The Sun. — London, England, 1801-12-03 00:00:00

• 'what they said, that the Captain had exercised on the Plaintiff a wanton cruelty, of which he was in- capable by his temper. John Davy, Chief Mate of the Dublinl was on board the Ship on her voyage homeward, when the Plaintiffeame on board. There 'were Soldiers on board, but I -cannot recoiled - how many-7-1)e --tween so and 4o I believe. Some of them were Deserters from the English legiments in •India; having attempted to go over to' Tippoo, and they were treated as Traitors to their Country. * They were, distributed in different Ships to come to Eng land, and we bad our share of them. They were not all of that description, but near to- the amount of 3o of them; --We had also some French PriSon-- ers on board ; six, I think, in number. . We had likewise some Invalided Sailors—As to Charter_ barty -:Passengers, all are' such- who ate" put 'on oard- by order of the Governor or Officer of the India Company, whether Soldiers 'or The Plaintiff was on board by 'order of the Governor at the Cape, and he was a Charter'Party Passenger. In the month of April, when the Plain. tiff was on board, I . remember very well a Sailor behaving ill upon deck. I believe it was on the oat of April. was called from my dinner, in consequence of a man behaving very riotously , and threatening to murder - his mess-mate with a knife. He was sent on the poop for his behaviour. The Captain gave me orders to - put him in iroos. I went on the poop, and .the man. was put in ,irons—fic was very abusive. ,He . damned - his Captain, and all the Officers on board. I left the poop at the time, there was then a Frigate, which was our Convoy, within bail of us. The man who ,was on the poop hailed the Frigate, and requested them to' send a boat and take him out of the Ship. I went off the poop and' endeavoured to quiet him. believe the Captain came upon the deck at that' time. - I saw him soon after ,on deck there was a great part of the Crew on deck. • The Captain repeatedly ordered them off: the Plaintiff was among them. The Plaintiff was the last • man who left the poop . . Ido not know how many times the Captain ordered them off, :but-it was:more than once, and the Plaintiff was the last. It was very necessary for the discipline of the Ship that the Captain should have so ordered.- This man made so loud a noise, - that I . could not help hearing 'bird. The. Plaintiff was ooing:down . the starboard side , Of the Ship; I think -_I spoke to him: His feet went; through the Venetiaivblind of the cabin. Ido not recolled'.whether.any of the Crew did - go down as . he d id. The Officers and - Cabin Passengers - go down on that side . ; but .it is not usual for inferior persons to go down on that side. I was very much hurt -at - the man in confinement behaving so riot.: ously. I ran towards him to' eneleavour to quiet' him again. I did, not see what the Captain did; nor hear what he' said to the Plaintiff rbut I'saw the Boatswain striking him with a - thing of this description [holding up: the pint]. was on the poop. I did, not hear any thing that was:said, ex- . cept that I heard the'PlaintifFtay,. "Lather away ; I will find back ;" as ncarly as 'I can reCrollea, these were the words, The Captain then,' . l. be lieve ‘A ordered the Boatswain - to go on with the punislnnent,"or "repeat MS blows." When the punishment was first infliacd, the Plaintiff was laughing ; he scented to' defy the - punishment. If he.. had shewn any Contrition, I - believe he'would not have had s" much. He seenied to defy the Pu nishment. • I was away from them about the same distance as frontine.to-the jury. On cross-exaMination this Witness said, 'he did not know .hoW . many blo the. Plaintiff 'received. This question was repeatedly put to him, but he said he did not know whether it: was more than 6 'or less than attention Was divided' by the riotous cooduabf•the man upon the poop ; he made 7no memorandtiin of this in his log ; he did not know whether:the Captain did or not; he bad no business. with, the Captain's 10g..