The Sun. — London, England, 1822-07-30 00:00:00

THE LONDQN JOURNALS. EXTRACTS. FII.OM THE DAILY TIORNING PAPERS, July 30, 1822. [THE TIMES.] The attitude in which the French Government and its armies on the southern frontier have stood fir some time towards Spain and her popular in stitutions, must have been considered as, if not in the -highest degree menacing, yet calculated to. excite very grave, attention, and to justify no small uneasiness among the friends of Spanish liberty. The natural interest belonging to this subject has been much .augmented since Wed nesday last, when General l' Foy took occasion to - tax the French Ministers with a designing. and deceitful policy, in maintaining a powerful armed force upon the Pyrennees, bearing the name of a Sanitory Cordon, but neither fitted, nor required, nor destined, in fact, to fulfil the purpose which its name described. The pestilential feVer has dis appeared for eight months, yet the - Cordon Sanitairc remains immoveable. The position of Barcelona is on the east of the Pyrennees, but the troops are assembled towards the west, and successive trains of horse and foot artillery, -with 'two divisions (6,000) of cavalry, have been marched - to the same quarter, which are not, as it• seems, the •mosCproper instruments for repelling the ap proaches of contagion. We believi. it was ex pected that M. Montmorency, the Foreign Mi nister, would have disclaimed the threatening character Of, these Military movements, and would have given whatever satisfaction may be thought to attach itself to an official assurance, that the force employed was puraly.a preventive of dis ease : but this, expectation was far enough from being , answered by the Foreign - Secretary. On the contrary, his speech is throughout, as it 'ap pears to us, an indirect avowal of those views of political interference which, if they did not exclusively cause this armament, yet mingled themselves, according to M. Montmorency, with less offensive motives for assembling. the force " upon ,the Pyrennees. His first defence is, that the King had pledged himself to maintain the Cordon Sanitaire. 2d, That it was a pro. tection not only against pestilence, but against in sults, which might be the fruit of frequent con• filets on the frontier.—(He was answered here, that it was the French Ministry which had given rise to those combats.) The third justifi cation was, that although none could wish more earnestly than the French Ministers for the wel fare of Spain, that welfare 'could not be found but in the support of a strong Monarchical au thority. 4th, If new circumstances should call upon the French Government to discharge the duties of a: faithful Ally, the Government would know how, to perform those duties. sth, In a season of misfortune, " all our measures will " tend to preserve those great attributes insepa " rable from Monarchies—the, inviolability and " safety of Kings:" We have thus.selected from the speech of M. - Montmorency • all the passages which bear immediately upon the accusation of General Foy, and4e are borne out in affirming that the answer is a; confirmation of the charge. NE T TpIES.j. By an Express from Paris, which arrived yester day, evening, letterS and.papers.froin..that capital have been received - tO,:alate'liptir of the evening of Saturday. Thc,ntiWi : fronif;the Spanish Capi tal is not of a later -date: than we had previously received. We have, however,:: given an extract. from a' most interesting private letter _ which we have *received from Madrid, and which may be irnplicitely relied on for the account it gives of the general state of politics in Spain. The Jaurrial de Prfris asserts that M. De llardenberg and M. de . Bernstorff will leave Berlin about the 15th or 20th day of August to assist at - the Congress, and that M. De Tatischeff and M. De NesSelrode will attend the same distinguished assembly on the part of Russia. —As the Session of the French Chant bet- of Deputies draWs to a close, the Demo cratic Members indulge in :more furious anti monarchical declamations. One of these gentry -had the audacity to utter a philippic against the ancestors of the present King ; another, with .equal impudence, insulted the memory of, Moreau ,for having fought in the cause of .France and of lawful Government against the Corsican Despot. We say, "Mnreau fought for .France, Whilst his detractors fought to enslave their country : be was a supporter of his lawful King, and they -of rebellion. Such is the decision of History. A circumstance has come to our knowledge, which promises to prove highly important to the future prospects of Mexico.