The Sun. — London, England, 1850-07-20 00:00:00

MANI Ai; trITZ4 .•.*z.,o-tttels DENMARK. By accounts dated Altons, July 16, we learn that—A proclamation has been publhed in Copan-• hag,en, announcing that the Holstein forces crossed the Schleswig frontiers ; their head• quarters were at the town of Schleswig. The Danes have advanced as far as Hadersle'oen. Count Eulenberg, one of the Commission of Admi nistration in Schleswig under the armistice, left Flensburg yesterday to return to Denmark across the Islands. The Russian squEdron was seen yesterday cruising off the town of thittebiiii, a little to the north of the mouth of the Schlei. The Swedish neutral troops were to have marched out of Angelen last night and to-day ; they will be embarked at Flensburg : in the latter town and in Apenrade quarters had already been engaged fur them. Tha intelligence from the Northern Duchy will principally consist of accounts of the movements of troops. The armies are approaching each other. The town of Flensburgh is now nearly the middle point between the respective head-quarters. ITALY. Letters from Turin of the 15th instant state that the Chambers were prorogued on that day. A mes sage had been expected, thanking the Deputies for the support they had afforded to the Ministers, but none was presented. Letters from Milan of the 18th inst. announce that Marshal Radetzky was about to transfer his head quarters to MOUZ.I. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. SALISBUItY RACES.—FRIDAY (CONCLUDED). Tile South-Western Railway Stakes of 5 sovs. each, with 25 added; conditions as for the City Bowl. Heats, one tulle. (3 Subs.) Mr. Elwesn s Elthelstane,lost 131 b ( &fr. Elwes) 0 1 1 Mr. Stullsrd's V7oodsprite, Bst 21b (31b over) 0 2 dr Mr. Elayter's Heather Bell, 3 yrs, .7st 131 b ... 3 dr The first heat was a dead heat, the second won by half a neck, and the third walked over for. GOODWOOD CUP WEIGHTS. Age st lb.l Age st. lb. Collinzwood Chanticleer a 9 7 Vlon'es ' ' Peep-o'-day 80y... 6 9 7,Knight of Gwynne 3 7 4 Canezou Osterley Ellerdale 6 9 31 Windischgratz ... 3 7 4 Cossack Elthiron Borneo ' 4 8 10i Khorassau's dam 3 Justice 5 8 fijiing of Oude 3 Miss Ann Siultz RACES T 0 COME. WWilock 23 Winchester Melmsford 23 Lochdale... 25 Bridgnorth . AU 6 13 6 13 6 8 6 6 Leith laack!ey ?t:puri Worcester Flu atiugtlen lirightun N-)wport 11:4,-Arare Brigh‘oll Race Club Wolverhampton l2 Leinton Park Itc,ading .. . l4 Eoulogue l4 LY. Guildford 26 Goodwood Chewton Mendip 3O Leominster UST. Great Yarmouth 2O Ilsley Plymouth York 2l Barnet ... 2l Stirling 22 Eccles Stourbridgo Derby Taunton Egham... I Canternury 29 Paisley 318F.R. Liverpool H. (Hoylake) 11 Totnea Dover Basingstoke l2 Doncaster Richmond Salford :Manchester Autumn Newmkt. Second Oct l4 Wrexham Newmarket Houghton 2B S EPT E: Warwick 3 \VG:3'month 4 Morpech Lincoln Rochest©r Lichfield Cheadle (Staff)rdAlire) 9 Leicester ll OCTO; Newtokt. First October. 1 Chesterfield . 2 Cher.ter Autumn .. 8 11.)3 al Caledonian, &c. 9 RAILWAY RETURNS RAu.wat Taervic.—The following are the Total Receipts of Rail ways for the past week—that is to say, up to the date to which the respective returns are made, together with the receipts of the same week in the crevionA year:— .. 4 , ,9 Week Last RI c .:3 1 ending NADIE OF RAILWAY. week. F . ;;-..4 ) , O c.. , z..• .....--... - X X July 6 Aberdeen .. .. 12 Amiens and Boulogne. ••.••••. •. • • • • 1,444 1,597 15 1 'Minn 4 , 1•1 Ballymena •• •• - • • • • • • •• G2O 750 14 Birtenhvad, Lancashire, and Cheshire 1,299 1,112 7 Bolton, illacltburii,Clltheroe, and W. Y. 532 445 11 Bristol snd Exeter •• .... • • .... •• - - 5,!16 4.186 7 Ca1e.d0ntin............. ............ 6,521 6,006 14 Chester and ..............3, 34 .... 3,3:34 2,1.51 11 I Dublin and Drogheda• ••• •• 10 i Dahlia and Kingistuivii ............ •• i 1,105 1,152 13 1 Dundee, Penn, and Aberdeen.. •.•• • • u 29 536 14 East Ang1ian........ ............ •. - 725 714 13 i Ediaburgh and Glasgow .... 1 3 - Edinburgh and Perth •• --. . - 14 Eastern Counties and North Eastern 16,825 16,469 14 East Lancashire •• • 5,193 4,893 14 Eastern 1: litoii --••-- • • 13 Glasgow, liiluiarnoc It, and Ayr 13 Glasgow' and Greenuck• •• • ..... 7 Great Northern and E. L 3,123 2,157 13 Great Southern and Western 14 Great Western, Ste ••••• • • • • • 14 Lancashire and Yorkshire ..... . 7 ' Lancaster and Carlisle.• ••• . - • 14 Leeds and Thirsk - Liverpool, Crosby, and Southport.. - - 260 13 Londonderry and Enniski;leu I4G 149 14 London and North Western, 6tc. ..... 50,574 47,046 14 Loudon and Blackwall .. ...... 1,343 1,269 13 i London and Brighton .. ..... 12,166 11,704 14 1 London and South Western. • . ...... 13,325 12,417 14 Manchester, Shedield, and Lincolnshire 6,360 4,113 14 Midland, Bristol, and Blrminghaan -.. 23,341 22,463 14 Midland Great Western (Irish) ...... 1,261 1,204 - 31ouldands ............. . • .... • ... • • - - 14 North British ••.. • ........... 3,312 3,160 13 Paris and Rouen ...• • • • •.•• •....... 7,512 6,377 13 Rouen and Havro .. •• • • ............ 3,1 , 2 2,754 14, I Scottish Central .... ......... _. 1,520 1,350 13 Scottish Midland .. - •.........., .. 453 350 14 Shrewsbury and Chester ............ 1,518 1,419 14 Shropshire Union 463 323 13 South Eastern and Branches ........ 14,615 10,394 7 South Dev0n........ ............... 1,900 1,964 13 Tail Vale .. •........ ..... .......... 2,543 1,952 988 808 13 West Cornwall .• •• • . •_ .. ..... ••• 334 286 7 Whitehaven Junction ............... 206 249 14 York and Newcastle .• • ............ 1 14,595 12,604 14 York and North Midland ........... 1 8,502 8,570 THE ARMY AN]) NAVY. (From the United Service Gazette of this d REGIMENTS FOR FOREIGN SERVICE.—The tollowing infantry corps stationed in Irel,r.d are first on the ros ter for foreign service., viz.: -41st, 47th, 92d High landers, 68th Light Infantry, 55,h, 74th Highlanders, 31 BON, 40th, 2 t B,ttialion Ist Royal, 43i Light Infsia try, 57th, 31st, 71st Highland Light Infantry, 89th, 2d Batt:Atom 60th Rifles, 9th, 35th, and 39:h. _ THE CAVALRY.—"The following regiments stationed in Ireland are first on the roster for embarkation to England, viz.:-6th (Inniskilling) Dragoons, 17th Lan cers, 4th Light Dragoons, 7th Hu3sars, 6th Dragoon Guards, 12th Lsee-:rs, 7th and sth Dragoon Guards. SINDE PRIZE MONEY.—We announced in our journal of the Bth of June, that the unclaimed shares of this booty belonging to the 22d and 28th Regiments had been received at tne East India House; but, we regret to say, that no measures have yet been adopted for the distri bution. This is really too bad, and clearly shows how the interests of the Linesman are regarded by the Lords of Leadenhall-street, when his services are no longer required to fill their pockets and to ads to their ag grandizement. DEPA.ItTuitE OF THE NEPAITLESE PRINCES.--WO un derstand that the Nepaulese Princes and suite take their ileparture from this country about the middle of next month. They proceed to India via France, and the Admiralty have ordered the Commander-in-Chief in the Mediterranean to send her Majesty's steam sloop Growler to Marseilles by the lit of September, to con vey the distinguished Orientals to Alexandria CU route to Nepaul. Tit E YANKEE-CUBAN PIRATES.—The Commander in-Chief on the West India station has ordered the Ber muda schooner, Lieutenant-Commander Jolly, from Port Royal to the Bahamas, to prevent any of the Yankee piratical bands from threatening Cuba, making the islands a, rend, zvous or a depot for arms. True NEW COM3IODIRE Fog TIE EAST INDIES.—A amber officer to Lord George raulec has been selected to sueceed Captain rlunaridge as Commodore and second in command in the East Indies in the person of Captain Lambert (1825), the Admiralty being desirous of having an officer of long standing and experience in command, to meet any unforeseen accident which might occur to the Commander-in-Chief. Commo dore Lambert is the brother of Captain Lambert, who was killed in command of the Java, in an over-matched action with the American f.igate Constitution. Another brother was the lets Vice-Admiral Lambert, who died in 1836 ; and a third, Major-General Lambert, who died a short time since in command at Jamaica. Commodore Lambert commanded the Alig,ator, 23, in the East Indies for f eir yeare and next cemmanded the Endywion, 44; and in 1847 was appointed Commudcre e; Jameica, and served there for a short period. NAVAL FORek:S ON THE LAKES Cr CANADA.—We tt .ted a f,,,w we, , tts since that the nsvtt turves on the 11,3kci ( f Canada had been reduced to one sixty horse steam-veseel, with twenty-one officers and men, Cherokee and Minos, steamers, having nJt only been raid off, but advertised for sale—the former with engines of 200 horse power, for 8,000/, and the lstt-r of 90 horse power, for 3,00 e/. We now bear that the Mohawk is also to be paid of but Lieutenant Herbert, her Com mander, is to re-commis:ion her the fullo sin.. day, wi th a reduced scale of p a y f,n. the crew. We should ' not be at all suprised to hear of some enterprising vagabend like General LopLe, purchasing the Cheroke) and Minos with the view of making a descent on the British banks of the Lakes, or for some other aggressive purpose. How Would the reducing Admiralty answer :o the people of England under such circumstances? STEAM CometterricaTioN WITII AUSTRALIA.