The Sun. — London, England, 1845-06-30 00:00:00

RAILWAY COMMITTEE. (SATURDAY.) HOUSE OF COMMONS. GROUP X. LINCOLN AND CAMBRIDGE RAILWAY. (Continued from our Afternoon Edition of Saturday.) Mr. Webb was the next witness sailed, with a view to rebut the Cambridge and Lincoln evidenoe, as to agricultural traffic. When his examination had concluded, the Committee adjourned at four o'clock. PARLIAMENTARY DIVISIONS. (I'r'on the Totes and Proceedings of the House qi` C077111141M) FRIDAY, JUNE 27. SUPPLY. Motion made, and Question proposed, " That the Order of the Day far the Committee of Supply be now read :—Amendment proposed, to leave out from the words " That the" to the end of the Question, in order to add the words " Returns, No. 72 and 248, made by the General Peat-office, be referred to a Select Committee, with a view of inquiring into the accuracy of those Returns; also, into the pre sent mode of remunerating by fees and perquisites certain officers of the General Post-office, and how far the duties of that establishment may be rendered more satisfactory to the public, and less unequal and oppreesive to the persons engaged therein." instead hereof:—Question put, " That the words proposed to be left out stand part of the Question." The House divided: — MAJORITY—AYES, 106. Acland, Sir T. Egerton, Sir P. Meynell, Captain A'Court, Captain Entwiele, William Mundy, E. 3f. Adare, Viscount Fitzroy, Henry Neville, Ralph Arbuthnott, H. Forman, T. S. Newdegate, C. IT Arkwright, George Fremantle, Sir T. Nicholl, John Baillie, Colonel Gasket', J. M. O'Brien, A. S. Baillie, H. J. Gladstone, W. E. Pakington, J. S. Baird, William Gladstone, Captain Patten, J. W. Baldwin. Barry Glynne, Sir S. Peel, Sir R. Baring, F. T. Gordon, Captain Peel, Jonathan Baring, Thomas Gore, Montague Polhill, Frederick Baring, W. B. Goulburn, 11. Pringle, Alexander Bentinck, Lord G. Graham, Sir J. Richards, Richard Beresford, Major Granby, Marquis Scott, Frances Boldero, H. G. Greene, Thomas Shaw, Frederick Borthwick, Peter Raiford, Sir H. Sheridan, R. B. Botfield, Beriah Henley, J. W. Smith, T. B. C. Bowles, Admiral Herbert, Sidney Spooner, Richard Broadley, Henry Holmes, W. A'Court Stewart, John Broadwood, H. ?tope, Charles Stuart, Henry Buller, air J. Y. Hope, G. W. Sutton, H. M. Cardwell, Edward Hussey, Ambrose Tennent, J. E. Carew, W. H. P. Hussey, Thomas Thesiger, Sir F. Clerk, Sir G. Ingestre, Viscount Tollemache, John Cockburn, Sir G. Jermyn, Earl Trench, Sir F. W. Copegaied, Alderman Jocelyn, Viscount Trevor, G. R. Corry, Henry Jones, Captain Trollops, Sir J. Cripps, William Kemble, Henry Verner, Colonel Damer,:Colonel Knightley, Sir C. Vernon, G. 11. Darby, George Lascelles, W. S. Vivian, J. Ennis Davies, David A. I. Liddell, H. T. Wellesley, Lord C. Dickinson, F. 11. Lowther, Sir J. H. Wortley, James S. Douglas, Sir H. Lygon, General Douglas, Sir C. Mackenzie, T. Drummond, H. If. Mackenzie, W. F. Duncombe, A. M`Neill, Duncan Egerton, W. T. Masterman, John TELLEES. Baring, Henry Lennox, Lord A. BILNORITY-NOES, 30. Barnard, E. G. Langston, J. H. Tancred, H....W. Barrington, Viscount Lemon, Sir C. Villiers, Charles Brotherton. Joseph Marsland, Henry Wakley, Thomas Busfeild, William. Martin, John Warburton, H. Collett, John Mitchell, T. A. Wawn, J. T. Craig, W.G. .hunts, G. F. Williams, W. Curteis, H. B. Murray, AlexanCer Wyse, Thomas Dennistoun, John O'Conor, Don Forster, Matthew Paget, Colonel TELLERS. Hawes, Benjamin Pechell, Captain Duncombe, T. neathcoat, John Plumridge, Captain Bowling, Dr. (IN THE COMMITTEE.) Motion made, and Question put, " That a sum, net exceeding 3,2401., he granted to her Majesty, towards the Expenses of the Ea. clestastical Commissioners for England, to the 31st day of March, 1840." The Committee divided:— MAJORITY-AYES, 61. Acland, Air T. D. Fitzroy Henry •Nicholl. John Acton, Colonel Flower, Sir James Parker, John Baring, F. T. Fremantle, Sir T. Peel, Sir R. Barrington, Viscount Gsskell, J. M. Peel, Jonathan Boldero, H. G. Glacistone,raptain Plumptre, J. P. Bowles, Admiral Godson, Richard Protheroe, Edward Boyd. John Gordon, Captain Scott, Francis Broadwood, Henry Goulburn, Henry Sheridan, R. B. Bruce, Lord E. Graham, Sir J. Smith, T. B. C. Cardwell, Edward Grogan, Edward Spooner, Richard Clayton, B. R. Hamilton, W. J. Stansfield, W. R. C. Clerk, Sir George Henley, J. W. Stuart, Henry Clifton, J. T. Herbert, Sidney Sutton, H. M. Cockburn, Sir G. Hotham, Lord Tollemache, John Copeland, Alderman Houldsworth, T. Trench, Sir F. W. Corry, Henry Liddell, 11. T. Trevor, G. R. Cripps, William Lincoln, Earl Wellesley, Lord C. Davies, D. A. S. Mackenzie, W. F. Deedes,.W. Mackinnon, W. J. TICLLERS. Denison, E. B. M`Neill, Duncan Baring, Henry Dickinsoa, F. H. Martin, C. W. Lennox, Lord A. Egerton, Sir P. Masterman, Jahn MINORITY-NOES, 19. Anson, Colonel Hawes, B. Villiers, Charles Rrotherton, J. Hindley, Charles Warburton, H. Collett, John Martin, John Wawn, John T. Crawford, W. S. :Morris, David Duncan, George Muntz, G. F. Duncannon, Lord Redinirtou, T. ti. Ferguson, Sir R. Ricardo, J. L. Gibson, T. M. Somerville, Sir W. tioned to her relatives was merely a cover stb enable him to carry on his intimacy with her. The CHIEF BARON, in summing up, thought the ex planation of the affair on the part of the defendant but a poor excuse for his conduct, and said he thought the plaintiff was entitled to damages, but that Lnder all the circumstances they ought to be moderate. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Da mages, 101. SHERIFFS' COURT, June 28. (Sittings at Guildhall, before Mr. Commissioner BuLLocK.) WILBEE V. ASHMEAD. ` 6 A SCENE IN COURT."—SLANDEROUS DEFENCE. — The plaintiff in this action is the landlord of the Three Tuns, Moor-street, Seven-dials ; the defendant is a hatter in Davies-street, Berkeley-square. The action was brought to recover the sum of 71. 12s. 2d., for wine, &c., supplied, and money lent. Mr. PEARSON—For plaintiff, stated the case. On the 24th of March the defendant went to the plaintiff's house with some friends, and had dinner and wine for self and friends, and the bill amounted to 21. 10s. Two or three days afterwards he was again at plaintiff's house, and borrowed 71. He now pleaded the statute against tippling, although it was for wine, steaks, chops, &c., &e., and that the 71. lent was for gaming in plaintiff's house. The defendant's Counsel would en deavour to prove that he had been fraudulently induced to drink the plaintiff's wine, smoke his cigars, and borrow his money. He, the Learned Counsel, would be able to prove that the transaction on the part of the plaintiff was of the most upright character, and that there was not the slightest ground for any one of the pleas. The plaintiff's waiter proved that the defendant went to the house on the 24th of March last. He was a stranger, but brother to a person who put up at the house. At night, when he was asked for the money, he said it must be put down to him, and he would call again. He was trusted on account of his connexions. Mr. Edward Jackson proved that defendant signed an I 0 U for money borrowed. Defendant was not drunk. He appeared but very little damaged by what he had drunk. Mr. DOUSE said that the defence was not a dishonest one, but one brought forward by the defendant's friends, in the performance of a duty they owed to society. The defendant's house was a house open to prostitutes and gamblers, and the plaintiff was a panderer to the follies and extravagance of youth. The defendant was a young man, and only twenty-two years of age, and having been a very steady young man, was set up in business by his friends. Unfortunately his brother, who was a different character, lodged at plaintiff's, and defendant was unfor tunately induced to visit, and there he fell in with gam blers, and played at unlawful games with plaintiff himself, who induced him, whilst in a state of intoxication, to give the I 0 U. He, therefore, called upon the jury as parents and friends, by their verdict, to protect the unwary. John Wills, a carpenter of Arlington-street, Camden town, was called—He could not identify the defendant as being at the house, He saw a game at billiards played, and plaintiff said it was for 10s. a game. Witness and a friend then played and the plaintiff and others went to bagatelle. He saw no card playing, and that was the only time he was in the house. Mr. DOUSE said he was deceived in the evidence the witness could give. Joseph Ashmead, brother to defendant—Was in the habit of lodging at plaintiff's. Whist and cribbage was played on the night in question at 15s, a game, and his brother was drunk when he signed the note. The cross-examination of witness elicited such impro babilities that the counsel for plaintiff would not address the jury in reply. The LEARNED COMMISSIONER without summing up asked if they were satisfied. The jury, with great excitement, exclaimed, " All, all," " unanimously, a verdict for the plaintiff, we don't believe the defence, and we believe the plaintiff to be a very respectable man." The plaintiff's counsel said an action should be brought against defendant for the scandal of that day. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. (SATURDAY.) MARYLEBOANE. Mr. John Fiddes, who described himself as a gentle man, residing at No. 4, St. Anne's Villas, St. John's Wood, was brought up in custody, and placed at the bar, charged with the following robbery. The prisoner is the husband of Miss H. Cawse, the well-known vocalist. Thomas Maughen, clerk to Messrs. Osborne and Co., No. 22, St. James's-street, silversmith, deposed that on the previous evening, about six o'clock, the prisoner en tered the shop, and presented a note, at the same time asking if the sum alluded to therein had been sent. The note, which had been written by Mr. Osborne, sen., was here handed to the Magistrate. It was addressed to Mrs. Fiddes, No. 26, Manchester-street, Manchester-square, and ran thus : TELLEns. Williams, William Bowring, Dr. L AW INTELLIGENCE. BAIL COURT June 28. (Sittings in Banco. ) Lurd Denman, Mr. Justice Coleridge, and Mr. Justice Wil liams were the presiding judges. COOPER r. HARDING AND SMITH. This was a motion on the part of the defendants for a non suit on a verdict for the defendants, on several grounds. The short facts of the case are these :—Messrs. Harding and Smith, the defendants, are solicitors, at Birmingham, and be came agent to the assignees of a bankrupt, named Goold, an ironmonger at Stafford. The assignees were in litigation with the plaintiff, Cooper, their former solicitor, in respect to some trusts. The matter had been the subject of a suit in Chancery, hut thinking the suit would be brought to a more speedy ter miati,n, it was taken before Mr. Daniels, Commissioner of Bankruptcy. The defendants being desirous of Mr. Cooper's appearance before the Commissioner, served him with a sum mons to attend before the Court, but Mr. Cooper, when the sum mons was tendered to him, refused to attend, unless his expenses were paid as a witness. The defendants then applied to the Commissioner for a warrant to compel his attendance, who observed that if they had not done what was right regarding the summons, they were not entitled to a warrant, owing to the expenses not having b een t en d ere d ; b ut upon b e i ng presse d the Commissioner said, that at their awn peril, and upon their own responsibility, he would grant the warrant. The warrant was accordingly taken out. grant the warrant. The warrant was accordiogly taken out. Baddam, the officer of the Court, rut it into execution, and Mr. Cooper was brought in custody before the Court. Mr. Cooper brought an action against the .t Pendants for false imprisonm: nt, which was tried before Lord Denman, and a verdict was had against them. Thereupon the present proceedings ensued. Counsel for the plaintiff prayed that the rule might be d seharged. The defendant's plea was, first, that the plaintiff was sus pecte by Mr. Commissioner Daniels ; and secondly, that he was generally suspected for the act, and says that a witness is not bound to attend unless his expenses are paid, but in the case ,of suspected persons, postpones the question of expenses until the suspected person be examined. The summons, however, elid not set forth any such suspicion, and the jury by their verdict recognised the fact that the Commissioners did not regard Mr. D. Cooper as a suspected person. The summons merely set forth that the solicitors for the assignees believed 31r. Cooper to be a person who could give useful information in the case, but tee warrant recited that he was a person sus- Dected to be in possession of some o f t h e b an k rupts ' goo d s. . - Their Lordships took time to consider their judgment. " Mr. Osborne will thank Mrs. Fiddes to send him a line whether he will do right in sending a money order. It will be directed, June 17, 1845. No. 22, St. James's stvet." Mr. LONG (to witness) : Now state all that took place. —Witne,s took the note to Mr. Osborne, who after perusing it, said he knew nothing about it. Witness then gave that information to the prisoner, delivering him back his note ; and soon after his departure witness discovered that six silver forks had been abstracted from the counter. He looked out of doors as speedily as pos sible, but could not discern the prisoner. He after wards, from information received, went to No. 26, Ben tinck-street, and there found that the prisoner was liv ing at St. Anne's Villas, where he was, the same night, taken into custody. Prisoner —I am, as described, a gentleman, and living with my father in Great St. llelen's. I was at the house on the day in question, but knew nothing of the robbery. Mr. LONG decided on remanding him till next Satur day ; but, at the solicitation of his friends, consented to take bail for his appearance on that occasion—himself in 5001., and two sureties in 2501. each. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, June 28. (Ikfore Lord Chief Justice TINDAL ) HOLCROYT V. NOGGINS AND OTHERS. Mr. Serjeant Murphy, Mr. Serjeant Dowling, and Mr. Ileggins appeared as counsel for the plaintiff ; Mr. Serjeant Talfourd and Mr. Lush for the defendants. This was an action brought by Mr. Holcruft to re . cover from the defendants, as registered proprietors of the Newcastle Advertiser, 1051. for a year's services in supplying leading articles to that publication. It was in June, 1844, that the plaintiff first wrote for this paper, b,ing engaged by a Mr. Lowkin as agent for the de fe.adants, and some months afterwards a contract was entered into with the plaintiff to write such articles from November to November next. It was, however, shown tiiat the real contract was from Christmas, 1844, fur a y,iar. The defendants remain e d registered proprietors at the Stamp-office, and their names appeared as such at the end of each number of the Newcastle Advertiser, down to the present time. It was, therefore, contended that there could be no doubt the contract was made on behalf of the defendants, and that they were liable in the present action. Evidence having been given of these facts, witnesses IN ere about to be called to prove the custom on other rapers, but the Learned Judge doubted the relevancy of such testimony, and it was not continued. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD, in addressing the jury, said that the case on the part of the defence was, that the de fendants were not responsible in this action. They had allowed their names to remain entered at the Stamp office as proprietors of the Newcastle (formerly the Great Northern) Advertiser, long after they had ceased to have any connexion therewith. In October, 1843, the defendants assigned the paper by a bill of sale by way of mortgage to a Mr. Netham ; and in the begin ning of June last the defendants sold the paper to Mr. Lowkin, who thus became the whole and sole proprietor of the Newcastle Advertiser. The deeds of assignment and sale, &c., were put in to prove these facts, and Mr. Lowkin gave evidence to establish his own sole responsi bility for the payment of the plaintiff, and to show that the plaintiff had regarded him in that light. Mr. Sergeant MURPHY, in his :reply, contended that the defendants' case was an attempt to shift the responsibility from the real proprietors to one who really was not liable, but who had engaged the plaintiff merely as agent for the defendants. The Learned JUDGE having summed up, the jary retired to con s id er t h e i r ver di ct, an d a f ter an a b sence of half an hour, returned into court with one for the defendants. The Learned JUDGE reserved forlthe opinion of the Court above th e question, whether the statute did not constitute an estoppel to the defendants' denying they wereroti proprietors as their names were reg i stere d at t h e P-office as such, and whether such circumstance was not to be taken as conclusive evidence of th e i r b e i ng really propri e t ors o f t h e paper in question. COURT OF ExCHEQUER, June 28. BRADFOR D v. STON EHEWER. BREACH OF PRO MISE OF R o ttlAßE. ints was an action for a breach of promise marriage brought by the plaintiff, a young female, against the defendant, who was a widower. It appeared that shortly before last Christmas, the plaintiff, with her sister a nd her a unts , went to cricket match at Wimbledon , where she resides, and the evening the party paid a visit to the Plough Tavern, in that place, where they met the d efendant. T he result of the meeting was an intimacy between the parties, a n d he defendant begged to be permitted to visit the plain tiff as her suitor. This was acceded to, and be frequently *isited her in that capacity. In some short time afterwards .the plaintiff became pregnant, and it was al:eaed that she was so because of her acquaintance with the de fendant, which,, however, he denied. It was at the same time given innvp bat he frequently expressed his determination • intir di-Via:l6ff, and as he refused to carry out his s .;:. • ibisitospect, the present action was brought. . A Mr. &LYLE'', on4be part Oritte defendant, denied that there had ever been any promise of marriage of the plain= and his speaking an the tubject in the way men- THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY EVENING. JUNE so, 1845 CORK THEATRE. After an absence from this city of ten years, during which period the inhabitants of the capitals and princi pal towns of Europe and America have testified their admiration of her genius in the most flattering and sub stantial manner, that highly-gifted actress, Madame Celeste, made her appearance at the Victoria Theatre, before a full and fashionable audience. She wag sup ported by Mr. Webster, whose reputation as an actor, and talent as manager of some of the principal London theatres are well known. When last in Cork, those who witnessed the performance of Celeste in the Arab Boy, Alp the Renegade, the Wept of Wishton Wish, and other eharacters which she has made exclusively her own, deemed the foreign aid of language superfluous—so ex pressive were her gesticulations and attitudes, and so full of meaning and eloquence were her looks while pourtraying in silence the feelings which influenced her. On the present occasion she has come before the public in quite a different range of characters, which are admirably calculated to display to advantage her varied talents. The sensation she created last evening in the character of Marie Ducange, written expressly for her by Mr. Boyle Bernard, showed a just appreciation of her powers in developing that very interesting drama. We have never seen anything more painfully affecting or fearfully real than the mad ness of Marie, and it will be long, indeed, before the impression created by her powerful acting in the most striking scenes will be effaced from the recollection of the audience. Mr. Webster was exceedingly happy in the character of Frong, who is an admirable satire on the present mania for speculation, and convulsed the house with laughter by the effective manner in which he deli vered some passages. After the curtain fell, Madame Celeste was called for amid the most deafening applause, and was greeted when she made her appearance from box, pit, and gallery, in the most enthusiastic manner. The performance concluded with a laughable afterpiece, entitled the Trumpeter's Daughter, in which Celeste, as Madelon, and Webster, as Philip, won renewed applause by their admirable acting. In the last scene the original Polka was danced by Celeste in a style never equalled in this city. It was loudly encored, and the curtain fell amidst murmurs ofapprobation.