The Sun. — London, England, 1814-07-20 00:00:00

1111 PER EA L PA R I.IAMEN T. HOUSE OF LORDS, fivprmy, Jpi.v 19: • MISCELLANV.ntt'S.. • .In a•rranmittee of Prisileges, Counsel were faither heard teseeeting the claims of the Borthwick Peerage.--,Deferred - till this day . se'unight. A considerable nmollero Petitions were presented on the subject of the African Slave Thee, by his Highness the Duke of GeottetsTr.a„Earls SeEscErt, Ros i ttLyNyaadother Peers.— Ordered IC) lis on the table. -7 Earl STANHOPE presented a Petition front certain Grow ers of Corn, which-he said was respectably signed: and de 'sc ibed the object of it to be An , a speedy consideration of the subject referred to inbis tesohition 'before their Lordships, respecting the adoption of measures for the doe encourage tomit of Agriculture,, by abolition of certain burthensome 'taxes, ' • • The Earl of HABDWICKE deprecated any prematute this tussion of the subject to which the Noble Earl referred; and mowed 't hat the consideration of the subject be deferred loan ' other Session. Earl STANHOPE. spoke in explanation, and moved that the Petition do lie on the table. The LORDCHAN(:ELLOR thought that the point before their Lordships 'was one'Of considerable impottance. The petition Was presented in reference to a notice of„ a motion, .Ited it was a serious question, elkether a petition could be re ceived upon the ground ofa notice for a motion?. The Earl of HARDWICKE was o f opiniii that' the pet)- a tion was clearly:suggested by the reiolUtieu of the Noble Lord. . . , . After some 'further consideration upon' the point between the above-Mentioned Peers and the Earl of Lauderdale, it was 44;,:reed that the discussion should be deferred till to-motrow. Earl STANHOPE said ,he had another Petition to present, which, though upon a different subject, was one of great ins ,portance: Being - read, it appeared to be front a Mrs. Mary -Tana - ell, complaining of her premises being forcibly cntet*l by three Revenue Otlieers, op an information .that sh'e . Nazi Yre•nch glbyes hr lier posFession,- whets, in fact, no contraband articles whatever were foninl—that the damages we're laid at soot. She was acquitted by.the Jury, but the' expence at teltding the process was considerable, &c. The:Noble Earl I••.'as of opinion, th e allegation's were worthy the, serious cqn, tideration of the House, with reference to the existing system •of the Excise Lawi, and moved that the Petition do lie ()tithe Table.—Ordered. „ • • . . - The Woollen Burying Bill passed through a Committee of the whole Htruse, and was reported. • linarounnittec on - the Northern Lights Bill some discussion look place. In the result, it was ordered that the further consideration of the subject should be deferred tilt to , morrow. THE VRINCESS CHARLOTTE OF WALES. • . The Duke of SUSSEX.—." My Lords, I confess .5 rise with a considerable . degree, of embarrass-, Itient, not unmixed with a certain • degree of ,aniety,- on the. very ;important and interesting tl , ecasion on which I am about to address you.— On these, -hovtever, I shall not detain your Lord ships, further than the expression of my hope, that the Noble ',old opposite' Will satisfactorily answer those questions which I think it my duty, :tinder the circumstances of the case, to put to the Noble Lord. I confess, my Lords; that in put ting those questions, my wish is to be considered as doing it perfectly distinct and separate from any party questiou whatever 3 that I do it purely from my ovhl feelings of duty, .and unauthorised ,by any indivicfnalwhiitever. The questions in one . sense; lam aware, is put' under very awkward circumstances, though relative to an event known - to most of the Noble Lords who hear me, and re specting which I may not coneur'in opinion with other persons who have been consulted, but foV whose conduct I entertain every possible respect. I hope, my Lords, 1 may be allowed` to put the folimving questions—but if an y Nr;ble Lord feels any difficulty in try putting them now,, I am ready * 1 to reserve them for anti opportunity that , may arise Order." - • After a short pause; his Royal Highness pro ceeded- -1 wish to know, from the Noble Lord, in the first instance, whether, since the removal of her Royal Highness the Princess Charlotte of Wales, to Carlton House, her Royal Highness has bad that degree. of communication with her friends end connections, which her Royal Highness bad previous to her leaving Warwick House?" After a another pause—" If the Noble Lord does, riot choose to answer this que?tion,.l Shall, of course know. bow to take it.