—The daily. papees announce " that the contemplated ar- THE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, JULY 20, lB5O. rangements of the Government with the Peninsular and Oriental Company, for the establishment of steam coin munication to Sydney, are abandoned or delayed for some time." We deeply regret this postponement of a measure which would bl of so much advanta::!'e to the mother country, as well as to our exteasive colonies of Aus tralia and New 'Zaland. Why should cur Government enter into a most expensive contract for conveying mails to Brazils—to the dominions of a foreiper-3nd refuse an economical offer to extend our system of steam communication to a most important integral por tion of Great Britain? PRESENTATION CF NEW COLOURS TO THE 82D RE CIIMENT.—These colours will be forwarded to the head quarters in about a fortnight, and are expected to be presented about the middle or latter end of next month. ALLOWANCES TO WARRANT OFFICERS.—The Ad• miralty have ordered that pecuniary allowances are to be made to warrant officers of the navy, when the ships to which they are attached are placed in the royal dock, or in a private dock where fire and light are not allowed on board. -% The Commander of the steam-vessel Lucifer, Lieute nant E. A. T. Lloyd, having had leave of absence grsnted to him to the 11th August, Lieuteaant George M. Jack son (1845), of the flag-ship Ajax, has been appointed by the Commander-in-Chief at Cork to the temporary com m3nd. COAST OF A ERICA. —Her Majesty's sloop Cygnet, Commander White, now fitting at Devouport, is not to wait fir the monthly mail, but is to proceed t ) Sierra Leone and Ascension direct, when she has been paid ad vance and is ready fur sea, and place herself under the orders of Commodore Fanshaw, C. 8., the Commander ,f. AGES OF PUBLIC MEN. (From the North Wales Chronicle.) Born. ... 1 May, 1769 ... 21 May, 1779 ... 7 Nov., 1776 ... 22 Jan., 1777 ... 19 Sept., 1778 ... 11 July, 1779 ... 23 July, 1779 ... 15 Sept., 1779 ... 3 Nov., 1779 ... 21 June, 1780 ... 2 July, 1780 ... 29 April, 1781. ... 1 Nov., 1782 ... 16 Nov., 1782 ... 28 Jan., 1784 ... 20 0,A., 1784 „, 1784 ... 30 March, 1785 ... 12 Jan., 1786 27 June, 1786 8 Aug., 1786 1787 3 Aug. 1791 about 1791 1 June, 1792 19 Aug., 1792 Age. Duke of Wellington ... Lord Lyndhurst ... Lord Dunfermline ... Mr. Joseph Hume ... Lord Brougham ... Lord Hey tesbury Lord Denman ... Lord Campbell ••• Lord Gough ... Earl of liaddington Marquis of Lansdowne Lord Cottenham Earl of Ripon ... Earl of Minto Earl of Aberdeen Viscount Palmerston ... Right Hon. H. Goulburn Viscount Hardinge ••• Sir Robert Inglis ... Sir John Cam liobhouse Duke of Sutherland ... Sir George Clerk ... Duke of Richmond ... Mr. Andrew Rutherfurd Sir James Graham Lord John Russell ... Right Hon. C. S. Lefevre, Speaker of the House of Commons ... Right Hon. Richard L. Shiel Sir Frederick Tbesiger Mr. Duncan M'Neill Sir Francis Baring, First Lord of the Admiralty ... ... 20 April, 1796 54 Sir Fitzroy Kelly ... 1796 54 Marquis of Normanby ... 15 May, 1797 53 Right lion. H. Labouchere 1798 52 Lord Stanley ... ... 29 March, 1799 51 Sir George Grey ... 11 May, 1799 51 Right Hon. T. B. Macaulay ... 1799 51 Earl of Clarendon ... ... 26 Jan., 1800 50 Right Hon. Sir Charles Wood Dec., 1800 50 Right Hon. Mr. Fox Malik) ... 22 April, 1801 49 Lord Ashley 23 April, 1801 49 Mr. J. A. Roebuck ... 1801 49 Earl of Carlisle 18 April, 1802 43 Marquis of Clanricarda ... 20 Dee., 1802 48 Earl Grey 23 Dec., 1802 48 Sir John Jervis ••• ••• 1802 48 Mr. Cobden ... ..• about 1803 47 Mr. Benjamin Disraeli ••• about 1895 45 Duke of Buccleuch 25 Nov., 1806 44 Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone... 1809 41 Right Hon. Sydney Herbert ... 2 Sept.' 1810 40 Earl of Lincoln ... 22 May, 1811 39 Mr. John Bright ... 1811 39 Marquis of ... 22 April, 1812 38 Viscount Melgund ... 19 March, 1814 36 Marquis of Granby ... 16 May, 1515 35 Hon. Georg() A. Smythe ... 16 April, 1813 32 Lord John• Manners 13 Dec., 1818 32 Duke of Argyll ... 20 April, 1823 27 78 74 73 72 1794 1794 1794 about 1795 56 56 56 55 THE GREATEST PATRON OF ORNAMENTAL ART. It Europe (says Mr. Ralph Wurnum) can, at the pre sent moment, very generally congratulate itself on the substantial revival of the arts, this is certainly very greatly owing to the example of is single individual— Ludwig the First, of Bavaria, who has done more for the permanent benefit of taste daring the last quarter of a century, in the small city of Munich alone, than was ever before accomplished, by whole generations of kings, either in ancient or modern times. All the munificence of Pericles and of Lorenzo tho Magnificent combined, would not teach one tithe of the patronage of Ludwig tt.e First, of Bavaria. His works in every de partment t.f art are truly surprising, and all accom plished in half the time spent by Loufs XIV. over the gorgeous accumulations of his one palace at Versailles. During the quarter of a century that he was active, the King of Bavaria raised on an average at least one great public monument every year, and occupied cohstuntly about 200 artists in their decoration—in sculpture, stucco, scagliols, mosaic, marquetry, fresco, and encaustic. I once stool alone, in the magnificent thrune-room of the state-buildings. and could not help exclaiming to myself, " Du I see one only a hundrc d magnificent saloons, its one only of the palaces of the Kin 4 of less than five millions of subiects I then thought of Buckingham-house, and that lumbering piece of Gothic in St. James's: but we are improving; still there is something humiliating in such comparisons, when we reflect that it is not money, but taste, which effects these master-achievements of art. To describe all these great works would require a volume; and be sides these, all material interests have f mild equal care, especially roads and canals,—the first German railway was opened in this kingdom,—and the same king origi nated the German Zolvereic, or Customs Union. if ever a man merited the title of great it is Ludwig I. of Bavaria. It has been said by some that this vast outlay in art was, in fact, unbounded extravagance; but the King of Bavaria could ace much farther than such people. Twenty years ago a stranger was a rarity in Munich. Now it swarms with strangers, pour:ng their hundreds of pounds daily into the coffers of the Munich tradesmen, wno are already reaping the golden harvest which their late enlightened King has sown for them; and Munich now rivals Paris or Rome.—Builder. of Parliament are still in existence to a very wide extent, and that no sufficient remedy has ye., been provided fur their correction. The terms of your Majesty's Commission, and the powers entrusted to us, may indeed enable us, by means of a protracted inquiry, to ascertain a greater number of particular instances of abuses, and to re commend additional cases to be laid before the At torney-General ; but neither are these powers ade • quate to the task of a general and searching investi gation, nor do we conceive that this Commission could ever be made a competent authority for exer cising that permanent and vigilant control over these charitable trusts which seems absolutely necessary for securing their due and regular administration. In support of this opinion we proceed to remark that there are many charities of which the income has been irrecoverably lost for the want of some proper authority to watch over and guard the trust. Many others have been abused and diverted from their proper objects because persons locally acquainted with the circumstances have declined to incur the pecu niary responsibility or odium of instituting legal pro ceedings. In others, again, the trustees are unable to carry into full effect the intentions of the founders, by reason of some legal difficulty, or the inadequacy of the funds for sustaining the expense of an applica tion to the Court of Chancery. In others, an ancient and traditional mode of managing the trust has ac quired so strong a hold on the minds of all parties concerned, that it cannot be expected of trustees to undertake, on their private judgment, any attempt to Teel: the established usage. There is, moreover, a considerable number of charities wherein the present cnal•administration is wholly attributable to ignorance and want of infor mation on the part of the trustees, who, under com petent advice and direction, would be quite willing to correct what is irregular or defective. It appears to U 3 that in order to apply an effectual and permanent remedy to these various abuses and defects it is necessary to create, by legislative enact ment, some public and permanent authority, who should be charged with the duty of supervising the administration of all these charitable trusts. In the foregoing and following suggestions we are supported by the reports of the late Commissions and of the Committee of the House of Commons of 1835. Amongst the necessary provisions of a measure for effecting this object, we recommend that trustees should be compelled to make out annual accounts of their receipts and expenditure. That these accounts should be audited before some local authority. That they should then be registered in some local office, where they may be accessible to public inspection, and that copies of them should be transmitted to some public officer or board, at whose office these accounts and all other information respect ing the various charities throughout the kingdom should be preserved. That this proposed officer or hoard should have authority to institute or direct legal proceedings in such manner, and subject to such control, as Parliament