The Sun. — London, England, 1814-07-18 00:00:00

RnM ttve LONDON GAZETTit, JULY 16. Queen's-Palace, July 14, 1814, , • This day his Excellency the Count Delachitstre, Ambassa llor from his Most Christian Majesty Louis XVIII. and, Mr. ';dinned flotn : ke, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister I'leni potentiarY from hiS Majesty the , ls.ing of Denmark, had their fsyst private audiences of her s. loA3esty; to which they were in , trodoced by the Earl of Morton, her Majesty's Lord Chambef - - lain, and conducted hyßobertChester, E51...-Issi§tant-Mast'er vf,the Ceremonies. . • •Foreig►t-Qfcr? f luty-16,18 I 4 - . His Royal Highness tilt Regent has.):)een - pleased, in the name and on the behalf of his Majesty, to appoint .lo= lefish Charles -Mellish,- Esq. to be his Majesty's Agent: and Cu.►sul in the Circle of Lower Saxony and the Free Cities of Hamburgh, Bremeo, and Lubeck. Doziming-street, Jret q 14, 1814. His Royal Highness the Prince kegent has been pleased, in the name and' on the behalf of his llitjesty,..to appoint Henry M‘Donni . ll, Esq. to be his Majesty's Agoit and Con sul-General at Algiers. BANKRUPTS: . • JOse.pb Francis Burge and Matthew King's-Arms= bitidings, Wood-street, hOSiers, to surrender July August 2, 27, at eleven, at Guildhall. Attorney; Messrs. Sweet and Stokes, Basinghall-stroA. Samuel Edwards and William Brown Edwards, Stamford, LincOlnshire, and Uppingliam, Rutland, - bankers, July V, at four, 23, and August -27, at eleven,at the George lnii, St. Martin's, Stamford-Baron, Northamptonshire._ Attor - nirs, Mr. Torkington, Stamford, or .Mr. Gasket', Gray's- . San, London. Abel Wallord I3ellairs, Stathford, Lincolnshire, and James Bellairs, Derby, bankers, July 22, at four, 23, and August 27, at eleven, at , the George Inn, St. Martin's, t;tameord- Baron, Northamptonshire. Attornies, Mr. Torkington, - Vallack, East Stonehouse, Devonshire,ifour factor . August 13, 13, and 27, at twelve, at Weakley's . Plymouth-Dock. Ittornies, Messrs.Darke and Church, Princes-street, Bedford-ruin, or Mr. Frederick Bozon, Ply- mouth-Dock Charles Wright, late of -Charles-street, Soho-square, uphol sterer, July 19, 26, and August 33, at twelve, at Guildhall. Attorney) Mr. Howell, Symond's-Inn. Matthew Lovenbary, Weston., Sotnersetshire, victualler, July 29, 30, and August 27, at twelve, at the Greyhound Inn, Bath. Attornies, Messrs. Clalke, Bath, or Messrs. Sandys, Horton, and Roarke, Crane-court, Fleet-street. Wilfrid Wilson, late of liawkesdale ' _Cumberland, dealers August 3,4, and 37, at eleven, at, the King's-Arms, Car lisle. Attornies, Nessrs. Monnsey and Fisher, Staple-Inn. John Lamb, Stockport, Ceahire, cotton-spianerfrAugust I, 3, and r, at eleven, at the Castle-Inn, Stockport. Attornies, Mr. i%addeley, Stockport, or Messrs. Milne and Parry, Temple. - • William Posberry, late of Liverpool, Lancashire, and Richard Bamher, Publin, merchants, July 29, 30, and August 27, at eleven, at. the. Bull Inn, Liverpool. Attornies, Mr. Woods, Liverpool, or Mt:srs. Blackstock and Dunce, Temple. William Barnard, Boston and Skirbeck, Lincolnshire; ban ker, August 11, 12, and 27, at &liven, at the White Hart Inn, Boston. Attornies, Mr. Holloway, or Mr. Itudgerson, Boston, Lincolnshire, or Messrs. Exley, Stocker, and Da v- ton, Furnival's-li.bi • Thomas Lawrence Barnard, Boston and Skirbak-Quarter, Lincolnshire, banker, August it, 12, and 2 7, at eleven, at the White. Hart Inn, Boston. Attornies, Mr. Holloway or Mr. Itodgerson, Boston, Lincolnshire, or Messrs. Exley, Stocker, and Dawsuni Furnivars-Inn. James Whittam, Preston, Lancashire, spirlb.dealer, August 10, 11, and 27; at eleten, at the White Horse Inn, Pres ton. Attormes, Mr. Blakelock, Serjeant's-Inn, Fleet st.,e+ or Messrs. Pilkington and Son, Preston. Daniel Williamson, Liverpool, picture-dealer, August 1,2, aria 27, at mu., at the George Inn, Liverpool. Attornies, Messrs. Crump and Lodge, Liverpool, of Mr. Battye, Chan- Cery-latie. George Sidgreaves, PrestOn, Lancashi re, cottrin-Manufacturer, August 10, 11, and 27, at one, at the White Horse Inn, Preston. Attornies, Mr. Blakelock, Scrjeant's-Inn, Fleet atreet, or Messrs. Blanchard and Bickerstaff, Preston. 