The Sun. — London, England, 1850-07-08 00:00:00

rtirb Iritition SUN OFFICE, Seven o' Clock. HEALTH OF HIS ROYAL HIGH- NESS THE DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE. A rumour was abroad this afternoon in the City of the decease of his Royal Highness the Duke of Cambridge. It was reported that his Royal Highness had expired in the course of the afternoon. We are happy to find, however, that the rumour is entirely uufuunded. On inquiring at Cambridge House, at six o'clock this evening, our reporter was informed that his Royal Highness was considerably better. TATTERSALL 'S-THIS EVENING. Six o'CLocis. LIVERPOOL CUP. 4 to 1 apt Winchbegratz 4 to 1 CI gst Cockermouch 4 to 1 agst Mail of Team Valley 8 to 1 nit Vampyre 10 to 1 agst Juggler GOODWOOD STAKES. 9 to 1 agst B , rneo 15 to 1 agst Glen Saddel 15 to 1 agst Linivon 20 to 1 agst Sauter la coupe 20 to 1 agst St. Rosalia, GOODWOOD CUP. .5 to 1 f4g-t Cosback 6 to l +4 ,,,, t (Thantieleer IMPERIAL PARLI A MENT, (THIS EVENING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. Their Lordships met at Five o'clock. The Bishop of LONDON presented petitions against the relay system. The Duke of RICHMOND presented petitions to the same effect. The Earl of HARDWICKE presented petitions to the same effect. POST-OFFICE SUNDAY DELIVERY. Lord HATHERTON presented several petitions, praying for the restoration of the Post-office delivery on Sundays. The Noble Lord earnestly supported the prayer of the petition, and he trusted that those who were entrusted with legislative duties would have the courage to express their opintons, and would not be ab sent from their post when the matter should again come under consideration. Lord BROUGHAM concurred in the wish expressed by his Noble Friend. He believed that the stoppage of the Pus•-office Sunday delivery tended to the desecration of the Sabbath, inasmuch as instead of twenty or thirty Post-office officials b-ing employed for a few hours on Sunday, from 200 to 300 persons were employed the whole of Sunday. I; so happened that in a most important trial that was to come on Monday a paper was wanted—it could not be transmitted by post, and, therefore, the parties had to dtspa•ch special messengers, who were emp!oyed the whole of Sunday. The B sr.op of LONDON said that ►he petitions against Post-office Oanday labour were signed by the bankers and merchants of London, and by the great majority of the middle daises. Lord KINNAIRD believed that a great majority of those employed in the large towns, particularly mer chants and manuLclurers, were in favour of the abolition of the Post-office delivery 'on Sundays ; he 'hoped time would b- taken to consider whether this measure could net be carried out without inconvenience. Lord LY fTELTON complained that the Govern ment had taken no means to carry out the measure ,without inconvenience. Why should London have the monopoly of re,t on Sunday ? The Earl of MALMESBURY hoped they would be in no hurry to consent to the abolition of the Sunday delivery. The bankers and merchants were the persons least interested in the matter; they had the means of ob taining intelligence, but it was the small trader and the inhabitant of the rural district mho was inconvenienced by ir. The Bishop of OXFORD protested against discussing this matter by chance. his &jection to the Post-office Sunday delivery was the number of persons it set to work on Sundays. A solicitor might receive a letter on Sunday which would make him bound to set his clerks to work on Sunday. They were bound to protect them who wished to spend the Sunday aright. He would not stop the railroad on Sundays, but he would stop the Post-office Sund ay delivery.- Lord CAWBELL protested against the law of the the Right Rev. Prelate. The Right Rev. Prelata said that if a solicitor read a letter, he was to set his clerks to work omnibus aiiis negotiis omissis, and prepare a brief under form of writ. Such aves not the law. If he found it related to John Doe and Rict and Roe, be would throw it aside until Monday morning. If it related to the illness of a near relation, he would at once set off to see him. He bad be n brought up in Scotland, and he revered the Sabbith, but he believed that such measures as those recently adopted tended to its desecration, and he depre cated their ad,ption. The Duke at G IZAFTON wan in favour of the aboli tion of the Pus' . -officeSenday delivery. PETITIONS. Lord BROUGHANI presented a petition from Mrs. Ge.irgiana Hall, praying tur a divorce. She had married a person named Hall andestinely, but the marriage had never teen coi.ummated. Her husnand had sub quently marrie , l another person in Fran , ;e. She had obiaineti a divorce a mens a et thoro, and she now prayed for a divorce. Lord MONTEAGLE presented a petition against the M,tropolitan Int-tm nts Bill. The Earl of LONSDALE presented a petition from Dover in favour of the Public Health Bill. The Doke of WELLING roN believed that the ma• jority cf the inhabitants of Dover were in favour of the Bill. Esrl GREY presented a petition from the Town Council of Newcastle. in favour of the immediate rescinding of the order prohibiting Post-office Sunday deliveries. The Duke of RICHMOND presented a petition from Todmorde:i in tavour of a red Ten Hiiurs Act. Lord BitOLTG HAM t . a i felt it his duty to oppose the original Bill as a mi.chievous interference between the employer and the employed, but he would not take uny unfair advAntege, and he thought it would be most un just not to correct the inadvertent slip which had been made. HEAL OF TOWNS BILL. On the order of the day for OA committal of this Bill, The Esrl of LONSDALE moved that the Bill be re ftrred to a Select And was (LEFT SPEAKING.) HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER tQuk the Ceair to-Jay shortly after Twelve O%A° .k. The I, , ,rds' 4mPndmPnts to the following prirate Bills were c ,, nsider d And a,v,ret , d to : The Grea. Northern Itzil way (D-viattons, Amendment of Acv, Aleratton of Tolb, and of East Lincolnshire Railway The Waterford ald _TC_lll , ...pnny Railway. THIRD READINGS. The Nlowing Bill 3 wcre rea t a third time and pass d:— The Birkenhead D .ek Trus ees Bill. The River Dee Cons-rvsney and Improvement Bill. The Westminster Impn,v• ment Sir Peter II sketh Fleetwood's E3tite Bill, as amended, was sgrt.e.i PETITIONS. Sir J. Y. BULLER. preteltrd petitions from places in Devonshire for and against the recent alterations in the Post-office; also petitions against the Jr Several petitions against the Jews Bill were pre sented from various parts of the country. Mr. FULLER present-A d petition from a place in Essex in favour of the recent postal arrsrigements. Mr. FORSTER presented petitions from places in Essex against the recent altrrat'ons in the Post-office. The Hon. Member also gave no ice t.f hie intention, to morrow, to present a petition from Lloyd's against the blereaniile Marine Bill Mr. CLAY presented a petition from the Chamber of Commerce of Hull against the Mercantile Marine Bill. Lord MELGUN I) presented a petition from Grtenuck in favour of ;h•• Mercantile Marine 13111. Mr. GROGAN prea-nted a petition fiom the Cham ber of Commerce of Dublin iu favour of the Home made Spirit , in Bond B Mr. k ORS f ER, in presenting petitions from Royst on and from Witham the non-transmission of letters ou Sundays, gave riotit!e that to•morrow he should pre sent a petition from the underwriters of Lloyd's to the same t Ect. MERCANTILE MARINE BILL. On the motion that the Svaker do :Pate the chair for the purpose or the House going into Curomitve on the Mercantile Maria. Bill, Mr. MOFFA CT, puit-ittant to notice, moved as an amendment, thst the House should resolve itself into Commiit-e on the Bill that day six months. As a mercantile man, he was bound to say that the measure was viewed with greet suspicion out of doors, and it was thought by mercantile teen that they had been unfairly dealt with by her Majesty's Government. For his own part he thought the Bill unfair and prejudicial to the shipping interest. He thought that that interest was entitled to expect after the passing ot the Naviga tion-laws &Teal Bill, tint some relief would be given to them with respect to the restrictions relative to pilotage, and that they had also reason to complain of the regula tions with respect to maening the navy, which restricted them in the mode ot mannirg their ships, and plic2ed them in a most disadvantsgous position as regarded competition with foreigners.