The Sun. — London, England, 1850-06-13 00:00:00

fourtt Vtittion SUN OFFICE, Seven O' Clock. ASCOT RACES• DAY. -7 -BY EXPRESS.) (Continued from our Third Edition.) The St. James's Palace Stakes of 100 OM each. Old Mile. Nutcracker Sergius Mickretoti .. .2 ... 3 The New Stakes of 10 sovs. each. T.Y.C. Citadel ... Heart of Oak Buckhound ... 2 ... 3 FRANCE. Several conflicting rumours of a novel character have sprung into existence regarding the grant of additional moneys to the President. One report is to the effect that the Committee strongly recom mend the postponement of their report on the mea sure until at least six weeks shall have elapsed, the object of such delay being to allow the excitement caused upon the subject to subside. Another report is that a portion of the Cabinet has agreed to a compromise to this extent, that the debts incurred hitherto should be paid off, but that the al lowance should still continue as hitherto. Some of the members cf the Cabinet may certainly, it is true, consent to this compromise, but the Prince himself has already distinctly avowed his determination to consent to ne compromise at all,—no compromise of any kind whatever. His debts arose principally from his munificent charities and benefactions; and it would appear that even in the last journey of the President to St. Quentin his expenses in deeds of beneficence have amounted to nearly 20,000 f. He presented, in savings bank pass-books, to the industrious workmen of St. Quentin, 3,000 f. ; to the well-conducted workmen of various manufac tories, 1,500 f. He gave to the charitable fund of St. Quentin I,ooof. ; to the Mayors of two come !Runes at La Fere, the inhabitants of which were reduced to misery by a fire, lighted, perhaps, by some frere egare, he gave 500 f. each. The Mayors had implored him for some assistance for the bouseless families of the sufferers—in all 49. To the charit able fund of La Fere he gave 500 f. He gave 500 f. to a postilion who, while in the act of driving, fell to the ground and broke his legs. He gave 500 f. to an unfortunate man who at tempted to destroy himself by means of poison, being driven to despair by poverty, and with a wife and four children starving. The money was given to support the family during the time the father is in the hos pital. To the escort that accompanied him, horse and foot, he gave 2,500 francs, making about ten sous for each man. The President received during his stay not less than 500 petitions, and none of the petitioners were sent away empty-handed. If to all this you add the most ordinary and necessary exp-nses to postilions, c(mehmen, conductors of the railway carriages, &c., it will be seen that the sum of 20,000 francs, already mentioned, is not more than what was actually ex pended, and in this expenditure there is little or no thing extravagant. One anecdote of his journey not yet mentioned de serves commemoration :—During the review at La Fere a National Guard stepped out from the ranks and taking off his rap cried out " Vive l'Empereur and another stalwart looking fellow advanced and shouted " Oui , oui, et tout de suite." SCHLES WIG. The head•quarters of the Danish troops in Jutland is moved to Kolding ; part of the Life Guards had arrived there, and the Whole corps was to follow in a few days. The Swedish neutral troops have received orders to be in readiness to march. The officers state that the present corps will be relieved by another. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. (THIS EVENING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. Their Lordships met at Five o'clock. PETITIONS. Lord MONTEAGLE presented a petition from bankers and merchants. of Aberdeen, and a petition from Arbroath, complaining of the arrangements of the Aber deen Railway Company. Lord CAMPBELL presented a similar petition from Cupar, in the county of Fife. SOUTH-EASTERN RAILWAY. On the motion that the South-Eastern Railway (Amendment of Acts, Power to raise Additional Capital) Bill be read a third time, Lord MONTEAGLE presented a petition from Mr. Josiah Wilson, a shareholder in the company, com plaining of certain malpractices on the part of the three tors, and praying to be hoc d at the bar of the House against the present measure. The petitioner alleged that the directors had jobbed in their own sl arcs with the funds of the company, and as the prayer of the peti tioner could not be acceded to, the Noble Lord proposed to insert a clause giving the Board of Trade power to appoint au auditor, 51aould the majority of the proprie tors consent to that course. Lord BROUGHAM said he should certainly resist the proposal of his Noble Friend. Lord REDESDALE gave it as his opininion that to insert such a clause as that proposed by the Noble Lord would be contrary to the standing orders of the House. Lori MONTEAGLE insisted that they had no right to give this company power to raise 1 200,000/. more without taking sons guarantee that the money should not be applied to jobbine, pus poses. Lord REDESDALE said the insertion of the clause would be tantamount to throwing the Bill out altogether. Lord MONTEAGLE reminded their Lordships that two years ago Sir Hubert Peel inser,ed a similar clauSe in the Bill of a railway company who had been guilty of similar mal-practices. He moved the adjournment of the debate. Lord BROUGHAM contended that there had been no jobbing in the instance complained of by the peti tioners. The transaction was an open and honourable one, notwithstanding the money came out of the funds or the company, and it ultimAtly proved beneficial to the shareholders. Lord HATHERTON said the t. ansaction in fact was supported by the shareholders themselves, who agreed to it in general meeting assembled. Earl GREY said, al'hough he approved of the spirit and intention of the clause, he thought it was too late to introduce it at this stage of the meaiure, and he must therefore resist it. After some further discussion the amendment was negatived, and the Bill was read a third time and passed. THE COUR r OF CHANCERY (COUNTY PALA- TINE OF LANCASTEit) BILL. This Bill was read a third time and passed after a protest from Lord Campbell, who considered the Bill wholly unnecessary. (LEFT SITTING.) HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER took the Chair in the New HOUSe a' Four o'clock. THIRD READINGS, &c. The following Bills were read a third time and almed: Kent W aterworks. p Oxford,. Wptoorcrr. and Wolverhampton Railway. Soutbsal gationatcrworks. Tyne Navi The following Bills, is amended, were considered and agreed to:— Borough of Salto Lancashire and Yorkshd Wa terwo r k s and I mprovement. a i The Manohester Bonding Itlaya. read a second ti me , ordered to be committed. was PETITIONS . Sir JAMES DUKE presentedi:n a Petition from the parish of St. Giles's in favour o f equalization of poor rates; also sev:ral petitions from v a ri ous puts of the metropolis in favour of the Marriage Bill. Mr. JOHN WILLIAMS presented a p e ti t i on from a in favour of international a l . pp lace in Denbighshire Eitration. Mr. IiiACKENZIE presented two petitions from Ren f rewahire against tne Marriage Mr. WODEHOUS gresentedapetitionfr from aa o lae uer in Norf o lk p ra yi ng f o r t oe abol i tion of Sunday in the Post-office. An HON. Mcunnn presented a petitionfromß omford, in the ci;nnty of Essex, praying to! protection . Mr. FITZROY presented a petition in favour of the County Courts Extension Bil!. Mr. W. PATI'EN presente d a pet i t i on from a body of clergymen connecte d .w i t h t h e Established Church in favour of the Bill for amending the Church Rate Act. Sir WILLIAM CLAY presented a pet i t i on f rom t h e Tower Hamlets in favour of the Marriage Act. Mr. B. DENISON presented a petition from a p lace in .Yorkshir e against the Highway Rate Bill; also seven teen petitions from various parts of the West Riding in favour of the Marriage Bill. Mr. HOBROUSE pr, rented a petition in favour of the Copyhold Enfranchisement Bill, Mr. E. ELLICE presented a petition from a place in Scotland in favour of the Marriage Bill. IF V iscount CABTLEREAG presented a petition from an Irish congregation against the Marriage Bill. Mr. WYLD presented two petitions from different Parts of the metropolis in favou r of the Bill. S ruART W OR TLEY p a large resented number of peti t i ons f rom various parts of the country in fav our o f the Bill. • Lord R. GROSVENOR presented seven petitions from various parts of the metropolis to the same elket. kr. P. SCRAPE persented a petition fro m a place in Roscomm on i n favour of a district union rat e . Lord DUDLEY STUART presented a petition from the Society for the Protection of Trade, signed by the chairman; in favour of the County Courts Extension Bill. Mr. C. PEARSON presented a number of petitions in favour of the Marriage Bill, and two petitions from he. Lambeth Savin gs B anks against the Savings Banks Bill Sir GEORGE PECRELL presented a petition from the Brighton Swrins Banks to the sam e effect. THE S:r DE LACY EVANS presented a petition from Westminster in favour of the Marriage Bill. Colonel LLOYD WATKINS presented a petition from the trustees and managers of the sayings' bank at Breeknock against the Bill for the amendment of the laws of such banks. Mr. DISRAELI presented a petition from the parish of Wickham, in the counties of Bucks and Ox:ord, complaining cf the refusal of the Poor-law Board to sanction the redaction of the salaries of their officials. STEAM-ENGINE IN PALACE-YARD. Mr. GREENE rose to ask Viscount Ebrington whe. ther there was any intention of erecting a steam-engine at the corner of Palace-yard for the purpose of forcing the contents of the sewer to a higher level. If there be such intention, whether it was proposed that such steam engine shall permanently remain, or is it only to be placed there for a temporary purpose; it for a temporary purpose, how long may it be probably required to remain there? He would ask whether it was the intention of the parties in charge of the engine to stir up the contents of the sewer at this hot season of the year ?