The Sun. — London, England, 1814-03-31 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS, IA TEDNESPAY, MARCH SO. Connsel were beard in the cases Goodright v. Rigby—Mead Tl , .ndnn—Lament v. Larunnt,-in all 4 which the judg . tnents were affirmed. • . Hu Tea iN S, from the Bank, presented an Account-of the I3ank of England Notes in circulation, prices of gold and silver, Zirc.--Laid on the table.. The Writs of Assistance Bill was read a second time,' and ordered to be committed to-morrow. - The Clergy Penalties Bill, and Legal fluays Bill, were br, , ught up from the Commons, and read a first time. • The ArelihiFhop of CANTERBURY give notice, that he should move the =2 d reading of the Clergy t „; ) enalties Bill to marrow, if it could he printed in time.- . --Adjourned. • HOUSE OF COMMONS. The West India Trade Bill, the West India Ships Rill, arid the Coflea Bill, were severally committed. The reports to be received to-morrow. The Legal Quays pill was read a third time, and passed. The House went into a Committee on the Acts relating to Sailcloth. Report to be received to-morrow. Mr. LUSHINGTON" brought in a Bill to revive and continue the Acts relating' to Gold Coin. It was read a first time, and ordered to he read a second time to-morrow. The Salt Duty Bill was read a second time. Committed on MILITARY ROADS BILLS, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the se cond reading of the Military Roads Thu t .it wue reAd a second time • He then moved that it inight be committed, in order that the different anaendthents which had. been suggested from Scotland might be received. The next. stage might ,be de ferred for some time, in order to give the parties concerned in the Bill time to consider it in its amended state. The Bill was then committed, and the report received after which the- Chancellor of the Exchequer moved that the further consideration of the Bill should be delayed till the 3d of May. A greed to. , _ The Clergy Penalties Suspension Bill was then read a third time, and passed. HACKNEY POOR, BILL. Mr. MELLISH then moved the second reading of the Hackney Poor Bill. _ _ Mr. WROTTESLY did not rise to oppose the second read ing, but. be thought some strong reason should be given, why a clause was inserted, which ivas a direct departure from the usual law in cases of poor. Mr. ROSE said a few words in an inaudible tone. Mr. BYNG said, he should feel jealous if the principle of the present bill were likely to be : extended : he thought that the bill should:not be allowed to pass unless a good case were made out by the people of Hackney. Sir EGERTON BRYDGES was against the bill. Mr. MELLISH agreed, that it was incumbent on the pa rish of Hackney to make out a sufficiznt case, but that would be beit done in a committee : he.said that IS or 16 of the pa rishes adjoining Hackney were in thesituation s which was now asked by that parish. Sir S.ROMILLY thought it incumbent on the parish to present a very clear case, when they came forward to ask for a law different from the law of the nation; He alluded to the haste with which those bills were usually passed ; the conse quence of (which inattention was, that perhaps there was al 'most a different law fort very parish. Soon after the recess, a question would be discussed, which would embrace the prin-. ciple of the present bill: and ha should think it better that the House should wait for the information which might result from that.. caste, unless there were any pressing reason for passing the bill immediately. • Mr. NVB.OrrESLY said, after what had fallen from his Learned Friend on the subject of a Bill of similar principle which was soon to be discussed,' he should wish the present ko be postponed. Mr. MELLISH hoped the 'Learned and Hon. Gentleman would attend the Committee on the Bill, which would be thu proper stage for rejecting the clause. His Bill would not interfere with Mr. Keurick's Bill. The petitioners were per sons of the-irst respectability, who paid rates to the amount of 28,0001.; and that there was a necessity for some enact ment was evident, because by different evasions only 18001. could be collected from a district which ought to pay 40001.1 Mr. WETHERELL _maintained that there was no novelty in the Bill, but that jts object was to carry into effect an Act that had been evad e. _ _ . _ _ Sir S. ROMILLY repeated, that his only wish fov postpon ing the second reading was, that the House might have the bcnetieof a discussion on Mr. Kenridk'S Bill before they came to a decision upon this. Mr. ROSE again