—Two Gentlemen of acknowledged • talent and ability have, within -these few days, 'quitted. fiavro for the place al luded to, whither they are. travelling in the as sumed characters of private Gentlemen. It seems, however, to be understood, that they are connected with the presenttFrench Government; and in the event of their report of the state of things in Mexico being favourable, it is generally believed, in the political circles in Paris, that agents will be appointed for the purpose of car rying on a diplomatic intercourse between the two countries. It is also rumoured that arrange ments to the same effect are about to be entered into with the Government of Colombia and Chile. [MORNING CHRONICLE.] Lord Holland,,in his eloquent and impressive speech last night in the House of Lords, on the subject of the Alien Bill, sheaved that instances of very foul abuse had taken place in the execu tion of that abominable law, and dwelt more particularly en the case of Las Casas. His Lord ship also met the argument of the measure being necessary to prev_ent this country being the heat re of plots against foreign Governments, by instancing the case of Turkey. " Did the Noble _Earl (he observed) mean to say that any Greek who fled to England from the car nage and misery inflicted by the Turks on his unhappy countrymen, and who was suspected—he Would not say by the Turkish, but by the English Government—of being active in the dissemina tion of principles calculated to rescue his native land from despotism, would be a lit object for the power granted by this 13iirPc . If Ministers I do say this, they must say that we ought to leave it with them to determine what Govern ments may and what may not be plotted against; and is this a law which ought to be imposed on a free people ? His Lordship took occasion to ap peal to the opinion of all our great Statesmen that " no country was more interested than Eng land in the expulsion of the Turks from Europe," and expressed an ardent hope that the beautiful provinces of Greece would, be rescued " from the arbitrary power under which' they had for three hundred years groaned." [BRITISH PnEss.] In the House of Lords last night the Earl of Liverpool moved the third reading of the Alien Bill, the necessity for which he argued on the old grounds, and also contended that although the Crown had the prerogative already, yet the Bill furnished a more summary mode of putting it in motion than was at present possessed. The Earl of Darnley and Lord Holland opposed the Bill; the latter particularly, on the ground that if it did not originate in, it at least countenanced, the opi nion that it was intended to demonstrate the de sire of the Government of this country to sup- port the views and aid the policy of the Holy Alliance, in maintaining the despotisms of the Continent against the struggles of-the people for freedom and constitutional forms of government. Lord Holland moved two clauses of the same tenor as those moved by Mr. Scarlett in the 'House of Commons, which were successively negatived without a division. The Bill was finally carried after a division on the question of its passing', in which the numbers were—Contents, 22 ; Not Contents, 6r—majority for the passing of the Bill, 16. ' Colonel Wood's Resolutions regarding the Laws of Settlement of the Poor stand for this evening. There is no notice of any other busi ness in the Rouse of Commons, and the few Bills now remaining will pass their last stage to-mor row. The House will then adjourn over for a few days, during which the house of Lords will dis pose of the business of the Session, preparatory to the prorogation of Parliament, which is ex pected to take place on Monday or Tuesday next.-- ( [MORNING POST.] In the House of 'Lords last, night the Irish Constables Bill and the Alien Bill were discussed, previously to their being passed by That branch 'of the Legislature. The Earl of - Liverpool sup ported the former, not as in • the abstract a de sirable measure, but as well suited to the present state of society in Ireland, and upon that ground entitled to their Lordships', ap probation. We believe most men acquainted with the situation of the Sister Country, and desirous of, its real . improvement, will sub 'scribe to this opinion. The Constables' Bill is certainly too pnlike the General Police Law of this country to appear justifiable in the eyes of Englishmen upon any