The Sun. — London, England, 1814-02-25 00:00:00

LA' .7 INTELLIGENC.E. COURT OF 4 KlN(i's BENCH, tga. PER:1( 7 121". THE KING MITFORD, ESQ. This Was ;in indictment for perjury, in the affis "davit upon which the rule nisi for a. criininal in s:stion against Mr. Phipps, the Proprietor of I:he. :Sunday Paaer called The Neirs, for certain nbon Lord and Lady Perceval . , was ; and the assigninents of pct jury were', the isasly Prrceval dith not, as sworn by th'e de fens-Jrit, on the 31st of March last, inform the sit:ft-octant that sle had letters of great rouses tpsence indeed ,to ptiblish, and that Mr. Phipps si . pneared to her the man most likely. to do them jestice ; that she did not, in reference to the said letters, s.,iy to the defendant that the experiment they were 'going , to make was a dangerous one, but that something - nest be done to compel them to give a proper establishment to her Royal'High 7 ncss the PrineesS of Wales; that•the defendant never did, at the desire of she prosecntrix, or in her presence, copy from a mauusct ipt, in her hand- Writing, the three letters in the, said affidavit par ticulaily set forth ; that the proseentrix`never said to the defendant, that the spirit of John Bull was tleclioing or dying away, but that would render him Claniormis ; that she never said to the defen dant, - that it would be absolutely requisite for him to he out of the way a few weeks after the pnblicatian .of the said letters, and that she hid at first thought of lodging him and his wife (wlio nmst also not . be seen) at the Tiger's Head, at Lee . ; hots up;sn reflection, that was 'too near Blackheath, and that she settled that he and his wife were to go to the mother of the prosecutrix's friend, I la rdcastle, who resided at Woolwich, where tt4y would be perfectly safe; that the defendant was never 'asked by.the prosecutrix; whether, if the synrst happened, the defendant would submit to be confined in Whitmore,-house till all was settled, ; as it would be at- least 20001. in his way when it teas-over ; that she never did inform him,'that the danger was . in his being brought to the bar of the House, which, as be knew so much, would be very unpleasant ; that he did not COPY the afore- Said letters from a manuscript in the band-wt king of the prosecutrix, and never 'did receive any di rections from her to hasten to town to find out N. Phipps, and to desire him to publish the same in his newspaper ; that the defendant had at divers • times reason to believe and know the said ittters were, forgeries ; that the defendant in the whole affair did not act by the direction of the prosecntrix -; and that he had, at the time of his making the said affidavit, other reasons to sup pose the said letters forgeries than the assertion of the prosecntrix, and, in fact, he well knew them to he . forgeries. Mr. Hour stated the case on behalf of the pro secutious he said that the prosecutrix had be came acquainted with the defendant from the si milarity of his name to that of a famiiy with which she was connected : she found him (Ilse. tressed and discountenanced, and endeavoured to establish. him in independence. But the case will sufficiently conic out front the testimony of the witnesses. • Lady Perceval said, that she saw the defendant on the evening of the 2d of April last, at her bonsts at Blackheath : she never mentioned to hint'. that she had letters of great consequence to. pub lish, and that Mr Phipps appeared to her to be the man the most likely to do justice to the Prin.