may think fit to provide. That in the event of any local jurisdiction being pro vided for the easier and more economical regulation of charities of small amount, it should be required that all schemes ordered by such a local court be revised and confirmed by the proposed officer or board. We are of opinion that the creation of such an authority as we have described would be the means of saving a large amount of charity property by putting a stop to many actual abuses, either of neglect or misapplication, by advising a better administration to trustees who are willing to be advised, and in many instances by preventing expensive litigation, which would seldom be found necessary when it was gene rally known that any instance of neglect or malver sation would meet with a certain and prompt inter ference. _ _ _ We abstain from entering more particularly into the necessary details of a measure for effecting the general object we have in view, but we venture to suggest that the expenses of the establiahmen: neces sary for the purpose might very fairly be thrown upon the charities themselves, and we find that a tax of only one penny in the pound, upon those charities whose income amounts to 101. and upwards, would provide a revenue of nearly 5,0001. We have already expressed our belief that the ag gregate income of the charities considerably exceeds the sum of 1,209,3951., which we have made the basis of the above calculation. And we humbly submit to your Majesty, that these large revenues, intended by the founders to secure various and, in many instances, important benefits to , the community, demand from the State some better security than at present exists for their due and beneficial administration. Given under our hands and seals, this 25th day o June, 1850. (Signed) CHICHESTER (L.S.) T. IL S. SOTHERON (L.S.) DUCIE (L.S.) JOHN E. BLUNT (L b.) H. VANE (L.S.) JAMES HILL (L.S.) WHAUNCLIFFE (L.S.) HENRY KINGSCOTE (L.S.) FREI,ERICE. L'EEL (L.S.) Treasury Chambers, Whitehall. A report has reached U 3 that Mr. James Wa!lack Mr. Munyard, and Mrs. Clifford, all diod within the past week; they had all been suffering from severe indisposition. FRO 31 THE LONDON GAZETTE OF FRIDAY. CROWN OFFICE, JULY 18. MEMBERS RET ORNED TO SEIM; IN THIS PRESENT PARLIAMENT. Borough of Thvonport—Sir John Romilly, Knight, her Majesty's Attorney-General. Town of Southampton—Alexander James Edmund Cockburn, Esq., her Majesty's Solicitor-General. Court. liirtz-1, otfiend assignee, Ex2tsr; Savery, Mod bury; Bishop and Pius, E:' ter. Timothy Bourne Bourne, cotton hrokor, Liverpool, July 26 and Aug. 29, at eleven, at the Liverpool Dis trict Court. Bird, Oficial assignee, Liverpool; Norris, Liverpool. DIVIDENDS. At the Court, Basinghall-street. J. NV. English, Poultry, chemist and druggist, Aug. 9, st half-past twelve—D. Smith and F. D. Smith, B,vor lane, Hammersmith, wholesale dry salters, Aug. 9, at one —T. J. Edwards, King-street, 13loomsbur3, dressing case maker, Aug. 9, at half past twelve. In the Country. C. Cooper, Wilknhall, Staffordshire, grocer and pro vision dealer, Aug. 21, at twelve, at the Court, Bir mingham. PAYMENTS OF DIVIDENDS. S. Higneet, Midd!e, Shrorhire, malster, Bs. 31, on any Thursday, between eleven and three, a. the office of Mr. Valpy, thrminghatn. J. Yeomans, Sheffield, merchant, 2v. 6d., on any Sa• turday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Freeman, Sheffield. C. Burgin, Sheffield, steel manufacturer, 2r., on any Saturday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Freeman, Sheffield. C. Reinld, Reading, builder, 65., builder, on Saturday next and three subsequent Saturdays, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Groom, Abchurch-lane. W. A. Reeves, Maidstone, cabinet-maker, Bs. 4d., on Wednesday next and three following Wednesdays, be tween eleven and two, at the c.,ffiee tf Mr. Graham, Coleman-street. J. Ford, Richmond, Surrey, licensed victualler, 23. 5d., on Wednesday next and three fullowing Wiedoestisys, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Graham, Culcmani street. J. Addington, London road, Southwark, oil and co- Lowman, 3s. 3d., on Wednesday nest and three follow ing Wednesdays, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Graham, Coleman• street. A. Wilkie), Camberwell, Surrey, 49. Id., on Wednes day next and three following Wednesdays, between eleven and two, at the cffiese of Mr. Graham, Coleman- street. A. Beattie and F. Macnaghten, Nicholas-lane, Lom bard-street, merchants, lid., on Wednesday next and three following Wednesdays, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Graham, C.,lemin-streot. M. Cowles, Nine Elms, and York-road, Lambeth, livery stablekeeper, 25., on Wednesday next and three following Wednesdays, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Graham, Coleman-street. R. Robson, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, manufacturer of plaster of Paris, 2s. 6d., on any Saturday, bet.keen ten and three, at the office of Mr. Wakley, Newcastle-upon- Tyne. J. Barr, Turnstile, High Holborn, and Old-road, St. Pancras, builder, 3s. 3d., on any Wednesday, between eleven and three, at the office of Mr. Whitmore, Basing hall-street. Christy, Adams, and Hill, Rotherhithe, engineers and boilermakers, Is. Gd., on Thursday, the 25th, and fol lowing Thursday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Stansfeld, Basinghall-street. J. Shelford, Standen, Hertfordshire, butcher, 55., on Thursday, the 25th, and following Thursday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Stansfeld, Basing hall-street. _ _ J. Sydenham, Pool, Dorsetshire, printer and book seller, 45., on Thursday, the 25th, and following Thurs day, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Stans feld, Basinghall-street. P. Thompson, sen., Osnaburgh-place, New-road, car penter and builder, 95., on Thursday, the 25th, and following Thursday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Stansteld, Basinghall street. H. F. Horneman, Queen. street, Cheapside, merchant, is. 9d., on Thursday, the 25th, and following Thursday, between eleven and_twe. at the office of Mr. Stansfeld, Basinghall-street. NOTICES OF CERTIFICATES. At the Court, Basinghad-street. S. and H. J. Hogg, Portsea, auctioneers and wine and spirit merchants, Aug. 10, at eleven—C. Searle, Hill street, City-road, timber merchant, Aug. 10, at one—D. Stead, Georgc-street, patentee of wood-paving, Aug. 7, at one—F. Westover, Lewisham, cheeseulonger and grocer, Aug. 10. at two. In the Country. W. Higgs, Wolverhan.p:on, iron dealer and shoeing smith, Aug. 20, at twelve, at the Court, Birmingham. CERTIFICA'T'ES GRANTED. C. 11. Swann, Sandford, J. Swann, Wolvercote, and W. Swarm, Eusham, Oxfordshirp, papermukera—W. Rokerts, Burnham, Buckinghamshire, apothecary= E. Bell, Lambeth-walk, grocer, certificate of the se cond class—J. Darby, Dorset-maws, Dorset-square, horse dealer, certificate of the third class—T. Culling wood, Noneham Cuurteny, Oxfordshire, innkeeper, cer tificate of the second class—J. Brown, Bristol, builder, certificate of the first class—P. Stranger, E. Evans, and S. Cross, Birmingham, glass manufacturers, certificates of the second class—G. G. Mason, Cinderhill, Lancashire, cotton spinner, certificate of the first class DISSOLVED —A. Brown and W. Todd, Liverpool, provision dealers, certificate of the second class, at the expiration of twenty-one r d A y a s f s ro E m its J u ul l y ps ls D .. T. W. Carpenter and J. N. Carpenter, St. John street, West Smithfield, carcass butchers—Jane Hard man, T. Cocksey, and I'. Le, Boltnn.le. Mors, L'incashirp, brass and iron founders—G. Bracher and A. W. Pocock. Old Jewry, biscuit bakers—J. Jay and J. Robinson, Hereford, attorneys—L. J:.ckson and E. M`Donnell, Chaddesley Corbett, Worcestershire, sur geons—E. M'amnell and RS. Penkivil, Chaddesley Corbett, Worcestershire, surgeons —J. Sharp and T. B. Sharp, Maucheste:, iron merchants—J. Sharp, 'l'. B. Sharp, and J. Robins.‘n, Manchester, engineers —E. Grondona and J. B. Naudet, Albany-street, Regent's-park, cooks and confec tioners—J. Wintle and R. Wiutle, Adam-street, Adel phi, wine and spirit merchants--E. Robinson and J. R. Wilkinson, Skipton, Yorkshire, grocers—A. Beale and J. Edwards. Gecrge-street, Blackfriars-road, hat manu facturers —E. Draksfurd and T. Scott, Liverpool, commission merchant,—W. Conway, J. Roach, T. Pilditch and F. Fowler, Plymouth, railway contrac tors (so far as regards W. Conway)—J. Dunstan, W. Duuatan, T. Dunstan, J. Barraclough, J. Barraclough, and I'. Ty as, Union Foundry, Barnsley, York shire, ironteunders (so far as regards J. Dunstan, W. Dunstan, and T. Dunstan)—W. A. Adams and G. All cock, Smethwick, Staffordshire, railway carriage builders --T. Wright. J. Harris, and C. Gooldstraw, Manchester, joiners and builders—Catharine Cooke and Charlotte Sophia Gardner, Bristol, milliners—T. Hirst, R. Bram ley, W. D. Skelton, and H. Skelton, jun., Leeds, wool len cloth ma nufrcturers— S. Wood and W. B. Wood, Macclesfield, silk manufacturers—R. Hickson and E. H o ff, Holbeach, Lincolnshire, auctioneers—J. Pennell and W. Poplar, Liverpool, cigar makers—W. Balding and D. Downing, Tunnel-square, Rotherhithe, Cipher merchants —11. Richards and G. Canwell, Piccadilly, druggists—J. Rowland and W. Rich, New Baud-street, tailors —R. Court and W. Genre, Bridport, Dorsetahire, linendrapers—W. Brindle and L. Clayton, Coke, Lan cashire, boiler makers—T. Morgan, T. Banks, T. Morgan, jun., Kidderminster, Worcestershire, tin-plate