----11e was not Con sulte4 as'an -Officer on the propriety Of - the putti'sh2 ment, i'toc did he ,believe any ether was. • It was, certainly fine weather, and a consultation might ha't'e been held, for the Ship sailed very smoothly. He gave,: no. account of any Mutiny-Whatever on 'board. Lyons, 'the- Bo;ttswain, , gave an account of the flogging which he inflifted on the Plaintiff, by orz der of . the Captain, in which, he •Si(l,- he did no more than his dirty..- He did not describe it,- how-. ever, in any way that differed 'essentially froni the account given of it by the Witnesses on behalf of the Plaintiff.. Mr. GAItiOW made an. able Reply, and called for very large Damages in this case,. which lie did riot hesitate to call the- very worst case of an assault and imprisontnent that ever was made the subje& of a Civil - AaiOn, and in which the Defendant ap peared to be a cruel, barbarous, and inhuman tyrant, • but the seasoti was come for him to discharge the reckoning, which the jury would be so good as to cast up between the parties.. , Lord KE NYox then delivered to the Jury a Very excellent Charge . . His Lordship began with observ_ ing, that causes like_the prcsent he .never-preSided ,at without . a great deal of real anxiety ; and: then proceeded . to say,ln.the first place, it .was abso lutely necessary, not only for.the welfare, but the existence of the commerce of this country, and all the naval force of this- country,. that discipline should be striuly preserved. 'For this reason, when any-inroad appeared to be made upon that principle, by any aftion against the Captain .o.r other Officer of His Majesty's -Navy or merchant ship, be ‘confesSed that his leaning, :and a strong leaning . ton, was in favour Of the Officer, and, al thought he Officer might have transgressed ,the. ex ad line of 'his ditty, yet he constantly advised Juries to be very tender in visiting such a trans . gression with large damages, because:he was of opinion" the true interests - of us all were best consulted When - snialt damages follow ed small -deviations' from stria propriety in these - caset. Yet this principle was to •be governed by certain rules. :} rote. different situations in life, and especially military and naval affairs, different duties arose. From inferior pertims, passive -obe dience to the commands of their superiors, not to question their judgment but to do that which they. directed, they being the most likely to know what direaions ought to be given, and they alone hay- LONDON Printed by At the SUN.OFFICIE, int, properly, the poVvet to give airealons ; and I because, otherwise, all the property, and every life on board, . might be in danger.