The Sun. — London, England, 1851-03-18 00:00:00

GERMANY. The Journal des Debats publishes the following ai a detailed analysis of the report and the proposi tions of the Second Committee of the Conference of Dresden. That body has not yet completed its task, but it has already sent in the five following proposi tions, the adoption of which, the Journal des Debats remarks, will be a rude attack on the constitutional regime such as it is established in several German states :-- " 1. All the members of the Confederation engage to abrogate all the clauses introduced since 1848 into the constitutions of their country, or concerning the consti tutions of these countries, and which may be incompatible either with the Federal Constitution or with the mo narchical principle. " 2 . In all cases where a dispute may arise between the Sovereign and the States of his country either on the interpretation or on the application of the Constitution, the States, as well as the Sovereign, will have the right to submit the question in dispute to the Federal Diet, which will seek to interpose its good offices, or will pro nounce on the question either by itself or through an arbitral tribunal. "3. Any general refusal to vote taxes on the part of the States will be regarded as an act of resistance of the subjects against the Government, and will be, on that respect, treated conformably to Art. 25 of the convention of Vienna of 15th May, 1820. " 4. The Sovereign Princes, united in the Confedera tion, cannot be controlled or limited in any way by the States of their country in the accomplishment of their duties, or in the execution of the conventions resulting from the Federal Constitution. " 5. When, in the cases provided for by Arts. 25, 26, and 28 of the said convention of Vienna, the armed in tervention of the Confederation in a German state shall be necessary, the Confederation will seek to enlighten itself as to the causes of the difference which has arisen; and, in the event of its being found to have its source in the Constitution or in the laws of the country, it will cause them to be modified." The committee in its report explains that the object of its first proposition is the abrogation of the fundamental rights ot the people voted by the Assembly at Frankfort on the 27th Dec., 1848—that is to say, the abrogation of the principle of universal suffrage and that of all re strictions to the right of veto by the Sovereigns. The conference, in adopting it, will virtually adopt, Ist, the abolition of the oath to the Constitution taken by the army ; 2d, the principle of the non-inter vention of the tribunals in cases connected with the rights of sovereigns in order to render impossible the recurrence of what has recently taken place at Electoral Hesse, where the exercise of the public authority was cramped by the judicial power; and 3d, the principle of independence of the sovereign power with regard to the choice and maintenance in office of the Ministers, whose existence will be no longer at the mercy of a fluctuating or chance majority. The com mittee, moreover, declares that it considers the publica tion ot new laws as useless, and that it will be sufficient to correct or revise the federal convention and the final one of Vienna, and it is to this work of revision that its efforts will be applied. THE METROPOLITAN MARKET BILL AND THE CORPORATION. The following is the report of the Markets Improve ment Committee, to whom it was referred by the Court of Common Council to watch the procedings on the Bill for providing a metropolitan market, and conveniences connected therewith, in lieu of the cattle market at Smithfield, now pending in the House of Commons:— " The copies of the Bill having been laid before us by the Remembrancer, we proceeded to consider the same, and are of opinion that the Bill is an unjust and arbi trary interference with the prescriptive rights, privileges, and immunities of the Corporation of the City of Lon don, which ' has been seised in fee of its ancient market from time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary,' and which privileges have been fully es tablished and confirmed by charters from King Edward 111., 'Kings Charles I. and IL, and from other Sovereigns, and still further confirmed and acknowledged by many Acts of Parliament, and especially by an Act passed so lately as the sth and 6th of King William IV., and is in direct contravention of, and opposition to, the opinion of the judges of the land, solemnly pronounced in the House of Lords in 1835, when, in answer to questions pro pounded by the House, they advised their Lordships That a new market could only be legally granted so as to pro vide for what might be called the surplus accommoda tion of the public beyond what the market of Smithfield can afford,' and that the rights and interests of Smith field ought not to be affected; that the Bill would be a grievous interference, not only with the privileges of the city of London, but with the trade of its citizens gene rally, and more especially with those having dealings in meat and cattle, or carrying on business in the centre of the City, and would occasion a disruption of a branch of trade on which upwards of seven millions of money change hands annually in the sale of live stock, inde pendently of enormous amounts paid for dead meat, and would interpose great and unnecessary difficulties to the effectual and speedy accomplishment of commercial transactions in the sale and purchase of so important an item of the people's food; and because the Bill provides for the establishment of a new corporation, consist ing of five persons nominated by the Crown, under the title of Incorporated Commissioners, who, whilst they will be wholly irresponsible either to Parliament or to the country, will nevertheless be invested with arbitrary powers of imposing tolls and fines upon the subject, of making rules and regulations having the effect and force of law, and even of levying a distress without resort to any of the ordinary tribunals of adjudication upon any individual incurring debts to them for tolls; and because the necessarily heavy costs of this Incorporated Commission, together with the sa laries and wages of the staff of officers, and all other k xpenses whatsoever incurred by its authority, are to be defrayed by additional tolls upon meat and cattle dis posed of in the market, thereby inevitably increasing the price to the people of one of the articles which enter most largely into their consumption. And that it is also proposed, for the purpose of carrying out this Bill, to authorise the Incorporated Commissioners to raise a sum of 200,0001. by mortgage of the anticipated tolls to the Commissioners of Public Works, the sole security for sueh loan being the market tolls, dependent in amount on the success of the project, and which, in case of a failure (as at Islington) would leave the amount of a loan for a local purpose a permanent burden on the con solidated fund. That the:Bill further provides that so soon as the proposed new market shall be opened, Smith field market shall be closed, and no new cattle market shall thenceforth be opened within five miles of St. Paul's Cathedral, thus establishing a monopoly in favour of the proposed new market and the parties upon whose lands such market shall be held. That the Bill having been in 4 roduced into the House of Commons was referred to Oke examiner of petit ions for Private Bills, who repotted that the standing orders had not been complied with; and the said Bill and the report of the examiner were thereupon referred to the Select Committee of the House of Commons on Standing Orders, who, after hearing the statements for and against dispensing with the standing orders, agreed to the followinc' resolution:— "' That in the ease of the Smithfield-market Removal Bill the standing orders ought to be dispensed with. That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill on inserting the notices once in the London Gazetts and for three successive weeks in the newspapers; and that the Committee of Selection be instructed not to appoint toe first meeting of the Committee on the Bill for an (earlier day than Thursday, the Ist of May.' " The resolution was reported to the House of Com mons on Tuesday, the 11th inst., and agreed to, and no progress can therefore be made with the Smithfield market Removal Bill for three weeks from the present time. " Under these circumstances your committee have deemed it expedient to be prepared with a petition against the said Bill, and they directed the Rembrancer to settle the draught of a petition in consultation with the counsel retained on behalf of the corporation, and the said draught petition having been approved by your committee they submit the same to this court. " H. L. Taylor. " Valentine Rutter. " Richard Hicks. " W. Webster. " John Dixon. " R. C. Bucknall. " William Williams. " R. Obbard. " Stephen Baker. " George Harker. "J. Josiah Millard. "T. J. Holt. " T. H. Hall. " Dated March 13, 1851." IloW IS THE QUEEN'S GOVERNMENT TO BE CARRIED ON? This is a question to be asked with some emphasis at the present juncture. " After me the deluge!" was the spell by which Metternich mesmerised men into fealty through fear, 6. Myself or a dissolution!" such is the alternative by which Lord John Russell alone can stand. An appeal to the country at a moment like the present . , is t long With the .. N0.,0 Pery' excitement only dormant, and capable of bein g Boon re-stimulated from the hustings into fiercer life; with the ..Free-trade" struggle to be fought under circumstances the most unfavourable to the advocates of progress, i t may well be that the Liberal p a rty should prefer the perpetuati on o f a f ee bl e Mi n i s t r y to the prec ipitation of that great conflict, compared to uccess or failure in which the mere interests of party e as nothing. Before going to the country on th e issue of " Taxed or Untaxed Bread," let us dispose o f the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill. Don't let the cry of "P rotection " be :: iek Don't ex strengthened with the roar of " No Poper y . pose the zeal of the Free Trader . to be s Prote • Religion with the fanaticism of the Rea Lot the Liberal forces whi not Corn and Catholics divide which a return t o fixed they so long united. Do not hazard ctionliisetd. o'er" duties by exposing the weaker brethren to the anathema of relaxed principles. Even with, the utmost d e gree of dissolution•panic of which an H onoura bl e H ou se is capable, i t i s impossible not to foresee more than one tempest g athering on the sky. under stress of which it seems but too probable that the already water - logg od lue must finally ba r . go down. Can the Colonialof- weather Mr. Raillie's Ceylon motion, of which we observe notice is given for next Tuesday week, and whiett lowers ominous on the Journals of the House awaiting " in grim repose " its red-tape prey. Escape is no doubt possible, but surely the Noble and Right Honourable Rulers of the, Colonies must begin to regard Downing-street with those sentiments of natural piety with which men of feeling minds take their last look at the scenes of their greatness and their glory. It would serve no purpose to run through the many similar instances of possibly impending discomfiture: it is the very nal'aire of such a situation as the present to stimulate attack, and enfeeble defence. Men will fight hard . for glory or for life, they will but faintly :itruggle to prolong a state which is, after all, but a lingering death. The Whig THE Ministry carrying through the session of 1851 is a spectacle which it depends on themselves to make either sublime or ridiculous. If, feeling that they are restored to office by a state necessity, they seize the opportunity of signalising their new lease of power, by well-considered and honestly-urged measures of practical reform, they may retire at its expiration with general respect. If, on the other hand, they rely on the peculiarity of the crisis, as a sufficient excuse fir inaction and reserve, the consequences of the national dissatisfaction may prove permanently disastrous to their hopes of future power. Let them be wise in time.