—(A laugh.) Lord EBRINGTON said there was an intention of erecting a steam-engine in Old Palace-yard. The drainage of the Westminster district had been long under the consideration of the Westminster Commissioners of Sewers with a view to its improvement. The object for which the steam-engine would be erected was for the purpose of bringing the sewer in St. Margaret street up to the level of sewer in Great George , street. With regard to the second question, be could ante that the engine would rennin until the sewer was finished, and it would then be removed and the ground made good. The Commissioners had had great complaints that the sewer was unavoidably necessary. Mr. HENLEY said, that the Noble Lord had not condescended to say what means the Commissioners had taken to preserve the inhabitants of Westminster against the effects of the stench of the sewer which he was about to stir up. Lord EBRINGTON said be did not know that any but the ordinary precautions had been taken. It was obvious that if the works were to be retarded during the summer months, the progress of sewerage in the metro polis would be indefinitely postponed. Sir B. HALL wished to know if the Board'had ever considered that the dog-days -were the best season for opening these sewers? Ile also wished to know whether the matter had been brought before the Board of Health? Also whether it was necessary that this sewer should be opened at the present time? and finally whether the sewerage of the present House of Commons.was de ' fective? Lord EBRINGTON said he had already explained the necessity of opening the sewer. With regard to the drainage of the Houses of Parliament, he did not consi der that the sewers were satisfactory in their construc tion, but the architect (Mr. Barry) and the Com suit:eos of the House had to deal with them, and nut the Commissioners of Sewers. He did not think they had been constructed on the best principle on which they ought to be constructed ; they were a great deal too large to allow the sewage water to be carried off rapidly; but, as he had said be• fore, they were not made under the direction of the Commissioners of Sewers. Sir B. HALL said, what he wished to learn was, whether the sewers made under the superintendence of the architect were on so low a level as to render it ne cessary to pump up the whole sewage water in the neighbourhood. Lord SEYMOUR said he was not in possession of sufficient information on the subject to give a definite answer to the question of the Hon. Baronet. Lord ASHLEY said the Commissioners of Sewers were at present sitting on three cesspools, which we un derstood him is state were considered necessary to obviate the evil.—(Ltueho r.) BERMUDA. Mr. HUME moved for a return of the several public establishments at Bermuda, on the Ist day of January, 1850, stating the liaise and rank, pay and allowances of every kind, of the garrison; also, the number of officers of every class, civil and military, under his command, in detail, stating the name, the office held, the duty to be performed, the p and allowances pf every kind re ceived by each officer; and the amount of contingent ex penses of:every kind incurred, so as to exhibit the total cnarge of the garrison staff and establishment (the troops excepted) for the )eer ended de 31st day of December, 1849 : similar return of all officers, civil and military, belonging to the Ordnance department, &c. Similar return of all officers, civil and military, belonging to the Naval and Vietnalling depart ment, stating the number of hulks and vessels, houses and buildings for their use, and the total charge for the year ended the 31st day of December 1849. Similar return of the Medical department, and the number of hospitals and buildings for their use, and the total charge for the year ended the 31st day of December, 1849. Returns of the troops, infantry, artillery, pioneers, and marines, on the Ist day of January, 1850, distinguishing the number of each rank, and included in any of the previous re turns. Of the number of convicts at Bermuda, on the Ist day of January, 1850, th e num b er o f hulks and barracks for their reception, and the establishment of all classes maintained for them, and the aggregate charge in the year ended the 31st day of December, 1349; and, of the total amount of revenue collected at Bermuda in the year 1849, stating the several sources, and the amount derived from each source ; also, a return, in detail, of the manner in which the revenue for that year was appropriated.—Agreed to. BOARD 01? HEALTH. On the motion of Mr. MOWATT the following re turn was agreed to:—Copies of the reports of any engi neers or surveyors, together with the plans and sections, and estimates of cost, upon which the report and recom mendation of the Board of Health are founded, for sup ing the metropolis with water from Bagshot-beatb. I'HE STEAM-ENGINE IN OLD PALACE-YARD. Lord ARUNDEL and SURREY said, with reference to the conversation which had taken place about the steam engine in Old Pelace•yard, it appeared there was a strong feeling egainat the impropriety of erecting such a machine for disturbing the* sewerage ; and as the Noble Lord, the Chairman of the Cum miis oners of Sewers (Lord Ebringtou) did not feel disposed to remedy the nuisance, he (Lord Arundel and Surrey) hoped the Secretary of State would take tome steps to protect the House against it.—(A laugh.) Sir Si. Grey joined in the laugh but made no further response. THE RAILWAY AUDIT BILL. Sir G. GREY moved the first reading of the Railway . Audit Bill. SUNDAY TRADING BILL Mr. BARING WALL asked the Hon. Member for Lambeth if he would consent to postpone the second reading of the Sunday Trading Bill till Friday week?iii Mr. C. I'EARSON said that, providing that he could see some opportunity of t•ringing on the Bill on Wednes day week, he should have no objection to postpone the Bill till WedneSday week; but otherwise, at this late period of the session, he could not consent. COUNTY COURTS EXTENSION BILE The House then went into Committee on this Bill; Mr. BERNAL in the chair. The AT i ORNEY-GENERAL proposed several ad ditional clauses, which were ordered to be brought up. Sir J. GRAHAM said that he had to make the same complaint that he had made yesterday; be could not hear a single word of what was going on. He wished to call the attention of the Government to the evidence which had been given before the Committee on this Bill by a gentleman in the Treasury -office. He understood that these clauses were respecting the clerks to the judges in the county courts, and he was very strongly of opinion that these clerks, though they were ap pointed by the Judges and approved by the Lord Chan cellor, should be under soma general superintendence, say of the Secretary of State for the time being. He thought that the opinion of the country had been pretty loudly pronounced in favour of the extension of these courts. There were many other suggestions of very great importance pointed out by the evidence, but he would not dwell on them, because, as the law now stood, the executive had the power of carrying them out. He un derstood that a commission of five County Court Judges had been appointed by the Government, to consider what alterations in the practice of the courts might be advis able. As to the present clause he would suggest that the Attorney-General should carry it a little further. Sir G. GREY said he believed that great inconveni ence had resulted from the mode in which the clerks were appointed, because some of them resided in London, and, therefore, were obliged to be represented by depu ties who were sometimes very efficient, but the (Govern ment had no power;of interference except in:cases of mis conduct. The commission to which the Right Hon. Baronet had alluded; was appointed under the Act passed last session, and it was . the intention of the Executive to adopt any alterations in the practise of the courts which they might think necessary. In reply to Sir JAMES GRAHAM, Sir G. GREY said the suggestion to diminish the number of places where cases were tried was under the consideration of the Uoverrment. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in reply to Mr. B. Denison, said it was his intention to produce a general clause to dismiss clerks for misconduct rrosooawin o f The the AT TOR NEY - GENERAL p sai d . in consequence s, t made to hi m , h e proposed to leave out ths cis be ettfouto allow fund that Parties to serve their o wn summonses, as utr whi c h h e h ad been induced to in- Practice would give rise to considerable ir G. objections. Sir pE CHELL sai d although th e A ttorney- General spoke on his ai d e of the House he had scarcely Mr. ear, hea r .) heard allwuomrdEutstaeirdedhebTti shoinaf.o--u nd it impossible to hear shouldonl retire to the speech he had a word, and suggereed that they old H o use„—(Hear, hear.) n e heard was that of the Right Hou. o nl y y net opposite (Sir J. Graham) Mr. GOULBURN said it was rather singula r, but a l t hough he heard the Attorney General, he could not h. ar Sir James Graham, notwithstanding he sat behind him.—(Laughter.) Sir JAMES GRAHAM said if that were so, it was owing;entirely to the:defective construction of the House. Members could hear what passed on one side but not on the other, end such being the case it was impossible to go on with business in Committee.—(Hear.) Mr. STAFFORD said he took great interest in the Bill, but was in the same predicament as the other Hon. Members.— ( He ar.) The ATTORNEY GENERAL sai d at p resen t as the Act was worded, if a party. laid his p laint, a nd served it upon the defenduot, even though the de fendant might not intend to make any defence, the plaintiff was obliged to go into court with his case, .and incur all the expense of proving it, even though it was an undefended plaint. He now meant to propose a clause the object of which was, whether the defendant was served with a plaint or not, if he knew a suit was about to b e i nst i tuted he might w i th the p l a i n tiff agree about the a mount of the debt and enter that agreeme ntin writing with t h e c l erk of the Court, and thereupon the Judge should proceed to hear and dispose of the cause. SUN, LONDON, It would be a most ec nornical measure, and he (the Attorney-General) thought it would be a satisfactory one Mr. FITZROY objected to the clause, on the groun that persons personating a plaintiff, or defendant, migh impose a statement as to the amount of debt on the clerk of the court. The clause was agreed to without a division. The ATTORNEY- GENERAL proposed another clause imposing certain conditions on the plaintiff and defendant, in case they agreed as to the amount of the debt.--Agreed to. Mr. HENLEY offered some objection to the clause. After a few words from Mr. DENISON, The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that he would consider the matter, and make some amendment in the clause on bringing up the report. Clauses G. H., relating to the appointment and dis missal of clerks and assistant clerks, were then agi eed to atter a short discussion, in which Mr. Aglionby, Sir G. Grey, and Mr. Mullins, took part. On clause 1, which provided for the hiring of town halls and public buildings for the holding of the courts, The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that this clause had been brought under the attention of the Hor. Mem ber for Liverpool, and that Hon. Member had drawn up a clause which he proposed to substitute for his own. Mr. HENLEY agreed with the principle of the clause, but thought some words ought to be introduced to pre vent any expense falling on the county in respect to the repairs requin d, in consequence of the town-hall, or other county building, being used by these courts. After a short discussion the clause was agreed to. The other clauses proposed by tae Attorney-General were then put and agreed to. Mr. MITCHELL then rose to propose the following clause:—Be it enacted, that nothing contained in this Bill shall take away the power of the judges of the .upe iior courts to make, or shall interfere with the exurci:4 of their discretion in making, orders for holding de fendants to bail in actions commenced in the Superior Courts for claims not exceeding 50!; and that when, in any action, any such order shall remain, the provi sions of this Act shall not apply with respect to such action. (LEFT SPEAKING.) COMMON LAW CAUSE LIST. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH. MIDDLESEX CAUSES FOR THE SITTINGS AFTER TRINITY TERM. Rewanets. Cahill. v. Macdonald, stayed—Rewe v. Cope, ditto Davies v. Wilkinson, ditto Williams v. Whiteway, injunction Bastone and another v. Ross, ditto Fiddes v. Toogood, ditto—Crowther v. Edwards, ditto Berke v. Parish and another, stayed Moon v. Connop, ditto—Clerk v. Hughes, injunction Neal v. Ward, ditto--Clutzerbuck v. Carter, ditto The Queen v. Johnson and others, ditto Ghislin v. Gregory and another, ditto Dean, &c., of Christcrhurch, Oxon, v. Hicks, S. J. Simmonds v. Simmonds The Queen v. South-Eastern Railway Company, S. J. Barker and another Y. Cleobury, S. J. Daniel v. Callis and - another, S. J. Countess de Salts and others v. Bagley, S. J. The Queen v. Edwards and others, S. J. Walker and others v. Hindley and others, S. J. Foskett v. London and Blackwell Railway Company, S.J. King v. Cannon, stayed The Queen v..Rabett and others, S. J. Gilliegham and others v. Kendall, S. J. Brown v. Sargent and another, injunction Robson v. London, Brighton, & South Coast Railway, S. J. Tayleur v. Lennox, S. J.—Le Comte v. Brie, S. J. Connop and another v. Burge, S. J. Lock v. Wilts, Somerset, an d Weymouth Railway Com pany, S. J. The Qut en v. Saunders and others, S. J. Swanger v. Gardner—Blaue v. Bingham, Esq., S. J. Rackham v. Wright, S. J. The Queen v. Baron Dunboyne, S. J.—Same v. Same, S.J. Doe dem. Rackstraw v. Rackstraw, S. J. The Queen v. Bryer and others, S. J. Thomp.on v. Young, S. J.—C hadley v. Homan Duke of Brunswick v. Harmer, S. J. George and another v. Curlewis Collinson v. Westoby, S. J. Cobb v. Hakewill England v. East Anglian Railway Company, S. J. Betts v. Walker and another, S. J. Harris v. Bainbridge, S. J.--Simms v. Marry sat, S. J. Doe dem. Parkinson, Nash, and others v: Moreing, S. J. Great Northern Railway Company v. Pada ick, S. J. Waterford, Wexford, and Dublin Railway Company v. Logan, S. J. Harrison v. Evelyn, S. J. Paul v. Cochrane and another—Morris v. Cooper, S. J. Gray v. Webb, S. J.—Gray v. Bowes, &c., S. J. Mackenzie v. Gillen, S. J.—Perkin v. Collinsun, S. J. Lister v. Warrington, injunction Seymour (pauper) v. Maddox The Queen v. Phillips and others Walker v. Lawrence and another—Wright v. Taylor Nash v. Waterford, &c., Railway, S. J. Gallini v. Earl Courtown and others, S. J. Wolton v. Freese, S. J.—Burton v. Wilkins Barber v. Curling—Gardner v. Allen Doe dem. Rolfe v. Tizzard, S. J. The Queen v. Phillips and others, S. J. Burghea v. Campbell—Quallett v. Barwell James, Esq., v. North West.-rn Railway Company. S. J. M‘Gri gor v. Galsworthy —Hobbs v. Barnard, S. J. Archit , 2cts', &e., Insurance Company v. Wilson, S. J. Doe dew. Cotton v. London and Blackwell Railway Company, S. J. TI son v. Lendall—Hancock v. Bewley, S. J. Brown v. Glenn and others—Holloway r. Bentley, S. J. Turner and another v. Venables and another Corr (pauper) v. Cole—Hoare (pauper) v. Todd Heathcote v. Gordon, S. J.—Dunne Y. Lewis Wilcocks v. Walker—Boyson v. Jones—Clay v. Edge Pfeil and another v. Merchant and another Blackstone v. Hargreaves—Knight and another v. Maule Westmacutt v. Flint, S. J. New Causes. Krause v. Reicl , enberg, S. J.—Dryden v. Fryer, S. J. Ritchie v. Preston, clerk, S. J.—Mallon v. Slater, S. J. Robinson v. Shaw—Davies v. Maker Yelland v. General Commission, Ship, Loan, and Insu rance Company Scott and another v. Pilbeam Mitchel and another v. Lewis—Whalley v. Glover The Queen T. Cohen and another—Fowler v. Williams Oste . rman v. Bateman—Sturges v. Bowie Doe dem. Hunter, Jackson, and others, v. Beaumont Morton v. Bentley—Burgh v. Richardson Head v. Sanderson, S. J. Pugh and another, executors, v. Jenkins Harries v. Howlett COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. MIDDLESEX CAUSES FOR THZ SITTINGS AFTER TRI NITY TERM. Remanets. Stead v. Williams, S. J. Fearn v. Countess Waldegrave, S. J. Bluck v. Boys, S. J. Burke v. Parkgate, Chester, and Birkenhead Railway Company, S. J.. Rennet, the younger, v. Fitzgerald, S. J. Demster v. MgCurdy (first sitting in Michaelmas Term) Pudney v. Long, S. J. Newnham v. Stevenson and Wood, S.J. Doe dem. Goodwin v. Joyce, S. J. The Queen v. Mill, S. J.—Wills v. Mills, S. J. Munciay. v. Stubbs—Warner v. Cabbell and others, S. J. Warner v. Cabbell and another, S. J. Same v. Randall and another, S. J.—Same v. Large, S.J. Eastern Counties Railway Company v, Jackson. • Heath v. Unwin, S.J.—Freeman v. Remmett Hamilton and another v. Terry Hargrave v. Hargrave, S. J.—Clarke v. Martyn, S..J. Adron v. Barnett, S. J.—Carden v. Woolley, S. J. Tesnent v. Palmer, clerk, S. J. Jones v. Hutchinson, S. J.—Cross v. Gaskell, S. J. Lloyd v. Baldwin, S. J.