--mouth was the duty ofinferiors. On the other on the part of the Captain or Commander on board a Ship, who was to issue his orders,. which must: be implicitly. obeyed, .there- ought to ,be protection, kiminess, and every thing else which conmasion dielates in the mind of a good man, towards those who are in leis power, as well as under his command ; but in such a situation there was often much difficulty, and where any, mistake arose in an arduous case, and the Captain or Officer went beyond.th&line of his dutV, he should never wish to be' severe on him for so doing—But here. the Captain put upon the Record, that Which, if proved, would be his justification— namely, that the. Plaintiff, in this Aftion . had, by his own , tumultuouS and mutinous condha, been the cause of what happened. to himself ; if he was so, most undoubtedly , hecOuld not' recover Damages, for no onetould be answerable to hirn, for thaeloss or damage which he brought upon himself.- Now the Jury would look at the evidence. In the first place there was no-doubt but the, Plaintiff had Made out his case in a way that called on the Defendant to make out his justification,, or else for considerable Damages.. In the next place, had .the Defendak made out that justification Which he had out upcin . the. Record Upon:that his Lordship declared he. found out no offence that the Plaintiff .had been guilty ()Cat al _nothing that even the Defendant's able and eloquent Advocate, had stated reached his Lordship's ear in the nature of a defence.: The Plaintiff ha&certamly suffered •vere• serious. injOry, and it . was at the hands of the Jury that lie now demanded damages' , for ..,rhat injury, and his Lordship thought they ought not to . be Small damages, but they should besuCh.as -were likely to deter others from such conduct} over those who were in their power, and to keep them within the lire of their duty, .for that was one way of preserving the subordination, the 'necessity of which the Defend_ ant appeared. to set up in his defeoceHlustice re quired- that the damages should be liberal in this case—hut when rhe Jury Were called upon for liberal damages, his Lordship could not advise them to . give any thing like what, might be called inflamed damages.; for passion should not out-run judgment , in such eases,Therne'asure he thought:hest adapted to the case, was that which wit die full length of a.. compensation ,to the 'injured party, and 'such as would, by its example, 'lend to the service: of the Public. In , doing . this,. the. Jury Would remember that the Defendant, however angry . • they might justly be with his conduEt, was not to be ruined for -this transgression, and although. his Lordship . did not .expel the Jury .to look upon this transgres sion, any more than. he did himself, as trifling., but that they would treat it-as a violation of duty, yet they were to remember, as they were men, the De fendant was a .rpap , also, who, although he might be hmade to smart for his' misconduft, was nevertheless not to he undone. The Jury would therefore - in their sober joagment, consider what damages they would give in this Case. . The Jury withdrew, and haVirig - remained' out of cobit'fOr about half an hour, brought in their Ver._ dita for !.he . Plaintiff, damages pool. Mr. ERSK r NE.—" They can give but 2001. for there are no more damages 'stated in 'the Dedaro tim." QARRO'W.—" I will . take the Verdia. - as it is, and see what we can make it."—The Verdict was entered for 5061. We stated in our j'aper of yesterday, ,that the adjournment day, the day on which the bitting!, commence before Lord IcENYON in Gui.(lhall, was next. Mond,ay. It was once so intended but in consideration of - Sonie causes wldch are expected to be long in Westminster, the Adjournment now stands for Tuesday. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. DEC'EMBER. 