The Sun. — London, England, 1814-05-06 00:00:00

, . , =conld with tegnlarity take a view of the Whole • sohject, he 'should nary submit to . the Howe the. reasons *for which be thought it. impossible for them to proceed on that report, He believed the `present report was such a one as never had been proceeded on since the beginning of time. The first resolOtion was, 'that the export of Corn should be free at hll . times, and without any restrictions , 'Now, the laws for regulating and restraining the • vxport of Corn. had' been in force for near 500 . - veers. These were not among those dormant • ws which often lay neglected on the statute • book ; but the principle of them had been en forced during alinbst every reign in that long pe niud. The Committee.last year had only gone the length of suggesting the propriety of regulating 0 • .e exportation ; but the taking off all restraints to ...N.portation was' a new idea, which was now, for the Prst time, proposed. The Corinnitteethroughout appeared to take this mistaken view of the subject, that it was the interests of the growers of Corn only that they appeared to attend to, and took no notke at all of the interests of the consumers. They, however, sometimes in their report woke of Abe advantages of having provisions cheap, while the main principle and pervading spirit of their report was to get high prices. Those things 'were as-inconsistent and incompatible, as any two opposite principles -could be. With all the dili gence which they stated that they had employed upon the syhject, it seemed as if they had only read 7 out of the 80 Statutes on this subject, which were to be "found , in the books, and they bestowed the most extravagant panegyrics on the Act of the 15th or Charles 11. which, however, it was afterwards taund necessary to repeal. They stated, that, from the operation of this law, Eng land became an exporting country, and from its repeal itb ecame an importing country. They appeared, however, quite to have mistaken both the Act and the effects of it. The Committee• stated directly in their report s that from the year 1765 England became regularly an import..., ing country, and that the price of Corn was pro gressively increased.. This, statement was directly opposite to the fact, as would appear from the Custom-house returns. 'For the first 14 years, after the year 1765, there was an excess of exportation above the import ; for the next five years it was nearly even ; and it was only nine years that there W 93 an excess of import, until the year 1794, when the new and extraordinary circumstances in. Which the world was placed accounted for the rise 'of prices. ' The Committee had stated, that the price. of Corn _had progressively increased front the year 1765 to the year 1794; when the fact was, that .it had not increased at all, and the pr ice of the qufqtern loaf fluctuated during that period from about sixpence to seven-pence. He did not impute to the Committee any intention to de ceive the House ; but they appeared to have exa mined the question in so careless and cursory a manner, that the House could not with any safety proceed upon a report which was so inaccurate, Another Resolution of the Committee against allowing the-importation of flaur, was the most extravagant proposition he had ever heard of. This-would ,be cutting off every resource in times of scarcity ; for on the account of the room which Corn took up, the supplies front America and ;post other couittries came entirely in Flour. It was very extraordinary, that when the witnesses which, the Committee had called from Ireland de clared that they would conceive two guineas a barrel, or 70s. a quarter, a fair.average price for Wheat to be sold at in the Dublin market, the Committee.should, notwithstanding this evidence from their own witnesses, fix 90 or 100 s. a quar ter as the price it ought to be sold at. Mr. Cur wen (a most zealons Agriculturist) thought, at the present exorbitant high rents, 80s. a quarter was a bare saving-price for the farmer, hut the Committee chose to fix a 'much higher price.