—(Hear, hear.) If this Bill should become law it wound, insteal of ac complishirg the objects pr,,tansed, give rise to greater annoyances end vex.tions than existed under the present system. The whole machinery by which it was to be carried into effect wss Very detective. and he believed had been proposed by the Government on the faith of One-sided intormation. He doubted very much the pro priety of throwing so much responsibility on the Board of ,'Trade as at present c:instituted. He did not dis co:4er throughout the whole Bill a clause which was more calculated to diminish the evils ot the crimping system than the existing law, Lie cbaractfrised the Bill as amounting, in fast, to an i nd i ctment against the shipowners of the kingdom, fur it seemed to be taken for granted throughout every °Anse that they were ratttli of frau iu riot pa) irg the wages of their seamen. No mention h.d yet been made ot the exp a n se which the Mann WOled tatail oa >rhe AiPPLDS liwatot, - Lvcal boards of examinatior, and shipmasters with a number of clerks, would have to be appointed at different ports, and all the expense of maintaining such a staff of offi cials would hare to be bort eby the shipowners. A new system of taxation was to be introduced by the Bill, and this without the consent ef the shipowners, who were to be mulcted of a large sum of money for the purpose of carrying it out. They said, if Par liament wished to pass the Bill, that the expense of it ought to be bone by the Consolidated Fund. The port cf London was partially opposed to the Bill, but it was wholly and entirely opposed by the ports of Hull, Bristol, Dublin, Dundee, Plymouth, Scarborough, North Shields, Carnarvon, Plymouth, and other ports. The shipping interest protested loudly against the Bill, which they said had been passed without a full and fair inquiry into the merits of the case, and without their sanction and concurrence, which they be lieved was directly opposed to their best interests. Sir W. CLAY said it was not his intention to trespass at any length on the attention of the House, but as he had the honour to represent a borough which consti tuted one of the largest ports in the kingdom, it might naturally be expected that he ought not to give a silent vote on an important measure of thi, nature. He did not agree with the Hon. Gentleman that the Bill was very unpopular among the shipping interest. Though he could not deny that a large por tion of the shipowners in Hull were adverse to the Bill, but their objections were not so strong or universal as stated by the Hon. Gentleman. The majority of the inhabitants of that borough was largely interested in the prosperity of the mercantile interest, and if he thought the present Bill was hestile to that interest no private consideration would induce him to give it his support; but, on the contrary, be be lieved that it would be absolutely impossible to bring forward any measure which would have a more lesne ficial effect than the oee now before the H .use. The question for the House to consider was, whether the character of the captains and other officers of the British mercantile navy was such as to elevate the character of the first commercial country in the world—whether they were fit men to bo entrusted with millions of property and hundreds of thousands of lives? Now it was quite notorious that these officers were not men in whom such confidence ought to be reposed. He contende 1 that the consular returns showed that the professional character of the masters and captains of our mercantile marine was by no means of that effi cient order which was absolutely necessary, considering the great amount of property and the number of lives entrusted to their care. That was owing, first, to the great extent of our colonial system, which was carried on under such peculiar circumstances as to preclude a high order io merit among commanders of our mercantile marine; secondly, to the enormous extent during the war of what was called the trans e. t service, which engaged many hundreds of tons of sh p ping; and, thirdly, to the circumstance that most of that service was carried on by convoys, the speed of which was regulated, not by the best sailing ship and the best informed master, but by the worst sailing ship, commanded by the best informed master. He supported the Bill because he saw in it the means of raising the character of the offi cers in our mercantile marine. He thought also that the provisions of the Bill were well adapted to protect the British :alter, for there could not be a more helpless or friendless creature than a sailor arriving at a strange port. The Bill ale, came recommended to his mind because it provided a tribunal of law for settling disputes between masters and sailors. For those reasons, and because he believed that the measure was essentially necessary, not only for the country at large, but especi ally for the shipping interest itself, he would give the Bill his meet cordial support.—(Hear, hear.) Mr. CLAY thought the House was legislating on a great subject in a very small way. The Bill as it now stood was greatly altered and improved since it first came under the consideration of the House ; but although many of those alterations had had the effect of conciliating much of the opposition with which the Bill was at first assailed, yet it was not wholly unobjectionable to him. He was at a loss to know why the coasting trade was to be left out of the Bill altogether. He cordially agreed in that provision of the Bill which provided for an examination of masters and mates; but there was a second principle in the Bill, namely, that which proposed an interference between shipowners and their sailor', v.ith a view to the protec tion of the latter, in which he could not concur, because it was always in the highest degree dangerous and in convenient to intervene between a master and his servant. A clause introduced into the Act obliging a certain por tion of his wages being detained immediately upon ar riving in port, would obviate a great many evils which resulted from his reckless character. With regard to the Bill, he should have been much more inclined to refer it to a Select Committee, because he did not feel that hostility to the entire Bill as was professed by some Hon. Members. He thought there was great need of a geaeral consideration of this subject, and he thought that nothing could be done without long and careful inquiry; but as it was, he should certainly vote against the second reading. Lord JOHN MANNERS had originally intended to have moved to refer this Bill to a Select Committee, but his opinion had undergone considerable modification in consequence of the alterations which had been intro duced by the Right Honourable Gentleman. Still there were many matters of detail conneded with the measure which would be much better discussed in a Committee than in the walls of the House of Commons. The appointment, and the constitution, and the working of the local boards of examination were matters of this sort. He was not himself disposed to attach much im portance to the statement of the consuls which had been read to the House, because of course their reports would be in accordance with the wishes of their Government; neither was there much force in the fact that during the time of war merchant captains were most frequently under the c , ntrol and direction of men of war captains convoying them, because he thought that in 30 3 ears of peace a Lew generation had arisen who were certainly bet ter qualified. If Hon. Members were still desirous that the Bill should be referred to a Select Committee, he was quite prepared to propose the amendment of which he had given notice. Mr. LABOUCHERE was not disposed to quarrel with the objections which had been raised by Hon. Memeers against the principle of the Bill, and he was quite ready to defend it upon the present occasion. It baJ been said that this Bill was opposed to the wishe, of the shipp , ng interest, but he could assert with confidence that such was net the case. The shipowners of Liverpool, Bristol, and Glasgow, were warm supporters of the Bill in its principle, and even in many instanc, s of its details. The shipowners of Lon don were certaqily divich d in their opinions, but he thought it was a remarkable fact that a Bill contem plating such great alterations should have met with so little opposition. Having named constituencies so powerful, he could name individuals without number, but he would only select two from a mass, and those should be two of the largest ship owners in the world, most excellent men, and celebrated ter their efforts on behalf of the sailor—he meant Mr. Gilmour, of Glasgow, and Mr. Green, of London. He complains d ef the extraneous points which had been in troduced into the di-cussion, and the Honourable Memeer fur Hull, fur instance, had ta'ked of some tnete-ure which had been introduced respect ing lightteg does. Why, the measure which had bs en introduced by the Government had had the effect of reducing the lighting (lure exactly one- ball, a boon which was thankfully re:eived by the whole coasting trade. He admitted thst the Bill was in some degree a Bill of interference, but he would just point out the objects of the contemplated interference. There were three great objects embraced by this Bill— first, to provide for the examination before competent authorities of mariners before they were allowed to take the command of ships; secondly, to deoprive every cap tain of his certificate who should in any way misconduct himself. He denied that he had made a charge against the masters in the merchant service of wholesale in cspacity ; but he did say that great and gross abuses exisu d in the service, which this Bill was in tended to cheek. The next part of the Bill bad given rise to mere diff!recc4 of opinion; it related to the es tablishment of recognised shipping officers, and he urged that principle upon the House because he believed it would not only pi otect the hard-working sailor from fraud, but also confer large benefits upon the employer. No doubt it would give rise to expense; but was the present system carried on without expense? Certainly not. The merchant and owner had to pay large sums to licensed shipping agents. and all he proposed to do by this part of the Bill was to establish a uniform rata of fie s to be paid to properly qualified and public agents, whose appointment should be entrusted to the Crown. The fee to be paid on the shipment of each sailor would be 2s. In America it was a dollar, while in Quo ls,c the lee was 5,., and he therefore thought the tee he bad fixed upon t and proper discipline in the extravagant. The last object of the Bill wasw . s not , intended to secure strict extremely ds fective, tending, as i presenthant theservice. discipline N waso t did, to encourage de sertion on the p a rt o f the sailors, and jeopardi s e the theroefey d fo ship, his part of the B p r i o i a p , e t r h t e y n ot p t r h o e ownervideda remedy state of things, i s b i e o nso f and when