-, cesss of Wales ; or that the experiment was a dangerous ene: -but something must be done to compel them to give a proper establisliment-to the Princess of WaleS: the defendant never by her desire, or in . her. presence, copied . the letters wkich were now shetrat 'her; nor had she ever the manuscript of them : the first time she heard of them was from Mr. Phipps, who sent her his News of the 4th of April, accompa nied by a letter :.she bad previously ordered the paper : she never said the spirit of John Bull was dying away, but this would render him Clamo rous : she never told the defendant would be absolutely necessary that he should he out of the way after the publication for any time. As to the allegation respecting the todgntent of the de fendant and l.is wife in the neighbourhood of Blackheath, she said that in'consequence of a re presentation made by the defendant previously .to the 26th of March, that he was watched-and pur s sued, - , and Ms house beset by inqUiries from those with . svho .e m he pretended to have had communi sations, that Mrs. Mitford, in consequence of het alstmovas seriously indisposed--she advised the defendant to remove flee out the town for a little ' while ; and she believed the first idea might have been for them to remain foe that period at Lee; but this representation was not with reference to the letters, although previous to the .26th of March : she never hadstn idea that such letters were inexistence. 'She never asked hint whether, if the worst halve*, he Would sdhmit to be Confined in Whitmore-house, or that the letters would be 20001. in his way, 'or that there was 'a 'danger. of his being brought to the bar of any House. On secitmg the letters in time paper, site itumediately sent Mr. SPeechly to Mr.Phipps s to in form him' she knew nothing of them. She sent her son to town to bring the defendant to explain Mr. Phipps's conduct. On Sunday, Aprils), the de fendent came with Mr. Hardcastle ; the witness came into the roomwith-The News. in her hand, ind with Mr. Phipps'sletter ; she gave 'both to the defendant, bat did not : recollect w,hether he read them ; ,she said to him,'" In (.'cod's name, Mr. ix. what have youheen abdut ph;you know any thing of the letters in The News of this day?" The • defendant replied, " What do you mean "" She, minstvemed, " Bead that letter, and you will un elqrstand.i."llte defendant. then said, with an oath, he" never slaw, thefellows but twice in liis life ; • he ptonosed, immediately, to go to Mr. PhiPns, upon which she lufoesned him she had sent for Mr. I'., and expected himsvery sbortly. Bete eels four and. six o'cloclt Mr. I> arrived, and 7 the di fendaut, the tnomen.t .Me. P. was announc-. td, rushed out of she room, and she saw no.more 'of him. She afterwards scut Messrs. Sties:alley and, flaideastle a second. time to bring the de fendant ; lie r epeatedly said hu.knew nothing about the letters; it war 9u Aionday morning that she • • Sent ter the derenifat ; be as brought down on Wednesday evening about eleven bn't 'sire did übt' - set him then, and had never *eiti hiui sine€•. • Upon her cross-ekiainati•On said she had occasionally etitplo4;ed The defendant to ins'ert paragraphs iii the .daily prints, cm. the • 'subject of the affairs-of the Prin•Ces's of Willes": some were inserted, And tonic not: they were thought too strOiig ; one was inserted in a Mit tilated state, and she complained to the defendant thereof ; the.rechlkeledmiting several letters to the defendant, which were, produced and preVed, eis 'were several others addressed to the defendant, and one to Mr. Phililis ; also one in the name of Lady Anne Hamilton ; and Anther to Mrs. Mit! ford, after the publication of the 4th of April. [These letters, which were -afterwards read as'. part :of the defeadant's evidences proved, that . Lady Perceval had sent communications to The News before, and Ills° to other newspapers.] She' requested_ot Mr. Phipps, with reference.to the de fendant's -mink! and connections, that if, consis tent with 'his duty to the public, lie could avoid the exposure of the defendant in so disgraceful a transaction, she hoped he would <lo so. He said, lie must explain the manner in which he had re ceived them from the defendant. She. th,en request ed him to state generally only that the letters were forgeries. She did this out of respect for the defend- Pant's lamily. SI: e informed M r.Phipps,,that a contra diction wotdd certainly appear in the next day's pa pers, and she offered to put that contradiction in that • form of words the least humiliating•to- She did not take Mr. Phipps by the hand, and say to hint, " my dear - Mr. Phipps, it you will hut in sert