The Sun. — London, England, 1814-05-24 00:00:00

of De wool elnAy Itar e talon plae-e -(Hear, hear 1) - -e--He did not wish to say anything harsh or severe, but he thought several circum stances in the case of that person were calculated Oeeitt. sespiciow. lie had resided within the toles of the King's Bench prison, whence he had_ ahsConded, 'leaving his bail liable for the debt ; and both at Sunderland and. Edinburgh he had t9zhitned a felgoed name The whole of the argu ments of the 'Hon. Gentleman rested upon the as= snm.••ioe, that the Secretary of. State had mise conducted himself in die execution of his duty._ The Police-office Of 13°w-street could not go on tiur some of the arguments used ; if articles were evert, for instance, for preservation.— Wfiat' would t i tle House say, if the Secretary of state 'Lehi, taken up a dangerous person, and e by leaving all his papers, 'reelected all the gratinuls of proving their suspicions; or of profiting by inforunation ? , The first house in the kingdom mieitt he searched; if an Alien resided therein. Every demand of Berenger was acceded to in a reasonable time. He was apprehended on the Bth of April, he tape to town on the 12th, and' on the 15th he applied for the admission of his Solicitor ,and friends, and for leave to write in the' newspapers. On the 16th his Solicitor was informed ; that there was no objection to access ; and he saw Berenger without the slight est restraint. On his application for leave to e p o .. suit his papers, he was - told ,t,hat his Solicitor might see them and take copies of them, and that: the originals shbalti tie preserved:to he produced in Court, if - tequh•ed. Berenger expressed his thanks as to the notes, and his opinion that they were equal in value to the originals. When brought op to plead, be could not at first find hail, and was detained. It might -be regretted tihie Ile was in a worse sitnatioothan others; but while a mats was amenable to the Alien Laws, that mus t be the case. Those persons indicted, who were , Members of Parliainent; were not ap;drehended Or pat to hail, on account 'if their privilege. Sup pose Berebger had been in Newgate for debt, and • indicted for some offence, coold he have got out to seek for witnesses ? He was in one of the best roOnis in Newgate, about a third of the size of that room they were now sitting in —(A laugh.)— No man 'had been introduced to him whom he did not wish to see : and none refused but at his own klesire. The persons from Rochester did not see him. As to his clothes, be i lead the full accommo- • dation of his linen. He preferred staying in New gate to being elsewhere, and complained of no thing. It only lately occurred to him that that Ho u se was the most convenient place for discuss ing his claims. He Was told - , in answer to his memorial of the 10th of May, that every thing would be returned to him, except what might be necessary to the ends of justice. He- received his 1861. though not in the same notes which were taken tram him. WOuld any sensible mom give back to an apprehended pervn notes which, though they might be Used for a different ()hied - , might yet be material, for public justice, and the destruction of which might prevent important evidence ? There was no question of sustenance, medicine, or counsel, For he had she supply -. within three days atter he asked it. As to the matter.of right, he might try it. There was nothing ,re-- taieed but the original notes, a telescope, a !me-. ket-book, and a few trifles. No ground whatever Cad been shewo for the present motion. Mr. ABERCROMBIE had no sympathy , for Mr. Bereoger ; but maintained that the practice under the Alien . Act had been frequently productive of vexatious proceedings', - and a denial of justice.— He loAed to a farther discussion of the subject, should a renewal of that Act be proposed. Par liament, in passing the Act, contemplated only the giving power to Griveinment to commit for the detention, or transportation from this coun try, of dangerous foreigners. COM the Right lion. Gentleman state, that Berenger's departure tvould have been hdangerous to .the State ? The 11101111.1tt it aprarf:d that these WRS 110 such (lan per, the Secretary hail no right to detain a man. lie wished to know where the power was given, in such cases, to seize opOn' and hold an indivi dnal's - papers. 