The Sun. — London, England, 1814-08-02 00:00:00

VACCINATION. TO T!IE EDI'VOit OF THE SUS% Mtt.;lebur7,ll,l2l:l) 1814. Sts.-1 heleaveto inclose the copy of 'a letter lA-':tell I ttrm rite liberty Of writing —to L' u 'd att,r lie had nrought forward the Bill for • re-:I rittni-!• t sire prmlice of Inocithiting f o r t h e a , ;( 1 o f which T forwarded copies to Cie Lord COaocellor and Lord Penhorough.— The ,net • the fate which it justly deserved, end it Will serve to cinviuce tl e People of this ~Entpire, 'rim: they may Ithice implicit 'confidence -in the wisdom and integrity of their higbet Court . z of Justice. • The Ptil - Aic were not aware of , the -klaturt of the measure -; for under the musk of allowing the praCtice of hottilation to be Conti such a Bill was framed as mast have pre-: yented every person possessed 'or the smallest feel and cooinion sense from having recourse to, -Sult-tIH - k ux inoculation ; and the Public must have ,been coerzed to employ the practice of whatever were their sentiments upon the security which it conferred. The fact is, the Na tional Vaccine Institution could pot dare to'bring in a - Bill -openly, to' prevent the ftwther Ipocula tion of Small-pox; hut' artfully coutri%ed the expedient which is now thrown out of the House ur Lords. Indeed, the provisions of the Bill Were SO whintSicat and so absurd, that after undergoing every possible alteratioci, it was still found wholly inarhnissAlle. ; and, I (1,0, cay, the National' Vac clue Eitablishittent now sincerely regret they ever made such a despicable' attempt to - support the 3ennerian Practice. Indeed, tha fate of their Bill may be considered as the -commencetnert dr. rn ther the signal for the overthrow of the VaeOine •Practiee, zold, a distinct avowal from the highest authority, of the authenticity and force, of.all the facts which have been froln time to time brought forward against the efficacy of the Jenfterian dis co.--ery,. as an antidote against Small-pox. eon • As my communications on t h is subieet have hi therto met with the Indulgence of being inserted in your impartial Piiper, I trust you - wilt hptve the goodness to grant toe the smite favOur now. I am, dear Sir, yoPr most obliged, THOMAS BROiV N. TO LORD BORRINC;DON. My Loßn;---f take the 1 berry of addressing. vont. Lordship concerning the Bill which you have submittd to Parliament upon the subject of Vaccination. I am fully satisfied 'your Lordship most have 'been perfectly convinced of the pro piety of this rneastire ; bitt you annst forgive me for ohserving, that I entertain strong, suspicions this Bill does not originate from your Liord§hip's own ideas upon the subject; hat that your anxiety 'to confer a benefit upon the,Put;liic, togt:ther kith your goOdness.Of heart; have exposed. you to be .ititlitence,d-by•fhe officious zeal and indu,,try of interested people:, Atict Our judgMent goaded and 'overpowered by . the exertions and declarations :TV th.e-NatioliarVaccine-Establisbnient. AltliCnight . the draught of the 11, my Lord, - Which I have perused, does not contain any fla ,grantly Violentantl compulsory measures, yet it is easy to sec, it-contains such clauses : as must effec tually prevent every person who has an y . regard (or the esteeni of the respectable. part of mankind, from having recourse-to the Small-pox Inocula. thin for the security of their :children. :yim surely cannot but be •aware, my'Lord, - that . large red fiags, hospitals., notices, certificates, &c. &c. can not possibly he submitted to, by any man alive to the 'dignity of 'a Briton; and rather than have his jUdgment pointed mit, as a beacon to others, and 4lisgraceful to himself, he must either. acquiesce in the practice of Vaccination, or leave his child exposed•tothe influence of the natural Small-pox. :`I .can assure you, my Lord, I should be the last person to oppose the practice of Vaccination, and could have wished your Bill had gone much fay ther, had the Jennerian discovery only maintained its character as a security against the Small-liox contagion; hilt, my Lord, when facts have suc ceeded facts, and a shade has been thrOwn around the practice, which the very warmest advocates ,of Vaccination dare not attempt to, and cannot dispel in.a regular and professional manner, and .:31;hicit the most respectable and. enlightened of We Medical profession candidly acknowledge, I flatter myself, your Lordship must perceive the -impropriety and danger of coercing the - people of Treat Britain with such a Bill as that now before the [louse. , I am unwilling to tease or harrass your Lord ship with many, observations, but as I am con vinced you have no other wish hut to serve the in habitants ofthe Empire with fidelity and honour, you will permit me to state, for your Lordship's perusal, the following facts upon the present state of the Jennerian 'Practice:— 1, The whole history of Vaccination is now in the most complete state of uncertainty and con fusion. Indeed it can be distinctly proved, that all those who formerly have written in defence of Vaccination, differ very widely concerning many of . the Jrrost important points. of the Jennerian doctrine—a - nd the facts innimical to 'this -dis covery, have now arrived to such magnitude, that not one of its former warm and ready advocates dare write a professional examination : and defence of the subject. - 2. The facts adverse to the perfection of the practice of Vaccination, had arrived to such an extent in 1810, that the original Vaccine Institu tion considered it a duty which 'they owed to the Public and themselves, to publish the following declaration of their sentiments upon so important a subject:--" 'that there iibw existed" the most authentic and conclusive proof that Small-pox. have occurred after the most perfect form of Vac,: cination ; that the. number and severity of these cases had increasedin a ratio, correTonding with the distance from. the commenceincntiof Vaccina ,tion ; and tlmt the wh o l e history and phenomena the Jernterian discovery hive hitherto been un derstood and investi gate d : " . ' perfectly 3. That .cases of '.mall-pox after_ Cow- 7 nox, have : attended the practice of every Medical Prac,. titioner. in Great Britain—even not excepting, Dr. jemner himself—and .th 6 same Consequences have 1 I Ettlent....t. nose w %vele • • vaccinated by Institu tions and Societies. • I. All thy different excuses which have hepn made itsc •of, to defeat tire- cases of Small-pox which daily oce , o• atLer the Vac:itte Process, are %rito:iv destitnCe of i tr , ith, and c-m he proved, most .dis tinnly, Iftaxe to fon:l(l4'6cm its the l'a' , :tifte phenomena. it 'eau also be proved , irt the tbost sat isfitiqoyy mannet, there is no mystery; dexterity, ur parti 'cubit Iota) in communicating tin: Vaceine disease,. which , canbot be 'readily understood and percortu .ed by any medical practitioner tvl;ate"er ; and the. claim set up by Vwccine .Establishments, to (ix elusive abilities in conducting the process,' not . , only destitute of every shadow of truth, but is the. nt.,st: consummate triter: of vackery ever attempted .npon the people of this tlmpire,_ and the grossest insu:t to the Medibal PrOfession in genefal. t. It is - a notorious 'fact, -that although the Public • have submitted to the Vaccine practice from the express assurance of being fully and per manently protected against Sinall,-pox, yet .they noW, both, from their oven conviction; as well as by the. express . desire of the ver}. - ,-adeOcates of the. Jennerian discovery, carefully 154111:4 every COIIIIIIII - with those wbo labour under the Small ptix.—Also ill the tastlndies, the. Island of Cey lon and other settlements, 'the very Practitioners . who insist upon the complete protection afforded by the Vaccine. Process, ami will not allow of any on.e case where the Cow-pox' has-hecil succeeded by Small-pox------the Moment a c;:se of Sm a ll-pox snakes its appear,arite,ihe - y iminesliatdy sitrrottud and insulate. the not only with atten drllll.3, - gititrAlave ht - eit ail pre . yiOlisly va•reitsated., but they are again .reyikeinated. not, darnsg-to trust to the first process—Ot course di•tinedy ar,• knoWledging the inperfc'et and temporary powers of Vaecitiation.• • • 7. It has been generally stated to the Public, as a decisive recommendation of :he Vaccine Prae tice, that an immense saving of lives has been', and would - be the consequence of ihe adoption of Vac.' dilation ;• . but- the •fact is not so. The Rills of :Mortality in London and elsewhere, clearly shew' that, upon the whole, nostich saving has taken phici;; and that since the first intrOduction of the Jennerian Practice, nearly - nn equal iimnber have died ariniißlly; 'Anil that, although there might live 11 - eert fewer who died of Small-po x , still the Untntler lost, upon the whole, to the public, %vas rather increased than diminished--klearly pointing out, that the Vaccine Process seemed to have an effect in rendeying several iEsenses,,to which the human body Was subject, incite fatal 8. Bit what is likely to be still more fatal to the interest.of the bnit [minify is, that, for these three or four years. back ;a considerable increase of deaths, arisiug'from anatural Small-pox, has taken. place this fart, invotyes a most important point—is this owing to ne4ltet in having recourse to theTaccine Process, without having any' aversion br prejudice agAiust it, but - merely apathy and carelessness ? does it arise front a large propintion . Of the Public bein'g 'convinced the -Vaccine PractiCe confers no proper, security, .and will not employ it any more ; . and.-they either cannot, or will not, have recourse to inocolation,me Smali 7 pox ? What ought to he done in this situation ? Is it not likely that great mischief is to he apprehended from doing nothing? The subject should be fairly and strictly investi gated ; , some plan adopted, and rendered uni versal. .1 . Lastly, It is a striking, and, in my opinion, an unanswerable fact, and for the truth of which I appeal to the whole Medical Professioq, that all the difirent facts which are now known concern ingVaccinatiOn, are wholly inexplicable, while we contend. fur the permanent and complete anti