it asi avish, you will be the saviour of my, 'self and my family ;" or, " if things n•Cnt on as she expected, another Perceval would - become Chancellor of the Exchequer, - and then would come, the printer's reward." • She now said to the . Court, " I' wish -he may become Chancellor of Exchequer ; but I tid not communicate that wish then to. Mr. Phipps." She did not suggest that the defendant should go to Whitmore-house : but on Alp. Mitfo•cl' ~ S complaining to her that her husband's conduct was outrageous,. she ad .vised her to have one of Mr. Wat•burton's Men he had been deranged a twelvemonth before. The paragraphs were some of them intended for The Star newspaper; as to the'insertion of some, she, gave the defendant no particular direetions: there were none for The News :- she wrote a letter in Lady Anne Hamilton's name, by her desire, ne-. Inowledging the offer of the columns of The News, which had been, made by Mr. Phipps. • Mr. Hardzastle, Clerk in the dock-yard at Wool wich, Mr.' Speechley, who resides with Lord n u d Lady Perceval, dependent upon.their bounty, arta Mr. Perceval, their son, were present at Lady Perceval's interview Nvitti the defendant, and con firmed her testimony ,as ,to what atagsed. thereat. The alefendaut appeared extremely desirous to leave the room, under pretence that he would fetch Mr. Phipps from town ; and when told Mr. Phipps hood-been sent for, said he was sure he would not he able to come, as he.was' engaged in preparing .the Monday edition of his newspaper. Mr. Speechley and Mr. rereceal deposed, that as the defeailaut was quitting tile hGusa,. ;lc met Mr. rhipps coming into it : they shook hands and talked aside in the back-yard, after which the defendant was-not seen. These witnesses follow ed him'to London, and were denied at his 'nag= ings, when they watched at an opposite public house, and saw him at the window. In the even ing they gained admittance, and found him lying on his bed ; he said, he hoped they came as his friends ; they-replied they did, and hoped .he would explain to. Lady Perceval how he came in possession of the forged letters; he refused to go to Blackheath, and said, that -as he had always en joyed her kindness, he cotdd not bear her frowns : he confessed the forgery ; said he could not bear to see his family's distress, and had not been able •• to resist a bribe : he said the bribe was offered by 'Col. Bloomfield : he at last consented to accom , - pally the witnesses- to Blackheath, and upon go ing to a looking-glass to repair his dress, said Don't I look horribly ? Don't I look like a villain ?'"They all returned to Blackheath, • and arrived there between ten and eleven o'clock at night : they did not see Lady ,Perceval and the detendaht went into a bed-room ailjohling the study to, lie down, while the witnesses•watched in the study : they sat up till five o'clock, when they lay down to sleep, and upon waking at seven o'clock' the defendant was gone. S They followed him to town, And he there said he had seen Lady Perceval, _and settled the whole matter, although, the witnesses knew, this was false.- Mr. Spfeehley, upon his cross-cxamination by Cu woos, said that he had copied a letter for Lady Perceval, intended - for a Newspaper-; and that he had seen her and the defendant writ ing together. - The case on behalf of the prosecution was here closed. • Mr. ALLEY addressed the Jury on the part of the defendant, commenting at much length on the evidence prAnccd, sheaving itsinconsistemdes and improbabilities, •He argued that this was a complete scheme formed by Lady Perceval, which had . fortunately failed, anti that one part of it was to screen herself behind Mr. Mitford, who was, for her purposes, to ,be made insane, and to be confined in 4 mad-house. He insisted that it was by design that Mitford was allod'ed to escape on Sunday; April 4, because Lady Perceval dared not confront him with Phipps, lest it'should ap pear incontrovertibly that she was the forger and fabriciitor of these letters. To spew the custom of Lady Perceval in sending libellous paragraphs the newspapers, he read some of them, as well as various letters to Mr. Mitford, as proving the deep design she had in view. Among others were the following curious specimens. The first is a letter addressed to .the defendant, and resreCted the paragraph sent back from The Star Nelten, when a child, said, what is fear, I never saw it ? Mr. T- never would hate won the battle of the Nile.