said a few words; but was again inau dible. The House then divided— For the second reading 'l7 Against it Majority for the second reading 1 MAYO ELECTION. Mr. WETHERELL moved that Mr. Wm. Green, the agent for the Petition on the Mayo Election, should be called to the Bar of the House to be examined. - Mr. W, Gtr its: was then called in, and in answer to seve ral questions front the SPEAKER, said that he.was Agent to Mr. Kirwan, but had not received from him the names of the persons who were to enter into the recognizances : he did not know.whether Mr. Kirwan Was in Englaud, but bad heard he, was cousinz over : on Thursday last he wrote to 241 t%. M‘Donald, of lltiblin, Mr. Kirwan's Agent, and expected to receive from him the names required in the course of the week. Tilt 'he had the answer, he could not proceed with the petition : he was also agent for the other petitioners, but was in the same difficulty as to them. He was then direetC4 to withdraw. W.ETI'IItELL then moved, that the time for putting the reogniiatices be enlarged to the...l9th of April, which, fter come obseryations en the part of Mr, WYN and Sir J. G ILAIIANI., was carried: COLONIAL OFFICE BILL. Mr. GrampußN presented the Papers moved for on the precediog evening by Mr. Creevey, who moved, that the same should be printed. The Hon. Gentleman proceeded to ob serve, that, a.s,the papers were of .great importance, he could wish that the further consideration of the subject should be postponed to Monday or Tuesday. Mr. GOL7LBUKN had ,no objection to some delay, if the roo,rs could not he printed against to-morrow. Mr.-tREKVEY said, that though the papers might be print • d, it would be impossible for 11/embers to examine them pre- Viourto the discussion. .fitter some observations on the part of the CHANCELLOR of tke ..Excitr.qur.a, Wiltruazan, Mr. ABERCRomitY, and Mr. BRAND, tin Committee on the Bill was axed for Friday. Mr. WALLACE moved, that an account of the number of ships of the line, and of frigates, built in the merchants' yards, from January 1793, to March 1814, be laitt outke table of tbe. Llause.—Orderett: THE BOURBONS AND THE NEGOCIATIONS. Mr. BRAND rose for The purpose of putting two. questions to' the Right Honourable Gentleman (the Chancellor of the ]xchequer . ), to answer which he hoped there would be no objection. First, whether Government had sent out, or was about to send out, a ship to convey the Duke. of Berri to' Bourdeaux ?--and,' secondly, whether Negociations were still carried on at thatillon be tween the Ambassadors of the Allies and of the Emperor of France ? Ihe CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER replied; that with regard to the second question he should have thought that the Honourable Member would have been aware,, that in the present situation •of affairs it would not be fit to give any answer upon . the subjeat. On the first inquiry we understood the Riot Honourable G en tl eman to put a nega tive; hut the low tone of voice in which he spoke would not permit what he said to be distinctly heard in the gallery. SPEECH OF THE SPEAKER. NORTON' Ivished to learn from the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Ponsonhy) if he could, now fix the day when his Noble Friend (Lord Morpeth) .iitted" to bring the subject of which he had furmvrly given notice undez• the consideration of the House. I'uNaC)YBY stated in answer, that his Noble bringing the subject befoie the House. IN trio thought the day would be incon venient to many Members. • Mr. PONSONBY said, his Noble Friend would not, consent to any farther pcntponement; though, perhaps, he might agree to bring it on a.feW days earlier-for example, on the Monday preceding. With regard to the convenience of Members, he apprehended that it had not been-eonsnited in the recent adjournments.; and on many questions of a public nature, it was impossible that it could be. consulted. He could not, in the name of his No ble.. Friend, consent to anylurther•delay. Mr. NORTON then moved, that the„ House be called over on Friday, April 22, Mr. BANKES expressed a wish to know what shape the question was likely to assume.. Every Member bad aright to expect previous informa tion •respecting any proceeding to be instituted against him ; and the same justice was-Undoubt edly due to the distinguished individual whose conduct ,it was intended to bring under the cog nizance of the HOuse. . \II. TIEItNEY said, that ample information would be given, and that the Noble Lord, the moment he -had made up his mind, would give them notice, though