The Sun. — London, England, 1811-01-19 00:00:00

1 L ~•., ~':~ ,„ „ Right Hon. Secretary observed, for him to state the gr o unds o f his objeetion. It was ctrtainly very na tural that her M 9 s , y should' wish to have the ad vice of those next in• blood to her b u t it etas 00 _ , neces.ary that they should be on the Council, for her Majesty w.‘a in the daily habit of seeing them, , and tp , eht enosretienily receive any advice out of the : Council which they wile inclined tri - give: In the fir , 4 piece, it was attploper that the Duke of Yolk should be on the Conned,. because he had a strong Cotistitivional objectien that any of the Royal Fa. , mily should hold an tbce of trust or responsibility, , unless strong and valid rcasons were odctuceCl to the House tor it. WoUld any wan denY that eircuM. stap , .es might occur In Which a Meinht-r of the Council of the Royal yomily might be called upon for advice in which his own interest was concerned. That was a strong reason for the ohjetiti4t. It was desirable that ON Ceuncil should be comppsed of Persons ready to give the most impaitial, and unbi. adetce. And was not the Duke of York ad mitted to have a most affeetionate and dutiful regard for his Royal Father,? Had it not been already de. tided that the , Regent was the Most tmproper per,on to have the cite of the King's Person ?'dull oojec . tion was upon Parliamentary groun.ls-&-theobjection equally applied to the Duke of York or any of the branches at the Royal .14a1;itly entitled to the succes, siOn to the. Throne, The Right Hon. Secretary stated, that a similar mo:ion bad been made in 178 d, anti rejected. . • Mr. Puestesav4lid not think that,the Right Hon. Gentleman was correct in the last statement he had made) Ite did'oot think that any Committee would have rejected a proposition similar to the one made by the Noble Lord. The Right Hottobrahle 'Gen tleman had stated~ that it was objectionable' to ap point ant of the Rol al Fiunily to r offices of trust or responsibility he (Mr. Pousonby), however,'cduld new li n go that this ,acne Royal pet son held an office of great trust, and responsibility, and yet the li gut Hon. Gentlermat at that tithe raised no sort et oh. jection; on constitutional or otbertrounds. With • respect to`the objection owaccount of the affeetiott. ate regard and duty of the. Royal Duke to his Ma jesty, whyliislilajesty niusi inderti be in a very un fortunate situation, and ditierent train all other la ' thers,' if the etra,tionate 'attentions and re6ards of his children were to operate as hats' to seclude them from the cartrot his'Royal Person. It the advice of • stny . or the Royal Family might be obtained by her • ,Lvi ajt ,,, ty , w i t ho u t their being nppointed.on the Coup e 1, she would have it where it could tie of no effeet or consequence, He fthiered himsdt the Com . mittee wonid nit see ary just ,grounds for eitcloding the Royal Puke; on 'die contrary, be thought it woold be most proper and 'politic to - have all his rvlejesty's aOll4 (..viith , the eiceptiati'bf the Regent) on the Council, as' atfrrding to the eyes of burope a pr 6 o f udaniniit," betw4en then) and the To • rejeilt • the motion would. be d.,ing little less than holding them of as defita•nt in those , virtues ..which the nation knew 'they pos. aes , ed. • ' . . '• Mr. Sectettiry Lianas( denied that he had itald that it w.is not desiroble to . nave any of the fioyal in ota‘'et of-trmt or responsibilh y grattniottily. When Persoti; the obj.!ct of the'mution, Wa• in power,•he had DUI IUI DOI tur to Dear ths nurnble tes timony to lie admirable qualitiei antl.estien dustry tit he Commander in Chief. 