they got into Committee heshould pre pared to still further justify th e d eta il s and prov the measure. Without, therefore, troubling tberHouse fur ther on the Bill itself, he would pass t o th e ques tionwlac had been raised iu the course of this deb ate of consoli dating all the Acts that composed the merchant law of this country. Now that was at the present moment an im possibility; but pass this Bill, and be would undertake to lay on the table, or extensively promulgate, a Bill for consolidating all the laws. It would be his aim to endeavour t,.) amend and consolidate the law at the same time, but until this mea-ure had been fairly tested it would be impossible to accomplish either, obeyeeoxrPethrieneocjier. In the early part of this discnssion some obj.ction was taken to the Bill, on the ground that it would confer a large additional amount of patronage. Now he bad amended that part of the measure, and as it now stood the appointments to be made under the Bill would be vested in local authorities. He therefore hoped, now that all objections had been met, no more time would be lint in passing this Bill, which could not do otherwise than confer large benefits upon the shipping interest of this country. Mr. HERMES said it was a mistake to suppose that the opposition was averse to the principle of the Bill, for no, side of the House, no party could object to a measure which had tor its aim the improvement of the mercantile merine of this country; but the question was, did this Bill attain that end? He, for one, cer tainly did not think it did, nor did he believe thst the majority of the shipping interest entertained a favourable opinion towards the measure. No doubt some ports did approve of it, but by no means all, or even a fair . proportion of them. The great objection which he entertained to the Bill bad refererce to what look place last session. When the navigation-laws were repealed the Government pro raised to relive the ohipptvg isttereDt of s ou buNess which pressed upon them, and which prevented them en tering into an unrestricted competition with the foreigner, but by this Bill they imposed still more onerous condi tions on that interest. The measure involved so many conflicting questions, and would give rise to such im portant consequences, that he would suggest that ample time should be given to those who would be affected by it, to consider the propriety of passing such a measure before it became law. There was no pressing urgency for legislation on the subject, and though he did not object to the House going into Committee, with the view of considering the provisions of the Bill, he thought it would be much better to delay proceeding with it further this session. —(Hear, hear.) Let them make the Bill as perfect as they could by deliberations in the House, and then give ample time, as he apprehended they must, to the shipping interests to consider its pro visions, and if they did so, he considered they would have a much better measure than the one now before the House. Mr. CARDWELL said, the question for the House to decide was whether they should or should not pass the Bill in its present state this session. He was one who should give his decided support to the measure, which he s.td had been very much altered since it was first introduced last session. Although he enter tained strong opinions on several subjects which had b -en excluded from the Bill, yet he would give the motion for going into Committee his sup port, being anxious that all useful and im port int measures should be passed this session, and reserve to himself the right of making such alterations as he thought necessary in Committee. Mr. M ACGREGOR supported the Bill, observing that if a Bid of this kind had been passed 50 years ago half cf the shipwrecks and property, and lives, which had been lost during that period by the neglect or in competence of stamen, would have been saved to the country'. Mr. MOFFAT r withdrew his amendment. The Hothe then divided, when there appeared— For the amendment of Lord Jubn Manners, far referring the B►ll to a Select Committee 34 Against it Majority The amendment was consequently 104 t. Mr. WAWA objected to the restrictions contained in the Bill as vexatiou', and expressed his deep regret that the Government by this Bill had held out no expectation to the British shipowner that he would be placed in a condition in which he should be enabled to compete with the foreign shipowner. The House then went into Committee pro Jorma on the Bill. ...... _____ The House resumed, the Chairman reported progress, and the House obtained leave to sit again to-morrow at twelve. _ __ _ _ . . The House then adjourned until Five o'clock. The House resumed at Five o'clock. Mr. THORNELY brought up the Report of the Committee on Public Petitions. PE FI PIONS. Mr. GLYN presented petitions from various places against the Marriage Bill. Mr WALPOLE presented petitions from Lewes and other places in Sussex in favour of the recent alterations in the Post. office. _ _ _ Mr. GASKELL presented a petition against the Jews Bill. The Hon. Member stated that he did not concur in the prayer of the petition. Mr. PLUMP rRE presented petitions in favour of the rcent alterations in the Post-office. Mr. P. WOOD presented petitions from attorneys and solicitors in various parts of Lancashire in favour of the Lancashire County Palatine Act. Sir R. INGLIS presented petitions from various places in favour of putting an end to Sunday labour in the Post-office. Mr. BA NKES presented a petition from Sherbourne, in Dorset, to the same effect; also a petition from Corte Castle against the admission of Jews into Par liament. Mr. T. EGERTON presented petitions against Sun day labour in the Post-office. Sir G. GREY presented similar petitions from places in Northumberland. Mr. B. DENISON presented similar petitions from various parts (.f Yorkshire. Mr. LABOUCHERE presented several petitions in favour of the Marriage Bill. . . Mr. C. 110WARb presented a petition from Car lisle against the Jews Bill. NOTICE OF MOTION. Lord NA AS gave notice that on the motion for going into Committee of Supply he ►hould move an Address to the Throne praying her M , sjesty to take immediate steps fur establishing steam communication between this country and the Australian colonies._ THE SUN, LONDON, MOND AY EVENING, JULY 8, 1850. ECCLESIASTICAL BILL. Mr. DISRAELI wished to ask the Noble Lord at the head of the Government whether he intended to bring on the Ecclesisstiesl Bill to-night? Lord JOHN RUSSELL replied in the affirmative. THE IRISH MAGISTRACY. In answer to Sir PERCY NUGENT, Sir W. SOMERVILLE said that Mr. John Fleming, late of Longford, Ireland, had been appointed to a local magistracy in Donegal upon the death of the late Mr. Tyas, with a salsry of about 400 L EXHIBITION OF 1851. Colonel SIBTHORP gave notice that on going into committee of supply he should call the attention of the Government to the letters from the Commissioners of the Woods and Forests to the Lords of the Treasury, which had been laid upon the table on the 4th of July. The Gallant Colonel then proceeded to ask the Noble Lord a question relating to the payment of any sums of money by the Commissioners of the Exhibition of 1851, with reference to any contracts entered into for that Exhibition. Lord JOHN RUSSELL said that when first the Ex hibition had been projected it had been intended to have carried it cut through private contract, but the sense of the country was so decidedly against that mode, that it bad been abandoned, and the only sums which bad been paid were in consequence of those preliminary steps. Colonel SIBTLIORP inquired to what amount, and on what security ? Mr. LAEOUCFIERE said that the amount was not yet ascertained; the security was that of the Commis sioners. WATERFORD, WEXFORD, WICKLOW, AND DUBLIN, AND THE SOUTH WALES RAIL- WAYS. Sir H. VERNEY postponed his motion for a Commit tee of Inquiry into the petitions and printed papers (297) affecting the dignity of the House until Monday next. ECCLESIASTICAL COMMISSION BILL. The House then went into Committee on this Bill. Mr. BERNAL in the chair. The consideration of the preamble was postponed. On clause 1 being proposed, Mr. HORSMAN proposed an amendment to the effect that the Commission should consist simply of three paid C.,mmissioners, who should discharge ad the duties in connexion with the Commission. That proposition he thought was sound in principle and would be found good in practice. The evils in connexion with the existing Commission which they had to remedy were that it was too numerous, inefficient, and irresponsible. Now, to secure an efficient and re sporsible body, he thought the best p!an they could adopt was to have three Commissioners, whose close and constant attendance would insure the due performance of all the business of the Commission. Three classes of public men would, by such an arrangement, be relieved from attendance at the board, via, the judges, the Cabinet Ministers, and the bishops and ministers. The Lerd Chancellor, the two Chief Justices, the Lord Chief Baron, the Master of the Rolls, and the Judges of the Admiralty and the Prerogative Courts were at present members of the Board. Now, what in the world had all those to do with the Ecclesiastical Commission? (Hear.) They had important functions to discharge, and they could not give their attendance at the meetings of the commission without injury resulting to the public ser vice. Therefore public convenience and common sense were alike in favour of the judges being excused from attend ance. Five Cabinet Ministers were members of the board, and he was sure they would be as glad to be excused as the judges. Again, the bishops were paid largely for the performance of other duties, and if they attended to the business of the Commission, those duties must be neglected, and he could not understand on what principle they claimed to have a seat at the Board. Both reason and religion were in favour of the change which he proposed in the Commission, and if the prelates were opposed to him, what construction could they put!on their conduct, except that the duties of their office contrasted very unfavourably with other public duties? No right or privilege of theirs was in any way involved by their not being on the Commission. Those estates consisted of every kind of property known to the Church. Let the House take the cases of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of London. The management of the estates of Canterbury and Lon don were but a tithe of their labours. They bad to take the management of the capitular estates of York, Carlisle, Durham, Exeter, and other dioceses, and in stead of being confined to estates in which they had an especial interest, they bad to become general manager of estates of which they had no knowledge whatever, and of which they could have no know • ledge except by giving such a close attention to those secular affairs as must place the epis copacy in abeyance.