manutacturers (so far as regards T. Morgan, sea ) J. H. Wrathall and W. Climes, Eliz s-place, Whit more-road, Holston, and Strand, printing-ink ma nufacturers—J. Grainger and R. Evans, Neata, Glamor ganshire, timber merchant—P. Morgan, J. Pearce and F. Price,egard s A p. be r mo e a v r ; a n ls. w inen aonodd, m woo . slleandu hrn, and r :o p t ers a (so a far as ' r W. Webberley, Stoke - upon-Trent, Staffordshire, manu facturers of china—T. Reynolds and J. Tillcock, ,New Bond street, tailors—J. B. Hunter, A. Thompson, R. Thompson. and R. Morrison, jun., Newcastle-upon - Tyne, ship and insurance brokers, INSOLVENT PETITIONERS. James Robinson, Ward's Fold, Cheshire, boatman. Jelin William Beck, W m or a c n e e s t te e r s , tor bread and biscuit- JT a ti b m o a m e k s e a r s M . J ‘ a v a i i e a l m l C A o r r n d s e o n n , Worcester, W orcestershire, na il-d ea l er . vor estershire, car p o b r a ce m, ster, shopman.horse-fly proprietor. Charles Gallimore, Bire:iNffg button-maker. j W ov i h l en l yi aomir.on t.s l t Yh , ite s , on., Hay - green, Worcester, mine sur veyor. James Pearson, Gosty B ank , Staffordshire. Edward Bent, Brierly-hill, Staffordshire, cowkeeper. Jos:ter. pnhTomlinson, Hanley °3tle Uriali Bailey, Silkstone, Yorkshire, Robert Lloyd, Aspley, Staffordshire, cratemAker. Charles Davis, Birmingham. William Price, Birmingham, schoolmaster. John Davies, jun., Coleshill, Warwickshire, surgeon. Henry Hunter, Birmingham, hairdresser. Adolphus Frederick White, New Ferry, Ch es hi re , schoolmaster. John Prosser, St. Michael, Cwmdu, Brecknockshire, farmer. John Baker, Hay, Brecknockshire. tin-plate worker. John Donovan, Glasbury. Radnorshire. plumber. SCOTCII SEQUESTRATIONS. A. B. Glenday, Dundee, merchant and shipowner, to meet within the British Hotel, Dundee, July 24 and Aug. 14. at one. W. R. Logan, merchant, Glasgow, to meet within the Globe Hotel, Glasgow, July 24 and Aug, 21, at one. eiple, and would interfere with the relay system. But he wished to give notice that at the commencement of the next session he would move for a Committt e to in quire how the relay system had worked. Le wished to enter his protest against the Bill as it then stood, aed he 11;itild for that purpose move that it be read a third time that t;ay six months. But as many of those Noble Lords who agreed with him upon that point were then absent from the Hotve, he should not press his motion to a division, lest he might give to her Majesty's Mi nisters a greater majority than that which they had ob tained on a former evening. Under these circumstances he begged leave to move that the Bill be read a third time that day six month;. Lord HINNAIRD said he believed that the feeling of the operative classes was not so decidedly opposed to the measure as some persons appeared to imagine. He be lieved that the operatives would have no serious grounds for complaint upon the subject if the amendment of the Noble Earl on the cross benches (the Earl of llarrowby) were adopted. The Duke of RICEBIOND said he b lieved tha: 99 out of every 100 operatives were oppesel to the Bill as it then stood. _ Lord REDESDALE said it had been alleged that that Bill had bean framed as a compromise; but he had heard no answer giveu to the question which had been put the other evening—namely, as to who had been the parties to that compromise. lie should certainly like to receive some information upon that point trom her Majesty's Ministers. It certainly would appear from the petitions which had been presented to Parliament that a majority both of the manufacturers and of the operatives were op posed to the Bill as it then stood. Earl GRANVILLE said he had ncver stated that the Bill was a compromis , .. All he contended for was that it was the most practicable mode of settling a very difficult question. Tho Bill was then read a third time. The Evrl of lIARROVVBY then moved an amend ment, the purport of which was that female children should not be worked after six o'clock in the evening any more than" females and young persons. lle confessed that he felt most anxious to provide against the possi bility of those children being detained in factories for hours after their female relatives and other young per sons should have left them. He did not wish to put an end to the relay system; and he thought that a mist satisfactory arrangement might be come to upon that point by the employment of female children in the morn ings, and the employment of male children in the even ings. But he certainly thought it most desirable that fern Ala children should be able to kayo the mills in the company of their female relatives. The Noble Lord concluded by moving the insertion of certain words for the purpose of carrying out the object of his Amendm7nt. The Earl of DARNLEY said he thought that if it we: at all desirable to introduce a provision of that description, it should be brought forward in a separate Bill. lie hoped, therefore, that their Lordships would not support The amendment. Earl GRANVILLE said he believed that if they were to introduce a provision of that description there would be considerable danger that the Bill could not be pa,sed in the course of the present session. The Noble Earl had said that certain evils might arise from their allowin; female children to be employed in mills after the hour of six o'clock in the evening. But those evils were merely hypothetical, and there was no evidence to show that there wee any serious danger of their occur rence. He believed that it was much better that they should confine the operation of the Bill to the specific ob ject for which it had been brought forward. Lord KINNAIRD said he believed that if they were to adopt the proposal of the Noble Earl, they would be removing the only subject of complaint upon which the agitation of that question could henceforth be continued in the manufacturing districts. In his opinion it would be much better that they should at once come to a com plete and satisfactory settlement upon the matter. The Bishop of MANCHESTER supported the amend ment. It waa said that the present was not a ftvour ablo opportunity of pressing that proposal. But it was because he believed that that meauro would for a long Case continue as a settlement of the question that 13 wished to see Parliament pass it in the most satisfs.c- tory shape. The Noble Earl (Earl Granville) had said that the evils of leaving female children in factories alter their female relatives should have left them were merely hypothetical. But he (the Bishop of Manchester) begged leave to differ altogether from that statement. As the Bill then stood, mills might he open from half past five in the morning until half-past eight in the evening. Now, the result of that arrangement would he that female children would be compelled to return home, unaccompanied by their mothers or other female relatives, and would be left to the care of adult males, those adult males being any persons over the age of eighteen. He contended that such a sys tem might be productive of great evil; and he should further say that the comfort and happiness of mothers and of other members of families must to a great extent bo destroyed by the knowledge that they had left behind them in the mills female children, who would have to return home at an advanced hour of the evening without their prottetion. He , implored their Lordships to adopt an amendment which, he believed, would greatly conduce to the happiness of families en gaged in factory labour.—(Hear.) Lord MONTEAGLE said, that although he had voted the other evening against the proposal of the Noble Earl upon that subject, he could not resist the impres sive appeal which had just been made to them by the Right Rev. Prelate • and he should, therefore, vote for the amendment. He Prelate; it to be wise and expedient that they should adopt the amendment, and by that means remove what might hereafter become a dangerous topic for azitation. Lord GRANVILLE having briefly explained, Their Lordships then divided. The numbers were— Contents ... ... 14 Non-contents ..• ••• ••• 30 Majority ... —l6 against Lord Harrowby's motion. The Bill was then read a third time and pasted. The Earl GRANVILLE then moved the second reading of the following Bills, which were agreed to without discussion:—lncorporation of Boroughs Confir mation (No. 2) Bill; Militia Ballot Suspenaion -Bill; Po pulation Bill; Population (Ireland) Bill; Loan Societies Bid; Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Bill; Linen, &c., Manu factures (Ireland) Bill. Several other Bills on their Lordships' table were ad vanced a stage. Lard MONTEAGLE gave notice that on Thursday next he should move an address for the issuing of a Commission to inquire into the state of the law between landlord and tenant in England and Ireland. Their Lordships then adjourned at Twenty-five mi nutes to Eight o'clock. ROUSE OF COMMONS, Jury 19. QUEN'S MESSAGE—GR LATE DUKE OF CAM BRIDGE. On the motion that the House go into Committee on ths Queen's Message, Mr. HUME wished to know what was intended to be done when they got into Committee. He wished the Noble Lord to state to the House gene rally what his views and intentions were, and the 'con ditions upon which he proposed to make the grant. The House was probably not aware that many years ago au annuity of 27,0001. per annum was voted to the late Doke, which he continued to receive up to the time of his death. The allowances to the Royal Family, too, had been greatly increased by