'He 'had from .o,lit.try quarters gained the kno.4ledge of the i 'ty had erne conduct of his itoyal . Htglines3, and tot the! tc•spet which'ille army entertained of him,. He hardly expected such an attack (thin the Right Hon. Uentleman. ,Mr. C. WYNNE conceived the objection now urrd,'ctitild not apply . to the Duke, at fork. Eire Motion . was then put and negatived. _ e . The. CHANCELLOR of the Ettott aaura then pro. .posed. to ;fill up the fir,t blank with the h om e of Charles Manners, Archbisbep of Canterbury," Mr. SHERIHAN objected to the introduction of the first narno. Notwithstanding tiff that the Right Hon. -Gentleman had before described of the ,struc ture .ut the precedent et • 17138 (of whiCh he was so fond), being, all that human wi‘dorn could de- Vise, he did !not Imagine That the Right Honour. able Gentleman could have ventured to carry his attachment so far, as to propose the insertion of names rather than by official sttaatious. 'Pie Right Honourable Gentleman had now, it seems, ' chew covered that in addition to ,the clerical errors in this :fimous Bill, it was not that grand structure which his imagination had fancily. pictured—there' was some mere tionsenSe in it. Among other defects, it was dist:oveted that 'there was no Meta her of Parliament in thp Council, and in order •to remedy that deiect, .the Rigtrr Hononrable Gen- Atleman propoied his Honour the Master of the. Rolls, wishing,. no doubt, to have a superabun dance of law in the Coititcds of her 'Ma. j-st 7. "Without meaning to speak in terms of dig. , respea of the Master of the Rolls, Whom all Must allow was a person of the' niost'dxaited charader, he must be allowed to say, that in his' opinion, there was too much, of law in the Councils of her Majesty, and it could- not be denied that law was an ingredient the least . necessary 'ihere. It would have been more :respeCtful to the House of CORl mons, if 64. Right Hon. Gel.tietnan had nimed the Speaker of thd Moose to rid the Chasid,' .' Look ing to the precedent of 178 H, he tnu say that the. whole of that proeecding was applicable persons oriel not plinciplim, and consequently highly 6b-. jettionahle. He would not speak' with &sieved of the memory of Mr. Pio, bin he tilut. dticlare 'that versOns were the obii}Cts of that:Minister irti appointing his I'd,tjesty'S Cowicils, and not Theru was this monstrowi absurdity in the tittl of f 778, that the King's ricovery might be announced or not. He could trot avoid noticing the; rapturous applause With which the tientlenien behind the Right Hon. Gentleman cheered the le ,. cornaiendat ion 'which that Right . Gentletnan : gave himself, in order to' fill the Nike 11t ggent. with the idea that he was the best Minister he tfutild have. He could not help admiring he very hand some charaCterlor honesty, abiliry, and fidelity whist) he said he was entitled to front setting, his Royal and he could not atoid, in consequence, v,rig, th thcr ambition of the Right, Hon. ,inan was to'rtuolain in the service tit his Rival Take tuo" said that 'Right pon. Gentleman, " I am the Attest person to manage voar sitlairs ; selel me as )our Mi:.:l,ter."....(Hitr, hear !) • 'l'li.. cheeting,lhetutor, .. was not extra - indinaty, consideri g cliai , Ole It!ghi Hon. Gentle -111 man bad maile sot isk a I I , 4.."(... , (1...,111,a canvas. He t7t. t uld bring, lii ~i-t-ga. Geatleng.in to the iat of' his sineerity.ofaitachntent to the Prince. -WOu id the Right Hon. Gentleman agree to the motion ha: should conclude with, and in:ileac' of names, insect the iitles'ot the (A - lit:es?, it he could not consent, then be must declare Illat the Right Non.. Giittle== man was casting the- most foul and unmerited re proach and stispicion t oit the Prince. Was the Prince so profligate as not to J A I trusted ? 