—Corh Southern Reporter. FALL OF THE CHAPEL OF BOATSWAIN SMITH. On Saturday morning, shortly before three o'clock, an accident nearly attended with a frightful loss of life, and which has involved a serious destruction of property, occurred in Wellclose-square, nearly facing the brigade engine -station. At the time stated above, Police-con stable 11 161, whilst going his rounds, had his attention directed to the premises used by Boatswain Smith, as a preaching• house, and which have been termed the Mariners' Church, by hearing a loud noise, as of the falling of timbers, within the building. The constable immediately endeavoured to arouse the inmates, but be fore he could do so the whole building fell with a tre mendous crash to the ground, carrying along with it the adjoining premises, known as the Mahogany Bar public•house and Albion Saloon. Fortunately, Mr. Collins, the occupier of the latter build ing, with his wife and family, managed to effect their escape. As soon as the dust had in some measure cleared away, a most distressing scene presented itself. The whole of the orphan children suddenly emerged from one of the back apartments, and crawling upon the top of the ruins, were bewailing their impending fate. A number of the brigade, with a party of police con stables, at once set to work, and, after considerable trouble, succeeded in extricating the whole of the poor children. The occupiers of the buildings on either side, apprehensive that their own houses would likewise fall, simultaneously rushed into the square in their night clothes, and were all hospitably received by their more fortunate neighbours. The Chapel and the Mahogany Bar lie in complete ruin, and all that remains of the Albion Saloon is the stage. Mr. Collins estimates his own loss at £1,500. The accident, it is supposed, was caused by the removal of some flooring in the chapel. THE SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE IRON DISTRICTS.--- , A numerous body of the " puddlers" still continue out, and seve ral establishments have given notice to reduce the price of wages to meet the reduced price of iron. The Unionists of the north, as was to be expected, have taken advantage of this state of things, and during the present week delegates have addressed the turnouts at Bilston, and other places in the district, urging them to remain arm in the turnout. It is not a little singular that in some in. stances the workmen in the iron districts are insisting upon an ad. vanes of wages, and in others men are called upon to resist an at. tempted reduction. This anomaly creates considerable confusion, and before any man making inquiries upon the matter of contro versy can come to a Satisfactory conclusion, it is necessary that he should make himself thoroughly acquainted with the exact relative position of the masters and their men. It is certain some of the great 'lnns, owing to the largeness of their stocks, are indifferent to the course which, for th e present, the workmen may pursue; but it is extremely to be regretted that this very unsettled state of the staple manufacture has produced a very unfavourable effect upon the other trades of the distriCt. They are generally elack ; and comparativ* ?racial! COURT OF COMMON COUNCIL. On Thursday a Court was held for the dispatch of public busi ness. TOLLS AND STALLAGE, AND THE ENLARGE- MENT OF NEWGATE MARKET. A long discussion took place on the important question respecting tolls and stallage and the enlargement of New gate-market, as recommended by the Market Committee, but, as the report was referred back to the Committee with additional instructions, we abstain from giving an account of the proceedings until the Committee shall have again re ported on the matters. It is only necessary to mention that Mr. W. Jones, the Chairman of the Committee, informed the Court, in calling their attention to the report, that the limit of the amount which might be required to enlarge the market was 60,0001., and that the following amendment was carried : " That it be referred back to the Committee, with instructions to report the present area of Newgate-market, the space pro posed to be added, the sum estimated to be expended, and the plan of the building intended to be erected." Alderman and Sheriff SIDNEY presented a petition from the Committee for Building and Endowing a Church for the Seamen of the Port of London, for a grant of money to carry that object into effect. He called the attention of the Court to the claims of the seamen upon the community, and stated that the floating chapel long used by them was in a state of decay, and required much repair, and that the erection of a church in the neighbourhood of St. Katharine Docks, for their benefit, would be in every respect highly advisable. Deputy CORNET seconded the motion to refer this petition o the Coal, Corn, and Finance Committee, and said that he had opportunities while a member of the Navigation Committee, of observing that the floating chapel and two other floating institutions on the Thames constituted serious obstructions to the navigation. Mr. ANDERTON was of opinion that the Commissioners of Woods and Forests ought to render such an application un necessary grant of the necessary site, as the seamen, although their services could not be disputed, were a severe burden upon the public. Deputy CORNET informed the Court that the Commis sioners of Woods and Forests had offered to sell ground for 1,2001., which was worth upwards of 2,0001., for the proposed chapel.—(Hear, hear.) Some surprise was expressed that the boating chapels, which had been but a few years ago much preferred as places better adapted to the taste of the seamen, were now yielding in popu larity to the ordinary chapels frequented by the mixed public. The petition was referred to the Committee. PROTECTION OF LIFE FROM FIRE. Mr. D. W. WIRE presented a petition from the Royal Society for the Protection of Life from Fire, " for the pro viding of fire-escapes within the City of London." It stated, that the plan upon which the fire•escapes were constructed had proved more efficacious than any hitherto acted upon or suggested, and that, within the last year, the lives of ten of urf ellow-creatures had been saved by the use of the machines of the Society. He submitted that it would be a difficult matter to add anything to the powerful argument contained in the petition, and moved, without more comment, that it should be referred to the Police Committee, in which he well knew it would meet with the most attentive consideration. Mr. LOTT said that some years ago he had submitted to the Court a proposition on the subject, which, if it had been adopted, would in all probability have counteracted several calamities of a most awful description. He had, after great pains, succeeded in getting the subjeet before the Police Committee, in which 50 models had been examined. He was desirous to knew why the three machines which were constructed upon one of those plans, and whieh were de posited in the Guildhall, to be used by the police, were not now in operation ? He knew that upon one occasion of a fire, a policeman, when asked about the escapes, said he knew very well where they were, but that did not signify, as they were not in his beat.—( Hear, hear.) He wished to know whether the neglect of the machines arose from any disagreement anywhere. At all events, he was satisfied that the interference of some more influential member of the Cor poration than himself would have been productive of the good which he had exerted himself in vain to accomplish. Alderman `Noon said Mr. Lott was much mistaken if he thought the Committee held the plan in low estimation, be cause it was the result of his suggestion ; no such idea ever occurred to them. In fact, there were several difficulties in the case. Of all the plans of fire escapes, there was but one of practical utility, and that was the canvass bag es cape, one of which description of machines had been sent to almost every station-house in the city. But there was no established body appointed to apply them in cases of emer gency or to keep them in a state of preparation. It would be most desirable that they should be in the hands, and under the control of the police, but the Commissioner could not apply the public money under the Act of Parliament, to such a purpose. Now, those who petitioned the Court that day were an established Society, with regularly-appointed officers, who were always on the alert, and the Court would act wisely in rendering them the aid they required for so im portant a purpose.—( Hear, hear.) Mr. R. TairLon could not very clearly see how the Court were justified in placing implicit reliance upon the conduct of the voluntary society which had thus petitioned the Court. They designated themselves a Royal Society, but he could not see what reliance was to be placed upon their stability. He was convinced that the care and management should be in the hands of the police alone, or a body constituted as the police were.