—(Hear.) He Mr. Horsmau,) was nut now seeking to do an act which imposed any new doctrine; but he was only resisting a modern and, to his mind, an extremely objectionable innovation. —(Hear, hear.) If the House took this proceeding as a question of policy, what did their experience say? Was Parliament Do well satisfied with the W ad v n a t k ; put workin g o f t hi s C omm i ss i on that it was ready e s s til ( l )f fu th rt e he p r re s s a e c e ri e fi e ce o s f t i h n e oprdreeirarteossrsecuHree be lieved nor e think t h t e h eCommiss ion presence of had t h b e e e n pre any t e thing b a ll e t there we re f ew s i ncere mem b ers o f t h e C hurc h w h o didb n e n ti o t i t e h h e beeena n :t c et ture of the b us i ness i tse lf i n t h e Church. He want e d to ask, there f ore, what there ito of n e t c h e e s s e a r t y t e hd t h a u n t c e t h e o f H t o h u e s e pre s h l o a u t el s d e n nt i ir n ei f y iatu se % e ? lar, Th eh e d b t u h s e it y ies l s e h pw a sas y st e iwa the h Commisin t the e - i o o m o m w i commission o giS f late the (I entirely through orders in Council ; and there was no necessity for the Prelates being members of that board any more than there was of their being at the head of the Hume Department.—(Hear, bear.) The old law of the Church only recognized the Bishop as a spiritual pastor, and the further they attempted to remove from that old law, the greater labyrinths they got into The feelings of the people of England he believed generally wero in favour of more clergymen, and less bishops. And why was that? Why, because the bishops assumed more than they were entitled to under the old law, but the parochial clergy did not.—(Hear.) He opposed it because its object was to perpetuate the hulloing Qf their ecclosiagfical rum with AU Cli• tension of temporary jurisdiction, they ought never to hold. If they wished to make their Commission at all available tt e Commi,sioners must be less numerous, and more responsible. The Hon. Member concluded by moving that three Church Commissioners should constitute the Commission. _ _ _ Lord JOHN RUSSELL opposed the proposition, be lieving it to be in direct opposition to the report of the Committee of that House. ( LEFT SPEAKING.) THE QUEEN'S HOSPITAL AT BIRMINGHAM• An exposition of Birmingham manufactures is about to be held in the new buildings of the Queen's College, during the long vacation, to raise funds to enable the committee of council of the hospital to enlarge their buildings, and to provide a chapel (already endowed by Dr. Warneeord with 401. per annum) for the sick and suffering, duly fitted and arranged for Divine service. An application having la, en made to his Royal High ness the Prince Albert to use his generous influence with her Majesty the Queen to obtai❑ the loan of a portrait of her Majesty and af his Royal Highness, to be placed at the head of the Expositien Room, as a t9stimony of the devoted loyalty and attachment of the institution to the Crown, of the exalted patronage with which it is honoured, and the illustrious auspices under which the Committee of Council are privileged to proceed in their arduous progress. The followi❑g gracious reply has been addressed to Professor Sands Cox, F.R.S., the Dean of the Faculty:— ;" Buckingham Palace, July 4, 1850. _ . ",Sir,—l have submitted your letter, recceived this morning, to her Majesty the Queen and his Royal Highness the Prince Albert, and I am happy to have the pleasure to inform you that her Majesty and his Ro)al Highness have been pleased to accete to the re quest contained in your letter of the 27th ult., for the loan of a portrait of her Majesty and ore of his Royal Highness, to be placed in the Exposition Room. If you will be good enough to communicate to me the time at which these portraits will be required, and the best mode for their conveyance, I will c ,mmunic tte with the proper officer of the household accordingly.—l have the honour to be, Sir, your obedient servant, " C. B. PHIPPS. "William Sands Cox, Esq." __ At a special meeting of the committee of council, held en Saturday last, at which the High-Bailiff, S. W. Lucas, Eqq. presided, on the motion of the Rev. Pre bendary Gray, seconded by Mr. Alderman Phillips, the loyal and dutiful expression of grateful thanks were re corded by the board to her Majesty the Queen with acclamation for this especial Mark of royal favour. EXHIBITION OF 1851. The following letter from the Commissioners of Woods, &c., to the Lords of the Treasury, on the sub ject of the ground appropriated for the site of the Ex hibition of 1851, was presented to Parliament on Saturday : "Office cf Woods, So., June 15,1850. "My Lords,—We beg to acknowledge the receipt of Mr. Hayter's lettvr, dated the Bth inst., i❑ which we are informed that her Majesty has been pleased to give her consent that the Commissioners for the Exhibition of the Works of Industry of all Nations should be allowed to take possession of the site of the ground in Hyde-park rt quired for the building; and we are requested, before giving such possession to the Commissioners, to submit to your Lordships any suggestions, with reference to this matter, which may appear to us as advisable to be adopted. "In compliance with this request, we have to state that we are of opinion that the Commissioners should be required to agree to the following conditions in re gard to the ground in question, viz.:— " 1. That the only entrance into the park which shall be used fs.r the carriage of the materials, Ecc., for the proposed building, shall be that called The Prince of Wales's gate.' "2. That the gateways inside and outside the park, and the roadway in the park, to the extent of 25 yards on either side of the gates, shall be paved with granite at the expense of the Commissioners for the Exhibition, and to the satisfaction of this board. "3. That the ride called the Queen's Ride' shall not be interfered with in any way, either by the construc tion of the works, or during the progress of the exhi bition. "4. That none of the existing drains in the park shall be interfered with so as to impt& their action. "5. That no trees shall be cut or removed without the previous consent of this board. " 6. That the Commissioners will now state the time by which they will engage to remove their buildings from the ground, and in the event of their falling in the fulfilment of such engagement, that it shall be comp.-- tent for this board to remove the same, to dispose of the materials, and to apply the produce in reimbursement of the expenses incurred in such removal. " 7. That when the building skull have been removed, this board shall reinstate the ground in its present con dition, and that the Commissioners of the Exhibition shall defl ay the expense of such reinstatement. " We have to suggest that it would be desirable, with a view to the uninterrupted progress of the works, that a close hoarding, not less than nine feet high, should be erected round the space proposed to be appropriated for the building; but we forb,-ar from pressing this as a condition, the more especially as we think it will be ob viously for the interest of the Commissioners that such a precaution should be adopted. " We are, &c., " SEYMOTJR. A. MILNE. " The Right Hon. the Lords Commissioners if her M.i . j.