1)itl. the Right Hon. Gentleman suprie, that to case any - of these great personx, vi=i,. .the AreltWoops, or the Chan. cellnr, or Ciiit.t Judge of the IS,.ttiti, should die, that his Royal Higliness M Milli appnint successors not of. the most distinguiAted.onaracters in point of talent and :virtues.: The Right Honbuiable,Gvn tlernan . concluded Awitli moving, to leak.e out i-t ili 'lame of " charleOlanners.". It then wash to taild,, " the Archbistiop'of Canterhury tpr the time being." l'he CHANcettott of the Excucautta trusted he shoOld be sOccessfnl in repelling the, accusatiot of treating his Royal Highness with diSrvape4.l, !and of making use of the precedent of 1788 . for conve nient purposes. He had'alwaysexplesltd a general , strong, opinion in favuor of tlim precedent, but never to foll,w it up with servile and degrading The Right Gentleman, on termer occaSions, 'gkien loo'high a colouring to the coupluct which he (Mr. P.) had pursued. The iirinciple upon „which Parliament had proceeded, Wal first,- that the Prince Regent was 'not the proper person.to be entrusted wnh the Guardianship of the King, nor, that in the second, the person wit.) ought to.be on the Council of 'her Majesty.- That 'was the first step on the principl.l ; therefore he s,lioitld feel dirt) cif jultilicd, on Parliameniary. grounds, in piOccedin g , with the next step, which was to negative ti,e pro pcisition, withou', in so &Mg, implying any sort, disrespect or distrust of his Royal Highness, whose conduct throughout the early stages of the business . ' was such as in call forth unfeigned respect and .ad rniratinn. His Royal Higltims' had acted 0. ii h reserve. Which appekue.i extremely creditable, and highly commenuahle—that was .justly his due.— When the Right Han. Gentleman talked of niis. oust and disrespect, ho did nut do him (Mt. P.) justice, • Mr. SitEutbAN ntAtintained, that the effea would be, as he had before stated, throwing a foul stigma. on the Regent. • Mr. WilirattE4D . contended, that the Statute Book would record the stigma. Tnat suspicions, it was clear, du excit, and oillst remain, Ilnitba the Right"HOn. Gentiemv conseoted to adopt the mfi don of Ins Right , klon. Friend. Mr.,A oast dectared, that in his opinion the idea wouleb. conveyed to the - world, tnat his ,Royal Highness would use unooper pleaus, ihrtd• for — e w.ia iliAt to be trusted. The question .wasi whether the' country should have the secuniy,of a good and ex. cilctit Council, nr have the certainty,ol a job ? For alio apointment of o ffi c i a l „,„, e4 would.givetti4t security against tho L nesent,,prripost, •10.. Mr. HERBERT and Mr. JOHNSTONE supported the oiginal motion 'of the Chancellior ot the Ex; , chequer. Mr. Alms re-urged his former arguments, and cortetuded that it was iiidtcurous to suppose- the Regent would appoint persons to fill those high Situa tions unworhil;s Mr. MAitItYATT supported the ori g inal motion, on the groundsstated by the Movet-. 2 lhat it had been cLemeiriiiexpedient to plice the guardianship of the Sovereign in the Regent y that , this was a contingency on that api Ointment, :Ind constqueutty must be sup port.idin tne same way. Sir S. Itosin,LY otiserved, that , tlie .Gentleman 'opposite seentedito suppose that the Regent in the event of any of the four greatotlices mentioned in the clause becoming Vacant, would, in tilling them„up, oVerlook all the great qualities which were. necessary in 'the individuals lobe appointed io them, and would consider only whether those individuals %void(' be subservient to his wishes in her Majesty's Council. If his Right Hon. Friend pergisted in following pr ceilents, let him follow the precedents of the 24th of George 11. and the, filth of George 'III. and ,Opt the inchoate precedent .of 3789. In the two for mer cases, the Members of the Council of Regency were appointed,not by natne but . by oilice. He ‘.as sure that i t was not the inteution'ochis Right Hon. Friend to insult the Prince ut, Wales ; but it was tho Interest of all to take :are that his Royal 'High ebruniier should be supponecl. if the clause should pass, as it originally atewd, the public wouid suppose that , the Legislature si3ipeztect his Royal Highness of being capable of raising In individual to the 'rank of an .ArchbiShop, ur Lord