—( Hear, hear.) The petition was then referred to the Committee. COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS OF HOL BORN-HILL AND FARRINGDON-STREET. Mr. R. L. JONES brought up the report of the London bridge Approaches Committee, to whom it was referred to examine the allegation in the petition of the inhabitants of the north side of the ward of Farringdon Without, for the completion of the improvements at Farringdon New street and Holborn-bridge, with instructions to report their opinion upon the expediency of carrying out these proposed improvements. It stated that the Committee had viewed the new line of street and the projecting houses on the north side of Holborn-bridge, and directed the Clerk of the Works to report his opinion as to the estimated value of those houses, and also to report the probable amount of the cost of the improvement, deducting the value of the surplus ground; that they had subsequently received reports from the Clerk of the Works, from which it appeared that ex clusive of law charges, the probable cost of completing the line of improvement at Holborn-bridge, after deducting the value of the surplus ground, would amount to 14,500/. That the Committee, having duly considered all the cir cumstances, are of opinion that it was desirable for the City to complete the line of improvement at Holborn bridge by purchasing and setting back the said houses, pro vided suitable means and powers could be obtained for that purpose; and they were further of opinion that an oppor tunity would at the same time be afforded for effecting an additional improvement of Holborn-hill. The Committee, therefore, felt it their duty to draw the particular attention of the Court to the propriety of taking measures to carry out these objects ; and they recommended the same accordingly. That they had caused the vaults to be con structed on each side of Farringdon-street, and had already let eleven of the lots of ground in that street for building leases, and were taking measures that they trusted would ensure future lettings ; so that the whole of the improvement, so far as the City was concerned, might be completed without delay, and they were the more strengthened in that opinion in consequence of the measures in progress for carrying on the new line of street in the county of Middlesex. Mr. JONES, in commenting upon the report, spoke of the necessity which existed for much more extensive improvements in the City of London, and manifested the strongest disposition to proportion the changes in several of the populous streets to the large means possessed by the Corporation and theirin creasing prosperity. The report was agreed to, and, after some discussion upon a subject which was suddenly dropped by the announcement that there were not members enough present to constitute a Court, the Lord Mayor declared the Court adjourned. DISCOVERY of HUMAN REMAINS. A discovery, which has created considerable interest and excitement, took place at Birmingham on Tuesday. A number of workmen, in the employ of Mr. P. Smith, the town survey or, were engaged in sinking what is termed a dome well, at the Public-office, in Moor-street, when about seven feet from the surface of the ground they met with the remains of a large dog. This created no surprise, but immediately beneath the excavators found their work im peded by apparently a large box, but which, upon examina tion, proved to be an oak coffin. On its top was a porcelain pipe, of curious, and evidently antique construction, and an engraved heart, with the initials "W. S." The coffin, con sidering the number of years it is supposed to have been in the ground, was in a state of excellent preservation. Curiosity, as a matter of course, was excited to ascertain its contents, and, upon being opened and examined, it was found to contain the skeleton of a human being, through which, as in past times in the case of executed malefactors, a stake had been driven. The remains were submitted to the examination of one of the medical gentlemen connected with the Queen's College and Hospital. and he pronounced them to be the skeleton of a male, about the age of 25 or '26. The only point presented worthy of observation was an in dentation of the forehead, from which it would be inferred that the deceased came to his death by violence. There are, however, very plausible reasons for coming to a different con clusion. It is not at all improbable that the fracture of the forehead was the result of the violence of the workpeople em ployed in the excavation ; and if the man whose remains are found was murdered, it does not appear likely that his mur derers would have honoured his corpse with an oak coffin, decorated with expensive insignias. Moor -street, in which the remains were found, is now situate in the very centre of Birmingham; but two hundred years ago, at which time, at the latest, it is supposed the body must have been in terred, it formed part of an extensive park, belonging, as some say, to the Jennings family, and subsequently to the ancestors of the present Earl Howe. His Lordship holds extensive property in the neighbourhood at the present time. Meriden-street, Park-street, Jennings-row, &c., constituted a part of the original domain. The probability is that the body found is the remains of some member of the family to whom the estate formerly belonged, and who, as is frequently the case, even in modern times, was buried within the precincts of the family grounds. This view is confirmed by the fact that in Oxford-street, now standing upon a por tion of the same domain, a few weeks ago the workmen employed by the town surveyor met with the skeleton of a man who had evidently been buried for a great number of years, and between whose thighs was placed a large black bottle containing a black fluid. Unfortunately, however, the cupidity of an Irish excavator employed upon the work, who expected to find something to drink, led him to break the bottle, and its contents were never correctly ascertained. It is needless to say that the discovery of the remains of a human being in the immediate neighbourhood of the public prison has led to many vulgar and unfounded surmises. How these notions are to be corrected it is difficult to say, but it is to be presumed that the worthy borough Coroner, who, during his tenure of office, has been most extraordinarily industrious in the discharge of its duties, will find in popular clamour a justification for sitting in judgment upon the discovered bones. THE LATE ELECTION FOR SHERIFFS.—Mr. Laurie who was on last Midsummer-day chosen, together with Mr. Chaplin, to fill the office of Sheriffs of London, and Sheriff of Middlesex, is the nephew of Sir Peter Laurie, with whom he was formerly in partnership in the extensive concern in Oxford-street, and is possessed of a very large fortune. Mr. Laurie lately purchased the Duke of Norfolk's mansion near Hyde-park, and is the owner, in right of his wife, a lady of considerable affluence whom he lately married, of the splendid house called Holcraft's, adjoining the Bishop of London's Palace at Fulham. The new Sheriff, it is said, is a man of extremely active mind, and is determined to perform the duties of the office so as to gratify his fellow-citizens. Mr. D. W. Wire is to be his Under-Sheriff, the appointment of whom has given the highest satisfaction to those benevolent indivi duals of both sexes, who are so alive in the career of reform of unfortunate criminals. SHOCKING ACCIDENT AT DRURY-LANE THEATRE. —On Wednesday evening, immediately after the fall of the curtain at the close of the opera of The Enchantress, and while Madame ThMon was upon the stage, a quantity of the heavy machinery immediately in her vicinity fell with a tremendous crash, knocking down two of the scene-shifters of the names of Kirby and Hathaway. They were Immediately picked up, bleeding profusely, arid in an ap parently lifeless state. A medical gentleman, who was in the houle, Promptly attended, and ordered them instantly to be conveyed to the heipianl. The injuries received by Hathaway were slight iu com parison with those sustained by Kirby, of whom, we learn, it is feared there is little hope of recovery. Not the slightest blame attaches to any OWI in the thwart. DEATH OF SIR WM. FOLLETT. This melancholy event, which had been daily antici pated:during the whole of last week, took place on Sa turday afternoon, a little after three o'clock, at No. 9, Cumberland-terrace, Regent's-park. He had been very restless during the previous night ; his strength was completely exhausted, and, in the course of the day his mind, worn out by suffering, occasionally wandered, as is often the case with persons carried off by consumption. At his decease, there were in the room Lady Follett, his three brothers, Dr. Bright, and several members of Mr. Pennel's family, in whose house he breathed his last. He has left six children. This distinguished lawyer was born at Topsham, near Exeter, in Decem ber, 1798, consequently ho had not completed his 47th year. He was the son of Benjamin Follett, Esq., said to have been a timber merchant, by the daughter of John Webb, Esq., of Kinsale, Ireland. He has left three brothers, and a sister, married to Dr. Bright. One of his brothers is a Chancery barrister, another holds an office in Chancery, and the third is a timber merchant, at Exeter. He was married in 1830 to the eldest daughter of Sir Ambrose Giffard, formerly Chief Justice of Ceylon ; was called to the bar in 1324 ; stood for Exeter, unsuccessfully, in 1832 ; was returned in 1835 for that borough, and appointed Solicitor-General, under Sir R. Peel's short Administration in 1834-35 ; and succeeded Sir F. Pollock, as Attorney-General, in 1844. His abilities as a lawyer, his excellent speeches in Par liament, on almost every subject which properly fell within his department, and his amiable and upright con duct in all the relations of life, are so well known that it is needless to comment upon them. Though a Con servative and something more, for he occasionally unw,llingly followed Sir Robert Peel, he was equally beloved and respected by men of all shades of political opinion, and perhaps the Liberals regret his death as much as his best political friends. It may be a long time before the blank which he has left in the bar and in the senate, but more especially in the office which he latterly oc cupied with so much credit to himself, will be filled up with equal satisfaction to all parties. He will, of course be succeeded by the Solicitor-General, and two vacan-' cies in the representation thus be made, viz., for the boroughs of Exeter and Abingdon. His death will be regretted by his party on another account, for a general belief, and we believe well founded, prevailed that he was destined to fill the office of lord chancellor whenever Lord Lyndhurst should resign the seals. Latterly he had not shown any very strong bias in politics, and we have little doubt he would have been a very impartial and effective chancellor, but judging from some of his speeches to his constituents, it is probable that Sir R. Peel might have had some difficulty in moulding him