The Sun. — London, England, 1811-07-12 00:00:00

14 -2POlf. COURT OF COMMON. PLEAS, DILI , tr. FUtLER V. 4toNTGONIEItY, DART. ANC) EXECUTOp or VAR !Ant oto'CLUEENOIEURY. VAUGUAN mated this to bt., an ac tion brought by ttic pl 4 intlif, who 13 a' respettable Surik-OIL anti Airwhecoy, residing in Piccadilly., hvoinst Sir James Moittgomei . y, B at.-and the other Executtos of the *late Duke of Queensberry, for prqtesional labour and services - rendered to his t;rdee. Tit,. resent demand, the L•arned Ser-' jeant admitted, was novel in lot nature, ray, it ;night be -aid to be unprecedented ; yet still it could tiot derited that the berviees rendered to the 'de ceased ere ineritoriuus, and for which, no tecotn- in nevi, nut in itself wholly upreasvnable s and die proportioned to Ole ability of the person on whom they were tonterr,ll, could 'be Suppnsed to be ex ces.ive. tLe ycar 11303, the family apothecary. of the NoWe Duke being Superantmatea, the plaintiff was calle.l in to attend on b. Grace during a severe. and pretty tedinns illness writ) which he was thiTh ass:tiled. During mime part 'of this tithe the plain tiff wait obliged t:) sleep io . the house,. and during C.r whole of that period was, on the suggestion of the Noble Duke himself, allowed, besides his other • cl,.arges, an additional sum of iwo guineas per night. Vinin this time the plaintiff continued to be in con , stant attendance off his Grace, visiting him cots sometttnes [bite or four times a day, and, euring alcuust the rchole of the peritid, sleeping at his .Manse all night, snhjett to be called out of bed all times when his GraCe's state of health, or even coevereeney, might seem to reedet that neeessrry.- No allowance,' however, had been Made toehe plaintiff cm this account, for seven ycais and a lialf preceding his Grace's death, although, duriiig ilre latter period of this time, as might be naturally ouppoied, the duties which the plaintiffwas Called on to pet form for Lis Grace were ler from being diorintsbed. The plaintiff,' during this' period, nu doubt, had an:allowance ter medicine and attend ance on his Gi:ice's household, which was, iegularly paid him ; bet this had no concern whatever with. the separate, end infinitely more burtheusome duty, which the plaintiff had to perform, to the Noble, atee himself, in eansetinence of which the plane,: tiff had to relioquieli a coosiderable share of his praenee as a Stir son, and was hequerely obliged, Outing his constant 'tightly fatten lance on his • Grece, to disappoint some of his best employers eird friends, The plan;tiff htici been repeatedly advised,. (Wiwi- the lifetime of the Noble Delie, to give in his =Ono! but sense of delicecy, joined to the de clerittioos node by his 'Grace hunself, in the' pre- sense of the pleintiffoliat he was to be paid,: and that he kaew, lie was entitled to Jae, paid, if not by the Noble Duke, ire. 'least 'by' his executers, pre-, vellitel him. The perticulars .. of the pleitititrs cherge; now given in, coasted of 1700 nights, and 2737 days, each day' comprising hum two to four visits, .charged ate:roiling,. to f - heir lengths, and amountiog in the whole to 10,0001, This Might seem a I,;rge sum when the, citeomstances of the ease Wete ;tot attended to; but, when they were Liken into consideration, when the privatioes.and sacrificer: to which the plaintiff had submitted were luny weighed, when it was .recolleavel that he had greetly caLuinselibed his teasitiess, that he might be . enabled to attend on his Grace, los time being fully occupied pievious to his beink called in to attend on the Duke, ; When, in addition to these circum etanees, 'all of them going to establish a peCuliar claim o,i the Nbbte bake, in favour of the plaintif f , it Was stated that his. Grace had diedposseised of p 1 operty to the amount of one million sterling, it was milk astltics t'O doubt