— Weekly News. LIGHT LOCOMOTIVE ENGINES. Several months since we gave the working upon the Brighton line of a light locom otive called the " Little tngland," and expressed an opinion that such a class of engines would be found economical for light passage traffic. The correctness of our opinion is confirmed by the following report of Mr. Adie, the engineer of the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway, for which the " Little England" was manufactured. Speaking of this class of engine, Mr. Adie reports— On the 3d of August last one was forwarded to the Edinburgh and Glasgow Railway, under a guarantee that she was to work their express train betweed Edin burgh and Glasgow, consisting of seven carriages, to keep good time as per time bill, and not to consume more than 101bs. of coke per mile ; if she did that to the satisfaction of Mr. Adie, the company's engineer, they should purchase her for 1,2001. But if the work done, or the consumption of coke was not satisfactory, and within the guarantee, Mr. England was to remove her, and take her ,back entirely at his own expense. " After the engine got to work, in order to test her powers accurately Mr. Adie appointed Mr. Cross, one of his assistants, to accompany her for several days, to see the coke weighed and to see the time was properly kept. He also placed one of the best engines belonging to the company, called the Sirius, to run from the opposite end, at the same hours and with a similar train, in order to compare the one with the other. " They worked a week, the Sirius starting the morning trip from Edinburgh, and the Little England from Glasgow. They then changed ; and the Sirius started from Glasgow and the Little England from Edinburgh, thus making a fair division of the work, and the result proved that the small engine kept better time than the larger one, so much so that the manager, Mr. Thompson, was obliged to order the driver not to run in before time for fear of an accident. Her consumption of coke was 81b. 3oz. per mile, while that of the Sirius was 291 b. loz. per mile. " The Little England would frequently run a mile in 60 seconds, and sometimes less. She started with less slipping, and could be brought to a stand in much less distance than the large engine. " The engine was afterwards tried upon the Campsie Junction line, where there is an incline of 1 in 75 for three miles, and a station upon it. She took up seven carriages and a luggage van crowded with passengers, and as she had to stop at the station upon the incline, Mr. Pa ton, the locomotive superintendent, who accompanied her, ordered a large coupled engine to follow to assist her away from the station, if necessary; but she went away with the train at the rate of 30 miles an hour, and the heavy engine could not catch her; for the result proved that the heavy engine could not ascend the incline alone at the rate of 30 miles an hour. " When the engine got to the top of the incline, where another branch line comes in and joins the main line, she took on six more carriages, making in all 14 , and took them into Glasgow in good style, surprising every one who witnessed it. " She is now running the express trains between Edinburgh and Glasgow, consisting of five carriages, with a consumption of only eilbs. of coke per mile. During the heavy gales and bad weather which prevailed in the early part of January, she was the only engine upon the line that kept time. " Oa the 7th of September Mr. England sent another similar engine to the Liverpool and Southport line, where she took a train of ten carriages up an incline 1 in 100, stopping and starting upon it, and where there is also a sharp curve. She was delivered subject to a guarantee that she was to run a train of seven car riages at the rate of 45 exiles per hour, and ascend an in cline of 1 in 100 at 25 miles an hour, with a consump tiOn of coke not exceeding 10lbs. per mile. "She proved herself more than equal to the guarantee, and the directors paid for her when she had been in work a week, considering she was more than equal to the contract. 2" There is one at work upon the Dundee and Perth line, which has been working there since June, 1849, and the locomotive superintendent declares that she has not cost them sixpence in the shape of repairs during that time; that she is always ready, and runs the mail train of four carriages between Dundee and Perth daily." HOW A CLERGYMAN SERVED A SCAMP. (From the Devonport Independent,) A. few days since a young man, of respectable ap pearance and address, called at a bookseller's shop in this town to ascertain the names of some of the Protestant clergymen of the neighbourhood, and having been in formed of the Rev. Mr. Herbert, of St. Paul's, and the Rev. Mr. Tagert, of St. Mary's district, the latter of whom was mentioned to him in reply to his inquiry for an Irish Protestant clergyman, the scamp left the shop Baying that was the very gentleman he wanted. It appears, however, that he first visited Mr. Herbert, who listened to his tale, but suspecting it not to be " genuine," dis missed him without a copper. He then found out the residence of Mr. Tagert, and was admitted to an au dience. He told a plausible story about the position and wealth of his family, his own indiscretions, privations, his present utter want of resources, and his hopes of a remittance from his father on Thursday. This was on a Monday. "He had been in this neighbourhood some days, and was lodging at a house in Plymouth, where ho had a thorough clean and comfortable bed, for which he paid 6d. a night; in all his privations he said he had never slept in any but a clean and comfortable bed, and should be very sorry indeed to be compelled to do so." " Very proper," said Mr. Tagert, " I quite approve of your appreciation of cleanli ness." " Well, sir, was the reply, " unless I can obtain some help to pay for my bed until Thursday, when I re ceive the remittance from my father, I shall be reluctantly compelled to give it up." Mr. Tagert intimated his desire to help a countryman in distress. This admission acted as a spur to the young man, who still more press ingly and pathetically urged his suit, and eventually' succeeded in extracting from the kind-hearted clergy man 3s. After an abundance of thanks, and reiterated protestations of his determination to repay the money on Thursday, he bade Mr. Tagert good morning, and left. Encouraged by this success, he resolved to make some further use of his coun tryman's kindness, and with this purpose he returned the following day. He said he had paid the 3s. for the bed, but the people of the house had told him, unless he took it for a week, they should let it to some other per son, whom they represented as anxious to engage it; now the bed was very clean and comfortable, and he should be very loath to give it up,—would Mr. Tagert help him with the loan of a few shillings more until Thursday next ? he would be sure to repay it then, for since he was there on the preceding day he had got some engagement in view with a Mr. Doel, a builder, in Fore-street, as a painter, and a further favour would be conferred by giving him a letter recommending him to Mr. Doel. Mr. Tagart, who was at the time just about leaving his house on some engagement, cut this conference short by handing the applicant ss. (which ho said would be sufficient to last until Thursday), and by declining, for the present to write any letter of recommendation. On the following day Mr. Tagert was favoured with another visit, and told by his persevering countryman how much he felt obliged for the kindness shown him, and how he would on the following day return the money he had received, and ended by the singular request that Mr. Tagert would still further increase his already deep debt of gratitude by lending him a shirt! He had been invited by some person to dinner, and had not a clean shirt to put on. Mr. Tagert hinted that his shirts were much too large, but, not to be put off by an ordinary rebuff, the young man said, oh, he would make the shirt fit beautifully and re-urged his suit with so much effect that Mr. Tagert sent his servant for a clean shirt, and handed it to the applicant, who expressed his thanks, and left, again promising to return the next day with the money and the shirt. Thursday passed and Mr. Tagert saw nothing of his " friend." On Friday the youth still kept in the " shade," and Mr. Tagert began to think he had been duped. However, he was not desirous of losing his money and his shirt easily, so ho was deter mined, if possible, to find out the gentleman. He dis covered at length that a man answering to his descrip tion had been seen by Mr. Doel, at the " Black Horse," and Mr. Tagert requested if he should come again that Mr. Doel would immediately send for hitn. The clock having struck eleven Mr. T. gave him up for the night, and proceeded to go to bed, but when half undressed a mes sage came that " the gentleman" had arrived. Mr. T. immediately put on his clothes, and arming himself with a massive crab-stick, proceeded to the house of Mr. Doel, who showed him into a room, and having intro dured the " young Irishman," left the room, closing the door after him. Neither spoke for a moment, but Mr. Tagert, who is a tall muscular man, looked full and steadily