301 th Hughes, King-street, Wapping, victualler, July -23, 30, and August 27, at ten, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Whittons, Great James-street, Bedford-row. J, and J. Conabes, Shadwell-dock, coppers, July 23, 30, and August-17, at twelve, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Loaley and SOLI, Cheapside. S. Beazeley and M. U. Neise, Parliament-street, Westminster, army accoutrement makers, duly 19, 30, and August 27, at ten, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Hillyard and King, Copthal. court Throgmorton-street. J, Gaskarth, Oxford-street, linen-draper, July 23,- 30, and • August 27, at ten, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Kersey and Spar, Bishopsgate-street. • J. Wllite, Windsor Terrace, city-road, merchant, July 23, 30, • and August 27, at ten, at Guildhall. - Attornies, Messrs. Sweet and Stokes, Basinghall-street. J. tasden, Bush-lane, Canori-street, bricklayer, - July 1 9, 2 6 , and August 27, at eleven, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Broughton and Newbon, Alderinary Church-yard, Bow lane. W. Hodson, Playhouse. yard, Whitecross-strect, paper-stainer, July 23, 30, and August 27, at ten, at. Guildhall. Attor ney, Mr. Addis, Park-street, Westminster. DIVIDENDS. . Aug. 11. A. B. Crooke, Colne, Lancashire, calico-manufac turer, at eleven, at the Dog T a vern, Manchester—Aug. 9. W. Fisher, Canihridi,e, ttoollen-draper, at ten, at Guildhall, London—Aug. 8. C. Downward, Liverpool, roper, at one, at the York Hotel, Liverpool — A u g . 17. It. M ' Clure, Manches ter, merchant, at eleven, at the Bridgewater Arms, Man chester, Aug. 15. J. Barnett, Bire,ingham, paratuut-maker, at eleven at the Swan Hotel, Birmingham — Aug. 6 . W. Nicholls, , Piccadilly, linen-draper, at one, at Guildhall— Aug. 6. A. L. Boulanger, Vine. street, Piccadilly, merchant, nt one, at Guildhall7--Ang. 8, C. Russell, Bath, brush-maker, at twelve, at the Rummer Tavern ' U. D. Tubbs, Liverpool, merchant, at two, at the King's Arms Inn, LiVer •pool—Aug: 6. J. Worral, Warrington, flourdealer, at twelve,• at the i\ag's Head Inn, Warrington—Ang. 2. G. Simpson, Copthall Chambers, London, merchant, at ten, at Guildhall— Aug. 30. W. Haadeuck, Marchtnont-street, -,Russell-square, furnishing-ironmonger, at ten, at Guildhall —Aug. 27. Row ley, Saw-lane, Cheapside, warehouseman, - at ten, at Guild -2- 0. J. Feat herstonhaugh, St. Mary- at -Hill, Lower Thames-street, coal-factor, at one, at Guildhall—Aug. 13. G. Bodle, Alfriston, Sussex, grocer, at eleven, at the Star Inn, Lewes—Aug. 9. W. Nayler, Sheffield, Yorkshire, fell munger, at eleven, at the Commercial-inn, Shefiield—Aug. 13. J. Jones, Bear-street, LeiCester-fields, man's-mercer, at ten, at Guild hall—Aug. 9. L. Jaymoud, South Audley-street, Gros venor. square, milliner, at ten, at Guildhall—Aug. Is. It. Hewsun, It. Higgin, and J. Hett, Isleworth, calico-printers, at ten, at 'Guildhall, London—Aug. 23. J. Nodin, Water lane, merchant, at twelve, at Guildhall—Aug-20. B. Lin thorne, Walbrooa, and J. H. Jolliffe, Crewkerue, Somerset, DlCrchants, at one, at Ciatia6,,it, 12. it. An thony, Plymouth, grocer, at twelve, at the Royal Hotel, Ply- Mouth---' Aug. 10. J. Bele, Plymouth, ironmonger, at tai•elve, ut the Commercial-inn, Plyinouth—Ang. S. W. and J. 'Thorn ton, New Malton, Yorkshire, Coal-inerchants, at three, at the Sun-inn, New Malton—Aug. 6. It. Guthrie and J. Cooke, Li verpool, merchants, at two, at the King's Arms-inn, Liverpool ...Actg. 13. S. Carter, Wood-street, Cheapside, glover, at eleven, at Guildhall—Aug: 9. J. Clark, Chatham, linen-dra per, at ten, at Guildhall, London—Aug. 13. E. Mann, - Yeovil, Somesetshire, linen draper, at eleven, at Guildhall, London,- Aug. 9. T. Marris, Barton-upon-Humber, and It. Nicholson, Glaniford-Briggs, Lincolnshire, bankers, at ten, at Guildhall, Loralon-L-Ang. 13. 