Chief , Jus mice of the Kingl Bench, nut because lie was eini nciii,for,hiS Piety and his learning, but becatise he was ,cdprible of, prostituting himself to the most scandalous purposes. He repeated his reitommend anon to the Right Honuurabte Friend to be guided 14 the spirit of the precedent which he had des cribed. ATTOlt$ "Y -G t+l i c ti At could not refrain with out aisclaituiug on_ tiffs own part the calumny, that it was intended to do any thing disrespeatul by his Royal'Higline - 4, the Prince of ‘Vales. It was possible that any man„ who deliberately considered the provtisions of the Bill could be of that opinion. priticiphi on wl!teli the present clause proceeded Wll3 I w.lotitAt on the original principle, and admitted by 401, t !Lit the Regent ought not-to be the guardian of the Ring's person. It necessatily followed as an extension of that principle, that the &gent ought nut to apitti.tit those who were to he the guardians of the Th s prepesitton did net arise Item the siight'est distrust of his' Royal Highness perwtially, but from the principle that 110 liogent shook! eviti pd,sesi such a power. As to the piece dents adducvd by his Hun. and Learned Eriirtid, they were not at all- applicable in the present in ,. stain:o, - 1(A those precedents referred to i..:ounctis at gegent.y,, who were invested with poi.ticai powers, and who had nothing watever to do with 1110 care et the Royal Peson. Atter a shoit explinatice by Sir S.'ilomiLuf !Le Amendment ins negativedovittiont a division, ni were also similar Amendments propoied by 114 r. `,Sheridan, reanetrttriZ. the ot rref tuber Ut titer rla je,ty's Council, tut the nathe.l, is they ot3ginally stood in the propo4iiion of the . Chancellio of the Exchequer weie inseued into the several-liittitks of the clause. Mr. SHERIDAN observed, that the clause direaed that the Council' should meet in the Ist week'-of April, and then only , once in three months, except at the 'discretion of her Majesty. In'anot her clause, however, the power was vested in them of examin ing the Physicians as to the state of 'his Majesty's health. It appewred to liiin to be A great oversight that the Council should not have the power vested in themselves to meet H hen necessary. The CNANCELLOR of the Esc:tit:hut:in hid elm= ceiVed that the context ut the other c la uses ga ve to 'the Council that power. However; it it were not 'so, the error ought to be correlled. An Amendment was accordingly introduced be Clanse giving the Council the power of asiemb.ing ,tit6ntielves. . A long conversmion, which followed °tube mode in which the Queen shotild affix her Sign and he mode by .which the Prince should affix his Si r ` p Manual, was re-discussv'd. We were unable accurately to co46l,the remit. Mr. OHERIDAN remiirkeci, that all hough her Ma. jesty.liad the power of filling up ctrtai:: efE'es that might b7..egiop vacant, the Bill did pot render thought th at on her to fill th em up. H e thout that this should be obViated ; .hut a: the clause hid been passed in which this pi - Oita:hl was tnade,•he would propose an Amendment on ge Report. On the Chairinan's reading the first of the clauses 'which provide -tor the resumption of the Royal au :hot ity by his Majesty, I..rd MtcroN test it his duty to:state his objec. lions .to the propoied mode. .1-lo,iteVcr ungracteus Witch an assertino might be considered., he deciared, that in hisopinion, a more solemn mode of deter mining his, iVlajeitty's restoration to health, and one more public, and more -satifactory ctie, country; ought to be adopted: It it were necekiry that his Ma jesty's illness shoulrl•betsubstmtiated .in the most so-. lento manner before the Measure now in progress was instituted, he lioogh t it equally necessary that his Ma jesty's recovery should be substantiated in as soletim a manner before the operation oftlierneo.sure should deterinine. By the Bill; it .appeased. to him, that ; iis Majesty was put completely into the . hands of her' Majesty and the C ou ncil, and howeVertinbatioded the confidence . vildch be entertain in, there persons., he thought that the tranquility i t the lsub lit:.mind required I hat they should vested with such extenst% e poweti. By the., three, clauses of the Bill, it was impossible that Majesty could re sume the royal authority noti.. the yestoration of ibis 'health ivas certified by the Queen and Council.to to the Privy Council. His Majesty vvas . then rised under Roi.al Sign Manu,ll,,to call together a portion (chose() by ht,uselt ) of the . Privy Cot:th ell, :for the purpose ascertaining whether or not the recovery was complete. ,He. objected, first, to the power given to the Queen and Council , and thou to the provision that .his Majesty stiouldetirrotutin only a part of the Prk.y . Gained. To the whole of thi: complicated machmeity he had u great. and he thought that the tiltim.fte investigation by which the complete recover, of his Majesty: Wail to - be ascertained, had.' better take.place in Parlia ment. Mib FIJI:LER did not know what the Noble Lord meant by Machinery. What would the Noble Lood have dung?' What'did he wish ? bia not the i~.li go on all its stages, iccording to tile rule by which it had been so accurately and nicely debated ore a former occasion ? If the Bill was founded on the precedent established by one 01 the wisest men tlint ever lived, 'why not keep it regtilitecl.hy his under standing, and by his comprehetiSive mind ? should, perliapp, have thought with the. Noble LOrd that an examination of 'tiid Physicians.by would be better ..than att examination them , by the Privy Council, were it' not that in .the, latter case they .could be examined on oath, which in the fortner . they would not. It might be said that by this-observation he imputed to those Gentlemen a disposition, to say, that to which they - would not swear. 17ar fr om'. it ; but in this case the . House ought to•be gOVerned by philoso phical principles (A low: lough). Gentlemen might laugh at that, but those were the principies on which the measure proceeded. lt 'was a philosphical principle which restrained the -House from appoint ing the Heir Apparent to theC:6)min airthe guardian of the King's person, and which induced them to prefer the appoirittnent of persons who could not be unduly influenced.. • The CHANcetoott of the EXCEIEgURR, in reply to the Noble Lord opposite, observed, that the Noble Lard seemed to think that bcceuse the present mea sure originated 41 a Parliamentary Inquiry, the Re gency ,ought. not to be suspended but on a Parlia mentary' Inquiry. but 'there is a considerable differ enc‘e in the twd cases. Thht which 'Was easy in the one would be.dir m licult in the ot h er . The Comit tee must recolleet this important distinetion, namely, that the measure proposed to the two Houses 'of Pat !tauten!, was to divest his Majesty, .for a tithe, of the whole of the Rdyal Authority. It was impos sible t h at they could consent to this, without ascer certaihing in the most complete mariner, that the case was one , which authorised •their interference.- But witty withregard to the resumption, his Majesty was entitled to'resurne.the Royal Authority the moineot that his health was re-established, It was his intett tentiont'however, to propose an athendment to the clause, which, in his opinioe, was -defective, inas much as it did not contain any proyision, authorising hit Majesty to interpose lilinself on the subjed, and to institute an inquiry into the state of his health.