— This most important subject should undergo a 'lurch_ more attentive examination,.before any le gislative measures were adopted. His opinion was, such a price as would give a fair profit both to the farmers and the laud-holders, would also afford a sufficient supply to the consumers. —As to any alterations 'in the laws, it ap peared to him that those alterations should be principilly regulations as to the im port. At present, the Custom-himse prices, on .Which importation depended, were fixed every three months, and that.was not a sufficient time, -to allow merchants to bring their Corn from the Countries, where 'Corn abounded. The great - land-holders in Poland did not keep their Corn at sea-port towns, but. waited the chance of orders from this Country. The southern parts of-Rus sia, in the neighbourhood of Odessa, and on'the rivers . eommunicating with the Black Sett, af forded a supply -of Corn to any amount, if our merchants had time allowed them to execute their orders, and bring• it into this Country. He felt for the interests of the g rowers of Corn; but he thought the interests of the consumers should be first attended to, and care taken that the Country shotild never want .r- sufficient supply. If Corn was to be permanently at 90 'shillings a quarter, the quartern loaf mit,st be at 13 pence halfpenny ; • and he could see no reason why it was to be kept .at double the price, that it was before the extra- ' ordinary circumstances of the late war. The ques tion, however, required much more serious consi del'athin than appeared to have been giver Lit, be :Cole the Legislature would think it proper to proceed it.• As it was now the mouth of May, and so comprehensive a . subject could not be well examined in. less -than, two or three months-, be thought it would be much better to defer the con- • sid&ation of it till next Session, by which time, perhaps, we should have clearer ideas of what was &fair price for Corn. Sir H. PAIINF4,L was happy that the Right Hon. Gentipian had-given him an opportunity of meet.: in;; him upcin the merit of the Report.. He' was prepared 1 10 maintain the accuracy of all ,the state ments and calculations in that report, except one; He was very sorry that the Committee had not the advantage of the 'Right • Honourable Gentleman's assistance at their , labours. . It lvould he recollected, however, that when he 'first brought forward the subjects his motion Was merely with respect to the Irish Corn Laws ; but,` by a' sudden amendment, it -was extruded to this Kingdom, and three English Members of the Coin were named, without sufficient time-for consideration, or selecting those who might be most aarviceable. He should; in thelitst deny that either his object or that of the Com mittee Was to raise the price of Corti or Bread. If the effect of the Resolutioot would be to pre • tent Cotfl from now falling below the jpresent prices:, he conceived that this effect would be gives ity; an. additional stimulus to the Agt iculturists, and consequently gain 'an increased supply for the future. As too low prices discouraged the fanner; and prevented his furnishing the proper supply for the future s so, on the other hand, if he were encouraged to raise an abundant supply, that would 'necessarily keep down the prices in futute.H. He'agreed with the Right Hon. Gentle man, that the interests of the consumers should he as much attended to as the interests of the growers of Cony; but be conceived that their interests would he most permanently protected by Such prices, and no greater than would give the farmer a fair pro'fit. When the Committee formerly suggested 105 shillings a quarter as the price, it was merely that they recommended the House to, act Its on the principle of the Statote of Charles' 11. which had been found to be so beneficial in its operation. At that time Corn was 52 shillings.a quarter ; and as, to follow the principleof the Act, they must substitute what was the !Test:livable price of the preent and not of past tittles, they (when Corp was sold higher) thought that was the,fair price. They were not at all anxious about what might be considered the proper price. They thought, however, that every body must agree• that the price ought not to be lower than the farmers could afford to raise it for. He should gladly leave it to the House to say what was the fair price of Corn ; but he thought it evident, that it might be so low as not only to be prejudicial to the interests of the farmer; but to the pettnanent interests of the consumer. The Right Hott..Gen tleman had supposed him to be singular in his opinions about the exportoiCorn; on the contrary, he believed that it was the Right Hon. Gent. who was singular in his opinion. Of all the persons he had conversed with on this sobjeet, there was not a • single person who was not favourable to the principle of free exportation. He defended the report alluded to against the charge of incorrect-,, less, except ,in a slight particular. The system pursued for many years was the very reverse of the law of Charles 11, For sixty-eight years, up to 1764, the price of Corn Was 3fis.3d.; thence to 1794, 445. 