2. SITTINGS AFTER TE.7.1.11. VEAL* Z'. CoOMBS: This AtliOn was brought - by - 'the Plaintiff, who is a farmer residing in the neighbourhood of Har t row-on-theJlill, 'against the Defendant, who is like wise A farmer living :at Hayes near lixbristge,, to recover the sum of 201. which the Plaintiff had-paid to the Defendant for the purchase of at horse, .which was.warranted by the latter to be sound, and which it wac alledged on the part of the Plaintiff had. prove* insound, having become nearly. blind in the course of a few days . after the sale.., Several Witnesses were called on behalf of the Plaintiff, who proved that the horse had been sold by the Defendant to. the - Plaintiff on the i ith, Of OCtober last for zol. and had been warranted sound .by the former. They also proved, that. the horse had become unsound in the course of a few days af terwards, one of its eyes being .nearly closed, and. the other having a film . over the sight, so that the. horse could not see its kVP v. One 'of the Witnesses, Mr. King, who, had direaed his attention to the veterinary science for. fourteen or fifteen years past, and who'had examined the horse on the 25th of November last, said, the horse's eyes were affated by a considerable degree of inflammai froivand ,in one there was an 'incipient cataraa. He gave it as his opinion, that the' eyes of the horse could. not have been. thus affeeted on the zgth of. November. from any cause which did not exist previous to. the ith of Oaober, though it might not be shewn to common observation -by outward symptoms. He, was also of opinion, that the' situation -in which he found the horse's eyes could, not 'hay.e been.wholly caused by -external. violence, and that at any rake, if, any external violence, had. been used, . the. marks must have been visible, whilst in this case no marks.. of that kind were to be;discovered. • .• -- The Plaintiff sent the horseback to the Defend-- ant eight. days after the day 'on'which• it•came Into ' his possession. It was again sent back by. the De fendabt to the Plaintiff, who having refused to re; ceive it, the horse was sent astray,, and in that si tuation was iinpopnded by the:Lord of the Manor. It was admitted on the part of the 'Defendant; that the horse's eyes had become unsound subsequent. 4) 13U CHANA NI'MiLLAN, {of. , Bow-ktreet, covent,t,;ardvn) Nee 1 z, Strand ; where- ildwertiornents, Order.; . . , . the period when.it came into the Pds.sPsidti...ot the Plaintiff, but it was alleaged that the' defeAs which now appeared in the eyes of the - Boise arose from exrerpal violence whilst in the possession of the , Plaintiff, and that either a..kick or .a bite from an other hotseshad been the;sole cause of the arse - iie'• which appeared in its" ^eyes. That the horse•was perfediy sound at the time.rhe Defendant sOld'it to' the Plaintiff,' and.therefOrethat the former wai: not liable in this Adion. - • • Several Witnesses were called on behalf of the' Defendant, one of Whom was •a. farrier, nions relative to . the,conditiOn of the.horse'it.iari -oils times within a year past; were all in favour of the perfect soundness of the animal: "Tfiey . , like wise 'prOVed that the Plaintiff, upon the situation of the horse being remarked to 'him after its eye - S had become unsound, had attributed the crieumstance to . a kick or a - bite. _That he - had been at the D'efen:L ant's house on the Friday - after puraasiiiir, the horse, having it with him, and ~ :Ifilst it was in that situati on, without taking any steps in :the, buSiness, and that he had sent it back on the Monday, without calling in any, farrier or. person conversant with horses to examine it. Lord ALv briefly summed up the evidence:, observing,,thatthe only question for the ' - (l6cision of the Jury was, Whether the horse was really sound. at the time, it was sold, by the Defendant :to the Verdid for Defendant. OLD BAILEY. FIRST DA.Y.