'l'. Kennedy, Woolwich, tavern-keeper, at 11, at Gui What! . Aug. 13. G. Heather, Curtain-road, timber 3nerchant, at eleven, at Guildhall—Aug. 6. J. 'l'. Cooper, Chester-place, Kennington, apothecary, at twelve, at Guild hall, LoadonL—Ang. 6. W. Luke, It. Whitehall, and H. Jen kins West Smithfield, wholesale linen-drapers, at o ne , . at Guildhall. . . . ERTI FIC ATES—A G 6. ' • J. Porsdick, Daley-terrace, City-road, builder—B. 'Phony son.,Whitc llorie 1,111, Fetter-lace, coach proprietor—J ..Brook, Leeds, eaomet , inalter—J. li. ltidley, Widgeon-hill, Leomin ster, farmer—J. Halmarack, Newcastle-under-Lyme, mercer Chef, Aston, 'Cheshire, draper-,-S. Southey, Bristol, painter—C. liedpath. Gower-street, St. Paucras, painter—J• Ford, Liverpool, builder.—J. Field, Plyinouth, merchant—J. .Larltwurthy, horn -manufacturer. • y.ARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. T. Blyth; tirliVett, and C. Wielder, I,iniebouse,-.-Middle sex, wliartingers -- W. Hinds, H ar li ngton, an d G. Watkins, M aldlesex, beick enaleers.o4lfield and W. Turner, %lien-street, masons—C. kar and 13. I'd d, Noe-toile -street, St rand, milliners—it. Eng land and C. Feartile:‘,y, " Upper Thames -street., porter- iner cteents—W. Wright ar, S. Lroughall, Lit3lc Carter-lane, London, brokers—J. A. G. Oliveira and J. S. DcFrancp, Wal bruols, London—d.. Darling tend W. Main u, Linee-streci ,Lon don, citeesetuongcrs:—T. Edwards, 1 . . L. Edwards, audJ. Sur- . rage, Brist.ol, wholesale lioes2-drapers. LSW INTtLLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERt,.Jutx 16 The LouD CHANCELLOR; in giving notice this day that he should sit at an earlier hour than. usual on Tuesday, observed that though he had for the present Sessions finished hiS attendance in the House of Lords, for the purpose of hearing appeals, ; yet as it was the intention of their Lor& ships to gi►e judgment in such appeals as bad been heard, he should stilt require the mornings of . Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, to arrange 'such judgments as he should be called upon to prononnee.—Mr.AG NH trusted, that if his Lord ship.could advance any of the appeals, it would be the Manchester Tythe Cause, .which had now been delayed more.than ttp.7te years. His Lord ship said he should adhere to the determination he had already stated, not to take, any thing not of its regular course. He had been asked to ad vance the hearing of the exceptions in the case'. of Mr. Macnaniara. Why that case had been set dOwn berate him instead of the Vice'Chan cellor he was at a loss to conjecture. He could neither advance that or any other cause, and he was more particularly induced to abide by this determination, as he understood! he should have .to • hear upwards of Five ,Hundred Bankrupt Petitions. : . LADY FRANCES VANE TEMPEST (an Infant) BY HER. NEXT FRIF,ND, V. VISCOUNTEtS OF ANTItIM and JOHN 'GAVE, Eq. Mr, HART moved that the defendant, the Coon tess of Antrim, might be vilowed to enter on the estates of the late Sir Harry Vane, Tempest, Bart: she, as his widoW, having a right to an annuity of 8001. per annum,, which were charged on the estate, and which time receiver had not paid her. Mr. LEACH opposed the motion, on the ground that the Countess of Antrim was executri'l? to the late Sir Harry Vane Tempest, and after his death bad received some of the rents, which she had not accounted for; hi - s client was ready to pay the annuity, if her Ladyship would account. - Mr. HART, in reply, said that the Countess of Antrim had maintained the infant ever since the death of her late husband, and that was a sufficient reason why she had not accounted. The - Loab CHANcr.uoR directed, that the par ties should go before the Master, and a proper ac- Count be. taken. In the same rause Mr. HART moved, on the part of the Countess of '.Autrim, that his Lordship would order the sum of 3151. to be paid to her for the rent of a house which she had taken last year for the infant. It having been thought necessary that Lady Frances should have an establishment of her own, the sum had been approved of by the Master.