The Sun. — London, England, 1814-03-04 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT . OF CHANCERY, NlA.K.cri 3. CALLINt V. OALLINT. •'.• • In this case, in which .a bill hail been filed, on the part of the-next of kin, in the names of two infants of the name of Gallini, against their fa ther, praying' for specific performance of an al leged aereernent, into which he had entered With the mother, previous to, and' as a condition of, the nuirriage, that. the father should - renounce the Roman Catholic- RergiOn, which he then pro fessed, and that the children should be educated in "the PrOtestant Sir SAMUEL Ro-N4t:l,,y moved against a person taking' on himselfthe style and title of Sir Ed- • ward Perrott, and an Attorney named, Chester, - for impeding or defeating the service Of:a - Writ of Habeas Corpus, which been directed by.his Lord ship, on the-application of the defeneapt, - the fa ther of the infant plaintiffs', to ;Nlary,Gallini, the mother, calling on her to bring into Court the bodies of the two infants. His Lordship had, on an application to that effect, ordered - that service of the notice on Mr. Chester, who had-been At torney for Mrs. Gallini in -a. motion of a si(uilar kind, in the Court of King's Bench, should - be esteemed good service ; the notice' was according- , lv served on Mr. Chester, but that Gentleman now stated that he was no longer - Mrs. Gal!ini's, Attorney; and on a-person calling stra house in Molineux-street, Edgiiare-road, - occupied by Sir Edward Perrott, the ,brother-in-law of Mrs. Gal-• lini, where it Was understood she was resident at . the time, the rerson so calling for the purpose of serving the notice was refused - access to •her by Sir E. Pcrrott, who informed the person that she could - not be seen,burthat she was already aware of the business, notice of the applitation having been served on her Attorney. - It ftra47.of import- , twee to the deftndatit 'in this case, that he should have the .infant plaintiffs put under proper care, the mother not- being a tit person to have the cus tody of them, and the defendant liaving lately. been under the - necessity of.hringing an action against a Gentleman fur 'criminal conversation with her. The -LORD•CITANCELLOIT asked, did that persotc whom Sir Samuel Romilly called .Sir Edward Per rott, admit that Mrs. Gallini was in the house at the time the person making the affidavit went to serve the notice upon her i fir SAMUEL ROMILLY admitted that did not dis tinctly appear. The Linn' CHANCELLOR said, whether this Sir Edward Perrott, Mr. Chester the Attorney, or any one else, on any pretext whatever, attempted to interpose to the effect of disappointing the ser vice of any process or order of that Court, -his Lordship- warned them that he should order the AktorneyzGeneral to proceed against all of them. His Lordship added, Sir Samuel Romilly had better take a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and if this Sir Edward Perrott should interpose himself to prevent the execution of his Lordship should bold his doing so to be a very high offence ; and he thought it right to say so before-hand, that he - might take what care he could to prevent this person from involving. himself in so high a crime. Sir SAmust, ROMILLY observed, that the same person was already indicted for assaulting- the person by whom the notice. was to have been' served.• The LORD CHANCELLOR said, this was .a far greater and very different offence. His Lordship took it for granted, that Mr. Chester was actu ally, and bona fide out of the cause, and had ceased to have any concern of any kind in it ; else he was not aware what he was' abolit.. His Lord ihip wished to know was he a Solicitor • before this Court.?. The children, it had been stated, were at a boarding-school at Brighton, but that the name of the mistress of the school was not known ;_that, his Lordship thought, might tie easily a,sccrtained, and his Lordship should have no difficulty of making an order on the mistress to bring the children into Court.