'The Act was never intended as a mode of getting at evidence for other purposes. 11 w a s not stated that what was detained was ma-' terial to the State. There might be circumstances under which he should' he disposed to give all confidence to the Government ; but these were not the times, when there seemed to be no.cojin try to which Berenger could go, wherein - he co ld& do us any injury. —(Hear, hear !). In -Col case, a ground for detention was made Clear : but 'Compared With his, Berenger's 'was, a case of great aggravation. Had not the Alien_ Act been enforced, would the 'prosecutors have had 'their evidence against him ? The notes returned were as good as any others for the butcher and baker ; but there Was all the difference in the world between them to Irerenger. The identifi-, cation of I3erenger might rest on his being seen, through his being in custody. The Act gave no ithority, tenseize papers : if it were deficient, Ministers should have come to Parliament to get it amended ; - but they had no right to set up their practice as-law. All theicircurnstances of the case should be considered. Bereuger had resoled here long, and in' 1804 received licence to go tO any part of the kingdom. This made the case pecu liar, and rendered it necessary to make it mani fest that theme was ample ground for detaining bitn. Now he must go to trial, with-the assertion of the Secretary of State.that'his remaining here was dangerous to the country ; that he was the ( veiny of Ligland e or in the pay of foreigners'.— (Hear I)—Was this right ? Air. B. BATFWRST said, he had argued not -merely on the Alien Act, hut on the general au thority of the Secretary of State, which might be oef- -,elson why nothing particular was stated in the A. Mr. Alderman SMITH bore testimony to Beren - gees omfortablc . accommodation i n N e • vgat d,' , 'which he himself admitted. -Sir SAmtni.r ROMILLY thought the - Secretary of State had no power under the Act to.seize papers in such a 'case, nor iinder,iiisgeneral authority. Taxtrau e dinary powers wervested in him at a time of alarm and .dangtr, by which, without any cri minal charge, he could appiehend, detain, or *end away kite: l 4ller:: ; ado many,- he 'believed, had becn so dealt with, xvithout positive infor.-_ tp . eimlen:;Ce Aral to be .This question was confontitied with that of a criminal charge. Were this power to be e . twi-eised,on a mere asstiMptioii, it might too tar; for sunny foreigners might become obnoxious for various privAte reasons. ti WA:s alarming such a wide extent of con struction should-be given to the Act by persons in office. . , . Mr..PETEn MOORE never heard of itcrenger till the hoax. It seemed-suppoied that his apprehen sfon would afford a chic to the discovery of the, parties concerned in that ho'qr. The object Of the Alien Act was %N ell kmiwn c Talleyrand, the pre sent French Minister, was sent out of this coun try undei\ it. Did not the Secretary of State open Berenger's trunks at his office, and send a message' to the Stock Exchange people, who were hoaxers themselves, to come and• inspect the papers Mr. 11. ADDINGTON never heard of any such truuks being at the office. No such message was sent. Mr. C. WY NNE 8;141, the point of authority might he, made a grave question It the ori&nal measure were wrong, there would be a ground of action. It was not illegal to make use of papers for the furtherance cif public justice, however those p pers might have been conic by ;' eyei) though the original taking were blameable.. . livniu admitted that he saw no parti= cidar dan , 4er in divulging the reasons of Beret:- ger's apprehensioh to a Secret tortunittee. • Ater WORTL2Y COIIC6Ved that it would be inconvenient for Part.iinnent to interfere in cases where the Secretar:i of State assured them. there was cansc for the arrest. Sir J. Nuw.poiT,"cotzld not conceive any incon venience from, t.,. precedent, 7IY this was a time Of no dangrr, and the Act was abo . ut to expire. My. WILBERtgIICE saw do ,ufficient ground for theppointweat of a Couirnittee, or for suppos ing . .lat Ministers had pot exercised a soimd dis cretion. B.Luts'rsrl.t. spoke slimly against the ap pointment of a Committee. Air. Bart-,11%i was surprised to hear it stated, that the interference, of Parname= would be in convenient, tn defiance of the only case of this nature—that of Mr. Colville.. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL vindicated-the obser vations he had made on the, subject on a former n;ght, and had not, as stated by an lion. Gentle man (Mr. Whitbread), endeavoured to puzzle•a, simple conntsy Magistrate. Did the Honourable Gentleman mean to charge the Secretary of'State as having acted from any improper motives ? The honour, of the persons concerned was enough to rebut such a charge, and to silence any such sus picion. The seizure was for reasons arising out. ,of the Alien Act. Ile would neither be at Earle in the country, nor sent out of it. 'Would .' it be convenient, if this was- the case, to make a disclosure of the circumstances ? It was the duty of the Magistrate, at the same time, if lie understood that these papers might contri but to the administration of public justice, to -keep them, and not give them up. Cases of this sort frequently occurred in courts. of law. lie nientionedacase of t wo' people of Bedford, which he had no d'oubt the lion. Member knew something of, 'in which a document was brought in proof of a claim, and failing, it was impounded, and the person, on this. , evidence, tried afterwards for forgery. If the Secretary of State got accidentally papers of rhis sort in his possession, he was bound to detain them. -tic denied that any person had been admitted to Mr. Berenger for the purpose of 'putting interrogatories to him, and averred that be was at .liberty to refuse seeing any body. Mr. IIoRNER was ip favour of the motion. 'Nil'. C. GRANT SpOke - agairrit it The Sor.RATotiGENEIAL hoped that nothing he had said on the farmer day of debate %vould injure either of the parties.. He vitidicAted the Secretary of State from the imputation of having exceeded his powers, and argued that he was in duty bound to detain De Berenger'S papers. -- Lord MILTON.--If any of the Hon. Gentlemen, on the other side of the House could assure him that this subject should be matter of inquiry next Session of Parliament, he should not be unwilling to negative the motion. Mr. ADDINGTON, in answer to a question, whe ther any com►nuuication had taken place with the Stock Exchange, stated, that an application had been made to-the Secretary of State's Office, that the papers should not, be parted with, as they might be necessary for the' furtherance of- public justice. The Chairman of the Stock Exchange cninmittee had also sent to the Secretary of State, wishing him to undertake the prosecution, which he declined. .Mr. WHITBREAD replied at some length. He ridi§ided the idea, that the delusion attributA to the Petitioner could have produced any disastrous effect upon the proceedings of the Confederacy op the Continent; and anini3dvertcd with peculiar point and humour upon what lie called the exten— sive legal learning and oracular authority of the Attotney-General the accuracy of whose opinion. upon any question of law, the liberality of whose sentiments upon any great constitutional topic,or the susceptibility of whose feelings upon any appeal to humanity, could -ifever fora moment be doubted. The tioise then divided, when there were,-- For the 'Motion Agihist it Majurity against the Motion -125 CORN. Mr. litisKtsSON, in the absence of the Chancel lor- of the Exckequer, vho was indisposed, moved 'that the Corn Imp Oft Biil might pass thrqugh•the Committee merely pro forum, without discussion. Export to-morrow. On the motion for the third reading of the Corn Ex'port Bill, Mr: RosE mowed, that a rider might be added to the Bill, enabling the King, with the advice of hiS Privy Council, to suspend the exportation of corn when circumstances should require it. He supposed that the Hon. 13am:et would have no oppos;tion to make to this clause; for he was. ,as sured, that, without it, his Right Hon. Friend, now absent (the Chancellor of the Exchequer), .would have voted against the third reading Sir IL PARNELL said, he had every reason to believe that the Chancellor of the Exchequer Would have voted for the third reading. Mr. Ross then Proceeded to ask what must be cite ‘' - he oe24fil'e, 'if in timC 4 grtat city they should sCe the Can carried Out of the cciVtiti.y. A system which had stood' for four hundred years; and was force tip to this koitr, was ro be entirely overturned, and on such evidence as Parliament had never before act ed upon since its Wry commencement, lie had doiie his duty, and challenged the possibility of imputing to ftim any improper motives. Sir Jot:: 1.