that services of the kind render ed lei person like the; Duke of Cleeettsberly, by a niedteel pee like the plaintiffwere not estimated at the bill tegeent of their iMportance, w hen valued et the Sum put upon them by" the plaintiff. lie was happy to inform his Lordship and the Jury, was not the ease of absolute Contention between the parties. [Noel the real defendants in the cause, who vete' the children of Lord Yarrvinuth, Ike residuary lergats4 LE his Grace beets of age. at the morrieut, ; thi-te was little doubt 'his Lordship or the :fury would flea'hoard nothing of the present agnate. Lord arttwoth had given a certificate under his hole!, that lie esteemed 'the iletreand now made by the plaintiff to be no more thde the plaintiff was entitled to frofit the late Duke Of Queensberry or big myth- Arentativei. In his answer , given into Chancery tbo, by Mr. Douglas, one of the Executor's, to a Bill filed:ite that Court by present plinutiff, there were certain important adrnissions in the plaintiff's fevour e Mr. 'DouglEis there admittecra variety of conversations with the Doke, in which he (Me, a) urged'hiieGrece to make "a euiteble payment' to the naked'', which h 4 uniformly refused to do, stating that he (the pleintitf) . tnig4t be paid by his (the t)tike's) executors. , On ehe pact of the plaietiff time answer by Mr. botiglas, in Chancery, V, as given in evidence. Lord'- Yarmouth Was examined, who thought the claim -of the defendant no more than what he V;as entitled to,. his opinion being e lhat the plain tiff would not have been overpaid, for his attend , nneenti the Doke, by receiving 10001. per annum quarterly' payments, • which, lie eukeired, might be welly equate° the present claim. Ills Lordship elated, that, 'wan occasion .when he was afflicted with art li:ithaTa, • the :Duke of thieensberry sent the plaintiff to him, :front whom lie received great relief. Oct 'another occasion, when he was be et:rely affected with the lame 'complaint, he sent for ttist who did not come to -him as his ~Lordship deleted, ande on his afterwards finding fads with this negteci, and intimating that intiqt employ another, the plaintiff informed him that Lie was preventerifrotri calling on his Lord ship, having been detained alt Bright With Ore Duke ul Chwensberry. In this way lie Was satisfied the . pleintiff had sustained considerable injury ;by his attendeuce on his Grace. Sir H. Halford and Dr: Ainslie were both „exa. mince, .e ho Coocurred in thinking that, cons id er . .leg the ,Reif ith:e ut busineo which the plain, fi, tl . 4 b.ste wade on the Dukc' s vccont, the present Charge WO no MP* than reasownle. Dr. Home, who attended the Duke, steted coeversanon which had taken place Milne plane. tiff. presence, where the Duke expressed his oeieion , F STO(XS _Atilit.Y. 1.14,* Stock s 232'i 233 1 tt ill 4 Bowls, t 2.5. Its. pr. Ntiliy i pet t, el), 93i 931 li ~ ,,,it.i.iiii i., 25. pr. 14. dis. I r.sll S por Cet.t. 93 g .),hiiik..ll, 2 11,6 tIIS. 4 pet tent. 7b i 7,5, g eslipcii,ti i 0:r Ccnt. 3 i,or L'ent s Rck. 62.4 62k Jitto Atilt. i p„,;; Ltitt. Colib. (*lit 2i Cuss, WC t >l)Qtting, 6j i-i i Link L, Anil, ,iii g 11-161114 i PRIC'E'D, AST REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE. itnimatieg to rll6 at 'the smile nine, that he was convinced he expected to be paid for attending on hint, fied th it be know he had a right to be . paid his (the Duke's) Exeeutor,).