--In the course of the day, Mr. WAKERELD appeared on the part of Mrs. Gallini, and admitted service of the notice on her, through Mr. Chester. her Attorney. The order, however, had been pronounced by his Lordship so long ago as the 21st February, and the notice had not been served on Mr. - Chester till the even ing of the Ist of March. It was impossible, there fore, that Mrs. Gallini could have been ready to instruct her Attorney the parties, besides, were at present all necessarily obliged to be in the country, as a trial of very, great importance to them would, in all likelihood, come on at the As sizes at Reading, on Monday, the result of which would, in all probability, have a,very considerable effect upon. the fate of the Writ of Habeas Corpus, and of the suit altogether. TheLono CHANCELLOR, in these circumstances, ordered that the mutter should stand over till this clay sennight. OPERA HOUSE.-TAYLOR V. WATERS. Mr. HART moved in this case ' that. a sum of Bank Annuities, standing in the'name of the Ac countak-General, to the credit ofthe cause, equal to the payment of half a year's rent and taxes of the Opera House, should be sold out, and paid, over into the hands of - Francis Coast, Esq. the surviving acting trustee.--Prdered. LORD KINNARD V. DOWAGR - RLADY SALTOUN. Sir Si.A ROMILLY, Mr. LEACH, and Mr. ABER CROMBY moved that the l!ljunCtion 'in this case, by which the defendant was restrained from pro ceeding at law to recover out of the hands of the auctioneer, Mr. Harry Phillips, the deposit money paid by the defendant, on the purchase" of the plaintiff, Lord Kinnard's house,. in Lower Gros venor-street, at the sum of 10,4001. shonld he dissolved. The sale took place in February, 1613 - , and the defendant 'was to have had possesSioll at the latest on the 25th day of March f o li o ving.-2- The plaintiff, however, - had been. unable to make a good title, having sold an unexpired term of 47 years, and it turned out, on inquiry, that all he had to sell was an unexpired term of 7 years, and a reversionary term of 37 years, w4;le it was pc), sitively - stipulated that Lord Grosvenor, of whom . the lease was held, was not bound to produce his title. This clearly came under the authority of the ease of Puljain and White, decided by his Lord ship: and, besides, there was a rent-charge of MR a year ont ‘ of all Lord Grosvenor's estates, which might equally well be demanded out of the house in question, as -out of any other part of that Noble Lout's property. • Mr. HART and Mr. DoVins-wzr.t. Contended, that the present case was distinguishable fret] that of Fuljam and White inasmuch as there were there two ierms, hut here the original term and the reversionary term being derived both from the same lessor; Richard, late Earl' of Gros:venor, they were in reality tantamount to one term. The LOAIP-CHANCELLOR asked, were all the term's in thiliro leases the same? Mr. HART—said, he understood they were ; at all events that the terms in the reversionary lease were not- more burdensome than those in the original lease. As- to the rent-charge ,of 10001. a year over the whole of the Earl of Gtosv'enor's estates, that hail been released. The Earl of Grosvenor, too, was now willing that the De fendant should see his title, in the hands of the Master. The Lorin CHANCELLOR thought he could not send the parties into the Master's Office in the .present circumstances. When a person purchased a.honse in London, he surely thought that he %vas acquiring some-place into which he might put his bead at a given period.. Was