other consideration than necessity. , But, in truth, Ireland has hitherto possessed the framework of almost the very same liberal system of subordinate civil power which we have, and the great de fect is, that she has either neglected or perverted this valuable acquisition: The pe,. culiar charm and beauty of the constitution 'of society ,in this country is the sinmitaneousind co-operative effort which every man; as it were, instinctively; makei to administer the laws in all their details. The people here make their own laws, and enforce as well as obey them. In 'lreland, on the contrary, with the same legal op • portunities to act similarly, it is hut too true, as Lord Liverpool observed last night, that neither rich nor poor have enforced or obeyed the laws as they ought. [MNINING HERALD.] Yesterday evening, in the House of Lords, a very important statement was made by the Earl of Liverpool respecting the Orange party in Ire land. We conceive it be highly important, be cause it evinces a laudable anxiety on the part of his Majesty's Government to 'do away those in vidious distinctions which have engendered such deadly animosities among the Irish people for more than a century past. On a question being put by Lord Holland, respecting the pro cession of the Orangemen in Dublin, on the 12th instant, and the reason why it was not prevented by the Lord Lieutenant, as had been done by the Duke of Bedford, when he was at the head of the Government in Ireland—the Noble Earl gave a most candid explanation. He said that what the Duke of Bedford had done was to put an end to the proces sion as a State ceremony, by giving orders that none of the Officers of State should take a part in it ; and it had never since been a State ce remony. But no Lord Lieutenant could prevent private individuals from taking part in such a procession. The present Lord Lieutenant did all he could to prevent that ceremony from taking place on the 12th of this month ; . but the law did not empower him to put a stop to it. Lord Liverpool expressed his disapprobation of the proceedings i❑ strong terms ; but he conceived it would be a very difficult thing to frame any Legislative measure that could put a stop to it in future. In this we perfectly agree with' his Lordship ; laws must be general in their operation; and any law enacted for prohibiting processions of ornament, would either be evaded by the offending parties, or they would extend to other processions altogether harmless, or per haps laudable in their nature. All the persons, for instance, attending a masonic funeral, might be subjected to pains and penalties. His Lord ship,' however, stated, that communications bad lately passed between the Government of Ire land and the Ministers on the subject, and that there was reason to hope that such means would be adopted as should put a stop to such proces sions in,Opture, without the necessity of Legisla tive interference. Cider is confidently expected to be sold in many parts of Devon, at from 12s. to 15s. per hogshead at the pounds mouth.--( Devon Freeholder.) FOR THE SUN. LETTER XVII. MR. EDITOR—In my Twelfth Letter, which appeared in your Paper of the 12th of this month, I gave the Oaths of Fidelity to the Roman Pon tiff, taken at this day by the Romish Priests and Bishops in Ireland ; and I shall now submit to the consideration of your Readers the opinion of Doctor Burke, titular Bishop of Ossory, as to an Oath of Allegiance, intended to have been taken by the Romish Clergy, and introduced into a Bill then (1757) under the consideration of the Irish House of Lords, to secure the Protestant ' Succession to .the Throne, as expressed in his Work, entitled " Ilibernica Dominicana," and published in the year 1762, to which I have al seedy made reference in the course of these Letters—" Would it not," asks this loyal and orthodox Divine, 44 exceed the greatest ima ginable absurdity, that a Catholic Priest, who instructs his Catholic , people in the will of God from Scripture and tradition, by his discourse and action, and nourished' them with the Sacral ment of the Church, should swear fidelity to King George, as long as he professeth a hete rodox religion, or has a wife of that religion ? Thai Then, and in that case, the same Priest ought instantly to abjure the very King to whom he had before sworn allegiance." In a Supple ment to his Work, published in 1772, he gives the opinion of the Pope's Legate, at Brussels, in the year 1768 ; at which time an oath, to be taken by Roman Catholics, was