— Dr. Home also swore; that be sheeld have rete.eived the nuke of Qateetisberry- as:indebted to the plain= Litt 10,0001. for his attend •tice., Mr. Serjeant SifErliEnD, for the defendams, agreed'that this was a cage which, all prohabi. Iffy, might never have come into Court, had it not been that the actual deleedsnts were under age, and that the Executors 61 the Noble Doke,' did not feel themselves entitled to renounce: Their right of objeeling •to the present unprecedented claim - without submitting it to the Consideratioe of a Jury. That the plaintiff in the present case 11:11 reed red meritorious services; the hoe Ddke of Queens-1 berry, the present defendants were far. (rein dis potieg, but, as they had aheady 'evinced, would rather be anxious to avow. They .were called on, however, not to consult their s own incli nations, but to consider .what was fit to be done on the part of the young yersons with hose interests they were entrusted. It was, therefore, his (Mr. Serjeauf Shepherd's) duty, to 'submit to the Jury, whether, as appeared to be the case, the plaintiff, in his proceedings with the Duke, bad aeled on the idea of being remune rated by a voluntary lecompence, in the shape of a legacy ; or, on the other hand, if he had aced throughout for e reasonalde rate of hire ? If the Jury should be - of opinion that the former was 'the case, then could the plaintiff be entitled to recover nothing under the, present action. An apothecary, as such, waa entitled to no tee for his attendance. He might, whenever he was so inclined, present his bill, with a blank, but optional, eburge for attend ance; and his only remedy, if he W 4.. not Rat liked, was not to renew his visits. If, on the other harer, the Jury considered the plaint:lf to have comported himself throughout as a creditor, and no , :s tin ex pedant, then they would find him entitled to a red. sbneble recompense' for its labour, Payment 19 an apothecary by ail one iedHdual, at therate of 10001. per annum, of rather, as it was here cherged, at the rate of !QUO. per annum, was what, he was perSuaded, had neVet y. t emered into the Mind of man to conceive. In his bill of particulars, the plaintiff, who had all ability at making, out an account of this kind, liilll6elf •to be peculiarly expk.rt 'on the subject, by dividiUg 2737 days, being the. hole ritimber which he .(I , lr. Serjeaut Shepherd) could find in seven years and a halt, into 9000 and odd days, or as ha pleased to call them, visits. No Physician even, he was satisfied, co u ld. have expeaed to be patd'et welt a rate. The defendants, however, should be satis fied with whatever the Jury chose to decide. • Sir 'JAMES MANSPIULD, but for the admissions of Mr. Douglas, in his Answer in Chancery, and ter the evidence cif Dr. Home, where, he states -the plaintiff's having been present when the late Duke said that he was convinced he expected, and that lie had a right to expect to be paid tar his visits and for his trouble with the Duke, should have esteem ed, the present action untenable irra Cinut of-J4s was not aware that an apotheeary bad any right to claim for attenlance; far less that tie was entitled to stieftir it. In the peculiar circum stances et,the present case, however, a claim isten ed to have _been recognised, with pertinent remarks on its nature and :extent, he left with the Jury. After retiring for a few minutes,. the Jury re turned ,with a verdid for the plafutifF--Darn es 7,5001. The Committee appointed to inquire into the causes' that retard tho,deciSion of Suits in the 'High Court of Chancery ; Mind who .wr:re instrncted to search the Lords' Journals, ouching all proceedings respeaing Appeals:and Writs. of Error before that House ; and altio to inquire into - all • the Fees and Emoluments taken' by (he Lird High Chalic , ..llor, h; t4 jurisdia - tion of Chancenr, as well as from Comuri , bions of Bankruptcy 3 and were empo..eered to report their observations tfiereupon, toget her wit h the Minutes of. Ole Evidence taken before them, from time to time, to the House :—have-consider the tuatters to them referred, and. agreed upon the following Report : . Your Committee,'with a view to meet the first ohjeet of tl,eir inquiry, viz. " the,Causes that re tard' till decision of Suits in the High Court of Chancerx," thought it advisable, as a step, to