the changes in the currency, and on that and other grounds they ought to consider upon what principle the grant should be made. The King of Hanover had most unwarrantably, he thought, continued to receive his allowance of 21,0001. as the Duke of Cumberland, and be had twice asked the House of Commons to recon sider that allowance, but the House, on both occasions, refused to entertain the subject. Besides that allow ance, 250,0001 a year was paid to Hanover as a subsidy, but, according to his idea of the matter, the payment ought to have ceased the moment Hanover obtained an independent Sove reign. Now these were circumstances which ought to be looked to before they made any additional grants, and he bad therefore prepared an amendment accordingly, but he was anxious not to move it if it could possibly be avoided. The House then went into Committee. Lord J. RUSSELL then rose, and said he should confine the observations he had to make to the subject of her Majesty's most gracious message. The question of whether the annuity paid to the present Duke of Cumberland was rightly paid or not under the authority of the Act of Parliament, constituted a totally separate Matter, and the Committee had now only to deal with the case of the present Duke of Cambridge and his sister, the Princess Mary. Now, the late Duke of Cambridge, by an Act passed in 1773, was entitled to part of an amount of 60,0001., which was allowed to George 111., for the purpose of granting annuities to his younger sons. One of the provisions ef that Act was, that none of the younger sons should at any time be allowed more than 15,0001. per annum, while the annuity which fell vacant by the death of one son was to pass to the survivor. Under this Act 6,0001. was added to the annuity of the Duke of Cambridge, and afterwards a further annuity of 6,0001. a year was granted to him. The whole sum paid to the late Duke of Cambridge as an annuity was 27,0001., but by a subsequent Act, passed three years ago, ' an annuity of 3,0001. was settled upon the Princess Augusta, which was to come into opera tion at the death of tho Princess Sophia. The'next matter for the consideration of the House was the case of Prince George of Cambridge. The Honour able Gentleman the Member for Montrose was in error in supposing that there was a settlement made by Parliament of 6,0001. a year on the present Duke of Cambridge. The further question arose, whether Prince George of Cambridge inherited from his father any considerable amount of property. It had been his (Lord John Russell's) duty to inquire into this subject, because there were rumours that a very large amount of property, which was in posses ion of the late Duke of Cambridge, had been left to his children. Those rumours, lie found, had been vs-ry considerably exaggerated. The sum which the ht Duke had lint to his children was divided into three equal portions, between the present Duke of Cambridge and the two daughters of the late Duke, the Princess :al es ' s . lenhurg-Strelitz and Princess Mary; and Prince George of Cambridge was charged with the payment of annuities to the amount of 1,6001. a year during the lives of the persons to whom those annuities were lo ft by the Lite Duke of Cambridge, which would absorb the whole of the third part of the money which had been left to him. All that remained to the prsssnt Duke of Cambridge was the sum of 1,2001. a year, which he would receive in the shape of rent from the estate at Coombe-wood. The House W 9.2 well aware that while it was true that the late Duke of Cambridge did not excecd his income, and that when he was Viceroy of Hanover he made some saving out of his income, it was likewise true that those savings were not to any considerable amount, and that the amount whieli the late Duke of Cambridge bestowed in charity wes sal ways so meutficent us to prevent his amassing any cottselereble fortune. The hest etatement he (Lord J. Russel.) meal make of the situatiou of the present Duke of Cambridge Fray, that, btaides the income he derived from the army, he had no other income except the 1.200/. a year derived fawn the small property of the late Mike of Cambridge. He bad income which he derived from his prof, esional services in the army; but with re spect to the income derived from that source Prince George of Cambridge had always done his duty as a soldier— (Cheers) —and that income was as fairly his right as the income of any officer in the army.— (Cheers.) He (Lord John Russell) therefore came to the conclusion that, in answer to her Majesty's message, the House ought to make some provision for the present Duke of Cambridge.—(Hear, hear.) Now, the question arose its to what that provision should be ; and the precedent to which the Hon. Member (Mr. flume) has adverted is naturally the precedent which occurs—viz., the precedent of the Parliamentary an nuity granted to the Duke of Gloucester. The Duke of Gloucester, the brother of George 111., received an in come of 24,0001. a year. By an Act passed in the year 1778 King George HE. wars enabled to grant to the son of the Duke of Gloucester (the late Duke) an annuity not exc, eding 8,0001. a year. In the year 1806 that sum was augmented by 6,000/. a year, making an income of 14,0001. a year which the Lae Duke ef Gloucester en joyed to the day of his death. The provision made for the Duchess of Gloucester by former Acts of Parliament forms a separate consideration. Before her marriage with the Duke she had an annuity of 14,0001. a year. Considering, then, this precedent, and taking into consideration the position in which the Duke of Cambridge stands, we have to deter mine the ,1110:1 which it would be right for the Minister of the Crown to propose to her Majesty to ask Parlia ment to grant to the present Duke. Now, in consider ing this proposition, it ought to be taken into account that when the late Duke of Gloucester was granted that annuity there were at the same time living several sons of George less than six sons of George 111., enjoying very considerable incomes. The Noble Lord then continued—l say this because it is well known to the country and to the House that a person in the posi don of a Royal Duke has many claims upon him for acts of benevolence and charity, and that while the Dukes of York, Clarence, Kent, Sussex, and Cumberland lived, there were not likely to be so many claims upon the Duke of Gloucester as there would be upon a prince nearly connected with the Throne, and who is, at the same time, the only prince of the Royal Family who is living at the dam, and who is not the son of the reigning Sovereign. That is the position of the present Duke of Cambridge. He is the only prince of the Royal family, except the young princes, the sons of the Queen, who are infants according to law, and who, of course, are not applied to on subjects of this nature ; he is the only prince of the Royal Family residing in England at the present moment. The House will, I am sure, consider that this must make a difference with respect to the claims that will be made upon him—that he cannot well any, " I will use the income Parliament gives me entirely as if it were given for my private advantage, and I will be entirely deaf to all those claims of charity to which my father was so munificent a contributor." I do not think that that is a sentiment characteristic of the present Duke, and I therefore come to the conclu sion than, considering these things and the position in which be is placed, an annuity of 12,000/. a year—being 2,0001.1e5s than that which was granted to the Duke of Gloucester by the Act of 1806, would be a proper. sum for this House to vote for the present Duke of Cambridge. -,-(Hear, hear.) I think it would be a sum which would ()cable him to maintain his present rank, and that it is not at all beyond that which we ought to give him to sustain the dignity of his situation and to answer those claims which are likely to be made upon him. There then remains the case of the Princess Mary. The House will remember that by a provision made a few years ago the sum of 3,000 a year was granted to the Princess Au gusta from the death of the late Duke of Cambridge. I propose that the same sum should be granted to the Princess Mary; that sum would be of course secured by Act •of Parliament, and upon her marriage or her attaining the age of 21 would be absolutely hers for life. The result of this arrangement would be that 6,000/., the jointure of the Duchess of Cambridge, 3,0001. a year payable to the Duchess of Mecklenburgh, and 3,000/. a year to be pay able to the Princess Mary, malting 12 0001. a year, and 12,000/. a year proposed to be granted to the present Duke of Cambridge, would make altogether 24,000/. The sum that was payable to tee late Duke of Cambridge was 27,000/. a year, and the sum, therefore, that I propose now will be 3,000/. a year less than that amount. It is unnecessary to enter into any further details with respect to this subject. Whatever any Hop. Member Las to say upon it does not appear to me to be at all connected either with the annuity payable to the King of Hanover, or to any sala ries granted for civil services. These are sums granted to members of the Royal family to enable Prince George, now the Duke of Cambridge, who has deserved the con sideretien of the House, to keep up the dignity of his rank, and I therefore cannot regard them as in any way having reference to other greets. The Noble Lord then moved the resolution, which he banded to the Chair ' man. It was to the effect that the Committee was of opinion that her Majesty should be enabled to grant a sum of money out of the Consolidated Fund, not ex ceeding 12,0001., to make suitable provision for his Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge. On the question being put, Mr. 11U M.E said he was exceedingly sorry to differ from the Noble Lord on a question of this nature, be cause no man could be more ready than himself to give credit to the late Duke of Cambridge for the prudent and nr management of his affairs, or to testily to the affability and kind-heartedness which had ever distin guislied that Royal Duke. The Noble Lord, however, had not stated the whole of the facts with re gard to George HI. George 111. was allowed 60 000/. to divide amongst ten sous. That was 6,600/. a year to each, and it was pro vided that on the death of one his annuity was to be die vieled amongst the survivor?, with the stipulation, how ever, that none should receive more than 15,0001., for without some such stipulation the last survivor would have received 60,0001. a year. He found that 8,0001. a yeer was all that was granted for many years to the late Duke of Gloucester. The Noble Lord had omitted to state that 6,0001 a year was granted to the Duke of Cambridge for his son, at the same time that a similar amount was granted to the Duke of Cumberland for his son; so that in fact the present Duke had for many years been receiving 6,000/. a year from the country, although indeed it was paid to the father, who received 27,0001. a year instead of 21,000/, which was the allowance of the other brothers. Why should not the Committee adopt in the present case the precedent of the Duke of Gloucester, and vote an annuity of 8,0001.? In 1806 the state of the cur rency led to an increase of all official salaties, and to that of the Royal Duke also. All that had now gone by, and we had now returned to the sober times of bul lion payments. At the same time we were in a state of perfect peace, andnow, if ever, was the period her making retrenchment. Ho spoke as a trustee of the public funds, and he said that he did not wish to see so large a sum taken from the Consolidated Fund when there was so much want and distress around. He thought it would be desirable that there should be an inquiry into the arrangement of the civil list for life on the accession of a new monarch, and whether al end should not be put to the allowance of the Kiag of Hanover, who had for many years been receiving a large sum from this country. He was glad to hear that his Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge had followed his profession of a soldier, and that he was helms, d by the army. If his (Mr Hume's) proposition were acceded to, he would have an annuity of 8,0001. a year; he would also have whatever allowance might arise from his military command; and he would have the one-third of what his father had left; and that he thought, in the present state of the country, would be ample and sufficient. He begged to move, as an amendment, that 8,0001. a year shoud be substituted for 12,000/., and he should take the sense of the Com mittee upon it. Mr. DISRAELI agreed with the Noble Lord, that the proposition ought to be considered on its own merits, and should not bo mixed up with the arrangements pre viously made to the King of Hanover. The Noble Lord was also right in stating, when the House was called upon to consider a message from the Crown on subjects of this character, that there were two considerations laid before them; first, whether any provision should be made for the illustrious person to whom the message re ferred, and if that were answered in the affirmative, then what should be the amount to be considered as a compe tent provision. There were not, certainly, two opinions upon . ,the point that the illustrious individual for whom they were now called upon to make provision, was one for whom Parliament was unanimously of opinion that some provision ought to be made. The Committee should con sider the conditions under which an appeal was made for an English Prince of the Blood to an English Par liameet. The Prince was in a position which permitted of his favourably impressing bis claims on the consi deration of Parliament. It was, for instance, the con institutional jealousy of Parliament which had virtually deprivt d the Sovereigns of these realms of the power of making charges upon their estates in favour of princes of the blood. Therefore, when a prince of the blood came before them tinder the circumstances of the illus trious Duke, they must always remember that that was a consequence in great part of the conduct of the House of Commons. There was another consideration which ought not to be omitted when the House of Commons dealt with a question of this nature—namely, that that House was a party to the passing of the Act which pre vented any prince of the blood from assisting or in creasing his fortune iu any of the ways which were open to other subjects, and when also they considered how much the House of Commons had been concerned first, in the settlement of the civil list, and next in the Royal Marriage Act, they would, he was sure, remember that in reference to every prince of the blood there were peculiar causes which permitted his claims to be urged with gun.: silent. But with regard to the illustrious prince, there were other considerations. The merriage of the late lamented Duke of Cembritlge was one that was very much desired by the country; for on the cceurrcnee . of a most lament able catastrophe it was desired that the sons of George 111. should Lase no time in forming those alliances which should ensure the permanence of the Royal family with which the people of this country as sociated their best inter. ate, nor was it possible they should be insensible to this claims and character of the illustrious individual hiumele He only expressed what everybody felt, that the conduct of the present Duke of Cambridge had endeared him to the best feelings of the country—(Hear, hr are—he had shown himself pos sessed of many qualities which were popular and highly esteemed in this country. and he had led a life both spirited and decorous. With regard to the first propo sition of the Noble Lord, whether the provision was one that ought to ba made, there could les nu want f. f unani mity on the part of the House. To the second question— the amount of that provision—the Hen. Member (Mr. Hume) had addressed himself. It was certainly impos ...............-----_ ..... ------- , , eli=te i . .ible to shat their eyes to great dis:ross walcu, c d sh ot in this eonntry, and though he was rather sty-tee' tot he complaint oi . distress shoald coy INinwbsi• (the edieisterial) •s;•dts of the !loose, attll.circeoe ever were his feelings wider other 0 p ro• stancea, he could not consider the Pr eg e f their position without same reference w the state, ,`_' s d ell cloristituents. The proposition of the Noble Im s B O I funded upon the case of the Duke of Gloueescei, va, upon the whole a more just one could not b es , e . le e c re' s But, above all, her Majesty's Ministers bad w i1 1 '!... 7 0 11° discretion, prudent e and wisdom prPoseds i r e the Duke reduced from that which had been gl ye s oe stbli )ulte of Gloucester. He (sir. Disraeli) e nders' ete rec the reduction had been in consequence of the ' Ot te circumstances of the country; be coald see,n,ooooe' 'Jason for it, and he thought therefore that ta"toeto.• ton ought to have bsen made. Under all t ibe teO e 'r stances de of the ease, thee, taking every poin- i° ,., esr ' ration, and con4.lerina the stile Of the couniq!testlf faro' 0 eially th. oso classes - with " whom they were „ o to o, connected . in that House, it was a fair aed by tr aste' l " immoderate propesition.—(flear. hear.) Isl e 00% then, that although the Hon. Member (x r. s tA " had sugg e r ts eel faithful to his traditionary office, amendment, he would not ieel it his duty to e oil!' amendment to a division, but would rether agstio° the House that under all circumstances the P Fee pro• ,::. the Government was a just, fair, end Lou der° t l l s ' position. Mr. BRIGHT said he was rather disaPPintelt; statement of the Noble Lord in one particular. / ee i t ; d c erstood the Noble Lord to say thst the ,h it : o3 ol l g h b o abrialge had divided his property eclu' l le - ere sf r e children; hut that he had attached to tea be-hieshl son certain annuities which entirely eat ii s " l f tbe 1 :;, Disk„ to 1.600/. a year. The daughter o eti00 ,, , , of Cambridge, on her marriage sal e 1 eat t„; had an allowance from Parliament of 3,004 61.Itaee•!, life.—(Several voices, "From the death of herteeil It was unfortunate that the ro erty left by lb e , illde tabs° father was left in such a miPtinPer that the whe,i% 0 o now handed over to other partiea leaving,,li`4l;l)ollo provided for by the country. lie r• Dt r iee e s net say one word against the late Dake of C tily it se/1r looking to the statements of the Noble Lord , ...of ,I that since 1778 he had been in the receipt of $ e715, 0 1 ' ing, from his share in 60,000/. 