoialkruce:oiconoticrisiointtolbt:i:eoltsf,oiouitic:iiiierc:,:o,ooo.loyi his can2onets : Nc !Ist& ramose di VOituna Due ii touti h a i ; chi di 'poi t;o+at,teri .;lanced by the and v ilitietl also ° t P e i t h r e ar y i l l i : riil Q'S Lela ' lib. a, Cap Bee taut tidendo A sc c chi de I'AltrarrWat',ll‘ au fa ottt at, IMPoSTOR DETECTED.--4 lOW bright say;, that a person, apparently "ILD'elf W. Leek, came some days i t i 'l o ,° buigh, auui existences of an indeset ibable animal in bi 6 l ` i , ) ,ipl which be said b a d been engendered fron,ls„'' swallowed some spawn, among water bCiniP, in the river Gambia, in Africa; I) , ° A ; a o P cc P a e S t i r oTt i a c l u t i m ol e : ll ec in en g ntd i i nt ri du l ' i tt i l s ol s ea : ( e ) i t ) t ig l n a rg il i t ti , :whlifillsicslete-C 1 :: be 'its produced by therefore liw i g () r t i e t o ' O f t - t" I I ; ' it °lit"' jeci i i i" iyrelended to tormented ;, tants, and oti a t i a l i d ne il d " :lL d ity upn f o roa n t t e . n Ce• ,ivaaiapprehended On th e ", :) „ f iatk . , ' carried before W. Mute, Dal. of TwYO-004;1, and . E. Di ew, of Auchenbae, tW ° 10; jest)'s Justiees of the Peace for the s tr ut' ,a "Por being examined by them, he cntlie: e ,,itoe', appearance which he had exhibited' We 1 ,,d 1 4 1010 us• and sttetted ; be was thereur-no, 4 , ustices, adiudged to be an. in fa / jinni as such to "111 1 14.14 the Market!c ross 011 4 t l 9". bareheaded, for an hour , %vitt' ja°loll,l ht 1 t 3 b'enat,.de,ciiptive of his n o‘i n 2 .nt of the Justic e *, w as put into esecutl° i lis ate t roi On Monday last, an Inquest w as hel d o i co ti lliery, near Newcastle, on the WO ~surlier i ?etoat Pitman, who was killed in l e 0. 4 Jinn Walton, on Saturday sesnnigh t. rte and Walton ..had, ammoled along w f tt In" to be bound; and in the coon° ° to il; noun, they had, been disputing ah'`, l i t i 009 Going home towaldoevening, and et- .1,0"4' 4 when they core to the door of Wa ii°ll' ; t in t :o had a setae, which bo c ci till they o t) i . : 11 9t40,. and then Heron get wig c lear 1 , 1) 40,1 inffitc!led tfp the poker, and struck hat",,,ite suite. Walinn , enraged, asked s i'c bayonet, but itnot being in the way, its o ,t R td Heroo. the Y g ave lonia lage knife, with which , Thc Jury aster ';: o 1 t tr.i 4 ( i . w bleb iasied from halt phst nine in 1; ' 0 °l' laser le ast . worst at night .(10 houro 11 „1 1° ,.11, dice ° 1 wth tli murder ag a i n st John counnitTed , for trial. g‘ esterday, at St. Geo ll rg hg e's li , fliitbnolirtf.l4l/2 1<r4t)11)•114,,,,. Bert Walpole„ eldest son of the IS ti°;ctivi t ieft' ..; Ilia Majesty's Ei.vuy Extraordinary 14 , 0„ ,04 to Carolina , y tuingest slaughter ug h t er of the 1,1! ones:tithe Judges of the Supientef .)10:01. Mr. Edward ar I a Lat te Quar t : t Inn - beldst to Miss Ann ientima On Tuesday last, Deal', by the I ",''of 11Pf W. Hughes, ,list' to :‘,lr, Smith; b"" t ll‘4 o' O K::;lt,t4trdillibuKlS)44,4:l::::Psini.eicla:it.l7.-4jr:ouyrita.::::illll.liiiii:ll:ll.cll2t°,4etilt.(lj.!6:ll.llll:lla43.lllYrki!;4:rr.ras. , 1:1 :1 5 : 42 m ilt 11 : 4' ::: ; f : 0 ,: 4 1 4: r,.. er "; 1• ~ ~, , ,r a ~ nta ( 1 ) 1 1 - 1 :4 1 11 e a 2' re i I:l3lfllCinCkiPtalrik;CdtriCentle' ü b LIIV:IPI'et i°ll.. Ope 4 ''' E.g. i.ife off Woburn, Brcitottishite. w hoct I, vo ."I.SA 4ll( lay last, itt child-tied, Mr*. "„,„1 O fr te ,f , ' tam vi hy IC, DI fl • !loyal Navy, ut 11 11 1 ) ' - 4 0- ~. , ~,,. ,„, On Tuesday morning, at Wi.lth.ittibto. Ef4 • r ,b P 4, Mrs. iVattb, relict of the laic , 1.- , "' SV3 e ltS f l4/.)11 1 0. ThC s4llle evemng, at his houiett„ 7 4 :0 1 to , il " hvg l i . Ebit. I.u:, at St. lunti.otrePt ....—.......... 0 ) - uhA Y eip* r / Cc) A L mAR KET, Es's- . 0 0) Ships at Market'. Slurs telt!. „' oi p j ig 34 Newcastle . . . 2 3k • 4-5' 04. . it Suio.l4nldtal . . 10 • ' 1 14A ruitiv •••••••.--- . ADA Y., ,_ Ar lON StocF, o i , fr los 000di,4 clia 6. s. Ao* t i, o. l ' Exciwq, iii iio. 4l ,, iii Omniten, 4 i 7 0 0 I COO. W Agtn / ~ Rink bunk, 2 49 k 254 Navy ( flei Lent Irit4 s per Cruz. $U s;3+ k 3 ,ei tent. '..du 66A j 3 fit tritt. Cuus. 66 .1 0 I,34iik 1.. .- 1 ,1111. 17 a 3. t6t113 1,11 , 1114.• BIRTHS. Ort Saturday last, te Lady 1 of 0 " Peng, ot S.r. , t i led the next (14. t . At Willionl Shropshire, the ° v Eat'. jun. 01 a Son. V, ~}~ i ,ii l ? i k S,l F