---Motion granted. JOHN NORRIS V. COLONEL THORNTON. The plaintiff and defendant in this case had en tered into an agreement for the purchase. of a ma nor within the parish of Withypool,. in the county of Somerset. The bill prayed that the defendant should be compelled to abide by his contract. The estate in question was - sold . to Cokinel Thorn-, ton (the celebrated sportsman), nearly three years since, for a sum of 7,5001. of which sum he had paid a deposit of 20001. and agreed that the remainder of the purchase-money should be paid over on the 3d of May, 1812. The present bill was filed on the 29th April, 1813, by which it appeared that the property was sold ; subject to the existing leases, it being a reversionary property. The defendant, in his answer, admitted the sale and purchase, and the execution of the ne cessary writings ; But he contended that the value of the estate had been overrated, for that it had • been represented to him that timber to the amount of 5001. was upon the estate,, but he could not discover more - than halt that amount, and further, that he was by promise (after the bargain) enti tled to a hogshead of Claret ! TheSe two latter cir cumstances, ,he conceived, violated the agree ment. Mr. HALL was heard for the plaintiff, and Mr. ROUPELL for the- defendant. The latter gentle man observed, that he had expected his client to lead in propria personc-e. His Honour then, adverting to the real merits of the case,- observed, that the defendant was bound, by the terms of the written contract, to pay the whole .of the purchase money, on the 3d of May, 1812. The plaintiff prayed that he, having paid a deposit of 20001: should be com pelled to pay the remainder, with interest from that date, and directed his decree accordingly. . - . At this moment Colonel Thornton calue into Court, and begged the attention of his Honour. He stated, that had intended to plead his own cause, and came now to state a few facts. Be said be lived in a county where it was his object to collect a large quantity of land ; that the present manor was offered for his acceptance ; that. be lieving his then attorney to be a gentleman.; he was induced to make the purchase upon his - re presentation, and that of a clergyman. Their honours he could not, nor did he suspect: That believing every thing honourable, he invited the parties.to dinner. After the glass had circulated-, money was pressed for, - and he gave a dn.tft for 12001. not wishing to think every man roguish -; that finding him (ColonelT.) liberal, more money was pressed for, when having asked some goes- dons, such as, if all was right, and if, the wood was really on the estate, IA! was assured that it was, and worth five hundred pounds, that he then made the advance or deposit of 20001. .However, when he came to inquire, after executing the writ ings, he found that he had been deceived ; that instead of getting 500/. worth of wood, there was scarcely a stick, and that the son of the plaintiff, in consequence, of his liberality in advancing 20001. had promised him a hogshead of claret, but no claret was forthcoming ; . that the rents amounted to about 1001. a- year only; .that lie bad not re ceived a shilling of the profits or rents, and in short, that he was actually. paying 7,5001. for nothing. The money was in Court.. The proposition which he now meant to submit for the approbation of the Court, was, he hoped, a very fair one, name ly, that the money should remain in Court until be had received the rents, and that.the Court would enable him to act. If not, he must s a y, that he should.be pretty well juggled out of his 7,5001. The VICE-CHANCELLOR, who listened to the Colonel's well-delivered speech with attention, observed, that the Court could only take cog niiance of the pleadings and evidence in the He (Col. T.,- had not exairined' a