upon the sharper, who after a pause, said, "I see I am done, sir." " Yes," responded Mr. Tagert, " You are done, as I will teach you, although you thought to do me; " you see this stick ?" (elevating his ponderous weapon), "Yes, Sir, I could not well help seeing it," " Well, sir, repay me the Bs., or in a few minutes you will feel it." The prospect was not a pleasant one, and, again acknowledging ho was done, the impuenthe had scoun drel dived hia hand into his pocket, in which more money than Mr. Tagart required, and brought up the Bs., and handed it over with far more reluctance and far less grace than he received it. Mr. Tagert then said, " But now for the shirt." " Ile was very sorry, but the shirt was not in the house; if Mr. Tagert would give him until the morning he would honestly return it." " No, no," said the per severing c l er i c , " I mus t h ave it t o - n ight." Seeing he had a customer not to be played with, the young man said, " Well, sir, I will at once take you to where the shirt is, and give it you." On leaving the Black Horse they took the way to George street, and down towards Mount Thinki ng his object might be to give w hi a ni lker and runne r , w thelipMr. Tagert said he was a good once sawade h a i m pr w a o ct u i l e d ui h ar av a e p n pl o ie e a d v t iefifilculty strangerli believing, who thefre from statement, him.he by and m adding teat, if he at t em ptedloton o runf mightt mak e" quite sure he would be caught in next to no time, and, at the same time , perhap s ca t c h a bl ow from his cra b-stick, which would not easily be forg otten. y passed across shirt direct. The ningi but would He protested he had no intention of run ' Mount Wise, down the bill, and out to Rich take him to the mond-walk, when Mr. Tagert said, " I am con tent , to walk wit h y ou to where the shirt is, but I have no wish to be walking about towards ait ll ntierefor eh ght, ae a I do not think you aro going UN, LONDON, listen to me, unless you take me direct to the shirt, and be there within ten minutes from this time, I will give you such a beating with this stick as I think you will not much relish." Under this threat the rascal confessed he was not going towards the shirt, but he would now do so. They then turned back, returned up the hill across Mount Wise, out at the Southern Barrier Guardhouse, down Stonehouse-hill, over the Bridge, up Union-street, Stone house, Union-road, Plymouth, and then through Flora street, into Stonehouse-lane; into the very midst of the locality inhabited by cadgers, lurkers, thieves, and sharpers of all sorts, and into which few men, knowing the character of the neighbourhood so well as Mr. Ta gert, would have had the courage to have ventured at midnight, especially in such company. Determined not to be beaten, Mr. Tagert boldly went forward, and, on his companion knocking at the door of a public house, he refused to give him the chance of then escaping him, by acceding to his request to wait outside the door "while he went in after the shirt;" but," said the young man, " the room is a very small one." "No doubt," said Mr. Tagert, "if you can get in, I can also do so; at all events I will try." They went in, and in a room, not a small one, they found the shirt tied up in paper, apparently just as the fellow had received it from Mr. Tagert's ser vant. Mr. Tagert secured the shirt, and then gave his countryman some advice, enforcing one por tion by repeating it again and again—and that was that he should at once leave the town, lest in the morning he should find himself in the custody of the police. Whatever use he made of some portion of the Rev. Gen tleman's advice, it is evident he was disposed to risk the chance of being taken into custody, for on the following evening, after eleven o'clock, he found his way to the residence of the Reverend AL B. Hutchinson, the incumbent of St. James, Devonport, whom he saw, and after apologising for calling so late, said he had come to him as the clergyman of the parish to ask his advice; the fact was, he said, he was the son of a gentleman, and had been sent to Paris by his father's wish to make himself acquainted with the pictures in the Louvre as the means of improvement as an artist, but was sorry to say that he had lived " too fast," and as a consequence bad been obliged to leave France. During part of the six months he bad been in England he had been engaged as a scene painter at Tiver ton. All went on well enough until a few weeks since the manager put his name (Mr. Arthur) in the play bill ; this reached his father, and the conse quence was a letter informing that unless he gave up his eonnoxion with the theatre, his father would give him up and never again acknowledge or assist him; under this pressure he had left Tiverton and come into this neigh bourhood, and hoped to get employment here. He bad written to his father who had promised him money, as the letter which he handed to Mr. Hutchinson would show. This letter had all the appearance of a genuine document, and promised him a remittance on Thursday. Now what he wanted advice upon was how he was to subsist until the money arrived from his father on Thursday. Mr. Hutchinson saw no reason for disbelieving the story, and the time not admit ting either of inquiry, beyond the applicant himself, or of arrangements for his relief, thought the best prac tical aid he could render was to let the young man have ss. whereon to subsist, until other steps could be taken. He thanked Mr. Hutchinson for his great kindness, and promising to see him again, bade him good night. We need not say that he has not yet returned, and that we believe Mr. Hutchinson does not entertain an idea of the amount being returned to him through a post-office order. THE COUNT] The following is the official corn, &c., received in the pc Essex, from the 10th March, both inclusive : Y MARKETS. statement of the quantities cf .t of London from the ports in 1851, to the 15th March, 1851, Y ' AA lig ti ef, v cci Oit:qa ;.4 Colchester 5O 44 460 I 4 718 Harwich Leigh Maldort 382 1 16 350 1 36 177 40 470 CHELMSFORD, MARCH 14.—Prices tu-day were AS follow: CHELMSFORD, MARCU 14.—Prices . -day were _ follow:- Wheat, white, old 42. to 465; new 41s to 461; red, old 36s to 41s ; new, 36. to 403; barley, 251 to 291 ; chevalier 21s to 295; grinding 18s to 248; oats 15s to 203; malt MI to 55s ; chevalier 54s to 561; peas, partridge, new 278 to 29s ; old, —s to —1; white, new, 26. to 28s ; old, —s to —s; dun, new, 26s to 28s ; beans, tick, new 24s to 268; old, 248 to •273; harrow ticks, new 25s to 278; old 00s to 00s; ma zagan, now 23s to 25s ; old ON to ON per qr. COLCHESTER, MAR.cia 15.—Wheat, white 421 to 465; red 36, to 40s ; barley 22. to 281; beans, macagan 22, to 238; middle and small 24. to 28s; peas Ns to 281 per qr. HADDINGTON, MARCH 14.—The following are the prices of grain at our market to-day:— Wheat. Barley. Oats. Beans. First ... 50s Od I 32s Od 233 Od 31. 'Od Second ... 393 2d 28, 9d 20i gd 273 5d Third ... 343 Od 21a 6d 171 Od 25. Od Total quantity of Wheat in market 309 qrs., 300 sold Do. Barley do. 209 qrs., 208 sold Do. Oats do. 521 qrs., 508 sold Do. Beans do. 219 qre., 203 sold GLASGOW, MAROEI 12.—Provisions—Cheese, 33s to 421 Od per cwt •, retail, 5d to 6d per lb. Skim milk, 20s0d to Os per cwt. Country fresh butter, lid to Od per lb. Irish pow dered, in lumps, 10d to bold ; country powdered, wholesale, 8d to Od. Country eggs, 841 per dozen ; carried hen ditto, 5s Od per 120, or bid per dozen. Hens, 2s 9d per pair ; Ducks, 25 6d. FALKIRK, Mattes 13.—The supply of grain - in this day's market was 787 bolls; wheat at 17s Od to 21s Od per boll ; barley, 16s 3d to 188 Od ; oats, 12s 6d to 15. Od; beans, 12s 9.1 to 153 Od per boll ; oatmeal, Os to Os per load. PIERTH, MARSH 14.—Wheat, old, 000 Od to Os Od; ditto, new, 353 to 391; barley, new, 19e Od to 21s Od; oats, 131 to 171; peas and beans, 22s Od to 21s per quarter. Oatmeal, per sack, ON to 28s. Katso, 111s.acx 14.—Wheat, old, Vs to 21ts; ditto, new, 188 to 30s Od ; barley, new, 128 Od to 178 6d ; ditto old, Os to Os; potato oats,oos to 00s Od ; ditto new, 12s to 141 Od ; common oats 00s Od to ON Od ; ditto new, 11s to 13. Od ; peas, 19s Od to 20, Od ; beans, 19, to 20e per boll of six imperial bushels. STIRLING, MARCIA 14.—Wheat, foreign, 20s to 24s ; ditto, home, Os to Os; ditto ditto new, 18s Od to 20s Od; barley, per boll of 6 bushels, NOd to Os Od ; ditto new, 15 s 6 d to 1 7s 6d. Oats, common, 00s Od to 00s ; ditto new, 10. Od to 12s 6d; ditto, Flemish, Os Od to Os Od; ditto ditto new, ON Od; malt, distillers, 31. 6d to 338; ditto brewers, 32s 6d to 341; beans per boll, ON Od to 00s Od; ditto new, lis 3d to 14s 6d; pease 00s od to 00. Od; flour, new per sack, 311 to 33. Od; ditto common ditto, 188 6d to 20s Od; oatmeal, per load, 00s Od to o,)s Od; ditto new 26s Od te 26s 6d ; ditto per peck of 71bs, 7id to 844; fresh butter, per lb, 9d to lld ; eggs, per dozen, 64.1 to 7d ; hay per ton, Os Od to Os ; ditto new, 80s Od to 84s. BERWICK, Masten 13.—Wheat, 31s 9d ; barley, 228 9id ; oats, 18s 10Id ; rye, 003 Od ; beans, 00s Od ; peas, ON Od average per imperial quarter. Hawicx, Mallen 13.—Wheat, new, 181 to 30s Od; barley, new, 12, to 17s 6d ; ditto old, ON Od to 00s Od ; potato oats, 12s Od to 14, Od ; common oats, 11s Od to 14s ; ma, 198 Od to 208 Od; beans, 198 Od to 208 od per boll of six imperial bushels. COAL MARKE' Chester Main l2s 9d , East Adairs Main lls 6d Howard's W. IL Neth. 14s 6d Longridge'sW llartley 14s 6d Wylam Wall's End, &c. : T. -YESTX /WAY. Richmund Russell's Hatton Stewart's Whitwell Denison 135 3d IHartlepool Eleugh Hail Ke110e.........•. 148 6d 'Thornley }Whitworth . Backhouse l2B 9d Maclean's Tees l2s 94 . Pease's West l2B Gd Seymour Tees Tees Birchg. Graigola 19s Od Cowpsn Hartley Hartley ........ 13s 6d Sidney's Hartley larkat, 188. Gosforth . Harton Hotspur 123 6d' Lawson l2s Gd,l Northumberland Riddell Eden Main Braddyll Burnhope... etton Haswell lis 6d Lam bton Lumley l3s 6d Ships at m SEABORNE MAILS. [N Mottles that tho mails are sent irons the General Pest-oaks by the night—and M by the morning--tispatch.) PLACES. From what' port dis patched. When due. America (by Brit. pkt.) N America (by U.S. pkt.) N : Aviaries (by U.S. pkt.) M Africa (West coast).. N Alexandria* • • ...... N Belgium • • .. N Brazil Buenos Ayres • • .. M Californla(viaChagres) M Cape of Good Hope N Constantinople * N Central America .. M Channel Isles • • .. N Chill . France .. M & N Greece* .