-sty's Treasury." GEltillA.N Y. On the dissolution of the Wurtemburg Diet, on the 31 inst., by Royal message, the Speaker addressed the Assembly, reminding them of the dissolution of the Diet of 1849 (in December of that year), on which occasion he stated that the dissolution of a Diet was legal if the Government were resolved to respect the will of the people. " The people," said the Speaker, " have now recorded their opinion. They elected an Assembly in which Government had scarcely one vote. But the Government has not re4pected the will of the people. New Minis ters have taken the reins of the State, but the system remains unaltered, and the Diet has again been dissolved. It will soon be shown whether the Government is prepared to submit to the will of the people. But we are justified in protesting that this Diet has done its duty. They had but one alternative—they had either to stand on their right or to yield by degrees, and to forfeit their position. We have chosen the first—we conducted our opposition with firmness and moderation." This speech elicited vociferous cheers. We have received Borsenhalle advices, dated Ham burgh, July 5. The result of the simple peace with Denmark con cluded by Prussia on behalf of the German Federa tion was looked for with much anxiety, as the exact stipulations of the treaty were not yet known. The Russian fleet moored near the Danish island of Moen consisted of eight line-of -battle ships, two frigates, and two steamers. The Copenhagen mail of the 4th had not arrived, probably owing the boisterous weather. THE DANISH. QUESTION. The peace with Denmark is a peacepu;eeisimple. It contains the full reservation of the rights of both parties. The Holsteiners are acknowledg►ed to have been right in opposing Danish aggression. Foreign intervention in aid of Denmark is to be permitted in Schleswig, but not in Holstein, which the Danes will be allowed to enter only on certain conditions. The peace is to be ratified by Prussia within a week, by the German Government within three. The latter will not be waited for. The Duchies are preparing for war. A telegraphic dispatch in the Cologne Gazette, dated Berlin, the evening of the 6th inst., announces the ratification by Prussia and Denmark of the pro tocol which is annexed to the treaty of peace between these two states, according to which the convention of the armistice is at an end. In five days the Prussian troops will leave the Duchies. According to intelligence received, the Schleswig-Holstein troops will then immediately enter Schleswig. The German Reform contains a letter from Co penhagen which states that on the 30th ult. a Rus sian frigate, the Norditiernen cast anchor in that port. Several officers landed and some even tock apartments. Amongst the persons who left the ves sel was M. DE GALSENAPP, Aide-de-Camp to the EMPEROR. That offic.r announced that the Russian fleet bad sailed direct for Alsen. The Cologne Gazette contains a letter from Lu beck, stating that the Russian fleet bad left the port of Cronstadt, and passed on the 13th ult. before the island of Falstein. The fleet cast anchor near that island, and consisted of eight ships of the line, two frigates, and two steamers. "We shall soon learn," says the letter, " what the appearance of this fleet on the coasts of Germany means. DANUBIAN PRINCIPALITIES. According to commercial advices from Semlin, the Bulgarian insurrection is at an end. Is hardly ad mits of a doubt that the rising has been systemati cally organized ; the agitation is notoriously kept up by foreign emissaries. Since the entrance of the Russians into Moldavia they nev , -r had occupied Galatz until on the 14th or 15 , h of June, when sixty Cossacks to the astonishment of the inhabitants of the town took up their quarters there. It is not exactly known what led to the oc currence, but it is reported that it took place at the instigation of the Guvernor, who had forwarded reports of the nightly occurring burglaries, and of the attemp'ed murder of one of the guardians of the quarantine by an lonian, to Duhatnel, at Jassy. The British Consul at Galati is said to have entered an energetic protest against the occupation of the town by the Russians. T ., RARE X 1811.—TWO very rare fish, fine specimens of the " Cepola rubescens," were taken by his Grace the Doke of Marlborough, whilst trawling in his yacht, in Ply mouth Sound, cn Monday last. ilia Grace has ordered them to be preserved, and intends, we believe, to present them to the Natural History Society. It is said that these are the first specimens of .these species of the finny tribe that have been taken near our ghnres alive. Some years since, two were found in this neighbourhood, having washed in from _l4 6 "'DnenFort Indepoidot. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, July 6_ (Sittings at Nisi Prius, in London, before Loid Chief Justice WILDE and a Special Jury.) THE NEW HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT.-BARRY W. REID. Mr. Sergeant Channell anti Mr. J. Addison conducted the plaintiff's case ; Mr. Bovill appeared for the de fendant. This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover compensation in damages fur certain false and slander ous words uttered by the defendant, to the injury of the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and a plea of justification. Mr. Sergeant CHANNELL stated the case to the jury. The plaintiff in this cause is the well-known archi tect of the New Palace of Westminster, and the de fendant has the direction of the arrangements fur ventilating that building. It appears that a misun derstanding had arisen between the plaintiff and de fendant in the year 1845, relative to the arrangements for ventilating the Houses of Parliament. Mr. Barry, on one occasion, said it was a pity that so much expense had been incurred for iron girders and brick work, as they would be rendered useless by the plans of Dr. Reid, which he said were incompatible with the mekiug the building fire proof, which Parliament required him to do. Two meetings took place betwen the parties in 1845; after these no pessanal interviews took place be tween them, but an active correspondence was for some time kept up. Copies of this correspondence, and mi nutes of what took place at the above mentioned meet ings, as noted down by a Mr. Meeson, un assistant of Mr. Barry, were transmitted by the plaintiff to the Com missioners of Woods and Forests. Subsequently to this, it being necessary that a personal communication should take plane 'between the defendant and some one connected with the architectural arrangements of the new palace, a meeting took place on the 25th of April, 1849, between the defendant and Mr. Quorn, the clerk of the works. Mr. Meeson was also present. Dr. Reid, on seeing the latter, exclaimed, " I object to Mr. Meeson being present, on the ground that he, in conjunction with Mr. Barry, forged a document, which was forwarded to the Woods and Forests." O❑ hearing this, Meeson asked him if he was aware what he was saying? He said that he was well aware of what he had stated, adding he had said so before, and would repeat it again. Meesou then said, "If that is the case, I request you to repeat it; and I call on Mr. Quorn to take notice of what you say." Dr. Reid then said, " I mean to say that in 1845 Mr. Meeson, in conjunction with Mr. Barry, forged a document and transmitted it to the Commis • stoners of Woods and Forests; and therefore I decline acting with Mr. Meeson." This was the slander cows plained of. The document alluled to was a copy of the minutes made by Mr. Meeson of what took place at the two meetings above mentioned between the parties. The Learned Sergeant read from a Parliamentary blue-book various portions of the correspondence which had taken place between the parties, and also extracts from the minutes of the conversation at the two meetings alluded to, and was entering upon the compatibility of the plans of Dr. Reid with the provisions in the buildings made by Mr. Barry, when The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, interrupting him, said, that he had listened to counsel for a long while, and had heard much that was totally foreign to the issues before the jury. The Learned Counsel was now entering upon the relative merits of the plans of the rival parties, and the practicability of rendering the building fire-proof, at the same time securing for it a complete ventilation. That was a question which ought to be settled by ano ther tribunal than this; it ought to go before men con versent with science rather than a jury. The only ques tion here to be tried was, whether the word " forgery " was used by Dr. Reid in its most offensive sense, or simply in the meaning that the document alluded to stated untruth. He bad well considered all that had been said by counsel, and it appeared to him that no case had been made out by the plaintiff. The plea of not guilty was a perfect answer to the action, because, in his opinion, the expression used by Dr. Reid at the meet ing was in the nature of a privileged communication, and he should, if necessary, so direct the jury. The action would seem to have been brought with the purpose of bringing the plaintiff and defendant with their disputes before the public; but it was unfair to the country that a jury should be kept in court tor, perhaps, two days, listening to a scientific discussion, altogether irrelevant to the issue they have to try. It was a great pity that these gentlemen should have engaged in a dispute, the effect of which is to delay the completion of the great work they have in hand. The proper course is to discharge the jury, which will have the effect of leaving no imputation upon the character of either of the parties. Mr. Sergeant CHANNELL—I defer to your Lordship's r(commendstion. Mr. BoTILL was quite content to leave his client in the bands of the Court. Long before this action was brought, the charge of forgery had been withdrawn by Dr. Reid. At the same time he must say that Dr. Reid was quite willing to give Mr. Barry credit for good intentions, and to admit that he had not wilfully misre- presented the conversations in the minutes he forwarded to the Commissioners of Wocds and Forests. But Dr. Reid still adhered to his statement that Mr. Barry had made great mistakes. He withdrew the charge that the misstatements were made wilfully. Mr. Sergeant CHANNELL—The charge of forgery and wilful misrepresentation having been withdrawn by Mr. Bovill on the part of his cltent, Dr. Reid would consent to the discharge of the jury. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, addressing the jury, said it appeared to him that the word " forgery" had only been used by Dr. Reid in a sense which imputed to the phintiff a wilful misrepresentatien of facts, and not im porting that Mr. limy had been guilty of a felonious act. The expression had been withdrawn. lie was sorry the mate; had been brought before a jury. " You will. therefore," sail he, " find a verdict f.r the defen dant upon the issue of nor, guilty, and are discharged from finding on tt e other issue." The jury found, accordingly, a verdict for the de fendant. BIRMINGHAM AND OXFORD 'JUNCTION RAILWAY.