witness in it, though it had Areen before the Court since Aptll, 1813. All that could nor he done was to_ take tare that he should receive the rents and profits. He must "recollect that be had bought the estate with his eyes open. if he suspected the plaintiff 'had received the rents from May, 181.2, then the Court would give the Colonel redress. Colonel Thornton observed, that be was placed. in a very awkward situation; suppose the tenants should die insolvent. Ile was perhaps one of the weakest men alive in regard to suspicion, and if the law was against hint be did hope a court of equity would give him relief, and soften the harshest parts of the, law. - The VICE-CHANCELLOR replied, that a Court of Equity could only proceed upon what was proved in evidence. If the Colonel had any proof to offer, he had passed the opportunity by lying idle. Colonel Thornton observed, that all then that remained for him to do, was to put up-with the loss- of 7,500/.. and retire ; and he immediately bowed to;the Court and retired. cciußT OF KING's BENCH, JULY 16. THE KING V. HANNAM. -This was an information filled by the Attorney- General against an Attorney, for a conspiracy, with divers persons .unknown, falsely to obtain the appointment of a person 'of the name of. Bar low as Assignee under a commission of bankrupt cy issued against Mr. Coltman, of Long-acre, thereby to get the bankrupt's estate into his power. The principal witness was Mr. Barlow, who described himself as a Surgeon and Medical Electrician, residing near the: Asylum ; he said lie had been acquainted with the defendant five years,. and was upon the occasion in question summoned by him to the Guildhall Coffee-house, where, after breakfast, the - defendant introdneed him to Mr. Coltman, and then led him to.Guililhall ; he there gavehini a piece of parer avith'the letters " 1. U. /J.: 2001." u,,on it . the witness did not under stand the weaning of it, and upon its being ex phinekby the defendant, told him he owed him nosuch - nioney the defendant did owe him some thing upon a running account between them. The note was then torn ; and the defendant put a se curity for the same ststn into the witness's hands, which, he said, he bAng a-lawyer, could not prove under the bankrupt's estate, and .requtsted the wit ness to do it fur him. The witness being, as he said, an innocent, believed this, and consented to do so, provided no. oath was required from bins. The de fendant pledged his honour to the witness, as a .brother mason, that there was none, anti that it. was what was done every day. The defendant then took the witness before the Commissioners of Bank rupts., where he signed a paper. , He. said to the defendant, " now I hope you have led me into no error." The defendant laughed, and said it was a very common thing, and that there was no harm. in it. The witness heard his name called, and 'went up to the table the same as others. 'l'lle 'Cononissioner, Mr. Elijah Impey, held out the book, and three or four took bold of-it. The witness stood behind, and watched the opportu nity of Mr. Inspey's turning round, and neither touched-nor kissed the book as the others did.— The Commisiioner asked hint - if that was his hand-writing ; •which he acknowledged, and so the transaction ended. The witness, upon his re turn, reprimanded the defendant, said he was afraid he had been deCeived, and refused to have any more concerns with him. The defendant re plied, " Damn it, Barlow, you must be made assignee. I have made you assignee." The wit ness refused to be Sc), but, the defendant forced him, saying it would be no trouble, for he .had . found a gentleman who would take all that off his hands. Mr. Trickey, the, attorney, was intro duced as- this gentleman ; and the witness went up with hini, and pia his name to some other paper, which he afterwards understood was the - acceptance of the assignment. Richard Chitty was his co-assignee. As this perso❑ lived in the country, the witness consented to receive