• N Hamburgh N Molland Honduras . N Ireland .. N India(via Southamp.) M India (via Marseilles) N Mediterranean (via Southampton) • . M Mediterranean (via Marseilles) N Mexico MI Madeira • • • • .. Malta* .. N Liverpool.. Liverpool.. Bouthampt. Plymouth Dover .. March 26 Arrived Aprils April 3 March IS Daily April 12 April 12 March 20 April 3 March 20 March 20 Tn. T 11.3 a March 20 Twicedaily March 20 Tues. Sat. Mom.Thvr March 20 Twicedaily March 21. , March 20 Dover .. Southampt. Southampt. Southampt. Plymouth. Dover .. Southampt. Southampt. Southampt. Dover •• Dover .. London .. London .. Southampt. IHolyhead ISouthantpt. :Dover •• Southampt. Ilfareh 28 Dover •• Southampt. iSouthampt. March 20 April i April 12 March 1 V Dover Naples• .. • . .. N Papal States* .. .. N Peninsular.. • • .. M Peru .. .. .. .. M Tuscany* .. .. • • N West Indies .. .. M West Indies (except Havanna & Nassau) M * The malls to those c French packet via Marsei ;Dover .• ;Dover .. 'Southarnpt. Bouthampt. Dover I Southarapt. March 22 March 22 April '24 March 28 March 22 March 22 I Southampt. April 5 Led (*) are convoyed Ly taken made up in General Poet-office London. 'March 23 March 21 .. .• March 23 14th of the month 19th 8c 30th of mo. Daily •• .• 9th of the month 9th of the month 17th of month 14th of month 7th 17th 27th of mol 2d & 17th of mon. Mon., Wed., & Fri. 17th of the month Twice daily .. .. 7th 17th 27thef ino Tuesday & Friday Wednes. & Sattir. 17th of the mouth Twice daily .. .. 20th of the month 17th& 24th of month tOth of the month 7th& 24tk ofmonth 2d of the month.. 19th of the month 7tb,17th,19th,27th & 30th of month s th 15th 25th of mo; sth 15th 25th ofmo: 7th 17th 27th of suo , 17th ut tho month sth 15th 25th of mo, 17th of the month 12d of the month .. ountriea thus mar] GOOD FOR HOARSENESIL—MII. Billington, the queen of all English singers, came one night to Drury-lane Theatre, to perform Mandane, in Artaxerxes, so hoarse as to render it a question whether it would be possible for her to appear before the audience. To add to her perplexity, her maid had mislaid the key of her jewel-box, but persisted that her mistress must have got it with her. "What can I have done with it ?" said the syren. " I suppose I must h ave swallowed it without knowing it." "And a lucky thing, too," said Rewitzer, "it may perhaps serve to open your chest." SINGULAR ACCIDENT.—Last evening a cabman named Masters bad driven to the stand near the border of the Channel, with the view of getting a fare from the pas.iengere by the Harwich steamer. After the vessel had arrived, and whilst she was blowing off her steam, the horse, a bli n d one , became frightened, and as the d river was in the act open ingof the door in order to put two passengers i ns i de . the cab, g it a s in u i d n d g en h l i y s fseteatrthedurorff,iedstuinntinb;lietdhedoananthneehdecFlinvrit3a., moment e r n e ; the horse kept his h ad above the water, but the weight the cab soon sunk it, and in a minute the sweeping tide car ried both horse and vehicle down the river far beyond the reach of help.—lpswich ..fflxpress. The Marquis of Lansdowne, Lord President of the. Coun cil, returned to town yesterday, from his seat, Bowood Park, Wilts. +,r . TUESDAY EVENING, IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS, March 17. The SPEAKER took the Chair at Four o'clock. ANCLIOR ASSURANCE (No. 2) BILL. This Bill was read a second time. EAST STONEHOUSE WATERWORKS BILL. This Bill was read a second time. GENERAL REVERSIONARY AND INVEST MENT COMPANY BILL. This Bill as also read a second time. DIVORCE BILLS. Maclean's and Ileatheote's Divorce Bills were read a second time. WARKWORTH HARBOUR DOCK BILL. This Bill was also read a second time. BUCKINGHAM'S COMPENSATION BILL. Mr. ELLIOT moved the postponement of this Bill until Monday next. Mr. BROTHt RTON presented a petition, and begged that the Bill might be postponed, or altogether dropped, for Members had been continually brought down most unnecessarily. Mr. PLO WD)N said that under the circumstances he should move that this Bill bo read this day six months. Mr. W. PATTEN explained that the only reason for postponing the Bill was the illness of the Noble Lord by whom it ought to be moved. Mr. ROEBUCK wished to inquire of the Speaker whether this was a private or a paulic Bill? It appeared to him that the compensation contemplated by this Bill was to be granted out of the funds contributed by the in habitants of this country. If ao, it was evidently a public Bill, and eight to be dealt with accordingly. Tho SPEAKEt said that the Bill had been brought before the House 'tree 3 ears ago, when one of his thoughtpre correctly, had decided that With regard to the other portions of i t nd nd al3 L oarned Gentleman's inquiry, he might dec w e a s thes o a r privates, Hon. a ti say that as he understood the matter, the compensation was to be given out of the funds in the hands of the East India Company. Mr. ROEBUCK then assented to the propriety of treating it as a pritste Bill. Mr. WILSON PATTEN moved that the Bill be taken into consideration 05 the Monday after Easter. Mr. CHRISTOPHER suggested that that would be Easter Monday. On the suggestion of Sir R. INGLIS, I Mr. PLO WDEN then withdrew his amendment. I On the motion of lir. BROTHERTON, the Bill was then ordered to be I'M a second time on Monday. SMITHFIELD ENLARGEMENT BILL. ' Sir JAMES DUKt moved that the Bill be postponed till a future day. Mr. CHRISTOPEZR was surprised to hear such an announcement from the Hon. Baronet, and wished to know what was the ,atention of the Government with respect to this Bill in the event of the City persevering with it. Mr. C. LEWIS sail that it was decidedly the in tention of the Government t o oppose t h e Bill. Mr. OSBORNE said that he thought the Bon. Baronet was pursuing a very iajurioue course to his supporters by continually postpoiing this Bill. He stood there to advocate the plan of tie Corporation, as the best plan that could be adopted, but his hands were now com pletely weakened. Sir J. DUKE said tint he was in the hands of the City authorities, and trust abide by their decision. The Bill was then postponed. PZTITIONS. Mr. TUFNELL presented a petition, very numerously signed by the inhabitalts of East Stonehouse, against the late Papal aggressite. Mr. Muntz, Mr. Speller, and several other Members, presented petitions frog Birmingham and various other places, praying the Reuse to resist the Papal aggres sions. Mr. REYNOLDS and Sir. B. WALL presented several petitions from various Ilaces 'against the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill. Mr. Cowan, Mr. Homy, Mr. Roche, and several other Members, presented petitions, praying for the abolition of the paper duty. Sir W. CLAY presented a petition from the Tower Hamlets against the Smithfield-market Removal Bill. Mr. HENRY and sone other Members presented pe titions praying for the abolition of the window-tax. Mr. COBDEN presented a petition from the inhabitants of Falkirk and Airdrie, stating that the grossest bribery and corruption had prevailed during and previous to the late election. They stated that not less than fifty houses of entertainment had beets opened for the corruption of the voters, previous to tits election, and they prayed that this Hon. House would institute a sifting inquiry into the circumstances. Mr. COBDEN also presented several petitions from different places in Yorkshire against the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill. Mr. R. PALMER pretented a petition from the dis trict of Newbury, complaining of agricultural distress; also a petition from the butchers of a place in Sussex, against the removal of Smithfield-market. The Earl of ARUNDEL and SURREY presented a petition against the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill. Mr. M. GIBSON protected a petition in favour of the establishment of county financial boards. Mr. SCULLY preserved a petition from the county of Kildare, against the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill. Alderman TUOISIPSUN presented a petition from the city of London, compl,ioing of abuses in the manage ment of the Board of Customs, and praying for inquiry; also a petition from the coal merchants of the City, praying for the removal of Smithfield-market. Mr. BANKES presented a petition from Dorset com plaining of the Papal aggression. Mr. S. CRAWFORD pretented petitions from places in Ireland against the Ecclesiastical Titles Bill. Sir GEORGE GREY Presented a petition from Nor thumberland praying for the repeal of the income-tax levied under Schedule D.--(Elear, hear.) Mr. BLAKE presented a petition fr om Galway against the Ecclesiastical Titles 3 ill , an d p ra y ing that the property and income of tI4 Established Church in Ire land might be ma de availatim for the purposes of charity and education. Mr. W. WILLIAMS presented a petition from an individual complaining of ti e detention of certain letters at Quebec a SUNDAY TRADING BILL. Mr. BARING WALL 4ave notice that when the Sunday Trading Bill c ame on for seco nd reading he should move that it be real a second time that d a y six months. Mr. SCULLY moved for copies of all correspondence in reference to the conduct of Thomas Young Prior, Esq. (a magistrat e of the County of Galway). wi th his Excellency .the Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, or with the Lords Justices, in the month of July, 1850 ; and also, a copy of any warrants issued by the said Thomas Young Prior, Esq., in Jun e last, f to the Bridewell of C li fden, in the county o f Galwa y .— Agreed to. q th e committal of prisoner s EXPENSES OF POLICE IN LIMERICK. Mr. SCULLY also moved for a return of the number and the expenses of the police force in several baronies in the county of Limerick. —Agreed to. PAYMENTS DUE FA DM BISHOPS TO THE ECCLESIASTICAL COMMISSIONERS. Sir B. HALL moved for a return of copies of all cor respondence or communications between the Ecclesias tical Commissioners and the Archbishop of York, the Bishops of St. Asaph, Bath and Wells, and Ely, in re spect of the sums due from such Archbishop and Bishops to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, as set forth in the third and last report of the Ecclesiastical .. ... . Com missioners of England, page 54—viz., from th e Archbishop of York ... £2,317 1 4 2 Bishop of St. Asaph .. ... ... 1 ,661 0 10 Bishop of Bath and Wells ... ... 3,45 0 0 Bishop of Ely ... ... ... ... 0,242 7 3 Total ....£16,717 2 3 with the dates of such correspondence or communica tion, and the periods when the several sums were in all thereon.