—S. Wright v. Wilcox Smith and another v. Lovell—Haley v. Bosley, S. J. Cross and another v.Cross, S. J.—West v. itaxenclale,S.J. Casey v. Ditusdale, S. J.—Morris v. Gardener Young and others v. Twymin Doe dem. Colesworth and others v. Miller T. G. Philpotts v. J. Philpotts and another Jorden v. Elliott—Smith v. Whittaker, S. J. Hopper v. Smith, Knt., S. J.—Longmore v. Bussey Weller v. Soh werder—Reynolds v. Hambrook and others Sanguinetti v. Eaton (withdrawn)—Smith v. Fraser Dobson v. Tourniaire and another Fry and another. v. Bromley, S. J. Thompson v. Chancellor New Causes. Wiele v. Enthoven (commission). Simmons v. Booth and another, S. J. Doe dem. W. Hale Y. P. Galvin.-I:tigginson v. the Com missioners of the Lord High Admiralty of the United Kingdom, S. J. Stovell v. Potts.—Bunting and another v. Lewis. E.q., S.J. Doe dem. Burrell, v. Davis.--. Cook v. Gaskell, S. J. Upton v. Webb and another. • Pritchard, executor, v. Bagshaw and others. Gibson v. Bolton.—Walker and another v. Elder, S. J. Proper t and wife v. Tregear, S. J.—Doe dem. Burrell and another v. Bond.—Nathan v. Cleland and Brown. Jackson v. Eastern Counties Railway Company. Hinde v. Morris and Rose. • Doe dem. Verge and others v. W. 11. Beale. Lewis v. Bentiug and another. R. Booth (pauper) v. George Clive, Esq. Crater v. Chapman. Mitchell v. Kye. and another v. Thompsoa and others. Jones Bridger and others v. Cosleff. Langdon_y. G. B. Hildebrand, S. J. Buttingeig v. Booker and another.—Fisher T. Smith, S. J • W. Bourn v. A. Mays. • Williams and another v. Woodward. T. Peacock v. W. Jenkin. Sir J. Hare, Knight, v. C. Fletty: J. Morgan v. Styles.—D. Ahern (pauper) v. C. Gotham. Wads v. Hughes,—Davis v. Burrell and another. Marshall v. the York, Newcastle, and Berwick Railway. Denby v. Blora.—Cook v. Scott.—Boyee v. Black, clerk. Clossman and another v. Same. Percival (pauper) v. Druke. Ambrose v. Mitton.—Marsh v. Crate. Kiernan v. Newman. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. MIDDLESEX CAUSES FOR THE SITTINGS AFTER TRINITY TERM. Revenue. Causes —Customs: The Attorney-General v. Duncan John Stewart, S. J. The same v. John Robson, S. J. The same v. George Warren, S. J. The same v. G. S. Palley, S. J. The same v. Benjamin Brookman, S. J. Inland Revenue Cause.. The Attorney- Geneial v. John Fryer Kilby and Charles Henry Kilby, personal information, S. J. The same v. Thomas Smithson. Yorl-, ditto, S, J. The same v. Charles Thomas Smithson, ditto, S. J. The same T. James Boyue, ditto, 5. J. NEW SAFETY YACHT . - --- -- - - - .. Yesterday afternoon there was exhibited on the Serpentine, opposite the Royal Humane Society's receiving house, a yucht of very peculiar material and construction, the invention 'bf Mr.' W. Bonney, .likely to be simple and so re f gi C st l e a r r e e d ino th n e t design, ilia S w t. hi j c o hls 's, $° Fulham, who has dimensions of useful as to 'render it exceedingly pirated if not thus protected. Th . e breadth,. 4 feet 10 the vessel, as described by the inventor, are as follow :—Length, 13 feet 6 inches ; inches ; depth, 2 feet 4 inches. The hull . . is clinker built, planks of gotta percha dbut the principle of for mation will equally permit of the employment of other materials), cemented and copper riveted together. The sides are double from the bilge upwards to the spa deck, and divided into water-tigLt com partments, as are al so the fore and aft p ar t s o f th e boat, and likewise the o u t gunwale. The ke e l and keelson are of i ron, the latt er b e i ng grooved to rece ive the ribs, and th e whole i s bolted i together. The deck is double l a id, the upper diagonally, with marine g lue. The bilge timbers are deep er than usual, acting as extra keels, and they, with th e b uoyancy of the outer wale, and the iron keel and keelson as counterpoise, render it next to imposs ible to capsize h er. All the anti c i pat i ons forme d , no t only of her flo a ti ng, but of her sa ili ng capabil i t i es , were fully real. ised. She w as repeatedly fill e d with water; me n i n attendance g o t i nto her ; an d t h e re being a very stiff breeze blowing, her powers of resisting overturning were fully tested, and with complete success ; 'for not only was she not water-logged: but her rate of 1r g leasi " when fitted was scarcely i m p ed ed as com pared With what would have been the case with a boat of ordin ar y construct i on , though, indeed, a ny such boat under th e c i rcums tances would have n e yesterday' s exp e r i men t it inky be safely cessarily been w h o ll y umna nagabla and usel ess . From as sunned that b oats b u il t on M r . B on ney's plan cann o t b e sunk or capsi ze d b y acc i dent , an d scarcely intention ally; and, as the principle of the inventor does not interfere with ex t erna l form, it is applicable to craft of nearly all sizes. The most approved lines of launching can b e a d opte d , no t m erely in the cas e o f new boats, but those already built can be altered so as to participate fully (or nearly so, except as regards the complete substitution of gotta percha for wood) at ilLmancb. Owlett v. Mayor, Aldermen, and Citizens of Rochester, S. J.—Cockrane v. Lewis, S. J. Christie and others v. Massey, S. J. Prescott v. Mahon, S. J. Pennell and others, assignees, V. Anderson, S. J. Luerson v. Busk, S. J. Hart v. Baxend Ale, S. J.—Giles v. Pritchett, S. J. Lindsay and another v. Smith, S. J. Osborne v. Ridout, S. J. Hancock v. Be w ley, S. J.—Knight v. Fox and another, S.J. Neale v. Le Paigg, S. J. Sturge and another v. Clarke, Bart., S. J. Sims and others, v. Button and another, S. J. Glenie v. Baron de Delmar, S. J. Skinner v. London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway, S. J.—M`Gregor v. Hughes, S. J. King and another, executors, v. Bruin, S. J. Bar ker and another v. Branches, S. J. Dale* v. Ogle, S. J.—Dub, urg v. Lord Ingestre, S. J. Webster v. Planche, S. J —Barnley v. Verge, S. J. Midland Great Webt , rn R.ilway of Ireland v. Blythe, S. J. Same v. H. Moore. S. J.—Same v. C. Moore, S. J. Staunton v.W. E.Voules, S. J.—Same v. H.J.Voules, S.J. Doe dem. Merry weather bud wife v. Turner and others, S. J. Bousfield v. Breton, S. J.—Ardoin v. Mavrogordato, S. J. Craufend v. Cocks end others, S. J. Widirsms v. L we, S. J. Brown v. Wrgram and a nother, S. J. Dawson v. Gwynn, S. J. Oliver v. Learmouth. S. J.—Solornan v. Howell, S. J. Watts v. Penny, S. J.—Penny v. Watts, S. J. Smith v. London and NortL-Western Railway Com pany, S. J. Homer,ham v. Wolverhampton Waterworks COM patty, S. J. Pound v. Kelly, S. J.—Myers v. Austen, S. J. Pope and others v. Fleming, S. J.—Filiner, Bart., v. Mount, S. J. Semple v. Hewitt. S J.—Moore v. Hawes and another, S.J. Doe dem, Guilt v. Tayler,__gartisv.Tillemk. 'Whitcombe v. Webb, S.•.j. Same v. Earl of Strathmore, S, J. Taylor v. Ilughes.—Priest v. Remnant, S. J. • Bolton' and another v. Sinnett, the younger. Richardson v. Pe pper. — Adoington v. Fenton. Kings v. Reid.—Peel v. Peel.--Lacy and others v. Brown. Great Northern Railway v. Southall. Bertram v. Hutchins.—Wagner v. Armistead. Laidlaw v. Leach, S. j.--Dee v. Palmer. Sowerby, the younger, v.jackson.—Bradfield v. Duncan. Joseph v. Everettand another.—Claridge v. She well, S. J. Trail v. Holt. —Woods t Finnii. and another. M 01340 and another v. Jones and another. Dimes v. Lord Cottenham, S. J.—Methley v. Killick. Sea, Fire, and Life AssuranCe Society v. Williams, S. J. Gay Y. Shackle and another, S. J. Dick v. Jonides and another, S. J. Mackeson v. Phillips, S. J.—Hunter and another v. Moss. Langridge (executor) v. Johnson. a very reasonable expense. It would be difficult to exaggerate the importance of the extension of this discovery to life, and fishing, and race-boats; and we look for a speedy and extensive recognition of Mr. Bonney's merits in this matter at the hands of the Royal Yacht Club, and, indeed, nearly every regatta club in Great Britain. The attendance yesterday was not as numerous as could be desired, but this was owing to the state of the weather, which suddenly assumed an almost wintry aspect, threat ening rain all the evening, though, fortunately, there was none to diminish the satisfaction of the aquatic amateurs and professionals who did assemble according to Mr. Bonney's invitation, and by whom that inge nious gentleman was warmly congratulated, as he de served to be, on the great practical value of his con tribution to science and safety in one important branch of things nautical. A parcel of gutta percha sheet was shipped on board the Briton, Dundee trader, by Mr. John Taylor, of ihis town, on March Ist, which vessel was lost at Holy Island, during the gale of the 4th of that month. The revenue officers found the gutta percha at Wren Water, near Barn bro' Cas.le. Al: hough it had been exposed to the action of the sea for nearly three months, the water had not penetrated beyond the outer surface of the material, the gutta percha being equally as good es when shipped.—Newcastle Courant. CUIVES, JUNE 12.—Wivd t.;:W.—Atrtt. 6wea, 1341 n,“ Wiasstwiswetts, Nlatarzw; Edwin Augus'o, 'layouts', and Fu• Riga; Nueva Liavuunah. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF EXCILEWJER, June 12. IN RE AN ATTORNEY AND ANOTHER. It will he remembered that some time since Mr. Watson, Q.C., obtained a rule nisi, calling, on an at torney to .how cause why he should not be struck off the rolls, for allowing an unqualified person to prac tise in his name; and why such person should not be committed to tin: Queen's prison. Mr. M. CHAMBERS, Q.C., and Mr. WILLS showed cause, and relied principally on the fact that the person alleged to have been unqualified was the managing clerk of the attorney, and that he did not receive any portion of the profits. The affidavit in support of the rule stated that the deponent was informed, and verily tplieved, that this unqualified person was the articled clerk of the attorney, but was in fact serving with his own father, a solicitor, and was carrying on the busi ness of a bill discounter. The LORD CHIEF BARON—Though it is dangerous to lay down a general rule, I think it may be said that whenever a deponent swears that " he is informed and verily believes" facts in a case like this, he should state the name of his informant, and his precise state ments. New Causes. Davis v. Newton, S. J.—T. Colledge v. Harty. Goggs and another v. Gibbs Ty rwhitt and another v. Halsted. Hail v. Squire—Mitchell Y. Gunnell. Sherlund v. Marshall. Gell and another, executors, v. Deighton. Humphrys v. Freshfield. Gregory and (hers v. Miller and others, S. J. Caussidiere v. Long and another, S. J. Swaby v. Industrial and General Life Assurance and Deposit Company. Day and another v. Commerell and another. Buessard v. Brothetton and others., Keogh v. Keogh —Allen v. Ogden. Willson v. Hale, S. J.—Wilson v. Ashley, S. J. Oakley v. London and North-Western Railway Com pany, S. J.—Cook v. Hulls and another. Stevens and another v. Houston—Sherley, administor, v. Sinith—Hulme v. Hattersley, S. J. Sadler v. Boyle—Florence and another v. Crosse. Doe dem. Tdson and another v. Langley. Thorpe, P. 0., v. Boyes, S. J. Squire v. Prew—Tacker v. Shaw. Todd, adwinistra.tor, v. Webb Poe dew. Mea❑ and others v. Dando. Biddlcs v. Ledger—Vizitelly v. Chapman. Midi and another v. Dobell—Ambergate. Nottingham, Boston, and East Junctionlw ay v. Kitchin. Pat frement v. Bending—Lycett v. Crockett. Phillips v. Pound—Wells v. Drummond. Lenny v. Miffet, S. J.—Lloyd v. Howell. Rowley v. Wright— Wilkinson v. Boycott. Booth v. Lamle and another—Short v. Pousford. Short v. Woolett—Carlisle and others v. Vouillon. Lawder v. Berton—Newbon v. Benfield. Goldsmith v. Bell—Calisher v. Annesley. Tharratt v. Trevor—Cooper v. Harris and another. Cocker v. Scott—Almond and another v. Shepherd. Browning and others v. Holmes—Jeakes v. White. Rice v. Gibson—Wood v. Dickeson. interns v. Aldred. sued, &c. Mr. WILLS—The affidavit went on to s ty, "that from circumstances within his own knowledge he was informed and verily believed." This was clearly in sufficient : he should state the circumstances them selves from which he got his information. In other ways also the affidavits were insufficient. LORD CHIEF BARON—Striking out all that is given upon information and belief, what is there left ? Mr. WILLs —Nothing material. All that is left our affidavits answer. Mr. WATsoN replied in support of the rule. He contended that there was amply sufficient disclosed to warrant the Court in making this rule absolute. There was a bill handed to a Mr. Brown by his supposed managing clerk, which, however, was not indorsed by him, so great, apparently, was the estimation this Brown held him in. Then there was a letter de manding payment in the supposed clerk's hand writing, but written in the attorney's name. Then there was a request by the defendant's attorney to the plaintiff's attorney, requiring phiintiff's address, but no answer was returned. .No other person was ever seen in the office but the assumed clerk ; all the letters were in his writing ; and there was not one single al legation in the affidavits that the attorney himself ever saw a client or gained a shilling within those chambers he assumed to be his. He says he was much in county courts and in the Insolvent Debtors Court; but it must be borne in mind that he has to account fora period since 1843, and that the county courts have only existed since 1846. as ought to have stated that this person was his managing clerk, saw bis clients, made out bills of costs, received the money, and handed it over to him ; but this he has not done. The Learned Counsel animadverted on the opposite affidavits, and asked the Court to protect the public. Baron PLATT—We must also protect the pro fession. After a short deliberation the Learned Judges de cided on discharging the rule with costs. HOLLOWAY RAGGED SCHOOLS. The second anniversary of this laudable society was celebrated by a dinner at the London Tavern on Tuesday, Mr. Sheriff Nicoll presiding, supported by about 60 friends of the charity. Tile usual loyal and patriotic toasts having been drunk, The CIIAIRMAN proposed the toast of the evening, and in doing so stated that he believed that ragged schools were amongst the most important institution, of the day, as tending to develop the germs of goodness which lurked in the hearts of even the most depraved. There could be no doubt that the vast amount of good which they were calCulated to effect was daily in creasing, not so much from the increase in the number of the schools as from their improved discip line, order, and efficiency. He might be allowed to refer to an observation which he had beard from M. Guizot shortly after he came to this country in consequence of the revolution of France to show the position in which the charities of this country stood. That eminent indivinual stated that abroad every cha rity was supported by the Government, but that in this country they bad the genius of Britain stamped upon tbem, always bearing the inscription in large letters, " supported by voluntary contributions."— (Cheers.) That was the case with the institution whose pros perity they were specially met to promote; and he trusted they would not let the feebleness of his ad vocacy affect the liberality with which they were pre pared to support the Holloway Ragged Schools— (Cheers) —but that they would do all in their power to support them.—(Cheers.) The value of those schools might be shown from the fact that the average at • tendance at them consisted of 80 boys and 50 girls, and at the present time there were upwards of ro children attending them. He begged to give them, " Prosperity to the Holloway Ragged Schools," trusting that, root and branch, they might live ,for ever."— (Cheers.) • The toast having been duly honoured, the toasts of " The Lord Mayor and Corporation of London" and " The health of the Chairman" were drank, after which Mr. Aldrich, honorary secretary to the schools, and secretary to the Royal General Annuity Society, proceeded to read a list of donations in aid of the institution, in doing which he stated that the present school rooms were inadequate for the pur pose, and it was shortly proposed to lay the founda tion stone of a new building (the plan of which was exhibited in the room) in the Hornsey-road. He also stated that the Primate of All England bad honoured their society by preaching a sermon in its aid, which produced upwards of 501., being the first be had ever preached for a ragged school. The subscriptions of the evening amounted to 2001. (including 101. from the chairman, and about 251. from Mr. Phillips, of Holloway, and his family. Mr. BREWiTER proposed the health of Mr. Aldrich, and stated that about two years since the school was about to have perished for want of support, when that gentleman undertook the office of honorary secretary, and at once raised it to the position it now held, viz., that it had not space to meet its requirements. Mr. ALDRICH briefly acknowledged the compli ment ; and some other toasts having been drunk, the company separated at an early hour. RI 'PARTE THE DUKE OF BRUNSWICK IN RE CLEMENTS AND ♦NOTHER. Mr. Udall and Mr. Gray were heard in support of the application, and Mr. Knowles opposed it. It was a motion to issue a scire facias on the recog nizances entered into by the sureties of Ghislin, the printer of the Satirist newspaper. The affidavit of the Duke's attorney stated that judgment bad been re covered against Ghislin for libel, and damages had been recovered for 1,5001. and costs taxed at 2601. The Duke was therefore 2601. out of pocket. Soon after the verdict Ghislin left the country, and the Duke was therefore unable to recover either damages or costs out of pocket. His only course was to proceed against the sureties of Ghisliu on their recognizances. By the 60 Geo. 111. bonds and recogniz rotes were required to be entered into by all newspaper proprietors, in case fines should be imposed upon them in cases of conviction ; hut this statute applies only to indict ments and informations, and not to actions. The subsequent statute, 1 Wm. IV., requires recogni zinces to be entered into by the sureties (the amount of the recognizance to be 4001.) if an action far da mages be recovered, and the same remain unpaid. All persons libelled in a newspaper have therefore a remedy for the amount of their verdict, to the extent of 400/., not only against the publishers but also against the sureties. The statute of Wm. IV. gives a summary remedy on these recognizances where the action has been succes-fully brought against " editors, conductors, or proprietors." In support of the motion, it was contended that as no action had been brought against the editor, conductor, or proprietor, but only against the printer, the summary remedy could not be had re course to, and the scire facies only could effect the desired object. The COURT took time to consider their judgment. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, June 12. (Before Mr. Commissioner FONBLANQUE.) IN RE SIIEWARD. The bankrupt was a pawnbroker at Norwich. This was the certificate meeting. Mr. Lavrrance supported ; Mr. Lucas opposed. The grief ground of opposition was that the bank rupt had put Mrs. Fulcher, an elderly lady, to great expense by representing that she had made him a gift of a sum of 1,8501., instead of lent him the money. His HONOUR, in giving judgment, said that it ap peared from the evidence that Mrs. Fulcher could neither read nor write. A pass-book of her account between herself and the bankrupt had been impro perly headed by the bankrupt, and afterwards it was alleged to have been lost by his wife in the course of a walk of five miles through the snow to the old lady's residence. Mrs. Sheward was said to have fallen down twice on the way, and she supposed that she must have thus lost the book. It did not appear, however, that she had taken the slightest trouble to recover it. Now, it had been remarked that it was a singular circumstance that she should have lost the book when her pockets were so deep that they had contained not only the bad( but also an ox's tail—(A laugh)—and he (the Commissioner) thought it was. The bank rupt's own evidence was inconsistent With his repre sentation that the money was a gift. Looking at all the circumstances of the case, he could arrive at no other conclusion than that from the first the bankrupt had made up his mind that if Mrs. Fulcher did not leave him the money, her executors should not be in possession of evidence that would enable them to recover it. That was a serious offence, and so deeply imbued with fraud as to call fbr the longest suspen sion of the certificate that he ever adjudged. The certificate would be suspended three years, and pro tection withheld unless the bankrupt should have been in prison six months. IN RR CROFTS. The bankrupt was the landlord of the Marquis of Waterford Arms, Haymarket. The certificate was unopposed, and the Court granted one of the first class. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, June 12. (Before Mr. Commissioner Law.) 111 RE JAMES FREDERICK MUINCKS. This insolvent again came before the Court. It will be recollected that the insolvent, a German jour neyman tailor, had seduced a young Welshwoman, named Sarah Jameß, a servant, and had contrived to obtain from her 601. in money, on promise of mar riage. The case stood over for the insolvent to pro duce the young woman's watch, and for other pur poses. Mr. STURGEON again opposed for Sarah James, a►nd produced a copy of her savings bank book to show that she had made advances from her earnings as a servant to the insolvent. Her' watch was produced by the insolvent, but not a gold seal which she had given him, he now stated he had, with other articles, pledg€d, and disposed of the duplicate. • • Mr. Commissioner LAW directed the watch to be handed to the young woman, which was accordingly done ; and his Honour expressed himself of opinion that the insolvent had cruelly used her; he had got her money on the pretence that he was going to marry her. It was for him to see what amends he I could make, and 'with that view the case had better stand over for six weeks. The insolvent handed in a paper, which he wish' d to be read. It had heen written by a fellow. prisoner. The paper, which was read, expressed his regret for the injury he had inflicted on Sarah Jain ,, s, wh om he admitted he had promised to marry. She had been ill, and having become acquainted with his pre sent wife, and she being pregnant by him, he bad married her. THURSDAY EVENING, JUNE 13, 1850. Mr. Commissiouor LAW obierved that the insolvent, on his former hearing, dental the promise to marry. which he now admitted by the statement he had made to Sarah James. The case would stand adjourned to settle; and if the young woman withdrew her oppo• sition he might be discharged, otherwise he would re ceive a judgment. The case was adjourned to the 24►.h July. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. James Balls appeared in discharge of his bail before Sir Chapman Marshall to answer a charge of careless driving, and thereby causing the death of Robert William Harris, a child about three years of age. Police-constable 348 stated, that about half-past eight o'clock on Tuesday evening he was on duty on Ludgate-hill, when he heard the scream of a child, and on looking round saw the conductor of one of the Hackney omnibuses pulling a couple of children from under the feet of the horses. The defendant was driving the omnibus, which belonged to Mr. Bather of Hackney, up the hill, when the two chil dren ran directly und, r the horses' feet and were knocked down. On being picked up they were con veyed on a stretcher to Mr. Hutchinson s, a surgeon in the neighbourhood, but. before they arrived there deceased was found to he dead. Joseph Ehill, a gentleman residing in the Hack ney road, otpused that on the evening in question be was riding on the outside of defendant's omnibus, which was going up Ludgate-hill at a slow pace, about five miles an hour, when a little boy, about eleven or twelve years of age, carrying deceased, attempted to cross the road immediately under the beads of the horses. They were both knocked down and trampled on by the horses, but he believed they were not touched by the wheels of the vehicle. Huntley Harris said, he resided in Fleur-de•lis court, and was first-cousin to the deceased, whom he was carrying in his arms across Ludgate-hill when knocked down by the omnibus horses. The omnibus was standing still a few minutes previous at the bot tom of the hill, and when he endeavoured to cross the omnibus came on him unawares, knocked him down, and his cousin (deceased) out of his arms ; he felt the foot of one of the horses placed on his back, and the fore wheel passed over his cousin's neck. He (witness) got up as soon as , he could and took de ceased in his arms, when a gentleman came and took him away to the doctor's. He recollected nothing more as he was very much frightened at the time. Did not see deceased after he was taken from him. Several of deceased's relatives appeared to give evidence, but nothing was elicited to support the charge of careless driving on the part of the de fendant. Sir CHAPMAN MARSHALL said, he believed that the defendant was perfectly blameless, from the evidence which had been adduced, the more particularly so from his own personal knowledge of the great care and attention displayed by the drivers of the Hack ney omnibuses in general. He would therefore dis charge the defendant, but recommended him to be punctual in his attendance at the inquest, in order that the end and aim of justice might be perfectly satisfied. WORSHIP-STREET. William Wickley, a tall, powerful man, described as a greengrocer in Turville-street, Bethnal-green, was placed at the bar before Mr. Arnold, charged with causing the death of his sister-in-law, a young married woman named Margaret Wilmot. James Turpin, a hawker, said—l was standing with a friend in front of the bar of the Victory public-bouse, in Little Nelson-street, Bethnal-green, at eight o'clock last evening, when the prisoner came in in the company of a woman, and 'both of them appeared to be intoxicated. The deceased, Margaret Wilmot, followed them in, and, addressing the other woman, asked her it she knew that the prisoner was a married man. She had scarcely uttered the words when the prisoner, with a threatening obser vation, raised his arm, and was in the act of striking het, when I ran out to seek her husband, whom I met in au adjoining street, and having been informed on my way back that the woman had been carried home senseless, we proceeded there together, and on reaching the hoitse lotted her lying there dead. A policeman was•standing outside, to whom I commu nicated what 1 • had witnessed, and 1 accompanied him to a house in a street leading out of Club-row, where I pointed out the prisoner, who was taken into custody. Susan Shepherd, a married woman, residing two doors from the public-house in question, stated—l was very intimate with the deceased, whose sister was the wife of the prisoner, and while conversing with her at my own door, between seven and eight last even ing the prisoner passed us with a woman, who was so much intoxicated that she fell down in the road. •She was raised up by the prisoner, wbo took her into the public-house, follow e d by th e deceased, who had seen the two together, and directly afterwards I heard the noise of a violent contest inside the house, and on hastening there found the deceased, supported in the arms of two men, without either bonnet or shawl, convulsively struggling, and being carried into the street. I picked up the deceased's cap and shawl, which were lying on the floor in front of the bar, and went out to follow her, but, not seeing the deceased, I returned home and found her sitting on a step at the back door, retching violently, and apparently very ill. I raised her head to support her, and asked if I should get her a cup of tea, to which she seemed silently to assent, and I sent my little girl to prepare it, while I continued holding her, but almost imme diately afterwards her bead suddenly dropped, and she exclaimed, in a taint voice, " Oh, dear, Mrs. Shep heard, what shall I do !