—But I again ask the Noble Lord, if her Royal Highness the Prin cess Charlotte has had the same degree of com munication with her friends and connections, _since her removal to Carlton House, that she bad while she remained arWarwick House ? next wish to ask the Noble Lord, if her ROyal Highness the Princess Charlotte of Wales, since her removal to Carlton House, has had tlit li berty of communication in writing and 4 . letter —of receiving and sending letters—and the use of pens, ink, and paper—that she bad while at War wick House i • "I have next to ask, whether her Rovul High ness the Princess Charlotte of Wales is, since her residence at. Carlton House, in that state of li berty which persons considered not as in confine ment ought.to be in ? "The fourth queition I have to ask is, whe ther, in the course of last year, her Royal *less the Princess:Charlotte of Wales was not re commended, as proper for the state of her health, the use of the. sea bath ; and, whether it is not understood that the same has been recommended to her Royal Highness this year ? " The fifth question, my. Lords.is, whether her Royal Highness the Princess Charlotte of Wales, having arrived at the age oreighteen years and a half, past the period when Parliament has fre quently recognised the capacity of persons of the Royal Pathily to assume t4,e ,government df the country without assistance; whether there is any intention fur providing an establishment °suitable Mr her Royal Highnes 4 , 'and 'proper for her to lire and appear according to her due rank in that society, over which, I hope, it will be her lot one day to reign ?" The Earl of LlNTEnroot:.---" My Lords, it is Perhaps my duty to apOlogize to your Lordships fur even making, any observations upo...i the ques tions put by the ilinitrious Duke. There .can exist no doubt, my Lords;.in many cases, that• ad vaiages may result in pu i tting questions upon sub jects of great public importance, of great political and national moment, to the; Ministers of the Crown. But I leav e it to your. Lordships to feel fau4 to consider wh et h er upon 'a subject of the pe- Culiar nature of the present, the questions put are questions which ought to he an3wercd ? Upon your judgments, and uponyour feelings, I will most willingly And freely rest the decision.— (Hear, hear, hear)-11 . 4 Lords, the Prince Re gent,'as actinein he.11:1111e and On the behalf of Iris MilieStV, is, the ,Father of the Roy a l and he has the exclusive right to regulate the edu cation not only of his own children, but of the other ebilaren of the AnyAi Family ; if there iveee hear !)-1 ask, lily Lords, what in. stance is .t here Of Parliament havin ,, interfered in a proceeding; a this nature ?. yVithout eluding into possible or extreme cases,. I wish th.know, my Lords ; what ground the illastrious:Dnke has laid for any Parliamentary inteffetence or proceed ing upon this case, or that should induce us to • concur in ,any - ?—(1 - lear, hear, - hear am sure,- my LoFds, that in: - :the — exereise of his legitimate, right, the Prince Regent has, adopted no regula tion with respect to the Prineess Charlotte, that' has not for its object, and for its clew, her Royal - Highness's own benefit, interest, and advantage' and that his feelings towArds her are purely those • of a Sovereign and a Father ; feelings and duties which are notonty imposed upon hi m by t he l aws of the c oun t r y, hut impressed .npon him by nature. And I trust your .Lordships will believe, when you,come to consider, thainnder circumstanCes like the present, the Great Person to whom I may al- lude, Would be very far from concurring himself in any - act with respect to • the Illustrious Persc;nage . in question, but upon the fullest sense of its con tributing to her happiness, her comfort, and her honour !--(hear, hear !)—And I think, my - Lord, I should not discharge my - own duty, or consult my own feelings'or the sense and feelings of the flouse, if I add another word mote." The Duke of Su SSEX disclaimed, in what he bad said,,the least idea of, expressing any - thing dis- • respectful towards the Illustrious Pcrson alluded 'to. But as he was not satisfied with what had Wien from the Noble Lord,' he fele it his duty - to, give. notice; that - On Frid4 next, he should make a motion on.the subject. Ills Royal l-lighness then moved, that the- 'Lords be sunniloned for Friday next. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, be could not re main silent upon this cyJcasiori..• The 11IustriO l is Duke had said, he meant riot to say any thing dis respectful towards the Great Person alluded to.