ascertain the present arrear . of business in that Court, and before the appellant jgrisdiOon of the Housd of Lords ; for which purpose they called Jacob crofts, - Esq. the Senior Deputy Register, and from his exinination, as well as from the, papa'' which were ordered by.your Ci'mmitiea, and , de.li yered in by him, it !wears that there are I[4 iodl causes now for hearing before the L 0 Chan.. cellor, seven of which were set down previous to Trinity Term 1808, but have stood over from time to time, at the instance of the parties ; and the rest, with the exception of one in Trinity' Term 1808, and four iu Hilary 1 sog, form an Arrear of Causes which have not been c.iiled on, gradually accuthu lining from the last-mentioned Term to gie present It also appears, that there are .in the same paper, thirty-five Appeal , : did tivelle-heatings. The first' Apptai Was set down in Michaelmas 1808, and the 6tst Re•llearing , in Trinity, thoB. . There, are likiiwiitd Exceptions, lli.-murrers, and other matters of that witnie siaildiN in the paper, anibiliving in the w hole t6-titiy-nine, as will be seen in the: Appendix to this report. It is also right to observe, that the number of Petitions to inattets of Bank loptey now remaiumg to be heard by the Lord Chancellor, amounts to yrutil the Evidence, your Committee . learn that t ar.:. before the.MasteP ofthe R9llB 22.6 or igival corn r ti, ti,ilrrten of which were aet .clown previous ru Hilary Term 14310, and tourtcert others were set down lo the course' of the year 1810; but it ap. such causes Ime.been called on, and have str7od over. at. the instance ot the panties.; the rein Under of , he causes standing for herring were hr.t set down in the two tirst Terns of the present year. l'here are, besides, in. his TiOnour's papet, forty tour further DireCtiotiS. COURT OF EXUIiI•QUGR', ICLY THE ATTORNEY•OENRRAL V. CHARLES PAGE. This wag a prosecution instituted by the IS . ()aril of Taxes, and is of general iinportatiee,, ticOlatly as a caw icm to money-lettiters, and as a notice to,bor. reweig, that they are protected in demanding an al lowance and, reimbursement of the :t'roperty Tax, on the payment of interest.. Mr. DAuNer,v, for the , prosecution, stated the ease to . be, this.---The defendant ha% lug lent one Kobcrt Wright, a fanner, Soot. on th e mortgage of his 'Nem; Mr. Wright regularly iiaid him - QOl. for the interest halt yearly, and on claiming to deduct the Profierty TaxOn each half yearly payment, the dclemlaiJ, .on three different ,occasions, refused to allow .the deduction ; and, at length told Wright, if lie persisted in his demand, he, the defendant, b call in the money; Wright finding ,he could get ti o redress,. stated case to the 'Board of 'fazes , who thereupon dire6tecl the present prosecution.--- This was followed by the defendant's calling in the principal money. Mr. Dauncey Stated that the pe nalties, if enforced to the full extent under this pro secution, were treble the`ainoutit of the pnneird • money on each refusal, amounting together to 7uool, But the dtgendant having ()tiered no defence, 411 d by his Counsel admit ied the impropriety of his conduct, a verdict, Wa4 entered tor the Gown ;n the reduced penalty of 4001. THE AVORNEY-GENBRAL V. JOSECII DALES. This tvas an information tiled by the At [coney- General at theinstance of his NI i . Commis sippers for the liflitirs:al I . 