— By the clause, the Queen had the •pidwer of astern bling.the Coimcil=---by the Atn'ettdineut introduced by the suggestion of the Right Hon. Gentleman op posite, the Comic& had the laower •of a,sernbling themselves--to these proviiions 'he thotiliht ought to 'be added,. one by which the Council should be di rooted to assemble on the requisition of his Majesty. He` stated. this on principle, atid'nOt from the slight est doubt of the readiness of her Majesty to assemble the Council, or of the readiness of the Couuctl us r< „ . assemble b s l u e o t i h a n m proceeding.set ves, should his intention by this Amendment, to give hii ; jesty the means of getting rid of the RegencY in .p ri other way, than by an investigation by Ibe'` o Council ; but poly to enable his Mojei:Ay hinl' 6 :ll , put in motion that investieation. With eel the the resumption heiffe foutided on a Parlionieoil Norh ap w p a il s y i Ir by () c a c a n y ie; Inquiry,. such. proeisiou would- be attended f a . ,, great inconvestiencies. ,-11 Parlitirnent were 14_1 sembled, they Inti.t. be cal ledloget her.- 4 ,0„0.r; time must intervene before they could Ill et : n iet allimiled, that in point of form, Parliam ent, 1' fr rogned,tnight-be.summunned in 14 days on 'P of o , Mg emergency ; bet would 14. days sUltiee ' l , u ,, o bi. seinl:tling' such a Parliament as would s atisfy " ti t, circumstances of the Noble Lord "(' _The. Bill pruvided ths i , ‘l , circumstances of the resumption ot the 1 . 1 T 11 „.4. thorny sholdd h I i it ,-e senun.tte... to P.aliatneln, 0,111)4 ately after the resumption had taken place. L' l s se anxiously to tliat subject, as to provide that' 1* event of a dissolution having taken place hc l),,io resumption, - the Ministers of the (I - 6 , ol' l e° e l Meta oiliould 'immediately itteet,' . for the Vt l q . t b taking into consideration the 'circuinstnnc es ! resumptiou, •He meant to fill UP the blank rOvit leg the ntinthcr of the Queen's Council, bY li . „ 1 . 4 opinion, in coincidence with their own, her ',`' ) j . . t should be authorised,to notify to the PovY (1 4 , 1 ti• that his Majesty was . , restored to luch a... ,,.0i,i • health as to be 'capable of re-urning flei Pe rs ' s . i . , , e.' i i ercise of the Royal atithni it) , with tee werll ' lo i , t ; And he propo.,ed • to. introduce. as an Arec t1 ., 4 0... i word's to the' following effect; ” That her l‘l'l )lt . C.ounci; should assemble in the presence of lie' 0 .rtilYto , on his , Majesty's Royal will an d pleaor e ? Mg signified for.that porpas,:.” th e 01111 Mr. FULLER repeated his ohjeßions ito j e, machinery.,". used by tlx . Noble !Jed, a t) ,„f • clared that he w ou ld not l en d his haod to " I ;1 0 •:11 chinery whatever. Efts idea was, bat the 1 0 4 ' were to appoint a Regent, Lind that a Rego' "rtotts„., a King ; and he conte n d e d that the prec ed ' n ; f o l ''' 11evolution I)•.id:bn Sari .tly followed 10 I I : e ' t or!' eons i oi, r wi,, i licruln li .gi t smpi a irc,i l o l i t ' er, 1, c r a.l 8, y : ' t I at precedents-which IShl result l e fo l t h i tl i u r i t ii t i l l ! i l l,ia l iii i t) l ' c.a o k l t ( ) T i e r . a e u fv l e ip l i e ls r : l6t n ' i u t i l 'e e i o r t a , ,, ) ili, t t , ' , 1 V % ,: ; , i i ' r ll ci ' , I ti l i : e ii : allowed to ben very accurate and sensibii.;t", ,*'. on a, recent occasion heaped together like strn'P 'red herriegs at the door of an oil shop. it t ft'', ' Mr.• Moe RIS contended that the judgment ° e? Howies,4.p.eiliatnnet ought, to ; be,,the s( '',",`: t ie.f. on wjlicli his M., jesiy s h o o& resume the j'' ,l ol authority. In point of utility and prort' le , its that *a Parliamentar y invellOP l 'l li aW the resumption of the Royal authority by ''' ti t. 4.,, . jesty., could be justly compared to the Pat - lil t p i . investigation before . that . resumption. ilegi',ultiii, object to the proceeding originating id th e 1 ' 1 .1..0... His objection was to ,the subsequent tung:',.., ; ; l l; • , he maintaitied • that the tWO 'Houses of xb'', i ,: . it et 1,.. to exercise the same discretion on the rcioi"P j ,), , , 'he Royal authority as they had dune tUi I tle 't ' ':l 4 '' ~ • sin"•°l it. 