7d.; and so on, to above-'BU.s. There . was, therefore, a regular increase of prices since the alteration of the' Act of Charles. It was said, that taking' 84s. as the price of Corn would leave the . quartern loaf at double its price in 1794; but it. should be recollected, that there were great changes since in the value of motley. On a fair computation, the quartern loaf was cheaper now, at a corn-price of 84s. than it was in 1794.. It was said, they were not in possession of sufficient information to legislate on the subject at present; • but the report 'was made,nearly a year ago, and there were five or six other cases of Committees on Distillery, &c. in which the matter had been considered. During the 'Whole of last year, it :had been discussed in pamphlets and periodical works : his intention to bring on the 'subject was well mown ; and every Gentleman, wish ing to be master of the subject, might have found full opportunity. The question was one more of principle than of evidence. Restrain importa tion, and the means of doing so were comparatively of less importance. All appeared to, agree that the present Corn Laws should be altered. As a gene ral friend to-universal freedom of trade, he had to explain why he, in this case, favoured restriction. Were out-prices on a level with those of the rest of Europe, he should not be for an artificial sys, tent ; 13ut the difference in this respect made a just. exception to the rule of free, unrestricted trade. If Adam Smith were now giving an npi , Dion, it would differ, under the circumstances, froM that contained in his work. Corn, he had said, was so'bulky as to preclude great importations ; but yet Corn came from Poland at a lower rate than. our farMers could produce it.; yet the price had risen greatly, .from the recent circumstances on the Continent, whiCh had raised it op to 125 shit , Hugs, and had given an impulse to oar own Agri culturists to grow it in greater abundance. A sud den importation, after peace, would therefore be destructive to the capital employed in our own', cultivation. Smith , said, the proportion o irri- Torztad to grown Corn was as ono 500th part of consumption. But in the last nine or ten years it was as one 25th, and sometimes as one 10th of 12th' part. kali other nations acted on a liberal principle, our policy might be different. _The great point was, which was most productive of national wealth,--the entire freedom, or the restricted trade ? The former Would produce - a great diminution of our wealth, though it might assist our manufacturing interests for a time. If we were left dependent on foreigners,the time might come when we should be compelled to disgraceful measures, front our own necessities. It would he the greatest injury to individuals to take away suddenly the protections given by a restricted . trade. Some thought we could never be an ex porting. country; but the Irish merchants said they could. last year have exported largely to Brazil, . Corn - was a drug in Ireland, while it was _ a rarity in-Jamaica. Ireland should be considered as an , agricultural country ; and- the deficiency here, owing to our extensive manufactures, could be supplied ; and we ought to give Ireland the preference over Poland or other countries. Mr. ROSE and Sir H. PARNELL mutually ex phlined. Mi% FRANK LAND LEWIS spoke at considerable length in answer to Sir H. P. There was a strong suspicion in the minds of the people, worked upon by the artful, that . iu measures on thiS subject something , was attempted against - their interests. The questioo` might to receive a full and fair dis-, , rtssion. Individual interests were too often at tended to in such ,Measures, and the permanent interests of the many neglected. The object of the report seemed to he higlr prices, and the Pub , • lie Must pay them II;gh 'prices were to be the stimulusat and low ones the consequence;--this was 'somewhat suspicious. Any increase in the