under the con sideration of the Irish Parliament, containing, in fact, no more than the Roman Catholic Com mittee disavowed twenty years after—that 44 the abhorrence and detestation_ of the doctrine, that faith is not to be kept with heretics,' and that ' Princes deprived by the Pope may be deposed or murdered by their strbjects; as expressed in that proposed oath, are absolutely intolerable, because," he (the Legate) says, " those doc trines are defended and contended for by most Catholic nations ; and the Holy See has fre quently followed them, in practice." On the whole, he decides, that " as the oath is in its whole extent unlawful, so. -in its,nature it is ins valid, null, and of no effect, in so much that it -can by no means bind or oblige consciences." Should any of your Readers have entertained , a doubt upon this subject, and at the same time have imagined that the oath proposed by Mr. O'Connell, in his famous Plan for Domestic No mination, would henceforth be binding upon the Romish Bishops,-1 think the authorities I have now cited must convince the most sceptical, that nothing can bind such Casuists to an heretical State, when the 'interest or authority of their Church shall intervene : for, be .it remembered, that the tenets described in my Eleventh Letter, from the .Decrees of General Councils, " are unquestionably at this day the tenets of the Church of Rome : they have never been re nounced or disavowed ; and till they are dis avowed by authority, every good Catholic is bound to obey them." On the 14th and the 15th of September, in the year 18081 the Romish Bishops of Ireland held a Synod at Dublin, for the purpose of expressing their hostility to the Veto,- proposed, with their concurrence, by their parliamentary friends, in the preceding Session, as a security to the State, in the event of what is called " Catholic Emancipation " having been conceded ; and, among other Resolutions, the two following were adopted :—" It is the decided opinion of the Reman Catholic Prelates of Ireland, that it is inexpedient to introduce any alteration in the canonical mode hitherto observed in the nomina tion of the Irish Roman Catholic Bishops, which mode long experience has proved to be unexcep tionable, wise, and salutary."—r" That the Ro man Catholic Prelates , pledge themselves to adhere to the rules by which they have hitherto been uniformly guided ; namely, to recommend to his Holiness only such persons as are of un impeached loyalty and peaceable conduct." A few Questions naturally arise from these Resolutions, which, if not satisfactorily answered, furnish, or ought to furnish, matter for the most serious consideration to Protestants. In the first place, what is " .the canonical mode hitherto observed, which long experience has proved to be unexceptionable, wise, and salutary " ? For myself,,l do conceive that, according to the De crees of General Councils, to which 44 Roman Catholics are obliged to adhere implicitly," a mode may be at once 4 ' C ANONICAL," and yet hostile to, and inconsistent with, the safety of a Protestant State. Secondly, to what period of time does the indefinite term ",LONG EXPE RIENCE " extend—to 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100 years ; or will they carry it hack to the Era of the Reformation, when, by the account of their friend Pastorini, Luther opened the door of Hell ? Lastly, if this "canonical mode, " which had stood the test of time, bad always been ob served, and if " only such persons as were of unimpeached loyalty had been recommended to his Holiness," —how came the whole Conclave of Irish Romish Prelates to have been raised to their respective dignities, who petitioned, and ob tained from Pope Benedict MU. in the year 1729, " an Indulgence for ten years, in order to raise money, to be speedily applied to restore King James 111. to his tight, and to put the present King and all the Royal Family to the sword ? "—or the following, that signalized them selves in 1762, as mentioned in my last Letter, viz. the titular Archbishops of Cashel and Dub lin, and the titular Bishops of Cork and Water ford ?—or the learned author of " Hibernica Dominicana ?—or, in later times, Dr. Hussy, titular Bishop' of Waterford, the celebrated writer of Pastoral Letters, replete with Treason ? —or some of the Heroes of 1798 ?