— He was persuaded his Royal flightless ...did not. But he must take the liberty of saying, that ii- his Noble Friend had answered the questions put to. him, under the circumstances of , the case, he - could not do so, tvithout being guilty of a breach of, his dulyrin the opinion - of any man upon earth. - He would have• betrayed his duty - to his Sovereign, and he .would tell his Noble Friend, that if he had answered the first part of thesegitestions, he (Lord E.) ‘vorild never have-tonversed again•with him. What was meant by. the question, whether the Illustrious Person referred to was allowed the same sort of intercourse With her friend - Sand con.' nections, (it might as well be said with • her ene mies), while liv under: th e roo f o f h er • Father ? • Could th ing; be said not to be an •impit tation ? But •he must look upon, it • as ; an ani madversion upon the Ministers of . the" Crown, with reference to supposed advice• He Would then only say, that the Great Person alluded to: had the exclusive right to lirect.the education-of his child, and that no man' had a right• tointer• pose ; and a very strong ground i n d ee d , m u st he previously established, to warrant the interposition of Parliament, with respect to advice so given and followed. And with rthrence . to - the'whole of conduct of theGreatTcrsonage alluded to, toWard3 the Illustrious Personage in question, he had the istacttorvot being able to state in the face of tint eminery, that he, at least, was deserving of the applause, and not the censure of mankind—(Hear!) The Duke of SUSSEX shortly explained, that whatever remarks he had madeonigfit be construed into an animadversion upon the conduct of Mini sters upon the occasion ; but that he did not con ceive it possible to construe what he had said in the way of disrespect towards the Great Person alluded to. Their Lordships were then, ordered to be stun moiled for Friday. - • Viscount SIDNIOUTII gave wOtice of his intention to move the second reading of the ,Irish Peace Preservation Bill on Thursday, fur which day their Lordships were ordered to lie summoned, on the motion of the Xuble'Secretary of State. • The remaining Bills upon :theVahle were then forwarded, and tl►e House adjourned till to•morrow. HOUSE OF COMMONS. • • Several Petitions against the Slave Trade were presented, which were ordered to lie on the Table. The Cletgy Residence Bill and the East India Continuation Bill Were read. a third time,,and passed. - The Thames Police Bill was committed. Report to-morrow.. On 'the Motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHE QUER; the House went into a Committee on the Duke of Wellington's Grant. A Resolution was proposed and agreed; to, that in ease of the failure of heirs male, the lands-of the Noble Duke shoUld descend to his neNt female heirs. POST OFFICE PACKETS. Lord NUGENT rose, for the purpose he said, of moving for some papers relative to an action which took place on the 3d of November last, between the Lady Mary Pelham and Montague packets, and the, Globe, an American privateer. His Lord ship .contended that , Mr. Watkins, the Com mander of one of the packets,, did not merit the rewards he received from the Post 7 l)ifi ce ,i n consideration of his conduct, and that Mr. :Per ring, 'who commanded the other, had acquitted him Self with the uttnoSt zeal 'and bravery ; this, he. had no doubt, would appear, if the papers. re-. lative i to this transaction were produced. 1-1 e would therefore move, that there be laid upon' the table copies of th e R eports o f the Courts of 'ln qUiry, together with the correspondence that took place relative to an action fought off Madeira, on ,• the 3d of November last. Mr. LusinNoroN was confident', that when 'the papers were produced, the imprcsSion would be different• to what is now on the mind of the NOble Lord. It would then appear, that the Pelham did not get. the assistance she was entitled to, and the consequence was, th a t s h e was forced to throw the packet overboard.. " • .14ird NU GENT said, he did not mean to impute any blame to Mr. Watkins, for throwing the mail overboard. Mr. PRESTON had no douht . htit it would ap pear, from the papers, that the conduct of Mr. Perring.was highly honourable. On the motion of -Sir E. BRIDGES, the Annual Produce of the Revenue vested in the Misters of theßounty of Queen Anne, together with the, ch!cuments relative, to this Bounty, were ordered to be laid uponthe table. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved, " That the Report of the Spirit Intercourse Bill to betaken into-fur titer consideration. ,But Motions having precedence of Or ders, the SPEAKER said,. that the Hon. Gentlemen who had given notice of MotionSovere now.at liberty to proceed with them. •• LORD COCHRANE._ Lord EBRINGTON said, he ruse to make the mo tie❑ of which he had given notice,; but before fie • • protetik 4 l ltc would lief;leave to read to the Hdtise a lett.efi he 'had received from Lord Cdchrane. It " • was to the.followitig.pprport • - jien , alrj 17. Mr tonn.z.