price 'Of Bread .Coro would tend to. increase the price oflahour, and the farmer would' have to pay apt rnere4sed price for every thing he wanted. — True, Cdrn.fell in the early part of last century but, in 168$, England and WaleS. were calcuikireti only at 5,500,000 population, which was one . mail - - to ten i= In 1755, It Nvas Supo. - oseekto ue iii creased only one. million. Could a change be won dered at, wbeu bad then so small a number to feed ? The CIIkNCELLOR of the EXbIIEaLIER compli mented the last Speaker, but said he should agree to the Committee; not that he entirely con curred with the propositions now moved by the Hon. Baronet, but because he understood an amendutent would be moved by an Hon. Friend, Ilicit might. lead to a full discussion on a future day. The lion. Baronet had droliped the gradu ated , scale which lie adopted last year, and which appeared JO him (the Chancellor) to be the - best. Sir J. NEWPORT noticed with some warmth an expression bt . Mr. F. Lewis, which he conceived tended to intimate that the House might be. influ enced by opinions out of doors. Mr. LEwis diselalmed.any such meaning. Sir W. DouclAs supported the propositions. Lord A. PlAmturoti doubted whether lowering the price of Corn would not defeat the first ob, ject of the Mover ,' which was to remunerate the farmer. Sir •11.1. RIDLEY opposed, and. Sir N. COUL - TO IntST supported, the propositions. • The House then went into.the Committee, and the first and second Resolutions were read. Mr; HUSKISSON rose to move an Amenament, which he prefaced by a very able speech, pointing out the injurious effect that were now, and had, been produced, by the operation o the Corn :.Laws, as they at'present stood. There were two objects, lie thought, which tiaght to, be particu larly kept in view by a great nation : tire first, that it 'should not depend upon foreign supplies ; and the!Second, that it should be the endeavour of legislative enactments - $0 maintain a steady uniformity of price in the value . of' Corn.— The ,fluctuations in the price of Corn be at tributed wholly to. the operation of the law, and that fluctuation had a -direct and injurious effect upon the .price of ' labour, and . more _espe cially upon - agricultural labour.' ln. 1806 the'Le gislature departed a little - -from the established system, by •allowing Ireland to' export Corn ,to this Country; and what tnid been the consequence ? That many millions of money had found its way, into the Sister Country, to the great improvement of Ireland, in a variety of beneficial ways. 'Such a stimulus, too; had been created there, that Ire-' land now was able to export, with the greatest fa cility, to the amount of three millions annually,— The impolicy of depending for foreign supply was furthershewn in the con - sequences of the Continen tal system, now so happily aholished: one among the'many evils_ which that system inflicted upon this country, was the high price of Corn ; nor . was it at all improbable, that even the proceedings of America against us, her embargoes, &c. Were founded upon the base, .bitt delusive hope, of starving us into submission." It was of impor 7 tance, therefore, in a political point.of view, and to enable us to maintain our foreign political re lations with dignity, and energy, that- we should not' have to fear, from the hostility of any Power,. •a, deficiency in the means of subsisting our popty• lation(Hear, hear !).—With regard to the 2d Proposition, it went too much. on - the idea of giving the Eiiglish grower a monopoly in the Englishmarket,, and of interdicting all speculation in foreign supplies, till Corn should attain such a Price as to indicate a aeficiency in our own. Whatever Might; be. the Duty on the import4tion of Corn from other countries, it appeared to him, that it' would be expedient, with a view to the encourage ment of the growth of Coal in our provinces in North - America,_ that the Corn imported thence should pay but half the ordinary duty.—(Hear; hear !).—After some further observations, the HOttourable Gentleman concluded with -moving' an amendt»ent, theasnbstance.of whiclr was, that 635. a quarter should be the price at which Corn shoild be mllowed to be imported; on - paying the Duty of 245. 