the. Coart to say to. a pyrchascr of a house in London;that he was bound to take it, if he Could not get into it for 20 'years hence. Such circumstances as the pre sent, bis Lordship thought, formed an objection to a.spacifie performance of the agreement. The defendant, in this case, contracted, on the 17th Febrnary,-with a condition that she should be admitted to possession on the 25th of March fol lowing. His Lordship had himself looked at the house in question, and he kninv., from the . pressiori it made on his mind, that it must be _a, very di ff erent thing to ' a purchaser, whaher he Acquired right to an old unexpired term, under . which there had been long undisturbed posses lion, or under an unexpired term cif shoit dura tion, and a reversionary term' Which might be .good" for nothing, there being hardly one tick in a hundred where the proprietor had a power to make . leases in reversion. His Lordship, how ever, should look into the bill and amended bill, and should then dispose of the present motion. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. • Six Special Jury Causes v;ire set down for trial yesterday, but the merits of none of them were gone into. Several were referred, and the rest were disposed of very shortly, without any trouble to Judge, Jury, or Counsel. Two or three com mon Jury Causes were decided, but they were either undefended, or no effectUal resistance was made. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. GLOVER V. BUCKLEY. This was an issue directed from the Court of Chancery,. to try whether a sum exceeding one hundred, pounds. was due .front the bankrupt, of whom the defendant is an assignee, to the plain tiff.. The question on which the case hinged, Was, • whether Heald, the bankrupt, was or - was not a _partner with another bankrupt of the name of Showell, previously to the bankruptcy Of Showell, which took place on the 22d of May, 1813. The purpose of the issue was to satisfy the Lord Chan cellor whether a joint commission issued against Showell and Heald was justifiable. Serjeant YELL, for the plaintiff, attempted to make out the partnership by a long chain of circumstantial evidence. Mason., .the• shopman of Showell, who was a slopseller in lloundsditch, said that he knew Mr. Heald, who was a warehouseman inCateaton street. In September•, 1812, and thence up to March, 1813, he used frequently to come to the shop of Heald, and interfered in the management of the business, by examining the books, and-asking respecting the money which witness was in the. habit of receiving on accdun.t of Mr. Showell.— At one time the counting-house was altered, and Heald gave the directions to the carpenter. On one Occasion, a package of goods being about to be sent to Lynn,. in Norfolk, to he sold at the- Mart there, Heald forbid them to be taken out of the shop,•aod said that no goods should be taken out of the shop without his knOwledge. On several occasions, within the time in question, goods we►e sent from Heald's warehouse to Showell's shop,' -with invoices : as they had been sent before Showell was indebted to Heald to a considerable amount. Showell was indebted to Glover, for goods delivered in 1813, to the amount of more than 1001. • Crooks, a foreman of Showell, 'corroborated 'this account, as the circumstances which came to his knowledge. ' Mr. Joseph, a friend of Mr. Showell and Mr. Heald, said that he bad frequently heard them both say that they were in partnership. This was about the end of 1812. Heald said t h at he was to advance 30001. to the concern. They purchased jointly some_additional premises in Honndsditch. They also bought home goods on their joint ac: count from a'lllr. Wolfe; .tWo invoices were made out for these goods, which were sent to Heald's warehouse._ In 1813 Showell andlleald borrowed some money from Mr. Wolfe, and gave a promissory note for the amount in their joint names. This Was on the 12th of March.