—Altjid r ikh I claim no rit:a to interfite with the Parliiitnentar, &induct of any MeMber, or to inquire into the motives for any motion he' play thitili proper to Make, yet - I owes it 0 - Myst-VW protest against that motion of which your Lordshili has given notice, as I conceive that it has a tendency tu bringidown upon me greater grief than . Ishotildotherwise experience ; a s I did not expect to be treated by youi Lord ship on any ground that- bears reference to my past services. flowerer erroneous rosy be the esththite of a late transaction in the minds of mibiyMenibers,- - 1 cannot consent that any service of -mine slimild he prostitnted to protect me froni liu- Aishment. If guilty," I deserve the punishment to which the, law has sentenced Inc ; if innocent, no part of the s e nt e n ce ought to he inflicted. If, theref o r e , your Lordship still 'per sists ih the motion of which you have given mince, I hope and trust you will do me the justice of reading this letter to the House." Lord EBRINGTON then proceeded to declare what he thought Might now be deemed superfluous, namely, that he had had no communication, di. reedy or indirently, with Lord Cochrane ; and if he were to comply with the wishes of that Noble Lord, he should not now proceed with his mo tion.. But feelings that the sense of the country was against the infliction of the penalty,'he could not. but. believe that the prosecution of his motion would be leSs injurious to the Noble Lord than the punishment, which its object .was to avert. For himself, he could have wished that the sub ject had been taken tip hysome person more com ps tent to the task ; he .coithr have wished that it had originated on the other side of the House; it would have been gratifying to him totind it taken trp by. his Majesty's Ministers, or rather, that those tisters s by a Particular.interference, had rendered it unnecessary. In what he intended to say s _ he should abstain from any discussion, of the circuntstance,s which had caused a, de b ate on a former occasion. However erroneous he might think the decision on .that occasion—whether any doubt existed, of the guilt of Lord Cochrane,-he did not feel that the House ought on this occasion to s. make any reference to those opinions. He therefore should not call on them to respirer ally opinion as to the Noble Lord's guilt or innocence_ 101 l he wished was, that they should hearstesti-. moray: to the great merits and eminent professional services, of the Noble Lord. With respect to the severity of the punishMent that has beenspro nounced; he should not connect this topic with the present • subject . ; but he could not help say ing, that the punishment of the • pillory in ge neral was one which was a disgrace to •the enlightened times and country in which we live, because it - renders the populace both the judge and executioner of the culprit, and•according to their blind caprice, affords either a scene of Mockery and degradation, or in some instances, leads to a cruel death.. Those who recollected the scenes which had passed in the City no longer ago than last year, and they need not be reminded for what the wretches . were thus punished, would surely be. of opinion, that it was wrong.to inflict such a penalty in s case& where it was only intended as punish- Tent,: and not as disgrace. On looking over different sentences , in three years front 1812, there appeared to ,be only three persons who had stood in the pillory for crimes of the above description; -and he would ask, whether a man who has done such services as Lord Cochrane has performed, ought to receive a puniShment'of•so.ignominious a kind. Why should- the law he strained to its utmost severity towards a man who has certainly contributed as much as' any individual of his rank to the public benefit ? The services of Lord COch-. ranc were so well known ; that it was needless recapitulate them ; but he could not h e l p , on t h e present occasion, recalling the attention of the:A House to one of .his most genera exploits. He alluded to the capture of the El Gelto, a Spanish dispatch vessel, 6f,thirty-three guns, by the ship which • his Lordship .commanded, carrying only fourteen guns and fifty-tour men ; and did not think ,that any action more gallant could be found upon out' records. Ile would desire to be. read the Vote of Thanks on this oce s asion, which was given by, the House to Lord Gambier and Ads. mire! Stopford, on the 1t:111 of January 1.8.10. (The vote was read accOrdiegly . by the Clerk).