—Agreed to. REMOVAL OF WESTMINSTER -BRIDGE. or part payable, and any minutes of the Co mmissioners Sir R. H. INGLIS wished to know what measures had been taken by the Government to carry out the recom mendations of two Ccmmittees of the House with re spect to pulling down Westminster -bridge and selecting a new site for the erection of a new bridge? Lord SEYMOUR stated that at the close of the last session a Committee was appointed to inquire into the state of the present bridge, and to consider whether an other bridge ought nct to be substituted for it, and whe ther the existing sit e was in all respects th e most desir able. On the last subject the Government rec eived such conflicting evidence th a t th e y were satisfied they were not in possession of sufficient information to enable them to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion. It was, therefore, 'determined that a Committee of Inquiry should bo ap pointed to ascertain whether the present or any site would be most convenient for a new bridge, and in a few days ho would be able to state the names of that Committee. ASSUMPTION OF ROMAN CATHOLIC TITLES IN NI4FOUNDLAND. In reply to Mr. CO 0611 - A NE, Mr. LABOUCHERE, in the absence of Mr. Hawes, stated that dispatches had been received from Newfound land conveying the information that a Roman Catholic priest had assumed the title of Bishop of Newfoundland by favour of the Holy See, and that Earl Grey had replied to it, that the individual in question had no right to use such a title. In answer to a quesition from Sir R. 11. INGLIS, Mr. LA.BOUCLIERE said there would bo no objection to lay the dispatch on the table. METROPOLITAN BUILDING'S BILL. In answer to a question from Alderman SIDNEY, Lord SEYMOUR said that he should take the dis cussion on this Bill at as early a day as possible. AFFAIRS OF CEYLON.—VOTE OF CENSURE ON THE GOVERNMENT. Lord JOHN RUSSELL wished to ask the lien. Member for Inverness•ihire whether he had made ar rangements with other Hon. Members who had notices on the paper relative to bringing forward the motion of which he had given notice ou the conduct of the Government in Ceylon? Mr. BAILLIE said, in the first place, he had to ex press his regret that he was not present on Friday night when the Noble Lord mentioned the subject. In answer to the question now pct, he must take the liberty of observing that the course which the Noble Lord had taken was ono of which ho bad great reason to complain. The Noble Lord had stated that the motion was one which ho should consider in the light of a vote of ecusure on the Government, and that therefore it was not his intention to bring forward his great financial measure until the measure was dis posed of, thus placing him (Mr. Baillie) in the invidi ous position not only of obstructing the business MARCH 18, of the country, but also placing the motion in the light of one of confidence and no confidence in the Government, at the time when the Noble Lord was perfectly aware that there was no other party in the country ready to take office. The question was one of long standing, and though the Noble Lord all of a sudden affected virtuous indignation, be must have ex pected it for some time, and indeed it was only in con sequence of the extraordinary course in refusing to produce the evidence which bad delayed the motion so long. The House must therefore admit - that he was not liable to the charge of obstructing the business of the country. He could perfectly well understand the difficulties the Noble Lord was placed in, and his anxiety to escape from those difficulties; and that, per haps, anticipating defeat upon this motion, he did not wish to have the trouble of pre paring those measures which it was his duty to bring before the country. The Noble Lord was, however, mistaken if he thought that he (Mr. Baillie) would be made the instrument of his being allowed to escape from the duties which the public exigency called upon him to perform. The course, therefore, which he should take would be to remove his motion from the notice book, reserving to himself the leave of bringing it forward again at a time when it would not render him liable to the charge of impeding public business. Lord JOHN RUSSELL had no reason to complain of the grounds on which the Hon. Member for Inverness shire had founded his motion, but. be had great reason to complain of the form in which that motion had been framed. The House would be at no loss to construe the object of the Hon. Gentleman, or of those who partook of his opinions in bringing forward the motion. He did not object to the motion, but he did object to the mode by which that motion had keen brought before the House. He did say that, on the present occasion, the motion of the Hon. Member was neither more nor less than to pass a vote of censure on the Government. There were reasons why this motion should be brought on, and he could perfectly understand why a vote of censure should be obtained against the Government, especially in a case in which the Secretary of State and the governor of one of the principal of her Majesty's colonies were concerned. What be had chiefly to com plain of was, that any member of a great party should bring a motion before this House under circumstances from which it was impossible for his opponents to meet it in a fair and candid manner.—(Hear, hear.) He was not prepared to say what course the Government would pursue, but he complained of the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Baillie) deferring his motion at a time when every ma terial was in his hands against Lord Torrington, a Peer of the realm, when his Lordship was present in this country.—(Hear, bear.) It was contrary to the prac tice of a great party to bring forward such a motion as this, and then when the party who brought it forward was perfectly aware of the influence which it must of necessity have, viz., the effect of a vote of censure upon the Government, to defer it. It seemed simply planned in wanton mischief, and he believed that the House would readily respond to his opinion, that a motion, in which the cha racter of a Noble Lord was implicated, and which charged him with gross and unnecessary cruelty, ought not to be entertained, or if entertained, ought not to be deferred to any future time for consideration.—(The Noble Lord, who had been loudly and repeatedly cheered, sat down amid loud applause.) , Mr. DISRAELI said that he must remind the House and the Noble Lord that this was no new question. They should remember that it was a question which had now been two years before the House, and that a Committee bad expressly declared for the publication of those papers, which were alike nesessary for the discussion of this question and for the satisfaction of the country. — (Hear, hear.) This was a matter of the greatest public interest and importance, and yet the Noble Lord desired them to legislate, in the absence of every document, through the evidence of which alone could they come at a right decision.—(Hear, hear.) His Hon. Friend the Member for Inverness-shire had applied at the Secretary's office, and had been told that the papers for which he applied had been returned to Ceylon, being necessary to be produced on the court-martial upon Captain Watson.—(Hear, bear.) All that he could obtain were copies of the documents, every one of which ought to have been laid on the table of the House a fortnight before. Now mark this. A copy of the evidence taken before the commis. siou could not be required by the court martial at Ceylon, because the authenticated copy of the evidence would not be admissible before the court.—(Hear, hear.) The court martial were in possession of the original evidence.—(Hear, hear.) What necessity, then, was there for sending back the' copy ?—(Cheers.) The reason, therefore, given by the Under-Secretary of State for sending back the copy was not only extraordinary, but unparalleled, and under all the circumstances, to say the least of it, most unsatis factory.—(Hear, hear.) And yet, under all these cir cumstances, the House having only just received the evidence taken before a Commit tee which sat two years— not yet being in possession of all the documents submitted to the consideration of the Committee, and the House haying just discovered a strange and suspicious cir cumstance with respect to the evidence taken by the Com mission sent out to Ceylon, the first Minister got up, and assuming a tone of virtuous indignation appealed to the House against what he called the unfair conduct of a great party.—(Cheers.) Now had the Minister been in the position which no doubt he wished to be, the House would have heard,nothing of this complaint—(Cheers) — for the Minister would have been the last man who could wish to come to a conclusion upon a great judicial ques tion of such importance as this in the absence of the necessary documents, and after such inexplicable conduct on the part of the department whose policy was attacked.—(Hear, hear.) He thought his Honourable Friend had taken that course which good sense and feeling alike dictated, and he for one had no objection to appeal to the verdict of the country as to Ins conduct on this occasion.—(Cheers.) .Sir GEORGE GREY said the House could scarcely overlook the remarkable difference thar existed between the arguments of the Honourable Gentleman the Member for Inverness-shire and that of his friend, his leader, and his protector on the occasion.—(A laugh.) He (Sir George Grey) was in the House when the Hoe Gentleman gave his notice in a clear and deliberate manner, and he heard him distinctly state that he should so submit it to the House on the 26th instant. (Hear, hear.) And h now, when his Noble Friend at the head of the Government asks him whether he in. tends to proceed with his motion on that day, the Hon. Gentleman does not say that he is not pre pared to submit his charge to the House, but he says he will not stand in the way of that im portant business which he holds to be the im perative duty of Ministers to bring before the House.—(Hear, bear.) That was what the Honourable Gentleman said himself, but what said his leader? Why he let the real reason out; he said they wore not pre. pared under present circumstances to bring the question forward.—(Hear, hear.) So then the Hon. Gentleman circulated a serious charge throughout the country against noblemen and the Government, and now it seemed it was not his intention to bring it for. ward.—(Cries of " Oh, oh.") Nay, he might go the length of saying that he dared not bring it on.—(Oh, oh, and cheers.) Now, as it was ajudic thisial ques tion they were to consider, he hoped at least was not a specimen of the spirit in which the inquiry would be opened and conducted.—(Hear, hear.) Mr. ROEBUCK, being much interested in the wel fare of the colonies, listened to this discussion with some degree of pain.—(Hear, hear.) The Honourable Gentleman the Member for Inverness-shire had, from the commencement of this transaction, expressed strong opinions with regard to the conduct of Lord Torring ton, and with greet credit to himself he had oarried the matter before a• Committee of the House, who had taken two years to investigate it.