— At a special meeting held at Birmingham, on Saturday, a resolution was adopted repudiating any exten4ion of the agreement formerly entered into between this company and the Oxford, Worcester, and Wolverhampton Company, with respect to the sale of the Stratford-upon• Avon navigation, which contract, although faithfully adhered to by this com pany to the last, was now at an end. EXHIBITION or 1851.—The proprietors of the Po lytechnic Institution, at a special general meeting on Satur day, voted the sum of 100 guineas bs their contribution to the funds now raising for carrying into effect the Exhibition of Industry. THE Fox CLUB.—The members of this club had their last meeting this season on Saturday last, when they dined together at the Trafalgar at Greenwich. The follow ing noblemen and gentlemen met on the occasion :—The Earl of Zetland, the Earl of Strafford, the Earl of Gosford, the Earl of Scarborough, the E.irl Spencer, the Earl of Leitrim, Viscount Ebrington, M.P., Lord Dinorben, Lord James Stuart, M.P., Lord Marcus Hill, M.P., the Right Hon. Fox Millie, M.P., the Right Hon. Edward Ellice, M.P., the Right Hon. J. W. Fitzpatrick, M.P., the Right Hon. Dr. Lushington, the Hon. Colonel Boyle, M.P., the Hon. E. L. Mostyn, M.P., the Hon. H. Duncan, the Hon. R S. Carew, M.P., the Hon. Charles Compton Cavendish, M.P., the Hon. H. Tracy, Sir W. Gibson Craig, Bart., M.P., Sir Montague J. Cholmeley, Bart, M.P., Sir Robert Heron, Colonel Ferguson, M.P.; Colonel Bolder°, Mr. Edward Ellice, M.P., Mr. F. Dundas, Mr. Rowland Alston, Mr. Stephenson, Mr. A. Stephenson, Mr. E. A. N. Sanford, Sic. PACKAGES FOR HER MAJESTY.—The Lords of the Treasury having caused Mr. Hayter, one of their Lordships' secretaries, to inform the Commissioners of Customs that Colonel Phipps having stated to their Lordships that a pack age containing biscuits, &c., from the confectionary of the Queen of the Belgians, would be sent weekly from Brussels, via Ostend and Thver, under official seals, being for her ➢lajesty's own consumption, and that he was, therefore, to desire that the respective packages on their arrival may be delivered on the application of Colonel Phipps without any further special directions from their Lordships in each case, the Customs authorities have given directions to their officers to take care that their Lordships' wishes be duly obeyed. FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE OF FRIDAY. DIVIDENDS. At the Court, Basioghall-street. W. Star, Lynn, Norfolk, currier and leather-seller, July 27, at twelve—W. Robarts, Burnham, Buckingham shire, apothecary, July 27, at half past twelve—W. Gootch, Bath -street, Clerkenwell, grocer, July 24, st eleven—Charlotte Cooper, Northampton, dealer in Ber lin wool, July 24, at half-past eleven. In the Country. W. Perkin, Utoxeter, Staffordshire, timber merchant, July 29, at ten, at the Court, Birmingham—T. P. Collins, Bristol, tailor and draper, July 31, at twelve, at the Court, Bristol—W. Hague, Manchester, smallware dealer, July 29, at twelve, at th e C ourt , M anc h es t er —J. Smith and William Dart)) shire, Manchester and Egerton within Turton, Lancashire, dyers, July 26, at. twelve, at the Court, Manchester —W. Dar byshire, Manchester and Egerton within Turton, Lancashire, dyer, July 26, at eleven, at the Cou r t, M anc h ester -1. Newton, Ashton under-Lyne, innkeeper, July 26, at eleven, at the Court, Manchester—D. H. Berestord, Stockport, Cheshire, linen& aper, July 26, at eleven, at the Court, Manchester —J. Woraley, Preston, cotton-spinner, July 26, at twelve, at the Court, Manchester—G. Wilson, Wakefield, York shire, draper, July 26, at eleven, at the Court, Leeds— H. Hard), Bradford, Yorkshire, tea dealer, July 26, at eleven, at the Court, Leeds. PAYMENTS OF DIVIDENDS. J. Wenham, Beckley, Sussex, tailor and draper, Is. 2id., on Saturday, July 6, or any three subsequent Slturdays ' between eleven and two, at the of f ice of Mr. Edwards, Satabrook court, Basinghall-street. T. D. Hammond, Kingston-tiron-Hull, druggist and seed crusher, Is. 7id , on Friday, July 5, or any subse quent Friday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Carrick, Hull. J. Garrison, Helperby, grocer, ls., any day on or after July 2, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Young, Leeds. W. Puleston, Wrexham, Denbighshire, draper, 5,., on Monday, July 8, or any subsequent Monday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Bird, Liverpool. T. B. Molyneux and P. Witherby, Liverpool, 81, on Wednesday, July 10, or any subsequent Wednesday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Morgan, Liverpool, E. S. Boult, Liverpool, stock and share broker, 7d., and first dividend of 44d., on new proofs, o n Wednes day, July 10, or any subsequent Wednesday, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Morgan, Liverpool. W. R. Piggott, Goldsmith-street, carpet warehouse man, lid., on Saturday next and three subsequent Sa turday!, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Groom, Abehtirch-lane. C. Vyse, Ludgate-street, straw-bonnet maker, lid., on Saturday next, or any three subiequeut Saturdays, be tween eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Groom, Ab church-lane. J. Bradshaw, Sr. Alban's, tailor, 6id., payable to new proofs, on Saturday nest a'id three subsfiquent Satur days, between eleve❑ and two, at tho ofW2e of Mr. Groom, A bet) urch• labe. J. Starkly, Old-street, St. Luhe'v, carpenter and budder, 6d., on Saturday, July 6, and three subse quent i•-aturd.r.) s, 13, , tween ilt-ven and two, at the office of Mr. Edwards, Sflinbt oDk coun, Basingball-street. Naish and Glenitie, Firringdon-street, ironmongers, Bk., on Saturday, July 6, and three subsequent Satur days, Uetwe,n eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Ed wards, Stinabrook-court, Basinghall-street. J. R. Fisher, Regent-street, chinamar, 341, on Satur day, July 6, and three subsequent Saturdays, between eleven and two, at the office of Mr. Edwards, Sambrook court, Bxsinghall-street. NOTICES OF CERTIFICATES. At the Court, Basicghall-street. E. bile and J. Wonfor, Battersea, manufacturing chemists, July 26, at eleven. In the Country. • R. D. Evans and D. M. Evans, Wrexham, Denbigh- Aire, draper, July 26, nt eleven, at the Court, Liver pool--R. KeAley, Cheltenham, budder, July 31, at twelve, au the Court, Bristol—W. ligue, Munehetter, smallware dealer, July 29, at twelve, at the Court, Man chester—T. Gardiner, Holt, Worcestershire, hotel keeper, July 29, at half-past ten, at the Court, Birming ham. CERTIFICATES GRANTED. A. Rainy, Regent -street, Piccadilly, estate agent— G. Barran, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, wine merchant, certificate of the third class—C. Robertson, Masborough, Yorkshire, steel manufacturer, certificate of the second class, after 21 days from J,ine 29. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. E. M. Heckscher and M. J. Heymann, jun., London and Hamburgh, merchants—E Cobbett and R. Cobbetr, jun., Villiers•strcet, Strand, plumbers—E. Jeffri, s and J. Harman, Bridgewater, chemists and druggists—J. Lowder, G. Raerton, and Alexander Roberton (so lac as regards A. Roberton), Bradford, stuff arid woollen finishers—ll. C. 111.‘Crea and J. Shepard, Halifax and Bradford, worsted manufacturers—H. E. Pack and W. atyton, Boston, Lincolnshire, mercers and drapers—J. Finlay and E. Charlton, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, book tellers—J. H. Williams and T. Sunderland, Leicester, share brokers—W. Faulkner and D. Jowitt, Hudders field, linendrapers—H. W. Sanders, W. Pemberton, and R. Barrett, Clifton, ch' mists and druggists—R. J. Gub bin, J. Hawn, C. Arthur, R. Rowland, J. Penha!e, T. Ham, an l J. Bucknell, Bude Canal, Devon and Corn wall, geLeral merchants—G. Hirst, T. Blrber, and H. Scott (a- far as regards H. Scott), Huddersfield, cloth merchants— W. King, W. Ford, and T. Ford (as far as regards W. King). King-street, CtieApside, woollen ware housemen—J. Hocklns and G.Bennett, New street, Lion street, New Kit-road, brewers—A. A. Kohlbeck and W. M. Brown, Al eragate-street, pocket-13 ink manuf ic turers— W. Mannix. jun., and J. Legge. Wolverhamp ton, ironmasters—J. Hu , kitson and A. Eves, Wapping wall, Shadwell—R. Brevitt an. H. Masterson, Coventry, ironmongers—l'. R. Arrowsmith and J. Slater Boltr.m le-moors, cotton spinners—J. Brennand, W. Slater, ant J. Halsted, jun., Burnley, Lancashire, cotton spinners —W. Greenwood and J. Pennington, Bradford, worsted spinners —H. Hodge and H. F. Home, Blackman -street, Borough, wholesale druggists—F de Porquet and S. Douglas, Tavistock-street, Covent-garden, publishers and booksellers—W. Earnshaw arid P. Hobson, Mas brough, near Rotherham, Yorkshire, porcelain letter makers—J. Stillwell and %V. 11. Cane, Uxbridge, sur geons—S. Turks and G. Torikv, Birmingham, brass tounders—F. Buddy, I'. Ward, and J. Davison, Leeds, wheelwrights. INSOLVENT PETITIONERS. Jrmes Gricnsuell, Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire, innkeeper. John Clarke, Tipton Lower Green, Staffordshire, retail brewer. George Francis, Reading, surveyor. John Nunn, Woo'pit, Suffolk, grocer. Mark D )bell Folkestone, cabine-maker. John Browne, Wulcot, Bath, printer. Thomas Ur wick, Dudley, Worcestershire, assistant grocer. George Sturdy, Helmsley, Yorkshire, ironmonger. William Dore, Newport, Hampshire, grocer. Henry Pipe, Newport, Hampshire, dyer. William Brown, Nur th Lyham, Northumberland, saddler. Samuel Coleman, Trevethio, Monmouthshire, grocer. William Walker, jun., Chew Stoke, Someisetshire, harmer. James Henderson, Pontypool, tuscan and straw hat ma- nufacturer. William Carter, St. Philip and Jacob, Bristol, butcher. Johu Thwai:es, Carlisle, watchmaker. William Curtis, Frampton Mansell, Gloucestershire, baker. Finny Fiddes, Beccles, Suffolk, dealer in glass. Alfred Thomas Bayly, St. Alban, Hertfordshire, news- paper agent. Thomas Lewsey, Sawbridgeworth, Hertfordshire, inn keeper. Joseph Sinkins, Keyfora, Somereetsbire. SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS. W. Dickson, Glasgow, commission agent, to meet within the Wavtrl.l Tavern, Glasgow, July 12 and August 9, at twelve. F. Dick, Dundee, tinsmith, to meet within the British Hotel, Dut.dee, July 10 and August 5, at twelve. A. G. Gilbert, Glasgow, iron and commission mer chant, to meet withi❑ Forester's Hotel, Glasgow, July 11 and August 1, at one. W. Gilchrist, Leith, surgeon, to meet within Dowell's Rooms, Edinburglt, July 10 and 31, at two. THE COUNTr LIVERPOOL, JULY G.