— Such„resumed his Lordship, was the tribute paid by the House to the services of Lord Cochrane, for which, he belived, the. Noble Lord was-far-• then rewarded with the Ribband and'Order of the Bath. When after a rank. so . meritoriously ac quired, 'we find his name strtiA. out of the:list, and the ribband taken from him, shall we not ad . - mit, with : regret, that his punishment is greater than that of Butt and Detßerengers?:These per sons, when the period of their confinement was over, would return to their original 'obscurity, atul.by changing their names; if they thought fit, might with perfect ease regain their former sta tion in society. Even the sentence on a Noble Marquis, for the crime of seducing seamen from his Majesty's service, accompanied as' it was by a fine, trivial in comparison with his large fortune, Was mild, when contrasted With that of Lord Cochrane. He was aware that the cases were not exactly analogous. But what was the conse quence ? The Noble -Marquis, after the period of hiS imprisonment, returned to his rank in society. But if we look at Lord Cochrane, We shall find 'With regret, that he will return, deprived of all his honours, all his rights as a citizen, all the re wards be has gained by his distiugUished services ;. every thing he'possess e s of . Va lue taken away from him. Is thi s even the 'proper measure of English, justice ? Is it even consistent with the foundation. "4 , 1 all Jaw, which teaches us to make.no distincL Lion between individuals ? He did slot think it ne cessary to trpursle the 'House any farther; he trusted he had strictly adhered to the intention which he had proposed to. himself, and the ,only objectwas to prevent the infliction of a, i(i.irilishment Upon the Nobl e L or d ; he disgraceful o fs w h ich Should therefore arose —" That an humble . Ad dreSs be presented to the Prince Regent, praying that he would be graciously pleas : ed to remit to Sir Thomas Cochrane, conunOtny 'called Lord Cochrane, the ignominious .punisliment .of the pillory." • • Lord NUGENT, concurring in every thing which had been uttered . by his - Noble Friend, should give: I►is,.Cordial support to the motion. - Ile also felt the propriety of abstaining from any allusion to 'that point on which the noose had come.. to a decision, name!y,-tlte Noble,.L►ud'S. guilt.. He should, however, trouble the House with a few words on tke great character of Lord Cuchraue. The evidence td thiS eff'ect, which haft Igeen4i ve - e lroti o trial, was not th at p oor an d sv hi o i n g c hodo' on ordinary occasions ; Of persons who oil! i a defendant many years, and never knew 3 1 e Ilia against hini till the la•eSerit time. 1, - ; "'' t e. o° l racter of Lord Cochrane, we were to 1 00 1, ere ll' proudest pages of the British- history, ''''. , stands distiogiiished in the first rail', who" country's service. Such Was - the Mot t . o t T' ir c liff' ti plea was this night offered, and %Adios ° , d eut irri! racter was now so - cruelly staioed. f°, iL tb e • -ild' with his- Nohle Friend who , bad inove"Aols' dress respecting the natitre of ttle•P` l4b. be ) A r and the comparative severity of ' t what would be felt by the otherTpersdus ed ; and he would add, that all those l o ce''' any doubts the other night as to thel', lllD- t i,eii the Noble Lord,- were bound to vote I % )l. ? • e tccf`', tion of to-night. Supirdse a soldier. Was : ec tic" in defrauding his superior Officer, in c°l t i t e o : With his Oaptaiu ; that they.would bring to the halbert was to be expected, but li4 d, whether they would flog the Captain. Ir he would only s ay, w o that they nI o ll ct , L c ', gross act o f i njust i ce. A s to t h e riitiw .) ;,,tg, punishment upon a great man becomes ''. c and cruel to r t ure , b y exc i t i ng i n the publ.,l,ool':, every base feeling, and encouraging the most reprehensible p ass i ons. - H e wool" the length of agree i ng w i t h what the 11'Wkit,40e' bad said in his own vindication in to t h ,de, " inculpatin g th e e l evate d personage Wlo nounced the sentence ; but when person . ' standing forw ar d i n . that 131° , 1i :1 '10) 5 asserting that a part o f t h e ev id e nce. '';: vi tit e suppressed, an d ment i on i ng other cireu n tl ,c which bore h ar dly upon him, and 'prevea ve - b o o possibility of his offering all that could adVanced in his behalf when lie heard ',if,' making ,th• most solemn assece rit ioq the face of GOd and the country, that had a proper opportunity of defenderg arid entreating the_ House to go i n to a 6 " 11T :e.o