there was no reason why the House should be put in possession of the na ture of the motion a fortnight previous to the dis cussion. . Mr. B. BATHURST said, that questions similar to that of the Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Bankes) had been often put on behalf of the House, which was certainly placed at present in an unusual si tuation. The House did not know what , the tore of the motion would be, and had ,a right" to expect some information respecting it. He hoped the Noble Lord would put the House in posses sion of the nature of his motion at as early a pe riod as .possible. aft% W. WyNNT said, there was no parliamen tary•ride for giving notice at all ; antrthe only . reason for giving it was, in order to collect a suf ficient attendance of Metubers. The House had no right to expect any nOtice The .CNINCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was of opinion, that as a charge was to be preferred against the Chair, the nature of that charge should be stated, and rash charges should not be al lowed to be inade—(Hear from the Opposition). Mr. WYNNE.--Every Member has- a ~right to make, a charge ; and should bring it forward, if he deemed it well founded. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER resumed, and stated, that charges should be made with due deliberation, and that the House should be put in possession of all the facts connected with 'any particular charge. Mr. WHITBREAD.—The Right Hon. Gentleman did not seem to know the rights of the House. , --, If any thing could prevent his Noble Friend from giving previous notice of the nature of his motion, it should be the term allowed—(Hear, hear You, Sir, (said Mr. Whitbread, turning to the Speaker), must recollect an instance of a motion._ made without any previous notice, by a Right Hon. Gentleman, then Secretary of State (Mr. Canning), when it was thought that some un founded strictures bad been made upon your con duct. He (Mr. W.) should be sorry the exact words of the motion should not be previously communicated to the Chair; but he would not be compelled to give them a day earlier than at first, intended, from any thing that had then been said. . Mr. WALLACE.--His Right Hon. Friend never intended to call in question the privileges of the House; or to deny the rights of its Members ;.nor did the term allow warrant any such inference. That term was applied only to the power of the House, and he trusted the• House would , not al low such a charge to be brought forward without proper notice. Mr. PoxsoNny.—lt was possible the Right Hon. Gentlemati might have used the term in the sense ascribed to it by the last Speaker ; though he himself had thought he intended to say, that, in this case, the House should exert its authority. By the usage of the House, a general notice only was giyen. Were the case otherwise, instead of notices, the motions ,themselves should be enter ed on the Journals, and exhibited in the lobby of the House. The Noble Lord would act with due caution; though he would not submit the words of his motion to any man, till he had submitted them- to the House itself., Of the nature of the 'motion, none - could be ignorant, which went to disapprOve of a speech made at the close of the last Session, at the ,bar of the House of Peers ; and what more had ever been required ? Were it in his power to communicate the precise words of the motion, he would cot 'do it, on account of, such an unreasonable demand. Mr. T. COUiTENA ' Y thought it was of great importance for the House to know the grounds of the motion. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUPE said, he bad been much misunderstood. it never had been the practice of the House to take a charge into consideration on the same day on which it had been preferred ; and he thought the HOUse would scarcely allow a deviation from its regular course of proceeding. Sir J. NEWPORT.—The House bad been put in possession of the grounds of the Motion at the commencement of the Session ; and , the attend ance of Members would be enforced by a call of the House. There existed no necessity for the precise wordi being communicated, and he 'hoped no such communication would be made. The question was then put, that the House he called over on the 22d of April, and carried in the affirmative.—Adjourned. A mare, the property of SIPLRY, Grosve nor-street, was backed to go 50 miles in five hours; a month since; The animal started Yester day on the .Hantingdon-road, and did 14. miles in the first hour, 13 in-the second, 11 in the third, and other 12 in 57 minutes. Time was backed at 6 and 7 4. The mare, which is six years old, was sold on the ground for 1501. She was rode by two boys, who relieved. • CHILD DROPPING.