—The a. d. a. d.I Y MARKETS. following are the prices : Wheat, per 701 b : s. d. s. d. Do. Meal, perl96lb 14 0 to 14 6 Barley, En,i,lish, pr imperial quarter 26 0 27 0 Irish, Scotch, and arx,per 601 b.. 2 10 3 0 Foreign, grinding 2 9 3 0 itye, per 4801 b • - 22 0 24 0 Beans, English, pr imperial quartr 28 0 29 1 Irish and Scotch, per 4801 b.. 24 0 25 0 Dutch .. •• 26 0— 27 0 Egyptian • • .. 22 0— 23 0 Peas, English, per imperial quartr 28 0 —3O 0 Foreign •• 27 0— 27 6 Oats, per 451 b : Engli,h, Scotch, and Welsh, old 210— 2 11 Irish, new, best mealing 2 61— 2 7 Do., mid and inf. 0 0 0 0 Old •• •• •• 0 0— 0 0 Oatmeal, English, &Scotch,pr24olb 93 0 24 0 Irish, new • . 22 0 23 0 Do , old • .. 21 0 22 0 English, white . 6 4 to 6 6 Do. red .. 6 0— 6 2 [rich, best red 5 6 5 8 Do, lower quality 5 3 5 _ _ 31 aim , red and wh, 59- 6 ( Dantsic,hlglunixed F 1U 7 Do., mixed .. 6 4 6 Rostock, Scc •• .. 6 4 6 5 Hamburgh and Lower Baltic .. 5 10 6 0 America'. & f white 6 0— 6 4 anadian, /red 5 8— 6 Antwerp & Louvain 5 10 6 0 French, red • • .. 510 6 0 l Hungarian and Mariaropoli 5 5 5 8 Odessa, Polish 5 6 5 8 Do., common .. 5 2 5 4 Egyptian •. .. 4 2 4 6 Flour, English & Irish, per 2801 b 29 0 30 0 Do., extra tine 32 0 33 6 United States, per barrel .. .23 6 24 6 Canadian • • .. '23 0— 23 6 inch at corn, per _ . 4801 b, white 26 6 •—•29 0 ItscADING, JULY (.—Wheat, 30s to 51s; barley, 20s to 25s ; oats, 15s to 20s; beans, 28s to 3!!s ; peas, 27s to 32s per quarter. Fat hogs, Ns Od to Os Od ; porkers, Os Od to Os Od per score. Poultry—Fowls, per couple, 3s Od to 3s 6d; uucks, ditto, 3s Ud to 3s bd. Butter, 9d to lld per lb. Eggs, 16 to 20 for I s. WORCESTER, Jinx 6.—The market must be quoted steady and firm, with an inclination upwards. The weather has been exceed'ngly boisterous and wet during the week, and the storms have, in exposed situati..ns, laid the wheat. Wheat is worth on the average 21 Is the imperial quarter. Grinding barley more in request. At Stourbridge market on Friday there was a fair demand for wheat, at last week's prices. Barley a drug, at nominal rates. Beans fully as dear, but purchased only in small retail parcels. Peas in slow demand, without alteration in price, either for boiling or grinding. At Stratfard-on-Avon on Friday there was but a small supply of wheat. Farmers asked higher prices, but millers would only buy at last week's rates. Wolverhampton market was but scantily supplied by the farmers with wheat. Good English found buyers at about last week's prices, with a slight improvement in some cases. Good samples fetched 6s 6d per 721 b. In barley there is so little doing that quwations are nominal. Grinding is the only description at all inquired for, at say 21s per :_92lb. Oats a slow trade, at 17s 4.. d to 20s per 3121b5. English beans were worth lls per 1961 b. At Kidderminster the trade was firm at the prices of last week. EXETER, JULY s.—Cattle Market.—There has been a good supply of stock driven in. Pannier—Goslings, 4s 6d to 5s 6d each ; ducks, 3s 6d to 5s per couple; fowls, 2s 6d to 3s 9d ditto; roasters, 4s to 5$ 6d each ; levere's, 23 6d to 3s 6d ditto ; butter, 8d to 9d per lb ; eggs, 18 to 20 for Is. Corn Market—The market was well attended, and an advance on last week's prices was established. Quotations ranged from 5s 6d to full 5s 9d, with a chance of a higher figure being ob.. tained before the market closes. Foreign was nearly the same price, but firm. Red French, 393 to 40s per quarter ; white Belgian, 42s to 43s ; barley, 3s per bushel; oats, 2$ to 2s 5d ; fine lour, 31s to 32s per sack of 280 lbs. The wool market is rather dearer, bid per lb being given. BRISTOL SUGAR MARKET, JULY 5. Only a limited business has been done in our sugar market this week, and prices remain about the seine ; we look for larger transactions next week, when the reduced scale of duty is in force. Refined goods very steady, and in good demand. Tre,:ele continues dull of late. Rum is in demand.—Bristol Mercury. &sox, JULY 4.—White wheat 5 6d to t 7 s Od. red ditto 4s 9d to 5s 64 ; beans, 3s 6d to 4s Od per bushel ; barley nominal ; oats 1 , s Cd to 21s per qr. KNAREsBoROUGH, JULY 3.—Wheat 5s 3d to 53 9d; beans 3s 6d to 3s 9d per bushel ; barley 4s to 26s ; oats, 18s to 20s per qr. ScARBOROUGIT, JULY 4.—Red wheat 5s 6d to Os Oti, white ditto 6s 3d to Os Od per 5 stones; black oats ed to Bd, white ditto 9d to rd per stone ; malting barley 9s to 21s, grindin g ditto 17s to 19s per qr. of 32 stones; superfine flour 35s to seconds ditto, 27s to 30s per sack of 20 stones. WETHERBY, JULY 4.—White wheat 16s 0d to 17s 6d, red ditto l's Od to 16s Od per load ; barley 2 , s to '26s per q . ; beans Vs Od to 12s Od per load ; oats hid to 9id tier stone. r BANGOR, JULY s.—There was only a middling attendance at our market to-day ; but wheat and barley had each a firmer tone than on this day week. Wheat, best sample%, offered at 41s to 42s ; barley, 20s to 22s ; cats, 17s to 19s ; oatmeal, z3s to 24s per 241 lbs. RHYL, JULY 2.—Wheat 14s; barley, 7s to 7s 6d; beans, 1 ; oats, 6s to Cs 6d per hobbet. Salmon, 9d per lb ; butter, 9d to 10d per lb; new potatoes, lid per lb. ABERDEEN, JULY s . —Grain—Oats is 44:1 to 16s, 401 b per bushel; oats, new, ON Od to 00s; foreign oats, (.06 Od to o.is Od per qr.; barley, 18s to 19s Od, 521bsper bushel; bear, 18s Od tol 91 0d,521bs per bushel; wheat 40s to 4 - is; oatmeal, 12s 6d to 13s Oil per boll ; flour, 303 to 32s per sack. Provisions—Beef, 4d to 6d per lb ; mutton, ditto, 4d to 6d; veal, ditto, 3d to 5d ; pork, per stone, 3s to 3s 6d ; lamb, per lb, bd to 61; tallow, per stone, 4s to 4s 6d ; potatoes, per peck, 9d to Is , bay, per cwt, Os to Os ; rabbits, each, 6d to 7d; hares, each, 1, tid to 24 ; grouse, per brace, Os to us ; butter, per lb, 7d to 81; eggs, per doz, 6d to 7d ; c heese, per cwt, 18s to 23s 8d; hens, per pair, 2s Od to 266 d ; chickens, ditto, 23 Od to 2s 2d ; ducks, ditto, Is rd to 2sl d ; ducklings, ditto, Os to Os Od; turkeys, each, 6 , , Od to 7s d; geese, ditto. 3s 6d to 4a; butter tor exportation ( present eggs, wholesale price, per dozen, Od to credit, 5d ;. pork, per stone of 14Ib s , cur b e d ) ; 4 p lebr loaf, csvt cash , bS s to 4 t i t d s ; ; 3s 6d to Os Od; pork tine, small, 5s bd to Os Od ; pork large, 3s 6d to 4s 3d; ship pork per barrel of '204 lbs, Os to lk Meal—Oatmeal, Is 4d to Os Od ; barley dust, 6d to Od ; pease meal. is 8d to Is 10d; rids, 6d to Od ; bearmeal, ls to Is 3d ; flour, Is 8d to is 10d ; barley, per lb. Id to 2d; barley flour, Is 3d to is 4d. DALKEITH, JULY 4.—The relative weight per four bushels of the three prices of wheat were 18st 81b, IBst 41b, and 17st 111 b. Oats; 126 t 10Ib, 12st 71b, and llst 01b. Barley, 16st 91b, 15st 111 b, and 14et 51b. Peas and beans, 18st 101 b, Ost 01b, and 1 Ist 131bs. DIED te' On the ?.9th ult., at Ashingt o n, Philip N orr is, Southstoke, Sussex. aged 96. 9. ' o ' On the Ist. inst., S. J ose ph, E sq ., R.S . A., age d 5 ic , .4 On the 3d inst., at Arlington-street, Regent'alo, Nita. wife of Mr. Gilson, late of Hampstead, 8,5 4 d VY' On the 3d inst, Miss W. C. Winter, of Queen's -r°s Chelsea, aged 71 London: Printed and Published by MIJRDO - o jgo2 112. q 4 -aria. Pri n t er , at Th e Sun Once' Strand, in the Precinct of `ha Savoy, in th e Middlesex, Monday, July $, 1850. ,------"°. In feri Qrs. Best. C urren t. °r l; 207 Wheat ... ...... £2 4 0 R 2 1 0 Li 14 i 416 Oats li 9 Barley... 1 4 9 1 2 6 71 0 /7 11 Peas and Beans 1 10 0 0 0 0 1 8 ' Avetage of wheat 40s 7 . 0. The ° EDINBURGH GRAIN MARKET, JULY 3.—VVhea.-- A were 667 qrs of wheat in the market t o -d a y, b e ing 569 d ir' jti than last week. Prices w ere 6d u p on th e t op, In tr down on the average. Barley—There were in day's market 79 qrs barley, being 6 qrs less than last er gt , The top price was 2s 6d up, arid the average Is 3d up .2433 p unsold Oats—The quantity of oa t s i n th e market W 55 cps, being 127 qrs less than last week. The top price Was ille same, and the average 9d up-2 qrs unsold. Beans--e, , supply of beans was 81 qrs, being 2 qrs less than last W . 4 26. Pt ices were Id down on th e t o p, an d I s Od up on the sae"' 7 qrs unsold. „ Top of Wheat ... 6441 b. 44s L',l „ Barley ... 57411). 26s „ Oats ••• 44*lb. 2211 B „ u ,, „ Beans ••• ••• ••• 65iIb. 31s Od EDINBURGH CATTLE MARKET, JULY o °3 o of cattle was 548, or 16 les s tha n l as t week. Top price, 7s to ,i current, Os to 6s 6d ; middlin g an d i n f er i or sor t s , Os Od„.. t d, per Dutch stone. At the close a c l earance was not ale, The number of sheep and lambs this morning was 4 'o or 84 more than last week. Top price of best m utton , to Od per lb ; current, Od to Ed ; m iddli ng an d inferi°rlol to Od. Lambs, top, 18s ; current, 13s to 16s ; secondsrl inferior kinds, from 5s 3d to 105 6d a head. a2lb rd INVERNESS, JULY 2.