-- Chose- fear who espouse a had cause; we, who contend for justice for the Princess of Wales, and for our-.future , Queen, need not fear.—Cowards never gain the field. I wish to God I'—lad been any where hut there just then, and Lhope he will have a prosperous voyage, but a speedy rethrn. I would Mr. M---, be►ng a wan as be is, of -bold, intrepid, and valiant principle• of energetic and chivalrous feelings, were alone proprietor of this paper!--I hate half measures, half arguments, half appeals to the public sense and heart.---Rush upon your enemy, surprise, astound him, and terror unhorses hiai. I shall be glad if the abortion of to; letter does good,. . , • wlfeu wacile to cortpts !. ...e as tlis wa3-, the !one 'part with the other so well connected, that it should be tine; al:out - hid,. and w hit. only thrown • to the ,Pub -s',e§terday wts very day for, us ; the ,tide-Serving gloiiimt, Which Sh&kespearc raids us watch and ceteb. But what • ie'done cantit'it he heloaal ; another tinie no 'mutilation, 'and what Mr. T----.111::V Mit iI&VP .stonotch for, May please an 'other aPpetite, •and somethibg of lighte'r digestion say be prepared fOr `him. I am sure Mr. -- was truly tlistritssed, • ex. When My. goes fnto he 'country, will Mr. M--- have Power to insert at . his Pleastrre It is really cruel,to Imre thus torn:me piecemeal ; for observe how the feonnec- e . Zion of the Parts is destroyed by it. How difficult to regain. the snake, which would So keenly hitve stung, without the 've llum heing libellous! Send Me back my copy, for I let :Ye notie, and cannot recreate till I have it. So, without loss of time * post, return it to me, and 1 will see what,l can do with it.— Preituite me that if Mr. M— will not insert as I send it, save and except any expression that may be strictly libellous (which I am sure that letter was \ not), return toy the • thole ; for as the cause must not suffer for others squeamish, Bess, it 01-Mild find its way, somehow to the public, but not with the same signature as. that given to Mr. M--." 'Another letter was read in the following terms,. ; written to the defendant also : write. this' in haste, 'lest:you will disappoint me again and again, as yon have done before, though I hope you will not, as it.is of the utmost importance to our agency and Chi vary Cause, that you should not leave me so ignorant., &c.— Besides, 'you.were to have brought me a letter from Mr. Downes, &c. Next place I want The, paragraph about Billy Austin, for I suppose Mr. M— does not wish to insert it, as lie ,has not ; on the contrary, in the paper of last night, I see an allusion, an extract on the subject, but very- tame anti in efficient. I could therefore wish you- to'bring it back to me, that I may do what.' like with it, and make some use of it.— I should he glad of the oilier scrap about GA sate the K—.' I. beg you trill get possession of the copy back for nit, of ,the letter which was written in large hand," &c. I do not send the other, whim' is ready, because, since Mr. M---,--- has not liked Billy he may not Me this, and as I do not hear front him I always fear accidents, and the worst moral accident, peo ple chaiqing, their 'feelings. I do repeat, that now is the mo ment of fife tide serving for our *pose, John Bull's been is her's, and his eyes are now open."—The leiter then ob serirA, that if the people of Eugland were found 'so•readY to -‘ espouse the cattse of " Mrs. Clarke the p--" agaiast one 'son of the Kim:, would they not he much more eager to espouse that of their future.Oueen ?' It rocees—" ides: I ,51.1,` you in the interim Send me down Mi.. Dowoes's letter aed &e.—Caustyou come this evening be'we e " 10 anti 12 o'clock; you will find me returned from Fulharn.