cer tain small debts due'to the bankrupt's estate; and the defendant brought the witness the draft of it circular letter to the debtors, to pay the witnesS'as assignee. In this capacity the witness received upwards of 601. which the defendant told him to pay to Mr. Trickey. He also signed an assign ment of the lease of the bankrupt's house, in con -junction with 11r.Trickey and the delendant, to a ,Mr. Scott, for upwards of 1001. Theavitness did not know of this bargain till he was ealled.up - onto sign, and the money was not paid to him. :always knew, however,' that the defendant had a clerk of the name of Scott. .Some months after this, he feceiVed an invitation to dine at the bank rupt's, where he met the defendant, Mr. Trickey, a Dr. Hunt, a surgeon, and nine or ten more. It was called a finishing dinner, by which the witness nnderstood that the affairs of the bankruptcy 'were wound up to their satisfaction. There never was 'a dividend. The witness then. sigaS -ed the bankrupt's certificate. The witness then deposed; that upon the assignment of the le'ase, he was convinced there was something which ought not.. to be ; a book - was published, and he voluntarity came forward, awl Was examined' be fore the Commissioners. He was given to un derstand - that the bankrupt was in the Fleet 'pri son ; and upon reading, in the book called [Bob], Hollo.way's Strictures on Attornies," his own, name, he went tph.hn, and after purchasing a copy, conversed withitiolloway thereon ; asking bins if he knew this Mr. Barlow?. Hollaway said, No, he had never seen him." " Then bow," the witness replied, '' do you presume to ta asperse his -character ?" ilolloWav said, he A r vn upon information. The witness then disclosed himself, and spewed .him the note, which he had kept in his possession. .Holloway asked him if lie had any objection to come forward ? he said he had none, and.should be glad to do. so. A week. afterwards Mr. Calvert came to him, and he was consequently "summoned before the Commis sioners. Upon his cross-examination by Air. GURNEY, he said he had seen Holloway two or three times, but never to plan any scheme with him. He did not• think there was any harm in - what he did at ; but his trcmour, from. being unused to a court of justice, almost prevented him from knowing what he did. When he was. put to his oath, be thought there was harm ; but he went 11'1` , through tII6 . bdsineSs for fear -6f " - xl )s '7 friend the defendant; whom he had never '!),:„(1, deceptions before. He might have beea3"Teai at the Commissioners' table, whether he lod the defendant money, and be m ight lo ve ';it. sWered " Yes.'' If the question bad beell'iie Ow him,, be Bliould have thrown (10" t. i,Ol note and have done with it. r l ie PPe l was not read to him. If it haCsltatetill.tabtel 1.°,4e lent the bankrupt money, he should never signed it. The defendant did not tell answers to give to the Ctimmissioners. bad prepared him he should have suspeetedolots He would not have kissed the .book tor a" world. . hard antis% Lord E L LENBOROLIGH here interp , e jir7 that this man was so very infamou s that th could - not in a criminal matter believe lino, ti'°" be might speak the. troth. Toe ATTORNEY -GENERAL acqttiesced. Lord Chancellor had sent - the case to hi lll r d pubiic - profecutioniana be bad always fou°l' difficulty in it. - An application Was made dating the rial tn it off on account of a material witness for t I ; 4 e fendant. One of the deponents was the Pr.' : I I ic whose name occurred during the trial; stated that the witness was so ill, that tut °I-s;pre ante at the trial would endanger his life. the refusal of this application, because it , n ; t aid have been made before the trial began, the4tocif ney-General had sent and found tfit;t. had been ever since Monday in th e state:.