21 00 ' , 0.., and latterly, for waxy years, 27evieete9 11 0 e was not aware of t • his receipts e s th t t o l e o Hanov • • er, but Parliament was bound e h e at O r iile out o altogether from its considesation t l ab g e , we a duty to their farailY i n t tbel of a year. t o a nd 0 5 . b ode / 0 as well as in the other degrees, bound to act by theni so as not to throw the eialciat maintenance upon the public when it was t. d P g e sl i „ °11 0 0 1 avoid it. That the late Duke iS Caal,ur' o ildr e ",.,oo therefore, have made some provision for 8",,,e1,, 1 '"05i theist c 0... Ito iri tjot of the large income be derived froze have been but fair, and not to have .", c ud f iii howeveliiriet) e o f manner upon the public. The past , be remedied, but the future could. Ile ( / !.,, r 'eut it!jelli not opposed to some provisioia for the P''; ie solie ce t bridge in case his private pros:P.4ll sad ie tti e jet eli for his station; but the advantages pre' all the fr oir t . 0 might i be purchased at too dear a rate, taree 'e I off t t - i h e is monarchy should, in his opiniotesocier tbe.qtto, nature as not to let them cense O h t 00° 0 4 0 the public in an unpleasant manner for t lut 6 0 104 He o, looked at the fact in this light. The Pro-n--a adoOf , the of this country had a numerous familY• and fo r cV,U,provision would, n 6 doubt, have be e ister e oto d wren of the Queen. Would the Prime 0 4 al e off oach of da even A e a e y n propose or the Parliament grant, il o t (j o bted ai r' 13 :10 01 . Prime cal lnis i t i e e r wouldgr. pprroipgobste) juts C mbridge, howeve-, was only and would Parliament be justified in h g rt : e afte r g 05 01 ,1 sum greater than that which would h e ' e f e re o 'o o ' to her Majesty's own offspring? I ' ther e he e eildi e p . at year each was considered too much Or unjust toberdtll' . the reigning Sovereign, it would be Uni," e eeesiatsilr' jelly's offsprine to ' et as to • L" • ere °. be t a give that b te l t' r'it si 0 Queen II , . e (Mr. Bright) might be taste ot eesPeed . 1 ieg certain opinions on the subject or th e re e t 0 i r/- 0 0s e monarchical institutions htheewasfirst cousin rtl:onbtettliigliieeftbeto quite satisfied that the Minister wile ' 1 ,401 01 ; tr et a .o v m o ca te e o h n d such to i a subject to the eients" be its 'el ion and by its economy. The imp before the v io l be made on the country b the vote bef ° , r a obj e yo el ad wes an unfavourable e yin respect to 't oe gssoe eonsideratifonhaetootiti:7. an tb:riu:or: against the monarchical system ° lt w as O s jeo ll of expense. Though the qaestiou 7 1 p receif s: ,er m e ti . ch of precedent as of piuciple, still 010 6 ', at important. The vote to the Dolt ° 0 4 k ot el' first was only et) 0/ .., w hi c h we e inere"whig le r ees —it was ~I sate tor party puo'es---bY the til e a l ' l the e t ijorree. ment of the day. If that was the eas e ' Lord should have been the last man in, tlitettitr„,?eiei bring such a precedent forward; and °',. l ', - ,, e SO g,o o r e dents that was the last which should ll"'ift.oo, - t el; with Parliament. In his (Mr. 13 ' hes) OP - l oe do/ . rig for t a year was - an Income sufficient' amp be g rail, er of Cambridge, and more ought sufficiently to L e v feel', atiheonse. Looking to these cibrcurestelieseate rig" ( I' make r' some the late Duke of Catabridgerheth 40,°04 income e m p e rovision for his family Due 0 ' "a a bellee' years' he received from the stat; °odic ° ;0 0 that to grant 12,0001. a year would be to Pc"cetO° fi after the children provided tor, ho should support t h e teseencoe-- so ' l a os The House Marquiswas anxious, of GRANBy si id eyed 1:1500 to, late Duke of : 1.16+ was sure, to do them ti°ll 10 1 iou Cambridge—m I .) a d esr •'e v s and natural mode, therefore , ea '---- !I . tes l -107 °gi eh respect was to grant such an allowance o; to tes• e k o l , successor d as would suffice to"ance istictrio imtityand his maintain, u 0 . 4 ,00 e •, unlit} of high station. 1' tr dell el weuld, ever,more _e was assured, be only too 0 .0 1 0 0 encourage • in the pie sent illustrious prince ti' e dsg e t , the v• to inees of his illustrious father, and to eile,-,sitelhe transmit that name and the Of ttl ° ' - tY I 0 memory ew e il o . , unimpaired, to ,the latest posterity. With r e ase hie add. • Awn to the income of Geotle` - re' the Duke of 0 p the 0 made not for party , purposes, hut bacause is, in . Lome v. as insefe • I,,tent. gor fa r had alluded R. INGLIS said the Hon. Mem ber 0 001 V life of f lltaled to the bargain made wi th e e l f °l / her Majesty as a bad h ergal trilifOr country 03 the o v a Jef f sidere ; but he (Sir R. Ingli s), peared iCto be a t'al bargain for tho Cullo".0141100' from returns on the table of the '°,,,-- tb e c.4a .a 1l the be • ginning of the reign III. to V` r of George by t s e , that of William IV, the sums receiveble v? (ta' le duties soael reign from the Post-office, for the wine w o e , ' 70,0001. than 116 6 0 y 0 e 0 4 ,0 r alone), and other sourceisl,l isattio; 1 v St 00/, while the sum granty,,aool, 'l O O O ,Ol iu that period amounted only to 69,p00' of 00,0 ; 4 , balance of 47 O , 00,000/. clear in favour us. f el' c v e €4 O , It that sum were in the hands of t he t for have no • raen tis . need to apply to Paha visio I /9 l ee I n or her children.;es 0 A tij i 4 Colonel RAWDON rose amidst loud cr. t' u- i be o bt di and so much confusion that he could use a f 0610 1 ? heard. s He had known the late Pil l ' e t - I0 Y decljs t a r h o d mhis earliest years—in Hanover Pllal.4o42tOdefr he bore the fullest testimony to hi e , ti „el, t i/- ei l ber • ality and his great char' He su e- 1 ' charity. '0) 0 support the motion of the Noble Lore. . 4 co , A , Colonel CHATTERTON, amidst lel'ocle r d ° fe division and still louder confusion, wil ;A s ,; , p ° lo . d t ; 11 0l say tl that the present Duke of Cam -oi oleo ior . ough knowledge of the Milit a l 6er e°l3°9 the income prop used by the Noble Lora t w t ee ea enough. Ho suggested the sam e gum 4/ sat e Gloucester—viz , 14,000/. a year. I/ - t he 01'P 55 w e The Committee then divided, 11 , , 0 6 4 For the amendment •• $ 0" ... ••• ••• / Against it ••• t i V, Majority ••• ••• ..• ••• tir 1 1 0 0 1 ••• ••• l o t• , 0 o , t The _amendment was therefore • --e se o f )1 Mr. HUME then moved h t th e Tei o s 0 ta, en cot e o f o t 10,000/. a year.—(Cries elrt ..nd° 0 of "Oh 0 " ' • twice the amount of 'f' the e t h e s - 0 0 r e the salary o of 9' 0 ,1 Treasury, who ha ,1 the whole business • 11l ~ r. ee ar ow, attend to.—(Hear, hear.) For many Tee_ e v ies r , ol i •, 1 1 George 111. did not receive so much' chore Offat ir t it' net (Sir R. Inglis) had alleged that ets:011 -I have been better with the Wood' and r ot 0 oiede posal than with the present s atinet On; the list. He (Mr. Hume) begged to refer P-ecoil-solfii to w the debtor and creditor side of th°,l:o `be ( 0 0 ) , oods and Forests, as contained in " for ?oil' c ur Committee, of which the Noble Meeaber o pt tile Duncan) was chairman—(Hear, hearr-yetir! tearcA it t appeared that for the last tvventy-Oee th"'• ea' bad derived little or nothing frnealle t be' Baronet. (Hear, hear.) He Bronet. He was not at all dispo r „ L g e " Lig •° te r.) h e ' Family on so ern: • (m-• h e t ll'ir mous a fond.-- Dele r ,, 4 l o ille Sir '•I 1 • WILLou i goy said that bar be Lord replied ' 6-• per ft of to the Hon. Member, 001001,0$ etete to the Committee whether, in tueheeiel c r sr . , riage of the Duke of Cambridge,'be al'e- es'e t hr so - P i / addition to the 1 9 .0 , J0/.? oot ef e d Lore J. RUSSELL Id rather boo 05 if wou •-,_ av e, 43 A p question at present; he would ouses- or Dote the . allowance to the Duke of Gloneeeter e • tis ayce 0 ,1 r u i n age, was 14,0001., and he did not at P res e llo, ri ge /ti l e under any circumstances 9. greut,°r„,,,bri°olll'," 15 14,000/. per annum the Duke f ki' ..-- ' 0 Li - r ° '.l 0 • 1 0 h 0 nO to __, os it A ; v , hear) With _reference to the Pr'' ci t' e at ato p er„ o o Member for Montrose, he bad ale 7, 2 pl. 40 Y 0/ which induced him to ,c •that 1- -'°° tile.' 1" consider „ to m et e tc r . was not more than a proper allowave: CO O le' e ete Cambridge, and he would not detain tliewevetheserj fa repetition of his views. He would, I W. OO ei ' c i 10 le' opportunity of expressing his appreelativrlee oil forwards the with which his 11011,e'd o oil ! ( the views which he entertein 011,0 ject.—( le a —ear, hear.) , 1 , held it) el, elC ; Mr. • .V. SMITH thought it wool. e°ll,oo„t's tory to the country if the Noble Lo a e r 0 5 ;01"4 clause Dae in the Act granting. the 12,000 t• Poe e e l , AV) l ed Cambridge, providing thiltL e to P o sscl• Hanover illustrious Duke acceding at soy tise f l'l e r,. n • e toiti i l Hanover the allowance should cohere''. f ffriedesi" every year from the public revenue 0 00 trf tt ee t a li source of much dissatisfaction to the r 1 , 0 01 1, 10 el , Mr. HEY W ORTH calved u th e s ' 0 - 0' poll ~,,, o , I ,/ in mind that all this money to co ma re le was 'f / 4 11 ° I d earrings ~f thr , I 1 0 la man t e t 0 i Mr. lIENRY DRUNIMON.I) „id tha ty ( o oo g oo had tint robbed the Crown f its Pr n P er he 11° it l l l/1i 0 be t „ e e e the Queen would at this women ., de r 0 F such l last ended estates as would ' ger." Ceesary to apply te the House for 0 0 rast er the le a i F • /sat amity. 1/7 The Committee divided. The numb... -5 , i 0 Ft r the motion ••• ".• / 5 l b" ‘ 7l) For the amendment ••• ...