—On his cross-exami nation, this witness said, that he was in the habit of writing for Mr. Wolfe, who was a creditor of Showell, but that he was not his Clerk; be lived on his own fortune. The Carpenter, whO made the alteration in the counting-house of 'Showell, said that Heald had titian him to Showeli's . shop, and directed Lim jointly with Showell. This alteration was made on the 25th of March, 1813. Lamburn said he was employed to take Sho well's stock on the 9th of March : it occupied him about a'week. Heald spoke to him while he was so employed, -and told hitu he tad an interest in the business. Witness understood him to wean, that -he was about to go into partnership with Showell. Mason, cross-examined as to dates, said, that the time when Heald examined Showell's books was subsequent to the' alteration in the shop. It Was inhuitted, on the part of the plaintiff, that there was to allusion to the partnennip in Showell's ,Ooks. Alr-Scrjeaut SHEPHERD, for the defendants, contended, that all the acts which were proved (leaving out of the question the evidence of Jo - - seph) were of an' eqnirocal nature, and if not referable to the situation of Heald as a creditor to a. large amount, were easily explained from the fact, which he did not pretend to deny, that -Heald was about to enter into. partnership with Showell, which he would have done hadite not discovered theetnbarrasSed State of 1113 ,As to Joseph's. evidence, it was in contradiction to the whole tenor of the other facts, and that witness must have mistaken (which 'might easily be the case) the conversations of Heald and . Showell, as applying to at actually existing, in stead of a proposed partnership. ,The only evidence of consequence, on the part of the defendant, was the production of a warrant of attorney from Showell to Heald, in which he confessed the sum of 30001. to be due to the lat ter. This was executed in December 1812. The CHIEF' JUSTICE summed up - tlie evidence, and observed on the facts stated by the shopman and foreman a Showell, that they seemed rather to indicate a partnership in contemplation than in existence. He remarked,.. that the circuni stance that no mention of-the partnership was made in the books wh le there seemed no motive for its concealment, if it bad existed, operated in favour of the defendant's case. Joseph's testi mony, however, if believed to be accurate all its extent, would establish clearly the case of the plaintiff. It was for the Jury to say, whether, under all the circumstances, it was probable that his evidence was strictly correct. The Jury retired for half an hour,.and returned a verdict (after the Judge had left the Court) fur the plaintiff: - THE. POLICE. STEALING :20ACII GLASSES. UNION-HNLL - .—Bishop was yesterday brought \ Izefore Mr. BIRNIE, by GO charged on suspicion of-feloniously breaking. open the coach-house of George Samuel Cotlyer, Esq. of Cle.phain Rise, and stealing threecoach glasses, on the night of the Sth - of last month. • The Patrcic of Camberwell and Peckham stated, that he was on duty early on the rimming in, question, when he pet ceived two men coming out of Mr. Coflyer's premises ; 'they had something in their hands 'which glittered by the light of the moon. The witness lost sight of onctof the pri soners, who went - behind 'some ccittages ; the other, which was the prisoner, Bishop,, seeing the witness following hint, attempted to escape over a hedge, but falling down. the witness came up and took 'hint into custody. Behind the cot- - tage to which ►.he otherarisoner retreated, were found the three glasses, an iron crow, and a pad lock. Mr.Vollyerswore to the fact of hisstablehaving been broke open, and also swore to the gla ,, e s being his property. The padlock which had been found was aho Orb to by• Mr. Collyer, as being the same which had been taken from the Tor of the coach-house. The prisoner was fully coin- Milted for trial. MARLBOROUGH-STREET.