—lf Mr. M— will chnse ;mother - letter for to-morrow's paper, come•atul say so, but. 1 do not send it without being certain that it will he accepted. I can put Billy A-- in time form • of a letter, fur launch wish it should be in : the paragraph of last night called forth not an atom of warm feeling : Such benevolence as that of the person in "question should be known, and not be misrepresented. Your's, &c:" A -Third Letter contained the following ex ' pressions:— • , • " Where is the copy of the letter, for I suppose-yoU have sent it now ? I have had no ,Vers; you promised them td the last night: pray tiring -them' to-morrow, &e.. You may Nine down this eveniicg it you can, to tell me all that has passed since. - I ant gying out at five o'clock. I must sets you before, Monday i you can. When is the other letter to be in,.&c.? I assnce you we must work them well.• If Mr. M— does tint like to put it. in I wish you • would withdraw it, that I may send it elsee'here. M— I think neglects the cause." • A Fourth Letter was in these words : " It is very singular. that since my son left you on Friday evening', I have ileiti,er heard of you nor seen you. No papers —no infieT tiOn , :• 1 am aft aid your friend M— does net Mean- . or wish to insett either letter; he !sad - leach beiler have said this candidly from the first. Therefore, without fail,.l nest roquire you to bring hack both the MSS. oilthe remarha and rf the letter; birth artratsolntely necessary for the puldicatien of the-cause. You may.sav to your f6ent! Mr. M—, that since lie and-Mr. T— Alert to flnen Y" r friend di - Teets you to return them imine3iately. I Ope..y,in have nisi forgotten the to-inorroees yc L es y<iu understand niy shin. You mast tint come to •.yhere I am, fPt to the Green Man Inn, and send me a message to say you are tisere, I shall be in town - early in-thy Morning,therefOre let me hear from you at all events, &c." The Learned Counsel also read the letter.writ tett by 'Laity Perceval to-Mr. Phipps,. on Monday the rt'th - of April, requesting him to come again to Perceval Lodge,' and the note heg:nning with the compliments of Lady Anne Viamilton to Mr. Phipps, thanking him for the offer of his inde pendent cob:lnns, and accepting his proposal. The followini: witnesses were then called on., behalf of the defenthint. sir. Phipps ,said, that when he had the inter -41,1m on Sunday, the 2d of April, with , Lady Per ceval, her son was, at. first present,-aunt she said: - she had not seen the defendant since Thursday the witness replied, her Ladyship must be !Isis", i taken; as he had just met him going out of the house ; she then dismissed tier son, and. said this • was a most unfortunate business, and the letters must be contradicted ; she did not at first say they were forgeries, and the letter which she sent to summon him made use of the word rectUicalion ; she pressed -bins very earnestly to contradict the letters, and seemed greatly agitated ; she said, she %could 'herself 'contradict them in the daily pa pers ; the witness refused to contradict them, say.: ing he had advertised thoir appearance in the daily papers two days before, and could not, without a full nisi:illation how he came by them. At Lady Perce.val's- request, he sat down and wrote con tradictions for the daily papers by her dictation ; be was at last. wearied 'with withstanding her im portmnities, and, without promising, said, he would go home and consult his friends. At part ing, Lady Perceval rook him by the •hand, and said, ". My dear Mt. Phipps, you will he. the sa viour_ of my family." At this tnotrient her son came -in, and she made hint vow an eternal friend.: :ship for the witness, and Said her son would he high in administration one day, and then the wit "ness, should not be forgotten , . , Upon his cross-examination by Mr. Ilot.T, time witness said, that he had before received whet articles for The News, in the hand-writing of Lady Perceval, two of which were inserted, one about certnm twopenny-post letters, which formed the Only notices which. the Queen nett.Princesks took of the Princess