—Wheat, p er qr , we i g hing u oaf bushel, 3-s ( d to 40s Od ; barley, per quarter, w e !g„bis( 5 'lb per bushel, 19 s to ` 2 o s Od ; oats , per quar t er , sceit, t itl 421 b per bushel, ks Od to 20s Od. O a tm e al, per irfori e r boll, 15s Od to Os Od ; ditt o secon d, 14 4 01 to O s Od; 1)3 %0 meal, 12s 8d to Os Od ; peasemeal, 143 Od to Os Od; brain d ; stone, Os 6d to Os Od ; first flour, per 2801 b., 34. Od to 3 6 10 second ditto, 26s Od to 26s Od ; oa t mea l, b est , per s tone °f i d , imperial, Is tid to Os Od; ditto second, I s 4d to Os Od; bl o ts meal, Is 2d to Oa 01 ; peasemeal, Is 4d to Os Od ; firs t e rr 2s 4d cash, 2s 8d credit ; sec on d ditt o , 2 s Od cas h, 251 44 dit. Potatoes, per stone, Od t o Od ; b ee f, per van to 6d ; veal, 4d to 5d ; mutton, 4d to 6d ; pork, Sd fowls, each, 10d to 12d; chickens, per pair, ltd to 16d; d oll! each, Od to Od ; eggs, per damn, 5d to 6d ; butter , of per lb, 9d to d ; ditto, salt, 9d to 10d ; croudie (curds), 6 0 ; four-pound loaf, cash, 5d to 6d ; ditto, credit, bld 10 coals, per cwt, 9d ; hay, per stone. 7d to Bd. CORK, JULY 3.—Flour—First 12s 6d to 13s; eztrs seconds, 12s Od to 12s 6d ; households 9s to 11 s ; thirds. 73 to w e per cwt. Oatmeal lOs 6d to 003; Indian meal Os Od to Os Od; C AsS meal, lOsto OOs Od per cwt. Indi an corn OO s to 00 s Od ___ Bran 3/ 12t6d to 3/15s per ton. Hay—Farmers 40s WON; . 4 1: 0 0 00s ; dealers 00s to OOs Od; average OOs per ton. Straw••••„„r 011 21s Od to 28s Od ; a verage 00 8 ; d ea l ers OOs O d to "`"6i,11 average 00s Od per ton. Bread—Wheaten loaf 6d t. 1, 10 household loaf 5d t o bid per 41b . F resh butter , 8d per lb. Eggs-3s 10d to 46 d per hundred. 740 ) Newport 14s; Lydney 15 s ; L an d ore 14s ; B es t c o Culm 135 per ton. Tallow 38s 6d to 00s Pe r j 6 Whisky, 25 o. p., 5s 6d per imperial gallon. AA t , —Beef 4d to 4icl ; mutton 5d to 60; veld 7, 0 Ii 5d ; pork 34d to Oa ; ba con 6d t o 7d ; sausages be f r y Hops 6/ 10s to 8110 s per cwt. B angor s l a t es 3/ 2 s 6cl to ot. ro e) ton. Bark—Barbary 71 5, to 815 s; Valonia 14/ to 01; 71 5a ; Spanish 91 per ton. Fleece Wool 10s to 12s pet 't Hemp 331t0t,01 per ton. Fish— S co t c h h err i ngs 13 ) to l4'' / ditto 15s to 203 per barrel ; Ne w f oun dl an d 9, Os to i v 00, ton. Timber—Memel, 85. pe r t on ; d ea l s , fi rs t q uality , 00 second quality, 16s per 100. Hides—Market 143 W lb salted 15s to 21s per cwt ; calf skins 2id to 21d Zed Potatoes, white 10d to 12d ; Mi n i ons 14d to 18d ; r t e i iiesti Peruvian, 111 10s; Ichaboe, 91 per ton; Tar--A 198 per barrel. JAAICA. LIVERPOOL, SUND A Y.— M Viti the United States webore advie es from Kingst.)n to the 17th ult. 1106 The Government had issued a proclamations -id togther the local representatives for the purpose °` ( ifsf l tog certain amendme n t s t o a Bill w hi c h Passe dlO session, to raise a loan for the purpose of liquidatiesob liabilities of the island. The Bill in the form i O l O O O it stands at present limit s th e amount o f intervol 240,000/. require d to 4 per cent., a t w hi c h ra te it a st , be procured in England. 1 701 The weather had been excessively warm. rains had fallen. (From De Cordova's Mercantile intelligencerA o o ol No improvement has taken place in the condi t 'bor the market since the date of our last issue, in fe l l t oco ness has been more than usually dull, and the • f ed generally are accumulating. The trade purchase Tbt cautiously, in expectation of a decline in pr ices. or li flour market is largely s t oc k e d, b ut h o ld er s llPP e otr, think that present rates w ill b e ma i nta i ne d, if oiled crewed, in consequence o f hi g h pr i ces i n the oft States. The supply of pi c kl e d fi s h i s it/A en? r f el particularly of herrings. The stock of codfish Is nearly cleared, and prices are looking up. Flour—We have heard of a sale of 370 barr e o ol /. . Philadelphia at 325, Smaller lots of Baltimore tir e moved at the same rate. Meal-170 barrels of Philadelphia have hands at 17s. Rice—The stock of Carolina is enormous e i to r o i market quite stagnant. Holders, however, are B r a y 18s., but the trade refuse to operate th erea t. a '"„ 1 0 11 dia has been sold at 145., but th a t rate ca nnot n" obtained. /10 Butter—Sales of Philadelphia to the extent„ e l i c OtV kegs have been made at 7id. Th e mar k e t st";0(1.B . tinues heavily stocked with lash, for which onli ott , r. d. Bread—Wattson's Pilot is moved at 185. and e lle at 22 in small lots, as %anted. Mackerel—The stock is very heavy, and W i re l l, 28s. cannot be got, at whi c h rate t h e art i c l e is du 11.-rrings remain as last imported. Alewives are scarce at 225. 'Os , 4 0 Oil—Thy market is ov e rst oc k e d. Cod 0 11 , s- „ 1 or 2s. 9J., and whale and lard h ave b een sol d at P rat.. sto Lard is very inactive, no t w i t h stan di ng t h a t the pa, has diminished to a c o n s id era bl e extent . Th e „,ptit: quanti.y of lard oil at mark( t c h ec k s th e conga/ t or , of this article so soon as prices are attemptell raised. Not more than sd. per lb. c a n b e got, for d 1r Coltish—Last sales were at 135. for cask an p. r tiox. Sulu - ion is wanted. 41 0 1/# l'Ork—Mons is taken at 68g. t o 70 s . P r imo is unsunsaleable (l . Perlb! flaws—American change hands at 3d. to 64 ' 1 410 find Llnc..shibo at Bd. The mark e t i s l arge ly slip par.icularly with the f ormer . o °l Soap—We quote Old en ' s 50'b . at 10s., an d 6 01 Its. ; ::t-6's 48tb at 10 s ., an d 56 1 b. feather a t . 1 ' • aid 561 h. and 60Ib. crown at 14., 6d. pe g Candles—A wi.-11 assorted lot from PhilaeelP l3 ', l - 0 11' pl.ced at 6fd. p er lb . S ix . , are plentiful, au d" 6d. Short eights are wanted. p r 1 01 ,1 Cl.eese—D. G. is worth 11d.; American, 7d. 1 4- 1 / Lumber—Part of a cargo from Calais ( 51 ,' 1 '.," i e eov been moved at 105 s. per 1,000 feet. Cedar shil l b worth 16,, and wood hoops 904. per M. , Beef s ells at a ll p r i ces, f rom 375. to 525. Pe' • barr•l, according to quality. TougGes—American pigs' are unsaleable. e Rum is ver. inactive., with a Leavy s tock. 4 m or f o r 3s. la! r gallon, duty paid, cannot be obtained ['root of good brands. Sugar—Prices rai:ge from 134. to 16s. per 10011* L.igwood—We have not heard of any sales. Coffee and Pimento—There is not any at rats"' Freig• ts—Sugir to London at 50s. per ton. f ir Exchang+ s—ple•chant's bills on New York Ar e 21 t 3 per cent., 60 days' sight. 0 Gold—Columbian d ou bl oons , 2f t o 3 p er ee nt.r Old Spanish, per cent. on 17 dollars. Alp e ' . pbmtifal at lf to 2 per cent. Per bottles. Malt—llarvey's al e a n d p or t er b r i ng 7 s . 6d. Pe bottles.JO T.bacco—We report a sale of forty boxes Co ll 16's and 18's, at 12k. IMPORTS FROM THE 6TH TO T HE 17 TH of .101$'1 Flour, 1,725 barrrla ; meal, 361 barrels ; tierces, 5 halt bar re l s , 2 , 71 5 b ags; mac k ere l , 21 w-i"fr,'; herrings. 311 b arre l s; l um b er, P .P., 80,000 feet; IA 40,000 f-a.t ; can dl es, 7 20 h al f b oxes ; lard, 1 , 0 fic l o butter, 622 firkins, 350 k egs; b ee f , 5 half-liarret°; l4 o° 20 barrels, 2 half-barrels; wine, 14 pipes, 2 hog 74 71 cparter-ca, ks; bra n dy, 60 h ogs h ea d s ; woocl hs cre A 29,850 ; bread, 870 b arre l s ; tongues, 75 half' b b 10 firkins; s o ap, 4,118 b oxes; sa l t, 75 tierces; '- 13 hogsheads. 1 THL MISER'S SECRET.—ZiIe of e great charm o new novel is its originality. It is not often that all o they f has either the courage o r the t a l ent to trave l out o ceP.sr and beaten track of roman ce - wr i t i ng, or shows it.--„trel ties of striking out a n ew p at h f ur hi mself. In th i s ,‘" 0,0 however, there is not only a comprehensive plot, 111 , 0 00 the most illustrious characters in the reign of Jal'ifl o o First bear a prominent part, but there is a different ~° o l Vii. treating the chief personages to that which is gee, e '„o l sl, vogue. They speak and act as such individuals tinu (l ",solvil were accustomed to do. The language put into their — dt, is that of the time in which they lived. We have of ri that " The Miser's Secret" will claim a large arnee n : t iol f irl polarity, and en sure for its author a considerable the praise of those who are best qualified to bestow' Messenger. A 10 ~41. [ADVERTISEMENT.]—A Dangerous Woun d t tIP Thigh cured by Holloway's Ointment and Pills.—A b° , u orP l y i l l ' years ago Mr. Acton, of Melbourne, had his thigh A' it lacerated when out riding, his horse running away B ""beti o tr coming in c o lli s i on wit h a wa ll ; b e was con fi ne d to his d nearly eighteen months, suffering from the accident, I S ' withstanding the best medical advice, every effort pr° 0 0 1) ; successful in healing the wound, and his health hecae l : e coy? paired that his life was despaired of; is this state &Old menced the use of Holloway's Ointment and Pills, 1 7 0 ,0 0 the effect of healing the wound with wonderful rap id restoring hirr to sound health.—Sold by all druggistgLo. Professor Holloway's Establishment, 244, Strand, Lenuf. 11111T1 OF A SON. O le On the 15tb May, at the Castle, St. Helena, the o t Captain Macbean, St. Helena Regiment. ' a I'o 1 On the 2d inst., at Stockport, the wife of Dr. —° Nice. CO P On the 2d inst., in Connaught-square, Mrs. Webber. 0 1 /1 OF A DAUGHTER. vrobe',. On the 2d inst , at Croydon, Surrey, Mrs. J. A. 0; On the 3d in s t., in Bry ans to u -stre e t, the ,0 Humpage, Esq. f On the 3d in s t., at Adb ur y-l o d ge , H an t s , th e wife o Richard Lysaght, Esq. M A RRIED f On the 12th ult., at Palermo, the Marquis Ginger' to qualino, of Palermo, to : , •;ary, eldest daughter of the hi t J. Charlton, .bJt , of llesle thed ysie, S\orthutnberland. Pto 7.._t.,0n the 2d inst., at Cathedral, Manches l f n s teol, Fowler, Esq., (1.E., o f Q ueen ' s - square - p l ace, Westnul l iz ot Elizabeth, daughter of th e l a t e J ames B roa dbent, *". Manchester.