to his will. We give, as a specimen, an extract from his speech made at Exeter, in December, 1834 ; " We have seen, one by one, all that was respectable for talent in public life, or most respectable in private life, leaving the late ministry, until at last nothing was left but a miserable section who were unable to oppose themselves to the destructive part in the State—who were unable to stand before the storm which they themselves were instrumental in raising. It was evident that they were bending to the storm which must soon have swept them sway, and all that remained of the monarchy and the constitution. Luckily, by the accidental removal from the House of Commons, of the last and must re spectable among them, Lord Althorp, his accidental re moval gave ,he fatal blow to that ministry, and severed the connecting link which held together the rickety machine, which when he left it fell to pieces. What was then to be done ? To whom were the people to look ? To whom were we to look but to the king, the sovereign of our country ? It was for him to act—it was for him to take care that the monarchy should not suffer : it was for him to take care that the constitution should not suffer. He has called around him other men—men whose names are familiar to the country ; a new government has been formed by the king, and the king is now appealing to the country for support. The king can have but one object in what he has done—the sal vation of the constitution, and the safety and welfare of the country. Safe shall we be in moments of political excitement—when danger is abroad—when there is a reckless spirit aiming to upset all that we admire—safe will the country be if we take part with the king, and those who are appointed by the king." THE MEXICAN DEBT. The following correspondence will be read with in terest, though we fear with little satisfaction, by the Mexican bondholders. It is understood that a meeting on the subject will be announced in a few days : " New Broad-street Mews, June 4. " Gentlemen,—We beg to enclose to you a letter from his Excellency the Minister of Finance of the Republic of the United States of Mexico. " Being appointed by the Government of Mexico to act as its agents in this city, we are instructed by the Government to receive from you the funds in your hands which hsve been remitted to you for the payment of the dividends of the foreign debt of Mexico, together with all papers and documents in your hands relating to this agency. " We shall be happy to learn at what time it will suit your convenience to carry these instructions into effect. " We remain, &c., " JOHN SCHNEIDER and CO. " Messrs. F. de Livirdi and Co." " Austin-friars, June 6, 1845. " Gentlemen—We have to acknowledge receipt of your letter of the 4th inst. (inclosing a dispatch from the Mexican Minister of Finance), informing us that you had been appointed agents to the Mexican Government, and were instructed by the 5 aid Government to receive from us the funds belonging to it in our hands, together with the documents and papers relating to the agency. " In reply, we have to state, that from our prede cessors in the agency we received nu papers or documents whatever ; nor have we any others than the books re lating to the conversion of the debt and the payment of dividends, which, being required for daily reference, we cannot consent to part with. " The Mexican Government has been regularly fur nished with the accounts relating to the affairs of this agency. " Credit has been given to the said Government for all the moneys remitted up to the present date, and there is still a considerable balance due unto us from the Mexican Government, which we hope you are autho rised to pay, and in such case we are prepared to furnish you with copies of our account-current with the said Go vernment, made up to this date.—We remain, &c., " F. DE LIZARDI and CO., " P.p. MANUEL J. DE LIZARDI. " Messrs. J. Schneider and Co." " New Broad-street Mews, June 7. " Gentlemen,—We have just received your letter of yesterday's date. " Permit us to state to you that the funds which you are directed to hand over to us can have no connexion with.any account which may be existing between your selves and the Mexican Government. They are funds which have been remitted to you for the payment of the dividends of the Mexican foreign debt. They have been appropriated to that parrose by a special contract between the Mexican Government and the bondholders, effected through your agency, and to which you are parties ; and, being so remitted, they can hare no connexion with any other account or transaction, whatever the nature of the same may be. " We are therefore under the necessity of repeating our request for the payment of this money to us agree ably to the order in your possession. " 1 1 ; e remain, &c., "JOHN SCHNEIDER and Co. " Messrs. F. de Lizardi and Co." " Austin-friars, June 10. " Gentlemen,—We have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your communication, dated the 7th inst. With reference thereto, allow us to say that we do not feel ourselves called upon to discuss with you our reasons for refusing to comply with the request made in your letter of the 4th inst., and in that now under reply. " We have, therefore, simply to refer you to our letter of the 6th inst. for our sentiments on this subject, and remain, &c., " F. DE LIZARDI and Co. " P.p. MANUEL J. DE LIZARDI. " Messrs. John Schneider and Co." 13, Austin-friars, June 21, 1845. " Gentlemen,—The Committee of Spanish American bondholders have received from Messrs. J. Schneider and Co. copies of two letters which they had addressed to you on the 4th and 7th inst., and of your replies to the same, dated respectively the 6th and 10th inst. " From this correspondence it appears that the Mexican Government, having transferred its financial agency in this city to the house of Messrs. John Schneider and Co., bad authorized those gentlemen to receive from you the balance of the funds remaining in your hands for the purpose of applying it to the payment of the Mexican dividends ; that Messrs. Schneider had applied to you, in pursuance of the authority thus lodged with them ; and that you have declined to obey the orders of the Mexican Government for the payment of this money, on the ground that you have claims on that Government to a considerable amount. " The Committee are under the necessity of calling your attention to the circumstances under which these monies have been from time to time re mitted to you. By the agreement dated 14th Sep tember, 1837, under which conversion of the original Mexican debt was effected, which agreement was ef ected through your agency, and bears your signature, together with that of the Mexican Minister at this Court, a certain proportion of the Customs' duties at Vera Cruz and Tampico was set apart for the payment of the interest on the foreign debt. Commissioners were appointed to receive the same from time to time , and to remit those funds to you expressly for the pur pose in question. They have done so ; the di vidends have been from time to time paid by you out o f those funds ; and the sum remaining in your hands is an un appriated part of:the same funds. " That there may be no possible misunderstanding on the subject I extract from the bonds bearing your signa ture the following clause:— " For the better securing the punctual payment of the said interest, the Mexican Government shall appropriate irrevocably thereunto one-sixth part of all the Custom house duties of the ports of Vera Cruz and Tampico (Santa Anna Tamaulipas). This portion of the duties to be received from the administradors of the Customs by two Commissioners to be appointed by the MexicanGovern merit, one of whom to be nominated on the recommen dation of the agents of the bondholders in the city of Mexico. These commissioners to transmit by every English packet to the agents of the Mexican Government in London the aforesaid funds ; the commission to be paid to the said commissioners for this service by the Mexican Government. " The Committee, acting on behalf of the bondholders, are under the necessity of emphatically stating to you, that there is, in their view, no pretence in law, equity, or justice, whereby you ran seek to appropriate these monies to any other purpose than that for which they have been specially remitted to you. The bondholders can have no concern with any other dealings between you and the Mexican Government. You have received these monies under a solemn engagement under your own hands, to apply them to the purpose for which they were sent; and the Committee venture to insist that you have no right to deal otherwise with them. " Under these circumstances, the Committee now call upon you, as you have declined to pay over th• funds re maining in your hands to Messrs. Schneider, to proceed at once to pay the same to the bondholders, as a part payment of the dividend due on the Ist of October last. —I remain, &c. " G. R. ROBINSON, Chairman. "Messrs. F. De Lizardi and Co." " Austin-friars, June 24, 1845. " Sir,—We have to acknowledge receipt of your letter of the 21st inst., addressed to us on behalf of the Com mittee of Mexican Bondholders, wherein you inform us that Messrs. John Schneider and Co. had laid before the Committee copies of their correspondence with us on the subject of the transfer of the Mexican agency. We also learn from your communication that the Committee call upon us to pay over either .to the bondholders or to Messrs. Schneider and Co. the balance of the funds re maining in your hands.' " In our letter to Messrs. John Schneider and Co., of the 6th June, we told those gentlemen that, after giving credit in account to the Mexican Government for all the monies remitted us, there was still a considerable balance due to us, and such being the case, we of course can have no funds to pay over to Messrs. Schneider and Co. or to any one else. " Throughout the whole correspondence which we have had with the Committee, we have constantly and uniformly maintained that the funds remitted us by the Mexican Government were for its sole account ; that we were the agents of the said Government, and not of the bondholders ; and