`417.-WroRT observed, that in' 180 it was advkvd, as now.. that the King should have the power of suspending the e.portation front I:c - land, and it was predicted that such a tweasurc would soon he, necessary. _He had then answered; as he would now, that the Minister should take upon himself the responsibility of any rA quilted al terations, and Should then come to Parliament for ' an, indemnity. The discretionary power now sought to be given was had, inasmuch as on Leery fluctuation of priec' it would goad on the people to importune the Government. - As to the motives of Gentlemen, he supposed they were equally honest on both sides : for his own part he would not support the \measure, ir he did 'not believe - that it would coutribitte to equal and re , ular prices. • Mr. DAYiEs GIDDY SkipliOrtell - 'clause, * be cause though he thought agrictd I re should lac encouraged (o.the utmost, yet it was still amore important thing to avert impeluliug famine. General .):'otinFs nurvt.d, that the disCussion might he postponed till Thui'sday, because several AlentberS had gone away, on an tnidersianding that this Bill would not be carried through to night , 'Mr. Rosc mach' a few further remarks against the Dili, but was celled to 'order by \1 r. Wynne. Sir 1-1. PARNELf..ttlotialit the Bill should not have beeti sulfered to come. to this stag-z before the Right Hon. Gentleman gave any hint of the nature of his clause. Mr.Cßosi..7 said, he had been. desired by his Right Hon. Friend (the Chancellor of the Exche (luer) to delay the clattse : that. his Right Hon. Friend had corrected his manuscript, and tilt the contrary had been this night asserted, he believed_ that he would have supported the clause.. Mr. LUSI-11:24T0N felt it his duty to state, that the Chanctllor of the Exchequer would, if pre v t i...., sent, have voted ag;:iint.th s claoe. He then ar gued in support p 1 the Billt : • 'Alr. NVi,, sTE ßN.said, no W s Were so beneficial to the farmer as those whit i encouraged him to look beyond the home market. Should anv ex traordinary circumstance arise, it would be better, for the Minister to act upon his responsibility. Air. BRAND, though not prepared to agree to the proposed clause, woqld have no objection to one which should.fix - the price 4 which exporta— tion should cease. . . Mr. CANNING strongly reprobated such au amendment as that proposed by the Hon. Gentle . - mail, as it tended to convert a Bill of pure prin ciple into one of mere regulation. It was totally_ at valiance with the preamble and whole object of the Bill, which was to allow a free trade with out any limit. As, to the - douse proposed by his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Rose), he had no insu peoble objection to it ; but he thought it entirely useless. It. was merely pointing out to Govern ment to dolhat which they must do, of course, if the exigency of circumstances demanded. It was better, there ore, to leave such matters altogether to the discretion and responsibility of the Minis 7 ter. He again protested most strongly againit the clause which would fix a price : he said .it was' 'to destroy by a side wind all that bad hitherto been done in the debatei on this subject ; and this, too, in a moment, without any deliberate discussion. Mr. Alderman COOMBE said a few words, but they were inaudible.Tne House then clividedcM the third reading, ' For the Io7—Against it, 27. When the Gallery Was opened, we foundon his legs Mr. PON*SONBY, objecting to Mr. ftwe's cause, on the ground that it went to counteract the entire object of the Bill. Mr. Alderman ATKINS objected to hurrying the Bill through the. House, in the manner in, which it seemed likely to be pressed. Sir H.PARNELI, denied that there was any.inten.. tion to hurry the Bill through the aottsv. Sir C. MoacK was against theiclause. Mr. CANNING was on the same side. Mr. P..GRANTmpposed the clause, as tending to destroy confidence in the growers of corn. Mr. WF.STERN opposed it on the same principle. - The Gallery