—(Hear, hear.) And now the Hon. Gentleman brought .a serious charge against Lord Torrington, and had given a formal notice of the day on which he proposed to go into it, but be cause the Noble Lord at the head of the Government considered the notice a vote of censure on his Govern ment, which, if established, would destroy the confidence of the House in the Administration, the Honourable Gentleman declined to press his motion for the pre sent.—(Cries of " Hear.") The conclusion which he deduced from all this was that the Government was weak, and because of that weakness the interest of the country and the colonies was to be sacrificed, and a serious charge allowed" to hang over the head of a Noble Lord recently', presiding over one of the colonies of England.—(Hear, hear.) Now, was it fair to delay this question?—was it fair to hold up Lord Torrington to the scorn and indignation of the country for an indefinite period under such a pretence as that which had been assigned in favour of the delay?—(Hear, hear.) The excuse put forth to justify this postpone ment was nothing less than .a pretence—a sham, and, as it related to a distinct criminal charge, it would be dis graceful alike to the House and the Government if those who proposed it were not pressed to go on with it at once. But of all the persons who were wrong none ware more so than the Honourable Member for Bucking hamshire—(Laughter)—who had shown he was totally unacquainted with the whole matter, and had brought forward some charge against the Colonial-office wholly unconnected with the matter in hand, and who fabrioated —if he might use the expression without dishonour —an accusation w hich of _th e Hon. Member for Inverness -shire never thought ad (Laughter.) It was quite clear that this war e / 2 s h e eers.) been adopted for party p ur p oses.—(Loud Let the people of this country understand all their great interests—colonies, finance, and o he a l nce portent matters of legislation—were all now in s t y gen. in consequence of the proceedings of some h tw y tlemen opposite.—(Hear.) Of this he t o u s e g la h o htstrhge:cei could be no doubt, that when a Ensilleslouse, who openly with a crime by a Member of t said he had evidence in proof of his accusatiolne.incohmemneoent justice—(Cheers)—ordinary.good toeli r n e g, P good faith, and fair play requi r e dat theahtargthee.—re should be no shrinking from little of the (Cheers.) He (Mr. Roebuck) circumstances, but whatev.er,f mu — t r y a n ... _ d might be his opinion as to the result of the charge i I came before a jury, he thought the accuser was boundlas aonfhohniesst he demanded it in the name ) ; - e la t : d t thought himself t t i t t th h e e (" Hear" from the Protectioeists Honourable Member who ropres justify that charge.—(Cheers ) I i t h e i n o r w ' he e s his . accuser of this man should now make his charge, and. if he could, endeavour to j And let no man treat this thatmattmerolLomigehndttl.— Let every one suppose for a own case.—(gear.) The Noble Lor d charged with no less a crime than m urder --( He ss ) — he _ WAS charged w i t h hs ,ing committed that murder when he repre sentedin Ceylon. If there were any great crimes that was one.—( ), He honoured a man for this country bringing a great crimina l t o J ustice,, but be could not say be h on oured that individual who made a grievous retitiedstidlllo. accusation, and who afterwards, he might say, skulked hand, the states of Holland, sinee their freedom from and from it. Papal yoke, had grown in wealth and civilizat on, Sir BENJAMIN HALL entirely concurred in all that had fallen from the Hon. and Learned Gentleman; offered a direct control.; to Spain. Look to England. The prosperity f and ( l u ib e e a r r ty ho o a f ro En s e o l t a )t n la d nd we o re we o d w . t i t n s g pro to sper t t li tl e and he would say, further, that he thought it utterly l t e o e a o r :La t il t on similar . cause. - In Switzerland the traveller could tell, impossible for the Noble Lord at this head of the Go . by the very aspect of the people, which canton was verntnent to pursue any other course than that which Roman Catholic and which Protestant. In Canada he had adopted.-(Cheers.) It must be admitted by impartial person that the motion of his Hen. Friend the and Protestant districts was most marked. In the every the distinction between Roman Catholic districts Member for Inverness-shire was nothing more nor le.s United States the same result prevailed. So in Mexico. so than a vote of censure on the Government, and with that in Ireland-(Hear) --and in other places where the eornriank., hanging over his h e ad how could the Noble Lord bring Catholic system existed. These examples were most st so. forward the financial arrangements of the Government? in ; but he did t mean or wish to attribute the c n o t n r : ea (Hear.) A governor of the colony and a p ee r o f t h e quences which nowese in Roman Catholic countries l at. to the peculiarities of the creed of Rome.- t II realm, as the lion. and Learned Member had stated, was charged with the crime of murder. He would ask why tributed them to the Ecclesiastical system of Romeaer..)- (Hear.) To no other cause creed he attribute the differences which the lion. Member gave notice of such a motion, and then he had pointed out. These examples strongly proved that allowed it to drop ? It would only be an act of fairness it was the duty of every Government who valued civil and and justice to bring the subject before the House of L arde, re li g i ou s liberty to see that the progress of the Romeo where that Noble Lord, as well as the Noble Earl at the Catholic system be checked.-(Hear.) With respect te head of the colonial department, might meet their ac- the introduction of the Papal bull into this country,' h d . -R; eaters man to man and answer the charge made against not consider that any portion of a bull which contemplate them, and where they might be enabled to g i ve a f a i r purely spiritual objects ought to be legislated againsmt.e_ If and legitimate account of the course of conduct they had purely spiritual matters were to be met, they muss: be : t ile a different way- not by legislation, but by renvoning me pursued. by the diffusion ofsound and Scriptural educati .n.- (Hear.) The matter then dropped. ECCLESIASTICAL TITLES BILL-ADJOURNED But the Papal movement had an aspect of and a ‘,„,,„ DEBATE. very different kind. lie affirmed it vas an aggression, an aggression upon those principles which ought to Mr. Astuteness resumed the debate on the second be respected and kept sacred by every Roman Catholic.- 1 reading of this Bill. He said that the Right Ho- (Hear, hear.) The very basis of the compact of 1829 n see! nourable Baronet the Secretary of State for the Home that the Pope was to have no temporal power ietel!, Department, in moving the second reading of this country. He could not regard the introduction of the . P o lL ... a l Bill, had professed that he would clear the ground bull otherwise than as an infringement of that P ri a n n e d lPl the for the House to come to a proper understanding (Hear, hear.) The sole object of the bull,introduce the canoe on the subject.-(Hear, hear.) So far, however, establishment of a hierarch, was to teferewithte from clearing up any of the difficulties which sur- law, which was, in reality, intended to t in r temporal action of the laws of this country.. - rounded ey..-- (iler') avowale arb'y) rounded the Bill, the Right Hon. Baronet had kicked up ')'here needed no other proof than the distinct . such a dust that he had made the ground much darker and more difficult. Ile thought, however, that it would Cardinal Wiseman in his pastoral address. Cardinal Wise man stated be conceded that the opponents of the Bill had since that " All that we plead against is, the adoption in anY mea* time cleared the ground of a great deal-in the sure of that preposterous cant of the aee, that the Secular first place, they had cleared the ground of the Hon. power, as such, is bound by its duty to Go% to extend Baronet himself for the apace of ten days, and since the toleration to all religions, irrespective of the ns©• c a l y rc t u h m a i restoration of himself and his colleagues they had cleared stances which may attach to each overate case. To e every man has a right to adopt s the ground of at least three-fourths of the Bill ; they had cleared it of anything which could ever pleases is untrue; to say, also, that the tamtemporalthet' props- . never called upon to put obstacles in the , have imparted any shadow of consistency to it.butviy it is perfectly The Noble Lord at the head of the Government had trueati o that religio ns Englishe r ro lawrs , i s also professes untrue to • tolerate Us, and on openly avowed that the opinions of his former life wereon ourindefeasiblerights as the _only that ground, as well as blunders and misconceptions, a nd that the present Bill true Church, while we meddle not with the claims of the sell a religiousorcareed_ses.rbies was founded on an entire change of his opinion. They sects about us, we take our stand." had also exposed to the public view the paltry strings It was suggested it could be only in one of the two following that pulled the puppet of intolerance and bigotry. forms :- and shown how the same strings that pulled the puppet's would be head up were ready to pull it down again. lie did tution, which would supply all wants, but w ii, as a special not wish to refer to the erratic fights of indi- necessarily complicated and voluminous, and, the real and " Either the Holy See must issue another and full consti viduals, but when he heard them accompanied r p o ro n vis l io t re c m o ul o d f n h e e ces c sarily be ternto o ra a rl , once extended. to h E u n rctl an n d lust with the cheers of the House of Commons aha il L e th e olic Church t in 'be could scarcely forbear commenting upon them. its social position; and thisgprevision would be final. fast. He referred to the speech of the lion. Baronet the Mem- in order to alopt this second and mere natural expi:eleee.t bar for Tamworth, and as ho had heard that the lowest one condition was necessary, and that was, the Cathe l l o w n ; Jacobins were the Gamaliels at whose feet the Hon. have a hierarchy. The canon law is inapplicable Iv Baronet delighted to sit, he hoped that from that source vicars apostolic." it should so far as compatible with the lion. Member drew his matter as well as his manner, So, therefore, when Rome was considering how er . _ elig a The first question to be decided was, whether the art of the accede to the application made to it, it decided on eel' canon law. Pope was an aggression, expressed in insulting language • hierarchy solely with the view of introducing the .. _ eald g ive secondly, whether it had been a temporal or a spiritual If that canon law was introduced, he asserted it w e i t h aggression ; the dly, supposing it to be an aggression, was there reasonable ground for the Popo to believe that it was the Court of Rome power to interfere in this countryt ei_ter-ii-ie temporal matters.