el. 0 0 he felt then, atullie felt still, th a t the °ll As oo t not Justified in refusing th a t Committe e ' the Noble Lord, he scarcely knew many occasions in that He it l<"' fortune to differ ,from him, ; but he t 1104 ',1 it'Was his boldand manly feeling Which bile!'t'ry made him stand forward th er e ;though c ' hg t very discreetly, and he was o f _opinion was no man in that Houser however he 111ju i ` l o t fer from that N o bl e Lord i n political 0 1 1i : 11 °I ; would not put his hand on hi s - h ear t atto,l' ' lof : he •regretted that part o f t h e sentence rvb ic ed the object-of the motion. .11)411°a; The SOLICITOR-GENERAL disclaime 6 nality or prejudice towards Lord Coeh rji °P e . , had he , any reason o f any sort, Five" ( , ) , 1 1(l'il, ' I b i t wise, to influence him i n t h e vote he 4°-1, beyond his d u ty as a M em b er of Parlianlen.ol'ili 'his duty dictated to him to give his dcc i i,- . lb a c l i e. gative to th e mot i on. T he Noble i li suppOsed to be a victim to political fle i. '" .. j itill'', o) but never vas any opinion less founded` _, t lamented more sin cere l y t h a n hi mse lf, C •e% of his noble birth; who' had perforo- -ti ploits in a profession which destroys, 'noble minds, all sordid motives ; that o' 4 '4 the commis s i on o f a cr i me so sord id es t`i-cf' have fallen from his high rank, and " ;;1i1"' .43 0` himself the subject o f au ;lions Poi,' v or was much to be deplored; but he wo ult f %cliC e / that he was m ore an object for the iitte l ' i t :qic'tv that ,House th an any o f the other delitti'incil There was no excuse or palliation pail of 'his L or d s hi p f or th e c oin"' cs $ 4 a fraud which, if true, combined 11„,'"rlele infamy. The comparison, of the . . 04 ", - 3 .so' l a . who had quoted a suppositious case "( en te ll ,l, l ; and his. Captain, in reprobation of thc i i ' d TA" t ,',V was most entraordinary. But why sh° _ .superior Officer be brought to i g nontioi"' co illi' l , meat, it he deserved it, as well as flit', soldier ? Only because the military !Int ( lid a ''' ` admit of it. But ina case of fraud, PO l ;bc ;Civil Law, would any man say that t he , r of meat of the Meanest private, or the of ic , L , f, highest rank,,ought to be,difTerent, or.' 1 1 0 1 ( 1 the , former punished, the latter 51101 , e lowed to tamper with mercy ?• 011- 0 - be blamed, because his situation ' and err of r- `, ) V. to bare placed him above the tempted° Miffing such a crim e ; while the oth er instigated by poverty or Other s , 'wourd render' him an object of pity. T h i e . should rather operate the other waY' (. o , r oo' Noble if merey be extended by the Noble Lord has" no greater right 10 '.` toa ti"` l t be one of the individuals in the same ,:,„ss t ° l 4( 1 himself. The. Noble Lord, in his. A ( ```'• c oe''',;t, b il e o e u n s s e t , ll l4 ) t zsve . t i l i t e liat a part of bis ' 11 :0 1 to state,. that: .was was ( so ut ! ! i t t o s 'Member. of Parliament, and an 0 1,-,c li c e ' 11,1(1 e lr. Court, to declare, most solemnly, that )1.01 I h (favoured aS . Much • ,•bJe to in t ` t as possl self on the suhjeet, by reading attentiv e! t he 1111(1 trallsPireil, both as evidence, an d it u p :meats of th e N o bl e Judge whnslin i°l , e( t i, 11°tts , at' he would d•celar‘e, before God that if lie had been on the JilrY , Ije oth°1.61)1• in his conscience, have returned 80' 1 . t bc diet than that which was given, crel' • de aCe fhe ii Lord had been his brother. Tb e evl, in his mind most clear and con vilie he found Deßerenger traced into the h° 6oo oil 1 4 • Cochrane, with the coat of il U r Si ti od bill :d e I back,. goin g th ere at t h e c h an ce of, 0 pers ilj ul c of meeting his Lordship, n othing sh clu to t be'P ccr ; him that Lord C. had not b e en • priv.Y A to Li e pose of his vi s it, an d t h e o bje c t it If this had not been. the ca se, his I.mr ( t i ) ,, would have .b een t h e l ast p l ac e it' cot which he would h ave gon e With t hat r oof t ` hack. Besides, be had been correctlY • es sesl.4, r %c ity o i tc Dover, have been dressed in the very sal" drc o ' s t 5 1 1! . c. „ 0 01 or and proved, by a series ol a y he goes to Lord' Cochrane's. The j , ; .„ lie 1 " ;, ant fact, therefore, arose out of t , '• • r •! He had been traced into the coach " itle' t on his back, and by mere acciden t was indubitably proved ; .st r ti answer to the interrowatories, of c rel. her el dress a he could not remember the he t son who got into his coach, Yet v ., ir \OP 11 ,0 i t his, because hiS coat was red , V Rere' l . - Co c to escape detection* won't! De if La rd put hisizself under the protegtiun f o r 'th iiirboofr,