—or, of • still more recent date, the man who, according to Dr. M'Nevin's testimony before the Secret Corn= mittee of the House of Lords, had been one of those Priests that had rendered great service in propagating with discreet zeal the system of the Union ? Indeed, so great had been his zeal, that General Loftus, who thought it ought not to go unrewarded, had diligent search made after him for several days ; but, as true merit always seeks the shade, so this 44 discreet promoter of the Union" . eluded pursuit; and, after having been baked in an oven for three days, is nott-,1 through a Popish miracle, a Prelate of 44 unim 'peached loyalty and peiceable conduct." In my last Letter I gave a brief account of the origin of Whiteboyism, in the latter end of the reign of George 11., and I sheaved, from the depo sition of Matthias O'Brien, a Romish Priest, and Coadjutor to the titular Archbishop of Cashel, that " the causes commonly alleged for the risings by the Whiteboys were but mere pre tences, and calculated to conceal their secret de sign," which was none other than the subversion of the Government ; and, as I conceive that there is a strong analogy between modern White boys and those of the period alluded to, not only as to the object they have in view, but also as to the alleged causes for the late risings, it may not be amiss to pursue the 'subject further—the rather, as misrepresentation seems so much the order of the day; then let such of . Your readers as have remarked upon late and passing events compare them with the account contained in my last, and with that I shall now give, and draw their own conclusions. ' From that period (1762) the Whiteboys continued more or less to agitate the South of Ireland, as the barometer. .of their hove or fo reign aid rose or fell ; but previous to the' year 1787 they broke out with renovated fury, under the new appellation of Rightboys, actuated, how ever, by the same hatred of the English connec tion, the Protestant Religion, and the establish ed Laws, which, for upwards of two hundred years, had characterized the Roman Catholics of Ireland ; and murder, devastation, and every species of cruelty to Protestants in general, but to the Clergy in particular, marked their pro gress. This too, after very considerable immu nities had been granted to their body (the Whiteboys and the Rightboys were exclusively Papists) by a Protestant King and a Protestant Parliament, and long after many Roman Cp.tho lics had publicly declared that they were fully sa tisfied with those great concessions."—" On the 31st of January, 1787, the then Attorney-Gene ral (afterwards Earl of Clare) stated officially the grounds of this insurrection to a Committee of the Irish House of Commons; by which it appears that the insurgents assembled at a Roman Catholic Chapel, and there took the oath to obey Captain Right (each leader of a party was a Captain Right) :—those last sworn went on the ensuing Sunday to the neigh bouring Chapels, and swore those parishes next ; and so on, ad infinitum."—" Tithes became the first object of reformation with those legislators ; next, they swore the people not to give more than a certain rent for Band ; not to assist Pro testant Clergymen with carts or cars, to draw away their tithes; and not to suffer tithe-proc tors—all of whom that fell into their hands they treated with a degree of cruelty unheard of before—cutting out the tongues of some, and burying others to the chin in holes lined with furze and filled with earth, there to perish. They next insisted that no more Churches should be built, unless the old ones were given up to them for Chapels ; and, finally, they determined to prevent the collection of the Hearth-money tax. In consequence, the Government was obliged to send a strong military force into the South of Ireland, and the ' Bill to prevent tu- Multuous Meetings' was passed, though not without considerable opposition on the part 'of certain liberal-minded Patriots, some of whom very jocularly compared the systematic insurrec tion of the Rightboys to a quarrel in consequence of too free an use of whiskey : however, the subsequent comparative tranquillity of those counties, in which it had been carried into ef fect, fully proved the wisdom and expediency of the measure."—" In the year 1789, those in surgents, the Rightboys, renewed their cruelties and depredations on their Protestant neigh bours ; and at this time they framed the follow ing mock oath of‘allegiance, which*was taken by the members of the society :—‘ We are bound to his Majesty King George the Third, and his Successors to the Crown ; so, for this present year 1789, we promise faithfully the same obe dience, and also whilst we live subject to the same Government.'