veriolops power of the Vaccine Process ; but if a feeble, partial, and temporary power is adniitted, all difficulty vanishes, and perfect harmony per- Italics the whole subject. I have now, 'My* Lord, stated the leading fea., tures of the present state of the Jennerian disco vet•y; and which, nOtwithStanding- the late flaming and pompous report of the-National Vaccine Es 7 tablisloncnt, I distinctly aver, may he readily proved before a proper court of inquiry. l•nrist also assure your .Lordship, this Establishment has made a gross violation of truth, as.well os discre tion, by asserting, that those who noW oppose the Jeuneriau practice, are interested, designing, and ignorant. Ido not hesitate to affirm, 'that the charge may be retorted with More truth and justice. It, is easy to see, my Lord, they may have interested motives, as both their pocket and character must suffer, if the Jennerian practice is overthrown, while the emoluments 'arising from. Vaccination to a private practioner are equal to those of inoculation, and the. practice which arose from Natural Small..pox; was in general of a gra tuitous nature. Besides, from what has been said of the Bills of Mortality, it would appear, those who are anxious for much practice should press the Vaccine InocUlation to be continued ! ! ! But, my Lord,..in order to put an end to all argument and assertion,. I have only to beg you will not proceed further with the Bill now before their Lordships before ad inquiry has been ap pointed, and. a proper report math upon the sub ject by a court of intelligent and impartial men, There bas been no regUlar investigation since 1805, and surely the facts which have occurred since that period are more than sufficient to jus tify such a measure. If the National Vaccine EJ". tablishment should object to this mode of pro ceeding, it must, I think, be unavoidably con cluded, they dare not stand an impartial inquiry, and are afratl of,trusting the subject out of their own hands. But surely, my Loyd, neither you nor the Public.will allow themselves to he sported with upon a subject of such national and indivi .dual importance, and no persenal - consideration will ever be allowed to interfere. with securing the public safety and happiness. I hope wad trust, - my Lord, as the toaclistoae Of the motives of the N;itional Vaccine Establishment is so simple and so satisfactory, yourtortiship mill have the good, nesoo press ,the Bill no further,l , before such an inquiry as that.which I have= proirosed shall have taken place ; and if the Jennerian practice shall il len c ontinue. to be recommended or reserve, I shall not 'only'eheerfony ac trtisce with your Loraship's hitt g i ve the practice of Vaccination tits' best support. I am, my Lord, Your Lordsbi»'sinost (obedient,- humble' , Servant, THOMAS BROWN, Surgeoa, Alussiel4urg - b. Novembti 15, 1813. 1 SEEDS. Red.. Clover (FOreign) - llitto.Englsli . • —s —s to 4D5 . ,:10s . Whitetlittw........; ... Rye-Grass . Turnip, ‘Vtitte . Fed and Gre4o, ~.. White Mustard Seed .. Bruvm ditto . . Ciirraway Sued* . . 70s Od to 593 Oti Coriander de 90s Oir to 22s 0,1,. Cinque Foin - -45 s ad to Tr63,od per qr. Trefoil • - -s /Os t') 32s Od per cwt. Cauary iGas ad Co 180 S Od per gr.. Oil rake at the Mill, 181. 