that we could make no payments either on account of dividends or any other purpose without first receiving instructions from Mexico. " We are aware that the Committee have asserted that we were only the recipients of these funds on behalf of the bondholders, but this we always have, and now again emphatically deny. We have always received these funds in the character of general agents to the Mexican Government ; and nothing can more clearly prove that the said Government entertained a similar idea than the fact of the Mexican Minister of Finance giving the order for transferring any funds in hand to Messrs. Schneider and Co., which we apprehend his Excellency would hardly have done had he entertained any doubt as to the funds being the property of his Government—indeed, on no other understanding could we have ventured to make the heavy advances which we have done. " We have also to remind the Committee that when we succeeded in obtaining from the Mexican Govern ment the increased assignment of 3 1-3 per cent. of the custom-house r venues, this fund was charged with the payment to us of a considerable amount ; and we imagine that no impartial person will dispute our right to it. " Since the Committee refer to the year 1837, we think it would be as well that they look still further back, and they will find that, from 1832 to 1837, no thing was recovered from the Mexican Government for the bondholders, and that at the latter period the price of the Stock, with twenty -three overdue coupons, was barely half that which it has borne of late years, and at present. " In conclusion, we have to repeat what we have al ready told Messrs. Schneider and Co., that the entire of the funds remitted us by the Mexican Government have been carried to its credit in account, and that there is a considerable balance still due woo us.—We remain, &c. " F. DE LIZ AUDI and CO. " P.p. MANUEL DE LIZARDI. " G. R, Robinson, Esq." RAILWAY SPECULATION. A return has been laid before Parliament, on the motion of Mr. Gibson Craig, containing the names (with descriptions of the occupations and professions, &c., as well as places of abode) of all persons subscribing to the amount of 2,0001. and upwards, to all railway subscrip tion contracts, showing the amount subscribed by each person for every railway to which he may be a sub scriber, and the total amount of such subscription by each person. The list of the subscribers occupies about one hundred and fifty folio pages of close print, and the names of the railways themselves occupy six columns, and amount to two hundred and nine. We select the names of some of them which have sub scribed for sums of 100,0001. and upwards :- 1. Mills, Francis, Esq., New-street, Spring- .£ ga . rdens 670,300 2. Thomas, William Henry, merchant, Moor- gate-street ... ... ... ... 624,320 3. Smale, Henry Lewis, proctor, Doctors'- commons ... 601,760 4. Tyndale, Charles William, Esq., Brompton 587,780 5. Macgregor, James, banker, Liverpool ... 579,800 6. Murray, Charles Knight, E-1., Notting-hill 574,800 7. Harding, Benjamin, Esq., Wadhurst Castle, Sussex ... 574,760 8. Kirkland, Sir John, Pall-mall 574,760 9. Browne, Robert, merchant, Edge-hill, Liverpool ... 577,260 10. Winslow, Edward, Esq., Torrington square, London 320,160 11. Hudson, George, Esq., York ... ... 319,835 12. Gower, Robert Frederick, merchant, De- vonshire-place 292,000 13. Crowley, Charles Sedgfield, gentleman, Croydon 288,483 14. Hankey, Giwrga, merchant, Mincing-lane 287,400 15. Davis, Richard, merchant, St. Helen's- place ... ... 287,400 16. Rich, Henry, Esq., Mount-street, Gros venor-square 287,000 17. Vigurs, Louis, merchant, Old Broad street, City ... ... 245,000 18. Hornby, Joseph, merchant, Liverpool ... 220,080 19. Manchester and Birmingham Railway ... 200,000 20. Wilkinson, William Arthur, Esq., Cam- berwell . . ... 192.626 21. Jones, Geo., gentleman, Redland, Bristol 192,560 22. Miles, John William, banker, Leigh-court 180, , ;00 23. Goldsmid, Sir batic Lyon, Bart.... 179.500 24. Simonds, Henry, Esq., Reading ... 175,000 25. Stern, Sigismond, merchant, 52, Spring gardens, Manchester ... ... 174 500 26. Tothill, William, merchant, Bristol ... 170,000 27. Marshall, William, Esq., Pens. ortham-hall, _ _ Preston .... •• • ... 167,000 28. Schuster, Leo, 'merchant, Manchester ... 167,000 29. Smith, Thomas, merchant, Reigate-lodge 160,580 30. Chaplin, William James, Esq., Adelphi terrace ... ... 158,320 31. Moss, John, bucker, Liverpool ... 158,020 32. Walters, Gregory Seale, merchant, Cole _ _ man-street, London ... ... 156,000 33. Stevens, Charles, gentleman, Frederick's- place ... ... 155.000 34, Brooks, Samuel. banker. Manchester ... 154,500 35. Garnett, Robt., Esq.,W) verside. Lancaster 154,000 36. Broadbent, Thomas, merchant, Manchester 151,500 37. Gower, Edwin, merchant, Ilanover-terrace, Regent's-park ... 150,000 38. Mercier, Francis, gentleman, Lordship lane, Tottenham ... 148,000 39. Hatton, James, iron•merchant, Salford ... 143,900 40. Gladstone, Robertson, merchant, Liverpool 140.000 41. Maze, Peter, merchant, Bristol ... ... 140,000 42. Smith, John, merchant, Manchester ... 140,000 43. Paul, Charles, banker, Clifton 130,000 44. Waddington, David, gent., Manchester .., 129,770 45. Glyn, George Carr, Esq., Lombard-street 127,520 46. Wright, John, clerk, Westbourne-terrace, Hyde Park ... 121,000 47. Young, Thomas, Esq., Albany, Piccadilly 120,580 48. Mowatt, Fres., Esq., 35, Devonshire-place 120,400 49. Hargreaves, J., merchant, Manchester ... 121,500 50. Houldsworth. Hy., merchant, Manchester 119,000 51. Cropper, Edward, Esq., Liverpool ... 118,400 52. Barlow, Frederick Pratt, Esq., Kensington square ... ... 116,500 53. Hodgson, David, Esq., Liverpool ... 114,400 54. Peto, Samuel Morton, contractor for public works, 47, Russell-square ... 113,625 55. Baines, Benjamin, Holloway ... ... 112,650 56. Whiskin, Jas., Esq., Upper Bedford-place 132,470 57. Davies, Robert. gentleman, York ... 110,000 58. Ricketts, Frederick, merchant, London ... 110,000 59. Roberts, Fred., gentleman,:Camberwell 110,083 60. Smith, Archibald, merchant, Glasgow ... 107,150 61. Tee, Charles, linen manufacturer, Pinder oaks, Barnsley, Yorkshire ... ... 106,480 62. Lawrie, John, gentleman, Charles-street, St. James's-square ... 106,580 63. Saltmarshe, Christopher, Esq., Yorkshire 103,900 64. Learmouth, John, Esq., Edinburgh ... 103,000 65. Humphrys, Ambrose, Esq., 22, Upper Wimpole-street ... 102,700 66. Enthoven, Henry J., merchant, Broad street, City ... 102,500 67. Palmer, Charles John, solicitor, Great Yarmouth ... ... .„ ... 100,820 68. Prinsepp, Henry Thoby, Esq., 37, Hyde- __ _ park-square ... 100,500 69. Aiken, Peter Freeland, banker, Clifton 100,000 70. Walters, Gregory Seale, merchant, 2, Ar- tillery-place, Finsbury ... 100,000 71. Ward, Henry George, Esq., M.P. ... 100,000 72. Anderson, Samuel, Director of the Eastern Counties Railway, Upper Brook street 100,000 73. Egerton, Francis, Esq., Worsley ... 155,000 The total amount of subscription by persons who have subscribed 2,0001. or upwards, to ai.y railway sub scription contract deposited in the Private Bill Office during the present session of Parliament, is 61,603,7071. 16s. Bd. The following contains some of the names of those holding sums under 100,0001.: Ailesbury, Maria Elizabeth, Marchioness of, , Tottenham Park . . ... ... ... 4,933 Als-pp, Thomas, gentleman, 34, Cornhill ... 75,666 Ames, John, 33, Green-street, Grosvenor-sq. 50,053 Anderson, Samuel, merchant, 9, New Broad- . . street, and 105, Park-street ... ... 53,500 Backhouse, Thomas, gentleman, York ... 71,050 Bagshaw, John, merchant, 1, King William street, and 97, Gloucester-place ... ... 87,000 Barclay, John, gentleman, Hornsley-lane ... 70,220 Barnes, George Thomas, gentleman, 48, Moor- gate-street ... ... ... ... ... 52,500 Barnes, John, Esq., 23, Threadneedle-street ... 53,750 Beale, Samuel, Esq., Birmingham ... ... 72,000 Benson, Robert, jun., manufacturer, Fairfield, _ _ Manchester 80,400 Bell, G. Hamilton, F.R.C.S., Edinburgh ... 36,000 Bigg, Charles Richard, gentleman, 19, Bryan- stone-square ... ... ••• ... 47,850 Blaker, John the younger, gentleman, Lewes, __ _ Sussex • • ... ... 61,875 Boothby, James 8., Esq., Twyford Abbey, Middlesex —• ••• ... 88,000 Bradley, William, brewer, Manor Oaks, Shef field ••• ... 60,162 Brassey, Thomas, contractor, Rouen ... 49,750 Browning, J. S., *merchant, Oxford ... Buchanan, George, Stanley, Perthshire ~. 43,250 BUrehell, William, gentleman, 44, Upper Bed- s t,. Vtga lard-plus ..• O. .111 43,640 Bult, James, goldsmith, Cheapside ... ... 40,000 Carver, Edward Turd, Esq., Marlborough __ _ house, Pall-mall ••• •• ••• 60,375 Castleman, Chas., solicitor, Ringwood, • Hants .. 90,000 Chadwick, William, gentleman, 29, Montagu- square . . 64,375 Chadwick, William, Esq., Adelaide-place, London-bridge ... 27,900 Chadwick, William Winter, architect, Albion chambers, Adelphi ... 15,125 Chapman, John, gentleman, Hill-end, Mottram 67,583 Charlesworth, John, bank director, Leeds ... 35,234 Christian, John, advocate, Edinburgh 36,000 Cobb, Timothy Rhodes, banker, Banbury ... 64,200 Cockburn, —, Doune-terrace, Edinburgh ... 36,000 Collett, William Bickford, Esq., M.P. ... 72,500 Cooper, Henry Spencer, barrister-at-law, Paper-buildings, Temple ... 61,781 Cordy, James, wine -merchant, Brighton ... 30,000 Crake, William, Esq.. 10, Stanhope-street, Hyde Park-gardens ... 25,000 Cropper, John, jun., gentleman, Dingle Bank, Liverpool ... 20,000 Cropper, John, jun., gentleman, Liverpool ... 90,700 Crossfield, —, wholesale grocer, Liverpool ... 60,300 Crosby, Robert, merchant, Liverpool ... 40,000 Crosthwaite, John, merchant, Liverpool ... 75,000 Crowley, Edward, Esq., Lavender-hill ... 89,487 Crowley, Henry, gentleman., 9, Suffolk-street, ••• •.• ••• ••• 23,226 De Castro, Hananel, gentleman, 19, South street, Finsbury 60,000 Dodsworth, Geo., gentleman, Fulford, York... 70,475 Douglas, T. D., merchant, Rothsay 57,000 Drysdale, Alexander, merchant, Glasgow ... 54,500 Hardman, Earle, merchant, Liverpool ... 85,400 Ellis, John, Esq., Leicester ... ... 49,000 Evans, De Lacy, Lieutenant-General and K.C.8., 26, Bryanstone-square ... 25,000 Eyre, Vincent, Esq., Lower Berkeley-street... 