of Wales upon the sudden death' *of her mother. and the other out the subject of the Duchess of Brunswick's will and a third, which was so seandalons'a libel, that the witness refused to insert it. The defendant always told the witness, that he had, copied time letters in question at Montagtve i house, in the presence, of the Princess of Wales, who was talking so loudly that she interrupted him ; the defendant like \‘ ise told bins Lady Perceval gave, theta to him, with directions to bring them to the witness, Upon the witness shew in a note he hall received, thank irigltint for his services, signed " G. P." to La'tiv A. Hamilton, she said it was impossible to pro - pounce Olson the Princess's hand-writing : she Wrote twenty different 'hands ; and once - .conde ' scended to imitate Lady - Anne's ; she said there was nothing on the face of the letters in qtlestiors to induce her tr. think them not genuine, if the account this witness gave of them were true ; and it was nothing that one of them was in the name of Lady Anne ; for Lady Perceval had carte bla)whe from her to use her name in all the con cerns of the. Princess oi'•Wales ; bet she had often told Lady Perceval she disapproved of her news ' paper connexion. Tice witness said he did not shake hands with the defendant, as had 1311e11. *re ICY lot 'wide a.: 'he I.7aid . „ i'Vtiffurd, ni 'man w a nted to 'See :" !tte (kit:ad:ant i'',, iris hared 'for thc•WittiesS to go, in, Laidy.AntiefiiuniltO was one the L t Bed-chamber 'to the lifincos .jf AP!; last; she 'reCottected Phippst with fetters in Mc Neil's; she at last 'readthetn, him she was Convinced they were all forgeries . said that the defendant•gdye thein to him, and 5314 ' : he had eoptiedthem•at INiontagno-house', in the P re : Bence Of the Princess of Wales ; he 'said ire very much alarmed - 4 writing_in the presence • s great a peesonaKe. The Witness - asked Mr. PhiP,P: if the defendant received them from Lady Per c .`'', val Y Mr. Phippsreplied, the defepdant never 0.. naMed Lady Pereevai ; the witness had seen or. corresponded with the dcfendant, sent her a familiar note, which was lead to tr Court the witness was then examined as to t note imputed to the Princess of Wales : she Mr. Phipps she was quite sure it was a loci.:y . Y and positively swore she.never told hint the I ri° ; cess was accustomed to write• twenty tlia . `' re i n hands, and, had condescended to imitate h e r's 5 . 0 r • desired tb refuse Mr.' Phipps's columns : she ne". • told Mr. Phipps she, discountenanced Lady Vet; ceval's newspaper connexion, or said any about it. Upon hpr cross-examination,. she said she ," never given "Andy Perceval carte blanche to v;r it : in her name, and if that Lady had done so, it ' 3 " a breach of confidence. Mr; IfoLT replied. • Lord ELLENBOHOUGIT, in charging the Ju r Y`' commented severely on the Conduct - of Lady re t: : ceval, who hail, at. least on other occasions, 11 '"; i this renfortunate . defendant the agent of 'RN: I "i upon the mutilated insertion of one of which , 4' • regretted that the venom .had not effected its Pe' pose;, and dwelt particularly upon a letter IvOt te ,! by Mr. Phipps, front The IVe,as o'clock of the morning on which the letters al: • prayed in his paper, addressed. to Lady Percetl ° : ,saying, he had sitten up the whole night evairirl' for the return of the article reri. , ed frain _heath, as the defendant had promised him it siw t " ( be returned, and, on ac,:ount of , the noit-perfo o "' ance of that' promise, apologising foritiocco r i j ,; • cies. This was strong to . s:iew Lady Perce""i previous acquaintance with the letters. His .1. 