-WEDITESDAY, DEC. 2. THE'Sssions (the first in the Mayoralty JOHN EAmilz.) were opened • ir the uSnal form he_ fore. his . Lord hip, Mr. Jtisticc GROSE, Baroil GRAHAM the RECORDER, • 7oh:z f 7 ebb kl.ki Argton was charged with a capital offence. for feloniOusly_forging,:andcounterfeiting, and publishing .as true, .knowing it.'to.be forged, a certain Acceptance, purporting to be. that of .Sir James Esdaile, Hammett, and co, on a certain Bill of Eic.cliane, purporting ..to have peen drawn ,by ThOmas Davis, .and co. on Josep7h,.Broy,m,Pr,or der, for .the payment of, 241. at, two mmths aft7er date, and dated at Birmingham, Bth of . AuguSt, , r Sot, with intent :to .(kft.alid he leading - eircurristances of the case Were briefly to the folloWing effea!" 7 " It Pro- . secutor is. a shoe-maker in Si. GileSrs, 'and that the. Prisoner came ‘tp` . his . shop on . the 31St Of 'August, ,• and ordered such a • number of of shoes as' came to "91. 6s. He tendered' the instrainent scribed, in payment for the shoes,iincl - re . 4 , ..teste&tO . have the change; "the . Proseeutor' much Cash by • him, "went . aiid - pipc - urea • the change frorn'i neighbour, deau , ling - the tisuardis count. he Prisoner Oma:ricd in the shop till the • Prosecutor carne in; When he. n'aid'hiM dia'nke,:' It aPpeared 'that a person of therizitile of ae-- companied the Prikoner„ whom the'PrOsecutor hap:. pened to know, (a 'person of some - repute) and.Whiclr naturally induced Mr. Prosecutor, rot to suspo the prisoner. The shoes, 'WhieliTW'efe described to intended'-for 1 the Country 'l'm . de, were af!erivardS direaed to be sentto - theTArigel St. M,:trin'S-le.:o7and. The liri'sorier'fial* wa s intlO•rsd up(i . n the Bnl. Some:deail transpired in t h c *F A id et ,i t with roped .t . the,deli'very of. the some iriakiert . ti'lee, - but oihicl7 xv;;s very, inaterial to the' case ~: In a' df;y the Prisoner ti7e - shoe's; and laid the Proeeutor, sonic exi%!uo;.;"s. which had - been incurred with 'respea to the ileliCieri Of 'the goods, in the It further appeared' that on the .!oth of Septem_.. bcr the :Ptisouer eaine again . to the shop • Of the Prosecutor and or lered ,p,inTity of shoes; which he undeobd isroni . the Pri;oner Li intend ed for the African-trade, when he prehented ansiliLt Bill for - ,i51,.'f0u the payment of them. Not . havi . n'i; the change, he desiredhim 'to leaVe the cot sequence . of rc Moll it franspireei on inquiries made by the . PtosecOtor,, ib t the, Bill iv . as forged. The Prisoner cane the next day for . the 'change of , the Bill, when he was told was `a bad one on :WhiCh the Prisoner inanifestcd but no..cOnflision,' nor any thing fi:4n 'which guilt could', 'be inferred: He said he received it from a respea able' quarter in BirMinghaM, and assured the Prose-, cutor he shbuld be indemnified for any losS lie Might' 'suWer bY'thi! trans'aelion. On . the'discovery -being' made willi respea to the second Bill "-tendered by the PriSbneri.an 'inquiry was set on fo6C.With spell to the first Bill; and which 'was the 'subjeel of the present in(lidtpept. Application was made at :the libuSe of Esdaite:ana Co-:, When was that their aceeptaice 'upon the - Bill . was forged..' These circiiinstance . sa ppe.::Cred in evidence. " The Prisoner tool - one object on with . respea to evidence, namely that was not the firsi might have be.en brOu'ght rfor . Lvard. One of - the' Cletks, who was . in the habit off regulating ceptances theCOmpan . 