—We stated a ftW•(tays since; that four persons were in custody, charged with stealing coach-glasses, via. George %hikes, alias /larding, James Butcher, Freeman, and Franklin, together with Samuel ;Josephs, a Jew receiver. The whole were re-examined vester r day before G. HICKS, Esq. for liorglariously break ing.and entering the dwelling-house of Sir Joseph Bankes, Bart. and stealing several coach-glasses,' of the value of 21. each and upwards. The stables in Dean-street form part ,of the dwelling house in Soho-square. Franklin and Josephs were admitted. witnesses. The former was a hackney-coachman, es well as the other prisoners. lie planned the robbery, and waited in the street whilst Jilkes and Botcher accomplished it. This witness gave a detail of the whole transaction, and Josephs provcd having bought two box-coats of Jilkes, Butcher, and Freeman, and which were identified by Sir Josph Bankes's servants to be the property of their master. Jilkes and Butcher were fidly committed for trial, and Freeman was remanded to answer another cha'rge. 111ANSION-HOUSE.---Yesterday John—nryant was charged by Thomas Alexander. with robbing him of his watch and three gold keys. The com plainant stated, that on Wednesday evening the prisoner pushed violently against him in Leaden hall -street, bet‘vixt. the hours of eleven and . twelve ; and, when he was in the act of falling, had snatched his watch from him, Ot the value of 5/. The pvisoner was parsued and taken, but then property was not found. The statement of the complainant was corroborated by the evidence of others, an.l the prisoner was fully committed. James , Buckmaster, a boy only ten years of age, - was charged by Mr. Smith, a tailor and draper in Houndsditch, with breaking a pane of glass in his shop , window, with a view of stealing some pieces of cloth. The prisoner had been perceived in his operations by a passenger, who took him into custody. • On examination, the window was found to have been broken, and no doubt, but for the interruption, the end in view would soon have been attained. Although so young, iCappeared• that the pri soner had heel) before the LORD MAYOR for a si milar offence, on a former occasion. He was re manded till Saturday. A pentagraph was fraudulently Obtained, ot Tuesday last, from Mr. Bates, in the Poultry, by a well dressed Young than, who ordered it to be sent to him at .the New York Coffee-house; on receiving it, he took the bill and receipt, and pulling out of his pocket a 51. Bank note, and a cheque upon Messrs. Roberts and Co. for 151. 7s. he observed - the note was not sufficient, said he had to meet some gentlemen up stairs, and desired' Mr. Bates's young man to take the cheque to Robarts's, and. return to him immediately with the !uoifey. The cheque was fictitious, and the swindler got clear . off. MILITARY PROMOTIONS. W Regiment of Boot.—To be Lie,itenant•,without purehosef II nsig,ns.G. E. Scott, vice Temple, promoted. IL T: Oal•iel ft um the 14th Foot, vice• Chalmers, promoted. To be'Ensign—John Miintague,Oent. vice Scutt. 530 Ditto—Lieutenant J. 'I revenen, from the 100th Foal , ' to be Lieutenant, vice Campbell, who exchanges. 33th Ditto--vCaptal - n 'l'. Coleman, from the 10Ist.Foot, to b e , Captain of a C,m,•).s»y, without purchase, vice Hall, aP" pointed to the lutst Font. , 57th Ditt,, , —Lieutenant W. Hunt to be Captain of „a Cony' panyywithout purchase, vice -Burrows, promoted. To be Lieutenants, without ,purchase- , --EnsigniS S, Brier!.