—my eyesight is gone ?" She then became senseless, and never spoke afterwards, and I, having procured assistance, caused her to be carried into her own house, where she was placed in bed, and a surgeon in the neighbourhood was in stantly sent for, but upon examining her he at once pronounced her to be dead. This morning I assisted in undressing her, but did not, while doing so, observe any marks of violence upon her person. Police-constable Kim berley, of the H division, stated, that upon taking the prisoner into custody and apprising him that he was charged with maltreating his sister in- law, who had since died of the injuries she had sustained, he made no reply, and was there up .n conveyed to the station. The prisoner, who appeared very much depressed, offered no observations in answer to the charge, and Mr. ARNOLD ordered hint to be remanded for the completion of the evidence, but consented, in the meantime, to accept substantial bail for his future ap pearance, which he fixed at the prisoner himself in 1001., and two sureties in 501. each, with twenty four hours' notice to inquire into their sufficiency. SOUTHWARK. An application was made to Mr. A'Beckett for a warrant against a woman known by the name of Louisa Beauchamp, for obtaining various sums of money from William Bond, of New Ceurch-street, Bermondsey, tinder the pretence of procuring for him a fortune of 50,0001., .which she alleged he was entitled to by the decease of a relative at Ipswich. The applicant described that the person against. whom he made the application called at the house of his sister some time since in apparent distress, as serting that she bad been wrecked on her passage home from India, and that although she was related to some families of distinction, and amongst then to the Duke of Buccleuch, she yet felt a strong repug nance to making her situation known to them. She then expressed a wish to take apartments in the house, and promised that upon the receipt of a consi derable sum of money which she was entitled to, and in daily expectation of receiving, she would liquidate whatever debt she might contract there. Upon these representations she became an inmate of the dwelling, and applicant, believing that he was entitled to some property at Ipswich, ,mentioned the. subject to the new, lodger, who at once undertook the management of the business, saying that it would be necessary before they proceeded any further in the matter to obtain certain registers and other doouments showing that he was entitled to the property i n ques ti on, adding, that if he advanced her the necessary means to go, to Ipswich she would . proceed thither forthwith, and she assured him 'that from her connexion with the aristocracy` she had a licence to examine all documentary papers having re ference to such matters, and that she had the entrée of the different publicsoffices for that purpose. Ap plicata; having reliance in the truth of the statement, accordingly advanced her 21. on that occasion, and she started for •Ipswich,, from which , place and Norwich and Yarmouth he received a number of letters, which he handed to the magistrate. The letters were from Louisa Beauchamp, some of which were read, and all written by a person evidently well experienced in epistolary correspondence on the subject to which they referred. The writer mentioned that she was most successful in her inquiries, and , had got a clue to property to which applicant was entitled, and re quested a remittance to enable her to prosecute the business to a successful issue. In another epistle from :Norwich the writer described that in the course of her examination for the necessary documents to esta blish his right and title to property left him at Yar mouth; she had discovered that he was also entitled to a fortune of 50,0001., and she concluded by calling' upon him for more money to pay the expenses she in cursed in obtaining the necessary information to put, him in possession of that large amount. The appli cant had at various times advanced money to her to the amount of 20/., and, finding that all she had written on the subject of the propsrty alluded to in her letters was false, bad since made some inquiries about her, arid ascertained that she bad obtained money by similar means from other parties, and he add'ed that his motive in coming forward on the pre sent occasion was to put the public on their guard against a person of such a character. Mr. A'SEC KETT ex p re ssed his surprise that the ap. plicart should h ave a ll o wed himself to be imposed upon by a person who came to his sister's house in described that she had 'apparent distr ess , a n d who been shipwrecked, _ The applicant s a id th a t s h e r e ally was a woman °F such insinuating address that she completely threw him of his guard, and that he transmitted the money upon the faith of her representing that she could pro cure the necessary documents for him at Ipswich to prosecute his claim to property there to which be was entitled. Mr. ATECKETT complied with the applicati"' and granted a warr an t f or th e apprehension of the person complained against. LAMBETH. Mr. William Edward Eicke and Mr. Henry SeP ti. mus Eicke, who stand charged, the former w ith the commission of a forgery and extensive fraud on t he South-Western Railway Company, and - the hitte r with being an accessory to the fraud after the fac t, were again pieced at the bar before Mr. Elliott, for further examination. Mr. L. Crombie, from the office of Messrs. Na t : chain and Dalrymple, solicitors to the company , d tended for the prosecution, and Mr. Games apPear e on behia of the prisoners. Mr. Crombie, add ress i ng the magistrate, 151 a b° t Was not prepared w ith an y f u rth e r ev idence at preset) I to strengthen the chse against the prisoners Henry S.- whims Eicke , but should apply for a further re:. !nand as respected him, and should his Wor shi P disposed to grant his request, he had no objection, t_ ° , his tieing released upon a lower amount than to which he had been called upon on a previous ditY find. Mr. ELLIOT observed that 'he had looked diref °l l l through the evidence, and his decided impression 1 /.7.: that there was nothing in it to support the indictment against the prisoner Henry SePti 2l3ll Eicke. Some discussion followed between the inegt ite : Mr. Crombie, and Mr. Games, which ended in !bell* , , charge of Henry Septimus Eicke ; the compile, l ef ing still the power to indict him at the Old BSI I for conspiracy to defraud. Further evidence against the other prisoner then gone into, after which efillt Mr. Crombie said he h a d o th er w it ne sses to b i e whose testimony would occu py some considel l n id time, and at that late h ou r o f th e even i n g be nes-- not call them, bat wou ld reques t a r ema nd to a 01 " day, when they would be in attendance. Mr. Games said he had no objection t 9 a rens° de as it was quite imp oss ibl e f or hi m to prepare fence for his client, if h e was sen t f or t r i a l to. the P r o sent session, and, theref o r e , if comm itt e d, be shoo have to get consent t o h ave th e case postp postpone d '-„ a under the circumstances he was d es i rous for a rely beyond the session. Mr. Crombie said that on th e part of the comp any it was by no means his wish t o pr ess an ything ila" ,as ; against the prisoner, and the further examination T., 9 , adjourned for a week, Mr. Elli o tt p erem ptorily' re''' ing FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE OF TUESDAY. DIVIDENDS. At the Court, Basinghall-street. , st E. Dixon, Gravesend, oil a n d co l ourman , .juif vi clevfn—W. Brown, Suff o lk-l ane , Cannon-street , stone merchant, July 2, at one—W. Harper, OOP° court, Cornhill, merchant, July 2, at twelve. In the Country. sa J. Harrington, Manchester, commission agen t of (auntun, Nittingharnshire, farmer, July 4, at cav e "' the Court, Manchester. PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS. , bas S. Firth, Leeds, linen draper, 55., any TuesaaY'd o , tween Pleven and two, at the office of Mr. liope, Le e , 4 6,. T. Walley and P. W. Hardwick, Oxford-stree t, " 6 , 0 pers, 205., on Thursday, the 13th inst., and the 0 4 0 following Thursdays. between eleven' and two, at office of Mr. Stansfdd, Bisinghall-street. etlsci ( ' T. Keasley and J. L. Keasley, Church-street, on friar-road, and Walsall, Staffordshir e , t an ners iti A g y ' o , Thursday, June 13, and the three f o ll ow i ng Thll rg . u r i e ld, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Sta rts Basinghall-street. °ll C. Sneezum, Woodbridge, Suffolk, grocer, 3i. • Lyth Thursday, June 13, and the th ree f o ll ow i ng Thors-f-eld, between el-ve., and two, a t the office of Mr. Sts l3 '" - Bazinghall-street. 