3',.beihg - Callo.;,..l'nd not one of the Partners. 'However, • the Couit'''Seenied of opinion that the evidenee 'addueed . was adequate' to establish the' fall of the - aev.ptance being . forged. The PtisOner iti his :defence alledgcld the leas in question as paid to tun`liy one Carter; at wilt) had been in his 'debt... •He stileMnly protested that he imagined.the of to be good ones, 'and of course his innocenceOf any tention to &fraud; and it appeared; thOugh not dire/11)i . ) in 'the - Course of the ei,iden‘je, theft the Party from whom the Prisoner•alledged'he had re ceived the Bill could not be found.' • • On evidence to the 11.)peeffek'..i, the Jury were • induced to bring in a •verdia of .Not The Prisoner was charged a second time, respell to the Bill - for 151. alove'nientioned, but as the evidence to be brought forward wa.'precisely the same as in the foregoing Ca's,e, the Court deem% ed it unnecessary to go into it, in consequence of which a formal verdid of AcquittiV was pronounced. Pri ?afield was accused. , of a similar pf, fence, in forging, &c. a, certain JnStruinent,. put- ~- Otitatig to be a sill of Exihinge, 'drawn by Jon i. ti 'n Lees; az:Ntiicheste4 on lohn :Ruggles' f 4 the payment, of 241..._D05. i ,at..tw0 months after date, Itc,; with intent to. defraud lames Coe. The eirctunstaaeS which transnire,frinevidenc e on this case, (which teok 'Up the ....ttention,of. the Court a considerkible out liinits - 113 4(4 allowus to recite; , htit—they • were that ,natpte As upon the whole to induce. the lur,y.:co.4,:pt Prisoner. . • • Thomai Dripsworth was charged with c4>ital offence, in "felon iously stealing in the dweltingi' ;41otik of Rich.. Sinittionds„ cpsi&of; brandy, .v4l -.4 41., his property,.,. . • . After a short deliboraifon upon tF:e evidence 4 this case;' the. Jiity brought in .a 'yenta of-miVor Guilty. .;, .. ~ , CaEpttotc.,—We beg . leave _to cprre& a mis statement in our Paier some time ago, in which ‘‘'c said tliat a Most merahelloly circumstance had taken place in that town; between two Gentlemen; respdt ina the remnval.of a tree, when, the course of the dispute, one of the. Gentlemen struck the other with (a large stick upon. the head . , plid lie iitt,?;;/ . t . /y cxpiii ed, and that .the Gentleman had sin& absecnded.---- -The fads, as they-are correded by our Correspon detit in that 'fawn, are these: - the two n:' met upon the spot where the tree stool,. to ascertain their riglu to., the tree ; they -quarrelled,,.fougl%,".. with their : sticks, which w.pre ,not large, .but 6 1,10 as they usually . rode with, and one of them, ‘truW,t defending himself from the' assault of his antagonist , siruck the other ors - the head; a blow which is sup' posed to, have occasioned his .death, : he3.lid n ot, however, die instantly, fortnight after wards and although.the survivor al)sconded at the time, he did not,do.so'with a View.to.avNid a judicial investigation of the affair, but bas.givennotiee 'to the Coroner, that he shill appear and take his'trial at the ensuing Assizei. MANSION - HOUSE. - Tuesday 70seph Mealy Benjamin jacist, - alias. Coturei,* liorget , and several :others, mere again brought befpre t!tz Lotto MA , OR, charged with desperately cutting • and ,wounding Junes JacksOn, a Carrn'an . to. Mc.' Travers, of Qtleen-street, - Cheapside. Mead solicited-..