*:' vice Hunt. William Johnstone, vice Knox, killevl in aclo'.''. Ensign and Adjutant I'. Smith to have the rank. Ensigns, W. B. Bartlett, vice Sankey, killed in action. 6..E.14-= mond, vice. Johnstone, killed in action. To be Ensigns—Vulunteer, William Baxter, vice -Briesler' „Alexander NPFarlane, Cent. vice Johnstone. 58th Ditto—Ensign. .1. B. Dunlop to be Lieutenant, willing !: purchase, vice Chute, promoted. W. G. Sheppard,Gent. to he Ensign, by purchase,vice Dunior", 60th Ditty—Captain J. Stopford to be dajur, by oureliase• vice %Vyndhain, piromuteol in the Regiment of Didon. i • Liiiutenant 'l'. it.'Meade, from ti r 7:::d Foot, to he Canta;ou; th a Company, by purchase, vile Edwards, an...unite_ ti 66th Foot. Gist Ditto—Ensign J. Spier t• betieutcins..c, vice 111.1ver, de ceased. , Serjeant-Major J. Bell, to be i Ensign, rice Spier. , 62d Ditto. To be Lieutenants—M. O'Halloran, from the 96th Foot, pica Bolton, who exchanges. Ensigns J. G. Elrint; - toni 11 ' Davies, A. Knight, It. G.. Daunt, it. Evans, and It. Boole"' from the Sicilian Regiment. To he Ensigns, without purchase—Tohn Mdctsell, Gent. l'i' e Daunt. -- Johnson, Gent. vice Evans. - To be Adjutant, with - the Batik of Ensign—Scrjeant-Mai ° Thomas Russell, from the 43d Foot, vice Bolton, who 5e signs the' Adjutantey only. 6311 Ditto—J,.- W. Evans, Gent. to be Ensign, by pnrell 3 - 41 vice Perceval, pronntell. 64th Ditto—Lieutenant W. C. Oates, from the 98th Foot, t . 7 he Lieutenant, vice Buidisb, who e;xchanges. ' -• 69th Ditto--Captain F. J. Davies, frein the. 311 Ceylon Reg"' meet., to be Captain of a Company, without, purchase, i . fro be Lieutenants, without purchase—Ensign C. W. I 'Pe . vice Downing, promoted.• Ensigns J. Hill, and H. OlJer : Shaw. . . To he EnSigns, without purchase—William MoWitiS, G'- .4t. - vice Hill, and William Bari lett, Gent. vice Oldershivv- 70th Ditto—Ensign J. Egertun, from the 'f t yrone Militi*, "'' be Ensign. 72d Ditto—Lieutenant D. Carmichael to be Captain of i ‘ • Cowpony, vice Itutterford, deceased. • Ensign W. Mackenzie to be Lieutenant, vice earalichael• • • Dean Josias Conroy, Gent, to be Ensign, vice Mackenzie. ~,, ' 77th Ditto—Ensign A.S. l'aulkner, trona the 18:1i Foot , l ' a be Ensign, with Jut purchase, vice Stuart, - I:.- art, oinuted in Or 7th Foot. 76th ditto . . . ~ • , 1..1, To be Captains of Companies, without purchase—Lieut s - ~.•; Campbell Capt. S. Holmes, from the Bth West India R l l2l To be Lientenantg, without purchas e —E t' ,i gn J. Sioith ,,, Ensign and Adj. W. Smith to haVe -the rank. Ensig. l , t 31ozpherson—Ensign F. A. M. Fraser—Ensign W. 1 - 1 . - ,1 1 t . , and Ensign C. M. M.Leud, vice W. Mackenzie, 4"" j Ins wounds. toll , To be Ensign, without purchase—Ensign W. Beale*, ~ the sth Garrison Battalion. Drew, Gent. vice ) I ,„'!‘ pherson—W. Bain M.Alpin, Gent. vice Fraser—amid Intact:l. G. Sinclair, vice Ormsby, killed in actiJa ' Slat ditto—Lieut. T. Collard to be Captill of a Coi O P 3I T ,without purchase. To be Lieutenants, without putchase—Ensigii J. Moha n , • Ensign T. Gibbing* and Ensign .1. Jone s , vice Collart' a j To be Ensigns—C. Irvine, Gent. vice Mullan—and' 5" .: , / ,i, Lieutenant B. Flattery, fr uit' the Royal MoutgomerY ' . litia. , 824 Ditto—Lieutenant G. Wood to be Captain of a Co„: 11 ? - " I ',„ te vice Carroll, deceased. - Eas,ign K. Whitaker to be Lieutenant, vice Wood. Hispital-As IVilliam Mulligan to be Assistant-S°f ge-in, vice Prendergast, placed upon half-pay. • r 861 h Ditto —Captain %%Pillion' Baird to be Nlajur, without' . ' chase.. . • f To b.:. Captains of Companies, without purcliase- -1 ' ,o la m wards, fro Wei Foot. Lieutenant J. Lunn, f ro nt the • - .h.. To be Lieutenants, without purchase.---.-Eiisigiss D. :N. 68 t i' l l i u. Di l t ) fo . — NI C Q a e gin ti .1 * . )' .k .