„,4o the affidavit described. The Attorneyi-Nif. having no witness to confirm the e videaeee' Barlow, retired from the prosecution. Lord 1 -aLENBOROUGII said, the case "e s infamy, and if the witness had ingeno"us'vlotl" vealed hiS own 'share in that infamy, have been competent ; and criminal r i Wert! necessarily often drawn from no beccjiool',' deuce. But in the matter before the jorY' c o ing at the demeanour of the witness, 111) ` ; lit I) ; Bering what he had sworn, although it 19. ( all true, his Lordship thought they 'cook ( 1 1,( 1 1 ,e a verdict against the defendant upon it. t o torney-General had surrendered the c ase " 1 ,04' hands of the Court and Jury 3 ant his thought they could. not convict the deleiltl.inbel the evidence. The Jury therefore loall a t fendant Not Guilty. BOW-STREET. fi 1 04 „i • VOLUNTEER CORPS.—.-11 Mr. Daryalc, ' c ivo tr' in to the St. James's Volunteers, wa s for the •non-payment of fines, amounting r° itor t ° l be Secretary attended and stated the 2'11,5'41;1 the tines for non-attendance, &c. Th e Regulations of the Regiment had been by the Secretary of State, and the delcot!ll,l„P,' bound by la:v to abide by them. The (1 ' t Q • ccc` / •, had removed without giving notice t° (1 1e 05 ; Lary, and was by law equally subject t ° " c. the notices being left at his former residel!cdot defendant appearing on Saturdav, S e c a re ''. bad objections to some of the fines. tary in.rvly, stated, that if had attea°e( the Gentlemen of the Committee, be " °° ,:co tl ;,f tnet with every indulgence, but 60' °c i . .. L t j i" ll get him near them.. On the recotrimeai;.,tvV, Mr. SK ETC HLEY, the Sittity , Magistrat"irtt 1 4 ( matter was now reterred•j ' o the Coilla'" - : j l ' ,t• of the Regiment appeared 41.go$`: charge. His defence Was that he bad beell This case was referred to the Coln c . 1) REPUTED TH 'Es; i ?.s. -D u ring the on' 0 ,0) t Election of Lord Cochrane, Humphres r od 0 the crowd, opposite the hustings , and ( ; 135 : ) 10 11 ',f0 Shields, one of the oldest thieves it) -L ei ( " ( 10, i)- e company with James 'Farthing, ai l thief, attempting to rob several pers`','', f . 51 11 , c 0 0 phreys seized them both, and on seateh'e7,oo", jot two valuable silk handkerchiefs wer e ",:itte` i him. Both the prisoners were coa'}- further , examination. 1 14 ' . lin c . se t The King of l'ittissrA has sent an eil l "; 'lu) snuff-box, enriched with his 1 iettlic,6c-„lflorAtt, liants, to Admiral to/ )he Olirco;;•''‘, RUSSIA left 1000/. to he distribute(' , g t 1 ;:: " 'T t i( li; 1 y i E d cT h o os it i ;s ita se li r t ‘ y 'a l n v t i s t , i c . onsiderati o '' . >. bY 'entleman. o tet which be ivas .6 e talc litan. - . ' ---- _ lIIETEOROLOGIC'AL J- ii-iI 4.rS ' f. l P: ' B Y K. BA N N.S, DL r:F" PHILOSOPHICAL INSTRUMENT . • 3thet • Thermometer. , .• ....: • S' —; vi I 14/ :. . -, : - • ' '-''' i - 5 ;''. • .:' • ' Z -, .. ;, P , :-. .. -- s , o "6' -1 ;:-''• s ' . . .c . : lal .72, ' 4 'il' •,,, ir •, P - July. '1 ' 0 0 ILO es rail. vo.or 9. 59 - I 53 71 54 1 :30.08 yo. Cl et io 1"" 3 63' 64 72 GO .10 Po' iv , • 4 64, 65 73 - 60 ' .15 .07 P o. 5 65 66 76 .56 .14 DO. I7(''' oji 6 64 63 76 57 .10 - Pe. c 0 7 65 69 77 GO .05 l°' ia 5 33 63 6U 62 30.00 ' 1 • .______...„..././ -.......--- .25 ...o r the I~~IP edriesday last, at the Barns, near Degottf Lifo•rd, of a son. On 11,' 1 , ,1r5. Be On tiSaturday'Tuesday, last, 11 , 1 ARM 11 , ;D. Ger'rg,llo - eldest at Lambeth C:hvirele, ?i , a London, totst son ' of Mr. James .Green,3 Mary Ann Kendall, Croydon, S of she c°tupleted her 42d year, Mrs. rS= da O ug a h . t i e ' r ‘. of u t i ;ie L° l : t r t e e l D ‘ CmOwn7tr•e;t r l d C yc es e ":":;': tu ‘i:: 1 _ 11 :;: 1 , • .e. o ° ;Jl W Wiliam r. ear or:iohic )1: On Mond.y z1 1)1 . 9 ) .*.i i) - wi fe .40 LONDON: .t7,ll l 3 ' s a e :s . : 3l : °1 : f I 01 1 : ; : j e c ioa : 3 ras : o; }:: Co : u ) n omery. 411(7' 4 ' ‘l' ,.. A r‘ T.l . ,lt AT 1.0N1)0S•l11111)GI'' ''.(ap.,tes ate ailfat the 0 1(II il cr / I. nnt.es after 31.31. cEAreit.nsilogil,ol:::jt's lubt:inkilsi,ng-Osr;dearns:Leimbli.shed by W. A. SCit 'f';'l : . 4 0 11 --tter'sN(p°O.siti 1 1, 2 3 , idti)t,ras,n:. ;lc ao;itit6:,: ado,