-his , .I,9rilship.. to adniitte4 a King's Evidence, ,anci, he would te i ll the truth ; which . being done, he have a - t - ult.acconut self and the prisone: yi , Ath sivehthothers, together on Wednegclay night, the ber, and meeting the tinforttirtzte man near the 01' of Grub-street : upon his resistin:to - be. robbed lic was -.very much - cut \viih a_knife 'the Prisoile. r Jackson, ,a/iartona - ek, COTIfe - ssed he had eat". ,; across the' Vey, - arid rui'd been . the -The City saidf- that . tsey 'With LUC • Assiskants,... had made every e*ertipn to tijscog r these depredators ;ant likewise told' his 'LordshiP the- p66r hat been sndangerouqy .. Wdunct ed wits 'in danger---The,J.,t) b M A np, :orderez.l. them all ,(') be remanded for further exainination,Jill they shouS See whether the Inan'ilecOvered or not. S IP NEWS. ; and Vublished by W11.1.,1Am .4xtbltoF.l , SCR trps, (of Ijorse-ferry-roud, Westminster; ; Fur the Papr, Letters for the Edi t or, Btc, uost4aid),. must addreblied, . • ' -Y . 44 . (14:M0Trr if, t DEC. I. • t Arrived - ---the Marla, _Bennett, from Norway. •(;11(.!4,, for. the Streigh-ts ; Tonse aco' in ts , Reius,,. for 4: Niaria, 'Von C.nninga, 4( ..; ronevv.: l, , fir Antwerp ; Conius,- 'kti:aller, for. Liverpool ; •ILL• 1071 Dcarv; Bee; Wallis- ;. 'Aai - ve, Conyers, and.lsa4ila,i.ca lr ' for London. . • ' • :: -. .. . . . MARRIEP., ' . - • - . • . , pn %Vednesday se'vniOt, at. Euston, Lord* r rancis SP L7I . ,c 7 et-, second son Of the Duke of NI afthorAit, to Lady Fr'ariv- ~ Fitzroy, fifth daughter of the Duke of.c.Wfton. - % ' • - - •• • Yeg.erday. tnorntg, tjq. , ; On the 28t.11 urt: -at the Barracks in Windsor, Ensign. Woolriate, of the„Stitfroirße — girrmt, -aged 21 year'' ..SOl . . , . PRICE. OF STOC" ES, YESTERDAY. ,_ " 1 Bank Stock . ErOo ' India Stock .. :.,.. 3, .• - - Navy. 5 . per .Cent. 1991 too 2- Exclieq: 13if Is "s. Es.: - pr s rfi' 5 cief Cent. 1797, 9 siiit Fundable (raw . :pregs., i i,ish 5 tier C:.:„,r,t. , - , -Ney S. S. Stock, .- ~ . .4 per Cent.'Con...Bsl . 41-i ; - 1,.3 per Cent. i 75 t-, . ,• ,' 3 Ver Cent. Red. tab _7 ,Otnnitint . • . , per Coat. Con. •iitut Iniper, 3 per .Cent. 661 Ditto Serifi' ": - ; ; ' 1)1R° Ann. , I 2 4.46 Bank Long, Ann. 19ii 11:inic for Account , Ditto Short Ann. 5,1- India for Account • Ditto Scrip - --- -G*Hisals for Open. !Ht .... ." ---' FOIINTA IN INN, and I.PO,SX—HOUSE, CAN r- r°' ' • BURY. • .., , , ........_ _ . . • ..... , . . , -7.W.II_ILIA:\I" M1T......:. F 6, speafti!ly- re turns • ,t 0 • grateful tilarrksi'to: - the , Nobility:, t;entry„ - PP: . it i to Ptihlic - •..i .:-.-, :i. '. , • •-,- the ilivolit they 11.-e:e been piO'' 4 l . , ir ul collier ~:, ~...,,..;, ~..., .: :1-ippy iiii.this op , [icrtullify to pied pc them - cc. Ile stlll continues ip, the wove lnii ; ‘0 1 .! .. ti , 0 36 truits ti , lie shall ex,peitence a iartilei coliCuitrance ot . , a ua Favo.tir , I , 'lliC rl tiloY h4Y. ,5 41t1.14t0 so liberally', h- ':. l . 4 ,4' aviiiell it aviii b,... at ;ill fillies his uunnst cutLavoUf vv. - 1- :-- an,,..:.1:;1tre. ' • • , - - . - ', - . -• k,. " I oc , A N i,.*:;:t . i.:%.lacli to I..ondmi every.e.:gning„avEight 0 ..` - ', 'l l ll, !\'',.ati-co‘ieli lo'l.ondoti eyery everliog at Nine o'`:`, • Q..7l4fe?'il• I) . l''.iiAlenc.V.Cer'l 4- aliv'f6l:iytTNlii..adtt. DON'''''' • • , , : ~, 0 qr)- 0 - I .t'Ai4V..s:alikfloQii.l;o4 4s • - -----: -- - - , - L' o'4. 1' , .,r the P.I& L .:., I.: itV AT ff./N...and DFALi T ll.l 1 N G , • :11:, E , Tll..ild t; li Noi S. - ' • .1.0 - .' M R ' . SIC:INIOND,-. StitgeDgpllentist,--.Batill. lA , , '11;c --louogr.t..3iii„),;-;p4llo>loilitv, , ,,G,entry , .. 