3d. ; and that as the Corn rose in . price, the duty should diminish in exact propor tion, so.that whenever Corn might rise to Sts. a quarter, the Duty should cease and determine. • Sir'H. PARN'ELL said, for the sake of humanity, he would agree to the amendment, Tie CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER thought it expedient that the discussion should be delayed till another opportunity. Mr. LlustussoN's amendment to the 'original, resolution, of substituting another schedule, was agreed to. The other resolutions, with some aMendmeutS, were agreed to. The CHANCELLOIT of the EXCHEQUER moved a new resolution, for allowing foreign, corn to be warehoused in this country, so that it might be exported duty free, if it was not allowed tv conic into the home market. The resolutions were then agreed to,. and the report received and committed - for Monday se'n night, to give sufficient time for its consideration. The other Orders were then disposed of; after which the House adjourned. METEOROLOGICAL JOURNAL. BY B. BANKS, PHILOSOPHICAL INSTRUMENT MAKER, STRAND., Th e r m o m et e r . Weather. ' . . . ~.. . . ...7 • ..; .. • .2 . • g' •c7i T., • re 4; .51 , 'i ►p - 1 ; 1 4 -6-1 A .a.. I IV) . ... ..4 .7 ' I c) -4 1 ' ' 7 c% a: , = . , . , • • , April. j' i ° C " Inches . 23. 45 46 1 ,54 43 80.15 Cloudy Rain* 24 47 44 f5l 41 29.94 ' .15 Rhin* Do.* 25 45 45 48 Al' .99 .10 Do. Cloudy 26 47 44 53 139 30.05 - .06 Showryl Fair 27 45 45 51 143 .25 , ' Fair I Cloudy 28 46 47 50 45' ' ..2 •, .03 Rairi Rain 2 , 30 51 55 48' .9,0 .16 Showry Cloudy .30 Boise terous Weather, COAL MARKET, MAY 4. •Sliips at Market.. so!d. Price. • 11 i\ - ewca•ale - 8 les. Oii. to 555.11. d .- 'Sunderland., .1. 48s. Od. to Od. LAW DitELLIGtNeb. . . cbuitT KING's BENCH, MAT 6. THE KING V. R. buitt&e. The defendant, who had suffered jgM udent ITV default, oh aft intbrination Which, charged 011 With assaulting Giffatd, the B ar rister, wit h , a view to ptovcike hint to fight in a du ct ; sag brought up fof judgment. . tion Committee, for which Petition the efon sse bee l t il i e •e a ta ffi in d e a d vi .L o C f ol‘nint'seGLibffetaresttEthteeCThretgbciritsbEC ibeadej: ant was agent. In the course of summing fir evidence, which devolved upon him as julit c ': GCu‘rinby, observations sel' f h a e t lie ' "or t: 15 ; ohe calle d•t-thu e had been : contradicted by other. witness es • r ►n ts , soon as the business was over, he received .a n sage from, the defendant, tbrotigh y sptio defendant; n o 1 n c ii f k h e ( t)is s lee o tholls, that the defendant denianded an .1) 0 1.. or explanation fdr what bad been said of !,. e Gurney by Mr. Gifford, in his speech before t!:,. Cominittee. Mr. Gifford replied, had said was in the exercise of his duty, and he'should make no apology l' he " t ' te t ter rested for sometime, when lie.received le., from the defendant, stating, that Sll'• conversation out of the , Committee, ill ( ' 7 - ;., 11 , e t the on the eVidenFe of .I.lr. Gurney, and . f c. ,) r ;o4 `.7 .i ' r defeodant expected an apology. Ir. tije silb - • fused to, have any further intercourse oti ject, and denied he had spoken of li '(A the 9th Iv except profeSsionolly. At length; on that what laG, July, as Mr. Gifford was walking An Cl V lc G c u'f: lane with two other "Barristers, he met - 1111 ' his ney, who gently laid his horse whip aa`li s i .,-,6t shoulders, as he said, for the •supposea ' defend' offered to Lis father. For this offence the ant was convicted.--The defendant's affiti3vit beconvicted.--Theboo, ing readovhiebdid not contradict any of thc 3 , 6Cl l ‘ facts, and Counsel being heard, the tenced him to six monthS', imprisonment in the, . bis King's Bench prison, and to find scc uritY I ° s l o. good behaviour tor two years, himself in - and two sureties id 2501. each. tis 'PETE ARTS.—The Association of Ar ts Or ° first combined for the purpose of submitth'g h t TER-COLOURED DRAWINGS to the Pu hiiei G s I.