4 1 ,0 W. Woods and S. Thomas, Cheapside, wh°'. - 1 , 0 0 hard. aremen, 55., on Thursday, Jun e 13, a nd the 70. following Th urs d a y s , b e t ween e l even an d t wos office of Mr. Stansfeld. 13asing n3o:hall-street. d elf J. Dailey and A. In s kipp, Long-lane, Berls, leather manufacturers, 1 15-16 d., on Thursday, J un- s t)ci and the three following Thursdays, between del l/li t two, at the office of Mr. Stansfeld, Basinghall-stre et ' J. Webster, Southgate, dealer in mining shares , 'j os , on Monday, May 10, and two subsequent MoutlnY ß ' n o, tween eleven and three, at the office of Mr. C an Birchin-lane. d 0 W. B. Bieber, Little Britain, pl um b er , Is. 111 Monday, 10 - h inst., and two subsequent Mondiil' tween eleven and three, at the office of Mr. Birehin-lane. H. Biers, Carlton-villas, Edgware-road, 7d',. 0. L 0 0t4 day, 10th inst., and two subsequent Mondays, ,„ 1 "," bir eleven sad thr ee , as th e o ffi ce o f M r. Canaan, P'"- lane. 0 04 C. Williams, Charlton-street, Som ers T own , 3s' AO any Wednesday, betw een e l even an d three, at the - O of Mr. Whitmore, Basinghall-street. NOTICES OF CERTIFICATES. In the Country. „,,oft, J. Hollingworth, Ki ngston - u pon-Hull, ship ° "b - ar July 3, at half-past twelve, at th e T own -h a ll, 1(illgLo. upon-Hull—T. Ross, jun., Burton Joyce; Nntl iffi kur4 shire, braid manufacturer, July 12, at ten , a t the hirrt Nottingham—D. H. Beresf ur d, Stockport, C"%fiter. linendraper, July 4, at eleven, at the Court, Mane" - CERTIFCA•UES GRANTED. s tet J. 0. Surtees, Wigm o r e - s t reet , C ave ndishl4loD print seller, certificate of the third class--E ug rr i vae Aydou and T. W. Ferguso n , Newcastle-ar;10.4 r grocers and tea de a l e r s , cer tifi cate o f t h e . third " e ct' after 21 days from June 6—J. Hill, Fr °B ,,P o od place, Holloway, build er , . cer tifi cate o f the 66 o r class—G. Davison, Alnwick, Northumberlso,, d t. renter, certificate of the second class—H. P h e , i 7) o l ;' Southtown, Suffolk, bricklayer, stonemason;lit o ,"7:.--J', and coal merchant, certificate of the th ird , c-ta s ;„ Young, Manby, Lincolnshire ; innkeeper, c ertifleti'" the third closs, after two years from Jure At' PARTNERSHIPS 'DISSOLVED.. J. Taylor and M. W. Taylor, Penrith, C0n 3 : 4 7.,.fge physician—J. Barlow and C.• Barlow, Liverp oo :sol 4 brokers-I'. Auster and N. IL Smith,• Birn", ° ,°' h orit merchants--E. Prickett and B. T. Noakes Ar e y - o peot attorneys —W. Marbhall, jun , and -s"dr Nottingham, plumbers—W. Meat:to, Ben. , and -I , wick, Bishopwe a r tnou th, 'D ur h am , iru it e reicci e rs Topott and J. D. W a lk er ,- N ott i ng ham, ° I L' eV —C. Gabel' and A. R. Gabon, Crickhovell , Zbiep nockshire, solicitor s J. A n d erson an d B• 1 1" South Shields, chain and anchor manufactur er '''....* deo, Speakman and C. Speakman, Salford; cotton 5 1 ) 1%.....v . H. James and Hannah James, Nottingham, /,10 06 1,7„00, Wickham and W. Wickham, Hawkhurst. Kea , .11," - so ° and grocers—R. Tinsley and J. Holt, Salford,2l, most worsted dyers—W. Neineger and D. Hume; pa . clockmakers. INSOLVENT PETITIONERS: Richard Brown, Aspatria, Cumberland boot 0 13 ' 1 maker. Thomas. Wills, Egloshayle, Cornwall, farmer, r. George Stiuthee, Brambling, Ickham, Kent, gr . ° 63 , William Ruglys, Canterbury, assistant to a tair °3 b ilter' John Littler, New Ferry, Bebbington, Clieshirep Samuel Pitt, Little Dean, Gloucestershire, shoP ili , L P ° William Frank, otherwise Franks, Long Stit t° P l culnshire, farmer and labourer. :S. 4 0 ,,' SUMMER CIRCUITS OP THE JUDGES. -7 —?. he . The Learned Judges . who are to go u on'this iirCutt; the -fe'; Chief Baron and Mr. . Justice. Erie, appointed . 1 1e -T iel, lll lowing days for opening the commission in' the roes: counties :-Herts, Wednesday. July 10, at Hertfor d ' l aw Monday, July, 15, at Chlemsford ; Sussex, MoilditYt'sarfo' at Lewes; Kent, Monday, July 29, at Maidet. ol4; ' • „ g t Monday, August 5, at Guildford. • • • tat ro to o CADVERTISEMENT3—A Ltvei Complaint ° f 1113,-ed hopeless nature cured. by Holloway's Pills.- -3 ' 1. 1,410', g , Clark. of Lake George, New South Wales, was strie us ',J e acle e- a for years with a. liver complaint. His medical ¢t i on t!it, after trying all their skill, candidly 'their- 01 0 ' -.ell gave Or • n his case was h opeless . In thiS situation, and when • Ol e # • at that every l terminate his earthly Caree r ' bffati t , recommended him to try Holloway's Pills, aiSurinik.,,,late, he knew a person who Was cured by them of * lt Cu 7-.. 44 1 He adopted the advice and found a spe relief fru t ;..bei l j a ., them, and in a, short time based as pe restoe. _Saw way,vEstablishi"entd, Londc Sold by all 'vendors of icines au dit pro • • BIRTHS. A the ,g OF A SON. e On the Bth inst., at Chettle.lodge; Crtinhoru" • wife o: Captain Douglas Curry, R, N. ' , e On the tOth inst., at Hate rv ill e . near Esher, t- 11 J. Oliver William Lambert. x . D[rs~ the 10th inst., at the Av e nue, Streatu ' hop , Kinnersley Hooper. goro- On the Bth inst., at Tortworth, the Hon. l Of t OF A DAUGHTER.' wi.o On the 10th inst., at D ev o ran , C orn wall, ,th a Rev. F. C. Jackson. ch On the 10th inst., in St. Giles'-street Oxford, PLO' :or _ ,f e James Spier,, On the 9th inst., at Shipley Parsonage, Stis s v:x' the Rev. Francis' Bourdillion MARRIAD. lahab o On the 6th inst.,. at. St.- Luke's, , Chelsea' .., ha ,b a n e y: ° l I.douard, second son of the late ,Captain of tP - Alayence-on•the-Rhine; to Caroline, •eld'ost daub th er ,:;: late Mr. 'l'. Griffin, of LeadenAill-street.-Lo0 00 •'• „ At All Slants, teirangton on the Bth inst., StePhe - fe hct 0 ' son of the late Admiral n'obert Murray to An"' the late W. J.. Young;-Esq., of Bombay, s .fO~II` OLIO. On the 4th inst.; at Moneo-house, 'Perthshire+ L. Cl4E:obeli, Esq , ef Glenfallock, aged 63: On the sth . . inst., Lieutenant-Colonel Thornal, Gerald. of Turlough- park, county of Maye,'lreltitla.l,. On the 7th inst., at Fontainebleau, Frederick At „, 0 ot nolds, Esn., author of liiserranws," &c,,,„ and gide ° the late F. Reyn6l,ll, the celebrated Oratnatist. - 00 114! On, the 7th inst., in Edinburg 2fsfv "" Edinburgh Mary, widow' 0 tr -I+oo General Sir James Hay, K.C.H., Colonel of the Guards,. . " r 1150 t Bart., of Mickleh atn , On the 10th inst:, in G r d svenor - s i lu ari;str T A Surrey. &ed 70, On the lth inst. at orth-bank, Regent's park, ab 7„; Elizabeth, wife of Lieutenant-Colonel James Conway'' . .tsccf, At the Hoyal-circus, Edinburgh, on the 6th inst ' ' Eliott., relict of the late Sir W. Eliott; of Stobs , At Greenwich, on the 9th inst., Ann, the wife al Clarke, of Finth-lane, • London: Printed and Published by MURDO No, 112, &rand, Prinwr, at 21 4 1e.thos • Offic* . '' o7 ls titrand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, iD OTh w kiddie's& Thursday, June 13, 1850. if e 2 c p oi t Ter Como hours Who n ertion • tinuan At a Compa of Lort the 13 " Th Way C eat , nd Easter compul of Wor create their 11 clauaes affect t "?ha Esq., to the Boa behalf." Bisho: G nth(); The re Diiect 01nrilbti ♦ery qua nom Ili the 'toil, Time. • n.. M. .10 I it_ 14 - 11/ w,.; *5 :74 • Passages fitted to si _IIOAT T • • rhreo Mon packets: of • . Jane 9, 1 • AN M El ' • The publi - Wished b,} t : 'tillare be ea .WILLIAM tiza inanage 0 The Shoal Contain, as • Plate, in tki ' as ofl t Electro • PLAN 11 ;' , t^/ ' Coral)! Plstinguishe • • - and Compass, Ifahoga 321'..ATALAI t en din pure Yahong vt , or dinarily -10 > gtheiw •: ° fftreklar 'their .exiitrh '' '4en dtbettid ''')44fo —.,: tka `,"" Their ineri inst,rita -.ore p aa ti e ;f !heir nsi elkedi Go lbrery,- bel • 4c. Pshop ,;;;4.41. tter t t t at el IfDelp-anti ,me -"torit, PI th &se 12 4 ;4 barue for t l it h.ogh our tnbe dr jo 44'"°'ie,i in's to ht s jam .entlfTc &mtOur R.,... — KgrY4!. tta 4i - 4114! 1 1.; 1 1Y, %Itƒ: ht.a.t t 6 ~. heh I,2 4 innot too ` ' ,7 4 l‘;'• _ ; ' 4e , 41 l~ku,troy Haantneaden pip . --- `-‘ 4 ltornha, "I am, tonseqtte en ply of Butt lA:bledtt) to sui •fcmc tolttitit Ab,,,LON) A 11,t vs To le Oti4.9_est-str un• Shil . 1116 1; 44 t4. Field 4 41 4111.1 tar 4 - / k X 430, 0 14 / ( `Ttin" l l , lllar r th,;"" 7 .clebilus tittg rl4 K, bea 4611'1'6%14: Tn 1144 -7,17 1 a: ttiel."4 , lll , tc , roll4 F. "!;11,141' Narclii °VIP' ° lt b 0 t ° SiCO defect 717 p ' Lc. ‘112 4 * J c ‘!!tt ti ,;4 kir *ft Time 1 1 1 4% • _fig% 11% • • • or to Pei recoil atter also E 4 Wll their I recom flute WA! Douse E The (