—Compare this with the oath of al legiance framed by the Supreme Roman Catholic Council of Kilkenny,then in open rebellion against King Charles the First, in which they promised 4 to bear faith and allegiance to his Majesty, his heirs and successors, as far as they may' ; and who will not see the same Jesuitical sophistry, which has ever distinguished the members of the Church of Rome, equally as manifest in the year 1789 as it had been in the year 1641 ? But we shall find a solution of both in the Manifesto published by that arch-rebel the Earl of Tyrone, in the reign of Queen Elizabeth :—after inform ing his adherents that they could not conscien tiously obey an excommunicated Princess, he adds, though there might have been_a mitiga tion made by her in favour of Catholics, by which they might be licensed, in civil matters, to give her, during their inability, obedience.' " (See " Letters by a Protestant," published by CHAPPLE, Pall Mall, London.) Although I have mentioned that I would leave your readers to draw their own conclusions, yet I cannot avoid making a few remarks, by way of drawing a parallel between the insurrections in 1762, 1787, and 1821. They bear str ong cor responding features, not only as to the object and design, but also as to the means used,to carry them into effect. The insurgents, at each of those periods, have been bound by an oath—in 1762, to the Pretender and the King of France — in 1787, to Captain Right—and in 1821 to Capt. Rock. The alleged causes at each period have been the same—the Abolition of Tithes and Taxes, and the Reduction of Rent to their own standard. In 1762, as appears by the deposi tion of Father O'Brien, those alleged causes C 4 were but mere pretences, and calculated to conceal their secret designs ;" and it 'must be manifest to every rational, unprejudiced mind, that they were but mere pretences in 1787, and are so at the present time. In 1762 • several bf the Romish Bishops, and a considerable number of the Priests, took an active,part in the conspi racy ; and I ask any man, 'endued with common sense, if he can suppose, from the Report of the Attorney-General in January 1787, that the or- • •• • • ganization of the Rigiitlioys, at the diferent chapels, could have been effected without the knowledge and sanction of the Priests ? As fo r , the Romish Clergy of the third period, I gull' only add, that the republication and disseminati on, in 1821, of Signior Pastorini's work, speak v 0 lumes. Finally, the same hatred of Prot estantg, —the same system of cruelty to individual s of that religion—the same destruction of property-' and the same hostility to the Protestant clergy, and even to churches, have marked each insurreo' Lion, as they did in the open Rebellion, in t o year 1798. 'And why, it may be asked , is al this ? I cannot better resolve the question than in the words of Bishop Louth, in a Serrnen preached in 1779, which conveys too just a re semblance of Ireland in 1822 :- 44 Popery , that " more than Egyptian darkness st ill covers a " great part of the land ; a darkness which may i " be sensibly felt in its 'pernicious effects an d " destructive consequences. It is the great ob " stacle that stands in the way of every ben 5 " fi cial, every generous design ;it coun tered _ cc every principle that leads to loyalty an d tr U e o 44 piety; to industry and useful knowledge, i t 46 national strength, security, and happiness. • " inspires its wretched votaries with a detestation " of that Government which protects them, because cc administered by those whom they call usurpers " and heretics ; and makes them ready to Or / " the enemies of their country, because they c;, 5 " themselves Catholics ; a name perverted in " application to the very contrary of its tru e " meaning. The love of their country be in h g e " thus extinguished in their breasts, one of t", " strongest incitements to the noblest ex ertion :. " of the powers of body and mind is dest ro y ed ' " Their understanding, subdued to the be lief ° " gross falsehoods, and habituated to absurdities: " is weakened and depraved ; it becomes inWe ke cc vious to th,e light of truth, and callous to tl_ " force of argument. Intrenched in , ignOranCteol 44 and in a language of their own, little knn` cli p a " others, and difficult to be attained ; " to the peculiar customsand superstitions o f Ole o "'ancestors ; fixed in an obstinate adherence o f cc hereditary errors and a determined hatred ea " those whose duty it is to remove them ; if v o a by the terrors of dreadful anathemas, an" •,, a . cc the case of converts at least,) by the oblibto " tion of oaths, binding them not to hear);.eilder 44 reason, or yield to conviction, they re n oo , " themselves inaccessible to human instruct of " and give up their claim to the 44 direction the Word of Gon." Cork, June 22, 1g22 sIPS LONDON MARKETS. PRICE OF BREAD THIS WEEK. 4 0 0 The highest price - of the best Wheaten Brea d thr oe 90. le Metropolis, is stated by the principal Bake rs to b: Quartern Loaf.