—A deSerted male child was found at the door of Mr. IPSLRY, in Bird-street, on Tuesday evening. The infant was apparently about three months old, and was carefully scrapped in flannel. The Parish Officers have the child to be owned; I Ur. VY 1 An Bow -STRrET.-- - Yesterday was the day aipoint cd for a second eN:ataination of John Mason, alias John Henry' Alcides, and• Andrew Thompson, alias fluttery two of the principals in a gang of swill& lets. Soon after being placed at the bar, the pri soner, Thompson, agreed that a - closet in the Chambers of Clement's-inn, which he had refused to have opened on his first examination,,shottld be broken open, and the papers which it con tained brought to the Office. On their tieing:ex amined, they corresponded with those seized , on their first apprehension generally ; but they were so extremely numerous, that it was impossible to examine theft' contents particularly: many of them purported to be law papers, similar to those at any regular attorney's office, such as cases for counsel, briefs, and papers in Chancery, with theprisorter Thompson's name at the bottom. • Mr. BA)tav attended.for the prisoners, and ap plied to Itlr. MIRES for the return of all the pa pers that did not relate to the charges against them. Mr. ALLEY, on the part•Of the prosecu,- tion, objected to this, at least till they had been inspected by Messrs Bishcp and Phillips, the. at torn:ys . at who -had undertaken to carry on the prosecution • ARES agreed to this, and stated, that it Was his determination, if in any of the papers it was found that ThompSon had been acting as an attorney, he shotkld be prosecuted for that - offence. Since their apprehension, art attempt had been made to put a plausible tale upon their proceed ings, by some of.their gang pretending to open a. house in Portland-street; as the insurance-office, for which they had issued the advertisements for youths as clerks. The swindlers called it the London, ;Vliddlesex,,and 'County Weekly Benefit Life Insurance-office; and are said to have ob tatted various sums by it.. -The whole was prin cipally intended as an allurement for the poorer classes to subscribe one shilling a week. in the course of the examination, Shepherd, the youth imposed upon, stated, that Thompson told him, that Mason, who was at. the head of the Insitranee Office, was a rich old fellow, who would in fact receive the 351. paid for the appointment ;_ but that they were obliged to act, with much caution now, as Mrs. Clarke had made it very dangerous to have any thing to do with the sale-of places. also, stated that lie gave Thompson a protnis sory note for five guineas,payable in two months; tor .his agency in the business. This ease being gone through, Mr. ALLEY said he considered both prisoners concerned in fraudu lently obtaining the money:and thought that Thompson should be detained on a charge of- fOr gery, having signed and uttered the name of Hut ton to the receipt, unless he, could prove that some person. of the name of Hutton authorised him to sign it. The Magistrate .was•of a different opinion, and suspected that the Judges would consider the signing of the receipt, as a, part of thifraudulent transaction, as they did in the case of the King agqinst Young. The next case gone into was a similar one to the above, with George Crow, -a youth 16 years of age, the son of Mrs.• Crow, who keeps the gate at the Stable-yard, St. James's, from- whom Thompson obtained 30/. for a place in the In surance-Office. . Samuel Maine, the uncle of the youth, stated, that he answered the advertisement referring to Veele's Coffee-house, and received a letter desir ing him to call at Clement's-inn, where le had several interviews with Thompson. Mason car ried on the farce to such an extent as to write to the boy's schoolmaster, 28 miles out of London, for his character as to morals and abilities, and received such a flattering .answer, that Mason said he should pay particular attention to his improve ment in the office. At length, Mr. Maine gave Thompson a .check for 301. on a banker; and Thompson gave him a similar receipt, without stamp, and signed it Hutton and Co. Several gentlemen attended, and proved their having given money to Thompson and Mason, in consequence of their advertising distressed cases. Witnesses were ordered to be advertised for. The prisoners were committed for further eta mination ; and Mr. NARES informed them; if their cases were only considered frauds, he should ex pect their"bail in each case 4001. and two sureties in 2001. and 24 hour's notice. TUESDAY'S GAZETTE--(Continued.) DIVIDENDS. April 19. T. A. Doffing, of Stone-house, Devonshire, sbop keeper—April 25.