was then cleared, bht no division took place, anti we understood the. clause to be negatived. APPRENTICES On the motion of Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW, the further consideration of the Report on the Ap prentices Bill Tts.postponed to Monday, the 6th of June. ,The other Orders were then disposed of, and the House adjourned at twelve o'clock. RECORDER'S RF.pottr,—,Yesterday thejlecorder made his Report of the following capital'Convicts under sentence of clath iu Nevvgate, viz. - Joseph Mirfiehl and William Featherstone ' 'for highway rob bery; William Robert Cletrents, John Becket4:leinents, Eli zabeth Evans, James Whiteman, Thomas Dodn]an, Michael Ward, and Margaret Bryan, for stealing in dwelling-lion, es ; Mary Willianis and Eliza Williams., for uttering counterfeit money; Robert Johnson, for horse-stealing; William Henry Botterill,lotforgery; : Tames Smith, for a like of Eliza- Gibbs, - for housebreaking; William Smith,.Joseph Ban nister, William Ruggins, and James Stock, for burglary; and Robert Howard, for returning from transportation. When William Ilenry Botterilt was ordered for execution on Monday next. The others were re spited during pleasUrc. STREET-ROBBERY.-Yesterday ---- Sturges w as charged, at the Marlborough-sneer Office; with putting Mr. Scotland in fear, and taking from h's person a quantity of silver. It appeared.by the statemenvof the prosecutor, that he was walking along Lisle-street,_a few evenings since, when he was su'rrounded by the prisoner, another mall, and tWo women, and the men charged him with vio lence towards onc of the women, whom be had never seen before. The prisoner stated himself to be an Officer of Justice,. and, by patting' him in tortor, obtained of him half. a-crown. The other man swore that was pot.a compensation for the prosecutor's 'Misconduct, and Mr. Scotland gave them all the silver' lie had for protection, prisoner was fully conialitted for trial. i T Tr- `r The following imperial Ukdee, or ProcAl7.4til's was read 71t the General. Meeting- of the 17 . :i ce r r ::)rei -n ,c;re ar Bible Q S en7 i t T e , t, wns: nesctay,niy 4, 1814, by the Rev'. Pi ttiN aT , li\r; frOni Moscow', as evincing the iivehTintcres i which the tlniieror ALEXAiIDER takes in thetausJ . . ET A st. ATI° NA 1. s ea•osl II CC cc BELOVED SurO.EcTS!-HA year is e,or we were called u;?on to retnryt thanks , to t° l, delivering our realms from the. b an d s 0 f crue' e , potyeritil, enemies. Sbarcel i 3 vthe p'res elit Y l r i e` o ;Pired, and already Our victnrlons Oanl lers ,: ve ' erected on the Banks of the lihine:•'° " Thi st ' :4 1 ; eki w hi ch i tlg, v V43 . "a i t l 1 )71 sr i agai n s t t he u s r;at i i s ol o w ~'oltirr tRi c~hicil lie b e ; !wren ltus3ia and France follow our and, having united their arms with (turf) kt"..'. them against the Oppressor of the Natio": So great a change 'upon earth could 0 1 4 been effected by the ...!peeial power of ( - 7:Od. destiny of Nations • aniVStatus A - nd the power of Wi,o is po , ve i r without hith ? Who' Strong and stablr , eis h will,y his? Let tfs-Nrn to him with our heart and mind Let us not.be proud of oi lr r e. deeds. Let us-never i m a g i ne that we ilf: . '"P;‘ ) ps than weak mortals. What are we ? Sts .he hand 0.00 is with us, we are po sse ,, ss .,:re of xvisdom and might ; but wi t h out .'lu; nothing. - Let all the prise of Man,. iheiaifO rc ' t he silenced before Let each of 'us pres ent 6 -0: sacrifice of praise to him to whom it is (hie , , true glory and honour: is humility before hi ll ',b.: . We are coui'inced that e ac h o f o u r faithf" l . s , o Jects always' feels 'this, and especially alt er L f s . much divine goodness has been poured Out ulq u ir i v Animated, therefore, by these sentiMents. bl tuilitt and zeal, we ordain, on the present , sion, that throughout o ur wh o l e em pire temple of God-be ope ne d 3 'that in every ch ' i f r o l solemn thanksg - ivings he pres e nt e d, on b el ":, s ; • knees, to the Maker. and Dispo s e r ofi. andAhat all present tears of the wariAol,g ra „, tilde - to him for the unspeak a ble mercy 1 -le vr , ll By the power of his almighty arm he bath " 3 1 : 1 ,.. us.out of great deeps,' and placed us on the : - :, 11 nacle of glory :—Whitt shall we render ut-qq ... ~ but tear§ of gratitude and jdy !. , ilt. , (Signed) • " ALEXAN DP " 'ellen at the fired-quarters, Carlsrutie, Dec. g (0.5.), 1813." LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING's BENCH, M. 11( 23. si This being the last day o f . E aster Term, the "rice ness of the day %,Ls chiefly motions of Po c previous to the ensuing Sittings.. • THE RING . I , ,TRPHEW. , 10 This was 4 crimecriminal info O onrmati, and I t 4 Li moved to enlarge the limle,which was g rante;', condition of consenting to the-examinati(in 'll at witness on interrogatories. It was doubt e '' Ue first whether ,a witness could be allowed t° o ; eamined on interrogatories in- a criminal e e ,1 hut Lord ELLENBOROUGH said, be recollecit instance when it was done in the case of peachwent of'Mr. Ibritings. Lord Tut/ Iti' ()‘ ;• Ogg there held it might be d on e on the - payer°"ease, parties. It "w•as therefore directed in thi s r - ro - a the *defendant signi ng hi s consen t with hi s band. THE KING V. S. The Court g ave judgment ITH this ca-- ° o f the w- Manctanius, cailiug upon the "tlefeudant by wh.at'authorify he exercised the o ffice ()f of Colchester. • C -The judgment went on the form of tb ti" , and ‘vas for the Relator in three Co" 11". for tbe defendant tfpon one. The \ late cold winds and rain hpve boa n° , 1 4 1, " 1- etlcct on the very promising apple blown tbrp' tire cider Zwinties. ,a for Veal in Chard market, on Saturday last, 4d. per lb. ; .beef and mutton, from 7d. t ° i lttee pork, 6-.ld. Potatoes were . 2s. a hag' bushels. Best Wheat 'fetched no,higilo tt° . .inferior samples 7s. 6(1. and - 6s. per • b u shel. sold for Bd.: per lb. - r 0. . . . . , • • ' BIRTFIS. * l2. 5 ,0i3, °'''' ' In lle'rrion-street, Dublin tl Countess 'de - ~. ie. • , e Pu b"? daugliter.• 'On 'Sato rday; the - 14th inst. in - MOuntjoy-5(1 . 1 . g, r ; ? i the the Lady of A. H. C. Pollock, - .Y.sq. of i son. ,faci. , - , -Qn the 16th in-st. ritMitlfip-Prall;''Courity of Sl' - g ,,,,,Voq' i ' Countess Dowager,of-Massereene, the Lady of G e°f° .. i f 'aitt• Esq: of a son. • - • ' ' • • ...Ire, .... 0 13 ' On' the' 14th inst. at . hip house' in Chnflotte -cc i t ' of ~ a. , . burgh, the Lady of-Robert..,DoWnie, q Es". o. - i•Al'P i "' we , ~ ca ptairi • ' Yesterday se'nnight, ' at Gosport, the Lady 0 ` „ v zard; Royal Engineers,'of aSon, of 14e "r1 . son. 0n :unary, at Clank-am Common, the- La"' Goss.e, Esq. of a daugliti.T. - --, ........- O f ; 1 s a O m n p so t - 1 1 1 1 e ita l i ti v i i inst. n ...E s qa.t of S t . 1, i ,1, 4 111 - s a ::t i r t s y l , ,l s 7 . l s d . 1 , 0 o S il e il e : i'a de e r ; f r . . M O i s s a ' I S ' t i t Y -u r A d l' k I t I v L I a e se: I t a t ; Sprague, of Bridge-street, Westniinste;, to 143rr A t rsit" ti daughter of the late John rierd, - E„ of Lanibetl9' los Drs' On the 41st inst. John Durell Esc brother of Tr, of tilee roll, Esq. Manlier,of Southampton,‘-. Miss Ler r ' ' '' ' • ._ .took Island of Jersey. . ' of " .i On the Vd ., last. at Stepney, Mr. Jelin CC):011, street, to Miss Jane Arthur, of Ste 1---rreen._______-----' pm. , St. Ntirgajree., Nirotivinste,:kiol , DIED.- . In the 88th year of . .. iIY. WS. (I:nirtS.):yridtal,yomno:inisilig'_l o re. i Horton, the wife of E. Horte i n, E q of Cattott,-13e,,.!br one a' te_uat ? to a n Henry Gore, t f the Navy, son to :his :vlnjesty's Justices of the Peace for the Isle of ElY' Ge oi'e I , li i s n aLgTie:e,ri,H.lisoa_irj.ll:l:-(sitirsoeicjiti,ds,a c;: l. s e : . . passage oat to the Mediterrant;ao!3 or e, s vicr of Balser-street . maid P a Vicar of Stoctron, Bristol, and Kilton, in the . 4t, Stugurey; at an advanced age, the 13- 07 . '---- odeWellsd The former place he served fug'-near oyears- a ' () i t a Wie.l-0 Vicar. of ' A few days since, in Broad Fields, in the Isle Mrs. Jolliffe, wife of Benjamin Jolliffe, r,'ariel73-1a Lately, 'Thomas Ilolman, Esti nearly half a centu ) , trent Solicitor at Down ham Market.i ' - ___.-------'.--'''''' i• Mr. and,Latly Noll. r 9 SuuderlandCOAL MARKET, MAY' 523. vrio . 4 Ships at Market. Ships sold. , 0 66- (3. 67 Newcastle D4 ... .14s• t• ..d ......... 4,• • to Cintter, 0 • ...... --s. Od• • - Cray" - LONDON : Printed J. c„kits; ilLn• rs;o• buildings ; w • O( r; . ' l i4 " e.. at,tl2e Sulc-Orncr., No. 112 ICi 1(11C SS'-‘ • ..... 0. to od. iittuit be