2ga:nst the'detett. dant, Joseph Dales, zr broke r , t or the penalty ni incurred by his having, in making a distress ft.,r rent due to .une Henry . Clark Grainger, the land lord, refused to allow Jo..eph Walden, the tenant, the snm of 11.41 v. being the landlord's properlynax, charged on and paid by Walden for two s mall tene ments in Upper Thames-street and Elbow-lane. Mr. DA V NcEV, the Counhel for the Crown, hav• nig proceeded to state the fads 'in upport of the prosecution, the defendant, by.1)19 COLOISeI, Obiay. td, that he was convinced 61 ilk error, and that he hat out any defence to offer in mitigation, except thlt he acted 'under the express dimaion of the ko,lloici, Grainger, by whom he was employed to ot,train the rent, and who is not now to be verdict for the Crown. It tippeared to your Committee, upon searching the Lords Journals, that a Committee of that House was appointed the present: Session, to inquiie.and report what IIIeaSLINS and previsions it any be ex pedient and necessary to adopt and estaash for the more itxpeditious hearing :and decision of causes . brought 11110 that. House by Appeals and Writit Error ; anti in the Report made by that Committee, it is - staled, that 20 Apra!s, and . forty-two Writs of Errol - , ate now d4pigli.Wq; ih the House of Lords. Your Committee also dite6d a statement to be Made out from the Journals of the House of Loids, of the %vitae number 04ppealS' presented and de termined in elicit Session, from tbelear 1751 to the present time; which will be found in the Ap pencli)t, Your Committee also direeled a statement to be tudde out from the Journals of the Honse of Loeds, of the . whole number of Appeals and Writs of Er ror nuw standiug to be hord in that House, and the dates when the same were severally Judged, and the number. of Appeals and Writs'of .Error which hive inward and stand fbr judgment, and how 10n , 4 e.ich has b'esen standing fur judgment which will alio be found in the Appendix. kin pursuance of their instruaions, your Commit tee alsp.pr,oceeded to exlimine into all the Fees and Emoluments taken by the Lord High ctiancellor, in his jurisdiction of Chancellor, as well as (tom Commissions of Banicroptcy'i and the evidence of Mr. Pens:lm shetvs the annual amount of the emoluments of the last nine years exclusive of thns; which arise to the Lord Chancellor in his ca pacity as ,Spea,ker of die HouseOf Lords. it will be lonnd,.that-, From 14 April iSoi to s April 1302. ,C 9,926 12 7 Fro it 5 April IkO2 to - 5 April 12 3 . . . t0,u1 . 3 j From s April 1803 to 5 April 1804 10,447 5 6 From 5 April 18 4to s April 1805 . . . 4 ).449 6 4 From 5 April 18e5 to 5 April Itto • • 9,39 0 9 7 from l April 1807 to 5 April 1.808 „ . ty,690 17 I 1 t rout 44A pril 1838 tos April iS.:•9 . . . 10,935 2 6 From 5 April 13.9 to 54.11)1111313 . . 12,1 , 6 to From 5 April iSio toss April ISI t . . 15,532 1j o The examination of John Woodcock, Lig. Se cietary of li:inkripts, and of other uitiiesses, in it great measure aficertain the diffelent ,sources• front which th e emoluments of the office atv. de- A comriderable part of the emoluMents of the of fiee rif Lord. Chancellor is,.and, es youripommitte.e understand, ha, been far a very long course of years, derived ham lees nominally paid to the Se. cretary of Bankrupts, but who 9CCOODIS for .such tees to the - Lord Chancellor himself, and is alio Aitti by the Lord , Chancellor a certain fixed salary in lieu of such nominal tees. Your Committee cannot see this without observing, that it appears to them highly inexpedient that the emoluments of any ju dicial Officer should be constituted in part of fees nut ostensibly payable sta himself, but to an interior Officer; At more than the proper fees should be alleged to have been taken by tho Ministerial Otli cer, the complaint must be made . to firs superior, the Judge of the Court, who would in that case have to sit judgment upon sti:..h alleged al3uses, from which, if they existed, he would himself derive benefit. If it shouhl be Thought that any alterations. Might be made in this respect; and if the salary prat other emoluments of the Lord Chancellor, excin- SICC at such tees, should be deemed insufficient for the office, your COMMilith! 