'He admitted that a Parltaulen t6/I b , :tts ,i I '' ligation might occasion some• little dc l3 Y ) 0 : was persuaded that the incdnventenN `',:;o, much,mare item counterbalanced ,by,ibu as ;lid': man in the c.4mtry. that his MijestY \v' aka` restored to perfect health. Such . il 01°. i1P„, , eeedirmg would also.; . he was con 'need, bel7 l 4o'; geoiai to, his Majesty's own feelings. ll °, ; 4 1'0° , lactic) be ascertained in•the Privy Coun..l l " . 41 10,c claration of his Maje'sty 'c'O;.ilci not be'cb ° 4 01 ,, s i:vi u yia t u li s,: c :e) i j e ce: n nid t p: . ,br . i.y ‘ tv N' i r.a i s his Majesty hiniseit 0 ) be ° , " 0 44! ' t . 0 00 ti n ii n n e .. j i tha l t n i ts , i v , Or i‘ y t i t ); ., ii s i t . l t 1 ' 1 :1 1 1 , 15 ' , ! 1 1• 1 placed, tit a much more tuortifylng JO u -7 0 1. before the Privyi,negkelluriViiiiiln;t°ll:.atrit'ebYldsluecl()lialiliiiiiti4 this nii e :ni t s t e ir j) thee phoieut fr inoman t :s w . %a t o i. oHLi k n l e: o ,istr u she s ,,o e 6uvi s eli „ o f Parliainvia ? at lq)E'°l the general sense of the House•was not w it ' 3 ,,tiej t o . e e rejeet 4 e riei d t :, it ti n ci cr a eli p t' re i c e e s d i et t i h t ai lfw A' Z irtlell ' el f :' , ~, atla ° ,4 . RID/IN' was rather - at a 100 c ri 0"; ii r bs i: Nk p S wba w ise h l 9 Fh e le t i l i : e e d n : e d j a i i s u: a t nl o s ad i f :Q uland t k r h ilit:Y el ia n niiis: , R e m o f lin y 'fol ea °) a reuett i n lir:ll t i F irbbt6 i i l 'itti°Pidt i lla F e c lis'in t illit i lwiiut : i : ll( l llll : : : lll : '.;rillti s they contended that his Majesty ought O t , ad, i J i_ rr milnugpei Majesty,d, , e etp t_ oro h lf e Parliamen t in h e a , d t ,ex t ahetnni:euti:qoutivistliboensatba unquestionably, L 1 1 .,; . 1 - l i l est nt anotherll.t. a n i a n it re t s t u q z e rn u Y a o ' r t a i e:r .n t t il h e o e i s p:o m w e e power i f o u f e p i r ) r o u r P o g Ureaui ii g i : 1) r l ci i :ig i 'III' position would 'not, on principle, be '„' L icl by the. 11,4-14, l e v .) i i e n ithge Righ tr t i f . e ) ll i ta s e I t w i t i;a;petpi, arable a r y b e wi ri t e l a l s e o l e . 0 3 3 1 s l i) lY e: 1: 11 , 111 b 1 i i ; ":" I ,l ' i) o i ° ri a g il i e n i ate the inquiry into his state 6.0 : 111::: : e i r44 : 11' . 1F contended strongly th a e g u i l i t i : Y° t i he Au p l o il l:ce rirv: . l e l) ;l Ills Majesty 10'1101 . 10 ° %If h 1/ ' ninate the persoos , it- ' I enter 'u,,..0n the inquiry. Ifer I\lajellOrt h %b eil . C '' ‘ , concurrence of lout of her Council , %."-edoie conceived his Majesty's health so far rev)/ er e of t ,, , be capable of tesuming the.persontileltercil4,,ai, I,Royald Authority,' were to mit ily that n P iLT. I 9I II 6 . hil _or President of the ' Privy. Coencil. f- ri 3 O . l o ( ' i , President was to tiLltliflloo the Ctitincih . `,,,i to / 6 - PurPosa ? it would miturally• be suPP:i ' y O ci :; a t mine . into' -the fad. Na.. 6u oh thing. C2.1 0 5 J 1 :'4 tt_ii _Y -ci'llisvibY P e:C e ra,, e shu l el ; htibl e iw4t o id: ris ln i tY s t ; ee i ar t n : c. g i'dit ' Y o ° f ll:7( a :r. n sr y Ce:l : l4l i ii u tin i er b ni ., A litill : (i 0 1:411 ::: 11: 1 51:i' nut less than nine,' '', whom his 2.5 0 J 4- ";" e O e :i . .tv c l " l4l l , e l l e b i er a s nd of w hi h s tl M ' s a t j a a ji t e• b l e . m ( o ).r fir. il llo3llll°'l3ll .A ..illb l l e ti rlir . 'll : a r uncil, and such persons so aisainttku ~,,„fri h i t /4 be dvemed to be a Privreouncii, tor 10 ;A T le:maitcr mentioned." , Wbat . w att tO I r ill °e . e . lare, ilsix of the nine - agieed in tllO-4. that'_ut "14 Majesty had Completely ICCOYeret jOi r p ii. att'itittnediate end to ail the Power'' tif 0 ce _ lt '_,s isell - toy the Regency Act. WClLliti '",i cult ig be 'StitisflCtory •lo t tie, pea-de d t , lllE S c iO ttr :! I. question ably , ..not. if the state of 'll's' IL: lath Were to be investigated at el/ hY 1 ,,;,/ 6 Council , it ought to be in ve stigated by iltilL;- 'IU t 7 71 1. a ~, t ' . •