50,000 Eyles, William, merchant, Leeds ... ... 51,452 Ferras, Josephus, gentleman, Dunsan-terrace, Islington ... 50,000 Fielden, John Taylor, gen tleman, 42, St. Paul's terrace, Islington ... 32,500 Fleming, John, merchant, Glasgow ... ... 70,500 Footman, John, gentleman. Ipswich ... ... 28,750 Forrest, Sir James, Bart., Royal Circus, Edin burgh ... ... 43,000 Fortescue, Matthew, gentleman,Dundalk, Ire- _ _ land ... ... 34.000 Fowler, Henry Robt, clergyman, Harley-street 27,650 Foster; William, Bart., Norwich ... ... 98,840 Franklin, Joseph Lewis, merchant, Liverpool 86.600 Frith, John Griffith. Torringt-m-square ... 40,000 G asking, William, Castlenau Villa, Barnes... 30,000 Geldat. Thomas Charles, barrister, Old square, Lincoln's Inn ... 34,200 Gill, Robt., , Mansfi 11, Woodh.nise, Notts 45.75(. Gladstone, John, Fasque, Kincardineshire. 37,500 r;odlea, Burwoud, merchant, Lewes, Sussex 61,875 Gore, William Ormsby, Esq., Portland-place 23,750 Gower, Abel Lewis, merchant, Castle Inch.. gwyn ••• ••• ••• ••• 50,000 Gower, Robert Fred , Coleman street, London 44,150 Graham, William Lieutenant-Colonel, Mosse kno we, Dumfrieshire ... 26,500 Grant, George, merchant, Liverpool ... 35,300 Grenfell, Charles Pasco, Esq., Belgrave-square 52,506 Grisell, Thomas, contractor, Lambeth ... 73,000 Guest, Josiah John, Bart., Dowlais, Glamor gunshire ... 33,750 Guppy. Thomas Richard, engineer, Clifton ... 60,000 hall, George Richardson, Parthenon Club ... 40,000 Hamilton, John George, merchant, Glasgow... 54.500 Hamilton, Thomas, solicitor, Manchester ... 38,900 Hardy, Simeon, barrister, Fitzwilliam-square, - Dublin ... ... 25,000 Hargreaves, J., carrier, Hart-common, Wigan 63,800 Hazlewood, Fitzherbert, clerk, Rainham, Sit tingbourns ... 25,000 Hawkins, Thomas, gentleman, Thames-street. 32,500 Hayton, Isaac, gentleman, Asbridge House, Tunbridge ... ... 38,616 Hayter, William Goodenough, Esq., M.P. ... 45,500 Head, Sir Francis Bond Waddon, Croydon ... 30,000 Hegan, Joseph, merchant, Liverpool ... ... 81,250 Hemming, John, gentleman, North Bank, __ _ Regent's Park .. 27,000 Henderson, David Gordon, gentleman, Utaion Hotel, Cockspur-street ... 30,000 Henderson, Eagle, merchant, - Edinburgh ... 48,500 Henderson, George, Esq., Southampton ... 47,600 Henderson, Gilbert, barrister, Harcourt-build ings, Temple ... ... ... ... 56,250 Henderson, John, merchant, Erskine, Renfrew- shire ... ... 26,650 Bennet, George, gentlenrin, Duke-street,West- minster ... 30,000 Hennet, George, contractor, Duke-street, Westminster... ... 25,000 Henty, Edwin, banker, Worthing ... 30,000 Henty, George. brewer, Chichester ... 30,000 Hetherington, Wilson, barrister, Lincoln's-inn 22,500 Hill, Rowland, Esq., Brighton ••• ••• 93,656 Hitchcock, George Charles merchant, Broad- street ... 50,000 Holdsworth, Joseph, dyer, Bellevue, Wakefield 27,693 Holdsworth, Joseph. Esq., Wakefield ... ... 42,000 Holland, George Calvert, physician, Sheffield 45,000 Holland, Robert, Esq., 63, Portland place ... 47.133 Holmes, Henry, merchant, Liverpool ... ... 37,950 Hornby, Robert. clerk, W alton-1-- Dale, Preston 41,700 Home, James, Esq., Clapham-common 61,875 Hothana, Geo. Frederick, Capt., RN., Brighton 30.000 Holdsworth, Henry, Esq., Manchester ... 33,000 Holdsworth, Thos. cotton spinner, Manchester 46,680 Hon. William W 3 berg, solicitor, Shrewsbury 68,660 Howard, Sir Ralph, 11.1 3 . 77,160 Haines. Benjamin, Copthal-court ... 50.241 It may be necessary to state that in many instances the parties have signed their names in the character of trustees as representing a great number of persons whose names do not appear, because the rule in regard to railway or joint-stock company registration is, that no party must indicate by his signature his representa tive character. C()() It! t The Queen and Prince Albert, the La(des and Gin tlefnen (,f the royal suite, and the domvsfic attended Divine service yesterday morning in the Chapel Royal, Buckingham Palace. The Hon. and Rev. C Leslie Courtenay officiated. Her Majesty and Prince Albert took their usual early walk yesterday in the royal gardens of Buckingham Palace. Their Royal Highnesses the Prince of Wales, Prince Alfred, the Princess Royal, and the Princess Alice, were taken their accustomed walks and rides yesterday. Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Gloucester visited their Majesties the King and Queen of the Belgians on Saturday at Buckingham Palace. His Royal Highness Prince Albert went on Saturday afternoon to lay the lundation st ,, ne of the new Padding ton and Marylebone Hospital. His Royal Highness was attended by the Marquis of Exeter, Mt-. George Edward A nson, Lord George Lennox, and Major-General Sir Edward Bowater. His Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge visited their Majesties the King and Queen of the Belgians and his Royal Highness Prince Albert on Saturday at Buck ingham Palace. The Queen and Prince Albert accompanied by their Majesties the King and Queen of the Belgians honoured the Italian Opera with their presence on Saturday even ing. The Royal suites included Lady Portman, the Baroness d'Hooghvorst, Hon. Miss Paget, Hon. Miss Liddell, Lord Rivers, Hon. Col. Grey, Major-General Sir Edward Bowater, and Major de Moerkerke. Their Royal Hignesses the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, attended by Lady Augusta Cadogan and Mr. Edmond Mildmay, also honoured the performance of the Opera with their presence. His Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge attended divine service yesterday morning in Kew church. Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cambridge went to Kew, yesterday, returning to town in the afternoon. His Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge honoured Lord and Lady Stanley with his company, on Saturday, at their residence, St. James's-square, at the evening party given by her ladyship. The Earl of Lincoln, Sir Robert Harry Inglis, Sir Charles Lemon, Mr. Alderman Humphery, M.P., and other Commissioners of Metropolitan Improvements, had an interview with Sir Robert Peel on Saturday, at his offioial residence, in Downing-street. Mr. N. Power had an interview with Lord Stanley, on Saturday, at the Colonial-office. Baron de Cetto, Bavarian Minister, transacted busi ness at the Foreign-office on Saturday. The Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England had a meeting on Saturday afternoon at the office in White hall Ylace. There were present the Archbishop of Can terbury, the Bishops of London, Durham, Winchester. Chichester, Ely, Hereford, Lichfield, Norwich, Salis bury, and Worcester, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Earl of Besborough, Lord Ashley, the Right Hon. Sir Georg• Grey, the Right Hon. H. Hobhouse, the Right Hon. John Nicholl, and the Dean of Westminster. Mr. N. P. Willis had an interview with the Earl of Dalhousie on Saturday at the office of the Board of Trade. The Duke of Wellington and the Duke and Duchess of St. Albans attended the early service yesterday, in the Chapel Royal, St. James's. Prayers were read by the Rev. Dr. Wesley. The sermon was preached by the Rev. N. Grenville. The Duke and Duchess of Beaufort, the Marquises of Gra❑by and Winchester, the Countess of Wilton, Lords Gosford, Sandwich, St. Germans, Hawarden, Ingestre, Dillon, and Wrottesley. attended the daily service yesterday in the Chapel Royal. Prayers were read b% the Rev. Dr. H Dakins, the lessons by the Rev. Dr. Vivian. The rermon was preached by the Hon. and Rev. G. N. Grenville. The anthem was, " The Lord is my light" (Boyce). Sir. George Smart presided at the organ. ADVERTISEMENT.]—A HAND AND ARM COVERED WITH WOUNDS CURED BY HOLLOWAY'S OINTMENT AND PILLS !—Thomas Main injured his hand two years ago in the yard at Northfleet, which in a short time began to swell to an alarming extent, and broke out from the fingers up to the elb , lw into several ulcers. Not only was this poor man incapable of doing anything for eighteen months, but, what was worse, he had been dis• charged as incurable from an hospital, attiir being there nine weeks. From this hopeless state has this person been radically cured by Holloway's wonderful Ointment and Pills.—Sold at Professor Holloway's Establishment, 244, Strand, and . by all respectabl e m e di c i ne s e llers th roug hout the civilised world. BRISTOL, SUGAR MARKET, JUNE 27.—After the excitement which has lately existed, and the large amount of business transacted here for the last few weeks, our market—as, indeed, was to be expected—has been rather quiet since our last, and the transactions are limited to about 700 hhds. West India, for which, however, very full prices have been obtained. The supply in first hands does not now exceed 800 hhds., a most un usual circumstance at this- season of the year. In rum and sno 14011.tbe 5151 SY! lalialPortillt..—Bristei Newry. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. NEWCASTLE RACES—(CoNcLuDED). FRIDAY.—On this, the last day of the meeting, the weather was very unfavourable, rain falling neatly all the afternoon. Notwithstanding, the attendance was numerous, and the sport good. The Innkeepers' Plate by subs. of 5 sous. each, 3 ft, with 20 added ; the second to sate his stake. Heats, ODA mile. Mr. Waring's Saul, aged, ist 101 b (Barker) 1 1 Mr. Lamb's Lady Flora, aged, 7st 121 b Mr. Martin's Jemmy Jumps, aged, 7st 101 b Mr. J. Osborne's Old Maid, 5 yrs, 7st 121 b 2 4 Captain Campbell nd Flagon, aged 7st 41b 3 dr Mr. Cook's Zoroaster, aged, 7st 41b 4 dr Mr. A. Johnstone's Sir Henry, 3 yrs, 7st 41b Won easy. The Scurry Stakes, of 2 sous. each, with a Purse added, for all ages ; list 71b each ; Gentlemen riders ; T.Y.C.; were won in two heats by Sunbeam (Mr. Clarke), beating Ellen, Muggy, Middleham, Little Witch, Rufus, Qneen of Hearts, and Speculation (dis.) by a length. The Lark Stakes of 1 sow. each, with 5 added ; 1 Ist each ; one mile ; were won cleverly by Queen of H earts (Mr. Robinson) beating Sunbeam, 1 Ist 51b, and two others. BETTING AT MANCHESTER., FRIDAY. TAE GOODWOOD STAKES.-12 to 1 agst Pine Apples 12 to 1 agst Pythia (taken), 15 to 1 agst the Libel (taken), 15 to 1 agat Lightning (taken), 16 to 1 agst What. GOODWOOD Cur.