18$ - . per thousand. NEWGATE AND LEADENI-TALI. MARK:ETS. • By tbe.Carcase. Beef 4s Od to 5s , 9.d I Veal .ss Od to 6s Bd. Mutton ss 4(1 to 6s 4d 1 Pork 6s Od to is 0,1 Lamb, Bi. C . d. to 73. od PRICE OF LEAMER. Butts; 50 to 5613)s each.. , . per lb d to 2541 Ditto, sfi to cioh . , VW to 2:4d Merchants' Backs 2ld to 22.111 , . Dressing Hides - :20Id to 2J .id Fine. Coach Hides 2‘t to 23d Crop Hides; 36 to 4016 s for cutting , 2o id to 2lld Ditt0..'.....: 46 to 301bs ~,. „ .. '2lid to 231 d Calf *as,. 30 hi 40Ibs ' .34d to 39d Ditto - i 50 to 70165 3Bd - ta'4ld . . Ditto .70 to 80113 s • ;364 to 40d ' Sloan Seals (Greenland; Large ditto . per dozen,. Tanned Horse HidL -, ,td, to 4. , 7d O Goat Skins per dozen s to'w..)s RAW I i11)E S. _.„.. . Best Heifers ex. Steers, per g. ordittary.....ls Iod to 2s Od 2s Btl to ai Od Aarfiet Calf .. each .. 12s Middlings ...2s 4d to 2s ea Et. 4. Hot•se . 14s' 'Od to 18s Q Laub Skins, Rs. Ud. to Ss: (id. t. - • . Sheep SLitts;" 181. PRICE OF S t.James's Market ... Si OA Clare, 'Market O,, od Whitechapel Market' 3s OA . per stone of 816. -------.• TALLOW. Tallbtk. 86s - Od —0 (Id y t thAvjilussia 8.55:0d —=s Od White ditto —s Od -s Od Soa• ! , ditto.. 78s •Oil —s Od Stuff Ids Od Ditto Rough . : —405 - Od —s Oul Graves • iOs c! Average 28s Od Good bregi. '12 . 5 Od Yellow Soap .... 98:, A I lotticl ' 110 A Price of Candles, liter oi.,zen, Gdycr dozen :tliovv'e Curd .... llO —9 14$ '6d - 4 —,Moulds; 165 od rd for reak money. . ST. JAMES'! HAY, M.A.R.KET, Har •:31 '35 .od to 51 IS; od---=—Averag,c, 41 . As pd Straw • IvlirtT.er--mpEt, AIARKET. Ha}.... . . 41 his oil to GI Os ciii--Average, 51 5s Od Stra , ,V. c)l t; 00 'to 21 1 .f.; ()(I—=—Ave.brage, 21 •9s Od CIOVer GI Igs Od to 71 12s Od-- 7 .1.vt . :rage,,71 Is ed 8:Vi' . 11.3) . A) . ( ; , 'GA7.E'I"IIt--(Contipu,ed..), • DMDINOS. w. Atchis,on, Neitate-street,' .Ing. 20. ,'1„ Wei lings„ ClJurch-lane, Whitechapel, pitinter— Aog. 22. troston, Lancashire, linen-draper-- .:‘117:. Stove . rby, New Bond-Street, milliner-- . -Aug: 30. J. 3ohnsott, .bufy Saint Edmunds, Sufi:6lk ? ,boot-quaker--,- Aug. 20. 'J. CalvCr, Brook-trizt, Ratcliff, victualler—Ang. G. Seddon, .vflersgate-street, cabinet-maker—Aug.. 25. J. Mims, Carl'. Hill, Yorkshire, cottOP4piriner—Atilt. SO. J. 'Townsend, 'Cian't . ,conrt Fleet -st reet,. upholsterer.-L--Aug. J. Tills, Pcnelnirch-street, wine-merchant—Auq . . 25. J. Hartley, Kendal, - Westmorlada, shoemaker—Aug. Qa. W. msstrit,t, WurcesterShire, Inealman---,Ang. SO. J . . Thomas, Wt.l.hpool, - Montgomeryshire, woolleti-manpfac tu'rer—Aug. .22. S. Gosling . , Bramkßll, Cheshire, muslin manufacturer:—Aug. 20. 'C. Knill, Holm Lacy, Hereford shire, farmer Aug. 20. J. Balfour Brisinghall-street, Black well Hall-factor—Aug.,. 20. Greenstreet, Citmberwell, wbeelwright—lng. 22. - J. tlioadlq, Pigs Lee, Lancashire,: dyer. • CERTIFICATES=—At , 6. 20. T. nagger, Watling-street, butcher—d. Hughes, late of Brightlielinstone, -poulterer—.T. Chahipiun, Great ,St.. He leu s, broker—G. Twiddy, Bread-street hill, ulourpiaii-11. Cullen and .I,3'ears, late of Cheapside, factors—J. Dave n port, .Htiggi ri-rane, Silk-martufacturer--S. Davis, Bradford, clothier. ' PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. . - T. Burrow and T. Mason, Lancaster, tutreharits—R. Rci• binson and 'T. Barrow, Lancaster, cotton-spinners- - -.J.l;futton mid W. - Moss, Lii'erpool, ironmongers -3. and IV: Jackson, Canterbury, brush-maker:—R.' WCild and W. W. Chevely, Gerrard-street, Soho, attornies—W. Jackson and F. Macklin, Yiettield, carriersl - 1. and J. Rhodes, Little Goinersall,. York , hire, winAstaplers-3. N. Bacon add T.'Sotton, Saint grocers—N.'Weiton and J. Haigh, BIM-in-hand court, chrap..4l,, 'schoolmasters- 1 -G. and J Cooper, Walton upotilima,„ brewerS—E,,'Stanip, sen. and J.L. Scott, (I.ln wick, N spirit-inereliadts—M. ins:: J. Ste vet) mit , Rich in Aid; vont -dealers —!). Re in:herand C. Grellet, Loniton, - 'coal-merchants—K,, and Lewis, •Tewhesbury, hosiery mantifactmw,s—E. and T. J. Golding, 01d City Chain- CotvineSt, G. Osborn, W. Higgins, .and J: Godfrey, of Chat !ilin,,almtb , caries-4... Fav 111(1 M..Cotfsins, of. Ash- Inirnham 11mise, Bla,lateath, ,sclunil-mistrc,s--.1. Powell T.,Eniviryoif: Bath, Nv i 114 b n ts—W. PaVtie and I'. ?,lorshead, of Aiderinanhdy—E. Kinsford, F. Niehokon, J. F-11 and T. Hope, of Sandwich. Kent—W. i . t . l N. P. Abraham, of Privett, Southampton, giirdeliers---T. - Bushby and R. Parker, of SuSsex, hankers=--T. Worsick and .1. Seholefeield, M uSbury. La neyshire, cotton-spinners S. Sehorlield arid, .S..Sehorfield, jun. of Sontlinwroin, 01;14, in the stone business—J. Short, sen. and J. Shrift, jitn;. Newgate-street, tea-defilers—D. Hagne and 'l'. HO% Bristol, masoo-12... Hug - lies, it, Rimmer, J. and 1). Hughes, Llan saint-fruit!, North Wales, corn-factors---W: Hand find S. Ben nett, Worcester, - tavlors—E. Baker and R. Cattle;;, South- . ampton - , merchants—T. Hediey, 'l'. Dixon, and 1,1. Newsustle-upon-Tyne, millers. - , . , . LONDON RETURN OF WHEAT IN . MARK-LANI , I, Iry Messrs. (Abu/ and NIALI.tg, Ntlal-Weighers, . . Inclu - thug only frotn July 18 to .luls , :2:3. •22 Quarters at 13.15,04 . 1 470 Quarters-At -71504 7 ----- at' 83s 041' , 463 ,---- at 70s Oil 35 —,---- at • 82s Od .- 1W -------. at 69s 04 1.41 --,-----,- at 81s 04 691 —...-- at 68s•Od 461 --:--; at ' SOs-Od 2811 ...---,--, at 67s 04 9,34 - At 66s Od 37 •at 77s 04 s ------ at .6550"4. 473 ----.- at 76s Od• 1 78' at 64s 04 49u ---..-- at 75s 04 I 1372 - C3s 04 .539 --- at 74s od ) 255' "at 62s (id 293" - at - 73 s od I 401) ---:- 7 - at 60s 9:1 IC7 -- at 72s Oa 1 4.r And 144 quarters At 535. per quarter. Total 8764 Quarters.--Aserage 70(. id. 34. 34(1. higher tlian last Return. A - RE'I.I3IIN OF FLOUR, • From July 10, to July 22.—From the Docket ()thee. Sacks. s. s. d. Saclis.• • s. d. 91 70 0 903 —62 Q 193 57 0 20 69 0 66,--- 61 0 • 25 -- 5G 0 14985 --- 65 0 1 846 , 7 , 7- 60 0 - 20 —7 55 6 452 64 0 'B2 ---, 59 , 0 1 15 55' 0 1423 63'0 257 - 7 -"- 5 . 8 0 10 -- 54 0 153-- 62 6 • 50 —57 t 5-- 32 0 And to Sack: at 5,0 i. per Total-29,00 Sacks.—Averoge, Os. id. lower than last w 635. 114t1. UXBRI DG.E. COrn-Irtg [lector's iteturn.-Tlitirsday,' .Inly QS. Wht.. per 161 Os to .211 0; - i Beans 4(is t 1 to 48s (3d Barley, per gr.33s Od to sod Rye —s Od Oats PRICE F HOPS. New Bags.: - • - ' • • New Pockets. Kent 5l os.to 71 17s Kept.... . til Os to 91 9s Suslex:— 51 Os to 71 Os 81.15§.... .51 12s to SI OA Essex 61. Os to 71 7s •FarahalH.. .91 .0s to Mt Os Old Duty la; 15fu,e0(i1.