(4 :11,Tt r r r o i Z,. Militia, to be Captain, - , il'" Tu be Ensi-q.s—Ensign M. Claris, from thicreppri;.:. ,14, lain. Jolla Geils, Gent.' by purchase, vice Wi.iht, ° retires. —. from thefl('Ail d i . a Ilk° 89tIrDi: to. To be Lieutenants—Lieutenant J. Waton, from the t r ) 1). Waggon Train, with teinponqy rank. Ensigns 1 "4 :1 ,1, Lewis. F. Miles. G. W. Thompson. J. Petry. G. den, from the 36th Foot. WO' To be Ensigns—William Horne Donkan, vice 111iirs. Nesbit Orange, vice Thompson.. John Macdonalt i, ti e vice Petry. t ye . 90th QittO—Assislant-Surgeon W. A. Hamilton, Sth West India Regiment, to be Assistant-Surgeolh Lawless, who exchanges. 92d Ditto—Brevet-Ma.!or J. Seton, to be Mdjur, 24 * son,dead of his wounds., kn.eut. J. Cattanacb, tv 1 )e of a Canpany, rice Scum. Ensign J. James, to by tenant, vice Cattanach. To be Faisi,,vis---Lieut. J. Cameron % from the Royal East •" • dlesex Militia. John :11'11/off, Gent. vice James. 94th Regiment of Vuut. To be Captains,of Companies, with o ut p urc h ase —Liet - itel s ! . c e D. Munro, vice Gore, deceased ; am! Lieut, J. Bog-a! Cooke placed on the retired list. •soP' To be Lieutenants, witkout purchase—Ensign A. Robe ( ' • vire Munro; and Ensign D. Ogilvy, vice „, 95th ditto—Lieut. C. Deufurd, f rom th e O x f or d !*;: )4 , First Lieutenant, with temptuary rank. Etts'an Sheeati, from the td Somers e t Militi a , t o b e •••;e.:1,i%cl tenant. . , On Wednesday, at Tiatupstead, BlßTHS the Lady of Cliptain . 149 ' t4 • Timbrell, of a daughter. of • d) On the:4(l inst. at Torreis-Hall, near Ongar, the 1 - 4 , Adolphus Houle, Esq. of a gull. . ' MARRIED. l , it' On Monday l as t, a t O verton, Hants, Mr. Newman, o f ~f tle Cain. Hoe Cottage, Bedford s hi re , to Miss Knosv:s' London.. On WQdnrsday last, at St. Paul's, Covent garden, ''?,of 8ew,..0f the, Theatre Royal, Drury-lan e , t o M r. Vi n nin4' the Theatre Royal, Covent-garden. ,', On the 2d inst. at the Abhey Church, Bath, Edwafd p c) ; ;,../' Esq. of Nlontague-place, Russell-square, to dary Alin, Y'' . ' est daughter of John Eames, Esq. of Lytue, Doisetsli;re',l ; X: l'esterday,Joseph Freeman, Esq. of Spring-gardens, to - o f Bell, eldest daught e r o f William Hammond, F.sq. of ) gate. • Nff• U •• The same day, at- St. Saviou r ' s Ch urc h, Southwar , ,L.l . - Thomai Saunders, of upikr Thames -street, Solicitor, t' ' ;sauna, only child of James Goulding . , Esq. of..l3,lal.•itie• _,-•• , PIED. ' . F'' ., On Saturday last, in Lond on , age d 63 years, Charlos. r cols Gni!hem, Marquis de Clermont Loderes. l,i' On Monday last, Mr. Joseph Mil es , Queen's-square, pool. The same. day, in the 30th rear of his age, Robert •'‘ l i';'. Esq. of Wilmington, in Kent. - . 'oll ' , • On Tuesday ey en i ug , at h; s apartments in Benet. ( ~ ,f Cambridge, after a few days illness,- the Her. Niehola 3 ' ' ley Hendry, B.D. Fellow and Tutor of that Society. / .I.,'' The sate day, in Cole Harbour, Surrey, the itiAll t Ale ,- Lady Lucy Taylor, wife of Thomas Taylor, Esq. Cotoptr, General of the Customs. ' ' cool iP On the Ist. inst. S e b ast i an. P r i,L ig, Esq. Prussiau Geueral,in the 75th year of his age. of rf , itsterday morni ng , Jame George, yeungt.st soa Stoddart, DOctors' Commons: _...," PRIM OF STOCKS YESTERDAY. , - Bank Stock, 2GI 262 India Stock, 199 1981 199 Navy i'') per Cent. 914 India Ilitltls, 7,. 3s. Pl'. Irish 5 per Cent. Exckeq. 13il1s, ss. 65.. P r ! 4 par Cent.'Sni ' Ontnittin, 2741 pr. 4 per Sient. lied. 70-, 7 ,-; . • Imperial Ann. ' i t 3 per Cent. Coils. 70 i4i Cons. fortith.~ipril, tith . ApriL Sig Dant; L. AnnAltut ,re a LONDON. Printed In , CARSTAIRS, No.:, to° butldings ; anii published by W. A. SCRIPPS, , of at the SUN-OFFICE, No. 119., Strand ; where Ali rt. " s elJ , 'ilatntsi - Ortlers, Letter's .(punt-paid),&c. must be a1'1"-