0 ` 4 ship also adverted to a fulsome letter of fieco"i .. . compliment, written in the name of 1,,,ady 1 " — ., Pantheon, to the Editor of The News. The cha r :'" was interropted,by the Jury, %Kilo avowed 4 11° 7 selves already satisfied w find the defendant i ‘‘ ) • Ger /fly_ The trial lasted from ten o'clock in the m orui° o till six in the evening ARCHES COURT, DOCTORS' COMMONS, Fii• Al) UL T E R BEST AGAINST LADY EMILY BEST. bf This cause of divorce, which was brou:rbt Mr. Best against Lady Emily BeSt, his wife , reason of adultery, alleged to, have been !witted with a Mr. Henry, was argued by it set in the course or the Term, and the Le . ; Judge' (Sir JotiN Nicnota.), was then of c,t 'l3 front -the :idence produced,— a4ultery ‘vsts clearly established; bat would (live years having elapsed since tile tery had been committed, before the had brought his suit) postpone his sentencc' 111 the purpose of giving hint an oportunity, by at i, vit, of - explaining the reason of such oe: I t o as •it raised a ground of suspicion in his Judge's) innid, that there was connivance an( l '; ‘ ,/ quiescent:eon the part di the hushod. ,lib'' an affidavit was given in. on the R a f t of , _pest, the admissibility of %vhich wits ol'i c ;, 4 l ed to by. Lady Best's. Counsel, on the gr ut ''y that it . was not compete:a fur, the Court ; 1 : e , wit the supplementary oath of the hushand• ing interested in the cause. This ohjectioll ,1 0 overruled .I,Py‘ the Judge, and the affidavitlr , read, stating carious reasons for tliec:tase of .`l,O lay, in not instituting tile suit sooner. l , ) • ,Learned Judge said, .the affidavit, prodticol t o geared to him to he full and satistact,ay, 1 ; 01 the points of explanation required,. and' tna, e O . he was bound to pronounce that the husband entitled to the remedy which he prayed. DISTKIkIUTION - OF PRIZE-MUNE / Y. j„ir ° To the Iris, fur the .Aliferican schooner Mariner ( th e ra t ' in company) on the 2rl March, at No. 9, - New 13reati-'1 and recalls at the same place for three months. - . c of •To the Urge i nt, for the Die Hutinurg the Daphne 03 d patty) on the - id March, at No. 9, New Broad-street, 31 ' calls al. te same lace, for tree months. 0 the h Lyra, for p the Hanna h h Elizabeth, at N 0,23, 4 , . °1 stunt, Strand, for three mouths. To the Arwide, for la tivilite (the Piercer in ";,;0 and thi. recapture of the Sparkler by the Nizarud.(irvle is the Ariniile), at No. 2, Norfolk-street, 'Z , trand, ` March, and recalls at the samo , h er To the Tyrian, for the recapture of the Gustava, on 1 4 ) rival in purl, and recalled at NO. 42, St. Mary's-stre et ' mouth. -------- .-----, • BIRTHS. . - ---; - - ,fs l ne v °tithe 4th inst. at Hanover, the Lady of Brigadier - 7 , Arthur Gore, of a daughter.:a p* On *Monday last, at Gnilsborougb Grange, North g; shire, the Lady of John Ward, Esq. of a daughter. . 6 . 0 0 1 On the r,-2.dillifi. in Clifford-street, ;fitly Carolinz>d le);„ of a dalighter. ' k , . 'MARRIED. - ' Or On the 21st inst. at Twiekerßiam, Captitin 111‘Pher s°-11 . ' fi t. Regiment, to Charlotte, youngest daughter of the 10-td4'. Peter Mut thwaite, B.D. Rector of the Parishes of r ue til- -t , 4 and NuueKam, Oxfordshire. nroits i to On Tuesday last, 'at Grave, 'Nottinghamshir7 e -- ,- 0 4, Volatiles Verm.n, - Esq.' 'son of the Atelishop of 3 Frances June Eyre, daughter of A. H. Eire, Esq. -,.._____,___ DIED., -- I O S ifl , On Tuesday, the 9th inst. at Witham-hill, near S''' jor e• 0 , Geo:le-William Johnson, Esq. in the 74th year a iii i 4 ''iir ° ,On the .15th iiipt. in Grosvenor•place ; Mrs. Lou" • wife of Willium Long Kiugsuian, Lig. firoO t.4 s ril lj On' Monday Morning last, at Beltert-Houteinea:"•• -- e Ith*,, j t after a shert illness, in the lith year o f h er age, I . i ; o eli;d Hon. Sophia Lady Brtvnlow. Her Lady,Lip he` the to li . . 0 daughter. of Sir Abraham Hume. Bart. and married- a fru Dr....villulv in July,-ISIO. She has left three childrel''. .ay - infancy, insensible oftheir irreparable loss. *, j o u- l ' j . Yesterday, in Parlp-lilace, St. James's, the Right k , or nifty Niarldiam. ' • - ' . . 0 014 At her house in , Hat ley-streeti Mrs. WalLer, rife G.:ncraL %Volker. ' L4-----..%-- "h r '- oe 7 Yrs'ann i tY, ST. -- MAuttLts.-liolida y at the Iv Bank, .and South Sea house.' _ ifs:~.. crO o ei LONDON . Printed by X. B. CARS:I'AIRS, No. I rOj i ,e l buddinzs ; amlpublished by W. A. SCRIPPS , 4) ; 00 0 ,,,i; at the Svs-OFFICE, No: 113, Strand; where ,d r ess o tueuts, Orders, Lettiers (postiraid),St.c. %must be ail F e 1 PI 4(~ . R, 5 44 f)'•d