—Some Bakers sell the Quarter! " e one penny to two pence lower. lb. 02. h 4 Peck Loaf to weigh .. 17 6 Quarter n Lo af to Wog g 9 Half ditto.. ditto 811 Half Quarter!) ditto •' IMPORTATIONS OF GRAIN LAST W'.E l "l o reig n, English. Irisi , • Wheat • ........ . Barley ... 898. ....—... ...,„... Malt - .„,...,.. Oats . 5,954 2,730 ...,.... Rye* 42.7 ...„,„ Beans . 1,820 -- ~...." Peas . , 1,074 ....--- .........„ Tares - - ........., Rapeseed ' 1,871 ,—..... ......„, _...... ........„... Mustard Seeds 791 ____— ..--"' Flour : 5,450 ----. ...---- Brank - I,a o ° Linseed •. _...------------ Red Clover SEEDS, July 29. per ort• (Foreign).. 24s 32s—fine, 445 525 ---s -54 a w 44s v 25 Ditto English It. 20s 35s—tine P e .. ',,: - 60 s White ditto 3os 46s—fine , ,'" 5 ,,,-, per fir, Rye-Grass ... l4s to its new, 9 -u s ', - " -4 ' Turnip Seeds. . —s 041 6s to 7s pr.-husii. White Mustard Seed .. Brown ditto 9s to its Od . Spring 26s otl to 30s Otl 34; ~., Carraway Seeds Coriander do. 95 tOs 14s . ner (11.! Cinque Foin . • 2Ol to 2tl• lOs sys to 345--fine ---, ot, Trefoil .~. Ribgrass ... l2Bs 34s—fine, 40s 445 r. Canary .• • .... per qr —s 30s to 345 Oti Per ',, r . Linseed .. • —s--sue, —s -- 5 P c ' . ' Raye Seed ~ Winter Tares .. .... 28s to 36s Od per qr. Per L3st. ..------=-----, ST. JAMES'S HAY MARKET----- , JulY -27 . A I 4 4 to - o 1 i Hay .. 31' 5s ad to 41 4s Od 1 Glom r, ‘,5 •. 3 1 e l 2 i New Hay 21 10s Od to 31 14s0d straw 11 4s ad to 04 1 SMITHFIELD. 3 1 " 0 3 Old Hay 2l 17s Od to 31 17s 6d--Averagot 1 1 104 0 4 Straw Clover 31 5s Od to 41 7s 6e----Aver a g e ' - 0 3 WHITECAPEL. 3 1 I" Od Hay 3l 6s ad to 41 H 4s Oti--Averaget 01 0 4 0 4 New ditto Ol Os Od to 01 Os O d---Averag e, 11 115 04 Straw ' 11 lOs ad to 21 2s Od--Av e roge , 91 10§ Clover 3l tis Od to 4 ! lOs Od--AverarL.../-' RAW HIDES. d io" p Best Heifers & Steers, per st. Ordinary .• • • 15 21 „, 0 3 35 211 to, 3s 5d Market Calf • • e - .: i ' t ° ,; '- Middlings 2s 10 d t4 l 3 Et sac i i , S E K n I g N . S. Horse s 7 1 : 1 to too 3 1 0,1 0 Fells Downs —d to —d 1 Lambs ....... • PRICE OF LEATHEIt• ,to is Butts, 50 to 56Ibs each Ditto, 56 : t0 tilbs each Dressing Hides per lb .... ..... d t to t,g, T ti Coach Hides Crop Hides, ;l5 to 40lbs tor cutting..... I°4 V' .... • • ~ to ~.,1 Ditto .... 45 to 501bs Calf Skins. ;00 to 40Ibs .......... 51:3(1 ' -'t .......... , to ~j Ditto 50 to 70Ibs ................... • 28 ,1 to g'„,l Ditto 7O to HOlbs ................. •. • ' 2 " to 1 " t .. 190 to i!'4l lied Small Seals (Greenland). .................... -41 Large ditt0......... ....................... lua Tanned Horse-Hides ..................... • 15 , A to-4 `2 . Spankli Horce Hicks ................. • 16", joy eqb v i . , PRIC:I 4 .S OF TALLOW, SOAP, ikc. per 1 lilb• Town Tallow 37s Od —s od I Yellow SbaP ...... ...••'. 8 6 ! Yellow Russia 36s od —s od 1 M o ttled ........ White ditto . • —s oil —s Oc: Curd .......... • • Soap ditto.... 33s ud —s Cid Graves ....... •"' ~••• Melting Stuff 28s od —s od Good D re g s.• ••• .• I ,to Ditto Itoggli.. 13s ud —s od Lso 6-• PRICE OF CANDLES, FROMTALLOW CRAND Ids, 10 5 rvi° Price of Candles, per dozen , 94 Oil -- -- n u o i. 64 per dozen allowed for ready In ° ia ly PLACE OF RAW FAT, per St one of 61t)'-'-' Price of Tat' •-!ii by •Tr " low (as state , COUNTRY 2 1 2f1:! 11- AI Altti T. AnKET, Jiity c 2,• . q. Barley, new, I " t 1 0 °1 I /°5 Deans, per qr. 11s _, ii ia # Pease, per qr. 11 6 5 '' oi vs Rye, per 4r. 01 Os to GUILDFORD M Wheat per I. 51 Os to 151 Os New Wheat .. 1510 s .Os Oats, per qr... 01 ISs to 11 5s New ditto.... of os to of Os COAL MARKE'I, Jul' 49 Pri C 4 C 05 64 Ships sold. 355 Oda 415 6 4 .. • ° ....... • . 39 6j 91. • • Ships at . Market. Ne*castle is Sunderland Ur . J Printed and Published for the PRritirTolls' O c A BA I ' S th e Office, No. 112, Strand, by . 13. . , -ot h 4 L !I_, r . ... ; •11::::1[1417* 'iro n • -11 the left ''! vie ( 12 "ht hud Son Ai; • An Ala T. 13. 11. ~~~ 11. 1 ~~', 1(7,