'would suggest the pro priety of increasing the salary, and abolishing alto gether the tees in question, which, thought 40 eY clu nut appear to be of great amount in each Comm* Plinted by IL kLH.tkkiS.atNo.4,Marellitt.cowt, Bow.gtfget i anti PebFihrii by WILLI AM A R E Seki , P PS, Sonth Malt' At Ind S L'N Um.VICY, No. 11 V, Strand, *bum ildvetistrarnts, Orders for Vat) Pap r, f or the lzdi ter , (po l o:m*1), tut `IP ....wwir-r-r-vm,-ut-x.--orr3r-1it..... •--.-, , ic a., upoii distress nil trisolverfdy. -. ~ 1 Henry.eow per, E-it. ‘,i 'as also CX3lllilleG OA WA' m(iunt 01 tlic rtes reciiveA,tfie Low figit Cli ce:loi in hislicOkii,of SpealQr of fte tioqe of torils, t root) Kt st, , i 0,, commencing !Lit:nary, Nol, to the S-- 'ion ceinincl:Cill,,,, J'allUdly, tki.U.italone, as frillos ,Lt . .- ..-'. ' • - scssiutts bygiunirig 'jailor', ISa I ,Cs.gir as. i, , , t ,:t0! . .4.1 IS,•1 • 4.7 1 4 s'. Novel:lnv isoz ~ 5 .139 , 14.4. • ' Ntoicatbct tao 3 :a i .34 1.5 , Pllll,O • iSos r. 4 ,0 0. 1.-I,.ii;:ry • ( Soo • 4,03 tit, tt, l',e,,citin er itiob • 2,4 ii . .. , li.••-•.•:. iso7 , 2,9:7 as. I''illiary 184' 3 • 4, ) 0 • Innuary ihn9 . 6,4;6 i 06., ',limitary ililo 9.'64 :O. i Your Cottimittee, litiviiig thus, in the Kist peer uscet taint. d what the arrear oi business it; Br i i , present Mile ill the - House of LOT(IS iiS a' C,‘ oft t‘r A, IVA, mid, ii ihe Court of C: to were (!e' strops to proceed witll their iciluirr as 10 fhetail,4 which hai,e retarded tile deusiort of styli i" l! 4 CoOrl Of Cheixery, aN d to aiccitain A tittir tile Will was or such a nature as required a lenT°l3l7 /4 a Perrrptient 'remedy : at,d'also- to coi.sider itie e)..' PedieneY of such remedies is' have been or 0). to 'suggested. . . Your Committee called for 'a Variety of 4)0 0 : tion ,ate tkie Very' iioportara objetts; bu't the" ti , u that the time which trust necessarily be 4' 61 , 1 ''' preparing and laying that information b e fore IfieT , l will make it impoisi hie tur them to s atisfy 10 6 ' ('''', jects Of their appointment vt-ry speedily, or Pei l .7; within the period during which it is likely flv: 0 1 : 0 present. Session of Parliament may last ; and , ~ • i geese circumstances, your Committee bave tholii: litnurc.:ighlit i f oibteriliknegiaiirlytepeurti4eywitliciat delay, ae:L o , plet e .; and to report Lk evidlojanvceehwelitli:lbitchleayt;' taker. tune IS, SEit. OwavolLM*l now.axart. .......... ......... , i I Of MyfiTERIOUS DEATH. --00 ;Nlooday se ntlit;'''' lo:l Cargo, near Carlisle, an toquest was Iteht 0011. body of a man, apparewly het Ween 60 and 7°,)‘J'ij QI a spare ,and Meagre appearatiC e, wiio.lo t.:4, f 09,( i d dead about 7 in the evening; i n ,re c Qr s t ,,',,C . adjoining the high rOad, an d not nee l' h.l. , yaids distant 'fronv Cargo Bill, There tidig l'''' . o salute evidence before thii Jury aS 10 the itio °l o ,l whkh the deo-aged came b y , his destltil 6eactr, %%tuba of Ibm rid . Dead , was daitt, tea.: • 1 1 1 ,„ od cluitistatices (tits "ding ehis editl as det)ild leery , g Jury, and tAllicti 'lava. been since dev‘loPl'i,c'e, exceedingly roystetious. It .ttpprtnetl, in t' h i ` r o ,,t 11:surt'V'-e`l).)°'''fj t"iit one of the itiliali,tants of the 13 3 0 ',"r,',,ltir the body lying-stietched (it iti a ititeorvn °;1 -opt rportting,' and a holy grazing or the te,„o road, unencumbered. by US saddle, StiPPL.7O, than tnerely asleep no notice was taloa 'l ': s r 00111W:ice, tititil , the ev color; , w I,eo 11 14 ° I t fi lu 0 , rat' at)ce, wai oh..ervecl. ,Ala'riti being tOttill'li,io,4 riled, it was discovered that heel was deJd• ,e,lif lying. upon his baLk—all lii.• o ili +i, el ii . %,:l very thirt, were stripped off, lying o boe aI L , lz 0 , the saddle,p/ace4:l bp,ott I' is le,;s. At 11'5,';,i-;Os 145. in a purse in 811ver. .2.1, in cod', e r ' 3 ,' le e l # rosary, 6:e. - At .sorne Lute di!:11'0:1100,1,1or c , e ivi 4 quitlit,ity of blood, 'which li;;LI eo l ' ',., le' o odekl iron) the deceased ; it is eeci,sl,-er mark,. that though ricivii,iblo Inarki! 