4 ' l4 l,.ok. Friend's, tifaf for ti, better -..“..;.oinitc6:lation ii"siul 4 it i : 'the hi wi,,tri lit% wily t t's:.lll-y 'aiii4"t:chea.:Efeliariti"on'il6 slid 5.3 ,01 - `''' I.foilit , !:_ht Ile 1'01142 - 'l/ till; Aents.tu•Lon4on4,it. , the ' 'sale tit4t.t 41' Talr. Hattie, Nd: c 2.. •.,;.t2V: Bo,t! 1 --.stt,t . ;.-. 1 4t-i Nv ail s ' Ibrflt inist, Ni,.. 4-,'S - 51 - rand - :Arr'. Irclti.;Ut 4l kro • **•." ' 11 "' .0 1 ' ) - , 4 , - -- • V Ito, i hill. ; Sir .• 'C;S'et, No.' 68,:: Coeithilr;': Air:: Bojton , otw, • Exchange ; ',lnd -at iiit , .t of die 1 rincip4S:i4ol)s.tiirPlig ' r i s England,. kelaittl;'.Sccu!,l,o - ,0, iiiiti WalCs; : • :... . a... , i..; 40,1' - Mt: tlt;.':110N a is 1.--p- v 3, in ,-..,-* 4 , , , , Oil.' ditfrtt`tt ler.' • and....bc.:- - ;4lsl , piadtled4••=in - ultittli time !L 'og ii,os.consfant .if tend..4.the. first Nobikity,6,t the.Upited .6.i.vf,„tt0n14._..,, 1 1- 1, -' o j variably selecied,higre4lent_ ~s iir . o . y - c4 liy - 1p..; ...:)ep - .' ,1 1F 1 ',`"`* 0 47 4 , pradie..al W6 , lerya?isrus - , 4 *fd"be. thri -iiiosi'ecitt-fluetlEfar r . ' li r; ,‘ mg the I .Feet.h.and - Ga.ittu,- atici.;ii-ving ;ben) 'Thai44 ~ 4 11! tfal m4-4e.. F .pti i AO-Alesirab let 4 e.x .i gy,.pffson itA iii.i •r,..1itt..411,vit liiin mut: pleasure` Lo conirnitnicatd - to the ri:itil":. l :,‘,A the f u llett4tOnfidence l ,-thrtt,' - lii;-ThrifilaieN l4 ; l4 '! --I ,r - 1 1 / 1 ., • being used accotding . acccktpplis . it and.etrect every . - purpos4,retpi..ifed; aus. l -"t',./ : .lt*'; i -t9 ;tis, p Tillie& dlreetiort,s...,- 4 .;,'.. 1 0 ',,y 1 ,(1 prevent. Z.fle.ilatarly any • colititgftit thereof,' 1-fis , - (6 - ',l li:is:been graCion;ly- p I elied ' tO '.l.int'H es-Royal ' IM l Lt e qil II tent, kir ; the .ably .I? rep -orations, entitled, tlie.Sig,i,o,N,Jl IMPERIAL IIgI\ITLEkICE 'avid' I' It E S.T.ltt , i ,„ s d. l 1..01 1 10,N. Also liis - Tpetli Brillies - or ailleteiff . v, „pri‘ texture, on the best adapted' cionstruction„,arqt,aie:". fv, .witit his . Patent labels. ... - ~.: -,. , • 'or tY. , -' N. 13, Orders sent to either of the aboveAgeitts- „,ly honse, Noy s; 'Edgar.-builtlirg4, - ' will be '111111 . 14 3 ' ~..- tended to. . • _,....,,. .. . , -..-. - . ::.• . - ..... ...,/' Bath.,P4. , I, ro,t. - - - - e' r ;' , ~~ Nj;~~i3Eil THE: ' O A 3ctcrint ako vt•tr,. disc 'lira oil ANL. on 7rUeSdi/3 '41 %114111W 1/ 0 11 Wei.bleSl LAnd can Thi "r the first tii THEAI tro_mc KAT s on Monda 41ng Richard h• huh they c; . ant of a Nt t tfor aS toric ce at this _ Thurs 4 i~dk.adies and and eiSn: LL Pe t i of SYI Countv c to ' his the Arms Forrnoon ;7 1 sed will b le.:Lcovcry , 1., 4 t to the ar ' l c said 14th County iir,t l =y ;it La 4 ce in Sit, , t ;,` tne sari win bi A . POW esixtTi g-Cro'ss. TIETEEV of an est End 0 :t l vt )° , e .. dp it t Martin'; To t ' r&ITRGI • k V f.ZS 4%,,,_ 11 ed by hi lames tor ~,c s q Steaks f ., . 1 : Y -ch uc. finvcntoi t h name. y II IY Shop: o . 4 .wns in El z t rraciesrni u t r Ved. with rich is ru. 4 1-ee ani to i tI:: 10.13. No c110%,13' les, vim LEASE a %), the Pre Eravdon, 1 -1 1 - 1 E I 11( Feb 411Ti t ' 1 ,1 t r4 'e, in t th the Non 4 e 'flock:To 2 .2 :Wit , e TCna'n. Vol Terri (I zsession 0 be vie of the. ki:rsoN tRINI woc 13 ,.“, est ~e rence . a tior Li 1 1 "'QP e , tt , Aytes A~tzrb o rbury, b 1,2r3 ll ' • Riasi I. l l'steack ; trQi,ant Mort 1; 13 , 4 ;Cil c,kham, 14 tt o , i Nc 41 ; 44441 g.; -.lllDixtri I1 4r(114 113a I , 4'rctic. Et, p'etriat e4c Ch'Partx • 141• St ~_ ~~+ ~•` `