- S. Wheatley, Bristol, grocer—April 25. 0. Greenway, J. T. Greonway, and F. H. Greenwxy, of Bristol, stonemasons—April 25. T.. Freaure, of Worcester, draper—April 26. T. 'Poppleton, of Boston, draper—April 26. R. Finnis, of 'favistock-street, Bedford-square, money. ; scrivener—April 20. R. Guthrie and C. Cooke,"of Liverpool; merchants✓-April 30: J. Kesteven,'. Kesteien, and J. Kest even, of York-street, Covent-garden, men's mercers—J. D. Jones, of - Philpot-lane, merchant—May 14. W. A. Jores, of Aldermanbury, haberdasher—April 2. J. Npwlao, Keat street, Whitechapel, soap-manufacturer•—April 2. J. B. Hud son, of Hackney-grove, Middlesex, merchant—April 13. G. Morecroft and S. Bates, of Birmingham, corn-dealers—April 2G. J. Blick; of Lower Thoroliaugh-stree4 Bedford-square, tailor—April 21. sE. H. Wilson and J. Westmoreland, of, Li , verpool, spirit 7 merehants—April 2. E. T. Waters, of the Old South Sea-House, merchant—April 23. B. Adams, of Buck, lershard, Southampton, ship-builder. cEirriFICATES—AvRIL 19. J. Bedenham, of Cheant, Surrey, innkeeper—S. Mendham, of Fenthurch-street, merchant—H.Tew, of Wcilclose-square, tea-dealer—G. Payne, of Hunter-street worth, St. Pancras, timber-merchant—J. Cordwell, of Manchester, victualler— T. Hampton and E. Hooper, of Ithayader, bankers. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. • J. Parry and J. Daniell, of Bristol, oilmen.—S. Hayardahl and W. Eland, of Russell-street, Southwark, leather-dressers.' T. Maddox and W. Yiing, of Worcester, tailors.—W. Brad ley. and C. Leslie, of Limehouse, hoat-builders.—P. Hughes, W. Mackay, and It. Young, of Russell-street, Bermondsey, leathcr-dressers.---E. Dyke and D. Wright, of George-street, Hanover-square, dress-makers.—W. Garuiss and' J. Cubitt, of Oicford-Street, tailors.:—J. Lloyd and J-Miller,of Hanway street, Oxford-street, stable-keeper.---W. Wilson, 3. Welch, and J. Newhall, of Upper Thames-street, ironmongers.--J. Aspinall and It. Hughes, timber-meici,ants.—F.Sinithers and M. Swinfen, of Great ••Cdstle-street. Oxford-street, sehool raistresses.—E. Fogg and W. Morris, of Al iermanbury, wobl len-factnrs.—W. Greenall, J. Cliallinor, J. Kirkman, of Bolton-le-Mtrors, ironfoun(krs.----J. and S. Grew, of Itirining ,ham, button-makers.—S. Grew and W. Hudson, of Binning , ham, brush-inalier , . . The jkl;litia fc ; rce under Colonel BAYLEY, at PortSatouth, has received orders to embark. for Botlrdeaux, and sails this dly‘for its 'destination. Scveral tiam?otatt; . ea - can e'lrrying 10,0110 stand'of arms, have sailed, it is presumed; for that 4nd other points of tho coast of France. At the Stafford Assizes on Saturday last, j 9114 Nicholson was convicted of haying sent a thrif-at ening in letter to Mr. Levett, Ni'111" , nor, n that county. The prisoner, it appe aren, was a poacher, and having been warned off Mr' Levett's grounds, tie sent him a fetter, biddil him take care 'he had not a ball through hie lievi! • Mr. Justice Dau.as„in passing sentence of death on the prisOner, commented severely on the de': monlike offence of putting a man in constaul terror of death from an unknown hand. I'm prisoner, a roan of the most hardened physto.., nomy, who had remained unmoved during to! whole of the trial, gave way to the impressive' l l Of this lesson, and burst into'tears ! It appear'-'... during the course of the trial, that the prisonc being too poor to retain any counsel, Mr. L ovett generously furnished him with the Means, 011 also recommended bins to mercy. At the same Assizes, Thomas Forsyth, iged 561 a bankrupt, who tormerly Kept a drap.er's at B(trslem, in Staffordshire, was charged wit'f concealing, removing, and embezzling different', articles., to the value of 201. and upwards , wit ' I . intent to defraud his creditors.