- (Hear, hear.) He assarted wereee'plenty an act offensive to the British Government, or one which, of the canon law was n o antiquated law. on the contrary, was not only innocent but acceptable •; fourthly, if the Pope had erred in the conclusion, whether of mo ern prows of this, and he need onlylrbeeferar te,trhhei:`,,J,ll,lla Canonicum," published in 1831, at Rome, in wife ; h vi t to mak e an asserted of Reiffensteul that the Pope had a rsge_ o _, se v icar the relations of the Government with the See of Rome were ecclesiastical constitution for the whole world, : f d. or were not such as to warrant that error- in a word, whether udging or the error was with the country or with the Pope ; and fifthly, of Christ, had a supreme power, if necessary: , J e t was still assuming it to be an aggression, whether the House was disposing of all temporal goods of all Christians con fined of opinion hat it was an act which called for such a vindi- clear, therefore, that the object of hierarchy was sa legislature cati nas that proposed by her Majesty's Government, and to temporal things. It was right, therefore, for the . _ s on w hi c h which was likely to lead to such a serious consummation. of the country in such a case to uphold the principle s (gear.) With regard to the first proposition he (Mr. Moore) freely the Emancipation Act was granted, and to introinterfere ectiee o f conceded that the act of the Pope was an aggression- The essential feature of the hierarchy was the e ,:" it ou ght a spiritual aggression of a most decided character; the canon law, and as that was so ebjectionaoleemption of but then he maintained that the Pope was dis- to be met by fitting legislation. Then thee titles was undoubtedly an evasion of the Quee.? aright' 1,1 tinctly in his right, as every man, native and was the exclusive right of the Sovereign t . conf t e alien, had a right to promulgate his opinions when suchl power of opinions were tolerated by the State. In religion, which the Pope had, therefore, no right to assume ' done. Th. lived upon persecution, aggression was an inevitable neces- conferring titles on British subjects as he had e indee d, to city. Without aggressions the world would never have had main objection to the Government measure, " an 'othing WO Christianity any more than persecution. The question, then, any legislation at all on this question, was, that n that t imes was, could such aggression be opposed successfully by penal to be feared front the acts and spread ' of Popery t_` . .. vr 0 itt laws? That the Pope exercised spiritual authority over one- had changed-and that Popery was not the assertion,ram it a , it third of the people of these kingdoms could not be denied. former ages. But ho felt surprised at this actiany That the Papal power was imperium in imperio, he would not was perfectly clear that Rome had only not been t unapt ' stop to dispute; but he would maintain that it would be as mischievous in all ages and places, because oldw fetter reasonable to pass an Act of Parliament against the influence due restraint. It was said that the Bill wo 1 .. t h e y of the moon on the tides as against the immaterial and religious liberty. They who argued so argued ' as certain powerful authority of the head of the Catholic Church. Ar- were the great advocates of that principle. lie was, atholiel rogance had been imputed to this act of the Pope - spiritual that such views were not the views of Roman d id generally. Many large bodies of Roman Catholics arrogance ; but the Turk on the banks of the Euphrates entertain that view. In the .Rambler, a Roman Catiohioolif. üblication, he found a statement, which, in hi° ° P e t hin not approach in the smallest degree to the arrogance of the English people on the subject of religion. In tact if all the la pride of all the fallen angels had entered into their souls, more truly represented the views of Roman Catholic be they could not, in his (Mr. Moore's) opinion, exhibit a the statements made by Ilon. Members in that House• Bu t .este greater amount of arrogance in that respect ; and in proof of maintained that no man had a right to bring religious liefeae, this he referred to the address of the prelates of the English into contact with civil liberty ; and he contended that iii,..; Church to the Queen, wherein language the most illiberal, were the best defenders of religious liberty who took ee" ..t (led would flow from in what had taken place. the most labouredly and grossly insulting, had been em- that civil liberty was not infringed. He was satisfied 1!,_1,, The rigni. ployed in speaking of the religion of one-third of her Ma- g •nci le to act upon this jesty's subjects. What was the insult or aggression Pl. P instance was prinsipire obi n of one head of a Church to those of a whole Kier- With respect to the measure, he did not think it suthcie . te . archy, whom the Catholics were condemned to pay for comprehensive. He thought a condemnation of the t u lar duction of the bull of the Pope ought to have been inserted anathemising them. In spiritual aggression as well as insult the Catholics were therefore the debtors of that naltYP and a declarations prohibiting such an act, under pc _ e hierarchy ; and though they were obliged to imprison for the future. Believing, however, that the Bill had beer s their pride in their own hearts, it was not the less strong for introduced in a spirit of sincerity, ho was prepared to giVe I biding its time, and certainly they would not forget their his support. debt. The next question he should consider was, whether Mr. E. B. ROCHE said, that the Honourable Gentlem an this aggression was temporal or spiritual in its character. who had just sat clown, had served up same of the stale doe* He asserted it was not the former] and he had not been able, trines of Exeter Hall.-( Hear, hear.) He had said that lrr in all that was said or written on the subject, to discover a land was an example of the baneful effects of the Ronan clear description how it became so, and still less a proof that Catholic religion, but he should rather say it was an exare such it was. The Noble Lord (the Member for London) had pie of the baneful effect that was growing up under their made a long speech in inridiwn, quoting the words of Cardi- Protestant laws which were supported by Protestant baY °- nal Wiseman's letter, " We govern," &c., as an invasion of nets. Ireland, instead of being a stigma upon the Bol' the prerogative of the Sovereign; but with the exception of Catholic faith, was a disgrace to Protestants, because le a ' tu. this wretched perversion of that ecclesiastical letter, that or was governed entirely in opposition to the 'feelings of ti e. any of the speeches which preceded or followed it did n t country. He held this measure to be an infringement of the define that charge, or contain any evidence in support of it. Emancipation Act. The Act was the charter of Roman Ca He (Mr. Moore) maintained that the whole case got up on tholic liberties, which they were attempting to invade. lira e this ground was disingenuous ; for all assumption of temporal Bill did invade those liberties, and therefore he would opPos: authority on the part of the Pope had been over and over it. The first clause of this Bill, he asserted broadly. was ''' disclaimed. In truth the entire argument of the Noble Lord great an oppositions to the endowment of the peahen bill and those who supported him in that respect was the same as Church as either , f the two clauses expunged. This Bill WI had been used by the old ladies of this come ry at any time a retrograde movement, and going back to the legislation e. within the last hundred years ; and nothing more or less past ages. During the debates respecting the Catholic enattneL than what the Noble Lord himself had so often scorned and pation, in 1829, the Duke of Weeington stated that in 17 .'' e derided at any time within the last quarter of a century. He a law was passed in Ireland to prohibit any Catholic pel!hee (Mr. Moore), however, looked upon the best reply to the from assuming titles ; but it was repealed in 17 93 ' 3 Noble Lord's arguments-if such they could be called -on effect of the Bill was found so intolerant and unjust that 1_ this point, to be the statement of the Noble Lord the Mem- was repealed, and up to 1.29 the priests and prelates wro: her for Bath, respecting the organisation of the spiritual body tree to assume any titles they pleased. In 18a9 e Cat d u at designat d W esleyans in this country. The fact was, and it lice consented, and he thought very improperly, to aban 0 , was well known in England, that Cardinal Ni iseman no their liberties to a certain extent, and not to assume more meant that he should govern Middlesex temporally places bolos is to Protestsnt bishops. . eow 0 ,0%7;0 than that he should govern the whole country. The Hon. called u ,on to go hack to the legislation of 1793. That NN b e and Learned Member for Oxford had th own overb - ,ard that legislating upon a principle of which they aught There co.rse assertion of temporal power, and taken refuge in a ashamed, in the middle of the nineteenth century. , ~„., were fine-drawn distinction intelligible to no one but himself; and was another reason for him to oppose the Bill. r e'Llee it roe yet for such a distinction the whole country was to be torn attempting to impose an Act which they called Ireland,ci it in pieces. The Hon. Member for the University of Uxrord pensive Act; but as it could not be extended to _sent urged that the Church of Rome claimed authority over every was a delusion upon the people at large. If GoY", ll ' the a baptised Christian. But was not this claim made by every eaten 'ed this Bill to Ireland, he asked them ue e w e etur- Church ? The Hon. and Learned Member for the city of they were prepared to carry et tut? Would they: n og , Oxford might say, no; but an Hon. Member for the Uni- to appeal to a Catholic jury? They had b .i _, d i,. titleser: varsity of Oxford said, yes; and he said moreover that and dissatisfaction enough in Ire and, and li e' law ' every bishop in the Established Church claimed this jurisdic- satisfaction was increased by maintaining bad week Lion. Thus, then, were the bishops of the Episcopal Church upon the statute-book. This Bill would go into the e told in this country, the bishops of the ace esiastical Church in list, wet they were therefore enc, uraging Oa _ eon , Scotland, and the bishops of the garrison Church in Ireland spirit of dissatisfaction. Upon them would rest the reeVe, claiming all the dissenters, members of she Church of sibility.