° have thought proper to add OIL s this their Exhibition, have opened their NA T Q l ( . .i ic tio. l ,i year to public inspection. The chief 1 0(1 ,,`'t - ,ct 01 is a large picture by Mr..l-lA' yDoN, the sui9`t•ect which Judgment of Solomon a s t , a rf'e're'l that has been often treated, and therefore -" 10 4 scope for invention and genius. Mr. HA vW , 'N an d treated the snbject in very masterly mallaC : i' t 01 .0 the objections w hiCh ma y 1 - te made agai° st - The not important, compared with its n ierits'i; l e; person of SoLomoN perhaps, too fe' ln i i ° ii tbe nor does there appear that au g u s t dignitY to forth altogether which might be expected, tingniSh so , renowned and wise a Monarc it ';, ' ,ed agitation of the.real nAother is well exP';„,4s but there P. is an appearance of malignant viit in the face of the pretended mother, w hicii 1 ::,;(f5 naturally excite suspicion, and consegnen tiY ot 0 t to lessen respect for the intuitive discet' 4) l S e t l ( 7 lo .l in u re d ( g i n r ( l li l l e is la t o; c ly e i c s if a t d h n e lh E .a x b e ly eU fo ti l p: e i te , o l e i : l o ; The two Jews 'who appear in the 01' 0 0,0 4 rect 5 exhibit .. an appropriate expression :%li e I At; his attention to the Executioner, withon t 3 , ll: o !beD ticular emotion; and the other seems 41 '" • ' -i ce ea in drowsy meditation. But we shall n° t in ottr objections to a Picture which .; ail honour. to the Artist, but to the e O l -5 ":lNt GrovEn, HILLS, VARLAY, MACKENSIO , •and all the other well-known A r tists,s ( " h v ; -maintain their credit, and add beauty ' t " - lection. A COURT ar COMMON COI.INCIL.----Yes' r ; 11 1, ;c" , '" Court , of Common Council Was held; ;Silica numerously attended.—Mr. Alderman fitli cli ider' slatted the Report of the Committee fo .CO' l- a the ing the Assize of Bread, which recoutnietwe that repeal of the Assize,. and moved, profor i l' c ; the Court should- agree 'with the C ollllllt i e hic h their .Report. A long discusion ensued , i" 1' Jr. Mr. JACKS, Mr. DIXON, Mr. WAITHS A ,% . I O O ' GRIFFITHS, anti Mr. FAVELL, stippoked,tj-,0;11. tion, which was' opposed by .Alderme ll ATKINS; and GOODBEHERE, and Mr. JuD lci The question was• then-put and agreed o ef BIRTH, S. tbe - On the 24th ult. at Coolcham, -twat' Niaidenbead) of the Rev. , Thomas Whately; of a son. tle cliel' c3 ' On Wednesday last, at Winchestet-HCiuse , - ~. te r. Lady of the Ito': CharlesAngustus North, us a d ` ni ' b. -"l ii3r ' e Yesterday, at his house in Chqrles-street, BerlteleFlo g irl" the Lady of Captain Etly . iard Codrington; R. N. Cf_t:_:l>-------. • MARRIED. i r t b6 lon. a '4 7 r l e d d i r , i , e v s v d . a j )l n ist iv a e t v la n ie S t . c s h , i o n w gt e o n n. , , Beth, eldest dauglitin. of Arther Annesley, Esti• ° f ton Park.. • ,Nirat lia jj Yesterday, at 'St. Augnstin's and St. Faith'i, street, Mr. John Read,' eldest son of the late '. ) ;:,%" 2 „ . tl Esq. Chairman a the Commissioners of Land' i j -e LI of City of London, and nephew to James ,Read, Ebqliter Magistrate of Police, to Miss Ann Briand, third dlltl.g .Mr. Briand,,of Love-lane. A isrouNT BrunpoßT.---within these 4da ' . ' • ' DIED, vs l a 3,1:: v . _ der Hood, Viscount Bridport; K. B. Ad f in e iral l yice-Adniral of England., and a General of the al 14.4.. b 'l e n f) e ( s i . Married first, Mary, 'daughter of Nichald 1/7 ` .. .ard s ' 'Mary Sophia,ry ol Du Durham, , s w tii h v o i v d i i n e g d , without daughter iss , t , r f e l .• b a , : 0 (1 0 8 ,. 1 . t t•4 o Vily , : s / u p e ! The Viscount eras N - v,:s thi b le rO " t x r:er Esg to . b S y an " ;n l V.V " is i' cO nilleth i ld;ci ll 'rill: Ed nion t„., • \i - N i vas created a Peer of Ireland in 1794, Baron •••04':itaip. c_47l9i6r,ia,ruedstViniispetol,nttoßtrh.icelplorritshinfixl:toßlrobont3ltoinni,G,, r s 4 : 3 ; i je . l, 5C ' ca,gi Q e : eti d i r l y :t 2 . ° l o7 ) n e f : 1 6; e f i t ,as h I rl i s : e e :l i a : l i i i : t y ri,e a l _ Western 1" Cutintv of Sussex. • • A 50. On Tuesday, Charles Danvers. F,s .' of Bristol, ag,, e— hai l ' On'Friday last., at her house; Ice' %I:ton-place' ` ra t il i: Mary, ~:idow of the late Will. As " ' ±.- Esq. 01 ''' .14U1 p.i.1.1:11. 0,,, On Saturday last, at Huntingdo mils. , jest y's,Cust Herbert, wife of IV. Herbert, .. ,' `less,. lat ° t4 l.S (l a a n te da o Y f rat' I;ats:Ntilirdae,ci‘ir,l4,,e, iou,r,:facigtc,lii:sl;eho;nui .oe!,iiiNii.,:shcod,uggptr.ot:lo,l).fes oci4;iiii c. theLi e s ttrt4re: t ta b s e t; f a a t tio n e a c i f is c ha o t r u, l SOßs'ex . ; ,. C i l i l v ° 4 7. °l' ,. f i a ll ) r)le y -14' ," i'‘.e64' ` .g‘ tlandto. ort 1 74 yea; s. - , , . • ' ...----------------' . . Ls, t . t, after a shoa iiiue--, Q. Nl) 4. o l l' E ll ven tr il7,v r : l2;rifi(:-"l‘ulte)sl-1:1&" ?domino- 3 • . i f ter LONDON : Printesl,bV JAB. UARS'IAIRS•' o buildings ; published by IV. A. SCII.II, r tiFe . at the' SuN-OFFicc, No. St ra nd ;m'" "" meats, OidelLetters (pcabt-paid,&c. allot lac