- The &knee char"' ; ed was committed tivo years ago, during time the prisoner had mostly residedin .1)0 ,1 ( 1 ` )Iii The jury found a verdict of guilty, hut jinlgote,s'l was arrested in consequence of various legal P u i jections taken by the prisoner's Counsel, 'one `', l which was, that the prisoner had not sobsceibc his surrender under the commission. Catharine fra/Ircr, aged 32, charged with th 6 wilful tuurd'er of her female bastard child at 14; toxeter, was sentenced to be imprisoned ts% years. Upon the trial, her son, JohulS r iaci.i boy apparently 11 or 12 years of age, was caliti as an evidence against his mother: e on being sworn, he cast his loifks to die 13. ,4 e where his mother stood, and bursting'iato a ) 1() ; hnt flood cdtears, he, exclaimed, " Ph, mothe r ' Oh , pother !" ilis impassioned gestures foil n r) _, - controllable emotions were such, that almost e" } j eye-that was upon him was moistened, and e" 4 l,' heart vibrated to , his feelings. The exPeeta tinl i of,a conviction for murder had previously b; abandoned, and fortunately there was suffiriC,''; evidence, ,without examining him, to prove u birth and concealment ;..the painful task 'cr therefore spared, and the boy was not exarnioe'l; At the Chester Assizes% fienry Puttaa charged with being at large before rile expir9li°l-f of his sentence of transportation. The resort :4 his conviction, the identity of his person, and, being at large before the expiratiqu of his s c l e tence, were clearly made out. The prisoner 1 0 ' I Iso.defence, but stated to the Court, that lie lt"; effected his escape fl•ons' Sidney, in New S t/ r ut ; Wales, by concealing himself in the hold 0 %, ship, where he remained during the Whole ror a '. a period of ten months ; in the whole of this e". riod, he never saw the light of day . , and sul'oi° / e te on such foul as he could obtain by stealth t t ' it night time. After his return to this cou ntry , 34. obtained, be said, his living by honest int i ti st The Jury found him Guilty. , . METEOROLOGICAL JOWLY:IL' BY R. BANKS, , 0 701. PHILOSOPHICAL I-NbTRUMENT INIALIFPC Thermometer. I IS'e:it It"' ~... • ' .:-.- ''''"-' •.' ' ''' ' -;"; "9 . 5. ea V i , ,7 4 , , cz r•-, ""' , ; :1 , c-: a .c - - Mirch c' ' ' '''' Inches 19 31 32 33 30 30.10 20 35 40 41 33 19.9;1 21 4$ 44 47 43 .SO 2-2 4U 47 50 141 .65 .25 C .1• 11.11: 1 : i i:r : 1:: 11. I,i/,,(St I Po' 2:.1 44 4f 50 40 .00 ' Do. r).,.. 24 45 45 47 143 .91 ' Hain , • I' , W P 25 45 46 Sul 41 .60 .07 Do. • i I I .32 • • Bi lITHS. ~. . . . . . AS. .onday last, at Portsmouth, Mrs. Diet:ens; ";"6.0. 'oesciay morning. in Christ's Hospital, thy: wile.' P. Stevens, of a suu. 3bth inst. Mrs. Tucker, wife of William - Par)i ; place, kennington-eross, of a son. of • 0 1 ' • aturday, at Hull, was safely delivered, the wife •., A I O rillsinson, Carpenter, of two girls and a boy's si je • tiler of a large family. On On '1 Rai•. L. On ti Esq. of liaru W the mot MARRIED. On the 29th inst. at Clapham Church, • the Rev. " Tower, of Brentwood, Essex, to Miss Fanny Hilibertf Chs'vh% ter of George Hibbert, lisp. of C:toliaur Common- 4 At Worcester, March 29, John . Balser, Esq• cf House, Worcestershire, to Ilarhdra St. John, eldest dil tl " o 4lA' of ,Lhe Rev. J. F. S. Fiewing-St . John, one of the Pr IEW ries of the Cathedral. . ._, . • DI - E.l). . • IP On the 17th of . February last, at Madeira, Orlan d ; t 1 eldest sun of Richard Whalley Bridgman, E,sq..of Bath , ' 25th year of his age. ,„..1,4; ;:r On the sth March, Si Sir Walttr outgouterie CiPu ll " — of Corsebill, Scotb - -nl, '....! , .rt. - 1 fr e. At.Crailiaig, Srk.tlattd, on the 17th March, aged 77, tenant-Colonel Gordon Chines. , . 10°. On the kith inst. Mrs. M. Cuyler, formerly of die Roval,..Drury-lan'!. Obil l' on Sunday last, in the 77th year "of his age, the Re*,,,,ty-' topher•Alderson, B. D. Rector of Eckington, in the ''''' Derby, and for many years Rectur,of Aston, Yorkshire.o vis On Sunday last, the '47th of March, at He, - ,ton-li t ',", P ottit seat of the Earl of Wilton, Lady Amelia Grosvenor , ": ‘ ,ol; t ' daughter of the Earl and Countess Grosvenor, in the year of her age. ~ 4-' ,uip;vr On Monday the 2Rtli inst. at Exmouth, Mr. Geori - of of OE Bond-street. c 6 , 1,. , On Wednesday last, Mrs. Peacock, wife ~ .f . .I . r. Pea New Bond-street- ---e---. COAL Al.'. RKET, MARCH 30. . 11 , Ships at Market. Ships sold. 1 1 rIce• 5 I tol` ls ' 0 ,1 - Gai Newcastle 594 695. Of • •-. ' o ,l ' 30f Sunderland . , 2Pf .59 5. 0 ,1. to 0 9 4, 1 ' Cinders • 0 - 0c22-- • PRICE .OF STOCKS YEs'r pr. t e 2 V Bunk Stock, shut ludia G n ds, 31. 4 ' Navy 5 per Gent:. 931 92i , Ex 4 per Ceut. shut 15i1 141 1 4 3 :3 per Cent. Red. shut I Ditto for Payment, 3 per Cent. Cons. 65 641 654 -10' Imperial 43 per Cen t : Mink L. Ann. shut Ar India. Stock,' - 1.()tip()INI: Printed by J. D: CARSTAIItS, No• buildings; :and Published by W. A. stquer , at the-- St . rN-Oeri6.l, No. 1:2,;" Strand ;. witere . merits, Order;, Lotturs (poo.-paid),.&c, must be. au"' ~~