- (Hear.) A bull similar to that introduced into 'f ee Scotland, and Roman Catholics; but did the Dissenters, country had formerly been sent to Sydney, and whenastrios the Presbyterians, or the Roman Catholics care an atom Protestant bishop t complained, Lord Lo t rd Stanley, nse 1 c d r twalnywaffair of for this claim. The Roman Catholics, he could speak for Colonial SrnernCreenatfy,_ d How then could they turn round now ane them, certainly protested against the bishops ef the Esta- the G h o e ve bull really interfered with the Queen's supremacy blished Church putting their hands in their pockets; but, as e years of discretion believed it. He believed that there, regards their claims to their souls, they regarded it with the 8h y e did t not believe that any man in this country, arrived at most perfect indifference. The argument of the Hon. and Learned Member for Oxford, that the hierarchy would be d it to this spirit of intolerance and bigotry we l e e w th a e s In this country a p'uritanical spirit of bigotry, which , in many cases, had been got up by Protestant bishops, an,.. e e followed by the canon law, and that under the canon law i the Pope might depose the Sovereign and dissolvethea Ie- was bowing made them now attack this unfortunate Dr. Wiseman Te glance of the subject, was as absurd as that which . alleged i. this country. Now they were going to de another *W ir e d that absolution would be denied to all who oasect Archbishop''' of thing, to extend it to Scotland, where no one admitt the Oueen's supremacy. There was to be a clause intr°.l; antics, in the same manner as was done by the, hierarchyre gardto the i e a n i a n had drdbineand the canon duced to meet the case of the Episcopalian bieheP i a 1 0. e uences heel Scotland, who were in the same position as Dr. Meli a.° ill in il e author Ireland iii ir lhere . asebscoluationealthough Ireland, and why not meet the case of the bishops "•,,,. law was in force there ; but none of the occurred ;while as regarded the refusal might say, devoted to land. If they did not, it would be monstrous iejest,lee_ the people of that country were. hcaanonglaw or the bull in They did things in Ireland, which, it done in this couniared: forof trhonetoSriciecoa,nrdi law. their clergy, no one cared for the ar, i afraid to proceed would make the very hair of their heads to stand o‘qoa Coma Domini, and no one was,abov e t truth, he (Mr. Moore) That was justice to Ireland. They said to them , -sore against the priests. In boises who woule not get a Irish Papists, you shall have nothing. We will placedTiow believed that the only suitor the clergy was the British chains upon you." Ile wanted to have that exelei ca e ke verdict in an Irish court against ainceseded with t he present Bill. they ex ,mpted bishops in Scotland and proposed to n d i t he Government in case they ) ' re s irituel power, the Attorney- the very same thing penal in Ireland. He believloa to As regarded the question of P more than was exercised by bishops 13,11 was introduced by the Noble Lord and e gten , be d General sail it s o with the insult the House Ireland,for the of bolsteringthe Estab'lD eel • and that . . purpose - in partibus p wa shv , fora state of thiegs so described by Church in Ireland. That Church was based cn gnu a e g ood had nothing to do. l ett TIA. - sa id of the Crown, the country was to be tern was a badge of conquest, and he thought the it wss the first law officer u estion was, whether the aggression, reason ter voting against the Bill altogether. support the to pieces. The next q tof t a Pope, was ine which he had b •people that Billnecessary, to uestiou if such it was, on the par 3 some ~., _s rai hi r q , would be otlensive to the Government, or, Protestant Church in England. , Doll t reason to conceive wo tie itself and not unac , b let u f ne then said,' stant on the other hand, n in - "en the Noble Lord at the headcePta le was mooted, and respectable old genti coeloy the rest; .. On this point . . of the admit the Catholics. or you will I s' dinen wee Dover em. pads a confession so very humiliating that Church l h " an amen _ .. ‘ei . ga toget er. At that tittle , be Duke of " nment had m Inot it shout( press on the notice of the proposed similar to tit , present Bill, but t it e ve re he ( etr. e' oore) 'e Lord had been accused ofas aware b duces " House. The Nob making Va- lington did not support it, and said he w but Ws in . oa the subject at issue • in 1834 and in 1845 security to the Established Church, Eameciliatiee rious statements on ts directly contrary to his present course of ac- ti plunder those who were opposed to . the ed to t"- -statemen considerable hesit •"P" of t ° ' after cons atton the Nobl e Lord ad- Act. Earl Malmesbury, who had been lion ; and accounting for his conduct this Act vils a dis mitted them , . on occasion by Emancipation Act, said, now that that s of A . the had now changed ins mind. lie (Mr. Moore) he would not consent to the introduction of clauseceritY „ ey ing that whato ee .1,0 however,appealed co • confidently even to those Honourable qualifying character, as he considered they g were l'e a Members who were l most opposed to him, whether this an- to the Church. lie (Mr. Roche) had s bown e _ anc i p etso _ ewer would be be das sa ti s f ac t or, y ot h er t h an ( bpi°. opinions of men who had been opposed to the eene.ever h ' is matic. The lion. Membe r then referred to th e letter of the Act. He believed that the present Bill woued n ; __ ia t en; H o n. Member for South N ott i ng h ams hi re, an d conclud e d by been introduced but for the spread of TrUtarta.le,'.ie dan ge et contending that the Pope had reasonable groun ds to suppose country. But the danger of ,the l'ope was t no ~"!.. do g that his measure, if it did not o b ta i n the sanction, would at which alarmed the Noble Lord; it was that . o s t a tee' ve , t h e re, least command the silence of h er M a j es t y ' s Government. from within the Church itself, snit which was l e , h e e ' y e i ,d all But if there had b een any m i sconcept i on on this point in the he said, to the very brink of the precipice. , ''', f . whom he m i n d of the Pope, the state of the relations between the heard a great deal of the Rev. Mr. Bennet l s r ai - d they must British Cabinet an d the Papal Court were suc h as to render wished to speak with great respect. Ito was bere not others it perfectly excus a bl e . T h e re was no coun t r y in the world screw him down to the rubric; but w re t e But he would w here such a monstrous fiction was maintained as that the they must screw up to it? - (Hear, bean o / co . , t that in the bead of the religion of one•thiri of the inhabitants-which call the atten , ion of the Noble Lord to , h th el al, Trinffe religion was admitted by the State - should be ignored by the Chapel Royal, St. James's, and the ...eat ) ee wfly . i n w h,c law. But it wa s no t unparalleled in the history of England ; College, Dublin, the rubric was violated by t o " -se 1 Deember thee for ages after France had cast out the English power, the the egnmunion table was placed. The, -J an n e," PraYert Sovereigns of En g l an d c l a i m ed the title of Kings of France read extracts from " Stevens's Bo k et Ages the rubryto also. At th e p resen t mome nt Hon. Members distinctly for the purpose of showing that in malty had not one aina,l?, swore that the P o p e h a d no spiritual a , ,thority in this realm, was either omitted or altered. They ba full of the Moat when the con t rary was we ll known to them to be the fact. edition of their prayer book which was not own thee t ha ss t And an inter nec i ne s truggle was almost provoked for the glaring inaccuracies. NOW, he mad I s i b is Roy al Hig luic e. maintena nce e f a f a l s ehood so arrogant. The Hon. Member there was a prayer book patronised n y _ _r en bis bep t, then referred to the debate on the Bill for diplomatic rela- Prince Albert, by three archbishops a .n d tbyeficfheopei itoytr. lions with Rome, and asserted that the Noble Lord at the in which it was stated, that neithe a r i h I TI 'Trinity College. )°. _ head of the G overn ment was laughing in the face of the St. James's. nor in the Ceapeldito.y 'tertrl acYcording to W. House wh en h e made his statement in respect of the Papal lin, could the communion be 1 innathamtlsfact, there svas not , ."°:°. aggression. It was not the division of the c untry into die- ruble or the statute law; okntthat was not full of inaccuraiii. cases that made the aggression, but it was the people them- edition of their Pms or I 1 aeainst roceeding with his e ) !,,, t wise selves wh o had fancied the aggression. It was nut a proper Ile warned the Seble .ore , , p d toes mast be prepared to nice . _ of vindication of the law to pass enactments that were not to If Mini,ters persevetrere,and._ . (Hear, hear.) The wit he be carried into effect, or were to be carried into effect in ,ne every opposition in . I met their religion to be interfered weee".. part of the kingdom and not in the other. This con se was Ireland would not P lied been true to their religion, note !ties more degrading to our national honour than anything else For centuries theyru ion, and they would be true to it s till.. t tee_ that could be imagined. - (Hear.) standing persecution, blessings the people possessed Ives the:r.;`,, pe r , sure (who was indistinctly heard at first) said, of the ;greatest dear tothem, d ' terference ,P.! this`measure had been treated, during the debate, as said, it • gion-it was very an any in „...., but e religion was not only disgraceful to theinsent ee , „ ‘,ar, was but of little consequence to this country, and us if it that and a disgrace in the eyes of the world. - hear' hay merely referred to a speculative opinion. He was sa isiied stign 7 They would be slaves, and worse than slave s ' 1 • e to this was a mistake. Wherever the system of Rome pre- hear. such I no ted to laws_ lie (Mr. Roche) bad n ha d ero. veiled, the liberty and prosperity of a nation dclined submite the irritation which the proposed measure oltase wherever that system was checked, liberty and prosperity incredas. i Ireland but he warned Ministers that the c Le i flourished.- (Hear, hear.) Look to the varions states own- duce it . ; 'on in tjv to create rebel!). ~ Is ble they were taking was the way ing the sway of Rome. Spain had sunk to a contempti tr (Hear hear)—and he feared it they Pete "' cowl y— , rank among nation 3 wader the sway of Rome. an th© other . t 1851. ' AN