0 1 v ,, 1 ii ° geared on the body sutliciont to aciovfr.ooo' causo of his death, he (night hate tlf: i v rO l i the bursting Of a blood" v esso , och.e bt , - 11 tt ., ) , ; 01 suifucated, It Was also given in e,ideli4'' 1 pr ii,l 4 untortunate ,ireature wa; aecompantettfrPcei,illo by,,a person on foot of suspicions appeuP f 4 constantly kept a little before the ofb'loo,l3 were last seen near each other in to tieig,.l 0 peisl of Cargo, about eleven o'clock )a, "" lo ve answering . hiS description, rno, h ogol i e, of it! tlie , furry' at It ockliti, About tvovt% o.,‘`: 001' same flight. It is not untkorthy of 111,4.311. r?, gate of the field, in which ibe deeess . ,l 'i t o re , was strongly fastened on the suiside tot' ► 0 1 0 0 4 The body was after wards recOgiii zed Di ail jtl , ol who happened to travelling to t ,`l4Y'fieft.;) of ~ had had some little be, acquaintance of I),„'lto,iftioo,-g; to be nn Irishman, from the tleiV ifesaf'L Newry, a jobbvr it) cattle, arid a no ° b a o tile 'y'l,6l' liabits--ii .being his general cost::::.„ „ oi n t iS i t t i : ,ll t her Permitted, to sleep in the open 3tr s • , Vill' lr . , aa be.ell I I i „i s4ef ter or .same hay stack. be 1) ,d 53 il u . haven ydsterthy week, where in gold in payment of cattle, ao' l vi r i , i , ll , c , ' e j ti 10}:';.. posed were in his possession when I ' ls ir . ely ' l ' ''. Carlisle. li,s nattie could not b e, °III' 4'l)' of th e i' cl. ' d tainevt; from the communication . . i . or eo v , e luded to, it is either l'erail, 50010 : Inlaid of similar Sound. 11.1 " ' ill ' tie ia4,),11 decently interred on Tuestl3y ec oillgt ; t ie j 4 0 w 0 trot `w i l l! 01 ,01 Mg iliound of StilDWl),••,* no will b,.! ..e, not rest here, but that soch itiej- ~,, occorei.‘ may tend Co the developernent vl t' ''' ,/ pft.lo4 , /././,': 4 ... • ow I oilso , c t :. 1 0' ()n the Eth in tat W00,11)491)1 0 , . , sp i countess Fainiuutli, ot a Soli. I;itintoirgli, i son , 17 4 The sante ay, ot otk.plak.e, of .ova, a i a tt, lames I(ayniond jr.''o4Lcot ti> l 4. ~.,..04 1, itzt team c hild, ".. in Alherno7, i On 1 uc,atly ia,t, at hit 1,0..- J.:),1. pf 3 Y.L:olpi., LA'" Lady of Ciimies Vtinicitin,',. joA•01 want 0 1 ' 4 .,,i On Wedues,lty I..sr, 1440 ',Y,,,ti efi tcr. t he lol ui lohn.stf a,. Haiti .r,1•; w, of 4 :,,otoci.pikrt ~ jor i Vzsterd iy, at hi+ no w 14 1 av , . ,a , folin 11 Wlllialn Gosliog, Lski. ot ISUll',e, tic LOY v . ' , The 5.1111 c day, so o ...Mora. pia. Ilog.tr:lt, Es q . tit a `loo• ' --41 tr ,4 -------- ;11,0 glt 4 ' 1 e s,lr I , 11WIll'It I. toe IL.:',,tet!ty),ciLobo,l*(ri, C 100001). ta Ear, of iviillro‘csr_;7ol4):...eiilob,erit..4;\;,l,ol:l,;:3Ad° c, r ut ,41 1 , 6 : i i ,, , .' tiratlnr . _ yP4,,, East- India Coinihiny'S -LAI" , moo Strouk 1 ,, kr.ot . Viscount Me.vilies soir-io law ..1 . 1.4,11p.k.,,i0.. jt, ''' ' 4 ,Otto, a; 64 Sir Thoiti3 511411 e, .....44. , .. 001., 4' •-• of Mr. 1 - 1 4, 1, ( 1' ZUlleil iiAfgtaVe, illti.‘,. ar ,,,,40 14,, F 14 aril. I , 1 41. 00010 rOlir . ~, tart Mon at IValcot . , LA , vio,Au•ji .36 Belfast, Inlay, Lo' I,lllC,,d,ioi4;al° . ..,,,, o 14-0,10,, , galll;ll°Jl.l;iot6ilC:l°Sit:Plitt;k:b4i'lStql.le2.del sfi,V4.:lAl':::f Ur 1 . 11 :e 4 eti.litall-grecii, lir Mary Anor " , ~,, ir. i i., ~,i, i . tirst, of Inc above p,tc-d. ~. tvhitechor 0001;,,otri. Lately, at Si. . Mar) ii . 1it!!:.4,1,te,t sok,tv ipio_lo , 14 0, Solicitor, of Ltu.l,l,yj to li,, !.1,;co0 1410, ksri iialtl;ert of I , " i't`:,.."ol tilt% 109 of Mount -place, only daait, Cooper. t• sq. ............e.........,....re. , 4 • 141,;110114 oilio? ' U 11)• 11 ' ()." ari‘fi,orc. I:3rStiluonild4l:o,yiNviiaiSt,itid; jui g ii it jiolllllitiCeit.urratoisey'.7ll.ll.ga:cinri;:ei::.ttf:lool;t:ll;illl:o;ll::.:o, t)11 Tl,lobday,.“ JO' lid,i,e\i'l,_l,lciq4t,i, It I taill Viiiiii.l fir_riiii)s.l.:,:v ' .-•-• , m.strlut, C;ro•vrnor 11:.14 utldroscd.