• •i.Aw INTErA,I(3Ecs. • • 'COURT OF.CHANCERY; ALTO. 1 . CONTEMPT. , . .MORANn v..SirCEIETT• • TI '••• -rang coot eted 'nfotibti -came 110's fl"- final decision.'after elaborate arginnents fro,"'fro Hart, Mr. Leach, mid Mr. Wiugficl•d, o'l4, Sir Samuel liOinflly, supported by gr. 11°1 the part of the defendant. • Sir - S. ROMILLY having tliis morning reply on behalf 4: -. )f the defendant, who aP' , - : ‘ fi' be discharged wit of custody, front an onlu:i ,'t• trainer by execution against hini Of a- s°;.t tachment fOr contempt, iii not onssvcr''''' plaintiff's bill. • „L;oic i , l l, s , T ne CHANCELLOR., giviog detailed the Merits of the case sb circuni6o3oir as,to prechlde the mcCssity pi giviog bid? inents •Of Counsel on either side. His lA r ° ( 1 ,0 4 " stated, th 4 the defendant, having beeo 3 eje Der with the plaintiff, a London. indrchant ..1,1. tensive trade, and conditeted the busin e ' s ,,,.th eC i firm at Frankfort, on the Continent, "'b e file"' had a house for years. That a bin - had becil ; " r by the plaintiff against the defendant, 3"`114,,;10' der obtained' forubstitutiii . r . s'ervirc of I` :. ' to ansWerlhe 'Same' on the defendants Sy..ctiloo fhis country.. On the defendant's 11-1-ival tell qz, the process to an attachment was entere"l:roir il4l in finir days only of eNecutiOn,',,rer on the plalntiff proposedto him to offurson'er al of aecommodation or the Matters ill cillat'vt-it out putting the attachment into executi".' appeared- from the a ffirla 6ts ' t hat 1 165 , 1 : 1( :i '' ct was fallacious, and calcialated to Pm dant off his . guard from Within c ogc"' 'days, such ail answer, as would . bar. ' •,r dr, went, tmtil this Cburt. -could be inove t ', l( vr t li r' ime, to answer fully. • Instead of replY l ' 7 ' l ,t defendant's proposal, it w „;. c h ar ged '' ► '', o );"' plaintiff, through a third person, wil" t t ill lr no affidavit, had deluded th 6 defewlio' t ,clo' time was out, and the writ of aitachow";lol,ll executed. This practice could not lie a COIIII of Justice. • The attachment Iv°' ' • to be discharged, Vvith costs_ LADY DEMOND and OTHERS ?I. titiT cti r • In this cause, a bill was tiled by h er who . was daughter of the late Lord " r i 3ll l 4 ' ill f against the .defendant,who NtiilS h iS solicitor and steward, for an account, 0.,;-I,o'lliir,-; r bt put in possessicin of certain lands in ' s ` die '„, under the, following- circumstances 1'?73, Lord Wandesford, who then re sitlei r ol land, Was prevailed on by the dcietolaat t ' fo r ' t lands in Yorkshire to a Mr. IZal ‘ l -' 64e.e ' lll° io cs years, at the annual rent of 9001. sslg3c "I':it r. immediately after Wards g o t.' an a i". Mr. Lodge of his ltaie, and aftero-:ar.,.' 10' . IVandesford.gave hint'a lease in rev ersi"" t , year;, at the expiration of . tive lease (()Ift‘ot°,'lvE the same annual rent ; but if the tiefeu,'„,etl.,ii, - lived the expiration of the reve rsionary . then :Should have possession of the rt, his.lifetinte at t c same rent. oP I .1!; Sir SAMI/El. iltomiLLY, Mr. .LnA'T', 00, :l a WINKEIELD, 01111 former day contend e d , lig o • defendant,-.. as a, SOlicit.or and Stcp'• " rll ' right to have received such .a grant foi'lidiell'ist ployers, particularly as Ills. LordshiP , ‘,o; gist Of grant ilts was of a- very adva o cea ' T !r- . 5 a Court of, Equity - always th o ug ht o public` policy, to look at at such ea se 4 ,• r tinisiug eye. tinder these consicterBlll;ye trusted his Lordship would gr.-I . 'it the I Air. .the Bill, • Sir, ARTHUR PLOGOTT, Mr. I { '' ier : ' /10 1 . 1( Ce" FIE.4-.1), Counsel for the defendant, t 1 " 5 , 0 0 ,1 ',', 1 ,e tended that this,was a fai • r and boitc/fidetr3t.-ater•ltLii.: and 'one that a Court of Equity could ' l° l l l oo o ot in. It hail not been.attempted.to be 111e . .