- 0 e d e t' ll i l e Majority ... ••• •:s . loot r t ss t The resolution was then agreed tot f ll,' e i% 'went c 'es tet i 4 resolution to authorise the pa) 0 ogP 5 4P nuns to the Princess Mary, Mr' '" V P ii should not oppose the g rant. , n ncil t ov 0 1,0' CLERKS INT THE MONT-L„- g afl - (fil o De MENT OF THE Po l. t oo - eer Mr. ANS TEY rose to call the.attOeera to the petition of 138 clerks in t be' 02" CHARITY COMMISSION, 1849. The following is the first report of the Commission appointed last year:— We, the Commissioners appointed by your jesty's Royal Commission, bearing date the 13th clay of September, 1849, to inquire into those cases which were investigated by and reported upon by the Charity Commissioners, but not certified to the Attorney- General, and to report what proceedings, if any, should be taken thereupon, do humbly report as follows: We have, in obedience to your Majesty's corn mends, proceeded to inquire into the subject referred to us. Although our inquiries have been necessarily limi ted to a comparatively small portion of this exten sive subject, we have decided to report upon a certain number of selected cases, which appear to U 3 to re quire immediate interference or regulation. These cases, with the information we have obtained respect ing them, are contained in the schedule annexed to this report, and we recommend that they should be laid before your Majesty's Attorney-General, in order that he may proceed to deal with them in such man• ner as he may judge to be expedient. The number of charities on which reports were made by the late Commissioners is 28,840 ; of these about 400 were certified to the Attorney-General, and about the same number have been, subsequently to the year 1838, the subject of proceedings before the Court of Chancery at the instance of relators or petitioners. We have only a very partial and imper fect record of the eases coming under this last descrip tion, by fire between of 1819 and 1838, owing to the destruc tionthe papers. The 28,840 charities reported by the late Commis sioners, if classified according to income as nearly as can be ascertained from the printed reports, will stand th Ch tl a s ri :— ties, the incomes of which do not amount Ara to ou s / 12 . t p in e g e a t n o ntiin 51. and under lot. 1 . 1 350 0 0000 / 1.1 a aaaa n nuna d addd u buuu n annn d dddd e e under re under 2 513500 0 000 1, / u1 ...... 13,331 4 3 1; : : , 96 8745 04 9641 8 9067 Si s 4 '44 5001. and under 1,000/. 44 1,000/. and under 2,000/. 209, 2,0004 and upwards 56 Total Of these charities it appears that the aggregate COME at the time of the inquiry by the late Commie. sione re was 1,209, 3951 ., and although in some of the smaller charities the income may probably be lost, it hu.s iii other cases been so much increased as to render the p resent aggregate consideri.bly greater than the sum above stated. 7 e proceed to lay before your Majesty some fur ther results of our inquiries, and some suggestions whit th arise from a more general view of the whole matt sr referred to us. In ftadition to the information communicated in answ , sr to our own. inquiries, we have received nume. *u us complaints of mai-administration, and, in many :her instances, our advice has been asked by parties s desirous of correcting acknowledged defects or irreg. alarities. In a few of the most urgent cases, ierein we have felt justified in giving that advice, t l ie result has been satisfactory, and we have reason t. 3 believe! that threatened litigation has been obviated. Fro m these several sources of information it has been m a , 1e evident to us that the evils and abuses Pointed o . at by former Commissions and Committees WAR-OFFICE. JULY 19. 6th Regiment of Dragoon Guards—Ensign and Lieu tenant Charles Thomas Lindow, fiona the Ist or Grena dier Regiment of Foot Guards, to be Lieutenant, vice Phil:1111(3re, who exchanges, July 19. lit or Grenadier Regiment of Foot Guards—Lieute nant William Brough Phillimore, from the 6th Dragoon Guards, to be Ensign and Lieutenant, vice Lindow, who exchanges, July 19. 4th Foot—Captain William Augustus Fyers, from the 40th Foot, to be Captain, vice Arthur, who ex changes, July 19. 11th Foot—Ensign Philip Doyne - rigors to be Lieute nant, by purchase, vice Paulson, who retires, .July 19. 15th Foot—Staff Surgeon of the Second Class Thomas Rose Dyce to be Surgeon, vice Dobson, promoted on the Staff, July 19. 18th Foot—Captain Abraham Parkinson Kenyon, from the sGth Foot, to he Captain, vice John Bruce, who retires on half-pay of the 56th Foot, July 19. 21st Foot—Ensign Robert Harkness, from the 71st Foot, to be Lieutenant, without purchase, vice Robert Nicholson, cashiered by the sentence of a General Court Martial, July 19. 37th Foot—Ensign Robert Mark Flalyburton, from the 68th Foot, to be Ensign, vice Henry, appointed to the BGth Foot, July 19. 38th Foot—Captain Napier Turner Christie, from half-pay, Unattached, to be Captain, vice Thomas Southall, who exchanges; Lieutenant William James Iftue to be Captain, vice Christie, who retires; Ensign Ctsrles William Watkins to be Lieutenant , by purchase, vice Loftus, July 19. 40th Foot—Captain Frederick Leopold Arthur, from the 4th Foot, to be Captain, vice Fyere, who exchanges; Ensign Frederick Samuel Blyth to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Cormick, promoted; William Hickes Herndon Messenger, Gent., to be Eusign, by purchase, vice Blyth, July 19. 56th Foot—Lieutenant Allen MiDonald has been per mitted to retire from the Service by the sale of his com mission, July 19. 65th Foot—Lieutenant Christopher Rhatigan to to Captain, without purchase, vice Smith, deceased, Dec. 14, 1849. 71st Foot—Lieutenant Frederick J. Colin Halkett to be Captain, by purchase, vice Dashwood, who retires, July 19 ; Ensign Robert Charles William Stuart to have the rank of Lieutenant, .July 18 ; Ensign John Fuller to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Halkett ; Ensign Duncan Downie Fletcher, from the 421 Foot, to be Ensign, vice Harkness, promoted to the 21st Foot, July 19. 723 Foot—Captain John William Gaisford to be Major, by purchase, vice Maclean, promoted in 34 West India Regiment; Lieutenant Walter Barrington Odynell Campbell, to be Captain, by purchase, vice Gaistord; Lieutenant Lydaton Newman to be Captain, by purchase, vice Lord, who retires, July 19. 3d West India Regiment—Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Maxwell Maclean, from the 72d Foot, to be Lieutenant-Colonel, by purchase, vice Perry, who retires, July 19. HOSPITAL STAFF.—Deputy Inspector. General of Hospital 3 Charles St. John, M.D., to be, Inspector- General of Hospitals, vice Henry Franklin, who retires upon half-pay; Deputy Inspector-General, with local rank, Andrew Ferguson, M.D., to be Deputy Inspec tor-General of Hospitals, vice St. John; Surgeon Wil liam Dobson. from the 15th Foot, to be Staff Surgeon of the First Class, vice Fergusson; Surgeon Alexander Gibb, M.D., from the 45th Foot, to be Staff Surgeon of the Second Class, vice Dyce, appointed to the 15th Foot, July 19. UNATTICHED.—Brevet Major Guy Clarke, from the '7th Foot, to be Major, without purchase, July 19. BREVET. To be Majors in the Army—Captain Napier Turner Christie, of the 38th Foot, Nor. 23, 1841; Captain Charles Eustace Mac Donnell, of the 29th Foot, March 2. To be Majors in the Army in the East Indies—Captain Herbert Benjamin Elwardes, of the Ist Bengal Euro pean Regiment, March 22; Captain henry James Stan nut, of the sth Regiment of Bengal Cavalry. April 17. Commission by the Lord-Lieutenant of Fliotahire. The Hon. Richard Thomas R"ley to be Deputy- Lieutenant, July, 12. Commission by the Lord-Lieutenant of Lancashire. John Abrahalii Tiune, Esq,;OceDepUt;:i.;;;;nt, July 12. BANKRUPTS. Thomas Dyson, railway contractor, Newington, to surrender Aug. 2 awl Sept. 6, at hall-ptst one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Whitmore, official assignee; Eixon and Son, King William street. Gilbert Finlay G;:dwo3d. chemist, Maida-hill, July 26, at twelve, and Aug. 29, at half-past twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Johnson, official assignee, Ba- Llwrance and Flews, Old Jewry. sin G z ll eo a r li st eS re h e e t p ; heard, linendraper, Modbury,Devonshire, July 30 and Aug. 27, at eleven, at the Easter District IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, July 19. COUNTY couwrs EXTENSION BILL. On the motion of Lord BEAUMON r, the report on this Bill was received, and the third reading was fixed for Monday. The Vestries and Vestry Clerks Bill passed through Committee. FACTORIES BILL. Earl GRANVILLE moved the third reading of this Bill, and did not feel ca'led upon to enter again into the arguments which had ben so often repeated in the former stages of the Bill. The Puke of RICHMOND moved that it be read a third time that day six months. He was at a loss to isumpraieni the conduct of those Noble Lords who op poiel him, and who, although they admitted that the operati on o f the existing Act , while it had been in force, had been productive of the greatest possible benefit, still were for altering it so as to lengtnen the hours of labour. Under the Bill as it then stood tho dinner hour of the operatives should be deferred, and the Consequence of that would be, he feared, that they would ‘ be driven to the beer-sho p s for a stimulus. Their Lordships must know by experience that it was not very agreeable to have people's dinner hour put off, and he always perceived that a greater number of peers left the House at halt-pat seven o'clock than at any other time.—(A laugh). Oa a former occasion he had thought it his duty to oppose the proposal o f his Noble F r i en d on the cross beaches (the Earl . of liar rowby) fur extending the operation of the measure to children, because the adoption of that proposal would be equivalent to the introduction of an entirely new prin-