-8 to 1 agat Ironmaster (taken),- ST. LEGER..-6 to 1 agst Weatherbit (taken), 6 to 1 agst Merry Monarch (taken), 8 to 1 agat Mentor (taken), 10 to 1 agst Old England, 18 to 1 agst Baron, 20 to 1 agst Connaught Ranger, and 25 to 1 agst Kedger. Very little done. LIVERPOOL, JULY MEETING, 1845. The Tradesman's Cup or Plate, value 200 soya., given by the tradesmen of Liverpool, with 200 given from the /lacing Fund, added to a Handicap Sweepstakes of 25 sot's. each ; and 5 only if declared on or before the sth July. (131 Subs. ) age at lb' age et lb Alice Hawthorn a 9 6 Patriot ... ......... ..... 4 6 Faugh-a-Ballagh St. Lawrence 4 6 9 OlAdvice .................. 4 6 Attila . a 6 4 Zanoni 5 810 Marius ................. 6 4 The Era .... 5 Auld 9l .l T u ' vetia. i 5quire........ 44 Discord a 8 9 6 Coranna Pompey 62 5 8 &Little John ............ 4'2 Winesour , 5 8 6 Obscurity ............... 4 ° 6 1 5 Ratan - ..... -, 6 0 The Cure 4 8 5 Saddlebow ...........•- '. A o Lothario 5' g 0 Aristotle John o' Gaunt ..... Aristides . 4 6 ° Trueboy 1 thu, iel ' 4 8 2 Sinbad $ Napier ........ ... .... 5 8 0 Hemp Red Deer 6 0 Pa , thian Mickey Free 6 0 William le Gros Eboracum 5 12 Intrepid The Best-of-Three 4 7 10 Fitzallen .............. 3 5 10 a 510 Valerian Extempore General Pollock 5 7 8 Newsmonger ......••• 8 4 5 Bay Momus 4 7 7 Best Bower 4 5 ~ ' Sorella Baldersdale 5 7 6lStrathspey ........... 4 ;-•„? 7 Morpeth 4 5 Senaiseria.. Armytage Capt. Flathooker 6 7 5 Miss Elis .. - ......... 0 . 3 5 Lightning Barricade Polish Vol au Vent 4 7 3 Ambition .......... 5 4 .... „ What ,D . ' 5 4 Na worth ... a Godfrey Young Lochinvar , 5 7 2 nerton) .............. . . 5 2 Pride of Kildare 47 2 Britannia ............ .. 5 Flamingo 6 7 2 Botanist ............ .... a s 5 2 Doctor Woods 4 7 2 Sir Henry.-- • ...... '. 3 5 0 Rowena ...... . All-round-my-Hat 4 7 0 Clumsy .................. ‘,-!' 412 Blk fby Alfred out of Guano .................. a s 412 sister to Eolus 4 7 0 Extravaganza - .... .. 3 412 The Ironmaster Croton Oil Milton 4 6 12 The Helmsman . . aln Pedometer.... 4 10 Johnny 3 a 66 1 1 0 1 F by by E A m ibe iliu m s ar l e . : . d "" . .. 3 3 410 Morpeth a 6 10 Sis. to Pedometer • ... 3 .4 .4 8 . Telemachus 4 6 IQ Plenitude .. Porto Bello . ..... Dr. Husband ..... 3 4 Dr. Sangrado .. 46 9 Devil's D ust ......... :. 3 4 6 .......... .. 3 Everton Portrait a 6 8 Ruse of Cashmere ... .. 6 1 Brunel Ould Ireland (late Bc by Glaucus out . s, Pickpocket) 3670f It ......... 4pl The Dog Billy Veluti (late Sir Scalteen ............... 6 rd Robert) 4 6 6 Franchise ............... 6 pc__ The Derby Handicap of 10 sues. each, p.1 , - , (52 Subs 3, the Right Hon. the Earl of Derby. One mile. - age st lb with 80 added by age st lb 4 7 Alice Hawthorn 7 0 Attila .. 4 7 0 Discord a 9 0 Patrio t 9 Ratan The Cure 4 8 10 Advice 4 6 4 Trueboy Lothario - winesour 5 8 sJuvenal. . ... 4 6 ~ Philip Semiseris A-la-mode The Best-of-Three 4 ;,' The Poor Soldier 57 8 Sinbad 5 b .5 , 4 Sir Abstrupus ........5 7 8 Cockamaroo .5 6 Porto Bella ....... ... 5 7 8 The Duke of Kest ..• 3 6 Arm ytage 5 7 7 Clumsy . 5 6 Quebec The Pride of Kildare 4 7 7 Anti-Repealer ........• 3 .2 4 Beatrice - Beaumont Polish - Milton Croton Oil p l The Ironmaster Godfrey Sweatmeat All-round-my-hat A Free Handicap a 10 sovs. each, with 25 added, Subs.fo ) yrs olds and upwards. One mile and a quarter. ( 8 ilb age st lb , age 1 3 7 Sir Abstrupus ..... Dr. Husband 4 8 0 Miss Holbrook ••••• ..: 3 6 0 Beaumont ... 4 8 0 Tottenham .. ..... " . 3 6 0 Arcanus PARLIAMENTARY BUSESB°' B, BILL NOTICES GIVEN AT THE PRIVATE nkllC ,-, SATURDAY J U NE 28. Irish Great Western Railway (Dublin to Gal"raY)'--Be ' port to be considered, Tuesday, JUly 1. d rea ding, Runcorn and Preston Brookßailway,— Thir Tuesday, July 1. LIT es' Newport and Pontypool Railway,—Thi r d reading, day, July 1. Tuesdoit Manchester and Leeds Railway,—Thi r d reading, July 1..... BaiIWAY 9 York and North Midland (Harrogate Branch ) ~ Lords' amendments to be considered, Tuesday, MY' '-E-ten - London and South Western Railway (Metropolitan-. sion),—Report to be considered, Tuesday, July 1 . ....zeport , Coventry, Bedworth, and Nuneaton RaiINVSLY, Tuesday, July 1. -....,--- Albemarle , L DVERTISMENT.i—THE EYES.----39t Boas at Piccadilly.—Otical Imovements toAenibaebrenr--- per street an advanced age to read with ease , and to discru.._ nate objects with perfect distinctness,easana A` I v srs• small Acoustic I s ns a tru d ments for relief of extreme deafness, 84°. Th r ee t• Solomons, Opticians, 39, Albemarle-if the Picc n adil ß ly . , have invented Spectacle Lenses, 80,. , o ntig e greatest transparent power. The valuable le in derived from this invention over the Spectacles 11°06d, c ommon use is, that instead of vision becorningstrf ja hated, weakened, and in numerous cases s eriou s f ee d jured, it is preserved and strengthened, and very jos persons are enabled to employ their sight Lensed il Of 11 minute occupation, and can see with those ~tter of much less magnifying power, and that which is u' ire the greatest consequence is, that they do not req uire the frequent changes to further ' helps. Also' Ike-I.°i° a Telescopes, Opera Glasses, Microscopes, 1 °" 1 :: °l e ; 'ble 50 all kinds of Acoustic instruments for relief ° f e-tOrePti deafness. Caution.—Messrs. S. and B. Sol meted ith cians and Aurists, are not in any way connecte , c 1 h"bour person of the same name in their immediate nog t raj hood ; nor in any part of the country. T o preve° t 3 9, takes, be cautious, and observe —Only to be hat g t„l. Albemarle-street, Piccadilly, opposite tie York ______..... - - Ho O d n gs t o h n e 2 0 4 f t a h of June, at B tre SrstHerBs, Clapham-Orara°v' 16 0 0fe n nof t t h hi‘ e e ; r 2 2. 4 H4T t t h hihrro o safo f u J jl une e , r in Spring-street, SuS ''''' sex_garAdos the ,usurgeon, of a son. —ood, the lad o y n o t f h G e bridgeshire, of a son o . r, Esq., dY of On the 24th June, in Upper Wrimpole-street, the la a o , f a a t d w au e g at h o t e e L r. odge, P. J. Salomo of at Aobfbaeys-opnlace, St. John's -Y, o f i 30 J ri r(i o n e h tnt n , euo S f t 22 e a43 : ; iiehan of, 0 ot June,r j i e s On the 22d of June, g at Tphington, nearC3Esti:::::l:eC:illifee .l6 t n h s' Of E J SC III a daughter. 'ail: Camberwell , the :fiers.stNirs:t4i3llltira:n:GlGseal;brhihgot. a i3t u hr g ey h m2 t 6k el rh: 0 f 3. u n On the 26th of i daughter. Li t f ( a ) ° h a i l t di oet,aatsßurgate House, •Igro P' Nutt, of a d On the 27th of June, in Lonsdale-square, Dirs. 1 4 ° /1 ' °t's s°ll in Upper Stamford -street On the 24th ofJune, aliftlrodfliolrEd,llW..Tood, EBCl'9°VrlickgbOenit House, s to Jane, eldest daughter oft e late Joseph ~a Jr, 3. n , of th e th 2 e 4t o h r o d f n j a u n n e e e , D at ep T a o r r T u e a n y t , , Dev w ( g . E. S• .. . ro le, %gi r l to Lucy ndie_ L 2 u sq4 c i inda, youngest daughter of the 13t6 Fitzber e ~oBk : nn :_ro Brooke, e t 11 , R o o f ef c S jt t uo a nr n s e ,ohafativsßetaisfft-henw2er k t a n , c G idl l u o u ri‘c e rbo e s r, t sß e t ao r s tr ihh:i r ts e b . : ru ev . R• folk, to blary, third daughter of W. J• Brereton. Esq., of Brinton• , On the 25th of June, Charles Burls Esq., of Bridge-stfr_eflit' Blackfriars, to Elizabeth, only dauihter of the late 0, Warren, Esq. - W oodside , Oesnhirtel:eLe2w3ids ForfanJkunnne,,ED:r. 111)a.milton-EllO-4 Ch On the 24th of June, in Chadwell-stroct, square, Jane, eldest daughter of Mr. Con care the gildeltoll- On the 24th of June, at Rushington, SursesL, w- - ' wife of George Drummond, Esq• l metes Al a On the 26th of June, at Aiphington, near r,le'"-- ' Caroline, the wife of John Stevenson, Esq. Wilisill l• On the 26th of June, in the Minories, Mr• • 1 Cotton, aged 59. Y . o lo° ' i.uraer, • friattd and Published bif y MURDO ,jo., 112, StranO, Printer, at The Isar Officer oi Strand, in the Precinct of the SaYob 131 the LA" — filidedoexaloudity, SO, 346. MC 14, •13ra2e attended dent -a.I3L Ah B r A ," "na B ey R statthew Joh n 4 0 " klchael T ,H 473 ert Ja ` 44,2 T. 4aa t• 1/ 10 , Wet' GI .. kksvard 11 Wight° . a rnes WI voji n E ar , ' 4 -7.7. Br( ttor.i, m . ' l ••Lester "An MIL It as F i 'Sherrat iolln Oret v. °6 4311 Nu Valutniel p id n lit ilarn SI s-harles J. ' , twig Ada 4 tnuei Al A or ge H a It. Hay ZIMPaon •ti.otriaa 111 ; Leices t ie Burt° kestrs. Ch The list t t r ecl• TI u a Proper BRIE liEr.ter o Lucilo' Share. Ines Gibb and the q ittehard Ri hailwav W nUatn 31( Devon, a: ' n uel Lan panels Fry ItilAvonvon Th ert LCOT ek Bi liard uristopher and &mitt him Da' - qane s B ov South De' Me ea~.E.TARY IC otice Is m Z iv ed subse ' 4 3' the allot 41, Preferen holde rs 01 4 .7 W to two t forthwit ue3 , are hol 1,,A11 the she 7ter, rALI Iq4as Ale Bar l it lion Bet kai;h• flack Mos,sr k es ers, Tory Fizz: Fenz The Drect4 _ tien n th the Ban kin,' of Bo thi, stdyar e„and De 1 4 7,1 ex s:L 4 ly will kilith will 1, th e . Way Con ,11., cr edit of Deny ; such to:° 1 1-11mm ~ Par T i t l ages art e Direct k7:7ement PRI? p ot ;' , , four ott fito t, (l by tt triit, will be h2louCcalpai .sa of ' -444411 and 11 2 1 1 11 E flit GREAT , Fror ,3 aturda N attirda3 SAturda3 Fror, Raturda 3 gaturd a3 F.k i p,ittord a , 4 S , per 4 '4 , 4 Per tos;;,‘ o , 22, Stev ,ttel7.Freigh (111, 441 -Bhi p C ha, Rrighl 4,0* Webb, t i Henn 5i . " 141 / 1 Day ' -Rh ‘ " ? leia an, x',4l. Benin as - ,:n. Th e on,„?aturd ay Lp te sea. ' kge or s e 1 e 0}41411 141 thel ) : e 4 e tr I:ttli 4: r a r h : 4; : gC l atVal l )t. j a Cetb n ° l l : ll 4" oU T s un t lr e Ittti' b r latg e e s ' litie of D I jreet irnit T ' tollBeBti monil Ne ( liners c expen Mr. By Twc And We' DOT We Con Wh We To Con Ano A w ITof Thi. Wh Wit The On. tio,.e New warded, 0 for se l l Pow Wqeri Tagil 13 °• do toci fact ' l nnen ; ter' —9rnlretti O t 111 1 4,,, _ ter, le i ;: ii 4 a eT l / ,"11,1 1ere' tq a ' k and 7 oth T r ove s 1 ) 1, 44(lo. F r"' co ''ekdittao4 T w e._eed Coat "Jillinarett Gotha (),1 11 (inth4 C aAu ti n Voi - "oler e e r , "n do., p 1,,: 111 g 'Fro\ feat '" trmie nrn quaitt -" coat F r , dit to , bi q ek coat t Xt tn , suit Ditto, 'xch4 nged . and Rf kza.l 4 ); jll " h ow At ir n , et ; bet resort or t ' no en "%do. nt dig Pird .l/ * o'clock —6 7 ttl