`% e „ , 10'( 1 tlefenclant, who.was then 96 years of .34. -' 0 1 1111 •0' regttlarly paid his rent—it was not de il e t th e t ic part that it was .not profitable !Lase' i a t of trary it wits ackno‘rledged to be sucl;',' C/ 0111" :.er w4s,' fOr :past services. 11 13 '•(or Equity prevent a master from rew:ll(`',),-")lid'.to vanC% it it; did,: it wOnld not. be pailli c itould do - aay ; with all stimulu s f°l‘.‘;;;ll(le4c° w w 0 14 be,faithful to their emplOvers: 1 ,01(1 lived 8 y ek4 .s after t . • at arY revesl , be . e 0 signed, and expressed himself tented ; so far from it, its-Le‘Vetl,.°'-' the lease, that it was hisintention ji;' .an old servant as long as lie livx considerations they hoped his fic'' l° ' °. -miss the Bill. I Sir SAMUELROMILLY was partly- .ply.—Further argument postp • BIRTHS. .5 41. A 's' On the 28th ult. the Lady of Waiter Park, Ireland, of 'a son. - • f;ref ti fill'['Lll On the 29th ult, at the,Bisho \ p of ; "' ' 7 l ' c) ' street, I)uhlin, Mri. Zllolt ' “tw - tr•th St e nt - uf t.c ' On the :10th ult. in Bernar;l:str - eet . of 'Elpraits Wyatt,. Esq. of swrand heir; I, * •IdY A few days since, at l'ijato . Uth UocL, the Carden, of the Navy, of a daugl;ler• % :120,0 0 :: i ti t t, rl., l lo ;: ei,ne2:l l ,), s .t.Lf t hte i tv.:ti n ,,l s i ts t e.h . , i a tilt, t .:iisi l. :ti e l.i ;l ti l l: • i ii i . r :: l ::, s l:l , ll l l . ) i n t, .;;; l l I rii : : : :: i : 1 ; 1 1 :: : r ;,: v. ; of BLickheath-road, t, ,''lltit'l.:a, younge.it .d 31 : 1 . : ), Lie ~;l ii ; : i c • 0,- ~• t o e f r t ( 1 . 1 ,t e . t h ii : i t o e n v. : r \v . i i i i i :: 1 ,.. of ova ctY.: t 4 1 3efil l f :i' t14. Thomas Bernard, inn E:': AI. P. of L' ; ' s "" e ' e coa - it t ilturdai , llst at land; to I'd . • c Ilea - • • • i; i , ui ti t .I,inion, 5 J,}ot, !SS C. rietta ,- I! 1 .T - .`" • ~, r 11, ,,•V - On ' . , 9 - . ... w re. Turner, Esq.. af Bedford-row, to Mary-JOet4 . , o f t , of Mrs. Clark, of liitt,ham Fe,i refs. l 'A, 1 - I'Y' s'°''' ' ' o cl‘ . Tlic•same clay ; at Lambeth, Mr. Jolin •:' ' cra t o) Coiffior Ofliev,•to Miss Dely, of INlewirgt"°:,,,:rsbil:e'e, of v.l.tukchiins„oci.i; c.. • iroch, Li10ci3•°i.,,a,.,,1•„.4 A few. flays since, at•oidsurtifOrd, iVor",;,.;. l'fl c r to , e , to ,'' Illilf,,rd, Esq.. Banke r ., of Sto• Al uili.,., , . Heath. • • • - Ikia';3art. 111.1 ) 111E1 , • , „ I d o l), .- . ~.4 r • On the-23d tiq • .0n the 29th tilt "r 3(.lf'tst. rail, only f .?t, , l T iis residence dear 1...' tbet th , f,; 4 , rem, ... at th . house, o f N. i •• . ~. Geo rge „t il aining• iket.,•liter of the hill• ~t tow ' of Lancaster,' ~_l . . uized 64. „kproP, ' i s tin he IWc II lilt. at I.lw:field, N'ev,' 1...a11ar1.`,!',,,,,vc• . ~,, t ett ., , , ti!i(u)'"::',t1;11.10f the late David o.lle, f. , (1. of ttl';`..t-re f"!':10'1 on, Aat , -,r(liv ti'panish_4l:cl:•2',tt t Ito li wise of 1N1r5.,i,3030. V.at,,,Jl , . ci , f ag ,,,i 27. 1 ,-11 11.inCht:SICr-,q11,41e, +" , ' cis insill' • Oil Friday morniro• at his hon . 9e atlliclOo tier" ~,Jir E 0 ward Da;•ell, Esc. '''-'I,ed 86 . i JolW I ' ' ' . "e I/ goo, of' Chef , sva. last :firs. Leeds, wit'col N J. ' 13.5•' -Vestei•dii7, in sackfille-itrert, i be Ite v. J° l Arelikaeoi3 of Surrey, aged 74. , .0! ; I ' o ' C td o • • No. ift "4( . WNDON: Printed, J. 11. buil'llm:s; and puidi;hed hySCh'27, . at the guy-OFFIcg, No. I.le, Strand : - `‘; i t b t , ; Oa` !D ents, Orders, Letturs (post-paid), &C• '9°